natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It further notes that the specifications envisaged for the period after 2013 provide that the concession holder will be responsible for operating the basic service only.
Poleg tega opozarja, da je v skladu s pogodbenimi pogoji, predvidenimi za obdobje po letu 2013, pooblaščen izvajalec zadolžen le za opravljanje osnovnih storitev.
Regarding the shortage of private initiative, Corsica Ferries states that the French authorities have not established that the service offering, as it would exist under free competition, fails to meet the public service needs defined.
Glede pomanjkanja zasebne pobude družba Corsica Ferries navaja, da francoski organi niso ugotovili, ali bi ponudba storitev, ki bi obstajala v primeru svobodne konkurence, izpolnila opredeljene potrebe za opravljanje javnih storitev.
Firstly, it considers that, because of the obligations upon it, the basic service alone would respond to a real public service need.
Prvič, meni, da dejanskim potrebam po javni službi ustrezajo samo osnovne storitve, in sicer zaradi zahtev, povezanih z njimi.
However, the additional service would not meet such a need, since it concerns only passenger transport during certain periods of the year, and only for three of Corsica's six ports.
Nasprotno so dodatne storitve od njih ločene, ker vključujejo samo prevoz potnikov v nekaterih obdobjih leta, in sicer samo iz treh od šestih korziških pristanišč.
In the opinion of Corsica Ferries, this assessment is confirmed by the 40 % increase in fare caps during the summer and the fact that passengers using the additional service are essentially tourists for whom the choice of departing from Marseille or Toulon to sail to Corsica would be irrelevant.
Pri družbi Corsica Ferries bi bila ta ocena potrjena s 40-odstotnim zvišanjem zgornje meje tarif v poletnem obdobju in dejstvom, da bi bili potniki na ladjah z dodatnimi storitvami zlasti turisti, ki jim ni pomembno, ali prispejo na Korziko iz pristanišča v Marseillu ali iz pristanišča v Toulonu.
By contrast, passengers using the basic service are essentially residents of Corsica or southern France, who are more influenced by the proximity of the port of departure to their home.
Nasprotno pa bi bili potniki na ladjah z osnovnimi storitvami večinoma prebivalci Korzike ali juga Francije, ki jim je bolj pomembno, da je odhodno pristanišče čim bližje njihovemu bivališču.
According to Corsica Ferries, the growth in traffic between 2002 and 2005, characterised by a slight increase in traffic in the basic service [45], a sharp decline in traffic on the additional service [46], and an increase in traffic between Toulon and Corsica [47], clearly shows the direct competition between the offering of the additional service and its own offering of sailings from Toulon.
Po podatkih družbe Corsica Ferries je za razvoj prometa med letoma 2002 in 2005 značilno šibko povečanje prometa pri osnovnih storitvah [45], občutno zmanjšanje prometa pri dodatnih storitvah [46] in povečanje prometa med Toulonom in Korziko [47], kar dokazuje neposredno konkurenco med ponudbo dodatnih storitev in ponudbo družbe Corsica Ferries pri linijah iz Toulona.
This competition confirms the commercial and competitive nature of the additional service, which therefore does not satisfy a real public service need.
Ta konkurenca potrjuje tržnost in konkurenčnost dodatnih storitev, ki posledično ne ustrezajo resnični potrebo po javni službi.
Secondly, Corsica Ferries considers that the additional service as established by the public service delegation contract is disproportionate in relation to the Analir judgment [48], as it is manifestly oversized in relation to the traffic of the maritime connections between Marseilles and Corsica.
Drugič, družba Corsica Ferries meni, da dodatne storitve, ki jih določa pogodba o PPJS, ne bi bile sorazmerne s sodbo v zadevi Analir [48], ker bi bile očitno prevelike glede na promet na pomorskih linijah, ki povezujejo Marseille in Korziko.
Finally, Corsica Ferries argues that, on the date of the Resolution of the Corsican Assembly on 24 March 2006, the additional service could not be considered as responding to a shortage of private initiative.
Nazadnje družba Corsica Ferries trdi, da pri odločitvi z zasedanja skupščine Korzike z dne 24. marca 2006 dodatnih storitev ni bilo mogoče obravnavati kot odgovor na pomanjkanje zasebnih pobud.
It also stresses that while the level of its offering of departures from Toulon increased 455 % between 2000 and 2007, it intentionally restricts the services it offers on account of the subsidised additional service.
Prav tako poudarja, da se je njen promet na linijah iz Toulona med letoma 2000 in 2007 povečal za 445 %, zato svojo ponudbo namerno omejuje zaradi obstoja subvencioniranih dodatnih storitev.
It adds that the capacities it offers in the summer and spring-autumn periods, along with those corresponding to the basic service offered by the concession holder, would be sufficient to meet demand.
Poudarja, da zmogljivosti, ki so na voljo med poletnim obdobjem in obdobjem od pomladi do jeseni, skupaj z osnovnimi storitvami pooblaščenega izvajalca ne bi zadostile povpraševanju.
Therefore the loading ratios of the vessels of the concession holder assigned to the additional service under the 2007-2013 public service delegation contract did not initially exceed 30 % [49].
Tako navaja, da obremenitev ladij pooblaščenega izvajalca, ki so namenjene dodatnim storitvam na podlagi PPJS za obdobje 2007–2013, prvotno ne bi presegla 30 % [49].
Corsica Ferries therefore concludes that the shortage of private initiative could not be assessed in the same way following adoption of the specifications of the 2007-2013 public service delegation and in the period preceding it.
Družba Corsica Ferries na podlagi tega sklepa, da pomanjkanja zasebnih pobud po sprejetju pogodbenih pogojev o PPJS za obdobje 2007–2013 ni mogoče presojati na enak način kot v predhodnem obdobju.
Furthermore, Corsica Ferries believes that its argument applies partially to freight traffic.
Poleg tega družba Corsica Ferries meni, da njene trditve delno veljajo tudi za tovorni promet.
It adds that the development of the freight market from Toulon has not had a negative impact on the amount of goods transported within the scope of the public service delegation, thus highlighting the creation of a service that met the requirements of continuity and service quality, and responded to an unsatisfied demand.
Poudarja, da razvoj tovornega prometa iz Toulona ni negativno vplival na prevožene količine v okviru PPJS, s čimer izpostavlja oblikovanje storitve, pri kateri bi se upoštevale zahteve glede neprekinjenosti in kakovosti storitve ter ki bi zadostila potrebam, ki niso izpolnjene.
In the light of the above, Corsica Ferries considers that the first Altmark criterion is not fulfilled in this case.
Družba Corsica Ferries glede na navedeno meni, da prvo merilo iz sodbe Altmark v obravnavani zadevi ni izpolnjeno.
The secondAltmarkcriterion
Drugo merilo iz sodbe Altmark
Corsica Ferries considers that the amount of compensation should be assessed in the light of the regulations applying which make it impossible to compete with the joint concession holders.
Kar zadeva višino nadomestila, družba Corsica Ferries meni, da jo je treba oceniti na podlagi veljavnih predpisov, da bi se preprečila vsaka možnost konkuriranja med pooblaščenima soizvajalcema.
Corsica Ferries considers firstly that the public service compensation does not meet the requirements of precision, objectivity and transparency.
Družba Corsica Ferries tudi meni, da nadomestilo za opravljanje javnih storitev ne ustreza zahtevam glede natančnosti, objektivnosti in preglednosti.
It considers that the reference to the ‘abnormal and unforeseeable increase for which the carriers are not responsible’ to justify the change in peak fares is not sufficiently precise.
Ocenjuje, da sklicevanje na dvig, ki je „neobičajen, nepredvidljiv in neželen s strani prevoznikov“ in ki bi lahko upravičil razvoj najvišjih tarif, ne bi bilo dovolj natančno.
In general, financial compensation increases at a faster pace than the decline in actual revenues, and vice versa.
Na splošno bi se finančno nadomestilo povečevalo hitreje, kot bi se zniževali dejanski prihodki in obratno.
It adds that the upward revision of the forecast revenue between the bid of December 2006 and that of March 2007, under the revenue safeguard clause (Article 7 of the public service delegation contract), was designed to provide payment of further compensation in addition to the operating subsidy.
Dodaja tudi, da bi popravek predvidenih prihodkov navzgor med ponudbo iz decembra 2006 in ponudbo iz marca 2007 na podlagi klavzule o zaščiti prihodkov (člen 7 pogodbe o PPJS) povzročil plačilo dodatnega nadomestila poleg subvencije za poslovanje.
It also considers that the reference basis for determining the value of SNCM's ships was neither objective nor transparent, as this base changed substantially between the various bids tendered by the company.
Poleg tega meni, da podlaga, ki bi se uporabila kot referenca za določanje vrednosti ladij SNCM, ne bi bila niti objektivna niti pregledna, saj se je med različnimi ponudbami, ki jih je predstavila družba, močno spremenila.
Corsica Ferries further considers that the parameters for calculating the compensation related to the implementation of the safeguard clause were not established.
Družba Corsica Ferries poleg tega meni, da merila za izračun nadomestila, ki je povezano z uveljavljanjem zaščitne klavzule, niso bila opredeljena.
This uncertainty resulted in additional funding being granted to the joint concession holders.
To pomanjkanje opredelitve bi povzročilo dodatno financiranje, dodeljeno pooblaščenima soizvajalcema.
It considers that the partial compensation of the difference between forecast and actual revenue was calculated in reference to an overestimated traffic forecast.
Meni, da je bila delna izravnava razlike med predvidenimi prihodki in dejanskimi prihodki izračunana na podlagi predvidenega prometa, ki je bil previsoko ocenjen.
The thirdAltmarkcriterion
Tretje merilo iz sodbe Altmark
Corsica Ferries considers, firstly, that a 15 % rate of return on invested capital would be excessive by maritime transport standards.
Družba Corsica Ferries na eni strani meni, da bi bila donosnost kapitala v višini 15 % previsoka glede na standarde pomorskega prometa.
It considers that this effect was increased by the level at which SNCM assessed the market value of its ships.
Ta učinek je po njenem mnenju še večji zaradi višine tržne vrednosti, ki jo je SNCM pripisala svojim ladjam.
Furthermore, it considers that no effective monitoring mechanism was set up to avoid overcompensation from taking place.
Na drugi strani meni, da ni bil sprejet noben učinkovit nadzorni mehanizem, s katerim bi se preprečila čezmerna nadomestila.
The fourthAltmarkcriterion
Četrto merilo iz sodbe Altmark
Corsica Ferries argues that the public service delegation award procedure failed to ensure adequate open and effective competition.
Družba Corsica Ferries trdi, da se s postopkom dodelitve PPJS ne bi zagotovila zadostna, dejanska in odprta konkurenca.
The company believes that the outcome of this process was influenced by the economic consequences which the implementation of the termination clause would have caused had the public service delegation not been renewed.
Ocenjuje, da so na rezultat tega postopka vplivale gospodarske posledice, ki so nastale zaradi uveljavljanja razvezne klavzule v primeru nepodaljšanja PPJS. Meni tudi, da pogodbeni pogoji ne bi zagotovili učinkovite konkurence.
It also considers that the conditions imposed by the specifications failed to ensure effective competition and mentions the clause that aims to avoid a deterioration in the economic conditions of the concession holder [50], and sets out the extent of the public service obligations imposed, the lack of financial compensation for companies competing with the joint concession holders, the discretionary power of the Corsican Transport Board regarding exceptions to the specific regulations of the call for tenders and specifications, the obligation to operate vessels put into service after 1 January 1987; the oversizing of the public service for maritime services, the absence of allotment between the basic service and the additional service and the interpretation of the specific regulations of the call for tenders concerning the tendering of a bid involving unnamed vessels.
Navaja klavzulo, ki preprečuje poslabšanje gospodarskih pogojev pooblaščenega izvajalca [50], določa obseg naloženih obveznosti gospodarske javne službe, odsotnost finančnih nadomestil v korist družb, ki konkurirajo pooblaščenima soizvajalcema, diskrecijsko pravico OTC v zvezi z odstopanji od posebnega pravilnika o javnih razpisih in od pogodbenih pogojev, obveznost uporabe ladij, ki so se začele uporabljati po 1. januarju 1987, prevelik obseg opravljanja javnih storitev ladijskih povezav, odsotnost ločevanja osnovnih storitev in dodatnih storitev ter razlago posebnega pravilnika o javnih razpisih glede predložitve ponudbe za neimenovane ladje.
In addition, Corsica Ferries notes that the award procedure under the public service delegation did not lead to the cheapest bid being accepted.
Poleg tega družba Corsica Ferries poudarja, da s postopkom PPJS ni bila zagotovljena izbira najcenejše ponudbe.
The bid from the SNCM/CMN group led to payment of a subsidy amounting to EUR 15 million more per year than would have resulted from a combination with the bid from Corsica Ferries.
Na podlagi ponudbe skupine SNCM in CMN bi bila izplačana subvencija, ki bi presegala 15 milijonov EUR na leto, kar bi bilo primerljivo s ponudbo družbe Corsica Ferries.
Accordingly, Corsica Ferries stresses that the level of compensation should have been determined by reference to a medium-sized, well run undertaking adequately equipped with the necessary resources.
Zato družba Corsica Ferries poudarja, da bi morala biti višina nadomestila določena na podlagi primerjave s povprečnim dobro vodenim podjetjem, ki razpolaga z ustreznimi viri.
As it feels that it meets those conditions, the company further considers that it would have been able to operate sailings to the ports of Ajaccio, Propriano and Porto Vecchio at a cost less than half that proposed by the SNCM/CMN group.
Ocenjuje, da temu referenčnemu okviru ustreza in da bi poleg tega lahko zagotavljala prevoz do pristanišč v Ajacciu, Proprianu in Porto-Vecchiu po ceni, ki bi bila več kot polovico nižja od cene, ki jo ponuja skupina SNCM-CMN.
REMARKS ON THE SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SYSTEM
UGOTOVITVE GLEDE MEHANIZMA SOCIALNE PODPORE
Corsica Ferries emphasises that the social assistance system would have the advantage of providing reimbursement only for trips actually made by eligible passengers, unlike the public service delegation, which subsidises transport capacity.
Družba Corsica Ferries poudarja, da bi mehanizem socialne podpore predstavljal prednost, pri kateri bi se povračilo izplačalo samo za prevoze, ki so jih upravičeni potniki dejansko opravili, za razliko od PPJS, pri katerem se financira zmogljivost prevoza.
This social assistance system would make it possible to finance the public service obligations at a substantially lower cost than under the public service delegation system.
Ta mehanizem socialne podpore bi omogočal financiranje obveznosti gospodarske javne službe po ceni, ki bi bila bistveno nižja od cene, ki jo predvideva sistem PPJS.
OBSERVATIONS FROM SNCM AND CMN
PRIPOMBE SNCM IN CMN
SNCM and CMN consider first and foremost that the public service delegation contract does not distinguish between a basic service and an additional service.
SNCM in CMN najprej menita, da pogodba o PPJS ne ločuje med osnovnimi storitvami in dodatnimi storitvami.
Like the French authorities, they consider that the public service delegation contract defines two programme seasons corresponding to different volumes of offerings according to peak periods.
Enako kot francoski organi menita, da pogodba o PPJS določa dve programski sezoni glede na število različnih ponudb, ki sta posledica obdobij velikega povpraševanja.
For SNCM it is not a matter of debate that the community should bear the fixed costs imposed upon concession holders throughout the year to meet the specific needs of the concession.
SNCM trdi, da ne bi bilo sporno, če bi skupnost prevzela stalne stroške, ki jih morajo vse leto plačevati pooblaščeni izvajalci, da izpolnijo dejanske potrebe na podlagi prenosa pooblastil.
In this context SNCM points to the broad discretion of Member States with regard to determining the scope of an SGEI, which the Commission may question only in the event of a manifest error of assessment.
V tem smislu SNCM opozarja, da imajo države članice široko diskrecijsko pravico na področju SSGP, ki je lahko predmet ponovne obravnave s strani Komisije samo v primeru očitne napake pri presoji.
Here, in terms of the burden of proof, it believes that it would be excessive to require the Member State concerned to prove that the regular services as provided in a situation of free competition do not meet the needs defined for the public service.
V zvezi s tem meni, da bi bilo, kar zadeva dokazno breme, od zadevne države članice pretirano zahtevati, da dokaže, da redne prevozne storitve, zagotovljene v razmerah svobodne konkurence, ne izpolnjujejo potreb, opredeljenih kot javne storitve.
Furthermore, SNCM denies that Article 4 of Regulation 3577/92 implies that the criterion of a real public service need linked to a shortage of private initiative is a general rule applicable in this case.
SNCM prav tako meni, da iz člena 4 Uredbe št. 3577/92 ne izhaja, da je merilo dejanskih potreb za opravljanje javnih storitev, povezano s pomanjkanjem zasebnih pobud, splošno pravilo, ki velja za obravnavano zadevo.
It considers that the interpretation of the Court of Justice in the Analir judgment [51] does not generally subject the ability of Member States to define the scale of public service remits to this condition.
Meni, da razlaga tega merila, ki jo je navedlo Sodišče v sodbi Analir [51], na splošno sposobnosti držav članic pri določanju obsega nalog javne službe ne pogojuje z izpolnjevanjem tega merila.
SNCM and CMN also share the opinion of the French authorities according to which, if the Commission does not accept this interpretation, the real public service need linked to a shortage of private initiative should be assessed overall for the entire period of validity of the contract.
SNCM in CMN v skladu s stališčem francoskih organov prav tako ocenjujeta, da je treba potrebo po opravljanju javnih storitev v zvezi s pomanjkanjem zasebne pobude presojati celovito za celotno obdobje izvajanja pogodbe, če Komisija te razlage ne bi sprejela.
This overall assessment would thus make it possible to alleviate the public service burden by compensating with income from the high season.
Ta celovita presoja bi tako omogočila, da se zmanjša breme opravljanja javnih storitev z nadomestilom v obliki prihodkov v visoki sezoni.
It would therefore be crucial to assess whether the private operator has the capacity to meet the requirements of regularity, continuity and frequency of service throughout the year.
Odločilna bi bila torej presoja, ali je zasebni izvajalec zmožen izpolniti zahteve glede rednosti, neprekinjenosti in pogostosti storitev vse leto.
CMN also believes that the basic service is inseparable from the additional service.
CMN prav tako ocenjuje, da so osnovne storitve neločljivo povezane z dodatnimi storitvami.
In this context, SNCM notes that the specifications of the public service delegation do not require the use of different vessels for the permanent and the additional service.
V tem smislu SNCM trdi, da pogodbeni pogoji PPJS ne zahtevajo, da se za stalne storitve uporabljajo druge ladje kot za dodatne storitve.
It also considers that the comparison of traffic on the Marseille-Corsica and Toulon-Corsica routes is insufficient to establish a manifest error of assessment as regards the evaluation of the ability of private providers to respond to the need defined by the public service obligations.
Poleg tega ocenjuje, da primerjava prometa na linijah Marseille-Korzika in Toulon-Korzika ne zadošča za ugotovitev očitne napake pri presoji glede ocenjevanja zmogljivosti zasebne ponudbe, ki bi zadostila potrebam, določenim z obveznostmi javnih služb.
Furthermore, it concurs with the opinion of the French authorities that the reduction in the overall traffic carried by the joint concession holders during the period 2004-2005 is related to the interruption in SNCM's service due to industrial action.
Poleg tega naj bi bilo po mnenju francoskih organov zmanjšanje skupnega prometa, ki sta ga v letih 2004–2005 ustvarila pooblaščena soizvajalca, povezano s prekinitvijo storitev SNCM zaradi stavk.
Contrary to the claims of the French authorities, which moreover were not backed up by figures, this trend does not seem to be due to an effect of absorption of demand from Italy.
V nasprotju s trditvami francoskih organov, ki poleg tega niso količinsko utemeljene, se zdi, da ta razvoj ni posledica učinka „medsebojne povezanosti“ s položajem v Italiji.
Regarding the possibility of oversizing of the service offering under the public service delegation contract, SNCM believes that the reference period does not include the years 2004 and 2005 because of the aforementioned industrial action.
Glede možnega pojava prekomernega obsega ponudbe storitev iz pogodbe o PPJS SNCM meni, da referenčno obdobje ne bi smelo vključevati let 2004 in 2005 zaradi zgoraj navedenih stavk.
Car ferries are therefore needed to absorb the high season traffic.
Za zadostitev potrebam po prometu v visoki sezoni bi bila torej potrebna uporaba trajektov.
CMN also states that the size of the bid was based on the economic environment, service disruptions and the directionality of high season traffic which result in low loading coefficients.
CMN prav tako poudarja, da bi bilo oblikovanje ponudbe odvisno od gospodarskega okolja, motenj v storitvah ali celo usmerjenosti prometa v visoki sezoni, zaradi česar morda ladje ob izplutju ne bi bile vedno popolnoma obremenjene.
SNCM and CMN note, moreover, that the services offered by Corsica Ferries from Toulon are not subject to the same obligations as those imposed upon the joint concession holders under the public service delegation contract.
Poleg tega SNCM in CMN ugotavljata, da za storitve, ki jih ponuja družba Corsica Ferries pri linijah iz Toulona, ne veljajo enake obveznosti kot za storitve pooblaščenih soizvajalcev v skladu s pogodbo o PPJS.
In the freight sector, SNCM and CMN highlight the obligations concerning timetables, payload capacity and fare costs with which they have to comply.
Na področju tovornega prometa SNCM in CMN poudarjata obveznosti glede voznih redov, nosilnosti in tarif, ki jih morata upoštevati.
In the area of passenger transport, SNCM believes that time constraints limit the number of rotations, that the looser fare constraints to which Corsica Ferries is subject afford it greater commercial freedom and that quality of service requirements push up the costs borne by the joint concession holders.
Kar zadeva prevoz potnikov, SNCM meni, da omejitve voznih redov omejujejo število plovb, da bi manjše tarifne omejitve družbi Corsica Ferries zagotovile večjo gospodarsko svobodo in da bi zahteve po kakovosti storitve povzročile dvig cen pooblaščenih soizvajalcev.
Similarly, SNCM mentions the specific nature of the departmental destinations included in the specifications and the obligations concerning daily rotations, as mentioned by Corsica Ferries.
Poleg tega SNCM navaja posebne značilnosti destinacij v departmajih, ki so vključene v pogodbene pogoje, in obveznosti vsakodnevnih plovb, ki jih navaja družba Corsica Ferries.
In the alternative, SNCM underlines that the subsidies from which other market players have benefited, particularly those concerning social assistance, could play a role in the development of traffic.
Podredno SNCM poudarja, da bi bile lahko subvencije, ki bi jih pridobili drugi udeleženci na trgu, in zlasti socialna podpora, dejavnik pri razvoju prometa.