natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to allow citizens to avail themselves, with all legal certainty, of the benefits offered by the internal market, this Regulation should enable them to know in advance which law will apply to their succession.
Da bi državljani ob upoštevanju načela pravne varnosti lahko uživali ugodnosti, ki jih ponuja notranji trg, bi jim moralo biti na podlagi te uredbe vnaprej jasno, katero pravo se bo uporabljalo za dedovanje po njih.
Harmonised conflict-of-laws rules should be introduced in order to avoid contradictory results.
Uvesti bi bilo treba harmonizirana kolizijska pravila, da bi se preprečilo nasprotujoče si izide.
The main rule should ensure that the succession is governed by a predictable law with which it is closely connected.
Glavno pravilo bi moralo zagotoviti, da je dedovanje urejeno s predvidljivim pravom, s katerim je tesno povezano.
For reasons of legal certainty and in order to avoid the fragmentation of the succession, that law should govern the succession as a whole, that is to say, all of the property forming part of the estate, irrespective of the nature of the assets and regardless of whether the assets are located in another Member State or in a third State.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in da bi preprečili razdrobljenost zapuščine, bi moralo to pravo urejati celotno dedovanje, torej vse premoženje, ki sestavlja zapuščino, ne glede na to, za kakšno premoženje gre, in ne glede na to, ali se premoženje nahaja v drugi državi članici ali v tretji državi.
This Regulation should enable citizens to organise their succession in advance by choosing the law applicable to their succession.
Ta uredba bi morala državljanom omogočati, da vnaprej uredijo dedovanje z izbiro prava, ki se bo uporabljalo za dedovanje po njih.
That choice should be limited to the law of a State of their nationality in order to ensure a connection between the deceased and the law chosen and to avoid a law being chosen with the intention of frustrating the legitimate expectations of persons entitled to a reserved share.
Izbira bi morala biti omejena na pravo države, katere državljani so, da bi zagotovili povezavo med zapustnikom in izbranim pravom ter preprečili, da bi se pravo izbralo, zato da se ne bi uresničila legitimna pričakovanja oseb, ki so upravičene do nujnega deleža.
A choice of law should be made expressly in a declaration in the form of a disposition of property upon death or be demonstrated by the terms of such a disposition.
Izbira prava bi se morala izrecno navesti v izjavi, ki ima obliko razpolaganja za primer smrti ali pa izhajati iz določil takšnega razpolaganja.
A choice of law could be regarded as demonstrated by a disposition of property upon death where, for instance, the deceased had referred in his disposition to specific provisions of the law of the State of his nationality or where he had otherwise mentioned that law.
Lahko bi se štelo, da je izbira prava izražena, če je na primer zapustnik v razpolaganju navedel točno določene določbe iz prava države, katere državljan je, ali je kako drugače omenil to pravo.
A choice of law under this Regulation should be valid even if the chosen law does not provide for a choice of law in matters of succession.
Izbira prava v skladu s to uredbo bi morala biti torej veljavna tudi, če izbrano pravo ne določa izbire prava v dednih zadevah.
It should however be for the chosen law to determine the substantive validity of the act of making the choice, that is to say, whether the person making the choice may be considered to have understood and consented to what he was doing.
Vendar pa bi moralo izbrano pravo določati materialno veljavnost dejanja, s katerim se izbere pravo, tj. ali se za osebo, ki izbira pravo, lahko domneva, da razume, kaj dela, in s tem soglaša.
The same should apply to the act of modifying or revoking a choice of law.
Enako bi moralo veljati za dejanje, s katerim se spremeni ali prekliče izbira prava.
For the purposes of the application of this Regulation, the determination of the nationality or the multiple nationalities of a person should be resolved as a preliminary question.
Za namene uporabe te uredbe bi bilo treba predhodno rešiti vprašanje ugotavljanja državljanstva ali več državljanstev zadevne osebe.
The issue of considering a person as a national of a State falls outside the scope of this Regulation and is subject to national law, including, where applicable, international Conventions, in full observance of the general principles of the European Union.
Vprašanje, ali je oseba državljan določene države, ne spada v področje uporabe te uredbe in se rešuje po nacionalnem pravu, po potrebi pa tudi v skladu z mednarodnimi konvencijami, pri čemer se dosledno spoštujejo splošna načela Evropske unije.
The law determined as the law applicable to the succession should govern the succession from the opening of the succession to the transfer of ownership of the assets forming part of the estate to the beneficiaries as determined by that law.
Pravo, določeno kot pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, bi moralo urejati dedovanje od začetka postopka do prehoda lastništva premoženja, ki sestavlja zapuščino, na upravičence, kot jih določa zakon.
It should include questions relating to the administration of the estate and to liability for the debts under the succession.
Urejati bi moralo tudi vprašanja v zvezi z upravljanjem zapuščine in odgovornostjo za zapustnikove dolgove.
The payment of the debts under the succession may, depending, in particular, on the law applicable to the succession, include the taking into account of a specific ranking of the creditors.
Pri poplačilu zapustnikovih dolgov je morda treba upoštevati vrstni red poplačevanja upnikov, zlasti če to določa pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
The rules of jurisdiction laid down by this Regulation may, in certain cases, lead to a situation where the court having jurisdiction to rule on the succession will not be applying its own law.
V tej uredbi določena pravila o pristojnosti lahko v nekaterih primerih pripeljejo do okoliščin, ko sodišče, pristojno za odločanje o dedovanju, ne bo uporabljajo svojega prava.
When that situation occurs in a Member State whose law provides for the mandatory appointment of an administrator of the estate, this Regulation should allow the courts of that Member State, when seised, to appoint one or more such administrators under their own law.
Če do takega primera pride v državi članici, katere pravo predvideva obvezno imenovanje upravitelja zapuščine, bi morala ta uredba sodiščem te države članice omogočiti, da v skladu s svojim pravom imenujejo enega ali več upraviteljev, ko začnejo postopek.
This should be without prejudice to any choice made by the parties to settle the succession amicably out of court in another Member State where this is possible under the law of that Member State.
To ne bi smelo posegati v morebitno odločitev strank, da dedovanje sporazumno uredijo zunaj sodišča v drugi državi članici, če je to mogoče po pravu tiste države članice.
In order to ensure a smooth coordination between the law applicable to the succession and the law of the Member State of the appointing court, the court should appoint the person(s) who would be entitled to administer the estate under the law applicable to the succession, such as for instance the executor of the will of the deceased or the heirs themselves or, if the law applicable to the succession so requires, a third-party administrator.
Da bi se zagotovilo nemoteno usklajevanje med pravom, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, in pravom države članice sodišča, ki imenuje upravitelje, bi moralo sodišče imenovati osebe, ki bi lahko upravljale zapuščino po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, kot so denimo izvršitelj zapustnikove oporoke ali dediči sami ali, če pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje to zahteva, tretja oseba.
The courts may, however, in specific cases where their law so requires, appoint a third party as administrator even if this is not provided for in the law applicable to the succession.
Sodišče lahko v posameznih primerih, če je to po pravu zahtevano, kot upravitelja imenuje tretjo osebo tudi, če tega pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, tega ne predvideva.
If the deceased had appointed an executor of the will, that person may not be deprived of his powers unless the law applicable to the succession allows for the termination of his mandate.
Če je zapustnik imenoval izvršitelja oporoke, se tej osebi pooblastila ne smejo vzeti, razen če pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, predvideva prenehanje njenega mandata.
The powers exercised by the administrators appointed in the Member State of the court seised should be the powers of administration which they may exercise under the law applicable to the succession.
Pooblastila upraviteljev, ki so bili imenovani v državi članici sodišča, ki je začelo postopek, bi morala biti pooblastila za upravljanje, ki jih lahko izvajajo v skladu pravom, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
Thus, if, for instance, the heir is appointed as administrator he should have the powers to administer the estate which an heir would have under that law.
Če je na primer dedič imenovan za upravitelja, bi moral imeti pooblastila za upravljanje premoženja, ki dediču pripadajo v skladu s tem pravom.
Where the powers of administration which may be exercised under the law applicable to the succession are not sufficient to preserve the assets of the estate or to protect the rights of the creditors or of other persons having guaranteed the debts of the deceased, the administrator(s) appointed in the Member State of the court seised may, on a residual basis, exercise powers of administration to that end provided for by the law of that Member State.
