natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, this challenge was based on the erroneous assumption that the Commission had calculated the underselling margin by removing the average profit of the Union industry in the IP (2,6 %) from the market price to get to the 'break-even point' (i.e. a price that would result in zero profit) and then adding the target profit onto this 'break-even point'.
Vendar pa je ta zahteva temeljila na napačni predpostavki, da je Komisija stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen izračunala tako, da je od tržne cene odštela povprečni dobiček industrije Unije v OP (2,6 %), da bi tako izračunala prag rentabilnosti (tj. ceno, ki bi predstavljala ničelni dobiček), nato pa temu pragu rentabilnosti dodala ciljni dobiček.
The Commission calculated the underselling margin by adding the target profit to the cost of production of each product type.
Komisija je stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen izračunala tako, da je stroškom proizvodnje za vsako vrsto izdelka prištela ciljni dobiček.
The methodology suggested by this interested party is flawed, because the average profit of 2,6 % was not automatically achieved on each sale of each model by all companies from which the data was used.
Metodologija, ki jo je predlagala ta zainteresirana stran je pomanjkljiva, ker povprečni dobiček v višini 2,6 % ni bil dosežen samodejno z vsako prodajo vsake vrste izdelka pri vseh družbah, od katerih so bili uporabljeni podatki.
One interested party also challenged the Commission's injury calculations.
Ena zainteresirana stran je izpodbijala tudi izračune škode Komisije.
Given that that party did not have full access to the data used by the Commission to calculate the injury margin, it attempted to calculate it on its own, based on its understanding of the price difference on the market between aluminium-zinc alloy coated and zinc coated substrate, which it had calculated at USD 50 per MT. This 'recalculation', based on incomplete data, resulted in a lower injury margin than that which the Commission had calculated and disclosed.
Glede na to, da navedena stran ni imela popolnega dostopa do podatkov, ki jih je Komisija uporabila za izračun stopnje škode, jo je poskušala izračunati sama na podlagi lastnega razumevanja cenovne razlike na trgu med substratom s prevleko iz zlitine iz aluminija in cinka ter substratom s prevleko iz cinka, katero je z izračunom določila na 50 EUR/tono. Ta „ponovni izračun“, ki je temeljil na nepopolnih podatkih, je privedel do nižje stopnje škode, kot je tisti, ki ga je izračunala in razkrila Komisija.
Their arguments were rejected because following an analysis of the full data from both the exporting producers and the Union industry, the alleged price difference could not be found.
Njihove trditve so bile zavrnjene, ker po analizi vseh podatkov proizvajalcev izvoznikov in industrije Unije domnevne razlike v ceni ni bilo mogoče dokazati.
Consequently, it should be underlined that the data which the interested party was using was incomplete and thus could not be relied upon to reproduce the Commission's injury calculations.
Zato je treba poudariti, da so bili podatki, ki jih je uporabila zainteresirana stran, nepopolni in zato niso bili zanesljivi za ponoven izračun škode Komisije.
Recitals (154) to (158) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Uvodne izjave od (154) do (158) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of OCS originating in the PRC at the level of the lower of the dumping and injury margins found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročnostjo in interesom Unije ter v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz LRK na ravni najnižjih ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
Seven companies that were not sampled cooperated with the anti-dumping investigation, but not the parallel anti-subsidy one.
Sedem družb, ki niso bile vzorčene, je sodelovalo v protidampinški preiskavi, ne pa tudi v vzporedni protisubvencijski preiskavi.
For these companies, the anti-dumping duty rate is set at zero.
Za te družbe se protidampinška dajatev uvede na stopnji nič.
In the anti-subsidy investigation, these companies will be subject to the residual duty.
V protisubvencijski preiskavi bo za te družbe veljala preostala dajatev.
In order to ensure equal treatment between any new exporting producers and the cooperating companies not included in the sample, provision should be made for the weighted average duty imposed on the latter companies to be applied to any new producers which would otherwise not be entitled to a review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, as Article 11(4) does not apply where sampling has been used.
Za zagotovitev enakega obravnavanja morebitnih novih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in sodelujočih družb, ki niso vključene v vzorec, je treba sprejeti določbe za tehtano povprečno dajatev, uvedeno za slednje družbe, ki jih je treba uporabljati za morebitne nove proizvajalce, ki sicer ne bi bili upravičeni do pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe, saj člen 11(4) ne velja, kadar se uporabi vzorčenje.
On the basis of the above, the rate at which such duties will be imposed are set as follows:
Na podlagi navedenega je stopnja, na kateri bodo uvedene dajatve, kot sledi:
Subsidy margin (%)
Stopnja subvencije (%)
Countervailing duty (%)
Izravnalna dajatev (%)
Zhangjiagang Panhua Steel Strip Co., Ltd, Chongqing Wanda Steel Strip Co., Ltd, and Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone Jiaxinda International Trade Co., Ltd.
Zhangjiagang Panhua Steel Strip Co., Ltd, Chongqing Wanda Steel Strip Co., Ltd, in Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone Jiaxinda International Trade Co., Ltd.
co-operating companies in the anti-dumping investigation (with the exception of the companies subject to the residual duty in the parallel anti-subsidy Implementing Regulation (EU) No 215/2013) [3]
sodelujoče družbe v protidampinški preiskavi (razen družb, za katere velja stopnja preostale dajatve v vzporedni protisubvencijski Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 215/2013 [3])
In these circumstances the provisional duty at the rates set out in Article 1(2) of the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected.
V teh okoliščinah je treba dokončno pobrati začasno dajatev na stopnjah iz člena 1(2) začasne uredbe.
However amounts provisionally secured for products with a substrate with a metallic coating of chromium or tin should be released,
Vendar bi bilo treba zneske, ki so začasno zavarovani za izdelke s substratom s prevleko iz kroma ali kositra, sprostiti –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of certain organic coated steel products, i.e. flat-rolled products of non-alloy and alloy steel (not including stainless steel) which are painted, varnished or coated with plastics on at least one side, excluding so-called 'sandwich panels' of a kind used for building applications and consisting of two outer metal sheets with a stabilising core of insulation material sandwiched between them, excluding those products with a final coating of zinc-dust (a zinc-rich paint, containing by weight 70 % or more of zinc), and excluding those products with a substrate with a metallic coating of chromium or tin, currently falling within CN codes ex72107080, ex72124080, ex72259900, ex72269970 (TARIC codes 7210708011, 7210708091, 7212408001, 7212408021, 7212408091, 7225990011, 7225990091, 7226997011 and 7226997091), and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, tj. ploščato valjane izdelke iz nelegiranega in legiranega jekla (nerjavno jeklo ni vključeno), ki so pobarvani, lakirani ali prevlečeni s plastično maso na vsaj eni strani, z izjemo „sendvič plošč“, ki se uporabljajo v gradbeništvu in so sestavljene iz dveh zunanjih kovinskih plošč s stabilizacijskim jedrom iz izolacijskega materiala, stisnjenega med njiju, z izjemo izdelkov s končnim premazom iz cinkovega prahu (cinkova barva, ki vsebuje 70 mas. % cinka ali več), in z izjemo izdelkov s substratom s prevleko iz kroma ali kositra, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex72107080, ex72124080, ex72259900 in ex72269970 (oznake TARIC 7210708011, 7210708091, 7212408001, 7212408021, 7212408091, 7225990011, 7225990091, 7226997011 in 7226997091), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Anyang Iron Steel Co., Ltd.
Anyang Iron Steel Co.,Ltd.
Amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 845/2012 shall be definitively collected at the rate set in Article 1 of that Regulation.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 845/2012, se dokončno poberejo na stopnji začasne dajatve, ki jo uvaja člen 1 navedene uredbe.
However, amounts provisionally secured for products with a substrate with a metallic coating of chromium or tin should be released.
Vendar se zneski, ki so začasno zavarovani za izdelke s substratom s prevleko iz kroma ali kositra, sprostijo.
OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 33.
UL L 252, 19.9.2012, str. 33.
See page 16 of this Official Journal
Glej stran 16 tega uradnega lista
Production decreased sharply in 2009, partially recovering in 2010 and remaining stable in the IP but still below 2008 levels.
Proizvodnja se je leta 2009 močno zmanjšala, nato se je leta 2010 delno izboljšala in ostala stabilna v OP, vendar še vedno pod ravnjo iz leta 2008.
Production capacity remained constant during the period considered while capacity utilisation declined, following the trend of production.
Proizvodna zmogljivost je v obravnavanem obdobju ostala nespremenjena, medtem ko se je izkoriščenost zmogljivosti zmanjšala in se razvijala enako kot proizvodnja.
Following the publication of the provisional Regulation two parties came forward and claimed that more recent data are more relevant to the determination of injury and that the Commission should not have taken 2008 as the starting point of the injury analysis, but rather should have used 2009.
Po objavi začasne uredbe sta dve strani trdili, da so novejši podatki pomembnejši za določitev škode in da Komisija ne bi smela uporabiti leta 2008 kot izhodišče za analizo škode, temveč bi morala uporabiti leto 2009.
They stated that WTO case law has made the point that more recent data are more relevant to the determination of injury than historical data, and that the outcome of an end-point to end-point comparison very much depends on which years are used, as a one-year shift can show a different result.
Navedli sta, da je sodna praksa STO, da so novejši podatki pomembnejši za določitev škode od starejših podatkov in da je rezultat primerjave končnih točk močno odvisen od let, ki so bila uporabljena, saj lahko enoletni premik pokaže drugačen rezultat.
Interested parties also pointed to the fact that import volumes from the PRC were at their lowest in 2009 rather than in 2008.
Zainteresirane strani so opozorile tudi na dejstvo, da je bil obseg uvoza iz LRK najmanjši leta 2009 in ne leta 2008.
However, given that the Union industry was not profitable in 2009, it is impossible to use 2009 data to set a target profit for the Union industry.
Vendar glede na to, da industrija Unije leta 2009 ni bila donosna, za določitev ciljnega dobička za industrijo Unije ni mogoče uporabiti podatke za leto 2009.
CISA then proposed that the target profit for sales of OCS to unrelated parties in the Union be based on the average overall profit for the multinational corporation ArcelorMittal for the years 2010 and 2011.
Kitajsko združenje za železo in jeklo je nato predlagalo, da naj ciljni dobiček iz prodaje jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, nepovezanim stranem v Uniji temelji na povprečnem skupnem dobičku multinacionalne družbe ArcelorMittal za leti 2010 in 2011.
This was rejected as a reliable source for the profit on OCS in the Union in the absence of dumped imports, because taking the profit of the entire worldwide ArcelorMittal group is clearly not representative of profit on sales of OCS in the Union.
To je bilo zavrnjeno kot zanesljiv vir dobička od prodaje jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, v Uniji v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza, saj skupni dobiček svetovne skupine ArcelorMittal očitno ni reprezentativen za dobiček od prodaje jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, v Uniji.
Where any producer from the People's Republic of China provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that it did not export the goods described in Article 1(1) originating in the People's Republic of China during the period of investigation (1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011); that it is not related to an exporter or producer subject to the measures imposed by this Regulation; and that it has either actually exported the goods concerned or has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Union after the end of the period of investigation, the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal by the Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amend Article 1(2) in order to attribute to that producer the duty applicable to cooperating producers not in the sample.
Kadar kateri koli proizvajalec iz Ljudske republike Kitajske Komisiji predloži dovolj dokazov, da v obdobju preiskave, to je od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011, ni izvažal blaga iz člena 1(1) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, da ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, ki jih uvaja ta uredba, ter da je zadevno blago dejansko izvažal ali je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da bo po koncu obdobja preiskave izvozil precejšnjo količino v Unijo, lahko Svet z navadno večino in na predlog Komisije ter po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom spremeni člen 1(2), da navedenemu proizvajalcu dodeli dajatev, ki velja za sodelujoče nevzorčene proizvajalce.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 215/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 215/2013
imposing a countervailing duty on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi izravnalne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], and in particular Article 17 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], zlasti člena 15 Uredbe,
On 22 February 2012, the European Commission ("Commission") announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] ('Notice of initiation'), the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of certain organic coated steel products originating in the People's Republic of China ('PRC' or the 'country concerned').
Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 22. februarja 2012 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“) v Unijo.
The anti-subsidy proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 9 January 2012 by EUROFER ('the complainant') on behalf of producers representing in this case more than 70 % of the total Union production of certain organic coated steel products.
Protisubvencijski postopek je bil uveden na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 9. januarja 2012 vložil EUROFER („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki v tem primeru predstavljajo več kot 70 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, v Uniji.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of subsidisation of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o subvencioniranju tega izdelka in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka.
Prior to the initiation of the proceeding and in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the Government of the PRC ('the GOC') that it had received a properly documented complaint alleging that subsidised imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the PRC were causing material injury to the Union industry.
Pred začetkom postopka in v skladu s členom 10(7) osnovne uredbe je Komisija vlado LRK („kitajska vlada“) obvestila, da je prejela pravilno dokumentirano pritožbo, ki zatrjuje, da subvencionirani uvoz nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz LRK povzroča znatno škodo industriji Unije.
However, due note was taken of comments made by the authorities of the GOC in regard to the allegations contained in the complaint regarding the lack of countervailability of the schemes.
Vendar so se ustrezno upoštevale pripombe pristojnih organov kitajske vlade glede trditev iz pritožbe, da se sheme, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, ne uporabljajo.
On 21 December 2011, the European Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain organic coated steel products originating in the PRC.
Evropska komisija je 21. decembra 2011 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo.
On 20 September 2012, the Commission, by Regulation (EU) No 845/2012 [4], imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 20. septembra 2012 z Uredbo (EU) št. 845/2012 [4] uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz LRK.
The injury analyses performed in this anti-subsidy and the parallel anti-dumping investigation are identical, since the definition of the Union industry, the representative Union producers and the investigation period are the same in both investigations.
Analizi škode, izvedeni v tej protisubvencijski in vzporedni protidampinški preiskavi, sta identični, saj so opredelitev industrije Unije, reprezentativni proizvajalci Unije in obdobje preiskave v obeh preiskavah enaki.
Initially 19 Chinese exporting producers/groups of producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Na začetku je 19 kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov / skupin proizvajalcev zagotovilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from the exporting producers and in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation the Commission initially proposed a sample of 3 exporting producers/groups of exporting producers.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci izvozniki in v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej predlagala vzorec treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov / skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
However one of the exporting producers included in this sample withdrew its cooperation.
Vendar je eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključenih v ta vzorec, prekinil svoje sodelovanje.
Consequently it was replaced with the next exporting producer with the highest volume of exports sales to the Union.
Zato ga je nadomestil proizvajalec izvoznik z naslednjim največjim obsegom izvoza v Unijo.
Following the notification also this exporting producer withdrew its cooperation.
Po obvestilu je tudi ta proizvajalec izvoznik prekinil svoje sodelovanje.
In order not to cause any further delay to the proceeding it was decided to limit the sample to two groups of exporting producers, which had the highest export volume to the Union, i.e. Zhangjiagang Panhua Steel Strip Co., Ltd and its related companies and Zhejiang Huadong Light Steel Building Material Co., Ltd and its related companies.
Da ne bi povzročili nadaljnje zamude v postopku, je bila sprejeta odločitev o omejitvi vzorca na dve skupini proizvajalcev izvoznikov z največjim obsegom izvoza v Unijo, to sta Zhangjiagang Panhua Steel Strip Co., Ltd in njene povezane družbe ter Zhejiang Huadong Light Steel Building Material Co., Ltd in njene povezane družbe.
The sample of these two groups of exporting producers serves as the basis to determine the level of subsidisation for those groups as well as the level of subsidisation for all cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample, as required by Articles 15.2 and 15.3 of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi vzorca teh dveh skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov se določi raven subvencioniranja za navedeni skupini in tudi za vse sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso vključeni v vzorec, kot je določeno v členu 15(2) in (3) osnovne uredbe.
This sample consisted of six Union producers that were known to the Commission to produce the like product selected on the basis of sales, production volume, size and geographical location in the Union.
Ta vzorec je sestavljalo šest proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili Komisiji znani, da proizvajajo podoben izdelek, izbran na podlagi prodaje, obsega proizvodnje, velikosti in geografske lege v Uniji.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the representatives of the PRC, the two sampled exporting producers in the PRC, 14 other exporting producers in the PRC that requested so, the six sampled Union producers, the five cooperating importers in the Union and to the known users.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala predstavnikom LRK, dvema vzorčenima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma v LRK, 14 drugim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK, ki so to zahtevali, šestim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, petim sodelujočim uvoznikom v Uniji in znanim uporabnikom.
Replies were received from the representatives of the PRC, nine exporting producers and related companies in the PRC, the six sampled Union producers, two unrelated importers and ten users.
Odgovore so poslali predstavniki LRK, devet proizvajalcev izvoznikov in povezanih družb v LRK, šest vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, dva nepovezana uvoznika in deset uporabnikov.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following State authority and companies:
Preveritveni obiski so potekali v prostorih naslednjega državnega organa in družb:
Government of the People Republic of China
Vlada Ljudske republike Kitajske
Groups of Exporting producers (and related companies) in the PRC
Skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov (in povezane družbe) v LRK
Zhangjiagang Panhua Steel Strip Co., Ltd and its related companies:
Zhangjiagang Panhua Steel Strip Co., Ltd, in njene povezane družbe:
Chongqing Wanda Steel Strip Co., Ltd, Zhangjiagang Wanda Steel Strip Co., Ltd, Jiangsu Huasheng New Construction Materials Co. Ltd and Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone Jiaxinda International Trade Co., Ltd;
Chongqing Wanda Steel Strip Co., Ltd, Zhangjiagang Wanda Steel Strip Co., Ltd, Jiangsu Huasheng New Construction Materials Co. Ltd in Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone Jiaxinda International Trade Co., Ltd,
Macrometal, Hamburg, Germany
Macrometal, Hamburg, Nemčija.
Subsequently all parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive countervailing duties on imports of certain organic coated steel products originating in the PRC ('the final disclosure').
Nato so bile vse zainteresirane strani obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala predlagati uvedba dokončnih izravnalnih dajatev na uvoz nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („končno razkritje“).