natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Goods subject to illegal parallel trade, namely goods that have been manufactured with the consent of the right-holder but placed on the market for the first time in the European Economic Area without his consent, and overruns, namely goods that are manufactured by a person duly authorised by a right-holder to manufacture a certain quantity of goods, in excess of the quantities agreed between that person and the right-holder, are manufactured as genuine goods and it is therefore not appropriate that customs authorities focus their efforts on such goods.
Blago, ki je predmet nedovoljene vzporedne trgovine, torej blago, ki je sicer proizvedeno s soglasjem imetnika pravice, vendar je bilo na trg v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru prvič dano brez njegovega soglasja, in „prekoračitev“, torej, da je oseba, ki jo je imetnik pravice ustrezno pooblastil za proizvodnjo določene količine blaga, blago proizvedla v večjih količinah, kot je bilo dogovorjeno z imetnikom pravice, je proizvedeno kot pristno blago, zato ni primerno, da carinski organi svoja prizadevanja usmerijo v takšno blago.
Illegal parallel trade and overruns should therefore also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Nedovoljena vzporedna trgovina in „prekoračitve“ bi zato morale biti prav tako izvzete iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
Member States should, in cooperation with the Commission, provide appropriate training for customs officials, in order to ensure the correct implementation of this Regulation.
Države članice bi morale v sodelovanju s Komisijo zagotoviti primerno usposabljanje za carinske uradnike, da se zagotovi pravilno izvajanje te uredbe.
This Regulation, when fully implemented, will further contribute to an internal market which ensures right-holders a more effective protection, fuels creativity and innovation and provides consumers with reliable and high-quality products, which should in turn strengthen cross-border transactions between consumers, businesses and traders.
Ko se bo ta uredba v celoti izvajala, bo dodatno prispevala k notranjemu trgu, ki imetnikom pravic zagotavlja učinkovitejšo zaščito, krepi ustvarjalnost in inovativnost ter potrošnikom nudi zanesljive in kakovostne izdelke, kar bi moralo posledično okrepiti čezmejne transakcije med potrošniki, podjetji in trgovci.
Member States face increasingly limited resources in the field of customs.
Države članice se na carinskem področju soočajo z vse bolj omejenimi viri.
Therefore, the promotion of risk management technologies and strategies to maximise resources available to customs authorities should be supported.
Zato bi bilo treba podpreti spodbujanje tehnologij za upravljanje tveganja in strategij za čim boljše koriščenje virov, ki so na voljo carinskim organom.
This Regulation solely contains procedural rules for customs authorities.
Ta uredba vsebuje zgolj postopkovna pravila za carinske organe.
Accordingly, this Regulation does not set out any criteria for ascertaining the existence of an infringement of an intellectual property right.
Ta uredba zato ne določa nikakršnih meril za ugotavljanje obstoja kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine.
Under the ‘Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health’ adopted by the Doha WTO Ministerial Conference on 14 November 2001, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) can and should be interpreted and implemented in a manner supportive of WTO Members’ right to protect public health and, in particular, to promote access to medicines for all.
V skladu z „Izjavo o Sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju“, sprejeto na ministrski konferenci STO 14. novembra 2001 v Dohi, se Sporazum o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum TRIPS) lahko in bi ga bilo treba razlagati in izvajati tako, da podpira pravico članic STO do varovanja javnega zdravja in zlasti spodbujanja dostopa do zdravil za vse.
Consequently, in line with the Union’s international commitments and its development cooperation policy, with regard to medicines, the passage of which across the customs territory of the Union, with or without transhipment, warehousing, breaking bulk, or changes in the mode or means of transport, is only a portion of a complete journey beginning and terminating beyond the territory of the Union, customs authorities should, when assessing a risk of infringement of intellectual property rights, take account of any substantial likelihood of diversion of such medicines onto the market of the Union.
Zato bi morali carinski organi glede zdravil, katerih prehod čez carinsko območje Unije – s pretovarjanjem, skladiščenjem, delitvijo tovora ali spremembami načina ali sredstva prevoza ali brez njih – je le del celotne poti, ki se začne in konča zunaj ozemlja Unije, v skladu z mednarodnimi obvezami Unije in njeno politiko razvojnega sodelovanja pri ocenjevanju tveganja kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine upoštevati vsako precejšnjo verjetnost preusmeritve takih zdravil na trg Unije.
This Regulation should not affect the provisions on the competence of courts, in particular, those of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [3].
Ta uredba ne bi smela vplivati na določbe o pristojnosti sodišč, zlasti ne na tiste iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2012 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [3].
Persons, users, bodies or groups of producers, who are in a position to initiate legal proceedings in their own name with respect to a possible infringement of an intellectual property right, should be entitled to submit an application.
Osebe, uporabniki, organi ali skupine proizvajalcev, ki lahko v svojem imenu sprožijo pravni postopek v zvezi z morebitno kršitvijo pravice intelektualne lastnine, bi morale biti upravičene vložiti zahtevo.
In order to ensure that intellectual property rights are enforced throughout the Union, it is appropriate to allow persons or entities seeking enforcement of Union-wide rights to apply to the customs authorities of a single Member State.
Da se zagotovi, da so pravice intelektualne lastnine uveljavljene v celotni Uniji, je primerno, da se osebam ali subjektom, ki si prizadevajo za uveljavitev pravic na ravni Unije, dovoli, da svojo zahtevo vložijo pri carinskih organih ene države članice.
Such applicants should be able to request that those authorities decide that action be taken to enforce the intellectual property right both in their own Member State and in any other Member State.
Takim prosilcem bi moralo biti omogočeno, da od teh organov zahtevajo, da se za uveljavitev pravice intelektualne lastnine določi ukrepanje tako v njihovi državi članici kot v kateri koli drugi državi članici.
In order to ensure the swift enforcement of intellectual property rights, it should be provided that, where the customs authorities suspect, on the basis of reasonable indications, that goods under their supervision infringe intellectual property rights, they may suspend the release of or detain the goods whether at their own initiative or upon application, in order to enable a person or entity entitled to submit an application to initiate proceedings for determining whether an intellectual property right has been infringed.
Za zagotovitev hitre uveljavitve pravic intelektualne lastnine bi bilo treba določiti, da lahko carinski organi, če na podlagi utemeljenih indicev sumijo, da blago pod njihovim nadzorom krši pravice intelektualne lastnine, bodisi na svojo pobudo bodisi na podlagi zahteve prekinejo prepustitev blaga ali ga zadržijo in tako osebi ali subjektu, upravičenemu do vložitve zahteve, omogočijo sprožitev postopka za ugotovitev, ali je bila kršena pravica intelektualne lastnine.
Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 allowed Member States to provide for a procedure allowing the destruction of certain goods without there being any obligation to initiate proceedings to establish whether an intellectual property right has been infringed.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1383/2003 je bilo državam članicam omogočeno, da določijo postopek, na podlagi katerega se lahko določeno blago uniči, ne da bi bilo treba sprožiti postopek za ugotovitev, ali je bila kršena pravica intelektualne lastnine.
As recognised in the European Parliament Resolution of 18 December 2008 on the impact of counterfeiting on international trade [4], such procedure has proved very successful in the Member States where it has been available.
Kot je bilo priznano v Resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. decembra 2008 o vplivu ponarejanja na mednarodno trgovino [4], se je tak postopek v državah članicah, v katerih je bil na voljo, izkazal za zelo uspešnega.
Therefore, the procedure should be made compulsory with regard to all infringements of intellectual property rights and should be applied, where the declarant or the holder of the goods agrees to destruction.
Zato bi moral biti ta postopek obvezen za vse kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine in bi ga bilo treba uporabiti, kadar deklarant ali imetnik blaga soglaša z uničenjem.
Furthermore, the procedure should provide that customs authorities may deem that the declarant or the holder of the goods has agreed to the destruction of the goods where he has not explicitly opposed destruction within the prescribed period.
Poleg tega bi moral ta postopek določati, da lahko carinski organi štejejo, da je deklarant ali imetnik blaga soglašal z uničenjem blaga, če v predpisanem roku ni izrecno nasprotoval uničenju.
In order to reduce the administrative burden and costs to a minimum, a specific procedure should be introduced for small consignments of counterfeit and pirated goods, which should allow for such goods to be destroyed without the explicit agreement of the applicant in each case.
Za čim večje zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve in stroškov bi bilo treba za manjše pošiljke ponarejenega in piratskega blaga uvesti poseben postopek, s katerim bi bilo takšno blago mogoče uničiti brez izrecnega soglasja vložnika v vsakem primeru.
However, a general request made by the applicant in the application should be required in order for that procedure to be applied.
Vendar bi moral vložnik v svoji zahtevi na splošno zahtevati, da se uporabi ta postopek.
Furthermore, customs authorities should have the possibility to require that the applicant covers the costs incurred by the application of that procedure.
Nadalje bi morali imeti carinski organi možnost zahtevati, da vložnik krije stroške, nastale z izvedbo tega postopka.
For further legal certainty, it is appropriate to modify the timelines for suspending the release of or detaining goods suspected of infringing an intellectual property right and the conditions in which information about detained goods is to be passed on to persons and entities concerned by customs authorities, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003.
Zaradi večje pravne varnosti je primerno spremeniti roke za prekinitev prepustitve ali zadržanja blaga, pri katerem obstaja sum kršitve pravice intelektualne lastnine, in pogoje, pod katerimi morajo carinski organi posredovati informacije o zadržanem blagu zadevnim osebam in subjektom, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 1383/2003.
Taking into account the provisional and preventive character of the measures adopted by the customs authorities when applying this Regulation and the conflicting interests of the parties affected by the measures, some aspects of the procedures should be adapted to ensure the smooth application of this Regulation, whilst respecting the rights of the concerned parties.
Ob upoštevanju začasne in preventivne narave ukrepov, ki jih carinski organi sprejmejo pri uporabi te uredbe, in nasprotujočih si interesov strank, ki jih ukrepi zadevajo, bi bilo treba nekatere vidike postopkov prilagoditi, da bi zagotovili nemoteno uporabo te uredbe ob hkratnem upoštevanju pravic zadevnih strank.
Thus, with respect to the various notifications envisaged by this Regulation, the customs authorities should notify the relevant person, on the basis of the documents concerning the customs treatment or of the situation in which the goods are placed.
Kar zadeva različna uradna obvestila iz te uredbe, bi morali carinski organi na podlagi dokumentov o carinski obravnavi ali na podlagi situacije, v kateri je blago, uradno obvestiti ustrezno osebo.
Furthermore, since the procedure for destruction of goods implies that both the declarant or the holder of the goods and the holder of the decision should communicate their possible objections to destruction in parallel, it should be ensured that the holder of the decision is given the possibility to react to a potential objection to destruction by the declarant or the holder of the goods.
Ker postopek za uničenje blaga implicira, da bi morala tako deklarant ali imetnik blaga kot imetnik odločbe hkrati sporočiti svoje morebitno nasprotovanje uničenju, bi bilo treba poleg tega zagotoviti, da se imetniku odločbe omogoči, da se odzove na morebitno nasprotovanje deklaranta ali imetnika blaga uničenju.
It should therefore be ensured that the declarant or the holder of the goods is notified of the suspension of the release of the goods or their detention before, or on the same day as, the holder of the decision.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da se deklaranta ali imetnika blaga uradno obvesti o prekinitvi prepustitve blaga ali njegovem zadržanju pred ali na isti dan kot imetnika odločbe.
Customs authorities and the Commission are encouraged to cooperate with the European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights in the framework of their respective competences.
Carinske organe in Komisijo se spodbuja, da v okviru svojih pristojnosti sodelujejo z Evropskim opazovalnim uradom za kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine.
With a view to eliminating international trade in goods infringing intellectual property rights, the TRIPS Agreement provides that WTO Members are to promote the exchange of information between customs authorities on such trade.
Za odpravo mednarodne trgovine z blagom, ki krši pravice intelektualne lastnine, je v Sporazumu TRIPS določeno, da morajo članice STO spodbujati izmenjavo informacij o takšni trgovini med carinskimi organi.
Accordingly, it should be possible for the Commission and the customs authorities of the Member States to share information on suspected breaches of intellectual property rights with the relevant authorities of third countries, including on goods which are in transit through the territory of the Union and originate in or are destined for those third countries.
Skladno s tem bi moralo biti mogoče, da Komisija in carinski organi držav članic izmenjujejo informacije o domnevnih kršitvah pravic intelektualne lastnine z zadevnimi organi tretjih držav, tudi glede blaga, ki je v tranzitu prek ozemlja Unije in izvira iz ali je namenjeno tem tretjimi državam.
In the interest of efficiency, the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 of 13 March 1997 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs or agricultural matters [5], should apply.
Zaradi učinkovitosti bi bilo treba uporabljati določbe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 515/97 z dne 13. marca 1997 o medsebojni pomoči med upravnimi organi držav članic in o sodelovanju med njimi in Komisijo zaradi zagotavljanja pravilnega izvajanja carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje [5].
The liability of the customs authorities should be governed by the legislation of the Member States, though the granting by the customs authorities of an application should not entitle the holder of the decision to compensation in the event that goods suspected of infringing an intellectual property right are not detected by the customs authorities and are released or no action is taken to detain them.
Odgovornost carinskih organov bi morala biti urejena z zakonodajo držav članic, vendar pa imetnik odločbe na podlagi ugoditve zahtevi s strani carinskih organov ne bi smel biti upravičen do nadomestila, če carinski organi ne bi odkrili blaga, pri katerem obstaja sum kršitve pravice intelektualne lastnine, in bi bilo blago sproščeno ali če ne bi bil sprejet ukrep za njegovo zadržanje.
Given that customs authorities take action upon application, it is appropriate to provide that the holder of the decision should reimburse all the costs incurred by the customs authorities in taking action to enforce his intellectual property rights.
Ker carinski organi ukrepajo na podlagi zahteve, je primerno določiti, da bi moral imetnik odločbe povrniti vse stroške, ki so carinskim organom nastali pri ukrepanju za uveljavitev njegovih pravic intelektualne lastnine.
Nevertheless, this should not preclude the holder of the decision from seeking compensation from the infringer or other persons that might be considered liable under the legislation of the Member State where the goods were found.
Kljub temu pa to imetniku odločbe ne bi smelo preprečiti, da bi zahteval nadomestilo od kršitelja ali drugih oseb, ki bi se utegnile šteti za odgovorne v skladu z zakonodajo države članice, v kateri je bilo blago najdeno.
Such persons might include intermediaries, where applicable.
Take osebe bi, kjer je to primerno, utegnile vključevati posrednike.
Costs and damages incurred by persons other than customs authorities as a result of a customs action, where the release of goods is suspended or the goods are detained on the basis of a claim of a third party based on intellectual property, should be governed by the specific legislation applicable in each particular case.
Stroški in škoda, nastali osebam, ki niso carinski organi, zaradi carinskega ukrepanja, če je prepustitev blaga prekinjena ali njegovo zadržanje temelji na zahtevku tretje strani na podlagi intelektualne lastnine, bi morali biti urejeni s specifično zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za vsak posamezen primer.
This Regulation introduces the possibility for customs authorities to allow goods which are to be destroyed to be moved, under customs supervision, between different places within the customs territory of the Union.
S to uredbo se uvaja možnost, da carinski organi dovolijo, da se blago, ki bo uničeno, pod carinskim nadzorom premika med različnimi kraji na carinskem območju Unije.
Customs authorities may furthermore decide to release such goods for free circulation with a view to further recycling or disposal outside commercial channels including for awareness-raising, training and educational purposes.
Poleg tega lahko carinski organi sklenejo takšno blago prepustiti v prosti promet z namenom nadaljnjega recikliranja ali odstranitve mimo komercialnih kanalov, vključno zaradi ozaveščanja, usposabljanja in izobraževanja.
Customs enforcement of intellectual property rights entails the exchange of data on decisions relating to applications.
Uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine s strani carinskih organov bo vključevalo izmenjavo podatkov o odločbah v zvezi z zahtevami.
Such processing of data covers also personal data and should be carried out in accordance with Union law, as set out in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [6] and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [7].
Taka obdelava podatkov vključuje tudi osebne podatke in bi se morala izvajati v skladu s pravom Unije, kot je določeno v Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [6] ter Uredbi (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [7].
The exchange of information relating to decisions on applications and to customs actions should be made via a central electronic database.
Izmenjava informacij v zvezi z odločbami o zahtevah in carinskih ukrepih bi morala potekati preko osrednje elektronske zbirke podatkov.
The entity which will control and manage that database and the entities in charge of ensuring the security of the processing of the data contained in the database should be defined.
Opredeliti bi bilo treba subjekt, ki bo nadziral in upravljal to podatkovno zbirko, in subjekte, ki bodo skrbeli za zagotavljanje varnosti pri obdelavi podatkov v podatkovni zbirki.
Introducing any type of possible interoperability or exchange should first and foremost comply with the purpose limitation principle, namely that data should be used for the purpose for which the database has been established, and no further exchange or interconnection should be allowed other than for that purpose.
V primeru uvedbe kakršne koli interoperabilnosti ali izmenjave bi bilo treba v prvi vrsti spoštovati načelo omejitve namena, ki pravi, da bi bilo treba podatke uporabljati za namen, za katerega je bila podatkovna zbirka vzpostavljena, pri čemer ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno nobeno nadaljnje izmenjevanje ali medsebojno povezovanje, ki ne služi temu namenu.
In order to ensure that the definition of small consignments can be adapted if it proves to be impractical, taking into account the need to ensure the effective operation of the procedure, or where necessary to avoid any circumvention of this procedure as regards the composition of consignments, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending the non-essential elements of the definition of small consignments, namely the specific quantities set out in that definition.
Da se zagotovi prilagodljivost opredelitve pojma manjših pošiljk, če se ta izkaže za nesmiselno, upoštevajoč potrebo po zagotovitvi učinkovitega izvajanja postopka, ali, če je potrebno, prepreči izogibanje temu postopku glede sestave pošiljk, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastila, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme akte v zvezi s spreminjanjem nebistvenih elementov opredelitve pojma manjših pošiljk, namreč specifičnih količin, določenih v navedeni opredelitvi.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the provisions concerning defining the elements of the practical arrangements for the exchange of data with third countries and the provisions concerning the forms for the application and for requesting the extension of the period during which customs authorities are to take action, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission, namely to define those elements of the practical arrangements and to establish standard forms.
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev izvajanja določb o opredelitvi elementov praktičnih ureditev v zvezi z izmenjavo podatkov s tretjimi državami in določb o obrazcu, s katerim se vloži zahteva, in obrazcu, s katerim se zahteva podaljšanje obdobja, v katerem morajo carinski organi ukrepati, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila, in sicer za opredelitev navedenih elementov praktičnih ureditev in določitev standardnih obrazcev.
For establishing the standard forms, although the subject of the provisions of this Regulation to be implemented falls within the scope of the common commercial policy, given the nature and impacts of those implementing acts, the advisory procedure should be used for their adoption, because all details of what information to include in the forms follows directly from the text of this Regulation.
Čeprav predmet določb te uredbe, ki jo bo treba izvajati, spada na področje uporabe skupne trgovinske politike, bi bilo treba pri določitvi standardnih obrazcev glede na naravo in učinke navedenih izvedbenih aktov za njihovo sprejetje uporabiti svetovalni postopek, saj vse podrobnosti o tem, katere informacije se vključi v obrazce, izhajajo neposredno iz besedila te uredbe.