Če pooblastila za upravljanje, ki se izvajajo v skladu s pravom, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ne zadostujejo za ohranitev zapuščine ali zaščito pravic upnikov ali drugih oseb, ki so jamčile za zapustnikove dolgove, lahko upravitelj/-i, imenovan/-i v državi članici sodišča, ki je začelo postopek, kot dodatni ukrep izvaja/-jo pooblastila za upravljanje, ki jih za to področje določa pravo te države članice.
Such residual powers could include, for instance, establishing a list of the assets of the estate and the debts under the succession, informing creditors of the opening of the succession and inviting them to make their claims known, and taking any provisional, including protective, measures intended to preserve the assets of the estate.
Ta dodatna pooblastila lahko vključujejo na primer sestavo seznama premoženja in dolgov, ki so predmet dedovanja, seznanitev upnikov o uvedbi dedovanja in povabilo, naj uveljavljajo svoje zahteve, ter sprejetje začasnih ukrepov, vključno z ukrepi zavarovanja, katerih namen je zaščita zapuščine.
The acts performed by an administrator in exercise of the residual powers should respect the law applicable to the succession as regards the transfer of ownership of succession property, including any transaction entered into by the beneficiaries prior to the appointment of the administrator, liability for the debts under the succession and the rights of the beneficiaries, including, where applicable, the right to accept or to waive the succession.
Dejanja upravitelja pri izvajanju dodatnih pooblastil bi morala biti v skladu z določbami prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, o prehodu lastništva zapuščine, vključno z vsemi pravnimi posli, ki so jih sklenili upravičenci pred imenovanjem upravitelja, odgovornostjo za zapustnikove dolgove in pravicami upravičencev, tudi z morebitno pravico za sprejem ali odpoved dediščine.
Such acts could, for instance, only entail the alienation of assets or the payment of debts where this would be allowed under the law applicable to the succession.
Taka dejanja bi lahko denimo pomenila odtujitev premoženja ali plačilo dolgov, če je to dovoljeno po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
Where under the law applicable to the succession the appointment of a third-party administrator changes the liability of the heirs, such a change of liability should be respected.
Če po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, imenovanje upravitelja, ki je tretja oseba, spremeni odgovornost dedičev, bi bilo treba takšno spremembo spoštovati.
This Regulation should not preclude creditors, for instance through a representative, from taking such further steps as may be available under national law, where applicable, in accordance with the relevant Union instruments, in order to safeguard their rights.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v dejstvo, da lahko dediči po potrebi in tudi s pomočjo pooblaščenca za zaščito svojih pravic sprejmejo nadaljnje ukrepe, ki so na voljo po nacionalnem pravu, v skladu z ustreznimi instrumenti Unije.
This Regulation should allow for potential creditors in other Member States where assets are located to be informed of the opening of the succession.
Ta uredba bi morala omogočiti, da se o uvedbi dedovanja obvestijo morebitni upniki v drugih državah članicah, v katerih se nahaja premoženje.
In the context of the application of this Regulation, consideration should therefore be given to the possibility of establishing a mechanism, if appropriate by way of the e-Justice portal, to enable potential creditors in other Member States to access the relevant information so that they can make their claims known.
Glede izvrševanja te uredbe bi bilo treba razmisliti o možnosti vzpostavitve mehanizma, morda s pomočjo portala e-pravosodje, ki bi morebitnim upnikom v drugih državah članicah omogočil dostop do pomembnih podatkov, tako da lahko uveljavijo svoje zahtevke.
The law applicable to the succession should determine who the beneficiaries are in any given succession.
Pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, bi moralo določati upravičence v posamezni dedni zadevi.
Under most laws, the term ‘beneficiaries’ would cover heirs and legatees and persons entitled to a reserved share although, for instance, the legal position of legatees is not the same under all laws.
Izraz bo v večini pravnih sistemov obsegal dediče, volilojemnike in osebe, upravičene do nujnega deleža, čeprav pravni položaj volilojemnikov v vseh pravnih sistemih ni enak.
Under some laws, the legatee may receive a direct share in the estate whereas under other laws the legatee may acquire only a claim against the heirs.
V nekaterih lahko volilojemnik prejme neposredni delež iz zapuščine, v drugih pa ima le pravico zahtevati izpolnitev volila od dedičev.
In order to ensure legal certainty for persons wishing to plan their succession in advance, this Regulation should lay down a specific conflict-of-laws rule concerning the admissibility and substantive validity of dispositions of property upon death.
Da bi zagotovili pravno varnost oseb, ki želijo vnaprej urediti svoje dedovanje, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti posebno kolizijsko pravilo v zvezi z dopustnostjo in materialno veljavnostjo razpolaganja za primer smrti.
To ensure the uniform application of that rule, this Regulation should list which elements should be considered as elements pertaining to substantive validity.
Da bi zagotovili enotno uporabo tega pravila, bi bilo treba v uredbi navesti, kateri elementi naj veljajo za elemente materialne veljavnosti.
The examination of the substantive validity of a disposition of property upon death may lead to the conclusion that that disposition is without legal existence.
Preverjanje materialne veljavnosti razpolaganja za primer smrti bi lahko pokazalo, da je razpolaganje za primer smrti neveljavno.
An agreement as to succession is a type of disposition of property upon death the admissibility and acceptance of which vary among the Member States.
Dedna pogodba je oblika razpolaganja za primer smrti, ki ima v državah članicah različno dopustnost in sprejemljivost.
In order to make it easier for succession rights acquired as a result of an agreement as to succession to be accepted in the Member States, this Regulation should determine which law is to govern the admissibility of such agreements, their substantive validity and their binding effects between the parties, including the conditions for their dissolution.
Da bi se dedne pravice, pridobljene z dedno pogodbo, laže priznale v državah članicah, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti, katero pravo ureja dopustnost takšnih pogodb, njihovo materialno veljavnost in njihove zavezujoče učinke za stranke, vključno s pogoji razveze.
The law which, under this Regulation, will govern the admissibility and substantive validity of a disposition of property upon death and, as regards agreements as to succession, the binding effects of such an agreement as between the parties, should be without prejudice to the rights of any person who, under the law applicable to the succession, has a right to a reserved share or another right of which he cannot be deprived by the person whose estate is involved.
Pravo, ki bo v skladu s to uredbo urejalo dopustnost in materialno veljavnost razpolaganja za primer smrti in v zvezi z dednimi pogodbami zavezujoče učinke takih pogodb za stranke, ne bi smelo posegati v pravice oseb, ki so po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, upravičene do nujnega deleža ali imajo drugo pravico, za katero jih oseba, za katere zapuščino gre, ne more prikrajšati.
Where reference is made in this Regulation to the law which would have been applicable to the succession of the person making a disposition of property upon death if he had died on the day on which the disposition was, as the case may be, made, modified or revoked, such reference should be understood as a reference to either the law of the State of the habitual residence of the person concerned on that day or, if he had made a choice of law under this Regulation, the law of the State of his nationality on that day.
V tej uredbi bi bilo treba napotila na pravo, ki bi se uporabljalo za dedovanje po osebi, ki je razpolagala, če bi umrla na dan, ko je bilo razpolaganje napravljeno oziroma spremenjeno ali preklicano, razumeti kot napotila na pravo države, v kateri je imela zadevna oseba na ta dan običajno prebivališče, ali, če je izbrala pravo v skladu s to uredbo, pravo države, katere državljan je bila na ta dan.
This Regulation should regulate the validity as to form of all dispositions of property upon death made in writing by way of rules which are consistent with those of the Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 on the Conflicts of Laws Relating to the Form of Testamentary Dispositions.
Ta uredba bi morala urejati veljavnost glede oblike vseh pisnih razpolaganj za primer smrti s pravili, ki so v skladu s Haaško konvencijo z dne 5. oktobra 1961 o koliziji zakonov glede oblike oporočnih razpolaganj.
When determining whether a given disposition of property upon death is formally valid under this Regulation, the competent authority should disregard the fraudulent creation of an international element to circumvent the rules on formal validity.
Pri presojanju o tem, ali je določeno razpolaganje za primer smrti formalno veljavno v skladu s to uredbo, pristojni organ ne bi smel upoštevati mednarodnega elementa, ki je bil ustvarjen z goljufivim namenom izogniti se pravilom o formalni veljavnosti.
