natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Service (trade) name: (trade) name of this certification service,
Service (trade) name: (trgovsko) ime te storitve overjanja,
Service digital identity: An unambiguous unique identifier of the certification service,
Service digital identity (digitalna identiteta storitve): jasen edinstven identifikator storitve overjanja,
Service current status: An identifier of the current status of the service,
Service current status: identifikator trenutnega statusa storitve overjanja,
The current status starting date and time,
datum in čas začetka trenutnega statusa,
Service information extension, when applicable: Additional information on the service (e.g. directly included or included by reference to a location from which information can be downloaded): service definition information provided by the scheme operator, access information with regards to the service, service definition information provided by the CSP and service information extensions.
Service information extension (razširitve informacij o storitvah), kadar je to primerno: dodatne informacije o storitvi overjanja (npr. neposredno vključene ali vključene s sklicem na lokacijo, s katere je informacije mogoče prenesti): informacije o opredelitvi storitve, ki jo zagotavlja upravljavec sheme, informacije o dostopu v zvezi s storitvijo, informacije o dostopu v zvezi s storitvijo, ki jo zagotavlja CSP, in razširitve informacij o storitvah.
E.g. for CA/QC services, an optional sequence of tuples of information, each tuple providing,
Npr. za storitve CA/QC, neobvezen niz terk informacij, pri čemer vsaka terka zagotavlja:
Criteria to be used to further identify (filter) within the identified trust service that precise set of service outputs (e.g. set of (qualified) certificates) for which additional information is required/provided with regards to its status, the indication of the SSCD support and/or issuance to a legal person, and
merila, ki se uporabljajo za nadaljnjo opredelitev (filtriranje) sklopa rezultatov storitve v okviru opredeljene varne storitve, za katero se zahtevajo/zagotovijo dodatne informacije v zvezi z navedbo podpore SSCD in/ali izdajo pravni osebi, ter
The associated ‘qualifiers’ providing information on whether the set of service outputs identifies certificates to be considered as qualified and/or whether the identified qualified certificates from this service are supported by an SSCD or not, and/or information about whether such QCs are issued to legal person (by default they are to be considered as issued to natural persons).
povezane „kvalifikatorje“, ki zagotavljajo informacije o tem, ali sklop rezultatov storitve opredeljuje potrdila, ki se štejejo kot kvalificirana, in/ali so opredeljena kvalificirana potrdila iz te storitve podprta s SSCD, in/ali informacije o tem, ali se takšni QC izdajajo pravnim osebam (načeloma se izdajajo fizičnim osebam).
For each listed certification service, the historical information about his status
Za vsako navedeno storitev overjanja, pretekle informacije o njenem statusu
A signature computed for authentication purposes over all fields of the TL except the signature value itself
Podpis, sestavljen za namene avtentifikacije vseh polj zanesljivega seznama, razen sama vrednost podpisa
Guidelines for editing entries in the Trusted List
Smernice za urejanje vnosov v zanesljivem seznamu
Status information on supervised/accredited certification services and their providers in a single list
Informacije o statusu nadzorovanih/akreditiranih storitev overjanja in overiteljih na enem seznamu
The Trusted List of a Member State means the ‘Supervision/Accreditation Status List of certification services from Certification Service Providers who are supervised/accredited by the referenced Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC’.
Zanesljivi seznam države članice je opredeljen kot „seznam statusov nadzora/akreditacije storitev overjanja s strani overiteljev, ki jih zadevna država članica nadzoruje/akreditira za skladnost z zadevnimi določbami Direktive 1999/93/ES“.
Such a Trusted List is the single instrument to be used by the relevant Member State to provide information on the supervision/accreditation status of certification services and their providers:
Države članice morajo ta zanesljivi seznam uporabljati kot enoten instrument, da zagotovijo informacije o statusu nadzora/akreditacije storitev overjanja in o overiteljih:
all Certification Service Providers, as defined in Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC, i.e. ‘entity or a legal or natural person who issues certificates or provides other services related to electronic signatures’,
vse overitelje, kot so opredeljeni v členu 2(11) Direktive 1999/93/ES, tj. „subjekt, fizična ali pravna oseba, ki izdaja potrdila ali opravlja druge storitve v zvezi z elektronskim podpisom“,
When considering the definitions and provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular with regard to the relevant CSPs and their supervision/voluntary accreditation systems, two sets of CSPs can be distinguished, namely the CSPs issuing QCs to the public (CSPQC), and the CSPs not issuing QCs to the public but providing ‘other (ancillary) services related to electronic signatures’:
Pri obravnavi opredelitev in določb iz Direktive 1999/93/ES, zlasti v zvezi z zadevnimi overitelji (CSP) in njihovimi sistemi nadzora/prostovoljne akreditacije, je mogoče razlikovati med dvema skupinama overiteljev, in sicer overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila javnosti (CSPQC), in overitelji, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil javnosti, temveč zagotavljajo „druge (pomožne) storitve, povezane z elektronskimi podpisi“:
CSPs issuing QCs:
CSP, ki izdajajo QC:
They must be supervised by the Member State in which they are established (if they are established in a Member State) and may also be accredited for compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC, including with the requirements of Annex I (requirements for QCs), and those of Annex II (requirements for CSPs issuing QCs).
Nadzorovati jih mora tista država članica, v kateri imajo sedež (če imajo sedež v državi članici EU), in so lahko akreditirani tudi za skladnost z določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES, vključno z zahtevami iz Priloge I (zahteve za kvalificirana potrdila) in zahtevami Priloge II (zahteve za CSP, ki izdajajo QC).
CSPs issuing QCs that are accredited in a Member State must still fall under the appropriate supervision system of that Member State unless they are not established in that Member State.
CSP, ki izdajajo QC in so akreditirani v državi članici, morajo še vedno spadati v ustrezen sistem nadzora te države članice, razen če nimajo sedeža v tej državi članici.
The applicable ‘supervision’ system (respectively ‘voluntary accreditation’ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Article 3(3), Article 8(1), Article 11, recital 13 (respectively, Article 2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11, recitals 4, 11, 12 and 13).
Veljavni sistem „nadzora“ (oziroma sistem „prostovoljne akreditacije“) je opredeljen in mora izpolnjevati ustrezne zahteve Direktive 1999/93/ES, zlasti zahteve v členu 3(3), členu 8(1) in členu 11 ter uvodni izjavi 13 (oziroma členu 2(13), členu 3(2), členu 7(1)(a), členu 8(1) in členu 11 ter uvodnih izjavah 4, 11, 12 in 13).
CSPs not issuing QCs:
CPS, ki ne izdajajo QS:
They may fall under a ‘voluntary accreditation’ system (as defined in and in accordance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined ‘recognised approval scheme’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in that Directive and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC).
Lahko spadajo v sistem „prostovoljne akreditacije“ (kot je opredeljen v Direktivi 1999/93/ES in skladno s to direktivo) in/ali v nacionalno opredeljeno „priznano shemo potrjevanja“, ki se izvaja na nacionalni ravni za nadzor skladnosti z določbami iz navedene direktive in po možnosti z nacionalnimi določbami v zvezi z zagotavljanjem storitev overjanja (v smislu člena 2(11) Direktive 1999/93/ES).
One single Trusted List must be established and maintained per Member State to indicate the supervision and/or accreditation status of those certification services from those CSPs that are supervised/accredited by the Member State.
Vsaka država članica mora vzpostaviti in vzdrževati enoten zanesljivi seznam, ki navaja status nadzora in/ali akreditacije tistih storitev overjanja s strani overiteljev, ki jih država članica nadzoruje/akreditira.
The Trusted List shall include at least those CSPs issuing QCs.
Zanesljivi seznam mora vključevati vsaj overitelje, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila.
The Trusted List may also indicate the status of other certification services supervised or accredited under a nationally defined approval scheme.
Navaja lahko tudi status drugih storitev overjanja, ki so nadzorovane ali akreditirane po nacionalno opredeljeni shemi potrjevanja.
In the Trusted List, the fact that a service is currently either ‘supervised’ or ‘accredited’ is given by the value of its current status.
Dejstvo, da je storitev trenutno „nadzorovana“ ali „akreditirana“, je podano s trenutnim statusom v zanesljivem seznamu.
In addition to that, a supervision or accreditation status can be positive (‘under supervision’, ‘accredited’, ‘supervision in cessation’), ceased (‘supervision ceased’, ‘accreditation ceased’), or even revoked (‘supervision revoked’, ‘accreditation revoked’) and be set to the corresponding value.
Poleg tega je lahko „nadzorovan“ ali „akreditiran“ status pozitiven („pod nazorom“, „akreditiran“, „nadzor se ukinja“), ukinjen („nadzor ukinjen“, „akreditacija ukinjena“) ali celo preklican („nadzor preklican“, „akreditacija preklicana“) ter se lahko nastavi na ustrezno vrednost.
Figure 1 below describes the expected flow, for one single certification service, between possible supervision/accreditation statuses:
Spodnja slika 1 opisuje pričakovani tok za eno storitev overjanja med možnima statusoma nadzora/akreditacije:
Expected supervision/accreditation status flow for a single CSP service
Pričakovani tok za eno storitev overjanja med statusoma nadzora/akreditacije
Under Supervision
pod nadzorom
Accredited
akreditiran
Supervision in cessation
nadzor se ukinja
Accreditation ceased
akreditacija ukinjena
Supervision ceased
nadzor ukinjen
Accreditation revoked
akreditacija preklicana
Supervision revoked
nadzor preklican
Transit Status when there is an associated supervision model (e.g. for a CSP issuing QC accredited and supervised in the Member State in which it is established),
Prehodni status, ko gre za povezani model nadzora (npr. za CSP, ki izdaja QC, ki je akreditiran in nadzorovan v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež).
Possible Current Status when there is no associated supervision model (e.g. for a CSP accredited in a Member State in which it is not established)
Morebitni trenutni status, ko ne gre za povezan model nadzora (npr. za CSP, ki je akreditiran v državi članici, v kateri nima sedeža).
Possible Current Status
Morebitni trenutni status.
When established in a Member State, a certification service issuing QCs must be supervised (by the Member State in which it is established) and may be voluntarily accredited.
Kadar ima overitelj, ki izdaja kvalificirana potrdila, sedež v državi članici, mora biti nadzorovan (s strani države članice, v kateri ima sedež) in je lahko prostovoljno akreditiran.
The status value of such a service when listed in a Trusted List must have one of the above depicted status values as ‘current status value’ in accordance with its actual status and must change, when applicable, according to the status flow depicted above.
Vrednost statusa takšne storitve, ki je navedena v zanesljivem seznamu, je lahko katera koli od zgoraj prikazanih „vrednosti trenutnega statusa“ v skladu z dejanskim statusom in jo je treba po potrebi spremeniti v skladu z zgoraj navedenim tokom statusa.
However, ‘Accreditation ceased’ and ‘Accreditation revoked’ must both be ‘transit status’ values when the corresponding CSPQC service is listed in the Trusted List of the Member State in which it is established, as such a service must be supervised by default (even when not or no longer accredited); when the corresponding service is listed (accredited) in another Member State than the one it is established in, these values may be final values.
Vendar se morata statusa „akreditacija ukinjena“ in „akreditacija preklicana“ obravnavati kot vrednosti „prehodnega statusa“, kadar je ustrezni CSPQC, naveden v zanesljivem seznamu države članice, v kateri ima sedež, saj morajo biti te storitve nadzorovane že same po sebi (tudi če niso oziroma niso več akreditirane); kadar je ustrezni overitelj naveden (akreditiran) v drugi državi članici in ne v državi članici, v kateri ima sedež, se te vrednosti lahko štejejo za končne vrednosti.
Member States establishing or having established a nationally defined ‘recognised approval scheme(s)’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance of services from CSPs not issuing QCs with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and with possible national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC) must categorise such approval scheme(s) under the following two categories:
Zahteva se, da države članice, ki vzpostavljajo ali so vzpostavile nacionalne opredeljene „priznane sheme potrjevanja“, uvedene na nacionalni ravni za nadzor skladnosti storitev overiteljev, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, z določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES in z morebitnimi nacionalnimi določbami v zvezi z zagotavljanjem storitev overjanja (v smislu člena 2(11) Direktive 1999/93/ES), razvrstijo takšne sheme potrjevanja v naslednji kategoriji:
‘voluntary accreditation’ as defined and regulated in Directive 1999/93/EC (Article 2(13), Article 3(2), Article 7(1)(a), Article 8(1), Article 11, recitals 4, 11, 12 and 13),
„prostovoljna akreditacija“, kot je opredeljena in urejena v Direktivi 1999/93/ES (člen 2(13), člen 3(2), člen 7(1)(a), člen 8(1), člen 11 ter uvodne izjave 4, 11, 12 in 13),
The status value of such a service when listed in a Trusted List must have one of the above depicted status values as its ‘current status value’ (see Figure 1) in accordance with its actual status and must evolve, when applicable, according to the status flow depicted above.
Vrednost statusa takšne storitve, ki je navedena v zanesljivem seznamu, je lahko katera koli od zgoraj prikazanih „vrednosti trenutnega statusa“ (glej sliko 1) v skladu z dejanskim statusom in jo je treba po potrebi prilagoditi v skladu z zgoraj navedenim tokom statusa.
Information on the supervision system applicable to any CSPQC,
informacije o sistemu nadzora, ki velja za katerega koli CSPQC,
Information, when applicable, on the national ‘voluntary accreditation’ scheme applicable to any CSPQC,
informacije, kadar je to primerno, o nacionalni „shemi prostovoljne akreditacije“, ki velja za kateri koli CSPQC,
Information, when applicable, on the supervision system applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs,
informacije, kadar je to primerno, o sistemu nadzora, ki velja za kateri koli CSP, ki ne izdaja QC,
Information, when applicable, on the national ‘voluntary accreditation’ scheme applicable to any CSP not issuing QCs.
informacije, kadar je to primerno, o nacionalni „shemi prostovoljne akreditacije“, ki velja za katerega koli CSP, ki ne izdaja QC.
The last two sets of information are of critical importance for relying parties to assess the quality and security level of such supervision/accreditation systems applied at national level to CSPs not issuing QCs.
Zadnja dva niza informacij sta izjemno pomembna za to, da stranke ocenijo raven kakovosti in varnosti takšnih sistemov nadzora/akreditacije, ki na nacionalni ravni veljajo za CSP, ki ne izdajajo QC.
When supervision/accreditation status information is provided in the Trusted List with regard to services from CSPs not issuing QCs, the aforementioned sets of information shall be provided at Trusted List level through the use of ‘Scheme information URI’ (clause 5.3.7 — information being provided by Member States), ‘Scheme type/community/rules’ (clause 5.3.9 — through the use of a text common to all Member States, and optional specific information provided by a Member State) and ‘TSL policy/legal notice’ (clause 5.3.11 — a text common to all Member States referring to Directive 1999/93/EC, together with the ability for each Member State to add Member State specific text/references).
Če je v zanesljivem seznamu podana informacija o statusu nadzora/akreditacije v zvezi s storitvami overiteljev, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, se zgoraj navedeni nizi informacij vključijo v zanesljivi seznam s pomočjo „Scheme information URI“ (klavzula 5.3.7 – informacije, ki jih zagotovijo države članice), „Scheme type/community/rules“ (klavzula 5.3.9 – s pomočjo besedila, ki je enako za vse države članice, in neobveznih posebnih informacij, ki jih zagotovi država članica) in „TSL policy/legal notice“ (klavzula 5.3.11 – besedilo, ki je enako za vse države članice s sklicevanjem na Direktivo 1999/93/ES, skupaj z možnostjo za vsako državo članico, da doda besedilo/sklice, specifične za državo članico).
Despite the fact that separate bodies of a Member State may be in charge of the supervision and accreditation of certification services in that Member State, it is expected that only one entry must be used for one single certification service and that its supervision/accreditation status must be updated accordingly.
Čeprav so lahko za nadzor in akreditacijo storitev overjanja pristojni različni organi države članice, se pričakuje, da bo za posamezno storitev overjanja uporabljen samo en vnos in da bo njen status nadzora/akreditacije posodobljen v skladu s tem.
Trusted List entries aiming at facilitating the validation of QES and AdESQC
Vnosi v zanesljivi seznam, ki so namenjeni olajšanju potrjevanja QES in AdESQC
The most critical part of the creation of the Trusted List is the establishment of the mandatory part of the Trusted List, namely the ‘List of services’ per CSP issuing QCs, in order to reflect correctly the exact situation of each QC-issuing certification service and to ensure that the information provided in each entry is sufficient to facilitate the validation of QES and AdESQC (when combined with the content of the end-entity QC issued by the CSP under the certification service listed in this entry).
Najpomembnejši del priprave zanesljivega seznama je vzpostavitev obveznega dela zanesljivega seznama, in sicer „seznama storitev“ po CSP, ki izdajajo QC, da se pravilno odrazi natančno stanje storitve overjanja vsakega CSP, ki izdaja QC, in da se zagotovi, da so informacije, posredovane pri vsakem vnosu, zadostne za olajšanje potrjevanja QES in AdESQC (ko so združene z vsebino kvalificiranega potrdila končnega subjekta, ki ga izda overitelj po storitvi overjanja, navedeni v tem vnosu).
The required information might include information other than the ‘Service digital identity’ of a single (Root) CA, in particular information identifying the QC status of certificates issued by such a CA service, and whether or not the supported signatures are created by an SSCD.
Zahtevane informacije lahko poleg informacij o digitalni identiteti storitve („Sdi“) posameznega (korenskega) CA vključujejo tudi druge informacije, zlasti informacije, ki opredeljujejo status QC izdanih potrdil, ki jih je izdal overitelj potrdila (CA), in informacije o tem, ali so bili podprti podpisi tvorjeni s SSCD.
The Body in a Member State that is designated to establish, edit and maintain the Trusted List must therefore take into account the current profile and certificate content in each issued QC, per CSPQC service covered by the Trusted List.
Organ v državi članici, ki je imenovan za vzpostavitev, urejanje in vzdrževanje zanesljivega seznama, mora zato upoštevati trenutni profil in vsebino potrdila v vsakem izdanem kvalificiranem potrdilu, po overiteljih, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila (CSPQC), vključenih v zanesljivi seznam.
Ideally each issued QC should include the ETSI defined QcCompliance [9] statement when it is claimed that it is a QC and should include the ETSI defined QcSSCD statement when it is claimed that it is supported by an SSCD to generate eSignatures, and/or that each issued QC includes one of the QCP/QCP+ certificate policy Object Identifiers (OIDs) defined in ETSI EN 319 411-2 [10].
Najbolje bi bilo, da bi vsako izdano kvalificirano potrdilo vsebovalo s strani ETSI opredeljeno izjavo QcCompliance [9], kadar naj bi šlo za QC, in da bi vključevalo s strani ETSI opredeljeno izjavo QcSSCD, kadar naj bi bilo podprto s SSCD za ustvarjanje e-podpisov, in/ali da bi vsako izdano kvalificirano potrdilo vključevalo eno od identifikacijskih oznak (OID) politike potrdila QCP/QCP+, opredeljeno v ETSI EN 319 411-2 [10].
A specific ‘Service current status’ (‘Scs’) information is associated with this entry.
S tem vnosom je seveda povezana posebna informacija o trenutnem stanju storitve („Service current status“ ali „Scs“).
This is depicted in Figure 2 below.
To je prikazano na spodnji sliki 2.
Listing a service by just providing the ‘Sdi’ of a (Root) CA would mean that it is ensured (by the CSP issuing QCs but also by the Supervisory/Accreditation Body in charge of the supervision/accreditation of this CSP) that any end-entity certificate issued under this (Root) CA (hierarchy) contains enough ETSI defined and machine-processable information to assess whether or not it is a QC, and whether or not it is supported by an SSCD.
Navedba storitve zgolj z navedbo „Sdi“ (korenskega) CA bi pomenila, da je zagotovljeno (s strani overitelja, ki izdaja kvalificirana potrdila, in tudi s strani organa nadzora/akreditacije, ki je odgovoren za nadzor/akreditacijo tega overitelja), da vsako potrdilo končnega subjekta, izdano po tem (korenskem) CA (hierarhija), vsebuje dovolj opredeljenih informacij ETSI v obliki, primerni za strojno obdelavo, da se oceni, ali gre za kvalificirano potrdilo in ali ga podpira SSCD.
In the event, for example, that the latter assertion is not true (e.g. there is no ETSI standardised machine-processable indication in the QC about whether it is supported by an SSCD), then by listing only the ‘Sdi’ of that (Root) CA, it can only be assumed that QCs issued under this (Root) CA hierarchy are not supported by any SSCD.
Če ta trditev ne drži (npr. kvalificirano potrdilo ne vsebuje standardizirane navedbe ETSI v obliki, primerni za strojno obdelavo, o tem, ali je podprto s SSCD), je mogoče zgolj z navedbo „Sdi“ tega (korenskega) CA domnevati samo, da kvalificirana potrdila, izdana po tej (korenski) CA hierarhiji, niso podprta s SSCD.
In order to indicate that those QCs must be considered as supported by an SSCD, the ‘Sie’ field should be used (this also indicates that this information is guaranteed by the CSP issuing QCs and supervised/accredited by the Supervisory or Accreditation Body respectively).
Da se kvalificirana potrdila štejejo za podprta s SSCD, je treba za navedbo tega dejstva uporabiti „Sie“ (to tudi pomeni, da to potrjuje overitelj, ki izdaja kvalificirana potrdila in ga nadzoruje/akreditira organ nadzora oziroma akreditacije).
Service entry for a listed CSP service issuing QCs in the Trusted List
Vnos storitve za CSP, navedenega na zanesljivem seznamu, ki izdaja QC
General principles — Editing rules — CSPQC entries (listed services)
Splošna načela – Pravila za urejanje vnosov – Vnosi CSPQC (navedene storitve)
Service entry for a listed CSPQC:
Vnos storitve za navedeni CSPQC:
“name”
„ime“
Public Key
javni ključ
Structured as a sequence of tuples made of:
Strukturirani kot niz terkov, sestavljenih iz:
“Filtering” elements (e.g. X.509 Certificate Policy extension (OID)) to further determine those (sets) of QC to be covered, and
elementov „filtriranja“ (npr. X.509 Certificate Policy extension (OID)) za nadaljnjo določitev teh (nizov) QC, ki jih je treba vključiti, in
“current status”
kazalniki „trenutnega statusa“,
Indicators expressed as URIs
izraženi kot URI