natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Takes note that the Court of Auditors notes that the Commission has not made an in depth assessment on the potential impact of the liberalisation of planting rights scheduled for 2018 at the latest, and considers that such an assessment is necessary to establish an estimate of the balance between supply and demand in the wine sector;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča, da Komisija ni pripravila natančne ocene morebitnega vpliva liberalizacije pravic do posaditve, ki naj bi se zgodila najpozneje leta 2018, in meni, da je ta ocena potrebna za napoved ravnovesja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem v vinarskem sektorju;
Takes note of the Court of Auditors’ concerns that the Union financed the grubbing-up measure in order to reduce the surplus of wine, while in certain cases, the restructuring and conversion measure led to some increases in vineyard yields;
je seznanjen s pomisleki Računskega sodišča glede dejstva, da je Unija financirala ukrep izkrčitve, da bi zmanjšala presežek vina, ukrepi prestrukturiranja in preusmeritve pa so v nekaterih primerih povzročili večji vinogradniški donos;
takes the view, however, that greater yields may make the wines more competitive, but strongly encourages the Commission to ensure that an appropriate strategy is in place to avoid unbalances;
vendar meni, da bi povečanje donosa lahko izboljšalo konkurenčnost vin, a odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v prihodnosti zagotovi, da bo na voljo ustrezna strategija, ki bo preprečila neravnovesja;
Fully endorses that the grubbing-up of some modernised vineyards should have been avoided by clarifying existing provisions, so that the vast possibilities of interpretation would have been avoided and established additional eligibility criteria linked to the vineyard itself and not only to the farmer;
se v celoti strinja s tem, da bi se bilo treba izogniti izkrčitvi nekaterih posodobljenih vinogradov, in sicer s pojasnitvijo veljavnih določb, da bi preprečili možnost različnih razlag, in z vzpostavitvijo dodatnih meril za upravičenost, povezanih z vinogradom, ne pa samo z vinogradnikom;
Is of the opinion that the Commission should review the restructuring measures to reinforce their effectiveness and maintain measures from the previous programme that proved successful in order to boost the sector competitiveness;
meni, da bi morala Komisija pregledati ukrepe prestrukturiranja ter povečati njihovo učinkovitost, da bi povečala konkurenčnost sektorja, in ohraniti tiste, ki so bili uspešni v prejšnjem programu;
expects the Commission to ensure that the Member States’ national programmes and the restructuring and conversion measures are in line with the objective of the reform, especially the Single Payment Scheme;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija zagotovila, da bodo nacionalni programi držav članic skladni s cilji reforme in z ukrepi za prestrukturiranje in preusmeritev, zlasti glede sheme enotnega plačila;
furthermore, asks the Commission to improve the current provisions to enable farmers to better adapt to market signals and better match the supply to the products demanded;
poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša sedanje določbe, da bi kmetom omogočila, da se bolje prilagodijo tržnim signalom in bolje uskladijo ponudbo s proizvodi, po katerih je povpraševanje;
Calls on the Commission to promote measures to safeguard the Union’s best winemaking traditions, which essentially entails ensuring socioeconomic cohesion and protecting the environment and landscape in many of the rural areas in which they operate;
poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja ukrepe za zaščito najboljših tradicij proizvodnje vina v Uniji, od katerih so v veliki meri odvisni socialna in ekonomska kohezija ter zaščita okolja in krajin številnih podeželskih območij, kjer se uporabljajo;
Considers that the Commission should establish a regularly updated estimate of the balance between supply and demand in the wine sector based on statistical analysis of the sector variables, taking into account positive output effects of restructuring and conversion measures;
meni, da bi morala Komisija na podlagi statistične analize pripraviti in redno posodabljati oceno ravnovesja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem v vinarskem sektorju, pri tem pa upoštevati pozitivne učinke ukrepov za prestrukturiranje in preusmeritev na obseg proizvodnje;
believes that on the basis of that estimate, it should have determined the targeted area for the grubbing-up measure and is of the opinion that in the future, it should evaluate whether the improvement of any other measures is necessary to address possible imbalances on the basis of that estimate;
meni, da bi morala na podlagi te ocene opredeliti ciljno območje za ukrepe izkrčitve in v prihodnje pretehtati, ali bi bilo treba izboljšati preostale ukrepe za obravnavo morebitnega neravnovesja;
Insists on the need to realise an in-depth impact study assessment of the planting rights liberalisation, according to the Court of Auditors’ recommendation;
vztraja pri tem, da je treba v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča opraviti poglobljeno študijo z oceno učinka liberalizacije pravic do posaditve;
asks the Commission to evaluate the potential consequences of the elimination of this regime in order to adopt the most convenient decisions to guarantee the balance of the wine market;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni morebitne posledice odprave tega režima, da bi bilo mogoče sprejeti najustreznejše odločitve, s katerimi bi zagotovili uravnoteženost trga z vinom;
notes the opinion of a majority of Members States against the decision to end up with that system, a view shared by Parliament in its Resolution of 23 June 2011 on the CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future [29];
je seznanjen z mnenjem večine držav članic, ki nasprotujejo odločitvi o odpravi tega sistema, in z dejstvom, da je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. junija 2011 z naslovom „Skupna kmetijska politika proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem“ izrazil podobno mnenje [29];
Stresses that although demand for wine in the Union has been decreasing over the last decades, there has been a tangible increase in exports to third countries during the last few years, which was not addressed in Special Report No 7/2012;
poudarja, da se je povpraševanje po vinu v Uniji zadnja desetletja sicer zmanjševalo, a se je izvoz v države nečlanice v zadnjih letih, ki niso zajeta v posebnem poročilu št. 7/2012, občutno izboljšal;
believes that the implementation of measures to promote the export of quality wines would help reduce production surpluses;
verjame, da bi z izvajanjem ukrepov za promocijo izvoza kakovostnih vin pripomogli k zmanjšanju presežne pridelave;
Urges the Commission to take measures ensuring that Member States that use flat rates per ha to calculate payments install proper control mechanisms for paying agencies guaranteeing that farmers are not overcompensated, standardise the estimation of costs so that variations in estimated costs for comparable measures are reduced to a minimum;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme ukrepe, ki bodo zagotavljali, da bodo države članice, ki za izračun plačil uporabljajo pavšalne zneske na hektar, vzpostavile ustrezne nadzorne mehanizme za plačilne agencije in tako zagotovile, da kmetje ne bodo prejemali previsokih nadomestil, in standardizirale oceno stroškov, da bi čim bolj zmanjšale razlike pri ocenjenih stroških za primerljive ukrepe;
Urges the Commission to take adequate action to establish comparability and an acceptable level of standardisation for measures based on Article 103q of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) [30];
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da bo zagotovila primerljivost in sprejemljivo raven standardizacije za ukrepe, ki temeljijo na členu 103q Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (uredba o enotni SUT) [30];
Believes that, in addition to the export of quality wines to third countries, greater support for consumption of European wines within the Union would also help to reduce the production surpluses;
meni, da bi poleg izvoza kakovostnih vin v države nečlanice večja podpora uživanju evropskih vin v Uniji prav tako pomagala zmanjšati presežno pridelavo;
Asks the Commission to relaunch a policy to promote the wine sector and improve its competitiveness in the internal market, including information campaigns for adults on responsible consumption of wine, and on its specific qualities and features, which highlights the cultural roots of European wines;
poziva Komisijo, naj prenovi politiko promocije v vinarskem sektorju in izboljša njegovo konkurenčnost na notranjem trgu, vključno z informacijskimi akcijami za odrasle o odgovornem uživanju tega proizvoda ter o njegovih kvalitativnih in posebnih značilnostih s poudarkom na kulturnih koreninah evropskih vin;
calls, furthermore, on the Commission to study an European strategy to increase exports to third countries;
Komisijo še poziva, naj preuči evropsko strategijo za povečanje izvoza v države nečlanice;
Part XII
Del XII
Special Report No 9/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Audit of the control system governing the production, processing, distribution and imports of organic products’
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 9/2012 z naslovom „Revizija nadzornega sistema za pridelavo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz ekoloških proizvodov“
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 9/2012, and endorses the Court of Auditors’ conclusions;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 9/2012 in se strinja z njegovimi ugotovitvami;
finds it regrettable, however, that audit visits were made to only six Member States, even allowing for the fact that these were the countries most directly concerned;
vendar obžaluje, da je revizija potekala samo v šestih državah, čeprav je šlo za države, ki jih je to najbolj zadevalo;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendations, in particular regarding traceability and the cross-border trade in organic products;
podpira priporočila Računskega sodišča, zlasti glede sledljivosti ekoloških proizvodov in čezmejne trgovine z njimi;
Notes that consumption of organic food constitutes less that 2 % of the entire food market, though the trend is likely to be rising;
ugotavlja, da poraba ekološke hrane predstavlja manj kot 2 % celotnega trga s hrano, čeprav se bo ta delež verjetno povečal;
Highlights the fact that the importance of organic production goes beyond healthy nutrition;
poudarja, da pomen ekološke proizvodnje presega zdravo prehrano;
organic farming is an innovative, knowledge-based approach to agricultural production with efficient use of resources, which can be an engine of rural development and employment;
ekološko kmetovanje je inovativen in na znanju temelječ pristop do kmetijske pridelave, pri kateri se viri uporabljajo učinkovito in ki je lahko motor za razvoj podeželja in tamkajšnje zaposlovanje;
increasing use of biotechnologies and organic production could provide a ‘European added value’ for agriculture, which could result in a stronger role for Europe in global competition;
vse večja uporaba biotehnologije in ekološke pridelave bi lahko zagotovila evropsko dodano vrednost kmetijstvu, s čimer bi se lahko okrepila vloga Evrope v svetovni konkurenci;
notes, furthermore, that it contributes to long-term environmental, economic and social sustainability, such as climate change mitigation and adaptation, slowing reduction in biodiversity and improving animal welfare standards;
ugotavlja, da ekološko kmetovanje poleg tega prispeva k dolgoročni okoljski, gospodarski in socialni trajnosti, kot so blažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanje nanje, upočasnitev zmanjševanja biotske raznovrstnosti in izboljšanje standardov za dobro počutje živali;
Recalls that Parliament has always supported organic farming and will continue to do so and has actively participated in creating legislation for production and labelling rules of organic food;
opominja, da je Parlament vedno podpiral ekološko kmetovanje in ga bo podpiral tudi v prihodnje ter je dejavno sodeloval pri oblikovanju zakonodaje o pridelavi ekološke hrane in pravilih za njeno označevanje;
Believes that in the context of the next Multiannual Financial Framework greater attention and more support should be directed to the production of organic products;
meni, da bi bilo treba v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru posvetiti več pozornosti proizvodnji ekoloških izdelkov in ji nameniti več podpore;
Expresses its concern that many organic products are more costly than non-organic products;
je zaskrbljen, ker je veliko ekoloških proizvodov dražjih od neekoloških;
as a result, price-sensitive consumers and people living on lower incomes are not able or are less able to afford these healthier products;
zaradi tega si potrošniki, ki se ozirajo na cene, in osebe z nižjimi prihodki ne morejo privoščiti bolj zdravih izdelkov ali pa si jih lahko privoščijo manj;
Recognises that an effective system of controls for organic production sets a number of hurdles for operators (including producers, importers and processors) to overcome but at the same time, validates their quality, giving operators credibility whilst allowing the consumer to have confidence in products labelled as organic;
priznava, da učinkovit sistem nadzora nad ekološko proizvodnjo postavlja številne ovire za izvajalce (vključno s proizvajalci, uvozniki in predelovalci), a hkrati potrjuje kakovost, saj izvajalcem daje verodostojnost, potrošniku pa omogoča zaupanje v izdelke, ki so označeni kot ekološki;
Draws attention to the growth of the organic food market from Union-grown and imported organic goods, which may also create the potential for unfair commercial practice, and points out that this requires stronger control systems at Union and Member State level;
opozarja na rast trga ekološko pridelane hrane z ekološkimi proizvodi, pridelanimi v EU, in uvoženimi proizvodi, kar bi lahko povzročilo možnost nepoštene trgovinske prakse, in poudarja, da so zato potrebni strožji nadzorni sistemi na ravni Unije in držav članic;
emphasises that controls should provide a guarantee that products labelled as organic are really organic;
poudarja, da mora nadzor zajamčiti, da so izdelki, označeni kot ekološki, dejansko ekološki;
Recalls that the Commission is responsible for the supervision of control systems and calls on the Commission to undertake a joint evaluation of the Court of Auditors’ main findings with the Member States, who bear the significant responsibility for operating the control system;
opozarja, da je Komisija pristojna za spremljanje nadzornih sistemov, in jo poziva, naj skupaj z državami članicami, ki so v veliki meri odgovorne za upravljanje nadzornega sistema, oceni glavne ugotovitve Računskega sodišča;
Stresses the importance of providing sufficient assurance that the system is operating effectively and that it ensures that consumer confidence is not undermined;
poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti zadostna jamstva, da sistem deluje učinkovito in preprečuje spodkopavanje zaupanja potrošnikov;
Asks the Commission, therefore, to bring forward initiatives and regulatory proposals aiming to ensure that all the weaknesses pointed out by Special Report No 9/2012 are remedied by the end of 2013;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj poda pobude in regulativne predloge za zagotovitev, da se do konca leta 2013 popravijo vse slabosti, omenjene v posebnem poročilu št. 9/2012;
Welcomes the Commission’s forthcoming review of the control legislation and current preparation of accreditation guidelines by the European cooperation for Accreditation as a valuable contribution to improving implementation in future;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da bo Komisija pregledala nadzorno zakonodajo in da Evropsko združenje za akreditacijo pripravlja smernice za akreditacijo, s čimer bosta dragoceno prispevala k izboljšanju prihodnjega izvajanja;
Stresses that a level playing field in applying procedures for approving and supervising control bodies is fundamental;
poudarja, da so enaki pogoji pri uporabi postopkov za odobritev in spremljanje nadzornih organov bistvenega pomena;
notes that failures lead to differences in organic labelling control, which increase the risk of fraud or organic labelling shopping and therefore have a negative impact on consumer confidence in the organic label;
ugotavlja, da napake vodijo k razlikam pri nadzoru nad označevanjem ekoloških izdelkov, s čimer se poveča možnost goljufij ali kupovanja ekološke oznake, kar negativno vpliva na zaupanje potrošnikov v ekološko oznako;
Expresses its surprise and disquiet at the Court of Auditors’ finding that Member States’ competent authorities have been failing to document, or have not sufficiently documented, the approval and supervision procedures applied to control bodies in order to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements;
je presenečen in zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da pristojni organi držav članic nimajo oziroma nimajo zadostno dokumentiranih postopkov na področju akreditacije in spremljanja nadzornih organov, da bi zagotovili spoštovanje predpisanih zahtev;
calls for the national parliaments, whose task it is to exercise control over the Member States’ governments, to be informed of this finding;
zahteva, da se nacionalne parlamente, ki so pristojni za nadzorovanje vlad držav članic, obvesti o tej ugotovitvi;
Emphasises that the independence of the control bodies, public authorities included, is crucial to maintaining the reputation of the organic label;
poudarja, da je neodvisnost nadzornih organov, med drugim javnih organov, bistvena za ohranitev ugleda ekološke oznake;
Welcomes the improvements in IT systems already at hand and sees these as essential components of effective controls in the future;
pozdravlja izboljšave računalniških sistemov, ki so že na voljo, in meni, da so bistvene za učinkovit nadzor v prihodnosti;
Emphasises Member States’ responsibilities in this, as in other domains, and regards the regular meetings of the Standing Committee on Organic Farming (SCOF) as highly valuable in terms of exchange of best practice and information between Member States, the Commission, and third country staff involved in the control systems;
poudarja odgovornost držav članic na tem in na drugih področjih ter meni, da so redne seje stalnega odbora za ekološko kmetovanje zelo pomembne v smislu izmenjav najboljše prakse in informacij med državami članicami, Komisijo in uslužbenci iz držav nečlanic, ki sodelujejo v nadzornih sistemih;
notes, nevertheless, the Court of Auditors’ comment (point (75) that this body needs to improve its capacity to exchange information on the functioning of the import authorisation regime;
vendar je seznanjen z opombo Računskega sodišča (točka 75), da mora to telo izboljšati svojo sposobnost izmenjave informacij o delovanju režima uvoznih dovoljenj;
Emphasises the importance of the exchange of information within Member States and between Member States and the Commission;
poudarja pomen izmenjave informacij v državah članicah, med njimi in Komisijo;
therefore, asks the Commission to introduce appropriate measures to make sure the flow of information is relevant, reliable and timely;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj uvede primerne ukrepe, da bo tok informacij ustrezen, zanesljiv in pravočasen;
in particular, asks the Commission to take appropriate measures to speed up and to increase the reliability of the communications relating to organics certification issues such as those communicated through the ‘Organic Farming Information System’;
zlasti jo poziva, naj sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za pospešitev in večjo zanesljivost komunikacije v zvezi z vprašanji ekološkega certificiranja, kot so tista, ki se sporočajo prek informacijskega sistema za ekološko kmetijstvo;
Calls on the Member States to cease, before the cut-off date, to grant the transitional import authorisations established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2083/92 [31], an arrangement which has been extended several times but is to end under the current Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1267/2011 [32] of 6 December 2011, which stipulates that Member States may not issue authorisations of this type after 1 July 2014;
zahteva, da države članice predčasno prenehajo izdajati uvozna dovoljenja, ki jih prehodno omogoča Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2083/92 [31], saj bo ta ureditev, ki je bila večkrat podaljšana, opuščena v skladu s trenutno veljavno Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1267/2011 [32] z dne 6. decembra 2011, ki predvideva, da države članice po 1. juliju 2014 ne bodo smele več izdajati tovrstnih dovoljenj;
Observes the comment in the 2011 Annual Activity Report of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development indicating that organic products were erroneously suggested as the potential source of contamination of the E. Coli outbreak casting some doubts over organic farming supervision and that the year was marked by extensive media coverage of supervision and control weaknesses in the organic sector [33], notably in the wake of a fraud uncovered at the end of the year, with falsified data and products falsely labelled as organic;
je seznanjen z opombo v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011 generalnega direktorata Komisije za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, da so bili ekološki izdelki napačno omenjeni kot morebitni vir okužbe izbruha bakterije E. coli, kar je zbudilo dvome glede nadzora nad ekološkim kmetovanjem, ter da je bilo leto zaznamovano z obširnim poročanjem v medijih o pomanjkljivostih spremljanja in nadzora v ekološkem sektorju [33], predvsem zaradi ugotovljene goljufije na koncu leta s ponarejenimi podatki in izdelki, ki so bili napačno označeni kot ekološki;
Notes the reservation in that 2011 Annual Activity Report regarding possible reputational risk to the organic control system if it is not implemented properly across the Union and at its external borders;
je seznanjen s pridržkom v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2011 v zvezi z morebitnim tveganjem ugleda za nadzorni sistem ekološke pridelave, če se ta ne izvaja pravilno v vsej Uniji in na njenih zunanjih mejah;
Is waiting for the follow-up of the Court of Auditors in three years in order to get a picture of the remedial measures put in place and their results;
pričakuje nadaljnje spremljanje Računskega sodišča čez tri leta, da bi dobili pregled nad sprejetimi popravnimi ukrepi in njihovimi rezultati;
Part XIII
Del XIII
Special Report No 12/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Did the Commission and Eurostat improve the process for producing reliable and credible European statistics?’
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 12/2012 z naslovom „Ali sta Komisija in Eurostat izboljšala proces priprave zanesljive in verodostojne evropske statistike?“
Points out that:
poudarja, da:
the European statistical system consists in a partnership between the Union statistical authority, Eurostat, and the national statistical institutes which are responsible for coordinating all activities at national level for the development, production and dissemination of European statistics and may receive grants from the Union budget without prior call for proposals;
evropski statistični sistem temelji na partnerstvu med statističnim organom Unije (Eurostat) ter nacionalnimi statističnimi inštituti, ki na nacionalni ravni usklajujejo vse dejavnosti za razvoj, pripravo in razširjanje evropskih statističnih podatkov in lahko iz proračuna Unije prejmejo donacije brez predhodnih razpisov za zbiranje ponudb;
the European Statistical System Committee provides professional guidance to the European Statistical system;
Odbor za evropski statistični sistem strokovno usmerja evropski statistični sistem;
the overall objective of the audit was to assess whether the Commission and Eurostat have improved the process for producing reliable and credible European statistics;
je bil skupni cilj revizije oceniti, ali sta Komisija in Eurostat izboljšala proces priprave zanesljivih in verodostojnih evropskih statističnih podatkov;