natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Member States concerned shall lay down in national law the modalities for implementing the provisions of paragraph 1 and the consequences of decisions pursuant to those provisions in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, including providing for exceptions from the application of this Article for humanitarian or political reasons or for reasons of public international law.
Zadevne države članice v nacionalnem pravu v skladu z načelom nevračanja določijo načine izvajanja določb odstavka 1 in posledice odločb na podlagi teh določb, vključno z določitvijo izjem pri izvajanju tega člena zaradi humanitarnih ali političnih razlogov ali razlogov v zvezi z mednarodnim javnim pravom.
Where the safe third country does not readmit the applicant, Member States shall ensure that access to a procedure is given in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II.
Kadar varna tretja država prosilca ne sprejme ponovno, države članice zagotovijo dostopnost postopka v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz poglavja II.
Member States shall inform the Commission periodically of the countries to which this concept is applied in accordance with this Article.
Države članice redno obveščajo Komisijo o državah, za katere se v skladu s tem členom uporablja ta koncept.
Subsequent application
Naknadna prošnja
Where a person who has applied for international protection in a Member State makes further representations or a subsequent application in the same Member State, that Member State shall examine these further representations or the elements of the subsequent application in the framework of the examination of the previous application or in the framework of the examination of the decision under review or appeal, insofar as the competent authorities can take into account and consider all the elements underlying the further representations or subsequent application within this framework.
Kadar oseba, ki je zaprosila za mednarodno zaščito v državi članici, poda naknadne navedbe ali vloži naknadno prošnjo v isti državi članici, ta država članica obravnava te naknadne navedbe ali elemente naknadne prošnje v okviru obravnavanja predhodne prošnje ali v okviru preizkusa izdane odločbe ali odločanja o pritožbi zoper izdano odločbo, če lahko pristojni organi v teh postopkih upoštevajo in obravnavajo vse elemente naknadnih navedb ali naknadne prošnje.
For the purpose of taking a decision on the admissibility of an application for international protection pursuant to Article 33(2)(d), a subsequent application for international protection shall be subject first to a preliminary examination as to whether new elements or findings have arisen or have been presented by the applicant which relate to the examination of whether the applicant qualifies as a beneficiary of international protection by virtue of Directive 2011/95/EU.
Za namene odločanja o dopustnosti prošnje za mednarodno zaščito v skladu s členom 33(2)(d) je naknadna prošnja za mednarodno zaščito najprej predmet predhodne obravnave o tem, ali so se pojavili novi elementi ali ugotovitve v zvezi z vprašanjem, ali prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje kot upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite, na podlagi Direktive 2011/95/EU, oziroma je prosilec navedel take nove elemente ali ugotovitve.
If the preliminary examination referred to in paragraph 2 concludes that new elements or findings have arisen or been presented by the applicant which significantly add to the likelihood of the applicant qualifying as a beneficiary of international protection by virtue of Directive 2011/95/EU, the application shall be further examined in conformity with Chapter II.
Če se v predhodni obravnavi iz odstavka 2 ugotovi, da so se pojavili novi elementi ali ugotovitve, ki pomembno povečujejo verjetnost, da prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje kot upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite, na podlagi Direktive 2011/95/EU, oziroma da je prosilec navedel take nove elemente ali ugotovitve, se obravnavanje prošnje nadaljuje v skladu s poglavjem II.
Member States may also provide for other reasons for a subsequent application to be further examined.
Države članice lahko določijo tudi druge razloge za nadaljnje obravnavanje naknadne prošnje.
Member States may provide that the application will only be further examined if the applicant concerned was, through no fault of his or her own, incapable of asserting the situations set forth in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article in the previous procedure, in particular by exercising his or her right to an effective remedy pursuant to Article 46.
Države članice lahko odločijo, da bo prošnja nadalje obravnavana le, če zadevni prosilec brez svoje krivde v predhodnem postopku ni mogel uveljaviti okoliščin iz odstavkov 2 in 3 tega člena, zlasti z uveljavljanjem svoje pravice do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva v skladu s členom 46.
When a subsequent application is not further examined pursuant to this Article, it shall be considered inadmissible, in accordance with Article 33(2)(d).
Kadar se v skladu s tem členom obravnavanje naknadne prošnje ne nadaljuje, se naknadna prošnja šteje za nedopustno v skladu s členom 33(2)(d).
The procedure referred to in this Article may also be applicable in the case of:
Postopek iz tega člena se lahko uporabi tudi v primeru:
a dependant who lodges an application after he or she has, in accordance with Article 7(2), consented to have his or her case be part of an application lodged on his or her behalf; and/or
vzdrževane osebe, ki vloži prošnjo, potem ko je v skladu s členom 7(2) soglašala, da bo njen primer del prošnje, ki je bila vložena v njenem imenu; in/ali
an unmarried minor who lodges an application after an application has been lodged on his or her behalf pursuant to Article 7(5)(c).
neporočenega mladoletnika, ki vloži prošnjo, potem ko je bila prošnja vložena v njegovem imenu v skladu s členom 7(5)(c).
In those cases, the preliminary examination referred to in paragraph 2 will consist of examining whether there are facts relating to the dependant’s or the unmarried minor’s situation which justify a separate application.
V teh primerih se bo v okviru predhodne obravnave iz odstavka 2 preučilo, ali obstajajo dejstva v zvezi z okoliščinami vzdrževane osebe ali neporočenega mladoletnika, ki upravičujejo ločeno prošnjo.
Where a person with regard to whom a transfer decision has to be enforced pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 makes further representations or a subsequent application in the transferring Member State, those representations or subsequent applications shall be examined by the responsible Member State, as defined in that Regulation, in accordance with this Directive.
Kadar oseba, v zvezi s katero je treba izvršiti odločbo o premestitvi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013, poda naknadne navedbe ali vloži naknadno prošnjo v državi, ki izvede premestitev, takšne navedbe ali naknadne prošnje v skladu s to direktivo obravnava odgovorna država članica, kot je določeno v navedeni uredbi.
Exceptions from the right to remain in case of subsequent applications
Izjeme glede pravice ostati v državi članici v primeru naknadne prošnje
Member States may make an exception from the right to remain in the territory where a person:
Države članice lahko predvidijo izjemo glede pravice ostati na njihovem ozemlju, kadar oseba:
has lodged a first subsequent application, which is not further examined pursuant to Article 40(5), merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of a decision which would result in his or her imminent removal from that Member State; or
vloži prvo naknadno prošnjo, katere obravnavanje se v skladu s členom 40(5) ne nadaljuje, samo zato da bi odložila ali onemogočila izvršitev odločbe, na podlagi katere bi morala biti ta oseba odstranjena, ali
makes another subsequent application in the same Member State, following a final decision considering a first subsequent application inadmissible pursuant to Article 40(5) or after a final decision to reject that application as unfounded.
po izdaji dokončnega sklepa o nedopustnosti prve naknadne prošnje v skladu s členom 40(5) ali dokončne odločbe o zavrnitvi te prošnje kot neutemeljene poda drugo naknadno prošnjo v isti državi članici.
Member States may make such an exception only where the determining authority considers that a return decision will not lead to direct or indirect refoulement in violation of that Member State’s international and Union obligations.
Države članice lahko predvidijo takšno izjemo le, kadar organ za presojo meni, da odločba o vrnitvi ne bo povzročila neposrednega ali posrednega vračanja, s katerim bi bile kršene mednarodne obveznosti in obveznosti Unije te države članice.
In cases referred to in paragraph 1, Member States may also:
V primerih iz odstavka 1 lahko države članice tudi:
derogate from the time limits normally applicable in accelerated procedures, in accordance with national law, when the examination procedure is accelerated in accordance with Article 31(8)(g);
odstopajo od rokov, ki se v skladu z nacionalnim pravom običajno uporabljajo v pospešenih postopkih, če se prošnja obravnava pospešeno v skladu s členom 31(8)(g);
derogate from the time limits normally applicable to admissibility procedures provided for in Articles 33 and 34, in accordance with national law; and/or
odstopajo od rokov, ki se v skladu z nacionalnim pravom običajno uporabljajo v postopkih ugotavljanja dopustnosti iz členov 33 in 34, in/ali
derogate from Article 46(8).
odstopajo od člena 46(8).
Member States shall ensure that applicants whose application is subject to a preliminary examination pursuant to Article 40 enjoy the guarantees provided for in Article 12(1).
