natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
late on-the-spot checks for agri-envi measures, Article 25 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 not respected in case of the announcement of the on-the-spot checks in Pugia region
zamujeni pregledi na kraju samem za kmetijskookoljske ukrepe, neupoštevanje člena 25(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 796/2004 v primeru najave pregleda na kraju samem v Apuliji
wrongful transfer of the rights of one certificate leading to wrongful payment of export refunds
neupravičen prenos pravic enega dovoljenja, ki vodi v neupravičeno plačilo izvoznega nadomestila
some GAEC not defined and weaknesses in sanctioning system (claim year 2005)
nekateri DKOP niso določeni, slabosti v sistemu sankcij (leto zahtevka 2005)
some GAEC not defined (claim year 2006)
nekateri DKOP niso določeni (leto zahtevka 2006)
some GAEC not defined (claim year 2007)
nekateri DKOP niso določeni (leto zahtevka 2007)
population excluded from on-the-spot checks
populacija, izključena iz pregledov na kraju samem
Other Direct Aid — Ewe and Goats
Druge neposredne pomoči – ovce in koze
amounts paid for less than 10 quota rights
zneski, plačani za manj ko 10 kvotnih pravic
non-recovered amounts for errors in the EAGF IACS population
neizterjani zneski za napake pri množici EKJS IAKS
6701 Total
6701 Skupaj
known errors in the EAFRD IACS population
znane napake pri množici EKSRP IAKS
known errors in the EAFRD non-IACS population
znane napake pri množici EKSRP ne-IAKS
overpayments in the EAFRD
preplačila pri EKSRP
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1 + 3 — Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)
Razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) Osi 1 + 3 – ukrepi, usmerjeni v naložbe (2007–2013)
control weaknesses
pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 4 LEADER (2007-2013)
Razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) Os 4 – LEADER (2007–2013)
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007-2013, area related measures)
Razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) Os 2 (2007–2013, ukrepi, vezani na površino)
most likely error
najverjetnejša napaka
systematic error
sistematična napaka
systematic error - RURIS
sistematična napaka – RURIS
Clearance of accounts — Financial Clearance
Potrditev obračunov – finančna potrditev
known error found in the completeness test of Annex II and III A
znana napaka, ugotovljena v zvezi s preizkusom popolnosti iz prilog II in III A
6711 Total
6711 Skupaj
late payments
zamujeno plačilo
Total RO
Skupaj RO
05 07 01 07 Total
05 07 01 07 Skupaj
granting a derogation from Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European statistics on permanent crops with regard to the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic
o odobritvi odstopanja od Uredbe (EU) št. 1337/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o evropski statistiki trajnih nasadov v zvezi z Zvezno republiko Nemčijo in Francosko republiko
(notified under document C(2012) 4132)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 4132)
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 concerning European statistics on permanent crops and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 and Directive 2001/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [1], and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1337/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o evropski statistiki trajnih nasadov in o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 357/79 in Direktive 2001/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1] ter zlasti člena 10(1) Uredbe,
Having regard to the requests made by the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic,
ob upoštevanju zahtev Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike,
In accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011, where the application of this Regulation to the national statistical system of a Member State requires major adaptations and is likely to cause significant practical problems with regard to the permanent crops referred to in points (a) to (l) of Article 1(1), the Commission may grant Member States a derogation.
V skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 1337/2011, kadar uporaba te uredbe v nacionalnih statističnih sistemih držav članic zahteva večje prilagoditve in bo verjetno povzročila resne težave v praksi v zvezi s trajnimi nasadi iz točk (a) do (l) člena 1(1), Komisija lahko državam članicam odobri odstopanje.
The Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic have requested derogations from the application of Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 in accordance with Article 10(2) thereof.
Zvezna republika Nemčija in Francoska republika sta v skladu s členom 10(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1337/2011 zahtevali odstopanji od uporabe navedene uredbe.
The information provided by the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic justifies granting those derogations.
Informacije, ki sta jih predložili Zvezna republika Nemčija in Francoska republika, upravičujejo odobritev odstopanj.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Statistics,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za kmetijsko statistiko –
The Federal Republic of Germany is granted derogation from its obligation to submit statistics on the permanent crops referred to in points (a) to (l) of Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 until 31 December 2012.
Zvezni republiki Nemčiji se odobri odstopanje od obveznosti za predložitev statistike o trajnih nasadih iz točk (a) do (l) člena 1(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1337/2011 do 31. decembra 2012.
The derogation is granted for the reference year 2012.
To odstopanje se odobri za referenčno leto 2012.
The French Republic is granted derogation from its obligation to submit statistics on olive trees until 31 December 2012.
Francoski republiki se odobri odstopanje od obveznosti za predložitev statistike o oljkah do 31. decembra 2012.
OJ L 347, 30.12.2011, p. 7.
UL L 347, 30.12.2011, str. 7.
on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, amending the Annexes to Protocols 1 and 2 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part
o podpisu Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo na eni strani in Državo Izrael na drugi strani o spremembi prilog k protokoloma 1 in 2 Evro-mediteranskega sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Državo Izrael na drugi strani, v imenu Unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 207(4), v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
On 20 November 1995, the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part [1] (hereinafter ‘the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement’) was signed.
Evro-mediteranski sporazum o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Državo Izrael na drugi strani [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Evro-mediteranski sporazum) je bil podpisan 20. novembra 1995.
On 14 November 2005, the Council authorised the Commission to conduct negotiations in order to achieve greater liberalisation of trade in agricultural products, processed agricultural products and fish and fishery products with certain Mediterranean countries.
Svet je 14. novembra 2005 pooblastil Komisijo za vodenje pogajanj, da se doseže večja liberalizacija trgovine s kmetijskimi proizvodi, predelanimi kmetijskimi proizvodi ter ribami in ribiškimi proizvodi z nekaterimi sredozemskimi državami.
After the entry into force of the 2010 Agreement, the European Commission and Israel held a number of technical meetings relating to its implementation.
Potem ko je Sporazum iz leta 2010 začel veljati, sta se Evropska komisija in Izrael nekajkrat srečala na tehničnih sestankih v zvezi z njegovim izvajanjem.
The Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date,
Sporazum bi bilo treba podpisati v imenu Evropske unije s pridržkom njegove poznejše sklenitve –
The signing of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, amending the Annexes to Protocols 1 and 2 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, is hereby authorised on behalf of the Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement [3].
Podpis Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo na eni strani in Državo Izrael na drugi strani o spremembi prilog k Protokoloma 1 in 2 Evro-mediteranskega Sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Državo Izrael na drugi strani (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) se v imenu Unije odobri, s pridržkom poznejše sklenitve Sporazuma [3].
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e) za podpis Sporazuma v imenu Unije, s pridržkom njegove sklenitve.
OJ L 313, 28.11.2009, p. 83.
UL L 313, 28.11.2009, str. 83.
The negotiations with Israel were successfully concluded on 18 July 2008.
Pogajanja z Izraelom so bila uspešno zaključena 18. julija 2008.
The results of those negotiations are contained in an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the State of Israel concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products, processed agricultural products and fish and fishery products, the replacement of Protocols 1 and 2 and their Annexes and amendments to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part [2] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2010 Agreement’), which entered into force on 1 January 2010.
Rezultati teh pogajanj so vsebovani v Sporazumu v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko skupnostjo in Državo Izrael o vzajemnih ukrepih liberalizacije v zvezi s kmetijskimi proizvodi, predelanimi kmetijskimi proizvodi ter ribami in ribiškimi proizvodi, nadomestitvi protokolov 1 in 2 ter njunih prilog ter spremembah Evro-mediteranskega sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Državo Izrael na drugi strani [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum iz leta 2010), ki je začel veljati 1. januarja 2010.
Those meetings showed that some technical adjustments to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement were necessary in order to comply with the commitments of the previous agreements between the European Communities and the State of Israel, which entered into force in 2000 and 2006.
Na teh sestankih se je pokazalo, da so potrebne nekatere tehnične prilagoditve Evro-mediteranskega sporazuma, da bi bil skladen z zavezami iz prejšnjih sporazumov med Evropsko skupnostjo in Državo Izrael, ki so začeli veljati v letih 2000 in 2006.
On 19 September 2011, the Commission and Israel concluded the negotiation of the necessary technical adjustments, which are contained in a new Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, amending the Annexes to Protocols 1 and 2 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’).
Dne 19. septembra 2011 sta Komisija in Izrael sklenila pogajanja o potrebnih tehničnih prilagoditvah, ki so vsebovane v novem Sporazumu v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo na eni strani in Državo Izrael na drugi strani o spremembi prilog k Protokoloma 1 in 2 Evro-mediteranskega Sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Državo Izrael na drugi strani (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum).
on the State aid No SA.26117 — C 2/10 (ex NN 62/09) implemented by Greece in favour of Aluminium of Greece SA
o državni pomoči št. SA.26117 – C 2/10 (ex NN 62/09), ki jo je Grčija dodelila družbi Aluminium of Greece SA
(notified under document C(2011) 4916)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2011) 4916)
Having regard to the decision by which the Commission decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [1],
ob upoštevanju odločitve Komisije, da začne postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) PDEU [1],
In July 2008 the Commission received two complaints alleging aid in favour of Aluminium of Greece and its successor company Aluminium SA, 100 % successor of Aluminium of Greece in the aluminium production since July 2007 (hereinafter referred to jointly as AoG).
Komisija je julija 2008 prejela dve pritožbi glede domnevne pomoči v korist družbe Aluminium of Greece in njene naslednice, družbe Aluminium SA, ki je julija 2007 v celoti nasledila družbo Aluminium of Greece pri proizvodnji aluminija (v nadaljnjem besedilu sta družbi skupaj imenovani družba AoG).
The complaints concerned two alleged State aid measures; a preferential electricity tariff and the construction of a gas pipeline linking AoG to the main grid.
Pritožbi sta se nanašali na dva domnevna ukrepa državne pomoči: ugodnejšo ceno električne energije in izgradnjo plinovoda, ki je družbo AoG povezala z glavnim omrežjem.
By letter dated 27 January 2010 the Commission informed Greece that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) in respect of the measures.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 27. januarja 2010 uradno obvestila Grčijo, da bo v zvezi z ukrepi začela postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
Greece submitted its comments to the Commission’s opening decision on 31 March 2010.
Grčija je svoje pripombe na sklep Komisije o začetku postopka predložila 31. marca 2010.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Sklep Komisije o začetku postopka je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Commission requested additional information from the Greek authorities on 1 December 2010, to which Greece replied by letter of 11 February 2011.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 1. decembra 2010 od grških organov zahtevala dodatna pojasnila, ki jih je Grčija poslala z dopisom z dne 11. februarja 2011.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ALLEGED AID
PODROBEN OPIS DOMNEVNE POMOČI
II(a) THE BENEFICIARY
II(a) UPRAVIČENKA
AoG is a large company, located in the region of Viotia, Greece.
Družba AoG je veliko podjetje s sedežem v prefekturi Viotia v Grčiji.
It is active in the production of aluminium as raw material.
Ukvarja se s proizvodnjo aluminija kot surovine.
In July 2007, AoG was split into two newly created companies, after a division of sectors: (a) Aluminium SA and (b) Endessa Hellas SA.
Družba AoG se je julija 2007, po razdelitvi sektorjev, razdelila na dve novoustanovljeni podjetji: (a) družbo Aluminium SA in (b) družbo Endessa Hellas SA.
Aluminium took over the aluminium production and Endessa Hellas took over the electricity production (AoG had acquired permits for electricity production a few years earlier).
Družba Aluminium je prevzela proizvodnjo aluminija, družba Endessa Hellas pa proizvodnjo električne energije (družba AoG je nekaj let pred tem pridobila dovoljenje za proizvodnjo električne energije).
Therefore, Aluminium is the 100 % successor of AoG in the aluminium production.
Zato je družba Aluminium v celoti nasledila družbo AoG pri proizvodnji aluminija.
AoG also owns three electricity production units, located next to its aluminium plant.
Družba AoG ima v lasti tudi tri enote za proizvodnjo električne energije, ki se nahajajo ob tovarni aluminija.
In 2009 it had a turnover of EUR 427,3 million (with EBT of EUR 34,4 million) and 960 employees.
Leta 2009 je imela promet v višini 427,3 milijona EUR (z dobičkom pred davki (EBT) v višini 34,4 milijona EUR) in 960 zaposlenih.
In 2006 (year before the aid measures under scrutiny) it had a turnover of EUR 470,9 million (23 % increase since 2005), with EBT of EUR 102,5 million (39 % increase since 2005), and 1047 employees.
Leta 2006 (leto pred ukrepi pomoči, ki se preiskujejo) je imela promet v vrednosti 470,9 milijona EUR (23-odstotno povečanje prometa od leta 2005), z dobičkom pred davki (EBT) v višini 102,5 milijona EUR (39-odstotno povečanje dobička od leta 2005) in 1047 zaposlenih.
It belongs to the private business group ‘Mitilineos S.A.’ since 2005.
Družba AoG je od leta 2005 del zasebne poslovne skupine „Mitilineos SA“.
II(b) MEASURE 1: PREFERENTIAL ELECTRICITY TARIFF
II(b) UKREP 1: UGODNEJŠA CENA ELEKTRIČNE ENERGIJE
AoG was established in 1960, with certain privileges granted by the Greek State, including electricity supply at reduced price.
Družba AoG je bila ustanovljena leta 1960, Grčija pa ji je podelila določene ugodnosti, vključno z dobavo električne energije po nižjih cenah.
Under the terms of the statutes laying down the privileges, the supply of electricity at reduced rate was due to expire in March 2006, provided that PPC gave AoG due notice thereof two years in advance.
Pod pogoji statutov, ki so določali ugodnosti, bi morala ugodnost dobave električne energije po nižjih cenah prenehati veljati marca 2006, če bi podjetje PPC družbo AoG o tem pravočasno obvestilo dve leti prej.
On 26 February 2004 (i.e. more than two years before the privilege’s expiry), PPC duly gave AoG such notice, following which PPC stopped applying the preferential rate at the end of March 2006.
Podjetje PPC je 26. februarja 2004 (tj. več kot dve leti pred iztekom ugodnosti) o tem pravočasno obvestilo družbo AoG, konec marca 2006 pa ji je prenehalo zaračunavati ugodnejšo ceno.
Consequently, from March 2006 until January 2007, AoG paid the standard electricity tariff applicable to large industrial consumers.
Zato je od marca 2006 do januarja 2007 družba AoG za električno energijo plačevala standardno ceno, ki se je uporabljala za velike industrijske odjemalce.
However, AoG challenged the termination of the preferential rate in court and in January 2007, a first instance court ordered as an interim measure that the preferential rate be resumed pending a judgement on the substance.
Vendar je družba AoG ukinitev ugodnejše cene izpodbijala na sodišču, januarja 2007 pa je sodišče prve stopnje kot začasni ukrep, pred izrekom sodbe o zadevi, odredilo ponovno uvedbo ugodnejše cene.
This interim decision was in turn appealed by PPC and overturned in March 2008 (a judgment on the substance is still pending).
Podjetje PPC se je pritožilo zoper to začasno odločbo, ki je bila razveljavljena marca 2008 (sodba o zadevi še ni končana).
II(c) MEASURE 2: EXTENSION OF THE GAS GRID TO AoG
II(c) UKREP 2: RAZŠIRITEV PLINOVODNEGA OMREŽJA DO DRUŽBE AOG
The national gas transmission system in Greece can be extended at the request of a (potential) customer provided that the following conditions are met:
Nacionalno prenosno plinsko omrežje v Grčiji se lahko na zahtevo (morebitnega) odjemalca razširi, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
a favourable opinion is granted by the Regulatory Authority for Energy (hereinafter ‘RAE’), the Greek energy regulator,
regulativni organ za energijo, grški energetski regulator, mora podati pozitivno mnenje,
the grid operator is satisfied that it will be able, in time, to recoup the cost of the extension through the tariff revenues from the grid.
upravljavec omrežja mora biti prepričan, da se mu bodo stroški razširitve pravočasno povrnili s prihodki, ki jih prinaša omrežje.
In the case of AoG, the national grid was extended by the building of a 29,5 km pipeline that would allow to connect AoG following the favourable opinion of RAE (15 April 2005) and the approval by the transmission system operator (13 June 2005) [3].
V primeru družbe AoG je bilo po podanem pozitivnem mnenju regulativnega organa za energijo (15. aprila 2005) in odobritvi s strani upravljavca prenosnega sistema (13. junija 2005) nacionalno omrežje razširjeno z izgradnjo 29,5 km dolgega plinovoda, s katerim so povezali družbo AoG [3].
The operations of the gas pipeline started on 16 May 2008.
Plinovod je začel delovati 16. maja 2008.
The total construction cost of the extension was EUR 12,64 million. Of that, EUR 9,04 million were paid by the National Gas System Operator, i.e. the owner of the national gas transmission system (hereafter: ‘NGSO’), EUR 3,3 million were paid by AoG and EUR 3,6 million were financed through the Community Support Framework 2000-2006 [4].
Skupni stroški izgradnje razširitve so znašali 12,64 milijona EUR. Od tega je 9,04 milijona EUR plačala družba National Gas System Operator (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba NGSO), 3,3 milijona EUR družba AoG, 3,6 milijona EUR pa je bilo dodeljenih prek okvira podpore Skupnosti za obdobje 2000–2006 [4].
GROUNDS FOR INITIATING THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE
RAZLOGI ZA ZAČETEK URADNEGA POSTOPKA PREISKAVE
In the opening decision of 27 January 2010, the Commission questioned whether the privileged electricity tariff charged to AoG by PPC after March 2006 was at the same level as for all large industrial consumers.
V sklepu o začetku postopka z dne 27. januarja 2010 je Komisijo zanimalo, ali je bila ugodnejša cena električne energije, ki jo je podjetje PPC po marcu 2006 zaračunavalo družbi AoG, na enaki ravni kot za vse velike industrijske odjemalce.
Reason for the Commission’s doubts was that the privileged tariff was set to expire in March 2006, under the terms of AoG’s establishment statutes laying down the privileges.
Razlog za pomisleke Komisije je bil v tem, da bi morala ugodnejša cena prenehati veljati marca 2006, pod pogoji iz ustanovitvenih statutov družbe AoG, ki so določali ugodnosti.
Reference was made to the fact that PPC had duly tried to terminate the privilege, however the latter was extended by a court’s decision.
Navedeno je bilo, da je podjetje PPC poskušalo pravočasno ukiniti ugodnost, ki pa je bila nato podaljšana s sodno odločbo.
As regards the measure of the extension of the national gas transmission system to AoG, in the opening decision of 27 January 2010, the Commission questioned why the construction cost of the pipeline had mainly been borne by the State and not by AoG.
Glede ukrepa, s katerim je bilo nacionalno plinsko omrežje razširjeno do družbe AoG, je Komisijo v sklepu o začetku postopka z dne 27. januarja 2010 zanimalo, zakaj je stroške izgradnje plinovoda večinoma krila država in ne družba AoG.
Those doubts were raised in the absence of information from Greece, despite the Commission’s repeated requests, which was also the reason why the opening decision included an information injunction to Greece.
Ti pomisleki so se pojavili, ker Grčija kljub večkratnim zahtevam s strani Komisije ni predložila nobenih informacij; to je bil tudi razlog, zakaj je bila v sklep o začetku postopka vključena odredba o predložitvi podatkov za Grčijo.
COMMENTS FROM GREECE AND INTERESTED PARTIES
PRIPOMBE GRČIJE IN ZAINTERESIRANIH STRANI
IV(a) COMMENTS FROM GREECE AND THE BENEFICIARY
IV(a) PRIPOMBE GRČIJE IN UPRAVIČENKE
Measure 1:
Ukrep 1:
Preferential electricity tariff
ugodnejša cena električne energije