natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The ACC3 shall have a procedure to ensure that EU/EEA bound HRCM is identified and subject to appropriate controls as defined in the Union legislation.
ACC3 ima na voljo postopek, s katerim se zagotavlja, da se tovor in pošta z visokim tveganjem, namenjena v EU/EGP, ugotovita in ustrezno nadzorujeta, kakor je opredeljeno v zakonodaji Unije.
The ACC3 shall remain in contact with the appropriate authority responsible for the EU/EEA airports to which it carries cargo in order to have available the latest state of information on high risk origins.
ACC3 ohrani stike s pristojnim organom, odgovornim za letališča EU/EGP, na katere prevaža tovor, da bi imel na voljo najnovejše podatke o izhodiščnih točkah z visokim tveganjem.
The ACC3 shall apply the same measures, irrespective of whether it receives high risk cargo and mail from another air carrier or through other modes of transportation.
ACC3 uporabi enake ukrepe, ne glede na to, ali prejme tovor in pošto z visokim tveganjem od drugega letalskega prevoznika ali z drugimi vrstami prevoza.
Reference: Points 6.7 and 6.8.3.4
Sklic: točki 6.7 in 6.8.3.4
Note: HRCM cleared for carriage into the EU/EEA shall be issued the security status ‘SHR’, meaning secure for passenger, all-cargo and all-mail aircraft in accordance with high risk requirements.
Opomba: Za tovor ali pošto z visokim tveganjem, za katero je bilo odobreno, da se lahko prevaža v EU/EGP, se izda varnostni status ‚SHR‘, kar pomeni varno za potniško, tovorno in poštno letalo v skladu z zahtevami v zvezi z visokim tveganjem.
Does the air carrier staff responsible for performing security controls know which air cargo and mail is to be treated as high risk cargo and mail (HRCM)?
Ali osebje letalskega prevoznika, odgovorno za izvajanje varnostnega nadzora, ve, kateri letalski tovor in pošto je treba obravnavati kot tovor in pošto z visokim tveganjem (HRCM)?
Does the air carrier have procedures in place for the identification of HRCM?
Ali ima letalski prevoznik na voljo postopke za identifikacijo tovora in pošte z visokim tveganjem?
Is HRCM subject to HRCM screening procedures according to EU legislation?
Ali za tovor in pošto z visokim tveganjem veljajo postopki varnostnega pregleda za tovor in pošto z visokim tveganjem v skladu z zakonodajo EU?
If NO, indicate procedures applied
Če je odgovor nikalen, navedite postopke, ki se uporabljajo.
After screening, does the air carrier issue a security status declaration for SHR in the documentation accompanying the consignment?
Ali letalski prevoznik po varnostnem pregledu izda izjavo o varnostnem statusu za SHR v dokumentaciji, ki je priložena k pošiljki?
If YES, describe how security status is issued and in which document
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, opišite, kako se izda varnostni status in v katerem dokumentu.
Conclusion: Is the process put in place by the air carrier relevant and sufficient to ensure that all HRCM has been properly treated before loading?
Zaključek: Ali je letalski prevoznik poskrbel za ustrezen in zadosten postopek, s katerim se zagotovi, da se ves tovor in pošta z visokim tveganjem pred natovarjanjem pravilno obravnavata?
Comments from EU aviation security validator
Pripombe potrjevalca ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU
Objective: The ACC3 shall have processes in place to ensure EU/EEA bound air cargo and/or air mail is protected from unauthorised interference from the point security screening or other security controls are applied or from the point of acceptance after screening or security controls have been applied, until loading.
Cilj: ACC3 ima na voljo postopke, s katerimi zagotavlja, da je letalski tovor in/ali letalska pošta, namenjena v EU/EGP, zavarovana pred nepooblaščenimi posegi od trenutka, ko je bil opravljen varnostni pregled ali drugi varnostni nadzor, ali od trenutka prevzema po varnostnem pregledu ali varnostnem nadzoru do natovarjanja.
Protection can be provided by different means such as physical (barriers, locked rooms, etc.), human (patrols, trained staff, etc.) and technological (CCTV, intrusion alarm, etc.).
Varovanje se lahko zagotavlja z različnimi sredstvi, kot so fizična sredstva (pregrade, zaklenjeni prostori itd.), ljudje (patrulje, usposobljeno osebje itd.) in tehnološka sredstva (video nadzor, alarm ob vdoru itd.).
EU/EAA bound secured air cargo or mail should be separated from air cargo or mail which is not secured.
Varovan letalski tovor ali pošta, namenjena v EU/EGP, bi morala biti ločena od letalskega tovora ali pošte, ki ni varovana.
Is protection of secured air cargo and air mail applied by the air carrier or on its behalf by an entity covered under the air carrier’s security programme?
Ali je letalski prevoznik ali v njegovem imenu subjekt, ki je določen v programu varovanja letalskega prevoznika, zagotovil varovanje za varovan letalski tovor in letalsko pošto?
If NO, which entities not covered by the air carrier’s security programme apply protection measures to secured air cargo or mail carried by this air carrier into the EU/EEA?
Če je odgovor nikalen, kateri subjekti, ki niso vključeni v program varovanja letalskega prevoznika, izvajajo ukrepe varovanja za varovan letalski tovor ali pošto, ki jo ta letalski prevoznik prevaža v EU/EGP?
Are security controls and protection in place to prevent tampering during the screening process?
Ali sta na voljo varnostni nadzor in varovanje, da se preprečijo nedovoljeni posegi med postopkom varnostnega pregleda?
Are there processes in place to ensure EU/EEA bound air cargo/air mail to which security controls have been applied are protected from unauthorised interference from the time it has been secured until its loading?
Ali so na voljo postopki, ki zagotavljajo, da je letalski tovor/letalska pošta, ki je namenjena v EU/EGP in na kateri je bil opravljen varnostni nadzor, zavarovana pred nepooblaščenimi posegi od trenutka, ko je bila zavarovana, do natovarjanja?
If YES, describe how it is protected
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, opišite, kako je zavarovana.
Conclusions: Is the protection of consignments sufficiently robust to prevent unlawful interference?
Zaključek: Ali je varovanje dovolj skrbno, da se preprečijo nepooblaščeni posegi?
If NO specify reason
Če je odgovor nikalen, navedite razlog.
Accompanying documentation
Spremna dokumentacija
Objective: The ACC3 shall ensure that:
Cilj: ACC3 zagotovi, da je:
the security status of the consignment is indicated in the accompanying documentation, either in the form of an air waybill, equivalent postal documentation or in a separate declaration and either in an electronic format or in writing; and
varnostni status pošiljke naveden v priloženi dokumentaciji v obliki letalskega tovornega lista, enakovredne poštne dokumentacije ali ločene izjave, in sicer v elektronski ali pisni obliki, in
its unique alphanumeric identifier appears on documentation accompanying the consignments carried, either in electronic format or in writing.
enotna črkovno-številčna oznaka navedena na dokumentaciji, priloženi k pošiljki, ki se prevaža, v elektronski ali pisni obliki.
Reference: Points 6.3.2.6 (d), 6.8.3.4 and 6.8.3.5
Sklic: točke 6.3.2.6(d), 6.8.3.4 in 6.8.3.5
Note: the following security statuses may be indicated:
Opomba: navedejo se lahko naslednji varnostni statusi:
‘SPX’, meaning secure for passenger, all-cargo and all-mail aircraft, or
‚SPX‘, kar pomeni varno za potniško, tovorno in poštno letalo, ali
‘SCO’, meaning secure for all-cargo and all-mail aircraft only, or
‚SCO‘, kar pomeni varno le za tovorno in poštno letalo, ali
‘SHR’, meaning secure for passenger, all-cargo and all-mail aircraft in accordance with high risk requirements.
‚SHR‘, kar pomeni varno za potniško, tovorno in poštno letalo v skladu z zahtevami za visoko tveganje.
In the absence of a regulated agent, the ACC3 or an air carrier arriving from a third country exempted from the ACC3 regime may issue the security status declaration.
V odsotnosti reguliranega agenta lahko izjavo o varnostnem statusu izda ACC3 ali letalski prevoznik, ki prihaja iz tretje države, izvzete iz režima ACC3.
Are consignments accompanied by documentation that confirms previous and current security controls?
Ali je pošiljkam priložena dokumentacija, ki potrjuje prejšnji in sedanji varnostni nadzor?
If YES, describe the content of the documentation
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, opišite vsebino dokumentacije.
If NO, explain why and how the cargo or mail is treated as ‘secure’ by the air carrier if it is loaded onto an aircraft
Če je odgovor nikalen, razložite zakaj in kako letalski prevoznik obravnava tovor ali pošto kot ‚varno‘, če se natovarja na zrakoplov.
Does the documentation include the air carrier’s ACC3 unique alphanumeric identifier?
Ali dokumentacija vsebuje enotno črkovno-številčno oznako ACC3 letalskega prevoznika?
Does the documentation specify the security status of the cargo and how this status was achieved?
Ali je v dokumentaciji naveden varnostni status tovora in kako je bil ta status dosežen?
Conclusion: Is the documentation process sufficient to ensure that cargo or mail is provided with proper accompanying documentation which specifies the correct security status?
Zaključek: Ali dokumentacijski postopek primerno zagotavlja, da sta tovor in pošta opremljena z ustrezno spremno dokumentacijo, v kateri je naveden pravilen varnostni status?
Objective: After assessing the ten previous parts of this checklist, the EU aviation security validator has to conclude if its on-site verification corresponds with the content of the part of the air carrier security programme describing the measures for the EU/EAA bound air cargo/ air mail and if the security controls sufficiently implements the objectives listed in this checklist.
Cilj: Ko je potrjevalec ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU ocenil prejšnjih deset delov tega kontrolnega seznama, mora ugotoviti, ali njegovo preverjanje na kraju samem ustreza vsebini dela programa varovanja letalskega prevoznika, ki opisuje ukrepe za letalski tovor/letalsko pošto, namenjeno v EU/EGP, in ali varnostni nadzor v zadostni meri izpolnjuje cilje, ki so navedeni v tem kontrolnem seznamu.
For your conclusions distinguish between four possible main cases:
Pri svojih ugotovitvah razlikujte med štirimi najpomembnejšimi možnimi primeri:
the air carrier security programme is in compliance with Attachment 6-G set out in the Annex to of Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 and the on-site verification confirms compliance with the objective of the checklist; or
program varovanja letalskega prevoznika je skladen z Dodatkom 6-G iz Priloge k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010 in preverjanje na kraju samem potrjuje skladnost s ciljem kontrolnega seznama ali
the air carrier security programme is in compliance with Attachment 6-G set out in the Annex to of Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 but the on-site verification does not confirm compliance with the objective of the checklist; or
program varovanja letalskega prevoznika je skladen z Dodatkom 6-G iz Priloge k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010, vendar preverjanje na kraju samem ne potrjuje skladnosti s ciljem kontrolnega seznama, ali
the air carrier security programme is not in compliance with Attachment 6-G set out in the Annex to of Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 but the on-site verification confirms compliance with the objective of the checklist; or
program varovanja letalskega prevoznika ni skladen z Dodatkom 6-G iz Priloge k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010, vendar preverjanje na kraju samem potrjuje skladnost s ciljem kontrolnega seznama, ali
the air carrier security programme is not in compliance with Attachment 6-G set out in the Annex to of Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 and the on-site verification does not confirm compliance with the objective of the checklist.
program varovanja letalskega prevoznika ni skladen z Dodatkom 6-G iz Priloge k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010 in preverjanje na kraju samem ne potrjuje skladnosti s ciljem kontrolnega seznama.
General conclusion: Indicate the case closest to the situation validated
Splošni zaključek: Navedite primer, ki je najbližji potrjenemu stanju.
Name of the validator:
Ime potrjevalca:
List of persons and entities visited and interviewed
Seznam oseb in subjektov, ki so bili obiskani in s katerimi so bili opravljeni intervjuji
Providing the name of the entity, the name of the contact person and the date of the visit or interview.
Navedite ime subjekta, ime kontaktne osebe in datum obiska ali intervjujev.
D. Attachment 6-F is replaced by the following:
D. Dodatek 6-F se nadomesti z naslednjim:
THIRD COUNTRIES, AS WELL AS OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WITH SPECIAL RELATIONS TO THE UNION ACCORDING TO THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TO WHICH THE TRANSPORT TITLE OF THAT TREATY DOES NOT APPLY, RECOGNISED AS APPLYING SECURITY STANDARDS EQUIVALENT TO THE COMMON BASIC STANDARDS
TRETJE DRŽAVE TER ČEZMORSKE DRŽAVE IN OZEMLJA, KI SO V SKLADU S POGODBO O DELOVANJU EVROPSKE UNIJE V POSEBNIH ODNOSIH Z UNIJO IN ZA KATERE SE POGLAVJE O PROMETU IZ NAVEDENE POGODBE NE UPORABLJA TER ZA KATERE JE PRIZNANO, DA SE V NJIH UPORABLJAJO VARNOSTNI STANDARDI, ENAKOVREDNI SKUPNIM OSNOVNIM STANDARDOM
THIRD COUNTRIES, AS WELL AS OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WITH SPECIAL RELATIONS TO THE UNION ACCORDING TO THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TO WHICH THE TRANSPORT TITLE OF THAT TREATY DOES NOT APPLY, FOR WHICH ACC3 DESIGNATION IS NOT REQUIRED
TRETJE DRŽAVE TER ČEZMORSKE DRŽAVE IN OZEMLJA, KI SO V SKLADU S POGODBO O DELOVANJU EVROPSKE UNIJE V POSEBNIH ODNOSIH Z UNIJO IN ZA KATERE SE POGLAVJE O PROMETU IZ NAVEDENE POGODBE NE UPORABLJA TER ZA KATERE IMENOVANJE ACC3 NI POTREBNO
Third countries as well as countries and territories with special relations to the Union according to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or the Treaty on the European Union for which ACC3 designation is not required are listed in a separate Commission Decision.
Tretje države ter države in ozemlja, ki so v skladu s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije ali Pogodbo o Evropski uniji v posebnih odnosih z Unijo, za katere imenovanje ACC3 ni potrebno, so navedeni v ločenem sklepu Komisije.
VALIDATION ACTIVITIES OF THIRD COUNTRIES AS WELL AS OVERSEAS COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WITH SPECIAL RELATIONS TO THE UNION ACCORDING TO THE TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TO WHICH THE TRANSPORT CHAPTER OF THAT TREATY DOES NOT APPLY, RECOGNISED AS EQUIVALENT TO EU AVIATION SECURITY VALIDATION’.
DEJAVNOSTI POTRJEVANJA TRETJIH DRŽAV TER ČEZMORSKIH DRŽAV IN OZEMELJ, KI SO V SKLADU S POGODBO O DELOVANJU EVROPSKE UNIJE V POSEBNIH ODNOSIH Z UNIJO IN ZA KATERE SE POGLAVJE O PROMETU IZ NAVEDENE POGODBE NE UPORABLJA, KI SO PRIZNANE KOT ENAKOVREDNE POTRJEVANJU UKREPOV VAROVANJA V LETALSTVU EU“.
E. The following Attachment is inserted after Attachment 6-H
E. Za Dodatkom 6-H se vstavi naslednji dodatek:
‘ATTACHMENT 6-H1
„DODATEK 6-H1
DECLARATION OF COMMITMENTS — EU AVIATION SECURITY VALIDATED ACC3
IZJAVA O OBVEZNOSTIH – ACC3, KI JE POTRJEN ZA UKREPE VAROVANJA V LETALSTVU EU
On behalf of [name of air carrier] I take note of the following:
V imenu [ime letalskega prevoznika] upoštevam naslednje:
This report establishes the level of security applied to EU/EEA bound air cargo operations in respect of the security standards listed in the checklist or referred to therein.
To poročilo ugotavlja raven varovanja, ki se uporablja za letalske tovorne operacije, namenjene v EU/EGP, v zvezi z varnostnimi standardi, ki so navedeni v kontrolnem seznamu ali se nanj sklicujejo.
[Name of air carrier] can only be designated “Air Cargo or Mail carrier operating into the Union from a Third Country Airport” (ACC3) once an EU validation report has been submitted to and accepted by the appropriate authority of a Member State of the European Union or Iceland, Norway or Switzerland for that purpose, and the details of the ACC3 have been entered in the Union database for the regulated agents and known consignors.
[Ime letalskega prevoznika] je lahko imenovan za ‚prevoznika letalskega tovora ali pošte, ki opravlja operacije v Unijo z letališča tretje države‘ (ACC3) šele takrat, ko je bilo poročilo EU o potrjevanju predloženo pristojnemu organu države članice Evropske unije ali Islandije, Norveške ali Švice in ga je ta organ sprejel za navedeni namen ter ko so bili podatki o ACC3 vpisani v bazo podatkov Unije o reguliranih agentih in znanih pošiljateljih.
If the report establishes a non-compliance in the security measures it refers to, this could lead to the withdrawal of [name of air carrier] designation as an ACC3 already obtained for this airport which will prevent [name of air carrier] transport air cargo or mail into the EU/EEA area for this airport.
Če je v poročilu ugotovljena neskladnost pri ukrepih varovanja, na katere se sklicuje, lahko to privede do odvzema imenovanja [ime letalskega prevoznika] za ACC3, ki je bilo že izdano za to letališče, kar bo [ime letalskega prevoznika] preprečilo prevoz letalskega tovora ali pošte na območje EU/EGP za to letališče.
The report is valid for five years and will therefore expire on _ at the latest.
To poročilo velja pet let in bo prenehalo veljati najpozneje._
On behalf of [name of air carrier] I declare that:
V imenu [ime letalskega prevoznika] izjavljam, da:
[name of air carrier] will accept appropriate follow-up action for the purpose of monitoring the standards confirmed by the report.
[Ime letalskega prevoznika] bo sprejel ustrezne nadaljnje ukrepe za spremljanje standardov, ki so potrjeni v poročilu.
Any changes to [name of air carrier] operations not requiring full re-validation will be noted on the original report by adding the information while keeping the previous information visible.
Vse spremembe operacij [ime letalskega prevoznika], za katere ni potrebno celotno ponovno potrjevanje, bodo navedene v prvotnem poročilu tako, da bodo dodani podatki, hkrati pa bodo razvidne prejšnje informacije.
This may concern the following changes:
To se lahko nanaša na naslednje spremembe:
the overall responsibility for security is assigned to anyone other than the person named in point 1.7 of Attachment 6-C3 to Regulation (EU) No 185/2010;
celotna odgovornost za varovanje je dodeljena komur koli, razen osebi, ki je imenovana v točki 1.7 Dodatka 6-C3 k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010;
any other changes to premises or procedures likely to significantly impact on security;
vse druge spremembe poslovnih prostorov ali postopkov, ki lahko bistveno vplivajo na varovanje.
[name of air carrier] will inform the authority that designated it as ACC3 if [name of air carrier] ceases trading, no longer deals with air cargo/air mail or can no longer meet the requirements validated in this report.
[Ime letalskega prevoznika] bo obvestil organ, ki ga je imenoval za ACC3, če [ime letalskega prevoznika] preneha poslovati, se ne ukvarja več z letalskim tovorom/letalsko pošto ali ne more več izpolnjevati zahtev, ki so potrjene v tem poročilu.
[name of air carrier] will maintain the security level confirmed in this report as compliant with the objective set out in the checklist and, where appropriate, implement and apply any additional security measures required to be designated ACC3 where security standards were identified as insufficient, until the subsequent validation of [name of air carrier’s] activities.
[Ime letalskega prevoznika] bo ohranil raven varovanja, ki je v tem poročilu potrjena kot skladna s ciljem iz kontrolnega seznama, ter po potrebi do naslednjega potrjevanja dejavnosti [ime letalskega prevoznika] izvajal in uporabljal vse dodatne ukrepe varovanja, ki se zahtevajo za ACC3, pri katerem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so varnostni standardi nezadostni.
On behalf of [name of air carrier] I accept full responsibility for this declaration.
V imenu [ime letalskega prevoznika] prevzemam polno odgovornost za to izjavo.
F. In point 8.1.3.2(b) ‘an independent validator’ is replaced by ‘an EU aviation security validator’.
F. V točki 8.1.3.2(b) se „neodvisni potrjevalec“ nadomesti s „potrjevalec ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU“.
G. In chapter 11, Point 11.0.5 is deleted.
G. V poglavju 11 se črta točka 11.0.5.
H. In chapter 11, Sections 11.5 and 11.6 are replaced by the following:
H. V poglavju 11 se oddelka 11.5 in 11.6 nadomestita z naslednjim:
QUALIFICATION OF INSTRUCTORS
USPOSOBLJENOST INŠTRUKTORJEV
The appropriate authority shall maintain or have access to lists of certified instructors who have met the requirements set out in point 11.5.2 or 11.5.3.
Pristojni organ vodi sezname certificiranih inštruktorjev, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve iz točke 11.5.2 ali 11.5.3, ali ima dostop do teh seznamov.
Instructors shall have successfully completed a background check in accordance with point 11.1.3 and produce evidence of relevant qualifications or knowledge.
Inštruktorji morajo uspešno opraviti preverjanje ozadja v skladu s točko 11.1.3 in predložiti dokazilo o ustreznih kvalifikacijah ali znanju.
Instructors who were recruited or who were providing training specified in this Regulation before it came into force shall, as a minimum, satisfy the appropriate authority that they:
Inštruktorji, ki so bili zaposleni ali so izvajali usposabljanje, določeno v tej uredbi, pred začetkom njene veljavnosti, prepričajo pristojni organ vsaj, da:
have knowledge and competencies as specified in point 11.5.5; and
imajo znanje in sposobnosti iz točke 11.5.5 in
are delivering only courses approved by the appropriate authority in accordance with point 11.2.1.3.
izvajajo izključno tečaje, ki jih je odobril pristojni organ v skladu s točko 11.2.1.3.
In order to be certified as an instructor qualified to give training defined in points 11.2.3.1 to 11.2.3.5 and in points 11.2.4 and 11.2.5, a person shall have knowledge of the work environment in the relevant aviation security field and qualifications and competencies in the following areas:
Za pridobitev certifikata za inštruktorja, kvalificiranega za izvajanje usposabljanja, opredeljenega v točkah 11.2.3.1 do 11.2.3.5 ter v točkah 11.2.4 in 11.2.5, oseba pozna delovno okolje na ustreznem področju varovanja letalstva ter ima kvalifikacije in sposobnosti na naslednjih področjih:
instructional techniques; and
tehnike poučevanja in
security elements to be taught.
elementi varovanja, ki jih je treba poučevati.
The appropriate authority shall either itself provide training for instructors or approve and maintain a list of appropriate security training courses.
Pristojni organ izvaja usposabljanje za inštruktorje sam ali odobri ustrezne tečaje usposabljanja na področju varovanja in vodi seznam teh tečajev.
The appropriate authority shall ensure that instructors receive regular training or information on developments in the relevant fields.
Pristojni organ poskrbi, da so inštruktorji deležni rednega usposabljanja ali redno prejemajo informacije o dosežkih na ustreznih področjih.
If the appropriate authority is no longer satisfied that training delivered by a qualified instructor is resulting in the relevant competencies, it shall either withdraw approval of the course or ensure that the trainer is suspended or removed from the list of qualified instructors, as appropriate.
Kadar pristojni organ ni več mnenja, da usposabljanje, ki ga izvaja kvalificirani inštruktor, zagotavlja ustrezno usposobljenost, prekliče odobritev tečaja ali poskrbi, da je vodja usposabljanja suspendiran ali odstranjen s seznama kvalificiranih inštruktorjev.
EU AVIATION SECURITY VALIDATION
POTRJEVANJE UKREPOV VAROVANJA V LETALSTVU EU
EU aviation security validation is a standardised, documented, impartial and objective process for obtaining and evaluating evidence to determine the level of compliance of the validated entity with requirements set out in regulation (EC) No 300/2008 and its implementing acts.
Potrjevanje ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU je standardiziran, dokumentiran, nepristranski in objektiven postopek za pridobivanje in ocenjevanje dokazil za določanje ravni skladnosti potrjenega subjekta z zahtevami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 in njenih izvedbenih aktov.
EU aviation security validation
Potrjevanje ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU
may be a requirement for obtaining or maintaining a legal status under Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 and its implementing acts;
je lahko zahteva za pridobitev ali ohranitev pravnega statusa v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 300/2008 in njenimi izvedbenimi akti;