natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council Conclusions of 27 to 28 November 2008 indicated that a new strategy should be developed with the Member States and the Commission, taking into account the content of the 2001 Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime.
Iz Sklepov Sveta z dne 27. do 28. novembra 2008 izhaja, da bi morale države članice in Komisija oblikovati novo strategijo, pri tem pa upoštevati vsebino Konvencije Sveta Evrope o kibernetski kriminaliteti iz leta 2001.
That Convention is the legal framework of reference for combating cybercrime, including attacks against information systems.
Ta konvencija je referenčni pravni okvir za boj proti kibernetski kriminaliteti, vključno z napadi na informacijske sisteme.
This Directive builds on that Convention.
Ta direktiva nadgrajuje to konvencijo.
Completing the process of ratification of that Convention by all Member States as soon as possible should be considered to be a priority.
Vse države članice bi morale prednostno in čim prej zaključiti postopek ratifikacije te konvencije.
Given the different ways in which attacks can be conducted, and given the rapid developments in hardware and software, this Directive refers to tools that can be used in order to commit the offences laid down in this Directive.
Glede na različne možne načine izvajanja napadov ter hiter razvoj strojne in programske opreme se ta direktiva sklicuje na „orodja“, ki se lahko uporabijo za storitev kaznivih dejanj, določenih v tej direktivi.
Such tools could include malicious software, including those able to create botnets, used to commit cyber attacks.
Tovrstna orodja bi lahko vključevala zlonamerna programska oprema, vključno s tisto, s katero se lahko ustvarijo „botneti“, ki se uporabljajo za kibernetske napade.
Even where such a tool is suitable or particularly suitable for carrying out one of the offences laid down in this Directive, it is possible that it was produced for a legitimate purpose Motivated by the need to avoid criminalisation where such tools are produced and put on the market for legitimate purposes, such as to test the reliability of information technology products or the security of information systems, apart from the general intent requirement, a direct intent requirement that those tools be used to commit one or more of the offences laid down in this Directive must be also fulfilled.
Tudi kadar so tovrstna orodja primerna ali še posebej primerna za storitev enega od kaznivih dejanj, določenih v tej direktivi, so bila morda izdelana za zakonit namen. Z namenom, da se izogne kriminalizaciji, kadar so bila tovrstna orodja proizvedena in dana na trg za zakonite namene, kot je preverjanje zanesljivosti produktov informacijske tehnologije ali varnosti informacijskih sistemov, v takem primeru ni dovolj, da ima oseba splošni naklep, ampak mora imeti neposreden naklep, da se ta orodja uporabijo za storitev enega ali več od kaznivih dejanj, določenih v tej direktivi.
This Directive does not impose criminal liability where the objective criteria of the offences laid down in this Directive are met but the acts are committed without criminal intent, for instance where a person does not know that access was unauthorised or in the case of mandated testing or protection of information systems, such as where a person is assigned by a company or vendor to test the strength of its security system.
Ta direktiva ne uvaja kazenske odgovornosti, kadar so izpolnjene objektivna merila kaznivih dejanj, določenih v tej direktivi, vendar dejanja niso storjena naklepno, na primer, če oseba ne ve, da dostop ni dovoljen, ali v primeru pooblaščenega preverjanja ali zaščite informacijskih sistemov, na primer kadar podjetje ali prodajalec osebi naloži, naj preveri odpornost varnostnega sistema.
In the context of this Directive, contractual obligations or agreements to restrict access to information systems by way of a user policy or terms of service, as well as labour disputes as regards the access to and use of information systems of an employer for private purposes, should not incur criminal liability where the access under such circumstances would be deemed unauthorised and thus would constitute the sole basis for criminal proceedings.
V okviru te direktive pogodbene obveznosti ali dogovori za omejitev dostopa do informacijskih sistemov s pogoji uporabe ali pogoji opravljanja storitve, kakor tudi delovni spori v zvezi z dostopom do informacijskih sistemov delodajalca in njihovo uporabo v zasebne namene, ne povzročijo kazenske odgovornosti, kadar bi se dostop pod takšnimi pogoji štel za nepooblaščenega in bi to pomenilo edino podlago za sodni postopek.
This Directive is without prejudice to the right of access to information as laid down in national and Union law, while at the same time it may not serve as a justification for unlawful or arbitrary access to information.
Ta direktiva ne posega v pravico dostopa do informacij, kot je določena v nacionalnem pravu in pravu Unije, hkrati pa ne sme služiti kot opravičilo za nezakonit ali arbitraren dostop do informacij.
Cyber attacks could be facilitated by various circumstances, such as where the offender has access to security systems inherent in the affected information systems within the scope of his or her employment.
Kibernetski napad lahko olajšajo različne okoliščine, na primer kadar ima storilec dostop do varnostnih sistemov, ki so del prizadetih informacijskih sistemov v okviru svoje zaposlitve.
In the context of national law, such circumstances should be taken into account in the course of criminal proceedings as appropriate.
Take okoliščine bi bilo treba - kot je primerno - v okviru nacionalnega prava ustrezno upoštevati v sodnih postopkih.
Member States should provide for aggravating circumstances in their national law in accordance with the applicable rules established by their legal systems on aggravating circumstances.
Države članice bi morale v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi v zvezi z obteževalnimi okoliščinami, določenimi v njihovem pravnem sistemu, v svojem nacionalnem pravu predvideti obteževalne okoliščine.
They should ensure that those aggravating circumstances are available for judges to consider when sentencing offenders.
Zagotoviti bi morale, da lahko sodniki te obteževalne okoliščine upoštevajo ob izrekanju kazni storilcem kaznivih dejanj.
It remains within the discretion of the judge to assess those circumstances together with the other facts of the particular case.
Sodnik ohrani diskrecijsko pravico, da te okoliščine presodi skupaj z drugimi dejstvi v konkretnem primeru.
This Directive does not govern conditions for exercising jurisdiction over any of the offences referred to herein, such as a report by the victim in the place where the offence was committed, a denunciation from the State of the place where the offence was committed, or the non-prosecution of the offender in the place where the offence was committed.
Ta direktiva ne ureja pogojev za izvrševanje sodno pristojnost za katero koli v njej navedeno kaznivo dejanje, kot je prijava, ki jo opravi žrtev v kraju, kjer je bilo kaznivo dejanje storjeno, prijava, ki jo opravi država, v kateri je bilo kaznivo dejanje storjeno, ali dejstvo, da storilec ni bil sodno preganjan v kraju, kjer je bilo kaznivo dejanje storjeno.
In the context of this Directive, States and public bodies remain fully bound to guarantee respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, in accordance with existing international obligations.
V okviru te direktive so države ter javni organi še naprej polno zavezani, da v skladu z obstoječimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi zagotavljajo spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
This Directive strengthens the importance of networks, such as the G8 or the Council of Europe’s network of points of contact available on a 24 hour, seven-day-a-week basis.
Ta direktiva krepi pomen mrež, kot sta mreža kontaktnih točk držav G8 ali Sveta Evrope, ki so dosegljive 24 ur na dan in vse dni v tednu.
Those points of contact should be able to deliver effective assistance thus, for example, facilitating the exchange of relevant information available and the provision of technical advice or legal information for the purpose of investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offences relating to information systems and associated data involving the requesting Member State.
Te kontaktne točke bi morale biti zmožne zagotavljati učinkovito pomoč in tako olajšati na primer izmenjavo razpoložljivih zadevnih informacij in zagotavljanje tehničnih nasvetov ali pravnih informacij za preiskave ali postopke v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, povezanimi z informacijskimi sistemi in zadevnimi podatki, ki zadevajo državo članico prosilko.
In order to ensure the smooth operation of the networks, each contact point should have the capacity to communicate with the point of contact of another Member State on an expedited basis with the support, inter alia, of trained and equipped personnel.
Da se zagotovi nemoteno delovanje omrežij, bi morala vsaka kontaktna točka imeti zmožnost, da po pospešenem postopku komunicira s kontaktno točko druge države članice, pri čemer bi imela med drugim na voljo usposobljeno osebje in ustrezno opremo.
Given the speed with which large-scale cyber attacks can be carried out, Member States should be able to respond promptly to urgent requests from this network of contact points.
Glede na hitrost, s katero je mogoče izvesti kibernetske napade velikega obsega, bi morale biti države članice sposobne zagotoviti hiter odziv na nujne zahtevke te mreže kontaktnih točk.
In such cases, it may be expedient that the request for information be accompanied by telephone contact in order to ensure that the request is processed swiftly by the requested Member State and that feedback is provided within eight hours.
V takih primerih bi bilo morda smiselno, da se v zahtevku za informacije navede telefonski kontakt, da lahko zaprošena država članica zahtevek hitro obravnava in v osmih urah tudi odgovori.
Cooperation between public authorities on the one hand, and the private sector and civil society on the other, is of great importance in preventing and combating attacks against information systems.
Sodelovanje javnih organov na eni z zasebnim sektorjem in s civilno družbo na drugi strani je velikega pomena pri preprečevanju napadov na informacijske sisteme in boju proti njim.
It is necessary to foster and improve cooperation between service providers, producers, law enforcement bodies and judicial authorities, while fully respecting the rule of law.
Treba je spodbujati in izboljšati sodelovanje med ponudniki storitev, proizvajalci, organi pregona in sodnimi organi, pri tem pa dosledno spoštovati načelo pravne države.
Such cooperation could include support by service providers in helping to preserve potential evidence, in providing elements helping to identify offenders and, as a last resort, in shutting down, completely or partially, in accordance with national law and practice, information systems or functions that have been compromised or used for illegal purposes.
Tovrstno sodelovanje lahko vključuje pomoč ponudnikov storitev v smislu ohranjanja morebitnih dokazov, zagotavljanja elementov, ki omogočajo prepoznavanje storilcev, ter, kot zadnjo možnost, popolne ali delne prekinitve delovanja informacijskih sistemov ali funkcij, ki so bili ogroženi ali uporabljeni v nezakonite namene, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in prakso.
Member States should also consider setting up cooperation and partnership networks with service providers and producers for the exchange of information in relation to the offences within the scope of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale razmisliti tudi o vzpostavitvi omrežij za sodelovanje in partnerstvo s ponudniki storitev in proizvajalci za namene izmenjave informacij o kaznivih dejanjih, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive.
There is a need to collect comparable data on the offences laid down in this Directive.
Treba je zbrati primerljive podatke o kaznivih dejanjih, določenih v tej direktivi.
Relevant data should be made available to the competent specialised Union agencies and bodies, such as Europol and ENISA, in line with their tasks and information needs, in order to gain a more complete picture of the problem of cybercrime and network and information security at Union level and thereby to contribute to formulating a more effective response.
Zadevne podatke bi bilo treba dati na voljo pristojnim specializiranim agencijam in organom Unije, kot sta Europol in ENISA, v skladu z njihovimi nalogami in informacijskimi potrebami, da bi dobili jasnejšo sliko problema kibernetske kriminalitete ter varnosti omrežij in informacij na ravni Unije in tako prispevali k oblikovanju učinkovitejšega odziva.
Member States should submit information on the modus operandi of the offenders to Europol and its European Cybercrime Centre for the purpose of conducting threat assessments and strategic analyses of cybercrime in accordance with Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) [4].
Države članice bi morale Europolu in njegovemu evropskemu centru za kibernetski kriminal posredovati informacije o načinu delovanja storilcev, da bi se lahko izvedla ocena nevarnosti in strateška analiza kibernetske kriminalitete v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2009/371/PNZ z dne 6. aprila 2009 o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Europol) [4].
Providing information can facilitate a better understanding of present and future threats and thus contribute to more appropriate and targeted decision-making on combating and preventing attacks against information systems.
Zagotavljanje informacij lahko pripomore k boljšemu razumevanju sedanjih in prihodnjih groženj in tako prispeva k ustreznejšemu in ciljnemu odločanju o preprečevanju napadov na informacijske sisteme in boju proti njim.
The Commission should submit a report on the application of this Directive and make necessary legislative proposals which could lead to broadening its scope, taking into account developments in the field of cybercrime.
Komisija bi morala predložiti poročilo o uporabi te direktive in potrebne zakonodajne predloge, ki bi lahko razširili področje njene uporabe, pri tem pa upoštevati razvoj na področju kibernetske kriminalitete.
Such developments could include technological developments, for example those enabling more effective enforcement in the area of attacks against information systems or facilitating prevention or minimising the impact of such attacks.
Tovrsten razvoj bi lahko pomenil kakršen koli tehnološki razvoj, ki bi omogočil na primer učinkovitejši pregon napadov na informacijske sisteme ali lajšal preprečevanje oziroma blažil učinke takih napadov.
For that purpose, the Commission should take into account the available analyses and reports produced by relevant actors and, in particular, Europol and ENISA.
V ta namen bi morala Komisija upoštevati razpoložljive analize in poročila zadevnih akterjev, zlasti Europola in ENISA.
In order to fight cybercrime effectively, it is necessary to increase the resilience of information systems by taking appropriate measures to protect them more effectively against cyber attacks.
Za učinkovit boj proti kibernetski kriminaliteti je treba sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za izboljšanje odpornosti informacijskih sistemov, da se jih učinkoviteje zaščiti pred kibernetskimi napadi.
Member States should take the necessary measures to protect their critical infrastructure from cyber attacks, as part of which they should consider the protection of their information systems and associated data.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za zaščito informacijskih sistemov, ki so del njihove kritične infrastrukture pred kibernetskimi napadi, v okviru katerih bi morale razmisliti o zaščiti svojih informacijskih sistemov in s tem povezanih podatkov.
Ensuring an adequate level of protection and security of information systems by legal persons, for example in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services in accordance with existing Union legislation on privacy and electronic communication and data protection, forms an essential part of a comprehensive approach to effectively counteracting cybercrime.
Bistveni element celovitega pristopa k učinkovitemu boju proti kibernetski kriminaliteti je tudi zagotavljanje ustrezne ravni zaščite in varnosti informacijskih sistemov s strani pravnih oseb, na primer pri zagotavljanju javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Unije o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah ter varstvu podatkov.
Appropriate levels of protection should be provided against reasonably identifiable threats and vulnerabilities in accordance with the state of the art for specific sectors and the specific data processing situations.
Proti razumno opredeljivim grožnjam in ranljivostim bi bilo treba zagotoviti ustrezne ravni zaščite, v skladu z najsodobnejšo tehnologijo za posamezne sektorje in konkretnimi okoliščinami obdelave podatkov.
The cost and burden of such protection should be proportionate to the likely damage a cyber attack would cause to those affected.
Stroški in breme take zaščite bi morali biti sorazmerni z verjetno škodo, ki bi jo prizadetim povzročil kibernetski napad.
Member States are encouraged to provide for relevant measures incurring liabilities in the context of their national law in cases where a legal person has clearly not provided an appropriate level of protection against cyber attacks.
Države članice se spodbuja, da v okviru nacionalnega prava določijo ustrezne ukrepe, ki vključujejo odgovornost v primerih, ko pravna oseba očitno ne zagotovi ustrezne ravni zaščite pred kibernetskimi napadi.
Significant gaps and differences in Member States’ laws and criminal procedures in the area of attacks against information systems may hamper the fight against organised crime and terrorism, and may complicate effective police and judicial cooperation in this area.
Velike vrzeli in razlike v zakonodaji in kazenskih postopkih držav članic na področju napadov na informacijske sisteme lahko ovirajo boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu ter otežijo učinkovito policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje na tem področju.
The transnational and borderless nature of modern information systems means that attacks against such systems have a cross-border dimension, thus underlining the urgent need for further action to approximate criminal law in this area.
Nadnacionalna in brezmejna narava sodobnih informacijskih sistemov pomeni, da imajo napadi na takšne sisteme čezmejno razsežnost, zato so dodatni ukrepi za približevanje kazenskega prava na tem področju nujni.
In addition, the coordination of prosecution of cases of attacks against information systems should be facilitated by the adequate implementation and application of Council Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA of 30 November 2009 on prevention and settlement of conflict of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings [5].
Dodatno bi moralo ustrezno izvajanje in uporaba Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2009/948/PNZ z dne 30. novembra 2009 o preprečevanju in reševanju sporov o izvajanju pristojnosti v kazenskih postopkih [5] olajšati usklajevanje pregona primerov napadov na informacijske sisteme.
Member States, in cooperation with the Union, should also seek to improve international cooperation relating to the security of information systems, computer networks and computer data.
Države članice bi si morale v sodelovanju z Unijo prizadevati tudi za izboljšanje mednarodnega sodelovanja v zvezi z varnostjo informacijskih sistemov, računalniških omrežij in računalniških podatkov.
Proper consideration of the security of data transfer and storage should be given in any international agreement involving data exchange.
V vsakem mednarodnem dogovoru, ki vključuje izmenjavo podatkov, bi bilo treba ustrezno pozornost nameniti varnosti prenosa in hrambe podatkov.
Improved cooperation between the competent law enforcement bodies and judicial authorities across the Union is essential in an effective fight against cybercrime.
Izboljšano sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi kazenskega pregona in sodnimi organi v Uniji je bistvenega pomena za učinkovit boj proti kibernetski kriminaliteti.
In this context, stepping up the efforts to provide adequate training to the relevant authorities in order to raise the understanding of cybercrime and its impact, and to foster cooperation and the exchange of best practices, for example via the competent specialised Union agencies and bodies, should be encouraged.
V tem okviru bi bilo treba spodbujati odločnejša prizadevanja, da se pristojnim organom zagotovi ustrezno usposabljanje, da bi izboljšali razumevanje kibernetske kriminalitete in njenih učinkov ter spodbudili sodelovanje in izmenjavo najboljših praks, na primer prek pristojnih specializiranih agencij in organov Unije.
Such training should, inter alia, aim at raising awareness about the different national legal systems, the possible legal and technical challenges of criminal investigations, and the distribution of competences between the relevant national authorities.
Tovrstno usposabljanje bi moralo med drugim biti namenjeno ozaveščanju o različnih nacionalnih pravnih sistemih, o morebitnih pravnih in o tehničnih izzivih v okviru kazenskih preiskav ter razdelitvi pristojnosti med zadevnimi nacionalnimi organi.
This Directive respects human rights and fundamental freedoms and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, including the protection of personal data, the right to privacy, freedom of expression and information, the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence and the rights of the defence, as well as the principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties.
Ta direktiva zagotavlja spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter načel, ki jih priznavata zlasti Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah ter Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, vključno z varstvom osebnih podatkov, pravico do zasebnosti, pravicama do svobode izražanja in informiranja, pravico do pravičnega sojenja, načelom domneve nedolžnosti, pravico do obrambe ter tudi načeloma zakonitosti in sorazmernosti kaznivih dejanj in kazni.
In particular, this Directive seeks to ensure full respect for those rights and principles and must be implemented accordingly.
Namen te direktive je zlasti zagotoviti dosledno spoštovanje navedenih pravic in načel, zato jo je treba ustrezno izvajati.
The protection of personal data is a fundamental right in accordance with Article 16(1) TFEU and Article 8 of the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Varstvo osebnih podatkov je temeljna pravica v skladu s členom 16(1) PDEU in členom 8 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Therefore, any processing of personal data in the context of the implementation of this Directive should fully comply with the relevant Union law on data protection.
Zato bi morala biti vsaka obdelava osebnih podatkov v okviru izvajanja te direktive povsem v skladu z zadevnim pravom Unije o varstvu podatkov.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, those Member States have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Directive.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, sta obe državi članici podali uradno obvestilo, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te direktive.