natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
21.05.1958, p.o.b. Mandalay
namestnik ministra za zunanje zadeve, datum rojstva: 21. maj 1958, kraj rojstva: Mandalay
21.01.1956, wife of Maung Myint
datum rojstva: 21. januar 1956, soproga Maunga Myinta
Deputy Minister for Livestock & Fisheries
namestnik ministra za živinorejo in ribištvo
identifying information (inc. company)
Podatki za ugotavljanje identitete (vključno s podjetjem)
Minister for Mines. Former Military Inspector General, d.o.b.
Thein Htaik, tudi Hteik, tudi Htike
Minister for National Planning and Economic Development and Minister for Livestock & Fisheries. Former Minister for Commerce, formerly Deputy Minister for Forestry
minister za državno načrtovanje in gospodarski razvoj ter minister za živinorejo in ribištvo, nekdanji minister za trgovino, prej namestnik ministra za gozdarstvo
Wife of Kyaw Hsan. Head of Information Department of Myanmar Women's Affairs Federation.
soproga Kyawa Hsana, vodja oddelka za informiranje Federacije za ženska vprašanja Mjanmara
Member of the Parliament (Upper House), Speaker of the Upper House. Former member of the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP)
nekdanji minister za kulturo, poslanec parlamenta (zgornjega doma), predsednik zgornjega doma, nekdanji član Stranke za skupno solidarnost in razvoj (USDP)
Minister for Home Affairs. Former Chief of Bureau of Special Operations 3 (Pegu, Irrawaddy, Arakan), p.o.b. Mandalay, d.o.b.
Generalpolkovnik Ko Ko
on the detailed arrangements for the collection of premiums for excess CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o podrobnih ureditvah za zbiranje premij za presežne emisije CO2 o določitvi standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nova lahka gospodarska vozila v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 510/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the Union’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles [1], and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2011 o določitvi standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nova lahka gospodarska vozila kot del celostnega pristopa Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih tovornih vozil [1] in zlasti člena 9(3) Uredbe,
Where the Commission, in accordance with Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, confirms, and in accordance with Article 10(2) of that Regulation, makes public, that a manufacturer has failed to comply with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, it shall in accordance with Article 9(1) of that Regulation impose excess emissions premiums on that manufacturer, or in the case of a pool, on the pool manager.
Kadar Komisija v skladu s členom 8(6) Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 potrdi in v skladu s členom 10(2) navedene uredbe objavi, da proizvajalec ni izpolnil zahtev iz člena 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011, v skladu s členom 9(1) navedene uredbe proizvajalcu ali, če gre za združenje, vodji združenja naloži plačilo premije za presežne emisije.
It is necessary to adopt detailed arrangements for the collection of those excess emissions premiums.
Treba je sprejeti podrobne ureditve za zbiranje teh premij za presežne emisije.
Pursuant to Article 9(4) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, the amounts of excess emissions premiums are to be considered as revenue for the general budget of the European Union and are to be entered and booked in title 7 of the general budget.
Na podlagi člena 9(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 se zneski premij za presežne emisije štejejo za prihodek v splošnem proračunu Evropske unije in se vnesejo ter knjižijo v poglavje 7 splošnega proračuna.
It is therefore appropriate to apply as collection method the rules for recovery of receivable amounts set out in Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] and Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3].
Zato je primerno, da se kot metoda zbiranja uporabijo pravila za izterjave, ki so določena v Uredbi Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], in v Uredbi Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [3].
For the purpose of establishing the amount receivable within the meaning of Article 71 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, it should be considered that, in accordance with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, the manufacturer is to be notified by the Commission of the provisional calculations of its average specific emissions of CO2 in the preceding year, the specific emissions target and the difference between its average specific emissions and the specific emissions target for that year, and must in accordance with Article 8(5) of that Regulation be given the possibility to verify those calculations and to notify the Commission of any errors within three months from receipt of the provisional calculations.
Za potrebe ugotavljanja terjatve v skladu s členom 71 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, je potrebno upoštevati, da v skladu s členom 8(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011, Komisija obvesti proizvajalca o začasnih izračunih njegovih povprečnih specifičnih emisij CO2 v predhodnem letu, o ciljih specifičnih emisij in o razliki med proizvajalčevimi povprečnimi specifičnimi emisijami CO2 v zadevnem letu ter njegov cilj specifičnih emisij za to leto, hkrati pa mora proizvajalec imeti v skladu s členom 8(5) navedene uredbe možnost, da te izračune preveri ter Komisijo v roku treh mesecev od prejema začasnih izračunov obvesti o morebitnih napakah.
In view of the exchange of views that takes place between the Commission and the manufacturer prior to the confirmation of the manufacturer’s performance in accordance with Article 8(6) and Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and the possibility given to the manufacturer for raising objections against the calculation of its performance, it should be considered that the Commission by confirming the performance has demonstrated that the debt exists and that the amount receivable is certain within the meaning of Article 71 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.
Glede na izmenjavo mnenj med Komisijo in proizvajalcem, ki poteka pred potrditvijo učinkovitosti proizvajalca v skladu s členom 8(6) in členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011, in glede na proizvajalčevo možnost ugovora na izračun učinkovitosti je treba upoštevati, da je Komisija s potrditvijo izračunov dokazala, da dolg obstaja ter da bo terjatev gotovo izvedena v skladu s členom 71 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
The excess emissions premium is to be calculated in accordance with the formulae laid down in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and is to be made public pursuant to Article 10 of that Regulation.
Premije za presežne emisije se izračunavajo v skladu s formulami iz člena 9(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 in se objavijo v skladu s členom 10 navedene uredbe.
The amount receivable should therefore be considered as a fixed amount that is due within the meaning of Article 71 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.
Terjatev je potrebno razumeti kot fiksno terjatev, ki zapade na podlagi člena 71 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
The Commission shall proceed with the recovery of the excess emissions premium calculated in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 by establishing a recovery order and by issuing a debit note addressed to the manufacturer concerned in accordance with the provisions set out in Articles 71 to 74 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 and Articles 78 to 89 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002.
Komisija nadaljuje z izterjavo premij za presežne emisije, izračunanih na podlagi člena 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011, z določitvijo vrstnega reda izterjav ter z izdajo opomina, ki je naslovljen na zadevnega proizvajalca v skladu z določbami iz členov 71 do 74 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 ter členov 78 do 89 Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002.
OJ L 145, 31.5.2011, p. 1.
UL L 145, 31.5.2011, str. 1.
on a method for the collection of premiums for excess CO2 emissions from new passenger cars pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o metodi za zbiranje premij za presežne emisije CO2 novih osebnih avtomobilov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles [1], and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o določitvi standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nove osebne avtomobile kot del celostnega pristopa Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih tovornih vozil [1] in zlasti člena 9(3) Uredbe,
Where the Commission, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, confirms and, in accordance with Article 10(2) of that Regulation, makes public, that a manufacturer has failed to comply with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, it shall in accordance with Article 9(1) of that Regulation impose excess emissions premiums on that manufacturer, or in the case of a pool, on the pool manager.
Kadar Komisija v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 8(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 potrdi in v skladu s členom 10(2) navedene uredbe objavi, da proizvajalec ni izpolnil zahtev iz člena 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009, v skladu s členom 9(1) navedene uredbe proizvajalcu ali, če gre za združenje, vodji združenja naloži plačilo premije za presežne emisije.
It is necessary to establish the methods for collecting those excess emissions premiums.
Treba je določiti metode za zbiranje teh premij za presežne emisije.
Pursuant to Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, the amounts of excess emissions premiums are to be considered as revenue for the general budget of the European Union and are to be entered and booked in Title 7 of the general budget.
Na podlagi člena 9(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 se zneski premij za presežne emisije štejejo za prihodek v splošnem proračunu Evropske unije in se vnesejo ter knjižijo v poglavje 7 splošnega proračuna.
For the purpose of establishing the amount receivable within the meaning of Article 71 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, it should be considered that, in accordance with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, the manufacturer is to be notified by the Commission of the provisional calculations of its average specific emissions of CO2 in the preceding year, the specific emissions target and the difference between its average specific emissions and the specific emissions target for that year, and must, in accordance with Article 8(5) of that Regulation, be given the possibility to verify those calculations and to notify the Commission of any errors within 3 months from receipt of the provisional calculations.
Za potrebe ugotavljanja terjatve v skladu s členom 71 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, je potrebno upoštevati, da v skladu s členom 8(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009, Komisija obvesti proizvajalca o začasnih izračunih njegovih povprečnih specifičnih emisij CO2 v predhodnem koledarskem letu, o ciljih specifičnih emisij in o razliki med proizvajalčevimi povprečnimi specifičnimi emisijami CO2 v predhodnem koledarskem letu ter ciljem specifičnih emisij za to leto, hkrati pa mora proizvajalec imeti v skladu s členom 8(5) navedene uredbe možnost, da te izračune preveri ter Komisijo v roku treh mesecev od prejema začasnih izračunov obvesti o morebitnih napakah.
In view of the exchange of views that takes place between the Commission and the manufacturer prior to the confirmation of the manufacturer’s performance in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 8(5) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, and the possibility given to the manufacturer for raising objections against the calculation of its performance, it should be considered that the Commission by confirming the performance has demonstrated that the debt exists and that the amount receivable is certain within the meaning of Article 71 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.
Glede na izmenjavo mnenj med Komisijo in proizvajalcem, ki poteka pred potrditvijo učinkovitosti proizvajalca v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 8(5) in člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009, in glede na proizvajalčevo možnost ugovora na izračun učinkovitosti je treba upoštevati, da je Komisija s potrditvijo izračunov dokazala, da dolg obstaja ter da bo terjatev izvedena v skladu s členom 71 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
The excess emissions premium is to be calculated in accordance with the formulae laid down in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and is to be made public pursuant to Article 10 of that Regulation.
Premije za presežne emisije se izračunavajo v skladu s formulami, iz člena 9(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 in se objavijo v skladu s členom 10 navedene uredbe.
The amount receivable should therefore be considered as a fixed amount that is due within the meaning of Article 71 of Regulation (EC Euratom) No 1605/2002.
Terjatev je potrebno razumeti kot fiksno terjatev, ki zapade na podlagi člena 71 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
The Commission shall proceed with the recovery of the excess emissions premium calculated in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 by establishing a recovery order and by issuing a debit note addressed to the manufacturer concerned in accordance with the provisions set out in Articles 71 to 74 of Regulation (EC Euratom) No 1605/2002 and Articles 78 to 89 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002.
Komisija nadaljuje z izterjavo premij za presežne emisije, izračunanih na podlagi člena 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009, z določitvijo vrstnega reda izterjav ter z izdajo opomina, ki je naslovljen na zadevnega proizvajalca v skladu z določbami iz členov 71 do 74 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 ter členov 78 do 89 Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002.
amending Decision 2005/51/EC as regards the period during which soil contaminated by pesticides or persistent organic pollutants may be introduced into the Union for decontamination purposes
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/51/ES glede obdobja, v katerem se lahko za namene dekontaminacije v Unijo vnaša zemlja, onesnažena s pesticidi ali težko razgradljivimi organskimi snovmi
By way of derogation from Directive 2000/29/EC, Commission Decision 2005/51/EC of 21 January 2005 authorising Member States temporarily to provide for derogations from certain provisions of Council Directive 2000/29/EC in respect of the importation of soil contaminated by pesticides or persistent organic pollutants for decontamination purposes [2] authorises, for a limited period, Member States participating in the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) programme on prevention and disposal of obsolete and unwanted pesticides to permit the introduction of soil contaminated by such pesticides into the Union for treatment in dedicated hazardous waste incinerators.
Z odstopanjem od Direktive 2000/29/ES Odločba Komisije 2005/51/ES z dne 21. januarja 2005 o začasnih pooblastilih državam članicam za določitev odstopanj od nekaterih določb Direktive Sveta 2000/29/ES glede uvoza zemlje, kontaminirane s pesticidi ali težko razgradljivimi organskimi snovmi, za namene dekontaminacije [2] državam članicam, ki sodelujejo v programu preprečevanja nabiranja in odstranjevanja zastarelih in nezaželenih pesticidov Organizacije združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO), za omejeno obdobje dovoljuje vnos zemlje, onesnažene s takšnimi pesticidi, v Unijo za obdelavo v namenskih sežigalnicah nevarnih odpadkov.
In view of the circumstances justifying the derogation granted by Decision 2005/51/EC and in the interest of good legislative practice, it is now appropriate to extend that derogation by 5 years.
Na podlagi okoliščin, ki upravičujejo odstopanje, odobreno z Odločbo 2005/51/ES, in v interesu dobre zakonodajne prakse je zdaj primerno razširiti odstopanje za pet let.
In the second paragraph of Article 1 of Decision 2005/51/EC the words ‘29 February 2012’ are replaced by the words ‘28 February 2017’.
V drugem odstavku člena 1 Odločbe 2005/51/ES se besede „29. februarjem 2012“ nadomestijo z „28. februarjem 2017“.
on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies in Germany concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) for the 2010 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov nekaterih plačilnih agencij v Nemčiji v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), za proračunsko leto 2010
Commission Implementing Decision 2011/271/EU [2] cleared for the 2010 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the Belgian paying agency ‘Région Wallonne’, the German paying agencies ‘Baden-Württemberg’, ‘Bayern’, ‘Helaba’ and ‘Rheinland-Pfalz’, the Italian paying agency ‘ARBEA’, the Luxembourg paying agency ‘Ministère de l’agriculture, de la Viticulture et du Développement rural’ and the Slovakian paying agency ‘APA’.
Z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2011/271/EU [2] so bili za proračunsko leto 2010 potrjeni obračuni vseh plačilnih agencij razen obračunov belgijske plačilne agencije „Région Wallonne“, nemških plačilnih agencij „Baden-Württemberg“, „Bayern“, „Helaba“ in „Rheinland-Pfalz“, italijanske plačilne agencije „ARBEA“, luksemburške plačilne agencije „Ministère de l’agriculture, de la Viticulture et du Développement rural“ in slovaške plačilne agencije „APA“.
Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the German paying agencies ‘Baden-Württemberg’, ‘Bayern’, ‘Helaba’ and ‘Rheinland-Pfalz’.
Po prejetju novih informacij in dodatnih preverjanjih lahko Komisija zdaj v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), sprejme sklep o celovitosti, točnosti in verodostojnosti obračunov, ki so jih predložile nemške plačilne agencije „Baden-Württemberg“, „Bayern“, „Helaba“ in „Rheinland-Pfalz“.
The accounts of the German paying agencies ‘Baden-Württemberg’, ‘Bayern’, ‘Helaba’ and ‘Rheinland-Pfalz’ concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in respect of the 2010 financial year, are hereby cleared.
Obračuni nemških plačilnih agencij „Baden-Württemberg“, „Bayern“, „Helaba“ in „Rheinland-Pfalz“ v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), za proračunsko leto 2010 se s tem sklepom potrdijo.
OJ L 119, 7.5.2011, p. 15.
UL L 119, 7.5.2011, str. 15.
CLEARANCE OF DISJOINED EXPENDITURE BY RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2010
POTRDITEV LOČENIH ODHODKOV ZA POSAMEZEN PROGRAM RAZVOJA PODEŽELJA ZA PRORAČUNSKO LETO 2010
CCI
UIS
Expenditure 2010
Odhodki za leto 2010
Accepted amount cleared for FY 2010
Sprejeti znesek, potrjen za proračunsko leto 2010
on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies in Germany concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) for the 2008 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov nekaterih plačilnih agencij v Nemčiji v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), za proračunsko leto 2008
Commission Decisions 2009/373/EC [2], 2010/59/EU [3], 2010/721/EU [4] and 2011/103/EU [5] cleared, for the 2008 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the German paying agency ‘Bayern’ and the Greek paying agency ‘OPEKEPE’.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2009/373/ES [2] in Sklepi Komisije 2010/59/EU [3], 2010/721/EU [4] in 2011/103/EU [5] so bili za proračunsko leto 2008 potrjeni obračuni vseh plačilnih agencij, razen nemške plačilne agencije „Bayern“ in grške plačilne agencije „OPEKEPE“.
Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the German paying agency ‘Bayern’.
Po prejetju novih informacij in dodatnih preverjanjih lahko Komisija zdaj v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), sprejme sklep o celovitosti, točnosti in verodostojnosti obračunov, ki jih je predložila nemška plačilna agencija „Bayern“.
The accounts of the German paying agency ‘Bayern’ concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in respect of the 2008 financial year, are hereby cleared.
Obračuni nemške plačilne agencije „Bayern“ v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), za proračunsko leto 2008 se s tem sklepom potrdijo.
OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 27.
UL L 42, 16.2.2011, str. 27.
CLEARANCE OF DISJOINED EXPENDITURE BY RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME FOR FINANCIAL YEAR 2008
POTRDITEV IZVZETIH IZDATKOV PO PROGRAMIH ZA RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA ZA PRORAČUNSKO LETO 2008
Expenditure 2008
Izdatki za leto 2008
concerning State aid C 19/09 (ex N 64/09) which Denmark intends to implement regarding the restructuring of TV2 Danmark A/S
o državni pomoči št. C 19/09 (ex N 64/09), ki jo Danska namerava izvajati v zvezi s prestrukturiranjem TV2 Danmark A/S
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to these provisions [2], and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama [2], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 4 August 2008, the Commission notified Denmark of its decision not to raise objections to the rescue aid to be granted to TV2 Danmark A/S in the form of a credit facility totalling DKK 1000 million (hereinafter ‘the rescue aid decision’) [3].
Komisija je 4. avgusta 2008 obvestila Dansko o svojem sklepu, da ne bo vložila ugovora zoper pomoč za reševanje, ki naj bi se odobrila TV2 Danmark A/S v obliki posojila v skupni vrednosti 1000 milijonov DKK (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o pomoči za reševanje) [3].
That decision found that the planned aid was compatible with Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty, now Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and, in particular, with the rules laid down in the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [4] (hereinafter ‘the Guidelines’).
V tem sklepu je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila načrtovana pomoč v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES, ki je postal člen 107(3)(c) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), ter zlasti s pravili, določenimi v Smernicah Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Smernice).
Pursuant to the rescue aid decision and the Guidelines, the Commission had to be provided with a restructuring plan or a liquidation plan, or proof that the loan had been reimbursed in full not later than 6 months after authorisation of the rescue aid measure, i.e. by 4 February 2009 at the latest.
Komisiji je bilo treba v skladu s sklepom o pomoči za reševanje in Smernicami zagotoviti načrt prestrukturiranja ali načrt za likvidacijo ali dokaz, da je bilo posojilo v celoti povrnjeno najpozneje v šestih mesecih po odobritvi ukrepa pomoči za reševanje, tj. najpozneje do 4. februarja 2009.