natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The two users from the food sector that cooperated in the investigation claimed that the impact of the continuation of the measures on the food industry had not been sufficiently considered, and one of them requested a hearing with the Hearing Officer.
Uporabnika iz živilskega sektorja, ki sta sodelovala v preiskavi, sta trdila, da vpliv nadaljevanja ukrepov na živilsko industrijo ni bil ustrezno upoštevan, eden od njiju pa je zahteval zaslišanje pri pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
During the hearing, this user did not disagree with the conclusion that the continuation of the measures would overall not negatively affect the profitability of the company as a whole but claimed that the impact on the profitability of the specific production line using the product concerned, which represents only a minor percentage of the total turnover, would be in their view significant.
Med zaslišanjem ta uporabnik ni nasprotoval sklepu, da nadaljevanje ukrepov na splošno ne bi negativno vplivalo na dobičkonosnost družbe kot celote, ampak je trdil, da bi bil vpliv na dobičkonosnost določene proizvodne linije, pri kateri se uporablja zadevni izdelek in ki predstavlja le majhen odstotek celotnega prihodka od prodaje, po mnenju družbe znaten.
It also claimed that domestic prices for tartaric acid had considerably increased after the review investigation period and that these price levels would again significantly reduce their product profitability.
Trdil je tudi, da so se domače cene za vinsko kislino bistveno povišale po obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in da bi te ravni cen spet znatno znižale dobičkonosnost prodaje izdelka družbe.
Nevertheless this user did not deny that the price increase was a result of a lack of raw material supply on the Union market whose level fluctuates regularly depending on the wine harvest and cannot therefore be considered as lasting nor being caused by the anti-dumping measures in force.
Vendar pa ta uporabnik ni zanikal, da je povišanje cene posledica pomanjkanja surovin na trgu Unije, katerih dobava vseskozi niha glede na vinsko letino, zato se to povišanje ne more obravnavati kot trajno ali kot posledica veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
The other cooperating user, during a hearing with the investigation team, argued against the extension of the measures with arguments of similar nature.
Drugi sodelujoči uporabnik je na zaslišanju pri skupini za zaslišanje nasprotoval podaljšanju ukrepov s podobnimi argumenti.
Therefore, these arguments were similarly rejected (see the previous recital).
Zato so bili tudi ti argumenti zavrnjeni (glej prejšnjo uvodno izjavo).
A cooperating Chinese exporting producer argued that the Union industry could not be considered as still being vulnerable, that the essential cause influencing the Union industry situation was closely associated with climatic conditions and that, in consequence, it was against the continuation of the measures.
Sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da se industrija Unije ne more še vedno obravnavati kot ranljiva, da je bistveni razlog za sedanji položaj industrije Unije tesno povezan s podnebnimi razmerami, zato nasprotuje nadaljevanju ukrepov.
These claims were not supported by evidence and hence could not be accepted.
Te trditve niso bile podkrepljene z dokazi in jih zato ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
Furthermore, they were not of a nature as to change the findings as to the situation of the Union industry.
Poleg tega ne bi mogle spremeniti ugotovitev glede položaja industrije Unije.
Finally the Union industry, in consideration of its profitability figures during the period considered, justified that the closure in mid-2008 of the sole French producer had, in the short run, diminished the quantity of product concerned available in the domestic market, thus temporarily increasing sales prices and, accordingly, increasing their profitability.
Nazadnje je industrija Unije svoje podatke o dobičkonosnosti v obravnavanem obdobju utemeljila s tem, da je zaprtje edinega francoskega proizvajalca sredi leta 2008 kratkoročno zmanjšalo količino zadevnega izdelka, na voljo na domačem trgu, zato so se začasno povišale prodajne cene ter s tem tudi dobičkonosnost industrije Unije.
The Union industry argued that given these circumstances, these changes could not in any case be considered as been of a lasting nature.
Industrija Unije je trdila, da se v danih okoliščinah te spremembe v nobenem primeru ne morejo obravnavati kot trajne.
Thus, the findings as regard the situation of the Union industry remain unchanged.
Zato ostajajo ugotovitve glede položaja industrije Unije nespremenjene.
In summary, after having considered all the comments submitted following disclosure to interested parties of the conclusions of the investigation, it was considered that none of them was of such a nature as to change the conclusions reached during the investigation.
Po obravnavi vseh pripomb, ki so bile predložene po razkritju sklepov preiskave zainteresiranim stranem, je bilo ugotovljeno, da nobena pripomba ni bila takšna, da bi lahko spremenila ugotovitve preiskave.
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of tartaric acid originating in China should be maintained for an additional period of five years,
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, da je treba v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz vinske kisline s poreklom iz Kitajske, ohraniti še za obdobje petih let –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of tartaric acid, excluding D-(-)-tartaric acid with a negative optical rotation of at least 12,0 degrees, measured in a water solution according to the method described in the European Pharmacopoeia, currently falling within CN code ex29181200 (TARIC code 2918120090) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz vinske kisline, razen vinske kisline D-(-)- z negativno optično rotacijo najmanj 12,0 stopinj, ki se meri v raztopini vode v skladu z metodo, opisano v evropski farmakopeji, trenutno uvrščene pod oznako KN ex29181200 (oznaka TARIC 2918120090), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable, to the net free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, for the products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne veljavne protidampinške dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj navedene družbe, je:
Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd, Changzou City, People’s Republic of China
Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co., Ltd, Changzou City, Ljudska republika Kitajska
All other companies (except Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd, Hangzhou City, People’s Republic of China — TARIC additional code A687)
Vse druge družbe (razen družbe Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co., Ltd, Hangzhou City, Ljudska republika Kitajska – dodatna oznaka TARIC A687)
The application of the individual duty rates specified for the companies mentioned in paragraph 2 shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex.
Uporaba individualnih stopenj dajatve, ki so določene za družbe iz odstavka 2, je pogojena s predložitvijo veljavnega trgovinskega računa carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladen z zahtevami iz Priloge.
OJ L 108, 20.4.2012, p. 1.
UL L 108, 20.4.2012, str. 1.
OJ C 223, 29.7.2011, p. 16.
UL C 223, 29.7.2011, str. 16.
Like the Chemical Economic Handbook (CEH), or reports from CCM International Ltd.
Na primer „Chemical Economic Handbook (CEH)“ ali poročila CCM International LTD.
Source: Chinese exports’ database.
Vir: Podatkovna zbirka kitajskega izvoza.
A declaration signed by an official of the entity issuing the commercial invoice, in the following format, must appear on the valid commercial invoice referred to in Article 1(3): The name and function of the official of the entity which has issued the commercial invoice.
Veljaven trgovinski račun iz člena 1(3) mora vključevati izjavo, ki jo podpiše uslužbenec subjekta, ki izda veljaven trgovinski račun, v naslednji obliki: ime in položaj uslužbenca subjekta, ki je izdal trgovinski račun.
The following declaration: ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (volume) of tartaric acid sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in (country concerned). I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’
Naslednja izjava: „Podpisani(-a) potrjujem, da je (količina) vinske kisline, prodane za izvoz v Evropsko unijo, zajete v tem trgovinskem računu, proizvedla družba (ime in naslov subjekta) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) v (zadevna država). Izjavljam, da so informacije v tem računu popolne in pravilne.“
In details, the apparent demand went down from 2007 to 2009 by 15 %.
Očitno povpraševanje se je med letoma 2007 in 2009 zmanjšalo za 15 %.
However, during the RIP the Union consumption reached 29964 tonnes, representing a significant increase of 26 percentage points as compared to the previous year.
Toda v OPP je potrošnja Unije dosegla 29964 ton, kar pomeni znatno povečanje za 26 odstotnih točk v primerjavi s prejšnjim letom.
More specifically, it increased by 19 percentage points between 2009 and RIP to around 30,5 thousand MT, following a sharp decrease between 2007 and 2009 of 14 %.
Med letom 2009 in OPP se je povečala za 19 odstotnih točk na približno 30500 ton, potem ko je med letoma 2007 in 2009 močno upadla za 14 %.
Increased production levels have allowed the Union industry to contain the increase of production costs and had a positive impact on the overall Union industry profitability.
Zaradi povečane proizvodnje je industrija Unije lahko obvladovala povišanje proizvodnih stroškov, kar je pozitivno vplivalo na celotno dobičkonosnost industrije Unije.
The annual average sales prices of the sampled producers on the Union market to unrelated customers increased by 8 % between 2007 and 2009, however, they decreased by 6 % during the period considered as in the RIP the annual average sale price reached 2496 EUR/tonne from 2667 EUR/tonne in 2007.
Letne povprečne prodajne cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev na trgu Unije, ki se zaračunavajo nepovezanim strankam, so se med letoma 2007 in 2009 povišale za 8 %, vendar so se v obravnavanem obdobju spet znižale za 6 %, saj se je v OPP letna povprečna prodajna cena znižala na 2496 EUR/tono v primerjavi z letom 2007, ko je bila cena 2667 EUR/tono.
The availability of calcium tartrate, which is produced out of wine lees and represents 66 % of total costs of manufacturing of TA, varies according to the quality of the grape wine harvest.
Dostopnost kalcijevega tartrata, ki se izdeluje iz vinske usedline in predstavlja 66 % skupnih stroškov proizvodnje vinske kisline, je odvisna od kakovosti vinske letine.
It decreased from a level of 36,4 % in 2007 to 21,9 % in 2008.
S 36,4 % leta 2007 se je leta 2008 zmanjšala na 21,9 %.
It increased to 44,4 % in 2009 and increased again in the RIP to 142,9 %.
Leta 2009 se je povečala na 44,4 %, v OPP pa se je znova povečala na 142,9 %.
The net cash flow from operating activities was positive at EUR 4,6 million in 2007. It dropped to EUR 1,8 million in 2008 and improved significantly until the end of the period considered to reach a level of EUR 6,8 million in the RIP. Overall, cash flow has been constantly positive in the period considered.
Neto denarni tok iz poslovanja je bil leta 2007 pozitiven, in sicer 4,6 milijona EUR. Leta 2008 se je zmanjšal na 1,8 milijona EUR, do konca obravnavanega obdobja pa se je znatno izboljšal ter v OPP dosegel 6,8 milijona EUR. Na splošno je bil denarni tok v obravnavanem obdobju nenehno pozitiven.
More specifically, it increased by 5 % between 2007 and 2008 and then it further increased by 32 percentage points in 2009.
Med letoma 2007 in 2008 so se povečale za 5 %, nato pa leta 2009 še za 32 odstotnih točk.
The sharp drop in investments observed between 2009 and the RIP (– 60 percentage points) can be partially explained by the fact that investigated companies had already during the period considered achieved their necessary scheduled main investments.
Strm padec naložb med letom 2009 in OPP (za 60 odstotnih točk) je mogoče delno pojasniti s tem, da so preiskovane družbe v obravnavanem obdobju svoje najpomembnejše načrtovane glavne naložbe že izvedle.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 350/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 350/2012
implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran
o izvajanju Uredbe (EU) št. 267/2012 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Iranu
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, and in particular Article 46(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 267/2012 z dne 23. marca 2012 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Iranu in zlasti člena 46(2) Uredbe,
On 23 March 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 267/2012.
Svet je 23. marca 2012 sprejel Uredbo (EU) št. 267/2012.
The Council considers that there are no longer grounds for keeping one person and two entities on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012.
Svet meni, da ni več razlogov, da bi bile ena osebe in dva subjekta] še naprej vključeni na seznam fizičnih in pravnih oseb, subjektov in organov, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, iz Priloge IX k Uredbi (EU) št. 267/2012.
The list set out in Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Seznam iz Priloge IX k Uredbi (EU) št. 267/2012 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
The person and entities listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012.
Oseba in subjekta, navedeni v Prilogi k tej uredbi, se črtajo s seznama iz Priloge IX k Uredbi (EU) št. 267/2012.
OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1.
UL L 88, 24.3.2012, str. 1.
PERSON AND ENTITIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1
OSEBA IN SUBJEKTA IZ ČLENA 1
Commission Regulation (EU) No 351/2012
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 351/2012
implementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards type-approval requirements for the installation of lane departure warning systems in motor vehicles
o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede zahtev za homologacijo za vgradnjo sistema opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu v motorna vozila
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor [1], and in particular Article 14(1)(a) and Article 14(3)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o zahtevah za homologacijo za splošno varnost motornih vozil, njihovih priklopnikov ter sistemov, sestavnih delov in samostojnih tehničnih enot, namenjenih za taka vozila [1], in zlasti člena 14(1)(a) in 14(3)(a) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 lays down basic requirements for the type-approval of motor vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 with regard to the installation of lane departure warning systems.
Uredba (ES) št. 661/2009 določa osnovne zahteve za homologacijo motornih vozil kategorij M2, M3, N2 in N3 v zvezi z vgradnjo sistema opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu.
It is necessary to set out the specific procedures, tests and requirements for such type-approval.
Določiti je treba posebne postopke, preskuse in zahteve za tako homologacijo.
Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 provides that the Commission may adopt measures exempting certain vehicles or classes of vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 from the obligation to install lane departure warning systems, where following a cost/benefit analysis and taking into account all relevant safety aspects, the application of those systems proves not to be appropriate to the vehicle or class of vehicles concerned.
Uredba (ES) št. 661/2009 določa, da lahko Komisija sprejme ukrepe za izvzetje nekaterih vozil ali razredov vozil kategorij M2, M3, N2 in N3 iz obveznosti vgradnje sistemov opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu, če je bilo po analizi stroškov in koristi ter ob upoštevanju vseh zadevnih varnostnih vidikov dokazano, da ti sistemi niso primerni za omenjena vozila oziroma razrede vozil.
The cost/benefit analysis has proven that the application of lane departure warning systems to semi-trailer towing vehicles of category N2 with a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes but not exceeding 8 tonnes is not appropriate as it would generate more costs than benefits.
Analiza stroškov in koristi je dokazala, da uporaba sistemov opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu ni primerna za vlačilce polpriklopnikov kategorije N2 z največjo maso med 3,5 tone in 8 tonami, ker bi ustvarila več stroškov kot koristi.
In addition, it is considered that due to their typical use in specific traffic conditions, the installation of lane departure warning systems would generate only limited safety benefits for category M2 and M3 vehicles of Class A, Class I and Class II, and for articulated buses of category M3 of Class A, Class I and Class II, as well as for certain special purpose vehicles, off-road vehicles and vehicles with more than three axles.
Poleg tega se šteje, da bi namestitev sistemov opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu imela le omejene koristi za varnost vozil razreda A, razreda I in razreda II kategorij M2 in M3, zgibnih avtobusov razreda A, razreda I in razreda II kategorije M3 ter nekaterih vozil za posebne namene, terenskih vozil in vozil z več kot tremi osmi zaradi njihove značilne uporabe v posebnih prometnih razmerah.
Those vehicles should therefore be exempted from the obligation to install those systems.
Navedena vozila je zato treba izvzeti iz obveznosti namestitve teh sistemov.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Technical Committee – Motor Vehicles,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem tehničnega odbora za motorna vozila –
This Regulation applies to vehicles of categories M2, N2, M3 and N3, as defined in Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], with the exception of the following:(1) semi-trailer towing vehicles of category N2 with a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes but not exceeding 8 tonnes;
Ta uredba se uporablja za vozila kategorij M2, N2, M3 in N3, kot so opredeljene v Prilogi II k Direktivi 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], razen za:1. vlačilce polpriklopnikov kategorije N2 z največjo maso med 3,5 tone in 8 tonami;
off-road vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 as referred to in points 4.2 and 4.3 of Part A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC;
terenska vozila kategorij M2, M3, N2 in N3, kot so navedena v točkah 4.2 in 4.3 dela A Priloge II k Direktivi 2007/46/ES;
special purpose vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 as referred to in point 5 of Part A of Annex II to Directive 2007/46/EC;
vozila za posebne namene kategorij M2, M3, N2 in N3, kot so navedena v točki 5 dela A Priloge II k Direktivi 2007/46/ES;
‘vehicle type with regard to its Lane Departure Warning System’ means a category of vehicles which do not differ in such essential respects as:
„tip vozila glede na sistem opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu“ pomeni kategorijo vozil, ki se ne razlikujejo v bistvenih značilnostih, kot so:
the manufacturer’s trade name or mark;
blagovna znamka proizvajalca;
vehicle features which significantly influence the performances of the Lane Departure Warning System;
lastnosti vozila, ki bistveno vplivajo na delovanje sistema opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu;
the type and design of the Lane Departure Warning System;
tip in zasnova sistema opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu;
‘lane’ means one of the longitudinal strips into which a roadway is divided (as shown in the Appendix to Annex II);
„vozni pas“ pomeni enega od vzdolžnih pasov, na katere je razdeljeno cestišče (kot je prikazano v Dodatku k Prilogi II);
‘visible lane marking’ means delineators intentionally placed on the borderline of the lane that are directly visible by the driver while driving;
„vidna označba voznega pasu“ pomeni razmejitvene označbe, ki so namenoma nameščene na mejno črto voznega pasu in so neposredno vidne vozniku med vožnjo;
‘rate of departure’ means the subject vehicle’s approach velocity at a right angle to the visible lane marking at the warning issue point;
„hitrost zapustitve voznega pasu“ pomeni hitrost približevanja zadevnega vozila pravokotno na vidno označbo voznega pasu ob sprožitvi opozorila;
‘common space’ means an area on which two or more information functions may be displayed, but not simultaneously.
„skupni prostor“ pomeni območje, kjer sta lahko prikazani dve informacijski funkciji ali več, vendar ne hkrati.
EC type-approval of a type of vehicle with regard to LDWS
ES-homologacija tipa vozila glede na sistem opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu
The manufacturer or his representative shall submit to the type-approval authority the application for EC type-approval of a vehicle with regard to lane departure warning systems.
Proizvajalec ali njegov zastopnik pri homologacijskem organu vloži vlogo za ES-homologacijo vozila v zvezi s sistemi opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu.
For the purposes of paragraph 3, the type-approval authority shall issue an EC type-approval certificate established in accordance with the model set out in Part 2 of Annex I.
Za namene odstavka 3 homologacijski organ izda certifikat o ES-homologaciji, pripravljen v skladu z vzorcem iz dela 2 Priloge I.
Standard models for the information document and the EC type-approval certificate
Standardni vzorci opisnega lista in certifikata o ES-homologaciji
Information document No … relating to the EC type-approval of a vehicle with regard to lane departure warning systems.
Opisni list št. … o ES-homologaciji vozila v zvezi s sistemi opozarjanja pred zapustitvijo voznega pasu
The following information shall be supplied in triplicate and include a list of contents.
Naslednji podatki se predložijo v treh izvodih in morajo vsebovati seznam priloženih dokumentov.
Any drawings shall be supplied in appropriate scale and in sufficient detail on size A4 or on a folder of A4 format.
Vse risbe morajo biti v ustreznem merilu in dovolj podrobne ter v formatu A4 ali zložene na format A4.
If the systems, components or separate technical units referred to in this Annex have electronic controls, information concerning their performance shall be supplied.
Če so sistemi, sestavni deli ali samostojne tehnične enote iz te priloge upravljani elektronsko, je treba predložiti podatke o njihovem delovanju.
Bodywork/complete vehicle: …
Nadgradnja/dokončano vozilo: …
Location and method of attachment of statutory plates and location of vehicle identification number: …
Mesto in način pritrditve predpisanih napisnih tablic in mesto identifikacijske številke vozila: …
On the bodywork: …
Na nadgradnji: …
Hand of drive: left/right.
Lega volana: levo/desno
(in kg and mm) (Refer to drawing where applicable)
(v kg in mm) (navesti sklic na risbo, kadar je to primerno)
Track of all other axles [7] ( g4)
Kolotek vseh drugih osi [7] ( g4)
The track of axles shall be determined in accordance with item No 6.5. of Standard ISO 612:1978
Kolotek osi se določi v skladu z definicijo št. 6.5 standarda ISO 612:1978.
g5) vehicle length shall be determined in accordance with:item No 6.1. of Standard ISO 612:1978 for vehicles of category M1:point 2.4.1. of Annex I to Directive 97/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [9] for vehicles other than those of category M1
g5) Dolžina vozila se določi v skladu z:definicijo št. 6.1 standarda ISO 612:1978 za vozila kategorije M1;točko 2.4.1 Priloge I k Direktivi 97/27/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9] za vozila, ki niso kategorije M1.