natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
or [II.2.7. meet the requirements of Chapter A(I) of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 and are destined for a Member State which benefits, for all or part of its territory, from the provisions laid down in point (b) or (c) of Chapter A(I) of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 and the donor animals comply regarding scrapie with the guarantees provided for by the national scrapie control program referred to in that point and with the guarantees (7) requested by the Member State of destination;]
ali [II.2.7. izpolnjujejo zahteve iz poglavja A(I) Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 in so namenjeni v državo članico, ki v celoti ali na delu svojega ozemlja uporablja določbe iz točke (b) ali (c) poglavja A(I) Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 in darovalke izpolnjujejo zahteve v zvezi s praskavcem, tj. z jamstvi iz nacionalnega programa za nadzor praskavca iz navedene točke in jamstvi (7), ki jih zahteva namembna država članica;]
either [II.2.11.1. approved in accordance with Article 11(2) of Directive 92/65/EEC and located in a Member State of the European Union, and the semen complies with the requirements of Directive 92/65/EEC.]
bodisi [II.2.11.1. ki so odobrena v skladu s členom 11(2) Direktive 92/65/EGS in se nahajajo v državi članici Evropske unije ter je seme v skladu z zahtevami iz Direktive 92/65/EGS.]
or [II.2.11.1. approved in accordance with Article 17(3)(b) of Directive 92/65/EEC and located in a third country or part thereof listed in Annex I to Decision 2010/472/EU, and the semen complies with the requirements set out in Part 2 of Annex II to that Decision.]’
ali [II.2.11.1. ki so odobrena v skladu s členom 17(3)(b) Direktive 92/65/EGS in se nahajajo v tretji državi ali delu tretje države iz Priloge I k Sklepu 2010/472/EU ter je seme v skladu z zahtevami iz dela 2 Priloge II k navedenemu sklepu.]“
of 19 July 2012
z dne 19. julija 2012
amending the list of ‘basic local government units’ in the Annex to Council Directive 94/80/EC laying down detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections by citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals
o spremembi seznama temeljnih lokalnih skupnosti v Prilogi k Direktivi Sveta 94/80/ES o določitvi podrobne ureditve za uresničevanje volilne pravice in pravice do kandidiranja na lokalnih volitvah državljanov Unije, ki prebivajo v državi članici, v kateri nimajo državljanstva
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 22(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 22(1) Pogodbe,
Having regard to Council Directive 94/80/EC of 19 December 1994 laying down detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections by citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals [1], and in particular Article 2(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 94/80/ES z dne 19. decembra 1994 o določitvi podrobne ureditve za uresničevanje volilne pravice in pravice do kandidiranja na lokalnih volitvah državljanov Unije, ki prebivajo v državi članici, v kateri nimajo državljanstva [1], in zlasti člena 2(2) Direktive,
Directive 94/80/EC lists in its Annex the ‘basic local government units’ which determine the scope of the Directive.
V Prilogi k Direktivi 94/80/ES so navedene „temeljne lokalne skupnosti“, ki določajo področje uporabe Direktive.
According to Article 2(2) of Directive 94/80/EC, a Member State shall notify the Commission if any local government unit referred to in the Annex to that Directive is, by virtue of a change in its domestic law, replaced by another unit or if, by virtue of such a change, any such unit is abolished or further such units are created.
V skladu s členom 2(2) Direktive 94/80/ES država članica uradno obvesti Komisijo, ali se kakršna koli temeljna lokalna skupnost, navedena v Prilogi k tej Direktivi, na podlagi spremembe v nacionalnem pravu nadomesti z drugo temeljno lokalno skupnostjo, ali če je na podlagi take spremembe ta temeljna lokalna skupnost odpravljena ali so ustanovljene nove.
Consequently, the Commission shall adapt that Annex by making appropriate substitutions, deletions or additions and that Annex so revised shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Zato Komisija prilagodi navedeno prilogo z ustreznimi nadomestitvami, črtanji ali dodajanjem, in se tako revidirana Priloga objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Denmark, Ireland, Greece, Latvia and Lithuania have informed the Commission that, following changes in their domestic legislation, the ‘basic local government units’ concerning them have been modified.
Danska, Grčija, Irska, Latvija in Litva so obvestile Komisijo, da so se na podlagi sprememb v nacionalnem pravu spremenile njihove „temeljne lokalne skupnosti“.
These laws have been formally notified to the Commission.
Komisija je bila uradno obveščena o teh zakonih.
The Annex to Directive 94/80/EC should be amended accordingly,
Prilogo k Direktivi 94/80/ES je treba ustrezno spremeniti –
The Annex to Directive 94/80/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Direktivi 94/80/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
This Decision shall enter into force on the first day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep začne veljati prvi dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels, 19 July 2012.
V Bruslju, 19. julija 2012
In the Annex to Directive 94/80/EC, the list of ‘basic local government units’ is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi k Direktivi 94/80/ES se seznam „temeljnih lokalnih skupnosti“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘ “Basic local government unit” within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of this Directive means any of the following:
„‚Temeljna lokalna skupnost‘ v smislu člena 2(1)(a) te direktive pomeni:
on the establishment of the annual priority lists for the development of network codes and guidelines for 2013
o vzpostavitvi letnega seznama prednostnih nalog za razvoj kodeksov omrežij in smernic za leto 2013
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003 [1] and Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to natural gas transmission networks and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005 [2], and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 714/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o pogojih za dostop do omrežja za čezmejne izmenjave električne energije in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1228/2003 [1] ter Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o pogojih za dostop do prenosnih omrežij zemeljskega plina in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1775/2005 [2], zlasti člena 6(1) Uredbe,
As a first step towards binding European network codes, an annual priority list identifying the areas to be included in the development of network codes has to be established by the European Commission (‘the Commission’) in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 (‘the Electricity Regulation’) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 (‘the Gas Regulation’).
Kot prvi korak pri vzpostavljanju zavezujočih evropskih kodeksov omrežij mora Evropska komisija v skladu s členom 6(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 714/2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o električni energiji) in členom 6(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o plinu) vzpostaviti letni seznam prednostnih nalog, ki opredeljuje področja, ki jih je treba vključiti v razvoj kodeksov omrežij.
In setting the priorities, the Commission has to consult the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (‘ACER’), the responsible European Network of Transmission System Operators (‘ENTSOs’) and other relevant stakeholders.
Pri določanju prednostnih nalog se mora Evropska komisija posvetovati z Agencijo za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ACER), z odgovornim Evropskim omrežjem upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ENTSO) in drugimi ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
This decision sets out the priorities as decided by the Commission based on the outcomes from the public consultation.
Ta sklep opredeljuje prednostne naloge, ki jih je na podlagi rezultatov javnih posvetovanj določila Komisija.
The European Council on 4 February 2011 set 2014 as a target for the completion of the internal market for electricity and gas.
(3) Evropski svet je 4. februarja 2011 določil leto 2014 kot skrajni rok za dokončno oblikovanje notranjega trga z električno energijo in plinom.
The Third Package is an important element in the development towards this target.
Tretji sveženj je pomemben del pri doseganju tega cilja.
However, further efforts have to be made to allow gas and electricity to flow freely across Europe.
Vendar so za omogočanje prostega pretoka plina in električne energije po Evropi potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja.
The network codes and guidelines which are foreseen by the Third Package will provide the relevant rules for this further development.
Kodeksi omrežij in smernice, ki jih predvideva tretji sveženj, bodo zagotavljali ustrezna pravila za ta nadaljnji razvoj.
For the planning of resources it is important to identify annually the key areas for the development of network codes and guidelines.
Za načrtovanje virov je pomembno letno opredeljevanje ključnih področij za razvoj kodeksov omrežij in smernic.
As soon as an area is identified as important for the first time, scoping work needs to be started in order to identify to what extent a harmonisation is needed.
Ko je področje prvič opredeljeno za pomembno, je treba začeti dela za določitev obsega, da se opredeli, v kolikšni meri je potrebno usklajevanje.
Key areas where the work on network codes and guidelines has already started will be continued and completed.
Na ključnih področjih, na katerih se je delo na kodeksih omrežij in smernicah že začelo, se bo delo nadaljevalo in končalo.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
JAVNO POSVETOVANJE
Whereas the other responses came mainly from European energy stakeholder organisations, several individual companies also participated in the public consultation.
Čeprav so bili drugi odgovori predvsem odgovori evropskih zainteresiranih organizacij za energijo, so na javnem posvetovanju sodelovala tudi nekatera posamezna podjetja.
The following were the major general comments received during the public consultation:
V nadaljevanju so naštete glavne splošne pripombe, prejete med javnim posvetovanjem:
A clear message from the public consultation was that stakeholders supported the focused approach of the Commission prioritising the work to deliver key elements that are necessary for the completion of the internal energy market by 2014 as regards the development of network codes and guidelines both for electricity and gas.
Jasno sporočilo javnega posvetovanja je bilo, da zainteresirane strani podpirajo osredotočen pristop Komisije, ki v zvezi z razvojem kodeksov omrežij in smernic za električno energijo in plin kot prednostno nalogo določa prizadevanja za doseg ključnih dejavnikov, ki so potrebni za dokončno oblikovanje notranjega energetskega trga do leta 2014.
Stakeholders are of the view that the Commission has pointed out in its consultation the most important tasks to be done for further integration of the internal energy market.
Mnenje zainteresiranih strani je, da je Komisija pri javnem posvetovanju izpostavila najpomembnejše naloge za doseganje nadaljnjega povezovanja notranjega energetskega trga.
A further key message by several stakeholders was that they would prefer to put all the issues listed in Article 8(6) of the Electricity and Gas Regulation through the FG/NC process instead of using direct comitology guidelines for the adoption of binding rules on these areas.
Nadaljnje pomembno sporočilo nekaterih zainteresiranih strani je bilo, da bi vse zadeve iz člena 8(6) uredbe o električni energiji in plinu raje obdelale s postopkom okvirnih smernic/kodeksa omrežja, kot pa uporabile neposredne smernice postopka v odboru za sprejetje zavezujočih postopkov na teh področjih.
In this context some stakeholders stressed the importance of a transparent, efficient and coherent process which guarantees early and close stakeholder and distribution system operator involvement.
V povezavi s tem so nekatere zainteresirane strani poudarile pomembnost preglednega, učinkovitega in usklajenega postopka, ki zagotavlja zgodnje in tesno sodelovanje zainteresiranih strani in upravljavca distribucijskega sistema.
It was also mentioned that the necessary timeslots for the development of robust network codes, with sufficient time for consultation of involved actors, need to be given.
Omenjeno je bilo tudi, da so potrebni časovni roki za oblikovanje zanesljivih kodeksov omrežij, ki omogočajo dovolj časa za posvetovanje udeleženih akterjev.
Several stakeholders requested that draft proposals for the framework guidelines and network codes should be accompanied by the relevant Impact Assessment outlining the main policy options and underpinning by their comprehensive cost-benefit analysis.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so zahtevale, da bi osnutke predloga za okvirne smernice in kodekse omrežij morala spremljati ustrezna ocena učinka, v kateri so opisane glavne možnosti politike in ki je podprta z obsežno analizo stroškov.
The Impact Assessment should furthermore be subject to a separate public consultation.
Ocena učinka bi poleg tega morala biti predmet ločenega javnega posvetovanja.
Drafting the impact assessment after the end of a public consultation, as in the case of the ‘pilot code’, would not be acceptable.
Priprava ocene učinka po koncu javnega posvetovanja, kot se je to zgodilo v primeru „pilotnega kodeksa“, bi bila nesprejemljiva.
Several stakeholders mentioned in their response that the scope of some network codes is too wide and does not restrict itself to the scope given by the Regulations, i.e. cross-border issues.
Več zainteresiranih strani je v svojem odgovoru omenilo, da je obseg nekaterih kodeksov omrežij preširok in ni omejen na področje uporabe, ki ga navajajo uredbe, tj. čezmejna vprašanja.
In this context it was also stressed that network codes should not be over-prescriptive.
V povezavi s tem je bilo poudarjeno tudi, da kodeksi omrežij ne bi smeli biti preveč predpisujoči.
The following were the major comments concerning the annual priority list regarding electricity network rules received during the public consultation:
V nadaljevanju so naštete glavne pripombe glede letnega seznama prednostnih nalog v zvezi s pravili električnega omrežja, prejetega med javnim posvetovanjem.
Several stakeholders were concerned about possible inconsistencies between network codes.
Številne zainteresirane strani so bile zaskrbljene zaradi morebitnih neskladnosti med kodeksi omrežij.
Some proposed to develop only one network code in line with one framework guideline and some emphasised that at least some network codes need to be developed together such as the network codes on generator connection and demand connection, the network codes on grid connection and system operation, the network code on connection and congestion management and the ‘governance’ comitology guideline.
Nekatere so predlagale oblikovanje le enega kodeksa omrežja v skladu z enimi okvirnimi smernicami, druge pa so poudarile, da je vsaj nekaj kodeksov omrežij treba oblikovati skupaj, kot so kodeksi omrežij za povezavo z generatorjem in povezovanje zahtev, kodeksi omrežij za priključitev na omrežje in delovanje sistema, kodeks omrežja za upravljanje povezav in prezasedenosti ter smernice za „upravljanje“ postopka v odboru.
Several stakeholders support the development of rules regarding harmonised transmission tariff structures and/or investment incentives.
Številne zainteresirane strani podpirajo razvoj pravil o usklajenih tarifnih strukturah za prenos in/ali spodbude za naložbe.
ENTSO-E was of the opinion that the issue of tariff structures and the issue of investment incentives are largely unrelated and recommended therefore addressing them independently while giving priority to rules regarding investment incentives.
ENTSO-E je menil, da sta vprašanje o tarifnih strukturah in vprašanje o spodbudah za naložbe večinoma nepovezani in priporočil, da se ju rešuje ločeno, pri tem pa naj imajo prednost pravila o spodbudah za naložbe.
ENTSO-E expressed the view that rules for longer-term (forward) capacity allocation and rules on High-voltage direct current transmission system connection need to be included into the annual priority list for 2013.
ENTSO-E je izrazil mnenje, da morajo v letni seznam prednostnih nalog za leto 2013 biti vključena tudi pravila za dolgoročno (terminsko) dodeljevanje zmogljivosti in pravila o povezavi prenosnega sistema visokonapetostnega neposrednega toka.
The following were the major comments concerning the annual priority list regarding gas network rules received during the public consultation:
V nadaljevanju so naštete glavne pripombe glede letnega seznama prednostnih nalog v zvezi s pravili plinskega omrežja, prejetega med javnim posvetovanjem.
A key message by stakeholders was that they want to have harmonised rules regarding transmission tariff structures but would prefer to develop the rules through the network code process instead of using direct comitology guidelines.
Ključno sporočilo zainteresiranih strani je bilo, da želijo uskladiti pravila o tarifnih strukturah za prenos, vendar bi pravila raje oblikovale s pomočjo postopka kodeksov omrežij in ne z uporabo neposrednih smernic postopka v odboru.
Several stakeholders proposed to set a narrow scope.
Številne zainteresirane strani so predlagale določitev ozkega področja uporabe.
Some stakeholders raised concerns about the consistency between the network code on capacity allocation and the rules on congestion management procedures and therefore recommended to synchronise the comitology process for both topics.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani skrbi doslednost med kodeksi omrežij o dodeljevanju zmogljivosti in pravilih o postopkih upravljanja prezasedenosti, zato so predlagale uskladitev postopka v odboru za obe temi.
The following were the major comments concerning possible scope and need of network codes and guidelines beyond 2013 regarding electricity network rules received during the public consultation: some stakeholders were of the view Third Party Access rules should be developed before those related to energy efficiency regarding electricity networks as they could provide a level playing field for operators in the internal market.
V nadaljevanju so naštete glavne pripombe glede morebitnega področja uporabe in potrebe po kodeksih omrežij in smernicah po letu 2013 v zvezi s pravili električnega omrežja, ki so bila prejeta med javnim posvetovanjem: nekatere zainteresirane strani so menile, da bi morala biti pravila dostopa tretjih strani oblikovana pred pravili, ki so povezana z energetsko učinkovitostjo električnih omrežij, saj bi lahko omogočila enake konkurenčne pogoje za upravljavce na notranjem trgu.
The following were the major comments concerning possible scope and need of network codes and guidelines beyond 2013 regarding gas network rules received during the public consultation:
V nadaljevanju so naštete glavne pripombe glede morebitnega področja uporabe in potrebe po kodeksih omrežij in smernicah po letu 2013 v zvezi s pravili plinskega omrežja, ki so bila prejeta med javnim posvetovanjem:
Several stakeholders are asking to address the issue of incremental capacity and propose that rules could be developed in a network code on Third Party Access; others also want to have it addressed in the development of rules on harmonised transmission tariff structures.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so zaprosile za reševanje vprašanja o razširitvi zmogljivosti in predlagale, da se oblikujejo pravila znotraj kodeksa omrežja glede dostopa tretjih strani, nekatere pa želijo vprašanje rešiti z oblikovanjem pravil o usklajenih tarifnih strukturah za prenos.
Several stakeholders were of the opinion that rules for trading related to technical and operational provisions of network access services and system balance are already covered by the rules on capacity allocation and balancing.
Številne zainteresirane strani so bile mnenja, da so pravila za trgovanje, povezana s tehničnimi in operativnimi predpisi za storitve za dostop do omrežja in uravnoteženostjo sistema, že vključena v pravila o dodeljevanju zmogljivosti in uravnoteženosti.
Still stakeholders called for the development of trading rules focusing on rules to foster a liquid market on secondary capacity trading.
Vendar so zainteresirane strani vseeno pozvale k razvoju trgovinskih pravil za spodbujanje likvidnega trga za trgovanje s sekundarno zmogljivostjo.
Concerning ‘network security and reliability rules’ the opinion was given that in case this issue needs to be tackled it would be more appropriate to do so in the framework of Regulation (EU) No 994/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] concerning measures to safeguard security of gas supply.
Glede „pravil o varnosti in zanesljivosti omrežja“ je bilo izraženo mnenje, da bi bilo v primeru, če bi se bilo treba s tem vprašanjem spopasti, ustreznejše to storiti v okviru Uredbe (EU) št. 994/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] o ukrepih za zagotavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe s plinom.
Some stakeholders raised concerns whether the development of network codes and guidelines regarding operational procedures in an emergency would have any benefit and were questioning the harmonisation of these provisions.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so izrazile pomislek, ali bo oblikovanje kodeksov omrežij in smernic glede operativnih postopkov v izrednih razmerah sploh koristilo, podvomile pa so tudi v usklajevanje teh določb.
Having regard to the responses of stakeholders the Commission prioritises the work to deliver key elements that are necessary for the completion of the internal energy market by 2014,
Ob upoštevanju odgovorov zainteresiranih strani je Komisija kot prednostno nalogo določila prizadevanja za doseg ključnih dejavnikov, ki so potrebni za dokončno oblikovanje notranjega energetskega trga do leta 2014 –
As it is foreseen that harmonised rules on transparency will pass the comitology procedure in 2012 the Commission establishes for the development of harmonised electricity rules this annual priority list for 2013:
Predvideno je, da bodo usklajena pravila o preglednosti leta 2012 prestala postopek v odboru, zato Komisija za oblikovanje usklajenih pravil o električni energiji vzpostavlja naslednji letni seznam prednostnih nalog za leto 2013:
capacity allocation and congestion management rules including governance for day-ahead and intraday markets including capacity calculation (adoption under comitology procedure),
pravila za dodeljevanje zmogljivosti in upravljanje prezasedenosti, vključno z upravljanjem trgov, na katerih se trguje en dan pred dobavo, in enodnevnih trgov, vključno z izračunom zmogljivosti (sprejetje po postopku v odboru),
rules for longer-term (forward) capacity allocation (drafting of network code),
pravila za dolgoročno (terminsko) dodeljevanje zmogljivosti (priprava kodeksa omrežja),
network connection rules:
pravila o priključitvi na omrežje:
network rules on generator grid connection (adoption under comitology procedure),
pravila omrežij za povezavo z generatorjem in priključitev na omrežje (sprejetje po postopku v odboru),
network code on distribution system operator and industrial load connection (finalise network code and start comitology process),
pravila omrežij o upravljavcu distribucijskega sistema in povezavi industrijske obremenitve (dokončanje kodeksa omrežja in začetek postopka v odboru),
network code on High-voltage direct current transmission system connection,
kodeks omrežij o povezavi prenosnega sistema visokonapetostnega neposrednega toka,