natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If a Member State receives a complaint which it does not consider manifestly unfounded or obtains evidence that a ship that flies its flag does not conform to the requirements of the relevant parts of MLC 2006 or that there are serious deficiencies in its implementing measures, that Member State shall take the steps necessary to investigate the matter and ensure that action is taken to remedy any deficiencies found.
Če država članica prejme pritožbo, za katero ne šteje, da je očitno neutemeljena, ali pridobi dokaz, da ladja, ki pluje pod njeno zastavo, ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz ustreznih delov MKDSP 2006 ali da obstajajo resne pomanjkljivosti pri njenih izvedbenih ukrepih, sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za preiskavo zadeve, in zagotovi, da se sprejmejo ukrepi za odpravo vseh odkritih pomanjkljivosti.
Personnel dealing with or becoming aware of complaints shall treat as confidential the source of any grievance or complaint alleging a danger or deficiency in relation to seafarers’ living and working conditions or a violation of laws and regulations and shall give no intimation to the shipowner, the shipowner’s representative or the operator of the ship that an inspection was made as a consequence of such a grievance or complaint.
Osebje, ki obravnava pritožbe ali je seznanjeno z njimi, obravnava vire vseh pritožb, ki zatrjujejo nevarnost ali pomanjkljivost v zvezi z življenjskimi in delovnimi razmerami pomorščaka ali kršitev zakonov in drugih predpisov, kot zaupne ter lastniku ladje, zastopniku lastnika ladje ali ladijskemu prevozniku ne sporoči, da je bil inšpekcijski pregled opravljen zaradi takšne pritožbe.
The Commission shall, in the context of its reports to be established in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 2009/21/EC, include matters falling within the scope of this Directive.
Komisija v svojih poročilih, ki jih pripravlja v skladu s členom 9 Direktive 2009/21/ES, obravnava tudi zadeve, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive.
No later than 31 December 2018, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation and application of Regulation 5.3 of MLC 2006 regarding labour-supplying responsibilities.
Komisija najpozneje 31. decembra 2018 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju in uporabi predpisa 5.3 MKDSP 2006 o odgovornosti zagotavljanja delavcev.
If appropriate, the report may include proposals for measures to enhance living and working conditions in the maritime sector.
Poročilo lahko po potrebi vključuje predloge ukrepov za izboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer v pomorskem sektorju.
When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Države članice se ob sprejetju teh ukrepov sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
The methods for making such references shall be laid down by Member States.
Način sklicevanja določijo države članice.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main measures of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo besedila temeljnih ukrepov nacionalnega prava, ki jih sprejmejo na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva..
Position of the European Parliament of 8 October 2013 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 15 November 2013.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. oktobra 2013 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 15. novembra 2013.
Council Decision 2007/431/EC of 7 of June 2007 authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Community, the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, of the International Labour Organisation (OJ L 161, 22.6.2007, p. 63).
Odločba Sveta 2007/431/ES z dne 7. junija 2007 o pooblastitvi držav članic, da v interesu Evropske skupnosti ratificirajo Konvencijo Mednarodne organizacije dela o delovnih standardih v pomorstvu iz leta 2006 (UL L 161, 22.6.2007, str. 63).
Council Directive 2009/13/EC of 16 February 2009 implementing the Agreement concluded by the European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 and amending Directive 1999/63/EC (OJ L 124, 20.5.2009, p. 30).
Direktiva Sveta 2009/13/ES z dne 16. februarja 2009 o izvajanju Sporazuma, sklenjenega med Združenjem ladjarjev Evropske skupnosti (ECSA) in Evropsko federacijo delavcev v prometu (ETF) o Konvenciji o delovnih standardih v pomorstvu iz leta 2006, ter o spremembi Direktive 1999/63/ES (UL L 124, 20.5.2009, str. 30).
Directive 2009/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on compliance with flag State requirements (OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 132).
Direktiva 2009/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o skladnosti z zahtevami države zastave (UL L 131, 28.5.2009, str. 132).
Directive 2009/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 47).
Direktiva 2009/15/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav (UL L 131, 28.5.2009, str. 47).
‘The Commission considers that the title does not properly reflect the scope of the Directive.’
„Komisija meni, da naslov ne odraža ustrezno področja uporabe direktive.“
Member States should ensure the effective discharge of their obligations as flag States with respect to the implementation, by ships flying their flag, of the relevant parts of MLC 2006.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da kot države zastave učinkovito izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti, kar zadeva izvajanje ustreznih delov MKDSP 2006 s strani ladij, ki plujejo pod njihovo zastavo.
In establishing an effective system for monitoring mechanisms, including inspections, a Member State could, where appropriate, grant authorisation to public institutions, or to other organisations within the meaning of Regulation 5.1.2 of MLC 2006, under the conditions set out therein.
Pri uvajanju učinkovitega sistema nadzornih mehanizmov, vključno z inšpekcijskimi pregledi, bi lahko država članica po potrebi pooblastila javne ustanove ali druge organizacije v smislu predpisa 5.1.2 MKDSP 2006, pod pogoji, določeni v navedenem predpisu.
This Directive lays down rules to ensure that Member States effectively discharge their obligations as flag States with respect to the implementation of the relevant parts of MLC 2006.
Ta direktiva določa pravila, ki zagotavljajo, da države članice učinkovito izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti kot države zastave v zvezi z izvajanjem ustreznih delov MKDSP 2006.
This Directive is without prejudice to Directives 2009/13/EC and 2009/21/EC, and to any higher standards for living and working conditions for seafarers set out therein.
Ta direktiva ne posega v direktivi 2009/13/ES in 2009/21/ES ter v morebitne strožje standarde o življenjskih in delovnih razmerah pomorščakov, določenih v njih.
Member States shall ensure that personnel, including staff from institutions or other organisations (‘recognised organisations’ within the meaning of MLC 2006), authorised to carry out inspections in accordance with Article 3(3) and in charge of verifying the proper implementation of the relevant parts of MLC 2006, have the training, competence, terms of reference, full legal authority, status and independence necessary or desirable to enable them to carry out that verification and to ensure compliance with the relevant parts of MLC 2006.
Države članice zagotovijo, da je osebje, vključno z osebjem iz institucij ali drugih organizacij (priznanih organizacij v smislu MKDSP 2006), ki je pooblaščeno za izvajanje inšpekcijskih pregledov v skladu s členom 3(3) in odgovorno za preverjanje pravilnega izvajanja ustreznih delov MKDSP 2006, opravilo usposabljanje, je kompetentno, izpolnjuje formalne pogoje, ima vsa zakonska pooblastila, položaj in neodvisnost, ki so potrebni ali želeni, da lahko opravljajo takšno preverjanje in zagotovijo skladnost z ustreznimi deli MKDSP 2006.
In accordance with MLC 2006, inspectors shall be empowered to take steps, as appropriate, to prohibit a ship from leaving port until necessary actions are taken.
V skladu z MKDSP 2006 se inšpektorji pooblastijo, da po potrebi ukrepajo in ladji prepovedo, da bi zapustila pristanišče, dokler se ne sprejmejo potrebni ukrepi.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 March 2015.
Države članice do 31. marca 2015 sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2013/55/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’)
o spremembi Direktive 2005/36/ES o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij in Uredbe (EU) št. 1024/2012 o upravnem sodelovanju prek informacijskega sistema za notranji trg (uredba IMI)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 46, 53(1) and 62 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti členov 46, 53(1) in 62 Pogodbe,
Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications [3] consolidated a system of mutual recognition which was initially based on 15 Directives.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij [3] je združila sistem vzajemnega priznavanja, ki je prvotno temeljil na 15 direktivah.
It provides for automatic recognition for a limited number of professions based on harmonised minimum training requirements (sectoral professions), a general system for the recognition of evidence of training and automatic recognition of professional experience.
Določa avtomatično priznavanje omejenega števila poklicev na podlagi usklajenih minimalnih zahtev usposabljanja (sektorski poklici), splošni sistem priznavanja dokazil usposobljenosti in avtomatično priznavanje poklicnih izkušenj.
Directive 2005/36/EC also established a new system of free provision of services.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES je vzpostavila tudi nov sistem za prosto opravljanje storitev.
It should be recalled that third-country family members of Union citizens benefit from equal treatment in accordance with Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States [4].
Spomniti bi bilo treba, da družinski člani državljanov Unije, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav, že uživajo pravice enake obravnave v skladu z Direktivo 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic [4].
Third-country nationals may also benefit from equal treatment with regard to recognition of diplomas, certificates and other professional qualifications, in accordance with the relevant national procedures, under specific Union legal acts such as those on long-term residence, refugees, ‘blue card holders’ and scientific researchers.
Državljani tretjih držav imajo lahko v skladu z ustreznimi nacionalnimi postopki korist tudi od enake obravnave glede priznavanja diplom, spričeval in drugih poklicnih kvalifikacij, v skladu s posebnimi pravnimi akti Unije, kot so akti o rezidentih za daljši čas, beguncih, „imetnikih modrih kart“ in znanstvenih raziskovalcih.
In its Communication of 27 October 2010 entitled ‘Single Market Act, Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence, ‘Working together to create new growth’, the Commission identified the need to modernise Union law in this area. On 23 October 2011, the European Council in its conclusions supported such a modernisation and urged the European Parliament and the Council to reach a political agreement on the revision of Directive 2005/36/EC by the end of 2012. In its resolution of 15 November 2011 on the implementation of the Professional Qualifications Directive (2005/36/EC) [5], the European Parliament also invited the Commission to come forward with a proposal. The EU Citizenship report 2010 of 27 October 2010 entitled ‘Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights’ underlines the need to lighten the administrative burden linked to the recognition of professional qualifications.
Komisija je v sporočilu z dne 27. oktobra 2010 z naslovom „Akt za enotni trg, Dvanajst pobud za okrepitev rasti in zaupanja ‚Skupaj za novo rast‘“ opredelila potrebo po posodobitvi prava Unije na tem področju. Evropski svet je v svojih sklepih dne 23. oktobra 2011 podprl tako posodobitev in pozval Evropski parlament in Svet, da dosežeta politični dogovor o spremembah Direktive 2005/36/ES do konca leta 2012. Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 15. novembra 2011 o izvajanju direktive o poklicnih kvalifikacijah (2005/36/ES) [5] prav tako pozval Komisijo, naj predloži predlog. Poročilo o državljanstvu EU z dne 27. oktobra 2010 z naslovom „Odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU“ poudarja potrebo po manjšem upravnem bremenu, povezanim s priznavanjem poklicnih kvalifikacij.
Notaries who are appointed by an official act of government should be excluded from the scope of Directive 2005/36/EC in view of the specific and differing regimes applicable to them in individual Member States for accessing and pursuing the profession.
Notarji, imenovani z aktom vlade, bi morali biti izvzeti iz področja uporabe Direktive 2005/36/ES zaradi posebnih in različnih ureditev, ki se za njih v posameznih državah članicah uporabljajo za dostop do poklica in njegovo opravljanje.
For the purposes of strengthening the internal market and promoting the free movement of professionals while ensuring a more efficient and transparent recognition of professional qualifications, a European Professional Card would be of added value.
Da bi okrepili notranji trg in spodbudili prost pretok strokovnjakov ter obenem zagotovili bolj učinkovito in pregledno priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, bi uvedba evropske poklicne izkaznice predstavljala dodano vrednost.
In particular, that Card would be useful to facilitate temporary mobility and recognition under the automatic recognition system, as well as to promote a simplified recognition process under the general system.
Ta izkaznica bi bila uporabna zlasti zaradi pospeševanja začasne mobilnosti in priznavanja v okviru sistema avtomatičnega priznavanja, pa tudi zaradi spodbujanja poenostavljenega postopka priznavanja v okviru splošnega sistema.
The purpose of the European Professional Card is to simplify the recognition process and to introduce cost and operational efficiencies that will benefit professionals and competent authorities.
Namen evropske poklicne izkaznice je poenostaviti postopek priznavanja ter uveljaviti stroškovno in operativno učinkovitost, ki bo koristila strokovnjakom in pristojnim organom.
The introduction of a European Professional Card should take into account the views of the profession concerned and should be preceded by an assessment of its suitability for the profession concerned and its impact on Member States.
Uvedba evropske poklicne izkaznice bi morala upoštevati mnenja zadevnega poklica, predhodno pa bi bilo treba oceniti njeno primernost za zadevni poklic in njen vpliv na države članice.
That assessment should be conducted together with Member States, where necessary.
To oceno bi bilo treba po potrebi pripraviti skupaj z državami članicami.
The European Professional Card should be issued at the request of a professional and after submission of necessary documents and completion of related verification procedures by the competent authorities.
Evropska poklicna izkaznica bi morala biti izdana na zahtevo strokovnjaka in po tem, ko so predloženi potrebni dokumenti ter pristojni organi zaključijo s tem povezane postopke preverjanja.
Where the European Professional Card is issued for the purpose of establishment, it should constitute a recognition decision and be treated as any other recognition decision under Directive 2005/36/EC.
Kadar se evropska poklicna izkaznica izda za namen ustanovitve, bi morala predstavljati odločitev o priznanju in bi se morala obravnavati enako kot vsaka druga odločitev o priznavanju po Direktivi 2005/36/ES.
It should complement rather than replace any registration requirements associated with access to a particular profession.
Kartica bi morala dopolnjevati in ne nadomestiti zahtev za registracijo za dostop do določenega poklica.
There is no need to introduce a European Professional Card for the legal professions for which professional cards are already implemented under the system provided for in Council Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services [6] and Directive 98/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 to facilitate practice of the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member State other than that in which the qualification was obtained [7].
Evropske poklicne izkaznice ni treba uvesti za pravniške poklice, za katere so že uvedene poklicne izkaznice v skladu s ureditvijo iz Direktive Sveta 77/249/EGS z dne 22. marca 1977 o učinkovitem uresničevanju svobode opravljanja storitev odvetnikov [6] in Direktive 98/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 za olajšanje trajnega opravljanja poklica odvetnika v drugi državi članici kakor tisti, v kateri je bila kvalifikacija pridobljena [7].
The functioning of the European Professional Card should be supported by the Internal Market Information System (IMI) established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8].
Delovanje evropske poklicne izkaznice bi moralo biti podprto z informacijskim sistemom za notranji trg (IMI), vzpostavljenim z Uredbo (EU) št. 1024/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8].
The Card and IMI should enhance synergies and trust among competent authorities, while at the same time eliminating duplication of administrative work and recognition procedures for the competent authorities, and creating more transparency and certainty for professionals.
Izkaznica in IMI bi morala povečati sinergije in zaupanje med pristojnimi organi, obenem pa odpraviti podvajanje upravnega dela in postopkov priznavanja za pristojne organe ter izboljšati preglednost in varnost za strokovnjake.
The process for the application and issuing of the European Professional Card should be clearly structured and incorporate safeguards and the corresponding rights of appeal for the applicant.
Postopek uporabe in izdaje evropske poklicne izkaznice bi moral biti jasno strukturiran ter bi moral vsebovati zaščitne ukrepe in ustrezne pravice do pritožbe za prosilca.
Implementing acts should specify translation requirements and the methods of payment of any fees to be provided by an applicant so that the workflow in IMI is not disrupted or impaired and the processing of the application is not delayed.
Izvedbeni akti bi morali določiti zahteve glede prevoda in načine plačila morebitnih pristojbin, ki jih mora plačati prosilec, tako da delo v IMI ne bo prekinjeno ali moteno ter da pri obravnavi prošnje ne bo prišlo do zamud.
Setting the level of fees is a matter for Member States.
Določitev višine pristojbin je v pristojnosti držav članic.
Member States should however notify the Commission about the level of fees set.
Države članice pa bi morale Komisijo obvestiti o višini pristojbin, ki so jih določile.
The European Professional Card and the related workflow within IMI should ensure the integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the data stored and avoid unlawful and unauthorised access to information contained therein.
Evropska poklicna izkaznica in s tem povezan tok dela znotraj IMI bi morala zagotoviti celovitost, verodostojnost in zaupnost shranjenih podatkov ter preprečiti nezakonit in nedovoljen dostop do informacij, shranjenih v sistemu.
Directive 2005/36/EC applies only to professionals who want to pursue the same profession in another Member State.
Direktiva 2005/36/ES velja samo za strokovnjake, ki želijo v drugi državi članici opravljati isti poklic.
There are cases where, in the host Member State, the activities concerned are part of a profession with a larger scope of activities than in the home Member State.
V nekaterih primerih so v državi članici gostiteljici zadevne dejavnosti del poklica z večjim obsegom dejavnosti kot v državi članici izvora.
If the differences between the fields of activity are so large that a full programme of education and training would be required from the professional to compensate for shortcomings, and if the professional so requests, a host Member State should under these particular circumstances grant partial access.
Če so razlike med področji dejavnosti tako velike, da bi moral strokovnjak za nadomestitev vrzeli v znanju opraviti popoln program izobraževanja in usposabljanja, ter če strokovnjak to zahteva, bi morala država članica gostiteljica v teh posebnih okoliščinah odobriti delni dostop.
However, where there are overriding reasons of general interest, as defined by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its case-law relating to Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and which may continue to evolve, a Member State should be able to refuse partial access.
Če pa obstajajo prevladujoči razlogi javnega interesa, kakor jih določa Sodišče Evropske unije v svoji sodni praksi v zvezi s členoma 49 in 56 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), ki se bodo lahko še razvili, bi morala imeti država članica možnost, da delni dostop zavrne.
This may in particular be the case for health professions if they have public health or patient safety implications.
To lahko še zlasti velja za zdravstvene poklice, če vplivajo na javno zdravje ali varnost bolnikov.
Granting partial access should be without prejudice to the right of social partners to organise themselves.
Odobritev delnega dostopa ne bi smela posegati v pravico socialnih partnerjev, da se organizirajo.
In the interest of protecting local consumers in the host Member State, temporary and occasional provision of services in Member States should be subject to safeguards, in particular a requirement of a minimum of one year’s professional experience during the last 10 years preceding the provision of services, in cases where the profession is not regulated in the home Member State.
Zaradi varstva lokalnih potrošnikov v državi članici gostiteljici, bi morali biti za začasno in občasno opravljanje storitev v državah članicah vzpostavljeni zaščitni ukrepi, zlasti glede zahteve po vsaj enem letu poklicnih izkušenj v obdobju zadnjih desetih let pred opravljanjem storitev, kadar poklic v državi članici izvora ni reguliran.
In the case of seasonal activities, Member States should have the possibility to carry out controls in order to verify the temporary and occasional nature of the services provided on their territory.
V primeru sezonskih dejavnosti bi morale države članice imeti možnost izvajati nadzor za potrditev začasne in priložnostne narave storitev, ki se opravljajo na njihovem ozemlju.
To that end, the host Member State should be able to require, once a year, information about the services actually provided on its territory, in cases where such information has not been already communicated on a voluntary basis by the service provider.
Zato bi morala država članica gostiteljica imeti možnost, da enkrat letno zahteva informacije o storitvah, ki se dejansko opravljajo na njenem ozemlju, kadar ponudnik storitev teh informacij ni že posredoval prostovoljno.