natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The objective of the 2007 Extension decision was to include the newly submitted information and to comprehensively address all potential distortions of competition which resulted from the public measures that were granted to Deutsche Post (see Section I.1.14 for more details on the public transfers, the public guarantees, the pension subsidies, and the exclusive right for the provision of letter services).
Cilj odločbe o razširitvi iz leta 2007 je bila vključitev novo predloženih informacij in skrbna preiskava vseh morebitnih izkrivljanj konkurence, nastalih zaradi javnih ukrepov, ki so bili odobreni podjetju Deutsche Post (za podrobnejše informacije o državnih nadomestilih, državnih jamstvih, subvencijah za pokojnine in izključni pravici do zagotavljanja storitev dostave pisemskih pošiljk glej oddelek I.1.14).
The Commission sent an information request to Germany on 17 July 2008 on all public measures under investigation including a questionnaire on revenues and costs of Deutsche Post for the period 1990-2007.
Komisija je Nemčiji 17. julija 2008 poslala zahtevo za informacije glede vseh ukrepov državne pomoči, ki se preiskujejo, vključno z vprašalnikom o prihodkih in stroških podjetja Deutsche Post v obdobju 1990–2007.
The information request was prepared in cooperation with WIK Consult.
Zahtevo za informacije je Komisija pripravila skupaj s podjetjem WIK Consult.
In its submission of 14 August 2008, Germany maintained that there was no reason for examining the revenues and losses of Deutsche Post for the period after 1994.
V svojem sporočilu z dne 14. avgusta 2008 je Nemčija trdila, da ni razloga za preverjanje prihodkov in izgub podjetja Deutsche Post za obdobje po letu 1994.
On 22 August 2008, the Commission reserved the right to adopt an information injunction pursuant to Article 10(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [10] if Germany did not provide the requested information.
Komisija si je 22. avgusta 2008 pridržala pravico do sprejetja odredbe o predložitvi podatkov v skladu s členom 10(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [10], če Nemčija ne bi predložila zahtevanih informacij.
The Commission did not accept Germany's arguments and insisted that an analysis until 2007 was necessary to fully appreciate the competitive effects of the granted public measures.
Komisija ni sprejela trditev Nemčije in je vztrajala, da je bila analiza do leta 2007 potrebna zaradi celovitega razumevanja konkurenčnih učinkov odobrenih ukrepov državne pomoči.
Following the two reminders for information of 12 August 2008 and 22 August 2008, the Commission issued an information injunction on 30 October 2008 to enjoin Germany to deliver all necessary accounting information for the whole period 1990-2007.
Po dveh opomnikih glede predložitve podatkov z dne 12. in 22. avgusta 2008 je Komisija 30. oktobra 2008 sprejela odredbo o predložitvi podatkov, v kateri je Nemčiji odredila, da predloži vse potrebne računovodske podatke za celotno obdobje 1990–2007.
On 27 November 2008, Germany submitted the requested accounting information for the period 1990-1994.
Zahtevane računovodske podatke za obdobje 1990–1994 je Nemčija predložila 27. novembra 2008.
On 5 and 16 December 2008, Germany updated the accounting information which had been submitted on 27 November 2008.
Nemčija je računovodske podatke, ki jih je predložila 27. novembra 2008, posodobila 5. in 16. decembra 2008.
On 4 October 2011, UPS submitted its comments.
Podjetje UPS je svoje pripombe predložilo 4. oktobra 2011.
They were followed by comments submitted by Free and Fair Postal Postal Initiative (hereafter referred to as FFIP) on 5 October 2011 and comments submitted by Bundesverband Internationaler Express und Kurierdienste (hereafter referred to as BIEK) on 7 October 2011.
Nato sta svoje pripombe predložila še organizacija Free and Fair Postal Initiative (v nadaljnjem besedilu: organizacija FFPI) 5. oktobra 2011 in združenje Bundesverband Internationaler Express und Kurierdienste (v nadaljnjem besedilu: združenje BIEK) 7. oktobra 2011.
On 13 October 2011, the Commission communicated the comments by interested parties to Germany.
Komisija je 13. oktobra 2011 pripombe zainteresiranih strani posredovala Nemčiji.
On 18 November 2011, the Commission sent a further information request concerning details of the pension financing for the period after 2007.
Komisija je 18. novembra 2011 poslala še eno zahtevo za informacije v zvezi s podrobnostmi financiranja pokojnin v obdobju po letu 2007.
On 2 January 2012 and 19 January 2012, Germany submitted replies.
Nemčija je odgovore predložila 2. in 19. januarja 2012.
On 16 December 2011, the Commission submitted to Germany an expert study by Charles River Associates concerning profit benchmarking [18] (hereinafter CRA study) for comments to which Germany replied on 16 January 2012.
Komisija je 16. decembra 2011 Nemčiji predložila strokovno študijo svetovalnega podjetja Charles River Associates o opredelitvi referenčnega dobička [18] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: študija podjetja CRA), na katero je Nemčija predložila pripombe 16. januarja 2012.
Based on UPS' 1994 complaint, the Commission found that Deutsche Post infringed Article 102 TFEU by predatory pricing for Business-to-Consumer parcels in the period 1990-1995.
Na podlagi pritožbe podjetja UPS iz leta 1994 je Komisija ugotovila, da je podjetje Deutsche Post s plenilskimi cenami dostave paketov od podjetij do potrošnikov v obdobju 1990–1995 kršilo člen 102 PDEU.
A fine of EUR 24 million was imposed on Deutsche Post [19].
Podjetju Deutsche Post je bila naložena kazen v višini 24 milijonov EUR [19].
With the second postal reform of 1994, civil servants who had worked for POSTDIENST were, pursuant to Article 2(1) PostPersRG 1994, transferred to DPAG.
Z drugo reformo poštnega sektorja iz leta 1994 so bili javni uslužbenci, ki so delali za podjetje Postdienst, v skladu s členom 2(1) zakona PostPersRG iz leta 1994 premeščeni v podjetje DPAG.
Thereby, the civil servants kept, pursuant to Article 2(3) PostPersRG 1994, their existing legal status.
V skladu s členom 2(3) zakona PostPersRG iz leta 1994 so javni uslužbenci ohranili svoj obstoječi pravni status.
While the general requirement for prices of universal services is affordability, DPAG had to charge uniform prices in respect of letter services performed under the exclusive license that eventually expired in 2007.
ker je splošna zahteva glede cen univerzalnih storitev cenovna dostopnost, je moralo podjetje DPAG zaračunavati enotne cene za storitve dostave pisemskih pošiljk, ki jih je opravljalo na podlagi izključne pravice, ki je prenehala v letu 2007.
However, DPAG has some degree of pricing flexibility for the reserved services because it could conclude individual price agreements with customers mailing at least 50 items per transaction.
Vendar je podjetje DPAG do določene stopnje cenovno prilagodljivo pri rezerviranih storitvah, saj lahko s strankami, ki pošljejo vsaj 50 enot na transakcijo, sklene individualno pogodbo glede cene.
However, Article 7 PostUmwG 1994 waived the right of Telekom AG (arising from Paragraph 2(2) PostUmwG 1994) to bring claims against DPAG up to the amount of losses accrued by POSTDIENST until 31 December 1994.
Vendar pa je v skladu s členom 7 zakona PostUmwG iz leta 1994 pravica družbe Telekom AG (iz člena 2(2) zakona PostUmwG iz leta 1994), da od podjetja DPAG terja dolgove v višini izgub, ki jih je ustvarilo podjetje Postdienst, prenehala 31. decembra 1994.
It resulted in a transfer of assets in the value of EUR 2822 million from Telekom AG to DPAG.
Zato je prišlo do prenosa sredstev v višini 2,822 milijarde EUR z družbe Telekom AG na podjetje DPAG.
For the 2002 price cap decision, Deutsche Post submitted accounts to the Postal regulator (hereafter 2002 regulatory accounts) for the first time that covered the period 1998-2006.
Za namene sklepa o najvišjih cenah iz leta 2002 je podjetje Deutsche Post poštnemu regulatorju prvič predložilo regulativne izkaze prihodkov in stroškov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: regulativni izkazi iz leta 2002), ki so zajemali obdobje 1998–2006.
The regulatory accounts were based on realised results up to 2001 and on projections for the later years.
Regulativni izkazi so temeljili na rezultatih do leta 2001 in napovedih za prihodnja leta.
The Commission will refer throughout this Decision to ‘price-regulated services’ when dealing with those services for which Deutsche Post holds a dominant position and which are subject to either ex-ante price control pursuant to Article 19 PostG 1997 or ex-post price control pursuant to Article 25 PostG 1997.
Komisija bo v tem sklepu navajala „cenovno regulirane storitve“, s čimer poimenuje storitve, pri katerih ima podjetje Deutsche Post prevladujoč položaj in za katere velja predhodni nadzor cen v skladu s členom 19 zakona PostG iz leta 1997 ali naknadni nadzor cen v skladu s členom 25 zakona PostG iz leta 1997.
All other services for which Deutsche Post does not hold a dominant position and which are not subject to price control will be referred to as ‘non-price regulated services’.
Vse druge storitve, pri katerih podjetje Deutsche Post nima prevladujočega položaja in ki niso predmet nadzora cen, bodo opredeljene kot „storitve, ki niso cenovno regulirane“.
The financial results of DPAG for the years 1995 to 2006 are shown in Figure 2 of the 2007 Extension Decision.
Finančni rezultati podjetja DPAG za obdobje 1995–2006 so prikazani na sliki 2 sklepa o razširitvi iz leta 2007.
Whereas they were mixed, some years with losses and some with profits, in the years 1995 to 1999, DPAG constantly made profits of between EUR 1 and 2 billion before taxes for the years 2000 until 2006.
Rezultati v obdobju 1995–1999 so bili različni (nekatera leta so kazala izgubo, druga pa dobiček), vendar pa je podjetje DPAG v obdobju 2000–2006 vsako leto ustvarilo dobiček pred obdavčitvijo v višini od 1 do 2 milijard EUR.
In particular, the Commission considered it necessary to review, in line with the principles codified in the 2005 Framework, the cost allocation between the universal and commercial services.
Komisija je zlasti menila, da je treba v skladu z načeli iz Okvira iz leta 2005 preveriti razdelitev stroškov med univerzalne in komercialne storitve.
It also raised doubts with regards to the determination of a reasonable profit, taking into account the average profitability of the sector and Deutsche Post's risk position.
Izrazila je tudi pomisleke glede določitve zmernega dobička, pri kateri je bilo treba upoštevati povprečno donosnost sektorja in tveganost položaja podjetja Deutsche Post.
The infrastructure burden #3 on the post shop network is calculated differently compared with the calculation in the 2002 regulatory accounts.
Obremenitev št. 3 zaradi infrastrukture (mreža poštnih uradov) je izračunana drugače kot v regulativnih izkazih iz leta 2002.
The burden now shows the alleged cost savings that could have been achieved if all post offices had been run as agencies since 1990.
Obremenitev zdaj zajema predvidene prihranke pri stroških, ki bi jih podjetje lahko imelo, če bi bili vsi poštni uradi od leta 1990 naprej vodeni kot agencije.
Interested parties submitted comments on the 1999 Opening Decision, the 2007 Extension Decision and the 2011 Extension Decision.
Zainteresirane strani so predložile pripombe na odločbo o začetku postopka iz leta 1999, sklep o razširitvi iz leta 2007 in sklep o razširitvi iz leta 2011.
The most important comments on all three decisions are summarised in this section.
Najpomembnejše pripombe na odločbo in oba sklepa so povzete v tem oddelku.
The Commission observes that this measure has not been addressed in the 1999 Opening Decision, the 2007 Extension Decision or the 2011 Extension Decision.
Komisija je ugotovila, da ta ukrep ni bil obravnavan v odločbi o začetku postopka iz leta 1999, sklepu o razširitvi iz leta 2007 ali sklepu o razširitvi iz leta 2011.
It falls therefore outside the scope of the present Decision.
Zato ne sodi na področje uporabe tega sklepa.
According to UPS, Deutsche Post has benefited from an advantage as it has been partially released from the payment obligation it had to bear before 1995.
Po mnenju podjetja UPS je bila podjetju Deutsche Post dodeljena ugodnost, saj je bilo delno oproščeno plačilne obveznosti, ki jo je imelo pred letom 1995.
Since normal operators have to bear their own pension costs, Deutsche Post was put into an advantageous position compared to its competitors.
Ker morajo običajni operaterji sami kriti svoje stroške pokojnin, je bilo podjetje Deutsche Post v boljšem položaju kot njegovi konkurenti.
Germany is of the opinion that if the pension subsidy were to be considered as State aid it would have to be qualified as existing aid pursuant to Article 1(b)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 because the State has been the sole debtor and the party liable to finance the civil servants' pensions since the entry into force of the relevant provision in the German Basic Law in 1953.
Nemčija meni, da bi bilo treba subvencijo za pokojnine, če bi bila opredeljena kot državna pomoč, obravnavati kot veljavno pomoč v skladu s členom 1(b)(i) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, ker je država edini dolžnik in od začetka veljavnosti ustrezne določbe iz nemške ustave leta 1953 delno odgovorna za financiranje pokojnin javnih uslužbencev.
Germany maintains that neither the first postal reform in 1989 nor the second postal reform in 1995 has changed the State's liability towards the civil servants.
Nemčija meni, da ne prva reforma poštnega sektorja iz leta 1989 ne druga reforma poštnega sektorja iz leta 1995 nista spremenili obveznosti države glede financiranja pokojnin.
After deduction of the reasonable profit, the price-regulated services show a loss of EUR […] million that is higher than the claimed excess social cost for the period 1995-2007.
Po odbitku zmernega dobička kažejo cenovno regulirane storitve izgubo v višini […] milijard EUR, kar je več od navedenih dodatnih stroškov za socialno varnost za obdobje 1995–2007.
The price-regulated revenues have therefore been insufficient to cover the claimed excess social costs.
Cenovno regulirani prihodki tako niso zadoščali za kritje navedenih dodatnih stroškov za socialno varnost.
Up to 1993, Deutsche Post had to pay 10 % of its operational revenue.
Do leta 1993 je moralo podjetje Deutsche Post plačevati 10 % svojih prihodkov iz poslovanja.
As of 1993, the Ablieferungen were successively reduced to 10 % of the operational revenue minus EUR 153 million in 1993.
Od leta 1993 naprej so se povračila postopno nižala, na primer na 10 % prihodkov iz poslovanja minus 153 milijonov EUR v letu 1993.
For 1994, the Ablieferungen amounted to 70 % of the 1993 Ablieferungen.
Za leto 1994 so povračila znašala 70 % povračil v letu 1993.
In 1995, Deutsche Post paid 50 % of the 1993 amount.
V letu 1995 je podjetje Deutsche Post plačalo 50 % zneska iz leta 1993.
In total, Deutsche Post paid EUR 5838 million from 1990 to 1995.
Skupno je podjetje Deutsche Post v obdobju 1990–1995 plačalo 5,838 milijarde EUR.
As Deutsche Bundespost was part of the public administration until the end of 1994, the debt obligations were equal to debts of the State since its creation in 1950.
Ker je bilo podjetje Deutsche Bundespost do konca leta 1994 del javne uprave, so bili dolžniški instrumenti enakovredni državnemu dolgu od ustanovitve podjetja Deutsche Post v letu 1950.
If the public guarantee had provided any advantages to Deutsche Post regarding interest rates they would have to be considered as existing aid.
Če je državno jamstvo podjetju Deutsche Post glede obrestnih mer zagotovilo kakršne koli prednosti, bi jih bilo treba opredeliti kot veljavno pomoč.
Any excess profits after 1995 must not be taken into account because the public transfers were depleted by the net costs of the universal service obligations that Deutsche Post had incurred up to 1995.
Presežnega dobička po letu 1995 se ne sme upoštevati, ker so državna nadomestila izničili neto stroški obveznosti univerzalnih storitev, ki jih je imelo podjetje Deutsche Post do leta 1995.
The Court's annulment of the 2002 Decision also confirms that what had been ‘consumed’ once could not be ‘consumed’ again.
Razveljavitev negativne odločbe iz leta 2002 s strani Sodišča prav tako potrjuje, da tistega, kar je bilo že izničeno, ni mogoče ponovno izničiti.
Germany recalls that Deutsche Post was not legally liable or economically capable to take over civil servants' pension liabilities in 1995.
Nemčija je spomnila, da podjetje Deutsche Post leta 1995 ni bilo zakonsko zavezano ali ekonomsko sposobno plačevati pokojnin javnih uslužbencev.
Consequently, pension costs constitute a debt incurred by the State in line with the Commission's decision in Poste Italiane [66].
Zato stroški za pokojnine pomenijo državni dolg v skladu z odločbo Komisije v zadevi Poste Italiane [66].
Regarding the transfer pricing arrangements between Deutsche Post and DPEED, Germany emphasises that those arrangements follow the requirements of the 2001 Antitrust Decision.
Glede dogovorov o transfernih cenah med podjetjema Deutsche Post in DPEED Nemčija poudarja, da ti dogovori izpolnjujejo zahteve iz protimonopolnega sklepa iz leta 2001.
Deutsche Post sent reports on their fulfilment to the Commission on a regular basis.
Podjetje Deutsche Post je o izpolnjevanju teh zahtev redno poročalo Komisiji.
Germany argues that it already submitted pertaining information with its comments to the 1999 Opening Decision.
Trdi, da je zadevne informacije že predložila s svojimi pripombami na odločbo o začetku postopka iz leta 1999.
As the Commission neither objected to those measures in the 2002 State aid decision nor mentioned them in the 2007 Opening, the capital endowments could not be subject of the current investigation.
Ker Komisija tem ukrepom ni nasprotovala v sklepu o državni pomoči iz leta 2002 ali jih navedla v odločbi o začetku postopka iz leta 2007, kapitalske injekcije ne morejo biti predmet te preiskave.
It argues that the State has been the ultimate debtor and the party liable to finance the civil servants' pensions since the entry into force of the relevant provisions of German Basic Law in 1953.
Trdi, da je bila država končni dolžnik in stran, odgovorna za financiranje pokojnin javnih uslužbencev od začetka veljavnosti zadevnih določb ustave iz leta 1953.
It maintains that the creation of the Pension fund did not change that obligation.
Trdi, da ustanovitev pokojninskega sklada ni vplivala na to obveznost.
Germany claims that, notably with regard to the annual lump-sum payments to the Pension fund of EUR 2045 million in the period 1995 to 1999, Deutsche Post paid social contributions above the compulsory social contributions that competitors had to pay.
Nemčija trdi, da je podjetje Deutsche Post plačevalo prispevke za socialno varnost, višje od prispevkov za socialno varnost, ki so jih morali plačevati konkurenti, zlasti glede na letno pavšalno plačilo za pokojninski sklad v višini 2,045 milijarde EUR v obdobju 1995–1999.
Therefore, for the period up to 1999 but also over the entire period of the investigation, Deutsche Post would have then paid at least the same if not higher contributions than those private companies had to face.
Torej je za obdobje do leta 1999 in v celotnem obdobju preiskave podjetje Deutsche Post plačalo vsaj enake, če ne višje prispevke kot zasebna podjetja.
As the German legislator appeared to consider that the current level of regulated prices fulfilled the requirements of PostG 1997, he decided that the prices were to be kept at the existing level of 1997 until 1999.
Ker je po mnenju nemškega zakonodajalca takratna raven reguliranih cen izpolnjevala zahteve zakona PostG iz leta 1997, se je odločil, da se bodo cene na ravni iz leta 1997 ohranile do leta 1999.
The Minister of Economics and Technology later decided as well on 27 March 2000 that the prices which were approved on 1 September 1997 should remain in force until 31 December 2002.
Minister za ekonomijo in tehnologijo je nato 27. marca 2000 odločil, da bodo cene, odobrene 1. septembra 1997, ostale veljavne do 31. decembra 2002.
Notwithstanding the above, the Commission has to admit that in this case there is insufficient evidence for it to quantify exactly the level of wage-based social security contributions that Deutsche Post paid in the years 1995 to 2002.
Ne glede na navedeno Komisija priznava, da v tem primeru ni dovolj dokazov, da bi lahko določili natančno višino prispevkov za socialno varnost na podlagi plač, ki jih je podjetje Deutsche Post plačevalo v obdobju 1995–2002.
It considers that such a quantification could not properly based on ex-post de facto findings that a certain proportion of social costs from non-price regulated services was shifted to be financed out of price regulated revenues and that Deutsche Post was not disadvantaged in overall terms under the pension fund arrangements because the price regulated revenues were de facto set at a level which was sufficient to cover its contributions to the pension fund including the shifted burdens.
Meni, da takšna ocena ne more pravilno temeljiti na naknadnih ugotovitvah, da je bil določen del stroškov za socialno varnost pri storitvah, ki niso cenovno regulirane, prenesen zaradi financiranja iz cenovno reguliranih prihodkov, in da podjetje Deutsche Post na splošno ni bilo v slabšem položaju zaradi dogovora glede pokojninskega sklada, ker so bili cenovno regulirani prihodki dejansko določeni na ravni, ki je zadoščala za kritje njegovih prispevkov za pokojninski sklad, vključno s prenesenimi obremenitvami.
By contrast, for the period since 1 January 2003, it can be clearly established from the 2002, 2007 and 2011 Price cap decisions how the Postal regulator set the composition of the regulated prices.
Nasprotno pa je za obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 mogoče na podlagi sklepov o najvišjih cenah iz let 2002, 2007 in 2011 natančno ugotoviti, kako je poštni regulator določil sestavo reguliranih cen.
It is certain that they were unambiguously set at a higher level to cover the burdens of the non-price regulated services out of the price-regulated revenues.
Gotovo je, da so bile nedvomno določene na višji ravni, da bi se obremenitve iz storitev, ki niso cenovno regulirane, krile iz cenovno reguliranih prihodkov.
That method was applied by the Postal regulator for the first time in the 2002 price cap decision The Postal regulator also approved the burden on excess social contribution in the 2007 and 2011 Price cap decisions.
To metodo je poštni regulator prvič uporabil v sklepu o najvišjih cenah iz leta 2002. Poštni regulator je obremenitev zaradi dodatnih prispevkov za socialno varnost odobril tudi v sklepih o najvišjih cenah iz let 2007 in 2011.
The fact that only a share of the price-regulated services is subject to ex-ante price control does not alter the Commission's assessment.
Dejstvo, da se naknadni nadzor cen izvaja samo za del cenovno reguliranih storitev, ne spremeni ocene Komisije.
It was entrusted by § 52 PostG 1997 until that date with the universal service obligation foreseen in Chapter 2 of Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [90] and § 11 PostG 1997.
Do zadevnega datuma je bila podjetju s členom 52 zakona PostG iz leta 1997 naložena obveznost univerzalnih storitev, določena v poglavju 2 Direktive 97/67/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [90] in členu 11 zakona PostG iz leta 1997.
It has since 1 January 2008 continued to assume the universal service obligation on a voluntary basis.
Od 1. januarja 2008 podjetje univerzalne storitve zagotavlja prostovoljno.