natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See Commission Decision of 17.5.2000 in state aid case N 773/99 Spain – regional map for 2000-2006, text available at http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/state_aids/comp-1999/n773-99.pdf.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 17.5.2000 o državni pomoči št. 773/99 Španije – karta regionalnih pomoči za obdobje 2000–2006, besedilo je na voljo na spletnem naslovu http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/state_aids/comp-1999/n773-99.pdf.
See footnote 33.
Glej opombo št. 34.
No other third parties commented on the opening Decision.
Nobene druge tretje strani niso predložile pripomb k sklepu o začetku postopka.
Habidite submitted additional comments and information on: 27 July 2010 – to which the Spanish authorities replied on 3 November 2011; 6 April 2011 (registered on 13 April 2011) – to which the Spanish authorities replied on 30 May 2011 (registered on 6 June 2011); and 7 July 2011.
Podjetje Habidite je predložilo dodatne pripombe in informacije z dopisom z dne 27. julija 2010, na katerega so španski organi odgovorili 3. novembra 2011; dopisom z dne 6. aprila 2011 (evidentiran 13. aprila 2011), na katerega so španski organi odgovorili 30. maja 2011 (evidentiran 6. junija 2011); in dopisom z dne 7. julija 2011.
The Commission services met on 3 February 2011 in Brussels with representatives of Habidite, at the latter’s request.
Službe Komisije so se na zahtevo podjetja Habidite sestale z njegovimi predstavniki 3. februarja 2011 v Bruslju.
As indicated in recitals (3) and (6), Habidite commented on the opening Decision on 9 April 2010, and provided additional information and comments on 27 July 2010, 6 April 2011 and 7 July 2011.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (3) in (6), je podjetje Habidite 9. aprila 2010 predložilo pripombe k sklepu o začetku postopka ter 27. julija 2010, 6. aprila 2011 in 7. julija 2011 predložilo dodatne informacije in pripombe.
With these submissions, Habidite on the one hand informed of relevant factual elements which were not known to the Commission at the time of the opening Decision, and on the other hand, brought forward arguments to contest the existence of aid in the notified contracts.
V teh pripombah in informacijah je podjetje Habidite navedlo ustrezna dejstva, ki Komisiji niso bila znana v času sprejetja sklepa o začetku postopka, ter predstavilo argumente, s katerimi je izpodbijalo obstoj pomoči v priglašenih pogodbah.
Therefore the project has already started to be implemented in May 2007.
Projekt se je torej začel izvajati že maja 2007.
Pursuant to Point 38 of the Community Guidelines on National Regional Aid 2007-2013 [33], in order to ensure that regional aid produces an incentive effect on the investment, aid may only be granted under aid schemes if the beneficiary has submitted an application for aid and the competent authorities have subsequently confirmed in writing, before the start of the work on the project, that it meets in principle the conditions of eligibility laid down in the scheme.
V skladu s točko 38 Smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 [33] je treba zagotoviti, da ima regionalna pomoč spodbujevalni učinek na naložbo, zato je lahko pomoč dodeljena v okviru shem pomoči samo, če je upravičenec predložil vlogo za pomoč in so nato pristojni organi pred začetkom izvajanja projekta pisno potrdili, da projekt načeloma izpolnjuje pogoje upravičenosti, določene v shemi.
The Land and Houses Contracts were signed on 15 December 2006, but they were notified to the Commission for review only in April 2009.
Pogodba o zemljišču in pogodba o stanovanjih sta bili podpisani 15. decembra 2006, vendar sta bili predloženi Komisiji v pregled šele aprila 2009.
As already indicated in recital (56) above, according to an established practice [34], state aid is considered to be granted at the moment when there is a legally-binding, non-conditional commitment for its disbursement.
Kot je navedeno že v uvodni izjavi (56), se v skladu z uveljavljeno prakso šteje [34], da je državna pomoč dodeljena v trenutku, ko obstaja pravno zavezujoča brezpogojna zaveza za njeno izplačilo.
As indicated in the Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid [36], the rules applicable to unlawful aid are those that were in force at the moment when the aid was granted – in the present case, on 15 December 2006.
Kot je navedeno v obvestilu Komisije o določitvi pravil, ki se uporabljajo za oceno nezakonite državne pomoči [36], za nezakonito pomoč veljajo pravila, ki so veljala v času, ko je bila pomoč dodeljena – v tem primeru 15. decembra 2006.
These principles are also confirmed by Points 63 and 105 of the Community Guidelines on National Regional Aid 2007-2013 [37].
Ta načela potrjujeta tudi točki 63 in 105 Smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 [37].
The Commission shall therefore rely on the state aid rules in force on 15 December 2006, when the two notified contracts were signed, for assessing both existence of aid and compatibility.
Komisija se bo zato pri ocenjevanju obstoja pomoči in združljivosti opirala na pravila o državni pomoči, ki so veljala 15. decembra 2006, ko sta bili priglašeni pogodbi podpisani.
It estimated its overall resulting market share on the Spanish market (free market plus social housing projects) to increase from 0,4 % in 2011 to 1 % for the period 2012-2016.
Ocenilo je, da bi se njegov celotni tržni delež na španskem trgu (prosti trg in projekti socialnih stanovanj) posledično povečal z 0,4 % v letu 2011 na 1 % v obdobju 2012–2016.
For the year 2011, for example, Habidite estimated that the total number of houses to be sold on the entire Spanish market would have been of approximately 320000 houses, of which, with a production of 1403 houses in 2011, it would have covered a market share of 0,4 %.
Podjetje Habidite je na primer za leto 2011 ocenilo, da naj bi se na celotnem španskem trgu prodalo skupaj približno 320000 stanovanj, od česar bi podjetje Habidite ob proizvodnji 1403 stanovanj v letu 2011 pokrivalo 0,4-odstotni tržni delež.
The average price to be thus obtained by BIZKAILUR for the 1500 houses was of EUR 2010,19/sqm, which is below the average price for houses sold freely on the market in the province of Bizkaia in 2007, of EUR 2921,9/sqm.
Povprečna cena, ki naj bi jo podjetje BIZKAILUR tako pridobilo za 1500 stanovanj, je znašala 2010,19 EUR/m2, kar je manj od povprečne cene stanovanj, ki so se leta 2007 prosto prodajala na trgu v provinci Bizkaia, tj. 2921,9 EUR/m2.
Furthermore, Habidite would have obtained only 83 %, and respectively 83,30 % (in the case of the 750 houses under 75 sqm) of the EUR 2010,19/sqm which were obtained by BIZKAILUR itself from the sale of these houses under the semi-protected regime.
Poleg tega bi podjetje Habidite dobilo le 83 % oziroma 83,30 % (za 750 stanovanj površine manj kot 75 m2) od cene 2010,19 EUR/m2, ki jo je pridobilo podjetje BIZKAILUR od prodaje stanovanj v okviru delno zaščitenega sistema.
A further indication that Habidite would have been alleviated through this contract of a considerable part of the risk associated with selling its product on the market stems from Habidite's own Business Plan (dated November 2008) as submitted in view of obtaining the 2008 regional aid.
Dodaten znak, da bi se na podlagi navedene pogodbe podjetje Habidite izognilo znatnemu delu tveganja, povezanega s prodajo njegovega proizvoda na trgu, izhaja iz poslovnega načrta podjetja Habidite (iz novembra 2008), ki ga je to predložilo za pridobitev regionalne pomoči za leto 2008.
In this Business Plan, Habidite estimated the total demand for houses to be sold on the regulated market in the entire Basque Country for the years 2011-2016 at approximately 8000 houses per year.
Podjetje Habidite je v poslovnem načrtu ocenilo, da bi celotno povpraševanje po stanovanjih, ki naj bi se prodajala na reguliranem trgu v celotni Baskiji v obdobju 2011–2016, znašalo približno 8000 stanovanj na leto.
As already mentioned in recital (98), the 1500 houses stipulated by this contract were estimated to be delivered during the period 2009-2011.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (98), naj bi se 1500 stanovanj, predvidenih v pogodbi o stanovanjih, dobavilo v obdobju 2009–2011.
Moreover, the Diputación did not argue that the contract was concluded with a view to providing a service of general economic interest such as social housing.
Poleg tega podjetje Diputación ni trdilo, da je bila pogodba sklenjena z namenom zagotavljanja storitve splošnega gospodarskega interesa, kot so socialna stanovanja.
Also, according to the Diputación, Habidite and the AFER group did not qualify on 15 December 2006 as firms in difficulty within the meaning of Points 9, 10 and 11 of the 2004 R&R Guidelines.
Poleg tega se po navedbah podjetja Diputación podjetje Habidite in skupina AFER 15. decembra 2006 nista štela za podjetji v težavah v skladu s točkami 9, 10 in 11 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje iz leta 2004.
Therefore the latter were not eligible for rescue or restructuring aid at the time when the Land and Houses Contracts were concluded.
Zato v času sklenitve pogodbe o zemljišču in pogodbe o stanovanjih nista bila upravičena do pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
In order to be found compatible with the internal market, regional investment aid must respect a series of standard compatibility criteria, which at the time when the Land Contract was concluded, on 15 December 2006, were laid down in the 1998 Guidelines.
Da bi se regionalna pomoč za naložbe štela za združljivo z notranjim trgom, mora izpolnjevati več standardnih meril združljivosti, ki so bila v času sklenitve pogodbe o zemljišču, tj. 15. decembra 2006, določena v smernicah iz leta 1998.
In particular, the aid had to be able to contribute to regional development and to support an initial investment project on which works have started only after the aid beneficiary introduced an application for aid (incentive effect), the investment project should have been financed by the beneficiary at least up to 25 %, and the investment project should have been maintained within the assisted region where it was located for at least five years.
Zlasti je morala pomoč prispevati k regionalnemu razvoju in podpirati začetni naložbeni projekt, v zvezi s katerim se je delo začelo šele po tem, ko je upravičenec do pomoči predložil prošnjo za pomoč (spodbujevalni učinek), upravičenec je moral financirati naložbeni projekt do višine najmanj 25 % in naložbeni projekt je moral ostati vsaj pet let v regiji, upravičeni do pomoči, kjer se je začel izvajati.
The categories of expenditure thereby indicated can indeed be considered as 'eligible expenditure' within the meaning of Point 4.5. of the 1998 Guidelines.
Zgoraj navedene vrste stroškov se dejansko lahko štejejo za „upravičene stroške“ v smislu točke 4.5 smernic iz leta 1998.
Furthermore, as the aid involved in the Land Contract was linked directly to the purchase and adaptation to industrial use of the land for the new investment project, it also satisfies this requirement stemming from Point 4.5 of the 1998 Guidelines.
Ker je bila pomoč, ki jo vključuje pogodba o zemljišču, neposredno povezana z nakupom zemljišča za nov naložbeni projekt in njegovo prilagoditvijo industrijski rabi, izpolnjuje tudi zahtevo iz točke 4.5 smernic iz leta 1998.
Indeed, according to information provided by the Diputación, the purchase of the land necessary for the project, which can be considered the start of the work on this investment project, started only in May 2007, therefore at a date posterior to the signature of the Land Contract on 15 December 2006.
Dejansko se je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložilo podjetje Diputación, nakup zemljišča, potrebnega za projekt, ki se lahko šteje za začetek del v zvezi s tem naložbenim projektom, začel šele maja 2007, tj. po podpisu pogodbe o zemljišču 15. decembra 2006.
Second, the fact that the Habidite project was not carried out after the suspension of the Land and Houses Contracts can be seen as a demonstration of the fact that the aid had incentive effect: the project was not carried out in the absence of the aid.
Drugič, dejstvo, da se projekt Habidite ni izvajal po prekinitvi pogodbe o zemljišču in pogodbe o stanovanjih, se lahko šteje za dokaz, da je pomoč imela spodbujevalni učinek, saj se projekt ni izvajal brez pomoči.
It follows that the aid involved in the Land Contract would have been compatible only up to the total amount of EUR 10,5 million, and incompatible for the part eventually exceeding EUR 10,5 million.
Iz tega sledi, da bi bila pomoč, ki jo vključuje pogodba o zemljišču, združljiva le do skupnega zneska 10,5 milijona EUR, za del, ki presega 10,5 milijona UR, bi bila nezdružljiva.
Indeed, as indicated in recitals (78) to (82) and (109), the amount of aid involved in the Land Contract cannot be precisely quantified, given the dispute on the effective costs that should have been incurred by BIZKAILUR for performing its contractual obligations of purchasing and adapting to industrial use the land plot for the setup of the Habidite plant in Alonsotegi – a dispute on which the Commission is not in the position to take an informed final position.
Dejansko, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (78) do (82) in (109), zneska pomoči, ki jo vključuje pogodba o zemljišču, ni mogoče natančno opredeliti, saj so dejanski stroški, ki naj bi jih imelo podjetje BIZKAILUR za izvajanje svojih pogodbenih obveznosti nakupa in prilagoditev industrijski rabi zemljišča za ustanovitev tovarne Habidite v mestu Alonsotegi, predmet spora, Komisija pa v zvezi s tem ne more sprejeti argumentiranega dokončnega stališča.
To conclude, the compatibility conditions of the 2002 Framework would have also been satisfied by the part of the aid involved in the Land Contract not exceeding the permissible amount of maximum EUR 10,5 million.
Del pomoči iz pogodbe o zemljišču, ki ne presega dopustnega največjega zneska 10,5 milijona EUR, bi torej tudi izpolnjeval pogoje za združljivost iz okvira iz leta 2001.
The amount of aid eventually exceeding this ceiling would not have been compatible with the Treaty as not satisfying the compatibility conditions of the 1998 Guidelines and the 2002 Framework.
Pomoč, ki presega to zgornjo mejo, ne bi bila združljiva s pogodbo, ker ne bi izpolnjevala pogojev za združljivost, določenih v smernicah iz leta 1998 in okviru iz leta 2002.
See Commission Decision of 17.5.2000 concerning State Aid N 773/99 Spain, approving the regional aid map for Spain for the period 2000-2006.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 17.5.2000 o državni pomoči št. 773/99 Španije, s katerim se odobri karta regionalnih pomoči za Španijo za obdobje 2000–2006.
This Decision is available at http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/state_aids/comp-1999/n773-99.pdf.
Sklep je na voljo na spletnem naslovu http://ec.europa.eu/eu_law/state_aids/comp-1999/n773-99.pdf.
B.O.E. 96 of 22.04.1986.
BOE 96 z dne 22.4.1986.
These comments were transmitted to the Spanish authorities by letter of 15 April 2010, who replied by letter of 12 May 2010.
Te pripombe so bile z dopisom z dne 15. aprila 2010 predložene španskim organom, ki so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 12. maja 2010.
Furthermore, the costs for adapting 254785 sqm of land to industrial use, which the Diputación claims to be of EUR 28,5 million, were erroneous.
Stroški za prilagoditev 254785 m2 zemljišča za industrijsko rabo, ki so po trditvah podjetja Diputación znašali 28,5 milijona EUR, so prav tako napačni.
These costs seemed to correspond rather to costs that were incurred by the Diputación for a different project, namely the construction of the Kadagua highway, segment Kastrexana Arbuio-Sodupe.
Zdi se, da ti stroški dejansko ustrezajo stroškom, ki jih je podjetje Diputación imelo pri drugem projektu, in sicer pri izgradnji odseka Kastrexana Arbuio-Sodupe avtoceste Kadagua.
However, as indicated at recitals (60) to (62), the aid granted through the Land and Houses Contracts was unlawfully granted (i.e. prior to notification to the Commission) on 15 December 2006.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (60) do (62), je bila pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi pogodbe o zemljišču in pogodbe o stanovanjih, nezakonito dodeljena 15. decembra 2006 (tj. pred priglasitvijo Komisiji).
Its compatibility must therefore be assessed on the basis of the state aid rules in force at the time when it was granted.
Njeno združljivost je zato treba oceniti na podlagi pravil o državni pomoči, ki so veljala ob njeni dodelitvi.
on State aid case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland
o državni pomoči SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) – Različne stopnje takse, ki se na Irskem uporabljajo za letalska potovanja
(notified under document C(2012) 5037)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 5037)
In 2009, the Commission received a State aid complaint from an airline operator (hereafter "complainant") regarding several aspects of the air travel tax implemented by Ireland including the differentiated tax rates applicable to flights with destinations located no more than 300 km from Dublin airport, which allegedly favoured Aer Arann.
Letalski prevoznik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) je leta 2009 Komisiji poslal pritožbo v zvezi z državno pomočjo glede več vidikov takse na letalska potovanja, ki se uporablja na Irskem, vključno z različnimi stopnjami takse, ki se uporabljajo za lete do destinacij v oddaljenosti največ 300 km od letališča v Dublinu, zaradi katerih naj bi bila družba Aer Arann v prednostnem položaju.
By letter dated 13 July 2011, the Commission informed Ireland that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty in respect of the differentiated tax rates applied under the Irish air travel tax.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 13. julija 2011 Irsko obvestila, da bo v zvezi različnimi stopnjami takse, ki se uporabljajo v skladu z irsko takso na letalska potovanja, začela postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe.
The Commission asked the Irish authorities to forward a copy of the decision to the beneficiaries.
Komisija je od irskih organov zahtevala, da upravičencem pošljejo kopijo odločbe.
On 9 August 2011 and 5 September 2011, the airline operator Ryanair Ltd. (hereafter "Ryanair") submitted letters regarding the Commission's decision to initiate the proceedings.
Letalski prevoznik Ryanair Ltd. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Ryanair) je 9. avgusta in 5. septembra 2011 predložil dopisa v zvezi s sklepom Komisije, da bo začela postopek.
Following an extension of the deadline to reply, the Irish authorities submitted their observations on the Commission's decision on 15 September 2011.
Irski organi so 15. septembra 2011 po podaljšanju roka za odgovor predložili svoje pripombe v zvezi s sklepom Komisije.
On 18 October 2011, the Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Sklep Komisije o začetku postopka je bil 18. oktobra 2011 objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their observations on the measure.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi z ukrepom.
On 17 November 2011, Ryanair submitted its response to that invitation.
Družba Ryanair je 17. novembra 2011 kot odgovor na ta poziv predložila svoje pripombe.
By letter of 28 November 2011, the Commission asked Ryanair whether any information in Ryanair's submission was confidential and could not be disclosed to the Irish authorities.
Komisija je družbo Ryanair z dopisom z dne 28. novembra 2011 pozvala, naj ji pojasni, ali so kakršne koli informacije v predloženih pripombah zaupne in se ne smejo razkriti irskim organom.
By letter of 30 November 2011, Ryanair confirmed that the submission of 17 November 2011 could be forwarded to the Irish authorities.
Družba Ryanair je z dopisom z dne 30. novembra 2011 potrdila, da se lahko pripombe, predložene 17. novembra 2011, pošljejo irskim organom.
By letter of 12 December 2011, the Commission forwarded Ryanair's comments to the Irish authorities, which provided their comments thereon on 13 January 2012.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 12. decembra 2011 irskim organom poslala pripombe družbe Ryanair, ti pa so nato svoje pripombe predložili 13. januarja 2012.
As of 30 March 2009, the Irish authorities introduced an excise duty on air passenger transport.
Irski organi so s 30. marcem 2009 uvedli trošarino na potniški letalski prevoz.
The national legal basis for the tax is section 55 of the Finance (No. 2) Act 2008, which introduces an excise duty referred to as the "air travel tax" which the airline operators are liable to pay in respect of "every departure of a passenger on an aircraft from an airport" located in Ireland [3].
Nacionalna pravna podlaga za takso je razdelek 55 Zakona o financah (št. 2) iz leta 2008, ki uvaja trošarino, imenovano „taksa na letalska potovanja“, ki so jo letalski prevozniki dolžni plačati ob „vsakem odhodu potnika na letalu z letališča“ na Irskem [3].
The tax becomes due at the time a passenger departs from an airport on an aircraft capable of carrying more than 20 passengers and not used for State or military purposes.
Plačilo takse zapade, ko letalo, na katerem je potnik in s katerim lahko potuje več kot 20 potnikov ter ki ga ne uporablja država ali vojska, vzleti z letališča.
While the tax in fine is intended to be passed on to the passengers via the ticket price, it is the airline operators that are accountable for it and liable to pay it [4].
Predvideno je bilo, da se taksa prek cene letalske vozovnice prenese na potnike, vendar so letalski prevozniki tisti, ki so odgovorni za pobiranje in plačilo takse [4].
At the time of its introduction, the tax was levied on the basis of the distance between the airport where the flight began and the airport where the flight ended, at the rate of (i) EUR 2 in the case of a flight from an airport to a destination located no more than 300 km from Dublin airport and (ii) EUR 10 in any other case.
Taksa se je ob uvedbi določala na podlagi razdalje med letališčem začetka in letališčem konca potovanja, in sicer v višini (i) 2 EUR, če je bila razdalja od letališča v Dublinu do končne destinacije največ 300 km, ter v višini (ii) 10 EUR v vseh ostalih primerih.
Following an investigation by the Commission regarding a possible infringement of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community [5] and Article 56 of the Treaty on the freedom to provide services, the rates were changed as of 1 March 2011 so that a single tax rate of EUR 3 is applicable to all departures, regardless of the distance travelled [6].
Po preiskavi Komisije v zvezi z morebitno kršitvijo Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. septembra 2008 o skupnih pravilih za opravljanje zračnih prevozov v Skupnosti [5] ter člena 56 Pogodbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev se je s 1. marcem 2011 spremenila stopnja takse, tako da se enotna taksa v višini 3 EUR uporablja za vse odhode, ne glede na prepotovano razdaljo [6].
The Commission initiated the formal procedure regarding the lower tax rate, which was applicable for certain routes during the period 30 March 2009 until 1 March 2011, because it considered that it appeared to constitute State aid and had doubts regarding its compatibility with the internal market.
Komisija je začela formalni postopek v zvezi z nižjo takso, ki se je uporabljala za nekatere letalske proge v obdobju od 30. marca 2009 do 1. marca 2011, saj je menila, da gre za državno pomoč, in je imela pomisleke glede njene združljivosti z notranjim trgom.
In its assessment of whether the measure was selective, in line with established case-law [7], the Commission first identified the relevant tax system of reference, and thereafter analysed whether the measure constituted a derogation from that system and, if so, whether Ireland had demonstrated that the derogation was in the nature and logic of the tax system.
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso [7] je Komisija v svoji oceni, ali je ukrep selektiven, najprej opredelila zadevni referenčni davčni sistem in nato analizirala, ali ukrep pomeni odstopanje od navedenega sistema, in če je odgovor pritrdilen, ali je Irska dokazala, da je takšno odstopanje značilno in logično za davčni sistem.