natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC normal value is determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of that Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in point (c) of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is shown that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se normalna vrednost v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kjer se izkaže, da v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka prevladajo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
business decisions and costs are made in response to market signals and without significant State interference; and costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values,
poslovne odločitve in stroški so izvedeni kot odgovor na tržne signale in brez večjega vmešavanja države; stroški večjih vlaganj v glavnem odražajo tržne vrednosti,
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes,
podjetja imajo eno jasno določeno zbirko računovodskih evidenc, ki se revidirajo neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo v vse namene,
exchange rate conversions are carried out at market rates.
pretvorbe valut se opravljajo po tržnih menjalnih tečajih.
Noblelift, requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the deadlines given.
Noblelift je v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe zahteval TGO in je v danih rokih izpolnil obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
The investigation established that the prices paid by Noblelift in the RIP for Chinese hot-rolled carbon steel, a main raw material accounting for about 25 % of the cost of a finished product, were significantly distorted as they stood approximately between 24 % and 31 % below international prices over the same period.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so cene, ki jih plačuje Noblelift v OPP za kitajsko vroče valjano ogljično jeklo, ki je glavna surovina in predstavlja približno 25 % stroškov končnega proizvoda, bistveno izkrivljene, saj so bile približno 24 % do 31 % nižje, kot so bile mednarodne cene v istem obdobju.
The international prices were based on statistics for the Union and North American markets from the Steel Business Briefing [7] as well as from Comext import prices.
Mednarodne cene so temeljile na statističnih podatkih agencije Steel Business Briefing [7] za trge Unije in Severne Amerike, kot tudi na podatkih o izvoznih cenah COMEX.
On that basis it was found that Chinese steel prices clearly did not reflect market values.
Na podlagi teh podatkov je bilo jasno ugotovljeno, da kitajske cene jekla niso odražale tržnih vrednosti.
Moreover, there is an established practice of State interference in the market of raw materials.
Poleg tega obstaja ustaljena praksa vmešavanja države v trg surovin.
The China 12th five-year plan (2011-15) for the Iron and Steel sector contains a series of measures which demonstrate that steel companies have no possibility other than to act in line with the Chinese Government instructions due to the firm control the Chinese State has.
Dvanajsti petletni načrt Kitajske (za obdobje 2011–2015) za železarski in jeklarski sektor zajema vrsto ukrepov, ki kažejo na to, da jeklarska podjetja zaradi strogega nadzora, ki ga izvaja kitajska država, nimajo drugih možnosti, kot da delujejo v skladu z navodili kitajske vlade.
It is thus concluded that Noblelift does not fulfil the requirements of the first criterion of MET.
Zato se sklene, da Noblelift ne izpolnjuje določb iz prvega merila TGO.
Furthermore, in the financial year 2010, a related company gave Noblelift a bank guarantee for two loans representing a significant proportion of that related company’s and Noblelift’s total assets.
Poleg tega je v proračunskem letu 2010 povezana družba Noblelift podelila bančni poroštvi za dve posojili, ki predstavljata znaten delež tega povezanega podjetja in skupnih sredstev Noblelift.
The guarantees were disclosed neither in Noblelift’s financial statements nor in the related company’s accounts.
Ti poroštvi nista bili razkriti niti v računovodskih izkazih Noblelift niti v računih z njim povezane družbe.
This is not in line with IAS 24 (Related Party Disclosures) and the auditor had no reservation on this practice.
To ni skladno z MRS 24 (Razkrivanje povezanih strank), revizor pa ni imel pridržka za takšno prakso.
The disclosure of related party transactions in the financial statements is important because it draws attention to possible effects on the financial position of a company.
Razkritje transakcij s povezanimi strankami v računovodskih izkazih je pomembno, saj opozarja na možne učinke za finančni položaj družbe.
In this case, the non-disclosure of significant commitments such as the guarantees in question does not allow a proper assessment of the company’s operations and in particular the risks and opportunities the company is facing.
Dejstvo, da v tem primeru znatne obveznosti niso bile razkrite, kot na primer zadevni poroštvi, onemogoča ustrezno oceno delovanja družbe ter zlasti tveganj in priložnosti, s katerimi se podjetje sooča.
Therefore, it is considered that the company’s accounting records have not been properly audited in line with international accounting standards and, thus, it does not fulfil the requirements of the second criterion.
Zato se šteje, da računovodski izkazi niso bili ustrezno revidirani v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in zato ne izpolnjujejo določb iz drugega merila.
Finally, Noblelift received State benefits in the form of preferential income tax as well as grants which distort its financial situation and, thus, it does not fulfil the requirements of the third criterion.
Noblelift je prejel državno podporo v obliki preferencialnega davka na dohodek in nepovratna sredstva, ki izkrivljajo finančno stanje podjetja, zaradi česar to ne izpolnjuje določb iz tretjega pogoja.
The exporting producer concerned and the Union industry were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik in industrija Unije so imeli možnost podati pripombe na zgoraj navedene ugotovitve.
Following the disclosure of the MET findings, Noblelift requested more details with regard to the calculation of the international market price for steel.
Po razkritju ugotovitev o TGO je Noblelift zaprosil za podrobnosti o načinu izračuna mednarodnih cen jekla.
The company argued that distortions in raw material prices should be dealt with by adjusting the normal value in the dumping calculation rather than by denying MET.
Podjetje je navedlo, da bi bilo treba izkrivljanja cen surovin obravnavati s prilagajanjem normalne vrednosti v izračunu dampinga in ne z zavrnitvijo zahtevka za TGO.
However, Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation is very clear and requires that ‘costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values’.
Vendar je člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe jasen in določa, da „stroški za glavne vložke pa v glavnem odražajo tržne vrednosti“.
Hence, any adjustment in the dumping calculations in order to address the distorted input costs would render Article 2(7)(c) largely meaningless.
Zato bi se s kakršno koli prilagoditvijo v izračunih dampinga zaradi obravnavanja izkrivljenih stroškov vlaganj člen 2(7)(c) izkazal za zelo nesmiselnega.
The comments could therefore not alter the above findings.
Pripombe torej ne spremenijo zgornjih ugotovitev.
Following the disclosure of the final findings, Noblelift reiterated its arguments.
Po razkritju dokončnih ugotovitev je Noblelift ponovil svoje argumente.
It stated firstly that the Commission failed to disclose the details, i.e. all the data used for the calculation of differences in raw material prices.
Navedlo je, da Komisija ni razkrila podrobnosti, tj. vseh podatkov, ki so bili uporabljeni za izračun razlik v cenah surovin.
In this respect, it is noted first and foremost that the sources of data for the comparisons of steel prices have been indicated by the Commission on several occasions.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da je Komisija večkrat navedla vire podatkov za primerjave cen jekla.
The Commission repeated the explanations provided earlier in the proceeding that the prices based on the Steel Business Briefing were copyright protected as the service is available on subscription.
Komisija je ponovila pojasnila, ki jih je podala predhodno v postopku, tj. da so cene, ki temeljijo na podatkih agencije Steel Business Briefing, avtorsko zaščitene, saj je storitev na voljo naročnikom.
Consequently, the Commission is legally prevented from publicly disclosing those data directly but the database is otherwise available and can be accessed with payment of the appropriate fee.
Posledično je Komisiji neposredno razkritje teh podatkov pravno onemogočeno, vendar je zbirka podatkov na voljo in dostopna ob plačilu ustrezne pristojbine.
Nevertheless, in order to ensure a balance between the protection of intellectual property rights and the protection of the rights of defence, the data used was verified by the Hearing Officer of the Directorate-General for External Trade, who confirmed the calculation of the price difference and communicated the result of his verification to Noblelift.
Da bi se kljub temu zagotovilo ravnovesje med varstvom pravic intelektualne lastnine in pravice do obrambe, je uporabljene podatke preveril pooblaščenec za zaslišanje iz GD za trgovino, ki je potrdil izračun razlike v ceni in Noblelift sporočil rezultate svojega preverjanja.
It is further noted that the Steel Business Briefing describes exactly the methodology used (dimensions, thickness, width, point in transport).
Nadalje je bilo ugotovljeno, da agencija Steel Business Briefing natančno opisuje uporabljeno metodologijo (mere, debelino, širino, točka v prevozu).
Those parameters are general and are a guide which is also indicative of the level of detail in price comparisons of raw materials which aim at establishing whether costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values.
Ti parametri so splošni in služijo kot smernice, ki kažejo tudi raven natančnosti pri primerjavi cen surovin, katere namen je določiti, ali stroški večjih vlaganj v glavnem odražajo tržne vrednosti.
The Commission has used European and North American prices as reference.
Komisija je kot referenčne vrednosti uporabila evropske in severnoameriške cene.
Noblelift further claimed that in the original investigation, differences between domestic steel prices in the PRC and international steel prices were not considered as a factor preventing the company from meeting the first MET criterion.
Noblelift nadalje navaja, da razlike med mednarodnimi cenami jekla in cenami jekla v LRK v prvotni preiskavi niso bile dejavnik, zaradi katerega podjetje ne izpolnjuje prvega merila za TGO.
As stated in recital 22 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 128/2005 [8] of 27 January 2005 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty in the framework of the original investigation, ‘For all four companies, it was established (…) that costs and prices reflected market values’.
Uvodna izjava 22 k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 128/2005 z dne 27. januarja 2005 [8] o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve v okviru prvotne preiskave navaja: „Za vsa štiri podjetja je bilo ugotovljeno, […] da stroški in cene odražajo tržne vrednosti“.
Indeed, the original investigation did not establish a substantial price difference between raw materials procured locally in the PRC and those purchased at international prices.
Dejstvo je, da prvotna preiskava ni ugotovila bistvene razlike v ceni surovin, ki so bile nabavljene na domačem trgu v LRK in tistimi, ki so bile nabavljene po mednarodnih cenah.
However, this conclusion cannot prevent the institutions from finding a price difference in a later investigation should the circumstances be different and there is a price difference.
Vendar pa ta ugotovitev ne preprečuje institucijam, da v kasnejših preiskavah ugotavljajo obstoj razlike v ceni v primeru, da se okoliščine razlikujejo in da razlika v ceni dejansko obstaja.
As indicated in recital 76 below the circumstances have significantly changed since 2004 (time of the original investigation) and 2011 (the IP of the review at hand), i.e. in a period of seven years.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 76 so se okoliščine v obdobju sedmih let bistveno spremenile, tj. od leta 2004 (ko je bila izvedena prvotna preiskava) do leta 2011 (trenutno obdobje pod pregledom).
In this regard, and in particular during the expiry review investigation in 2010, prima facie evidence of price distortions in the steel market in the PRC, due to State interference, were collected.
V zvezi s tem so bili, zlasti v okviru pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov v letu 2010, zbrani dokazi prima facie o izkrivljanju cen na trgu jekla v LRK zaradi vmešavanja države.
This also constituted one of the reasons which led to the ex-officio initiation of the current review and indeed was confirmed in the current investigation (see recital 20 above).
To je tudi eden od razlogov, ki je pripeljal do začetka trenutnega pregleda po uradni dolžnosti, navedbe pa so bile dejansko potrjene v trenutni preiskavi (glej uvodno izjavo 20).
Next, Noblelift reiterated its comments concerning the non-material impact of loan guarantees or the negligible impact of state benefits.
Noblelift je nadalje ponovil svoje pripombe v zvezi z nebistvenim vplivom poroštev za posojila in zanemarljiv vpliv državne podpore.
In this respect, it is noted that Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation is clear and does not refer to material impact on financial results (‘firms have one set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes’).
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da so določbe člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe jasne in ne navajajo bistvenega vpliva na finančne rezultate („imajo podjetja jasno določeno zbirko računovodskih evidenc, ki se pregledujejo neodvisno, v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo v vse namene“).
In any case, as stated above in recital 21, the non-disclosure of significant commitments such as the loan guarantees in question does not allow a proper assessment of the company’s operations and in particular the risks and opportunities the company is facing.
Ne glede na to pa nerazkritje znatnih obveznosti, kot sta na primer zadevni poroštvi, onemogoča ustrezno oceno delovanja družbe ter zlasti tveganj in priložnosti, s katerimi se podjetje sooča, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 21.
As far as state benefits are concerned, the Commission has already replied to the party in the course of the investigation that those benefits represented amounts exceeding 10 million RMB.
Kar zadeva državno podporo, je Komisija stranki že med potekom preiskave odgovorila, da ta podpora predstavlja zneske, ki presegajo 10 milijonov RMB.
The claims could thus not be accepted.
Teh trditev zato ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
Finally, Noblelift argued that the investigation should have been terminated due to violation of the three-month deadline for the MET determination as specified in Article 2(7)(c) the basic Regulation.
Nazadnje je Noblelift navedel, da bi se preiskava morala končati zaradi kršitve tri-mesečnega roka za oceno o TGO, kot določa člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect, reference is made to an amendment introduced by Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [9] and the retroactive effects thereof.
V zvezi s tem se navaja sklic na spremembo, ki jo uvaja Uredba (EU) št. 1168/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2012 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [9] in retroaktivnemu učinku navedene uredbe.
Further, it is noted that the MET determination was made more than three months after the beginning of the investigation due to the procedural aspects and time constraints of the investigation.
Poleg tega je treba omeniti, da je bila ocena o TGO izvedena več kot tri mesece po začetku preiskave zaradi postopkovnih vidikov in časovnih omejitev preiskave.
Indeed, the increased complexity of issues raised in the context of MET assessments has shown that the three-month deadline was virtually impossible to adhere to.
Dejansko se je izkazalo, da je zaradi povečane zapletenosti vprašanj, ki so bila odprta v okviru ocene o TGO, tri-mesečni rok praktično nemogoče spoštovati.
It is noted however that the timing of the determination did not have an impact on the outcome.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da čas, ki je bil potreben za oceno, ni vplival na rezultat.
Consequently, it is concluded that the comments suggesting that MET should be granted are not justified.
Posledično se sklepa, da pripombe, v zvezi z odobritvijo TGO niso utemeljene.
In view of the above and pursuant to Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, it is determined not to grant MET to Noblelift.
Glede na navedeno in v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe se Noblelift TGO ne odobri.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, for non-market economy countries and, to the extent that MET could not be granted, for countries in transition, normal value has to be established on the basis of the price or constructed value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je treba za države brez tržnega gospodarstva in, v kolikor se TGO ne more odobriti, za države v prehodu, normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the original investigation, Canada served as an analogue country for the purposes of establishing a normal value.
V prvotni preiskavi je bila kot primerljiva država za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabljena Kanada.
Given that production in Canada had ceased, Brazil was envisaged as an analogue country in the Notice of initiation of the present review.
Ker je proizvodnja v Kanadi prenehala, je bila v obvestilu o začetku sedanjega pregleda za primerljivo državo določena Brazilija.
Two exporting producers and an importer objected to the proposal to use Brazil as an analogue country.
Predlogu Brazilije kot primerljive države sta ugovarjala dva proizvajalca izvoznika in en uvoznik.
The arguments against the choice of Brazil were that there was a low degree of competition on the Brazilian market for hand pallet trucks due to the very small number of domestic producers and, thus, sales prices, profits as well as production costs in Brazil are inflated.
Argumenti proti izboru Brazilije so bili, da je raven konkurence na brazilskem trgu za ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet nizka zaradi zelo majhnega števila domačih proizvajalcev, zaradi česar so prodajne cene, dobički in proizvodni stroški v Braziliji napihnjeni.
The exporting producers in question suggested India, Malaysia or Taiwan as appropriate analogue countries.
Zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki so kot primerne primerljive države predlagali Indijo, Malezijo ali Tajvan.
Following those comments, the Commission contacted 38 Indian, 3 Taiwanese, 2 Malaysian and 2 Brazilian known producers of hand pallet trucks by sending them the relevant questionnaire.
Na podlagi teh pripomb je Komisija stopila v stik z znanimi proizvajalci ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet, tako da je poslala ustrezne vprašalnike 38 indijskim, trem tajvanskim in dvema malezijskima proizvajalcema.
Cooperation could be obtained from only one producer in Brazil: Paletrans.
Sodelovanje je bilo mogoče zagotoviti samo z enim proizvajalcem iz Brazilije: Paletrans.
Following the disclosure of the final findings and the Commission’s proposal, parties reiterated their comments that Brazil was not an appropriate choice of analogue country due to the lack of competition on the Brazilian market.
Po razkritju dokončnih ugotovitev in predloga Komisije, so stranke ponovno poudarile svoje pripombe, da Brazilija ni ustrezna primerljiva država zaradi pomanjkanja konkurence na brazilskem trgu.
Parties alleged that the cooperating analogue country producer enjoyed a monopolistic position on the Brazilian market reinforced by high import duties.
Stranke so navedle, da sodelujoči proizvajalec iz primerljive države uživa monopolni položaj na brazilskem trgu, ki ga krepijo visoke uvozne dajatve.
Other comments related to deficiencies in the non-confidential questionnaire reply of the analogue country producer.
Druge pripombe se nanašajo na pomanjkljivosti v odgovoru na vprašalnik, ki ga je poslal proizvajalec iz primerljive države in ni zaupne narave.
Finally, it was claimed that adjustments should be made to account for differences between the analogue country producer and the exporting producer in the country concerned.
Nazadnje so navedli, da bi bilo treba opraviti prilagoditve, ki bi upoštevale razlike med proizvajalcem iz primerljive države in proizvajalcem izvoznikom v zadevni državi.
As concerns the suitability of Brazil as an analogue country, it has to be pointed out that while the analogue country producer is the main producer on the Brazilian market, it does not monopolise that market.
Glede primernosti Brazilije kot primerljive države je treba poudariti, da čeprav je zadevni proizvajalec v primerljivi državi največji proizvajalec na brazilskem trgu, sam ne monopolizira tega trga.
There is competition with at least two local producers and a significant level of imports, and the profit margin of the analogue country producer has been found to be consistent with an open market.
Obstaja konkurenca z vsaj dvema lokalnima proizvajalcema, delež uvoza je precejšen, ugotovljeno pa je bilo tudi, da je stopnja dobička proizvajalca iz primerljive države združljiva z odprtim trgom.
As stated in recital 36 above, following comments at the early stage of the proceeding against the use of Brazil as an analogue country, the Commission contacted 45 producers in four different countries, including the companies suggested by Noblelift.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 36, je Komisija glede na pripombe v zgodnji fazi postopka, ki so izražale nasprotovanje izboru Brazilije kot primerljive države, vzpostavila stik s 45 proizvajalci iz štirih različnih držav, vključno z družbami, ki jih je predlagal Noblelift.
Despite repeated contacts by telephone and e-mail with these companies, only one producer from Brazil submitted the requested information and cooperated with the investigation.
Kljub večkratnim telefonskim klicem in izmenjavo elektronske pošte s temi družbami je zahtevane informacije posredoval samo en proizvajalec iz Brazilije in s tem sodeloval pri preiskavi.
With regard to the alleged deficiencies it has to be noted that only one producer in the analogue country cooperated with the investigation.
Glede na domnevne pomanjkljivosti je treba opozoriti, da je pri preiskavi sodeloval le en proizvajalec iz primerljive države.
Such a situation is not uncommon, but poses difficulties with regard to the disclosure of data.
Takšna okoliščina ni neobičajna, a predstavlja težave glede razkritja podatkov.
Given frequent difficulties in obtaining cooperation from analogue country producers, the Commission has to guarantee a high level of protection of confidential information.
Zaradi pogostih težav pri zagotavljanju sodelovanja proizvajalcev iz primerljive države, mora Komisija zagotoviti visoko raven zaščite zaupnih informacij.
In the current case, the presentation of non-confidential data created some misunderstandings concerning alleged deficiencies but they were clarified with the parties.
V tem postopku je objava nezaupnih podatkov povzročila nekaj nesporazumov glede domnevnih pomanjkljivosti, vendar so bile te strankam pojasnjene.