natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
where necessary, specific measures to address any particularity or complication that could reasonably be expected to prevent, hinder or delay eradication, in particular those related to the accessibility and adequate eradication of all plants that are infested or suspected of infestation, irrespective of their location, public or private ownership or the person or entity responsible for them;
po potrebi sprejetje posebnih ukrepov za obravnavanje kakršnih koli posebnosti ali zapletov, ki bi dejansko lahko preprečili, ovirali ali odložili izkoreninjenje, zlasti tistih v zvezi z dostopnostjo in ustreznim izkoreninjenjem vseh rastlin, ki so napadene ali za katere obstaja sum na napad, ne glede na kraj, javno ali zasebno lastništvo oziroma osebo ali subjekt, ki je zanje odgovoren;
any other measure, which may contribute to the eradication of the specified organism, taking account of ISPM No 9 [3] and applying an integrated approach according to the principles set out in ISPM No 14 [4].
sprejetje kakršnega koli drugega ukrepa, ki bi lahko prispeval k izkoreninjenju navedenega organizma, ob upoštevanju ISPM št. 9 [3] in uporabi celostnega pristopa v skladu z načeli iz ISPM št. 14 [4].
The measures referred to in points (a) to (k) shall be presented in the form of a report referred to in Article 7.
Ukrepi iz točk (a) do (k) se predložijo v obliki poročila iz člena 7.
When the results of the surveys referred to in Article 5 during more than 4 consecutive years have confirmed the presence of the specified organism in an area and in case there is evidence that the specified organism can no longer be eradicated, Member States can limit the measures to the containment of the specified organism within that area.
Ko rezultati sistematičnih raziskav iz člena 5 v več kot štirih zaporednih letih potrdijo navzočnost navedenega organizma na območju in če obstajajo dokazi, da navedenega organizma ni več mogoče izkoreniniti, lahko države članice omejijo ukrepe na zadrževanje navedenega organizma na navedenem območju.
Such measures shall include at least the following:
Ti ukrepi vključujejo najmanj naslednje:
felling of infested plants and plants with symptoms caused by the specified organism, and the complete removal of their roots; felling activities shall start immediately, however in cases where the infested plants were found outside the flying period of the specified organism the felling and removal shall be carried out before the start of the next flying period; in exceptional cases where a responsible official body concludes that such felling is inappropriate an alternative eradication measure may be applied offering the same level of protection against the spread of the specified organism; the reasons for that conclusion and the description of the measure shall be notified to the Commission in the report referred to in Article 7;
sekanje napadenih rastlin in rastlin z znaki, ki jih je povzročil navedeni organizem, in odstranitev njihovih korenin v celoti; sekanje se začne takoj, kadar pa se napadene rastline odkrijejo izven obdobja letenja navedenega organizma, se sekanje in odstranitev izvajata pred začetkom naslednjega obdobja letenja; ko v izjemnih primerih uradni odgovorni organ ugotovi, da je tako sekanje neprimerno, se lahko uporabi nadomestni ukrep za izkoreninjenje, ki zagotavlja enako raven varstva pred širjenjem navedenega organizma; razlogi za tako odločitev in opis ukrepa se sporočijo Komisiji v poročilu iz člena 7;
removal, examination and disposal of plants felled and of their roots; taking of necessary precautions to avoid spreading of the specified organism after felling;
odstranitev, pregled in uničenje posekanih rastlin ter njihovih korenin; sprejetje vseh potrebnih preventivnih ukrepov, da bi se izognili širjenju navedenega organizma po sekanju;
prohibition of planting of new specified plants in the open air in an infested area referred to in point 1(a) of Section 1 of Annex II except for places of production referred to in Section 2 of Annex I;
prepoved sajenja novih navedenih rastlin na prostem in na napadenem območju iz točke 1(a) oddelka 1 Priloge II, razen na mestih pridelave iz oddelka 2 Priloge I;
