natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
No later than 11 months before the working timetable comes into force, the infrastructure managers shall ensure that provisional international train paths have been established in cooperation with other relevant infrastructure managers.
Upravljavci infrastrukture najpozneje 11 mesecev pred začetkom veljavnosti operativnega voznega reda določijo začasne mednarodne vlakovne poti v sodelovanju z drugimi zadevnimi upravljavci infrastrukture.
Infrastructure managers shall ensure that as far as possible these are adhered to during the subsequent processes.
Upravljavci infrastrukture zagotovijo, kolikor je mogoče, da se te vlakovne poti upoštevajo v nadaljnjih postopkih.
No later than four months after the deadline for submission of bids by applicants, the infrastructure manager shall prepare a draft working timetable.
Upravljavec infrastrukture najpozneje štiri mesece po izteku roka za vložitev prošenj prosilcev pripravi osnutek operativnega voznega reda.
ACCOUNTING INFORMATION TO BE SUPPLIED TO THE REGULATORY BODY UPON REQUEST
RAČUNOVODSKI PODATKI, KI SE NA ZAHTEVO PREDLOŽIJO REGULATORNEMU ORGANU
(referred to in Article 56(12))
(iz člena 56(12))
Account separation
Ločevanje računov
separate profit and loss accounts and balance sheets for freight, passenger and infrastructure management activities;
ločeni izkazi uspeha in bilanca stanja za dejavnosti tovornega prometa, potniškega prometa in upravljanja infrastrukture;
detailed information on individual sources and uses of public funds and other forms of compensation in a transparent and detailed manner, including a detailed review of the businesses' cash flows in order to determine in what way these public funds and other forms of compensation have been used;
podrobne informacije o posameznih virih ter porabi javnih sredstev in drugih oblik nadomestil na pregleden in podroben način, vključno s podrobnim pregledom denarnih tokov podjetja, da je mogoče ugotoviti, kako so bila ta javna sredstva in druge oblike nadomestil porabljena;
cost and profit categories making it possible to determine whether cross-subsidies between these different activities occurred, according to the requirements of the regulatory body;
kategoriji stroškov in dobičkov, iz katerih je mogoče na podlagi zahtev regulatornega organa ugotoviti, ali je med temi različnimi dejavnostmi prihajalo do navzkrižnega subvencioniranja;
methodology used to allocate costs between different activities;
metodologija, ki se je uporabila za dodeljevanje stroškov med različne dejavnosti;
where the regulated firm is part of a group structure, full details of inter-company payments.
če je regulirano podjetje del skupine, vse podrobnosti o plačilih med podjetji.
Monitoring of track access charges
Spremljanje uporabnin za dostop po tirih
different cost categories, in particular providing sufficient information on marginal/direct costs of the different services or groups of services so that infrastructure charges can be monitored;
različne kategorije stroškov, zlasti pa zagotavljanje zadostnih podatkov o mejnih/neposrednih stroških različnih storitev ali skupin storitev, tako da je omogočeno spremljanje uporabnin za infrastrukturo;
sufficient information to allow monitoring of the individual charges paid for services (or groups of services); if required by the regulatory body, this information shall contain data on volumes of individual services, prices for individual services and total revenues for individual services paid by internal and external customers;
dovolj podatkov za spremljanje posameznih uporabnin, ki so bile plačane za storitve (ali skupine storitev); ti podatki na zahtevo regulatornega organa vključujejo podatke o obsegu posameznih storitev, cene posameznih storitev in skupne prihodke za posamezne storitve, ki so jih plačale notranje in zunanje porabnike;
costs and revenues for individual services (or groups of services) using the relevant cost methodology, as required by the regulatory body, to identify potentially anti-competitive pricing (cross-subsidies, predatory pricing and excessive pricing).
stroški in prihodki za posamezne storitve (ali skupine storitev) z uporabo ustrezne stroškovne metodologije, kot to zahteva regulatorni organ, da se lahko ugotovi potencialno protikonkurenčno oblikovanje cen (navzkrižne subvencije, plenilske cene in previsoke cene).
Indication of financial performance
Izkaz finančne uspešnosti
a statement of financial performance;
izkaz finančne uspešnosti;
a summary expenditure statement;
izkaz skupnih odhodkov;
a maintenance expenditure statement;
izkaz odhodkov za vzdrževanje;
an operating expenditure statement;
izkaz odhodkov za obratovanje;
an income statement;
izkaz prihodkov;
supporting notes that amplify and explain the statements, where appropriate.
po potrebi dodatne opombe v podporo izkazom ali njihovo obrazložitev.
REPEALED DIRECTIVES WITH LIST OF SUCCESSIVE AMENDMENTS
RAZVELJAVLJENE DIREKTIVE S SEZNAMOM NJIHOVIH POZNEJŠIH SPREMEMB
(referred to in Article 65)
(iz člena 65)
Council Directive 91/440/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 91/440/EGS
(OJ L 237, 24.8.1991, p. 25)
(UL L 237, 24.8.1991, str. 25)
Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2001/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 1)
(UL L 75, 15.3.2001, str. 1)
Directive 2004/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2004/51/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 164)
(UL L 164, 30.4.2004, str. 164)
(OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 344)
(UL L 363, 20.12.2006, str. 344)
only Point B of the Annex
samo točka B Priloge
(OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 44)
(UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 44)
Council Directive 95/18/EC
Direktiva Sveta 95/18/ES
(OJ L 143, 27.6.1995, p. 70)
(UL L 143, 27.6.1995, str. 70)
Directive 2001/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2001/13/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 26)
(UL L 75, 15.3.2001, str. 26)
Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 44)
(UL L 164, 30.4.2004, str. 44)
only Article 29
samo člen 29
Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2001/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 29)
(UL L 75, 15.3.2001, str. 29)
Commission Decision 2002/844/EC
Odločba Komisije 2002/844/ES
(OJ L 289, 26.10.2002, p. 30)
(UL L 289, 26.10.2002, str. 30)
only Article 30
samo člen 30
LIST OF TIME LIMITS FOR TRANSPOSITION INTO NATIONAL LAW
SEZNAM ROKOV ZA PRENOS V NACIONALNO PRAVO
91/440/EEC
91/440/EGS
1 January 1993
1. januar 1993
27 June 1997
27. junij 1997
4 June 2009
4. junij 2009
Directive 91/440/EEC
Direktiva 91/440/EGS
Directive 95/18/EC
Direktiva 95/18/ES
Directive 2001/14/EC
Direktiva 2001/14/ES
Article 2(4) to (9)
Člen 2(4) do (9)
Article 3(1) to (8)
Člen 3, točke 1 do 8
Article 3(9) to (13)
Člen 3, točke 9 do 13
Article 2(b) and (c)
Člen 2(b) in (c)
Article 3(14) and (15)
Člen 3, točki 14 in 15
Article 3(16) and (17)
Člen 3, točki 16 in 17
Article 3(18) to (28)
Člen 3, točke 18 do 28
Article 3(29) and (30)
Člen 3, točki 29 in 30
Article 6(3) and Annex II
Člen 6(3) in Priloga II
Article 4(2) and Article 14(2)
Člena 4(2) in 14(2)
Article 7(1), (3) and (4)
Člen 7(1), (3) in (4)
Article 8(1), (2) and (3)
Člen 8(1), (2) in (3)
Article 10(3) and (3a)
Člen 10(3) in (3a)
Article 10(3b)
Člen 10(3b)
Article 10(3c) and (3e)
Člen 10 (3c) in (3e)
Article 10(3f)
Člen 10(3f)
Article 17(1) to (4)
Člen 17(1) do (4)
Annex, Part I, point (1)
Priloga, del I, točka 1
Article 23(2) and (3)
Člen 23(2) in (3)
Article 4(1) and (3) to (6)
Člen 4(1) in (3) do (6)
Article 6(2) to (5)
Člen 6(2) do (5)
Article 20(1), (2) and (3)
Člen 20(1), (2) in (3)
Article 45(1), (2) and (3)
Člen 45(1), (2) in (3)
Article 35(1), (2) and (3)
Člen 35(1), (2) in (3)
Article 10(9)
Člen 10(9)
The overall level of cost recovery through infrastructure charges affects the necessary level of government contribution.
Skupna višina kritja stroškov s pomočjo uporabnin za infrastrukturo vpliva na višino državnih prispevkov.
Member States may require different levels of overall cost recovery.
Države članice lahko zahtevajo različne višine skupnega kritja stroškov.
Lighting installations for traffic and safety purposes, Plant for transforming and carrying electric power for train haulage: substations, supply cables between substations and contact wires, catenaries and supports; third rail with supports,
naprave za pretvorbo in prenos električne energije za vleko vlakov: elektronapajalne postaje, energetski vodi od elektronapajalnih postaj do vozne mreže, vozna mreža z nosilno konstrukcijo; tretje tokovne tirnice s pritrditvijo,
Corrigendum to Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area
Popravek Direktive 2012/34/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. novembra 2012 o vzpostavitvi enotnega evropskega železniškega območja
(Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 14 December 2012) On page 58, first subparagraph of Article 55(3): for: ‘3. …, where relevant, be appointed under clear and transparent rules which guarantee their independence by the national cabinet or council of ministers or by any other public authority which does not directly exert ownership rights over regulated undertakings.’ , read: ‘3. …, where relevant, be appointed, under clear and transparent rules which guarantee their independence, by the national cabinet or council of ministers or by any other public authority which does not directly exert ownership rights over regulated undertakings.’ ;
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 343 z dne 14. decembra 2012)
on page 62, Article 65, first paragraph:
Stran 62, člen 65, prvi odstavek:
‘… repealed with effect from 15 December 2012, …’,
„… so razveljavljene z učinkom od 15. decembra 2012, …“
‘… repealed with effect from 17 June 2015, …’.
„… so razveljavljene z učinkom od 17. junija 2015, …“.
Directive 2012/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2012/35/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 2008/106/EC on the minimum level of training of seafarers
o spremembi Direktive 2008/106/ES o minimalni ravni izobraževanja pomorščakov
The training and certification of seafarers is regulated by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers 1978 (the ‘STCW Convention’), which entered into force in 1984 and which was significantly amended in 1995.
Usposabljanje in izdajanje spričeval pomorščakom ureja Konvencija o standardih za usposabljanje, izdajanje spričeval in ladijsko stražarjenje pomorščakov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija STCW) Mednarodne pomorske organizacije (IMO) iz leta 1978, ki je začela veljati leta 1984 in je bila bistveno spremenjena leta 1995.
The STCW Convention was incorporated into Union law for the first time by Council Directive 94/58/EC of 22 November 1994 on the minimum level of training of seafarers [3].
Konvencija STCW je bila v zakonodajo Unije prvič vključena z Direktivo Sveta 94/58/ES z dne 22. novembra 1994 o minimalni ravni izobraževanja pomorščakov [3].
The Union rules on training and certification of seafarers were later adapted to the subsequent amendments to the STCW Convention, and a common Union mechanism for the recognition of the systems of training and certification of seafarers in third countries was set up.
Pravila Unije o usposabljanju in izdajanju spričeval pomorščakom so bila pozneje prilagojena naknadnim spremembam Konvencije STCW, vzpostavljen pa je bil skupni mehanizem Unije za priznavanje sistemov usposabljanja in izdaje spričeval pomorščakom v tretjih državah.
Those rules are, as the result of a recast, contained in Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Navedena pravila so, kot posledica prenovitve, vsebovana v Direktivi 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
A Conference of Parties to the STCW Convention held in Manila in 2010 introduced significant amendments to the STCW Convention (the ‘Manila amendments’), namely on the prevention of fraudulent practices for certificates, in the field of medical standards, in the matter of training on security, including piracy and armed robbery, and with respect to training in technology-related matters.
Leta 2010 je bilo v Manili srečanje Konference pogodbenic Konvencije STCW, na katerem so bile sprejete bistvene spremembe Konvencije STCW (v nadaljnjem besedilu: manilske spremembe), in sicer v zvezi s preprečevanjem goljufij s spričevali, zdravstvenimi standardi, usposabljanjem na področju varnosti, vključno s piratstvom in oboroženimi ropi, ter usposabljanjem na področju tehnologije.
The Manila amendments also introduced requirements for able seafarers and established new professional profiles, such as electro-technical officers.
Manilske spremembe so uvedle tudi zahteve za kvalificirane pomorščake in določile nove strokovne profile, na primer častnike elektrotehnike.
All Member States are parties to the STCW Convention and none of them has objected to the Manila amendments under the procedure foreseen to that effect.
Vse države članice so pogodbenice Konvencije STCW in nobena ni nasprotovala manilskim spremembam v skladu s predvidenim postopkom.
Member States should therefore align their national rules with the Manila amendments.
Države članice bi morale zato svoje nacionalne predpise uskladiti z manilskimi spremembami.
A conflict between the international commitments of Member States and their Union commitments should be avoided.
Preprečiti bi bilo treba kolizijo med mednarodnimi obveznostmi držav članic in njihovimi obveznostmi na ravni Unije.
Moreover, given the global nature of shipping, Union rules on training and certification of seafarers should be kept in line with international rules.
Ob upoštevanju globalne narave pomorskega prometa bi bilo treba zagotavljati tudi usklajenost pravil Unije o usposabljanju in izdaji spričeval pomorščakom z mednarodnimi pravili.
Several provisions of Directive 2008/106/EC should, therefore, be amended in order to reflect the Manila amendments.
Zato bi bilo treba spremeniti več določb Direktive 2008/106/ES, da bodo odražale manilske spremembe.
Improved training for seafarers should cover proper theoretical and practical training so as to ensure that seafarers are qualified to meet security and safety standards and are able to respond to hazards and emergencies.
Izboljšano usposabljanje pomorščakov bi moralo zajemati ustrezno teoretično in praktično usposabljanje za zagotovitev, da so pomorščaki usposobljeni za doseganje varnostnih standardov ter se lahko odzivajo na nevarnosti in nujne primere.
Quality standards and quality standards systems should be developed and implemented taking into account, where applicable, the Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the establishment of a European Quality Assurance Reference Framework for Vocational Education and Training [5] and related measures adopted by the Member States.
Oblikovati in izvajati bi bilo treba standarde kakovosti in sisteme standardov kakovosti, pri čemer se po potrebi upoštevajo Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. junija 2009 o vzpostavitvi evropskega referenčnega okvira za zagotavljanje kakovosti poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja [5] ter s tem povezani ukrepi, ki so jih sprejele države članice.
European social partners have agreed on minimum hours of rest applicable to seafarers and Directive 1999/63/EC [6] was adopted with a view to implementing that agreement.
(7) Evropski socialni partnerji so se dogovorili o minimalnem času počitka, ki velja za pomorščake, za izvajanje navedenega sporazuma pa je bila sprejeta Direktiva 1999/63/ES [6].
That Directive also allows for the possibility to authorise exceptions to the minimum hours of rest for seafarers.
Navedena direktiva dopušča tudi možnost za odobritev izjem glede minimalnega časa počitka za pomorščake.
The possibility to authorise exceptions should, however, be limited in terms of maximum duration, frequency and scope.
Kljub temu bi morala biti možnost za odobritev izjem omejena z vidika najdaljšega trajanja, pogostosti in področja uporabe.
The Manila amendments aimed, amongst other things, to set objective limits to the exceptions to the minimum rest hours for watchkeeping personnel and seafarers with designated tasks related to safety, security and prevention of pollution with a view to preventing fatigue.
Cilj manilskih sprememb je med drugim bil določiti objektivne omejitve izjem glede minimalnega časa počitka za osebje, ki opravlja ladijsko stražarjenje, in pomorščake, ki opravljajo naloge na področju varnosti in preprečevanja onesnaževanja, da bi preprečili utrujenost.
The Manila amendments should be incorporated in Directive 2008/106/EC in a manner that ensures coherence with Directive 1999/63/EC, as amended by Directive 2009/13/EC [7].
Manilske spremembe bi bilo treba vključiti v Direktivo 2008/106/ES, tako da bi zagotovili skladnost z Direktivo 1999/63/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/13/ES [7].
Further recognising the importance of setting out minimum requirements governing the living and working conditions of all seafarers, Directive 2009/13/EC will take effect as specified therein, when the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, enters into force.
Direktiva 2009/13/ES, ki dodatno priznava pomen določitve minimalnih zahtev, ki urejajo delovne in življenjske pogoje vseh pomorščakov, bo začela veljati, kakor je zapisano v njej, tj. ko bo začela veljati Konvencija o delovnih standardih v pomorstvu iz leta 2006.
Directive 2008/106/EC also contains a mechanism for the recognition of the systems of training and certification of seafarers of third countries.
Direktiva 2008/106/ES vsebuje tudi mehanizem za priznavanje sistemov usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakom v tretjih državah.
The recognition is granted by the Commission in accordance with a procedure under which the Commission is assisted by the European Maritime Safety Agency (the ‘Agency’) established by Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] and by the Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (COSS), established by Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9].
Priznanje odobri Komisija v skladu s postopkom, v katerem Komisiji pomagata Evropska agencija za pomorsko varnost (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija), ustanovljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1406/2002 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta [8], ter Odbor za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij (COSS), ustanovljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 2099/2002 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta [9].
Experience gained in applying that procedure suggests that it should be changed, namely with respect to the deadline for the Commission decision.
Izkušnje, pridobljene z uporabo navedenega postopka, pa kažejo, da bi ga bilo treba spremeniti, in sicer v zvezi z rokom za odločitev Komisije.
Since the recognition requires an inspection to be performed by the Agency, which has to be planned and carried out, and, in most cases, involves significant adjustments to the STCW Convention requirements by the third country concerned, the whole process cannot be completed in three months.
Ker priznavanje zahteva, da Agencija opravi inšpekcijski pregled, ki ga je treba načrtovati in izvesti, v večini primerov pa vključuje tudi bistvene prilagoditve sistema zadevne tretje države zahtevam Konvencije STCW, celotnega postopka ni mogoče zaključiti v treh mesecih.
On the basis of experience, a more realistic time-frame in this respect appears to be 18 months.
Na podlagi izkušenj se zdi, da je realnejši časovni okvir 18 mesecev.
The deadline for the Commission decision should therefore be changed accordingly, while the possibility for the requesting Member State to provisionally recognise the third country’s STCW system should be kept in order to maintain flexibility.
Rok za odločitev Komisije bi bilo treba zato ustrezno spremeniti, obenem pa zaradi prilagodljivosti ohraniti možnost, da država članica, ki priznanje zahteva, začasno prizna STCW sistem tretje države.
Furthermore, the provisions for recognition of professional qualifications under Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications [10] are not applicable with regard to the recognition of certificates of seafarers under Directive 2008/106/EC.
Poleg tega se določbe o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij iz Direktive 2005/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij [10] ne uporabljajo za priznavanje spričeval pomorščakov v skladu z Direktivo 2008/106/ES.
Available statistics on seafarers in the Union are incomplete and often inaccurate, which makes policy-making in this sector more difficult.
Razpoložljivi statistični podatki o pomorščakih v Uniji so nepopolni in pogosto netočni, kar otežuje oblikovanje politik za ta sektor.
Detailed data on certification of seafarers cannot entirely solve this problem but they would clearly help.
Podrobni podatki o izdajanju spričeval pomorščakom tega problema ne morejo popolnoma rešiti, vendar bi bili nedvomno koristni.
Under the STCW Convention Parties are obliged to maintain registers of all certificates and endorsements and the relevant revalidations or other measures affecting them.
V skladu s Konvencijo STCW morajo pogodbenice voditi registre vseh spričeval in overitev ter ustreznih ponovnih potrditev veljavnosti ali drugih ukrepov, ki vplivajo nanje.
Member States are obliged to maintain a register of issued certificates and endorsements.
Države članice morajo voditi register izdanih spričeval in overitev.
In order to have information that is as complete as possible on the employment situation in the Union and exclusively with a view to facilitating policy-making by Member States and the Commission, Member States should be required to send to the Commission selected information already contained in their registers of seafarers’ certificates of competency.
Da bi se zagotovili čim bolj popolni podatki o stanju zaposlovanja v Uniji in zgolj z namenom, da bi olajšali oblikovanje politik v državah članicah in Komisiji, bi bilo treba od držav članic zahtevati, da Komisiji pošiljajo izbrane podatke, ki so že na voljo v njihovih registrih spričeval o usposobljenosti pomorščakov.
That information should be communicated for the purposes of statistical analysis only, and is not to be used for administrative, legal or verification purposes.
Ti podatki bi se morali sporočati le za statistične analize in se ne smejo uporabljati v upravne ali pravne namene ali namene preverjanja.
That information must be in line with the data protection requirements of the Union and, therefore, a provision to that effect should be introduced in Directive 2008/106/EC.
Ti podatki morajo biti usklajeni z zahtevami Unije za varstvo podatkov in zato bi bilo treba vključiti ustrezno določbo v Direktivo 2008/106/ES.
The results of the analysis of such information should be used to anticipate trends in the labour market with a view to improving the options for seafarers with regard to career planning and taking advantage of available vocational education and training opportunities.
Rezultate analize teh podatkov bi bilo treba uporabiti pri predvidevanju gibanj na trgu dela, da bi izboljšali možnosti pomorščakov pri načrtovanju poklicne poti ter izkoriščanju priložnosti, ki jih ponujata poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje.
Such results should also contribute to the improvement of vocational education and training.
Ti rezultati bi morali prispevati tudi k izboljšanju poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja.