natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The subsidy rate thus established with regard to this scheme during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,13 % which is the arithmetical average rate for similar programmes as established in the US Decision Memorandum of 6 April 2009 on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts (Page No. 6) (Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 69, page 16836 / 13 April 2009), the US Decision Memorandum of 14 May 2010 on Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (Page No. 29) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 98, page 28557 / 21 May 2010), the US Decision Memorandum of 28 May 2010 on Certain Steel Grating (Page No. 18) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 109, page 32362 / 8 June 2010), the US Decision Memorandum of 28 March 2011 on Aluminium Extrusions (Page No. 19) (Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 64, page 18521 / 4 April 2011) and the US Decision Memorandum of 11 October 2011 on Multi-layered Wood Flooring (Page No. 17) (Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 201, page 64313 / 18 October 2011).
Stopnja subvencije za to shemo v OP, določena na tak način za vse nesodelujoče družbe, znaša 0,13 % ter je enaka aritmetični sredini stopenj za sorodne programe, kakor so bile določene v Memorandumu o sklepu ZDA z dne 6. aprila 2009 o citrinski kislini in nekaterih citratih (str. 6) (Zvezni register ZDA/zvezek 74, št. 69, str. 16836 / 13. april 2009), Memorandumu o sklepu ZDA z dne 14. maja 2010 o prednapetih jeklenih pletenicah za betonske elemente (str. 29) (Zvezni register ZDA/zvezek 75, št. 98, str. 28557 / 21. maj 2010), Memorandumu o sklepu ZDA z dne 28. maja 2010 o nekaterih jeklenih rešetih (str. 18) (Zvezni register ZDA/zvezek 75, št. 109, str. 32362 / 8. junij 2010), Memorandumu o sklepu ZDA z dne 28. marca 2011 o iztiskanih izdelkih iz aluminija (str. 19) (Zvezni register ZDA/zvezek 76, št. 64, str. 18521 / 4. april 2011) in Memorandumu o sklepu ZDA z dne 11. oktobra 2011 o večslojnih lesenih talnih oblogah (str. 17) (Zvezni register ZDA/zvezek 76, št. 201, str. 64313 / 18. oktober 2011).
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from grant programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [76].
V zvezi s preiskavami organov ZDA je treba omeniti, da je metodologija za izračun zneska ugodnosti po programih nepovratnih sredstev v bistvu enaka tisti, ki jo je uporabila EU [76].
Famous Brands programme and sub-programmes (Chongqing Famous Brands, Hubei Province Famous Brands, Ma'anshan Famous Brands, Shandong Province Top Brands, Wuhan Famous Brands)
Program znane znamke in njegovi podprogrami (znane znamke Chongqinga, znane znamke province Hubei, znane znamke Ma‘anshana, najboljše znamke province Shandong, znane znamke Wuhana)
The legal bases of this programme as reported in the complaint with regard to the Shandong sub-programme are the following:
Pravna podlaga za ta program, kot je navedeno v pritožbi v zvezi s podprogramom za Shandong, so naslednji predpisi:
Notice on Printing and Distribution of 2003 Policies for Encouraging and expanding Foreign Trade Export to Shandong, LWJMJCZ, [2003] No 180;
Obvestilo o tiskanju in razdelitvi politik za spodbujanje in porast zunanjetrgovinskega izvoza v Shandongu za leto 2003, LWJMJCZ, [2003] št. 180;
2004 Policies for Encouraging the Development of Foreign Trade & Economic Cooperation in Shandong, LWJMJCZ, [2003] No 1037;
Politike za spodbujanje in razvoj zunanje trgovine in gospodarskega sodelovanja v Shandongu za leto 2004, LWJMJCZ, [2003] št. 1037;
2005 Policies for Encouraging the Development of Foreign Trade & Economic Cooperation in Shandong;
Politike za spodbujanje in razvoj zunanje trgovine in gospodarskega sodelovanja v Shandongu za leto 2005;
Notice on Printing and Distribution of 2006 Policies for Encouraging the Development of Foreign Trade & Economic Cooperation in Shandong, LCQ [2006] No 5.
Obvestilo o tiskanju in razdelitvi politik za spodbujanje in porast zunanje trgovine in gospodarskega razvoja v Shandongu za leto 2006, LCQ, [2006] št. 5;
Special Award Fund Budget for the Development of Self-Exporting Brands, Lucaiqizhi, 2008, No 75.
Posebna dodelitev sredstev iz proračuna sklada za razvoj lastnih izvoznih znamk, Lucaiqizhi, 2008, št. 75.
