natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards the argument concerning the retroactive remedy of the breach of rights of defence (recital 68) the Commission considers that as a consequence of the judgement of the General Court, the investigation has been reopened at the point where the illegality occurred.
V zvezi s trditvijo o retroaktivni odpravi kršitve pravic do obrambe (uvodna izjava 68) Komisija meni, da je bila zaradi sodbe Splošnega sodišča obnovljena preiskava v času, ko je nastala nezakonitost.
The parties have now a possibility to exercise their rights to the extent they were prevented from doing as established by the General Court.
Stranke imajo zdaj možnost uresničevati svoje pravice, če niso mogle ravnati, kot je določilo Splošno sodišče.
Furthermore, the duties will be imposed only for the future.
Poleg tega bodo dajatve določene samo za naprej.
Against this background the Commission considers that there is no issue of retroactive remedy as claimed by the parties and this argument of the parties has to be therefore dismissed.
Komisija glede na to meni, da vprašanja retroaktivnosti, kot ga predstavljajo stranke, ni, in da je zato treba to trditev strani zavreči.
As regards the argument concerning the inadequate statement of reasons (recital 69), the very purpose of the reopening is to remedy the lack of reasoning and to base the new legal act on a complete statement of reasons.
V zvezi s trditvijo o neustrezni obrazložitvi (uvodna izjava 69), je namen obnove odpraviti pomanjkljivost obrazložitve in utemeljiti novi pravni akt na popolni obrazložitvi.
It is therefore considered that this argument of the parties is addressed.
Zato se šteje, da se ta trditev strani obravnava.
In respect of the scope of the judgment (recital 72) the purpose of the reopening is to establish the appropriate level of trade, and in particular to clarify why the post-importation cost adjustment of the CIF export price was necessary to ensure that the comparison of the export price and of the Union industry price was done at the same level of trade.
V zvezi z obsegom sodbe (uvodna izjava 72) je namen obnove določiti ustrezno raven trgovine, zlasti pa pojasniti, zakaj je bila potrebna prilagoditev stroškov po uvozu za CIF izvozno ceno, da bi zagotovili, da je bila primerjava izvozne cene in cene industrije Unije opravljena na enaki ravni trgovine.
The argument of the parties has to be, therefore, dismissed.
Trditev strani je torej treba zavreči.
As regards the claims concerning the deficiency of the disclosure document of 5 December 2011 in respect of the explanation of level of trade applied in this case (in particular, recitals 73 to 76), the parties were provided with additional information and explanation at several occasions, namely in points 4 and 5 of the disclosure document of 5 December 2011 as well as during the hearings of 29 February 2012.
V zvezi s trditvami o pomanjkljivosti dokumenta o razkritju z dne 5. decembra 2011 o razlagi ravni trgovine, ki se uporablja v tem primeru (zlasti uvodne izjave 73 do 76), so stranke večkrat prejele dodatne informacije in pojasnila, in sicer v točkah 4 in 5 dokumenta o razkritju z dne 5. decembra 2011 in na zaslišanjih dne 29. februarja 2012.
For the sake of full clarity on this point, the findings concerning the level of trade are summarised as follows:
Zaradi jasnosti v zvezi s to točko so ugotovitve v zvezi z ravnjo trgovine povzete:
The investigation showed that the canned mandarins are only produced in one Spanish region (Valencia) and are mainly sold in Germany and United Kingdom.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se mandarine v pločevinkah proizvajajo v samo eni španski regiji (Valencija) in se prodajajo zlasti v Nemčiji in Združenem kraljestvu.
The proportion of Union sales to Germany and United Kingdom was established to represent 62 % of the total Union sales.
Delež prodaje Unije v Nemčijo in v Združeno kraljestvo je bil določen na 62 % celotne prodaje Unije.
On the basis of the verified data it was established that during the IP the Union producers and the Chinese exporters sold essentially to the same customers, i.e. to traders or distributors.
Na podlagi preverjenih podatkov je bilo ugotovljeno, da so v OP proizvajalci Unije in kitajski izvozniki prodajali v bistvu istim strankam, in sicer trgovcem ali distributerjem.
For these reasons, the price comparison between the imports from the exporting producers and the sales of the Union producers was made for the exporting producers at frontier level (CIF) and for the Union producers at factory level (ex-works) adjusted to the importers’ warehouses.
Zaradi tega je bila primerjava cen med uvozom od proizvajalcev izvoznikov in prodajo proizvajalcev Unije pripravljena za proizvajalce izvoznike na ravni meja (CIF) in za proizvajalce Unije na ravni tovarne (franko tovarna), prilagojena za skladišča uvoznikov.
This methodology required the following adjustments:
Ta metodologija je zahtevala naslednje prilagoditve:
on the one hand, a post-importation costs adjustment of the Chinese CIF export prices to bring the goods from the port to the importers’ warehouses;
na eni strani prilagoditev stroškov po uvozu za kitajske CIF izvozne cene, da pride blago iz pristanišča v skladišče uvoznika;
This freight adjustment was calculated based on the established transport costs from Valencia to Hamburg.
Ta prilagoditev za prevoz je bila izračunana na podlagi ugotovljenih stroškov prevoza od Valencije do Hamburga.
Given that not all sales of Union producers were delivered to Germany and United Kingdom, this average was lowered in proportion of the share of sales to Germany and United Kingdom (62 %) and in proportion of direct sales.
Ker vsa prodaja proizvajalcev Unije ni bila dostavljena v Nemčijo in Združeno kraljestvo, je bilo to povprečje znižano sorazmerno z deležem prodaje v Nemčijo in Združeno kraljestvo (62 %) in deležem neposredne prodaje.
As regards the proportion of direct sales of the Union producers, it has been in a range of between 2 % and 12 % during the IP.
Delež direktne prodaje proizvajalcev Unije je v OP znašal od 2 % do 12 %.
The precise percentage cannot be disclosed for confidentiality reasons.
Natančnega deleža ni mogoče razkriti zaradi zaupnosti.
Furthermore, it was argued that a differentiated approach in determination of the appropriate level of trade in respect of the direct sales of the Union producers (recital 72) should have been developed.
Poleg tega so strani trdile, da bi bilo treba za določitev ustrezne ravni trgovine za neposredno prodajo proizvajalcev Unije (uvodna izjava 72) razviti različen pristop.
In this respect it is to be noted that based on the verified findings none of the Chinese imports were sold directly during the IP.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da na podlagi preverjenih ugotovitev v OP noben uvoz iz Kitajske ni bil prodan neposredno.
Since there were not matching direct sales on the side of the Chinese exports, it was not possible to develop a differentiated approach for establishing a level of trade for the proportion of direct sales of Union producers.
Ker na strani kitajskega izvoza ni bilo ustrezne neposredne prodaje, ni bilo mogoče razviti različnega pristopa za določitev ravni trgovine za delež neposredne prodaje proizvajalcev Unije.
Instead, for the purpose of the injury margin calculation, the direct sales of Union producers were adjusted back to the ex-works level and subjected to the freight adjustment described in recital 92 point (iv) above.
Namesto tega je bila neposredna prodaja proizvajalcev Unije za izračun stopnje škode prilagojena na raven franko tovarna in popravljena za prevoz iz uvodne izjave 92, točka (iv).
Against this background, the respective claim of the parties has to be dismissed.
Glede na to je treba ustrezne trditve strani zavreči.
As regards the claim of the parties that the adjustment of the CIF export price should have included the SG&A and a reasonable profit margin (recital 73) it is noted that had the Commission adjusted the export CIF price by adding SG&A and profit, it would have brought the sales of imported goods to the retailer level.
V zvezi s trditvijo strank, da bi morala prilagoditev CIF izvozne cene vključevati prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške ter razumno stopnjo dobička (uvodna izjava 73), je treba ugotoviti, da bi, če bi Komisija prilagodila CIF izvozno ceno tako, da bi prištela prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške ter dobiček, prodajo uvoženega blaga izenačila z maloprodajno ravnjo.
In such case the comparison between the Chinese export prices and the Union sales prices would have been carried out at different levels of trade.
V tem primeru bi bila primerjava med kitajskimi izvoznimi cenami in prodajnimi cenami Unije opravljena na drugačni ravni trgovine.
For this reason, the claim of the parties has to be dismissed.
Zato je treba to trditev strani zavreči.
As regards the argument of the parties that it stems from the disclosure document of 5 December 2011 that 38 % of sales of Union producers in the IP were direct sales (recital 74), it was explained to the parties at the hearings of 29 February 2012 that this conclusion was mistaken.
V zvezi s trditvijo strank, da je iz dokumenta o razkritju z dne 5. decembra 2011 razvidno, da je bilo v OP 38 % prodaje proizvajalcev Unije neposredna prodaja (uvodna izjava 74), je bilo strankam na zaslišanjih dne 29. februarja 2012 pojasnjeno, da je bil ta zaključek napačen.
The figure of 62 % of Union industry sales that were made in Germany and United Kingdom relates to the geographical distribution of the sales and has no relevance as regards the identification of the type of customer, and thus as regards the identification of direct sales.
Delež 62 % prodaje industrije Unije, ki je bila opravljena v Nemčiji in Združenem kraljestvu, se nanaša na geografsko porazdelitev prodaje in ne vpliva na določitev vrste stranke, zato tudi ne na določitev neposredne prodaje.
It may only be deduced from this fact, and it is confirmed, that the remaining 38 % of the sales of Union producers were made outside Germany and the United Kingdom.
Iz tega podatka lahko sklepamo le, da je bilo preostalih 38 % prodaje proizvajalcev Unije opravljenih zunaj Nemčije in Združenega kraljestva, kar je potrjeno.
Since the parties’ assumption on the level of trade of 38 % of sales of Union producers is incorrect, the subsequent claim based on this assumption concerning the need to recalculate the injury margin has to be also dismissed.
Ker je predpostavka strani o ravni trgovine 38 % prodaje proizvajalcev Unije nepravilna, je treba zavreči tudi trditev, ki sledi na podlagi te predpostavke, da je treba ponovno izračunati stopnjo škode.
In this respect it is noted that the invoices constitute information confidential by nature.
V tej zvezi je treba opozoriti, da so računi sami po sebi zaupna informacija.
The parties did not request it.
Strani preučitve niso zahtevale.
For these reasons the Commission considers that the requirement to disclose all but confidential information was met.
Zaradi tega Komisija meni, da je bila zahteva po razkritju vseh informacij, razen zaupnih, izpolnjena.
Furthermore, given that the data under assessment is more than five years old, the Commission considers that it can disclose at this stage that the percentage of direct sales is between 2 % and 12 %.
Poleg tega Komisija meni, da lahko glede na to, da so obravnavani podatki starejši od 5 let, na tej stopnji razkrije, da je znašal delež neposredne prodaje od 2 % do 12 %.
Concerning the objection of the parties to the freight adjustment of the Union ex-works selling price (recital 78) the Commission considers the adjustment in question was made to bring the goods to the importer’s warehouse, i.e. to the same level of trade as the Chinese exports.
V zvezi z ugovorom strani o prilagoditvi prodajne cene Unije franko tovarna za prevoz (uvodna izjava 78) Komisija meni, da je bila zadevna prilagoditev opravljena zato, da se šteje blago v skladišču uvoznika, kar pomeni na isti ravni trgovine kakor kitajski izvoz.
This adjustment was based on the specific circumstances of the relevant market where the canned mandarins are only produced in one Spanish region (Valencia) and are mainly sold in Germany and United Kingdom.
Ta prilagoditev je temeljila na posebnih okoliščinah ustreznega trga, ker se mandarine v pločevinkah proizvajajo samo v eni španski regiji (Valenciji) in se prodajajo predvsem v Nemčiji in Združenem kraljestvu.
It was made to achieve the fair comparison between export price and the Union price at the same level of trade, not to offset the claimed cost disadvantage of the Union producers due to the location of their production facilities.
S tem se je dosegla pravična primerjava med izvozno ceno in ceno Unije na enaki ravni trgovine, da ne bi upoštevali domnevnih stroškovno neugodnih dejavnikov proizvajalcev Unije zaradi lokacije njihovih proizvodnih obratov.
The argument of the parties is therefore dismissed.
Zato se trditve strani zavržejo.
Concerning the argument that the Commission should have taken into account the higher costs of importers because the Chinese products were delivered in containers while the Union industry products were palletised which resulted in the reduction of handling charges by the Union producers (recital 79), it is noted that the adjustments made covered only the cost of bringing the goods to the importer’s warehouse.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da bi morala Komisija upoštevati višje stroške uvoznikov, ker so bili kitajski izdelki dostavljeni v kontejnerjih, medtem ko so bili izdelki industrije Unije na paletah, kar je zmanjšalo manipulativne stroške proizvajalcev Unije (uvodna izjava 79), je treba opozoriti, da so prilagoditve pokrivale samo stroške dostave blaga v skladišče uvoznika.
The subsequent costs incurred in the context of the shipment of the goods to the retailers are to be borne after the defined level of trade and cannot be therefore taken into account.
Nadaljnji stroški, ki so nastali v okviru prevoza blaga do trgovcev na drobno, se krijejo po določeni ravni trgovine in jih zato ni mogoče upoštevati.
For this reason the argument of the parties is dismissed.
Zato se trditev strani zavrže.
Concerning the argument that the transport costs of the Union producers should have been reduced to take into account cases where the products were delivered directly to the customers of importers as claimed by the latter (recital 80), it is recalled that the freight adjustment of the Union ex-works sales price was based on the established costs of physical delivery to the warehouse in Hamburg (EUR 90) based on collected invoices, because the warehouse Hamburg is the appropriate level of trade for comparing export price and prices of the Union product.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da bi morali biti stroški prevoza za proizvajalce Unije zmanjšani tako, da bi upoštevali primere, ko so bili izdelki dostavljeni neposredno strankam uvoznikov, kot so trdili slednji (uvodna izjava 80), je treba opozoriti, da je prilagoditev prodajne cene Unije franko tovarna za prevoz temeljila na ugotovljenih stroških fizične dostave v skladišče v Hamburgu (90 EUR) na podlagi zbranih računov, ker je skladišče v Hamburgu primerna raven trgovine za primerjavo izvozne cene in cen izdelka Unije.
The freight adjustment is not justified on the ground that it includes total transport costs between the Union producer and the retailer (which would be higher than the costs for delivery to the warehouse), but on the ground that in the light of the specificities of the market for the product concerned, the warehouse in Hamburg is the appropriate level of trade.
Prilagoditev za prevoz ni upravičena na podlagi tega, da vključuje celotne stroške prevoza med proizvajalcem Unije in trgovci na drobno (ki bi bili višji kakor stroški dostave v skladišče), ampak na podlagi tega, da je z vidika posebnosti trga za zadevni izdelek, skladišče v Hamburgu primerna raven trgovine.
In this context, the argument raised by the parties appears immaterial.
Glede na to je videti, da je trditev strank brezpredmetna.
The parties claimed that the applied freight adjustment was too high because it was based on the transport costs by truck (recital 81).
Strani so trdile, da je bila uporabljena prilagoditev za prevoz previsoka, ker je temeljila na stroških prevoza s tovornjakom (uvodna izjava 81).
In this context, it is recalled that the freight adjustment was based on the established costs of physical delivery to Hamburg, which included both truck and boat.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da je bila prilagoditev za prevoz opravljena na podlagi ugotovljenih stroškov fizične dostave v Hamburg, ki vključuje tovornjak in ladjo.
Therefore, the adjustment requested by the parties had already been included in the calculation of freight cost to Hamburg.
Zato je bila prilagoditev, ki so jo zahtevale stranke, že vključena v izračun stroškov prevoza v Hamburg.
It was therefore not necessary to verify the data submitted by the parties during the hearing, as during the original investigation, the costs for delivery to Hamburg had been established on the basis of the verified data of the Union producers.
Zato ni bilo treba preverjati podatkov, ki so jih predložile strani na zaslišanju, ker so bili v prvotni preiskavi stroški dostave v Hamburg ugotovljeni na podlagi preverjenih podatkov proizvajalcev Unije.
Regarding the comment made by the applicant concerning the calculation of the post-importation cost (recital 82), it was stated that, as explained in paragraph 9 of the disclosure document sent on 5 December 2011, both terminal handling charges and the costs for trucking to the importer’s premises were included in the calculation.
V zvezi s pripombo tožeče stranke v zvezi z izračunom stroškov po uvozu (uvodna izjava 82), je bilo navedeno, kot je razloženo v odstavku 9 dokumenta o razkritju, poslanega 5. decembra 2011, da so bili v izračun vključeni stroški postopkov v terminalu in stroški prevoza s tovornjakom v prostore uvoznika.
No ocean or insurance freights were included in terminal handling charges as these costs were already included in the CIF price gathered and verified during the on-spot verifications at the exporter’s premises.
Stroški čezmorskega prevoza in stroški zavarovanja niso bili vključeni v stroške postopkov v terminalu, ker so bili ti stroški že vključeni v CIF ceno, ki je bila zbrana in preverjena med preverjanji na kraju samem v prostorih izvoznika.
Thus, if the Commission had included those costs in the calculation of the post-importation costs this would have implied double-counting.
Če bi torej Komisija te stroške vključila v izračun stroškov po izvozu, bi to pomenilo dvakratno štetje.
On 5 December 2011 the Commission submitted a disclosure document with facts and figures relating to the grounds on which the General Court annulled the measures.
Komisija je 5. decembra 2011 predložila dokument o razkritju z dejstvi in podatki v zvezi z razlogi, zaradi katerih je Splošno sodišče razveljavilo ukrepe.
All interested parties were invited to comment.
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile pozvane k predložitvi pripomb.
On 29 February 2012 the Commission held hearings with all parties that requested so, including a joint hearing with the Hearing Officer of the exporters concerned and a group of importers.
Komisija je 29. februarja 2012 zaslišala vse strani, ki so to zahtevale, vključno s skupnim zaslišanjem s pooblaščencem zadevnih izvoznikov za zaslišanje in skupino uvoznikov.
On 26 March 2012 one of the interested parties informed the Commission that in view of the judgment in Case C-338/10 it considered the partial reopening concerning post-importation cost without purpose.
Ena od zainteresiranih strani je 26. marca 2012 obvestila Komisijo, da glede na sodbo v zadevi C-338/10 šteje, da je delna obnova v zvezi s stroški po uvozu brezpredmetna.
On 17 July 2012 the Commission responded that in the light of the reopening of 19 June 2012 it was considered that both partial reopenings are still pending and none of these investigations had become without purpose.
Komisija je 17. julija 2012 odgovorila, da se glede na obnovo z dne 19. junija 2012 šteje, da sta obe delni obnovi še v teku in nobena od teh preiskav ni postala brezpredmetna.
The Xinshiji judgment of General Court has been implemented by providing additional reasoning, information and explanation to the parties on the reopened point of the original investigation.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča v zadevi Xinshiji je bila izvršena z zagotovitvijo dodatne obrazložitve, informacij in razlage stranem o obnovljeni točki prvotne preiskave.
The parties were given opportunity to comment and to be heard.
Strani so dobile priložnost podati pripombe in biti zaslišane.
All arguments raised have been addressed and duly taken into account.
Vse navedene trditve so bile obravnavane in ustrezno upoštevane.
Account taken of the comments made by the parties and the analysis thereof it was concluded that the arguments and facts raised by the interested parties did not show a need to modify the contested injury margin calculation.
Po upoštevanju vseh pripomb strani in po njihovi analizi je bilo zaključeno, da trditve in dejstva, ki so jih navedle zainteresirane strani, niso pokazale potrebe po spremembi izpodbijanega izračuna stopnje škode.
Therefore, the injury margin determined in the original investigation is hereby confirmed.
Zato se s tem potrjuje stopnja škode, določena v prvotni preiskavi.
On the basis of the above it was concluded that the implementation of the Xinshiji judgment should take the form of reimposing the definitive anti-dumping duty for the applicants in the case in question.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo zaključeno, da bi morala izvršitev sodbe Xinshiji potekati v obliki ponovne uvedbe dokončne protidampinške dajatve za tožečo stran v obravnavani zadevi.
One of the exporting parties argued that there is a discrepancy between the level of the consumption set out in the safeguard Regulation and the level set in the provisional Regulation.
Ena od strani izvoznic je trdila, da se stopnja potrošnje iz uredbe o zaščitnih ukrepih in stopnja iz začasne uredbe razlikujeta.
It is underlined that the difference in the level of consumption was basically due to the different product scope in the current investigation and to the different number of Member States in those two investigations.
Poudariti je treba, da se stopnja potrošnje razlikuje zlasti zaradi drugačnega obsega izdelkov pri sedanji preiskavi in različnega števila držav članic pri obeh preiskavah.
In respect of the market share some interested parties opposed the Commission statement set out in recital 58 of the provisional Regulation that indicated an increase of the market share of the dumped imports.
V zvezi s tržnim deležem se nekatere zainteresirane strani niso strinjale z izjavo Komisije iz uvodne izjave 58 začasne uredbe, da se je tržni delež dampinškega uvoza povečal.
They argued that contrary to the Commission findings the market share of imports from the PRC decreased.
Trdile so, da se je tržni delež uvoza iz LRK v nasprotju z ugotovitvami Komisije zmanjšal.
As set out in said recital there was only one year where the market share of the Chinese imports decreased.
Kot je navedeno v navedeni uvodni izjavi, se je tržni delež kitajskega uvoza zmanjšal le v enem letu.
For the rest of the period examined the market share of imports from the PRC remained consistently high.
V preostalem proučenem obdobju je tržni delež uvoza iz LRK ostal dosledno velik.
Some parties argued that post-IP volumes should also be examined to assess whether Chinese imports are increasing.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da bi bilo treba proučiti tudi obseg po OP in tako oceniti, ali se kitajski uvoz povečuje.
It is to be noted that trends on imports from the PRC were evaluated for the period 2002/03 to 2006/07 and a clear increase was observed.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bilo gibanje uvoza iz LRK ocenjeno za obdobje 2002/2003 do 2006/2007, pri čemer je bilo ugotovljeno nedvomno povečanje.
In any event, as stated below in recital 136 the level of imports post-IP was examined and was found to be significant.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 136, je bila v vsakem primeru raven uvoza po OP proučena, pri čemer je bilo ugotovljeno, da je znatna.
Where justified, calculations were adapted.
Izračuni so bili prilagojeni, kadar je bila prilagoditev utemeljena.