natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These documents define the way forward for dealing with the legal, financial and organisational aspects of digitising Europe’s cultural heritage and bringing it online.
Ti dokumenti določajo način, kako se bodo v prihodnje obravnavali pravni, finančni in organizacijski vidiki digitalizacije kulturne dediščine Evrope in njene postavitve na splet.
To facilitate re-use, public sector bodies should, where possible and appropriate, make documents available through open and machine-readable formats and together with their metadata, at the best level of precision and granularity, in a format that ensures interoperability, e.g. by processing them in a way consistent with the principles governing the compatibility and usability requirements for spatial information under Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) [8].
Kjer je izvedljivo in ustrezno, bi morali organi javnega sektorja zaradi olajšanja ponovne uporabe dokumente dati na voljo v odprtih in strojno berljivih formatih skupaj z njihovimi metapodatki, z največjo stopnjo natančnosti in ločljivosti, v obliki, ki zagotavlja interoperabilnost, npr. z njihovo obdelavo na način, ki je v skladu z načeli, ki urejajo zahteve za združljivost in uporabnost prostorskih informacij v skladu z Direktivo 2007/2/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. marca 2007 o vzpostavitvi infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v Evropski skupnosti (INSPIRE) [8].
A document should be considered to be in a machine-readable format if it is in a file format that is structured in such a way that software applications can easily identify, recognise and extract specific data from it.
Veljati bi moralo, da je dokument v strojno berljivem formatu, če je v datotečnem formatu, ki je strukturiran tako, da programskim aplikacijam omogoča, da v njem zlahka določajo, prepoznavajo in izločajo določene podatke.
Data encoded in files that are structured in a machine-readable format are machine-readable data.
Podatki, kodirani v datotekah, ki so strukturirane v strojno berljivem formatu, so strojno berljivi podatki.
Machine-readable formats can be open or proprietary; they can be formal standards or not.
Strojno berljivi formati so lahko odprti ali lastniški; lahko so formalni standardi ali ne.
Documents encoded in a file format that limits automatic processing, because the data cannot, or cannot easily, be extracted from them, should not be considered to be in a machine-readable format.
Za dokumente, kodirane v datotečnem formatu, ki omejuje samodejno obdelavo, saj iz njih podatkov ni možno ali jih ni možno zlahka izločiti, ne bi smelo veljati, da so v strojno berljivem formatu.
Member States should where appropriate encourage the use of open, machine-readable formats.
Države članice bi morale, kjer je to primerno, spodbujati uporabo odprtih, strojno berljivih formatov.
Where charges are made by public sector bodies for the re-use of documents, those charges should in principle be limited to the marginal costs.
Kadar organi javnega sektorja zaračunavajo ponovno uporabo dokumentov, bi morala biti nadomestila načeloma omejena na mejne stroške.
However the necessity of not hindering the normal running of public sector bodies that are required to generate revenue to cover a substantial part of their costs relating to the performance of their public tasks or of the costs relating to the collection, production, reproduction and dissemination of certain documents made available for re-use should be taken into consideration.
Vendar je zlasti treba upoštevati potrebo, da se ne otežuje običajnega delovanja organov javnega sektorja, od katerih se zahteva, da ustvarjajo prihodek za kritje znatnega deleža svojih stroškov, povezanih z izvajanjem svojih javnih nalog ali stroškov zbiranja, priprave, reprodukcije in razširjanja nekaterih dokumentov, ki so dani na voljo za ponovno uporabo.
In such cases, public sector bodies should be able to charge above marginal costs.
Organi javnega sektorja bi morali imeti možnost, da v takih primerih zaračunavajo več kot mejne stroške.
Those charges should be set according to objective, transparent and verifiable criteria and the total income from supplying and allowing re-use of documents should not exceed the cost of collection, production, reproduction and dissemination, together with a reasonable return on investment.
Ta nadomestila bi morala biti določena v skladu z objektivnimi, preglednimi in preverljivimi merili, skupni prihodek od zagotavljanja dokumentov in dovoljenj za ponovno uporabo dokumentov pa ne bi smel presegati stroškov zbiranja, priprave, reprodukcije ali razširjanja, vključno z razumno donosnostjo naložbe.
The requirement to generate revenue to cover a substantial part of the public sector bodies’ costs relating to the performance of their public tasks or of the costs relating to the collection, production, reproduction and dissemination of certain documents, does not have to be a legal requirement and may stem, for example, from administrative practices in Member States.
Zahteva, da se ustvarja prihodek za kritje znatnega deleža stroškov organov javnega sektorja, povezanih z izvajanjem njihovih javnih nalog, ali stroškov zbiranja, priprave, reprodukcije in razširjanja nekaterih dokumentov, ni nujno pravna zahteva in lahko na primer izhaja iz upravne prakse držav članic.
Such a requirement should be regularly reviewed by the Member States.
Take zahteve bi morale države članice redno pregledovati.
Libraries, museums and archives should also be able to charge above marginal costs in order not to hinder their normal running.
Knjižnice, muzeji in arhivi bi tudi morali imeti možnost, da zaračunavajo več kot mejne stroške, da njihovo normalno delovanje ne bi bilo ovirano.
In the case of such public sector bodies the total income from supplying and allowing re-use of documents over the appropriate accounting period should not exceed the cost of collection, production, reproduction, dissemination, preservation and rights clearance, together with a reasonable return on investment.
V primeru navedenih organov javnega sektorja skupni prihodek od zagotavljanja dokumentov in dovoljevanja ponovne uporabe dokumentov v ustreznem obračunskem obdobju ne bi smel presegati stroškov zbiranja, priprave, reprodukcije, razširjanja, hrambe in pridobitve pravic, vključno z razumno donosnostjo naložbe.
For the purpose of libraries, museums and archives and bearing in mind their particularities, the prices charged by the private sector for the re-use of identical or similar documents could be considered when calculating a reasonable return on investment.
Pri knjižnicah, muzejih in arhivih se lahko zaradi njihovih posebnosti pri izračunu razumne donosnosti naložbe upoštevajo nadomestila, ki se v zasebnem sektorju zaračunavajo za ponovno uporabo enakih ali podobnih dokumentov.
The upper limits for charges set in this Directive are without prejudice to the right of Member States to apply lower charges or no charges at all.
Zgornje meje nadomestil, določene v tej direktivi, ne posegajo v pravice držav članic, da uvedejo nižja nadomestila ali sploh nobenih.
Member States should lay down the criteria for charging above marginal costs.
Države članice bi morale določiti merila za zaračunavanje nad mejnimi stroški.
In this respect, Member States, for example, may lay down such criteria in national rules or may designate the appropriate body or appropriate bodies, other than the public sector body itself, competent to lay down such criteria.
Merila bi lahko na primer določile v nacionalnih predpisih ali pa bi določile ustrezni organ ali ustrezne organe, pristojne za določitev teh meril, razen samega organa javnega sektorja.
That body should be organised in accordance with the constitutional and legal systems of the Member States.
Tak organ bi moral biti organiziran v skladu z ustavnim in pravnim sistemom držav članic.
It could be an existing body with budgetary executive powers and under political responsibility.
To bi lahko bil obstoječi organ s proračunskimi izvršnimi pooblastili in politično odgovornostjo.
In relation to any re-use that is made of the document, public sector bodies may impose conditions, where appropriate through a licence, such as acknowledgment of source and acknowledgment of whether the document has been modified by the re-user in any way.
V zvezi s ponovno uporabo dokumenta lahko organi javnega sektorja naložijo pogoje, kadar je to ustrezno, z dovoljenjem, kot je navedba vira ter tega, ali je ponovni uporabnik kakor koli spremenil dokument.
Any licences for the re-use of public sector information should in any event place as few restrictions on re-use as possible, for example limiting them to an indication of source.
Kakršna koli dovoljenja za ponovno uporabo informacij javnega sektorja morajo v vsakem primeru čim manj omejevati ponovno uporabo, na primer tako, da se omejitve nanašajo le na navedbo vira.
Open licences available online, which grant wider re-use rights without technological, financial or geographical limitations and relying on open data formats, should play an important role in this respect.
V zvezi s tem bi morala imeti pomembno vlogo odprta dovoljenja, na voljo preko spleta, ki zagotavljajo širše pravice do ponovne uporabe brez tehnoloških, finančnih ali zemljepisnih omejitev in ki temeljijo na formatih odprtih podatkov.
Therefore, Member States should encourage the use of open licences that should eventually become common practice across the Union.
Zato bi morale države članice spodbujati uporabo odprtih dovoljenj, ki bi sčasoma morala postati običajna praksa po vsej Uniji.
The Commission has supported the development of an online Public Sector Information scoreboard with relevant performance indicators for the re-use of public sector information in all the Member States.
Komisija podpira pripravo spletne preglednice informacij javnega sektorja, ki bi vsebovala ustrezne kazalnike uspešnosti ponovne uporabe informacij javnega sektorja v vseh državah članicah.
A regular update of this scoreboard will contribute to the exchange of information between the Member States and the availability of information on policies and practices across the Union.
Redno posodabljanje preglednice bo prispevalo k izmenjavi informacij med državami članicami in dostopnosti informacij o politikah in praksi v Uniji.
The means of redress should include the possibility of review by an impartial review body.
Pravna sredstva bi morala vključevati možnost preizkusa s strani nepristranskega organa za pritožbe.
That body could be an already existing national authority, such as the national competition authority, the national access to documents authority or a national judicial authority.
Ta organ bi lahko bil že obstoječi nacionalni organ, na primer nacionalni organ za varstvo konkurence, nacionalni organ za odobritev dostopa do dokumentov ali nacionalni sodni organ.
That body should be organised in accordance with the constitutional and legal systems of Member States and should not prejudge any means of redress otherwise available to applicants for re-use.
Organiziran bi moral biti v skladu z ustavnimi in pravnimi sistemi držav članic in ne bi smel prejudicirati drugih pravnih sredstev, ki so sicer na voljo vlagateljem za ponovno uporabo.
It should however be distinct from the Member State mechanism laying down the criteria for charging above marginal costs.
Moral pa bi se razlikovati od organa, ki določa merila za zaračunavanje nad mejnimi stroški.
The means of redress should include the possibility of review of negative decisions but also of decisions which, although permitting re-use, could still affect applicants on other grounds, notably by the charging rules applied.
Pravna sredstva bi morala vključevati možnost preizkusa negativnih odločitev, pa tudi odločitev, ki kljub temu, da dovoljujejo ponovno uporabo, lahko vseeno vplivajo na vlagatelje zaradi drugih razlogov, zlasti z uporabljenimi pravili o zaračunavanju.
The review process should be swift, in accordance with the needs of a rapidly changing market.
Postopek preizkusa bi moral biti hiter in v skladu s potrebami hitro spreminjajočega se trga.
Competition rules should be respected when establishing the principles for re-use of documents avoiding as far as possible exclusive agreements between public sector bodies and private partners.
Pri določanju načel za ponovno uporabo dokumentov bi bilo treba spoštovati pravila konkurence, pri čemer bi se bilo treba čim bolj izogibati izključnim sporazumom med organi javnega sektorja in zasebnimi partnerji.
However, in order to provide a service in the public interest, an exclusive right to re-use specific public sector documents may sometimes be necessary.
Vendar pa je izključna pravica do ponovne uporabe nekaterih dokumentov javnega sektorja včasih potrebna zaradi zagotavljanja storitev v javnem interesu.
This may be, inter alia, the case if no commercial publisher would publish the information without such an exclusive right.
To se lahko med drugim zgodi, če noben komercialni založnik ne bi hotel objaviti podatkov brez take izključne pravice.
In order to take this concern into account Directive 2003/98/EC authorises, subject to a regular review, exclusive arrangements where an exclusive right is necessary for the provision of a service in the public interest.
Zaradi upoštevanja tega pomisleka Direktiva 2003/98/ES dopušča izključne ureditve pod pogojem, da so predmet rednih pregledov, kadar je izključna pravica potrebna za zagotavljanje storitev v javnem interesu.
Following the extension of the scope of Directive 2003/98/EC to libraries, including university libraries, museums and archives, it is appropriate to take into account current divergences in the Member States with regard to digitisation of cultural resources, which could not be effectively accommodated by the current rules of that Directive on exclusive arrangements.
Po razširitvi področja uporabe Direktive 2003/98/ES na knjižnice, vključno z univerzitetnimi knjižnicami, muzeje in arhive je ustrezno upoštevati trenutne razlike v državah članicah glede digitalizacije kulturnih virov, ki jih ni bilo mogoče učinkovito razrešiti na podlagi sedanjih pravil o izključnih ureditvah iz te direktive.
There are numerous cooperation arrangements between libraries, including university libraries, museums, archives and private partners which involve digitisation of cultural resources granting exclusive rights to private partners.
Med knjižnicami, vključno z univerzitetnimi knjižnicami, muzeji, arhivi in zasebni partnerji so sklenjeni številni dogovori o sodelovanju, ki vključujejo digitalizacijo kulturnih virov in zasebnim partnerjem dajejo izključne pravice.
Practice has shown that such public-private partnerships can facilitate worthwhile use of cultural collections and at the same time accelerate access to the cultural heritage for members of the public.
V praksi se je pokazalo, da taka javno-zasebna partnerstva lahko omogočajo ustrezno uporabo kulturnih zbirk, hkrati pa pospešujejo dostopnost kulturne dediščine za javnost.
Where an exclusive right relates to digitisation of cultural resources, a certain period of exclusivity might be necessary in order to give the private partner the possibility to recoup its investment.
Kadar je izključna pravica povezana z digitalizacijo kulturnih virov, bo morebiti potrebno določeno obdobje izključnosti, da se zasebnemu partnerju lahko povrne naložba.
That period should, however, be limited in time and as short as possible, in order to respect the principle that public domain material should stay in the public domain once it is digitised.
Navedeno obdobje pa bi vseeno moralo biti omejeno in čim krajše, da se spoštuje načelo, po katerem bi moralo javno dostopno gradivo ostati dostopno javnosti tudi po digitalizaciji.
The period of an exclusive right to digitise cultural resources should in general not exceed 10 years.
Na splošno obdobje trajanja izključne pravice za digitalizacijo kulturnih virov ne bi smelo trajati več kot 10 let.
Any period of exclusivity longer than 10 years should be subject to review, taking into account technological, financial and administrative changes in the environment since the arrangement was entered into.
Obdobje izključnosti, daljše od 10 let, bi moralo biti predmet pregleda, pri katerem bi upoštevali tehnološke, finančne in upravne spremembe v okolju po sklenitvi ureditve.
In addition, any public private partnership for the digitisation of cultural resources should grant the partner cultural institution full rights with respect to the post-termination use of digitised cultural resources.
Poleg tega bi moralo vsako javno zasebno partnerstvo za digitalizacijo kulturnih virov partnerski kulturni instituciji zagotoviti vse pravice glede uporabe digitaliziranih kulturnih virov po koncu veljavnosti ureditve.
In order to take due account of contracts and other arrangements which grant exclusive rights and which were concluded before the entry into force of this Directive, appropriate transitional measures should be established to protect the interests of the parties concerned where their exclusive rights do not qualify for the exceptions authorised under this Directive.
Zaradi ustreznega upoštevanja pogodb in drugih ureditev, ki zagotavljajo izključne pravice in ki so bile sklenjene pred začetkom veljavnosti te direktive, je treba določiti primerne prehodne ukrepe, da se zaščitijo interesi zadevnih strank v primeru, če njihove izključne pravice ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za izjeme, ki jih omogoča ta direktiva.
Those transitional measures should allow for the parties’ exclusive rights to continue to exist until the end of the contract or, for open-ended contracts or contracts of a very long duration, to continue to exist for a sufficiently long period to allow the parties to take appropriate measures.
Ti prehodni ukrepi bi morali omogočati, da bodo izključne pravice strank veljale naprej vse do poteka pogodbe ali, v primeru pogodb, sklenjenih za nedoločen čas, ali pogodb z zelo dolgim rokom trajanja, še za dovolj dolgo obdobje, da bodo lahko stranke sprejele ustrezne ukrepe.
Those transitional measures should not apply to contracts or other arrangements concluded after the entry into force of this Directive but before the application of national measures transposing this Directive, in order to avoid situations whereby contracts or other long-term arrangements which do not comply with this Directive are concluded so as to circumvent future national transposition measures to be adopted.
Ti prehodni ukrepi se ne bi smeli uporabljati za pogodbe ali druge ureditve, sklenjene po začetku veljavnosti te direktive, vendar pred izvedbo nacionalnih ukrepov za prenos te direktive, da bi se izognili situacijam, ko bi se pogodbe ali druge dolgoročne ureditve, ki niso v skladu s to direktivo, sklepale z namenom, da se zaobidejo nacionalni ukrepi za prenos, ki bodo sprejeti v prihodnje.
Contracts and other arrangements concluded after the entry into force of this Directive but before the date of application of national transposition measures should therefore comply with this Directive as from the date of application of national measures transposing this Directive.
Pogodbe in druge ureditve, sklenjene po začetku veljavnosti te direktive, vendar pred začetkom uporabe nacionalnih ukrepov za prenos, bi torej morale upoštevati to direktivo vse od datuma začetka uporabe nacionalnih ukrepov za prenos te direktive.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to facilitate the creation of Union-wide information products and services based on public sector documents, to ensure the effective cross-border use of public sector documents on the one hand by private companies, particularly by small and medium-sized enterprises, for added-value information products and services, and on the other hand by citizens to facilitate the free circulation of information and communication, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can therefore, by reasons of the pan-European scope of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, tj. olajšati oblikovanje informacijskih izdelkov in storitev, ki temeljijo na dokumentih javnega sektorja, na ravni Unije, zagotoviti učinkovito čezmejno uporabo dokumentov javnega sektorja za informacijske izdelke in storitve z dodano vrednostjo, bodisi s strani zasebnih družb, predvsem malih in srednjih podjetij, bodisi s strani državljanov, da se omogoči prosto kroženje informacij in komunikacije, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in se zaradi vseevropskega obsega predlaganih ukrepov lahko lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, kakor je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principles of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including the protection of personal data (Article 8) and the right to property (Article 17).
Ta direktiva upošteva temeljne pravice in je skladna z načeli zlasti Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, vključno z varstvom osebnih podatkov (člen 8) in lastninsko pravico (člen 17).
Nothing in this Directive should be interpreted or implemented in a manner that is inconsistent with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Nobenega dela te direktive se ne sme razlagati ali izvajati na način, ki ni skladen z Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
It is necessary to ensure that the Member States report to the Commission on the extent of the re-use of public sector information, the conditions under which it is made available and the redress practices.
Zagotoviti je treba, da države članice Komisiji poročajo o obsegu ponovne uporabe informacij javnega sektorja, o pogojih, pod katerimi so na voljo, in o postopkih pravnega varstva.
The Commission should assist the Member States in implementing this Directive in a consistent way by issuing guidelines, particularly on recommended standard licences, datasets and charging for the re-use of documents, after consulting interested parties.
Komisija bi morala državam članicam pomagati pri doslednem izvajanju te direktive z izdajo smernic, zlasti glede priporočenih standardnih dovoljenj, podatkovnih zbirk in zaračunavanja za ponovno uporabo dokumentov, po posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi strankami.
Directive 2003/98/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Zato bi bilo treba Direktivo 2003/98/ES ustrezno spremeniti –
Directive 2003/98/EC is amended as follows:
Direktiva 2003/98/ES se spremeni:
documents the supply of which is an activity falling outside the scope of the public task of the public sector bodies concerned as defined by law or by other binding rules in the Member State, or in the absence of such rules, as defined in line with common administrative practice in the Member State in question, provided that the scope of the public tasks is transparent and subject to review;’;
dokumente, katerih zagotavljanje je dejavnost zunaj obsega javne naloge zadevnih organov javnega sektorja, kakor je opredeljena z zakonodajo ali drugimi obvezujočimi predpisi v državi članici ali, če takšnih predpisov ni, kakor je opredeljena v skladu z običajno upravno prakso v zadevni državi članici, pod pogojem, da je obseg javnih nalog pregleden in predmet pregledov;“;
documents which are excluded from access by virtue of the access regimes in the Member States, including on the grounds of:
dokumente, do katerih ni dostopa zaradi režima dostopa v državah članicah, vključno zaradi:
the protection of national security (i.e. State security), defence, or public security,
zaščite nacionalne varnosti (to je državne varnosti), obrambe ali javne varnosti,