natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The authorities of the USA accepted the invitation and consultations were subsequently held on 17 November 2011.
Organi ZDA so sprejeli povabilo na posvetovanje, ki je bilo izvedeno 17. novembra 2011.
An information document containing the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided not to impose provisional countervailing measures (information document) was disclosed to interested parties in August 2012.
Zainteresiranim stranem je bilo avgusta 2012 poslano obvestilo o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bilo sklenjeno, da začasni izravnalni ukrepi ne bodo uvedeni.
Several interested parties made written submissions making their views known on these findings.
Več zainteresiranih strani je predložilo pisna stališča o teh ugotovitvah.
The parties who so requested were granted the opportunity to be heard.
Zaslišanje je bilo odobreno vsem stranem, ki so to zahtevale.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account, where appropriate.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile proučene in po potrebi ustrezno upoštevane.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the termination of both the anti-subsidy investigation concerning imports of bioethanol originating in the USA and the registration of such imports [4].
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti zaključek protisubvencijske preiskave o uvozu bioetanola s poreklom iz ZDA in registraciji takšnega uvoza [4].
The parties were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this final disclosure.
Določeno je bilo tudi obdobje, v katerem so lahko strani predložile svoja stališča v zvezi s tem dokončnim razkritjem.
Sampling of exporters/producers in the USA
Vzorčenje izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v ZDA
In view of the potentially large number of exporters/producers in the USA, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Ker lahko postopek vključuje veliko izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v ZDA, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and if so, to select a sample, exporters/producers in the USA were asked to make themselves known to the Commission within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to bioethanol during the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011 ('the investigation period' or 'the IP').
Da bi se lahko Komisija odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse izvoznike/proizvajalce v ZDA pozvala, da se ji javijo v 15 dneh od začetka preiskave in v skladu z obvestilom o začetku predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z bioetanolom, v obdobju od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The relevant US authorities were also consulted for the selection of a representative sample.
Komisija se je glede izbire reprezentativnega vzorca posvetovala tudi z ustreznimi organi ZDA.
More than 60 companies made themselves known and provided the requested information within the 15 days deadline.
Javilo se je več kot 60 družb, ki so v 15-dnevnem roku predložile zahtevane informacije.
In accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation, The Commission selected a sample based on the largest representative quantity of exports of bioethanol to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec na podlagi največje reprezentativne količine izvoza bioetanola v Unijo, ki ga je mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
The sample selected on that basis consisted of five bioethanol producers and one trader.
Vzorec, ki je bil izbran na tej podlagi, je vključeval pet proizvajalcev bioetanola in enega trgovca.
The investigation also showed that although exporters mentioned exports to the Union in the sampling questionnaire they received, none of the sampled producers exported bioethanol directly to the Union market but sold it to unrelated blenders/traders in the USA which then blended it with gasoline and resold it.
Preiskava je pokazala tudi, da čeprav so izvozniki v prejetem vprašalniku za vzorčenje navedli izvoz v Unijo, noben od njih ni neposredno izvažal bioetanola na trg Unije, ampak so ga prodajali nepovezanim pripravljavcem mešanic/trgovcem v ZDA, ki so bioetanol nato mešali z bencinom in ga preprodajali.
In order to identify their exports to the Union, the producers relied mainly on data they received from the unrelated blenders/traders customers.
Proizvajalci so svoj izvoz v Unijo opredelili predvsem na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih prejeli od nepovezanih pripravljavcev mešanic/trgovcev/strank.
In this context, it should be noted that the information provided by the US authorities demonstrated that all bioethanol sold in and exported from the United States benefitted from the main subsidy scheme, in particular when it was blended with gasoline.
V tem okviru bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je bilo na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili organi ZDA, dokazano, da je bila celotna količina bioetanola, ki je bila v Združenih državah Amerike prodana in iz njih izvožena, upravičena do glavne subvencijske sheme, zlasti mešanica bioetanola z bencinom.
It was the blending activity and the sale of the taxable mixture that triggered the subsidization of bioethanol in the US.
Subvencioniranje bioetanola v ZDA je bilo uvedeno predvsem zaradi mešanja in prodaje obdavčljive mešanice.
In the present case it was found that the main subsidy identified in the US was claimed by and granted to the blenders.
V zadevnem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da so pripravljavci mešanic zaprosili za glavno subvencijo, opredeljeno v ZDA, pri čemer jim je bila ta subvencija odobrena.
The companies selected in the sample were mainly producers of bioethanol and only to a smaller extent were blending bioethanol and it was predominantly the traders/blenders that also exported their products to the Union that received the main subsidy based on the bioethanol contained in the blends they were producing.
V vzorec so bili izbrani predvsem proizvajalci bioetanola in v manjšem obsegu tudi pripravljavci mešanic, pri čemer so glavno subvencijo na podlagi bioetanola v mešanicah, ki jih te družbe pripravljajo, prejeli predvsem trgovci/pripravljavci mešanic, ki so svoje izdelke izvažali tudi v Unijo.
Consequently, the sample, which is mainly composed of producers of bioethanol which did not export directly to the Union and which did basically not blend bioethanol into fuel mixtures, was not reliable for establishing the level of subsidisation in the present case.
Zato vzorec, v katerega so vključeni zlasti proizvajalci bioetanola, ki niso neposredno izvažali v Unijo in ki običajno niso dodajali bioetanola mešanicam goriva, ni zanesljiv za ugotavljanje ravni subvencioniranja v tem primeru.
In view of the potentially large number of Union producers, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Ker lahko postopek vključuje veliko proizvajalcev Unije, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
In the notice of initiation the Commission announced that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku sporočila, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
This sample consisted of five companies and groups, out of the 19 Union producers that were known prior to the initiation of the investigation.
Vzorec je bil sestavljen iz petih družb in skupin, izbranih izmed 19 proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili znani pred začetkom preiskave.
The sample was selected on the basis of the production volume of bioethanol during the investigation period and the location of the known producers.
Vzorec je bil izbran na podlagi obsega proizvodnje bioetanola v obdobju preiskave in lokacije znanih proizvajalcev.
This sample represented 48 % of the total estimated Union production during the IP.
Predstavljal je 48 % celotne ocenjene proizvodnje Unije v OP.
However, the investigation revealed that the groups included in the sample consisted of a large number of companies or single entities producing the like product.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da so bile skupine, vključene v vzorec, sestavljene iz velikega števila družb ali posameznih subjektov, ki proizvajajo podobni izdelek.
In this case it would have meant to investigate thirteen companies.
V tem primeru bi to pomenilo, da bi bilo treba preiskati trinajst družb.
It was thus not possible to investigate all of them given the time available for the investigation.
V času, ki je bil na voljo za preiskavo, torej ni bilo mogoče preiskati vseh družb.
It was decided to re-examine the data available for the initial sample.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da se ponovno proučijo podatki, ki so na voljo za začetni vzorec.
This examination led to the conclusion that the sample should be based on the largest individual producing entities and not on groups of producers taking also into account a certain geographical spread amongst sampled producers.
Pri tej preiskavi je bilo sklenjeno, da bi moral vzorec temeljiti na največjih posameznih proizvodnih subjektih, ne na skupinah proizvajalcev, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi določeno geografsko porazdelitev vzorčenih proizvajalcev.
Hence, a definitive sample of six individual producers was ultimately selected based on representativity in terms of the production and sales volume of bioethanol during the IP and the geographical location of the producer.
Zato je bil nazadnje na podlagi reprezentativnosti v smislu obsega proizvodnje in prodaje bioetanola v OP ter geografske lokacije proizvajalca izbran dokončen vzorec šestih posameznih proizvajalcev.
These producers represent 36 % of the total estimated Union production and 44 % of the total production reported by the companies that submitted data for the selection of a sample.
Ti proizvajalci predstavljajo 36 % celotne ocenjene proizvodnje Unije in 44 % celotne proizvodnje, ki so jo sporočile družbe, ki so predložile podatke za izbiro vzorca.
