natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Residual ADR entities are intended to be a safeguard for consumers and traders by ensuring that there are no gaps in access to an ADR entity.
Dopolnilni organi ARS naj bi zagotovili, da pri dostopu do organa ARS ni vrzeli, in tako zaščitili potrošnike in trgovce.
This Directive should not prevent Member States from maintaining or introducing legislation on procedures for out-of-court resolution of consumer contractual disputes which is in compliance with the requirements set out in this Directive.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela preprečevati, da ohranijo ali uvedejo zakonodajo o postopkih za izvensodno reševanje potrošniških sporov na podlagi pogodbenega razmerja, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz te direktive.
Furthermore, in order to ensure that ADR entities can operate effectively, those entities should have the possibility of maintaining or introducing, in accordance with the laws of the Member State in which they are established, procedural rules that allow them to refuse to deal with disputes in specific circumstances, for example where a dispute is too complex and would therefore be better resolved in court.
Da se zagotovi učinkovito delovanje organov ARS, bi poleg tega ti organi morali imeti možnost, da v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri imajo sedež, ohranijo ali uvedejo postopkovna pravila, na podlagi katerih lahko zavrnejo obravnavo sporov v določenih okoliščinah, na primer če je spor preveč kompleksen in bi ga bilo zato bolje rešiti na sodišču.
However, procedural rules allowing ADR entities to refuse to deal with a dispute should not impair significantly consumers’ access to ADR procedures, including in the case of cross-border disputes.
Vendar postopkovna pravila, ki organom ARS dopuščajo, da zavrnejo obravnavo spora, ne bi smela bistveno poslabšati dostopa potrošnikov do postopkov ARS, tudi pri čezmejnih sporih.
Thus, when providing for a monetary threshold, Member States should always take into account that the real value of a dispute may vary among Member States and, consequently, setting a disproportionately high threshold in one Member State could impair access to ADR procedures for consumers from other Member States.
Zato bi morale države članice pri določitvi denarnega praga vedno upoštevati, da se lahko dejanska vrednost spora med državami članicami razlikuje in da bi zato določitev nesorazmerno visokega praga v eni državi članici lahko ovirala dostop do postopkov ARS za potrošnike iz drugih držav članic.
Member States should not be required to ensure that the consumer can submit his complaint to another ADR entity, where an ADR entity to which the complaint was first submitted has refused to deal with it because of its procedural rules.
Države članice ne bi smele biti zavezane zagotoviti, da lahko potrošnik pritožbo vloži pri drugem organu ARS, če je organ ARS, pri katerem je bila pritožba najprej vložena, obravnavo pritožbe zavrnil zaradi postopkovnih pravil.
In such cases Member States should be deemed to have fulfilled their obligation to ensure full coverage of ADR entities.
V takih primerih bi moralo veljati, da so države članice izpolnile svojo obveznost zagotavljanja polne pokritosti z organi ARS.
This Directive should allow traders established in a Member State to be covered by an ADR entity which is established in another Member State.
Ta direktiva bi morala omogočati, da bi trgovce, ki imajo sedež v eni državi članici, pokrival organ ARS, ki je ustanovljen v drugi državi članici.
In order to improve the coverage of and consumer access to ADR across the Union, Member States should have the possibility of deciding to rely on ADR entities established in another Member State or regional, transnational or pan-European ADR entities, where traders from different Member States are covered by the same ADR entity.
Da bi izboljšali pokritost in dostop potrošnikov do ARS po vsej Uniji, bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da se odločijo, da bodo uporabile organe ARS s sedežem v drugi državi članici ali regionalne, nadnacionalne ali vseevropske organe ARS, pri čemer trgovce iz različnih držav članic krije isti organ ARS.
Recourse to ADR entities established in another Member State or to transnational or pan-European ADR entities should, however, be without prejudice to Member States’ responsibility to ensure full coverage by and access to ADR entities.
Uporaba organov ARS s sedežem v drugi državi članici ali nadnacionalnih ali vseevropskih organov ARS pa ne bi smela vplivati na odgovornost držav članic, da zagotovijo polno pokritost in dostop do organov ARS.
This Directive should be without prejudice to Member States maintaining or introducing ADR procedures dealing jointly with identical or similar disputes between a trader and several consumers.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v možnost držav članic, da ohranijo ali uvedejo postopke ARS za skupno obravnavo enakih ali podobnih sporov med trgovcem in več potrošniki.
Comprehensive impact assessments should be carried out on collective out-of-court settlements before such settlements are proposed at Union level.
Preden se na ravni Unije predlagajo skupinske izvensodne poravnave, bi bilo treba opraviti celovite ocene učinka takih poravnav.
The existence of an effective system for collective claims and easy recourse to ADR should be complementary and they should not be mutually exclusive procedures.
Učinkovit sistem skupinskih zahtevkov in preprosta uporaba ARS bi morala biti dopolnilna in ne medsebojno izključujoča postopka.
The processing of information relating to disputes covered by this Directive should comply with the rules on the protection of personal data laid down in the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States adopted pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [8].
Obdelava informacij v zvezi s spori, ki jih zajema ta direktiva, bi morala potekati v skladu s pravili o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki jih določajo zakoni in drugi predpisi držav članic, sprejeti v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [8].
Confidentiality and privacy should be respected at all times during the ADR procedure.
Ves čas trajanja postopka ARS bi bilo treba spoštovati zaupnost in zasebnost.
Member States should be encouraged to protect the confidentiality of ADR procedures in any subsequent civil or commercial judicial proceedings or arbitration.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati k varovanju zaupnosti postopkov ARS v vseh nadaljnjih civilnih ali gospodarskih sodnih postopkih ali pri arbitraži.
Member States should nevertheless ensure that ADR entities make publicly available any systematic or significant problems that occur frequently and lead to disputes between consumers and traders.
Države članice bi morale kljub temu zagotoviti, da organi ARS objavijo morebitne sistematične ali bistvene težave, ki se pogosto pojavljajo in povzročajo spore med potrošniki in trgovci.
The information communicated in this regard could be accompanied by recommendations as to how such problems can be avoided or resolved in future, in order to raise traders’ standards and to facilitate the exchange of information and best practices.
Informacijam, ki se sporočijo v zvezi s tem, bi se lahko priložila priporočila, kako je mogoče podobne težave v prihodnje preprečiti ali jih rešiti, da bi se dvignili standardi trgovcev in bi se olajšala izmenjava informacij in najboljših praks.
Member States should ensure that ADR entities resolve disputes in a manner that is fair, practical and proportionate to both the consumer and the trader, on the basis of an objective assessment of the circumstances in which the complaint is made and with due regard to the rights of the parties.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da bodo organi ARS spore reševali na pravičen, praktičen in sorazmeren način tako glede potrošnika kot trgovca, na podlagi nepristranske ocene okoliščin pritožbe in ob ustreznem upoštevanju pravic strank.
The independence and integrity of ADR entities is crucial in order to gain Union citizens’ trust that ADR mechanisms will offer them a fair and independent outcome.
Neodvisnost in integriteta organov ARS je bistvena, da državljani Unije začnejo zaupati, da jim bodo mehanizmi ARS ponudili pravičen in neodvisen izid.
The natural person or collegial body in charge of ADR should be independent of all those who might have an interest in the outcome and should have no conflict of interest which could impede him or it from reaching a decision in a fair, impartial and independent manner.
Fizična oseba ali kolegij, odgovorna za ARS, bi morala biti neodvisna od vseh tistih, ki bi lahko imeli koristi pri izidu, in ne bi smela biti v navzkrižju interesov, ki bi ju lahko oviralo pri sprejemanju odločitve na pravičen, nepristranski in neodvisen način.
The natural persons in charge of ADR should only be considered impartial if they cannot be subject to pressure that potentially influences their attitude towards the dispute.
Fizične osebe, odgovorne za ARS, bi morale šteti za nepristranske le, če se nad njimi ne more izvajati pritisk, ki bi lahko vplival na njihov odnos do spora.
In order to ensure the independence of their actions, those persons should also be appointed for a sufficient duration, and should not be subject to any instructions from either party or their representative.
Da se zagotovi neodvisnost njihovega delovanja, bi morale te osebe biti imenovane tudi za dovolj dolgo obdobje in ne bi smele prejemati navodil nobene od strank ali njunih zastopnikov.
In order to ensure the absence of any conflict of interest, natural persons in charge of ADR should disclose any circumstances that might affect their independence and impartiality or give rise to a conflict of interest with either party to the dispute they are asked to resolve.
Da se prepreči navzkrižje interesov, bi morale fizične osebe, odgovorne za ARS, razkriti vse okoliščine, ki bi lahko vplivale na njihovo neodvisnost in nepristranskost ali povzročile navzkrižje interesov s katero koli od strank v sporu, ki naj bi ga razrešile.
This could be any financial interest, direct or indirect, in the outcome of the ADR procedure or any personal or business relationship with one or more of the parties during the three years prior to assuming the post, including any capacity other than for the purposes of ADR in which the person concerned has acted for one or more of the parties, for a professional organisation or a business association of which one of the parties is a member or for any other member thereof.
To so lahko morebitni neposredni ali posredni finančni interesi pri izidu postopka ARS ali morebitno osebno ali poslovno razmerje z eno ali več strankami v treh letih pred prevzemom funkcije, vključno z morebitnim delom, ki ni bilo povezano z ARS, ki ga je zadevna oseba opravljala za eno ali več strank, poklicno organizacijo ali poslovno združenje, v katerega je včlanjena ena stranka, ali za katerega koli člana te organizacije ali združenja.
There is a particular need to ensure the absence of such pressure where the natural persons in charge of ADR are employed or receive any form of remuneration from the trader.
Neizvajanje takšnega pritiska je treba zagotoviti zlasti v primeru, ko so fizične osebe, odgovorne za ARS, zaposlene ali prejemajo kakršno koli obliko plačila pri trgovcu.
Therefore, specific requirements should be provided for in the event that Member States decide to allow dispute resolution procedures in such cases to qualify as ADR procedures under this Directive.
Zato bi bilo zato treba določiti posebne zahteve za primere, kadar države članice odločijo, da bodo dovolile, da se postopki reševanja sporov v takih primerih štejejo za postopke ARS na podlagi te direktive.
Where natural persons in charge of ADR are employed or receive any form of remuneration exclusively from a professional organisation or a business association of which the trader is a member, they should have at their disposal a separate and dedicated budget sufficient to fulfil their tasks.
Fizične osebe, odgovorne za ARS, ki so zaposlene ali prejemajo kakršno koli obliko plačila izključno pri poklicni organizaciji ali poslovnem združenju, v katero je včlanjen trgovec, bi morale razpolagati z ločenim in namenskim proračunom, ki zadošča za opravljanje njihovih nalog.
It is essential for the success of ADR, in particular in order to ensure the necessary trust in ADR procedures, that the natural persons in charge of ADR possess the necessary expertise, including a general understanding of law.
Za uspešno delovanje sistema ARS, zlasti za zagotovitev potrebnega zaupanja v njegove postopke, je bistveno, da imajo fizične osebe, odgovorne za ARS, potrebno strokovno znanje, vključno s splošnim poznavanjem prava.
In particular, those persons should have sufficient general knowledge of legal matters in order to understand the legal implications of the dispute, without being obliged to be a qualified legal professional.
Navedene osebe bi morale imeti zlasti dovolj splošnega znanja s pravnega področja, da bi razumele pravne posledice spora, ni pa nujno, da so kvalificirani pravniki.
The applicability of certain quality principles to ADR procedures strengthens both consumers’ and traders’ confidence in such procedures.
Z uporabo določenih načel kakovosti pri postopkih ARS se krepi tako zaupanje potrošnikov kot zaupanje trgovcev v takšne postopke.
Such quality principles were first developed at Union level in Recommendations 98/257/EC and 2001/310/EC.
Takšna načela kakovosti so bila na ravni Unije prvič oblikovana v priporočilih 98/257/ES in 2001/310/ES.
By making some of the principles established in those Commission Recommendations binding, this Directive establishes a set of quality requirements which apply to all ADR procedures carried out by an ADR entity which has been notified to the Commission.
Ta direktiva določa sklop zahtev kakovosti, ki se uporabljajo za vse postopke ARS, ki jih izvaja organ ARS, priglašen Komisiji, in tako nekaterim načelom iz navedenih priporočil Komisije daje zavezujočo naravo.
This Directive should establish quality requirements of ADR entities, which should ensure the same level of protection and rights for consumers in both domestic and cross-border disputes.
Ta direktiva bi morala določiti zahteve kakovosti za organe ARS, ki bi morali zagotavljati enako raven varstva in pravic potrošnikov tako v domačih kot čezmejnih sporih.
This Directive should not prevent Member States from adopting or maintaining rules that go beyond what is provided for in this Directive.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela preprečiti, da sprejmejo nova ali ohranijo veljavna pravila, ki presegajo določbe te direktive.
ADR entities should be accessible and transparent.
Organi ARS bi morali biti dostopni in pregledni.
In order to ensure the transparency of ADR entities and of ADR procedures it is necessary that the parties receive the clear and accessible information they need in order to take an informed decision before engaging in an ADR procedure.
Za zagotovitev preglednosti organov ARS in postopkov ARS morata stranki prejeti jasne in dostopne informacije, ki jih potrebujeta, da bi pred sodelovanjem v postopku ARS lahko sprejeli zavestno odločitev.
The provision of such information to traders should not be required where their participation in ADR procedures is mandatory under national law.
Zagotavljanje teh informacij trgovcem se ne bi smelo zahtevati, če morajo trgovci na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje obvezno sodelovati v postopkih ARS.
A properly functioning ADR entity should conclude online and offline dispute resolution proceedings expeditiously within a timeframe of 90 calendar days starting on the date on which the ADR entity has received the complete complaint file including all relevant documentation pertaining to that complaint, and ending on the date on which the outcome of the ADR procedure is made available.
Ustrezno delujoč organ ARS bi moral postopke spletnih in nespletnih sporov zaključiti hitro v roku 90 koledarskih dni, ki se začne z datumom, ko je organ ARS prejel popoln spis s pritožbo, vključno z vso ustrezno dokumentacijo, povezano s to pritožbo, in konča z datumom, ko je izid postopka ARS dan na voljo.
The ADR entity which has received a complaint should notify the parties after receiving all the documents necessary to carry out the ADR procedure.
Organ ARS, ki prejme pritožbo, bi moral stranki uradno obvestiti, ko prejme vse dokumente, potrebne za izvedbo postopka ARS.
In certain exceptional cases of a highly complex nature, including where one of the parties is unable, on justified grounds, to take part in the ADR procedure, ADR entities should be able to extend the timeframe for the purpose of undertaking an examination of the case in question.
V nekaterih izjemnih zelo kompleksnih primerih, vključno kadar ena od strank iz utemeljenih razlogov ne more sodelovati v postopku ARS, bi morali organi ARS imeti možnost podaljšanja roka, da bi lahko opravili raziskavo zadevnega primera.
The parties should be informed of any such extension, and of the expected approximate length of time that will be needed for the conclusion of the dispute.
Stranki bi bilo treba obvestiti o morebitnem podaljšanju tega roka in o približnem času, ki bo po pričakovanju potreben za rešitev spora.
ADR procedures should preferably be free of charge for the consumer.
Postopki ARS bi morali biti za potrošnika po možnosti brezplačni.
In the event that costs are applied, the ADR procedure should be accessible, attractive and inexpensive for consumers.
Če so s postopkom ARS povezani stroški, bi moral biti postopek za potrošnike dostopen, privlačen in poceni.
To that end, costs should not exceed a nominal fee.
Stroški zato ne bi smeli presegati simbolične cene.
ADR procedures should be fair so that the parties to a dispute are fully informed about their rights and the consequences of the choices they make in the context of an ADR procedure.
Postopki ARS bi morali biti pravični, tako da sta stranki v sporu obveščeni o vseh svojih pravicah in o vseh posledicah odločitev, ki jih sprejmeta v okviru postopka ARS.
ADR entities should inform consumers of their rights before they agree to or follow a proposed solution.
Organi ARS bi morali potrošnike obvestiti o njihovih pravicah, preden se ti strinjajo s predlagano rešitvijo ali jo upoštevajo.
Both parties should also be able to submit their information and evidence without being physically present.
Obe stranki bi tudi morali imeti možnost predložiti svoje informacije in dokaze, ne da bi bili fizično prisotni.
An agreement between a consumer and a trader to submit complaints to an ADR entity should not be binding on the consumer if it was concluded before the dispute has materialised and if it has the effect of depriving the consumer of his right to bring an action before the courts for the settlement of the dispute.
Dogovor med potrošnikom in trgovcem o vložitvi pritožbe pri organu ARS za potrošnika ne bi smel biti zavezujoč, če je bil sklenjen pred nastankom spora, in če je potrošnik s tem prikrajšan za pravico, da za rešitev spora vloži tožbo na sodišču.
Furthermore, in ADR procedures which aim at resolving the dispute by imposing a solution, the solution imposed should be binding on the parties only if they were informed of its binding nature in advance and specifically accepted this.
Poleg tega bi morala biti v postopkih ARS, katerih cilj je rešitev spora z naložitvijo rešitve, naložena rešitev za stranki zavezujoča le, če sta bili vnaprej obveščeni o njeni zavezujoči naravi in sta v to izrecno privolili.
Specific acceptance by the trader should not be required if national rules provide that such solutions are binding on traders.
Izrecna privolitev trgovca ne bi smela biti potrebna, če nacionalni predpisi določajo, da so take rešitve za trgovce zavezujoče.
In ADR procedures which aim at resolving the dispute by imposing a solution on the consumer, in a situation where there is no conflict of laws, the solution imposed should not result in the consumer being deprived of the protection afforded to him by the provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement by virtue of the law of the Member State where the consumer and the trader are habitually resident.
V postopkih ARS, katerih cilj je rešitev spora z naložitvijo rešitve potrošniku, in kadar ni kolizije zakonov, naložena rešitev ne bi smela povzročiti, da je potrošnik prikrajšan za zaščito, ki mu jo zagotavljajo določbe, od katerih ni mogoče odstopati z dogovorom v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri imata potrošnik in trgovec običajno prebivališče.
In a situation involving a conflict of laws, where the law applicable to the sales or service contract is determined in accordance with Article 6(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) [9], the solution imposed by the ADR entity should not result in the consumer being deprived of the protection afforded to him by the provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement by virtue of the law of the Member State in which the consumer is habitually resident.
Če pride do kolizije zakonov in se pravo, ki se uporablja za pogodbo o prodaji ali pogodbo o storitvah, določi v skladu s členom 6(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja (Rim I) [9], rešitev, ki jo naloži organ ARS, ne bi smela povzročiti, da je potrošnik prikrajšan za zaščito, ki mu jo zagotavljajo določbe, od katerih ni mogoče odstopati z dogovorom v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri ima potrošnik običajno prebivališče.
In a situation involving a conflict of laws, where the law applicable to the sales or service contract is determined in accordance with Article 5(1) to (3) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations [10], the solution imposed by the ADR entity should not result in the consumer being deprived of the protection afforded to the consumer by the mandatory rules of the law of the Member State in which the consumer is habitually resident.
Če pride do kolizije zakonov in se pravo, ki se uporablja za pogodbo o prodaji ali pogodbo o storitvah, določi v skladu s členom 5(1) do (3) Rimske konvencije z dne 19. junija 1980 o uporabi prava v pogodbenih obligacijskih razmerjih [10], rešitev, ki jo naloži organ ARS, ne bi smela povzročiti, da je potrošnik prikrajšan za zaščito, ki mu jo zagotavljajo obvezni predpisi po pravu države članice, v kateri ima običajno prebivališče.
The right to an effective remedy and the right to a fair trial are fundamental rights laid down in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in nepristranskega sodišča je temeljna pravica, ki jo določa člen 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
In cases where a dispute could not be resolved through a given ADR procedure whose outcome is not binding, the parties should subsequently not be prevented from initiating judicial proceedings in relation to that dispute.
Kadar spora z določenim postopkom ARS, katerega izid ni zavezujoč, ni bilo mogoče rešiti, strankama ne bi smelo biti onemogočeno, da nato začneta sodni postopek v zvezi s tem sporom.
Member States should be free to choose the appropriate means to achieve this objective.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da izberejo ustrezne načine za dosego tega cilja.
They should have the possibility to provide, inter alia, that limitation or prescription periods do not expire during an ADR procedure.
Med drugim bi morale imeti možnost določiti, da se zastaralni ali prekluzivni roki med postopkom ARS ne iztečejo.
In order to function efficiently, ADR entities should have sufficient human, material and financial resources at their disposal.
Za učinkovito delovanje bi morali imeti organi ARS na voljo zadostne človeške, materialne in finančne vire.