natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Professional qualifications obtained under common training frameworks should automatically be recognised by Member States.
Poklicne kvalifikacije, pridobljene na podlagi skupnih okvirov za usposabljanje, bi morale države članice avtomatično priznati.
Professional organisations which are representative at Union level and, under certain circumstances, national professional organisations or competent authorities should be able to submit suggestions for common training principles to the Commission, in order to allow for an assessment with the national coordinators of the possible consequences of such principles for the national education and training systems, as well as for the national rules governing access to regulated professions.
Poklicne organizacije, ki so reprezentativne na ravni Unije, in, pod določenimi pogoji, nacionalne poklicne organizacije ali ustrezni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da Komisiji predložijo predloge za skupna načela usposabljanja, da bi z nacionalnimi koordinatorji lahko izvedli ocene možnih posledic teh načel za nacionalne sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter za nacionalne predpise o urejanju dostopa do reguliranih poklicev.
Directive 2005/36/EC already provides for the obligation for professionals to have the necessary language skills.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES že določa obveznosti za strokovnjake, ki morajo imeti potrebno jezikovno znanje.
The review of the application of that obligation has shown a need to clarify the role of competent authorities and employers, in particular in the interest of better ensuring patient safety.
Pregled izpolnjevanja te obveznosti je pokazal potrebo po pojasnitvi vloge pristojnih organov in delodajalcev, zlasti zaradi boljšega zagotavljanja varnosti bolnikov.
Competent authorities should be able to apply language controls after recognition of professional qualifications.
Pristojni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da po priznanju poklicne kvalifikacije preverijo znanje jezika.
It is important for professions that have patient safety implications in particular that language controls under Directive 2005/36/EC be applied before the professional accesses the profession in the host Member State.
Zlasti za poklice, ki vplivajo na varnost bolnikov, je pomembno, da se, preden se strokovnjaku omogoči dostop do poklica v državi članici gostiteljici, preveri znanje jezika v skladu z Direktivo 2005/36/ES.
Language controls should however be reasonable and necessary for the professions in question and should not aim at excluding professionals from other Member States from the labour market in the host Member State.
Vendar bi moralo biti preverjanje jezikovnega znanja razumno in potrebno za zadevne poklice ter ne bi smelo biti namenjeno izključitvi strokovnjakov iz drugih držav članic s trga dela v državi članici gostiteljici.
In order to ensure respect of the principle of proportionality, and in the interests of enhancing the mobility of professionals in the Union, the controls carried out by, or under the supervision of, a competent authority should be limited to the knowledge of one official language of the host Member State, or one administrative language of the host Member State, provided that it is also an official language of the Union.
Za zagotovitev spoštovanja načela sorazmernosti in v interesu povečanja mobilnosti strokovnjakov v Uniji bi moralo biti preverjanje, ki ga neposredno izvede pristojni organ, ali se izvede pod njegovim nadzorom, omejeno na znanje enega uradnega ali enega upravnega jezika države članice gostiteljice, če je ta upravni jezik tudi uradni jezik Unije.
This should not preclude host Member States from encouraging professionals to acquire another language at a later stage if necessary for the professional activity to be pursued.
To državi članici gostiteljici ne bi smelo preprečiti spodbujati strokovnjakov, da se pozneje naučijo še enega jezika, če je to potrebno za opravljanje načrtovane poklicne dejavnosti.
Employers should also continue to play an important role in ascertaining the knowledge of languages necessary to carry out professional activities in their workplaces.
Delodajalci bi morali še naprej imeti pomembno vlogo pri ugotavljanju, kateri jeziki so potrebni za opravljanje poklicne dejavnosti na njihovih delovnih mestih.
National rules organising the access to regulated professions should not constitute an obstacle to the mobility of young graduates.
Nacionalni predpisi, ki so namenjeni urejanju dostopa do reguliranih poklicev, ne bi smeli predstavljati ovire za mobilnost mladih diplomantov.
Therefore, when a graduate completes a professional traineeship in another Member State, the traineeship in question should be recognised when the graduate applies for accessing a regulated profession in the home Member State.
Zato bi bilo treba v primeru, ko diplomant opravi poklicno prakso v drugi državi članici, to prakso priznati, ko diplomant vloži prošnjo za dostop do reguliranega poklica v državi članici izvora.
The recognition of a professional traineeship completed in another Member State should be based on a clear written description of learning objectives and assigned tasks, to be determined by the trainee’s supervisor in the host Member State.
Priznanje poklicne prakse, opravljene v drugi državi članici, bi moralo temeljiti na jasnem pisnem opisu učnih ciljev in dodeljenih nalog, ki jih določi mentor praktikanta v državi članici gostiteljici.
Professional traineeships completed in third countries should be taken into account by Member States when considering a request to access a regulated profession.
Države članice naj bi pri obravnavi vloge za dostop do reguliranega poklica upoštevale opravljene poklicne prakse v tretjih državah.
Directive 2005/36/EC provides for a system of national contact points.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES uvaja sistem nacionalnih kontaktnih točk.
Due to the entry into force of Directive 2006/123/EC and the establishment of points of single contact under that Directive, there is a risk of overlap.
Zaradi začetka veljavnosti Direktive 2006/123/ES ter vzpostavitve enotnih kontaktnih točk na podlagi te direktive obstaja nevarnost prekrivanja.
Therefore, the national contact points established by Directive 2005/36/EC should become assistance centres which should focus their activities on providing advice and assistance to citizens, including face-to-face advice, in order to ensure that the daily application of internal market rules in complex individual cases of citizens is followed up at national level.
Zato bi morale nacionalne kontaktne točke, vzpostavljene z Direktivo 2005/36/ES, postati centri za pomoč, ki bi se morali osredotočati na nudenje nasvetov in pomoči državljanom, tudi z osebnimi srečanji, s čimer bi zagotovili, da se dnevna uporaba pravil notranjega trga v zapletenih posameznih primerih državljanov spoštuje na nacionalni ravni.
Where necessary, the assistance centres would liaise with competent authorities and assistance centres of other Member States.
Po potrebi bi se centri za pomoč povezali s pristojnimi organi in centri za pomoč drugih držav članic.
In respect of the European Professional Card, Member States should be free to decide whether the assistance centres are either to act as a competent authority in the home Member State or to support the relevant competent authority in the handling of applications for a European Professional Card and processing of the applicant’s individual file created within IMI (IMI file).
Glede evropske poklicne izkaznice bi morale države članice imeti možnost same odločiti o tem, ali bodo centri za pomoč delovali kot pristojni organ v državi članici izvora ali pa bodo pomagali pristojnemu organu pri obravnavi vlog za evropsko poklicno izkaznico in obdelavi posamezne datoteke prosilca, oblikovane v IMI (v nadaljnjem besedilu: datoteka IMI).
In the context of free provision of services, if the profession concerned is not regulated in the home Member State, the assistance centres may also participate in the exchange of information envisaged for the purpose of administrative cooperation.
Če zadevni poklic ni reguliran v državi članici izvora, lahko v okviru prostega opravljanja storitev centri za pomoč sodelujejo tudi pri izmenjavi informacij, ki so namenjene upravnemu sodelovanju.
This Directive contributes to ensuring a high level of health and consumer protection.
Ta direktiva prispeva k zagotovitvi visoke ravni zdravja in varstva potrošnikov.
Directive 2005/36/EC already provides for detailed obligations for Member States to exchange information.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES že določa podrobne obveznosti držav članic glede izmenjave informacij.
Those obligations should be reinforced.
Te obveznosti bi bilo treba okrepiti.
In future, Member States should not only react to requests for information but their competent authorities should also be empowered within the boundaries of their competences to proactively alert the competent authorities of other Member States about professionals who are no longer entitled to practise their profession.
V prihodnje se države članice ne bi smele samo odzivati na zahteve po informacijah, temveč bi morali biti njihovi pristojni organi tudi pooblaščeni, da v okviru svojih pristojnosti proaktivno opozarjajo pristojne organe drugih držav članic o strokovnjakih, ki svojega poklica ne smejo več opravljati.
A specific alert mechanism is necessary for health professionals under Directive 2005/36/EC.
Poseben sistem opozarjanja je v skladu z Direktivo 2005/36/ES nujen za zdravstvene delavce.
This should also apply to veterinary surgeons as well as to professionals exercising activities relating to the education of minors, including professionals working in childcare and early childhood education.
To bi moralo veljati tudi za veterinarje ter za strokovnjake, ki opravljajo dejavnosti v zvezi z izobraževanjem mladostnikov, vključno s strokovnjaki v vzgoji in zgodnjem izobraževanju.
The obligation to send an alert should apply only to the Member States where such professions are regulated.
Obveznost opozarjanja bi morala veljati samo za države članice, v katerih so ti poklici regulirani.
All Member States should be alerted if a professional is no longer entitled, due to a disciplinary action or criminal conviction, to practise, even temporarily, the professional activities in a Member State.
Vse države članice bi morale biti opozorjene, če strokovnjak zaradi disciplinskega ukrepa ali kazenske obsodbe ne sme več, niti začasno, opravljati poklicnih dejavnosti v državi članici.
The alert should contain any available details of the definite or indefinite period to which the restriction or prohibition applies.
Opozorilo bi moralo vsebovati vse razpoložljive podrobnosti o določenem ali nedoločenem času, v katerem velja omejitev ali prepoved.
This alert should be activated through IMI regardless of whether the professional has exercised any of the rights under Directive 2005/36/EC or has applied for recognition of his professional qualifications through the issuance of a European Professional Card or through any other method provided for by that Directive.
To opozorilo bi moralo biti sproženo prek IMI ne glede na to, ali je strokovnjak uveljavljal kakšno od pravic na podlagi Direktive 2005/36/ES oziroma ali je vložil prošnjo za priznanje njegovih poklicnih kvalifikacij z izdajo evropske poklicne izkaznice ali prek druge metode, določene z navedeno direktivo.
The alert procedure should comply with Union law on the protection of personal data and fundamental rights.
Postopek opozarjanja bi moral biti skladen s pravom Unije o varstvu osebnih podatkov in temeljnih pravicah.
The alert procedure should not be designed to replace or adapt any arrangements between Member States on cooperation in the field of justice and home affairs.
Postopek opozarjanja ne bi smel nadomestiti ali prilagoditi dogovorov med državami članicami o sodelovanju na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev.
Competent authorities under Directive 2005/36/EC should also not be required to contribute to such cooperation via alerts provided for under that Directive.
Prav tako se od pristojnih organov iz Direktive 2005/36/ES ne bi smelo zahtevati, da sodelujejo pri tem opozarjanju, ki je določeno z navedeno direktivo.
One of the major difficulties faced by a citizen who is interested in working in another Member State is the complexity and uncertainty of administrative procedures with which they have to comply.
Ena od velikih težav, s katero se sooči državljan, ki želi delati v drugi državi članici, je zahtevnost in negotovost upravnih postopkov, v skladu s katerimi mora ravnati.
Directive 2006/123/EC already obliges Member States to provide easy access to information and to make it possible to complete procedures through the points of single contact.
Direktiva 2006/123/ES od držav članic že zahteva, da zagotovijo enostaven dostop do informacij in možnost zaključiti postopek prek enotnih kontaktnih točk.
Citizens seeking recognition of their professional qualifications under Directive 2005/36/EC can already use the points of single contact if they are covered by Directive 2006/123/EC.
Če za državljane, ki zaprosijo za priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij na podlagi Direktive 2005/36/ES, velja Direktiva 2006/123/ES, lahko že uporabijo enotne kontaktne točke.
However, job seekers and health professionals are not covered by Directive 2006/123/EC and available information remains scarce.
Vendar pa za iskalce zaposlitve in zdravstvene delavce Direktiva 2006/123/ES ne velja, razpoložljive informacije pa so skope.
There is therefore a need, from the user’s perspective, to specify that information and to ensure that such information is easily available.
Zato je treba z vidika uporabnika te informacije navesti in zagotoviti, da je dostop do njih enostaven.
It is also important that Member States not only take responsibility at national level but also cooperate with each other and the Commission to ensure that professionals throughout the Union have easy access to user-friendly and multilingual information and are able to easily complete procedures through the points of single contact or the relevant competent authorities.
Države članice morajo prevzeti odgovornost na nacionalni ravni, pa tudi sodelovati med seboj in s Komisijo ter tako zagotoviti, da imajo strokovnjaki po vsej Uniji enostaven dostop do uporabniku prijaznih, večjezičnih informacij in lahko na preprost način zaključijo postopke prek enotnih kontaktnih točk ali ustreznih pristojnih organov.
Links should be made available through other websites, such as the Your Europe portal.
Na drugih spletnih straneh, na primer na portalu Tvoja Evropa, bi bilo treba dodati spletne povezave.
In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of Directive 2005/36/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the updating of knowledge and skills referred to in Article 21(6), the updating of Annex I, the updating and clarifying the activities listed in Annex IV, the adaptations of points 5.1.1 to 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 and 5.7.1 of Annex V, adapting the minimum periods of training of medical and dental specialists, the inclusion in point 5.1.3 of Annex V of new medical specialties, the amendments to the list set out in points 5.2.1, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1 and 5.6.1 of Annex V, the inclusion in point 5.3.3 of Annex V of new dental specialties, specifying the conditions of application of common training frameworks, and specifying the conditions of application of common training tests.
Da bi dopolnili ali spremenili nekatere nebistvene določbe Direktive 2005/36/ES, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastila, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi s posodobitvijo znanj in veščin iz člena 21(6), posodobitvijo Priloge I, posodobitvijo in razjasnitvijo dejavnosti iz Priloge IV, spremembo točk 5.1.1 do 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 in 5.7.1 Priloge V, prilagoditvijo minimalnih obdobij za specialistično medicinsko usposabljanje in specialistično zobozdravstveno usposabljanje, vključitvijo novih zdravniških specializacij v točko 5.1.3 Priloge V, spremembo seznamov iz točk 5.2.1, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1 in 5.6.1 Priloge V, ter vključitvijo novih zobozdravniških specializacij v točko 5.3.3 Priloge V, določanjem pogojev uporabe skupnih okvirov za usposabljanje in določanjem pogojev uporabe skupnih preizkusov usposobljenosti.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
Zlasti je pomembno, da Komisija med svojim pripravljalnim delom opravi ustrezna posvetovanja, vključno na ravni strokovnjakov.
The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Komisija bi morala pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov zagotoviti, da se ustrezni dokumenti predložijo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu istočasno, pravočasno in na ustrezen način.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 2005/36/EC, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev izvajanja Direktive 2005/36/ES bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila.
Due to the technical nature of those implementing acts, the examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts concerning the introduction of European Professional Cards for particular professions, the format of the European Professional Card, the processing of written applications, the translations to be provided by the applicant to support any application for a European Professional Card, details of documents required under Directive 2005/36/EC to present a complete application, procedures for making and processing payments for that Card, rules for how, when and for which documents competent authorities may request certified copies for the profession concerned, the technical specifications and the measures necessary to ensure integrity, confidentiality and accuracy of information contained in the European Professional Card and in the IMI file, the conditions and the procedures for issuing a European Professional Card, rules concerning the conditions of access to the IMI file, the technical means and the procedures for the verification of the authenticity and validity of a European Professional Card, and the application of the alert mechanism.
Zaradi tehnične narave navedenih izvedbenih aktov bi bilo treba uporabiti postopek pregleda za sprejetje izvedbenih aktov glede uvedbe evropskih poklicnih izkaznic za določene poklice, oblike evropske poklicne izkaznice, obdelave pisnih prošenj, prevodov, ki jih mora prosilec predložiti za podporo prošnji za evropsko poklicno izkaznico, podrobnosti dokumentov, ki so v skladu z Direktivo 2005/36/ES potrebni za vložitev popolne prošnje, postopkov za izvedbo in obdelavo plačil za to izkaznico, pravil kako, kdaj in za katere dokumente lahko pristojni organi zahtevajo overjene kopije za zadevni poklic, tehničnih specifikacij in ukrepov, potrebnih za zagotavljanje celovitosti, zaupnosti in točnosti informacij na evropski poklicni izkaznici in v datoteki IMI, pogojev in postopkov za izdajo evropske poklicne izkaznice, pravil glede pogojev za dostop do datoteke IMI, tehničnih sredstev in postopkov za preverjanje pristnosti in veljavnosti evropske poklicne izkaznice ter uporabe mehanizma za opozarjanje.
The Commission should, by means of implementing acts and, given their specific features, acting without the application of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, decide to reject a requested update of Annex I where the conditions set out in Directive 2005/36/EC are not fulfilled, ask the relevant Member State to refrain from applying the derogation as regards the choice between the adaptation period and aptitude test where that derogation is inappropriate or is not in accordance with Union law, reject requested amendments of points 5.1.1 to 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 or 5.7.1 of Annex V where the conditions set out in Directive 2005/36/EC are not fulfilled, list the national professional qualifications and national professional titles benefiting from automatic recognition under common training framework, list the Member States in which the common training tests are to be organised, the frequency during a calendar year and other arrangements necessary for organising common training tests, and permit the Member State concerned to derogate from the relevant provisions of Directive 2005/36/EC for a limited period of time.
Komisija bi morala z izvedbenimi akti in, ob upoštevanju njihovih posebnih značilnosti, brez uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 zavrniti zahtevano posodobitev Priloge I, kadar pogoji iz Direktive 2005/36/ES niso izpolnjeni, prositi zadevno državo članico, naj ne uporabi odstopanja glede izbire med prilagoditvenim obdobjem in preizkusom poklicne usposobljenosti, kadar to odstopanje ni primerno ali ni v skladu s pravom Unije, zavrniti zahtevane spremembe točk 5.1.1 do 5.1.4, 5.2.2, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, 5.4.2, 5.5.2, 5.6.2 ali 5.7.1 Priloge V, kadar pogoji iz Direktive 2005/36/ES niso izpolnjeni, pripraviti seznam nacionalnih poklicnih kvalifikacij in nacionalnih poklicnih nazivov, ki koristijo avtomatično priznavanje v okviru skupnega okvira za usposabljanje, pripraviti seznam držav članic, v katerih bodo organizirani skupni preizkusi usposobljenosti, ter seznam pogostosti v koledarskem letu in drugih dogovorov, ki so potrebni za izvedbo skupnih preizkusov usposobljenosti, ter zadevnim državam članicam za določen čas dovoliti odstopanje od ustreznih določb Direktive 2005/36/ES.
Following the positive experience with the mutual evaluation under Directive 2006/123/EC, a similar evaluation system should be included in Directive 2005/36/EC.
Na podlagi pozitivnih izkušenj z medsebojnim ocenjevanjem v okviru Direktive 2006/123/ES bi bilo treba podoben sistem ocenjevanja vključiti tudi v Direktivo 2005/36/ES.
Member States should notify which professions they regulate, for which reasons, and discuss amongst themselves their findings.
Države članice bi morale priglasiti poklice, ki jih regulirajo, in navesti razloge za njihovo reguliranje, o svojih ugotovitvah pa razpravljati med seboj.
Such a system would contribute to more transparency in the professional services market.
Tak sistem bi pripomogel k večji preglednosti na trgu poklicnih storitev.
The Commission should in due course assess the recognition regime applicable to the evidence of formal qualifications as a nurse responsible for general care issued in Romania.
Komisija bi morala v določenem času oceniti sistem priznavanja, ki se uporablja za dokazila o formalnih kvalifikacijah za medicinske sestre za splošno zdravstveno nego, izdana v Romuniji.
Such an assessment should be based on the results of a special upgrading programme, which Romania should set up in accordance with its national laws, regulations and administrative provisions, and for which it should liaise with other Member States and the Commission.
Takšna ocena bi morala temeljiti na rezultatih posebnega dopolnilnega programa, ki bi ga morala Romunija ustanoviti v skladu s svojimi nacionalnimi zakoni in drugimi predpisi in za katerega bi morala stopiti v stik z drugimi državami članicami in Komisijo.
The purpose of such special upgrading programme should be to enable participants in that programme to upgrade their professional qualification to successfully satisfy all the minimum training requirements set out in Directive 2005/36/EC.
Namen takšnega posebnega dopolnilnega programa bi moral omogočiti udeležencem programa, da nadgradijo svoje poklicne kvalifikacije, da bodo uspešno izpolnili vse minimalne zahteve usposabljanja, določene v Direktivi 2005/36/ES.