natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The total notified restructuring aid measures were (i) a CZK 2500 million loan by the State-owned company Osinek, a.s. (in case it were to be considered state aid);
Celotni priglašeni ukrepi pomoči za prestrukturiranje so vključevali (i) posojilo družbe Osinek, a.s. v državni lasti v višini 2500 milijonov CZK (če bo obravnavano kot državna pomoč);
the de-collateralisation and a debt-for-equity swap of the Osinek loan; and (iii) a guaranteed bank credit in the amount of EUR 20,8 million to finance the acquisition of an aeroplane.
sprostitev zavarovanja in zamenjavo terjatev v lastniške deleže iz naslova posojila Osinek in (iii) zajamčeno bančno posojilo v višini 20,8 milijona EUR za financiranje nakupa letala.
("BA") for a financial consideration in July 2010.
(„BA“) za finančno nadomestilo.
[– 710000 – (– 630000)]
[– 710000–(630000)]
on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Malta
o začetku avtomatizirane izmenjave podatkov o DNK na Malti
Malta has informed the General Secretariat of the Council of the national DNA analysis files to which Articles 2 to 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA apply and the conditions for automated searching as referred to in Article 3(1) of that Decision in accordance with Article 36(2) of that Decision.
Malta je v skladu s členom 36(2) Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ obvestila generalni sekretariat Sveta o nacionalnih zbirkah podatkov o preiskavah DNK, za katere se uporabljajo členi 2 do 6 navedenega sklepa, ter o pogojih za avtomatizirano iskanje iz člena 3(1) navedenega sklepa.
According to Chapter 4, point 1.1 of the Annex to Decision 2008/616/JHA, the questionnaire drawn up by the relevant Council Working Group concerns each of the automated data exchanges and has to be answered by a Member State as soon as it believes it fulfils the prerequisites for sharing data in the relevant data category.
V skladu s točko 1.1 poglavja 4 Priloge k Sklepu 2008/616/PNZ se vprašalnik, ki ga je pripravila ustrezna delovna skupina Sveta, nanaša na vsako avtomatizirano izmenjavo podatkov in ga država članica izpolni takoj, ko meni, da izpolnjuje predpogoje za delitev podatkov v ustrezni kategoriji podatkov.
Malta has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on DNA data exchange.
Malta je izpolnila vprašalnik o varstvu podatkov in vprašalnik o izmenjavi podatkov o DNK.
A successful pilot run has been carried out by Malta with Austria.
Malta je opravila uspešen preskus z Avstrijo.
An evaluation visit has taken place in Malta and a report on the evaluation visit has been produced by the Austrian evaluation team and forwarded to the relevant Council Working Group.
Na Malti je bil opravljen ocenjevalni obisk, o katerem je avstrijska ocenjevalna skupina pripravila poročilo in ga poslala ustrezni delovni skupini Sveta.
For the purposes of automated searching and comparison of DNA data, Malta has fully implemented the general provisions on data protection of Chapter 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA and is entitled to receive and supply personal data pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of that Decision as from the day of the entry into force of this Decision.
Malta za namene avtomatiziranega iskanja in primerjave podatkov o DNK v celoti izvaja splošne določbe o varstvu podatkov iz poglavja 6 Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ ter je upravičena prejemati in pošiljati osebne podatke v skladu s členoma 3 in 4 navedenega sklepa, in sicer od datuma začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa.
on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to dactyloscopic data in Malta
o začetku avtomatizirane izmenjave daktiloskopskih podatkov na Malti
Malta has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on dactyloscopic data exchange.
Malta je izpolnila vprašalnik o varstvu podatkov in vprašalnik o izmenjavi daktiloskopskih podatkov.
A successful pilot run has been carried out by Malta with Austria and France.
Malta je opravila uspešen preskus z Avstrijo in Francijo.
An evaluation visit has taken place in Malta and a report on the evaluation visit has been produced by the Austrian/French evaluation team and forwarded to the relevant Council Working Group.
Na Malti je bil opravljen ocenjevalni obisk, o katerem je avstrijsko-francoska ocenjevalna skupina pripravila poročilo in ga poslala ustrezni delovni skupini Sveta.
For the purposes of automated searching of dactyloscopic data, Malta has fully implemented the general provisions on data protection of Chapter 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA and is entitled to receive and supply personal data pursuant to Article 9 of that Decision as from the day of the entry into force of this Decision.
Malta za namene avtomatiziranega iskanja daktiloskopskih podatkov v celoti izvaja splošne določbe o varstvu podatkov iz poglavja 6 Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ ter je upravičena prejemati in pošiljati osebne podatke na podlagi člena 9 navedenega sklepa, in sicer od datuma začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa.
of 22 March 2013
z dne 22. marca 2013
exempting certain services in the postal sector in Hungary from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services
o izvzetju nekaterih storitev v poštnem sektorju na Madžarskem iz uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev
(notified under document C(2013) 1568)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 1568)
Having regard to Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors [1] and in particular Article 30(5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev [1], zlasti člena 30(5) in (6) Direktive,
On 3 October 2012 Magyar Posta Zrt. transmitted a request pursuant to Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC to the Commission by e-mail.
Družba Magyar Posta Zrt. je 3. oktobra 2012 Komisiji po elektronski pošti poslala zahtevek v skladu s členom 30(5) Direktive 2004/17/ES.
The request submitted by Magyar Posta concerns certain postal services as well as certain services other than postal services provided by the Magyar Posta on the territory of Hungary.
Zahtevek, ki ga je poslala družba Magyar Posta, se nanaša na nekatere poštne storitve, pa tudi na nekatere storitve, ki niso poštne storitve, ki bi jih navedena družba opravljala na madžarskem ozemlju.
The services concerned are described as follows in the request:
Zadevne storitve so v zahtevku opisane tako:
domestic standard consumer parcel services (hereinafter referred to as C2X), which comprise consumer to consumer standard parcel services (hereinafter referred to as C2C) and consumer to business standard parcel services (hereinafter referred to as C2B);
potrošniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini (v nadaljnjem besedilu: storitve C2X), ki obsegajo storitve standardne paketne pošte od potrošnika do potrošnika (v nadaljnjem besedilu: storitve C2C) in storitve standardne paketne pošte od potrošnika do podjetij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: storitve C2B);
domestic standard business parcel services (hereinafter referred to as B2X) which comprise business to business standard parcel services (hereinafter referred to as B2B) and business to consumer standard parcel services (hereinafter referred to as B2C);
podjetniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini (v nadaljnjem besedilu: storitve B2X), ki obsegajo medpodjetniške storitve standardne paketne pošte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: storitve B2B) in storitve standardne paketne pošte od podjetij do potrošnika (v nadaljnjem besedilu: storitve B2C);
domestic courier parcel services;
storitve kurirske paketne pošte v domovini;
contract logistics services.
pogodbene logistične storitve.
Magyar Posta provides the above services, with the exception of contract logistics and, to a certain extent, domestic pallet services, in the so-called Courier, Express and Parcel (CEP) sector of Hungary.
Družba Magyar Posta zagotavlja vse zgoraj navedene storitve, razen pogodbene logistike in do določenega obsega paletnih storitev v domovini, v tako imenovanem madžarskem sektorju kurirske, hitre in paketne pošte (CEP).
The CEP sector is a segment of the freight transport market and postal market, which provides time guaranteed services, whereby the service provider undertakes an obligation to the sender to deliver the item within a specified period or at a specific point in time.
Sektor CEP je del trga tovornega prometa in poštnega trga, kar je jamstvo za pravočasne storitve, pri čemer se ponudnik storitev obvezuje do pošiljatelja, da bo pošiljko dostavil v določenem obdobju ali ob določenem času.
Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which Directive 2004/17/EC applies shall not be subject to that Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Člen 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES določa, da se navedena direktiva ne uporablja za naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje opravljanja dejavnosti, za katere se uporablja Direktiva 2004/17/ES, če je dejavnost v državi članici, kjer se opravlja, neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
Access is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied the relevant EU legislation opening a given sector or a part of it.
Dostop se šteje za neomejenega, če država članica za odprtje zadevnega sektorja ali njegovega dela izvaja in uporablja ustrezno zakonodajo EU.
