natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission, with the involvement of the European External Action Service, has assessed that the overall economic and political situation requires removing Syria from Annex III to Decision No 1080/2011/EU, which sets out the list of countries eligible for EIB financing under EU guarantee,
Komisija je v sodelovanju z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje ocenila, da splošne gospodarske in politične razmere zahtevajo odstranitev Sirije iz Priloge III k Sklepu št. 1080/2011/EU, ki navaja seznam držav, upravičenih do financiranja EIB z jamstvom EU.
In point B(1) of Annex III to Decision No 1080/2011/EU, the word ‘Syria’ is deleted.
V točki B(1) Priloge III k Sklepu št. 1080/2011/EU se beseda „Sirija“ izbriše.
Done at Brussels, 8 February 2012.
V Bruslju, 8. februarja 2012
OJ L 280, 27.10.2011, p. 1.
UL L 280, 27.10.2011, str. 1.
3091st Foreign Affairs Council meeting.
seja Sveta za zunanje zadeve.
3124th Foreign Affairs Council meeting.
seja Sveta za zunanje zadeve.
OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.
UL L 16, 19.1.2012, str. 1.
of 20 April 2012
z dne 20. aprila 2012
amending Implementing Decision 2011/861/EU on a temporary derogation from rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Kenya with regard to tuna loins
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2011/861/EU o začasnem odstopanju od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge II k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1528/2007 zaradi upoštevanja posebnih razmer v Keniji v zvezi s fileti tuna
On 19 December 2011 the Commission adopted Implementing Decision 2011/861/EU [2], granting a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Kenya with regard to tuna loins.
Dne 19. decembra 2011 je Komisija sprejela Izvedbeni sklep 2011/861/EU [2], s katerim je odobrila začasno odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zaradi upoštevanja posebnih razmer v Keniji v zvezi s fileti tuna.
On 1 December 2011, in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007, Kenya requested a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex.
Kenija je 1. decembra 2011 v skladu s členom 36 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zahtevala novo odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz navedene priloge.
On 16 January 2012 Kenya submitted additional information to its request.
Kenija je 16. januarja 2012 predložila dodatne informacije v zvezi z zahtevkom.
According to the information provided by Kenya, catches of raw originating tuna are unusually low even compared to the normal seasonal variations which has led to a decrease in production of tuna loins.
Po podatkih Kenije je ulov surovega tuna s poreklom nenavadno majhen celo v primerjavi z običajnimi sezonskimi nihanji, kar je privedlo do zmanjšanja proizvodnje filetov tuna.
Kenya has pointed out the risk involved due to piracy during the supply of raw tuna.
Kenija je izpostavila tveganje zaradi piratstva pri dobavi surovega tuna.
This abnormal situation still makes it impossible for Kenya to comply with the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 during a certain period.
Zaradi teh neobičajnih razmer Kenija v določenem obdobju še vedno ne more izpolnjevati pravil o poreklu iz Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007.
A new derogation should be granted with effect from 1 January 2012.
Odobriti je treba novo odstopanje z začetkom veljavnosti od 1. januarja 2012.
Implementing Decision 2011/861/EU should therefore be extended from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013.
Veljavnost Izvedbenega sklepa 2011/861/EU je zato treba podaljšati od 1. januarja 2012 do 31. decembra 2013.
It would be inappropriate to grant derogations in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 which exceed the annual quota granted to the territory of the East African Community under the EAC-EU Interim Economic Partnership Agreement.
Neprimerno bi bilo odobriti odstopanja v skladu s členom 36 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007, ki presegajo letno kvoto, odobreno za regijo Vzhodnoafriške skupnosti v okviru Začasnega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu EAC-EU.
The quota amounts for 2012 and 2013 should therefore be set at 2000 tonnes of tuna loins yearly.
Višino kvot za leti 2012 in 2013 je treba določiti na 2000 ton filetov tuna letno.
In the interest of clarity, it is appropriate to set out explicitly that the only non-originating materials to be used for the manufacture of tuna loins of CN code 16041416 should be tuna of HS Headings 0302 or 0303, in order for the tuna loins to benefit from the derogation.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba izrecno določiti, da so do odstopanja upravičeni zgolj fileti tuna z oznako KN 16041416, proizvedeni iz tuna iz tarifne številke HS 0302 ali 0303 brez porekla.
Implementing Decision 2011/861/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeni sklep 2011/861/EU je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Implementing Decision 2011/861/EU is amended as follows:
Izvedbeni sklep 2011/861/EU se spremeni:
By way of derogation from Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 and in accordance with Article 36(1)(a) of that Annex, tuna loins of CN code 16041416 manufactured from non-originating tuna of HS Headings 0302 or 0303 shall be regarded as originating in Kenya in accordance with the terms set out in Articles 2 to 5 of this Decision.’;
Z odstopanjem od Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 in v skladu s členom 36(1)(a) navedene priloge se fileti tuna z oznako KN 16041416, proizvedeni iz tuna brez porekla iz tarifne številke HS 0302 ali 0303, štejejo za proizvod s poreklom iz Kenije v skladu s pogoji iz členov 2 do 5 tega sklepa.“;
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to the products and the quantities set out in the Annex which are declared for release for free circulation in the Union from Kenya during the period from 1 January 2012 until 31 December 2013.’;
Odstopanje iz člena 1 se uporablja za proizvode in količine iz Kenije, navedene v Prilogi, ki so prijavljeni za sprostitev v prosti promet v Uniji med 1. januarjem 2012 in 31. decembrom 2013.“;
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2012 until 31 December 2013.’;
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. januarja 2012 do 31. decembra 2013.“;
The Annex is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k temu sklepu.
Done at Brussels, 20 April 2012.
V Bruslju, 20. aprila 2012
OJ L 338, 21.12.2011, p. 61.
UL L 338, 21.12.2011, str. 61.
Implementing Decision 2011/861/EU applied until 31 December 2011.
Izvedbeni sklep 2011/861/EU se je uporabljal do 31. decembra 2011.
It is necessary to ensure continuity of importations from the ACP countries to the Union as well as a smooth transition to the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement between the East African Community on the one part and the European Community and its Member States on the other part (‘EAC-EU Interim Economic Partnership Agreement’).
Treba je zagotoviti nadaljevanje uvoza iz držav AKP v Unijo kot tudi nemoten prehod k Začasnemu sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Vzhodnoafriško skupnostjo na drugi („Začasni sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu EAC-EU“).
concerning the application of the control and movement provisions of Council Directive 2008/118/EC to certain additives, in accordance with Article 20(2) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC
o uporabi določb o nadzoru in gibanju Direktive Sveta 2008/118/ES za nekatere dodatke v skladu s členom 20(2) Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES
Following a request made by the Authorities of the Netherlands under Article 20(2) of Directive 2003/96/EC, the Commission has adopted Commission Implementing Decision 2011/545/EU of 16 September 2011 concerning the application of the control and movement provisions of Council Directive 2008/118/EC to products falling within CN code 3811, in accordance with Article 20(2) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC [2].
Na podlagi zahtevka, ki so ga vložili nizozemski organi v skladu s členom 20(2) Direktive 2003/96/ES, je Komisija sprejela Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2011/545/EU z dne 16. septembra 2011 o uporabi določb o nadzoru in gibanju Direktive Sveta 2008/118/ES za proizvode pod oznako KN 3811 v skladu s členom 20(2) Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES [2].
That Implementing Decision submits all products falling within CN code 3811 to the control and movement provisions of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC [3].
V skladu z navedenim izvedbenim sklepom veljajo za vse proizvode pod oznako KN 3811 določbe o nadzoru in gibanju Direktive Sveta 2008/118/ES z dne 16. decembra 2008 o splošnem režimu za trošarino in o razveljavitvi Direktive 92/12/EGS [3].
In line with the request made by the Authorities of the Netherlands, the intention of Implementing Decision 2011/545/EU is to prevent tax evasion, avoidance and abuse, by submitting to the control and movement provisions of Directive 2008/118/EC certain products intended to be used as additives for motor fuels and which, in this case, are subject to taxation in accordance with Directive 2003/96/EC.
V skladu z zahtevkom, ki so ga vložile nizozemske oblasti, je namen Izvedbenega sklepa 2011/545/EU preprečiti davčno utajo, izogibanje in zlorabo tako, da se za določene proizvode, ki bodo uporabljeni kot dodatki za pogonsko gorivo in so v tem primeru obdavčeni v skladu z Direktivo 2003/96/ES, izvajajo določbe o nadzoru in gibanju Direktive 2008/118/ES.
Following the adoption of Implementing Decision 2011/545/EU, the Commission’s attention has been drawn to the particular position of products falling within CN codes 38112100 and 38112900.
Po sprejetju Izvedbenega sklepa 2011/545/EU je Komisija namenjala pozornost posebnemu položaju proizvodov pod oznakama KN 38112100 in 38112900.
Those products are neither intended to be used as heating fuels or motor fuels, nor as additives thereto and do not give rise to a risk of tax evasion, avoidance or abuse.
Ti proizvodi niso namenjeni niti za uporabo kot goriva za ogrevanje ali pogonska goriva niti kot dodatki za ta goriva in ne povzročajo tveganja davčne utaje, izogibanja ali zlorabe.
They should thus not be made subject to the control and movement provisions of Directive 2008/118/EC.
Zato za njih ne bi smele veljati določbe o nadzoru in gibanju Direktive 2008/118/ES.
Only products falling within CN codes 38111110, 38111190, 38111900 and 38119000 should thus be made subject to those control and movement provisions.
Iz tega razloga veljajo navedene določbe o nadzoru in gibanju samo za proizvode pod oznakami KN 38111110, 38111190, 38111900 in 38119000.
Implementing Decision 2011/545/EU should therefore be replaced by an analogous Decision, which should however be limited to CN codes 38111110, 38111190, 38111900 and 38119000.
Izvedbeni sklep 2011/545/EU je zato treba nadomestiti s podobnim sklepom, ki pa mora biti omejen na oznake KN 38111110, 38111190, 38111900 in 38119000.
As from 1 January 2013, products falling within CN codes 38111110, 38111190, 38111900 and 38119000 of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 [4] as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 [5] shall be subject to the control and movement provisions of Directive 2008/118/EC, in accordance with Article 20(2) of Directive 2003/96/EC.Article 2
Od 1. januarja 2013 dalje za proizvode pod oznakami KN 38111110, 38111190, 38111900 in 38119000 Priloge I k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 [4], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2031/2001 [5], v skladu s členom 20(2) Direktive 2003/96/ES veljajo določbe o nadzoru in gibanju Direktive 2008/118/ES.Člen 2
Implementing Decision 2011/545/EU is repealed.
Izvedbeni sklep 2011/545/EU se razveljavi.
OJ L 241, 17.9.2011, p. 33.
UL L 241, 17.9.2011, str. 33.
on recognition of the ‘Ensus voluntary scheme under RED for Ensus bioethanol production’ for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 2009/28/EC and 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o potrditvi „prostovoljnega sistema Ensus v skladu z RED za Ensusovo proizvodnjo bioetanola“ za dokazljivo skladnost s trajnostnimi merili iz Direktiv 2009/28/ES in 98/70/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels [2], as amended by Directive 2009/30/EC [3], and in particular Article 7c(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 98/70/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. oktobra 1998 o kakovosti motornega bencina in dizelskega goriva [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/30/ES [3], in zlasti člena 7c(6) Direktive,
When reference is made to the provisions of Articles 17, 18 and Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC this should be construed as the reference also to the similar provisions of Articles 7b, 7c and Annex IV to Directive 98/70/EC.
Sklicevanje na določbe členov 17 in 18 ter Priloge V k Direktivi 2009/28/ES si je treba razlagati tudi kot sklicevanje na podobne določbe členov 7b, 7c in Priloge IV k Direktivi 98/70/ES.
Where biofuels and bioliquids are to be taken into account for the purposes referred to in Article 17(1), points (a), (b) and (c), Member States shall require economic operators to show the compliance of biofuels and bioliquids with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(2) to (5) by Directive 2009/28/EC.
Kadar se pogonska biogoriva in drugih tekoča biogoriva upoštevajo za namene iz člena 17(1)(a), (b) in (c), države članice od gospodarskih subjektov zahtevajo, da dokažejo skladnost pogonskih biogoriv in drugih tekočih biogoriv s trajnostnimi merili iz člena 17(2) do (5) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
Recital 76 of Directive 2009/28/EC states that the imposition of an unreasonable burden on industry should be avoided and voluntary schemes can help create efficient solutions for proving compliance with these sustainability criteria.
Uvodna izjava 76 Direktive 2009/28/ES navaja, da se je treba izogniti nerazumnim obremenitvam industrije in da lahko prostovoljni sistemi pomagajo oblikovati učinkovite rešitve za zagotavljanje skladnosti z navedenimi trajnostnimi merili.
The Commission may decide that a voluntary national or international scheme demonstrates that consignments of biofuel comply with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 17(3) to (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC or that a voluntary national or international scheme to measure greenhouse gas emission savings contains accurate data for the purposes of Article 17(2) of this Directive.
Komisija lahko odloči, da nacionalni ali mednarodni sistem dokazuje, da so pošiljke biogoriv skladne s trajnostnimi merili iz člena 17(3) do (5) Direktive 2009/28/ES ali da prostovoljni nacionalni ali mednarodni sistem za merjenje prihrankov emisij toplogrednih plinov vsebuje točne podatke za namene člena 17(2) navedene direktive.
When an economic operator provides proof or data obtained in accordance with a scheme that has been recognised by the Commission, to the extent covered by that recognition decision, a Member State shall not require the supplier to provide further evidence of compliance with the sustainability criteria.
Če gospodarski subjekt predloži dokaz ali podatke, pridobljene v skladu s sistemom, ki ga je priznala Komisija, v okviru navedenega sklepa o priznanju, država članica od dobavitelja ne zahteva dodatnih dokazil o skladnosti s trajnostnimi merili.
The ‘Ensus voluntary scheme under RED for Ensus bioethanol production’ (hereafter ‘Ensus scheme’) was submitted on 21 November 2011 to the Commission with the request for recognition.
„Prostovoljni sistem Ensus v skladu z RED za Ensusovo proizvodnjo bioetanola“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistem Ensus) je bil skupaj s prošnjo za priznanje Komisiji predložen 21. novembra 2011.
This scheme covers bioethanol from EU feed wheat produced by the Ensus One plant.
Ta sistem zajema bioetanol iz krmne pšenice, pridelane v EU, proizveden v objektu Ensus One.
The Commission will take into account considerations of commercial sensitivity and may decide to only partially publish the scheme.
Komisija se bo ob upoštevanju preudarkov o poslovni občutljivosti lahko odločila za le delno objavo sistema.
Assessment of the Ensus scheme found it to adequately cover the sustainability criteria of Directive 2009/28/EC, as well as applying a mass balance methodology in line with the requirements of Article 18(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Ocena sistema Ensus je pokazala, da zadostno upošteva trajnostna merila iz Direktive 2009/28/ES ter da v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 18(1) Direktive 2009/28/ES uporablja metodo masne bilance.
The evaluation of the Ensus scheme found that it meets adequate standards of reliability, transparency and independent auditing and also complies with the methodological requirements in Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC,
Ocena sistema Ensus je pokazala, da dosega ustrezne standarde zanesljivosti, preglednosti in neodvisne revizije ter izpolnjuje metodološke zahteve iz Priloge V k Direktivi 2009/28/ES –
The voluntary scheme ‘Ensus voluntary scheme under RED for Ensus bioethanol production’ for which the request for recognition was submitted to the Commission on 21 November 2011 demonstrates that consignments of biofuels comply with the sustainability criteria as laid down in Article 17(3), 17(4) and 17(5) of Directive 2009/28/EC and Article 7b(3), 7b(4) and 7b(5) of Directive 98/70/EC.
„Prostovoljni sistem Ensus v skladu z RED za Ensusovo proizvodnjo bioetanola“, za katerega je bila prošnja za priznanje Komisiji predložena 21. novembra 2011, dokazuje, da so pošiljke biogoriv skladne s trajnostnimi merili iz členov 17(3), 17(4) in 17(5) Direktive 2009/28/ES ter členov 7b(3), 7b(4) in 7b(5) Direktive 98/70/ES.
If the scheme, after adoption of the Commission decision, undergoes changes to its contents in a way that might affect the basis of this Decision, such changes shall be notified to the Commission without delay.
Če se po sprejetju sklepa Komisije sistem vsebinsko spremeni na način, ki bi lahko vplival na podlago tega sklepa, je treba o spremembah nemudoma obvestiti Komisijo.
If it has been clearly demonstrated that the scheme has not implemented elements considered to be decisive for this Decision and if a severe and structural breach of those elements has taken place, the Commission may revoke its Decision.
Če se jasno dokaže, da sistem ne izvaja elementov, ki veljajo za odločilne za ta sklep, ali v primeru resnih strukturnih vrzeli glede navedenih elementov, Komisija lahko sklep prekliče.
Done at Brussels, 23 April 2012.
V Bruslju, 23. aprila 2012
amending Decision 2011/734/EU addressed to Greece with a view to reinforcing and deepening fiscal surveillance and giving notice to Greece to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary to remedy the situation of excessive deficit
o spremembi Sklepa 2011/734/EU, naslovljenega na Grčijo za okrepitev in poglobitev fiskalnega nadzora ter poziv Grčiji, da sprejme ukrepe za zmanjšanje primanjkljaja, ki so potrebni za odpravo čezmernega primanjkljaja
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 126(9) and Article 136 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in zlasti člena 126(9) in člena 136 Pogodbe,
Article 136(1)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) foresees the possibility of adopting measures specific to the Member States whose currency is the euro with a view to strengthening the coordination and surveillance of their budgetary discipline.
Člen 136(1)(a) PDEU določa možnost, da se za tiste države članice, katerih valuta je euro, sprejmejo ukrepi za večjo uskladitev in nadzorovanje njihove proračunske discipline.
Article 126 TFEU establishes that Member States are to avoid excessive government deficits and sets out the excessive deficit procedure to that effect.
Člen 126 PDEU določa, da se države članice izogibajo čezmernemu javnofinančnemu primanjkljaju, in v ta namen določa postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem.
On 27 April 2009, the Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), that an excessive deficit existed in Greece.
Svet je 27. aprila 2009 v skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (PES) odločil, da ima Grčija čezmeren primanjkljaj.
Decision 2010/320/EU was substantially amended several times.
Sklep 2010/320/EU je bil večkrat bistveno spremenjen.
Since further amendments were to be made, it was recast, on 12 July 2011, by Decision 2011/734/EU [2] in the interests of clarity.
Ker so potrebne dodatne spremembe, je bil zaradi jasnosti 12. julija 2011 prenovljen s Sklepom Sveta 2011/734/EU [2].
Economic activity in 2011-2014 is currently estimated and projected to be much weaker than had been expected when Decisions 2010/320/EU and 2011/734/EU were adopted.
Trenutno se ocenjuje, da bo pričakovana gospodarska dejavnost v letih 2011–2014 veliko šibkejša od pričakovanj v preteklosti, ko sta bila sprejeta sklepa 2010/320/EU in 2011/734/EU.
Economic activity is estimated to have contracted in 2011 by 6,9 %.
Po ocenah naj bi se gospodarska dejavnost v letu 2011 zmanjšala za 6,9 %.
In February 2012, the Greek government announced measures aimed at reducing the primary deficit in 2012, including the adoption of a supplementary budget.
(7) Februarja 2012 je grška vlada napovedala ukrepe, katerih cilj je zmanjšanje primarnega primanjkljaja v letu 2012, vključno s sprejetjem dodatnega proračuna.
In March 2012, Greece launched and executed a debt exchange operation which substantially reduces the debt level and interest expenditure in 2012 and in the next years, and contributes to the sustainability of government debt.
(8) Marca 2012 je Grčija začela in izvedla posle izmenjave dolga, s katerimi se bodo znatno zmanjšali stopnja dolga in odhodki od obresti v letu 2012 in v prihodnjih letih ter bodo prispevali k vzdržnosti javnega dolga.
In the light of the above considerations, it appears appropriate to amend Decision 2011/734/EU in a number of respects, including the fiscal adjustment path, while keeping unchanged the deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit,
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se zdi primerno spremeniti številne vidike Sklepa 2011/734/EU, vključno s proračunsko prilagoditvijo, pri tem pa ohraniti rok za odpravo čezmernega primanjkljaja –
Decision 2011/734/EU is hereby amended as follows:
Sklep 2011/734/EU se spremeni:
The adjustment path referred to in paragraph 2 is consistent with an annual change in the general government consolidated debt of EUR - 26954 million in 2012, of EUR 6775 million in 2013 and of EUR 1492 million in 2014.’;
Prilagoditvena pot iz odstavka 2 je skladna z letno spremembo konsolidiranega bruto državnega dolga v višini – 26954 milijonov EUR v letu 2012, 6775 milijonov EUR v letu 2013 in 1492 milijonov EUR v leta 2014.“;
in Article 2, the following paragraph is inserted:
v členu 2 se vstavi naslednji odstavek:
Greece shall adopt the following measures without delay:
Grčija brez odlašanja sprejme naslednje ukrepe:
a reduction in pharmaceutical expenditure by at least EUR 1076 million in 2012;
zmanjšanje odhodkov za farmacevtske izdelke za najmanj 1076 milijonov EUR v letu 2012;
a reduction in overtime pay for doctors in hospitals by at least EUR 50 million in 2012;
zmanjšanje plačila nadurnega dela zdravnikov v bolnišnicah za najmanj 50 milijonov EUR v letu 2012;
a reduction in the procurement of military material by EUR 300 million (cash and deliveries) in 2012;
zmanjšanje javnih naročil vojaškega materiala za 300 milijonov EUR (gotovina in dobave) v letu 2012;
a reduction by 10 % in the remuneration of elected and related staff at local level in 2012 and a reduction in the number of deputy mayors and associated staff in 2013 with the aim of saving at least EUR 9 million in 2012 and an additional EUR 28 million in 2013;
10 % zmanjšanje plačil za izvoljeno in spremljevalno osebje na lokalni ravni v letu 2012 in zmanjšanje števila podžupanov ter z njimi povezanega osebja v letu 2013, da se prihrani vsaj 9 milijonov EUR v letu 2012 in dodatnih 28 milijonov EUR leta 2013;