natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 29 June 2011, the Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia (hereinafter Bolivia) deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations an instrument of denunciation of the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
Vlada Večnacionalne države Bolivije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Bolivija) je 29. junija 2011 pri Generalnemu sekretarju Združenih narodov deponirala listino o odpovedi Enotne konvencije Združenih narodov o mamilih.
The denunciation took effect for Bolivia on 1 January 2012.
Za Bolivijo je odpoved začela veljati 1. januarja 2012.
Bolivia has subsequently deposited an instrument to re-accede the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs with a reservation on the traditional use of coca leaves (in particular chewing and medicinal uses).
Bolivija je naknadno deponirala listino o ponovnem pristopu k Enotni konvenciji Združenih narodov o mamilih s pridržkom za tradicionalno uporabo listov koke (zlasti za žvečenje in medicinske namene).
This request for re-accession is currently under assessment by the State Parties.
Ta zahtevek za ponoven pristop trenutno ocenjujejo države pogodbenice.
Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 provides for the temporary withdrawal of the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance referred to in Section 2 of Chapter II of that Regulation, in particular if the national legislation no longer incorporates those conventions referred to in Annex III which have been ratified in fulfilment of the requirements of Article 8(1) and (2) or if that legislation is not effectively implemented.
Člen 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 732/2008 določa začasni preklic posebnega spodbujevalnega režima za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje iz oddelka 2 poglavja II navedene uredbe, zlasti če nacionalna zakonodaja ne vključuje več tistih konvencij iz Priloge III, ki so bile ratificirane zaradi izpolnjevanja zahtev iz člena 8(1) in (2), ali se navedena zakonodaja ne izvaja učinkovito.
This arrangement was granted to Bolivia by Commission Decision 2008/938/EC [2].
Ta režim je bil Boliviji odobren z Odločbo Komisije 2008/938/ES [2].
The UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs is listed in Annex III, Part B, point 24, to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008.
Enotna konvencija Združenih narodov o mamilih je na seznamu v točki 24 dela B Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 732/2008.
Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 provides that where the Commission receives information that may justify temporary withdrawal and where it considers that there are sufficient grounds for an investigation it shall inform the Generalised Preferences Committee and request consultations.
Člen 17(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 732/2008 določa, da kadar Komisija prejme informacije, ki bi lahko upravičile začasen preklic, in kadar meni, da obstajajo zadostni razlogi za preiskavo, obvesti Odbor za splošne preferenciale in zahteva posvetovanja.
Pursuant to Article 17(2), following consultations the Commission may decide to initiate an investigation
Po posvetovanju se Komisija v skladu s členom 17(2) lahko odloči za začetek preiskave.
It is necessary to analyse the effects of the denunciation of that Convention to determine whether they justify a temporary withdrawal of the special incentive arrangement.
Treba je analizirati učinke odpovedi navedene konvencije, da se določi, ali upravičujejo začasni preklic posebnega spodbujevalnega režima.
Therefore, there are sufficient grounds for an investigation.
Zato obstajajo zadostni razlogi za preiskavo.
Consultations with the Generalised Preferences Committee were held on 27 February 2012,
Posvetovanja z Odborom za splošne preferenciale so potekala 27. februarja 2012 –
The Commission shall initiate an investigation in order to establish whether the denunciation of the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs justifies a temporary withdrawal of the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance for products originating in Bolivia.
Komisija začne preiskavo, da ugotovi, ali odpoved Enotne konvencije Združenih narodov o mamilih upravičuje začasni preklic posebnega spodbujevalnega režima za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje za izdelke s poreklom iz Bolivije.
of 22 March 2012
z dne 22. marca 2012
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India
o zaključku protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Indije
On 13 May 2011, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India (‘the product concerned’).
(1) Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 13. maja 2011 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku), objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom v Unijo nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek).
On the same day, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India and commenced a separate investigation.
Komisija je istega dne z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom v Unijo nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Indije ter uvedla ločeno preiskavo.
The anti-dumping proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 31 March 2011 by the European Industrial Fasteners Institute EiFi (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof.
Protidampinški postopek je bil uveden na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 31. marca 2011 vložil Evropski zavod za industrijske pritrdilne elemente – EiFi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov v Uniji.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting thereof, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
Pritožba je vsebovala prima facie dokaze o dampingu navedenega izdelka in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo, da se upraviči začetek preiskave.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers, known importers, users known to be concerned, and the Indian authorities of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike, znane uvoznike, uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter indijske organe uradno obvestila o začetku postopka.
Sampling for exporting producers in India
Vzorčenje za proizvajalce izvoznike iz Indije
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers in India, sampling was provided for in the notice of initiation for the determination of dumping, in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Indije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za ugotavljanje dampinga v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers in India were requested to make themselves known within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to provide basic information on their export and domestic sales, their precise activities with regard to the production and sales of the product concerned and the names and activities of all their related companies involved in the production and sales of the product concerned during the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki iz Indije pozvani, da se javijo v 15 dneh od datuma začetka preiskave in zagotovijo osnovne informacije o svojem izvozu in domači prodaji, o svojih natančno opredeljenih dejavnostih v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka, ter imena in dejavnosti vseh povezanih družb, vključenih v proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka med 1. aprilom 2010 in 31. marcem 2011 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
In total, five exporting producers, including a group of related companies in India, provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample within the deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Potrebne informacije je predložilo skupaj pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključno s skupino povezanih družb iz Indije, in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec v navedenem roku iz obvestila o začetku.