This legislation is listed in Annex XI to Directive 2004/17/EC, which, for the postal sector, refers to Directive 97/67/EC.
Ta zakonodaja je navedena v Prilogi XI k Direktivi 2004/17/ES, ki se za poštni sektor sklicuje na Direktivo 97/67/ES.
The application concerns postal services such as domestic standard consumer parcel services, domestic standard business parcel services, domestic express parcel services, domestic courier parcel services and also other services than postal services, namely those services referred to as domestic pallet services and contractual logistics.
Uporaba se nanaša na poštne storitve, kot so potrošniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini, podjetniške storitve standardne paketne pošte v domovini, storitve hitre paketne pošte v domovini, storitve kurirske paketne pošte v domovini, pa tudi druge storitve, ki niso poštne storitve, in sicer tiste, ki se navajajo kot paletne storitve in pogodbena logistika.
Hungary has implemented and applied Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC and Directive 2008/6/EC, using the possibility pursuant to Article 3(1) of the latter to reserve certain items of correspondence [3] until 31 December 2012 for the designated universal service provider, Magyar Posta [4].
Madžarska je pri izvajanju in uporabi Direktive 97/67/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2002/39/ES in Direktivo 2008/6/ES, uporabila možnost iz člena 3(1) zadnjenavedene direktive, da določene pošiljke korespondence [3] do 31. decembra 2012 rezervira za imenovanega izvajalca univerzalnih storitev, tj. družbo Magyar Posta [4].
None of the services concerned by the present request were reserved at the time of the request.
Storitve, na katere se nanaša ta zahtevek, ob njegovi predložitvi niso bile rezervirane.
As Hungary has reached the level of market opening provided for under the legislation listed in Annex XI to Directive 2004/17/EC, access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 30(3) of that Directive.
Ker je Madžarka dosegla stopnjo odprtosti trga, ki je določena v zakonodaji, navedeni v Prilogi XI k Direktivi 2004/17/ES, bi se moralo šteti, da dostop do trga ni omejen v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 30(3) navedene direktive.
Direct exposure to competition in a particular market should be evaluated on the basis of various criteria, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci na določenem trgu bi bilo treba oceniti na podlagi različnih meril, od katerih ni nobeno odločilno samo po sebi.
In respect of the markets concerned by this decision, the market share of the main players on a given market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account.
Eno merilo, ki bi ga bilo treba upoštevati v zvezi s trgi, na katere se nanaša ta sklep, je tržni delež glavnih akterjev na zadevnem trgu.
Another criterion is the degree of concentration on those markets.
Drugo merilo je stopnja koncentracije na navedenih trgih.
As the conditions vary for the different activities that are concerned by this Decision, the examination of the competitive situation should take into account the different situations on different markets.
Ker se pogoji za različne dejavnosti, na katere se nanaša ta sklep, med seboj razlikujejo, bi bilo treba pri preverjanju konkurenčnih razmer upoštevati različne razmere na različnih trgih.
In particular, the criteria and the methodology used to assess direct exposure to competition under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC are not necessarily identical to those used to perform an assessment under Article 101 or 102 TFEU or Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) [5].
Zlasti merila in metodologija, ki se uporabljajo za oceno neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci v skladu s členom 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES, niso nujno enaka tistim, ki se uporabljajo za oceno v skladu s členoma 101 in 102 PDEU ali Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o združitvah).
The Commission has held in previous decisions taken on the basis of the Merger Regulation [6] that the market for parcel delivery services can be segmented as follows:
Komisija je v prejšnjih odločitvah, ki jih je sprejela na podlagi uredbe o združitvah [6], menila, da je mogoče trg za storitve dostave paketne pošte razdeliti tako:
Express versus standard parcel delivery services.
Storitve dostave hitre paketne pošte proti storitvam dostave standardne paketne pošte.
This segmentation takes into account that express services are on the whole faster and more reliable than a standard service, that each of these services require a different infrastructure and that express services comprise additional value added service features and are also more expensive.
Pri tej razdelitvi se upošteva, da so storitve hitre pošte na splošno hitrejše in zanesljivejše od storitev standardne pošte, da je za vsako od teh storitev potrebna drugačna infrastruktura ter da storitve hitre pošte vključujejo dodatne značilnosti storitev z dodano vrednostjo in so tudi dražje.
Further distinction were also envisaged on the basis of type of customers and/or type of consignees:
Predvideno je bilo tudi nadaljnje razlikovanje na podlagi vrste stranke in/ali vrste prejemnika:
a distinction parcel delivery services for consumers versus parcel delivery (C2X) [7] for businesses (B2X);
razlikovanje med storitvami dostave paketne pošte za potrošnike in dostavo paketne pošte (C2X) [7] za podjetja (B2X);
within the B2X segment, a distinction between deliveries to businesses (B2B) and deliveries to consumers (B2C) since B2C delivery requires a denser network than B2B deliveries so that private consignees can be reached.International versus domestic delivery services.
v okviru segmenta B2X je treba razlikovati med dostavo podjetjem (B2B) in dostavo potrošnikom (B2C), saj je za dostavo B2C potrebna gostejša mreža kot za dostave B2B, da se lahko dosežejo zasebni prejemniki.Mednarodne storitve dostave proti storitvam dostave v domovini.
In a recent decision [8], the Commission also distinguished international intra-EEA services and international extra-EEA services.(10) The applicant takes the view that the relevant product markets for parcel delivery services are those listed in recital 2 above.
Komisija je v nedavni odločitvi [8] prav tako razlikovala med mednarodnimi storitvami znotraj EGP in tistimi zunaj njega.(10) Prosilec meni, da so upoštevni proizvodni trgi za storitve dostave paketne pošte tisti, ki so navedeni v uvodni izjavi 2 zgoraj.
This approach is generally in line with Commission previous practice.
Ta pristop je na splošno v skladu s prejšnjo prakso Komisije.
Nevertheless, the applicant assessed the domestic B2X market as a whole (i.e. without distinguishing the B2B and B2C segments) which may not be fully in line with previous Commission practice [9].
Kljub temu je prosilec trg B2X v domovini ocenil kot celoto (tj. brez razlikovanja segmentov B2B in B2C), kar morda ni popolnoma v skladu s prejšnjo prakso Komisije [9].
The applicant argues that Magyar Posta does not differentiate between B2B and B2C services in terms of available prices, and that it does not distinguish the services on the basis of addressee groups.
Prosilec trdi, da družba Magyar Posta ne razlikuje med storitvami B2B in B2C glede razpoložljivih cen ter da ne razlikuje storitev na podlagi skupin naročnikov.
This argument is held up also by the Hungarian Authorities [10], which in addition points out that according to the information available on websites of the main competitors of Magyar Posta, on the B2X standard post parcels, there is no distinction made in terms of published prices, as to whether parcel recipients are consumers or businesses.
To trditev zagovarjajo tudi madžarski organi [10], ki poleg tega izpostavljajo, da glede na informacije o standardni paketni pošti B2X, ki so na voljo na spletnih mestih glavnih konkurentov družbe Magyar Posta, pri objavljenih cenah ni razlikovanja glede tega, ali so prejemniki paketov potrošniki ali podjetja.
Previous Decisions [11] under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC, concerning post parcels made a distinction between B2B and B2C standard post parcels.
V prejšnjem sklepu in odločbah [11] v skladu s členom 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES, ki se nanašajo na paketno pošto, se je razlikovalo med standardno paketno pošto B2B in B2C.
However, in all cases the result of the assessment for both markets was the same, which may be seen as an indication of the fact that the product market definition could have been left open.
Rezultati ocene za oba trga pa so bili v vseh primerih enaki, kar je lahko znak, da bi lahko opredelitev proizvodnega trga ostala odprta.
Moreover, it appears from the information provided by the National Regulatory Authority [12], that in both scenarios (if two separate markets are considered for B2B and B2C standard post parcels, or only one market for B2X standard post parcels) the result of the assessment of the competitive situation would be the same.
Poleg tega je iz informacij, ki jih je zagotovil nacionalni regulativni organ [12], razvidno, da bi bil rezultat ocene konkurenčnih razmer enak v obeh primerih (če se za standardno paketno pošto B2B in B2C upoštevata ločena trga ali če se za standardno paketno pošto B2X upošteva samo eden).
Based on the information on recitals 9 to 13, for the purposes of the assessment under this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, it can be considered that the relevant product market is B2X, while the precise definition of the relevant market can be left open as the result of the analysis remains the same whether it is based on a narrow or a broader definition.
Na podlagi informacij iz uvodnih izjav 9 do 13 se lahko za oceno iz tega sklepa in brez poseganja v konkurenčno pravo šteje, da upoštevni proizvodni trg pomeni trg B2X, medtem ko lahko natančna opredelitev upoštevnega trga ostane odprta, saj rezultat analize ostaja nespremenjen ne glede na to, ali temelji na ožji ali širši opredelitvi.
Previous Commission Decisions under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC [13] considered the express and courier parcels services as one product market.
Storitve hitre in kurirske paketne pošte se v prejšnjih odločbah Komisije v skladu s členom 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES [13] štejejo za en proizvodni trg.
The applicant assumes that express and courier parcels services form part of different markets.
Prosilec domneva, da so storitve hitre in kurirske paketne pošte del drugih trgov.
For the purposes of the assessment under this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, it can be considered that the relevant product markets are express parcel services and courier parcel services, while the precise definition of the relevant market can be left open as the result of the analysis remains the same whether it is based on a narrow or a broader definition.
Za oceno iz tega sklepa in brez poseganja v konkurenčno pravo se lahko šteje, da upoštevna proizvodna trga pomenita storitve hitre in storitve kurirske pošte, medtem ko lahko natančna opredelitev upoštevnega trga ostane odprta, saj rezultat analize ostaja nespremenjen ne glede na to, ali temelji na ožji ali širši opredelitvi.
Domestic pallet services are part of the so-called freight forwarding markets, which have also been assessed in previous Decisions under the Merger Regulation.
Paletne storitve v domovini so del tako imenovanih špediterskih trgov in so bile že ocenjene v prejšnjih odločbah v skladu z uredbo o združitvah.
The Commission assessed further possible distinctions [18] (i.e. between domestic and cross border services, by reference to the types of goods handled or the industry serviced, or between lead logistics providers and traditional contract logistics service providers) but in the end the precise scope of the product market definition was left open [19].
Komisija je ocenila nadaljnje možno razlikovanje [18] (tj. med storitvami v domovini in čezmejnimi storitvami glede na vrste blaga, ki se uporablja, ali industrijo, v kateri se izvajajo storitve, ali med vodilnimi ponudniki logističnih storitev in tradicionalnimi ponudniki pogodbenih logističnih storitev), vendar je natančen obseg opredelitve proizvodnega trga na koncu ostal odprt [19].
The applicant follows also the Commission’s position.
Prosilec prav tako upošteva mnenje Komisije.
In the present case, given that there are no indications that further distinction is needed, for the purposes of this decision and without prejudice to competition law, the product market is defined as contract logistics.
Proizvodni trg je za ta primer, ob upoštevanju, da ni nikakršnih znakov, ki bi kazali na potrebo po nadaljnjem razlikovanju, v tem sklepu in brez poseganja v konkurenčno pravo opredeljen kot pogodbena logistika.
In conclusion, taking due account the above, for the purposes of this Decision, and without prejudice to competition law relevant product markets shall be those listed in recital 2.
Nazadnje, ob ustreznem upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega, so v tem sklepu in brez poseganja v konkurenčno pravo upoštevni proizvodni trgi tisti, ki so navedeni v uvodni izjavi 2.
Relevant geographical market
Upoštevni geografski trg
In its practice [20], the Commission has taken the view that the markets for domestic parcel delivery services and any segments thereof are national in scope.
Komisija je v svoji praksi [20] zavzela stališče, da so trgi za storitve dostave paketne pošte v domovini in kakršni koli segmenti, ki izhajajo iz tega, po obsegu nacionalni.
This segmentation is mainly based on the fact that such services are provided at national level.
Ta razdelitev v glavnem temelji na dejstvu, da se takšne storitve zagotavljajo na nacionalni ravni.
The applicant’s position is in line with Commission practice.
Mnenje prosilca je v skladu s prakso Komisije.