natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
invites for the second time to investigate, in a full study, Parliament’s obligations under Rule 103 of its Rules of Procedure with regard to Free Software and Open Standards;
že drugič poziva, naj se v celostni študiji preučijo obveznosti Parlamenta iz člena 103 Poslovnika glede brezplačne programske opreme in odprtih standardov;
regrets that Free Software and Open Source solutions are not more widely used in the Parliament’s IT infrastructure;
obžaluje, da rešitve, povezane z brezplačno programsko opremo in odprtimi standardi, niso bolj razširjene v infrastrukturi informacijske tehnologije Parlamenta;
Notes the Secretary-General’s reply indicating that Parliament allowances covered 1599 accredited assistants’ contracts and 2868 local assistants’ contracts in 2011;
je seznanjen z odgovorom generalnega sekretariata, v katerem ta navaja, da je bilo leta 2011 po pogodbah do nadomestil Parlamenta upravičenih 1599 akreditiranih pomočnikov in 2868 lokalnih pomočnikov;
Management of Parliament’s administration
Vodenje uprave Parlamenta
Points to the excellent quality of Parliament’s Interpretation and Translation services;
poudarja odlično kakovost tolmaških in prevajalskih služb Parlamenta;
notes that they continue to constitute a considerable part of Parliament’s budget;
ugotavlja, da še vedno predstavljajo pomemben del proračuna Parlamenta;
notes that the decision on the ‘Resource efficient full multilingualism in interpretation’ taken by the Bureau in 2011 increases the efficiency of interpretation services and reduces their structural costs;
ugotavlja, da sklep o z viri gospodarni popolni večjezičnosti pri tolmačenju, ki ga je predsedstvo sprejelo leta 2011, izboljšuje učinkovitost tolmaških služb in zmanjšuje njihove strukturne stroške;
calls on Parliament to bring forward a detailed document on the structure of translation and interpretation costs and measures to decrease further these costs and improve the efficiency of the services, without compromising overall quality;
poziva Parlament, naj pripravi podroben dokument o strukturi stroškov prevajanja in tolmačenja ter o ukrepih za dodatno zmanjšanje stroškov in izboljšanje učinkovitosti teh služb, ne da bi ogrozili splošno kakovost;
Notes that 192 members of staff report to the Directors-General without going through a Director;
ugotavlja, da 192 uslužbencev poroča neposredno generalnemu direktorju, in ne najprej direktorju;
asks the Secretary-General to review this situation to ensure that ‘cabinets’ for Directors-General are not being created unofficially;
poziva generalnega sekretarja, naj to vprašanje preuči in zagotovi, da se ne bi ustanavljali neuradni „kabineti“ generalnih direktorjev;
asks the Secretary-General to include in the review an assessment of the grades, powers and responsibilities of those members of staff;
poziva ga še, naj v pregled vključi tudi oceno plačilnih razredov, pooblastil in odgovornosti teh uslužbencev;
Activity reports by the Directors-General
Poročila generalnih direktorjev o dejavnostih
Notes that Directors-General report annually on the performance of their duties in activity reports that constitute an internal management tool the primary purpose of which is to give the Secretary-General a clear overview of the workings of the administration, and in particular of any weaknesses;
ugotavlja, da generalni direktorji vsako leto poročajo o opravljanju svojih nalog v poročilih o dejavnostih, ki so instrument za notranje upravljanje, katerega glavni namen je zagotoviti generalnemu sekretarju jasen pregled nad dejavnostmi uprave, predvsem pa nad morebitnimi pomanjkljivostmi;
observes that, for the annual activity reports in respect of the financial year 2011, no authorising officer has included reservations in their declarations concerning the identification, by Directors-General, of significant problems in the way resources have been used or the failure of control procedures to ensure the legality and regularity of transactions;
opaža, da za letna poročila o dejavnostih v proračunskem letu 2011 noben odredbodajalec v svojo izjavo ni vključil pridržkov v zvezi z opredelitvijo pomembnih težav pri porabi sredstev s strani generalnih direktorjev ali v zvezi z neuspešnostjo postopkov kontrol pri zagotavljanju zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij;
Points out that each directorate-general’s activity report includes, as an annex, a list of exceptions, itemising derogations from applicable regulations and standard procedures;
poudarja, da je poročilom o dejavnostih vseh generalnih direktoratov priložen seznam izjem, na katerem so po postavkah navedena odstopanja od veljavnih pravil in standardnih postopkov;
expresses concern that, for some directorates, the number of such exceptions remains elevated and suggests that further effort should be made to avoid recourse to this expedient in order to correct anomalous situations;
izraža zaskrbljenost, da število takih izjem v nekaterih direktoratih ostaja visoko, in predlaga, da se okrepijo prizadevanja za preprečevanje uporabe takega sredstva za odpravo nenormalnih stanj;
DG Presidency
Generalni direktorat predsedstva
Welcomes DG Presidency’s commitment to continuing improvements in financial management through the in-depth examination of the various aspects of budget implementation and associated procedures;
pozdravlja zavezo generalnega direktorata predsedstva, da bo še izboljšal finančno poslovodenje s poglobljeno preučitvijo različnih vidikov proračunskega izvrševanja in povezanih postopkov;
notices in particular the efforts undertaken in the field of cultivating staff awareness of procurement procedures and budgetary operations;
zlasti opaža prizadevanja na področju ozaveščanja uslužbencev o postopkih javnega naročanja in proračunskih operacijah;
Reiterates that the area of security is a very sensitive sector in any parliament, but even more so in a multinational one, with high visibility and constant visits from Heads of State and government;
ponovno poudarja, da je področje varnosti zelo občutljivo v vseh parlamentih, a še bolj v večnacionalnem parlamentu z veliko prepoznavnostjo in nenehnimi obiski voditeljev držav in vlad;
notes that the average daily presence in the Parliament’s premises in Brussels is 12000;
ugotavlja, da je v prostorih Parlamenta v Bruslju vsak dan navzočih povprečno 12 tisoč ljudi;
Takes note of the Bureau’s adoption, by unanimity, of the ‘New global security concept’ on 6 July 2011 which includes the idea of reserving the various entrances to Parliament for different categories of users;
je seznanjen, da je predsedstvo 6. julija 2011 soglasno sprejelo nov koncept splošne varnosti, ki temelji na zamisli omejevanja različnih vhodov v prostore Parlamenta za različne kategorije uporabnikov;
requests to be informed of the implementation of the ‘New global security concept’ by the end of 2013;
zahteva, da se ga obvešča o uvajanju tega koncepta do konca leta 2013;
Notes that Parliament expects that the internalisation of security services will reduce costs in Brussels and Strasbourg by EUR 11250000 in the period 2013 to 2016 and by EUR 5640000 for each year thereafter;
ugotavlja, da naj bi po pričakovanju Parlamenta internalizacija varnostnih storitev zmanjšala stroške v Bruslju in Strasbourgu za 11250000 EUR v obdobju 2013–2016 in za 5640000 EUR vsako naslednje leto;
seeks assurances that the highest standards will be established and maintained for targeted security through a continuous training programme;
zahteva zagotovilo, da se bodo s stalnim programom usposabljanja postavili in ohranjali najvišji standardi želene varnosti;
demands a yearly report with detailed information on the development of the costs of the security service, including the accrued costs for pensions of staff employed in these services, and the measures taken to ensure the scope and quality of the service;
zahteva letno poročilo s podrobnimi informacijami o gibanju stroškov varnostne službe, vključno z nastalimi stroški pokojnin za osebje, zaposleno na tem področju, ter sprejetimi ukrepi za zagotavljanje obsega in kakovosti te službe;
Reiterates its wish that Members will be subject to electronic control when entering or leaving the Parliament’s premises to increase security;
ponavlja svojo željo, da bi za poslance veljal elektronski nadzor pri vhodu v stavbe Parlamenta ali ob njihovem izhodu, da bi izboljšali varnost;
Requests to receive information from the Secretariat-General on the procedure to be followed on the evaluation of the joint transparency register, which is due to take place in 2013, according to the inter-institutional agreement reached in 2011;
od generalnega sekretarja želi informacije o postopku, po katerem je treba oceniti skupni register za preglednost, ki naj bi začel delovati leta 2013, v skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom iz leta 2011;
Notes that more than 1500 staff have their children enrolled in the European Schools, and is therefore surprised to learn that Parliament does not play any role in the Governance of the European School system;
ugotavlja, da ima več kot 1500 zaposlenih svoje otroke vpisane v evropske šole, zato je presenečen, da Parlament nima nobene besede pri vodenju sistema evropskih šol;
Calls on the Secretary-General to investigate which role Parliament could play in the governance of the European School system, given the high number of staff who rely on them for educating their children, and report back to the competent committee before the end of the year;
poziva generalnega sekretarja, naj razišče, kakšno vlogo bi lahko imel Parlament pri vodenju sistema evropskih šol glede na veliko število zaposlenih, ki so tem šolam zaupali izobraževanje svojih otrok, ter še pred koncem leta o tem poroča pristojnemu odboru;
Directorate-General for Finance (DG Finance)
Generalni direktorat za finance
Travel Agency
Turistična agencija
Takes note of the fact that the contract with the current travel agency expires on 31 December 2013 and that the preparations of a new call for tenders have started;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da pogodba s sedanjo turistično agencijo poteče 31. decembra 2013 in da so se začele priprave na nov javni razpis;
regrets that, while the possibility of a financial audit was provided for in the contract, this is not the case for an audit of the structure and performance of the travel agency;
obžaluje, da je bila v pogodbi določena možnost finančne revizije, ne pa revizija strukture in uspešnosti turistične agencije;
insists that a future contract should include the possibility of intermediary and final financial and performance audits;
vztraja, naj prihodnja pogodba vključuje možnost posrednika ter končne finančne revizije in revizije uspešnosti;
as requested by the Committee on Budgetary Control, welcomes the fact that the administration will also have recourse to external expertise when establishing tender documentation and throughout the selection procedure, thereby ensuring that Parliament chooses the best solution, resulting in major simplifications and cost-savings;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se bo lahko uprava na zahtevo Odbora za proračunski nadzor pri pripravi razpisne dokumentacije in skozi celoten postopek izbire posvetovala tudi z zunanjimi strokovnjaki, tako da bo Parlament izbral najboljšo rešitev, kar bo prineslo bistvene poenostavitve in prihranke pri stroških;
stresses that the new contract should take into account the best quality/price ratio and the best value for money with competitive prices;
poudarja, da bi morala nova pogodba upoštevati najboljše razmerje med kakovostjo in ceno ter najugodnejšo ponudbo s konkurenčnimi cenami;
DG Communication
Generalni direktorat za komuniciranje
Parliaments’ Communication Policy
Komunikacijska politika Parlamenta
Welcomes the finalisation by the Bureau on 23 March 2011 of an Action Plan for the period 2011-2014 which aims at implementing the Parliament’s updated Communication Strategy;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je 23. marca 2011 predsedstvo zaključilo akcijski načrt za obdobje 2011–2014, ki je namenjen izvajanju posodobljene komunikacijske strategije Parlamenta;
notes that the Action Plan focuses on the 2014 parliamentary elections and that it defines a set of 21 specific activities in order to raise the citizens’ awareness of and encourage their participation in Parliament’s legislative work;
ugotavlja, da je akcijski načrt osredotočen na parlamentarne volitve leta 2014 in da določa 21 posebnih dejavnosti za izboljšanje ozaveščenosti državljanov o zakonodajnem delu Parlamenta ter za spodbujanje njihove udeležbe v njem;
Welcomes the fact that the new visitors’ centre has been a success judged in terms of the number of visitors (253000) it received in its first year of activity;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil novi center za obiskovalce uspešen z vidika števila obiskovalcev (253000) v prvem letu delovanja,
Insists that the communication budget must be used only to provide citizens with factual information on Union policies;
vztraja, da je treba proračun za komunikacije uporabiti zgolj za to, da bi državljanom posredovali stvarne informacije o politikah Unije;
stresses that this also applies to social media activities;
poudarja, da to velja tudi za dejavnosti družabnih medijev;
Regrets that the audience of Europarl TV, although greater in 2011 as compared with 2010 [14], continues to be very low in the case of direct individual users (excluding viewers through partnership agreements with regional TVs) despite the considerable financing that it still received in 2011, amounting to some EUR 8000000 (item 3 2 4 6);
obžaluje, da je število neposrednih individualnih gledalcev Europarl TV, čeprav je bilo leta 2011 večje v primerjavi z letom 2010 [14], še vedno zelo majhno (pri tem niso upoštevani gledalci prek partnerskih sporazumov z regionalnimi televizijami), in to kljub znatnim sredstvom, ki jih je televizija prejela leta 2011, tj. približno 8000000 EUR (postavka 3 2 4 6);
regrets further that no cost-benefit evaluation of Europarl TV has been made, despite the fact that this was requested by plenary in its resolution on discharge 2010;
prav tako obžaluje, da ni bila opravljena ocena stroškov in koristi Europarl TV, čeprav jo je Parlament na plenarnem zasedanju zahteval v resoluciji o razrešnici za leto 2010;
notes the decision of the Bureau of 12 December 2012 to implement a set of reforms in order to achieve significant savings;
je seznanjen s sklepom predsedstva z dne 12. decembra 2012 o izvedbi sklopa reform za dosego znatnih prihrankov;
expects that such a cost- benefit evaluation is presented before the 2012 discharge procedure;
pričakuje, da bo ta ocena stroškov in koristi predložena pred postopkom razrešnice za leto 2012;
Expresses concern over the increased cost of the Lux Prize in 2011 [15];
je zaskrbljen zaradi povečanja stroškov nagrade Lux v letu 2011 [15];
calls for a more cost-efficient management of this prize and therefore suggests the Internal Auditor might consider reviewing its administration to achieve this goal;
poziva k stroškovno učinkovitejšemu upravljanju te nagrade in zato predlaga, naj notranji revizor razmisli o reviziji tega upravljanja, da bi uresničili cilj;
strongly suggests that a clear maximum ceiling should be set for the costs of the event;
izrecno predlaga, naj se za stroške dogodka določi jasna zgornja meja;
Notes that a business plan for the House of European History in Brussels was approved by the Bureau on 26 September 2011 and that the Commission has declared its willingness to make an unspecified contribution to the running costs of the project and will communicate to Parliament before the end of the summer 2013 the terms of such contribution;
ugotavlja, da je predsedstvo 26. septembra 2011 odobrilo poslovni načrt za Hišo evropske zgodovine v Bruslju in da je Komisija izrazila pripravljenost za pomoč pri kritju tekočih stroškov projekta; ugotavlja še, da še ni opredelila, kolikšen bo znesek pomoči, in da bo Parlamentu pred koncem poletja 2013 sporočila pogoje za ta prispevek;
regrets that no contribution is expected from the Commission towards the set-up costs of the project;
obžaluje, da od Komisije ni mogoče pričakovati prispevka za začetne stroške projekta;
Welcomes the new procedure enabling the recovery of overpayments following payments for hosting visitor groups;
izraža zadovoljstvo z novim postopkom, ki omogoča povračilo preplačanih zneskov po plačilu za sprejem skupin obiskovalcev;
considers it a pity that the option of payment by bank transfer should be available only for transfers to personal accounts, with no provision for transfers to the accounts of organisations;
obžaluje, da je možnost plačila z bančnim nakazilom omejena na eno nakazilo na osebni račun in ne omogoča nakazila na račun organizacij;
is concerned about the significant security risk entailed in making cash payments to visitor groups, the sums in question being as much as EUR 30000 plus, with Parliament distributing up to EUR 388000 in a day;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi precejšnjega varnostnega tveganja pri plačilih v gotovini skupinam obiskovalcev, saj gre za zneske, ki lahko presegajo 30000 EUR in ki jih Parlament lahko izplača do zneska 388000 EUR na dan;
points out that Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing [16] requires particular care to be taken with transactions involving sums of more than EUR 15000, an amount that is regular exceeded in Parliament’s payments to visitors;
poudarja, da Direktiva Sveta 2005/60/ES z dne 26. oktobra 2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma [16] zahteva posebno pozornost pri transakcijah, ki presegajo znesek 15000 EUR, kar se pri izplačilih Parlamenta skupinam obiskovalcev redno dogaja;
Directorate-General for Internal Policies (DG IPOL)
Generalni direktorat za notranjo politiko
Points out that a new Directorate for Impact Assessment has been set up within DG IPOL in July 2011 by decision of the Bureau;
poudarja, da je bil julija 2011 s sklepom predsedstva v generalnem direktoratu za notranjo politiko vzpostavljen nov direktorat za oceno učinka;
notes that the Directorate’s main objective is to provide the Parliament with independent impact assessments in order to support its legislative work;
ugotavlja, da so glavni cilji direktorata Parlamentu zagotoviti neodvisne ocene učinka, da bi podprli njegovo zakonodajno delo; pozdravlja, da je bila vzpostavitev direktorata proračunsko nevtralna;
welcomes that the Directorate’s creation has been budgetary neutral;
Generalni direktorat za inovacije in tehnološko podporo
Calls for an overall analysis by an independent body of the sound financial management, effectiveness and efficiency of contracts with external service providers in the IT area with particular regard to:
zahteva, naj neodvisni organ izvede splošno analizo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti pogodb z zunanjimi ponudniki storitev na področju informacijske tehnologije, pri čemer se mora osredotočiti zlasti na:
needs assessment,
oceno potreb,
the method of selection,
metodo izbire,
the most suitable type of contract,
najprimernejši tip pogodbe,
the possible loss of management control through excessive externalisation, and
možno izgubo nadzora nad upravljanjem zaradi prevelike eksternalizacije ter
transparency of fee/billing mechanisms;
preglednost plačilnih mehanizmov;
Regrets the overdependence on external (technical) expertise, especially in IT sectors, resulting from structural imbalances between internal and external resources;
obžaluje preveliko odvisnost od zunanjih (tehničnih) strokovnjakov, zlasti v sektorjih informacijske tehnologije, zaradi strukturnih neravnovesij med notranjimi in zunanjimi viri;
points out that externalisation of IT activities should always ensure that the management and control of that function remains within Parliament and that threats to the security and confidentiality of data are properly assessed and mitigated;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba pri eksternalizaciji dejavnosti informacijske tehnologije vedno poskrbeti, da upravljanje te funkcije in nadzor nad njo ohrani Parlament, ter ustrezno ocenjevati in odpravljati grožnje za varnost in zaupnost podatkov;
Directorate-General for Infrastructure and Logistics (DG INLO)
Generalni direktorat za infrastrukturo in logistiko
Calls on the Secretary-General to present a plan to the Bureau to address and improve the catering service due to the increased numbers of customers in Parliament’s canteens, restaurants and bars (overall activities increased by around 150 % from 2002 to 2011, from 1,472 million customers in 2002 compared to 3,711 million customers in 2011);
poziva generalnega sekretarja, naj predsedstvu predloži načrt za obvladovanje in izboljšanje službe za pripravo in dostavo hrane zaradi vse večjega števila strank v menzah, restavracijah in barih Parlamenta (skupni promet se je od leta 2002 do 2011 povečal za skoraj 150 %, in sicer z 1,472 milijona strank leta 2002 na 3,711 milijona strank leta 2011);
Parliaments’ Buildings policy
Nepremičninska politika Parlamenta
Notes the following decisions taken by Bureau in 2011, in the context of the medium-term buildings strategy adopted in 2010, to carry out a number of important projects with a view to bringing the buildings into use from the start of the next parliamentary term:
je seznanjen z naslednjimi sklepi, ki jih je leta 2011 sprejelo predsedstvo v okviru srednjeročne nepremičninske strategije za leto 2010, in sicer o izvedbi več pomembnih projektov za zagotovitev začetka uporabe stavb z naslednjim parlamentarnim mandatom:
in Brussels:
v Bruslju:
the purchase of the Trebel Building and the signing of a long-term rental contract with an option to purchase in respect of Montoyer 70,
nakup stavbe Trebel in podpis dolgoročne najemne pogodbe z možnostjo nakupa za stavbo Montoyer 70,
in Strasbourg:
v Strasbourgu:
the purchase of the Vaclav Havel Building so that it can house the Ombudsman and his staff, freeing up office space for Members in the central buildings,
nakup stavbe Vaclav Havel, da bi tam namestili službe varuha in tako sprostili prostore za poslance v osrednjih stavbah,
in Luxembourg:
v Luxembourgu:
continuing renovation and extension of the Konrad Adenauer Building in accordance with the terms of the Bureau decision of 12 January 2012, with enhanced partnership arrangements involving the Luxembourg Government,
nadaljevanje obnove in razširitve stavbe Konrad Adenauer (KAD) v skladu s sklepom predsedstva z dne 12. januarja 2012 z okrepljenim partnerstvom luksemburške države,
in Sofia:
v Sofiji:
the preliminary agreement for purchase of the new building for the Europe House, Sofia, for EUR 9 million, was signed on 7 July 2011,
7. julija 2011 je bil podpisan predhodni sporazum o nakupu nove stavbe za Evropsko hišo v Sofiji za 9 milijonov EUR,
the implementation of an enhanced maintenance policy in Brussels and Strasbourg so as to guarantee maximum safety and optimum use of facilities,
izvajanje politike boljšega vzdrževanja v Bruslju in Strasbourgu, da se zagotovi čim večja varnost in optimalna uporaba infrastruktur,
the launching of a systematic renovation policy, based on a set timetable, given the age of Parliament’s oldest buildings;
začetek načrtovane in sistematične politike obnove, ob upoštevanju starosti najstarejših stavb Parlamenta;
observes that the new methodology has already been implemented by the Buildings Committee to examine the applications and bids received for the property market survey in Brussels, i.e. the replacement of the Eastman and Montoyer 63 buildings and the search for new premises;
opaža, da je odbor za stavbe že uporabil novo metodologijo pri preučitvi vlog in ponudb, ki jih je prejel za raziskave na nepremičninskem trgu v Bruslju, in sicer za nadomestitev stavb Eastman in Montoyer 63 ter za iskanje novih prostorov;
Points out that any property and buildings strategy must also take account of the rising costs of maintaining the buildings purchased;
poudarja, da mora vsaka strategija za nepremičnine in stavbe upoštevati tudi rastoče stroške vzdrževanja kupljenih stavb;