This sample was deemed to be representative for the Union industry.
Štelo se je, da je ta vzorec reprezentativen za industrijo Unije.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to comment on the appropriateness of the choice of the sample.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost predložiti pripombe o ustreznosti izbranega vzorca.
Some parties claimed that the sample was less representative than the one originally selected which included groups of companies.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je bil ta vzorec manj reprezentativen od prvotno izbranega vzorca, v katerega so bile vključene skupine družb.
In their view, an objective analysis of the situation of the Union industry could only be made by including all companies which are part of groups in the sample.
Po njihovem mnenju bi bilo objektivno analizo položaja industrije Unije mogoče izvesti samo, če bi bile vanjo vključene vse družbe, vključene v skupine v vzorcu.
They alleged in particular that costs and revenues could be allocated to certain companies of a group which are not visited and may thus not be included in the injury analysis.
Trdile so predvsem, da bi bilo mogoče stroške in prihodke prenesti na nekatere družbe iz skupine, ki ne bodo obiskane in zato ne morejo biti vključene v analizo škode.
In this respect it should be noted that the Commission duly considered and examined the data provided by all non-sampled companies and in particular the companies belonging to groups, in order to make sure that all costs and revenues involved in the production and sale by the companies selected had been fully and correctly reflected in the injury analysis.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba poudariti, da je Komisija ustrezno obravnavala in proučila podatke, ki so jih predložile vse nevzorčene družbe, zlasti družbe, ki so vključene v skupine, da bi preverila, ali so bili vsi stroški in prihodki, povezani s proizvodnjo in prodajo izbranih družb, celovito in pravilno upoštevani pri analizi škode.
Furthermore, the six companies finally selected producers represented 36 % of the total estimated Union production and this was considered to be representative for the purposes of Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je šest družb, ki so bile nazadnje izbrane kot proizvajalke, predstavljalo 36 % celotne ocenjene proizvodnje Unije, kar se je obravnavalo kot reprezentativno za namene člena 27 osnovne uredbe.
Some parties contested the inclusion in the sample of Union producers which were in a start-up phase.
Nekatere strani so nasprotovale vključitvi proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili v zagonski fazi, v vzorec.
They also claimed that one company with important idle capacity in 2011, located in a Member State that did not implement the Renewable Energies Directive ('RED'), should not have been included in the sample.
Trdile so tudi, da družba, ki leta 2011 ni izkoristila velikega dela svojih zmogljivosti in ima sedež v državi članici, v kateri se direktiva o obnovljivih virih energije ni izvajala, ne bi smela biti vključena v vzorec.
Parties added that in case these companies would be finally included in the sample, the Commission should adjust their data in order to account for these extraordinary circumstances.
Zadevne strani so dodale, da bi morala Komisija v primeru vključitve teh družb v vzorec prilagoditi njihove podatke, da bi se upoštevale te izredne okoliščine.
It is considered that the fact that companies recently started or resumed operations does not preclude them from being part of the sample.
Šteje se, da družbe zaradi dejstva, da so nedavno začele obratovati ali da so ponovno začele obratovati, ne bi smele biti izključene iz vzorca.
The inclusion of these companies is not in contravention with the criteria for the selection of a sample as laid down in Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Vključitev teh družb ni v nasprotju z merili za izbiro vzorca iz člena 27 osnovne uredbe.
With regard to the adjustment of their data, parties did not provide any specific issue or substantiated evidence to support their claim, nor a basis on how to make the claimed adjustment.
Kar zadeva prilagoditev podatkov, strani niso navedle posebnih težav ali predložile dokazil za utemeljitev svojih trditev, poleg tega pa niso navedle osnovnih podatkov o načinu izvedbe zahtevane prilagoditve.
Furthermore, the investigation did not reveal any cost, such as for example accelerated depreciations, which should be adjusted to correct any distortion due to the start-up of activity.
Poleg tega na podlagi preiskave niso bili ugotovljeni nobeni stroški, na primer pospešene amortizacije, ki bi jih bilo treba prilagoditi, da bi se odpravila morebitna izkrivljanja zaradi zagona dejavnosti.
