natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(2)(e) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 78(2)(e) Pogodbe,
A number of substantive changes are to be made to Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national [4].
Potrebnih je več vsebinskih sprememb Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 z dne 18. februarja 2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države [4].
In the interests of clarity, that Regulation should be recast.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba navedeno uredbo prenoviti.
A common policy on asylum, including a Common European Asylum System (CEAS), is a constituent part of the European Union’s objective of progressively establishing an area of freedom, security and justice open to those who, forced by circumstances, legitimately seek protection in the Union.
Skupna azilna politika, vključno s Skupnim evropskim azilnim sistemom, je sestavni del cilja Evropske unije, da se postopno vzpostavi območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, odprto tistim, ki so zaradi okoliščin prisiljeni zakonito iskati zaščito v Uniji.
The European Council, at its special meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, agreed to work towards establishing the CEAS, based on the full and inclusive application of the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (‘the Geneva Convention’), thus ensuring that nobody is sent back to persecution, i.e. maintaining the principle of non-refoulement.
Evropski svet se je na posebnem sestanku v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 dogovoril o delovanju za vzpostavitev Skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema na osnovi celovite in vključujoče uporabe Ženevske konvencije z dne 28. julija 1951 o statusu beguncev, kakor je bila dopolnjena z Newyorškim protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Ženevska konvencija), in s tem za zagotavljanje, da se nikogar ne pošlje nazaj v preganjanje, tj. spoštovanje načela nevračanja.
In this respect, and without the responsibility criteria laid down in this Regulation being affected, Member States, all respecting the principle of non-refoulement, are considered as safe countries for third-country nationals.
V tem smislu in brez vpliva na merila odgovornosti, določena v tej uredbi, se države članice, ki vse spoštujejo načelo nevračanja, štejejo kot varne za državljane tretjih držav.
The Tampere conclusions also stated that the CEAS should include, in the short-term, a clear and workable method for determining the Member State responsible for the examination of an asylum application.
Sklepi iz Tampereja navajajo tudi, da bi moral ta sistem v kratkem času vključevati tudi jasen in izvedljiv način za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil.
Such a method should be based on objective, fair criteria both for the Member States and for the persons concerned.
Tak način bi moral temeljiti na objektivnih, poštenih merilih za zadevne države članice in osebe.
It should, in particular, make it possible to determine rapidly the Member State responsible, so as to guarantee effective access to the procedures for granting international protection and not to compromise the objective of the rapid processing of applications for international protection.
Zlasti bi moral omogočati hitro določitev odgovorne države članice, da bi se zagotovil učinkovit dostop do postopkov za priznanje mednarodne zaščite in ne bi bil ogrožen cilj hitre obravnave prošenj za mednarodno zaščito.
The first phase in the creation of a CEAS that should lead, in the longer term, to a common procedure and a uniform status, valid throughout the Union, for those granted international protection, has now been completed.
Dokončana je prva faza vzpostavitve Skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, ki bi moral dolgoročno voditi k skupnemu postopku in enotnemu statusu za tiste, ki jim je priznana mednarodna zaščita, veljavnemu v vsej Uniji.
In the Stockholm Programme, the European Council reiterated its commitment to the objective of establishing a common area of protection and solidarity in accordance with Article 78 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), for those granted international protection, by 2012 at the latest.
V stockholmskem programu je Evropski svet ponovno potrdil svojo zavezo, da bo najpozneje do leta 2012 v skladu s členom 78 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) vzpostavil skupno območje zaščite in solidarnosti za osebe, ki jim je priznana mednarodna zaščita.
Furthermore it emphasised that the Dublin system remains a cornerstone in building the CEAS, as it clearly allocates responsibility among Member States for the examination of applications for international protection.
Poleg tega je poudaril, da Dublinski sistem ostaja temeljni kamen Skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, saj jasno dodeljuje odgovornost med državami članicami za obravnavo prošenj za mednarodno zaščito.
The resources of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO), established by Regulation (EU) No 439/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], should be available to provide adequate support to the relevant services of the Member States responsible for implementing this Regulation.
Viri Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada (EASO), ki je bil ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 439/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], bi morali biti na voljo za zagotavljanje primerne podpore ustreznim službam držav članic, ki so odgovorne za izvajanje te uredbe.
In particular, EASO should provide solidarity measures, such as the Asylum Intervention Pool with asylum support teams, to assist those Member States which are faced with particular pressure and where applicants for international protection (‘applicants’) cannot benefit from adequate standards, in particular as regards reception and protection.
EASO bi moral zlasti zagotavljati solidarnostne ukrepe, kot je intervencijska skupina za azil s podpornimi skupinami za azil, ki bi pomagale tistim državam članicam, ki se soočajo s posebnim pritiskom in v katerih prosilcem za mednarodno zaščito (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prosilci) niso zagotovljeni ustrezni standardi, zlasti glede sprejema in zaščite.
In the light of the results of the evaluations undertaken of the implementation of the first-phase instruments, it is appropriate, at this stage, to confirm the principles underlying Regulation (EC) No 343/2003, while making the necessary improvements, in the light of experience, to the effectiveness of the Dublin system and the protection granted to applicants under that system.
Ob upoštevanju rezultatov opravljenega ocenjevanja instrumenta prve faze je na tej stopnji primerno potrditi načela, na katerih temelji Uredba (ES) št. 343/2003, hkrati pa na podlagi izkušenj uvesti potrebne izboljšave učinkovitosti Dublinskega sistema ter zaščite, ki se prizna prosilcem po tem sistemu.
Given that a well-functioning Dublin system is essential for the CEAS, its principles and functioning should be reviewed as other components of the CEAS and Union solidarity tools are built up.
Ker je dobro delujoč Dublinski sistem bistvenega pomena za Skupni evropski azilni sistem, bi bilo treba med vzpostavljanjem drugih elementov Skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema in solidarnostnih instrumentov Unije pregledati njegova načela in delovanje.
A comprehensive ‘fitness check’ should be foreseen by conducting an evidence-based review covering the legal, economic and social effects of the Dublin system, including its effects on fundamental rights.
V tej uredbi bi bilo treba določiti izvajanje celovitega pregleda ustreznosti, temelječega na dokazih in ki zajema pravne, ekonomske in socialne učinke Dublinskega sistema, vključno z njegovimi vplivi na temeljne pravice.
In order to ensure equal treatment for all applicants and beneficiaries of international protection, and consistency with the current Union asylum acquis, in particular with Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted [6], the scope of this Regulation encompasses applicants for subsidiary protection and persons eligible for subsidiary protection.
Da bi zagotovili enakopravno obravnavo vseh prosilcev in upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite ter skladnost s sedanjim pravnim redom Unije na področju azila, zlasti z Direktivo 2011/95/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da so upravičeni do mednarodne zaščite, glede enotnega statusa beguncev ali oseb, upravičenih do subsidiarne zaščite, in glede vsebine te zaščite [6], področje uporabe te uredbe zajema prosilce za subsidiarno zaščito in osebe, upravičene do subsidiarne zaščite.
Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection [7] should apply to the procedure for the determination of the Member State responsible as regulated under this Regulation, subject to the limitations in the application of that Directive.
Direktiva 2013/33/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o standardih za sprejem prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito [7] bi se morala uporabljati za postopek določanja odgovorne države članice, kot je določeno v tej uredbi, pri tem pa upoštevati omejitve glede uporabe navedene direktive.
Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection [8] should apply in addition and without prejudice to the provisions concerning the procedural safeguards regulated under this Regulation, subject to the limitations in the application of that Directive.
Direktiva 2013/32/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o skupnih postopkih za priznanje ali odvzem mednarodne zaščite [8] bi se morala uporabljati hkrati in brez poseganja v določbe o postopkovnih zaščitnih ukrepih, ki jih ureja ta uredba, pri tem pa upoštevati omejitve glede uporabe navedene direktive.
In accordance with the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the best interests of the child should be a primary consideration of Member States when applying this Regulation.
V skladu s Konvencijo Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah iz leta 1989 in Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, bi morala biti največja korist otroka primarna skrb držav članic pri uporabi te uredbe.
In assessing the best interests of the child, Member States should, in particular, take due account of the minor’s well-being and social development, safety and security considerations and the views of the minor in accordance with his or her age and maturity, including his or her background.
Pri ugotavljanju, kaj je največja korist otroka, bi morale države članice upoštevati zlasti dobrobit mladoletnika in njegov družbeni razvoj, vprašanja varnosti in zaščite v skladu z njegovo starostjo in zrelostjo, vključno z okoljem, iz katerega prihaja.
In addition, specific procedural guarantees for unaccompanied minors should be laid down on account of their particular vulnerability.
Prav tako bi bilo treba za mladoletnike brez spremstva zaradi njihove posebne ranljivosti določiti posebna postopkovna jamstva.
In accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, respect for family life should be a primary consideration of Member States when applying this Regulation.
V skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, bi moralo biti spoštovanje družinskega življenja primarna skrb držav članic pri uporabi te uredbe.
The processing together of the applications for international protection of the members of one family by a single Member State makes it possible to ensure that the applications are examined thoroughly, the decisions taken in respect of them are consistent and the members of one family are not separated.
Skupna obravnava prošenj za mednarodno zaščito članov ene družine s strani ene same države članice zagotavlja, da se prošnje obravnavajo temeljito, da so odločitve v zvezi z njimi dosledne in da člani ene družine niso ločeni.
In order to ensure full respect for the principle of family unity and for the best interests of the child, the existence of a relationship of dependency between an applicant and his or her child, sibling or parent on account of the applicant’s pregnancy or maternity, state of health or old age, should become a binding responsibility criterion.
Za zagotovitev celovitega spoštovanja načela enotnosti družine in največje koristi otroka bi moral obstoj razmerja odvisnosti med prosilcem in njegovim otrokom, bratom ali sestro ali staršem na podlagi nosečnosti ali materinstva, zdravstvenega stanja ali visoke starosti prosilca, postati zavezujoče merilo odgovornosti.
When the applicant is an unaccompanied minor, the presence of a family member or relative on the territory of another Member State who can take care of him or her should also become a binding responsibility criterion.
Kadar je prosilec mladoletnik brez spremstva, bi morala tudi prisotnost družinskega člana ali sorodnika, ki lahko poskrbi zanj, na ozemlju druge države članice postati zavezujoče merilo odgovornosti.
Any Member State should be able to derogate from the responsibility criteria, in particular on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, in order to bring together family members, relatives or any other family relations and examine an application for international protection lodged with it or with another Member State, even if such examination is not its responsibility under the binding criteria laid down in this Regulation.
Kateri koli državi članici bi moralo biti dovoljeno odstopanje od meril odgovornosti, zlasti iz humanitarnih razlogov in sočutja, da bi omogočili združitev z družinskimi člani, sorodniki ali katerimi koli drugimi svojci ter obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, ki je bila vložena v njej ali v drugi državi članici, tudi če tako obravnavanje ni njena odgovornost glede na zavezujoča merila iz te uredbe.
A personal interview with the applicant should be organised in order to facilitate the determination of the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection.
S prosilcem bi bilo treba organizirati osebni razgovor, ki bi omogočil lažjo določitev odgovorne države članice za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito.
As soon as the application for international protection is lodged, the applicant should be informed of the application of this Regulation and of the possibility, during the interview, of providing information regarding the presence of family members, relatives or any other family relations in the Member States, in order to facilitate the procedure for determining the Member State responsible.
Takoj po vložitvi prošnje za mednarodno zaščito bi bilo treba prosilca obvestiti o uporabi te uredbe in o možnosti, da na razgovoru poda informacije o prisotnosti družinskih članov, sorodnikov ali katerih koli drugih svojcev v državah članicah, da se olajša postopek določanja odgovorne države članice.
In order to guarantee effective protection of the rights of the persons concerned, legal safeguards and the right to an effective remedy in respect of decisions regarding transfers to the Member State responsible should be established, in accordance, in particular, with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Da se zagotovi učinkovita zaščita pravic zadevnih oseb, bi bilo zlasti v skladu s členom 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah treba vzpostaviti pravne zaščitne ukrepe in pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva v zvezi z odločitvijo o predaji v odgovorno državo članico.
In order to ensure that international law is respected, an effective remedy against such decisions should cover both the examination of the application of this Regulation and of the legal and factual situation in the Member State to which the applicant is transferred.
Da se zagotovi spoštovanje mednarodnega prava, bi moralo učinkovito pravno sredstvo proti takim odločitvam obsegati tako preučitev uporabe te uredbe kot tudi pravnega in dejanskega stanja v državi članici, v katero je predan prosilec.
The detention of applicants should be applied in accordance with the underlying principle that a person should not be held in detention for the sole reason that he or she is seeking international protection.
Pridržanje prosilcev bi bilo treba uporabljati v skladu z osnovnim načelom, da se osebe ne bi smelo pridržati samo zato, ker zaprosi za mednarodno zaščito.
Detention should be for as short a period as possible and subject to the principles of necessity and proportionality.
Pridržanje bi moralo trajati čim krajše možno obdobje, zanj pa bi morali veljati načeli nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
In particular, the detention of applicants must be in accordance with Article 31 of the Geneva Convention.
Zlasti mora biti pridržanje prosilcev v skladu s členom 31 Ženevske konvencije.
The procedures provided for under this Regulation in respect of a detained person should be applied as a matter of priority, within the shortest possible deadlines.
Postopki predvideni v tej uredbi v zvezi s pridržano osebo, bi se morali uporabljati prednostno v najkrajšem možnem roku.
As regards the general guarantees governing detention, as well as detention conditions, where appropriate, Member States should apply the provisions of Directive 2013/33/EU also to persons detained on the basis of this Regulation.
Kar zadeva splošna jamstva v zvezi s pridržanjem in pogoje za pridržanje, bi morale države članice, kjer je to ustrezno, določbe Direktive 2013/33/EU uporabljati tudi za osebe, ki so pridržane na podlagi te uredbe.
Deficiencies in, or the collapse of, asylum systems, often aggravated or contributed to by particular pressures on them, can jeopardise the smooth functioning of the system put in place under this Regulation, which could lead to a risk of a violation of the rights of applicants as set out in the Union asylum acquis and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, other international human rights and refugee rights.
Pomanjkljivosti ali razpad azilnih sistemov, ki jih posebni pritiski na te sisteme pogosto še zaostrijo ali pa k njim prispevajo, lahko ogrozijo nemoteno delovanje sistema, vzpostavljenega na podlagi te uredbe, to pa bi lahko povzročilo nevarnost, da bodo kršene pravice prosilcev, kot jih določajo pravni red Unije na področju azila, Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in druge mednarodne obveznosti v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami in pravicami beguncev.
A process for early warning, preparedness and management of asylum crises serving to prevent a deterioration in, or the collapse of, asylum systems, with EASO playing a key role using its powers under Regulation (EU) No 439/2010, should be established in order to ensure robust cooperation within the framework of this Regulation and to develop mutual trust among Member States with respect to asylum policy.
Da bi zagotovili močno sodelovanje v okviru te uredbe in vzpostavili medsebojno zaupanje držav članic v zvezi z azilno politiko, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti postopek za zgodnje opozarjanje in pripravljenost na azilne krize ter njihovo obvladovanje, ki bi bil namenjen preprečevanju poslabšanj ali razpada azilnih sistemov in pri katerem bi imel ključno vlogo EASO v skladu s pristojnostmi, ki jih ima na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 439/2010.
Such a process should ensure that the Union is alerted as soon as possible when there is a concern that the smooth functioning of the system set up by this Regulation is being jeopardised as a result of particular pressure on, and/or deficiencies in, the asylum systems of one or more Member States.
Tak postopek bi moral zagotavljati, da je Unija kar najhitreje obveščena o ogroženosti nemotenega delovanja sistema, vzpostavljenega s to uredbo, zaradi posebnega pritiska na azilne sisteme ene ali več držav članic in/ali njihovih pomanjkljivosti.
Such a process would allow the Union to promote preventive measures at an early stage and pay the appropriate political attention to such situations.
S takim postopkom bi lahko Unija spodbujala preventivne ukrepe že v zgodnji fazi in takim razmeram namenila ustrezno politično pozornost.
Solidarity, which is a pivotal element in the CEAS, goes hand in hand with mutual trust.
Solidarnost, ki je osrednji element Skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, je neločljivo povezana z medsebojnim zaupanjem.
By enhancing such trust, the process for early warning, preparedness and management of asylum crises could improve the steering of concrete measures of genuine and practical solidarity towards Member States, in order to assist the affected Member States in general and the applicants in particular.
Z okrepitvijo takega zaupanja bi lahko postopek za zgodnje opozarjanje in pripravljenost na azilne krize ter njihovo obvladovanje izboljšal usmerjanje konkretnih ukrepov pristne in dejanske solidarnosti s prizadetimi državami članicami in pomagal prizadetim državam članicam na splošno, še posebno pa prosilcem.
In accordance with Article 80 TFEU, Union acts should, whenever necessary, contain appropriate measures to give effect to the principle of solidarity, and the process should be accompanied by such measures.
V skladu s členom 80 PDEU bi morali akti Unije, kadar koli je to potrebno, vsebovati ustrezne ukrepe za uveljavitev načela solidarnosti, in bi postopek morali spremljati taki ukrepi.
The conclusions on a Common Framework for genuine and practical solidarity towards Member States facing particular pressures on their asylum systems, including through mixed migration flows, adopted by the Council on 8 March 2012, provide for a ‘tool box’ of existing and potential new measures, which should be taken into account in the context of a mechanism for early warning, preparedness and crisis management.
Sklepi o skupnem okviru za pristno in dejansko solidarnost z državami članicami, katerih azilni sistemi so pod posebnim pritiskom, vključno zaradi mešanih migracijskih tokov, ki jih je 8. marca 2012 sprejel Svet, predvidevajo „instrumentarij“, v katerem so zbrani obstoječi in možni novi ukrepi, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati v okviru mehanizma za zgodnje opozarjanje, pripravljenost na krize ter njihovo obvladovanje.
Member States should collaborate with EASO in the gathering of information concerning their ability to manage particular pressure on their asylum and reception systems, in particular within the framework of the application of this Regulation.
Države članice bi morale sodelovati z EASO pri zbiranju informacij o njihovi sposobnosti obvladovanja posebnega pritiska na njihov azilni sistem in sistem za sprejem, zlasti v okviru uporabe te uredbe.
EASO should regularly report on the information gathered in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 439/2010.
EASO bi moral v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 439/2010 redno poročati o zbranih informacijah.
In accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 [9], transfers to the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection may be carried out on a voluntary basis, by supervised departure or under escort.
V skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1560/2003 [9] se lahko predaje v odgovorno državo članico za preučitev prošnje za mednarodno zaščito izvedejo prostovoljno, v obliki nadzorovanega odhoda ali v spremstvu.