natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by rating entities where the credit rating agency itself or any person holding, directly or indirectly, at least 5 % of either the capital or the voting rights of the credit rating agency, or being otherwise in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of the credit rating agency, provides consultancy or advisory services to that rated entity or a related third party regarding the corporate or legal structure, assets, liabilities or activities of that rated entity or related third party.’;
Bonitetna agencija niti katera koli oseba, ki ima neposredno ali posredno najmanj 5 % bodisi kapitala ali glasovalnih pravic v bonitetni agenciji ali ki lahko drugače izvršuje pomemben vpliv na poslovne dejavnosti bonitetne agencije, prekrši člen 6(2) v povezavi s prvim odstavkom točke 4 oddelka B Priloge I, če zagotavlja posvetovalne ali svetovalne storitve ocenjevanemu subjektu ali povezani tretji osebi glede podjetniške ali pravne strukture, sredstev, obveznosti ali dejavnosti tega ocenjevanega subjekta ali povezane tretje osebe.“;
The credit rating agency infringes Article 6a(1) when one of its shareholders or members holding at least 5 % of the capital or the voting rights in that credit rating agency or in a company which has the power to exercise control or a dominant influence over that credit rating agency, is in breach of one of the prohibitions set out in points (a) to (e) of that paragraph, with the exception of that set out in point (a) for holdings in diversified collective investment schemes, including managed funds such as pension funds or life insurance, provided that the holdings in such schemes do not put the shareholder or member of a credit rating agency in a position to exercise significant influence on the business activities of those schemes.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 6a(1), kadar njen družbenik ali član, ki ima najmanj 5 % kapitala ali glasovalnih pravic v bonitetni agenciji ali v družbi, ki lahko nadzoruje ali izvršuje pomemben vpliv na navedeno bonitetno agencijo, krši eno od prepovedi iz točk (a) do (e) navedenega odstavka, razen prepovedi iz točke (a), kadar ima premoženje v razpršenem KNPVP vključno z upravljanimi skladi kot so pokojninski skladi ali življenjsko zavarovanje, pod pogojem, da premoženje v takih naložbenih shemah ne omogoča družbeniku ali članu bonitetne agencije, da znatno vpliva na poslovne dejavnosti navedenih shem.“;
point 33 is replaced by the following:
točka 33 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 2 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not participate in or otherwise influence the determination of a credit rating or rating outlook as set out in point 2 of that Section.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v povezavi s točko 2 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točke 1 navedenega oddelka ne sodeluje pri določanju ali drugače vpliva na določanje bonitetne ocene ali obetov glede bonitetne ocene, kakor je določeno v točki 2 navedenega oddelka.“;
point 36 is replaced by the following:
točka 36 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 7 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not take up a key management position with the rated entity or a related third party within six months of the issuing of a credit rating or rating outlook.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v povezavi s točko 7 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točke 1 navedenega oddelka ne sprejme ključnega vodstvenega delovnega mesta pri ocenjevanem subjektu ali povezani tretji osebi, dokler ne preteče šest mesecev od izdelave bonitetne ocene ali obetov glede bonitetne ocene.“;
points 38, 39 and 40 are replaced by the following:
točke 38, 39 in 40 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (i) of point (b) of the first paragraph of point 8 Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that, where it provides unsolicited credit ratings or sovereign ratings, a rating analyst is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or a related third party for a period exceeding five years.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(4) v povezavi s točko (i) točke (b) prvega odstavka točke 8 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da pri izdajanju nenaročenih bonitetnih ocen ali bonitetnih ocen držav bonitetni analitiki niso vključeni v dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so povezane z istim ocenjevanim subjektom ali povezano tretjo osebo, dlje kot pet let.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (ii) of point (b) of the first paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that, where it provides unsolicited credit ratings or sovereign ratings, a person approving credit ratings is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or a related third party for a period exceeding seven years.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(4) v povezavi s točko (ii) točke (b) prvega odstavka točke 8 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da pri izdajanju nenaročenih bonitetnih ocen ali bonitetnih ocen držav oseba, ki odobri bonitetne ocene, ni vključena v dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so povezane z istim ocenjevanim subjektom ali povezano tretjo osebo, dlje kot sedem let.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first paragraph of that point is not involved in credit rating activities related to the rated entity or a related third party referred to in those points within two years of the end of the periods set out in those points.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(4) v povezavi z drugim odstavkom točke 8 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točk (a) in (b) prvega odstavka navedene točke ni vključena v dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so povezane z ocenjevanim subjektom ali povezano tretjo osebo, navedenimi v teh točkah, v dveh letih po koncu obdobij, določenih v navedenih točkah.“;
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2) by not adopting, implementing or enforcing adequate measures to ensure that the credit ratings and rating outlooks it issues are based on a thorough analysis of all the information that is available to it and that is relevant to its analysis according to the applicable rating methodologies.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8(2) če ne sprejme, izvaja ali izvršuje ustreznih ukrepov za zagotovitev, da bonitetne ocene in obeti glede bonitetne ocene, ki jih izdaja, temeljijo na poglobljeni analizi vseh informacij, ki so ji na voljo in so pomembne za njeno analizo glede na metodologije bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so v uporabi.“;
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2) by using information falling outside the scope of Article 8(2).
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8(2), če uporabi informacije, ki ne spadajo na področje uporabe člena 8(2).
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2a) by issuing changes in credit ratings that do not comply with its published rating methodologies.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8(2a) z izdajanjem sprememb v bonitetni oceni, ki niso skladne z njenimi objavljenimi metodologijami bonitetnega ocenjevanja.“;
point 46 is replaced by the following:
točka 46 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The credit rating agency infringes the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 8(5) by not monitoring its credit ratings other than sovereign ratings or by not reviewing its credit ratings other than sovereign ratings or rating methodologies on an ongoing basis or at least annually.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši prvi stavek prvega pododstavka člena 8(5), če svojih bonitetnih ocen, razen bonitetnih ocen držav, ne spremlja ali če svojih bonitetnih ocen, razen bonitetnih ocen držav, ali metodologij bonitetnega ocenjevanja ne pregleduje stalno ali najmanj enkrat letno.“;
The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 8(5), in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 8(5), by not monitoring its sovereign ratings or by not reviewing its sovereign ratings on an ongoing basis or at least every six months.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši drugi pododstavek člena 8(5) v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 8(5), če svojih bonitetnih ocen držav ne spremlja ali če svojih bonitetnih ocen držav ne pregleduje stalno ali najmanj vsakih šest mesecev.“;
The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 8(6), in conjunction with point (c) of Article 8(7), by not re-rating a credit rating where errors in the rating methodologies or in their application affect that credit rating.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (c) člena 8(6) v povezavi s točko (c) člena 8(7), če ne izvede ponovnega ocenjevanja bonitetne ocene, kadar napake v metodologijah bonitetnega ocenjevanja ali pri njihovi uporabi vplivajo na te bonitetne ocene.“;
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(3) by not publishing on its website, or by not submitting to ESMA on an annual basis, in accordance with point 3 of Part III of Section D of Annex I, a calendar at the end of December for the following 12 months, setting a maximum of three dates that fall on a Friday for the publication of unsolicited sovereign ratings and related rating outlooks and setting dates that fall on a Friday for the publication of solicited sovereign ratings and related rating outlooks.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8a(3), če v skladu s točko 3 dela II oddelka D Priloge I na svoji spletni strani ne objavi ali organu ESMA vsako leto konec decembra ne predloži koledarskega razporeda za naslednjih 12 mesecev, v katerem določi največ tri datume, ki padejo na petek, za objavo nenaročenih bonitetnih ocen držav in s tem povezanih obetov glede bonitetnih ocen pa tudi datume, ki padejo na petek, za objavo naročenih bonitetnih ocen držav in s tem povezanih obetov glede bonitetnih ocen.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(4) by deviating from the announced calendar where this is not necessary to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(2), Article 10(1) or Article 11(1) or by not providing a detailed explanation of the reasons for the deviation from the announced calendar.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8a(4), če odstopa od napovedanega koledarskega razporeda, kadar to ni potrebno za izpolnjevanje njenih obveznosti v skladu s členom 8(2), členom 10(1) ali členom 11(1), ali če ne pojasni podrobno odstopanja od napovedanega koledarskega razporeda.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Part III of Section D of Annex I, by publishing a sovereign rating or a related rating outlook during business hours of regulated markets or less than one hour before their opening.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(2) v povezavi s točko 3 dela III oddelka D Priloge I, če objavi bonitetno oceno države ali obete glede bonitetne ocene države v času trgovanja na reguliranih trgih ali manj kot uro pred njihovim odprtjem.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 4 of Part III of Section D of Annex I, by including policy recommendations, prescriptions or guidelines to rated entities, including States or regional or local authorities of States, as part of a sovereign rating or a related rating outlook.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(2) v povezavi s točko 4 dela III oddelka D Priloge I, če v bonitetne ocene držav ali povezane obete glede bonitetne ocene vključi politična priporočila, navodila ali smernice za ocenjevane subjekte, vključno z državami ali regionalnimi ali lokalnimi državnimi organi.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(2) by basing its public communications relating to changes in sovereign ratings, and which are not credit ratings, rating outlooks or accompanying press releases, as referred to in point 5 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, on information within the sphere of the rated entity, where such information has been disclosed without the consent of the rated entity, unless it is available from generally accessible sources or unless there are no legitimate reasons for the rated entity not to give its consent to the disclosure of the information.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8a(2), če njena sporočila za javnost v zvezi s spremembami bonitetnih ocen države, ki niso bonitetne ocene, obeti glede bonitetnih ocen ali spremljajoča sporočila za javnost iz točke 5 dela I oddelka D Priloge I, temeljijo na informacijah, ki jih ima ocenjeni subjekt, kadar ocenjeni subjekt ni dal soglasja za njihovo razkritje, razen če so na razpolago v splošno dostopnih virih ali če ni upravičenih razlogov, zakaj ocenjeni subjekt ne bi dal soglasja za razkritje teh informacij.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8a(1) by not issuing individual publicly available country reports when announcing the revision of a given group of countries.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8a(1), če ob napovedi pregleda določene skupine držav ne objavi javno dostopnih poročil o posameznih državah.
The credit rating agency infringes point 1 of Part III of Section D of Annex I by issuing a sovereign rating or a related rating outlook without simultaneously providing a detailed research report explaining all the assumptions, parameters, limits and uncertainties and any other information taken into account in determining that sovereign rating or rating outlook or by not making that report publicly available, clear and easily comprehensible.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko 1 dela III oddelka D Priloge I, če pri izdaji bonitetne ocene države ali povezanih obetov glede bonitetne ocene bonitetno oceno ali obete glede bonitetne ocene hkrati ne izda podrobnega raziskovalnega poročila, ki pojasnjuje vse predpostavke, parametre, omejitve in negotovosti ter vse druge informacije, ki so bili upoštevani pri določanju te bonitetne ocene države ali obetov glede bonitetne ocene, ali če to poročilo ni javno dostopno, jasno in lahko razumljivo.
The credit rating agency infringes point 2 of Part III of Section D of Annex I by not issuing a publicly available research report accompanying a change compared to the previous sovereign rating or related rating outlook or by not including in that report at least the information referred to in point 2(a) to (d) of Part III of Section D of Annex I.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko 2 dela III oddelka D Priloge I, če ne izda javno dostopnega raziskovalnega poročila, ki spremlja spremembo v primerjavi s prejšnjo bonitetno oceno države ali povezanimi obeti glede bonitetne ocene, ali če v to poročilo ne vključi vsaj informacij iz točke 2(a) do (d) dela III oddelka D Priloge I.“;
Section II is amended as follows:
oddelek II se spremeni:
The credit rating agency infringes the third subparagraph of Article 14(3) by not notifying ESMA of the intended material changes to the existing rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions or of the proposed new rating methodologies, models or key rating assumptions when it publishes the rating methodologies on its website in accordance with Article 8(5a).
Bonitetna agencija prekrši tretji pododstavek člena 14(3), če ESMA ne sporoči nameravanih bistvenih sprememb obstoječih metodologij bonitetnega ocenjevanja, modelov ali ključnih predpostavk ocenjevanja ali novih predlaganih metodologij bonitetnega ocenjevanja, modelov ali ključnih predpostavk ocenjevanja, ko metodologije bonitetnega ocenjevanja objavi na svoji spletni strani v skladu s členom 8(5a).
The credit rating agency infringes the first subparagraph of Article 8(5a) by not publishing on its website the proposed new rating methodologies or the proposed material changes to the rating methodologies that could have an impact on a credit rating together with an explanation of the reasons for and the implications of the changes.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši prvi pododstavek člena 8(5a), če na svoji spletni strani ne objavi predlaganih novih metodologij bonitetnega ocenjevanja ali predlaganih sprememb metodologij bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki bi lahko vplivale na bonitetno oceno, skupaj z obrazložitvijo razlogov za spremembe in njihovih posledic.
The credit rating agency infringes point (a) of Article 8(7) by not notifying ESMA of discovered errors in its rating methodologies or in their application or by not explaining their impact on its credit ratings, including the need to review its issued credit ratings.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (a) člena 8(7), če organu ESMA ne sporoči odkritih napak v svojih metodologijah bonitetnega ocenjevanja ali pri njihovi uporabi ali če ne pojasni vpliva na njene bonitetne ocene niti potrebo po pregledu že objavljenih bonitetnih ocen.“;
The credit rating agency infringes Article 11a(1) by not making available the required information or by not providing that information in the required format as referred to in that paragraph.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 11a(1), če ne da na voljo zahtevanih informacij ali če teh informacij ne zagotovi v zahtevani obliki iz navedenega odstavka.“;
The credit rating agency infringes Article 23b(1) by failing to provide information in response to a decision requiring information pursuant to Article 23b(3), or by providing incorrect or misleading information in response to a simple request for information or a decision.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 23b(1), če kot odziv na sklep, s katerim se zahtevajo informacije na podlagi člena 23b(3), ne predloži informacij, ali če kot odziv na sklep predloži napačne ali zavajajoče informacije.“;
The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 23c(1) by failing to provide an explanation, or by providing an incorrect or misleading explanation, on facts or documents related to to the subject matter and purpose of an inspection.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (c) člena 23c(1), če ne predloži obrazložitve ali predloži napačno ali zavajajočo obrazložitev glede dejstev ali dokumentov v zvezi s predmetom in namenom inšpekcije.“;
Section III is amended as follows:
oddelek III se spremeni:
The credit rating agency infringes point (aa) of Article 8(6), where it intends to use new rating methodologies, by not informing ESMA or by not publishing immediately on its website the results of the consultation and those new rating methodologies together with a detailed explanation thereof and their date of application.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (aa) člena 8(6), če, kadar namerava uporabiti nove metodologije bonitetnega ocenjevanja, o tem ne obvesti ESMA ali na svojem spletišču ne objavi nemudoma rezultatov posvetovanj ter novih metodologij bonitetnega ocenjevanja skupaj z njihovo podrobno razlago in datuma začetka izvajanja novih metodologij.
The credit rating agency infringes point (a) of Article 8(7) by not notifying affected rated entities of discovered errors in its rating methodologies or in their application,or by not explaining the impact on its credit ratings, including the need to review its issued credit ratings.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (a) člena 8(7), če ne sporoči odkritih napak v svojih metodologijah bonitetnega ocenjevanja ali pri njihovi uporabi ali če ne pojasni vpliva na njene bonitetne ocene niti potrebo po pregledu že objavljenih bonitetnih ocen.
The credit rating agency infringes point (b) of Article 8(7) by not publishing on its website discovered errors in its rating methodologies or in their application where such errors have an impact on the credit rating agency’s credit ratings.’;
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (b) člena 8(7), če na svojem spletišču ne objavi odkritih napak v svojih metodologijah bonitetnega ocenjevanja ali pri njihovi uporabi, kadar imajo tako napake vpliv na bonitetne ocene bonitetne agencije.“;
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 1 or 2, the first paragraph of point 4 or points 5 or 6, of Part I of Section D of Annex I, or Parts II or III of Section D of Annex I, by not providing the information as required by those provisions when presenting a credit rating or a rating outlook.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(2) v povezavi s točko 1 ali 2, prvim odstavkom točke 4 ali točko 5 ali 6 dela I oddelka D Priloge I ali dela II ali III oddelka D Priloge I, če ne predloži informacij, zahtevanih s temi določbami, ko predstavi bonitetno oceno ali obete glede bonitetne ocene.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, by not informing the rated entity during working hours of the rated entity and at least a full working day before publication of the credit rating or the rating outlook.’.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(2) v povezavi s točko 3 dela I oddelka D Priloge I, če ocenjevanega subjekta ne obvesti o bonitetni oceni ali obetih glede bonitetne ocene med delovnim časom ocenjevanega subjekta in najmanj en cel delovni dan pred njihovo objavo.“
The FSB principles were endorsed by the G20 Seoul Summit in November 2010.
Načela FSB so novembra 2010 potrdili na vrhu skupine G-20 v Seulu.
It is therefore appropriate that the sectoral competent authorities assess market participants’ practices and encourage those market participants to mitigate the impact of such practices.
Zato je primerno, da področni pristojni organi ocenijo prakse udeležencev na trgu in jih spodbudijo, naj ublažijo vpliv teh praks.
Pursuant to the FSB principles, ‘central banks should reach their own credit judgments on the financial instruments that they will accept in market operations, both as collateral and as outright purchases. Central bank policies should avoid mechanistic approaches that could lead to unnecessarily abrupt and large changes in the eligibility of financial instruments and the level of haircuts that may exacerbate cliff effects’.
Po načelih FSB „bi morale centralne banke same presoditi boniteto finančnih instrumentov, ki jih bodo sprejemale v tržnih operacijah, bodisi za zavarovanje bodisi kot neposredni nakup. Politike centralnih bank bi se morale izogibati sistematičnim pristopom, ki bi utegnili po nepotrebnem povzročiti nenadne in velike spremembe v primernosti finančnih instrumentov in stopnji odbitkov, ki bi lahko poslabšali učinke naglega pada“.
Furthermore, the ECB stated in its opinion of 2 April 2012 that it is committed to supporting the common objective of reducing over-reliance on credit ratings.
Poleg tega je ECB v svojem mnenju z dne 2. aprila 2012 podprla skupni cilj, da se zmanjša preveliko zanašanje na bonitetne ocene.
In that respect, the ECB reports regularly on the various measures taken by the Eurosystem to reduce reliance on credit ratings.
V zvezi s tem ECB redno poroča o različnih ukrepih Eurosistema za manjše zanašanje na bonitetne ocene.
Pursuant to Article 284(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the ECB is to address an annual report on the activities of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and on the monetary policy of both the previous and current years to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and also to the European Council.
Na podlagi člena 284(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) ECB posreduje letno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropskega sistema centralnih bank (ESCB) in o monetarni politiki v preteklem in tekočem letu Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji, pa tudi Evropskemu svetu.
The President of the ECB is to present that report to the European Parliament, which may hold a general debate on that basis, and to the Council.
Predsednik ECB predstavi to poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu, ki imata lahko na tej podlagi splošno razpravo, in Svetu.
Further, the ECB could, in such reports, describe how it has implemented the FSB principles and the alternative assessment mechanisms it uses.
Poleg tega bi lahko ECB v takih poročilih opisala, kako je izvajala načela FSB in alternativne ocenjevalne mehanizme, ki jih uporablja.