natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Urges the Network, as well as the individual agencies, to report to the discharge authority on the progress of the implementation of those ideas and approaches to assess whether a chosen approach has proved effective in resolving the outstanding issues identified by the Court of Auditors and pointed out in the Common Approach, and to report to the discharge authority on both the individual and collective actions taken to address the Court of Auditors’ findings, and the results thereof;
poziva mrežo in posamezne agencije, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poročajo o napredku pri uresničevanju teh zamisli in pristopov, da bo mogoče oceniti, ali se je izbrani pristop izkazal za učinkovitega pri reševanju preostalih težav, ki jih je opredelilo Računsko sodišče in so bile izpostavljene v skupnem pristopu, prav tako pa naj ga obveščajo o posameznih in skupnih ukrepih za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, na katere je opozorilo Računsko sodišče, ter o rezultatih, ki so jih pri tem dosegle;
Emphasises that the agencies have for some time been calling for greater flexibility in the rules applicable to them under the Financial Regulation;
poudarja, da agencije že nekaj časa zahtevajo večjo prilagodljivost pri določbah, ki veljajo zanje v okviru finančne uredbe;
recognises that most of those rules are disproportionate and ill-suited not only to the size and objectives of the majority of agencies, but also to their characteristics;
se zaveda, da je večina teh določb nesorazmernih in da niso prilagojene ne velikosti, ne ciljem, ne značilnostim velikega dela agencij;
considers that simplification of the financial and statutory rules applicable to the agencies would improve their efficiency, reduce their expenditure and solve many of the problems pointed out by the Court of Auditors;
meni, da bi poenostavitev finančnih in zakonskih določb, ki se uporabljajo za agencije, povečala njihovo učinkovitost, zmanjšala odhodke in odpravila mnoge težave, na katere opozarja Računsko sodišče;
Notes that some agencies in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice are operational ones and that the implementation of their budget also depends on external factors, which should be considered during the budgetary process;
ugotavlja, da so nekatere agencije na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice operativne in da je izvrševanje njihovega proračuna odvisno tudi od zunanjih dejavnikov, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati v proračunskem postopku;
Reiterates that the principle of annuality is one of the three basic accounting principles (unity, annuality and balance) indispensable to ensure an efficient implementation of the Union budget;
znova opozarja, da je načelo enoletnosti eno od treh temeljnih računovodskih načel (enotnost, enoletnost in uravnoteženost), ki so nujna za učinkovito izvrševanje proračuna Unije;
notes that decentralised agencies do not always fully comply with this principle;
ugotavlja, da decentralizirane agencije tega načela ne spoštujejo vedno v celoti;
Reminds the agencies that the persistent problem of carryovers has yet to be addressed;
opominja agencije, da ponavljajoči se problem prenosov v naslednje proračunsko leto še ni bil rešen;
takes note of the agencies’ explanations as regards the difficulty in avoiding carryovers in operational expenditure;
je seznanjen s pojasnili agencij, da se je prenosom odhodkov iz poslovanja v naslednje proračunsko leto težko izogniti;
believes, nevertheless, that in a number of cases there is room for improvement, in particular by means of a better management of commitment appropriations based on real needs, better internal planning and general revenue forecasting and more stringent budgetary discipline and regular overview of spending;
je vseeno prepričan, da bi bile v številnih primerih mogoče izboljšave, predvsem z boljšim upravljanjem sredstev za prevzem obveznosti na podlagi dejanskih potreb, boljšim notranjim načrtovanjem in splošnim napovedovanjem prihodkov, pa tudi s strožjo proračunsko disciplino in rednimi pregledi porabe;
calls on the agencies to assess their internal administrative procedures in order to reduce their administrative burden, in particular as regards public procurement and staff recruitment procedures;
poziva agencije, naj ocenijo notranje upravne postopke, da bi zmanjšale upravno breme, zlasti ko gre za postopke javnih naročil in zaposlovanja osebja;
believes that both the Commission and the Court of Auditors should provide effective assistance to the agencies in this area;
meni, da bi morala Komisija in Računsko sodišče na tem področju zagotavljati učinkovito pomoč agencijam;
Points out that in some cases the internal planning needs to be improved, which calls on the agencies to enhance their procedures;
opozarja, da bi bilo treba v nekaterih primerih izboljšati notranje načrtovanje, kar pomeni, da bi morale agencije izboljšati svoje postopke;
acknowledges at the same time that under certain circumstances and with due justification (e.g. settlements of payments have not been possible in the contracting year) this should be mentioned in a transparent way in the report of the Court of Auditors;
hkrati priznava, da bi moralo Računsko sodišče v določenih okoliščinah in s primerno utemeljitvijo (npr. izplačila niso bila mogoča v letu oddaje naročila) to na pregleden način omeniti v svojih poročilih;
is of the opinion that only so a true assessment can be made whether carryovers are too high or not;
meni, da bi bilo mogoče le tako dejansko oceniti, ali so prenosi previsoki ali ne;
Stresses, in this context, that the hierarchy of norms is to be taken into account, and believes that the focus should be put on sound financial management;
poudarja, da je treba pri tem upoštevati hierarhijo pravil, in meni, da bi se bilo treba osredotočiti na dobro finančno poslovodenje;
points out, however, that the current financial rules do not resolve the problem of agencies whose funding is based on charges, and calls on the Commission to propose a solution to this issue during the next revision of the financial rules applicable to the agencies;
meni pa, da sedanja finančna pravila ne odpravljajo težav agencij, katerih financiranje temelji na prispevkih, in poziva Komisijo, naj pri naslednji reviziji finančnih pravil, ki se uporabljajo za agencije, predlaga rešitev tega vprašanja;
points out that the Financial Regulation is not suited either to agencies which generate surpluses, and stresses that it is essential to consider, as part of the revision, ways of resolving this problem, e.g. by creating a limited reserve fund;
opozarja, da finančna uredba prav tako ni prilagojena agencijam, ki ustvarjajo presežke, zato je treba pri njeni reformi nujno razmisliti o rešitvah za takšne primere, denimo o ustanovitvi omejenega rezervnega sklada;
Expects the Court of Auditors, in its role as an external auditor as a follow-up to Parliament’s discharge report in 2010 and its report on the benchmarking of agencies, to consult the Network to compose an openly accessible and transparent benchmarking and ranking procedure for agencies by using important indicators in the fields of sound financial and budgetary management, low governance costs and efficient operational effectiveness, and to provide the underlying data in an easily accessible format (e.g. Excel files and/or CSV files);
pričakuje, da se bo Računsko sodišče v vlogi zunanjega revizorja v okviru spremljanja poročila Parlamenta o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2010 in lastnega poročila o primerjalni analizi agencij posvetovalo z mrežo agencij ter oblikovalo vsem dostopne in pregledne postopke za primerjavo in razvrščanje agencij z uporabo pomembnih kazalnikov na področju dobrega finančnega in proračunskega poslovodenja, nizkih upravnih stroškov ter operativne učinkovitosti in uspešnosti, podatke, ki jih bo pri tem uporabilo, pa posredovalo v lahko dostopni obliki (tj. Excelove datoteke in/ali datoteke CSV);
Notes with concern that the lack of flexibility within the budget has been recognised as a weakness by certain agencies, which suggests that savings could be made if there was enough flexibility within the budget from title to title;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je premajhna prilagodljivost v okviru proračuna po oceni nekaterih agencij slabost, kar pomeni, da bi bili mogoči prihranki, če bi bila proračunska prožnost pri prerazporejanju med posameznimi naslovi večja;
calls on the Commission to closely examine the situation and to come forth with proposals addressing this issue;
poziva Komisijo, naj pozorno preuči razmere in pripravi predloge za odpravo te pomanjkljivosti;
Notes that the agencies undergo numerous different audit and control procedures in the course of the year, which are often very unevenly distributed and may create difficulties to them;
ugotavlja, da v agencijah med letom potekajo številni različni revizijski in kontrolni postopki, vendar so pogosto zelo neenakomerno razporejeni in jim lahko povzročajo težave;
believes that that problem should be addressed primarily by better coordinating those various audits [8];
meni, da bi bilo treba to težavo v prvi vrsti nasloviti z boljšim usklajevanjem različnih revizij [8];
considers that the agencies should be consulted in order to find practical solutions for this issue without hampering the performance of their core tasks;
meni, da bi se bilo treba posvetovati z agencijami, da bi za to vprašanje poiskali praktične rešitve, ki ne bodo ovirale izvajanja njihovih osrednjih nalog;
invites the Court of Auditors, the Commission, the agencies and the Network to come up with an approach of this matter suitable for all involved parties;
poziva Računsko sodišče, Komisijo, agencije in mrežo, naj oblikujejo pristop, ki bo ustrezal vsem udeleženim stranem;
Demands that all agencies and joint undertakings systematically annex a standardised template regarding the publication of their final annual accounts which includes the data presented in their reports on the implementation of the budget and in their reports on the budgetary and financial management;
zahteva, da vse agencije in skupna podjetja ob objavi končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov vedno priložijo standardno predlogo s podatki, predstavljenimi v poročilih o izvrševanju proračuna ter v poročilih o proračunskem in finančnem poslovodenju;
recommends that all agencies and joint undertakings provide this information in a comprehensive, friendly accessible and transparent manner (e.g., Excel files and/or CSV files), in order to ease the comparison between their budgetary executions, and thus enabling Parliament and the public to comprehensively compare their expenses;
priporoča, da te podatke predložijo na celovit, preprosto dostopen in pregleden način (Excelove datoteke in/ali datoteke CSV), da bo primerjava med izvrševanjem njihovih proračunov preprostejša, Parlament in javnost pa bosta lahko podrobno primerjala njihove stroške;
Requests the Network to introduce a detailed, standardised budget line system so that an aggregation and comparison of the agencies revenues and expenses, as well as the implementation and use of appropriations for each budget line, can be compared by title, by chapter and by line;
poziva mrežo, naj uvede podroben, standardiziran sistem proračunskih vrstic, da bo mogoče združiti in primerjati prihodke in odhodke agencij, pa tudi izvrševanje in porabo sredstev po posameznih proračunskih vrsticah, in sicer po naslovih, poglavjih in postavkah;
furthermore, asks the Network to make the subsequent comparison and to ensure that the conclusions as well as the underlying data are freely available in an easily accessible format (e.g. Excel files and/or CSV files);
poleg tega jo poziva, naj podatke primerja in na njihovi osnovi oblikuje sklepe, nato pa te podatke da na voljo javnosti v lahko dostopni obliki (npr. Excelove datoteke in/ali datoteke CSV);
Human resources and recruitment policy
Človeški viri in politika zaposlovanja
Points out that the Staff Regulations establish the principles underlying the staff policy adopted by the agencies and that there is a need for greater flexibility and simplification of the statutory rules applicable to agencies in order to ensure that they function more effectively in this respect;
poudarja, da kadrovski predpisi vzpostavljajo načela kadrovske politike agencij in da obstaja potreba po večji prilagodljivosti in poenostavitvi zakonskih določb, ki se uporabljajo za agencije, da bi zagotovili večjo učinkovitost na tem področju;
points out furthermore that, although Article 110 of the Staff Regulations allows some flexibility, since the final decision rests with the Commission, it is vital that a previous agreement be reached between the agencies and the Commission;
prav tako poudarja, da člen 110 kadrovskih predpisov sicer omogoča določeno mero prilagodljivosti, saj končno odločitev sprejme Komisija, a je vseeno nujno, da Komisija in agencije pred tem dosežejo soglasje;
considers that, in the event of disagreement, the Commission should present a reasoned decision to Parliament’s committee responsible;
meni, da bi morala Komisija, če ne bo prišlo do soglasja, pristojnemu odboru Parlamenta posredovati utemeljeno odločitev;
Reminds the agencies that their staff policy planning should adopt a global programming approach to human resources which tallies with their budgetary and administrative capacities, in order to ensure that staff policy is cohesive and suited to their needs;
spominja agencije, da bi morale pri načrtovanju kadrovske politike ubrati pristop globalnega načrtovanja kadrovskih virov, ki bi bil v skladu z njihovimi proračunskimi in upravnimi zmogljivostmi, s čimer bi zagotovile, da bi bila njihova kadrovska politika enotna in prilagojena njihovim potrebam;
points out, furthermore, that staff plans should take into account certain basic considerations, such as gender and geographical balance;
poudarja tudi, da bi bilo treba v kadrovskih načrtih upoštevati nekatere temeljne pomisleke, kot sta enakopravna zastopanost spolov in geografska uravnoteženost;
welcomes, in this regard, the initiatives envisaged by the Commission in the Roadmap and the fact that the specific characteristics of the agencies are being acknowledged in the ongoing revision of the Staff Regulations;
v zvezi s tem pozdravlja pobude, ki jih je v časovnem načrtu podala Komisija, in dejstvo, da se pri reformi kadrovskih predpisov, ki poteka, upoštevajo posebne značilnosti agencij;
Expresses its concern at the fact that the procedures for recruiting staff to the agencies have posed a regular problem ever since the agencies were created, while the Court of Auditors in its audits concerning the financial year 2011 detected problems or weaknesses in this area in all but two of the agencies;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker v postopkih zaposlovanja v agencijah prihaja redno do težav že od njihove ustanovitve in ker je Računsko sodišče pri reviziji izvrševanja proračuna za leto 2011 naletelo na težave ali pomanjkljivosti na tem področju skoraj pri vseh agencijah, razen dveh;
is surprised that neither the Common Approach nor the Roadmap provide for any action in this area;
je začuden, da ne skupni pristop ne časovni načrt ne predvidevata ukrepov na tem področju;
Considers that the well-established practice of Staff Policy Plans is a valuable tool for long-term staff planning;
meni, da so že uveljavljeni načrti kadrovske politike koristno orodje za dolgoročno kadrovsko načrtovanje;
is increasingly concerned that the Commission annuls agreed Staff Policy Plans within the annual budget procedure and, therefore, calls on the Commission to restrict itself in this respect;
je vse bolj zaskrbljen, da bi utegnila Komisija v letnem proračunskem postopku razveljaviti dogovorjene načrte kadrovske politike, zato jo poziva, naj se pri tem omeji;
Calls on all agencies to inform the discharge authority of the number of days of leave authorised to each grade under the flexitime and compensatory leave schemes annually annexed to their annual activity reports;
poziva vse agencije, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvestijo, koliko dni dopusta na leto so odobrile posameznim razredom uslužbencev v shemah gibljivega delovnega časa in kompenzacije, ki jih priložijo svojih letnim poročilom o dejavnostih;
Conflicts of interest and transparency
Navzkrižja interesov in preglednost
Welcomes the Special Report No 15/2012 of the Court of Auditors on Management of Conflict of Interest in selected EU Agencies, which stems from Parliament’s request for the Court to undertake a comprehensive analysis of the agencies’ approach to the management of situations where there are potential conflicts of interest;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 15/2012 o obvladovanju navzkrižij interesov v izbranih agencijah EU, ki je nastalo na zahtevo Parlamenta, da je treba opraviti obsežno analizo pristopa agencij v primerih, ko bi lahko prišlo do navzkrižja interesov;
Considers that the main added value of Special Report No 15/2012 of the Court of Auditors lies in the regular monitoring of the agencies’ progress as regards management and prevention of conflicts of interest;
meni, da je glavna dodana vrednost posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča št. 15/2012 redno spremljanje napredka agencij pri obvladovanju in preprečevanju navzkrižja interesov;
calls on the Court to further follow-up this issue extending the scope of its audit to other agencies, and to present its findings in a future Special Report on the matter;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj še naprej spremlja zadevo ter razširi obseg revizije tudi na druge agencije, svoje ugotovitve o tem pa objavi v enem od naslednjih posebnih poročil;
Recalls that in its Special Report No 15/2012, the Court of Auditors has evaluated policies and procedures for the management of conflict of interest in four selected agencies:
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v posebnem poročilu št. 15/2012 ocenilo pravilnike in postopke za obravnavo navzkrižja interesov v štirih izbranih agencijah:
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA);
Evropski agenciji za varnost v letalstvu (EASA), Evropski agenciji za kemikalije (ECHA), Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (EFSA) in Evropski agenciji za zdravila (EMA);
Considers that the purpose of the Court of Auditors’ audit was to give an answer to two questions:
meni, da je skušalo Računsko sodišče odgovoriti na dve vprašanji:
firstly, were adequate policies and procedures in place, and secondly, were those policies and procedures adequately implemented;
prvič, ali so obstajali ustrezni pravilniki in postopki, in drugič, ali so bili ti pravilniki in postopki ustrezno upoštevani;
notes, furthermore, that the Court based its work on the definition of conflict of interest as provided for in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guidelines, and that the reference framework for minimum requirements adopted by the Court was also derived from those guidelines;
prav tako ugotavlja, da se je Računsko sodišče pri svojem delu oprlo na opredelitev navzkrižja interesov iz smernic Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) in da iz teh smernic izhaja tudi referenčni okvir za minimalne zahteve, ki ga je sprejelo Računsko sodišče;
stresses however that, although the OECD guidelines offer an international benchmark on this matter, they basically relate to conflicts of interests in the framework of public sector employees and cannot, therefore, provide an adequate basis for an effective response in the case of potential conflicts of interests among the governing bodies and other bodies involved in the agencies’ work, such as management boards and expert panels;
poudarja pa, da smernice OECD sicer ponujajo mednarodno primerjalno vrednost na tem področju, a se v osnovi zanašajo na navzkrižja interesov pri zaposlenih v javnem sektorju, zato ne morejo biti ustrezna podlaga za učinkovit odziv v primeru morebitnega navzkrižja interesov med upravnimi in drugimi organi, ki sodelujejo pri delu agencije, na primer upravnimi odbori in skupinami strokovnjakov;
nevertheless recognises the value of the OECD’s toolkit, and especially the checklist for gifts and benefits, etc., as well as the recommendations made concerning penalties, the need to check the completeness and content of statements of interests and the requirement to harness expertise and identify potential conflicts of interest;
se kljub vsemu zaveda vrednosti orodij OECD, zlasti kontrolnega seznama za darila in ugodnosti, pa tudi priporočil glede sankcij, nujnega preverjanja popolnosti in vsebine izjav o interesih ter zahteve za upoštevanje strokovnih mnenj in opredeljevanje morebitnih navzkrižij interesov;
Notes that conflicts of interest can also occur between members of the Management Board of an agency and the agency itself, due to national or institutional interests which may endanger the proper functioning of the agency;
ugotavlja, da lahko navzkrižje interesov zaradi nacionalnih ali institucionalnih interesov, ki lahko ogrožajo pravilno delovanje agencije, nastane tudi med člani upravnega odbora in agencijo samo;
therefore, calls on the Commission to urgently submit to Parliament a proposal to address this issue;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu obvezno posreduje predlog za obravnavo tega vprašanja;
expects that in the meantime the declarations of interests of each and every member of the management boards of the agencies will be made public, in the interests of transparency;
pričakuje, da se bodo medtem v interesu preglednosti objavile izjave o interesih vseh članov upravnih odborov agencij;
Regrets that, according to the findings of the Court of Auditors in its Special Report No 15/2012, at the time of completion of its field work (October 2011), none of the four selected agencies had adequately managed conflict of interest situations;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče v posebnem poročilu št. 15/2012, ko je bilo terensko delo končano (oktobra 2011), ugotovilo, da nobena od štirih izbranih agencij ni ustrezno obravnavala navzkrižja interesov;
notes that while EMA and EFSA had developed more advanced policies for managing conflict of interest, ECHA’s policies were incomplete and EASA did not have such policies in place;
ugotavlja še, da sta EMA in EFSA oblikovali boljša pravila za ukrepanje ob navzkrižju interesov, medtem ko so bila pravila ECHA nepopolna, EASA pa jih sploh ni uvedla;
Notes with concern that the Court of Auditors reported a number of shortcomings, in particular as regards the implementation of policies and procedures for staff and the board of appeal (ECHA), transparency as regards the publication of annual declarations of interest (EASA) and training on conflicts of interest (ECHA and EASA);
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče poročalo o številnih pomanjkljivostih, zlasti kar zadeva upoštevanje pravilnikov in postopkov za zaposlene in pritožbeni odbor (ECHA), preglednost pri objavljanju letnih izjav o interesih (EASA) in usposabljanje o navzkrižju interesov (ECHA in EASA);
stresses that, out of the four agencies audited by the Court, only EMA had a policy on gifts and invitations put in place;
poudarja, da ima med štirimi agencijami, za katere je Računsko sodišče opravilo revizijo, zgolj EMA pravilnik o darilih in povabilih;
Welcomes the recommendations made by the Court of Auditors to the four agencies audited;
pozdravlja priporočila, ki jih je Računsko sodišče podalo štirim revidiranim agencijam;
welcomes the fact that following the Court’ audits, the four selected agencies have taken a number of steps to address their individual deficiencies;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so izbrane agencije po reviziji Računskega sodišča sprejele številne ukrepe, da bi odpravile svoje pomanjkljivosti;
urges the agencies to report to the discharge authority on any further measures taken as regards the implementation of their policies and procedures to address those shortcomings, including as regards management of conflicts of interest;
poziva agencije, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poročajo o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi z uvajanjem pravilnikov in postopkov za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, pa tudi o morebitnih novostih pri upravljanju navzkrižja interesov;