natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, classification under heading 3824 is excluded by application of General Rule 3(a).
Z uporabo splošnega pravila 3(a) je uvrstitev pod tarifno številko 3824 zato izključena.
The product is a simple mixture of ethyl alcohol and ETBE.
Ta proizvod je enostavna mešanica etilnega alkohola in ETBE.
The percentage level of ETBE in the product renders it unfit for human consumption but does not prevent the use of the product for industrial purposes (see also the HS Explanatory Notes to heading 2207, fourth paragraph).
Zaradi deleža vsebnosti ETBE v proizvodu ni primeren za prehrano ljudi, vendar ga to ne izključuje iz uporabe za industrijske namene (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe HS k tarifni številki 2207, četrti odstavek).
The product is therefore to be classified under CN code 22072000 as denatured ethyl alcohol.
Proizvod se zato uvrsti pod tarifno oznako KN 22072000 kot denaturiran etilni alkohol.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 71/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 71/2013
of 25 January 2013
z dne 25. januarja 2013
amending Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 as regards the entry for Uruguay in the list of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction of fresh meat into the Union and correcting that Regulation as regards the model veterinary certificate for ovine and caprine animals intended for breeding or production after importation
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 206/2010 glede vnosa za Urugvaj na seznamu tretjih držav, njihovih ozemelj ali delov, iz katerih se odobri vnos svežega mesa v Unijo, in o popravku navedene uredbe glede vzorca veterinarskega spričevala za ovce in koze, namenjene za vzrejo ali proizvodnjo po uvozu
Having regard to Council Directive 2004/68/EC of 26 April 2004 laying down animal health rules for the importation into and transit through the Community of certain live ungulate animals, amending Directives 90/426/EEC and 92/65/EEC and repealing Directive 72/462/EEC [1], and in particular Article 6(1), Article 7 point (e), and Article 13(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2004/68/ES z dne 26. aprila 2004 o določitvi predpisov v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali za uvoz v Skupnost in tranzit skozi Skupnost nekaterih živih parkljarjev, o spremembi direktiv 90/426/EGS in 92/65/EGS ter razveljavitvi Direktive 72/462/EGS [1], zlasti člena 6(1), člena 7(e) in člena 13(1) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [2], and in particular the introductory phrase and points (1) and (4) of Article 8, thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [2], zlasti uvodnega stavka člena 8 ter člena 8(1) in (4) Direktive,
It also establishes lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof which fulfill certain criteria and from which therefore consignments may be introduced into the Union.
Določa tudi sezname tretjih držav, njihovih ozemelj ali delov, ki izpolnjujejo določena merila in iz katerih je zato dovoljen vnos pošiljk v Unijo.
Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 authorises the imports of fresh deboned and matured bovine meat from the whole territory of Uruguay.
Uredba (EU) št. 206/2010 dovoljuje uvoz svežega izkoščenega in zorjenega govejega mesa s celotnega ozemlja Urugvaja.
Uruguay is free of foot and mouth disease but practices vaccination.
Urugvaj je prost slinavke in parkljevke, vendar izvaja cepljenja.
It has thus a general health status for bovine animals different from that of the Union.
To pomeni, da ima drugačen splošni zdravstveni status goveda kot Unija.
As a result Uruguay is only allowed to export fresh deboned and matured meat of bovine animals.
Zato lahko Urugvaj izvaža samo sveže izkoščeno in zorjeno goveje meso.
The import requirements provide that the bovine animals intended for slaughter for export of fresh meat to the Union are sent directly from the holding of origin to the slaughterhouse.
V skladu z zahtevami za uvoz mora biti govedo, ki je namenjeno za zakol za izvoz svežega mesa v Unijo, poslano z gospodarstva izvora neposredno v klavnico.
This rule excludes many small holdings from producing for the Union market as their animals always pass through assembly centres or animal markets before slaughter.
Zaradi tega pravila številna mala gospodarstva ne morejo proizvajati za trg Unije, saj gredo njihove živali pred zakolom vedno čez zbirne centre ali živinske tržnice.
A Union audit in March 2012 confirmed that Uruguay’s identification and movement registration system allows certifying veterinarians to verify the prior whereabouts of the animals.
Pregled, ki ga je Unija izvedla marca 2012, je potrdil, da urugvajski sistem identifikacije in beleženja premikov omogoča veterinarjem, ki izdajajo spričevala, da preverijo predhodne lokacije živali.
The system thus ensures that animals have stayed 40 days on one holding before transport to the slaughterhouse.
Sistem tako zagotavlja, da so živali pred prevozom v klavnico ostale 40 dni na enem gospodarstvu.
Uruguay can also guarantee that the Union animal health import requirements for bovine animals destined for slaughter for export of fresh deboned and matured bovine meat to the Union are respected even if those animals pass through assembly centres and/or markets prior to slaughter due to a system that identifies all bovine animals individually so that they can be traced back to their origin.
Urugvaj prav tako lahko zagotovi, da so zahteve Unije glede zdravstvenega varstva, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz goveda, namenjenega za zakol za izvoz svežega izkoščenega in zorjenega govejega mesa v Unijo, izpolnjene tudi, če gredo zadevne živali pred zakolom čez zbirne centre in/ali živinske tržnice, in sicer na podlagi sistema, ki identificira vsako posamezno govedo in tako omogoča določitev njegovega izvora.
Uruguay thus offers guarantees sufficient to ensure that all bovine animals whose meat is destined for export to the Union have the same health status when passing through an assembly centre (including markets) in Uruguay prior to slaughter.
Urugvaj ima tako zadostna jamstva za zagotovitev, da ima vse govedo, katerega meso je namenjeno za izvoz v Unijo, enak zdravstveni status, ko gre pred zakolom čez zbirni center (vključno s tržnicami) v Urugvaju.
Therefore, the entry corresponding to this country in the list in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 should be adapted.
Zato bi bilo treba vnos za to državo na seznamu v delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 prilagoditi.
An error appeared in two references to footnotes contained in Part II.2 of the model certificate ‘OVI-X’ set out in Part 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010.
V dveh sklicih na opombi v točki II.2 vzorca veterinarskega spričevala „OVI-X“ iz dela 2 Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 se je pojavila napaka.
Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 should therefore be amended and corrected accordingly.
Uredbo (EU) št. 206/2010 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti in popraviti.
In Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010, the row relating to Uruguay is replaced by the following:
V delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 se vrstica za Urugvaj nadomesti z naslednjim:
Closing date(2)
Končni datum(2)
Opening date(3)
Začetni datum (3)
‘UY – Uruguay
„UY – Urugvaj
A and J
A in J
1 November 2001’
1. novembra 2001“
Correcting provisions
Določbe o popravkih
In Part 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010, Part II of the model certificate ‘OVI-X’, is corrected as follows:
V delu 2 Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 se del II vzorca veterinarskega spričevala „OVI-X“ spremeni:
in point II.2.8, the phrase:
v točki II.2.8 se stavek:
either [II.2.8.2.
bodisi [II.2.8.2.
are animals intended for production born in and continuously reared on holdings in which a case of scrapie has never been diagnosed;]’
so živali, namenjene za proizvodnjo, rojene in neprekinjeno rejene na gospodarstvih, na katerih nikoli ni bila odkrita bolezen praskavca;]“;
in point II.2.9, the introductory phrase:
v točki II.2.9 se uvodni stavek:
‘they are/were(1) dispatched from their holding(s) of origin, without passing through any market,’
„so/so bile (1) odpremljene z gospodarstev izvora, ne da bi bile vmes dane na trg,“
‘they are/were(2) dispatched from their holding(s) of origin, without passing through any market,’
„so/so bile (2) odpremljene z gospodarstev izvora, ne da bi bile vmes dane na trg,“.
Done at Brussels, 25 January 2013.
V Bruslju, 25. januarja 2013
OJ L 139, 30.4.2004; p. 321.
UL L 139, 30.4.2004, str. 321.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 72/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 72/2013
amending Regulations (EC) No 180/2008 and (EC) No 737/2008 as regards the period of designation of certain laboratories as EU reference laboratories
o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 180/2008 in (ES) št. 737/2008 glede obdobja imenovanja nekaterih laboratorijev za referenčne laboratorije EU
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals [1], and in particular Article 55(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2006/88/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in proizvodov iz ribogojstva ter o preprečevanju in nadzoru nekaterih bolezni pri vodnih živalih [1], zlasti člena 55(1) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 2009/156/EC of 30 November 2009 on animal health conditions governing the movement and importation from third countries of equidae [2], and in particular Article 19(d) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2009/156/ES z dne 30. novembra 2009 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki ureja premike in uvoz kopitarjev iz tretjih držav [2], zlasti člena 19(d) Direktive,
By Commission Regulation (EC) No 180/2008 of 28 February 2008 concerning the Community reference laboratory for equine diseases other than African horse sickness and amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], the Commission designated ANSES with its laboratories for animal health and equine diseases, France, as the EU reference laboratory for equine diseases other than African horse sickness for a period of five years from 1 July 2008 and set up its functions, tasks and procedures regarding collaboration with laboratories responsible for diagnosing infectious diseases of equidae in the Member States.
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 180/2008 z dne 28. februarja 2008 o referenčnem laboratoriju Skupnosti za bolezni kopitarjev razen konjske kuge in spremembi Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] je Komisija imenovala francosko agencijo ANSES z laboratoriji za zdravje živali in bolezni enoprstih kopitarjev za referenčni laboratorij EU za bolezni enoprstih kopitarjev, razen konjske kuge, za petletno obdobje od 1. julija 2008 in opredelila njegove funkcije, naloge in postopke glede sodelovanja z laboratoriji, pristojnimi za diagnosticiranje nalezljivih bolezni enoprstih kopitarjev v državah članicah.
By Commission Regulation (EC) No 737/2008 of 28 July 2008 designating the Community reference laboratories for crustacean diseases, rabies and bovine tuberculosis, laying down additional responsibilities and tasks for the Community reference laboratories for rabies and bovine tuberculosis and amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], the Commission designated the Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory, United Kingdom, as the EU reference laboratory for crustacean diseases for a period of five years from 1 July 2008.
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 737/2008 z dne 28. julija 2008 o imenovanju referenčnih laboratorijev Skupnosti za bolezni rakov, steklino in govejo tuberkulozo, določitvi dodatnih pristojnosti in nalog referenčnih laboratorijev Skupnosti za steklino in govejo tuberkulozo ter spremembi Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] je Komisija imenovala Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory iz Združenega kraljestva za referenčni laboratorij EU za bolezni rakov za petletno obdobje od 1. julija 2008.
In order to ensure a high quality and uniformity of analytical and diagnostic results in the Union, it is important that the designated EU reference laboratories for equine diseases other than African horse sickness and for crustacean diseases continue to carry out their activities for another five year period.
Za zagotovitev visoke kakovosti in enotnosti analitičnih in diagnostičnih rezultatov v Uniji je pomembno, da imenovana referenčna laboratorija EU za bolezni enoprstih kopitarjev, razen konjske kuge, in bolezni rakov še naprej izvajata svoje dejavnosti dodatnih pet let.
The period for which those laboratories were designated as EU reference laboratories should therefore be extended.
Zato bi bilo treba podaljšati obdobje, za katero sta bila navedena laboratorija imenovana za referenčna laboratorija EU.
After the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the laboratories listed in Regulation (EC) No 737/2008 previously referred to as ‘Community reference laboratories’ should now be referred to as ‘European Union (EU) reference laboratories’.
Zaradi veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe bi bilo treba laboratorije iz Uredbe (ES) št. 737/2008, poimenovane kot „referenčni laboratoriji Skupnosti“, preimenovati v „referenčne laboratorije Evropske unije (EU)“.
Regulations (EC) No 180/2008 and (EC) No 737/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbi (ES) št. 180/2008 in (ES) št. 737/2008 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 180/2008, the date ‘30 June 2013’ is replaced by the date ‘30 June 2018’.
V členu 1(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 180/2008 se datum „30. junija 2013“ nadomesti z datumom „30. junija 2018“.
Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 737/2008 is replaced by the following:
Člen 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 737/2008 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory, United Kingdom, is hereby designated as the EU reference laboratory for crustacean diseases from 1 July 2008 until 30 June 2018.’
The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory, Združeno kraljestvo se imenuje za referenčni laboratorij EU za bolezni rakov od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2018.“
Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 73/2013
amending Annexes I and V to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals
o spremembi prilog I in V k Uredbi (ES) št. 689/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij
Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 implements the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure (‘PIC procedure’) for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade, signed on 11 September 1998 and approved, on behalf of the Community, by Council Decision 2003/106/EC [2].
Uredba (ES) št. 689/2008 izvaja Rotterdamsko konvencijo o postopku soglasja po predhodnem obvestilu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: postopek PIC) za določene nevarne kemikalije in pesticide v mednarodni trgovini, ki je bila podpisana 11. septembra 1998 in odobrena v imenu Skupnosti s Sklepom Sveta 2003/106/ES [2].
It is appropriate that regulatory action in respect of certain chemicals taken pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC [3], Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market [4] and Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC [5] be taken into account.
Primerno je upoštevati ureditvene ukrepe v zvezi z nekaterimi kemikalijami, ki so bili sprejeti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in razveljavitvi direktiv Sveta 79/117/EGS in 91/414/EGS [3], Direktivo 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet [4] ter Uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH), o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije ter spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 ter Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS in direktiv Komisije 91/155/EGS, 93/67/EGS, 93/105/ES in 2000/21/ES [5].
Decisions taken in respect of certain chemicals under the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants (‘the Stockholm Convention’), signed on 22 May 2001 and approved, on behalf of the Community, by Council Decision 2006/507/EC [6] and subsequent regulatory action in respect of those chemicals taken pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EEC [7] should also be taken into account.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba tudi sklepe, ki so bili sprejeti v zvezi z nekaterimi kemikalijami v okviru Stockholmske konvencije o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Stockholmska konvencija), podpisane 22. maja 2001 in odobrene s strani Skupnosti s Sklepom Sveta 2006/507/ES [6], in nadaljnje regulativne ukrepe v zvezi s temi kemikalijami, ki so bili sprejeti na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih in spremembi Direktive 79/117/EGS [7].
The substances acetochlor, asulam, chloropicrin and propargite have not been approved as active substances under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, with the effect that those substances are banned for pesticide use and thus should be added to the lists of chemicals contained in Parts 1 and 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008.
Snovi acetoklor, asulam, kloropikrin in propargit niso bile odobrene kot aktivne snovi na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 ter se tako ne smejo uporabljati kot pesticidi in bi jih bilo treba dodati na seznama kemikalij iz delov 1 in 2 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 689/2008.
The addition of acetochlor, asulam, chloropicrin and propargite to Annex I was suspended due to a new application for inclusion in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [8] submitted pursuant to Article 13 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [9].
Vključitev acetoklora, asulama, kloropikrina in propargita v Prilogo I je bila začasno odložena, ker je bil v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [8], predložen nov zahtevek za vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [9].
That new application resulted again in the decision not to approve the substances acetochlor, asulam, chloropicrin and propargite as active substances under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 with the effect that acetochlor, asulam, chloropicrin and propargite remain banned for pesticide use and that the reason for suspending the addition to Annex I disappeared.
Tudi na podlagi tega novega zahtevka je bilo sklenjeno, da se snovi acetoklor, asulam, kloropikrin in propargit ne odobrijo kot aktivne snovi na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, zaradi česar se acetoklor, asulam, kloropikrin in propargit še naprej ne smejo uporabljati kot pesticidi, ter da razloga za začasno odložitev njihove vključitve v Prilogo I ni več.
Therefore, the substances acetochlor, asulam, chloropicrin and propargite should be added to the lists of chemicals contained in Parts 1 and 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008.
Snovi acetoklor, asulam, kloropikrin in propargit bi bilo zato treba dodati na seznama kemikalij iz delov 1 in 2 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 689/2008.
The substance flufenoxuron has not been approved as an active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and the substance flufenoxuron has not been included as an active substance in Annex I, IA or IB to Directive 98/8/EC for product type 18, with the effect that flufenoxuron is severely restricted for pesticide use and thus should be added to the lists of chemicals contained in Parts 1 and 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 because virtually all use is prohibited despite the fact that flufenoxuron has been included in Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC for product type 8 and may thus be authorised by Member States for use in wood preservatives subject to specific conditions.
Snov flufenoksuron ni bila odobrena kot aktivna snov na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 ter ni bila vključena kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I, IA ali IB k Direktivi 98/8/ES za 18. vrsto izdelkov, zato je uporaba flufenoksurona kot pesticida strogo omejena in bi ga bilo treba dodati na seznama kemikalij iz delov 1 in 2 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 689/2008, saj je uporaba flufenoksurona prepovedana za skoraj vse vrste uporabe, čeprav je bil flufenoksuron vključen v Prilogo I k Direktivi 98/8/ES za 8. vrsto izdelkov in bi ga tako lahko države članice pod posebnimi pogoji odobrile za uporabo v pripravkih za zaščito lesa.
The addition of flufenoxuron to Annex I was suspended due to a new application for inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC submitted pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
Vključitev flufenoksurona v Prilogo I je bila začasno odložena, ker je bil v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 predložen nov zahtevek za vključitev v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
That new application resulted again in the decision not to approve flufenoxuron as active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 with the effect that the reason for suspending the addition to Annex I disappeared.
Tudi na podlagi tega novega zahtevka je bilo sklenjeno, da se flufenoksuron ne odobri kot aktivna snov na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, zaradi česar razloga za začasno odložitev njegove vključitve v Prilogo I ni več.
Therefore, the substance flufenoxuron should be added to the lists of chemicals contained in Parts 1 and 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008.
Snov flufenoksuron bi bilo zato treba dodati na seznama kemikalij iz delov 1 in 2 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 689/2008.