natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes the failure to select candidates in connection with the invitation to tender for the Konrad Adenauer Building project because the proposed prices submitted in response to the invitation to tender were very much higher than the estimates;
ugotavlja, da ni bil izbran noben ponudnik, ki se je prijavil na javni razpis za projekt stavbe Konrad Adenauer, ker so bile predlagane cene precej višje od ocenjenih;
supports the decision by the authorising officer by delegation not to award the contract;
podpira odločitev odredbodajalca na podlagi prenosa, da se naročilo ne odda;
expects the global price of the project not to exceed the EUR 482,7 million anticipated in October 2011;
pričakuje, da skupna cena projekta ne bo presegla 482,7 milijona EUR, kot je bilo predvideno oktobra 2011;
Notes in this respect that all contracts promoted by Parliament related to construction of buildings and fitting out works should be put to tender on the broadest possible base, and always at European level;
v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba za vsa naročila na področju gradnje in opreme stavb, ki jih podpira Parlament, omogočiti izbiro med ponudbami najširšega možnega kroga ponudnikov in vedno na evropski ravni;
recommends that, if, by way of exception, the negotiated procedure is used, prices should be based on construction costs, including strict reasonable margins for the economic operators;
priporoča, da se v izjemnem primeru postopka s pogajanji cene določijo na osnovi gradbenih stroškov, vključno s primernimi maržami za gospodarske subjekte;
Regrets that, for the second time, structural defects have been discovered in Parliament’s buildings, this time in the wooden ceiling beams of Parliament’s Brussels Chamber;
obžaluje, da so bile že drugič ugotovljene napake v konstrukciji stavb Parlamenta, tokrat v lesenih tramovih v stropih sejne dvorane v Bruslju;
calls on DG INLO to make a full review of the structural situation of all of Parliament’s buildings starting with those ones which still are guaranteed by the project developer against hidden faults, if possible with the support of a few selected experts from the national building offices of different Members States, making full use of in-house accumulated knowledge;
poziva generalni direktorat za infrastrukturo in logistiko, naj pripravi izčrpen pregled stanja vseh stavb Parlamenta, začenši s tistimi, za katere še vedno velja garancija nosilca projekta za skrite napake, po možnosti s podporo nekaterih izbranih strokovnjakov iz nacionalnih gradbenih uradov v različnih državah članicah in s popolnim izkoristkom znanja notranjih strokovnjakov;
calls on the Secretary-General to present a plan to the Bureau soon with all the technical details for these works plus the costs involved;
poziva generalnega sekretarja, naj predsedstvu kmalu predloži načrt z vsemi tehničnimi podrobnostmi za ta dela in predvidenimi stroški;
Emphasises that it is essential that public procurement processes are consistent with and help to meet Parliament’s needs;
poudarja, da morajo biti postopki za javna naročila usklajeni s potrebami Parlamenta in prispevati k njihovem zadovoljevanju;
stresses that they should comply with the regulatory requirements and the fundamental principles governing public procurement, with the contract provisions and with the criteria used in the tender evaluation procedure, and be subject to adequate control systems to monitor the execution of orders issued using the framework contracts;
poudarja, da bi morali biti ti postopki usklajeni z regulativnimi zahtevami in temeljnimi načeli, ki urejajo javna naročila, ter s pogodbenimi določili in merili, ki se uporabljajo v postopku ocenjevanja ponudb, ter da bi bilo treba te postopke spremljati z ustreznimi kontrolnimi sistemi, namenjenimi nadzoru nad izvrševanjem izdanih naročil z okvirnimi pogodbami;
Draws attention to the fact that, during public procurement procedures, different interest are involved, but not always aligned between the public and the private sector and that public procurement is a high-risk area which requires continuous close attention and where constant advanced planning of the needs is critical;
poudarja, da se med postopki javnega naročanja pojavljajo različni interesi med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem in da so javna naročila izjemno tvegano področje, ki vedno zahteva veliko pozornost in pri katerem je ključnega pomena stalno zgodnje načrtovanje potreb;
Stresses that, as a result of a complex legal environment and highly complex factual necessities, there are, at each stage of the procurement process (initially assessing needs, preparing the call for tender, drawing up the calls for tender and the specifications, contacting tenderers, opening of tenders, evaluating tenders, taking the award decision, concluding contracts) significant risks to the achievement of objectives;
poudarja, da obstaja zaradi zapletenega pravnega okolja in dejanskih potreb v vseh fazah postopka javnega naročanja (začetna opredelitev potreb, priprave na javni razpis, sestavljanje javnih razpisov in specifikacij, stiki s ponudniki, odpiranje ponudb, ocenjevanje ponudb, sprejemanje odločitve o izbiri, sklepanje pogodb) precejšnje tveganje, da se cilji ne dosežejo;
Recalls that during public procurement the likelihood of potential conflicts of interest should not be dismissed but addressed properly and that Parliament should reinforce and maintain in place its verification mechanisms to enable a proper management and prevention of potential conflicts of interest;
opozarja, da ne bi smeli zanemariti verjetnosti morebitnih navzkrižij interesov, ki se lahko pojavijo med postopkom javnega naročanja, ampak bi jo morali ustrezno obravnavati, in da bi moral Parlament okrepiti in ohraniti mehanizme preverjanja, da bi omogočil ustrezno obvladovanje in preprečevanje morebitnih navzkrižij interesov;
points out that that tender specifications are by nature highly complex in that they combined multiple lots, technical profiles and contract implementation methods;
poudarja, da so razpisne specifikacije same po sebi zelo zapletene, saj so sestavljene iz več sklopov, tehničnih profilov in metod za izvajanje pogodbe;
Welcomes the fact that the abovementioned audit concluded that DG ITEC has succeeded in remedying many of the procedural deficiencies observed during the first transversal audit of procurement in 2005 and 2006;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bilo na podlagi omenjene revizije ugotovljeno, da je generalni direktorat za inovacije in tehnološko podporo uspešno odpravil veliko postopkovnih pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene med prvo prečno revizijo javnih naročil leta 2005 in 2006;
notes with regret, however, that the following shortcomings were identified:
vendar obžaluje, da so bile ugotovljene naslednje pomanjkljivosti:
that there were inefficiencies in the complex approach to the ITS 08 procurement procedure,
da je bil celoviti pristop, uporabljen v postopku javnega naročanja ITS 08, neučinkovit;
that there is significant scope for increasing the proportion of IT services provided off-site, and
da je še vedno treba precej povečati delež storitev informacijske tehnologije, opravljenih zunaj institucije, ter
that the recourse to exceptional negotiated procedures needs to be better substantiated and that the outcome of negotiation is based on documented analyses that are measurable against relevant value-for-money benchmarks;
da je treba bolje utemeljiti uporabo izrednih postopkov s pogajanji in zagotoviti, da izid pogajanj temelji na dokumentiranih analizah, ki so primerljive z ustreznimi merili stroškovne učinkovitosti;
Annual report on contracts awarded
Letno poročilo o oddanih naročilih
Notes that central services established, on the basis of information provided by authorising departments, the annual report to the budgetary authority on contracts awarded in 2011 and further notes the following breakdown of all contracts awarded in 2011 and 2010:
ugotavlja, da so osrednje službe na podlagi informacij, ki so jih posredovale odredbodajalske službe, za proračunski organ pripravile letno poročilo o dodeljenih naročilih v letu 2011, in se seznanja z naslednjo razčlenitvijo vseh naročil, dodeljenih v letih 2011 in 2010:
Type of contract
Vrsta naročila
Percentage
Delež
Value (EUR)
Vrednost (EUR)
(Annual report on the contracts awarded by the European Parliament, 2011, p. 5)
(Letno poročilo o oddanih naročilih Evropskega parlamenta za leto 2011, str. 5)
Notes the breakdown of contracts awarded in 2011 and 2010 by type of procedure used as follows:
ugotavlja, da je razčlenitev naročil v letih 2011 in 2010 po vrsti uporabljenega postopka naslednja:
Open
Odprti postopek
Restricted
Omejeni postopek
Negotiated
Postopek s pogajanji
Competition
Konkurenčni dialog
Exception
Izjema
(Annual report on the contracts awarded by the European Parliament, 2011, pp. 6-7)
(Letno poročilo o dodeljenih naročilih Evropskega parlamenta za leto 2011, str. 6 in 7)
Notes that of a total of 238 contracts awarded in 2011, 100, with a value of EUR 535 million, were based on open or restricted procedures, and 133, with a value of EUR 31 million, were based on negotiated procedures;
ugotavlja, da je bilo v letu 2011 oddanih 238 naročil, pri čemer je 100 naročil v vrednosti 535 milijonov EUR temeljilo na odprtih ali omejenih postopkih, 133 naročil v vrednosti 31 milijonov EUR pa na pogajanjih;
Political Groups (budget item 400)
Politične skupine (proračunska postavka 400)
Notes that, in 2011, the appropriations entered under budget item 400 were used as follows:
ugotavlja, da so bila v letu 2011 sredstva iz proračunske postavke 400 uporabljena takole:
After the European elections in 2009 the UEN and IND/DEM groups ceased to exist and two new groups ECR and EFD were created.
Po evropskih volitvah leta 2009 sta skupini UEN in IND/DEM prenehali obstajati, ustanovljeni pa sta bili dve novi skupini ECR in EFD.
Annual appropriations [17]
Letna proračunska sredstva [17]
Own resources and carried-over appropriations
Lastna sredstva in prenesena proračunska sredstva
Rate of use of annual appropriations
Odstotek porabe letnih proračunskih sredstev
Amounts carried over to next period
Zneski, ki se prenesejo v naslednje obdobje
Annual appropriations
Letna proračunska sredstva
Amounts carried over to next period (2011)
Zneski, ki se prenesejo v naslednje obdobje (2011)
EPP (formerly EPP-ED)
PPE (prej PPE-ED)
S&D (formerly PSE)
S&D (prej PSE)
European Political Parties and European Political Foundations
Evropske politične stranke in evropske politične ustanove
Notes that, in 2011, the appropriations entered under budget item 402 were used as follows [18]:
ugotavlja, da so bila v letu 2011 sredstva iz proračunske postavke 402 uporabljena takole [18]:
Own resources [19]
Lastna sredstva [19]
EP grant
Subvencija EP
Total revenue
Prihodki – skupaj
EP grant as % of eligible expenditure (max. 85 %)
Subvencija EP v % upravičenih odhodkov (maks. 85 %)
Revenue surplus (transfer to reserves) or loss
Presežek (prenos v rezervo) ali izguba
European People’s Party
Evropska ljudska stranka
Party of European Socialists
Stranka evropskih socialistov
European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party
Evropska stranka liberalcev, demokratov in reformistov
European Green Party
Evropska stranka zelenih
Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists
Zveza evropskih konservativcev in reformistov
of the European Left
0Stranka evropske levice
European Democratic Party
Evropska demokratska stranka
Free Alliance
svobodna zveza
EUDemocrats
Demokrati EU
European Christian Political Movement
Evropsko krščansko politično gibanje
European Alliance for Freedom
Evropska zveza za svobodo
Notes that, in 2011, the appropriations entered under budget item 403 were used as follows [20]:
ugotavlja, da so bila v letu 2011 sredstva iz proračunske postavke 403 uporabljena takole [20]:
Foundation
Ustanova
Affiliated to party
Pridružena stranki
Own resources [21]
Lastna sredstva [21]
Centre for European Studies
Center za evropske študije
Foundation for European Progressive Studies
Fundacija za evropske progresivne študije
European Liberal Forum
Evropski liberalni forum
Green European Foundation
Zelena evropska fundacija
Institute of European Democrats
Inštitut evropskih demokratov
Organisation For European Interstate Cooperation
Organizacija za evropsko meddržavno sodelovanje
Centre Maurits Coppieters
Center Mauritsa Coppietersa
New Direction
Nova smer
European Christian Political Foundation
Evropska krščanska politična fundacija
European Foundation for Freedom
Evropska fundacija za svobodo
Environment-friendly Parliament
Okolju prijazen Parlament
Takes note that that the Parliament has 10 service bicycles available for Members and staff during the Strasbourg sessions, in addition to the 40 bicycles made available by the city of Strasbourg;
je seznanjen, da ima Parlament na voljo 10 koles za poslance in uslužbence, ki jih lahko uporabljajo med zasedanji v Strasbourgu, 40 koles pa je zagotovilo mesto Strasbourg;
reiterates it’s request that these figures should experience a reasonable increase in view of the limited costs involved and strong demand;
ponovno poziva, naj se to število bistveno poveča glede na majhne stroške in veliko povpraševanje;
Takes the view that the possibility should be considered of making both environmental improvements and smart savings in Parliament’s budget by means of different working methods and modern technologies which are greener and cheaper but which do not detract from Parliament’s work, including the use of teleconferences;
meni, da bi bilo treba razmisliti o možnosti hkratnega okoljskega napredka in pametnih prihrankov v proračunu Parlamenta, tako da bi uporabili drugačne delovne metode in moderne tehnologije, ki so okolju prijaznejše in cenejše, dela Parlamenta pa ne omejujejo, vključno z uporabo konferenc na daljavo;
Would like to be informed about the total kWh produced by Parliament’s solar panels;
želi biti obveščen o celotni količini kWh, ki jo Parlament proizvede s solarnimi ploščami;
Reiterates its support for the pilot project on E-committee;
ponavlja svojo podporo pilotnemu projektu za e-odbor;
strongly suggests that Members should be given the option in this context to choose whether or not to receive paper documentation in Committee meetings in order to significantly reduce the use of paper in Parliament.
predlaga, da se poslancem omogoči izbira, ali želijo na sejah odborov prejemati dokumentacijo v papirni obliki ali ne, da bi bistveno zmanjšali porabo papirja v Parlamentu.
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2013)0048.
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2013)0048.
Report on budgetary and financial management — Section I — European Parliament — Financial year 2011 (OJ C 164, 9.6.2012, p. 1).
Poročilo o upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju – oddelek I – Evropski parlament – proračunsko leto 2011 (UL C 164, 9.6.2012, str. 1).
Automatic carry-overs:
Samodejni prenosi:
EUR 231028630, non-automatic carry-overs:
231028630 EUR, nesamodejni prenosi:
Direct visits per month on the website:
Neposredni ogledi spletnega mesta na mesec:
The figures in 2011:
Podatki za leto 2011:
the figures in 2010:
podatki za leto 2010:
All amounts in thousand EUR.
Vsi zneski so v tisoč EUR.
Bureau minutes (i) of 26 June 2012, point 34 (SG note D(2012)31558, PE469.487/BUR) and (ii) of 30 August 2012, point 26 (SG note D(2012)42643.
zapisnik predsedstva i) z dne 26. junija 2012, točka 34 (obvestilo GS D(2012)31558, PE469.487/BUR) in ii) z dne 30. avgusta 2012, točka 26 (obvestilo GS D(2012)42643.
Bureau minutes (i) of 26 June 2012, point 34 (SG note D(2012)31558, PE469.487/BUR) and (ii) of 30 August 2012, point 26 (SG noteD(2012)42643.
zapisnik predsedstva i) z dne 26. junija 2012, točka 34 (obvestilo GS D(2012)31558, PE469.487/BUR) in ii) z dne 30. avgusta 2012, točka 26 (obvestilo GS D(2012)42643.
Report on budgetary and financial management [12]19. Notes that in 2011, Parliament received revenue amounting to EUR 173293432 (EUR 243094204 in 2010) which included EUR 23815077 in assigned revenue;
Poročilo o upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju [12]19. ugotavlja, da so v letu 2011 prihodki Parlamenta znašali 173293432 EUR (243094204 EUR v letu 2010), kar je vključevalo 23815077 EUR namenskih prejemkov;
Notes that, in 2011 and 2012, the Internal Audit Service carried out a comprehensive audit of the public procurement process and of contract implementation in DG ITEC and that the final report adopted on June 2012 comprised a six-point action plan to address the issues raised;
ugotavlja, da je služba za notranjo revizijo leta 2011 in 2012 izvedla celovito revizijo postopka za javna naročila in izvajanja pogodbe v generalnem direktoratu za inovacije in tehnološko podporo ter da je končno poročilo, sprejeto junija 2012, vsebovalo akcijski načrt za obravnavanje zadevnih vprašanj v šestih točkah;
notes further that it was agreed with DG ITEC’s management that that action plan would be implemented by 31 December 2012;
prav tako ugotavlja, da je bil z vodstvom generalnega direktorata za inovacije in tehnološko podporo sprejet dogovor, da se ta akcijski načrt izvede do 31. decembra 2012;
DG ITEC Parliament’s Information technology policy
Politika informacijske tehnologije Parlamenta
Acknowledges that a new methodology, similar to provisions adopted by the Commission, was established in 2011 for the survey and procurement of property; notes that under the new methodology transparency and competition will be further strengthened through the publication of procurement-related documents in the Official Journal;
priznava, da je bila leta 2011 pripravljena nova metodologija za popis in javno naročanje nepremičnin, ki je podobna določbam, ki jih je sprejela Komisija, ugotavlja, da bosta z novo metodologijo dodatno okrepljeni preglednost in konkurenčnost, saj bodo v Uradnem listu objavljeni dokumenti, povezani z javnimi naročili;
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2011, Section II — European Council and Council
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet
having regard to the European Union general budget for the financial year 2011 [1],having regard to the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 (COM(2012) 436 – C7-0226/2012) [2],having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on implementation of the budget for the financial year 2011, together with the institutions’ replies [3],having regard to the statement of assurance [4] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2011 pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,having regard to Article 314(10) and Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 [1],ob upoštevanju konsolidiranega zaključnega računa Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 (COM(2012) 436 – C7-0226/2012) [2],ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2011 z odgovori institucij [3],ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti [4] računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je za proračunsko leto 2011 v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pripravilo Računsko sodišče,ob upoštevanju člena 314(10) ter členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Articles 50, 86, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [6], and in particular Articles 164, 165 and 166 thereof,having regard to Decision No 31/2008 of the Secretary-General of the Council/High-Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy concerning reimbursement of travel expenses of delegates of Council Members [7],having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [8],having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], zlasti členov 50, 86, 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [6], zlasti členov 164, 165 in 166 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju sklepa generalnega sekretarja Sveta/visokega predstavnika za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko št. 31/2008 o povračilu potnih stroškov predstavnikom članov Sveta [7],ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [8],ob upoštevanju člena 77 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0061/2013),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor (A7-0061/2013),
Postpones its decision on granting the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Council’s and the Council’s budget for the financial year 2011;
odloži podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega sveta in Sveta za proračunsko leto 2011;
Sets out its observations in the Resolution below;
navaja svoje pripombe v spodnji resoluciji;
Instructs its President to forward this Decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the European Council, the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Auditors, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in priloženo resolucijo posreduje Evropskemu svetu, Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropske unije, Računskemu sodišču, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Decision stemming from the Rules of Procedure of the Council of 22 July 2002 (OJ L 230, 28.8.2002, p. 7).
Sklep na osnovi poslovnika Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 (UL L 230, 28.8.2002, str. 7).
with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2011, Section II — European Council and Council
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011, oddelek II – Evropski svet in Svet
A. whereas the conclusions of the European Council of 18 and 19 October 2012 pointed out that ‘democratic legitimacy and accountability should be further explored’,
A. ker je Evropski svet na seji 18. in 19. oktobra 2012 v svojih sklepih opozoril, da bi bilo treba demokratično legitimnost in odgovornost še dodatno preučiti;
B. whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control is for the first time analysing the European Council’s implementation and management of its administrative budget,
B. ker parlamentarni Odbor za proračunski nadzor prvič analizira izvrševanje in upravljanje upravnega proračuna Evropskega sveta;
C. whereas all Union institutions ought to be transparent and fully accountable to the citizens of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union institutions,
C. ker bi morale vse institucije Unije poslovati pregledno in biti v celoti odgovorne državljanom Unije za porabo sredstev, ki so jim bila zaupana kot institucijam Unije;