natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in Russia and Turkey
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterega pribora (fitingov) za cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije
On 31 July 2012, the European Commission (‘the Commission’), by Regulation (EU) No 699/2012 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in Russia and Turkey.
(1) Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 31. julija 2012 z Uredbo (EU) št. 699/2012 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterega pribora (fitingov) za cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije.
The proceeding was initiated by a notice of initiation [3] published on 1 November 2011, following a complaint lodged on 20 September 2011 by the Defence committee of the Steel Butt-Welding Fittings Industry of the European Union (‘the complainants’) on behalf of producers representing more than 40 % of the total Union production of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel.
Postopek se je začel z obvestilom o začetku [3], objavljenim 1. novembra 2011, po pritožbi, ki jo je 20. septembra 2011 vložil Zaščitni odbor industrije fitingov iz jekla za varjenje Evropske unije („pritožniki“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 40 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterega pribora (fitingov) za cevi iz železa ali jekla v Uniji.
As set out in recital 15 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 15 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The Commission continued to seek and analyse all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je nadaljevala z zbiranjem in analiziranjem vseh informacij, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za oblikovanje dokončnih ugotovitev.
In the absence of any comments concerning the sampling of Union producers, unrelated importers and exporting producers, the provisional findings in recitals 5 to 11 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker k vzorčenju proizvajalcev Unije, nepovezanih uvoznikov in proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni bilo pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 5 do 11 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It is reiterated that definitive anti-dumping measures are in force in respect of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in Malaysia, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Thailand, and following circumvention practices also in respect of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in the People’s Republic of China consigned from Indonesia, Sri Lanka, the Philippines and Taiwan (with certain exceptions) [4].
Ponovno je treba poudariti, da dokončni protidampinški ukrepi veljajo za nekateri pribor (fitinge) za cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Malezije, Ljudske republike Kitajske, Republike Koreje in Tajske, zaradi prakse izogibanja pa tudi za nekateri pribor (fitinge) za cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, poslan iz Indonezije, s Šrilanke, Filipinov in Tajvana (z nekaterimi izjemami) [4].
As set out in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is tube and pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, currently falling within CN codes ex73079311, ex73079319 and ex73079980 (‘the product concerned’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 17 začasne uredbe, je zadevni izdelek pribor (fitingi) za cevi (brez litih fitingov, prirobnic in fitingov z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla) z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, vrste, ki se uporablja za varjenje ali druge namene, trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73079311, ex73079319 in ex73079980 („zadevni izdelek“).
In the absence of any comments concerning the product concerned and the like product, the provisional findings in recitals 17 to 20 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 17 do 20 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One Russian exporting producer claimed that only data obtained from Russian companies should have been used in the dumping margin calculations and that it is not accurate to use data from Turkish companies.
Eden ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da bi za izračun stopnje dampinga morali biti uporabljeni samo podatki, pridobljeni od ruskih družb, in da ni pravilno, da se uporabijo podatki turške družbe.
It should be recalled that in the absence of cooperation by any Russian exporting producer, the normal value for Russia has been established in accordance with Article 18(1) and 18(5) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the facts available, i.e. information obtained from those Turkish exporting producers that use Russian seamless steel pipes and tubes as input for the production of the product concerned.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila zaradi nesodelovanja ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov normalna vrednost za Rusijo določena v skladu s členom 18(1) in (5) osnovne uredbe na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev, tj. podatkov, prejetih od turških proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki uporabljajo ruske brezšivne jeklene cevi kot surovino za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of normal value, the provisional findings in recitals 22 to 25 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo normalne vrednosti ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 22 do 25 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of export price, the provisional findings in recitals 26 and 27 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo izvozne cene ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 26 in 27 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning the comparison of export price and normal value, the provisional findings in recitals 28 and 29 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 28 in 29 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One Russian exporting producer claimed that the provisional anti-dumping duty of 23,8 % is not justified in light of the fact that the company only exports steel elbows to the Union and even those in only very small quantities.
Eden od ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da na podlagi dejstva, da družba v Unijo izvaža samo jeklena kolena in celo ta v zelo majhnih količinah, začasna protidampinška dajatev v višini 23,8 % ni upravičena.
However, steel elbows are part of the product subject to this investigation and this has not been contested by any interested party.
Vendar pa so jeklena kolena del izdelka v preiskavi, čemur ni nasprotovala nobena od zainteresiranih strani.
In addition, the criterion to consider imports into the Union as negligible as referred to in Article 5(7) and Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation is only considered on a countrywide level and not individually per company.
Poleg tega se uvoz v Unijo lahko šteje za zanemarljiv, kot je navedeno v členu 5(7) in členu 9(3) osnovne uredbe, le v primeru, ko se upošteva na ravni države in ne na ravni posamezne družbe.
Another Russian exporting producer claimed it has not been dumping and that this is reflected by the fact that on multiple occasions it has lost tenders to Union competitors for supplying elbows and bends.
Drug ruski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da dampinga ni bilo, kar naj bi odražalo dejstvo, da je na razpisih za dobavo kolen in lokov večkrat izgubil proti konkurentom iz Unije.
As mentioned above, it is recalled that no Russian exporting producer cooperated in this investigation and therefore the dumping calculations for Russia were made in accordance with Article 18(1) and Article 18(5) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the facts available.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je treba opozoriti, da noben ruski proizvajalec izvoznik v tej preiskavi ni sodeloval, zato je bil damping za Rusijo izračunan na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18(1) in (5) osnovne uredbe.
Even if the claim is considered, it should be noted that the loss of tenders to Union competitors does not contradict the finding about dumping by the Russian exporting producer.
Tudi če se trditev upošteva, bi bilo treba opozoriti, da izguba razpisa proti konkurentom iz Unije nikakor ne nasprotuje ugotovitvi dampinga s strani ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the dumping margin calculation, the findings in recitals 30 and 31 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izračunom stopnje dampinga ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 30 in 31 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The countrywide dumping margin finally determined, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is the following:
Dokončno določena stopnja dampinga na ravni države, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, je:
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of normal value, the provisional findings in recitals 32 to 40 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo normalne vrednosti ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 32 do 40 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One exporting producer claimed that the profit margin achieved on the ocean freight, i.e. the difference between the freight charged to its customers and the freight paid by the exporting producer to the shipping company, should be included in the export price.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi morala biti stopnja dobička, dosežena pri čezmorskem prevozu, tj. razlika med prevozom, zaračunanim njegovim strankam, in prevozom, ki ga proizvajalec izvoznik plača prevozni družbi, vključena v izvozno ceno.
However, pursuant to Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation the export price shall be the price actually paid or payable for the product when sold for export from the exporting country to the Union.
Vendar je v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe izvozna cena dejansko plačana ali plačljiva cena za izdelek, prodan za izvoz iz države izvoznice v Unijo.
A profit margin achieved on the transport of the product to the customer cannot be considered as part of the export price of the product itself.
Stopnja dobička, dosežena pri prevozu izdelka do kupca, se ne more šteti za del izvozne cene samega izdelka.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of export price, the provisional findings in recitals 41 to 43 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo izvozne cene ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 41 do 43 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Turkish Steel Exporters’ Association (ÇIB) claimed that the significant price differences between seamless and welded pipe fittings have not been properly taken into account in the comparison between export price and normal value.
Združenje turških izvoznikov jekla (ÇIB) je trdilo, da pri primerjavi med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo niso bile ustrezno upoštevane znatne razlike v ceni med brezšivnim in varjenim priborom za cevi.
However, all cooperating companies have submitted information on a transaction-to-transaction basis with regard to sales of seamless and welded fittings.
Vendar pa so vse sodelujoče družbe predložile podatke na podlagi posameznih transakcij pri prodaji brezšivnega in varjenega pribora.
In the absence of any other comments in respect of comparison, the findings in recital 44 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 44 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It is recalled that the individual dumping margin provisionally established for one of the three cooperating exporting producers was determined on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with the company’s weighted average export price of the product concerned to the Union.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila individualna stopnja dampinga, ki je bila začasno določena za enega od treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti in tehtane povprečne izvozne cene zadevnega izdelka te družbe v Unijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of that company’s dumping margin, the provisional findings in recital 46 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo stopnje dampinga za to družbo ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 46 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The dumping calculations in respect of the two other cooperating companies showed that they conducted targeted dumping in terms of a given time period as well as in respect of given customers and regions.
Izračun dampinga za drugi dve sodelujoči družbi je pokazal, da sta družbi izvajali usmerjen damping, ki sta ga izvajali v določenem časovnem obdobju in je bil usmerjen na določene stranke ter regije.
Indeed, there was a clear pattern of their export prices which differed significantly among different purchasers and regions, as well as time periods (up to 30 % for identical models of the product concerned).
Jasen vzorec njunih izvoznih cen se je precej razlikoval glede na različne kupce in regije ter časovna obdobja (do 30 % za enak model zadevnega izdelka).
Furthermore, the dumping calculation based on the comparison of a weighted average normal value to a weighted average of export prices in accordance with the method provided in Article 2(11) first part of the first sentence of the basic Regulation did not reflect the full degree of dumping being practised by the two producers concerned, as demonstrated in recital 27 of this Regulation.
Poleg tega izračun dampinga na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtanim povprečjem izvoznih cen v skladu z metodo iz prvega dela prvega stavka člena 2(11) osnovne uredbe ni pokazal celotnega obsega dampinga, ki sta ga izvajala zadevna proizvajalca, kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi 27 te uredbe.
The dumping margin could also not be established by a comparison of individual normal values and individual export prices to the Union on a transaction-to-transaction basis in accordance with Article 2(11) second part of the first sentence of the basic Regulation, given the lack of sufficient domestic transactions for normal value corresponding to the export transactions as demonstrated in recital 28.
Stopnje dampinga ni bilo mogoče določiti niti s primerjavo posameznih normalnih vrednosti in posameznih izvoznih cen za Unijo na podlagi vsake posamične transakcije v skladu z drugim delom prvega stavka člena 2(11) osnovne uredbe, saj je primanjkovalo zadostnih domačih transakcij za normalne vrednosti, ki bi ustrezale izvoznim transakcijam, kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi 28.
Given that such method of comparison is an exception to the two first methods provided for in Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the Commission carefully checked whether the conditions to resort to it were clearly met in this case.
Ker je taka metoda primerjave izjema v primerjavi s prvima dvema metodama, določenima v členu 2(11) osnovne uredbe, je Komisija skrbno preučila, ali so bili pogoji zanjo v tem primeru jasno izpolnjeni.
The detailed dumping calculations, including the established export price patterns, have been disclosed.
Podrobni izračuni dampinga, vključno z ugotovljenimi vzorci izvoznih cen, so bili razkriti.
None of the Turkish exporting producers contested the underlying data.
Noben turški proizvajalec izvoznik ni nasprotoval osnovnim podatkom.
However, both cooperating companies, the ÇIB and the Turkish Government claimed that insufficient explanation had been provided as to the targeted dumping established for the two Turkish exporting producers and that in any event, any pattern of export prices was unintended.
Vendar so obe sodelujoči družbi, ÇIB in turška vlada trdili, da usmerjen damping, ugotovljen za turška proizvajalca izvoznika, ni bil dovolj pojasnjen in da v nobenem primeru vzorec izvoznih cen ni bil nameren.
In a hearing with the Hearing Officer, requested by the two Turkish exporters, detailed explanations were provided to the two companies with regard to the establishment of targeted dumping and the underlying dumping margin calculations.
Na zaslišanju s pooblaščencem za zaslišanje, ki sta ga zahtevala turška izvoznika, so bile družbama dane podrobne razlage glede ugotovitve usmerjenega dampinga in osnovnih izračunov stopnje dampinga.
The Commission also clarified that even if unintentional [5], their practices had the effect of targeted dumping.
Komisija je tudi pojasnila, da četudi je bilo njihovo delovanje nenamerno [5], pa je vseeno imelo učinek usmerjenega dampinga.
It is noted that the basic regulation does not require the investigating authority to identify potential reasons for targeted dumping, such as currency fluctuations, different regional pricing policies, etc. The mere establishment of patterns of export prices differing significantly among different purchasers, regions or time periods, is sufficient [6].
Opozoriti je treba, da osnovna uredba ne zahteva, da preiskovalni organ ugotovi morebitne razloge za usmerjeni damping, kot so nihanje menjalnega tečaja, različne regionalne politike določanja cen itd. Zadostuje ugotovitev vzorca izvoznih cen, ki se znatno razlikujejo med različnimi kupci, regijami ali časovnimi obdobji [6].
Further to the hearing, company-specific explanations have also been disclosed to the two companies.
Po zaslišanju so bila družbama razkrita tudi pojasnila za posamezno družbo.
Moreover, a Note Verbale has been sent to the Permanent Delegation of Turkey to the Union with clarifications on the establishment of targeted dumping and the methodology applied for the dumping margin calculation.
Poleg tega je bila na stalno predstavništvo Turčije pri Uniji naslovljena verbalna nota s pojasnili o ugotovitvi usmerjenega dampinga in metodologijo, ki je bila uporabljena za izračun stopnje dampinga.
Furthermore, in another hearing with the Hearing Officer, requested by the ÇIB, detailed explanations have been provided to the ÇIB with regard to the establishment of targeted dumping and the underlying dumping margin calculations.
Na drugem zaslišanju s pooblaščencem za zaslišanje, ki ga je zahtevalo združenje ÇIB, je bila združenju ÇIB dana tudi podrobna razlaga glede ugotovitve usmerjenega dampinga in osnovnih izračunov stopnje dampinga.
The investigation has established for each of the two exporting producers three clear patterns of export prices covering the vast majority of their export sales to the Union, i.e. export prices differed significantly among different purchasers and regions, as well as time periods, as was demonstrated by the underlying data disclosed to the parties.
Preiskava je za vsakega od dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov ugotovila tri jasne vzorce izvoznih cen, ki so pokrivali veliko večino njunega izvoza v Unijo, tj. izvozne cene so se znatno razlikovale glede na različne kupce in regije ter časovna obdobja, kot je bilo dokazano z osnovnimi podatki, ki so bili razkriti stranem.
This was the result of a thorough examination of the exceptional circumstances of this case, on the basis of which it was considered necessary to resort to targeted dumping.
To je bil rezultat temeljite preiskave izjemnih okoliščin tega primera, na podlagi katerega se je usmerjeni damping štel za nujnega.
Having established significant export price differences, and whereas only one of those three patterns of export prices would be sufficient to resort to the weighted average to all individual export transaction comparison methodology, this comparison method was considered appropriate in this particular case.
Ob ugotovitvi precejšnjih razlik med izvoznimi cenami, pri čemer bi samo eden od teh treh vzorcev izvoznih cen zadostoval za izbiro metodologije primerjanja tehtanega povprečja in vseh posameznih izvoznih transakcij, se je ta primerjalna metoda štela za ustrezno v tem določenem primeru.
Furthermore, for each of the two companies, the total amount of dumping established by comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price of the product concerned to the Union (the first symmetrical method) significantly differs from the amount of dumping established by comparison of the normal value established on a weighted average basis with prices of all individual export transactions to the Union (the asymmetrical method), as was demonstrated by the underlying data disclosed to the parties.
Poleg tega se za obe podjetji skupni obseg dampinga, ugotovljenega na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno zadevnega izdelka v Unijo (prva simetrična metoda), precej razlikuje od obsega dampinga, ugotovljenega s primerjavo normalne vrednosti, ugotovljene na podlagi tehtanega povprečja, s cenami vseh posameznih izvoznih transakcij v Unijo (asimetrična metoda), kot je bilo dokazano z osnovnimi podatki, ki so bili razkriti stranem.
Therefore it can be concluded that the use of the first symmetrical method would have the effect of inappropriately disguising the targeted dumping which took place during a specific time period, in specific regions and to specific customers.
Zato se lahko sklene, da bi uporaba prve simetrične metode lahko povzročila neprimerno prikrivanje usmerjenega dampinga, ki se je izvajal v določenem obdobju, v določenih regijah in z določenimi strankami.
In other words, the dumping margin established by the first symmetrical method would not reflect the full degree of dumping being practiced by the two companies concerned.
Z drugimi besedami, stopnja dampinga, ugotovljena s prvo simetrično metodo, ne bi odražala celotnega obsega dampinga, ki sta ga izvajali zadevni družbi.
The dumping margin could also not be established by a comparison of individual normal values with individual export prices to the Union on a transaction to transaction basis in accordance with Article 2(11) second part of the first sentence of the basic Regulation (the second symmetrical method).
Stopnje dampinga ni bilo mogoče določiti niti s primerjavo posameznih normalnih vrednosti s posameznimi izvoznimi cenami v Unijo na podlagi posamičnih transakcij v skladu z drugim delom prvega stavka člena 2(11) osnovne uredbe (druga simetrična metoda).
That method involves identifying individual domestic transactions which are comparable to individual export transactions, taking into account factors such as sales quantity and transaction date.
Ta metoda vključuje določitev posameznih domačih transakcij, ki so primerljive s posameznimi izvoznimi transakcijami, ob upoštevanju dejavnikov, kot so obseg prodaje in datum transakcije.
Given the lack of sufficient domestic transactions for normal value corresponding to the export transactions, it was not possible to establish the dumping margin on the basis of the second symmetrical method.
Glede na pomanjkanje zadostnih domačih transakcij za normalno vrednost, ki bi ustrezale izvoznim transakcijam, stopnje dampinga ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi druge simetrične metode.