natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is also clear from the information provided that the exported products in question were indeed decorated although the exporting producer allegedly did not bear the full costs associated with the added value that can be assigned to the decoration.
Iz predloženih podatkov je tudi jasno, da so bili zadevni izvoženi izdelki dejansko okrašeni, čeprav proizvajalec izvoznik domnevno ni v celoti kril stroškov, povezanih z dodano vrednostjo okrasitve.
However, this is not a factor that can justify a price adjustment for differences in physical characteristics with the like product in the analogue country.
Vendar pa to ni dejavnik, ki bi lahko upravičil prilagoditev cene zaradi razlik v fizikalnih značilnostih v primerjavi s podobnim izdelkom v primerljivi državi.
In any event, considering the late stage of the proceeding at which this claim was made, the data submitted in support of the claim cannot be verified.
Glede na to, da je bil zahtevek predložen pozno v postopku, podatkov v podporo zahtevku v vsakem primeru ni mogoče preveriti.
Accordingly, the claim is hereby rejected.
Zahtevek se zato zavrne.
In view of the wide variety of possible combinations of ceramic tableware sets produced and sold in the PRC and in Brazil, respectively, for the purpose of achieving a fair price comparability, it was considered necessary to group different sets together based on the number and type of items combined in a set.
Glede na veliko število možnih kombinacij garnitur keramične namizne posode, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v LRK in Braziliji, se je zaradi poštene primerljivosti cen štelo za potrebno, da se različne garniture razvrstijo po skupinah glede na število in vrsto izdelkov v garnituri.
The average domestic sales price in the analogue country for the different combinations of sets thus grouped together was compared with the export price for combinations of sets falling within those groups.
Povprečna domača prodajna cena različnih kombinacij tako razvrščenih garnitur v primerljivi državi je bila primerjana z izvozno ceno za kombinacije garnitur iz navedenih skupin.
One exporting producer claimed that due to the wide variety of possible product combinations making up a set, the grouping methodology does not allow for a fair price comparison, as it fails to take into account the characteristics of each piece making up a set.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da zaradi najrazličnejših možnih kombinacij izdelkov, ki sestavljajo garnituro, metodologija razvrščanja v skupine ne omogoča poštene primerjave cen, saj ne upošteva značilnosti vsakega kosa, ki tvori garnituro.
Therefore, this exporting producer claimed that sets should be excluded from the dumping margin calculation.
Zato je ta proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da bi bilo treba garniture izključiti iz izračuna stopnje dampinga.
It is recalled that the dumping calculations for sets are based on a comparison of the average price per kg and not on a piece-by-piece basis.
Opozoriti je treba, da izračun dampinga za garniture temelji na primerjavi povprečne cene na kg, in ne na posameznih kosih.
It is therefore not necessary to establish the exact combination of different pieces in each set for a fair price comparison with regard to sets.
Zato pri garniturah za pošteno primerjavo cen ni treba določiti točne kombinacije različnih kosov v vsaki garnituri.
The grouping methodology used takes into account the basic characteristics of different set combinations in so far as the sets are identified as e.g. coffee and/or tea sets, dinner sets or other sets and also the number of pieces combined.
Metodologija razvrščanja v skupine upošteva osnovne značilnosti različnih kombinacij garnitur, če so garniture opredeljene kot npr. kavni in/ali čajni servis ali jedilni servis, pa tudi število kosov v kombinaciji.
In these circumstances, it is considered that a fair comparison has been made in regard to sets in the sense of Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da je bila v zvezi z garniturami opravljena poštena primerjava v smislu člena 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
It follows that that claim cannot be accepted.
Te trditve zato ni mogoče sprejeti.
Furthermore, as described in recital (99) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation established that Chinese exporting producers generally qualify their product in up to five different grades ranging from A to E with significant price differences.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (99) začasne uredbe, je poleg tega preiskava v zvezi s tem pokazala, da kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki svoje izdelke v splošnem razvrščajo v največ pet različnih kakovostnih razredov od A do E, katerih cene se zelo razlikujejo.
The vast majority of exports to the Union consist however of A-grade, B-grade or C-grade or a combination thereof.
Velika večina izvoza v Unijo zajema razrede A, B in C ali njihove kombinacije.
This grading is however not universal or based on any general industry-wide standard but is rather company specific and allows for price differentiation.
Vendar to razvrščanje ni splošno in ne temelji na splošnem panožnem standardu, temveč se po družbah razlikuje in omogoča diferenciacijo cen.
On the other hand, the analogue country producer only sells the equivalent of A-grade on the domestic Brazilian market and price comparability was therefore found to be affected.
Po drugi strani proizvajalec iz primerljive države na domačem brazilskem trgu prodaja le izdelke, podobne izdelkom iz razreda A, kar vpliva na primerljivost cen.
Accordingly, the export price was adjusted upwards to Chinese A-grade level in order to be comparable with the product sold by the analogue producer on the Brazilian market.
Izvozna cena je bila zato prilagojena navzgor ravni kitajskega razreda A, da bi se omogočila primerjava z izdelkom, ki ga primerljivi proizvajalec prodaja na brazilskem trgu.
This level of this adjustment was individually established for each of the sampled companies, where appropriate and based on the actual and verified price difference between the different grades.
Ta raven prilagoditve je bila po potrebi določena individualno za vsako od vzorčenih družb, in sicer na podlagi dejanske in preverjene razlike v ceni med različnimi kakovostnimi razredi.
Following the final disclosure one sampled exporting producer came forward and claimed that parts of its export sales that were sold via an unrelated trader consisted of a combination of A-grade and B-grade and should therefore also be adjusted to the price level of A-grade. It claimed that the price difference amounted to 25 % and provided copies of invoices and price quotations as supporting evidence.
Po dokončnem razkritju je en vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je šlo pri delih njegovega izvoza, opravljenega prek nepovezanega trgovca, za kombinacijo blaga razredov A in B, zato bi morala biti tudi njegova izvozna cena prilagojena cenovni ravni razreda A. Trdil je, da je razlika v ceni znašala 25 %, v dokaz pa je predložil kopije faktur in predračunov.
However, this information was not provided either during the investigation, including the verification visit, or after the disclosure of the Commission's provisional findings.
Vendar te informacije niso bile predložene niti med preiskavo (vključno s preveritvenim obiskom) niti po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev Komisije.
On the contrary, this producer has, throughout the investigation, indicated that it only exported A-grade products. No full price list was provided, despite being requested to do so in the questionnaire, to quantify the alleged price difference between the different grades, only a limited number of price quotations.
Prav nasprotno, ta proizvajalec je med preiskavo ves čas trdil, da izvaža zgolj izdelke razreda A. Čeprav je bilo to od njega zahtevano v vprašalniku, ni predložil popolnega cenika, da bi se lahko opredelila domnevna razlika v ceni med različnimi razredi; predložil je le manjše število predračunov.
Under such circumstances and considering the very late stage in the proceedings at which the information was submitted the reliability thereof is questionable and cannot in any event be verified.
Zato in ker je informacije predložil zelo pozno v postopku, je njihova zanesljivost vprašljiva, v vsakem primeru pa jih ni mogoče preveriti.
Accordingly, the claim is rejected.
Zahtevek se zato zavrne.
Second, as described in recital (98) of the provisional Regulation it was examined whether a level of trade adjustment under Article 2(10)(d) of the basic Regulation was warranted.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (98) začasne uredbe, je bilo tudi preverjeno, ali je bila prilagoditev ravni trgovine v skladu s členom 2(10)(d) osnovne uredbe utemeljena.
It was found that the export price is at a different level of trade from the normal value as Chinese exports were essentially made at wholesale level whereas the domestic sales in the analogue country were also made at a retail level.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je izvozna cena na drugi ravni trgovine kot normalna vrednost, ker je bil kitajski izvoz opravljen pretežno na veleprodajni ravni, domača prodaja v primerljivi državi pa je bila opravljena tudi na maloprodajni ravni.
The investigation further established that on both markets the different distribution channels affected the price level, thus affecting fair price comparability between export price and normal value.
Preiskava je pokazala tudi, da so različni distribucijski kanali na obeh trgih vplivali na raven cen in tako tudi na pošteno primerljivost izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti.
Accordingly, in order to make a fair comparison between the export price and the normal value, the latter was established on a per product type basis and adjusted for each level of trade by using the price differences found between the different levels of trade in the analogue country.
Da bi se omogočila poštena primerjava izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti, je bila slednja določena za vsako vrsto izdelka posebej in prilagojena za vsako raven trgovine s pomočjo razlik v ceni med različnimi ravnmi trgovine v primerljivi državi.
It is recalled that, where appropriate, a further level of trade adjustment was made in the provisional Regulation on the basis of the price difference found in respect of quantities sold at each level of trade (recital (98) of the provisional Regulation).
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila v začasni uredbi raven trgovine po potrebi dodatno prilagojena, in sicer na podlagi cenovne razlike glede na prodane količine na posamezni ravni trgovine (uvodna izjava (98) začasne uredbe).
This further adjustment was deemed justified as the investigation, at the provisional stage, had indicated that while the majority of Chinese export sales were made in large quantities, the majority of domestic sales were made in smaller quantities resulting in price differences on the same level of trade.
Ta dodatna prilagoditev je veljala za upravičeno, ker je začasna preiskava pokazala, da je Kitajska večinoma izvažala v velikih količinah, pri večini domače prodaje v primerljivi državi pa je šlo za manjše količine, zaradi česar so se cene na enaki ravni trgovine razlikovale.
However, further investigation and a more detailed analysis of the domestic sales transactions in the analogue country have, contrary to the provisional findings, demonstrated that the ratio of small and large quantities sold by the analogue producer is similar to that of the Chinese exporting producers.
Vendar sta nadaljnja preiskava in podrobnejša analiza domačih prodajnih poslov v primerljivi državi v nasprotju z začasnimi ugotovitvami pokazali, da je razmerje med manjšimi in velikimi količinami, ki jih je prodal primerljivi proizvajalec, podobno tistemu pri kitajskih proizvajalcih izvoznikih.
Accordingly, this adjustment is no longer considered appropriate or justified.
Zato se ta prilagoditev ne šteje več za primerno in upravičeno.
Third, as described in recital (100) of the provisional Regulation the investigation established that the Brazilian producer only sells branded products on the Brazilian market whereas Chinese exporting producers do not export branded products but rather private label products or generic ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (100) začasne uredbe, je preiskava pokazala tudi, da brazilski proizvajalec na brazilskem trgu prodaja le izdelke z blagovno znamko, kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki pa ne izvažajo izdelkov z blagovno znamko, ampak izdelke lastnih blagovnih znamk ali generično keramično namizno in kuhinjsko posodo.
Branded products are normally perceived by customers to be products signifying a certain prestige, assured quality and design thus commanding a higher market price whereas generic and/or private label products, whilst having the same physical and technical characteristics, are usually sold at considerably lower price levels.
Stranke običajno dojemajo izdelke z blagovno znamko kot izdelke z določenim ugledom, zagotovljeno kakovostjo in oblikovanjem, kar pomeni višjo tržno ceno, generični izdelki in/ali izdelki lastnih blagovnih znamk, ki imajo sicer enake fizikalne in tehnične značilnosti, pa se običajno prodajajo po znatno nižjih cenah.
While the additional value of a branded product cannot generally be exactly quantified in the abstract as it varies from brand to brand and depends on many different factors, such as customer perception, brand recognition, and other non-quantifiable factors, the Brazilian producer has, in this particular case, confirmed that its branded products can be sold at significantly higher prices on the Brazilian market than other non-branded products.
Čeprav dodane vrednosti izdelka z blagovno znamko običajno ni mogoče natančno količinsko opredeliti, ker se med blagovnimi znamkami razlikuje in nanjo vpliva veliko različnih dejavnikov, kot so dojemanje potrošnikov, prepoznavanje znamke in drugi dejavniki, ki niso količinsko opredeljivi, je brazilski proizvajalec v tem primeru potrdil, da se lahko njegovi izdelki z blagovno znamko na brazilskem trgu prodajo po bistveno višjih cenah kot drugi izdelki brez blagovne znamke.
Furthermore, a report concerning the Brazilian market for tableware and kitchenware products confirmed that Brazilian customers are extremely brand-orientated and that the Brazilian analogue country producer is a long established and very well-known producer.
Poleg tega je poročilo o brazilskem trgu namizne in kuhinjske posode potrdilo, da brazilski kupci dajejo prednost znanim blagovnim znamkam ter da je brazilski proizvajalec v primerljivi državi uveljavljen in znan proizvajalec.
In view of these elements, a downward adjustment of 40 % of the domestic sales price was made to the normal value pursuant to Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost prilagojena, pri čemer je bila domača prodajna cena popravljena za 40 % navzdol.
With regard to the above mentioned adjustment it is recalled that two exporting producers have questioned both the basis on which the adjustment was made as well as the level of the adjustment (see recital (67) above).
Glede navedene prilagoditve je treba opozoriti, da sta dva proizvajalca izvoznika izrazila pomislek glede podlage, na kateri je bila izvedena prilagoditev, pa tudi glede ravni prilagoditve (glej uvodno izjavo (67)).
It is however uncontested that a branded product commands a higher sales price than an identical non-branded product and that the price comparability is thus affected.
Vendar je nesporno, da se izdelek z blagovno znamko prodaja po višji ceni kot izdelek brez nje in da to vpliva na primerljivost cen.
Moreover, in addition to the information provided by the producer in the analogue country, actual and verified price data from a cooperating producer in Thailand, as well as information received from one Union producer after the provisional disclosure, have confirmed that the level of adjustment is appropriate.
Poleg informacij, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec iz primerljive države, so dejanski in preverjeni podatki o cenah, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči izvoznik na Tajskem, ter podatki, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec Unije po začasnem razkritju, potrdili, da je raven prilagoditve primerna.
In particular, the market situation in Thailand was found to be comparable with that of Brazil, since only a few well known and long-established brands exist.
Zlasti je bilo ugotovljeno, da je položaj na tajskem trgu primerljiv s tistim na brazilskem, saj je na njem le nekaj znanih in uveljavljenih blagovnih znamk.
Therefore, those claims cannot be accepted.
Zato teh trditev ni mogoče sprejeti.
Following the final disclosure no exporting producers maintained their objection to this adjustment while the association of complainants claimed that the branding adjustment is too high, in particular with regard to non-porcelain products.
Po dokončnem razkritju noben proizvajalec izvoznik ni več nasprotoval tej prilagoditvi, združenje pritožnikov pa je trdilo, da je prilagoditev zaradi blagovne znamke previsoka, zlasti pri neporcelanastih izdelkih.
In support of this claim the complainant referred to price lists and information provided by some Union producers.
V podporo tej trditvi se je pritožnik skliceval na cenike in informacije, ki so jih predložili nekateri proizvajalci Unije.
While the information submitted confirms the Commission's findings that the added value of a brand on any given market is company/brand-specific, the information provided is not such as to put into question the level of adjustment that was determined for the branded products sold by the analogue producer on the domestic Brazilian market as the information provided only concerned the Union market.
Predložene informacije sicer potrjujejo ugotovitve Komisije, da je dodana vrednost blagovne znamke na katerem koli trgu odvisna od posamezne družbe ali blagovne znamke, obenem pa ne nasprotujejo ravni prilagoditve, ki je bila določena za izdelke z blagovno znamko, ki jih primerljivi proizvajalec prodaja na domačem brazilskem trgu, saj se predložene informacije nanašajo samo na trg Unije.
In view of the large number of Union producers, the diversity of the Union market with its regional differences, also as regards brand orientation, and the high market share of Chinese imports, the situation of the Union market is quite different to the Brazilian one.
Glede na veliko število proizvajalcev Unije, raznolikost trga Unije, vključno z regionalnimi razlikami in odnosom do blagovnih znamk, ter visok tržni delež uvoza iz LRK se položaj na trgu Unije precej razlikuje od tistega na brazilskem trgu.
Therefore, and in light of the considerations in recitals (90) and (91) above, that claim cannot be accepted.
Iz teh razlogov in glede na ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (90) in (91) te trditve ni mogoče sprejeti.
As described in recital (101) of the provisional Regulation, further adjustments were made, where appropriate, in respect of transport, insurance, handling and ancillary costs, packing, credit, bank charges and commissions in all cases where they were demonstrated to affect price comparability.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (101) začasne uredbe, so bile po potrebi izvedene dodatne prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški prevoza in zavarovanja, manipulativnimi in drugimi s tem povezanimi stroški, stroški pakiranja, kredita, bančnimi stroški in stroški provizije v vseh primerih, v katerih so take razlike dokazano vplivale na primerljivost cen.
In the absence of comments, the methodology used for calculating the dumping margins, as set out in recitals (102) to (105) of the provisional Regulation, is confirmed.
Ker nobena stran ni predložila pripomb, se potrjuje metodologija za izračun dampinških stopenj, kot so določene v uvodnih izjavah od (102) do (105) začasne uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, the Commission was informed that some trading companies, which do not produce the product concerned, had erroneously been named in Annex I to the provisional Regulation and hence been subject to the dumping duty established for cooperating exporting producers.
Po začasnem razkritju je bila Komisija obveščena, da so bile nekatere trgovske družbe, ki ne proizvajajo zadevnega izdelka, pomotoma navedene v Prilogi I k začasni uredbi, in je zato zanje veljala dampinška dajatev, določena za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike.
The Commission informed these companies of its intention to have them removed from Annex I and granted them the opportunity to provide comments.
Komisija je te družbe obvestila, da jih bo črtala iz Priloge I, in jim zagotovila možnost, da predložijo pripombe.
After having examined the comments received, several trading companies have been removed from Annex 1. Where appropriate, they have been replaced with the related cooperating exporting producer.
Po preučitvi prejetih pripomb je bilo več trgovskih družb črtanih iz Priloge I. Po potrebi so bile nadomeščene s povezanimi sodelujočimi proizvajalci izvozniki.
Taking into account the adjustments made to the normal value and to the export price as set out in recitals (67) – (94) above, and in the absence of any further comments, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Ob upoštevanju prilagoditev normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene iz uvodnih izjav od (67) do (94) in ker ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Period considered
Obravnavano obdobje
After final disclosure, several interested parties reiterated that the period considered should have started in 2009 instead of 2008 as the economic crisis would have started in 2008 and the trend between 2009 and 2011 would be clear.
Po dokončnem razkritju je več zainteresiranih strani ponovilo, da bi se obravnavano obdobje moralo začeti leta 2009 namesto 2008, ker se je gospodarska kriza začela leta 2008, gibanja med letoma 2009 in 2011 pa naj bi bila jasna.
In a joint submission several importers questioned the calculation method of the Union production figure given in recital (108) of the provisional Regulation.
V skupnem stališču je več uvoznikov podvomilo v metodo za izračun proizvodnje Unije iz uvodne izjave (108) začasne uredbe.
Several interested parties repeated these comments after final disclosure.
Več zainteresiranih strani je te pripombe po dokončnem razkritju ponovilo.
In particular, they considered that the standing requirement would not have been met by the complainants as the available PRODCOM statistics would suggest a much higher level of EU production of the like product than the 240200 tonne figure mentioned in the said recital, as a result of which the complainants would represent less than 25 % of Union production of the like product.
Zlasti so menili, da pritožniki ne bi izpolnili zahteve glede reprezentativnosti, saj statistični podatki PRODCOM kažejo na precej višjo stopnjo proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v EU kot 240200 ton iz navedene uvodne izjave, kar pomeni, da bi pritožniki predstavljali manj kot 25 % proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v EU.
These parties had calculated a Union production figure of 313187 tonnes during the IP and they arrived at this figure by using full PRODCOM data for porcelain ceramic tableware and kitchenware and making an 20 % downwards adjustment for non-porcelain ceramic tableware and kitchenware, by analogy to the methodology applied by the complainant and in the investigation for establishing import volumes.
Te strani so izračunale, da je proizvodnja v EU v OP znašala 313187 ton; do te vrednosti so prišle po analogiji z metodo, ki jo je uporabil pritožnik in je bila uporabljena v preiskavi za določitev obsega uvoza, in sicer z uporabo celotnih podatkov PRODCOM za porcelanasto keramično namizno in kuhinjsko posodo in prilagoditvijo za 20 % navzdol za neporcelanasto keramično namizno in kuhinjsko posodo.
In this respect it should be noted that, first, in the framework of the statutory analysis of an anti-dumping complaint and in accordance with Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation, the Commission services carried out a thorough examination before initiation.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da so službe Komisije v okviru predpisane analize protidampinške pritožbe in v skladu s členom 5(4) osnovne uredbe pred začetkom postopka opravile temeljito preverjanje reprezentativnosti.