natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following the expiry review concluded in October 2011, evidence at the disposal of the Commission indicated that as far as dumping and injury are concerned, the circumstances on the basis of which the existing measures were imposed might have changed and that these changes may be of a lasting nature.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, zaključenega oktobra 2011, je bilo iz dokazov, ki jih ima Komisija na voljo, razvidno, da so se v zvezi z dampingom in škodo okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni obstoječi ukrepi, morda spremenile in da so te spremembe lahko trajne.
The prima facie evidence at the Commission’s disposal indicated that the export quota system that applied to bicycle producers in the PRC, and that hindered the exporting producers in being granted market economy treatment in the amending interim review, had been abolished in January 2011.
Dokazi prima facie, ki so Komisiji na voljo, so pokazali, da je bil sistem izvoznih kvot za proizvajalce koles v LRK, ki je oviral proizvajalce izvoznike, da bi bili v vmesnem pregledom, ki spreminja stopnjo dajatve, deležni tržnogospodarske obravnave, odpravljen januarja 2011.
Furthermore, changes to the structure of the Union industry have taken place.
Poleg tega je videti, da je prišlo do znatnih sprememb v strukturi industrije Unije.
In particular, several Union producers switched from the complete cycle of production to (partial) assembly operations using imported parts.
Predvsem je več proizvajalcev Unije iz popolnega proizvodnega ciklusa prešlo na (delno) sestavljanje z uporabo uvoženih delov.
Moreover, due to the enlargements of the European Union of 2004 and 2007, a significant number of producers joined the Union bicycle industry.
Poleg tega se je zaradi širitev Evropske unije leta 2004 in leta 2007 znatno število proizvajalcev pridružilo industriji koles Unije.
In addition, several producers which had been part of the Union industry before the two enlargement rounds moved their production facilities or set up new facilities in the new Member States.
Več proizvajalcev, ki so bili del industrije Unije pred obema širitvama, pa je preselilo svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti v nove države članice ali je tam vzpostavilo nove zmogljivosti.
As a result, the cost level of the Union industry might have changed.
Zaradi tega se je raven stroškov industrije Unije morda spremenila.
Finally, the present injury elimination level was calculated on the basis of bicycles made out of steel whereas it appears that currently the majority of bicycles are made of aluminium alloys.
Sedanja stopnja odprave škode je bila izračunana za kolesa, ki so izdelana iz jekla, medtem ko kaže, da je trenutno večina koles izdelana iz aluminijevih zlitin.
All these developments appeared to be of a lasting nature and therefore substantiated the need to reassess the injury and dumping findings.
Kazalo je, da bodo omenjene spremembe trajne, zato so upravičevale potrebo po ponovni oceni ugotovitev o škodi in dampingu.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission announced by a notice (‘Notice of initiation’) [9], published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 9 March 2012, the initiation, on an ex officio basis, of an interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of bicycles originating in the PRC.
Ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi prima facie za začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, je z obvestilom („obvestilo o začetku“) [9], objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije9. marca 2012, na podlagi uradne dolžnosti napovedala začetek vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK.
In 25 September 2012, by Regulation (EU) No 875/2012 [10], the Commission initiated an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles originating in the PRC by imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not, and making such imports subject to registration (‘the anti-circumvention investigation’).
Komisija je 25. septembra 2012 z Uredbo (EU) št. 875/2012 [10] začela preiskavo glede morebitnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 990/2011 na uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK, z uvozom koles, poslanim iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije ali ne, in o registraciji takšnega uvoza („preiskava proti izogibanju“).
In May 2013, the Council, by Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 [11] (the ‘anti-circumvention Regulation’), extended the anti-dumping measures in force on imports of bicycles originating in the PRC to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not, as these imports were found to circumvent the measures by transhipment and/or assembly operations within the meaning of Article 13(1) and (2) of the basic Regulation.
Svet je maja 2013 z Uredbo (EU) št. 501/2013 [11] („uredba proti izogibanju protidampinškim ukrepom“) razširil veljavne protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK na uvoz koles, poslanim iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije ali ne, saj se je za ta uvoz ugotovilo izogibanje ukrepom s pretovarjanjem in/ali dejavnostmi sestavljanja v skladu s členom 13(1) in (2) osnovne uredbe.
Parallel anti-subsidy investigation
Vzporedna protisubvencijska preiskava
On 27 April 2012, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [12], the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of bicycles originating in the PRC (‘anti-subsidy investigation’).
Komisija je 27. aprila 2012 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [12], napovedala začetek protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom koles s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo („protisubvencijska preiskava“).
In November 2012 the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [13], that the findings in the anti-circumvention investigation may be used in the anti-subsidy investigation mentioned in recitals 14 and 15.
Komisija je novembra 2012 v obvestilu, objavljenemu v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [13] sporočila, da se lahko ugotovitve preiskave proti izogibanju uporabijo v protisubvencijski preiskavi, navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 14 in 15.
In May 2013, the Commission, by Decision 2013/227/EU [14], terminated the anti-subsidy investigation without imposing measures.
Komisija je maja 2013 s Sklepom (2013/227/EU) [14] zaključila protisubvencijsko preiskavo brez uvedbe ukrepov.
The Commission officially notified known Union producers, known associations of Union producers, the known exporting producers in the PRC and an association of Chinese producers, the representatives of the country concerned, known importers and associations of importers, known Union producers of bicycle parts and their associations and known association of users of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je znane proizvajalce Unije, znana združenja proizvajalcev Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK in združenje kitajskih proizvajalcev, predstavnike zadevne države, znane uvoznike ter združenja uvoznikov, znane proizvajalce delov koles Unije in njihova združenja ter znano združenje uporabnikov uradno obvestila o začetku preiskave.
In view of the t high number of exporting producers, Union producers and unrelated importers that was apparent, sampling was provided for in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov, proizvajalcev Unije in nepovezanih uvoznikov je bilo v obvestilu o začetku postopka predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and if so, to select samples, all exporting producers and their known association, all Union producers and unrelated importers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the Notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali bo vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru izbrala vzorce, je pozvala vse proizvajalce izvoznike in njihovo znano združenje ter vse proizvajalce Unije in nepovezane uvoznike, naj se ji javijo in ji za obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011 v skladu z obvestilom o začetku postopka predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom.
Since the representatives of the country concerned did not come forward at initiation, the Commission contacted about 70 Chinese companies already known to the Commission services from the previous investigation.
Ker se predstavniki zadevne države ob začetku preiskave niso javili, je Komisija vzpostavila stik z okrog 70 kitajskimi družbami, ki so službam Komisije že znane iz prejšnje preiskave.
At a later stage, when the anti-subsidy investigation mentioned in recital 16 was initiated, the Commission identified around 300 additional Chinese exporting producers that were contacted in the context of this interim review as well.
Komisija je pozneje, ko se je protisubvencijska preiskava, navedena v uvodni izjavi 16, že začela, prepoznala še okrog 300 dodatnih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, s katerimi je prav tako vzpostavila stik v okviru tega vmesnega pregleda.
In spite of the Commission’s efforts to obtain cooperation, only eight Chinese groups of exporting producers came forward, out of which only four reported exports to the Union in the review investigation period (‘RIP’) defined in recital 37 below, representing less than 4 % of the total imports from the PRC of bicycles in the RIP.
Kljub prizadevanjem Komisije za vzpostavitev sodelovanja se je javilo le osem kitajskih skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov, od katerih so le štiri poročale o izvozu v Unijo v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („OPP“), opredeljenim v uvodni izjavi 37, kar znaša manj kot 4 % celotnega uvoza iz koles LRK v OPP.
As stated in recitals 63 to 64 and 131 below, for one Chinese exporting group, Giant China, application of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation was warranted.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 63 in 64 ter 131, je bila za eno kitajsko izvozno skupino, tj. Giant China, utemeljena uporaba člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, the cooperation of the Chinese exporting producers decreased even further.
Zato se je sodelovanje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov še dodatno zmanjšalo.
As explained in recitals 32 to 35 below, a sample of Union producers was selected.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 32 do 35, se je izbral vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
As explained in recital 36 below, it was decided that sampling was not necessary for unrelated importers.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 36, je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje za nepovezane uvoznike ni potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all other parties that so requested within the deadlines set out in the Notice of initiation, namely the sampled Union producers, the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC, unrelated importers that made themselves known as described in recital 36 below and to the known producers of bicycle parts in the Union.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem stranem, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim stranem, ki so to zahtevale, v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, in sicer vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK, nepovezanim uvoznikom, ki so se javili, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 36, in znanim proizvajalcem delov za kolesa v Uniji.
Replies to the questionnaires and other submissions were received from four groups of Chinese exporting producers and their representative, eight sampled Union producers, one association of users and eight associations of the Union producers, 53 bicycle parts producers and one association of producers of bicycle parts.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike in druga stališča so poslale štiri skupine kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in njihov predstavnik, osem vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, eno združenje uporabnikov in osem združenj proizvajalcev Unije, 53 proizvajalcev delov za kolesa in eno združenje proizvajalcev delov za kolesa.
None of the contacted unrelated importers submitted a questionnaire reply.
Nobeden od nepovezanih uvoznikov, s katerimi je bil vzpostavljen stik, ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of dumping, resulting injury, causality and Union interest and carried out verifications at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za ugotovitev dampinga, posledične škode, vzročnosti in interesa Unije, ter izvedla preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Producers of bicycles in the Union
proizvajalci koles v Uniji
Accell Hunland, Hungary
Accell Hunland, Madžarska,
Decathlon RGVS, Portugal
Decathlon RGVS, Portugalska,
Denver srl, Italy
Denver srl, Italija,
SC Eurosport DHS, Romania
SC Eurosport DHS, Romunija,
Koninklijke Gazelle, Netherlands
Koninklijke Gazelle, Nizozemska,
Maxcom Ltd, Bulgaria
Maxcom Ltd, Bolgarija,
MIFA, Germany
MIFA, Nemčija in
Sprick Rowery, Poland
Sprick Rowery, Poljska;
Producers of bicycle parts in the Union
proizvajalci delov za kolesa v Uniji
Chimsport, Romania
Chimsport, Romunija in
Telai Olagnero, Italy
Telai Olagnero, Italija;
In light of the need to establish a normal value for exporting producers in the PRC to which MET might not be granted, a verification visit to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country took place at the premises of the following companies:
Ker je bilo potrebno določiti normalno vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, ki jim TGO morda ne bo odobren, je bil preveritveni obisk z namenom določitve normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države opravljen v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Distribuidora de Bicicletas Benotto, S.A. DE C.V., Mexico City, Mexico,
Distribuidora de Bicicletas Benotto, S.A. DE C.V., Mexico City, Mehika,
Bicicletas Magistroni, Mexico City, Mexico,
Bicicletas Magistroni, Mexico City, Mehika in
Bicicletas Mercurio SA DE CV, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
Bicicletas Mercurio SA DE CV, San Luis Potosi, Mehika.
Following the disclosure of essential facts and considerations (‘the disclosure’) some parties argued that an inadequate period was provided for the parties to comment.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov („razkritje“) so nekatere strani trdile, da se za pripombe strani ni zagotovilo ustrezno obdobje.
In this respect it is noted that the parties were provided sufficient time to comment in accordance with Article 20(5) of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so strani v skladu s členom 20(5) osnovne uredbe imele na voljo dovolj časa za pripombe.
The comment is therefore dismissed.
Pripomba se zato ne upošteva.
The Commission announced in the Notice of initiation that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku najavila, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
This sample consisted of eight companies, out of over 380 Union producers that were known prior to the initiation of the investigation, selected in particular on the basis of the largest representative volume of production and sales that can reasonably be investigated within the time available taking into account the geographical spread.
Ta vzorec je bil sestavljen iz osmih družb od več kot 380 proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili znani pred začetkom preiskave, izbran zlasti na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje, ki se lahko ustrezno preišče v razpoložljivem času ob upoštevanju geografske odmaknjenosti.
The sample covered the largest producing countries ranked according to the production volumes.
Vzorec je zajel največje proizvodne države, razvrščene glede na obseg proizvodnje.
For each of these countries, the companies included in the sample were among the largest representative cooperating producers.
Družbe, vključene v vzorec, so bile med največjimi reprezentativnimi sodelujočimi proizvajalci v vsaki od teh držav.
The sample also captured entities from the largest cooperating groups.
Vzorec je zajel tudi subjekte iz največjih sodelujočih skupin.
Particular attention was given in this case to sampling an equal number of companies from the old and the new Member States.
Posebna pozornost je bila v tem primeru namenjena vzorčenju enakega števila družb iz starih in novih držav članic.
The sample represented around 25 % of the total estimated Union production and sales during the RIP.
Vzorec je zajemal okrog 25 % celotne ocenjene proizvodnje Unije in prodaje v OPP.
Certain interested parties raised objections concerning the sampling of Union producers.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so ugovarjale vzorčenju proizvajalcev Unije.
They claimed that: (i) the provisional sample included only certain legal entities pertaining to groups of related companies rather than all legal entities making up the full economic entity producing the product at issue; and (ii) the proposal included a company that has been recently operating at a loss, whereas the Union producers were thriving during that period.
Trdile so, da: (i) je začasni vzorec vključeval le nekatere pravne subjekte, ki se nanašajo na skupine povezanih družb, namesto vseh pravnih subjektov, ki sestavljajo celotni gospodarski subjekt, ki proizvaja zadevni izdelek, in (ii) je predlog vključeval družbo, ki je v zadnjem času poslovala z izgubo, medtem ko so bili proizvajalci Unije v tem obdobju zelo uspešni.
In addition, it was claimed that these losses were not linked to the product concerned.
Poleg tega so trdile, da te izgube niso bile povezane z zadevnim izdelkom.
These arguments were dismissed on the following grounds: (i) The entities belonging to larger groups that were found to operate independently from other subsidiaries of the same group were considered representative of the Union industry and there was therefore no need to investigate the entire group on a consolidated basis. (ii) The interested party concerned did not substantiate its claim that the company selected in the sample and which allegedly realised losses would indeed not be representative for the Union industry.
Ti argumenti so bili zavrnjeni iz naslednjih razlogov: (i) subjekti, ki pripadajo večjim skupinam, za katere se je ugotovilo, da poslujejo neodvisno od drugih hčerinskih družb iste skupine, so se obravnavali kot reprezentativni za industrijo Unije in zato ni bilo treba preiskati celotne skupine na konsolidirani osnovi; (ii) zadevne zainteresirane strani niso utemeljile svoje trditve, da podjetje, ki je bilo izbrano v vzorcu in je domnevno poslovalo z izgubo, dejansko ne bi bilo reprezentativno za industrijo Unije.
Finally, while the selected sample should be representative for the Union industry, the companies selected do not necessarily need to be homogeneous.
Medtem ko bi izbrani vzorec moral biti reprezentativen za industrijo Unije, za izbrane družbe ni nujno, da so homogene.
The claim of this party had to be therefore rejected.
Zato je bilo treba trditev te strani zavrniti.
Sampling of unrelated importers was also provided for in the Notice of Initiation.
V obvestilu o začetku je bilo določeno tudi vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov.
All known unrelated importers were contacted upon initiation.
Z vsemi znanimi nepovezanimi uvozniki je bil ob začetku vzpostavljen stik.
Given the small number of replies received in the framework of the sampling exercise, no sample was selected.
Zaradi majhnega števila odgovorov, prejetih v okviru vzorčenja, vzorec ni bil izbran.
All unrelated importers that came forward were invited to cooperate and received a questionnaire.
Vsi nepovezani uvozniki, ki so se javili, so bili povabljeni k sodelovanju in so prejeli vprašalnik.
None of the unrelated importers provided a questionnaire reply, nor did they cooperate further in the present investigation.
Nobeden od nepovezanih uvoznikov ni vrnil izpolnjenega vprašalnika niti ni na drug način sodeloval v sedanji preiskavi.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of trends in the context of the analysis of injury covered the period from January 2008 to the end of the RIP (the ‘period considered’).
Proučitev trendov v smislu analize škode je zajemala obdobje od januarja 2008 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product subject to this review investigation is bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles but excluding unicycles), not motorised (‘the product under review’) originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes 87120030 and ex87120070.
Izdelek v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zajema dvokolesa in druga podobna kolesa (tudi dostavne tricikle, a brez enokolesnikov) brez motornega pogona („izdelek, ki se pregleduje“) s poreklom iz LRK, ki so trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN 87120030 in ex87120070.
ATB (al-terrain bicycles including mountain bicycles 24″ or 26″),
ATB (kolesa za vse terene, vključno z gorskimi kolesi, 24″ ali 26″),
All types of bicycles as defined above have the same basic physical and technical characteristics.
Vse vrste koles, kot so določene zgoraj, imajo enake osnovne fizčne in tehnične značilnosti.
On this basis, it was concluded that all the categories form one single product.
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da vse kategorije zajemajo en sam izdelek.
One party argued that the different types of bicycles have significantly different characteristics and intended uses and also significantly different prices, while from the consumers’ perspective these different types of bicycle are not interchangeable.
Ena stran je trdila, da imajo različne vrste koles znatno različne značilnosti in predvidene rabe ter znatno različne cene, medtem ko z vidika potrošnikov te različne vrste koles niso nezamenljive.
Furthermore, it was argued that steel and aluminium bicycles are not considered interchangeable and that their prices are different as well.
Poleg tega je trdila, da se kolesa, izdelana iz jekla in aluminija, ne štejejo za zamenljiva in so njihove cene prav tako različne.
In support of its argument, the party submitted a study about the basic physical and technical characteristics and uses of five different product types as well as their interchangeability.
Za utemeljitev tega argumenta je zadevna stran predložila študijo o osnovnih fizičnih in tehničnih lastnostih ter uporabah petih različnih vrst izdelka in njihovi zamenljivosti.
It should be noted that the study was allegedly based on the replies of 36 individuals, however it is not clear how the respondents have been chosen.
Treba je poudariti, da študija domnevno temelji na odgovorih 36 posameznikov, vendar ni jasno, kako so bili anketiranci izbrani.
It seems furthermore that it was prepared specifically for the current investigation.
Nadalje se zdi, da je bila pripravljena posebej za sedanjo preiskavo.
The study does not include any quantifiable data.
Študija ne vključuje količinsko opredeljenih podatkov.
It is noted that the content of this study is apparently based on statements of customers and/or bicycles producers rather than verifiable evidence.
Ugotovljeno je, da vsebina te študije očitno temelji na izjavah strank in/ali proizvajalcev koles, namesto na preverljivih dokazih.