natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The notification was also discussed between Commission representatives, representatives of Member States’ Competent Authorities for biocidal products, and the applicant in the meeting of the Product Authorisation and Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group of 6-7 December 2011 and in the meeting of the Competent Authorities for Biocidal Products of 29 February to 2 March 2012.
O obvestilu so se posvetovali predstavniki Komisije, predstavniki pristojnih organov za biocidne pripravke držav članic in vlagatelj na srečanju Skupine za poenostavitev medsebojnega priznavanja in izdajo dovoljenj za pripravke, ki je potekalo od 6. do 7. decembra 2011, in na srečanju pristojnih organov za biocidne pripravke, ki je potekalo od 29. februarja do 2. marca 2012.
The applicant has argued that the restriction to use by trained professionals with a license is unjustified and should not be accepted, since its products are also suitable for rodent control by non-trained professionals and non-professionals.
Vlagatelj je trdil, da je omejitev uporabe pripravkov na usposobljene poklicne uporabnike neupravičena in ne bi smela biti sprejeta, saj so njegovi pripravki primerni za nadzor glodavcev, ki ga izvajajo neusposobljeni poklicni uporabniki in nepoklicni uporabniki.
Furthermore, the applicant has put forward the arguments that the products are ready-to-use products; that the active ingredient content in the products is low; that an antidote exists; that the products can easily be kept out of the reach of children and non-target animals; that non-professional users are likely to remove dead rodents; that non-professional users can be trained and that the proposed restriction to use by trained professionals is likely to increases the cost of householder’s insurances in Sweden in the long term.
Poleg tega je vlagatelj predložil utemeljitve, da so pripravki primerni za takojšno uporabo; da je vsebnost aktivne snovi v pripravkih nizka; da obstaja protistrup; da se pripravke zlahka hrani zunaj dosega otrok in neciljnih živali; da nepoklicni uporabniki verjetno odstranijo poginule glodavce; da se nepoklicne uporabnike lahko usposobi in da bo predlagana omejitev uporabe pripravkov na usposobljene poklicne uporabnike verjetno dolgoročno povečala stroške zavarovanj lastnikov stanovanj na Švedskem.
A restriction to professional users should therefore in principle be considered as an appropriate risk mitigation measure.
Omejitev uporabe na poklicne uporabnike bi morala načeloma veljati za ustrezen ukrep za zmanjšanje tveganja.
In the absence of any indication to the contrary, the Commission therefore considers that restriction to professional users is an appropriate and available risk mitigation measure for the authorisation of products containing difethialone in Sweden.
Ker ni dokaza o nasprotnem, Komisija meni, da je omejitev uporabe na poklicne uporabnike primeren in razpoložljiv ukrep za zmanjšanje tveganja pri odobritvi pripravkov, ki vsebujejo difetialon, na Švedskem.
The fact that the United Kingdom did not consider such a restriction to be appropriate and available for authorisation in its territory is immaterial for that conclusion.
Dejstvo, da se Združenemu kraljestvu taka omejitev ni zdela primerna in razpoložljiva za odobritev na svojem ozemlju, je nebistveno za omenjeni sklep.
Sweden, however, has explained that that risk is less prevalent in Sweden thanks to the Swedish insurance system, in which householder insurances typically cover the cost of professional pest control in case of an infestation.
Švedska pa je pojasnila, da je tveganje na Švedskem manjše zaradi švedskega sistema zavarovanja, saj zavarovanja lastnika stanovanja običajno krijejo stroške poklicnega obvladovanja škodljivcev v primeru napada.
Sweden may restrict the authorisations granted in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 98/8/EC for the products mentioned in the Annex to this Decision to use by trained professionals with a license.
Švedska lahko omeji izdana dovoljenja za uporabo v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 98/8/ES za pripravke iz Priloge k temu sklepu na usposobljene poklicne uporabnike z dovoljenjem.
Products for which Sweden may restrict the authorisations granted in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 98/8/EC to use by trained professionals with a license
Pripravki, za katere lahko Švedska omeji izdana dovoljenja za uporabo pripravkov v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 98/8/ES na usposobljene poklicne uporabnike z dovoljenjem
Product name in Sweden
Ime pripravka na Švedskem
Swedish application reference number in R4BP
Referenčna številka švedske vloge v R4BP
on the position to be taken by the European Union in the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 (on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement
o stališču Evropske unije v Skupnem odboru EGP glede spremembe Protokola 31 (o sodelovanju na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode) in Protokola 37 (vsebuje seznam iz člena 101) k Sporazumu EGP
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 172, in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 172, v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
Protocol 31 to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [2] (‘the EEA Agreement’), contains provisions and arrangements concerning cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms,
Protokol 31 k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) vsebuje določbe in ureditve glede sodelovanja na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode.
It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 setting up the European GNSS Agency [3].
Primerno je razširiti sodelovanje pogodbenic Sporazuma EGP, tako da se vključi Uredba (EU) št. 912/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2010 o ustanovitvi Agencije za evropski GNSS [3].
As regards the participation of Norway, account should also be taken in this regard of the Cooperation Agreement on Satellite Navigation between the European Union and its Member States and the Kingdom of Norway [4], and in particular its Article 6 on security.
Glede sodelovanja Norveške bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi sporazum o sodelovanju na področju satelitske navigacije med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami ter Kraljevino Norveško [4], ter zlasti njegov člen 6 o varnosti.
Due to economic constraints, the participation of Iceland in the GNSS programmes should be suspended temporarily.
Zaradi ekonomskih omejitev bi bilo treba sodelovanje Islandije v programih GNSS začasno odložiti.
For the EEA Agreement to function well, Protocol 37 to the EEA Agreement should be extended to include the Security Accreditation Board for European GNSS systems and the Administrative Board set up by Regulation (EU) No 912/2010, and Protocol 31 should be amended in order to specify the procedures for participation,
Za dobro delovanje Sporazuma EGP bi bilo treba Protokol 37 k Sporazumu EGP razširiti, da se vključita svet za varnostno akreditacijo sistemov evropskega GNSS in upravni svet, ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 912/2010, in Protokol 31 bi bilo treba spremeniti, da se določijo podrobni postopki za sodelovanje –
The position to be taken by the European Union in the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendments to Protocol 31 and Protocol 37 to the EEA Agreement shall be based on the draft Decision of the EEA Joint Committee attached to this Decision.
Stališče Evropske unije v Skupnem odboru EGP o predloženi spremembi Protokola 31 in Protokola 37 k Sporazumu EGP temelji na osnutku sklepa Skupnega odbora EGP, priloženega k temu sklepu.
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86, 98 and 101 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor je bil spremenjen s Protokolom o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP), ter zlasti členov 86, 98 in 101 Sporazuma,
It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 setting up the European GNSS Agency [1].
Primerno je razširiti sodelovanje pogodbenic Sporazuma EGP, tako da se vključi Uredba (EU) št. 912/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2010 o ustanovitvi Agencije za evropski GNSS [1].
As regards the participation of Norway, account should also be taken in this regard of the Cooperation Agreement on Satellite Navigation between the European Union and its Member States and the Kingdom of Norway [2], and in particular its Article 6 on security.
Glede sodelovanja Norveške bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi sporazum o sodelovanju na področju satelitske navigacije med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami ter Norveško [2], zlasti njegov člen 6 o varnosti.
The EFTA States shall fully participate in the European GNSS Agency, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Agency’, as set up by the following Union act:
Države Efte polno sodelujejo v Agenciji za evropski GNSS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: agencija), kot je določeno v naslednjem aktu Unije:
By way of derogation from Article 12(2)(a) of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union, nationals of the EFTA States enjoying their full rights as citizens may be engaged under contract by the Executive Director of the Agency.
Z odstopanjem od člena 12(2)(a) Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropske unije lahko državljani držav Efte, ki uživajo vse državljanske pravice, z izvršilnim direktorjem agencije sklenejo pogodbo o zaposlitvi.
By virtue of Article 79(3) of the Agreement, Part VII (Institutional Provisions) of the Agreement, with the exception of Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter 3 of the Agreement, shall apply to this paragraph.
Na podlagi člena 79(3) Sporazuma se za ta odstavek uporablja del VII Sporazuma (Institucionalne določbe), razen oddelkov 1 in 2 poglavja 3 Sporazuma.
This paragraph shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’;
Ta odstavek se ne uporablja za Lihtenštajn.“;
the points 30 and 31 shall be deleted;
točki 30 in 31 se črtata;
This Decision shall enter into force on …, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee [3].
Ta sklep začne veljati …, če so bila Skupnemu odboru EGP v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma EGP predložena vsa uradna obvestila [3].
concerning the aid granted by Greece to cereal-producing farmers and cereal-collecting cooperatives
o pomoči, ki jo je Grčija odobrila pridelovalcem žita in zadrugam za zbiranje žit
(SA 27354 (C 36/10) (ex NN 3/10, ex CP 11/09))
št. SA 27354 (C 36/10) (ex NN 3/10, ex CP 11/09)
(notified under document C(2011) 9335)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2011) 9335)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) of the Treaty [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 108(2) Pogodbe [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 18 November 2008, the Commission received by e-mail information regarding aid allegedly granted by the Greek State to cereal-producing farmers and to Unions of Agricultural Cooperatives that collect cereals.
Komisija je bila 18. novembra 2008 po elektronski pošti obveščena o pomoči, ki naj bi jo Grčija odobrila pridelovalcem žita in združenjem kmetijskih zadrug za zbiranje žita.
The alleged aid took the form of interest-free loans.
Pomoč naj bi bila dodeljena v obliki brezobrestnih posojil.
By letter dated 21 November 2008, the Commission asked the Greek authorities to provide information on the aid in question.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 21. novembra 2008 pozvala grške organe, naj predložijo informacije o zadevni pomoči.
By letter dated 24 November 2008, the Commission asked the complainant to submit a complete complaint form.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 24. novembra 2008 pritožnico pozvala, naj predloži popoln obrazec za pritožbe.
The Commission received the form on 8 January 2009.
Komisija je obrazec prejela 8. januarja 2009.
Following receipt of the complaint form, and as the Greek authorities had not replied to its letter of 21 November 2008, the Commission sent them a second letter on 23 January 2009 requesting information on the measure in question.
Ker Komisija od grških organov ni prejela odgovora na dopis z dne 21. novembra 2008, jim je po prejetju obrazca za pritožbe 23. januarja 2009 poslala še en dopis, v katerem je zahtevala informacije o zadevnem ukrepu.
The Greek authorities did not reply by the deadline set in that letter and the Commission sent them a reminder on 24 March 2009.
Ker grški organi niso odgovorili do roka iz dopisa, jim je 24. marca 2009 poslala opomin.
On 14 May 2009, the Greek authorities sent the Commission a letter, providing only very limited information on the aid that was the subject of the complaint.
Grški organi so 14. maja 2009 Komisiji poslali dopis, v katerem so predložili le zelo omejene informacije o pomoči, v zvezi s katero je bila vložena pritožba.
On 11 June 2009, the Commission sent the Greek authorities a second request for information, with more detailed questions regarding the alleged State aid.
Komisija je 11. junija 2009 grškim organom poslala še eno zahtevo po informacijah, ki je vsebovala podrobnejša vprašanja v zvezi z domnevno državno pomočjo.
By e-mail of 1 September 2009, the Greek authorities asked for the deadline to be extended by another month.
Grški organi so v elektronski pošti z dne 1. septembra 2009 prosili za ponovno podaljšanje roka za en mesec.
By letter dated 14 September, the Commission granted a second deadline extension, until 30 September 2009.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 14. septembra odobrila drugo podaljšanje roka do 30. septembra 2009.
Over two months after the set deadline the Commission had still not received a reply and on 1 December 2009 it sent the Greek authorities a reminder, giving them one more month to provide the information.
Komisija več kot dva meseca po izteku tega roka še vedno ni prejela odgovora, zato je 1. decembra 2009 grškim organom poslala opomin, v katerem je rok za predložitev informacij podaljšala še za en mesec.
In the reminder, the Commission brought the Greek authorities’ attention to the fact that if they did not reply within the period prescribed, the Commission would require information to be provided (an ‘information injunction’) pursuant to Article 10(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [2] [3].
Komisija je v opominu grške organe opozorila, da bo, če odgovora ne bo prejela v določenem roku, zahtevala predložitev informacij (odredba o predložitvi podatkov) v skladu s členom 10(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [2] [3].
In addition, on 26 January 2010 the case was entered in the register of non-notified aid, under number NN 3/10.
Poleg tega je bila zadeva 26. januarja 2010 vpisana v register nepriglašene pomoči pod številko NN 3/10.
The deadline set by the Commission passed without the Greek authorities having provided any information.
Grški organi do izteka roka, ki ga je določila Komisija, niso predložili nobenih informacij.
Therefore, on 10 March 2010 the Commission adopted a decision pursuant to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 requiring the Greek authorities to provide the information required.
Zato je Komisija 10. marca 2010 sprejela sklep v skladu s členom 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, s katerim je od grških organov zahtevala, da ji predložijo zahtevane informacije.
It therefore sent another letter to the Greek authorities, dated 18 June 2010, giving them the opportunity to comment on the new information.
Zato je grškim organom 18. junija 2010 poslala še en dopis, v katerem jim je omogočila, da predložijo pripombe o teh novih informacijah.
The Greek authorities replied to the Commission’s letter of 17 May 2010, but did not provide any proof that they had sent the Commission a letter on 9 February 2010.
Grški organi so Komisiji odgovorili z dopisom z dne 17. maja 2010, vendar niso predložili nobenega dokaza, ki bi potrjeval, da so Komisiji 9. februarja 2010 poslali dopis.
On 30 September 2010, the Greek authorities replied to the Commission’s letter of 18 June 2010.
Grški organi so 30. septembra 2010 odgovorili na dopis Komisije z dne 18. junija 2010.
By letter dated 15 December 2010, the Commission notified Greece of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty concerning the aid concerned.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 15. decembra 2010 obvestila Grčijo o odločitvi, da bo na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe začela postopek v zvezi zadevno pomočjo.
The Commission’s decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4].
Odločitev Komisije o začetku postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments regarding the measure in question.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe v zvezi z zadevnim ukrepom.
The Commission received comments from one interested party, who argued that the measures in question were illegal.
Komisija je prejela pripombe ene zainteresirane strani, ki je trdila, da so zadevni ukrepi nezakoniti.
These comments were notified to the Greek authorities, who then submitted their comments in a letter dated 1 December 2011.
Grški organi so bili o teh pripombah obveščeni, svoje pripombe pa so predložili v dopisu z dne 1. decembra 2011.
Complaint
ΙΙ.1 Pritožba
On 18 November 2008, the Commission received by e-mail information regarding aid allegedly granted by the Greek State to cereal-producing farmers and to Unions of Agricultural Cooperatives.
Komisija je bila 18. novembra 2008 po elektronski pošti obveščena o pomoči, ki naj bi jo Grčija odobrila za pridelovalce žita in združenja kmetijskih zadrug.
According to this complaint, the aid took the form of the interest-free loans amounting to EUR 150 million granted to Unions of Agricultural Cooperatives in the cereals sector.
Glede na to pritožbo naj bi bila pomoč dodeljena združenjem kmetijskih zadrug v sektorju žit v obliki brezobrestnih posojil v višini 150 milijonov EUR.
Background
2 Ozadje
According to the information submitted by the Greek authorities, during 2008 Greek farmers sowed an additional 60 thousand hectares (600 thousand stremmata) of maize compared to the previous year.
Glede na informacije, ki so jih predložili grški organi, so grški kmetje leta 2008 posadili 60 tisoč hektarov (600000stremat) koruze več kot leto prej.
This resulted in significant over-production of maize, and subsequently a fall in prices.
To je povzročilo znatno prekomerno pridelavo koruze in posledično znižanje cen.
The same occurred with wheat.
Enako se je zgodilo v primeru pšenice.
Due to this fact, and due to the economic crisis, the Greek government decided to grant support to Greek producers.
Grška vlada se je zaradi navedenega in zaradi gospodarske krize odločila, da bo grškim pridelovalcem odobrila pomoč.
According to the Greek authorities, the support was granted to producer organisations, i.e. Unions of Agricultural Cooperatives (UACs).
Po navedbah grških organov je bila pomoč odobrena organizacijam proizvajalcev, tj. združenjem kmetijskih zadrug.
The UACs did not have the necessary funds to support farmers’ incomes, nor had they access to financial markets in order to arrange loans, because of the financial crisis.
Združenja kmetijskih zadrug niso imela potrebnih sredstev, da bi prispevala k povečanju prihodka pridelovalcev, zaradi finančne krize pa tudi niso imela dostopa do finančnih trgov, da bi lahko dobila posojilo.
The Greek authorities argued further that if, during the winter of 2008, the Cooperatives had sold the amounts of cereals collected, prices would have fallen significantly and producers would have suffered significant losses.
Grški organi so poleg tega trdili, da bi cene močno padle in da bi imeli pridelovalci znatne izgube, če bi zadruge pozimi leta 2008 prodale zbrano količino žit.
Therefore, in order to prevent a drop in cereal prices, and to ensure a minimum income for farmers, the Greek government decided to grant UACs, and indirectly farmers (who had delivered their produce to the Cooperatives), aid in the form of a State-guaranteed loan with an interest-rate subsidy.
Da bi se preprečil padec cen žita in zagotovil minimalni prihodek kmetom, se je grška vlada odločila, da bo združenjem kmetijskih zadrug in posredno kmetom (ki so svoje pridelke dostavili zadrugam) odobrila pomoč v obliki posojila z državnim poroštvom in subvencioniranjem obrestne mere.
Measure
ΙΙ.3 Ukrep
The Greek authorities adopted a number of Decisions putting the aid into effect.
Grški organi so sprejeli več sklepov o uveljavitvi zadevne pomoči.
Decision No 56700/B.3033 of 8 December 2008 of the Greek Minister for Economic Affairs and Finance stipulates, inter alia, the following:
Sklep grškega ministra za gospodarske zadeve in finance št. 56700/B.3033 z dne 8. decembra 2008 med drugim določa:
‘Article 1.
„Člen 1.
Article 3.
Člen 3.
The duration of the loans in question shall be from the date of granting to the date of repayment, which shall not be later than 30 September 2009. […].’
Zadevna posojila se uporabljajo od datuma odobritve do datuma vračila, in sicer najpozneje 30. septembra 2009.[…]“
Decision No 2/88675/0025 of 9 December 2008 of the Greek Minister for Economic Affairs and Finance stipulates, inter alia, the following:
Sklep grškega ministra za gospodarske zadeve in finance št. 2/88675/0025 z dne 9. decembra 2008 med drugim določa:
The Greek State shall grant a 100 % guarantee to secure the loans to be granted by financial institutions to Unions of Agricultural Cooperatives (UACs) and Primary Agricultural Cooperatives in Greece, to be used to pay producers for quantities of cereals purchased or received in 2008, in accordance with the provisions of Law 2322/1995.
Grčija odobri 100-odstotno poroštvo za zavarovanje posojil, ki jih bodo finančne institucije odobrile združenjem kmetijskih zadrug in primarnim kmetijskim zadrugam v Grčiji, pri čemer bodo ta posojila uporabljena za plačilo pridelovalcem za količine žit, kupljenih ali prejetih leta 2008, v skladu z določbami zakona št. 2322/1995.
The loans granted by financial institutions to UACs and Primary Agricultural Cooperatives in 2008 for the purchase of cereals shall be subject to the provisions of this Decision from the date they are granted.
Za posojila, ki jih bodo finančne institucije odobrile združenjem kmetijskih zadrug in primarnim kmetijskim zadrugam v letu 2008 za nakup žit, veljajo določbe tega sklepa od datuma odobritve zadevnih posojil.
The total amount of loans which have been, or will be, granted shall not exceed EUR 150 million. […]
Skupni znesek posojil, ki so bila ali bodo odobrena, ne sme presegati 150 milijonov EUR. […]
[…] In the event of failure to repay the unpaid part of the loan upon maturity, such amount shall become due and payable.
[…] Če se neplačan del posojila do zapadlosti ne vrne, zadevni znesek zapade in postane plačljiv.
In order to have their guaranteed claims reimbursed by the State, the Banks shall submit the supporting documents specified in Decision No 2/478/0025/04.01.2006 (Government Gazette, Series II, No 16, 13.1.2006) of the Minister for Economic Affairs and Finance within three months of maturity of the loan.’
Banke morajo za povračilo zajamčenih terjatev od države v treh mesecih po zapadlosti posojila predložiti dokazila iz Sklepa ministra za gospodarske zadeve in finance št. 2/478/0025 z dne 4. januarja 2006 (Uradni list, serija II, št. 16 z dne 13. januarja 2006).“