natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any such contract should respect the rules of data protection and data security and take into account the role of the relevant data protection authorities applicable to the SIS, in particular the provisions of the Schengen Convention and of this Regulation.
Vsaka tovrstna pogodba bi morala spoštovati pravila o varstvu in varnosti podatkov ter upoštevati vlogo ustreznih organov za varstvo podatkov, ki se uporabljajo za SIS, zlasti določbe Schengenske konvencije in te uredbe.
Following the political orientation and subject to the conditions laid down in the Financial Regulation, the Commission would be invited, in case of switchover to the alternative solution, to delegate the budget implementation tasks related to the development of the SIS II based on SIS 1+ RE to France.
V skladu s politično usmeritvijo in ob upoštevanju pogojev iz finančne uredbe bi bila Komisija v primeru preklopa na nadomestno rešitev pozvana, da naloge izvrševanja proračuna, povezane z razvojem SIS II na podlagi SIS 1+ RE, prenese na Francijo.
Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA, as well as Decision No 574/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of the General Programme Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows [13], included SIS II national developments among the eligible actions to be co-financed under the External Borders Fund (EBF).
Uredba (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklep 2007/533/PNZ ter Odločba št. 574/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Sklada za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ [13] so vključili nacionalni razvoj SIS II med upravičene ukrepe, ki se sofinancirajo iz Sklada za zunanje meje (EBF).
Commission Decision 2007/599/EC of 27 August 2007 implementing Decision No 574/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the adoption of strategic guidelines for 2007 to 2013 [14] further identified SIS II as one of the five strategic priorities under the EBF, recognising the importance of supporting the coherent and timely development of the national projects alongside the central SIS II.
Tudi Odločba Komisije 2007/599/ES z dne 27. avgusta 2007 o izvajanju Odločbe št. 574/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi s sprejetjem strateških smernic za obdobje 2007–2013 [14] potrjuje SIS II kot eno od petih strateških prednostnih nalog Sklada za zunanje meje, saj priznava pomen zagotavljanja podpore skladnemu in pravočasnemu razvoju nacionalnih projektov hkrati s centralnim SIS II.
Since the adoption of those legal acts, the SIS II project received a significant reorientation in the course of 2010, after the completion of an important test campaign, the ‘Milestone 1’.
Od sprejetja navedenih pravnih aktov je bil projekt SIS II bistveno preusmerjen v letu 2010 po zaključku pomembnega preskušanja „Mejnik 1“.
Furthermore, the evolutions in the use of the SIS by the Member States led to a need to update the SIS II technical requirements concerning performance and storage capacity which affected the costs of the SIS II project both at central and national level.
Poleg tega je zaradi razvoja pri uporabi SIS s strani držav članic nastala potreba po posodobitvi tehničnih zahtev SIS II v zvezi z uspešnostjo delovanja sistema in njegovo pomnilniško zmogljivostjo, kar je vplivalo na stroške projekta SIS II na centralni in nacionalni ravni.
With regard to the migration process from SIS 1+ to SIS II, the evolution in requirements and the advances made in the completion of the SIS II project led to a redefinition of the migration architecture, of the migration calendar and of the testing requirements.
Kar zadeva proces migracije s SIS 1+ na SIS II, sta razvoj zahtev in napredek pri izvajanju projekta SIS II povzročila ponovno opredelitev strukture za migracijo, časovnega razporeda migracije in zahtev glede preskušanja.
An important part of the activities that would now be required at Member State level for the migration to SIS II were not anticipated at the time when Regulation (EC) No 1104/2008 and Decision 2008/839/JHA were adopted or at the time when the financial package and the multiannual programmes under the EBF were drawn up.
Pomemben del dejavnosti, ki bi jih bilo treba zdaj izvajati na ravni držav članic zaradi migracije na SIS II, ni bil predviden niti ob sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 1104/2008 in Sklepa 2008/839/PNZ niti med pripravo finančnega svežnja in večletnih programov v okviru Sklada za zunanje meje.
It is, therefore, necessary to partly realign the cost distribution principles for the migration from SIS 1+ to SIS II.
Zato je treba delno ponovno uskladiti načela porazdelitve stroškov za migracijo s SIS 1+ na SIS II.
Certain national activities related to that migration, in particular in connection with the participation of Member States in migration-related testing activities could be co-financed from the SIS II budget line of the general budget of the Union.
Nekatere nacionalne dejavnosti v zvezi s to migracijo, zlasti v zvezi s sodelovanjem držav članic pri dejavnostih preskušanja, povezanih z migracijo, bi se lahko sofinancirale iz proračunske postavke splošnega proračuna Unije, namenjene SIS II.
That possibility should cover specific and well-defined activities beyond, and not to coincide with, other SIS II related actions which would continue to be supported under the EBF.
Ta možnost bi morala pokriti posebne in dobro opredeljene dejavnosti, ki bi presegale in se ne bi prekrivale z drugimi ukrepi, povezanimi s SIS II, ki bi imeli še naprej podporo prek Sklada za zunanje meje.
The financial assistance thus provided under this Regulation should be complementary to that provided by the EBF.
Finančna podpora, zagotovljena na podagi te uredbe, bi tako dopolnjevala pomoč iz Sklada za zunanje meje.
In relation to the co-financing provided under this Regulation, appropriate measures should be taken to prevent irregularities and fraud and the necessary steps should be taken to recover funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests [15], Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities’ financial interests against fraud and other irregularities [16], and Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) [17].
V zvezi s sofinanciranjem na podlagi te uredbe bi bilo treba sprejeti ukrepe, da se preprečijo nepravilnosti in goljufije ter izterjajo izgubljena, nepravilno plačana ali nepravilno porabljena sredstva v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 z dne 18. decembra 1995 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti [15], Uredbo Sveta (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96 z dne 11. novembra 1996 o pregledih in inšpekcijah na kraju samem, ki jih opravlja Komisija za zaščito finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi nepravilnostmi [16], in Uredbo (ES) št. 1073/1999 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. maja 1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) [17].
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, taking into consideration the financial impacts of the decision upon Member States, which should remain fully involved when the Commission exercises its implementing powers, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Da bi se zagotovili enotni pogoji za izvajanje te uredbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila, pri tem pa upoštevati finančne posledice zadevne odločitve za države članice, s katerimi bi morala Komisija pri izvajanju svojih izvedbenih pooblastil v celoti sodelovati.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers [18].
Navedena pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije [18].
The Commission and the Member States should continue to cooperate closely during all steps of the development of the SIS II and the migration from SIS 1+ to SIS II in order to complete the process.
Komisija in države članice bi morale še naprej tesno sodelovati v vseh fazah razvoja SIS II in migracije s SIS 1+ na SIS II, da bi se ta proces uspešno zaključil.
In the Council conclusions on SIS II of 26-27 February 2009 and 4-5 June 2009, an informal body consisting of the experts of the Member States and designated as the Global Programme Management Board, was established to enhance the cooperation and to provide direct Member States support to the central SIS II project.
S sklepi Sveta o SIS II z zasedanj 26. in 27. februarja 2009 ter 4. in 5. junija 2009 je bilo ustanovljeno neformalno telo, sestavljeno iz strokovnjakov držav članic in imenovano Odbor za upravljanje globalnega programa, ki naj bi okrepilo sodelovanje in zagotovilo neposredno podporo držav članic centralnemu projektu SIS II.
The positive result of the work of that group of experts and the necessity of further enhancing the cooperation and the transparency of the central SIS II project justify the formal integration of the group of experts into the SIS II management structure.
Pozitivni rezultat dela te skupine strokovnjakov ter nujnost nadaljnje krepitve sodelovanja in povečanja preglednosti centralnega SIS II upravičujeta formalno vključitev skupine strokovnjakov v strukturo upravljanja SIS II.
A group of experts, called the Global Programme Management Board, should therefore be formally established to complement the current SIS II organisational structure.
Zato bi bilo treba formalno ustanoviti skupino strokovnjakov, imenovano Odbor za upravljanje globalnega programa, ki bo dopolnila sedanjo organizacijsko strukturo SIS II.
In order to ensure efficiency as well as cost effectiveness the number of experts should be limited.
Da bi zagotovili uspešnost in stroškovno učinkovitost, bi bilo treba omejiti število strokovnjakov.
The activities of the Global Programme Management Board should be without prejudice to the responsibilities of the Commission and of the Member States.
Dejavnosti Odbora za upravljanje globalnega programa ne bi smele posegati v pristojnosti Komisije in držav članic.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [19] applies to the processing of personal data by the Commission.
Komisija pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov uporablja Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [19].
National Supervisory Authorities are responsible for supervising the processing of SIS 1+ personal data on the territory of their respective Member States and remain responsible for monitoring the lawfulness of the processing of SIS II personal data on the territory of their respective Member States.
Nacionalni nadzorni organi so odgovorni za nadzor obdelave osebnih podatkov v SIS 1+ na ozemlju svoje države članice in so še naprej odgovorni za spremljanje zakonitosti obdelave osebnih podatkov v SIS II na ozemlju posamezne države članice.
Therefore, while for reasons of legal certainty the switchover phase and the intensive monitoring period during which the interim migration architecture continues to exist should be as short as possible, the Council should, in case of technical difficulties, be enabled to fix the final date for the termination of migration in accordance with Article 55(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Article 71(2) of Decision 2007/533/JHA.
Zato bi sicer faza preklopa in obdobje intenzivnega spremljanja, ko začasna struktura za migracijo še obstaja, zaradi pravne varnosti morala biti čim krajša in Svet bi moral imeti možnost, da v primeru tehničnih težav določi končni datum za dokončanje migracije v skladu s členom 55(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006 in členom 71(2) Sklepa 2007/533/PNZ.
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely setting up the interim migration architecture and migrating the data from SIS 1+ to SIS II, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can, therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker ciljev te uredbe, torej vzpostavitve začasne strukture za migracijo ter prenos podatkov s SIS 1+ na SIS II, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se te cilje zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepa lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In order to give effect in 2012 to the financial facility which could be provided to Member States from the general budget of the Union in accordance with this Regulation, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following its publication.
Da bi v letu 2012 začel učinkovati finančni instrument, ki bi lahko bil državam članicam zagotovljen iz splošnega proračuna Unije v skladu s to uredbo, bi ta uredba morala začeti veljati dan po objavi.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [20] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [21] on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement.
Ta uredba predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [20], ki spadajo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES [21] o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma.
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [22] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [23].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [22], ki spadajo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [23].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [24] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point G, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/350/EU [25].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [24], ki spadajo na področje iz točke G člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2011/350/EU [25].
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
The United Kingdom is taking part in this Regulation, in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Protocol (No 19) on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and Article 8(2) of Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [26].
Združeno kraljestvo sodeluje pri tej uredbi v skladu s členom 5(1) Protokola (št. 19) o schengenskem pravnem redu, vključenem v okvir Evropske unije, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, in členom 8(2) Sklepa Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [26].
Ireland is taking part in this Regulation, in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Protocol (No 19) on the Schengen acquis integrated into the framework of the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [27].
Irska sodeluje pri tej uredbi v skladu s členom 5(1) Protokola (št. 19) o schengenskem pravnem redu, vključenem v okvir Evropske unije, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, in členom 6(2) Sklepa Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [27].
This Regulation is without prejudice to the arrangements for the partial participation of Ireland and the United Kingdom in the Schengen acquis as determined by Decisions 2000/365/EC and 2002/192/EC respectively.
Ta uredba ne posega v dogovora o delnem sodelovanju Irske in Združenega kraljestva pri izvajanju schengenskega pravnega reda, kakor sta določena v sklepih Sveta 2000/365/ES oziroma 2002/192/ES.
As regards Cyprus, this Regulation constitutes an act building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Za Ciper ta uredba predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted and delivered an opinion on 9 July 2012 [28],
(44) Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov je, po z njim opravljenem posvetovanju, podal mnenje 9. julija 2012 [28] –
The Schengen Information System (SIS), set up pursuant to the provisions of Title IV of the Schengen Convention (SIS 1+), shall be replaced by a new system, the Schengen Information System II (SIS II), the establishment, operation and use of which is regulated by Decision 2007/533/JHA.
Schengenski informacijski sistem (SIS), vzpostavljen v skladu z določbami naslova IV Schengenske konvencije (SIS 1+), se nadomesti z novim sistemom, schengenskim informacijskim sistemom II (SIS II), katerega vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporabo ureja Sklep 2007/533/PNZ.
‘Central SIS II’ means the technical support function of SIS II containing a database, the ‘SIS II database’, and a uniform national interface (NI-SIS);
„centralni SIS II“ pomeni tehnični podporni del SIS II, ki vsebuje podatkovno zbirko (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „podatkovna zbirka SIS II“) in enoten nacionalni vmesnik (NI-SIS);
SIS’ means the technical support function of SIS 1+, containing the reference database for SIS 1+ and the uniform national interface (N.COM);
SIS“ pomeni tehnični podporni del SIS 1+, ki vsebuje referenčno podatkovno zbirko za SIS 1+ in enoten nacionalni vmesnik (N.COM);
SIS’ means the national system of SIS 1+, consisting of the national data systems which communicate with C.SIS;
SIS“ pomeni nacionalni sistem SIS 1+, sestavljen iz nacionalnih podatkovnih sistemov, ki so povezani s C.SIS;
SIS II’ means the national system of SIS II, consisting of the national data systems which communicate with Central SIS II;
SIS II“ pomeni nacionalni sistem SIS II, sestavljen iz nacionalnih podatkovnih sistemov, ki so povezani s centralnim SIS II;
‘converter’ means a technical tool to allow consistent and reliable communication between C.SIS and Central SIS II, ensuring the functionalities provided for in Article 10(3) and allowing the conversion and synchronisation of data between C.SIS and Central SIS II;
„pretvornik“ pomeni tehnično orodje, ki omogoča skladno in zanesljivo povezavo med C.SIS in centralnim SIS II ter zagotavlja funkcije iz člena 10(3) in omogoča pretvorbo in usklajevanje podatkov med C.SIS in centralnim SIS II;
This Regulation defines the tasks and responsibilities of the Commission and the Member States participating in SIS 1+ with respect to the following tasks:
Ta uredba določa naloge in odgovornosti Komisije in držav članic, ki sodelujejo v SIS 1+, v zvezi z naslednjimi nalogami:
the establishment and testing of an interim migration architecture;
vzpostavitvi in preskušanju začasne strukture za migracijo;
Technical components of the interim migration architecture
Tehnični elementi začasne strukture za migracijo
In order to ensure the migration from SIS 1+ to SIS II, the following components shall be made available to the extent necessary:
Za zagotovitev migracije s SIS 1+ na SIS II se v potrebnem obsegu zagotovijo naslednji elementi:
the C.SIS and the connection to the converter;
C.SIS in povezava s pretvornikom;
Central SIS II, NI-SIS and the communication infrastructure for SIS II allowing the Central SIS II to communicate with N.SIS II and the converter;
centralni SIS II, NI-SIS in komunikacijska infrastruktura za SIS II, ki omogoča povezavo centralnega SIS II z N.SIS II in pretvornikom;
Implementing acts necessary to continue the development of SIS II as referred to in Article 5(1), in particular the measures necessary for the correction of errors, shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure defined in Article 17(2).
Izvedbeni akti, potrebni za nadaljnji razvoj SIS II iz člena 5(1), zlasti ukrepi, potrebni za odpravo napak, se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom pregleda iz člena 17(2).