natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions [3] and Directive 2006/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions [4] have been significantly amended on several occasions.
Direktiva 2006/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij [3] in Direktiva 2006/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o kapitalski ustreznosti investicijskih podjetij in kreditnih institucij [4] sta bili večkrat bistveno spremenjeni.
Many provisions of Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC are applicable to both credit institutions and investment firms.
Veliko določb iz direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES se uporablja za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja.
For the sake of clarity and in order to ensure a coherent application of those provisions, they should be merged into new legislative acts that are applicable to both credit institutions and investment firms, namely this Regulation and Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Zaradi jasnosti in zagotovitve usklajene uporabe teh določb, bi jih bilo treba združiti v nova zakonodajna akta, ki bi se uporabljala za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja, in sicer to uredbo in Direktivo 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne [5].
For greater accessibility, the provisions of the Annexes to Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC should be integrated into the enacting terms of Directive 2013/36/EU and this Regulation.
Zaradi večje dostopnosti bi morale biti določbe iz prilog k direktivama 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES vključene v normativni del Direktive 2013/36/EU in te uredbe.
Together, this Regulation and Directive 2013/36/EU should form the legal framework governing the access to the activity, the supervisory framework and the prudential rules for credit institutions and investment firms (referred to collectively as "institutions").
Ta uredba in Direktiva 2013/36/EU bi morala skupaj tvoriti pravni okvir, ki bi urejal dostop do dejavnosti, nadzorniški okvir ter bonitetna pravila za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj: institucije).
This Regulation should therefore be read together with that Directive
To uredbo bi zato bilo treba razlagati v povezavi z navedeno direktivo.
Directive 2013/36/EU, based on Article 53(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), should, inter alia, contain the provisions concerning the access to the activity of institutions, the modalities for their governance, and their supervisory framework, such as provisions governing the authorisation of the business, the acquisition of qualifying holdings, the exercise of the freedom of establishment and of the freedom to provide services, the powers of the competent authorities of the home and the host Member States in this regard and the provisions governing the initial capital and the supervisory review of institutions.
Direktiva 2013/36/EU, ki temelji na členu 53(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) bi morala med drugim vsebovati določbe o dostopu do dejavnosti institucij, načinih njihovega upravljanja ter njihovem nadzorniškem okviru, kot so določbe, ki urejajo izdajanje dovoljenj za poslovanje, pridobitev kvalificiranega deleža, uveljavljanje svobode ustanavljanja in svobode opravljanja storitev, pooblastila pristojnih organov matičnih držav članic in držav članic gostiteljic v zvezi s tem, ter določbe, ki urejajo ustanovni kapital in nadzorniški pregled institucij.
This Regulation should, inter alia, contain the prudential requirements for institutions that relate strictly to the functioning of banking and financial services markets and are meant to ensure the financial stability of the operators on those markets as well as a high level of protection of investors and depositors.
Ta uredba bi morala med drugim vsebovati bonitetne zahteve za institucije, ki se izrecno nanašajo na delovanje trgov bančnih in finančnih storitev ter katerih namen je zagotoviti finančno stabilnost udeležencev na teh trgih in visoko raven zaščite investitorjev in vlagateljev.
This Regulation aims at contributing in a determined manner to the smooth functioning of the internal market and should, consequently, be based on the provisions of Article 114 TFEU, as interpreted in accordance with the consistent case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Cilj te uredbe je odločilno prispevati k nemotenemu delovanju notranjega trga, zato bi morala temeljiti na določbah člena 114 PDEU, kot se razlagajo na podlagi dosledne sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije.
Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC, although having harmonised the rules of Member States in the area of prudential supervision to a certain degree, include a significant number of options and possibilities for Member States to impose stricter rules than those laid down by those Directives.
Čeprav so bila z direktivama 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES pravila držav članic na področju bonitetnega nadzora v določenem obsegu usklajena, ti direktivi vsebujeta precej opcij in možnosti, v skladu s katerimi lahko države članice še vedno uvajajo pravila, ki so strožja od pravil iz navedenih direktiv.
This results in divergences between national rules, which might hamper the cross-border provision of services and the freedom of establishment and so create obstacles to the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Posledica tega so razlike med nacionalnimi pravili, ki bi lahko ovirale čezmejno opravljanje storitev in omejevale svobodo ustanavljanja, s tem pa preprečevale nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga.
For reasons of legal certainty and because of the need for a level playing field within the Union, a single set of regulations for all market participants is a key element for the functioning of the internal market.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in enakih konkurenčnih pogojev v Uniji je enoten niz pravil za vse udeležence ključen za delovanje notranjega trga.
In order to avoid market distortions and regulatory arbitrage, prudential minimum requirements should therefore ensure maximum harmonisation.
Da bi preprečili izkrivljanje trga in regulativno arbitražo, bi bilo treba z ukrepi glede bonitetnega minimuma zagotoviti kar največjo uskladitev.
As a consequence, the transitional periods provided for in this Regulation are essential for the smooth implementation of this Regulation and to avoid uncertainty for the markets.
Prehodna obdobja iz te uredbe so zato nujno potrebna za njeno nemoteno izvajanje in za preprečitev negotovosti na trgih.
Having regard to work of the BCBS' Standards Implementation Group in monitoring and reviewing member countries' implementation of the Basel III framework, the Commission should provide update reports on an ongoing basis, and at least following the publication of each Progress Report by BCBS, on the implementation and domestic adoption of the Basel III framework in other major jurisdictions, including an assessment of the consistency of other countries' legislation or regulations with the international minimum standards, in order to identify differences that could raise level playing field concerns.
Ob upoštevanju dela skupine za izvajanje standardov pri Baselskem odboru za bančni nadzor (BCBS), ki spremlja in pregleduje izvajanje okvira Basel III v državah članicah, bi morala Komisija redno, zanesljivo pa po vsaki objavi poročila BCBS o napredku pri izvajanju okvira Basel III, pripravljati poročila o izvajanju in sprejemanju tega sporazuma v drugih velikih jurisdikcijah, vključno z oceno skladnosti zakonodaje ali predpisov drugih držav z minimalnimi mednarodnimi standardi, da bi tako odkrili razlike, ki bi lahko ogrozile enake konkurenčne pogoje.
In order to remove obstacles to trade and distortions of competition resulting from divergences between national laws and to prevent further likely obstacles to trade and significant distortions of competition from arising, it is therefore necessary to adopt a regulation establishing uniform rules applicable in all Member States.
Za odpravo ovir pri trgovini in izkrivljanja konkurence, ki so posledice razlik med nacionalnimi zakonodajami, ter za preprečitev nastanka morebitnih dodatnih ovir pri trgovini in znatnega izkrivljanja konkurence je treba sprejeti uredbo, s katero bodo vzpostavljena enotna pravila, ki bodo veljala v vseh državah članicah.
Shaping prudential requirements in the form of a regulation would ensure that those requirements will be directly applicable.
Z določitvijo bonitetnih zahtev v obliki uredbe bi se zagotovila neposredna uporaba teh zahtev.
This would ensure uniform conditions by preventing diverging national requirements as a result of the transposition of a directive.
S tem bi se zagotovili enotni pogoji, saj bi se preprečila morebitna uvedba različnih nacionalnih zahtev s prenosom direktive.
This Regulation would entail that all institutions follow the same rules in all the Union, which would also boost confidence in the stability of institutions, especially in times of stress.
S to uredbo bi se zagotovilo, da bi za vse institucije v celotni Uniji veljala enaka pravila, kar bi tudi povečalo zaupanje v stabilnost institucij zlasti v obdobju stresnih razmer.
A regulation would also reduce regulatory complexity and firms' compliance costs, especially for institutions operating on a cross-border basis, and contribute to eliminating competitive distortions.
Z uredbo bi se tudi zmanjšali regulativna zapletenost in stroški usklajevanja za podjetja, zlasti za institucije, ki poslujejo čezmejno, ter bi se prispevalo k odpravi izkrivljanja konkurence.
With regard to the peculiarity of immovable property markets which are characterised by economic developments and jurisdictional differences that are specific to Member States, regions or local areas, competent authorities should be allowed to set higher risks weights or to apply stricter criteria based on default experience and expected market developments to exposures secured by mortgages on immovable property in specific areas.
Kar zadeva posebnosti trgov nepremičnin, za katere so značilni različen gospodarski razvoj in različne sodne pristojnosti v posameznih državah članicah, regijah ali na lokalnih trgih, bi pristojni organi morali imeti možnost, da na posameznih območjih za izpostavljenosti, zavarovane s hipotekami na nepremičnine, na podlagi izkušenj z neplačili in pričakovanega razvoja na trgu določijo večje uteži tveganja ali uporabijo strožja merila.
In areas not covered by this Regulation, such as dynamic provisioning, provisions on national covered bonds schemes not related to the treatment of covered bonds under the rules established by this Regulation, acquisition and holding of participations in both the financial and non-financial sector for purposes not related to prudential requirements specified in this Regulation, competent authorities or Member States should be able to impose national rules, provided that they are not inconsistent with this Regulation.
Pristojni organi ali države članice bi morali imeti možnost, da na področjih, ki jih ta uredba ne ureja, kot na primer dinamične rezervacije in določbe o nacionalnih sistemih kritih obveznic, ki niso povezani z obravnavo kritih obveznic v skladu s pravili iz te uredbe, ter pridobivanje in imetništvo deležev v finančnem in nefinančnem sektorju za namene, ki niso povezani z bonitetnimi zadevami, določenimi v tej uredbi, uveljavijo nacionalna pravila, če ta niso neskladna s to uredbo.
The most important recommendations advocated in the de Larosière report and later implemented in the Union were the establishment of a singlerulebook and a European framework for macroprudential supervision where both elements in combination were aimed at ensuring financial stability.
Najpomembnejši priporočili iz de Larosièrjevega poročila, ki sta bili pozneje uveljavljeni v Uniji, sta priporočili o vzpostavitvi enotnega pravilnika in evropskega okvira makrobonitetnega nadzora, cilj obeh pa je bil zagotoviti finančno stabilnost.
The single rulebook ensures a robust and uniform regulatory framework facilitating the functioning of the internal market and prevents regulatory arbitrage opportunities.
Enotni pravilnik zagotavlja strog in enoten regulativni okvir, ki omogoča lažje delovanje notranjega trga in preprečuje možnosti za regulativno arbitražo.
Within the internal market for financial services, macroprudential risks may however differ in a number of ways with a range of national specificities resulting in variances being observed for example with regard to the structure and size of the banking sector compared to the wider economy and the credit cycle.
Makrobonitetna tveganja na notranjem trgu finančnih storitev pa se lahko v več pogledih razlikujejo; zaradi vrste nacionalnih posebnosti, kar je na primer mogoče opaziti kot razlike v strukturi in velikosti bančnega sektorja v primerjavi s širšim gospodarstvom in kreditnim ciklom.
A number of tools to prevent and mitigate macroprudential and systemic risks have been built into this Regulation and Directive 2013/36/EU ensuring flexibility while at the same time ensuring that the use of those tools are subject to appropriate control in order not to harm the function of the internal market while also ensuring that the use of such tools is transparent and consistent.
V Direktivo 2013/36/EU in to uredbo je vključenih več instrumentov za preprečevanje in zmanjševanje makrobonitetnih in sistemskih tveganj, ki zagotavljajo fleksibilnost, ter hkrati tudi ustrezen nadzor nad uporabo teh instrumentov, da ne bi ogrozili delovanja notranjega trga, ter pregledno in dosledno uporabo teh instrumentov.
Beyond the systemic risk buffer tool included in Directive 2013/36/EU, where macroprudential or systemic risks concern a Member State, the competent or designated authorities of the relevant Member State should have the possibility to address those risks by certain specific national macroprudential measures, when this is considered more effective to tackle those risks.
Če makrobonitetna ali sistemska tveganja zadevajo posamezno državo članico, bi morali pristojni ali imenovani organi zadevne države članice imeti možnost, da za odpravo teh tveganj poleg blažilnika sistemskih tveganj, ki je vključen v Direktivo 2013/36/EU, uporabijo nekatere specifične nacionalne makrobonitetne ukrepe, če menijo, da bi bilo to učinkoviteje.
The European Systemic Risk Board ("ESRB") established by Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 [6] and the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) ("EBA") established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 [7] should have the opportunity to provide their opinions on whether the conditions for such national macroprudential measures are met and there should be a Union mechanism to prevent national measures from proceeding, where there is very strong evidence that the relevant conditions are not satisfied.
Evropski odbor za sistemska tveganja (ESRB), ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 1092/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 [6] in Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ) (EBA), ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 [7] bi morala imeti možnost, da se izrečeta o tem, ali so pogoji za takšne nacionalne makrobonitetne ukrepe izpolnjeni, obstajati pa bi moral tudi mehanizem Unije, ki bi preprečil izvajanje nacionalnih ukrepov, če bi obstajali zelo očitni dokazi o neizpolnjevanju ustreznih pogojev.
Whilst this Regulation establishes uniform microprudential rules for institutions, Member States retain a leading role in macroprudential oversight because of their expertise and their existing responsibilities in relation to financial stability.
Čeprav so v tej uredbi določena enotna mikrobonitetna pravila za institucije, bi države članice zaradi svojega strokovnega znanja in obstoječe odgovornosti glede finančne stabilnosti morale ohraniti vodilno vlogo pri makrobonitetnem nadzoru.
In that specific case, since the decision to adopt any national macroprudential measures includes certain assessments in relation to risks which may ultimately affect the macroeconomic, fiscal and budgetary situation of the relevant Member State, it is necessary that the power to reject the proposed national macroprudential measures is conferred on the Council in accordance with Article 291 TFEU, acting on a proposal by the Commission.
Ker odločitev o sprejetju kakršnih koli nacionalnih makrobonitetnih ukrepov vključuje nekatere ocene v zvezi s tveganji, ki bi lahko odločilno vplivala na makroekonomsko, fiskalno in proračunsko stanje zadevne države članice, bi bilo treba v tem specifičnem primeru v skladu s členom 291 PDEU pooblastiti Svet, da bi lahko na predlog Komisije zavrnil predlagane nacionalne makrobonitetne ukrepe.
In accordance with Article 296 TFEU, the Council should state the reasons for its decision with respect to the conditions laid down in this Regulation for its intervention.
Svet bi v skladu s členom 296 PDEU moral obrazložiti svojo odločitev za ukrepanje v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem pogojev iz te uredbe.
Considering the importance of the macroprudential and systemic risk for the financial market of the Member State concerned and therefore the need for rapid reaction, it is important that the time limit for such a Council decision is set to one month.
Ker makrobonitetno in sistemsko tveganje pomembno vpliva na finančni trg zadevne države članice in bi bilo treba hitro ukrepati, je zelo pomembno, da se določi, da mora Svet odločitev sprejeti v enem mesecu.
If the Council, after having examined the proposal by the Commission to reject the proposed national measures in depth, comes to the conclusion that the conditions laid down in this Regulation for the rejection of the national measures were not fulfilled, it should always provide its reasons in a clear and unambiguous manner.
Če bi Svet po podrobni preučitvi predloga Komisije za zavrnitev predlaganega nacionalnega ukrepa ugotovil, da pogoji iz te uredbe, pod katerimi se lahko zavrnejo nacionalni ukrepi, niso izpolnjeni, bi moral to v vsakem takšnem primeru jasno in nedvoumno obrazložiti.
Until the harmonisation of liquidity requirements in 2015 and the harmonisation of a leverage ratio in 2018, Member States should be able to apply such measures as they consider appropriate, including measures to mitigate macroprudential or systemic risk in a specific Member State.
Države članice lahko do uskladitve likvidnostnih zahtev leta 2015 in do uskladitve količnika finančnega vzvoda leta 2018 uporabljajo ukrepe, za katere menijo, da so ustrezni, vključno z ukrepi za zmanjšanje makrobonitetnih in sistemskih tveganj v posamezni državi članici.
It should be possible to apply systemic risk buffers or individual measures taken by Member States to address systemic risks concerning those Member States, to the banking sector in general or to one or more subsets of the sector, meaning subsets of institutions that exhibit similar risk profiles in their business activities, or to the exposures to one or several domestic economic or geographic sectors across the banking sector.
Blažilniki sistemskih tveganj ali individualni ukrepi držav članic za odpravo sistemskih tveganj, ki zadevajo te države članice, se lahko uporabijo za bančni sektor na splošno ali za eno ali več podskupin tega sektorja, in sicer podskupin institucij, katerih poslovne dejavnosti imajo podobne profile tveganja, ali za izpostavljenosti do enega ali več domačih gospodarskih sektorjev ali geografskih območij v bančnem sektorju.
If two or more Member States' designated authorities identify the same changes in the intensity of systemic or macroprudential risk posing a risk to financial stability at the national level in each Member State which the designated authorities consider would better be addressed by means of national measures, the Member States may submit a joint notification to the Council, the Commission, the ESRB and EBA.
Če dva ali več imenovanih organov iz držav članic ugotovi enake spremembe v intenzivnosti makrobonitetnih in sistemskih tveganj, ki v vsaki od teh držav članic ogrožajo finančno stabilnost na nacionalni ravni in bi jih bilo treba po mnenju zadevnih organov obravnavati z nacionalnimi ukrepi, lahko zadevne države članice o tem skupaj uradno obvestijo Svet, Komisijo, ESRB in EBA.
When notifying the Council, the Commission, the ESRB and EBA Member States should submit relevant evidence, including a justification of the joint notification.
Uradnemu obvestilu Svetu, Komisiji, ESBR in EBA predložijo države članice tudi ustrezne dokaze, vključno z njegovo utemeljitvijo.
The Commission should furthermore be empowered to adopt a delegated act temporarily increasing the level of own funds requirements, requirements for large exposures and public disclosure requirements.
Komisija bi morala biti poleg tega pooblaščena za sprejetje delegiranega akta za začasno povečanje zahtev glede ravni kapitala, uteži tveganja, zahtev glede velikih izpostavljenosti in zahtev glede javnega razkritja.
Such provisions should be applicable for a period of one year, unless the European Parliament or the Council has objected to the delegated act within a period of three months.
Takšne določbe bi morale veljati največ eno leto, če Evropski parlament ali Svet v treh mesecih ne bi nasprotovala delegiranemu aktu.
The Commission should state the reasons for the use of such a procedure.
Komisija bi morala navesti razloge za uporabo takega postopka.
The Commission should only be empowered to impose stricter prudential requirements for exposures which arise from market developments in the Union or outside the Union affecting all Member States.
Komisija bi morala biti pooblaščena le za sprejemanje strožjih bonitetnih zahtev za izpostavljenosti, ki so posledica razvoja dogodkov na trgu v Uniji ali zunaj nje, ki vpliva na vse države članice.
A review of the macroprudential rules is justified in order for the Commission to assess, among other things, whether the macroprudential tools in this Regulation or Directive 2013/36/EU are effective, efficient and transparent, whether new instruments should be proposed, whether the coverage and the possible degrees of overlap of the macroprudential tools for targeting similar risks in this Regulation or Directive 2013/36/EU are appropriate and how internationally agreed standards for systemically important institutions interacts with this Regulation or Directive 2013/36/EU.
Da lahko Komisija med drugim oceni, ali so makrobonitetni instrumenti v tej uredbi ali v Direktivi 2013/36/EU učinkoviti, uspešni in pregledni, ali bi bilo treba predlagati nove instrumente, ali sta obseg delovanja in stopnja morebitnega prekrivanja makrobonitetnih instrumentov iz te uredbe ali Direktive 2013/36/EU za odkrivanje podobnih tveganj ustrezna ter kakšen je vzajemni učinek mednarodno dogovorjenih standardov za sistemske institucije in to uredbo ali Direktivo2013/36/EU, je pregled makrobonitetnih pravil upravičen.
Where Member States adopt guidelines of general scope, in particular in areas where the adoption by the Commission of draft technical standards is pending, those guidelines shall neither contradict Union law nor undermine its application.
Kadar države članice sprejmejo smernice, ki se splošno uporabljajo, zlasti na področjih, na katerih Komisija še ni sprejela osnutkov tehničnih standardov, te smernice niso v nasprotju z zakonodajo Unije in ne vplivajo negativno na njeno uporabo.
This Regulation does not prevent Member States from imposing, where appropriate, equivalent requirements on undertakings that do not fall within its scope.
Ta uredba državam članicam ne preprečuje uvedbe enakovrednih zahtev za podjetja, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe te uredbe, če je to ustrezno.