natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In exceptional cases of urgency where early access is necessary to respond to a specific and actual threat related to terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences, the verifying authority should process the request immediately and only carry out the verification afterwards.
V izjemno nujnih primerih, kadar je predčasni dostop do podatkov potreben za odziv na posebno in dejansko grožnjo, povezano s terorističnimi dejanji ali drugimi hudimi kaznivimi dejanji, bi moral organ, pristojen za preverjanje, zahtevo najprej obdelati in šele naknadno opraviti preverjanje.
The designated authority and the verifying authority may be part of the same organisation, if permitted under national law, but the verifying authority should act independently when performing its tasks under this Regulation.
Imenovani organ in organ, pristojen za preverjanje, sta lahko del iste organizacije, če je to dovoljeno v okviru nacionalnega prava, vendar bi moral organ, pristojen za preverjanje, pri opravljanju nalog v okviru te uredbe delovati neodvisno.
For the purposes of protection of personal data, and to exclude systematic comparisons which should be forbidden, the processing of Eurodac data should only take place in specific cases and when it is necessary for the purposes of preventing, detecting or investigating terrorist offences or other serious criminal offences.
Da se zaščitijo osebni podatki in da se ne dopuščajo sistematične primerjave, ki bi jih bilo treba prepovedati, bi bilo treba obdelovanje podatkov iz sistema Eurodac opraviti le v posebnih primerih ter po potrebi zaradi preprečevanja, odkrivanja ali preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
A specific case exists in particular when the request for comparison is connected to a specific and concrete situation or to a specific and concrete danger associated with a terrorist offence or other serious criminal offence, or to specific persons in respect of whom there are serious grounds for believing that they will commit or have committed any such offence.
Poseben primer obstaja predvsem takrat, kadar je zahteva za primerjavo povezana bodisi z določeno in konkretno situacijo bodisi z določeno in konkretno nevarnostjo, povezano s terorističnim dejanjem ali drugim hudim kaznivim dejanjem bodisi z določenimi osebami, glede katerih obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za sum, da bodo storile ali so storile kakršna koli takšna kazniva dejanja.
A specific case also exists when the request for comparison is connected to a person who is the victim of a terrorist offence or other serious criminal offence.
Poseben primer obstaja tudi, kadar je zahteva za primerjavo povezana z osebo, ki je žrtev terorističnega dejanja ali drugega hudega kaznivega dejanja.
The designated authorities and Europol should thus only request a comparison with Eurodac when they have reasonable grounds to believe that such a comparison will provide information that will substantially assist them in preventing, detecting or investigating a terrorist offence or other serious criminal offence.
Imenovani organi in Europol bi morali primerjavo s sistemom Eurodac zahtevati torej le, če imajo utemeljene razloge za domnevo, da bodo s takšno primerjavo podatkov dobili informacije, ki jim bodo znatno pomagale pri preprečevanju, odkrivanju ali preiskovanju terorističnih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
In addition, access should be allowed only on condition that comparisons with the national fingerprint databases of the Member State and with the automated fingerprinting identification systems of all other Member States under Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime [12] did not lead to the establishment of the identity of the data subject.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba dostop dovoliti le pod pogojem, da se s primerjavo s podatki iz nacionalnih podatkovnih zbirk prstnih odtisov in iz sistemov za avtomatsko identifikacijo prstnih odtisov vseh drugih držav članic v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2008/615/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o poglobitvi čezmejnega sodelovanja, zlasti na področju boja proti terorizmu in čezmejnemu kriminalu [12], ni ugotovila identiteta posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo podatki.
That condition requires the requesting Member State to conduct comparisons with the automated fingerprinting identification systems of all other Member States under Decision 2008/615/JHA which are technically available, unless that Member State can justify that there are reasonable grounds to believe that it would not lead to the establishment of the identity of the data subject.
Za izpolnitev tega pogoja mora država članica prosilka opraviti primerjave s podatki iz sistemov za avtomatsko identifikacijo prstnih odtisov vseh drugih držav članic v skladu s Sklepom 2008/615/PNZ, ki so tehnično na voljo, razen če ta država članica lahko to upraviči z utemeljenimi razlogi za domnevo, da se pri tem ne bo ugotovila identiteta posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo podatki.
