natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By 31 December 2014, the Commission shall, taking into account information from Member States on the content of phosphorus in consumer automatic dishwasher detergents placed on the market in their territories and in the light of any existing or new scientific information available to it regarding substances employed in phosphates-containing and alternative formulations, evaluate by way of a thorough assessment whether the restriction set out in point 2 of Annex VIa should be modified.
Komisija bo na podlagi temeljite presoje do 31. decembra 2014 ob upoštevanju informacij držav članic o vsebnosti fosforja v gospodinjskih detergentih za strojno pomivanje posode, danih v promet na njihovem ozemlju in glede na vse obstoječe ali nove znanstvene razpoložljive informacije o snoveh, uporabljenih v formulacijah, ki vsebujejo fosfate, ali v nadomestnih formulacijah ocenila, ali bi bilo treba spremeniti omejitve iz točke 2 Priloge VIa.
That assessment shall include an analysis of the impact on the environment, industry and consumers of consumer automatic dishwasher detergents with phosphorus levels above and below the limit value set out in Annex VIa, taking into account matters including cost, availability, cleaning efficiency and the impact on waste water treatment.
Ta ocena zajema analizo vpliva gospodinjskih detergentov za strojno pomivanje posode z vsebnostjo fosforja nad in pod mejno vrednostjo iz Priloge VIa ter upošteva stroške, razpoložljivost, učinkovitost pomivanja ter učinke na čiščenje odpadne vode.
The Commission shall submit that thorough assessment to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Komisija to temeljito oceno predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
In addition, if the Commission, on the basis of the thorough assessment referred to in paragraph 1, considers that the restriction of phosphates and other phosphorus compounds used in consumer automatic dishwasher detergents requires revision, it shall, by 1 July 2015, present an appropriate legislative proposal.
Dodatno, če Komisija na podlagi te temeljite ocene iz odstavka 1 meni, da je treba popraviti omejitev fosfatov in drugih fosforjevih spojin, uporabljenih v gospodinjskih detergentih za strojno pomivanje posode, do 1. julija 2015 predloži tudi ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
Any such proposal must be aimed at minimising the negative impact from all consumer automatic dishwasher detergent products on the wider environment, whilst considering any economic costs as identified in that thorough assessment.
Cilj vsakega tovrstnega predloga mora biti čim večje zmanjšanje negativnega vpliva vseh gospodinjskih detergentov za strojno pomivanje posode na širše okolje, pri čemer se upoštevajo vsi ekonomski stroški, opredeljeni v tej temeljiti oceni.
Unless the European Parliament and the Council, on the basis of such a proposal, decide otherwise by 31 December 2016, the limit value set out in point 2 of Annex VIa shall become the limitation for phosphorus content in consumer automatic dishwasher detergents from the date set out in that point.’;
Razen če Evropski parlament in Svet na podlagi ustreznega predloga do 31. decembra 2016 o tem ne odločita drugače, je mejna vrednost, določena v točki 2 Priloge VIa od datuma, določenega v isti točki, mejna vsebnost fosforja v gospodinjskih detergentih za strojno pomivanje posode.“;
This may also include appropriate measures allowing the competent authorities of the Member States to prevent the making available on the market of detergents or surfactants for detergents that fail to comply with this Regulation.
To lahko vključuje tudi ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi lahko pristojni organi držav članic preprečijo razpoložljivost detergentov ali površinsko aktivnih snovi za detergente, ki niso skladni s to uredbo.
Member States shall notify those provisions and any subsequent amendment affecting those provisions to the Commission without delay.
Države članice nemudoma obvestijo Komisijo o navedenih določbah in o vseh nadaljnjih spremembah teh določb.
