natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, given the establishment of a pattern of export prices which differed significantly among different purchasers, regions and time periods, and given that the two symmetrical methods would not reflect the full degree of dumping, it has been decided, in accordance with the second sentence of Article 2(11), to establish the dumping margin on the basis of the asymmetrical method.
Zato je bilo glede na določitev vzorca izvoznih cen, ki se je znatno razlikoval med različnimi kupci, regijami in časovnimi obdobji, ter ker simetrični metodi ne bi odražali celotnega obsega dampinga, sklenjeno, da se v skladu z drugim stavkom člena 2(11) stopnja dampinga določi na podlagi asimetrične metode.
Both cooperating companies and the ÇIB claimed that it was unjustified to compare export prices converted in Turkish Lira, given the fact that sales to the Union have been made in euro while Turkish Lira is only used for accountancy reasons.
Obe sodelujoči družbi in združenje ÇIB so trdili, da je bilo neupravičeno primerjati izvozne cene, preračunane v turške lire, glede na to, da je prodaja v Unijo potekala v eurih, medtem ko se turška lira uporablja samo v računovodske namene.
It was argued that currency exchange fluctuations between euro and Turkish Lira have had a significant effect on the price determinations which would inevitably affect the result of export price comparison between different time periods in an unjustified manner.
Trdilo se je, da je imelo nihanje menjalnih tečajev eura in turške lire znaten učinek na določitev cene, kar bi neizogibno in na neupravičen način vplivalo na rezultat primerjave izvozne cene v različnih časovnih obdobjih.
However, the Commission’s consistent practice is to carry out export price comparison and dumping margin calculations in the accounting currency of cooperating exporting producers in the exporting country.
Vendar je dosledna praksa Komisije, da izvede primerjavo izvozne cene in izračun stopnje dampinga v obračunski valuti sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v državi izvoznici.
It should be noted that costs and domestic prices used as a basis for normal value are expressed in Turkish Lira.
Treba je opozoriti, da so stroški in domače cene, ki so bili uporabljeni za določitev normalne vrednosti, izraženi v turški liri.
Consequently, the comparison of export prices with the normal value is carried out in that currency.
Zato je primerjava izvoznih cen z normalno vrednostjo v navedeni valuti.
Thus, the only logical approach to establish a pattern of export prices, within the framework of the same dumping calculation, is to use the same export prices already expressed in Turkish Lira.
Tako je edini logični pristop za ugotovitev vzorca izvoznih cen, v okviru istega izračuna dampinga, uporaba istih izvoznih cen, ki so že navedene v turških lirah.
In addition, as stated above, the basic Regulation does not require an analysis of possible reasons of targeted dumping, such as exchange rate fluctuations [7].
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno zgoraj, osnovna uredba ne zahteva analize možnih vzrokov za usmerjen damping, kot je nihanje menjalnih tečajev [7].
Both cooperating exporting producers claimed that, in order to establish a pattern of export prices, weighted average prices of comparable product types should be taken into account rather than arithmetic average prices.
Oba sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila, da bi bilo za določitev vzorca izvoznih cen treba upoštevati tehtane povprečne cene primerljivih vrst izdelka in ne aritmetičnih povprečnih cen.
However, Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation refers to a pattern of export prices and not to a pattern of weighted average export prices or a pattern of export values.
Vendar pa se člen 2(11) osnovne uredbe nanaša na vzorec izvoznih cen in ne na vzorec tehtanih povprečnih izvoznih cen ali vzorec izvoznih vrednosti.
The use of a weighted average export price would distort the analysis by taking into account the volume of exports instead of only the export prices.
Uporaba tehtane povprečne izvozne cene bi zaradi upoštevanja obsega izvoza in ne le izvoznih cen izkrivila analizo.
In any case, even when weighted average prices are used instead of arithmetic average export prices, a pattern of export prices could still be established which differs significantly among different purchasers and regions, as well as time periods.
V vsakem primeru, tudi če se namesto aritmetičnega povprečja izvoznih cen uporabi tehtano povprečje cen, je bilo še vedno mogoče določiti vzorec izvoznih cen, ki se bistveno razlikuje glede na različne kupce in regije ter časovna obdobja.
Two parties contested the significance of differences in patterns of export prices, if any, in case weighted averages are used.
