natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up by Article 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [11],
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi člena 51(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [11] –
The regions where the collection and transmission of data to the Visa Information System (VIS) shall start, after the regions determined by Implementing Decision 2012/274/EU, according to Article 48(3) of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008, are the following:
Za regijami iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/274/EU se zbiranje podatkov in njihovo pošiljanje v vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS) v skladu s členom 48(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008 začne v naslednjih regijah:
The 12th region:
dvanajsta regija:
Panama.
Panama,
The 13th region:
trinajsta regija:
Mexico,
Mehika,
United States.
Združene države Amerike,
The 14th region:
štirinajsta regija:
Antigua and Barbuda,
Antigva in Barbuda,
Dominican Republic,
Dominikanska republika,
Saint Kitts and Nevis,
Saint Kitts in Nevis,
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines,
Saint Vincent in Grenadine,
Trinidad and Tobago.
Trinidad in Tobago,
The 15th region:
petnajsta regija:
Australia,
Avstralija,
Marshall Islands,
Marshallovi otoki,
New Zealand,
Nova Zelandija,
Solomon Islands,
Salomonovi otoki,
Timor-Leste,
Vzhodni Timor,
Vanuatu.
Vanuatu,
The 16th region:
šestnajsta regija:
Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Bosna in Hercegovina,
former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia(FYROM),
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija,
Montenegro,
Črna gora,
Turkey.
Turčija,
The 17th region:
sedemnajsta regija:
Belarus,
Belorusija,
Republic of Moldova,
Republika Moldavija,
Ukraine.
Ukrajina,
The 18th region:
osemnajsta regija:
Russia.
Rusija,
The 19th region:
devetnajsta regija:
China,
Kitajska,
Japan,
Japonska,
North Korea,
Severna Koreja,
Taiwan.
Tajvan,
The 20th region:
dvajseta regija:
Sri-Lanka.
Šrilanka,
The 21st region:
enaindvajseta regija:
Holy See,
Sveti sedež,
San Marino.
San Marino,
The 22nd region:
dvaindvajseta regija:
United Kingdom.
Združeno kraljestvo,
The 23rd region:
triindvajseta regija:
Bulgaria,
Bolgarija,
Croatia,
Hrvaška,
Cyprus,
Ciper,
Greece,
Grčija,
Iceland,
Islandija,
Portugal,
Portugalska,
Romania,
Romunija,
Slovakia,
Slovaška,
Spain,
Španija,
Switzerland.
Švica.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Belgijo, Republiko Bolgarijo, Češko republiko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Republiko Estonijo, Helensko republiko, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Republiko Hrvaško, Italijansko republiko, Republiko Ciper, Republiko Latvijo, Republiko Litvo, Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg, Madžarsko, Republiko Malto, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Republiko Avstrijo, Republiko Poljsko, Portugalsko republiko, Romunijo, Republiko Slovenijo, Slovaško republiko, Republiko Finsko in Kraljevino Švedsko.
This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.
To poimenovanje ne posega v stališča glede statusa ter je v skladu z RVSZN 1244/1999 in mnenjem Meddržavnega sodišča o razglasitvi neodvisnosti Kosova.
on a measure taken by Finland according to Article 11 of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to a screw conveyor for carrots and kohlrabi
o ukrepu v zvezi s polžnim transporterjem za korenje in kolerabo, ki ga je v skladu s členom 11 Direktive 2006/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta sprejela Finska
(notified under document C(2013) 6392)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 6392)
Having regard to Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC [1], and in particular Article 11 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o strojih in spremembah Direktive 95/16/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 11 Direktive,
In accordance with the procedure set out in Article 11(2) of Directive 2006/42/EC, the Finnish authorities notified to the Commission and to the other Member States a measure relating to a screw conveyor for carrots and kohlrabi of the type TSF 350 manufactured by Cabinplant A/S, Foresbjergvej 9, 5683 Haarby, Denmark
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 11(2) Direktive 2006/42/ES so finski organi obvestili Komisijo in druge države članice o ukrepu, ki se nanaša na polžni transporter za korenje in kolerabo tipa TSF 350, ki ga proizvaja Cabinplant A/S, Foresbjergvej 9, 5683 Haarby, Danska
The machinery bore the CE marking and was accompanied by an EC Declaration of conformity.
Stroj je imel oznako CE in priložena mu je bila izjava ES o skladnosti.
The measure was motivated by the non-conformity of the machinery with the following essential health and safety requirements of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC:
Ukrep je bil sprejet zaradi neskladnosti stroja z naslednjimi bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varnostnimi zahtevami iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES:
Risks related to moving parts
Tveganje, povezano z gibajočimi se deli,
Choice of protection against risks arising from moving parts
Izbira zaščite pred tveganjem zaradi gibajočih se delov,
Interlocking moveable guards
Pomična zaporna varovala,
and (e) — Foodstuffs machinery — cleaning.
in (e) Stroji za predelavo živil – čiščenje.
The measure followed an accident that occurred during cleaning of the machinery when the operator reached into the drainpipe of the conveyor to free blocked vegetables while the screw was running, sustaining injuries to his fingers.
Ukrep je bil sprejet zaradi nezgode, ki se je zgodila med čiščenjem stroja, ko je upravljavec segel v odtočno cev transporterja, da bi odstranil zagozdeno zelenjavo, medtem ko se je polž vrtel, pri čemer si je poškodoval prste.
The flap preventing access to the drain pipe was a fixed guard.
Pri loputi, ki je preprečevala dostop do odtočne cevi, je šlo za fiksno zaščito.
Since it had to be opened several times per day for cleaning, the Finnish authorities considered that an interlocking moveable guard should be fitted.
Ker jo je bilo zaradi čiščenja treba odpreti večkrat dnevno, so finski organi menili, da bi bilo treba namestiti gibljivo zaščito.
Furthermore, the Finnish authorities noted that the machine could not be effectively cleaned while at a standstill as specified in the instructions.
Finski organi so tudi navedli, da stroja med mirovanjem ni bilo mogoče ustrezno očistiti, kot je bilo opredeljeno v navodilih.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2006/42/EC, the Commission asked the manufacturer Cabinplant A/S to present his observations on the measure.
V skladu s členom 11(3) Direktive 2006/42/ES je Komisija proizvajalca Cabinplant A/S zaprosila za mnenje glede ukrepa.
The manufacturer replied that the type TSF 350 screw conveyor had been designed and manufactured by a supplier and purchased by Cabinplant A/S for fitting into an integrated system.
Proizvajalec je odgovoril, da je polžni transporter tipa TSF 350 zasnoval in izdelal dobavitelj, podjetje Cabinplant A/S pa ga je kupilo za namestitev v integriran sistem.
He stated if future screw conveyors of this type were purchased he would ensure that they complied with the requirements of Directive 2006/42/EC.
Navedel je, da bo v primeru prihodnje nabave polžnih transporterjev tega tipa poskrbel za skladnost z zahtevami Direktive 2006/42/ES.
Examination of the evidence provided by the Finnish authorities and of the observations communicated by the manufacturer confirms that the screw conveyor of the type TSF 350 not fitted with an interlocking moveable guard to prevent access to the drainpipe while the screw is running fails to comply with the essential health and safety requirements of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC and that this non-conformity gives rise to a serious risk of injury to operators,
Pregled dokazil, ki so jih predložili finski organi, in mnenja, ki ga je sporočil proizvajalec, potrjuje, da polžni transporter tipa TSF 350, ki ni opremljen z gibljivo zaščito za preprečitev dostopa do odtočne cevi, medtem ko se polž vrti, ne izpolnjuje bistvenih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES in da ta neskladnost povzroča resno tveganje za poškodbe upravljavcev –
The measure taken by the Finnish authorities prohibiting the placing on the market of screw conveyors of the type TSF 350 not fitted with an interlocking moveable guard to prevent access to the drainpipe while the screw is running is justified.
Ukrep finskih oblasti, ki prepoveduje dajanje na trg polžnega transporterja tipa TSF 350, ki ni opremljen z gibljivo zaščito za preprečitev dostopa do odtočne cevi, medtem ko se polž vrti, je upravičen.
Done at Brussels, 9 October 2013.
V Bruslju, 9. oktobra 2013
on a measure taken by Finland according to Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council prohibiting a type of wedge splitter
o prepovedi tipa cepilnika s klinom, ki jo je v skladu z Direktivo 2006/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta sprejela Finska
(notified under document C(2013) 6442)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 6442)
Having regard to Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC [1] and in particular Article 11 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o strojih in spremembah Direktive 95/16/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 11 te direktive,
In accordance with the procedure set out in Article 11(2) of Directive 2006/42/EC, the Finnish authorities notified to the Commission and to the other Member States a measure prohibiting the placing on the market and use of a hydraulic wedge splitter of the type Hakki Pilke Z100 manufactured by Maaselän Kone Oy, Valimotie 1, FI-85800 Haapajärvi, SUOMI/FINLAND
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 11(2) Direktive 2006/42/ES so finski organi obvestili Komisijo in druge države članice o ukrepu, ki prepoveduje dajanje na trg in uporabo hidravličnega cepilnika s klinom tipa Hakki Pilke Z100, ki ga proizvaja Maaselän Kone Oy, Valimotie 1, FI-85800 Haapajärvi, FINSKA
, and requiring the manufacturer to take corrective action with respect to machines already placed on the market.
, in od proizvajalca zahteva, da sprejme popravne ukrepe za stroje, ki so že bili dani na trg.
The reason for the measure given by the Finnish authorities is the non-conformity of the machinery with the following essential health and safety requirements of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC (with reference to the specifications of standards EN 609-1 — Agricultural and forestry machinery — Safety of log splitters – Part 1: Wedge splitters, and EN 574 — Safety of machinery — Two-hand control devices – Functional aspects — Principles for design):
Razlog za ukrep, ki so ga navedli finski organi, je neskladnost stroja z naslednjimi bistvenimi varnostnimi in zdravstvenimi zahtevami iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES (s sklicem na zahteve iz standarda EN 609-1: Kmetijski in gozdarski stroji, Varnost cepilnikov lesa, 1. del: Cepilniki s klinom ter EN 574: Varnost strojev, Dvoročne krmilne naprave, Funkcionalni vidiki, Načela načrtovanja):
Principles of safety integration;
Načela vključevanja varnosti;
Control devices;
Krmilne naprave;
Starting;
Zagon;
Risks related to moving parts;
Tveganje, povezano z gibajočimi se deli;
Special requirements for protective devices.
Posebne zahteve za varovalne naprave.
The measure taken by the Finnish authorities followed an enquiry into a serious accident when the levers of the two-hand control device used to start the machinery were tied together.
Finski organi so sprejeli ukrep po preiskavi resne nezgode, kjer sta ročici dvoročne krmilne naprave, potrebni za zagon stroja, bili spojeni.
The Finnish authorities considered that the two-hand control device fitted to the machinery was not designed to avoid being easily defeated or actuated by one hand or by other parts of the body.
Finske oblasti so menile, da dvoročna krmilna naprava, pritrjena na stroj, ni bila zasnovana tako, da bi onemogočala enostavno premaknitev ali zagon z eno roko ali drugimi deli telesa.
The Commission wrote to the manufacturer inviting him to communicate his observations on the measure taken by Finland.
Komisija je proizvajalca pisno pozvala, naj ji sporoči svoje pripombe glede ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela Finska.
In his reply, the manufacturer indicated that, following the measure, he had brought the design of the machinery into conformity for products manufactured from the autumn of 2010 and proposed corrective measures to deal with machines placed on the market before that date.
V svojem odgovoru je proizvajalec navedel, da je po sprejetju ukrepa zasnovo stroja uskladil za vse stroje, proizvedene od jeseni 2010, in predlagal popravne ukrepe za stroje, ki so bili dani na trg pred navedenim datumom.
Since the summer of 2011, the wedge splitter has been sold with the reference Hakki Pilke HH100.
Od poletja 2011 se cepilnik s klinom prodaja pod oznako Hakki Pilke HH100.
The Finnish authorities have confirmed that the wedge splitters of the types Hakki Pilke Z100 and HH100 placed on the market since the autumn of 2010 comply with the requirements of Directive 2006/42/EC and that consequently the prohibition on the placing on the market and use of those machines has been lifted.
Finske oblasti so potrdile, da so cepilniki s klinom tipa Hakki Pilke Z100 in HH100, dani na trg od jeseni 2010, skladni z zahtevami Direktive 2006/42/ES in je prepoved dajanja na trg in uporabe navedenih strojev zato bila umaknjena.
However, the obligation to recall and bring into conformity wedge splitters manufactured before the autumn of 2010 remains in force.
Toda še vedno ostaja v veljavi obveznost odpoklica cepilnikov s klinom, proizvedenih pred jesenjo 2010, in zagotovitve njihove skladnosti.
Examination of the evidence provided by the Finnish authorities and of the observations communicated by the manufacturer confirms that wedge splitters of the type Hakki Pilke Z100 with a two-hand control device that can be easily defeated or actuated by one hand or by other parts of the body do not comply with the essential health and safety requirements of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC and that this non-conformity gives rise to a serious risk of injury to users,
Pregled dokazil, ki so jih predložile finske oblasti, in ugotovitev proizvajalca potrjuje, da cepilniki s klinom tipa Hakki Pilke Z100 z dvoročno krmilno napravo, ki jo je možno enostavno premakniti ali zagnati z eno roko ali drugimi deli telesa, niso skladni z bistvenimi varnostnimi in zdravstvenimi zahtevami iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES ter da ta neskladnost za uporabnika predstavlja resno tveganje poškodb –
The measure taken by the Finnish authorities prohibiting the placing on the market and use of wedge splitters of the type Hakki Pilke Z100 with a two-hand control device that can be easily defeated or actuated by one hand or by other parts of the body, and requiring the manufacturer to recall or bring into conformity non-compliant products already placed on the market is justified.
Ukrep finskih oblasti, ki prepoveduje dajanje na trg ter uporabo cepilnikov s klinom tipa Hakki Pilke Z100 z dvoročno krmilno napravo, ki jo je možno enostavno premakniti ali zagnati z eno roko ali drugimi deli telesa, in ki od proizvajalca zahteva odpoklic ali zagotovitev skladnosti neskladnih izdelkov, ki so že bili dani na trg, je upravičen.
on subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures
o uvedbi nadzornih ukrepov za 5-(2-aminopropil)indol
Having regard to the proposal of the European Commission,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske komisije,
A Risk Assessment Report on the new psychoactive substance 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole was drawn up in accordance with Article 6 of Decision 2005/387/JHA by the extended Scientific Committee of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) during a special session, and was subsequently submitted to the Commission and to the Council on 16 April 2013.
Poročilo o oceni tveganja glede nove psihoaktivne snovi 5-(2-aminopropil)indola je v skladu s členom 6 Sklepa 2005/387/PNZ oblikoval znanstveni odbor Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction - EMCDDA) na posebni seji ter je bilo nato 16. aprila 2013 predloženo Komisiji in Svetu.
The substance 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole is a synthetic derivative of indole substituted at the phenyl side of the indole ring system.
Snov 5-(2-aminopropil)indol je sintetični derivat indola, substituiran na fenilni strani indolnega obroča.
It appears to be a stimulant substance that may also have hallucinogenic effects.
Kaže, da gre za poživilo, ki lahko povzroča tudi halucinogene učinke.
It has also been detected in samples of a product sold as a ‘legal high’ called ‘Benzo Fury’, and in tablets resembling ecstasy.
Njegova prisotnost je bila ugotovljena tudi v vzorcih izdelka z imenom „Benzo Fury“, ki se prodaja kot neprepovedana droga, in v tabletah, podobnih ekstaziju.
The existing information and data suggest that the acute toxicity of 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole can provoke adverse effects in humans, such as tachycardia and hyperthermia, and may also cause mydriasis, agitation and tremor.
Obstoječe informacije in podatki nakazujejo, da lahko akutna toksičnost 5-(2-aminopropil)indola pri človeku povzroči škodljive učinke, kot sta tahikardija in hipertermija, lahko pa povzroči tudi midriazo, vznemirjenost in tremor.
5-(2-aminopropyl)indole may interact with other substances, including medical products and stimulants that act on the monoaminergic system.
Med 5-(2-aminopropil)indolom in drugimi snovmi, vključno z medicinskimi proizvodi in poživili, ki delujejo na monoaminergični sistem, lahko pride do interakcije.
The specific physical effects of 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole in humans are difficult to determine because there are no published studies assessing its acute and chronic toxicity, its psychological and behavioural effects, or dependence potential, and because of the limited information and data available.
Posebne fizične učinke 5-(2-aminopropil)indola pri človeku je težko določiti, saj ni objavljenih študij, ki bi ocenjevale njegovo akutno in kronično toksičnost, njegove psihične in vedenjske učinke ali možnosti za zasvojitev, in ker razpolagamo le z omejenimi informacijami in podatki.
There have been a total of 24 fatalities registered in four Member States from April to August 2012, in relation to which 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole alone, or in combination with other substances, was detected in post-mortem samples.
V štirih državah članicah je bilo od aprila do avgusta 2012 zabeleženih skupaj 24 smrtnih primerov, pri katerih je bila pri obdukciji ugotovljena prisotnost 5-(2-aminopropil)indola samega ali v kombinaciji z drugimi snovmi.
While it is not possible to determine with certainty the role of 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole in all of the fatalities, in some cases it has been specifically noted in the cause of death.
Čeprav ni možno z gotovostjo določiti vloge 5-(2-aminopropil)indola pri vseh smrtnih primerih, je bil ta v nekaterih primerih izrecno naveden kot vzrok smrti.
If this new psychoactive substance were to become more widely available and used, the implications for individual and public health could be significant.
Če bi ta nova psihoaktivna snov postala dostopnejša in bi se krog njenih uporabnikov razširil, bi to lahko imelo resne posledice za zdravje posameznikov in javno zdravje.
There is no information available on the social risks posed by 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole.
Informacij o socialnih tveganjih zaradi 5-(2-aminopropil)indola ni na voljo.
Nine European countries have reported to the EMCDDA and to the European Police Office (Europol) that they reported detection of 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole.
Devet evropskih držav je poročalo EMCDDA ter Evropskemu policijskemu uradu (Europol), da so ugotovile prisotnost 5-(2-aminopropil)indola.
No prevalence data is available on the use of 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole, but the limited information that exists suggests that it may be consumed in similar environments as other stimulants, such as in the home, in bars and nightclubs or at music festivals.
Ni podatkov o razširjenosti uporabe 5-(2-aminopropil)indola, vendar obstoječe omejene informacije nakazujejo, da se lahko uživa v podobnih okoljih kot druga poživila, kot na primer doma, v barih in nočnih klubih ter na glasbenih festivalih.
There is no information that suggests that 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole is manufactured in the Union, and there is no evidence suggesting the involvement of organised crime in the manufacture, distribution or supply of this new psychoactive substance.
Nobena informacija ne nakazuje, da se 5-(2-aminopropil)indol proizvaja v Uniji, ni pa tudi dokazov o tem, da bi bil v proizvodnjo, distribucijo ali dobavo te nove psihoaktivne snovi vpleten organizirani kriminal.
The substance 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole has no known, established or acknowledged medical value or use, and there is no marketing authorisation covering this new psychoactive substance in the Union.
Snov 5-(2-aminopropil)indol nima znane, dokazane ali priznane zdravstvene vrednosti ali uporabe, prav tako pa v Uniji te nove psihoaktivne snovi ne pokriva nobeno dovoljenje za promet z zdravilom.
Apart from its use as an analytical reference standard and in scientific research, there is no indication that it is being used for other purposes.
Nič ne kaže, da bi se uporabljal še v druge namene kot za analitični referenčni standard in pri znanstvenih raziskavah.
The substance 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole has not been, nor is it currently, under assessment by the United Nations system, as defined in Decision 2005/387/JHA.
Snov 5-(2-aminopropil)indol še ni bila in trenutno ni predmet ocene v sistemu Združenih narodov, kot je določeno v Sklepu 2005/387/PNZ.
The Risk Assessment Report reveals that there is limited scientific evidence available on 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole and points out that further research would be needed to determine the health and social risks that it poses.
Poročilo o oceni tveganja razkriva, da je o 5-(2-aminopropil)indolu na voljo malo znanstvenih dokazov, in opozarja na potrebo po nadaljnjih raziskavah, da bi se ugotovilo, kakšna zdravstvena in socialna tveganja predstavlja ta nova psihoaktivna snov.
However, the available evidence and information provides sufficient ground for subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures across the Union.
Vendar razpoložljivi dokazi in informacije zagotavljajo zadostno podlago za uvedbo nadzornih ukrepov za 5-(2-aminopropil)indol v vsej Uniji.
As a result of the health risks that it poses, as documented by its detection in several reported fatalities, of the fact that users may unknowingly consume it, and of the lack of medical value or use, 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole should be subjected to control measures across the Union.
Zaradi zdravstvenih tveganj, ki jih predstavlja 5-(2-aminopropil)indol, kar je dokumentirano ob ugotovitvi njegove prisotnosti pri več zabeleženih smrtnih primerih, zaradi dejstva, da ga lahko uporabniki zaužijejo nevede, in zaradi pomanjkanja njegove medicinske vrednosti ali uporabe, bi bilo treba za 5-(2-aminopropil)indol uvesti nadzorne ukrepe v vsej Uniji.