natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The GOC claimed that the banks are not required to follow the industrial guidelines, do not have individual business decisions dictated to them by the government, and the banking sector is not predominated by the government.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da bankam ni treba upoštevati industrijskih smernic, da jim vlada ne narekuje posameznih poslovnih odločitev in da vlada ne prevladuje nad bančnim sektorjem.
Articles 24 and 25 of the Order No 35 limit the provision of loans only to those companies which comply with national development policies for the iron and steel industry, therefore the claim of the GOC are not required to follow the industrial policies is in contradiction to this evidence.
Člena 24 in 25 Odredbe št. 35 dodeljevanje posojil omejujeta samo na tiste družbe, ki ravnajo skladno z nacionalnimi razvojnimi politikami za industrijo železa in jekla, torej je trditev kitajske vlade, da jim ni treba upoštevati industrijskih politik, v nasprotju s tem dokazom.
Clearly, these provisions restrict which companies the banks can finance and which not.
Jasno je, da te določbe omejujejo, katere družbe lahko banke financirajo in katere ne.
Also the claim that the banking sector is not dominated by the Government must be disregarded.
Prav tako se ne sme upoštevati trditev, da vlada ne prevladuje nad bančnim sektorjem.
In this respect it is noted that the GOC provided only very limited information on the ownership structure in the banking sector, claiming it does not possess such information, although according to Article 24 of the Commercial Banking Law all banks are obliged to report such information to the China Banking Regulatory Commission, a state agency authorised by the State Council.
V zvezi s tem je ugotovljeno, da je kitajska vlada zagotovila le zelo omejene informacije o lastniški strukturi v bančnem sektorju, pri čemer je trdila, da teh informacij nima, čeprav morajo v skladu s členom 24 zakona o poslovnem bančništvu vse banke predložiti te informacije Komisiji bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske, državni agenciji s pooblastilom državnega sveta.
The other information on the files cited in this regulation led to the conclusion that the banking sector in China is indeed dominated by the government (see recitals (166)-(169) above).
Druge informacije o citiranih dokumentih v tej uredbi so pripeljale do sklepa, da nad bančnim sektorjem na Kitajskem dejansko prevladuje vlada (glej uvodne izjave od (166) do (169)).
In addition to the sources referred to in this regulation, the IMF Country Report No 11/321 on China from November 2011 states that the state is also directly and indirectly involved in the financial sector and recommends the re-orientation in the role and responsibilities of the government in the financial sector away from using the banking system to carry out broad government policy goals and to allow lending decisions to be based on commercial goals [98] [99].
Poleg virov, navedenih v tej uredbi, Poročilo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada o posameznih državah št. 11/321 za Kitajsko iz novembra 2011 navaja, da je država tudi neposredno in posredno vključena v finančni sektor, ter priporoča, naj se vloga in odgovornost države v finančnem sektorju preusmerita stran od uporabe bančnega sistema za uresničevanje širokih ciljev politike vlade ter omogočita sprejemanje odločitev glede posojil na podlagi poslovnih ciljev [98], [99].
The GOC claimed that its failure to comply with the demands of Appendix A to the GOC questionnaire could not trigger a valid resort to facts available, because the Commission should not have held the GOC responsible to provide internal, sensitive, transaction-specific data concerning banks many of which were not in any way owned by the government.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da samo zato, ker ni izpolnila zahtev Priloge A svojega vprašalnika, uporaba razpoložljivih dejstev še ni bila veljavna, ker Komisija ne bi smela kitajski vladi naložiti odgovornosti, da zagotovi notranje občutljive podatke, specifične za posamezen posel, v zvezi z bankami, med katerimi jih veliko ni bilo na noben način v lasti vlade.
As explained in the recital (426) above the GOC had access at least to some of the requested information but refused to provide any answers to questions in Appendix A. In this respect it is also noted that since the GOC refused to provide any ownership data the Commission, in the case of many banks, did not know which banks are and which are not state-owned.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (426), je kitajska vlada imela dostop do vsaj nekaterih zahtevanih informacij, vendar ni želela zagotoviti odgovorov na vprašanja v Prilogi A. V zvezi s tem je ugotovljeno tudi, da Komisija, ker ji kitajska vlada ni želela zagotoviti podatkov o lastništvu, za veliko bank ni vedela, ali so v državni lasti ali ne.
In relation to certain Circulars of the PBOC the GOC claims that the publicly available summaries of the contents of the relevant circulars together with the testimonies of the PBOC officials are sufficient to replace the actual Circulars of the PBOC and no facts available should be applied due to the GOC's failure to provide these.
