natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Credit institutions and investment firms are already subject to the principle that awards and discretionary payments of variable remuneration to those categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the institution have to be sustainable, having regard to the financial situation of the institution.
Za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja že velja načelo, da morajo biti nagrade in diskrecijska izplačila variabilnih prejemkov vzdržni za tiste kategorije zaposlenih, katerih poklicne dejavnosti pomembno vplivajo na profil tveganosti institucije, pri čemer se upošteva finančni položaj institucije.
In order to ensure that an institution restores its levels of own funds in a timely manner, it is appropriate to align the award of variable remuneration and discretionary pension benefits with the profit situation of the institution during any period in which the combined buffer requirement is not met, taking into account the long-term health of the institution.
Za zagotovitev, da institucija pravočasno ponovno vzpostavi ravni kapitala, je ob upoštevanju dolgoročnega zdravja institucije potrebno ustrezno uskladiti izplačilo variabilnih prejemkov in diskrecijskih pokojninskih ugodnosti z dobičkom institucije v vsakem obdobju, v katerem zahteva po skupnem blažilniku ni izpolnjena.
Institutions should address and control all concentration risks by means of written policies and procedures.
Institucije bi morale s pisnimi politikami in postopki odpravljati in nadzorovati vsa tveganja koncentracije.
Given the nature of public sector exposures, controlling concentration risks is more effective than risk weighting those exposures, given their size and the difficulties in calibrating own funds requirements.
Zaradi narave izpostavljenosti javnega sektorja ter zaradi obsega teh izpostavljenosti in težav pri umerjanju kapitalskih zahtev je nadzorovanje tveganj koncentracije učinkovitejše od tehtanja tveganja teh izpostavljenosti.
The Commission should, at an appropriate time, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council about any desirable changes to the prudential treatment of concentration risk.
Komisija bi morala v ustreznem trenutku Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti poročilo o morebitnih smiselnih spremembah bonitetne obravnave tveganja koncentracije.
Member States should be able to require certain institutions to hold, in addition to a capital conservation buffer and a countercyclical capital buffer, a systemic risk buffer in order to prevent and mitigate long-term non-cyclical systemic or macroprudential risks not covered by Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, where there is a risk of disruption in the financial system with the potential to have serious negative consequences for the financial system and the real economy in a specific Member State.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da od nekaterih institucij zahtevajo, da imajo poleg varovalnega kapitalskega blažilnika in proticikličnega kapitalskega blažilnika tudi blažilnik sistemskih tveganj, da bi tako preprečile in zmanjšale dolgoročna neciklična sistemska ali makrobonitetna tveganja, ki jih Uredba (EU) št. 575/2013 ne zajema, če obstaja tveganje motenj v finančnem sistemu, ki bi utegnile imeti resne negativne posledice za finančni sistem in realno gospodarstvo v posamezni državi članici.
The systemic risk buffer rate should apply to all institutions, or to one or more subsets of those institutions, where the institutions exhibit similar risk profiles in their business activities.
Stopnja blažilnika sistemskih tveganj bi se morala uporabljati za vse institucije ali za eno ali več podskupin teh institucij, kjer institucije opravljajo poslovne dejavnosti s podobnimi profili tveganosti.
In order to ensure consistent macroprudential oversight across the Union, it is appropriate that the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) develop principles tailored to the Union economy and be responsible for monitoring their application.
Za doseganje skladnega makrobonitetnega nadzora po vsej Uniji je ustrezno, da Evropski odbor za sistemska tveganja (ESRB) oblikuje načela, prilagojena gospodarstvu Unije, ter je odgovoren za spremljanje njihove uporabe.
This Directive should not prevent the ESRB from taking any actions that it considers necessary under Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union macroprudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board [10].
Ta direktiva ESRB ne bi smela preprečiti ukrepanja, za katerega meni, da je potrebno v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1092/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o makrobonitetnem nadzoru nad finančnim sistemom Evropske unije in ustanovitvi Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja [10].
Member States should be able to recognise the systemic risk buffer rate set by another Member State and apply that buffer rate to domestically authorised institutions for the exposures located in the Member State setting the buffer rate.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da priznajo stopnjo blažilnika sistemskih tveganj, ki jo določi druga država članica, in to stopnjo blažilnika uporabljajo za institucije, ki so pridobile dovoljenje v matični državi članici za izpostavljenosti v državi članici, ki določi stopnjo blažilnika.
