natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By way of derogation from points (a) and (b) of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 967/2006, Member States shall communicate to the Commission not later than 1 September 2013, the quantities of beet and cane sugar that are to be carried forward, from the 2012/13 marketing year to the next marketing year.
Z odstopanjem od točk (a) in (b) člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 967/2006 države članice najpozneje 1. septembra 2013 Komisiji sporočijo količine sladkorja iz sladkorne pese in sladkornega trsa iz tržnega leta 2012/2013, ki se prenesejo v naslednje tržno leto.
OJ L 99, 9.4.2013, p. 13.
UL L 99, 9.4.2013, str. 13.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 330/2013
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 16(4) and 24(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 16(4) in člena 24(5) Uredbe,
On 10 November 2012, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (‘the countries concerned’) following a complaint lodged on 26 September 2012 by the European Biodiesel Board (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of biodiesel.
Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 10. novembra 2012 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], („obvestilo o začetku“) napovedala začetek protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije („zadevni državi“) na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 26. septembra 2012 vložil Evropski odbor za biodizel („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje biodizla v Uniji.
The product concerned by this registration is the same as that defined in the notice of initiation, i.e. fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend, currently falling within CN codes ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097, 38260010 and ex38260090, and originating in the countries concerned.
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta registracija, je enak izdelku, opredeljenem v obvestilu o začetku, tj. monoalkilni estri maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinska plinska olja nefosilnega izvora, pridobljeni s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, v čisti obliki ali mešanici, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097, 38260010 in ex38260090 ter s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije.
Following the publication of the notice of initiation, the complainant requested in December 2012 that imports of the product concerned are made subject to registration pursuant to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Po objavi obvestila o začetku je pritožnik decembra 2012 zahteval, da se na podlagi člena 24(5) osnovne uredbe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka uvede obvezna registracija, da se od datuma take registracije proti navedenemu uvozu lahko uporabijo ukrepi.
According to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission may, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom carinskim organom odredi, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza, da se proti navedenemu uvozu od datuma take registracije lahko uporabijo ukrepi.
The complainant claimed that registration is justified as the product concerned was being subsidised and injury to the Union industry, which is difficult to repair, was caused by the surge in subsidised imports in a relatively short period of time.
Pritožnik je trdil, da je registracija upravičena, ker je bil zadevni izdelek subvencioniran in je bila z nenadnim porastom dampinškega uvoza v relativno kratkem času industriji Unije povzročena škoda.
The Commission has at its disposal sufficient prima facie evidence that imports of the product concerned from the countries concerned are being subsidised.
Komisiji so na voljo zadostni dokazi prima facie, da se zadevni izdelek iz zadevnih držav uvaža po subvencioniranih cenah.
In the anti-subsidy complaint the Union industry provided evidence that the product concerned is being subsidised in both countries concerned through a system of Differential Export Taxation.
Industrija Unije je v protisubvencijski pritožbi predložila dokaze, da je zadevni izdelek v Argentini in Indoneziji subvencioniran prek sistema diferencirane obdavčitve izvoza.
In both countries concerned an export tax is charged on the raw material, at rates which are higher than those charged on the export of biodiesel.
Pri obeh zadevnih državah se izvozne dajatve za surovine zaračunavajo po višjih stopnjah kot za izvoz biodizla.
This approach effectively obliges the producers of the raw material to sell on the domestic market, thus depressing prices and artificially reducing the costs of the biodiesel producers.
Ta pristop dejansko sili proizvajalce surovin k njihovi prodaji na domačem trgu, kar znižuje cene in umetno zmanjšuje stroške proizvajalcev biodizla.
The evidence in the complaint provides sufficient support at this stage that the exporters in question are being subsidised in their exports of biodiesel.
Dokazi iz pritožbe na tej stopnji zadostno kažejo na to, da se biodizel zadevnih izvoznikov izvaža po subvencioniranih cenah.
As regards injury, the Commission has at its disposal sufficient prima facie evidence that the exporting producers’ subsidisation is causing material injury to the Union industry, which is difficult to repair.
Kar zadeva škodo, so Komisiji na voljo zadostni dokazi prima facie, da subvencioniranje proizvajalcev izvoznikov industriji Unije povzroča znatno škodo, ki jo je težko odpraviti.
This evidence consists of detailed data, contained in the anti-subsidy complaint and request for registration and supported by information from the industry and public sources, concerning the key injury factors set out in Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation.
Ti dokazi so podrobni podatki o ključnih dejavnikih škode iz člena 8(5) osnovne uredbe, ki jih vsebujeta protisubvencijska pritožba in zahtevek za registracijo ter potrjujejo informacije iz industrije in javnih virov.
The request also provides sufficient evidence of critical circumstances where, for the subsidised product in question, injury, which is difficult to repair, is caused by massive imports benefiting from countervailable subsidies in a relatively short period of time.
Zahtevek vsebuje tudi zadostne dokaze o kritičnih okoliščinah, v katerih se zadevnemu subvencioniranemu izdelku povzroča škoda, ki jo je težko odpraviti, zaradi velike količine v sorazmerno kratkem času uvoženega izdelka, za katerega se uporabljajo subvencije, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
The level of imports of biodiesel from the countries concerned reaches a peak during spring and summer as, due to its physical and chemical properties, the use of these products is limited when temperatures are low.
Uvoz biodizla iz Argentine in Indonezije doseže največji obseg spomladi in poleti, saj je zaradi njegovih fizikalnih in kemičnih lastnosti njegova uporaba pri nizkih temperaturah omejena.
In view of the above, it may be necessary, in order to preclude the recurrence of such injury, to assess countervailing duties, if any, retroactively on those imports.
Glede na navedeno je za preprečitev ponavljanja take škode morda potrebno retroaktivno oceniti morebitne izravnalne dajatve za ta uvoz.
In view of the above, the Commission has concluded that the complainant provided sufficient evidence to justify making imports of the product concerned subject to registration in accordance with Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na navedeno sklenila, da je pritožnik predložil zadostne dokaze, ki upravičujejo obvezno registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product concerned should be made subject to registration in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings leading to the imposition of anti-subsidy duties, those duties should, if the necessary conditions are fulfilled, be levied retroactively in accordance with applicable legal provisions.
V skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba uvoz zadevnega izdelka registrirati, da bi v primeru, če bodo rezultati preiskave privedli do uvedbe protisubvencijskih dajatev, navedene dajatve obračunavali za nazaj v skladu z veljavnimi pravnimi predpisi, če so izpolnjeni potrebni pogoji.
The allegations in the complaint requesting the initiation of an investigation mentions subsidy margins of 18 % for Indonesia, and 30 % for Argentina, and injury margins between 28,5 and 29,5 % for Argentina and between 35,5 and 37,5 % for Indonesia.
Pritožba, v kateri se zahteva začetek preiskave, navaja stopnjo subvencije 18 % za Indonezijo in 30 % za Argentino ter stopnjo škode med 28,5 % in 29,5 % za Argentino in med 35,5 % in 37,5 % za Indonezijo.
In order that the registration is sufficiently effective in view of eventual retroactive levying of an anti-subsidy duty, the declarant should indicate on the customs declaration the proportion in blends, by weight, of the total content of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and of paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin (biodiesel content).
Za zagotovitev zadostne učinkovitosti registracije glede na morebitni retroaktivni obračun protisubvencijske dajatve bi moral deklarant na carinski deklaraciji navesti masni delež skupne vsebnosti monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in parafinskih plinskih olj nefosilnega izvora, pridobljenih s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, v mešanici (vsebnost biodizla).
The Customs authorities shall, pursuant to Article 24(5) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009, take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend, currently falling within CN codes ex15162098 (TARIC codes 1516209821, 1516209829 and 1516209830), ex15180091 (TARIC codes 1518009121, 1518009129 and 1518009130), ex15180095 (TARIC code 1518009510), ex15180099 (TARIC codes 1518009921, 1518009929 and 1518009930), ex27101943 (TARIC codes 2710194321, 2710194329 and 2710194330), ex27101946 (TARIC codes 2710194621, 2710194629 and 2710194630), ex27101947 (TARIC codes 2710194721, 2710194729 and 2710194730), 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097 (TARIC codes 3824909701, 3824909703 and 3824909704), 38260010 and ex38260090 (TARIC codes 3826009011, 3826009019 and 3826009030), and originating in Argentina and Indonesia.
Carinski organi v skladu s členom 24(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 597/2009 sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza v Unijo monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinskih plinskih olj nefosilnega izvora, pridobljenih s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem,v čisti obliki ali mešanici, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex15162098 (oznake TARIC 1516209821, 1516209829 in 1516209830), ex15180091 (oznake TARIC 1518009121, 1518009129 in 1518009130), ex15180095 (oznaka TARIC 1518009510), ex15180099 (oznake TARIC 1518009921, 1518009929 in 1518009930), ex27101943 (oznake TARIC 2710194321, 2710194329 in 2710194330), ex27101946 (oznake TARIC 2710194621, 2710194629 in 2710194630), ex27101947 (oznake TARIC 2710194721, 2710194729 in 2710194730), 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097 (oznake TARIC 3824909701, 3824909703 in 3824909704), 38260010 in ex38260090 (oznake TARIC 3826009011, 3826009019 in 3826009030) ter s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije.
The declarant shall indicate on the customs declaration the proportion in the blend, by weight, of the total content of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and of paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin (biodiesel content).
Deklarant na carinski deklaraciji navede masni delež skupne vsebnosti monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in parafinskih plinskih olj nefosilnega izvora, pridobljenih s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, v mešanici (vsebnost biodizla).
OJ C 342, 10.11.2012, p. 12.
UL C 342, 10.11.2012, str. 12.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 331/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 331/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 332/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 332/2013
Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 281/2013 of 22 March 2013 laying down exceptional measures as regards the release of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose on the Union market at reduced surplus levy during the 2012/2013 marketing year [2], and in particular Article 5 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 281/2013 z dne 22. marca 2013 o posebnih ukrepih glede dajanja izvenkvotnega sladkorja in izoglukoze na trg Unije z znižanimi presežnimi dajatvami v tržnem letu 2012/2013 [2] ter zlasti člena 5 Uredbe,
The quantities covered by certificate applications for out-of-quota sugar submitted from 26 March 2013 to 3 April 2013 and notified to the Commission from 3 April 2013 to 5 April 2013 exceed the limit set in Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 281/2013.
Količine, zajete v vlogah za dovoljenja za izvenkvotni sladkor, predloženih od 26. marca 2013 do 3. aprila 2013 in sporočenih Komisiji od 3. aprila 2013 do 5. aprila 2013 presegajo mejo, določeno v členu 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 281/2013.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 5 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 281/2013 it is necessary to fix an allocation coefficient, which the Member States shall apply to the quantities covered by each notified certificate application.
Zato je v skladu s členom 5 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 281/2013 treba določiti dodelitveni koeficient, ki ga države članice upoštevajo pri vseh sporočenih vlogah za izdajo dovoljenja.
The quantities for which certificates applications for out-of-quota sugar have been submitted in accordance with Implementing Regulation (EU) No 281/2013 from 26 March 2013 to 3 April 2013 and notified to the Commission from 3 April 2013 to 5 April 2013 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 13,214811 %.
Količine, za katere je bilo zaprošeno v vlogah za dovoljenja za izvenkvotni sladkor, predloženih v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 281/2013 od 26. marca 2013 do 3. aprila 2013 in sporočenih Komisiji od 3. aprila 2013 do 5. aprila 2013, se pomnožijo z dodelitvenim koeficientom 13,214811 %.
OJ L 84, 23.3.2013, p. 19.
UL L 84, 23.3.2013, str. 19.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 333/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 333/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 334/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 334/2013
of 11 April 2013
z dne 11. aprila 2013
Done at Brussels, 11 April 2013.
V Bruslju, 11. aprila 2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 335/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 335/2013
of 12 April 2013
z dne 12. aprila 2013
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 [2] lays down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1974/2006 [2] določa podrobna pravila za uporabo Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
On 12 October 2011 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) [3].
Komisija je 12. oktobra 2011 sprejela predlog za uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) [3].
That proposal introduces a new strategy for rural development based on the policy options outlined in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on ‘The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future’ [4] and on the wide-ranging discussion that followed it.
Ta predlog uvaja novo strategijo za razvoj podeželja, ki temelji na možnosti politike, poudarjeni v sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom „Skupna kmetijska politika proti letu 2020: odziv na prihodnje izzive, povezane s hrano, naravnimi viri in ozemljem“ [4], in na obsežni razpravi, ki mu je sledila.
When adopted, the proposal will bring substantial changes to rural development policy, in particular with regard to the content of a number of measures provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and included in the rural development programmes of the Member States.
Ko bo predlog sprejet, bo prinesel velike spremembe politike razvoja podeželja, zlasti glede vsebine številnih ukrepov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 in programov za razvoj podeželja držav članic.
It is important to ensure that the EAFRD resources of the programming period following the 2007-13 programming period are devoted, as far as possible, to implement that new strategy for rural development.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da so sredstva EKSRP programskega obdobja po programskem obdobju 2007–2013 kolikor je mogoče namenjena za izvajanje nove strategije za razvoj podeželja.
A period of overlapping application of rural development programmes and the corresponding legal provisions of the 2007-13 programming period and those of the programming period following it is inevitable.
Obdobje prekrivanja uporabe programov razvoja podeželja in ustreznih pravnih določb za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 in tistih v sledečem programskem obdobju je neizogibno.
Consequently, provision should be made to ensure that measures established under the 2007-13 programming period are applied under such conditions that they do not take up a disproportionate share of the financial resources of the following programming period.
Zato bi bilo treba pripraviti določbe za zagotovitev, da se ukrepi, določeni v programskem obdobju 2007–2013, uporabljajo pod takšnimi pogoji, da ne bodo porabili nesorazmerno velikega deleža finančnih sredstev za naslednje programsko obdobje.
It should therefore be provided that Member States should not undertake new legal commitments to beneficiaries for multiannual measures which may extend well into the following programming period and which, as a result of the new strategy for rural development, are likely to be discontinued or substantially modified.
Zato je treba določiti, da države članice ne bi smele prevzemati novih pravnih obveznosti do upravičencev za večletne ukrepe, ki lahko segajo v naslednje programsko obdobje in se kot posledica nove strategije za razvoj podeželja verjetno ne bodo nadaljevali ali bodo znatno spremenjeni.
As the end of the 2007-13 programming period approaches, the procedural burden for Member States making changes to rural development programmes should be reduced, while maintaining an appropriate level of assessment by the Commission.
Ker se približuje konec programskega obdobja 2007–2013, je treba zmanjšati postopkovno obremenitev za države članice, ki spreminjajo programe za razvoj podeželja, pri tem pa ohraniti ustrezno raven ocenjevanja s strani Komisije.
Therefore, Member States should have enhanced possibilities to transfer, in a timely manner, and by a notification procedure, amounts from certain measures for which there will be no more need for those amounts to other measures.
Zato bi morale imeti države članice večje možnosti za pravočasen prenos zneskov z nekaterih ukrepov, za katere ne bo več potrebe po teh zneskih, na druge ukrepe s postopkom priglasitve.
The flexibility threshold for transfers among axes should thus be increased.
Zato je treba povišati prag prožnosti za prerazporeditve med osmi.
It is important to ensure continuity in implementing rural development policy and a smooth passage from one programming period to the following programming period.
Pomembno je, da se zagotovi kontinuiteta pri izvajanju politike razvoja podeželja in nemoten prehod iz enega programskega obdobja v naslednje programsko obdobje.
Consequently, it should be specified that expenditure relating to the ex-ante evaluations of new programmes and preparatory costs for the development of local development strategies for the programming period following the 2007-13 programming period are part of the preparation activities to be financed through technical assistance.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti, da so izdatki, ki se nanašajo na predhodna vrednotenja novih programov, in pripravljalni stroški za razvoj lokalnih razvojnih strategij za programsko obdobje po programskem obdobju 2007–2013 del pripravljalnih dejavnosti, ki se financirajo prek tehnične pomoči.
Furthermore, it should be possible to finance other preparatory activities if they are directly linked to the activities of the current rural development programmes and are necessary to ensure continuity and a smooth passage from one programming period to the following programming period.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba omogočiti financiranje drugih pripravljalnih dejavnosti, če so neposredno povezane z dejavnostmi obstoječih programov razvoja podeželja in so potrebne za zagotovitev kontinuitete in nemotenega prehoda iz enega programskega obdobja v naslednje programsko obdobje.
When Member States have already used up their 2007-13 programming period resources for a particular programme and/or measure, they should not undertake new legal commitments to beneficiaries of that programme and/or measure.
Če so države članice svoja sredstva, predvidena za programsko obdobje 2007–2013, že porabile za posamezni program in/ali ukrep, ne bi smele prevzemati novih pravnih obveznosti do upravičencev tega programa in/ali ukrepa.
Furthermore, clear cut-off dates should be provided for undertaking legal commitments to beneficiaries under the 2007-13 programming period and the following programming period.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba določiti natančne roke za prevzemanje novih pravnih obveznosti do upravičencev v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 in za naslednja programska obdobja.
Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 1974/2006 ustrezno spremeniti.
in paragraphs (2) and (4) of Article 9, ‘1 %’ is replaced by ‘3 %’;
v členu 9(2) in členu 9(4) se „1 %“ nadomesti s „3 %“;
in Article 14, the following paragraph 5 is added:
v členu 14 se doda naslednji odstavek 5:
No new legal commitments to beneficiaries shall be undertaken pursuant to Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 after 31 December 2013.’;
V skladu s členom 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 se ne prevzemajo nikakršne nove pravne obveznosti do upravičencev po 31. decembru 2013.“;
in Article 21, the following paragraph 3 is added:
v členu 21 se doda naslednji odstavek 3:
No new legal commitments to beneficiaries shall be undertaken pursuant to Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 after 31 December 2013.’;
V skladu s členom 31 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 se ne prevzemajo nikakršne nove pravne obveznosti do upravičencev po 31. decembru 2013.“;
in the second subparagraph of Article 27(12), ‘2013’ is replaced by ‘2014’;
v drugem pododstavku člena 27(12) se „2013“ nadomesti z „2014“;
in Article 31, the following paragraph 5 is added:
v členu 31 se doda naslednji odstavek 5: