natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The exchange of slots was carried out in 2010 and BA paid the consideration to ČSA in two instalments in November and December 2010.
Zamenjava slotov je bila izvršena leta 2010, BA pa je plačala nadomestilo ČSA v dveh obrokih, in sicer novembra in decembra 2010.
ČSA sold 15 aircraft under the following conditions:
ČSA je prodala 15 zrakoplovov pod naslednjimi pogoji:
In 2010, ČSA sold five Boeing B737-400s to BLF Limited, which is a special-purpose vehicle of the Russian carrier UTair, for the price of USD [54–60] million and two Boeing B737-500s to Mauritanian Airlines International for the price of USD [12,5–15] million.
Leta 2010 je ČSA prodala pet zrakoplovov vrste Boeing B737-400 družbi BLF Limited, ki je posebna namenska družba ruskega letalskega prevoznika UTair za ceno [54–60] milijonov USD in dva zrakoplova Boeing B737-500 družbi Mauritanian Airlines International za ceno [12,5–15] milijonov USD.
In 2011, ČSA sold three Boeing B737-500s to Mika Limited for the total price of USD [21–25] million.
Leta 2011 je ČSA prodala tri zrakoplove Boeinge B737-500 družbi Mika Limited za skupno ceno [21–25] milijonov USD.
In 2011 ČSA sold two ATR72-202s to Helitt Lineas Aéreas S.A. for the price of USD [7,9–8,9] million, two ATR72-200s to EUROLOT S.A. for the price of USD [7,9–8,9] million and one ATR42-320 to Regourd Aviation for the price of USD [1,6–1,9] million.
Leta 2011 je ČSA prodala dva ATR72-202 družbi Helitt Lineas Aéreas S.A. za ceno [7,9–8,9] milijonov USD, dva ATR72-200 družbi EUROLOT S.A. za ceno [7,9–8,9] milijonov USD in enega ATR42-320 družbi Regourd Aviation za ceno [1,6–1,9] milijona USD.
The total revenue from the sales of aircraft amounts to approximately USD [105–120] million, or CZK [1,950–2,2] billion [11].
Celotni prihodki od prodaje zrakoplovov znašajo približno [105–120] milijonov USD oziroma [1,950–2,2] milijarde CZK [11].
On 30 September 2010, ČSA sold Slovak Air Services, s.r.o., a provider of air services in the Slovak Republic, to the company Skyport, a.s. for the purchase price of CZK [17,5–19,5] million.
ČSA je 30. septembra 2010 prodala Slovak Air Services, s.r.o., ponudnika zračnih storitev v Slovaški republiki, družbi Skyport, a.s. za nakupno ceno [17,5–19,5] milijona CZK.
The bidder offered the highest price in an open tender procedure.
Ponudnik je ponudil najvišjo ceno na odprtem razpisu.
ČSA generated CZK [1,62–1,85] billion from the sale of land and buildings to the State-owned Prague Airport.
ČSA je ustvarila [1,62–1,85] milijarde prihodkov od prodaje zemljišč in stavb Letališču Praga v državni lasti.
A summary of the sales is described in Table 6 below.
V preglednici 6 je naveden povzetek prodaje.
Sale of land and property of ČSA to Prague Airport
Prodaja zemljišč in premoženja ČSA Letališču Praga
Plot/Asset
Parcela/sredstvo
Purchase agreement
Nakupna pogodba
Price ('000 CZK)
Cena (v tisočih CZK)
Expert appraisal
Strokovna ocena
Proscon, s.r.o., dated 8.12.2009
Proscon, s.r.o., z dne 8.12.2009
Parking on plots 2570/4 and 2570/13
Parkiranje na parcelah 2570/4 in 2570/13
APC office building
Poslovna stavba APC
YBN Consult dated 10.5.2010
YBN Consult z dne 10.5.2010
The Government of the Czech Republic has expressed its strategic interest in acquiring ČSA's airside properties.
Vlada Češke republike je izrazila strateški interes za pridobitev premoženja ČSA v nadzorovanem delu letališča.
The Czech authorities justify these transactions with the use they will make of the properties.
Češke oblasti te transakcije utemeljujejo s predvideno uporabo premoženja.
According to the Czech authorities, the property is strategically important for Prague Airport with a view to the new runway to be built at the airport.
Po mnenju čeških oblasti je premoženje strateško pomembno za Letališče Praga zaradi nove vzletno-pristajalne steze.
The Czech Republic also noted that Prague Airport is renting another hangar (Hangar E) to Travel Service, a.s. which shows the potential of obtaining revenues from marketing real estate no longer needed by ČSA.
Češka republika je tudi navedla, da Letališče Praga družbi Travel Service, a.s. oddaja v najem še en hangar (Hangar E), kar kaže potencial za ustvarjanje prihodkov iz naslova trženja nepremičnin, ki jih ČSA ne potrebuje več.
The sale of the property described in Table 6 was not carried out by way of an open, transparent and non-discriminatory tender.
Prodaja premoženja, opisana v preglednici 6, ni bila izvedena z odprtim, preglednim in nediskriminatornim razpisom.
However, in line with its general policy and the legal national requirements, all property acquisitions by a State-owned company have to be done at a fair open-market value which reflects the price that would be paid on an arm's-length basis by a private investor.
V skladu s splošno politiko družbe in nacionalnimi zakonskimi zahtevami mora biti vsaka pridobitev premoženja v državni lasti izvedena po pošteni običajni tržni vrednosti, ki odraža ceno, ki bi jo zasebni vlagatelj plačal v neodvisnem tržnem poslu.
The value of this property is based on an independent external valuation by court-registered experts which uses recognised standards.
Vrednost tega premoženja temelji na neodvisni zunanji cenitvi sodnih cenilcev z uporabo priznanih standardov.
The most important part of the company's own contribution comes from the sale of subsidiaries of ČSA to ČAH.
Najpomembnejši del lastnega prispevka družbe je prodaja odvisnih družb ČSA družbi ČAH.
These sales took place at the end of 2011/beginning of 2012 and consisted of the sale of Czech Airlines Handling, a.s.
Ta prodaja je bila izvedena konec leta 2011/začetek leta 2012 in je vključevala prodajo Czech Airlines Handling, a.s.
(CZK [700-800] million), the sale of ČSA Services, s.r.o.
([700–800] milijonov CZK), prodajo ČSA Services, s.r.o.
(CZK [25–28] million), and the sale of HCA (CZK [500–580] million) and Czech Airlines Technics, a.s.
([25–28]milijonov CZK), prodajo HCA ([500–580] milijonov CZK) in Czech Airlines Technics, a.s.
(CZK [1-1,15] billion).
([1–1,15] milijarde CZK).
The sales were not carried out by way of an open, transparent and non-discriminatory tender;
Prodaja ni bila izvedena s pomočjo odprtega, preglednega in nediskriminatornega razpisa;
however, the value of the subsidiaries was established by independent appraisal reports provided by Deloitte Advisory, s.r.o. and PricewaterhouseCoopers Česka republika, s.r.o.
vendar je bila vrednost odvisnih družb določena v neodvisnih poročilih o vrednotenju, ki sta jih pripravili družbi Deloitte Advisory, s.r.o. in PricewaterhouseCoopers Česka republika, s.r.o.
On 23 February 2011, the Commission opened the formal investigation procedure.
Komisija je 23. februarja 2011 začela formalni postopek preiskave.
In its opening decision, the Commission expressed doubts relating to several conditions of the R&R Guidelines.
Komisija je v svojem sklepu o začetku postopka izrazila dvome glede več pogojev iz smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
In particular, the Commission did not exclude that ČSA had been in difficulties according to the R&R Guidelines already before the second half of 2009, i.e. before the start of the restructuring process as claimed by the Czech authorities.
Zlasti Komisija ni izključila dejstva, da je bila ČSA glede na smernice za reševanje in prestrukturiranje v težavah že pred drugo polovico leta 2009, tj. pred začetkom postopka prestrukturiranja, kot trdijo češke oblasti.
The Commission also expressed doubt regarding the point whether the difficulties of ČSA were too serious to be dealt with by ČAH.
Poleg tega je Komisija izrazila dvom glede dejstva, ali so bile težave ČSA prehude, da bi jih rešil ČAH.
The Commission also wondered whether it would be possible under Czech law for Prague Airport to contribute financially to the restructuring process of ČSA and its subsidiaries.
Komisijo je tudi zanimalo, ali bi bilo v skladu s češko zakonodajo mogoče, da Letališče Praga zagotovi finančni prispevek za postopek prestrukturiranja ČSA in njenih odvisnih družb.
Also, the Czech authorities were invited to comment on whether the business transactions between ČSA and Prague Airport, as of the date of implementation of the merger, had taken place on market terms which excluded the transfer of possible State aid from a beneficiary of rescue or restructuring aid to another entity within ČAH.
Prav tako so bile češke oblasti povabljene, naj predložijo pripombe glede tega, ali so bile poslovne transakcije med ČSA in Letališčem Praga od dneva združitve izvedene po tržnih pogojih, kar izključuje prenos morebitnih državnih pomoči z upravičenca do pomoči za reševanje ali prestrukturiranje na drug subjekt znotraj ČAH.
Regarding the return to long-term viability, the Commission invited third parties to comment on the underlying assumptions concerning the external factors.
Glede obnovitve dolgoročne sposobnosti preživetja je Komisija povabila tretje osebe, naj predložijo pripombe v zvezi s temeljnimi predpostavkami o zunanjih dejavnikih.
The Commission also invited the Czech Republic to clarify whether all of the structurally loss-making activities would be abandoned after restructuring.
Komisija je prav tako povabila Češko republiko, naj pojasni, ali bodo po prestrukturiranju opuščene vse strukturne dejavnosti, ki ustvarjajo izgubo.
Furthermore, the Commission questioned whether long-term viability could be achieved by the end of 2012, which was the notified end of the restructuring period, and whether the envisaged most likely scenario (which was also the "best-case scenario") was indeed the most realistic one to be achieved.
Nadalje je Komisija izrazila dvom, ali je mogoče doseči dolgoročno sposobnost preživetja družbe do konca leta 2012, ki je bilo priglašeno kot konec obdobja prestrukturiranja, in ali je bil predviden najverjetnejši scenarij (ki je bil tudi „najboljši možni scenarij“) dejansko najbolj realističen.
Also, the Commission doubted whether ČSA would be able to secure (from its own financial means or from external resources) commercial loans and possible commercial guarantees for the planned purchase of 7 aircraft contracted for the years 2013 and 2014.
Poleg tega je Komisija tudi izrazila dvom, ali bo ČSA lahko (iz lastnih finančnih sredstev ali zunanjih virov) zagotovila komercialna posojila in mogoče komercialne garancije za načrtovani nakup 7 zrakoplovov po pogodbah za leti 2013 in 2014.
Regarding compensatory measures, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether the proposed measures were not merely closure of loss-making activities which would in any case be necessary in order to achieve viability.
Komisija je glede izravnalnih ukrepov izrazila pomisleke, da so bili predlagani ukrepi mogoče le ukinitev dejavnosti, ki so ustvarjale izgubo, ki bi bili v vsakem primeru potrebni za zagotovitev sposobnosti preživetja.
Such measures would then not qualify as genuine compensatory measures.
V takem primeru ti ukrepi ne bi šteli kot dejanski izravnalni ukrepi.
The Commission also noted that only compensatory measures taking place within the restructuring period could be accepted.
Komisija je prav tako navedla, da so sprejemljivi le izravnalni ukrepi, izvedeni v obdobju prestrukturiranja.
Therefore, the discontinuation of the Toronto and New York JFK flights would fall outside the proposed restructuring period, which was from the second half of 2009 until 2012.
Zato ukinitev poletov v Toronto in New York ne spada v predlagano obdobje prestrukturiranja, ki je bilo od druge polovice leta 2009 do leta 2012.
Regarding the level of own contribution of ČSA, the Commission invited the Czech Republic to clarify the proposed ČAH structure.
Glede ravni lastnega prispevka ČSA je Komisija povabila Češko republiko, naj pojasni predlagano sestavo ČAH.
It also questioned whether the totality of the proposed own contribution could be considered real (in relation to the transactions that had not yet taken place at the time of adoption of the opening decision).
Prav tako je izrazila pomisleke, ali je skupna vsota predlaganega lastnega prispevka sploh lahko realna (v zvezi s posli, ki še niso bili opravljeni ob sprejetju sklepa o začetku postopka).
In its reply to the Commission's opening decision, the Czech Republic submitted comments and clarifications regarding all of the points raised in the Commission's opening decision, indicating that the notified RP complied with all the conditions imposed by the R&R Guidelines.
V svojem odgovoru na sklep Komisije o začetku postopka je Češka republika predložila pripombe in pojasnila o vseh točkah, izpostavljenih v sklepu Komisije o začetku postopka, ter navedla, da je bil priglašeni NP skladen z vsemi pogoji, določenimi v smernicah za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
Moreover, the Czech Republic also provided an update regarding the restructuring process, demonstrating that a number of restructuring measures had already been implemented and that significant progress had already been made.
Nadalje je Češka republika zagotovila posodobitev postopka prestrukturiranja, v kateri je pokazala, da so bili številni ukrepi prestrukturiranja že izvedeni in je bil dosežen pomemben napredek.
As regards the point of time when ČSA entered into difficulties, the Czech Republic asserted that ČSA was in difficulties as of August 2009 because this was when management realised that even the usually profitable performance of the company in the summer season had been negatively impacted.
Glede časa, ko je ČSA zašla v težave, je Češka republika zatrjevala, da je bila ČSA v težavah od avgusta 2009, saj se je vodstvo takrat zavedlo, da se negativni vplivi poznajo tudi na tistem delu poslovanja, ki je bilo po navadi dobičkonosno v poletni sezoni.
The Czech Republic also provided quarterly results and additional information demonstrating why it considered that ČSA had entered into difficulty only in August 2009.
Češka republika je zagotovila tudi četrtletne rezultate in dodatne informacije o tem, zakaj je menila, da je ČSA zašla v težave šele avgusta 2009.
As regards the ČAH holding structure, the Czech authorities clarified that the purpose of ČAH was to "unbundle" the companies and to improve their access to commercial financing and prepare them for the planned privatisation.
Glede holdinške strukture ČAH so češke oblasti pojasnile, da je bil namen ČAH „ločiti“ družbe in izboljšati njihov dostop do komercialnega financiranja ter jih pripraviti za načrtovano privatizacijo.
Relations between the companies within the holding company would be regulated by contract, on an arm's length basis, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Czech Commercial Code and the Income Tax Act governing relations between related parties.
Odnose med družbami v holdingu bi urejale pogodbe, sklenjene na tržni podlagi in v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi češkega trgovinskega zakonika in zakona o dohodnini, ki ureja odnose med povezanimi osebami.
As regards the impossibility of resolving ČSA's difficulties within the ČAH group, the Czech Republic clarified that all of the companies within ČAH were controlled by the State and therefore any assistance would be subject to State aid rules.
V zvezi z nezmožnostjo rešitve težav ČSA v okviru skupine ČAH je Češka republika pojasnila, da je vse družbe v ČAH obvladovala država, zaradi česar bi kakršna koli pomoč spadala v okvir pravil o državni pomoči.
Moreover, any financial assistance would also have to meet the requirements of the Czech Commercial Code and tax laws.
Nadalje bi morala kakršna koli finančna pomoč izpolnjevati zahteve češkega trgovinskega zakonika in davčne zakonodaje.
Also, the problems ČSA faced arose before the creation of the ČAH structure and thus could not be the result of "arbitrary distribution of costs within the current ČSA group" and were hence intrinsic in nature to ČSA.
Poleg tega so težave, s katerimi se je srečevala ČSA, nastale pred vzpostavitvijo sestave ČAH, zaradi česar niso mogle biti rezultat „samovoljnega prerazporejanja stroškov v sedanji skupini ČSA“ in so izhajale iz družbe ČSA same.
As regards any possible contribution to the restructuring of ČSA by Prague Airport, the Czech Republic asserted that the airport was not contributing to ČSA's restructuring in any way, and that the Czech Republic, as sole shareholder in Prague Airport, did not envisage any such contribution in the future either.
Glede mogočega prispevka Letališča Praga k prestrukturiranju ČSA je Češka republika ugotovila, da letališče nikakor ni prispevalo k prestrukturiranju ČSA in da Češka republika kot edini delničar Letališča Praga tudi ni predvidela takega prispevka v prihodnosti.
Transactions between ČSA and Prague Airport were carried out on the standard terms offered by Prague Airport to its business partners.
Posli med ČSA in Letališčem Praga so bili opravljeni po standardnih pogojih, kot jih Letališče Praga zagotavlja svojim poslovnim partnerjem.
Rents and other pecuniary considerations were based on its applicable price lists.
Najemnine in druga denarna nadomestila so temeljila na veljavnih cenikih.
Apart from compliance with legal statutory requirements, the companies within ČAH would enjoy substantial business autonomy in so far as the parent company, ČAH, would not interfere with the business management of its subsidiaries.
Razen skladnosti z zakonskimi normativnimi zahtevami bi imele družbe v ČAH precejšno poslovno avtonomijo, če se matična družba, ČAH, ne bi vmešavala v vodenje poslov svojih odvisnih družb.
Since all relations between the companies within ČAH would be conducted on an arm's length basis, in compliance with legal requirements, as stated above, the Czech Republic asserted that any transfer of the restructuring aid granted to ČSA by any company within ČAH was impossible.
Ker bi vsi odnosi med družbami v ČAH temeljili na tržni podlagi, v skladu z navedenimi zakonskimi zahtevami, Češka republika trdi, da nobena družba v ČAH ni mogla opraviti nikakršnega prenosa pomoči za prestrukturiranje, odobrene ČSA.
Regarding the doubts about the return to long-term viability, the Czech Republic presented amended forecasts regarding the future scenario of viability of ČSA, presenting an amended base-case scenario.
Glede dvomov o obnovitvi dolgoročne sposobnosti za preživetje je Češka republika predstavila spremenjene napovedi glede prihodnjih scenarijev dolgoročne sposobnosti za preživetje ČSA, in sicer spremenjen osnovni scenarij.
The new base-case scenario anticipated a slower growth rate following a revisited demand development as well as more conservative estimates of future oil prices.
Novi osnovni scenarij je predvidel počasnejšo stopnjo rasti po ponovni preučitvi gibanja povpraševanja in konservativnejši oceni cen nafte v prihodnosti.
As regards the discontinuation of unprofitable activities, the Czech Republic confirmed that all subsidiaries with the exception of Czech Airlines Technics generated a profit, and as such could be sold as well-functioning and viable businesses.
Glede ukinitve dejavnosti, ki ne ustvarjajo dobička, je Češka Republika potrdila, da so vse odvisne družbe, razen Czech Airlines Technics, ustvarile dobiček in jih je kot take mogoče prodati kot dobro delujoče družbe, sposobne preživetja.
Czech Airlines Technics would also be sold to ČAH at the price of its assets, as evaluated by an independent external expert.
Czech Airlines Technics bi bil prav tako prodan ČAH po ceni premoženja, kot bi jo določil neodvisni zunanji strokovnjak.
As regards the financing of the aircraft to be delivered after the restructuring period, the Czech Republic believed that, upon implementation of the RP and the expected entry of a private investor, the company would be able to secure private financing for the contracted planes.
Glede financiranja zrakoplovov, ki naj bi bili dostavljeni po obdobju prestrukturiranja, je češka republika menila, da bi bila družba po izvedbi NP in pričakovanem vstopu zasebnega vlagatelja sposobna zagotoviti zasebno financiranje za pogodbeno dogovorjena letala.
As regards compensatory measures, the Czech Republic asserted that the sale of assets (including its subsidiaries), the reduction of ASK and the reduction of ČSA's presence at Prague Airport constituted a sufficient compensatory measure in view of the fact that ČSA was a regional carrier with a small fleet and a limited number of destinations.
Glede izravnalnih ukrepov je Češka republika trdila, da so prodaja sredstev (vključno z odvisnimi družbami), zmanjšanje števila ponujenih sedežev oziroma kilometrov in okrnjena prisotnost ČSA na Letališču Praga pomenili zadosten izravnalni ukrep z vidika dejstva, da je bila družba ČSA regionalni letalski prevoznik z majhno floto in omejenim številom ciljnih krajev.
It was exposed to competitive pressure from large companies and low-cost carriers and hence any further compensation could jeopardise ČSA's ability to become viable within a reasonable timescale.
Izpostavljena je bila konkurenčnim pritiskom večjih družb in nizkocenovnih prevoznikov, zato bi lahko vsaka dodatna konkurenca ogrozila sposobnost preživetja ČSA v razumnem časovnem okviru.
The Czech Republic asserted that the Toronto and New York JFK flights had been discontinued in November 2009, hence within the notified restructuring period.
Češka republika je navedla, da so bili poleti v Toronto in New York ukinjeni novembra 2009, torej v obdobju prestrukturiranja.
The Czech Republic provided information about a private loan amounting to CZK [125–140] million granted by Komerční banka which was proposed as an own contribution of ČSA.
Češka republika je zagotovila informacije o zasebnem posojilu v višini [125–140] milijonov CZK, ki ga je odobrila Komerční banka in je bilo predlagano kot lastni prispevek.
The loan consisted of a credit line based on a framework agreement.
Posojilo je sestavljala kreditna linija na podlagi okvirne pogodbe.
The framework agreement providing for a credit line of CZK [480-540] million had already been concluded on 31 March 2009 and amended in June and December 2009.
Okvirna pogodba, ki zagotavlja kreditno linijo v višini [480-540] milijonov CZK, je bila sklenjena že 31. marca 2009, nato pa spremenjena junija 2009 in decembra 2009.
Regarding the own contribution of ČSA to its restructuring, the Czech Republic presented proofs of sale of already divested assets.
Glede lastnega prispevka ČSA k prestrukturiranju je češka republika predstavila dokaze o prodaji prej dezinvestiranih sredstev.
Furthermore, the Czech Republic confirmed that the notified State aid in the form of a guarantee would not be needed as ČSA was able to obtain private financing of the aircraft which was procured in the form of a financial lease that was provided by […].
Nadalje je Češka republika potrdila, da priglašena državna pomoč v obliki garancije ne bi bila potrebna, saj je ČSA pridobila zasebno financiranje zrakoplova, ki ga je v obliki finančnega najema zagotovil […].
The aircraft was delivered to ČSA in May 2011.
ČSA je zrakoplov dobila maja 2011.
During the investigation procedure the Commission received only one substantiated comment from a competitor [12] and one comment from a local civic association [13].
Med postopkom preiskave je Komisija prejela en utemeljen komentar konkurenta [12] in en komentar lokalnega civilnega združenja [13].
The competitor is Travel Service, a.s. and Icelandair Group hf (hereinafter referred to as "TS"), a company that competes with ČSA mainly in the charter travel market.
Konkurent je Travel Service, a.s. in Icelandair Group hf (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TS), družba, ki ČSA konkurira zlasti na trgu čarterskih potovanj.
TS argues that the aid to ČSA cannot be considered compatible because it does not fulfil the conditions of the R&R Guidelines.
TS zatrjuje, da pomoč ČSA ne more šteti kot skladna, saj ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.