natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
No scientific evidence or justification is given to support this factor.
Za ta faktor ni znanstvenih dokazov ali utemeljitev.
SCHER also notes that for some scenarios rather worst-case conditions were used.
SCHER prav tako ugotavlja, da so bili za nekatere scenarije uporabljeni najslabši možni pogoji.
For example, the calculations for phosphate applications on agricultural soils use application rates that are actually valid for less than 25 % of Swedish soils.
Pri izračunih za uporabo fosfata na kmetijskih zemljiščih so na primer uporabljene stopnje uporabe, ki veljajo za manj kakor 25 % švedskih tal.
The calculations of the water surface concentrations in the brooks after drainage seem problematic and the proposed levels do not correspond with the measured concentrations given elsewhere in the report.
Izračuni za koncentracije v površinskih vodah potokov po osuševanju so problematični, predlagane vrednosti pa ne ustrezajo izmerjenim koncentracijam, navedenimi drugje v poročilu.
The PNECs used in the Swedish risk assessment are those suggested in the EU RAR on cadmium and as such can be supported by SCHER.
Predvidene koncentracije brez učinka, uporabljene v švedski oceni tveganja, so enake tistim, ki jih predlaga poročilo oceni tveganja EU za kadmij, in jih SCHER lahko podpre.
The presented risk characterisation ratios (RCR) are thus solely dependent on the exposure assessment, i.e. the predicted cadmium concentrations in Swedish surface waters.
Stopnje opredelitve tveganja so tako odvisne samo od ocene izpostavljenosti, tj. pričakovane koncentracije kadmija v švedskih površinskih vodah.
The latter are dependent on the – unsubstantiated – soil/brook dilution factor.
Ta pa temelji na faktorju razredčitve med tlemi in potoki, ki ni utemeljen.
SCHER does not agree either with the assumption that there is no adsorption of cadmium in the soil.
SCHER se prav tako ne strinja s predpostavko, da tla ne adsorbirajo kadmija.
This will occur only if the soil is already heavily contaminated and no net adsorption occurs at steady state, which is not the situation in Sweden.
To se zgodi le takrat, ko so tla že močno onesnažena in ne pride do ustaljene neto adsorpcije, kar pa ne velja za Švedsko.
The Swedish report also assumes that there is no cadmium adsorption in soil occurring deeper than 30 cm, which is also not the case.
Švedsko poročilo tudi predpostavlja, da globlje od 30 centimetrov pod tlemi ne prihaja do adsorpcije kadmija, kar prav tako ne drži.
Consequently, SCHER does not support the results presented by the Swedish authorities for brooks, which is the only environmental compartment for which the Swedish authorities had identified risks.
Zato SCHER ne podpira rezultatov, ki so jih švedski organi predstavili za potoke, ki so edini del okolja, za katerega so ugotovili tveganje.
Nonetheless, SCHER recalls the earlier assessment of CSTEE in 2002, which estimated that cadmium concentrations in soil are expected not to increase in most European soils at a limit of 46 mg Cd/kg P. SCHER confirms that such estimate is still defendable including for Swedish agricultural soils and notes that the derivation was based on a ‘stand-still principle’, not on a risk assessment as performed by the Swedish authorities in their current justification.
Ne glede na to pa SCHER opozarja na prejšnjo oceno Znanstvenega odbora za strupenost, strupenost za ekosisteme in okolje iz leta 2002, ki ocenjuje, da koncentracije kadmija v tleh v večini evropskih držav ne bodo presegle 46 mg Cd/kg P. SCHER potrjuje, da takšna ocena še vedno upravičeno velja tudi za švedska kmetijska zemljišča in ugotavlja, da je odstopanje temeljilo na načelu mirovanja, ne pa na oceni tveganja, ki so jo opravili švedski organi v sedanji utemeljitvi.
Although, in its opinion of 27 February 2012, SCHER considers that the risk assessment report prepared by the Swedish authorities is of good scientific quality and contains new and relevant data, some uncertainties remain regarding certain key assumptions used by the Swedish authorities to conclude that there is a risk to aquatic organisms in small brooks in Sweden.
Čeprav v svojem mnenju z dne 27. februarja 2012 SCHER ocenjuje, da je znanstvena kakovost poročila o oceni tveganja švedskih organov dobra ter vsebuje nove in pomembne podatke, še vedno ostajajo nejasnosti glede nekaterih osrednjih predpostavk, ki so jih švedski organi uporabili pri zaključku, da obstaja tveganje za vodne organizme v majhnih potokih na Švedskem.
This will need further clarification from the Swedish authorities to allow the Commission to take a final position.
V zvezi s tem Komisija za sprejetje končnega stališča potrebuje dodatna pojasnila švedskih organov.
In their justification, the Swedish authorities identify risks for sensitive groups of the population (diabetics, people suffering from osteoporosis or iron deficiency).
V svoji utemeljitvi švedski organi ugotavljajo tveganja za občutljive skupine prebivalstva (diabetike, ljudi z osteoporozo ali pomanjkanjem železa).
These risks are caused by long-term exposure to cadmium through the diet.
Ta tveganja povzroča dolgotrajna izpostavljenost kadmiju v hrani.
Therefore, there is no danger to human health linked to a decision to extend the assessment of the Swedish situation for an additional period of six months.
Vendar pa odločitev za podaljšanje presoje švedskega primera za dodatnih šest mesecev ne more povzročiti nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi.
This additional period will allow the Commission to take into account further clarifications to be provided by the Swedish authorities in order to take a final decision.
V dodatnem obdobju bo Komisija lahko upoštevala dodatna pojasnila švedskih organov, preden bo sprejela končno odločitev.
Based on the above, the Commission considers that the conditions laid down in Article 114(6), third subparagraph, are met in order for it to have recourse to the possibility of extending the six-month period within which it has to approve or reject the national provisions notified by Sweden.
Glede na navedeno Komisija meni, da so izpolnjeni pogoji iz tretjega pododstavka člena 114(6) in se lahko uporabi možnost podaljšanja šestmesečnega roka, v katerem mora odobriti ali zavrniti nacionalne določbe iz uradnega obvestila Švedske.
In the light of the foregoing, it can be concluded that the request of the Kingdom of Sweden for introducing national provisions derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 is admissible.
Glede na navedeno je mogoče sklepati, da je prošnja Kraljevine Švedske za uvedbo nacionalnih določb, ki odstopajo od Uredbe (ES) št 2003/2003, dopustna.
However, in view of the complexity of the matter and of the absence of danger for human health by adopting the present Decision, the Commission considers it justified to extend the period referred to in Article 114(6), first paragraph, TFEU for a further period expiring on 18 October 2012,
Vendar pa zaradi zahtevnosti zadeve in zaradi dejstva, da sprejetje tega sklepa ne pomeni nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi, Komisija meni, da je upravičeno podaljšati rok iz prvega odstavka člena 114(6) PDEU, in sicer do 18. oktobra 2012 –
Pursuant to Article 114(6), third paragraph, TFEU, the period to approve or reject the envisaged national provisions on cadmium in fertilisers notified by the Kingdom of Sweden on 17 October 2011 pursuant to Article 114(5) TFEU is extended until 18 October 2012.
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 114(6) PDEU se rok za odobritev ali zavrnitev predvidenih nacionalnih določb za kadmij v gnojilih iz uradnega obvestila Kraljevine Švedske z dne 17. oktobra 2011 v skladu s členom 114(5) PDEU podaljša do 18. oktobra 2012.
OJ L 24, 30.1.1976, p. 21, replaced by Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003.
UL L 24, 30.1.1976, str. 21, ki jo nadomešča Uredba (ES) št. 2003/2003.
Replaced by Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003.
Nadomešča ga člen 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 2003/2003.
Swedish Code of Statutes (SFS Svensk Författningssamling) of 14 July 1998.
Švedska zbirka predpisov (SFS Svensk Förattningssamling) z dne 14. julija 1998.
Swedish Code of Statutes (SFS Svensk Författningssamling) of 4 June 2009.
Švedska zbirka predpisov (SFS Svensk Förattningssamling) z dne 4. junija 2009.
OJ C 309, 21.10.2011, p. 8 and OJ C 339, 19.11.2011, p. 24.
UL C 309, 21.10.2011, str. 8 in UL C 339, 19.11.2011, str. 24.
EU RAR, ECB 2007: European Union Risk Assessment Report cadmium oxide and cadmium metal, Volume 72 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute of Health and Consumer Protection.
