natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The substance is currently authorised for use in several categories of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages.
Snov je trenutno odobrena za uporabo v več kategorijah alkoholnih in brezalkoholnih pijač.
This implies that this use does not represent a hazard to health.
To pomeni, da ta uporaba ne ogroža zdravja.
It is therefore appropriate to allow the use of dimethyl dicarbonate (E 242) for the preservation of all products belonging to category 14.2.8 (‘Other alcoholic drinks including mixtures of alcoholic drinks with non-alcoholic drinks and spirits with less than 15 % of alcohol’).
Zato je primerno dovoliti uporabo dimetil dikarbonata (E 242) za konzerviranje vseh proizvodov, ki spadajo v kategorijo 14.2.8 („Druge alkoholne pijače, vključno z mešanicami alkoholnih z brezalkoholnimi pijačami ter žganji z manj kot 15 % alkohola“).
Since the authorisation of use of dimethyl dicarbonate (E 242) for the preservation of all products belonging to category 14.2.8 constitutes an update of that list which is not liable to have an effect on human health, it is not necessary to seek the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority.
Odobritev uporabe dimetil dikarbonata (E 242) za konzerviranje vseh proizvodov, ki spadajo v kategorijo 14.2.8, pomeni posodobitev navedenega seznama, ki ne bo imela učinka na zdravje ljudi, zato Evropske agencije za varnost hrane ni treba zaprositi za mnenje.
Therefore, Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 should be amended accordingly.
Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 bi zato bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
SCF/CS/ADD/CONS/43 Final, 12 July 2001.
SCF/CS/ADD/CONS/43 Final, 12. julija 2001.
In Part E of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 the entry for additive E 242 in food category 14.2.8 ‘Other alcoholic drinks including mixtures of alcoholic drinks with non-alcoholic drinks and spirits with less than 15 % of alcohol’ is replaced by the following:
V delu E Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 se vnos za aditiv E 242 pod številko 14.2.8 kategorije živil „Druge alkoholne pijače, vključno z mešanicami alkoholnih z brezalkoholnimi pijačami ter žganji z manj kot 15 % alkohola“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
Dimethyl dicarbonate (E 242) was last evaluated by the Scientific Committee on Food in 2001 [3].
Znanstveni odbor za hrano je dimetil dikarbonat (E 242) nazadnje ocenil leta 2001 [3].
The substance is considered to be of no toxicological concern as at the use level of 250 mg/l it is unstable and breaks down in substances the residues of which are considered harmless.
Šteje se, da glede snovi s toksikološkega vidika ni pomislekov, saj je pri vnosu 250 mg/l nestabilna in razpade v snovi, katerih ostanki niso škodljivi.
Pursuant to the transitional provisions of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1129/2011 of 11 November 2011 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a Union list of food additives [4], Annex II establishing the Union list of food additives approved for use in foods and conditions of use applies from 1 June 2013.
V skladu s prehodnimi določbami Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1129/2011 z dne 11. novembra 2011 o spremembi Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z vzpostavitvijo seznama Unije aditivov za živila [4] se Priloga II s seznamom Unije aditivov za živila, odobrenih za uporabo v živilih, in pogoji njihove uporabe uporablja od 1. junija 2013.
In order to allow the use of dimethyl dicarbonate (E 242) for the preservation of all products belonging to category 14.2.8 before that date, it is necessary to specify an earlier date of application with regard to that food additive.
Da se dovoli uporaba dimetil dikarbonata (E 242) za konzerviranje vseh proizvodov, ki spadajo v kategorijo 14.2.8, pred navedenim datumom, je treba določiti zgodnejši datum tovrstne uporabe navedenega aditiva za živila.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1167/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1167/2012
Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1168/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti
In Case C-249/10 P [2], the Court of Justice ruled that the sampling technique provided for in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 [3] may not be applied for the purposes of determining claims for market economy treatment pursuant to subparagraph (c) of Article 2(7) of that Regulation.
Sodišče je v zadevi C-249/10 P [2] razsodilo, da se tehnika vzorčenja iz člena 17 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 [3], ne sme uporabljati za odločanje o zahtevkih za individualno tržnogospodarsko obravnavo na podlagi pododstavka (c) člena 2(7) navedene uredbe.
The ruling by the Court of Justice would require that the Commission examine all applications for market economy treatment filed by cooperating exporting producers who are not part of the sample, irrespective of whether the number of cooperating producers is large.
Glede na sodbo Sodišča bi Komisija morala proučiti vse zahtevke za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo, ki jih vložijo sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso vključeni v vzorec, ne glede na veliko število sodelujočih proizvajalcev.
However, such a practice would impose a disproportionate administrative burden on the investigating authorities of the Union.
Vendar bi taka praksa pomenila nesorazmerno upravno obremenitev preiskovalnih organov Unije.
Therefore, it is appropriate to amend Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.
Zato je primerno spremeniti Uredbo (ES) št. 1225/2009.
Moreover, the use of the sampling technique provided for in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 for the purposes of determining claims for market economy treatment pursuant to subparagraph (c) of Article 2(7) of that Regulation is allowed under the rules of the World Trade Organisation.
Poleg tega je uporaba tehnike vzorčenja iz člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 za namene odločanja o zahtevkih za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo na podlagi pododstavka (c) člena 2(7) navedene uredbe dovoljena po pravilih Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
For example, the panel of the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organisation in the dispute DS405 ‘European Union — Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Footwear from China’ [4] (report adopted on 22 February 2012) found that China did not establish that the Union acted inconsistently with Articles 2.4 and 6.10.2 of the Anti-dumping Agreement, paragraph 15(a)(ii) of China’s Accession Protocol, and paragraph 151(e) and (f) of China’s Accession Working Party Report, by failing to examine the market economy treatment applications of the cooperating Chinese exporting producers that were not part of the sample for the original investigation.
Ugotovitveni svet Organa Svetovne trgovinske organizacije za reševanje sporov je na primer v sporu DS405 „Evropska unija – Protidampinški ukrepi za nekatere vrste obutve iz Kitajske“ [4] (poročilo sprejeto 22. februarja 2012) ugotovil, da Kitajska ni dokazala, da je Unija kršila člen 2.4 in člen 6.10.2 Protidampinškega sporazuma, odstavek 15(a)(ii) Protokola o pristopu Kitajske ter odstavka 151(e) in (f) poročila delovne skupine za pristop Kitajske, s tem ko ni proučila zahtevkov za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec za prvotno preiskavo.
Therefore, taking into account that background and for reasons of legal certainty, it is considered appropriate to introduce a provision clarifying that the decision to limit the investigation to a reasonable number of parties by using samples on the basis of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 also applies to the parties subject to an examination in accordance with subparagraphs (b) and (c) of Article 2(7) of that Regulation.
Zato je ob upoštevanju tega ozadja in zaradi pravne varnosti primerno vključiti določbo, ki pojasnjuje, da se odločitev za omejitev preiskave na smiselno število strani z uporabo vzorcev na podlagi člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 uporablja tudi za strani, ki so predmet preiskave v skladu s pododstavkoma (b) in (c) člena 2(7) navedene uredbe.
Consequently, it is also appropriate to clarify that a determination under subparagraph (c) of Article 2(7) of that Regulation should not be made for exporting producers that are not part of the sample, unless such producers request and obtain individual examination in accordance with Article 17(3) thereof.
Zato je tudi primerno pojasniti, da se odločanje o zahtevkih v skladu s pododstavkom (c) člena 2(7) navedene uredbe ne bi smelo izvajati za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso vključeni v vzorec, razen če so v skladu s členom 17(3) navedene uredbe zahtevali individualno preiskavo, ki jim je bila odobrena.
Furthermore, it is considered appropriate to clarify that the anti-dumping duty to be applied to imports from exporters or producers which have made themselves known in accordance with Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 but were not included in the examination is not to exceed the weighted average margin of dumping established for the parties in the sample, irrespective of whether the normal value established for such parties was determined on the basis of Article 2(1) to (6) or subparagraph (a) of Article 2(7) of that Regulation.
Nadalje je primerno pojasniti, da protidampinška dajatev na uvoz od izvoznikov ali proizvajalcev, ki so se javili v skladu s členom 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009, vendar niso bili vključeni v preiskavo, ne presega tehtanega povprečja stopnje dampinga, ki je bila ugotovljena za strani v vzorcu, ne glede na to, ali je bila normalna vrednost, določena za te strani, izračunana na podlagi člena 2(1) do (6) ali pododstavka (a) člena 2(7) navedene uredbe.
Finally, the three-month time limit by which a determination pursuant to subparagraph (c) of Article 2(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 should be made has proved impracticable, in particular in proceedings where sampling in accordance with Article 17 of that Regulation is applied.
Trimesečni časovni rok za odločanje o zahtevkih v skladu s pododstavkom (c) člena 2(7) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 se je izkazal za neizvedljivega zlasti v postopkih, v katerih se je uporabilo vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 navedene uredbe.
It is therefore considered appropriate to extend that time limit.
Zato je primerno podaljšati ta rok.
In the interests of legal certainty and the principle of sound administration, it is necessary to provide that the amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 provided for in this Regulation are to apply as soon as possible to all new and to all pending investigations.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in načela dobrega upravljanja je treba zagotoviti, da se spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 iz te uredbe začnejo čim prej uporabljati za vse nove in vse tekoče preiskave.
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 1225/2009 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1225/2009 se spremeni:
Article 2(7) is amended as follows:
člen 2(7) se spremeni:
in the penultimate sentence of subparagraph (c) the words ‘shall be made within three months of the initiation of the investigation’ are replaced by the words ‘shall normally be made within seven months of, but in any event not later than eight months after, the initiation of the investigation’;
v predzadnjem stavku pododstavka (c) se besede „v treh mesecih po sprožitvi preiskave“ nadomestijo z besedami „običajno v sedmih mesecih, vendar v nobenem primeru ne pozneje kot v osmih mesecih po sprožitvi preiskave“;
When the Commission has limited its examination in accordance with Article 17, a determination pursuant to subparagraphs (b) and (c) of this paragraph shall be limited to the parties included in the examination and any producer that receives individual treatment pursuant to Article 17(3).’;
Ko Komisija omeji preiskavo v skladu s členom 17, se odločanje o zahtevkih v skladu s pododstavkoma (b) in (c) tega odstavka omeji na strani, vključene v preiskavo, in na vse proizvajalce, ki imajo individualno obravnavo v skladu s členom 17(3).“;
in Article 9(6), the first sentence is replaced by the following:
v členu 9(6) se prvi stavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘When the Commission has limited its examination in accordance with Article 17, any anti-dumping duty applied to imports from exporters or producers which have made themselves known in accordance with Article 17 but were not included in the examination shall not exceed the weighted average margin of dumping established with respect to the parties in the sample, irrespective of whether the normal value for such parties is determined on the basis of Article 2(1) to (6) or subparagraph (a) of Article 2(7).’.
„Ko Komisija omeji preiskavo v skladu s členom 17, nobena protidampinška dajatev na uvoz od izvoznikov ali proizvajalcev, ki so se javili v skladu s členom 17, vendar niso bili vključeni v preiskavo, ne presega tehtanega povprečja stopnje dampinga, ki je bilo ugotovljeno za strani v vzorcu, ne glede na to, ali je normalna vrednost za te strani izračunana na podlagi člena 2(1) do (6) ali pododstavka (a) člena 2(7).“.
This Regulation shall apply to all new and to all pending investigations as from 15 December 2012.
Ta uredba se od 15. decembra 2012 uporablja za vse nove in vse tekoče preiskave.
Done at Strasbourg, 12 December 2012.
V Strasbourgu, 12. decembra 2012
Position of the European Parliament of 25 October 2012 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 6 December 2012.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 6. decembra 2012.
Case C-249/10 P Brosmann Footwear (HK) and others v Council, judgment of 2 February 2012.
Zadeva C-249/10 P – Brosmann Footwear (HK) in drugi proti Svetu, sodba z dne 2. februarja 2012.
WTO, Report of the Panel, WT/DS405/R, 28 October 2011.
STO, Poročilo odbora, WT/DS405/R, 28. oktober 2011.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1169/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1169/2012
implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012
o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu in razveljavitvi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 542/2012
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism [1], and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu [1] in zlasti člena 2(3) Uredbe,
On 25 June 2012, the Council adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012 [2] implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001, establishing an updated list of persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies.
Svet je 25. junija 2012 sprejel Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 542/2012 [2] o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001, v kateri je posodobljen seznam oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere se uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 2580/2001.
The Council has provided all the persons, groups and entities for which it was practically possible with statements of reasons explaining why they were listed in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012.
Svet je vsem osebam, skupinam in subjektom, za katere je bilo to praktično izvedljivo, utemeljil razloge, zakaj so bile uvrščene na seznam Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 542/2012.
By way of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Council informed the persons, groups and entities listed in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012 that it had decided to keep them on the list.
Z objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije je Svet obvestil osebe, skupine in subjekte s seznama iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 542/2012, da jih je sklenil obdržati na seznamu.
In the case of certain person and groups, an amended statement of reasons was made available.
V zvezi z določenimi osebami in skupinami so bile pripravljene spremenjene utemeljitve razlogov.
When doing so it took account of observations submitted to the Council by those concerned.
Pri tem je upošteval pripombe, ki so jih zadevni predložili Svetu.
The list of the persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies should be updated accordingly and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012 should be repealed,
Seznam oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere se uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 2580/2001, bi bilo treba ustrezno posodobiti, Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 542/2012 pa bi bilo treba razveljaviti –
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012 is hereby repealed.
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 542/2012 se razveljavi.
LIST OF PERSONS, GROUPS AND ENTITIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1
SEZNAM OSEB, SKUPIN IN SUBJEKTOV IZ ČLENA 1
BOUYERI, Mohammed (a.k.a. Abu ZUBAIR, a.k.a. SOBIAR, a.k.a. Abu ZOUBAIR), born 8.3.1978 in Amsterdam (The Netherlands) – member of the ‘Hofstadgroep’
BOUYERI, Mohammed (alias Abu ZUBAIR, alias SOBIAR, alias Abu ZOUBAIR), rojen 8. 3. 1978 v Amsterdamu (Nizozemska) – član skupine „Hofstadgroep“;
FAHAS, Sofiane Yacine, born 10.9.1971 in Algiers (Algeria) – member of ‘al-Takfir’ and ‘al-Hijra’
FAHAS, Sofiane Yacine, rojena 10. 9. 1971 v Alžiru (Alžirija) – članica skupin „al-Takfir“ in „al-Hijra“;
‘Abu Nidal Organisation’ – ‘ANO’ (a.k.a. ‘Fatah Revolutionary Council’, a.k.a. ‘Arab Revolutionary Brigades’, a.k.a. ‘Black September’, a.k.a. ‘Revolutionary Organisation of Socialist Muslims’)
„Abu Nidal Organisation“ (Organizacija Abu Nidal) – „ANO“ (alias„Fatah Revolutionary Council“ (Revolucionarni svet Fataha), alias„Arab Revolutionary Brigades“ (Arabske revolucionarne brigade), alias„Black September“ (Črni september), alias„Revolutionary Organisation of Socialist Muslims“ (Revolucionarna organizacija socialističnih muslimanov));
‘Communist Party of the Philippines’, including ‘New People’s Army’ – ‘NPA’, Philippines
„Communist Party of the Philippines“ (Komunistična partija Filipinov), vključno z „New Peoples Army“ (Novo ljudsko vojsko) – „NPA“, Filipini;
‘Gama'a al-Islamiyya’ (a.k.a. ‘Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya’) (‘Islamic Group’ – ‘IG’)
„Gama’a al-Islamiyya“ (alias„Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya“) („Islamic Group“ (Islamistična skupina) – „IG“);
‘Hamas’, including ‘Hamas-Izz al-Din al-Qassem’
„Hamas“, vključno z „Hamas-Izz al-Din al-Qassem“;
‘Hizbul Mujahideen’ – ‘HM’
„Hizbul Mujahideen“ – „HM“;
‘International Sikh Youth Federation’ – ‘ISYF’
„International Sikh Youth Federation“ – „ISYF“ (Mednarodna federacija sikhovske mladine);
‘Kurdistan Workers’ Party’ – ‘PKK’, (a.k.a. ‘KADEK’, a.k.a. ‘KONGRA-GEL’)
„Kurdistan Workers’ Party“ (Delavska stranka Kurdistana) – „PKK“ (alias„KADEK“, alias„KONGRA-GEL“);
‘Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam’ – ‘LTTE’
„Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam“ (Osvobodilni tigri tamilskega Eelama) – „LTTE“;
‘Palestinian Islamic Jihad’ – ‘PIJ’
„Palestinian Islamic Jihad“ (Palestinski islamski džihad) – „PIJ“;
‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine’ – ‘PFLP’
„Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine“ (Ljudska fronta za osvoboditev Palestine) – „PFLP“;
‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command’ (a.k.a. ‘PFLP – General Command’)
„Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command“ (Ljudska fronta za osvoboditev Palestine – glavno poveljstvo) (alias„PFLP-General Command“ (PFLP – glavno poveljstvo));
‘Fuerzas armadas revolucionarias de Colombia’ – ‘FARC’ (‘Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia’)
„Fuerzas armadas revolucionarias de Colombia“ – „FARC“ („Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia“ (Oborožene revolucionarne sile Kolumbije));
‘Devrimci Halk Kurtuluș Partisi-Cephesi’ – ‘DHKP/C’ (a.k.a. ‘Devrimci Sol’ (‘Revolutionary Left’), a.k.a. ‘Dev Sol’) (‘Revolutionary People’s Liberation Army/Front/Party’)
„Devrimci Halk Kurtuluș Partisi-Cephesi“ – „DHKP/C“ („Revolutionary People’s Liberation Army/Front/Party“ (Revolucionarna ljudska osvobodilna vojska/fronta/stranka) (alias„Devrimci Sol“ („Revolutionary Left“ (Revolucionarna levica)), alias„Dev Sol“);
‘Sendero Luminoso’ – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’)
„Sendero Luminoso“ – „SL“ („Shining Path“ (Sijoča pot));
‘Stichting Al Aqsa’ (a.k.a. ‘Stichting Al Aqsa Nederland’, a.k.a. ‘Al Aqsa Nederland’)
„Stichting Al Aqsa“ (alias„Stichting Al Aqsa Nederland“, alias„Al Aqsa Nederland“);
‘Teyrbazen Azadiya Kurdistan’ – ‘TAK’ (a.k.a. ‘Kurdistan Freedom Falcons’, a.k.a. ‘Kurdistan Freedom Hawks’)
„Teyrbazen Azadiya Kurdistan“ - „TAK“ (alias„Kurdistan Freedom Falcons“, alias„Kurdistan Freedon Hawks“ (Kurdistanski sokoli svobode)).
ABDOLLAHI Hamed (a.k.a. Mustafa Abdullahi), born 11.8.1960 in Iran. Passport: D9004878
ABDOLLAHI Hamed (alias Mustafa Abdullahi), rojen 11. 8. 1960 v Iranu; potni list št. D9004878;
ARBABSIAR Manssor (a.k.a. Mansour Arbabsiar), born March 6 or 15, 1955 in Iran. Iranian and US national.
ARBABSIAR Manssor (alias Mansour Arbabsiar), rojen 6. ali 15. 3. 1955 v Iranu; državljan Irana in Združenih držav Amerike; potni list št. C2002515 (Iran), potni list št. 477845448 (ZDA); nacionalna osebna izkaznica št. 07442833, veljavna do 15.
SHAHLAI Abdul Reza (a.k.a. Abdol Reza Shala'i, a.k.a. Abd-al Reza Shalai, a.k.a. Abdorreza Shahlai, a.k.a. Abdolreza Shahla'i, a.k.a. Abdul-Reza Shahlaee, a.k.a. Hajj Yusef, a.k.a. Haji Yusif, a.k.a. Hajji Yasir, a.k.a. Hajji Yusif, a.k.a.Yusuf Abu-al-Karkh), born circa 1957 in Iran. Addresses: (1) Kermanshah, Iran, (2) Mehran Military Base, Ilam Province, Iran
SHAHLAI Abdul Reza (alias Abdol Reza Shala’i, alias Abd-al Reza Shalai, alias Abdorreza Shahlai, alias Abdolreza Shahla’i, alias Abdul-Reza Shahlaee, alias Hajj Yusef, alias Haji Yusif, alias Hajji Yasir, alias Hajji Yusif, alias Yusuf Abu-al-Karkh), rojen okoli leta 1957 v Iranu; naslova: (1) Kermanshah, Iran, (2) vojaško oporišče Mehran, provinca Ilam, Iran;
SOLEIMANI Qasem (a.k.a. Ghasem Soleymani, a.k.a. Qasmi Sulayman, a.k.a. Qasem Soleymani, a.k.a. Qasem Solaimani, a.k.a. Qasem Salimani, a.k.a. Qasem Solemani, a.k.a. Qasem Sulaimani, a.k.a. Qasem Sulemani), born 11.3.1957 in Iran. Iranian national. Passport: 008827 (Iran Diplomatic), issued 1999. Title: Major General
SOLEIMANI Qasem (alias Ghasem Soleymani, alias Qasmi Sulayman, alias Qasem Soleymani, alias Qasem Solaimani, alias Qasem Salimani, alias Qasem Solemani, alias Qasem Sulaimani, alias Qasem Sulemani), rojen 11. marca 1957 v Iranu; iranski državljan; potni list št. 008827 (iranski diplomatski potni list), izdan leta 1999; naziv: generalmajor.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1170/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1170/2012
It is appropriate to provide that binding tariff information which has been issued by the customs authorities of Member States in respect of the classification of goods in the Combined Nomenclature but which is not in accordance with this Regulation can, for a period of three months, continue to be invoked by the holder, under Article 12(6) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [2].
Primerno je določiti, da se lahko imetnik v skladu s členom 12(6) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [2] še tri mesece sklicuje na zavezujoče tarifne informacije, ki jih izdajajo carinski organi držav članic v zvezi z uvrstitvijo blaga v kombinirano nomenklaturo in niso v skladu s to uredbo.
The Customs Code Committee has not issued an opinion within the time limits set by its chairman,
Odbor za carinski zakonik ni izdal mnenja v rokih, ki jih je določil njegov predsednik –
An article consisting of a garland of artificial flowers of different colours, an imitation of a so-called ‘lei’.
Izdelek je venec umetnih cvetov različnih barv, imitacija tako imenovanega „havajskega cvetličnega venca“.