natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission notes that the non-confidential version of the initial undertaking offer was included in the file open for inspection by interested parties directly upon its receipt as foreseen in Article 8(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila nezaupna različica prvotne ponujene zaveze takoj po prejemu vključena v spis, ki je bil na voljo zainteresiranim stranem za pregled, kot določa člen 8(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe.
MIPs and annual level are subject to professional secrecy pursuant to Article 339 of the Treaty and confidential according to Articles 19 of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 29 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Za minimalne uvozne cene in letno raven velja obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti v skladu s členom 339 Pogodbe, v skladu s členom 19 osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 29 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe pa so zaupne.
Therefore, in line with the Commission's practice, they are not disclosed to third parties.
Zato se v skladu s prakso Komisije ne razkrijejo tretjim osebam.
In the current case, upon parties' requests, the Commission requested CCCME whether some more information related to MIP and annual level could be disclosed.
V tej zadevi se je Komisija na zahtevo strani pozanimala pri CCCME, ali je mogoče razkriti nekatere dodatne informacije v zvezi z minimalnimi uvoznimi cenami in letno ravnjo.
CCCME agreed to disclose an approximation of the MIP (defined as ‘below’ a specific value).
CCCME se je strinjala, da bo razkrila približek minimalnih uvoznih cen (opredeljen kot „pod“ določeno vrednostjo).
Interested parties could consult that information on the non-confidential file.
Zainteresirane strani so imele dostop do teh informacij v nezaupnem spisu.
The Commission considers that such information, in this specific case, strikes an appropriate balance between the requirements of confidentiality and right of defence.
Komisija meni, da gre v tem primeru pri teh informacijah za ustrezno ravnovesje med zahtevami glede zaupnosti in pravico do obrambe.
The Commission has also considered the requests relating to different terms of the undertaking.
Komisija je upoštevala tudi zahteve, ki se nanašajo na različne pogoje zaveze.
It has come to the conclusion that by revealing the information requested, it would increase the risk of price manipulation and gaming on the market for solar panels.
Zaključila je, da bi se z razkritjem zahtevanih informacij povečala nevarnost manipulacije s cenami in hazardiranja na trgu za solarne panele.
In order not to unduly distort the functioning of the market for solar panels, the Commission considers that the information requested should not be available to buyers and competitors of the companies that have offered the undertaking.
Da se ne bi po nepotrebnem izkrivljalo delovanje trga za solarne panele, po mnenju Komisije zahtevane informacije ne bi smele biti na razpolago kupcem in konkurentom podjetij, ki so ponudila zavezo.
Those considerations apply as well to MIP and annual level, which should not be disclosed at a greater level of detail.
Ti pomisleki veljajo tudi za minimalne uvozne cene in letno raven, ki ne smejo biti razkrite v večjih podrobnostih.
One interested party requested the Commission to allow for a transition period (and exemption from anti-dumping duties) when goods were ordered prior to the entry into force of the undertaking but presented for customs clearance after that date without an undertaking invoice.
Ena od zainteresiranih strani je zahtevala, da Komisija določi prehodno obdobje (in oprostitev protidampinških dajatev), če je bilo blago naročeno pred začetkom veljavnosti zaveze, za carinjenje pa predloženo po tem datumu brez računa na podlagi zaveze.
In order to be exempted from anti-dumping duties, goods presented for customs clearance have to fulfil the conditions set out in the Regulation (EU) No 748/2013.
Da bi bilo izvzeto iz protidampinške dajatve mora blago, predloženo za carinjenje, izpolnjevati pogoje iz Uredbe (EU) št. 748/2013.
The argument therefore has to be rejected.
Argument je treba zato zavrniti.
Evaluation of the undertaking offer as amended
Ocena ponujene zaveze, kot je bila spremenjena
The Commission evaluated the undertaking offer as amended.
Komisija je ocenila ponujeno zavezo, kot je bila spremenjena.
First, it noted that the technical revision of the undertaking is necessary to reflect the definitive findings of the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations (i.e. the exclusion of wafers from the scope of the investigation).
Prvič, ugotovila je, da je potrebna tehnična revizija zaveze, da se bodo upoštevale dokončne ugotovitve protidampinške in protisubvencijske preiskave (tj. izključitev rezin iz preiskave).
Second, the Commission concluded that, based on the investigation period data, the trade volume of the additional companies in total Chinese exports to the EU is very limited and thus does not change the Commission's provisional assessment that the undertaking removes the injurious effect of dumping, with the MIP and within the annual level as initially offered.
Drugič, na podlagi podatkov iz obdobja preiskave je Komisija tudi ugotovila, da je obseg trgovine dodatnih družb v celotnem izvozu iz Kitajske v EU zelo omejen in zato ne spreminja začasne ocene Komisije, da zaveza odpravlja škodljivi učinek dampinga pri takih minimalnih uvoznih cenah in letni ravni, kot so bile ponujene sprva.
The Commission also assessed whether the inclusion of the additional exporting producers would be likely to jeopardize the effective monitoring of the undertaking or to increase the risk of circumvention.
Komisija je tudi ocenila, ali bi vključitev dodatnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ogrozila učinkovito spremljanje zaveze ali povečala tveganje izogibanja.
In this context, the Commission noted that the CCCME demonstrated its active role in the practical implementation of the undertaking.
V zvezi s tem je ugotovila, da je zadruga dokazala svojo aktivno vlogo pri praktičnem izvajanju zaveze.
In addition, the inclusion of the additional exporting producers will not change the terms of the undertaking.
Poleg tega vključitev dodatnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ne bo spremenila pogojev zaveze.
Therefore, the Commission concluded that the inclusion of the additional producers does not alter its initial findings on the effective monitoring of the undertaking and on the limited risk of circumvention.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da vključitev dodatnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ne spreminja njenih prvotnih ugotovitev o učinkovitem spremljanju zaveze in omejenem tveganju izogibanja.
Third, anti-subsidy and anti-dumping investigations were carried out in parallel in the current case.
Tretjič, v tej zadevi sta bili protisubvencijska in protidampinška preiskava izvedeni vzporedno.
As per the lesser duty a rule, a definitive countervailing duty rate was set at the level of the subsidy margin and a definitive anti-dumping duty at the injury elimination level.
V skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve je bila stopnja dokončne izravnalne dajatve določena na ravni stopnje subvencije, dokončna protidampinška dajatev pa na ravni stopnje odprave škode.
Hence, the combined anti-dumping and countervailing duty rate will be equal to the injury elimination level (countervailing duty topped-up with anti-dumping duty up to injury elimination level).
Zato bo združena stopnja protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve ustrezala stopnji odprave škode (izravnalna dajatev, ki se ji doda protidampinška dajatev do stopnje odprave škode).
Therefore, the Commission concluded that the undertaking still removes the injurious effects of both dumping and subsidization, thereby no change to the MIP is needed.
Zato je Komisija zaključila, da zaveza še vedno odpravlja škodljivi učinek dampinga in subvencioniranja, zato sprememba minimalnih uvoznih cen ni potrebna.
Fourth, one party contested the fact that the Commission had relied in Decision 2013/423/EU on post-IP data in order to assess whether the undertaking removed the injurious effect of dumping, relying on Article 6(1) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 11(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Ena od strani je oporekala dejstvu, da se je Komisija pri Sklepu 2013/423/EU oprla na podatke iz obdobja po obdobju preiskave, da bi ocenila, ali zaveza odpravlja škodljivi učinek dampinga, pri čemer se je oprla na člen 6(1) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in člen 11(1) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
Article 6(1) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation stipulates that ‘information relating to a period subsequent to the investigation period shall, normally [emphasis added], not be taken into account.’ Similar wording can be found in Article 11(1) last sentence of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Člen 6(1) osnovne protidampinške uredbe določa, da se informacije, ki se nanašajo na obdobje, ki sledi obdobju preiskave, običajno ne upoštevajo [poudarek dodan]. Podobno določa zadnji stavek člena 11(1) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
Recital 3 of Decision 2013/423/EU sets out the circumstances which led the Commission to rely on post-IP data in the present case.
Uvodna izjava 3 Sklepa 2013/423/EU opredeljuje okoliščine, zaradi katerih se je Komisija v tej zadevi oprla na podatke iz obdobja po obdobju preiskave.
The party has not contested the factual accurateness of those circumstances.
Stran ni nasprotovala točnosti teh okoliščin.
The argument is therefore rejected.
Zato se ta argument zavrne.
Fifth, the undertaking ensures stability of supply for the Union at a sustainable price level.
Petič, zaveza zagotavlja Uniji stabilnost dobave ob vzdržnih cenah.
Therefore, there are no reasons of general policy for not accepting the undertaking.
Zato ni razlogov splošne politike, da zaveze ne bi sprejeli.
One party has considered that the MIP is set too high, one party has considered that it is set too low.
Ena od strank je menila, da so minimalne uvozne cene določene previsoko, ena od strank pa, da so določene prenizko.
As set out in recital 7 of Decision 2013/423/EU, in order to assess whether that price undertaking removes the injurious effect of dumping, the Commission has analysed, inter alia, the current export prices and the level of provisional duty.
Da bi se ocenilo, ali bo navedena cenovna zaveza odpravila škodljivi učinek dampinga, je Komisija med drugim analizirala sedanje izvozne cene in stopnjo začasne dajatve, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 7 Sklepa 2013/423/EU.
After having analysed the additional information provided by parties, the information available on the current and expected evolution of production costs, and price developments since the adoption of Decision 2013/423/EU, the Commission confirms the finding in recital 7 of Decision 2013/423/EU.
Po analizi dodatnih informacij, ki so jih zagotovile strani, informacij, ki so na voljo o trenutnem in pričakovanem razvoju proizvodnih stroškov, ter razvoja cen od sprejetja Sklepa 2013/423/EU, Komisija potrjuje ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 7 Sklepa 2013/423/EU.
In the absence of other comments, the findings in recitals 3 to 9 of Decision 2013/423/EU, as complemented by the findings set out above in recitals 16 to 22 are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 3 do 9 Sklepa 2013/423/EU, kot jih dopolnjujejo ugotovitve iz zgornjih uvodnih izjav 16 do 22, potrdijo.
Changes in companies' names and changes to the list of related companies in the EU
Spremembe imen družb in spremembe seznama povezanih družb v EU
The inclusion of new companies in the undertaking triggers changes to the list of related companies in the EU as submitted in the initial undertaking offer.
Vključitev novih družb v zavezo pomeni spremembe seznama povezanih družb v EU, kot je bil predložen ob prvotno ponujeni zavezi.
In addition, one exporting producer requested inclusion of a new related company in the EU to replace another company.
Poleg tega je eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov zahteval vključitev nove povezane družbe v EU, ki bi nadomestila drugo družbo.
Finally, one company changed its name.
Ena od družb je spremenila ime.
C. ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AS AMENDED
C. SPREJETJE ZAVEZE, KOT JE BILA SPREMENJENA
In the view of the above, the undertaking as amended is acceptable.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je zaveza, kot je bila spremenjena, sprejemljiva.
Interested parties have been informed of the essential facts, considerations and obligations upon which the acceptance is based.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih, razmislekih in obveznostih, na katerih je temeljilo sprejetje.
The Commission did not receive any comments.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb –
The undertaking offered by the exporting producers listed in the Annex of this Decision together with the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME), in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China, is hereby accepted.
Zaveza, ki so jo ponudili proizvajalci izvozniki iz Priloge k temu sklepu in kitajska gospodarska zbornica za izvoz in uvoz strojev in elektronskih izdelkov (CCCME) v okviru protidampinškega in protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, se sprejme.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 26.
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 26.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 1.
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 1.
OJ C 340, 8.11.2012, p. 13.
UL C 340, 8.11.2012, str. 13.
Decision No 1312/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep št. 1312/2013/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
of 11 December 2013
z dne 11. december 2013
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 173(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 173(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 294/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1],
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 requires the Commission to submit a proposal for the first Strategic Innovation Agenda ("the SIA"), on the basis of the draft provided by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology ("the EIT").
Uredba (ES) št. 294/2008 zahteva, da Komisija predloži predlog prvega strateškega inovacijskega programa (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SIP) na podlagi osnutka, ki ga pripravi Evropski inštitut za inovacije in tehnologijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EIT).
The SIA should define the priority fields and the long-term strategy of the EIT and include an assessment of its economic impact and capacity to generate best innovation added-value.
V SIP bi bilo treba določiti prednostna področja in dolgoročno strategijo za EIT in vključiti oceno njegovega gospodarskega učinka in sposobnosti ustvarjanja najboljše inovacijske dodane vrednosti.
The SIA should take into account the results of the monitoring and evaluation of the EIT.
V SIP bi bilo treba upoštevati rezultate spremljanja in vrednotenja EIT.
The first SIA should include detailed specifications and terms of reference concerning the operation of the EIT, the procedures for co-operation between the Governing Board and the Knowledge and Innovation Communities ("the KICs") and the methods of funding the KICs,
Prvi SIP bi moral vključevati podrobne specifikacije in pogoje v zvezi z delovanjem EIT, postopke sodelovanja med upravnim odborom in skupnostmi znanja in inovacij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SZI) in načine financiranja SZI –
The Strategic Innovation Agenda ("the SIA")of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for the period from 2014 to 2020 as set out in the annex is hereby adopted.
Sprejme se strateški inovacijski program (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SIP) Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo za obdobje od 2014 do 2020, kakor je določen v Prilogi.
The SIA shall be implemented in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 294/2008.
SIP se izvaja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 294/2008.
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (OJ L 97, 9.4.2008, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 294/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2008 o ustanovitvi Evropskega inštituta za inovacije in tehnologijo (UL L 97, 9.4.2008, str. 1).
OJ C 181, 21.6.2012, p. 122.
UL C 181, 21.6.2012, str. 122.
Position of the European Parliament of 21 November 2013 (not yet published in the Offical Journal)
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. novembra 2013 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu)
THE EIT STRATEGIC INNOVATION AGENDA
STRATEŠKI INOVACIJSKI PROGRAM EIT
Summary of Key Actions
Povzetek glavnih ukrepov
The European Institute of Innovation and Technology:
1. Evropski inštitut za inovacije in tehnologijo:
a Union innovation player
inovacijski akter na ravni unije
Addressing societal challenges via innovation in the knowledge triangle
reševanje družbenih izzivov z inovacijami v trikotniku znanja
EIT added value:
Dodana vrednost EIT:
distinguishing features
razlikovalne značilnosti
Synergies and complementarities with other policy and funding initiatives
Sinergije in dopolnjevanje z drugimi pobudami za politike in financiranje
Deepening the role of the EIT after 2013:
Poglobitev vloge EIT po letu 2013:
priorities
prednostne naloge
Incentivizing growth, impact and sustainability through the EIT
Spodbujanje rasti, vpliva in trajnostne narave prek EIT
Consolidating and fostering growth and impact of the existing KICs
Utrditev ter spodbujanje rasti in vpliva obstoječih SZI
Creating new KICs
Ustanavljanje novih SZI
Enhancing EIT's impact
Povečanje vpliva EIT
New delivery mechanisms and results-oriented monitoring
Novi mehanizmi za izvajanje in k rezultatom usmerjeno spremljanje
Effective decision making and working arrangements
Učinkovito odločanje in ureditev dela
Streamlining and clarifying EIT decision-making
Poenostavitev in razjasnitev odločanja EIT
Investing in KICs:
Vlaganje v SZI:
EIT-KIC relations
razmerja med EIT in SZI
Engaging with stakeholders
Sodelovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi
Estimate of financial needs and sources of funding 2014-2020
Ocena finančnih potreb in virov financiranja za obdobje 2014–2020
Consolidating a smart funding model towards KICs
Utrditev pametnega modela financiranja za SZI
EIT Budget needs
Proračunske potrebe EIT
Factsheet 1:
Informativni list 1:
Innovation for Healthy Living and Active Ageing
inovacije za zdravo življenje in dejavno staranje
Factsheet 2:
Informativni list 2:
Raw Materials – Sustainable Exploration, Extraction, Processing, Recycling and Substitution
surovine – trajnostno odkrivanje, pridobivanje, predelava, recikliranje in uporaba nadomestnih surovin.
Factsheet 3:
Informativni list 3:
Food4Future – Sustainable Supply Chain from Resources to Consumers
hrana za prihodnost – trajnostna oskrbovalna veriga od virov do potrošnikov
Factsheet 4:
Informativni list 4:
Added-value Manufacturing
proizvodnja z dodano vrednostjo
Factsheet 5:
Informativni list 5:
Urban Mobility
mobilnost v mestih
Section 2.1.1
Oddelek 2.1.1
The EIT will:
EIT bo:
Encourage KICs to develop a greater variety of and provide advice on educational and training activities and to raise awareness of the existence of these activities.
spodbujal SZI k razširitvi izbire dejavnosti izobraževanja in usposabljanja, k svetovanju o njih ter ozaveščanju o obstoju teh izobraževalnih programov;
Gradually set-up competitive review mechanisms for the allocation of a percentage of the KICs grant, which will be based on KICs' business plans and performance and which will take into account the fact that KICs grow at different speeds.
postopoma vzpostavil konkurenčne mehanizme pregleda za dodeljevanje odstotnega deleža nepovratnih sredstev SZI, ki bo odvisen od poslovnih načrtov in uspešnosti SZI in pri katerem se bo upoštevalo dejstvo, da SZI rastejo z različno hitrostjo;
Incentivise KICs to develop joint activities on horizontal issues.
spodbujal SZI k razvoju skupnih dejavnosti v zvezi s horizontalnimi vprašanji;
Set up a system of peer evaluations for EIT labelled qualifications and engage in dialogue with national and international quality assurance bodies to promote a consistent approach.
vzpostavil sistem strokovnega vrednotenja za kvalifikacije z znakom EIT in sodeloval v dialogu z nacionalnimi in mednarodnimi organi za zagotavljanje kakovosti, da bi spodbudil usklajen pristop.
Section 2.1.2
Oddelek 2.1.2
The EIT will
EIT bo:
Prepare a selection procedure for each wave of KICs which allows sufficient time for KIC applicants to prepare proposals.
pripravil izbirni postopek za vsak val SZI, ki bo prijaviteljem za SZI omogočal dovolj časa za pripravo predlogov;
Launch calls for five new KICs as follows:
objavil razpise za pet novih SZI:
a call for two new KICs in 2014 in the themes of Healthy Living and Active Ageing and Raw Materials;
razpis za dve novi SZI v letu 2014 za tematski področji „zdravo življenje in dejavno staranje“ ter „surovine“;
a call for two new KICs in 2016 in the themes of Food4Future and Added-value manufacturing and a call for one new KIC in 2018 in the theme of Urban Mobility.
razpis za dve novi SZI v letu 2016 za tematski področji „hrana za prihodnost“ in „proizvodnja z dodano vrednostjo“ ter eno novo SZI v letu 2018 za tematsko področje „mobilnost v mestih“;
Make best efforts to ensure that as many potential interested parties as possible are made aware of the future KIC selection procedures.
si po najboljših močeh prizadeval zagotoviti, da bo o prihodnjih izbirnih postopkih za SZI seznanil čim večje število potencialnih zainteresiranih strani;
Ensure that framework conditions of future KIC selection procedures are conducive to an optimal outcome, notably by providing clear guidance concerning requirements and processes, and by allowing sufficient time for proposers to organise the partnership.
zagotovil, da bodo okvirni pogoji prihodnjih izbirnih postopkov za SZI privedli do optimalnega izida, zlasti z jasnimi usmeritvami glede zahtev in postopkov, ter z zadostnim časom, da lahko predlagatelji organizirajo partnerstvo.
Section 2.2
Oddelek 2.2
Enhancing EIT's Impact
Povečanje vpliva EIT
Encourage participation in outreach activities and in particular provide support, as appropriate, to the KICs in relation to the Regional Innovation Scheme.
spodbujal udeležbo v dejavnostih ozaveščanja in po potrebi zlasti podpiral SZI v zvezi z regionalno inovacijsko shemo;
Set up/customise a web based tool to provide a platform for knowledge sharing and networking around the EIT.
vzpostavil oziroma prilagodil spletno orodje za zagotovitev platforme za izmenjavo znanja in povezovanje v mreže okrog EIT;
Build and support a functional and strong network of graduates from EIT/KIC educational and training activities ('EIT alumni').
vzpostavil in podpiral funkcionalno in močno mrežo diplomantov iz dejavnosti izobraževanja in usposabljanja v okviru EIT/SZI (v nadaljnjem besedilu: diplomanti EIT);
Ensure strong participation of the private sector, including SMEs, in the knowledge triangle.
zagotovil močno udeležbo zasebnega sektorja, tudi MSP, v trikotniku znanja.
Section 2.3
Oddelek 2.3
Set up a simplification agenda, including benchmarks to assess progress, and report to the Commission on its implementation progress through the Annual Activity Report;
vzpostavil program za poenostavitev, vključno z merili za ocenjevanje napredka, ter poročal Komisiji o napredku pri izvajanju tega programa na podlagi letnega poročila o dejavnostih;
ensure that new models of simplification are disseminated across the Union and inform other Union initiatives.
zagotovil, da se po vsej Uniji razširjajo modeli za poenostavitev, in obvestil druge pobude Unije;
Establish, in cooperation with the Commission and the KICs, a comprehensive system to monitor the EIT's contribution to Horizon 2020, the EIT's impact via its own and KIC activities and KIC results.
v sodelovanju s Komisijo in SZI vzpostavil celovit sistem za spremljanje prispevka EIT k programu Obzorje 2020, vpliva EIT prek lastnih dejavnosti in dejavnosti SZI ter rezultatov SZI.