natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These liabilities arose from, first, the higher pension contributions payable in respect of employees with civil servant status and, secondly, the requirement to ensure the equilibrium of its retirement scheme for these employees.
Te obveznosti so izhajale iz, prvič, višjih pokojninskih prispevkov, ki jih je bilo treba plačati za zaposlene s statusom državnih uradnikov, in, drugič, iz zahteve, da se za te zaposlene zagotovi finančno ravnovesje pokojninske sheme.
The Commission noted that the measures were limited to what was strictly necessary to establish a level playing field for social security contributions and ultimately would therefore favour the development of competition and further liberalisation of the postal sector.
Komisija je navedla, da so bili ukrepi omejeni samo na tisto, kar je bilo nujno potrebno za vzpostavitev enakih konkurenčnih pogojev pri prispevkih za socialno varnost ter bi navsezadnje spodbudilo razvoj konkurence in nadaljnjo liberalizacijo poštnega sektorja.
It further noted, by way of drawing a parallel with the EDF decision, that La Poste no longer recruited civil servants and that the future pensions payments of La Poste placed it in a comparable situation vis-à-vis its competitors as regards social security contributions.
S primerjavo z odločbo v zadevi EDF je Komisija nadalje navedla, da družba La Poste ni več zaposlovala državnih uradnikov in da so prihodnja plačila za pokojnine družbo La Poste postavljala v položaj, primerljiv z njenimi konkurenti glede prispevkov za socialno varnost.
In its Decision of 25 January 2012 concerning subsidies for the financing of the civil servants’ pension costs at Deutsche Post [38], the Commission verified, in line with its La Poste Decision, whether the social security contributions borne by Deutsche Post were equivalent to those of private competitors.
Komisija je v svoji odločbi z dne 25. januarja 2012 v zvezi s subvencijami za financiranje stroškov pokojnin za državne uradnike pri Deutsche Post [38] na podlagi svoje odločbe v zadevi La Poste preverila, ali so bili prispevki za socialno varnost, ki jih je plačevala družba Deutsche Post, enakovredni prispevkom zasebnih konkurentov.
The Commission found that, in addition to pension subsidies, Deutsche Post has also benefitted from dedicated stamp price increases to finance the civil servants’ pension costs.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je družba Deutsche Post poleg subvencij za pokojnine uživala tudi koristi od zvišanja cen priložnostnih poštnih znamk, iz katerega je financirala stroške pokojnin državnih uradnikov.
Taking account of this extra relief, Deutsche Post had effectively borne significantly lower social contributions than private competitors in certain market segments.
Ob upoštevanju te izredne pomoči je družba Deutsche Post dejansko plačevala bistveno nižje socialne prispevke v primerjavi z zasebnimi konkurenti v nekaterih tržnih segmentih.
Accordingly the Commission declared the pension subsidies as partly incompatible with the internal market and ordered Germany to recover the incompatible share of the pension subsidies.
Zato je Komisija subvencije za pokojnine razglasila za delno nezdružljive z notranjim trgom in Nemčiji naložila vračilo nezdružljivega deleža subvencij za pokojnine.
In its Decision on the same day in BPost [39], the Commission found the State aid granted to BPost for the relief of civil servants’ pension liabilities as compatible with the internal market under Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty since it only relieved BPost of legacy pension costs without placing the company in a more favourable position than its competitors as regards the social security contributions.
Komisija je v svoji odločbi na isti dan v zadevi BPost [39] ugotovila, da je državna pomoč, dodeljena družbi BPost za oprostitev pokojninskih obveznosti za državne uradnike, združljiva z notranjim trgom na podlagi člena 107(3)(c) Pogodbe, saj je družbo BPost zgolj razbremenila preteklih stroškov pokojnin, ne da bi jo pri tem postavila v ugodnejši položaj glede prispevkov za socialno varnost v primerjavi z njenimi konkurenti.
The Commission verified that the social security contributions borne by Belgian Post were equivalent to those of private competitors.
Komisija je preverila, ali so prispevki za socialno varnost, ki jih plačuje družba Belgian Post, enakovredni tistim, ki jih plačujejo zasebni konkurenti.
There are certain parallels between the case on RMG and previous case-law.
Obstajajo nekatere vzporednice med zadevo RMG in prejšnjo sodno prakso.
First of all, all cases involve material economic risk and involve uncapped liabilities: RMG bears the economic risk of a pension scheme which stems from RMG’s public monopoly legacy.
Prvič, vsi primeri vključujejo znatno gospodarsko tveganje in neomejene obveznosti: skupina RMG nosi gospodarsko tveganje, povezano s pokojninsko shemo, ki izvira iz preteklega monopolnega položaja RMG.
The other postal incumbents bore a similar economic risk prior to being relieved of their liabilities, and were similarly disadvantaged when compared to their competitors.
Drugi uveljavljeni poštni operaterji so nosili podobno gospodarsko tveganje, preden so bili razbremenjeni svojih obveznosti, in so bili podobno v slabšem položaju v primerjavi s svojimi konkurenti.
All cases concern aid beneficiaries in equivalent positions because their pension arrangements differed very significantly from the competitors’ pension arrangements.
Vsi primeri se nanašajo na upravičence do pomoči, ki so v enakovrednih položajih, saj so se njihovi pokojninski sistemi precej razlikovali od pokojninskih sistemov konkurentov.
Second of all, as with the previous cases, the Commission considers that in the absence of any State intervention to relieve RMG of at least part of the pension liabilities, RMG would not be able to compete on its merits with its competitors.
Drugič, enako kot v prejšnjih primerih Komisija meni, da brez posredovanja države, ki bi skupino RMG vsaj delno razbremenilo pokojninskih obveznosti, ta ne bi mogla samostojno konkurirati s svojimi konkurenti.
After all, leaving RMG with the pension deficit would lead to its bankruptcy.
Navsezadnje bi tak pokojninski primanjkljaj vodil do stečaja skupine RMG.
As mentioned in recital 29, RMG has shown at the end of the 2010/2011 financial year negative operating assets on its balance sheet.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 29, je bilanca stanja RMG ob koncu finančnega leta 2010/11 izkazovala negativna poslovna sredstva.
Even after a successful implementation of the restructuring plan RMG would remain with net liabilities of at least GBP 2000 million without a relief of the pension deficit.
Tudi po uspešni izvedbi načrta prestrukturiranja bi skupini RMG ostale čiste obveznosti v višini najmanj 2000 milijonov GBP brez pomoči za odpravo pokojninskega primanjkljaja.
However, there are some factors which distinguish the previous cases from this case.
Vendar se v nekaterih dejavnikih prejšnji primeri razlikujejo od obravnavanega.
In the first place, the UK pension arrangements differ significantly from those in other Member States.
Prvič, pokojninski sistemi v Združenem kraljestvu se precej razlikujejo od sistemov v drugih državah članicah.
Most occupational pension schemes are ‘contracted out’ of the State pension arrangements known as the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme.
Večina poklicnih pokojninskih shem se iz državnega pokojninskega sistema, poznanega kot State Earnings Related Pension Scheme (pokojninska shema, povezana z državnimi prihodki), „odda zunanjim izvajalcem“.
Most large employers run their own pension schemes.
Večina velikih delodajalcev upravlja lastne pokojninske sheme.
Under UK pension law, those schemes must provide a pension entitlement which meets certain standards, and employers have certain obligations to ensure that schemes are adequately funded.
V skladu s pokojninsko zakonodajo Združenega kraljestva morajo te sheme zagotavljati pokojninsko pravico, ki izpolnjuje določene standarde, delodajalci pa morajo zagotoviti, da se te sheme ustrezno financirajo.
Under current accounting standards (IAS), employers must record deficits on such pension schemes on their balance sheets.
V skladu s trenutnimi računovodskimi standardi (MRS) morajo delodajalci primanjkljaje v takih pokojninskih shemah zabeležiti v svoji bilanci stanja.
In this respect, the RMPP is in principle similar to pension funds of private competitors.
S tega vidika shema RMPP načeloma deluje podobno kot pokojninski skladi zasebnih konkurentov.
The only difference between RMG and competitors lies in the fact that the level of pension liabilities — and thus the deficit of the RMPP — has arisen from terms and conditions which were agreed during the monopoly period and in line with the status of civil servants.
Edina razlika med shemo RMG in konkurenti je v tem, da stopnja pokojninskih obveznosti, in s tem primanjkljaj sheme RMPP, izhaja iz pogojev, ki so bili dogovorjeni v obdobju monopola in ob upoštevanju statusa državnih uradnikov.
Furthermore, the terms and levels of other social costs (for example contributions to the State pension arrangement, contributions to health and unemployment insurances) do not differ between RMG’s employees and private competitors’ employees.
Poleg tega pogoji in stopnje drugih socialnih stroškov (na primer prispevki v državni pokojninski sistem, prispevki za zdravstveno zavarovanje in zavarovanje za primer brezposelnosti) ne razlikujejo med zaposlenimi pri RMG in zaposlenimi pri zasebnih konkurentih.
Finally, RMG will remain liable for all newly accrued liabilities in the future as well as for new liabilities from an increase in the previously-accrued benefits of current employees as a result of future above-inflation wage increases.
Ne nazadnje bo skupina RMG še naprej odgovorna za vse novo nastale obveznosti v prihodnosti in tudi za nove obveznosti zaradi povečanja prej pridobljenih ugodnosti sedanjih zaposlenih kot posledica prihodnjih rasti plač nad stopnjo inflacije.
This means that RMG will continue to bear the same level of pension costs for newly accrued pension rights.
To pomeni, da bo skupina RMG še naprej plačevala enako stopnjo stroškov pokojnin za novo pridobljene pokojninske pravice.
The notified pension relief will therefore only reduce historic pension liabilities up to the date of the pension relief on 1 April 2012, while RMG remains fully responsible for any deficit that may arise from newly accrued pension rights after the pension relief on 1 April 2012.
Priglašena odprava pokojninskega primanjkljaja bo torej zmanjšala samo pretekle pokojninske obveznosti do prejema pomoči 1. aprila 2012, medtem ko skupina RMG še naprej ostaja v celoti odgovorna za vse primanjkljaje, ki lahko nastanejo iz novo pridobljenih pokojninskih pravic po prejemu pomoči 1. aprila 2012.
These differences justify an adjustment of the approach followed in previous cases to assess the compatibility of the measure at issue and to account for the specificities of the UK pension arrangements.
Te razlike upravičujejo prilagoditev pristopa, ki je bil uporabljen v prejšnjih primerih za oceno združljivosti obravnavanega ukrepa in upoštevanje posebnosti pokojninskih sistemov v Združenem kraljestvu.
In the previous cases, the compulsory social security contributions (for example the contribution to the social insurances for pension, health, and unemployment) were used as a benchmark but this is not appropriate in the current case.
V prejšnjih primerih so bili obvezni prispevki za socialno varnost (na primer prispevek v socialno zavarovanje za pokojnine, zdravstveno varstvo in za primer brezposelnosti) uporabljeni kot merilo, vendar to v obravnavanem primeru ni primerno.
First, as RMG bears — apart from the pension costs — the same level of costs as competitors for the other social insurances (for example the financing terms for health and unemployment insurances do not differ from those of competitors), the benchmarking has to be carried out with regard to the funding of pension’s liabilities.
Prvič, ker skupina RMG, poleg stroškov pokojnin, krije enako stopnjo stroškov kot konkurenti za druga socialna zavarovanja (na primer, pogoji financiranja za zdravstveno varstvo in za primer brezposelnosti se ne razlikujejo od tistih, ki veljajo za konkurente), je treba izvesti primerjalno analizo glede financiranja pokojninskih obveznosti.