The Member State setting the buffer rate should also be able to ask the ESRB to issue a recommendation as referred to in Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010, addressed to one or more Member States which are in a position to recognise the systemic risk buffer rate recommending that they do so.
Država članica, ki določi stopnjo blažilnika, bi morala imeti možnost ESR) zaprositi tudi, naj izda priporočilo iz člena 16 Uredbe (EU) št. 1092/2010, naslovljeno na eno ali več držav članic, ki bi lahko priznale stopnjo blažilnika, in jim priporoči, naj to storijo.
Such a recommendation is subject to the "comply or explain" rule set out in Article 3(2) and Article 17 of that Regulation.
To priporočilo je odvisno od pravila "upoštevaj ali pojasni" iz člena 3(2) in člena 17 navedene uredbe.
It is appropriate that decisions of Member States on countercyclical buffer rates are coordinated as far as possible.
Primerno je, da so odločitve držav članic glede stopenj proticikličnih blažilnikov čim bolj usklajene.
In that regard, the ESRB, if requested to do so by competent or designated authorities, could facilitate discussions between those authorities about setting proposed buffer rates, including relevant variables.
Na zahtevo pristojnih ali imenovanih organov bi lahko ESRB v zvezi z navedenim pomagal pri medsebojnih razpravah med temi organi o določitvi predlaganih stopenj blažilnikov, vključno z ustreznimi spremenljivkami.
Where a credit institution or investment firm fails to meet in full the combined buffer requirement, it should be subject to measures designed to ensure that it restores its levels of own funds in a timely manner.
Kadar kreditna institucija ali investicijsko podjetje ne izpolnjuje v celoti zahtev po skupnem blažilniku, bi bilo treba z ustreznimi ukrepi zagotoviti, da pravočasno ponovno vzpostavi njeno raven kapitala.
In order to conserve capital, it is appropriate to impose proportionate restrictions on discretionary distributions of profits, including dividend payments and payments of variable remuneration.
Za ohranitev kapitala je primerno, da se uvedejo sorazmerne omejitve glede diskrecijskih razdelitev dobička, vključno z izplačili dividend in plačili variabilnih prejemkov.
So as to ensure that such institutions or firms have a credible strategy to restore levels of own funds, they should be required to draw up and agree with the competent authorities a capital conservation plan that sets out how the restrictions on distributions will be applied and other measures that the institution or firm intends to take to ensure compliance with the full buffer requirements.
Da se zagotovi, da imajo takšne institucije ali podjetja verodostojno strategijo za ponovno vzpostavitev ravni kapitala, bi bilo treba od njih zahtevati, naj pripravijo načrt za ohranitev ravni kapitala, s katerim se strinjajo pristojni organi in ki določa omejitve razdelitve ter druge ukrepe, ki jih namerava institucija ali podjetje sprejeti za zagotovitev skladnosti z vsemi zahtevami po blažilniku.
Authorities are expected to impose higher own funds requirements on global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) in order to compensate for the higher risk that G-SIIs represent for the financial system and the potential impact of their failure on taxpayers.
Organi bodo globalnim sistemsko pomembnim institucijam (GSPI) verjetno naložili strožje kapitalske zahteve, da bi tako uravnotežili večje tveganje, ki ga GSPI predstavljajo za finančni sistem, in morebitni učinek njihovega propada na davkoplačevalce.
Where an authority imposes the systemic risk buffer and the G-SII buffer is applicable, the higher of the two should apply.
Kadar organ naloži uporabo blažilnika sistemskih tveganj in se uporablja t blažilnik za GSPI, bi se moral uporabiti blažilnik, ki ima višjo stopnjo.
Where the systemic risk buffer only applies to domestic exposures, it should be cumulative with the G-SII buffer or the buffer relating to other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) which is applied in accordance with this Directive.
Kadar se blažilnik sistemskih tveganj uporablja le za izpostavljenosti v državi članici, bi se moral prišteti k blažilniku GSPI ali k blažilniku za druge sistemsko pomembne institucije (DSPI), ki se uporablja v skladu s to direktivo.
Technical standards in financial services should ensure consistent harmonisation and adequate protection of depositors, investors and consumers across the Union.
S tehničnimi standardi v finančnih storitvah bi bilo treba zagotoviti dosledno harmoniziranost in ustrezno zaščito vlagateljev, investitorjev in potrošnikov po vsej Uniji.