Dve strani sta ugovarjali pomembnosti razlik, če te sploh obstajajo, v primeru ko se uporabijo tehtana povprečja.
It is noted that the parties do not contest the factual findings based on the arithmetic average, which is the appropriate methodology as explained above.
Opozoriti je treba, da strani ne izpodbijajo dejanskih ugotovitev, ki temeljijo na aritmetičnem povprečju, kar je ustrezna metodologija, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj.
The ÇIB claimed that the application of zeroing is unjustified by referring to a WTO Appellate Body Report [8] (the Bed Linen Report) in which the zeroing practice was found to be contrary to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement.
Združenje ÇIB je trdilo, da je uporaba ničelne nastavitve neupravičena, in se sklicevalo na poročilo pritožbenega organa STO [8], v katerem je bilo ugotovljeno, da je ničelna nastavitev v nasprotju s Protidampinškim sporazumom STO.
The General Court [9] has, however, confirmed that the findings of the Bed Linen Report are not applicable in a situation of targeted dumping.
Vendar je Splošno sodišče [9] (Poročilo o posteljnem perilu) potrdilo, da ugotovitve Poročila o posteljnem perilu ne veljajo v primeru usmerjenega dampinga.
Indeed, the Bed linen Report concerns only the zeroing technique in the context of the first symmetrical method and cannot be considered to deal with this mechanism when it is used in the context of the asymmetrical method.
Poročilo o posteljnem perilu zadeva samo tehniko ničelne nastavitve v okviru prve simetrične metode in se ne more šteti za obravnavo tega mehanizma, kadar se uporablja v okviru asimetrične metode.
Therefore, even if, as the WTO Appellate Body found, it might indeed be contrary to Article 2.4.2 of the 1994 Anti-dumping Code and unfair to employ the zeroing technique in the context of the first symmetrical method, and especially in the absence of an export price pattern, it is not contrary to that provision or to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, nor is it unfair within the meaning of Article 2(10) of that Regulation, to employ the zeroing technique in the context of the asymmetrical method, where the two conditions for applying that method are met.
Torej tudi če bi dejansko bilo v nasprotju s členom 2.4.2 Protidampinškega sporazuma iz leta 1994, kot je ugotovil pritožbeni organ STO, in bi bila uporaba tehnike ničelne nastavitve v okviru prve simetrične metode nepoštena, še posebej ob odsotnosti vzorca izvozne cene, pa uporaba tehnike ničelne nastavitve v okviru asimetrične metode ni v nasprotju z navedeno določbo ali členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe ali nepoštena v smislu člena 2(10) navedene uredbe, pri čemer sta izpolnjena pogoja za uporabo navedene metode.
Furthermore, the zeroing technique has proved to be mathematically necessary in order to distinguish, in terms of its results, the asymmetrical method from the first symmetrical method.
Poleg tega se je izkazalo, da je tehnika ničelne nastavitve matematično potrebna za razlikovanje asimetrične metode od prve simetrične metode na podlagi rezultatov.
In the absence of that reduction, the asymmetrical method will always yield the same result as the first symmetrical method.
Brez navedene redukcije pripelje asimetrična metoda vedno do enakega rezultata kot prva simetrična metoda.
Further, the ÇIB claimed that the use of zeroing causes a violation of the lesser duty rule.
Poleg tega je združenje ÇIB trdilo, da uporaba ničelne nastavitve povzroči kršitev pravila nižje dajatve.
It was argued that, because of the zeroing practice used, margins of dumping have been calculated at a level higher than they should actually have been.
Trdilo se je, da so bile zaradi uporabe ničelne nastavitve stopnje dampinga izračunane na ravni, ki je višja od dejanske.
However, the use of zeroing in the asymmetrical method does not preclude the application of the lesser duty rule.
Vendar pa uporaba ničelne nastavitve pri asimetrični metodi ne izključuje uporabe pravila nižje dajatve.
For all three cooperating companies the dumping margins, regardless of the methodology used, have been compared with the companies’ injury elimination levels to ensure that the lower of the two would determine the duty.
Za vse tri sodelujoče družbe so bile stopnje dampinga, ne glede na uporabljeno metodologijo, primerjane s stopnjami odprave škode družbe, da se zagotovi, da se dajatev določi na nižji od teh dveh stopenj.
In the absence of any other comments in respect of the dumping margins for companies investigated, the findings in recitals 47 and 48 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s stopnjami dampinga za preiskovane družbe ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 47 in 48 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Dumping margin for non-cooperating companies
Stopnja dampinga za nesodelujoča podjetja
In the absence of any comments concerning the dumping margin for non-cooperating companies, the provisional findings in recital 49 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s stopnjo dampinga za nesodelujoča podjetja ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 49 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The countrywide dumping margins finally determined, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are the following:
Stopnje dampinga na ravni države, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, so:
Union production, Union industry and consumption
Proizvodnja Unije, industrija Unije in potrošnja
In the absence of any comments with regard to Union production, Union industry and consumption the content of recitals 51 to 54 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s proizvodnjo Unije, industrijo Unije in potrošnjo ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 51 do 54 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Following provisional disclosure, the ÇIB argued that the cumulative assessment of dumped imports from the two countries concerned is not warranted.
Po začasnem razkritju je združenje ÇIB trdilo, da kumulativna ocena dampinškega uvoza iz obeh zadevnih držav ni utemeljena.
In principle, they echoed the comments made by the Turkish exporting producers following the initiation and claimed that imports from Russia and Turkey show different trends in terms of volume and prices.
V osnovi je ponovilo pripombe turških proizvajalcev izvoznikov po začetku postopka in trdilo, da uvoz iz Rusije in Turčije kaže drugačne trende glede obsega in cen.
It is reiterated in this regard, as already stated in recital 59 of the provisional Regulation, that the investigation established that while imports from Turkey are relatively stable in terms of volumes, imports from Russia are increasing in absolute terms.
Glede tega se ponovno poudari, kot je navedeno že v uvodni izjavi 59 začasne uredbe, da je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da medtem ko je uvoz iz Turčije relativno stabilen v smislu obsega, se uvoz iz Rusije povečuje v absolutnem smislu.
At the same time their pricing do not appear to be substantially different, with Russian average prices being somewhat lower but very close to the average Turkish prices.
Hkrati se zdi, da se njuno oblikovanje cen bistveno ne razlikuje, da so ruske povprečne cene nekoliko nižje, vendar zelo blizu turškim povprečnim cenam.
It is also reiterated in this regard that for companies in both countries the investigation established significant undercutting of up to ca. 30 % (see recital 65 of the provisional Regulation).
V zvezi s tem se tudi ponovno poudarja, da je preiskava za družbe v obeh državah pokazala znatno nelojalno nižanje cen do približno 30 % (glej uvodno izjavo 65 začasne uredbe).
Consequently, the claim is rejected.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
The ÇIB also argued that imports from Turkey should be considered insignificant and pointed out that in a previous case concerning a similar product — namely in ‘pipe and tube fittings from the PRC, Croatia, Slovakia, Taiwan and Thailand’ [10] — imports from Slovakia and Taiwan were considered insignificant (although they were above the de minimis threshold) and therefore not cumulated with dumped imports from other countries.
Združenje ÇIB je tudi trdilo, da bi se moral uvoz iz Turčije obravnavati kot zanemarljiv, in poudarilo, da se je v prejšnjem primeru v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom – in sicer „pribor (fitingi) za cevi iz LRK, Hrvaške, Slovaške, Tajvana in Tajske“ [10] – uvoz iz Slovaške in Tajvana obravnaval kot zanemarljiv (čeprav je bil nad pragom de minimis) in zato ni bil prištet k dampinškemu uvozu iz drugih držav.
It is noted in this regard that in pipe and tube fittings from the PRC, Croatia, Slovakia, Taiwan and Thailand, imports from Slovakia and Taiwan were indeed found to be dumped and despite being above the 1 % market share threshold they were not cumulated with other dumped imports.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bilo v primeru pribora (fitingi) za cevi iz LRK, Hrvaške, Slovaške, Tajvana in Tajske ugotovljeno, da gre pri uvozu iz Slovaške in Tajvana za damping in kljub temu, da je ta presegal prag 1 % tržnega deleža, se ni prištel k ostalemu dampinškemu uvozu.
The situation in that case, however, was very different from the current one, as imports from Slovakia and Taiwan were actually sharply losing their market share and were not considered significant when compared to the volume of imports from the other countries and consequently were considered not to be causing injury.
Razmere v navedenem primeru pa so se močno razlikovale od sedanjih, saj je uvoz iz Slovaške in Tajvana dejansko močno izgubljal na tržnem deležu ter se v primerjavi z obsegom uvoza iz drugih držav ni štel za pomembnega, zato se ni štelo, da povzroča škodo.
In contrast, in the case at hand imports from both Turkey and Russia are increasing their market share and are comparable to each other in terms of volumes.
Nasprotno pa v sedanjem primeru uvoz iz Turčije in Rusije povečuje svoj tržni delež in je medsebojno primerljiv v smislu obsega.
The ÇIB also argued that imports from Turkey and Russia are not similar in terms of conditions of competition as there are ‘differences in geographical concentration of sales’.
Združenje ÇIB je tudi trdilo, da si uvoza iz Turčije in Rusije nista podobna v smislu konkurenčnih pogojev, saj obstajajo „razlike v geografski koncentraciji prodaje“.
They have provided statistics showing that during the IP Turkey has concentrated over 70 % of their sales on Spain, France, Italy and Poland, while Russia concentrated almost all of their sales on the Czech Republic and Germany.
Predložilo je statistične podatke, ki kažejo, da je Turčija v OP 70 % svoje prodaje osredotočila na Španijo, Francijo, Italijo in Poljsko, medtem ko je Rusija skoraj vso svojo prodajo osredotočila na Češko in Nemčijo.
It is noted in this regard that differences in geographical concentration of sales cannot be considered to be an indication of different conditions of competition.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da se razlik v geografski koncentraciji prodaje ne more šteti kot pokazatelja različnih konkurenčnih pogojev.
Given that the Union is a single market, the point of entry of any imports will normally not be decisive for the competitiveness of those imports with each other and vis-à-vis the like product.
Glede na skupni trg Unije vstopna točka katerega koli uvoza običajno ni odločilna za medsebojno konkurenčnost teh uvozov in tudi ne v primerjavi s podobnim izdelkom.
It is also reiterated with respect to conditions of competition that Russian and Turkish imports are similar in respect of price and were both found to undercut Union prices and that their channels of sales are similar.
Ponovno se poudarja, da sta si glede pogojev konkurence ruski in turški uvoz cenovno podobna, da je bilo za oba ugotovljeno nelojalno nižanje cen Unije in da imata podobne prodajne poti.
In the absence of any other comments with regard to cumulative assessment of the dumped imports from the countries concerned the content of recitals 55 to 60 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s kumulativno oceno dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 55 do 60 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Volume, market share of the dumped imports concerned, their import prices and undercutting
Obseg, tržni delež zadevnega dampinškega uvoza, uvozne cene in nelojalno nižanje cen.
In the absence of any comments with regard to volume and market share of the dumped imports concerned, their import prices and undercutting, the content of recitals 61 to 65 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z obsegom in tržnim deležem zadevnega dampinškega uvoza, uvoznimi cenami in nelojalnim nižanjem cen ni bilo pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 61 do 65 začasne uredbe potrdi.
It is reiterated that the dumped product concerned originating in the countries concerned sold in the Union undercut the Union industry’s prices by up to about 30 %.
Ponovno se poudarja, da je zadevni dampinški izdelek s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, prodan v Uniji, nelojalno znižal prodajne cene industrije Unije za do približno 30 %.
Following provisional disclosure, the ÇIB and the Turkish Government claimed that given that the Union industry increased their market share by some 3 % between 2008 and the IP, the Commission should have concluded that the Union industry did not suffer material injury in the period considered.
Po začasnem razkritju sta združenje ÇIB in turška vlada trdila, da glede na to, da je industrija Unije povečala svoj tržni delež za približno 3 % med letom 2008 in OP, bi morala Komisija skleniti, da industrija Unije ni utrpela znatne škode v obravnavanem obdobju.
It is noted in this regard that firstly, it was clearly recognised in the provisional Regulation (see for example recitals 72, 86 or 91 of the provisional Regulation) that there was a slight increase in the market share of the Union industry.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, prvič, da je bilo v začasni uredbi (glej, na primer, uvodne izjave 72, 86 ali 91 začasne uredbe) jasno navedeno, da je bilo opaziti rahlo povečanje tržnega deleža industrije Unije.
Secondly, recital 72 of the provisional Regulation clarifies that the increased market share is a reflection of the fact that the sales volumes of the Union producers dropped slightly less than the consumption in the period considered.
Drugič, uvodna izjava 72 začasne uredbe pojasnjuje, da povečanje tržnega deleža odraža dejstvo, da se je obseg prodaje proizvajalcev Unije znižal nekoliko manj kot potrošnja v obravnavanem obdobju.
Moreover, apart from falling stocks referred to below, it is the only injury indicator that shows a positive development over the period considered.
Poleg tega je, če izvzamemo zmanjšanje zalog, kot je navedeno spodaj, to edini kazalnik škode, ki kaže na pozitiven razvoj v obravnavanem obdobju.
The Turkish government also claimed that a dropping closing stock of the sampled Union producers is an indication of a non-injurious situation of the Union industry.
Turška vlada je tudi trdila, da zmanjšanje končnih zalog vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije kaže na neškodljiv položaj industrije Unije.
It is noted in this regard that indeed as stated in recital 79 of the provisional Regulation the closing stock of the sampled Union producers decreased by 18 % between 2008 and the IP.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so se, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 79 začasne uredbe, končne zaloge vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije zmanjšale za 18 % med letom 2008 in OP.
At the same time it is recognised that a drop in stocks could be seen as a positive sign but only in a situation when sales would be growing at a pace faster than production.
Hkrati se priznava, da je padec zalog mogoče obravnavati kot pozitiven znak, vendar le v primeru, ko bi prodaja rasla hitreje od proizvodnje.
However, this is not the case in the current investigation.
Vendar to ne velja za sedanjo preiskavo.
On the contrary, the drop in stocks in this case is merely a reflection of production volumes dropping at a faster pace than sales.
Nasprotno, zmanjšanje zalog v tem primeru kaže le na to, da se obseg proizvodnje zmanjšuje hitreje kot prodaja.
In this situation the drop in stocks cannot be seen as a positive development.
V tem primeru zmanjšanja zalog ni mogoče obravnavati kot pozitivni razvoj.
In the absence of any other claim or comments, the content of recitals 66 to 88 of the provisional Regulation, including the conclusion that Union industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih trditev ali pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 66 do 88 začasne uredbe, vključno z ugotovitvijo, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe, potrdi.
In the absence of any specific comments, recitals 90 to 93 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 90 do 93 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, the ÇIB and the Turkish Government claimed that the actual cause of any injury suffered by the Union industry would be low priced imports from other third countries and in particular from countries under anti-dumping measures.
Po začasnem razkritju sta ÇIB in turška vlada trdila, da je bil dejanski vzrok škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, poceni uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav in zlasti iz držav, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi.
In this regard it is noted that, as already stated in recital 96 of the provisional Regulation, imports from the eight countries under anti-dumping measures continued to penetrate the Union market although their market share declined from 21 % in 2008 to 17 % in the IP.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, kot je navedeno že v uvodni izjavi 96 začasne uredbe, da je uvoz iz osmih držav, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, še naprej prodiral na trg Unije, čeprav se je njegov tržni delež zmanjšal z 21 % v letu 2008 na 17 % v OP.
Even when the applicable anti-dumping duty is taken into account, the prices of those imports remain low and comparable with the prices of Russian and Turkish imports and are below the average prices of the Union producers.
Tudi če se upošteva veljavna protidampinška dajatev, so cene navedenega uvoza še vedno nizke in primerljive s cenami ruskega in turškega uvoza ter nižje od povprečnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
However, it is noted that for the countries under anti-dumping measures (as for all third countries) only limited statistical information and average prices are available and the established price difference is not necessarily conclusive and may be a result of a different product mix.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da so za države, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi (kot za vse tretje države), na razpolago le omejeni statistični podatki in povprečne cene ter da ugotovljena razlika v ceni ni nujno dokončna, lahko je zavajajoča in je lahko posledica različnega prodajnega programa.
Moreover, imports from countries under anti-dumping measures show a clear downward trend.
Poleg tega kaže uvoz iz držav, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, jasen padajoč trend.
Hence, the conclusion that they were not breaking the causal link between injury to the Union industry and the increased dumped imports from Turkey and Russia.
Zato se ugotavlja, da vzročna zveza med škodo za industrijo Unije ter dampinškim uvozom iz Turčije in Rusije ni bila prekinjena.