natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See Communication on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EC Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement to state aid in the aviation sector, OJ C 350, 10.12.1994, p. 5.
Glej Sporočilo o uporabi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe ES in člena 61 Sporazuma EGP za državno pomoč v letalskem sektorju (UL C 350, 10.12.1994, str. 5).
YBN Consult — Znalecký ústav, s.r.o. is an expert institute qualified to provide expert advice in economics and the building industry.
YBN Consult – Znalecký ústav, s.r.o. je strokovni inštitut, pristojen za strokovno svetovanje na področju ekonomije in gradbeništva.
PROSCON — s.r.o. is an expert institute qualified to provide expert advice with respect to economics.
PROSCON – s.r.o. je strokovni inštitut, pristojen za strokovno svetovanje na področju ekonomije.
Mr Vladimír Čmejla is an expert in economics, patents and inventions.
Vladimír Čmejla je ekonomist ter strokovnjak za patente in izume.
For the daily PRIBOR rates see http://www.cnb.cz/en/financial_markets/money_market/pribor/daily.jsp.
Več podatkov o dnevnih stopnjah PRIBOR je na voljo na http://www.cnb.cz/en/financial_markets/money_market/pribor/daily.jsp.
For the methodology of the PRIBOR see http://www.cnb.cz/docs/ARADY/MET_LIST/prib_en.pdf.
Več podatkov o metodologiji za stopnjo PRIBOR je na voljo na http://www.cnb.cz/docs/ARADY/MET_LIST/prib_en.pdf.
The average rates are derived from the arithmetic mean of the monthly three-month PRIBOR averages plus 300 basis points according to the Czech National Bank and the relevant reference rates plus 220 basis points between April 2009 and June 2010 (for the relevant data see the tables at http://www.cnb.cz/en/financial_markets/money_market/pribor/averages_form.jsp and http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference_rates.html).).
Povprečne obrestne mere se izračunajo na podlagi aritmetične sredine mesečnih povprečnih vrednosti trimesečnega PRIBOR s pribitkom 300 bazičnih točk v skladu s češko nacionalno banko ter ustreznih referenčnih obrestnih mer s pribitkom 220 bazičnih točk za obdobje od aprila 2009 do junija 2010 (ustrezni podatki so na voljo v tabelah na spletnih straneh http://www.cnb.cz/en/financial_markets/money_market/pribor/averages_form.jsp in http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference_rates.html).
Interest was duly paid for five consecutive calendar quarters and on one occasion a contractual penalty was charged for two day's delay in payment.
Obresti so bile v celoti plačane za pet zaporednih koledarskih četrtletij, pri čemer je bila enkrat zaračunana pogodbena kazen zaradi dvodnevne zamude pri plačilu.
CZEONIA (Czech Over Night Index Average) is defined as the weighted average of the interest rates of all unsecured O/N deposits placed by reference banks on the interbank market.
CZEONIA (češko uteženo povprečje obrestnih mer za medbančna posojila čez noč) je opredeljena kot uteženo povprečje obrestnih mer za vse nezavarovane depozite referenčnih bank čez noč na medbančnem trgu.
It is calculated and published by the Czech National Bank (http://www.cnb.cz/en/financial_markets/money_market/czeonia/daily.jsp).
Izračuna in objavi ga češka nacionalna banka (http://www.cnb.cz/en/financial_markets/money_market/czeonia/daily.jsp).
The Commission requested information from the Czech Republic by letters dated 14 May 2009 and 24 September 2009.
Komisija je z dopisoma z dne 14. maja 2009 in 24. septembra 2009 zahtevala informacije od Češke.
The Czech Republic provided the Commission with further information by letters dated 10 September 2009 and 25 November 2009.
Češka je Komisiji predložila dodatne informacije z dopisoma z dne 10. septembra 2009 in 25. novembra 2009.
The Czech Republic provided comments on that decision by letter dated 26 April 2010.
Češka je z dopisom z dne 26. aprila 2010 predložila pripombe v zvezi s to odločitvijo.
The Commission asked further questions by letter dated 6 July 2010, to which the Czech Republic replied on 15 September 2010.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 6. julija 2010 zastavila dodatna vprašanja, na katera je Češka odgovorila 15. septembra 2010.
The Commission received comments from four interested parties: Travel Service and Icelandair Group on 10 March 2011, Czech Connect Airlines a.s. on 11 March 2011, JOB AIR Technic a.s. on 10 March 2011, and ČSA on 14 March 2011.
Komisija je prejela pripombe štirih zainteresiranih strani: 10. marca 2011 od podjetja Travel Service in Icelandair Group, 11. marca 2011 od podjetja Czech Connect Airlines a.s., 10. marca 2011 od podjetja JOB AIR Technic a.s. in 14. marca 2011 od ČSA. Komisija je te pripombe posredovala Češki in ji dala možnost odgovora.
The Commission forwarded these comments to the Czech Republic, which was given the opportunity to reply; the Commission received the reply by letter dated 12 May 2011.
Odgovor Češke je prejela v dopisu z dne 12. maja 2011.
The opening decision dated 24 February 2010 refers to the Osinek loan of CZK 2,5 billion on the basis of the loan agreement concluded on 30 April 2009 and assumes that the decollateralisation of the loan on the basis of Czech Government Resolution No 1343 of 26 October 2009 had already been carried out.
Sklep o začetku postopka z dne 24. februarja 2010 se nanaša na posojilo podjetja Osinek v višini 2,5 milijarde CZK, ki je bilo odobreno na podlagi posojilne pogodbe, sklenjene 30. aprila 2009, pri čemer temelji na domnevi, da je zavarovanje posojila s premoženjem na podlagi resolucije češke vlade št. 1343 z dne 26. oktobra 2009 že prenehalo.
However, the decollateralisation of the loan and its capitalisation (the debt-for-equity swap) was notified to the Commission on 12 May 2010 (SA.30908 ČSA — Czech Airlines — Restructuring plan) and implemented in June 2010.
Vendar je bila Komisija o prenehanju zavarovanja posojila s premoženjem in njegovi kapitalizaciji (zamenjavi terjatev v lastniške deleže), ki sta bila izvedena junija 2010, obveščena 12. maja 2010 (SA.30908 ČSA – Czech Airlines – Načrt prestrukturiranja).
Therefore, this decision deals only with the Osinek loan of CZK 2,5 billion itself on the basis of the loan agreement concluded on 30 April 2009.
Zato je v tem sklepu obravnavano le posojilo podjetja Osinek v višini 2,5 milijarde CZK, odobreno na podlagi posojilne pogodbe, sklenjene 30. aprila 2009.
The assessment of the decollateralisation and subsequent debt-for-equity swap of the Osinek loan will be the subject of the final decision in Case SA.30908.
Ocena prenehanja zavarovanja s premoženjem in naknadne zamenjave terjatev v lastniške deleže pri posojilu podjetja Osinek bo vključena v končno odločitev v zadevi SA.30908.
The company made profits in 2007 and 2008.
Podjetje je v letih 2007 in 2008 poslovalo z dobičkom.
However, its business result deteriorated significantly in 2009.
Leta 2009 pa je bil njegov poslovni rezultat bistveno slabši.
Its turnover had diminished slightly over the previous four years, but cash flow was declining considerably.
Prihodki podjetja se v predhodnih štirih letih niso veliko zmanjšali, močno pa se je zmanjševal njegov denarni tok.
The level of debt was more or less stable.
Raven zadolženosti je bila bolj ali manj stabilna.
In particular, the Czech Republic is of the opinion that on the date of signing the Osinek loan agreement, ČSA was not a firm in difficulty and only became a firm in difficulty as late as August 2009.
Češka zlasti meni, da ČSA na datum podpisa posojilne pogodbe s podjetjem Osinek ni bilo podjetje v težavah in da je bilo v težavah šele od avgusta 2009.
The Czech Republic argues that despite its growing problems ČSA has always been able to secure its viability.
Češka trdi, da je podjetju ČSA kljub vedno večjim težavam vedno uspelo zagotoviti uspešno poslovanje.
The interested third parties argue that ČSA was in severe difficulties already before 1 July 2008.
Zainteresirane tretje strani trdijo, da je bilo podjetje ČSA v resnih težavah že pred 1. julijem 2008.
Furthermore, they argue that the Osinek loan was provided at a substantially lower interest rate than what a bank would require under similar circumstances, considering the financial situation of ČSA, the length of repayment, the quality of the collateral and the low probability of actual repayment.
Poleg tega trdijo, da je bilo posojilo podjetja Osinek zagotovljeno po znatno nižji obrestni meri, kot bi jo zahtevala banka v podobnih okoliščinah ob upoštevanju finančnega stanja ČSA, dolžine obdobja vračila, kakovosti zavarovanja s premoženjem in majhne verjetnosti za dejansko vračilo.
One competitor who provided comments claims that ČSA fulfilled the condition that more than half of its registered capital had disappeared in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Eno od konkurenčnih podjetij, ki so predložila pripombe, trdi, da je podjetje ČSA izpolnjevalo pogoj, da je bila v letih 2007, 2008 in 2009 izgubljena več kot polovica njegovega delniškega kapitala.
Moreover, in the years 2008 and 2009, more than one quarter of the registered capital of ČSA had disappeared over the preceding 12 months.
Poleg tega je bila v letih 2008 in 2009 v preteklih 12 mesecih izgubljena več kot četrtina delniškega kapitala ČSA.
Furthermore, the Czech authorities argue that ČSA was able to operate without state aid until the second half of 2009.
Poleg tega so češki organi trdili, da je podjetje ČSA uspešno poslovalo brez državne pomoči do druge polovice leta 2009.
The condition of ČSA's assets was not seriously impaired even in the first half of 2009, and its value actually increased from CZK [8340-9255] million in the first quarter of 2009 to CZK [8990-9920] million in the second quarter of 2009.
Stanje premoženja ČSA tudi v prvi polovici leta 2009 ni bilo resno ogroženo, pri čemer se je njegova vrednost dejansko povečala z [8340–9255] milijonov CZK v prvi četrtini leta 2009 na [8990–9920] milijonov CZK v drugi četrtini leta 2009.
The Czech Republic claims that, at that time, ČSA still had access to external financing by private banks and became a firm in difficulties only in August 2009.
Češka trdi, da je podjetje ČSA takrat še vedno imelo dostop do zunanjega financiranja s strani zasebnih bank in da je bilo v težavah šele od avgusta 2009.
In early 2009 ČSA's creditworthiness corresponded to rating category B.
V začetku leta 2009 je kreditna sposobnost podjetja ČSA ustrezala bonitetni oceni B.
In order to verify the claims of the Czech Republic, the Commission consulted several private banks having business relations with ČSA on their internal rating for ČSA in the first six months of 2009, the changes of the internal rating for ČSA between July 2008 and July 2009, the conditions of loans which were granted to ČSA in the first six months of 2009, and other comments concerning ČSA's creditworthiness in the first six months of 2009.
Komisija je pri preverjanju trditev Češke od več zasebnih bank, ki so poslovale s ČSA, zahtevala informacije glede njihove notranje bonitetne ocene podjetja ČSA v prvih šestih mesecih leta 2009, sprememb notranje bonitetne ocene podjetja ČSA od julija 2008 do julija 2009, pogojev za posojila, ki so bila odobrena ČSA v prvih šestih mesecih leta 2009, in glede drugih pripomb v zvezi s kreditno sposobnostjo ČSA v prvih šestih mesecih leta 2009.
Three private banks provided information on the condition that the information would be held in confidence, would be used only for the Commission's internal assessment and would not be disclosed to any third party, including ČSA and the Czech authorities.
Tri zasebne banke so predložile informacije pod pogojem, da bodo obravnavane kot zaupne, da se bodo uporabile samo pri notranji oceni Komisije in da ne bodo razkrite nobeni tretji osebi, vključno s ČSA in češkimi organi.
The Commission notes that the date of the appraisal report for the collateral Hangar F (see Table 1) is 1 June 2009, whereas the first tranche of the Osinek loan was paid on 11 May 2009.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je bilo poročilo o oceni vrednosti hangarja F (glej tabelo 1), s katerim je bilo zavarovano posojilo, pripravljeno 1. junija 2009, medtem ko je bil prvi obrok posojila podjetja Osinek plačan 11. maja 2009.
The Czech authorities have submitted a declaration by YBN Consult, dated 6 May 2009, which confirms the value of the collateral used.
Češki organi so predložili izjavo podjetja YBN Consult z dne 6. maja 2009, ki potrjuje vrednost premoženja, s katerim je bilo zavarovano posojilo.
ČSA is in competition with other European Union airlines, in particular since the entry into force of the third stage of liberalisation of air transport (‘third package’) on 1 January 1993.
Podjetje ČSA je konkurenčno drugim letalskim družbam v Evropski uniji, zlasti od začetka veljavnosti tretje faze liberalizacije zračnega prometa („tretji paket“), tj. od 1. januarja 1993.
The measures in question enabled ČSA to continue operating so that it did not have to face, as other competitors did, the consequences normally deriving from its poor financial results.
Zadevni ukrepi so podjetju ČSA omogočili, da je nadaljevalo s poslovanjem in da se mu, za razliko od drugih konkurentov, ni bilo treba spoprijeti s posledicami, ki običajno izhajajo iz slabih finančnih rezultatov.
The Osinek loan was granted in 2009.
Posojilo podjetja Osinek je bilo odobreno leta 2009.
The measure aims therefore at facilitating the access of a firm to external finance at a period of time when the normal functioning of credit markets is severely disturbed because of the financial crisis and when the financial crisis (‘credit crunch’) is affecting the wider economy and leading to severe disturbances of the economy of Member States.
Cilj ukrepa je torej olajšati dostop nekega podjetja do zunanjega financiranja v obdobju, ko je običajno delovanje kreditnih trgov resno moteno zaradi finančne krize in ko finančna kriza („kreditni krč“) vpliva na širše gospodarstvo ter povzroča resne motnje v gospodarstvu držav članic.
First, the contract must have been concluded by 31 December 2010 at the latest.
Prvič, pogodba mora biti sklenjena najpozneje do 31. decembra 2010.
The reduced interest rates may be applied to interest payments before 31 December 2012.
Znižane obrestne mere se lahko uporabljajo za plačila obresti pred 31. decembrom 2012.
The Osinek loan agreement was concluded on 30 April 2009.
Posojilna pogodba s podjetjem Osinek je bila sklenjena 30. aprila 2009.
The loan was supposed to be paid back in one single payment on 30 November 2010.
Posojilo naj bi bilo vrnjeno v enkratnem znesku 30. novembra 2010.
The loan contract therefore fulfils the first condition.
Posojilna pogodba torej izpolnjuje prvi pogoj.
The company made a loss at the end of 2006, but recuperated and showed a positive result for 2007.
Podjetje je konec leta 2006 poslovalo z izgubo, vendar si je nato opomoglo in v letu 2007 doseglo pozitiven rezultat.
A loss of CZK [800-880] million was subsequently recorded at the end of the first quarter of 2008.
Nato je konec prvega četrtletja leta 2008 zabeležilo izgubo v višini [800–880] milijonov CZK.
However, the situation improved by the end of the second quarter, i.e. by 30 June 2008.
Vendar se je stanje do konca drugega četrtletja, tj. do 30. junija 2008, izboljšalo.
A similar trend can be observed in the cash-flow situation.
Podoben trend je bil ugotovljen za denarni tok.
ČSA's turnover diminished slowly on a yearly basis over the observed period.
Prihodki podjetja ČSA so v obravnavanem obdobju na letni osnovi počasi upadali.
In conclusion, the trend in the financial criteria as set out in point 11 of the R&R Guidelines does not clearly point to all the usual signs of a firm being in difficulty before 30 June 2008.
Trend spreminjanja finančnih meril iz točke 11 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje torej ne kaže jasno na vse običajne znake podjetja v težavah pred 30. junijem 2008.
Furthermore, ČSA still had access to finance at that time, as demonstrated by the fact that it was able to obtain a loan from a private bank in September 2008 (see recital 59).
Poleg tega je imelo podjetje ČSA v zadevnem obdobju še vedno dostop do financiranja, kar dokazuje dejstvo, da mu je zasebna banka septembra 2008 odobrila posojilo (glej uvodno izjavo 59).
This Decision does not cover the decollateralisation and the capitalisation of the Osinek loan of 30 June 2010.
Ta sklep ne zajema prenehanja zavarovanja s premoženjem in kapitalizacije posojila podjetja Osinek z dne 30. junija 2010.
The assessment of this measure will be the subject of the final decision in Case SA.30908,
Ocena tega ukrepa bo vključena v končno odločitev v zadevi SA.30908 –
Pavel Štrbík.
Pavel Štrbík pa izvedbo pravne analize.
from 9 December 2009 (3rd Addendum) until 25 January 2010 (4th Addendum) IT
od 9. decembra 2009 (3. dodatek) do 25. januarja 2010 (4. dodatek) Informacijska tehnologija
confirming measures proposed by the Netherlands for the protection of marine areas of conservation in the North Sea Coastal Zone, the Vlakte van de Raan and the Voordelta
o potrditvi ukrepov, ki jih je predložila Nizozemska za varstvo morskih ohranitvenih območij obalnega pasu Severnega morja, Vlakte van de Raan in Voordelta
(notified under document C(2012) 6510)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 6510)
(Only the Danish, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem, danskem, francoskem, nemškem in nizozemskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy [1], and in particular Article 8(3) to (6) and Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike [1] ter zlasti členov 8(3)(6) in 9 Uredbe,
Article 3(2) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [2] requires Member States to contribute to the creation of the network of special areas of conservation called ‘Natura 2000’, hosting the natural habitat types and species listed in the Annexes to that Directive.
Člen 3(2) Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prostoživečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst [2] zahteva, da države članice prispevajo k vzpostavitvi mreže posebnih ohranitvenih območij, imenovane „Natura 2000“, ki jo sestavljajo naravni habitatni tipi in vrste, našteti v prilogah k navedeni direktivi.
Article 6 of the Directive requires Member States, inter alia, to establish, for special areas of conservation, the necessary conservation measures, to take appropriate steps to avoid the deterioration of natural habitats and the habitats of species as well as disturbance of the species for which the areas have been designated and to subject any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon to an appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives and to agree to such a plan or projects only after having ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned.
Člen 6 Direktive od držav članic med drugim zahteva, da za posebna ohranitvena območja določijo potrebne ohranitvene ukrepe, da preprečijo slabšanje stanja naravnih habitatov in habitatov vrst ter vznemirjanje vrst, za katere so bila območja določena, ter glede vsakega načrta ali projekta, ki ni neposredno povezan z upravljanjem območja ali zanj potreben, pa bi lahko pomembno vplival nanje, opravijo ustrezno presojo njegovih vplivov na območje glede na cilje ohranjanja tega območja in se strinjajo s takim načrtom ali projekti šele po preverjanju, da ne bodo škodljivo vplivali na integriteto zadevnega območja.
Article 4 of Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds [3] requires Member States to take special conservation measures concerning the habitat for those species of birds listed in Annex I to the Directive.
Člen 4 Direktive 2009/147/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. novembra 2009 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic [3] zahteva, da države članice sprejmejo posebne ukrepe za habitate vrst ptic, ki so navedene v Prilogi I Direktive.
On 28 February 2008 the Netherlands designated the area called Voordelta as a special area of conservation within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC.
Nizozemska je 28. februarja 2008 določila območje, imenovano Voordelta, za posebno ohranitveno območje v smislu člena 3(2) Direktive 92/43/EGS.
By Commission Decision 2008/914/EC [4] measures proposed by the Netherlands for the conservation of marine ecosystems in the Voordelta area were confirmed.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2008/914/ES [4] so bili potrjeni ukrepi, ki jih je predlagala Nizozemska za ohranjanje morskih ekosistemov na območju Voordelta.
On 25 February 2009 the Netherlands designated the area called North Sea Coastal Zone as a special protection zone under the meaning of Article 3(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC and of Article 3(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC.
Nizozemska je 25. februarja 2009 določila območje, imenovano obalni pas Severnega morja, za posebno ohranitveno območje v smislu člena 3(2) Direktive 92/43/EGS in člena 3(1) Direktive 2009/147/ES.
The Netherlands amended the boundaries of the conservation zone and the conservation objectives on 14 March 2011.
Nizozemska je 14. marca 2011 spremenila meje ohranitvenega območja in cilje ohranjanja.
On 14 March 2011 the Netherlands designated the area called the Vlakte van de Raan as a special protection zone under the meaning of Article 3(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC.
Nizozemska je 14. marca 2011 določila območje, imenovano Vlakte van de Raan, za posebno ohranitveno območje v smislu člena 3(2) Direktive 92/43/EGS.
Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 enables Member States to take non-discriminatory measures to minimise the effect of fishing on the conservation of marine ecosystems within 12 nautical miles, provided that the Union has not adopted measures addressing conservation or management specifically for that area.
Člen 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002 državam članicam omogoča, da sprejmejo nediskriminatorne ukrepe za zmanjšanje vpliva ribolova na ohranjanje morskega ekosistema znotraj 12 navtičnih milj pod pogojem, da Unija ni sprejela ukrepov za ohranjanje ali upravljanje posebej za navedeno območje.
The Member States’ measures must be compatible with the objectives of the common fisheries policy as set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 and no less stringent than existing Union legislation.
Ukrepi držav članic morajo biti skladni s cilji skupne ribiške politike, kot so določeni v členu 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002 in ne smejo biti manj strogi kakor obstoječa zakonodaja Unije.
If the measures apply to fishing vessels from other Member States, they must be notified to the Commission, to the Member States and to the regional advisory councils concerned and be subsequently confirmed by the Commission.
Če ukrepi veljajo za ribiška plovila drugih držav članic, je o njih treba obvestiti Komisijo, države članice in zadevne regionalne svetovalne svete, potem pa jih mora Komisija potrditi.
On 27 August 2012 the Netherlands notified further measures it intends to take in the above three coastal areas to Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the United Kingdom and France, which are the Member States concerned by the measures, as well as to the North Sea Regional Advisory Council and to the European Commission.
Nizozemska je dne 27. avgusta 2012 o nadaljnjih ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti v navedenih treh obalnih območjih obvestila Belgijo, Dansko, Nemčijo, Združeno kraljestvo in Francijo, tj. države članice, ki jih ukrepi zadevajo, ter regionalni svetovalni svet za Severno morje in Evropsko komisijo.
The measures put forward by the Netherlands establish a zoning of the North Sea Coastal Zone.
Ukrepi, ki jih je predložila Nizozemska, določajo razmejitev obalnega pasu Severnega morja.