natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Viable spores of Bacillus subtilis (ATCC PTA-6737)
žive spore Bacillus subtilis (ATCC PTA-6737)
Analytical method [1]Enumeration:
Analitska metoda [1]Metoda štetja:
spread plate method using tryptone soya agar with pre heat-treatment of feed samples.
metoda razmaza na plošči z uporabo sojinega agarja s triptonom s predhodnim segrevanjem vzorcev krme.
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) method.
metoda gelske elektroforeze v pulzirajočem polju (PFGE).
(Weaned) piglets and (weaned) Suidae other than Sus scrofa domesticus
(odstavljeni) pujski in (odstavljeni) prašiči (Suidae) razen Sus scrofa domesticus
For use in (weaned) piglets up to approximately 35 kg.
Za uporabo pri (odstavljenih) pujskih do približno 35 kg
23 April 2023
23. april 2023
Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the Community Reference Laboratory:
Podrobnosti o analitskih metodah so na voljo na naslednjem naslovu referenčnega laboratorija Skupnosti:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 307/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 307/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 308/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 308/2013
concerning the authorisation of a preparation of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30083 and of a preparation of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30084 as feed additives for all animal species
o odobritvi pripravka iz Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30083 in pripravka iz Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30084 kot krmnih dodatkov za vse živalske vrste
In accordance with Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, a preparation of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30083 and of a preparation of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30084 were entered in the European Union Register of Feed Additives as existing products belonging to the functional group of silage additives, for all animal species.
V skladu s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 sta bila pripravek iz Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30083 in pripravek iz Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 30084 vpisana v register krmnih dodatkov Evropske unije kot obstoječa proizvoda iz funkcionalne skupine silirnih dodatkov za vse živalske vrste.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 13 December 2012 [2] that, under the proposed conditions of use, the preparations concerned are considered safe for target species, consumers of products from animals fed treated silage and for the environment.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) je v svojem mnenju z dne 13. decembra 2012 [2] navedla, da zadevna pripravka v predlaganih pogojih uporabe nimata škodljivega vpliva na ciljne vrste, potrošnike proizvodov iz živali, krmljenih s tretirano silažo, in na okolje.
The Authority also concluded that both preparations have the potential to improve the production of silage by increasing the preservation of dry matter and by reducing protein degradation with easy and moderately difficult to ensile forage species.
Agencija je sklenila tudi, da lahko oba pripravka izboljšata proizvodnjo silaže tako, da se izboljša konzerviranje suhe snovi in zmanjša razgradnja beljakovin krmnih rastlin, ki se preprosto do srednje težko silirajo.
The preparations specified in the Annex and feed containing them, which are produced and labelled before 24 October 2013 in accordance with the rules applicable before 24 April 2013 may continue to be placed on the market and used until the existing stocks are exhausted.
Pripravka iz Priloge in krma, ki ju vsebuje, proizvedeni in označeni pred 24. oktobrom 2013 v skladu s pravili, ki se uporabljajo pred 24. aprilom 2013, se lahko še naprej dajeta na trg in uporabljata do porabe obstoječih zalog.
Preparation of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30083) containing a minimum of 5 × 1010 CFU/g additive
pripravek iz Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30083) z najnižjo vsebnostjo 5 × 1010 CFU/g dodatka
Identification: Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE).
Identifikacija gelska elektroforeza v utripajočem polju (PFGE).
Minimum dose of the additive when it is not used in combination with other micro-organisms as silage additive: 1 × 108 CFU/kg of fresh material.
Najnižji odmerek dodatka, kadar se ne uporablja v kombinaciji z drugimi mikroorganizmi kot silirnimi dodatki: 1 × 108 CFU/kg sveže snovi.
24 April 2023
24. april 2023
Preparation of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30084) containing a minimum of 5 × 1010 CFU/g additive
pripravek iz Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30084) z najnižjo vsebnostjo 5 × 1010 CFU/g dodatka
As defined by Commission Regulation (EC) No 429/2008 (OJ L 133, 22.5.2008, p. 1).
Kakor je opredeljena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 429/2008.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 309/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 309/2013
amending for the 191st time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network
o stoenaindevetdeseti spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z mrežo Al-Kaida
On 23 March 2013 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove four natural persons from its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.
Odbor za sankcije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov je 23. marca 2013 sklenil črtati štiri fizične osebe s seznama oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere velja zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov.
‘Abdul Manaf KASMURI (alias (a) Muhammad Al-Filipini, (b) Intan), Klang. Selangor, Malaysia. Date of birth: 28 May 1955. Place of birth: Selangor, Malaysia. Nationality: Malaysian. Passport No: A 9226483. National identification No: 550528-10-5991.’
„Abdul Manaf KASMURI (alias (a) Muhammad Al-Filipini, (b) Intan), Klang. Selangor, Malezija. Datum rojstva: 28. maj 1955. Kraj rojstva: Selangor, Malezija. Državljanstvo: malezijsko. Potni list št.: A 9226483. Nacionalna identifikacijska št.: 550528-10-5991.“;
‘Wan Min WAN MAT (alias (a) Abu Hafis, (b) Wan Halim, (c) Abu Hidayah), Ulu Tiram, Johor, Malaysia; date of birth: 23 September 1960; place of birth: Kelantan, Malaysia; nationality: Malaysian; passport No: A 9703399; national identification No: 600923-03-5527.’
„Wan Min WAN MAT (alias (a) Abu Hafis, (b) Wan Halim, (c) Abu Hidayah), Ulu Tiram, Johor, Malezija; datum rojstva: 23. september 1960; kraj rojstva: Kelantan, Malezija; državljanstvo: malezijsko; št. potnega lista: A 9703399; nacionalna matična številka: 600923–03–5527.“;
Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 9.9.2003.’
Datum uvrstitve iz člena 2a(4)(b): 9.9.2003.“.
Date of birth: 3.7.1968.
Datum rojstva: 3.7.1968.
Place of birth: Selangor, Malaysia.
Kraj rojstva: Selangor, Malezija.
National identification No: 680703- 10-5821.
Nacionalna matična št.: 680703-10-5821.
Date of birth: 16.5.1967.
Datum rojstva: 16.5.1967.
Place of birth: Kelantan, Malaysia.
Kraj rojstva: Kelantan, Malezija.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 310/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 310/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 311/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 311/2013
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of silicon consigned from Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 467/2010 na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz silicija, poslanega iz Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Tajvana ali ne
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission after having consulted the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom predložila Evropska komisija,
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 [2] (‘the original Regulation’) the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 19 % on imports of silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’) for all companies other than the one mentioned in Article 1(2) of that Regulation, following the expiry review and a partial interim review of the measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 [3].
Svet je po pregledu zaradi izteka in delnem začasnem pregledu ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 398/2004 [2], z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 467/2010 [3] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 19 % na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) za vse druge družbe, razen za tisto, ki je navedena v členu 1(2) navedene uredbe.
The original Regulation also maintained the duty which was extended by virtue of Council Regulation (EC) No 42/2007 [4] to imports of silicon consigned from the Republic of Korea whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not.
Prvotna uredba je prav tako ohranila dajatev, ki je bila z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 42/2007 [4] razširjena na uvoz silicija, poslanega iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je bil deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Republike Koreje ali ne.
The measures imposed by the original Regulation are hereinafter referred to as ‘the measures in force’ or ‘original measures’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation is hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Ukrepi, uvedeni s prvotno uredbo, se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenujejo „veljavni ukrepi“ ali „prvotni ukrepi“, preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih s prvotno uredbo, pa se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna preiskava“.
On 15 May 2012, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(3) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of silicon originating in the PRC and to make imports of silicon consigned from Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not, subject to registration.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 15. maja 2012 prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(3) osnovne uredbe, da razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz LRK, ter da uvede registracijo uvoza silicija, poslanega iz Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Tajvana ali ne.
The request was lodged by Euroalliages (Liaison Committee of the Ferro-Alloy Industry) (‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing 100 % of the Union production of silicon.
Zahtevek je vložil Euroalliages (Liaison Committee of the Ferro-Alloy Industry) („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo 100 % proizvodnje silicija v Uniji.
The applicant argued that there is no genuine production of silicon in Taiwan and the request contained sufficient prima facie evidence that following the imposition of the measures in force, a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC and Taiwan to the Union occurred, for which there was no sufficient due cause or justification other than the imposition of the measures in force.
Vložnik je trdil, da v Tajvanu ni prave proizvodnje silicija, ter zahtevek je vseboval zadostne dokaze prima facie, da se je po uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoz iz LRK in Tajvana v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe veljavnih ukrepov ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni upravičena.
That change allegedly stemmed from the transhipment of silicon originating in the PRC via Taiwan to the Union.
Ta sprememba je domnevno posledica pretovarjanja silicija s poreklom iz LRK prek Tajvana v Unijo.
Furthermore, the applicant argued that the evidence pointed to the fact that the remedial effects of the measures in force were being undermined both in terms of quantity and price.
Poleg tega je vložnik trdil, da dokazi kažejo, da je bil popravljalni učinek veljavnih ukrepov oslabljen v smislu količine in cene.
The evidence showed that the increased imports from Taiwan were made at prices below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation.
Iz dokazov je razvidno, da se je uvoz iz Tajvana povečal po cenah, ki so nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
Finally, there was evidence that the prices of silicon consigned from Taiwan were dumped in relation to the normal value previously established for the product concerned during the original investigation.
