natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a result, the normal value was constructed on the basis of the cost of manufacturing to which a reasonable amount for profit and for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) was added, based on facts available.
Normalna vrednost se je zato konstruirala na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov, ki so jim bili dodani razumni zneski za dobiček ter za PSA-stroške, na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov.
The cooperating producer exported the product concerned either directly or via their related trading company in Switzerland to independent customers in the Union.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec je zadevni izdelek izvažal neodvisnim strankam v Uniji neposredno ali prek svoje povezane trgovinske družbe v Švici.
Export prices were therefore, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable by the first independent customer in the Union.
Izvozne cene so bile zato v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določene na podlagi cen, ki jih je prva neodvisna stranka v Uniji dejansko plačala ali jih plačuje.
The comparison between the constructed normal value and the export price was made on an ex-works basis.
Opravljena je bila primerjava med konstruirano normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno na osnovi franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison at the same level of trade due allowance was made for differences that were found to affect price comparability.
Zaradi zagotavljanja poštene primerjave na isti ravni trgovanja so bile narejene ustrezne prilagoditve za razlike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da vplivajo na primerljivost cene.
Adjustments pursuant to Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation were thus made in respect of transport costs, rebates and discounts, commissions and credit costs.
Zato so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe izvedli popravki glede stroškov prevoza, rabatov in popustov, provizij in stroškov kredita.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average of the constructed normal value with the weighted average export price to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne konstruirane normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno v Unijo.
This comparison showed the existence of significant dumping of over 60 % during the RIP.
Ta primerjava je pokazala znaten damping v višini nad 60 % v OPP.
During the RIP, as recorded in Eurostat, the total import volume of SPT from Russia amounted to 10785 tonnes, representing around 1 % of the Union market share.
Po Eurostatovih podatkih je v OPP celoten obseg uvoza brezšivnih cevi iz Rusije znašal 10785 metričnih ton, kar predstavlja okoli 1 % tržnega deleža Unije.
As mentioned above, in the absence of cooperation by exporting producers in Russia, resort had to be made to facts available to determine whether dumping existed in the RIP.
Ker ruski proizvajalci izvozniki torej niso sodelovali, se je bilo treba poslužiti razpoložljivih dejstev za ugotavljanje obstoja dampinga v OPP.
Pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation and in the absence of questionnaire data, normal value was calculated based on data from the review request and the Metal Expert periodical publications for the most basic quality of seamless hot finished tubes.
Ker podatkov iz vprašalnikov ni bilo na voljo, se je v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe osnovna vrednost izračunala na podlagi podatkov iz zahtevka za pregled in periodičnih publikacij Metal Expert za najbolj osnovno kakovost brezšivnih vroče dodelanih cevi.
In regard to gas prices in Russia, it was noted that an adjustment had to be made under Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation when measures were imposed in the latest investigation [16].
Glede na cene plina v Rusiji se je pri uvedbi ukrepov v zadnji preiskavi ugotovilo, da je treba prilagoditev izvesti v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe [16].
However, in the current investigation, the normal value was determined without considering whether an adjustment was necessary for the gas costs borne by Russian exporting producers in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar se je v sedanji preiskavi normalna vrednost določila brez upoštevanja nujnosti prilagoditve zaradi stroškov za plin, ki so jih imeli ruski proizvajalci izvozniki, v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
This was because, as shown in recital 53, the use of an unadjusted cost of production already clearly shows that dumping took place during the RIP.
Kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi 53, uporaba neprilagojenih stroškov proizvodnje namreč že jasno kaže, da je v OPP obstajal damping.
As a consequence, and given the fact that the purpose of an expiry review is to determine whether dumping would be likely to continue or recur should measures be repealed in order to determine whether the currently applicable measures should be maintained or repealed, it was considered that it was not necessary to examine whether an adjustment under Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation was justified in this case.
Zaradi tega in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je namen pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov ugotoviti, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping nadaljeval ali znova pojavil, če bi se ukrepi razveljavili, da bi lahko ugotovili, ali je treba trenutno veljavne ukrepe ohraniti ali razveljaviti, se je menilo, da ni treba proučiti, ali je prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe v tem primeru utemeljena.
Average export price was calculated based on the cif value from Eurostat for the corresponding types of seamless hot finished tubes.
Povprečna izvozna cena je bila izračunana na podlagi vrednosti CIF po podatkih Eurostata za ustrezne vrste brezšivnih vroče dodelanih cevi.
In the absence of verified questionnaire data, the comparison between the normal value and the export price was made using data found in the request in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Ker podatkov iz vprašalnikov ni bilo na voljo, je bila opravljena primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene ter uporabe podatkov iz zahtevka v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 18(5) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the calculated average normal value with the weighted average export price to the Union, by product type.
V skladu s členom 18(5) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave izračunane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno v Unijo za posamezno vrsto izdelka.
This comparison showed the existence of dumping amounting to 38,4 %, which is higher than the dumping margin of 35,8 % found in the latest investigation.
Ta primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga v višini 38,4 %, ki je višji od 35,8-odstotne stopnje dampinga iz zadnje preiskave.
Of three known exporting producers in Ukraine only one group of exporting producers cooperated with the Commission in the current review investigation; the Interpipe group.
Od treh znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Ukrajini je samo ena skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov sodelovala s Komisijo v sedanji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, tj. Interpipe Group.
This exporting producer accounted for approximately 70 % of Ukraine’s total SPT production and more than 80 % of Ukraine’s total exports to the Union.
Ta proizvajalec izvoznik je predstavljal približno 70 % celotne proizvodnje brezšivnih cevi in več kot 80 % celotnega izvoza Ukrajine v Unijo.
During the RIP, the share of Ukraine’s exports to the Union in relation to Union consumption amounted to less than 2 %.
V OPP je delež ukrajinskega izvoza v Unijo glede na potrošnjo Unije znašal manj kot 2 %.
The investigation established that the domestic sales of the like product were representative in accordance with recitals 31 to 33 above.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bila domača prodaja podobnega izdelka reprezentativna v skladu z uvodnimi izjavami 31 do 33.
Therefore, normal value was established in accordance with recitals 34 to 37 as above.
Normalna vrednost se je zato določila v skladu z uvodnimi izjavami 34 do 37.
In regard to energy prices in Ukraine, it was noted that an adjustment had to be made under Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation when measures were imposed in the latest investigation [17].
Glede na cene energije v Ukrajini se je pri uvedbi ukrepov v zadnji preiskavi ugotovilo, da je treba prilagoditev izvesti v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe [17].
However, in the current investigation, the normal value was determined without considering whether an adjustment was necessary for energy costs borne by Ukrainian exporting producers in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar se je v sedanji preiskavi normalna vrednost določila brez upoštevanja nujnosti prilagoditve zaradi stroškov energije, ki so jih imeli ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki, v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
This was because, as shown in recital 61 below, the use of an unadjusted cost of production already clearly shows that dumping took place during the RIP.
Kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi 61, uporaba neprilagojenih stroškov proizvodnje namreč že jasno kaže, da je v OPP obstajal damping.
The Interpipe group exported the product concerned through their related trading company located in Switzerland directly to independent customers in the Union.
Skupina Interpipe je zadevni izdelek izvažala neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji prek svoje povezane trgovinske družbe s sedežem v Švici.
Export prices were therefore established in accordance with recital 38.
Izvozne cene so se zato določile v skladu z uvodno izjavo 38.
The normal value and the export price of the Interpipe group were compared in accordance with recital 39.
Opravljena je bila primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene skupine Interpipe v skladu z uvodno izjavo 39.
On this basis, adjustments for transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, credit costs, and commissions have been made where applicable and justified.
Na podlagi tega so bile izvedene prilagoditve za prevoz, zavarovanje, manipuliranje, natovarjanje in druge tozadevne stroške, stroške kredita ter provizije, kadar je bilo primerno in upravičeno.
The dumping margin was calculated in accordance with recital 40.
Stopnja dampinga je bila izračunana v skladu z uvodno izjavo 40.
As in the last investigation, and in line with the institutions’ standard practice, a single dumping margin was calculated for the whole group.
Kot v zadnji preiskavi in v skladu s standardno prakso institucij je bila za celotno skupino izračunana enotna stopnja dampinga.
In the method used for doing so the amount of dumping was calculated for each individual exporting producer before determining a weighted average rate of dumping for the group as a whole.
Z metodo za izračun je bil obseg dampinga izračunan za vsakega posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika pred določitvijo tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga za skupino kot celoto.
It should be noted that this methodology was different from the methodology applied in the last investigation, where the dumping calculation was done by collapsing all production, profitability and sales in the Union of the producing entities.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila ta metodologija drugačna od metodologije, ki se je uporabila v zadnji preiskavi, ko je bil damping izračunan z združitvijo vse proizvodnje, dobičkonosnosti in prodaje proizvajalcev v Uniji.
The change in circumstances that warrants this change in methodology is due to a change in the corporate structure of the group allowing the identification of the producer within the group in respect to sales and production.
Spremenjene okoliščine, ki upravičujejo to spremembo metodologije, so pogojene s spremembo podjetniške strukture skupine, ki omogoča opredelitev proizvajalca v skupini glede na prodajo in proizvodnjo.
The comparison showed the existence of dumping of more than 10 % for the cooperating group of exporting producers that exported to the Union in the RIP.
Primerjava je pokazala obstoj več kot 10-odstotnega dampinga za sodelujočo skupino proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki je v OPP izvažala v Unijo.
It follows from the above considerations that dumping continued to be present during the review investigation period.
Iz navedenih premislekov sledi, da se je damping nadaljeval v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Therefore, the likelihood of continuation of dumping in case the measures would be allowed to lapse is examined in the following.
Zato je v nadaljevanju obravnavana verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga v primeru izteka ukrepov.
As noted above in recital 46, a significant dumping margin was found to exist during the review investigation period.
Kot navaja uvodna izjava 46, je bila v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ugotovljena znatna stopnja dampinga.
The investigation showed that no significant stocks are held by the company which produced to order.
Preiskava je pokazala, da družba, ki proizvaja po naročilu, nima velikih zalog.
Indeed, due to the wide variety of pipes and high costs, no economical benefits can be realised by holding large stocks.
Zaradi zelo različnih cevi in visokih stroškov velike zaloge ne pomenijo nobene ekonomske koristi.
In view of the above consideration and taking into account that the process of selling the company is still ongoing, a continuation of dumping of SPT originating in Croatia is highly unlikely in the short to medium term.
Zaradi navedenega premisleka in ob upoštevanju, da je prodaja družbe še vedno v teku, je nadaljevanje dampinga brezšivnih cevi s poreklom iz Hrvaške srednjeročno zelo malo verjetno.
Further to the analysis of the existence of dumping during the RIP, the likelihood of continuation of dumping was also investigated.
Po analizi obstoja dampinga v OPP je bila proučena tudi verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga.
In this respect, the following elements were analysed: the volume and prices of dumped imports from Russia, the production capacity and the spare capacity in Russia, the attractiveness of the Union market and other third markets.
V zvezi s tem so bili analizirani naslednji dejavniki: obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza iz Rusije, proizvodna zmogljivost in prosta zmogljivost v Rusiji, privlačnost trga Unije in drugih trgov tretjih držav.
Volume and prices of dumped imports from Russia
Obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza iz Rusije.
After the imposition of definitive measures in June 2006, and their revision in August 2008 by Council Regulation (EC) No 812/2008 [18], imports declared as originating in Russia decreased steadily and remained low until the end of the RIP.
Po uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov junija 2006 in njihovi reviziji avgusta 2008 z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 812/2008 [18] se je uvoz, deklariran s poreklom iz Rusije, vztrajno zmanjševal in ostal nizek do konca OPP.
In the same period, prices of dumped imports from Russia remained relatively low.
V istem obdobju so cene dampinškega uvoza iz Rusije ostale relativno nizke.
Production capacity and spare capacity in Russia
Proizvodna zmogljivost in prosta zmogljivost v Rusiji
As far as the total production capacity of the SPT in Russia is concerned, and in the absence of verified data, different sources of information publicly available point to a production capacity that is largely in excess of demand on the domestic market.
Ob pomanjkanju preverjenih podatkov je iz različnih javno dostopnih virov informacij razvidno, da celotna proizvodna zmogljivost brezšivnih cevi v Rusiji znatno presega povpraševanje na domačem trgu.
Even though the Russian Union market share is not significantly above 1 %, the estimated installed Russian capacity is close to 4 million tonnes per annum.
Čeprav tržni delež Rusije v Uniji ni znatno nad 1 %, je obstoječa zmogljivost Rusije ocenjena na skoraj 4 milijone metričnih ton na leto.
The Russian industry only operates on an estimated 70 % of its production capacity.
Ruska industrija deluje zgolj na ocenjenih 70 % svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti.
By deducting the known domestic consumption and the export volumes to other markets according to the Russian export statistics there is a current spare capacity exceeding 1 million tonnes per annum which represents almost 65 % of the Union consumption.
Če odštejemo znano domačo potrošnjo in obseg izvoza na druge trge v skladu z rusko izvozno statistiko, dobimo trenutno prosto zmogljivost, ki presega 1 milijon metričnih ton na leto, kar predstavlja skoraj 65 % potrošnje Unije.
In spite of this current overcapacity and based on information provided by the complainant which was not contested by the interested parties, it appears that the Russian capacity may be further increased in the next years.
Kljub trenutnem presežku zmogljivosti in na podlagi informacij pritožnika, ki jim zainteresirane strani niso nasprotovale, se zdi, da se zmogljivost Rusije v naslednjih letih lahko še dodatno poveča.
One exporting producer in Russia argued that it was operating at a higher capacity rate and had no intention to expand its production capacity in the near future.
En proizvajalec izvoznik v Rusiji je trdil, da deluje na višji stopnji zmogljivosti in v bližnji prihodnosti nima namena povečati svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti.
This export producer also claimed that according to a reputable market publication, the Russian industry SPT capacity utilisation rates were ‘high’ and that the amount of production of product concerned in Russia was in line with domestic consumption.
Ta proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da so v skladu z ugledno tržno raziskavo stopnje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti ruske industrije pri proizvodnji brezšivnih cevi „visoke“ ter da je obseg proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka v Rusiji v skladu z domačo potrošnjo.
However, the information provided by the company was not available in the file as the company had chosen not to cooperate, nor could it be verified.
Ker se je družba odločila, da ne bo sodelovala, informacije, ki jih je predložila, niso bile na voljo v dokumentaciji niti jih ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
Furthermore, the term ‘high’ was not quantified in the publication and it was not possible to reach a conclusion on this.. Hence the comments regarding production and consumption levels in Russia of the product concerned had no devaluating effects on the existence of significant spare capacity in Russia.
Poleg tega v tej publikaciji izraz „visok“ ni bil uporabljen in zato glede tega ni bilo možno priti do zaključka. Zato pripombe glede stopnje proizvodnje in potrošnje zadevnega izdelka v Rusiji niso razvrednotile pomena ugotovitve o obstoju znatne proste zmogljivosti v Rusiji.
It should be noted that the estimated installed capacity of close to 4 million tonnes per annum has not been contested after disclosure of the investigation findings to all interested parties.
Treba je opomniti, da po razkritju ugotovitev preiskave vsem zainteresiranim stranem obstoječi zmogljivosti, ocenjeni na skoraj 4 milijone metričnih ton na leto, ni nihče nasprotoval.
Attractiveness of the Union market and other third countries markets
Privlačnost trga Unije in drugih trgov tretjih držav
As mentioned above, there is an important production overcapacity on the Russian domestic market suggesting a strong and natural need to find alternative markets to absorb this excess in production capacity.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je na ruskem domačem trgu proizvodna zmogljivost znatno prevelika, kar kaže na to, da je Rusija prisiljena poiskati druge trge, ki bodo absorbirali ta presežek proizvodne zmogljivosti.
The Union market is one of the biggest markets in the world and is still growing.
Trg Unije je eden od največjih trgov na svetu in se še povečuje.
It is also clear, based on information collected during the investigation that Russian companies have shown a big interest in developing their presence on one of the biggest markets in the world and maintaining a significant market share on the Union market.
Glede na informacije, zbrane med preiskavo, je očitno, da so ruske družbe pokazale velik interes za okrepitev svoje prisotnosti na enem od največjih trgov na svetu in ohranjanje znatnega tržnega deleža na trgu Unije.
One exporting producer in Russia argued that the information submitted as requested in the notice of initiation should have been the basis for the findings regarding the existence of dumping and the likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury rather than making a determination based on best facts available.
En proizvajalec izvoznik v Rusiji je trdil, da bi morale biti informacije, predložene v skladu z zahtevami iz obvestila o začetku, osnova za ugotovitve o obstoju dampinga ter verjetnosti ponovitve dampinga in škode, namesto da se ugotavlja na podlagi najboljših razpoložljivih dejstev.
However, when this exporting producer in Russia chose to not further cooperate, it stated that due to internal restructuring processes, the completion of the questionnaire, which would include the information submitted after initiation, could not be used to determine in its case whether there is a likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping or whether the circumstances changed to the degree justifying the review of the level of the measures.
Vendar ko se je ta ruski proizvajalec izvoznik odločil, da ne bo nadaljeval sodelovanja, je navedel, da zaradi postopkov notranjega prestrukturiranja, izpolnjenega vprašalnika, ki bi vključeval informacije, predložene po začetku postopka, ne bi bilo mogoče uporabiti za ugotavljanje, ali obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga oziroma ali so se okoliščine spremenile tako, da upravičujejo pregled ravni ukrepov.
Therefore, it was considered that this information could not be used.
Zato se je ocenilo, da teh informacij ni mogoče uporabiti.
In view of the findings described above, it can be concluded that imports from Russia are still being dumped and that there is a strong likelihood of continuation of dumping.
Na podlagi navedenih ugotovitev je mogoče skleniti, da se iz Rusije še vedno uvaža po dampinških cenah in da se bo damping z veliko verjetnostjo nadaljeval.
Given the current and potential future spare capacity in Russia and the fact that the Union market is one of the largest market in the world with attractive level of prices, it can be concluded that the Russian exporters are likely to further increase their exports to the Union at dumped prices should the anti-dumping measures be allowed to lapse.
Glede na trenutno in prihodnjo možno prosto zmogljivost v Rusiji ter glede na to, da je trg Unije eden od največjih trgov na svetu s privlačno ravnjo cen, je mogoče skleniti, da bodo ruski izvozniki v primeru izteka veljavnosti protidampinških ukrepov verjetno še dodatno povečali svoj izvoz v Unijo po dampinških cenah.
Further to the analysis of the existence of dumping during the RIP (recitals 54 to 61 above), the likelihood of continuation of dumping was also examined.
Po analizi obstoja dampinga v OPP (uvodne izjave 54 do 61) je bilo proučeno tudi, ali obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga.
In this respect, the following elements were analysed; the volume and prices of dumped imports from Ukraine, the production capacity and the spare capacity in Ukraine and the attractiveness of the Union market and other third markets.
V zvezi s tem so bili analizirani naslednji elementi: obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza iz Ukrajine, proizvodna zmogljivost in prosta zmogljivost v Ukrajini ter privlačnost trga Unije in drugih trgov tretjih držav.
Volume and prices of dumped imports from Ukraine
Obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza iz Ukrajine
After the imposition of definitive measures in June 2006, imports from Ukraine decreased significantly and have remained at a rather low level with a Union market share of below 2 %.
Po uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov junija 2006 se je uvoz iz Ukrajine znatno zmanjšal in ostal na precej nizki ravni s tržnim deležem Unije manj kot 2 %.
In the same period, prices of dumped imports from Ukraine remained relatively low.
V istem obdobju so cene dampinškega uvoza iz Ukrajine ostale relativno nizke.