natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the dumped imports have caused injury to the Union industry to a degree that enables it to be classified as material.
V skladu s členom 3(6) in (7) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali je dampinški uvoz industriji Unije povzročil tolikšno škodo, da se ta lahko opredeli kot znatna.
Known factors other than the dumped imports, which could at the same time have injured the Union industry, were also examined to ensure that possible injury caused by these other factors was not attributed to the dumped imports.
Poleg dampinškega uvoza so bili proučeni tudi drugi znani dejavniki, ki bi lahko hkrati povzročili škodo industriji Unije, za zagotovitev, da se morebitna škoda zaradi teh drugih dejavnikov ne bi pripisala dampinškemu uvozu.
Between 2008 and the IP, the volume of the dumped imports of the product concerned increased by 46 % in a market contracting by 40 %, which resulted in an increase of their market share from 2 % to 5 %.
Med letom 2008 in OP se je obseg dampinškega uvoza zadevnega izdelka na trgu, ki se je skrčil za 40 %, povečal za 46 %, zaradi česar se je njegov tržni delež povečal z 2 % na 5 %.
The increase in dumped imports of the product concerned from the countries concerned over the period considered coincided with a downward trend in all injury indicators of the Union industry, with the exception of market share.
To povečanje dampinškega uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz zadevnih držav v obravnavanem obdobju je sovpadalo s padajočim trendom vseh kazalnikov škode za industrijo Unije razen tržnega deleža.
The Union industry lost 38 % of their Union sales and the sales prices decreased by 11 % due to the price pressure exerted by low-priced dumped imports on the Union market.
Industrija Unije je izgubila 38 % prodaje v Uniji, prodajne cene pa so se zaradi pritiska cenejšega dampinškega uvoza na cene na trgu Unije znižale za 11 %.
The significant price undercutting prevented the Union industry from passing on the increased production costs, which resulted in decreasing and negative profitability levels during the IP.
Industrija Unije ob občutnem nelojalnem nižanju cen ni mogla pokriti povišanih stroškov proizvodnje, zaradi česar so se stopnje dobičkonosnosti v OP znižale in postale negativne.
Based on the above it is provisionally concluded that the low-priced dumped imports from Russia and Turkey are causing material injury to the Union industry.
Glede na navedeno se začasno sklene, da cenejši dampinški uvoz iz Rusije in Turčije povzroča znatno škodo industriji Unije.
During the period considered, there were significant imports from other third countries, including from countries under anti-dumping measures.
V obravnavanem obdobju je bil uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav precejšen, vključno z državami, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi.
The total market share of imports from countries other than Russia and Turkey has decreased between 2008 and the IP from 28 % to 23 %.
Skupni tržni delež uvoza iz drugih držav, razen Rusije in Turčije, se je med letom 2008 in OP zmanjšal z 28 % na 23 %.
The following table shows the development of import volumes, prices and market shares of countries under anti-dumping measures and other third countries, all based on Eurostat data.
V naslednji tabeli je na podlagi Eurostatovih podatkov prikazan razvoj obsega uvoza, cen in tržnih deležev držav, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, in drugih tretjih držav.
Countries under anti- dumping measures
Države, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi
Av. price (EUR)
Povp. cena (v EUR)
Total of all third countries except Russia and Turkey
Vse tretje države skupaj, razen Rusije in Turčije
As indicated in the table above, imports from the eight countries under anti-dumping measures continued to penetrate the Union market although their market share declined from 21 % in 2008 to 17 % in the IP.
Kot je navedeno v zgornji tabeli, je uvoz iz osmih držav, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, še naprej prodiral na trg Unije, čeprav se je njihov tržni delež zmanjšal z 21 % v letu 2008 na 17 % v OP.
The average prices of those imports are generally lower than those of the dumped imports from the countries concerned.
Povprečne cene navedenega uvoza so na splošno nižje od cen dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
Of course, the table above based on Eurostat data shows average CIF prices before the application of duties.
Seveda so v zgornji tabeli, ki temelji na Eurostatovih podatkih, navedene povprečne cene CIF pred dajatvami.
Still, even when the anti-dumping duty is taken into account, the prices of those imports remain low and comparable with the prices of Russian and Turkish imports and are much below the average prices of the Union producers.
Tudi če se upošteva protidampinška dajatev, so cene navedenega uvoza še vedno nizke in primerljive s cenami ruskega in turškega uvoza ter precej nižje od povprečnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
However, it is recognised that the product under investigation has a significant number of different types and the comparison of overall average prices might not be a meaningful indicator.
Vendar se priznava, da obstaja precej različnih vrst izdelka v preiskavi in da primerjava skupnih povprečnih cen morda ni pomemben kazalnik.
At the same time, it is considered that the anti-dumping measures currently in force eliminate the injurious effect of those imports.
Hkrati velja, da se z veljavnimi protidampinškimi ukrepi odpravljajo škodljivi učinki navedenega uvoza.
Consequently, and given that the market share of imports from the countries under measures is declining, it is provisionally concluded that any negative effect of these low priced imports is not such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports from the countries concerned and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Glede na to in glede na zmanjševanje tržnega deleža uvoza iz držav, za katere veljajo ukrepi, se začasno sklene, da kakršen koli negativni učinek tega cenejšega uvoza ni tolikšen, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz zadevnih držav in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
The market share of imports from other third countries declined slightly during the period considered from 7 % in 2008 to 6 % in the IP.
Tržni delež uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav se je v obravnavanem obdobju malce zmanjšal, in sicer s 7 % v letu 2008 na 6 % v OP.
The average prices of those imports are generally higher than the dumped imports from the countries concerned, but somewhat lower than the average prices of the Union producers.
Povprečne cene navedenega uvoza so na splošno višje od cen dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav, vendar malo nižje od povprečnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
Even if the comparison of overall average prices might not be considered a meaningful indicator due to variety of product types, given the declining trend for those imports, it is provisionally concluded that any negative effect of imports from other third countries is also not such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports from the countries concerned and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Čeprav primerjave skupnih povprečnih cen zaradi različnosti vrst izdelka ni mogoče šteti za pomemben kazalnik, se glede na zmanjševanje navedenega uvoza začasno sklene, da kakršen koli negativni učinek uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav tudi ni tolikšen, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz zadevnih držav in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Impact of market contraction and the economic crisis
Vpliv krčenja trga in gospodarske krize
The financial and economic crisis of 2008/09 is in all likelihood the reason behind the decreased consumption for pipe fittings.
Finančna in gospodarska kriza v letih 2008/2009 je najverjetnejši vzrok za zmanjšanje potrošnje pribora (fitingov) za cevi.
The consumption has dropped by over 40 % between 2008 and 2009 and remained at this low level throughout the rest of the period considered (although slightly increasing in the IP).
Potrošnja se je med letoma 2008 in 2009 zmanjšala za več kot 40 % in je ostala na tako nizki ravni do konca obravnavanega obdobja (čeprav se je v OP malce povečala).
Given that fixed costs make up to 40 % of the manufacturing costs of the Union producers, the decreased demand, sales and output result in significantly higher unit manufacturing costs.
Glede na to, da stalni stroški obsegajo do 40 % proizvodnih stroškov proizvajalcev Unije, se zaradi zmanjšanega povpraševanja, prodaje in proizvodnje precej zvišajo proizvodni stroški na enoto.
This obviously has an important impact on the profitability of the Union industry.
To seveda pomembno vpliva na dobičkonosnost industrije Unije.
While recognising that drop in output could have an impact on the situation of the Union industry, especially in 2009 (when the drop actually occurred), it could be reasonably expected that the Union industry would be normally in a position to increase their prices at least in the medium to long term and pass on the cost increase in the following years.
Ob priznavanju, da bi zmanjšanje proizvodnje lahko vplivalo na položaj industrije Unije, zlasti v letu 2009 (ko je dejansko prišlo do zmanjšanja), je mogoče razumno pričakovati, da bi industrija Unije v običajnih razmerah lahko dvignila svoje cene vsaj srednje- in dolgoročno ter v naslednjih letih pokrila zvišanje stroškov.
However, as evident from the dropping Union prices this was not the case, and it is considered that this was not possible due to severe undercutting by the dumped imports.
Vendar se to ni zgodilo, kot je razvidno iz znižanja cen Unije, kot vzrok za to pa se šteje znatno nelojalno nižanje cen zaradi dampinškega uvoza.
Given the above circumstances, it is provisionally concluded that any negative effect of contraction in demand is not such as to break the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports from Russia and Turkey.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih okoliščin se začasno sklene, da kakršen koli negativni učinek zmanjšanja povpraševanja ni tolikšen, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in dampinškim uvozom iz Rusije in Turčije.
In conclusion, the dumped imports from Russia and Turkey have caused the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Sklene se, da je dampinški uvoz iz Rusije in Turčije povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
In this respect, it was found that imports from other third countries, including from countries under anti-dumping measures and the impact of the contraction in demand, although possibly contributing to the injury, do not break the causal link.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav, vključno z državami, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, in vpliv zmanjšanega povpraševanja, čeprav sta mogoče prispevala k škodi, nista prekinila vzročne zveze.
Based on the above analysis, which has properly distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors having an effect on the situation of the Union industry from the injurious effect of the dumped imports, it is provisionally concluded that the dumped imports from the countries concerned have caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgornje analize, pri kateri so bili vsi znani dejavniki, ki vplivajo na položaj industrije Unije, ustrezno ločeni od škodljivega učinka dampinškega uvoza, se začasno sklene, da je uvoz iz zadevnih držav industriji Unije povzročil znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether, despite the provisional conclusion on injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed for concluding that it is not in the Union interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali kljub začasnemu sklepu o škodljivem dampingu obstajajo tehtni razlogi za sklep, da sprejetje ukrepov v tem primeru ni v interesu Unije.
The analysis of the Union interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests involved, including those of the Union industry, importers, and users of the product concerned.
Analiza interesa Unije je temeljila na presoji vseh raznovrstnih vključenih interesov, vključno z interesi industrije Unije, uvoznikov in uporabnikov zadevnega izdelka.
It is expected that if measures are imposed, the price depression and losses will be mitigated and that the sales prices of the Union industry will start to recover, resulting in a significant improvement of the Union industry’s financial situation.
Pričakuje se, da bo uvedba ukrepov ublažila padanje cen in izgube ter da se bodo prodajne cene industrije Unije začele zviševati, s čimer bi se precej izboljšal njen finančni položaj.
On the other hand, should anti-dumping measures not be imposed, most likely the deterioration of the Union industry’s situation would continue.
Po drugi strani se bo finančni položaj industrije Unije najverjetneje še naprej slabšal, če se protidampinški ukrepi ne uvedejo.
In such a scenario, the Union industry would possibly lose market share, as it is not able to follow the market prices set by dumped imports from the countries concerned.
V tem primeru bi industrija Unije lahko izgubila tržni delež, saj ne zmore slediti tržnim cenam, ki jih določa dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav.
The likely effects would entail unnecessary cuts in costs and the closure of production facilities in the Union, resulting in substantial job losses.
Verjetni učinki bi vključevali nepotrebno zniževanje stroškov in zaprtje proizvodnih obratov v Uniji, zaradi česar bi bilo izgubljenih precej delovnih mest.
Taking into account the above factors, it is provisionally concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping measures would be in the interest of the Union industry.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih dejavnikov se začasno sklene, da je uvedba protidampinških ukrepov v interesu industrije Unije.
As indicated above, only two unrelated importers fully cooperated in this investigation by submitting a questionnaire reply.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, sta samo dva nepovezana uvoznika v celoti sodelovala v tej preiskavi in predložila izpolnjen vprašalnik.
Only a small part of the turnover of these two importers was related to resales of the product concerned.
Z nadaljnjo prodajo zadevnega izdelka je bil povezan le majhen delež prometa teh dveh uvoznikov.
Consequently, the impact of the measures is likely to be minimal.
Zato bo učinek ukrepov verjetno minimalen.
Four users have cooperated in this proceeding by submitting a questionnaire reply.
V tem postopku so sodelovali štirje uporabniki, ki so predložili izpolnjen vprašalnik.
None of them imports the product in question from the countries concerned and they all have indicated that impact of the measures, if any, would not be meaningful.
Nihče od njih ne uvaža zadevnega izdelka iz zadevnih držav in vsi so navedli, da učinek ukrepov, če bi ga ti sploh imeli, ne bi bil pomemben.
Given that no user importing from the countries concerned came forward, and in the absence of any information that would indicate the contrary, it can provisionally be concluded that the impact of measures on the user industry’s profitability and economic situation will be rather limited.
Ker se ni javil noben uporabnik, ki bi uvažal iz zadevnih držav, in ni bilo informacij o nasprotnem, se lahko začasno sklene, da bo učinek ukrepov na dobičkonosnost in gospodarske razmere industrije uporabnikov precej omejen.
It can be concluded that the imposition of measures on dumped imports of the product concerned from Russia and Turkey is expected to provide an opportunity for the Union industry to improve its situation through increased sales volumes, sales prices and profits.
Mogoče je sklepati, da bi industrija Unije z uvedbo ukrepov za dampinški uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Rusije in Turčije po pričakovanjih lahko izboljšala svoj položaj s povečanjem obsega prodaje, zvišanjem prodajnih cen in večjim dobičkom.
While some negative effects may occur in the form of cost increases for certain importers, they are likely to be limited.
Sicer so mogoči nekateri negativni učinki v obliki zvišanja stroškov za nekatere uvoznike, vendar bodo ti učinki verjetno omejeni.
Two cooperating Turkish exporters argued that imposition of measures against a small exporting country like Turkey would practically leave the whole Union market in the hands of few producers with a resulting negative impact on the competitive environment.
Dva sodelujoča turška izvoznika sta trdila, da bi bil z uvedbo ukrepov zoper majhno državo izvoznico, kot je Turčija, ves trg Unije dejansko prepuščen nekaj proizvajalcem, kar bi negativno vplivalo na konkurenčno okolje.
It is noted in this regard that as a matter of rule an anti-dumping duty is not meant to be prohibitive and seal off the trade flows from the countries under investigation.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da protidampinška dajatev praviloma ni namenjena prepovedi in ustavitvi trgovinskih tokov iz držav v preiskavi.
Measures are supposed to level the playing field between different market players.
Ukrepi naj bi zagotovili enake pogoje udeležencem na trgu.
At the same time it is noted that on the Union market there are more than 20 European manufacturers and imports from other third countries are significant.
Hkrati je pomemben podatek, da je na trgu Unije več kot 20 evropskih proizvajalcev, uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav pa je precejšen.
Consequently, any reservations with regard to competitive environment on the Union market do not appear to be warranted.
Zato se pridržki glede konkurenčnega okolja na trgu Unije ne zdijo utemeljeni.
In the light of the above, it is provisionally concluded that no compelling reasons exist against the imposition of provisional measures on imports of the product concerned originating in Russia and Turkey.
Glede na navedeno se začasno sklene, da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi začasnih ukrepov za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije.
G. PROVISIONAL ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
G. ZAČASNI PROTIDAMPINŠKI UKREPI
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, provisional measures should be imposed on imports of the product concerned originating in Russia and Turkey in order to prevent further injury to the Union industry by the dumped imports.
Glede na sklepe o dampingu, škodi, vzročni zvezi in interesu Unije bi bilo treba uvesti začasne ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije, da se prepreči nadaljnja škoda industriji Unije zaradi dampinškega uvoza.
The provisional measures on imports originating in the countries concerned should be imposed at a level sufficient to eliminate dumping, without exceeding the level of injury caused to the Union industry by the dumped imports.
Treba bi bilo določiti raven začasnih ukrepov za uvoz s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki bo zadostna za odpravo dampinga, ne preseže pa se stopnja škode, povzročene Uniji zaradi dampinškega uvoza.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it is considered that any measures should allow the Union industry to cover its costs of production and obtain overall a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports.
Pri izračunu zneska dajatve, potrebnega za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, se šteje, da morajo kakršni koli ukrepi industriji Unije omogočiti, da pokrije stroške proizvodnje in na splošno doseže dobiček pred obdavčitvijo, ki bi ga lahko dosegla v običajnih konkurenčnih razmerah, tj. če ni dampinškega uvoza.
Given that the established undercutting margins are in all cases higher than the respective dumping margins and that the Union industry suffered losses in the IP, any calculated injury elimination level would per se be always even higher.
Ker so ugotovljene stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen v vseh primerih višje od zadevnih stopenj dampinga in je imela industrija Unije v OP izgubo, bi bila kakršna koli izračunana stopnja odprave škode kot taka v vsakem primeru višja.
Consequently, it was considered that a detailed calculation of the injury levels is not necessary.
Zato se je štelo, da podroben izračun stopenj škode ni potreben.
In the light of the foregoing and pursuant to Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, it is considered that a provisional anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of the product concerned originating in Russia and Turkey at the level of the lower of the dumping margin and injury elimination level found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule, which is in all cases the dumping margin.
Glede na navedeno in v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe se šteje, da je treba za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije uvesti začasno protidampinško dajatev na ravni nižjih od ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga ali odprave škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve, kar je v vseh primerih stopnja dampinga.
For Russia, in the absence of cooperation by Russian exporting producers, a country-wide dumping margin was calculated as explained in recitals 21 to 31 above.
Ker ruski proizvajalci izvozniki niso sodelovali, je bila stopnja dampinga na ravni države za Rusijo izračunana, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (21) do 31.
For Turkey, given that the level of cooperation was considered to be relatively low, the residual dumping margin was based on a reasonable method leading to a margin which is higher than the highest among the individual margins of the three cooperating companies as explained in recital 49 above.
Ker se je raven sodelovanja štela za sorazmerno nizko, je za Turčijo preostala stopnja dampinga temeljila na razumni metodi, po kateri je stopnja višja od najvišje posamezne stopnje treh sodelujočih družb, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (49).
On the basis of the above, the proposed duty rates are:
Na podlagi navedenega so predlagane stopnje dajatve, kot sledi:
Provisional anti-dumping duty
Začasna protidampinška dajatev
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Stopnje protidampinške dajatve za posamezne družbe iz te uredbe so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev te preiskave.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Zato ustrezajo razmeram, ugotovljenim v navedeni preiskavi v zvezi s temi družbami.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the countries concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatve (v nasprotju z dajatvijo na ravni države, ki velja za „vse druge družbe“) tako veljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki jih proizvedejo družbe in torej posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Za uvožene izdelke, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni izrecno navedena z imenom in naslovom v izvedbenem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ni mogoče uporabiti in zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki velja za „vse druge družbe“.