natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The object of imposing trade defence measures is to redress unfair trade practices and has no relation with the purchase of machinery and equipment for the manufacturing of the product concerned.
Cilj uvedbe ukrepov trgovinske zaščite je odpraviti nepoštene trgovinske prakse, kar ni povezano z nakupom strojev in opreme za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka.
This argument must therefore be considered irrelevant in the context of this anti-dumping investigation.
Zato je treba v okviru protidampinške preiskave to trditev šteti za nepomembno.
GENERALISED SCHEME OF PREFERENCES
SPLOŠNI SISTEM PREFERENCIALOV
Following the disclosure of the information document, several interested parties claimed that the impact on users will be further enhanced as the imports of the product concerned, in addition to a possible anti-dumping duty, will also be subject to the normal custom duty as from 1 January 2014.
Po razkritju opisnega lista je več zainteresiranih strani trdilo, da se bo učinek na uporabnike še dodatno povečal, saj bo uvoz zadevnega izdelka od 1. januarja 2014 poleg morebitne protidampinške dajatve tudi predmet običajne carine.
It is noted that indeed, under the new Generalised Scheme of Preferences of the European Union (GSP) which is expected to enter into force on 1 January 2014, Kazakhstan will no longer be listed as a beneficiary country.
Opozoriti je treba, da v okviru novega splošnega sistema preferencialov Evropske unije, ki naj bi začel veljati 1. januarja 2014, Kazahstan ne bo več na seznamu držav upravičenk.
Therefore, as of 1 January 2014, and until that situation persists, imports of Kazakhstan of white phosphorus will be subject to the normal duty rate of 5,5 %.
Zato bo za uvoz belega fosforja iz Kazahstana od 1. januarja 2014 in do nadaljnjega veljala običajna dajatev v višini 5,5 %.
However, future developments cannot be taken into consideration in the analysis as their precise impact on import prices and quantities and the effect of such developments on the Union market cannot be evaluated a priori.
Vendar prihodnjega razvoja dogodkov v analizi ni mogoče upoštevati, saj njihovega natančnega učinka na uvozne cene in obseg uvoza ter učinek takega razvoja dogodkov na trg Unije ni mogoče apriori oceniti.
Therefore, no firm conclusions can be drawn on this basis.
Na tej osnovi tako ni mogoče sprejeti nedvoumnih sklepov.
Thus, this claim was rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Should measures not be imposed, there is a strong likelihood that production of white phosphorus within the Union and the production of derivatives by the Union industry will not resume.
Če ukrepi ne bodo uvedeni, obstaja velika verjetnost, da se proizvodnja belega fosforja v Uniji in proizvodnja derivatov s strani industrije Unije ne bo ponovno zagnala.
On the other hand, as also claimed by some interested parties, the imposition of measures may not provide sufficient relief to the Union industry, as imports from Kazakhstan, even when subject to duties, would remain more competitive in terms of prices than the Union industry sales and would therefore not guarantee that the Union industry could overcome its current fragile situation.
Po drugi strani pa morda uvedba ukrepov, kot so trdile tudi nekatere zainteresirane strani, ne bo zadosti razbremenila industrije Unije, saj bi uvoz iz Kazahstana kljub morebitnim dajatvam ostal cenovno konkurenčnejši od prodaje industrije Unije, zaradi česar ni gotovo, da bi se industrija Unije lahko rešila iz trenutnega kritičnega položaja.
In contrast, it was found that users in the acid derivatives segment would be severely affected by the measures, and in some cases even their viability might be at stake, as they could not absorb the cost increase and continue to be competitive in the downstream market.
V nasprotju s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi ti ukrepi resno prizadeli uporabnike segmenta kislinskih derivatov in v nekaterih primerih celo vplivali na njihovo preživetje, saj ne bi mogli prenesti povišanja stroškov in biti še naprej konkurenčni na podrejenem trgu.
This might lead to the closure of donwstream producers in this segment
To bi lahko povzročilo propad proizvajalcev na koncu proizvodne verige v tem segmentu.
Moreover, while the investigation found that the impact of measures in the non-acid derivatives segment was expected to be overall less pronounced compared to the acid derivatives segment, some specific users in this segment might be more significantly affected depending on the specific downstream product produced by them.
Čeprav je bilo v preiskavi sicer ugotovljeno, da naj bi bil učinek ukrepov na segment nekislinskih derivatov na splošno manj izrazit kot na segment kislinskih derivatov, bi nekateri posamezni uporabniki v tem segmentu lahko bili veliko bolj prizadeti, odvisno od izdelka s konca proizvodne verige, ki ga proizvajajo.
Overall, the impact of the duty in this segment could not be regarded as negligible.
Na splošno učinka dajatve v tem segmentu ne bi mogli šteti za zanemarljivega.
It should be noted that the cooperating users providing the necessary information in this proceeding, represented almost the totality of imports from the country concerned and a very high proportion of the consumption of white phosphorus in the free market.
Opozoriti je treba, da so sodelujoči uporabniki, ki so zagotovili potrebne informacije v tem postopku, predstavljali skoraj ves uvoz iz zadevne države in zelo velik delež porabe belega fosforja na prostem trgu.
They were strongly against the imposition of any anti-dumping duties because of the impact on their costs which they showed could not or could not fully be reflected in their selling prices and which would therefore lead to a downward trend of their economic and financial situation with possible closures of production.
Močno so nasprotovali uvedbi protidampinških dajatev zaradi učinka na njihove stroške, ki jih po njihovih navedbah ne bi mogli ali vsaj ne bi mogli v celoti prikazati v svojih prodajnih cenah, in kar bi zato negativno vplivalo na njihov gospodarski in finančni položaj z možno ustavitvijo proizvodnje.
This is mainly due to the fact that white phosphorus is a resource which is, for almost all the users that came forward, regarded as a highly important raw material in their production process, representing a considerable part of their total production cost as mentioned above in recitals 161 and 166.
Razlog za to je v glavnem dejstvo, da je beli fosfor zelo pomembna surovina v proizvodnem procesu skoraj vseh uporabnikov, ki so se javili, in predstavlja znaten del njihovih skupnih proizvodnih stroškov, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 161 in 166.
Any anti-dumping duty has therefore a direct and important impact on their costs, while costs increases cannot be passed on to the downstream industries.
Vsaka protidampinška dajatev ima zato neposreden in pomemben učinek na njihove stroške, medtem ko povečanja stroškov ni mogoče prenesti na panoge na koncu proizvodne verige.
As mentioned above in recital 190, the benefit to the Union industry of the imposition of an anti-dumping duty remains questionable.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 190, so koristi uvedbe protidampinških dajatev za industrijo Unije vprašljive.
This is due to the currently transitional situation of the Union industry and the uncertainty of its future development as well as the fact that import prices from Kazakhstan may very likely remain significantly below the Union industry’s sales prices even if anti-dumping measures will be imposed.
To je posledica trenutnega prehodnega položaja industrije Unije in negotovosti njenega prihodnjega razvoja ter dejstva, da bi uvozne cene iz Kazahstana lahko zelo verjetno ostale znatno pod prodajnimi cenami industrije Unije, tudi če bodo uvedeni protidampinški ukrepi.
Under these circumstances, it was considered that the likely negative effect of any anti-dumping duty on the downstream industries outweighs the expected positive effects of the duty on the Union industry.
V teh okoliščinah se je štelo, da verjetni negativni učinek protidampinških dajatev na panoge na koncu proizvodne verige odtehtajo pričakovane pozitivne učinke dajatev na industrijo Unije.
On the basis of the above, on balance, it was concluded that the negative impact of measures on the users is more significant than the overall benefit to the Union industry.
Na podlagi navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da je skupaj negativni učinek ukrepov na uporabnike večji od splošne koristi za industrijo Unije.
Therefore, in this case, it is considered that despite the conclusions on injurious dumping, it can be clearly concluded that it is not in the Union interest to adopt anti-dumping measures.
Zato se v tem primeru šteje, da je kljub ugotovitvam o škodljivem dampingu mogoče nedvoumno skleniti, da sprejetje protidampinških ukrepov ni v interesu Unije.
G. PROPOSAL FOR TERMINATION OF THE PROCEEDING
G. PREDLOG ZA USTAVITEV POSTOPKA
In view of the conclusions reached above with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, in accordance with Article 9 and Article 21 of the basic Regulation, the proceeding should be terminated without the imposition of measures.
Glede na zgornje ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije, bi bilo postopek v skladu s členoma 9 in 21 osnovne uredbe treba ustaviti brez uvedbe ukrepov.
All parties concerned were informed of the final findings and the intention to terminate the procceding and were given the opportunity to comment.
Vse zadevne strani so bile obveščene o dokončnih ugotovitvah in o namenu ustavitve postopka ter so imele možnost predložiti pripombe.
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of white phosphorus, also called elemental or yellow phosphorus originating in the Republic of Kazakhstan is hereby terminated.
Protidampinški postopek za uvoz belega fosforja, imenovanega tudi elementarni ali rumeni fosfor, s poreklom iz Republike Kazahstan, se ustavi.
OJ C 369, 17.12.2011, p. 19.
UL C 369, 17.12.2011, str. 19.
Subsequent to the disclosure of the information document, Thermphos International BV had to file bankruptcy and later the Breda District Court ordered liquidation of the company on 21 November 2012.
Po razkritju opisnega lista je morala družba Thermphos International BV napovedati stečaj, okrožno sodišče Breda pa je nato 21. novembra 2012 odredilo likvidacijo družbe.
As mentioned above in recital 55, only for profitability and cash flow the analysis focused on the free market.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 55, se je analiza osredotočila na prosti trg samo za dobičkonosnost in denarni tok.
This was due to the fact that prices in the captive market did not reflect market prices which had an impact on those indicators.
Razlog za to je bilo dejstvo, da cene na omejenem trgu niso izražale tržnih cen, ki so vplivale na navedene kazalnike.
Several interested parties claimed that Union industry was performing well after its recovery from the economic downturn in 2009.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da je bila industrija Unije uspešna po okrevanju od upada gospodarske rasti leta 2009.
In specific, it was claimed that the evolution of certain injury indicators, namely the Union domestic and export sales volume and prices, cost of goods and investments but also production and capacity utilisation would not show material injury.
Zlasti so trdile, da razvoj nekaterih kazalcev škode, tj. obsega prodaje in prodajnih cen ter stroškov blaga in naložb na domačem in izvoznem trgu Unije ter tudi proizvodnje in izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, ne bo pokazal znatne škode.
Furthermore, the conclusions drawn by the interested parties concerned were based on assumptions not necessarily reflecting an objective assessment of the situation in 2009.
Poleg tega so ugotovitve zadevnih zainteresiranih strani temeljile na domnevah, ki niso nujno odražale objektivne ocene razmer v letu 2009.
The investigation has not revealed that the management decisions taken in 2009 were unusual or imprudent as the same accounts show for example that the retained earnings of the company were high during the same period, despite the overall difficult market situation.
Preiskava ni pokazala, da so bile upravne odločitve iz leta 2009 nenavadne ali nepremišljene, saj isti računovodski izkazi na primer kažejo, da je bil zadržani dobiček družbe v istem obdobju visok kljub na splošno težavnim razmeram na trgu.
As a consequence, the Union industry stopped its production of white phosphorus. In a press release issued by the Union industry, the latter indicated, however, that the remaining stocks of white phosphorus are sufficient to continue supplying their subsidiaries, manufacturing downstream products, for some months.
Industrija Unije je posledično ustavila svojo proizvodnjo belega fosforja, vendar je v sporočilu za javnost navedla, da je preostalih zalog belega fosforja dovolj za nekajmesečno nadaljnjo preskrbo njenih hčerinskih družb, ki proizvajajo izdelke s konca proizvodne verige.
on the approval by the Commission of national plans for the implementation of the validation systems in accordance with Article 109(8) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
o odobritvi nacionalnih načrtov za izvajanje sistemov potrjevanja v skladu s členom 109(8) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 s strani Komisije
(notified under document C(2013) 651)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 651)
(Only the Bulgarian, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem, bolgarskem, danskem, estonskem, finskem, francoskem, grškem, italijanskem, latvijskem, litovskem, malteškem, nemškem, nizozemskem, poljskem, portugalskem, slovenskem, španskem in švedskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to the Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006 [1], and in particular Article 109(8) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 z dne 20. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike, o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 847/96, (ES) št. 2371/2002, (ES) št. 811/2004, (ES) št. 768/2005, (ES) št. 2115/2005, (ES) št. 2166/2005, (ES) št. 388/2006, (ES) št. 509/2007, (ES) št. 676/2007, (ES) št. 1098/2007, (ES) št. 1300/2008, (ES) št. 1342/2008 in razveljavitvi uredb (EGS) št. 2847/93, (ES) št. 1627/94 in (ES) št. 1966/2006 [1], zlasti člena 109(8) Uredbe,
Having regard to the submission of national plans for the implementation of the validation systems by Member States,
ob upoštevanju nacionalnih načrtov za izvajanje sistemov potrjevanja, ki so jih predložile države članice,
Pursuant to Article 109(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 Member States shall establish a national plan for the implementation of the validation system, allowing Member States to make priorities for the validation and cross-checks and subsequent follow up on inconsistencies based on risk management.
V skladu s členom 109(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 države članice oblikujejo nacionalni načrt za izvajanje sistema potrjevanja, ki državam članicam omogoča, da na podlagi obvladovanja tveganja določijo prednostne naloge za potrjevanje in navzkrižna preverjanja ter za posledično spremljanje skladnosti.
National plans of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland have been submitted to the Commission for approval.
Kraljevina Belgija, Republika Bolgarija, Republika Ciper, Kraljevina Danska, Republika Estonija, Republika Finska, Francoska republika, Irska, Italijanska republika, Republika Latvija, Republika Litva, Republika Malta, Zvezna republika Nemčija, Kraljevina Nizozemska, Republika Poljska, Portugalska republika, Republika Slovenija, Kraljevina Španija, Kraljevina Švedska ter Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska so nacionalne načrte predložili Komisiji v odobritev.
They are in line with Article 109 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 and Articles 143 to 145 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy [2].
Načrti so v skladu s členom 109 Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 in členi 143 do 145 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 404/2011 z dne 8. aprila 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike [2].
This Decision constitutes the approval decision within the meaning of Article 109(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009.
Ta sklep pomeni odločitev o odobritvi v smislu člena 109(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009.
The Commission will monitor the application of the national plans with respect to their effective operation.
Komisija bo spremljala izvajanje nacionalnih načrtov, da bi ugotovila, ali je njihovo delovanje učinkovito.
If, on the basis of the findings of the verifications, inspections and audits carried out by the Commission within the framework of Title X of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, amendments to the national validation plans will be deemed necessary, the Member States should amend the plan accordingly,
Če bo Komisija na podlagi ugotovitev preverjanj, inšpekcijskih pregledov in revizij, ki jih bo izvajala na podlagi naslova X Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009, menila, da so potrebne spremembe nacionalnih načrtov za potrjevanje, morajo države članice načrte ustrezno spremeniti –
The national plans according to Article 109(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the implementation of the validation system are approved.
Nacionalni načrti Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Bolgarije, Republike Cipra, Kraljevine Danske, Republike Estonije, Republike Finske, Francoske republike, Irske, Italijanske republike, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Malte, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Poljske, Portugalske republike, Republike Slovenije, Kraljevine Španije, Kraljevine Švedske ter Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za izvajanje sistema potrjevanja v skladu s členom 109(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 se odobrijo.
If, on the basis of the findings of the verifications, inspections and audits carried out within the framework of Title X of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, the Commission considers that the validation plans approved in accordance with paragraph 1 do not ensure effective implementation by Member States of the obligations laid down in Article 109 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, it may, after having consulted the Member States concerned, request the amendment of the plans.
Če Komisija na podlagi ugotovitev preverjanj, inšpekcijskih pregledov in revizij, izvedenih na podlagi naslova X Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009, meni, da načrti za potrjevanje, odobreni v skladu z odstavkom 1, ne zagotavljajo učinkovitega izvajanja obveznosti iz člena 109 Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 s strani držav članic, lahko po posvetovanju z zadevnimi državami članicami zahteva, da se ti načrti spremenijo.
Member States shall amend their validation plans in accordance with the request of the Commission pursuant to paragraph 2.
Države članice spremenijo načrte za potrjevanje v skladu z zahtevo Komisije na podlagi odstavka 2.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Belgijo, Republiko Bolgarijo, Republiko Ciper, Kraljevino Dansko, Republiko Estonijo, Republiko Finsko, Francosko republiko, Irsko, Italijansko republiko, Republiko Latvijo, Republiko Litvo, Republiko Malto, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Republiko Poljsko, Portugalsko republiko, Republiko Slovenijo, Kraljevino Španijo, Kraljevino Švedsko ter Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
of 11 February 2013
z dne 11. februarja 2013
establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions for the tanning of hides and skins
o določitvi zaključkov o najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologijah (BAT) v skladu z Direktivo 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o industrijskih emisijah
(notified under document C(2013) 618)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 618)
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) [1], and in particular Article 13(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) [1], zlasti člena 13(5) Direktive,
Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the Commission to organise an exchange of information on industrial emissions between it and Member States, the industries concerned and non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protection in order to facilitate the drawing up of best available techniques (BAT) reference documents as defined in Article 3(11) of that Directive.
V skladu s členom 13(1) Direktive 2010/75/EU mora Komisija organizirati izmenjavo informacij o industrijskih emisijah med Komisijo in državami članicami, zadevnimi panogami ter nevladnimi organizacijami, ki spodbujajo varstvo okolja, da se spodbudi priprava referenčnih dokumentov o najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologijah (BAT) iz člena 3(11) navedene direktive.
‘BAT conclusions’ as defined in Article 3(12) of Directive 2010/75/EU are the key element of BAT reference documents and lay down the conclusions on best available techniques, their description, information to assess their applicability, the emission levels associated with the best available techniques, associated monitoring, associated consumption levels and, where appropriate, relevant site remediation measures.
„Zaključki o BAT“ iz člena 3(12) Direktive 2010/75/EU so ključni element referenčnih dokumentov BAT in določajo zaključke o najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologijah, njihov opis, informacije za oceno njihove ustreznosti, ravni emisij, povezane z najboljšimi razpoložljivimi tehnologijami, z njimi povezano spremljanje in vrednosti porabe ter po potrebi zadevne ukrepe za sanacijo lokacije.