natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, its AOC was issued on 8 May 2011 without providing evidence that the numerous deficiencies identified during the initial certification of the airline (desktop review of the operational and maintenance procedures in April 2011 and on-site audit carried out between 3 and 5 May 2011) had been effectively rectified prior to the issuance of the AOC.
Spričevalo letalskega prevoznika je bilo izdano 8. maja 2011, ne da bi se zagotovili dokazi, da so bile številne pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene pri začetni certifikaciji letalske družbe (pregled dokumentacije operativnih in vzdrževalnih postopkov v aprilu 2011 in revizija na kraju samem, opravljena med 3. in 5. majem 2011), učinkovito odpravljene pred izdajo spričevala.
The AOC was also issued without ensuring beforehand that the operator held the appropriate approvals for continuing airworthiness and maintenance.
Spričevalo letalskega prevoznika je bilo tudi izdano, ne da bi se predhodno preverilo, ali ima prevoznik ustrezne odobritve za stalno plovnost in vzdrževanje.
Furthermore, no evidence was provided that the air carrier is subject to continuous oversight in accordance with international safety standards.
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazano, da je ta prevoznik pod stalnim nadzorom v skladu z veljavnimi varnostnimi standardi.
ANAC also informed that the AOC of Mauritania Airways expired on 15 December 2010 and was not renewed as the air carrier ceased its activity.
ANAC je tudi obvestil, da je spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Mauritania Airways poteklo 15. decembra 2010, in da ni bilo obnovljeno, ker je prevoznik prekinil svoje dejavnosti.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that this carrier should be removed from Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba tega prevoznika umakniti iz Priloge A.
Mauritania informed that decisive actions have been undertaken to bring positive changes to its safety oversight system, including the amendment of the civil aviation legislation to align them with the Annexes to the Chicago Convention and changes to the ANAC's management, structure and staffing.
Mavretanija je obvestila, da so bili sprejeti odločni ukrepi, ki bi pripeljali do pozitivnih sprememb v sistemu za nadzor nad varnostjo, vključno s spremembo zakonodaje o civilnem letalstvu, s katero bi zakonodajo uskladili s prilogami k Čikaški konvenciji, in spremembami upravljanja, strukture in kadrovske politike ANAC.
The processes for the certification and the continuous surveillance of air carriers have also been updated and will become applicable in the near future.
Kmalu se bodo začeli uporabljati tudi posodobljeni postopki certificiranja in stalnega nadzora letalskih prevoznikov.
Whilst recognising that Mauritania still has work to do to address all findings, ICAO informed that Mauritania's commitment to resolve the safety deficiencies identified during the audit conducted in 2008 is to be commended.
Čeprav ICAO priznava, da si mora Mavretanija še naprej prizadevati za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, je pohvalila zavezanost Mavretanije k odpravi varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene pri reviziji, opravljeni aprila 2008.
The State has provided regular updates of its corrective action plan and significant progress is reported by the State.
Država je zagotovila redno posodobljene različice načrta korekcijskih ukrepov in poroča o bistvenem napredku.
The ICAO Coordinated Validation Mission (ICVM) scheduled in May 2012 will be an important step to validate the progress made.
Misija ICAO za usklajevanje in potrjevanje (ICVM), ki je načrtovana v maju 2012, bo pomenila pomemben korak za potrditev doseženega napredka.
The Commission welcomes the progress reported by the competent authorities of Mauritania in the rectification of the deficiencies identified by ICAO and encourages these authorities to pursue their actions with determination in due cooperation with ICAO.
Komisija pozdravlja napredek pri odpravi pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovila ICAO, o katerem so poročali pristojni organi Mavretanije, in spodbuja pristojne organe, naj odločno nadaljujejo z ukrepi in ustrezno sodelujejo z ICAO.
The Air Safety Committee will reassess the situation depending on the results of the ICAO Coordinated Validation Mission.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu bo ponovno ocenil stanje glede na izide misije ICAO za usklajevanje in potrjevanje.
The Commission has continued its consultations with the Competent Authority of Pakistan (PCAA) and Pakistan International Airways (PIA), and met with them on 20 February 2012 to review their progress in taking the actions described in their Corrective Action Plans (CAP).
Komisija nadaljuje posvetovanja s pristojnim organom Pakistana (PCAA) in letalskim prevoznikom Pakistan International Airways (PIA) ter se je z njima srečala 20. februarja 2012, da bi ocenila napredek pri sprejemanju ukrepov iz njunega načrta korekcijskih ukrepov (CAP).
