natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents, trade marks, designs, or other similar rights required to be deposited or registered, irrespective of whether the issue is raised by way of an action or as a defence, the courts of the Member State in which the deposit or registration has been applied for, has taken place or is under the terms of an instrument of the Union or an international convention deemed to have taken place.
v postopkih v zvezi z registracijo ali veljavnostjo patentov, znamk, modelov ali drugih podobnih pravic, ki jih je treba deponirati ali registrirati, ne glede na to, ali je bilo vprašanje postavljeno s tožbo ali z ugovorom, sodišča države članice, v kateri je bila vložena prijava za deponiranje ali registracijo, v kateri se je deponiranje ali registracija izvedla ali se na podlagi pravnega akta Unije ali mednarodne konvencije šteje za izvedeno.
Without prejudice to the jurisdiction of the European Patent Office under the Convention on the Grant of European Patents, signed at Munich on 5 October 1973, the courts of each Member State shall have exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of any European patent granted for that Member State;
Brez poseganja v pristojnost Evropskega patentnega urada v skladu s Konvencijo o podeljevanju evropskih patentov, ki je bila podpisana 5. oktobra 1973 v Münchnu, imajo sodišča vsake države članice izključno pristojnost v postopkih v zvezi z registracijo ali veljavnostjo katerega koli evropskega patenta, podeljenega za navedeno državo članico;
in proceedings concerned with the enforcement of judgments, the courts of the Member State in which the judgment has been or is to be enforced.
v postopkih v zvezi z izvršitvijo sodnih odločb sodišča države članice, v kateri je bila sodna odločba izvršena ali naj bi bila izvršena.
Prorogation of jurisdiction
Dogovor o pristojnosti
If the parties, regardless of their domicile, have agreed that a court or the courts of a Member State are to have jurisdiction to settle any disputes which have arisen or which may arise in connection with a particular legal relationship, that court or those courts shall have jurisdiction, unless the agreement is null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of that Member State.
Če so se stranke, ne glede na njihovo stalno prebivališče, dogovorile, da mora biti za spore, ki so ali ki bodo mogoče nastali v zvezi z določenim pravnim razmerjem, pristojno določeno sodišče ali sodišča določene države članice, je pristojno to sodišče oz. so pristojna sodišča te države članice, razen če je po pravu navedene države članice materialna veljavnost dogovora nična.
Such jurisdiction shall be exclusive unless the parties have agreed otherwise.
Ta pristojnost je izključna, razen če se stranke niso dogovorile drugače.
The agreement conferring jurisdiction shall be either:
Dogovor o pristojnosti je sklenjen:
in writing or evidenced in writing;
v pisni obliki ali potrjen v pisni obliki;
in a form which accords with practices which the parties have established between themselves; or
v obliki, ki je v skladu s prakso, ki je ustaljena med strankama, ali
in international trade or commerce, in a form which accords with a usage of which the parties are or ought to have been aware and which in such trade or commerce is widely known to, and regularly observed by, parties to contracts of the type involved in the particular trade or commerce concerned.
v mednarodni trgovini v skladu z mednarodnimi trgovskimi običaji, ki so znani strankam ali bi jim morali biti znani in ki so splošno priznani v mednarodni trgovini ter jih redno upoštevajo stranke pogodb istega tipa v okviru zadevne panoge.
Any communication by electronic means which provides a durable record of the agreement shall be equivalent to ‘writing’.
Vsaka komunikacija po elektronskih medijih, ki zagotavlja trajen zapis dogovora, je enakovredna „pisni obliki“.
The court or courts of a Member State on which a trust instrument has conferred jurisdiction shall have exclusive jurisdiction in any proceedings brought against a settlor, trustee or beneficiary, if relations between those persons or their rights or obligations under the trust are involved.
Sodišče ali sodišča države članice, ki jim je bila podeljena pristojnost na podlagi akta o ustanovitvi trusta, imajo izključno pristojnost v vseh postopkih zoper ustanovitelja, upravitelja ali upravičenca, če gre za razmerja med temi osebami ali njihove pravice ali obveznosti v okviru trusta.
Agreements or provisions of a trust instrument conferring jurisdiction shall have no legal force if they are contrary to Articles 15, 19 or 23, or if the courts whose jurisdiction they purport to exclude have exclusive jurisdiction by virtue of Article 24.
Dogovori ali določbe iz akta o ustanovitvi trusta, ki podeljujejo pristojnost, nimajo pravne veljave, če so v nasprotju s členi 15, 19 ali 23 ali če izključujejo pristojnost sodišč, ki imajo v skladu s členom 24 izključno pristojnost.
An agreement conferring jurisdiction which forms part of a contract shall be treated as an agreement independent of the other terms of the contract.
Dogovor o pristojnosti, ki je del pogodbe, se obravnava kot dogovor, ki je neodvisen od drugih pogodbenih pogojev.
The validity of the agreement conferring jurisdiction cannot be contested solely on the ground that the contract is not valid.
Veljavnosti dogovora o pristojnosti ni mogoče ugovarjati zgolj na podlagi trditve, da je pogodba neveljavna.
Apart from jurisdiction derived from other provisions of this Regulation, a court of a Member State before which a defendant enters an appearance shall have jurisdiction.
Poleg pristojnosti, ki izhaja iz drugih določb te uredbe, je pristojno tudi sodišče države članice, pred katerim se toženec spusti v postopek.
This rule shall not apply where appearance was entered to contest the jurisdiction, or where another court has exclusive jurisdiction by virtue of Article 24.
To pravilo pa ne velja, če se je spustil v postopek, da bi ugovarjal pristojnosti, ali če je v skladu s členom 24 izključno pristojno drugo sodišče.
In matters referred to in Sections 3, 4 or 5 where the policyholder, the insured, a beneficiary of the insurance contract, the injured party, the consumer or the employee is the defendant, the court shall, before assuming jurisdiction under paragraph 1, ensure that the defendant is informed of his right to contest the jurisdiction of the court and of the consequences of entering or not entering an appearance.
V zadevah iz oddelkov 3, 4 ali 5, v katerih je toženec zavarovalec, zavarovanec, upravičenec iz zavarovanja, oškodovanec, potrošnik ali delavec, sodišče pred prevzemom pristojnosti v skladu z odstavkom 1 zagotovi, da je bil tožencu zagotovljen pravni pouk o njegovi pravici, da ugovarja pristojnosti sodišča, in o posledicah spustitve ali nespustitve v postopek.
Examination as to jurisdiction and admissibility
Preizkus pristojnosti in dopustnosti
Where a court of a Member State is seised of a claim which is principally concerned with a matter over which the courts of another Member State have exclusive jurisdiction by virtue of Article 24, it shall declare of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction.
Če je sodišču države članice predložen zahtevek, katerega glavni predmet je zadeva, za katero so v skladu s členom 24 izključno pristojna sodišča druge države članice, se to sodišče po uradni dolžnosti izreče za nepristojno.
Where a defendant domiciled in one Member State is sued in a court of another Member State and does not enter an appearance, the court shall declare of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction unless its jurisdiction is derived from the provisions of this Regulation.
Če je toženec s stalnim prebivališčem v eni državi članici tožen v drugi državi članici in se ne spusti v postopek, se sodišče po uradni dolžnosti izreče za nepristojno, razen če pristojnost izhaja iz določb te uredbe.
The court shall stay the proceedings so long as it is not shown that the defendant has been able to receive the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his defence, or that all necessary steps have been taken to this end.
Sodišče prekine postopek za toliko časa, dokler se ne ugotovi, da je bilo tožencu omogočeno prejeti pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje pravočasno, da je lahko pripravil obrambo, ali da so bili storjeni vsi potrebni koraki v tej smeri.
Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents) [15] shall apply instead of paragraph 2 of this Article if the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document had to be transmitted from one Member State to another pursuant to that Regulation.
Člen 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 1393/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. novembra 2007 o vročanju sodnih in izvensodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah („vročanje pisanj“) [15] se uporabi namesto odstavka 2 tega člena, če je treba v skladu z navedeno uredbo poslati iz ene države članice v drugo državo članico pisanje o začetku postopka ali drugo enakovredno pisanje.
Where Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 is not applicable, Article 15 of the Hague Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters shall apply if the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document had to be transmitted abroad pursuant to that Convention.
Če se Uredba (ES) št. 1393/2007 ne uporablja, se uporabi člen 15 Haaške konvencije z dne 15. novembra 1965 o vročitvi sodnih in zunajsodnih listin v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v tujini, če je treba pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje poslati v tujino v skladu z navedeno konvencijo.
Lis pendens — related actions
Litispendenca in sorodne pravde
Without prejudice to Article 31(2), where proceedings involving the same cause of action and between the same parties are brought in the courts of different Member States, any court other than the court first seised shall of its own motion stay its proceedings until such time as the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established.
Če pred sodišči različnih držav članic tečejo postopki z istim zahtevkom med istima strankama, brez poseganja v člen 31(2), vsa sodišča razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, po uradni dolžnosti prekinejo svoje postopke, vse dokler se ne ugotovi pristojnost sodišča, ki je prvo začelo postopek.
In cases referred to in paragraph 1, upon request by a court seised of the dispute, any other court seised shall without delay inform the former court of the date when it was seised in accordance with Article 32.
V zadevah iz odstavka 1 katero koli sodišče, pred katerim teče postopek, na zahtevo sodišča, ki je začelo postopek v sporu, nemudoma obvesti slednje, kdaj je začelo postopek v skladu s členom 32.
Where the action in the court first seised is pending at first instance, any other court may also, on the application of one of the parties, decline jurisdiction if the court first seised has jurisdiction over the actions in question and its law permits the consolidation thereof.
Če teče pravda pred sodiščem, ki je prvo začelo postopek, na prvi stopnji, se lahko vsa druga sodišča na zahtevo ene od strank izrečejo za nepristojna, če je sodišče, ki je prvo začelo postopek, pristojno za odločanje v zadevnih pravdah in če pravo tega sodišča dovoljuje njihovo združitev.
Where actions come within the exclusive jurisdiction of several courts, any court other than the court first seised shall decline jurisdiction in favour of that court.
Če je za odločanje izključno pristojnih več sodišč, se vsa sodišča razen tistega, ki je prvo začelo postopek, izrečejo za nepristojna v korist prvega sodišča.
Without prejudice to Article 26, where a court of a Member State on which an agreement as referred to in Article 25 confers exclusive jurisdiction is seised, any court of another Member State shall stay the proceedings until such time as the court seised on the basis of the agreement declares that it has no jurisdiction under the agreement.
Če postopek začne sodišče države članice, ki mu je izključna pristojnost podeljena z dogovorom iz člena 25, sodišča druge države članice ne glede na člen 26 prekinejo postopek, dokler sodišče, ki je začelo postopek na podlagi dogovora, ne izjavi, da ni pristojno na podlagi dogovora.
Where the court designated in the agreement has established jurisdiction in accordance with the agreement, any court of another Member State shall decline jurisdiction in favour of that court.
Če se je sodišče, določeno v dogovoru, spoznalo za pristojno v skladu z dogovorom, se vsa sodišča druge države članice izrečejo za nepristojna v korist tega sodišča.
Paragraphs 2 and 3 shall not apply to matters referred to in Sections 3, 4 or 5 where the policyholder, the insured, a beneficiary of the insurance contract, the injured party, the consumer or the employee is the claimant and the agreement is not valid under a provision contained within those Sections.
Odstavka 2 in 3 se ne uporabljata za zadeve iz oddelkov 3, 4 ali 5, če je tožnik zavarovalec, zavarovanec, upravičenec iz zavarovanja, oškodovanec, potrošnik ali delavec in če dogovor ni veljaven na podlagi določb iz teh oddelkov.
For the purposes of this Section, a court shall be deemed to be seised:
Za namene tega oddelka se šteje, da je sodišče začelo postopek:
at the time when the document instituting the proceedings or an equivalent document is lodged with the court, provided that the claimant has not subsequently failed to take the steps he was required to take to have service effected on the defendant; or
v trenutku, ko je pisanje o začetku postopka ali enakovredno pisanje vloženo pri sodišču, če tožnik pozneje ni opustil dejanj, ki bi jih moral opraviti v zvezi z vročitvijo pisanja tožencu, ali
if the document has to be served before being lodged with the court, at the time when it is received by the authority responsible for service, provided that the claimant has not subsequently failed to take the steps he was required to take to have the document lodged with the court.
če je treba vročiti pisanje še pred vložitvijo na sodišče, v trenutku, ko ga prejme organ, ki je odgovoren za vročitev, če tožnik pozneje ni opustil dejanj, ki bi jih moral opraviti v zvezi z vložitvijo pisanja pri sodišču.
The authority responsible for service referred to in point (b) shall be the first authority receiving the documents to be served.
Organ, pristojen za vročitev, iz točke (b) je prvi organ, ki prejme pisanja, ki jih je treba vročiti.
The court, or the authority responsible for service, referred to in paragraph 1, shall note, respectively, the date of the lodging of the document instituting the proceedings or the equivalent document, or the date of receipt of the documents to be served.
Sodišče ali organ, ki je pristojen za vročitev iz odstavka 1, zabeleži datum vložitve pisanja o začetku postopka oziroma enakovredno pisanje ali datum prejema pisanj, ki jih je treba vročiti.
Where jurisdiction is based on Article 4 or on Articles 7, 8 or 9 and proceedings are pending before a court of a third State at the time when a court in a Member State is seised of an action involving the same cause of action and between the same parties as the proceedings in the court of the third State, the court of the Member State may stay the proceedings if:
Kadar pristojnost temelji na členu 4 ali na členih 7, 8 ali 9 in pred sodiščem tretje države teče postopek, ko je pred sodiščem države članice vložena tožba v zvezi z istim zahtevkom med istima strankama kot v postopku pred sodiščem v tretji državi, lahko sodišče države članice prekine postopek, če:
it is expected that the court of the third State will give a judgment capable of recognition and, where applicable, of enforcement in that Member State; and
se pričakuje, da bo sodišče tretje države izdalo sodno odločbo, ki jo je mogoče priznati in po potrebi izvršiti v navedeni državi članici;
the court of the Member State is satisfied that a stay is necessary for the proper administration of justice.
sodišče države članice meni, da je prekinitev potrebna zaradi ustreznega delovanja pravosodja.
The court of the Member State may continue the proceedings at any time if:
Sodišče države članice lahko kadar koli nadaljuje postopek, če:
the proceedings in the court of the third State are themselves stayed or discontinued;
je postopek pred sodiščem tretje države prekinjen ali ustavljen;
it appears to the court of the Member State that the proceedings in the court of the third State are unlikely to be concluded within a reasonable time; or
sodišče države članice meni, da postopek pred sodiščem tretje države verjetno ne bo končan v razumnem roku, ali
the continuation of the proceedings is required for the proper administration of justice.
je nadaljevanje postopka potrebno zaradi ustreznega delovanja pravosodja.
The court of the Member State shall dismiss the proceedings if the proceedings in the court of the third State are concluded and have resulted in a judgment capable of recognition and, where applicable, of enforcement in that Member State.
Sodišče države članice ustavi postopek, če se je postopek pred sodiščem tretje države končal in je bila v njem izdana sodna odločba, ki jo je mogoče priznati in po potrebi izvršiti v navedeni državi članici.
The court of the Member State shall apply this Article on the application of one of the parties or, where possible under national law, of its own motion.
Sodišče države članice uporablja ta člen na zahtevo ene od strank ali, kadar je to mogoče po nacionalnem pravu, po uradni dolžnosti.
Where jurisdiction is based on Article 4 or on Articles 7, 8 or 9 and an action is pending before a court of a third State at the time when a court in a Member State is seised of an action which is related to the action in the court of the third State, the court of the Member State may stay the proceedings if:
Kadar pristojnost temelji na členu 4 ali na členih 7, 8 ali 9 in pred sodiščem tretje države teče postopek, ko je pred sodiščem države članice vložena tožba, ki je povezana s tožbo pred sodiščem v tretji državi, lahko sodišče države članice prekine postopek, če:
it is expedient to hear and determine the related actions together to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings;
se zdita skupna obravnava sorodnih tožb in odločanje o njih smiselni, da bi se s tem izognili nevarnosti nezdružljivih sodnih odločb, ki bi izhajale iz ločenih postopkov;
it appears to the court of the Member State that there is no longer a risk of irreconcilable judgments;
sodišče države članice meni, da ni več nevarnosti nezdružljivih sodnih odločb;
The court of the Member State may dismiss the proceedings if the proceedings in the court of the third State are concluded and have resulted in a judgment capable of recognition and, where applicable, of enforcement in that Member State.
Sodišče države članice lahko ustavi postopek, če se je postopek pred sodiščem tretje države končal in je bila v njem izdana sodna odločba, ki jo je mogoče priznati in po potrebi izvršiti v navedeni državi članici sodišča.
Application may be made to the courts of a Member State for such provisional, including protective, measures as may be available under the law of that Member State, even if the courts of another Member State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter.
Pri sodiščih države članice se lahko vloži zahteva za začasne ukrepe, vključno z ukrepi zavarovanja, ki jih predvideva pravo te države članice, tudi v primeru, ko so za odločanje o glavni stvari pristojna sodišča druge države članice.
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT
PRIZNANJE IN IZVRŠITEV
A judgment given in a Member State shall be recognised in the other Member States without any special procedure being required.
Sodna odločba, izdana v državi članici, se v drugih državah članicah prizna, ne da bi bilo potrebno za priznanje začeti kakršen koli poseben postopek.
Any interested party may, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Subsection 2 of Section 3, apply for a decision that there are no grounds for refusal of recognition as referred to in Article 45.
Vsaka zainteresirana stranka lahko v skladu s postopkom iz pododdelka 2 oddelka 3 zahteva odločitev, da ni razlogov za zavrnitev priznanja iz člena 45.
If the outcome of proceedings in a court of a Member State depends on the determination of an incidental question of refusal of recognition, that court shall have jurisdiction over that question.
Če je izid postopka pred sodiščem države članice odvisen od odločitve o zavrnitvi priznanja kot o predhodnem vprašanju, je za to vprašanje pristojno to sodišče.
A party who wishes to invoke in a Member State a judgment given in another Member State shall produce:
Stranka, ki želi v državi članici uveljaviti sodno odločbo, izdano v drugi državi članici, predloži:
a copy of the judgment which satisfies the conditions necessary to establish its authenticity; and
izvod sodne odločbe, ki izpolnjuje pogoje, potrebne za potrditev njegove verodostojnosti, in
the certificate issued pursuant to Article 53.
potrdilo, izdano v skladu s členom 53.
The court or authority before which a judgment given in another Member State is invoked may, where necessary, require the party invoking it to provide, in accordance with Article 57, a translation or a transliteration of the contents of the certificate referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1.
Po potrebi lahko sodišče ali organ, pred katerim se uveljavlja sodna odločba, izdana v drugi državi članici, od stranke, ki uveljavlja sodno odločbo, zahteva, da v skladu s členom 57 predloži prevod ali transliteracijo vsebine potrdila iz točke (b) odstavka 1.
The court or authority may require the party to provide a translation of the judgment instead of a translation of the contents of the certificate if it is unable to proceed without such a translation.
Sodišče ali organ lahko namesto prevoda vsebine potrdila zahteva prevod sodne odločbe, če ne more nadaljevati dela brez prevoda sodne odločbe.
The court or authority before which a judgment given in another Member State is invoked may suspend the proceedings, in whole or in part, if:
Sodišče ali drug organ, pred katerim se uveljavlja sodna odločba, izdana v drugi državi članici, lahko v celoti ali delno začasno prekine postopek, če:
the judgment is challenged in the Member State of origin; or
se sodna odločba izpodbija v državi članici izvora; ali
an application has been submitted for a decision that there are no grounds for refusal of recognition as referred to in Article 45 or for a decision that the recognition is to be refused on the basis of one of those grounds.
je bila vložena zahteva za odločitev, da ni razlogov za zavrnitev priznanja iz člena 45 ali za odločitev o zavrnitvi priznanja na podlagi enega od teh razlogov.
Enforcement
Izvršitev
A judgment given in a Member State which is enforceable in that Member State shall be enforceable in the other Member States without any declaration of enforceability being required.
Sodna odločba, ki je izdana v državi članici in je izvršljiva v tej državi članici, je izvršljiva tudi v drugih državah članicah, ne da bi jo bilo treba razglasiti za izvršljivo.
An enforceable judgment shall carry with it by operation of law the power to proceed to any protective measures which exist under the law of the Member State addressed.
Izvršljiva sodna odločba po samem zakonu vključuje pooblastilo za ukrepe zavarovanja, ki so predpisani z zakonodajo zaprošene države članice.
Subject to the provisions of this Section, the procedure for the enforcement of judgments given in another Member State shall be governed by the law of the Member State addressed.
Ob upoštevanju določb tega oddelka postopek izvršitve sodnih odločb, izdanih v drugi državi članici, ureja pravo zaprošene države članice.