natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the 2012/13 marketing year, the levy referred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 967/2006 shall not apply to the quantities issued of this certificate, subject to the respect of the rules laid down in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 629/2013, in particular in Article 2(5)(c).
Za tržno leto 2012/2013 se dajatev iz člena 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 967/2006 ne uporablja za količine, odobrene s tem dovoljenjem, pod pogojem, da se upoštevajo pravila iz Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 629/2013, zlasti člena 2(5)(c).
Signature of the competent authority of the Member State:
Podpis predstavnika pristojnega organa države članice:
Based on the estimated supply and demand for 2012/13, the ending stocks for the sugar market are expected to be lower by at least 500000 tonnes than in 2011/12.
Na podlagi ocenjene ponudbe in povpraševanja za leto 2012/2013 se pričakuje, da bodo končne zaloge na trgu sladkorja za najmanj 0,5 milijona tone nižje kot v letu 2011/2012.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 630/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 630/2013
amending the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
o spremembi prilog k Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 999/2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies [1], and in particular the first paragraph of Article 23 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 999/2001 z dne 22. maja 2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij [1], zlasti prvega odstavka člena 23 Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 lays down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) in bovine, ovine and caprine animals.
Uredba (ES) št. 999/2001 določa predpise za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij (TSE) pri govedu, ovcah in kozah.
On 19 January 2011, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published a joint opinion prepared with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) on any possible epidemiological or molecular association between TSEs in animals and humans (‘the joint EFSA and ECDC Opinion’) [2]. In the joint EFSA and ECDC opinion, the EFSA and ECDC confirmed the identification of atypical forms of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle and made the distinction between classical BSE, L-type atypical BSE and H-type atypical BSE.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA) je 19. januarja 2011 objavila skupno mnenje, pripravljeno v sodelovanju z Evropskim centrom za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni (ECDC), o kakršni koli morebitni epidemiološki ali molekularni povezavi med TSE pri živalih in ljudeh [2].
It is therefore appropriate to insert definitions for classical BSE cases and atypical BSE cases in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
EFSA in ECDC sta v skupnem mnenju potrdila identifikacijo atipičnih oblik goveje spongiformne encefalopatije (BSE) pri govedu, pri čemer sta razlikovala med klasično BSE, atipično BSE tipa L in atipično BSE tipa H. Zato je treba v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 dodati opredelitev klasičnih primerov BSE in atipičnih primerov BSE.
Part I of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 lays down rules for monitoring BSE in bovine animals slaughtered for human consumption.
Del I poglavja A Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določa pravila za spremljanje BSE pri govedu, zaklanem za prehrano za ljudi.
It refers to animals slaughtered in accordance with ‘special emergency slaughter’ as defined in Article 2(n) of Council Directive 64/433/EEC of 26 June 1964 on health conditions for the production and marketing of fresh meat [3].
Nanaša se na živali, zaklane v skladu s „posebnim zakolom v sili“, kot je opredeljen v členu 2(n) Direktive Sveta 64/433/EGS z dne 26. junija 1964 o zdravstvenih pogojih za proizvodnjo in trženje svežega mesa [3].
That Directive has since been repealed by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Ta direktiva je bila razveljavljena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/41/ES [4].
This has led to legal uncertainty and caused reduced testing in animals that should have been tested.
To je povzročilo pravno negotovost, hkrati pa se je zmanjšalo tudi testiranje živali, ki bi jih bilo treba testirati.
It is therefore necessary to clearly define emergency slaughter in the framework of the rules for monitoring BSE in bovine animals slaughtered for human consumption in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Zato je treba v Prilogi III k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 jasno opredeliti zakol v sili v okviru pravil za spremljanje BSE pri govedu, zaklanem za prehrano ljudi.
Part II of Chapter A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 lays down rules for monitoring in ovine and caprine animals.
V delu II poglavja A Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 so določena pravila za spremljanje pri ovcah in kozah.
The annual reports carried out by the Member States on the monitoring and testing of ruminants for the presence of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) in the Union have shown in recent years that the testing of ovine and caprine animals not slaughtered for human consumption is usually more efficient to identify cases of TSE than the testing of animals slaughtered for human consumption.
Letna poročila držav članic o spremljanju in testiranju prežvekovalcev na prisotnost transmisivne spongiformne encefalopatije (TSE) v Uniji so v zadnjih letih pokazala, da je mogoče s testiranjem ovac in koz, ki niso bile zaklane za prehrano ljudi, običajno učinkoviteje ugotoviti primere TSE kot s testiranjem živali, zaklanih za prehrano ljudi.
More flexibility should therefore be given to the Member States to focus a larger part of the limited number of tests required by that Annex in the subpopulations where there is a greater chance to identify such cases.
Torej bi bilo treba državam članicam zagotoviti večjo prožnost, da bodo lahko večji del omejenega števila testov, ki se zahtevajo na podlagi te priloge, namenile za podpopulacije, pri katerih obstaja večja verjetnost za ugotovitev takih primerov.
Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 lays down the eradication measures to be carried out following the confirmation of the presence of TSE in bovine, ovine and caprine animals and the minimum requirements for breeding programmes for resistance to TSEs in sheep.
Priloga VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določa ukrepe za izkoreninjenje, ki se izvajajo po potrditvi prisotnosti TSE pri govedu, ovcah in kozah, ter minimalne pogoje za rejske programe selekcije za odpornost proti TSE pri ovcah.
That Annex has been amended several times, including by Commission Regulations (EC) No 727/2007 [5] and (EC) No 746/2008 [6].
Ta priloga je bila večkrat spremenjena, med drugim z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 727/2007 [5] in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 746/2008 [6].
On 17 July 2007, in Case T-257/07, France brought an action against the Commission before the General Court, applying for the suspension of the operation of point (3) of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 727/2007 insofar as it introduces point 2.3(b)(iii), point 2.3(d) and point 4 into Chapter A of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, or alternatively the entire annulment of that Regulation.
Francija je 17. julija 2007 z zadevo T-257/07 pred Splošnim sodiščem sprožila postopek proti Komisiji, pri čemer je zahtevala odložitev uporabe točke 3 Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 727/2007 v delu, v katerem so z njo dodane točka 2.3(b)(iii), točka 2.3(d) in točka 4 v poglavje A Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, ali namesto tega razveljavitev celotne navedene uredbe.
According to France, those points would authorise less restrictive measures of surveillance and eradication than those earlier prescribed for sheep and goats.
Francija meni, da bi bili s temi točkami za ovce in koze dovoljeni ukrepi nadzora in izkoreninjenja, ki so manj omejujoči kot predhodno sprejeti ukrepi.
In its Order of 28 September 2007 [7], the Court suspended the application of those provisions until judgment would be given in the main action.
Sodišče je v sklepu z dne 28. septembra 2007 [7] zadržalo uporabo navedenih določb do razglasitve sodbe v postopku v glavni stvari.
The Commission subsequently asked the EFSA to assist it in clarifying the main premises on which Regulation (EC) No 727/2007 was based.
Zato je Komisija zaprosila EFSA, naj ji pomaga pojasniti osnovna načela, na katerih temelji Uredba (ES) št. 727/2007.
In view of the EFSA clarifications, Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 was amended by Regulation (EC) No 746/2008, which reinstated provisions the application of which had been suspended by the General Court.
Na podlagi pojasnil EFSA je bila Uredba (ES) št. 999/2001 spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 746/2008, ki je ponovno vzpostavila določbe, katerih uporaba je bila zadržana s sklepom Splošnega sodišča.
In its Order of 30 October 2008 [8], the General Court suspended the application of point 2.3(b)(iii), point 2.3(d) and point 4 of Chapter A of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 746/2008, until judgment would be given in the main action in Case T-257/07.
Splošno sodišče je v sklepu z dne 30. oktobra 2008 [8] zadržalo uporabo točke 2.3(b)(iii), točke 2.3(d) in točke 4 poglavja A Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 746/2008, do izreka sodbe v glavni stvari v zadevi T-257/07.
In its judgment of 9 September 2011 in Case T-257/07 [9], the General Court dismissed the application by France for the annulment of Regulation (EC) No 746/2008, and lifted the suspension of the application of those provisions of Chapter A of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Splošno sodišče je v sodbi z dne 9. septembra 2011 v zadevi T-257/07 [9] zavrnilo tožbo Francije za razveljavitev Uredbe (ES) št. 746/2008 in preklicalo zadržanje uporabe navedenih določb poglavja A Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
On 28 November 2011, in Case C-601/11 P [10], an appeal was brought by France against the judgment of the General court in Case T-257/07, requesting the Court to set aside the judgment of the General Court in Case T-257/07 and to give final judgment in the dispute by annulling Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 or to refer the case back to the General Court.
Francija je 28. novembra 2011 vložila pritožbo zoper sodbo Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-257/07 (zadeva C-601/11 P [10]), v kateri je Sodišču predlagala, naj razglasi ničnost sodbe Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-257/07 in naj o zadevi dokončno odloči z razglasitvijo ničnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 746/2008 ali naj zadevo v ponovno odločanje pošlje Splošnemu sodišču.
It is appropriate to clarify the very complex construct of management options and derogations for the control and eradication of classical scrapie in ovine and caprine animals set out in Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Treba je razjasniti zelo zapleten sistem v zvezi z možnostmi za nadzor ter odstopanji pri nadzoru in izkoreninjenju klasičnega praskavca pri ovcah in kozah na podlagi Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001.
Annex VII should only provide for three options in infected flocks or herds of ovine and caprine animals, namely: option 1 for the elimination of all animals; option 2 for the elimination of the susceptible animals only; and option 3 for no mandatory elimination of animals.
Priloga VII bi morala določati le tri možnosti v okuženih tropih ovac in koz, to je: prvič, odstranitev vseh živali, drugič, odstranitev samo dovzetnih živali in, tretjič, odstranitev živali ni obvezna.
The measures to be applied in each of those three options should be re-drafted in order to facilitate comparison between the options and improve awareness of the consequences for the individual holding.
Treba bi bilo znova opredeliti ukrepe, ki jih je treba uporabiti za vsako od navedenih možnosti, da bi tako poenostavili primerjavo med njimi in pripomogli k večji ozaveščenosti o posledicah za posamezno gospodarstvo.
As option 1 and option 2 include stringent eradication measures which improve disease control, the post-eradication measures enforced under option 1 and option 2 should be more flexible than under option 3.
Ker prva in druga možnost vključujeta stroge ukrepe za izkoreninjenje, s katerimi se izboljšuje nadzor nad boleznijo, bi morali biti ukrepi, določeni v zvezi s tema možnostma za obdobje po izkoreninjenju, prožnejši kot v zvezi s tretjo možnostjo.
It is necessary to clarify the conditions under which the elimination measures set out in option 2 may be delayed.
Treba je pojasniti pogoje, pod katerimi je mogoče ukrepe odstranitve, določene v drugi možnosti, odložiti.
It is appropriate to allow for a short term delay not exceeding three months linked to lambing season considerations.
Treba je dopustiti kratkoročni odlog, ki ne sme biti daljši od treh mesecev, iz razlogov, povezanih z jagnjitveno sezono.
However, a long term delay can only be justified by the need of additional time to increase the level of genetic resistance to classical scrapie in a holding.
Po drugi strani je mogoče dolgoročni odlog utemeljiti le s potrebo po dodatnem času za zvišanje ravni genske odpornosti proti klasičnemu praskavcu na gospodarstvu.
Since genetic resistance to classical scrapie has so far been proven only in ovine animals, the long term delay should not be permitted for herds comprising only caprine animals.
Ker je bila doslej genska odpornost proti klasičnemu praskavcu dokazana le pri ovcah, ne bi smeli dovoliti dolgoročnega odloga za trope, sestavljene le iz koz.
When permitted, it should be limited to a period of three years under certain conditions.
Če se odlog dovoli, bi ga bilo treba pod nekaterimi pogoji omejiti na triletno obdobje.
Where classical scrapie is confirmed in holdings keeping a local ovine breed in danger of being lost to farming, the post-eradication measures laid down in Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should take into consideration the difficulty of introducing and using only resistant ovine animals or ovine germinal products of the same endangered breed.
Če je klasični praskavec potrjen na gospodarstvih, na katerih vzrejajo lokalno pasmo ovac, ki je v nevarnosti, da se preneha rediti, bi bilo treba z ukrepi, ki so v Prilogi VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določeni za obdobje po izkoreninjenju, upoštevati, da bo težko vnesti in uporabljati le odporne ovce ali odporna zarodna tkiva ovac iste ogrožene pasme.
In this particular case, Member States should be permitted to apply more flexible rules regarding the genotype of breeders and germinal products introduced and used in the holdings.
V tem posebnem primeru bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti uporabo prožnejših pravil v zvezi z genotipom plemenskih živali in zarodnimi tkivi, ki se vnesejo na gospodarstva in uporabljajo na njih.
The joint EFSA and ECDC Opinion suggests that atypical scrapie could be little or not contagious at all.
EFSA in ECDC sta v skupnem mnenju ugotovila, da je lahko atipični praskavec malo nalezljiv ali sploh ni nalezljiv.
That finding mainly relies on the lack of statistical difference of the observed Atypical/Nor98 frequencies between the general population and the flocks where a positive case had been identified.
Ta ugotovitev temelji zlasti na dejstvu, da ni statistično pomembne razlike v pogostosti pojavljanja atipičnega praskavca (NOR 98), ugotovljeni v splošni populaciji, in pogostosti pojavljanja v tropih, v katerih je bil odkrit pozitiven primer.
Therefore, restriction measures on the movement of ovine and caprine animals where a case of atypical scrapie has been confirmed are no longer justified.
Torej niso več utemeljeni ukrepi za omejitev gibanja ovac in koz, če je bil potrjen primer atipičnega praskavca.
Increased surveillance in those flocks or herds should, however, be maintained in order to gather more scientific data on atypical scrapie.
Vendar bi bilo treba kljub temu ohraniti poostren nadzor nad takimi tropi, da bi tako zbrali več znanstvenih podatkov o atipičnem praskavcu.
This amendment to Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 is in line with the future policy options envisaged by paragraph 2.4.3 of the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — The TSE Road map 2 — A Strategy paper on Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies for 2010-2015 [11].
Ta sprememba Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 se sklada s prihodnjimi možnostmi politike iz odstavka 2.4.3 Sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom Drugi časovni načrt za TSE – Strateški dokument o transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatijah za obdobje 2010–2015 [11].
The participation in breeding programmes has been so far limited to ovine flocks of high genetic merit.
Sodelovanje v rejskih programih je bilo doslej omejeno na trope ovac z visoko gensko vrednostjo.
Where they have been applied, the breeding programmes have been effective in increasing the resistance to classical scrapie in the high genetic merit sheep population.
Kjer so se rejski programi uporabljali, so bili učinkoviti pri povečevanju odpornosti proti klasičnemu praskavcu v populaciji ovac z visoko gensko vrednostjo.
But the diffusion in the ordinary production population of the hereditary factor (allele) carrying the resistance appears to have been limited so far.
Vendar je bilo doslej razširjanje dednega dejavnika (alela), od katerega je odvisna odpornost v običajni produktivni populaciji omejeno.
Chapter C of Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should allow the genotyping of the breeding rams of flocks not participating in the breeding programme in order to facilitate a broader diffusion of the resistance factor to classical scrapie in the production population.
Določbe poglavja C Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 bi morale omogočati genotipizacijo plemenskih ovnov iz tropov, ki niso vključene v rejski program, da bi tako olajšali večje razširjanje dejavnika, od katerega je odvisna odpornost proti klasičnemu praskavcu v produktivni populaciji.
Chapter A of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 lays down rules governing intra-Union trade in live animals, semen and embryos.
Poglavje A Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določa pravila za trgovino z živimi živalmi, semenom in zarodki med državami članicami Unije.
As referred to in recital 14, the joint EFSA and ECDC Opinion suggests that atypical scrapie could be little or not contagious at all.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14, sta EFSA in ECDC v skupnem mnenju ugotovila, da je lahko atipični praskavec malo nalezljiv ali sploh ni nalezljiv.
The lifting of all restriction measures on the movement of ovine and caprine animals where a case of atypical scrapie has been confirmed should therefore apply to intra-Union trade.
Torej bi bilo treba preklicati vse ukrepe za omejitev gibanja ovac in koz v primeru potrditve primera atipičnega praskavca, ki se uporabljajo za trgovino med državami članicami Unije.
This position is also supported by the fact that the Terrestrial Animal Health Code, as voted in 2010 at the 78th General Session of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), does not recommend any trade restriction with regards to atypical scrapie.
Tako stališče je mogoče podpreti tudi z dejstvom, da Zoosanitarni kodeks za kopenske živali, izglasovan leta 2010 na 78. generalnem zasedanju Mednarodne organizacije za zdravje živali (OIE), ne vključuje priporočila o omejitvi trgovine zaradi atipičnega praskavca.
The rules set out in Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 relating to intra-Union trade in ovine and caprine animals and their semen and embryos should be made as consistent as possible with the OIE standards, so that they do not preclude Member States with an approved national control programme for classical scrapie from claiming the country freedom status for classical scrapie according to the conditions laid out in the OIE code.
Pravila iz Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 v zvezi s trgovino z ovcami in kozami ter njihovim semenom in zarodki med državami članicami Unije bi morala biti kar najbolj usklajena s standardi OIE, da ne bi državam članicam z odobrenim nacionalnim programom nadzora klasičnega praskavca preprečili, da v zvezi s to boleznijo zaprosijo za status države, „proste bolezni“, v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v kodeksu OIE.
The amended intra-Union trade provisions should however not adversely impact existing intra-Union trade flows among Member States where no national control programme for classical scrapie has been approved.
Vendar spremenjene določbe v zvezi s trgovino med državami članicami Unije ne bi smele škodljivo vplivati na obstoječe trgovinske tokove med državami članicami, v katerih nacionalni program nadzora klasičnega praskavca ni bil odobren.
For that purpose, and as proposed in paragraph 2.4.3 of the TSE Roadmap 2, a framework enabling the Member States to establish an official scheme for the recognition of classical scrapie status in holdings should be set out in Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Kot je bilo priporočeno v odstavku 2.4.3 drugega časovnega načrta za TSE, bi bilo treba zato v Prilogi VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 določiti okvir, ki bi državam članicam omogočil vzpostavitev uradnega programa za priznanje statusa glede klasičnega praskavca na gospodarstvih.
The possibility for a holding to engage in intra-Union trade of ovine and caprine animals, with regards to classical scrapie, should be determined by its classical scrapie status.
Možnost gospodarstva, da se vključi v trgovino z ovcami in kozami med državami članicami Unije, kar zadeva klasični praskavec, bi bilo treba opredeliti na podlagi njegovega statusa v zvezi s to boleznijo.
A two tiered system for classical scrapie status in holdings should be established in Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
V Prilogi VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 bi bilo treba vzpostaviti dvostopenjski sistem v zvezi s statusom glede klasičnega praskavca na gospodarstvih.
A negligible risk status, equivalent in technical terms to the scrapie free status in a holding, as laid down in Article 14.9.5. of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health code and based on compliance with the full list of the OIE requirements for at least seven years (in line with the rule laid down in article 6a and Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 favouring the development of the resistant genotypes in ovines, the proposal however recognises the ARR/ARR genotype as a valid option), should be required for transporting animals for breeding and rearing to the Member States with an approved national control programme for classical scrapie.
Za prevoz plemenskih živali in gojenje v državo članico z odobrenim nacionalnim programom nadzora klasičnega praskavca bi bilo treba zahtevati status zanemarljivega tveganja, ki se s tehničnega vidika ujema s statusom prosto praskavca na gospodarstvu, kot je ta določen v členu 14.9.5 Zoosanitarnega kodeksa za kopenske živali OIE in na podlagi vsaj sedemletne skladnosti s celotnim seznamom zahtev OIE (v predlogu se v skladu s pravilom iz člena 6a in Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 za spodbuditev razvoja odpornih genotipov pri ovcah kot relevantna možnost kljub temu priznava tudi genotip ARR/ARR).
Animals for breeding intended to other Member States should only be required to come from holdings with a controlled risk of classical scrapie based on compliance with a shorter list of requirements for at least three years, as is presently the case.
Za plemenske živali, namenjene v druge države članice, bi bilo treba tako kot doslej zahtevati le, da prihajajo z gospodarstev z nadzorovanim tveganjem za klasični praskavec na podlagi vsaj triletne skladnosti s krajšim seznamom zahtev.