natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The applicant claimed that it did not export the product concerned to the Union during the period of investigation, i.e. the period from 1 October 1998 to 30 September 1999 (‘the original investigation period’).
Vložnik je trdil, da v obdobju preiskave, tj. od 1. oktobra 1998 do 30. septembra 1999 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje prvotne preiskave), ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
Furthermore, the applicant claimed that it was not related to any of the exporting producers of the product concerned which are subject to the abovementioned anti-dumping measures.
Poleg tega je vložnik trdil, da ni bil povezan z nobenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom zadevnega izdelka, za katerega se uporabljajo zgoraj navedeni protidampinški ukrepi.
The applicant further claimed that it had begun exporting the product concerned to the Union after the end of the original investigation period.
Vložnik je prav tako trdil, da je začel izvažati zadevni izdelek v Unijo po koncu obdobja prvotne preiskave.
The Commission examined the prima facie evidence submitted by the applicant and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je preučila prima facie dokaze, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in ocenila, da so zadostni za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated, by Regulation (EU) No 653/2012 [5], a review of Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 with regard to the applicant.
Po tem, ko se je Komisija posvetovala s svetovalnim odborom in zadevni industriji Unije dala možnost za pripombe, je z Uredbo (EU) št. 653/2012 [5] začela pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 192/2007 v zvezi z vložnikom.
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 653/2012, the anti-dumping duty of certain polyethylene terephthalate imposed by Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 was repealed with regard to imports of the product concerned produced and sold for export to the Union by the applicant.
V skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 653/2012 je bila protidampinška dajatev, uvedena za nekatere vrste polietilen tereftalata z Uredbo (ES) št. 192/2007, razveljavljena za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je vložnik proizvajal in prodajal za izvoz v Unijo.
The product concerned is polyethylene terephthalate (‘PET’) having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to International Organisation for Standardisation standard 1628-5, originating in Taiwan, currently falling within CN code 39076020 (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je polietilen tereftalat (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PET) z viskoznim številom 78 ml/g ali več, v skladu s standardom 1628-5 Mednarodne organizacije za standardizacijo, s poreklom iz Tajvana, trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN 39076020 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek).
The Commission sought to verify all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of the new exporter status and dumping and verification visits were carried out at the premises of the applicant in Taiwan.
Komisija si je prizadevala za preveritev vseh informacij, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev statusa novega izvoznika in dampinga, opravljeni pa so bili tudi preveritveni obiski v prostorih vložnika v Tajvanu.
The review investigation period of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2011 to 30 June 2012 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘the RIP’).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 30. junija 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP).
The investigation confirmed that the company had not exported the product concerned during the original investigation period and that it had started to export it to the Union after that period.
S preiskavo je bilo potrjeno, da družba v obdobju prvotne preiskave ni izvažala zadevnega izdelka in da ga je v Unijo začela izvažati po navedenem obdobju.
While quantities exported were limited, they were nevertheless found sufficient to establish a reliable dumping margin.
Kljub temu, da so bile izvožene količine omejene, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zadostovale za določitev zanesljive stopnje dampinga.
They followed a pattern, in terms of shipment size and turnover per client, which was comparable to the behaviour of the applicant on third-country markets.
Glede obsega pošiljk in prometa na stranko je bil izvoz primerljiv s trgovanjem vložnika na trgih tretjih držav.
As concerns the other conditions for the recognition of a new exporter status, the company was able to demonstrate that it did not have any links, direct or indirect, with any of the Taiwanese exporting producers subject to the anti-dumping measures in force with regard to the product concerned.
Glede ostalih pogojev za priznanje statusa novega izvoznika je družba lahko dokazala, da ni neposredno ali posredno povezana z nobenim tajvanskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katerega se v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom uporabljajo veljavni protidampinški ukrepi.
Accordingly, it is confirmed that the company should be considered a ‘new exporter’ in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation and thus an individual margin should be determined for it.
Zato se potrdi, da bi bilo družbo treba šteti za „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe in bi ji zato bilo treba določiti individualno stopnjo dajatve.
The applicant produces the product concerned and sells it domestically and on export markets.
Vložnik proizvaja zadevni izdelek in ga prodaja na domačem ter izvoznem trgu.
The applicant sells directly to all markets.
Vložnik prodaja neposredno na vse trge.
The Commission established that the applicant exported a single product type to the Union and that the same product type was sold domestically by the applicant in overall representative volumes.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je vložnik v Unijo izvažal eno samo vrsto izdelka in da je isto vrsto izdelka prodajal na domačem trgu v celotnem reprezentativnem obsegu.
The Commission also examined whether the sales of the product concerned sold domestically in representative quantities could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prav tako preučila, ali je mogoče za domačo prodajo zadevnega izdelka v reprezentativnih količinah šteti, da se je izvajala v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
That was done by establishing the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers.
To je bilo opravljeno tako, da je bil ugotovljen delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam.
As there were sufficient sales in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Ker je bil v običajnem poteku trgovine dosežen zadosten obseg prodaje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.
Therefore, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
Torej je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, tj. na podlagi plačanih ali plačljivih izvoznih cen.
Adjustments for insurance, handling, loading and ancillary expenses and credit costs were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by verified evidence.
Prilagoditve za stroške zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške, stroške natovarjanja in druge dodatne stroške ter posojila so bile odobrene v vseh primerih, ko je bilo ugotovljeno, da so smiselne, točne in podprte s preverjenimi dokazi.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average of prices of all exports transactions to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtanim povprečjem cen vseh izvoznih transakcij v Unijo.
As there were a limited number of exports to the Union, the individual export prices to the Union were also compared to the weighted average normal value of the months in which each export occurred.
Ker je bila količina izvoza v Unijo omejena, so se posamezne izvozne cene v Unijo primerjale tudi s tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo za mesece, v katerih je potekal posamezni izvoz.
In both cases, those comparisons showed the existence of a de minimis dumping for the applicant that exported to the Union in the RIP.
V obeh primerih je ta primerjava pokazala obstoj dampinga na stopnji de minimis za vložnika, ki je izvažal v Unijo v OPP.
D. AMENDMENT OF MEASURES BEING REVIEWED
D. SPREMEMBA UKREPOV V PREGLEDU
The dumping margin with regard to the applicant, established for the RIP, was at de minimis level.
Stopnja dampinga, ugotovljena za vložnika v OPP, je bila na stopnji de minimis.
It is therefore proposed that a duty of 0 EUR/tonne which is based on the de minimis dumping margin be imposed and that Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 be amended accordingly.
Zato se predlaga, da se uvede dajatev v višini 0 EUR/tono, ki temelji na stopnji dampinga de minimis, in da se Uredba (ES) št. 192/2007 ustrezno spremeni.
In the light of these findings, the registration of imports imposed by Regulation (EU) No 653/2012 should cease without any retroactive levying of the anti-dumping duties.
Glede na te ugotovitve bi bilo treba ustaviti registracijo uvoza, uvedenega z Uredbo (EU) št. 653/2012, brez retroaktivnega obračunavanja protidampinških dajatev.
F. DISCLOSURE AND DURATION OF THE MEASURES
F. RAZKRITJE IN TRAJANJE UKREPOV
The parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose an anti-dumping duty of 0 EUR/tonne on imports of the product concerned from the applicant and to amend Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 accordingly.
Zadevne strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bila predvidena uvedba protidampinške dajatve v višini 0 EUR/tono na uvoz zadevnega izdelka vložnika in o ustrezni spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 192/2007.
In Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 192/2007, the following shall be inserted into the table under producers in Taiwan:
V člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 192/2007 se v preglednico med proizvajalce iz Tajvana vstavi naslednje:
Anti-dumping duty (EUR/tonne)
Protidampinška dajatev (EUR/tono)
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports of the product concerned originating in Taiwan produced by Lealea Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Tajvana, ki ga proizvaja družba Lealea Enterprise Co., Ltd.
OL L 59, 27.2.2007, p. 59.
UL L 59, 27.2.2007, str. 59.
OJ L 188, 18.7.2012, p. 8.
UL L 188, 18.7.2012, str. 8.
Council Regulation (EU) No 296/2013
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 296/2013
Having regard to the joint proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and of the European Commission,
ob upoštevanju skupnih predlogov Visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ter Evropske komisije,
Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 [1] gives effect to measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/800/CFSP of 22 December 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea [2].
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 329/2007 [1] uveljavlja ukrepe iz Sklepa Sveta 2010/800/SZVP z dne 22. decembra 2010 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Demokratični ljudski republiki Koreji [2].
On 18 February 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/88/CFSP [3] amending Decision 2010/800/CFSP which provided for additional restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (‘North Korea’) by giving effect to the additional measures required by United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolution 2087 (2013) and to further autonomous measures of the Union.
Svet je 18. februarja 2013 sprejel Sklep 2013/88/SZVP [3] o spremembi Sklepa 2010/800/SZVP, ki je določil dodatne omejevalne ukrepe proti Demokratični ljudski republiki Koreji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Severna Koreja) s tem, da je uveljavil dodatne ukrepe, ki so bili zahtevani na podlagi Resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov (VSZN) 2087 (2013), in dodatne samostojne ukrepe Unije.
Decision 2013/88/CFSP includes an additional criterion for autonomous designation by the Union of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures, namely persons involved in, including through the provision of financial services, the supply to or from North Korea of arms and related material of all types, or of items, materials, equipment, goods and technology which could contribute to North Korea’s nuclear-related, other weapons of mass destruction related or ballistic missile-related programmes.
Sklep 2013/88/SZVP vključuje dodatno merilo, na podlagi katerega Unija lahko samostojno določa osebe in subjekte, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, in sicer za osebe, ki se ukvarjajo, vključno z zagotavljanjem finančnih storitev, z dobavo orožja in sorodnega materiala vseh vrst ali predmetov, materialov, opreme, blaga in tehnologije v Severno Korejo ali iz nje, ki bi lahko prispevali k programom Severne Koreje, povezanim z jedrskim orožjem, drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje ali balističnimi izstrelki.
Furthermore, Decision 2013/88/CFSP prohibits the sale, supply, transfer to North Korea of certain other goods relevant to North Korea’s weapons of mass destruction-related programmes, in particular its ballistic-missile sector, especially certain types of aluminium.
Poleg tega Sklep 2013/88/SZVP prepovedujejo prodajo, dobavo ali prenos v Severno Korejo nekaterega drugega blaga, ki se uporablja v programih Severne Koreje, povezanih z orožjem za množično uničevanje, zlasti v sektorju balističnih izstrelkov, predvsem nekaterih vrst aluminija.
Decision 2013/88/CFSP also prohibits the sale, purchase, transportation or brokering of gold, precious metals and diamonds to, from or for the Government of North Korea and the delivery of newly printed or minted or unissued North Korean denominated banknotes and coinage to or for the benefit of the Central Bank of North Korea, as well as the sale or purchase of North Korean public or public-guaranteed bonds.
Sklep 2013/88/SZVP prav tako prepoveduje prodajo zlata, plemenitih kovin in diamantov vladi Severne Koreje ali nakup le-teh od nje in prevoz ali posredovanje zlata, plemenitih kovin in diamantov v njenem imenu ter dostavo na novo natisnjenih ali kovanih ali neizdanih severnokorejskih bankovcev in kovancev Centralni banki Severne Koreje ali v njeno korist, ter prodajo ali nakup severnokorejskih državnih obveznic ali obveznic z jamstvom države.
Furthermore, Decision 2013/88/CFSP clarifies that where the Council has provided for a prohibition on financial services, this includes the provision of insurance and reinsurance services.
Poleg tega je bilo s Sklepom 2013/88/SZVP pojasnjeno, da je Svet s prepovedjo finančnih storitev prepovedal tudi zagotavljanje zavarovalnih in pozavarovalnih storitev.
This necessitates a technical amendment to Regulation (EC) No 329/2007.
Zato je potrebna tehnična sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 329/2007.
Decision 2013/88/CFSP prohibits the opening of new branches, subsidiaries, or representative offices of North Korean banks in the territories of Member States, the establishment of new joint ventures, or the taking of an ownership interest by the North Korean banks, including the Central Bank of North Korea, with banks in the jurisdiction of Member States.
Sklep 2013/88/SZVP prepoveduje odprtje novih podružnic, hčerinskih družb ali predstavništev severnokorejskih bank na ozemljih držav članic, ustanavljanje novih skupnih podjetij ali lastniško udeležbo severnokorejskih bank, vključno s Centralno banko Severne Koreje, z bankami pod sodno pristojnostjo držav članic.
Moreover, in line with paragraph 13 of UN Security Council Resolution 2087 (2013), it is necessary to establish that no claims in connection with the performance of any contract or transaction affected by those measures shall be granted to designated persons or entities or any other person or entity in North Korea.
Poleg tega je treba v skladu z odstavkom 13 Resolucije Varnostnega sveta ZN 2087 (2013) določiti, da se osebam ali subjektom, uvrščenim na seznam, ali kateri koli drugi osebi ali subjektu v Severni Koreji ne odobri noben zahtevek v zvezi s pogodbami ali drugimi pravnimi posli, katerih izvedba je bila ovirana zaradi teh ukrepov.
Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 329/2007 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
to sell, supply, transfer or export, directly or indirectly, the goods and technology, including software, listed in Annexes I, Ia and Ib, whether or not originating in the Union, to any natural or legal person, entity or body in, or for use in North Korea;
neposredno ali posredno prodajati, dobavljati, prenašati ali izvažati blago in tehnologijo, vključno s programsko opremo iz Prilog I, Ia in Ib, ne glede na to, ali izvira iz Unije, vsem fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, subjektom ali organom v Severni Koreji ali za uporabo v tej državi;
to participate, knowingly and intentionally, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the prohibition referred to in point (a).
zavestno in namerno sodelovati v dejavnostih, katerih cilj ali učinek je izogib prepovedi iz točke (a).
Annex I shall include all items, materials, equipment, goods and technology, including software, which are dual-use items or technology as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual- use items.
V Prilogo I se vključijo vsi izdelki, materiali, oprema, blago in tehnologija, vključno s programsko opremo, ki glede na opredelitve iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 428/2009 z dne 5. maja 2009 o vzpostavitvi režima Skupnosti za nadzor izvoza, prenosa, posredovanja in tranzita blaga z dvojno rabo sodijo med blago ali tehnologijo z dvojno rabo.
Annex Ia shall include other items, materials, equipment, goods and technology which could contribute to North Korea’s nuclear-related, other weapons of mass destruction-related or ballistic missile-related programmes.
V Prilogo Ia se vključijo nekateri drugi izdelki, materiali, oprema, blago in tehnologija, ki bi Severni Koreji lahko pomagali pri njenih programih, povezanih z jedrskim orožjem, drugim orožjem za množično uničevanje ali balističnimi izstrelki.
Annex Ib shall include certain key components for the ballistic-missile sector.
V Prilogo Ib se vključijo nekatere ključne komponente sektorja balističnih izstrelkov.
It shall be prohibited to purchase, import or transport the goods and technology listed in Annexes I, Ia and Ib from North Korea, whether or not the item concerned originates in North Korea.
Blago in tehnologijo iz Prilog I, Ia in Ib je prepovedano kupovati v Severni Koreji, ju uvažati ali odpeljati iz nje ne glede na to, ali zadevni izdelek izvira iz Severne Koreje ali ne.
Article 3(1) is amended as follows:
člen 3(1) se spremeni:
to provide, directly or indirectly, technical assistance and brokering services related to goods and technology listed in the EU Common List of Military Equipment or in Annexes I, Ia and Ib, and to the provision, manufacture, maintenance and use of goods listed in the EU Common List of Military Equipment or in Annexes I, Ia and Ib to any natural or legal person, entity or body in, or for use in, North Korea;
neposredno ali posredno zagotavljati tehnično pomoč in storitve posredovanja za blago in tehnologijo s Skupnega seznama vojaškega blaga EU ali iz Prilog I, Ia in Ib ali pri zagotavljanju, proizvodnji, vzdrževanju in uporabi blaga s Skupnega seznama vojaškega blaga EU ali iz Prilog I, Ia in Ib kateri koli fizični ali pravni osebi, subjektu ali organu v Severni Koreji ali za uporabo v tej državi;
to provide, directly or indirectly, financing or financial assistance related to goods and technology listed in the EU Common List of Military Equipment or in Annexes I, Ia and Ib, including in particular grants, loans and export credit insurance, as well as insurance and reinsurance, for any sale, supply, transfer or export of such items, or for any provision of related technical assistance to any natural or legal person, entity or body in, or for use in, North Korea;’;
neposredno ali posredno zagotavljati financiranje ali finančno pomoč za blago in tehnologijo s Skupnega seznama vojaškega blaga Evropske unije ali iz Prilog I, Ia in Ib, med drugim zlasti subvencije, posojila in izvozna kreditna zavarovanja, pa tudi zavarovanja in pozavarovanja, pri nakupu, dobavi, prenosu ali izvozu tovrstnega blaga ali pri zagotavljanju pripadajoče tehnične pomoči kateri koli fizični ali pravni osebi, subjektu ali organu v Severni Koreji ali za uporabo v tej državi;“
in points (c) and (d), the words ‘Annexes I and Ia’ are replaced by the words ‘Annexes I, Ia and Ib’;
v točkah (c) in (d) se besedilo: „prilog I in Ia“ nadomesti z besedilom: „prilog I, Ia in Ib“;
in the first subparagraph of Article 3a(1), the words ‘Annexes I and Ia’ are replaced by the words ‘Annexes I, Ia and Ib’;
v prvem pododstavku člena 3a(1) se besedilo „prilog I in Ia“ nadomesti z besedilom „prilog I, Ia in Ib“;
the following articles are inserted:
vstavita se naslednja člena:
to sell, supply, transfer or export, directly or indirectly, gold, precious metals and diamonds, as listed in Annex VII, whether or not originating in the Union, to or for the Government of North Korea, its public bodies, corporations and agencies, the Central Bank of North Korea and any person, entity or body acting on their behalf or at their direction, or any entity or body owned or controlled by them;
neposredno ali posredno prodajati, dobavljati, prenašati ali izvažati zlato, plemenite kovine in diamante, navedene v Prilogi VII, ne glede na to, ali izvirajo iz Unije ali ne, in sicer vladi Severne Koreje, organom javne uprave Severne Koreje, korporacijam in agencijam, Centralni banki Severne Koreje, vsaki osebi, subjektu ali organu, ki deluje v njihovem imenu ali po njihovih navodilih, ali ki deluje v imenu ali po navodilih subjekta ali organa, ki je v njihovi lasti ali pod njihovim nadzorom;
to purchase, import or transport, directly or indirectly, gold, precious metals and diamonds, as listed in Annex VII, whether or not originating in North Korea, from the Government of North Korea, its public bodies, corporations and agencies, the Central Bank of North Korea and any person, entity or body acting on their behalf or at their direction, or any entity or body owned or controlled by them;
neposredno ali posredno kupiti, uvoziti ali prevažati zlato, plemenite kovine in diamante, navedene v Prilogi VII, ne glede na to ali je poreklo zadevnega predmeta Severna Koreja, severnokorejska vlada, organi severnokorejske javne uprave, korporacije in agencije, Centralna banka Severne Koreje in katera koli oseba, subjekt ali organ, ki deluje v njihovem imenu ali po njihovih navodilih, ali ki deluje v imenu ali po navodilih subjekta ali organa, ki je v njihovi lasti ali pod njihovim nadzorom;
to provide, directly or indirectly, technical assistance or brokering services, financing or financial assistance, related to the goods referred to in points (a) and (b), to the Government of North Korea, its public bodies, corporations and agencies, the Central Bank of North Korea and any person, entity or body acting on their behalf or at their direction, or any entity or body owned or controlled by them.
neposredno ali posredno zagotavljati tehnično pomoč ali storitve posredovanja, financiranje ali finančno pomoč, povezano z blagom iz točk (a) in (b), vladi Severne Koreje, njenim javnim organom, korporacijam in agencijam, Centralni banki Severne Koreje in vsem osebam, subjektom ali organom, ki delujejo v njihovem imenu ali po njihovih navodilih, ali kateremu koli subjektu ali organu, ki je v njihovi lasti ali pod njihovim nadzorom.