natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With regard to imports from other third countries, their market share declined during the period considered from 7 % in 2008 to 6 % in the IP while those of Russia and Turkey increased.
V zvezi z uvozom iz drugih tretjih držav se je njihov tržni delež v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal s 7 % leta 2008 na 6 % v OP, medtem ko se je tržni delež Rusije in Turčije povečal.
The average prices of those imports were generally higher than the dumped imports from the countries concerned and close to the average prices of the Union producers and as such are considered not to break the causal link between injury to the Union industry and the increased dumped imports from Turkey and Russia.
Povprečne cene navedenega uvoza so bile na splošno višje od dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav in blizu povprečnih cen proizvajalcev Unije ter se zato ne šteje, da prekinjajo vzročno zvezo med škodo za industrijo Unije in povečanim dampinškim uvozom iz Turčije ter Rusije.
Consequently, the claim is rejected and the provisional conclusion that imports from third countries are not breaking the causal link is confirmed.
Zato se trditev zavrne in začasna ugotovitev, da uvoz iz tretjih držav ne prekinja vzročne zveze, se potrdi.
The Turkish Government also argued that any injury suffered by the Union industry would be caused by the increased cost of production resulting from contraction in demand.
Turška vlada je tudi trdila, da je bila škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, posledica povišanih proizvodnih stroškov, ki so posledica manjšega povpraševanja.
It is noted in this regard that, as already stated in recital 101 of the provisional Regulation, the financial and economic crisis of 2008/2009 is in all likelihood the reason behind the decreased consumption for pipe fittings.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je, kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 101 začasne uredbe, po vsej verjetnosti finančna in gospodarska kriza iz leta 2008/2009 razlog za zmanjšanje potrošnje pribora (fitingov) za cevi.
Consumption dropped by over 40 % between 2008 and 2009, and remained at that low level throughout the rest of the period considered (although slightly increasing in the IP).
Potrošnja se je med letoma 2008 in 2009 zmanjšala za več kot 40 % in je ostala na tako nizki ravni do konca obravnavanega obdobja (čeprav se je v OP malce povečala).
This obviously has had an important impact on the profitability of the Union industry.
To je seveda bistveno vplivalo na dobičkonosnost industrije Unije.
At the same time, any negative impact of higher unit manufacturing cost was clearly deepened by the fact that the prices of the Union industry were dropping subject to severe price pressure and significant undercutting by the dumped imports from Turkey and Russia.
Hkrati se je kakršen koli negativen učinek višjih proizvodnih stroškov na enoto še povečal zaradi dejstva, da so se cene industrije Unije nižale, saj so bile izpostavljene močnemu pritisku cen in znatnemu nelojalnemu nižanju cen dampinškega uvoza iz Turčije in Rusije.
In a normal market situation the Union industry should have a possibility of minimising the impact of any unit cost increase by at least keeping the normal price level, which was clearly not possible in the situation of price pressure exerted by artificially cheap dumped imports from the countries concerned.
V normalnih tržnih razmerah bi industrija Unije morala imeti možnost za zmanjšanje vpliva povečanja stroškov na enoto z ohranitvijo vsaj običajne cene, kar očitno ob izvajanju cenovnega pritiska zaradi umetno poceni dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav ni bilo mogoče.
Consequently, the claim is rejected and it is definitely concluded that any negative effect of contraction in demand is not such as to break the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports from Russia and Turkey.
Zato se trditev zavrne in se dokončno sklene, da kakršen koli negativni učinek zmanjšanja povpraševanja ni tolikšen, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in dampinškim uvozom iz Rusije in Turčije.
In the absence of any other claim or comments, the content of recitals 94 to 106 of the provisional Regulation, including the conclusion that the dumped imports from the countries concerned have caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih trditev ali pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 94 do 106 začasne uredbe, vključno z ugotovitvijo, da je dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe, potrdi.
Following the provisional disclosure, the ÇIB claimed that imposition of any measures would lead to a situation in which ERNE Fittings, a complainant would have a monopoly-like position in the Union market.
Po začasnem razkritju je združenje ÇIB trdilo, da bi uvedba kakršnih koli ukrepov privedla do stanja, v katerem bi imela družba ERNE Fittings, eden pritožnikov, monopolni položaj na trgu Unije.
It is noted in this regard that ERNE is only one of two complainants and that the second one — INTERFIT — is similar in size to ERNE.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je družba ERNE le eden od dveh pritožnikov in da je drugi – INTERFIT – podobne velikosti kot ERNE.
In addition, data in the provisional Regulation concerning the sampled Union producers also included a third Union producer — Virgilio CENA & Figli.
Poleg tega so podatki iz začasne uredbe v zvezi z vzorčenimi proizvajalci Unije vključevali tudi tretjega proizvajalca Unije – Virgilio CENA & Figli.
Moreover, there is a significant number of smaller companies in the Union producing and selling the product under investigation and there are significant imports from other sources.
Poleg tega obstaja v Uniji veliko število manjših podjetij, ki proizvajajo in prodajajo izdelek v preiskavi, ter znaten uvoz iz drugih virov.
Given the above, it is considered that there is no risk of monopolisation of ERNE’s position.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da ni tveganja za monopolizacijo položaja družbe ERNE.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals 107 to 117 of the provisional Regulation, including the conclusion that no compelling reasons exist against the imposition of measures on the dumped imports from the countries concerned are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 107 do 117 začasne uredbe, vključno z ugotovitvijo, da ne obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi proti uvedbi ukrepov na dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav, potrdijo.
G. DEFINITIVE MEASURES
G. DOKONČNI UKREPI
In the absence of any specific comments, the content of recitals 118 to 120 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 118 do 120 začasne uredbe potrdi.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9 of the basic Regulation, it is considered that a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of the product concerned originating in Russia and Turkey at the level of the lowest of the dumping margin and injury elimination level found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule, which is in all cases the dumping margin.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročnostjo in interesom Unije, ter v skladu s členom 9 osnovne uredbe se šteje, da je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije na ravni najnižje stopnje dampinga in odprave škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve, ki je v vsakem primeru stopnja dampinga.
For Russia, in the absence of cooperation by Russian exporting producers, a countrywide dumping margin was calculated as explained in recitals 21 to 31 of the provisional Regulation and that margin is hereby confirmed.
Zaradi nesodelovanja ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov se za Rusijo potrdi stopnja dampinga na ravni države, ki je bila izračunana, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 21 do 31 začasne uredbe.
For Turkey, given that the level of cooperation was considered to be relatively low, the residual dumping margin was based on a reasonable method leading to a margin which is higher than the highest among the individual margins of the three cooperating companies as explained in recital 49 of the provisional Regulation, and that residual dumping margin is hereby confirmed.
Za Turčijo se je raven sodelovanja štela za sorazmerno nizko, zato se potrdi preostala stopnja dampinga, ki temelji na ustrezni metodi, po kateri je stopnja višja od najvišje posamezne stopnje treh sodelujočih družb, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 49.
Definitive anti-dumping duty (%)
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev (%)
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to those companies.
Zato odražajo ugotovljeni položaj teh družb med preiskavo.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the countries concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatve (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki jih proizvedejo družbe in torej navedene posamezne pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and will be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Za uvožene izdelke, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni izrecno navedena z imenom in naslovom v operativnem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ni mogoče uporabiti in bo zanje veljala stopnja dajatve, ki velja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of an individual company anti-dumping duty rate (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [11] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo stopnje protidampinške dajatve za posamezno družbo (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj poslati Komisiji [11] z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti vsako spremembo dejavnosti družbe v zvezi s proizvodnjo, domačo prodajo in izvozom, povezanih na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali navedeno spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in Russia and Turkey and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (‘final disclosure’).
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterega pribora (fitingov) za cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije ter dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Odobreno jim je bilo tudi obdobje, v katerem so lahko predložile svoja stališča v zvezi s tem razkritjem.
Following the final disclosure, submissions were received from the complainant as well as from two cooperating exporting producers from Turkey and the ÇIB.
Po končnem razkritju so svoja stališča predložili pritožnik, dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika iz Turčije in združenje ÇIB.
Both Turkish producers and the ÇIB requested and have been granted hearings.
Oba turška proizvajalca in združenje ÇIB so zahtevali zaslišanje, ki jim je bilo odobreno.
The complainant agreed with all findings as disclosed.
Pritožnik se je strinjal z vsemi razkritimi ugotovitvami.
The oral and written comments submitted by two Turkish exporters and the ÇIB were a reiteration of the comments already made following the provisional disclosure.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložili združenje ÇIB in dva turška izvoznika, so bile ponovitev pripomb, ki so jih izrazili že po začasnem razkritju.
It is noted that none of the interested parties contested the underlying data.
Opozoriti je treba, da nobena od zainteresiranih strani ni nasprotovala osnovnim podatkom.
A justification and a reply to the claim for the application of the asymmetrical method including zeroing in the dumping calculation is provided in recitals 24 to 33 above.
Utemeljitev in odgovor na zahtevo po uporabi asimetrične metode, vključno z ničelno nastavitvijo, pri izračunu dampinga sta določena v uvodnih izjavah 24 do 33.
The use of Turkish Lira for the establishment of export price patterns is explained and the relevant claim addressed in recital 29 above.
Uporaba turške lire za določitev vzorcev izvoznih cen je pojasnjena v uvodni izjavi 29, kjer je tudi odgovor na ustrezno trditev.
The use of arithmetical average prices instead of weighted average prices in identifying patterns of export prices is explained and the relevant claim addressed in recital 30 above .
Uporaba aritmetičnega povprečja cen namesto tehtanega povprečja cen pri opredeljevanju vzorcev izvoznih cen je razložena v uvodni izjavi 30, kjer je tudi odgovor na ustrezno trditev.
The claim to include the profit margin achieved on the ocean freight into the export price is described and dismissed in recital 19 above.
Trditev, da bi morala biti stopnja dobička, dosežena pri čezmorskem prevozu, vključena v izvozno ceno, je opisana in zavrnjena v uvodni izjavi 19.
The claim that no cumulative assessment of Turkish and Russian imports is warranted in view of differences in geographical concentration of Turkish and Russian sales is described and dismissed in recitals 43 and 44 above.
Trditev, da kumulativna ocena turškega in ruskega uvoza zaradi razlik v geografski koncentraciji turške in ruske prodaje ni upravičena, je opisana in zavrnjena v uvodnih izjavah 43 in 44.
The claim that Union industry suffered no injury given their increased market share is addressed and dismissed in recitals 48 to 50 above.
Trditev, da industrija Unije zaradi povečanja tržnega deleža ni utrpela škode, je opisana in zavrnjena v uvodnih izjava 48 do 50.
Given that following the final disclosure no arguments that would influence the outcome of the assessment of the case were brought forward, no modification of the findings as detailed above is warranted.
Glede na to, da po končnem razkritju niso bili podani nobeni argumenti, ki bi lahko vplivali na rezultat ocene primera, sprememba ugotovitev, kot so opisane zgoraj, ni potrebna.
H. DEFINITIVE COLLECTION OF THE PROVISIONAL DUTY
H. DOKONČNO POBIRANJE ZAČASNIH DAJATEV
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margin found and given the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the definitive duty imposed,
Glede na obseg ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in glede na raven škode, povzročene industriji Unije, se šteje za nujno, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, ki je bila uvedena z začasno uredbo, dokončno poberejo v obsegu višine uvedene dokončne dajatve –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of tube and pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, currently falling within CN codes ex73079311, ex73079319 and ex73079980 (TARIC codes 7307931191, 7307931193, 7307931194, 7307931195, 7307931199, 7307931991, 7307931993, 7307931994, 7307931995, 7307931999, 7307998092, 7307998093, 7307998094, 7307998095 and 7307998098) and originating in Russia and Turkey.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz pribora (fitingov) za cevi (razen litega pribora (fitingov), prirobnic in pribora (fitingov) z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla), z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, vrste, ki se uporablja za varjenje ali druge namene, trenutno uvrščenega pod oznake KN ex73079311, ex73079319 in ex73079980 (oznake TARIC 7307931191, 7307931193, 7307931194, 7307931195, 7307931199, 7307931991, 7307931993, 7307931994, 7307931995, 7307931999, 7307998092, 7307998093, 7307998094, 7307998095 in 7307998098) s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the companies listed below, shall be as follows:
Stopnja veljavne dokončne protidampinške dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelke iz odstavka 1, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju, je:
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 699/2012 on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in Russia and Turkey shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 699/2012 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterega pribora (fitingov) za cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Rusije in Turčije, se dokončno poberejo.
OJ L 203, 31.7.2012, p. 37.
UL L 203, 31.7.2012, str. 37.
Case T-274/02 Ritek Corp. and Prodisc Technology Inc. v Council [2006] ECR II-4305, paragraph 57.
Sodba z dne 24. oktobra 2006 v zadevi T-274/02, Ritek Corp. in Prodisc Technology Inc. proti Svetu (ZOdl. 2006, str. II-4305, točka 57).
Case T-274/02 Ritek Corp. and Prodisc Technology Inc. v Council [2006] ECR II-4305 paragraph 60.
Sodba z dne 24. oktobra 2006 v zadevi T-274/02, Ritek Corp. in Prodisc Technology Inc. proti Svetu (ZOdl. 2006, str. II-4305, točka 60).
Case T-274/02 Ritek Corp. and Prodisc Technology Inc. v Council [2006] ECR II-4305 paragraph 51 — last sentence.
Sodba z dne 24. oktobra 2006 v zadevi T-274/02, Ritek Corp. in Prodisc Technology Inc. proti Svetu (ZOdl. 2006, str. II-4305, točka 51 – zadnji stavek).
WTO Appellate Body Report, European Communities — Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India.
Poročilo pritožbenega organa STO, Evropske skupnosti – protidampinške dajatve na uvoz bombažnega posteljnega perila iz Indije.
Case T-274/02 Ritek Corp. and Prodisc Technology Inc. v Council [2006] ECR II-4305 paragraphs 98-103.
Sodba z dne 24. oktobra 2006 v zadevi T-274/02, Ritek Corp. in Prodisc Technology Inc. proti Svetu (ZOdl. 2006, str. II-4305, točke 98–103).
OJ L 234, 3.10.1995, p. 4.
UL L 234, 3.10.1995, str. 4.
That information has been explicitly used for the comparison between export price and normal value.
Prav ti podatki so bili uporabljeni pri primerjavi med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo.
In other words, seamless fittings have only been compared with seamless fittings and welded fittings have only been compared with welded fittings.
Z drugimi besedami, brezšivni pribor se je primerjal samo z brezšivnim priborom in varjen pribor se je primerjal samo z varjenim priborom.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 79/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 79/2013
making imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia subject to registration
o obvezni registraciji uvoza biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 10(4) and 14(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), zlasti člena 10(4) in člena 14(5) Uredbe,
On 29 August 2012, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (‘the countries concerned’) following a complaint lodged on 17 July 2012 by the European Biodiesel Board (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of biodiesel.
(1) Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 29. avgusta 2012 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], („obvestilo o začetku“) napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije („zadevni državi“) na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 17. julija 2012 vložil Evropski odbor za biodizel („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje biodizla v Uniji.
The product concerned by this registration is the same as that defined in the notice of initiation, i.e. fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend, currently falling within CN codes ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097, 38260010 and ex38260090, and originating in Argentina and Indonesia.
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta registracija, je enak izdelku, opredeljenem v obvestilu o začetku, tj. monoalkilni estri maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinska plinska olja, pridobljeni s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnega izvora, v čisti obliki ali mešanici, trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097, 38260010 in ex38260090 ter s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije.
Following the publication of the notice of initiation, the complainant requested in September 2012 that imports of the product concerned are made subject to registration pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Po objavi obvestila o začetku je pritožnik septembra 2012 zahteval, da se na podlagi člena 14(5) osnovne uredbe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka uvede obvezna registracija, da se od datuma take registracije proti navedenemu uvozu lahko uporabijo ukrepi.
According to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission may, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom carinskim organom odredi, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza, da se proti navedenemu uvozu od datuma take registracije lahko uporabijo ukrepi.
Imports may be made subject to registration following a request from the Union industry which contains sufficient evidence to justify such action.
Obvezna registracija uvoza se lahko uvede na podlagi zahtevka industrije Unije, ki vsebuje zadostne dokaze, ki upravičujejo tak ukrep.
The complainant claimed that registration is justified as the product concerned was dumped and injury to the Union industry was caused by the surge in dumped imports in a relatively short period of time.
Pritožnik je trdil, da je registracija upravičena, ker se je zadevni izdelek uvažal po dampinških cenah in je bila z nenadnim porastom dampinškega uvoza v relativno kratkem času industriji Unije povzročena škoda.