As a body with highly specialised expertise, it would be efficient and appropriate to entrust EBA with the elaboration of draft regulatory and implementing technical standards which do not involve policy choices, for submission to the Commission.
Ker je EBA organ z visoko specializiranimi strokovnjaki, bi bilo učinkovito in ustrezno, da se mu zaupa priprava osnutkov regulativnih in izvedbenih tehničnih standardov, ki ne vključujejo odločitev politik, ti osnutki pa se predložijo Komisiji.
EBA should ensure efficient administrative and reporting processes when drafting technical standards.
EBA bi moral pri pripravi tehničnih standardov zagotoviti učinkovite upravne in poročevalske postopke.
Given the detail and number of regulatory technical standards that are to be adopted pursuant to this Directive, where the Commission adopts a regulatory technical standard which is the same as the draft regulatory technical standard submitted by EBA, the period within which the European Parliament or the Council may object to a regulatory technical standard should, where appropriate, be further extended by one month.
Glede na podrobnosti in število regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki se jih bo sprejelo v skladu s to direktivo, bi se moralo v primeru, da Komisija sprejme regulativni tehnični standard, ki je enak osnutku regulativnega tehničnega standarda, ki ga je predložil EBA, obdobje, v katerem lahko Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotujeta regulativnemu tehničnemu standardu podaljšati za en mesec.
Moreover, the Commission should aim to adopt the regulatory technical standards in good time to permit the European Parliament and the Council to exercise full scrutiny, taking account of the volume and complexity of regulatory technical standards and the details of the European Parliament's and the Council's rules of procedure, calendar of work and composition.
Komisija bi si morala prizadevati za pravočasno sprejetje regulativnih tehničnih standardov, da bi Evropski parlament in Svet lahko izkoristila celotno obdobje pregleda, saj je treba upoštevati obseg in zapletenost regulativnih tehničnih standardov ter podrobnosti poslovnikov Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, delovni koledar in sestavo.
The Commission should also be empowered to adopt implementing technical standards developed by EBA in the areas of authorisation of and acquisitions of significant holdings in credit institutions, information exchange between competent authorities, supervisory collaboration, specific prudential requirements and disclosure of information by supervisory authorities by means of implementing acts pursuant to Article 291 TFEU and in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Komisija bi morala biti pooblaščena tudi za sprejetje izvedbenih tehničnih standardov, ki jih razvije EBA na področju dovoljenj za poslovanje kreditnih institucij in pridobitve pomembnejših deležev v njih, izmenjave informacij med pristojnimi organi, nadzorniškega sodelovanja, posebnih bonitetnih zahtev in razkritja informacij s strani nadzornih organov z uporabo izvedbenih aktov v skladu s členom 291 PDEU in členom 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers [11].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije [11].
In order to specify the requirements set out in this Directive, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of clarifying the definitions and the terminology used in this Directive, expanding the list of activities subject to mutual recognition and improving the exchange of information concerning branches of credit institutions.
Da bi se zahteve iz te direktive natančneje določile, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastila, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi s pojasnitvijo opredelitev pojmov in terminologije iz te direktive, razširitvijo seznama dejavnosti, za katere velja medsebojno priznavanje, in boljšo izmenjavo informacij glede podružnic kreditnih institucij.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
Zlasti je pomembno, da se Komisija pri svojem pripravljalnem delu opravi ustrezna posvetovanja, vključno na ravni strokovnjakov.
References to Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC should be construed as references to this Directive and to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Sklicevanja na direktivi 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES bi se morala brati kot sklicevanja na to direktivo in Uredbo(EU) št. 575/2013.
Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate [12], Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market [13], Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) [14], Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions [15] and Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers [16] refer to provisions of Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC concerning own funds requirements which should be set out in this Directive and in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Direktiva 2002/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2002 o dopolnilnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij, zavarovalnic in investicijskih družb v finančnem konglomeratu [12], Direktiva 2007/64/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. novembra 2007 o plačilnih storitvah na notranjem trgu [13], Direktiva 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP) [14], Direktiva 2009/110/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti ter nadzoru skrbnega in varnega poslovanja institucij za izdajo elektronskega denarja [15], ter Direktiva 2011/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2011 o upraviteljih alternativnih investicijskih skladov [16] se sklicujejo na določbe direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES v zvezi s kapitalskimi zahtevami, ki bi se morale določiti v tej direktivi in Uredbi (EU) št. 575/2013.
Consequently, references in those Directives to Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC should be construed as references to the provisions governing own funds requirements in this Directive and in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Zato bi se morala sklicevanja na direktivi 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES v navedenih direktivah brati kot sklicevanja na določbe, ki urejajo kapitalske zahteve v tej direktivi in Uredbi (EU) št. 575/2013.
In order to allow for technical standards to be developed so that institutions that are part of a financial conglomerate apply the appropriate calculation methods for the determination of required capital on a consolidated basis, Directive 2002/87/EC should be amended accordingly.
Da se omogoči oblikovanje tehničnih standardov, s katerimi institucije, ki so del finančnega konglomerata, uporabljajo ustrezne metode izračuna za določitev zahtevanega kapitala na konsolidirani podlagi, bi bilo treba Direktivo 2002/87/ES ustrezno spremeniti.
In order for the internal banking market to operate with increasing effectiveness and for citizens of the Union to be afforded adequate levels of transparency, it is necessary that competent authorities publish, in a manner which allows for meaningful comparison, information on the manner in which this Directive is implemented.
Da bi notranji bančni trg deloval vedno bolj učinkovito in da se državljanom Unije zagotovi ustrezna stopnja preglednosti, je potrebno, da pristojni organi objavijo informacije o načinu izvajanja te direktive, tako da je mogoča smiselna primerjava.
With respect to the supervision of liquidity, there should be a period of time within which Member States effect transition towards the regulatory regime under which detailed criteria for the liquidity coverage requirement apply.
Glede nadzora likvidnosti bi moralo biti na voljo obdobje, v katerem države članice preidejo na regulativni režim, v skladu s katerim se uporabljajo podrobna merila za zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja.
In order to ensure a stable, smooth and progressive transition by institutions to new liquidity and stable funding requirements at Union level, competent authorities should make full use of their supervisory powers under this Directive and under any applicable national law.
Da bi zagotovili stabilen, gladek in postopen prehod institucij na nove zahteve glede likvidnosti in stabilnih virov financiranja na ravni Unije, bi morali pristojni organi v celoti uporabiti svoja nadzorna pooblastila na podlagi te direktive in na podlagi veljavnega nacionalnega prava.
In particular, competent authorities should assess whether there is a need to apply administrative penalties or other administrative measures, including prudential charges, the level of which should broadly relate to the disparity between the actual liquidity position of an institution and the liquidity and stable funding requirements.
Pristojni organi bi morali zlasti razmisliti o potrebi po uporabi upravnih kazni ali drugih upravnih ukrepov, vključno z dodatnimi bonitetnimi ukrepi, njihova raven pa bi morala biti na splošno povezana z neskladjem med dejanskim likvidnostnim položajem institucije ter zahtevami glede likvidnosti in stabilnih virov financiranja.
In making this assessment, competent authorities should have due regard to market conditions.
Pristojni organi bi morali pri pripravi te ocene ustrezno upoštevati tržne pogoje.
Such administrative penalties or other administrative measures should apply until detailed legal acts on liquidity and stable funding requirements are implemented at Union level.
Takšne upravne kazni ali drugi upravni ukrepi bi se morali uporabljati, dokler na ravni Unije ne bodo uveljavljeni izčrpni pravni akti o zahtevah glede likvidnosti in stabilnih virov financiranja.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [17] and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [18], should be fully applicable to the processing of personal data for the purposes of this Directive.
Pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov za namene te direktive bi se morali v celoti uporabljati Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [17] ter Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [18].
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely the introduction of rules concerning access to the activity of institutions, and the prudential supervision of institutions, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and the effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer določitve pravil o dostopu do dejavnosti institucij ter bonitetnem nadzoru institucij in, države članice same ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč jih je zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa lažje doseči na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents of 28 September 2011, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
V skladu s skupno politično izjavo z dne 28. septembra 2011 držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih se države članice zavezujejo, da bodo v upravičenih primerih obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile en ali več dokumentov, v katerih se pojasni razmerje med sestavnimi elementi direktive in ustrezajočimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
The European Data Protection Supervisor has been consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and has adopted an opinion [19].
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov s skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št 45/2001, ki je sprejel mennje [19].
Directive 2002/87/EC should be amended accordingly and Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC should be repealed,
Direktivo 2002/87/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti in direktivi 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES razveljaviti –
SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
PREDMET UREJANJA, PODROČJE UPORABE TER OPREDELITEV POJMOV
This Directive lays down rules concerning:
Ta direktiva določa pravila o: