natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The financial arrangements shall respect the chain of command as provided for in Articles 5, 6 and 9, and the operational requirements of EUMM Georgia, including the compatibility of equipment and the interoperability of its teams.
Pri finančni ureditvi se upoštevajo struktura poveljevanja, določena v členih 5, 6 in 9, ter operativne potrebe EUMM Georgia, vključno z združljivostjo opreme in interoperabilnostjo njenih enot.
Expenditure shall be eligible as of the date of entry into force of this Decision.’;
Odhodki so upravičeni od datuma začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa.“;
In Article 18, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
v členu 18 se drugi odstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘It shall expire on 14 December 2014.’.
„Veljati preneha 14. decembra 2014.“
It shall apply from 15 September 2013.
Uporablja se od 15. septembra 2013.
Done at Brussels, 6 September 2013.
V Bruslju, 6. septembra 2013
of 5 September 2013
z dne 5. septembra 2013
on the standard capacity utilisation factor pursuant to Article 18(2) of Decision 2011/278/EU
o standardnem faktorju uporabe zmogljivosti v skladu s členom 18(2) Sklepa 2011/278/EU
Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC [1], and in particular Article 10a thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. oktobra 2003 o vzpostavitvi sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti in o spremembi Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 10a Direktive,
In order to enable Member States to determine in accordance with Article 18(1) and (3) of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU [2] the activity levels of new entrant installations pursuant to Article 3(h) of Directive 2003/87/EC, the Commission has to determine and publish standard capacity utilisation factors.
Da se državam članicam omogoči, da v skladu s členom 18(1) in (3) Sklepa Komisije 2011/278/EU [2] določijo ravni dejavnosti novih udeležencev v skladu s členom 3(h) Direktive 2003/87/ES, mora Komisija določiti in objaviti standardne faktorje uporabe zmogljivosti.
For the purpose of calculating the number of free emission allowances to be allocated to new entrant installations eligible for such allocation in the period 2013-20, Member States have to determine the activity levels of these installations.
Za izračun količine brezplačnih pravic do emisije, ki se bodo dodelile novim udeležencem, upravičenim do take dodelitve v obdobju 2013–2020, morajo države članice določiti ravni dejavnosti teh naprav.
In this context, the standard capacity utilisation factor is necessary to determine the product-related activity level for products for which a product benchmark has been determined in Annex I to Decision 2011/278/EU.
V zvezi s tem je potreben standardni faktor uporabe zmogljivosti za določitev ravni dejavnosti po posameznih proizvodih za proizvode, za katere je bila v Prilogi I k Sklepu 2011/278/EU določena referenčna vrednost.
For new entrant installations, with the exception of new entrants due to a significant extension, this activity level is determined by multiplying the initial installed capacity for the production of this product in accordance with Article 17(4) of Decision 2011/278/EU with the standard capacity utilisation factor.
Za nove udeležence, z izjemo naprav, ki so novi udeleženci zaradi bistvenega povečanja, se ta raven dejavnosti določi tako, da se začetna nameščena zmogljivost za proizvodnjo tega proizvoda v skladu s členom 17(4) Sklepa 2011/278/EU pomnoži s standardnim faktorjem uporabe zmogljivosti.
For installations which had a significant capacity extension or reduction, Member States are to use the standard capacity utilisation factor to determine the product-related activity level of the added or reduced capacity of the subinstallation concerned.
Za naprave, ki so imele bistveno povečanje ali zmanjšanje zmogljivosti, morajo države članice uporabiti standardni faktor uporabe zmogljivosti za določitev ravni dejavnosti po posameznih proizvodih razširjene ali zmanjšane zmogljivosti zadevne podnaprave.
The standard capacity utilisation factor should be the 80-percentile of the average annual capacity utilisation of all installations producing the product concerned.
Standardni faktor uporabe zmogljivosti bi moral biti 80. percentil povprečne letne uporabe zmogljivosti vseh naprav, ki proizvajajo zadevni proizvod.
Member States then shared this information with the Commission as part of the NIMs.
Te informacije so nato Komisiji sporočile v okviru nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov.
Upon receipt of the NIMs from all Member States and taking into account the NIMs of the EEA-EFTA countries, the Commission determined the 80-percentile of the average annual capacity utilisation factors of installations producing a product for which a benchmark exists, taking into account the need to ensure neutral conditions of competition for industrial activities carried out in installations operated by a single operator and production in outsourced installations.
Komisija je po tem, ko je od vseh držav članic prejela nacionalne izvedbene ukrepe, ter ob upoštevanju nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov držav EGP-Efta določila 80. percentil povprečnih letnih vrednosti faktorjev uporabe zmogljivosti naprav, ki proizvajajo proizvod, za katerega obstaja referenčna vrednost, pri čemer je upoštevala potrebo po zagotovitvi nevtralnih konkurenčnih pogojev za industrijske dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo v napravah, ki jih upravlja en sam upravljavec, in proizvodnjo v zunanjih napravah.
The calculation is based on information available to the Commission up until 31 December 2012.
Izračun temelji na informacijah, do katerih je Komisija imela dostop do 31. decembra 2012.
The standard capacity utilisation factors per product benchmark are set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Standardni faktorji uporabe zmogljivosti po referenčnih vrednostih za proizvod so navedeni v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
These factors apply for the years 2013 to 2020,
Ti faktorji se uporabljajo za leta od 2013 do 2020 –
The standard capacity utilisation factors listed in the Annex shall be used by Member States to determine the product-related activity level of installations referred to in Article 3(h) of Directive 2003/87/EC in accordance with Article 18 of Decision 2011/278/EU.
Države članice uporabijo standardne faktorje uporabe zmogljivosti iz Priloge za določitev ravni dejavnosti po posameznih proizvodih naprav iz člena 3(h) Direktive 2003/87/ES v skladu s členom 18 Sklepa 2011/278/EU.
This Decision shall enter into force on the first day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels, 5 September 2013.
V Bruslju, 5. septembra 2013
Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 130, 17.5.2011, p. 1).
Sklep Komisije 2011/278/EU z dne 27. aprila 2011 o določitvi prehodnih pravil za usklajeno brezplačno dodelitev pravic do emisije na ravni Unije v skladu s členom 10a Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 130, 17.5.2011, str. 1).
Product benchmark listed in Annex I to Decision 2011/278/EU
Referenčna vrednost za proizvod iz Priloge I k Sklepu 2011/278/EU
Standard capacity utilisation factor (SCUF)
Standardni faktor uporabe zmogljivosti
Spray dried powder
Prašek, posušen z razprševanjem
Sulphite pulp, thermo-mechanical and mechanical pulp
Sulfitna celuloza, termomehanična celuloza in mehanična celuloza
As part of the overall baseline data collection for incumbent installations carried out for the establishment of the National Implementation Measures (NIMs), Member States collected data on the average annual production of the product concerned in the period 2005-08.
Države članice so v okviru splošnega zbiranja izhodiščnih podatkov za obstoječe naprave, ki so ga izvedle za pripravo nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov, zbrale podatke o povprečni letni proizvodnji zadevnega proizvoda v obdobju 2005–2008.
By dividing these production figures by the initial installed capacity as referred to in Article 7(3) of Decision 2011/278/EU, Member States then determined, on this basis, the capacity utilisation factors of the relevant installations on their territory.
Ta podatek o proizvodnji so države članice nato delile z začetno nastavljeno zmogljivostjo iz člena 7(3) Sklepa 2011/278/EU ter na podlagi tega določile faktorje uporabe zmogljivosti zadevnih naprav na njihovem ozemlju.
concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
v zvezi z nacionalnimi izvedbenimi ukrepi za prehodno brezplačno dodeljevanje pravic do emisije toplogrednih plinov v skladu s členom 11(3) Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2013) 5666)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 5666)
Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC [1], and in particular Articles 10a and 11 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. oktobra 2003 o vzpostavitvi sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti in o spremembi Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES [1], ter zlasti členov 10a in 11 Direktive.
Auctioning is the rule for the allocation of emission allowances from 2013 onwards to operators of installations within the scope of the emissions trading scheme of the Union (EU ETS).
Od leta 2013 se pravice do emisije upravljavcem naprav, ki so vključene v sistem Unije za trgovanje z emisijami (EU ETS), dodeljujejo z dražbo.
Member States were required to submit to the Commission by 30 September 2011 their National Implementation Measures (NIMs) comprising, among other mandatory information, a list of installations covered by Directive 2003/87/EC on their territory and the preliminary amount of free allowances to be allocated between 2013 and 2020 calculated on the basis of the Union-wide harmonised rules.
Od držav članic se je zahtevalo, da Komisiji do 30. septembra 2011 predložijo svoje nacionalne izvedbene ukrepe, ki naj poleg drugih obveznih informacij vsebujejo tudi seznam naprav na njihovem ozemlju, ki so zajete v Direktivi 2003/87/ES, ter predhodne količine pravic do emisije, ki bodo brezplačno dodeljene med letoma 2013 in 2020, izračunane na podlagi usklajenih pravil na ravni Unije.
Article 18 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community [3] provides for transitional measures applying in respect of Croatia and set out in Annex V to this Act.
Člen 18 Akta o pogojih pristopa Republike Hrvaške in prilagoditvah Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo [3] določa prehodne ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za Hrvaško in so navedeni v Prilogi V k Aktu.
Accordingly, Croatia submitted the NIMs to the Commission in accordance with Article 11(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC and Article 15(1) of Decision 2011/278/EU.
Hrvaška je tako Komisiji predložila nacionalne izvedbene ukrepe v skladu s členom 11(1) Direktive 2003/87/ES in členom 15(1) Sklepa 2011/278/EU.
To ensure data quality and comparability, the Commission provided an electronic template for the submission of the NIMs.
Za zagotovitev kakovosti in primerljivosti podatkov je Komisija zagotovila elektronsko predlogo za predložitev nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov.
All Member States submitted in this or in a similar format a list of installations, a table containing all relevant data per installation and a methodology report setting out the data collection process conducted by Member States’ authorities.
V tej ali podobni obliki so vse države članice predložile seznam naprav, razpredelnico z vsemi ustreznimi podatki o posameznih napravah in metodološko poročilo, v katerem je opisan postopek zbiranja podatkov, ki so ga izvedli organi držav članic.
Given the wide range of information and data submitted, the Commission first analysed the completeness of all the NIMs.
Zaradi številnih predloženih informacij in podatkov je Komisija najprej preverila popolnost vseh nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov.
Where the Commission noted that submissions were incomplete, it requested additional information from the Member States concerned.
Kjer je Komisija ugotovila nepopolnosti, je od zadevnih držav članic zahtevala dodatne informacije.
In reply to those requests, the relevant authorities submitted additional relevant information in order to complete the submitted NIMs.
Kot odgovor na to zahtevo so zadevni organi predložili dodatne informacije za dopolnitev predloženih nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov.
The Commission carried out an in-depth compliance assessment of the NIMs for each individual Member State.
Komisija je izvedla poglobljeno oceno skladnosti nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov za vsako državo članico.
As part of that comprehensive assessment, the Commission analysed the consistency of the data itself and the consistency of the data with the harmonised allocation rules.
V okviru te celovite ocene je Komisija analizirala skladnost samih podatkov ter skladnost podatkov z usklajenimi pravili dodeljevanja.
First, the Commission examined the eligibility of installations for free allocation, the division of installations into subinstallations and their boundaries.
Komisija je najprej proučila upravičenost naprav do brezplačne dodelitve, razdelitev naprav na podnaprave in njihove meje.
The Commission then analysed the application of the correct benchmark values to the relevant subinstallations.
Nato je analizirala, ali so bile za podnaprave uporabljene pravilne referenčne vrednosti.
Considering that for product-benchmark subinstallations Decision 2011/278/EU lays down, in principle, for each product one benchmark, the Commission paid particular attention to the application of the benchmark value to the final product produced in accordance with the product definition and the system boundaries set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/278/EU.
Glede na to, da Sklep 2011/278/EU za podnaprave z referenčnimi vrednostmi za proizvode načeloma določa eno referenčno vrednost za vsak proizvod, je bila Komisija zlasti pozorna na uporabo referenčne vrednosti pri končnem proizvodu, narejenem v skladu z opisom proizvoda in mejami sistema iz Priloge I k Sklepu 2011/278/EU.
Furthermore, given the significant impact on allocations, the Commission analysed in detail the calculation of the historical activity levels of installations, cases of significant capacity changes during the baseline period as well as cases of installations starting operation during the baseline period, the calculation of the preliminary number of emission allowances to be allocated free of charge taking into account the exchangeability of fuel and electricity, the carbon leakage status as well as heat exports to private households.
Zaradi znatnega učinka na dodelitve je Komisija poleg tega podrobno analizirala izračun preteklih ravni dejavnosti naprav, primere znatne spremembe zmogljivosti v uvodnem obdobju in primere naprav, ki so začele delovati v uvodnem obdobju, izračun predhodne količine brezplačno dodeljenih pravic ob upoštevanju izmenljivosti goriva in električne energije, status premestitve emisij in odvedeno toploto zasebnim gospodinjstvom.
Further statistical analyses and plausibility checks using indicators such as, for example, proposed allocation per historical activity level compared to benchmark values or historical activity level compared to production capacity helped in identifying additional potential irregularities in the application of the harmonised allocation rules.
Z dodatnimi statističnimi analizami in preverjanji verodostojnosti s pomočjo kazalnikov, kot sta predlagana dodelitev glede na preteklo raven dejavnosti v primerjavi z referenčnimi vrednostmi ali pretekla raven dejavnosti v primerjavi s proizvodno zmogljivostjo, so bile ugotovljene dodatne morebitne nepravilnosti pri uporabi usklajenih pravil dodeljevanja.
On the basis of the results of that assessment, the Commission carried out a detailed assessment of installations where potential irregularities in the application of the harmonised allocation rules were identified, seeking further clarification from the competent authorities of the Member State concerned.
Na podlagi rezultatov te ocene je Komisija izvedla podrobno oceno naprav, za katere so bile ugotovljene morebitne nepravilnosti pri uporabi usklajenih pravil dodeljevanja, ter od pristojnih organov zadevnih držav članic zahtevala dodatna pojasnila.
In the light of the results of that compliance assessment, the Commission considers the NIMs of Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom to be compatible with Directive 2003/87/EC and Decision 2011/278/EU.
Glede na rezultate te ocene skladnosti Komisija meni, da so nacionalni izvedbeni ukrepi Avstrije, Belgije, Bolgarije, Cipra, Danske, Estonije, Finske, Francije, Grčije, Hrvaške, Irske, Italije, Latvije, Litve, Luksemburga, Madžarske, Malte, Nizozemske, Poljske, Portugalske, Romunije, Slovaške, Slovenije, Španije, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva skladni z Direktivo 2003/87/ES in Sklepom 2011/278/EU.
The installations included in the NIMs by these Member States have been found eligible for free allocation and no inconsistencies with regard to the preliminary total annual amounts of emission allowances allocated free of charge proposed by each of these Member States could be detected.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so naprave, ki so jih te države članice vključile v nacionalne izvedbene ukrepe, upravičene do brezplačne dodelitve, in odkrita niso bila nobena neskladja v zvezi s predhodnimi skupnimi letnimi količinami brezplačno dodeljenih pravic do emisije, ki so jih predlagale te države članice.
But, in the light of the results of the assessment, the Commission finds that certain aspects of the NIMs submitted by the Czech Republic and Germany are incompatible with the criteria contained in Directive 2003/87/EC and in Decision 2011/278/EU, taking into account the Commission’s guidance documents to Member States endorsed by the Climate Change Committee on 14 April 2011.
Vendar glede na rezultate ocene Komisija meni, da nekateri vidiki nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov, ki sta jih predložili Nemčija in Češka republika, niso skladni z merili iz Direktive 2003/87/ES in Sklepa 2011/278/EU, ob upoštevanju smernic Komisije za države članice, ki jih je Odbor za podnebne spremembe odobril 14. aprila 2011.
The Commission notes that Germany has proposed that seven installations receive an increase in the level of free allocation of emission allowances because it considers this would avoid undue hardship.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Nemčija za sedem naprav predlagala povečanje ravni brezplačne dodelitve pravic do emisije, da bi tako preprečila nepotrebne težave.
In accordance with Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC and Decision 2011/278/EU, the preliminary amounts of free allocation to be submitted as part of the NIMs are calculated on the basis of harmonised Union-wide rules.
V skladu s členom 10a Direktive 2003/87/ES in Sklepom 2011/278/EU se predhodne količine brezplačno dodeljenih pravic, ki jih je treba predložiti kot del nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepov, izračunajo na podlagi usklajenih pravil na ravni Unije.
Decision 2011/278/EU does not provide for the adjustment which Germany would wish to make on the basis of Article 9(5) of the German Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Act — TEHG of 28 July 2011.
Sklep 2011/278/EU ne določa prilagoditve, ki jo želi Nemčija izvesti na podlagi člena 9(5) nemškega Zakona o trgovanju z emisijami toplogrednih plinov (TEHG) z dne 28. julija 2011.
Whereas until 2012, free allocation of emission allowances was organised nationally, for the period as of 2013 the legislator intentionally established fully-harmonised rules for free allocation to installations, so that all installations are treated in the same manner.
Medtem ko je bilo do leta 2012 brezplačno dodeljevanje pravic do emisije organizirano na nacionalni ravni, pa je zakonodajalec za obdobje od leta 2013 naprej namenoma vzpostavil v celoti usklajena pravila za brezplačno dodeljevanje pravic napravam, da bodo tako vse naprave obravnavane enako.
Any unilateral change to the preliminary amounts of free allocation calculated by Member States on the basis of Decision 2011/278/EU would undermine this harmonised approach.
Kakršna koli enostranska sprememba predhodnih količin brezplačno dodeljenih pravic, ki so jih države članice izračunale na podlagi Sklepa 2011/278/EU, bi omajala ta usklajeni pristop.
Germany has not substantiated that the allocation for the installations in question calculated on the basis of Decision 2011/278/EU was manifestly inappropriate having regard to the objective of full harmonisation of allocations to be achieved.
Nemčija ni jasno utemeljila, da je dodelitev pravic zadevnim napravam, izračunana na podlagi Sklepa 2011/278/EU, neustrezna glede na cilj popolne uskladitve dodeljevanja, ki ga je treba doseči.
Assigning more free allowances to some installations would distort or threaten to distort competition and has cross-border effects given Union-wide trade in all sectors covered by Directive 2003/87/EC.
Dodelitev večje količine brezplačnih pravic nekaterim napravam bi izkrivila ali bi lahko izkrivila konkurenco in ima čezmejne posledice zaradi vseevropske trgovine v vseh sektorjih, zajetih v Direktivi 2003/87/ES.
In the light of the principle of equal treatment of installations under the EU ETS and of Member States, the Commission finds that it is therefore appropriate to object to the preliminary amounts of free allocation to certain installations contained in the German NIMs and listed in point A of Annex I.
Ob upoštevanju načela enake obravnave naprav v okviru sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami in držav članic Komisija ugotavlja, da je zato smiselno nasprotovati predhodnim količinam brezplačno dodeljenih pravic nekaterim napravam, ki so vključene v nemške nacionalne izvedbene ukrepe in navedene v točki A Priloge I.
The Commission finds that the NIMs proposed by Germany also contravene Decision 2011/278/EU because the application of the product benchmark for hot metal in the cases listed in point B of Annex I to this Decision is inconsistent with the relevant rules.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so nacionalni izvedbeni ukrepi, ki jih je predlagala Nemčija, tudi v nasprotju s Sklepom 2011/278/EU, saj uporaba referenčnih vrednosti za vročo litino v primerih, navedenih v točki B Priloge I k temu sklepu, ni v skladu z zadevnimi pravili.
In this regard, the Commission observes that in the German NIMs, in cases of basic oxygen furnace (BOF) steelmaking processes and where hot metal from the blast furnace is not refined to steel within the same installation, but exported for further processing, no free allocation of emission allowances is provided to the operator of the installation with the blast furnace for the production of the hot metal.
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da v nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepih Nemčije pri procesih proizvodnje jekla z martinovko in primeru, ko se vroča litina iz plavža ne predeluje v jeklo v isti napravi, temveč se pošlje v nadaljnjo predelavo, upravljavcu naprave s plavžem za proizvodnjo vroče litine ni zagotovljena brezplačna dodelitev pravic.