natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the purposes of the analysis the report did not take into account the possible participation of private shareholders in the capital increase as its impact on the value of the Romanian State's stake is considered to be neutral.
Za namene analize poročilo ni upoštevalo možne udeležbe zasebnih delničarjev pri povečanju lastniškega kapitala, ker naj bi bil vpliv takšne udeležbe na lastniški delež romunske države nevtralen.
Discounted by the discount factor of 10,7 to 30 June 2011 similarly to the liquidation value.
Diskontirana z diskontnim količnikom 10,7 na dan 30. junija 2011, podobno kot likvidacijska vrednost.
These comments were transmitted to Romania by letter of 2 March 2010.
Te pripombe so bile posredovane Romuniji z dopisom z dne 2. marca 2010.
Romania replied to the above-mentioned third party observations by letter of 8 April 2010.
Romunija je na navedene pripombe tretjih oseb odgovorila z dopisom z dne 8. aprila 2010.
A sixth third party, Firebird Management LLC (hereinafter: ‘Firebird’) – an investment fund holding at the time 1,328 % of Oltchim's shares – submitted information and comments by letters of 27 May 2010 and 8 July 2010.
Šesta tretja oseba, podjetje Firebird Management LLC (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Firebird) – investicijski sklad, ki je v tistem času imel 1,328-odstotni lastniški delež v podjetju Oltchim –, je posredovala informacije in pripombe z dopisi z dne 27. maja 2010 in 8. julija 2010.
Firebird's comments were transmitted to Romania by letters of 25 June 2010 and 27 July 2010 respectively.
Pripombe podjetja Firebird so bile Romuniji posredovane z dopisi z dne 25. junija 2010 in 27. julija 2010.
PCC, the complainant, submitted information on the case by letters of 6 May 2010, 18 May 2010, 19 May 2010, 28 May 2010, 13 June 2010, 18 June 2010, 22 July 2010, 6 August 2010, 2 September 2010, 18 October 2010, 9 April 2011 and 14 April 2011.
Podjetje PCC, pritožnik, je predložilo svoje informacije o zadevi z dopisi z dne 6. maja 2010, 18. maja 2010, 19. maja 2010, 28. maja 2010, 13. junija 2010, 18. junija 2010, 22. julija 2010, 6. avgusta 2010, 2. septembra 2010, 18. oktobra 2010, 9. aprila 2011 in 14. aprila 2011.
Besides these submissions, PCC sent numerous pieces of information related to the case, principally including various newspaper articles and other information, mostly publicly available.
Poleg tega je podjetje PCC predložilo številne informacije, povezane z zadevo, predvsem časopisne članke in druge informacije, povečini javno dostopne.
Romania replied to the additional comments submitted by letters of 30 July 2010, 2 September 2010, 12 October 2010, 26 October 2010, 23 November 2010 and 7 December 2011.
Romunija je odgovorila na dodatne pripombe z dopisi z dne 30. julija 2010, 2. septembra 2010, 12. oktobra 2010, 26. oktobra 2010, 23. novembra 2010 in 7. decembra 2011.
It also submitted additional information on the case by letters of 29 March 2011, 14 April 2011, 27 July 2011, 9 September 2011 and 21 September 2011.
Poslala je tudi dodatne informacije o zadevi z dopisi z dne 29. marca 2011, 14. aprila 2011, 27. julija 2011, 9. septembra 2011 in 21. septembra 2011.
Following the opening decision, several meetings took place in Brussels between the Commission's departments and the Romanian authorities: on 30 June 2010, 15 July 2010, 19 May 2011 and 12 September 2011.
Po sprejetju sklepa o začetku postopka je bilo organiziranih več sestankov v Bruslju med službami Komisije in romunskimi organi, in sicer 30. junija 2010, 15. julija 2010, 19. maja 2011 in 12. septembra 2011.
The Commission's departments also met on several occasions with representatives of the complainant PCC.
Službe Komisije so se večkrat sestale tudi s predstavniki pritožnika, podjetja PCC.
The privatisation announcement was to be released at the end of March 2012, and the privatisation was to be concluded by the end of May 2012.
Napoved privatizacije naj bi bila javno objavljena konec marca 2012, privatizacija pa naj bi bila zaključena do konca maja 2012.
By letter of 16 February 2012, the new Romanian Prime Minister Mihai-Răzvan Ungureanu re-affirmed these commitments.
Z dopisom z dne 16. februarja 2012 je novi romunski predsednik vlade Mihai-Răzvan Ungureanu znova potrdil te zaveze.
However, as a potential investor (Rompetrol) and minority shareholders challenged the 2003 debt conversion in the Romanian courts, the privatisation offer was cancelled in early November 2003.
Ko pa so potencialni vlagatelj (Rompetrol) in manjšinski delničarji na romunskih sodiščih izpodbijali pretvorbo dolga iz leta 2003, je bila ponudba za privatizacijo na začetku novembra 2003 preklicana.
Notwithstanding this, in November 2003 the AVAS debt of USD 95 million (i.e. the transferred USD 91 million plus further payments made by the Ministry of Finance in application of the guarantees and transferred to AVAS since June 2002), equal to RON 322 million, was converted into equity by decision of the Oltchim General Meeting of Shareholders (in which the state representatives had majority votes).
Ne glede na to so bile terjatve agencije AVAS novembra 2003 s sklepom skupščine delničarjev podjetja Oltchim (v kateri so imeli državni predstavniki večinske glasove) v višini 95 milijonov USD oziroma 322 milijonov RON (tj. prenesenih 91 milijonov USD plus dodatna plačila, ki jih je Ministrstvo za finance izvedlo zaradi uveljavitve jamstev in jih na agencijo AVAS preneslo od junija 2002) pretvorjene v lastniški kapital.
The court decision annulling the debt conversion became final in August 2006.
Odločba sodišča o razveljavitvi pretvorbe dolga je postala končna avgusta 2006.
The share capital decrease effectively took place in November 2007.
Do zmanjšanja osnovnega kapitala je dejansko prišlo novembra 2007.
The debt resulting from the annulment of the debt conversion was re-entered in the accounts at its historical value of USD 95 million, subsequently equalling RON 317 million.
Nastali dolg iz razveljavitve pretvorbe dolga je bil ponovno vnesen v računovodske izkaze po izvirni vrednosti 95 milijonov USD oziroma 317 milijonov RON.
After the first transfer of the debt in June 2002 to AVAS, over the period June 2002 to December 2006 the Ministry of Finance continued to make payments on account of the state guarantees which had been triggered in November 1999.
Po prvem prenosu terjatev na agencijo AVAS junija 2002 je Ministrstvo za finance v obdobju od junija 2002 do decembra 2006 nadaljevalo s plačili na podlagi državnih jamstev, izdanih od novembra 1999.
Over the period 2003-2006, while the 2003 debt conversion was still in place, the total sum of extra payments made by the Ministry of Finance on account of the triggered guarantees amounted to RON 191 million.
V obdobju 2003–2006, ko je še vedno veljala pretvorba dolga iz leta 2003, je vsota dodatnih plačil s strani Ministrstva za finance na podlagi jamstev znašala 191 milijonov RON.
The Romanian authorities argue that after the reversal of the 2003 debt conversion in 2006 they tried again to privatise the company with the debt, in 2006 and 2008 respectively.
Romunski organi navajajo, da so po prvem storniranju pretvorbe dolga iz leta 2003 leta 2006 in 2008 ponovno poskusili privatizirati podjetje z dolgom.
According to the Romanian authorities, no investor was interested in buying on such terms.
Glede na navedbe romunskih organov noben vlagatelj ni bil zainteresiran za nakup pod takšnimi pogoji.
In its comments on the opening decision, dated 26 January 2010, Vestolit expressed concerns about the state support package notified in July 2009 by Romania.
V svojih pripombah na sklep o začetku postopka z dne 26. januarja 2010 je podjetje Vestolit izrazilo pomisleke o paketu državne pomoči, ki ga je Romunija priglasila julija 2009.
Vestolit considers itself a competitor of Oltchim, as both parties are active in the production of PVC.
Podjetje Vestolit navaja, da je konkurent podjetju Oltchim, saj sta obe stranki dejavni v proizvodnji PVC.
More specifically, by letter dated 21 October 2011 addressed to Vice-President Joaquín Almunia, Romanian Prime Minister Emil Boc declared that Romania was committed to privatising Oltchim fully (including the stake subject to the debt conversion) by May 2012.
Točneje, z dopisom z dne 21. oktobra 2011, naslovljenim na podpredsednika Joaquína Almunio, je romunski predsednik vlade Emil Boc navedel, da bo Romunija v celoti privatizirala podjetje Oltchim (vključno z deležem, ki je predmet pretvorbe dolga) do maja 2012.
Following the appointment of a new government in Romania on 9 February 2012, the new Prime Minister, Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu, re-confirmed this commitment by letter dated 16 February 2012.
Po svojem imenovanju je novi predsednik vlade Mihai Razvan Ungureanu ponovno potrdil to zavezo z dopisom z dne 16. februarja 2012.
As indicated in Section II.2 above, the payments made on account of the triggered guarantees lasted until 2006.
Kot je navedeno v Oddelku II.2 zgoraj, so se plačila na podlagi uveljavljanih jamstev izvajala do leta 2006.
No further payments were made on this account as of the accession date onwards, as Oltchim was able to service the still-outstanding part of the loans.
V zvezi s tem od dneva pristopa dalje niso bila izvedena nobena dodatna plačila, saj je bilo podjetje Oltchim sposobno odplačati še neporavnani del posojil.
In that regard, the Commission notes that Romania had pursued the strategy of a debt-to-equity conversion with a view to continuing Oltchim's activities since the first (failed) attempt to do so in 2003.
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da je Romunija sledila strategiji pretvorbe dolga v lastniški kapital z namenom nadaljevanja dejavnosti podjetja Oltchim vse od prvega (neuspelega) poskusa leta 2003.
The behaviour of the Romanian authorities in that regard was therefore consistent with their prior behaviour.
Ravnanje romunskih organov je bilo v tem smislu skladno z njihovim predhodnim ravnanjem.
Under Romanian law, companies in which the State holds a stake of at least 50 % + 1 are liquidated under the so-called 'special voluntary liquidation procedure' established by Government Emergency Order 88/1997, Government Decision 577/2002 and Law 137/2002.
V skladu z romunsko zakonodajo se podjetja, v katerih ima država v lasti najmanj 50 % + 1 delnico, likvidirajo v tako imenovanem „posebnem postopku prostovoljne likvidacije“, ki je bil sprejet z izrednim odlokom vlade št. 88/1997, odločbo vlade št. 577/2002 in zakonom št. 137/2002.
Under that special voluntary liquidation procedure, the amount obtained by the liquidator from the sale of the company's assets is to be used for covering the company's outstanding debts following the same order of preference as established by Law 85/2006 (the Romanian insolvency law).
V skladu s tem posebnim postopkom prostovoljne likvidacije se znesek, ki ga od prodaje sredstev podjetja prejme likvidacijski upravitelj, uporabi za pokritje neplačanih dolgov podjetja v enakem prednostnem vrstnem redu, kot je določen v zakonu št. 85/2006 (romunski zakon o nesolventnosti).
The sum to be obtained by AVAS was subsequently discounted [33] to its present value on 30 June 2011.
Znesek, ki naj bi ga prejela agencija AVAS, je bil kasneje diskontiran [33] na svojo sedanjo vrednost na dan 30. junija 2011.
As a result, AVAS would collect EUR [10]-[40] million in the event of the liquidation of the company.
Posledično bi agencija AVAS v primeru likvidacije podjetja prejela [10]–[40] milijonov EUR.
More precisely, whereas the 44 months weighted average is RON 0,53 per share, the share price even reached RON 2,05 in July 2011 [37].
Natančneje, tehtano povprečje v obdobju 44 mesecev je bilo 0,53 RON za delnico, julija 2011 pa je bila dosežena povprečna cena 2,05 RON za delnico [37].
Thus, the data used for establishing the market value can be considered to be conservative.
Podatki za ugotavljanje tržne vrednosti tako veljajo za konzervativne.
12 months price evolution
esečno gibanje cene
See e.g. Commission Decision of 24.4.2007 in Case E 12/2005 Unlimited guarantee to Poczta Polska, OJ C 284, 27.11.2007, p. 2, Commission Decision of 18.7.2007 in Case C 27/2004 Agrobanka, OJ L 67, 11.3.2008, p. 3, Commission Decision of 28.1.2004 in Case CZ 14/2003 Česka Spoŕitelna, a.s., OJ C 195, 31.7.2004, p. 2, and Commission Decision of 3.3.2004 in Case CZ 58/2003 Evrobanka, a.s,.
Glej npr. Odločbo Komisije z dne 24.4.2007 v zadevi E 12/2005 Neomejena jamstva podjetju Poczta Polska, UL C 284, 27.11.2007, str. 2, Odločba Komisije z dne 18.7.2007 v zadevi C 27/2004 Agrobanka, UL L 67, 11.3.2008, str. 3, Odločba Komisije z dne 28.1.2004 v zadevi CZ 14/2003 Česka Spoŕitelna, a.s., UL C 195, 31.7.2004, str. 2, in Odločba Komisije z dne 3.3.2004 v zadevi CZ 58/2003 Evrobanka, a.s,.
OJ C 115, 30.4.2004, p. 40.
UL C 115, 30.4.2004, str. 40
of 23 January 2013
z dne 23. januar 2013
on State aid SA.24123 (2012/C) (ex 2011/NN) implemented by the Netherlands Alleged sale of land below market price by the Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg
o državni pomoči SA.24123 (2012/C) (ex 2011/NN), ki jo je izvedla Nizozemska Domnevna prodaja zemljišča pod tržno ceno s strani občine Leidschendam-Voorburg
(notified under document C(2013) 87)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 87)
By letter of 10 September 2007, the Stichting Behoud Damplein Leidschendam (hereinafter “the Stichting”), a foundation set up in 2006 to defend the interests of residents located in the vicinity of the Damplein in Leidschendam-Voorburg (the Netherlands), submitted a complaint to the Commission concerning the alleged grant of State aid in the context of a real estate project initiated by the municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg in co-operation with a number of private parties.
Z dopisom z dne 10. septembra 2007 je Stichting Behoud Damplein Leidschendam (v nadaljnjem besedilu: fundacija), ki je bila leta 2006 ustanovljena za zaščito interesov prebivalcev okolice Dampleina v občini Leidschendam-Voorburg (Nizozemska), pri Komisiji vložila pritožbo zaradi domnevne dodelitve državne pomoči v okviru nepremičninskega projekta, ki ga je začela izvajati občina Leidschendam-Voorburg v sodelovanju s številnimi zasebnimi subjekti.
By letter of 12 October 2007, the Commission forwarded the complaint to the Dutch authorities for their consideration, along with a request to reply to a number of questions.
Z dopisom z dne 12. oktobra 2007 je Komisija posredovala pritožbo v obravnavo nizozemskim organom skupaj z zahtevo, naj odgovorijo na več vprašanj.
By letter of 26 January 2012, the Commission informed the Netherlands that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2] (hereinafter: “TFEU”) in respect of a specific measure taken in the context of the real estate project.
Z dopisom z dne 26. januarja 2012 je Komisija obvestila Nizozemsko o svojem sklepu, da v zvezi s posebnim ukrepom, ki je bil sprejet v okviru nepremičninskega projekta, začne postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
The Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure (hereinafter “the opening decision”) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Sklep Komisije o začetku postopka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka) je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
By way of this decision, the Commission invited interested parties to submit comments on its preliminary assessment of the measure.
Komisija je s tem sklepom pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe glede njene predhodne ocene ukrepa.
By letter of 18 April 2012, the Dutch authorities submitted their observations on the opening decision, after having received two extensions of the deadline to comment and after a meeting with the Commission services on 12 March 2012 in the presence of the beneficiary of the measure.
Z dopisom z dne 18. aprila 2012 so nizozemski organi po dveh podaljšanjih roka za predložitev pripomb in po sestanku s službami Komisije z dne 12. marca 2012, na katerem je bil navzoč upravičenec ukrepov, predložili svoje pripombe glede sklepa o začetku postopka.
By letter of 16 April 2012, the Stichting submitted its comments to the Commission on the opening decision.
Z dopisom z dne 16. aprila 2012 je fundacija predložila Komisiji svoje pripombe glede sklepa o začetku postopka.
The beneficiaries and the parties involved
2.1 Upravičenci in vpletene strani
The beneficiary of the measures is the partnership Schouten-de Jong Bouwfonds (hereinafter “SJB”).
Upravičenec ukrepov je partnerstvo Schouten-de Jong Bouwfonds (v nadaljnjem besedilu: partnerstvo SJB).
This partnership was set up by Schouten & De Jong Projectontwikkeling BV (hereinafter "Schouten de Jong") and Bouwfonds Ontwikkeling BV (hereinafter "Bouwfonds") for the purposes of the contested real estate project and does not have legal personality under Dutch law.
Partnerstvo, ki sta ga družba Schouten & De Jong Projectontwikkeling BV (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Schouten de Jong) in družba Bouwfonds Ontwikkeling BV (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Bouwfonds) ustanovili za potrebe spornega nepremičninskega projekta, po nizozemski zakonodaji ni pravna oseba.
As members of the SJB partnership, Schouten de Jong and Bouwfonds should also be considered beneficiaries of the measures [4].
Za upravičenki ukrepov bi bilo treba kot članici partnerstva SJB šteti tudi družbi Schouten de Jong in Bouwfonds [4].
Schouten de Jong, established in Voorburg, the Netherlands, is active in real estate project development in the Netherlands, in particular in the Leidschendam area.
Družba Schouten de Jong, ki je bila ustanovljena v Voorburgu na Nizozemskem, je dejavna na področju razvoja nepremičninskih projektov na Nizozemskem, zlasti na območju Leidschendama.
Its turnover amounted to EUR 60 million in 2011.
Njeni prihodki od prodaje so leta 2011 znašali 60 milijonov EUR.
Bouwfonds, established in Delft, the Netherlands, and a subsidiary of Rabo Vastgoed, is the largest real estate developer in the Netherlands and among the top three largest players on the European real estate market.
Družba Bouwfonds, podružnica družbe Rabo Vastgoed, je bila ustanovljena v Delftu na Nizozemskem in je največji razvijalec nepremičnin na Nizozemskem ter se uvršča med tri največje akterje na evropskem nepremičninskem trgu.
Bouwfonds is active, in particular, in the Netherlands, Germany and France.
Dejavna je zlasti na Nizozemskem, v Nemčiji in Franciji.
It had a turnover of EUR 1,6 billion in 2011.
Njeni prihodki od prodaje so leta 2011 znašali 1,6 milijarde EUR.
The municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg (hereinafter: “the Municipality”) is located in the province of South Holland, close to The Hague, in the Netherlands.
Občina Leidschendam-Voorburg (v nadaljnjem besedilu: občina) se nahaja v nizozemski provinci Južna Holandija, blizu mesta Haag.
A public-private partnership in the form of a vennootschap onder firma (hereinafter: the “PPP”) was set-up by the Municipality and SJB to undertake the ground exploitation phase of the contested real estate project.
Javno-zasebno partnerstvo v obliki vennootschap onder firma (v nadaljnjem besedilu: JZP) sta občina in partnerstvo SJB ustanovila za izvajanje faze uporabe stavbnega zemljišča v spornem nepremičninskem projektu.
Each party to the PPP was to bear 50 % of the costs and the risks associated with the ground exploitation phase of the project.
Vsaka stran v JZP naj bi nosila 50 % stroškov in tveganj, povezanih s fazo uporabe stavbnega zemljišča v projektu.
The decision-making of the PPP was to be by unanimity.
Sprejemanje odločitev v JZP naj bi bilo soglasno.
According to the information provided by the Dutch authorities, Schouten de Jong and Bouwfonds are each jointly and severally liable ("hoofdelijk aansprakelijk") for the fulfilment by SJB of its obligations under the PPP agreement [5].
Po podatkih, ki so jih predložili nizozemski organi, sta družbi Schouten de Jong in Bouwfonds solidarno odgovorni (hoofdelijk aansprakelijk) za to, da partnerstvo SJB izpolnjuje obveznosti iz sporazuma o JZP [5].
The real estate project
2.2 Nepremičninski projekt
On 6 April 2004, the Council of the Municipality adopted a Concept Ground Exploitation Masterplan Damcentrum and a Concept Masterplan Damcentrum laying down a framework agreement aimed at revitalising Leidschendam's city centre (hereinafter: the “Leidschendam Centrum Project”) [6].
Občinski svet je 6. aprila 2004 sprejel „Koncept glavnega načrta o uporabi stavbnega zemljišča Damcentrum“ in „Koncept glavnega načrta Damcentrum“, ki sestavljata okvirni sporazum za oživitev mestnega središča Leidschendama (v nadaljnjem besedilu: projekt Mestno središče Leidschendama) [6].
The Leidschendam Centrum Project concerns an area of approximately 20.7 hectares and consists of demolishing approximately 280 mainly social housing units, renewing public spaces and utilities (sewerage, paving, lightning, etc.) and constructing approximately 600 new housing units – both social housing and free sector housing – as well as approximately 3000 square metres of commercial (shopping) space, a two-level underground parking garage, and the relocation and rebuilding of a school.
Projekt Mestno središče Leidschendama, ki zadeva približno 20,7 hektarja površine, zajema rušenje okoli 280 večinoma neprofitnih stanovanjskih enot, obnovo javnih površin in infrastrukture (kanalizacija, tlakovanje, razsvetljava itd.), gradnjo približno 600 novih stanovanjskih enot (v neprofitnem in profitnem stanovanjskem sektorju), približno 3000 kvadratnih metrov poslovnih (nakupovalnih) prostorov in dvonivojske podzemne parkirne hiše ter premestitev in obnovo šole.
The Leidschendam Centrum Project was divided into various sub-projects, one of which is the real estate project concerning the Damplein (hereinafter: the “Damplein Project”).
Projekt Mestno središče Leidschendama je bil razdeljen na različne podprojekte in eden od njih je nepremičninski projekt, ki se nanaša na Damplein (v nadaljnjem besedilu: projekt Damplein).
The construction phase
2.2.1 Faza gradnje
On the basis of the Leidschendam Centrum Project, the Municipality concluded a co-operation agreement with a number of private project developers, including with SJB, on 9 September 2004 (hereinafter: the “2004 Co-operation Agreement”).
Na podlagi projekta Mestno središče Leidschendama je občina 9. septembra 2004 sklenila sporazum o sodelovanju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum o sodelovanju iz leta 2004) z več zasebnimi razvijalci projektov, vključno s partnerstvom SJB.
The 2004 Co-operation Agreement stipulates that the private project developers would, for each of the specific sub-parts of the Leidschendam Centrum Project assigned to them, construct and sell, for their own risk and expense, the envisaged real estate.
V sporazumu o sodelovanju iz leta 2004 je določeno, da zasebni razvijalci projektov za vsakega od posebnih sestavnih delov projekta Mestno središče Leidschendama, ki jim je dodeljen, na svoje stroške in na lastno tveganje zgradijo in prodajo predvideno nepremičnino.
According to the 2004 Co-operation Agreement, the construction works would begin once the land had been made ready for construction (see recital (22) below) and the necessary building permits had been obtained.
V skladu s sporazumom o sodelovanju iz leta 2004 bi se gradbena dela lahko začela, takoj ko bi bilo zemljišče pripravljeno za gradnjo (glej uvodno izjavo 22) in bi bila pridobljena ustrezna gradbena dovoljenja.
However, as regards the construction of the free sector housing units, the private developers were allowed to postpone construction until 70 % of these units, whether or not in combination with social housing units, in the sub-project area concerned had been pre-sold (Article 7.5 of the 2004 Co-operation Agreement, hereinafter: the “70 % clause”).
Vendar je bilo zasebnim razvijalcem dovoljeno, da preložijo gradnjo stanovanjskih enot v profitnem sektorju, dokler 70 % teh enot, v kombinaciji z neprofitnimi stanovanjskimi enotami ali brez teh, na območju zadevnega podprojekta ne bi bilo že vnaprej prodanih (člen 7(5) sporazuma o sodelovanju iz leta 2004, v nadaljnjem besedilu: klavzula o 70 %).