natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to allow the two exporting producers in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (MET) or individual treatment (IT), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms for this purpose.
Da bi proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK lahko predložila zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želita, jima je Komisija poslala obrazca za zahtevek.
Claims for MET, or for IT in case the investigation established that they do not meet the conditions for MET, were received from both of them.
Zahtevka za TGO ali IO, če bi preiskava pokazala, da niso izpolnjeni pogoji za TGO, sta predložila oba.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of dumping and carried out verifications at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za določitev dampinga, in izvedla preveritve v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Exporting producers in the PRC:
proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK
Exporting producers in the analogue country:
proizvajalci izvozniki v primerljivi državi
The product concerned by this review is the same as the one in the original investigation, namely tartaric acid, excluding D-(-)- tartaric acid with a negative optical rotation of at least 12,0 degrees, measured in a water solution according to the method described in the European Pharmacopoeia, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN code ex29181200 (‘the product concerned’).
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta pregled, je enak kot v prvotni preiskavi, tj. vinska kislina, razen vinske kisline D-(-)- z negativno optično rotacijo najmanj 12,0 stopinj, ki se meri v raztopini vode v skladu z metodo, opisano v evropski farmakopeji, s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex29181200 („zadevni izdelek“).
The product concerned is used in wine, in beverage and food additives, as a retardant in plaster and in numerous other products.
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja v vinu, pijačah in aditivih za živila, kot zaviralno sredstvo v mavcu in številnih drugih proizvodih.
It can be obtained either from the by-products of winemaking, as is the case with production in the Union or via chemical synthesis from petrochemical compounds, as is the case with production in the PRC.
Pridobiva se lahko iz stranskih produktov pri proizvodnji vina, kot velja za vse proizvajalce Unije, ali s kemijsko sintezo iz petrokemičnih spojin, kot velja za proizvodnjo v LRK.
Only L+ tartaric acid is manufactured from the by-products of winemaking.
Samo vinska kislina L+ se pridobiva iz stranskih produktov pri proizvodnji vina.
Synthetic production allows the manufacture of both L+ and DL tartaric acid.
Sintetična proizvodnja omogoča pridobivanje vinske kisline L+ in DL.
Both types are product concerned and have overlapping uses.
Obe vrsti sta zadevni izdelek in njuna uporaba se prekriva.
As in the previous investigation, it was considered that the tartaric acid produced in the PRC and exported to the Union, the tartaric acid produced and sold on the domestic market of the analogue country (Argentina) and the tartaric acid manufactured and sold in the Union by the Union producers have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics, and the same basic uses.
Kot v prejšnji preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo vinska kislina, izdelana v LRK in izvažana v Unijo, vinska kislina, izdelana in prodajana na domačem trgu primerljive države (Argentine), ter vinska kislina, izdelana in prodajana v Unijo s strani proizvajalcev Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
Both companies named in the request for review claimed market economy treatment.
Obe družbi, navedeni v zahtevku za pregled, sta zahtevali tržnogospodarsko obravnavo.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value is to be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of that Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
accounting records are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and applied for all purposes;
računovodska dokumentacija je neodvisno revidirana v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporablja za vse namene;
currency exchanges are carried out at the market rate.
menjava valut se opravlja po tržnih stopnjah.
Both producers in the PRC requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Oba proizvajalca iz LRK sta zahtevala TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Each MET application was analysed, and on-the-spot investigations were carried out at the premises of these cooperating companies.
Vsak zahtevek za TGO je bil preučen in v prostorih teh sodelujočih družb so bile opravljene preiskave na kraju samem.
For both companies, MET was denied under Criterion 1 of Article 2(7)(c) based on evidence that the price of the basic raw material, benzene, was distorted.
V skladu z merilom 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) ni bila TGO odobrena nobeni od obeh družb zaradi dokazov, da je cena osnovne surovine benzena izkrivljena.
A comparison of domestic prices in the PRC, using the purchase prices of one cooperating producer as a source, against prices in other market economy countries showed a price difference of between 19 % and 51 % during the investigation period.
Primerjava domačih cen v LRK, pri čemer so kot vir služile nakupne cene sodelujočega proizvajalca, s cenami v drugih državah s tržnim gospodarstvom je v obdobju preiskave pokazala razliko v ceni med 19 % in 51 %.
The PRC imposes an import tariff on benzene of 40 % (although this was not in fact in force during the RIP) and also does not refund any of the 17 % VAT levied on its export.
LRK določa uvozno tarifo na benzen v višini 40 % (čeprav ta med OPP dejansko ni bila v veljavi), prav tako pa ne povrne 17 % DDV na njegov izvoz.
Distortions were also found in the price of the intermediate raw material, maleic anhydride, purchased by the other cooperating producer using its purchases as a source.
Izkrivljanja so bila ugotovljena tudi v ceni vmesne surovine, anhidrid maleinske kisline, ki jo nabavlja drugi sodelujoči proizvajalec, pri čemer so bili kot vir uporabljeni podatki o nabavi tega proizvajalca.
MET was also denied to one company under Criteria 2 and 3 due to evidence of depressed land use right prices and also overvaluation of the company’s assets for the purpose of guaranteeing a loan from a State-owned bank.
TGO prav tako ni bila odobrena eni od družb na podlagi meril 2 in 3 zaradi dokazov o znižanih cenah pravic do uporabe zemljišča in precenitve sredstev družbe za zagotovitev posojila pri državni banki.
Both companies disputed the findings of the Commission after they were disclosed to them.
Obe družbi sta izpodbijali ugotovitve Komisije po tem, ko so jima bile razkrite.
However neither company could explain the low price of benzene on the PRC market.
Vendar pa nobena od njiju ni znala pojasniti nizkih cen benzena na trgu LRK.
The company referred to in recital 19 provided some documents to dispute the Commission’s findings regarding the land use right prices and the valuation of their assets.
Družba iz uvodne izjave (19) je predložila nekatere dokumente, da bi izpodbijala naše ugotovitve v zvezi s cenami pravic do uporabe zemljišča in oceno njihovih sredstev.
However as these documents were requested during the inspection and were not provided, it was therefore decided that this information could not be verified or relied upon.
Ker so bili navedeni dokumenti zahtevani v času pregleda in niso bili predloženi, je bilo sklenjeno, da teh informacij ni bilo mogoče preveriti ali se zanesti nanje.
MET is therefore denied to both companies.
Zato se TGO obema družbama zavrne.
However both companies meet the requirements set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation and are therefore entitled to an individual anti-dumping duty using their own export prices.
Vseeno pa obe družbi izpolnjujeta zahteve iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe in sta zato upravičeni do individualne protidampinške dajatve z uporabo svojih izvoznih cen.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value was determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in an appropriate market economy third country (‘the analogue country’), or the price from the analogue country to other countries, including the Union, or, where those are not possible, on any other reasonable basis, including the price actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product, duly adjusted if necessary to include a reasonable profit margin.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti, pridobljene v ustrezni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“), ali cene, ki velja pri izvozu iz primerljive države v druge države, vključno z Unijo, ali, kadar to ni mogoče, na kateri koli drugi razumni podlagi, vključno s ceno, ki se je dejansko plačala ali se plačuje v Uniji za podoben izdelek in je po potrebi ustrezno prilagojena, da vključuje razumno stopnjo dobička.
Following the publication of the notice of initiation, one company in India and one company in Australia were identified as alternative possible producers in a market economy third country.
Po objavi obvestila o začetku sta bili kot drugi možni proizvajalki v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom določeni družba v Indiji in družba v Avstraliji.
However neither of the two companies responded to the questionnaire sent to them.
Vendar pa ni nobena od družb izpolnila vprašalnika, ki jima je bil poslan.
One producer of tartaric acid in Argentina cooperated with the investigation by replying to a questionnaire.
Pri preiskavi je z izpolnitvijo vprašalnika sodeloval en proizvajalec vinske kisline v Argentini.
The investigation showed that Argentina had a competitive market for tartaric acid with two competing local producers and imports from third countries.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bil argentinski trg vinske kisline zaradi obstoja dveh konkurenčnih lokalnih proizvajalcev in uvoza iz tretjih držav konkurenčen.
The production volume in Argentina constitutes more than 20 % of the volume of PRC exports of the product concerned to the Union.
Obseg proizvodnje v Argentini zajema več kot 20 % obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka LRK v Unijo.
The Argentinian market was therefore deemed sufficiently representative for the determination of normal value for the PRC.
Argentinski trg se je tako štel za dovolj reprezentativnega za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK.
It is therefore concluded, as in the previous investigation, that Argentina constitutes an appropriate analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Kot v prejšnji preiskavi je bilo tako ugotovljeno, da Argentina predstavlja ustrezno primerljivo državo v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value was established on the basis of the information received from the cooperating producer in the analogue country.
Normalna vrednost je bila določena na podlagi informacij, ki jih je poslal sodelujoči proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
Although the analogue country producer had domestic sales of the product concerned, given the difference in the production method between Argentina and the PRC which has a significant impact on prices and costs, it was decided to construct normal value, rather than use these domestic sales prices.
Čeprav je proizvajalec v primerljivi državi zadevni izdelek prodajal na domačem trgu, se je zaradi razlike v načinu proizvodnje med Argentino in LRK, ki znatno vpliva na cene in stroške, sklenilo, da se konstruira normalna vrednost in se domače prodajne cene ne uporabijo.
The cost of raw materials in Argentina was replaced by an average market price for benzene and an adjustment made to selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) in Argentina to better reflect the domestic market in the PRC.
Stroški surovin v Argentini so se nadomestili s povprečno tržno ceno za benzen, poleg tega se je v Argentini izvedla prilagoditev prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov, da bi ti bolje odražali domači trg v LRK.
Normal value for L+ tartaric acid (which is manufactured by the Argentinian producer) was therefore constructed from the cost of production in Argentina of L+ tartaric acid, taking into account the difference in production methods between Argentina and the PRC.
Normalna vrednost za L+ vinsko kislino (ki jo proizvaja argentinski proizvajalec) je bila zato konstruirana na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje L+ vinske kisline v Argentini ter ob upoštevanju razlike v proizvodnih metodah med Argentino in LRK.
Given that the Argentinian producer did not manufacture DL tartaric acid, a normal value was also constructed using the difference in price found between the two product types.
Ker argentinski proizvajalec ni proizvajal DL vinske kisline, je bila tudi v tem primeru normalna vrednost konstruirana s pomočjo razlike v ceni med dvema vrstama izdelka.
Export prices were determined based on the actual price paid or payable by the first independent customer in the Union for both PRC exporting producers.
Izvozne cene so bile določene na podlagi dejanskih cen, plačanih ali plačljivih s strani prvega neodvisnega kupca v Uniji, za oba proizvajalca izvoznika LRK.
For the purposes of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made with regard to certain differences in transport, insurance and indirect taxation, where these were proven to affect prices and price comparability.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe so se pri nekaterih razlikah pri transportu, zavarovanju in posredni obdavčitvi, za katere se je izkazalo, da vplivajo na ceno in primerljivost cen, izvedle ustrezne prilagoditve.
For both companies the weighted average normal value for each product was compared with the weighted average export price for the same product type, as provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Za obe družbi se je tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost za vsak izdelek primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno za isto vrsto izdelka, kot je določeno v členu 2(11) osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, the weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the cif Union frontier price duty unpaid are:
Na podlagi tega so tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
The request for review alleged that the two PRC exporting producers should no longer be granted MET and that this change was of a lasting nature.
Zahtevek za pregled trdi, da dvema proizvajalcema izvoznikoma LRK ne bi več smela biti odobrena TGO in da je bila ta sprememba trajne narave.
Given the reasons for denial of MET it can be considered that the conclusions of this review are of a lasting nature.
Zaradi razlogov za zavrnitev TGO se lahko šteje, da so ugotovitve tega pregleda trajne narave.
Evidence shows that the distortion in the price of benzene in the PRC was in existence prior to the RIP and there is no evidence to show that the PRC government has, or will, remove such distortions.
Dokazi kažejo, da je izkrivljanje cen benzena v LRK obstajalo že pred OPP, in ni dokazov, da je vlada LRK takšna izkrivljanja odpravila ali jih bo odpravila v prihodnosti.
For the company-specific reasons set out in recital 19 these are also of a lasting nature, as they affect the company’s costs and decisions over a significant period of time.
Zaradi specifičnih razlogov za družbo, določenih v uvodni izjavi (19), so ta poleg tega trajne narave, saj bodo v daljšem časovnem obdobju vplivala na stroške in odločitve podjetja.
They were not events that would have affected the original investigation in which MET was granted to this company.
To niso bili primeri, ki bi lahko vplivali na prvotno preiskavo, v kateri je bila tej družbi odobrena TGO.
D. AMENDMENT OF THE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES IN FORCE
D. SPREMEMBA VELJAVNIH PROTIDAMPINŠKIH UKREPOV
In light of the above, it is considered that the present anti-dumping review should amend the level of the existing measures in force on imports of tartaric acid from the PRC.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se šteje, da bi moral sedanji protidampinški pregled spremeniti raven veljavnih ukrepov za uvoz vinske kisline iz LRK.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend that the existing measures be amended.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti sprememba obstoječih ukrepov.
One PRC company replied to the disclosure again disputing the findings regarding the denial of MET on the grounds of price distortion of the main raw material.
Ena družba LRK se je znova odzvala na razkritje z izpodbijanjem ugotovitev v zvezi z zavrnitvijo TGO na podlagi izkrivljanja cene osnovne surovine.
However, it provided no new evidence to support its assertions and its arguments were therefore rejected.
Vendar pa ni predložila novih dokazov, ki bi podprli njene trditve, zato so bili njeni argumenti zavrnjeni.
It also requested further information on the adjustments referred to in recital 27, but this had to be rejected as it would be impossible to do so without disclosing the production methods and costs of the sole producer in Argentina.
Poleg tega je zahtevala nadaljnje informacije o prilagoditvah iz uvodne izjave (27), vendar je bil njen zahtevek zavrnjen, saj tega ne bi bilo mogoče storiti brez razkritja proizvodnih metod in stroškov edinega proizvajalca v Argentini.
The Union industry responded to the disclosure by contesting the use of a constructed normal value rather than domestic sales prices in the analogue country, and also the adjustments referred to above to the constructed normal value to take account of the difference in raw materials and production processes between Argentina and the PRC.
Industrija Unije se je odzvala na razkritje z izpodbijanjem uporabe konstruirane normalne vrednosti namesto domačih prodajnih cen v primerljivi državi in zgoraj omenjenih prilagoditev konstruirani normalni vrednosti, da bi se upoštevale razlike v surovinah in proizvodnih postopkih med Argentino in LRK.
As regards the use of a constructed normal value rather than prices from Argentina, this cannot be considered a change of methodology under Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation.
Uporaba konstruirane normalne vrednosti namesto cen v Argentini ne more predstavljati spremembe v metodologiji iz člena 11(9) osnovne uredbe.
In the original investigation both PRC companies were granted MET and therefore normal value was taken from their own domestic prices.
V prvotni preiskavi je bila TGO odobrena obema družbama iz LRK, zato je bila normalna vrednost izračunana na podlagi njunih domačih cen.
Now that MET has been denied to both companies, the same methodology could no longer be used.
Ker je bila zdaj TGO obema družbama zavrnjena, ni več mogoče uporabiti navedene metodologije.
The Union industry further claimed that the Commission should have used the methodology set out in the original investigation to calculate the residual duty for the PRC to calculate the individual margins for the two exporters concerned by this review.
Industrija Unije je nadalje trdila, da bi morala Komisija za izračun preostale dajatve za LRK, na podlagi katere bi izračunala individualni stopnji za oba izvoznika, na katera se nanaša ta pregled, uporabiti metodologijo, določeno v prvotni preiskavi.
This argument was rejected as the residual duty was calculated for companies that did not cooperate with the original investigation.
Ta argument je bil ovržen, saj je bila preostala dajatev izračunana za družbe, ki niso sodelovale v prvotni preiskavi.
It is therefore not comparable to calculating an individual duty for a cooperating exporter that has been denied MET.
Tega zato ni mogoče primerjati z izračunom individualne dajatve za sodelujočega izvoznika, ki mu je bila zavrnjena TGO.
As regards the adjustments made to the normal value referred to above, these were necessary to ensure a fair comparison between the export price of a synthetically produced tartaric acid, and a normal value based on a natural production process.
Prilagoditve zgoraj omenjene normalne vrednosti so bile potrebne za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med izvozno ceno sintetično proizvedene vinske kisline in normalno vrednostjo na podlagi naravnega proizvodnega postopka.
Attempting the same calculation using domestic sales prices in Argentina and then adjusting the normal value and/or export price under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation would not have provided for a fair comparison.
Vpeljava enakega izračuna z uporabo domačih prodajnih cen v Argentini in prilagoditev normalni vrednosti in/ali izvozni ceni v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe tako ne bi predstavljali poštene primerjave.
These arguments were therefore rejected.
Ti argumenti so bili zato zavrnjeni.
E. UNDERTAKINGS
E. ZAVEZE
One exporting producer in the PRC offered a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Eden od proizvajalcev uvoznikov v LRK je ponudil cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned is not suitable for a fixed price undertaking due to the volatility of the export price.
Zadevni izdelek zaradi spremenljivosti izvozne cene ni primeren za fiksno cenovno zavezo.
In order to overcome this problem, the exporting producer offered an indexation clause, but without specifying how this indexation would be calculated.
Za razrešitev te težave je proizvajalec izvoznik ponudil indeksacijsko klavzulo, vendar pri tem ni opredelil, kako bi bila ta indeksacija izračunana.
It also offered an indexation based on the distorted domestic benzene price in the PRC, which could not be accepted.
Poleg tega je ponudil, da bi indeksacija temeljila na izkrivljenih domačih cenah benzena v LRK, kar je bilo nesprejemljivo.
Moreover, that exporting producer produces different types of other chemical products and may sell these products to common customers in the European Union via related trading companies.
Poleg tega ta proizvajalec izvoznik proizvaja različne vrste drugih kemičnih proizvodov, ki bi jih lahko prodajal skupnim strankam v Evropski uniji prek povezanih trgovinskih družb.
This would create a serious risk of cross-compensation and would make effective monitoring extremely difficult.
To bi pomenilo resno tveganje za navzkrižno kompenzacijo in bi močno otežilo učinkovito spremljanje.
Furthermore, there are different types of the product concerned which are not easily distinguishable and have a considerable difference in price.
Poleg tega obstajajo različne vrste zadevnega izdelka, ki jih je težko medsebojno razlikovati in katerih cene se znatno razlikujejo.
The different MIPs proposed by the exporting producer would therefore render monitoring impracticable.
Zaradi razlike pri minimalnih uvoznih cenah, ki jih predlaga proizvajalec izvoznik, spremljanje ne bi bilo izvedljivo.
On the basis of the above, it was concluded that the undertaking offers cannot be accepted,
Na podlagi navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da ponudb za zaveze ni mogoče sprejeti –
The Table in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 349/2012 shall be amended to read as follows:
Preglednica iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 349/2012 se ustrezno spremeni:
All other companies (except Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd, Hangzhou — TARIC additional code A687)
Vse druge družbe (razen družbe Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd, Hangzhou – dodatna oznaka TARIC A687).
OJ L 110, 24.4.2012, p. 3.
UL L 110, 24.4.2012, str. 3.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 627/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 627/2012