For the purposes of this Regulation, any provision of law limiting the permitted forms of dispositions of property upon death by reference to certain personal qualifications of the person making the disposition, such as, for instance, his age, should be deemed to pertain to matters of form.
Za namene te uredbe se vsaka pravna določba, ki omejuje dopustne oblike razpolaganj za primer smrti s sklicevanjem na določene osebne okoliščine osebe, ki razpolaga, kot je na primer starost, obravnava kot predmet oblike.
This should not be interpreted as meaning that the law applicable to the formal validity of a disposition of property upon death under this Regulation should determine whether or not a minor has the capacity to make a disposition of property upon death.
Tega se ne bi smelo razlagati tako, da naj bi pravo, ki se uporablja za formalno veljavnost razpolaganja za primer smrti v skladu s to uredbo, določalo, ali mladoletna oseba lahko razpolaga za primer smrti.
That law should only determine whether a personal qualification such as, for instance, minority should bar a person from making a disposition of property upon death in a certain form.
To pravo bi moralo določati le, ali lahko osebna okoliščina, kot je na primer mladoletnost, osebi onemogoča razpolaganje za primer smrti v določeni obliki.
For economic, family or social considerations, certain immovable property, certain enterprises and other special categories of assets are subject to special rules in the Member State in which they are located imposing restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of those assets.
Nekatere nepremičnine, podjetja in druge posebne kategorije premoženja so zaradi gospodarskih, družinskih ali družbenih razlogov predmet posebnih pravil v državi članici, v kateri se nahajajo, ter za njih veljajo določene omejitve, ki zadevajo dedovanje tega premoženja ali nanj vplivajo.
This Regulation should ensure the application of such special rules.
Ta uredba bi morala zagotoviti uporabo teh posebnih pravil.
However, this exception to the application of the law applicable to the succession requires a strict interpretation in order to remain compatible with the general objective of this Regulation.
Vendar je treba to izjemo od uporabe prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, razlagati strogo, da ne bi bila v nasprotju s splošnim ciljem te uredbe.
Therefore, neither conflict-of-laws rules subjecting immovable property to a law different from that applicable to movable property nor provisions providing for a reserved share of the estate greater than that provided for in the law applicable to the succession under this Regulation may be regarded as constituting special rules imposing restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of certain assets.
Zato niti kolizijska pravila, v skladu s katerimi za nepremičnine velja drugačno pravo kot za premičnine, niti določbe o nujnem deležu zapuščine, ki določajo večji delež, kot ga določa pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje v skladu s to uredbo, ne veljajo za posebna pravila o omejitvah, ki zadevajo dedovanje določenega premoženja ali nanj vplivajo.
To ensure uniform handling of a situation in which it is uncertain in what order two or more persons whose succession would be governed by different laws died, this Regulation should lay down a rule providing that none of the deceased persons is to have any rights in the succession of the other or others.
Da bi zagotovili enotno obravnavo primerov, ko umreta dve ali več oseb, katerih dedovanje bi urejali različni pravni sistemi, vrstni red smrti teh oseb pa ni gotov, bi moralo biti v tej uredbi določeno, da nobena od teh umrlih oseb nima dednih pravic po drugem ali drugih.
In some situations an estate may be left without a claimant.
V določenih okoliščinah se lahko zgodi, da je zapuščina brez dediča.
Different laws provide differently for such situations.
V različnih pravnih sistemih so ti primeri različno urejeni.
Under some laws, the State will be able to claim the vacant estate as an heir irrespective of where the assets are located.
Po nekaterih pravih ima država na primer pravico do dedovanja, ne glede na to, kje se premoženje nahaja.
Under some other laws, the State will be able to appropriate only the assets located on its territory.
Po nekaterih drugih pravih pa si lahko država prisvoji samo premoženje, ki je na njenem ozemlju.
This Regulation should therefore lay down a rule providing that the application of the law applicable to the succession should not preclude a Member State from appropriating under its own law the assets located on its territory.
V tej uredbi bi bilo zato treba določiti, da uporaba prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ne bi smela preprečevati državi članici, da si po svojem pravu prisvoji premoženje, ki se nahaja na njenem ozemlju.