V zvezi z nekaterimi okrožnicami Ljudske banke Kitajske (LBK) kitajska vlada trdi, da so javno dostopni povzetki vsebin ustreznih okrožnic skupaj s pričevanji uradnikov LBK ustrezno nadomestilo dejanskih okrožnic LBK, pri čemer se ne bi smela uporabiti nobena razpoložljiva dejstva, ker jih kitajska vlada ni zagotovila.
The GOC also claimed that the Commission has rejected information provided in good faith, i.e. the testimony of the PBOC official combined with the abstract of the circulars at issue and referred to the Article 28 of the Basic Regulation which says that only the information which is false or misleading may be disregarded.
Kitajska vlada je tudi trdila, da je Komisija zavrnila informacije, predložene v dobri veri, tj. pričevanje uradnika LBK skupaj s povzetkom zadevnih okrožnic, in je navedla člen 28 osnovne uredbe, ki določa, da se lahko zanemarijo le informacije, ki so napačne ali zavajajoče.
In addition GOC claimed that the Commission did not base its findings on actual facts available or the the information provided, but rather made it incumbent upon the GOC to prove that the state of affairs examined during the Coated Fine Paper case was no longer current.
Poleg tega je kitajska vlada trdila, da Komisija svojih ugotovitev ni utemeljila na dejanskih dejstvih ali predloženih informacijah, temveč je kitajski vladi naložila dolžnost dokazati, da stanje, ki se je preiskalo v okviru primera premazanega finega papirja, ne obstaja več.
In this case, according to the GOC, the Coated Fine Paper findings do not even contradict the information provided by the GOC, since these were based on information pertaining to a different time period altogether.
Glede na trditve kitajske vlade v tem primeru ugotovitve v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem niti niso v nasprotju z informacijami, ki jih je predložila kitajska vlada, ker so v celoti temeljile na informacijah iz drugega obdobja.
Concerning the extracts provided from the PBOC and website and the testimony of the PBOC official, these could not have been verified without the source documents, i.e. the Circulars themselves.
Kar zadeva povzetke in spletno mesto LBK ter pričevanje uradnika LBK, teh informacij ni bilo mogoče preveriti brez izvirnih dokumentov, tj. okrožnic.
The Commission fails to understand why on the one hand the GOC considers these to be confidential internal documentation and on the other the summary of the contents is allegedly published on the website of PBOC.
Komisija ne razume, zakaj kitajska vlada na eni strani meni, da je to zaupna interna dokumentacija, po drugi strani pa je povzetek vsebine domnevno objavljen na spletnem mestu LBK.
The Coated Fine Paper findings are highly relevant to the present case.
Ugotovitve v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem so v tem primeru zelo pomembne.
The fact that the information pertained to a different time period is of limited relevance, as the facts on the record (including the complaint) demonstrate that the practices in question have not changed since then.
Dejstvo, da so informacije izvirale iz drugega obdobja, ni tako zelo pomembno, ker dejstva v spisu (vključno s pritožbo) kažejo, da se zadevne prakse od takrat niso spremenile.
As regards GOC's allegation that the Commission is reversing the burden of proof, it is noted that the Coated Fine Paper findings are part of the totality of the evidence taken into account but that the GOC is not required to "disprove" them.
V zvezi z domnevo kitajske vlade, da Komisija poskuša prevaliti dokazno breme, je ugotovljeno, da so ugotovitve v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem del upoštevanih skupnih dokazov, ampak da jih kitajski vladi ni treba „ovreči“.
Co-operation in such investigations is two-way process and all parties may offer evidence or arguments to rebut other evidence on the record.
Sodelovanje v takih preiskavah je dvostranski proces in vsaka stran lahko predloži dokaze ali argumente, ki izpodbijajo dokaze v spisu druge strani.
The GOC argues that the Commission has not found that the GOC benchmark rates reflect a non-commercial distortion (thereby conceding that the Chinese market interest rates generally reflect adequate remuneration) and that the fact that there is only a lower limit on the interest rates for commercial loans works to the detriment of the exporting producers making use of such loans rather than benefit.
Kitajska vlada trdi, da Komisija ni ugotovila, da referenčne vrednosti kitajske vlade odražajo netržno izkrivljanje (s čimer priznava, da obrestne mere na kitajskem trgu na splošno odražajo ustrezno nadomestilo) in da omejitev obrestnih mer za poslovna posojila zgolj navzdol proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki uporabljajo taka posojila, prej škoduje kot koristi.
Without the PBOC-imposed floor, those rates may well have been considerably lower.
Če LBK ne bi določila najnižje meje, bi bile lahko te mere še precej nižje.
This argument is misplaced.
Ta utemeljitev je napačna.
The fact that the GOC (PBOC) sets the benchmark rates arbitrarily points to non-commercial behaviour at the first place.
Dejstvo, da kitajska vlada (LBK) določa referenčne stopnje, na splošno osnovi kaže samovoljno netržno vedenje.
This is also confirmed by the IMF Country Report No 11/321 [100] on China from November 2011 which refers to interest regulation.
To potrjuje tudi Poročilo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada o posameznih državah št. 11/321 [100] za Kitajsko iz novembra 2011, ki navaja regulacijo obresti.
The GOC claimed that the Commission failed to assess the creditworthiness of the actual parties investigated as it did in the Coated Fine Paper case.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da Komisija ni ocenila kreditne sposobnosti dejanskih preiskovanih strani, kot je to storila v primeru premazanega finega papirja.
In reply, the creditworthiness of the sampled exporting producers was not assessed as it is in any event influenced by the industrial policies and by state support and intervention.
V odgovoru kreditna sposobnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni bila ocenjena, ker nanjo vedno vplivajo industrijske politike ter podpora in posredovanje države.
As it was found that the financial system in China is distorted this would be a pointless exercise.
To bi bilo nesmiselno, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da je finančni sistem na Kitajskem izkrivljen.
There was no such creditworthiness assessment in Coated Fine Paper case.
V primeru premazanega finega papirja take ocene kreditne sposobnosti ni bilo.
Given the distortions and the lack of proper creditworthiness or risk assessment of the OCS producers by the lending banks the Commission could not have taken the credit rating (if they had any at all) of the individual exporting producers at its face value.
Glede na izkrivljanja in odsotnost ustrezne ocene kreditne sposobnosti ali tveganja proizvajalcev jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s strani bank upnic, Komisija ni mogla pridobiti bonitetne ocene (če jo sploh imajo) posameznih proizvajalcev izvoznikov po nominalni vrednosti.
The BB rating is in this case not unfavourable for the exporting producers because it is the best non-investment rating on the market.
Bonitetna ocena BB v tem primeru ni neugodna za proizvajalce izvoznike, ker je najboljša neinvesticijska ocena na trgu.
Provision of LURs for less than adequate remuneration
Zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišč za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo
The GOC claimed that the Commission recognised that the GOC's claims that the LURs are provided with reference to competition are such that they would obviate the need for an external benchmark.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je Komisija priznala pomen njenih trditev v zvezi z zagotavljanjem pravic do uporabe zemljišč glede na konkurenco, ki bi pomenile odpravo potrebe po zunanji referenčni vrednosti.
GOC also claimed that throughout its explanation of why the GOC claims were rejected the Commission focuses solely on the GOC evidence rather than the facts actually available.
Kitajska vlada je tudi trdila, da se v pojasnilu vzrokov za zavrnitev trditev kitajske vlade Komisija osredotoča le na dokaze kitajske vlade, namesto na dejansko razpoložljiva dejstva.
The GOC requests that the Commission disclose the actual factual basis it has determined that the prices set by the local authorities were arbitrary, i.e. that they did not refer or relate to the supply and demand for industrial land.
Kitajska vlada zahteva, da Komisija razkrije dejansko podlago za svojo ugotovitev, da lokalni organi poljubno določajo cene, tj. da ne upoštevajo ponudbe in povpraševanja za industrijska zemljišča.
The GOC's understanding of this issue is not correct.
Razumevanje tega vprašanja s strani kitajske vlade ni pravilno.
The Commission did not find that that the LURs are provided with reference to competition.
Komisija ni ugotovila, da se pravice do uporabe zemljišč zagotavljajo glede na konkurenco.
The Commission found that out of the 13 LUR transactions only 6 were to be subject to bidding or auction process.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bilo predmet razpisnih ali dražbenih postopkov le šest od trinajstih poslov s pravicami do uporabe zemljišč.
With regard to these 6 the evidence submitted in this respect showed that the tenders were not competitive as there was only one offer/bid and the price was set by the authorities.
Kar zadeva teh šest poslov, predloženi dokazi kažejo, da razpisi niso bili konkurenčni, saj je bila le ena ponudba, ceno pa so določili organi.
The Commission did not understand the GOC's requests for the facts available used in respect to the lack of a market for LUR to be disclosed when no facts available were used to reject GOC claims in this matter and the analysis was done on the basis of information submitted by the GOC and exporting producers in this respect.
Komisija ni razumela zahtev kitajske vlade po razkritju uporabljenih razpoložljivih dejstev v zvezi z odsotnostjo trga za pravice do uporabe zemljišč, saj niso bila uporabljena nobena razpoložljiva dejstva za zavrnitev trditev kitajske vlade v tej zadevi, in v zvezi s tem so na podlagi predloženih informacij kitajska vlada in proizvajalci izvozniki opravili analizo.
The factual basis for the determination that the prices are arbitrarily set is referred to in recitals (114) - (116) above, i.e. information on actual transactions submitted by the sampled exporting producers, Urban Land Evaluation System and Order No 35.
Dejanska podlaga za ugotovitev, da se cene določajo poljubno, je navedena v uvodnih izjavah od (114) do (116); gre za informacije o dejanskih transakcijah, ki so jih predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, sistem vrednotenja mestnih zemljišč in Odredba št. 35.
According to the GOC the Commission did not determine specificity under Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the ASCM, nor did it clearly substantiate its determinations of specificity on the basis of positive evidence, as required by Article 2.4 of the ASCM.
Kitajska vlada meni, da Komisija ni določila specifičnosti v skladu s členoma 2.1 in 2.2 Sporazuma SIU, niti ni ustrezno utemeljila svojih določitev specifičnosti na podlagi pozitivnih dokazov, kot zahteva člen 2.4 Sporazuma SIU.
In addition, it did not substantiate the need to base the benefit amount on an out-of-country benchmark nor did it construct the benchmark selected in the manner consistent with Article 14 (d) of the ASCM.
Poleg tega tudi ni utemeljila, zakaj bi bilo treba znesek ugodnosti utemeljiti na zunanjih referenčnih vrednostih, in izbrane referenčne vrednosti ni oblikovala v skladu s členom 14(d) Sporazuma SIU.
These claims had to be rejected.
Te trditve je bilo treba zavrniti. Komisija je ugotovila specifičnost na podlagi dejstva, da so vse družbe, ki ne ravnajo v skladu z državno določenimi industrijskimi politikami, izključene iz zagotavljanja pravic do uporabe zemljišč, da cene pogosto poljubno določijo organi ter da so vladne prakse nejasne in nepregledne.
The basis for Commission's specificity findings is the fact that all companies which do not comply with industrial policies set by the state are excluded from the provision of LUR, prices are often arbitrarily set by the authorities and government practices are unclear and non-transparent The need for the out-of-country benchmark was explained and justified in recitals (109), (118) and (120)-(121) above.
Potreba po zunanji referenčni vrednosti je bila pojasnjena in utemeljena v uvodnih izjavah (109), (118), (120) in (121) zgoraj.
As it was found that the LUR market in China is distorted it was not possible to apply in-country benchmark as proposed by the GOC.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da je trg pravic do uporabe zemljišč na Kitajskem izkrivljen, ni bilo mogoče uporabiti referenčne vrednosti znotraj države, kot je predlagala kitajska vlada.
The Commission does not agree with the claim that the benchmark was constructed in a manner inconsistent with Article 14(d) of the ASCM.
Komisija se ne strinja s trditvijo, da referenčna vrednost ni bila oblikovana v skladu s členom 14(d) Sporazuma SIU.
The Taiwan benchmark is considered a best proxy available to the Commission and is consistent with the recommendations of the AB in DS 379.
Tajvanska referenčna vrednost se šteje za najboljši približek, ki je na voljo Komisiji, in je v skladu s priporočili poročila PO v DS 379.
The GOC claims that it suggested that any possible benchmark should be in-country and be based on the prices that "not favoured" Chinese industries were paying;
Kitajska vlada trdi, da je predlagala, naj se vsaka mogoča referenčna vrednost oblikuje znotraj države in temelji na cenah, ki jih plačujejo „nefavorizirane“ kitajske industrije;
according to GOC, this is precisely because there is no distinction in the first place, and that therefore the subsidy amount would rightly be zero.
po mnenju kitajske vlade je edini razlog nerazlikovanje od samega začetka in bi zato znesek subvencije upravičeno bil ničeln.
The Commission does not agree with this claim and in any event the GOC did not provide any information for the "non-favoured" industries LUR prices which could, in theory, be used for the benchmark construction.
Komisija se s to trditvijo ne strinja in kitajska vlada ni nikoli zagotovila informacij o cenah pravic do uporabe zemljišč za „nefavorizirane“ industrije, ki bi se teoretično lahko uporabile za oblikovanje referenčne vrednosti.
GOC also claims that the complainant provided no indication or evidence that LURs were granted in particular to any subset of limited enterprises and the Union has not made the crucial finding that the provision of LURs is explicitly limited to certain/encouraged enterprises.
Kitajska vlada poleg tega trdi, da pritožnik ni navedel prikaza ali dokazov, da so bile pravice do uporabe zemljišč odobrene kateri koli omejeni podmnožici družb, in da EU ni prišla do ključne ugotovitve, da je zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišč omejeno na določene/spodbujane družbe.
The Commission has made the finding that the provision of LUR is limited to companies which comply with the industrial policies set by the GOC in the Order No 35 of the NDRC (recital (116) above).
Komisija je ugotovitev, da je zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišč omejeno na družbe, ki ravnajo v skladu z industrijskimi politikami, ki jih določa kitajska vlada, navedla v Odredbi agencije NDRC št. 35 (uvodna izjava (116)).
The GOC claimed that the Commission did not perform a rigorous examination in order to find a benchmark that refers or relates to the situation in China and that the Commission did not do its best to identify a benchmark that approximates the market conditions that would prevail in the absence of the distortion, or if it did it has not explained how this is so.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da Komisija ni izvedla natančne preiskave z namenom poiskati referenčno vrednost, ki se nanaša na položaj na Kitajskem, in da Komisija ni storila vsega, kar je bilo v njeni moči, da bi identificirala referenčno vrednost, ki je približno enaka pogojem na neizkrivljenem trgu, ali, če je to storila, ni pojasnila, kako.
The Commission indeed looked in detail in the various indicators and compared Taiwan and PRC as a whole as well as individual Chinese provinces concerned.
Komisija je vsekakor podrobno obravnavala različne kazalnike ter primerjala Tajvan z LRK kot celoto in tudi s posameznimi zadevnimi kitajskimi provincami.
After such analyses the Commission considers Taiwan [101] as an appropriate benchmark because of the totality of the information on the file i.e. (i) the level of economic development and economic structure prevailing in Taiwan and the relevant Chinese provinces and city [102] where the co-operating exporting producers are established, (ii) the physical proximity of these two Chinese provinces with Taiwan, (iii) the high degree of infrastructure that both Taiwan and these two Chinese provinces have, (iv) the strong economic ties and cross border trade between Taiwan and the PRC, (v) the similar density of population in the Chinese provinces concerned and in Taiwan, (vi) the similarity between the type of land and transactions used for constructing the relevant benchmark in Taiwan with those in the PRC and (vii) the common demographic, linguistic and cultural characteristics in both Taiwan and the PRC.
Po teh analizah Komisija meni, da je Tajvan [101] ustrezna referenčna vrednost zaradi vseh informacij v spisu tj. (i) stopnje gospodarskega razvoja in gospodarske strukture, ki prevladuje na Tajvanu ter v zadevnih kitajskih provincah in mestu [102], kjer imajo sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki sedež; (ii) fizične bližine teh dveh kitajskih provinc in Tajvana;
Furthermore, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces together with Chongqing City are considered top manufacturing provinces in the PRC.
visoke ravni infrastrukture, ki jo imajo Tajvan in ti dve kitajski provinci; (iv) močnih gospodarskih vezi in čezmejne trgovine med Tajvanom in LRK; (v) podobne gostote naseljenosti v zadevnih kitajskih provincah in na Tajvanu;
Although the GDP per capita of Taiwan and the Chinese provinces and Chongqing City is not identical, the GDP of these Chinese provinces and Chongqing City has grown rapidly in recent years i.e. they are catching up with Taiwan.
podobnosti med vrsto zemljišč in transakcij, uporabljenih za oblikovanje ustrezne referenčne vrednosti na Tajvanu, s tistimi v LRK; ter (vii) skupnih demografskih, jezikovnih in kulturnih značilnosti Tajvana in LRK. Treba je tudi dodati, da se provinci Jiangsu in Zhejiang skupaj z mestom Chongqing štejejo za najpomembnejše proizvodne province v LRK. Čeprav BDP na prebivalca na Tajvanu in v teh kitajskih provincah ter mestu Chongqing ni enak, pa BDP v teh kitajskih provincah in mestu Chongqing v zadnjih letih hitro narašča, tj. dohitevajo Tajvan.
In addition, recent data suggest that the both PRC as a whole, the two provinces and Chongqing City have much higher GDP growth rate than Taiwan [103], i.e. they are catching up very fast.
Poleg tega najnovejši podatki kažejo, da imajo LRK kot celota, zadevni provinci in mesto Chongqing precej višjo stopnjo rasti BDP v primerjavi s Tajvanom [103], tj. zelo hitro zmanjšujejo zaostanek.