natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The statistical data only covering the product concerned or like product for CN codes 20083055 and 20083075, for the abovementioned countries during the investigation period are as follows:
Statistični podatki, ki zadevajo samo zadevni ali podobni izdelek za oznaki KN 20083055 in 20083075 so za zgoraj navedene države v času preiskave naslednji:
Therefore, it cannot be derived from the statistics that the like product was imported during the investigation period in significant quantities from either Israel or Swaziland.
Zato ni mogoče izpeljati, da je bil podobni izdelek v obdobju preiskave v znatnih količinah uvožen iz Izraela ali Svazija.
Two unrelated EU importers disputed that the Chinese exporting producers selected for the sample represented 60 % of the total exports to the Union.
Dva nepovezana uvoznika iz EU se nista strinjala, da kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so bili izbrani za vzorec, predstavljajo 60 % celotnega izvoza v Unijo.
Three Chinese cooperating exporting producers submitted representations claimed that their related companies were exporting producers of the product concerned and should therefore be included in the Annex of cooperating exporting producers.
Trije kitajski sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki so predložili pripombe in trdili, da so njihove povezane družbe proizvajalci izvozniki zadevnega izdelka in bi zato morali biti vključeni v prilogo za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike.
One unrelated EU importer argued that exports made to the Union through traders should automatically be allowed to benefit from the measures applicable to the Chinese exporting producers.
En nepovezan uvoznik v EU je trdil, da je treba avtomatično omogočiti, da se za izvoz v Unijo prek trgovcev uporabljajo ukrepi, ki veljajo za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike.
In this respect, it is noted that anti-dumping measures are in the present case imposed on products manufactured by exporting producers in the country under investigation that are exported to the Union (irrespective of which company trades them) and not to business entities engaged only in trading activities.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so protidampinški ukrepi uvedeni za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo proizvajalci izvozniki v državi v preiskavi in se izvažajo v Unijo (ne glede na to, katera družba z njimi trguje), in ne za poslovne subjekte, ki sodelujejo le pri trgovanju.
In the absence of any relevant comments, recitals 29 to 33 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 29 do 33 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any relevant comments, recitals 34 to 37 of the provisional Regulation concerning individual treatment are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 34 do 37 začasne uredbe v zvezi z individualno obravnavo.
Comments of interested parties following the second reopening notice
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani po obvestilu o drugi obnovi
Certain importers argued that Chinese imports would be necessary to cover Union demand, although one importer indicated that Spanish and Turkish production together would be sufficient to cover the Union market needs.
Nekateri uvozniki so trdili, da bi bil uvoz iz Kitajske potreben za pokrivanje povpraševanja v Uniji, čeprav je en uvoznik navedel, da bi proizvodnja iz Španije in Turčije skupaj zadostovala za pokrivanje potreb trga Unije.
One importer remarked that imposition of anti-dumping duties would have resulted in significant increases in the price of the product concerned.
En uvoznik je pripomnil, da bi določitev protidampinške dajatve povzročila velika povečanja cene zadevnega izdelka.
Increase in prices were also mentioned by other importers.
Povečanje cen so omenili tudi drugi uvozniki.
Different factors were identified as cause for such increase like the decreasing availability of Chinese mandarins in the Union due to internal demand and demand from other markets, crop failures and labour shortage in the PRC.
Kot razlog za tako povečanje so bili navedeni različni dejavniki, na primer manjša razpoložljivost kitajskih mandarin v Uniji zaradi notranjega povpraševanja in povpraševanja z drugih trgov, manjši pridelek in pomanjkanje delovne sile v LRK.
Another factor indicated was the reduced competition in the Union (it is estimated that currently there are only three Union producers, while in 2000 there were eight).
Drugi navedeni dejavnik je bilo zmanjšanje konkurence v Uniji (ocenjuje se, da so trenutno v Uniji le trije proizvajalci, leta 2000 jih je bilo pa osem).
One importer complained that anti-dumping measures would favour large trading companies instead of the traditional ones, which have been trading the product concerned with the PRC for decades.
En uvoznik se je pritožil, da bi protidampinški ukrepi dajali prednost velikim trgovskim podjetjem namesto tradicionalnih, ki z LRK že desetletja trgujejo z zadevnim izdelkom.
This importer defends the existence of a license system based on pre-2001 data.
Ta uvoznik zagovarja obstoj sistema dovoljenj na podlagi podatkov izpred leta 2001.
A group of importers claimed that the Union institutions should initiate a whole new investigation instead of partially reopening the anti-dumping investigation which had resulted in the imposition of measures which had been in force until the analogue country judgment.
Skupina uvoznikov je trdila, da bi morale institucije Unije uvesti popolnoma novo preiskavo namesto delne obnove protidampinške preiskave, na podlagi katere so bili uvedeni ukrepi, ki so veljali do sodbe v primeru primerljive države.
This claim was based on the fact that those importers did not see sufficient evidence for dumping or injury in the present situation of the market.
Ta trditev je utemeljena na dejstvu, da tisti uvozniki v sedanjih razmerah na trgu niso videli dovolj dokazov za damping ali škodo.
Other importers submitted that they disagreed with the possible use of the IP data if a new dumping margin would needed to be calculated.
Drugi uvozniki so izjavili, da se ne strinjajo z morebitno uporabo podatkov OP, če bi bilo treba izračunati novo stopnjo dampinga.
According to those importers most recent data should be used and in particular the periods 2010-11 and 2011-12 were suggested.
Po mnenju navedenih uvoznikov bi bilo treba uporabiti novejše podatke, predlagali pa so zlasti obdobji 2010–2011 in 2011–2012.
A group of importers considered that the partial reopening of the investigation is in breach of Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Skupina uvoznikov je menila, da delna obnova preiskave krši člen 266 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
According to those importers, the case-law [12] mentioned in the second reopening Notice should be recalled only if measures are annulled or declared invalid due to an erroneous injury determination.
Navedeni uvozniki pravijo, da bi bilo treba sodno prakso [12], navedena v obvestilu o drugi obnovi, navajati le, če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni ali razglašeni za nične zaradi nepravilne določitve škode.
In their own words, ‘the Community institutions did not blunder at the stage of determining injury, but as early as assessing whether the products concerned were dumped at all’.
Po njihovih besedah, „institucije Skupnosti niso naredile napake pri določitvi škode, ampak pri oceni, ali je bil pri zadevnih izdelkih dejansko prisoten damping“.
As in this case the original Regulation was declared invalid due to the determination of normal value, the importers claimed that such case-law does not apply.
Ker je bila v tem primeru prvotna uredba razglašena za nično zaradi določitve normalne vrednosti, so uvozniki trdili, da se taka sodna praksa ne uporablja.
Finally, several importers recommended Turkey to be used as analogue country.
Več uvoznikov je tudi priporočilo, naj se kot primerljiva država uporablja Turčija.
At a hearing, one importer suggested contacting the authorities of Japan and Korea, as also in those countries there would also be companies which manufactured the like product during the IP.
Na zaslišanju je uvoznik predlagal kontaktiranje japonskih in korejskih organov, ker so tudi v navedenih državah družbe, ki so proizvajale podobni izdelek v OP.
Analysis of comments following the second reopening notice
Analiza pripomb po obvestilu o drugi obnovi.
As regards the many claims summarised under recital 38 above it should be underlined that the Commission decided to reopen the initial investigation in a limited manner, restricted to the possible identification of an analogue country.
V zvezi s številnimi trditvami, povzetimi v uvodni izjavi 38 zgoraj, bi bilo treba poudariti, da je Komisija sklenila obnoviti prvotno preiskavo, ki bi bila omejena na določitev primerljive države.
It did not define a new investigation period, contrary to the approach followed in the case that led to the judgment in Industrie des poudres sphériques v Council (Case C-458/98 P [2000] ECR I-8147).
V nasprotju s pristopom, ki ga je zavzela v zadevi, v kateri je bila sprejeta sodba Industrie des poudres sphériques proti Svetu (C-458/98 P, Recueil 2000, str. I-8147), ni določila novega obdobja preiskave.
This was based on the consideration that given that antidumping duties had been in place, any data collected during a new investigation period would have been distorted by the existence of these antidumping duties, in particular with regards to the establishment of injury.
To je bilo utemeljeno na pomisleku, da bi bili glede na to, da so bile sprejete protidampinške dajatve, vsi podatki, zbrani v novem obdobju preiskave, izkrivljeni zaradi teh protidampinških dajatev, zlasti kar zadeva določitev škode.
The Commission considers that the points raised by the parties on the alleged absence of dumping at the present point in time can be more appropriately discussed in the framework of an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija meni, da pripombe strani v zvezi z domnevno odsotnostjo dampinga v tem trenutku lahko bolje obravnava v okviru vmesnega pregleda na podlagi člena 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
Whereas in the initial investigation, the analysis on the existence of injury is carried out ex post for the investigation period, the analysis of injury during an interim review is done in a prospective manner, as the injury observed during the investigation period of the review is likely to be influenced by the fact that an antidumping duty is in place.
Ker je bila v prvotni preiskavi analiza obstoja škode opravljena naknadno za obdobje preiskave, je analiza škode v vmesnem pregledu pripravljena prospektivno, ker je na škodo, ugotovljeno v obdobju preiskave, verjetno vplivalo dejstvo, da je bila vzpostavljena protidampinška dajatev.
The parties concerned are reminded that if an importer or another party wants the measures to be fully reviewed, it has the possibility to request the initiation of an interim review, as prescribed in Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Zadevne strani so bile opozorjene, da ima uvoznik ali druga stran možnost, da lahko zahteva uvedbo vmesnega pregleda, kot je določeno v členu 11(3) osnovne uredbe, če želi, da se ukrepi v celoti pregledajo.
The parties concerned have that possibility at any time as the one-year period since the imposition of definitive measures referred to in Article 11(3) has elapsed.
Zadevne strani so lahko to možnost izkoristile kadar koli, ker je od uvedbe dokončnih ukrepov iz člena 11(3) minilo eno leto.
Any party that had lodged a request for review pursuant to Article 11(3) prior to the analogue country judgement will be contacted by the Commission services to determine whether it wishes to pursue its request.
Službe Komisije bodo stopile v stik z vsemi državami, ki so vložile zahtevek za pregled na podlagi člena 11(3) pred sodbo v primeru podobne države, da bi ugotovile, ali želi vztrajati pri svojem zahtevku.
Concerning the alleged illegality of the partial reopening, it should be noted that the mentioned case-law does not imply that a partial reopening might take place only if it concerns determination of the injury suffered by the Union industry.
V zvezi z domnevno nezakonitostjo delne obnove, bi bilo treba omeniti, da navedena sodna praksa ne zahteva, da lahko delna obnova poteka le, če zadeva določitev škode, ki jo je utrpela gospodarska panoga Unije.
What is clarified in Case T-2/95 and Case C-458/98 P is that ‘in the case of an act concluding an administrative proceeding which comprises several stages, its annulment does not necessarily entail the annulment of the entire procedure prior to the adoption of the contested act regardless of the grounds, procedural or substantive, of the judgment pronouncing the annulment’ [13].
V zadevi T-2/95 in v zadevi C-458/98 P je pojasnjeno, da „razglasitev ničnosti akta, ki pomeni konec večfaznega upravnega postopka, ne povzroči nujno ničnosti celotnega postopka pred sprejetjem izpodbijanega akta, neodvisno od obrazložitve, vsebine ali postopka v zvezi s sodbo, s katero je bila razglašena ničnost“ [13].
Therefore it is irrelevant whether the annulment or the declaration of invalidity of a regulation relates to the determination of injury or the determination of the normal value.
Zato je nepomembno, ali razglasitev ničnosti ali razveljavitev uredbe zadeva določitev škode ali določitev normalne vrednosti.
In respect of the use of IP data, it should be recalled that the second reopening Notice concerned a partial reopening of the original investigation and not a new investigation.
V zvezi z uporabo podatkov OP bi bilo treba spomniti, da je obvestilo o drugi obnovi zadevalo delno obnovo prvotne preiskave in ne nove preiskave.
Therefore, only data from the IP could be relevant and should be examined, even more so as the export prices used in the comparison would also be pertaining to that period.
Zato so lahko upoštevani le podatki OP, ki jih je treba preučiti, še zlasti, ker so iz navedenega obdobja tudi izvozne cene, ki se uporabljajo v primerjavi.
The claims for the use of more recent data, therefore, have to be dismissed.
Zahtevke po uporabi novejših podatkov je zato treba zavrniti.
Investigation following the second reopening notice
Preiskava po obvestilu o drugi obnovi
In the judgement referred to in recital 16 above, the Court specifically referred to four countries from which, according to Eurostat data, there would have been significant imports into the Union under the CN codes 20083055, 20083075 and ex20083090.
V sodbi iz uvodne izjave 16 Sodišče izrecno navaja štiri države, iz katerih bi po podatkih Eurostata prihajal velik del uvoza iz oznak KN 20083055, 20083075 in ex20083090 v Unijo.
These countries are Israel, Swaziland, Thailand and Turkey.
Te države so Izrael, Svazi, Tajska in Turčija.
In view of this, the Commission contacted the authorities of these countries via their Missions to the European Union.
Glede na to je Komisija stopila v stik z organi teh držav prek njihovih predstavništev pri Evropski uniji.
They were all contacted before the partial reopening of the investigation and again at the time of reopening.
Z vsemi je stopila v stik pred delno obnovo preiskave in ponovno ob obnovi.
The Missions concerned, as well the Delegations of the European Union to those four countries, were requested to identify possible domestic producers of the like product and, if any, to assist in obtaining their cooperation.
Zadevna predstavništva in tudi delegacije Evropske unije v navedenih štirih državah je pozvala, naj navedejo morebitne domače proizvajalce podobnega izdelka in, če obstajajo, pomagajo pri zagotovitvi njihovega sodelovanja.
Although been contacted twice, no replies were received from the Missions of Swaziland and Thailand to the European Union.
Čeprav je z njimi stopila v stik dvakrat, od predstavništev Svazija in Tajske pri Evropski uniji ni prejela odgovora.
Replies were received from the Missions of Israel and Turkey.
Odgovor je prejela od predstavništev Izraela in Turčije.
The Turkish Mission provided addresses of six alleged producers, while the Israeli Mission informed to the Commission services that there had been no production of the like product in Israel during the IP (and that there is currently no such production).
Predstavništvo Turčije je navedlo naslove šestih domnevnih proizvajalcev, izraelsko predstavništvo pa je obvestilo službe Komisije, da v Izraelu v OP ni bilo proizvodnje podobnega izdelka (in da trenutno ni nobene takšne proizvodnje).
All six Turkish producers were contacted, five of them twice.
Stik je bil vzpostavljen z vsemi šestimi turškimi proizvajalci, s petimi izmed njih dvakrat.
Three did not reply at all, and the other three informed the investigators that they were not producing the like product during the IP.
Trije sploh niso odgovorili, drugi trije pa so preiskovalce obvestili, da podobnega izdelka v obdobju preiskave niso proizvajali.
Therefore, although these companies offered to cooperate, they were not in a position to provide the Commission with the necessary data.
Zato navedene družbe, čeprav so ponudile sodelovanje, niso mogle zagotoviti Komisiji potrebnih podatkov.
This finding was corroborated by a submission received from a German importer with producing interests in Turkey, which stated that during the investigation period there was no production of the like product in Turkey.
To ugotovitev je potrdilo stališče nemškega uvoznika s proizvodnimi interesi v Turčiji, ki je izjavil, da v obdobju preiskave Turčija ni proizvajala podobnega izdelka.
Despite the absence of a reply from the Mission of Thailand, two Thai companies, from which updated addresses were obtained via the European Union Delegation in Bangkok, were also contacted, twice each.
Čeprav predstavništvo Tajske ni odgovorilo, pa je Komisija po dvakrat poskušala stopiti v stiki z dvema tajskima podjetjema, katerih posodobljene naslove je dobila prek Delegacije Evropske unije v Bangkoku.
Those two producers had already been contacted during the original investigation — but at the time, this had not resulted in their cooperation.
Navedena proizvajalca sta bila kontaktirana že v času prvotne preiskave, vendar takrat nista sodelovala.
Also this time, one of the producers did not reply at all to the two requests while the other replied it did not intend to cooperate in the investigation.
Tudi tokrat se eden od njiju sploh ni odzval na prošnji, drugi pa je odgovoril, da ne želi sodelovati v preiskavi.
Despite the efforts of the Commission via the Mission of Swaziland to the European Union and the Delegation of the European Union in Swaziland, it has not been possible to identify one or several producers in Swaziland.
Kljub prizadevanjem Komisije prek Predstavništva Svazija pri Evropski uniji in Delegacije Evropske unije v Svaziju, ni bilo mogoče v Svaziju najti nobenega proizvajalca.
In view of the suggestion referred to in recital 42 above, cooperation was also requested from the authorities of Japan and the Republic of Korea and in parallel the Delegations of the European Union in those countries were requested to identify local producers of the like product, if any.
Glede na predlog iz uvodne izjave 42, je Komisija za sodelovanje prosila tudi japonske in korejske organe, hkrati pa je prosila delegaciji Evropske unije v navedenih državah, naj navedeta morebitne lokalne proizvajalce podobnega izdelka.
The Korean authorities did not reply, but the Commission managed, through the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Korea, to obtain a name and address of a possible producer of the like product in the Republic of Korea.
Korejski organi niso odgovorili, vendar je Komisija prek Delegacije Evropske unije v Republiki Koreji uspela pridobiti ime in naslov morebitnega proizvajalca podobnega izdelka v Republiki Koreji.
This producer was contacted once but it did not reply to the request for cooperation.
S tem proizvajalcem je poskušala vzpostaviti stik, vendar se na prošnjo za sodelovanje ni odzval.
The Japanese authorities contacted possible Japanese producers, however, according to the Japanese authorities, those companies did not want to cooperate in the proceeding and also did not want their identities to be forwarded to the Commission.
Japonski organi so vzpostavili stik z morebitnimi japonskimi proizvajalci, vendar pa so povedali, da te družbe niso želele sodelovati v postopku in niso želele niti, da bi se podatki o njihovi istovetnosti posredovali Komisiji.
Conclusion on the investigation following the second reopening notice
Sklepna ugotovitev glede preiskave po obvestilu o drugi obnovi
Account taken of the comments made by the parties, the analysis thereof and, in spite of significant efforts by the Commission services, the lack of cooperation from potential third country producers, it was concluded that a normal value on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country as prescribed by Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation could not be determined.
Ob upoštevanju pripomb strani in njihove analize ter pomanjkanju sodelovanja morebitnih proizvajalcev iz tretjih držav, kljub velikim prizadevanjem služb Komisije, je bilo zaključeno, da normalne vrednosti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tržnem gospodarstvu tretje države, kot je določeno v členu 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, ni mogoče določiti.
Comments of interested parties following the imposition of provisional measures
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov
It is recalled that the normal value determination was based on the data provided by the Union Industry.
Opozoriti je treba, da je določitev normalne vrednosti temeljila na podatkih, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije.
This data was verified at the premises of the cooperating Union producers.
Ti podatki so bili preverjeni v prostorih sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, all three Chinese sampled cooperating exporting producers and two unrelated Union importers questioned the use of Union industry prices for the calculation of normal value.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so vsi trije kitajski vzorčeni sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki in dva nepovezana uvoznika iz Unije izrazili pomisleke o uporabi cen industrije Unije za izračun normalne vrednosti.
It was submitted that normal value should have been calculated on the basis of the PRC production costs account taken of any appropriate adjustments relating to the differences between the Union and the PRC markets.
Menili so, da bi bilo treba normalno vrednost izračunati na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov LRK ob upoštevanju kakršnih koli ustreznih prilagoditev, povezanih z razlikami med trgoma Unije in LRK.
Analysis of comments following the imposition of provisional measures
Analiza pripomb po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov
Conclusion on normal value
Sklepna ugotovitev glede normalne vrednosti
In the absence of any other comments and the fact that despite the significant efforts of the Commission services to identify a cooperating producer in an analogue country, it has not been possible to obtain data from an analogue country producer for the investigation period, recitals 38 to 45 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb in ker kljub temu, da so si službe Komisije zelo prizadevale, da bi poiskale sodelujočega proizvajalca v primerljivi državi, ni bilo mogoče dobiti podatkov proizvajalca iz primerljive države za obdobje preiskave, se uvodne izjave 38 do 45 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Moreover, given the late submission, this claim cannot be verified.
Poleg tega zahtevka glede na to, da je bil predložen pozno, ni mogoče preveriti.
Following this claim the Commission has nevertheless reviewed the amount of the cost in question account taken of the importance of this particular cost to the EU export transactions reported by the company.
Kljub temu je Komisija na podlagi tega zahtevka pregledala znesek zadevnih stroškov glede na to, da so ti stroški pomembni za izvozne transakcije EU, ki jih je navedla družba.
In the absence of any other comments in this respect, recital 46 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe v zvezi s tem, se potrdi uvodna izjava 46 začasne uredbe.