natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 17 April 2012, the Commission received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation (‘the request’) to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters originating in the PRC and to make imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (‘Vietnam’), whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not, subject to registration.
Komisija je 17. aprila 2012 prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zahtevek), da razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ter da uvede registracijo uvoza žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov z vžigom na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, odpremljenih iz Vietnama, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Socialistične republike Vietnam ali ne.
The request was lodged by Société BIC, a Union producer of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters.
Zahtevek je vložila družba Société BIC, proizvajalka žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, iz Unije.
The request contained sufficient prima facie evidence that the original measures were being circumvented by means of assembly operations in Vietnam.
Zahtevek je vseboval zadostne dokaze prima facie o izogibanju prvotnim ukrepom z aktivnostjo sestavljanja v Vietnamu.
The request showed that following the imposition of the original measures, a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC and Vietnam to the Union occurred, for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the original measures.
Zahtevek je pokazal, da se je po uvedbi prvotnih ukrepov znatno spremenil trgovinski vzorec, ki vključuje izvoz iz LRK in Vietnama v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe prvotnih ukrepov ni bilo zadostnega vzroka ali ta ni bila gospodarsko upravičena.
This change in the pattern of trade stemmed allegedly from the assembly operations of lighters in Vietnam using parts originating in the PRC.
Ta sprememba v trgovinskem vzorcu je domnevno posledica sestavljanja vžigalnikov v Vietnamu iz delov s poreklom iz LRK.
Furthermore, the prima facie evidence pointed to the fact that the remedial effects of the original measures were being undermined both in terms of quantity and price.
Poleg tega so dokazi prima facie pokazali, da je bil popravljalni učinek prvotnih ukrepov oslabljen v smislu količine in cene.
The evidence showed in particular that the increased imports from Vietnam were made at prices below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation.
Iz dokazov je zlasti razvidno, da se je povečani uvoz iz Vietnama odvijal po cenah, ki so nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
Finally, there was also sufficient prima facie evidence that prices of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters consigned from Vietnam were dumped in relation to the normal value established during the original investigation.
Poleg tega so bili na voljo tudi zadostni dokazi prima facie, da so bile cene žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov z vžigom na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, odpremljenih iz Vietnama, dampinške v primerjavi z normalno vrednostjo, določeno v prvotni preiskavi.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated an investigation by Commission Regulation (EU) No 548/2012 [9] (‘the initiating Regulation’).
Ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi prima facie za začetek preiskave na podlagi člena 13 osnovne uredbe, je začela preiskavo z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 548/2012 [9] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o začetku preiskave).
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, by the initiating Regulation, also directed the customs authorities to register imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not.
V skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe je Komisija z uredbo o začetku preiskave carinskim organom tudi naložila, da registrirajo uvoz žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, odpremljenih iz Vietnama, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Vietnama ali ne.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC and Vietnam, the exporting producers in those countries, the importers in the Union known to be concerned and Société BIC (the applicant), a Union producer representing more than 75 % of the production of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters in the European Union, of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila pristojne organe LRK in Vietnama, proizvajalce izvoznike v navedenih državah, uvoznike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in družbo Société BIC (vložnika), proizvajalca Unije, ki v Evropski uniji proizvede več kot 75 % žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti.
Questionnaires were sent to 70 exporting producers in the PRC and 15 exporting producers in Vietnam known to the Commission from the request.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani 70 proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK in 15 proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Vietnamu, ki so bili Komisiji znani iz zahtevka.
Questionnaires were also sent to 59 importers in the Union named in the request.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani tudi 59 uvoznikom v Uniji, navedenim v zahtevku.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost v roku iz uredbe o začetku preiskave pisno izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje.
All parties were informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and to findings being based on the facts available.
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene, da se lahko zaradi nesodelovanja uporabi člen 18 osnovne uredbe in posledično ugotovitve na podlagi dostopnih dejstev.
Eight out of the 15 known exporting producers in Vietnam came forward, one of which claimed that it did not want to be considered as an interested party as it did not produce the product under investigation and did not export to the Union.
Javilo se je osem od 15 znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Vietnamu, od katerih je eden trdil, da ne želi šteti za zainteresirano stran, saj ni proizvajal izdelka v preiskavi in ni izvažal v Unijo.
The following seven companies submitted replies to the questionnaires and verification visits were subsequently carried out at their premises:
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je predložilo sedem spodaj naštetih družb, nato pa so bili v njihovih prostorih opravljeni preveritveni obiski:
Viet Giai Thanh Co. Ltd, Ho Chi Minh City,
Viet Giai Thanh Co. Ltd, mesto Ho Chi Minh,
Hoa Hung Co. Ltd, Tay Ninh Province,
Hoa Hung Co. Ltd, provinca Tay Ninh,
Trung Lai Gas Lighter Manufacture Co. Ltd, Nghe An Province,
Trung Lai Gas Lighter Manufacture Co. Ltd, provinca Nghe An,
Textion Plastic Co. Ltd, Binh Duong Province,
Textion Plastic Co. Ltd, provinca Binh Duong,
Cherry Year Vietnam Lighter Manufacture Co. Ltd, Tay Ninh Province,
Cherry Year Vietnam Lighter Manufacture Co. Ltd, provinca Tay Ninh,
Huaxing Vietnam Manufacture Co. Ltd, Tay Ninh Province,
Huaxing Vietnam Manufacture Co. Ltd, provinca Tay Ninh,
Top Field Enterprises Co. Ltd, Tay Ninh Province.
Top Field Enterprises Co. Ltd, provinca Tay Ninh.
None of the known exporting producers in the PRC came forward or submitted a questionnaire reply.
Nobeden od znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK se ni javil ali predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
As regards importers, eight submitted a questionnaire reply, whereas six companies came forward and claimed that they did not want to be considered as interested parties as they did not import gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters from Vietnam (the product under investigation) in the Union.
Med uvozniki jih je osem predložilo odgovore na vprašalnik, šest družb pa se je javilo in trdilo, da ne želijo šteti za zainteresirane strani, saj v Unijo niso uvažale žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, iz Vietnama (izdelka v preiskavi).
The remaining known companies did not come forward at all.
Preostale znane družbe se sploh niso javile.
Their observations questioned the grounds of the initiation of the investigation as regards the product scope, import volumes, economic justification for the changes in the pattern of trade, the motivations behind the request and the financial situation of the Union prducer having made the request.
V njih sta izrazila dvom o razlogih za začetek preiskave glede obsega izdelka, obsega uvoza, gospodarske upravičenosti sprememb v trgovinskem vzorcu, motivacije za zahtevek in glede finančnega položaja proizvajalca Unije, ki je vložil zahtevek.
In the opinion of the two importers, there were insufficient grounds to initiate an investigation.
Po mnenju dveh uvoznikov ni bilo zadostnih razlogov za začetek preiskave.
The Commission provided a detailed reply to the observations and gave the parties an opportunity to comment.
Komisija je zagotovila podrobne odgovore na izražene pomisleke in je vsem stranem dala možnost, da predložijo pripombe.
The Commission outlined why it considered that the request contained sufficient prima facie evidence to justify the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je navedla, zakaj so bilo po njenem mnenju v zahtevku zadostni dokazi prima facie, da je bil začetek preiskave upravičen.
The comments made by the two importers did not demonstrate that there would not have been sufficient prima facie evidence to justify the initiation of the investigation.
Pripombe dveh uvoznikov niso dokazale, da ni bilo dovolj dokazov prima facie, da se upraviči začetek preiskave.
More detailed data were collected for the reporting period from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012 (‘the RP’) in order to examine the possible undermining of the remedial effect of the measures and the existence of dumping.
Za obdobje od 1. aprila 2011 do 31. marca 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje poročanja) so bili zbrani podrobnejši podatki, da bi se preverila morebitna oslabitev popravljalnega učinka ukrepov in obstoj dampinga.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was made by analysing successively whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, Vietnam and the Union;
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe se je obstoj izogibanja ukrepom ocenjeval z zaporedno analizo, v kateri se je ugotavljalo, ali je prišlo do spremembe v trgovinskem vzorcu med LRK, Vietnamom in Unijo;
if this change resulted from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty;
ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dejavnosti, za katero razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko upravičena;
if there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the product under investigation;
ali so obstajali dokazi o škodi ali o tem, da so popravljalne učinke dajatve oslabile cene in/ali količine izdelka v preiskavi;
and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established in the original investigation, if necessary in accordance with Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
in ali so obstajali dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, predhodno ugotovljenimi v prvotni preiskavi, po potrebi v skladu s členom 2 osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned is as defined in the original investigation:
Zadevni izdelek je opredeljen v prvotni preiskavi:
gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters currently falling within CN code ex96131000 and originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the product concerned’).
žepni plinski vžigalniki na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznako KN ex96131000, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek).
The product under investigation is the same as that defined in the previous recital, but consigned from Vietnam, whether declared as originating in Vietnam or not, currently falling within the same CN code as the product concerned (‘the product under investigation’).
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak kot tisti, ki je opredeljen v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, le da je odpremljen iz Vietnama, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Vietnama ali ne, ki se trenutno uvršča pod isto oznako KN kot zadevni izdelek (izdelek v preiskavi).
The investigation showed that gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters, as defined above, exported from the PRC to the Union and those consigned from Vietnam to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo žepni plinski vžigalniki na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, kakor so opredeljeni zgoraj, izvoženi v Unijo iz LRK, in tisti, odpremljeni v Unijo iz Vietnama, enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti ter enako uporabo, zato se jih šteje za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As stated in recital 18, seven companies submitted questionnaire replies.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 18, je sedem družb predložilo izpolnjene vprašalnike.
For the RP, the total volume of lighters reported as sold to the Union according to these replies represented more than 100 % of the total volume of lighters reported as imported into the Union according to the Eurostat Comext database.
V obdobju poročanja je glede na predložene vprašalnike celotna količina vžigalnikov, prodanih v Unijo, presegala 100 % celotne količine vžigalnikov, uvoženih v Unijo po podatkih Eurostatove podatkovne zbirke Comext.
Despite the fact that the information regarding sales volumes in the replies was considered to be unreliable as explained in recital 29 below, it is considered that this still gives an indication that cooperation was high and that the companies investigated are representative.
Kljub dejstvu, da so se podatki o obsegih prodaje v odgovorih šteli za nezanesljive, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi 29 spodaj, se šteje, da kljub temu kažejo, da je bila raven sodelovanja visoka in so preiskovane družbe reprezentativne.
During the verification visits carried-out at the premises of the seven Vietnamese exporting producers, it was found that they had each submitted information which could not be considered to be reliable for the purpose of establishing the findings relevant to the investigation.
Med obiski zaradi preveritve, opravljenimi v prostorih sedmih vietnamskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so vsi predložili informacije, ki jih ni mogoče šteti za zanesljive za oblikovanje ugotovitev, pomembnih za preiskavo.
In particular, the seven companies were found to have wrongly stated their production volumes, imports of lighter parts and total sales.
Ugotovljeno je bilo zlasti, da je vseh sedem družb nepravilno navedlo obseg svoje proizvodnje, uvoz delov vžigalnikov in obseg celotne prodaje.
It was also found that part of the business relating to the product under investigation was not included in the official acounts and that certain assembly operations were carried out by unofficial subcontractors.
Prav tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da del poslovanja, ki zadeva izdelek v preiskavi, ni bil vključen v uradnih evidencah, in da so nekatere aktivnosti sestavljanja opravljali neuradni podizvajalci.
Moreover, quantities of imports of parts from the PRC were not declared or wrongly stated, and part of the sales were not accounted for in the accounts of the companies.
Poleg tega obseg uvoza delov iz LRK ni bil prijavljen ali je bil prijavljen napačno in del prodaje ni bil upoštevan v poslovnih knjigah družb.
As a result, it has not been possible to reliably establish, in particular, the total production and total sales volumes of the companies concerned, or to reconcile the actual sale prices of the product under investigation and the costs relating to key input materials such as gas with the data provided in the replies to the questionnaire.
Zato zlasti ni bilo mogoče zanesljivo določiti celotnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje zadevnih družb ter uskladiti dejanskih prodajnih cen izdelka v preiskavi in stroškov, ki zadevajo ključne surovine, kot je plin, s podatki, navedenimi v predloženih vprašalnikih.
In view of the situation described in recital 29, the exporting producers were informed that pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation it was envisaged to base the findings and conclusions of the investigation on the best facts available.
Glede na položaj, opisan v uvodni izjavi 29, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki obveščeni, da je bilo v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe predvideno, da se ugotovitve in sklepi preiskave utemeljijo na podlagi najboljših dostopnih dejstev.
Parties were given an opportunity to comment and were granted a hearing when requested.
Stranem je bila dana možnost, da predložijo pripombe, in jim je bilo na zahtevo odobreno zaslišanje.
Each party received an individual letter outlining the specific and detailed findings which led to the conclusion that the data provided could not be considered to be reliable and was not suitable to establish the facts necessary for the investigation.
Vsaka stran je prejela ločen dopis, v katerem so bile orisane posebne in podrobne ugotovitve, na podlagi katerih je bilo sklenjeno, da se predloženi podatki ne morejo šteti za zanesljive in niso primerni za ugotavljanje dejstev, potrebnih za preiskavo.
Two exporting producers did not provide any comments on the intention to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika nista predložila pripomb o nameravani uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
They disputed the Commission’s intention to disregard the data they provided and the possible conclusion of the existence of circumvention based on the application of the best facts available.
Izpodbijali so namero Komisije, da ne upošteva predloženih podatkov, in morebitno ugotovitev izogibanja ukrepom, ki bi temeljila na uporabi najboljših dostopnih dejstev.
Four of the exporting producers did not contest the fact that the information they provided was not complete or reliable and admitted the discrepancies in their accounting and the fact that not all operations were disclosed or recorded in their books.
Štirje od proizvajalcev izvoznikov niso izpodbijali dejstva, da informacije, ki so jih predložili, niso bile popolne ali zanesljive, ter so priznali razlike v svojih poslovnih knjigah in dejstvo, da niso razkrili vseh svojih dejavnosti ali jih niso zavedli v svoje poslovne knjige.
However, they claimed that these differences only concerned their domestic sales and did not have any effect on their export sales.
Vendar pa so trdili, da so te razlike zadevale samo njihovo domačo prodajo in niso vplivale na njihovo izvozno prodajo.
One party claimed that its records had been destroyed by a fire, which explained the incompleteness of the information available.
Ena stran je trdila, da so bile njene evidence uničene v požaru, kar pojasnjuje nepopolne dostopne informacije.
They further claimed that the quantity of gas contained in the lighters was wrongly estimated by the Commission and that therefore the findings regarding the production volumes were not correct.
Poleg tega so trdili, da je Komisija napačno ocenila količino plina v vžigalnikih in da zato ugotovitve glede obsega proizvodnje niso bile pravilne.
One company claimed that a discrepancy concerning gas consumption was explained by intentional releases of gas during the warmer months.
Ena družba je trdila, da so bile razlike v porabi plina posledica namernih izpustov plina v toplejših mesecih.
These parties could not, however, provide any substantiated evidence to support these claims.
Vendar pa te strani niso predložile utemeljenih dokazov, ki bi podprli njihove trditve.
The companies also stated that they were fully cooperative and were not withholding any information concerning their business.
Družbe so tudi izjavile, da so v celoti sodelovale in da niso zadrževale nobenih informacij v zvezi s svojim poslovanjem.
They admitted to have provided deficient replies, but strongly contested having submitted false or misleading information.
Priznale so, da so predložile pomanjkljive odgovore, vendar so močno ugovarjale trditvi, da so predložile napačne in zavajajoče informacije.
In their view, undisclosed and unverifiable data does not, of itself, consitute a proof of circumvention and according to them, the Commission had not demonstrated, on the basis of on positive evidence, that circumvention was taking place.
Po njihovem mnenju nerazkriti in nepreverljivi podatki ne dokazujejo izogibanja ukrepom in Komisija po njihovem mnenju ni imela trdnih dokazov, da je prišlo do izogibanja.
Although the companies have not themselves provided complete and accurate records of their activities, the Commission has used alternative methods, such as the consumption of raw materials, to reconcile the key data provided in the questionnaire replies with the information provided and discovered on spot.
Čeprav družbe same niso predložile popolnih in točnih evidenc o svojih dejavnostih, je Komisija uporabila alternativne metode, kot je poraba surovin, da je ključne podatke iz predloženih vprašalnikov uskladila z informacijami, ki so bile predložene in razkrite na kraju samem.
Such alternative methods, even if inevitably less precise than actual records, showed that the data provided was not reliable.
Take alternativne metode so, čeprav so neizogibno manj natančne kot dejanske evidence, pokazale, da predloženi podatki niso bili zanesljivi.
For instance, the outcome concerning production volume showed that the production quantities declared by the companies did not match with their consumption of raw materials.
Rezultati glede obsega proizvodnje so na primer pokazali, da se obseg proizvodnje v družbah, ki so ga te prijavile, ni ujemal z njihovo potrošnjo surovin.
The Commission considers that the absence of reliable records, the withholding of information which is relevant to the investigation and the submission of false or misleading information rendered the data unreliable following a verification process.
Komisija po postopku preverjanja ugotavlja, da so zaradi odsotnosti zanesljivih evidenc, zadrževanja informacij, ki so pomembne za preiskavo, in predložitve napačnih ali zavajajočih informacij podatki nezanesljivi.
Given the above, findings in respect of imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters from Vietnam into the Union had to be made on the basis of the facts available in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bilo treba ugotovitve v zvezi z uvozom žepnih plinskih vžigalnikov na kresilni kamen, ki jih ni mogoče ponovno polniti, iz Vietnama v Unijo, oblikovati na podlagi dostopnih dejstev v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe.