natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the appeal or cross-appeal is, in whole or in part, manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded, the Court may at any time, acting on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, decide by reasoned order to dismiss that appeal or cross-appeal in whole or in part.
Če je glavna ali nasprotna pritožba v celoti ali deloma očitno nedopustna ali očitno neutemeljena, lahko Sodišče na predlog sodnika poročevalca in po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca kadar koli z obrazloženim sklepom pritožbo v celoti ali deloma zavrže ali zavrne.
Manifestly well-founded appeal or cross-appeal
Očitno utemeljena pritožba
Where the Court has already ruled on one or more questions of law identical to those raised by the pleas in law of the appeal or cross-appeal and considers the appeal or cross-appeal to be manifestly well founded, it may, acting on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the parties and the Advocate General, decide by reasoned order in which reference is made to the relevant case-law to declare the appeal or cross-appeal manifestly well founded.
Če je Sodišče že odločalo o enem ali več pravnih vprašanjih, ki so enaka tem, ki se zastavljajo z razlogi iz glavne ali nasprotne pritožbe, in če meni, da je pritožba očitno utemeljena, lahko na predlog sodnika poročevalca ter po opredelitvi strank in generalnega pravobranilca z obrazloženim sklepom, v katerem je navedena upoštevna sodna praksa, pritožbo razglasi za očitno utemeljeno.
EFFECT ON A CROSS-APPEAL OF THE REMOVAL OF THE APPEAL FROM THE REGISTER
POSLEDICE IZBRISA GLAVNE PRITOŽBE ZA NASPROTNO PRITOŽBO
Effect on a cross-appeal of the discontinuance or manifest inadmissibility of the appeal
Posledice umika ali očitne nedopustnosti glavne pritožbe za nasprotno pritožbo
A cross-appeal shall be deemed to be devoid of purpose:
Šteje se, da je nasprotna pritožba brezpredmetna:
if the appellant discontinues his appeal;
če pritožnik umakne glavno pritožbo;
if the appeal is declared manifestly inadmissible for non-compliance with the time-limit for lodging an appeal;
če se glavna pritožba razglasi za očitno nedopustno zaradi nespoštovanja pritožbenega roka;
if the appeal is declared manifestly inadmissible on the sole ground that it is not directed against a final decision of the General Court or against a decision disposing of the substantive issues in part only or disposing of a procedural issue concerning a plea of lack of competence or inadmissibility within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute.
če se glavna pritožba razglasi za očitno nedopustno zgolj zato, ker ni vložena zoper končno odločbo Splošnega sodišča ali zoper delno odločbo o vsebinskih vprašanjih ali odločbo o procesnih vprašanjih glede nepristojnosti ali nedopustnosti v smislu člena 56, prvi odstavek, Statuta.
COSTS AND LEGAL AID IN APPEALS
STROŠKI IN BREZPLAČNA PRAVNA POMOČ V PRITOŽBENEM POSTOPKU
Costs in appeals
Ureditev stroškov v pritožbenem postopku
Subject to the following provisions, Articles 137 to 146 of these Rules shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the procedure before the Court of Justice on an appeal against a decision of the General Court.
Ob upoštevanju določb, ki sledijo, se v pritožbenem postopku pred Sodiščem zoper odločbo Splošnega sodišča smiselno uporabljajo členi od 137 do 146 tega poslovnika.
Where the appeal is unfounded or where the appeal is well founded and the Court itself gives final judgment in the case, the Court shall make a decision as to the costs.
Če pritožba ni utemeljena ali če je utemeljena in Sodišče samo dokončno odloči v sporu, o stroških odloči Sodišče.
When an appeal brought by a Member State or an institution of the European Union which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court is well founded, the Court of Justice may order that the parties share the costs or that the successful appellant pay the costs which the appeal has caused an unsuccessful party to incur.
Če je pritožba, ki jo vloži država članica ali institucija Unije, ki ni intervenirala v postopku pred Splošnim sodiščem, utemeljena, lahko Sodišče razdeli stroške med stranke ali naloži pritožniku, ki je uspel s pritožbo, plačilo stroškov, ki jih je zaradi pritožbenega postopka imela neuspela stranka v tem postopku.
Where the appeal has not been brought by an intervener at first instance, he may not be ordered to pay costs in the appeal proceedings unless he participated in the written or oral part of the proceedings before the Court of Justice.
Če pritožbe ni vložil intervenient na prvi stopnji, se mu lahko plačilo stroškov pritožbenega postopka naloži le, če je sodeloval pri pisnem ali ustnem delu postopka pred Sodiščem.
Where an intervener at first instance takes part in the proceedings, the Court may decide that he shall bear his own costs.
Če je intervenient sodeloval v postopku, lahko Sodišče odloči, da nosi svoje stroške.
Legal aid
Brezplačna pravna pomoč
A party who is wholly or in part unable to meet the costs of the proceedings may at any time apply for legal aid.
Stranka, ki je v celoti ali delno nesposobna plačati stroške postopka, lahko kadar koli zaprosi za brezplačno pravno pomoč.
Prior application for legal aid
Predhodna prošnja za brezplačno pravno pomoč
If the application is made prior to the appeal which the applicant for legal aid intends to commence, it shall briefly state the subject of the appeal.
Če se prošnja vloži pred vložitvijo nameravane pritožbe, prosilec v njej na kratko navede predmet pritožbe.
The application for legal aid need not be made through a lawyer.
Prošnje ni treba vložiti po odvetniku.
The introduction of an application for legal aid shall, with regard to the person who made that application, suspend the time-limit prescribed for the bringing of the appeal until the date of service of the order making a decision on that application.
Z vložitvijo prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč prosilcu preneha teči rok za vložitev pritožbe, in sicer do dneva vročitve sklepa, s katerim je o tej prošnji odločeno.
The President shall assign the application for legal aid, as soon as it is lodged, to a Judge-Rapporteur who shall put forward, promptly, a proposal as to the action to be taken on it.
Predsednik prošnjo takoj po vložitvi dodeli sodniku poročevalcu, ki v kar najkrajšem času predlaga, kako naj se o njej odloči.
The decision to grant legal aid, in whole or in part, or to refuse it shall be taken, on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, by the Chamber of three Judges to which the Judge-Rapporteur is assigned.
Odločitev o tem, da se brezplačna pravna pomoč v celoti ali delno odobri oziroma ali da se zavrne, sprejme na predlog sodnika poročevalca in po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca senat treh sodnikov, v katerega je razporejen sodnik poročevalec.
In that event, the formation of the Court shall be composed of the President of that Chamber, the Judge-Rapporteur and the first Judge or, as the case may be, the first two Judges designated from the list referred to in Article 28(3) on the date on which the application for legal aid is brought before that Chamber by the Judge-Rapporteur.
V tem primeru so v sestavi predsednik tega senata, sodnik poročevalec in prvi ali po potrebi prva dva sodnika, določena na podlagi seznama iz člena 28(3) na dan, ko sodnik poročevalec prošnjo za brezplačno pravno pomoč predloži senatu.
It shall consider, if appropriate, whether the appeal is manifestly unfounded.
Ta senat po potrebi preuči, ali ni pritožba morda očitno neutemeljena.
In its decision as to costs the Court may order the payment to the cashier of the Court of sums advanced as legal aid.
V odločbi o stroških se lahko naloži plačilo zneskov, izplačanih iz naslova brezplačne pravne pomoči, v korist blagajne Sodišča.
The Registrar shall take steps to obtain the recovery of these sums from the party ordered to pay them.
Sodni tajnik izterja te zneske od stranke, ki ji je bilo naloženo njihovo plačilo.
OTHER PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO APPEALS
DRUGE DOLOČBE, KI SE UPORABLJAJO ZA PRITOŽBENI POSTOPEK
Other provisions applicable to appeals
Druge določbe, ki se uporabljajo za pritožbeni postopek
Articles 127, 129 to 136, 147 to 150, 153 to 155 and 157 to 166 of these Rules shall apply to the procedure before the Court of Justice on an appeal against decisions of the General Court.
V pritožbenem postopku pred Sodiščem zoper odločbe Splošnega sodišča se uporabljajo členi 127, od 129 do 136, od 147 do 150, od 153 do 155 in od 157 do 166 tega poslovnika.
By way of derogation from Article 130(1), an application to intervene shall, however, be made within one month of the publication of the notice referred to in Article 21(4).
Vendar se z odstopanjem od člena 130(1) predlog za intervencijo vloži najpozneje v enem mesecu od objave obvestila iz člena 21(4).
Article 95 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to the procedure before the Court of Justice on an appeal against decisions of the General Court.
V pritožbenem postopku pred Sodiščem zoper odločbe Splošnega sodišča se smiselno uporablja člen 95.
Reviewing Chamber
Preveritveni senat
A Chamber of five Judges shall be designated for a period of one year for the purpose of deciding, in accordance with Articles 193 and 194 of these Rules, whether a decision of the General Court is to be reviewed in accordance with Article 62 of the Statute.
Za eno leto se določi senat petih sodnikov, ki v skladu s pogoji iz členov 193 in 194 tega poslovnika odloča, ali je treba v skladu s členom 62 Statuta preveriti odločbo Splošnega sodišča.
Information and communication of decisions which may be reviewed
Obvestitev o odločbah, ki bi se lahko preverile, in njihovo poslanje
As soon as the date for the delivery or signature of a decision to be given under Article 256(2) or (3) TFEU is fixed, the Registry of the General Court shall inform the Registry of the Court of Justice.
Takoj ko je določen dan razglasitve ali podpisa odločbe, ki se sprejme na podlagi člena 256(2) ali (3) PDEU, sodno tajništvo Splošnega sodišča o tem obvesti sodno tajništvo Sodišča.
The decision shall be communicated to the Registry of the Court of Justice immediately upon its delivery or signature, as shall the file in the case, which shall be made available forthwith to the First Advocate General.
Takoj ko je ta odločba razglašena ali podpisana, jo sodno tajništvo Splošnega sodišča pošlje sodnemu tajništvu Sodišča, prav tako pa mu pošlje spis, ki se da takoj na voljo prvemu generalnemu pravobranilcu.
Review of decisions given on appeal
Preverjanje odločb o pritožbah
The proposal of the First Advocate General to review a decision of the General Court given under Article 256(2) TFEU shall be forwarded to the President of the Court of Justice and to the President of the reviewing Chamber.
Predlog prvega generalnega pravobranilca za preveritev odločbe Splošnega sodišča, sprejete v skladu s členom 256(2) PDEU, se posreduje predsedniku Sodišča in predsedniku preveritvenega senata.
Notice of that transmission shall be given to the Registrar at the same time.
Sočasno je o tem obveščen sodni tajnik.
As soon as he is informed of the existence of a proposal, the Registrar shall communicate the file in the case before the General Court to the members of the reviewing Chamber.
Takoj ko je sodni tajnik obveščen o predlogu, pošlje spis postopka pred Splošnim sodiščem članom preveritvenega senata.
As soon as the proposal to review has been received, the President of the Court shall designate the Judge-Rapporteur from among the Judges of the reviewing Chamber on a proposal from the President of that Chamber.
Takoj po prejemu predloga za preveritev predsednik Sodišča na predlog predsednika preveritvenega senata enega od sodnikov iz tega senata določi za sodnika poročevalca.
The composition of the formation of the Court shall be determined in accordance with Article 28(2) of these Rules on the day on which the case is assigned to the Judge-Rapporteur.
Sestava se določi v skladu s členom 28(2) tega poslovnika, in sicer na dan dodelitve zadeve sodniku poročevalcu.
That Chamber, acting on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur, shall decide whether the decision of the General Court is to be reviewed.
Ta senat na predlog sodnika poročevalca odloči, ali je treba odločbo Splošnega sodišča preveriti.
The decision to review the decision of the General Court shall indicate only the questions which are to be reviewed.
V odločbi o preveritvi odločbe Splošnega sodišča se navedejo le vprašanja, ki bodo preverjena.
The General Court, the parties to the proceedings before it and the other interested persons referred to in the second paragraph of Article 62a of the Statute shall forthwith be informed by the Registrar of the decision of the Court of Justice to review the decision of the General Court.
Sodni tajnik o odločbi Sodišča o preveritvi odločbe Splošnega sodišča nemudoma obvesti Splošno sodišče, stranke v postopku pred njim in druge zainteresirane subjekte iz člena 62a, drugi odstavek, Statuta.
Notice of the date of the decision to review the decision of the General Court and of the questions which are to be reviewed shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Obvestilo o dnevu sprejetja odločbe o preveritvi odločbe Splošnega sodišča in o vprašanjih, ki bodo preverjena, se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Review of preliminary rulings
Preverjanje predhodnih odločb
The proposal of the First Advocate General to review a decision of the General Court given under Article 256(3) TFEU shall be forwarded to the President of the Court of Justice and to the President of the reviewing Chamber.
Predlog prvega generalnega pravobranilca za preveritev odločbe Splošnega sodišča, sprejete na podlagi člena 256(3) PDEU, se posreduje predsedniku Sodišča in predsedniku preveritvenega senata.
The Registrar shall also inform the General Court, the referring court or tribunal, the parties to the main proceedings and the other interested persons referred to in the second paragraph of Article 62a of the Statute of the existence of a proposal to review.
Sodni tajnik o predlogu za preveritev obvesti tudi Splošno sodišče, predložitveno sodišče, stranke v sporu o glavni stvari in druge zainteresirane subjekte iz člena 62a, drugi odstavek, Statuta.
The General Court, the referring court or tribunal, the parties to the main proceedings and the other interested persons referred to in the second paragraph of Article 62a of the Statute shall forthwith be informed by the Registrar of the decision of the Court of Justice as to whether or not the decision of the General Court is to be reviewed.
Sodni tajnik o odločbi Sodišča o preveritvi ali o nepreveritvi odločbe Splošnega sodišča nemudoma obvesti Splošno sodišče, predložitveno sodišče, stranke v sporu o glavni stvari in druge zainteresirane subjekte iz člena 62a, drugi odstavek, Statuta.
Judgment on the substance of the case after a decision to review
Sodba, s katero se po odločitvi o preveritvi odloči po vsebini
The decision to review a decision of the General Court shall be served on the parties and other interested persons referred to in the second paragraph of Article 62a of the Statute.
Odločba o preveritvi odločbe Splošnega sodišča se vroči strankam in drugim zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 62a, drugi odstavek, Statuta.
The decision served on the Member States, and the States, other than the Member States, which are parties to the EEA Agreement, as well as the EFTA Surveillance Authority, shall be accompanied by a translation of the decision of the Court of Justice in accordance with the provisions of Article 98 of these Rules.
Državam članicam in državam podpisnicam Sporazuma o EGP, ki niso države članice, ter Nadzornemu organu EFTA se vroči tudi priložen prevod odločbe Sodišča pod pogoji, določenimi v členu 98 tega poslovnika.
The decision of the Court of Justice shall also be communicated to the General Court and, if applicable, to the referring court or tribunal.
Poleg tega se odločba Sodišča posreduje tudi Splošnemu sodišču in po potrebi predložitvenemu sodišču.
Within one month of the date of service referred to in paragraph 1, the parties and other interested persons on whom the decision of the Court of Justice has been served may lodge statements or written observations on the questions which are subject to review.
Stranke in drugi zainteresirani subjekti, ki jim je bila vročena odločba Sodišča, lahko v enem mesecu od vročitve iz odstavka 1 predložijo vloge ali pisna stališča glede vprašanj, ki bodo preverjena.
As soon as a decision to review a decision of the General Court has been taken, the First Advocate General shall assign the review to an Advocate General.
Prvi generalni pravobranilec takoj po sprejetju odločbe o preveritvi odločbe Splošnega sodišča dodeli zadevo enemu od generalnih pravobranilcev.
The reviewing Chamber shall rule on the substance of the case, after hearing the Advocate General.
Preveritveni senat odloči po vsebini po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca.
It may, however, request the Court of Justice to assign the case to a formation of the Court composed of a greater number of Judges.
Sodišču lahko predlaga predodelitev zadeve številčnejši sestavi.
Where the decision of the General Court which is subject to review was given under Article 256(2) TFEU, the Court of Justice shall make a decision as to costs.
Če je bila odločba Splošnega sodišča, ki je predmet preverjanja, sprejeta na podlagi člena 256(2) PDEU, Sodišče odloči o stroških.
In accordance with Article 218(11) TFEU, a request for an Opinion may be made by a Member State, by the European Parliament, by the Council or by the European Commission.
V skladu s členom 218(11) PDEU lahko predlog za izdajo mnenja vloži država članica, Evropski parlament, Svet ali Evropska komisija.
A request for an Opinion may relate both to whether the envisaged agreement is compatible with the provisions of the Treaties and to whether the European Union or any institution of the European Union has the power to enter into that agreement.
Mnenje se lahko nanaša tako na vprašanje, ali je predvideni sporazum združljiv z določbami Pogodb, kot tudi na vprašanje, ali je Unija ali ena od institucij Unije pristojna za sklenitev tega sporazuma.
It shall be served on the Member States and on the institutions referred to in paragraph 1, and the President shall prescribe a time-limit within which they may submit written observations.
Mnenje se vroči državam članicam in institucijam iz odstavka 1, ki jim predsednik določi rok, v katerem lahko predložijo pisna stališča.
Designation of the Judge-Rapporteur and of the Advocate General
Določitev sodnika poročevalca in generalnega pravobranilca
As soon as the request for an Opinion has been submitted, the President shall designate a Judge-Rapporteur and the First Advocate General shall assign the case to an Advocate General.
Predsednik takoj po vložitvi predloga za izdajo mnenja določi sodnika poročevalca, prvi generalni pravobranilec pa dodeli zadevo enemu od generalnih pravobranilcev.
Time-limit for delivering the Opinion
Rok za izdajo mnenja
The Court shall deliver its Opinion as soon as possible, after hearing the Advocate General.
Sodišče po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca izda mnenje čim prej.
Delivery of the Opinion
Razglasitev mnenja
The Opinion, signed by the President, the Judges who took part in the deliberations and the Registrar, shall be delivered in open court.
Mnenje, ki ga podpišejo predsednik, sodniki, ki so sodelovali pri posvetovanju, in sodni tajnik, se javno razglasi.
It shall be served on all the Member States and on the institutions referred to in Article 196(1).
Vroči se vsem državam članicam in institucijam iz člena 196(1).
Appeals against decisions of the arbitration committee
Tožbe zoper odločbe Arbitražnega odbora
An application initiating an appeal under the second paragraph of Article 18 TEAEC shall state:
Tožba iz člena 18, drugi odstavek, PESAE vsebuje:
the name and permanent address of the applicant;
ime in naslov tožeče stranke;
the description of the signatory;
status podpisnika;
a reference to the arbitration committee’s decision against which the appeal is made;
navedbo izpodbijane odločbe Arbitražnega odbora;
the names of the respondents;
navedbo nasprotnih strank;
a summary of the facts;
povzetek dejanskega stanja;
the grounds on which the appeal is based and arguments relied on, and a brief statement of those grounds;
navajane razloge in trditve ter povzetek navedenih razlogov;
the form of order sought by the applicant.
predloge tožeče stranke.
Articles 119 and 121 of these Rules shall apply to the application.
Za tožbo se uporabljata člena 119 in 121 tega poslovnika.
A certified copy of the contested decision shall be annexed to the application.
Poleg tega se tožbi priloži overjen prepis izpodbijane odločbe.
As soon as the application has been lodged, the Registrar of the Court shall request the arbitration committee registry to transmit to the Court the file in the case.
Takoj po vložitvi tožbe sodni tajnik Sodišča pozove sodno tajništvo Arbitražnega odbora, naj Sodišču posreduje spis v zadevi.
Articles 123 and 124 of these Rules shall apply to this procedure.
Za nadaljevanje postopka se uporabljata člena 123 in 124 tega poslovnika.
The Court may decide that the procedure before it shall also include a hearing.
Sodišče lahko odloči, da bo postopek pred njim obsegal tudi obravnavo.
The Court shall give its decision in the form of a judgment.
Sodišče odloči s sodbo.
Where the Court sets aside the decision of the arbitration committee it may refer the case back to the committee.
Če Sodišče razveljavi odločbo Arbitražnega odbora, mu lahko po potrebi vrne zadevo v odločanje.
Procedure under Article 103 TEAEC
Postopek iz člena 103 PESAE
Four certified copies shall be lodged of an application under the third paragraph of Article 103 TEAEC.
Predlog na podlagi člena 103, tretji odstavek, PESAE se vloži v štirih overjenih izvodih.
The application shall be accompanied by the draft of the agreement or contract concerned, by the observations of the European Commission addressed to the State concerned and by all other supporting documents.
Priložijo se mu osnutek zadevnega sporazuma ali pogodbe, stališča Evropske komisije, naslovljena na zadevno državo, in vsa druga dokazila.
The application and annexes thereto shall be served on the European Commission, which shall have a time-limit of 10 days from such service to submit its written observations.
Predlog s prilogami se vroči Evropski komisiji, ki lahko v desetih dneh od vročitve predloži pisna stališča.
This time-limit may be extended by the President after the State concerned has been heard.
Predsednik lahko po opredelitvi zadevne države ta rok podaljša.
Following the lodging of such observations, which shall be served on the State concerned, the Court shall give its decision promptly, after hearing the Advocate General and, if they so request, the State concerned and the European Commission.
Po predložitvi teh stališč, ki se vročijo zadevni državi, Sodišče po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca ter zadevne države in Evropske komisije, če ti to zahtevata, odloči v kar najkrajšem času.
Procedures under Articles 104 TEAEC and 105 TEAEC
Postopka iz člena 104 PESAE in 105 PESAE
Applications under the third paragraph of Article 104 TEAEC and the second paragraph of Article 105 TEAEC shall be governed by the provisions of Titles II and IV of these Rules.
Prošnja iz člena 104, tretji odstavek, PESAE in predlog iz člena 105, drugi odstavek, PESAE sta urejena z določbami naslovov II in IV tega poslovnika.
Such applications shall also be served on the State to which the respondent person or undertaking belongs.
Vročita se tudi državi, katere državljan je oseba oziroma v kateri ima sedež podjetje, na katero se ta prošnja ali predlog nanaša.
Procedure provided for by Article 111(3) of the EEA Agreement
Postopek iz člena 111(3) Sporazuma o EGP
In the case governed by Article 111(3) of the EEA Agreement, the matter shall be brought before the Court by a request submitted by the Contracting Parties which are parties to the dispute.
V primeru iz člena 111(3) Sporazuma o EGP se zadeva predloži Sodišču s predlogom, ki ga vložijo podpisnice, ki so stranke v sporu.