natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Inasmuch as these measures — cessation of the marketing of refrigeration, cooking and dishwashing products under the Vedette brand for a period of five years — will bring about a worsening of the company’s financial results, it must be examined whether they can be borne by the company.
Prepričati se je treba, da so ti ukrepi – petletna ustavitev trženja proizvodov hladilne tehnike, kuhalnih aparatov in pomivalnih strojev pod blagovno znamko Vedette –, zaradi katerih bo podjetje doseglo slabše finančne rezultate, sprejemljivi za podjetje.
According to the French authorities, Tables 6 and 7 show the company’s financial results after factoring in the implementation of the compensatory measures that the French authorities propose.
Po navedbah francoskih organov so v spodnjih preglednicah 6 in 7 navedeni finančni rezultati podjetja, pri čemer se upošteva izvajanje zgoraj opisanih dodatnih izravnalnih ukrepov, ki so jih predlagali francoski organi.
Table 6 depicts an optimistic scenario, Table 7 a pessimistic one.
V preglednici 6 je opisan optimistični scenarij, v preglednici 7 pa pesimistični.
Cessation of the marketing of refrigeration, cooking and dishwashing products under the Vedette brand
Ustavitev trženja proizvodov hladilne tehnike, kuhalnih aparatov in pomivalnih strojev pod blagovno znamko Vedette (v milijonih EUR)
Best case
Optimistični scenarij
Operating profit before non-recurrent items
Dobiček iz poslovanja pred odbitkom enkratnih stroškov
Operating profit (EBIT)
Dobiček iz poslovanja (EBIT)
Pre-tax profit
Dobiček pred obdavčitvijo
Worst case
Pesimistični scenarij
The withdrawal of several product families marketed under the Vedette brand will cause losses of turnover; the losses shown in the tables are based on the following hypotheses.
Preglednici 6 in 7 temeljita na naslednjih predpostavkah v zvezi z izgubami prometa zaradi umika več družin proizvodov, ki se tržijo pod blagovno znamko Vedette.
The withdrawal may lead to:
Tak umik ima lahko naslednje učinke:
a reduction in sales in the particular family of products of the Vedette brand the marketing of which is being suspended;
upad prodaje v družini proizvodov blagovne znamke Vedette, katere trženje se začasno ukinja;
a reduction in sales in the other families of products marketed under the Vedette brand (negative range effect on products of the Vedette brand) [57];
upad prodaje v drugih družinah proizvodov, ki se tržijo pod blagovno znamko Vedette [57] (negativni učinek celotne palete na proizvode blagovne znamke Vedette);
The optimistic scenario takes account only of the effects mentioned at (a) and (b) in paragraph 144: the loss related to the cessation of the marketing of a product is taken to be equivalent to a loss of [70–90] % of the turnover from the ceased product line (the remaining [10–30] % being recovered by FagorBrandt via the increase in sales of identical products sold under brands other than Vedette) and the loss of turnover from the other products marketed under the Vedette brand is taken to be [20–30] %.
Pri optimističnem scenariju se upoštevata samo učinka (a) in (b) iz uvodne izjave (144), izguba, povezana z ustavitvijo trženja proizvoda, pa bo obsegala [70–90] % prometa ukinjenega proizvodnega programa (preostalih [10–30] % podjetje FagorBrandt doseže s povečanjem prodaje enakih proizvodov, ki se ne prodajajo pod blagovno znamko Vedette, ampak pod drugimi blagovnimi znamkami), in [20–30] % prometa drugih proizvodov, ki se tržijo pod blagovno znamko Vedette.
The pessimistic scenario takes account of the factor mentioned at (c) in paragraph 144: it presupposes a loss rate of [110–130] % for the ceased product line (as well as the loss of 100 % of turnover in the product line that has been dropped, there may be losses on other products and brands too), and a loss rate of [20–40] % for the other products sold under the Vedette brand.
