natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [6], and in particular Articles 55, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [7], and in particular Articles 62, 164, 165 and 166 thereof,having regard to Rule 76 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [6], zlasti členov 55, 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [7], zlasti členov 62, 164, 165 in 166 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju člena 76 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0096/2013),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0096/2013),
A. whereas, pursuant to Article 17(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the Commission shall execute the budget and manage programmes and shall do so, pursuant to Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in cooperation with the Member States, on its own responsibility, having regard to the principle of sound financial management,
A. ker Komisija v skladu s členom 17(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji izvršuje proračun in upravlja programe, v skladu s členom 317 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pa to počne v sodelovanju z državami članicami na lastno odgovornost, pri čemer upošteva načelo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja,
B. whereas the special reports of the Court of Auditors provide information on issues of concern related to the implementation of funds, which are thus useful for Parliament in exercising its role of discharge authority,
B. ker posebna poročila Računskega sodišča vsebujejo podatke, ki se nanašajo na vprašanja izvrševanja sredstev, zato so Parlamentu v pomoč pri opravljanju njegovih nalog organa za razrešnico,
C. whereas its observations on the special reports of the Court of Auditors form an integral part of Parliament’s abovementioned Decision of 17 April 2013 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, Section III – Commission,
C. ker so ugotovitve iz posebnih poročil Računskega sodišča sestavni del navedenega sklepa Parlamenta z dne 17. aprila 2013 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011, oddelek III – Komisija,
Special Report No 12/2011 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Have EU measures contributed to adapting the capacity of the fishing fleets to available fishing opportunities?’
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 12/2011 z naslovom „Ali so ukrepi EU prispevali k prilagoditvi zmogljivosti ribolovnih flot razpoložljivim ribolovnim možnostim?“
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ report and notes its damning appraisal of the measures undertaken by both the Commission and Member States;
pozdravlja poročilo Računskega sodišča in je seznanjen z njegovo neusmiljeno oceno ukrepov, ki so jih sprejele Komisija in države članice;
Emphasises the fact that the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) claims to promote sustainable fishing, which implies the long-term viability of the fishing sector and a balance between fishing resources and the capacity of the fishing fleet in order to avoid overexploitation of fish stocks;
poudarja, da naj bi skupna ribiška politika spodbujala trajnostni ribolov, kar pomeni dolgoročno preživetje ribiškega sektorja ter ravnovesje med ribolovnimi viri in ribolovno floto, da se prepreči pretirano izkoriščanje ribjih staležev;
Takes note that although the reduction of fishing overcapacity has been a recurrent theme in previous reforms of the CFP and has been addressed in the Court of Auditors’ Special Reports No 3/1993 and No 7/2007, the expensive measures taken to date to reduce fishing overcapacity by adapting the fishing fleet to fishing resources have been unsuccessful;
ugotavlja, da je bilo zmanjšanje presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti sicer ponavljajoča se tema pri prejšnjih reformah skupne ribiške politike in je bilo obravnavano v posebnih poročilih Računskega sodišča št. 3/1993 in 7/2007, a so bili doslej sprejeti dragi ukrepi za zmanjšanje presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti s prilagajanjem ribolovne flote ribolovnim virom neuspešni;
Recognises that from 1995, the trend for Union fish catches has been declining and that, according to the Commission’s Green Paper on reform of the CFP of 22 April 2009 (COM(2009) 163), this decline is largely due to overfishing and forms part of a vicious circle involving fishing overcapacity and low economic performance of the fishing fleets;
priznava, da se trend ulova rib v Uniji od leta 1995 zmanjšuje in da je po mnenju Komisije iz zelene knjige o reformi skupne ribiške politike z dne 22. aprila 2009 (COM(2009) 163) ta upad v veliki meri posledica prelova in je del začaranega kroga med presežno ribolovno zmogljivostjo in nizko gospodarsko uspešnostjo ribolovnih flot;
Is concerned that since the last reform of the CFP in 2002, fish catches have declined by 1000000 tonnes and jobs in the fishing sector have declined from 421000 to 351000;
je zaskrbljen, saj se je ulov rib od zadnje reforme skupne ribiške politike leta 2002 zmanjšal za 1000000 ton, število zaposlitev v ribiškem sektorju pa s 421000 na 351000;
Notes that although there is no official definition of overcapacity, declining catches and lost jobs caused by overfished fish stocks demonstrate de facto overcapacity;
ugotavlja, da čeprav uradna opredelitev presežne zmogljivosti ne obstaja, zmanjševanje ulova in izgubljena delovna mesta, ki jih je povzročilo čezmerno izkoriščanje staležev, dokazujejo dejansko presežno zmogljivost;
calls on the Commission to therefore define overcapacity and consider more relevant and robust measures to facilitate actions to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli „presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti“ in preuči pomembnejše in strožje ukrepe, da bi omogočila dejavnosti za doseganje ravnotežja med ribolovnimi zmogljivostmi in ribolovnimi možnostmi;
Believes that it is essential that the Commission urgently draft a report containing the data on existing overcapacity in the Union, broken down by fishery and country;
meni, da mora Komisija nujno pripraviti poročilo s podatki, ki se nanašajo na presežek zmogljivosti v Uniji, razvrščenimi po ribolovu in državah;
Is concerned, furthermore, that fleet capacity ceilings, as a measure to restrict the size of the fishing fleet, have become irrelevant since the actual fleet size is well under the ceilings and could even be 200000 tonnes bigger, while still complying with the rules;
poleg tega je zaskrbljen, ker so postale zgornje meje za zmogljivost flote kot ukrep za omejitev velikosti ribolovne flote nepomembne, saj je dejanska velikost flot precej pod to zgornjo mejo in bi lahko bila celo 200000 ton težja, pa bi bila še zmeraj v skladu s predpisi;
stresses that at the same time, due to technological advances, the fishing capacity of the fleets has increased with an average of 3 % per year during the last decade;
poudarja, da se je hkrati zaradi tehnološkega napredka ribolovna zmogljivost flot v zadnjem desetletju v povprečju povečevala za 3 % na leto;
Notes that the CFP measures vessel capacity in terms of power (kilowatt) and size (gross tonnage) and that, however, these measures do not take into account technological progress in fishing methods, which complicates the task of setting appropriate targets for its reduction;
ugotavlja, da skupna ribiška politika zmogljivost plovil meri z vidika moči (v kilovatih) in velikosti (bruto tonaža) in da te merske enote ne upoštevajo tehnološkega napredka na področju načinov ribolova, to pa otežuje določitev ustreznih ciljev za zmanjševanje;
notes that the Commission wants to maintain these static parameters until the end of 2015;
ugotavlja, da želi Komisija te statične parametre ohraniti do konca leta 2015;
Calls on the Commission to enforce the Member States’ obligation to correctly update their fleet register, and to establish the obligation to report on their efforts to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities;
poziva Komisijo, naj uveljavi obveznost držav članic glede pravilnega posodabljanja registrov flote in uvede obveznost poročanja o prizadevanjih za dosego ravnotežja med ribolovnimi zmogljivostmi in ribolovnimi možnostmi;
Notes that in terms of reducing fishing capacity, the Commission’s new proposal for the CFP is founded on a new, market-based approach (schemes for granting transferable fishing rights) since the Commission has reached the conclusion that these schemes have a positive role to play in reducing fishing overcapacity;
ugotavlja, da novi predlog Komisije za skupno ribiško politiko, kar zadeva zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti, temelji na novem, tržnem pristopu (sheme za dodeljevanje prenosljivih ribolovnih pravic), saj je Komisija ugotovila, da imajo te sheme pozitivno vlogo pri zmanjševanju presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti;
Expresses its concern at the shortcomings encountered in the rules for the treatment of fishing rights when fishing vessels are scrapped with public aid, and at the failure to define clear and effective criteria for selecting vessels;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkljivosti pri pravilih za obravnavanje ribolovnih pravic, kadar so ribiška plovila dana v razrez z javno pomočjo, pa tudi zato, ker niso bila opredeljena jasna in učinkovita merila za izbor plovil;
considers that the scrapping schemes have, in part, been poorly implemented, with examples of taxpayers’ money being used for the scrapping of already inactive vessels or even being used indirectly for building new vessels;
meni, da so bili programi razreza deloma slabo izvedeni, na primer ko se je denar davkoplačevalcev porabil za razrez že nedejavnih plovil ali celo neposredno uporabil za gradnjo novih plovil;
notes, however, that some Member States have had scrapping schemes that have fulfilled their purpose;
vendar ugotavlja, da so v nekaterih državah članicah programi razreza dosegli svoj namen;
stresses, therefore, the need of strict safeguards when using scrapping schemes, as a way of reducing overcapacity in order to avoid abuse;
zato poudarja, da so pri njihovem izvajanju potrebni strogi zaščitni ukrepi, da se zmanjšajo presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti in da bi preprečili zlorabe;
Regrets that investment on board fishing vessels, funded by the European Fisheries Fund (EFF), could increase the ability of individual vessels to catch fish;
obžaluje, da bi lahko naložbe v ribiška plovila, ki jih financira Evropski sklad za ribištvo (ESR), povečale dejanske ribolovne zmožnosti posameznih plovil;
considers that the interpretative note, prepared by the Commission and sent to Member States following the Court of Auditors’ Special Report on the ability of the vessels to catch fish in which the Court of Auditors called for national authorities to enforce stricter checks before deciding on the funding of projects of investments on board, is insufficient;
meni, da pojasnilo, ki ga je po posebnem poročilu Računskega sodišča o ribolovni zmogljivosti plovil, v katerem je to pozvalo nacionalne organe, naj pred odločitvijo o financiranju naložb v plovila izvedejo strožje preglede, pripravila Komisija in poslala državam članicam, ni zadostno;
Notes that whereas point 36 of Special Report No 12/2011 says that, by the end of 2010, implementation of the EFF, in terms of expenditure certified by Member States, amounted to EUR 645 million, or 15 % of the amount available from 2007 to 2013, most of this amount was declared in 2010 and EUR 292 million had still not been paid by the Commission as at 31 December 2010, owing to the Council’s late adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 on the European Fisheries Fund [8] and the complexity involved in the initial setting-up of management and control systems by the Member States;
ugotavlja, da točka 36 posebnega poročila št. 12/2011 sicer navaja, da je do konca leta 2010 izvrševanje Evropskega sklada za ribištvo v smislu odhodkov, ki jih potrdijo države članice, znašalo 645 milijonov EUR ali 15 % zneska, ki je na voljo za obdobje od 2007 do 2013, da je bila večina tega zneska prijavljena v letu 2010 in da Komisija do 31. decembra 2010 še vedno ni izplačala 292 milijonov EUR, ker je Svet prepozno potrdil Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 z dne 27. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo [8] in ker je bilo vzpostavljanje sistemov za upravljanje in nadzor v državah članicah zelo kompleksno;
notes that certified interim payments sent by Member States by the end of December 2011 amounted to 28 % (EUR 1188 million) of the overall EFF allocation and welcomes the fact that the pace of absorption of the EFF is now picking up;
ugotavlja, da bodo potrjena vmesna plačila, ki so jih do konca decembra 2011 poslale države članice, znašala 28 % (1188 milijonov EUR) celotnih sredstev za Evropski sklad za ribištvo, in pozdravlja dejstvo, da se hitrost črpanja ESR trenutno povečuje;
Recommends that the Member States take measures to:
priporoča, naj države članice:
adapt their fishing fleets to the existing fishing opportunities,
svoje ribiške flote prilagodijo obstoječim ribolovnim možnostim,
ensure that selection criteria for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes are designed to have a positive impact on the sustainability of the targeted fish stocks and avoid providing public aid for decommissioning inactive fishing vessels;
poskrbijo, da bodo izbirna merila v programih za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja zasnovana tako, da pozitivno učinkujejo na trajnost ciljnih ribjih staležev in da se prepreči zagotavljanje javne pomoči za umik neaktivnih ribiških plovil iz obratovanja;
Calls on the Commission to set effective fishing fleet capacity ceilings;
poziva Komisijo, naj določi učinkovite zgornje meje za zmogljivost ribolovne flote;
Considers that a reform of the CFP is needed to regionalise its implementation and the management of its programmes and measures;
meni, da potrebujemo reformo skupne ribiške politike z regionalizacijo za izvajanje in upravljanje njenih programov in ukrepov;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendations that:
se strinja s priporočili Računskega sodišča, da je treba:
actions should be developed to effectively reduce overcapacity of the fishing fleet and to better define and measure fishing capacity and fishing overcapacity, while at the same time not disregarding that the remaining jobs in the fishing sector should be maintained,
pripraviti ukrepe za uspešno zmanjšanje presežne zmogljivosti ribolovne flote ter za boljše določanje in merjenje ribolovne zmogljivosti in presežne ribolovne zmogljivosti, hkrati pa ne pozabiti na to, da je treba ohraniti preostala delovna mesta v ribiškem sektorju,
the aid scheme for modernising vessels should be reconsidered and the role of fishing right transfer schemes clarified,
ponovno preučiti program pomoči za posodobitev plovil in pojasniti vlogo shem za prenos ribolovnih pravic,
clear selection rules should be established for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes,
določiti jasna izbirna merila za programe za umik ribiških plovil iz obratovanja,
Member States should implement the EFF on time and any publicly funded investments on board should not have an increased fishing ability as a result,
v državah članicah pravočasno izvrševati Evropski sklad za ribištvo, javno financirane naložbe v plovila pa ne smejo povečati ribolovne zmožnosti,
the fleet register should be correctly updated, and Member State reports should contain the required information and be of suitable quality,
pravilno posodabljati register flote, poročila držav članic pa morajo vsebovati zahtevane in primerne informacije;
Considers, moreover, that in the light of the Court of Auditors’ criticism, it has become clear that the EFF and CFP are currently an ineffective use of our common resources, and therefore welcomes the fact that the scheme will be reviewed in its entirety in the near future;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da je kritika Računskega sodišča pokazala, da se skupna sredstva Evropskega sklada za ribištvo in skupne ribiške politike trenutno uporabljajo neučinkovito, zato pozdravlja dejstvo, da bo celotna shema v bližnji prihodnosti pregledana;
highlights the importance, when re-structuring these schemes, of focusing on the areas within fisheries policy that can best be dealt with at Union level, such as the environmental aspects, rather than on various types of ineffective subsidy scheme;
poudarja, kako pomembno se je pri prestrukturiranju te sheme v okviru ribiške politike osredotočiti na področja, ki jih je najbolje obravnavati na ravni Unije, na primer okoljske vidike, ne pa na različne vrste neučinkovitih programov pomoči;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 13/2011;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 13/2011;
Recalls that the proper collection of value added tax (VAT) directly affects both the economies of Member States and the Union budget, as tax fraud, in particular VAT fraud, leads to exorbitant losses for the Union budget and the economies of Member States, thus exacerbating the debt crisis;
opozarja, da ustrezno pobiranje davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) neposredno vpliva tako na gospodarstva držav članic kot na proračun Unije, saj davčne goljufije, zlasti v zvezi z DDV, vodijo k precejšnjim izgubam za proračun Unije in gospodarstva držav članic, s tem pa poglabljajo dolžniško krizo;
points out that VAT fraud estimates amount to annual figures of around EUR 1400 million;
poudarja, da naj bi bila po ocenah vrednost goljufij v zvezi z DDV približno 1400 milijonov EUR letno;
Believes that particularly in the current economic climate, the emphasis should move to more efficient and fairer revenue collection systems;
meni, da bi bilo treba zlasti v sedanjih gospodarskih razmerah poudarek nameniti učinkovitejšim in pravičnejšim sistemom pobiranja prihodkov;
emphasises that the improvement of such systems should be of the utmost priority for the Union and all Member States, in particular those facing the biggest economic difficulties;
poudarja, da bi moralo biti izboljšanje teh sistemov glavna prednostna naloga Unije in vseh držav članic, zlasti tistih, ki se soočajo z največjimi gospodarskimi težavami;
Recalls that according to a study carried out on behalf of the Commission, the estimated average VAT gap in the Union is 12 %;
opominja, da je po študiji, ki je bila izvedena v imenu Komisije, povprečni primanjkljaj DDV v Uniji ocenjen na 12 %;
draws special attention to the fact that this VAT gap has been at an alarming level of 30 % and 22 % in Greece and Italy respectively, the Member States which are experiencing the most difficult debt crisis;
posebej opozarja na dejstvo, da je ta primanjkljaj v Grčiji in Italiji, državah članicah, ki se soočata z najhujšo dolžniško krizo, dosegel skrb zbujajočo raven 30 % oziroma 22 %;
Stresses that besides tax avoidance and losses due to insolvencies, the VAT gap is also attributable to fraud, non-transparent rules, incoherent control systems and non or partial implementation of Union law in Member States, and that VAT losses, translating into billions of euro, are largely compensated for by means of austerity measures, affecting citizens of the Union, and borne by citizens whose income is well documented and traceable;
poudarja, da je poleg izogibanja plačilu davka in izgub zaradi plačilne nesposobnosti primanjkljaj DDV mogoče pripisati goljufijam, nejasnim pravilom, neskladnim kontrolnim sistemom ter neizvajanju ali delnemu izvajanju zakonodaje Unije v državah članicah in da se izgube DDV v milijardah EUR v večini kompenzirajo z varčevalnimi ukrepi, ki prizadenejo vse državljane Unije, krijejo pa jih tisti državljani, katerih dohodek je dobro dokumentiran in sledljiv;
Is profoundly concerned about the Court of Auditors’ findings, in particular that the application of customs procedure 42 [9] alone accounted for the extrapolated losses of approximately EUR 2200 million in the seven Member States audited by the Court of Auditors in 2009, representing 29 % of the VAT theoretically applicable on the taxable amount of all the imports made under customs procedure 42 in 2009 in those Member States;
je globoko zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, zlasti zaradi ugotovitve, da je v letu 2009 že samo uporaba carinskega postopka 42 [9] prispevala k ekstrapoliranim izgubam v višini približno 2200 milijonov EUR v sedmih državah članicah, ki jih je to sodišče revidiralo, kar je 29 % DDV, ki bi se teoretično odmeril na davčno osnovo vsega uvoza, ki je bil leta 2009 opravljen po carinskem postopku 42 v teh državah;
Notes with concern that the Court of Auditors found that the Union’s regulatory framework does not ensure the uniform and sound management of this VAT exemption by Member States’ customs authorities and that the regulatory framework does not ensure that the information concerning those transactions is always made available to the tax authorities in the Member State of destination, leaving the system vulnerable to misuse by organised crime and individual fraudsters, creating huge competition disadvantages for bona fide traders;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da po navedbah Računskega sodišča ureditveni okvir Unije ne zagotavlja, da bi carinski organi držav članic dobro upravljali te oprostitve plačila DDV, prav tako pa ne zagotavlja, da bi bile informacije o teh transakcijah vedno na voljo davčnim organom v ciljnih državah članicah, zaradi česar lahko organizirani kriminal in posamezni goljufi zlorabljajo sistem in tako gospodarske subjekte, ki delujejo v dobri veri, postavljajo v precej slabši konkurenčni položaj;
Draws attention to the Court of Auditors’ finding that customs authorities in the audited Member States do not ensure the validity and completeness of data and the fulfilment of other exemption conditions;
opozarja na ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da carinski organi v revidiranih državah članicah ne zagotavljajo veljavnosti in popolnosti podatkov ter izpolnitve drugih pogojev za oprostitev;
Is concerned that the Court of Auditors found serious deficiencies in the control of simplified customs procedures, which account for 70 % of all customs procedures, in particular, poor-quality or poorly documented audits and automated data-processing techniques for carrying out checks during the processing of simplified procedures which are of little use;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče odkrilo hude pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru poenostavljenih carinskih postopkov, ki predstavljajo 70 % vseh carinskih postopkov, zlasti revizije slabe kakovosti ali s pomanjkljivo dokumentacijo ter neuporabne metode za samodejno obdelavo podatkov za izvajanje pregledov med poenostavljenimi postopki;
points out that those deficiencies have led to unjustified losses to the Union budget and that the correct operation of customs has a direct impact on the calculation of VAT;
poudarja, da so te pomanjkljivosti povzročile izgube za proračun Unije in da ima pravilno delovanje carine neposreden vpliv na izračun DDV;
deplores the fact that the Commission did not take appropriate measures to remedy this over the last 10 years but was hiding behind the rules, which seemed quite adequate on paper;
obžaluje dejstvo, da Komisija v zadnjih desetih letih ni sprejela ustreznih popravnih ukrepov, ampak se je skrivala za pravili, ki so se na papirju zdela dokaj primerna;
Notes with regret that since its introduction, the VAT collection model has remained unchanged;
z obžalovanjem ugotavlja, da je model pobiranja DDV od uvedbe ostal nespremenjen;
believes that it is outdated, given the many changes to the technological and economic environment that have occurred;
meni, da je model zastarel, saj je medtem prišlo do mnogih sprememb tehnološkega in gospodarskega okolja;