Dokazi tudi kažejo, da so cene silicija, poslanega iz Tajvana, dampinške glede na normalno vrednost, ki je bila za zadevni izdelek določena v prvotni preiskavi.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated an investigation by Regulation (EU) No 596/2012 [5] (‘the initiating Regulation’) of the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of silicon originating in the PRC and also directed the custom authorities to register imports of silicon consigned from Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Taiwan, or not.
Ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi prima facie za začetek preiskave na podlagi člena 13(3) in člena 14(5) osnovne uredbe, je začela preiskavo z Uredbo (EU) št. 596/2012 [5] („uredba o začetku preiskave“) zaradi morebitnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim za uvoz silicija s poreklom iz LRK, ter carinskim organom tudi odredila, da registrirajo uvoz silicija, poslanega iz Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Tajvana ali ne.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC and Taiwan, the exporting producers in those countries, the importers in the Union known to be concerned and the Union industry of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila pristojne organe LRK in Tajvana, proizvajalce izvoznike v navedenih državah, uvoznike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter industrijo Unije.
Exemption forms were sent to the producers/exporters in Taiwan known to the Commission and through the Authorities of Taiwan to the European Union.
Obrazci zahtevka za izvzetje so bili poslani proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v Tajvanu, ki so znani Komisiji, in prek oblasti Tajvana pri Evropski uniji.
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in the PRC known to the Commission and through the Authorities of the PRC to the European Union.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK, ki so znani Komisiji, in prek oblasti LRK pri Evropski uniji.
All parties were informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and to findings being based on the facts available.
Vse strani so bile obveščene, da se lahko zaradi nesodelovanja uporabi člen 18 osnovne uredbe in posledično pride do ugotovitev na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
Three Taiwanese producers/exporters, belonging to one group, and three unrelated importers in the Union made themselves known and submitted replies to the exemption forms and to the questionnaires, respectively.
Trije proizvajalci/izvozniki v Tajvanu, ki sestavljajo eno skupino, in trije nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji so se javili in predložili izpolnjene obrazce zahtevkov za izvzetje oziroma vprašalnike.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the three following related companies, part of the Group referred to in recital 10:
Komisija je opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih treh povezanih družb, ki sestavljajo skupino iz uvodne izjave 10:
Asia Metallurgical Co. Ltd (Taiwan),
Asia Metallurgical Co. Ltd (Tajvan),
Latitude Co. Ltd (Taiwan),
Latitude Co. Ltd (Tajvan),
YLB Co. Ltd (Taiwan).
YLB Co. Ltd (Tajvan).
The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2012 (‘the IP’).
Obdobje preiskave je trajalo od 1. januarja 2008 do 30. junija 2012 („OP“).
More detailed data were collected for the reporting period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 (‘the RP’) in order to examine the possible undermining of the remedial effect of the measures in force and existence of dumping.
Za obdobje poročanja od 1. julija 2011 do 30. junija 2012 („obdobje poročanja“) so bili zbrani podrobnejši podatki, da bi se preverila morebitna oslabitev popravljalnega učinka veljavnih ukrepov in obstoj dampinga.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was made by analysing successively whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, Taiwan and the Union; if that change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty; if there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the product under investigation; and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the product concerned in the original investigation, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe se je obstoj izogibanja ukrepom ocenjeval z zaporedno analizo, v kateri se je ugotavljalo, ali je prišlo v vzorcu trgovanja med LRK, Tajvanom in Unijo do spremembe, ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dejavnosti, za katero razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega ustreznega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko utemeljena, ali so obstajali dokazi o škodi ali o tem, da je bil popravljalni učinek dajatve oslabljen v smislu cen in/ali količin izdelka v preiskavi, in ali so obstajali dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, ki so bili za zadevni izdelek predhodno določeni v prvotni preiskavi, po potrebi v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned by the possible circumvention is silicon metal, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN code 28046900 (silicon content less than 99,99 % by weight) (‘the product concerned’).
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva morebitno izogibanje, je silicijeva kovina s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN 28046900 (ki vsebuje manj kot 99,99 mas. % silicija) („zadevni izdelek“).
Purely by reason of the current classification set out in the Combined Nomenclature, it should be read ‘silicon’.
Samo zaradi sedanje uvrstitve v kombinirani nomenklaturi bi se moral glasiti „silicij“.
The product under investigation is the same as that defined above, but consigned from Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Taiwan or not, currently falling within the same CN code as the product concerned (‘the product under investigation’).
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak izdelku, opredeljenemu zgoraj, le da je poslan iz Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Tajvana ali ne, ki se trenutno uvršča pod enako oznako KN kot zadevni izdelek („izdelek v preiskavi“).
The investigation showed that silicon, as defined above, exported from the PRC to the Union and silicon consigned from Taiwan to the Union has the same basic physical and technical characteristics and has the same use, and is therefore to be considered as a like product within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da ima silicij, kakor je opredeljen zgoraj, izvožen v Unijo iz LRK, in silicij, poslan v Unijo iz Tajvana, enake osnovne fizične in tehnične značilnosti ter enake uporabe, zato se ga šteje za podoben izdelek v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As stated in recital 10, only three Taiwanese companies belonging to the same group of companies submitted exemption form replies.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10, so samo tri tajvanske družbe, ki so del ene skupine družb, predložile izpolnjene obrazce zahtevka za izvzetje.
A comparison of their exports into the Union to the Eurostat import data, showed that the cooperating companies were representing 65 % of the Taiwanese exports of the product under investigation to the Union in the RP.
Primerjava njihovega izvoza v Unijo s podatki Eurostata o uvozu je pokazala, da so v obdobju poročanja sodelujoče družbe predstavljale 65 % tajvanskega izvoza izdelka v preiskavi v Unijo.
There was no cooperation from the exporting producers of silicon in the PRC.
Proizvajalci izvozniki silicija iz LRK niso sodelovali.
Therefore, findings in respect of imports of silicon from the PRC into the Union and exports from the PRC into Taiwan had to be made on the basis of data from Eurostat import data, Taiwanese import statistics and data gathered from the cooperating Taiwanese companies.
Zato je bilo treba ugotovitve v zvezi z uvozom silicija iz LRK v Unijo in izvozom iz LRK v Tajvan skleniti na podlagi podatkov Eurostata o uvozu, tajvanskih statističnih podatkov o uvozu in podatkov, pridobljenih od sodelujočih tajvanskih družb.
Imports of silicon into the Union
Uvoz silicija v Unijo
Table 1 shows imports of silicon from the PRC and Taiwan into the Union between 2004 and the end of the RP.
Tabela 1 prikazuje uvoz silicija iz LRK in Tajvana v Unijo med letoma 2004 in koncem obdobja poročanja.
(in MT)
(v milijonih ton)
The imports doubled again in 2010, following the imposition of new measures against the PRC.
Uvoz se je ponovno podvojil leta 2010 po uvedbi novih ukrepov proti LRK.
In 2011, the imports into the Union from Taiwan decreased.
Leta 2011 se je uvoz v Unijo iz Tajvana zmanjšal.
This development may be attributable to an anti-fraud investigation which was launched by OLAF around that time.
Ta razvoj se lahko pripiše preiskavi v boju proti goljufijam, ki jo je v približno istem času začel OLAF.
The board of appeal quashed the decision of the BOFT, and the certificates in question were re-issued to those three Taiwanese producers/exporters, but not to the other Taiwanese producers.
Odbor za pritožbe je razveljavil sklep BOFT in zadevna potrdila so bila ponovno izdana tem trem tajvanskim proizvajalcem/izvoznikom, ne pa drugim tajvanskim proizvajalcem.
In this context, the Commission also observes that the presentation of a non-preferential certificate of origin is not required for the customs formalities at importation into the Union and that in the event of serious doubt, such a certificate cannot serve as proof of the non-preferential origin of the declared product (Article 26 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [6]).
V zvezi s tem Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da se pri uvozu v Unijo v okviru carinskih formalnosti predložitev nepreferencialnega potrdila o poreklu ne zahteva in da se v primeru resnih dvomov tako potrdilo ne more uporabiti kot dokazilo o nepreferencialnem poreklu deklariranega izdelka (člen 26 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [6]).
The imports of silicon from the PRC into the Union have been increasing since 2008.
Uvoz silicija iz LRK v Unijo se od leta 2008 povečuje.
Exports of silicon from the PRC to Taiwan
Izvoz silicija iz LRK v Tajvan
Source: Chinese export statistics.
Vir: Statistični podatki Kitajske o izvozu.
Table 2 shows imports from the PRC into Taiwan.
Tabela 2 prikazuje uvoz iz LRK v Tajvan.
The data from the Chinese exports database show that imports were at their highest in 2010 following the imposition of the original measures.
Iz kitajskih podatkov o izvozu je razvidno, da je bil uvoz največji leta 2010 po uvedbi prvotnih ukrepov.
The decrease in 2011 can be explained by the anti-fraud investigation as explained in recital 21.
Zmanjšanje leta 2011 je mogoče pojasniti s preiskavo v boju proti goljufijam, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 21.
It is considered that there is a change in the pattern of trade since there were no imports of silicon from Taiwan into the Union at all in 2004.
Šteje se, da obstaja sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja, saj leta 2004 ni bilo uvoza iz Tajvana v Unijo.