Pri pesimističnem scenariju se upošteva učinek iz točke (c) uvodne izjave (144) ob domnevni [110–130]-odstotni stopnji izgube za ukinjeni proizvodni program (izguba prometa za ukinjeni proizvodni program je lahko 100-odstotna, poleg proizvodnega programa, ki je bil ukinjen, pa lahko prizadene tudi druge proizvode in blagovne znamke) in [20–40]-odstotni stopnji izgube za druge proizvode, ki se tržijo pod blagovno znamko Vedette.
The French authorities explain that such a pessimistic hypothesis corresponds to the company’s actual experience: it decided in 2003 to abandon the marketing of microwave ovens under the Vedette brand in France in order to concentrate on the Brandt brand, which had its own specific sales force.
Francoski organi pojasnjujejo, da je taka pesimistična predpostavka v skladu s preteklo izkušnjo podjetja: leta 2003 se je odločilo, da v Franciji opusti trženje mikrovalovnih pečic pod blagovno znamko Vedette, da bi se v celoti usmerilo na blagovno znamko Brandt, katere prodaja je bila še posebej intenzivna.
This had a highly negative knock-on effect, as not only was the entire turnover achieved under the Vedette brand lost, but the loss also affected the Brandt brand (total loss on these two brands of […] appliances over two years compared with initial sales of […] units, including […] under the Vedette brand, being equivalent to a loss of [120–140] % of the abandoned volumes [58].
Ta ukinitev je imela zelo negativen učinek, saj se je izgubil ne samo celoten ustvarjeni promet blagovne znamke Vedette, ampak je izguba dosegla tudi blagovno znamko Brandt (skupna izguba iz teh dveh blagovnih znamk […] aparatov v dveh letih, ki jo je treba navezati na prvotno prodajo […] enot, med njimi […] pod blagovno znamko Vedette, kar je [120–140]-odstotna izguba opuščenega obsega) [58].
On the basis of the analysis of the data in the two tables above and of the other data provided by the French authorities, the Commission would observe that the compensatory measures adopted will weaken the company, as they will lead to a worsening of its profits starting in 2009, the year of their implementation.
Komisija na podlagi proučitve podatkov iz obeh zgornjih preglednic in drugih podatkov, ki so jih predložili francoski organi, ugotavlja, da bodo izbrani izravnalni ukrepi oslabili podjetje, ker bo od leta 2009, ko se bodo navedeni ukrepi začeli izvajati, zaradi njih dosegalo slabše rezultate.
The Commission considers therefore that, despite weakening the company, the compensatory measures will not prevent a restoration of viability.
Zato Komisija meni, da izravnalni ukrepi, ki jih predlagajo francoski organi, ne bodo ovirali ponovne vzpostavitve sposobnosti preživetja podjetja, čeprav ga bodo oslabili.
This conclusion is not called into question by the Commission’s imposition of an additional compensatory measure, namely a three-year extension of the ban on marketing products under the Vedette brand.
Te ugotovitve ne izpodbija uvedba dodatnega izravnalnega ukrepa s strani Komisije, tj. potrebe po podaljšanju ustavitve trženja zadevnih proizvodov blagovne znamke Vedette za tri leta.
The impact of the additional compensatory measure on the company’s final profits is shown in Table 3: it will be seen that profits remain positive over the years 2014 to 2016, growing by an estimated [1,5–3] % a year.
Kot je namreč razvidno iz preglednice 3, ki prikazuje vpliv dodatnega izravnalnega ukrepa na končni rezultat podjetja, bo ta ostal pozitiven v letih 2014–2016 in bo dosegel rast, ocenjeno na [1,5–3] %.
The conclusion with regard to the compensatory measure imposed by the Commission is therefore the same: it will weaken the company, but it will not prevent it from returning to viability.
Zato enaka ugotovitev velja tudi za izravnalni ukrep, ki ga je sprejela Komisija: ukrep ne bo oviral ponovne vzpostavitve sposobnosti preživetja podjetja, čeprav ga bo oslabil.
In order for aid to be authorised, the amount and intensity of the aid must, pursuant to points 43 to 45 of the restructuring aid guidelines, be limited to the strict minimum necessary to enable restructuring to be undertaken in the light of the existing financial resources of the company, its shareholders or the business group to which it belongs.
Da se pomoč lahko odobri, morata biti znesek in intenzivnost pomoči v skladu s točkami od 43 do 45 smernic o pomoči za prestrukturiranje strogo omejena na najmanjša potrebna za prestrukturiranje, ob upoštevanju dejanskih finančnih virov podjetja, njegovih delničarjev ali skupine, v katero spada.
As indicated in paragraph 43 of the opening decision, the restructuring costs, as described in the French authorities’ notification, come to EUR 62,5 million. The company expects to contribute EUR 31,5 million, and to receive aid amounting to EUR 31 million.
Kot je navedeno v točki 43 sklepa o začetku postopka, stroški prestrukturiranja, opisani v priglasitvi francoskih organov, znašajo 62,5 milijona EUR. Podjetje bo prispevalo sredstva v višini 31,5 milijona in prejelo pomoč v višini 31 milijonov.
In paragraph 44 of the opening decision, the Commission raised two points regarding these data.
Komisija v točki 44 sklepa o začetku postopka navaja dva dvoma v zvezi s temi podatki.
Firstly, it asked the French authorities to explain why they had not included the repayment of the Article 44 septies aid in the restructuring costs.
Po eni strani Komisija od francoskih organov zahteva, naj utemeljijo, zakaj niso med stroške prestrukturiranja vključili vračila pomoči na podlagi člena 44f.
Secondly, it asked for an explanation as to the nature of the recipient’s own share.
Po drugi strani zahteva pojasnilo glede narave lastnega stroška upravičenca.
The French authorities answered the second point by stating that the recipient’s own share consisted of bank loans raised by FagorBrandt on the market.
Francoski organi so v odgovor na ta drugi dvom navedli, da lastni strošek upravičenca sestavljajo bančna posojila, ki jih je podjetje FagorBrandt najelo na trgu.
The Commission considers that this amounts to ‘external financing at market conditions’ as referred to in point 43 of the restructuring aid guidelines and hence constitutes a valid contribution.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je to „zunanje financiranje po tržnih pogojih“, kot je opredeljeno v točki 43 smernic o pomoči za prestrukturiranje, torej veljaven prispevek.
In reply to the Commission’s first point, the French authorities stated that the reimbursement of incompatible aid could not, on the face of it, be classed as a restructuring cost (or as a contribution by the recipient firm within the meaning of points 43 and 44 of the restructuring aid guidelines).
Francoski organi v zvezi s prvim dvomom Komisije navajajo, da se vračilo nezdružljive pomoči ne more vnaprej šteti za strošek prestrukturiranja (niti za lastni strošek podjetja, ki prejema pomoč, v smislu točk 43 in 44 smernic o pomoči za prestrukturiranje).
It was for that reason that they had not counted the Article 44 septies aid among the restructuring costs.
Zato pomoči na podlagi člena 44f niso šteli med stroške prestrukturiranja.
However, the reimbursement — estimated at approximately EUR [25–30] million (including interest) — was, of course, included in the business plan attached to the notification just like any other normal financial expenditure.
Kljub temu navajajo, da je to vračilo, ocenjeno na približno [25–30] milijonov EUR (z obrestmi), kot kateri koli drug običajen finančni izdatek seveda vključeno v poslovni načrt, priložen priglasitvi.
The Commission considers it essential that the reimbursement be allowed for in the business plan, as is the case here [60].
Komisija meni, da je treba vračilo nujno upoštevati v poslovnem načrtu, kar se je v tem primeru zgodilo [60].
But the fact remains that on 21 October 2008 the Italian aid that had been received by Brandt Italia amounted to EUR 3190878,02, to which interest must be added.
Vendar je treba tudi upoštevati, da je 21. oktobra 2008 podjetje Brandt Italia prejelo italijansko pomoč v znesku 3190878,02 EUR, pri čemer je treba temu znesku prišteti še obresti.
It cannot be ruled out, therefore, that the contribution envisaged by the firm may incorporate the sum in question.
Zato ni mogoče izključiti možnosti, da bi bil v lastni prispevek, ki ga je načrtovalo podjetje, vštet ta znesek.
The recipient’s own contribution would then fall below the 50 % threshold required by point 44 of the restructuring aid guidelines.
Posledično lastni prispevek upravičenca pade pod prag 50 %, ki se zahteva v skladu s točko 44 smernic o pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
In order to be sure that the recipient’s own contribution is indeed free of aid and amounts to at least 50 % of the cost of restructuring, the Commission will make it a condition of this positive decision that the company’s own contribution be increased by the amount of the Italian aid, namely EUR 3190878,02, to which must be added interest running to 21 October 2008.
Za zagotovitev, da v lastni prispevek podjetja ni všteta nobena pomoč in da obsega najmanj 50 % stroškov prestrukturiranja, Komisija ta sklep sprejme pod pogojem, da se lastni prispevek poveča sorazmerno z višino italijanske pomoči, ki znaša 3190878,02 EUR, pri čemer je treba temu znesku prišteti še obresti do 21. oktobra 2008.
Turning to the assertion made by the competitor requesting anonymity that the aid is not limited to the minimum, the Commission confirms that, as well as ascertaining that the formal requirement of a contribution of at least 50 % has been met, it has also examined whether the aid is limited to the strict minimum in the light in particular of the tests in point 45 of the restructuring aid guidelines.
Kar zadeva trditev konkurenta, ki je želel ostati anonimen, da pomoč ni omejena na najmanjšo potrebno, Komisija potrjuje, da je poleg preverjanja izpolnjevanja formalnega merila glede lastnega prispevka, ki mora biti večji od 50 %, tudi ocenila, ali je pomoč omejena na najmanjšo potrebno, še zlasti na podlagi meril iz točke 45 smernic o pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
The Commission considers that that is indeed the case, and that the amount of the aid does not provide the company with ‘surplus cash which could be used for aggressive, market-distorting activities not linked to the restructuring process.’
Komisija meni, da je tako in da znesek pomoči za podjetje ne pomeni „presežka denarnih sredstev, ki bi se lahko uporabil za agresivne, tržno izkrivljajoče ukrepe, ki niso povezani s postopkom prestrukturiranja“.
The Commission would observe in particular that after the aid has been granted, at the end of the restructuring period, the group will still be heavily indebted, with a debt-equity ratio still above 1.
Komisija zlasti ugotavlja, da bo skupina po dodelitvi pomoči in končanem obdobju prestrukturiranja še vedno precej zadolžena, pri čemer bo njeno razmerje med dolgom in lastnim kapitalom še vedno večje od ena.
FagorBrandt will therefore have to use the cash generated to reduce its level of indebtedness.
Zato mora FagorBrandt za zmanjšanje te stopnje zadolženosti predvsem nameniti ustvarjena likvidna sredstva.
Points 72 ff. of the restructuring aid guidelines state that restructuring aid is to be granted only once in any period of ten years.
V skladu s točko 72 in naslednjimi smernic o pomoči za prestrukturiranje je lahko pomoč za prestrukturiranje dodeljena le enkrat v obdobju desetih let.
In this case the Italian and French aid that FagorBrandt received earlier cannot be described as aid for rescue and restructuring.
V tem primeru francoske in italijanske pomoči, ki ju je dobilo podjetje FagorBrandt, ni mogoče obravnavati kot pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
When that aid was granted, in 2002 and 2003 respectively, FagorBrandt was not in difficulty, as has been shown in paragraphs 45 to 56.
V času dodelitve teh pomoči leta 2002 in 2003 podjetje FagorBrandt namreč ni bilo v težavah, kot je bilo navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (45) do (56).
The ‘one time, last time’ principle laid down in the restructuring aid guidelines has consequently been complied with.
Zato je načelo o enkratni pomoči, kot se zahteva v skladu s smernicami o pomoči za prestrukturiranje, izpolnjeno.
FagorBrandt’s restructuring plan, including all of France’s commitments, must be implemented in full [61].
Načrt prestrukturiranja podjetja FagorBrandt je treba izvesti v celoti, vključno z vsemi obveznostmi Francije [61].
The Commission asks to be kept informed of progress with the implementation of the plan and of the related commitments.
Komisija zahteva, da se jo obvešča o napredku pri izvajanju načrta in z njim povezanih obveznostih.
The aid may be declared compatible with the internal market provided all the conditions imposed are met,
Pomoč se lahko razglasi za združljivo z notranjim trgom, če se izpolnijo vsi določeni pogoji –
The aid amounting to EUR 31 million which France plans to grant to FagorBrandt is compatible with the internal market subject to the conditions laid down in Article 2.
Pomoč Francije za FagorBrandt v znesku 31 milijonov EUR je pod pogoji iz člena 2 združljiva z notranjim trgom.
The French authorities shall suspend payment to FagorBrandt of the aid referred to in Article 1 of this Decision until such time as the recovery from FagorBrandt of the incompatible aid referred to in Commission Decision 2004/343/EC of 16 December 2003 [62] has become effective.
Francoski organi morajo začasno odložiti izplačilo pomoči iz člena 1 tega sklepa podjetju FagorBrandt, dokler se od njega dejansko ne izterja nezdružljiva pomoč, na katero se nanaša Odločba Komisije št. 2004/343/ES z dne 16. decembra 2003 [62].
FagorBrandt’s restructuring plan, as communicated to the Commission by France on 6 August 2007, must be implemented in full.
Načrt prestrukturiranja za FagorBrandt, ki ga je Francija poslala Komisiji 6. avgusta 2007, se izvede v celoti.
FagorBrandt shall cease marketing refrigeration, cooking and dishwashing products of the Vedette brand for a period of eight years.
FagorBrandt ustavi trženje proizvodov hladilne tehnike, kuhalnih aparatov in pomivalnih strojev blagovne znamke Vedette za osemletno obdobje.
In order to ensure that the conditions laid down in paragraphs 1 to 4 of this Article are observed, France shall inform the Commission, by means of annual reports, of progress with the restructuring of FagorBrandt, the recovery of the incompatible aid described in paragraph 1, the payment of the compatible aid, and the implementation of the compensatory measures.
Da se zagotovi nadzor nad izvajanjem pogojev iz odstavkov od 1 do 4 tega člena, mora Francija z letnimi poročili obveščati Komisijo o napredku pri prestrukturiranju podjetja FagorBrandt, vračilu nezdružljive pomoči iz odstavka 1, plačilu združljive pomoči in izvajanju izravnalnih ukrepov.
France shall inform the Commission within two months of the date of notification of this Decision of the measures it has taken to comply with it.
Francija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, sprejetih za njegovo izvajanje.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’).
S 1. decembrom 2009 sta člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES postala člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
The substance of the two articles has not changed.
Določbe novih členov so vsebinsko enake določbam prejšnjih členov.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood where appropriate as references to Articles 87 and 88 respectively of the EC Treaty.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanje na člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije razumeti kot sklicevanje na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
The TFEU also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’, ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’ and ‘Court of First Instance’ by ‘General Court’.
S PDEU so bile uvedene tudi nekatere spremembe terminologije, besedo „Skupnost“ je na primer nadomestil izraz „Unija“, besedno zvezo „skupni trg“„notranji trg“, besedno zvezo „Sodišče prve stopnje“ pa „Splošno sodišče“.
The terminology used in this decision is that of the TFEU.
V tem sklepu se uporablja terminologija iz PDEU.
OJ L 160, 23.6.2009, p. 11.
UL L 160, 23.6.2009, str. 11.
Joined Cases T-115/09 and T-116/09, not yet published in the European Court Reports.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 14. februarja 2012, Electrolux in Whirlpool Europe proti Komisiji, (T-115/09 in T-116/09, še neobjavljeno v ZOdl).
Judgment of the General Court in Case T-301/01 Alitalia v Commission [2008] ECR II-1753.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 9. julija 2008, Alitalia proti Komisiji, (T-301/01, ZOdl. 2008, str. II-01753).
For a description of the restructuring plan see paragraphs 11 ff. of the opening decision.
Za opis načrta prestrukturiranja glej točko 11 in naslednje iz sklepa o začetku postopka.
Commission Decision 2004/343/EC of 16 December 2003 on the State aid scheme implemented by France for the takeover of firms in difficulty (OJ L 108, 16.4.2004, p. 38).
Odločba Komisije z dne 16. decembra 2003 o shemi pomoči, ki jo izvaja Francija za prevzem podjetij v težavah, UL L 108, 16.4.2004, str. 38.
Commission Decision of 1 December 2004 on the State aid which France is planning to implement for Bull, paragraphs 55 to 63 (OJ L 342, 24.12.2005, p. 81).
Odločba Komisije z dne 1. decembra 2004 o državni pomoči Francije za Bull, UL L 342, 24.12.2005, str. 81, uvodne izjave od 55 do 63.
Commission Decision of 26 April 2006 on State Aid which France is planning to implement for Euromoteurs, paragraphs 30-31 and 42 (OJ L 307, 7.11.2006, p. 213).
Odločba Komisije z dne 26. aprila 2006 o državni pomoči, ki jo Francija namerava izvajati za Euromoteurs, UL L 307, 7.11.2006, str. 213, uvodne izjave 30, 31 in 42.
Judgment in Alitalia v Commission, cited in footnote 7 above.
Zgoraj v opombi 7 navedena sodba Alitalia proti Komisiji.
Alitalia, paragraph 137.
Zgoraj navedena sodba Alitalia proti Komisiji, točka 137.
Alitalia, paragraphs 144 and 159.
Zgoraj navedena sodba Alitalia proti Komisiji, točki 144 in 159.
Alitalia, paragraphs 99 to 101 and 142.
V zvezi s tem glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Alitalia proti Komisiji, točke 99 do 101 in 142.
Alitalia, paragraph 174.
Zgoraj navedena sodba Alitalia proti Komisiji, točka 174.
Commission Decision of 26 March 1991 on aid granted by the German Government to Deggendorf GmbH (OJ L 215, 2.8.1991, p. 16).
Odločba Komisije z dne 26. marca 1991 o pomoči Nemčije za Deggendorf GmbH (UL L 215, 2.8.1991, str. 16).
That judgment upheld the judgment of the General Court in Joined Cases T-244/93 and T-486/93 TWD v Commission [1995] ECR II-2265.
Ta sodba potrjuje utemeljenost sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 13. septembra 1995 v zadevi TWD proti Komisiji, T-244/93 in T-486/93, Recueil, str. II-2265.
In this connection, the Commission Notice Towards an effective implementation of Commission decisions ordering Member States to recover unlawful and incompatible State aid (OJ C 272, 15.11.2007, p. 4) states that ‘the Commission has … started to apply Deggendorf case law in a more systematic manner. This case law enables the Commission, if certain conditions have been satisfied, to order Member States to suspend the payment of a new compatible aid to a company until that company has reimbursed old unlawful and incompatible aid that is subject to a recovery decision.’
V zvezi s tem je v Obvestilu Komisije „Za učinkovito izvajanje odločb Komisije, ki od držav članic zahtevajo dosego vračila nezakonite in nezdružljive državne pomoči“ ( UL C 272, 15.11.2007, str. 4) navedeno, da „je Komisija […] začela bolj sistematično izvajati sodno prakso iz zadeve Deggendorf. Ta sodna praksa Komisiji omogoča, da, če so izpolnjeni nekateri pogoji, od držav članic zahteva prekinitev plačila nove združljive pomoči podjetju, dokler ni to podjetje povrnilo stare nezakonite in nezdružljive pomoči, ki je predmet odločbe o vračilu“.
Judgments cited in footnote 22 above.
Navedeno v opombi 22.
That Decision was challenged by Brandt Italia and by Italy before the General Court, which dismissed the actions on 12 September 2007 (Joined Cases T-239/04 and T-323/04).
To odločbo sta podjetje Brandt Italia in Italija izpodbijali pred Sodiščem prve stopnje, ki je tožbi zavrnilo 12. septembra 2007 (združeni zadevi T-239/04 in T-323/04).