natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘On the basis of the analysis of costs and revenues mentioned in point 1, carried out by the IBPT/BIPT in conjunction with the College of Commissioners of La Poste, and taking account of the savings measures planned by the management of La Poste in order to align the structure of La Poste’s costs with the European average for the sector, the State’s financial contribution mentioned in point 1 is fixed at an annual amount of EUR 290613000 for each of the periods 24/09/05-23/09/06, 24/09/06-23/09/07, 24/09/07- 23/09/08, 24/09/08-23/09/09, 24/09/09-23/09/10.’
„Na podlagi analize stroškov in prihodkov iz točke 1, ki jo je opravil organ IBPT v sodelovanju s kolegijem komisarjev podjetja LA POSTE, in ob upoštevanju varčevalnih ukrepov, ki jih je predvidela uprava podjetja LA POSTE, da bi strukturo stroškov tega podjetja uskladila z evropskim povprečjem v zadevnem sektorju, je finančni poseg države določen na 290613000 EUR za vsako od naslednjih obdobij: od 24. septembra 2005 do 23. septembra 2006, od 24. septembra 2006 do 23. septembra 2007, od 24. septembra 2007 do 23. septembra 2008, od 24. septembra 2008 do 23. septembra 2009 in od 24. septembra 2009 do 23. septembra 2010.“
Thus, Article 3 of the second management contract (1997-2001) states: ‘Prices must be based on real costs. These costs are determined on the basis of the accounting rules that apply to commercial companies and whose accounting principles comply with those accepted by the institute of auditors’. Similar language is used in the first and third management contracts.
Tako člen 3 druge pogodbe o upravljanju (1997–2001) določa: „Cene morajo temeljiti na dejanskih stroških. Ti stroški se določijo glede na računovodska pravila, ki se uporabljajo za komercialna podjetja in temeljijo na računovodskih načelih, skladnih z načeli, ki jih je sprejel računovodski inštitut Institut des réviseurs d’entreprises.“ Enaka terminologija je uporabljena v prvi in tretji pogodbi o upravljanju.
Confirmation of this view as regards the second and third management contracts can be found in the Belgian submission of 14 December.
To mnenje v zvezi z drugo in tretjo pogodbo o upravljanju je navedeno v dokumentu, ki so ga predložili belgijski organi 14. decembra.
Slide 29 of this submission indicates that, in the second and third management contracts, compensation was based on real costs (not on lump sums).
V diapozitivu 29 te predstavitve je navedeno, da je nadomestilo iz druge in tretje pogodbe o upravljanju temeljilo na dejanskih stroških (in ne na pavšalnih zneskih).
Thus, Article 3 of the second management contract (1997-2001) states: ‘La Poste invoices the State periodically, on the basis of real costs, for the services supplied at a price lower than cost price.’
Tako člen 3 druge pogodbe o upravljanju (1997–2001) določa: „Podjetje LA POSTE državi na podlagi dejanskih stroškov periodično obračunava storitve, ki se opravljajo po ceni, nižji od lastne cene.“
The submission does not give any indication of the relative weightings of the different risk factors.
Predstavitev ne vsebuje nobene navedbe v zvezi z relativno težo posameznih dejavnikov tveganja.
Paragraph 17 thereof.
Točka 17 okvira o SSGP.
Article 19: ‘La Poste shall maintain basic network infrastructure for collection, sorting, transport and appropriate distribution in order to meet its obligations regarding the provision of the universal service and other public service missions mentioned in Article 2 of this management contract.’
Člen 19: „Podjetje La Poste bo vzdrževalo osnovno infrastrukturo mreže za zbiranje, razvrščanje, prevoz in ustrezno dostavo, da bodo tako izpolnjene obveznosti v zvezi z opravljanjem univerzalne storitve in drugimi nalogami javne službe iz člena 2 te pogodbe o upravljanju.“
Post offices are stand-alone outlets run and staffed by DPLP itself, whereas points poste are service counters located in third-party premises, such as supermarkets or bookstores, operating without DPLP personnel.
Poštni uradi so samostojne točke za poštne storitve, v katerih so zaposleni uslužbenci podjetja DPLP, medtem ko so poštne točke storitvene točke v prostorih tretjih oseb, na primer supermarketih ali knjigarnah, v katerih niso zaposleni uslužbenci podjetja DPLP.
While all the costs of post offices are borne by DPLP, third parties hosting a point poste receive only service fees for the postal operations carried out there.
Podjetje DPLP nosi vse stroške poštnih uradov, medtem ko tretje osebe, v prostorih katerih so poštne točke, prejmejo le plačilo za poštne storitve, ki so opravljene tam.
As a result, points poste are much less costly for DPLP to run than separate, stand-alone post offices.
To pomeni, da so poštne točke za podjetje DPLP veliko cenejše od ločenih in samostojnih poštnih uradov.
First management contract, Article 1 of the amendment of 10.5.1995; second management contract, Article 4; third management contract, Article 22; fourth management contract, Article 19.
Prva pogodba o upravljanju: člen 1 dopolnila z dne 10. maja 1995; druga pogodba o upravljanju: člen 4; tretja pogodba o upravljanju: člen 22; četrta pogodba o upravljanju: člen 19.
Directive 2002/39/EC, recital 6 and Directive 2008/6/EC, recitals 18-22.
Uvodna izjava 6 Direktive 2002/39/ES in uvodne izjave od 18 do 22 Direktive 2008/6/ES.
Letter from the Belgian authorities of 20 December 2011.
Dopis belgijskih organov z dne 20. decembra 2011.
The Belgian authorities consider, in particular, that the global approach for pre-2006 periods has been confirmed by Commission Decision 2011/747/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid C 88/97 implemented by France in favour of Crédit Mutuel (OJ L 309, 24.11.2011, p. 23).
Natančneje, belgijski organi menijo, da je bila uporaba skupnega pristopa za obdobja pred letom 2006 potrjena s Sklepom Komisije 2011/747/EU z dne 24. maja 2011 o državni pomoči C 88/97, ki jo je Francoska republika odobrila podjetju Crédit Mutuel (UL L 309, 24.11.2011, str. 23).
SGEI Framework, paragraph 12(d).
Točka 12(d) okvira o SSGP.
The Belgian authorities submitted comments on 13 August 2009 and made further submissions on 10 September 2009, 12 October 2009, 23 April 2010, 26 April 2010, 19 October 2010, 19 November 2010, 21 December 2010, 18 January 2011, 17 February 2011, 2 March 2011, 29 March 2011, 11 April 2011, 10 May 2011, 27 May 2011, 14 June 2011, 10 August 2011, 26 August 2011, 7 October 2011, 14 December 2011, 19 December 2011, 20 December 2011 and 26 December 2011.
Belgijski organi so pripombe predložili 13. avgusta 2009, nato pa so jih dopolnili še s pripombami z dne 10. septembra 2009, 12. oktobra 2009, 23. aprila 2010, 26. aprila 2010, 19. oktobra 2010, 19. novembra 2010, 21. decembra 2010, 18. januarja 2011, 17. februarja 2011, 2. marca 2011, 29. marca 2011, 11. aprila 2011, 10. maja 2011, 27. maja 2011, 14. junija 2011, 10. avgusta 2011, 26. avgusta 2011, 7. oktobra 2011, 14. decembra 2011, 19. decembra 2011, 20. decembra 2011 in 26. decembra 2011.
They pointed out that they had lodged an appeal on 22 April 2009 against the CFI judgment of 10 February 2009 and provided clarifications regarding the compensation for the public services and other ad hoc measures in favour of DPLP.
Navedli so, da so 22. aprila 2009 vložili pritožbo zoper sodbo Splošnega sodišča z dne 10. februarja 2009, in predložili dodatna pojasnila v zvezi z nadomestilom za javne storitve in drugimi ukrepi ad hoc v korist podjetja DPLP.
Between 1972 and 1996 pensions were paid under a pay-as-you-go scheme.
Med letoma 1972 in 1996 so se pokojnine izplačevale na podlagi dokladnega sistema.
Under this scheme, DPLP reimbursed the State for pensions that the State paid to retired former civil servant employees [17] for pension rights they had accumulated since 1972, when the Belgian Post Office had become a separate accounting entity within the State (Régie des Postes).
Podjetje DPLP je v skladu s tem sistemom državi vračalo znesek pokojnin, ki jih je ta izplačevala upokojenim javnim uslužbencem [17] za pokojninske pravice, ki so jih zbrali od leta 1972, ko je belgijsko podjetje La Poste postalo ločen računovodski subjekt v okviru države (Régie des postes).
Injections in 1997: DPLP received two non-notified capital injections amounting to EUR 62 million. However, the Belgian authorities subsequently stated that these funds in fact constituted delayed public service compensation, which had not been paid to DPLP on time.
Kapitalski injekciji iz leta 1997: podjetje DPLP je prejelo dve nepriglašeni kapitalski injekciji v skupni višini 62 milijonov EUR. Vendar so belgijski organi pozneje navedli, da so bila ta sredstva dejansko naknadna nadomestila za javne storitve, ki podjetju DPLP niso bila izplačana v želenem roku.
Injection in 2003: the Belgian authorities injected into DPLP capital of EUR 297,5 million. They claim that this injection was made on market economy investor terms and, therefore, according to the market economy investor principle (MEIP), does not constitute State aid.
Kapitalska injekcija iz leta 2003: belgijski organi so podjetju DPLP namenili kapitalsko injekcijo v višini 297,5 milijona EUR. Menijo, da je bila ta kapitalska injekcija izvedena pod pogoji, sprejemljivimi za zasebnega vlagatelja, ki deluje v običajnih razmerah tržnega gospodarstva, zato naj v skladu z načelom zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu ne bi bila državna pomoč.
Injection in 2006: the Belgian authorities made a new capital injection of EUR 40 million. They claim that this injection was in line with the MEIP, having been made on terms identical to those applying to a private investor (pari passu).
Kapitalska injekcija iz leta 2006: belgijski organi so zadevnemu podjetju namenili novo kapitalsko injekcijo v višini 40 milijonov EUR. Menijo, da se je ta kapitalska injekcija skladala z načelom zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, saj je bila izvedena pod pogoji, enakimi pogojem, ki se uporabljajo za zasebne vlagatelje (pari passu).
These buildings were distinct from and additional to the original assets, which had been separated from the State property when the Post Office became a separate State agency (Régie des Postes) in 1971.
Te nepremičnine so bile ločene od prvotnih sredstev, h katerim so bile dodane, saj so bile oddvojene od državnega premoženja, ko je podjetje La Poste leta 1971 postalo ločena državna agencija (Régie des postes).
The Régie des Postes was already the legal owner of the assets that had been included in its balance sheet.
Agencija Régie des postes je že imela zakonito v lasti sredstva, ki so bila pripoznana v njeni bilanci stanja.
The agreement signed between DPLP and the EIB on 22 December 2004 enabled DPLP to use the EIB credit facility until 10 June 2008.
S sporazumom, ki sta ga 22. decembra 2004 podpisali podjetje DPLP in EIB, je slednja prvemu omogočila kreditiranje do 10. junija 2008.
Making use of this facility, DPLP requested EUR 100 million on 8 November 2007, which it received on 5 December 2007.
Podjetje DPLP je na podlagi te možnosti 8. novembra 2007 zaprosilo za znesek v višini 100 milijonov EUR, ki ga je 5. decembra 2007 tudi dejansko prejelo.
DPLP undertook to reimburse the loan in 11 equal annual instalments of approximately EUR 9,09 million. The first instalment is due on 5 December 2012 and the last on 5 December 2022.
Zadevno podjetje se je zavezalo, da bo posojilo vrnilo v 11 enakih anuitetah v višini približno 9,09 milijona EUR. Prva anuiteta mora biti izplačana 5. decembra 2012, zadnja pa 5. decembra 2022.
Interest is payable quarterly (5 December, 5 March, 5 June, 5 September).
Obresti se plačujejo na tri mesece (5. decembra, 5. marca, 5. junija in 5. septembra).
2006 capital injection: the Belgian authorities claim that this injection complied with the MEIP because it was made under the same terms as applied to a private investor (pari passu), namely Post Invest Europe SA, which invested EUR 300 million. New shares were issued to both the State and the private investor. As a result, the new investor obtained 50 % minus one share, while the State retained 50 % plus one share [36].
Kapitalska injekcija iz leta 2006: belgijski organi so trdili, da se je ta kapitalska injekcija skladala z načelom zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, saj je bila zagotovljena pod enakimi pogoji (pari passu), kot so bili uporabljeni za zasebnega vlagatelja, to je podjetje Post Invest Europe SA, ki je vložilo 300 milijonov EUR. Država in novi vlagatelj sta vpisala nove delnice, da je lahko slednji prejel 50 % delnic minus en delež, država pa je ohranila 50 % delnic plus en delež [36].
However, they argue that, because the first investigative act of the Commission took place in December 2002, measures before December 1992 should be left outside the scope of the investigation.
Po drugi strani so še trdili, da v preiskavo ne bi smeli vključiti ukrepov, sprejetih pred decembrom 1992, ker je Komisija svoj prvi preiskovalni akt sprejela decembra 2002.
This concerns the transfer of buildings and the first annual subsidy paid in 1992.
To naj bi zadevalo prenos nepremičnin in prvo letno subvencijo, izplačano leta 1992.
It cannot be denied that DPLP would have faced significantly higher costs if it had had to finance pensions for all retired civil servants from its own resources after 1997.
To, da bi imelo podjetje DPLP veliko višje stroške, če bi moralo po letu 1997 iz lastnih sredstev financirati pokojnine vseh svojih upokojenih javnih uslužbencev, ni sporno.
It is evident that, without any aid, the change of legal form from public administration to private-law company would have been hampered.
Očitno je, da bi bil brez pomoči ogrožen prehod iz pravnega statusa javne uprave v status zasebnega podjetja.
1997 capital injections: the Belgian authorities have acknowledged that the 1997 capital injections of EUR 62 million were in fact a delayed payment of SGEI compensation for 1996.
Kapitalski injekciji iz leta 1997: belgijski organi so priznali, da sta bili kapitalski injekciji iz leta 1997 v višini 62 milijonov EUR dejansko naknadno nadomestilo za SSGP za leto 1996.
Therefore, they should be assessed on the same basis as the annual compensation.
Torej ju je treba presojati na enaki podlagi kot letna nadomestila.
Moreover, the potential uncertainty for a private investor that may have arisen from the non-notified aid in favour of DPLP was mitigated by the formal authorisation to proceed with the capital injection granted by the Commission in its 2003 decision.
Poleg tega je bila negotovost, ki bi ji bil lahko izpostavljen zasebni vlagatelj, če pomoč podjetju DPLP ne bi bila priglašena, omiljena s formalno odobritvijo kapitalske injekcije, ki jo je izdala Komisija v odločbi iz leta 2003.
At the time the investment was made, any private investor faced with good prospects of a return would have probably taken the risk of making the investment following the adoption of a positive Commission decision, even if that decision was not yet final.
V času izvedbe naložbe bi verjetno vsak zasebni vlagatelj z dobrimi možnostmi za donosnost tvegal izvedbo zadevne naložbe, potem ko je Komisija sprejela odločbo o odobritvi, čeprav ta še ni bila pravnomočna.
However, the measures in questions benefited all the activities of DPLP, which was active in competitive markets (such as parcel distribution and financial services) well before the entry into force of Directive 97/67/EC in 1999.
Vendar so zadevni ukrepi koristili vsem dejavnostim podjetja DPLP, ki je navzoče na konkurenčnih trgih (na primer na trgu dostave paketov in finančnih storitev), že veliko pred sprejetjem Direktive 97/67/ES leta 1999.
Consequently, according to the Alzetta judgment [59], such aid cannot be considered existing aid because of the evolution of the internal market: it can be considered existing aid to a given beneficiary to the extent that the beneficiary was active solely on markets not open to competition when the aid was put into effect.
Zato na podlagi sodbe v združenih zadevah Alzetta [59] take pomoči ni mogoče obravnavati, kot da je postala veljavna pomoč zaradi razvoja notranjega trga: kot veljavno pomoč za nekega upravičenca jo je mogoče obravnavati le, če je ta opravljal dejavnosti le na trgih, ki ob izvedbi pomoči niso bili odprti za konkurenco.
The SGEI Framework is applicable as of its entry into force on 29 November 2005.
Okvir o SSGP se uporablja od začetka veljavnosti 29. novembra 2005.
Since the Framework is largely a codification of rules that already existed before it entered into force, it will also be referred to when assessing the measures that precede its entry into force.
Ker so bila z njim večinoma kodificirana pravila, ki so obstajala že pred začetkom njegove veljavnosti, se bomo nanj sklicevali tudi pri oceni ukrepov pred začetkom njegove veljavnosti.
The relevant aspects of the WIK study were shared with Belgium on 25 March 2010 and 7 February 2011.
Upoštevni vidiki študije družbe WIK so bili Belgiji predloženi 25. marca 2010 in 7. februarja 2011.
The Commission received comments from Belgium on the WIK study on 23 April 2010 and 1 March 2011.
Komisija je pripombe Belgije k tej študiji prejela 23. aprila 2010 in 1. marca 2011.
This study was sent to Belgium on 9 December 2011.
Ta študija je bila Belgiji predložena 9. decembra 2011.
The Commission received comments from Belgium on the Deloitte study on 26 December 2011.
Komisija je pripombe Belgije k tej študiji prejela 26. decembra 2011.
Second, the method chosen by the Belgian authorities relies upon backward projection of retail network costs from 2009 to 1992.
Drugič, metoda belgijskih organov temelji na projekciji stroškov maloprodajne mreže za nazaj, to je med letoma 2009 in 1992.
Such backward projection inevitably entails methodological uncertainties.
Taka projekcija je neizogibno povezana z metodološkimi negotovostmi.
After the new issue of shares, the capital increased by EUR 340 million to EUR 783,8 million. The price per share was EUR 2500 for the existing share capital, while the new shares were issued at EUR 1464 each.
Po izdaji novih delnic se je kapital povečal za 340 milijonov EUR in je skupaj znašal 783,8 milijona EUR. Cena delnic za obstoječi kapital je bila 2500 EUR, cena novih delnic pa je bila določena na 1464 EUR.
There is an extensive economic literature on the risk and incentive properties of contracts regulating the commercial policy of firms. Cf. J.J.
Obstajajo številna ekonomska dela o lastnostih tveganja in spodbud v pogodbah, s katerimi je urejena poslovna politika podjetij.
WIK Consult, ‘Benchmarking of Cost and Profit Accounting of Certain Services Provided by DP AG (DPAG)’, Bad Honnef, October 2009.
WIK Consult: „Benchmarking of Cost and Profit Accounting of Certain Services Provided by DP AG (DPAG)“, Bad Honnef, oktober 2009.
WIK Consult is a subsidiary of the Wissenschaftliches Institut für Kommunikationsdienste (Scientific Institute for Communication Services).
Družba WIK Consult je podružnica inštituta Wissenschaftliches Institut für Kommunikationsdienste (znanstveni inštitut za komunikacijske storitve).
Deloitte derives the range of reasonable ROS on the basis of the interquartile annual ranges for the postal and parcels sample for the period 1998-2007 and the all-sector sample for the period 1990-1997.
Družba Deloitte je razpon zmernih donosov iz poslovanja izpeljala na podlagi letnih interkvartilnih razmikov vzorca za poštni sektor in sektor paketov za obdobje 1998–2007 ter vzorca vseh sektorjev za obdobje 1990–1997.
Deloitte does not provide details of the calculations, but reports the annual values for the upper and the lower bounds of the range (see for example Figure 1).
Njena študija ne vključuje nobene informacije o izračunih, temveč so v njej navedene le zgornje in spodnje meje razpona (glej na primer sliko 1).
In order to determine the price of the new shares issued, the investment bank hired by the Belgian authorities estimated DPLP’s total value at between EUR […] and EUR […]. The State finally opted for a valuation of EUR […] for the entire company before the capital injections. The Belgian authorities acknowledge that DPLP’s subsequent performance has exceeded the assumptions made at the time of the valuation.
Investicijska banka, na katero so se obrnili belgijski organi za določitev emisijske cene novih delnic, je ocenila, da skupna vrednost podjetja DPLP znaša med […] in […] EUR. Država je za celotno podjetje pred kapitalskimi injekcijami nazadnje sprejela znesek […] EUR. Belgijski organi so priznali, da so poznejši rezultati podjetja DPLP presegli predpostavke, izdelane ob oceni.
In addition, the issue price of the shares was set properly. In order to determine the price of the new shares, the investment bank hired by the Belgian authorities estimated DPLP’s total value at between EUR […] and EUR […].
Poleg tega je bila emisijska cena delnic določena pravilno.
The State finally opted for a valuation of EUR […] for the entire company before the capital injections. The assumptions regarding the level of return and risk based on a joint business plan were guided as such by considerations of long-term profit optimisation.
Investicijska banka, na katero so se obrnili belgijski organi za določitev emisijske cene novih delnic, je ocenila, da skupna vrednost podjetja DPLP znaša med […] in […] EUR. Država je za celotno podjetje pred kapitalskimi injekcijami nazadnje sprejela znesek […] EUR. Domneve v zvezi s stopnjo donosa in tveganja na podlagi skupnega poslovnega načrta so kot take temeljile na ugotovitvah glede optimizacije dobička na dolgi rok.
Chapter 2 (‘public service tasks’) of the fourth management contract, Articles 2-8. Available at the following address: http://www.bpost.be/site/fr/docs/corporate_governance/4e_contratgestion_fr.pdf.
Členi od 2 do 8 poglavja 2 (Naloge javne službe) četrte pogodbe o upravljanju, ki je na voljo na spletni strani: http://www.bpost.be/site/fr/docs/corporate_governance/4e_contratgestion_fr.pdf.
DPLP is unable to terminate the employment of statutory personnel except for serious reasons or consistently poor performance. Even in these circumstances, the dismissal procedure is subject to particularly onerous requirements.
Zato ne more prekiniti njihovih pogodb o zaposlitvi, razen v primeru hude kršitve obveznosti ali ponavljajočih se slabih rezultatov, pa še takrat so za zadevni postopek postavljene zelo stroge zahteve.
Deltamedia
Podjetje Deltamedia
By exposing the company to all variations in costs and revenues, the contract gives it incentives to improve performance and become more cost efficient. At the same time, it results in more risk for the company.
S pogodbo, na podlagi katere je družba izpostavljena vsem nihanjem cen in prihodkov, se zadevno družbo spodbuja k izboljšanju učinkovitosti ter razmerja med stroški in učinkovitostjo, zato hkrati nosi večje tveganje.
Council Decision 2012/322/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2012/322/SZVP
On 1 December 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria [1].
Svet je 1. decembra 2011 sprejel Sklep 2011/782/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Siriji [1].
It is necessary to further develop the application of Article 1(3)(b) and Article 1a(2)(b) of Decision 2011/782/CFSP.
Treba je še bolj pojasniti uporabo člena 1(3)(b) in člena 1a(2)(b) Sklepa 2011/782/SZVP.
Article 1(3)(b) is replaced by the following:
člen 1(3)(b) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
provide, directly or indirectly, financing or financial assistance related to the items referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including in particular grants, loans and export credit insurance, as well as insurance and reinsurance, for any sale, supply, transfer or export of such items, or for the provision of related technical assistance, brokering services or other services to any natural or legal person, entity or body in, or for use in, Syria.’;
neposredno ali posredno financiranje ali zagotavljanje finančne pomoči v zvezi s predmeti iz odstavkov 1 in 2, vključno zlasti z nepovratnimi sredstvi, posojili in izvozno kreditnimi zavarovanji ter zavarovanji in pozavarovanji, za vsako prodajo, dobavo, prenos ali izvoz takih predmetov ali za zagotavljanje s tem povezane tehnične pomoči, posredniških ali drugih storitev fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, subjektom ali organom v Siriji ali za uporabo v tej državi.“;
Article 1a(2)(b) is replaced by the following:
člen 1a(2)(b) se nadomesti z naslednjim: