natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 21 December 2011, the Spanish authorities informed the Commission that their mackerel fishing quota for the year 2011 had not been fully used and requested the Commission to take the unutilised tonnage into account for the purpose of paying back the mackerel overfishing in 2010, as operated by Regulation (EU) No 165/2011.
Španski organi so dne 21. decembra 2011 obvestili Komisijo, da ribolovna kvota za skušo za leto 2011 ni bila v celoti porabljena, in od Komisije zahtevali, da neuporabljeno količino upošteva pri kompenziranju prelova skuše v letu 2010, kot ga določa Uredba (EU) št. 165/2011.
The unutilised quantity amounts to 5755 tonnes.
Neuporabljena količina znaša 5755 ton.
Spain, on the other hand, had requested, pursuant to Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 of 6 May 1996 introducing additional conditions for year-to-year management of TACs and quotas [3] that, within the limits indicated in that Regulation, part of their mackerel fishing quota for 2011 be withheld and transferred to the following year.
Po drugi strani je Španija v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 847/96 z dne 6. maja 1996 o uvedbi dodatnih pogojev za upravljanje celotnih dovoljenih ulovov (TAC) in kvot iz leta v leto [3] zahtevala, da se v skladu z omejitvami, določenimi v navedeni uredbi, del njene ribolovne kvote za skušo za leto 2011 zadrži in prenese v naslednje leto.
The amount of 3244 tonnes should be used to reschedule the deductions foreseen in Regulation (EU) No 165/2011.
Količino 3244 ton bi bilo treba uporabiti za reprogramiranje odbitkov, določenih v Uredbi (EU) št. 165/2011.
This quantity should be added to the 2011 deduction amount, which totalizes 7744, and simultaneously subtracted from the deduction amount of subsequent years.
Te količine bi bilo treba dodati k znesku odbitka za leto 2011, ki skupaj znaša 7744 ton, in hkrati odšteti od odbitka v naslednjih letih.
Regulation (EU) No 165/2011 should, therefore, be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (EU) št. 165/2011 bi bilo zato treba spremeniti –
The Annex to Regulation (EU) No 165/2011 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga k Uredbi (EU) št. 165/2011 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
OJ L 104, 14.4.2012, p. 2.
UL L 104, 14.4.2012, str. 2.
Initial quota 2010 [1]
Začetna kvota za 2010 [1]
Difference quota-catches
Razlika med kvoto in ulovi
(overfishing)
(prelov)
Multiplying factor of Article 105(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Množilni količnik iz člena 105(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009
(overfishing [1] 2)
(prelov [1] 2)
Deduction 2015 and, where appropriate, for subsequent years
Odbitek za 2015 in po potrebi za naslednja leta
Regulation (EU) No 53/2010’.
Uredba (EU) št. 53/2010.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 319/2012 of 13 April 2012 adding to the 2012 fishing quotas certain quantities withheld in the year 2011 pursuant to Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 [4] transferred 2511 tonnes of Spain’s 2011 unutilised mackerel fishing quota to the year 2012.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 319/2012 z dne 13. aprila 2012 o dodatku določenih količin, ki so bile leta 2011 zadržane v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 847/96 [4], ribolovnim kvotam za leto 2012 je v leto 2012 prenesla 2511 ton neuporabljene ribolovne kvote za skušo, dodeljene Španiji za leto 2011.
Hence, the remaining 2011 unutilised tonnage amounts to 3244.
Zato preostala neuporabljena količina za leto 2011 znaša 3244 ton.
Spain requested that the unutilised tonnage be subtracted from the 2013 and 2014 deduction amounts.
Španija je zahtevala, da se neuporabljena količina odšteje od zneskov odbitkov za leti 2013 in 2014.
This is compatible with the rationale expressed in recital 7 of Regulation (EU) No 165/2011.
To je v skladu z načelom, izraženim v uvodni izjavi 7 Uredbe (EU) št. 165/2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 977/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 977/2012
Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 978/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008
o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008
Since 1971, the Community has granted trade preferences to developing countries under its scheme of generalised tariff preferences.
Skupnost državam v razvoju od leta 1971 dodeljuje trgovinske preferenciale v okviru sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov.
The Union’s common commercial policy shall be guided by the principles and pursue the objectives set out in the general provisions on the Union’s external action, laid down in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Skupna trgovinska politika Unije temelji na načelih in uresničuje cilje iz splošnih določb o zunanjih ukrepih Unije in so navedene v členu 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
The Union aims to define and pursue common policies and actions in order to foster the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries, with the primary aim of eradicating poverty.
Cilj Unije je opredeliti in uresničevati skupne politike in ukrepe za pospeševanje trajnostnega gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega razvoja držav v razvoju s poglavitnim ciljem izkoreninjenja revščine.
The Union’s common commercial policy is to be consistent with and to consolidate the objectives of the Union policy in the field of development cooperation, laid down in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular the eradication of poverty and the promotion of sustainable development and good governance in the developing countries.
Skupna trgovinska politika Unije mora biti skladna s cilji Unije na področju politike razvojnega sodelovanja, določenimi v členu 208 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), in jih mora krepiti, zlasti izkoreninjenje revščine ter spodbujanje trajnostnega razvoja in dobrega upravljanja v državah v razvoju.
It is to comply with World Trade Organisation (WTO) requirements, in particular with the Decision on Differential and More Favourable Treatment, Reciprocity and Fuller Participation of Developing Countries (the ‘Enabling Clause’), adopted under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1979, under which WTO Members may accord differential and more favourable treatment to developing countries.
Biti mora v skladu z zahtevami Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), zlasti s Sklepom o različni in ugodnejši obravnavi, vzajemnosti in polnejšem sodelovanju držav v razvoju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: razvojna klavzula), sprejetim v skladu s Splošnim sporazumom o carinah in trgovini (GATT) iz leta 1979, v skladu s katerim lahko države članice STO državam v razvoju zagotovijo različno in ugodnejšo obravnavo.
The Commission Communication of 7 July 2004 entitled ‘Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community’s generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the 10-year period from 2006 to 2015’ sets out the guidelines for the application of the scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period 2006 to 2015.
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 7. julija 2004 z naslovom „Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: Vloga Splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) v desetletju 2006–2015“ določa smernice za uporabo sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov za obdobje 2006–2015.
Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 [2], as extended by Regulation (EU) No 512/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 [3] provides for the application of the scheme of generalised tariff preferences (‘the scheme’) until 31 December 2013 or until the scheme under this Regulation is applied, whichever is the earlier.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 z dne 22. julija 2008 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 [2], kot je bila podaljšana z Uredbo (EU) št. 512/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2011 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 [3], je določena uporaba sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: shema) do 31. decembra 2013 ali dokler se shema ne začne uporabljati v skladu s to uredbo.
Thereafter, the scheme should continue to apply for a period of 10 years from the date of application of the preferences provided for in this Regulation, except for the special arrangement for the least-developed countries, which should continue to be applied without any expiry date.
Po tem bi bilo treba shemo uporabljati za obdobje desetih let od dneva začetka veljavnosti preferencialov iz te uredbe, razen za posebni režim za najmanj razvite države, ki bi ga bilo treba še naprej uporabljati brez datuma izteka veljavnosti.
By providing preferential access to the Union market, the scheme should assist developing countries in their efforts to reduce poverty and promote good governance and sustainable development by helping them to generate additional revenue through international trade, which can then be reinvested for the benefit of their own development and, in addition, to diversify their economies.
Shema bi morala z zagotavljanjem prednostnega dostopa do trga Unije državam v razvoju pomagati pri njihovem prizadevanju za zmanjšanje revščine ter spodbujati dobro upravljanje in trajnostni razvoj, tako da jim prek mednarodne trgovine pomaga ustvarjati dodaten prihodek, ki se nato lahko ponovno vloži v njihov lastni razvoj, ter vzpostaviti tudi bolj raznolika gospodarstva.
The scheme’s tariff preferences should focus on helping developing countries having greater development, trade and financial needs.
Tarifne preferenciale sheme bi bilo treba usmeriti v pomoč tistim državam v razvoju, ki imajo večje razvojne, trgovinske in finančne potrebe.
The scheme consists of a general arrangement, and two special arrangements.
Shemo sestavljajo splošni režim in dva posebna režima.
The general arrangement should be granted to all those developing countries which share a common developing need and are in a similar stage of economic development.
Splošni režim bi bilo treba dodeliti vsem tistim državam v razvoju, ki imajo skupno razvojno potrebo in so na podobni ravni gospodarskega razvoja.
Countries which are classified by the World Bank as high-income or upper-middle income countries have per capita income levels allowing them to attain higher levels of diversification without the scheme’s tariff preferences.
Države, ki jih Svetovna banka uvršča med države z visokim ali višjim srednjim dohodkom, imajo stopnje dohodka na prebivalca, ki jim omogočajo doseganje višjih stopenj diverzifikacije brez tarifnih preferencialov sheme.
Those countries include economies which have successfully completed their transition from centralised to market economies.
Te države imajo gospodarstva, ki so uspešno zaključila prehod s centraliziranega na tržno gospodarstvo.
They do not share the same development, trade and financial needs as the remaining developing countries; they are at a different stage of economic development, i.e. they are not similarly-situated as the more vulnerable developing countries; and, in order to prevent unjustified discrimination, they need to be treated differently.
Nimajo enakih razvojnih, trgovinskih in finančnih potreb kot preostale države v razvoju; so na drugačni ravni gospodarskega razvoja, tj. niso v podobnem položaju kot ranljivejše države v razvoju, zato jih je treba, da bi se preprečila neupravičena diskriminacija, obravnavati drugače.
Furthermore, the use of tariff preferences provided under the scheme by high-income or upper-middle income countries increases the competitive pressure on exports from poorer, more vulnerable countries and therefore could impose unjustifiable burdens on those more vulnerable developing countries.
Poleg tega uporaba tarifnih preferencialov, zagotovljenih s shemo, v državah z visokim ali višjim srednjim dohodkom povečuje konkurenčni pritisk na izvoz iz revnejših in ranljivejših držav, kar bi lahko te ranljivejše države neupravičeno obremenilo.
The general arrangement takes account of the fact that the development, trade and financial needs are subject to change and ensures that the arrangement remains open if the situation of a country changes.
Splošni režim upošteva dejstvo, da se razvojne, trgovinske in finančne potrebe spreminjajo, in zagotavlja, da režim ostaja na voljo, če se položaj v državi spremeni.
For the sake of consistency, the tariff preferences granted under the general arrangement should not be extended to developing countries which are benefiting from a preferential market access arrangement with the Union, which provides at least the same level of tariff preferences as the scheme for substantially all trade.
Zaradi skladnosti se tarifni preferenciali, dodeljeni v okviru splošnega režima, ne bi smeli razširiti na države v razvoju, ki uživajo ugodnosti režima preferencialnega dostopa do trga Unije, ki zagotavlja vsaj enako stopnjo tarifnih preferencialov kot shema za praktično celotno trgovino.
To provide a beneficiary country and economic operators with time for an orderly adaptation, the general arrangement should continue to be granted for two years as from the date of application of a preferential market access arrangement and this date should be specified in the list of beneficiary countries of the general arrangement.
Da bi imeli države upravičenke in gospodarski subjekti dovolj časa za ustrezno prilagoditev, bi bilo treba splošni režim zagotavljati še dve leti od datuma začetka uporabe režima preferencialnega dostopa do trga, pri čemer bi bilo treba ta datum navesti na seznamu držav upravičenk do splošnega režima.
Countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 and countries benefiting from autonomous preferential access to the Union market under Regulation (EC) No 732/2008, Council Regulation (EC) No 55/2008 of 21 January 2008 introducing autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Moldova [4] and Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000 of 18 September 2000 introducing exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the European Union’s Stabilisation and Association process [5] should be considered eligible for the scheme.
Za države ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za upravičenost do sheme, bi se morale šteti države, navedene v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 732/2008, in države, ki uživajo ugodnosti avtonomnega preferencialnega dostopa do trga Unije v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 732/2008, Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 55/2008 z dne 21. januarja 2008 o uvedbi avtonomnih trgovinskih preferencialov za Republiko Moldavijo [4] ter Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2000 z dne 18. septembra 2000 o uvedbi izjemnih trgovinskih ukrepov za države in ozemlja, ki sodelujejo ali so povezana s stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenim procesom Evropske unije [5].
Overseas territories associated with the Union and overseas countries and territories of countries that are not listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 should not be considered eligible for the scheme.
Čezmorska ozemlja, povezana z Unijo, ter čezmorske države in ozemlja držav, ki niso navedeni v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 732/2008, se ne bi smeli obravnavati kot tista, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za upravičenost do sheme.
Preferences should be designed to promote further economic growth and, thereby, to respond positively to the need for sustainable development.
Preferenciali bi morali spodbuditi nadaljnjo gospodarsko rast in tako izpolnjevati potrebo po trajnostnem razvoju.
Under the special incentive arrangement, the ad valorem tariffs should therefore be suspended for the beneficiary countries concerned.
Na podlagi posebnega spodbujevalnega režima bi se torej morale za zadevne države upravičenke opustiti carinske stopnje ad valorem.
The specific duties should also be suspended, unless combined with an ad valorem duty.
Opustiti bi se morale tudi posebne dajatve, razen če so kombinirane z dajatvijo ad valorem.
Countries that fulfil the eligibility criteria for the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance should be able to benefit from the additional tariff preferences if, upon their application, the Commission determines that the relevant conditions are met.
Države, ki izpolnjujejo merila za upravičenost do posebnega spodbujevalnega režima za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje, bi morale uživati ugodnosti dodatnih tarifnih preferencialov, če Komisija po vložitvi njihovega zahtevka potrdi, da so zadevni pogoji izpolnjeni.
It should be possible to submit applications as from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Vložitev zahtevkov bi bilo treba omogočiti od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Countries which benefit from the tariff preferences of the scheme under Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 should also submit a new application.
Države, ki uživajo ugodnosti tarifnih preferencialov sheme v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 732/2008, bi morale prav tako vložiti nov zahtevek.
The Commission should monitor the status of ratification of the international conventions on human and labour rights, environmental protection and good governance and their effective implementation, by examining the conclusions and recommendations of the relevant monitoring bodies established under those conventions (the relevant monitoring bodies).
Komisija bi morala spremljati stanje ratifikacije mednarodnih konvencij o človekovih pravicah in pravicah delavcev, varstvu okolja in dobrem upravljanju ter njihovo učinkovito izvajanje, tako da bi preučila sklepne ugotovitve in priporočila zadevnih organov za spremljanje, ustanovljenih v skladu s temi konvencijami (zadevni organi za spremljanje).
Every two years, the Commission should present to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the status of ratification of the respective conventions, the compliance of the beneficiary countries with any reporting obligations under those conventions, and the status of the implementation of the conventions in practice.
Komisija bi morala Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsaki dve leti predložiti poročilo o stanju ratifikacije zadevnih konvencij, skladnosti držav upravičenk z morebitnimi obveznostmi poročanja iz teh konvencij in stanju izvajanja konvencij v praksi.
For the purposes of the monitoring and the withdrawal of preferences, reports from relevant monitoring bodies are essential.
Poročila zadevnih organov za spremljanje so bistvena za spremljanje in preklic preferencialov.
However, such reports may be supplemented by other sources of information, provided that they are accurate and reliable.
Vendar takšna poročila lahko dopolnjujejo drugi viri informacij, pod pogojem, da so točni in zanesljivi.
Without prejudice to other sources, this could include information from civil society, social partners, the European Parliament and the Council.
Brez poseganja v druge vire bi to lahko zajemalo informacije, ki jih pošljejo civilna družba, socialni partnerji, Evropski parlament in Svet.
The special arrangement for the least-developed countries should continue to grant duty-free access to the Union market for products originating in the least-developed countries, as recognised and classified by the UN, except for trade in arms.
Posebni režim za najmanj razvite države bi moral še naprej omogočati dajatev prost dostop do trga Unije za izdelke s poreklom iz držav, ki jih ZN priznavajo kot in uvrščajo med najmanj razvite države, razen za trgovino z orožjem.
For a country no longer classified by the UN as a least-developed country, a transitional period should be established, to alleviate any adverse effects caused by the removal of the tariff preferences granted under this arrangement.
Za državo, ki je ZN ne uvrščajo več med najmanj razvite države, bi bilo treba določiti prehodno obdobje za ublažitev morebitnih negativnih posledic, ki bi jih povzročila ukinitev tarifnih preferencialov, dodeljenih na podlagi tega režima.
Tariff preferences provided under the special arrangement for the least-developed countries should continue to be granted for those least-developed countries, which benefit from another preferential market access arrangement with the Union.
Tarifne preferenciale, določene v okviru posebnega režima za najmanj razvite države, bi bilo treba še naprej dodeljevati tistim najmanj razvitim državam, ki uživajo ugodnosti drugega režima preferencialnega dostopa do trga Unije določene v okviru posebnega spodbujevalnega režima
To ensure coherence with the market access provisions for sugar in the Economic Partnership Agreements, imports of products under heading 1701 of the Common Customs Tariff should require an import licence until 30 September 2015.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti z določbami o dostopu do trga za sladkor v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu bi bilo treba za uvoz izdelkov iz tarifne številke 1701 skupne carinske tarife do 30. septembra 2015 zahtevati uvozno dovoljenje.
As regards the general arrangement, the differentiation between tariff preferences for non-sensitive products and tariff preferences for sensitive products should be maintained, to take account of the situation of the sectors manufacturing the same products in the Union.
Kar zadeva splošni režim, bi bilo treba še naprej razlikovati med tarifnimi preferenciali za neobčutljive in občutljive izdelke, da se tako upošteva položaj v sektorjih, ki proizvajajo enake izdelke v Uniji.
Common Customs Tariff duties on non-sensitive products should continue to be suspended, while duties on sensitive products should enjoy a tariff reduction, in order to ensure a satisfactory utilisation rate while at the same time taking account of the situation of the corresponding Union industries.
Dajatve skupne carinske tarife za neobčutljive izdelke bi morale biti še naprej opuščene, medtem ko bi bilo treba dajatve za občutljive izdelke znižati, da se zagotovi zadovoljiva stopnja uporabe in se hkrati upošteva položaj ustreznih industrijskih sektorjev v Uniji.
Such a tariff reduction should be sufficiently attractive, in order to motivate traders to make use of the opportunities offered by the scheme.
Tako znižanje dajatev bi moralo biti dovolj privlačno, da bi trgovce spodbudilo k uporabi možnosti, ki jih ponuja shema.
Therefore, the ad valorem duties should generally be reduced by a flat rate of 3,5 percentage points from the ‘most favoured nation’ duty rate, while such duties for textiles and textile goods should be reduced by 20 %.
Zato bi bilo treba dajatve ad valorem na splošno znižati po pavšalni stopnji 3,5 odstotne točke glede na dajatev za države z največjimi ugodnostmi, medtem ko bi se morale takšne dajatve za tekstil in tekstilne izdelke znižati za 20 %.
Where a minimum duty is specified, that minimum duty should not apply.
Če je določena najnižja dajatev, se ta ne bi smela uporabljati.
Duties should be suspended totally, where the preferential treatment for an individual import declaration results in an ad valorem duty of 1 % or less or in a specific duty of EUR 2 or less, since the cost of collecting such duties might be higher than the revenue gained.
Dajatve bi bilo treba v celoti opustiti, kadar zaradi preferencialne obravnave dajatve ad valorem za posamezno uvozno deklaracijo znašajo 1 % ali manj ali posebna dajatev znaša 2 EUR ali manj, saj bi lahko bil strošek pobiranja takih dajatev višji od ustvarjenega prihodka.
Graduation should be based on criteria related to sections and chapters of the Common Customs Tariff.
Graduacija bi morala temeljiti na merilih, ki so povezana z oddelki in poglavji skupne carinske tarife.
Graduation should apply in respect of a section or subsection in order to reduce cases where heterogeneous products are graduated.
Graduacijo bi bilo treba uporabiti za oddelek ali pododdelek, da bi se zmanjšalo število primerov graduacije heterogenih izdelkov.