natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That investigation was concluded by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2010 [3], through which the Council extended the definitive anti-dumping duty against certain steel ropes and cables originating in the People’s Republic in China (PRC) to imports of the same product consigned from the Republic of Korea (‘the extended measures’).
Navedena preiskava je bila zaključena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 400/2010 [3], s katero je Svet razširil dokončno protidampinško dajatev za določene jeklene vrvi in kable s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (LRK) na uvoz enakih izdelkov, poslanih iz Republike Koreje („razširjeni ukrepi“).
By the same Regulation, imports of the product concerned consigned by certain specifically mentioned Korean companies were excluded from these measures as the companies concerned were not found to be circumventing the measures.
Ista uredba iz ukrepov izključuje uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki so ga poslale nekatere posebej navedene korejske družbe, saj za njih ni bilo ugotovljeno, da se izogibajo ukrepom.
Moreover, even though some of the Korean companies concerned were related to PRC companies that are subject to the original measures, there was no evidence that such relationship was established or used to circumvent the measures in place on imports originating in the PRC [4].
Poleg tega, čeprav so nekatere zadevne korejske družbe povezane z družbami iz LRK, za katere veljajo prvotni ukrepi, ni bilo dokazov, da je bil tak odnos vzpostavljen ali uporabljen za izogibanje ukrepom, vzpostavljenih za uvoz s poreklom iz LRK [4].
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 [5] and following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council maintained these measures.
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 102/2012 [5] in po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe ukrepe ohranil.
B. INITIATION OF A REVIEW
B. ZAČETEK PREGLEDA
By Regulation (EU) No 969/2011 [6], the Commission opened a review of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2010 for the purpose of determining the possibility of granting an exemption from those measures to one Korean exporter, Seil Wire & Cable (‘the applicant’), repealed the anti-dumping duty with regard to imports from the applicant and made imports from it subject to registration.
Z Uredbo (EU) št. 969/2011 [6] je Komisija začela pregled Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 400/2010, da se ugotovi, ali se za določenega korejskega izvoznika, Seil Wire & Cable („vložnik“), lahko odobri izvzetje iz navedenih ukrepov, odpravijo protidampinške dajatve pri njegovem uvozu in uvede registracija njegovega uvoza.
The review was opened as the Commission considered that there was sufficient prima facie evidence for the applicant’s allegations that it was a new exporting producer according to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation and that it could meet the criteria for being granted an exemption to the extension of the measures as per Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
Pregled se je začel, ker je Komisija ocenila, da obstaja dovolj prima facie dokazov za trditve vložnika, da je v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe nov proizvajalec izvoznik in da izpolnjuje merila za odobritev izvzetja iz razširjenih ukrepov v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
An examination has therefore been carried out to determine whether the applicant fulfils the criteria for being granted an exemption to the extended measures as set out in recitals 5 to 7 of Regulation (EU) No 969/2011, by verifying that:
Za ugotovitev, ali vložnik izpolnjuje merila za odobritev izvzetja iz razširjenih ukrepov, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 5 do 7 Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 969/2011, je bilo s preiskavo preverjeno, da:
it did not export the product concerned to the European Union during the investigation period used in the investigation that led to the extended measures, i.e. 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009;
v obdobju preiskave, to je od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009, uporabljenem v preiskavi, ki je privedla do razširjenih ukrepov, zadevnega izdelka ni izvažal v Evropsko unijo;
it has not circumvented the measures applicable to certain steel ropes and cables of PRC origin; and
se ni izogibal ukrepom, ki se uporabljajo za nekatere jeklene vrvi in kable s poreklom iz LRK, ter
it began exporting the product concerned to the European Union after the end of the investigation period used in the investigation that led to the extended measures.
je začel izvažati zadevni izdelek v Evropsko unijo po koncu obdobja preiskave, uporabljenega v preiskavi, ki je privedla do razširjenih ukrepov.
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of the determination of the fulfilment of the above criteria.
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse informacije, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za ugotovitev izpolnjevanja navedenih meril.
This process included an on-spot verification at the premises of the applicant.
Ta postopek je vključeval preveritveni obisk v prostorih vložnika.
C. FINDINGS
C. UGOTOVITVE
The applicant provided sufficient evidence to prove that it meets all the three criteria mentioned at recital 6 above.
Vložnik je predložil zadostne dokaze o izpolnjevanju vseh treh meril iz uvodne izjave 6.
D. MODIFICATION OF THE LIST OF COMPANIES BENEFITING FROM AN EXEMPTION TO THE EXTENDED MEASURES
D. SPREMEMBA SEZNAMA DRUŽB, KI SO UPRAVIČENE DO IZVZETJA IZ RAZŠIRJENIH UKREPOV
In consideration of the findings of the investigation as indicated in recital 8 above, it is concluded that the company Seil Wire & Cable should be added to the list of companies which are exempted from the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 on imports of certain steel ropes and cables originating in the People’s Republic of China as extended to imports of certain steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea.
Ob upoštevanju ugotovitev iz preiskave, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 8 zgoraj, se ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba družbo Seil Wire & Cable dodati na seznam družb, ki so izvzete iz dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 102/2012 na uvoz določenih jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz nekaterih jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Republike Koreje.
Therefore, Seil Wire & Cable should be added to the list of individually mentioned companies under Article 1(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012.
Zato je Seil Wire & Cable treba dodati seznamu posamično navedenih družb, ki so v skladu s členom 1(4) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 102/2012.
As stipulated in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2010, the application of the exemption shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
Kot je določeno v členu 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 400/2010, je izvzetje pogojeno s tem, da se carinskim organom držav članic predloži veljaven trgovinski račun, ki je skladen z zahtevami iz Priloge k navedeni uredbi.
If no such invoice is presented, the anti-dumping duty should continue to apply.
Če tak račun ni predložen, se protidampinška dajatev uporablja še naprej.
The applicant and the Union Industry have been informed of the findings of the investigation and have had the opportunity to submit their comments.
Vložnik in industrija Unije sta bila seznanjena z ugotovitvami preiskave in sta imela možnost predložiti pripombe.
Their comments were taken into account where appropriate,
Njune pripombe so bile upoštevane, kadar je bilo to primerno –
The table in Article 1(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 102/2012 shall be replaced by the following table:
Razpredelnica iz člena 1(4) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 102/2012 se nadomesti z naslednjo razpredelnico:
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports established in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 969/2011.
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza, določeno v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 969/2011.
No anti-dumping duty shall be collected on the imports thus registered.
Za tako registriran uvoz se protidampinška dajatev ne pobira.
See recital 80 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2010.
Glej uvodno izjavo 80 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 400/2010.
OJ L 36, 9.2.2012, p. 1.
UL L 36, 9.2.2012, str. 1.
OJ L 254, 30.9.2011, p. 7.
UL L 254, 30.9.2011, str. 7.
Indeed, it could prove that: (i) it did not export to the Union the product concerned during the period 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009; (ii) it has not circumvented the measures applicable to certain steel ropes and cables of PRC origin; and (iii) it began exporting the product concerned to the European Union after 30 June 2009.
Dejansko je dokazal, da: (i) zadevnega izdelka v obdobju od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 ni izvažal v Unijo, (ii) se ni izogibal ukrepom, ki se uporabljajo za določene jeklene vrvi in kable s poreklom iz LRK, in (iii) je zadevni izdelek v Evropsko unijo začel izvažati po 30. juniju 2009.
Therefore, an exemption should be granted to the company concerned.
Zadevnemu podjetju bi zato bilo treba dodeliti izvzetje iz razširjenih ukrepov.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 559/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 559/2012
terminating the partial interim review concerning the countervailing measures on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in, inter alia, India
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda izravnalnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 19 and 24 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), ter zlasti členov 19 in 24 Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 [2], the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating, inter alia, in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2603/2000 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
The definitive findings and conclusions of an accelerated review pursuant to Article 20 of the basic Regulation are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1645/2005 [3].
Dokončne ugotovitve in sklepi pospešenega pregleda v skladu s členom 20 osnovne uredbe so navedeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1645/2005 [3].
Following an expiry review, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 193/2007 [4], imposed a definitive countervailing duty for a further period of five years.
Svet je po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa z Uredbo (ES) št. 193/2007 [4] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev za dodatno obdobje petih let.
The countervailing measures were amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1286/2008 [5] following a partial interim review (‘the last review investigation’).
Izravnalni ukrepi so bili spremenjeni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1286/2008 [5] po delnem vmesnem pregledu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadnja preiskava v zvezi s pregledom).
The countervailing measures consist of a specific duty.
Izravnalni ukrepi vključujejo posebno dajatev.
The rate of the duty is between EUR 0 and EUR 106,5 per tonne for individually named Indian producers with a residual duty rate of EUR 69,4 per tonne imposed on imports from all other producers.
Stopnja dajatve se giblje med 0 EUR in 106,5 EUR/tono za poimensko navedene indijske proizvajalce s stopnjo preostale dajatve 69,4 EUR/tono, uvedene na uvoz vseh drugih proizvajalcev.
Following a name change of one Indian company, South Asian Petrochem Ltd, by Notice 2010/C 335/07 [6], the Commission concluded that the anti-subsidy findings in respect of South Asian Petrochem Ltd should apply to Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited.
Po spremembi imena ene indijske družbe South Asian Petrochem Ltd je Komisija z Obvestilom 2010/C 335/07 [6] sklenila, da bi se protisubvencijske ugotovitve v zvezi s South Asian Petrochem Ltd morale uporabljati za Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited.
By Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 [7], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of PET originating, inter alia, in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2604/2000 [7] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz PET s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
A review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 [8] (‘the basic anti-dumping Regulation’) concerning South Asian Petrochem Ltd was subsequently conducted and its definitive findings and conclusions are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1646/2005 [9].
V skladu s členom 11(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 [8] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna protidampinška uredba) je bil opravljen pregled v zvezi s South Asian Petrochem Ltd, katerega dokončne ugotovitve in sklepi so določeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1646/2005 [9].
Following an expiry review, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 [10], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty for a further period of five years.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 192/2007 [10] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev za dodatno obdobje petih let.
The anti-dumping measures were amended by Regulation (EC) No 1286/2008 following a partial interim review investigation.
Protidampinški ukrepi so bili spremenjeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1286/2008 po preiskavi v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom.
The measures were set at the level of the injury elimination and consisted of specific anti-dumping duties.
Ukrepi so bili določeni na ravni odprave škode in so vključevali posebne protidampinške dajatve.
The rate of the duty is between EUR 87,5 and EUR 200,9 per tonne for individually named Indian producers with a residual duty rate of EUR 153,6 per tonne imposed on imports from all other producers (‘the current anti-dumping measures’).
Stopnja dajatve je med 87,5 EUR in 200,9 EUR/tono za poimensko navedene indijske proizvajalce s stopnjo preostale dajatve 153,6 EUR/tono, uvedene na uvoz vseh drugih proizvajalcev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: trenutni protidampinški ukrepi).
Following a name change of one Indian company, South Asian Petrochem Ltd, by Notice 2010/C 335/06 [11], the Commission concluded that the anti-dumping findings in respect of South Asian Petrochem Ltd should apply to Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited.
Po spremembi imena ene indijske družbe, South Asian Petrochem Ltd, je Komisija z Obvestilom 2010/C 335/06 [11] sklenila, da bi se protidampinške ugotovitve v zvezi s South Asian Petrochem Ltd morale uporabljati za Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited.
By Decision 2005/697/EC [12], the Commission accepted undertakings offered by South Asian Petrochem Ltd setting a minimum import price (‘the undertaking’).
Komisija je s Sklepom 2005/697/ES [12] sprejela ponudbe o zavezi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zaveza) South Asian Petrochem Ltd, v katerih je bila določena minimalna uvozna cena.
Following a name change, the Commission concluded by Notice 2010/C 335/05 [13] that the undertaking offered by South Asian Petrochem Ltd should apply to Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited.
Po spremembi imena je Komisija z Obvestilom 2010/C 335/05 [13] sklenila, da bi se zaveza, ki jo je ponudila South Asian Petrochem Ltd, morala uporabljati za Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited.
A request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation was lodged by Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited, an Indian exporting producer of PET (‘the applicant’).
Zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled je v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe vložila Dhunseri Petrochem & Tea Limited, indijski proizvajalec izvoznik PET (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik).
The request was limited in scope to subsidisation and to the applicant.
Zahtevek je bil po obsegu omejen na preiskavo subvencioniranja in vložnika.
The applicant at the same time also requested the review of the current anti-dumping measures.
Vložnik je hkrati zahteval tudi pregled trenutnih protidampinških ukrepov.
The residual anti-dumping and countervailing duties are applicable to imports of products produced by the applicant and sales of the applicant to the Union are covered by the undertaking.
Preostale protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve veljajo za uvoz izdelkov, ki jih je proizvedel vložnik, vložnikovo prodajo v Unijo pa zajema zaveza.
The applicant provided prima facie evidence that the continued application of the measure at its current level was no longer necessary to offset the countervailable subsidisation.
Vložnik je predložil dokaze prima facie, da nadaljevanje ukrepa na sedanji ravni ni več potrebno za preprečevanje subvencioniranja, proti kateremu se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
In particular, the applicant provided prima facie evidence showing that its subsidy amount has decreased well below the duty rate currently applicable to it.
Vložnik je zlasti predložil dokaze prima facie, ki kažejo, da se je njegov znesek subvencije zmanjšal precej pod stopnjo dajatve, ki se trenutno uporablja zanj.
This reduction in the overall subsidy level would mainly be due to the termination of its export oriented unit (EOU) status.
Do tega zmanjšanja splošne ravni subvencije je prišlo zlasti zaradi izteka njegovega statusa izvozno usmerjene enote (EOU).
With a magnitude of 13,5 %, the EOU scheme accounted for the vast majority of the 13,9 % subsidies established during the accelerated review.
Shema EOU je z obsegom 13,5 % predstavljala veliko večino subvencij v višini 13,9 %, ki so bile ugotovljene med pospešenim pregledom.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that the request contained sufficient prima facie evidence, the Commission announced on 2 April 2011 the initiation of a partial interim review (‘the present review’) pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation by Notice 2011/C 102/08 [14].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da je zahtevek vseboval zadostne dokaze prima facie, in 2. aprila 2011 z Obvestilom 2011/C 102/08 [14] napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sedanji pregled) v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
The review was limited in scope to the examination of subsidisation in respect of the applicant.
Pregled je bil po obsegu omejen na preučitev subvencioniranja v zvezi z vložnikom.
The Commission officially informed the applicant, the representatives of the exporting country and the association of Union producers about the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda uradno obvestila vložnika, predstavnike države izvoznice in združenje proizvajalcev Unije.
One interested party requested and was granted a hearing.
Ena zainteresirana stran je zahtevala zaslišanje, ki ji je bilo odobreno.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent a questionnaire to the applicant and the Government of India (GOI) and received replies within the deadline set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku in vladi Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: VI) poslala vprašalnik, da bi dobila informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za njeno preiskavo, ta pa sta izpolnjena vprašalnika vrnila v predpisanem roku.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of subsidisation.
Komisija je zahtevala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev subvencioniranja.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the applicant in Kolkata, India and at the premises of the GOI in New Delhi (Directorate-General of Foreign Trade and Ministry of Commerce) and Kolkata (Commerce & Industries Department, Government of West Bengal).
Komisija je opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih vložnika v Kalkuti v Indiji ter v prostorih VI v New Delhiju (generalni direktorat za zunanjo trgovino in ministrstvo za trgovino) in Kalkuti (ministrstvo za trgovino in industrijo vlade Zahodne Bengalije).
The investigation of subsidisation covered the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava subvencioniranja je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2010 do 31. marca 2011 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP).
On 2 April 2011 by Notice 2011/C 102/09 [15] the Commission announced the initiation of a partial interim review of the current anti-dumping measures pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, limited in scope to the examination of dumping in respect of the applicant.
Komisija je 2. aprila 2011 z Obvestilom 2011/C 102/09 [15] napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda trenutnih protidampinških ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne protidampinške uredbe, ki je po obsegu omejen na preiskavo dampinga v zvezi z vložnikom.
In the parallel anti-dumping investigation it was found that the changes are not of a lasting nature.
V vzporedni protidampinški preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da spremembe niso trajne narave.
As a consequence, the review investigation was terminated without amending the measures in force.
Zato se je preiskava v zvezi s pregledom zaključila brez spremembe veljavnih ukrepov.
The product under review is PET having a viscosity of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, currently falling within CN code 39076020 and originating in India (‘the product concerned’).
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je PET z viskoznostjo 78 ml/g ali več, v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN 39076020 in je s poreklom iz Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek).
The investigation revealed that the product concerned produced in India and sold to the Union is identical in terms of physical and chemical characteristics and uses to the product produced and sold on the domestic market in India.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je zadevni izdelek, proizveden v Indiji in prodan v Unijo, po fizikalnih in kemičnih lastnostih ter uporabi enak izdelku, proizvedenemu in prodanemu na domačem trgu v Indiji.
It is therefore concluded that products sold on the domestic and export markets are like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se sklene, da so izdelki, prodani na domačem trgu in izvoznih trgih, podobni izdelki v smislu člena 2(c) osnovne uredbe.
On the basis of the information submitted by the GOI and the applicant and the replies to the Commission’s questionnaire, the following schemes, which allegedly involve the granting of subsidies, were investigated:
Na podlagi informacij, ki sta jih predložila VI in vložnik, ter izpolnjenih vprašalnikov Komisije so bile preiskane naslednje sheme, ki domnevno vključujejo dodeljevanje subvencij:
Nationwide schemes:
Državne sheme:
Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme (DEPBS);
„Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme“ – shema za preložitev plačila uvoznih dajatev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: DEPBS);
Export oriented units (EOU)/export processing zones (EPZ)/special economic zones (SEZ);
„Export Oriented Units“ – izvozno usmerjene enote (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EOU)/„Export Processing Zones“ – cone izvozne proizvodnje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EPZ)/„Special Economic Zones“ – posebne ekonomske cone (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SEZ);
Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCGS);
„Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme“ – shema za podporo izvozu investicijskega blaga (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EPCGS);
Focus Market Scheme (FMS);
„Focus Market Scheme“ – shema usmeritve v trg (v nadaljnjem besedilu: FMS);
Export Credit Scheme (ECS);
„Export Credit Scheme“ – shema izvoznih kreditov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ECS);
Income Tax Exemption Scheme (ITES).
„Income Tax Exemption Scheme“ – shema oprostitve davka od dohodka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ITES).
Regional schemes:
Regionalne sheme:
West Bengal Incentive Scheme (WBIS).
„West Bengal Incentive Scheme“ – shema spodbud Zahodne Bengalije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: WBIS).