natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It follows that for importers and the Union producers, it is important to collect information from a range of companies active in, for example, different product segments.
Iz tega sledi, da je pri uvoznikih in proizvajalcih Unije pomembno zbirati informacije iz najrazličnejših podjetij, ki so na primer dejavna v različnih segmentih izdelkov.
As the underlying rationale for selecting companies to be included in the samples is different for, on the one hand, Union producers and importers and, on the other hand, exporting producers, they are not in a similar situation.
Ker se temeljno načelo za izbor družb za vključitev v vzorec pri proizvajalcih Unije in uvoznikih na eni strani ter proizvajalcih izvoznikih na drugi strani razlikuje, niso v enakem položaju.
Therefore, neither the principle of non-discrimination nor equal treatment requires the use of an identical methodology for selecting the respective samples.
Zato niti načelo nediskriminacije niti načelo enake obravnave ne zahtevata uporabe enake metodologije pri izboru posameznih vzorcev.
It follows that this claim is wholly unwarranted and is therefore rejected.
Iz tega sledi, da je ta trditev v celoti neutemeljena in se zato zavrne.
Furthermore, one exporting producer maintained its request, as referred to in recital (8) of the provisional Regulation, that it should have been included in the sample.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik vztrajal pri svoji zahtevi, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (8) začasne uredbe, da se ga vključi v vzorec.
The company has however not put forward any new arguments that would justify its inclusion in the sample.
Vendar ta družba ni predložila nobenih novih razlogov, ki bi to upravičili.
Therefore, and taking into account the findings in recital (10) above, the conclusions in recital (9) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se ob upoštevanju ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave (10) zgoraj sklepi iz uvodne izjave (9) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The same non-sampled exporting producer claimed that it was not afforded sufficient time to submit its comments on the final disclosure and that, in addition, the disclosure was insufficient since it did not disclose, e.g. figures for allowances, sales prices, adjustments, etc. Therefore, its rights of defence have not been respected.
Isti nevzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da ni imel na voljo dovolj časa za predložitev pripomb na dokončno razkritje in da razkritje ni bilo ustrezno, saj niso bili razkriti npr. podatki o kvotah, prodajnih cenah in prilagoditvah. Zato njegova pravica do obrambe ni bila spoštovana.
According to Article 20(5) of the basic Regulation an interested party should be afforded a time period of at least 10 days to submit comments on the final disclosure.
V skladu s členom 20(5) osnovne uredbe bi morala imeti zainteresirana stran za predložitev pripomb na dokončno razkritje na voljo najmanj 10 dni.
The exporting producer in question received the final disclosure by way of electronic mail on 25 February 2013 and was given until 8 March 2013, i.e. 11 days, to submit comments.
Zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik je dokončno razkritje prejel po elektronski pošti 25. februarja 2013 in je imel za predložitev pripomb čas do 8. marca 2013, tj. 11 dni.
The disclosure document was, in addition, also sent by registered mail the following day.
Dokument o razkritju je bil naslednji dan poslan tudi s priporočeno pošto.
It follows that the party concerned was given sufficient time to submit comments and this claim must therefore be rejected.
To pomeni, da je imela zadevna stran na voljo dovolj časa za predložitev pripomb, zato je treba to trditev zavrniti.
In this respect it is also noted that the party's comments were provided within the given deadline and that no request for an extension of the deadline was made.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja tudi, da je stran pripombe predložila v predpisanem roku in ni zahtevala podaljšanja.
Moreover, having due regard to its obligation to protect confidential information, the Commission disclosed all essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to propose the imposition of definitive measures.
Poleg tega je Komisija ob upoštevanju obveznosti varovanja zaupnih podatkov razkrila vsa bistvena dejstva in premisleke, na podlagi katerih je nameravala priporočiti uvedbo dokončnih ukrepov.
More particularly, the respect for the rights of defence does not require that company specific sale figures or allowances made in respect of companies included in the sample, used to establish individual dumping margins must be communicated to a party for which no individual margin is calculated.
Nenazadnje pa spoštovanje pravice do obrambe ne zahteva, da je treba strani, za katero individualna stopnja ni bila določena, sporočiti podatke o prodaji posameznih družb ali kvot v zvezi z družbami, vključenimi v vzorec, ki so bili uporabljeni za določitev individualne stopnje dampinga.
It follows from the above that the claim that the rights of defence were not respected is unfounded and is therefore rejected.
Iz navedenega sledi, da je trditev, da pravica do obrambe ni bila spoštovana, neutemeljena in se zato zavrne.
As set out in recitals (24) and recitals (56) to (57) of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned as provisionally defined is ceramic tableware and kitchenware, excluding ceramic knives (‘the product concerned’), currently falling within CN codes ex69111000, ex69120010, ex69120030, ex69120050 and ex69120090 and originating in the PRC.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (24), (56) in (57) začasne uredbe, je zadevni izdelek, kakor je bil začasno opredeljen, keramična namizna in kuhinjska posoda razen keramičnih nožev („zadevni izdelek“), trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex69111000, ex69120010, ex69120030, ex69120050 in ex69120090 ter s poreklom izLRK.
Following provisional disclosure, no parties contested that ceramic (kitchen) knives were fundamentally different from other kinds of ceramic table and kitchenware due to differences in physical characteristics, production processes and end-uses.
Po začasnem razkritju ni nobena stran izpodbijala dejstva, da se keramični (kuhinjski) noži bistveno razlikujejo od drugih vrst keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode zaradi razlik v fizikalnih značilnostih, proizvodnih postopkih in končni uporabi.
All comments by parties having been analysed, the claim to exclude ceramic knives from the product scope of this investigation is definitively accepted.
Po analizi vseh pripomb strani se trditev o izključitvi keramičnih nožev iz obsega izdelkov te preiskave dokončno sprejme.
After publication of provisional measures, several parties claimed that certain ceramic condiment and spice mills and their ceramic grinding parts, should be excluded from the product scope.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov je več strani trdilo, da bi bilo nekatere keramične mlinčke za začimbe in zelišča ter njihove keramične drobilne dele treba izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
This claim is based on the allegation that, in view of their specificities, such mills and other types of ceramic tableware and kitchenware could not be considered as forming one single product.
Ta zahtevek temelji na trditvi, da glede na njihove posebne lastnosti takih mlinčkov ter drugih vrst keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode ni mogoče šteti za en sam izdelek.
Those mills have a ceramic material mainly made of alumina for the grinding plate which is not used for ‘standard’ tableware such as cups and plates and for which firing is done at higher temperatures.
Keramični material, iz katerega je pri navedenih mlinčkih izdelana drobilna ploščica, je sestavljen pretežno iz aluminijeva oksida, ki se za izdelavo „običajne“ namizne posode, kot so skodelice in krožniki, ne uporablja, poleg tega ga je treba žgati pri višji temperaturi.
Their degree of inter-changeability with the main categories of the product under investigation would be limited.
Njihova stopnja zamenljivosti z glavnimi kategorijami izdelka v preiskavi bi bila omejena.
This would also apply to ceramic grinding mechanisms without any housing which are normally declared under the above-mentioned codes.
To bi veljalo tudi za keramične drobilne mehanizme brez ohišja, ki so navadno uvrščeni pod zgoraj navedenimi oznakami.
The investigation showed that the ceramic element in these grinders normally represented a minor part of the mill. Moreover, the investigation showed that mills with a ceramic grinding plate, including their ceramic grinding parts, did not have the same basic physical characteristics and basic uses as ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Preiskava je pokazala, da keramični element običajno predstavlja le manjši del mlinčka. Pokazala je tudi, da mlinčki s keramično drobilno ploščico, vključno s keramičnimi drobilnimi deli, nimajo enakih osnovnih fizikalnih značilnosti in enake osnovne uporabe kot keramična namizna in kuhinjska posoda.
The shape, strength and design of the ceramic grinding parts are different from ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Oblika, trdnost in zasnova keramičnih drobilnih delov so drugačne kot pri keramični namizni in kuhinjski posodi.
Some parties submitted that the mills in question should be excluded from the product scope on the basis that they have the same physical characteristics, industry design and end-use as mills with grinding mechanisms made of metal and that when included in certain sets of mills they are normally classified under tariff heading 8210.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da bi bilo treba zadevne mlinčke izključiti iz obsega izdelka, ker imajo enake fizikalne značilnosti, industrijsko zasnovo in končno uporabo kot mlinčki s kovinskimi drobilnimi mehanizmi ter ker so, če so vključeni v nekatere garniture mlinčkov, običajno uvrščeni pod tarifno številko 8210.
They also claimed that the ceramic elements in these instances generally represent normally up to 2 % of the value of the product.
Trdile so tudi, da v teh primerih keramični elementi običajno predstavljajo največ 2 % vrednosti izdelka.
Nevertheless, given the numerous classification possibilities of mills and sets of mills, the investigation could not retain these arguments to determine whether ceramic mills should be excluded from the product scope of the investigation.
Kljub temu pa glede na številne možnosti razvrstitve mlinčkov in garnitur mlinčkov teh trditev pri odločitvi, ali bi bilo treba keramične mlinčke izključiti iz obsega izdelka v preiskavi, med preiskavo ni bilo mogoče upoštevati.
Several parties backed their claim that the mills in question should be excluded from the product scope on the basis that it would be necessary to use ceramic grinding plates, rather than metal, in certain mills, namely salt mills, as salt corrodes metal grinders.
Več strani je svoj zahtevek, da bi bilo treba zadevne mlinčke izključiti iz obsega izdelka, utemeljilo z navedbo, da bi bilo treba v nekaterih mlinčkih, zlasti v mlinčkih za sol, namesto kovinskih uporabiti keramične drobilne ploščice, ker sol povzroča korozijo kovinskih drobilnih delov.
However, the investigation showed that salt mills do not necessarily use ceramic grinding mechanisms.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da se v mlinčkih za sol ne uporabljajo vedno keramični drobilni mehanizmi.
On the basis of the considerations in the recitals above, the investigation concluded that condiment and spice mills with ceramic grinding elements are fundamentally different from other kinds of ceramic table and kitchenware due to the differences in basic physical characteristics and uses of the ceramic material used for the working parts.
Na podlagi ugotovitev v zgornjih uvodnih izjavah je preiskava pokazala, da se mlinčki za začimbe s keramičnimi drobilnimi elementi bistveno razlikujejo od drugih vrst keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode zaradi drugačnih osnovnih fizikalnih značilnosti in uporabe keramičnega materiala, ki se uporablja za delovne dele.
Therefore, the claim to exclude them, including stand-alone ceramic grinding mechanisms and their parts, from the product scope of this investigation is accepted.
Zahtevek, da se ti mlinčki, vključno s samostojnimi keramičnimi drobilnimi mehanizmi in njihovimi deli, izključijo iz obsega izdelka te preiskave, se zato sprejme.
After the publication of provisional measures, some parties claimed that ceramic knife sharpeners should be excluded from the product scope because of differences in the production processes, end-use and the fact that these items are not aimed at retaining foodstuff due to their specific design and physical characteristics.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov so nekatere strani trdile, da bi bilo treba keramične brusilce nožev izključiti iz obsega izdelka zaradi drugačnih proizvodnih postopkov in drugačne končne uporabe ter ker se zaradi posebne zasnove in fizikalnih značilnosti ti izdelki ne uporabljajo za shranjevanje živil.
The investigation confirmed these points.
Pri preiskavi so bile te trditve potrjene.
The claim to exclude them from the product scope of this investigation is therefore granted.
Zato se zahtevek za izključitev teh izdelkov iz obsega izdelka te preiskave sprejme.
In the same vein it was also investigated whether ceramic peelers should be excluded from the product scope.
V preiskavi je bilo nadalje preučeno, ali bi bilo treba iz obsega izdelka izključiti keramične lupilce.
Indeed, the investigation confirmed that ceramic peelers, also, are fundamentally different from other kinds of ceramic table and kitchenware due to the differences in the design and physical characteristics (shape and strength) of the ceramic material used for the working parts, their production processes and end-use.
Preiskava je potrdila, da se tudi keramični lupilci bistveno razlikujejo od drugih vrst keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode zaradi drugačne zasnove in drugačnih fizikalnih značilnosti (oblika in trdnost) keramičnega materiala, ki se uporablja za delovne dele, ter drugačnih proizvodnih postopkov in končne uporabe.
Ceramic peelers should, therefore, also be excluded from the product scope of this investigation.
Keramične lupilce je zato treba prav tako izključiti iz obsega izdelka te preiskave.
After the publication of provisional measures, a party also claimed that pizza-stones made of cordierite ceramic should be excluded from the product scope because of their different physical properties (shape and hardness), industrial design and use.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov je ena od strani tudi trdila, da bi morali biti kamni za peko pice iz kordieritne keramike izključeni iz obsega izdelka zaradi njihovih drugačnih fizikalnih lastnosti (oblika in trdnost), industrijske zasnove in uporabe.
Cordierite ceramic is a type of alumina magnesia silicate with specific properties, namely an excellent thermal shock resistance.
Kordieritna keramika je vrsta aluminijevega magnezijevega silikata s specifičnimi lastnostmi, kot je odlična odpornost na temperaturne spremembe.
The investigation confirmed that pizza-stones made of cordierite ceramic have the same physical properties (shape and hardness), industrial design and use as bricks for furnaces or ovens.
Preiskava je potrdila, da imajo kamni za peko pice iz kordieritne keramike enake fizikalne lastnosti (oblika in trdnost), industrijsko zasnovo in uporabo kot opeke za peči ali pečice.
Consequently, they are different from other ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Zato se razlikujejo od druge keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode.
Following final disclosure, the complainants pointed at the similarity of pizza-stones made of cordierite ceramic as compared to the other products covered by the proceeding.
Po dokončnem razkritju so pritožniki opozorili na podobnost kamnov za peko pice iz kordieritne keramike in drugih izdelkov, ki jih zajema postopek.
However, they could not demonstrate that pizza-stones made of cordierite ceramic have the same basic physical characteristics and end uses.
Vendar niso mogli dokazati, da imajo kamni za peko pice iz kordieritne keramike enake osnovne fizikalne značilnosti in končno uporabo.
After the publication of provisional measures, a Dutch association claimed that ceramic tableware and kitchenware to be used as promotional products should be excluded from the product scope on the basis that they are not sold to be used as tableware or kitchenware, that they are an important economical driver for the retail sector, that they are highly appreciated by consumers and that only producers in the PRC could offer the quantities needed within a short period.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov je nizozemsko združenje trdilo, da bi bilo treba keramično namizno in kuhinjsko posodo, ki se uporablja kot promocijski izdelki, izključiti iz obsega izdelka, ker se ne prodaja, da bi se uporabljala kot namizna in kuhinjska posoda, ker je pomemben gospodarski dejavnik v sektorju trgovine na drobno, ker jo potrošniki visoko cenijo in bi lahko le proizvajalci iz LRKzagotovili potrebne količine v kratkem času.
The claim to exclude ceramic tableware and kitchenware to be used as promotional products from the product scope of this investigation cannot however be granted because their physical characteristics, production processes and end-use are the same as those of other kinds of ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Vendar zahtevek za izključitev keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode, ki se uporablja kot promocijski izdelki, iz obsega izdelkov te preiskave ne more biti odobren, ker so njene fizikalne značilnosti, proizvodni postopki in končna uporaba enaki kot pri drugih vrstah keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode.
After the publication of provisional measures and again after final disclosure, a German importer and wholesaler and a Chinese co-operating exporting producer claimed that specially coated stoneware products of a kind for sublimation printing and for which the coating of sublimation is removable through mechanical scratching should be excluded from the product scope on the basis that they are semi-finished products for which the photofinishing is carried out in the Union via specific channels, the different consumer perception, the fact that the sublimation coating exceeds the value of the uncoated ceramic items and the inexistency of Union producers of this kind of product.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov in ponovno po dokončnem razkritju sta nemški uvoznik in trgovec na debelo ter sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik trdila, da bi bilo treba izdelke iz kamenine s posebnim premazom, namenjene za sublimacijski tisk, pri katerih se sublimacijski premaz lahko mehansko odstrani, izključiti iz obsega izdelka, ker gre za polizdelke, pri katerih se tiskanje fotografij prek posebnih kanalov opravi v Uniji, ker jih potrošniki drugače dojemajo, ker vrednost sublimacijskega premaza presega vrednost nepremazanih keramičnih izdelkov in ker v Uniji proizvajalcev tovrstnih izdelkov ni.
The investigation revealed that the product is visibly identical to other non-sublimated tableware and, therefore, it is difficult to distinguish between them, if at all.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je izdelek po videzu enak drugi namizni posodi brez sublimacijskega premaza in ga je zato od nje težko ali celo nemogoče razlikovati.
The investigation further showed that these products normally have the same end-use as other types of ceramic tableware.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da imajo ti izdelki običajno enako končno uporabo kot druge vrste keramične namizne posode.
It was also found that several Union producers manufacture these products and that Union-made and imported products are in direct competition.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da te izdelke izdeluje več proizvajalcev Unije ter da izdelki, proizvedeni v Uniji, uvoženim izdelkom neposredno konkurirajo.
In view of the above, the claim to exclude specially coated stoneware wares of a kind for sublimation printing is rejected.
Glede na navedeno se zahtevek, da se izdelki iz kamenine s posebnim premazom, namenjeni za sublimacijski tisk, zavrne.
After the publication of provisional measures and again after final disclosure, the importer that had claimed the exclusion of underglaze figurative hand-painted tableware from the product scope alleged that the Commission's provisional analysis in this respect was flawed because it ignored the existence of market segments, the differences in quality between the different types of tableware, the luxury and more fragile nature of underglaze figurative hand-painted tableware and the limited interchangeability as a consequence of the associated consumer perception.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov in ponovno po dokončnem razkritju je uvoznik, ki je zahteval izključitev namizne posode z ročno figurativno podglazurno poslikavo iz obsega izdelka, trdil, da je bila začasna analiza Komisije v zvezi s tem pomanjkljiva, ker ni upoštevala obstoja tržnih segmentov, razlik v kakovosti med različnimi vrstami namizne posode, luksuznosti in krhkosti namizne posode z ročno figurativno podglazurno poslikavo in omejene zamenljivosti zaradi povezanega dojemanja potrošnikov.
It also alleged that underglaze figurative hand-painted tableware may be even used for decoration.
Trdil je tudi, da se namizna posoda z ročno figurativno podglazurno poslikavo lahko uporablja tudi kot okras.
As regards the claims concerning the differences in quality between the different types of tableware and the luxury and more fragile nature of underglaze figurative hand-painted tableware, these characteristics are not specific to underglaze figurative hand-painted tableware.
V zvezi s trditvami glede razlik v kakovosti med različnimi vrstami namizne posode ter luksuznostjo in krhkostjo namizne posode z ročno figurativno podglazurno poslikavo, te lastnosti niso značilne izključno za namizne posode z ročno figurativno podglazurno poslikavo.
Moreover, as regards the limited interchangeability as a consequence of associated consumer perception, no new argument was raised that would change the conclusion in recital (45) of the provisional Regulation that the average consumer does not make a difference between underglaze figurative hand-painted tableware and other types of ceramic tableware.
Kar pa zadeva omejeno zamenljivost zaradi povezanega dojemanja potrošnikov, ni bil predstavljen noben nov argument, ki bi spremenil ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave (45) začasne uredbe, da povprečni potrošnik ne razlikuje med namizno posodo z ročno figurativno podglazurno poslikavo in drugimi vrstami namizne posode.
Finally, the Commission had analysed the existence of market segments in recitals (157) to (158) of the provisional Regulation.
Poleg tega je Komisija preučila obstoj tržnih segmentov v uvodnih izjavah (157) in (158) začasne uredbe.
These arguments could not therefore reverse the conclusions in recital (45) of the provisional Regulation.
Ti argumenti zato ne spreminjajo ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave (45) začasne uredbe.
The claim raised in recital (50) of the provisional Regulation was further elaborated after the imposition of provisional measures.
Zahtevek iz uvodne izjave (50) začasne uredbe je bil po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov podrobneje obrazložen.
These claims were reiterated after definitive disclosure.
Te trditve so bile po dokončnem razkritju ponovljene.
The importer with production in PRC claimed that kitchenware/tableware products that are entirely glazed and/or enamelled on 100 % of their surface with the exception of the base or a part thereof and where 100 % of the glazed/enamelled surface is coloured with a non-white colour should be excluded from the product scope.
Uvoznik s proizvodnjo v LRK je trdil, da bi bilo treba kuhinjsko/namizno posodo, ki je v celoti glazirana in/ali emajlirana na 100 % površine razen spodnje strani posode ali njenega dela ter pri kateri je 100 % glazirane/emajlirane površine pobarvane z nebelo barvo, izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
The claim was duly analysed and the investigation has shown that the physical characteristics, production processes and end-uses of these products are the same as those of other glazed and/or enamelled products of ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Trditev je bila ustrezno preučena in preiskava je pokazala, da so fizikalne lastnosti, proizvodni postopki in končna uporaba teh izdelkov enaki kot pri drugi glazirani in/ali emajlirani keramični namizni in kuhinjski posodi.
Therefore, the claim is definitively rejected.
Trditev se zato dokončno zavrne.