These cooperating companies reported exports of the product concerned to the Union during the investigation period.
Te sodelujoče družbe so poročale o izvozu zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
The comparison between Eurostat import data and the volume of exports to the Union of the product concerned reported for the investigation period by the five cooperating companies revealed that the cooperation of Indian exporting producers was close to 100 %.
Primerjava med podatki Eurostata o uvozu in obsegom izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, ki ga je za obdobje preiskave navedlo pet sodelujočih družb, je pokazala, da je bilo sodelovanje indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov skoraj 100-odstotno.
Thus, the sample was chosen on the basis of the information submitted by these five exporting producers.
Zato je bil vzorec izbran na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložilo teh pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, a sample was selected based on the largest representative volume of exports of the product concerned to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
V skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe je bil vzorec izbran na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, ki ga je mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
On the basis of the information received from the exporting producers, the Commission selected a sample of three exporting producers having the largest volume of exports to the Union.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci izvozniki, je Komisija izbrala vzorec treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov z največjim obsegom izvoza v Unijo.
Based on the sampling information, the selected companies or groups accounted for 99 % of the total volume of exports to the Union of the product concerned in the IP reported by the cooperating exporting producers.
Na podlagi informacij o vzorčenju so izbrane družbe ali skupine predstavljale 99 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v OP, ki so ga navedli sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki.
It was therefore considered that such a sample would allow to limiting the investigation to a reasonable number of exporting producers which could be investigated within the time available while ensuring a high level of representativeness.
Zato se je štelo, da bo takšen vzorec omogočil omejitev preiskave na razumno število proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jih je mogoče preiskati v razpoložljivem času ob zagotavljanju visoke stopnje reprezentativnosti.
Selection of the sample of cooperating exporting producers in India
Izbira vzorca sodelujočih izvoznikov proizvajalcev iz Indije
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the parties concerned and the Indian authorities were consulted on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe je bilo z zadevnimi stranmi in indijskimi organi opravljeno posvetovanje o izbiri vzorca.
The two non-sampled exporting producers insisted to be also included in the sample.
Dva nevzorčena proizvajalca izvoznika sta želela biti vključena v vzorec.
However, in view of the representativity of the proposed sample, as mentioned in recital (8) above, it was concluded that it was not necessary to amend or enlarge the sample.
Vendar je bilo glede na reprezentativnost predlaganega vzorca, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (8), sklenjeno, da vzorca ni treba spremeniti ali razširiti.
Two co-operating exporting producers, which were not included in the sample requested individual examination and replied to the anti-dumping questionnaire within the time limit.
Dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika, ki nista bila vključena v vzorec, sta zaprosila za individualno preiskavo in poslala izpolnjen vprašalnik o protidampingu v določenem roku.
Given the conclusion that the present anti-dumping proceeding should be terminated for the reasons mentioned further below, the requests for individual examination were not further considered.
Glede na sklep, da je iz razlogov, navedenih v nadaljnjem besedilu, sedanji protidampinški postopek treba zaključiti, zahteve za individualno preiskavo niso bile nadalje obravnavane.
In view of the apparent large number of Union producers, sampling was provided for in the Notice of initiation for the determination of injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila proizvajalcev Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za ugotavljanje škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In the Notice of initiation the Commission announced that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku napovedala, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
This sample consisted of five companies, out of the 15 Union producers that were known prior to the initiation of the investigation, selected on the basis of their sales volume, size and geographic location in the Union.
Od 15 proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili znani pred začetkom preiskave, je ta vzorec zajemal pet družb, izbranih na podlagi njihovega obsega prodaje, velikosti in geografskega položaja v Uniji.
They represented 37 % of the total estimated Union production during the IP.
Predstavljale so 37 % celotne proizvodnje Unije v OP.
Interested parties were invited to consult the file and to comment on the appropriateness of this choice within 15 days of the date of publication of the Notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so bile pozvane, da pregledajo dokumentacijo in predložijo pripombe o ustreznosti te izbire v 15 dneh od datuma objave obvestila o začetku.
No interested party opposed to the proposed sample composed of five companies.
Nobena zainteresirana stran ni nasprotovala predlaganemu vzorcu, ki zajema pet družb.
Subsequently one of the five sampled Union producers withdrew its cooperation.
Eden od petih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije je svoje sodelovanje naknadno prekinil.
The remaining four sampled companies represented 31 % of the total estimated Union production during the IP.
Ostale štiri vzorčene družbe so predstavljale 31 % skupne ocenjene proizvodnje Unije v OP.
Hence the sample was considered to be representative of the Union industry.
Zato se je vzorec štel za reprezentativnega za industrijo Unije.
In view of the potentially large number of importers involved in the proceeding, sampling was envisaged for importers in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na potencialno veliko število uvoznikov, ki jih postopek zadeva, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno tudi vzorčenje za uvoznike v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
Two importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample within the deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Dva uvoznika sta zagotovila zahtevane informacije in se strinjala z vključitvijo v vzorec v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all other parties that made themselves known within the deadline set out in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem stranem, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim stranem, ki so se javile v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
Questionnaires were thus sent to the sampled exporting producers in India, the sampled Union producers, the cooperating importers in the Union and to all users known to be concerned by the investigation.
Vprašalniki so bili tako poslani vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Indiji, vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, sodelujočim uvoznikom v Uniji in vsem uporabnikom, za katere je znano, da jih preiskava zadeva.
Replies were received from the sampled exporting producers and four sampled Union producers.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so vrnili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki in štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije.
None of the importers or users replied to the questionnaire.
Nihče od uvoznikov ali uporabnikov ni odgovoril na vprašalnik.
The Commission sought and verified all the information provided by interested parties and deemed necessary for the determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani in so se ji zdele potrebne za določitev dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
One party claimed that one of the exporting producers made too many claims for confidentiality and did not provide a sufficiently meaningful public version of its questionnaire response.
Ena stran je trdila, da je en proizvajalec izvoznik prevečkrat vložil zahtevek za zaupnost in da ni zagotovil dovolj smiselne javne različice svojega izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
Hence, the information submitted by this company should not be taken into consideration and it should be treated as a non-cooperative party in the investigation.
Zato se informacije, ki jih je predložila ta družba, ne smejo upoštevati, družba pa se mora obravnavati kot nesodelujoča stran v preiskavi.
The non-confidential version of the reply of this exporting producer however, consisting of an initial reply and a completed version based on a deficiency letter, has once more been assessed and found to be sufficiently complete to qualify as a meaningful public reply.
Vendar je bila nezaupna različica odgovora tega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki zajema prvi odgovor in dopolnjeno različico na podlagi poziva k dopolnitvi, še enkrat ocenjena in ugotovljeno je bilo, da je dovolj celovita, da se lahko šteje za smiseln javni odgovor.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following parties:
Preveritveni obiski so bili izvedeni v prostorih naslednjih strani:
Inox Viti di Cattinori Bruno & C.s.n.c., Grumello del Monte, Italy;
Inox Viti di Cattinori Bruno & C.s.n.c., Grumello del Monte, Italija;
Bontempi Vibo S.p.A., Rodengo Saiano, Italy;
Bontempi Vibo S.p.A., Rodengo Saiano, Italija;
Ugivis S.A., Belley, France
Ugivis S.A., Belley, Francija;
Thane, Maharashtra
Thane, Maharaštra;
Raajratna Ventures Ltd., Ahmedabad, Gujarat
Raajratna Ventures Ltd., Ahmedabad, Gudžarat.
The product concerned is stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof (‘SSF’) originating in India, currently falling within CN codes 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 and 73181570.
Zadevni izdelek so nekateri pritrdilni elementi iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovi deli s poreklom iz Indije, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 in 73181570.
The product concerned and the product produced and sold on the domestic market of India as well as the product produced and sold on the Union market by the Union industry were found to have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imajo zadevni izdelek, izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Indije, ter izdelek, ki ga industrija Unije proizvaja in prodaja na trgu Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe.
For the determination of normal value in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first established whether the domestic sales of the like product of the sampled Indian exporting producers to independent customers were made in representative volumes, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of their total export sales volume to the Union during the IP.
Za določitev normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej ugotavljala, ali je bil obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka vzorčenih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov neodvisnim strankam reprezentativen, tj. ali je celoten obseg takšne prodaje predstavljal najmanj 5 % celotnega obsega prodaje za izvoz v Unijo med OP.
In the case of one sampled exporting producer it was found that it had no representative sales of the like product on the domestic market.
Za enega vzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika je bilo ugotovljeno, da njegova prodaja podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu ni bila reprezentativna.
For the sampled exporting producers with overall representative domestic sales, the Commission subsequently identified those product types sold on the domestic market by the exporting producers, which were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Union.
Za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike z v celoti reprezentativno domačo prodajo je Komisija naknadno opredelila tiste vrste izdelka, ki jih proizvajalci izvozniki prodajajo na domačem trgu, in ki so enaki ali neposredno primerljivi z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Unijo.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered as sufficiently representative when the volume of that product type sold on the domestic market to independent customers during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total volume of the comparable product type sold for export to the Union.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je obseg prodaje navedene vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OP predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste izdelka za izvoz v Unijo.
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of the companies concerned could be considered as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je naknadno preučila, ali se lahko domača prodaja zadevnih družb šteje za prodajo v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing for each product type the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the investigation period.
Pri tem je bil za vsako vrsto izdelka določen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v obdobju preiskave.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Če je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodanega po neto prodajni ceni, enaki ali višji od stroškov proizvodnje, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in če je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.