natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a result, a protection measure ordered in one Member State (‘Member State of origin’) should be treated as if it had been ordered in the Member State where its recognition is sought (‘Member State addressed’).
Zato bi moral biti zaščitni ukrep, odrejen v eni državi članici (v nadaljnjem besedilu: država članica izvora), obravnavan, kot da je bil odrejen v državi članici, v kateri se zahteva njegovo priznanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zaprošena država članica).
In order to attain the objective of free movement of protection measures, it is necessary and appropriate that the rules governing the recognition and, where applicable, enforcement of protection measures be governed by a legal instrument of the Union which is binding and directly applicable.
Za dosego cilja prostega pretoka zaščitnih ukrepov je potrebno in ustrezno, da pravila, ki urejajo priznavanje in, kadar je to primerno, izvrševanje zaščitnih ukrepov, ureja pravni instrument Unije, ki je zavezujoč in se neposredno uporablja.
This Regulation should apply to protection measures ordered with a view to protecting a person where there exist serious grounds for considering that that person’s life, physical or psychological integrity, personal liberty, security or sexual integrity is at risk, for example so as to prevent any form of gender-based violence or violence in close relationships such as physical violence, harassment, sexual aggression, stalking, intimidation or other forms of indirect coercion.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati za zaščitne ukrepe, ki se odredijo za zaščito osebe, kadar obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za bojazen, da so življenje, telesna ali duševna nedotakljivost, osebna svoboda, varnost ali spolna nedotakljivost te osebe ogrožene, recimo tako, da se preprečijo vse oblike nasilja zaradi spola ali nasilja v neposrednem stiku, kot so fizično nasilje, nadlegovanje, spolno nasilje, zalezovanje, ustrahovanje ali druge oblike posredne prisile.
It is important to underline that this Regulation applies to all victims, regardless of whether they are victims of gender-based violence.
Treba je poudariti, da se ta uredba uporablja za vse žrtve, ne glede na to, ali so žrtve nasilja na podlagi spola.
Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime [3] ensures that victims of crime receive appropriate information and support.
Direktiva 2012/29/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o določitvi minimalnih standardov na področju pravic, podpore in zaščite žrtev kaznivih dejanj [3] zagotavlja, da žrtve kaznivih dejanj prejmejo ustrezne informacije in podporo.
This Regulation complements Directive 2012/29/EU.
Ta uredba dopolnjuje Direktivo 2012/29/EU.
The fact that a person is the object of a protection measure ordered in civil matters does not necessarily preclude that person from being defined as a ‘victim’ under that Directive.
Dejstvo, da za osebo velja zaščitni ukrep, odrejen v civilnih zadevah, samo po sebi ne izključuje možnosti opredelitve te osebe kot „žrtve“ v skladu z navedeno direktivo.
The scope of this Regulation is within the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters within the meaning of Article 81 TFEU.
Področje uporabe te uredbe spada v okvir pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah v smislu člena 81 PDEU.
This Regulation applies only to protection measures ordered in civil matters.
Ta uredba se uporablja le za zaščitne ukrepe, odrejene v civilnih zadevah.
Protection measures adopted in criminal matters are covered by Directive 2011/99/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the European Protection Order [4].
Zaščitne ukrepe, sprejete v kazenskih zadevah, zajema Direktiva 2011/99/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o evropski odredbi o zaščiti [4].
The notion of civil matters should be interpreted autonomously, in accordance with the principles of Union law.
Pojem civilne zadeve bi bilo treba razlagati samostojno v skladu z načeli prava Unije.
The civil, administrative or criminal nature of the authority ordering a protection measure should not be determinative for the purpose of assessing the civil character of a protection measure.
Pri odločanju o tem, ali gre za zaščitni ukrep civilne narave, ne bi smelo biti odločilno, ali ga je odredil civilni, upravni ali kazenski organ.
This Regulation should not interfere with the functioning of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility [5] (‘Brussels IIa Regulation’).
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 z dne 27. novembra 2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba Bruselj IIa).
Decisions taken under the Brussels IIa Regulation should continue to be recognised and enforced under that Regulation.
Odločbe, sprejete na podlagi Uredbe Bruselj IIa, bi se morale še naprej priznavati in izvrševati v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
This Regulation takes account of the different legal traditions of the Member States and does not interfere with the national systems for ordering protection measures.
Ta uredba upošteva različne pravne tradicije držav članic in ne posega v nacionalne sisteme za odreditev zaščitnih ukrepov.
This Regulation does not oblige the Member States to modify their national systems so as to enable protection measures to be ordered in civil matters, or to introduce protection measures in civil matters for the application of this Regulation.
Ta uredba držav članic ne zavezuje, da spremenijo svoje nacionalne sisteme, da bi lahko odredile zaščitne ukrepe v civilnih zadevah, in da bi uvedle zaščitne ukrepe v civilnih zadevah za uporabo te uredbe.
In order to take account of the various types of authorities which order protection measures in civil matters in the Member States, and unlike in other areas of judicial cooperation, this Regulation should apply to decisions of both judicial authorities and administrative authorities provided that the latter offer guarantees with regard, in particular, to their impartiality and to the right of the parties to judicial review.
Zaradi upoštevanja različnih vrst organov, ki v državah članicah odrejajo zaščitne ukrepe v civilnih zadevah, in za razliko od drugih področij pravosodnega sodelovanja bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati za odločbe tako sodnih organov kot upravnih organov, pod pogojem, da ti upravni organi zagotavljajo zlasti svojo nepristranskost in pravico strank do sodnega nadzora.
In no event should police authorities be considered as issuing authorities within the meaning of this Regulation.
Policijski organi v nobenem primeru ne bi smeli veljati za organe izdajatelje v smislu te uredbe.
Based on the principle of mutual recognition, protection measures ordered in civil matters in the Member State of origin should be recognised in the Member State addressed as protection measures in civil matters in accordance with this Regulation.
Na podlagi načela vzajemnega priznavanja bi morali biti zaščitni ukrepi, ki se v državi članici izvora odredijo v civilnih zadevah, priznani v zaprošeni državi članici kot zaščitni ukrepi v civilnih zadevah v skladu s to uredbo.
In cases where the duration of a protection measure is greater than 12 months, the limitation of the effects of recognition under this Regulation should be without prejudice to the right of the protected person to invoke that protection measure under any other available legal act of the Union providing for recognition or to apply for a national protection measure in the Member State addressed.
V primerih, ko je obdobje trajanja zaščitnega ukrepa daljše od 12 mesecev, omejitev učinkov priznanja na podlagi te uredbe ne bi smela posegati v pravico zaščitene osebe, da uveljavi ta zaščitni ukrep v okviru katerega koli drugega razpoložljivega pravnega akta Unije, ki zagotavlja priznanje, ali da zaprosi za nacionalni zaščitni ukrep v zaprošeni državi članici.
The limitation of the effects of recognition is exceptional due to the special nature of the subject matter of this Regulation and should not serve as a precedent for other instruments in civil and commercial matters.
Omejitev učinkov priznanja pomeni izjemo zaradi posebne narave predmeta urejanja te uredbe in ne bi smela biti precedens za druge instrumente v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
This Regulation should deal only with the recognition of the obligation imposed by the protection measure.
Ta uredba bi morala urejati le priznavanje obveznosti, naložene z zaščitnim ukrepom.
It should not regulate the procedures for implementation or enforcement of the protection measure, nor should it cover any potential sanctions that might be imposed if the obligation ordered by the protection measure is infringed in the Member State addressed.
Ne bi smela urejati postopkov za izvajanje ali izvrševanje zaščitnega ukrepa in ne bi smela zajemati morebitnih sankcij, ki bi lahko bile naložene, če bi bila v zaprošeni državi članici kršena obveznost, odrejena z zaščitnim ukrepom.
Those matters are left to the law of that Member State.
Navedene zadeve ureja pravo te države članice.
However, in accordance with the general principles of Union law and particularly the principle of mutual recognition, Member States are to ensure that protection measures recognised under this Regulation can take effect in the Member State addressed.
V skladu s splošnimi načeli prava Unije in zlasti z načelom vzajemnega priznavanja pa morajo države članice zagotoviti, da lahko zaščitni ukrepi, priznani v skladu s to uredbo, učinkujejo v zaprošeni državi članici.
Protection measures covered by this Regulation should afford protection to the protected person at his or her place of residence or place of work, or at another place which that person visits on a regular basis, such as the residence of close relatives or the school or educational establishment attended by his or her child.
Zaščitni ukrepi, zajeti v tej uredbi, bi morali zagotavljati zaščito zaščiteni osebi na njenem prebivališču, kraju dela ali drugem kraju, ki ga ta oseba redno obiskuje, kot je prebivališče bližnjih sorodnikov ali šolska ali izobraževalna ustanova, ki jo obiskuje njen otrok.
Irrespective of whether the place in question or the extent of the area covered by the protection measure is described in the protection measure by one or more specific addresses or by reference to a circumscribed area which the person causing the risk may not approach or enter, respectively (or a combination of the two), the recognition of the obligation imposed by the protection measure relates to the purpose which the place serves for the protected person rather than to the specific address.
Ne glede na to, ali sta zadevni kraj ali velikost območja, ki ju zajema zaščitni ukrep, opisana v zaščitnem ukrepu z enim ali več določenimi naslovi ali s sklicevanjem na obseg območja, ki se mu oseba, ki povzroča tveganje, ne sme približati oziroma vanj vstopiti (ali s kombinacijo obeh meril), je priznanje obveznosti, naložene z zaščitnim ukrepom, vezano na namen, ki ga ima ta kraj za zaščiteno osebo, in ne na določen naslov.
In the light of the foregoing and provided that the nature and the essential elements of the protection measure are maintained, the competent authority of the Member State addressed should be allowed to adjust the factual elements of the protection measure where such adjustment is necessary in order for the recognition of the protection measure to be effective in practical terms in the Member State addressed.
Glede na navedeno in pod pogojem, da se ohranijo narava in bistveni elementi zaščitnega ukrepa, bi moral pristojni organ zaprošene države članice imeti možnost, da prilagodi vsebinske elemente zaščitnega ukrepa, če je ta prilagoditev potrebna za to, da priznanje zaščitnega ukrepa v zaprošeni državi članici učinkuje v praksi.
Factual elements include the address, the general location or the minimum distance the person causing the risk must keep from the protected person, the address or the general location.
Vsebinski elementi vključujejo naslov, splošno lokacijo ali najmanjšo razdaljo, ki jo mora oseba, ki povzroča tveganje, vzdrževati do zaščitene osebe, naslova ali splošne lokacije.
However, the type and the civil nature of the protection measure may not be affected by such adjustment.
Taka prilagoditev pa ne sme vplivati na vrsto in civilno naravo zaščitnega ukrepa.
In order to facilitate any adjustment of a protection measure, the certificate should indicate whether the address specified in the protection measure constitutes the place of residence, the place of work or a place that the protected person visits on a regular basis.
Da bi olajšali kakršno koli prilagoditev zaščitnega ukrepa, bi bilo treba v potrdilu navesti, ali gre pri naslovu, navedenem v zaščitnem ukrepu, za naslov prebivališča, kraja dela ali kraja, ki ga zaščitena oseba redno obiskuje.
Furthermore, if relevant, the circumscribed area (approximate radius from the specific address) to which the obligation imposed by the protection measure on the person causing the risk applies should also be indicated in the certificate.
Kadar je to ustrezno, bi moral biti v potrdilu nadalje naveden tudi obseg območja (približni polmer okoli določenega naslova), na katerem velja obveznost, ki je naložena z zaščitnim ukrepom glede osebe, ki povzroča tveganje.
In order to facilitate the free movement of protection measures within the Union, this Regulation should introduce a uniform model of certificate and provide for the establishment of a multilingual standard form for that purpose.
Za lažji prosti pretok zaščitnih ukrepov znotraj Unije bi morala ta uredba uvesti enoten vzorec potrdila in v ta namen zagotoviti vzpostavitev večjezičnega standardnega obrazca.
The issuing authority should issue the certificate upon request by the protected person.
Organ izdajatelj bi moral potrdilo izdati na zahtevo zaščitene osebe.
Free text fields in the multilingual standard form for the certificate should be as limited as possible, so that translation or transliteration may be provided in most cases without imposing any costs on the protected person by making use of the standard form in the relevant language.
Polja za prosto besedilo v večjezičnem standardnem obrazcu potrdila bi morala biti čim bolj omejena, tako da bi bila lahko prevod ali transliteracija v večini primerov zagotovljena brez naložitve kakršnih koli stroškov za zaščiteno osebo, in sicer z uporabo standardnega obrazca v ustreznem jeziku.
Any costs for necessary translation that goes beyond the text of the multilingual standard form are to be allocated as provided under the law of the Member State of origin.
Vsi stroški potrebnega prevoda, ki presega besedilo večjezičnega standardnega obrazca, bi se morali porazdeliti, kot določa pravo države članice izvora.
Where a certificate contains free text, the competent authority of the Member State addressed should determine whether any translation or transliteration is required.
Kadar potrdilo vsebuje prosto besedilo, bi moral pristojni organ zaprošene države članice odločiti, ali je potreben kakršen koli prevod ali transliteracija.
This should not preclude the protected person or the issuing authority of the Member State of origin from providing a translation or transliteration on their own initiative.
To zaščiteni osebi ali organu izdajatelju države članice izvora ne bi smelo preprečevati, da bi prevod ali transliteracijo zagotovil na lastno pobudo.
To ensure respect for the rights of defence of the person causing the risk, where the protection measure was ordered in default of appearance or under a procedure that does not provide for prior notice to that person (‘ex-parte proceeding’), the issue of the certificate should only be possible if that person has had the opportunity to arrange for his or her defence against the protection measure.
Če je bil zaščitni ukrep odrejen v nenavzočnosti osebe, ki povzroča tveganje, ali po postopku, ki ne določa vnaprejšnjega uradnega obveščanja te osebe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: enostranski postopek), se zaradi zagotavljanja spoštovanja pravic do obrambe osebe, ki povzroča tveganje, potrdilo lahko izda le, če je ta oseba imela možnost, da pripravi svojo obrambo v zvezi z zaščitnim ukrepom.
However, with a view to avoiding circumvention and taking into account the typical urgency of cases necessitating protection measures, it should not be required that the period for raising such defence has expired before a certificate may be issued.
Zaradi preprečitve izogibanja in ob upoštevanju običajne nujnosti zadev, v katerih so potrebni zaščitni ukrepi, pa ne bi smelo biti nujno, da se rok za uveljavljanje take obrambe izteče, preden se potrdilo lahko izda.
The certificate should be issued as soon as the protection measure is enforceable in the Member State of origin.
Potrdilo bi moralo biti izdano takoj, ko je zaščitni ukrep izvršljiv v državi članici izvora.
Having regard to the objectives of simplicity and speed, this Regulation provides for simple and quick methods to be used for bringing procedural steps to the notice of the person causing the risk.
Ta uredba ob upoštevanju cilja preprostosti in hitrosti določa uporabo preprostih in hitrih metod uradnega obveščanja osebe, ki povzroča tveganje, s stopnjami postopka.
Those specific methods of notification should apply only for the purposes of this Regulation due to the special nature of its subject matter, should not serve as a precedent for other instruments in civil and commercial matters and should not affect any obligations of a Member State concerning the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil matters arising from a bilateral or multilateral convention concluded between that Member State and a third country.
Te posebne metode uradnega obveščanja bi se morale uporabljati le za namene te uredbe zaradi posebne narave njenega predmeta urejanja in ne bi smele pomeniti precedensa za druge instrumente v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ter ne bi smele vplivati na katere koli obveznosti države članice v zvezi z vročanjem sodnih in izvensodnih dokumentov v civilnih zadevah v tujini, ki izhajajo iz dvostranskih ali večstranskih dogovorov, sklenjenih med to državo članico in tretjo državo.
When the certificate is brought to the notice of the person causing the risk and also when any adjustment is made to any factual elements of a protection measure in the Member State addressed, due regard should be paid to the interest of the protected person in not having his or her whereabouts or other contact details disclosed.
Pri uradnem obveščanju osebe, ki povzroča tveganje, o potrdilu, pa tudi pri kakršnem koli prilagajanju katerih koli vsebinskih elementov zaščitnega ukrepa v zaprošeni državi članici bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati interes zaščitene osebe, da se ne razkrijejo njeno bivališče ali drugi kontaktni podatki.
Such details should not be disclosed to the person causing the risk unless such disclosure is necessary for compliance with, or the enforcement of, the protection measure.
Taki podatki se osebi, ki povzroča tveganje, ne bi smeli razkriti, razen če je tako razkritje potrebno za izpolnitev ali izvrševanje zaščitnega ukrepa.
The issuing of the certificate should not be subject to appeal.
Zoper izdajo potrdila ne bi smelo biti pritožbe.
The certificate should be rectified where, due to an obvious error or inaccuracy, such as a typing error or an error of transcription or copying, the certificate does not correctly reflect the protection measure, or should be withdrawn if it was clearly wrongly granted, for example where it was used for a measure that falls outside the scope of this Regulation or where it was issued in breach of the requirements for its issuing.
Potrdilo bi bilo treba popraviti, če zaradi očitne napake ali nenatančnosti, kot je tipkarska napaka, ali napaka, nastala pri prepisovanju ali kopiranju, potrdilo ne odraža pravilno zaščitnega ukrepa, ali bi ga bilo treba preklicati, če je bilo očitno neupravičeno odobreno, na primer kadar se uporablja za ukrep, ki ne spada na področje uporabe te uredbe, ali kadar so bile pri njegovi izdaji kršene zahteve za njegovo izdajo.
The issuing authority of the Member State of origin should, upon request, assist the protected person in obtaining information on the authorities of the Member State addressed before which the protection measure is to be invoked or enforcement is to be sought.
Organ izdajatelj države članice izvora bi moral zaščiteni osebi na zahtevo pomagati pridobiti informacije o organih zaprošene države članice, pred katerimi se lahko uveljavlja zaščitni ukrep ali zahteva izvršitev.
The harmonious functioning of justice requires that irreconcilable decisions should not be delivered in two Member States.
Zaradi usklajenega delovanja pravosodja bi bilo treba preprečiti, da bi bile v dveh državah članicah izdane nezdružljive odločbe.
To that end, this Regulation should provide for a ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement of the protection measure in cases of irreconcilability with a judgment given or recognised in the Member State addressed.
Ta uredba bi zato morala določati možnost zavrnitve priznanja ali izvrševanja zaščitnega ukrepa v primeru nezdružljivosti s sodbo, izdano ali priznano v zaprošeni državi članici.
Public interest considerations may, in exceptional circumstances, justify a refusal by the court of the Member State addressed to recognise or enforce a protection measure where its application would be manifestly incompatible with the public policy of that Member State.
V izjemnih primerih bi lahko bilo zaradi javnega interesa upravičeno, da bi sodišča v zaprošenih državah članicah utemeljila zavrnitev priznanja ali izvršitve zaščitnega ukrepa, če bi bila njegova uporaba očitno nezdružljiva z javnim redom te države članice.
However, the court should not be able to apply the public-policy exception in order to refuse recognition or enforcement of a protection measure when to do so would be contrary to the rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21 thereof.
Sodišča pa kljub temu ne bi smela imeti možnosti uporabe izjeme javnega reda, da bi zavrnila priznanje ali izvršitev zaščitnega ukrepa, če bi bilo to v nasprotju s pravicami iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in zlasti členom 21 navedene listine.
In the event of suspension or withdrawal of the protection measure or withdrawal of the certificate in the Member State of origin, the competent authority of the Member State addressed should, upon submission of the relevant certificate, suspend or withdraw the effects of recognition and, where applicable, the enforcement of the protection measure.
Če je v državi članici izvora zaščitni ukrep odložen ali preklican ali je preklicano potrdilo, bi moral pristojni organ zaprošene države članice na podlagi predložitve zadevnega potrdila odložiti ali preklicati učinke priznanja in, kadar je to primerno, izvršitev zaščitnega ukrepa.
A protected person should have effective access to justice in other Member States.
Zaščitena oseba bi morala imeti učinkovit dostop do pravice v drugih državah članicah.
To ensure such effective access in procedures covered by this Regulation, legal aid is to be provided in accordance with Council Directive 2003/8/EC of 27 January 2003 to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes [6].
Da bi takšen učinkovit dostop zagotovili v postopkih, ki jih zajema ta uredba, se mora pravna pomoč zagotoviti v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2003/8/ES z dne 27. januarja 2003 o izboljšanju dostopa do pravnega varstva v čezmejnih sporih z uvedbo minimalnih skupnih pravil v zvezi s pravno pomočjo pri takih sporih [6].