natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, one party claimed that deficiencies in the reply of the analogue country producer should disqualify Brazil as an analogue country and the investigation should be terminated since the Commission cannot establish the normal value.
Zlasti ena stranka je trdila, da bi bilo treba zaradi pomanjkljivosti v odgovoru proizvajalca iz primerljive države Brazilijo izločiti kot primerljivo državo in da bi bilo treba preiskavo zaustaviti, ker Komisija ne more določiti normalne vrednosti.
In this respect it is noted that in the current investigation the Commission did have all the necessary information to perform a dumping calculation.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija v sedanji preiskavi imela na voljo vse potrebne podatke za izračun dampinga.
Consequently, the claims concerning the suitability of Brazil as an analogue country could not be accepted.
Zato navedb o primernosti Brazilije kot primerljive države ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
With regard to the claims for adjustments, it is noted that the level of trade differences between the Brazilian producer and the Chinese exporting producer has been accounted for by means of a level of trade adjustment (see recital 59 below).
Glede zahteve za prilagoditev je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile razlike v ravni trgovanja med brazilskim proizvajalcem in kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom upoštevane s pomočjo prilagoditve ravni trgovanja (glej uvodno izjavo 59).
Finally, one party claimed that an adjustment should be made to account for an allegedly distorting effect of the 14 % import duty in the analogue country.
Nazadnje je ena stranka trdila, da bi bilo treba uvesti prilagoditev, ki bi upoštevala domnevno izkrivljajoč učinek, ki ga ima uvozna dajatev v višini 14 % v primerljivi državi.
This claim cannot be accepted as no link can be established between an import duty as such and the price level on the domestic market.
Te trditve ni mogoče sprejeti, saj ni mogoče vzpostaviti povezave med uvozno dajatvijo kot tako in ravnijo cen na domačem trgu.
Consequently, Brazil is considered an appropriate analogue country since there is sufficient competition with at least two producers and a significant level of imports.
V skladu s tem se Brazilija šteje kot ustrezna primerljiva država, saj obstaja zadostna konkurenca z vsaj dvema proizvajalcema in znatno ravnijo uvoza.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether Paletrans’ domestic sales of the like product to independent customers were representative.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej proučila, ali je bila prodaja podobnega izdelka podjetja Paletrans neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna.
In this respect, it was found that the total volume of such sales was equal to at least 5 % of the total volume of Noblelift’s export sales to the Union.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil celoten obseg takšne prodaje najmanj 5 % celotnega izvoza Noblelift v Unijo.
The Commission subsequently examined whether there are types of the like product sold domestically by Paletrans that were sufficiently comparable in terms of functions and materials used to the types sold by Noblelift for export to the Union.
Komisija je naknadno preverila, ali podjetje Paletrans na domačem trgu prodaja podobne vrste izdelkov, ki so vidika vgrajenih funkcij in materialov v zadostni meri primerljivi z vrstami izdelkov, ki jih Noblelift izvaža v Unijo.
The investigation established that a number of types sold domestically by Paletrans were sufficiently comparable with the types exported by Noblelift to the Union.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so številne vrste izdelkov, ki jih Paletrans prodaja na domačem trgu, v zadostni meri primerljive z vrstami izdelka, ki jih Noblelift izvaža v Unijo.
The Commission subsequently examined for the analogue country producer whether each comparable type of the like product sold domestically could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade.
Komisija je nato za proizvajalca iz primerljive države proučila, ali se lahko za vsako vrsto primerljivega izdelka, ki se prodaja na domačem trgu, šteje, da se prodaja v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
This was done by establishing for each product type the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the RIP.
Pri tem je bil za vsako vrsto izdelka opredeljen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OPP.
This was the case for all comparable types and the normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of each comparable type made during the RIP.
To je veljalo za vse primerljive vrste izdelkov, normalna vrednost pa je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen vse domače prodaje za vsako primerljivo vrsto izdelkov v OPP.
For non-comparable types the normal value could be constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation by adding to the manufacturing cost, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable percentage for domestic selling, general and administrative expenses and a reasonable margin for domestic profit.
Za vrste izdelkov, ki niso primerljivi, bi se lahko normalna vrednost oblikovala v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, in sicer tako, da se proizvodnim stroškom, ki so po potrebi prilagojeni, prišteje ustrezen odstotek za domačo prodajo, splošne in upravne stroške ter primerno stopnjo dobička na domačem trgu.
The selling, general and administrative expenses and the profit were based on actual data pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, for the like product, by the producer in the analogue country.
Podatki o prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroških ter podatki o dobičku temeljijo na dejanskih podatkih proizvajalca v primerljivi državi iz njegove proizvodnje in prodaje v običajnem poteku trgovine podobnega izdelka.
It should be noted that the price constructed on that basis was subject to the adjustments described in recital 59, in particular to take account of the difference in level of trade between export sales by Noblelift and the domestic sales of the analogue country producer.
Treba je opozoriti, da so cene, ki so bile oblikovane na tak način, predmet prilagoditev opisanih v uvodni izjavi 59, zlasti z namenom upoštevanja razlik v ravni trgovanja med izvozom Noblelift in prodaje proizvajalca iz primerljive države na domačem trgu.
The sole cooperating exporting producer claimed that the Commission performed dumping calculations on the basis of ‘truncated PCNs’ and that no explanations were provided concerning the parameters used for conducting the comparison.
Edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je Komisija izračune dampinga izvedla na podlagi „okrnjenih kontrolnih številk izdelkov“ ter da pojasnila o parametrih, ki so bili uporabljeni za izvedbo primerjave, niso bila podana.
According to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation the dumping margin is normally established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average of prices of all export transactions subject to the relevant provisions governing fair comparison.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe se stopnja dampinga običajno določi na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti in tehtanega povprečja cen vseh izvoznih transakcij, ob upoštevanju zadevnih določb o pošteni primerjavi.
With regard to the fair comparison, it has to be noted that the product control number is a tool used in the investigation in order to structure and organise the substantial amounts of very detailed data submitted by the companies.
V zvezi s pošteno primerjavo je treba opozoriti, da je kontrolna številka izdelka orodje, s katerim se v preiskavi strukturirajo in organizirajo velike količine zelo podrobnih podatkov, ki so jih predložile družbe.
It is an aid to conduct a more detailed analysis of different product characteristics within the category of the product concerned and the like product.
Je pripomoček za izvedbo podrobnejše analize različnih značilnosti izdelka v kategoriji zadevnega izdelka in podobnega izdelka.
The Commission has collected information in relation to a number of parameters (chassis material, chassis painted, lift capacity, type of hydraulic system, working length, fork, width over forks, steering wheel material, load wheel material, load wheel type, brake type) but in order to take into consideration all export transactions it was considered reasonable and it was found possible to base the comparison in this case on certain of those parameters that constitute the most pertinent characteristics (chassis material, chassis painted, steering wheel material, load wheel material, load wheel type).
Komisija je zbrala podatke v zvezi z različnimi parametri (material šasije, barve šasije, dvižne zmogljivosti, vrsta hidravličnega sistema, delovna dolžino, vilice, širina vilic, material kolesa za krmiljenje, material kolesa za obremenitev, tip kolesa za obremenitev, tip zavor), vendar se je zdelo smiselno in izkazalo za možno, da se zaradi upoštevanja vseh izvoznih transakcij primerjava v tem primeru omeji na nekatere od teh parametrov, ki sestavljajo najbolj bistvene značilnosti (material šasije, barve šasije, material kolesa za krmiljenje, material kolesa za obremenitev, tip kolesa za obremenitev, tip zavor).
Therefore, the comparison was based on the most pertinent characteristics in order to increase the matching and to ensure a fair comparison.
Zato je primerjava temeljila na najbolj bistvenih značilnostih, da bi se povečalo ujemanje in zagotovila poštena primerjava.
It has to be stressed that the Commission did not disregard any information.
Poudariti je treba, da je Komisija upoštevala vse informacije.
However, it is not uncommon that certain parameters used in the product control number have a lesser weight and that specific parameters more than others form a better basis for fair comparison.
Vendar ni neobičajno, da imajo nekateri parametri, uporabljeni v kontrolni številki izdelka, manjšo težo in da nekateri parametri bolj kot drugi tvorijo boljšo osnovo za pošteno primerjavo.
No products have been disregarded from the comparison on the basis of physical differences or for any other reasons, nor have any new product types been created.
Pri primerjavi ni bil zanemarjen noben izdelek zaradi fizikalnih razlik ali drugih razlogov, niti niso bile ustvarjene nobene nove vrste izdelkov.
On the contrary, all sales were included in the comparison.
Nasprotno, v primerjavo je bila vključena celotna prodaja.
While it was acknowledged that other parameters had some impact on prices, it was found more appropriate that the calculations should be based on the five most relevant parameters as this led to the highest level of matching.
Medtem ko je priznano, da so drugi parametri do neke mere vplivali na cene, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je primerneje, če izračuni temeljijo na petih najpomembnejših parametrih, saj to privede do najvišje stopnje ujemanja.
As far as procedural aspects of the comparison are concerned, it has to be noted that the exporting producer was provided with full opportunity to comment on the calculations performed in this case.
Kar zadeva postopkovni vidik primerjave, je treba opozoriti, da je imel proizvajalec izvoznik na voljo vse možnosti podati pripombe na izračune, izvedene v tem primeru.
Full details of the calculations have been disclosed and redisclosed.
Vse podrobnosti izračunov so bile razkrite in ponovno razkrite.
Consequently, the foregoing claims had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba te zahteve zavrniti.
All export sales to the Union of the Chinese exporting producer were made directly to independent customers in the Union.
Ves izvoz, ki ga je izvedel kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik v Unijo, je bil prodan neposredno neodvisnim kupcem v Uniji.
Therefore, the export price was established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
One party claimed that the export sales of chassis and hydraulics should have been included in the calculation.
Ena stranka je trdila, da bi moral biti izvoz šasij in hidravlik vključen v izračun.
That claim has been accepted.
Ta trditev je bila sprejeta.
The comparison between the weighted average normal value and the weighted average export price was made on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade.
Primerjava tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno je bila izvedena na podlagi cene franko tovarna in na enaki ravni trgovanja.
For this purpose, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made, where applicable and justified, for differences in level of trade (estimated price difference for sales to different type of customers in the domestic market of the analogue country), transport (comprising inland freight cost in the exporting country and ocean freight for transportation to the Union), insurance (ocean insurance cost), handling, loading and ancillary costs, commissions (paid for export sales), bank charges (paid for export sales), credit costs (based on the agreed payment terms and the prevailing interest rate) and packing costs (cost of packing materials used).
V ta namen so bile izvedene določene olajšave v obliki ustreznih prilagoditev, kjer je bilo to potrebno in upravičeno, za razlike v ravni trgovanja (ocenjena razlika v ceni za prodajo različnim vrstam strank na domačem trgu primerljive države), prevoz (ki vključuje notranje prevozne stroške v državi izvoznici in stroške čezmorskega prevoza v Unijo), zavarovanje (stroški zavarovanja za čezmorski prevoz), manipulativni stroški, stroški natovarjanja in dodatni stroški, provizije (ki se plačujejo za izvoz), bančni stroški (ki se plačujejo za izvoz), stroški kreditiranja (ki temeljijo na podlagi dogovorjenih plačilnih pogojev in prevladujoče obrestne mere) in stroški pakiranja (stroški za materiale, ki se uporablja za embalažo).
Following a claim from the sole cooperating exporting producer, an adjustment for the differences in thickness of steel used by the producer in the analogue country and the exporting producer in the country concerned was made to the normal value, as it was found reasonable.
Po zahtevi, ki jo je vložil edini sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, je bila izvedena prilagoditev normalne vrednosti zaradi razlike v debelini jekla, ki ga uporabljata proizvajalec v primerljivi državi in proizvajalec izvoznik iz zadevne države, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da je zahteva utemeljena.
The adjustment was based on the difference in thickness in proportion to the contribution of steel to the price of the like product sold in Brazil by the analogue country producer.
Prilagoditev je temeljila na razliki v debelini, sorazmerno s prispevkom jekla k ceni podobnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajalec iz primerljive države prodaja v Braziliji.
This led to a change in the dumping margin (see recital 73 below).
To je privedlo do spremembe stopnje dampinga (glej uvodno izjavo 73).
Following an additional disclosure (inviting comments on the steel thickness adjustment), one party contested that adjustment as lacking factual basis.
Po dodatnem razkritju (s pozivom po predložitvi pripomb na izvedeno prilagoditev, povezano z debelino jekla) je ena stranka ugovarjala, da prilagoditev nima dejanske podlage.
It also pointed out that the exporting producer’s non-confidential submissions seeking the adjustment were deficient thereby violating other parties’ rights of defence.
Poudarila je tudi, da je nezaupna vloga, s katero je proizvajalec izvoznik poskušal doseči prilagoditev, nepopolna, s čimer krši pravice drugih strank do obrambe.
The Commission verified the data on file on which the steel thickness adjustment was based and confirmed that it was warranted.
Komisija je preverila podatke v dokumentaciji, na kateri temelji prilagoditev zaradi debeline jekla, in je potrdila, da je ta upravičena.
The sole cooperating exporter presented claims for several other adjustments due to differences in efficiency and productivity, claiming, inter alia, that the producer in the analogue country was less productive (has a lower output per worker) and had higher consumption of raw materials per unit.
Edini sodelujoči izvoznik je vložil zahteve za številne druge prilagoditve zaradi razlik v učinkovitosti in produktivnosti, v katerih je med drugim trdil, da je proizvajalec v primerljivi državi manj produktiven (ima manjši izkoristek na delavca) in ima večjo porabo surovin na enoto.
It has to be noted at the outset that while differences in efficiency or productivity might exist between companies, the guiding principle is to ensure comparability between export prices and normal value, which does not require that the circumstances of an analogue country producer and an exporting producer in a non-market economy country are completely aligned.
Za začetek je treba poudariti, da je kljub razlikam v učinkovitosti ali produktivnosti, ki morda obstajajo med podjetji, vodilno načelo zagotovitev primerljivosti med izvoznimi cenami in normalno vrednostjo, pri čemer pa ni nujno, da so okoliščine med proizvajalcem iz primerljive države in proizvajalcem izvoznikom v državi brez tržnega gospodarstva popolnoma enake.
Indeed, only differences for factors affecting prices and price comparability between an analogue country producer and an exporting producer in a non-market economy country warrant an adjustment.
Pravzaprav so opravičljiv razlog za prilagoditev lahko samo razlike v dejavnikih, ki vplivajo na cene in na primerljivost med proizvajalcem iz primerljive države in proizvajalcem izvoznikom v državi brez tržnega gospodarstva.
Nevertheless, it has to be pointed out that the investigation did not reveal any circumstances which would suggest that the producer in the analogue country did not have a reasonably efficient production process.
Ne glede na to pa je treba poudariti, da preiskava ni razkrila nobenih okoliščin, ki bi nakazovale, da proizvajalec v primerljivi državi ni imel ustrezno učinkovitega proizvodnega postopka.
Indeed, a lower use of labour is often the result of a higher level of automation, which in turn leads to higher costs in other areas (depreciation, capital, financing, manufacturing overheads).
Dejansko je manjša uporaba delovne sile pogosto posledica višje stopnje avtomatizacije, kar pa vodi v višje stroške na drugih področjih (amortizacija, kapital, financiranje, režijski stroški proizvodnje).
Only a comprehensive analysis could reveal all differences in cost factors and demonstrate whether prices and price comparability are affected, thereby justifying an adjustment.
Samo celovita analiza bi lahko razkrila vse razlike v stroškovnih dejavnikih in pokazala, če ti vplivajo na cene in njihovo primerljivost, kar bi utemeljevalo prilagoditev.
The claims cannot therefore be accepted.
Zahteva zato ne more biti sprejeta.
In addition to the foregoing, the claims for adjustment for a per-unit energy difference and for a per-unit depreciation and manufacturing overheads difference were unsubstantiated.
Poleg navedenega so zahteve za izvedbo prilagoditve zaradi razlike med porabo energije na enoto, razlik v amortizaciji na enoto in razlik med režijskimi stroški proizvodnje neutemeljene.
In particular, in relation to energy efficiency it was not explained what elements in the production process make the Brazilian producer inefficient as compared to the sole cooperating exporting producer.
Zlasti v zvezi z energetsko učinkovitostjo ni pojasnjeno, kateri so tisti elementi v proizvodnem procesu, zaradi katerih naj bi bil brazilski proizvajalec v primerjavi z edinim sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom neučinkovit.
The amount of the adjustment was based on a ratio of labour cost difference per unit (based on productivity difference) related to the share of labour cost in total cost.
Znesek prilagoditve je bil določen z razliko v razmerju med stroškom dela na enoto (ki temelji na razliki v produktivnosti) in deležem stroškov dela v skupnih stroških.
The link between such ratio and energy efficiency and depreciation and manufacturing overheads difference had not been explained and was not understandable.
Povezava med takšnim razmerjem, energetsko učinkovitostjo, amortizacijo in splošnimi proizvodnimi stroški ni bila pojasnjena in ni razumljiva.
The claims are thus rejected.
Trditve se zato zavrnejo.
One party also claimed that adjustments should be made for parameters, inter alia, such as lift capacity and fork.
Ena stranka je trdila, da bi bilo treba izvesti prilagoditve tudi na podlagi drugih parametrov, kot so dvižna zmogljivost in vilice.
In this respect, reference is made to comments concerning the parameters of comparison (see recital 50 above) where it is noted that a comparison is based on the most relevant parameters to ensure the highest level of matching.
V povezavi s tem se sklicuje na pripombe v zvezi s parametri za primerjavo (glej uvodno izjavo 50), v katerih je navedeno, da primerjava temelji na najpomembnejših parametrih za zagotovitev najvišje stopnje ujemanja.
In any case the claims were not substantiated.
V nobenem primeru pa ta trditev ni utemeljena.
Another claim was that adjustment should be made due to the fact that the exporting producer uses patented technology.
V drugi zahtevi je bilo navedeno, da bilo treba prilagoditev izvesti zaradi dejstva, da proizvajalec izvoznik uporablja patentirano tehnologijo.
This claim has not been further substantiated.
Ta zahteva ni bila utemeljena.
Notably, the exporting producer failed to quantify the adjustment.
Proizvajalec izvoznik prilagoditve ni količinsko opredelil.
The only piece of information provided was a document which was stated to be the patent.
Edina informacija, ki jo je predložil, je bil dokument, za katerega je trdil, da predstavlja patent.
In a later submission the adjustment was partially quantified but without any supporting evidence.
V dopolnilni vlogi je bila prilagoditev delno količinsko opredeljena, vendar ni bila podprta z dokazi.
Therefore, the claim could not be accepted.
Zato te zahteve ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
Furthermore, the claim for adjustment for difference in efficiency in use of raw materials has been covered by the adjustment for thickness of steel (see recital 60 above), as the use of different steel thickness might lead to a lower overall consumption of steel.
Zahteva za prilagoditev zaradi razlike v učinkovitosti pri uporabi surovin je bila zajeta že v prilagoditvi zaradi debeline jekla (glej uvodno izjavo 60), saj lahko uporaba različnih debelin jekla privede do manjše skupne porabe jekla.
Finally, the exporting producer stated that it sold via a sales channel, in particular non-branded products on an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) basis, different from that of the producer in the analogue country.
Nazadnje je proizvajalec izvoznik navedel, da je njegova prodaja potekala po prodajni poti, zlasti za izdelke brez blagovne znamke v okviru proizvajalcev originalne opreme, ki je različna od tiste, po kateri poteka prodaja proizvajalca v primerljivi državi.
Accordingly, a claim for an adjustment reflecting this difference was put forward.
Zato je vložil zahtevo za prilagoditev, ki odraža to razliko.
As specified above (recital 59), a level of trade adjustment was made.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj (v uvodni izjavi 59) je bila prilagoditev ravni trgovanja izvedena.
It was based on an estimated price difference for sales to different types of customers, including OEM sales, in the domestic market of the analogue country.
Temeljila je na oceni razlik v prodajni ceni za različne vrste strank, vključno s prodajo v okviru proizvajalcev originalne opreme, na domačem trgu primerljive države.
For confidentiality reasons the extent of this adjustment could not be disclosed as it would reveal the normal value based on data of the sole analogue country producer.
Obsega te prilagoditve zaradi zaupnosti ni bilo mogoče razkriti, saj bi bila s tem razkrita normalna vrednost, ki temelji na podatkih edinega proizvajalca iz primerljive države.