natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although profitability dropped by 66 % during the period considered, the sampled producers managed to achieve profits over the whole period considered.
Čeprav je dobičkonosnost v obravnavanem obdobju padla za 66 %, je vzorčenim proizvajalcem v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju uspelo doseči dobiček.
The profits achieved from 2008 to the RIP were above the target profit of 3 % set in the latest investigation.
Dobiček, dosežen med letom 2008 in OPP je bil nad ciljnim dobičkom, določenim v zadnji preiskavi, ki je znašal 3 %.
2008 was a very good year with high profits.
Leto 2008 je bilo zelo uspešno leto z velikimi dobički.
In 2009 and also in 2010 profitability dropped by 50 % compared to the previous year, but in the RIP profitability raised again by 35 % compared to 2010 and was 6,6 %.
Leta 2009 in tudi leta 2010 je dobičkonosnost padla za 50 % v primerjavi s prejšnjim letom, v OPP pa se je dobičkonosnost znova povečala za 35 % v primerjavi z letom 2010 in je znašala 6,6 %.
The Union industry managed to adapt to the decreased demand in the EU and was helped by the sustained global demand for the sampled producers that enabled them to dilute fix costs.
Zaradi stalnega svetovnega povpraševanja po izdelkih vzorčenih proizvajalcev, kar je slednjim omogočalo zmanjšanje stalnih stroškov, se je industriji Unije uspelo prilagoditi zmanjšanemu povpraševanju v EU.
The drop in profitability after 2008 is explained by the economic downturn which resulted in a significant drop of demand, a drop in prices and by a decrease in production volume which had a negative impact on cost of production.
Dobičkonosnost je po letu 2008 padla zaradi gospodarske recesije, ki je povzročila znaten padec povpraševanja, padec cen in zmanjšanje obsega proizvodnje, kar je negativno vplivalo na stroške proizvodnje.
Profitability on the Union market (%)
Dobičkonosnost na trgu Unije (%)
The return on investments (ROI), expressed as the total profit generated by the SPT activity as a percentage of the net book value of assets directly and indirectly related to the production of SPT, broadly followed the above profitability trends over the whole period considered and remained positive during the whole period considered.
Donosnost naložb, izražena kot celoten dobiček, ustvarjen iz dejavnosti brezšivnih cevi, v odstotkih čiste knjigovodske vrednosti sredstev, neposredno in posredno povezan s proizvodnjo brezšivnih cevi, je sledila navedenemu trendu dobičkonosnosti v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju in je v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju ostala pozitivna.
The ROI dropped by 80 % during the period considered but in the RIP increased again by 50 % compared to 2010.
Donosnost naložb je v obravnavanem obdobju padla za 80 %, v OPP pa je v primerjavi z letom 2010 znova narasla za 50 %.
The cash-flow situation deteriorated significantly between 2008 and the RIP, as it dropped with 93 %.
Likvidnostni položaj se je znatno poslabšal med letom 2008 in OPP, saj je nazadoval za 93 %.
The trend in cash flow did not evolve in line with the trend in profitability which could be explained by the cost of depreciation, which is typically high for this capital intensive industry.
Denarni tok se ni razvijal enako kot dobičkonosnost, kar je mogoče pojasniti s stroški amortizacije, ki so običajno visoki za to kapitalsko intenzivno industrijo.
Cash flow (EUR 1000)
Denarni tok (v 1000 EUR)
While the indicators examined above show that the Union industry suffered from the economic downturn as sales volume, production volume, ROI and cash flow went down, they also indicate that the Union industry adapted its production equipment to better face the new economic environment and be able to seize opportunities on Union and non-Union markets, in particular in segments where high margins can be achieved.
Zgoraj proučeni kazalci hkrati kažejo, da je industrija Unije utrpela škodo zaradi gospodarske recesije, saj so se obseg prodaje, obseg proizvodnje, donosnost naložb in denarni tok znižali, ter da je industrija Unije prilagodila svojo proizvodno opremo novemu gospodarskemu okolju, da bo lahko izkoristila priložnosti na trgih Unije in na trgih zunaj Unije, zlasti v segmentih, kjer je mogoče doseči visoke stopnje.
The improvement in the economic and financial situation of the Union industry, further to the imposition of anti-dumping measures in 2006 against imports from the countries concerned and in 2009 against imports from the People’s Republic of China, shows that the measures are effective and that the Union industry recovered from the effects of past dumping practices, though no longer reaches the profitability level of 2008.
Izboljšanje gospodarskega in finančnega položaja industrije Unije po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov leta 2006 za uvoz iz zadevnih držav in leta 2009 za uvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske kaže, da so ukrepi učinkoviti in da je IU okrevala po učinkih preteklih dampinških praks, čeprav ni več dosegla ravni dobičkonosnosti iz leta 2008.
Although consumption decreased by 34 %, the Union industry managed to increase its market share, and production volume and sales volume decreased less than consumption.
Čeprav se je potrošnja industrije Unije zmanjšala za 34 %, ji je uspelo povečati tržni delež, obseg proizvodnje in obseg prodaje pa sta se zmanjšala manj kot potrošnja.
In terms of profitability, the Union industry was profitable throughout the period considered.
Industrija Unije je imela dobiček v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
In view of the above, it can be concluded that the Union industry did not suffer material injury over the period considered.
Glede na navedeno je mogoče skleniti, da industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju ni utrpela materialne škode.
As explained in recitals 69, 70, 77 and 78, the exporting producers in Russia and Ukraine have the potential to substantially raise their exports volume to the Union by using available spare capacity of some 1750000 tonnes, which is equal to the entire Union consumption.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 69, 70, 77 in 78, imajo proizvajalci izvozniki v Rusiji in Ukrajini možnost znatno povečati svoj obseg izvoza v Unijo tako, da uporabijo razpoložljive proste zmogljivosti v višini okoli 1750000 ton, kar je enako celotni potrošnji Unije.
The total capacity of the exporting producers in Russia and Ukraine amounts to 5500000 tonnes.
Celotna zmogljivost proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji in Ukrajini znaša 5500000 ton.
It is therefore likely that substantial quantities of Russian and Ukrainian SPT will penetrate the Union market to regain lost market share due to the anti-dumping duties in force and increase it further should measures be repealed.
Zaradi tega je verjetno, da bi ob razveljavitvi ukrepov na trg Unije prodrle znatne količine ruskih in ukrajinskih brezšivnih cevi, da si povrnejo izgubljeni tržni delež zaradi veljavnih protidampinških dajatev in ga še povečajo.
As highlighted in recital 95 prices of imports from Russia and Ukraine were found to be low and to undercut EU prices.
Kot je poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi 95, so bile cene uvoza iz Rusije in Ukrajine nizke in so nelojalno nižale prodajne cene EU.
Indeed in the case of Ukraine, as indicated in recital 80 prices may even drop further.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 80, lahko v primeru Ukrajine cene še dodatno padejo.
Such price behaviour, coupled with the ability of the exporters in those countries to deliver significant quantities of the product concerned to the Union market, would in all likelihood have a downward effect on prices in the Union market, with an expected negative impact on the economic situation of the Union industry.
Tako gibanje cen, skupaj z zmožnostjo izvoznikov v teh državah, da na trg Unije dobavijo znatne količine zadevnega izdelka, bi imelo po vsej verjetnosti negativen učinek na cene na trgu Unije, s pričakovanim negativnim vplivom na gospodarski položaj industrije Unije.
As shown above, the financial performance of the Union industry is closely linked to the price level on the Union market.
Kot je navedeno, je finančna uspešnost industrije Unije tesno povezana z ravnijo cen na trgu Unije.
It is therefore likely that if the Union industry was exposed to increased volumes of imports from Russia and Ukraine at dumped prices it would result in a deterioration of its financial situation as found in the latest investigation.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno v zadnji preiskavi, obstaja verjetnost, da bi izpostavljenost industrije Unije večjemu obsegu uvoza iz Rusije in Ukrajine po dampinških cenah povzročila poslabšanje njenega finančnega stanja.
On this basis, it is concluded that the repeal of the measures against imports originating in Russia and Ukraine would in all likelihood result in the recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Na podlagi tega se sklene, da bi bila posledica razveljavitve ukrepov za uvoz s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine po vsej verjetnosti ponovitev škode industriji Unije.
It is important to recall that antidumping measures were imposed in 2006 to counteract the injurious dumping caused by imports from, inter alia, Croatia, Russia and Ukraine.
Opozoriti je treba, da so bili leta 2006 uvedeni protidampinški ukrepi, da bi ublažili učinke škodljivega dampinga zaradi uvoza med drugim iz Hrvaške, Rusije in Ukrajine.
However, the Union industry could not benefit fully from these measures since the market shares of these countries have been substituted by low priced Chinese imports.
Vendar industrija Unije ni mogla v celoti izkoristiti teh ukrepov, ker so tržne deleže teh držav nadomestile nizke cene kitajskega uvoza.
As far as Croatia is concerned and as indicated in recital 60, the sole plant is for sale, production has ceased completely and is not likely to resume shortly.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 60, je edini obrat na Hrvaškem naprodaj, proizvodnja se je v celoti ustavila in se verjetno ne bo v kratkem nadaljevala.
In addition, given the negligible volumes exported to the Union, even if production is to be resumed shortly, it is very unlikely that the volume that can be exported to the Union will reach the volumes exported in the past.
Glede na zanemarljiv obseg izvoza v Unijo bi poleg tega tudi v primeru nadaljevanja proizvodnje v kratkem še vedno bilo zelo malo verjetno, da bi obseg izvoza v Unijo dosegel enako raven kot v preteklosti.
Therefore, in view of the negligible exports in the period considered and the fact that production has ceased completely after the RIP, it is concluded that the repeal of the measures on imports originating in Croatia would in all likelihood not result in the recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Glede na zanemarljiv izvoz v obravnavanem obdobju in dejstvo, da se je po OPP proizvodnja popolnoma ustavila, se sklene, da razveljavitev ukrepov za uvoz s poreklom iz Hrvaške najverjetneje ne bi povzročila ponovitve škode industriji Unije.
In compliance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether maintenance of the existing anti-dumping measures against Russia and Ukraine would be against the interest of the Union as a whole.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali bi bila ohranitev obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov proti Rusiji in Ukrajini v nasprotju z interesom Unije kot celote.
On this basis, it was examined whether, despite the conclusions on the likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Union interest to maintain measures against imports originating in Russia and Ukraine in this particular case.
Na podlagi tega je bilo proučeno, ali so kljub sklepom o verjetnosti ponovitve škodljivega dampinga obstajali utemeljeni razlogi za sklep, da ohranitev ukrepov proti uvozu s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine v tem konkretnem primeru ni v interesu Unije.
The Union industry has proven to be a structurally viable industry.
Industrija Unije je dokazala, da je strukturno sposobna preživeti.
This was confirmed by the positive development of its economic situation observed during the period considered.
To je potrdil pozitiven razvoj njenega gospodarskega položaja v obravnavanem obdobju.
In particular, the fact that the Union industry increased its market share over the period considered is a strong indicator that the Union industry managed to adapt to the changed market circumstances.
Dober pokazatelj, da se je industriji Unije uspelo prilagoditi spremenjenim tržnim razmeram, je zlasti dejstvo, da je industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečala svoj tržni delež.
Also, the Union industry remained profitable throughout the period considered.
Industrija Unije je tudi imela dobiček v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
It can reasonably be expected that the Union industry will continue to benefit if the measures are maintained.
Upravičeno se lahko pričakuje, da bo industrija Unije še naprej uživala koristi, če se ukrepi ohranijo.
The imposition of measures will enable the Union industry to increase its sales volume and profit level to allow continued investment in its production facilities.
Uvedba ukrepov bo industriji Unije omogočila povečanje obsega prodaje in stopnjo dobička, s čimer bo lahko še naprej vlagala v svoje proizvodne obrate.
Should the measures against imports originating in Russia and Ukraine not be maintained, it is likely that the Union industry will again suffer injury from increased imports at dumped prices from these countries and that its financial situation will deteriorate.
V primeru, da se ukrepi proti uvozu s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine ne bi ohranili, je verjetno, da bo industrija Unije ponovno utrpela škodo zaradi povečanega uvoza po dampinških cenah iz teh držav in da se bo njen finančni položaj poslabšal.
It is recalled that in the previous investigations it was found that the impact of the imposition of measures would not be significant to importers.
Treba je opozoriti, de je bilo v prejšnjih preiskavah ugotovljeno, da vpliv uvedbe ukrepov za uvoznike ne bo znaten.
As indicated in recital 18, three importers replied to the questionnaire and cooperated fully in this investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 18, so izpolnjene vprašalnike predložili trije uvozniki, ki so tudi v celoti sodelovali v tej preiskavi.
They indicated that measures were pushing prices up.
Navedli so, da ukrepi zvišujejo cene.
However, as the investigation showed that the cooperating importers source SPT from various suppliers from many different countries and that prices were at competitive levels, the possible impact of a continuation of measures on imports from Russia and Ukraine will be limited.
Vendar kot je pokazala preiskava, se sodelujoči uvozniki oskrbujejo z brezšivnimi cevmi od različnih dobaviteljev iz več različnih držav, cene pa so konkurenčne, zato bo morebiten vpliv nadaljevanja ukrepov za uvoz iz Rusije in Ukrajine omejen.
In view of the above, it was concluded that the current measures in force had no substantial negative effect on the importers’ financial situation and that the continuation of the measures would not unduly affect them.
Na podlagi navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da trenutno veljavni ukrepi ne vplivajo bistveno na finančni položaj uvoznikov in da nadaljevanje ukrepov ne bi pretirano vplivalo na njih.
On the basis of the information available it would appear that the share of SPT in the costs of production of users is quite low.
Glede na razpoložljive informacije se zdi, da je delež brezšivnih cevi pri proizvodnih stroških uporabnikov precej nizek.
SPT are, in general, part of larger projects (boilers, pipelines, construction) of which they form only a limited part.
Brezšivne cevi so na splošno del večjih projektov (toplotne cevi, plinovodi, zgradbe), pri katerih tvorijo le omejen del.
The possible impact of a continuation of measures may, therefore, not be significant.
Morebiten učinek nadaljevanja ukrepov zato morda ne bo znaten.
As mentioned in recital 18, only one user cooperated in this investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 18, je v tej preiskavi sodeloval samo en uporabnik.
It indicated that it did not suffer from the existence of the measures as other sources were available and that SPT did not represent a significant share of its cost of production.
Navedel je, da ni utrpel škode zaradi obstoja ukrepov, saj so bili na voljo drugi viri, in da brezšivne cevi niso predstavljale znatnega deleža njegovih stroškov proizvodnje.
In this context, it was concluded that given the negligible incidence of the cost of SPT on the user industries and the existence of other available sources of supply, the measures in force do not have a significant effect on the user industry.
S tem v zvezi je bilo sklenjeno, da glede na zanemarljiv pomen stroškov brezšivnih cevi za uporabniške industrije in obstoj drugih razpoložljivih virov dobave veljavni ukrepi nimajo znatnega učinka na uporabniško industrijo.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to recommend that the existing measures be maintained on imports of the product concerned originating in Russia and Ukraine and be terminated with regard to imports originating in Croatia.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bil predviden predlog za ohranitev obstoječih ukrepov za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine in za ukinitev ukrepov glede uvoza s poreklom iz Hrvaške.
One Russian exporter requested and was granted a hearing with the Hearing Officer.
En ruski izvoznik je zahteval zaslišanje pri pooblaščencu za zaslišanje, ki mu je bilo odobreno.
That exporter argued that the Commission incorrectly concluded that it did not cooperate in the investigation.
Ta izvoznik je trdil, da je Komisija zmotno sklepala, da ni sodeloval v preiskavi.
This exporter had come forward as an interested party and provided the Commission with two submissions, mainly related to injury, which were duly taken into consideration by the Commission.
Ta izvoznik se je Komisiji javil kot zainteresirana stran in ji je predložil dve stališči, predvsem v zvezi s škodo, ki ju je Komisija ustrezno upoštevala.
However, that exporter did not reply to the AD questionnaire and did not provide any information regarding its export price.
Vendar ta izvoznik ni izpolnil vprašalnika o dampingu in ni predložil informacij o svoji izvozni ceni.
Therefore the Commission had no option but to calculate the normal value with regard to Russia based on best facts available.
Zato Komisija ni imela druge možnosti, kot da izračuna normalno vrednost glede na Rusijo na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
The use of this methodology was not questioned by that exporter.
Uporabi te metodologije ta izvoznik ni ugovarjal.
Under these circumstances this exporter cannot be considered to have fully cooperated in the investigation.
V teh okoliščinah ne more veljati, da je ta izvoznik popolnoma sodeloval v preiskavi.
The same exporter also claimed that the disclosure was vague, contradictory and insufficiently motivated.
Isti izvoznik je trdil tudi, da je bilo razkritje nejasno, protislovno in nezadostno obrazloženo.
Another Russian exporter argued that imports from Russia should be de-cumulated for those of Ukraine.
Drug ruski izvoznik je trdil, da uvoza iz Rusije ne bi smeli seštevati z uvozom iz Ukrajine.
However, in the latest investigation, imports from Russia and Ukraine were assessed cumulatively (together with imports from Croatia).
Vendar je bil v zadnji preiskavi uvoz iz Rusije in Ukrajine ocenjen kumulativno (skupaj z uvozom iz Hrvaške).
As the conditions of Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation are still met with regard to imports from Russia and Ukraine, the effects of such imports were cumulatively assessed as set out in recitals 88 to 92.
Ker so pogoji iz člena 3(4) osnovne uredbe v zvezi z uvozom iz Rusije in Ukrajine kljub temu izpolnjeni, so bili učinki takega uvoza ocenjeni kumulativno, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 88 do 92.
No arguments were brought forward that would justify a change in methodology in this respect.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni argumenti, ki bi v zvezi s tem utemeljili spremembo metodologije.
Several interested parties argued that the situation of the Union industry does not warrant maintenance of the measures as the recurrence of injury is unlikely.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da položaj industrije Unije ne upravičuje ohranitve ukrepov, saj ponovitev škode ni verjetna.
However, no new arguments were brought forward that would lead to a different conclusion regarding the recurrence of injury as set out in recitals 123 to 127 above.
Vendar niso bili predloženi nobeni novi argumenti, ki bi privedli do drugačnega sklepa v zvezi s ponovitvijo škode, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 123 do 127.
It was also argued by several interested parties that the long duration of the measures is unjustified and calls for their expiry.
Več zainteresiranih strani je tudi trdilo, da je dolgo trajanje ukrepov neupravičeno in da se morajo izteči.
In this respect it has to be recalled that this is the first expiry review regarding the current product scope.
V zvezi s tem je treba opomniti, da je to prvi pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v zvezi s trenutnim obsegom izdelka.
Measures regarding this product scope are only in force since 2006, which cannot be considered as an unjustifiably long duration.
Ukrepi v zvezi s tem obsegom izdelka so veljavni šele od leta 2006, kar ne more veljati za neupravičeno dolgo trajanje.
Indeed measures were in force between 1997 and 2004 regarding imports from Russia and between 2000 and 2004 regarding imports from Croatia and Ukraine, but these measures concerned a much smaller product scope.
Ukrepi so bili sicer res v veljavi med letoma 1997 in 2004 za uvoz iz Rusije in med letoma 2000 in 2004 za uvoz iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine, vendar so ti ukrepi zajemali bistveno manjši obseg izdelka.
In any event, as it has been found in this investigation that the conditions in Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation have been met for the continuation of the measures, the fact that measures may have been in place for a number of years is irrelevant.
Vendar kot je bilo ugotovljeno v tej preiskavi, so bili pogoji iz člena 11(2) osnovne uredbe za nadaljevanje ukrepov izpolnjeni, zato dejstvo, da so bili ukrepi v veljavi več let, ni relevantno.
Finally it was stated that imports from Russia are treated differently than imports from Belarus and Croatia, which can be considered discriminatory.
Nazadnje je bilo rečeno, da se je uvoz iz Rusije obravnaval drugače kot uvoz iz Belorusije in Hrvaške, kar lahko šteje za diskriminacijo.
This statement does not reflect reality as the situation with regard to these countries is completely different.
Ta trditev ne ustreza realnosti, saj je položaj teh držav popolnoma drugačen.
The complaint regarding imports from Belarus was withdrawn and the proceeding was subsequently terminated in accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation [20].
Pritožba v zvezi z uvozom iz Belorusije je bila umaknjena, postopek pa je bil pozneje ustavljen v skladu s členom 9(1) osnovne uredbe [20].
Following disclosure, no indications were provided showing that such termination would not be in the Union interest.
Po razkritju niso bili predloženi nobeni podatki, ki bi kazali, da taka ustavitev ne bi bila v interesu Unije.
With regard to Croatia, as set out in recitals 63 to 65, production in Croatia ceased.
Kar zadeva Hrvaško, je v uvodnih izjavah 63 do 65 navedeno, da se je proizvodnja v tej državi ustavila.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the comments received were not of such nature as to change the above conclusions.
Na podlagi tega je mogoče zaključiti, da niso bile predložene nobene pripombe, zaradi katerih bi se spremenili zgornji sklepi.
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of SPT, originating in Russia and Ukraine should be maintained.
Iz navedenega sledi, da je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe treba ohraniti protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz brezšivnih cevi s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine.
Conversely, the measures applicable to imports from Croatia should be allowed to lapse,
Nasprotno se ukrepi za uvoz iz Hrvaške morajo izteči –