EU RAR, ECB 2007: Poročilo Evropske unije o oceni tveganja kadmijevega oksida in kadmija, zvezek 72, Evropska komisija, Skupno raziskovalno središče, Inštitut za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov.
EFSA 2009: Scientific Opinion of the Panel on contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on cadmium in food.
EFSA 2009. Znanstveno mnenje Odbora za onesnaževalce v prehranski verigi na zahtevo Evropske komisije glede kadmija v hrani.
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/documents/specific-chemicals/fertilisers/cadmium/risk-assessment_en.htm
Na voljo na: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/documents/specific-chemicals/fertilisers/cadmium/risk-assessment_en.htm
The SCHER adopted its opinion on 27 February 2012 [12].
SCHER je o tem sprejel mnenje 27. februarja 2012 [12].
SCHER concluded that the risk assessment report prepared by the Swedish authorities is of good scientific quality and that in general the scenarios studied are appropriate and most parameter values used in the scenarios are acceptable.
SCHER je ugotovil, da je znanstvena kakovost poročila o oceni tveganja švedskih organov dobra, da so obravnavani scenariji primerni in da je večina uporabljenih vrednosti parametrov sprejemljiva.
on the signing on behalf of the European Union of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultrymeat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994, and of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Thailand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultrymeat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994
o podpisu Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Brazilijo v skladu s členom XXVIII Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT) 1994 o spremembi koncesij za predelano perutninsko meso, določenih v seznamu EU, ki je priložen GATT 1994, in Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Tajsko v skladu s členom XXVIII Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT) 1994 o spremembi koncesij za predelano perutninsko meso, določenih v seznamu EU, ki je priložen GATT 1994, v imenu Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 207(4) in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega odstavka člena 207(4), v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
On 25 May 2009 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations under Article XXVIII of the GATT 1994 with a view to the renegotiation of concessions on poultrymeat tariff lines under Chapter 16 of the Combined Nomenclature as provided for in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff [1] (hereinafter ‘CN’).
Dne 25. maja 2009 je Svet pooblastil Komisijo, da začne pogajanja na podlagi člena XXVIII GATT 1994 z namenom ponovnega pogajanja o koncesijah za tarifne postavke za perutninsko meso iz poglavja 16 kombinirane nomenklature, kakor je določena v členu 1 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 z dne 23. julija 1987 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: KN).
Those negotiations resulted in Agreements in the form of Exchanges of Letters initialled with Thailand on 22 November 2011 and with Brazil on 7 December 2011 (hereinafter ‘the Agreements’).
Ta pogajanja so se zaključila s sporazumi v obliki izmenjave pisem, ki sta bila s Tajsko oziroma z Brazilijo parafirana 22. novembra 2011 oziroma 7. decembra 2011 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazuma).
The Agreements should be signed,
Sporazuma bi bilo treba podpisati –
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign on behalf of the Union the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultrymeat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994, and the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Thailand pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions with respect to processed poultrymeat provided for in the EU Schedule annexed to GATT 1994 [2].
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za podpis Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Brazilijo v skladu s členom XXVIII Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT) 1994 o spremembi koncesij za predelano perutninsko meso, določenih v seznamu EU, ki je priložen GATT 1994, in Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Tajsko v skladu s členom XXVIII Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT) 1994 o spremembi koncesij za predelano perutninsko meso, določenih v seznamu EU, ki je priložen GATT 1994, v imenu Evropske unije [2].
OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.
UL L 256, 7.9.1987, str. 1
The texts of the Agreements will be published together with the decisions on their conclusion.
Besedilo Sporazumov se objavi skupaj s sklepoma o sklenitvi Sporazumov.
authorising Romania to apply measures derogating from Article 26(1)(a) and Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
o odobritvi Romuniji, da uporabi ukrepe, ki odstopajo od člena 26(1)(a) in člena 168 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost
By letter registered with the Commission on 27 September 2011, Romania requested authorisation to introduce special measures concerning certain motorised road vehicles derogating from those provisions laid down in Directive 2006/112/EC which govern a taxable person’s right to deduct VAT paid on the purchase of goods and services and those which require tax to be accounted for on business assets used for non-business purposes.
Romunija je z dopisom, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala dne 27. septembra 2011, zahtevala dovoljenje, da v zvezi z nekaterimi cestnimi motornimi vozili uvede posebne ukrepe, ki odstopajo od določb Direktive 2006/112/ES, ki urejajo pravico davčnih zavezancev do odbitka DDV, ki se plača ob nakupu blaga in storitev, in določb, ki zahtevajo, da se na poslovna sredstva, ki se uporabljajo za neposlovne namene, obračuna davek.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, by letter dated 1 December 2011, the Commission informed the other Member States of the request made by Romania.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 395(2) Direktive 2006/112/ES je Komisija z dopisom z dne 1. decembra 2011 obvestila druge države članice o zahtevi Romunije.
By letter dated 5 December 2011, the Commission notified Romania that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 5. decembra 2011 Romunijo obvestila, da ima vse informacije, ki jih potrebuje za presojo zahteve.
Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC establishes a taxable person’s right to deduct VAT charged on supplies of goods and services received by him for the purposes of his taxed transactions.
Člen 168 Direktive 2006/112/ES določa, da ima davčni zavezanec pravico odbiti DDV, obračunan pri dobavi blaga in storitev, prejetih z namenom, da jih uporabi v svojih obdavčenih transakcijah.
Point (a) of Article 26(1) of that Directive contains a requirement to account for VAT when a business asset is put to use for the private purposes of the taxable person or his staff or, more generally, for purposes other than those of his business.
Točka (a) člen 26(1) navedene direktive vsebuje zahtevo, da je DDV potrebno obračunati, če se poslovno sredstvo uporablja za zasebno rabo davčnega zavezanca ali za zasebno rabo njegovih zaposlenih ali splošneje za druge namene kot za namene njegove dejavnosti.
The non-business use of vehicles is difficult to identify accurately and even where it is possible, the mechanism for doing so is often burdensome.
Neposlovno rabo vozil je težko točno opredeliti, kadar pa je to izvedljivo, je zadevni postopek pogosto obremenjujoč.
Under the requested measures, the amount of VAT on expenditure eligible for deduction concerning motorised road vehicles which are not used exclusively for business purposes should, with some exceptions, be set at a flat percentage rate.
V skladu z zahtevanimi ukrepi je treba znesek DDV na izdatke, upravičene do odbitka za cestna motorna vozila, ki se ne uporabljajo le za poslovne namene, z nekaterimi izjemami določiti pavšalno.
Based on currently available information, Romania believes that a rate of 50 % is justifiable.
Na podlagi trenutno razpoložljivih informacij Romunija meni, da je stopnja 50 % upravičena.
At the same time, to avoid double taxation, the requirement for accounting for VAT on the non-business use of a motorised road vehicle should be suspended where it has been subject to this restriction.
Hkrati je treba za preprečitev dvojnega obdavčenja zahtevo za obračunavanje DDV na neposlovno rabo cestnega motornega vozila ukiniti, kadar zanj velja ta omejitev.
These measures can be justified by the need to simplify the procedure for charging VAT and to prevent evasion through incorrect record-keeping and false tax declaration.
Te ukrepe je mogoče utemeljiti s potrebo po poenostavitvi postopka za obračunavanje DDV in po preprečevanju davčnih utaj zaradi nepravilnega vodenja evidenc in napačnih davčnih napovedi.
The restriction on the right of deduction under the special measures should apply to VAT paid on the purchase, intra-Community acquisition, importation, hire or leasing of specified motorised road vehicles and on expenditure related thereto, including the purchase of fuel.
Omejitev pravice do odbitka v skladu s posebnimi ukrepi bi se morala uporabljati za DDV, ki se plača na nakup, nabavo znotraj Skupnosti, uvoz, najem ali zakup določenih cestnih motornih vozil in na z njimi povezane izdatke, vključno z nakupom goriva.
Certain types of motorised road vehicles should be excluded from the scope of the special measures since, due to their nature or the type of business they are used for, any non-business use thereof is considered to be negligible.
Nekatere vrste cestnih motornih vozil bi morale biti izključene iz področja uporabe posebnih ukrepov, saj se zaradi njihove narave oz. vrste dejavnosti, za katero se uporabljajo, kakršna koli neposlovna raba takšnih vozil šteje za zanemarljivo.
Therefore, the special measures should not apply to vehicles with more than nine seats including the driver’s, or with a maximum permissible laden mass of more than 3500 kilograms.
Zato se posebnih ukrepov ne bi smelo uporabljati za vozila z več kot devetimi sedeži, vključno z voznikovim, in z največjo dovoljeno težo obremenjenega vozila nad 3500 kg.
In addition, a detailed list of specific types of vehicles excluded from that restriction should be provided, based on their particular use.
Poleg tega bi bilo potrebno zagotoviti podroben seznam specifičnih vrst vozil, izključenih iz zgornje omejitve zaradi specifične rabe.
These derogating measures should be limited in time to allow for an evaluation of their effectiveness and of the appropriate percentage, since the proposed percentage is based on initial findings regarding business use.
Te ukrepe o odstopanju bi bilo treba časovno omejiti, da se lahko ocenita njihova učinkovitost in ustrezen odstotek, ker predlagani odstotek temelji na prvotnih ugotovitvah o poslovni rabi.
Where Romania considers an extension of the derogating measures is necessary, a report on the application of the measures in question, which includes a review of the percentage applied, should be submitted to the Commission together with the request for an extension in a timely manner.
Če Romunija meni, da bo potrebno podaljšati ukrepe o odstopanju, bi morala Komisiji pravočasno predložiti poročilo o uporabi ukrepa, ki vsebuje ponovni pregled uporabljenega odstotka, skupaj z zahtevkom za podaljšanje.
On 29 October 2004, the Commission adopted a proposal [2] for a Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC, now Directive 2006/112/EC, that includes the harmonisation of the categories of expenses for which exclusions from the right of deduction may apply.
Komisija je 29. oktobra 2004 sprejela predlog [2] za Direktivo Sveta o spremembi Direktive 77/388/EGS, zdaj Direktiva 2006/112/ES, ki vključuje harmonizacijo kategorij izdatkov, za katere lahko velja izključitev od pravice do odbitka.
Under that proposal, exclusions from the right to deduct could be applied to motorised road vehicles.
V skladu s tem predlogom se lahko izključitev od pravice do odbitka uporabi za cestna motorna vozila.
The derogating measures provided for in this Decision should expire on the date of the entry into force of such an amending Directive, if that date is earlier than the date of expiry provided for in this Decision.
Ukrepi o odstopanju iz tega sklepa bi morali prenehati veljati na datum začetka veljavnosti takšne direktive o spremembi, če navedeni datum nastopi pred datumom prenehanja veljavnosti iz tega sklepa.
The derogation will have only a negligible effect on the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the stage of final consumption and will have no impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from value added tax,
Odstopanje bo imelo zgolj zanemarljiv učinek na skupni znesek davčnih prihodkov, zbranih na stopnji končne porabe, in ne bo vplivalo na lastne vire Unije iz pobiranja davka na dodano vrednost –
By way of derogation from Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Romania is hereby authorised to limit to 50 % the right to deduct the VAT on the purchase, intra-Community acquisition, importation, hire or leasing of motorised road vehicles as well as the VAT charged on expenditure related to those vehicles, where the vehicle is not used exclusively for business purposes.
Z odstopanjem od člena 168 Direktive 2006/112/ES se Romuniji dovoli, da do 50 % omeji pravico do odbitka DDV na nakup, nabavo znotraj Skupnosti, uvoz, najem ali zakup cestnih motornih vozil in DDV na izdatke, povezane s takšnimi vozili, če se vozilo ne uporablja izključno v poslovne namene.
The restriction set out in the first subparagraph shall not apply to motorised road vehicles with a maximum permissible laden mass of more than 3500 kg or with more than nine seats including the driver’s seat.
Omejitev, določena v prvem odstavku, se ne uporablja za cestna motorna vozila z največjo dovoljeno težo obremenjenega vozila nad 3500 kg ali z več kot devetimi sedeži, vključno z voznikovim.
The first subparagraph of Article 1 shall not apply to the following categories of motorised road vehicles:
Prvi pododstavek člena 1 se ne uporablja za naslednje kategorije cestnih motornih vozil:
vehicles used exclusively for emergency services, for security, protection and courier services;
vozila, ki se uporabljajo izključno za intervencijske storitve, varnost in zaščito ter kurirske storitve;
vehicles used by sales agents and by purchasing agents;
vozila, ki jih uporabljajo prodajni in nabavni zastopniki;
vehicles used for the transport of passengers for consideration, including taxi services;
vozila, ki se uporabljajo za prevoz potnikov proti plačilu, vključno s taksiji;