natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to further innovation and competition, the identification of a particular technical specification should not disqualify a competing technical specification from being identified in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.
Da bi spodbudili inovacije in konkurenco, opredelitev določene tehnične specifikacije ne bi smela onemogočiti opredelitve tehnične specifikacije v skladu z določbami te uredbe.
Any identification should be subject to the criteria being fulfilled and to the technical specification having achieved a significant level of market acceptance.
Vsaka opredelitev bi morala temeljiti na izpolnjevanju meril, pri čemer bi morala tehnična specifikacija doseči pomembno raven tržne razširjenosti.
The identified ICT technical specifications could contribute to the implementation of Decision No 922/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on interoperability solutions for European public administrations (ISA) [26] which establishes, for the period 2010-2015, a programme on interoperability solutions for European public administrations and institutions and bodies of the Union, providing common and shared solutions facilitating interoperability.
Opredeljene tehnične specifikacije IKT bi lahko prispevale k izvajanju Sklepa št. 922/2009/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o interoperabilnostnih rešitvah za evropske javne uprave (ISA) [26], ki za obdobje 2010–2015 določa program o interoperabilnostnih rešitvah za evropske javne uprave ter institucije in organe Unije in zagotavlja enotne in skupne rešitve za pospeševanje interoperabilnosti.
Situations may arise in the field of ICT where it is appropriate to encourage the use of, or require compliance, with relevant standards at Union level in order to ensure interoperability in the single market and to improve freedom of choice for users.
Na področju IKT lahko pride do položaja, ko je primerno spodbujati uporabo ustreznih standardov na ravni Unije ali zahtevati skladnost z njimi, da se zagotovi interoperabilnost na enotnem trgu in izboljša možnost izbire za uporabnike.
In other circumstances, it may also happen that specified European standards no longer meet consumers’ needs or are hampering technological development.
V drugih okoliščinah se lahko zgodi tudi, da določeni evropski standardi ne izpolnjujejo več potreb potrošnikov ali da ovirajo tehnološki razvoj.
For these reasons, Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services [27] enables the Commission, where necessary, to request European standardisation organisations to draw up standards, to establish and publish in the Official Journal of the European Union a list of standards or specifications with the view to encourage their use, or to make their implementation compulsory, or to remove standards or specifications from that list.
Zato Direktiva 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve [27] Komisiji omogoča, da po potrebi od evropskih organizacij za standardizacijo zahteva pripravo, uvedbo in objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije seznama standardov ali specifikacij z namenom spodbujanja njihove uporabe ali da se predpiše obvezno izvajanje teh standardov ali da se ti standardi oziroma specifikacije odstranijo s seznama.
This Regulation should not prevent European standardisation organisations from continuing to develop standards in the field of ICT and to increase their cooperation with other standard developing bodies, especially in the field of ICT, in order to ensure coherence and avoid fragmentation or duplication during implementation of standards and specifications.
Ta uredba evropskim organizacijam za standardizacijo ne bi smela preprečiti nadaljnjega razvoja standardov na področju IKT ter krepitve sodelovanja z drugimi organi, ki razvijajo standarde, zlasti na področju IKT, da se zagotovi skladnost in prepreči razdrobljenost ali podvajanje med izvajanjem standardov in specifikacij.
The procedure for identification of ICT technical specifications provided for in this Regulation should not undermine the coherence of the European standardisation system.
Postopek za opredelitev tehničnih specifikacij IKT iz te uredbe ne bi smel ogroziti skladnosti evropskega standardizacijskega sistema.
Therefore, this Regulation should also lay down the conditions under which it can be considered that a technical specification does not conflict with other European standards.
Zato bi morala ta uredba določiti tudi pogoje, pod katerimi se tehnična specifikacija obravnava kot specifikacija, ki ni v nasprotju z drugimi evropskimi standardi.
Before identifying ICT technical specifications which may be eligible for referencing in public procurement, the Multi Stakeholder Platform established by the Commission Decision of 28 November 2011 [28] should be used as a forum for consultation of European and national stakeholders, European standardisation organisations and Member States in order to ensure legitimacy of the process.
Pred opredelitvijo tehničnih specifikacij IKT, ki bi bile lahko primerne za sklicevanje v javnem naročanju, bi se lahko platforma več zainteresiranih strani, vzpostavljena s Sklepom Komisije z dne 28. novembra 2011 [28], uporabljala kot forum za posvetovanje z evropskimi in nacionalnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, evropskimi organizacijami za standardizacijo in državami članicami, da se zagotovi legitimnost procesa.
Decision No 1673/2006/EC establishes the rules concerning the contribution of the Union to the financing of European standardisation in order to ensure that European standards and other European standardisation deliverables are developed and revised in support of the objectives, legislation and policies of the Union.
Sklep št. 1673/2006/ES določa predpise o prispevku Unije pri financiranju evropske standardizacije, da se zagotovita razvoj in revizija evropskih standardov in drugih evropskih standardizacijskih dokumentov v podporo ciljem, zakonodaji in politikam Unije.
It is appropriate, for the purpose of administrative and budgetary simplification, to incorporate the provisions of that Decision into this Regulation and to use wherever possible the least burdensome procedures.
Zaradi upravne in proračunske poenostavitve je primerno, da se določbe navedenega sklepa vključijo v to uredbo in da se, kjerkoli je to mogoče, uporabi najmanj obremenjujoč postopek.
In view of the very broad field of involvement of European standardisation in support of Union legislation and policies and the different types of standardisation activity, it is necessary to provide for different financing arrangements.
Ob upoštevanju zelo širokega področja vključenosti evropske standardizacije v podporo zakonodaji in politikam Unije ter različnih vrst dejavnosti standardizacije je treba določiti različne načine financiranja.
This mainly concerns grants without calls for proposals to the European standardisation organisations and national standardisation bodies in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 110(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [29] and point (d) of Article 168(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002.
To zadeva zlasti donacije brez razpisov za zbiranje predlogov evropskim organizacijam za standardizacijo in nacionalnim organom za standardizacijo v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 110(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [29], in točko (d) člena 168(1) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002.
Furthermore, the same provisions should apply to those bodies which, whilst not recognised as European standardisation organisations in this Regulation, have been mandated in a basic act and have been entrusted with carrying out preliminary work in support of European standardisation in cooperation with the European standardisation organisations.
Nadalje, enake določbe bi se morale uporabljati tudi za tiste organe, ki v tej uredbi sicer niso opredeljeni kot evropske organizacije za standardizacijo, so pa pooblaščeni v temeljnem aktu in zadolženi za izvajanje pripravljalnih del za podporo evropski standardizaciji v sodelovanju z evropskimi organizacijami za standardizacijo.
Inasmuch as European standardisation organisations provide ongoing support for Union activities, they should have effective and efficient central secretariats.
V kolikor Evropske organizacije za standardizacijo trajno podpirajo dejavnosti Unije, bi morale imeti na voljo učinkovite in zmogljive osrednje sekretariate.
The Commission should therefore be allowed to provide grants to those organisations that are pursuing an objective of general European interest without applying, in the case of operating grants, the principle of annual reduction provided for in Article 113(2) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.
Komisiji bi zato moralo biti dovoljeno, da tem organizacijam, ki si prizadevajo za cilj v splošnem evropskem interesu, dodeli donacije, ne da bi v primeru donacij za poslovanje uporabila načelo postopnega zmanjševanja iz člena 113(2) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013) [30], Decision No 1926/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013) [31] and Regulation (EC) No 614/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) [32] already provide for the possibility of financial support of European organisations representing SMEs, consumers and environmental interests in standardisation, while specific grants are paid to European organisations representing social interests in standardisation.
Sklep št. 1639/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o ustanovitvi Okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (2007–2013) [30], Sklep št. 1926/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o uvedbi programa ukrepov Skupnosti na področju potrošniške politike (2007–2013) [31] ter Uredba (ES) št. 614/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o finančnem instrumentu za okolje (LIFE+) [32] že zagotavljajo možnost finančne podpore evropskim organizacijam, ki zastopajo MSP, potrošnike in okoljske interese v standardizaciji, posebne donacije pa se plačujejo evropskim organizacijam, ki zastopajo družbene interese v standardizaciji.
Such organisations pursue an aim of general European interest and constitute, by virtue of the specific mandate that national non-profit organisations have given them, a European network representing non-profit organisations active in the Member States and promoting principles and policies consistent with the objectives of the Treaties.
Take organizacije si prizadevajo za cilj, ki je v splošnem evropskem interesu, in na podlagi posebnega pooblastila nacionalnih nepridobitnih organizacij sestavljajo evropsko mrežo nepridobitnih organizacij, ki delujejo v državah članicah ter spodbujajo načela in politike, skladne s cilji Pogodb.
Because of the context in which they operate and their statutory objectives, European organisations representing SMEs, consumers and environmental and social interests in European standardisation have a permanent role which is essential for Union objectives and policies.
Evropske organizacije, ki v evropski standardizaciji zastopajo MSP, potrošnike ter okoljske in družbene interese, imajo zaradi okoliščin, v katerih delujejo, in svojih statutarno določenih ciljev trajno vlogo, ki je bistvena za cilje in politike Unije.
Therefore, the Commission should be in a position to continue providing grants to those organisations without applying, in the case of operating grants, the principle of annual reduction provided for in Article 113(2) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.
Komisija bi zato morala imeti možnost, da tem organizacijam še naprej dodeljuje donacije, ne da bi v primeru donacij za poslovanje uporabila načelo postopnega zmanjševanja iz člena 113(2) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002.
The financing of standardisation activities should also be capable of covering preliminary or ancillary activities in connection with the establishment of European standards or European standardisation deliverables for products and for services.
Financiranje dejavnosti standardizacije bi moralo omogočati tudi kritje pripravljalnih ali dodatnih dejavnosti, povezanih z nastajanjem evropskih standardov ali evropskih standardizacijskih dokumentov za proizvode in za storitve.
This is necessary primarily for work involving research, the preparation of preliminary documents for legislation, inter-laboratory tests and the validation or evaluation of standards.
To je potrebno predvsem za raziskovalno delo, pripravo pripravljalnih dokumentov za zakonodajo, izvajanje medlaboratorijskih preskusov, potrjevanje veljavnosti ali vrednotenje standardov.
The promotion of standardisation at European and international level should also continue through programmes relating to the technical assistance to, and cooperation with, third countries.
Pospeševanje standardizacije na evropski in mednarodni ravni bi se moralo nadaljevati tudi s programi v zvezi s tehnično pomočjo tretjim državam in sodelovanjem z njimi.
With a view to improving market access and boosting the competitiveness of enterprises in the Union, it should be possible to give grants to other bodies through calls for proposals or, where necessary, by awarding contracts.
Za izboljšanje dostopa do trgov in povečanje konkurenčnosti podjetij v Uniji bi moralo biti mogoče dodeliti donacije drugim organom z razpisi za zbiranje predlogov ali po potrebi z oddajo javnih naročil.
Union financing should seek to establish European standards or European standardisation deliverables for products and for services, to facilitate their use by enterprises through the enhanced support for their translation into the various official Union languages, in order to allow SMEs to fully benefit from the understanding and application of the European standards, to strengthen the cohesion of the European standardisation system and to ensure fair and transparent access to European standards for all market players throughout the Union.
Namen financiranja Unije bi moral biti oblikovanje evropskih standardov ali evropskih standardizacijskih dokumentov za proizvode in za storitve, omogočanje njihove uporabe podjetjem preko okrepljene podpore za njihovo prevajanje v različne uradne jezike Unije, z namenom omogočiti MSP, da v celoti izkoristijo razumevanje in uporabo evropskih standardov, krepitev kohezije sistema evropske standardizacije ter zagotovitev pravičnega in preglednega dostopa do evropskih standardov za vse akterje na trgu po vsej Uniji.
This is especially important in cases where the use of standards enables compliance with relevant Union legislation.
To je še zlasti pomembno v primerih, ko uporaba standardov omogoča skladnost z zadevno zakonodajo Unije.
In order to ensure the effective application of this Regulation, there should be the possibility of using the requisite expertise, particularly with regard to auditing and financial management, as well as administrative support resources capable of facilitating implementation, and of evaluating on a regular basis the relevance of the activities receiving Union financing in order to ensure their usefulness and impact.
Za zagotovitev učinkovite uporabe te uredbe bi morala obstajati možnost uporabe potrebnega strokovnega znanja, zlasti na področju revizije in finančnega upravljanja, in tudi sredstev za administrativno podporo, ki bi lahko olajšala njeno izvajanje, ter možnost rednega vrednotenja primernosti dejavnosti, ki jih financira Unija, da se zagotovi njihova koristnost in učinek.
Appropriate measures should also be taken to avoid fraud and irregularities and to recover funds unduly paid in accordance with Council Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests [33] and (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities’ financial interests against fraud and other irregularities [34] and Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) [35].
Prav tako bi bilo treba sprejeti primerne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij in nepravilnosti ter za izterjavo sredstev, ki so bila neupravičeno izplačana, v skladu z uredbama Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 z dne 18. decembra 1995 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti [33] in (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96 z dne 11. novembra 1996 o pregledih in inšpekcijah na kraju samem, ki jih opravlja Komisija za zaščito finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi nepravilnostmi [34], ter Uredbo (ES) št. 1073/1999 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. maja 1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) [35].
In order to update the list of European standardisation organisations and to adapt the criteria for organisations representing SMEs and societal stakeholders to further developments as regards their non-profit making nature and representativity, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the Annexes to this Regulation.
Da se posodobi seznam evropskih organizacij za standardizacijo in prilagodi merila za organizacije, ki zastopajo MSP in družbene zainteresirane strani, nadaljnjemu razvoju, kar zadeva njihovo nepridobitnost in reprezentativnost bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi s spremembami prilog k tej uredbi.
The committee set up by this Regulation should assist the Commission in all matters related to the implementation of this Regulation, having due regard for the views of sectoral experts.
Odbor, ustanovljen s to uredbo, bi moral pomagati Komisiji pri vseh zadevah, ki so povezane z izvajanjem te uredbe, in pri tem primerno upoštevati mnenja strokovnjakov za posamezne sektorje.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers [36].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije [36].
The advisory procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts with respect to the objections to harmonised standards and where the references to the harmonised standard concerned have not yet been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, given that the relevant standard has not yet led to the presumption of conformity with the essential requirements set out in the applicable Union harmonisation legislation.
Za sprejetje izvedbenih aktov v zvezi z nasprotovanjem harmoniziranim standardom in kadar sklicevanje na harmonizirani standard še ni bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, bi se moral uporabljati svetovalni postopek, če zadevni standard še ni ustvaril domneve o skladnosti z bistvenimi zahtevami iz ustrezne usklajevalne zakonodaje Unije.
The examination procedure should be used for each standardisation request submitted to European standardisation organisations and the adoption of implementing acts with respect to the objections to harmonised standards and where the references to the harmonised standard concerned have already been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, given that such decision could have consequences on the presumption of conformity with the applicable essential requirements.
Za vsako zahtevo po standardizaciji, predloženo evropskim organizacijam za standardizacijo, in za sprejetje izvedbenih aktov v zvezi z nasprotovanjem harmoniziranim standardom, kadar je bilo sklicevanje na harmonizirani standard že objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, bi se moral uporabljati postopek pregleda, saj bi taka odločitev lahko imela posledice na domnevo o skladnosti z ustreznimi bistvenimi zahtevami.
In order to achieve the main objectives of this Regulation and to facilitate speedy decision-making procedures as well as reducing the overall development time for standards, use should be made as far as possible of the procedural measures provided for in Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, which enables the chair of the relevant committee to lay down a time limit within which the committee should deliver its opinion, according to the urgency of the matter.
Za dosego glavnih ciljev te uredbe in za omogočanje postopka hitrejšega sprejemanja odločitev ter zmanjšanje skupnega časa za razvoj standardov bi se morali v največji možni meri uporabiti postopkovni ukrepi, določeni v Uredbi (EU) št. 182/2011, kar predsedniku ustreznega odbora omogoča, da v skladu z nujnostjo zadeve določi časovni rok, do katerega bi moral odbor posredovati svoje mnenje.
Moreover, where justified, it should be possible for the opinion of the committee to be obtained by written procedure, and silence on the part of the committee member should be regarded as tacit agreement.
Poleg tega bi moralo biti v upravičenih primerih možno, da se mnenje odbora sprejme na podlagi pisnega postopka, pri čemer bi se moral molk člana odbora obravnavati kot tiho soglasje.
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of standards and standardisation as policy tools for the Union through cooperation between European standardisation organisations, national standardisation bodies, Member States and the Commission, the establishment of European standards and European standardisation deliverables for products and for services in support of Union legislation and policies, the identification of ICT technical specifications eligible for referencing, the financing of European standardisation and stakeholder participation in European standardisation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can, therefore, by reason of their effect, be better achieved at the Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU.
Ker ciljev te uredbe, in sicer zagotavljanje uspešnosti in učinkovitosti standardov in standardizacije kot orodja politike Unije na podlagi sodelovanja med evropskimi organizacijami za standardizacijo, nacionalnimi organi za standardizacijo, državami članicami in Komisijo, nastajanje evropskih standardov in evropskih standardizacijskih dokumentov za proizvode in storitve v podporo zakonodaji in politikam Unije, opredelitev tehničnih specifikacij IKT, na katere se je mogoče sklicevati, financiranje evropske standardizacije in sodelovanja zainteresiranih strani pri evropski standardizaciji, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in jih je zaradi njihovega učinka lažje doseči na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego teh ciljev.