natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the original investigation the Commission already made an adjustment to the normal value to take into account quality control steps applied by the Indian producer which were not found for Chinese sampled producers.
Komisija je v prvotni preiskavi že prilagodila normalno vrednost, da so se upoštevali koraki nadzora kakovosti, ki jih je uporabil indijski proizvajalec, ki pa jih ni bilo pri kitajskih vzorčenih proizvajalcih.
Under these circumstances, the Commission does not consider it necessary to resort to another normal value data set as suggested by the parties concerned.
Komisiji se glede na te okoliščine ne zdi potrebno, da uporabi drug podatkovni niz za normalno vrednost, kot so to predlagale zadevne strani.
Finally, as mentioned in recital 89 of the definitive Regulation despite the efforts of the Commission no other producers from any possible analogue country offered to cooperate in the proceeding.
Nazadnje, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 89 dokončne uredbe, se kljub prizadevanjem Komisije za sodelovanje v postopku ni javil noben drug proizvajalec iz katere koli primerljive države.
Regarding the use of the data of the Indian analogue country producer for the determination of the normal value, the Association of European Distributors (EFDA) claimed that such technique was not appropriate given that its product range, production volume, customer profile, distribution method and market position were not comparable to the situation of the Chinese exporting producers.
Glede uporabe podatkov indijskega proizvajalca iz primerljive države za določitev normalne vrednosti je Zveza evropskih distributerjev (EFDA) trdila, da taka tehnika ni bila primerna glede na to, da nabor izdelkov, količina proizvodnje, profil stranke, način distribucije in položaj na trgu tega proizvajalca niso bili primerljivi s položajem kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
In addition, it claimed that the Chinese prices were low because they reflected the benefits of high-volume production of standard products since they are specialised and efficient producers.
Poleg tega je trdila, da so bile kitajske cene nizke, ker so izražale prednosti proizvodnje velikih količin standardnih izdelkov, saj gre za specializirane in učinkovite proizvajalce.
Moreover, it requested more detailed information regarding the Indian producer’s prices and production volume of standard fasteners.
Zahtevala je tudi podrobnejše informacije glede cen in obsega proizvodnje standardnih pritrdilnih elementov indijskega proizvajalca.
Finally, EFDA submitted Eurostat data to support their allegations that a comparison regarding export prices from the PRC and India for two specific CN codes would show that the Indian exports of these products were less than 4 % of the PRC exports and that India was not a credible supplier of these products for export markets.
Končno je EFDA predložila Eurostatove podatke v podporo svojim trditvam, da bi primerjava izvoznih cen iz LRK in Indije za dve specifični oznaki KN pokazala, da je indijski izvoz teh izdelkov znašal manj kot 4 % izvoza LRK in da Indija ni bila zaupanja vreden dobavitelj teh izdelkov za izvozne trge.
As regards the appropriateness of the choice of the Indian analogue country producer, reference is made to the last part of recital 49 above.
Primernost izbire indijskega proizvajalca iz primerljive države je bila obravnavana v zadnjem delu uvodne izjave 49 zgoraj.
In relation to the general claim that Chinese export prices reflected the benefits of high-volume production, these claims were not substantiated or quantified in a meaningful manner that could assist in the analysis being carried out at that stage of the review.
V zvezi s splošno trditvijo, da so kitajske izvozne cene izražale prednosti proizvodnje velikih količin, teh trditev ni mogoče utemeljiti ali količinsko opredeliti na način, ki bi lahko pomagal pri analizi, ki je bila opravljena na tisti stopnji pregleda.
As regards the request for additional information regarding the Indian producer’s data, reference is made to recital 82 regarding confidentiality.
Zahteve po dodatnih informacijah v zvezi s podatki indijskega proizvajalca so bile obravnavane v uvodni izjavi 82 glede zaupnosti.
With regard to the claim that the exports from India were not comparable to those from the PRC during the IP and after the IP, for the determination of the normal value, it is the Indian domestic prices which are considered to be relevant according to the basic Regulation and not the Indian export prices.
Glede na trditev, da izvoz iz Indije med in po OP ni bil primerljiv z izvozom iz LRK, se v skladu z osnovno uredbo za določitev normalne vrednosti kot pomembne štejejo indijske domače cene in ne indijske izvozne cene.
Therefore, these claims from EFDA were unfounded.
Zato te trditve EFDA niso utemeljene.
Regarding the issue of the coating applied by the Indian producer, the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and a Chinese exporting producer expressed doubts and requested the Commission to explain how the confidential information offered is conclusive proof that the Indian producer only sold electro-plated fasteners on its domestic market.
Glede vprašanja premaza, ki jo je uporabil indijski proizvajalec, sta Kitajska trgovinska zbornica in kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik izrazila dvom in od Komisije zahtevala, naj pojasni, kako so zaupne informacije zadosten dokaz, da je Indijski proizvajalec na svojem domačem trgu prodajal samo galvanizirane pritrdilne elemente.
During the verification, the Indian producer provided evidence that allowed the Commission to conclude that standard fasteners sold domestically were electroplated, corresponding to the coating type ‘A’ of the original PCN.
Indijski proizvajalec je med preveritvenim obiskom zagotovil dokaz, na podlagi katerega je Komisija lahko zaključila, da so bili standardni pritrdilni elementi, prodani na domačem trgu, galvanizirani, kar ustreza vrsti premaza „A“ v prvotni kontrolni številki izdelka.
In these circumstances, the Commission considers that the evidence in the file is sufficient to conclude that standard fasteners sold on the domestic market were electroplated.
Komisija meni, da je v teh okoliščinah dokaz v spisu zadosten, da je mogoče zaključiti, da so bili standardni pritrdilni elementi, prodani na domačem trgu, galvanizirani.
In this respect, an adjustment was made for difference in chrome, as mentioned in recital 81 below.
V zvezi s tem je bila opravljena prilagoditev za razliko v kromu, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 81 spodaj.
Further information requested after the information disclosure note of 5 July 2012
Dodatne informacije, ki so bile zahtevane po obvestilu o razkritju informacij z dne 5. julija 2012
Some exporting producers requested further clarifications and information in order to be able to make a possible request for adjustments to their own dumping margin as established in the original investigation, based on the following considerations:
Nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so zahtevali dodatna pojasnila in informacije, s pomočjo katerih bi lahko vložili morebitno zahtevo za prilagoditev svoje stopnje dampinga, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi, in sicer na podlagi naslednjih dejavnikov:
characteristics of the ‘product types’ used (CN codes, strength class, standard vs special parts) for the determination of the normal value;
značilnosti uporabljenih „vrst izdelkov“ (oznake KN, trdnostni razred, standardni/posebni deli) za določitev normalne vrednosti;
further information regarding characteristics of the products sold by the Indian producer used for the determination of the normal value;
dodatne informacije glede značilnosti izdelkov, ki jih je prodajal indijski proizvajalec in ki so se uporabile za določitev normalne vrednosti;
clarification regarding the reasons why the remaining characteristics of the original PCN were not used; and
pojasnilo glede vzrokov, zakaj se niso uporabile preostale značilnosti prvotne kontrolne številke izdelka, ter
adjustments to be made for difference in physical characteristics.
prilagoditve, uporabljene za razliko med fizikalnimi značilnostmi.
Regarding point (a) above, as mentioned in the information note provided on 30 May 2012, the strength class of the fasteners sold by the Indian cooperating producer was the indicator of strength contained in the PCN used in the questionnaire sent to all parties.
Glede točke (a) zgoraj, kot je omenjeno v informativnem obvestilu z dne 30. maja 2012, je bil trdnostni razred pritrdilnih elementov, ki jih je prodajal indijski sodelujoči proizvajalec, kazalec trdnosti, vsebovane v kontrolni številki izdelka, ki je bila uporabljena v vprašalniku, poslanem vsem stranem.
The strength class was identified by using the same relevant element of the PCN by the Indian producer on the sales listings verified during the on-spot verification visit.
Trdnostni razred je bil določen z uporabo istega pomembnega elementa kontrolne številke izdelka indijskega proizvajalca na seznamih prodaj, ki so bili preverjeni na kraju samem med preveritvenim obiskom.
The distinction between special and standard fasteners was explained in recital 54 of the definitive Regulation.
Razlika med posebnimi in standardnimi pritrdilnimi elementi je bila pojasnjena v uvodni izjavi 54 dokončne uredbe.
‘Special’ fasteners are those manufactured to a customer drawing.
„Posebni“ pritrdilni elementi so izdelani na podlagi načrta stranke.
‘Standard’ fasteners are those manufactured for stock and not to the specifications of a particular customer.
„Standardni“ pritrdilni elementi so izdelani za zalogo in ne po specifikacijah določene stranke.
The need to differentiate between standard and special fasteners produced by the Indian cooperating producer had been fully recognised and as mentioned in recitals 51 and 54 of the definitive Regulation, the comparison between the export price and the normal value for the sampled Chinese exporting producers was made between fasteners of the ‘standard’ type.
Potreba po razlikovanju med standardnimi in posebnimi pritrdilnimi elementi, ki jih je proizvajal indijski sodelujoči proizvajalec, je bila v celoti priznana, in kot je omenjeno v uvodnih izjavah 51 in 54 dokončne uredbe, je bila narejena primerjava med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo za vzorčene kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike med pritrdilnimi elementi „standardne“ vrste.
With regard to issues raised under point (b), for confidentiality reasons, it is not possible to disclose the exact types of model of screws and bolts sold by the Indian producer.
V zvezi z vprašanji iz točke (b) zaradi zaupnosti ni mogoče razkriti točnih vrst modelov vijakov in sornikov, ki jih je prodajal indijski proizvajalec.
However, as indicated above, the comparison was made on a weight basis within the same category standard or special and within the same strength class set out in the PCN.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, pa je bila primerjava izvedena na podlagi teže znotraj iste kategorije standardnih ali posebnih pritrdilnih elementov in znotraj istega trdnostnega razreda, ki je določen v kontrolni številki izdelka.
Again in regard to issues raised under point (b), several interested parties requested more information on coating.
V zvezi s vprašanji iz točke (b) je več zainteresiranih strani zahtevalo več informacij o premazu.
The original investigation data was further analysed and this showed that the product sold as ‘standard’ on the Indian domestic market had a basic coating, i.e. electroplating.
Podatki prvotne preiskave so bili dodatno analizirani in pokazalo se je, da je imel izdelek, ki je bil na indijskem domačem trgu prodan kot „standarden“, osnovni premaz, tj. galvaniziran premaz.
This information was provided in hearings requested by interested parties and was redisclosed to the interested parties that had requested this information and was also placed in the file for inspection by interested parties.
Te informacije so bile pridobljene na zaslišanjih, ki so jih zahtevale zainteresirane strani, in ponovno razkrite zainteresiranim stranem, ki so te informacije zahtevale, prav tako pa so bile dane v spis, kjer so jih zainteresirane strani lahko preučile.
Two sampled exporting producers requested more information regarding adjustments for the use of chrome in coating.
Dva vzorčena proizvajalca izvoznika sta zahtevala več informacij glede prilagoditev za uporabo kroma v premazu.
The sales data provided by the Indian cooperating producer were further analysed which led to an adjustment in the normal value for difference in chrome as explained in recital 81 below.
Podatki o prodaji, ki jih je predložil indijski sodelujoči proizvajalec, so bili dodatno analizirani, kar je privedlo do prilagoditve normalne vrednosti za razliko v kromu, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 81 spodaj.
The same two exporting producers requested more clarification as to how the profitability was determined for the domestic sales of the Indian cooperating producer; whether the production costs had been reported on a PCN basis or whether average costs had been used; and whether the normal value included sales to any related companies.
Ista proizvajalca izvoznika sta zahtevala dodatno pojasnilo glede načina, s katerim je bila določena dobičkonosnost za domačo prodajo indijskega sodelujočega proizvajalca; bodisi je bilo o stroških proizvodnje poročano na podlagi kontrolne številke izdelka bodisi so bili uporabljeni povprečni stroški; in ali je normalna vrednost vključevala prodajo katerim koli povezanim družbam.
All relevant information regarding the normal value were mentioned in recital 94 of the definitive Regulation.
Vse pomembne informacije glede normalne vrednosti so bile omenjene v uvodni izjavi 94 dokončne uredbe.
It is also specified that only domestic sales to unrelated companies were used.
Navedeno je tudi, da je bila uporabljena samo domača prodaja nepovezanim družbam.
These two exporting producers later argued that they had serious doubts about whether the profitability and the representativity tests were carried out in a correct way.
Ta proizvajalca izvoznika sta pozneje trdila, da sta resno dvomila, ali sta bila preizkusa dobičkonosnosti in reprezentativnosti izvedena pravilno.
More specifically with regard to the representativity test, these exporting producers doubted that the quantities of the domestic sales of the Indian producer were above 5 % of their export sales per the revised product groups.
Proizvajalca izvoznika sta v zvezi s preizkusom reprezentativnosti dvomila, da je količina domače prodaje indijskega proizvajalca znašala več kot 5 % njune izvozne prodaje na revidirane skupine izdelkov.
In regard to the representativity test it was found that in cases where the 5 % test was not met for a particular product type, domestic sales were nonetheless found to be of sufficient magnitude to provide for a proper comparison.
V zvezi s preizkusom reprezentativnosti je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila v primeru, ko vrednost 5 % v preizkusu ni bila dosežena za posamezno vrsto izdelka, domača prodaja kljub temu dovolj obsežna, da je omogočala ustrezno primerjavo.
With regard to the profitability test, it is confirmed that this was carried out on a product type basis.
V zvezi s preizkusom dobičkonosnosti je potrjeno, da je bil izveden na podlagi vrste izdelka.
With regard to the issues raised under point (c) above, i.e. why the full PCN was not used to compare normal value to export price, it became clear during the investigation that the full PCN would not be a reliable indicator.
Ob upoštevanju vprašanj, izpostavljenih v točki (c) zgoraj, tj. zakaj ni bila uporabljena celotna kontrolna številka izdelka za primerjavo normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene, se je med preiskavo izkazalo, da celotna kontrolna številka izdelka ne bi bila zanesljiv kazalec.
Firstly, because neither the Chinese nor the Indian authorities distinguish between the 10 CN codes used to define the product concerned as do the EU authorities.
Prvič zato, ker ne kitajski ne indijski organi ne razlikujejo med 10 oznakami KN, ki jih za opredelitev zadevnega izdelka uporabljajo na primer organi EU.
Secondly, as explained in recital 48 of the definitive Regulation, a number of parties claimed that fasteners produced by the Chinese exporting producers were standard products (mainly ranging between 4.8 and 8.8 class of resistance), which had no special characteristics regarding raw material, resistance, coating, or certification/safety related aspects; which were destined for lower-end applications (non-professional use and general distribution) as opposed to high-end applications; and did not meet strict requirements of specific end-users such as the automotive, chemical or aerospace industry.
Drugič, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 48 dokončne uredbe, so številne strani trdile, da je večina pritrdilnih elementov, proizvedenih v LRK, standardnih izdelkov (običajno z odpornostjo med razredoma 4.8 in 8.8), ki nimajo posebnih lastnosti v zvezi s surovinami, odpornostjo, premazom ali certifikacijo/varnostjo; namenjenih za končne uporabe na nižji ravni (neprofesionalna uporaba in splošna distribucija) v nasprotju z visokotehničnimi uporabami ter ne izpolnjuje strogih zahtev posebnih končnih uporabnikov, kot so avtomobilska, kemična ali letalska in vesoljska industrija.
With regard to the issues raised under point (d) above, elements of ‘traceability’, ISO standard 9000, unit of defective rate and other criteria such as ‘hardness, bending, strength, impact toughness, friction coefficient’ which were raised by two other exporting producers could not be accepted, as the companies concerned have not shown how these elements affect the price comparability between the normal value and export price.
Ob upoštevanju vprašanj iz točke (d) zgoraj, ni bilo mogoče sprejeti elementov „sledljivosti“, standarda ISO 9000, enote stopnje napake in drugih meril, kot so „trdota, upogibnost, trdnost, udarna trdnost, koeficient trenja“, ki sta jih izpostavila dva druga proizvajalca izvoznika, saj zadevne družbe niso pokazale, kako ti elementi vplivajo na primerljivost cen med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno.
In the absence of any specific information with regard to the lack of comparability as claimed in addition to the recommendations which had been made by the interested parties in the original investigation, and given the limited amount of further information available regarding other technical characteristics such as coating, it was concluded in the original investigation that the main factors and differences highlighted by the interested parties themselves, in particular standard vs special and strength class constituted a sufficient basis on which to base the comparison between the normal value and export prices.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da ni bilo specifičnih informacij v zvezi s pomanjkanjem primerljivosti, kar je bilo izpostavljeno poleg priporočil zainteresiranih strani iz prvotne preiskave, in ob upoštevanju omejene količine nadaljnjih razpoložljivih informacij glede drugih tehničnih lastnosti, kot je premaz, je bilo v prvotni preiskavi ugotovljeno, da glavni dejavniki in razlike, ki so jih poudarile zainteresirane strani same, zlasti razmerje med standardnim in posebnim ter trdnostnim razredom, pomenijo zadostno osnovo za primerjavo normalne vrednosti in izvoznih cen.
Further disclosure of information concerning the normal value on 11 July 2012
Nadaljnje razkritje informacij v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo dne 11. julija 2012
On 11 July 2012 the Commission further disclosed the reclassification of the normal value as described above and its proposed recalculation of the dumping margins on the basis explained above and requested comments.
Komisija je 11. julija 2012 nadalje razkrila ponovno uvrstitev normalne vrednosti, kot je navedeno zgoraj, in svoj predlagani ponovni izračun stopenj dampinga na zgoraj pojasnjeni podlagi ter pozvala k predložitvi pripomb.
As mentioned in recital 32 above, the Indian producer provided in its original submission a domestic sales listing (‘DMSAL’), without PCNs.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 32 zgoraj, je indijski proizvajalec prvotno predložil seznam domače prodaje („DMSAL“) brez kontrolnih številk izdelkov.
The only identifier of each sale was an Item Code, which was an internal code for each product, and a product description text string, for example:
Edina identifikacijska oznaka posamezne prodaje je bila oznaka izdelka, ki je interna oznaka posameznega izdelka, skupaj z besedilnim opisom izdelka, na primer:
As explained in recitals 48 to 57 of the definitive Regulation, the Indian company provided a split of its domestic sales between standard and special fasteners using the distinction mentioned in recital 77.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 48 do 57 dokončne uredbe, je indijsko podjetje razdelilo svojo domačo prodajo na standardne in posebne pritrdilne elemente, pri čemer je uporabilo razlikovanje iz uvodne izjave 77.
As a result the DMSAL was submitted as two files, ‘Standard DMSAL’ and ‘Special DMSAL’.
Posledično je bil seznam domače prodaje „DMSAL“ predložen v dveh spisih, in sicer kot „standardni seznam domače prodaje“ in „posebni seznam domače prodaje“.
Those sales that could not be identified as either Standard or Special were excluded from further calculation of the normal value.
Tista prodaja, ki je ni bilo mogoče opredeliti kot standardno ali posebno, je bila izključena iz nadaljnjega izračuna normalne vrednosti.
During the investigation it also became clear that the strength class of the fastener would be needed to establish the normal value.
Med preiskavo se je tudi izkazalo, da je trdnostni razred pritrdilnih elementov potreben za določitev normalne vrednosti.
The Indian company identified the strength class per line of the ‘Standard DMSAL’ and ‘Special DMSAL’ files and these were submitted with a column labelled ‘Grade’ with the strength class indicated, for example:
Indijsko podjetje je določilo trdnostni razred za posamezne postavke spisov „standardni seznam domače prodaje“ in „posebni seznam domače prodaje“, ki sta bila predložena v stolpcu „stopnja“ z navedenim trdnostnim razredom, na primer:
The original normal value was calculated on this basis, using the split into standard/special and the strength class, as set out in the first disclosure of the implementation review on 30 May 2012.
Prvotna normalna vrednost je bila izračunana na tej podlagi z uporabo delitve na standardno/posebno in na trdnostni razred, kot je opredeljeno v prvem razkritju pregleda izvajanja 30. maja 2012.
As mentioned in recital 54, some exporting producers requested further clarifications making reference to the lack of comparison on the basis of coating, diameter and length of the fastener and argued that this might have an effect on the level of the normal value originally calculated.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 54, so nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki zahtevali nadaljnja pojasnila, pri čemer so se sklicevali na nezadostno primerjavo na podlagi premaza, premera in dolžine pritrdilnega elementa, ter trdili, da utegne to vplivati na stopnjo prvotno izračunane normalne vrednosti.
In the absence of the PCN, the description text string of each transaction (after grouping together transactions with the same description text) was analysed to extract the diameter and length of the fastener sold.
Ker ni bilo kontrolne številke izdelka, je bil besedilni opis posamezne transakcije (po združevanju transakcij z enakim opisom) analiziran za pridobitev premera in dolžine prodanega pritrdilnega elementa.
Taking the example above, M8 = diameter, and 16 = length.
V zgornjem primeru je M8 premer in 16 dolžina.
In this case therefore, this describes a screw with a diameter of 8 mm and a length of 16 mm. The 1,25 refers to the thread pitch, which was not used to classify the product concerned.
V tem primeru je to opis vijaka s premerom 8 mm in dolžino 16 mm. Vrednost 1,25 označuje širino navoja, ki ni bila uporabljena za razvrstitev zadevnega izdelka.
The PCN used by the Chinese exporting producers reports this data slightly differently.
Kontrolna številka izdelka, ki jo uporabljajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, navaja te podatke nekoliko drugače.
The screw above would have reported ‘080016’ for diameter and length.
Pri navedenem vijaku bi bila premer in dolžina označena z „080016“.