Those rules shall include measures allowing the competent authorities of Member States to detain consignments of detergents that fail to comply with this Regulation.’;
Pravila vključujejo ukrepe, ki pristojnim organom držav članic omogočajo zadržanje pošiljk detergentov, ki niso v skladu s to uredbo.“;
the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation is inserted as Annex VIa to Regulation (EC) No 648/2004;
besedilo iz Priloge k tej uredbi se vstavi kot nova Priloga VIa k Uredbi (ES) št. 648/2004;
Annex VII shall be amended as follows:
Priloga VII se spremeni, kot sledi:
in section A, the following text is deleted:
v oddelku A se črta naslednje besedilo:
‘If individual risk-based concentration limits for the fragrance allergens are subsequently established by the SCCNFP, the Commission shall propose the adoption of such limits to replace the limit of 0,01 % mentioned above. Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 12(3).’,
„Če odbor SCCNFP glede na tveganje pozneje določi posamezne omejitve koncentracij dišavnih alergenov, Komisija predlaga sprejetje takih omejitev kot nadomestilo za zgoraj navedeno omejitev 0,01 %. Navedeni ukrepi za spremembo nebistvenih elementov te uredbe se sprejmejo v skladu z regulativnim postopkom z nadzorom iz člena 12(3).“;
section B is replaced by the following:
oddelek B se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Consumer laundry detergents
Gospodinjski detergenti za pranje perila
The packaging of detergents sold to the general public intended to be used as laundry detergents shall bear the following information:
Na embalaži detergentov, ki se prodajajo za splošno uporabo in so predvideni kot detergenti za pranje perila, so navedeni naslednji podatki:
the recommended quantities and/or dosage instructions expressed in millilitres or grams appropriate to a standard washing machine load, for soft, medium and hard water hardness levels and making provision for one or two cycle washing processes,
priporočene količine oziroma navodila za odmerjanje, izražene v mililitrih ali gramih, ki ustrezajo standardni polnitvi pralnega stroja za mehko, srednje trdo in trdo vodo ter za en ali dva cikla pralnega postopka,
for heavy-duty detergents, the number of standard washing machine loads of “normally soiled” fabrics, and, for detergents for delicate fabrics, the number of standard washing machine loads of “lightly soiled” fabrics, that can be washed with the contents of the package using water of medium hardness, corresponding to 2,5 millimoles CaCO3/l,
za močne detergente število standardnih polnitev pralnega stroja z „običajno umazanimi“ tkaninami in za detergente za pranje občutljivih tkanin število standardnih polnitev pralnega stroja z rahlo umazanimi tkaninami, ki se lahko operejo z vsebino embalaže v vodi srednje trdote, ki ustreza 2,5 mmol CaCO3/l,
the capacity of any measuring cup, if provided, shall be indicated in millilitres or grams, and markings shall be provided to indicate the dose of detergent appropriate for a standard washing machine load for soft, medium and hard water hardness levels,
prostornina merilne posodice, če je priložena, se navede v mililitrih ali gramih, na njej pa je označen odmerek detergenta za standardno polnitev pralnega stroja za mehko, srednje trdo in trdo vodo.
The standard washing machine loads are 4,5 kg dry fabric for heavy-duty detergents and 2,5 kg dry fabric for light-duty detergents, in line with the definitions of Commission Decision 1999/476/EC of 10 June 1999 establishing the Ecological Criteria for the award of the Community Eco-label to Laundry Detergents.
V skladu z opredelitvami iz Odločbe Komisije 1999/476/ES z dne 10. junija 1999 o določitvi okoljskih meril za dodelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje detergentom za perilo sta standardni polnitvi pralnega stroja 4,5 kg suhega perila za pranje z močnimi detergenti in 2,5 kg suhega perila za pranje z detergenti za občutljive tkanine.
A detergent shall be considered to be a heavy-duty detergent unless the claims of the manufacturer predominantly promotes fabric care, i.e. low temperature wash, delicate fibres and colours.Consumer automatic dishwasher detergents
Detergent šteje kot močen detergent, razen če ga izdelovalec pretežno priporoča za nego tkanin, na primer pranje pri nižjih temperaturah, pranje občutljivih in barvnih tkanin.Gospodinjski detergenti za strojno pomivanje posode
The packaging of detergents sold to the general public intended to be used as automatic dishwasher detergents shall bear the following information:
Na embalaži detergentov, ki se prodajajo za splošno uporabo in so predvideni kot detergenti za strojno pomivanje posode, so navedeni naslednji podatki:
the standard dosage expressed in grams or ml or number of tablets for the main washing cycle for normally soiled tableware in a fully loaded 12 place settings dishwasher, making provisions, where relevant, for soft, medium, and hard water hardness,
standardni odmerek, izražen v gramih ali mililitrih ali s številom tablet za glavni cikel pomivanja normalno umazane posode v polnem pomivalnem stroju za 12 pogrinjkov, ob upoštevanju, po potrebi, prilagoditev za mehko, srednje trdo in trdo vodo.
OJ C 132, 3.5.2011, p. 71.
UL C 132, 3.5.2011, str. 71.
Position of the European Parliament of 14 December 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 10 February 2012.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. decembra 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije) in odločitev Sveta z dne 10. februarja 2012.
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH), o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije (UL L 396, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37.’;
UL L 204, 21.7.1998, str. 37.“;
Decision as amended by Decision 2011/264/EU (OJ L 111, 30.4.2011, p. 34).’.
Odločba, kot je bila spremenjena s Sklepom 2011/264/EU (UL L 111, 30.4.2011, str. 34).“.
LIMITATIONS ON THE CONTENT OF PHOSPHATES AND OF OTHER PHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS
OMEJITVE VSEBNOSTI FOSFATOV IN DRUGIH FOSFORNIH SPOJIN
Date as of which the limitation applies
Datumi, od katerih veljajo omejitve
Shall not be placed on the market if the total content of phosphorus is equal to or greater than 0,5 grams in the recommended quantity of the detergent to be used in the main cycle of the washing process for a standard washing machine load as defined in section B of Annex VII for water of hard water hardness
Se ne bodo tržili, če je skupna vsebnost fosforja v priporočeni količini detergenta za uporabo v glavnem ciklu pralnega postopka za standardno polnitev pralnega stroja iz oddelka B Priloge VII za trdo vodo enaka ali večja od 0,5 grama
for “normally soiled” fabrics in the case of heavy-duty detergents,
za normalno umazane tkanine v primeru močnih detergentov,
for “lightly soiled” fabrics in the case of detergents for delicate fabrics,
za rahlo umazane tkanine v primeru detergentov za občutljive tkanine.
Consumer automatic dishwasher detergents
Gospodinjski detergenti za strojno pomivanje posode
Shall not be placed on the market if the total content of phosphorus is equal to or greater than 0,3 grams in the standard dosage as defined in section B of Annex VII
Se ne tržijo, če je skupna vsebnost fosforja v standardnem odmerku, kot je opredeljen v oddelku B Priloge VII, enaka ali večja od 0,3 grama.
1 January 2017’
1. januar 2017“
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 13 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years from 19 April 2012.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 13 se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje petih let od 19. aprila 2012.
By 19 July 2016, the Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power.
Komisija pripravi poročilo o prenesenem pooblastilu najpozneje do 19. julija 2016. Prenos pooblastila se ob koncu vsakega obdobja petih let samodejno izvrši in podaljšuje za nadaljnja obdobja petih let, razen če temu nasprotujeta Evropski parlament ali Svet vsaj tri mesece pred koncem vsakega takega obdobja.
“Placing on the market” means the first making available on the Union market. Import into the Union customs territory shall be deemed to be placing on the market.
‚dajanje na trg‘ pomeni prvo dostopnost na trgu Unije, vključno z uvozom na carinsko območje Unije;
A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein.
Sklep začne učinkovati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ali na drug dan, naveden v sklepu.
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 260/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro and amending Regulation (EC) No 924/2009
o uvajanju tehničnih in poslovnih zahtev za kreditne prenose in direktne bremenitve v eurih in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 924/2009
The creation of an integrated market for electronic payments in euro, with no distinction between national and cross-border payments is necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Vzpostavitev enotnega trga elektronskih plačil v eurih, brez razlikovanj med nacionalnimi in čezmejnimi plačili, je potrebna za ustrezno delovanje notranjega trga.
To that end, the single euro payments area (SEPA) project aims to develop common Union-wide payment services to replace current national payment services.
V ta namen želi projekt enotnega območja plačil v eurih (v nadaljevanju: SEPA – Single Euro Payments Area) razviti enotne vseevropske plačilne storitve, ki bi nadomestile obstoječe nacionalne plačilne storitve.
As a result of the introduction of open, common payment standards, rules and practices, and through integrated payment processing, SEPA should provide Union citizens and businesses with secure, competitively priced, user-friendly, and reliable payment services in euro.
Kot rezultat uvedbe odprtih, enotnih plačilnih standardov, pravil in praks, ter s pomočjo enotne obdelave plačil, bi morala SEPA omogočiti državljanom in podjetjem Unije uporabo varnih, uporabniku prijaznih in zanesljivih plačilnih storitev v eurih po konkurenčnih cenah.
This should apply to SEPA payments within and across national boundaries under the same basic conditions and in accordance with the same rights and obligations, regardless of location within the Union.
To bi se moralo uporabljati za SEPA plačila, bodisi znotraj ali izven nacionalnih meja, ob enakih osnovnih pogojih in v skladu z istimi pravicami in obveznostmi, ne glede na njihovo lokacijo znotraj Unije.
SEPA should be completed in a way that facilitates access for new market entrants and the development of new products, and creates favourable conditions for increased competition in payment services and for the unhindered development and swift, Union-wide implementation of innovations relating to payments.
SEPA bi morala biti izoblikovana tako, da bi omogočila dostop za nove udeležence na trgu in razvoj novih produktov ter ustvarila ugodne pogoje za povečanje konkurence na področju plačilnih storitev ter za neoviran razvoj in hitro uvedbo inovacij, povezanih s plačili, po celotni Uniji.
Consequently, improved economies of scale, increased operating efficiency and strengthened competition should lead to downward price pressure in electronic payment services in euro on a ‘best-of-breed’ basis.
Posledično bi morale izboljšane ekonomije obsega, izboljšane operativne učinkovitosti in okrepljene konkurence privesti do splošnega pritiska na cene elektronskih plačil v eurih v smeri njihovega zniževanja, saj predstavljajo boljšo rešitev od vseh, s katerimi konkurirajo.
The effects of this should be significant, in particular in Member States where payments are relatively expensive compared to other Member States.
Učinki tega bi morali biti pomembni, zlasti v državah članicah, v katerih so plačila v primerjavi z drugimi državami članicami razmeroma draga.
The transition to SEPA should therefore not be accompanied by overall price increases for payment service users (PSUs) in general and for consumers in particular.
Prehoda na SEPA zato ne bi smele spremljati splošne podražitve, niti za uporabnike plačilnih storitev nasploh niti konkretno za potrošnike.
Instead, where the PSU is a consumer, the principle of not levying higher charges should be encouraged.
Kadar je uporabnik plačilne storitve potrošnik, bi morali namesto tega spodbujati načelo, da se ne zaračunavajo višji stroški.
The Commission will continue to monitor price developments in the payment sector and is invited to provide an annual analysis thereof.
Komisija bo še naprej spremljala gibanje cen v plačilnem sektorju in se jo pozove, da pripravi letne analize tega gibanja.
The success of SEPA is very important economically and politically.
Uspeh SEPA je zelo pomemben v ekonomskem in političnem kontekstu.
SEPA is fully in line with the Europe 2020 strategy which aims at a smarter economy in which prosperity results from innovation and from the more efficient use of available resources.
SEPA je popolnoma v skladu s strategijo Evropa 2020, ki želi doseči močnejše gospodarstvo, v katerem blaginja izhaja iz inovacij in učinkovitejše rabe razpoložljivih virov.
Both the European Parliament, through its resolutions of 12 March 2009 [4] and of 10 March 2010 [5] on the implementation of SEPA, and the Council in its conclusions adopted on 2 December 2009, have underlined the importance of achieving rapid migration to SEPA.
Tako Evropski parlament v svojih resolucijah z dne 12. marca 2009 [4] in 10. marca 2010 [5] o uresničevanju SEPA kot tudi Svet v svojih sklepih, sprejetih 2. decembra 2009, sta poudarila pomembnost hitrega prehoda na SEPA.
Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market [6] provides a modern legal foundation for the creation of an internal market for payments, of which SEPA is a fundamental element.
Direktiva 2007/64/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. novembra 2007 o plačilnih storitvah na notranjem trgu [6] predstavlja sodobno zakonsko podlago za vzpostavitev notranjega trga plačil, katerega ključni element je SEPA.
Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on cross-border payments in the Community [7] also provides a number of facilitating measures for the success of SEPA such as the extension of the principle of equal charges to cross-border direct debits and reachability for direct debits.
Uredba (ES) št. 924/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o čezmejnih plačilih v Skupnosti [7] prav tako zagotavlja številne poenostavitvene ukrepe za uspeh SEPA, kot so razširitev načela enakih stroškov za čezmejne direktne bremenitve in dostopnost z direktne bremenitve.
Self-regulatory efforts of the European banking sector through the SEPA initiative have not proven sufficient to drive forward concerted migration to Union-wide schemes for credit transfers and direct debits on both the supply and the demand side.
Samoregulativni poskusi evropskega bančnega sektorja v okviru pobude SEPA se niso izkazali za zadostne za uspešno izvedbo usklajenega prehoda na sheme v celotni Uniji za kreditne prenose in direktne bremenitve na strani ponudbe in na strani povpraševanja.
In particular, consumer and other user interests have not been taken into account in a sufficient and transparent way.
Zlasti se niso v zadostni meri in na pregleden način upoštevali interesi potrošnikov in drugi interesi.
The voice of all relevant stakeholders should be heard.
Treba bi bilo upoštevati mnenja vseh zainteresiranih strani.
Moreover, that self-regulatory process has not been subject to appropriate governance mechanisms, which may partly explain the slow uptake on the demand side.
Poleg tega se za ta samoregulativni proces niso uporabljali ustrezni mehanizmi upravljanja, kar lahko delno pojasni počasno sprejemanje na strani povpraševanja.
While the recent establishment of the SEPA Council represents a significant improvement of the governance of the SEPA project, fundamentally and formally governance still remains very much in the hands of the European Payments Council (EPC).
Medtem, ko nedavna ustanovitev Sveta SEPA pomeni bistveno izboljšanje upravljanja projekta SEPA, je v bistvu in formalno gledano upravljanje še vedno pretežno v rokah Evropskega sveta za plačila.
The Commission should therefore review the governance arrangements of the whole SEPA project before the end of 2012 and, where necessary, make a proposal.
Komisija bi morala zato pregledati ureditve upravljanja za celotni projekt SEPA pred koncem leta 2012 in po potrebi pripraviti predlog.
That review should examine, inter alia, the composition of the EPC, the interaction between the EPC and an overarching governance structure, such as the SEPA Council, and the role of that overarching structure.
Ta pregled bi moral med drugim preveriti sestavo Evropskega sveta za plačila, sodelovanje med Evropskim svetom za plačila in krovno strukturo upravljanja, kot je Svet SEPA, in vlogo te krovne strukture.
Only rapid and comprehensive migration to Union-wide credit transfers and direct debits will generate the full benefits of an integrated payments market, so that the high costs of running both ‘legacy’ and SEPA products in parallel can be eliminated.
Samo hiter in celovit prehod na kreditne prenose in direktne bremenitve v celotni Uniji bo omogočil vse koristi integriranega plačilnega trga, s čimer bi lahko ukinili visoke stroške hkratnega vzdrževanja obstoječih in SEPA produktov.
Rules should therefore be laid down to cover the execution of all credit transfer and direct debit transactions denominated in euro within the Union.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti pravila za izvajanje vseh transakcij s kreditnimi prenosi in direktnimi bremenitvami v eurih znotraj Unije.
However, card transactions should not be covered at this stage, since common standards for Union card payments are still under development.
Kljub temu pa v tem trenutku še ne bi bilo primerno vključiti transakcij s karticami, saj so enotni standardi v Uniji za plačila s karticami še v fazi razvoja.
Money remittance, internally processed payments, large-value payment transactions, payments between payment service providers (PSPs) for their own account and payments via mobile phone or any other means of telecommunication or digital or IT device should not fall within the scope of those rules since those payment services are not comparable to credit transfers or direct debits.
Za denarna nakazila, notranje obdelana plačila, plačilne transakcije velikih vrednosti, plačila med ponudniki plačilnih storitev za njihov lastni račun in plačila prek mobilnih telefonov ali katerih koli drugih telekomunikacijskih in digitalnih naprav ali naprav informacijske tehnologije, omenjena pravila ne bi smela veljati, saj te plačilne storitve niso primerljive s kreditnimi prenosi ali direktnimi bremenitvami.