natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Based on those findings, it is necessary to take measures to further reinforce SOLVIT and increase its visibility on and off line, as stressed in the Commission Staff Working Document ‘Reinforcing effective problem-solving in the Single Market’, in the Communication on Better Governance for the Single Market [2] and in the EU Citizenship Report [3].
Na podlagi teh ugotovitev je treba sprejeti ukrepe za nadaljnjo okrepitev mreže Solvit in povečanje njene prepoznavnosti tako na spletu kot tudi drugje, kakor poudarjajo delovni dokument služb Komisije „Krepitev učinkovitega reševanja težav na enotnem trgu“, sporočilo Komisije o boljšem upravljanju enotnega trga [2] in poročilo o državljanstvu EU [3].
As a part of this exercise, Recommendation 2001/893/EC should be replaced by a new one.
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba Priporočilo 2001/893/ES nadomestiti z novim.
This new Recommendation aims to provide clarity on what SOLVIT should deliver, based on best practice.
Cilj tega novega priporočila je razjasniti naloge mreže Solvit na podlagi najboljše prakse.
It sets out targets and standards for both Member States and the Commission to ensure that businesses and citizens receive effective assistance in those situations where Union law is not being respected.
Določa cilje in standarde za države članice in Komisijo, da se podjetjem in državljanom zagotovi učinkovita pomoč v primerih, ko se zakonodaje Unije ne upošteva.
It also aims to guarantee that SOLVIT centres apply the same rules and deliver the same consistent type of service across the network.
Prav tako namerava zagotoviti, da centri Solvit uporabljajo enaka pravila in v vsej mreži dosledno izvajajo enake vrste storitev.
In order to ensure a consistent interpretation of the mandate across the network, this Recommendation defines the types of cases that should be handled by SOLVIT.
Da bi se čim bolj dosledno pojasnile naloge v vsej mreži, so v tem priporočilu opredeljene vrste primerov, ki bi jih bilo treba obravnavati v mreži Solvit.
Recommendation 2001/893/EC stated that SOLVIT deals with cases of ‘misapplication’ of ‘single market rules’.
V Priporočilu 2001/893/ES je bilo navedeno, da se mreža Solvit ukvarja s primeri „napačne uporabe […] pravil enotnega trga“.
Defining the scope in this way has led to inconsistency.
Takšna opredelitev obsega je botrovala nedoslednostim.
First it has been argued that the term misapplication implies that SOLVIT centres cannot deal with cases where national rules run counter to Union law (so called ‘structural cases’), and second that SOLVIT can only act where the Union legislation in question has an internal market basis.
Prvič, navedeno je bilo, da izraz napačna uporaba pomeni, da se centri Solvit ne morejo ukvarjati s primeri, kadar so nacionalna pravila v nasprotju z zakonodajo Unije (t. i. „strukturni primeri“), in, drugič, da lahko mreža Solvit posreduje samo, če zadevna zakonodaja Unije temelji na notranjem trgu.
SOLVIT cases are now defined as all cross-border problems caused by a potential breach of Union law governing the internal market by a public authority, where and to the extent such problems are not subject to legal proceedings at either national or EU level.
Primeri mreže Solvit naj bi zdaj zajemali vse čezmejne probleme, ki jih povzroča morebitna kršitev zakonodaje Unije, ki ureja notranji trg, s strani javnega organa, kadar takšni problemi niso predmet sodnih postopkov bodisi na nacionalni ravni bodisi na ravni EU.
The term ‘breach’ is used to specify that SOLVIT centres take on as a SOLVIT case all situations where public authorities do not respect Union law governing the internal market, regardless of the root cause of the problem.
Z izrazom „kršitev“ je določeno, da centri Solvit sprejmejo v obravnavo vse primere, v katerih javni organi ne spoštujejo zakonodaje Unije, ki ureja notranji trg, ne glede na temeljni vzrok problema.
The overwhelming majority of cases handled by SOLVIT reflect situations wherein a public authority incorrectly applies Union law governing the internal market.
Velika večina zadev, ki jih obravnava mreža Solvit, odraža razmere, v katerih javni organ nepravilno uporabi zakonodajo Unije, ki ureja notranji trg.
However, SOLVIT centres have also shown to be able to offer effective help where structural problems arise.
Vendar pa so centri Solvit pokazali tudi, da lahko ponudijo učinkovito pomoč, kadar pride do strukturnih težav.
Although structural cases present only a small part of SOLVIT’s overall case load, the take-up of such cases by SOLVIT is important to ensure that such problems do not pass unnoticed.
Čeprav strukturni primeri pomenijo le majhen del celotne delovne obremenitve mreže Solvit, je sprejemanje takih primerov pomembno, da se zagotovi, da se takšni problemi ne spregledajo.
It offers the best guarantee that the structural problems are effectively tackled at the appropriate level.
Ponuja najboljše zagotovilo, da se strukturni problemi uspešno rešujejo na ustrezni ravni.
This Recommendation confirms that SOLVIT deals with cases presenting a cross-border problem with a public authority.
To priporočilo potrjuje, da se mreža Solvit ukvarja s primeri, ki zadevajo čezmejni problem v zvezi z javnim organom.
The cross-border criterion ensures that a SOLVIT case is handled by SOLVIT centres in two Member States, which guarantees transparency and quality of outcomes.
Čezmejno merilo zagotavlja, da se primer Solvit obravnava v centrih Solvit v dveh državah članicah, kar zagotavlja preglednost in kakovost rezultatov.
The public authority criterion is linked to the fact that SOLVIT is part of the national administration and acts on an informal basis only.
Merilo v zvezi z javnim organom je povezano z dejstvom, da je mreža Solvit del nacionalne uprave in deluje samo na neformalni osnovi.
This Recommendation also seeks to clarify the level of service individuals and businesses can expect from SOLVIT.
To priporočilo skuša tudi razjasniti, kakšno raven storitev lahko posamezniki in podjetja pričakujejo od mreže Solvit.
It indicates how applicants should be informed and what minimum assistance they should be offered.
Navaja, kako bi morali biti prijavitelji obveščeni in kakšno minimalno pomoč bi jim bilo treba zagotoviti.
It also clarifies the various procedural steps and deadlines to be respected when handling a SOLVIT case together with the follow-up to be given when a case cannot be resolved.
Pojasnjuje tudi različne postopkovne korake in roke, ki jih je treba spoštovati pri obravnavanju primera Solvit, poleg tega pa tudi nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi s primerom, kadar tega ni mogoče rešiti.
Further, this Recommendation sets out minimum standards SOLVIT centres should comply with, in terms of organisation, legal expertise, and relations with other networks.
To priporočilo tudi določa minimalne standarde, ki bi jih morali izpolnjevati centri Solvit, kar zadeva organizacijo, pravno strokovno znanje in izkušnje ter odnose z drugimi mrežami.
It also clarifies the role of the Commission within the SOLVIT network.
Pojasnjuje tudi vlogo Komisije v okviru mreže Solvit.
The Commission has recently rebuilt the SOLVIT online database as a stand-alone module in the Internal Market Information system.
Komisija je pred kratkim prenovila spletno zbirko podatkov Solvit in jo vzpostavila kot samostojni modul v informacijskem sistemu za notranji trg.
Given this technical integration, the rules set out in Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System and repealing Commission Decision 2008/49/EC (the ‘IMI Regulation’) [4] on the processing of personal data and of confidential information also apply to SOLVIT procedures.
Kar zadeva to tehnično integracijo, pravila iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1024/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o upravnem sodelovanju prek informacijskega sistema za notranji trg in razveljavitvi Odločbe Komisije 2008/49/ES [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba IMI) o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in zaupnosti informacij veljajo tudi za postopke mreže Solvit.
This Recommendation further specifies certain aspects of the processing of personal data in SOLVIT, in accordance with the IMI Regulation.
To priporočilo podrobneje opredeljuje nekatere vidike obdelave osebnih podatkov v mreži Solvit v skladu z uredbo IMI.
This Recommendation does not aim to specify how the Commission deals with complaints it receives directly and does not prejudice in any manner the Commission’s role as the guardian of the Treaties.
Cilj tega priporočila ni določiti, kako naj Komisija obravnava pritožbe, ki jih prejme neposredno, in na noben način ne posega v vlogo Komisije kot varuhinje pogodb.
It also does not aim to specify the role of EU Pilot and the national EU Pilot coordinators.
Prav tako ne namerava natančno opredeliti vloge projekta „EU pilot“ in nacionalnih koordinatorjev tega projekta.
These elements are addressed in specific guidelines, which are regularly updated.
Ti elementi se obravnavajo v posebnih smernicah, ki se redno posodabljajo –
I. OBJECTIVE AND DEFINITIONS
I. CILJI IN OPREDELITVE POJMOV
A. Objective
A. Cilj
This Recommendation sets out principles governing the functioning of SOLVIT.
To priporočilo določa načela, ki urejajo delovanje mreže Solvit.
SOLVIT aims to deliver fast, effective and informal solutions to problems individuals and businesses encounter when their EU rights in the internal market are being denied by public authorities.
Solvit si prizadeva za hitro, učinkovito in neformalno reševanje problemov, s katerimi se srečujejo posamezniki in podjetja, če javni organi kršijo njihove pravice EU na notranjem trgu.
It contributes to a better functioning single market by fostering and promoting better compliance with Union law.
Prispeva k boljšemu delovanju enotnega trga s spodbujanjem upoštevanja zakonodaje Unije.
To achieve this purpose, national SOLVIT centres should work together on the basis of the principles set out in this Recommendation.
Za uresničitev tega cilja bi morali nacionalni centri Solvit sodelovati na podlagi načel iz tega priporočila.
B. Definitions
B. Opredelitev pojmov
‘Applicant’
„prijavitelj“
a natural or legal person encountering a cross-border problem and submitting it to SOLVIT directly or through an intermediary, or an organisation submitting a concrete problem on behalf of its member(s);
fizična ali pravna oseba, ki naleti na čezmejni problem in ga predloži mreži Solvit neposredno ali prek posrednika, ali organizacija, ki predloži konkreten problem v imenu svojega(-ih) člana(-ov);
‘Cross-border problem’
„čezmejni problem“
a problem an applicant in one Member State encounters involving a potential breach of EU law governing the internal market by a public authority in another Member State; this includes problems caused to applicants by their own public administrations, after having exercised their free movement rights or when trying to do so;
problem, na katerega naleti prijavitelj v eni od držav članic in vključuje morebitno kršitev zakonodaje EU, ki ureja notranji trg, s strani javnega organa v drugi državi članici; to vključuje probleme, ki jih prijaviteljem povzročijo njihove lastne javne uprave po uveljavljanju njihovih pravic do prostega gibanja ali pri poskusu njihovega uveljavljanja;
‘Union law governing the internal market’
„zakonodaja Unije, ki ureja notranji trg“
any Union legislation, rules or principles related to the functioning of the internal market within the meaning of Article 26(2) TFEU.
vsa zakonodaja Unije, pravila ali načela v zvezi z delovanjem notranjega trga v smislu člena 26(2) PDEU.
This includes rules that do not aim to regulate the internal market as such but have an impact on the free movement of goods, services, persons or capital between Member States;
To vključuje pravila, katerih cilj ni urejanje notranjega trga kot takšnega, ampak vplivajo na prost pretok blaga, storitev, oseb ali kapitala med državami članicami;
‘Public authority’
„javni organ“
any part of the public administration of a Member State, at national, regional or local level, or any body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible, pursuant to a measure adopted by the State, for providing a public service under the control of the State and that has for that purpose special powers beyond those which result from the normal rules applicable in relations between individuals;
kateri koli del javne uprave države članice na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni ali kateri koli organ, ne glede na njegovo pravno obliko, na katerega je bila prenesena odgovornost na podlagi ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela država, za zagotavljanje javnih storitev pod nadzorom države in ki ima za ta namen posebna pooblastila poleg tistih, ki izhajajo iz običajnih pravil, ki se uporabljajo na področju odnosov med posamezniki;
‘Legal proceedings’
„sodni postopek“
formal proceedings for the resolution of a dispute before a judicial or quasi-judicial body.
formalni postopek za reševanje spora pred sodnim ali kvazisodnim organom.
This excludes administrative appeals against the same authority that has caused the problem;
To izključuje upravne pritožbe zoper isti organ, ki je problem povzročil;
‘Structural problem’
„strukturni problem“
a breach caused by a national rule running counter to Union law;
kršitev zaradi nacionalnega predpisa, ki je v nasprotju z zakonodajo Unije;
‘Home Centre’
„domači center“
the SOLVIT centre in the Member State that has the closest links with the applicant based on for example nationality, residence, establishment or the place where the applicant acquired the rights at stake;
center Solvit v državi članici, ki je najtesneje povezan s prijaviteljem, na primer na podlagi državljanstva, stalnega prebivališča, sedeža ali kraja, v katerem je prijavitelj pridobil zadevne pravice;
‘Lead Centre’
„odgovorni center“
the SOLVIT centre of the Member State in which the alleged breach of Union law governing the internal market has occurred;
center Solvit v državi članici, v kateri je prišlo do domnevne kršitve zakonodaje Unije, ki ureja notranji trg;
‘SOLVIT database’
„zbirka podatkov Solvit“
the online application created within the Internal Market Information System (IMI) to support the handling of SOLVIT cases.
spletna aplikacija, ki je nastala v okviru informacijskega sistema za notranji trg (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IMI) v podporo obravnavanja primerov mreže Solvit.
MANDATE OF SOLVIT
NALOGE MREŽE SOLVIT
The SOLVIT network deals with cross-border problems caused by a potential breach of Union law governing the internal market by a public authority, where and to the extent such problems are not subject to legal proceedings at either national or Union level.
Mreža Solvit se ukvarja s čezmejnimi problemi, ki jih povzroča morebitna kršitev zakonodaje Unije, ki ureja notranji trg, s strani javnega organa, kadar takšni problemi niso predmet sodnih postopkov bodisi na nacionalni ravni bodisi na ravni Unije.
SERVICE OFFERED BY SOLVIT
STORITVE, KI JIH PONUJA MREŽA SOLVIT
Member States should ensure that applicants can benefit from the following minimum service:
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so prijaviteljem na voljo naslednje minimalne storitve:
SOLVIT centres should be available by telephone or e-mail, and should provide a prompt reply to communications directed to them.
Centri Solvit bi morali biti dostopni prek telefona ali elektronske pošte in poskrbeti za hiter odgovor na sporočila, ki so nanje naslovljena.
Applicants should receive within one week a first reaction to their problem, including an indication whether or not SOLVIT could take on their case, if such indication is possible on the basis of the information provided.
Prijavitelji bi morali v roku enega tedna prejeti prvi odziv na problem, vključno z navedbo, ali mreža Solvit lahko sprejme njihov primer ali ne, če je to mogoče na podlagi predloženih informacij.
If necessary, they should at the same time be invited to submit any documentation needed to process their file.
Po potrebi bi jih morala mreža Solvit hkrati pozvati, naj predložijo dokumentacijo, potrebno za obdelavo njihovega spisa.
Within one month after this first assessment and provided their file is complete, applicants should receive a confirmation of whether their case is accepted by the Lead centre and therefore opened as a SOLVIT case.
Če je njihova dokumentacija popolna, bi morali prijavitelji v enem mesecu po tej prvi oceni prejeti potrditev, ali bo odgovorni center njihov primer sprejel in ga s tem odprl kot primer Solvit.
When a problem cannot be taken up as a SOLVIT case, applicants should be given reasons and be advised of another possible course of action that might help them overcome the problem, including signposting or transferring the problem, where possible, to another relevant information or problem-solving network or to the relevant national competent authority.
Če problema ni mogoče sprejeti, bi bilo treba to prijaviteljem utemeljiti in jim svetovati glede drugih možnih poti, ki bi jim lahko pomagale pri rešitvi problema, vključno z nadaljnjimi napotki ali posredovanjem problema, če je to mogoče, drugi relevantni informacijski mreži ali mreži za reševanje problemov ali zadevnemu pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu.
Within 10 weeks from the date of opening of the case, the applicant should receive a solution to its problem, which may include a clarification of the applicable Union law.
V desetih tednih od datuma odprtja primera bi moral prijavitelj prejeti rešitev svojega problema, ki lahko vključuje pojasnitev veljavne zakonodaje Unije.
In exceptional circumstances and in particular where a solution is close at hand or where it concerns a structural problem, the case can be kept open beyond the deadline, subject to informing the applicant, up to a maximum of 10 weeks.
V izjemnih okoliščinah in predvsem ko je primer že skoraj rešen ali če gre za strukturni problem, je lahko primer odprt še po zadevnem roku, pod pogojem, da se prijavitelja o tem obvesti, in sicer za največ deset tednov.
Applicants should be informed about the informal nature of SOLVIT and the procedures and timeframes that apply.
Prijavitelji bi morali biti obveščeni o neformalni naravi mreže Solvit ter o postopkih in rokih, ki se uporabljajo.
This information should include information about other possible means of redress, a warning that handling a case in SOLVIT does not put on hold national deadlines for appeal, and that solutions offered by SOLVIT are informal and cannot be appealed.
Te informacije bi morale vključevati informacije o drugih možnih pravnih sredstvih, opozorilo, da obravnavanje primera v mreži Solvit ne zadrži nacionalnih rokov za vložitev pritožbe ter da so rešitve, ki jih ponuja mreža Solvit, neformalne in se nanje ni mogoče pritožiti.
Applicants should also be informed that SOLVIT is free of charge.
Prijavitelji bi morali biti obveščeni tudi o tem, da je sistem Solvit brezplačen.
Applicants should be regularly informed about the state of their case.
Prijavitelje bi bilo treba redno obveščati o stanju primera.
Whereas SOLVIT proceedings are of an informal nature, it does not preclude an applicant from launching formal proceedings at national level, which will result in closure of the SOLVIT case.
Ker so postopki mreže Solvit neformalne narave, prijavitelju ne preprečujejo, da začne formalni postopek na nacionalni ravni, kar bo povzročilo zaprtje primera Solvit.
When a successful outcome has been found, the applicant should be advised on actions to take in order to benefit from the proposed solution.
Kadar mreža Solvit uspešno reši primer, mora prijavitelju svetovati glede ukrepov, ki jih mora sprejeti, da bi predlagano rešitev uresničil.
As soon as it becomes apparent that a case will not be resolved within SOLVIT, the case should be closed and the applicant should be informed without delay.
Takoj, ko postane očitno, da zadeve ne bo mogoče rešiti v okviru mreže Solvit, bi bilo treba primer zapreti in nemudoma obvestiti prijavitelja.
In such case, SOLVIT should also advise the applicant on other possible ways of redress at national or Union level.
Tudi v takem primeru bi morala mreža Solvit prijavitelja obvestiti o drugih možnih pravnih sredstvih na nacionalni ravni ali na ravni Unije.
When advising complainants to file a complaint with the Commission, SOLVIT centres should encourage them to refer to prior proceedings in SOLVIT (by giving a reference number and shortly summarising these proceedings).
Če centri Solvit pritožnikom svetujejo, da vložijo pritožbo pri Komisiji, bi jih morali spodbujati, da pregledajo prejšnje postopke v mreži Solvit (navesti bi morali referenčno številko in te postopke na kratko povzeti).
Unresolved cases should be systematically reported to the Commission through the database.
O nerešenih primerih bi bilo treba sistematično poročati Komisiji prek zbirke podatkov.
After closing the case, applicants should be invited to give their feedback on how the case has been handled by SOLVIT.
Po zaključku primera bi morali biti prijavitelji pozvani, da dajo povratne informacije o tem, kako je mreža Solvit ta primer obravnavala.
ORGANISATION OF SOLVIT CENTRES
ORGANIZACIJA CENTROV SOLVIT
Each Member State should have a SOLVIT centre.
Vsaka država članica bi morala imeti svoj center Solvit.
To secure that SOLVIT centres can fulfil the tasks set out in this Recommendation, Member States should ensure that SOLVIT centres:
Da bi države članice poskrbele, da lahko centri Solvit izpolnjujejo naloge iz tega priporočila, bi morale zagotoviti, da:
have sufficient and well-trained staff with an operational knowledge of more than one Union language where needed to ensure fast and transparent communication with other SOLVIT centres;
imajo centri Solvit dovolj osebja, ki je dobro usposobljeno, z operativnim znanjem več kot enega jezika Unije, če je to potrebno, da se zagotovi hitra in pregledna komunikacija z drugimi centri Solvit;
have adequate legal expertise or relevant experience with the application of Union law in order to be able to make independent legal assessments of cases;
imajo centri Solvit ustrezno pravno znanje ali zadevne izkušnje z uporabo zakonodaje Unije, da lahko sprejemajo neodvisne pravne ocene primerov;
are situated in the part of the national administration with sufficient powers of coordination to be able to ensure the correct implementation of Union law within their administration;
so centri Solvit del nacionalne uprave z zadostnimi pooblastili za usklajevanje, da lahko zagotovijo pravilno izvrševanje zakonodaje Unije znotraj svoje uprave;
are able to establish a network within the national administration in order to have access to the specific legal expertise and support needed in order to find practical solutions to cases.
so centri Solvit sposobni vzpostaviti mrežo v okviru nacionalne uprave, prek katere imajo dostop do posebnega pravnega strokovnega znanja in podpore, ki je potrebna za praktično reševanje primerov.
V. SOLVIT PROCEDURE
V. POSTOPEK REŠEVANJA PRIMEROV SOLVIT
A. Principles governing the handling of SOLVIT cases
A. Načela, ki urejajo obravnavanje primerov Solvit
All SOLVIT cases should be handled by two SOLVIT centres, the Home centre and the Lead centre.
Vse primere Solvit bi morala obravnavati dva centra Solvit, in sicer domači in odgovorni center.
The Home and Lead centres should cooperate in an open and transparent manner with a view to finding fast and effective solutions for applicants.
Domači in odgovorni centri bi morali sodelovati na odprt in pregleden način, da bi se primeri prijaviteljev hitro in učinkovito rešili.
The Home and Lead centres should agree what language they use to communicate with each other, bearing in mind the aim of resolving the problems through informal contacts as quickly and efficiently as possible and ensuring transparency and reporting.
Domači in odgovorni centri bi se morali dogovoriti, kateri jezik uporabljati za medsebojno sporazumevanje, pri čemer bi morali upoštevati cilj, da se problemi rešijo prek neuradnih stikov čim hitreje in učinkoviteje ter da se zagotovi preglednost in izpolni zahteva po poročanju.