natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, Finnvera’s Supervisory Board includes representatives of organisations in line with the company’s industrial policy goals.
Poleg tega nadzorni svet podjetja Finnvera vključuje predstavnike organizacij, ki delujejo v skladu s cilji industrijske politike podjetja.
The Board of Directors, which has 6-9 members and 2 deputy members, confirms the company’s strategy, approves the financial statements and the interim report, advances the company’s development and ensures that the operations are conform to law and meet the goals set by the owner.
Upravni odbor, ki ima 6–9 članov in 2 namestna člana, potrdi strategijo podjetja, odobri računovodske izkaze in vmesna poročila, usmerja razvoj podjetja ter zagotavlja, da je delovanje v skladu s pravom in izpolnjuje cilje, ki jih je zastavil lastnik.
Four of the Board members and the two deputy members are elected among candidates named by various ministries.
Štirje člani odbora in dva namestna člana so izvoljeni med kandidati, ki jih imenujejo različna ministrstva.
The Managing Director is responsible for the company's administration.
Izvršni direktor je odgovoren za upravljanje podjetja.
The approval decision is based on the fact that Finnish authorities have given a commitment that Finnvera will limit its activities to the administration of state aid schemes [30].
Sklep o odobritvi temelji na dejstvu, da so se finski organi zavezali, da bo podjetje Finnvera omejilo svoje dejavnosti na upravljanje shem državne pomoči [30].
Guarantee granted on 17 March 2004 (measure 13)
Poroštvo, dodeljeno 17. marca 2004 (ukrep 13)
On 17 March 2004, Finnvera granted a 100 % guarantee for a loan amounting to EUR 91000 with a guarantee fee of 3 % per year.
Podjetje Finnvera je 17. marca 2004 dodelilo 100-odstotno poroštvo za posojilo v vrednosti 91000 EUR s 3-odstotno letno provizijo za poroštvo.
The loan, which had a duration of 3 years, was granted by Tapiola at a fixed interest rate of [2-5] % per year.
Posojilo za obdobje 3 let je dodelila banka Tapiola po [2–5]-odstotni letni fiksni obrestni meri.
The loan and the guarantee respectively were given to replace a loan granted by Tapiola in 1992.
Posojilo oziroma poroštvo sta bila zagotovljena, da nadomestita posojilo, ki ga je banka Tapiola dodelila leta 1992.
Loan granted on 12 January 2006 (measure 14)
Posojilo, dodeljeno 12. januarja 2006 (ukrep 14)
On 12 January 2006, Finnvera granted a loan amounting to EUR 180000 at an interest rate of EURIBOR 6 months + 2 % per year.
Podjetje Finnvera je 12. januarja 2006 dodelilo posojilo v vrednosti 180000 EUR po obrestni meri 6-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 2 % letno.
The loan relates to interest accrued during the restructuring process between 2 December 2004 and 28 February 2008, which was converted into a new credit facility.
Posojilo je povezano z obrestmi, nastalimi med postopkom prestrukturiranja med 2. decembrom 2004 in 28. februarjem 2008, ki so bile pretvorjene v nov kreditni program.
The loan was collateralised by mortgages in properties located in Tikkala, Lappeenranta and Kouvola, and shares in […].
Posojilo je bilo zavarovano s hipotekami na lastnino v krajih Tikkala, Lappeenranta in Kouvola ter delnicami v […].
Private creditors […] and […] converted the interest rates at the same time into loans.
Zasebna upnika […] in […] sta obrestne mere istočasno pretvorila v posojila.
Guarantee granted on 14 September 2006 (measure 15)
Poroštvo, dodeljeno 14. septembra 2006 (ukrep 15)
On 14 September 2006, Finnvera granted a counter-guarantee to […] amounting to EUR 300000 with a guarantee fee of 1,65 % per year paid by Karjaportti.
Podjetje Finnvera je 14. septembra 2006 dodelilo posredno osebno jamstvo […] v znesku 300000 EUR z 1,65-odstotno letno provizijo za poroštvo, ki jo plača podjetje Karjaportti.
[…] in turn granted a guarantee to Karjaportti for the same amount at an interest rate of 1,25 %.
[…] je v zameno podjetju Karjaportti dodelil poroštvo v enakem znesku po 1,25-odstotni obrestni meri.
This guarantee and the counter-guarantee covered 16,7 % of EUR 1,8 million relating to a subcontracting agreement between […] and Karjaportti.
To poroštvo in posredno osebno jamstvo sta krila 16,7 % od 1,8 milijona EUR, povezanih s pogodbo o podizvajalskih delih med […] in podjetjem Karjaportti.
The duration of Finnvera's guarantee was 8 months.
Veljavnost poroštva podjetja Finnvera je bila 8 mesecev.
The remainder of the subcontracting agreement was covered by guarantees from […] and […] (EUR 825000 and EUR 675000 respectively) who charged a guarantee fee of 1,75 %.
Preostali del podizvajalske pogodbe sta zajemali poroštvi upnikov […] in […] (825000 EUR oziroma 675000 EUR), ki sta zaračunala 1,75-odstotno provizijo za poroštvo.
Finnvera was not involved in the grant of these guarantees, that is to say they were not counter-guaranteed.
Podjetje Finnvera ni sodelovalo pri dodelitvi teh poroštev, kar pomeni, da niso bila posredna osebna jamstva.
Finnvera's counter-guarantee expired on 30 June 2007 without having been invoked.
Posredno osebno jamstvo podjetja Finnvera je poteklo 30. junija 2007, ne da bi začelo delovati.
Accordingly, no payment obligations were incurred by Finnvera on the basis of this guarantee.
V skladu s tem na podlagi tega poroštva niso nastale plačilne obveznosti podjetja Finnvera.
Loan granted on 6 July 2007 (measure 16)
Posojilo, dodeljeno 6. julija 2007 (ukrep 16)
On 6 July 2007, Finnvera granted a loan amounting to EUR 250000 at an interest rate of EURIBOR 6 months + 2,5 % per year.
Podjetje Finnvera je 6. julija 2007 dodelilo posojilo v vrednosti 250000 EUR po obrestni meri 6-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 2,5 % letno.
At the same time, private creditors, […] and […], granted loans amounting to EUR 800000 and EUR 650000 respectively, also for a duration of six months.
Obenem sta zasebna upnika […] in […] dodelila posojili v vrednosti 800000 EUR oziroma 650000 EUR, ki sta prav tako veljali za obdobje šestih mesecev.
The interest rate for those loans was 1 month EURIBOR plus 2 %.
Obrestna mera navedenih posojil je bila 1-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 2 %.
The reimbursement of their loans has also been delayed (outstanding amounts on 23 November 2011: EUR […] and EUR […]).
Tudi povračilo njunih posojil je bilo odloženo (neporavnana zneska z dne 23. novembra 2011: […] EUR in […] EUR).
For those two loans and the loan granted by Finnvera, Karjaportti provided the following collateral: a business mortgage with a registered value of EUR 1850067; shares in the company […]; and a bank account.
Za obe navedeni posojili in posojilo, ki ga je dodelilo podjetje Finnvera, je podjetje Karjaportti zagotovilo naslednja zavarovanja s premoženjem: poslovno hipoteko z zabeleženo vrednostjo v višini 1850067 EUR, delnice v podjetju […] in bančni račun.
These collaterals were divided between Finnvera, […] and […] according to their risk in relation to the loans.
Ta zavarovanja s premoženjem so bila razdeljena med podjetjem Finnvera, […] in […] glede na njihovo tveganje v povezavi s posojili.
In fact, the three creditors had the same ranking and divided the collateral by way of a share of percentages (Finnvera: [0-30] %; [the first private creditor]: [10-50] %; [the second private creditor]: [10-50] %).
Pravzaprav so bili trije upniki enako uvrščeni in so zavarovanje s premoženjem razdelili glede na deleže odstotkov (podjetje Finnvera: [0–30] %; [prvi zasebni upnik]: [10–50] %; [drugi zasebni upnik]: [10–50] %).
Guarantee granted on 9 January 2008 (measure 17)
Poroštvo, dodeljeno 9. januarja 2008 (ukrep 17)
On 9 January 2008, Finnvera granted a counter-guarantee to […] amounting to EUR 280000 with a guarantee fee of 2,5 % per year paid by Karjaportti.
Podjetje Finnvera je 9. januarja 2008 dodelilo posredno osebno jamstvo za […] v znesku 280000 EUR z 2,5-odstotno letno provizijo za poroštvo, ki jo plača podjetje Karjaportti.
The counter-guarantee covered 80 % of a guarantee provided by […] to Karjaportti on 11 January 2008 amounting to EUR 350000 relating to a subcontracting agreement between […] and […].
Posredno osebno jamstvo je krilo 80 % poroštva, ki ga je […] zagotovilo podjetju Karjaportti 11. januarja 2008, v vrednosti 350000 EUR v zvezi s podizvajalsko pogodbo med […] in […].
[…]charged a guarantee fee of [0-3] %.
[…] je zaračunal [0–3]-odstotno provizijo za poroštvo.
Finnvera had access to a collateral in the form of a shareholding of Karjaportti in […].
Podjetje Finnvera je dostopalo do zavarovanja s premoženjem v obliki lastništva delnic podjetja Karjaportti v […].
According to an estimate undertaken by Finnvera, dated 8 January 2008, at the time of the grant of the counter-guarantee these shares had a security value for Finnvera of EUR […]. The counter-guarantee expired on 28 February 2011, and no payments were made under it.
Glede na oceno z dne 8. januarja 2008, ki jo je opravilo podjetje Finnvera, so imele te delnice ob dodelitvi posrednega osebnega jamstva zavarovano vrednost za podjetje Finnvera v višini […] EUR. Posredno osebno jamstvo je poteklo 28. februarja 2011 in v njegovem okviru ni bilo opravljenih plačil.
As described in recitals 2, 3 and 6 the Commission decided on 8 April 2009 to open a formal investigation procedure (hereinafter 'the first opening decision').
Kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 2, 3 in 6, se je Komisija 8. aprila 2009 odločila za začetek formalnega postopka preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prva odločitev o začetku postopka).
This formal investigation procedure was extended to several additional measures on 15 December 2009 (hereinafter 'the second opening decision').
Ta formalni postopek preiskave je bil 15. decembra 2009 razširjen na več dodatnih ukrepov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: druga odločitev o začetku postopka).
Guarantee granted on 12 June 2000 (measure 1)
Poroštvo, dodeljeno 12. junija 2000 (ukrep 1)
In its first opening decision, the Commission doubted that the measure in question would be in conformity with the private market economy investor principle.
V svoji prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija imela pomisleke o skladnosti zadevnega ukrepa z načelom zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.
First, in accordance with Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees [31] ('the Guarantee Notice 2000') that was in force at the time when the measure was granted, the measure may constitute state aid since the guarantee covered 100 % of the loan in question.
Prvič, v skladu z Obvestilom Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki poroštev [31] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o poroštvih 2000), ki je veljalo ob odobritvi ukrepa, ukrep lahko pomeni državno pomoč, ker je poroštvo krilo 100 % zadevnega posojila.
This conclusion would not be changed by the Guarantee Notice 2008 currently in force [32].
Tega sklepa obvestilo o poroštvih 2008, ki trenutno velja, ne bi spremenilo [32].
Moreover, granting the guarantee without a commission fee, that is in effect taking on a financial risk without any quid-pro-quo, cannot be described as the behaviour of a market operator.
Poleg tega dodelitev poroštva brez provizije, pri čemer je prisotno finančno tveganje brez protiuteži, ne more biti opisana kot vedenje udeleženca na trgu.
As regards compatibility, the Commission had doubts that the guarantee could qualify for an exception under Article 107(3) of the TFEU; according to a preliminary assessment the conditions of Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty [33] ('the R&R Guidelines 1999') seemed not to have been met.
Komisija je imela pomisleke glede združljivosti, in sicer ali bi poroštvo lahko bilo izjema v skladu s členom 107(3) PDEU, saj na podlagi predhodne ocene pogoji Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [33] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 1999) naj ne bi bili izpolnjeni.
Assignment of land (measure 2)
Dodelitev zemljišč (ukrep 2)
In the second opening decision, the Commission expressed doubts that the sale was undertaken in accordance with the market economy investor principle, as the requirements of the Commission Communication on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities [34] were not met.
V drugi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija izrazila pomisleke, da je bila prodaja opravljena v skladu z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, saj zahteve iz Sporočila Komisije o elementih državne pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti [34] niso bile izpolnjene.
It was considered that no market price was paid, as the land was assigned to Karjaportti without consideration.
Upoštevalo se je, da tržna cena ni bila plačana, saj je bilo zemljišče dodeljeno podjetju Karjaportti brez plačila.
In addition, Karjaportti did not have to bear the costs of levelling the site.
Poleg tega podjetje Karjaportti ni nosilo stroškov izravnave zemljišča.
Purchase of land (measure 3)
Nakup zemljišč (ukrep 3)
In the second opening decision, the Commission expressed doubts that the terms and conditions of the purchase complied with the market economy investor principle, as Finland did not provide evidence that the purchase of the properties was done under market conditions, such as an evaluation of the properties by an independent expert.
V drugi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija izrazila dvome, da so bili pogoji nakupa skladni z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, saj Finska ni zagotovila dokaza, da je nakup zemljišč potekal po tržnih pogojih, kot na primer ocene zemljišč neodvisnih strokovnjakov.
In the second opening decision, the Commission doubted that the measure in question would be in conformity with the private market economy investor principle.
V drugi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija imela pomisleke o skladnosti zadevnega ukrepa z načelom zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.
First, in accordance with the Guarantee Notice 2000 that was in force at the time of the granting, the measure may constitute state aid since the guarantee covered 100 % of the loan in question.
Prvič, v skladu z obvestilom o poroštvih 2000, ki je veljalo ob dodelitvi, ukrep lahko pomeni državno pomoč, saj poroštvo krije 100 % zadevnega posojila.
This conclusion would not be changed by the Guarantee Notice 2008 currently in force.
Tega sklepa obvestilo o poroštvih 2008, ki trenutno velja, ne bi spremenilo.
Moreover, granting the guarantee without a commission fee, that is in effect taking on a financial risk without any quid-pro-quo, cannot be described as the behaviour of a market operator, in particular in a situation where the company already was in difficulties.
Poleg tega dodelitev poroštva brez provizije, pri čemer je prisotno finančno tveganje brez protiuteži, ne more biti opisano kot vedenje udeleženca na trgu, zlasti v položaju, ko je podjetje že bilo v težavah.
As regards the compatibility of the measure, the Commission was not provided sufficient information that would allow it to determine whether the requirements set out in the R&R Guidelines 1999 were met.
Glede združljivosti ukrepa Komisiji ni bilo zagotovljenih dovolj informacij, s katerimi bi lahko ugotovila, ali so bile zahteve iz smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 1999 izpolnjene.
The Commission had similar doubts as for the guarantee granted on 8 March 2004.
Komisija je imela podobne pomisleke kot pri poroštvu, dodeljenem 8. marca 2004.
Agreement to the court supervised restructuring proceedings (measure 6)
Soglasje k postopku prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča (ukrep 6)
In the first opening decision, the Commission doubted that the measures taken during restructuring would be in conformity with the private market economy investor principle.
V prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka je imela Komisija pomisleke o skladnosti ukrepov, sprejetih med postopkom prestrukturiranja, z načelom zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.
First, the City of Mikkeli agreed to reducing the interest rates for the secured debts with the effect that the interest rates charged were far below the reference rate for Finland at that time.
Prvič, mesto Mikkeli se je strinjalo z znižanjem obrestnih mer za zavarovane dolgove, kar je pomenilo, da so bile zaračunane obrestne mere veliko pod referenčno obrestno mero za Finsko v tistem času.
Since the reference rate is considered to be the market rate for healthy companies, and since Karjaportti was in difficulties at the time, the Commission found it unlikely that a private creditor would have granted the loans at such a low interest rate.
Ker je referenčna obrestna mera obravnavana kot tržna obrestna mera za zdrava podjetja in ker je bilo podjetje Karjaportti v tistem času v težavah, se je Komisiji zdelo malo verjetno, da bi zasebni upnik dodelil posojila po tako nizki obrestni meri.
As regards the compatibility of the measures, the Commission at the time of the opening only had limited knowledge of the restructuring measures taken by Karjaportti since 2004.
Glede združljivosti ukrepov je Komisija v času sklepa le slabo poznala ukrepe prestrukturiranja, ki jih je sprejemalo podjetje Karjaportti od leta 2004.
It was considered that the continuous restructuring had not been successful as the tax authorities filed for bankruptcy proceedings concerning Karjaportti in December 2008.
Menilo se je, da stalno prestrukturiranje ni bilo uspešno, saj so davčni organi decembra 2008 vložili zahtevek za stečajni postopek glede podjetja Karjaportti.
Thus, the Commission had doubts that the long-term viability of the company could be achieved through the restructuring measures undertaken.
Zato je imela Komisija pomisleke, da bi se dolgoročno uspešno delovanje podjetja lahko doseglo s pomočjo sprejetih ukrepov prestrukturiranja.
As regards the other criteria for restructuring aid according to the R&R Guidelines 2004 [35], the Commission could not, in the absence of a notification and a restructuring plan, evaluate whether the other requirements of the R&R Guidelines 2004 were met.
Glede drugih meril za pomoč za prestrukturiranje v skladu s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004 [35] Komisija ni mogla oceniti, ali so bile izpolnjene druge zahteve smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, saj ni bilo priglasitve ali načrta prestrukturiranja.
In the second opening decision, the Commission doubted that the measure in question was in conformity with the private market economy investor principle, as Finland did not provide the evidence that the purchase of the shares was done under market conditions.
V drugi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija imela pomisleke o skladnosti zadevnega ukrepa z načelom zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, saj Finska ni zagotovila dokazov, da je nakup delnic potekal pod tržnimi pogoji.
As regards the conversion of the unpaid interest rates into a loan, the City of Mikkeli agreed to charge a very low interest rate for the loan.
Glede pretvorbe neplačanih obrestnih mer v posojila se je mesto Mikkeli strinjalo, da za posojilo zaračuna zelo nizko obrestno mero.
In fact, private creditors converting their unpaid interest rates negotiated higher interest rates, which led the Commission to question whether such an approach could have been in line with the market economy investor principle.
Pravzaprav sta zasebna upnika, ki sta pretvorila svoje neplačane obrestne mere, izpogajala višje obrestne mere, zato je Komisija imela pomisleke, ali bi tak pristop lahko bil v skladu z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Write-off of debts in the financial statements in 2006 and 2008 (measure 9 and measure 10)
Odpis dolgov v računovodskih izkazih iz let 2006 in 2008 (ukrepa 9 in 10)
In the second opening decision, the Commission considered that if the write-off of debts in the financial statements in 2006 and 2008 also included the legal obligation ceasing to exist, the write-off would confer an advantage to Karjaportti.
V drugi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija obravnavala dejstvo, da bi, če je odpis dolgov v računovodskih izkazih iz let 2006 in 2008 pomenil tudi, da je pravna obveznost prenehala veljati, odpis potem pomenil prednost za podjetje Karjaportti.
In the Commission's view it was questionable whether a private market investor would have acted in the same way.
Komisija je imela pomisleke, ali bi zasebni vlagatelj v tržnem gospodarstvu ravnal enako.
In the first opening decision, the Commission doubted that the City of Mikkeli would act like a private market investor when granting the guarantee and considered preliminarily that the guarantee entailed state aid.
V prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija imela pomisleke, da bi mesto Mikkeli ravnalo kot zasebni vlagatelj v tržnem gospodarstvu pri dodelitvi poroštva, in je najprej menila, da je poroštvo vsebovalo državno pomoč.
As regards compatibility, the Commission had doubts whether the guarantee would comply with the R&R Guidelines 2004, as the "one time, last time principle" seemed not to have been met.
Glede združljivosti je Komisija imela pomisleke, ali bo poroštvo skladno s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004, saj naj načelo o enkratni pomoči ne bi bilo izpolnjeno.
In addition, the guarantee fee and the interest rate for the loan were too low in order to satisfy point 25(a) of the Guidelines and the guarantee was not in line with point 25(c) of the Guidelines, as it was not limited to six months.
Poleg tega sta bili provizija za poroštvo in obrestna mera za posojilo prenizki za izpolnitev točke 25(a) smernic ter poroštvo ni bilo v skladu s točko 25(c) smernic, saj ni bilo omejeno na šest mesecev.
In the first opening decision, the Commission doubted that the City of Mikkeli acted like a private market creditor when agreeing to the rescheduling of debts and considered preliminarily that the measure entailed state aid.
V prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija imela pomisleke, da je mesto Mikkeli ravnalo kot zasebni vlagatelj v tržnem gospodarstvu pri soglasju z odlogom plačila dolgov, in je najprej menila, da je ukrep zajemal državno pomoč.
As regards compatibility, the Commission had doubts whether the debt rescheduling would comply with the R&R Guidelines 2004, as the "one time, last time principle" seemed not to have been met.
Glede združljivosti je Komisija imela pomisleke, ali bi bil odlog plačila dolgov skladen s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004, saj naj načelo o enkratni pomoči ne bi bilo izpolnjeno.
In addition, the debt rescheduling did not meet the requirements for rescue aid.
Poleg tega odlog plačila dolgov ni izpolnjeval zahtev za pomoč za reševanje.
It was not limited to six months and was hence not in line with point 25(c) of the Guidelines.
Ni bil omejen na obdobje šestih mesecev in zato ni bil v skladu s točko 25(c) smernic.
Measures granted by Finnvera (measures 13-17)
Ukrepi, ki jih je odobrilo podjetje Finnvera (ukrepi 13–17)
In the second opening decision, the Commission considered that the measures were granted through state resources and were imputable to the State, as Finland owns 100 % of Finnvera.
V drugi odločitvi o začetku postopka je Komisija menila, da so bili ukrepi dodeljeni s pomočjo državnih sredstev in so se pripisali državi, saj je Finska 100-odstotna lastnica podjetja Finnvera.
Concerning the loans, the Commission had doubts that the interest rate charged exceeded the relevant reference rates.
Glede posojil je Komisija imela pomisleke, da je zaračunana obrestna mera presegla ustrezne referenčne obrestne mere.
In addition, it did not have sufficient information to assess whether the measures were granted together and at equal conditions with private investors.
Poleg tega ni imela dovolj informacij, da bi ocenila, ali so bili ukrepi dodeljeni skupaj in pod enakimi pogoji z zasebnimi vlagatelji.
Concerning the guarantees, the Commission had doubts that they were granted under existing schemes, as guarantees granted to a large company in difficulty would not fall under such schemes.
Glede poroštev je Komisija imela pomisleke, ali so bila dodeljena po obstoječih shemah, saj poroštva, dodeljena velikemu podjetju v težavah, ne spadajo v take sheme.