natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, the combined actual financial results of TMP airport (taking into account the financial results of Airpro’s and Finavia’s activity at TMP airport, see tables in paragraphs (24) and (26)) show that due to the operation of the low-cost terminal the entire airport’s activity became profitable.
Poleg tega združeni dejanski finančni rezultati letališča TMP (pri čemer se upoštevajo finančni rezultati dejavnosti družb Airpro in Finavia na letališču TMP; glej preglednici v točkah obrazložitve (24) in (26)) kažejo, da je zaradi delovanja nizkocenovnega terminala postalo dobičkonosno delovanje celotnega letališča.
In view of the above, the Commission can conclude that Finavia’s decision to implement the low-cost strategy at TMP airport and the underlying financial arrangements are in line with the market economy investor test and therefore free of any economic advantage that does not correspond to normal market conditions.
Na podlagi navedenega lahko Komisija sklene, da so odločitev družbe Finavia glede izvajanja strategije zniževanja stroškov na letališču TMP in temeljne finančne ureditve v skladu z ravnanjem vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu ter tako ne vključujejo nobene gospodarske prednosti, ki ne ustreza običajnim tržnim pogojem.
As one of the cumulative criteria in Article 107(1) of the TFEU is not fulfilled, the Commission considers that Finavia’s decision to implement the low-cost strategy at TMP airport and the underlying financial arrangements are void of any State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the TFEU.
Ker eno od kumulativnih meril iz člena 107(1) PDEU ni izpolnjeno, Komisija meni, da odločitev družbe Finavia glede izvajanja strategije zniževanja stroškov na letališču TMP in temeljne finančne ureditve ne vključujejo državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
As regards a possible cross-subsidisation of Airpro by Finavia (such as lost rent revenue or compensation for operating losses), the Commission notes that given that all financial arrangements related to the low-cost strategy at TMP airport are based on an ex ante business plan in accordance with the market economy investor principle, that Airpro pays a market rent for the use of T2 and the full costs of Airpro’s activity at TMP airport are covered by the charges paid by the airlines using T2 (i.e. Ryanair), and that Finavia’s activity at TMP airport is profitable only due to the operation of T2, the cross-subsidisation of Airpro by Finavia can be excluded.
V zvezi z morebitnim navzkrižnim subvencioniranjem družbe Airpro s strani družbe Finavia (na primer izguba prihodka od najemnine ali nadomestilo izgub iz poslovanja) Komisija ugotavlja, da se navzkrižno subvencioniranje družbe Airpro s strani družbe Finavia glede na to, da vse finančne ureditve v zvezi s strategijo zniževanja stroškov na letališču TMP temeljijo na predhodnem poslovnem načrtu v skladu z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, da družba Airpro za uporabo T2 plačuje tržno najemnino in da se celotni stroški dejavnosti družbe Airpro na letališču TMP krijejo s pristojbinami, ki jih plačujejo letalske družbe, ki uporabljajo T2 (tj. Ryanair), ter da je delovanje družbe Finavia na letališču TMP dobičkonosno le zaradi delovanja T2, lahko izključi.
Does the agreement between Airpro and Ryanair constitute State aid?
Ali sporazum med družbama Airpro in Ryanair pomeni državno pomoč?
As regards the agreement between Airpro and Ryanair, Finland has argued that Airpro acted as a market economy operator would have done in a similar situation.
V zvezi s sporazumom med družbama Airpro in Ryanair Finska trdi, da je družba Airpro ravnala tako, kot bi v podobnem položaju ravnal nosilec dejavnosti v tržnem gospodarstvu.
If this is the case, Ryanair has not been favoured by the agreement and no State aid is involved.
V tem primeru sporazum ni dajal prednosti družbi Ryanair in ni vključeval državne pomoči.
In assessing whether the agreement was concluded under normal market conditions, the Commission has to examine whether in similar circumstances an airport operating under normal market economy conditions and guided by prospects of long-term profitability would have entered into the same or similar commercial arrangements as Airpro [24].
V okviru ocene, ali je bil sporazum sklenjen pod običajnimi tržnimi pogoji, mora Komisija proučiti, ali bi letališče, ki deluje pod običajnimi pogoji tržnega gospodarstva in upošteva možnost dolgoročne dobičkonosnosti, v podobnih okoliščinah sklenilo enake ali podobne poslovne dogovore kot družba Airpro [24].
Furthermore, the Commission has to analyse the expected impact of the agreement on Airpro’s and Finavia’s activity at TMP airport on the basis of an integrated approach taking into account all the features of the measure in question [25].
Poleg tega mora Komisija na podlagi celostnega pristopa analizirati pričakovani učinek sporazuma na dejavnosti družb Airpro in Finavia na letališču TMP, pri čemer upošteva vse značilnosti zadevnih ukrepov [25].
In order to be able to apply the private investor test, the Commission has to place itself in the context of the period when the agreement was signed.
Da bi Komisija lahko izvedla preizkus zasebnega vlagatelja, mora upoštevati razmere iz obdobja, v katerem je bil sporazum podpisan.
The Commission must also base its assessment on the information and assumptions available to the operator when the agreement was signed.
Komisija mora pri oceni upoštevati tudi informacije in predpostavke, ki so bile upravljavcu na voljo ob podpisu sporazuma.
Airpro signed the agreement with Ryanair on 3 April 2003 for a period of validity of […].
Družba Airpro je sporazum z družbo Ryanair podpisala 3. aprila 2003 za obdobje […].
Pursuant to the agreement, Ryanair committed itself to commencing operations at TMP airport with […] daily turnarounds.
V skladu s sporazumom se je družba Ryanair zavezala, da bo dejavnosti na letališču TMP začela z […] obračanji letal na dan.
On this basis Ryanair expected to generate approximately […] departing passengers at TMP airport during the first 12 months, and approximately […] departing passengers during the following 12 months.
Na podlagi tega je družba Ryanair predvidevala, da bo v prvih 12 mesecih doseženo število potnikov, ki bodo odleteli z letališča TMP, približno […], v naslednjih 12 mesecih pa približno […].
The agreement provides for a schedule of charges per turnaround depending on the number of daily frequencies (see in particular the tables in paragraph (43)).
V sporazumu je določen razpored pristojbin na obračanje letala glede na število dnevnih letov (glej zlasti preglednici v točki obrazložitve (43)).
The average price for one turnaround (based on three flights a day) is […].
Povprečna cena za eno obračanje letala (temelji na treh letih dnevno) je […].
The following table compares the charges paid by airlines using T1 at TMP airport and the average price paid by Ryanair:
V naslednji preglednici je primerjava pristojbin, ki jih plačujejo letalske družbe, ki na letališču TMP uporabljajo T1, in povprečno ceno, ki jo plačuje družba Ryanair:
Service provided
Opravljena storitev
Airport charges applicable at Terminal 1 (T1) in EUR
Letališke pristojbine na terminalu 1 (T1) v EUR
Airport charges paid by Ryanair (average fee) at Terminal 2 (T2)
Letališke pristojbine (povprečje), ki jih družba Ryanair plačuje na terminalu 2 (T2)
Terminal navigation charges
Pristojbine za navigacijske storitve na terminalu
Security charge
Pristojbine za varovanje
Terminal (passenger) services and ground handling
(Potniške) storitve na terminalu in zemeljska oskrba
Total price per turnaround
Skupna cena za obračanje letala
The Commission observes that Ryanair pays the same landing, terminal navigation and security charges as airlines using T1 at TMP airport.
Komisija ugotavlja, da družba Ryanair plačuje enake pristajalne pristojbine ter pristojbine za navigacijske storitve na terminalu in varovanje kot letalske družbe, ki na letališču TMP uporabljajo T1.
According to the information provided by Finland Ryanair is not exempted from the passenger fee.
Glede na informacije, ki jih je predložila Finska, družba Ryanair ni izvzeta iz plačila potniške pristojbine.
The only difference in the price paid by Ryanair relates to the charges paid for terminal (passenger) services and ground handling.
Cena, ki jo plačuje družba Ryanair, se razlikuje le v zvezi s pristojbinami za (potniške) storitve na terminalu in zemeljsko oskrbo.
However the quality of the services provided to Ryanair and its passengers at T2 is lower than the quality of services provided at T1, and the reduction achieved in underlying costs, in particular personnel costs, represents approximately […] of Airpro’s total costs (including the rent, landing and terminal navigation charges paid to Finavia).
Vendar je kakovost storitev, ki se družbi Ryanair in njenim potnikom zagotavljajo na T2, nižja od kakovosti storitev, zagotovljenih na T1, pri čemer doseženo zmanjšanje s tem povezanih stroškov, zlasti stroškov za osebje, znaša približno […] skupnih stroškov družbe Airpro (vključno z najemnino ter pristajalnimi pristojbinami in pristojbinami za navigacijske storitve na terminalu, ki jih plačuje družbi Finavia).
Contrary to T1, the number of staff at T2 is kept at a low level and the staff performs a variety of operations related to check-in, security checks and ground handling.
V nasprotju s T1 je število osebja na T2 ves čas majhno, pri čemer osebje opravlja različne dejavnosti v zvezi s prijavo na let, varnostnimi pregledi in zemeljsko oskrbo.
According to the information provided by the airport to the Commission’s expert, T2’s personnel costs are about […] lower than T1’s.
Glede na informacije, ki jih je letališče predložilo strokovnjaku Komisije, so stroški za osebje na T2 približno […] nižji kot na T1.
In addition, the Commission observes that the airport charges paid by Ryanair for the terminal (passenger) services and ground handling are only around […] lower than the charges paid at T1.
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da so letališke pristojbine, ki jih družba Ryanair plačuje za (potniške) storitve na terminalu in zemeljsko oskrbo, le približno […] nižje od pristojbin na T1.
The divergence between the cost savings (around […]) and the difference in the charges paid by airlines using the two terminals (around […]) reflects the additional profit margin generated by Airpro (around […], see also table in paragraph (20)).
Odstopanje v prihrankih (približno […]) in razlika v pristojbinah, ki jih plačujejo letalske družbe, ki uporabljajo zadevna terminala (približno […]), izražata dodatno stopnjo dobička družbe Airpro (približno[…]; glej tudi preglednico v točki obrazložitve (20)).
Hence, the Commission considers that the difference between the charges paid by Ryanair at T2 and those paid at T1 is justified.
Zato Komisija meni, da je razlika med pristojbinami družbe Ryanair na T2 in pristojbinami na T1 utemeljena.
On the basis of the above, Airpro was able to forecast the revenue generated by the agreement with Ryanair.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je družba Airpro lahko napovedala prihodke, ustvarjene s sporazumom z družbo Ryanair.
Airpro assumed that in year 1 Ryanair would perform […] daily turnarounds with a load factor of […]; as of year 2 it was expected that Ryanair would operate […] daily turnarounds for the remaining period of validity of the agreement with the same load factor as in year 1.
Družba Airpro je predvidevala, da bo družba Ryanair v prvem letu opravljala […] obračanj letal na dan s faktorjem obremenitve […], medtem ko bo od drugega leta do konca obdobja veljavnosti sporazuma opravljala […] obračanj letal na dan z enakim faktorjem obremenitve kot v prvem letu.
The result takes into account Airpro’s aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues (including the car park revenue, etc.).
V rezultatu so upoštevani letalski in neletalski prihodki družbe Airpro (vključno s prihodki od parkirnin itd.).
Airpro’s costs over the period of validity of the agreement were estimated by using the projected costs related to the implementation of the low-cost strategy at TMP airport.
Stroški družbe Airpro v obdobju veljavnosti sporazuma so bili ocenjeni na podlagi predvidenih stroškov, povezanih z izvajanjem strategije zniževanja stroškov na letališču TMP.
For instance, the costs of personnel were expected to amount to […] per turnaround (and […] when calculated on the basis of daily aircraft turnaround).
Pričakovalo se je, da bodo na primer stroški za osebje znašali […] na obračanje letala (in […], izračunano na podlagi dnevnih obračanj letal).
The following table summarises the revenue and cost calculations related to the agreement and the positive contribution of the agreement to the equity value of Airpro during its period of validity.
V naslednji preglednici je povzetek izračunov prihodkov in stroškov v zvezi s sporazumom ter pozitivnega prispevka sporazuma k vrednosti lastnega kapitala družbe Airpro v obdobju njegove veljavnosti.
These calculations are based on the business plan provided by Finland and the assumptions set out above.
Ti izračuni temeljijo na poslovnem načrtu, ki ga je predložila Finska, in zgoraj opredeljenih predpostavkah.
The Commission notes that during its period of validity the agreement with Ryanair was expected to generate a positive contribution to Airpro’s equity value, with an NPV amounting to EUR 0,5 million. Furthermore Airpro’s and Finavia’s overall activity at TMP airport was expected to be positive over the period of validity of the agreement.
Komisija ugotavlja, da se je pričakovalo, da bo sporazum z družbo Ryanair v obdobju veljavnosti pozitivno prispeval k vrednosti lastnega kapitala družbe Airpro, pri čemer naj bi neto sedanja vrednost znašala 0,5 milijona EUR. Poleg tega se je pričakovalo, da bo splošno delovanje družb Airpro in Finavia na letališču TMP v obdobju veljavnosti sporazuma pozitivno.
The Commission also observes that the revenues stemming from the agreement cover all of Airpro’s costs at TMP airport and all of Finavia’s costs related to the agreement.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da prihodki, ki izhajajo iz sporazuma, krijejo vse stroške družbe Airpro na letališču TMP in vse stroške družbe Finavia, povezane s sporazumom.
The full-cost approach in this case includes the cost of capital (i.e. depreciation costs for the airport infrastructure) and operating costs (such as costs of personnel, energy, material, etc.).
Pristop skupnih stroškov v tem primeru vključuje stroške kapitala (tj. stroške amortizacije za letališko infrastrukturo) in stroške poslovanja (na primer stroške za osebje, električno energijo, material itd).
It also includes costs for security and safety measures that may represent measures falling within the public policy remit which would not be considered an economic activity within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the TFEU.
Vključuje tudi stroške za ukrepe varovanja in varnosti, ki lahko pomenijo ukrepe na področju javne politike, kar se ne bi štelo za gospodarsko dejavnost v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
Thus the calculated NPV is underestimated and the positive contribution of the agreement may indeed be even higher.
Izračunana neto sedanja vrednost je torej podcenjena, zato je mogoče, da je pozitivni prispevek sporazuma dejansko višji.
The Commission observes that on the basis of the ex ante business plan the decision of Airpro, as a subsidiary of Finavia, to conclude the agreement in question with Ryanair was in line with the conduct of a market economy investor.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je na podlagi predhodnega poslovnega načrta odločitev družbe Airpro kot hčerinske družbe družbe Finavia glede sklenitve zadevnega sporazuma z družbo Ryanair v skladu z ravnanjem vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.
The Commission further notes that the assumptions of the ex ante business plan and the expected results of the agreement are further supported by the actual positive results of Airpro’s activity at TMP airport (see in particular the table in paragraph (26)).
Komisija nadalje ugotavlja, da predpostavke iz predhodnega poslovnega načrta in pričakovane rezultate sporazuma podpirajo tudi dejanski pozitivni rezultati dejavnosti družbe Airpro na letališču TMP (glej zlasti preglednico v točki obrazložitve (26)).
Moreover, the combined actual financial results of TMP airport (taking into account the financial results of Airpro’s and Finavia’s activity at TMP airport, see in particular the tables in paragraphs (24) and (26)) show that not only the operations of the low-cost terminal but also those of the airport as a whole became profitable.
Poleg tega združeni dejanski finančni rezultati letališča TMP (pri čemer se upoštevajo finančni rezultati dejavnosti družb Airpro in Finavia na letališču TMP; glej zlasti preglednici v točkah obrazložitve (24) in (26)) kažejo, da ni postalo dobičkonosno le delovanje nizkocenovnega terminala, ampak tudi delovanje celotnega letališča.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that Airpro’s decision to enter into the agreement in question with Ryanair is in line with the market economy investor test and therefore free of any economic advantages that do not correspond to normal market conditions.
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija sklenila, da je odločitev družbe Airpro glede sklenitve zadevnega sporazuma z družbo Ryanair v skladu z ravnanjem vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu in zato ne vključuje nobenih gospodarskih prednosti, ki niso v skladu z običajnimi tržnimi pogoji.
As the cumulative criteria in Article 107(1) of the TFEU are not fulfilled, the Commission considers that the agreement of 3 April 2003 between Airpro and Ryanair is void of any State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the TFEU,
Ker kumulativna merila iz člena 107(1) PDEU niso izpolnjena, Komisija meni, da sporazum, ki sta ga 3. aprila 2003 sklenili družbi Airpro in Ryanair, ne vključuje državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU –
The measures taken by Finavia Oyj and Airpro Oy consisting of the financial arrangements related to the implementation of the low-cost strategy at Tampere-Pirkkala airport, in particular the refurbishment costs of Terminal 2 and the lease agreement for Terminal 2 concluded between Finavia Oyj and Airpro Oy on 23 February 2003, do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Ukrepi družb Finavia Oyj in Airpro Oy, ki vključujejo finančne ureditve v zvezi z izvajanjem strategije za zniževanje stroškov na letališču Tampere-Pirkkala, zlasti stroške prenove terminala 2 in zakupno pogodbo za terminal 2, ki sta jo družbi Finavia Oyj in Airpro Oy sklenili 23. februarja 2003, ne pomenijo pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The agreement concluded between Airpro Oy and Ryanair Ltd on 3 April 2003 does not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sporazum, ki sta ga družbi Airpro Oy in Ryanair Ltd sklenili 3. aprila 2003, ne pomeni pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Finsko.
OJ C 244, 18.10.2007, p. 13.
UL C 244, 18.10.2007, str. 13.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Z učinkom od 1. decembra 2009 sta člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES postala člen 107 oziroma člen 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should, where appropriate, be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanje na člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije razumeti kot sklicevanje na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this Decision.
V celotnem besedilu tega sklepa se uporablja izrazje iz PDEU.
Until the end of 2009 Finavia Oyj (formerly known as the Finnish Civil Aviation Administration) was a state enterprise.
Družba Finavia Oyj (prej imenovana Finska uprava za civilno letalstvo) je bila do konca leta 2009 v lasti države.
On 1 January 2010 Finavia was transformed into a public limited company by Act 877/2009 on the transformation of the Civil Aviation Administration into a public limited company.
Z Zakonom 877/2009 o preoblikovanju Uprave za civilno letalstvo v delniško družbo je bila družba Finavia 1. januarja 2010 preoblikovana v delniško družbo.
It manages 25 airports in Finland.
Družba Finavia upravlja 25 finskih letališč.
Only three Finnish airports are not managed by Finavia.
Na Finskem so le tri letališča, ki jih ta družba ne upravlja.
Besides operating Finnish airports, Finavia provides air navigation services at its own airports and it is also responsible for the supervision of Finnish airspace.
Poleg upravljanja finskih letališč ima družba Finavia na svojih letališčih navigacijske službe zračnega prometa in je odgovorna tudi za nadzor finskega zračnega prostora.
Finavia’s real estate operations are managed by its subsidiary Lentoasemakiinteistöt Oyj.
Za nepremičninsko poslovanje družbe Finavia je odgovorna njena hčerinska družba Lentoasemakiinteistöt Oyj.
That company offers facility services to companies operating at the airport and operates as a developer of construction projects and owner of premises located at the airports.
Ta družba družbam, ki delujejo na letališču, zagotavlja storitve v objektih ter opravlja vlogo razvijalca gradbenih projektov in lastnika prostorov na letališčih.
Airpro Oy is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Finavia (100 %).
Družba Airpro Oy je hčerinska družba, ki je v celoti v lasti družbe Finavia (100 %).
It develops and provides airport and travel services at Finavia’s airports.
Na letališčih družbe Finavia razvija in zagotavlja letališke in potovalne storitve.
Airpro has a subsidiary providing ground handling services called RTG Ground Handling Ltd.
Družba Airpro ima hčerinsko družbo RTG Ground Handling Ltd, ki opravlja storitve zemeljske oskrbe.
Business secret
Poslovna tajnost.
The renovation works included the creation of a check-in lobby, office facilities, toilet facilities and facilities for outbound and inbound passengers, facilities for personal security checks and for luggage, a cafeteria/restaurant and the refurbishment of electricity, piping, heating and air-conditioning systems as well as modifications of the infrastructure outside the terminal for pedestrians and motorists.
Obnovitvena dela so vključevala ureditev prostora za prijavo na let, pisarniških prostorov, sanitarij, prostorov za odhode in prihode, prostorov za varnostne preglede potnikov in prtljage, menze/restavracije ter prenovo električne in vodovodne napeljave in naprav za ogrevanje in klimatskih naprav ter spremembe infrastrukture za pešce in motoriste zunaj terminala.
The exchange rate of the euro as decided on 31 December 1998: FIM 5.94573.
Menjalni tečaj eura, kot je bil določen 31. decembra 1998: 5,94573 FIM.
The Routes trade fair is an annual flight route sale fair for airlines and airports.
Trgovinski sejem Routes je letni prodajni sejem prog letov za letalske družbe in letališča.
The Maximum Take-off Weight (MTOW) of an aircraft is the maximum weight at which the pilot of the aircraft is allowed to attempt to take off, due to structural or other limits.
Največja vzletna masa letala je največja masa ob upoštevanju strukturnih in drugih omejitev, pri kateri lahko pilot letala poskusi vzleteti.
In other words the MTOW is the heaviest weight at which the aircraft has been shown to meet all airworthiness requirements
Z drugimi besedami, največja vzletna masa je največja teža, pri kateri je letalo dokazalo izpolnjevanje vseh zahtev plovnosti.
According to Finland, AIP Finland is prepared in accordance with Annex 15 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and the Aeronautical Information Services Manual (ICAO Doc 8126).
Po navedbah Finske je finski AIP pripravljen v skladu s Prilogo 15 h Konvenciji o mednarodnem civilnem letalstvu in Priročnikom za letalske informacijske službe (dok. ICAO 8126).