natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Date of birth: (a) 1970 (b) 1972 (c) 1971 (d) 1973 (e) 1974 (f) 1975.
Datum rojstva: (a) 1970; (b) 1972; (c) 1971; (d) 1973; (e) 1974; (f) 1975.
Date of birth: Approximately 1968.
Datum rojstva: okoli leta 1968.
Place of birth: (a) Zurmat District, Paktia Province, Afghanistan, (b) Garda Saray District, Paktia Province, Afghanistan.
Kraj rojstva: (a) okrožje Zurmat, provinca Paktia, Afganistan; (b) okrožje Garda Saray, provinca Paktia, Afganistan.
Date of birth: Approximately 1975.
Datum rojstva: okoli leta 1975.
Place of birth: (a) Lakhi village, Hazarjuft Area, Garmsir District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan, (b) Laki village, Garmsir District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan, (c) Lakari village, Garmsir District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan, (d) Darvishan, Garmsir District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan, (e) De Luy Wiyalah village, Garmsir District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan.
Kraj rojstva: (a) vas Lakhi, območje Hazarjuft, okrožje Garmsir, provinca Helmand, Afganistan; (b) vas Laki, okrožje Garmsir, provinca Helmand, Afganistan; (c) vas Lakari, okrožje Garmsir, provinca Helmand, Afganistan; (d) Darvishan, okrožje Garmsir, provinca Helmand, Afganistan; (e) vas De Luy Wiyalah, okrožje Garmsir, provinca Helmand, Afganistan.
Date of birth: Approximately 1958.
Datum rojstva: okoli leta 1958.
Date of birth: 1956-1957.
Datum rojstva: 1956 ali 1957.
Date of birth: (a) 1957, (b) 1953.
Datum rojstva: (a) 1957; (b) 1953.
Date of birth: approximately 1977/1978.
Datum rojstva: okoli 1977 ali 1978.
Place of birth: (a) Danda, Miramshah, North Waziristan, Pakistan, (b) Srana village, Garda Saray district, Paktia province, Afghanistan, (c) Neka district, Paktika province, Afghanistan, (d) Khost province, Afghanistan.
Kraj rojstva: Danda, Miramshah, Severni Vaziristan, Pakistan; (b) vas Srana, okrožje Garda Saray, provinca Paktia, Afganistan; (c) okrožje Neka, provinca Paktika, Afganistan; (d) provinca Khost, Afganistan.
Date of birth: Between 1975 and 1976.
Datum rojstva: med letoma 1975 in 1976.
Place of birth: (a) Minar village, Garmser District, Helmand Province, Afghanistan, (b) Darweshan Village, Garmser District, Helmand Province.
Kraj rojstva: (a) vas Minar, okrožje Garmser, provinca Helmand, Afganistan; (b) vas Darweshan, okrožje Garmser, provinca Helmand.
establishing the financial contribution by the Union to the expenditure incurred in the context of the emergency vaccination plans against bluetongue in Belgium in 2007 and 2008
o določitvi finančnega prispevka Unije za odhodke, nastale zaradi sprejetja načrtov cepljenja v izrednih okoliščinah proti bolezni modrikastega jezika v Belgiji leta 2007 in leta 2008
(notified under document C(2013) 2799)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 2799)
Having regard to Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 3(3), (4) and second indent of (6),
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2009/470/ES z dne 25. maja 2009 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1], zlasti členov 3(3) in (4) ter druge alinee člena 3(6) Odločbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union [2] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 84 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: finančna uredba), zlasti člena 84 Uredbe,
In accordance with Article 84 of the Financial Regulation and Article 94 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union [3] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules of Application’), the commitment of expenditure from the Union budget shall be preceded by a financing decision setting out the essential elements of the action involving expenditure and adopted by the institution or the authorities to which powers have been delegated by the institution.
V skladu s členom 84 finančne uredbe in členom 94 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1268/2012 z dne 29. oktobra 2012 o pravilih uporabe Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pravila uporabe), institucija ali organi, na katere je ta institucija prenesla pooblastila, pred odobritvijo odhodka iz proračuna Unije sprejmejo sklep o financiranju, ki določa bistvene elemente ukrepa, povezanega z odhodki.
With a view to helping to eradicate bluetongue as rapidly as possible the Union should contribute financially to eligible expenditure borne by the Member States.
Unija bi morala finančno prispevati k upravičenim odhodkom držav članic, da pomaga pri izkoreninjenju bolezni modrikastega jezika v najkrajšem možnem času.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 lays down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC [4].
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 z dne 28. februarja 2005 določa pravila v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [4].
Article 3 of that Regulation lays down rules on the expenditure eligible for Union financial support.
Člen 3 navedene uredbe določa pravila o odhodkih, upravičenih do finančne podpore Unije.
Commission Decision 2008/655/EC [5] granted a financial contribution by the Union towards emergency measures to combat bluetongue in Belgium in 2007 and 2008.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2008/655/ES [5] je bil odobren finančni prispevek Unije za nujne ukrepe v boju proti bolezni modrikastega jezika v Belgiji za leti 2007 in 2008 .
On 6 April 2009, Belgium submitted an official request for reimbursement as set out in Article 7(1) and 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Belgija je 6. aprila 2009 predložila uradni zahtevek za povračilo iz členov 7(1) in 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
The Belgian authorities have fully complied with their technical and administrative obligations as set out in Article 3(4) of Decision 2009/470/EC and Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Belgijski organi so v celoti izpolnili tehnične in upravne obveznosti iz člena 3(4) Odločbe 2009/470/ES in člena 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
In view of the above considerations, the total amount of the financial support from the Union to the eligible expenditure incurred associated with the eradication of bluetongue in Belgium in 2007 and 2008 should now be fixed according to Article 3(2) of Decision 2008/655/EC.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega bi bilo treba zdaj v skladu s členom 3(2) Odločbe 2008/655/ES določiti celotni znesek finančnega prispevka Unije k upravičenim odhodkom, ki so povezani z izkoreninjenjem bolezni modrikastega jezika v Belgiji v letih 2007 in 2008.
A first tranche of EUR 3328215,15 and a second tranche of EUR 4550004,85 have already been paid.
Prvi obrok v znesku 3328215,15 EUR in drugi obrok v znesku 4550004,85 EUR sta že bila izplačana.
The financial contribution from the Union towards the expenditure associated with eradicating bluetongue in Belgium in 2007 and 2008 is fixed at EUR 7881826,95. It constitutes a financing decision in the meaning of Article 84 of the Financial Regulation.
Finančni prispevek Unije za odhodke v zvezi z izkoreninjenjem bolezni modrikastega jezika v Belgiji za leto 2007 in leto 2008 se določi v višini 7881826,95 EUR. Ta finančni prispevek je sklep o financiranju v smislu člena 84 finančne uredbe.
Having regard to the total Union contribution of EUR 7881826,95, the balance of the financial contribution fixed at EUR 3606,95 remains to be paid.
Ob upoštevanju skupnega prispevka Unije v višini 7881826,95 EUR se preostali znesek finančnega prispevka določi v višini 3606,95 EUR.
The Commission’s observations, method of calculating the eligible expenditure and final conclusions were communicated to Belgium in a letter dated 7 July 2011.
Ugotovitve Komisije, metoda izračuna upravičenih odhodkov in sklepi so bili Belgiji sporočeni v pismu z dne 7. julija 2011.
Belgium agreed to it on 4 August 2011.
Belgija se je z njimi strinjala 4. avgusta 2011.
establishing the financial contribution by the Union to the expenditure incurred in the context of the emergency measures taken to combat avian influenza in Spain in 2009
o določitvi finančnega prispevka Unije za odhodke, nastale zaradi sprejetja nujnih ukrepov za boj proti aviarni influenci v Španiji leta 2009
(notified under document C(2013) 2779)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 2779)
Having regard to Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2009/470/ES z dne 25. maja 2009 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1], zlasti člena 4 Odločbe,
In accordance with Article 84 of the Financial Regulation and Article 94 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union [2] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules of Application’), the commitment of expenditure from the Union budget shall be preceded by a financing decision setting out the essential elements of the action involving expenditure and adopted by the institution or the authorities to which powers have been delegated by the institution.
V skladu s členom 84 finančne uredbe in členom 94 Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1268/2012 z dne 29. oktobra 2012 o pravilih uporabe Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pravila uporabe), institucija ali organi, na katere je ta institucija prenesla pooblastila, pred odobritvijo odhodka iz proračuna Unije sprejmejo sklep o financiranju, ki določa bistvene elemente ukrepa, povezanega z odhodki.
With a view to helping to eradicate avian influenza as rapidly as possible the Union should contribute financially to eligible expenditure borne by the Member States.
Unija bi morala finančno prispevati k upravičenim odhodkom držav članic, da pomaga pri izkoreninjenju aviarne influence v najkrajšem možnem času.
Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC [3] sets rules on the expenditure eligible for Union financial support.
Člen 3 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 z dne 28. februarja 2005 o določitvi pravil v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [3] določa pravila o odhodkih, ki so upravičeni do finančne podpore Unije.
Commission Implementing Decision 2011/798/EU [5] provided that a first tranche of EUR 500000,00 be paid as part of the Union’s financial contribution.
Z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2011/798/EU [5] je bilo določeno, da se prvi obrok v znesku 500000,00 EUR izplača kot del finančnega prispevka Unije.
The request for reimbursement was, as required in Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005, accompanied by a financial report, supporting documents, an epidemiological report on each holding where the animals have been slaughtered or destroyed and the results of respective audits.
Zahtevek za povračilo škode je v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005 vključeval finančno poročilo, dokazilne listine, epidemiološko poročilo o vsakem kmetijskem gospodarstvu, kjer je prišlo do zakola ali uničenja živali, in rezultate zadevnih finančnih revizij.
An audit according to Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 was carried out by the Commission’s services.
Službe Komisije so opravile finančno revizijo v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
Consequently the total amount of the financial support from the Union to the eligible expenditure incurred in connection with the eradication of avian influenza in Spain in 2009 can now be fixed.
Zato je zdaj mogoče določiti skupni znesek finančnega prispevka Unije za upravičene odhodke, nastale zaradi izkoreninjenja aviarne influence v Španiji leta 2009.
The financial contribution from the Union towards the expenditure associated with eradicating avian influenza in Spain in 2009 is fixed at EUR 877910,62.
Finančni prispevek Unije za odhodke v zvezi z izkoreninjenjem aviarne influence v Španiji za leto 2009 se določi v višini 877910,62 EUR.
The balance of the financial contribution is fixed at EUR 377910,62.
Preostali znesek finančnega prispevka se določi v višini 377910,62 EUR.
This Decision constituting a financing decision in the meaning of Article 84 of the Financial Regulation is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Ta sklep je sklep o financiranju v smislu člena 84 finančne uredbe in je naslovljen na Kraljevino Španijo.
OJ L 320, 3.12.2011, p. 45.
UL L 320, 3.12.2011, str. 45.
Commission Decision 2010/148/EU of 5 March 2010 on a financial contribution from the Union towards emergency measures to combat avian influenza in the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, France and Italy in 2009 [4] granted a financial contribution by the Union towards emergency measures to combat avian influenza, among others, in Spain in 2009.
S Sklepom Komisije 2010/148/EU z dne 5. marca 2010 o finančnem prispevku Unije za nujne ukrepe za boj proti aviarni influenci na Češkem, v Nemčiji, Španiji, Franciji in Italiji leta 2009 [4] je bil odobren finančni prispevek Unije za nujne ukrepe za boj proti aviarni influenci, med drugim v Španiji leta 2009.
An official request for reimbursement was submitted by Spain on 26 March 2010 and 3 May 2010, as set out in Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Španija je 26. marca 2010 in 3. maja 2010 vložila uradni zahtevek za povračilo iz člena 7(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
The Commission’s observations, method of calculating the eligible expenditure and final conclusions were communicated to Spain on 12 September 2012.
Ugotovitve Komisije, metoda izračuna upravičenih odhodkov in sklepi so bili Španiji sporočeni 12. septembra 2012.
Spain agreed by e-mail dated 9 October 2012.
Španija je svoje soglašanje sporočila po elektronski pošti 9. oktobra 2012.
amending Decision 2000/745/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand
o spremembi Sklepa 2000/745/ES o sprejetju zavez, ponujenih v zvezi s protidampinškim in protisubvencijskim postopkom pri uvozu nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Malezije, Republike Koreje, Tajvana in Tajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic anti-dumping Regulation’), and in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna protidampinška uredba), in zlasti členov 8 in 9 Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 [2], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephtalate (‘PET’) originating in India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Thailand and Taiwan following an expiry review and a partial interim review.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 192/2007 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije, Malezije, Republike Koreje, Tajske in Tajvana na podlagi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov in delnega vmesnega pregleda.
The Commission, by Decision 2000/745/EC [5] (‘the Decision’), accepted a price undertaking (‘the undertaking’), inter alia, from the Indonesian company P.T.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2000/745/ES [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sklep) sprejela cenovno zavezo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zaveza), med drugim, indonezijskega podjetja P.T.
Polypet Karyapersada (‘Polypet’).
Polypet Karyapersada (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Polypet).
Following the findings and conclusions relating to a ‘new exporter’ review [6], the Commission, by Decision 2002/232/EC [7] amending Decision 2000/745/EC, accepted an undertaking from the Indian company Futura Polyesters Limited (‘Futura’).
Po ugotovitvah in sklepih v zvezi s pregledom glede „novega izvoznika“ [6] je Komisija s Sklepom 2002/232/ES [7] o spremembi Sklepa 2000/745/ES sprejela zavezo indijskega podjetja Futura Polyesters Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Futura).
B. OBLIGATIONS ARISING FROM THE UNDERTAKING
B. OBVEZNOSTI, KI IZHAJAJO IZ ZAVEZE
One of the fundamental obligations arising from an undertaking is the quarterly reporting of sales, which enables the Commission to effectively monitor the undertaking.
Ena od temeljnih obveznosti, ki izhaja iz zaveze, je četrtletno poročanje o prodaji, ki Komisiji omogoča učinkovito spremljanje zaveze.
The monitoring obligation also covers the situation that no sales were carried out during a given quarter (a so-called ‘no sales’ report).
Spremljanje obveznosti se uporablja tudi, če v posameznem četrtletju ni bila izvedena nobena prodaja (t. i. poročilo o „ničelni prodaji“).
In addition, the exporting producers must immediately notify the Commission of any changes of the corporate structure of the company which might occur during the application of the undertaking.
Poleg tega morajo proizvajalci izvozniki takoj obvestiti Komisijo o vseh spremembah v strukturi podjetja, do katerih bi lahko prišlo v času veljavnosti zaveze.
The provisions of the undertaking stipulate that failure to cooperate with the Commission on these issues shall be considered as a breach of the undertaking.
Določbe zaveze določajo, da se nesodelovanje s Komisijo glede teh vprašanj šteje za kršitev zaveze.
A recent ruling of the Court of Justice [8] also confirmed that reporting obligations must be regarded as primary obligations for the proper functioning of an undertaking.
Nedavna sodba Sodišča [8] je potrdila tudi, da je treba za pravilno delovanje zaveze obveznosti poročanja obravnavati kot osnovne obveznosti.
C. BREACHES OF THE UNDERTAKING
C. KRŠITVE ZAVEZE
The company Polypet did not send any sales report regarding the third quarter 2012, despite repetitive reminders.
Podjetje Polypet kljub večkratnim opozorilom ni poslalo poročila o prodaji za tretje četrtletje leta 2012.
The company Futura did not send any reports for the third and fourth quarter 2012, despite repetitive reminders.
Podjetje Futura kljub večkratnim opozorilom ni poslalo poročil za tretje in četrto četrtletje leta 2012.
These failures to submit reports and notifications on the change of company structure qualify as continuous non-cooperation, thus breaching the provisions of the undertakings.
Dejstvo, da poročila in obvestila o spremembi strukture podjetja niso bila predložena, se šteje kot ponavljajoče se nesodelovanje, s čimer so kršene določbe zavez.
This justifies withdrawing both undertakings.
To upravičuje umik obeh zavez.
D. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
D. PISNA STALIŠČA
Both companies were granted the opportunity to be heard and make written submissions.
Obema podjetjema je bila dana možnost ustne in pisne predstavitve stališč.
No written submissions were received from the companies.
Podjetji pisnih stališč nista predložili.
E. AMENDMENT OF DECISION 2000/745/EC
E. SPREMEMBA SKLEPA 2000/745/ES
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and also in accordance with the relevant clauses of the undertakings authorising the Commission to withdraw the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertakings offered by the companies Polypet and Futura should be withdrawn and Decision 2000/745/EC as amended by Decision 2002/232/EC should be amended.
Zato je v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in v skladu z zadevnimi klavzulami zavez, ki pooblaščajo Komisijo, da umakne sprejetje zaveze, Komisija sklenila, da bi bilo treba umakniti sprejetje zavez, ki sta ju predložili podjetji Polypet in Futura, ter spremeniti Sklep 2000/745/ES, kot je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2002/232/ES.
Accordingly, the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 should automatically apply to imports of PET manufactured by the companies Polypet and Futura (TARIC additional code A193 for Polypet and TARIC additional code A184 for Futura),
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba dokončne protidampinške dajatve, naložene s členom 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 192/2007, samodejno uporabljati za uvoz PET, ki ga proizvajata podjetji Polypet in Futura (dodatna oznaka TARIC A193 za podjetje Polypet in dodatna oznaka TARIC A184 za podjetje Futura) –
The acceptance of the undertakings in relation to the companies P.T. Polypet Karyapersada, Indonesia (TARIC additional code A193) and Futura Polyesters Limited, India (TARIC additional code A184) is hereby withdrawn.
Sprejetje zavez v zvezi s podjetji P.T.Polypet Karyapersada, Indonezija (dodatna oznaka TARIC A193) in Futura Polyesters Limited, Indija (dodatna oznaka TARIC A184) se umakne.
The table of Article 1 in Decision 2000/745/EC is replaced by the following table:
Razpredelnica iz člena 1 Sklepa 2000/745/ES se nadomesti z naslednjo razpredelnico:
OJ L 199, 5.8.2000, p. 48.
UL L 199, 5.8.2000, str. 48.
OJ L 78, 21.3.2002, p. 4.
UL L 78, 21.3.2002, str. 4.
OJ L 78, 21.3.2002, p. 12 and OJ C 116, 15.5.2003, p. 2.
UL L 78, 21.3.2002, str. 12; UL C 116, 15.5.2003, str. 2.
Case C-552/10 P, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=130244&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=825501
Zadeva C-552/10 P, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=130244&pageIndex=0&doclang=SL&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=825501.
In addition, contrary to the provisions of the undertaking to which the company committed, Polypet did not inform the Commission immediately that its assets had been sold to another Indonesian company in August 2012.
Poleg tega podjetje v nasprotju z določbami zaveze, ki jo je prevzelo, Komisije ni takoj obvestilo, da je bilo njegovo premoženje avgusta 2012 prodano drugemu indonezijskemu podjetju.
No report was received regarding the fourth quarter 2012.
Poročilo za četrto četrtletje leta 2012 ni bilo predloženo.
The measures were originally imposed in August 2000 [3].
Ukrepi so bili prvotno uvedeni avgusta 2000 [3].
Measures are currently subject to another expiry review [4].
Ti ukrepi so trenutno ponovno predmet pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov [4].
of 17 May 2013
z dne 17. maja 2013
authorising a laboratory in Croatia to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines
o odobritvi laboratorija na Hrvaškem za izvajanje seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini
(notified under document C(2013) 2783)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 2783)
Having regard to Council Decision 2000/258/EC of 20 March 2000 designating a specific institute responsible for establishing the criteria necessary for standardising the serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines [1], and in particular Article 3(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2000/258/ES z dne 20. marca 2000 o imenovanju posebnega inštituta, pristojnega za uvajanje meril, ki so potrebna za standardizacijo seroloških testov za nadzorovanje učinkovitosti cepiva proti steklini [1], zlasti člena 3(2) Odločbe,