natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the MAC-EQS are marked as “not applicable”, the AA-EQS values are considered protective against short-term pollution peaks in continuous discharges since they are significantly lower than the values derived on the basis of acute toxicity.
Kjer so NDK-OSK označene kot ‚ni relevantno‘, se šteje, da vrednosti LP-OSK zagotavljajo varstvo pred kratkotrajnimi konicami onesnaženja v stalnih izpustih, ker so znatno nižje od vrednosti, določenih na podlagi akutne toksičnosti.
For the group of priority substances covered by brominated diphenylethers (No 5), the EQS refers to the sum of the concentrations of congener numbers 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 and 154.
Za skupino prednostnih snovi, ki jih zajemajo bromirani difeniletri (št. 5), se OSK nanaša na vsoto koncentracij sorodnih snovi pod številkami 28, 47, 99, 100, 153 in 154.
For Cadmium and its compounds (No 6) the EQS values vary depending on the hardness of the water as specified in five class categories (Class 1: < 40 mg CaCO3/l, Class 2: 40 to < 50 mg CaCO3/l, Class 3: 50 to < 100 mg CaCO3/l, Class 4: 100 to < 200 mg CaCO3/l and Class 5: ≥ 200 mg CaCO3/l).
Za kadmij in njegove spojine (št. 6) se vrednosti OSK razlikujejo glede na trdoto vode, razdeljeno v pet razredov (razred 1: < 40 mg CaCO3/l, razred 2: 40 do < 50 mg CaCO3/l, razred 3: 50 do < 100 mg CaCO3/l, razred 4: 100 do < 200 mg CaCO3/l in razred 5: ≥ 200 mg CaCO3/l).
No indicative parameter is provided for this group of substances.
Okvirni parameter za to skupino snovi ni opredeljen.
The indicative parameter(s) must be defined through the analytical method.
Okvirni parameter(-ri) mora(-jo) biti opredeljen(-i) z analitsko metodo.
DDT total comprises the sum of the isomers 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2 bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethane (CAS number 50-29-3; EU number 200-024-3); 1,1,1-trichloro-2 (o-chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl) ethane (CAS number 789-02-6; EU Number 212-332-5); 1,1-dichloro-2,2 bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethylene (CAS number 72-55-9; EU Number 200-784-6); and 1,1-dichloro-2,2 bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethane (CAS number 72-54-8; EU Number 200-783-0).
Celotni DDT obsega vsoto izomerov 1,1,1-trikloro-2,2 bis (p-klorofenil) etana (številka CAS 50-29-3; številka EU 200-024-3); 1,1,1-trikloro-2 (o-klorofenil)-2-(p-klorofenil) etana (številka CAS 789-02-6; številka EU 212-332-5); 1,1-dikloro-2,2 bis (p-klorofenil) etilena (številka CAS 72-55-9; številka EU 200-784-6) in 1,1-dikloro-2,2 bis (p-klorofenil) etana (številka CAS 72-54-8; številka EU 200-783-0).
There is insufficient information available to set a MAC-EQS for these substances.
Za določitev NDK-OSK za te snovi ni na voljo zadostnih informacij.
For the group of priority substances of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (No 28), the biota EQS and corresponding AA-EQS in water refer to the concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, on the toxicity of which they are based.
Pri skupini prednostnih snovi poliaromatskih ogljikovodikov (PAH) (št. 28) se OSK za organizme in ustrezni LP-OSK v vodi nanašajo na koncentracijo benzo(a)pirena, saj temeljijo na njegovi toksičnosti.
Benzo(a)pyrene can be considered as a marker for the other PAHs, hence only benzo(a)pyrene needs to be monitored for comparison with the biota EQS or the corresponding AA-EQS in water.
Benzo(a)piren se lahko šteje za kazalnik za druge PAH, zato je treba za primerjavo z OSK za organizme ali ustreznimi LP-OSK za vodo spremljati le benzo(a)piren.
Unless otherwise indicated, the biota EQS relate to fish.
OSK za organizme se nanaša na ribe, razen če ni določeno drugače.
An alternative biota taxon, or another matrix, may be monitored instead, as long as the EQS applied provides an equivalent level of protection.
Namesto tega se lahko spremlja drug takson ali drug medij, če OSK, ki se uporablja, zagotavlja enako raven zaščite.
These EQS refer to bioavailable concentrations of the substances.
Ti OSK se nanašajo na biološko razpoložljive koncentracije snovi.
PCDD: polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins; PCDF: polychlorinated dibenzofurans; PCB-DL: dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls; TEQ: toxic equivalents according to the World Health Organisation 2005 Toxic Equivalence Factors.’
PCDD: poliklorirani dibenzo-p-dioksini; PCDF: poliklorirani dibenzofurani; PCB-DL: dioksinom podobni poliklorirani bifenili; TEQ: toksični ekvivalenti v skladu s faktorji toksične ekvivalentnosti Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije iz leta 2005.“
The revised EQS for existing priority substances should be taken into account for the first time in river basin management plans covering the period 2015 to 2021.
Pregledane OSK za obstoječe prednostne snovi bi bilo treba prvič upoštevati v načrtih za upravljanje povodij za obdobje 2015–2021.
The newly identified priority substances and their EQS should be taken into account in the establishment of supplementary monitoring programmes and in preliminary programmes of measures to be submitted by the end of 2018.
Novo določene prednostne snovi in njihove OSK bi bilo treba upoštevati pri pripravi dodatnih programov o spremljanju in v predhodnih programih ukrepov, ki bodo predloženi pred koncem leta 2018.
With the aim of achieving good surface water chemical status, the revised EQS for existing priority substances should be met by the end of 2021 and the EQS for newly identified priority substances by the end of 2027, without prejudice to Article 4(4) to (9) of Directive 2000/60/EC, which includes inter alia provisions for extending the deadline for achieving good surface water chemical status or achieving less stringent environmental objectives for specific bodies of water on the grounds of disproportionate cost and/or socio-economic need, provided that no further deterioration occurs in the status of the affected bodies of water.
Brez poseganja v člen 4(4) do (9) Direktive 2000/60/ES, ki med drugim vključuje določbe o podaljšanju roka za doseganje dobrega kemijskega stanja ali določitvi manj strogih okoljskih ciljev za določena vodna telesa zaradi nesorazmernih stroškov in/ali socialno-ekonomskih potreb, bi bilo treba zaradi doseganja dobrega kemijskega stanja površinskih voda pregledane OSK za obstoječe prednostne snovi izpolniti do konca leta 2021, OSK za novo določene prednostne snovi pa do konca 2027, če se stanje prizadetih vodnih teles še bolj ne poslabša.
Member States shall arrange for the long-term trend analysis of concentrations of those priority substances listed in Part A of Annex I that tend to accumulate in sediment and/or biota, giving particular consideration to the substances numbered 2, 5, 6, 7, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 26, 28, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 43 and 44 listed in Part A of Annex I, on the basis of the monitoring of surface water status carried out in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC. Member States shall take measures aimed at ensuring, subject to Article 4 of Directive 2000/60/EC, that such concentrations do not significantly increase in sediment and/or relevant biota.
Države članice na podlagi spremljanja stanja vode, ki se izvede v skladu s členom 8 Direktive 2000/60/ES, zagotovijo dolgoročno analizo trenda koncentracij prednostnih snovi iz dela A Priloge I, ki se pogosto kopičijo v usedlinah in/ali organizmih, pri čemer se posebna pozornost nameni snovem pod številkami 2, 5, 6, 7, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 26, 28, 30, 34, 35, 36, 37, 43 in 44 v delu A Priloge I. Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, katerih cilj je ob upoštevanju člena 4 Direktive 2000/60/ES zagotoviti, da se te koncentracije v usedlinah in/ali ustreznih organizmih znatno ne povečajo.
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 3(8) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of six years from 13 September 2013.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 3(8) se prenese na Komisijo za šest let od 13. septembra 2013.
The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the six-year period.
Komisija pripravi poročilo o prenesenem pooblastilu najpozneje devet mesecev pred koncem šestletnega obdobja.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 14 September 2015.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 14. septembra 2015.
For substances numbered 15 (Fluoranthene) and 28 (PAHs), the biota EQS refers to crustaceans and molluscs.
Za snovi pod številko 15 (fluorantin) in 28 (PAH) se OSK za organizme nanaša na rake in mehkužce.
For the purpose of assessing chemical status, monitoring of Fluoranthene and PAHs in fish is not appropriate.
Spremljanje fluorantina in PAH v ribah ni primerno za oceno kemijskega stanja.
For substance number 37 (Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds), the biota EQS relates to fish, crustaceans and molluscs, in line with section 5.3 of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1259/2011 of 2 December 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for dioxins, dioxin-like PCBs and non-dioxin-like PCBs in foodstuffs (OJ L 320, 3.12.2011, p. 18).
Za snovi pod številko 37 (dioksini in dioksinom podobne spojine) se OSK za organizme nanašajo na ribe, rake in mehkužce, v skladu z oddelkom 5.3 Priloge k Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 1259/2011 z dne 2. decembra 2011 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1881/2006 v zvezi z mejnimi vrednostmi dioksinov, dioksinom podobnih PCB-jev in dioksinom nepodobnih PCB-jev v živilih (UL L 320, 3.12.2011, str. 18).
Directive 2013/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2013/40/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on attacks against information systems and replacing Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA
o napadih na informacijske sisteme in nadomestitvi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2005/222/PNZ
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 83(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 83(1) Pogodbe,
The objectives of this Directive are to approximate the criminal law of the Member States in the area of attacks against information systems by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and the relevant sanctions and to improve cooperation between competent authorities, including the police and other specialised law enforcement services of the Member States, as well as the competent specialised Union agencies and bodies, such as Eurojust, Europol and its European Cyber Crime Centre, and the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA).
Cilji te direktive so z uvedbo minimalnih pravil glede opredelitve kaznivih dejanj in zadevnih sankcij na področju napadov na informacijske sisteme približati kazensko pravo držav članic ter izboljšati sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi, vključno s policijo in drugimi specializiranimi službami kazenskega pregona držav članic, pa tudi med pristojnimi specializiranimi agencijami in organi Unije, kot so Eurojust, Europol z evropskim centrom za kibernetski kriminal in Evropska agencija za varnost omrežij in informacij (ENISA).
Information systems are a key element of political, social and economic interaction in the Union.
Informacijski sistemi so ključnega pomena za politično, družbeno in gospodarsko sodelovanje v Uniji.
Society is highly and increasingly dependent on such systems.
Družba je zelo in vedno bolj odvisna od tovrstnih sistemov.
The smooth operation and security of those systems in the Union is vital for the development of the internal market and of a competitive and innovative economy.
Nemoteno delovanje in varnost teh sistemov v Uniji sta bistvena za razvoj notranjega trga ter konkurenčnega in inovativnega gospodarstva.
Ensuring an appropriate level of protection of information systems should form part of an effective comprehensive framework of prevention measures accompanying criminal law responses to cybercrime.
Zagotavljanje ustrezne ravni zaščite informacijskih sistemov bi moralo biti del učinkovitega celostnega okvira preventivnih ukrepov, ki spremljajo kazenskopravne ukrepe proti kibernetskemu kriminalu.
Attacks against information systems, and, in particular, attacks linked to organised crime, are a growing menace in the Union and globally, and there is increasing concern about the potential for terrorist or politically motivated attacks against information systems which form part of the critical infrastructure of Member States and of the Union.
Napadi na informacijske sisteme in zlasti napadi, povezani z organiziranim kriminalom, so vedno večja grožnja v Uniji in po svetu, vedno večja pa je tudi zaskrbljenost zaradi možnosti terorističnih ali politično motiviranih napadov na informacijske sisteme, ki so del kritične infrastrukture držav članic in Unije.
This constitutes a threat to the achievement of a safer information society and of an area of freedom, security, and justice, and therefore requires a response at Union level and improved cooperation and coordination at international level.
To ogroža uresničevanje ciljev varnejše informacijske družbe ter območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, zato zahteva odziv na ravni Unije ter boljše sodelovanje in usklajevanje na mednarodni ravni.
There are a number of critical infrastructures in the Union, the disruption or destruction of which would have a significant cross-border impact.
V Uniji je nekaj kritičnih infrastruktur, katerih okvara ali uničenje bi imela resne čezmejne posledice.
It has become apparent from the need to increase the critical infrastructure protection capability in the Union that the measures against cyber attacks should be complemented by stringent criminal penalties reflecting the gravity of such attacks.
Zahteva po povečanju zmogljivosti za zaščito kritične infrastrukture v Uniji kaže na to, da bi morali biti ukrepi proti kibernetskim napadom dopolnjeni s strogimi kaznimi, ki bi odražale resnost teh napadov.
Critical infrastructure could be understood to be an asset, system or part thereof located in Member States, which is essential for the maintenance of vital societal functions, health, safety, security, economic or social well-being of people, such as power plants, transport networks or government networks, and the disruption or destruction of which would have a significant impact in a Member State as a result of the failure to maintain those functions.
Kritično infrastrukturo bi se lahko razumelo kot zmogljivost, sistem ali njegov del, ki se nahaja v državah članicah in je bistven za vzdrževanje osnovnih družbenih funkcij, zdravja, varnosti, zaščite, gospodarske ali družbene blaginje ljudi, kot so elektrarne, prometna omrežja ter vladna omrežja, in katerega okvara ali uničenje bi imelo zaradi nezmožnosti vzdrževanja teh funkcij v državi članici resne posledice.
There is evidence of a tendency towards increasingly dangerous and recurrent large-scale attacks conducted against information systems which can often be critical to Member States or to particular functions in the public or private sector.
Kažejo se težnje k vedno bolj nevarnim in ponavljajočim se obsežnim napadom na informacijske sisteme, ki so lahko pogosto ključni za države ali za posebne funkcije v javnem ali zasebnem sektorju.
This tendency is accompanied by the development of increasingly sophisticated methods, such as the creation and use of so-called ‘botnets’, which involves several stages of a criminal act, where each stage alone could pose a serious risk to public interests.
Te težnje spremlja razvoj vedno bolj izpopolnjenih metod, kot sta vzpostavitev in uporaba tako imenovanih „botnetov“, kar vključuje več faz kaznivega dejanja, pri čemer lahko vsaka faza zase močno ogrozi javni interes.
This Directive aims, inter alia, to introduce criminal penalties for the creation of botnets, namely, the act of establishing remote control over a significant number of computers by infecting them with malicious software through targeted cyber attacks.
V tej zvezi je namen te direktive tudi uvedba kazni za vzpostavitev „botneta“, in sicer ko je s ciljno usmerjenimi kibernetskimi napadi nad znatnim številom računalnikov vzpostavljen nadzor na daljavo in so ti okuženi z zlonamerno programsko opremo.
Once created, the infected network of computers that constitute the botnet can be activated without the computer users’ knowledge in order to launch a large-scale cyber attack, which usually has the capacity to cause serious damage, as referred to in this Directive.
Kasneje se okužena mreža računalnikov, ki sestavljajo „botnet“, lahko brez vednosti njihovih uporabnikov aktivira za kibernetski napad velikega obsega, ki je navadno zmožen povzročiti resno škodo, kakor je navedeno v tej direktivi.
Member States may determine what constitutes serious damage according to their national law and practice, such as disrupting system services of significant public importance, or causing major financial cost or loss of personal data or sensitive information.
Države članice lahko v skladu s svojo nacionalno zakonodajo in prakso opredelijo, kaj pomeni resna škoda, kot je prekinitev sistemskih storitev velikega javnega pomena, povzročitev velikih finančnih stroškov ali izguba osebnih podatkov ali občutljivih informacij.
Large-scale cyber attacks can cause substantial economic damage both through the interruption of information systems and communication and through the loss or alteration of commercially important confidential information or other data.
Kibernetski napadi velikega obsega lahko povzročijo znatno gospodarsko škodo tako zaradi prekinitve delovanja informacijskih sistemov in komunikacij kot tudi zaradi izgube ali spremembe gospodarsko pomembnih zaupnih ali drugih podatkov.
Particular attention should be paid to raising the awareness of innovative small and medium-sized enterprises to threats relating to such attacks and their vulnerability to such attacks, due to their increased dependence on the proper functioning and availability of information systems and often limited resources for information security.
Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba nameniti ozaveščanju inovativnih malih in srednjih podjetij o grožnjah, povezanih s tovrstnimi napadi in njihova ranljivosti ob tovrstnih napadih, saj so ta vedno bolj odvisna od ustreznega delovanja in razpoložljivosti informacijskih sistemov in imajo pogosto omejena sredstva za informacijsko varnost.
Common definitions in this area are important in order to ensure a consistent approach in the Member States to the application of this Directive.
Skupne opredelitve na tem področju so pomembne za zagotovitev skladnega pristopa v državah članicah k uporabi te direktive.
There is a need to achieve a common approach to the constituent elements of criminal offences by introducing common offences of illegal access to an information system, illegal system interference, illegal data interference, and illegal interception.
Treba je doseči skupni pristop k sestavnim elementom kaznivih dejanj z uvedbo skupnih opredelitev za kazniva dejanja nezakonitega dostopa do informacijskega sistema, nezakonitega poseganja v sisteme, nezakonitega poseganja v podatke in nezakonitega prestrezanja podatkov.
Interception includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the listening to, monitoring or surveillance of the content of communications and the procuring of the content of data either directly, through access and use of the information systems, or indirectly through the use of electronic eavesdropping or tapping devices by technical means.
Prestrezanje vključuje, vendar ni nujno omejeno na, poslušanje, spremljanje ali nadzor vsebine sporočil in pridobitev vsebine podatkov bodisi neposredno z dostopom v informacijski sistem in njegovo uporabo bodisi posredno z uporabo elektronskega prisluškovanja ali tehničnih naprav za prisluškovanje.
Member States should provide for penalties in respect of attacks against information systems.
Države članice bi morale določiti kazni za napade na informacijske sisteme.
Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and should include imprisonment and/or fines.
Te kazni bi morale biti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne ter vključevati zaporno in/ali denarne kazni.
This Directive provides for criminal penalties at least for cases which are not minor.
Ta direktiva določa kazni vsaj za primere, ki niso majhnega pomena.
Member States may determine what constitutes a minor case according to their national law and practice.
Države članice lahko v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom in prakso določijo, kaj je primer majhnega pomena.
A case may be considered minor, for example, where the damage caused by the offence and/or the risk to public or private interests, such as to the integrity of a computer system or to computer data, or to the integrity, rights or other interests of a person, is insignificant or is of such a nature that the imposition of a criminal penalty within the legal threshold or the imposition of criminal liability is not necessary.
Posamezni primer lahko šteje za primer majhnega pomena, kadar sta škoda, ki jo povzroči dejanje, in/ali tveganje za javni ali zasebni interes, kot so integriteta računalniškega sistema ali računalniških podatkov ali integriteta, pravice ali drugi interesi posameznika, zanemarljiva ali takšna, da naložitev kazni v okviru zakonskega praga ali uvedba kazenske odgovornosti nista potrebna.
The identification and reporting of threats and risks posed by cyber attacks and the related vulnerability of information systems is a pertinent element of effective prevention of, and response to, cyber attacks and to improving the security of information systems.
Identifikacija ter prijava groženj in tveganj, ki jih povzročijo kibernetski napadi, ter s tem povezana ranljivost informacijskih sistemov so pomembni element za učinkovito preprečevanje kibernetskih napadov in odzivanja nanje ter izboljšanja varnosti informacijskih sistemov.
Providing incentives to report security gaps could add to that effect.
K temu bi lahko prispevale tudi spodbude za prijavo varnostnih vrzeli.
Member States should endeavour to provide possibilities for the legal detection and reporting of security gaps.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati, da zagotovijo možnosti za zakonito odkrivanje in prijavo varnostnih vrzeli.
It is appropriate to provide for more severe penalties where an attack against an information system is committed by a criminal organisation, as defined in Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime [3], where a cyber attack is conducted on a large scale, thus affecting a significant number of information systems, including where it is intended to create a botnet, or where a cyber attack causes serious damage, including where it is carried out through a botnet.
Ustrezno je uvesti strožje kazni za napade na informacijske sisteme, ki jih izvede hudodelska združba, kakor je opredeljena v Okvirnem sklepu Sveta 2008/841/PNZ z dne 24. oktobra 2008 o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu [3], kadar je napad obsežen in zato prizadene znatno število informacijskih sistemov, tudi kadar je namen napada ustvariti „botnet“ali kadar kibernetski napad povzroči resno škodo, tudi kadar se napad izvede prek „botneta“.
It is also appropriate to provide for more severe penalties where an attack is conducted against a critical infrastructure of the Member States or of the Union.
Ustrezno je predvideti tudi strožje kazni za primere, ko gre za napad na kritično infrastrukturo držav članic ali Unije.
Setting up effective measures against identity theft and other identity-related offences constitutes another important element of an integrated approach against cybercrime.
Vzpostavitev učinkovitih ukrepov proti kraji identitete in drugim kaznivim dejanjem, povezanim z identiteto, je prav tako pomemben element celovitega pristopa k boju proti kibernetski kriminaliteti.
Any need for Union action against this type of criminal behaviour could also be considered in the context of evaluating the need for a comprehensive horizontal Union instrument.
Pri ocenjevanju potrebe po celovitem horizontalnem instrumentu Unije bi lahko razmislili tudi o morebitni potrebi po ukrepu na ravni Unije proti tovrstnim kaznivim dejanjem.