natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
reminds the Commission, however, that the current error rate is still unacceptably high and that Parliament has a zero-tolerance approach to errors;
kljub vsemu opominja Komisijo, da je trenutna stopnja napak še vedno previsoka in da ima Parlament do njih držo ničelne tolerance;
Highlights the fact that an error rate as such does not give a comprehensive view of the effectiveness of Union policies;
poudarja tudi dejstvo, da stopnja napake ne ponuja celovitega pregleda nad učinkovitostjo politik Unije;
is of the opinion, therefore, that compliance audits should be supplemented by performance audits evaluating the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of Union policy instruments;
zato meni, da bi bilo treba revizije skladnosti dopolniti z revizijami uspešnosti, ki ocenjujejo upravljanje, učinkovitost in uspešnost instrumentov politike Unije;
points to the fact that the U.S. Government Accountability Office concentrates more on performance than on compliance audits;
opozarja na dejstvo, da se vladni urad ZDA za nadzor javne porabe osredotoča bolj na revizije uspešnosti kot na revizije skladnosti;
Observes that there are some differences of views between the Court of Auditors and the Commission with regard to the way in which errors should be calculated, in particular as to whether pre-financing should be included or excluded, as to the handling of quantifiable and non-quantifiable errors and as to the way in which recoveries and financial corrections should be considered in the overall assessment of the financial impact of errors and the corrective capacity of systems;
ugotavlja, da obstajajo nekatere razlike v mnenjih med Računskim sodiščem in Komisijo v zvezi z načinom, kako bi se napake morale izračunavati, zlasti glede tega, ali bi bilo treba predhodno financiranje vključiti ali izvzeti, glede obravnavanja količinsko opredeljivih in količinsko neopredeljivih napak in glede načina, kako bi bilo treba izterjave in finančne popravke upoštevati pri splošni oceni finančnega učinka napak in zmožnosti za popravke v sistemih;
is of the opinion that the different approaches mirror the different roles respectively played by the institutions, namely the role of auditor on the one hand and manager on the other;
meni, da različni pristopi razkrivajo različne vloge, ki jih imajo posamezne institucije, in sicer vlogo revizorja na eni strani in upravitelja na drugi strani;
requests that the Court of Auditors consider the possibility of separating these contested different categories of error rates in its next annual report and to qualify the recovery and financial corrections policies/results per sector;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj razmisli o tem, da bi v naslednjem letnem poročilu ločilo različne kategorije napak, ki so predmet nesoglasja, in opredelilo politike in rezultate izterjave in finančnih popravkov po sektorjih;
Understands that in the course of time, expertise and methodology can change;
se zaveda, da se strokovno znanje in izkušnje ter metodologija s časom lahko spremenijo;
insists, however, that audit results need to remain comparable in order to enable Parliament to make a political assessment over a longer period of time;
vseeno vztraja pri tem, da morajo ostati rezultati revizij primerljivi, da lahko Parlament v daljšem obdobju pripravi politično oceno;
Calls, therefore, for closer cooperation between national audit institutions and the European Court of Auditors in connection with the auditing of shared-management arrangements, pursuant to Article 287(3) TFEU;
zato v skladu s členom 287(3) PDEU zahteva, da se za nadzor deljenega upravljanja poudari sodelovanje med nacionalnimi revizijskimi organi in Računskim sodiščem;
The Court of Auditors’ statement of assurance
Izjava Računskega sodišča o zanesljivosti
Accounts – clean opinion
Računovodski izkazi – pozitivno mnenje
Welcomes the fact that the annual accounts of the Union for the financial year 2011 present fairly, and in all material respects, the position of the Union as at 31 December 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the then completed year;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da letni računovodski izkazi Unije za proračunsko leto 2011 v vseh pomembnih vidikih prikazujejo dejanski finančni položaj Unije na dan 31. decembra 2011 ter rezultate poslovnih dogodkov in denarnih tokov v proračunskem letu, ki se je končalo na ta dan;
Legality and regularity of revenue – clean opinion
Zakonitost in pravilnost prihodkov – pozitivno mnenje
Notes with satisfaction that revenue underlying the accounts for the year ended 31 December 2011 is legal and regular in all material respects;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so prihodki, povezani z izkazi za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2011, v vseh pomembnih vidikih zakoniti in pravilni;
Legality and regularity of commitments – clean opinion
Zakonitost in pravilnost obveznosti – pozitivno mnenje
Notes with satisfaction that commitments underlying the accounts for the year ended 31 December 2011 are legal and regular in all material respects;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so obveznosti, povezane z izkazi za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2011, v vseh pomembnih vidikih zakonite in pravilne;
Legality and regularity of payments – adverse opinion
Zakonitost in pravilnost plačil – negativno mnenje
Deeply regrets that payments remain materially affected by error;
globoko obžaluje, da se pri plačilih še vedno pojavljajo pomembne napake;
Understands that the basis for the adverse opinion of the Court of Auditors is the observation that the supervisory and control systems are only partially effective and that, as a result, payments are affected by a most likely error rate of 3,9 %;
je seznanjen s tem, da negativno mnenje Računskega sodišča temelji na ugotovitvi, da so sistemi nadzora in kontrole le delno učinkoviti in da so se pri plačilih zaradi tega pojavljale napake z najverjetnejšo stopnjo 3,9 %;
Recalls that the most likely error rate for payments in the financial year 2010 was estimated at 3,7 % and in the financial year 2009 at 3,3 %;
opozarja, da je bila najverjetnejša stopnja napake za plačila v proračunskem letu 2010 ocenjena na 3,7 % in v proračunskem letu 2009 na 3,3 %;
is dismayed about this increase because it reverses the positive trend observed in the years 2007, 2008 and 2009;
je razočaran zaradi tega povečanja, saj pomeni, da se je pozitivni trend iz let 2007, 2008 in 2009 obrnil;
calls on the Commission, therefore, to take the necessary steps to achieve a trend that shows a consistent decrease in the error rate;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da se vzpostavi trend doslednega zmanjševanja stopnje napak;
emphasises that Parliament is of the opinion that [r]eaching this target is an essential part of getting full value for EU expenditure in the future and progressing towards a positive DAS’ [16];
poudarja, da je po mnenju Parlamenta „[i]zpolnitev tega cilja bistvenega pomena za pridobivanje polne vrednosti odhodkov Unije v prihodnje ter za napredek k pozitivni izjavi o zanesljivosti“ [16];
Attributes this development mainly to the increase of the most likely error rate in the area of agriculture, and is concerned in particular about the high level of error in the rural development where the most likely error rate reported was 7,7 %;
ta razvoj pripisuje predvsem povečanju najverjetnejše stopnje napake na področju kmetijstva, še zlasti pa je zaskrbljen zaradi visoke stopnje napak na področju razvoja podeželja, kjer je najverjetnejša stopnja po poročilih znašala 7,7 %;
Calls on the Court of Auditors to adapt its special reports on specific fields of policy more than previously to facilitating comparisons with past periods;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj svoja posebna poročila še bolj prilagodi posameznim področjem politik, da bo primerjava s preteklimi obdobji lažja;
Council recommendation
Priporočila Sveta
Regrets that the Council continues to refuse to cooperate with Parliament with regards to the Council discharge;
obžaluje, da Svet še vedno ni pripravljen sodelovati s Parlamentom, kar zadeva podelitev razrešnice Svetu;
believes that this leaves the Committee on Budgetary Control with very few instruments and that eventually, the Committee is forced to introduce its questions and requests for information about the budget of the Council to the Commission;
meni, da tako Odboru za proračunski nadzor ostaja na voljo zelo malo možnosti in da bo moral nazadnje vplesti Komisijo in od nje zahtevati podatke o proračunu Sveta;
Notes that the Council recommends to give discharge to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2011;
je seznanjen, da je Svet priporočil podelitev razrešnice Komisiji za izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Unije za proračunsko leto 2011;
notes that the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom have voted against granting discharge to the Commission for the execution of the Union’s budget for the financial year 2011;
ugotavlja, da so Nizozemska, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo glasovali proti podelitvi razrešnice Komisiji za izvrševanje proračuna Unije za proračunsko leto 2011;
takes notice of these countries’ observations:
je seznanjen z naslednjimi ugotovitvami teh držav:
for the 18th consecutive time, the Court of Auditors was unable to grant a positive unqualified statement of assurance,
Računsko sodišče že osemnajstič zapored ni moglo podati pozitivne izjave o zanesljivosti brez pridržka,
emphasising the fact that the credibility of Union spending depends on sound financial management at all levels, orderly accounting and transparent accountability of all relevant actors,
verodostojnost porabe Unije je odvisna od dobrega finančnega poslovodenja na vseh ravneh, pravilnega računovodstva in transparentne odgovornosti vseh udeleženih akterjev,
pointing out that 80 % of the Union budget is spent under the system of shared management by Member States,
80 % proračuna Unije se porabi v sistemu deljenega upravljanja z državami članicami,
regretting that only four out of seven Member States’ audit authorities, assessed by the Court of Auditors, were considered effective,
samo štirje izmed sedmih revizijskih organov držav članic, ki jih je ocenilo Računsko sodišče, so bili učinkoviti,
calling on all Member States to provide full, transparent and accurate data as part of their annual summaries,
poziva vse države članice, naj v svojih letnih povzetkih posredujejo popolne, pregledne in točne podatke,
encouraging the Commission to continue driving better financial management by all Member States, including strict application of sanctions such as suspensions and interruptions;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj se še bolj zavzame za boljše finančno poslovodenje v državah članicah, vključno s strogim izvajanjem kazni, kot so prekinitve in začasne ustavitve plačil;
Notes in this context the high number of the Commission’s reservations concerning the ERDF/CF management and control systems for the period 2007-2013 amongst others in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom;
v zvezi s tem opozarja na zadržke Komisije glede sistemov za upravljanje in nadzor Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskega sklada v obdobju 2007–2013, med drugim na Nizozemskem in v Združenem kraljestvu;
encourages the Council to draw conclusions from the observations by the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom by conducting a peer review of each of the Member States’ financial management and quality of performance;
spodbuja Svet, naj poskrbi za medsebojne preglede finančnega poslovanja in uspešnosti med posameznimi državami članicami ter sprejme zaključke na podlagi ugotovitev Nizozemske, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva;
Responsibilities of the Commission and the Member States in shared management
Odgovornosti Komisije in držav članic v deljenem upravljanju
Emphasises that in accordance with Article 317 TFEU, the Commission is ultimately responsible for the implementation of the Union’s budget;
poudarja, da je v skladu s členom 317 PDEU za izvrševanje proračuna Unije dokončno odgovorna Komisija;
points out that where the Commission implements the budget under shared management, implementation tasks are delegated to Member States pursuant to Article 53b of the Financial Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002;
poudarja, da se, kadar Komisija proračun izvaja z deljenim upravljanjem, naloge izvrševanja prenesejo na države članice v skladu s členom 53(b) finančne uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002;
Stresses that in this respect, the responsibility of the Directors-General is a cornerstone of the Commission’s present system for managing Union funds and emphasises the importance of fairly representing the management performances in their annual activity report;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je odgovornost generalnih direktoratov temelj obstoječega sistema Komisije za upravljanje sredstev Unije, in poudarja pomembnost tega, da v svojih letnih poročilih o dejavnostih jasno predstavijo uspešnost svojega upravljanja;
Recalls Parliament’s proposal, contained in its 2010 discharge resolution, for a full-time Commissioner for Budgetary Control in the 2014-2019 Commission;
opominja, da je Parlament v resoluciji o razrešnici za leto 2010 predlagal, da bi imela Komisija v obdobju 2014–2019 komisarja, izključno pristojnega za proračunski nadzor;
Expects that Member States are fully aware of their obligations, pursuant to Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union and pursuant to the principle of sincere cooperation, to assist in an active and effective way the Union in carrying out tasks which flow from the Treaties;
pričakuje, da se države članice povsem zavedajo svojih obveznosti na podlagi člena 4(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in načela poštenega sodelovanja, namreč da morajo na aktiven in učinkovit način pomagati Uniji pri izvajanju nalog, ki izhajajo iz Pogodb;
Insists in this context on the importance of Article 53b of the Financial Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, which provides that, when implementing the budget, the Member States are to take all necessary measures, including legislative, regulatory and administrative measures, to protect the Union’s financial interests;
v tem smislu vztraja pri pomembnosti člena 53(b) finančne uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, ki zagotavlja, da morajo države članice pri izvrševanju proračuna sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, vključno z zakonodajnimi, regulativnimi in upravnimi ukrepi, da zaščitijo finančne interese Unije;
stresses in this respect that Article 59(2) of the new Financial Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 even specifies that these measures should include the following:(a) ensuring that actions financed from the budget are implemented correctly and effectively and in accordance with the applicable sector-specific rules for that purpose and (b) preventing, detecting and correcting irregularities and fraud;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da člen 59(2) nove finančne uredbe ((EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012) celo določa, da bi ti ukrepi morali vključevati naslednje: (a) zagotavljanje, da se ukrepi, ki se financirajo iz proračuna, izvajajo pravilno in učinkovito ter v skladu z veljavnimi sektorskimi pravili za te namene, ter (b) preprečevanje, odkrivanje in odpravljanje nepravilnosti in goljufij;
Notes that the current system does not ensure a full transparency of the beneficiaries of ERDF/CF support;
ugotavlja, da obstoječi sistem ne omogoča popolne preglednosti upravičencev do podpore iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijskega sklada;
in the current framework, the Commission provides a portal with access to lists of beneficiaries available on national websites, which are only in the respective national language and without following common criteria;
ugotavlja še, da Komisija trenutno na posebnem portalu omogoča vpogled v sezname upravičencev, shranjene na nacionalnih spletnih mestih, ki pa so na voljo samo v jezikih posameznih držav in ne ustrezajo enotnim merilom;
expects the future regulation covering the structural instruments to ensure that Member States provide the data on the final beneficiaries of ERDF/CF funds to be published on the Commission’s official website in one of the three working languages of the Union and based on a set of common criteria to allow comparison and detection of errors;
pričakuje, da bo prihodnja ureditev strukturnih instrumentov določala, da morajo države članice podatke o končnih upravičencih do sredstev omenjenih skladov posredovati v objavo na uradnem spletnem mestu Komisije v enem od treh delovnih jezikov Unije in na podlagi enotnih meril, da se omogoči primerjava in odkrivanje napak;
Points to the existence of significant differences in Member States’ administrative performance in the field of revenue and expenditure in shared management, especially related to detecting irregularities, fraud and errors and financial follow-up in both the customs field and spending of Union funds;
opozarja na precejšnje razlike v upravni uspešnosti držav članic na področju prihodkov in odhodkov v okviru deljenega upravljanja, zlasti pri ugotavljanju nepravilnosti, goljufij in napak ter pri finančnem spremljanju, tako na področju carin kot pri porabi sredstev Unije;
notes that the Commission so far monitors administrative performance in a reactive way and on case level and thus, does not perform sufficient trend analysis to identify fields of risk;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija upravno delovanje doslej spremljala tako, da se je odzivala na spremembe v vsakem primeru posebej, zato ni v zadostni meri analizirala trendov, da bi lahko opredelila področja tveganja;
calls on the Commission to apply the method of trend analysis to identify financial risks and to take measures to improve Member States’ administrative performance;
poziva Komisijo, naj uveljavi metodo analize trendov, da bi opredelila finančna tveganja, ter sprejme ukrepe za izboljšanje upravne uspešnosti držav članic;
Welcomes the fact that, in accordance with Article 59(3), (4) and (5) of the new Financial Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012, Member States management authorities are in future to be required annually to provide the Commission with their accounts accompanied by a management declaration, an annual summary of their final audit report and of controls and an opinion from an independent audit body;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da bodo morali organi za upravljanje držav članic v skladu s členom 59(3), (4) in (5) nove finančne uredbe ((EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012) v prihodnje Komisiji letno posredovati svoje računovodske izkaze skupaj z izjavo o upravljanju, letnim povzetkom svojega končnega revizijskega poročila in kontrol ter mnenjem neodvisnega revizijskega organa;
Is convinced that the above mentioned declarations, in combination with the introduction of self-critical deliberation in the Council, which is lacking until now, and an even-handed and honest and open peer review among Member States would result in better and more effective budget execution, increase the performance of policies, programmes and projects and which will help to reinforce the solidarity between Member-States and replace mutual distrust, a result which is preferable to budget cuts to the detriment of economic recovery and the trust of the Union citizens in a common Europe;
je prepričan, da bi omenjene izjave v kombinaciji s samokritičnim premislekom v Svetu, ki ga je doslej primanjkovalo, in uravnoteženim, poštenim in odprtim medsebojnim pregledom med državami članicami prinesle boljše in učinkovitejše izvrševanje proračuna, izboljšale izvajanje programov, politik in projektov, utrdile solidarnost med državami članicami in pregnale sedanje vzajemno nezaupanje – kar je bolje od zmanjševanja proračunskih sredstev v škodo gospodarskemu okrevanju in zaupanju evropskih državljanov v skupno Evropo;
Welcomes the fact that Member States may, at the appropriate level, publish the above information, and – in addition – provide declarations signed at an appropriate level based on that information;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da lahko države članice na ustrezni ravni objavijo omenjene informacije in poleg tega na podlagi teh informacij zagotovijo izjave, podpisane na ustrezni ravni;
calls on the Commission to assist the Member States in providing those voluntary management declarations as referred to in Article 59(5) of the new Financial Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 by promoting best practices;
poziva Komisijo, naj pomaga državam članicam pri zagotavljanju teh prostovoljnih izjav o upravljanju iz člena 59(5) nove finančne uredbe ((EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012) s spodbujanjem najboljših praks;
insists that Parliament should receive both the management declarations and the voluntary declarations;
vztraja, da bi Parlament moral prejeti izjave o upravljanju in tudi prostovoljne izjave;
Notes that the Commission should give guidance to Member States to draft meaningful annual summaries;
meni, da bi morala Komisija državam članicam svetovati, kako pripraviti koristne letne povzetke;
notes that for this purpose, information given on operational programmes under shared management should be standardised as regards form and content;
ugotavlja, da bi morale biti v ta namen informacije o operativnih programih v deljenem upravljanju vsebinsko in oblikovno standardizirane;
annual summaries should be put at the disposal of Parliament and should not only be made available in the language of the Member State, thus increasing transparency and accountability;
meni tudi, da bi morali biti letni povzetki na voljo Parlamentu in ne bi smeli obstajati samo v jezikih držav članic, saj se bo tako povečala preglednost in odgovornost;
Notes, however, that neither the Court of Auditors nor the Commission considers the annual summaries to be a valuable source of information at this stage for the purposes of assessing compliance by, or the performance of, beneficiaries;
vseeno ugotavlja, da niti Računsko sodišče niti Komisija nista mnenja, da bi bili letni povzetki v tej fazi dragocen vir informacij za namene ocenjevanja skladnosti upravičencev ali njihove uspešnosti;
reiterates its request that the Commission should analyse the strengths and weaknesses of national control systems on the basis of the annual summaries received;
ponovno poudarja, da bi morala Komisija na podlagi prejetih letnih povzetkov analizirati prednosti in slabosti nacionalnih nadzornih sistemov;
considers that this situation is unacceptable and demands that the Commission take immediate action to ensure that the next annual summaries are useful for assessing the performance of beneficiaries;
meni, da ta situacija ni sprejemljiva, in zahteva, naj Komisija nemudoma ukrepa in zagotovi, da bo mogoče naslednje letne povzetke uporabiti za ocenjevanje uspešnosti upravičencev;
Points out that the annual summaries provided by the Member States ‘in [their] current form [have] been seen to provide little added value’ and that ‘the compliance elements of the current annual summary simply duplicate information readily available from other sources’ [17];
poudarja, da letni povzetki, ki jih posredujejo države članice, „v trenutni obliki ne prinašajo veliko dodane vrednosti“ in da „elementi skladnosti obstoječega letnega povzetka samo podvajajo informacije, ki so na voljo iz drugih virov“ [17];
urges, therefore, all Member States to increase the usefulness of their annual summaries by including an overall analysis of the results and an overall level of assurance statement to demonstrate their commitment to the sound financial management of Union funds and transparency;
zato poziva vse države članice, naj poskrbijo za večjo uporabnost letnih povzetkov, tako da vanje vključijo splošno analizo rezultatov in splošno izjavo o zanesljivosti, s čimer bodo dokazale zavezanost dobremu finančnemu poslovodenju sredstev Unije in preglednosti;