The PCAA reported and provided evidence that they had increased the level of oversight of PIA, had taken regulatory action in suspending some Maintenance Licences, and had demanded significant changes to PIA's Quality Management System.
PCAA je poročal in tudi predložil dokaze o povečanju nadzora nad PIA, sprejetju ureditvenega ukrepa, s čimer so bile začasno preklicane nekatere licence za vzdrževanje zrakoplovov, in predložitvi zahteve po znatni spremembi sistemov za vodenje kakovosti PIA.
They reported on the successful outcome of the ICAO audit in June 2011 and explained their plans to adopt new regulations reflecting EASA Part 145 rules.
Poročal je o uspešnem izidu revizije, ki jo je junija 2011 izvedla ICAO, in pojasnil načrte za sprejetje novih predpisov, ki bodo odražali del 145 pravil EASA.
PIA reported that the actions detailed in their corrective action plan were now complete, except for in-depth checks of four aircraft which were currently undergoing maintenance.
PIA je poročal, da so izvedeni vsi podrobno navedeni ukrepi iz načrta korekcijskih ukrepov, razen podrobnega pregleda štirih zrakoplovov, na katerih se trenutno izvaja vzdrževanje.
They confirmed that an extensive training programme was now underway and would continue.
Potrdil je, da obsežni programi usposabljanja že potekajo, in da se bodo izvajali tudi v prihodnje.
EASA informed the Air Safety Committee that the findings of SAFA inspections of PIA aircraft had led to an opening of the procedure for the suspension of the EASA Part 145 maintenance organisation approval on 11 November 2011.
EASA je obvestila Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu, da so zaradi ugotovitev pri pregledih zrakoplovov PIA, ki jih je opravila SAFA, 11. novembra 2011 začeli postopek za preklic dovoljenja vzdrževalne organizacije EASA, del 145.
Whilst EASA noted that the corrective action plan of PIA appeared to identify the relevant safety issues they were unable to rely upon the PCAA to effectively monitor the performance of PIA’s maintenance standards and EASA had no option but to suspend the EASA Part-145 approval on 6 March 2012.
Medtem ko je EASA ugotovila, da naj bi načrt korekcijskih ukrepov PIA opredelil zadevna varnostna vprašanja, pa se EASA ni mogla zanesti na PCAA glede dejanskega spremljanja delovanja standardov za vzdrževanje PIA, tako da ni imela druge izbire in je 6. marca 2012 začasno preklicala dovoljenje EASA, del 145.
The Commission noted the progress made by both the PCAA and PIA in addressing the identified safety concerns, but confirmed that, should any significant event occur which gave rise to renewed concerns, then action to contain the safety risk would need to be taken.
Komisija je ugotovila doseženi napredek PCAA in PIA pri odpravljanju ugotovljenih varnostnih težav, vendar je potrdila, da bi bila v primeru, da bi se zaradi kakšnega pomembnega dogodka znova pojavili razlogi za zaskrbljenost, prisiljena ukrepati za preprečitev tveganja za varnost.
Member States shall therefore continue to verify the effective compliance with relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of this carrier pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 351/2008 of 16 April 2008 implementing Directive 2004/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the prioritisation of ramp inspections on aircraft using Community airports [11].
Države članice bodo zato še naprej preverjale dejansko izpolnjevanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov s prednostno razvrstitvijo preverjanj na ploščadi, ki jih je treba opraviti pri zrakoplovih tega prevoznika v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 351/2008 z dne 16. aprila 2008 o izvajanju Direktive 2004/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede prednostne razvrstitve preverjanj na ploščadi pri zrakoplovih, ki pristajajo na letališčih Skupnosti [11].
Air carriers from the Republic of the Philippines
Letalski prevozniki iz Republike Filipini
The CAAP did not respond adequately to requests for information by the Commission, failing in particular to provide the AOC of these air carriers together with the complete operations specifications; the CAAP also failed to demonstrate that the certification and continuous oversight of these air carriers comply fully with the applicable international safety standards.
CAAP se ni primerno odzval na zahteve Komisije za posredovanje podatkov, saj zlasti ni predložil spričeval teh letalskih prevoznikov, skupaj s priloženimi popolnimi specifikacijami dejavnosti; CAAP tudi ni dokazal, da certifikacija in stalni nadzor teh letalskih prevoznikov v celoti potekata v skladu z veljavnimi mednarodnimi varnostnimi standardi.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these air carriers should be equally included in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da je treba tudi te prevoznike vključiti v Prilogo A.
Several fatal accidents were reported involving air carriers certified in the Philippines since the last Air Safety Committee.
Od zadnjega Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu se je zgodilo več nesreč s smrtnim izidom, v katere so bili vpleteni letalski prevozniki, certificirani na Filipinih.
On 10 December 2011, an aircraft of type Beechcraft 65-80 with registration mark RP-C824 operated by Aviation Technology Innovator crashed into the Felixberto Serrano Elementary School near Manila, leading to the total loss of the aircraft as well as at least 14 fatalities; the CAAP did not respond to requests for information by the Commission on the preliminary findings of the accident investigation; the CAAP simply reported that the AOC was "inactive/surrendered" without however stating since when nor providing the related evidence.
10. decembra 2011 je na osnovno šolo Felixberto Serrano v Manili strmoglavil zrakoplov vrste Beechcraft 65-80 z registrsko oznako RP-C824, ki ga je upravljal prevoznik Aviation Technology Innovator, posledica katerega je bilo popolno uničenje zrakoplova in najmanj štirinajst smrtnih žrtev. CAAP ni odgovoril na zahteve Komisije za predložitev podatkov o predhodnih ugotovitvah preiskave nesreče; CAAP je Komisijo le obvestil, da je bilo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika „neaktivno/predano“, ne da bi navedel od kdaj ali zagotovil s tem povezane dokaze.
Another fatal accident occurred on 4 March 2012, involving an aircraft of type Cessna 172S registered RP-C209 operated by Avia Tours, leading to the total loss of the aircraft and two fatalities; although the CAAP provided preliminary information on the accident, the validity of the AOC could not be ascertained as the preliminary accident report indicates the AOC is valid until 14 August 2012 whilst the information provided by the CAAP reveals that the AOC had expired on 14 February 2012.
Druga nesreča s smrtnim izidom se je zgodila 4. marca 2012, ko je prišlo do strmoglavljenja zrakoplova vrste Cessna 172S z registrsko oznako RP-C209, ki ga je upravljal prevoznik Avia Tours, posledica katerega je bilo popolno uničenje zrakoplova in dve smrtni žrtvi; čeprav je CAAP zagotovil predhodne podatke o nesreči, veljavnosti spričevala letalskega prevoznika ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, saj predhodno poročilo o nesreči kaže, da je bilo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika veljavno do 14. avgusta 2012, medtem ko podatki, ki jih je zagotovil CAAP, kažejo, da je spričevalo letalskega prevoznika poteklo 14. februarja 2012.
The CAAP informed that several operators have an "inactive/surrendered" AOC or were recertified under PCAR Part-11 intended for aerial work.
CAAP je obvestil, da je spričevalo več letalskih prevoznikov „neaktivno/predano“, ali da so bili nekateri prevozniki ponovno certificirani v okviru dela 11 PCAR za delo v zraku.
However, the CAAP failed to provide evidence that the corresponding AOC had been revoked and evidence that these operators were no longer involved in commercial air transport.
Vendar CAAP ni zagotovil dokazov, da so bila zadevna spričevala preklicana oziroma, da se ti prevozniki ne ukvarjajo več s komercialnim zračnim prevozom.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these operators should remain in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi morali ti prevozniki ostati v Prilogi A.
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) carried out in January 2012 a one-week technical review in the Philippines in order to assess the progress of the CAAP towards compliance with international safety standards.
Zvezna uprava za letalstvo Združenih držav Amerike (FAA) je januarja 2012 na Filipinih opravila enotedenski tehnični pregled, da bi ocenila napredek CAAP glede izpolnjevanja mednarodnih varnostnih standardov.
The CAAP failed to provide detailed information on the outcome of this review.
CAAP ni predložil podrobnih podatkov o izidu tega pregleda.
However, no change has been noticed in the FAA assessment of the Philippines, which remain in category 2 so far, i.e. not compliant with international safety standards.
FAA v oceni Filipinov ni zaznala nobenih sprememb, tako da Filipini zaenkrat ostajajo v kategoriji 2, kar pomeni, da niso v skladu z mednarodnimi varnostnimi standardi.
Following the Air Safety Committee held in November 2011 [13] where the competent authorities of Russia (Russian Federal Air Transport Agency, FATA) informed and provided evidence that the operations of the air carriers Aviastar-TU, UTAir-Cargo, Tatarstan Airlines, Daghestan Airlines, Yakutia and Vim Avia (Vim Airlines) had been partially or fully restricted for safety reasons, the Commission has actively pursued the consultations with FATA in order to follow-up the developments.
Po zasedanju Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu novembra 2011 [13], kjer je pristojni organ Rusije (Russian Federal Air Transport Agency, FATA) obvestil, da je bilo opravljanje dejavnosti letalskih prevoznikov Aviastar-TU, UTAir-Cargo, Tatarstan Airlines, Daghestan Airlines, Yakutia in Vim Avia (Vim Airlines) delno ali v celoti omejeno zaradi varnostnih razlogov, in o tem predložil dokaze, je Komisija za spremljanje nadaljnjega razvoja aktivno nadaljevala posvetovanja s FATA.
Consultation meetings were held in Brussels on 19 December 2011 and 21 February 2012 between FATA and the Commission, EASA and certain Members of the Air Safety Committee.
Posvetovalna srečanja med FATA in Komisijo, EASA ter nekaterimi člani Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu so potekala 19. decembra 2011 in 21. februarja 2012 v Bruslju.
FATA informed about their intention to lift the restrictions imposed on part of the fleet of Tatarstan Airlines (aircraft of type Boeing B737-500, B737-400, B737-300, Tupolev 154M and Yakovlev Yak-42), Aviastar-TU (aircraft of type Tupolev Tu-204) and Yakutia (aircraft of type Boeing B757-200, B737-300 and B737-800) as FATA was satisfied with the results of inspections that were carried out on these carriers,
FATA je obvestil, da nameravajo odpraviti omejitve, ki veljajo za del flote letalskega prevoznika Tatarstan Airlines (zrakoplovi vrste Boeing B737-500, B737-400, B737-300, Tupolev 154M in Yakovlev Yak-42), letalskega prevoznika Aviastar-TU (zrakoplov vrste Tupolev Tu-204) in letalskega prevoznika Yakutia (zrakoplovi vrste Boeing B757-200, B737-300 in B737-800), saj so bili rezultati pregledov, ki so bili opravljeni pri teh letalskih prevoznikih, zadovoljivi,
FATA also provided evidence of further enforcement actions.
FATA je tudi predložil dokaze glede nadaljnjih izvršilnih ukrepov.
In particular, the AOC of Daghestan Airlines was revoked on 19 December 2011 due to the concerns arising from the audit carried out on the air carrier.
Spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Daghestan Airlines je bilo zaradi težav, ugotovljenih z revizijo, ki je bila opravljena pri tem letalskem prevozniku, preklicano 19. decembra 2011.
FATA also informed it had requested UTAir-Cargo to put in place additional corrective actions before the restrictions on its fleet could be removed.
FATA je še obvestil, da je bil letalski prevoznik UTAir-Cargo pozvan, naj uvede dodatne korekcijske ukrepe preden se omejitve, ki veljajo za njegovo floto, lahko odpravijo.
In order to ensure measures undertaken by FATA lead to sustainable safety improvement, Member States will continue to verify the effective compliance of Russian air carriers with the relevant safety standards through the prioritisation of ramp inspections to be carried out on aircraft of these carriers pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 351/2008 and may take measures accordingly to ensure these requirements are enforced.
Da bi zagotovili, da ukrepi, ki jih je sprejel FATA, trajnostno izboljšajo varnost, bodo države članice še naprej preverjale dejansko izpolnjevanje zadevnih varnostnih standardov s strani ruskih letalskih prevoznikov s prednostno razvrstitvijo preverjanj na ploščadi, ki jih je treba opraviti pri zrakoplovih tega letalskega prevoznika v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 351/2008, ter bodo lahko ustrezno ukrepale, da bi zagotovile, da se te zahteve izvajajo.
The Commission will continue to monitor their results.
Komisija bo še naprej spremljala njihove rezultate.
FATA confirmed that VIM AVIA remains subject to operating restrictions excluding flights into the EU (landing and overflights) on its entire fleet (8 aircraft of type Boeing B757-200) pending the full implementation of a corrective action plan.
FATA je potrdil, da za letalskega prevoznika Vim Avia še naprej veljajo omejitve, ki izključujejo lete v EU (pristajanje in preleti ozemlja) za celotno floto (osem zrakoplovov vrste Boeing B757-200), in sicer do popolne izvedbe načrta korekcijskih ukrepov.
Vim Avia appeared during the aforementioned meeting on 21 February 2012 to present the investments in safety, in particular in terms of training, but failed to demonstrate that it had succeeded in establishing a functioning safety management system.
Letalski prevoznik Vim Avia se je 21. februarja 2012 udeležil navedenega srečanja, da bi predstavil naložbe v varnost, in še zlasti v usposabljanje, vendar ni dokazal, da je vzpostavil delujoč sistem za upravljanje varnosti.
The carrier was not in a position yet to demonstrate that these investments were operative and effective.
Prevoznik še ni mogel dokazati, da so te naložbe delujoče in učinkovite.
FATA agreed to provide to the Commission the progress reports on the implementation of corrective measures by the carrier and the results of the subsequent inspection.
FATA se je strinjal, da bo Komisiji predložil poročilo o napredku pri izvajanju korekcijskih ukrepov s strani letalskega prevoznika in rezultate naknadnega pregleda.
In view of the above, taking into account the effective enforcement actions undertaken by competent authorities of Russia, it appears too early to re-assess the situation of this air carrier.
Glede na navedeno, ob upoštevanju dejanskih izvršilnih ukrepov, ki so jih sprejeli ruski pristojni organi, se zdi prezgodaj za ponovno oceno stanja tega letalskega prevoznika.
The Commission will examine the situation of Vim Avia in a future Air Safety Committee, based on the reports provided by the competent authorities of Russia and on their decision regarding the continuation of the current restrictions.
Komisija bo preučila stanje letalskega prevoznika Vim Avia na prihodnjem Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu na podlagi poročil, ki jih bodo predložili ruski pristojni organi, in njihove odločitve glede nadaljevanja sedanjih omejitev.
Air carriers from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Letalski prevozniki iz Bolivarske republike Venezuele
There is verified evidence of numerous serious safety deficiencies on the part of the air carrier Conviasa certified in Venezuela.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o številnih resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih pri letalskem prevozniku Conviasa, certificiranem v Venezueli.
These deficiencies have been identified by the competent authorities of Spain during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [14].
Te pomanjkljivosti so med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi v okviru programa SAFA [14], ugotovili pristojni organi Španije.
Conviasa demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies.
Letalski prevoznik Conviasa je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
Conviasa did not respond timely and adequately to all deficiencies notified by the civil aviation authority of Spain.
Conviasa se ni pravočasno in primerno odzval na vse pomanjkljivosti, o katerih so ga obvestili španski organi za civilno letalstvo.
The repetition of these non-compliances shows systemic safety deficiencies in the area of operations and maintenance.
Ponavljanje teh neskladnosti kaže na sistemske varnostne pomanjkljivosti na področju opravljanja dejavnosti in vzdrževanja.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered in August 2011 into consultation with the competent authorities of Venezuela, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations of Conviasa and asking for clarifications regarding the actions undertaken by the competent authorities as well as the carrier to respond to these deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti avgusta 2011 začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Venezuele, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti opravljanja dejavnosti prevoznika Conviasa ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi in prevoznik sprejeli v odgovor na te pomanjkljivosti.
These authorities failed to respond timely and adequately to the enquiries by the Commission regarding the safety oversight of Conviasa, as the requested information, in particular information on the progress of the accident investigation, recommendations stemming from these investigations, the actions undertaken to address the possible causes of the accidents and the carrier’s operations specifications, requirements and restrictions attached to the AOC, were not submitted.
Ti organi se niso pravočasno in primerno odzvali na preiskavo Komisije glede nadzora nad varnostjo prevoznika Conviasa, saj Komisija ni prejela zahtevanih podatkov, še zlasti podatkov o napredovanju preiskave nesreče, priporočil, oblikovanih na podlagi te preiskave, ukrepov, ki so bili sprejeti za odpravo ugotovljenih vzrokov nesreče, ter specifikacij dejavnosti prevoznika, zahtev in omejitev, ki so priložena spričevalu letalskega prevoznika.
It stated that all findings identified in ramp inspections had been responded to.
Povedal je, da so bile odpravljene vse pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene pri preverjanjih na ploščadi.
The Committee noted there was considerable on-going work between the air carrier and the competent authorities of Spain.
Odbor se je seznanil s trenutnim sodelovanjem med letalskim prevoznikom in pristojnimi organi Španije.
However the air carrier failed to explain the repetition of non-compliance findings of similar nature identified in subsequent inspections.
Vendar pa letalski prevoznik ni obrazložil ponavljanja neskladnosti podobne narave, ugotovljenih v nadaljnjih pregledih.
The air carrier further failed to provide any information on the causes of the above mentioned fatal accidents and the actions undertaken to prevent their recurrence.
Letalski prevoznik tudi ni predložil nobenih podatkov glede vzrokov navedenih nesreč s smrtnim izidom in glede ukrepov, ki so jih sprejeli, da bi preprečili ponovitev takšnih nesreč.