natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This programme is considered a subsidy in the form of revenue forgone by the GOC within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) as FIEs and other eligible domestic enterprises are relieved from payment of VAT and/or tariffs otherwise due if they did not obtain the relevant NDRC certificate of State-encouraged project.
Ta program se šteje kot subvencija v obliki opuščenega prihodka kitajske vlade v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe, saj so subjekti, v katere se vlaga tuji kapital, in druge domače družbe upravičenke izvzeti iz plačila DDV in/ali drugih tarif, ki so sicer zapadle, če niso pridobili ustreznega certifikata agencije NDRC projekta, ki ga spodbuja država.
It therefore confers a benefit on the recipient companies in the sense of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zato ta program družbam prejemnicam prinaša ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe.
The programme is specific within the meaning of Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation since the legislation pursuant to which the granting authority operates limits its access to enterprises that invest under specific business categories defined exhaustively by law and obtaining the Certificate of State-encouraged Projects.
Ta program je specifičen v smislu člena 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe, saj je sama zakonodaja, v skladu s katero deluje organ, ki dodeljuje subvencije, omejila dostop do te sheme na družbe, ki vlagajo v okviru posebnih poslovnih kategorij, izrecno opredeljenih z zakonom, in ki so pridobile certifikat projektov, spodbujanih s strani države.
In addition, there are no objective criteria to limit eligibility for this programme and no conclusive evidence to conclude that eligibility is automatic under Article 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega ni objektivnih meril za omejitev upravičenosti in prepričljivih dokazov za sklep na podlagi člena 4(2)(b) osnovne uredbe, da je upravičenost samodejna.
The benefit conferred on the recipients is considered to be the amount of VAT and duties exempted on imported equipment.
Kot ugodnost za prejemnike se šteje znesek oprostitev plačila DDV in dajatev za uvoženo opremo.
In the absence of information for the assessment of this benefit and since this programme has already been examined in a previous CVD proceeding by the Union, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been the assessment made for this programme in the Coated Fine Paper investigation, duly adjusted if needed as mentioned in recital (252) above.
Ob odsotnosti informacij za oceno te ugodnosti in ker je Unija ta program že preiskala v drugem protisubvencijskem postopku v preteklosti, je bila najprimernejši vir informacij, da bi se ocenile ugodnosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ocena tega programa iz preiskave v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem, po potrebi ustrezno prilagojena, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (252).
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,89 % which is the arithmetical average of the rates established for this programme in the Coated Fine Paper investigation.
Stopnja subvencije za to shemo v OP, določena na tak način za vse nesodelujoče družbe, znaša 0,89 %, ter je enaka aritmetičnemu povprečju stopenj za ta program, določenih v preiskavi v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem.
This programme provides benefits in the form of VAT refunds for the purchase of domestically produced equipment by FIEs.
Ta program zagotavlja ugodnosti v obliki povračila DDV za nakup na domačem trgu proizvedene opreme za subjekte, v katere se vlaga tuji kapital.
The equipment must not fall into the –Non-Exemptible Catalogue and the value of the equipment must not exceed the total investment limit on an FIE according to the 'trial Administrative Measures on Purchase of Domestically Produced Equipment'.
Ta oprema ne sme biti uvrščena v katalog opreme, ki ni izvzeta iz plačila, in vrednost opreme ne sme preseči skupne omejitve naložb subjekta, v katerega se vlaga tuji kapital, v skladu s „poskusnimi upravnimi ukrepi za nakup na domačem trgu proizvedene opreme“.
This programme was countervailed by the Union in the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning Coated Fine Paper [74] and by the US authorities in a countervailing duty proceedings concerning Coated Free Sheet from the PRC [75].
Proti temu programu so Unija v protisubvencijskem postopku v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem [74] in organi ZDA v postopkih o izravnalnih dajatvah v zvezi s premazanim papirjem brez lesovine iz LRK [75] uvedli izravnalne ukrepe.
The GOC simply referred to the replies of the sampled producers for information relating to any benefits that may have been received pursuant to this programme.
Kitajska vlada se je v zvezi z informacijami glede kakršnih koli ugodnosti, ki so jih vzorčeni proizvajalci mogoče prejeli na podlagi tega programa, zgolj sklicevala na njihove odgovore.
The Commission refers to its arguments on the request to the GOC to provide full replies (recitals (34) and following above).
Komisija se na tem mestu sklicuje na svoje utemeljitve zahteve, da kitajska vlada predloži popolne odgovore (uvodna izjava (34) in naprej).
This programme is considered a subsidy in the form of revenue forgone by the GOC within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) and thus conferring a benefit to the recipient companies in the sense of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
Ta program se šteje kot subvencija v obliki opuščenega prihodka kitajske vlade v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe, ki je družbam prejemnicam prinesel ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe.
The programme is specific within the meaning of Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation given that the legislation itself pursuant to which the granting authority operates limits its access to certain enterprises (FIEs) for purchase of equipment not falling into the Catalogue of non-exemptible equipment.
Ta program je specifičen v smislu člena 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe, saj je sama zakonodaja, v skladu s katero deluje organ, ki dodeljuje subvencije, omejila dostop do te sheme na samo nekatere družbe (subjekte, v katere se vlaga tuji kapital), za nakup opreme, ki ni izvzeta iz plačila.
There is no indication of non-specificity according to Article 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation because there are no objective criteria to limit eligibility for this programme and no conclusive evidence to conclude that eligibility is automatic.
Nič ne omogoča sklepa, da ta program ni specifičen v skladu s členom 4(2)(b) osnovne uredbe, saj zanj ni objektivnih meril za omejitev upravičenosti in prepričljivih dokazov za sklep, da je upravičenost samodejna.
In addition, the programme is also specific within the terms of Article 4(4)(b) of the basic Regulation as the subsidy is contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods.
Poleg tega je program tudi specifičen v smislu člena 4(4)(b) osnovne uredbe, saj je subvencija pogojena z uporabo domačega blaga pred uvoženim.
The benefit conferred on the recipients is considered to be the amount of VAT reimbursed on the purchase of domestically produced equipment.
Kot ugodnost za prejemnike se šteje znesek povračila DDV za nakup na domačem trgu proizvedene opreme.
In the absence of information for the assessment of this benefit and since this programme has already been examined in a previous CVD proceeding by the Union, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been the assessment made for this programme in the Coated Fine Paper proceeding, duly adjusted if needed as mentioned in recital (252) above.
Ob odsotnosti informacij za oceno te ugodnosti in ker je Unija ta program že preiskala v drugem protisubvencijskem postopku v preteklosti, je bila najprimernejši vir informacij, da bi se ocenile ugodnosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ocena tega programa iz postopka v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem, po potrebi ustrezno prilagojena, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (252).
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,04 % which is the arithmetical average of the rates established for this programme in the Coated Fine Paper proceeding.
Stopnja subvencije, določena na tak način za vse nesodelujoče družbe, znaša 0,04 %, in je enaka aritmetičnemu povprečju stopenj za ta program, določenih v postopku v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem.
This programme covers VAT taxpayers mainly active in certain listed industries, including the metallurgical industry.
Za program zajema zavezance za plačilo DDV, katerih glavna dejavnost je v nekaterih navedenih industrijah, vključno z industrijo metalurgije.
The programme provides that eligible VAT taxpayers located in 26 cities of the old industrial bases of the central region that make investments in certain fixed assets can deduct the amount of VAT paid on the fixed assets from its total VAT payable.
Ta program določa, da lahko upravičenci, ki so zavezanci za plačilo DDV iz 26 mest starih baz industrije osrednje regije in vlagajo v nekatera osnovna sredstva, znesek DDV, plačan za ta osnovna sredstva, odbijejo od skupnega zneska DDV, ki se plača.
The legal bases of this programme are Notice on Ministry of Finance and State administration of Taxation issuing the Interim Measures for Expanding the Scope of Offset for Value Added Tax in the Central Region, No. 75, 2007, Notice of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on Several Issues concerning the National Implementation of Value-added Tax reform, No 170 [2008] of the Ministry of Finance.
Pravna podlaga za ta program sta Obvestilo ministrstva za finance in državne davčne uprave št. 75 o začasnih ukrepih za povečanje razpona pobotanja za DDV v osrednji regiji iz leta 2007 in Obvestilo ministrstva za finance in državne davčne uprave št. 170 [2008] o številnih vprašanjih v zvezi z nacionalnim izvajanjem reforme DDV.
The GOC claimed that this programme was terminated by the Notice No 170 [2008] since 1 January 2009 and referred to the replies of the sampled producers for information relating to any benefits that may have been received pursuant to this programme.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da se je ta program zaključil 1. januarja 2009 z Obvestilom št. 170 [2008] in se je v zvezi z informacijami glede kakršnih koli ugodnosti, ki so jih vzorčeni proizvajalci mogoče prejeli na podlagi tega programa, zgolj sklicevala na njihove odgovore.
The Commission notes that the Notice No. 170 does state that VAT benefits for companies located in the Central Region terminate at the end of 2008 and can only be carried forward until January 2009. However, such benefits, being linked to fixed assets, may be allocated over time and continue into the IP;
Komisija je ugotovila, da obvestilo št. 170 v resnici določa, da se ugodnosti glede DDV za družbe iz osrednje regije zaključijo ob koncu leta 2008 in da se lahko prenesejo naprej samo do januarja 2009.
in addition, the Notice also seems to contain another preferential VAT system for these enterprises located in the Central Region as from January 2009 consisting of half of the applicable VAT rates.
Vendar se lahko take ugodnosti, zaradi vezanosti na osnovna sredstva, dodelijo čez daljše obdobje, ki se razteza v OP, poleg tega pa se zdi tudi, da to obvestilo vsebuje nov sistem ugodnejšega DDV za te družbe iz osrednje regije, z začetkom veljavnosti januarja 2009, ki ga sestavlja polovica veljavnih stopenj DDV.
In the absence of clarification by the GOC on the phasing-out of outstanding benefits under this programme or on the details of any replacement programme, the Commission bases its findings on this programme on the evidence available on the file under Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na odsotnost pojasnil kitajske vlade o postopnem odpravljanju neplačanih ugodnosti po tem programu ali o podrobnostih v zvezi s katerim koli nadomestnim programom je Komisija v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe svoje ugotovitve utemeljila na informacijah, ki so na voljo v spisu.
This programme is considered a subsidy in the form of revenue forgone by the GOC within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) and thus conferring a benefit to the recipient companies in the sense of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation equal to the amount of VAT savings generated by the deduction on the purchase of fixed assets.
Ta program se šteje kot subvencija v obliki opuščenega prihodka kitajske vlade v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe, ki je družbam prejemnicam prinesel ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe, ki so enake znesku prihranka DDV zaradi odbitka za nakup osnovnih sredstev.
The programme is specific according to Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation given that the legislation limits access to certain enterprises, i.e. industries that operate in the listed sectors.
Ta program je specifičen v skladu s členom 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe, ker zakonodaja omejuje dostop na nekatere družbe, tj. industrije, ki delujejo na navedenih sektorjih.
This programme is also specific under Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation given that it is limited to certain designated areas, i.e. the cities of the old industrial bases of the Central region.
Ta program je tudi specifičen na podlagi člena 4(3) osnovne uredbe, ker je omejen na nekatera določena območja, tj. mesta v starih bazah industrije osrednje regije.
The benefit conferred on the recipients is considered to be the amount of VAT savings generated by the deduction on the purchase of fixed assets.
Kot ugodnost za prejemnike se šteje znesek prihranka DDV zaradi odbitka za nakup osnovnih sredstev.
In the absence of information for the assessment of this benefit and since a comparable VAT programme has already been examined in this proceeding, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been the assessment made in recitals (297) and (298).
Ob odsotnosti informacij za oceno te ugodnosti in ker je bil primerljiv program glede DDV že preiskan v tem postopku, je bila ocena iz uvodnih izjav (297) in (298) najprimernejši vir informacij, da bi se ocenile ugodnosti za proizvajalce izvoznike.
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies is set at 0,89 %.
Stopnja subvencije, določena na naveden način za vse nesodelujoče družbe, znaša 0,89 %.
The complaint listed miscellaneous tax privileges from 2008 to 2010 enjoyed by OCS producers located in Ma'anshan and Wuhan, including exemptions from city maintenance and construction tax, and extra charges on education funds.
Pritožba navaja različne davčne ugodnosti, ki so jih od leta 2008 do leta 2010 uživali proizvajalci jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, iz Ma‘anshana in Wuhana, vključno z oprostitvijo mestne pristojbine za vzdrževanje in gradnjo ter dodatnih dajatev za sredstva za izobraževanje.
The Commission asked the GOC to provide information on these tax benefits.
Komisija je kitajsko vlado zaprosila, naj predloži informacije o teh davčnih ugodnostih.
The GOC replied that the requested information were irrelevant for the investigation because none of the sampled exporting producers was located in Ma'anshan.
Kitajska vlada je odgovorila, da zahtevane informacije niso pomembne za preiskavo, ker ni nobeden od vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Ma‘anshana.
The Commission refers to its explanation that the GOC was requested to submit information also with regard to the subsidy allegations concerning the non-sampled companies (recitals (34) - (35) above).
Komisija se na tem mestu sklicuje na svoje pojasnilo, da je od kitajske vlade zahtevala predložitev informacij tudi glede domnevnih subvencij v zvezi z nevzorčenimi družbami (uvodni izjavi (34) in (35)).
In the absence of information provided by the GOC, the Commission concludes that the tax privileges available in Ma'anshan and Wuhan are to be considered a subsidy in the form of revenue forgone by the GOC in accordance with Article 3(1)(a)(ii).
Glede na odsotnost informacij, ki bi jih predložila kitajska vlada, je Komisija sklenila, da je treba davčne ugodnosti, ki so bile na voljo v Ma‘anshanu in Wuhanu, šteti kot subvencijo v obliki opuščenega prihodka kitajske vlade v skladu s členom 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
They confer a benefit to the recipient companies in the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation in that they provide a tax saving equal to the difference between the tax paid and the amount of tax normally payable in the absence of this programme.
Te ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe koristijo družbam prejemnicam glede na to, da zagotavljajo davčni prihranek, ki je enak razliki med plačanim davkom in zneskom davka, ki bi se plačal, če tega programa ne bi bilo.
The programme is specific within the meaning of Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation given that it is limited to the enterprises established in certain designated regions or municipalities in Ma'anshan.
Ta program je specifičen v smislu člena 4(3) osnovne uredbe, saj je omejen na družbe s sedežem na nekaterih določenih geografskih območjih ali občinah v Ma‘anshanu.
In the absence of other information for the assessment of this benefit the Commission based its findings on information contained in the complaint.
Ob odsotnosti drugih informacij je Komisija, da bi ocenila to ugodnost, svoje ugotovitve utemeljila na informacijah iz pritožbe.
The subsidy rate thus established for all non-cooperating companies amounts to 0,08 %.
Stopnja subvencije, določena na naveden način za vse nesodelujoče družbe, znaša 0,08 %.
GRANT PROGRAMMES
PROGRAMI NEPOVRATNIH SREDSTEV
The complaint alleged that as from the year 2005 until recently (including the year 2009) the companies producing the product concerned received benefits under several grant programmes and sub-programmes.
Trditev iz pritožbe je bila, da so družbe, ki so proizvajale zadevni izdelek, od leta 2005 do pred kratkim (vključno z letom 2009) prejemale ugodnosti na podlagi številnih programov in podprogramov nepovratnih sredstev. Komisija ni mogla ovreči možnosti, da se plačila po tem programu še opravljajo ali so bila opravljena v enkratnem znesku v povezavi z naložbami v osnovna sredstva;
It cannot be ruled out that payments under this programme either are still on-going or have been effected on a non-recurring basis in connection with capital investment and thus there are still on-going benefits not fully amortised during the chosen 15-year amortisation period.
v tem primeru gre še vedno za ugodnosti, ki niso bile popolnoma amortizirane v izbrani 15-letni amortizacijski dobi.
The GOC was requested to submit information on these programmes but has failed to provide a meaningful reply on any of these programmes.
Komisija je od kitajske vlade zahtevala, da predloži informacije o teh programih, vendar ta o katerem koli od teh programov ni predložila nobenega smiselnega odgovora.
Therefore, in the absence of replies by the GOC on all these aspects, the Commission is basing its findings on the best evidence available in compliance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation
Glede na odsotnost odgovorov, ki bi jih o vseh teh vidikih predložila kitajska vlada, je Komisija svoje ugotovitve v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe utemeljila na najboljših razpoložljivih dokazih.
The legal bases of this programme as reported in the complaint are the following:
Pravna podlaga za ta program, kot je navedeno v pritožbi, so naslednji predpisi:
Circular on Carrying out Evaluation of Products to be Recognised as China World Top Brand, GZJH [2005] No 95
Okrožnica o izvajanju vrednotenja izdelkov, ki se priznajo kot najboljša kitajska znamka na svetu, GZJH [2005] št. 95;
Announcement No 5, 2005 of China Promotion Committee for Top Brand Strategy, Promulgating the List of China Top Brand Products
Obvestilo št. 5 komiteja Kitajske za spodbujanje strategije najboljše znamke o objavi seznama izdelkov najboljših kitajskih znamk iz leta 2005;
Circular on application of China World Top Brands in 2006, ZJZH [2006] No 11;
Okrožnica o izvajanju programa najboljše kitajske znamke na svetu za leto 2006, ZJZH [2006] št. 11;
Announcement No 6, 2006 of China Promotion Committee for Top Brand Strategy, Promulgating the List of China Top Brand Products;
Obvestilo št. 6 komiteja Kitajske za spodbujanje strategije najboljše znamke o objavi seznama izdelkov najboljših kitajskih znamk iz leta 2006;
Announcement No 6, 2007 of China Promotion Committee for Top Brand Strategy, Promulgating the List of China Top Brand Products;
Obvestilo št. 6 komiteja Kitajske za spodbujanje strategije najboljše znamke o objavi seznama izdelkov najboljših kitajskih znamk iz leta 2007;
Circular on application of China World Top Brands in 2008, ZJZH [2008] No 23;
Okrožnica o izvajanju programa najboljše kitajske znamke na svetu za leto 2008, ZJZH [2008] št. 23;
Measures for the Administration of Chinese Top-Brand Products issued by the GOC
Ukrepi za upravljanje kitajskih izdelkov najboljših znamk, ki jih je izdala kitajska vlada.
Only producers granted the designation of "China World Top Brand" are entitled to the benefits of this programme.
Do ugodnosti po tem programu so upravičeni samo proizvajalci z dodeljeno oznako „najboljša kitajska znamka na svetu“.
The complaint reports a number of steel products produced by the steel companies subject to this investigation as being granted this designation.
Pritožba navaja, da je bila ta oznaka dodeljena številnim jeklenim izdelkom, ki jih proizvajajo jeklarske družbe, ki so predmet te preiskave.
Given the lack of cooperation of the GOC, the findings are based on the information present on the file in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na pomanjkljivo sodelovanje kitajske vlade ugotovitve v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe temeljijo na informacijah iz spisa.
This programme provides financial contributions in the form of grants, below-market loans and other incentives, which constitute a direct transfer of funds conferring a benefit upon the recipients within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) and Article 3(2) of the basic regulation.
Ta program zagotavlja finančni prispevek v obliki nepovratnih sredstev, posojil pod pogoji, ugodnejšimi od tržnih, in drugih spodbud, ki se štejejo kot neposreden prenos sredstev, ki prejemnicam prinaša ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(i) in (2) osnovne uredbe.
This subsidy is specific within the meaning of Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation because the legislation limits access to certain enterprises only, that is the enterprises that have received the designation "China World Top Brand" for their products.
Ta subvencija je specifična v smislu člena 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe, saj zakonodaja dostop do nje omejuje na samo nekatere družbe, tj. družbe, ki so za svoje izdelke prejele oznako „najboljša kitajska znamka na svetu“.
Furthermore, there are no objective criteria established by the granting authority with regard to the eligibility of the scheme, which is not automatic under Article 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega ni objektivnih meril za upravičenost do te sheme, ki bi jih oblikoval organ, ki odloča o dodelitvi, in upravičenost se ne dodeljuje samodejno na podlagi člena 4(2)(b) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of precise quantification elsewhere, the most appropriate source of information for the assessment of the benefit to the exporting producers has been comparable decisions by the US authorities.
Ob odsotnosti točne opredelitve kjer koli drugje so bili primerljivi sklepi organov ZDA najustreznejši vir za informacije, da bi se ocenile ugodnosti za proizvajalce izvoznike.
As mentioned before, when basing subsidy amounts on findings in other investigations, account is taken throughout this regulation of, inter alia, whether there have been any significant changes in the scheme in question and whether the subsidy amount may have diminished over time.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, kadar zneski subvencij temeljijo na ugotovitvah iz drugih preiskav, ta uredba med drugim vedno upošteva, ali je bila zadevna shema kakor koli znatno spremenjena in ali se je znesek subvencije sčasoma zmanjšal.