natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Using the powers conferred by Article 124 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the President of the Office shall adopt the internal administrative instructions and shall publish the notices that are necessary for the fulfilment of all the tasks entrusted to the Office by this Regulation.
Na podlagi pooblastil iz člena 124 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 predsednik Urada sprejme notranja upravna navodila in objavlja obvestila, ki so potrebna za izpolnjevanje vseh nalog, za katere ta uredba pooblašča Urad.
Content of the work programme and of the management report
Vsebina delovnega programa in poročila o vodenju
The Office shall draw up an annual work programme that appropriately prioritises the activities under this Regulation and for the meetings of the Observatory, in line with the Union’s policies and priorities in the field of protection of intellectual property rights and in cooperation with the representatives referred to in point (a) of Article 4(5).
Urad sestavi letni delovni program, v katerem so ustrezno prednostno razporejene dejavnosti iz te uredbe in za srečanja Opazovalnega urada, v skladu s politikami in prednostnimi nalogami Unije na področju varstva pravic intelektualne lastnine ter v sodelovanju s predstavniki iz točke (a) člena 4(5).
The work programme referred to in paragraph 1 shall be submitted to the Office’s Administrative Board for information.
Delovni program iz odstavka 1 se predloži upravnemu odboru Urada v vednost.
The management report provided for in point (d) of Article 124(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 shall contain at least the following information concerning the Office’s tasks and activities under this Regulation:
Poročilo o vodenju iz točke (d) člena 124(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 vsebuje vsaj naslednje informacije v zvezi z nalogami in dejavnostmi Urada v skladu s to uredbo:
a review of the main activities carried out during the preceding calendar year;
pregled glavnih dejavnosti, izvedenih v predhodnem koledarskem letu;
the results achieved during the preceding calendar year, accompanied, where appropriate, by sectoral reports analysing the situation in the different industry and product sectors;
rezultate, dosežene v predhodnem koledarskem letu, ki se jim po potrebi priložijo sektorska poročila, v katerih je analizirano stanje v različnih industrijskih in proizvodnih sektorjih;
an overall assessment of the fulfilment of the Office’s tasks as provided for in this Regulation and in the work programme drawn up in accordance with paragraph 1;
splošno oceno izpolnjevanja nalog Urada iz te uredbe in delovni program, sestavljen v skladu z odstavkom 1;
an overview of the activities that the Office intends to undertake in the future;
pregled dejavnosti, ki jih Urad namerava izvajati v prihodnosti;
observations on the enforcement of intellectual property rights and potential future policies and strategies, including on how to enhance effective cooperation with and between Member States;
pripombe o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine in morebitnih prihodnjih politik in strategij, vključno s tem, kako okrepiti učinkovito sodelovanje z in med državami članicami;
an overall assessment of the proper representation in the Observatory of all the actors mentioned in Article 4(2).
splošno oceno ustrezne zastopanosti vseh akterjev iz člena 4(2) v Opazovalnem uradu.
Before submitting the management report to the European Parliament, the Commission and the Administrative Board, the President of the Office shall consult the representatives referred to in point (a) of Article 4(5) on the relevant parts of the report.
Preden predsednik Urada poročilo o vodenju predloži Evropskemu parlamentu, Komisiji in upravnemu odboru, se o relevantnih delih poročila posvetuje s predstavniki iz točke (a) člena 4(5).
The Commission shall adopt a report evaluating the application of this Regulation by 6 June 2017.
Komisija do 6. junij 2017 sprejme poročilo, v katerem oceni uporabo te uredbe.
The evaluation report shall assess the operation of this Regulation, in particular as regards its impact on the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the internal market.
V ocenjevalnem poročilu se oceni izvajanje te uredbe, zlasti glede njenega učinka na uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine na notranjem trgu.
The Commission shall, when preparing the evaluation report, consult the Office, the Member States and the representatives meeting as the Observatory on the issues referred to in paragraph 2.
Komisija se pri pripravi ocenjevalnega poročila o vprašanjih iz odstavka 2 posvetuje z Uradom, državami članicami in predstavniki, ki se srečujejo v okviru Opazovalnega urada.
The Commission shall transmit the evaluation report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee and shall undertake a broad consultation among stakeholders on the evaluation report.
Komisija ocenjevalno poročilo posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru ter o njem sproži široko posvetovanje med zainteresiranimi stranmi.
OJ C 376, 22.12.2011, p. 62.
UL C 376, 22.12.2011, str. 62.
Position of the European Parliament of 14 February 2012 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 22 March 2012 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. februarja 2012 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 22. marca 2012 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ C 253, 4.10.2008, p. 1.
UL C 253, 4.10.2008, str. 1.
OJ C 56, 6.3.2010, p. 1.
UL C 56, 6.3.2010, str. 1.
OJ C 140, 29.5.2010, p. 22.
UL C 140, 29.5.2010, str. 22.
Corrected version in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 16.
Popravljena različica v UL L 195, 2.6.2004, str. 16.
OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p. 206.
UL C 117 E, 6.5.2010, str. 206.
OJ C 50 E, 21.2.2012, p. 48.
UL C 50 E, 21.2.2012, str. 48.
Regulation (EU) No 387/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 387/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 on the European Fisheries Fund, as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo v zvezi z nekaterimi določbami, povezanimi s finančnim poslovodenjem za nekatere države članice, ki so jih prizadele ali jim grozijo resne težave v zvezi s finančno stabilnostjo
The unprecedented global financial crisis and the unprecedented economic downturn have seriously damaged economic growth and financial stability and have provoked a strong deterioration in financial and economic conditions in several Member States.
Globalna finančna kriza in gospodarski upad, kakršnih ne pomnimo, sta resno omajala gospodarsko rast in finančno stabilnost ter povzročila občutno poslabšanje finančnih in gospodarskih pogojev v številnih državah članicah.
In particular, certain Member States are experiencing or are threatened with serious difficulties, notably problems concerning their economic growth and financial stability and a deterioration in their deficit and debt position, due to the international economic and financial environment.
Zlasti nekatere države članice so prizadele ali pa jim grozijo resne težave, še posebej glede gospodarske rasti in finančne stabilnosti, ter težave zaradi povečanja javnofinančnega primanjkljaja in javnega dolga, čemur so med drugim botrovale gospodarske in finančne okoliščine na mednarodni ravni.
Whilst important actions to counterbalance the negative effects of the crisis have already been taken, including amendments to the legislative framework, the impact of the financial crisis on the real economy, the labour market and citizens is being widely felt.
Čeprav so bili že sprejeti pomembni ukrepi za uravnavanje negativnih učinkov krize, vključno s spremembami zakonodajnega okvira, je vpliv finančne krize na realno gospodarstvo, trg dela in državljane velik.
Pressure on national financial resources is increasing and further steps should be taken to alleviate that pressure through the maximal and optimal use of funding from the European Fisheries Fund.
Pritisk na nacionalne finančne vire je vedno večji, zaradi česar bi bilo treba sprejeti dodatne ukrepe za zmanjšanje tega pritiska s čim večjo in čim boljšo uporabo finančnih sredstev iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo.
Pursuant to Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which provides for the possibility of granting Union financial assistance to a Member State in difficulties or seriously threatened with severe difficulties caused inter alia by exceptional occurrences beyond its control, Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 [3] established a European financial stabilisation mechanism, with a view to preserving the financial stability of the Union.
Na podlagi člena 122(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki določa, da se lahko državi članici, ki je v težavah ali ji med drugim zaradi izjemnih okoliščin, nad katerimi nima nikakršnega nadzora, resno grozijo hude težave, odobri finančna pomoč Unije, je Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 407/2010 [3] vzpostavila Evropski mehanizem za finančno stabilizacijo z namenom ohranitve finančne stabilnosti Unije.
By Council Implementing Decisions 2011/77/EU [4] and 2011/344/EU [5] respectively, Ireland and Portugal were granted such Union financial assistance.
Z izvedbenima sklepoma Sveta 2011/77/EU [4] oziroma 2011/344/EU [5] je bila tovrstna finančna pomoč Unije odobrena Irski in Portugalski.
Greece was already experiencing serious difficulties with respect to its financial stability before the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 407/2010.
Grčijo so hude težave s finančno stabilnostjo prizadele že pred začetkom veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 407/2010.
Financial assistance to Greece could not, therefore, be based on that Regulation.
Zato navedena uredba ni mogla biti podlaga za finančno pomoč Grčiji.
Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States’ balances of payments [6] provides that the Council is to grant mutual assistance where a Member State which has not adopted the euro is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with difficulties as regards its balance of payments.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic [6] zagotavlja, da Svet odobri medsebojno pomoč, kadar ima država članica, ki ni sprejela eura, težave s plačilno bilanco ali obstaja resna nevarnost, da bi v tovrstne težave zašla.
By Council Decisions 2009/102/EC [7], 2009/290/EC [8] and 2009/459/EC [9] respectively, Hungary, Latvia and Romania were granted such Union financial assistance.
S sklepi Sveta 2009/102/ES [7], 2009/290/ES [8] oziroma 2009/459/ES [9] je bila tovrstna finančna pomoč Unije odobrena Madžarski, Latviji in Romuniji.
The period during which the financial assistance is available to Ireland, Hungary, Latvia, Portugal and Romania is set out in the relevant Council Decisions.
Obdobje, v katerem je finančna pomoč na voljo Irski, Madžarski, Latviji, Portugalski in Romuniji, je navedeno v ustreznih sklepih Sveta.
The period during which financial assistance was made available to Hungary expired on 4 November 2010.
Obdobje, v katerem je bila finančna pomoč dana na voljo Madžarski, se je izteklo 4. novembra 2010.
The period during which financial assistance under the Intercreditor Agreement and the Loan Facility Agreement is available to Greece is different for each Member State participating in those instruments.
Obdobje, med katerim je bila v skladu s Sporazumom med upnicami in Sporazumom o posojilu Grčiji dana na voljo finančna pomoč, je različno za vsako državo članico, ki sodeluje pri teh instrumentih.
In its conclusions of 23 and 24 June 2011, the European Council welcomed the Commission’s intention to enhance the synergies between the loan programme for Greece and the Union funds, and supported efforts to increase Greece’s capacity to absorb Union funds, with the aim of stimulating growth and employment by refocusing on improving competitiveness and employment creation.
(12) Evropski svet je v sklepih z dne 23. in 24. junija 2011 pozdravil namero Komisije za povečanje sinergij med programom posojil za Grčijo in skladi Unije ter podprl prizadevanja za povečanje grške sposobnosti črpanja iz skladov Unije, katerih cilj je spodbuditi rast in zaposlovanje s preusmeritvijo na izboljšanje konkurenčnosti in ustvarjanje delovnih mest.
Moreover, it welcomed and supported the preparation, by the Commission, together with the Member States, of a comprehensive programme of technical assistance to Greece.
Pozdravil in podprl je tudi celovit program tehnične pomoči Grčiji, ki ga Komisija pripravlja skupaj z državami članicami.
This Regulation contributes to such efforts to enhance synergies.
Ta uredba prispeva k tem prizadevanjem za povečanje sinergij.
In order to facilitate the management of Union funding, to help accelerate investments in Member States and regions and to increase the impact of funding on the economy, it is necessary to allow, in justified cases, temporarily and without prejudice to the 2014 to 2020 programming period, an increase of interim payments from the European Fisheries Fund by an amount corresponding to 10 percentage points above the co-financing rate applicable for each priority axis for Member States that are facing serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability and that have requested to benefit from this measure, resulting in a corresponding reduction in the national counterpart.
Da bi se olajšalo upravljanje sredstev Unije in pospešilo naložbe v državah članicah in regijah ter povečalo vpliv financiranja na gospodarstvo, je potrebno v upravičenih primerih ter začasno in brez poseganja v programsko obdobje 2014–2020 omogočiti povečanje vmesnih plačil iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo, in sicer za znesek, ki za deset odstotnih točk presega stopnjo sofinanciranja, ki se uporablja za vsako prednostno os za države članice, ki se soočajo s hudimi težavami, kar zadeva njihovo finančno stabilnost in ki so zaprosile za koriščenje tega ukrepa, zaradi česar se je ustrezno zmanjšala nacionalna protipostavka.
Due to the temporary nature of that increase, and in order to maintain the original co-financing rates as the reference point for calculation of the temporarily increased amounts, the changes resulting from application of the mechanism should not be reflected in the financial plan included in the operational programmes.
Ker je povečanje začasno, začasno povečane zneske pa bi bilo treba še naprej izračunavati na podlagi prvotnih stopenj sofinanciranja, se spremembe zaradi uporabe mehanizma ne bi smele odražati v finančnem načrtu, vključenem v operativne programe.
However, it should be possible to update operational programmes in order to concentrate the funds on competitiveness, growth and employment, and in order to align their targets and objectives with the decrease in the total funding available.
Vendar bi bilo treba omogočiti posodabljanje operativnih programov, da bi sredstva usmerili v konkurenčnost, rast in zaposlovanje ter da bi njihove cilje prilagodili zmanjšanju celotnih sredstev na voljo.
A Member State making a request to the Commission to benefit from a derogation under this Regulation should submit all the information necessary to enable the Commission to establish, by means of data on the Member State’s macroeconomic and fiscal situation, that resources for the national counterpart are not available.
Država članica, ki prosi Komisijo za odstopanje na podlagi te uredbe, bi morala predložiti vse potrebne informacije, s pomočjo katerih bo lahko Komisija prek podatkov o makroekonomskem in fiskalnem položaju države članice ugotovila, da sredstva za nacionalno protipostavko niso na voljo.
It should also show that an increase of payments resulting from the granting of the derogation is necessary to safeguard the continued implementation of operational programmes and that the absorption capacity problems persist even if the maximum ceilings applicable to co-financing rates laid down in Article 53(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 [10] are used.
Ravno tako bi morala prikazati, da je povečanje plačil na podlagi odstopanja potrebno, da se zagotovi nadaljnje izvajanje operativnih programov, ter da se bodo težave z absorpcijsko sposobnostjo nadaljevale kljub uporabi najvišjih stopenj sofinanciranja iz člena 53(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 [10].
The Member State making a request to the Commission to benefit from a derogation under this Regulation should also provide the reference to the relevant Council Decision or other legal act pursuant to which it is eligible to benefit from the derogation.
Država članica, ki prosi Komisijo za odstopanje na podlagi te uredbe, bi morala navesti tudi ustrezen sklep Sveta ali drug pravni akt, na podlagi katerega je upravičena do odstopanja.
It is necessary for the Commission to have an appropriate period, starting from the submission of the Member State’s request, in which to verify the correctness of the information submitted and to raise any objections.
Komisija bi morala imeti ustrezen rok, ki bi začel teči z vložitvijo prošnje države članice, da preveri pravilnost predloženih informacij in predloži pripombe.
In order to make the derogation effective and operational, there should be a presumption that such a request is justified if the Commission does not raise an objection.
Da bi bilo odstopanje učinkovito in bi se začelo uporabljati, bi bilo treba vključiti predpostavko, da se taka prošnja šteje za utemeljeno, če Komisija ne predloži pripomb.
If the Commission objects to the Member State’s request, it should adopt, by way of implementing acts, a decision to this effect, stating reasons.
Če Komisija nasprotuje prošnji države članice, bi morala o tem z izvedbenimi akti sprejeti sklep in navesti razloge.
The rules on the calculation of interim payments and of payments of the final balance for operational programmes during the period in which the Member States receive the Union financial assistance for addressing serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability should be revised accordingly.
Pravila za izračun vmesnih in končnih plačil za operativne programe v obdobju, v katerem države članice prejemajo finančno pomoč Unije za odpravljanje hudih težav s finančno stabilnostjo, je treba ustrezno proučiti.
It is necessary to ensure that there is appropriate reporting on the use of the increased amounts made available to the Member States benefiting from a temporary increase in interim payments under this Regulation.
Treba je zagotoviti ustrezno poročanje o uporabi povečanih zneskov, ki se dajo na voljo državam članicam, upravičenim do začasnega povečanja vmesnih plačil na podlagi te uredbe.
After the end of the period during which financial assistance has been made available, it might be necessary for the evaluations carried out in accordance with Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 to assess, inter alia, whether the reduction of the national co-funding leads to a significant departure from the goals that were initially set.
Po koncu obdobja, v katerem je bila dana na razpolago finančna pomoč, bi bilo morda treba v ocenah, opravljenih v skladu s členom 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1198/2006, med drugim oceniti, ali znižanje nacionalnega sofinanciranja ne povzroča znatne oddaljitve od prvotno zastavljenih ciljev.
Such evaluations might lead to the revision of the operational programme.
Take ocene lahko privedejo do ponovne preučitve operativnega programa.
As the unprecedented crisis affecting international financial markets and the unprecedented economic downturn, which have seriously damaged the financial stability of several Member States, necessitate a rapid response in order to counter the effects on the economy as a whole, this Regulation should enter into force as soon as possible.
Glede na to, da kriza, kakršne v zgodovini ne pomnimo in ki je prizadela mednarodne finančne trge ter povzročila upad gospodarstva, kar je resno omajalo finančno stabilnost številnih držav članic, zahteva nagel odziv, ki bo ublažil njen vpliv na celotno gospodarstvo, bi ta uredba morala začeti veljati takoj, ko bo to mogoče.
Given the exceptional circumstances of the Member States concerned, it should apply retroactively, starting either from the budgetary year of 2010 or from the date on which the financial assistance was made available, depending on the requesting Member State’s status, for the periods during which the Member States received financial assistance from the Union or from other euro area Member States in order to address serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability.
Glede na izjemne okoliščine zadevnih držav članic bi se morala uporabljati retroaktivno, z začetkom od proračunskega leta 2010 ali od dne, ko je bila finančna pomoč dana na voljo, odvisno od statusa države članice prosilke, in sicer za vsa obdobja, v katerih so države članice prejemale finančno pomoč od Unije ali druge države članice euroobmočja, da se začnejo odpravljati hude težave držav s finančno stabilnostjo.
Where a temporary increase in interim payments is envisaged, that temporary increase should also be considered in the context of the budgetary restraints facing all Member States, and those budgetary restraints should be reflected appropriately in the general budget of the European Union.
Če je predvideno začasno povečanje vmesnih plačil, bi ga bilo treba obravnavati tudi glede na proračunske omejitve, s katerimi se soočajo vse države članice, te proračunske omejitve pa bi se morale ustrezno odražati v splošnem proračunu Evropske unije.
In addition, since the main purpose of the mechanism is to address specific current difficulties, its application should be limited in time.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba uporabo mehanizma časovno omejiti, saj je njegov glavni namen odpraviti trenutne specifične težave.
Therefore, the mechanism should start to apply on 1 January 2010 and should operate for a limited period until 31 December 2013.
Mehanizem bi se torej moral začeti uporabljati 1. januarja 2010 in bi moral delovati omejeno obdobje do 31. decembra 2013.
Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 1198/2006 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1198/2006 se spremeni:
Articles 76 and 77 are replaced by the following:
Člena 76 in 77 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Interim payments shall be calculated by applying — to the public contribution declared in the statement of expenditure certified by the certifying authority under each priority axis and under each convergence/non-convergence objective — the co-financing rate established under the current financing plan for that priority axis and that objective.
Vmesna plačila se izračunajo tako, da se za javni prispevek, prijavljen v izkazu o izdatkih in potrjen s strani organa za potrjevanje, v okviru vsake prednostne osi in vsakega cilja konvergenca ali cilja, ki ni cilj konvergenca, uporabi stopnja sofinanciranja, določena v okviru tekočega finančnega načrta za to prednostno os in ta cilj.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, in response to a specific and properly grounded request by the Member State, an interim payment shall be calculated as the amount of Union assistance paid or due to be paid to the beneficiaries in respect of the priority axis and of the objective.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 je kot odziv na posebno in ustrezno utemeljeno zahtevo države članice vmesno plačilo izračunano kot znesek pomoči Unije, ki je bil plačan ali mora biti plačan upravičencem glede na prednostno os in cilj.