natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One party claimed that there exist so called ‘highly technical’ product types which are different from the other types of the product concerned produced in India but also in the Union.
Ena stran je trdila, da obstajajo vrste t. i. „visokotehnoloških“ izdelkov, ki se razlikujejo od drugih vrst zadevnega izdelka, proizvedenega v Indiji kot tudi v Uniji.
They further alleged that unlike most types exported from India to the Union, the technical types are not commodities but specific product types produced for specific uses in certain steel grades and certain diameters and should not be covered by the investigation.
Poleg tega je trdila, da visokotehnološke vrste v nasprotju z večino vrst, izvoženih iz Indije v Unijo, niso osnovni izdelki, temveč posebne vrste izdelka proizvedene za posebne uporabe, iz določene vrste jekla in z določenim premerom, zato se jih ne bi smelo vključiti v preiskavo.
At this stage, it appears that the technical types were part of the product definition and they have similar basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics compared to other types of the product concerned.
V tej fazi se zdi, da visokotehnološke vrste sodijo v opredelitev izdelka in imajo podobne osnovne, fizične, kemične in tehnične lastnosti v primerjavi z drugimi vrstami zadevnega izdelka.
Moreover, it appears that these types are also produced in by Union producers, hence the technical types are covered by the scope of the investigation.
Poleg tega kaže, da te vrste proizvajajo tudi proizvajalci v Uniji, torej tehnološke vrste sodijo v obseg preiskave.
The investigation that the product concerned and the product produced and sold on the domestic market of India, as well as the product produced by the Union industry and sold on the Union market have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo zadevni izdelek in izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Indije, ter izdelek, ki ga proizvaja industrija Unije in se prodaja na trgu Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe.
During the verification visits at the premises of the three sampled Indian exporting producers and the subsequent analysis of the collected information, it was found that they all had submitted some information which could not be considered to be reliable.
Med preveritvenimi obiski v prostorih treh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Indiji in med poznejšo analizo zbranih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da so vsi predložili nekaj informacij, ki jih ni bilo mogoče šteti za zanesljive.
In the case of one exporting producer, the Commission had found that the costs reported in its questionnaire reply was not in line and could not be reconciled with the costs reported in the producer’s internal accounting system.
Komisija je v primeru enega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov ugotovila, da stroški, ki jih je navedel v vprašalniku, niso skladni in jih ni bilo mogoče uskladiti s stroški, zabeleženimi v notranjem računovodskem sistemu proizvajalca.
The exporting producer alleged that the observed differences between the costs reported to the Commission and the costs found in the internal accounting system during the verification visit were due to errors in the registration of the transactions and to differences in accounting methods, in particular with regards to the raw material consumption.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da so ugotovljene razlike med stroški, sporočenimi Komisiji, in stroški, odkritimi v notranjem računovodskem sistemu med preveritvenim obiskom, posledica napak pri registraciji transakcij in razlik v računovodskih metodah, zlasti v zvezi s porabo surovin.
The exporting producer argued that the data in the internal accounting system was not reliable and should not be used for the purposes of the investigation.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil tudi, da podatki v notranjem računovodskem sistemu niso zanesljivi in se ne bi smeli uporabiti za namene preiskave.
Although the exporting producer has been using the same accounting system for several years, it claimed that the Commission should base its analysis on the costs reported in the questionnaire reply, not on the cost data contained in the company’s internal accounting system.
Čeprav proizvajalec izvoznik uporablja isti računovodski sistem že več let, je trdil, da bi morala analiza Komisije temeljiti na stroških, navedenih v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, in ne na podatkih o stroških iz notranjega računovodskega sistema družbe.
It should be noted that, whilst the data contained in the internal accounting system was consistent with the audited financial statements provided by the exporting producer, it has not been possible to establish during the verification visit the reconciliation and thus the link between the costs tables specifically prepared for the current investigation and the data contained in the internal accounting system.
Opozoriti je treba, da kljub temu, da so bili podatki iz notranjega računovodskega sistema skladni z revidiranimi računovodskimi izkazi, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec izvoznik, med preveritvenim obiskom ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti usklajenosti in s tem povezave med razpredelnicami stroškov, ki so bile posebej pripravljene za tekočo preiskavo, in podatki iz notranjega računovodskega sistema.
Hence, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, it is considered that the information found in the accounting system of the exporting producer should be used for the purpose of this anti-dumping investigation.
Zato se v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe šteje, da je treba za namen te protidampinške preiskave uporabiti informacije iz računovodskega sistema proizvajalca izvoznika.
For this reason, the Commission provisionally adjusted the cost data provided by the said exporting producer in its questionnaire reply by using the facts available in its internal accounting system.
Zaradi tega je Komisija začasno prilagodila podatke o stroških, ki jih je zagotovil navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, z uporabo razpoložljivih dejstev iz njegovega notranjega računovodskega sistema.
In the case of a second exporting producer, the Commission found that the purchases and the consumption of raw materials reported to the Commission in its questionnaire reply were not supported by the data found in the producer’s inventories management system.
Komisija je v primeru drugega proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovila, da podatki iz sistema za upravljanje zalog proizvajalca ne podpirajo podatkov o nakupih in porabi surovin, ki so bili Komisiji sporočeni v izpolnjenem vprašalniku.
In particular, it appeared that the distribution per steel grades was different in the two sources.
Zlasti se je izkazalo, da se je razdelitev po vrstah jekla v teh virih razlikovala.
The Commission notes that the steel grade is a key factor in the determination of the cost of the final product.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je vrsta jekla ključni dejavnik pri določanju cene končnega izdelka.
Unreliable information concerning the steel grade could seriously distort the calculations of costs and sales prices of individual product types and could therefore be misleading.
Nezanesljive informacije v zvezi z vrsto jekla bi lahko resno izkrivile izračune stroškov in prodajnih cen posameznih vrst izdelka in bi torej lahko bile zavajajoče.
The exporting producer claimed however that the computer files containing the purchases of raw material collected by the Commission during the verification visit were incomplete, because additional purchases of raw material had been made by other units in the company, but those purchases had not been reported and were not included in the computer files collected during the verification visit and examined by the Commission.
Toda proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da so bile računalniške datoteke, ki so vsebovale podatke o nakupih surovin in jih je Komisija zbrala med preveritvenim obiskom, nepopolne, saj so druge enote v družbi opravile dodatne nakupe surovin, vendar navedeni nakupi niso bili sporočeni ali vključeni v računalniške datoteke, ki jih je Komisija zbrala med preveritvenim obiskom in proučila.
Furthermore, the exporting producer claimed that the observed discrepancies in the quantities of steel grades were due to the fact that some steel grades were partly overlapping with each other and that some parts of the production process were not traceable on the level of individual steel grades.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da so opažene razlike v količinah vrst jekla posledica dejstva, da se nekatere vrste jekla delno medsebojno prekrivajo in da nekateri deli proizvodnega procesa niso sledljivi na ravni posameznih vrst jekla.
The Commission however notes that the above claims made by the company relating to the additional purchases of raw material are not sufficient to explain the observed discrepancies at the level of individual steel grades.
Vendar Komisija ugotavlja, da zgornje trditve družbe v zvezi z dodatnimi nakupi surovin ne zadostujejo za pojasnitev opaženih neskladij na ravni posameznih vrst jekla.
The Commission also notes that the company has alleged that it is not possible to make an exact tracing by individual steel grades in all the stages of the production process.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da družba trdi, da ni mogoče natančno slediti posameznim vrstam jekla v vseh fazah proizvodnega procesa.
This argument further undermines the reliability of the reporting system of steel grades as a whole.
Ta trditev še dodatno spodkopava zanesljivost celotnega sistema poročanja o vrstah jekla.
The information provided concerning steel grades must be provisionally considered misleading.
Predložene informacije v zvezi z vrstami jekla je treba začasno šteti za zavajajoče.
The Commission considers that the reported distribution of raw material by steel grade is not reliable and should be provisionally disregarded and that the determinations should be made on the basis of facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija meni, da sporočena razdelitev surovin po vrstah jekla ni zanesljiva in se je začasno ne sme upoštevati ter da morajo ugotovitve temeljiti na dostopnih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Due to the unreliability of the reporting system as a whole, it was not possible to make the determinations on the basis of any of the reported steel grades.
Zaradi nezanesljivosti celotnega sistema poročanja ugotovitev ni bilo mogoče utemeljiti s sporočenimi vrstami jekla.
Therefore the total consumption of all raw materials taken as a whole, without considering the distribution by steel grade, was used in calculating an overall dumping margin for all products.
Zato se je za izračun splošne stopnje dampinga za vse izdelke uporabila skupna poraba vseh surovin kot celota, brez upoštevanja razdelitve po vrstah jekla.
In the case of the third exporting producer, the Commission also found during the verification visit that the flows of raw materials reported in the questionnaire reply were not consistent with the data contained in the producer’s accounting system.
Komisija je v primeru tretjega proizvajalca izvoznika med preveritvenim obiskom ugotovila, da tokovi surovin, sporočeni v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, niso bili skladni s podatki iz računovodskega sistema proizvajalca.
It appeared that the distribution per steel grades was different in the two sources.
Zdelo se je, da se je razdelitev po vrstah jekla v dveh virih razlikovala.
The exporting producer, while admitting some errors in its questionnaire reply, alleged that the differences in the overall quantities of raw material could be reconciled by taking into account the changes in inventories.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je priznal nekaj napak v vprašalniku, ki ga je izpolnil, hkrati pa je trdil, da je razlike v skupnih količinah surovin mogoče uskladiti tako, da se upoštevajo spremembe v zalogah.
However, the company also alleged that partly overlapping steel grades make it impossible to make an exact reconciliation as per each individual steel grade.
Toda družba je trdila tudi, da zaradi delnega prekrivanja vrst jekla ni mogoče natančno uskladiti podatkov za vsako posamezno vrsto jekla.
The information provided concerning steel grades must be considered misleading.
Predložene informacije v zvezi z vrstami jekla je treba šteti za zavajajoče.
Each exporting producer received an individual letter outlining the specific and detailed reasons for which it was considered that some of the data provided in the questionnaire reply could not be accepted.
Vsak proizvajalec izvoznik je prejel individualno pismo, v katerem so bili navedeni posebni in podrobni razlogi za mnenje, da nekaterih podatkov, navedenih v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, ni mogoče sprejeti.
They were also informed that the Commission intended to make provisional findings on the basis of facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija jim je poleg tega sporočila, da namerava sprejeti začasne ugotovitve na podlagi dostopnih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
All three exporting producers were given the opportunity to comment and requested hearings which were granted to them.
Vsi trije proizvajalci izvozniki so imeli možnost, da predložijo pripombe, in so zahtevali zaslišanja, ki so bila odobrena.
They also provided their observations regarding the possible application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation in writing.
Predložili so tudi pisne pripombe glede možne uporabe člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
Despite the explanations obtained from the companies, they could not satisfactorily clarify the issues described above which led to the replacement of some of the data by best facts available.
Čeprav so družbe predložile pojasnila, z njimi ni bilo mogoče zadovoljivo razjasniti zgoraj opisanih vprašanj, zato so bili nekateri podatki zamenjani z najzanesljivejšimi dostopnimi dejstvi.
For the determination of normal value, the Commission first examined for each sampled exporting producer whether the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers was representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of the total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the IP in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za določitev normalne vrednosti je Komisija za vsakega od vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov najprej proučila, ali je bil celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam reprezentativen, tj. ali je celotni obseg te prodaje predstavljal vsaj 5 % skupnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v OP v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission found that the overall sales by each sampled producer of the like product on the domestic market were representative.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bil celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka vsakega vzorčenega proizvajalca na domačem trgu reprezentativen.
The Commission subsequently identified for the sampled producers having overall representative domestic sales those product types sold domestically which were identical or directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Union.
Komisija je nato opredelila tiste vrste izdelka, ki so jih vzorčeni proizvajalci, pri katerih je bil celotni obseg domače prodaje reprezentativen, prodali na domačem trgu in so bile enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Unijo.
However, as explained in Section 3.1, for two of the exporting producers the comparisons described hereunder were made on the basis of the total of all products, instead of comparing individual product types separately.
Vendar, kot je pojasnjeno v oddelku 3.1, so se primerjave, opisane spodaj, za dva od proizvajalcev izvoznikov opravile na podlagi skupne količine vseh izdelkov, namesto da bi se ločeno primerjale posamezne vrste izdelkov.
For each product type sold by each sampled producers on its domestic market and found to be identical or comparable with the product type sold for export to the Union, it was examined whether the domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki jo je vsak vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik prodal na domačem trgu in za katero se je izkazalo, da je enaka ali primerljiva z vrsto izdelka, prodanega za izvoz v Unijo, je bilo proučeno, ali je bila domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered sufficiently representative when the total volume of that product type sold on the domestic market to independent customers during the IP represented at least 5 % of the total volume of the identical or comparable product type sold for export to the Union.
Domača prodaja določene vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg prodaje navedene vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OP predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega enake ali primerljive vrste izdelka, prodanega za izvoz v Unijo.
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of each sampled producer could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali se prodaja na domačem trgu vsakega vzorčenega proizvajalca lahko šteje kot prodaja v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market during the IP.
To je bilo opravljeno tako, da je bil ugotovljen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v OP.
Where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average sales price was equal to or higher than the unit cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price calculated as the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the IP, irrespective of whether those sales were profitable or not.
Kadar je obseg prodaje določene vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, ki je enaka izračunanim proizvodnim stroškom ali je višja od njih, pomenil več kakor 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje zadevne vrste in kadar je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena enaka proizvodnim stroškom na enoto ali višja od njih, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje zadevne vrste v OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the unit cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price calculated as the weighted average price of only the profitable domestic sales of that type made during the IP.
Če je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje zadevne vrste ali je bila tehtana povprečna cena zadevne vrste nižja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtana povprečna cena zgolj dobičkonosne domače prodaje zadevne vrste v OP.
Where there were no sales of a like product in the ordinary course of trade or where a product type was not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, the Commission constructed normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Če ni bilo prodaje podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovanja ali če vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana v reprezentativnih količinah na domačem trgu, je Komisija konstruirala normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value was constructed by adding to the average cost of production during the investigation period, adjusted where necessary, the weighted average selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses incurred and the weighted average profit realised by the sampled exporting producers on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the investigation period.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da so se nastali in po potrebi prilagojeni tehtani povprečni prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PSA) ter tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki so ga s prodajo podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu v običajnem poteku trgovanja v obdobju preiskave ustvarili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, prišteli k njihovim povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom v obdobju preiskave.
Where necessary, in particular as explained in Section 3.1 above, the cost of production and SG&A expenses were adjusted, before being used in the ordinary course of trade test and for constructing normal value.
Proizvodni stroški in stroški PSA so bili po potrebi prilagojeni, zlasti kot je pojasnjeno v oddelku 3.1, preden so bili uporabljeni v preskusu običajnega poteka trgovanja in pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti.
Each company receives its individual detailed calculations used to determine their normal values and will be given the opportunity to comment.
Vsaka družba prejme svoje individualne podrobne izračune, uporabljene pri določitvi njene normalne vrednosti, in bo imela možnost predložiti pripombe.
The sampled exporting producers exported to the Union either directly to independent customers or through related companies.
Vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki so izdelke izvažali v Unijo neposredno neodvisnim strankam ali prek povezanih družb.
Where the product concerned was directly exported to independent customers in the Union, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
Kadar se je zadevni izdelek izvozil neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali se plačujejo.
Where export sales to the Union were made through a related company, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union.
Če je izvoz v Unijo potekal prek povezane družbe, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič preprodan neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
In such cases, adjustments were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including duties and taxes, as well as for SG&A and profits.
V takih primerih so bile prilagoditve izvedene za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno z dajatvami in davki, ter za stroške PSA in dobiček.
The related importer’s own SG&A costs were used and a reasonable profit margin was established on the basis of the profit margin attained by an independent importer of the product concerned.
Uporabljeni so bili stroški PSA povezanega izvoznika, smiselna stopnja dobička pa je bila določena na podlagi stopnje dobička neodvisnega izvoznika zadevnega izdelka.
The normal value and export price of the sampled exporting producers were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov sta bili primerjani na podlagi franko tovarna.
On this basis, adjustments were made for transport, ocean freight and insurance costs, handling loading and ancillary costs, packing costs, credit costs, discounts and commissions where demonstrated to affect price comparability.
Na tej podlagi so se opravile prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški kopenskega in čezmorskega prevoza, stroški zavarovanja, manipulativnimi stroški, stroški natovarjanja in tozadevnimi stroški, stroški pakiranja in kredita, popusti in provizijami, če se je pokazalo, da vplivajo na primerljivost cen.