Hence, this claim is rejected.
Ta zahtevek se zato zavrne.
Some parties also disputed the exclusion from the sample of one company that was provisionally selected and located in a Member State with high consumption and production of bioethanol.
Nekatere strani so nasprotovale izključitvi družbe, ki je bila začasno izbrana in je imela sedež v državi članici z visoko porabo in proizvodnjo bioetanola, iz vzorca.
They claimed that this company performed particularly well and alleged that this was the reason for its exclusion from the sample.
Trdile so, da je ta družba zelo uspešna in da je bil to razlog za njeno izključitev iz vzorca.
They further argued that the selection of the sample had been skewed towards finding injury.
Poleg tega so trdile, da je bila izbira vzorca izkrivljena tako, da bi se ugotovila škoda.
According to these parties the Commission should have sent so called mini-questionnaires to all producers to collect the relevant data in order to select a sample.
Po mnenju teh strani bi morala Komisija vsem proizvajalcem poslati kratke vprašalnike, na podlagi katerih bi zbrala ustrezne podatke za izbiro vzorca.
In this respect it should be noted that the company in question informed the Commission that it could no longer be included in the sample.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba poudariti, da je zadevna družba obvestila Komisijo, da ne more biti več vključena v vzorec.
Regarding the sending of mini-questionnaires, it should be noted that, prior to the selection of the sample, the Commission requested information from all Union producers known to be concerned in order to collect the relevant data for the purpose of the selection of a sample.
V zvezi s pošiljanjem kratkih vprašalnikov bi bilo treba poudariti, da je Komisija pred izbiro vzorca od vseh proizvajalcev Unije, za katere je bilo znano, da jih to zadeva, zahtevala informacije, da bi zbrala ustrezne podatke za izbiro vzorca.
The above claims were therefore rejected.
Ta zahtevek je bil zato zavrnjen.
Finally, it was claimed that the sample should have included companies producing bioethanol from sugar beet since production from this raw material can be much more profitable than production from, for example, wheat.
Nazadnje so strani trdile, da bi bilo treba v vzorec vključiti družbe, ki proizvajajo bioetanol iz sladkorne pese, ker je lahko proizvodnja iz te surovine bistveno donosnejša na primer od proizvodnje iz pšenice.
Even though this claim was not substantiated, the information available has shown that bioethanol produced from sugar beet represents only a small part of total Union production, around 12 % in 2011 and that two of the companies included in the sample partially use sugar beet as feedstock to produce bioethanol.
Čeprav ta trditev ni bila utemeljena, je bilo na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ugotovljeno, da bioetanol, proizveden iz sladkorne pese, predstavlja samo majhen del celotne proizvodnje Unije, in sicer približno 12 % leta 2011, in da dve družbi, vključeni v vzorec, sladkorno peso delno uporabljata kot surovino za proizvodnjo bioetanola.
Therefore, this claim was rejected.
Zato je bil ta zahtevek zavrnjen.
In view of the potentially large number of importers involved in the proceeding, sampling was envisaged for importers in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Ker lahko postopek vključuje veliko uvoznikov, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku za uvoznike predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
Only three importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample within the deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Samo trije uvozniki so v roku iz obvestila o začetku predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
In view of the limited number of cooperating importers, sampling was not deemed to be necessary.
Glede na omejeno število sodelujočih uvoznikov se je štelo, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem stranem, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva.
Questionnaires were thus sent to the authorities of the USA, the sampled US exporters/producers, the sampled Union producers, the three cooperating unrelated importers in the Union and to all users known to be concerned by the investigation.
Vprašalniki so bili torej poslani organom ZDA, vzorčenim izvoznikom/proizvajalcem ZDA, vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, trem sodelujočim nepovezanim uvoznikom v Uniji in vsem uporabnikom, za katere je znano, da jih preiskava zadeva.
Replies were received from the authorities of the USA, the sampled US exporters/producers, the sampled Union producers, two unrelated importers and four users.
Odgovore so poslali organi ZDA, vzorčeni izvozniki/proizvajalci ZDA, vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, dva nepovezana uvoznika in štirje uporabniki.
The Commission sought and verified all the information provided by interested parties and deemed necessary for the purposes of a determination of subsidisation, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani in ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev subvencioniranja, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Verification visits were carried out at the following US authorities:
Preveritveni obiski so bili izvedeni v prostorih naslednjih organov ZDA:
Federal authorities of the USA
Zvezni organi ZDA
Departament of Agriculture
Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo
Departament of Commerce
Ministrstvo za trgovino
Department of Energy
Ministrstvo za energijo
Department of the Treasury
Ministrstvo za finance
International Trade Administration
Ministrstvo za mednarodno trgovino
Office of the United States Trade Representative
Urad trgovinskega predstavnika Združenih držav Amerike
Verification visits were also carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski so bili izvedeni tudi v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Exporters/producers in the USA
Izvozniki/proizvajalci v ZDA
Producers in the Union
Proizvajalci v Uniji
Abengoa Energy Netherlands B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Abengoa Energy Netherlands B.V., Rotterdam, Nizozemska
BioWanze, S.A., Wanze, Belgium.
BioWanze, S.A., Wanze, Belgija
Crop Energies Bioethanol GmbH, Mannheim, Germany
Crop Energies Bioethanol GmbH, Mannheim, Nemčija
Ensus, Yarm, United Kingdom
Ensus, Yarm, Združeno kraljestvo
Lantmännen Energi / Agroetanol, Norrkoping, Sweden
Lantmännen Energi / Agroetanol, Norrkoping, Švedska
Tereos BENP, Lillebonne, France
Tereos BENP, Lillebonne, Francija
Unrelated importers in the Union
Nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji
Shell Trading Rotterdam B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Shell Trading Rotterdam B.V., Rotterdam, Nizozemska
Greenergy Fuels Limited, London, United Kingdom
Greenergy Fuels Limited, London, Združeno kraljestvo
Users in the Union
Uporabniki v Uniji
Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Shell Nederland Verkoopmaatschappij B.V., Rotterdam, Nizozemska
The product concerned is bioethanol, sometimes referred to as ‘fuel ethanol’, i.e. ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products, denatured or undenatured, excluding products with a water content of more than 0,3 % (m/m) measured according to the standard EN 15376, as well as ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products contained in blends with gasoline with an ethyl alcohol content of more than 10 % (v/v) originating in the USA, currently falling within CN codes ex22071000, ex22072000, ex22089099, ex27101211, ex27101215, ex27101221, ex27101225, ex27101231, ex27101241, ex27101245, ex27101249, ex27101251, ex27101259, ex27101270, ex27101290, ex38140010, ex38140090, ex38200000 and ex38249097.
Zadevni izdelek je bioetanol, včasih imenovan „etanol za gorivo“, tj. etilni alkohol, proizveden iz kmetijskih proizvodov, denaturiran ali nedenaturiran, brez proizvodov z vsebnostjo vode več kot 0,3 % (m/m), izmerjene v skladu s standardom EN 15376, kot tudi etilni alkohol, proizveden iz kmetijskih proizvodov, vsebovan v mešanicah z bencinom z vsebnostjo etilnega alkohola več kot 10 % (v/v), s poreklom iz ZDA, trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex22071000, ex22072000, ex22089099, ex27101211, ex27101215, ex27101221, ex27101225, ex27101231, ex27101241, ex27101245, ex27101249, ex27101251, ex27101259, ex27101270, ex27101290, ex38140010, ex38140090, ex38200000 in ex38249097.
Bioethanol can be produced from various agricultural feedstocks, such as sugar cane, sugar beet, potatoes, manioc, and corn.
Bioetanol je mogoče proizvajati iz različnih kmetijskih surovin, na primer iz sladkornega trsa, sladkorne pese, krompirja, manioke in koruze.
In the USA a distinction on the basis of the various feedstocks is made, as described below:
V ZDA se razlikuje glede na različne surovine, iz katerih je proizveden, kot je navedeno spodaj: