natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Believes that the forthcoming review of the EEAS is the forum where a detailed analysis can be made of the compatibility between the resources available and the functions to be carried out by the EEAS and any changes required to ensure the highest level of efficiency in its operations;
meni, da je prihodnji pregled ESZD priložnost za natančno analizo združljivosti razpoložljivih sredstev in nalog, ki jih mora izvajati ESZD, z morebitnimi spremembami, potrebnimi za zagotovitev najvišje ravni učinkovitosti dejavnosti;
believes that an evaluation of property in use by the EEAS should involve comparisons with other diplomatic missions in the same location rather than between EEAS facilities in very different countries;
meni, da mora ocena sredstev, ki jih uporablja ESZD, vključevati primerjave z drugimi diplomatskimi misijami na isti lokaciji namesto primerjav med misijami ESZD v zelo različnih državah;
believes that, in evaluating the price of property, contracts should be actively monitored in relation to the benefit accruing to the Union and that changes should be made where necessary;
meni, da bi bilo treba pri ocenjevanju cene posestva aktivno spremljati pogodbe, upoštevati skupno korist za Unijo ter po potrebi opraviti spremembe;
considers that, in this evaluation, it should be made clear whether the property is used for purposes other than housing, and stipulated which part of the property is being used and for how long and how;
meni, da bi bilo treba pri tem ocenjevanju pojasniti, ali se posest poleg bivanja uporablja še v druge namene, in navesti, kateri del posesti se uporablja ter kako dolgo in na kakšen način;
believes also that there should not be any differences between housing which should be similar, without abuses occurring, so that the quality of life as regards housing is similar from one region to another, depending on the availability and cost of the properties;
meni tudi, da ne bi smelo biti razlik med bivališči, ki bi si morala biti podobna, prav tako pa ne bi smelo prihajati do zlorab, tako da bi bila kakovost življenja med regijami podobna, in sicer odvisno od razpoložljivosti in cene nepremičnin;
calls for a multiannual plan to be submitted for Union buildings and staff safety and building security in all third countries with Union delegations;
poziva k pripravi večletnega načrta za stavbe Unije ter varnost uslužbencev in poslopij v vseh državah nečlanicah, kjer so delegacije Unije;
Calls on the EEAS to identify and consider, in accordance with its political and contractual obligations, every possible option for making major savings in the long term so as to ensure that the variation in its annual budget — the increase in which, for legitimate reasons, is proportionally greater than that of the other institutions’ budgets — can have a multiplier effect;
poziva ESZD, naj v skladu s svojimi političnimi in pogodbenimi dolžnostmi opredeli in preuči vse morebitne možnosti za znatne dolgoročne prihranke, da bo imelo odstopanje letnega proračuna, ki se je iz upravičenih razlogov povečal bolj kot pri drugih institucijah, multiplikacijski učinek;
Draws attention to the need to guarantee a comprehensive security check for local agents in the delegations;
opozarja, da je treba poskrbeti za celovit varnostni pregled lokalnih uslužbencev;
Strongly supports the EEAS’s ‘smart savings initiative’;
odločno podpira pobudo ESZD za pametno varčevanje;
asks the EEAS to provide an implementing report which shows the financial results and how this saved money was reused;
poziva ESZD, naj predloži poročilo o izvajanju, ki razkriva finančne rezultate in to, kako je bil prihranjeni denar ponovno uporabljen;
requests the Commission to also adopt that initiative;
poziva Komisijo, naj tudi sama sprejme to pobudo;
Notes the high frequency of travel among Union delegation staff to headquarters with various purposes;
opozarja na pogostost potovanj uslužbencev delegacij Unije na sedež iz različnih razlogov;
regrets that it is not possible to have an independent inspection authority to evaluate the necessity of those official journeys;
obžaluje, da ni mogoče uvesti neodvisnega nadzornega organa, ki bi ocenil, ali so ta službena potovanja potrebna;
requests that the High Representative take this into consideration and report to Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control on that matter;
zahteva, da to vprašanje preuči visoka predstavnica in poroča parlamentarnemu Odboru za proračunski nadzor;
calls for a study to be drawn up on the subject of frequent travel by Union delegation staff assessing the feasibility of introducing videoconferencing in order to reduce travel costs and the amount of time spent by staff travelling;
poziva k izvedbi študije o pogostih službenih potovanjih uslužbencev delegacij Unije, v kateri bo ocenjeno, ali bi bilo mogoče z videokonferencami zmanjšati potne stroške in skrajšati čas, ki ga zaposleni porabijo za pot;
Welcomes the savings already made by using innovative solutions like videoconferencing for job interviews;
pozdravlja že ustvarjene prihranke z inovativnimi rešitvami, kot je uporaba videokonferenc za zaposlitvene razgovore;
calls on the EEAS to come up, as much as possible, with similar proposals also for the training of staff;
poziva ESZD, naj oblikuje čim več podobnih predlogov tudi za usposabljanje uslužbencev;
Strongly urges the EEAS, in regard to the travel arrangements of its delegations to its headquarters, to adopt practices similar to those applied by Member States in comparable circumstances;
odločno poziva ESZD, naj v zvezi s službenimi potovanji svojih delegacij na sedež sprejme pravila, podobna tistim, ki jih uporabljajo države članice v primerljivih razmerah;
insists that, with regard to flights, the EEAS bring itself into line with Member State practices;
zahteva, da se ESZD pri poletih prilagodi navadam držav članic;
Welcomes the establishment of a working group that examined ways to improve the working methods at its headquarters and the fact that conclusions have already been implemented;
pozdravlja ustanovitev delovne skupine, ki je preučila načine za izboljšanje delovnih metod na sedežu, in dejstvo, da so bile ugotovitve že vpeljane v prakso;
asks to be informed of those conclusions and of the performance improvements achieved;
poziva ESZD, naj ga obvesti o teh ugotovitvah in o doseženem izboljšanju uspešnosti;
Takes the view that some of the indicators analysed in the self-assessment of internal control standards would need to be revised or updated;
meni, da bi bilo treba nekatere kazalnike, analizirane v okviru samoocene standardov notranje kontrole, popraviti ali posodobiti;
Considers that the statistics in the annual activity report, especially in relation to data on delegations, are not sufficiently accurate;
meni, da statistični podatki v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih, zlasti podatki o delegacijah, niso dovolj natančni;
calls on the EEAS to improve its performance by establishing key performance indicators that will give some continuity to the evaluation of the performance of the delegations;
poziva ESZD, naj izboljša svojo uspešnost z določitvijo ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti, ki bodo zagotovili nadaljnje ocenjevanje uspešnosti delegacij;
calls on the High Representative to report to the Committee on Budgetary Control in this connection;
poziva visoko predstavnico, naj Odboru za proračunski nadzor posreduje poročilo v zvezi s tem;
Welcomes that the EEAS committed itself to full cooperation with the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and is finalising a specific Memorandum of Understanding with the OLAF to elevate their cooperation to a higher level;
je zadovoljen, da se je ESZD zavezala tesno sodelovati z Evropskim uradom za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) in da dokončuje pripravo posebnega memoranduma o soglasju z OLAF, da bi poglobila medsebojno sodelovanje;
Is of the opinion that improvements need to be made on the quality of the financial and administrative management of the Union delegations and in certain headquarters’ divisions that were not identified in the annual activity report;
meni, da je treba izboljšati kakovost finančnega in upravnega poslovanja delegacij Unije ter nekaterih oddelkov sedeža, ki niso bili opredeljeni v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih;
expects that next year’s report will identify those divisions and report on progresses made;
pričakuje, da bo poročilo za naslednje leto opredelilo te oddelke in razkrilo doseženi napredek;
Calls on the EEAS to submit comprehensive details on how its internal control and supervision mechanism works as regards the management of funds and expenditure;
poziva ESZD, naj posreduje izčrpne podatke o tem, kako učinkoviti so notranja kontrola in nadzorni mehanizmi pri upravljanju sredstev in odhodkov;
also calls on the EEAS to explain its policy on Parliament’s access to internal inspection reports;
poziva ESZD, naj pojasni svojo politiko o vpogledu Parlamenta v notranja inšpekcijska poročila;
Points out that a number of EEAS delegations operate in a high risk environment in terms of corruption and fraud;
poudarja, da številne delegacije ESZD delujejo v izjemno tveganih okoliščinah, kar zadeva korupcijo in goljufije;
believes that it is pivotal to the protection of the Union’s financial interests that EEAS staff receives the appropriate training and awareness building in order to detect any misconduct;
meni, da je treba za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije uslužbencem ESZD ponuditi ustrezno usposabljanje in ozaveščanje, da se odkrijejo primeri nepravilnega ravnanja;
believes that a comprehensive whistleblower policy is essential to the protection of the Union’s financial interests;
meni, da je celovita politika notranjih informatorjev bistvena za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije;
Considers that budget support systems for third country governments are not properly audited and calls for a better scrutiny of the financial operations at an earlier stage;
meni, da revizija sistemov proračunske podpore za vlade držav nečlanic ni ustrezna, in poziva k učinkovitejšemu nadzoru finančnega poslovanja že v zgodnji fazi;
insists that an independent national audit body must be an ultimate condition for granting budget support;
vztraja, da mora biti mnenje neodvisnega nacionalnega revizijskega organa končni pogoj za odobritev proračunske podpore;
Reminds the EEAS of the responsibility to deliver concrete results and emphasises the reciprocity between deliverables and the overall budget.
opozarja ESZD, da je odgovorna za doseganje konkretnih rezultatov, in poudarja povezave med rezultati in celotnim proračunom.
See also the recommendations set out in Court of Auditors Special Report No 18/2012, ‘European Union assistance to Kosovo related to the rule of law’.
Glej tudi priporočila iz posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča št. 18/2012 o pomoči Evropske unije Kosovu v zvezi s pravno državo.
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2011
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev za proračunsko leto 2011
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2011,
ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev za proračunsko leto 2011,
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2011, together with the Agency’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 12 February 2013 (05753/2013 — C7-0041/2013),
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev za proračunsko leto 2011 z odgovori Agencije [1],ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 12. februarja 2013 (05753/2013 – C7-0041/2013),
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2], and in particular Article 185 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators [4], and in particular Article 24 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Article 94 thereof,having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], zlasti člena 185,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 713/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o ustanovitvi Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev [4], zlasti člena 24,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], zlasti člena 94,ob upoštevanju člena 77 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0068/2013),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0068/2013),
Grants the Director of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2011;
podeli razrešnico direktorju Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev glede izvrševanja proračuna agencije za proračunsko leto 2011;
Instructs its President to forward this Decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the Director of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in resolucijo, ki je del sklepa, posreduje direktorju Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
OJ C 388, 15.12.2012, p. 1.
UL C 388, 15.12.2012, str. 1.
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators for the financial year 2011
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev za proračunsko leto 2011
A. whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (‘the Agency’) for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular,
A. ker je Računsko sodišče navedlo, da je prejelo razumno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti letnih računovodskih izkazov Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev (v nadaljevanju: agencija) za proračunsko leto 2011 ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij,
B. whereas the Agency moved from Brussels to its seat in Ljubljana, Slovenia, on 1 February 2011, officially started its activities on 3 March 2011, and achieved financial autonomy on 8 March 2011,
B. ker se je agencija 1. februarja 2011 iz Bruslja preselila na svoj sedež v Ljubljani (Slovenija), 3. marca 2011 je uradno začela s svojim delom, 8. marca 2011 pa je postala finančno neodvisna,
C. whereas the overall budget of the Agency for 2011 was EUR 4792345;
C. ker je skupni proračun agencije v letu 2011 znašal 4792345 EUR;
whereas the contribution of the Union to the budget of the Agency for 2011 amounted to EUR 4362607,98 [6],
ker je bil v letu 2011 prispevek Unije k proračunu agencije 4362607,98 [6] EUR,
Budgetary and financial management
Upravljanje proračuna in finančno poslovodenje
Recalls that the initial Union contribution was EUR 4362607,98 in 2011;
opozarja, da je bil prvotni prispevek Unije v letu 2011 4362607,98 EUR;
notes that this was the first year that the Agency was financially autonomous;
opozarja, da je bilo to prvo leto finančne neodvisnosti agencije;
Observes from the annual accounts that the Agency’s initial 2011 budget amounted to EUR 5119000 (including EUR 119000 for the European Free Trade Association contribution);
iz letnih računovodskih izkazov ugotavlja, da je začetni proračun agencije za leto 2011 znašal 5119000 EUR (vključno s prispevkom za Evropsko združenje za prosto trgovino v višini 119000 EUR);
Establishes from the annual accounts that appropriations were committed at a rate of 67 %, while payments reached a level of 74 % of the total appropriations managed;
na podlagi letnih računovodskih izkazov ugotavlja, da je bila stopnja prevzetih obveznosti 67-odstotna, plačila pa so dosegla 74-odstotno stopnjo vseh upravljanih proračunskih sredstev;
Carry-over appropriations
Prenos proračunskih sredstev
Notes with concern the Court of Auditors’ observation that the high level of appropriations not used and carry-overs, as well as the low level of payments, indicate shortcomings in budget planning and implementation and are at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality;
z zaskrbljenostjo se seznanja z ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča, da visoka stopnja neporabljenih odobrenih proračunskih sredstev in prenosov ter nizka stopnja plačil kažeta na pomanjkljivosti v načrtovanju in izvrševanju proračuna in sta v nasprotju s proračunskim načelom enoletnosti;
Accepts the Agency’s explanation that during its first operational year, it had to recruit most of its staff, which resulted in the delayed commencement of opened positions, thus having a significant impact on the Agency’s budget implementation rate, as well as estimations of procurement needs, which led to a concentration of procurement procedures towards the end of the year;
sprejema pojasnilo agencije, da je med prvim letom delovanja morala zaposliti večino svojega osebja, kar je upočasnilo zapolnitev prostih delovnih mest in je imelo znaten vpliv na stopnjo izvrševanja proračuna agencije, kot tudi na ocenjevanje potreb po javnih naročilih, to pa je povzročilo zgostitev postopkov javnih naročil ob koncu leta;
understands that this, in turn, resulted in a high level of carry-forwards in order to honour the signed legal and budgetary commitments;
razume, da je to posledično povzročilo visoko stopnjo prenosov v naslednje obdobje, saj je bilo treba spoštovati podpisane pravne in proračunske zaveze;
Takes note of the Agency’s statement that it is now in a much better position to implement its assigned tasks and the corresponding budget, and requires it to follow up this issue, and to report on it to the discharge authority;
je seznanjen z izjavo agencije, da je sedaj v veliko boljšem položaju za izvajanje dodeljenih nalog in izvrševanje ustreznega proračuna, od nje pa zahteva, da spremlja to zadevo in o njej poroča organu za podelitev razrešnice;
Irregular payments
Nepravilna plačila
Notes with concern that in 2011, the Agency paid subsistence allowances amounting to EUR 10839 to seconded experts who were nationals of the State where the Agency is situated, and that those payments conflicted with the Rules on the Secondment of National Experts adopted by the Administrative Board of the Agency, which provide for the granting of such allowances only to temporary agents who are not nationals of the Member State where they are employed;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je agencija v letu 2011 izplačala za 10839 EUR nadomestil napotenim strokovnjakom, ki so državljani države, v kateri je sedež agencije, in da so ta plačila v nasprotju s pravili za napotene nacionalne strokovnjake, ki jih je sprejel upravni odbor agencije, v katerih je določeno, da se takšna nadomestila dodelijo samo začasnim uslužbencem, ki niso državljani države članice, v kateri so zaposleni;
Notes that the Agency had already stopped the payment of allowances in such cases;
ugotavlja, da je agencija že prenehala s plačevanjem nadomestil v takih primerih;
nevertheless, given the irregular nature of those payments, requests the Agency to follow up the issue, to explore the possibilities to recover the subsistence allowances unduly paid, and to report on this issue to the discharge authority;
vendar pa zaradi nepravilnosti teh plačil od agencije zahteva, da spremlja to zadevo, preuči možnosti za vračilo neupravičeno izplačanih nadomestil in poroča o tej zadevi organu za podelitev razrešnice;
Recruitment procedures
Postopki zaposlovanja
Notes the observation of the Court of Auditors that there is room to improve the transparency of recruitment procedures;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča o tem, da bi se lahko povečala preglednost postopkov zaposlovanja;
requests that the Agency follow up this issue and report on actions taken to the discharge authority;
od agencije zahteva, da spremlja to zadevo in o sprejetih ukrepih poroča organu za podelitev razrešnice;
considers that some of the provisions of the Staff Regulations may present a considerable administrative burden;
meni, da lahko nekatere določbe kadrovskih predpisov pomenijo veliko upravno breme;
therefore encourages the Commission to allow for a certain degree of simplification under Article 110 of the Staff Regulations in regard to the agencies;
zato spodbuja Komisijo, naj v okviru člena 110 Kadrovskih predpisov omogoči določeno stopnjo poenostavitve glede agencij;
Points out that although the recruitment of permanent staff has now been concluded, the Agency is short of capacity in terms of seconded national experts, and that doubts remain about the technical competence of some of the staff, potentially generating uncertainty around the Agency’s work;
poudarja, da čeprav je zaposlovanje stalnega osebja sedaj zaključeno, pa agenciji primanjkujejo nacionalni napoteni strokovnjaki; poudarja, da obstajajo dvomi glede strokovne usposobljenosti nekaterih uslužbencev, kar pa lahko povzroči negotovost glede dela agencije;
requests that the Agency follow up this issue and report to the discharge authority on actions taken;
zahteva, da agencija spremlja to vprašanje in o sprejetih ukrepih poroča organu za podelitev razrešnice;
Urges the Agency to improve its cooperation with national regulators, particularly in order to ensure that its work is organised according to efficient principles and to establish a permanent headquarters, thus allowing both the Agency and national regulators to make substantial savings and to resolve the incipient problems of transport and limited resources;
poziva agencijo, naj izboljša svoje sodelovanje z nacionalnimi regulatorji, zlasti da zagotovi, da bo njeno delo organizirano v skladu z načeli o učinkovitosti, in naj vzpostavi stalni sedež ter tako agenciji in nacionalnim regulatorjem omogoči znatne prihranke ter razreši začetne težave, povezane s prevozom in omejenimi sredstvi;
Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a horizontal nature, to its Resolution of 17 April 2013 [7] on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
sporoča, da so druge pripombe k sklepu o razrešnici, ki so horizontalne narave, zbrane v resoluciji z dne 17. aprila 2013 [7] o uspešnosti, finančnem poslovodenju in nadzoru agencij.
ACER Annual Activity report 2011, p. 85-91.
Letno poročilo o dejavnostih Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev (ACER) za leto 2011, str. 85–91.