natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member States should decide on an appropriate form of funding for ADR entities on their territories, without restricting the funding of entities that are already operational.
Države članice bi morale določiti ustrezno obliko financiranja za organe ARS na svojem ozemlju, ne da bi pri tem omejile financiranje že delujočih organov ARS.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the question of whether ADR entities are publicly or privately funded or funded through a combination of public and private funding.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v vprašanje, ali se organi ARS financirajo iz javnih ali zasebnih ali iz kombinacije javnih in zasebnih virov.
However, ADR entities should be encouraged to specifically consider private forms of funding and to utilise public funds only at Member States’ discretion.
Vseeno bi bilo treba organe ARS spodbujati, da se usmerijo zlasti k oblikam zasebnega financiranja in uporabljajo javna sredstva le po presoji držav članic.
This Directive should not affect the possibility for businesses or for professional organisations or business associations to fund ADR entities.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na možnost, da organe ARS financirajo podjetja, poklicne organizacije ali poslovna združenja.
When a dispute arises it is necessary that consumers are able to identify quickly which ADR entities are competent to deal with their complaint and to know whether or not the trader concerned will participate in proceedings submitted to an ADR entity.
Ob nastanku spora morajo imeti potrošniki možnost, da hitro ugotovijo, kateri organi ARS so pristojni za obravnavo njihove pritožbe in ali bo zadevni trgovec sodeloval v postopku, predloženem organu ARS.
Traders who commit to use ADR entities to resolve disputes with consumers should inform consumers of the address and website of the ADR entity or entities by which they are covered.
Trgovci, ki se zavežejo, da bodo spore s potrošniki reševali prek organov ARS, bi morali potrošnike obvestiti o naslovu in spletnem mestu organa ali organov ARS, ki jih pokrivajo.
That information should be provided in a clear, comprehensible and easily accessible way on the trader’s website, where one exists, and if applicable in the general terms and conditions of sales or service contracts between the trader and the consumer.
Navedene informacije bi morale biti jasne, razumljive in lahko dostopne na spletnem mestu trgovca, če ga ima, in navedene v splošnih pogojih pogodb o prodaji ali pogodb o storitvah, sklenjenih med trgovcem in potrošnikom, če je to primerno.
Traders should have the possibility of including on their websites, and in the terms and conditions of the relevant contracts, any additional information on their internal complaint handling procedures or on any other ways of directly contacting them with a view to settling disputes with consumers without referring them to an ADR entity.
Trgovci bi morali imeti možnost, da na svojih spletnih mestih in v splošnih pogojih zadevnih pogodb navedejo katere koli dodatne informacije o svojih notranjih postopkih za obravnavo pritožb ali o morebitnih drugih načinih, kako lahko potrošniki z njimi vzpostavijo neposreden stik, da bi se spori rešili brez predložitve organu ARS.
Where a dispute cannot be settled directly, the trader should provide the consumer, on paper or another durable medium, with the information on relevant ADR entities and specify if he will make use of them.
Kadar spora neposredno ni mogoče rešiti, bi moral trgovec potrošniku na papirju ali drugem trajnem nosilcu podatkov posredovati informacije o zadevnih organih ARS in navesti, ali bo spor reševal prek njih.
The obligation on traders to inform consumers about the ADR entities by which those traders are covered should be without prejudice to provisions on consumer information on out-of-court redress procedures contained in other Union legal acts, which should apply in addition to the relevant information obligation provided for in this Directive.
Obveznost trgovcev, da obvestijo potrošnike o organih ARS, ki jih pokrivajo, ne bi smela posegati v določbe o obveščanju potrošnikov o postopkih izvensodnega reševanja iz drugih pravnih aktov Unije, ki bi se morale uporabljati poleg obveznosti sporočanja zadevnih informacij, določene v tej direktivi.
This Directive should not require the participation of traders in ADR procedures to be mandatory or the outcome of such procedures to be binding on traders, when a consumer has lodged a complaint against them.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela zahtevati, da morajo trgovci obvezno sodelovati v postopkih ARS, ali da so rezultati takšnih postopkov za trgovce zavezujoči, če je potrošnik proti njim vložil pritožbo.
However, in order to ensure that consumers have access to redress and that they are not obliged to forego their claims, traders should be encouraged as far as possible to participate in ADR procedures.
Vendar bi, da bi zagotovili, da imajo potrošniki dostop do pravnih sredstev in niso obvezani, da se odpovejo svojim zahtevkom, bilo treba trgovce čim bolj spodbujati k sodelovanju v postopkih ARS.
