natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The purpose of IMI should be to improve the functioning of the internal market by providing an effective, user-friendly tool for the implementation of administrative cooperation between Member States and between Member States and the Commission, thus facilitating the application of Union acts listed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Namen IMI bi moral biti izboljšati delovanje notranjega trga z zagotavljanjem učinkovitega, uporabniku prijaznega orodja za izvajanje upravnega sodelovanja med državami članicami ter med državami članicami in Komisijo ter s tem olajšati uporabo aktov Unije, navedenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
The Commission Communication of 21 February 2011 entitled ‘Better governance of the Single Market through greater administrative cooperation: A strategy for expanding and developing the Internal Market Information System (“IMI”)’ sets out plans for the possible expansion of IMI to other Union acts.
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 21. februarja 2011 z naslovom „Boljše upravljanje enotnega trga prek izboljšanega upravnega sodelovanja: Strategija za širitev in razvoj informacijskega sistema za notranji trg (‚IMI‘)“ določa načrte za možno širitev IMI na druge akte Unije.
Where the application of a provision of a Union act requires Member States to exchange personal data and provides for the purpose of this processing, such a provision should be considered an adequate legal basis for the processing of personal data, subject to the conditions set out in Articles 8 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Kadar uporaba določbe akta Unije od držav članic zahteva izmenjavo osebnih podatkov in določa namen te obdelave, bi bilo treba takšno določbo šteti kot ustrezno pravno podlago za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ob upoštevanju pogojev iz členov 8 in 52 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
IMI should be seen primarily as a tool used for the exchange of information, including personal data, which would otherwise take place via other means, including regular mail, fax or electronic mail on the basis of a legal obligation imposed on Member States’ authorities and bodies in Union acts.
IMI bi bilo treba obravnavati predvsem kot orodje za izmenjavo informacij, vključno z osebnimi podatki, ki bi sicer na podlagi pravne obveznosti, določene v aktih Unije za organe in subjekte držav članic, potekala drugače, tudi po navadni pošti, telefaksu ali elektronski pošti.
Personal data exchanged via IMI should only be collected, processed and used for purposes in line with those for which it was originally collected and should be subject to all relevant safeguards.
Osebni podatki, izmenjani prek IMI, bi se morali zbirati, obdelovati in uporabljati le za namene, ki so skladni z nameni, za katere so bili prvotno zbrani, in bi morali biti v skladu z vsemi ustreznimi zaščitnimi ukrepi.
Following the privacy-by-design principle, IMI has been developed with the requirements of data protection legislation in mind and has been data protection-friendly from its inception, in particular because of the restrictions imposed on access to personal data exchanged in IMI.
V skladu z načelom vgrajene zasebnosti je bil IMI razvit ob upoštevanju zahtev iz zakonodaje o varstvu podatkov in že od zasnove vključuje mehanizme za varstvo podatkov, zlasti zaradi omejitev, ki so določene za dostop do osebnih podatkov, izmenjanih v IMI.
Therefore, IMI offers a considerably higher level of protection and security than other methods of information exchange such as regular mail, telephone, fax or electronic mail.
IMI zato zagotavlja znatno višjo raven varstva in varnosti kot druge metode izmenjave informacij, kot so običajna pošta, telefon, telefaks ali elektronska pošta.
Administrative cooperation by electronic means between Member States and between Member States and the Commission should comply with the rules on the protection of personal data laid down in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [3] and in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [4].
Upravno sodelovanje prek elektronskih sredstev med državami članicami ter med državami članicami in Komisijo bi moralo potekati v skladu s pravili o varstvu osebnih podatkov iz Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [3] ter Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [4].
The definitions used in Directive 95/46/EC and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 should also apply for the purposes of this Regulation.
Za namene te uredbe bi se morale uporabljati opredelitve pojmov iz Direktive 95/46/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001.
The Commission supplies and manages the software and IT infrastructure for IMI, ensures the security of IMI, manages the network of national IMI coordinators and is involved in the training of and technical assistance to the IMI users.
Komisija zagotavlja in upravlja programsko opremo in infrastrukturo IT za IMI, zagotavlja varnost IMI, upravlja mrežo nacionalnih koordinatorjev IMI ter sodeluje pri usposabljanju in zagotavljanju tehnične pomoči uporabnikom IMI.
To that end, the Commission should only have access to such personal data that are strictly necessary to carry out its tasks within the responsibilities set out in this Regulation, such as the registration of national IMI coordinators.
V ta namen bi morala Komisija imeti dostop le do tistih osebnih podatkov, ki so nujno potrebni za izvajanje njenih nalog v okviru pristojnosti, določenih v tej uredbi, kot je prijavljanje nacionalnih koordinatorjev IMI.
The Commission should also have access to personal data when retrieving, upon a request by another IMI actor, such data that have been blocked in IMI and to which the data subject has requested access.
Komisija bi morala imeti dostop do osebnih podatkov tudi, kadar na podlagi zahteve drugega udeleženca IMI prikliče osebne podatke, ki so bili v IMI blokirani in do katerih je posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo podatki, zaprosil za dostop.
The Commission should not have access to personal data exchanged as part of administrative cooperation within IMI, unless a Union act provides for a role for the Commission in such cooperation.
Komisija ne bi smela imeti dostopa do osebnih podatkov, izmenjanih v okviru upravnega sodelovanja v okviru IMI, razen če akt Unije ne določa vloge Komisije v takšnem sodelovanju.
In order to ensure transparency, in particular for data subjects, the provisions of Union acts for which IMI is to be used should be listed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za zagotovitev preglednosti, zlasti za posameznike, na katere se nanašajo podatki, bi bilo treba v Prilogi k tej uredbi navesti določbe aktov Unije, za katere se uporablja IMI.
IMI may be expanded in the future to new areas, where it can help to ensure effective implementation of a Union act in a cost-efficient, user-friendly way, taking account of technical feasibility and overall impact on IMI.
IMI se v prihodnosti lahko razširi na nova področja, na katerih bi lahko prispeval k učinkovitemu izvajanju aktov Unije na stroškovno učinkovit in uporabniku prijazen način, ob upoštevanju tehnične izvedljivosti in splošnega vpliva na IMI.
The Commission should conduct the necessary tests to verify the technical readiness of IMI for any envisaged expansion.
Komisija bi morala opraviti potrebne preskuse, da bi preverila, ali je IMI tehnično pripravljen na predvideno širitev.
Decisions to expand IMI to further Union acts should be taken by means of the ordinary legislative procedure.
Odločitve o širitvi IMI na druge akte Unije bi bilo treba sprejeti po rednem zakonodajnem postopku.
Pilot projects are a useful tool for testing whether the expansion of IMI is justified and for adapting technical functionality and procedural arrangements to the requirements of IMI users before a decision on the expansion of IMI is taken.
Pilotni projekti so koristno orodje za preverjanje, ali je širitev IMI upravičena, ter za prilagoditev tehnične funkcionalnosti in postopkovne ureditve zahtevam uporabnikov IMI, preden se sprejme odločitev o širitvi IMI.
Member States should be fully involved in deciding which Union acts should be subject to a pilot project and on the modalities of that pilot project, in order to ensure that the pilot project reflects the needs of IMI users and that the provisions on processing of personal data are fully complied with.
Države članice bi morale biti v celoti vključene v odločanje o tem, za katere akte Unije bi bilo treba izvesti pilotni projekt in na kakšen način, da se zagotovi, da pilotni projekt odraža potrebe uporabnikov IMI in da so določbe o obdelavi osebnih podatkov v celoti upoštevane.
Such modalities should be defined separately for each pilot project.
Tak način izvajanja bi bilo treba določiti za vsak pilotni projekt posebej.
Nothing in this Regulation should preclude Member States and the Commission from deciding to use IMI for the exchange of information which does not involve the processing of personal data.
Nobena določba v tej uredbi državam članicam in Komisiji ne bi smela preprečevati, da se odločijo uporabljati IMI za izmenjavo informacij, ki ne vključuje obdelave osebnih podatkov.
This Regulation should set out the rules for using IMI for the purposes of administrative cooperation, which may cover, inter alia, the one-to-one exchange of information, notification procedures, alert mechanisms, mutual assistance arrangements and problem-solving.
Ta uredba bi morala določati pravila za uporabo IMI za namene upravnega sodelovanja, ki lahko med drugim zajemajo izmenjavo informacij med dvema stranema, postopke uradnega obveščanja, mehanizme opozarjanja, dogovore o medsebojni pomoči in reševanje težav.
The right of the Member States to decide which national authorities carry out the obligations resulting from this Regulation should remain unaffected by this Regulation.
Ta uredba ne bi smela vplivati na pravico držav članic, da odločijo, kateri nacionalni organi izvajajo obveznosti na podlagi te uredbe.
Member States should be able to adapt functions and responsibilities in relation to IMI to their internal administrative structures, as well as to implement the needs of a specific IMI workflow.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da lahko prilagodijo naloge in pristojnosti v zvezi z IMI svojim notranjim upravnim strukturam ter upoštevajo zahteve specifičnega delovnega postopka IMI.
Member States should be able to appoint additional IMI coordinators to carry out the tasks of national IMI coordinators, alone or jointly with others, for a particular area of the internal market, a division of the administration, a geographic region, or according to another criterion.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da imenujejo dodatne koordinatorje IMI, ki sami ali skupaj z drugimi opravljajo naloge nacionalnih koordinatorjev IMI za določeno področje notranjega trga, organizacijsko enoto uprave, geografsko regijo ali v skladu z drugim merilom.
Member States should inform the Commission of the IMI coordinators they have appointed, but they should not be obliged to indicate additional IMI coordinators in IMI, where this is not required for its proper functioning.
Države članice bi morale obvestiti Komisijo o koordinatorjih IMI, ki so jih imenovale, ni pa treba, da v IMI navedejo dodatne koordinatorje IMI, če to ni potrebno za njegovo ustrezno delovanje.
In order to achieve efficient administrative cooperation through IMI, Member States and the Commission should ensure that their IMI actors have the necessary resources to carry out their obligations in accordance with this Regulation.
Da bi dosegli učinkovito upravno sodelovanje prek IMI, bi države članice in Komisija morale zagotoviti, da imajo njihovi udeleženci IMI potrebna sredstva za izvajanje svojih obveznosti v skladu s to uredbo.
While IMI is in essence a communication tool for administrative cooperation between competent authorities, which is not open to the general public, technical means may need to be developed to allow external actors such as citizens, enterprises and organisations to interact with the competent authorities in order to supply information or retrieve data, or to exercise their rights as data subjects.
IMI je v osnovi komunikacijsko orodje za upravno sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi, ki ni na voljo splošni javnosti, zato bo morda treba razviti tehnična sredstva, ki bodo omogočala, da bodo zunanji udeleženci, kot so državljani, podjetja in organizacije, lahko komunicirali s pristojnimi organi za namene pošiljanja informacij ali priklica podatkov ali uveljavljali pravice, ki jih imajo kot posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo podatki.
Such technical means should include appropriate safeguards for data protection.
Takšna tehnična sredstva bi morala vključevati ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za varstvo podatkov.
In order to ensure a high level of security, any such public interface should be developed in such a way as to be technically fully separate from IMI, to which only IMI users should have access.
Za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varnosti bi bilo treba vsak tovrsten javni vmesnik razviti tako, da bi bil tehnično v celoti ločen od IMI, do katerega bi morali imeti dostop le uporabniki IMI.
While IMI includes an internet-based interface for its users, in certain cases and at the request of the Member State concerned, it may be appropriate to consider technical solutions for the direct transfer of data from national systems to IMI, where such national systems have already been developed, notably for notification procedures.
Medtem ko IMI vsebuje spletni vmesnik za uporabnike, bi v nekaterih primerih in na zahtevo zadevne države članice lahko razmislili o tehničnih rešitvah neposrednega prenosa podatkov iz nacionalnih sistemov v IMI, kadar takšni nacionalni sistemi že obstajajo, zlasti za postopke uradnega obveščanja.
The implementation of such technical solutions should depend on the outcome of an assessment of their feasibility, costs and expected benefits.
Izvedba takšne tehnične rešitve bi morala biti odvisna od ocene njene izvedljivosti, stroškov in pričakovanih koristi.
Those solutions should not affect the existing structures and the national order of competencies.
Te rešitve ne bi smele vplivati na obstoječe strukture in nacionalno ureditev pristojnosti.
Where Member States have fulfilled the obligation to notify under Article 15(7) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market [6] by using the procedure in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services [7], they should not also be required to make the same notification through IMI.
Če so države članice izpolnile obveznost glede uradnega obveščanja iz člena 15(7) Direktive 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu [6] po postopku v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov o storitvah informacijske družbe [7], jim ne bi bilo treba ponovno opraviti postopka uradnega obveščanja prek IMI.
The exchange of information through IMI follows from the legal obligation on Member States’ authorities to give mutual assistance.
Izmenjava podatkov prek IMI izhaja iz pravne obveznosti organov držav članic za zagotavljanje medsebojne pomoči.
To ensure that the internal market functions properly, information received by a competent authority through IMI from another Member State should not be deprived of its value as evidence in administrative proceedings solely on the ground that it originated in another Member State or was received by electronic means, and it should be treated by that competent authority in the same way as similar documents originating in its Member State.
Za zagotovitev ustreznega delovanja notranjega trga informacije, ki jih pristojni organ prejme prek IMI od druge države članice, ne bi smele biti brez dokazne vrednosti v upravnih postopkih zgolj zato, ker izhajajo iz druge države članice ali so bile prejete po elektronski poti, pristojni organ pa bi jih moral obravnavati enako kot podobne listine iz svoje države članice.
In order to guarantee a high level of data protection, maximum retention periods for personal data in IMI need to be established.
Za zagotovitev visoke ravni varstva podatkov je treba določiti najdaljše roke hrambe osebnih podatkov v IMI.
However, those periods should be well-balanced taking into due consideration the need for IMI to function properly, as well as the rights of the data subjects to fully exercise their rights, for instance by obtaining evidence that an information exchange took place in order to appeal against a decision.
Vendar bi morali biti ti roki uravnoteženi in ustrezno upoštevati potrebo po dobrem delovanju IMI kakor tudi pravice posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo podatki, da v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice, na primer s pridobitvijo dokaza, da je potekala izmenjava informacij, da se lahko pritožijo zoper odločitev.
In particular, retention periods should not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of this Regulation.
Zlasti roki hrambe ne bi smeli biti daljši, kot je potrebno za uresničevanje ciljev te uredbe.
It should be possible to process the name and contact details of IMI users for purposes compatible with the objectives of this Regulation, including monitoring of the use of the system by IMI coordinators and the Commission, communication, training and awareness-raising initiatives, and gathering information on administrative cooperation or mutual assistance in the internal market.
Treba bi bilo omogočiti obdelavo imen in kontaktnih podatkov uporabnikov IMI za namene, ki so združljivi s cilji te uredbe, vključno s spremljanjem uporabe sistema s strani koordinatorjev IMI in Komisije, komuniciranjem, usposabljanjem in pobudami za ozaveščanje ter zbiranjem informacij o upravnem sodelovanju ali medsebojni pomoči na notranjem trgu.
The European Data Protection Supervisor should monitor and seek to ensure the application of this Regulation, inter alia by maintaining contacts with national data protection authorities, including the relevant provisions on data security.
(24) Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov bi moral spremljati in skušati zagotavljati uporabo te uredbe, med drugim z vzdrževanjem stikov z nacionalnimi organi za varstvo podatkov, vključno z ustreznimi določbami o varnosti podatkov.
In order to ensure the effective monitoring of, and reporting on, the functioning of IMI and the application of this Regulation, Member States should make relevant information available to the Commission.
Za učinkovito spremljanje delovanja IMI in poročanje o tem ter uporabo te uredbe bi morale države članice Komisiji zagotoviti ustrezne informacije.
Data subjects should be informed about the processing of their personal data in IMI and of the fact that they have the right of access to the data relating to them and the right to have inaccurate data corrected and illegally processed data erased, in accordance with this Regulation and national legislation implementing Directive 95/46/EC.
Posameznike, na katere se nanašajo podatki, bi bilo treba obvestiti, da se njihovi podatki obdelujejo v IMI in da imajo v skladu s to uredbo in nacionalno zakonodajo, ki izvaja Direktivo 95/46/ES, pravico dostopa do podatkov, ki se nanje nanašajo, in pravico, da zahtevajo, da se nepravilni podatki popravijo, nezakonito obdelani pa izbrišejo.
In order to make it possible for the competent authorities of the Member States to implement legal provisions for administrative cooperation and efficiently exchange information by means of IMI, it may be necessary to lay down practical arrangements for such an exchange.
Da bi pristojni organi držav članic lahko izvajali pravne določbe o upravnem sodelovanju in učinkovito izmenjavali informacije prek IMI, bi bilo morda treba določiti praktične rešitve za takšno izmenjavo.
Those arrangements should be adopted by the Commission in the form of a separate implementing act for each Union act listed in the Annex or for each type of administrative cooperation procedure and should cover the essential technical functionality and procedural arrangements required to implement the relevant administrative cooperation procedures via IMI.
Te rešitve bi morala sprejeti Komisija v obliki ločenega izvedbenega akta za vsak akt Unije, naveden v Prilogi, ali za vsako vrsto postopka upravnega sodelovanja, zajemati pa bi morale osnovno tehnično funkcionalnost in postopkovno ureditev, potrebni za izvajanje ustreznih postopkov upravnega sodelovanja prek IMI.
The Commission should ensure the maintenance and development of the software and IT infrastructure for IMI.
Komisija bi morala skrbeti za vzdrževanje in razvoj programske opreme in infrastrukture IT za IMI.
In order to ensure sufficient transparency for data subjects, the predefined workflows, question and answer sets, forms and other arrangements relating to administrative cooperation procedures in IMI should be made public.
Za zagotovitev zadostne preglednosti za posameznike, na katere se nanašajo podatki, bi bilo treba objaviti vnaprej določene delovne postopke, nabor vprašanj in odgovorov, obrazce in druge rešitve v zvezi s postopki upravnega sodelovanja v IMI.
Where Member States apply, in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 95/46/EC, any limitations on or exceptions to the rights of data subjects, information about such limitations or exceptions should be made public in order to ensure full transparency for data subjects.
Kadar države članice v skladu s členom 13 Direktive 95/46/ES predvidijo omejitve ali izjeme za pravice posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo podatki, bi bilo treba informacije o takšnih omejitvah ali izjemah objaviti, da se zagotovi popolna preglednost za posameznike, na katere se nanašajo podatki.
Such exceptions or limitations should be necessary and proportionate to the intended purpose and subject to adequate safeguards.
Takšne izjeme ali omejitve bi morale biti nujne in sorazmerne s predvidenim namenom ter bi zanje morali veljati ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi.
Where international agreements are concluded between the Union and third countries that also cover the application of provisions of Union acts listed in the Annex to this Regulation, it should be possible to include the counterparts of IMI actors in such third countries in the administrative cooperation procedures supported by IMI, provided that it has been established that the third country concerned offers an adequate level of protection of personal data in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC.
Če Unija s tretjimi državami sklene mednarodne sporazume, ki zajemajo tudi uporabo določb aktov Unije, navedenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi, bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se partnerji udeležencev IMI v teh tretjih državah vključijo v postopke upravnega sodelovanja, pri katerih se uporablja IMI, pod pogojem, da je bilo ugotovljeno, da zadevna tretja država zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES.
Commission Decision 2008/49/EC of 12 December 2007 concerning the implementation of the Internal Market Information System (IMI) as regards the protection of personal data [8] should be repealed.
Odločbo Komisije 2008/49/ES z dne 12. decembra 2007 o izvajanju informacijskega sistema za notranji trg (IMI) v zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov [8] bi bilo treba razveljaviti.