natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC and Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 as regards the entries for Croatia in the lists of third countries or parts thereof from which the introduction of fresh meat and of certain meat products into the Union is authorised
o spremembi Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES in Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 glede vnosov za Hrvaško v seznamu tretjih držav ali delov tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen vnos svežega mesa ter nekaterih mesnih izdelkov v Unijo
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [1], and in particular the introductory phrase of Article 8, the first subparagraph of Article 8(1) and Article 8(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [1], in zlasti uvodnega stavka člena 8, prvega pododstavka člena 8(1) in člena 8(4) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2007/777/EC [2] lays down rules on imports into the Union and the transit and storage in the Union of consignments of meat products and consignments of treated stomachs, bladders and intestines, as defined in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin [3].
Odločba Komisije 2007/777/ES [2] določa pravila za uvoz v Unijo pošiljk mesnih izdelkov ter pošiljk obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev ter njihov tranzit in skladiščenje v Uniji, kakor so opredeljeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora [3].
Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC sets out the list of third countries or parts thereof from which the introduction into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines into the Union is authorised, provided that those commodities comply with the treatment referred to in that Part.
Del 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES določa seznam tretjih držav ali njihovih delov, iz katerih je dovoljen vnos mesnih izdelkov ter obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev v Unijo, če so navedeni izdelki obdelani v skladu z določbami iz navedenega seznama.
Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC sets out the treatments referred to in Part 2 of that Annex, assigning a code to each of those treatments.
Del 4 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES razlaga oznake, uporabljene za vrste obdelave v delu 2 navedene priloge, z dodelitvijo oznake vsaki od navedenih obdelav.
Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 provides that consignments of fresh meat intended for human consumption are to be imported into the Union only if they come from the third countries, territories or parts thereof listed in Part 1 of Annex II to that Regulation for which there is a model veterinary certificate corresponding to the consignment concerned listed in that Part.
Uredba (EU) št. 206/2010 določa, da se pošiljke svežega mesa, namenjenega za prehrano ljudi, v Unijo lahko uvozijo le, če prihajajo iz tretjih držav, njihovih ozemelj ali delov iz dela 1 Priloge II k navedeni uredbi, za katere v navedenem delu obstaja vzorec veterinarskega spričevala, ki ustreza zadevni pošiljki.
Croatia is currently listed in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 as a third country from which imports of fresh meat of certain animals into the Union are authorised.
Hrvaška je trenutno uvrščena na seznam v delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 kot tretja država, iz katere je dovoljen uvoz svežega mesa nekaterih živali v Unijo.
However, Croatia is currently not listed as a third country from which imports of fresh meat, including minced meat, of domestic porcine animals into the Union are authorised.
Vendar Hrvaška trenutno ni uvrščena na seznam tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz svežega mesa, vključno z mletim mesom, domačih prašičev v Unijo.
Croatia has submitted to the Commission a request to be authorised to export fresh meat of domestic porcine animals into the Union.
Hrvaška je Komisiji predložila zahtevek za odobritev izvoza svežega mesa domačih prašičev v Unijo.
According to the information submitted by Croatia, preventive vaccination against classical swine fever is prohibited on the territory of that third country since January 2005.
V skladu z informacijami, ki jih je predložila Hrvaška, je preventivno cepljenje proti klasični prašičji kugi na ozemlju navedene tretje države prepovedano od januarja 2005.
In addition, there is no evidence of classical swine fever virus circulation in domestic porcine animals on the territory of Croatia since March 2008.
Poleg tega od marca 2008 na ozemlju Hrvaške ni bilo nobenih znakov prisotnosti virusa klasične prašičje kuge pri domačih prašičih.
The information available therefore indicates that Croatia is free from classical swine fever in domestic porcine animals, without vaccination.
Informacije, ki so na voljo, torej kažejo, da na Hrvaškem tudi brez cepljenja klasična prašičja kuga pri domačih prašičih ni prisotna.
The Croatian competent authority has also provided sufficient guarantees as regards compliance with the Union legislation regarding classical swine fever and it is implementing an enhanced surveillance programme for domestic porcine animals and wild boar.
Hrvaški pristojni organ je predložil tudi zadostna jamstva glede skladnosti z zakonodajo Unije v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo in izvaja program povečanega nadzora nad domačimi in divjimi prašiči.
In addition, the results of an inspection carried out by the Commission in Croatia in 2010 were largely positive.
Poleg tega so bili rezultati inšpekcijskih pregledov, ki jih je Komisija izvedla na Hrvaškem leta 2010, v glavnem pozitivni.
Croatia has also submitted to the Commission the confirmation that certain planned corrective actions regarding the shortcomings identified during that inspection were satifactorily implemented in 2011.
Hrvaška je Komisiji predložila tudi potrdilo, da so bili nekateri načrtovani korektivni ukrepi glede pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene med navedenim inšpekcijskim pregledom, leta 2011 zadovoljivo izvedeni.
The evaluation of the information submitted by Croatia leads to the conclusion that the introduction into the Union of fresh meat of domestic porcine animals from that third country does not constitute a risk to the Union health status with regard to classical swine fever.
Ocena informacij, ki jih je predložila Hrvaška, vodi do zaključka, da uvoz svežega mesa domačih prašičev v Unijo iz navedene tretje države ne pomeni tveganja za poslabšanje zdravstvenega statusa Unije v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo.
Imports from Croatia of fresh meat, including minced meat, of domestic porcine animals into the Union should therefore be permitted.
Uvoz svežega mesa domačih prašičev iz Hrvaške v Unijo, vključno z mletim mesom, bi bilo zato treba dovoliti.
In addition, Croatia is currently listed in Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC for the introduction into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines from domestic porcine animals and farmed cloven-hoofed game (swine) which have undergone the specific treatment ‘D’.
Poleg tega je Hrvaška trenutno uvrščena na seznam dela 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES o vnosu mesnih izdelkov ter obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev domačih prašičev ter gojene parkljaste divjadi (prašičev), ki so bili predmet posebne obdelave „D“.
In view of the fact that imports of fresh meat, including minced meat, of domestic porcine animals into the Union from Croatia are to be authorised, it is appropriate to also permit imports into the Union from that third country of meat products which were obtained from such fresh meat, without requiring that they undergo a specific treatment.
Glede na dejstvo, da je treba odobriti uvoz svežega mesa domačih prašičev v Unijo iz Hrvaške, vključno z mletim mesom, je primerno, da se dovoli tudi uvoz mesnih izdelkov, ki so bili pridobljeni iz takega svežega mesa, v Unijo iz navedene tretje države brez zahteve po posebni obdelavi.
Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Del 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decision 2007/777/EC and Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2007/777/ES in Uredbo (EU) št. 206/2010 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC, the entry for Croatia is replaced by the following:
V delu 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES se vnos za Hrvaško nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010, the entry for Croatia is replaced by the following:
V delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 se vnos za Hrvaško nadomesti z naslednjim:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1037/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1037/2012
approving the active substance isopyrazam, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobritvi aktivne snovi izopirazam v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in o spremembi Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the United Kingdom received on 25 November 2008 an application from Syngenta Crop Protection AG for the inclusion of the active substance isopyrazam in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Združeno kraljestvo 25. novembra 2008 prejelo zahtevek podjetja Syngenta Crop Protection AG za vključitev aktivne snovi izopirazam v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2010/132/EU confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
S Sklepom 2010/132/EU je bilo potrjeno, da je dokumentacija „popolna“ v smislu načelnega izpolnjevanja zahtev po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 4 May 2010.
Država članica poročevalka je 4. maja 2010 predložila osnutek poročila o oceni.
The draft assessment report was reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’).
Osnutek poročila o oceni so pregledale države članice in Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija).
The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance isopyrazam [4] on 27 February 2012.
Agencija je 27. februarja 2012 Komisiji predložila sklep o pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo izopirazam [4].
The draft assessment report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and was finalised on 28 September 2012 in the format of the Commission review report for isopyrazam.
Osnutek poročila o oceni so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 28. septembra 2012 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu izopirazama.
It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing isopyrazam may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) and Article 5(3) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
Različne preiskave so pokazale, da se za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo izopirazam, lahko pričakuje, da na splošno izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) ter člena 5(3) Direktive 91/414/EGS, zlasti v zvezi z uporabami, ki so bile proučene in podrobno navedene v poročilu Komisije o pregledu.
It is therefore appropriate to approve isopyrazam.
Zato je primerno, da se izopirazam odobri.
In accordance with Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in conjunction with Article 6 thereof and in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge, it is, however, necessary to include certain conditions and restrictions.
V skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 v povezavi s členom 6 navedene uredbe ter ob upoštevanju sedanjih znanstvenih in tehničnih dognanj pa je treba vključiti nekatere pogoje in omejitve.
Member States should be allowed a period of six months after approval to review authorisations of plant protection products containing isopyrazam.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba po odobritvi omogočiti šestmesečno obdobje, da pregledajo registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo izopirazam.
However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I to that Directive or the Regulations approving active substances.
Vendar ta razjasnitev državam članicam ali imetnikom registracij ne nalaga novih obveznosti v primerjavi z doslej sprejetimi direktivami o spremembah Priloge I k navedeni direktivi ali uredbami, s katerimi so bile odobrene aktivne snovi.
The active substance isopyrazam, as specified in Annex I, is approved subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Aktivna snov izopirazam, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi I, se odobri v skladu s pogoji iz navedene priloge.
Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing isopyrazam as an active substance by 30 September 2013.
Države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 do 30. septembra 2013 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo veljavne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo izopirazam kot aktivno snov.
By that date they shall in particular verify that the conditions in Annex I to this Regulation are met, with the exception of those identified in the column on specific provisions of that Annex, and that the holder of the authorisation has, or has access to, a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to Directive 91/414/EEC in accordance with the conditions of Article 13(1) to (4) of that Directive and Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Do navedenega datuma zlasti preverijo, ali so izpolnjeni pogoji iz Priloge I k tej uredbi, z izjemo tistih iz stolpca o posebnih določbah iz navedene priloge, in ali ima imetnik registracije dokumentacijo ali dostop do dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge II k Direktivi 91/414/EGS v skladu s pogoji iz člena 13(1) do (4) navedene direktive ter člena 62 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing isopyrazam as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances, all of which were listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 by 31 March 2013 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC and taking into account the column on specific provisions of Annex I to this Regulation.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice znova ocenijo vsako registrirano fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje izopirazam kot edino aktivno snov ali kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, vključenih v Prilogo k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 najpozneje do 31. marca 2013, po enotnih načelih iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, na podlagi dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, in ob upoštevanju stolpca o posebnih določbah iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
in the case of a product containing isopyrazam as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 30 September 2014 at the latest; or
če sredstvo vsebuje izopirazam kot edino aktivno snov, najpozneje do 30. septembra 2014 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo registracijo, ali
in the case of a product containing isopyrazam as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 30 September 2014 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective act or acts which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC or approved that substance or substances, whichever is the latest.
če sredstvo vsebuje izopirazam kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, registracijo po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo najpozneje do 30. septembra 2014 ali do datuma, določenega za tako spremembo ali preklic v ustreznih aktih, s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi dodane v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS oziroma s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi odobrene, pri čemer se upošteva poznejši datum.
OJ L 52, 3.3.2010, p. 51.
UL L 52, 3.3.2010, str. 51.
CAS No 881685-58-1
št. CAS 881685-58-1
(syn-isomer: 683777-13-1/anti-isomer: 683777-14-2)
(sin-izomer: 683777-13-1 / anti-izomer: 683777-14-2)
CIPAC No 963
št. CIPAC 963
A mixture of 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-[(1RS,4SR,9RS)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9-isopropyl-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5-yl]pyrazole-4-carboxamide
Mešanica 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-[(1RS,4SR,9RS)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9-isopropyl-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5-yl]pyrazole-4-carboxamide
(syn-isomer – 50:50 mix of two enantiomers)
(sin-izomer – mešanica dveh enantiomerov v razmerju 50:50)
(anti-isomer– 50:50 mix of two enantiomers)
(anti-izomer – mešanica dveh enantiomerov v razmerju 50:50)
In a range of 78:15 % to 100:0 % syn to anti.
V razmerju sin:anti od 78:15 % do 100:0 %.
In a range of 78:15 % to 100:0 % syn- to anti-isomers
V razmerju sin:anti izomerov od 78:15 % do 100:0 %.
1 April 2013
1. april 2013
31 March 2023
31. marec 2023
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on isopyrazam, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 28 September 2012 shall be taken into account.
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu izopirazama in zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali pripravil 28. septembra 2012.
the risk to earthworms if the substance is applied in the framework of no cultivation/minimum cultivation practices;
tveganje za deževnike, če se snov uporablja pri postopkih brez obdelave ali z minimalno obdelavo;
the protection of groundwater, when the substance is applied in regions with vulnerable soil and/or climatic conditions.
zaščito podtalnice, kadar se snov uporablja na območjih z občutljivimi tlemi in/ali neugodnimi podnebnimi razmerami.
Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, like the exclusion of no cultivation/minimum cultivation practices, and the obligation to carry out monitoring programmes to verify potential groundwater contamination in vulnerable zones, where appropriate.
Pogoji uporabe vključujejo ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja, kot je odprava postopkov brez obdelave ali z minimalno obdelavo, in obveznost izvajanja programov za spremljanje morebitnega onesnaženja podtalnice na občutljivih območjih, kadar je to primerno.
The applicant shall submit confirmatory information as regards the relevance of the metabolites CSCD 459488 and CSCD 459489 for groundwater.
Vlagatelj predloži potrditvene informacije o vplivu metabolitov CSCD 459488 in CSCD 459489 na podtalnico.
The applicant shall submit to the Commission, the Member States and the Authority this information by 31 March 2015.
Vlagatelj Komisiji, državam članicam in Agenciji take informacije predloži do 31. marca 2015.
The applicant shall submit to the Commission, the Member States and the Authority this information by 31 March 2015.’
Vlagatelj Komisiji, državam članicam in Agenciji take informacije predloži do 31. marca 2015.“
For isopyrazam the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2010/132/EU [3].
S Sklepom Komisije 2010/132/EU [3] je bilo potrjeno, da izopirazam izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 80(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1038/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1038/2012
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1039/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1039/2012
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of aluminium radiators originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz aluminijastih radiatorjev s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
The Commission, by Regulation (EU) No 402/2012 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’), imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of aluminium radiators originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘the country concerned’).
Komisija je z Uredbo (EU) št. 402/2012 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasna uredba) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz aluminijastih radiatorjev s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK ali zadevna država).
The proceeding was initiated on 12 August 2011 [3], following a complaint lodged by the International Association of Aluminium Radiator Manufacturers Limited Liability Consortium (AIRAL S.c.r.l. - ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of total Union production of aluminium radiators.
Postopek se je začel 12. avgusta 2011 [3], po pritožbi, ki jo je vložil Konzorcij z omejeno odgovornostjo Mednarodnega združenja proizvajalcev aluminijastih radiatorjev (International Association of Aluminium Radiator Manufacturers Limited Liability Consortium, AIRAL S.c.r.l. – v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje Unije aluminijastih radiatorjev.
As set out in recital (14) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2010 do 30. junija 2011 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2008 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Preučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2008 do konca OP (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose a provisional anti-dumping duty (‘provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasno razkritje), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami.