natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The general section of AIP also deals with Finavia’s air traffic charges.
Splošni del AIP obravnava tudi pristojbine družbe Finavia za zračni promet.
Assuming that MTOW of the aircraft is 69900 kg.
Če je največja vzletna masa letala 69900 kg.
This charge is collected by Eurocontrol and disbursed by it to Finavia.
To pristojbino zaračuna družba Eurocontrol, ki jo izplača družbi Finavia.
In order to carry out its assessment the Commission ordered a study from Ecorys (‘the Commission’s expert’).
Da bi Komisija lahko izvedla oceno, je pri družbi Ecorys (v nadaljnjem besedilu: strokovnjak Komisije) naročila izvedbo študije.
The Commission’s expert analysed the financial data and assumptions underpinning the business plan for the low-cost strategy of Finavia and Airpro, the lease agreement between Finavia and Airpro for the operation of T2, and the agreement.
Strokovnjak Komisije je analiziral finančne podatke in predpostavke, na katerih temeljijo poslovni načrt družb Finavia in Airpro za strategijo zniževanja stroškov, zakupna pogodba med družbama Finavia in Airpro v zvezi z delovanjem T2 ter sporazum.
Case C-305/89 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1603, paragraph 20 (the ‘Alfa Romeo’ case); Case T-296/97 Alitalia v Commission [2000] ECR II-3871, paragraph 84.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italijanska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti (C-305/89, Recueil, str. I-1603, točka 20 (zadeva „Alfa Romeo“)); sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 12. decembra 2000 v zadevi Alitalia - Linee aeree italiane SpA proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti (T-296/97, Recueil str. II-3871, točka 84).
Case T-196/04 Ryanair v Commission [2008] ECR II-3643, paragraph 59 (the ‘Charleroi’ case).
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 17. decembra 2008 v zadevi Ryanair Ltd proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti (T-196/04, ZOdl., str. II-3643, točka 59 (zadeva „Charleroi“)).
Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraph 71 (the ‘Stardust Marine’ case).
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francoska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti (C-482/99, Recueil str. I-4397, točka 71 (zadeva „Stardust Marine“)).
The profit margin (the return on sales) compares the net profit to sales (revenues).
Stopnja dobička (donos prodaje) primerja neto dobiček s prodajo (prihodki).
This ratio shows whether an undertaking’s return on sales is sufficient, as it determines how much profit is being produced for one euro of sales revenue; it is an indicator of profitability and efficiency.
To razmerje kaže, ali je donos prodaje podjetja zadosten, saj določa, kolikšen dobiček je ustvarjen na en euro prihodka od prodaje; je kazalnik dobičkonosnosti in učinkovitosti.
See Table 6 of Commission Decision of 27 January 2010 in State aid case C 12/2008 Slovakia – agreement between Bratislava Airport and Ryanair, OJ L 27, 1.2.2011, p. 24.
Glej preglednico 6 iz Sklepa Komisije z dne 27. januarja 2010 o državni pomoči C 12/2008 – Slovaška – Sporazum med letališčem Bratislava in družbo Ryanair, UL L 27, 1.2.2011, str. 24.
The NPV indicates whether the income from a given project exceeds the (opportunity) costs of capital.
Neto sedanja vrednost navaja, ali prihodki danega projekta presegajo (oportunitetne) stroške kapitala.
A project is considered an economically profitable investment when it generates a positive NPV.
Če projekt ustvarja pozitivno neto sedanjo vrednost, se šteje za gospodarsko učinkovito naložbo.
Investments producing lower income than the (opportunity) costs of capital are not economically profitable.
Naložbe, katerih prihodki so nižji od (oportunitetnih) stroškov kapitala, niso gospodarsko učinkovite.
The (opportunity) costs of capital are reflected in the discount rate.
(Oportunitetni) stroški kapitala so izraženi v diskontni stopnji.
Alfa Romeo, paragraph 20, Alitalia v Commission, paragraph 84.
Zadeva Alfa Romeo, točka 20; zadeva Alitalia proti Komisiji, točka 84.
Charleroi, paragraph 59.
Zadeva Charleroi, točka 59.
Finland replied by letter dated 1 July 2010.
Finska je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 1. julija 2010.
By letter dated 5 April 2011 the Commission requested further information on the financing of the airport.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 5. aprila 2011 zahtevala dodatne informacije o financiranju letališča.
T2 at TMP airport was actively marketed at the Routes trade fair [11] for several years starting in 2002.
T2 na letališču TMP se je od leta 2002 več let aktivno tržil na trgovinskem sejmu Routes [11].
It was assumed that other airlines, in addition to Ryanair, would also be interested in establishing their operations at this terminal.
Predvidevalo se je, da bodo poleg družbe Ryanair tudi druge letalske družbe zainteresirane za vzpostavitev dejavnosti na tem terminalu.
For services provided at TMP airport Ryanair is to pay a single charge for each aircraft turnaround (departure and arrival), i.e. an all-inclusive charge, for each B737-800 aircraft or other variant of the B-737 aircraft with a maximum MTOW [12] of 67000 kg as from 4 April 2003.
Družba Ryanair za storitve na letališču TMP od 4. aprila 2003 plačuje eno pristojbino za posamezno obračanje letala (odhod in prihod), tj. pavšalno pristojbino, in sicer za vsako letalo B737-800 ali letalo druge različice B-737 z največjo vzletno maso [12]67000 kg.
This charge includes the landing and take-off charge, lighting charges, noise and night fees, the terminal navigation charge, ramp and passenger handling charges including the security and safety charges, and the passenger charge.
Ta pristojbina vključuje pristajalno in vzletno pristojbino, pristojbino za razsvetljavo, pristojbino za hrup, nočno pristojbino, pristojbino za navigacijske storitve na terminalu, pristojbino za oskrbo ploščadi in potnikov, vključno s pristojbinami za varovanje in varnost, in potniško pristojbino.
Pursuant to the agreement, T2 at TMP airport has a maximum capacity of one turnaround an hour between 7:00 and 24:00.
Glede na sporazum je največja zmogljivost T2 na letališču TMP eno obračanje letala na uro, in sicer med 7:00 in 24:00.
Ryanair and Airpro will agree beforehand on the flight schedules.
Družbi Ryanair in Airpro se o urnikih letov dogovorita vnaprej.
SAS Group submitted its comments by letter dated 16 November 2007.
Skupina SAS je pripombe predložila z dopisom z dne 16. novembra 2007.
SAS Group pointed out that its comments focused on the link between Finavia and Airpro, the costs of the conversion of T2, and the preferential treatment of Ryanair at TMP airport.
Skupina SAS je izpostavila, da se je v pripombah osredotočila na povezavo med družbama Finavia in Airpro, stroške za preoblikovanje T2 in prednostno obravnavo družbe Ryanair na letališču TMP.
Air France provided comments by letter dated 16 November 2007.
Družba Air France je predložila pripombe z dopisom z dne 16. novembra 2007.
The Association of European Airlines (‘AEA’) provided its comments by letter of 16 November 2007.
Združenje evropskih letalskih prevoznikov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: AEA) je pripombe predložilo z dopisom z dne 16. novembra 2007.
AEA’s comments were entirely in line with those provided by SAS Group and Air France.
Pripombe AEA so bile popolnoma v skladu s pripombami, ki sta jih predložili skupina SAS in družba Air France.
TMP airport’s managing director was on Airpro’s board of directors only from May 2003 to April 2007.
Izvršni direktor letališča TMP je bil član upravnega odbora Airpro le od maja 2003 do aprila 2007.
As regards the marketing publication concerning TMP airport and its low-cost strategy, Finland argued that such marketing operations could not prejudge the legal and economic links between the companies concerned.
