natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That Decision provides that the ANSES is to document the appraisal of laboratories in third countries that have applied to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines.
Navedena odločba določa, da mora ANSES dokumentirati oceno laboratorijev v tretjih državah, ki so se prijavili za izvajanje seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini.
By adopting Commission Implementing Decision 2012/304/EU of 11 June 2012 authorising laboratories in Croatia and in Mexico to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines [2], the Commission authorised the laboratory for rabies and general virology of the Croatian Veterinary Institute to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines in dogs, cats and ferrets.
S sprejetjem Izvedbenega sklepa Komisije 2012/304/EU z dne 11. junija 2012 o odobritvi laboratorijev na Hrvaškem in v Mehiki za izvajanje seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini [2] je Komisija odobrila laboratorij za steklino in splošno virologijo znotraj Hrvaškega veterinarskega inštituta za izvajanje seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini pri psih, mačkah in belih dihurjih.
Following the unfavourable appraisal report established by the ANSES dated 3 September 2012, the authorisation granted to that laboratory has been withdrawn in accordance with Commission Decision 2010/436/EU of 9 August 2010 implementing Council Decision 2000/258/EC as regards proficiency tests for the purposes of maintaining authorisations of laboratories to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines [3].
Po negativnem ocenjevalnem poročilu urada ANSES z dne 3. septembra 2012 je bila odobritev, izdana navedenemu laboratoriju, preklicana v skladu s Sklepom Komisije 2010/436/EU z dne 9. avgusta 2010 o izvajanju Odločbe Sveta 2000/258/ES glede testiranja strokovne usposobljenosti za namene ohranitve odobritev laboratorijev za izvajanje seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini [3].
The competent authority of Croatia has submitted an application for re-approval of the laboratory for rabies and general virology of the Croatian Veterinary Institute which is supported by a favourable appraisal report established for that laboratory by the ANSES dated 15 February 2013.
Pristojni organ Hrvaške je vložil vlogo za ponovno odobritev laboratorija za steklino in splošno virologijo znotraj Hrvaškega veterinarskega inštituta, ki ji je bilo priloženo pozitivno ocenjevalno poročilo za navedeni laboratorij urada ANSES z dne 15. februarja 2013.
The competent authority of Croatia has also officially informed the Commission that the name of the laboratory has changed.
Pristojni organ Hrvaške je prav tako uradno obvestil Komisijo, da se je ime laboratorija spremenilo.
That laboratory should therefore be authorised to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines in dogs, cats and ferrets.
Navedeni laboratorij bi bilo zato treba odobriti za izvajanje seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini pri psih, mačkah in belih dihurjih.
In accordance with Article 3(2) of Decision 2000/258/EC, the following laboratory is authorised to perform the serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines in dogs, cats and ferrets:
V skladu s členom 3(2) Odločbe 2000/258/ES se za izvajanje seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini pri psih, mačkah in belih dihurjih odobri naslednji laboratorij:
This Decision shall apply from 1 June 2013.
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. junija 2013.
Done at Brussels, 17 May 2013.
V Bruslju, 17. maja 2013
amending Implementing Decision 2012/362/EU concerning a financial contribution by the Union to certain Member States to support voluntary surveillance studies on honeybee colony losses, as regards extending the deadline for those Member States’ programmes on those studies
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/362/EU o finančnem prispevku Unije za nekatere države članice za podporo neobveznih študij spremljanja izgub kolonij medonosnih čebel glede podaljšanja roka za navedene programe držav članic za navedene študije
(notified under document C(2013) 2785)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 2785)
(Only the Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem, danskem, estonskem, finskem, francoskem, grškem, italijanskem, latvijskem, litvanskem, madžarskem, nemškem, nizozemskem, poljskem, portugalskem, slovaškem, španskem in švedskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 23 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2009/470/ES z dne 25. maja 2009 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1], zlasti člena 23 Odločbe,
Commission Implementing Decision 2012/362/EU [2], provides for Union financial assistance to be granted to Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom for their surveillance study programmes on honeybee colony losses for the period from 1 April 2012 to 30 June 2013.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2012/362/EU [2] predvideva, da se finančna pomoč Unije odobri Belgiji, Danski, Nemčiji, Estoniji, Grčiji, Španiji, Franciji, Italiji, Latviji, Litvi, Madžarski, Poljski, Portugalski, Slovaški, Finski, Švedski in Združenemu kraljestvu za programe študij spremljanja izgub kolonij medonosnih čebel za obdobje od 1. aprila 2012 do 30. junija 2013.
The Guidelines for a pilot surveillance project on honeybee colony losses [3] of the European Union Reference Laboratory for honeybee health provides guidance to Member States on their surveillance study programmes on honeybee colony losses.
Smernice za poskusni projekt spremljanja izgub kolonij medonosnih čebel [3] referenčnega laboratorija Evropske unije za zdravje medonosnih čebel državam članicam nudijo napotke za programe študij spremljanja izgub kolonij medonosnih čebel.
It provides that three controls be carried out in selected apiaries and that the last control be carried out during the honey production season in order to objectively estimate the number of lost or weakened colonies.
Smernice določajo, da se v izbranih čebelnjakih izvedejo trije pregledi in da se zadnji pregled opravi v sezoni za proizvodnjo medu, da se lahko objektivno oceni število izgubljenih ali oslabljenih kolonij.
The period should be selected by the Member State depending on its specific climatic characteristics.
Država članica bi morala obdobje izbrati glede na svoje posebne podnebne značilnosti.
Certain Member States have requested that the period of the surveillance study programmes on honeybee colony losses, provided for in Implementing Decision 2012/362/EU, be extended after 30 June 2013, as taking account of the geographical location of those Member States and seasonal conditions, it could be impossible to complete their programmes before that date.
Nekatere države članice so zahtevale, da se obdobje za programe študij spremljanja izgub kolonij medonosnih čebel, določeno v Izvedbenem sklepu 2012/362/EU, podaljša po 30. juniju 2013, ker ob upoštevanju geografskega položaja navedenih držav članic in sezonskih razmer svojih programov morda ne bi mogle zaključiti pred navedenim datumom.
In order to make it possible for all Member States taking part in the surveillance study programmes on honeybee colony losses to conclude the third round of visits in summer, it is necessary to amend the end date provided for in Implementing Decision 2012/362/EU from 30 June 2013 to 30 September 2013.
Da bi vse države članice, vključene v programe študij spremljanja izgub kolonij medonosnih čebel, lahko zaključile tretji krog ogledov poleti, je treba spremeniti rok iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/362/EU s 30. junija 2013 na 30. september 2013.
Implementing Decision 2012/362/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeni sklep 2012/362/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Article 1(2)(a) of Implementing Decision 2012/362/EU, ‘30 June 2013’ is replaced by ‘30 September 2013’.
V členu 1(2)(a) Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/362/EU se datum „30. junija 2013“ nadomesti z datumom „30. septembra 2013“.
OJ L 176, 6.7.2012, p. 65.
UL L 176, 6.7.2012, str. 65.
of 21 May 2013
z dne 21. maja 2013
rejecting the proposal for a Council implementing regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in India, Taiwan and Thailand following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and terminating the expiry review proceeding concerning imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Indonesia and Malaysia, in so far as the proposal would impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in India, Taiwan and Thailand
o zavrnitvi predloga izvedbene uredbe Sveta o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Indije, Tajvana in Tajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 ter o zaključku postopka pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa glede uvoza nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Indonezije in Malezije, če bi predlog uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Indije, Tajvana in Tajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], and in particular Articles 9(4) and 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], ter zlasti člena 9(4) in člena 11(2) Uredbe,
The Council has accepted the Commission’s proposal to maintain these countervailing measures.
Svet je sprejel predlog Komisije, naj se ti izravnalni ukrepi ohranijo.
According to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (the Basic anti-dumping Regulation), measures will expire after a period unless expiry of a measure would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Na podlagi člena 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 (osnovna protidampinška uredba) se ukrepi po določenem obdobju iztečejo, razen če bi po izteku ukrepa verjetno prišlo do nadaljevanja ali do ponovnega pojava dampinga in škode.
Article 11(2) also says that the likelihood of recurrence may be indicated by evidence:
V členu 11(2) je tudi navedeno, da na verjetnost ponovnega pojavljanja lahko kažejo dokazi:
of continued dumping and injury; or
o nadaljevanju dampinga in škode ali
that the removal of injury is partly or solely due to the existence of measures; or
da je odstranitev škode deloma ali v celoti posledica obstoja ukrepov ali
that the circumstances of the exporters, or market conditions, are such that they would indicate the likelihood of further injurious dumping.
da so okoliščine, v katerih se nahajajo izvozniki, ali pa okoliščine na trgu take, da kažejo na verjetnost nadaljevanja škodljivega dampinga.
Finally, Article 11(2) says that conclusions are to be reached with due account taken of all relevant and duly documented evidence presented in relation to the question as to whether the expiry of measures would be likely, or unlikely, to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
V členu 11(2) je navedeno še, da se sprejmejo sklepi ob primernem upoštevanju vseh relevantnih in ustrezno dokumentiranih dokazov, predloženih v zvezi z vprašanjem, ali je verjetno oziroma ni verjetno, da bi konec ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovno pojavljanje dampinga in škode.
The Council agrees that there is no likelihood that Indonesian or Malaysian exporting producers will resume exporting injurious quantities at dumped prices to the Union market in the short or medium term should measures be repealed.
Svet se strinja, da ni verjetno, da bi indonezijski ali malezijski proizvajalci izvozniki kratko- ali srednjeročno nadaljevali z izvozom škodljivih količin na trg Unije po dampinških cenah, če bi se ukrepi razveljavili.
However, the Council view is that the case has not been made that the removal of anti-dumping measures against India, Taiwan and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or resumption of injurious dumping.
Vendar meni, da ni dokazano, da bi odprava protidampinških ukrepov zoper Indijo, Tajvan in Tajsko verjetno povzročila nadaljevanje ali ponovitev škodljivega dampinga.
It further concludes that the reimposition of measures would clearly be against the overall Union interest.
Svet nadalje sklepa, da bi bila ponovna uvedba ukrepov očitno v nasprotju s splošnim interesom Unije.
The Council is of the opinion that 13 years has in this instance been enough to allow European industry to adapt to the global competition and recover substantially.
Svet meni, da je bilo v tem primeru 13 let dovolj, da bi evropski industriji omogočili prilagoditev globalni konkurenci in znatno okrevanje.
In addition, the main export markets for PET are growing and the global demand for PET-packaged products is likely to expand further as the world economy recovers.
Poleg tega glavni izvozni trgi za PET rastejo in svetovno povpraševanje po proizvodih, ki so v PET embalaži, se bo ob okrevanju svetovnega gospodarstva verjetno še naprej širilo.
The Council’s assessment, based on the evidence in the proposal, is that the EU industry is not currently suffering material injury.
Svet na podlagi dokazov iz predloga ocenjuje, da industrija EU trenutno ni utrpela materialne škode.
RECURRENCE OF INJURY
PONOVITEV ŠKODE
The Council has also examined whether the recurrence of material injury would be likely if the measures were allowed to lapse.
Svet je tudi preučil, ali bi lahko prišlo do ponovitve materialne škode, če bi bilo dovoljeno, da se ukrepi iztečejo.
The Council’s assessment is that this would not be likely to happen.
Ocenjuje, da do tega verjetno ne bi prišlo.
Productivity has increased in the period covered by the Expiry Review.
V obdobju, ki ga zajema pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa, se je produktivnost povečala.
EU industry consistently holds over 70 % of the EU market and prices, profitability, return on investment and cash flow figures are significantly improving.
Industrija EU dosledno pokriva 70 % trga EU, cene, dobičkonosnost, donosnost naložb in denarni tok pa se bistveno izboljšujejo.
The trends show that the market developments cannot be regarded as temporary.
Trendi kažejo, da razvoj dogodkov na trgu ni začasen.
These developments would allow EU producers to compete with the imports from the countries concerned without leading to recurrence of material injury.
Takšen razvoj dogodkov bi omogočil, da bi bili proizvajalci EU konkurenčni uvozu iz zadevnih držav brez ponovitve materialne škode.
In addition, import prices have increased significantly during the last number of years and thus price pressure is diminishing.
Poleg tega so se cene uvoza v zadnjih letih bistveno zvišale, tako da se cenovni pritisk zmanjšuje.
Imports from the countries concerned are not significant in terms of their share of the EU market (still below 4 % in RIP) and in relation to imports from other countries and EU producers sales.
Uvoz iz zadevnih držav ni pomemben, kar zadeva njegov delež na trgu EU (še vedno pod 4 % v OPP) ter v primerjavi z uvozom iz drugih držav in prodajo proizvajalcev EU.
In addition, their prices are in line with those of the EU sales and the other imports.
Poleg tega so njihove cene v skladu s cenami prodaje EU in drugega uvoza.
Further, according to the data presented, in terms of market shares the measures have been more beneficial to third country producers than the Union industry.
V skladu s predstavljenimi podatki so bili glede na tržne deleže ukrepi koristnejši za proizvajalce tretjih držav kot za industrijo Unije.
The market shares of both Taiwan and Thailand are close to zero.
Tržna deleža Tajvana in Tajske sta blizu ničle.
Given that the volumes are so small, the reliability of claims about dumping are likely to be subject to a large margin of error.
Glede na to, da so količine tako majhne, je zanesljivost trditev glede dampinga verjetno manjša.
Where there are imports, import prices have been rising strongly.
Kjer je uvoz, cene uvoza močno rastejo.
Indian prices increased 29 %, Taiwan prices increased 27 % and Thailand prices increased 32 % over the period considered.
V preučevanem obdobju so se indijske cene zvišale za 29 %, tajvanske za 27 %, tajske pa za 32 %.
In addition, in all three cases, no price undercutting was found.
Poleg tega v nobenem od treh primerov ni bilo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
The Council’s assessment is that it is therefore not possible to justify a conclusion that these imports are causing injury.
Svet ocenjuje, da zato ni mogoče upravičiti ugotovitve, da ta uvoz povzroča škodo.
The Council’s assessment is also that it has not been demonstrated that injurious dumping by imports from the countries concerned would be likely to recur once the measures lapsed.
Ocenjuje tudi, da ni bilo dokazov, da bi se ob izteku ukrepov verjetno ponovno pojavil škodljivi damping zaradi uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
Although there is some overcapacity in the countries concerned, the Council is not persuaded that those unused capacities would be directed to the EU.
Čeprav v zadevnih državah obstaja nekaj presežnih zmogljivosti, Svet ni prepričan, da se bodo te neizkoriščene zmogljivosti usmerile v EU.
Demand is growing in most of the major markets.
Na večini večjih trgov povpraševanje narašča.
The price level in the EU compared with other countries is higher than in other major markets because these long-lasting measures are in force.
Raven cen v EU je v primerjavi z drugimi državami višja kot na drugih večjih trgih, ker veljajo ti dolgotrajni ukrepi.
Without the measures prices would tend to normalise vis-à-vis other countries.
Brez teh ukrepov bi se cene v primerjavi z drugimi državami normalizirale.
Therefore the Council believes that although there could be an increase of imports after the lapse of the measures, this increase would not be significant.
Zato Svet meni, da bi po izteku ukrepov sicer lahko prišlo do povečanja uvoza, vendar slednje ne bi bilo veliko.
The Council’s assessment is that no persuasive evidence has been provided on a number of factors which seem relevant to any assessment of whether removal of duties would lead to a resumption of injurious dumping.
Svet ocenjuje, da ni bilo predstavljenih nobenih prepričljivih dokazov za več dejavnikov, ki se zdijo bistveni za oceno, ali bi odprava dajatev povzročila ponovitev škodljivega dampinga.
Demand trends in third countries: in the case of Taiwan, for example, third country exports account for about 60 % of production capacity.
trendi povpraševanja v tretjih državah: na Tajvanu na primer izvoz v tretje države dosega okrog 60 % proizvodne zmogljivosti.
This suggests that future demand trends in these countries are relevant to the assessment.
To pomeni, da so za oceno pomembni prihodnji trendi povpraševanja v teh državah;
Transport costs and other factors affecting profitability: if third country export markets are closer to the exporter than the EU market — East Asia is a significant market — this will affect transport costs and hence profitability of export sales and hence the relative attractiveness of the EU market.
stroški prevoza in drugi dejavniki, ki vplivajo na dobičkonosnost: če so za izvoznika izvozni trgi tretjih držav bližji kot trg EU, pri čemer je Vzhodna Azija znaten trg, bo to vplivalo na stroške prevoza in s tem na dobičkonosnost izvoza ter relativno privlačnost trga EU.
Other factors point to the likelihood that removal of measures will not lead to a resumption of dumping which causes material injury to the Union Industry.
Drugi dejavniki kažejo na verjetnost, da odprava ukrepov ne bo povzročila ponovitve dampinga, ki povzroča materialno škodo industriji Unije.
Continued anti-subsidy measures against India and anti-dumping measures against China and other countries will continue to provide some protection for the Union Industry.
Nadaljnji protisubvencijski ukrepi proti Indiji ter protidampinški ukrepi proti Kitajski in drugim državam bodo še naprej zagotavljali nekaj zaščite za industrijo Unije.
The past pattern of trade in this market also suggests that any rise in exports from India, Thailand and Taiwan could partly or wholly displace third country imports rather than EU production.
Pretekla struktura trgovanja na tem trgu nakazuje tudi, da bi lahko vsako povečanje izvoza iz Indije, Tajske in Tajvana deloma ali v celoti nadomestilo uvoz iz tretjih držav, ne pa proizvodnjo EU.
The Council’s assessment is that material injury is unlikely to recur if the measures are allowed to lapse.
Svet ocenjuje, da se v primeru izteka ukrepov materialna škoda verjetno ne bo ponovila.
Therefore the Council finds that the criteria for continuing the measures according to Article 11(2) of the Basic Regulation are not met.
Zato meni, da merila za nadaljevanje ukrepov na podlagi člena 11(2) osnovne uredbe niso izpolnjena.
Article 21(1) of the Basic Regulation provides that a determination as to whether the Union interest calls for intervention is to be based on an appreciation of all the various interests taken as a whole.
V členu 21(1) osnovne uredbe je določeno, da odločitev o tem, ali interes Unije zahteva posredovanje, temelji na ocenitvi vseh različnih interesov kot celote.
PET prices are determined by a number of factors, but it is clear the anti-dumping measures have increased the costs to the user industry.
Cene PET se določijo glede na več dejavnikov, jasno pa je, da so zaradi protidampinških ukrepov povečani stroški uporabniške industrije.
Many users are bottlers and SMEs operating on tight margins and they have been seriously affected by high PET prices in recent years because PET represents a decisive proportion of their production costs.
Veliko uporabnikov so polnilnice ter MSP, ki poslujejo s skromnimi dobički, tako da so nanje močno vplivale visoke cene PET v zadnjih letih, saj PET pomeni bistven delež njihovih proizvodnih stroškov.
The impact of the high costs has been biggest on smaller bottling companies who have not been able to pass the increased prices on to retailers and final consumers due to low negotiating power.
Vpliv visokih stroškov je bil največji pri malih polnilnicah, ki zaradi majhne pogajalske moči povišanih cen niso zmogle prenesti na prodajalce na drobno in končne uporabnike.
Many are heavily loss-making and have lost a significant number of employees.
Številne imajo velike izgube in so izgubile znatno število zaposlenih.
The proposal recognises the deteriorating situation of users and the fact that EU PET prices are higher than in other major markets.
V predlogu so prepoznane vse slabše razmere uporabnikov in dejstvo, da so cene PET v EU višje kot na drugih večjih trgih.
However, in the Council’s opinion, it has not been demonstrated that the measures in question are not a contributing factor to the relatively high Union PET prices.
Vendar Svet meni, da ni bilo dokazano, da zadevni ukrepi niso eden od dejavnikov za sorazmerno visoke cene PET v Uniji.
The EU PET industry is now highly concentrated and increasingly vertically integrated.
Industrija PET v EU je danes zelo koncentrirana in vedno bolj vertikalno integrirana.
It is profitable and should be able to be internationally competitive.
Je dobičkonosna in bi morala biti mednarodno konkurenčna.