natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The applicant’s estimation of the capacity utilisation of PRC producers is around 63 % giving an unused capacity of more than 500000 tonnes.
Vložnikova ocena izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti kitajskih proizvajalcev je okoli 63 %, kar pomeni, da imajo neizkoriščene zmogljivosti več kot 500000 ton.
The applicant also provided information about further production facilities that are being set up and the size of the domestic market.
Vložnik je prav tako predložil informacije o dodatnih proizvodnih obratih, ki se odpirajo, in velikosti domačega trga.
PRC producers thus have significant spare capacities largely exceeding not only the export quantity to the Union during the RIP but the total Union consumption.
Kitajski proizvajalci imajo tako znatne proste zmogljivosti, ki v veliki meri presegajo ne samo izvožene količine v Unijo v OPP, ampak celotno potrošnjo Unije.
Thus, the capacity to vastly increase export quantities to the Union exists, in particular, because there are no indications that third country markets or the domestic market could absorb any additional production in such quantities.
Obstaja torej zmogljivost za veliko povečanje izvoznih količin v Unijo, zlasti ker ne kaže, da bi lahko trgi tretjih držav ali domači trg absorbirali dodatno proizvodnjo v takih količinah.
In this regard it should be noted that it is very unlikely that the domestic market in the PRC, due to the presence of a considerable number of competing producers, would be able to absorb significant volumes of these spare capacities.
S tem v zvezi je treba opozoriti, da je malo verjetno, da bi bil domači trg v LRK zaradi prisotnosti precejšnjega števila konkurenčnih proizvajalcev sploh sposoben absorbirati znatne količine neizkoriščene zmogljivosti.
Circumvention practices
Prakse izogibanja
This is considered as a further indication that PRC exports would likely increase in volume and enter the Union market at dumped prices, should measures be repealed.
To se šteje kot še en pokazatelj, da bi se v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov obseg kitajskega izvoza verjetno povečal in vstopil na trg Unije po dampinških cenah.
There are two known producers in South Africa.
V Južni Afriki sta dva znana proizvajalca.
As explained above, one exporting producer cooperated in this review investigation.
Kot je navedeno, je v tej preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom sodeloval en proizvajalec izvoznik.
The other known producer showed no interest in exporting to the Union stating its production capacities are fully utilised and sold on the domestic South African market.
Drugi znani proizvajalec ni pokazal nobenega interesa za izvažanje v Unijo in je trdil, da so bile njegove proizvodne zmogljivosti v celoti izkoriščene in prodane na domačem južnoafriškem trgu.
Imports from South Africa dropped considerably since the imposition of the original measures.
Uvoz iz Južne Afrike se je od uvedbe prvotnih ukrepov znatno zmanjšal.
The market share of imports from South Africa (0,1 %) was below the de minimis threshold during the RIP, amounting in total to 281 tonnes.
Tržni delež uvoza iz Južne Afrike (0,1 %) je bil v OPP pod pragom de minimis in je znašal skupno 281 ton.
Moreover, most of these imports were eventually destined for offshore use, which has developed considerably since the previous investigation and were not customs cleared in the EU.
Večina tega uvoza je bila v končnem namenjena za uporabo na morju, ki se je od prejšnje preiskave bistveno razvila, in v EU ni bila carinjena.
In order to establish whether dumping would continue should measures be repealed, information provided by the cooperating exporter relating to export volumes and prices to the Union and to third countries, unused capacity and stocks and the situation of the South African domestic market were examined.
Za določitev, ali bi se damping v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov nadaljeval, so bile proučene informacije, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči izvoznik glede obsega izvoza in cen za Unijo in tretje države, neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti in zalog ter položaja na južnoafriškem domačem trgu.
The cooperating exporter of the product concerned provided information regarding volumes and prices in export markets other than the Union.
Sodelujoči izvoznik zadevnega izdelka je predložil informacije glede obsega in cen na izvoznih trgih, razen trga Unije.
The exporting producer sells a considerable part of its production on exports markets even though export volumes decreased during the period under consideration.
Proizvajalec izvoznik prodaja znaten del svoje proizvodnje na izvoznih trgih, čeprav se je obseg izvoza v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal.
The company’s export activity is focused mostly on two specific segments of the market: ropes for deep shaft mining and offshore drilling related applications.
Izvozna dejavnost družbe se osredotoča večinoma na dva posebna segmenta trga: vrvi za rudarstvo in vrtanje na morju.
The company’s export prices to third countries compared to the export prices to the Union including the applicable anti-dumping duty were overall significantly higher in all years in the period under consideration (30 % to 70 %).
Izvozne cene družbe za tretje države so bile v primerjavi z izvoznimi cenami za Unijo, vključno z uporabljeno protidampinško dajatvijo, na splošno v vseh letih obravnavanega obdobja bistveno višje (30 % do 70 %).
The price advantage reached by the exporter on other third country markets in comparison to prices on the Union market suggests that the exporter would not enter the Union market with significant quantities in the future, should measures be repealed.
Cenovna prednost izvoznika na trgih drugih tretjih držav v primerjavi s cenami na trgu Unije kaže na to, da izvoznik v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov v prihodnosti ne bi vstopal na trg Unije z znatnimi količinami.
In this regard, it was also considered that, as explained in recital (61) above, the export activities of the company are focused on products that are not primarily demanded on the Union market.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 61, se je glede tega tudi štelo, da se izvozne dejavnosti družbe osredotočajo na izdelke, po katerih na trgu Unije v glavnem ni povpraševanja.
Since the last investigation, the cooperating exporting producer kept stocks at a stable level.
Po zadnji preiskavi je sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik ohranjal zaloge na stabilni ravni.
The capacity utilisation (around 70-75 %) was also at customary levels given the technical constraints in the production process.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti (okoli 70–75 %) je bila prav tako na običajni ravni glede na tehnične omejitve v proizvodnem procesu.
The maximum available spare capacity is in the range 1500-3500 tonnes.
Največja prosta zmogljivost je v obsegu med 1500 in 3500 tonami.
The exporting producer does not plan to expand its production capacities by significant amounts.
Proizvajalec izvoznik ne načrtuje znatnega povečanja svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti.
The capacity to increase export quantities to the Union seems very limited in view of the fact that third country markets or the domestic market could absorb any additional production.
Glede na dejstvo, da bi lahko trgi tretjih držav ali domači trg absorbirali dodatno proizvodnjo, je videti, da je zmogljivost za povečanje izvoznih količin za Unijo zelo omejena.
It is furthermore noted that production goes mainly to domestic market where high profits are achieved, therefore the company has no interest to export significant quantities to the Union.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da je proizvodnja usmerjena predvsem na domači trg, kjer dosega visoke dobičke, zato družba nima interesa izvažati znatnih količin v Unijo.
Given the absence of cooperation from the known Ukrainian exporting producer, as explained in recital (14) above, findings were based on facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ker znani ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik ni sodeloval, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14, so ugotovitve temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Since little information is known about the Ukrainian industry, the following conclusions rely on the information provided in the applicant’s review request and publicly available trade statistics.
Ker je o ukrajinski industriji na voljo le malo informacij, se naslednji sklepi opirajo na informacije iz vložnikovega zahtevka za pregled in javno razpoložljivih statističnih podatkov o trgovini.
It is noted that there are no other known producers in Ukraine and that the following considerations regarding in particular production capacities, relate to the known exporting producer.
Treba je opozoriti, da v Ukrajini ni drugih znanih proizvajalcev in da se naslednji premisleki, zlasti glede proizvodnih zmogljivosti, nanašajo na znanega proizvajalca izvoznika.
In order to establish whether dumping would be likely to continue should measures be repealed, the export prices to third countries and to the Union, unused capacities and circumvention practices were examined.
Za ugotovitev, ali bi se damping v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov nadaljeval, so bile proučene izvozne cene za tretje države in Unijo, neizkoriščene zmogljivosti in izogibanje.
In the absence of any other more reliable information, the information provided for in the request with regard to other export markets, based on publicly available statistics, has been taken into account.
Ker ni bilo drugih zanesljivejših informacij, so bile upoštevane informacije, predložene v zahtevku glede izvoznih trgov, ki so temeljile na javno razpoložljivih statističnih podatkih.
An analysis of the figures available showed that the average export prices to these countries were significantly below the average export prices to the Union.
Analiza razpoložljivih številk je pokazala, da so bile povprečne izvozne cene v te države precej pod povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami za Unijo.
As already explained above, in the case of the PRC and South Africa, export prices to other third countries were considered as an indicator for the likely price level for export sales to the Union, should measures be repealed.
Kot je že bilo pojasnjeno v primeru LRK in Južne Afrike, so se izvozne cene za druge tretje države štele kot kazalec, kakšna bi bila verjetna raven cen za izvoz v Unijo ob razveljavitvi ukrepov.
On this basis, it was concluded that there is a considerable margin to reduce export prices to the Union, and very likely at dumped levels.
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da bi se lahko izvozne cene za Unijo znatno znižale, po vsej verjetnosti na dampinške stopnje.
In recent years the two previously known exporting producers merged their activities.
V zadnjih letih sta dva predhodno znana proizvajalca izvoznika združila svoje dejavnosti.
As a result, the production capacity as established in the last investigation was downsized.
Zato se je proizvodna zmogljivost iz zadnje preiskave zmanjšala.
According to the evidence available in the request and as stated by the known exporting producer, the estimated production capacity in Ukraine is in the range 35000-40000 tonnes, of which around 70 % is used for actual production.
Glede na razpoložljive dokaze iz zahtevka in po navedbah znanega proizvajalca izvoznika je ocenjena proizvodna zmogljivost v Ukrajini med 35000 in 40000, od tega je okoli 70 % uporabljenih za dejansko proizvodnjo.
The spare capacity, which is in the range 10500-12000 tonnes, thus indicates that the capacity to significantly increase export quantities to the Union does exist.
Prosta zmogljivost je v obsegu med 10500 in 12000 tonami in kaže, da obstaja zmogljivost za znatno povečanje izvoznih količin v Unijo.
The apparent consumption in Ukraine calculated on the basis of the known production and statistical information about imports and exports indicates that the domestic market cannot absorb any additional capacities.
Domnevna potrošnja v Ukrajini, izračunana na podlagi znanih informacij o proizvodnji in statističnih informacij o uvozu in izvozu kaže, da domači trg ne more absorbirati dodatnih zmogljivosti.
Ukraine thus remains the country from where the redirection of the unused capacities to the Union market is the most imminent from all countries concerned, in particular because there are no indications that third country markets or the domestic market could absorb any additional production.
Ukrajina tako med vsemi zadevnimi državami ostaja država, kjer je preusmeritev neizkoriščene zmogljivosti na trg Unije največja, zlasti ker ne kaže, da bi lahko trgi tretjih držav ali domači trg absorbirali dodatno proizvodnjo.
Following the imposition of the existing measures on imports of SWR from Ukraine, it was found that these measures were being circumvented by imports of SWR from Moldova.
Po uvedbi obstoječih ukrepov na uvoz JŽV iz Ukrajine pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je uvoz JŽV iz Moldavije izogibal tem ukrepom.
It was considered that the circumvention practice detected was an additional factor indicating the interest in entering the Union market and the inability to compete on the Union market at non-dumped levels.
Štelo se je, da je bila ugotovljena praksa izogibanja dodatni dejavnik, ki kaže interes za vstop na trg Unije in nezmožnost konkuriranja na trgu Unije po nedampinških stopnjah.
Continuation of significant dumping was found for the PRC and Ukraine and of a reduced level for South Africa, albeit import volumes from South Africa and Ukraine were at low levels.
Nadaljevanje znatnega dampinga je bilo ugotovljeno za LRK in Ukrajino ter po zmanjšani stopnji za Južno Afriko, čeprav je bil obseg uvoza iz Južne Afrike in Ukrajine na nižjih ravneh.
For the examination as to whether it would be likely that dumping would continue should the anti-dumping measures be repealed, spare capacities and unused stocks as well as pricing and export strategies in different markets were analysed.
Za preučitev, ali obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga v primeru razveljavitve protidampinških ukrepov, so bile proučene neizkoriščene zmogljivosti in zaloge ter strategija določanja cen in izvozna strategija na različnih trgih.
This examination showed that there were important spare capacities and accumulated stocks in the PRC and to a lesser degree in Ukraine.
Ta proučitev je pokazala, da je na voljo dovolj prostih zmogljivosti in nakopičenih zalog v LRK in v nekoliko manjši meri v Ukrajini.
No significant spare capacities or abnormal stocks were observed in South Africa.
V Južni Afriki ni bilo opaziti velikih prostih zmogljivosti ali preseženih zalog.
It was further found that export prices to other third countries were generally lower than those to the Union market in case of the PRC and Ukraine and that the Union therefore remained an attractive market for the exporting producers from these countries.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so bile v primeru LRK in Ukrajine izvozne cene za druge tretje države na splošno nižje od cen za trg Unije ter da je Unija zato ostala privlačen trg za proizvajalce izvoznike iz teh držav.
South African exports to other countries were however at significantly higher levels than exports to the Union and appeared not to be at dumped prices.
Vendar je bil izvoz Južne Afrike v druge države bistveno večji kot izvoz v Unijo in se ni zdelo, da poteka po dampinških cenah.
It was therefore concluded that exports from the PRC and Ukraine to third countries would very likely be redirected to the Union should the access to the Union market be without anti-dumping measures.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da bi bil po vsej verjetnosti izvoz iz LRK in Ukrajine v tretje države preusmerjen v Unijo, če bi bil možen dostop na trg Unije brez protidampinških ukrepov.
The available spare production capacities would also likely lead to increased imports from these countries.
Razpoložljive neizkoriščene proizvodne zmogljivosti bi verjetno pripeljale do povečanega uvoza iz teh držav.
An analysis of the pricing strategies revealed furthermore that these exports from Ukraine and the PRC would most likely be made at dumped prices.
Analiza strategij določanja cen je pokazala tudi, da bi se ta izvoz iz Ukrajine in LRK najverjetneje izvajal po dampinških cenah.
These conclusions were reinforced by the fact that for both the PRC and Ukraine the existing measures were found to have been circumvented by imports via other countries which indicated that exporting countries were not able to compete in the Union market at fair prices.
V primeru LRK in Ukrajine je te sklepe podkrepilo dejstvo, da se je izogibalo obstoječim ukrepom z uvozom preko drugih držav, kar je pokazalo, da države izvoznice niso bile sposobne konkurirati na trgu Unije po pravičnih cenah.
Conversely, the South African producer was considered able to compete with other producers, including the Union producers, on other third country markets at fair prices.
Nasprotno se je štelo, da južnoafriški proizvajalec lahko konkurira z drugimi proizvajalci, vključno s proizvajalci Unije, na drugih trgih tretjih držav po pravičnih cenah.
Considering the above, it is established for the PRC and Ukraine that dumping would likely continue in significant quantities, should measures be allowed to expire.
Glede na navedeno je bilo za LRK in Ukrajino ugotovljeno, da bi se ob izteku ukrepov damping najverjetneje nadaljeval v znatnih količinah.
On the contrary, taking into account the decreased level of dumping since the original investigation, the fact that exports to other countries were made at significantly higher prices than to the EU and the predictably low demand for South African products, it is considered that the continuation of dumped imports in significant quantities would not be likely with regard to imports from South Africa.
Nasprotno pa se ob upoštevanju zmanjšane stopnje dampinga od prvotne preiskave, dejstva, da je bil izvoz v druge države opravljen po znatno višjih cenah kot v EU, in predvidenega majhnega povpraševanja po južnoafriških izdelkih šteje, da se glede uvoza iz Južne Afrike dampinški uvoz v znatnih količinah najverjetneje ne bi nadaljeval.
The Ukrainian Government commented on the above findings arguing that the allegation that the repeal of anti-dumping measures would lead to a switch by the Ukrainian producer to the Union market is exaggerated and unreasonable.
Ukrajinska vlada je v zvezi z navedenimi ugotovitvami trdila, da so domneve glede preusmeritve ukrajinskega proizvajalca na trg Unije v primeru razveljavitve protidampinških ukrepov pretirane in neutemeljene.
To support its claim the Government argued that the measures in force resulted in the loss of customer contacts in the EU and thus the end of exports to the Union and that Ukrainian exports are now focused on the CIS and Asian markets instead.
V podporo svoji trditvi je vlada navedla, da so veljavni ukrepi privedli do izgube stikov s strankami v EU in posledično zmanjšanja izvoza v Unijo ter da se ukrajinski izvoz zdaj osredotoča na trge SND in azijske trge.
The Government however failed to comment on the attractiveness of the Union market resulting from the considerable price difference on these markets as mentioned in recital (67) above, and thus missed the point that there is indeed a likelihood that Ukrainian exports would be redirected to the Union should measures be allowed to expire.
Vendar vlada ni podala pripomb o privlačnosti trga Unije zaradi znatne razlike v cenah na teh trgih, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 67, in je tako izpustila dejstvo, da obstaja verjetnost, da bi se v primeru izteka ukrepov ukrajinski izvoz lahko preusmeril v Unijo.
After disclosure, the applicant argued that the decreasing volume of exports by the South African producer to other markets is predicted to lead to increased spare capacities that will not be absorbed by the domestic market and thus will lead to increasing imports to the Union.
Po razkritju je vložnik trdil, da naj bi zmanjšan obseg izvoza južnoafriškega proizvajalca na druge trge vodil do povečanih prostih zmogljivosti, ki jih domač trg ne bo absorbiral in bodo vodile do povečanga uvoza v Unijo.
These arguments were however not substantiated by evidence.
Vendar ti argumenti niso bili podprti z dokazi.
On the contrary, it was observed that the cooperating exporter’s falling export sales during the period considered were mitigated by domestic sales that decreased to a lesser extent during the same period.
Nasprotno, ugotovljeno je bilo, da je padajoči izvoz sodelujočega izvoznika v obravnavanem obdobju ublažila domača prodaja, ki se je v istem obdobju znižala v manjši meri.
Also, the overall sales volume of the company increased between 2009 and the IP.
Prav tako se je celotni obseg prodaje družbe povečal med letom 2009 in OP.
Thus there is no indication that the applicant’s argumentation could be justified.
Tako ni znakov, da bi bile utemeljitve vložnika lahko utemeljene.
The applicant further criticised the Commission for not taking into account the non-cooperation of the other South African producer and that the fact that this company did not export in the past is not a reason that it will not export in the future.
Vložnik je nadalje kritiziral Komisijo, da ni upoštevala nesodelovanja drugega južnoafriškega proizvajalca in da dejstvo, da njegova družba ni izvažala v preteklosti, ne pomeni, da ne bo izvažala v prihodnosti.
In this respect it is noted that over the period considered this company did not export to the Union.
Glede tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da v obravnavanem obdobju ta družba ni izvažala v Unijo.
Anti-dumping measures do not serve as an instrument to prohibit legitimate imports to the Union.
Protidampinški ukrepi ne služijo kot instrument za prepoved zakonitega uvoza v Unijo.
This claim thus had to be rejected.
To trditev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
UNION PRODUCTION AND UNION INDUSTRY
PROIZVODNJA UNIJE IN INDUSTRIJA UNIJE
Within the Union, SWR are manufactured by over 25 producers/producer groups, which constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Znotraj Unije JŽV proizvaja več kot 25 proizvajalcev/skupin proizvajalcev, ki sestavljajo industrijo Unije v smislu člena 4(1) in člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
As indicated under recital (10), a sample consisting of 3 producers/producer groups companies was selected out of the following 20 Union producers which submitted the required information:
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10, je bil izbran vzorec, ki je zajemal tri proizvajalce/skupne družbe proizvajalcev od naslednjih 20 proizvajalcev Unije, ki so predložili zahtevane informacije:
BRIDON Group composed of Bridon International Ltd (United Kingdom) and Bridon International GmbH (Germany),
BRIDON Group, sestavljena iz Bridon International Ltd (Velika Britanija) in Bridon International GmbH (Nemčija),
Pfeifer Drako Drahtseilwerk GmbH (Germany),
Pfeifer Drako Drahtseilwerk GMBH (Nemčija),
Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH (Germany),
Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH (Nemčija),
Teufelberger Seil GmbH (Germany),
Teufelberger Seil GmbH (Nemčija),
Leventeris SA (Greece),
Leventeris SA (Grčija),
Metizi JSC (Bulgaria),
Metizi JSC (Bolgarija),
Arcelor Mittal Wire France (France),
Arcelor Mittal Wire France (Francija),
Brunton Shaw UK Limited (United Kingdom),
Brunton Shaw UK Limited (Velika Britanija),
Sirme Si Cabluri S.A./CORD S.A. (Romania),
Sirme Si Cabluri S.A. / CORD S.A. (Romunija),
Redaelli Tecna SpA (Italy),
Redaelli Tecna Spa (Italija),
Remer SRL (Italy),
Remer SRL (Italija),
Metal Press SRL (Italy),
Metal Press SRL (Italija),
Randers Reb International A/S (Denmark).
Randers Reb International A/S (Danska).
It is noted that the 3 sampled Union producers accounted for 40 % of the total Union production during the RIP, whilst the above 20 Union producers accounted for 96 % of the total Union production during the RIP which is considered to be representative of the entire Union production.
Opozoriti je treba, da so trije vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije predstavljali 40 % celotne proizvodnje Unije v OPP, navedenih 20 proizvajalcev pa je predstavljalo 96 % celotne proizvodnje Unije v OPP, kar se šteje za reprezentativno za celotno proizvodnjo Unije.
Union consumption was established on the basis of the sales volumes of the UI on the Union market, and Eurostat data for all EU imports.
Potrošnja Unije je bila določena na podlagi obsega prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije in Eurostatovih podatkov o celotnem uvozu EU.