natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subsequently, CJSC Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube has been discontinued as a legal entity and all its property and non-property rights and liabilities was taken over by LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, which was established in December 2007.
Pozneje je CJSC Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube prenehala delovati kot pravna oseba in vse njene lastninske in nelastninske pravice ter obveznosti je prevzela LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, ki je bila ustanovljena decembra 2007.
On 28 June 2011, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union the initiation of an expiry review (‘Notice of initiation’) [13] of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Croatia, Russia and Ukraine pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 28. junija 2011 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka („obvestilo o začetku“) [13] protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Hrvaške, Rusije in Ukrajine v skladu členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The review was initiated following a substantiated request lodged on 29 March 2011 by the Defence Committee of the Seamless Steel Tubes Industry of the European Union (‘the applicant’) on behalf of Union producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Union production of certain seamless pipes and tubes.
Pregled se je začel po utemeljenem zahtevku, ki ga je 29. marca 2011 vložil Zaščitni odbor industrije brezšivnih jeklenih cevi Evropske unije („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo večinski delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % skupne proizvodnje nekaterih brezšivnih cevi v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union Industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka ukrepov damping in škoda za industrijo Unije verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovila.
Further to the expiry review mentioned above, the Commission has, in parallel, initiated two partial reviews pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Ukraine and Russia [14].
Komisija je vzporedno poleg navedenega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa začela dva delna pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Ukrajine in Rusije [14].
These partial reviews were requested by one group of exporting producers in Ukraine, the Interpipe group, and one group of exporting producers in Russia, the TMK group, respectively.
Ta delna pregleda je zahtevala skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Ukrajine (skupina Interpipe) oziroma skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Rusije (skupina TMK).
Both reviews are limited in scope to the examination of dumping only as far as the applicants are concerned.
Pregleda sta, kar zadeva vložnika, po obsegu omejena samo na proučitev dampinga.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers, known users, the representatives of the exporting countries, the applicant and the Union producers mentioned in the request of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, znane uporabnike, predstavnike držav izvoznic, vložnika in proizvajalce Unije, navedene v zahtevku za začetek pregleda.
In view of the large number of exporting producers in Russia and Ukraine, of Union producers and of importers involved in the investigation, sampling was initially envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji in Ukrajini, proizvajalcev Unije in uvoznikov, vključenih v preiskavo, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be indeed necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above parties were requested, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the proceeding and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bile navedene strani pozvane, da se v 15 dneh po začetku postopka javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo zahtevane informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
Given that only one exporting producer in Russia and only one exporting producer in Ukraine provided the information requested in the notice of initiation and expressed their willingness to further cooperate with the Commission, it was decided not to apply sampling in the case of the exporting producers in Russia and Ukraine, but to send a questionnaire to those producers.
Ker je informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku, predložil le en proizvajalec izvoznik v Rusiji in le en proizvajalec izvoznik v Ukrajini, ki sta izrazila tudi pripravljenost za nadaljnje sodelovanje s Komisijo, je bilo odločeno, da se vzorčenje v primeru proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji in Ukrajini ne uporabi in se navedenima proizvajalcema pošlje vprašalnik.
Thereafter, the exporting producer in Russia which provided the information requested in the notice of initiation decided not to cooperate further, by sending a reply to the questionnaire intended for the exporting producer in Russia.
Pozneje se je ruski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je predložil informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku, odločil, da bo prekinil nadaljnje sodelovanje in ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika, ki mu je bil poslan.
Nineteen Union producers provided the information requested for the selection of a sample and expressed their willingness to cooperate with the Commission.
Devetnajst proizvajalcev Unije je predložilo informacije, zahtevane za izbor vzorca, in izrazilo pripravljenost za sodelovanje s Komisijo.
On the basis of the information received from the Union producers, the Commission had, prior to the initiation, provisionally selected a sample of four producers, which were found to be representative of the Union industry in terms of volume of production and sales of the like product in the Union.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci Unije, je Komisija pred začetkom postopka začasno izbrala vzorec štirih proizvajalcev, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da predstavljajo industrijo Unije glede na obseg proizvodnje in prodaje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
Following comments received on the appropriateness of this choice within the deadline of 15 days after the initiation, the Commission replaced one of the provisionally selected producers by another producer.
Komisija je po prejetju pripomb o ustreznosti te izbire v 15 dneh po začetku postopka nadomestila enega od začasno izbranih proizvajalcev z drugim proizvajalcem.
Four importers provided the information requested in the notice of initiation and expressed their willingness to cooperate with the Commission.
Štirje uvozniki so predložili informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku, in izrazili pripravljenost za sodelovanje s Komisijo.
Therefore the Commission decided not to apply sampling and to send a questionnaire to those importers instead.
Komisija se je zato odločila, da ne uporabi vzorčenja in je navedenim uvoznikom raje poslala vprašalnik.
Questionnaires were therefore sent to the four sampled Union producers, to four importers and to all exporting producers in the three countries concerned that came forward.
Vprašalniki so bili zato poslani štirim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, štirim uvoznikom in vsem proizvajalcem izvoznikom v zadevnih treh državah, ki so se javili.
All exporting producers in Russia failed to submit a reply to the questionnaire.
Noben proizvajalec izvoznik iz Rusije ni poslal izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
It is therefore considered that no exporting producer in Russia cooperated in the investigation.
Zato se šteje, da v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben proizvajalec izvoznik iz Rusije.
One group of exporting producers in Ukraine submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
Ena skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Ukrajini je predložila izpolnjen vprašalnik.
One exporting producer in Croatia submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
En proizvajalec izvoznik iz Hrvaške je predložil izpolnjen vprašalnik.
Replies to the questionnaires were further received from the four sampled Union producers, three importers and one user.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali tudi štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, trije uvozniki in en uporabnik.
Arcelor Mittal Tubular products Ostrava, Czech Republic,
Arcelor Mittal Tubular Products Ostrava, Češka,
Tenaris Dalmine SpA, Bergamo, Italy, and its related company TGS UK, Aberdeen, UK,
Tenaris Dalmine S.p.A., Bergamo, Italija, in povezana družba TGS UK, Aberdeen, Združeno kraljestvo,
Tubos Reunidos SA, Amurrio, Spain, and its related company Almesa, Barcelona, Spain,
Tubos Reunidos S.A., Amurrio, Španija, in povezana družba Almesa, Barcelona, Španija,
V & M Deutschland GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany;
V & M Deutschland GmbH, Düsseldorf, Nemčija;
Exporting producer in Croatia:
proizvajalec izvoznik iz Hrvaške:
Exporting producer in Ukraine:
proizvajalec izvoznik v Ukrajini:
The Interpipe Group (OJSC Interpipe NTRP, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, Nikopol, Ukraine) and their related trading companies LLC Interpipe Ukraine, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine and Interpipe Europe SA, Lugano, Switzerland);
The Interpipe Group (OJSC Interpipe NTRP, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukrajina, LLC Interpipe Niko Tube, Nikopol, Ukrajina) ter povezane družbe LLC Interpipe Ukrajina, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukrajina, in Interpipe Europe SA, Lugano, Švica;
Importers/users:
uvozniki/uporabniki:
Castellan Maria & C SPS, San Dona di Piave, Italy,
Castellan Maria & C s.p.s., San Dona di Piave, Italija,
TAL Group, Siderpighi, Pontenure, Piacenza, Italy.
TAL Group, Siderpighi, Pontenure, Piacenza, Italija.
The investigation regarding the continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava glede nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajemala obdobje od 1. aprila 2010 do 31. marca 2011 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2008 up to the end of the RIP (‘period considered’).
Proučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2008 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is the same as that in the last investigation which led to the imposition of measures currently in force, i.e. certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel (SPT), of circular cross-section, of an external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm with a carbon equivalent value (CEV) not exceeding 0,86 according to the International Institute of Welding (IIW) formula and chemical analysis [15], originating in Croatia, Russia and Ukraine (‘the product concerned’), currently falling within CN codes ex73041100, ex73041910, ex73041930, ex73042200, ex73042300, ex73042400, ex73042910, ex73042930, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 and ex73045993.
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot v zadnji preiskavi, na podlagi katere so bili uvedeni trenutno veljavni ukrepi, tj. nekatere brezšivne cevi iz železa ali jekla s krožnim prečnim prerezom, z zunanjim premerom do vključno 406,4 mm in z ekvivalentom ogljika (CEV) do vključno 0,86 v skladu s formulo in kemično analizo Mednarodnega inštituta za varilstvo (IIW) [15], ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN 73041100, ex73041910, ex73041930, ex73042200, ex73042300, ex73042400, ex73042910, ex73042930, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 in ex73045993, s poreklom iz Hrvaške, Rusije in Ukrajine („zadevni izdelek“).
The product concerned is used in a wide variety of applications, like transport of gas and liquids, in the construction business for piling, for mechanical uses, gas tubes, boiler tubes as well as oil and country tubular goods (OCTG) for drilling, casing and tubing for the oil industry.
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja v različne namene, na primer za transport plina in tekočin, v gradbeništvu za pilote, za mehansko uporabo, za plinovode, toplotne cevi ter cevi, znane kot cevi OCTG („oil country tubular goods“), ki se v naftni industriji uporabljajo kot vrtalne, zaščitne in proizvodne cevi.
SPT take very different forms at the time of their delivery to the users.
Ob dobavi uporabnikom so brezšivne cevi zelo različnih oblik.
They can be e.g. galvanised, threaded, delivered as green tubes (i.e. without any heat treatment), with special ends, different cross-sections, cut to size or not.
Cevi so lahko pocinkane, navojne, dobavljene kot „green tubes“ (tj. niso toplotno obdelane), s posebnim zaključkom, z različnimi krožnimi prečnimi prerezi, razrezane ali nerazrezane.
There are no generalised standard sizes for the tubes, which explains why most of the SPT are made upon customers’ orders.
Ni splošnih standardnih velikosti cevi, zato je večina brezšivnih cevi izdelana po naročilu.
SPT are normally connected by welding.
Brezšivne cevi so običajno zvarjene.
The investigation showed that all SPT share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vse brezšivne cevi enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter osnovno uporabo.
As established in previous as well as in the latest investigation, this expiry review investigation confirmed that the product exported to the Union from Croatia, Russia and Ukraine, the product produced and sold on the domestic markets of Croatia, Russia and Ukraine, and the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union producers have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and end uses and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa je potrdila, da imajo, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prejšnjih in tudi zadnji preiskavi, izdelek, izvožen v Unijo iz Hrvaške, Rusije in Ukrajine, izdelek, proizveden in prodan na domačih trgih Hrvaške, Rusije in Ukrajine, ter izdelek, ki ga proizvajajo in prodajajo v Uniji proizvajalci Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter končne uporabe in se zato štejejo za podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
During the RIP, the total import volume, as recorded in Eurostat, of SPT from Croatia, Russia and Ukraine amounted to 42723 tonnes, representing 2,5 % of the Union market share.
Po Eurostatovih podatkih je v OPP celoten obseg uvoza brezšivnih cevi iz Hrvaške, Rusije in Ukrajine znašal 42723 ton, kar predstavlja 2,5 % tržnega deleža Unije.
In accordance with Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation, the same methodology was used as in the latest investigation, whenever circumstances have not changed or whenever the information was available.
V skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe se je, kadar se okoliščine niso spremenile ali kadar so bile informacije na voljo, uporabljala enaka metodologija kot v zadnji preiskavi.
In case of non-cooperation, such as in the case of Russia, use had to be made of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
V primeru nesodelovanja, na primer za Rusijo, so se uporabljala razpoložljiva dejstva v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
As far as Croatia and Ukraine are concerned, information made available by the cooperating companies as well as publicly available information were used.
V zvezi s Hrvaško in Ukrajino so se uporabile informacije, ki so jih predložile sodelujoče družbe, in javno dostopne informacije.
The general methodology set out hereafter has been applied to all cooperating producers in Croatia and in Ukraine.
Spodaj opredeljena splošna metodologija je bila uporabljena pri vseh sodelujočih proizvajalcih v Hrvaški in Ukrajini.
The presentation of the findings on dumping for each of the countries concerned therefore only describes what is specific for each exporting country.
Zato predstavitev ugotovitev dampinga za zadevne države opisuje samo, kaj je značilno za vsako državo izvoznico.
With regard to Russia, in the absence of cooperation from either of the existing Russian exporting producers the overall analysis, including the dumping calculation, is based on the best facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja obstoječih ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov temelji splošna analiza za Rusijo, vključno z izračunom dampinga, na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation it was first examined for each cooperating producer whether its total volume of domestic sales of the like product to independent customers was representative in comparison with its total volume of export sales to the Union, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the product concerned to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se je najprej za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca proučilo, ali je bil celoten obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam reprezentativen v primerjavi s celotnim obsegom izvoza v Unijo, tj. ali je celoten obseg take prodaje predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered sufficiently representative when the total volume of that product type sold by the exporting producer on the domestic market to independent customers during the RIP represented at least 5 % of its total sales volume of the comparable product type exported to the Union.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg navedene vrste izdelka proizvajalca izvoznika, prodanega neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OPP, pomenil vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste izdelka, izvoženega v Unijo.
It was also examined whether the domestic sales of each product type could be regarded as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Proučeno je bilo tudi, ali se za domačo prodajo posamezne vrste izdelka lahko šteje, da je bila opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of domestic sales to independent customers on the domestic market which were profitable for each exported type of the product concerned during the RIP.
To je bilo izvedeno tako, da se je pri vsaki izvoženi vrsti izdelka določil delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OPP.
For those product types where more than 80 % by volume of sales on the domestic market of the product type were above cost and the weighted average sales price of that type was equal to or above the unit cost of production, normal value, by product type, was calculated as the weighted average of the actual domestic prices of all sales of the type in question, irrespective of whether those sales were profitable or not.
Za tiste vrste izdelkov, pri katerih je bilo več kot 80 % obsega prodaje vrste izdelka na domačem trgu prodanih po ceni, višji od stroškov na enoto, in pri katerih je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena navedene vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto, je bila normalna vrednost po vrsti izdelka izračunana kot tehtano povprečje dejanskih domačih cen celotne prodaje zadevne vrste, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the unit cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, which was calculated as a weighted average price of only the profitable domestic sales of that type made during the RIP.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka pomenil 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste ali kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste nižja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtana povprečna cena zgolj dobičkonosne domače prodaje navedene vrste v OPP.
Wherever there were no domestic sales of a particular product type and for product types where the domestic sales were insufficient, the normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar koli ni bilo domače prodaje posebne vrste izdelka in kadar domača prodaja posameznih vrst izdelka ni bila zadostna, se je normalna vrednost izračunala v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
When constructing normal value pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, the amounts for selling, general and administrative costs and for profits have been based, pursuant to Article 2(6), introductory phrase, of the basic Regulation, on the actual data pertaining to the production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product, by the exporting producer or on facts available.
Pri izračunu normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe so zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške ter za dobiček v skladu z uvodnim stavkom člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe temeljili na dejanskih podatkih za proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka proizvajalca izvoznika v običajnem poteku trgovine ali na razpoložljivih podatkih.
The normal value and the export price of the exporting producers of the cooperating group were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz sodelujoče skupine sta bili primerjani na podlagi franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so se v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevale razlike, ki vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Dumping margin for the cooperating exporting producers
Stopnja dampinga za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike
According to Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price per product type on an ex-works basis for each cooperating company.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe se je za vsako sodelujočo družbo tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno na podlagi franko tovarna.
During the RIP, the total import volume of SPT from CMC Sisak, which is the sole exporting producer of SPT in Croatia, represented less than 1 % of the total Union consumption.
V OPP je celotni obseg uvoza brezšivnih cevi družbe CMC Sisak, ki je edini proizvajalec izvoznik brezšivnih cevi v Hrvaški, predstavljal manj kot 1 % celotne potrošnje Unije.
The investigation established that while the domestic sales of the product concerned were representative in accordance with recitals 30 and 31 above, there were no sales in the ordinary course of trade.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bila domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka sicer reprezentativna v skladu z uvodnima izjavama 30 in 31, vendar se prodaja ni izvedla v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Accordingly, the normal value for the cooperating producer was constructed pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost za sodelujočega proizvajalca se je konstruirala v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.