natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Directive 2005/36/EC allows Member States to check the professional qualifications of the service provider prior to the first provision of service in the case of regulated professions that have public health or safety implications.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES državam članicam omogoča, da v primeru reguliranih poklicev, ki vplivajo na javno zdravje ali varnost, poklicne kvalifikacije ponudnika storitev preverijo pred prvim opravljanjem storitve.
This has led to legal uncertainty leaving it to the discretion of a competent authority to decide on the need for such a prior check.
Zaradi tega se je pojavila pravna negotovost, saj je odločitev o potrebi po takem predhodnem preverjanju prepuščena pristojnemu organu.
In order to ensure legal certainty, professionals should know from the outset whether a prior check of professional qualifications is necessary and when a decision can be expected.
Da bi zagotovili pravno varnost, bi morali strokovnjaki že od začetka vedeti, ali je potrebno predhodno preverjanje poklicnih kvalifikacij in kdaj je glede tega mogoče pričakovati odločitev.
In any event, the conditions for such prior checks of professional qualifications under the free provision of services should not be more stringent than under the establishment rules.
Vsekakor pa pogoji za takšna predhodna preverjanja poklicnih kvalifikacij v okviru prostega izvajanja storitev ne bi smeli biti strožji kot v okviru pravil o ustanavljanju.
In the case of regulated professions that have public health or safety implications, Directive 2005/36/EC should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to impose an insurance cover obligation related to the professional acts in accordance with the rules applicable under Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare [9] and Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market [10].
V primeru reguliranih poklicev, ki vplivajo na javno zdravje ali varnost, Direktiva 2005/36/ES ne bi smela posegati v možnost držav članic, da uvedejo obveznost zavarovalnega kritja v zvezi s poklicnimi dejavnostmi v skladu z veljavnimi pravili na podlagi Direktive 2011/24/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2011 o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov pri čezmejnem zdravstvenem varstvu [9] in Direktivi 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu [10].
Vocational education and training systems have proved to be a useful tool for ensuring youth employment and enabling a smooth transition from training into working life.
Sistemi poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja so se izkazali kot koristno orodje, ki zagotavlja zaposlovanje mladih in omogoča gladek prehod iz izobraževanja v delo.
The review of Directive 2005/36/EC should therefore take their specificities fully into account.
Spremembe Direktive 2005/36/ES bi zato morale v celoti upoštevati njihove posebnosti.
In order to apply the mechanism of recognition under the general system, it is necessary to group the various national education and training schemes into different levels.
Da bi uporabili mehanizem priznavanja v okviru splošnega sistema, je treba različne nacionalne sheme izobraževanja in usposabljanja razvrstiti v različne stopnje.
Those levels, which are established only for the purpose of the operation of the general system, should have no effect on the national education and training structures or on the competence of Member States in that field, including national policy for implementing the European Qualifications Framework (EQF).
Te stopnje, vzpostavljene zgolj za namen delovanja splošnega sistema, ne bi smele imeti nobenega vpliva na nacionalne strukture izobraževanja in usposabljanja niti na pristojnosti držav članic na tem področju, vključno z nacionalno politiko za izvajanje evropskega ogrodja kvalifikacij.
The EQF is a tool designed to promote the transparency and comparability of professional qualifications and can be a useful additional source of information for the competent authorities examining professional qualifications issued in other Member States.
Evropsko ogrodje kvalifikacij je orodje za spodbujanje preglednosti in primerljivosti poklicnih kvalifikacij, lahko pa je tudi uporaben dodatni vir informacij za pristojne organe, ki preučujejo poklicne kvalifikacije, izdane v drugih državah članicah.
Following the Bologna process, higher education institutions have adapted the structure of their programmes to a two-cycle Bachelor’s and Master’s degree system.
Visokošolske ustanove so v skladu z Bolonjskim procesom prilagodile strukturo svojih programov, tako da so uvedle dvostopenjski diplomski in magistrski študij.
In order to ensure that the five levels outlined under Directive 2005/36/EC are consistent with this new degree structure, Bachelor’s degree should be classified under level d and Master’s degree under level e. The five levels established for the operation of the general system should in principle no longer be used as a criterion for excluding Union citizens from the scope of Directive 2005/36/EC when this would be contrary to the principle of lifelong learning.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti petih stopenj iz Direktive 2005/36/ES z novo strukturo študija bi bilo treba akademsko diplomo uvrstiti v stopnjo d, magisterij pa v stopnjo e. Pet stopenj, vzpostavljenih za delovanje splošnega sistema, se načeloma ne bi smelo več uporabljati kot merilo za izključitev državljanov Unije iz področja uporabe Direktive 2005/36/ES, kadar bi bilo to v nasprotju z načelom vseživljenjskega učenja.
Applications for recognition from professionals who come from non-regulating Member States and who have one year of professional experience should be treated in the same way as those of professionals who come from a regulating Member State.
Prošnje za priznanje s strani strokovnjakov, ki prihajajo iz držav članic, v katerih njihov poklic ni reguliran in ki imajo eno leto poklicnih izkušenj, bi bilo treba obravnavati enako kot prošnje strokovnjakov iz držav članic, v katerih je njihov poklic reguliran.
Their professional qualifications should be compared to the professional qualifications required in the host Member State on the basis of the professional qualification levels set out in Directive 2005/36/EC.
Njihove poklicne kvalifikacije bi bilo treba primerjati s poklicnimi kvalifikacijami, zahtevanimi v državi članici gostiteljici na podlagi ravni poklicnih kvalifikacij, ki jih določa Direktiva 2005/36/ES.
In the event of substantial differences, the competent authority should be able to impose compensation measures.
Če obstajajo večje razlike, bi moral imeti pristojni organ možnost uvesti dopolnilne ukrepe.
Any mechanisms for assessing theoretical knowledge and practical skills which might be required for access to the profession as compensation measures, should guarantee and comply with the principles of transparency and impartiality.
Mehanizmi za preverjanje teoretičnih znanj in praktičnih veščin, ki bi se lahko zahtevali kot dopolnilni ukrepi za dostop do poklica, bi morali zagotavljati načeli preglednosti in nepristranskosti in biti skladni z njima.
In the absence of harmonisation of the minimum training conditions for access to the professions governed by the general system, it should remain possible for the host Member State to impose a compensation measure.
Če minimalni pogoji glede usposobljenosti za dostop do poklicev, ki jih ureja splošni sistem, niso harmonizirani, bi bilo treba državam članicam gostiteljicam še naprej omogočati, da uvedejo dopolnilni ukrep.
Any such measure should be proportionate and, in particular, take account of the knowledge, skills and competences acquired by the applicant in the course of his professional experience or through lifelong learning, formally validated to that end by a relevant body.
Vsak tak ukrep bi moral biti sorazmeren ter zlasti upoštevati znanje, veščine in kompetence, ki jih je prosilec pridobil prek svojih poklicnih izkušenj ali vseživljenjskega učenja in ki jih je v ta namen uradno potrdil pristojni organ.
The decision imposing a compensation measure should be duly justified in order to enable the applicant to better understand his situation and to seek judicial review before national courts under Directive 2005/36/EC.
Da bi lahko prosilec bolje razumel svoj položaj in zahteval pravni pregled pred nacionalnimi sodišči na podlagi Direktive 2005/36/ES, bi morala biti odločitev glede uvedbe dopolnilnega ukrepa ustrezno utemeljena.
The review of Directive 2005/36/EC has shown a need to update and clarify with more flexibility the lists of industrial, commercial and craft activities in Annex IV, while maintaining a system of automatic recognition for those activities based on professional experience.
Pregled Direktive 2005/36/ES je pokazal potrebo po posodobitvi in prožnejšem pojasnilu seznamov industrijskih, trgovinskih in obrtnih dejavnosti iz Priloge IV, pri čemer bi bilo treba za navedene dejavnosti ohraniti sistem avtomatičnega priznavanja, ki temelji na poklicnih izkušnjah.
Annex IV is currently based on the International Standard Industrial Classification of all Economic Activities (ISIC) dated from 1958 and no longer reflects the current structure of economic activities.
Priloga IV v sedanji obliki temelji na Mednarodni klasifikaciji industrijskih standardov vseh gospodarskih dejavnosti (ISIC) iz leta 1958 in ne odraža več sedanje strukture gospodarskih dejavnosti.
The ISIC classification has been reviewed several times since 1958.
Klasifikacija ISIC je bila od leta 1958 že večkrat pregledana.
Therefore, the Commission should be able to adapt Annex IV in order to maintain intact the system of automatic recognition.
Zato bi Komisija morala imeti možnost prilagoditi Prilogo IV in tako ohraniti sistem avtomatičnega priznavanja.
Continuous professional development contributes to the safe and effective practice of professionals who benefit from the automatic recognition of their professional qualifications.
Stalno strokovno izpopolnjevanje prispeva k varnemu in učinkovitemu delu strokovnjakov, ki imajo koristi od avtomatičnega priznavanja njihovih poklicnih kvalifikacij.
It is important to encourage the further strengthening of continuous professional development for those professions.
Pomembno je spodbujati nadaljnjo krepitev stalnega strokovnega izpopolnjevanja za te poklice.
Member States should in particular encourage continuous professional development for doctors of medicine, medical specialists, general practitioners, nurses responsible for general care, dental practitioners, specialised dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons, midwives, pharmacists and architects.
Države članice bi morale zlasti spodbujati stalno strokovno izpopolnjevanje zdravnikov, zdravnikov specialistov, splošnih zdravnikov, medicinskih sester za splošno zdravstveno nego, zobozdravnikov, zobozdravnikov specialistov, veterinarjev, babic, farmacevtov in arhitektov.
The measures taken by Member States to promote continuous professional development for those professions should be communicated to the Commission, and Member States should exchange best practice in that area.
Države članice bi morale ukrepe, ki jih sprejmejo za spodbujanje stalnega strokovnega razvoja za te poklice, sporočiti Komisiji ter z drugimi državami članicami izmenjati dobre prakse na tem področju.
Continuous professional development should cover technical, scientific, regulatory and ethical developments and motivate professionals to participate in lifelong learning relevant to their profession.
Stalni strokovni razvoj bi moral zajemati področje tehnike, znanosti, regulative in etike ter naj bi spodbudilo strokovnjake k vseživljenjskemu učenju, ki je pomembno za njihov poklic.
The system of automatic recognition on the basis of harmonised minimum training requirements depends on the timely notification of new or changed evidence of formal qualifications by the Member States and their publication by the Commission.
Sistem avtomatičnega priznavanja na podlagi usklajenih minimalnih zahtev usposabljanja je odvisen od pravočasne priglasitve novih ali spremenjenih dokazil o formalnih kvalifikacijah s strani držav članic in njihove objave s strani Komisije.
Otherwise, holders of such qualifications have no guarantees that they can benefit from automatic recognition.
V nasprotnem primeru imetniki takih kvalifikacij nimajo nobenega jamstva, da lahko koristijo avtomatično priznavanje.
In order to increase transparency and facilitate the examination of newly notified titles, Member States should provide information about the duration and content of the training programmes, which need to be in compliance with the minimum training requirements laid down in Directive 2005/36/EC.
Da bi povečali preglednost in spodbudili pregled novo priglašenih nazivov, bi morale države članice zagotoviti informacije o trajanju in vsebini programov usposabljanja, ki morajo biti v skladu z minimalnimi zahtevami usposabljanja, določenih v Direktivi 2005/36/ES.
European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) credits are already used in a large majority of higher education institutions in the Union and their use is becoming more common also in courses leading to the qualifications required for the exercise of a regulated profession.
Kreditne točke evropskega sistema prenašanja in zbiranja kreditnih točk (ECTS) se že uporabljajo v veliki večini visokošolskih ustanov v Uniji, njihova uporaba pa postaja vedno pogostejša tudi pri programih za pridobitev kvalifikacij, potrebnih za izvajanje reguliranega poklica.
Therefore, it is necessary to introduce the possibility to express the duration of a programme also in ECTS.
Zato je treba uvesti možnost za izražanje trajanja programa tudi v kreditnih točkah ECTS.
That possibility should not affect the other requirements for automatic recognition.
Ta možnost ne bi smela vplivati na druge zahteve glede avtomatičnega priznavanja.
One ECTS credit corresponds to 25-30 hours of study whereas 60 credits are normally required for the completion of one academic year.
Ena kreditna točka ECTS ustreza 25–30 uram študija, za opravljeno akademsko leto pa se običajno zahteva 60 kreditnih točk.
In the interest of ensuring a high level of public health and patient safety within the Union and modernising Directive 2005/36/EC, it is necessary to modify the criteria used to define the basic medical training so that conditions relating to the minimum number of years and hours become cumulative.
