natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of breaches by legal entities, Member States should be able to provide for the application of sanctions to members of administrative, management or supervisory bodies of the legal entity concerned or other individuals who can be held liable for those breaches under the conditions laid down in national law.
V primeru kršitev pravnih oseb bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da predvidijo uporabo sankcij za člane upravnih, poslovodnih ali nadzornih organov zadevne pravne osebe ali za druge posameznike, ki se pod pogoji, določenimi v nacionalni zakonodaji, lahko štejejo za odgovorne za te kršitve.
Member States should also be able to provide for the suspension of, or for the possibility of suspending, the exercise of voting rights for holders of shares and financial instruments who do not comply with the notification requirements.
Prav tako bi morale države članice imeti možnost predvideti začasno ukinitev ali morebitno začasno ukinitev uresničevanja glasovalnih pravic imetnikov delnic in finančnih instrumentov, ki ne izpolnjujejo zahtev glede obveščanja.
Member States should be able to provide that the suspension of voting rights is to apply only to the most serious breaches.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da določijo, da se začasna ukinitev glasovalnih pravic uporablja le za najhujše kršitve.
Directive 2004/109/EC should refer to both administrative sanctions and measures in order to cover all cases of non-compliance, irrespective of their qualification as a sanction or a measure under national law, and should be without prejudice to any provisions in the law of Member States relating to criminal sanctions.
Direktiva 2004/109/ES bi se morala nanašati na upravne sankcije in ukrepe ter tako zajemati vse primere neizpolnjevanja predpisov, ne glede na to, ali gre v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo za sankcijo ali za ukrep, in ne bi smela vplivati na določbe zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi s sankcijami po kazenskem pravu.
Member States should be able to provide for additional sanctions or measures and for higher levels of administrative pecuniary sanctions than those provided for in Directive 2004/109/EC, having regard to the need for sufficiently dissuasive sanctions in order to support clean and transparent markets.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da predvidijo dodatne sankcije ali ukrepe ter višje upravne denarne sankcije, kot so predvidene v Direktivi 2004/109/ES, in tako upoštevajo potrebo po določitvi dovolj odvračilnih sankcij za spodbujanje čistih in preglednih trgov.
The provisions regarding sanctions, and those regarding the publication of administrative sanctions, do not constitute a precedent for other Union legislation, in particular for more serious regulatory breaches.
Določbe v zvezi s sankcijami ter določbe v zvezi z objavo upravnih sankcij ne predstavljajo precedensa za drugo zakonodajo Unije, zlasti ne za hujše kršitve predpisov.
In order to ensure that decisions imposing an administrative measure or sanction have a dissuasive effect on the public at large, they should normally be published.
Da bi zagotovili, da bodo odločitve o naložitvi upravnega ukrepa ali sankcije odvračilno vplivale na širšo javnost, bi jih bilo treba praviloma objavljati.
The publication of decisions is also an important tool to inform market participants of what behaviour is considered to be in violation of Directive 2004/109/EC and to promote wider good behaviour amongst market participants.
Objava odločitev je tudi pomembno orodje za obveščanje udeležencev na trgu o tem, kakšno ravnanje se šteje za kršitev Direktive 2004/109/ES, in za spodbujanje širšega dobrega ravnanja med udeleženci na trgu.
However if the publication of a decision would seriously jeopardise the stability of the financial system or an ongoing official investigation or would, in so far as can be determined, cause disproportionate and serious damage to the institutions or individuals involved, or where, in the event that the sanction is imposed on a natural person, publication of personal data is shown to be disproportionate by an obligatory prior assessment of the proportionality of such publication, the competent authority should be able to decide to delay such publication or to publish the information on an anonymous basis.
Če pa bi objava odločitve resno ogrozila stabilnost finančnega sistema ali uradno preiskavo v teku, ali če bi vpletenim institucijam ali posameznikom povzročila nesorazmerno in hudo škodo, kolikor je to mogoče ugotoviti, ali če se v primeru, ko se sankcijo naloži fizični osebi, pri obvezni predhodni oceni sorazmernosti objave osebnih podatkov izkaže, da takšna objava ni sorazmerna, bi moral pristojni organ imeti možnost, da sklene, da takšno objavo odloži ali informacije objavi anonimno.
In order to clarify the treatment of non-listed securities represented by depository receipts admitted to trading on a regulated market and in order to avoid transparency gaps, the definition of ‘issuer’ should be further specified to include issuers of non-listed securities represented by depository receipts admitted to trading on a regulated market.
Da bi razjasnili obravnavanje vrednostnih papirjev, ki ne kotirajo na borzi in jih predstavljajo potrdila o hrambi, sprejeta v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu, ter preprečili vrzeli v preglednosti, bi bilo treba opredelitev „izdajatelja“ podrobneje določiti tako, da bi vključevala izdajatelje vrednostnih papirjev, ki ne kotirajo na borzi in jih predstavljajo potrdila o hrambi, sprejeta v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu.
It is also appropriate to amend the definition of ‘issuer’ taking into account the fact that in some Member States issuers of securities admitted to trading on a regulated market can be natural persons.
Primerno bi bilo tudi spremeniti opredelitev „izdajatelja“ tako, da bi upoštevali, da so lahko v nekaterih državah članicah izdajatelji vrednostnih papirjev, sprejetih v trgovanje na organiziranih trgih, fizične osebe.
Under Directive 2004/109/EC, in the case of a third-country issuer of debt securities the denomination per unit of which is less than EUR 1000 or of shares, the issuer’s home Member State is the Member State referred to in point (1)(m)(iii) of Article 2 of Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [9].
Na podlagi Direktive 2004/109/ES je v primeru izdajatelja iz tretje države, ki izdaja dolžniške vrednostne papirje, katerih nominalna vrednost na enoto je manjša od 1000 EUR, ali delnice, matična država članica izdajatelja država članica iz točke (iii) točke (m) člena 2(1) Direktive 2003/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9].
To clarify and simplify the determination of the home Member State of such third-country issuers, the definition of that term should be amended to establish that the home Member State is to be the Member State chosen by the issuer from amongst the Member States where its securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market.
Za razjasnitev in poenostavitev določitve matične države članice takšnih izdajateljev iz tretje države bi bilo treba opredelitev tega izraza spremeniti tako, da bi določal, da bi morala biti matična država članica tista država članica, ki jo izdajatelj izbere izmed držav članic, v katerih so njegovi vrednostni papirji sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu.
All issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market within the Union should be supervised by a competent authority of a Member State to ensure that they comply with their obligations.
Vsi izdajatelji, katerih vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu v Uniji, bi morali biti pod nadzorom pristojnega organa države članice, da bi zagotovili izpolnjevanje njihovih obveznosti.
Issuers who, under Directive 2004/109/EC, have to choose their home Member State but who have not done so, can avoid being supervised by any competent authority in the Union.
Izdajatelji, ki morajo na podlagi Direktive 2004/109/ES izbrati svojo matično državo, pa tega niso storili, se lahko izognejo vsakršnemu nadzoru pristojnega organa v Uniji.
Therefore, Directive 2004/109/EC should be amended to determine a home Member State for issuers that have not disclosed their choice of home Member State to the competent authorities within a three-month period.
Zato bi bilo treba Direktivo 2004/109/ES spremeniti tako, da bi določila matično državo članico za izdajatelje, ki pristojnim organom v roku treh mesecev ne razkrijejo izbire svoje matične države članice.
In such cases, the home Member State should be the Member State where the issuer’s securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market.
V takšnih primerih bi morala biti matična država članica tista država članica, v kateri so vrednostni papirji izdajatelja sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu.
Where the securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market in more than one Member State, all those Member States will be home Member States until the issuer chooses, and discloses, a single home Member State.
Če so vrednostni papirji sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu v več kot eni državi članici, bodo vse te države članice matične države članice, dokler izdajatelj ne izbere in razkrije ene same matične države članice.
This would become an incentive for such issuers to choose and disclose their choice of home Member State to the relevant competent authorities, and in the meantime competent authorities would no longer lack the necessary powers to intervene until an issuer has disclosed its choice of home Member State.
To bi takšne izdajatelje spodbudilo k izbiri matične države članice in razkritju svoje izbire ustreznim pristojnim organom, hkrati pa pristojni organi ne bi bili več brez potrebnih pooblastil za posredovanje, dokler izdajatelj ne bi razkril svoje izbire matične države članice.
Under Directive 2004/109/EC, in the case of an issuer of debt securities the denomination per unit of which is EUR 1000 or more, the issuer’s choice of a home Member State is valid for three years.
Na podlagi Direktive 2004/109/ES je v primeru izdajatelja dolžniških vrednostnih papirjev, katerih nominalna vrednost na enoto je 1000 EUR ali več, izdajateljeva izbira matične države članice veljavna tri leta.
However, where an issuer’s securities are no longer admitted to trading on the regulated market in the issuer’s home Member State and remain admitted to trading in one or more host Member States, such issuer has no relationship with the home Member State originally chosen by it where that is not the Member State of its registered office.
Kadar pa vrednostni papirji izdajatelja niso več sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu v matični državi članici izdajatelja, ostanejo pa sprejeti v trgovanje v eni ali več državah članicah gostiteljicah, takšen izdajatelj nima nobenega odnosa s svojo prvotno izbrano matično državo članico, če to ni država članica, v kateri ima sedež.
Such issuer should be able to choose one of its host Member States or the Member State where it has its registered office as its new home Member State before the expiration of the three-year period.
Takšen izdajatelj bi moral imeti možnost, da pred iztekom triletnega obdobja za svojo novo matično državo članico izbere eno od svojih držav članic gostiteljic ali državo članico, v kateri ima sedež.
The same possibility of choosing a new home Member State would also apply to a third-country issuer of debt securities the denomination per unit of which is less than EUR 1000 or of shares whose securities are no longer admitted to trading on the regulated market in the issuer’s home Member State but remain admitted to trading in one or more host Member States.
Enaka možnost izbire nove matične države članice bi veljala tudi za izdajatelja iz tretje države, ki izdaja dolžniške vrednostne papirje, katerih nominalna vrednost na enoto je manjša od 1000 EUR, ali deleži, katerih vrednostni papirji niso več sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu v matični državi članici izdajatelja, ostanejo pa sprejeti v trgovanje v eni ali več državah članicah gostiteljicah.
There should be consistency between Directives 2004/109/EC and 2003/71/EC concerning the definition of the home Member State.
Treba bi bilo zagotoviti skladnost med direktivama 2004/109/ES in 2003/71/ES, kar zadeva opredelitev pojma „matična država članica“.
In this respect, in order to ensure supervision by the most relevant Member State, Directive 2003/71/EC should be amended to provide for greater flexibility for situations where the securities of an issuer incorporated in a third country are no longer admitted to trading on the regulated market in its home Member State but instead are admitted to trading in one or more other Member States.
Da bi nadzor zagotavljala najrelevantnejša država članica, bi bilo treba v tem pogledu Direktivo 2003/71/ES spremeniti tako, da bi omogočala večjo prožnost v primerih, ko vrednostni papirji izdajatelja, registriranega v tretji državi, niso več sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu v njegovi matični državi članici, ostanejo pa sprejeti v trgovanje v eni ali več drugih državah članicah.
Commission Directive 2007/14/EC [10] contains, in particular, rules concerning the notification of the choice of the home Member State by the issuer.
Direktiva Komisije 2007/14/ES [10] vključuje zlasti pravila izdajatelju glede obveščanja o izbiri matične države članice.
Those rules should be incorporated into Directive 2004/109/EC.
Ta pravila bi bilo treba vključiti v Direktivo 2004/109/ES.
To ensure that competent authorities of the host Member State(s) and of the Member State where the issuer has its registered office, where such Member State is neither home nor host Member State, are informed about the choice of home Member State by the issuer, all issuers should be required to communicate the choice of their home Member State to the competent authority of their home Member State, the competent authorities of all host Member States and the competent authority of the Member State where they have their registered office, where it is different from their home Member State.
Da bi zagotovili, da so pristojni organi ene ali več držav članic gostiteljic in države članice, v kateri ima izdajatelj sedež, kadar takšna država članica ni ne matična država članica ne država članica gostiteljica, obveščeni o izdajateljevi izbiri matične države članice, bi morali vsi izdajatelji izbiro svoje matične države članice sporočiti pristojnemu organu svoje matične države članice, pristojnim organom vseh držav članic gostiteljic in pristojnemu organu države članice, v kateri imajo sedež, kadar to ni njihova matična država članica.
The rules concerning notification of the choice of home Member State should therefore be amended accordingly.
Pravila izdajatelju glede obveščanja o izbiri matične države članice bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The requirement under Directive 2004/109/EC regarding disclosure of new loan issues has led to many implementation problems in practice and its application is considered to be complex.
Zahteva na podlagi Direktive 2004/109/ES v zvezi z razkritjem novih izdaj posojil je v praksi povzročila že veliko težav pri izvajanju in njena uporaba velja za zapleteno.
Furthermore, that requirement overlaps partially with the requirements laid down in Directive 2003/71/EC and Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) [11] and it does not provide much additional information to the market.
Poleg tega se ta zahteva delno prekriva z zahtevami, določenimi v Direktivi 2003/71/ES ter v Direktivi 2003/6/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2003 o trgovanju z notranjimi informacijami in tržni manipulaciji (zloraba trga) [11], in trgu ne zagotavlja veliko dodatnih informacij.
Therefore, and in order to reduce unnecessary administrative burdens for issuers, that requirement should be abolished.
Zaradi tega in da bi izdajateljem zmanjšali nepotrebno upravno obremenitev, bi bilo treba to zahtevo odpraviti.
The requirement to communicate any amendment of an issuer’s instruments of incorporation or statutes to the competent authorities of the home Member State overlaps with the similar requirement under Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies [12] and can result in confusion regarding the role of the competent authority.
Zahteva po obveščanju pristojnih organov matične države članice o vseh spremembah ustanovitvenih aktov ali statutov izdajatelja se prekriva s podobno zahtevo na podlagi Direktive 2007/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o uveljavljanju določenih pravic delničarjev družb, ki kotirajo na borzi [12], in lahko povzroči nejasnost v zvezi z vlogo pristojnega organa.
A harmonised electronic format for reporting would be very beneficial for issuers, investors and competent authorities, since it would make reporting easier and facilitate accessibility, analysis and comparability of annual financial reports.
Usklajen elektronski obrazec za poročanje bi bil zelo koristen za izdajatelje, vlagatelje in pristojne organe, saj bi omogočil lažje poročanje ter dostopnost, analizo in primerljivost letnih računovodskih poročil.
Therefore, the preparation of annual financial reports in a single electronic reporting format should be mandatory with effect from 1 January 2020, provided that a cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken by ESMA.
Zato bi morala biti priprava letnih računovodskih poročil v enotni elektronski obliki poročanja obvezna od 1. januarja 2020, pod pogojem, da ESMA opravi analizo stroškov in koristi.
ESMA should develop draft technical regulatory standards, for adoption by the Commission, to specify the electronic reporting format, with due reference to current and future technological options, such as eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL).
ESMA bi moral pripraviti osnutke regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki jih sprejme Komisija, da se določi elektronska oblika poročanja, z ustrezno navedbo sedanjih in prihodnjih tehnoloških možnosti, kot je priprava računovodskih poročil v obliki XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language).
ESMA, when preparing the draft regulatory technical standards, should conduct open public consultations for all stakeholders concerned, make a thorough assessment of the potential impacts of the adoption of the different technological options, and conduct appropriate tests in Member States on which it should report to the Commission when it submits the draft regulatory technical standards.
ESMA bi moral pri pripravi osnutkov regulativnih tehničnih standardov opraviti javna posvetovanja za vse zadevne zainteresirane strani, temeljito oceno možnih učinkov sprejetja različnih tehnoloških možnosti in izvesti ustrezne preskuse v državah članicah, o tem pa poročati Komisiji ob predložitvi osnutkov regulativnih tehničnih standardov.
In developing the draft regulatory technical standards on the formats to be applied to banks and financial intermediaries and to insurance companies, ESMA should cooperate regularly and closely with the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [13], and the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [14], in order to take into account the specific characteristics of those sectors, ensuring cross-sectoral consistency of work and reaching joint positions.
ESMA bi moral pri oblikovanju osnutkov regulativnih tehničnih standardov za oblike, ki se uporabljajo za banke in finančne posrednike ter zavarovalnice, redno in tesno sodelovati z Evropskim nadzornim organom (Evropskim bančnim organom), ustanovljenim z Uredbo (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13], in Evropskim nadzornim organom (Evropskim organom za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine), ustanovljenim z Uredbo (EU) št. 1094/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14], da bi upoštevali posebne značilnosti teh sektorjev, zagotovili medsektorsko doslednost pri delu in oblikovali skupna stališča.
The European Parliament and the Council should be able to object to the regulatory technical standards pursuant to Article 13(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, in which case those standards should not enter into force.
Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala imeti v skladu s členom 13(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 možnost, da nasprotujeta regulativnim tehničnim standardom, ki v takem primeru ne bi smeli začeti veljati.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [15] and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [16], are fully applicable to the processing of personal data for the purposes of this Directive.
Pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov za namene te direktive se v celoti uporabljata Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [15] ter Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [16].
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as enshrined in the Treaty and has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles.
V tej direktivi so spoštovane temeljne pravice in upoštevana načela, priznana v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, kot določa Pogodba, in jo je v skladu s temi pravicami in načeli treba tudi izvajati.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to harmonise the transparency requirements relating to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale or effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer uskladitve zahtev po preglednosti v zvezi z informacijami o izdajateljih, katerih vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj zaradi njegovega obsega ali učinkov lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents [17], Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
V skladu s Skupno politično izjavo držav članic in Komisije z dne 28. septembra 2011 o obrazložitvenih dokumentih [17] se države članice zavezujejo, da bodo v upravičenih primerih uradnemu obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile en ali več dokumentov, v katerih se pojasni razmerje med sestavnimi deli direktive in ustrezajočimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
Directives 2004/109/EC, 2003/71/EC and 2007/14/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Direktive 2004/109/ES, 2003/71/ES in 2007/14/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
“issuer” means a natural person, or a legal entity governed by private or public law, including a State, whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market.
‚izdajatelj‘ je fizična ali pravna oseba, za katero velja zasebno ali javno pravo, vključno z državo, in katere vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na organiziranem trgu.