natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
expects the Authority to inform the discharge authority on this matter before October 2013 if possible;
pričakuje, da bo agencija organ za podelitev razrešnice obvestila o tej zadevi, po možnosti pred oktobrom 2013;
Calls on the Authority to start a structured dialogue with civil society on matters relating to conflicts of interest and to invite those organisations concerned to openly discuss matters of common interest based on a agreed agenda and to inform the discharge authority on the outcome of these deliberations at least twice a year;
poziva agencijo, naj začne strukturiran dialog s civilno družbo o zadevah, ki se nanašajo na navzkrižja interesov, ter povabi zadevne organizacije, da se odprto pogovorijo o zadevah, ki so v skupnem interesu, na podlagi dogovorjene agende, ter organ za podelitev razrešnice vsaj dvakrat letno obvestijo o izidu teh razprav;
notes that the Authority has intensified this dialogue with stakeholders and civil society;
ugotavlja, da je agencija okrepila ta dialog z interesnimi skupinami in civilno družbo;
considers that those dialogues need to be institutionalised and taken into account by the Management Board of the Authority;
meni, da mora upravni odbor agencije te dialoge institucionalizirati in upoštevati;
Is concerned that the Authority was criticised for a lack of transparency with respect to the publication of annual declarations of interest and the absence of training on conflicts of interest;
je zaskrbljen, da je bila agencija deležna kritike zaradi pomanjkanja preglednosti glede objave letnih izjav o interesih in zaradi pomanjkanja usposabljanja o navzkrižju interesov;
demands that action be taken on those issues and urges the Authority to report back to the discharge authority on the activities taken;
zahteva, da se glede tega ukrepa in poziva agencijo, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o sprejetih ukrepih;
welcomes the fact that all annual declarations of interests of the Authority’s experts are now published and accessible on the Authority’s website;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so sedaj vse letne izjave o interesih strokovnjakov agencije objavljene in dostopne na spletni strani agencije;
Urges the Authority to keep conflicts of interest high on the priority list in order to protect its credibility and to safeguard the public’s trust in food safety, and to indicate, as detailed and precisely as possible, how it will implement the main recommendations from the report of the Court of Auditors and from Parliament’s resolutions;
poziva agencijo, naj uvrsti navzkrižja interesov na vrh liste prednostnih nalog, da zavaruje svojo verodostojnost in ohrani zaupanje javnosti v varnost hrane ter naj, kolikor je mogoče podrobno in natančno navede, kako bo izvedla glavna priporočila iz poročila Računskega sodišča in iz resolucije Parlamenta;
urges the Authority to consider conflicts of interest with the utmost care, given the start of the revision of its founding regulation, which provides an opportunity to reach the highest governance standards as described by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD), and which would influence positively the Authority’s governance structure, independence and scientific quality;
poziva agencijo, naj navzkrižja interesov zelo skrbno preuči zaradi začetka pregleda ustanovitvene uredbe, ki ponuja priložnost za doseganje najvišjih standardov upravljanja, kot je opisala Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD), in bi pozitivno vplivali na upravno strukturo agencije, njeno neodvisnost in znanstveno kakovost;
considers that the revision of the founding regulation of the Authority is a major opportunity to initiate radical change at the Authority, who is responsible for objective scientific advice on food and environmental safety at Union level;
meni, da je pregled ustanovitvene uredbe velika priložnost za začetek radikalnih sprememb v agenciji, ki je pristojna za objektivno znanstveno svetovanje o hrani in okoljski varnosti na ravni Unije;
Strongly suggests that in order to prevent the Authority’s staff from moving directly from their position to work in a similar post in industry or related lobby-agency, or vice versa, an adequate cooling off period should be established and respected for the specific areas of work, in order to avoid conflicts of interest;
toplo priporoča, da se v izogib neposrednemu prehodu osebja s položaja v agenciji na podobno mesto v industriji ali v povezane lobije, oziroma obratno, določi prehodno obdobje, ki ga je treba upoštevati za posebna področja dela, da se tako izognemo navzkrižju interesov;
Notes that the Authority has taken a number of steps following the Court of Auditors’ audit and publication of the Special Report No 15/2012, inter alia:
ugotavlja, da je agencija na podlagi revizije Računskega sodišča in objave posebnega poročila št. 15/2012 sprejela številne, spodaj naštete ukrepe:
in 2007, the Authority introduced a comprehensive framework for avoiding potential conflicts of interest, and since then, it has regularly reviewed and updated it,
leta 2007 je uvedla celovit okvir v izogib morebitnemu navzkrižju interesov, ki ga od tedaj redno pregleduje in posodablja,
since 2011, the Authority has strengthened that framework with the adoption of its revised policy on independence and scientific decision-making processes;
od leta 2011 je ta okvir okrepila s sprejetjem spremenjene politike neodvisnosti in postopkov znanstvenega sprejemanja odločitev;
is, however, concerned about the adequacy of the revised policy, pointing to numerous cases of conflict of interests exposed in 2012 by two watchdog non-governmental organisations (NGOs) - Corporate Europe Observatory and Earth Open Source;
vendar je zaskrbljen zaradi primernosti spremenjene politike in navaja številne primere navzkrižja interesov, ki sta jih leta 2012 ugotovili nadzorni nevladni organizaciji – Evropski observatorij za podjetja in Earth Open Source;
demands that further improvements, including the banning of links with industry-related bodies, be made to the Authority’s independence policy,
zahteva, da se politiko neodvisnosti agencije še dodatno izboljša, vključno s prepovedjo vezi z organi, povezanimi z industrijo,
at the end of 2013, a review of the Authority’s policy and implementing rules on independence is scheduled,
za konec leta 2013 je napovedala pregled svoje politike in izvedbenih pravil o neodvisnosti,
in July 2012, the Authority applied the framework provided by the Commission on ethics and integrity and has adopted a specific gift policy,
julija 2012 je vpeljala okvir, ki ga je posredovala Komisija, za etiko in integriteto ter sprejela posebno politiko daril,
in 2012, an ethics adviser was appointed;
leta 2012 je imenovala svetovalca za etiko;
urges the Authority to continue to act on the recommendations of the Court of Auditors in order to avoid any conflicts of interest among its various governing and operational structures and to report to the discharge authority on the implementation of the abovementioned policies and procedures, as well as on any further developments as regards the management of conflicts of interest before October 2013;
poziva agencijo, naj še naprej izvaja priporočila Računskega sodišča, da se izogne navzkrižju interesov med različnimi upravnimi in operativnimi strukturami ter organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o izvajanju zgoraj omenjenih politik in postopkov kot tudi o nadaljnjih dogodkih glede obvladovanja navzkrižja interesov pred oktobrom 2013;
Acknowledges the Authority’s efforts to improve its prevention and management of conflict of interests;
priznava prizadevanja agencije za izboljšanje preprečevanja navzkrižja interesov in njihovega upravljanja;
notes, however, that the independence and competence of its external experts remain questioned by watchdog NGOs or even fellow food safety experts as for instance in the case of the working group on endocrine disruptors experts;
vendar ugotavlja, da nadzorne nevladne organizacije oziroma celo sodelavci strokovnjaki za varnost hrane dvomijo o neodvisnosti in pristojnosti njenega zunanjega osebja, kot v primeru delovne skupine strokovnjakov o endokrinih motilcih;
emphasises the fact that as a consequence, the Authority’s work is challenged such as during the Joint JRC-NIEHS Workshop on Low Dose Effects of Endocrine Active Chemicals in Berlin in December 2012;
poudarja dejstvo, da se posledično delu agencije oporeka, kot med skupno delavnico JRC-NIEHS o vplivih nizkih odmerkov endokrinih aktivnih kemikalij, ki je potekala v Berlinu decembra 2012;
Notes that the Management Board elected its Chair in a publicly-held meeting;
ugotavlja, da je upravni odbor izvolil svojega predsednika na javni seji;
recalls, however, that in the 2010 discharge procedure, Parliament called for an open ballot for electing the Management Board’s Chair and expects its request to be implemented;
vendar opozarja, da je Parlament v postopku razrešnice za leto 2010 pozval k javnemu glasovanju za izvolitev predsednika upravnega odbora ter pričakuje, da bo ta zahteva uresničena;
Notes that the OECD guidelines, on which the Court of Auditors has based its work on the Special Report No 15/2012, while offering an international benchmark on the issue, are not designed for an agency and do not meet the specific needs of the decentralised agencies;
ugotavlja, da smernice OECD, na katerih temelji posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 15/2012, ki sicer ponujajo mednarodna merila v zvezi s tem, niso namenjene agencijam in ne izpolnjujejo specifičnih potreb decentraliziranih agencij;
commends the Commission’s intention to come up with guidelines on the management of conflicts of interest, as provided for in its ‘Roadmap on the follow-up to the Common Approach on EU decentralised agencies’;
izreka pohvalo za namero Komisije, da bo oblikovala smernice za obvladovanje navzkrižja interesov, kakor je določeno v njenem časovnem načrtu za ukrepanje na osnovi skupnega pristopa za decentralizirane agencije EU;
Underlines the Authority’s commitment to launch its first evaluation of a random sample of declarations of interest in October2012 to verify their coherence with its newly adopted independence policy and implementing rules;
poudarja zavezo agencije, da bo oktobra 2012 začela izvajati svojo prvo oceno naključnega vzorca izjav o interesih, da bi preverila njihovo skladnost z na novo sprejeto politiko neodvisnosti in izvedbenimi pravili;
notes however that protocols still needed to be completed, which led to the postponement of the evaluation;
vendar ugotavlja, da je treba protokole še dopolniti, kar je vodilo k preložitvi ocene;
calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority on the reasons behind this delay and on the calendar foreseen for the organisation of the evaluation;
poziva agencijo, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o razlogih za to zamudo in o predvidenem časovnem razporedu za organizacijo te ocene;
Welcomes the Authority’s plans to start a pilot project in 2013 to source part of the scientific work that is currently carried out by external experts within Working Groups in the area of regulated products;
pozdravlja načrte agencije, da bo leta 2013 začela izvajati pilotni projekt, s katerim bo v okviru agencije opravila del znanstvenega dela, ki ga trenutno opravljajo zunanji strokovnjaki znotraj delovnih skupin na področju reguliranih produktov;
notes that this initiative will kick-off in the areas of food ingredients and GMO;
ugotavlja, da se bo ta pobuda začela izvajati na področju živilskih sestavin in gensko spremenjenih organizmov;
requests that the Authority provide the discharge authority with more information on progress made;
od agencije zahteva, da organu za podelitev razrešnice ponudi več informacij o doseženem napredku;
Notes with satisfaction that since 2011, the Authority has introduced in its AAR a special section describing the actions taken to implement its independence policy, thus partly answering the recommendation formulated in Parliament’s resolution of 23 October 2012 on discharge to the Authority for the financial year 2010 [6];
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da od leta 2011 agencija v svoje letno poročilo o dejavnostih vključuje posebno poglavje, ki opisuje ukrepe, sprejete za izvajanje politike neodvisnosti, ter je tako delno odgovorila na priporočila iz resolucije Parlamenta z dne 23. oktobra 2012 o razrešnici za to agencijo za proračunsko leto 2010 [6];
Welcomes the fact that the curricula vitae of the Authority’s Executive Director, Senior management and panel experts are now available on its website together with their respective declaration of interest;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so življenjepisi izvršne direktorice agencije, višjega vodstva in skupine strokovnjakov zdaj objavljeni na spletnem mestu, prav tako kot njihove izjave o interesih;
notes the Authority’s efforts for greater transparency but remains of the opinion that these provisions should also apply to any in-house expert, as expressed during the 2010 discharge procedure;
je seznanjen s prizadevanji agencije za večjo preglednost, vendar kljub temu ocenjuje, da bi ta pravila lahko veljala za vse strokovnjake v agenciji, kot je bilo izraženo med postopkom razrešnice za leto 2010;
understands that work on this issue is ongoing;
razume, da delo glede te zadeve še poteka;
calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority of the progress made on this matter as soon as possible;
poziva agencijo, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice čim prej seznani z napredkom, doseženim na tem področju;
Notes from the Authority that in 2011 the Internal Audit Service (IAS) of the Commission carried out an assurance audit of operational planning and budgeting, while the Internal Audit unit (IA) carried out three assurance audits, namely the process of selection of panel members, a special review of expert contributions to scientific opinions (post conflict of interest), as well as an interim review of the cost claimed in relation to the final seat of the Authority;
na podlagi odgovorov agencije ugotavlja, da je leta 2011 služba Evropske komisije za notranjo revizijo izvedla revizijsko zagotovilo operativnega načrtovanja in oblikovanja proračuna, medtem ko je služba za notranjo revizijo izvedla tri revizijska zagotovila, in sicer postopek izbora članov sveta, posebno revizijo prispevkov strokovnjakov k strokovnim mnenjem (po navzkrižju interesov) kot tudi vmesni pregled stroškov, ki so bili zahtevani za stalni sedež agencije;
Notes with satisfaction that out of 11 recommendations (none ‘critical’, two ‘very important’, seven ‘important’ and two ‘desirable’) made by the IAS audit, all have been accepted by management and five out of six outstanding ‘very important’ recommendations have been implemented and await follow-up by IAS, and implementation of the remaining one is in progress;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je od 11 priporočil (nobeno „kritično“, dve „zelo pomembni“, sedem „pomembnih“ in dve „zaželeni“), ki jih je podala služba Evropske komisije za notranjo revizijo, vodstvo sprejelo vse, pet od šestih priporočil z oznako „zelo pomembno“ je bilo izvedenih in čakajo na spremljanje službe Evropske komisije za notranjo revizijo, izvajanje zadnjega pa poteka;
also notes that the IA had made one very important and two important recommendations, and among its 11 outstanding very important recommendations five are implemented and six are in progress;
ugotavlja tudi, da je služba za notranjo revizijo podala eno zelo pomembno in dve pomembni priporočili in da je od 11 zelo pomembnih priporočil pet izvedenih, šest pa se jih še vedno izvaja;
notes that no critical recommendations remain open;
ugotavlja, da ni nobenega kritičnega priporočila;
OJ L 350, 20.12.2012, p. 77.
UL L 350, 20.12.2012, str. 77.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (‘the Financial Regulation’), and in particular Article 185 thereof, having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] establishing a European Food Safety Authority, and in particular Article 44 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Article 94 thereof,having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], zlasti člena 185 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane, zlasti člena 44 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], zlasti člena 94 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju člena 77 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
on the closure of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2011
o zaključku poslovnih knjig Evropske agencije za varnost hrane za proračunsko leto 2011
Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2011;
odobri zaključek poslovnih knjig Evropske agencije za varnost hrane za proračunsko leto 2011;
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2011
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov za proračunsko leto 2011
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2011,
ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov za proračunsko leto 2011,
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2011, together with the Institute’s replies [1],having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 12 February 2013 (05753/2013 – C7-0041/2013),
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov za proračunsko leto 2011, skupaj z odgovori inštituta [1],ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 12. februarja 2013 (05753/2013 – C7-0041/2013),
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2], and in particular Article 185 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [3], and in particular Article 208 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1922/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing a European Institute for Gender Equality [4], and in particular Article 14 thereof,having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Article 94 thereof,having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2], zlasti člena 185 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [3], zlasti člena 208 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1922/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov [4], zlasti člena 14 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], zlasti člena 94 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju člena 77 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (A7-0081/2013),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov (A7-0081/2013),
Grants the Director of the European Institute for Gender Equality discharge in respect of the implementation of the Institute’s budget for the financial year 2011;
podeli razrešnico direktorici Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov glede izvrševanja proračuna inštituta za proračunsko leto 2011;
Instructs its President to forward this Decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the Director of the European Institute for Gender Equality, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in resolucijo, ki je del sklepa, posreduje direktorici Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
OJ C 388, 15.12.2012, p. 98.
UL C 388, 15.12.2012, str. 98.
with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2011
s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega inštituta za enakost spolov za proračunsko leto 2011