V interesu zagotavljanja visoke ravni javnega zdravja in varnosti bolnikov v Uniji ter posodobitve Direktive 2005/36/ES je treba prilagoditi merila, ki se uporabljajo za opredelitev osnovnega usposabljanja zdravnikov, tako da bodo pogoji glede minimalnega števila let in ur postali kumulativni.
The objective of this modification is not to lower the training requirements for basic medical education.
Cilj te spremembe ni znižati zahtev glede osnovnega usposabljanja zdravnikov.
In the interest of enhancing the mobility of medical specialists who have already obtained a medical specialist qualification and afterwards follow another specialist training, Member States should be allowed to grant exemptions from some part of the training if such elements of the later training have already been completed during the former medical specialist training programme in a Member State.
Da bi povečali mobilnost zdravnikov specialistov, ki so že pridobili naziv zdravnika specialista in se nato udeležijo drugega specialističnega usposabljanja, bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da odobrijo odstopanja od delov usposabljanja, če so bili deli drugega usposabljanja že opravljeni med preteklim programom specialističnega usposabljanja v državi članici.
Member States should be allowed to grant, within certain boundaries, such exemptions for medical specialties which are covered by the automatic recognition system.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba dovoliti, da znotraj določenih okvirov dovolijo takšna odstopanja za zdravniške specializacije, ki so zajete v sistemu avtomatičnega priznavanja.
The nursing profession has significantly evolved in the last three decades: community-based healthcare, the use of more complex therapies and constantly developing technology presuppose a capacity for higher responsibilities for nurses.
Poklic medicinskih sester se je v zadnjih treh desetletjih precej razvil: zdravstvena oskrba na domu, uporaba kompleksnejših terapij in nenehen razvoj tehnologije terjajo zmožnost prevzemanja večje odgovornosti medicinskih sester.
Nurse training, the organisation of which still differs according to national traditions, should provide a more robust and more output-oriented assurance that the professional has acquired certain knowledge and skills during the training, and is able to apply at least certain competences in order to pursue the activities relevant to the profession.
Pri usposabljanju medicinskih sester, ki je zaradi nacionalnih tradicij še vedno različno organizirano, bi bila potrebna trdnejša in k rezultatom usmerjena zagotovila, da je medicinska sestra med usposabljanjem pridobila določena znanja in veščine ter da zna uporabiti vsaj določene kompetence za izvajanje dejavnosti, ki so pomembne za poklic.
In order to prepare midwives to meet complex healthcare needs relating to their activities, midwifery trainees should have a solid general education background before they start midwifery training.
Da bi se lažje pripravili na kompleksne zahteve zdravstvenega varstva, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati pri svojem delu, bi morali kandidati pred začetkom usposabljanja za poklic babice imeti dobro splošno izobrazbo.
Therefore, admission to midwifery training should be increased to 12 years of general education or successful examination of an equivalent level, except in the case of professionals who are already qualified as a nurse responsible for general care.
Zato bi bilo treba pogoje za sprejem v usposabljanje babic dvigniti na dvanajstletno splošno izobrazbo ali uspešno opravljeno preverjanje na enakovredni ravni, razen v primeru strokovnjakov, ki so že pridobili kvalifikacijo medicinske sestre za splošno nego.
Training of midwives should provide better assurance that the professional has acquired certain knowledge and skills necessary to pursue the activities of a midwife referred to in Directive 2005/36/EC.
Usposabljanje babic bi moralo dati boljša zagotovila, da je strokovnjak pridobil določena znanja in veščine, ki so potrebni za opravljanje dejavnosti babice v skladu z Direktivo 2005/36/ES.
To simplify the system for automatic recognition of medical and dental specialties, such specialties should be covered by Directive 2005/36/EC if they are common to at least two-fifths of the Member States.
Da bi poenostavili sistem avtomatičnega priznavanja zdravniških in zobozdravniških specializacij, bi morale biti take specializacije, če so skupne vsaj dvema petinama držav članic, zajete v Direktivi 2005/36/ES.
A significant number of Member States have decided to allow access to all activities in the field of pharmacy and the pursuit of these activities based on the recognition of qualifications of pharmacists acquired in another Member State since the entry into force of Directive 2005/36/EC.
Večje število držav članic se je odločilo dovoliti dostop do vseh dejavnosti na področju farmacije in opravljanje teh dejavnosti na podlagi priznanja kvalifikacij za farmacevte, pridobljene v drugi državi članici od začetka veljavnosti Direktive 2005/36/ES.
Such recognition of a professional qualification acquired in another Member State should not, however, prevent a Member State from maintaining non-discriminatory rules governing any geographical distribution of pharmacies on their territory because Directive 2005/36/EC does not coordinate such rules.
Takšno priznanje poklicne kvalifikacije, pridobljene v drugi državi članici, pa državi članici ne bi smelo preprečiti, da ohrani nediskriminatorna pravila, ki urejajo geografsko razporeditev lekarn na njenem ozemlju, ker Direktiva 2005/36/ES teh predpisov ne usklajuje.
However, any derogation from the automatic recognition of qualifications which is still necessary for a Member State should no longer exclude pharmacists who are already recognised by the Member State using such derogation and who have already been lawfully and effectively practising as a pharmacist for a certain period on the territory of that Member State.
Vsako odstopanje od avtomatičnega priznavanja kvalifikacij, ki je v določeni državi članici še vedno potrebno, ne bi več smelo izključiti farmacevtov, ki jih je država članica že priznala z uporabo tega odstopanja in ki že določeno obdobje zakonito in dejansko delajo kot farmacevti na ozemlju te države članice.
The functioning of the system of automatic recognition depends on confidence in the training conditions which underpin the qualifications of the professionals.
Delovanje sistema avtomatičnega priznavanja je odvisno od zaupanja v pogoje glede usposobljenosti, ki podpirajo kvalifikacije strokovnjakov.
Therefore, it is important that the minimum training conditions of architects reflect new developments in architectural education, in particular with respect to the recognised need to supplement academic training with professional experience under the supervision of qualified architects.
Zato je pomembno, da minimalni pogoji glede usposobljenosti arhitektov odražajo nov razvoj na področju izobraževanja arhitektov, zlasti glede priznane potrebe po dopolnjevanju akademskega usposabljanja s poklicnimi izkušnjami pod nadzorom kvalificiranih arhitektov.
At the same time, the minimum training conditions should be flexible enough to avoid unduly restricting the ability of Member States to organise their education systems.
Hkrati bi morali biti minimalni pogoji glede usposobljenosti dovolj prožni, da ne bi neupravičeno omejevali zmožnosti držav članic, da organizirajo svoje izobraževalne sisteme.
Directive 2005/36/EC should, through the introduction of common training principles, promote a more automatic character of recognition of professional qualifications for those professions which do not currently benefit from it.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES bi morala z uvedbo skupnih načel usposabljanja spodbujati bolj avtomatično priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij za tiste poklice, ki trenutno od tega nimajo koristi.
This should take account of the competence of Member States to decide the professional qualifications required for the pursuit of professions in their territory as well as the contents and the organisation of their systems of education and training.
Pri tem bi bilo treba upoštevati pristojnost držav članic, da določijo poklicne kvalifikacije, potrebne za opravljanje poklicev na njihovem ozemlju, ter vsebine in organizacijo njihovega sistema izobraževanja in usposabljanja.
Common training principles should take the form of common training frameworks based on a common set of knowledge, skills and competences or common training tests.
Skupna načela usposabljanja bi morala biti v obliki skupnih okvirov za usposabljanje, ki temeljijo na skupnem sklopu znanja, veščin in kompetenc ali standardiziranih preizkusih usposobljenosti.
It should be possible for common training frameworks also to cover specialties that currently do not benefit from automatic recognition provisions under Directive 2005/36/EC and that relate to professions encompassed by Chapter III of Title III and that have clearly defined specific activities reserved to them.
Za skupne okvire za usposabljanje bi moralo biti mogoče tudi, da zajemajo specializirana področja, ki trenutno nimajo koristi od določb o avtomatičnem priznavanju na podlagi Direktive 2005/36/ES in ki se nanašajo na poklice, ki jih pokriva poglavje III naslova III in ki so omejeni na jasno določene posebne dejavnosti.
Common training frameworks on such specialties, in particular medical specialties, should offer a high level of public health and patient safety.
Skupni okviri za usposabljanje za takšna specializirana področja, zlasti zdravniške specializacije, bi morali nuditi visoko raven javnega zdravja in varnosti bolnikov.