natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, the representativity of the results of this study is questionable.
Zato je reprezentativnost rezultatov te študije vprašljiva.
The party has not brought any other evidence in support of its claim.
Stran ni predložila nobenih drugih dokazov v podporo svoji trditvi.
The investigation has confirmed that all types of bicycles, as defined above, have the same basic physical and technical characteristics.
Preiskava je potrdila, da imajo vse vrste koles, kot so določene zgoraj, enake temeljne fizične in tehnične lastnosti.
In particular, it was found that the use of different raw materials did not have an impact on the basic characteristics of a bicycle.
Zlasti je bilo ugotovljeno, da uporaba različnih surovin ni vplivala na osnovne lastnosti kolesa.
Although steel and aluminium have some different technical properties like weight, the basic characteristics of the bicycles made of steel and aluminium remain similar.
Čeprav imata jeklo in aluminij nekaj različnih tehničnih značilnosti, kot na primer teža, imajo kolesa, izdelana iz jekla in aluminija, podobne osnovne lastnosti.
Likewise, there was no specific evidence provided by the party that bicycles made of steel on one hand and those made of aluminium on the other hand had indeed different basic physical and technical characteristics.
Podobno zadevna stran ni predložila nobenega posebnega dokaza, da imajo kolesa, izdelana iz jekla, in kolesa, izdelana iz aluminija, dejansko različne osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti.
Regarding the specific application, use and consumer perception, the current investigation has confirmed that all bicycles have the same basic applications and perform essentially the same function.
Glede specifične namembnosti, uporabe in potrošnikovega dojemanja je sedanja preiskava potrdila, da imajo vsa kolesa enako temeljno namembnost in izvajajo v bistvu isto funkcijo.
While it is true that different categories are in principal intended to meet different end users requirements, end-users will regularly put a bicycle in a particular category to a variety of uses.
Medtem ko naj bi različne kategorije načeloma izpolnjevale različne zahteve končnih uporabnikov, končni uporabniki kolo posamezne kategorije izkoristijo za različne rabe.
There are consequently no clear dividing lines based on end-users’ use and consumers’ perceptions of different categories.
Torej ni jasnih razmejitev med rabo za končnega uporabnika in potrošnikovimi dojemanji različnih kategorij.
Furthermore, Union producers themselves often make no distinction among the bicycles classified in different categories with regard to production, distribution and accounting.
Poleg tega proizvajalci Unije sami glede proizvodnje, distribucije ali računovodstva pogosto ne delajo razlik med kolesi, razvrščenimi v različne kategorije.
Indeed, they often have a similar manufacturing process for all categories of bicycles.
Za vse kategorije koles pogosto dejansko uporabljajo podoben proizvodni postopek.
In addition, the bicycles in the various categories are sold through similar distribution channels such as specialised retailers, sport chains and mass merchandisers on the Union market.
Prav tako se kolesa različnih kategorij na trgu Unije prodajajo prek podobnih distribucijskih kanalov, kot so specializirani prodajalci, športne verige in trgovci na veliko.
One party raised the point that the current investigation covers two CN codes as stated in recital 38 while the previous investigation stated in recital 5 covered three CN codes, i.e. ex87120010, 87120030 and ex87120080.
Ena stran je poudarila, da sedanja preiskava zajema dve kodi KN, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 38, medtem ko je prejšnja preiskava, navedena v uvodni izjavi 5 zajemala tri kode KN, tj. ex87120010, 87120030 in ex87120080.
In this regard, it is noted that the changing of the codes was due to amendments to the Combined Nomenclature imposed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 with effect as from 1 January 2012 [15].
V zvezi s tem se je ugotovilo, da so se te kode spremenile zaradi sprememb kombinirane nomenklature, uvedenih z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1006/2011 z začetkom veljavnosti od 1. januarja 2012 [15].
In this context, the party claimed that bicycles without ball bearings should not be considered a single product with the bicycles with ball bearings.
V zvezi s tem je zadevna stran trdila, da se kolesa brez krogličnih ležajev in kolesa s krogličnimi ležaji ne bi smela šteti za en sam izdelek.
However, the investigation showed that bicycles with ball bearings and bicycles without ball bearing share the same technical characteristics and uses.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da imajo kolesa s krogličnimi ležaji in kolesa brez krogličnih ležajev enake tehnične lastnosti in rabo.
Furthermore, the party has not substantiated its claim with any supporting evidence and therefore, the claim is rejected.
Poleg tega zadevna stran svoje trditve ni utemeljila z nobenimi podpornimi dokazi, zato se trditev zavrne.
Moreover, the party argued that there is a significant difference in the average import prices as recorded in Eurostat between the two CN codes covering the product concerned.
Nadalje je stran trdila, da je po podatkih Eurostata v povprečnih uvoznih cenah med dvema kodama KN, ki zajemata zadevni izdelek, pomembna razlika.
In this regards, it is highlighted that as stated in recital 157 below due to the product mix, the average price as recorded in Eurostat can only serve as an indicator of price trends, but is not useful when comparing sales prices between various countries and the Union.
V zvezi s tem je poudarjeno, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 157, da je zaradi prodajnega programa povprečna cena po podatkih Eurostata lahko le kazalec cenovnih trendov, ni pa uporabna pri primerjanju prodajnih cen med različnimi državami in Unijo.
After the disclosure one party reiterated its claim that the different types of bicycles covered by the scope of this investigation are not like products and claimed that it had submitted positive evidence in support of the differences in raw materials, physical characteristics, technological features, end-uses that allegedly exist among the different type of bicycles.
Po razkritju je ena stran ponovila svojo trditev, da različne vrste koles, zajete v obsegu te preiskave, niso podobni izdelki, in je nadalje trdila, da je predložila pozitivne dokaze o domnevnih razlikah med različnimi vrstami koles, in sicer kar zadeva surovine, fizične lastnosti, tehnološke lastnosti in končne uporabnike.
In this respect, it should be noted that the positive evidence that the party claims to have submitted is actually the study assessed by the Commission in recital 42.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so pozitivni dokazi, ki jih je družba domnevno predložila, v bistvu študija, ki jo je ocenila Komisija v uvodni izjavi 42.
After due assessment, the Commission concluded that the representativity of the results of this study was questionable for the reasons mentioned in recital 42.
Komisija je po ustrezni oceni sklenila, da je bila reprezentativnost rezultatov te študije vprašljiva iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 42.
The parties claimed that children’s bicycles defined by the party as bicycles with a size of wheel less than and including 16 inch should be excluded from the product scope of the investigation.
Strani so trdile, da bi bilo treba otroška kolesa, ki jih je zadevna stran opredelila kot kolesa, katerih kolo je veliko 16 palcev ali manj, izključiti iz obsega izdelka v preiskavi.
These claims were based on the assumption that in particular duration of uses and simplicity in characteristics clearly divided these bicycles from other types of bicycles falling within the scope of the current investigation.
Te trditve so temeljile na domnevi, da se ta kolesa zlasti zaradi trajanja uporabe in enostavnih značilnosti ločijo od drugih vrst koles, ki jih zajema sedanja preiskava.
However, these claims were deemed insufficient to exclude bicycles with a size of wheel less than and including 16 inch from the definition of the product concerned because they were not substantiated with sufficient evidence showing that in this investigation a clear dividing line could be drawn between bicycles with a size of wheel less than and including 16 inch and other bicycles types within the scope of the investigation.
Vendar so se navedene trditve zdele nezadostne za izključitev koles, katerih kolo je veliko 16 palcev ali manj, iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka, saj niso bile podprte z zadostnimi dokazi o tem, da se lahko v okviru obsega te preiskave določi jasna ločnica med kolesi, katerih kolo je veliko 16 palcev ali manj, in drugimi vrstami koles.
In fact, to the contrary it was found that the essential physical and technical characteristics of the bicycles with a size of wheel less than and including 16 inch which were common to those of the product concerned — a human-powered, pedal-driven vehicle having more than one wheel attached to a frame — were much more important than any differences (i.e. essentially size of the wheel).
Pravzaprav je bilo ugotovljeno nasprotno, in sicer, da so osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti koles, katerih kolo je veliko 16 palcev ali manj, ki so enake lastnostim zadevnega izdelka, tj. vozila s pogonom na pedala, ki ga poganja sila mišic in je na njegov okvir pritrjeno več kot eno kolo, pomembnejše od katerih koli drugih razlik (tj. predvsem velikosti kolesa).
Furthermore, it appeared that production, sales channels and consumer service were not fundamentally different from other bicycle types under investigation.
Poleg tega se je zdelo, da se proizvodnja, prodajne poti in storitve za potrošnike bistveno ne razlikujejo od drugih vrst koles v preiskavi.
Just the mere fact that bicycles with a size of wheel less than and including 16 inch form a distinctive product sub-group within the scope of the product concerned does not warrant the exclusion from the product scope.
Samo dejstvo, da so kolesa, katerih kolo je veliko 16 palcev ali manj, posebna podskupina izdelka v okviru obsega zadevnega izdelka, še ne utemeljuje izključitve iz obsega izdelka.
Indeed, it was found that there is no clear dividing line between bicycles with a size of wheel less than and including 16 inch and the product concerned, but that there is rather a large overlap regarding the definition of the product concerned, notably that it is a human-powered, pedal-driven vehicle having more than one wheel used essentially for transportation and spot.
Dejansko je bilo ugotovljeno, da med kolesi, katerih kolo je veliko 16 palcev ali manj, in zadevnim izdelkom ni jasne ločnice, temveč se pri opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka lastnosti v veliki meri prekrivajo, in sicer da gre za vozilo s pogonom na pedala, ki ga poganja sila mišic in je na njegov okvir pritrjeno več kot eno kolo ter se uporablja zlasti za prevoz in športne aktivnosti.
In this regard, the investigation revealed that one of the cooperating Chinese exporting producers was actually exporting to the Union bicycles with a wheel size of 12 inch which were not considered necessarily bicycles for children but they were actually folding bicycles used by adults for which storage was an important feature of the bicycles.
V zvezi s tem je preiskava pokazala, da je eden od sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov dejansko izvažal v Unijo kolesa, katerih kolo je bilo veliko 12 palcev, in se niso nujno štela za otroška kolesa, saj so bila dejansko zložljiva kolesa, ki so jih uporabljali odrasli, ki jim je pri kolesu pomembno, da ga lahko shranijo.
Therefore the request to exclude bicycles with a size of wheel less than and including 16 inch from the product scope of the investigation is rejected.
Zato se zahteva, da se kolesa, katerih kolo je veliko 16 palcev ali manj, izključijo iz obsega izdelka v preiskavi, zavrne.
Bicycles produced and sold by the Union industry on the Union market, those produced and sold on the analogue country market and those imported into the Union market originating in the PRC have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and the same uses and are, therefore, considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Kolesa, ki jih proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije na trgu Unije, tista, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu primerljive države, in tista, ki so uvožena na trg Unije s poreklom iz LRK, imajo enake fizične in tehnične lastnosti ter enake rabe in se zato obravnavajo kot enaka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
MET assessment
1.1 Ocena TGO
Business decisions are made in response to market signals, without significant State interference, and costs reflect market values,
poslovne odločitve so posledica tržnih razmer, brez občutnega vmešavanja države, stroški pa izražajo tržne vrednosti,
Firms have one clear set of basic accounting records, which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards (IAS) and are applied for all purposes,
družbe imajo en jasen sklop osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno revidirajo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi („MRS“) in se uporabljajo za vse namene,
There are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system,
večjih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva, ni,
In the present investigation, all exporting groups that initially cooperated with the investigation requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadlines.
V sedanji preiskavi so vse skupine izvoznikov, ki so prvotno sodelovale v preiskavi, v navedenih rokih zahtevale TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in poslale izpolnjen obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
For all exporting groups that initially cooperated with the investigation, the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified information submitted in the MET claim at the premises of the groups in question.
Komisija je za vse skupine izvoznikov, ki so prvotno sodelovale v preiskavi, zahtevala vse potrebne informacije in v prostorih zadevnih skupin preverila informacije, ki so jih predložile v zahtevku za TGO.
The reply of one group, Giant China, was considered as being significantly deficient as it did not include all the required information on the structure of the group, notwithstanding the Commission’s efforts to obtain the necessary information from the group.
Odgovor ene skupine, tj. Giant China, je bil znatno pomanjkljiv, saj kljub prizadevanjem Komisije, da bi od te skupine pridobila potrebne informacije, ni vključeval zahtevanih informacij o sestavi skupine.
As required by Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, Giant China was informed of the likely application of facts available to it and invited to provide comments.
Kakor zahteva člen 18(1) osnovne uredbe, je bila Giant China obveščena o verjetni uporabi razpoložljivih dejstev in pozvana k predložitvi pripomb.