Države članice zagotovijo, da so vsem prosilcem, katerih prošnja je predmet predhodne obravnave v skladu s členom 40, zagotovljena jamstva iz člena 12(1).
Member States may lay down in national law rules on the preliminary examination pursuant to Article 40.
Države članice lahko v nacionalnem pravu določijo pravila o predhodni obravnavi v skladu s členom 40.
permit the preliminary examination to be conducted on the sole basis of written submissions without a personal interview, with the exception of the cases referred to in Article 40(6).
dovoljujejo izvedbo predhodne obravnave zgolj na podlagi pisnih navedb brez osebnega razgovora, razen v primerih iz člena 40(6).
Those rules shall not render impossible the access of applicants to a new procedure or result in the effective annulment or severe curtailment of such access.
Ta pravila prosilcu ne smejo onemogočiti dostopa do novega postopka, niti ne povzročiti dejanskega izničenja ali resne okrnjenosti tega dostopa.
Member States shall ensure that the applicant is informed in an appropriate manner of the outcome of the preliminary examination and, if the application is not to be further examined, of the reasons why and the possibilities for seeking an appeal or review of the decision.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je prosilec ustrezno obveščen o izidu predhodne obravnave in, če se prošnja ne bo nadalje obravnavala, o razlogih za to in možnostih za pritožbo ali preizkus te odločitve.
Member States may provide for procedures, in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II, in order to decide at the border or transit zones of the Member State on:
Države članice lahko v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz poglavja II predvidijo postopke, v katerih se na mejah ali v tranzitnih območjih države članice odloča o:
the admissibility of an application, pursuant to Article 33, made at such locations; and/or
dopustnosti prošnje v skladu s členom 33, ki je bila podana na takih krajih; in/ali
the substance of an application in a procedure pursuant to Article 31(8).
vsebini prošenj v postopku iz člena 31(8).
Member States shall ensure that a decision in the framework of the procedures provided for in paragraph 1 is taken within a reasonable time.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se v postopkih iz odstavka 1 odločitev sprejme v razumnem roku.
When a decision has not been taken within four weeks, the applicant shall be granted entry to the territory of the Member State in order for his or her application to be processed in accordance with the other provisions of this Directive.
Če odločitev ni sprejeta v štirih tednih, se prosilcu dovoli vstop na ozemlje države članice, da bi se njegova prošnja obravnavala v skladu z ostalimi določbami te direktive.
In the event of arrivals involving a large number of third-country nationals or stateless persons lodging applications for international protection at the border or in a transit zone, which makes it impossible in practice to apply there the provisions of paragraph 1, those procedures may also be applied where and for as long as these third-country nationals or stateless persons are accommodated normally at locations in proximity to the border or transit zone.
V primeru prihodov, pri katerih gre za veliko državljanov tretjih držav ali oseb brez državljanstva, ki vložijo prošnje za mednarodno zaščito na meji ali v tranzitnih območjih, zaradi česar v praksi ni mogoče izvajati določb iz odstavka 1, je te postopke mogoče izvajati tudi, kadar in kolikor časa so ti državljani tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva normalno nastanjeni v bližini meje ali tranzitnega območja.
PROCEDURES FOR THE WITHDRAWAL OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION
POSTOPKI ZA ODVZEM MEDNARODNE ZAŠČITE
Withdrawal of international protection
Odvzem mednarodne zaščite
Member States shall ensure that an examination to withdraw international protection from a particular person may commence when new elements or findings arise indicating that there are reasons to reconsider the validity of his or her international protection.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se lahko postopek odvzema mednarodne zaščite določeni osebi začne, kadar se pojavijo novi elementi ali ugotovitve, ki kažejo, da je treba veljavnost mednarodne zaščite ponovno preučiti.
Member States shall ensure that, where the competent authority is considering withdrawing international protection from a third-country national or stateless person in accordance with Article 14 or 19 of Directive 2011/95/EU, the person concerned enjoys the following guarantees:
Države članice zagotovijo, da so, kadar pristojni organ preučuje možnost odvzema mednarodne zaščite državljanu tretje države ali osebi brez državljanstva v skladu s členom14 ali 19 Direktive 2011/95/EU, tej osebi zagotovljena naslednja jamstva:
to be informed in writing that the competent authority is reconsidering his or her qualification as a beneficiary of international protection and the reasons for such a reconsideration; and
pisno obvestilo, da pristojni organ ponovno preučuje, ali izpolnjuje pogoje kot upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite, in o razlogih za takšno preučevanje in
to be given the opportunity to submit, in a personal interview in accordance with Article 12(1)(b) and Articles 14 to 17 or in a written statement, reasons as to why his or her international protection should not be withdrawn.
možnost, da na osebnem razgovoru v skladu s členom 12(1)(b) ter členi 14 do 17 ali v pisni izjavi navede razloge, zakaj ji mednarodna zaščita ne bi smela biti odvzeta.
In addition, Member States shall ensure that within the framework of the procedure set out in paragraph 1:
Poleg tega države članice zagotovijo, da v okviru takšnega postopka iz odstavka 1:
the competent authority is able to obtain precise and up-to-date information from various sources, such as, where appropriate, from EASO and UNHCR, as to the general situation prevailing in the countries of origin of the persons concerned; and
pristojni organ lahko pridobi točne in ažurne informacije o splošnih razmerah, ki vladajo v izvornih državah zadevnih oseb, iz različnih virov, kot sta na primer, kadar je to primerno, EASO in UNHCR; in
where information on an individual case is collected for the purposes of reconsidering international protection, it is not obtained from the actor(s) of persecution or serious harm in a manner that would result in such actor(s) being directly informed of the fact that the person concerned is a beneficiary of international protection whose status is under reconsideration, or jeopardise the physical integrity of the person or his or her dependants, or the liberty and security of his or her family members still living in the country of origin.
pri zbiranju informacij o posameznem primeru ponovne preučitve mednarodne zaščite se informacije od preganjalca(-ev) ali povzročitelja(-ev) resne škode ne pridobivajo tako, da bi bili ta(ti) preganjalec(-i) ali povzročitelj(-i) neposredno obveščen(-i), da je zadevna oseba upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite, katere status se ponovno preučuje, kar bi ogrozilo telesno integriteto te osebe ali oseb, ki jih vzdržuje, ali svobodo in varnost njenih družinskih članov, ki še vedno živijo v izvorni državi.
Member States shall ensure that the decision of the competent authority to withdraw international protection is given in writing.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se odločba pristojnega organa o odvzemu mednarodne zaščite izda v pisni obliki.
Once the competent authority has taken the decision to withdraw international protection, Article 20, Article 22, Article 23(1) and Article 29 are equally applicable.
Ko pristojni organ izda odločbo o odvzemu mednarodne zaščite, se prav tako uporabljajo člen 20, člen 22, člen 23(1) in člen 29.
By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 to 4 of this Article, Member States may decide that international protection shall lapse by law where the beneficiary of international protection has unequivocally renounced his or her recognition as such.
Z odstopanjem od odstavkov 1, 2, 3 in 4 tega člena se države članice lahko odločijo, da mednarodna zaščita preneha po samem zakonu, kadar se je upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite nedvoumno odpovedal, da se ga prizna kot takega.
A Member State may also provide that international protection shall lapse by law where the beneficiary of international protection has become a national of that Member State.
Država članica lahko določi tudi, da mednarodna zaščita preneha po samem zakonu, če je upravičenec do mednarodne zaščite postal državljan te države članice.
Member States shall ensure that applicants have the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal, against the following:
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo prosilci pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva pred sodiščem zoper:
a decision taken on their application for international protection, including a decision:
odločbo, izdano v zvezi z njegovo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito, vključno z odločbo:
considering an application to be unfounded in relation to refugee status and/or subsidiary protection status;
o neutemeljenosti prošnje v zvezi s statusom begunca in/ali subsidiarne zaščite,
considering an application to be inadmissible pursuant to Article 33(2);
o nedopustnosti prošnje v skladu s členom 33(2),
taken at the border or in the transit zones of a Member State as described in Article 43(1);
sprejeto na meji ali v tranzitnih območjih države članice, kot je opisano v členu 43(1);
not to conduct an examination pursuant to Article 39;
ne opravi obravnavanja na podlagi člena 39;
a refusal to reopen the examination of an application after its discontinuation pursuant to Articles 27 and 28;
zavrnitev ponovne uvedbe postopka obravnavanja prošnje po njegovi prekinitvi v skladu s členoma 27 in 28;
a decision to withdraw international protection pursuant to Article 45.
odločbo o odvzemu mednarodne zaščite v skladu s členom 45.
Member States shall ensure that persons recognised by the determining authority as eligible for subsidiary protection have the right to an effective remedy pursuant to paragraph 1 against a decision considering an application unfounded in relation to refugee status.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo osebe, ki jih je organ za presojo priznal kot upravičene do subsidiarne zaščite, pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva na podlagi odstavka 1 zoper odločbo o neutemeljenosti prošnje v zvezi s statusom begunca.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1(c), where the subsidiary protection status granted by a Member State offers the same rights and benefits as those offered by the refugee status under Union and national law, that Member State may consider an appeal against a decision considering an application unfounded in relation to refugee status inadmissible on the grounds of insufficient interest on the part of the applicant in maintaining the proceedings.
Brez poseganja v odstavek 1(c), kadar status subsidiarne zaščite, ki ga prizna država članica, omogoča iste pravice in koristi kot status begunca po pravu Unije in nacionalnem pravu, sme ta država članica šteti, da je pritožba zoper odločbo o neutemeljenosti prošnje v zvezi s statusom begunca nedopustna zaradi nezadostnega interesa prosilca za nadaljevanje postopka.
In order to comply with paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that an effective remedy provides for a full and ex nunc examination of both facts and points of law, including, where applicable, an examination of the international protection needs pursuant to Directive 2011/95/EU, at least in appeals procedures before a court or tribunal of first instance.
Države članice zaradi spoštovanja odstavka 1 zagotovijo, da učinkovito pravno sredstvo vsaj v pritožbenih postopkih pred sodiščem prve stopnje zagotavlja podrobno in ex nunc presojo dejstev in pravnih vprašanj, po potrebi vključno s presojo potreb po mednarodni zaščiti v skladu z Direktivo 2011/95/EU.
Member States shall provide for reasonable time limits and other necessary rules for the applicant to exercise his or her right to an effective remedy pursuant to paragraph 1.
Države članice določijo razumne roke in druga potrebna pravila za uveljavljanje pravice prosilca do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva v skladu z odstavkom 1.
The time limits shall not render such exercise impossible or excessively difficult.
Roki prosilcem ne smejo onemogočiti ali pretirano otežiti takega uveljavljanja.
Member States may also provide for an ex officio review of decisions taken pursuant to Article 43.
Države članice lahko določijo tudi, da se odločbe, izdane na podlagi člena 43, preizkusijo po uradni dolžnosti.
Without prejudice to paragraph 6, Member States shall allow applicants to remain in the territory until the time limit within which to exercise their right to an effective remedy has expired and, when such a right has been exercised within the time limit, pending the outcome of the remedy.
Brez poseganja v odstavek 6 države članice prosilcem dovolijo, da ostanejo na njihovem ozemlju do izteka roka, v katerem lahko uveljavljajo svojo pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in, če so tako pravico v tem roku uveljavljali, pa do zaključka postopka s pravnim sredstvom.
In the case of a decision:
V primeru odločbe:
considering an application to be manifestly unfounded in accordance with Article 32(2) or unfounded after examination in accordance with Article 31(8), except for cases where these decisions are based on the circumstances referred to in Article 31(8)(h);
o očitni neutemeljenosti prošnje v skladu s členom 32(2) ali odločbe o neutemeljenosti prošnje po obravnavi v skladu s členom 31(8), razen v primerih, ko te odločbe temeljijo na okoliščinah iz člena 31(8)(h);
considering an application to be inadmissible pursuant to Article 33(2)(a), (b) or (d);
o nedopustnosti prošnje v skladu s členom 33(2)(a), (b) ali (d);
rejecting the reopening of the applicant’s case after it has been discontinued according to Article 28; or
o zavrnitvi nadaljevanja obravnavanja prosilčeve zadeve, ki je bilo prekinjeno v skladu s členom 28, ali
not to examine or not to examine fully the application pursuant to Article 39,
o neobravnavanju ali nepopolnem obravnavanju prošnje v skladu s členom 39,