natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards the types of product that were not profitable, normal value was constructed using the cost of manufacturing of the Brazilian producer plus SG&A and profit for the product types of the Brazilian producer that are profitable.
Za vrste izdelka, ki niso bile dobičkonosne, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana z uporabo proizvodnih stroškov brazilskega proizvajalca, ki so se jim prišteli prodajni, splošni in upravni stroški ter dobiček v zvezi z dobičkonosnimi vrstami izdelka brazilskega proizvajalca.
As all cooperating exporting producers granted IT made export sales to the Union directly to independent customers in the Union, the export prices were based on the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Ker so vsi sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim je bila odobrena IO, izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, so bile izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določene na podlagi izvoznih cen zadevnega izdelka, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
The normal value and export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bila izvedena na podlagi franko tovarna.
The dumping margins were established by comparing the individual ex-works prices of the sampled exporters to the domestic sales prices of the analogue producer or to the constructed normal value as appropriate.
Za določitev stopnje dampinga so se posamezne cene franko tovarna vzorčenih izvoznikov primerjale z domačimi prodajnimi cenami primerljivega proizvajalca ali konstruirano normalno vrednostjo, kot je ustrezno.
Adjustments were made, where appropriate, in respect of level of trade, differences in physical characteristics and for other factors affecting price comparability, notably ‘branding’.
Po potrebi so bile izvedene prilagoditve v zvezi s stopnjo trgovine, razlikami v fizikalnih značilnostih in drugimi dejavniki, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen, zlasti „trženje blagovne znamke“.
First, it was examined whether a level of trade adjustment under Article 2(10)(d) of the basic Regulation was warranted.
Najprej se je preverilo, ali je bila prilagoditev stopnje trgovine v skladu s členom 2(10)(d) osnovne uredbe utemeljena.
In this respect it was found that the Chinese exports were essentially made at wholesale level whereas the sales in the analogue country were also made at retail level.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Kitajska izvažala večinoma na ravni trgovine na debelo, medtem ko je bila prodaja v primerljivi državi izvedena tudi v obliki prodaje na drobno.
The investigation further established that on both markets the different distribution chains affected the price level thus affecting fair price comparability between export price and normal value.
Preiskava je pokazala tudi, da so različne distribucijske verige na obeh trgih vplivale na raven cen in s tem na pošteno primerljivost izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti.
Furthermore, the investigation also demonstrated that the majority of Chinese export sales were made in large quantities while the majority of domestic sales in the analogue country were made in smaller quantities resulting in price differences on the same level of trade on the two relevant markets.
Preiskava je poleg tega pokazala, da je Kitajska večinoma izvažala v velikih količinah, večina domače prodaje v primerljivi državi pa je bila izvedena v manjših količinah, zaradi česar so se cene na enaki ravni trgovine na zadevnih trgih razlikovale.
Accordingly, in order to make a fair comparison between the export price and the normal value, the normal value was adjusted on the basis of the price differences within the same level of trade in the analogue country and, where appropriate, on the price differences found in respect of the quantities sold at each level of trade.
Da bi bila primerjava med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo poštena, je bila normalna vrednost prilagojena na podlagi razlik v ceni na isti ravni trgovine v primerljivi državi in po potrebi razlik v ceni, ugotovljenih glede na prodane količine na posamezni ravni trgovine.
Second, it was examined whether an adjustment under Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation for differences in physical characteristics was warranted.
Nato se je preverilo, ali je bila prilagoditev razlik v fizikalnih značilnostih v skladu s členom 2(10)(a) osnovne uredbe utemeljena.
In this regard the investigation established that Chinese exporting producers qualify their products in up to five different grades ranging from A to E with significant price differences.
V zvezi s tem je preiskava pokazala, da kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki svoje izdelke razvrščajo v največ pet različnih skupin od A do E, katerih cene se zelo razlikujejo.
The vast majority of export to the Union consists, however, of A-grade, B-grade or C-grade or a combination thereof.
Velika večina izvoza v Unijo zajema skupine A, B in C ali njihovo kombinacijo.
This grading is however not universal or based on any general industry wide standards but is rather company specific and allows for price differentiation.
Vendar to razvrščanje ni splošno in ne temelji na splošnih standardih industrije, ampak je specifično za posamezne družbe in omogoča razlikovanje cen.
On the other hand, the analogue country producer only sell the equivalent of grade A on the domestic Brazilian market and price comparability was therefore found to be affected.
Na drugi strani proizvajalec primerljive države na domačem brazilskem trgu prodaja le izdelke, podobne izdelkom iz skupine A, zaradi česar je bil ugotovljen vpliv na primerljivost cen.
Accordingly, the export price was adjusted upwards to Chinese A-grade level in order to be comparable with the product sold by the analogue producer on the Brazilian market.
Izvozna cena je bila zato navzgor prilagojena stopnji kitajske skupine A, da bi bila primerljiva ceni izdelka, ki ga primerljivi proizvajalec prodaja na brazilskem trgu.
Third, the investigation established that the Brazilian producer only sells branded products on the Brazilian market whereas the Chinese exporting producers do not sell branded products but rather — so called - ‘private label’ products or generic ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Preiskava je pokazala tudi, da brazilski proizvajalec na brazilskem trgu prodaja le proizvode z blagovno znamko, pri čemer kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki ne prodajajo proizvodov z blagovno znamko, ampak t. i. „izdelke zasebnih blagovnih znamk“ ali generično keramično namizno in kuhinjsko posodo.
Branded products are normally perceived by customers to be products signifying a certain prestige, assured quality and design thus commanding higher market prices whereas generic (private label) products, whilst having the same physical and technical characteristics, are usually sold at considerably lower price levels.
Stranke običajno štejejo izdelke z blagovno znamko za izdelke z določenim ugledom, zagotovljeno kakovostjo in obliko, kar pomeni višje tržne cene, pri čemer se generični izdelki (izdelki lastnih blagovnih znamk), ki imajo enake fizikalne in tehnične značilnosti, običajno prodajajo po znatno nižjih cenah.
While the additional value of a branded product cannot generally be exactly quantified as it depends on many different factors, such as customer perception, brand recognition and other non-quantifiable factors, the Brazilian producer has, in this particular case, confirmed that its ceramic branded products can be sold at significantly higher prices on the Brazilian market than other non-branded (generic) products.
Čeprav dodane vrednosti izdelka z blagovno znamko običajno ni mogoče natančno količinsko opredeliti, ker nanjo vpliva veliko različnih dejavnikov, kot so dojemanje potrošnikov, prepoznavanje cene in drugih dejavnikov, ki niso količinsko opredeljivi, je brazilski proizvajalec v tem primeru potrdil, da se lahko njegovi keramični izdelki z blagovno znamko na brazilskem trgu prodajo po bistveno višjih cenah kot drugi izdelki brez blagovnih znamk (generični izdelki).
Accordingly, a further adjustment was made to the normal value pursuant to Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila normalna vrednost v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe dodatno prilagojena.
Further adjustments were made, where appropriate, in respect of transport, insurance, handling and ancillary costs, packing, credit, bank charges and commissions in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by evidence.
Kadar je bilo ustrezno, so bile dodatne prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški prevoza, zavarovanjem, manipulativnimi stroški in drugimi s tem povezanimi stroški, stroški pakiranja, kredita, provizije in bančnimi stroški izvedene v vseh primerih, v katerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da so smiselne, točne in podprte z dokazi.
Pursuant to Articles 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margins for the exporting producers granted IT were established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value established for the analogue country, as adjusted with each company’s weighted average export price, as adjusted, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe so bile stopnje dampinga za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bila odobrena IO, določene na podlagi primerjave prilagojene tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti, določene za primerljivo državo, z vsako prilagojeno tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno posamezne družbe, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve.
A weighted average of the sampled exporting producers’ dumping margins was calculated for the cooperating exporting producers not selected in the sample.
Za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso bili izbrani v vzorec, je bilo izračunano tehtano povprečje stopenj dampinga vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
On this basis the provisional dumping margin for the non-sampled exporting producers, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid is 26,6 %.
Na podlagi tega je začasna stopnja dampinga za nevzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, 26,6 %.
In order to calculate the country-wide dumping margin applicable to the non-cooperating or unknown exporting producers in the PRC, the level of cooperation was first established by comparing the volume of exports to the Union reported by the cooperating exporting producers with the equivalent Eurostat statistics.
Da bi se izračunala stopnja dampinga na ravni države, ki se uporabi za nesodelujoče ali neznane proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK, je bila najprej ugotovljena raven sodelovanja, in sicer s primerjavo obsega izvoza v Unijo, ki so ga prijavili sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, z enakovrednimi Eurostatovimi statističnimi podatki.
In this investigation, cooperation from the PRC was considered high for a fragmented industry since the exporting producers that came forward represent over 60 % of total exports from the PRC to the Union of the product concerned.
V tej preiskavi se je sodelovanje LRK štelo za visoko glede na razdrobljeno industrijo, saj proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so se javili, predstavljajo več kot 60 % celotnega izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Unijo.
Therefore, the country-wide margin applicable to all other exporting producers was established by using the weighted average of the highest dumping margins established for representative product types and volume of the sampled exporting producers.
Zato je bila stopnja dampinga na ravni države za druge proizvajalce izvoznike določena na podlagi tehtanega povprečja najvišjih stopenj dampinga, ki so bile določene za reprezentativne vrste in količine izdelka vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
On this basis the country-wide level of dumping was provisionally established at 58,8 % of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid.
Na podlagi tega je bila stopnja dampinga na ravni države začasno določena na 58,8 % cene CIF meja unije brez plačane dajatve.
Hunan Hualian China Industry Co., Ltd; Hunan Hualian Ebillion Industry Co., Ltd; Hunan Liling Hongguanyao China Industry Co., Ltd and Hunan Hualian Yuxiang China Industry Co., Ltd
Hunan Hualian China Industry Co., Ltd; Hunan Hualian Ebillion Industry Co., Ltd; Hunan Liling Hongguanyao China Industry Co., Ltd in Hunan Hualian Yuxiang China Industry Co., Ltd
Non-sampled cooperating exporting producers
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso bili zajeti v vzorec
All available information concerning Union producers, including the data reported in the complaint and subsequent submissions in respect of the producers that did not come forward in this investigation was used to establish the total Union production.
Za določitev celotne proizvodnje Unije so se uporabile vse razpoložljive informacije o proizvajalcih Unije, vključno s podatki iz pritožbe in naknadnih pripomb glede proizvajalcev, ki se niso javili v tej preiskavi.
The total Union production of the like product was estimated by extrapolating data provided by the European and national associations, cross-checked with data provided by individual producers and also with research and statistical sources.
Celotna proizvodnja podobnega izdelka v Uniji je bila ocenjena z ekstrapoliranjem podatkov, ki so jih predložila evropska in nacionalna združenja in ki so bili navzkrižno preverjeni s podatki, ki so jih predložili posamezni proizvajalci, ter raziskovalnimi in statističnimi viri.
During the IP, the like product was manufactured in the Union by more than 200 Union producers.
V OP je podobni izdelek v Uniji proizvajalo več kot 200 proizvajalcev Unije.
On the basis referred to in the previous recital, the total Union production was estimated to be around 240200 tonnes during the IP.
Na podlagi navedenega v prejšnji uvodni izjavi je bilo ocenjeno, da celotna proizvodnja Unije v OP znaša približno 240200 ton.
The Union producers accounting for the total Union production constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation and will be thereafter referred to as the ‘Union industry’.
Proizvajalci Unije, ki predstavljajo celotno proizvodnjo Unije, pomenijo industrijo Unije v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: industrija Unije).
The Union industry was divided into two segments: SMEs and larger companies.
Industrija Unije je bila razdeljena na dva dela: mala in srednje velika podjetja ter velike družbe.
SMEs accounted for 42 % of the total Union production in that period.
Mala in srednje velika podjetja so predstavljala 42 % celotne proizvodnje Unije v navedenem obdobju.
Indeed, the Union production is highly fragmented, though concentrated in Czech Republic, French Republic (France), Germany, Italy, Republic of Poland (Poland), Portuguese Republic (Portugal), Romania, Kingdom of Spain (Spain) and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (United Kingdom).
Proizvodnja Unije je dejansko zelo razdrobljena, vendar zgoščena v Češki republiki, Francoski republiki (Franciji), Nemčiji, Italiji, Republiki Poljski (na Poljskem), Portugalski republiki (na Portugalskem), Romuniji, Kraljevini Španiji (Španiji) ter Združenem kraljestvu Velike Britanije in Severne Irske (Združenem kraljestvu).
The Union consumption was established on the basis of Eurostat import statistics for the product under investigation and submissions regarding Union industry sales on the Union market.
Potrošnja Unije je bila določena na podlagi statističnih podatkov Eurostata o uvozu izdelka v preiskavi in pripomb glede prodaje industrije Unije na domačem trgu.
On this basis, the Union consumption developed as follows:
Na podlagi tega je bila potrošnja Unije naslednja:
The consumption of ceramic tableware and kitchenware in the Union overall decreased during the period considered by 12 %.
Potrošnja keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode v Uniji se je v obravnavanem obdobju skupno zmanjšala za 12 %.
The main decrease by 17 % happened between 2008 and 2009.
Najbolj se je zmanjšala med letoma 2008 in 2009, in sicer za 17 %.
Based on Eurostat data, the volume, market share and average prices of imports of the product concerned developed as set out below:
Na podlagi Eurostatovih podatkov so obseg, tržni delež in povprečne cene uvoza zadevnega izdelka naslednje:
Average import price (EUR/tonne)
Povprečna uvozna cena (EUR/tona)
The volume of total imports from China decreased by 9 % over the period considered and amounted to 485814 tonnes during the IP.
Obseg celotnega uvoza iz Kitajske se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 9 % in je v OP obsegal 485814 ton.
However, in percentage terms, it should be noted that imports from China decreased less than the overall EU consumption.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da se je uvoz iz Kitajske v smislu deleža zmanjšal za manj kot skupna potrošnja v EU.
Indeed, when analysed from the perspective of the whole period considered, the market share of Chinese imports increased from 64,8 % in 2008 to 66,9 % in the IP.
Tržni delež kitajskega uvoza, analiziran z vidika celotnega obravnavanega obdobja, se je dejansko povečal s 64,8 % leta 2008 na 66,9 % v OP.
The import price increased by 17,7 % during the period considered, from 1274 EUR/tonne to 1499 EUR/tonne.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je uvozna cena povečala za 17,7 %, tj. s 1274 EUR/tono na 1499 EUR/tono.
This is the average import price per tonne of all imports of the product concerned and therefore, the trend could be affected by changes in the product mix.
To je povprečna uvozna cena na tono celotnega uvoza zadevnega izdelka, zato bi lahko spremembe v ponudbi vplivale na gibanje.
For the purposes of price undercutting, the weighted average sales prices of the sampled Union producers to unrelated customers on the Union market, adjusted to an ex-works level, i.e. excluding freight costs in the Union and after deduction of discounts and rebates, were compared to the corresponding weighted average prices of the cooperating exporters from the PRC to the first independent customer on the Union market, i.e. net of discounts and adjusted where necessary to CIF Union frontier price and also duly adjusted for existing customs duties, customs clearance costs and post-importation costs.
Za ugotovitev nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen se je tehtano povprečje prodajnih cen vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, zaračunanih nepovezanim strankam na trgu Unije in prilagojenih na raven franko tovarna, tj. brez stroškov prevoza v Uniji ter po odbitku popustov in rabatov, primerjalo z ustreznim tehtanim povprečjem cen sodelujočih izvoznikov iz LRK, zaračunanih prvi neodvisni stranki na trgu Unije, tj. brez popustov in po potrebi prilagojenih cenam CIF meja Unije ter tudi ustrezno prilagojenih zaradi obstoječih carinskih dajatev, stroškov carinjenja in stroškov po uvozu.
Prices of lower-grades products were adjusted to A-grade level prices as lower grade products were, from a consumer perspective, found to be competing with A-grade products as also concluded in recital 61 above.
Cene izdelkov iz nižjih skupin so bile prilagojene cenam skupine A, saj so bili izdelki iz nižje skupine z vidika potrošnika konkurenčni izdelkom iz skupine A, kot je ugotovljeno tudi v uvodni izjavi (61).
Union industry prices were also adjusted for differences in level of trade and to neutralize the price element linked to branding, if applicable.
Tudi cene industrije Unije so bile prilagojene zaradi razlik v stopnji trgovine in izravnave cenovnega elementa, povezanega s trženjem blagovne znamke, če je bilo to ustrezno.
The comparison showed that during the IP the dumped products concerned originating in the PRC sold in the Union undercut the Union industry’s sales prices, when expressed as a percentage of the latter, by 26,3 % to 47,6 %.
Primerjava je pokazala, da se je v OP zadevni dampinški izdelek iz LRK v Uniji prodajal po cenah, ki so nelojalno znižale prodajne cene industrije Unije za 26,3 % do 47,6 %.
The macroeconomic indicators (production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, employment, productivity and magnitude of dumping margins) were assessed at the level of the whole Union industry.
Makroekonomski kazalci (proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost, izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, obseg prodaje, tržni delež, zaposlenost, produktivnost in višina stopenj dampinga) so bili ocenjeni na ravni celotne industrije Unije.
The assessment was based on the information provided by European and national associations, cross-checked with data provided by Union producers and available official statistics.
Ocena je temeljila na informacijah, ki so jih predložila evropska in nacionalna združenja ter so bile navzkrižno preverjene s podatki, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci Unije, in uradnimi javnimi statističnimi podatki.
The analysis of microeconomic indicators (stocks, sale prices, profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investments, ability to raise capital, wages and cost of production) was carried out at the level of the sampled Union producers.
Analiza mikroekonomskih kazalcev (zaloge, prodajne cene, dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb, zmožnost zbiranja kapitala, plače in proizvodni stroški) je bila izvedena na ravni vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
For some microeconomic indicators (sales price, profitability, return on investments and cost of production) the results of the sampled companies in the specific segment have been weighted in accordance with the share of that segment in the total Union production (using the specific weight in terms of production volumes of each segment in the total ceramic tableware sector – 42 % for SMEs, 58 % for non-SMEs).
Za nekatere mikroekonomske kazalce (prodajne cene, dobičkonosnost, donosnost naložb in proizvodni stroški) so se rezultati vzorčenih družb v posebnem segmentu tehtali v skladu z deležem tega segmenta v celotni proizvodnji Unije (s specifično težo v smislu obsega proizvodnje posameznega segmenta v celotnem sektorju keramične namizne posode, tj. 42 % za mala in srednje velika podjetja ter 58 % za druge družbe).
As a consequence it has been ensured that the results of large companies did not distort the injury analysis but that the situation of the smaller companies, collectively accounting for a large share of the Union production, was properly reflected where possible.
Tako je bilo zagotovljeno, da rezultati velikih družb niso izkrivljali analize škode, ampak da se je primerno upoštevalo stanje manjših družb, ki skupaj predstavljajo velik delež proizvodnje Unije, kadar je bilo to mogoče.
Over the period considered, the production, production capacity and capacity utilisation of the Union industry developed as set out below.
V obravnavanem obdobju so bile proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti industrije Unije naslednje:
The production of the Union industry decreased by 15 % over the period considered.
Proizvodnja industrije Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 15 %.
In overall terms, the reduction is more pronounced than the decrease of Union consumption over the same period.
Na splošno je bilo zmanjšanje proizvodnje v istem obdobju večje kot zmanjšanje potrošnje Unije.
Production did not pick up in the same way consumption did in 2010.
Proizvodnja se leta 2010 ni okrepila v enakem obsegu kot potrošnja.
The Union’s industry production capacity decreased by 13 % over the period considered.
Proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 13 %.
In spite of this, the industry’s capacity utilisation rate further decreased during the period considered, overall by 2 % to 74,1 %.
Kljub temu se je stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti v zadevnem obdobju dodatno znižala, tj. skupno za 2 % do 74,1 %.
Sales of the Union industry on the Union market to unrelated customers fell at a higher rate (8 % more) than the decrease in consumption during the period considered.
Obseg prodaje industrije Unije nepovezanim strankam na domačem trgu se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za več (za 8 % več), kot se je zmanjšala potrošnja.
It is noted that between 2009 and 2010 the sales volume continued to fall while Union consumption increased by 8 %.
Ugotavlja se, da se je obseg prodaje med letoma 2009 in 2010 še naprej zmanjševal, medtem ko se je potrošnja povečala za 8 %.