natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
NRAs should take into account the principle of regulatory transparency and predictability and the need to ensure stability without significant fluctuations when setting cost-oriented access prices, both when developing the costing methodology recommended in points 30 to 37 (the ‘recommended costing methodology’) and when implementing it once it is finalised or when using a methodology in accordance with point 40.
NRO bi morali pri določanju stroškovno naravnanih cen dostopa upoštevati načelo regulativne preglednosti in predvidljivosti ter potrebo po zagotavljanju stabilnosti brez večjih nihanj, tako pri razvoju v točkah 30 do 37 priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov („priporočena metodologija za izračun stroškov“), kakor pri njenem izvajanju, ko je končana, ali pri uporabi metodologije v skladu s točko 40.
NRAs should ensure that the recommended costing methodology is implemented by 31 December 2016 at the latest, with the exception of the NRAs complying with point 40.
NRO bi morali poskrbeti, da je priporočena metodologija za izračun stroškov izvedena najpozneje do 31. decembra 2016, razen NRO, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje iz točke 40.
When imposing cost-oriented access prices, NRAs may continue to apply beyond 31 December 2016 the costing methodology that they use at the time of entry into force of this Recommendation, if it meets the objectives of the recommended costing methodology as set out in recitals 25 to 28 and satisfies the following criteria: (i) if not modelling an NGA network, it should reflect a gradual shift from a copper network to an NGA network; (ii) it should apply an asset valuation method that takes into account that certain civil infrastructure assets would not be replicated in the competitive process; (iii) it should be accompanied by documented projections of copper network prices showing that they will not fluctuate significantly and therefore will remain stable over a long time period and that the alternative methodology meets the objective of regulatory transparency and predictability as well as the need to ensure price stability; and (iv) it should require only minimal modifications with respect to the costing methodology already in place in that Member State in order to meet the first three criteria.
Pri nalaganju stroškovno naravnanih cen dostopa lahko NRO po 31. decembru 2016 še naprej uporabljajo metodologijo za izračun stroškov, ki jo uporabljajo v času začetka veljavnosti tega priporočila, če dosega cilje priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov iz uvodnih izjav 25 do 28 in izpolnjuje naslednja merila: (i) če ne modelira omrežja NGA, bi morala odražati postopni prehod z bakrenega omrežja na omrežje NGA; (ii) uporabljati bi morala metodo za vrednotenje sredstev, ki upošteva, da nekatera gradbena infrastrukturna sredstva v konkurenčnem procesu ne bodo ponovljena; (iii) metodologiji bi bilo treba priložiti dokumentirane projekcije cen bakrenih omrežij, ki kažejo, da ne bodo bistveno nihale in bodo zato stabilne v dolgoročnem obdobju in da alternativna metodologija izpolnjuje njihov cilj regulativne preglednosti in predvidljivosti ter potrebo po zagotavljanju stabilnosti cen, in (iv) zahtevati bi smela le minimalne spremembe metodologije za izračun stroškov, ki je v navedeni državi članici že na voljo, da izpolni prva tri merila.
The Commission anticipates that, in light of access prices in Member States observed and bearing in mind the potential for limited local cost variations, the application of the key features of the recommended costing methodology, i.e. being based on a modern efficient network, reflecting the need for stable and predictable wholesale copper access prices over time, and dealing appropriately and consistently with the impact of declining volumes, and of the methodologies used pursuant to point 40, is likely to lead to stable copper access prices and a Union average monthly rental access price for the full unbundled copper local loop within a band between EUR 8 and EUR 10 (net of all taxes) expressed in 2012 prices (the price band).
Komisija pričakuje, da bo v smislu ugotovljenih cen dostopa v državah članicah in ob upoštevanju možnosti za omejene spremembe lokalnih stroškov uporaba ključnih elementov priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov, tj. metodologije, ki temelji na sodobnem in učinkovitem omrežju, odraža potrebo po stabilnih in predvidljivih veleprodajnih cenah dostopa do bakrenega omrežja v daljšem času ter primerno in dosledno obravnava padajoči obseg, in metodologije, ki se uporablja v skladu s točko 40, verjetno privedla do stabilnih cen za dostop do bakrenega omrežja in da se bo povprečna cena mesečnega najema popolnoma razvezanega dostopa do krajevne bakrene zanke v Uniji gibala v cenovnem območju med 8 EUR in 10 EUR (brez vseh davkov) v cenah leta 2012 (cenovno območje).
As a result of the above, in those Member States, where at the time of entry into force of this Recommendation, the monthly rental prices for the full unbundled copper local loop fall within the price band, as adjusted according to the Union average (annual) retail price index, NRAs may continue to apply until 31 December 2016 the costing methodology that they use at the time of entry into force of this Recommendation.
Posledica zgornjega je, da bodo NRO v državah članicah, v katerih se v času začetka veljavnosti tega priporočila cene mesečnega najema popolnoma razvezanega dostopa do krajevne bakrene zanke gibljejo v cenovnem območju, ki je prilagojeno v skladu s povprečnim (letnim) indeksom cen na drobno v Uniji, lahko do 31. decembra 2016 še naprej uporabljali metodologijo za izračun stroškov, ki jo uporabljajo v času začetka veljavnosti tega priporočila.
This is without prejudice to the possibility for NRAs complying with point 40 to continue to apply such methodology beyond this period.
To ne posega v možnost, da NRO, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje iz točke 40, še naprej uporabljajo takšno metodologijo tudi po izteku tega roka.
NRAs must bear in mind the objectives of regulatory transparency and predictability as well as the need to ensure price stability without significant fluctuations.
NRO morajo upoštevati cilje regulativne preglednosti in predvidljivosti ter potrebe po zagotavljanju stabilnosti cen brez večjih nihanj.
Save in cases covered by point 40, in those Member States, where, at the time of entry into force of this Recommendation, monthly rental prices for the full unbundled copper local loop fall outside the price band, NRAs should calculate costs and resulting access prices on the basis of the recommended costing methodology as soon as possible and notify the corresponding draft measure in accordance with the consultation procedure in Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC in due time, to ensure full implementation of the recommended costing methodology by 31 December 2016, bearing in mind the potential need for gradual price adjustments, in particular in those Member States where access prices are currently not cost oriented.
Razen v primerih, ki so vključeni v točko 40, bi morali NRO v državah članicah, v katerih se v času začetka veljavnosti tega priporočila cene mesečnega najema popolnoma razvezanega dostopa do krajevne bakrene zanke ne gibljejo v cenovnem območju, čim prej izračunati stroške in iz njih izhajajoče cene dostopa na podlagi priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov ter prijaviti ustrezni osnutek ukrepa v skladu s posvetovalnim postopkom iz člena 7 Direktive 2002/21/ES pravočasno, da zagotovijo celovito izvajanje priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov do 31. decembra 2016, ob upoštevanju možne potrebe po postopnem prilagajanju cen, zlasti v državah članicah, v katerih cene zdaj niso stroškovno naravnane.
The timing of the notification should take into account that where the difference between the regulated rate in place at the time of entry into force of this Recommendation and the rate resulting from the NRA’s application of the recommended costing methodology is significant, the NRA should impose access prices which ensure gradually that the rate resulting from the NRA’s application of the recommended costing methodology is reached by 31 December 2016 at the latest, taking into account the impact that sudden price adjustments may have on competition.
V časovnem načrtu za obvestilo bi bilo treba upoštevati, da bi moral NRO v primeru velike razlike med regulirano ceno, ki velja v času začetka veljavnosti tega priporočila, in ceno, ki jo oblikuje na podlagi uporabe priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov, uvesti cene dostopa, ki postopoma zagotavljajo doseganje cen, ki izhajajo iz uporabe priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov, najpozneje do 31. decembra 2016, ob upoštevanju vpliva, ki ga lahko ima nenadna prilagoditev cen na konkurenco.
For the avoidance of doubt, NRAs are not required to impose access prices within the band when they apply the recommended costing methodology or a methodology used pursuant to point 40.
Da bi se izognili dvomu, to priporočilo ne zahteva od NRO, naj uvede cene dostopa v cenovnem območju, kadar uporablja priporočeno metodologijo za izračun stroškov ali metodologijo, ki se uporablja v skladu s točko 40
NRAs intending to apply point 40 should notify the corresponding draft measure in accordance with the consultation procedure in Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as soon as possible and in due time for the Commission to review compliance with the Regulatory Framework, and this Recommendation in particular, and to ensure timely implementation.
NRO, ki nameravajo uporabljati točko 40, bi morali o osnutkih ustreznih ukrepov v skladu s postopkom posvetovanja iz člena 7 Direktive 2002/21/ES čim prej obvestiti Komisijo, in sicer pravočasno, da Komisija pregleda njihovo skladnost z regulativnim okvirom in zlasti s tem priporočilom in da zagotovi pravočasno izvajanje.
In exceptional circumstances where an NRA is not in a position, in particular due to limited resources, to finalise the recommended costing methodology by 31 December 2016, it should set interim access prices on the basis of a benchmark that only considers an average of the access rates set by NRAs in comparable countries (in terms of cost inputs) and in compliance with this Recommendation.
V izjemnih razmerah, kadar NRO zlasti zaradi omejenih sredstev ne more dokončati priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov do 31. decembra 2016, bi moral določiti začasne cene dostopa na podlagi primerjave, ki upošteva le povprečje cen dostopa, ki so jih določili NRO v primerljivih državah (z vidika vhodnih stroškov) in v skladu s pogoji tega priporočila.
BEREC, including its related working groups, in cooperation with the Commission, should assist the NRA in implementing the recommended costing methodology as soon as possible in order to overcome this limitation of resources, in particular, the cost of implementing the recommended costing methodology.
BEREC in njegove ustrezne delovne skupine bi morali v sodelovanju s Komisijo pomagati takšnim NRO pri čimprejšnjem izvajanju priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov, da premaga ta omejena sredstva in zlasti stroške izvajanja priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov.
Once NRAs have finalised the recommended costing methodology, they should consider maintaining it, in application of Article 8(5)(a) of Directive 2002/21/EC in order to promote regulatory predictability by ensuring stable access prices over at least two appropriate review periods, provided they maintain a price control obligation throughout this period.
Ko NRO zaključijo priporočeno metodologijo za izračun stroškov, bi morali poskrbeti za njeno ohranjanje ob uporabi člena 8(5)(a) Direktive 2002/21/ES, da bi izboljšali regulativno predvidljivost z zagotavljanjem stabilnih cen dostopa v vsaj dveh ustreznih obdobjih pregleda, če ohranijo obveznost nadzora cen skozi celotno obdobje.
When implementing the recommended costing methodology or alternative costing methodologies that comply with points 40 and 44, and the NRA maintains the methodology in line with point 46, NRAs should only update the data input into the costing methodology when conducting a new market review, in principle after three years.
Pri izvajanju priporočene metodologije za izračun stroškov ali alternativnih metodologij za izračun stroškov, ki so skladne s točkama 40 in 44, in če NRO ohranja skladnost metodologije s točko 46, bi moral NRO pri izvajanju novega pregleda, praviloma po treh letih, le posodobiti podatke, ki se vnašajo v metodologijo za izračun stroškov.
When updating the model, the NRAs should in principle, and provided that market conditions have remained stable, only adjust such data in line with the real evolution of individual input prices and should in any case ensure the full recovery over time of the costs incurred to provide the regulated wholesale access services.
Če so tržne razmere ostale stabilne, bi moral NRO pri posodabljanju modela praviloma le prilagoditi takšne podatke v skladu z dejanskim razvojem posameznih vhodnih cen, v vsakem primeru pa bi moral skozi čas zagotoviti popolno pokrivanje stroškov, ki so nastali za opravljanje reguliranih veleprodajnih storitev dostopa.
NRAs should publish the updated outcome of the costing methodology and resulting access prices over the relevant three-year period.
NRO bi morali objaviti posodobljeni rezultat metodologije za izračun stroškov in dobljene cene dostopa v ustreznem obdobju treh let.
The NRA should decide not to impose or maintain regulated wholesale access prices on active NGA wholesale inputs, except those inputs specified in point 49 pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2002/19/EC, where — in the same measure — the NRA imposes on the SMP operator non-discrimination obligations concerning passive and active NGA wholesale inputs pursuant to Article 10 of Directive 2002/19/EC that are consistent with:
NRO bi se moral odločiti, da ne bo uvedel ali ohranjal reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa za aktivne veleprodajne vložke omrežja NGA, razen vložkov iz točke 49 v skladu s členom 13 Direktive 2002/19/ES, kadar – v istem ukrepu – operaterju s pomembno tržno močjo nalaga obveznosti nediskriminacije za pasivne in aktivne veleprodajne vložke omrežja NGA v skladu s členom 10 Direktive 2002/19/ES, ki so skladne z:
EoI, following the procedure in point 51;
EoI na podlagi postopka iz točke 51;
obligations relating to technical replicability under the conditions set out in points 11 to 18 when EoI is not yet fully implemented; and
obveznostmi, povezanimi s tehnično ponovljivostjo pod pogoji iz točk 11 do 18, kadar se EoI še ne izvaja v celoti, in
obligations relating to the economic replicability test as recommended in point 56;
obveznostmi, povezanimi s preskusom gospodarske ponovljivosti, priporočenim v točki 56;
provided that the actual take-up of upstream passive wholesale inputs or non-physical or virtual wholesale inputs offering equivalent functionalities or the presence of alternative infrastructures create a demonstrable retail price constraint.
pod pogojem, da dejansko uveljavljanje nadrejenih pasivnih veleprodajnih vložkov omrežja ali nefizičnih ali virtualnih veleprodajnih vložkov, ki nudijo enakovredne funkcije, ali prisotnost alternativne infrastrukture lahko povzroči dokazljivo oviro za maloprodajno ceno.
The NRA should decide not to impose or maintain regulated wholesale access prices on passive NGA wholesale inputs or non-physical or virtual wholesale inputs offering equivalent functionalities, pursuant to Article 13 of Directive 2002/19/EC, where — in the same measure — the NRA imposes on the SMP operator non-discrimination obligations concerning passive NGA wholesale inputs or non-physical or virtual wholesale inputs offering equivalent functionalities, pursuant to Article 10 of Directive 2002/19/EC, that are consistent with:
NRO bi se moral odločiti, da ne bo uvedel ali ohranjal reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa za pasivne veleprodajne vložke omrežja NGA ali nefizične oziroma virtualne veleprodajne vložke, ki nudijo enakovredne funkcije, v skladu s členom 13 Direktive 2002/19/ES, kadar v istem ukrepu operaterju s pomembno tržno močjo nalaga obveznosti nediskriminacije za pasivne veleprodajne vložke omrežja NGA ali nefizične oziroma virtualne veleprodajne vložke, ki nudijo enakovredne funkcije, v skladu s členom 10 Direktive 2002/19/ES, ki so skladne z:
under the condition that:
pod pogojem, da:
the NRA can show that a legacy access network product offered by the SMP operator subject to a cost-oriented price control obligation in accordance with the costing methodology specified in points 30 to 37 or 40 constitutes a copper anchor and thus exercises a demonstrable retail price constraint; or
NRO lahko prikaže, da proizvod dostopa do starejšega omrežja, ki ga nudi operater s pomembno tržno močjo in zanj velja obveznost nadzora stroškovno naravnanih cen v skladu z metodologijo za izračun stroškov iz točk 30 do 37 ali 40, pomeni bakreno sidro, in tako uveljavlja dokazljivo oviro za maloprodajno ceno, ali
the NRA can show that operators providing retail services over one or more alternative infrastructures that are not controlled by the SMP operator can exercise a demonstrable retail price constraint.
NRO lahko prikaže, da operaterji, ki opravljajo maloprodajne storitve prek ene ali več alternativnih infrastruktur, ki jih ne nadzoruje operater s pomembno tržno močjo, lahko uveljavijo dokazljivo oviro za maloprodajno ceno.
For the purposes of this condition, ‘control’ should be interpreted in accordance with competition law principles.
Za ta pogoj bi bilo treba „nadzor“ razlagati v skladu z načeli konkurenčnega prava.
In geographic markets where the conditions listed in points 48 and 49 are fulfilled only in some areas within such markets, NRAs should differentiate remedies and maintain or impose price control obligations in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 2002/19/EC only in those areas where such conditions are not fulfilled.
Na geografskih trgih, na katerih so pogoji iz točk 48 in 49 izpolnjeni samo na nekaterih območjih takšnih trgov, bi morali NRO pripraviti različne ukrepe ter ohraniti ali uvesti obveznosti nadzora cen v skladu s členom 13 Direktive 2002/19/ES le na tistih območjih, na katerih takšni pogoji niso izpolnjeni.
NRAs should implement the recommended costing methodology so that the outcome is not affected by the imposition of differentiated remedies within a particular geographic market.
NRO bi morali izvajati priporočeno metodologijo za izračun stroškov tako, da uvedba različnih ukrepov znotraj določenega geografskega trga ne vpliva na rezultat.
An NRA is deemed to impose EoI in accordance with points 48(a) and 49(a) when it includes this remedy, which has been subject to a consultation under Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC, in the same final measure in which it decides not to impose or maintain regulated wholesale access prices on NGA wholesale inputs.
Šteje se, da NRO uvede EoI v skladu s točko 48(a) in točko 49(a), kadar vključi ta ukrep, o katerem se je posvetoval v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 2002/21/ES, v isti končni ukrep, v katerem se odloči, da ne bo uvedel ali ohranil reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa za veleprodajne vložke omrežja NGA.
The measure should include the details and the timing of the implementation of EoI (the ‘roadmap’).
Ukrep vključuje podrobnosti in časovni načrt za izvajanje EoI („načrt“).
The roadmap should include specific milestones with a timetable for implementation of each milestone.
Načrt vključuje posebne mejnike s časovnim načrtom za izvajanje vsakega mejnika.
The first milestones should, as a minimum, include obligations to ensure technical replicability and provide for imposition of the most relevant KPIs, SLAs and SLGs necessary for the provision of the key regulated wholesale services as soon as possible and no later than six months from the imposition of the EoI obligation.
Prvi mejniki bi morali vključevati vsaj obveznosti glede zagotavljanja tehnične ponovljivosti in zagotoviti uvedbo najustreznejših ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti, dogovorov o ravni storitev in jamstev za raven storitev, potrebnih za opravljanje ključnih reguliranih veleprodajnih storitev, čim prej, najpozneje pa šest mesecev od uvedbe obveznosti EoI.
NRAs should not impose regulated wholesale access prices on any regulated NGA wholesale input within the same market where the conditions set out in points 48 and 49 are met, irrespective of whether the EoI obligation is imposed on the full set of inputs in that market or if it only applies to those levels of that market that the NRA deems proportionate.
NRO ne bi smeli uvesti reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa za noben regulirani veleprodajni vložek omrežja NGA na istem trgu, na katerem so izpolnjeni pogoji iz točk 48 in 49, ne glede na to, ali je obveznost EoI naložena za celotni sklop vložkov na tem trgu ali se uporablja le za tiste ravni navedenega trga, ki so po mnenju NRO sorazmerne.
The NRA’s decision not to impose or maintain regulated wholesale access prices should not apply to civil engineering infrastructure access, whether part of the product market or imposed as an ancillary remedy.
Odločitev NRO, da ne uvede ali ohrani reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa, se ne bi smela uporabljati za dostop do gradbene infrastrukture, ki je del trga proizvoda ali uvedena kot pomožni ukrep.
When an NRA has decided to lift previously imposed regulated wholesale access prices on the basis of an agreed EoI roadmap, and the SMP operator fails to deliver the agreed milestones, the NRAs should consider to reimpose regulated wholesale access prices in line with the methodology in this Recommendation and in accordance with the principles provided for in Directive 2002/19/EC or consider to make use of its powers to impose penalties in accordance with the Regulatory Framework.
Kadar se je NRO odločil za odpravo predhodno uvedenih reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa na podlagi dogovorjenega načrta EoI in operater s pomembno tržno močjo ne zagotovi izvedbe dogovorjenih mejnikov, bi moral NRO razmisliti o ponovni uvedbi reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa v skladu z metodologijo iz tega priporočila in načeli iz Direktive 2002/19/ES ali uporabiti svoja pooblastila za uvedbo kazni v skladu z regulativnim okvirom.
NRAs should accompany the decision not to impose or maintain regulated wholesale access prices with measures, which monitor the evolution of the investment environment for NGA broadband and of competitive conditions, namely by asking operators to provide the NRA with up-to-date information on investment and NGA roll-out plans on a regular basis, which the NRA should, where legally possible, then share with the dedicated network of experts between the Commission and BEREC described in recital 69.
NRO bi morali odločitev glede neuvedbe ali ohranitve reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa dopolniti z ukrepi, s katerimi se spremljajo razvoj okolja za naložbe v širokopasovna omrežja NGA in konkurenčni pogoji, in sicer tako, da operaterje zaprosijo, naj jim redno zagotavljajo najnovejše informacije o naložbenih načrtih in načrtih uvajanja omrežij NGA, ki bi jih NRO morali, kadar je to zakonsko možno, uporabljati skupaj z namensko mrežo strokovnjakov med Komisijo in BEREC iz uvodne izjave 69.
An NRA is deemed to impose the economic replicability obligations referred to in points 48(c) and 49(c) when it includes the elements listed in points (a), (b) and (c), which have been subject to a consultation under Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC, in the same final measure in which it decides not to impose or maintain regulated wholesale access prices on NGA wholesale inputs:
Šteje se, da NRO uvede obveznosti gospodarske ponovljivosti iz točke 48(c) in točke 49(c), kadar vključi elemente iz točk (a), (b) in (c), o katerih se je posvetoval v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 2002/21/ES, v isti končni ukrep, v katerem se odloči, da ne bo uvedel ali ohranil reguliranih veleprodajnih cen dostopa za veleprodajne vložke omrežja NGA:
The details of the ex-ante economic replicability test that the NRA will apply, which should specify, at least the following parameters in accordance with the guidance provided in Annex II below:
Podrobnosti o predhodnem preskusu gospodarske ponovljivosti, ki ga bo uporabil NRO in ki bi moral navesti vsaj naslednje parametre v skladu s smernicami iz Priloge II v nadaljevanju: