natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission analysed the data in the complaint and contacted all known Union producers and asked them to also provide data on production as well as their position with regards the complaint and to assist the Commission in the identification of other potential producers, if any.
Komisija je preučila podatke iz pritožbe ter stopila v stik z vsemi znanimi proizvajalci Unije in jih pozvala, naj predložijo podatke o proizvodnji in svoje stališče o pritožbi ter Komisiji pomagajo pri opredelitvi morebitnih drugih proizvajalcev.
Associations of producers provided information on production as well.
Informacije o proizvodnji so predložila tudi združenja proizvajalcev.
In respect of this claim it is further noted that the data source and methodology for the Union production figure used for each of the years of the period considered was also explained in recital (107) of the provisional Regulation, i.e. in line with what had been done at the complaint stage, it is based on data provided by the European and national associations, cross-checked with data provided by individual producers and also with other statistical sources (in particular, PRODCOM).
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba tudi opozoriti, da sta bila vir podatkov in metodologija za izračun proizvodnje Unijo za vsako leto obravnavanega obdobja pojasnjena v uvodni izjavi (107) začasne uredbe, tj. v skladu s postopkom v fazi pritožbe podatek o proizvodnji Unije temelji na podatkih, ki so jih predložila evropska in nacionalna združenja in so bili navzkrižno preverjeni s podatki, ki so jih predložili posamezni proizvajalci, ter drugimi statističnimi viri (zlasti PRODCOM).
As explained by the complainants during the investigation, the data provided by a European association had, as concerns porcelain products, been based on PRODCOM data for porcelain tableware and kitchenware as the PRODCOM code for this product matched with the porcelain products covered by this investigation.
Kot so pojasnili pritožniki med preiskavo, so podatki za porcelanaste izdelke, ki jih je predložilo evropsko združenje, temeljili na podatkih PRODCOM za porcelanasto namizno in kuhinjsko posodo, ker se je oznaka PRODCOM za ta izdelek ujemala s porcelanastimi izdelki, ki jih zajema ta preiskava.
As concerns non-porcelain products, PRODCOM could not be used at it covered many more manufactured products than the non-porcelain products covered by this investigation.
Kar zadeva neporcelanaste izdelke, podatkov PRODCOM ni bilo mogoče uporabiti, ker so zajemali veliko več kot neporcelanaste izdelke, zajete v tej preiskavi.
Therefore, for these products, the national associations had collected the relevant data based on their in-depth knowledge of their respective markets and this information had been cross-checked by the European association before providing the total figures to the Commission.
Zato so za te izdelke nacionalna združenja na podlagi poglobljenega poznavanja posameznih trgov zbrala ustrezne podatke, evropsko združenje pa jih je navzkrižno preverilo, preden je seštevke predložilo Komisiji.
Those figures were updated during the investigation.
Navedeni podatki so bili med preiskavo posodobljeni.
Moreover, a list of all known producers was contained in the non-confidential file and the Commission's attention was only drawn to the existence of an additional three producers in Romania.
Poleg tega je bil seznam vseh znanih proizvajalcev del nezaupne dokumentacije, Komisija pa je bila obveščena le o obstoju dodatnih treh proizvajalcev v Romuniji.
The disparity between the PRODCOM statistics and the 240200 figure derives from the fact that the product scope of this investigation does not match with the PRODCOM statistical data codes as concerns non-porcelain products, i.e. it is much narrower.
Neskladje med statističnimi podatki PRODCOM in podatkom o 240200 tonah izhaja iz dejstva, da se obseg izdelka v tej preiskavi ne ujema z oznakami statistične nomenklature PRODCOM za neporcelanaste izdelke, saj je veliko ožji.
In the case of EUROSTAT import statistics, this difference could indeed be accounted for by making a 20 % downward adjustment, but this was not appropriate in the case of the EU production figures reported in the PRODCOM database.
Kar zadeva statistične podatke Eurostata o uvozu, bi se ta razlika dejansko lahko upoštevala s prilagoditvijo za 20 % navzdol, vendar to pri podatkih o proizvodnji EU iz podatkovne zbirke PRODCOM ni bilo primerno.
In particular the PRODCOM figures of two Member States would appear to be grossly overstated if the same methodology were applied.
Podatki PRODCOM za dve državi članici bi bili pri uporabi iste metodologije na primer znatno precenjeni.
Therefore, the methodology used by the parties concerned and referred to in recital (99) above is flawed.
Zato je metodologija iz uvodne izjave (99), ki so jo uporabile strani, pomanjkljiva.
Moreover, no evidence was provided that the production as reported by any of the Member States, including the two Member States referred to above, and included in the non-confidential file would be understated.
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazov, da bi bili podatki o proizvodnji, ki so jih predložile države članice EU, vključno z navedenima državama članicama, in so bili vključeni v nezaupno dokumentacijo, podcenjeni.
It should also be noted that for some Member States the data provided by the European association and used in this investigation was significantly higher than if adjusted PRODCOM data had been used.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so bili podatki za nekatere države članice, ki jih je predložilo evropsko združenje in so bili uporabljeni v tej preiskavi, bistveno večji, kot če bili uporabljeni prilagojeni podatki PRODCOM.
In view of the above, there is no reason to doubt the production figures reported in this investigation and the result of the examination of standing.
Glede na navedeno ni razloga za dvom glede podatkov o proizvodnji iz te preiskave in rezultata preverjanja reprezentativnosti.
In the absence of any further comments, recitals (107) and (108) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi (107) in (108) začasne uredbe potrdita.
In a joint submission several importers contested the Union consumption figures provided in recital (110) of the provisional Regulation.
V skupnem stališču je več uvoznikov izpodbijalo podatke o potrošnji Unije iz uvodne izjave (110) začasne uredbe.
This claim was based on the erroneous use of PRODCOM statistical data for Union production and sales, as explained under point 4.2 above and is therefore dismissed.
Ta zahtevek se zavrne, ker temelji na napačni uporabi statističnih podatkov PRODCOM za proizvodnjo in prodajo Unije, kot je pojasnjeno v točki 4.2.
However, whilst checking the Eurostat import statistics again, it was found that they had been updated since the imposition of provisional measures which had resulted in some minor changes.
Vendar je bilo pri ponovnem preverjanju statističnih podatkov Eurostata o uvozu ugotovljeno, da so bili podatki po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov posodobljeni, zato je prišlo do nekaj manjših sprememb.
Therefore, for the sake of completeness, on the basis of these updated Eurostat import statistics and submissions regarding Union industry sales on the Union market, the Union consumption developed as follows:
Na podlagi teh posodobljenih statističnih podatkov Eurostata o uvozu ter stališč v zvezi s prodajo industrije Unije na trgu Unije so bili podatki zaradi popolnosti popravljeni, potrošnja Unije pa je bila naslednja:
In the absence of any further comments, recitals (109) and (111) to (112) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave (109), (111) in (112) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In a joint submission several importers contested the figures provided in recital (113) of the provisional Regulation.
V skupnem stališču je več uvoznikov izpodbijalo podatke iz uvodne izjave (113) začasne uredbe.
This claim was based on the erroneous use of PRODCOM statistical data and is therefore dismissed.
Ta zahtevek temelji na napačni uporabi statističnih podatkov PRODCOM in se zato zavrne.
On the basis of the updated Eurostat import statistics (see recital (106) above), the volume, market share and average prices of imports of the product concerned developed as set out below:
Na podlagi posodobljenih statističnih podatkov Eurostata o uvozu (glej uvodno izjavo (106)) so bili obseg, tržni delež in povprečne cene uvoza zadevnega izdelka naslednji:
The updated volumes, values and trends are almost identical to those analysed in the provisional Regulation.
Posodobljeni podatki o obsegu, vrednostih in gibanjih so skoraj enaki podatkom, analiziranim v začasni uredbi.
The market share of Chinese imports increased from 64,8 % in 2008 to 66,8 % in the IP.
Tržni delež uvoza s Kitajske se je s 64,8 % leta 2008 povečal na 66,8 % v OP.
The import price increased by almost 18 % during the period considered, from 1274 EUR/tonne to 1498 EUR/tonne.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je uvozna cena povečala za skoraj 18 %, in sicer s 1274 EUR/tono na 1498 EUR/tono.
One party alleged a complete lack of correlation between the prices and volumes of Chinese imports.
Ena od strani je trdila, da med cenami in obsegom uvoza s Kitajske ni nobene povezave.
In this respect, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the basic Regulation, consideration shall be given to whether there has been a significant increase in dumped imports, either in absolute terms or relative to production or consumption in the Union.
V zvezi s tem se v skladu s členom 3(3) osnovne uredbe preuči, ali je prišlo do znatnega povečanja dampinškega uvoza, bodisi v absolutnem smislu bodisi relativno glede na proizvodnjo ali potrošnjo v Uniji.
With regard to the effect of the dumped imports on prices, consideration shall be given to whether there has been significant price undercutting by the dumped imports as compared with the price of a like product of the Union industry, or whether the effect of such imports is otherwise to depress prices to a significant degree or prevent price increases, which would otherwise have occurred, to a significant degree.
V zvezi z učinkom dampinškega uvoza na cene se preuči, ali je v primerjavi s ceno podobnega izdelka industrije Unije zaradi dampinškega uvoza prišlo do znatnega nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen oziroma ali je tak uvoz kako drugače povzročil znaten padec cen ali preprečil zvišanje cen, do katerega bi sicer prišlo.
None of these factors in themselves give sufficient decisive guidance.
Nobeden od teh dejavnikov ni sam po sebi odločilnega pomena.
Within the above context, the following should be noted.
V navedenem okviru je treba opozoriti na naslednje.
Firstly, at the time when Union consumption recovered (2009-2010), there was a significant price increase of Chinese imports – which would suggest that there is a correlation.
V času, ko je potrošnja Unije spet narasla (2009–2010), so se cene uvoza s Kitajske znatno povečale, kar kaže, da obstaja povezava.
But more importantly, the development of Chinese prices during the period considered should be assessed in the context of the very significant price difference which already existed in 2008 and which is illustrated by the average Chinese imports prices (table 2) and the average Union sales prices (table 9) reported in the provisional Regulation.
Še zlasti pa bi bilo treba gibanje cen uvoza iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju preučiti v okviru zelo velike cenovne razlike, ki je obstajala že leta 2008 in jo ponazarjajo povprečne uvozne cene iz LRK (preglednica 2) in povprečne prodajne cene Unije (preglednica 9) iz začasne uredbe.
These high price differences are confirmed by the high levels of undercutting during the IP.
Visoke stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen med OP potrjujejo te velike cenovne razlike.
The price increase, consequently, did not prevent Chinese imports from gaining market share over the period considered.
Porast cen zato ni preprečil povečanja tržnega deleža uvoza iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju.
Indeed, these imports continued to exert a severe pressure on prices of the Union industry which went down by 12 % over the period considered.
Dejansko je ta uvoz še naprej povzročal hud pritisk na cene industrije Unije, ki so se v obravnavanem obdobju znižale za 12 %.
This comment, therefore, cannot be accepted.
Zato te pripombe ni mogoče sprejeti.
As regards the evolution of import price (increasing) and import volume (decreasing) from 2008 to 2011 and then 2012 brought forward by one sampled group of Chinese exporting producers, the observed trend of increasing average import prices cannot undermine the finding of injurious dumping during the IP.
Kar zadeva gibanje uvozne cene (povečanje) in obseg uvoza (upad) med letoma 2008 in 2011 ter leta 2012, ki ga je izpostavila vzorčena skupina kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, zabeleženo povečanje povprečne uvozne cene ne more omajati ugotovitve glede škodljivega dampinga v OP.
As concerns the development of Chinese import volumes, and as already highlighted in recital (114) of the provisional Regulation and again in recital (109) above, the market share indicator shows an increase in market share of Chinese imports by 2 percentage points.
Kar zadeva gibanje obsega uvoza iz LRK, kot je bilo že poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi (114) začasne uredbe in v uvodni izjavi (109) zgoraj, kazalnik tržnega deleža kaže na povečanje tržnega deleža uvoza iz LRK za 2 odstotni točki.
Moreover, and as explained in more detail in recitals (116) and (117) of the provisional Regulation and in recital (111) above, there was important price undercutting by the Chinese imports.
Poleg tega, kot je bilo podrobneje pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (116) in (117) začasne uredbe in v uvodni izjavi (111) zgoraj, je uvoz iz LRK povzročil znatno nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen.
Following provisional disclosure, several interested parties requested more details on the price undercutting calculations than those already provided in recital (116) of the provisional Regulation.
Po začasnem razkritju so številne zainteresirane strani zahtevale več podrobnosti o izračunu nelojalnega nižanja cen poleg tistih iz uvodne izjave (116) začasne uredbe.
Insofar as the sensitive nature of this information and the fact that the Union producers had been granted anonymity would allow it, additional information was provided.
Dodatne informacije so bile predložene, kolikor sta to dopuščala občutljiva narava teh informacij in dejstvo, da je bila proizvajalcem Unije zagotovljena anonimnost.
By analogy to the decision made after the imposition of provisional measures to exclude from the export listings some ‘atypical’ products for the purpose of calculating dumping (see recital (69) above), these products were also excluded from the export listings used for the injury calculations.
Po analogiji z odločitvijo, sprejeto po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov, o izključitvi nekaterih „netipičnih“ izdelkov iz izvoznih seznamov za izračun dampinga (glej uvodno izjavo (69)) so bili ti izdelki prav tako izključeni iz izvoznih seznamov, ki se uporabljajo za izračun škode.
This change had only a minor effect on the undercutting margins, which remained therefore in the same range as mentioned in recital (117) of the provisional Regulation.
Ta sprememba je imela le majhen učinek na stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen, ki so zato ostale na isti višini, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (117) začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any further comments, recitals (113) to (117) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od (113) do (117) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Several parties stated that the fact that several injury factors improved between 2009 or 2010 and the IP demonstrates that the Union industry was developing positively.
Več strani je navedlo, da se industrija Unije razvija pozitivno, ker so se številni dejavniki škode med letom 2009 ali 2010 in OP izboljšali.
However, it should be noted that this analysis is incomplete and that it disregards the evolution of those factors during the whole period considered.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da je ta analiza nepopolna in da ne upošteva razvoja navedenih dejavnikov v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
The explanations given in recital (23) of the provisional Regulation are also to be taken into consideration in this respect.
V zvezi s tem je treba upoštevati tudi pojasnila v uvodni izjavi (23) začasne uredbe.
Upon request by an interested party, it is confirmed that the macroeconomic indicators were assessed at the level of the whole Union industry, while the microeconomic ones were analysed at the level of the sampled Union producers, which included non-complaining companies.
Na zahtevo zainteresirane strani se potrdi, da so bili makroekonomski kazalniki ocenjeni na ravni celotne industrije Unije, mikroekonomski kazalniki pa so bili analizirani na ravni vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, vključno z družbami, ki se niso pritožile.
CCCLA submitted that the micro- and macro-economic indicators presented in the provisional Regulation were not representative as the total production in the Union would be much higher than the figures used in this investigation.
CCCLA je navedla, da mikro- in makroekonomski kazalniki, predstavljeni v začasni uredbi, niso bili reprezentativni, saj naj bi skupna proizvodnja v Uniji znatno presegala številke, uporabljene v tej preiskavi.
However, in view of the analysis and conclusions reached under point 4.2 above, this argument is rejected.
Vendar se glede na analizo in sklepe iz točke 4.2 ta trditev zavrne.
In the absence of any further comments, recitals (118) to (121) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od (118) do (121) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
As mentioned in section 4.1 above, several importers contested the production figures provided in recital (122) of the provisional Regulation.
Kakor je navedeno v oddelku 4.1, je več uvoznikov izpodbijalo podatke o proizvodnji iz uvodne izjave (122) začasne uredbe.
However, these figures have been cross-checked and are confirmed.
Vendar so bili ti podatki navzkrižno preverjeni in se potrdijo.
In the absence of any further comments, recitals (122) to (124) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od (122) do (124) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The update in Table 2 has no impact on Tables 4 and 5 of the provisional Regulation.
Posodobitev iz preglednice 2 ne vpliva na preglednici 4 in 5 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of relevant comments regarding sales volumes and market share, recitals (125) and (126) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z obsegom prodaje in tržnim deležem, se uvodni izjavi (125) in (126) začasne uredbe potrdita.
In a joint submission several importers contested the employment and productivity figures provided in recitals (127) and (128) of the provisional Regulation, alleging that they were not in line with the picture depicted by certain Eurostat statistics [8].
V skupnem stališču je več uvoznikov izpodbijalo podatke o zaposlenosti in produktivnosti iz uvodnih izjav (127) in (128) začasne uredbe in sicer z navedbo, da niso v skladu s sliko, ki jo dajejo nekateri statistični podatki Eurostata [8].
However, the figures for both indicators were cross-checked and deemed accurate.
Vendar so bili podatki za oba kazalnika navzkrižno preverjeni, pri čemer je bilo ugotovljeno, da so točni.
The figures brought forward by the parties were too broad and not related to the production of the like product.
Podatki, ki so jih navedle strani, so bili preobsežni in niso bili povezani s proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka.
In the absence of any further comments regarding employment and productivity, recitals (127) to (128) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z zaposlenostjo in produktivnostjo ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi (127) in (128) začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of any comments regarding the magnitude of the dumping margin, recital (129) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede višine stopnje dampinga, se uvodna izjava (129) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In a joint submission several importers contested the stock figures provided in recital (130) of the provisional Regulation and their relevance as compared to publicly available data regarding certain Union producers.
V skupnem stališču je več uvoznikov izpodbijalo podatke o zalogah iz uvodne izjave (130) začasne uredbe in njihovo relevantnost v primerjavi z javno razpoložljivimi podatki o nekaterih proizvajalcih Unije.
They also disagreed with the statement that the Union industry essentially works to order.
Prav tako se niso strinjali s trditvijo, da industrija Unije v osnovi posluje na podlagi naročil.
As regards working to order, the investigation confirmed that that was indeed the case for sampled Union producers and that this is a normal practice in the sector.
Kar zadeva poslovanje na podlagi naročil, je preiskava potrdila, da to drži za vzorčene proizvajalce Unije in da je to običajna praksa v tem sektorju.
Moreover, the stock figures provided in the provisional Regulation concerned the verified stock figure from the sampled Union producers which is considered the most reliable figure.
Poleg tega se podatki o zalogah iz začasne uredbe nanašajo na preverjeni podatek o zalogah vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, ki velja za najbolj zanesljivega.
After final disclosure the above comments were reiterated, however, no new arguments were brought forward.
Po dokončnem razkritju so bile navedene pripombe ponovljene, novi argumenti pa niso bili predstavljeni.
In the absence of any further comments regarding stocks, recital (130) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z zalogami, se uvodna izjava (130) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments regarding the sales prices figures as given in the provisional Regulation, recital (131) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede podatkov o prodajnih cenah iz začasne uredbe, se uvodna izjava (131) začasne uredbe potrdi.
Profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investment, ability to raise capital and wages
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb, zmožnost zbiranja kapitala in plače
After disclosure, a clerical error was discovered in the calculation of the net profit of the Union industry and the return on investment (ROI).
Po razkritju je bila odkrita stvarna napaka pri izračunu neto dobička industrije Unije in donosnosti naložb.
This error was corrected and the revised figures are as follows:
Ta napaka je bila odpravljena in popravljeni podatki so:
The above correction does not materially affect the provisional findings as regards those two indicators.
Zgoraj navedeni popravek ne vpliva bistveno na začasne ugotovitve glede teh dveh kazalnikov.
However, the weighted average profit level of the sampled producers was, during the period considered, slightly lower as provisionally established as it went down from 3,8 % to 3,2 % (instead of from 4,2 % to 3,5 %).
Vendar je bila tehtana povprečna stopnja dobička vzorčenih proizvajalcev v obravnavanem obdobju nekoliko nižja, kot je bilo začasno ugotovljeno, saj se je s 3,8 % zmanjšala na 3,2 % (in ne s 4,2 % na 3,5 %).
Return on investment largely followed the trend observed for profit, but, as also indicated by several interested parties after final disclosure, over the period considered it developed largely positively instead of negatively.
Donosnost naložb je v veliki meri sledila gibanjem dobička, vendar se je ta, kot je po dokončnem razkritju opozorilo več zainteresiranih strani, v obravnavanem obdobjugibala večinoma pozitivno in ne negativno.
One interested party questioned the fragile state of the Union industry at the beginning of the period considered, as mentioned in recital (134) of the provisional Regulation.
Ena zainteresirana stran je podvomila v ranljiv položaj industrije Unije na začetku obravnavanega obdobja, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (134) začasne uredbe.
It was found that it could not.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se ne more.