Such reasonable grounds exist in particular where the specific case does not present any operational or investigative link to a given Member State.
Taki utemeljeni razlogi zlasti obstajajo, če posamezen primer operativno ali za namene preiskovanja ni povezan s posamezno državo članico.
That condition requires prior legal and technical implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA by the requesting Member State in the area of fingerprint data, as it should not be permitted to conduct a Eurodac check for law enforcement purposes where those above steps have not been first taken.
S tem pogojem se zahteva, da država članica prosilka na področju podatkov o prstnih odtisih predhodno pravno in tehnično izvede Sklep 2008/615/PNZ, saj preverjanje podatkov v sistemu Eurodac zaradi kazenskega pregona ne bi smelo biti dopuščeno, če niso najprej opravljeni omenjeni koraki.
Prior to searching Eurodac, designated authorities should also, provided that the conditions for a comparison are met, consult the Visa Information System under Council Decision 2008/633/JHA of 23 June 2008 concerning access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by designated authorities of Member States and by Europol for the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences [13].
Imenovani organi bi morali pred iskanjem v sistemu Eurodac opraviti tudi poizvedbo v vizumskem informacijskem sistemu (VIS) v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2008/633/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o dostopu imenovanih organov držav članic in Europola do vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) za iskanje podatkov za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj [13], če so izpolnjeni pogoji za primerjavo.
For the purpose of efficient comparison and exchange of personal data, Member States should fully implement and make use of the existing international agreements as well as of Union law concerning the exchange of personal data already in force, in particular of Decision 2008/615/JHA.
Države članice bi morale za učinkovito primerjavo in izmenjavo osebnih podatkov v celoti izvrševati in uporabljati veljavne mednarodne sporazume, pa tudi veljavno pravo Unije o izmenjavi osebnih podatkov, zlasti Sklep 2008/615/PNZ.
The best interests of the child should be a primary consideration for Member States when applying this Regulation.
Največja korist otroka bi morala biti najpomembnejše vodilo držav članic pri uporabi te uredbe.
Where the requesting Member State establishes that Eurodac data pertain to a minor, these data may only be used for law enforcement purposes by the requesting Member State in accordance with that State's laws applicable to minors and in accordance with the obligation to give primary consideration to the best interests of the child.
Kadar država članica prosilka ugotovi, da se podatki iz sistema Eurodac nanašajo na mladoletnika, lahko država članica prosilka te podatke uporabi le za namene kazenskega pregona v skladu z zakonodajo navedene države, ki velja za mladoletnike in v skladu z obveznostjo, da najprej upošteva največjo korist otroka.
While the non-contractual liability of the Union in connection with the operation of the Eurodac system will be governed by the relevant provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), it is necessary to lay down specific rules for the non-contractual liability of the Member States in connection with the operation of the system.
Medtem ko bodo nepogodbeno odgovornost Unije v zvezi z delovanjem sistema Eurodac urejale ustrezne določbe Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), je za nepogodbeno odgovornost držav članic v zvezi z delovanjem sistema treba vzpostaviti posebna pravila.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the creation of a system for the comparison of fingerprint data to assist the implementation of Union asylum policy, cannot, by its very nature, be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ker cilja te uredbe, namreč vzpostaviti sistem za primerjavo podatkov o prstnih odtisih za pomoč pri izvajanju azilne politike Unije, že zaradi njegove narave države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [14] applies to the processing of personal data by the Member States carried out in application of this Regulation unless such processing is carried out by the designated or verifying authorities of the Member States for the purposes of the prevention, detection or investigation of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences.
Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [14] se uporablja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki jo skladno s to uredbo izvajajo države članice, razen če tako obdelavo izvajajo imenovani organi držav članic ali organi držav članic, pristojni za preverjanje, zaradi preprečevanja, odkrivanja ali preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
The processing of personal data by the authorities of the Member States for the purposes of the prevention, detection or investigation of terrorist offences or of other serious criminal offences pursuant to this Regulation should be subject to a standard of protection of personal data under their national law which complies with Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters [15].
Za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki jo izvajajo organi držav članic zaradi preprečevanja, odkrivanja ali preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj ali drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj v skladu s to uredbo bi moral veljati standard varstva osebnih podatkov v okviru nacionalnega prava, ki je v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah [15].
The principles set out in Directive 95/46/EC regarding the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, notably their right to privacy, with regard to the processing of personal data should be supplemented or clarified, in particular as far as certain sectors are concerned.
Načela iz Direktive 95/46/ES glede varstva pravic in svoboščin posameznikov, predvsem njihove pravice do zasebnosti, bi se morala pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov dopolniti ali razjasniti, zlasti na nekaterih področjih.
Transfers of personal data obtained by a Member State or Europol pursuant to this Regulation from the Central System to any third country or international organisation or private entity established in or outside the Union should be prohibited, in order to ensure the right to asylum and to safeguard applicants for international protection from having their data disclosed to a third country.
Prepovedati bi bilo treba prenos osebnih podatkov, ki jih na podlagi te uredbe pridobi država članica ali Europol iz centralnega sistema, kateri koli tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji ali zasebnemu subjektu s sedežem v Uniji ali zunaj nje, da se zagotovi pravica do azila in da so prosilci za mednarodno zaščito zaščiteni pred tem, da bi se njihovi podatki razkrili tretji državi.
This implies that Member States should not transfer information obtained from the Central System concerning: the Member State(s) of origin; the place and date of application for international protection; the reference number used by the Member State of origin; the date on which the fingerprints were taken as well as the date on which the Member State(s) transmitted the data to Eurodac; the operator user ID; and any information relating to any transfer of the data subject under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
To pomeni, da države članice ne bi smele pošiljati informacij, pridobljenih iz centralnega sistema, ki se nanašajo na: državo(-e) članico(-e) izvora; kraj in datum vložitve prošnje za mednarodno zaščito; sklicno številko, ki jo je uporabila država članica izvora; datum odvzema prstnih odtisov in datum, na katerega je(so) država(-e) članica(-e) podatke posredovala(-e) v sistem Eurodac; identifikacijsko številko operaterja; in vse informacije, povezane s kakršnim koli prenosom podatkov v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013.
That prohibition should be without prejudice to the right of Member States to transfer such data to third countries to which Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 applies, in order to ensure that Member States have the possibility of cooperating with such third countries for the purposes of this Regulation.
Ta prepoved ne bi smela posegati v pravico držav članic do pošiljanja takih podatkov tretjim državam, v katerih se uporablja Uredba (EU) št. 604/2013, zato da imajo države članice za namene te uredbe možnost sodelovanja s takimi tretjimi državami.
National supervisory authorities should monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States, and the supervisory authority set up by Decision 2009/371/JHA should monitor the lawfulness of data processing activities performed by Europol.
Nacionalni nadzorni organi bi morali spremljati, ali države članice zakonito obdelujejo osebne podatke, nadzorni organ, vzpostavljen s Sklepom 2009/371/PNZ, pa bi moral spremljati, ali Europol zakonito izvaja dejavnosti obdelave podatkov.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [16], and in particular Articles 21 and 22 thereof concerning confidentiality and security of processing, applies to the processing of personal data by Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies carried out in application of this Regulation.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov v institucijah, organih, uradih in agencijah Unije pri uporabi te uredbe poteka v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [16] ter zlasti s členoma 21 in 22 navedene uredbe, ki se nanašata na zaupnost in varnost obdelave.
However, certain points should be clarified in respect of the responsibility for the processing of data and of the supervision of data protection, bearing in mind that data protection is a key factor in the successful operation of Eurodac and that data security, high technical quality and lawfulness of consultations are essential to ensure the smooth and proper functioning of Eurodac as well as to facilitate the application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
Nekatere točke, ki se nanašajo na odgovornost za obdelavo podatkov in nadzor varstva podatkov, pa bi bilo treba pojasniti in pri tem upoštevati, da je varstvo podatkov ključno za uspešno delovanje sistema Eurodac ter da so varnost podatkov, visoka tehnološka kakovost in zakonitost poizvedb bistvene za nemoteno in pravilno delovanje sistema Eurodac in za lažjo uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013.
The data subject should be informed of the purpose for which his or her data will be processed within Eurodac, including a description of the aims of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, and of the use to which law enforcement authorities may put his or her data.
Posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo podatki, bi bilo treba obvestiti o namenu, za katerega se bodo njegovi podatki obdelali v sistemu Eurodac, vključno z opisom ciljev iz Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013, ter o tem, kako utegnejo organi kazenskega pregona te podatke uporabiti.
It is appropriate that national supervisory authorities monitor the lawfulness of the processing of personal data by the Member States, whilst the European Data Protection Supervisor, as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, should monitor the activities of the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies in relation to the processing of personal data carried out in application of this Regulation.
Primerno je, da nacionalni nadzorni organi spremljajo zakonitost obdelave osebnih podatkov, ki jo izvajajo države članice, Evropski nadzornik za varstvo osebnih podatkov pa bi moral na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 spremljati dejavnosti institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov pri uporabi te uredbe.
Member States, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should ensure that the national and European supervisory authorities are able to supervise the use of and access to Eurodac data adequately.
Države članice, Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija bi morali zagotoviti, da so nacionalni in evropski nadzorni organi zmožni ustrezno nadzirati uporabo podatkov iz sistema Eurodac in dostop do njih.
It is appropriate to monitor and evaluate the performance of Eurodac at regular intervals, including in terms of whether law enforcement access has led to indirect discrimination against applicants for international protection, as raised in the Commission's evaluation of the compliance of this Regulation with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ('the Charter').
Primerno je, da se delovanje sistema Eurodac spremlja in ocenjuje v rednih časovnih presledkih, pri čemer je treba preverjati tudi, ali je dostop zaradi kazenskega pregona povzročil posredno diskriminacijo prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, kot je omenjeno v oceni Komisije o skladnosti te uredbe z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina).
The Agency should submit an annual report on the activities of the Central System to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Agencija bi morala Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti letno poročilo o dejavnostih centralnega sistema.
Member States should provide for a system of effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties to sanction the processing of data entered in the Central System contrary to the purpose of Eurodac.
Države članice bi morale določiti sistem učinkovitih, sorazmernih in odvračilnih kazni, s katerimi bi sankcionirale obdelavo podatkov iz centralnega sistema, ki je v nasprotju z namenom sistema Eurodac.
It is necessary that Member States be informed of the status of particular asylum procedures, with a view to facilitating the adequate application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
Države članice je treba obvestiti o statusu posameznih azilnih postopkov, da bi se olajšala ustrezna uporaba Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, posebej uveljavljena z Listino.
In particular, this Regulation seeks to ensure full respect for the protection of personal data and for the right to seek international protection, and to promote the application of Articles 8 and 18 of the Charter.
Namen te uredbe je zlasti poskrbeti za polno spoštovanje varstva osebnih podatkov in pravice do iskanja mednarodne zaščite ter spodbujati uporabo členov 8 in 18 Listine.
This Regulation should therefore be applied accordingly.
Ta uredba bi se zato morala ustrezno uporabljati.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
In accordance with Article 3 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, the United Kingdom has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, je Združeno kraljestvo podalo uradno obvestilo, da želi sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te uredbe.
In accordance with Article 1 and 2 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, Ireland is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola, Irska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
It is appropriate to restrict the territorial scope of this Regulation so as to align it on the territorial scope of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013,
Ozemeljsko veljavnost te uredbe je primerno omejiti, tako da se prilagodi ozemeljski veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 –
Purpose of "Eurodac"
Namen sistema Eurodac
A system known as "Eurodac" is hereby established, the purpose of which shall be to assist in determining which Member State is to be responsible pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 for examining an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national or a stateless person, and otherwise to facilitate the application of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 under the conditions set out in this Regulation.
S to uredbo se vzpostavi sistem pod imenom Eurodac, katerega namen je pomoč pri določanju države članice, ki je v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013 odgovorna za obravnavanje prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države ali oseba brez državljanstva, in tudi sicer omogočanje lažje uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 pod pogoji iz te uredbe.
This Regulation also lays down the conditions under which Member States' designated authorities and the European Police Office (Europol) may request the comparison of fingerprint data with those stored in the Central System for law enforcement purposes.
Ta uredba določa tudi pogoje, pod katerimi lahko imenovani organi držav članic in Evropski policijski urad (Europol) zahtevajo primerjavo podatkov o prstnih odtisih s tistimi iz centralnega sistema za namene kazenskega pregona.