It has to be ensured that RMG is placed in the same position as competitors in respect of their obligations as regards the financing of pension funds.
Treba je zagotoviti, da je skupina RMG v enakem položaju kot konkurenti glede njenih obveznosti financiranja pokojninskih skladov.
Second, in the previous cases, the Commission approved a level of aid such that the postal incumbent’s future social costs were capped at the competitors’ social contribution rates.
Drugič, v prejšnjih primerih je Komisija odobrila tako stopnjo pomoči, da so bili prihodnji socialni stroški uveljavljenih poštnih operaterjev omejeni s stopnjami socialnih prispevkov konkurentov.
The United Kingdom reform does not go that far but leaves RMG the full financial responsibility for any deficit that results from the newly accrued pension rights.
Reforma Združenega kraljestva ne gre tako daleč, temveč pušča skupini RMG polno finančno odgovornost za kakršen koli primanjkljaj, ki izhaja iz novo pridobljenih pokojninskih pravic.
Therefore, the comparison has to be done on the basis of RMG’s accrued pension liabilities at the date of the pension relief on 1 April 2012.
Zato je treba primerjavo opraviti na podlagi nastalih pokojninskih obveznosti RMG na dan prejema pomoči za odpravo pokojninskega primanjkljaja, tj. 1. aprila 2012.
Third, it is not straightforward to find a single benchmark for the level of competitors’ pension costs because the pension benefits offered by the pension funds differ from one company to another.
Tretjič, ni tako enostavno najti enotno merilo za stopnjo stroškov pokojnin konkurentov, saj se pokojninske ugodnosti, ki jih ponujajo pokojninski skladi, od podjetja do podjetja razlikujejo.
Each pension fund has individual arrangements with the sponsoring companies.
Vsak pokojninski sklad ima sklenjene individualne dogovore s podjetji, ki financirajo prispevke.
At most, the comparison can be done based on an average of comparable pension funds.
V najboljšem primeru se primerjava lahko opravi na podlagi povprečja primerljivih pokojninskih skladov.
Therefore, the Commission will assess whether RMG will, as a result of the pension relief, be placed in a comparable situation vis-à-vis its competitors and other UK companies as regards the liability for accrued pension deficits.
Zato bo Komisija ocenila, ali bo skupina RMG zaradi odprave pokojninskega primanjkljaja v položaju, ki je primerljiv z njenimi konkurenti in drugimi podjetji v Združenem kraljestvu glede obveznosti za nastale pokojninske primanjkljaje.
With regard to Deutsche Post’s comment that the assessment should take into account the extent to which pension costs were passed on through increased regulated stamp prices, the Commission has reviewed the UK postal regulator’s pricing decisions.
Glede pripombe družbe Deutsche Post, da bi morala ocena upoštevati, v kolikšni meri so bili stroški pokojnin pokriti z zvišanjem reguliranih cen poštnih znamk, je Komisija pregledala sklepe o oblikovanju cen poštnega regulatorja Združenega kraljestva.
The Commission finds that in the RMG case pension costs were evenly apportioned between the different business segments of RMG according to generally accepted cost allocation principles.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so bili v primeru skupine RMG stroški pokojnin enakomerno porazdeljeni med različnimi poslovnimi segmenti RMG v skladu s splošno sprejetimi načeli razdelitve stroškov.
This means that both the price-regulated as well as the other services in competition have carried an appropriate share of the pension deficit.
To pomeni, da so cenovno regulirane in druge konkurenčne storitve nosile ustrezen delež pokojninskega primanjkljaja.
It is therefore not true that in the RMG case the regulated prices financed a disproportionate share of pension costs for the benefit of the non-price regulated business segments.
Potemtakem ne drži, da se je v primeru RMG z reguliranimi cenami financiral nesorazmeren delež stroškov pokojnin v korist necenovno reguliranih poslovnih segmentov.
The UK postal regulator has ensured that all of RMG’s business segments have equally and proportionally contributed to the financing of the RMPP’s deficit and have not been placed in a better position than competitors.
Poštni regulator Združenega kraljestva je zagotovil, da so vsi poslovni segmenti skupine RMG enako in sorazmerno prispevali k financiranju primanjkljaja sheme RMPP in niso bili v boljšem položaju kot konkurenti.
The Commission will first assess the United Kingdom’s contention that the current deficit of the RMPP can be fully relieved because the amount of liabilities which are due to more generous entitlements that the RMPP offered to its members exceeds the current deficit.
Komisija bo najprej ocenila sporno trditev Združenega kraljestva, da se lahko trenutni primanjkljaj sheme RMPP v celoti odpravi, saj znesek obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz ugodnejših pravic, ki jih je shema RMPP nudila svojim članom, presega trenutni primanjkljaj.
The United Kingdom has submitted a study to support its assertion that the pension deficit has been caused by abnormally high pension liabilities.
Združeno kraljestvo je predložilo študijo v podporo svoji trditvi, da so pokojninski primanjkljaj povzročile nenavadno visoke pokojninske obveznosti.
This study estimates that the level of abnormal liabilities of the Royal Mail scheme is GBP 12,7 billion when compared to the liabilities that would result from a pension fund that offers pension benefits in line with the statutory minimum.
Ta študija ocenjuje, da znaša stopnja nenavadno visokih obveznosti sheme Royal Mail 12,7 milijarde GBP v primerjavi z obveznosti, ki bi izhajale iz pokojninskega sklada, ki ponuja pokojninske ugodnosti v skladu z najnižjo zakonsko določeno stopnjo.
An amount of GBP 6,9 billion of abnormal liabilities results when compared to the UK average pension fund’s liabilities.
Znesek 6,9 milijarde GBP nenavadno visokih obveznosti je rezultat primerjave s povprečnimi obveznostmi za pokojninski sklad v Združenem kraljestvu.
As, in both cases, those liabilities would be higher than the current deficit of GBP 4,5 billion, the United Kingdom claims that a total relief of the pension deficit is justified.
Ker bi bile v obeh primerih te obveznosti večje od sedanjega primanjkljaja v višini 4,5 milijarde GBP, Združeno kraljestvo trdi, da je upravičena oprostitev celotnega pokojninskega primanjkljaja.
First, the Commission refutes the comparison to the statutory minimum because the submitted data on the average UK pension schemes clearly shows that the majority of UK pension schemes offer benefits that go significantly beyond the statutory minimum.
Prvič, Komisija zavrača primerjavo z najnižjo zakonsko določeno stopnjo, saj je iz predloženih podatkov o povprečnih pokojninskih shemah v Združenem kraljestvu jasno razvidno, da večina pokojninskih shem v Združenem kraljestvu ponuja ugodnosti, ki bistveno presegajo najnižjo zakonsko določeno stopnjo.
Second, the Commission considers that the provided comparison to the average pension schemes must be critically reviewed because the different elements of the comparison show different degrees of quality and reliability.
Drugič, Komisija meni, da je treba opravljeno primerjavo s povprečnimi pokojninskimi shemami natančno preučiti, saj različni elementi primerjave izkazujejo različne stopnje kakovosti in zanesljivosti.
(billion GBP)
(milijarde GBP)
Costs relative to average pension scheme
Stroški, ki se nanašajo na povprečno pokojninsko shemo
RMPP’s retirement age of 60 compared to average retirement age of 63,5
Upokojitvena starost 60 let pri shemi RMPP v primerjavi s povprečno upokojitveno starostjo 63,5 let
Redundancy benefits
Nadomestila presežnim zaposlenim
Deferred pension revaluation for employees who left service before 1991
Odloženo prevrednotenje pokojnin za zaposlene, ki so prenehali delati pred letom 1991
Increases to paid-out pensions relating to pre-1997 service
Zvišanja izplačanih pokojnin, ki se nanašajo na službovanje pred letom 1997
The redundancy benefits of GBP 0,5 billion under the RMPP are an unusual feature for private sector schemes and are identified as pension costs that go beyond those of general pension arrangements.
Nadomestila presežnim zaposlenim v višini 0,5 milijarde GBP v okviru sheme RMPP so neobičajna značilnost zasebnih sistemov in so opredeljena kot stroški pokojnin, ki presegajo obveznosti iz splošnih pokojninskih sistemov.
For members of UK pension schemes who left active service prior to 1991, pension schemes are not required to provide inflationary increases on all their benefits in the period between leaving employment and retiring.
Za člane pokojninskih shem Združenega kraljestva, ki so prenehali aktivno delati pred letom 1991, pokojninskim shemam ni treba zagotoviti povečanj v skladu z inflacijo za vse njihove ugodnosti v obdobju med prenehanjem zaposlitve in upokojitvijo.
However, the RMPP does provide inflationary increases on all benefits for such members.
Shema RMPP pa dejansko zagotavlja povečanja v skladu z inflacijo za vse ugodnosti takih članov.
The United Kingdom was not able to provide exact numbers of private sector schemes that also offer deferred pension revaluation for pre-1991 leavers but assures the Commission that a clear majority of schemes do not provide such revaluation.
Združeno kraljestvo ni moglo določiti točnega števila zasebnih shem, ki prav tako ponujajo odloženo prevrednotenje pokojnin za člane, ki so prenehali aktivno delati pred letom 1991, obenem pa Komisiji zagotavlja, da velika večina sistemov očitno ne zagotavlja takega prevrednotenja.
In the calculation of the abnormal liabilities of GBP 1,1 billion, it is assumed without sufficient justification that 75 % of all private sector schemes would not offer such additional benefits.
Pri izračunu nenavadno visokih obveznosti v višini 1,1 milijarde GBP se brez zadostne utemeljitve domneva, da kar 75 % zasebnih shem ne bi zagotovilo takih dodatnih ugodnosti.
Contrary to the RMPP, pensions accrued prior to 1997 are generally not required to increase once retirement benefits have started to be paid to the respective member of the scheme.
V nasprotju s shemo RMPP pa se za pokojninske pravice, nastale pred letom 1997, na splošno ne zahteva povečanje po tem, ko so se članom sheme že začeli izplačevati pokojninski prejemki.
However, 36 % of private sector schemes guarantee increases in line with inflation as does the RMPP.
Kljub temu 36 % zasebnih sistemov zagotavlja povečanja v skladu z inflacijo, kot velja za shemo RMPP.
The other private sector schemes do not offer guaranteed increases in the same magnitude but it was common practice in the past that a majority of those schemes decided at their own discretion increases that came close to the guaranteed increases.
Druge zasebne sheme ne ponujajo zajamčenih povečanj v enakem obsegu, vendar je bila v preteklosti običajna praksa, da se je večina teh shem po svoji presoji odločila za povečanja, ki so bila blizu zajamčenega povečanja.
The United Kingdom’s expert doubts that this practice will continue in the future because also private schemes are now in deficit and may decide to cut back on the discretionary increases.
Strokovnjak Združenega kraljestva dvomi, da se bo ta praksa nadaljevala tudi v prihodnje, saj imajo tudi zasebne sheme trenutno primanjkljaj in se lahko odločijo za omejitev takega povečanja po lastni presoji.
The calculated legacy costs of GBP 1,9 billion depend sensitively on the assumptions about the future behaviour of the private sector schemes and are therefore the least robust estimate out of the four items of legacy costs.
Izračunani pretekli stroški v višini 1,9 milijarde GBP močno temeljijo na domnevah o prihodnjem ravnanju zasebnih shem, zato predstavljajo najmanj grobo oceno od vseh štirih postavk preteklih stroškov.