natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Welcomes the establishment of the Croatian Ministry of Regional Development and EU Funds in December 2011 and the fact that the Minister of Regional Development and EU Funds has also been appointed to serve as a Deputy Prime Minister, which shows the commitment of the new government to the issues of regional development and utilisation of the Union funds;
pozdravlja ustanovitev hrvaškega ministrstva za regionalni razvoj in sklade EU decembra 2011 in dejstvo, da je bil minister za regionalni razvoj in sklade EU imenovan tudi za namestnika predsednika vlade, kar izkazuje zavezanost nove vlade vprašanjem regionalnega razvoja in uporabi skladov Unije;
Notes that Croatia has put considerable effort into the establishment of a sound financial management and control system, which should result in the expected waiver of ex ante controls in the second half of 2012;
ugotavlja, da si je Hrvaška zelo prizadevala za vzpostavitev dobrega sistema za finančno poslovodenje in nadzor, kar bi moralo pripeljati do pričakovane opustitve predhodnega nadzora v drugi polovici leta 2012;
stresses, however, that further sustained action is needed, given that, in most areas, the Commission has not yet authorised Croatia to implement pre-accession assistance without ex ante checks;
kljub temu poudarja, da je potrebno nadaljnje in nezmanjšano ukrepanje, saj Komisija na večini področij Hrvaški še ni dovolila izvrševanja predpristopne pomoči brez predhodnega preverjanja;
Welcomes the fact that as of January 2012, the new Act on Public Procurement has entered into force, ensuring increased transparency, and that 2011 saw the realisation of the IPA 2008 Twinning Light facility project ‘Strengthening Capacities to Remedy Irregularities in Public Procurement Procedures’, which included, inter alia, efforts with regard to awareness-raising;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je januarja 2012 začel veljati novi zakon o javnih naročilih, ki zagotavlja večjo preglednost, leta 2011 pa se je uresničil projekt Twinning Light instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč 2008 z imenom „krepitev zmogljivosti za odpravo nepravilnosti pri postopkih javnih naročil“, ki je med drugim zajemal prizadevanja za ozaveščanje;
Urges the Commission and the Croatian authorities to prioritise the build-up of robust public procurement capacities;
poziva Komisijo in hrvaške oblasti, naj dajo prednost vzpostavitvi trdnih zmogljivosti za javna naročila;
emphasises, in this context, that the fight against corruption plays a central role in the entire accession process, and failure to implement preventive anti-corruption measures will impede the future absorption of Union assistance;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da ima boj proti korupciji osrednjo vlogo v celotnem pristopnem procesu in da bo nadaljnje črpanje pomoči Unije moteno, če preventivni protikorupcijski ukrepi ne bodo sprejeti;
Special Report No 16/2011 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU Financial assistance for the decommissioning of nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia: Achievements and Future Challenges’
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 16/2011 z naslovom „Finančna pomoč EU za razgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem: dosežki in prihodnji izzivi“
Stresses that decommissioning will be an increasingly important issue in the coming years because one third of the 133 nuclear reactors operating in 14 Member States are to be shut down by 2025 [14];
ugotavlja, da bo razgradnja v prihodnjih letih vse pomembnejše vprašanje, saj bo treba tretjino od 133 jedrskih reaktorjev, ki obratujejo v 14 državah članicah, ustaviti do leta 2025 [14];
Calls on its Committee on Budgets and on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy to take into consideration the findings of the Committee on Budgetary Control for the negotiations of the new Multiannual Financial Framework (2014-2020);
poziva Odbor za proračun in Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, naj v pogajanjih o novem večletnem finančnem okviru upoštevata ugotovitve Odbora za proračunski nadzor (2014–2020);
The findings of the Court of Auditors
Ugotovitve Računskega sodišča
Considers that the Court of Auditors’ findings can be summarised as follows:
meni, da je mogoče ugotovitve Računskega sodišča strniti, kot sledi:
As a result of a relatively loose policy framework, the programmes do not benefit from a comprehensive needs assessment, prioritisation, the setting of specific objectives and results to be achieved.
Zaradi relativno ohlapnega političnega okvira se programi ne morejo opreti na celovito oceno potreb, določitev prednosti ter zastavljanje posebnih ciljev in rezultatov, ki jih je treba doseči.
Responsibilities are diffused, in particular with regard to monitoring and the achievement of programme objectives a whole.
Odgovornosti, zlasti kar zadeva spremljanje in dosego ciljev programa kot celote, so razpršene.
The Commission’s supervision focuses on the budgetary execution and project implementation.
Nadzor Komisije se osredotoča na izvrševanje proračuna in izvajanje projektov.
There is no comprehensive assessment concerning the progress of the decommissioning and mitigation process.
Celovita ocena napredka procesov razgradnje in blaženja posledic ne obstaja.
Delays and cost overruns were noted for key infrastructure projects.
Pri bistvenih infrastrukturnih projektih so bile opažene zamude in prekoračitve stroškov.
Al though the reactors were shut down between 2002 and 2009, the programmes have not yet triggered the required organisational changes to allow the operators to turn into effective decommissioning organisations.
Čeprav so bili reaktorji med letoma 2002 in 2009 ustavljeni, v programih še niso bile sprožene potrebne organizacijske spremembe, ki bi upravljavcem omogočile, da bi postali uspešne organizacije za razgradnjo.
Currently available financial resources (including an EU contribution until 2013 worth 2,85 billion euro) will be insufficient and the funding shortfall is significant (around 2,5 billion euro).’
Finančni viri, ki so trenutno na voljo (vključno s prispevkom EU do leta 2013 v višini 2,85 milijarde EUR), ne bodo zadoščali in primanjkljaj sredstev je precejšen (približno 2,5 milijarde EUR).
Notes, furthermore, that the funding scheme put forward by the Commission was not the subject of a comprehensive ex-ante evaluation;
ugotavlja tudi, da shema financiranja, ki jo je predložila Komisija, ni bila izčrpno predhodno ocenjena;
Parliament’s conclusions
Sklepi Parlamenta
Acknowledges that the situation described in the Court of Auditors’ report refers to the period until the end of 2010 and that subsequently, the Commission has taken a number of initiatives;
se zaveda, da so bile razmere, ki jih Računsko sodišče omenja v poročilu, takšne do konca leta 2010 in da je Komisija zatem sprejela številne pobude;
Notes that the Union’s overall objective in the nuclear field is to maximise nuclear safety;
je seznanjen s tem, da je splošni cilj Unije na jedrskem področju čim bolj povečati jedrsko varnost;
Notes the Commission’s opinion that it has put in place a procedural framework that sets specific objectives, defines roles and responsibilities and clearly defines the reporting and supervision requirements [16];
je seznanjen z mnenjem Komisije, da je vzpostavila postopkovni okvir, ki določa posebne cilje, opredeljuje vloge in odgovornosti ter postavlja jasne zahteve za poročanje in nadzor [16];
Notes the Commission’s reply explaining that the needs assessment was part of the impact assessment (SEC(2011) 1387) conducted in 2011;
je seznanjen z odgovorom Komisije, v katerem je pojasnila, da je bila ocena potreb del ocene učinka (SEC(2011) 1387), opravljene v letu 2011;
notes that the impact assessment covered progress achieved so far, remaining challenges and an overview of the funding situation;
ugotavlja, da je ocena učinka obsegala doseženi napredek, preostale izzive in pregled stanja financiranja;
Recalls that the Accession Treaties of Bulgaria and Slovakia establish the limits for providing Union financial assistance to 2009 and 2006 respectively;
opozarja, da pristopni pogodbi z Bolgarijo in Slovaško določata omejitve za zagotavljanje finančne pomoči Unije do leta 2009 oziroma 2006;
Welcomes the proposal for a Council Regulation on Union support for the nuclear decommissioning assistance programme in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia (COM(2011) 783) that draws on extensive consultation with stakeholders, the Member States concerned — Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia — and expert groups in decommissioning;
pozdravlja predlog uredbe Sveta o podpori Unije za programe pomoči pri razgradnji jedrskih elektrarn v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem (COM(2011) 783), ki je nastal na osnovi obsežnih posvetov z interesnimi skupinami, udeleženimi državami članicami – Bolgarijo, Litvo in Slovaško – ter skupinami strokovnjakov za razgradnjo;
welcomes the fact that the findings of Parliament’s Resolution of 5 April 2011 [17] and the conclusion and recommendations from the Court of Auditors’ decommissioning performance audit of 2011 were used as input;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bile pri tem upoštevane tudi ugotovitve iz resolucije Parlamenta z dne 5. aprila 2011 [17] ter sklepi in priporočila iz revizije uspešnosti razgradnje, ki jo je Računsko sodišče opravilo leta 2011;
Observes that experts called for a solid and complete detailed decommissioning plan as the basis for the implementation of further Union support, including full costing estimates up to the completion date for decommissioning;
ugotavlja, da so strokovnjaki pozvali k sprejetju zanesljivega in celovitega podrobnega načrta razgradnje kot podlage za izvajanje nadaljnje podpore Unije, vključno s popolno oceno stroškov do zaključka razgradnje;
considers that a clear indication of national co-financing and the way to secure this national funding in the long term should be provided;
meni, da bi bilo treba jasno navesti nacionalno sofinanciranje ter način, kako ga dolgoročno zagotoviti;
Notes with satisfaction that the key milestones, as defined in the Commission’s abovementioned impact assessment [18], were explicitly supported by stakeholders, as well as targeting Union support on the accomplishment of concrete milestones with the highest Union added value;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so interesne skupine izrecno podprle glavne mejnike, ki jih je Komisija opredelila v omenjeni oceni učinka [18], pa tudi osredotočenje podpore Unije za dosego konkretnih mejnikov z največjo dodano vrednostjo Unije;
notes that compliance procedures and close cost monitoring should be considered from the outset;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba postopke za skladnost in pozorno spremljanje stroškov upoštevati že od začetka;
Reiterates and stresses mutual commitments taken by the Union and Bulgaria, Slovakia and Lithuania with regard to decommissioning of, respectively, four units of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2 of Bohunice V1 Nuclear Power Plant and Units 1 and 2 of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant;
ponavlja in poudarja vzajemne zaveze, ki so jih sprejele Unija ter Bolgarija, Slovaška in Litva glede razgradnje štirih enot jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj, enote 1 in 2 jedrske elektrarne Bohunice V1 ter enote 1 in 2 jedrske elektrarne Ignalina;
Deplores the fact that in the case of Ignalina nuclear power plant, highly relevant projects such as B1 and B234 have encountered serious delays due to technical and commercial disputes, which have generated extensive economical damage, as well as discontinuity in the decommissioning process;
obžaluje, da je v primeru jedrske elektrarne Ignalina zaradi tehničnih in trgovinskih sporov prišlo do hude zamude pri izjemno pomembnih projektih, kot sta B1 in B234, to pa je povzročilo obsežno gospodarsko škodo in prekinilo proces razgradnje;
Believes the roadmap with agreed technical solutions decided upon in July 2012 by Ignalina nuclear power plant and NUKEM/GNS to be an important step forward in the process of overcoming the stalemate related to the B1 interim spent fuel storage facility;
meni, da je načrt s tehničnimi rešitvami, o katerem so se julija 2012 dogovorili v jedrski elektrarni Ignalina in NUKEM/GNS, pomemben korak naprej v prizadevanjih za premik z mrtve točke v zvezi z začasnim skladiščem izrabljenega goriva B1;
Deplores the fact that the detailed progress report on the implementation of the roadmap, expected on 5 October 2012, has not met the deadline;
obžaluje dejstvo, da podrobno poročilo o napredku pri izvajanju načrta, ki bi moralo biti posredovano 5. oktobra 2012, ni bilo pripravljeno v roku;
Welcomes the progress achieved on some of the issues covered by the roadmap, such as the validation of casks and enhancement measures related to the cranes;
pozdravlja napredek, dosežen pri nekaterih vprašanjih iz načrta, na primer pri potrjevanju posod ter izboljševalnih ukrepih v zvezi z žerjavi;
Remains concerned, however, that outstanding issues such as the shock absorbers problem and the handling of leaking and damaged fuel have not yet been agreed upon, and therefore hinder the swift implementation of the above-mentioned roadmap;
vseeno ostaja zaskrbljen, saj se stranema še ni uspelo dogovoriti o nerešenih vprašanjih, kot je težava glede blažilnikov oziroma ravnanje v primeru uhajanja ali poškodovanega goriva, to pa ovira hiter začetek izvajanja zgoraj navedenega načrta;
Urges both parties involved to conclude a swift and timely agreement on all remaining issues;
poziva sodelujoči strani, naj se hitro in pravočasno sporazumeta o vseh še nerešenih vprašanjih;
Supports the findings of the fact-finding mission of the Committee on Budgetary Control to Lithuania on 10 to 12 July 2012 and in that respect, believes that the Union’s financial assistance should be suspended until a settlement is reached in the case of the B1 and B234 projects;
podpira ugotovitve misije za ugotavljanje dejstev od 10. do 12. julija 2012, ki jo je v Litvo napotil Odbor za proračunski nadzor, in v zvezi s tem meni, da bi bilo treba začasno ustaviti finančno pomoč Unije, dokler se ne doseže dogovor o projektih B1 in B234;
Supports the Commission’s proposal on allocating an additional EUR 230 million for the Ignalina nuclear power plant for the 2014 to 2017 period;
podpira predlog Komisije o tem, da se jedrski elektrarni Ignalina v obdobju 2014–2017 nameni dodatnih 230 milijonov EUR;
reiterates that money should only be allocated if the ex-ante conditionalities as set out in the aforementioned proposal for a Council regulation have been fulfilled;
znova poudarja, da sme biti denar dodeljen samo v primeru, da bodo izpolnjeni vnaprejšnji pogoji iz omenjenega predloga uredbe Sveta;
believes that financial assistance from the Union should be concluded after that date;
meni, da se mora po tem datumu finančna pomoč Unije končati;
Insists that the decommissioning activity should be planned in a safe and efficient way that would enable a swift release of the decommissioning licence, according to the timetables set in the respective decommissioning plans;
vztraja, da je treba dejavnosti razgradnje načrtovati na varen in učinkovit način, ki bo omogočil hitro izdajo dovoljenja za razgradnjo, v skladu z urniki v načrtih razgradnje;
Calls on the Commission to send Parliament an estimate of the funding required for the irreversible and complete dismantling of the three nuclear power plants;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu posreduje oceno finančnih potreb za nepreklicno in popolno razgradnjo treh jedrskih elektrarn;
Recalls that only national nuclear regulatory authorities can issue decommissioning licences to legal persons in strict compliance with the corresponding national legislation;
opozarja, da lahko dovoljenje za razgradnjo izdajo le nacionalni upravni organi za jedrsko varnost, in sicer pravnim osebam ob doslednem spoštovanju ustrezne nacionalne zakonodaje;
Calls on the Government of Lithuania to establish an independent project management team for projects B1 and B234;
poziva litovsko vlado, naj imenuje neodvisno ekipo za vodenje projektov B1 in B234;
notes that the independent management of projects implemented by the Ignalina nuclear power plant should also be established, as proposed by the Lithuanian National Audit Office;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti tudi neodvisno vodenje projektov, ki jih izvajajo v jedrski elektrarni Ignalina, kot je predlagal litovski državni revizijski organ;
Requests that a clear, unequivocal deadline for acquiring the decommissioning licences be set, if not yet done;
zahteva, da se postavi jasen in brezpogojen rok za pridobitev dovoljenja za razgradnjo, če to še ni bilo storjeno;
Notes with concern that there are delays in building and completing interim facilities to store used fuel and unless such facilities are available, nuclear fuel rods cannot be removed;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je prišlo do zamud pri gradnji in dokončanju začasnih objektov za hrambo rabljenega goriva, saj jedrskih gorivnih palic ne bo mogoče odstraniti, če ti objekti ne bodo na voljo;
notes that as regards the Ignalina power plant, the removal and safe interim storage of nuclear rods from Unit 2 must be a priority;
ugotavlja, da mora biti, ko gre za jedrsko elektrarno Ignalina, prednostna naloga odstranitev in varna začasna hramba jedrskih gorivnih palic iz enote 2;
Requests that disagreements on the interpretation of treaties, the awarding of contracts and the ongoing technical and commercial disputes between the Ignalina nuclear power plant and the main contractor for the two projects be submitted to an arbitration procedure;
zahteva, da se o sporih glede tolmačenja pogodb in dodeljevanja del ter nenehnih tehničnih in trgovinskih nesporazumih med jedrsko elektrarno Ignalina in glavnim izvajalcem obeh projektov odloča v arbitražnem postopku;
notes that any additional Union financial assistance should be suspended until the dispute is settled;
meni, da je treba dodatno finančno pomoč Unije odložiti, dokler spor ne bo rešen;
calls on the Commission to report annually to Parliament on the state of play;
poziva Komisijo, naj vsako leto pripravi poročilo o trenutnem stanju in ga posreduje Parlamentu;
Is deeply concerned that the Court of Auditors estimated the financial shortfall for the completion of the decommissioning projects at EUR 2500 million, thus creating a considerable funding gap;
je globoko zaskrbljen zaradi ocene Računskega sodišča, da za dokončanje projektov razgradnje primanjkuje še 2500 milijonov EUR; meni, da gre za precejšen primanjkljaj;
Calls on the Commission to cooperate with the governments of Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia and to maximise progress in the decommissioning of nuclear power stations by making available sufficient funding by 2017 or, where appropriate, by 2020;
poziva Komisijo, naj sodeluje z vladami Bolgarije, Litve in Slovaške ter zagotovi zadostna finančna sredstva do leta 2017 oziroma 2020, da bi v čim večji meri uresničili cilj razgradnje jedrskih elektrarn;
calls on the Commission, furthermore, to set ambitious implementation targets and monitor progress towards those targets;
prav tako poziva Komisijo, naj določi ambiciozne cilje in spremlja napredek pri njihovem uresničevanju;
takes the view that penalties must be applied in the case of failure to meet those targets;
meni, da je treba v primeru neizpolnitve teh ciljev sprejeti sankcije;
calls for an annual report on the progress made to be submitted to Parliament;
v zvezi s tem zahteva, da se Parlamentu vsako leto poroča o napredku;
Notes that since the decommissioning of nuclear power stations in Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria began, the responsibility and obligations of the participating Member States in the decommissioning process has not been clearly defined;
ugotavlja, da že vse od začetka razgradnje jedrskih elektrarn v Litvi, na Slovaškem in v Bolgariji odgovornosti in dolžnosti držav, ki sodelujejo pri procesu razgradnje, niso bile jasno opredeljene;
notes that the burden arising from responsibility for the whole decommissioning process which close their nuclear power stations has been disproportionate on Member States;
ugotavlja tudi, da je bilo breme, ki izhaja iz odgovornosti celotnega procesa razgradnje, za države članice, ki zapirajo svoje jedrske elektrarne, nesorazmerno;
Welcomes the fact that the abovementioned proposal for a Council regulation (COM(2011) 783) not only sets general objectives but also sets specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and timed objectives for the three Member States;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da omenjeni predlog uredbe Sveta (COM(2011) 783) ne določa zgolj splošnih ciljev, ampak tudi specifične, merljive, dosegljive, zadevne in časovno določene cilje za te tri države članice;
notes that further objectives and performance indicators will be defined on the project level, in the implementing measures and the annual work programmes;
ugotavlja, da bodo nadaljnji cilji in kazalniki uspešnosti določeni na ravni projekta, v izvedbenih ukrepih in v letnih delovnih programih;
Takes the view that in the proposal for a Council regulation, the legal basis for the granting of additional funding to the Ignalina programme should be Protocol No 4 of the Act of Accession and not Article 203 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community;
meni, da bi moral biti v predlogu uredbe Sveta pravna podlaga za dodeljevanje dodatnih sredstev za program Ignalina protokol št. 4 k aktu o pristopu, in ne člen 203 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo;
Welcomes the fact that no later than the end of 2015, an evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, at the level of results and impacts, the efficient use of resources and its Union added value, in view of a decision amending or suspending the measures;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da naj bi Komisija najpozneje do konca leta 2015 pripravila poročilo o vrednotenju v zvezi z doseganjem ciljev vseh ukrepov na ravni rezultatov in učinkov, učinkovitostjo porabe sredstev in njeno evropsko dodano vrednostjo, na podlagi tega poročila pa sprejela odločitev glede spremembe ali odprave ukrepov;
asks the Commission to provide it with a copy of the evaluation report;
poziva Komisijo, naj mu posreduje izvod ocenjevalnega poročila;
Calls on the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to make its reports on project implementation in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia available to Parliament;
poziva Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj (EBRD), naj Parlamentu posreduje svoja poročila o izvajanju projektov v Bolgariji, Litvi in na Slovaškem;
Asks the Commission and the Court of Auditors to assess the added-value of the cooperation with the EBRD, and its capacity to act as administrator of funds, given that the Union supplies 96 % of funding;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj ocenita dodano vrednost sodelovanja z EBRD in sposobnost te banke, da deluje kot upraviteljica sredstev, glede na to, da Unija zagotavlja 96 % financiranja;
Calls on the Commission to draw up a report on the decommissioning processes in those three countries;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi poročilo o procesu razgradnje v teh treh državah;
calls on the Commission to also draw up a report on the decommissioning of the nuclear power plant in Greifswald, with a view to establishing technical and organisational best practice, thereby creating a reference base for future decommissioning projects;
poziva jo tudi, naj pripravi poročilo o razgradnji jedrske elektrarne v Greifswaldu, da bi določili najboljše tehnične in organizacijske prakse ter s tem referenčno osnovo za prihodnje projekte razgradnje;
Special Report No 1/2012 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘Effectiveness of European Union development aid for food security in sub-Saharan Africa’
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 1/2012 z naslovom „Uspešnost razvojne pomoči Evropske unije za zanesljivo preskrbo s hrano v podsaharski Afriki“