V zvezi z reklamno publikacijo glede letališča TMP in njegove strategije zniževanja stroškov je Finska navedla, da ni mogoče na podlagi takšnih reklamnih dejavnosti vnaprej predvidevati pravnih in gospodarskih povezav med zadevnima družbama.
In order to be able to apply the market economy investor test the Commission has to place itself in the context of the period when Finavia took the decision to refurbish the vacant cargo hangar and subsequently to rent it out to Airpro i.e. the beginning of 2003.
Da bi Komisija lahko izvedla preizkus vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, mora upoštevati razmere iz obdobja, v katerem se je družba Finavia odločila za prenovo praznega tovornega hangarja in pozneje za oddajo tega hangarja v najem družbi Airpro, tj. začetka leta 2003.
The Commission must also base its assessment on the information and assumptions which were at the disposal of the operator when the decisions on the financial arrangements for the implementation of the low-cost strategy were taken.
Komisija mora pri oceni upoštevati tudi informacije in predpostavke, ki so bile na voljo upravljavcu letališča, ko je sprejel odločitve o finančnih ureditvah za izvajanje strategije zniževanja stroškov.
Finland replied by letter dated 5 May 2011.
Finska je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 5. maja 2011.
However, Finland’s reply was incomplete.
Vendar odgovor je bil nepopoln.
Air France started by explaining its commercial situation in Finland.
Na začetku je pojasnila svoj poslovni položaj na Finskem.
Passenger traffic at the airport increased from 304025 in 2003 to 617397 in 2010.
Potniški promet na letališču se je s 304025 potnikov leta 2003 povečal na 617397 potnikov leta 2010.
This is due to the development of passenger numbers at T2.
Razlog za to je povečanje števila potnikov na T2.
In view of the above calculation Finland indicated that even if Finavia had been able to find another tenant to use T2 as a cargo hangar, it would have been necessary to carry out certain construction engineering works amounting to approximately EUR 100000.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega izračuna je Finska navedla, da bi bila izvedba nekaterih del gradbenega inženirstva, katerih stroški bi znašali približno 100000 EUR, nujna, tudi če bi družba Finavia lahko našla drugega najemnika, ki bi T2 uporabljal kot tovorni hangar.
Furthermore, the conveyors could always be used at Finavia’s other airports.
Poleg tega bi se lahko transportni trakovi v vsakem primeru uporabili na drugih letališčih družbe Finavia.
T2 was open in a fair and non-discriminatory manner to all airlines. So far, however, no airline but Ryanair had shown interest in it.
T2 je bil na pošten in nediskriminacijski način odprt za vse letalske družbe, vendar je do zdaj interes zanj pokazala le družba Ryanair.
Air France
Družba Air France
on State aid SA.33726 (11/C) [ex SA.33726 (11/NN)] — granted by Italy (deferral of payment of the milk levy in Italy)
o državni pomoči SA.33726 (11/C) [ex SA.33726 (11/NN)], ki jo je odobrila Italija (odlog plačila dajatev na mleko v Italiji)
(notified under document C(2013) 4046)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 4046)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to that Article, and having regard to those comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenim členom, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
After becoming aware of the entry into force, on 27 February 2011, of the law converting Decree-Law No 225 of 29 December 2010 into law, which granted a deferral of payment of an instalment of the milk levies payable by Italian milk producers under the scheme for payment by instalments approved by Council Decision 2003/530/EC of 16 July 2003 on the compatibility with the common market of an aid that the Italian Republic intends to grant to its milk producers [1], [2], the Commission asked the Italian authorities, by means of a letter dated 17 March 2011, for further information on the matter in question.
Ko je bila Komisija seznanjena, da bo 27. februarja 2011 začel veljati zakon, ki bo zakonski odlok št. 225 z dne 29. decembra 2010 preoblikoval v zakon, s katerim bo odobren odlog plačila obroka dajatev na mleko, ki ga morajo plačati italijanski proizvajalci mleka v okviru sheme obročnega plačevanja, odobrene v skladu z Odločbo Sveta št. 2003/530/ES z dne 16. julija 2003 o združljivosti pomoči, ki jo namerava Republika Italija dodeliti svojim proizvajalcem mleka, s skupnim trgom [1], [2], je z dopisom z dne 17. marca 2011 zaprosila italijanske organe za dodatne informacije v zvezi s tem.
The Italian authorities sent the Commission this additional information by letter dated 24 June 2011 and registered on 29 June 2011.
Italijanski organi so Komisiji te dodatne informacije poslali z dopisom z dne 24. junija 2011, evidentiranim 29. junija 2011.
After examining the information provided by the Italian authorities and taking into account the fact that the deferral of payment in question had taken place without the Commission having been notified of it in advance, or having authorised it, the Commission informed the Italian authorities by fax dated 14 October 2011 that a file for non-notified aid had been opened, under reference number SA.33726 (2011/NN).
Po proučitvi informacij, ki so jih predložili italijanski organi, in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je bil zadevni odlog plačila sprejet, ne da bi bila Komisija o tem vnaprej obveščena in ne da bi to odobrila, je Komisija s telefaksom z dne 14. oktobra 2011 italijanske organe obvestila, da je bil pod referenčno številko SA.33726 (2011/NN) odprt primer nepriglašene pomoči.
By letter of 11 January 2012, the Commission informed Italy of its decision to initiate the procedure provided for under Article 108(2) of the Treaty as regards the aforementioned deferral and the programme for payment by instalments approved by Decision 2003/530/EC as amended by the addition of the deferral, which constitutes a new aid (SA.33726 (11/C)]), asking the Italian authorities to comment on the opening of the procedure within one month..
Z dopisom z dne 11. januarja 2012 je Komisija Italijo obvestila o svojem sklepu o začetku postopka iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe v zvezi z navedenim odlogom in programom obročnega plačevanja, odobrenim z Odločbo Sveta št. 2003/530/ES, kot je bila spremenjena z uvedbo odloga, ki pomeni novo pomoč (SA.33726 (11/C)]), pri čemer je italijanske organe pozvala, da v enem mesecu predložijo pripombe o začetku postopka.
The Commission asked interested parties to submit their comments on the aid in question.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, da predložijo svoje pripombe o zadevni pomoči.
The Commission received comments from interested parties which it forwarded to Italy, giving it the opportunity to respond.
Komisija je pripombe, ki so ji jih poslale zainteresirane strani, posredovala Italiji in ji omogočila, da se nanje odzove.
By e-mail dated 13 February 2012, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission a letter from the Italian authorities requesting a two-month extension for commenting on the opening of the procedure.
Z elektronskim sporočilom z dne 13. februarja 2012 je Stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji poslalo Komisiji dopis italijanskih organov, v katerem prosijo za dvomesečno podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb o začetku postopka.
That extension was granted in a message sent by fax dated 21 February 2012.
To podaljšanje roka je bilo odobreno s sporočilom, poslanim po telefaksu, z dne 21. februarja 2012.
By e-mails dated 26 April 2012 and 27 April 2012, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission the Italian authorities’ reply to the opening of the procedure under Article 108(2) of the Treaty.
Z elektronskima sporočiloma z dne 26. aprila 2012 in z dne 27. aprila 2012 je stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji poslalo Komisiji odgovor italijanskih organov v zvezi z začetkom postopka v skladu s členom 108(2) Pogodbe.
The Italian authorities did not comment on the interested parties' comments.
Italijanski organi niso predložili pripomb na pripombe zainteresiranih strani.
The Council’s decision
Odločba Sveta
Article 1 of Decision 2003/530/EC states that:
V členu 1 Odločbe 2003/530/ES je navedeno:
‘The aid the Italian Republic intends to grant to milk producers, by itself making payment to the Community of the amount due from them to the Community by virtue of the additional levy on milk and milk products for the period 1995/1996 to 2001/2002 and by allowing these producers to repay their debt by way of deferred payment over a number of years without interest, is exceptionally considered to be compatible with the common market on condition that:
„Pomoč, ki jo namerava Republika Italija dodeliti proizvajalcem mleka in v okviru katere Skupnost sama izplača njihov dolgovani znesek dodatne dajatve na mleko in mlečne proizvode za obdobje od 1995/1996 do 2001/2002, tem proizvajalcem pa omogoči, da dolg v obliki odloženega plačila odplačajo v več letih brez obresti, izjemoma velja za združljivo s skupnim trgom pod pogojem, da:
repayment shall be in full by yearly instalments of equal size,
je znesek povrnjen v celoti z enako velikimi letnimi obroki,
the repayment period shall not exceed 14 years, starting from 1 January 2004’.
obdobje odplačevanja, ki se začne 1. januarja 2004, ni daljše od 14 let.“
The law converting Decree-Law No 225 of 29 December 2010 into law (Law No 10 of 26 February 2011, hereinafter referred to as ‘Law No 10/2011’)
Zakon, ki zakonski odlok št. 225 z dne 29. decembra 2010 preoblikuje v zakon (zakon št. 10 z dne 26. februarja 2011, v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon št. 10/2011)
In their letter of 24 June 2011, the Italian authorities explained that the grant equivalent for this measure would be counted among the de minimis aid for Italy provided under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1535/2007 of 20 December 2007 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty [4] to de minimis aid in the sector of agricultural production [5].
V dopisu z dne 24. junija 2011 so italijanski organi pojasnili, da se bo ekvivalent subvencije za ta ukrep prištel k pomoči de minimis za Italijo v skladu z Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1535/2007 z dne 20. decembra 2007 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES [4] pri pomočeh de minimis v sektorju kmetijske proizvodnje [5].
GROUNDS FOR OPENING THE FORMAL PROCEDURE
RAZLOGI ZA ZAČETEK FORMALNEGA POSTOPKA
The Commission decided to initiate the proceedings provided for under Article 108(2) of the Treaty for the following reasons:
Komisija se je odločila za začetek postopkov iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe iz naslednjih razlogov:
the Italian authorities had expressed their intention to classify the grant equivalent for the deferral of payment in question under the ‘de minimis’ system provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1535/2007; however, not only were there legal questions surrounding the applicability of that Regulation, as the Italian authorities had failed to provide any information on whether the individual and national aid ceilings established by the Regulation would be complied with, but also the Regulation itself forbids the granting of de minimis aid which raises the State aid above the permitted maximum.
italijanski organi so izrazili namero, da bodo ekvivalent subvencije za zadevni odlog plačila razvrstili v sistem de minimis iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1535/2007; vendar ne le, da je bila uporaba te uredbe vprašljiva s pravnega vidika, saj italijanski organi niso predložili nobenih informacij v zvezi s tem, ali se bodo spoštovale zgornje meje individualne in državne pomoči, določene v Uredbi, ampak Uredba tudi prepoveduje odobritev pomoči de minimis, s katero državna pomoč preseže največji dovoljeni znesek.
Since the aid approved by the Council constituted the maximum aid amount that Italy could grant to its milk producers, adding the grant equivalent of the deferral of payment included in the de minimis scheme means exceeding of the maximum aid approved by the Council;
Ker je bil znesek pomoči, ki jo je odobril Svet, največji dovoljeni znesek pomoči, ki jo je Italija lahko dodelila svojim proizvajalcem mleka, se je z vključitvijo ekvivalenta subvencije za odlog plačila v okviru sheme de minimis presegla največja dovoljena pomoč, ki jo je odobril Svet;
it therefore follows that the Commission could not rule out the possibility of the deferral in question involving a component of aid (as it amounted to the equivalent of an interest-free loan, hereinafter referred to as the ‘related aid’), a situation which none of the information provided by the Italian authorities could justify in the light of the rules applicable to State aid in the agricultural sector (Community Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture and forestry sector 2007 to 2013) [6];the deferral amounts to a breach of Decision 2003/530/EC (on the basis that one of its conditions – i.e. instalments of equal size – is no longer complied with).
na podlagi tega Komisija torej ne more izključiti možnosti, da zadevni odlog vključuje komponento pomoči (saj je ustrezala ekvivalentu brezobrestnega posojila, v nadaljnjem besedilu: povezana pomoč), pri čemer nobene od informacij, ki so jih predložili italijanski organi, tega ne morejo utemeljiti ob upoštevanju pravil, ki se uporabljajo za državno pomoč v kmetijskem sektorju (Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči v kmetijskem in gozdarskem sektorju 2007–2013) [6];odlog pomeni kršitev Odločbe 2003/530/ES (na podlagi tega, da eden od pogojev iz Odločbe – tj. enako veliki obroki – ni več izpolnjen).
It therefore means that the whole system of staggered payments becomes a new aid scheme for those who have benefited from it (on the basis that it was not included under Decision 2003/530/EC), a situation which does not appear to be permitted under any provision of the guidelines referred to above.
To pomeni, da se celoten sistem obročnega plačevanja spremeni v novo shemo pomoči za tiste, ki so jo prejeli (pod pogojem, da ni bila vključena v Odločbi 2003/530/ES), pri čemer se zdi, da tega ne dovoljuje nobena od določb iz zgornjih smernic.
COMMENTS BY THE ITALIAN AUTHORITIES ON THE OPENING OF THE FORMAL PROCEEDINGS
PRIPOMBE ITALIJANSKIH ORGANOV O ZAČETKU FORMALNIH POSTOPKOV
In their letter sent by e-mail on 26 April 2012, the Italian authorities first reported on the application of the system of staggered payments of milk levies approved under Council Decision 2003/530/EC, explaining that there were 11271 beneficiaries under the scheme.
Italijanski organi so v dopisu, poslanem po elektronski pošti dne 26. aprila 2012, prvič poročali o uporabi sistema obročnega plačevanja dajatev na mleko, odobrenega v skladu z Odločbo 2003/530/ES, pri čemer so pojasnili, da je v okviru sheme 11271 upravičencev.
The Italian authorities then explained that, in order to calculate the grant equivalent of the aid received by beneficiaries of the deferral, account was taken of interest for the period between 1 January 2011 and the date of actual payment of the instalments which were the subject of the deferral, using the three-month Euribor rate as of 1 October 2010, plus 100 basis points (1,942 %).
Italijanski organi so nadalje pojasnili, da so se pri izračunu ekvivalenta subvencije za pomoč, ki so jo prejeli upravičenci do odloga, upoštevale obresti za obdobje med 1. januarjem 2011 in datumom dejanskega plačila obrokov, ki so bili predmet odloga, na podlagi trimesečne obrestne mere Euribor od 1. oktobra 2010, povečane za 100 baznih točk (1,942 %).
The results of that calculation indicated a grant equivalent of between EUR 0,08 and EUR 694,19 and also showed that 1187 of the 1291 beneficiaries of the deferral had benefited from aid of less than EUR 100,00. According to the authorities, these figures indicate that the deferral of payment under Law No 10/2011 did not compromise the smooth running of the programme for payment by instalment, which continues to be in compliance with the provisions of Decision 2003/530/EC, as evidenced by the fact that only 11,45 % of producers involved in the programme in question benefited from the deferral.
Na podlagi rezultatov tega izračuna se je ekvivalent subvencije gibal med 0,08 EUR in 694,19 EUR, 1187 od 1291 upravičencev do odloga pa je prejelo pomoč, manjšo od 100,00 EUR. Po navedbah organov ti podatki kažejo, da odlog plačila v skladu z zakonom št. 10/2011 ni ogrozil nemotenega delovanja programa obročnega plačevanja, ki je še vedno v skladu z določbami Odločbe 2003/530/ES, kar dokazuje dejstvo, da je odlog izkoristilo le 11,45 % proizvajalcev, vključenih v zadevni program.