natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
stresses, therefore, that the use of FIs in cohesion policy in relation to the SMEs should be reinforced in the future as it can guarantee revolving funds, foster public-private partnerships and achieve a multiplier effect with the Union budget;
zato poudarja, da bi bilo treba v prihodnje povečati uporabo finančnih instrumentov v kohezijski politiki v povezavi z malimi in srednjimi podjetji, saj se s tem lahko zagotovi obnavljanje sredstev, spodbuja javno-zasebna partnerstva in dosega multiplikacijski učinek s proračunom Unije;
Recalls that to support entrepreneurship, the Union implements its enterprise policy and its cohesion policy mainly using grants but progressively more through FIs in the ERDF framework;
opozarja, da Unija podjetništvo podpira prek svoje podjetniške in kohezijske politike, pri tem pa v glavnem uporablja nepovratna sredstva, vse bolj pa tudi finančne instrumente v okviru ESRR;
notes that the FIs are repayable and revolving thereby ensuring that successive waves of SMEs can benefit;
je seznanjen s tem, da so finančni instrumenti vračljivi in obnovljivi, zato jih lahko mala in srednja podjetja izkoristijo vedno znova;
Recognises that the implementation of access to finance programmes requires the active involvement of financial intermediaries, which transform public funds into FIs for SMEs;
priznava, da dostop do programov financiranja zahteva dejavno udeležbo finančnih posrednikov, ki javna sredstva spremenijo v finančne instrumente za mala in srednja podjetja;
notes that additional funds provided by the private sector may be added to the public funding, increasing the total amount available for investments in SMEs;
ugotavlja, da se lahko dodatna sredstva, ki jih zagotavlja zasebni sektor, dodajo javnim finančnim sredstvom, s čimer se poveča skupni razpoložljivi znesek za naložbe v mala in srednja podjetja;
notes that this action is commonly defined as the leverage effect or the multiplier effect;
ugotavlja, da se takšno ukrepanje običajno opredeljuje kot finančni vzvod ali multiplikacijski učinek;
Stresses that lack of access to finance has led to a fall in the number of start-ups, which means that the role of FIs co-funded by the ERDF in stimulating entrepreneurship is assuming ever increasing importance;
poudarja, da je premalo dostopno financiranje vodilo k padcu števila novoustanovljenih podjetij, kar pomeni, da imajo finančni instrumenti, ki jih sofinancira ESRR, vse večjo vlogo pri spodbujanju podjetništva;
Recalls that the Court of Auditors’ audit focused on the financial engineering measures co-financed by the ERDF during the 2000-2006 and the 2007-2013 programming periods and that the audit findings are based on a direct review of a sample of projects and on an examination of the Commission and Member States’ management, monitoring and information systems;
opozarja, da se je Računsko sodišče v svoji reviziji osredotočilo na ukrepe finančnega inženirstva, ki jih je ESRR sofinanciral v programskih obdobjih 2000–2006 in 2007–2013, in da revizijske ugotovitve temeljijo na neposrednem pregledu vzorca projektov in na preverjanju sistemov za upravljanje in spremljanje ter informacijskih sistemov, ki so jih vzpostavile Komisija in države članice;
Notes that the Court of Auditors focused its audit in three main types of FIs:
je seznanjen, da se je Računsko sodišče v reviziji osredotočilo na tri glavne vrste finančnih instrumentov:
equity, loan and guarantee instruments;
lastniške, posojilne in garancijske;
notes that they are all eligible instruments for ERDF co-financing, but must comply with Union and national eligibility rules;
ugotavlja, da so vsi ti instrumenti upravičeni do sofinanciranja iz ESRR, vendar morajo biti skladni s predpisi Unije in nacionalnimi pravili o upravičenosti;
reiterates that the main objective of the audit was to assess whether ERDF spending on financial engineering measures for SMEs had been effective and efficient;
opozarja, da je bil glavni cilj revizije oceniti, ali so bila sredstva ESRR za ukrepe finančnega inženirstva porabljena učinkovito in uspešno;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ findings and recommendations regarding financing gap assessment;
pozdravlja ugotovitve in priporočila Računskega sodišča glede ocene vrzeli v financiranju;
notices that in the legislative proposal [19] for the next programming period such assessment is made obligatory in the form of an ex ante assessment;
ugotavlja, da je v zakonodajnem predlogu [19] za naslednje programsko obdobje tako vrednotenje obvezno v obliki predhodne ocene;
calls on the Commission to introduce relevant requirements, including quantified benchmarks, regarding the role and application of the ex ante assessment into the relevant regulation as part of the basic act;
poziva Komisijo, naj v zadevno uredbo kot del temeljnega akta vnese ustrezne zahteve glede vloge in uporabe predhodnega vrednotenja, vključno s količinskimi merili;
considers that the issue of revolving provisions should also be tackled in the legislative proposal for the next programming period;
meni, da bi bilo treba v zakonodajnem predlogu za naslednje programsko obdobje obravnavati tudi vprašanje določb o obnovljivih virih financiranja;
Notes that Structural Funds regulations allow establishing a preference for the private sector compared to the public;
ugotavlja, da uredbe o strukturnih skladih omogočajo prednostno obravnavo zasebnega sektorja v primerjavi z javnim;
invites the Commission to find appropriate justification for this privileged position, inasmuch as this treatment could limit the ability to repossess the excess funds and the possibility to allocate them to other SMEs;
poziva Komisijo, naj poišče ustrezno pojasnilo za ta privilegirani položaj, saj bi takšna obravnava lahko negativno vplivala na zmožnost ponovne pridobitve presežnih sredstev in možnost njihove dodelitve drugim malim in srednjim podjetjem;
Is concerned that the Court of Auditors found that the effectiveness and efficiency of measures were hampered by the following important shortcomings:
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da so učinkovitost in uspešnost ukrepov ovirale naslednje bistvene pomanjkljivosti:
the SME financing gap assessments, if available, suffered from significant shortcomings and such gap assessments were not systematically made public,
ocene vrzeli v financiranju za mala in srednja podjetja, če so že bile na voljo, so vsebovale bistvene pomanjkljivosti, prav tako pa niso bile sistematično objavljene,
the Structural Funds regulations, originally designed for grants, contain important weaknesses, as they do not address the specificities of FIs,
uredbe o strukturnih skladih, ki so bile prvotno zasnovane za nepovratna sredstva, vsebujejo bistvene pomanjkljivosti, saj ne obravnavajo specifičnih značilnosti finančnih instrumentov,
before funds reach SMEs, delays were significant and, compared with other Union programmes for SMEs, the ERDF’s ability to leverage in private investments was poor;
preden so finančna sredstva dosegla mala in srednja podjetja, je prihajalo do velikih zamud, sposobnost ESRR za pridobivanje zasebnih vlagateljev pa je bila v primerjavi z drugimi programi EU za mala in srednja podjetja slaba;
Recalls also that in its opinion on innovative financial instruments in the context of the next Multiannual Financial Framework [20], Parliament’s Committee on Regional Development called for guaranteeing immediate clarity, simplicity and transparency of the FI legal framework and coherent legal reference to definitions of FIs;
opozarja, da je tudi Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za regionalni razvoj v mnenju o inovativnih finančnih instrumentih v povezavi z večletnim finančnim okvirom [20] pozval k takojšnji zagotovitvi jasnosti, preprostosti in preglednosti pravnega okvira finančnih instrumentov ter enotni pravni referenci za opredelitve finančnih instrumentov;
Notes with concern that the previous annual implementation reports, monitoring committees and operational program indicators have been considered as inadequate or inappropriate to the targets and purposes of FIs;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da so bili prejšnja letna poročila o izvrševanju, odbori za spremljanje in kazalniki operativnih programov ocenjeni kot neustrezni ali neprilagojeni finančnim instrumentom;
welcomes the developments in the reporting and monitoring activity registered with JEREMIE;
pozdravlja razvoj, ki je bil dosežen pri spremljanju sklada Jeremie in poročanju o njem;
Regrets that at the level of the holding funds, the Court of Auditors did not come across significant leverage from the private sector for both the 2000-2006 and 2007-2013 programming periods;
obžaluje, da Računsko sodišče na ravni holdinških skladov ni naletelo na občuten vzvod iz zasebnega sektorja ne v programskem obdobju 2000–2006 ne v programskem obdobju 2007–2013;
is surprised that there are typically no explicit leverage requirements in the funding agreements between the Managing Authorities and the financial intermediaries, except for certain equity funds, which had binding leverage requirements for private co-investors;
je presenečen, ker v sporazumih o financiranju med organi za upravljanje in finančnimi posredniki običajno ni izrecnih zahtev glede finančnega vzvoda, izjema so le nekateri lastniški skladi, ki so imeli obvezujoče zahteve glede finančnega vzvoda za zasebne sovlagatelje;
Supports the Court of Auditors’ call for a clearer definition of the concept of leverage in FIs;
podpira poziv Računskega sodišča k jasnejši opredelitvi koncepta vzvoda v finančnih instrumentih;
stresses, none the less, that in the light of the pressure to deliver higher leverage, it is important to recall that FIs in cohesion policy are generally financing projects in less developed regions and regions with economic difficulties, with the aim of improving situations of market failure and sub-optimal investment, thus FIs in cohesion policy do not only focus on short-term profitability but also on high socioeconomic benefits, especially at regional and local level;
kljub temu poudarja, da je glede na pritiske za doseganje večjega učinka vzvoda treba spomniti, da so finančni instrumenti v kohezijski politiki v splošnem projekti financiranja v manj razvitih regijah in regijah z gospodarskimi težavami, njihov namen pa je izboljšati razmere, nastale zaradi nedelovanja trga in neoptimalnih naložb, zato niso usmerjeni samo v kratkoročno dobičkonosnost, ampak tudi v velike socialno-ekonomske koristi zlasti na regionalni in lokalni ravni;
points at multi-level governance and shared management in design and delivery of the programmes as the fundamental concepts behind cohesion policy that enable regional and national authorities to partake in planning and implementation of programmes;
poudarja, da sta upravljanje na več ravneh in deljeno upravljanje pri oblikovanju in izvajanju programov temeljni načeli kohezijske politike, ki regionalnim in nacionalnim organom omogočata sodelovanje pri načrtovanju in izvajanju programov;
stresses, therefore, that the legislative framework needs to maintain a certain level of flexibility also when it comes to definitions and requirements of leverage effect;
zato poudarja, da je treba v zakonodajnem okviru ohraniti določeno raven prožnosti, tudi pri opredelitvah in zahtevah glede učinka vzvoda;
Recognises the potential of innovative financial engineering instruments to build up capital and enhance investments, as opposed to grants consistently perceived to be excessively cumbersome and bureaucratic by their beneficiaries;
se zaveda potenciala inovativnih instrumentov finančnega inženirstva za povečanje kapitala in naložb, v nasprotju z nepovratnimi sredstvi, ki pri upravičencih vedno veljajo za izjemno okorna in birokratska;
stresses that financial engineering instruments could play an important role in achieving the Europe 2020 Strategy’s objectives by attracting funding from other investors in areas of strong Union’s interest;
poudarja, da bi ti instrumenti lahko imeli pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020, saj bi pritegnili finančna sredstva drugih vlagateljev na področjih, ki so v velikem interesu Unije;
Further notes that for equity and loan instruments, the Court of Auditors found that the leverage achieved has not been significant and lower than comparator benchmarks;
ugotavlja še, da je pri lastniških in posojilnih instrumentih Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da doseženi finančni vzvod ni bil pomemben in da je bil nižji od primerjalnih referenčnih meril;
notes with satisfaction that for guarantee instruments, in contrast, leverage was higher;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je bil pri garancijskih instrumentih finančni vzvod nasprotno zelo visok;
Calls on the Commission to take action, without delay, regarding the findings of the Court of Auditors;
zahteva, da Komisija v zvezi z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča ukrepa brez odlašanja;
considers particularly important that, in the future, the ERDF’s ability to leverage in private investments that match public contributions is increased;
pripisuje poseben pomen temu, da je treba v prihodnje povečati sposobnost ESRR za pridobivanje sredstev zasebnih vlagateljev do te mere, da bi zasebna sredstva ustrezala javnim prispevkom;
Is concerned at the widespread delays in Member States in SMEs obtaining access to finance;
je zaskrbljen zaradi vsesplošnih zamud, do katerih prihaja v državah članicah, kadar mala in srednja podjetja iščejo možnosti financiranja;
calls on the Commission and Managing Authorities to avoid delays in delivering SME access to finance mainly with origin in administrative, legal, organisational or strategic reasons;
zahteva, da Komisija in upravljavski organi pri omogočanju dostopa malih in srednjih podjetij do financiranja poskusijo odpraviti zamude iz administrativnih, pravnih, organizacijskih ali strateških razlogov;
regrets that for Managing Authorities this entails that the alternative, using grants for SMEs, becomes more attractive;
obžaluje, da z vidika upravljavskih organov to pomeni, da postane privlačnejša alternativa, torej nepovratna sredstva za mala in srednja podjetja;
Urges the Commission to submit an integrated, clarifying proposal as soon as possible on the problems caused by the current range of definitions of SMEs, which vary in the Union according to the different purposes or objectives, and to propose possible ways of remedying the situation;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predstavi celovit predlog s pojasnitvijo težav, ki so posledica različnih opredelitev malih in srednjih podjetij v Uniji glede na različne namene in cilje, pa tudi z možnimi rešitvam za ta položaj;
Deplores that, in some cases, information on management costs borne by the SMEs was not available or was not reliable;
obžaluje, da podatki o stroških upravljanja, ki so jih nosila mala in srednja podjetja, v nekaterih primerih niso bili na voljo ali niso bili zanesljivi;
invites the competent authorities to improve the current situation and to provide for the future all the relevant information;
poziva pristojne organe, naj izboljšajo sedanje stanje in v prihodnje zagotovijo vse ustrezne informacije;
recognises that a distinction should be made in relation to costs of the financial engineering instruments (management cost of the JEREMIE holding fund and management cost of financial intermediaries) and the cost to SMEs;
priznava, da je treba razlikovati med stroški instrumentov finančnega inženirstva (stroški upravljanja holdinškega sklada Jeremie in stroški upravljanja finančnih posrednikov) ter stroški malih in srednjih podjetij;
Deplores the fact that in a number of cases, financial intermediaries appointed by the respective Managing Authorities charged individual SMEs for the refinancing and processing costs;
obžaluje dejstvo, da so v nekaterih primerih finančni posredniki, ki so jih imenovali ustrezni organi za upravljanje, posameznim malim in srednjim podjetjem zaračunali stroške refinanciranja in obravnave;
stresses that refinancing and processing costs should be items of ordinary operating expenditures for financial intermediaries;
poudarja, da bi morali biti ti stroški vključeni v redne izdatke za poslovanje finančnih posrednikov;
Stresses the importance of simplifying administrative procedures as regards access to financing and of reducing co-financing requirements;
poudarja, da je pomembno poenostaviti upravne postopke za dostop do financiranja in zmanjšati zahteve za sofinanciranje;
Is concerned by the fact that Commission guidance does not set the terms and conditions which would prevent SMEs being charged costs that are not based on actual SME risk taken or service provided by the financial intermediaries;
je zaskrbljen, ker smernice Komisije ne določajo pogojev, ki bi zagotovili, da bi se malim in srednjim podjetjem zaračunalo samo stroške, ki temeljijo na dejanskem tveganju finančnih posrednikov ali storitvi, ki so jo opravili;
Recommends that in light of the combined complexity of FIs, shared management and the State aid and Structural Funds rules, the Commission should improve the communication and monitoring systems between the Commission, the Managing Authorities and the beneficiaries (the financial intermediaries) and provide for, given the new provisions of the 2007-2013 regulatory framework, better guidance and advice;
priporoča, da bi bilo treba zaradi zapletenosti finančnih instrumentov, deljenega upravljanja ter pravil o državni pomoči in strukturnih skladih izboljšati sisteme sporočanja in spremljanja med Komisijo, upravljavskimi organi in upravičenci (finančni posredniki), glede na nove določbe ureditvenega okvira 2007–2013 pa zagotoviti boljše smernice in svetovanje;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation that the Commission should provide a reliable and technically robust monitoring and evaluation system specific to FIs;
podpira priporočilo Računskega sodišča, da bi Komisija morala zagotoviti zanesljiv in tehnično stabilen sistem spremljanja in ocenjevanja, specifičen za finančne instrumente;
invites the Commission to also follow the Court of Auditors’ recommendation regarding agreement with Member States on a small number of measurable, relevant, specific and uniform result indicators for FIs, which would strengthen both monitoring and auditing processes;
poleg tega Komisijo poziva, naj upošteva priporočilo Računskega sodišča in se z državami članicami dogovori o manjšem številu merljivih, pomembnih, specifičnih in enotnih kazalnikov rezultatov za finančne instrumente, kar bi okrepilo proces spremljanja in revizije;
Notes that the territorial fragmentation and insufficient critical mass have impact on the attractiveness of the FIs and impose certain financial conditions and possible relatively high management cost;
je seznanjen, da so finančni instrumenti zaradi ozemeljske razdrobljenosti in nezadostne kritične mase manj privlačni, kar ima za posledico določene finančne pogoje in včasih sorazmerno visoke stroške upravljanja;
notes that those characteristics of the ERDF hampered the sound financial management of the FIs throughout the different programming periods underpinning ERDF support to SMEs;
ugotavlja, da sta omenjeni značilnosti ESRR v različnih programskih obdobjih ovirali dobro finančno upravljanje finančnih instrumentov;
Regrets that, during the operational programme funding allocation process, public authorities typically not acquainted with SME financing, allocated public contributions to funds in such a fashion that their size often reached below critical mass;
obžaluje, da med postopkom dodeljevanja sredstev operativnega programa javni organi, ki običajno niso seznanjeni s financiranjem malih in srednjih podjetij, dodeljujejo javne prispevke v sklade tako, da njihov obseg pogosto ne doseže kritične mase;
insists that different thematic operational programmes with multiple economic, environmental, social and territorial objectives were at the origin of this situation;
vztraja, da so bili vzrok za takšno stanje različni tematski operativni programi z več ekonomskimi, okoljskimi, socialnimi in ozemeljskimi cilji;
Is of the opinion that when proposing financial engineering measures, the Managing Authorities should make sure that their proposal is duly justified by an SME gap assessment of high quality, based on a standardised and commonly agreed methodology;
meni, da bi morali upravljavski organi zagotoviti, da bodo njihovi predlogi za ukrepe finančnega inženirstva ustrezno utemeljeni s kakovostno oceno vrzeli v financiranju za mala in srednja podjetja, ki bo temeljila na standardizirani in dogovorjeni metodologiji;
supports the Commission verifying their consistency with the SME gap assessment and ensure the quality of the latter, before approving the operational programmes, including financial engineering measures;
podpira zamisel, da bi morala Komisija pred potrditvijo operativnih programov, vključno z ukrepi finančnega inženirstva, preveriti njihovo skladnost z oceno vrzeli v financiranju za mala in srednja podjetja ter zagotoviti kakovost te ocene;
Is worried about the lack of information in the Member States on access for SMEs to sources of finance;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkanja podatkov o dostopu malih in srednjih podjetij do virov financiranja v državah članicah;
supports the recommendation by the Court of Auditors that, in order to optimise the size of the supply of SME finance, it is necessary to raise as much as possible the stakeholders’ awareness of the specific SME financing needs;
podpira priporočilo Računskega sodišča, da bi bilo treba za optimizacijo obsega financiranja za mala in srednja podjetja čim bolj povečati ozaveščenost interesnih skupin o posebnih potrebah malih in srednjih podjetij po financiranju;
Is of the opinion that the multiplier effect should illustrate the extent to which private funding has been attracted by both the Union’s and Member States’ initial financial contributions;
meni, da bi moral multiplikacijski učinek ponazarjati, v kolikšni meri so začetni finančni prispevki Unije in držav članic spodbudili zasebno financiranje;
considers that Member States’ co-financing of FIs should be seen, together with the Union contribution, as a part of public funding;
meni, da bi bilo treba na sofinanciranje finančnih instrumentov s strani držav članic, skupaj s prispevkom Unije, gledati kot na del javnih sredstev;
Believes that matters to be covered by delegated acts, which are meant to cover non-essential elements of Union legislation, should not deal in reality with key elements of the future Cohesion scheme [21];
meni, da zadeve, ki naj bi bile zajete v delegiranih aktih, namenjenih pokrivanju nebistvenih elementov zakonodaje Unije, v resnici ne bi smele obravnavati bistvenih elementov prihodnje kohezijske sheme [21];
Strongly recommends that the Council and the Commission, when designing proposals for the Structural Funds regulations, should provide for a more adequate regulatory framework so that the design and the implementation of financial engineering measures do not suffer from the deficiencies of the Structural Funds‘ regulatory framework, geographical constraints and scattering effects;
toplo priporoča, da bi morala Svet in Komisija pri pripravi predlogov uredb o strukturnih skladih zagotoviti ustreznejši regulativni okvir, da bi preprečila neugodne posledice pomanjkljivosti regulativnega okvira strukturnih skladov, geografskih omejitev in učinkov razpršenosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje ukrepov finančnega inženirstva;
asks that lessons learnt from the current programming period be reflected when designing the proposals for the Structural Funds regulation;
poziva, naj se pri oblikovanju predlogov za uredbo o strukturnih skladih upoštevajo izkušnje iz sedanjega programskega obdobja;
considers in particular that proposals should be oriented towards performance and results rather than mere compliance;
zlasti meni, da bi morali biti predlogi usmerjeni v uspešno izvajanje in rezultate, in ne le v skladnost s predpisi;