natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The proposal by Germany to restrict the authorisation granted by the United Kingdom on 28 October 2011 of the product mentioned in the Annex, by excluding food protection from the authorised intended uses of the product, is rejected.
Predlog Nemčije za omejitev dovoljenja, ki ga je 28. oktobra 2011 izdalo Združeno kraljestvo za sporni pripravek iz Priloge, in sicer za izključitev zaščite živil iz dovoljenih predvidenih uporab pripravka, se zavrne.
See, in this respect, a published guidance document agreed between the Commission services and the competent authorities of Member States for the biocidal products Directive 98/8/EC and for the plant protection products Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1) entitled Borderline between Directive 98/8/EC concerning the placing on the market of Biocidal product and Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing on the market of plant protection products, available on the website http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/evaluation/borderline_en.htm
V zvezi s tem glej objavljene smernice, dogovorjene med službami Komisije in pristojnimi organi držav članic za biocidne pripravke iz Direktive 98/8/ES in za fitofarmacevtska sredstva iz Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS (UL L 230, 19.8.1991, str. 1) z naslovom „Upravičena razmejitev med Direktivo 98/8/ES o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet in Direktivo 91/414/EGS o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev na trg“, ki je na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/evaluation/borderline_en.htm.
Product for which the proposal by Germany, to restrict the authorisation granted in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 98/8/EC, is rejected:
Predlog Nemčije za omejitev dovoljenja za pripravek, izdanega v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 98/8/ES, se zavrne:
United Kingdom application reference number in the Register for Biocidal Products
Referenčna številka vloge v registru biocidnih pripravkov v Združenem kraljestvu
Furthermore, even the application in commercial kitchens cannot be considered as primarily intended for plant product protection: First, the contested product must not be directly applied on food or indirectly come into contact with food through application on empty structures.
Poleg tega se tudi uporaba v komercialnih kuhinjah ne more šteti predvsem za varstvo rastlinskih proizvodov, saj se sporni pripravek ne sme neposredno nanašati na živilo ali posredno priti v stik z živilom prek uporabe na praznih strukturah;
Second, most products handled in a commercial kitchen are not plant products [4]. Third, Member States other than Germany have informed the Commission that the contested product is used in kitchens to comply with the general hygiene requirements according to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs [5] for all stages of production, processing and distribution.
večina izdelkov, s katerimi se ravna v komercialni kuhinji, niso rastlinski proizvodi [4] ter države članice, razen Nemčije, so obvestile Komisijo, da se sporni pripravek uporablja v kuhinjah, ki v vseh fazah proizvodnje, predelave in distribucije izpolnjujejo splošne higienske zahteve iz Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 852/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o higieni živil [5].
of 4 March 2013
z dne 4. marca 2013
establishing the user’s guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)
o uvedbi navodil za uporabnike, v katerih so predstavljeni koraki, ki jih je treba opraviti za pristop k sistemu EMAS, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS)
(notified under document C(2013) 1114)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 1114)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC [1], and in particular Article 46(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS), razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 761/2001 ter odločb Komisije 2001/681/ES in 2006/193/ES [1], in zlasti člena 46(5) Uredbe, ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
To provide additional information clarifying the steps needed to participate in EMAS, the Commission adopts this user guide.
Komisija s sprejetjem teh navodil za uporabnike zagotavlja dodatne informacije za pojasnitev korakov, ki jih je treba opraviti za pristop k sistemu EMAS.
Done at Brussels, 4 March 2013.
V Bruslju, 4. marca 2013
User’s guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)
Navodila za uporabnike, v katerih so predstavljeni koraki, ki jih je treba opraviti za pristop k sistemu EMAS, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS)
It is an objective of EU environmental policy to encourage all kinds of organisations to use environmental management systems and reduce their environmental impacts.
Cilj okoljske politike EU je spodbuditi vse vrste organizacij k uporabi sistemov okoljskega ravnanja in zmanjšanju svojih vplivov na okolje.
Environmental management systems are one of the possible tools for companies and other organisations to improve their environmental performance whilst saving energy and other resources.
Sistemi okoljskega ravnanja spadajo med možna orodja, s katerimi lahko družbe in druge organizacije izboljšajo svojo okoljsko uspešnost ter varčujejo z energijo in drugimi viri.
In particular, the EU would like to encourage organisations to participate in the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) which is a management tool for companies and other organisations to evaluate, report and improve their environmental performance.
Cilj EU je zlasti spodbuditi organizacije k sodelovanju v sistemu za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS), ki je orodje za upravljanje, s katerim lahko družbe ter druge organizacije ocenijo in izboljšajo svojo okoljsko uspešnost ter poročajo o njej.
EMAS was established in 1993 and evolved over time.
Sistem EMAS je bil ustanovljen leta 1993 in se je razvijal postopoma.
The EMAS Regulation [1] provides the legal basis for the scheme and the latest revision dates back to 2009.
Uredba EMAS [1], ki je bila zadnjič spremenjena leta 2009, zagotavlja zakonsko podlago za sistem.
This ‘EMAS User’s Guide’ has been prepared according to the requirements of Article 46(5) of the EMAS Regulation.
Navodila za uporabnike sistema EMAS so bila pripravljena v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 46(5) Uredbe EMAS.
This document aims to deliver clear, simple advice for organisations interested in EMAS.
Cilj tega dokumenta je zagotoviti jasne in enostavne nasvete za organizacije, ki želijo sodelovati v sistemu EMAS.
It is intended to offer step-by-step instructions that are easy to follow.
Namenjen je zagotavljanju navodil s koraki, ki jih je preprosto upoštevati.
The guide outlines the main elements and steps to be undertaken by an organisation that intends to participate in the scheme.
Navodila zajemajo glavne elemente in korake, ki jih mora organizacija, ki namerava sodelovati v sistemu EMAS, opraviti.
The document aims to increase the overall uptake of the EMAS management system by facilitating the entry of organisations into the scheme.
Cilj dokumenta je povečati splošno uporabo sistema ravnanja EMAS z olajšanjem pristopa organizacij k zadevnemu sistemu.
It is also important to keep in mind the general objective of the European Regulation, which is to harmonise implementation across all Member States and create a common legislative framework.
Upoštevati je treba tudi splošni cilj Evropske uredbe, tj. uskladitev izvajanja v vseh državah članicah in oblikovanje skupnega zakonodajnega okvira.
For specific ‘EMAS Global’ related issues the reader is referred to the ‘Commission Decision 2011/832/EU, of 7 December 2011 concerning a guide on EU corporate registration, third country and global registration under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS)’ [2].II.
Bralec najde več informacij v zvezi z globalno registracijo EMAS v Sklepu Komisije 2011/832/EU z dne 7. decembra 2011 o navodilih za registracijo družb na ravni EU in tretjih držav ter globalno registracijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS) [2].II.
WHAT IS THE ECO-MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT SCHEME (EMAS)?
KAJ JE SISTEM SKUPNOSTI ZA OKOLJSKO RAVNANJE IN PRESOJO (EMAS)?
EMAS is a voluntary tool available to any organisation operating in any economic sector within or outside the European Union that wants to:
Sistem EMAS je prostovoljno orodje, na voljo vsem organizacijam, ki delujejo v katerem koli gospodarskem sektorju v Evropski uniji ali zunaj nje in želijo:
assume environmental and economic responsibility;
prevzeti okoljsko in gospodarsko odgovornost,
improve its environmental performance;
izboljšati svojo okoljsko uspešnost ter
communicate its environmental results to society and stakeholders in general.
sporočiti svoje okoljske rezultate družbi in zainteresiranim stranem na splošno.
Below is a step-by-step outline on what needs to be done to register for the scheme and implement it.
Spodaj so opisani koraki, potrebni za registriranje v sistem EMAS in njegovo izvajanje.
Organisations that register with EMAS have to:
Organizacije, ki se registrirajo v sistem EMAS, morajo izpolnjevati naslednje zahteve:
prove compliance with environmental legislation;
dokazati morajo skladnost z okoljsko zakonodajo,
make a commitment to continually improving their environmental performance;
zavezati se morajo k stalnemu izboljševanju svoje okoljske uspešnosti,
show they have an open dialogue with all stakeholders;
dokazati morajo, da vodijo odprt dialog z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi,
involve employees in improving the organisation’s environmental performance;
zaposlene morajo vključevati v izboljšanje okoljske uspešnosti organizacije,
publish and update a validated EMAS environmental statement for external communication.
objaviti in posodabljati morajo potrjeno okoljsko izjavo EMAS za zunanje komuniciranje.
There are some further requirements.
Obstaja nekaj dodatnih zahtev.
Organisations have to:
Organizacije morajo:
conduct an environmental review (including the identification of all direct and indirect environmental aspects);
opraviti okoljski pregled (vključno z opredelitvijo vseh neposrednih in posrednih okoljskih vidikov) in
register by a competent body after successful verification of their organisation.
se po uspešni preveritvi organizacije registrirati pri pristojnemu organu.
Once registered, organisations are entitled to use the EMAS logo.
Organizacije lahko po registraciji začnejo uporabljati logotip EMAS.
COSTS AND BENEFITS OF IMPLEMENTING EMAS
STROŠKI IN KORISTI IZVAJANJA SISTEMA EMAS
In general, environmental management systems such as EMAS help organisations to improve resource efficiency, reduce risks and set an example with their public declaration of good practice.
Sistemi okoljskega ravnanja, kot je EMAS, organizacijam na splošno pomagajo izboljšati učinkovito rabo virov, zmanjšati tveganja in dajati dober zgled z javno izjavo o dobri praksi.
The costs of implementing a scheme are outweighed by the savings.
Prihranki presegajo stroške izvajanja sistema.
A study [3] has been carried out on the costs and benefits of registering with EMAS.
Izvedena je bila študija [3] stroškov in koristi registracije v sistem EMAS.
Those taking part in a survey were asked to select the impacts that had been most positive from a given list.
Sodelujoči v raziskavi so bili pozvani k izbiri najbolj pozitivnih učinkov s seznama.
‘Energy/resource saving’ ranked top (21 %), as shown in Figure 1.
Največ sodelujočih je izbralo možnost „prihranek energije/virov“ (21 %), kot je prikazano na sliki 1.
This was followed by ‘reduction in negative incidents’ (18 %) and ‘improved stakeholder relationships’ (17 %).
Sledili sta ji možnosti „manjše število negativnih dogodkov“ (18 %) in „boljši odnosi z zainteresiranimi stranmi“ (17 %).
Benefits of implementing EMAS (% all responses)
Koristi izvajanja sistema EMAS (% vseh odgovorov)
More efficiency savings
Večja stroškovna učinkovitost
The benefit ‘Energy and resource savings’ ranked top.
Korist „prihranek energije/virov“ je zasedla prvo mesto.
For organisations of all sizes, there was evidence that energy savings alone exceeded the annual costs of maintaining EMAS.
Pri organizacijah vseh velikosti so obstajali dokazi, da že sam prihranek energije presega letne stroške vzdrževanja sistema EMAS.
This suggests that larger organisations should easily be able to recover the costs of implementing EMAS.
To pomeni, da bi si lahko večje organizacije zlahka povrnile stroške izvajanja sistema EMAS.
Fewer negative incidents
Manjše število negativnih dogodkov
This benefit ranked second.
Ta korist je zasedla drugo mesto.
Several factors, such as the lower incidence of breaches of environmental law, came into play.
Upoštevanih je bilo več dejavnikov, na primer manjše število kršitev okoljske zakonodaje.
This obviously links up with benefits in terms of better relations with regulatory authorities.
To je seveda povezano s koristmi zaradi boljših odnosov z regulativnimi organi.
Better relations with stakeholders
Boljši odnosi z zainteresiranimi stranmi
Organisations rated better relations with stakeholders as a key benefit, particularly in the case of public administration and service companies.
Organizacije so boljše odnose z zainteresiranimi stranmi označile za ključno korist, zlasti v primeru javne uprave in storitvenih družb.
More market opportunities
Več tržnih priložnosti
Registering for EMAS can improve business.
Registracija v sistem EMAS lahko izboljša poslovanje.
It can help retain existing customers and win new business.
Prispeva lahko k ohranjanju obstoječih strank in pridobivanju novih.
For public procurement, having an EMAS environmental management system can be an advantage.
Obstoj sistema okoljskega ravnanja EMAS lahko pomeni prednost na področju javnih naročil.
Though organisations involved in public procurement cannot explicitly require bidders to be EMAS-registered, companies that are registered can use this to show they have the technical means to fulfil contractual environmental management requirements.
Čeprav organizacije, vključene v javna naročila, od ponudnikov ne smejo izrecno zahtevati, da so registrirani v sistem EMAS, lahko registrirane družbe to dejstvo izkoristijo za dokazovanje, da so tehnično sposobne izpolniti pogodbene zahteve glede okoljskega ravnanja.
Moreover, organisations may encourage their suppliers to have an environmental management system in place as part of their own environmental policy.
Poleg tega lahko organizacije svoje dobavitelje spodbujajo k vzpostavitvi sistema okoljskega ravnanja v okviru njihove okoljske politike.
Being EMAS-registered may make internal business-to-business procedures easier for both parties.
Registracija v sistem EMAS lahko olajša notranje postopke med obema družbama. Oprostitev uporabe zakonskih določb
There may be benefits for companies involved in manufacturing sectors, with advantages under Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control legislation [4].Several Member States also offer advantages to EMAS-registered organisations regarding state and regional environmental laws and regulations.
Obstajajo lahko koristi za družbe, vključene v proizvodne sektorje, pri čemer prednosti izhajajo iz zakonodaje za celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja [4].Več držav članic ponuja prednosti organizacijam, registriranim v sistem EMAS, tudi v zvezi z državnimi in regionalnimi okoljskimi zakoni in predpisi.
Such benefits may, for instance, involve simplified reporting obligations; fewer inspections, lower waste fees and longer periods between permit renewals.
Take koristi lahko na primer vključujejo poenostavljene obveznosti poročanja, manjše število inšpekcijskih pregledov, nižje pristojbine za odpadke in daljša obdobja med obnavljanjem dovoljenja.
a 20-30 % reduction in fees for licensing procedures; a reduction of up to 100 % in fees for monitoring and enforcement under national law, a 30 % reduction in fees for public services performed by government agencies, a 30 % reduction in fees for surface water licensing procedures, groundwater extraction permits and for landfill licensing procedures.
dstotno znižanje pristojbin za odpadke, 20- do 30-odstotno znižanje pristojbin za postopke izdaje licenc, do 100-odstotno znižanje pristojbin za spremljanje in izvrševanje v okviru nacionalne zakonodaje, 30-odstotno znižanje pristojbin za javne storitve, ki jih izvajajo vladne agencije, 30-odstotno znižanje pristojbin za postopke izdaje licenc v zvezi s površinsko vodo, dovoljenj za črpanje podtalnice in izdaje licenc za odlagališča odpadkov.
There are also advantages when it comes to administration of monitoring and handling of hazardous chemicals, waste disposal obligations (by not having to demonstrate technical supervision measures) and greenhouse gases monitoring.
Obstajajo tudi koristi v zvezi z upravljanjem spremljanja nevarnih kemikalij in ravnanja z njimi, obveznostmi glede odlaganja odpadkov (ker ni treba dokazovati tehničnih nadzornih ukrepov) in spremljanjem toplogrednih plinov.
Costs and benefits
Stroški in koristi
Businesses should regard registering for EMAS as an investment.
Družbe bi morale na registracijo v sistem EMAS gledati kot na naložbo.
Costs and potential annual efficiency savings in EMAS [10]Source:
Stroški in možna letna stroškovna učinkovitost v sistemu EMAS [10]Vir:
‘Costs and Benefits of EMAS to Registered Organisations’, study for European Commission, 2009.
„Costs and Benefits of EMAS to Registered Organisations“ (Stroški in koristi sistema EMAS za registrirane organizacije), študija za Evropsko komisijo, 2009.
Organisation size [11]
Velikost organizacije [11]
Potential annual efficiency savings
Možna letna stroškovna učinkovitost
First year implementation costs [12] of EMAS
Stroški izvajanja [12] sistema EMAS v prvem letu
EMAS Annual costs [13](EUR)
Letni stroški sistema EMAS [13](EUR)
Data on ‘Potential annual efficiency savings’ are based on energy savings only.
Podatki v stolpcu „Možna letna stroškovna učinkovitost“ temeljijo le na prihranku energije.
No data are available on resource efficiency savings.
Podatki v zvezi s prihrankom zaradi učinkovite rabe virov niso na voljo.
The EMAS ‘Toolkit for small organisations’ [14] provides many other examples of cost/benefit savings.
Zbirka orodij EMAS za majhne organizacije [14] zagotavlja veliko drugih primerov prihrankov pri stroških/koristih.
As a whole, micro and small organisations face proportionally higher fixed and external costs than medium or large organisations, since the latter benefit from economies of scale, with a higher proportion of costs borne internally by environment departments, and lower external costs as they have less need for consultants.
Mikro in majhne organizacije se v splošnem soočajo s sorazmerno višjimi fiksnimi in zunanjimi stroški kot srednje in velike organizacije, saj imajo slednje prednost zaradi ekonomije obsega, pri čemer višji delež stroškov notranje nosijo okoljski oddelki, ter nižje zunanje stroške, saj potrebujejo manj svetovalcev.
However, even very large organisations are advised to investigate implementation costs in detail.
Vendar se celo zelo velikim organizacijam svetuje podrobna proučitev stroškov izvajanja.
EMAS and energy management systems such as EN 16001 and ISO 50001 are quite similar.
Sistem EMAS in sistemi okoljskega ravnanja, kot sta standarda EN 16001 in ISO 50001, so precej podobni.
As management of energy use is part of EMAS, EMAS registered organisations already improve their energy efficiency, consequently they fulfil most EN 16001 and ISO 50001 requirements.
Ker je upravljanje porabe energije del sistema EMAS, organizacije, registrirane v sistem EMAS, že izboljšujejo svojo energetsko učinkovitost, zato izpolnjujejo večino zahtev iz standardov EN 16001 in ISO 50001.
Therefore this can also result in cost reductions.
To lahko prav tako povzroči znižanje stroškov.
Organisations considering EMAS registration should also take into account the technical and financial support or subsidies that Member States, national, regional or local authorities and EMAS Competent Bodies offer.
Organizacije, ki premišljujejo o registraciji v sistem EMAS, bi morale upoštevati tudi tehnično in finančno podporo ali subvencije, ki jih omogočajo države članice, nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni organi in pristojni organi sistema EMAS.
EMAS REGULATION
UREDBA EMAS
The EMAS scheme was established in Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 (also known as EMAS III) and is directly applicable in all Member States.
Sistem EMAS je bil ustanovljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 (znano tudi kot EMAS III) in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Since 2001, any public or private organisation can implement EMAS.
Od leta 2001 lahko sistem EMAS izvaja vsaka javna ali zasebna organizacija.
With EMAS III, the scheme is also available to non-European organisations or European companies operating in non-European countries.
Sistem je od sprejetja Uredbe EMAS III dostopen tudi neevropskim organizacijam ali evropskim družbam, ki delujejo v neevropskih državah.
On the latter issue, there is specific guidance on EU corporate registration, third country and global registration.
V zvezi z zadnjim vprašanjem obstajajo posebna navodila za registracijo družb na ravni EU in tretjih držav ter globalno registracijo.
‘ “Organisation” means a company, corporation, firm, enterprise, authority or institution, located inside or outside the Community, or part or combination thereof, whether incorporated or not, public or private, which has its own functions and administration.’
„ ‚Organizacija‘ pomeni družbo, korporacijo, podjetje, organ ali institucijo znotraj ali zunaj Skupnosti ali del ali kombinacijo teh, ki je bodisi združena ali ne, javna ali zasebna in ima lastne naloge in upravo.“
EMAS can be implemented in one, several or all sites belonging to private or public organisations in any sector of activity [15].
Sistem EMAS je mogoče izvajati na eni, več ali vseh lokacijah, ki pripadajo zasebnim ali javnim organizacijam v katerem koli sektorju dejavnosti [15].
The smallest entity that can be registered is a site.‘ “Site” means a distinct geographic location under the management control of an organisation covering activities, products and services, including all infrastructure, equipment and materials; a site is the smallest entity to be considered for registration.’
Lokacija je najmanjša enota, ki jo je mogoče registrirati.„ ‚Lokacija‘ pomeni določen geografski prostor pod upravljavskim nadzorom organizacije, ki zajema dejavnosti, proizvode in storitve, vključno z vso infrastrukturo, opremo in materiali; lokacija je najmanjša enota, ki se upošteva za registracijo.“
The general procedure for implementing EMAS can be summarised as follows:
Splošni postopek izvajanja sistema EMAS je mogoče povzeti na naslednji način: