natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the “Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)” apparatus and the assessment method related thereto, details of which are given in Part II of the Annex to this Decision.’;
naprava ‚Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)‘ in z njo povezana metoda ocenjevanja, ki sta podrobno opredeljeni v delu II Priloge k temu sklepu.“;
Decision 89/449/EEC is repealed.
Odločba 89/449/EGS se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 14 August 2013.
V Bruslju, 14. avgusta 2013
Commission Decision 89/449/EEC of 17 July 1989 authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Greece (OJ L 214, 25.7.1989, p. 17).
Odločba Komisije 89/449/EGS z dne 17. julija 1989 o odobritvi metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Grčiji (UL L 214, 25.7.1989, str. 17).
Commission Decision 2010/642/EU of 25 October 2010 authorising a method for grading pig carcases in Greece (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 60).
Sklep Komisije 2010/642/EU z dne 25. oktobra 2010 o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Grčiji (UL L 280, 26.10.2010, str. 60).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 of 10 December 2008 laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcases and the reporting of prices thereof (OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p. 3).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1249/2008 z dne 10. decembra 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo lestvic Skupnosti za razvrščanje trupov goved, prašičev in ovac ter sporočanje njihovih cen (UL L 337, 16.12.2008, str. 3).
METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASES IN GREECE
METODE ZA RAZVRŠČANJE PRAŠIČJIH TRUPOV V GRČIJI
The rules provided for in this Part shall apply when the grading of pig carcases is carried out by means of the apparatus known as “OptiScan-TP”.
Pravila iz tega dela se uporabljajo, kadar se razvrščanje prašičjih trupov opravi z napravo, imenovano ‚OptiScan-TP‘.
The Optiscan-TP apparatus shall be equipped with a digital imager taking an illuminated photo of the two measurement points on the carcases.
Naprava Optiscan-TP je opremljena z digitalno elektronsko napravo za snemanje in obdelavo slik, s katero je mogoče narediti osvetljeno sliko dveh merilnih točk na trupu.
The images shall be the base for the calculation of fat and muscle thickness according to the two points method “Zwei-Punkte Messverfahren (ZP)”.
Slike so osnova za izračun debeline slanine in mišic v skladu z metodo dveh točk ‚Zwei-Punkte Messverfahren (ZP)‘.
The photos shall be saved and can later be controlled.
Slike se shranijo in se lahko pozneje preverijo.
The lean meat content of the carcase shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Vsebnost pustega mesa trupa se izračuna v skladu z naslednjo enačbo:
Formula for grading pig carcases presented in accordance with the first sentence of point B.III of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007:
Enačba za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov, predstavljenih v skladu s prvim stavkom točke B.III Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007:
Ŷ the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcase,
Ŷ ocenjeni odstotek pustega mesa trupa,
the minimal thickness of fat (including rind) in millimetres, over the M. gluteus medius,
najmanjša debelina slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih nad mišico M. gluteus medius,
Formula for grading dehided pig carcases:
Enačba za razvrščanje odrtih prašičjih trupov:
the minimal thickness of fat (without rind) in millimetres, over the M. gluteus medius,
najmanjša debelina slanine (brez kože) v milimetrih nad mišico M. gluteus medius,
These formulas shall be valid for carcases weighing between 50 and 110 kilograms.
Enačbi veljata za trupe, ki tehtajo med 50 in 110 kilogrami.
The rules provided for in this Part shall apply when the grading of pig carcases is carried out by means of the apparatus known as “Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)”.
Pravila, določena v tem delu, se uporabljajo, kadar se razvrščanje prašičjih trupov opravi z napravo, imenovano ‚Hennessy grading probe (HGP 4)‘.
the thickness of back-fat (without rind) in millimetres, measured at 6 centimetres off the midline of the carcase between the third and fourth last ribs,
debelina hrbtne slanine (brez kože) v milimetrih, merjena 6 centimetrov od vzdolžne osi trupa med tretjim in četrtim zadnjim rebrom,
of 16 August 2013
z dne 16. avgusta 2013
in application of Article 7 of Directive 94/9/EC of the European Parliament and the Council as regards a prohibition measure adopted by the Swedish authorities in respect of a fluorescent lamp ‘GW 80 455’ (ATEX-SE-01-2012)
v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 94/9/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede ukrepa prepovedi, ki so ga sprejeli švedski organi v zvezi s fluoresenčno sijalko „GW 80 455“ (ATEX-SE-01-2012)
(notified under document C(2013) 5315)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 5315)
Having regard to Directive 94/9/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 March 1994 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres [1] (the ATEX Directive), and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 94/9/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. marca 1994 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z opremo in zaščitnimi sistemi, namenjenimi za uporabo v potencialno eksplozivnih atmosferah [1] (Direktiva ATEX), in zlasti člena 7 Direktive,
On 2 October 2012, the authorities of Sweden formally notified to the European Commission a prohibition measure, taken on 19 September 2012, concerning the placing on the market of a fluorescent lamp, mark and type ‘GW 80 455’, manufactured by Gewiss SpA, via A. Volta 1, 24069 Cenate Sotto (Bergamo), Italy
Švedski organi so Evropsko komisijo 2. oktobra 2012 uradno obvestili o ukrepu prepovedi, sprejetem 19. septembra 2012, v zvezi z dajanjem na trg fluoresenčne sijalke znamke in tipa „GW 80 455“, ki jo proizvaja Gewiss S.p.A., via A. Volta 1, 24069 Cenate Sotto (Bergamo), Italija
The Swedish authorities indicated that their measure was based on the non-conformity of the product with the essential health and safety requirements referred to in Article 3 of the Directive 94/9/EC and set out in Annex II, in particular in points 1.0.5 (Marking) and 1.0.6 (Instructions), related to the incorrect application or shortcomings of the harmonised standard EN 60079-0:2006 — Electrical apparatus for explosive gas atmospheres — Part 0: General requirements (IEC 60079-0:2004, modified), which is referred in the manufacturer’s EC Declaration of Conformity.
Švedski organi so navedli, da je bil ukrep sprejet zaradi neskladnosti izdelka z bistvenimi zdravstvenimi in varnostnimi zahtevami, navedenimi v členu 3 in določenimi v Prilogi II k Direktivi 94/9/ES, zlasti v točkah 1.0.5 (Označevanje) in 1.0.6 (Navodila), v zvezi z nepravilno uporabo in pomanjkljivostmi usklajenega standarda EN 60079-0:2006 – Električne naprave za potencialno eksplozivne atmosfere – 0. del: Splošne zahteve (IEC 60079-0:2004, spremenjen), ki je naveden v izjavi o skladnosti ES proizvajalca.
Serious criticism:
Resna kritika:
Accompanying instructions (sub-clause 30.1 in EN 60079-0:2006): the marking ‘Potential electrostatic charging hazard – See instructions’ refers to the instructions for further information.
Priložena navodila [pododstavek 30.1 v EN 60079-0:2006]: oznaka „Potencialna nevarnost elektrostatičnega napajanja – glej navodila“ se nanaša na nadaljnje informacije v navodilih.
Such information can not be found in the instructions.
Takih informacij v navodilih ni mogoče najti.
Criticism:
Kritike:
Marking (sub-clause 29.1 in EN 60079-0:2006) — If the lamp is mounted directly on a ceiling, it is difficult to see part of the marking on the label (Ex code and ambient temperature on the upper part of the label).
Označevanje [pododstavek 29.1 v EN 60079-0:2006] – če je sijalka pritrjena neposredno na strop, je del oznake na nalepki slabo viden (oznaka ex in temperatura okolja na zgornjem delu nalepke).
Marking (sub-clause 29.2(z1) in EN 60079-0:2006) — Explosion group (II, IIA, IIB or IIC) is missing in the Ex code.
Označevanje [pododstavek 29.2 z1) v EN 60079-0:2006] – na oznaki ex ni navedena eksplozijska zaščitna skupina (II, IIA, IIB ali IIC).
Marking (sub-clause 29.1 in EN 60079-0:2006) — Address of the manufacturer is missing.
Označevanje [pododstavek 29.1 v EN 60079-0:2006)] – ni naveden naslov proizvajalca.
Accompanying instructions (sub-clause 30.1 in EN 60079-0:2006) — The instructions are not in Swedish (they are in five other languages incl. Italian, English, French and German).
Priložena navodila [pododstavek 30.1 v EN 60079-0:2006] – ni navodil v švedščini (navodila so v petih drugih jezikih, vključno z italijanščino, angleščino, francoščino in nemščino).
Accompanying instructions (sub-clause 30.1 in EN 60079-0:2006) — Marked information shall be recapitulated in the instructions.
Priložena navodila [pododstavek 30.1 v EN 60079-0:2006] – označene informacije naj bi bile ponovljene v navodilih.
Some of this information can not be found in the instructions:
Nekaterih informacij v navodilih ni mogoče najti:
Warning text in the marking (or corresponding text which describes the warnings) is missing in the instructions.
v navodilih ni opozorila z oznake (ali ustreznega besedila, ki opisuje opozorila);
Temperature class ‘T3’ (for gas) and maximum temperature ‘T78 °C’ (for dust) for the lamp, can not be found in the instructions.
v navodilih ni mogoče najti temperaturnega razreda „T3“ (za plin) in najvišje temperature „T78 °C“ (za prah) za sijalko;
Explosion group (II, IIA, IIB or IIC), which shall be included in the Ex code according to 29.2(e) in EN 60079-0:2006, can not be found in the instructions.
v navodilih ni mogoče najti eksplozijske zaščitne skupine (II, IIA, IIB ali IIC), ki bi morala biti v skladu s pododstavkom 29.2(e) v EN 60079-0:2006 vključena v oznako ex.
On 6 November 2012, the Commission wrote to the manufacturer, Gewiss SpA, inviting them to communicate their observations regarding the measure taken by the Swedish authorities.
Komisija je dne 6. novembra 2012 pisala proizvajalcu Gewiss S.p.A in ga pozvala, naj ji sporoči svoje pripombe glede ukrepa, ki so ga sprejeli švedski organi.
On 11 January 2013, Gewiss SpA replied, providing specific answers and technical analysis for each one of the deviations pointed out by the Swedish authorities:
Gewiss S.p.A. je odgovoril 11. januarja 2013 ter predložil posamezne odgovore in tehnično analizo za vsa odstopanja, na katera so opozorili švedski organi:
Regarding the ‘serious criticism’ on accompanying instructions, the manufacturer indicated that the marking and the instructions have been developed according to the risk assessment of the product for gases and dusts, in order to comply with the specific requirements of the relevant harmonised standard.
glede „resne kritike“ v zvezi s priloženimi navodili je proizvajalec navedel, da je oznako in navodila pripravil v skladu z oceno tveganja izdelka za pline in prah, da bi zadostil posebnim zahtevam ustreznega harmoniziranega standarda.
In particular, information on ‘potential electrostatic charging hazard’ is reproduced on the product itself within a general interpretation of the term ‘instructions’, diverging from the interpretation of the Swedish authorities who make reference to ‘accompanying instructions’.
Zlasti so informacije o „potencialni nevarnosti elektrostatičnega napajanja“ v okviru splošnega tolmačenja pojma „navodila“, ki se razlikuje od tolmačenja švedskih organov, ki se sklicujejo na „priložena navodila“, ponovno navedene na samem izdelku,
Regarding the ‘criticisms’, the manufacturer indicated that the deviations are not really critical, being related to possible differences in interpretation of the relevant clauses of the standard.
glede „kritik“ je proizvajalec navedel, da odstopanja v dejansko niso tako kritična, saj se nanašajo na možne razlike v tolmačenju zadevnih odstavkov v standardu.
In its reply, the manufacturer underlined that accompanying instructions and marking of the product have been improved and modified according to the most recent versions of the applicable harmonised standards (2009, 2010 and 2012).
V odgovoru je proizvajalec poudaril, da so bila priložena navodila in oznaka izdelka izboljšana in spremenjena v skladu z najnovejšimi različicami veljavnih harmoniziranih standardov (2009, 2010 in 2012).
In fact, the product based on the 2006 version of the harmonised standard EN 60079-0 is no longer available on the EU market.
Izdelek, ki temelji na verziji harmoniziranega standarda EN 60079-0 iz leta 2006, na trgu EU dejansko ni več na voljo.
Copies of the new markings, instructions and Declaration of Conformity of the product are provided in the reply; in particular, accompanying instructions are available now also in Swedish.
Odgovoru so priložene kopije novih oznak, navodil in izjave o skladnosti izdelka; zlasti so priložena navodila zdaj na voljo tudi v švedščini.
The Swedish authorities produced no further documentation after the reply of the manufacturer.
Švedski organi po odgovoru proizvajalca niso predložili nadaljnje dokumentacije.
In light of the documentation available, and the comments of the parties concerned, the Commission considers that the fluorescent lamp, mark and type ‘GW 80 455’, in its configuration as analysed by the Swedish authorities making reference to the harmonised standard EN 60079-0:2006, failed to comply with the essential health and safety requirements referred to in Article 3 of the Directive 94/9/EC and set out in Annex II, in particular in points 1.0.5 (Marking) and 1.0.6 (Instructions).
Komisija glede na razpoložljivo dokumentacijo ter pripombe zadevnih strani meni, da fluoresenčna sijalka znamke in tipa „GW 80 455“ v svoji konfiguraciji, ki so jo, sklicujoč se na harmonizirani standard EN 60079-0:2006, analizirali švedski organi, ni izpolnjevala bistvenih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev, ki so navedene v členu 3 in določene v Prilogi II k Direktivi 94/9/ES, zlasti v točkah 1.0.5 (Označevanje) in 1.0.6 (Navodila).
These non-conformities and the related technical deficiencies gave rise to serious risks for users because they refer to essential health and safety requirements, established in Annex II to Directive 94/9/EC, which had not been fulfilled by the product, taking into consideration that:
Ta neskladnost in povezane tehnične pomanjkljivosti so pomenile resno tveganje za uporabnike, saj se nanašajo na bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz Priloge II k Direktivi 94/9/ES, ki jih izdelek ob upoštevanju naslednjega ni izpolnjeval:
for the ‘serious criticism’, the reference to ‘instructions’ is to be interpreted as the ‘accompanying instructions’, according to point 1.0.6(a) of Annex II, and not in a general manner as instruction in any kind of form,
v zvezi z „resno kritiko“ je treba „navodila“ razlagati kot „priložena navodila“ v skladu s točko 1.0.6(a) Priloge II, ne pa na splošno kot navodila v kateri koli obliki,
for the ‘criticisms’, the missing elements in markings and instructions have been detected with regard not to different interpretations of the standard, but directly to the specific prescriptions of points 1.0.5 and 1.0.6(a) and (b) of Annex II,
v zvezi s „kritiko“ manjkajoči elementi v označevanju in navodilih niso bili odkriti v povezavi z različnimi razlagami standarda, ampak v neposredni povezavi s posebnimi predpisi iz točke 1.0.5 ter točke 1.0.6(a) in (b) Priloge II –
The measure taken by the authorities of Sweden prohibiting the placing on the market of a fluorescent lamp, mark and type ‘GW 80 455’, formerly manufactured by Gewiss SpA, referred to the 2006 edition of standard EN 60079-0 and now obsolete, is justified.
Ukrep švedskih organov za prepoved dajanja na trg fluoresenčne sijalke znamke in tipa „GW 80 455“, ki jo je, sklicujoč se na različico standarda EN 60079-0 iz leta 2006, ki je zdaj zastarela, nekoč proizvajal Gewiss S.p.A., je upravičen.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2013.
V Bruslju, 16. avgusta 2013
The Swedish authorities submitted the test report on examination of explosion protection lamp, dated 3 April 2012.
Švedski organi so predložili poročilo o pregledu sijalke, odporne proti eksplozijam, 3. aprila 2012.
According to the Swedish authorities, the list of deviations includes:
Navajajo naslednji seznam odstopanj:
of 19 August 2013
z dne 19. avgusta 2013
concerning certain protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H7N7 in Italy
o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H7N7 v Italiji
(notified under document C(2013) 5521)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 5521)
Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence.
Okužba domače perutnine z virusi aviarne influence povzroča dve glavni obliki navedene bolezni, ki se ločita po virulenci.
Italy notified the Commission of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H7N7 in a holding on its territory where poultry or other captive birds are kept and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones, which should be defined in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.
Italija je Komisijo obvestila o izbruhu visoko patogene aviarne influence podtipa H7N7 na gospodarstvu na svojem ozemlju, kjer gojijo perutnino ali druge ptice v ujetništvu, ter nemudoma uvedla ukrepe v skladu z Direktivo 2005/94/ES, vključno z vzpostavitvijo okuženih in ogroženih območij, ki bi jih bilo treba opredeliti v delih A in B Priloge k temu sklepu.
The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with Italy, and it is satisfied that the borders of those zones established by the competent authority in that Member State are at a sufficient distance to the actual holding where the outbreak was confirmed.
Komisija je v sodelovanju z Italijo preučila navedene ukrepe in presodila, da so meje navedenih območij, ki jih je vzpostavil pristojni organ v navedeni državi članici, dovolj oddaljene od dejanskega gospodarstva, na katerem je bil izbruh potrjen.
In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly define those zones established in Italy at Union level and to provide that no consignments of live poultry, ready-to-lay poultry, day-old chicks and hatching eggs are dispatched from those zones to other Member States or to third countries.
Za preprečitev kakršnih koli nepotrebnih motenj za trgovino v Uniji in v izogib tveganju, da tretje države sprejmejo neupravičene omejitve trgovanja, je treba na ravni Unije nemudoma opredeliti navedena območja v Italiji in zagotoviti, da se pošiljke z živo perutnino, perutnino na začetku nesnosti, enodnevnimi piščanci in valilnimi jajci ne odpremijo z navedenih območij v druge države članice ali tretje države.
Italy shall ensure that the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC comprise at least the areas listed in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.
Italija zagotovi, da okužena in ogrožena območja, vzpostavljena v skladu s členom 16(1) Direktive 2005/94//ES, obsegajo vsaj območja iz delov A in B Priloge k temu sklepu.
This Decision shall apply until 23 September 2013.
Ta sklep se uporablja do 23. septembra 2013.
This Decision is addressed to Italian Republic.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Italijo.
Done at Brussels, 19 August 2013.
V Bruslju, 19. avgusta 2013
Protection zone as referred to in Article 1:
Okuženo območje, kot je navedeno v členu 1:
Area comprising the municipality of:
Območje, ki zajema občino:
Surveillance zone as referred to in Article 1:
Ogroženo območje, kot je navedeno v členu 1:
Area comprising the municipalities of:
Območje, ki zajema občine:
of 20 August 2013
z dne 20. avgusta 2013
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan
o ustavitvi protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza pribora (fitingov) za varjenje cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, dokončanega ali nedokončanega, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana
On 28 September 2012, the European Commission received a complaint concerning the alleged injurious dumping of stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) and in Taiwan, lodged pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation by the Defence Committee of the Stainless Steel Butt-welding Fittings Industry of the European Union (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of the total Union production of stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings.
Evropska komisija je 28. septembra 2012 prejela pritožbo o domnevnem škodljivem dampingu pribora (fitingov) za varjenje cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, dokončanega ali nedokončanega, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in Tajvana, ki jo je v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe vložil Obrambni odbor industrije fitingov iz nerjavnega jekla za soležno varjenje Evropske unije („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večino, v tem primeru več kot 25 %, celotne proizvodnje Unije priborov (fitingov) za varjenje cevi iz nerjavnega jekla.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of the existence of dumping and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu in o posledični znatni škodi, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka protidampinškega postopka.
On 10 November 2012, the Commission, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the PRC and in Taiwan.
Komisija je 10. novembra 2012 po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom z objavo obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza pribora (fitingov) za varjenje cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, dokončanega ali nedokončanega, s poreklom iz LRK in Tajvana v Unijo.
The Commission officially advised the exporters/producers in the PRC and in Taiwan, importers, users and any associations known to be concerned, the authorities of the PRC and of Taiwan and all known Union producers of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila proizvajalce/izvoznike v LRK in na Tajvanu, uvoznike, uporabnike in vsa združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, pristojne organe v LRK in na Tajvanu ter vse znane proizvajalce Unije.
All interested parties who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje ter dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo to odobreno.
By a letter of 27 June 2013 to the Commission, the complainant formally withdrew its complaint.
Pritožnik je v pismu Komisiji z dne 27. junija 2013 uradno umaknil svojo pritožbo.
The investigation has not brought to light any considerations showing that such termination would be against the Union interest.
V preiskavi ni bilo ugotovljeno, da taka ustavitev ni v interesu Unije.
However, the Commission received no comments which would justify that such a termination would not be in the Union interest.
Vendar pa Komisija ni prejela pripomb, ki bi kazale, da takšna ustavitev ni v interesu Unije.
The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of stainless steel tube and pipe butt-welding fittings, whether or not finished, originating in the PRC and in Taiwan should be terminated,
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je treba protidampinški postopek glede uvoza pribora (fitingov) za varjenje cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, dokončanega ali nedokončanega, s poreklom iz LRK in Tajvana ustaviti –