As Giant China, however, refused to provide the Commission with the necessary information, Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation was applied and the claim for MET was rejected.
Ker je Giant China zavrnila predložitev potrebnih informacij Komisiji, je bil uporabljen člen 18(1) osnovne uredbe in zahtevek za TGO je bil zavrnjen.
Furthermore, the investigation revealed that MET could not be granted to any of the Chinese company groups as none of them fulfilled all the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, for the following reasons:
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da TGO ni mogoče odobriti nobeni od skupin kitajskih družb, saj nobena ni izpolnjevala vseh meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe iz naslednjih razlogov.
All cooperating exporting groups failed to demonstrate that they fulfil Criterion 1 because of State interference in decisions concerning the main raw materials (steel & aluminium).
Nobena od sodelujočih skupin izvoznikov ni dokazala, da izpolnjuje merilo 1 zaradi vmešavanja države v odločitve glede glavnih surovin (jeklo in aluminij).
The cost of steel and aluminium for the cooperating exporting groups represents at least around 20 % to 25 % of the cost of production of the product concerned.
Stroški jekla in aluminija za sodelujoče skupine izvoznikov znašajo najmanj okrog 20–25 % stroškov proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka.
Many companies are fully vertically integrated, meaning that they purchase the aluminium ingots or steel to produce tubes which then are used to produce frames/forks and finally the bicycles.
Veliko družb je povsem vertikalno integriranih, kar pomeni, da kupujejo aluminijaste ingote ali jeklo za proizvajanje cevi, ki se nato uporabijo za proizvodnjo okvirov/vilic in nazadnje za kolesa.
The investigation demonstrated that the three cooperating Chinese groups of exporting producers acquired the steel and aluminium used for the production of the product concerned on the Chinese domestic market.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so tri sodelujoče skupine kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov jeklo in aluminij, ki se uporabljata za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka, pridobile na kitajskem domačem trgu.
Prices are based on the quotation of aluminium in the State-controlled Shanghai Non-ferrous Metal Exchange market (‘the Exchange’ or ‘SHFE’).
Cene temeljijo na kotaciji aluminija na šanghajski borzi barvnih kovin pod nadzorom države („borza“ ali „SHFE“).
Several rules governing the functioning of the Exchange contribute to low volatility and prices which do not reflect the market value at the SHFE: daily price fluctuations are limited to 4 % above or below the settlement price of the previous trading day, trading happens at a low frequency (until the 15th day of each month), futures contracts are limited to a duration of up to 12 months, and transaction fees are charged by both the Exchange and brokers.
Več pravil, ki urejajo delovanje borze, prispeva k temu, da so na SHFE prisotna majhna nihanja in cene, ki ne izražajo tržne vrednosti: dnevna nihanja cen so omejena na 4 % nad ali pod poravnalne cene predhodnega trgovalnega dne, trgovanje poteka na nizki stopnji pogostosti (do 15. dne vsakega meseca), terminske pogodbe so omejene na največ 12 mesecev, transakcijske pristojbine pa zaračunavajo borza in posredniki.
Moreover, as concerns SHFE transactions, physical deliveries can only take place in an approved warehouse within the PRC, unlike international exchanges, where delivery can take place worldwide.
Poleg tega se lahko fizične izročitve v zvezi s transakcijami na SHFE izvedejo le v odobrenem skladišču na ozemlju LRK, medtem ko so na mednarodnih borzah izročitve možne po celem svetu.
As a consequence, arbitrage with the worldwide benchmark, the London Metals Exchange (‘LME’) or other markets is practically not possible and the exchange works in isolation from other world markets.
Posledično arbitraža v svetovnem merilu z Londonsko borzo kovin (London Metals Exchange – „LME“) ali drugimi trgi praktično ni mogoča in izmenjava poteka ločeno od drugih svetovnih trgov.
Therefore, an arbitrage among these markets cannot take place.
Zato arbitraža med temi trgi ni mogoča.
During the RIP primary aluminium prices were around 7 % lower on the SHFE (excluding VAT) as compared to the LME (also excluding VAT), compared on a spot price basis.
V OPP so bile cene primarnega aluminija okrog 7 % nižje na SHFE (brez DDV) v primerjavi z LME (tudi brez DDV) na podlagi cene na kraju samem.
The State also interferes with the price setting mechanisms in the SHFE as it is both a seller and a purchaser, via the State Reserve Bureau and other State Bodies, of primary aluminium.
Država se vmešava tudi v mehanizme določanja cen SHFE, saj je prodajalec in kupec primarnega aluminija prek urada za državne rezerve ali drugih državnih organov.
In addition, the State sets daily price limits via the rules of the SHFE which have been approved by the State Regulator, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (‘the CSRC’).
Poleg tega država preko pravil SHFE dnevno določa omejitve cen, ki jih odobri državni regulativni organ, tj. kitajska nadzorna komisija za vrednostne papirje (China Securities Regulatory Commission – „CSRC“).
The PRC supports the processing of aluminium products by granting a partial VAT refund on the export of many aluminium products (for bicycles, the rate is 15 %); in case of exports of primary aluminium instead, there is no refund.
LRK podpira obdelovanje izdelkov iz aluminija z odobritvami delnega vračila DDV na izvoz več izdelkov iz aluminija (za kolesa je stopnja 15 %); v primeru izvoza primarnega aluminija vračila ni.
This is an incentive for Chinese industry to further process aluminium and has a direct bearing on the availability and price of primary aluminium on the domestic market.
To je spodbuda kitajski industriji za nadaljnjo predelavo aluminija in neposredno vpliva na razpoložljivost in ceno primarnega aluminija na domačem trgu.
In addition, the investigation demonstrated that primary aluminium for export is subject to a 17 % tax, while no export tax is applied on exports of bicycles.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je na primarni aluminij, ki se izvaža, določen 17-odstotni davek, medtem ko na izvoz koles izvozni davek ni določen.
This strengthens the finding of interference of the Chinese State on the domestic market of aluminium.
To še potrjuje pravilnost ugotovitve o vmešavanju kitajske države na domačem trgu aluminija.
These tools have a downward impact on domestic prices encouraging domestic industry to manufacture finished goods incorporating aluminium (such as the product concerned) for both the domestic and export markets.
Ta orodja imajo negativni učinek na domače cene, saj domačo industrijo spodbujajo k proizvajanju končnih izdelkov, ki vsebujejo aluminij (kot je zadevni izdelek), za domači in izvozni trg.
A further distortion by the Chinese State is in the form of interventions in the market by the State Reserves Bureau (‘SRB’) which is part of the National Development Reform Commission (‘NDRC’).
Nadaljnje izkrivljanje, ki ga kitajska država povzroča, je v obliki intervencij na trgu prek urada državnih rezerv (State Reserves Bureau – „SRB“), ki je del nacionalne komisije za razvojne reforme (National Development Reform Commission – „NDRC“).
At the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009 the SRB started buying up stocks of primary aluminium from Chinese aluminium smelters, in order to stimulate the price of the commodity.
Ob koncu leta 2008 in na začetku leta 2009 je SRB od kitajskih talilnic aluminija začel kupovati zaloge primarnega aluminija, da bi spodbudil ceno tega blaga.
The SRB sold primary aluminium back onto the market such as at the start of November 2010 as reported by Bloomberg [16].
SRB je primarni aluminij prodajal nazaj na trg, kot na primer na začetku novembra 2010, kakor je poročal Bloomberg [16].
The Xinhua News Agency reported the stockpiling measures in December 2008, explaining that it was planned to accumulate 300000 tonnes of aluminium at prices which were 10 % higher than the market price in a measure designed to prop up prices [17].
Tiskovna agencija Xinhua je decembra 2008 poročala o ukrepih kopičenja in pojasnila, da se načrtuje nakopičenje 300000 ton aluminija po cenah, ki so 10 % višje od tržne cene, da bi s tem ukrepom podprli cene [17].
The SRB stockpiling plan involved buying from several Chinese smelters although around half was to be bought from the Aluminium Corporation of China Ltd The above demonstrates that the Chinese State has a primary role in the setting of prices of primary aluminium and that it interferes in the market.
Načrt kopičenja s strani SRB je vključeval nakup od več kitajskih talilnic, čeprav naj bi približno polovico kupili od družbe Aluminium Corporation of China Ltd. Zgornje ugotovitve kažejo, da ima kitajska država glavno vlogo pri določanju cen primarnega aluminija in da se vmešava v trg.