natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the exporter provided no factual reasoning as to why the request would be unfounded.
Poleg tega izvoznik ni dal nobene z dejstvi podprte razlage, zakaj naj zahtevek ne bi bil utemeljen.
It is also noted that, based on the information collected during the investigation, imports of soy protein concentrates for animal feed account for less then 1 % of the total Chinese imports in the Union of the product under investigation (as originally defined).
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da na podlagi v preiskavi zbranih informacij uvoz koncentriranih sojinih beljakovin za krmo predstavlja manj kot 1 % celotnega kitajskega uvoza izdelka v preiskavi (kot je bil prvotno opredeljen) v Unijo.
Given the above, and in particular the clear technical, chemical and market related differences, it is considered appropriate to limit the product scope by excluding simple soy protein concentrates of a kind used in animal feeding.
Glede na navedeno in zlasti glede na jasne tehnične, kemične in s trgom povezane razlike se zdi primerno, da se obseg izdelka omeji z izključitvijo enostavnih koncentriranih sojinih beljakovin, ki se uporabljajo v krmi.
Consequently, the product concerned is concentrated soy protein products, excluding such products of a kind used in animal feeding, and containing by weight 65 % or more of proteins (N × 6,25) calculated on the dry matter by excluding added vitamins, minerals, amino acids and food additives, originating in the PRC (‘the product concerned’ or ‘CCSPP’) and currently falling within CN codes ex21061020, ex21069092 and ex35040090.
Zato zadevni izdelek zajema proizvode iz koncentriranih sojinih beljakovin, razen proizvodov za uporabo v krmi, ki vsebujejo najmanj 65 mas. % beljakovin (N × 6,25), računano na suho snov in brez upoštevanja dodanih vitaminov, mineralov, aminokislin in aditivov za živila („zadevni izdelek“), ter ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex21061020, ex21069092 in ex35040090
The product concerned is mainly used in the food industry in meat applications and meat substitutes.
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja predvsem v živilski industriji v mesnih izdelkih in mesnih nadomestkih.
Other food applications include salad dressings, soups, beverage powders, energy bars, non-dairy creamers, frozen desserts, whipped toppings, infant formulas, breads, breakfast cereals, pastas etc. Due to its functionalities, the product concerned also has some specific applications including adhesives, asphalts, resins, cleaning materials, cosmetics, inks, leather, paints, paper coatings, pesticides/fungicides, plastics, polyesters and textile fibres.
Druge uporabe v živilih vključujejo solatne prelive, juhe, napitke v prahu, energijske ploščice, nadomestke za mlečne izdelke, zamrznjene sladice, stepene prelive, začetne formule, kruh, žitne kosmiče, testenine itd. Zadevni izdelek ima zaradi svoje funkcionalnosti tudi nekatere posebne uporabe, vključno v lepilih, asfaltu, smolah, čistilih, kozmetičnih sredstvih, črnilu, usnju, barvah, premazih za papir, pesticidih/fungicidih, plastiki, poliestrih in tekstilnih vlaknih.
Despite some differences in possible final applications, the different types of the product concerned, concentrates and isolates, all share the same basic physical and chemical characteristics.
Kljub nekaterim razlikam pri morebitni končni uporabi imajo vse različne vrste zadevnega izdelka, koncentrati in izolati, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti.
The product concerned and certain concentrated soy protein products produced and sold on the domestic market of the PRC, and on the domestic market of Brazil, which served as an analogue country, as well as certain concentrated soy protein products produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry were found to have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses.
V zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in nekaterimi proizvodi iz koncentriranih sojinih beljakovin, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo na domačem trgu LRK ter na domačem trgu Brazilije, ki je bila uporabljena kot primerljiva država, ter nekaterimi proizvodi iz koncentriranih sojinih beljakovin, ki jih v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SINOGLORY GROUP AND GUSHEN GROUP
POVEZAVA MED SKUPINO SINOGLORY IN SKUPINO GUSHEN
The sampled exporting producers consisted of Shandong Crown Soya Protein Co. Ltd and its related companies (‘Crown Group’), Gushen Biological Technology Group Co. Ltd and its related companies (‘Gushen Group’) and Sinoglory Health Food Co. Ltd and its related companies (‘Sinoglory Group’).
Vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki so iz družbe Shandong Crown Soya Protein Co. Ltd. in njenih povezanih družb („skupina Crown“), družbe Gushen Biological Technology Group Co. Ltd. in njenih povezanih družb („skupina Gushen“) ter družbe Sinoglory Health Food Co. Ltd. in njenih povezanih družb („skupina Sinoglory“).
At an early stage of the investigation it was considered that Gushen Group and Sinoglory Group might have to be treated as related exporters.
V zgodnji fazi preiskave je veljalo, da je skupino Gushen in skupino Sinoglory morda treba obravnavati kot povezana izvoznika.
However, following the explanations provided by the exporters concerned, it was finally decided to consider Gushen Group and Sinoglory Group as separate entities for the purpose of this investigation.
Vendar je bilo po prejetju pojasnil, ki sta jih zagotovila zadevna izvoznika, dokončno odločeno, da se skupina Gushen in skupina Sinoglory za namene te preiskave štejeta za ločena subjekta.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki od 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
There are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system;
večjih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva, ni;
Legal certainty and stability is provided by bankruptcy and property laws; and
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata pravno varnost in stabilnost; ter
MET was claimed by the Crown Group and the Sinoglory Group.
TGO sta zahtevali skupina Crown in skupina Sinoglory.
For both the Crown and the Sinoglory Groups, the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified the information submitted in the MET claim forms and all other information deemed necessary, at the premises of the companies in question.
Komisija je zbrala vse potrebne informacije o skupinah Crown in Sinoglory ter po presoji preverila informacije, navedene v zahtevku za TGO, in vse druge informacije v prostorih zadevnih družb.
The investigation established that both groups did not meet the requirements of the criteria set forth in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation to be granted MET.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da nobena od skupin ne izpolnjuje meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, da bi jima bila odobrena TGO.
In particular, the companies from both groups failed to meet criteria 1, 2, and 3.
Družbe iz obeh skupin zlasti niso izpolnile meril 1, 2 in 3.
FIRST GROUP
PRVA SKUPINA
In the case of one group, one producer in the group did not meet criterion 1 because of the existence of an obligation to sell all its products on the international market.
En proizvajalec iz prve skupine ni izpolnil merila 1, v skladu s katerim je treba vse izdelke prodati na mednarodnem trgu.
Even though the company claimed that this provision was not binding, the company actually has never sold on the domestic market (with the exception of a minor sale in 2007).
Čeprav je družba trdila, da ta določba ni zavezujoča, dejansko ni nikoli prodajala na domačem trgu (razen manjše prodaje leta 2007).
As for criterion 2, several accounting problems were found for both producers in the group.
V zvezi z merilom 2 je bilo pri obeh proizvajalcih iz skupine odkritih več računovodskih težav.
Moreover, one of the companies in the group did not submit any MET claim form.
Poleg tega ena družba iz skupine ni predložila obrazca zahtevka za TGO.
Furthermore, one company in the group let out part of its land without any record of the rental receipts in its accounts since no invoices or proofs of payment for these payments were issued.
Nadalje je ena družba iz skupine oddajala del svojega zemljišča, pri čemer v njenih računovodskih izkazih ni evidence o teh prihodkih, ker niso bili izdani nobeni računi ali potrdila o plačilu.
When it moved to a new production site and part of its equipment became idle, no test for impairment was made.
Ko se je preselila v nove proizvodne prostore in del njene opreme ni bil več v uporabi, ni bil opravljen test nastale amortizacije.
Finally, when one of the companies in the group bought a new piece of land, it received a government transfer to be used as compensation for the villagers who had to move.
In ko je ena od družb iz skupine kupila novo zemljišče, je prejela vladno podporo za odškodnino za vaščane, ki so se morali preseliti.
However, this payment was not used for that purpose but to reduce the cost of the land use right.
Vendar to plačilo ni bilo uporabljeno za navedeni namen, ampak za zmanjšanje stroškov pravice do uporabe zemljišča.
Regarding criterion 3, the two producers in the group swap raw material from a common supplier without any proper documentation or records, on the basis of very informal arrangements without any adjustments for price differences or fees: this constitutes a form of barter trade.
V zvezi z merilom 3 sta dva proizvajalca iz skupine izmenjala surovine od skupnega dobavitelja brez ustrezne dokumentacije ali evidence na podlagi zelo neuradnih dogovorov brez kakršnih koli prilagoditev zaradi cenovnih razlik ali pristojbin, kar je oblika menjalnega posla.
Furthermore, one producer could use the land belonging to its majority shareholder without any payments for several years.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec lahko več let brez plačila koristil zemljišče v lasti večinskega lastnika.
According to that company, this was possible because the related land use rights had been acquired for a very low price by the parent company in the context of its privatisation.
Po navedbah navedene družbe je bilo to mogoče, ker je matična družba v okviru privatizacije kupila povezane pravice do uporabe zemljišč po zelo nizki ceni.
Following disclosure of the detailed MET findings and the interim disclosure, the group reiterated earlier claims that one of the two producers should not be considered as legally related to the rest of the group.
Po razkritju podrobnih ugotovitev TGO in po vmesnem razkritju je skupina ponovila svoje prejšnje trditve, da enega od obeh proizvajalcev ne bi smeli šteti kot pravno povezanega s preostalim delom skupine.
However, concerning this claim, it was found that the two producers were pursuing a coordinated commercial and industrial strategy together with the rest of the group, including the barter trade practices mentioned at recital 48 above.
Vendar je bilo v zvezi s to trditvijo ugotovljeno, da sta oba proizvajalca sledila usklajeni trgovski in industrijski strategiji skupaj s preostalim delom skupine, vključno s prakso menjalnega posla iz uvodne izjave 48.
The group also claimed that the sales restriction for one of its producers was only mentioned in its Articles of Association, and not in the business license or certificate of approval.
Skupina je tudi trdila, da je bila omejitev prodaje za enega od njenih proizvajalcev navedena samo v statutu združenja in ne v obrtnem dovoljenju ali potrdilu o ustreznosti.
According to the company, the restriction was therefore not binding.
Po mnenju družbe omejitev zato ni bila zavezujoča.
Moreover, it was claimed that the company which had not submitted a MET claim form was not a producing or trading company but rather a payment agent and that the group had applied its best efforts to provide all information available.
Poleg tega je zagotavljala, da družba, ki ni predložila obrazca zahtevka za TGO, ni bila proizvodna ali trgovska družba ampak plačilni zastopnik, ter da se je skupina na vso moč prizadevala zagotoviti vse razpoložljive informacije.
However, as mentioned above, the producer in question clearly complied with the sales restriction.
Vendar se je zadevni proizvajalec, kot navedeno, natančno držal omejitve prodaje.
Moreover, the Articles of Association are part of the documents that are submitted for approval to the authorities when the company is set up and therefore it is clear that the content of these documents forms the basis for the actual operations of the company.
Poleg tega je statut združenja del dokumentacije, predložene organom za odobritev ob ustanovitvi družbe, zato je očitno, da je vsebina teh dokumentov osnova za dejansko delovanje družbe.
Finally, concerning the company which did not submit a MET claim form, this company was actually found to be involved in certain aspects relating to the export sales of the product in question and should have therefore submitted a MET claim form.
V zvezi z družbo, ki ni predložila obrazca zahtevka za TGO, je bilo nazadnje dejansko ugotovljeno, da je bila vpletena v nekatere vidike izvoza zadevnega izdelka, in bi zato morala predložiti obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
Therefore, both claims are rejected.
Obe trditvi se zato zavrneta.
SECOND GROUP
DRUGA SKUPINA
In the case of the other group, one of the exporting producers was also subject to a limitation of its sales, whereby 70 % of its production should be sold for export, and therefore did not comply with criterion 1.
Za enega proizvajalca izvoznika iz druge skupine je tudi veljala omejitev prodaje, saj naj bi se 70 % njegove proizvodnje prodalo za izvoz, zaradi česar ni bilo izpolnjeno merilo 1.
As for criterion 2, a number of problems concerning depreciation of assets and changes in accounting policies were found.
Glede merila 2 so bile ugotovljene številne težave v zvezi z amortizacijo sredstev in spremembami računovodskih usmeritev.
As for criterion 3, the value attributed to two plots of land in one of the companies’ accounts varies significantly, and it is considered that by acquiring a plot of land at a price clearly below market value, the company received a hidden subsidy.
Kar zadeva merilo 3, se vrednost, pripisana dvema zemljiščema v računovodskih izkazih ene od družb, znatno razlikuje in predvideva se, da je družba z nakupom zemljišča po ceni, ki je očitno pod tržno vrednostjo, prejela prikrito subvencijo.
Moreover, another company in the group benefited from free rental of a piece of land for one year and has acquired land use rights at a price lower than the market value.
Poleg tega je druga družba iz skupine eno leto brezplačno najemala zemljišče in kupila pravice do uporabe zemljišča po ceni, nižji od tržne vrednosti.
Finally a number of intra-group guarantees were not disclosed in the notes to the accounts, in violation of IAS 24.
V opombah k računovodskim izkazom tudi ni bilo razkritih več jamstev znotraj skupine v nasprotju z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi MRS št. 24.
Following disclosure of the detailed MET findings and the interim disclosure, the group claimed that de facto sales of the two producers were not subject to any sales restriction.
Po razkritju podrobnih ugotovitev TGO in vmesnem razkritju je skupina trdila, da za prodajo obeh proizvajalcev dejansko ni veljala nobena omejitev.
According to the companies, the fact that their respective export volumes were in line with the restrictions in their Articles of Association was only due to the supply-demand balance on the soy protein market.
Družbi sta trdili, da je bil obseg njunega izvoza v skladu z omejitvami iz statuta združenja zgolj zaradi ravnotežja med ponudbo in povpraševanjem na trgu sojinih beljakovin.
They underlined that these restrictive provisions had been removed from these texts soon after the IP.
Poudarili sta, da so se te omejujoče določbe kmalu po OP črtale iz teh besedil.
Moreover, regarding criterion 2, the group claimed that apart from minor accounting mistakes, it had fully complied with Chinese GAAP which they are required to implement rather than IAS.
Poleg tega je skupina v zvezi z merilom 2 trdila, da je razen manjših računovodskih napak v celoti upoštevala kitajska splošno sprejeta računovodska načela, ki se jih morajo bolj držati kot mednarodnih računovodskih standardov.
With respect to the land use rights, the group claimed that the different value of the two plots of land was due to the levelling costs of one of the two plots.
Skupina je v zvezi s pravicami do uporabe zemljišč trdila, da je razlika v vrednosti obeh zemljišč nastala zaradi izravnalnih stroškov enega od zemljišč.
Finally, it was stressed that the free rental of another plot of land was due to some administrative delays before the land use right could actually be acquired and that, anyhow, the value of the exemption was only minor if compared to the company’s operational income.
Nazadnje je poudarila, da je eno zemljišče vzela v najem brezplačno zaradi upravnih zamud, preden je bilo dejansko mogoče kupiti pravico do uporabe zemljišča, ter da je bila v vsakem primeru vrednost izvzetja majhna v primerjavi s prihodki iz poslovanja družbe.
Regarding criterion 1, the Articles of Association are part of the documents that are submitted to the authorities and approved when the company is set up.
Kar zadeva merilo 1, je statut združenja del dokumentacije, ki je predložena organom in odobrena ob ustanovitvi družbe.
The fact that the company complied with the sales restrictions is considered to be due to a requirement to do so and it is clear that the content of these documents forms the basis for the actual operations of the company.
Predvideva se, da se je družba držala prodajnih omejitev, ker se je tako od nje zahtevalo, in jasno je, da je vsebina teh dokumentov osnova za dejansko delovanje družbe.
Moreover it is underlined that the removal of the restrictions from the Article of Association took place after the IP and is therefore irrelevant for this investigation.
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da so se omejitve iz statuta združenja črtale po OP, zato niso relevantne za to preiskavo.
Regarding criterion 2, it was clear that the accuracy and reliability of the records could not be confirmed.
V zvezi z merilom 2 je bilo jasno, da natančnosti in zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ni bilo mogoče potrditi.
In addition, the company’s accounting records should be audited in line with international accounting standards which could not be confirmed during the verification.
Poleg tega bi računovodski izkazi morali biti revidirani v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, kar med preveritvijo ni bilo mogoče potrditi.
With respect to criterion 3, no evidence could be submitted during the on-the-spot verification in order to substantiate the levelling costs for the plot of land in question.
V zvezi z merilom 3 niso bila predložena nobena dokazila med preveritvami na kraju samem, ki bi potrdila izravnalne stroške za zadevno zemljišče.
Finally, independently of the explanations brought forward, the fact remains that one of the companies rented its land for free during a certain period of time and therefore benefited from a subsidy.
Nazadnje ne glede na zagotovljena pojasnila ostaja dejstvo, da je ena od družb določeno obdobje najemala zemljišče brezplačno, in je torej prejela subvencijo.
The comments were therefore not of a nature to change the MET findings.
Pripombe torej niso spremenile ugotovitev TGO.
Those findings are hereby confirmed.
Navedene ugotovitve so s tem potrjene.
INDIVIDUAL TREATMENT (IT)
INDIVIDUALNA OBRAVNAVA („IO“)
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, a country-wide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, ki jih zajema navedeni člen, po potrebi uvede dajatev na ravni države, razen kadar lahko družbe dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out below:
Ta merila so le zaradi lažjega sklicevanja na kratko povzeta spodaj:
in the case of wholly or partly foreign owned firms or joint ventures, exporters are free to repatriate capital and profits,
v primeru podjetij ali skupnih podjetij, ki so v celoti ali deloma v tuji lasti, lahko izvozniki svobodno vrnejo kapital in dobičke v domovino,
export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sale are freely determined,
izvozne cene in obseg izvoza ter prodajni pogoji se svobodno določajo,
the majority of the shares belong to private persons.
večina delnic je v lasti zasebnikov.
exchange rate conversions are carried out at the market rate, and
pretvorbe menjalnega tečaja se opravljajo po tržni stopnji ter
The Gushen Group only claimed IT.
Skupina Gushen je zahtevala samo IO.
This claim was examined and no element was found to indicate that the company did not comply with the abovementioned criteria.
Ta zahtevek je bil preučen in odkrit ni bil noben element, ki bi kazal, da ta družba ni izpolnila zgoraj navedenih meril.
It was therefore concluded that Gushen Group could be granted IT.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se skupini Gushen lahko odobri IO.
Assessment was also made for the Crown Group and Sinoglory Group, since MET was not granted to these companies.
Ocenjeni sta bili tudi skupina Crown in skupina Sinoglory, ker tem družbam TGO ni bil odobren.
In both cases, no element was found to indicate that the companies did not comply with the abovementioned criteria.
V obeh primerih ni bil odkrit noben element, ki bi kazal, da družbe niso izpolnile zgoraj navedenih meril.
It is therefore concluded that both company groups could be granted IT.
Zato se sklene, da se obema skupinama družb lahko odobri IO.
Following the final disclosure, the complainant expressed its disagreement with the granting of IT to the sampled exporter groups.
Po dokončnem razkritju je pritožnik izrazil svoje nestrinjanje z odobritvijo IO vzorčenim skupinam izvoznikov.
However, in view of the non-imposition of measures it has not been necessary to examine this further.
Vendar tega vprašanja ni bilo treba nadalje obravnavati, ker niso bili uvedeni nobeni ukrepi.
As explained in recital 46, MET was not granted to the two sampled groups that had requested it.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 46, TGO ni bila odobrena dvema vzorčenima skupinama, ki sta zaprosili zanjo.
The third sampled group had not applied for MET.
Tretja vzorčena skupina ni vložila zahtevka za TGO.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, normal value for all groups was established on the basis of the prices or constructed value in an analogue country.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost za vse družbe določena na podlagi cen ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the notice of initiation, the Commission indicated its intention to use the USA as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC and invited interested parties to comment on this.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da namerava uporabiti ZDA kot ustrezno primerljivo državo za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK, in pozvala zainteresirane strani, da predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi s tem.
A number of comments were received and other countries were proposed as an alternative, in particular Brazil and Israel.
Komisija je prejela več pripomb in predlagane so bile druge možne primerljive države, zlasti Brazilija in Izrael.