natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to facilitate access to European patents with unitary effect, in particular for SMEs, applicants should be able to file their patent applications at the EPO in any official language of the Union.
Da se olajša dostop do evropskih patentov z enotnim učinkom, zlasti za MSP, bi bilo treba prijaviteljem omogočiti, da svoje patentne prijave pri EPU vložijo v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Unije.
As a complementary measure, certain applicants obtaining European patents with unitary effect, having filed a European patent application in one of the official languages of the Union, which is not an official language of the EPO, and having their residence or principal place of business within a Member State, should receive additional reimbursements of the costs of translating from the language of the patent application into the language of the proceedings of the EPO, beyond what is currently in place at the EPO.
Kot dopolnilni ukrep bi morali prijavitelji z bivališčem ali glavnim krajem poslovanja v državi članici, ki so vložili prijavo za evropski patent v enem izmed uradnih jezikov Unije, ki pa ni uradni jezik EPU, dobiti povračilo stroškov prevajanja iz jezika prijave v jezik postopka pri EPU ne glede na obstoječe postopke EPU.
Such reimbursements should be administered by the EPO in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012.
Ta povračila bi moral v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012 nositi EPU.
In order to promote the availability of patent information and the dissemination of technological knowledge, machine translations of patent applications and specifications into all official languages of the Union should be available as soon as possible.
Zaradi spodbujanja razpoložljivosti patentnih informacij in razširjanja tehnološkega znanja bi moralo biti čim prej na voljo strojno prevajanje patentnih prijav in spisov v vse uradne jezike Unije.
Machine translations are being developed by the EPO and are a very important tool in seeking to improve access to patent information and to widely disseminate technological knowledge.
EPU razvija strojno prevajanje, ki je zelo pomembno orodje pri izboljševanju dostopa do patentnih informacij in obsežnem razširjanju tehnološkega znanja.
The timely availability of high quality machine translations of European patent applications and specifications into all official languages of the Union would benefit all users of the European patent system.
Pravočasna razpoložljivost visokokakovostnih strojnih prevodov evropskih patentnih prijav in spisov v vse uradne jezike Unije bi koristila vsem uporabnikom evropskega patentnega sistema.
Machine translations are a key feature of European Union policy.
Strojni prevodi so pomembna značilnost politike Evropske unije.
Such machine translations should serve for information purposes only and should not have any legal effect.
Ti strojni prevodi bi se morali uporabljati le v informativne namene in ne bi smeli imeti kakršnega koli pravnega učinka.
During the transitional period, before a system of high quality machine translations into all official languages of the Union becomes available, a request for unitary effect as referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 should be accompanied by a full translation of the specification of the patent into English where the language of the proceedings before the EPO is French or German, or into any official language of the Member States that is an official language of the Union where the language of the proceedings before the EPO is English.
V prehodnem obdobju, tj. dokler ni na voljo visokokakovostnega strojnega prevajanja v vse uradne jezike Unije, bi se moral zahtevku za enotni učinek iz člena 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012 priložiti celoten prevod patentnega spisa v angleščino, kadar je jezik postopka pred EPU francoščina ali nemščina, ali v kateri koli drug uradni jezik držav članic, ki je uradni jezik Unije, kadar je jezik postopka pred EPU angleščina.
Those arrangements would ensure that during a transitional period all European patents with unitary effect are made available in English which is the language customarily used in the field of international technological research and publications.
S to ureditvijo bi se zagotovilo, da so v prehodnem obdobju vsi evropski patenti z enotnim učinkom na voljo v angleščini, ki se običajno uporablja v mednarodnih tehnoloških raziskavah in publikacijah.
Furthermore, such arrangements would ensure that with respect to European patents with unitary effect, translations would be published in other official languages of the participating Member States.
Poleg tega bi se s to ureditvijo zagotovilo, da bi bili objavljeni prevodi evropskih patentov z enotnim učinkom v druge uradne jezike sodelujočih držav članic.
Such translations should not be carried out by automated means and their high quality should contribute to the training of translation engines by the EPO.
Ti prevodi ne bi smeli biti opravljeni avtomatizirano, njihova visoka kakovost pa bi morala prispevati k razvoju prevajalskih orodij v okviru EPU.
They would also enhance the dissemination of patent information.
Z njimi bi se tudi okrepilo razširjanje patentnih informacij.
The transitional period should terminate as soon as high quality machine translations into all official languages of the Union are available, subject to a regular and objective evaluation of the quality by an independent expert committee established by the participating Member States in the framework of the European Patent Organisation and composed of the representatives of the EPO and the users of the European patent system.
Prehodno obdobje bi se moralo zaključiti takoj, ko je na voljo visokokakovostno strojno prevajanje v vse uradne jezike Unije, katerega kakovost bi redno in objektivno ocenjeval neodvisni strokovni odbor, ki bi ga ustanovile sodelujoče države članice v okviru EPU ter ki bi bil sestavljen iz predstavnikov EPU in uporabnikov evropskega patentnega sistema.
Given the state of technological development, the maximum period for the development of high quality machine translations cannot be considered to exceed 12 years.
Glede na stanje tehnološkega napredka bi bilo treba visokokakovostno strojno prevajanje razviti najpozneje v 12 letih.
Consequently, the transitional period should lapse 12 years from the date of application of this Regulation, unless it has been decided to terminate that period earlier.
Posledično bi se moralo prehodno obdobje izteči 12 let po datumu začetka uporabe te uredbe, razen če se sprejme odločitev o predčasnem koncu tega obdobja.
Since the substantive provisions applicable to a European patent with unitary effect are governed by Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 and are completed by the translation arrangements provided for in this Regulation, this Regulation should apply from the same date as Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012.
Ker materialne določbe, ki se uporabljajo za evropski patent z enotnim učinkom, ureja Uredba (EU) št. 1257/2012 in ker so dopolnjene z ureditvijo prevajanja iz te uredbe, bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati od istega dne kot Uredba (EU) št. 1257/2012.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the rules governing the languages of the Institutions of the Union established in accordance with Article 342 of the TFEU and to Council Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community [3].
Ta uredba ne posega v ureditev glede jezikov v institucijah Unije, določeno v skladu s členom 342 PDEU in Uredbo Sveta št.1 z dne 15. aprila 1958 o določitvi jezikov, ki se uporabljajo v Evropski gospodarski skupnosti [3].
This Regulation is based on the linguistic regime of the EPO and should not be considered as creating a specific linguistic regime for the Union, or as creating a precedent for a limited language regime in any future legal instrument of the Union.
Ta uredba temelji na jezikovni ureditvi EPU in se ne bi smela obravnavati, kot da vzpostavlja posebno jezikovno ureditev za Unijo ali precedens za omejeno jezikovno ureditev v kakršnem koli bodočem pravnem instrumentu Unije.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the creation of a uniform and simple translation regime for European patents with unitary effect, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reasons of the scale and effects of this Regulation, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, where appropriate by means of enhanced cooperation, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te uredbe, in sicer uvedbe enotne in poenostavljene ureditve prevajanja za evropske patente z enotnim učinkom, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov te uredbe lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe, kadar je to ustrezno z okrepljenim sodelovanjem, v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
This Regulation implements enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection authorised by Decision No 2011/167/EU with regard to the applicable translation arrangements.
Ta uredba uvaja okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva, ki je bilo odobreno s Sklepom 2011/167/EU, v zvezi z veljavno ureditvijo prevajanja.
‘European patent with unitary effect’ means a European patent which benefits from unitary effect in the participating Member States by virtue of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012;
„evropski patent z enotnim učinkom“ pomeni evropski patent, ki ima enotni učinek v sodelujočih državah članicah na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012;
‘Language of the proceedings’ means the language used in the proceedings before the EPO as defined in Article 14(3) of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973, as revised on 17 December 1991 and on 29 November 2000 (hereinafter ‘EPC’).
„jezik postopka“ pomeni jezik postopka, ki se uporablja v postopkih pred EPU, kakor je opredeljeno v členu 14(3) Konvencije o podeljevanju evropskih patentov z dne 5. oktobra 1973, kakor je bila revidirana 17. decembra 1991 in 29. novembra 2000 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EPK).
Translation arrangements for the European patent with unitary effect
Ureditev prevajanja za evropski patent z enotnim učinkom
Without prejudice to Articles 4 and 6 of this Regulation, where the specification of a European patent, which benefits from unitary effect has been published in accordance with Article 14(6) of the EPC, no further translations shall be required.
Brez poseganja v člena 4 in 6 te uredbe se dodatni prevodi ne zahtevajo, kadar je bil spis evropskega patenta, ki ima enotni učinek, objavljen v skladu s členom 14(6) EPK.
A request for unitary effect as referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 shall be submitted in the language of the proceedings.
Zahtevek za enotni učinek iz člena 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012 se predloži v jeziku postopka.
Translation in the event of a dispute
Prevod v primeru spora
In the event of a dispute relating to an alleged infringement of a European patent with unitary effect, the patent proprietor shall provide at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the European patent with unitary effect into an official language of either the participating Member State in which the alleged infringement took place or the Member State in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
V primeru spora v zvezi z domnevno kršitvijo evropskega patenta z enotnim učinkom imetnik patenta na zahtevo in po izbiri domnevnega kršitelja zagotovi celoten prevod evropskega patenta z enotnim učinkom v uradni jezik sodelujoče države članice, v kateri se je zgodila domnevna kršitev, ali države članice v kateri ima domnevni kršitelj bivališče.
In the event of a dispute relating to a European patent with unitary effect, the patent proprietor shall provide in the course of legal proceedings, at the request of a court competent in the participating Member States for disputes concerning European patents with unitary effect, a full translation of the patent into the language used in the proceedings of that court.
V primeru spora v zvezi z evropskim patentom z enotnim učinkom imetnik patenta med sodnim postopkom na zahtevo sodišča, pristojnega za spore o evropskih patentih z enotnim učinkom v sodelujočih državah članicah, zagotovi celoten prevod patenta v jezik, ki se uporablja v postopku pred navedenima sodiščem.
The cost of the translations referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be borne by the patent proprietor.
Stroške prevodov iz odstavkov 1 in 2 krije imetnik patenta.
In the event of a dispute concerning a claim for damages, the court hearing the dispute shall assess and take into consideration, in particular where the alleged infringer is a SME, a natural person or a non-profit organisation, a university or a public research organisation, whether the alleged infringer acted without knowing or without reasonable grounds for knowing, that he was infringing the European patent with unitary effect before having been provided with the translation referred to in paragraph 1.
V primeru spora o odškodninskem zahtevku sodišče, ki obravnava spor, zlasti v primeru, ko je domnevni kršitelj MSP, fizična oseba ali neprofitna organizacija, univerza ali zavod za javne raziskave, oceni in upošteva ali je domnevni kršitelj, preden je prejel prevod iz odstavka 1, ravnal ne da bi vedel oziroma upravičeno ni mogel vedeti, da krši evropski patent z enotnim učinkom.
Administration of a compensation scheme
Upravljanje sistema nadomestil
Given the fact that European patent applications may be filed in any language under Article 14(2) of the EPC, the participating Member States shall in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012, give, within the meaning of Article 143 of the EPC, the EPO the task of administering a compensation scheme for the reimbursement of all translation costs up to a ceiling, for applicants filing patent applications at the EPO in one of the official languages of the Union that is not an official language of the EPO.
Glede na to, da se evropske patentne prijave lahko vložijo v katerem koli jeziku iz člena 14(2) EPK, sodelujoče države članice v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012, v okviru člena 143 EPK dodelijo EPU nalogo upravljanja sistema nadomestil za povračilo vseh stroškov prevajanja do določene zgornje meje prijaviteljem, ki pri EPU vložijo patentne prijave v enem od uradnih jezikov Unije, ki ni uradni jezik EPU.
The compensation scheme referred to in paragraph 1 shall be funded through the fees referred to in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 and shall be available only for SMEs, natural persons, non-profit organisations, universities and public research organisations having their residence or principal place of business within a Member State.
Sistem nadomestil iz odstavka 1 temelji na pristojbinah iz člena 11 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012 in je na voljo le za MSP, fizične osebe, neprofitne organizacije, univerze in zavode za javne raziskave, ki imajo svoje bivališče ali glavni kraj poslovanja v državi članici.
During a transitional period starting on the date of application of this Regulation a request for unitary effect as referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 shall be submitted together with the following:
V prehodnem obdobju, ki se začne na dan začetka uporabe te uredbe, se zahtevku za enotni učinek iz člena 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012 priložita:
where the language of the proceedings is French or German, a full translation of the specification of the European patent into English; or
celoten prevod spisa evropskega patenta v angleščino, kadar je jezik postopka francoščina ali nemščina, ali
where the language of the proceedings is English, a full translation of the specification of the European patent into any other official language of the Union.
celoten prevod spisa evropskega patenta v kateri koli drug uradni jezik Unije, kadar je jezik postopka angleščina.
In accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012, the participating Member States shall give, within the meaning of Article 143 of the EPC, the EPO the task of publishing the translations referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article as soon as possible after the date of the submission of a request for unitary effect as referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012.
V skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012 sodelujoče države članice v okviru člena 143 EPK dodelijo EPU nalogo, da prevode iz odstavka 1 tega člena objavi čim prej po datumu predložitve zahtevka za enotni učinek iz člena 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012.
The text of such translations shall have no legal effect and shall be for information purposes only.
Besedilo teh prevodov nima nikakršnega pravnega učinka in se uporablja le v informativne namene.
Six years after the date of application of this Regulation and every two years thereafter, an independent expert committee shall carry out an objective evaluation of the availability of high quality machine translations of patent applications and specifications into all the official languages of the Union as developed by the EPO.
Neodvisni strokovni odbor šesto leto od datuma začetka uporabe te uredbe in nato vsaki dve leti objektivno oceni razpoložljivost visokokakovostnega strojnega prevajanja patentnih prijav in spisov v vse uradne jezike Unije, ki ga razvija EPU.
This expert committee shall be established by the participating Member States in the framework of the European Patent Organisation and shall be composed of representatives of the EPO and of the non-governmental organisations representing users of the European patent system invited by the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation as observers in accordance with Article 30(3) of the EPC.
Ta strokovni odbor ustanovijo sodelujoče države članice v okviru Evropske patentne organizacije ter je sestavljen iz predstavnikov EPU in nevladnih organizacij, ki zastopajo uporabnike evropskega patentnega sistema in jih upravni svet Evropske patentne organizacije povabi kot opazovalce v skladu s členom 30(3) EPK.
On the basis of the first of the evaluations referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article and every two years thereafter on the basis of the subsequent evaluations, the Commission shall present a report to the Council and, if appropriate, make proposals for terminating the transitional period.
Na podlagi prve izmed ocen iz odstavka 3 tega člena in nato vsaki dve leti po tem na podlagi naknadnih ocen Komisija predloži Svetu poročilo in po potrebi predlaga zaključek prehodnega obdobja.
If the transitional period is not terminated on the basis of a proposal of the Commission, it shall lapse 12 years from the date of application of this Regulation.
Če se prehodno obdobje ne konča na predlog Komisije, se izteče po 12 letih od datuma začetka uporabe te uredbe.
It shall apply from 1 January 2014 or the date of entry into force of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, whichever is the later.
Uporablja se od 1. januarja 2014 ali od dneva začetka veljavnosti sporazuma o enotnem patentnem sodišču, karkoli nastopi pozneje.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1261/2012
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1261/2012
fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Black Sea
o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki se za leto 2013 uporabljajo v Črnem morju
Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy [1] requires that measures governing access to waters and resources and the sustainable pursuit of fishing activities be established taking into account available scientific advice and, in particular, the report drawn up by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike [1] zahteva, da se določijo ukrepi, ki urejajo dostop do voda in virov ter trajnostno opravljanje ribolovnih dejavnosti, ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih znanstvenih mnenj in zlasti poročila, ki ga pripravi Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo (STECF).
The total allowable catch (TACs) should be established on the basis of the available scientific advice, taking into account biological and socioeconomic aspects whilst ensuring fair treatment between fishing sectors, as well as in the light of the opinions expressed during the consultation of stakeholders.
Celotni dovoljeni ulov (TAC) mora biti določen na podlagi razpoložljivega znanstvenega mnenja ob upoštevanju bioloških in družbeno-gospodarskih vidikov ter ob zagotavljanju pravične obravnave med ribiškimi sektorji in upoštevanju mnenj, izraženih med posvetovanjem z zainteresiranimi stranmi.
The use of fishing opportunities set out in this Regulation should be subject to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy [2] and in particular to Articles 33 and 34 thereof concerning respectively the recording of catches and fishing effort and the notification of data on the exhaustion of fishing opportunities.
Uporaba ribolovnih možnosti, kot je določeno v tej uredbi, bi morala biti predmet Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 z dne 20. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike [2], zlasti člena 33 navedene uredbe o evidentiranju ulova in ribolovnega napora in člena 34 navedene uredbe glede obvestila o podatkih o izčrpanju ribolovnih možnosti.
It is therefore necessary to specify the codes to be used by the Member States when sending data to the Commission relating to landings of stocks subject to this Regulation.
Zato je treba določiti oznake, ki jih države članice uporabljajo pri pošiljanju podatkov Komisiji v zvezi z iztovarjanji staležev, za katere velja ta uredba.
In accordance with Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 of 6 May 1996 introducing additional conditions for year-to-year management of TACs and quotas [3], the stocks that are subject to the various measures referred to therein must be identified.
V skladu s členom 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 847/96 z dne 6. maja 1996 o uvedbi dodatnih pogojev za upravljanje celotnih dovoljenih ulovov (TAC) in kvot iz leta v leto [3] je treba navesti staleže, za katere veljajo razni ukrepi, določeni v navedeni uredbi.
In order to avoid interruption of fishing activities and to ensure the livelihood of Union fishermen, it is important to open these fisheries on 1 January 2013.
Da bi se izognili prekinitvi ribolovnih dejavnosti in da bi ribičem Unije zagotovili preživetje, je pomembno, da se ta ribolovna območja odprejo 1. januarja 2013.
For reasons of urgency, this Regulation should enter into force immediately after its publication,
Ta uredba bi morala iz nujnih razlogov začeti veljati nemudoma po objavi –
This Regulation fixes the fishing opportunities for 2013 for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in the Black Sea.
Ta uredba določa ribolovne možnosti za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki se za leto 2013 uporabljajo v Črnem morju.
‘Black Sea’ means geographical sub-area 29 as defined in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area [4] and in the resolution GFCM/33/2009/2;
„Črno morje“ pomeni zemljepisno podobmočje 29, kot je opredeljeno v Prilogi I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1343/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o nekaterih določbah za ribolov na območju Sporazuma GFCM (Generalne komisije za ribištvo v Sredozemlju) [4] in Resoluciji GFCM/33/2009/2;
‘quota’ means a proportion of the TAC allocated to the Union, a Member State or a third country.
„kvota“ pomeni delež TAC, ki je dodeljen Uniji, državi članici ali tretji državi.