natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The request, together with the accompanying documents, shall be submitted to the Commission’s mail reception service:
Zahtevek se skupaj s spremnimi dokumenti predloži osrednji poštni službi Komisije:
In addition to the formal written submission, the request and the accompanying documents shall also be submitted in electronic format.
Poleg uradnih pisnih vlog se v elektronski obliki predložijo tudi zahtevek in spremni dokumenti.
Any request submitted exclusively in electronic format will not be considered valid for the purposes of this Regulation.
Zahtevek, ki se predloži izključno v elektronski obliki, se za namene te uredbe ne šteje za veljavnega.
To facilitate information exchange and verification, in its application the requesting country shall inform the Commission of the contact person who is competent to handle the processing of the application.
Za olajšanje izmenjave informacij in preverjanj država prosilka v svoji vlogi Komisiji sporoči kontaktno osebo, ki je pristojna za obdelavo vloge.
The request shall be deemed to have been lodged on the first working day following its delivery to the Commission by registered mail or the issuing of an acknowledgement of receipt by the Commission.
Velja, da je zahtevek vložen prvi delovni dan po tem, ko ga Komisija prejme s priporočeno pošto, ali po tem, ko Komisija izda potrdilo o prejemu.
Examination of application
Preverjanje vloge
The Commission shall examine whether the conditions of Article 9(1) of the GSP Regulation have been met.
Komisija preveri, ali so pogoji iz člena 9(1) uredbe o GSP izpolnjeni.
When examining the request the Commission shall assess the most recent available conclusions of the monitoring bodies of the relevant conventions.
Pri preverjanju zahtevka Komisija upošteva najnovejše razpoložljive sklepne ugotovitve organov za spremljanje zadevnih konvencij.
Failure to provide the necessary information as required by Article 10(2) of the GSP Regulation or requested by the Commission may lead to termination of the examination and the rejection of the request.
Kadar informacije, ki jih zahteva člen 10(2) uredbe o GSP ali ki jih zahteva Komisija, niso predložene, se lahko preverjanje prekine in zahtevek zavrže.
The Commission shall finalise the examination of the request and decide whether to grant a requesting country the GSP+ arrangement within six months from the date of acknowledgement of receipt of the request.
Komisija zaključi preverjanje zahtevka in se odloči, ali bo državi prosilki dodelila režim GSP+ v šestih mesecih od datuma potrditve prejema zahtevka.
The Commission shall establish a constituted file.
Komisija pripravi dosje.
A constituted file shall contain the documents submitted by the requesting country and the relevant information which has been obtained by the Commission.
Dosje vsebuje dokumente, ki jih predloži država prosilka, in ustrezne informacije, ki jih pridobi Komisija.
The content of a constituted file shall comply with provisions of confidentiality in accordance with Article 38 of the GSP Regulation.
Vsebina dosjeja upošteva določbe o zaupnosti v skladu s členom 38 uredbe o GSP.
The requesting country has a right of the access to the constituted file.
Država prosilka ima pravico dostopa do dosjeja.
Upon written request, it may inspect all information contained in the constituted file except internal documents prepared by the Commission.
Na podlagi pisnega zahtevka je mogoče pregledati vse informacije v dosjeju, razen notranjih dokumentov, ki jih pripravi Komisija.
The Commission shall disclose the details underlying the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission’s decisions are taken.
Komisija razkrije podrobnosti, na katerih temeljijo bistvena dejstva in premisleki, na podlagi katerih sprejema odločitve.
Disclosure shall be given in writing.
Razkritje se izvede pisno.
It shall contain the Commission’s findings and shall reflect its provisional intention whether to grant a requesting country the GSP+ arrangement.
Vsebuje ugotovitve Komisije ter odraža njeno začasno namero, ali bo državi prosilki dodelila režim GSP+.
Disclosure shall be made, with due regard to the protection of confidential information, as soon as possible and, normally, not later than 45 days prior to a definitive decision by the Commission of any proposal for final action.
Razkritje se ob ustreznem upoštevanju varstva zaupnih informacij izvede čim prej oziroma običajno najpozneje 45 dni pred dokončno odločitvijo Komisije o predlogu dokončnih ukrepov.
Where the Commission is not in a position to disclose certain facts or considerations at that time, these shall be disclosed as soon as possible thereafter.
Če Komisija v tem času še ne more razkriti določenih dejstev ali premislekov, se ti razkrijejo pozneje v najkrajšem možnem času.
Disclosure shall not prejudice any subsequent decision which may be taken but where such decision is based on any different facts and considerations, these shall be disclosed as soon as possible.
To razkritje ne posega v nobeno morebitno poznejšo odločitev, toda če ta odločitev temelji na kakšnih drugačnih dejstvih ali premislekih, se ti razkrijejo v najkrajšem možnem času.
Submissions made after disclosure is given shall be taken into consideration only if received within a period to be set by the Commission in each case, which shall be at least 20 days, due consideration being given to the urgency of the matter.
Ugotovitve, predložene po razkritju, se upoštevajo samo, če so prejete v obdobju, ki ga za vsak primer določi Komisija in traja najmanj 20 dni, ob ustreznem upoštevanju nujnosti zadeve.
General hearing
Splošno zaslišanje
A requesting country has the right to be heard by the Commission.
Država prosilka ima pravico, da jo Komisija zasliši.
The requesting country shall submit a written request specifying the reasons for it to be heard orally.
Država prosilka predloži pisni zahtevek z navedbo razlogov za ustno zaslišanje.
Such a request shall be received by the Commission at the latest one month after the date of acknowledgement of receipt of the application.
Tak zahtevek Komisija prejme najpozneje en mesec po datumu potrditve prejema vloge.
Involvement of Hearing Officer
Posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje
On procedural grounds a requesting country may also request the intervention of the Hearing Officer of the Directorate-General for Trade.
Iz postopkovnih razlogov lahko država prosilka zahteva tudi posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje pri Generalnem direktoratu za trgovino.
The Hearing Officer shall review requests for access to the constituted file, disputes on the confidentiality of documents, requests for extension of time limits and requests of a requesting country to be heard.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje obravnava zahtevke za dostop do dosjeja, nestrinjanja v zvezi z zaupnostjo dokumentov, zahtevke za podaljšanje rokov in zahtevke države prosilke za zaslišanje.
If the requesting country has an oral hearing with the Hearing Officer the relevant Commission service shall participate in it.
Če pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ustno zasliši državo prosilko, pri tem sodeluje ustrezna služba Komisije.
Binding Undertaking
Zaveza
We, the Government of …, represented by …, in our capacity as …, express our commitment to maintain the ratification of the conventions listed in Annex VIII of the Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 and to ensure effective implementation thereof.
Vlada …, ki jo zastopamo … v funkciji …, se zavezuje k ohranjanju ratifikacije konvencij iz Priloge VIII k Uredbi (EU) št. 978/2012 in k zagotavljanju učinkovitega izvajanja teh konvencij.
We accept without reservation the reporting requirements imposed by each convention and regular monitoring and review of the implementation record in accordance with the provisions of the conventions listed in Annex VIII of the Regulation (EU) No 978/2012.
Brez pridržkov sprejemamo zahteve glede poročanja, ki jih določa posamezna konvencija, ter redno spremljanje in preglede uspešnosti izvajanja v skladu z določbami konvencij iz Priloge VIII k Uredbi (EU) št. 978/2012.
We express our commitment to participate in and cooperate with the monitoring procedure referred to in Article 13 of the Regulation (EU) No 978/2012.
Zavezujemo se k udeležbi in sodelovanju v postopku spremljanja iz člena 13 Uredbe (EU) št. 978/2012.
We fully accept that withdrawal of any of these commitments may result in removal of the GSP+ arrangement according to Article 10(5) of the Regulation (EU) No 978/2012.
V celoti se zavedamo, da bi neizpolnjevanje katere od teh zavez lahko povzročilo odpravo režima GSP+ v skladu s členom 10(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 978/2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 156/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 156/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 157/2013
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz bioetanola s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike
On 25 November 2011, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced, by a notice (‘NOI’) published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding (‘AD proceeding’ or ‘the proceeding’) with regard to imports into the Union of bioethanol originating in the United States of America (‘USA’ or ‘the country concerned’).
Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 25. novembra 2011 z obvestilom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku), objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: protidampinški postopek ali postopek) glede uvoza bioetanola s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZDA ali zadevna država).
On the same day, the Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of bioethanol originating in the USA and commenced a separate investigation (‘AS proceeding’).
Komisija je istega dne z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], objavila začetek protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom bioetanola s poreklom iz ZDA v Unijo in začela ločeno preiskavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: protisubvencijski postopek).
This proceeding was terminated on 21 December 2012 without imposition of countervailing measures.
Ta postopek je bil končan 21. decembra 2012 brez uvedbe izravnalnih ukrepov.
The AD proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 12 October 2011 by the European Producers Union of Renewable Ethanol Association (ePURE) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 %, of the total Union production of bioethanol.
Protidampinški postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 12. oktobra 2011 vložilo Združenje evropskih proizvajalcev obnovljivega etanola (ePURE) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje bioetanola Unije.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu navedenega izdelka in o dejanski škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za utemeljitev začetka preiskave.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, other known Union producers, the exporters/producers in the USA, importers, and other parties known to be concerned, and the authorities of the USA of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka obvestila pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, izvoznike/proizvajalce v ZDA, uvoznike, in druge strani, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter organe ZDA.
In view of the potentially large number of exporters/producers in the USA, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na morebitno veliko število izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v ZDA je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and if so, to select a sample, exporters/producers in the USA were asked to make themselves known within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to reply to a sampling form providing, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to production and sales of bioethanol during the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘the IP’).
Da bi se lahko Komisija odločila, ali bi bilo vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi lahko v primeru vzorčenja izbrala vzorec, je izvoznike/proizvajalce v ZDA pozvala, da se ji javijo v 15 dneh od datuma začetka preiskave in da odgovorijo na obrazec za vzorčenje, kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku, tako da predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih s proizvodnjo in prodajo bioetanola v obdobju od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The relevant US authorities were also consulted for the selection of a representative sample.
Glede izbire reprezentativnega vzorca je bilo opravljeno posvetovanje tudi z ustreznimi organi ZDA.
More than 60 exporters/producers made themselves known and provided the requested information within the 15 days deadline.
Javilo se je več kot 60 izvoznikov/proizvajalcev, ki so v roku 15 dni predložili zahtevane informacije.
In accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a sample based on the largest representative quantity of exports of bioethanol to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec na podlagi največje reprezentativne količine izvoza bioetanola v Unijo, ki ga je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
The sample selected consisted of six US bioethanol producers (‘US sample’).
Izbrani vzorec je vključeval šest ameriških proizvajalcev bioetanola (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vzorec ZDA).
During the investigation it was found that the production of one producer included in the US sample was not exported to the Union in the IP.
Med preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da se proizvodnja enega od proizvajalcev, vključenih v vzorec ZDA, v OP ni izvažala v Unijo.
This company was therefore removed from the sample.
Ta družba je bila zato izločena iz vzorca.
Despite the fact that the other sampled producers mentioned exports of bioethanol to the Union in their sampling form, the investigation showed that none of them exported bioethanol to the Union market.
Kljub temu da so drugi vzorčeni proizvajalci v svojih obrazcih za vzorčenje omenili izvoz bioetanola v Unijo, je preiskava pokazala, da ni nobeden od njih izvažal bioetanola na trg Unije.
In fact they were selling domestically to unrelated traders/blenders which then blended it with gasoline and resold it domestically and for export in particular to the Union.
Dejansko so ga na domačem trgu prodajali nepovezanim trgovcem/pripravljavcem mešanic, ki so ga nato mešali z bencinom ter prodajali na domačem trgu in za izvoz, zlasti v Unijo.
During the investigation on-spot, it became clear that in fact, contrary to the impression that had resulted from the information provided by the sampled US producers in their sampling forms, those producers were not systematically aware whether or not their production was intended for the Union market or any other destination including the US market and had no knowledge of the traders/blenders sales prices.
Med preiskavo na kraju samem je postalo jasno, da v nasprotju z vtisom, ki je bil ustvarjen na podlagi informacij, ki so jih v obrazcih za vzorčenje predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci iz ZDA, ti proizvajalci sistematično niso vedeli, ali je bila njihova proizvodnja namenjena trgu Unije ali kateri koli drugi destinaciji, vključno s trgom ZDA, in niso poznali prodajnih cen trgovcev/pripravljavcev mešanic.
In effect, this means that the US producers of bioethanol are not the exporters of the product concerned to the Union.
Posledično to pomeni, da proizvajalci bioetanola iz ZDA niso izvozniki zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
The exporters are in fact the traders/blenders.
Izvozniki so dejansko trgovci/pripravljavci mešanic.
Hence, the data collected and verified at the level of the US sample at provisional stage did not allow establishing whether or not US bioethanol was exported at dumped prices to the Union during the IP.
Zato na podlagi podatkov, ki so bili zbrani in preverjeni na ravni vzorca ZDA v začasni fazi, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali je bil bioetanol iz ZDA v Unijo izvožen po dampinških cenah v OP.
No anti-dumping measures could thus be imposed at that time.
Tako takrat ni bilo mogoče uvesti protidampinških ukrepov.
In order to identify the exports of bioethanol to the Union, the US sample relied mainly on data provided to them by the unrelated blenders/traders which were not investigated at provisional stage.
Da bi se ugotovil izvoz bioetanola v Unijo, so bili v vzorec ZDA zajeti predvsem podatki, ki so jih predložili nepovezani pripravljavci mešanic/trgovci, ki v začasni fazi niso bili vključeni v preiskavo.
Although at provisional stage one such trader cooperated in the investigation and provided additional data, that data was not sufficient to establish precisely and reliably the necessary data for the purpose of calculating dumping margins.
Čeprav je en tak trgovec v začasni fazi sodeloval pri preiskavi in predložil dodatne podatke, ti podatki niso bili zadostni, da bi se pridobili natančni in zanesljivi podatki, ki so potrebni za računanje stopenj dampinga.
In order to complete the dumping investigation, it was thus considered necessary to rather base it on the data of traders and blenders which were actually exporting the product concerned to the Union.
Zato je bilo za dokončanje dampinške preiskave potrebno, da se uporabijo podatki trgovcev in pripravljavcev mešanic, ki so dejansko izvažali zadevni izdelek v Unijo.
Dumping questionnaires were thus sent to the eight largest US traders/blenders that were identified during the investigation of the US sample.
Vprašalniki o dampingu so bili tako poslani osmim največjim trgovcem/pripravljavcem mešanic iz ZDA, ki so bili opredeljeni v preiskavi vzorca ZDA.
These traders/blenders represent over 90 % of total exports of bioethanol to the Union.
Ti trgovci/pripravljavci mešanic predstavljajo več kot 90 % skupnega izvoza bioetanola v Unijo.
Two agreed to cooperate in the investigation and their exports represent about 51 % of total exports of bioethanol to the Union during the IP.
Dva sta privolila v sodelovanje pri preiskavi in njun izvoz je v OP predstavljal približno 51 % skupnega izvoza bioetanola v Unijo.
In view of the potentially large number of Union producers, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Ker lahko postopek vključuje visoko število proizvajalcev Unije, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In the notice of initiation the Commission announced that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers (‘EU sample’).
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku sporočila, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vzorec EU).
This sample consisted of five companies and groups, out of the 19 Union producers that were known prior to the initiation of the investigation.
Ta vzorec je vključeval pet družb in skupin med 19 proizvajalci Unije, ki so bili znani pred začetkom preiskave.
This sample represented 48 % of the total estimated Union production during the IP.
Vzorec je predstavljal 48 % celotne ocenjene proizvodnje Unije v OP.
But the investigation revealed that the groups included in the EU sample consisted of a large number of companies or single entities producing and selling the like product.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da so bile skupine, vključene v vzorec EU, sestavljene iz velikega števila družb ali posameznih subjektov, ki proizvajajo in prodajajo podobni izdelek.
In this case it would have meant to investigate 13 companies and it was not possible to investigate all of them given the time available for the investigation.
V tem primeru bi to pomenilo, da bi bilo treba preiskati 13 družb, vendar v času, ki je bil na voljo za preiskavo, vseh ni bilo mogoče preiskati.
It was thus decided to re-examine the data available for the selection of a representative sample.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se ponovno preučijo podatki, ki so bili na voljo za izbiro reprezentativnega vzorca.
It was considered that the sample should be based on the largest individual producing entities in the Union and in the groups taking also into account a certain geographical spread amongst Union producers.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da bi moral vzorec temeljiti na največjih posameznih proizvodnih subjektih v Uniji in v skupinah, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi določeno geografsko porazdelitev proizvajalcev Unije.
Hence, a definitive EU sample of six individual producers was ultimately selected based on representativity in terms of the production and sales volume of bioethanol during the IP and the geographical location of the producer.
Zato je bil nazadnje na podlagi reprezentativnosti v smislu obsega proizvodnje in prodaje bioetanola v OP ter geografske lokacije proizvajalca izbran dokončen vzorec EU šestih posameznih proizvajalcev.
These producers located in Belgium, the Netherlands, France, UK, Sweden and Germany represent 36 % of the total estimated Union production and 44 % of the total production reported by the companies that submitted data for the selection of a sample.
Ti proizvajalci iz Belgije, Nizozemske, Francije, Združenega kraljestva, Švedske in Nemčije predstavljajo 36 % celotne ocenjene proizvodnje Unije in 44 % skupne proizvodnje, ki so jo sporočile družbe, ki so predložile podatke za izbiro vzorca.
This sample was deemed to be representative for the examination of possible injury to the Union industry.
Ta vzorec je štel za reprezentativnega za preiskavo v zvezi z morebitno škodo za industrijo Unije.
Some parties claimed that the EU sample was less representative than the one originally selected which included complete groups of companies.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je bil vzorec EU manj reprezentativen od prvotno izbranega vzorca, v katerega so bile vključene celotne skupine družb.
In their view, an objective analysis of the situation of the Union industry could only be made by including all companies which are part of groups in the sample.
Po njihovem mnenju bi bilo mogoče objektivno analizo položaja industrije Unije izvesti samo, tako da bi bile vanjo vključene vse družbe, ki so vključene v skupine v vzorcu.
They alleged in particular that costs and revenues could be allocated to certain companies of a group which are not visited and may thus not be reflected in the injury analysis.
Trdile so predvsem, da bi bilo mogoče stroške in prihodke prenesti na nekatere družbe iz skupine, pri katerih se ne bodo izvedli preveritveni obiski, in tako ne bi bili izraženi v analizi škode.
In this respect it should be noted that the Commission duly considered and examined the data provided by all sampled and non-sampled companies and in particular the companies belonging to groups, in order to ensure that all costs and revenues involved in the production and sale by the companies selected in the sample had been fully and correctly reflected in the injury analysis.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je Komisija ustrezno obravnavala in preučila podatke, ki so jih predložile vse vzorčene in nevzorčene družbe ter zlasti družbe, ki so vključene v skupine, da bi zagotovila, da so bili vsi stroški in prihodki, povezani s proizvodnjo in prodajo, ki jo izvajajo družbe, izbrane v vzorec, celovito in pravilno upoštevani pri analizi škode.
Some parties contested the inclusion in the EU sample of Union producers which were in a start-up phase.
Nekatere strani so nasprotovale vključitvi proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili v fazi zagona, v vzorec EU.