natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC Austria received on 3 September 2009 an application from Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe SAS for the inclusion of the active substance fenpyrazamine in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Avstrija 3. septembra 2009 prejela zahtevek podjetja Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe SAS za vključitev aktivne snovi fenpirazamin v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2010/150/EU confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
S Sklepom 2010/150/EU je bilo potrjeno, da je dokumentacija „popolna“ v smislu načelnega izpolnjevanja zahtev po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 17 January 2011.
Država članica poročevalka je 17. januarja 2011 predložila osnutek poročila o oceni.
The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fenpyrazamine [4] on 6 December 2011.
Agencija je 6. decembra 2011 Komisiji predložila sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov za aktivno snov fenpirazamin [4].
This draft assessment report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and was finalised on 1 June 2012 in the format of the Commission review report for fenpyrazamine.
Osnutek poročila o oceni so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 1. junija 2012 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu fenpirazamina.
It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing fenpyrazamine may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) and Article 5(3) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
Različne preiskave so pokazale, da se za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo fenpirazamin, lahko pričakuje, da na splošno izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) ter 5(3) Direktive 91/414/EGS, zlasti v zvezi z uporabami, ki so bile preučene in podrobno navedene v poročilu Komisije o pregledu.
It is therefore appropriate to approve fenpyrazamine.
Zato je primerno, da se fenpirazamin odobri.
Without prejudice to the obligations provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 as a consequence of approval, taking into account the specific situation created by the transition from Directive 91/414/EEC to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the following should, however, apply.
Brez poseganja v obveznosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, ki izhajajo iz odobritve, in ob upoštevanju posebnega položaja, ki je nastal s prehodom od Direktive 91/414/EGS k Uredbi (ES) št. 1107/2009, bi bilo treba upoštevati naslednje.
Member States should be allowed a period of six months after approval to review authorisations of plant protection products containing fenpyrazamine.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba po odobritvi omogočiti šestmesečno obdobje, da pregledajo registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo fenpirazamin.
The active substance fenpyrazamine, as specified in Annex I, is approved subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Aktivna snov fenpirazamin, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi I, je odobrena v skladu s pogoji iz navedene priloge.
Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing fenpyrazamine as an active substance by 30 June 2013.
Države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 do 30. junija 2013 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo veljavne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo fenpirazamin kot aktivno snov.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing fenpyrazamine as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances, all of which were listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 by 31 December 2012 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC and taking into account the column on specific provisions of Annex I to this Regulation.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice znova ocenijo vsako registrirano fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje fenpirazamin kot edino aktivno snov ali kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, vključenih v Prilogo k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 najpozneje do 31. decembra 2012, po enotnih načelih iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, na podlagi dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, in ob upoštevanju stolpca o posebnih določbah iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
in the case of a product containing fenpyrazamine as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 30 June 2014 at the latest; or
če sredstvo vsebuje fenpirazamin kot edino aktivno snov, najpozneje do 30. junija 2014 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo registracijo ali
in the case of a product containing fenpyrazamine as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 30 June 2014 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective act or acts which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC or approved that substance or substances, whichever is the latest.
če sredstvo vsebuje fenpirazamin kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, registracijo po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo najpozneje do 30. junija 2014 ali do datuma, določenega za tako spremembo ali preklic v ustreznih aktih, s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi dodane v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS oziroma s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi odobrene, pri čemer se upošteva poznejši datum.
OJ L 61, 11.3.2010, p. 35.
UL L 61, 11.3.2010, str. 35.
EFSA Journal (2012) 10(1):2496.
EFSA Journal (2012) 10(1): 2496.
CAS No 473798-59-3
št. CAS 473798-59-3
CIPAC No 832
št. CIPAC 832
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on fenpyrazamine, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 1 June 2012 shall be taken into account.
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu fenpirazamina ter zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali pripravil 1. junija 2012.
For fenpyrazamine the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2010/150/EU [3].
Sklep Komisije 2010/150/ES [3] je potrdil, da fenpirazamin izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 80(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1107/2009.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 596/2012
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 596/2012
initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 on imports of silicon originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of silicon consigned from Taiwan whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not, and making such imports subject to registration
o začetku preiskave glede možnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 467/2010 na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske pri uvozu silicija, poslanega s Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom s Tajvana ali ne, in o registraciji takega uvoza
The European Commission ('the Commission') has received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of silicon originating in the People's Republic of China and to make imports of silicon consigned from Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not, subject to registration.
(1) Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, da razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ter da uvede registracijo uvoza silicija, poslanega s Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom s Tajvana ali ne.
The request was lodged on 15 May 2012 by Euroalliages (Liaison Committee of the Ferro-Alloy Industry) ('the applicant') on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, namely 100 %, of the Union production of silicon.
Zahtevek je 15. maja 2012 vložil Euroalliages (Liaison Committee of the Ferro-Alloy Industry) („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru 100 %, proizvodnje silicija v Uniji.
The product concerned by the possible circumvention is silicon metal originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN code 28046900 (silicon content less than 99,99 % by weight) (‘the product concerned’).
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva morebitno izogibanje, je silicijeva kovina s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN 28046900 (vsebuje manj kot 99,99 mas. % silicija) („zadevni izdelek“).
Purely by reason of the current classification set out in the Combined Nomenclature, it should read ‘silicon’.
Samo zaradi sedanje razvrstitve v kombinirani nomenklaturi se izdelek glasi „silicij“.
Silicon with a higher purity, that is containing by weight not less than 99,99 % of silicon, used mostly in the electronic semi-conductor industry, falls under a different CN code and is not covered by this proceeding.
Silicij večje čistosti, ki vsebuje najmanj 99,99 mas. % silicija in se večinoma uporablja v elektronski industriji polprevodnikov, se uvršča pod drugo oznako KN in ni zajet v tem postopku.
The product under investigation is the same as that defined in the previous recital, but consigned from Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not, currently falling within the same CN code as the product concerned (‘the product under investigation’).
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak izdelku, opredeljenemu v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, le da je poslan s Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom s Tajvana ali ne, ki se trenutno uvršča pod isto oznako KN kot zadevni izdelek („izdelek v preiskavi“).
The measures currently in force and possibly being circumvented are anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 [2] imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China, as extended to imports of silicon consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) and a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.
Trenutno veljavni ukrepi, katerim se domnevno izogiba, so protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 467/2010 [2] o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz silicija, poslanega iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne, na osnovi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa na podlagi člena 11(2) in delnega vmesnega pregleda na podlagi člena 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009.
An anti-circumvention investigation concerning imports of silicon was also carried out in 2006-2007 which led to Council Regulation (EC) No 42/2007 [3] extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of silicon consigned from the Republic of Korea whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not.
Preiskava proti izogibanju v zvezi z uvozom silicija je bila opravljena tudi v obdobju 2006–2007, ki je privedla do Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 42/2007 [3] o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 398/2004 na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz silicija, poslanega iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne.
The request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the anti-dumping measures on imports of silicon originating in the People's Republic of China are being circumvented by means of transhipment via Taiwan.
Zahtevek vsebuje zadostne dokaze prima facie, da se protidampinškim ukrepom za uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske izogiba s pretovarjanjem prek Tajvana.
The prima facie evidence at the Commission's disposal is as follows:
Dokazi prima facie, ki jih ima Komisija na voljo, so naslednji.
There is a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the People's Republic of China and Taiwan to the Union which has taken place following the imposition of measures on the product concerned, without sufficient due cause or justification for such a change other than the imposition of the duty.
Po uvedbi ukrepov za zadevni izdelek se je znatno spremenila struktura trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana v Unijo, za takšno spremembo pa razen uvedbe dajatve ni dovolj ustreznih vzrokov ali utemeljitev.
This change appears to stem from the transhipment of silicon originating in the People's Republic of China via Taiwan to the Union.
Zdi se, da je ta sprememba posledica pretovarjanja silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske prek Tajvana v Unijo.
Should circumvention practices via Taiwan covered by Article 13 of the basic Regulation, other than transhipment, be identified in the course of the investigation, the investigation may also cover these practices.
Če se med preiskavo razen pretovarjanja ugotovijo prakse izogibanja prek Tajvana, zajete v členu 13 osnovne uredbe, se lahko v preiskavo vključijo tudi te.
In light of the above, the Commission has concluded that sufficient evidence exists to justify the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation and to make imports of the product under investigation, whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not, subject to registration, in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, ki upravičujejo začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe ter registracijo uvoza izdelka v preiskavi v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom s Tajvana ali ne.
In order to obtain the information it deems necessary for its investigation, the Commission will send questionnaires to the known exporters/producers and to the known associations of exporters/producers in Taiwan, to the known exporters/producers and to the known associations of exporters/producers in the People's Republic of China, to the known importers and to the known associations of importers in the Union and to the authorities of the People's Republic of China and Taiwan.
Za pridobitev informacij, ki so po mnenju Komisije potrebne za preiskavo, bo Komisija poslala vprašalnike znanim izvoznikom/proizvajalcem in znanim združenjem izvoznikov/proizvajalcev na Tajvanu, znanim izvoznikom/proizvajalcem in znanim združenjem izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, znanim uvoznikom in znanim združenjem uvoznikov v Uniji ter organom Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana.
The authorities of the People's Republic of China and Taiwan will be notified of the initiation of the investigation.
Organi Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana bodo o začetku preiskave uradno obveščeni.
Since the possible circumvention takes place outside the Union, exemptions may be granted, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, to producers of silicon in Taiwan that can show that they are not related [4] to any producer subject to the measures [5] and that are found not to be engaged in circumvention practices as defined in Articles 13(1) and 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Ker do možnega izogibanja prihaja zunaj Unije, se v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe lahko odobri izvzetje proizvajalcem silicija s Tajvana, ki lahko dokažejo, da niso povezani [4] z nobenim proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi [5], in za katere se ugotovi, da niso vpleteni v izogibanje, kakor je opredeljeno v členih 13(1) in 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product under investigation should be made subject to registration in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings of circumvention, anti-dumping duties of an appropriate amount can be levied from the date on which registration of such imports consigned from Taiwan was imposed.
Če bi preiskava pokazala izogibanje, bi morala v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe za uvoz izdelka v preiskavi veljati registracija, da bi se lahko zagotovilo zaračunavanje protidampinških dajatev v ustreznem znesku od datuma registracije takega uvoza, poslanega s Tajvana.
interested parties may make themselves known to the Commission, present their views in writing and submit questionnaire replies or any other information to be taken into account during the investigation,
se lahko zainteresirane strani javijo Komisiji, pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in predložijo izpolnjene vprašalnike ali kakršne koli druge informacije, ki jih je treba upoštevati med preiskavo;
producers in Taiwan may request exemption from registration of imports or measures,
proizvajalci na Tajvanu lahko zahtevajo izvzetje uvoza iz registracije ali ukrepov;
Attention is drawn to the fact that the exercise of most procedural rights set out in the basic Regulation depends on the party's making itself known within the time-limits indicated in Article 3 of this Regulation.
Opozoriti je treba na dejstvo, da je uveljavljanje večine procesnih pravic, določenih v osnovni uredbi, odvisno od tega, ali se stranka javi v roku iz člena 3 te uredbe.
In cases in which any interested party refuses access to or does not provide the necessary information within the time-limits, or significantly impedes the investigation, findings, affirmative or negative, may be made in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the facts available.
Če katera koli zainteresirana stran zavrne dostop do potrebnih informacij, jih ne predloži v predpisanih rokih ali znatno ovira preiskavo, se lahko v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev sprejmejo pozitivne ali negativne ugotovitve.
Where it is found that any interested party has supplied false or misleading information, the information shall be disregarded and use may be made of facts available.
Če se ugotovi, da je katera koli zainteresirana stran predložila napačne ali zavajajoče informacije, se te morda ne bodo upoštevale, uporabijo pa se lahko razpoložljiva dejstva.
The investigation will be concluded, pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation, within nine months of the date of the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Preiskava se v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe zaključi v devetih mesecih po objavi te uredbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Interested parties may request the intervention of the Hearing Officer of the Directorate-General for Trade.
Zainteresirane strani lahko zahtevajo posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje iz GD Trade.
The Hearing Officer reviews requests for access to the file, disputes regarding the confidentiality of documents, requests for extension of time limits and requests by third parties to be heard.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje obravnava zahtevke za dostop do dokumentacije, nestrinjanja z zaupnostjo podatkov, zahtevke za podaljšanje rokov in zahtevke tretjih oseb za zaslišanje.
The Hearing Officer will also provide opportunities for a hearing involving parties to take place which would allow different views to be presented and rebuttal arguments offered.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ravno tako omogoči vpletenim stranem, da med zaslišanjem predstavijo različna stališča in nasprotne argumente.
For further information and contact details interested parties may consult the Hearing Officer's web pages on the Directorate-General for Trade's website: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/tackling-unfair-trade/hearing-officer/index_en.htm.
Dodatne informacije in kontaktni podatki so zainteresiranim stranem na voljo na spletnih straneh pooblaščenca za zaslišanje na spletišču GD Trade: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/tackling-unfair-trade/hearing-officer/index_en.htm –
An investigation is hereby initiated pursuant to Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, in order to determine if imports into the Union of silicon (silicon content less than 99,99 % by weight) consigned from Taiwan whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not, currently falling within CN code ex28046900 (TARIC code 2804690020), are circumventing the measures imposed by Regulation (EU) No 467/2010.
V skladu s členom 13(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 se začne preiskava, da se ugotovi, ali se z uvozom silicija v Unijo (vsebuje manj kot 99,99 mas. % silicija), poslanega s Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom s Tajvana ali ne, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex28046900 (oznaka TARIC 2804690020), izogiba ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo (EU) št. 467/2010.
The Customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 13(3) and Article 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union identified in Article 1 of this Regulation.
Carinskim organom se v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 odredi, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza iz člena 1 te uredbe v Unijo.
Producers in Taiwan requesting exemption from registration of imports or measures must submit a request duly supported by evidence within the same 37-day time-limit.
Proizvajalci na Tajvanu, ki zahtevajo izvzetje uvoza iz registracije ali ukrepov, morajo predložiti zahtevo, ustrezno podprto z dokazi, v istem 37-dnevnem roku.
Interested parties are required to make all submissions and requests in electronic format (non-confidential submissions via e-mail, confidential ones on CD-R/DVD), and must indicate the name, address, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.
Zainteresirane strani morajo svoja stališča in zahtevke predložiti v elektronski obliki (nezaupno dokumentacijo po elektronski pošti, zaupno na CD-R/DVD) ter pri tem navesti ime, naslov, elektronski naslov ter telefonsko številko in številko telefaksa.
However, any Powers of Attorney, signed certifications, and any updates thereof, accompanying questionnaire replies must be submitted on paper, i.e. by post or by hand, at the address below.
Vsa pooblastila, podpisana potrdila in kakršne koli dopolnitve teh dokumentov, priložene izpolnjenim vprašalnikom, pa morajo biti predložene v papirni obliki, tj. po pošti ali osebno, na spodnji naslov.
For further information concerning correspondence with the Commission, interested parties may consult the relevant web page on the website of the Directorate-General for Trade: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/tackling-unfair-trade/trade-defence.
Dodatne informacije o korespondenci s Komisijo so zainteresiranim stranem na voljo na zadevnem spletišču GD za trgovino: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/tackling-unfair-trade/trade-defence.