intensive monitoring for the presence of the specified organism by annual inspections at appropriate times on host plants, including where appropriate targeted destructive sampling; the number of samples shall be indicated in the report referred to in Article 7;
poostreno spremljanje navzočnosti navedenega organizma z letnimi pregledi ob ustreznem času na gostiteljskih rastlinah, vključno s ciljanim destruktivnim vzorčenjem, kadar je ustrezno; število vzorcev se navede v poročilu iz člena 7;
activities to raise public awareness concerning the threat of the specified organism and the measures adopted to prevent its introduction into and spread within the Union including the conditions regarding movement of specified plants from the demarcated area established under Article 6;
izvajanje dejavnosti za ozaveščanje javnosti o nevarnosti, ki jo predstavlja navedeni organizem, in ukrepih, sprejetih za preprečevanje njegovega vnosa v Unijo in širjenja v Uniji, vključno s pogoji o premeščanju navedenih rastlin z razmejenih območij, vzpostavljenih v skladu s členom 6;
where necessary, specific measures to address any particularity or complication that could reasonably be expected to prevent, hinder or delay containment, in particular those related to the accessibility and adequate eradication of all plants that are infested or suspected of infestation, irrespective of their location, public or private ownership or the person or entity responsible for them;
po potrebi sprejetje posebnih ukrepov za obravnavanje kakršnih koli posebnosti ali zapletov, ki bi dejansko lahko preprečili, ovirali ali odložili zadrževanje, zlasti tistih v zvezi z dostopnostjo in ustreznim izkoreninjenjem vseh rastlin, ki so napadene ali za katere obstaja sum na napad, ne glede na kraj, javno ali zasebno lastništvo oziroma osebo ali subjekt, ki je zanje odgovoren;
any other measure, which may contribute to the containment of the specified organism.
sprejetje katerih koli drugih ukrepov, ki lahko prispevajo k zadrževanju navedenega organizma.
The measures referred to in points (a) to (i) shall be presented in the form of a report referred to in Article 7.
Ukrepi iz točk (a) do (i) se predstavijo v obliki poročila iz člena 7.
The use of integrated measures in a systems approach for pest risk management — Reference Standard ISPM No 14 by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, Rome.
Uporaba celostnih ukrepov v sistemskem pristopu k obvladovanju tveganja pri škodljivcih – Referenčni standard ISPM št. 14 Sekretariata Mednarodne konvencije o varstvu rastlin, Rim.
establishing whether effective action has been taken by Hungary in response to the Council recommendation of 7 July 2009
o ugotovitvi, ali so na Madžarskem bili sprejeti učinkoviti ukrepi na podlagi priporočila Sveta z dne 7. julija 2009
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 126(8) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 126(8) Pogodbe,
According to Article 126(1) of the Treaty, Member States are to avoid excessive government deficits.
V členu 126(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je določeno, da se države članice izogibajo čezmernemu javnofinančnemu primanjkljaju.
The Stability and Growth Pact includes Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure [1], which was adopted in order to further the prompt correction of excessive general government deficits.
Pakt za stabilnost in rast vključuje vsebino Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [1], sprejete z namenom nadaljnje spodbuditve hitrega zmanjšanja čezmernih javnofinančnih primanjkljajev.
By Decision 2004/918/EC [2] taken on 5 July 2004 the Council, upon a recommendation from the Commission, decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), that an excessive deficit existed in Hungary [3].
V skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (PES) je Svet 5. julija 2004 na podlagi priporočila Komisije s Sklepom 2004/918/ES [2] ugotovil, da na Madžarskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj [3].
On 8 March 2005, upon a recommendation from the Commission, the Council adopted a second recommendation in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC, confirming the 2008 deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit.
Dne 8. marca 2005 je Svet na podlagi priporočila Komisije sprejel še eno priporočilo na podlagi člena 104(7) PES, v katerem je leto 2008 potrdil kot rok za odpravo čezmernega primanjkljaja.
After a substantial deterioration of the budgetary outlook in Hungary, by Decision 2005/843/EC [5] taken on 8 November 2005 the Council, in accordance with Article 104(8) TEC, established that Hungary had for the second time failed to take effective action in response to the Council recommendations.
Po znatnem poslabšanju pričakovanega proračunskega stanja na Madžarskem je Svet s Sklepom 2005/843/ES [5] z dne 8. novembra 2005 ugotovil, da Madžarska tudi drugič ni sprejela učinkovitih ukrepov na podlagi priporočila Sveta v skladu s členom 104(8) PES.
On 15 December 2011 Hungary submitted its Report on the measures taken in response to Council Recommendation of 7 July, 2009 under Article 126(7) of the Treaty, December 2011 (‘December 2011 EDP progress report’) to the Commission and the Council.
Madžarska je 15. decembra 2011 predložila „Poročilo o ukrepih v odziv na priporočilo Sveta z dne 7. julija 2009 na podlagi člena 126(7) PDEU, december 2011“, (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EDP poročilo o napredku iz decembra 2011), ki je bilo predloženo Komisiji in Svetu.
On the basis of, inter alia, that progress report, an updated assessment of the action taken by Hungary to correct the excessive deficit by 2011 in response to the Council recommendation of 7 July 2009 leads to the following conclusions:
Na podlagi, med drugim, navedenega poročila je bila posodobljena ocena ukrepov za odpravo čezmernega primanjkljaja do leta 2011 na podlagi priporočila Sveta z dne 7. julija 2009, iz katere izhajajo naslednje ugotovitve:
Without one-off measures the deficit would have reached around 6 % of GDP and by far surpassed the 3 % of GDP reference value set in Article 1 of Protocol (No 12) on the excessive deficit procedure attached to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty.
Brez enkratnih ukrepov bi primanjkljaj dosegel okoli 6 % BDP in znatno presegel referenčno vrednost v višini 3 % BDP, določeno v členu 1 Protokola (št. 12) o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primankljajem, priloženem Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi.
In their 2011 autumn EDP notification, the Hungarian authorities projected a surplus of 3,9 % of GDP.
Madžarski organi so v obvestilu o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem z jeseni 2011 napovedali presežek v višini 3,9 % BDP.
The 2011 autumn forecast projected a somewhat lower surplus (notably 3,6 % of GDP), since it included the assumption of part of the debt of public transport companies (0,2 % of GDP).
V napovedi za jesen 2011 je bil napovedan nekoliko nižji presežek (3,6 % BDP), zlasti ker je upoštevala delni prevzem dolga podjetij javnega prevoza (0,2 % BDP).
Based on recent information on one-offs received after the cut-off date of the 2011 autumn forecast, the surplus may even be lower.
Ob upoštevanju nedavnih informacij o enkratnih prejemkih, prejetih po roku, določenem v napovedi za jesen 2011, bi bil presežek lahko še nižji.
In contrast, the 2011 autumn forecast projects the 2012 general government deficit to reach 2,8 % of GDP and the structural deficit to improve by 2,4 % of GDP.
Nasprotno naj bi po napovedi za jesen 2011 javnofinančni primanjkljaj dosegel 2,8 % BDP in stukturni primanjkljaj izboljšal za do 2,4 % BDP.
Compared to the draft budget, these higher deficit numbers reflect, among other factors, a lower economic growth projection for 2012 by 1 percentage point as well as a more prudent assessment of revenue and expenditure developments.
Višji primanjkljaj v primerjavi z osnutkom proračuna je med drugim posledica tega, da se za leto 2012 pričakuje za 1 odstotno točko nižja gospodarska rast, pa tudi bolj preudarne ocene razvoja na področju prihodkov in odhodkov.
At the same time, the draft budget assumes in line with the relevant legislation that the extraordinary reserve is not expected to be spent.
Obenem je v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo v osnutku proračuna predvideno, da se rezerva za izredne razmere ne bo porabila.
Nevertheless, the 3 % GDP deficit threshold is only respected on the back of a close to 0,9 % of GDP one-off revenue stemming from the abovementioned extraordinary sectoral levies;
Vendar je mejna vrednost primanjkljaja 3 % BDP spoštovana le zaradi enkratnih prihodkov v višini skoraj 0,9 % BDP, ki izhajajo iz že navedenih izrednih sektorskih dajatev.
according to the 2011 autumn forecast, and based on the usual no-policy-change assumption, the budget deficit was projected to deteriorate again to 3,7 % in 2013.
v skladu z napovedjo za jesen 2011 in na podlagi običajne domneve, da v politiki ne bo prišlo do sprememb, je bilo predvideno, da se bo proračunski primanjkljaj v letu 2013 spet povečal na 3,7 %.
This is chiefly due to the fact that the phasing out of the extraordinary levies of around 0,9 % of GDP is not expected to be counterbalanced by the additional savings from the structural reform programme for that year;
Razlog za to je predvsem dejstvo, da dodatni prihranki iz programa strukturnih reform za navedeno leto ne bodo kompenzirali postopne ukinitve izrednih dajatev v višini okoli 0,9 % BDP;
based on budgetary developments since the publication of the 2011 autumn forecast, the 2012 projection of general government deficit of 2,8 % of GDP still appears to be plausible (without taking into account the recent deterioration in the macroeconomic environment).
splošni javni primanjkljaj v višini 2,8 % BDP, predviden za leto 2012 na podlagi proračunskega razvoja od objave napovedi z jeseni 2011, se še vedno zdi verjeten (brez upoštevanja nedavnega poslabšanja makroekonomskega okolja).
This is explained by the fact that the deficit-decreasing impact of the new consolidation package of 0,4 % of GDP adopted by the government on 15 December 2011 is broadly counterbalanced by the deficit-increasing amendments adopted to the draft budget as well as by the net budgetary costs of the agreement with the banking sector concluded on 15 December 2011 which are not yet appropriately offset by additional consolidation measures;
To pojasnjuje dejstvo, da so posledice novega konsolidacijskega svežnja, ki zmanjšujejo primanjkljaj, v višini 0,4 % BDP, ki ga je vlada sprejela dne 15. decembra 2011, večinoma izenačene s spremembami osnutka proračuna, ki povečujejo primanjkljaj, in neto proračunskimi stroški sporazuma z bančnim sektorjem, sklenjenega dne 15. decembra 2011, ki še niso ustrezno kompenzirani z dodatnimi konsolidacijskimi ukrepi;
for 2013, taking into account some further specifications of the structural reform programme (related government and Parliamentary decisions are detailed in Hungary’s December 2011 EDP progress report), the positive base effect from 2012 and the net cost stemming from the agreement with the banking sector, the 2013 deficit projection contained in the 2011 autumn forecast could be lowered from 3,7 % of GDP to 3,25 % of GDP, which is, nevertheless, still clearly above the 3 % GDP deficit threshold.
ob upoštevanju nekaterih nadaljnjih specifikacij programa strukturnih reform (povezane odločitve vlade in parlamenta so podrobno opisane v poročilu o napredku iz decembra 2011), pozitivnega osnovnega učinka iz leta 2012 in neto stroškov, ki izhajajo iz sporazuma z bančnim sektorjem, je primanjkljaj, predviden za leto 2013 v napovedi za jesen 2011, mogoče zmanjšati s 3,7 % BDP na 3,25 % BDP, kar pa je še vedno jasno nad mejno vrednostjo 3 % BDP.
The difference between the present updated assessment and the official target (2,2 % of GDP) laid down in the April 2011 Convergence Programme of Hungary notably stems from the fact that, in the absence of specific steps, about half of the structural reform programme could not be taken into account.
Razlika med posodobljeno oceno in uradnim ciljnim primanjkljajem (2,2 % BDP) iz madžarskega programa za konvergenčnost iz aprila 2011 je predvsem posledica dejstva, da se zaradi pomanjkanja posebnih ukrepov približno polovica programa strukturnih reform ni mogla upoštevati.
The remainder of the difference compared to the official target is related to a higher expenditure forecast, notably in the area of state-owned transport enterprises and the maintenance of roads and also incorporates some difference in growth assumptions.
Preostanek razlike v primerjavi z uradnim ciljnim primanjkljajem je povezan z napovedanimi višjimi odhodki, predvsem na področju prevoznih podjetij v državni lasti in vzdrževanja cest ter vključuje tudi nekolikšno razliko v predpostavkah o rasti.
Further structural reforms are planned, that could reduce the deficit forecast, but are not yet sufficiently specified;
Predvidene so nadaljnje strukturne reforme, zaradi katerih bi lahko bil v napovedi predviden primanjkljaj nižji, vendar te reforme še niso dovolj natančno določene;
the risks to these updated medium-term projections are tilted to the downside.
pri posodobljenih srednjeročnih napovedih prevladujejo negativna tveganja.
There is some positive risk, notably stemming from the continuation of better-than-expected revenue inflows into 2012 and 2013.
Obstaja nekaj pozitivnega tveganja, predvsem zaradi nadaljnjega priliva prihodkov, ki je boljši od pričakovanega, za leti 2012 in 2013.
However, negative risks are expected to be higher than the offsetting positive risks.
Vendar bodo negativna tveganja predvidoma več kot izravnala pozitivno tveganje.
according to the 2011 autumn forecast, gross public debt, given both the forecast deficit numbers and the exchange rate assumptions, is expected to increase again to nearly 77 % of GDP by 2013, following a temporary drop in 2011 due to the takeover of the private pension assets.
po napovedi za jesen 2011 naj bi se bruto javni dolg do leta 2013 glede na napovedani primanjkljaj in predpostavljeni menjalni tečaj znova povečal na skoraj 77 % BDP, potem ko se je v letu 2011 začasno zmanjšal zaradi prevzema zasebnih pokojninskih sredstev.
If the medium-term budgetary projections were updated only on the basis of new measures adopted after the cut-off date of the forecast, the projected 2012 debt ratio would be largely unchanged and improve only slightly in 2013.
Če bi se srednjeročne proračunske napovedi posodobile le na podlagi novih ukrepov, sprejetih po roku iz napovedi, bi delež dolga napovedan za leto 2012 ostal večinoma nespremenjen in bi se v letu 2013 le rahlo izboljšal.
However, further possible revisions in the budgetary projections, taking into account most notably the increased yields, the end-2011 HUF/EUR exchange rate of 311 (which is around 12 % weaker than the technical assumption used in the 2011 autumn forecast), as well as the weaker macroeconomic environment, would lead to a debt ratio of around 80 % in 2011, after which it would stabilise at around 78,5 % in both 2012 and 2013, whereas the Council recommended that the gross debt ratio should be brought onto a firm downward trajectory.
Zaradi nadaljnjih možnih revizij proračunskih napovedi, ob upoštevanju predvsem povečanih donosov, konca menjalnega tečaja med HUF in EUR v višini 311 (kar je približno 12 % slabše od tehnične predpostavke, uporabljene v napovedi za jesen 2011) in slabšega makroekonomskega okolja, pa bi v letu 2011 delež dolga znašal približno 80 %, nato pa bi se tako v letu 2012 kot tudi 2013 ustalil na ravni okoli 78,5 %, medtem ko je Svet priporočil, da se mora delež javnega dolga stalno zmanjševati.
The overall conclusion is while Hungary formally respects the 3 % of GDP reference value by 2011 this is not based on a structural and sustainable correction.
Na splošno lahko ugotovimo, da Madžarska do leta 2011 formalno spoštuje referenčno vrednost 3 % BDP, vendar to ne temelji na strukturnem in trajnostnem popravku.
The budget surplus in 2011 hinges upon substantial one-off revenues of over 10 % of GDP and is accompanied by a cumulative structural deterioration in 2010 and 2011 of 2,75 % of GDP compared to a recommended cumulative fiscal improvement of 0,5 % of GDP.
Proračunski presežek je v letu 2011 odvisen od znatnih enkratnih prihodkov v višini več kot 10 % BDP, v letih 2010 in 2011 pa ga spremlja skupno strukturno poslabšanje v višini 2,75 % BDP v primerjavi s priporočenim skupnim fiskalnim izboljšanjem v višini 0,5 % BDP.
Moreover, the authorities are implementing substantial structural measures in 2012 reducing the structural deficit to 2,6 % of GDP; the 3 % of GDP reference value is again only respected thanks to one-off measures of close to 1 % of GDP.
Medtem ko bodo organi v letu 2012 izvajali znatne strukturne ukrepe za znižanje strukturnega primanjkljaja na 2,6 % BDP, se bo referenčna vrednost 3 % BDP znova spoštovala le zaradi enkratnih ukrepov v vrednosti skoraj 1 % BDP.
Overall, this supports the conclusion that the response by the Hungarian authorities to the Council recommendation of 7 July 2009 adopted in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC has been insufficient,
Na splošno to utemeljuje ugotovitev, da je bil odziv madžarskih organov na priporočilo Sveta z dne 7. julija 2009, sprejeto v skladu s členom 104(7) PES, pomanjkljiv –
Hungary has not taken effective action in response to the Council recommendation of 7 July 2009 in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC within the period laid down in that recommendation.
Na Madžarskem niso bili v roku iz priporočila Sveta z dne 7. julija 2009 v skladu s členom 104(7) PES sprejeti učinkoviti ukrepi na podlagi navedenega priporočila.
All EDP-related documents for Hungary can be found at the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/deficit/index_en.htm
Vsi dokumenti za Madžarsko, povezani s postopkom v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, so na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/deficit/index_en.htm.
OJ L 110, 30.4.2005, p. 42.
UL L 110, 30.4.2005, str. 42.
OJ L 314, 30.11.2005, p. 18.
UL L 314, 30.11.2005, str. 18.
COM/2010/0010 final.
COM/2010/0010 konč.
On 5 July 2004 the Council, upon a recommendation from the Commission, recommended in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC that the Hungarian authorities take action in a medium-term framework in order to bring the deficit below 3 % of GDP by 2008.
Svet je 5. julija 2004 prav tako na podlagi priporočila Komisije sprejel priporočilo na podlagi člena 104(7) PES, v katerem je madžarske organe pozval, naj sprejmejo srednjeročne ukrepe z namenom zmanjšanja primanjkljaja pod 3 % BDP do leta 2008.
By Decision 2005/348/EC [4] taken on 18 January 2005 the Council, in accordance with Article 104(8) TEC, established that Hungary had not taken effective action in response to the Council recommendation.
Svet je dne 18. januarja 2005 s Sklepom 2005/348/ES [4] ugotovil, da na Madžarskem niso bili sprejeti učinkoviti ukrepi na podlagi priporočila v skladu s členom 104(8) PES.
Accordingly, on 10 October 2006, upon a recommendation from the Commission, the Council adopted a third recommendation in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC to Hungary, postponing the deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit until 2009.
Svet je zato dne 10. oktobra 2006 na priporočilo Komisije sprejel tretje priporočilo v skladu s členom 104(7) PES, v katerem je rok za odpravo čezmernega primanjkljaja prestavil na leto 2009.
On 7 July 2009, the Council in its recommendation adopted in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC concluded that the Hungarian authorities could be considered to have taken effective action in response to the recommendations from October 2006.
Dne 7. julija 2009 je Svet sprejel priporočilo na podlagi člena 104(7) PES in sklenil, da so madžarski organi sprejeli učinkovite ukrepe na podlagi priporočila iz oktobra 2006.