natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Agency shall be considered the legal successor of the Executive Agency established by Decision 2004/20/EC as amended by Decision 2007/372/EC.
Šteje se, da je Agencija pravna naslednica izvajalske agencije, ustanovljene s Sklepom 2004/20/ES, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2007/372/ES.
Cost Benefit Analysis for the delegation of certain tasks regarding the implementation of Union Programmes 2014-2020 to the Executive Agencies (Final report), 19 August 2013.
Analiza stroškov in koristi za prenos določenih nalog v zvezi z izvajanjem programov Unije za obdobje 2014–2020 na izvajalske agencije (končno poročilo), 19. avgust 2013.
On the benefit side, efficiency gains of EUR 104 million are to be expected by implementing the agency scenario compared to the in-house scenario. Furthermore, the alignment of more coherent programme portfolios with the Agency’s core competences and its brand identity will lead to significant qualitative benefits.
Prenos izvajanja programov na Agencijo naj bi v primerjavi z internim izvajanjem omogočil prihranek v višini 104 milijonov EUR. Poleg tega bo prilagoditev več skladnih portfeljev programov glavnim pristojnostim Agencije in njeni identiteti prinesla velike koristi v smislu kakovosti.
Decisions 2004/20/EC and 2007/372/EC are repealed with effect from 1 January 2014.
Sklepa 2004/20/ES in 2007/372/ES se razveljavita z učinkom od 1. januarja 2014.
References to the repealed Decisions shall be construed as references to this Decision.
Sklicevanja na razveljavljena sklepa se razumejo kot sklicevanja na ta sklep.
appointing five members of the Court of Auditors
o imenovanju petih članov Računskega sodišča
The terms of office of Mr Gijs DE VRIES, Mr Henri GRETHEN, Mr Michel CRETIN, Mr Ioannis SARMAS and Mr David BOSTOCK are due to expire on 31 December 2013.
Mandati Gijsa DE VRIESA, Henrija GRETHENA, Michela CRETINA, Ioannisa SARMASA in Davida BOSTOCKA se iztečejo 31. decembra 2013.
New appointments should therefore be made,
Zato bi bilo treba opraviti nova imenovanja —
The following are hereby appointed members of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019:
Za člane Računskega sodišča se za obdobje od 1. januarja 2014 do 31. decembra 2019 imenujejo:
Opinion of 11 December 2013 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 11. decembra 2013 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Council Decision
Sklep Sveta z dne
of 17 December 2013
17. decembra 2013
A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions will become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Emilia MÜLLER,
Zaradi konca mandata Emilie MÜLLER se je sprostilo mesto člana Odbora regij –
The following is hereby appointed as member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:
Za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2015, se v Odbor regij imenuje:
approving restrictions of authorisations of biocidal products containing bromadiolone notified by Germany in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o odobritvi omejitev dovoljenj za biocidne pripravke, ki vsebujejo bromadiolon, ki ga je Nemčija priglasila v skladu z Direktivo 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2013) 9030)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 9030)
Having regard to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market [1], and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet [1], in zlasti člena 4(4) Direktive,
Commission Directive 2009/92/EC [2] added the active substance bromadiolone for use in products belonging to product-type 14, Rodenticides, as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC.
Direktiva Komisije 2009/92/ES [2] je dodala aktivno snov bromadiolon za uporabo v pripravkih, ki spadajo v 14. vrsto izdelkov, rodenticidi, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi V k Direktivi 98/8/ES.
For reasons of public health and hygiene, it was nevertheless found to be justified to include bromadiolone and other anticoagulant rodenticides in Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC, thus allowing Member States to authorise bromadiolone-based products.
Zaradi javnega zdravja in higiene je bilo kljub temu ugotovljeno, da je upravičeno vključiti bromadiolon in druge antikoagulantne rodenticide v Prilogo I k Direktivi 98/8/ES, kar državam članicam omogoča, da izdajo dovoljenja za pripravke na osnovi bromadiolona.
However, Member States were obliged to ensure, when granting authorisation of products containing bromadiolone, that primary as well as secondary exposure of humans, non-target animals and the environment is minimised, by considering and applying all appropriate and available risk mitigation measures.
Vendar pa bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da se pri izdaji dovoljenj za pripravke, ki vsebujejo bromadiolon, zmanjšata primarna in sekundarna izpostavljenost ljudi, neciljnih živali in okolja z upoštevanjem in izvajanjem vseh ustreznih in razpoložljivih ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja.
The company Belgagri SA (‘the applicant’) has, in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 98/8/EC, submitted applications to Ireland for authorisation of four rodenticides containing bromadiolone (‘the products’).
Podjetje Belgagri SA (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik) je v skladu s členom 8 Direktive 98/8/ES Irski predložilo vlogo za izdajo dovoljenj za štiri rodenticide, ki vsebujejo bromadiolon (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pripravek).
On 5 February 2013, the applicant submitted complete applications to Germany for mutual recognition of the first authorisations in respect of the products.
5. februarja 2013 je vložnik Nemčiji predložil popolno vlogo za medsebojno priznavanje prvih dovoljenj za pripravke.
On 17 April 2013, Germany notified the Commission, the other Member States and the applicant of its proposal to restrict the first authorisations in accordance with Article 4(4) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Nemčija je 17. aprila 2013 Komisijo, druge države članice in vložnika obvestila o svojem predlogu za omejitev prvih dovoljenj v skladu s členom 4(4) Direktive 98/8/ES.
The Commission invited the other Member States and the applicant to submit comments to the notification in writing within 90 days in accordance with Article 27(1) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Komisija je povabila druge države članice in vložnika, da predložijo pisne pripombe na obvestilo v 90 dneh v skladu s členom 27(1) Direktive 98/8/ES.
The notification was also discussed between the Commission and Member States’ Competent Authorities for biocidal products in the meeting of the Product Authorisation and Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group of 14 May 2013.
Obvestilo so obravnavali tudi Komisija in organi držav članic, pristojni za biocidne pripravke, na srečanju Skupine za poenostavitev medsebojnega priznavanja in izdajo dovoljenj za pripravke dne 14. maja 2013.
In accordance with Directive 98/8/EC, authorisations of biocidal products containing bromadiolone are to be subject to all appropriate and available risk mitigation measures, including the restriction to professional use only.
V skladu z Direktivo 98/8/ES je treba za izdajo dovoljenj za biocidne pripravke, ki vsebujejo bromadiolon, upoštevati vse ustrezne in razpoložljive ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja, vključno z omejitvijo na samo poklicno uporabo.
The scientific evaluation leading to the inclusion of bromadiolone in Directive 98/8/EC concluded that only professional users could be expected to follow the instructions minimising the risk of secondary poisoning of non-target animals, and to use products in a way that prevents the selection and spreading of resistance.
Glede na znanstveno oceno za vključitev bromadiolona v Direktivo 98/8/ES se lahko le od poklicnih uporabnikov pričakuje upoštevanje navodil in s tem zmanjšanje tveganja sekundarne zastrupitve neciljnih živali ter uporaba pripravkov na način, ki preprečuje selekcijo in širjenje odpornosti.
In the absence of any indication to the contrary, restriction to professional users is therefore an appropriate and available risk mitigation measure for the authorisation of products containing bromadiolone in Germany.
Ker ni dokaza o nasprotnem, je v Nemčiji omejitev uporabe na poklicne uporabnike ustrezen in razpoložljiv ukrep za zmanjšanje tveganja pri izdaji dovoljenj za pripravke, ki vsebujejo bromadiolon.
Products for which Germany may restrict the authorisations granted in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 98/8/EC to use by trained or licensed professionals:
Pripravki, za katere lahko Nemčija omeji izdana dovoljenja za uporabo pripravkov v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 98/8/ES na usposobljene poklicne uporabnike ali poklicne uporabnike z dovoljenjem:
Irish application reference number in the Register for Biocidal Products
Referenčna številka vloge v registru biocidnih pripravkov na Irskem
Ireland granted the authorisations of the products on 30 September 2012.
Irska je 30. septembra 2012 izdala dovoljenja za pripravke.
The products were authorised with restrictions to ensure that the conditions of Article 5 of Directive 98/8/EC were met in Ireland.
Za pripravke so bila izdana dovoljenja z omejitvami, da se zagotovi upoštevanje pogojev iz člena 5 Direktive 98/8/ES na Irskem.
on a financial contribution from the Union towards emergency measures to combat avian influenza in Germany, Italy and the Netherlands in 2012 and 2013 and in Denmark and Spain in 2013
o finančnem prispevku Unije za nujne ukrepe za boj proti aviarni influenci v Nemčiji, Italiji in na Nizozemskem leta 2012 in 2013 ter na Danskem in v Španiji leta 2013
(notified under document C(2013) 9084)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 9084)
(Only the Danish, Dutch, German, Italian, and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v danskem, italijanskem, nemškem, nizozemskem in španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Article 4(3), first and second indents, of Decision 2009/470/EC lays down rules on the percentage of the costs incurred by the Member State that may be covered by the financial contribution from the Union.
Prva in druga alinea člena 4(3) Odločbe 2009/470/ES določata pravila o deležih stroškov, nastalih v državah članicah, ki jih lahko krije finančni prispevek Unije.
The payment of a financial contribution from the Union towards emergency measures to eradicate avian influenza is subject to the rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC [4].
Za plačilo finančnega prispevka Unije za nujne ukrepe za izkoreninjenje aviarne influence veljajo pravila iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 z dne 28. februarja 2005 o določitvi pravil v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [4].
The authorities of Denmark, Germany, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands informed the Commission and the other Member States in the framework of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health of the measures applied in accordance with Union legislation on notification and eradication of the disease and the results thereof.
Nemški, italijanski, nizozemski, danski in španski organi so v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali obvestili Komisijo in druge države članice o izvedenih ukrepih v skladu z zakonodajo Unije o prijavljanju in izkoreninjanju bolezni ter izidu teh ukrepov.
The authorities of Denmark, Germany, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands have therefore fulfilled their technical and administrative obligations with regard to the measures provided for in Article 4(2) of Decision 2009/470/EC and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Tako so nemški, italijanski, nizozemski, danski in španski organi izpolnili vse tehnične in upravne obveznosti v zvezi z ukrepi iz člena 4(2) Odločbe 2009/470/ES in člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
Financial contribution from the Union to Denmark, Germany, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands
Finančni prispevek Unije za Nemčijo, Italijo, Nizozemsko, Dansko in Španijo
A financial contribution from the Union shall be granted to Denmark, Germany, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands towards the costs incurred by these Member States in taking measures pursuant to Article 4(2) and (3) of Decision 2009/470/EC, to combat avian influenza in Germany, Italy and the Netherlands in 2012 and 2013 and in Denmark and Spain in 2013.
Nemčiji, Italiji, Nizozemski, Danski in Španiji se odobri finančni prispevek Unije za kritje stroškov, ki so jih navedene države članice imele zaradi sprejetja ukrepov v skladu s členom 4(2) in (3) Odločbe 2009/470/ES za boj proti aviarni influenci v Nemčiji, Italiji in na Nizozemskem leta 2012 in 2013 ter na Danskem in v Španiji leta 2013.
A first tranche of EUR 500000,00 shall be paid to Germany as part of the Union financial contribution provided for in Article 1(1).
Prvi obrok v znesku 500000,00 EUR se izplača Nemčiji kot del finančnega prispevka Unije iz člena 1(1).
A first tranche of EUR 40000,00 for 2012 and EUR 2600000,00 for 2013 shall be paid to Italy as part of the Union financial contribution provided for in Article 1(1).
Prvi obrok v znesku 40000,00 EUR za leto 2012 in 2600000,00 EUR za leto 2013 se izplača Italiji kot del finančnega prispevka Unije iz člena 1(1).
A first tranche of EUR 210000,00 for 2012 and EUR 250000,00 for 2013 shall be paid to the Netherlands as part of the Union financial contribution provided for in Article 1(1).
Prvi obrok v znesku 210000,00 EUR za leto 2012 in 250000,00 EUR za leto 2013 se izplača Nizozemski kot del finančnega prispevka Unije iz člena 1(1).
A first tranche of EUR 33000,00 for 2013 shall be paid to Denmark as part of the Union financial contribution provided for in Article 1(1).
Prvi obrok v znesku 33000,00 EUR za leto 2013 se izplača Danski kot del finančnega prispevka Unije iz člena 1(1).
A first tranche of EUR 30000,00 for 2013 shall be paid to Spain as part of the Union financial contribution provided for in Article 1(1).
Prvi obrok v znesku 30000,00 EUR za leto 2013 se izplača Španiji kot del finančnega prispevka Unije iz člena 1(1).
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the Italian Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Dansko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Kraljevino Španijo, Italijansko republiko in Kraljevino Nizozemsko.
Outbreaks of avian influenza occurred in Germany, Italy and the Netherlands in 2012 and 2013 and in Denmark and Spain in 2013.
Do izbruhov aviarne influence je prišlo v Nemčiji, Italiji in na Nizozemskem leta 2012 in 2013 ter na Danskem in v Španiji leta 2013.
Denmark, Germany, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands took measures in accordance with Council Directive 2003/85/EC [5] to combat those outbreaks.
Nemčija, Italija, Nizozemska, Danska in Španija so sprejele ukrepe za boj proti navedenim izbruhom v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2003/85/ES [5].
of 18 December 2013
z dne 18. decembra 2013
establishing the ‘Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency’ and repealing Decision 2009/336/EC
o ustanovitvi Izvajalske agencije za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno področje in kulturo ter razveljavitvi Sklepa 2009/336/ES
Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 empowers the Commission to delegate powers to the executive agencies to implement all or part of a Union programme or project, on its behalf and under its responsibility, in accordance with that Regulation.
Uredba (ES) št. 58/2003 pooblašča Komisijo, da v skladu s to uredbo v svojem imenu in pod svojo odgovornostjo prenese pooblastila za izvajanje celotnega ali dela programa ali projekta Unije na izvajalske agencije.
The purpose of entrusting the executive agencies with programme implementation tasks is to enable the Commission to focus on its core activities and functions which cannot be outsourced, without relinquishing control over, and ultimate responsibility for, activities managed by those executive agencies.
Komisija pooblašča izvajalske agencije za izvajanje programov z namenom, da bi se lahko osredotočila na ključne dejavnosti in naloge, ki jih ni mogoče oddati v izvajanje, ne da bi izgubila nadzor ali končno odgovornost za dejavnosti, ki jih upravljajo navedene izvajalske agencije.
By Decision 2005/56/EC [2], the Commission created the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (hereinafter referred to as the Agency) and entrusted it with the management of Community actions in the field of education, audiovisual and culture.
S Sklepom 2005/56/ES [2] je Komisija ustanovila Izvajalsko agencijo za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno področje in kulturo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in jo pooblastila za upravljanje dejavnosti Skupnosti na področjih izobraževanja, avdiovizualnih medijev in kulture.
The Commission amended the Agency’s mandate on several occasions, extending it to cover the management of new projects and programmes in the field of education, audiovisual, citizenship and youth and subsequently replaced Decision 2005/56/EC by Commission Decision 2009/336/EC [3].
Komisija je pooblastila Agencije večkrat spremenila zaradi njihove razširitve na upravljanje novih projektov in programov na področjih izobraževanja, avdiovizualnih medijev, državljanstva in mladih ter je posledično nadomestila Sklep 2005/56/ES s Sklepom Komisije 2009/336/ES [3].
In its Communication of 29 June 2011‘A budget for Europe 2020’ [4], the Commission proposed to use the option of more extensive recourse to existing executive agencies for the implementation of Union programmes in the next multiannual financial framework.
V sporočilu z dne 29. junija 2011„Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020“ [4] je Komisija predlagala, da se obstoječe izvajalske agencije še bolj izkoristijo za izvajanje programov Unije v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru.
The Agency has demonstrated a high level technical and financial expertise in the management of Union programmes.
Agencija je pokazala visoko raven tehničnega in finančnega strokovnega znanja in izkušenj pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti.
Satisfaction surveys conducted as part of the first and second interim evaluations of EACEA (2009 and 2013) show that beneficiaries and other stakeholders believe that EACEA delivers a better quality of service as compared to previous arrangements (Technical Assistance Office).
Ankete o zadovoljstvu, ki so bile izvedene v okviru prvega in drugega vmesnega vrednotenja EACEA (2009 in 2013), kažejo, da upravičenci in drugi deležniki menijo, da EACEA zagotavlja boljšo kakovost storitev v primerjavi s prejšnjo ureditvijo (Urad za tehnično pomoč).
EACEA is able to attract and retain highly qualified personnel, which in turn provides staffing stability.
EACEA je sposobna pritegniti in obdržati visokokvalificirano osebje, kar zagotavlja kadrovsko stabilnost.
The Agency continuously streamlines its internal operations to improve its efficiency and seeks to standardise approaches across programmes.
Za izboljšanje svoje učinkovitosti Agencija stalno racionalizira svoje interne dejavnosti in si prizadeva za standardizacijo pristopov med programi.
It benefits from its status as a public body specifically created to manage programmes in the area of education, audiovisual and culture and this focus enhances the visibility of the EU programmes among stakeholders and the general public.
Agencija ima status javnega organa, ustanovljenega izrecno za upravljanje programov na področjih izobraževanja, avdiovizualnih medijev ter kulture, in ta osredotočenost povečuje prepoznavnost programov EU med deležniki in širšo javnostjo.
The existence of a single entity managing a number of complementary programmes generates synergy effects in terms of visibility of EU action to the mutual benefit of all programmes.
Obstoj enotnega subjekta, ki upravlja več dopolnjujočih se programov, ustvarja sinergije v smislu prepoznavnosti delovanja EU v vzajemno korist vseh programov.
The ex-post control error rates are low for EACEA and well below the limit of 2 %.
Stopnje napak EACEA, ugotovljene z naknadnimi kontrolami, so nizke in precej pod mejo 2 %.
The second interim evaluation notes a steady improvement in EACEA’s technical and financial expertise which in turn is reflected in a general improvement in the Agency’s performance as observed in its KPIs.
Z drugo vmesno oceno je bil ugotovljen stalen napredek pri poglabljanju tehničnega in finančnega strokovnega znanja in izkušenj EACEA, kar se kaže v splošnem izboljšanju uspešnosti Agencije, kot so pokazali njeni ključni kazalniki uspešnosti.
In terms of the cost comparison with the ‘in-house option’, the cost-benefit analysis carried out in accordance with Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 found it would be more costly to manage the tasks at the Commission, by a margin of 23 % in net present value terms.
V smislu stroškovne primerjave z internimi možnostmi je analiza stroškov in koristi, izvedena v skladu s členom 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 58/2003, pokazala, da bi bilo dražje upravljati naloge znotraj Komisije, in sicer za 23 % v neto sedanji vrednosti.
The new programmes envisaged for delegation to EACEA are in line with the Agency’s current mandate and mission and represent a continuation of its existing activities.
Novi programi, za katere je predvideno, da se pooblastilo za njihovo izvajanje prenese na EACEA, so v skladu s sedanjimi pristojnostmi in pooblastili Agencije ter nadaljujejo njene sedanje dejavnosti.
The Agency has built up competence, skills and capacity in the management of these programmes over several years.
Agencija je v obdobju več let razvila znanje, spretnosti in zmožnosti za upravljanje teh programov.
The new programmes would therefore benefit from EACEA’s accumulated experience and expertise in programme management, and resultant productivity gains.
Novi programi bi tako imeli koristi od izkušenj in strokovnega znanja, ki jih je EACEA pridobila pri upravljanju programov, ter od povečane produktivnosti, ki iz tega izhaja.
A shift to an in-house arrangement would be disruptive as most programmes have never been managed internally by the parent DGs, which lack the capacity to manage programmes in-house.
Prehod na interno ureditev bi imel negativne posledice, saj večine programov matični generalni direktorati niso nikoli interno upravljali zaradi pomanjkanja zmogljivosti za interno upravljanje programov.
Delegation of programme management to EACEA would thus ensure business continuity for programme beneficiaries and stakeholders.
Tako bi se s prenosom upravljanja programov na EACEA zagotovila neprekinjenost izvajanja za upravičence programov in deležnike.
Delegation to EACEA will also continue to allow the Commission to better focus on its institutional tasks.
Poleg tega bo prenos na EACEA Komisiji še naprej omogočal osredotočenje na njene institucionalne naloge.
The Agency should be made responsible for implementing parts of the following new Union programmes and actions:
Agencija bi morala postati odgovorna za izvajanje delov naslednjih novih programov in dejavnosti Unije:
The Agency should remain responsible for implementing the following existing Union programmes and actions:
Agencija bi morala ostati odgovorna za izvajanje naslednjih obstoječih programov in dejavnosti Unije:
In order to ensure a consistent implementation in time of this Decision and of the programmes concerned, it is necessary to ensure that the Agency shall exercise its tasks linked to the implementation of those programmes subject to and from the date on which those programmes enter into force.
Za zagotovitev skladnega in pravočasnega izvajanja tega sklepa in zadevnih programov je treba zagotoviti, da Agencija izvaja svoje naloge, povezane z izvajanjem navedenih programov, pod pogojem in od dne začetka veljavnosti teh programov.
The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency should be established.
Ustanoviti bi bilo treba Izvajalsko agencijo za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno področje in kulturo.