This programme confers benefits to producers of products designated as "Famous Brands" and meant for export markets.
Ta program prinaša ugodnosti za proizvajalce izdelkov z oznako „znane znamke“, namenjenih izvoznim trgom.
The complaint refers to a number of producers of the product concerned having benefited from this programme until at least 2009.
Pritožba se sklicuje na številne proizvajalce zadevnega izdelka, ki so koristili ugodnosti po tem programu vsaj do leta 2009.
The complaint asserts that this programme was designed to promote domestic advanced industries and encourage exports of their products to the world markets.
Trditev iz pritožbe je bila, da je bil ta program zasnovan za spodbujanje domačih naprednih industrij in izvoza izdelkov teh industrij na svetovne trge.
The main framework of this programme is set in the central programme, and provincial and local governments develop their own famous brands programmes consistently with the central programme to promote the export of local products.
Glavni okvir za ta program je določen v centralnemu programu, provincialne in lokalne vlade pa razvijajo lastne programe znanih znamk v skladu s centralnim programom, da bi spodbujale izvoz lokalnih izdelkov.
The USA have challenged this grant programme at the WTO (DS 387).
ZDA so o tem programu nepovratnih sredstev sprožile spor v WTO (zadeva DS 387).
In addition, the US authorities have countervailed this programme in several proceedings referred to in the complaint.
Poleg tega so organi ZDA v številnih postopkih, na katere se sklicuje pritožba, proti temu programu uvedli izravnalne ukrepe.
The Commission has also countervailed the benefits under this programme in the Coated fine paper case [77].
Tudi Komisija je v zadevi o premazanem finem papirju [77] sklenila, da se proti ugodnosti po tem programu uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
The 'famous brands' programme provides financial contributions in the form of subsidised interest loans, R&D funding, and cash grant rewards for exporting.
Program „znane znamke“ zagotavlja finančni prispevek v obliki posojil s subvencionirano obrestno mero, financiranja raziskav in razvoja ter dodelitev gotovinskih nepovratnih sredstev za izvažanje.
These incentives constitute a direct transfer of funds conferring a benefit upon the recipients within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) and Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
Te spodbude se štejejo kot neposreden prenos sredstev, ki prejemnicam prinaša ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(i) in (2) osnovne uredbe.
This subsidy is specific under Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation because the legislation limits access only to those enterprises recognised to export products designated as 'famous brands'.
Ta subvencija je specifična na podlagi člena 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe, ker zakonodaja omejuje dostop do nje na samo tiste družbe, ki so priznane izvoznice izdelkov oznake „znane znamke“.
Furthermore, given the apparent absence of objective criteria and conditions for the application of this programme by the granting authority, specificity is also found under Article 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je ta subvencija tudi specifična na podlagi člena 4(2)(b) osnovne uredbe, glede na vidno odsotnost objektivnih meril in pogojev za prijavo za ta program.
The preferential treatment under this programme is also specific according to Article 4(4)(a) of the basic Regulation because its benefits are contingent upon export performance of the relevant 'famous brand' products.
Tudi ugodnejša obravnava po tem programu je specifična v skladu s členom 4(4)(a) osnovne uredbe, ker so ugodnosti obravnave odvisne od opravljenega izvoza ustreznih izdelkov „znanih znamk“.
In the absence of precise quantification elsewhere, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been comparable decisions (based on similarity in the nature of the programme) by the US authorities.
Ob odsotnosti točne opredelitve kjer koli drugje so bili primerljivi sklepi organov ZDA (na podlagi sorodnega značaja programa) najustreznejši vir za informacije, s katerimi bi se ocenile ugodnosti za proizvajalce izvoznike.
With regard to investigations conducted by the US authorities, it is noted that the methodology used for calculating the amount of benefit from grant programmes is substantially the same as that employed by the Union [78].
V zvezi s preiskavami organov ZDA je treba omeniti, da je metodologija za izračun zneska ugodnosti po programih nepovratnih sredstev v bistvu enaka tisti, ki jo je uporabila Unija [78].
Non-cooperation by the Government of China
Nesodelovanje kitajske vlade
In its questionnaire reply GOC only stated that this programme has been terminated in 2003 and that none of the sampled exporters has benefited from it.
Kitajska vlada je v izpolnjenem vprašalniku le izjavila, da se je ta program zaključil leta 2003 in da nobeden od vzorčenih izvoznikov ni prejel ugodnosti po tem programu.
As the GOC has not supplemented this reply with any underlying evidence or further clarification, the Commission analyses this programme on the basis of facts available pursuant to Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Ker kitajska vlada svojega odgovora ni dopolnila z ustreznimi dokazili ali ga nadalje pojasnila, je Komisija ta program v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe analizirala na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
The legal bases of this programme referred to in the complaint are the following:
Pravna podlaga za ta program, kot je navedeno v pritožbi, so naslednji predpisi:
State Circulars:
okrožnice države:
Guojingmao Touzi No 886 of 1999, Guojingmao Touzi No 122 of 1999, Guojingmao Touzi No 1038 of 1999, Guojingmao Touzi No 822 of 2000 and
Guojingmao Touzi št. 886 iz leta 1999, Guojingmao Touzi št. 122 iz let 1999, Guojingmao Touzi št. 1038 iz leta 1999, Guojingmao Touzi št. 822 iz leta 2000 in
Measures for the Administration of National Debt Special Fund for National Key Technology Renovation Projects
Ukrepi za upravljanje posebnega sklada nacionalnega dolga za ključne nacionalne projekte tehnološke prenove.
Given the lack of cooperation of the GOC, the Commission relies on the elements included in the complaint and/or on the other sources mentioned in the complaint [79].
Glede na pomanjkljivo sodelovanje kitajske vlade se je Komisija opirala na elemente, vključene v pritožbi, in/ali druge vire, omenjene v pritožbi [79].
According to the complaint, the fund has supported 47 iron and steel enterprises with respect to investments totalling RMB 75 billion.
Navedba iz pritožbe je bila, da je sklad zagotovil podporo 47 železarskim in jeklarskim družbam pri naložbah v skupnem znesku 75 milijard CNY.
The US authorities have countervailed this programme in at least two proceedings.
Organi ZDA so proti temu programu uvedli izravnalne ukrepe v najmanj dveh postopkih.
The programme constitutes a subsidy as it provides financial contributions in the form of grants for the acquisition of fixed assets in accordance with Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation, which confers a benefit to the recipient.
Ta program se šteje kot subvencija, saj zagotavlja finančni prispevek v obliki nepovratnih sredstev za nakup osnovnih sredstev, ki prejemniku prinaša ugodnosti v skladu s členom 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
Since the subsidy is linked to fixed assets and is allocated over time, it is concluded, on the basis of facts available, that this benefit continues into the IP.
Ker je subvencija vezana na osnovna sredstva in dodeljena čez daljše obdobje, je bilo na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev sklenjeno, da ta ugodnost traja v OP.
This subsidy is specific in the meaning of Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation as the support is limited to certain large-sized state-owned enterprises and state-holding enterprises among 512 key enterprises and 120 pilot enterprise groups.
Ta subvencija je specifična v smislu člena 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe, saj je podpora omejena na nekatere velike družbe v državni lasti in velike družbe, v katerih ima država lastniški delež ter ki sodijo med 512 ključnih družb in 120 pilotnih skupin družb.
In so far as the project focuses on companies located in specifically designated geographical regions of the old industrial base in north-east, central and west areas, it is also specific within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation.
Če projekt cilja na družbe s posebej določenih geografskih območij starih baz industrije s severovzhodnih, osrednjih in zahodnih območij, je tudi specifičen v smislu člena 4(3) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of precise quantification elsewhere, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been a similar decision by the US authorities, namely the US Decision Memorandum of 10 September 2010 on Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Page No 19) (Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 182, page 57444 / 21 September 2010).
Ob odsotnosti točne opredelitve kjer koli drugje je bil najustreznejši vir za informacije, da bi se ocenile ugodnosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, podoben sklep organov ZDA, tj. Memorandum o sklepu ZDA z dne 10. septembra 2010 o nekaterih standardih, celih vodih in tlačnih ceveh iz ogljičnega in legiranega jekla (str. 19) (Zvezni register ZDA, zvezek 75, št. 182, str. 57444 / 21. september 2010).
The subsidy rate thus established with regard to this scheme during the IP for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,01 % which is the rate for a similar scheme as established in the US decision referred to in the preceding recital.
Stopnja subvencije za to shemo v OP, določena na tak način za vse nesodelujoče družbe, znaša 0,01 % ter je enaka stopnji za sorodno shemo, kakor je bila določena v sklepu ZDA iz prejšnje uvodne izjave.
No cooperation by the GOC
Nesodelovanje kitajske vlade
The complaint referred to various investigations carried out by the US authorities [80] and the Commission (Coated Fine Paper proceeding) which found countervailable several provincial programmes under which 40 % of the legal fees for a company's participation in anti-dumping proceeding was refunded by the local financial bureau.
Pritožba se je sklicevala na različne preiskave organov ZDA [80] in Komisije (postopek v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem), v katerih so bili uvedeni izravnalni ukrepi proti številnim provincialnim programom, v skladu s katerimi je lokalni finančni urad družbam za njihovo udeležbo v protidampinškem postopku povrnil 40 % stroškov pravnega svetovanja.
As the GOC decided not to reply to questions on this programme, merely stating that the sampled exporters had not benefited from it, the Commission bases its findings on the evidence available on the file according to Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Ker je kitajska vlada sklenila, da na vprašanja o tem programu ne bo odgovarjala in je izjavila le, da vzorčeni izvozniki niso prejeli ugodnosti po tem programu, je Komisija svoje ugotovitve v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe utemeljila na razpoložljivih dokazih v spisu.
According to the complaint and the Commission decision in Coated Fine Paper (recital 193), the legal basis of this programme is the following:
V skladu s pritožbo in sklepom Komisije v postopku v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem (iz uvodne izjave (193)) so pravna podlaga za ta program:
Rules for the Implementation of the Support Policy for the Anti-dumping, Anti-subsidy, Safeguard investigation respondent
Pravila za izvajanje politike podpore udeležencem v protidampinški, protisubvencijski in zaščitni preiskavi.
This programme is available for companies involved in the anti-dumping investigations and working in compliance with the instructions of the Ministry of Commerce and provincial authorities.
Ta program je na voljo družbam, vključenim v protidampinške preiskave, ki delujejo v skladu z navodili ministrstva za gospodarstvo in provincialnih organov.
This programme constitutes a subsidy as it provides financial contribution in the form of a direct transfer of funds in the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation in order to cover legal fees in anti-dumping proceedings and confers a benefit within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
Ta program se šteje kot subvencija, saj zagotavlja finančni prispevek v obliki neposrednega prenosa sredstev v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(i) osnovne uredbe za kritje stroškov pravnega svetovanja v protidampinških postopkih in prinaša ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe.
This subsidy is specific under Article 4(2)(a) and (c) of the basic Regulation because it is restricted to certain enterprises that are subject to foreign anti-dumping proceedings.
Ta subvencija je specifična na podlagi člena 4(2)(a) in (c) osnovne uredbe, ker je omejena na nekatere družbe, ki so predmet protidampinških postopkov v tujini.
Furthermore, this programme is also specific within the terms of Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation given that it is limited to certain enterprises registered in the designated geographical regions governed by the relevant provincial authorities implementing this programme.
Poleg tega je ta program specifičen tudi na podlagi člena 4(3) osnovne uredbe, ker je omejen na nekatere družbe s sedežem na določenih geografskih območjih, ki jih upravljajo zadevni provincialni organi, ki ta program izvajajo.
In the absence of information for the assessment of this benefit and since this programme has already been examined in a previous anti-subsidy proceeding by the Union institutions, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been the assessment made for this programme in the Coated Fine Paper proceeding, duly adjusted if needed as mentioned in recital (252) above.
Ob odsotnosti informacij za oceno te ugodnosti in ker so institucije Unije ta program že preiskale v drugem protisubvencijskem postopku v preteklosti, je bila najprimernejši vir informacij, da bi se ocenile ugodnosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ocena tega programa iz postopka v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem, po potrebi ustrezno prilagojena, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (252).
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,01 % on the basis of Coated Fine Paper findings [81].
Stopnja subvencije, določena na tak način za vse nesodelujoče družbe, znaša 0,01 % na podlagi ugotovitev iz postopka v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem [81].
PURCHASE OF GOODS BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR HIGHER THAN ADEQUATE REMUNERATION
DRŽAVNI NAKUP BLAGA ZA VEČ KOT USTREZNO NADOMESTILO
The complaint contained evidence that the GOC purchased through SOEs steel products manufactured by OCS producers.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze, da je kitajska vlada prek družb v državni lasti kupila jeklene izdelke, ki so jih proizvedli proizvajalci jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi.
The complaint referred to the GOC purchases of a number of steel outputs, including colour-coated sheet, hot-rolled sheet coils, cold-rolled sheet, medium plates, galvanised sheet, and many others.
Pritožba je navajala, da je kitajska vlada kupila številne jeklene proizvode, vključno z barvano pločevino, vroče valjano pločevino v kolobarjih, hladno valjano pločevino, plošče srednje debeline, pocinkano pločevino in številne druge izdelke.
The complaint showed that the price for the purchase of these goods by SOEs was set by reference to different elements and/or benchmarks, and that there were price caps or adjustments depending on the different goods and on whether the transaction concerned related parties.
Pritožba je pokazala, da je bila nakupna cena tega blaga za družbe v državni lasti referenčno določena glede na različne sestavine in/ali referenčne vrednosti ter da so bile cene navzgor zamejene ali prilagojene glede na različno blago in to, ali je posel zadeval povezane strani.
The GOC replied by reference to its general arguments concerning SOEs that it has not been demonstrated that purchasers SOEs of these steel products were public bodies within the meaning of the WTO SCM Agreement and that it was impossible for the GOC to collect transaction-specific data with regard to unknown entities.
Kitajska vlada se je v odgovoru sklicevala na svoje splošne utemeljitve o družbah v državni lasti, in sicer da ni bilo dokazano, da so družbe v državni lasti, ki so kupile te jeklene izdelke, javni organi v smislu sporazuma o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih WTO ter da ni mogla zbrati podatkov, specifičnih za vsak posel, v zvezi z neznanimi subjekti.
The GOC also stated that the complaint did not refer to any purchase of goods involving the sampled exporters.
Kitajska vlada je izjavila tudi, da se pritožba ni sklicevala na noben nakup blaga, ki bi vključeval vzorčene izvoznike.
The Commission refers to its conclusions on purchasers of OCS and other steel products being SOEs (recitals (49) - (73) above) and to the request to the GOC to provide information also concerning non-sampled exporters (see recitals (34) and (35) above).
Komisija se na tem mestu sklicuje na svoje sklepe, da so družbe, ki kupujejo jeklene izdelke, prevlečene z organskimi premazi, in druge jeklene izdelke, družbe v državni lasti (uvodne izjave od (49) do (73)), ter na svojo zahtevo, da kitajska vlada predloži informacije tudi o nevzorčenih izvoznikih (glej uvodni izjavi (34) in (35)).
Given the lack of further information provided by the GOC on this programme, the Commission bases its findings on the information available on file according to Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na odsotnost dodatnih informacij, ki bi jih o tem programu posredovala kitajska vlada, Komisija v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe utemeljuje svoje ugotovitve na informacijah, na voljo v spisu.
To the extent that prices are above market prices and a benefit is conferred by the State on OCS producers through its purchasers SOEs, this programme is countervailable according to Article 3(1)(a)(iii) and Article 6(d) of the basic Regulation.
Proti temu programu se v skladu s členom 3(1)(a)(iii) in členom 6(d) osnovne uredbe lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi v obsegu, do katerega so cene višje od tržnih in je država prek svojih družb v državni lasti, ki so kupile blago, zagotovila ugodnosti za proizvajalce jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi.
It also needs to be considered that the complaint allegation that there is no reliable private price in the market because of the predominance of the public sector in the steel market has been confirmed by the investigation as SOEs have a predominant share in the steel market in China at least with regard to hot-rolled steel and cold-rolled steel (see recitals (76) to (79)).
Treba je upoštevati tudi, da je bila v preiskavi potrjena domneva iz pritožbe o neobstoju zanesljivih cen zasebnikov na trgu zaradi prevladujočega položaja javnega sektorja na jeklarskem trgu, saj imajo družbe v državni lasti prevladujoč delež na jeklarskem trgu na Kitajskem, vsaj v zvezi z vroče valjanim in hladno valjanim jeklom (glej uvodne izjave od (76) do (79)).
This subsidy is also specific under Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation as it is restricted only to selected entities participated by the State in the steel sector.
Ta subvencija je tudi specifična v smislu člena 4(2) osnovne uredbe, saj je omejena samo na izbrane subjekte iz jeklarskega sektorja, v katerih ima delež država.
However, the complexity of these transactions and of the underlying contracts coupled with the lack of the necessary details on the record did not enable the Commission to come to a firm conclusion on this programme.
Vendar sta zapletenost teh poslov in pogodb v tej zvezi ter to, da potrebne podrobnosti niso bile evidentirane, Komisiji preprečila sprejeti trden sklep o tem programu.
OTHER REGIONAL PROGRAMMES
DRUGI REGIONALNI PROGRAMI
Non-cooperation by the GOC
Nesodelovanje kitajske vlade