natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If sufficient funds are not available to pay the monthly payment of 83333 USD to each bioethanol production facility, each facility receives a prorate share of the funds available based upon the gallons of ethyl alcohol produced that month proportionate to all qualifying gallons of ethyl alcohol produced at all qualifying facilities.
Če za plačilo mesečnega zneska v višini 83333 USD vsakemu obratu za proizvodnjo bioetanola ni na voljo dovolj sredstev, vsak obrat prejme sorazmerni delež razpoložljivih sredstev, in sicer na podlagi števila galon proizvedenega etilnega alkohola v zadevnem mesecu glede na celotno število upravičenih galon etilnega alkohola, proizvedenega v vseh upravičenih obratih.
Each eligible facility may receive a maximum of 1 million USD per year and for all years of participation in the scheme a maximum of 9682000 USD in production payments.
Vsak upravičen obrat lahko prejme največ 1 milijon USD na leto, pri čemer plačila za spodbujanje proizvodnje in v vseh letih sodelovanja v shemi ne smejo presegati 9682000 USD.
As such the subsidies are recurring and considered to be expensed each particular year.
Vse takšne subvencije so ponavljajoče in se obravnavajo kot izdatek vsako leto posebej.
The investigation showed that two of the companies in the sample received benefits under this scheme during the IP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bile v OP dvema vzorčenima družbama zagotovljene ugodnosti v okviru te sheme.
For both companies, the subsidy amount was calculated on the basis of the amount of payments received during the IP.
Za obe družbi je bil znesek subvencije izračunan na podlagi zneska plačil, prejetih v OP.
The amount of subsidy was then allocated over the total sales of bioethanol made by the companies concerned during the IP as the appropriate denominator.
Znesek subvencije je bil nato dodeljen za celotno prodajo bioetanola, ki so jo izvedle zadevne družbe v OP, in sicer kot ustrezni imenovalec.
This calculation showed that the amount of subsidy for both companies was insignificant.
Izračun je pokazal, da je bil znesek subvencij za obe družbi zanemarljiv.
Conclusion on State Schemes
Sklep o državnih shemah
The investigation showed that two of the US State schemes identified by the complainant, i.e. the Nebraska Ethanol Production Tax Credit and South Dakota Ethanol Production Incentive, provided subsidies to bioethanol production that are financial contributions which confer a benefit to the producers in those States.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bile v okviru dveh državnih shem ZDA, ki jih je navedel pritožnik, tj. davčne olajšave na proizvodnjo etanola zvezne države Nebraska in spodbude za proizvodnjo bioetanola zvezne države Južna Dakota, zagotovljene subvencije za proizvodnjo bioetanola v obliki finančnih prispevkov, ki pomenijo ugodnost za proizvajalce v zadevnih zveznih državah.
Although the schemes seem to be specific within the States concerned, the amount of subsidies is insignificant when compared to the total production of bioethanol in the USA.
Čeprav se sheme uporabljajo znotraj navedenih zveznih držav, je število subvencij zanemarljivo v primerjavi s celotno proizvodnjo bioetanola v ZDA.
Regarding subsidies received by the companies in the sample, it was also concluded that the amount of subsidisation was insignificant.
V zvezi s subvencijami, ki so jih prejele vzorčene družbe, je bilo sklenjeno tudi, da je bil znesek subvencij zanemarljiv.
AMOUNT OF COUNTERVAILABLE SUBSIDIES DURING THE IP
ŠTEVILO SUBVENCIJ V OP, PROTI KATERIM SE LAHKO UVEDEJO IZRAVNALNI UKREPI
The investigation has shown that all investigated schemes except the one mentioned in recital (171) below, were negligible and not countervailable during the IP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bile vse preiskane sheme, razen sheme iz uvodne izjave (171), v OP zanemarljive in da proti njim ni mogoče uvesti izravnalnih ukrepov.
As mentioned in recitals (53) to (71) above, the investigation showed that the US Government provides a mixture tax credit of 0,45 USD for each gallon of bioethanol used in producing an alcohol fuel mixture which benefits ethanol blenders.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (53) do (71), je preiskava pokazala, da vlada ZDA zagotavlja davčne olajšave za mešanice goriv v višini 0,45 USD na galono bioetanola, uporabljenega pri proizvodnji alkoholne mešanice goriva, kar pomeni ugodnost za pripravljavce mešanic bioetanola.
As such the subsidy was granted on a per unit basis, i.e. by reference to the quantities of bioethanol used.
Subvencija je bila zato dodeljena na podlagi enote, tj. glede na količine uporabljenega bioetanola.
The benefit is also attached to the imported product in the Union.
Ugodnost velja tudi za uvožen izdelek v Uniji.
The amount of countervailable subsidies in accordance with the provisions of the basic Regulation is 0,45 USD per gallon.
Višina subvencij, proti katerim se lahko v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, je 0,45 USD na galono.
It is noted that the amount of subsidisation depends on the proportion, in weight, of bioethanol in the blend.
Opozoriti je treba, da je višina subvencije odvisna od deleža (mase) bioetanola v mešanici.
It is considered that the amount of subsidy is 0,45 USD per gallon on a country-wide basis as all of US produced bioethanol, including exports to the Union, ultimately benefitted from the bioethanol mixture tax credit.
Šteje se, da je višina subvencije na državni ravni 0,45 USD na galono, ker je nazadnje imela celotna proizvodnja bioetanola v ZDA, vključno z izvozom bioetanola v Unijo, ugodnosti od davčne olajšave za mešanico bioetanola.
It is therefore not necessary to differentiate between economic operators, in particular as the subsidy is rarely granted to producers of bioethanol but predominantly to traders/operators that are blending the bioethanol.
Razlikovanje med gospodarskimi subjekti zato ni potrebno, ker se subvencija v večini primerov dodeli trgovcem/upravljavcem, ki proizvajajo mešanice z bioetanolom, in le redko proizvajalcem bioetanola.
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission decided to continue the investigation without imposition of provisional measures, several parties argued that in any case, the sampled producers should be assigned individual subsidy margins, and in case they did not receive the bioethanol mixture tax credit they should be assigned a zero subsidy margin.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je Komisija sprejela odločitev o nadaljevanju preiskave brez uvedbe začasnih ukrepov, je več strani trdilo, da bi bilo treba za vzorčene proizvajalce v vsakem primeru določiti individualne stopnje subvencije in ničelno stopnjo subvencije, če ti proizvajalci niso prejeli davčne olajšave za mešanice bioetanola.
Pursuant to Article 15 of the basic Regulation, any regulation imposing the duty shall either specify the duty for individual suppliers or the supplying country concerned.
V skladu s členom 15 osnovne uredbe se v vsaki uredbi o uvedbi dajatve navedejo dajatve za posamezne dobavitelje ali zadevne države dobaviteljice.
In this case it was found that the structure of the bioethanol industry and the way the subsidies were granted, in particular the Bioethanol Mixture Tax Credit, any individual subsidy margins would not be representative and would not reflect the actual situation on the bioethanol market, in particular for the export.
V tem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da zaradi strukture industrije bioetanola in načina dodeljevanja subvencij, zlasti davčne olajšave za mešanice bioetanola, individualne stopnje subvencije ne bi bile reprezentativne in ne bi odražale dejanskega stanja na trgu bioetanola, zlasti v zvezi z izvozom.
It is clear from the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and GATT Article VI:3 that the purpose of any measures is to offset the effect of the subsidised imports.
Iz sporazuma STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih ter člena VI(3) Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT) je razvidno, da je namen morebitnih ukrepov izravnati učinek subvencioniranega uvoza.
In the present case the evidence found in the investigation showed that all US exports of bioethanol were subsidised by a maximum amount of USD 0,45 per gallon during the IP.
V tem primeru so dokazi, ugotovljeni v okviru preiskave, pokazali, da je bil celoten izvoz bioetanola iz ZDA v OP subvencioniran v znesku največ 0,45 USD na galono.
It is noted that at a point in the investigation it became clear that any sample was not representative due in particular to the nature of subsidisation in the present case.
Opozoriti je treba, da je v nekem trenutku v preiskavi postalo jasno, da noben vzorec ne bi bil reprezentativen zlasti zaradi vrste subvencioniranja v tem primeru.
Moreover, the sampled producers did not export the product concerned to the Union.
Poleg tega vzorčeni proizvajalci zadevnega izdelka niso izvažali v Unijo.
Indeed, it was the activity of blending which triggered the credit irrespective of whether the blender is a producer or an exporter.
Olajšava se je dejansko pridobila z mešanjem, ne glede na to, ali je bil pripravljavec mešanic proizvajalec ali izvoznik.
In the present case it was established that it was predominantly the exporters who claimed the Bioethanol Mixture Tax Credit.
V tem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da so davčno olajšavo za mešanice bioetanola zahtevali večinoma izvozniki.
It was also argued that, in the alternative to assigning individual subsidy margins to the sampled companies, the Commission should provide a pass-through analysis on how the bioethanol mixture tax credit can automatically be attributed to and benefit the producers.
Izraženo je bilo tudi mnenje, da bi kot nadomestno možnost za določanje individualnih stopenj subvencije za vzorčene družbe Komisija morala izvesti analizo vpliva o tem, kako se lahko davčna olajšava za mešanice bioetanola in njene ugodnosti samodejno dodelijo proizvajalcem.
The request for a pass-through analysis appears unfounded.
Zahteva po analizi vpliva je neutemeljena.
The subsidy is only paid once and the product does not change.
Subvencija se izplača samo enkrat, pri čemer se izdelek ne spremeni.
It is the product exported to the EU, bioethanol, which is subsidised.
Subvencioniran je izdelek, ki se izvaža v EU, tj. bioetanol.
Therefore, there is no need for such analysis.
Takšna analiza zato ni potrebna.
POST IP DEVELOPMENTS
DOGAJANJE PO OP
Parties highlighted the fact that the main subsidy scheme, the mixture tax credit, which conferred countervailable subsidies to US recipients in the IP, expired in the end of 2011 and has not been reintroduced.
Strani so opozorile na dejstvo, da je glavna subvencijska shema, tj. davčna olajšava za mešanice goriv, na podlagi katere so bile v OP prejemnikom v ZDA dodeljene subvencije, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, potekla konec leta 2011 in da ni bila ponovno uvedena.
They noted that Article 15 of the basic Regulation provides that no measures shall be imposed if the subsidy or subsidies are withdrawn or when the subsidies no longer confer any benefit on the exporters concerned.
Opozorile so, da se v skladu s členom 15 osnovne uredbe ne uvedejo nobeni ukrepi, če se subvencija ali subvencije ukinejo ali če subvencije ne zagotavljajo več nobenih ugodnosti zadevnim izvoznikom.
In view of the current cessation of the main subsidy scheme identified in the IP and the fact that there are no signs that it will be introduced, these parties considered that imposition of definitive countervailing measures would not be warranted.
Glede na trenutno prenehanje glavne subvencijske sheme, določene v OP, in dejstvo, da ni nobenega dokaza, da bi bila shema ponovno uvedena, so zadevne strani menile, da uvedba dokončnih izravnalnih ukrepov ne bi bila utemeljena.
They also argued that any imposition of definitive measures would anyway go beyond what is necessary to counter the effects of the subsidisation at the time these measures would be imposed.
Trdile so tudi, da bi kakršni koli dokončni ukrepi ob njihovi uvedbi v vsakem primeru presegli okvire, ki so potrebni za izravnavo učinkov subvencioniranja.
REGISTRATION OF IMPORTS FROM THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
REGISTRACIJA UVOZA IZ ZADEVNE DRŽAVE
The complainant requested several times registration of imports of bioethanol originating in the USA with a view of retroactive collection of duties.
Pritožnik je večkrat zahteval registracijo uvoza bioetanola s poreklom iz ZDA z namenom retroaktivnega pobiranja dajatev.
The request contained sufficient evidence to justify registration in accordance with Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation.
Ta zahtevek je vseboval dovolj dokazov za utemeljitev registracije v skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission considered that, even if it had provisionally concluded that the main subsidy scheme in force during the IP had ceased, in the sense that it no longer conferred a benefit at the time provisional measures would have been imposed, there was evidence that the United States might reinstate such subsidy scheme.
Čeprav je Komisija začasno sklenila, da glavna subvencijska shema, ki je bila v veljavi v OP, ni več zagotavljala ugodnosti v času, ko bi bili uvedeni začasni ukrepi, je menila, da obstajajo dokazi, da bi lahko Združene države ponovno uvedle takšno subvencijsko shemo.
Thus, in order to preserve the European Union's rights under these special circumstances, the Commission decided to subject imports of the product concerned to registration pursuant to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation so that, eventually, measures may retroactively be levied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Da bi se torej ohranile pravice Evropske unije v teh posebnih okoliščinah, se je Komisija odločila, da bo v skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe uvedla zahtevo o registraciji uvoza zadevnega izdelka, tako da se lahko ukrepi po potrebi retroaktivno uporabijo proti navedenemu uvozu od datuma take registracije.
A Commission Regulation (EU) No 771/2012 [9] was published on 24 August 2012 to this effect.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 771/2012 v zvezi s tem je bila objavljena 24. avgusta 2012. [9]
TERMINATION OF THE ANTI-SUBSIDY PROCEEDING AND OF REGISTRATION
ZAKLJUČEK PROTISUBVENCIJSKEGA POSTOPKA IN REGISTRACIJE
The investigation established that apart from the main subsidy scheme, the mixture tax credit described in recitals (53) to (71) above, the amount of subsidisation received for all other subsidy schemes investigated were insignificant and not countervailable during the IP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bil razen glavne subvencijske sheme, tj. davčne olajšave za mešanice goriv iz uvodnih izjav (53) do (71), znesek subvencij, prejetih v zvezi z vsemi drugimi preiskanimi subvencijskimi shemami, nepomemben in da v OP proti njim ni bilo mogoče uvesti izravnalnih ukrepov.
As mentioned above in recitals (182) to (185), the investigation established that the main subsidy scheme, the mixture tax credit, expired in the end of 2011 and has not been reintroduced.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (182) do (185), je preiskava pokazala, da se je glavna subvencijska shema, tj. davčna olajšava za mešanice, iztekla konec leta 2011 in da ni bila ponovno uvedena.
The information available clearly point to the cessation of the main subsidy scheme.
Razpoložljive informacije jasno kažejo na ukinitev glavne subvencijske sheme.
Up to now, there are no signs of reinstatement of the mixture tax credit and any reinstatement of that scheme would normally require an act of the United States Congress.
Do zdaj ni bilo nobenega dokaza o ponovni uvedbi davčne olajšave za mešanice, pri čemer bi bilo treba za ponovno uvedbo takšne sheme običajno sprejeti zakon v ameriškem kongresu.
Article 15 of the basic Regulation provides that no measures shall be imposed if the subsidy or subsidies are withdrawn or it has been demonstrated that the subsidies no longer confer any benefit on the exporters concerned.
Člen 15 osnovne uredbe določa, da se ne uvedejo nobeni ukrepi, če se subvencija ali subvencije ukinejo ali če je dokazano, da subvencije ne zagotavljajo več nobenih ugodnosti zadevnim izvoznikom.
It is also noted that pursuant to Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation, there shall be immediate termination of the proceeding where it is determined that the amount of countervailable subsidies is de minimis, namely below 2 % ad valorem.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da se v skladu s členom 14(3) osnovne uredbe postopek nemudoma ustavi, če se ugotovi, da je višina subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, de minimis, in sicer manj kot 2 % ad valorem.
In view of the withdrwal of the main subsidy scheme established in the IP and the fact that the amount of subsidisation received for all other subsidy schemes investigated were below the de minimis threshold during the IP in the meaning of Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation, it is considered that imposition of definitive measures is not warranted.
Glede na ukinitev glavne subvencijske sheme, določene v OP, in dejstvo, da je bil znesek subvencioniranja, prejet v zvezi s vsemi drugimi preiskanimi subvencijskimi shemami, v OP nižji od praga de minimis v smislu člena 14(3) osnovne uredbe, se šteje, da uvedba dokončnih ukrepov ni utemeljena.
In the light of the above, it is considered that the present anti-subsidy investigation should be terminated.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da bi bilo treba to protisubvencijsko preiskavo zaključiti.
In line with the termination of this investigation the registration of imports should hereby be terminated.
V skladu z zaključkom te preiskave bi bilo treba zaključiti registracijo uvoza.
All parties were informed about the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to terminate proceeding.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o ključnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih naj bi se postopek zaključil.
They were granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Za zadevne strani je bilo določeno tudi obdobje, v katerem so lahko po tem razkritju navedle svoje pripombe.
In light of the above, the Commission therefore concludes that the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of bioethanol originating in the United States of America should be terminated without the imposition of anti-subsidy measures and that the registration of imports should likewise be terminated,
Glede na navedeno Komisija torej ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba protisubvencijski postopek za uvoz bioetanola s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike v Unijo zaključiti brez uvedbe protisubvencijskih ukrepov in da bi bilo treba registracijo uvoza prav tako zaključiti.
Objections to the termination of this anti-subsidy proceeding were raised in the Advisory committee.
Pripombe v zvezi z zaključkom tega protisubvencijskega postopka so bile predložene v svetovalnem odboru.
Consequently, in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) 597/2009, the proceeding shall stand terminated if, within one month, the Council, acting by a qualified majority, has not decided otherwise.
Zato se v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 597/2009 postopek šteje kot zaključen, če Svet v enem mesecu s kvalificirano večino ne odloči drugače.
This Decision shall then be published in the Official Journal of the European Union,
Ta sklep se nato objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
The anti-subsidy proceeding on imports of bioethanol, sometimes referred to as “fuel ethanol”, i.e. ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products (as listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), denatured or undenatured, excluding products with a water content of more than 0,3 % (m/m) measured according to the standard EN 15376, as well as ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products (as listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) contained in blends with gasoline with an ethyl alcohol content of more than 10 % (v/v) currently falling within CN codes ex22071000, ex22072000, ex22089099, ex27101211, ex27101215, ex27101221, ex27101225, ex27101231, ex27101241, ex27101245, ex27101249, ex27101251, ex27101259, ex27101270, ex27101290, ex38140010, ex38140090, ex38200000 and ex38249097 and originating in the United States of America, is hereby terminated.
Protisubvencijski postopek za uvoz bioetanola, včasih imenovanega „etanol za gorivo“, tj. etilni alkohol, proizveden iz kmetijskih proizvodov (kot so navedeni v Prilogi I k Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije), denaturiran ali nedenaturiran, brez proizvodov z vsebnostjo vode več kot 0,3 % (m/m), izmerjene v skladu s standardom EN 15376, kot tudi etilni alkohol, proizveden iz kmetijskih proizvodov (kot so navedeni v Prilogi I k Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije), vsebovan v mešanicah z bencinom z vsebnostjo etilnega alkohola več kot 10 % (v/v), s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike, trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex22071000, ex22072000, ex22089099, ex27101211, ex27101215, ex27101221, ex27101225, ex27101231, ex27101241, ex27101245, ex27101249, ex27101251, ex27101259, ex27101270, ex27101290, ex38140010, ex38140090, ex38200000 in ex38249097, se zaključi.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports carried out pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 771/2012.
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza, ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 1 Uredbe (EU) št. 771/2012.
No countervailing duty shall be collected on the imports thus registered.
Za tako registriran uvoz se izravnalna dajatev ne pobira.
Regulation (EU) No 771/2012 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (EU) št. 771/2012 se razveljavi.
OJ C 345, 25.11.2011, p. 13.
UL C 345, 25.11.2011, str. 13.
OJ C 345, 25.11.2011, p. 7.
UL C 345, 25.11.2011, str. 7.
OJ L 229, 24.08.2012, p. 20.
UL L 229, 24.8.2012, str. 20.
See US Internal Revenue Code (IRC) – sec. 40(b)(4) point E.
Glej notranji davčni zakonik ZDA (IRC) – oddelek 40(b)(4), točka E.
See www.ethanol.org – RFS (Renewable fuels standard) under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
Glej spletno stran: www.ethanol.org – RFS (standard o obnovljivih gorivih) v skladu z Zakonom o energetski neodvisnosti in varnosti (Energy Independance and Security Act) iz leta 2007.
The investigation showed that to avail the alcohol mixture credit, as defined in Sec. 40(b)(3) of the IRC in the USA it sufficed to blend neat bioethanol with as little as 0,1 % of gasoline.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je v ZDA za odobritev olajšave za mešanico alkohola, kakor je opredeljena v oddelku 40(b)(3) IRC, zadostovalo, da je mešanica čistega bioetanola vsebovala le 0,1 % bencina.
For instance (a) The information published by the American Coalition for Ethanol (ACE) on the web (b) the Energy Policy Act (EPA) of 2005, in particular P.L.
Na primer (a) informacije, ki jih je na internetu objavila Ameriška koalicija za etanol (American Coalition for Ethanol – ACE), (b) Zakon o energetski politiki (Energy Policy Act – EPA) iz leta 2005, zlasti P.L.
110-58 (c) the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-140, H.R.6) which amended and increased the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) requiring 9 billion gallons of renewable fuels use in 2008 and 13,9 billion gallons in 2011, (d) fact sheets issued by the US Department of Energy under the Clean cities actions, etc.
110–158, (c) Zakon o energetski neodvisnosti in varnosti (Energy Independance and Security Act) iz leta 2007 (P.L. 110–140, H.R.6), na podlagi katerega je bil spremenjen standard o obnovljivih gorivih (RFS), pri čemer je bila vanj vključena zahteva, da se leta 2008 porabi 9 milijard galon obnovljivih goriv, leta 2011 pa 13,9 milijard galon, (d) seznami, ki jih je v okviru ukrepov za čista mesta izdalo ameriško ministrstvo za energijo, itd.
OJ L 229, 24.8.2012, p. 20.
UL L 229, 24.8.2012, str. 20.
The investigation of subsidisation and injury covered the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011.
Preiskava subvencioniranja in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011.