natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The mandate of the current external auditors of the Bank of Greece will end after the audit for the financial year 2011.
(2) Mandat sedanjih zunanjih revizorjev Bank of Greece bo potekel po reviziji za poslovno leto 2011.
on State aid C 10/10 (ex N 562/09) which Spain intends to grant for the restructuring of A NOVO Comlink
o državni pomoči C 10/10 (ex N 562/09), ki jo Španija namerava odobriti za prestrukturiranje podjetja A NOVO Comlink
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) PDEU,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama [1],
On 16 October 2009, Spain notified a restructuring aid measure planned by the Autonomous Community of Andalusia for A NOVO Comlink SL.
Španija je 16. oktobra 2009 Komisiji priglasila ukrep za pomoč za prestrukturiranje podjetja A NOVO Comlink SL, ki ga je načrtovala avtonomna skupnost Andaluzija.
By letter dated 25 March 2010, the Commission informed Spain that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the TFEU in respect of the measure.
Z dopisom z dne 25. marca 2010 je Komisija obvestila Španijo o svoji odločitvi, da bo v zvezi s tem ukrepom sprožila postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) PDEU.
The Spanish authorities responded on 20 October 2010 by withdrawing the notification as the company’s economic situation had developed better than expected.
Španski organi so se 20. oktobra 2010 odzvali tako, da so preklicali priglasitev, saj se je gospodarski položaj podjetja razvijal boljše, kot je bilo pričakovati.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe glede pomoči.
The Commission did not receive any comments from third parties.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb tretjih strank.
The notified restructuring plan
Priglašeni načrt prestrukturiranja
The aid planned by Andalusia consisted of an 80 % guarantee for a 10-year loan of EUR 4375000 with an interest-rate subsidy of 0,89 %, and a government loan of EUR 2000000 over 10 years, granted by the Andalusia Innovation and Development Agency (IDEA).
Pomoč, ki jo je načrtovala Andaluzija, je vključevala 80-odstotno poroštvo za desetletno posojilo v vrednosti 4375000 EUR s subvencionirano obrestno mero v višini 0,89 % in desetletno državno posojilo v vrednosti 2000000 EUR, ki bi ga odobrila Andaluzijska agencija za inovacije in razvoj (IDEA).
As regards cash requirements, Spain stated in the notification that the debts outstanding at the time of drafting the restructuring measure consisted of:
V zvezi s potrebami po financiranju je Španija v priglasitvi navedla, da so dolgovi v času priprave ukrepa za prestrukturiranje vključevali:
debts of EUR 2,7 million to suppliers,
dolg dobaviteljem v višini 2,7 milijona EUR,
debts of EUR 650000 to the government,
dolg državi v višini 650000 EUR,
debts of EUR 1,6 million to other undertakings of the A NOVO Group,
dolg drugim podjetjem skupine A NOVO v višini 1,6 milijona EUR,
other needs deriving from the expansion of activities.
druge potrebe, ki izhajajo iz razširitve dejavnosti.
All this amounted to cash needs of some EUR 5 million.
Vse to je predstavljalo potrebe po financiranju v višini približno 5 milijonov EUR.
Apart from the abovementioned injection of fresh capital, the restructuring plan did not provide for any restructuring of the company’s activities, organisation and management, nor its workforce.
Razen zgoraj navedene dodelitve svežega kapitala načrt prestrukturiranja ni zagotavljal nikakršnega prestrukturiranja dejavnosti, organizacije in upravljanja podjetja niti njegove delovne sile.
As regards the company’s structure, the plan only described the current areas of activity and the possibilities and prospects for their expansion.
V zvezi s strukturo podjetja je načrt samo opisal sedanja področja dejavnosti ter možnosti in pričakovanja glede njihove razširitve.
The plan did not refer to any contribution by the beneficiary or its parent company.
Načrt se ni skliceval na noben prispevek upravičenca ali njegovega matičnega podjetja.
As regards compensatory measures, the plan did not provide for any capacity reduction or asset sales.
V zvezi z izravnalnimi ukrepi načrt ni zagotavljal nobenega zmanjšanja zmogljivosti ali prodaje sredstev.
As regards prospects, no distinction was made between best-case, intermediate and worst-case assumptions.
Glede pričakovanj se ni razlikovalo med najbolj optimističnimi, vmesnimi in najbolj pesimističnimi predvidevanji.
Measures not notified to the Commission
Ukrepi, ki niso bili priglašeni Komisiji
During the assessment of the restructuring plan, it emerged that rescue aid had been granted to A NOVO in May 2009 in the form of an 80 % guarantee on a EUR 1825000 loan for six months, with an annual premium of 1,5 % and an interest rate of 2,86 %.
Ocena načrta prestrukturiranja je pokazala, da je bila podjetju A NOVO maja 2009 dodeljena pomoč za reševanje v obliki 80-odstotnega poroštva na posojilo v vrednosti 1825000 EUR za šest mesecev z 1,5-odstotno letno premijo in 2,86-odstotno obrestno mero.
Spain did not notify this guarantee.
Španija tega poroštva ni priglasila Komisiji.
After the rescue aid was awarded on 21 May 2009, A NOVO submitted a restructuring plan to the Andalusian authorities on 10 September 2009.
Po dodelitvi pomoči za reševanje 21. maja 2009 je podjetje A NOVO andaluzijskim organom 10. septembra 2009 predložilo načrt prestrukturiranja.
A NOVO is a large company that operates in the area of after-sales activities for computers, mobile telephones and other electronic devices.
Podjetje A NOVO je veliko podjetje, ki deluje na področju vzdrževanja računalnikov, mobilnih telefonov in drugih elektronskih naprav.
It is a wholly owned subsidiary of the French company A NOVO SA.
Je hčerinsko podjetje v polni lasti francoskega podjetja A NOVO SA.
Originally, A NOVO produced telephones.
Sprva je podjetje A NOVO izdelovalo telefone.
Between 2004 and 2006 A NOVO gave up production activities and concentrated on after-sales services.
Med letoma 2004 in 2006 je podjetje A NOVO opustilo proizvodne dejavnosti in se osredotočilo na storitve vzdrževanja.
A NOVO is located in Malaga (Andalusia), in an area eligible for regional aid under the exemption in Article 107(3)(a) TFEU.
Podjetje A NOVO se nahaja v Malagi (Andaluzija), tj. na območju, ki je upravičeno do regionalne pomoči na podlagi izjeme iz člena 107(3)(a) PDEU.
At the time of notification of the restructuring plan, A NOVO fulfilled the conditions for insolvency.
V času priglasitve načrta prestrukturiranja je podjetje A NOVO izpolnilo pogoje insolventnosti.
It was having difficulties in obtaining money on the capital markets.
Imelo je težave s pridobivanjem denarja na kapitalskih trgih.
Of the initial registered capital of EUR 15 million in 2001, more than EUR 10 million had disappeared, and more than one quarter had been lost in 2008 alone:
Od začetnega osnovnega kapitala v višini 15 milijonov EUR leta 2001 je bilo izgubljenih več kot 10 milijonov EUR, več kot ena četrtina pa je bila izgubljena samo v letu 2008:
A NOVO also had high losses and a decreasing turnover:
Podjetje A NOVO je imelo tudi velike izgube in upadajoč promet:
Increasing losses
Naraščajoče izgube
Diminishing turnover
Upadanje prometa
Consequently, at the beginning of 2009, A NOVO was in difficulties according to points 10 and 11 of the Community Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (hereinafter ‘the Guidelines’) [4].
Posledično je bilo podjetje A NOVO na začetku leta 2009 v težavah v skladu s točkama 10 in 11 Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Smernice).
More than half of its registered capital had disappeared, and more than one quarter of that capital had been lost over the preceding 12 months (point 10(a) of the Guidelines).
Več kot polovica njegovega osnovnega kapitala je bila izgubljena in več kot četrtina tega kapitala je bila izgubljena v preteklih 12 mesecih (točka 10(a) Smernic).
The company therefore fulfilled the criteria under Spanish law for being subject to insolvency proceedings (point 10(c) of the Guidelines).
Podjetje je zato po španski zakonodaji izpolnilo merila za uvedbo postopkov insolventnosti (točka 10(c) Smernic).
In any case, it had diminishing overall turnover and almost nil asset value, as stipulated in point 11 of the Guidelines.
V vsakem primeru je celotni promet upadal in čista vrednost sredstev se je zmanjševala, kot določa točka 11 Smernic.
Restructuring of A NOVO had already begun in July 2005 with a view to switching activities from telephone production to after-sales services.
Prestrukturiranje podjetja A NOVO se je začelo že julija 2005 s preusmeritvijo dejavnosti od izdelave telefonov k storitvam vzdrževanja.
During the temporary suspension of employment contracts, employees continue to form part of the company.
Med začasno prekinitvijo pogodb o zaposlitvi so zaposleni še naprej del podjetja.
The measure is intended to supplement the income of the employees concerned until they reach retirement age.
Namen tega ukrepa je dopolniti prihodke zadevnih zaposlenih, dokler ne dosežejo upokojitvene starosti.
The company’s legal obligations are limited to paying the employer’s contribution to the social security system for the suspended employees, and payroll and social security costs during the period of partial retirement (between the ages of 60 and 65).
Pravne obveznosti podjetja so omejene na plačevanje prispevkov delodajalca v sistem socialne varnosti za začasno odpuščene zaposlene ter stroškov plač in socialnih zavarovanj v obdobju delne upokojitve (med 60. in 65. letom starosti).
Following an analysis of these State aid measures under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU and in the light of the Guidelines, the Commission decided to initiate the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU because it had doubts whether the conditions for approving the rescue and restructuring aid had been met.
Po analizi navedenih ukrepov državne pomoči v skladu s členom 107(3)(c) PDEU in ob upoštevanju Smernic je Komisija odločila, da sproži postopek v skladu s členom 108(2) PDEU, ker dvomi, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za odobritev pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
The Commission concluded that both measures were likely to constitute aid.
Komisija je sklenila, da bi lahko oba ukrepa predstavljala pomoč.
Under Article 107(1) TFEU, any financial support granted by a Member State which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings and which affects trade between Member States constitutes aid.
V skladu s členom 107(1) PDEU vsaka finančna podpora, ki jo dodeli država članica in izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem in ki prizadene trgovino med državami članicami, predstavlja pomoč.
The measures in question, i.e. the guarantees, the interest-rate subsidy, the loan by the region of Andalusia, and the direct payments to employees of A NOVO involve state resources.
Zadevni ukrepi, tj. poroštva, subvencionirana obrestna mera, posojilo regije Andaluzija, neposredna plačila zaposlenim podjetja A NOVO, vključujejo državna sredstva.
They were granted by the Autonomous Community of Andalusia and are imputable to the State.
Dodelila jih je avtonomna skupnost Andaluzija in zanje je odgovorna država.
The measures must confer an advantage on the recipient which it could not obtain under normal market conditions.
Ukrepi morajo prejemniku dajati prednost, ki je v običajnih tržnih pogojih ne bi mogel pridobiti.
A guarantee does not constitute such an advantage if the borrower is in financial difficulty (point 3.2(a) of the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees) [5].
Poroštvo ne pomeni takšne prednosti, če je posojilojemalec v finančnih težavah (točka 3.2(a) Obvestila Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki poroštev [5]).
The loan by Andalusia could confer an advantage.
Posojilo Andaluzije bi lahko omogočalo prednost.
The Commission has doubts that it was granted at market rates determined according to the Commission’s rules on setting market rates, laid down in the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates [6].
Komisija dvomi, da je bilo dodeljeno po tržnih cenah, predpisanih v skladu s pravili Komisije o določanju tržnih obrestnih mer, opredeljenih v Sporočilu Komisije o spremembi metode določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj [6].
Hence, the measures are likely to constitute aid which distorts competition.
Zato bi lahko bili ukrepi pomoč, ki izkrivlja konkurenco.
Furthermore, under point 13 of the Guidelines, in the case of a firm belonging to a larger business group, the Member State must demonstrate that the firm’s difficulties are intrinsic and too serious to be dealt with by the group itself.
Poleg tega mora država članica v skladu s točko 13 Smernic v primeru, da podjetje, ki pripada večji poslovni skupini, dokazati, da je vzrok težav v podjetju samem in da so težave prehude, da bi jih lahko odpravila skupina sama.
Spain has not submitted information showing whether these conditions are met.
Španija ni predložila informacij, ki bi pokazale, ali so ti pogoji izpolnjeni.
Regarding the restructuring plan, the Commission has doubts that it will lead to long-term viability, as required by points 35 and 36 of the Guidelines.
V zvezi z načrtom prestrukturiranja Komisija dvomi, da bo ta vodil k dolgoročni sposobnosti preživetja, kakor to zahtevata točki 35 in 36 Smernic.
The restructuring plan did not contain a description of internal measures to improve the firm’s viability and structure.
Načrt prestrukturiranja ni vključeval opisa notranjih ukrepov za izboljšanje sposobnosti preživetja in strukture podjetja.
The plan also lacked compensatory measures to mitigate as far as possible any adverse effects of the aid on competitors, such as a reduction in capacity (points 38 and 39 of the Guidelines).
V načrtu tudi ni bilo izravnalnih ukrepov za največje možno zmanjšanje kakršnih koli škodljivih učinkov pomoči na konkurente, kot je zmanjšanje zmogljivosti (točki 38 in 39 Smernic).
Nor was it possible to ascertain that the amount and intensity of the aid were limited to the strict minimum of the restructuring costs necessary (points 43 and 45 of the Guidelines).
Prav tako ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali sta količina in intenzivnost pomoči omejeni na najnižjo vsoto stroškov, potrebnih za prestrukturiranje (točki 43 in 45 Smernic).
Specifically, the plan lacked any reference to a contribution from the recipient.
Natančneje, v načrtu ni bilo nobenega sklicevanja na prispevek prejemnika.
Regarding the 2005 restructuring, the Commission doubts that the ‘one time, last time principle’ was respected.
Komisija v zvezi s prestrukturiranjem iz leta 2005 dvomi, da je bilo upoštevano načelo enkratnosti pomoči.
According to points 72 et seq. of the Guidelines, state intervention should not be permitted where less than 10 years have elapsed since the last rescue or restructuring aid measure has been implemented.
Glede na točko 72 in naslednje točke Smernic poseg države ni dovoljen, če je od zadnje izvedbe ukrepa za pomoč za reševanje ali prestrukturiranje preteklo manj kot 10 let.
The Commission does not have the information needed to determine whether the direct payments by the Autonomous Community of Andalusia to employees constitute aid.
Komisija nima potrebnih informacij, da bi ugotovila, ali neposredna plačila avtonomne skupnosti Andaluzija zaposlenim predstavljajo pomoč.
If the payments were made under a general social security scheme they would not be regarded as State aid.
Če so bila plačila izvedena v okviru splošnega programa socialne varnosti, ne pomenijo državne pomoči.
If they had to be borne by the company itself — under employment legislation or collective agreements — these payments would form part of the normal costs of the business.
Če bi jih moralo kriti podjetje samo – v skladu z zaposlitveno zakonodajo ali kolektivnimi pogodbami –, bi bila ta plačila del običajnih stroškov poslovanja.
If the State makes these payments, they must be counted as aid [7].
Če plačila izvede država, se morajo šteti za pomoč [7].
Therefore, it was doubtful that the rescue and restructuring aid could be considered compatible with the relevant Guidelines.
Zato je bilo vprašljivo, ali se pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje lahko obravnava kot združljiva z zadevnimi smernicami.
Spain informed the Commission by letter dated 22 October 2010 that the notified restructuring measure had not been implemented and that it was withdrawing the notification.
Španija je z dopisom z dne 22. oktobra 2010 obvestila Komisijo, da priglašeni ukrep za prestrukturiranje ni bil izveden in da preklicuje priglasitev.
As regards the classification of the guarantee as aid, Spain claimed that there would be no effect on trade.
Glede opredelitve poroštva kot pomoči je Španija trdila, da ne bo učinka na trgovino.
The after-sales services — the recipient’s area of activity — would be provided locally and limited to the territory of Spain.
Storitve vzdrževanja – prejemnikovo področje dejavnosti – bi se izvajale lokalno in bi bile omejene na ozemlje Španije.
Aid would not affect cross-border trade or appreciably hinder non-Spanish competitors from setting up operations in the Spanish market.
Pomoč ne bi škodovala čezmejni trgovini ali bistveno ovirala nešpanskih konkurentov pri uvajanju dejavnosti na španskem trgu.
There would also be no basis for providing post-sales services to Spanish end-users from outside Spanish territory.
Prav tako ne bi bilo podlage za zagotavljanje storitev vzdrževanja španskim končnim uporabnikom zunaj španskega ozemlja.
Although A NOVO was part of the French group A NOVO S.A., an important player in after-sales services in Europe, the potential indirect effect on trade would be a theoretical, and, at most, insignificant possibility and would not appreciably affect competitive relations between a group like A NOVO S.A. and its competitors given the amount of the aid in comparison with a major group like A NOVO S.A. whose turnover amounted to EUR 366 million in 2009.
Čeprav je bilo podjetje A NOVO del francoske skupine A NOVO SA, tj. pomembnega akterja v storitvah vzdrževanja v Evropi, bi bil morebiten posredni učinek na trgovino teoretična in v najboljšem primeru neznatna možnost ter glede na znesek pomoči v primerjavi z veliko skupino, kot je A NOVO SA, katere promet je v letu 2009 znašal 366 milijonov EUR, ne bi bistveno škodoval konkurenčnim razmerjem med skupino, kot je A NOVO SA, in njenimi konkurenti.
The Spanish authorities stated that the interest rate on the 21 May 2009 bank loan of EUR 1,875 million, which was 80 % guaranteed by the Junta de Andalucía for a 1,5 % annual premium, was comparable to the rates observed for loans to healthy firms.
Španski organi so navedli, da je bila obrestna mera bančnega posojila z dne 21. maja 2009 v višini 1,875 milijona EUR, za katerega je za 1,5-odstotno letno premijo organ Junta de Andalucía zagotavljal 80-odstotno poroštvo, primerljiva z obrestnimi merami posojil zdravim podjetjem.
The interest rate was 2,88 % and the reference rate published by the Commission for May 2009 was 2,22 % [8].
Obrestna mera je bila 2,88 %, referenčna mera, ki jo je za maj 2009 objavila Komisija, pa 2,22 % [8].
The Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates [9] determines the margin to be applied to loans with high collateral to healthy undertakings (rating AAA – A) of 60 basis points.
Sporočilo Komisije o spremembi metode določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj [9] določa, da se uporabi razlika 60 bazičnih točk, in sicer za posojila zdravim podjetjem z visokim zavarovanjem (ocene AAA–A).
This would give a limit of 2,82 %.
To bi določilo mejo na 2,82 %.
According to the decision granting the guarantee, the guarantee expired not later than six months after the loan was granted.
Glede na sklep o dodelitvi poroštva je poroštvo prenehalo veljati najpozneje šest mesecev po dodelitvi posojila.
The Spanish authorities also stated that the guarantee was justified due to serious social repercussions and had no unduly adverse spill-over effects in other Member States within the meaning of point 25(b) of the Guidelines.
Španski organi so tudi navedli, da je bilo poroštvo upravičeno zaradi resnih socialnih posledic in v smislu točke 25(b) Smernic ni imelo neupravičenih škodljivih učinkov prelivanja na druge države članice.
The number of people officially employed in the undertaking was 527.
V podjetju je bilo 527 uradno zaposlenih oseb.
A bankruptcy or closure of the undertaking would have affected these employees and, in addition, several hundred indirect jobs.
Stečaj ali zaprtje podjetja bi škodljivo vplivalo na te delavce in s tem tudi na več sto posrednih delovnih mest.
Given the age structure of the employees, a large part would have had difficulties in finding a new job.
Glede na starostno strukturo zaposlenih bi velik del imel težave pri iskanju nove zaposlitve.
With the high unemployment rate in Andalusia (30 % in Malaga) a closure would have caused a very serious social situation.
Zaradi visoke stopnje brezposelnosti v Andaluziji (30 % v Malagi) bi zaprtje povzročilo zelo resne socialne razmere.
Furthermore, Spain considered that, in view of the regional focus of after-sales repair services, unduly adverse spill-over effects in other Member States were unlikely.
Poleg tega je Španija menila, da so glede na regionalno osredotočenost servisnih storitev neupravičeni škodljivi učinki prelivanja na druge države članice malo verjetni.
The Spanish authorities also maintained that the conditions of point 25(c) of the Guidelines applicable to non-notified rescue aid were met, according to which the Member State must submit, no later than six months after the first authorisation of a rescue aid measure, a restructuring plan or proof that the guarantee has been terminated.
Španski organi so tudi trdili, da so bili izpolnjeni pogoji iz točke 25(c) Smernic, ki se nanašajo na nepriglašeno pomoč za reševanje in v skladu s katerimi mora država članica najpozneje šest mesecev po odobritvi ukrepa pomoči za reševanje predložiti načrt za prestrukturiranje ali dokazilo, da je poroštvo prenehalo.
Following the granting of the rescue aid on 21 May 2009, Spain notified the restructuring plan and the planned aid on 16 October 2009.
Po dodelitvi pomoči za reševanje 21. maja 2009 je Španija 16. oktobra 2009 priglasila načrt prestrukturiranja in načrtovano pomoč.
Thereby it remained within six months as from the grant of the rescue aid.
S tem je ostala znotraj šestmesečnega obdobja od dodelitve pomoči za reševanje.
Furthermore, Spain confirmed that the state guarantee was limited to six months.
Poleg tega je Španija potrdila, da je bilo državno poroštvo omejeno na šest mesecev.
Lastly, the Spanish authorities held that the amount of aid was limited to the amount needed to keep the undertaking in business during the authorisation period of six months, as required by point 25(d) of the Guidelines.
Španski organi so menili, da je bil znesek pomoči omejen na znesek, ki je potreben za delovanje podjetja v šestmesečnem obdobju odobritve, kot določa točka 25(d) Smernic.
The amount was calculated on the basis of the six-month liquidity needs and the cash deficit submitted by the company, which provided the following six-month cash flow table as part of the rescue application:
Znesek je bil izračunan na podlagi šestmesečnih likvidnostnih potreb in finančnega primanjkljaja, ki ga je predložilo podjetje, na podlagi česar je kot del zahteve za reševanje nastala naslednja tabela šestmesečnega denarnega toka:
Month 1
mesec
Month 2
mesec
Month 3
mesec
Month 4
mesec
Month 5
mesec
Month 6
mesec
Revenues
Proračun