natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation showed that bicycles, as defined above, exported from the PRC to the Union and those consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo kolesa, izvožena v Unijo iz LRK, in kolesa, poslana v Unijo iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične značilnosti ter enake uporabe, zato jih je treba šteti za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Degree of cooperation and determination of the trade volumes
2.3 Stopnja sodelovanja in določitev obsega trgovanja
The four Indonesian companies that submitted a request for exemption in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation represented 91 % of the total imports from Indonesia to the Union during the RP.
Uvoz štirih indonezijskih družb, ki so predložile zahtevek za izvzetje v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, je v obdobju poročanja znašal 91 % celotnega uvoza iz Indonezije v Unijo.
The overall import volumes from Indonesia were established on the basis of the data from Comext [15].
Skupni obseg uvoza iz Indonezije je bil določen na podlagi podatkov COMEXT [15].
The data submitted by one company was unverifiable as the company claimed that it kept no working sheets used to fill in the exemption form.
Podatkov, ki jih je poslala ena od družb, ni bilo mogoče preveriti, saj je družba trdila, da ni imela delovnih listov za izpolnitev obrazca za izvzetje.
Therefore, the company was unable to explain and demonstrate how the reported figures were obtained.
Zato ta družba ni mogla pojasniti in prikazati, kako je pridobila predložene podatke.
Moreover, the data submitted by the company proved to be unreliable as the reported figures that were tested and recalculated on the basis of the bookkeeping available at the company’s premises were found inaccurate (e.g. purchases, production volume).
Poleg tega so se podatki, ki jih je predložila, izkazali za nezanesljive, saj je bilo pri preizkusu in ponovnem izračunu predloženih podatkov na podlagi razpoložljivih knjigovodskih podatkov v prostorih družbe ugotovljeno, da so netočni (npr. nakupi, obseg proizvodnje).
The investigation revealed furthermore that the sales manager of the company was in fact in the same time employed by a Chinese producer of bicycles which was the main supplier of the raw material (bicycle parts) of the Indonesian company.
Preiskava je tudi pokazala, da je bil prodajni direktor družbe hkrati zaposlen pri kitajskem proizvajalcu koles, ki je bil glavni dobavitelj surovine (delov za kolesa) indonezijske družbe.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation, the company was informed of the intention to disregard the information submitted by it and was granted a time limit to provide its comments.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 18(4) osnovne uredbe družba obveščena, da se informacije, ki jih je predložila, ne bodo upoštevale, poleg tega pa ji je bil odobren rok za predložitev pripomb.
The company stated that it was very cooperative by providing all the documents requested apart from the working sheets which allegedly were not requested before.
Družba je navedla, da je svojo pripravljenost na sodelovanje dokazala s tem, da je predložila vse zahtevane dokumente razen delovnih listov, ki domnevno niso bili zahtevani.
However, the working sheets were requested in the pre-verification letter sent to the company prior to the on-spot verification.
Vendar je bila v predpreveritvenem dopisu, ki je bil poslan družbi pred preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem, izražena zahteva po delovnih listih.
Moreover, the company claimed that the calculation of the production and purchases values was affected by wrong explanations from a worker and that the checking of the export transactions was accurate.
Poleg tega je družba trdila, da so na izračun vrednosti proizvodnje in nakupov vplivale napačne razlage nekega delavca ter da je bilo preverjanje izvoznih transakcij točno.
In this regards, it should be pointed out that in spite of several explanations from the workers, in the end it was not possible to reconcile the numbers provided on-spot with the numbers submitted in the exemption form.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da na koncu kljub številnih razlagam delavcev ni bilo mogoče uskladiti številk, zagotovljenih na kraju samem, s številkami na obrazcu za izvzetje.
As concerns the value of the export sales, the reconciliation was indeed accurate.
Uskladitev stanj v zvezi z vrednostjo izvoza je bila dejansko točna.
Furthermore, during the verification visit the workers that participated at the verification were not able to explain the source of the numbers stated in the exemption form nor how the numbers had been compiled.
Poleg tega delavci, ki so bili prisotni med preveritvenim obiskom, niso znali razložiti vira navedenih številk na obrazcu za izvzetje niti kako so bile številke pridobljene.
Moreover, the company confirmed that the sales manager was in parallel working for a Chinese producer of bicycles.
Družba je tudi potrdila, da je direktor prodaje hkrati delal za kitajskega proizvajalca koles.
Therefore, the information provided by the company in question had to be disregarded.
Zato informacij, ki jih je predložila zadevna družba, ni bilo mogoče upoštevati.
Findings with regard to this company were therefore based on facts available in compliance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovitve v zvezi s to družbo so torej temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
The other three companies were considered cooperating.
Druge tri družbe so se štele za sodelujoče.
Malaysia
4.2 Malezija
The sole Malaysian company that submitted a request for exemption in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation represented between 20 % and 30 % of the total imports from Malaysia to the Union during the RP.
Uvoz edine malezijske družbe, ki je predložila zahtevek za izvzetje v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, je v obdobju poročanja znašal med 20 % in 30 % celotnega uvoza iz Malezije v Unijo.
Total imports of bicycles from Malaysia into the Union were established on the basis of the data from Comext.
Skupni uvoz koles iz Malezije v Unijo je bil določen na podlagi podatkov COMEXT.
The company was considered cooperating.
Družba se je štela za sodelujočo.
The six Sri Lankan companies that submitted a request for exemption in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation represented 69 % of the total imports from Sri Lanka to the Union during the RP.
Uvoz šestih šrilanških družb, ki so predložile zahtevek za izvzetje v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, je v obdobju poročanja znašal 69 % celotnega uvoza iz Šrilanke v Unijo.
The overall import volumes from Sri Lanka were established on the basis of the data from Comext.
Skupni obseg uvoza iz Šrilanke je bil določen na podlagi podatkov COMEXT.
One of the companies withdrew its request for exemption during the investigation on the grounds that it had stopped the production of bicycles in Sri Lanka.
Ena od družb je med preiskavo umaknila zahtevek za izvzetje, ker je prenehala s proizvodnjo koles v Šrilanki.
Therefore, data with regard to this company were disregarded.
Zato se podatki v zvezi s to družbo niso upoštevali.
The cooperation of the second company was found to be insufficient.
Sodelovanje druge družbe je bilo po ugotovitvah nezadovoljivo.
The data submitted was unverifiable as the value and volume of parts of Chinese origin purchased by the company could not be reliably determined.
Predloženi podatki niso bili preverljivi, saj vrednosti in količine delov kitajskega porekla, ki jih je kupila družba, ni bilo mogoče zanesljivo določiti.
Moreover, the value and volume of the parts used in the manufacturing process could not be verified as they were purchased by a third party and only consigned to the company for assembly.
Poleg tega vrednosti in količine delov, uporabljenih v proizvodnem postopku, ni bilo mogoče preveriti, saj jih je kupila tretja stran in so bili družbi poslani le za sestavljanje.
The company did not provide any comments.
Družba ni predložila pripomb.
The cooperation of another company was also considered insufficient.
Sodelovanje neke druge družbe se je prav tako štelo za nezadovoljivo.
The information provided could not be verified on-spot as the company withheld essential information.
Predloženih informacij ni bilo mogoče preveriti na kraju samem, saj družba ni zagotovila ključnih informacij.
More specifically, it failed to prepare information explicitly requested prior to the on-spot verification, such as the working sheets or the list of its related companies, thus impeding the verification process.
Natančneje, ni pripravila informacij, ki so bile izrecno zahtevane pred preverjanjem na kraju samem, na primer delovnih listov ali seznama povezanih družb, s čimer je ovirala postopek preverjanja.
On the other hand, the purchase value of parts of local origin as reported by the company was found unreliable, notably as the investigation revealed at least some links between the company and its local supplier of bicycle parts that were going beyond a normal buyers and sellers relationship and which could not be clarified by the company.
Po drugi strani se je ugotovilo, da je družba navedla nezanesljivo vrednost nakupa delov lokalnega porekla, zlasti ker se je v preiskavi med družbo in njenim lokalnim dobaviteljem delov za kolesa pokazalo vsaj nekaj povezav, ki so odstopale od običajnih razmerij med kupci in prodajalci ter jih družba ni mogla pojasniti.
In accordance with Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation, the company was informed of the intention to disregard the information submitted by it and was granted a time limit to provide its comments.
V skladu s členom 18(4) osnovne uredbe je bila družba obveščena, da se informacije, ki jih je predložila, ne bodo upoštevale, poleg tega pa ji je bil odobren rok za predložitev pripomb.
In response, the company contested the findings and submitted further evidence and explanations.
Družba se je odzvala z izpodbijanjem ugotovitev ter predložila dodatne dokaze in pojasnila.
None of the newly submitted evidence could have been accepted.
Nobenega od novih dokazov ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
Firstly, because it could not have been verified anymore since provided after the on-spot visit, In most cases the newly submitted evidence was found to be inconsistent with the explanations and evidence gathered on spot.
Novih dokazov, ki so bili predloženi po obisku na kraju samem, ni bilo več mogoče preveriti, v večini primerov pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da so neskladni s pojasnili in dokazi, zbranimi na kraju samem.
As regards the newly submitted explanations, these were found to be insufficient as they did not address the main outstanding issues, in particular, the missing clarifications regarding related companies.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so nova pojasnila nezadostna, saj niso zadevala glavnih odprtih vprašanj, pri čemer zlasti ni bilo pojasnil v zvezi s povezanimi družbami.
Therefore the information provided by the company in question had to be disregarded.
Zato informacij, ki jih je predložila zadevna družba, ni bilo mogoče upoštevati.
The two Tunisian companies that submitted a request for exemption in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation represented all imports from Tunisia to the Union during the RP as reported in Comext.
Uvoz dveh tunizijskih družb, ki sta predložili zahtevek za izvzetje v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, je v obdobju poročanja po podatkih COMEXT zajemal celoten uvoz iz Tunizije v Unijo.
They were considered cooperating.
Šteli sta se za sodelujoči.
As mentioned in recital 21 above, there was no cooperation from any of the Chinese producers/exporters.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 21, ni sodeloval noben kitajski proizvajalec/izvoznik.
Therefore, findings in respect of imports of the product concerned into the Union, on the one hand, and exports of bicycles from the PRC to Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, on the other hand, were based on facts available in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zato so ugotovitve v zvezi z uvozom zadevnega izdelka v Unijo na eni strani in izvoza koles iz LRK v Indonezijo, Malezijo, Šrilanko in Tunizijo na drugi strani temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe.
With regards to imports to the Union import data recorded in Comext were used.
V zvezi z uvozom v Unijo so se uporabili podatki iz podatkovne zbirke COMEXT.
Chinese national statistics were used as regards the determination of export volumes from the PRC to Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia.
Obseg izvoza iz LRK v Indonezijo, Malezijo, Šrilanko in Tunizijo je bil določen na podlagi kitajskih nacionalnih statističnih podatkov.
Change in the pattern of trade
2.4 Sprememba vzorca trgovanja
Imports into the Union from the PRC, Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia
2.4.1 Uvoz v Unijo iz LRK, Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije
Imports of the product concerned from the PRC into the Union decreased by 38,2 % since 2005, i.e. after the increase of the anti-dumping measures in July 2005, and continued decreasing in the following years.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Unijo se je od leta 2005, tj. po zaostritvi protidampinških ukrepov julija 2005, zmanjšal za 38,2 % in se je v naslednjih letih še naprej zmanjševal.
In total, imports from the PRC decreased by over 80 % in the IP.
Skupno se je uvoz iz LRK v OP zmanjšal za več kot 80 %.
In the RP imports from Indonesia increased by 157 % as compared to 2004.
V obdobju poročanja se je uvoz iz Indonezije povečal za 157 % v primerjavi z letom 2004.
Although imports from Malaysia decreased again in 2011 and during the RP, the import level from Malaysia during the RP still exceeded by far the import level from 2004 before the increase of the anti-dumping measures, i.e. 185158 bicycles as compared to 10749 pieces in 2004 or by 1623 %.
Čeprav se je uvoz iz Malezije leta 2011 in v obdobju poročanja spet zmanjšal, je stopnja uvoza iz Malezije v obdobju poročanja še vedno precej presegala stopnjo uvoza iz leta 2004 pred zaostritvijo protidampinških ukrepov, tj. 185158 koles v primerjavi z 10749 kolesi leta 2004 ali za 1623 %.
Imports during 2008 and 2010 were decreasing, increasing again in 2011 and finally decreasing slightly during the RP.
Med letoma 2008 in 2010 se je zmanjševal, leta 2011 pa spet povečal in v obdobju poročanja spet nekoliko zmanjšal.
During the IP imports from Tunisia increased by 200,3 %.
V OP se je uvoz iz Tunizije povečal za 200,3 %.
Table 1 below shows import quantities of bicycles from the PRC, Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia into the Union from 1 January 2004 to 31 August 2012, i.e. during the IP.
Razpredelnica 1 prikazuje količine uvoza koles iz LRK, Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije v Unijo v OP, tj. med 1. januarjem 2004 in 31. avgustom 2012.
Comext statistics
statistični podatki COMEXT.
(pieces)
(kosi)
Exports from the PRC to Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia
2.4.2 Izvoz iz LRK v Indonezijo, Malezijo, Šrilanko in Tunizijo
Exports of bicycles from the PRC to Indonesia increased first in 2008 (by 56,2 %).
Izvoz koles iz LRK v Indonezijo se je leta 2008 najprej povečal (za 56,2 %).
Finally exports from the PRC to Tunisia were negligible before the increase of the anti-dumping duties.
Izvoz iz LRK v Tunizijo je bil pred povečanjem protidampinških dajatev zanemarljiv.
From 2005 on exports to Tunisia increased significantly reaching a peak in 2008 (from 2534 pieces in 2004 to 389445 pieces in 2008).
Od leta 2005 se je izvoz v Tunizijo znatno povečal, največji pa je bil leta 2008 (z 2534 kosov leta 2004 na 389445 kosov leta 2008).
Table 2 shows exports of bicycles from the PRC to Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia from 1 January 2004 to 31 August 2012, i.e. during the IP.
Razpredelnica 2 prikazuje izvoz koles iz LRK v Indonezijo, Malezijo, Šrilanko in Tunizijo v OP, tj. med 1. januarjem 2004 in 31. avgustom 2012.
Chinese statistics
kitajski statistični podatki.
Production volumes
2.4.3 Obseg proizvodnje
The companies in Indonesia and Tunisia increased their production between 2009 and the RP, by 54 % and 24 % respectively.
Družbe v Indoneziji in Tuniziji so med letom 2009 in obdobjem poročanja povečale proizvodnjo za 54 % oziroma 24 %.
The Sri Lankan companies however have slightly decreased their output during the same period.
Šrilanške družbe pa so v istem obdobju proizvodnjo nekoliko zmanjšale.
Production of bicycles of the cooperating companies in Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia
Proizvodnja koles sodelujočih družb v Indoneziji, Šrilanki in Tuniziji
Production volumes in units
Obseg proizvodnje v enotah
Conclusion on the change in the pattern of trade
2.5 Sklep glede spremembe vzorca trgovanja
The overall decrease of the exports from the PRC to the Union and the parallel increase of exports from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia to the Union and the increase of exports from the PRC to Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia after the increase of the anti-dumping measures in July 2005 constitutes a change in the pattern of trade between the countries concerned, on the one hand, and the Union, on the other hand, within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Skupno zmanjšanje izvoza iz LRK v Unijo in vzporedno povečanje izvoza iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije v Unijo ter povečanje izvoza iz LRK v Indonezijo, Malezijo, Šrilanko in Tunizijo po zaostritvi protidampinških ukrepov julija 2005 pomeni spremembo vzorca trgovanja med zadevnimi državami na eni strani in Unijo na drugi strani v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
Nature of the circumvention practices
2.6 Narava izogibanja ukrepom
The practice, process or work includes, inter alia, the consignment of the product subject to the existing measures via third countries and the assembly of parts by an assembly operation in the Union or a third country.
Praksa, postopek ali dejavnost med drugim vključujejo pošiljanje izdelka, za katerega veljajo obstoječi ukrepi, prek tretjih držav ter sestavljanje delov z dejavnostjo sestavljanja v Uniji ali tretji državi.
The existence of assembly operations is determined in accordance with Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Obstoj dejavnosti sestavljanja izdelka se ugotavlja v skladu s členom 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
The exports of the four initially cooperating Indonesian companies amounted to 91 % of the total Indonesian exports to the Union in the RP.
Izvoz štirih prvotno sodelujočih indonezijskih družb je v obdobju poročanja znašal 91 % celotnega indonezijskega izvoza v Unijo.
For three out of the four initially cooperating companies, the investigation did not reveal any transhipment practices.
Pri treh od štirih prvotno sodelujočih družb v preiskavi pretovarjanje ni bilo odkrito.
As concerns the fourth company, as stated in recitals 29 to 33 above, application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation was warranted.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 29 do 33, je bila v zvezi s četrto družbo utemeljena uporaba člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
The investigation revealed that the company did not own sufficient equipment to justify the volumes of exports into the Union in the RP and, in the absence of any other justification, it can be concluded that the company was involved in circumvention practices via transhipment.
Preiskava je pokazala, da družba ni imela v lasti zadostne opreme, ki bi upravičila obseg izvoza v Unijo v obdobju poročanja, in ker ni nobene druge utemeljitve, se lahko sklene, da je bila družba vključena v prakse izogibanja prek pretovarjanja.
For the remaining exports to the Union there was no cooperation as described in recitals 29 to 33 above.
Kar zadeva preostali izvoz v Unijo, sodelovanja ni bilo, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 29 do 33.
Therefore, in light of the change of the pattern of trade concluded in recital 58 above between Indonesia and the Union within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the findings of one Indonesian company as stated in recital 61 above, and the fact that not all Indonesian producers/exporters came forward and cooperated the existence of transhipment of Chinese-origin products via Indonesia is confirmed.
Zato se ob upoštevanju spremembe vzorca trgovanja, ugotovljene v uvodni izjavi 58, med Indonezijo in Unijo v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe, rezultatov preiskave glede ene indonezijske družbe iz uvodne izjave 61 ter ker se niso javili in niso sodelovali vsi indonezijski proizvajalci/izvozniki, potrdi obstoj pretovarjanja izdelkov s kitajskim poreklom prek Indonezije.
The sources of raw materials (bicycle parts) and the cost of production were analysed for each cooperating company to establish whether any assembly operation in Indonesia is circumventing the existing measures according to the criteria of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako sodelujočo družbo je bila izvedena analiza virov surovin (delov za kolesa) in stroškov proizvodnje, da bi se ugotovilo, ali pri dejavnosti sestavljanja v Indoneziji prihaja do izogibanja veljavnim ukrepom v skladu z merili člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
For three out of the four companies that initially cooperated the Chinese-origin raw materials (bicycle parts) did not constitute 60 % or more of the total value of the parts of the assembled product.
Pri treh od štirih prvotno sodelujočih družb surovine s kitajskim poreklom (deli za kolesa) niso sestavljale 60 ali več odstotkov celotne vrednosti delov sestavljenega izdelka.
It was not necessary, therefore, to examine whether or not the value added to the parts brought in, during the assembly operation, was greater than 25 % of the manufacturing cost.
Zato ni bilo treba preveriti, ali je bila dodana vrednost, za katero se poveča vrednost delov, vnesenih med sestavljanjem, večja od 25 % proizvodnih stroškov.
Consequently, assembly operations were not established with regard to these three companies.
V zvezi s temi tremi družbami izogibanje pri dejavnostih sestavljanja torej ni bilo ugotovljeno.
For the fourth company, Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation was applied as mentioned in recitals 29 to 33 above.
Pri četrti družbi je bil uporabljen člen 18(1) osnovne uredbe, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 29 do 33.
Since the company could not provide reliable data, it could not be established whether it was involved in assembly operations.
Ker družba ni mogla zagotoviti zanesljivih podatkov, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali je bila vključena v dejavnosti sestavljanja.
Therefore, the existence of assembly operations within the meaning of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation was not established.
Zato obstoj dejavnosti sestavljanja v smislu člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe ni bil ugotovljen.
The exports of the sole cooperating Malaysian company amounted to between 20 % and 30 % of the total Malaysian exports to the Union in the RP.
Izvoz edine sodelujoče malezijske družbe je znašal med 20 % in 30 % celotnega malezijskega izvoza v Unijo v obdobju poročanja.
For the remaining exports to the Union there was no cooperation as made clear in recital 34 above.
V zvezi s preostalim izvozom v Unijo ni bilo sodelovanja, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 34.
Therefore, in light of the change of the pattern of trade concluded in recital 58 between Malaysia and the Union within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation and the fact that not all Malaysian producers/exporters came forward and cooperated it can be concluded that the remaining volumes of exports which are not coming from this company can be attributed to transhipment practices.
Zato je ob upoštevanju spremembe vzorca trgovanja, ugotovljene v uvodni izjavi 58, med Malezijo in Unijo v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe in ker se niso javili in niso sodelovali vsi malezijski proizvajalci/izvozniki, mogoče skleniti, da se preostali obseg izvoza, ki ne izvira iz te družbe, lahko pripiše praksam pretovarjanja.
The existence of transhipment of Chinese-origin products via Malaysia is therefore confirmed.
Zato je potrjen obstoj pretovarjanja izdelkov kitajskega porekla prek Malezije.