Therefore, this Directive should be without prejudice to any national rules making the participation of traders in such procedures mandatory or subject to incentives or sanctions or making their outcome binding on traders, provided that such legislation does not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Zato ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v morebitne nacionalne predpise, na podlagi katerih je sodelovanje trgovcev v takih postopkih obvezno ali se ga spodbuja, oziroma so za nesodelovanje predpisane sankcije ali so rezultati postopkov za trgovce zavezujoči, če ti predpisi strankama ne preprečujejo uveljavljanja pravice dostopa do sodnega sistema, ki jo določa člen 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
In order to avoid an unnecessary burden being placed on ADR entities, Member States should encourage consumers to contact the trader in an effort to solve the problem bilaterally before submitting a complaint to an ADR entity.
Da bi preprečili nepotrebno obremenitev organov ARS, bi morale države članice spodbujati potrošnike, naj stopijo v stik s trgovcem, da bi spor rešili dvostransko, preden vložijo pritožbo pri organu ARS.
In many cases, doing so would allow consumers to settle their disputes swiftly and at an early stage.
V mnogih primerih bi potrošniki svoje spore tako lahko rešili hitro in v začetni fazi.
Member States should involve the representatives of professional organisations, business associations and consumer organisations when developing ADR, in particular in relation to the principles of impartiality and independence.
Države članice bi morale pri razvoju sistemov ARS vključiti predstavnike poklicnih organizacij, poslovnih združenj ter potrošnikih organizacij, zlasti v zvezi z načeli nepristranskosti in neodvisnosti.
Member States should ensure that ADR entities cooperate on the resolution of cross-border disputes.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da organi ARS sodelujejo pri reševanju čezmejnih sporov.
Networks of ADR entities, such as the financial dispute resolution network ‘FIN-NET’ in the area of financial services, should be strengthened within the Union.
Znotraj Unije bi bilo treba okrepiti mreže organov ARS, kot je mreža za reševanje finančnih sporov „FIN-NET“ na področju finančnih storitev.
Member States should encourage ADR entities to become part of such networks.
Države članice bi morale organe ARS spodbujati k vključitvi v takšne mreže.
Close cooperation between ADR entities and national authorities should strengthen the effective application of Union legal acts on consumer protection.
Tesno sodelovanje med organi ARS in nacionalnimi organi bi moralo krepiti učinkovito uporabo pravnih aktov Unije o varstvu potrošnikov.
The Commission and the Member States should facilitate cooperation between the ADR entities, in order to encourage the exchange of best practice and technical expertise and to discuss any problems arising from the operation of ADR procedures.
Komisija in države članice bi morale lajšati sodelovanje organov ARS, da bi spodbudile izmenjavo najboljših praks in tehničnega znanja ter razpravo o morebitnih težavah v zvezi z vodenjem postopkov ARS.
Such cooperation should be supported, inter alia, through the Union’s forthcoming Consumer Programme.
Tako sodelovanje bi moralo biti podprto tudi s prihodnjim programom Unije o varstvu potrošnikov.
In order to ensure that ADR entities function properly and effectively, they should be closely monitored.
Organe ARS bi bilo treba pozorno spremljati, da se zagotovi njihovo pravilno in učinkovito delovanje.
For that purpose, each Member States should designate a competent authority or competent authorities which should perform that function.
V ta namen bi morala vsaka država članica določiti pristojni organ ali pristojne organe, ki bi morali opravljati to funkcijo.
The Commission and competent authorities under this Directive should publish and update a list of ADR entities that comply with this Directive.
Komisija in organi, pristojni na podlagi te direktive, bi morali objaviti in posodabljati seznam organov ARS, ki izpolnjujejo določbe te direktive.
Member States should ensure that ADR entities, the European Consumer Centre Network, and, where appropriate, the bodies designated in accordance with this Directive publish that list on their website by providing a link to the Commission’s website, and whenever possible on a durable medium at their premises.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da organi ARS, mreža evropskih potrošniških centrov in po potrebi organi, določeni v skladu s to direktivo, objavijo navedeni seznam na svojem spletnem mestu tako, da navedejo povezavo na spletno mesto Komisije in, če je mogoče, na trajnem nosilcu podatkov v svojih prostorih.
Furthermore, Member States should also encourage relevant consumer organisations and business associations to publish the list.
Poleg tega bi morale države članice prav tako spodbujati zadevne potrošniške organizacije in poslovna združenja, naj objavijo seznam.
Member States should also ensure the appropriate dissemination of information on what consumers should do if they have a dispute with a trader.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti tudi ustrezno širjenje informacij o tem, kako naj ravnajo potrošniki v primeru spora s trgovcem.
In addition, competent authorities should publish regular reports on the development and functioning of ADR entities in their Member States.
Poleg tega bi morali pristojni organi objavljati redna poročila o razvoju in delovanju organov ARS v njihovih državah članicah.
ADR entities should notify to competent authorities specific information on which those reports should be based.
Organi ARS bi morali pristojnim organom sporočiti določene informacije, na katerih naj bi temeljila ta poročila.
Member States should encourage ADR entities to provide such information using Commission Recommendation 2010/304/EU of 12 May 2010 on the use of a harmonised methodology for classifying and reporting consumer complaints and enquiries [11].
Države članice bi morale organe ARS spodbujati, naj se pri predložitvi takšnih informacij oprejo na Priporočilo Komisije 2010/304/EU z dne 12. maja 2010 o uporabi usklajene metodologije za klasifikacijo pritožb in poizvedb potrošnikov ter poročanje o njih [11].
It is necessary for Member States to lay down rules on penalties for infringements of the national provisions adopted to comply with this Directive and to ensure that those rules are implemented.
Države članice morajo določiti pravila o kaznih za kršitev nacionalnih določb, sprejetih zaradi skladnosti s to direktivo, in zagotoviti, da se ta pravila izvajajo.
Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) [12] should be amended to include a reference to this Directive in its Annex so as to reinforce cross-border cooperation on enforcement of this Directive.
Uredbo (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov [12] („Uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov“), bi bilo treba spremeniti tako, da se v njeno prilogo vključi sklic na to direktivo ter se tako okrepi čezmejno sodelovanje pri izvrševanju te direktive.
Directive 2009/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on injunctions for the protection of consumers’ interests [13] (Injunctions Directive) should be amended to include a reference to this Directive in its Annex so as to ensure that the consumers’ collective interests laid down in this Directive are protected.
Direktivo 2009/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov [13] (Direktiva o opustitvenih tožbah) bi bilo treba spremeniti tako, da se v njeno prilogo vključi sklic na to direktivo ter se tako zaščiti skupne interese potrošnikov, določenih v tej direktivi.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents [14], Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
V skladu s Skupno politično izjavo z dne 28. septembra 2011 držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih [14] so se države članice zavezale, da bodo uradnemu obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos v upravičenih primerih priložile enega ali več dokumentov, v katerih bo pojasnjeno razmerje med elementi direktive in ustreznimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
With regard to this Directive, the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified.
Zakonodajalec meni, da je predložitev takšnih dokumentov v primeru te direktive upravičena.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to contribute, through the achievement of a high level of consumer protection and without restricting consumers’ access to the courts, to the proper functioning of the internal market, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, tj. z doseganjem visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov in brez omejevanja dostopa potrošnikov do sodišč prispevati k pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, in se ker se te cilje lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego navedenega cilja.
This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and specifically Articles 7, 8, 38 and 47 thereof.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznava zlasti Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah ter zlasti členi 7, 8, 38 in 47 Listine.
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [15] and delivered an opinion on 12 January 2012 [16],
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov v skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [15], ki je svoje mnenje podal 12. januarja 2012 [16] –
The purpose of this Directive is, through the achievement of a high level of consumer protection, to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by ensuring that consumers can, on a voluntary basis, submit complaints against traders to entities offering independent, impartial, transparent, effective, fast and fair alternative dispute resolution procedures.
Namen te direktive je z doseganjem visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov prispevati k pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga, in sicer z zagotavljanjem, da lahko potrošniki pritožbe proti trgovcem prostovoljno vložijo pri organih, ki ponujajo neodvisne, nepristranske, pregledne, učinkovite, hitre in pravične postopke alternativnega reševanja sporov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ARS).
This Directive is without prejudice to national legislation making participation in such procedures mandatory, provided that such legislation does not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.
Ta direktiva ne posega v nacionalno zakonodajo, na podlagi katere je sodelovanje v takih postopkih obvezno, če ta zakonodaja strankama ne preprečuje, da bi uveljavljali pravico dostopa do sodnega sistema.
This Directive shall apply to procedures for the out-of-court resolution of domestic and cross-border disputes concerning contractual obligations stemming from sales contracts or service contracts between a trader established in the Union and a consumer resident in the Union through the intervention of an ADR entity which proposes or imposes a solution or brings the parties together with the aim of facilitating an amicable solution.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za postopke izvensodnega reševanja domačih in čezmejnih sporov v zvezi s pogodbenimi obligacijskimi razmerji, ki izhajajo iz pogodb o prodaji ali pogodb o storitvah, sklenjenih med trgovcem s sedežem v Uniji in potrošnikom s prebivališčem v Uniji, in sicer s posredovanjem organa ARS, ki predlaga ali naloži rešitev ali zbliža stranki pri iskanju sporazumne rešitve.
procedures before dispute resolution entities where the natural persons in charge of dispute resolution are employed or remunerated exclusively by the individual trader, unless Member States decide to allow such procedures as ADR procedures under this Directive and the requirements set out in Chapter II, including the specific requirements of independence and transparency set out in Article 6(3), are met;
postopke pred organi za reševanje sporov, kadar so fizične osebe, odgovorne za reševanje sporov, zaposlene ali prejemajo plačilo samo pri posameznem trgovcu, razen če države članice odločijo, da bodo tovrstne postopke dovolile kot postopke ARS na podlagi te direktive, in so izpolnjene zahteve iz poglavja II, vključno s posebnimi zahtevami glede neodvisnosti in preglednosti iz člena 6(3);
procedures before consumer complaint-handling systems operated by the trader;
postopke v okviru sistemov obravnave pritožb potrošnikov, ki jih vodijo trgovci;
disputes between traders;
spore med trgovci;
direct negotiation between the consumer and the trader;
neposredna pogajanja med potrošnikom in trgovcem;
attempts made by a judge to settle a dispute in the course of a judicial proceeding concerning that dispute;
poskuse sodnika za rešitev spora med sodnim postopkom, ki poteka v zvezi s tem sporom;
procedures initiated by a trader against a consumer;
postopke, ki jih sproži trgovec proti potrošniku;
health services provided by health professionals to patients to assess, maintain or restore their state of health, including the prescription, dispensation and provision of medicinal products and medical devices;
zdravstvene storitve, ki jih za paciente opravljajo zdravstveni delavci, da bi ocenili, ohranili ali obnovili njihovo zdravstveno stanje, vključno s predpisovanjem, izdajo in zagotavljanjem zdravil in medicinskih pripomočkov;
public providers of further or higher education.
javne ponudnike nadaljnjega ali višjega izobraževanja.
This Directive establishes harmonised quality requirements for ADR entities and ADR procedures in order to ensure that, after its implementation, consumers have access to high-quality, transparent, effective and fair out-of-court redress mechanisms no matter where they reside in the Union.
Ta direktiva vzpostavlja usklajene zahteve kakovosti za organe ARS in postopke ARS, da se zagotovi, da bodo imeli potrošniki po začetku njenega izvajanja dostop do visoko kakovostnih, preglednih, učinkovitih in pravičnih mehanizmov pravnih sredstev reševanja izvensodnih pravnih sporov, ne glede na to, kje v Uniji prebivajo.
Member States may maintain or introduce rules that go beyond those laid down by this Directive, in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection.
Države članice lahko ohranijo ali sprejmejo pravila, ki presegajo določbe te direktive, da bi zagotovile visoko raven varstva potrošnikov.
This Directive acknowledges the competence of Member States to determine whether ADR entities established on their territories are to have the power to impose a solution.
Ta direktiva priznava pristojnost držav članic, da določijo, ali imajo organi ARS s sedežem na njihovem ozemlju pravico naložiti rešitev.
Relationship with other Union legal acts
Razmerje do druge pravnih aktov Unije
Save as otherwise set out in this Directive, if any provision of this Directive conflicts with a provision laid down in another Union legal act and relating to out-of-court redress procedures initiated by a consumer against a trader, the provision of this Directive shall prevail.
Če je katera koli določba te direktive v nasprotju z določbo iz drugega pravnega akta Unije in se nanaša na postopke izvensodnega reševanja pravnih sporov, ki jih sproži potrošnik proti trgovcu, prevlada določba te direktive, razen če je v tej direktivi določeno drugače.
This Directive shall be without prejudice to Directive 2008/52/EC.
Ta direktiva ne posega v Direktivo 2008/52/ES.
Article 13 of this Directive shall be without prejudice to provisions on consumer information on out-of-court redress procedures contained in other Union legal acts which shall apply in addition to that Article.
Člen 13 te direktive ne posega v določbe o obveščanju potrošnikov o postopkih izvensodnega reševanja iz drugih pravnih aktov Unije, ki se uporabljajo poleg navedenega člena.
‘consumer’ means any natural person who is acting for purposes which are outside his trade, business, craft or profession;
„potrošnik“ pomeni vsako fizično osebo, ki deluje za namene zunaj okvira svoje trgovske, poslovne, obrtne ali poklicne dejavnosti;
‘trader’ means any natural persons, or any legal person irrespective of whether privately or publicly owned, who is acting, including through any person acting in his name or on his behalf, for purposes relating to his trade, business, craft or profession;
„trgovec“ pomeni vsako fizično ali pravno osebo v zasebni ali javni lasti, ki sama ali prek osebe, ki nastopa v njenem imenu ali po njenem naročilu, deluje za namene v zvezi s svojo trgovsko, poslovno, obrtno ali poklicno dejavnostjo;
‘sales contract’ means any contract under which the trader transfers or undertakes to transfer the ownership of goods to the consumer and the consumer pays or undertakes to pay the price thereof, including any contract having as its object both goods and services;
„pogodba o prodaji“ pomeni vsako pogodbo, v skladu s katero trgovec prenese ali se zaveže, da bo prenesel lastništvo nad blagom na potrošnika, potrošnik pa plača ali se zaveže, da bo plačal ceno blaga, vključno s kakršno koli pogodbo, katere predmet so blago in storitve;