natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The envisaged national measure notified under Article 114(5) TFEU would lower the content of cadmium allowed in phosphorous fertilisers from the current maximum level of 100 grams of cadmium per tonne of phosphorus to a level of 46 grams of cadmium per tonne of phosphorus (46 mg Cd/kg P, equivalent to 20 mg Cd/kg P2O5).
Načrtovani nacionalni ukrep, priglašen v skladu s členom 114(5) PDEU, bi znižal največjo dovoljeno vsebnost kadmija v fosfornih gnojilih s sedanjih 100 gramov kadmija na tono fosforja na 46 gramov kadmija na tono fosforja (46 mg Cd/kg P, kar je enako 20 mg Cd/kg P2O5).
By letter of 17 May 2011 the Kingdom of Sweden notified the Commission that, pursuant to Article 114(5) TFEU, it requests approval to introduce national provisions to lower the content of cadmium allowed in phosphorous fertilisers to a maximum concentration of 46 grams per tonne of phosphorus.
V dopisu z dne 17. maja 2011 je Kraljevina Švedska v skladu s členom 114(5) PDEU Komisijo uradno zaprosila za odobritev uvedbe nacionalnih določb za znižanje dovoljene vsebnosti kadmija v fosfornih gnojilih na največ 46 gramov kadmija na tono fosforja.
The Swedish authorities thus request to lower the cadmium content allowed by the derogation provided by Decision 2006/347/EC.
Švedski organi tako zahtevajo znižanje vsebnosti kadmija, odobrene z odstopanjem iz Odločbe 2006/347/ES.
By letter of 17 October 2011, the Swedish authorities sent additional information to the Commission to provide the text of the national legislation in force reflecting the amendments introduced by Ordinances 2008:255 and 2009:654 [7].
V dopisu z dne 17. oktobra 2011 so švedski organi Komisiji poslali dodatne informacije v obliki besedila veljavne nacionalne zakonodaje, v kateri so upoštevane spremembe, sprejete z odlokoma 2008:255 in 2009:654 [7].
By letter of 14 November 2011, the Commission informed the Swedish authorities that the six-month period for its examination according to Article 114(6) started on 18 October 2011.
V dopisu z dne 14. novembra 2011 je Komisija obvestila švedske organe, da je šestmesečno obdobje za proučitev določb v skladu s členom 114(6) začelo teči 18. oktobra 2011.
By letter of 17 October 2011, the Commission informed the other Member States about the request received from Sweden.
V dopisu z dne 17. oktobra 2011 je Komisija obvestila druge države članice o zahtevku, ki ga je poslala Švedska.
The Commission also published a notice regarding the request in the Official Journal of the European Union [8] in order to inform other interested parties of the national measures that Sweden intends to introduce as well as the grounds invoked to that effect.
Komisija je obvestilo o zahtevku objavila tudi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [8], da bi druge zainteresirane strani obvestila o nacionalnih ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti Švedska, in o razlogih, na katere se pri tem sklicuje.
In reaction, Latvia supported the Swedish request.
Kot odziv je Latvija podprla švedski zahtevek.
No other comments were received by the Commission.
Komisija drugih pripomb ni prejela.
In view of the complexity of the matter, the Commission requested the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) for an opinion on the overall quality of the Swedish risk assessment, any significant deficiencies, the appropriateness of the scenarios studied and the assumptions made, as well as the reliability and validity of the conclusions concerning the identified risks for the environment.
Glede na zahtevnost zadeve je Komisija Znanstveni odbor za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZOZOT) prosila za mnenje o splošni kakovosti švedske ocene tveganja, morebitnih pomembnih pomanjkljivostih, primernosti obravnavanih scenarijev in predpostavk ter zanesljivosti in veljavnosti sklepov v zvezi z ugotovljenimi tveganji za okolje.
However, SCHER considered that a number of statements in the report were not supported by sufficient evidence.
Vendar ZOZOT meni, da več trditev v poročilu ni utemeljenih z zadostnimi dokazi.
Due to the remaining uncertainties identified by the SCHER regarding key assumptions used by the Swedish authorities to conclude that there is a risk to aquatic organisms in small brooks in Sweden, which is the only environmental risk identified by the Swedish authorities, and in the absence of evidence highlighting a danger for human health linked to a prolongation of the period for assessment of the Swedish request, the Commission deemed justified to extend the period referred to in Article 114(6), first subparagraph.
Ker je ZOZOT ugotovil, da obstajajo nejasnosti glede osrednjih predpostavk, ki so jih švedski organi uporabili pri sklepu, da obstaja tveganje za vodne organizme v majhnih potokih na Švedskem, kar je edino okoljsko tveganje, ki so ga švedski organi opredelili, ter ker ni dokaza, da bi podaljšanje obdobja za oceno švedskega zahtevka lahko povzročilo nevarnost za zdravje ljudi, je Komisija menila, da je primerno podaljšati obdobje iz prvega pododstavka člena 114(6).
On 18 April 2012, the Commission notified the Kingdom of Sweden of its Decision [10], pursuant to Article 114(6), third subparagraph, TFEU, to extend the period of six months referred to in its first subparagraph to approve or reject the notified national provisions for a further period expiring on 18 October 2012.
Komisija je 18. aprila 2012 uradno obvestila Kraljevino Švedsko o svojem sklepuf [10] v skladu s tretjim pododstavkom člena 114(6) PDEU, da šestmesečni rok iz prvega pododstavka te pogodbe za odobritev ali zavrnitev priglašenih nacionalnih določb podaljša do 18. oktobra 2012.
By letter of 27 April 2012, the Commission informed the Swedish authorities about the uncertainties identified in the SCHER opinion and invited them to provide further clarifications that would allow the Commission to take a final position.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 27. aprila 2012 obvestila švedske organe o nejasnostih, ki jih je ZOZOT ugotovil v mnenju, ter jih pozvala, naj ji pošljejo dodatna pojasnila, ki bi ji omogočila sprejetje končnega stališča.
By letter of 2 July 2012, the Swedish authorities replied to the Commission without addressing the uncertainties identified by SCHER and, instead, argued that the notion of ‘protection of the environment’ under Article 114(5) TFEU covers health aspects.
Švedski organi so Komisiji odgovorili v dopisu z dne 2. julija 2012, ne da bi odgovorili na nejasnosti, ki jih je ugotovil ZOZOT; namesto tega so trdili, da izraz „varstvo okolja na podlagi člena 114(5) PDEU“ obsega zdravstvene vidike.
Therefore, an examination of the Swedish notification should include arguments in the notification relating to human health aspects.
Zato je treba v proučitev švedske priglasitve vključiti argumente iz priglasitve v zvezi z vidiki za zdravje ljudi.
The Commission considered in Decision 2012/230/EU that the application submitted by the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to obtaining an authorisation to introduce stricter national measures concerning the maximum admissible content of cadmium in fertilisers is admissible.
Komisija je v Sklepu 2012/230/EU menila, da je zahtevek za pridobitev dovoljenja, da se uvedejo strožji nacionalni ukrepi v zvezi z največjo dovoljeno vsebnostjo kadmija v gnojilih, ki ga je vložila Kraljevina Švedska, dopusten.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 114 TFEU, the Commission has to assure that all conditions enabling a Member State to avail of the possibilities of derogation provided for in that Article are met.
Komisija mora v skladu z določbami člena 114 PDEU zagotoviti, da so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji, ki državi članici omogočajo, da uporabi možnosti odstopanja iz navedenega člena.
Article 114(5) TFEU requires that when a Member State deems it necessary to introduce national provisions derogating from a harmonisation measure, those provisions have to be justified on the basis of new scientific evidence relating to the protection of the environment or the working environment, on grounds of a problem specific to that Member State arising after the adoption of the harmonisation measure.
V členu 114(5) PDEU je določeno, da morajo biti določbe, za katere država članica meni, da jih mora uvesti zaradi problema, ki je specifičen zanjo in je posledica sprejetja usklajevalnega ukrepa, in ki odstopajo od usklajevalnega ukrepa, upravičene na podlagi novih znanstvenih spoznanj o varstvu okolja ali delovnega okolja.
In addition, pursuant to Article 114(6) TFEU, the Commission is either to approve or reject the draft national provisions in question after verifying whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States, and whether or not they shall constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
Poleg tega mora Komisija v skladu s členom 114(6) PDEU odobriti ali zavrniti zadevne osnutke nacionalnih določb, potem ko preveri, ali so morda sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrita omejitev trgovine med državami članicami in ali ovirajo delovanje notranjega trga.
Concerns regarding adverse effects of cadmium in fertilisers on the environment (and human health) were already extensively raised during the negotiations for the accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the European Union.
Precej pomislekov glede škodljivih učinkov kadmija v gnojilih za okolje (in zdravje ljudi) je bilo izraženih že med pogajanji za pristop Avstrije, Finske in Švedske k Evropski uniji.
As indicated above, those three Member States were granted temporary derogations from Union legislation on fertilisers in order to allow a careful evaluation of the risks from cadmium in fertilisers at EU level.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, so bila tem trem državam odobrena začasna odstopanja od zakonodaje Unije v zvezi z gnojili, da je bilo mogoče na ravni EU izvesti natančno oceno tveganja zaradi kadmija v gnojilih.
In 2002, the Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (SCTEE) was asked by the Commission for its opinion [11] on the likelihood for accumulation of cadmium in soils through the use of phosphate fertilisers.
Komisija je leta 2002 Znanstveni odbor za toksičnost, ekotoksičnost in okolje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Znanstveni odbor) prosila za mnenje [11] o verjetnosti kopičenja kadmija v tleh zaradi uporabe fosfornih gnojil.
Based on risk assessment studies carried out by eight Member States and additional analysis, the SCTEE estimated that phosphate fertilisers containing 60 mg cadmium/kg P2O5 or more are expected to lead to cadmium accumulation in most EU soils whereas phosphate fertilisers containing 20 mg cadmium/kg P2O5 or less are not expected to cause long-term soil accumulation over 100 years, if other cadmium inputs are not considered.
Znanstveni odbor je na podlagi študij ocen tveganja, ki jih je izvedlo osem držav članic, in dodatne analize ocenil, da naj bi fosforna gnojila, ki vsebujejo 60 mg kadmija/kg P2O5 ali več, vodila do kopičenja kadmija v večini tal v EU, medtem ko naj fosforna gnojila, ki vsebujejo 20 mg kadmija/kg P2O5 ali manj, ne bi povzročala dolgotrajnega kopičenja v tleh v 100 letih, če se drugi viri vnosa kadmija ne upoštevajo.
In the framework of Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances [12], cadmium and cadmium oxide were identified as priority substances for evaluation.
V okviru Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 z dne 23. marca 1993 o oceni in nadzoru tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo obstoječe snovi [12], sta bila kadmij in kadmijev oksid opredeljena kot prednostni snovi za preveritev.
When Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 was adopted, the Commission did not set a limit value for cadmium in fertilisers but recognised the need to address this specific concern once information from the EU risk assessment on cadmium and cadmium oxide would become available.
Komisija ob sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 2003/2003 ni določila mejne vrednosti za kadmij v gnojilih, vendar je ugotovila, da je treba to posebno vprašanje obravnavati, ko bodo na voljo informacije iz ocene tveganja EU za kadmij in kadmijev oksid.
The EU Risk Assessment Report on cadmium and cadmium oxide was issued in December 2007 [13].
Poročilo Evropske unije o oceni tveganja za kadmij in kadmijev oksid je bilo objavljeno decembra 2007 [13].
Based on its conclusions, the Risk Reduction Strategy for cadmium and cadmium oxide recommended concrete measures to reduce cadmium content in foodstuffs, tobacco blends and for phosphate fertilisers taking into account the variety of conditions throughout the Union [14].
Na podlagi ugotovitev iz tega poročila so v strategiji za zmanjšanje tveganja za kadmij in kadmijev oksid priporočeni konkretni ukrepi za zmanjšanje vsebnosti kadmija v živilih, mešanicah tobaka in fosfornih gnojilih, pri čemer se upoštevajo različni pogoji po Uniji [14].
Work is ongoing at EU level to set appropriate limit values for cadmium in fertilisers taking into account a range of factors including also the variety of conditions throughout the EU, as well as the availability, geographic origin and composition of phosphates for the production of fertilisers.
Na ravni EU se trenutno določajo ustrezne mejne vrednosti za kadmij v gnojilih, pri tem pa se upoštevajo številni dejavniki, med drugim tudi različni pogoji po EU ter dostopnost, geografsko poreklo in sestava fosfatov za proizvodnjo gnojil.
The Commission intends to include appropriate limits for contaminants in fertilising materials (including cadmium) in the proposal for the revision of the Fertilisers Regulation which is planned for 2013.
Komisija namerava v predlog za spremembo Uredbe o gnojilih, načrtovan za leto 2013, vključiti ustrezne omejitve za onesnaževalce v snoveh za gnojila (vključno s kadmijem).
In the notification, reference is also made to certain studies made available in the framework of the previous requests submitted to the Commission in accordance with Article 114(4) TFEU (which were already taken into account to justify the current derogation allowing Sweden to maintain a maximum level of 100 grams of cadmium per tonne of phosphorous) and to the EU risk assessment on cadmium and cadmium oxide.
V obvestilu navajajo tudi nekatere študije, ki so bile na voljo v okviru prejšnjih zahtevkov, predloženih Komisiji v skladu s členom 114(4) PDEU (že upoštevanih pri utemeljitvi trenutnega odstopanja, ki Švedski dovoljuje, da ohranja največjo dovoljeno raven 100 gramov kadmija na tono fosforja), ter oceno tveganja EU za kadmij in kadmijev oksid.
It is, therefore, likely that aquatic organisms in Swedish waters are in general more sensitive to cadmium compared to waters in central and southern Europe.
Zato je verjetno, da so vodni organizmi v švedskih vodah na splošno bolj občutljivi na kadmij kot v vodah Srednje in Južne Evrope.
Results of monitoring programmes in Swedish surface waters in 2006 and 2009 show that about 1 % of the lakes and 7 % of the coastal waters show higher cadmium concentrations than the PNEC values.
Rezultati programov spremljanja stanja v švedskih površinskih vodah v letih 2006 in 2009 kažejo, da ima približno 1 % jezer in 7 % obalnih voda višjo koncentracijo kadmija od vrednosti predvidene koncentracije brez učinka.
A tendency of increasing effects on the immune system in fish (eelpout) during the last years seems to correlate with increasing concentrations of cadmium in fish.
Zaznani naraščajoči učinki na imunski sistem rib (Esmarkova ogorčica) v zadnjih letih se zdijo povezani z vedno večjimi koncentracijami kadmija v ribah.
A further report has been produced in 2011 with the aim to describe future trends of cadmium in arable soils and crops to estimate concentrations in 100 years and results have been used in a worst case modelling to estimate the risk to aquatic organisms inhabiting waters close to fields fertilised during 100 years ahead.
Leta 2011 je bilo pripravljeno še eno poročilo, katerega cilj je opisati prihodnje gibanje kadmija v obdelovalnih zemljiščih in poljščinah ter oceniti, kakšne bodo koncentracije kadmija čez 100 let, rezultati tega poročila pa so bili uporabljeni za oblikovanje najslabšega scenarija, da se oceni tveganje za vodne organizme, ki živijo v vodah blizu gnojenih polj, za 100 let naprej.
The Swedish authorities conclude in their assessment that there might be an increased risk for aquatic organisms living in extremely soft waters (below hardness 5 mg CaCO3/l) in the longer term.
Švedski organi v svoji oceni ugotavljajo, da bi se tveganje za vodne organizme v zelo mehki vodi (s trdoto pod 5 mg CaCO3/l) dolgoročno lahko povečalo.
But this is only likely in small brooks with low dilution of the drainage water from the agricultural soil.
Vendar je to verjetno le v manjših potokih z nizko razredčitvijo odpadnih voda s kmetijskih zemljišč.
Due to the complexity of the relations between soil cadmium inputs via phosphate fertilisers, possible soil accumulation and risks to the environment, the Commission requested the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) for an opinion on the overall quality of the Swedish risk assessment, any significant deficiencies, the appropriateness of the scenarios studied and the assumptions made, as well as the reliability and validity of the conclusions concerning the identified risks for the environment.
Komisija je glede na kompleksnost razmerja med vnosom kadmija v tla prek fosfornih gnojil, morebitnim kopičenjem v tleh in tveganjem za okolje prosila Znanstveni odbor za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja (ZOZOT) za mnenje o splošni kakovosti švedske ocene tveganja, morebitnih pomembnih pomanjkljivostih, primernosti obravnavanih scenarijev in predpostavk ter zanesljivosti in veljavnosti sklepov v zvezi z ugotovljenimi tveganji za okolje.
SCHER adopted its opinion on 27 February 2012 [15].
ZOZOT je mnenje o tem sprejel 27. februarja 2012 [15].
As already presented in Decision 2012/230/EU, SCHER concluded that the risk assessment report prepared by the Swedish authorities is of good scientific quality and that in general the scenarios studied are appropriate and most parameter values used in the scenarios are acceptable.
Ugotovil je, kot je bilo že predstavljeno v Sklepu 2012/230/EU, da je poročilo o oceni tveganja švedskih organov z znanstvenega vidika kakovostno, da so obravnavani scenariji na splošno primerni in da je večina uporabljenih vrednosti parametrov sprejemljiva.
However, SCHER considered that a number of statements and/or assumptions in the report were not supported by sufficient evidence and that for some scenarios rather worst case conditions were used.
Vendar ZOZOT meni, da več trditev in/ali predpostavk v poročilu ni utemeljenih z zadostnimi dokazi ter da so bili za nekatere scenarije uporabljeni najslabši možni pogoji.
SCHER considered that the assumptions proposed by the Swedish authorities to predict cadmium concentration in soft water could lead to an over-estimation of the risks and, consequently, did not support the results presented by the Swedish authorities for brooks, which is the only environmental compartment for which the Swedish authorities had identified risks.
ZOZOT meni, da bi lahko predpostavke, s katerimi so švedski organi napovedali koncentracijo kadmija v mehki vodi, vodile do prekomerne ocene tveganja in zato ne podpirajo rezultatov, ki so jih švedski organi predstavili za potoke, ki so edini del okolja, za katerega so ugotovili tveganje.
Overall, SCHER did not consider the assumptions made in the Swedish report as appropriate for calculating risk in the Swedish environment.
ZOZOT na splošno ni bil mnenja, da so predpostavke iz švedskega poročila primerne za izračun tveganja za švedsko okolje.
None the less, SCHER recalled the earlier assessment of CSTEE in 2002, which estimated that cadmium concentrations in soil are expected not to increase in most European soils at a limit of 46 mg Cd/kg P. Although not being new scientific evidence, SCHER confirmed that such estimate is still defendable including for Swedish agricultural soils and noted that the derivation was based on a ‘stand-still principle’, not on a risk assessment as performed by the Swedish authorities in their current justification.
Ne glede na to je ZOZOT opozoril na prejšnjo oceno Znanstvenega odbora za strupenost, strupenost za ekosisteme in okolje iz leta 2002, v kateri je navedeno, da koncentracije kadmija v tleh v večini evropskih držav ne bodo presegle 46 mg Cd/kg P. Čeprav to niso nova znanstvena spoznanja, je ZOZOT potrdil, da takšna ocena še vedno upravičeno velja tudi za švedska kmetijska zemljišča, in ugotovil, da je odstopanje temeljilo na načelu mirovanja, ne pa na oceni tveganja, ki so jo opravili švedski organi v sedanji utemeljitvi.
In their letter of 2 July 2012, the Swedish authorities have not provided further clarification that would address the weak points identified by SCHER with regard to the possible risks to the environment.
Švedski organi v dopisu z dne 2. julija 2012 niso predložili dodatnih pojasnil, v katerih bi obravnavali pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je opredelil ZOZOT, glede morebitnega tveganja za okolje.
Noting that the opinion of CSTEE in 2002 predates the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003, the Commission, therefore, concludes that the Swedish authorities have not demonstrated that there is a risk to the environment based on new scientific evidence on grounds of a problem specific to Sweden arising after the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003.
Ker je bilo mnenje Znanstvenega odbora za strupenost, strupenost za ekosisteme in okolje iz leta 2002 sprejeto pred Uredbo (ES) št. 2003/2003, Komisija ugotavlja, da švedski organi niso dokazali, da obstaja tveganje za okolje na podlagi novih znanstvenih spoznanj zaradi problema, ki je specifičen za Švedsko in je nastal po sprejetju Uredbe (ES) št. 2003/2003.
In their letter of 2 July 2012, the Swedish authorities argued that the notion of ‘protection of the environment’ in Article 114(5) TFEU covers health aspects and that an examination of the Swedish notification should, therefore, include arguments relating to the health aspects.
Švedski organi so v svojem dopisu z dne 2. julija 2012 trdili, da izraz „varstvo okolja“ iz člena 114(5) PDEU obsega zdravstvene vidike in da bi bilo treba v proučitev švedske priglasitve zato vključiti argumente v zvezi z zdravstvenimi vidiki.
Without prejudice to the correct legal interpretation of Article 114(5), the Commission extended its analysis to the assessment of possible risks posed by cadmium in fertilisers to the Swedish population via the environment, i.e. notably through dietary intake.
Komisija je ne glede na pravilno pravno razlago člena 114(5) svojo analizo razširila tudi na oceno morebitnega tveganja, ki ga predstavlja kadmij v gnojilih za prebivalstvo Švedske prek okolja, tj. zlasti z zaužitjem s hrano.
In their justification, the Swedish authorities identify health-related grounds for further reducing cadmium exposure amongst the population in Sweden, such as a high frequency of osteoporosis, increased cases of brittle bones and bone fractures, impacts on the functioning of kidneys in parts of the population where cadmium content exceed 1 mg/g creatinine, as well as risks for sensitive groups of the population (diabetics and people suffering from iron deficiency, both groups being of high proportion in Sweden).
Švedski organi v svoji utemeljitvi navajajo zdravstvene razloge za nadaljnje zmanjšanje izpostavljenosti kadmiju med prebivalstvom na Švedskem, kot so pogostost osteoporoze, povečano število primerov krhkih kosti in zlomov kosti, vplivi na delovanje ledvic pri tistem delu prebivalstva, pri katerem vsebnost kadmija presega 1 mg/g kreatinina, ter tveganja za občutljive skupine prebivalstva (sladkorne bolnike in ljudi, ki trpijo zaradi pomanjkanja železa, obojih je na Švedskem veliko).