natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meaning that such information is ensured to be contained in any QC under Sdi-[Sie] defined CA/QC (if nothing in QC, then meaning is NoSSCD)
pomeni, da je taka informacija zagotovo vsebovana v katerem koli QC v skladu z določenim CA/QC z navedbo Sdi-[Sie] (če v QC ni nič, je oznaka za to NoSSCD)
The present Trusted List common template technical specifications allow for the use of a combination of five main parts of information in the service entry:
Veljavne tehnične specifikacije za skupni model zanesljivega seznama omogočajo uporabo kombinacije petih glavnih delov informacij v vnosu storitve:
The ‘Service type identifier’ (‘Sti’), e.g. identifying a CA issuing QCs (‘CA/QC’),
identifikator vrste storitve („Service type identifier“ ali „Sti“), npr. opredeljuje CA, ki izdaja QC („CA/QC“),
The ‘Service name’ (‘Sn’),
ime storitve („Service name“ ali „Sn“),
The ‘Service digital identity’ (‘Sdi’) information identifying a listed service, e.g. the public key (as a minimum) of a CA issuing QCs,
informacija o digitalni identiteti storitve („Service digital identity“ ali „Sdi“) opredeljuje navedeno storitev, npr. javni ključ (najmanj) za CA, ki izdaja QC,
For CA/QC services, optional ‘Service information extension’ (‘Sie’) information that allows for the inclusion of a number of specific service-related items of information relating to revocation status of expired certificates, additional characteristics of QCs, takeover of CSP by another CSP and other additional service information.
za storitve CA/QC, izbirna razširitev informacij o storitvah („Service information extension“ ali „Sie“), ki omogoča vključitev številnih posebnih, s storitvijo povezanih, informacij v zvezi s preklicem statusa preteklih potrdil, dodatnih značilnosti kvalificiranega potrdila, prevzema enega overitelja nad drugim in drugih dodatnih informacij o storitvi.
For example, the additional characteristics of QCs are represented by a sequence of one or more tuples, each tuple providing:
Na primer, dodatne značilnosti kvalificiranega potrdila so predstavljene kot niz ene ali več terk, pri čemer vsaka terka zagotavlja:
Criteria to be used to further identify (filter) under the ‘Sdi’ identified certification service that precise set of qualified certificates for which additional information is required/provided with regard to the indication of the ‘qualified’ status, the SSCD support and/or issuance to a Legal Person, and
v skladu z opredeljeno storitvijo overjanja „Sdi“ merila za nadaljnjo opredelitev (filtriranje), za katero se zahtevajo/zagotovijo dodatne informacije v zvezi z navedbo „kvalificiranega“ statusa, podpore SSCD in/ali izdajo pravni osebi, ter
The associated information (‘qualifiers’) on whether this set of qualified certificates is to be considered as ‘qualified’, is supported by an SSCD or not or whether this associated information is part of the QC under a standardised machine-processable form, and/or information regarding the fact that such QCs are issued to Legal Persons (by default they are to be considered as issued only to Natural Persons),
povezane informacije („kvalifikatorji“) o tem, ali je ta niz kvalificiranih potrdil treba šteti za „kvalificiran“, so podprte s SSCD ali ne, oziroma ali so te povezane informacije del standardiziranega QC v obliki, primerni za strojno obdelavo, in/ali informacije v zvezi z dejstvom, da se takšna QC izdajo pravnim osebam (načeloma se šteje, da se izdajo samo fizičnim osebam),
The ‘current status’ information for this service entry providing information on:
informacije o „trenutnem statusu“ za ta vnos storitve, ki zagotavljajo informacije:
If it is ensured (guarantee provided by CSPQC and supervised/accredited by Supervisory Body (SB)/Accreditation Body (AB)) that, for a listed service identified by a ‘Sdi’, any QC supported by an SSCD does contain the ETSI defined QcCompliance statement, and does contain the QcSSCD statement and/or QCP+ Object Identifier (OID), then the use of an appropriate ‘Sdi’ is sufficient and the ‘Sie’ field can be used as an option and will not need to contain the SSCD support information.
Če je zagotovljeno (jamstvo, ki ga zagotovi CSPQC in nadzoruje/akreditira nadzorni organ (SB)/akreditacijski organ (AB)), da za navedeno storitev, opredeljeno s „Sdi“, vsako QC, podprto s SSCD, vsebuje s strani ETSI opredeljeno izjavo QcCompliance in izjavo QcSSCD in/ali identifikacijsko oznako (OID) QCP+, potem zadostuje uporaba ustreznega „Sdi“, polje „Sie“ pa se lahko uporabi kot možna izbira in ni nujno, da vsebuje informacije o podpori SSCD.
If it is ensured (guarantee provided by CSPQC and supervised/accredited by SB/AB) that, for a listed service identified by a ‘Sdi’, any QC not supported by an SSCD does contain the QcCompliance statement and/or the QCP OID, and does not contain the QcSSCD statement or QCP+ OID, then the use of an appropriate ‘Sdi’ is sufficient and the ‘Sie’ field can be used as an option and does not have to contain the SSCD support information (meaning it is not supported by an SSCD).
Če je zagotovljeno (jamstvo, ki ga zagotovi CSPQC in nadzoruje/akreditira SB/AB), da za navedeno storitev, opredeljeno s „Sdi“, vsako QC, ki ni podprto s SSCD, vsebuje izjavo QcCompliance in/ali QCP OID in ne vsebuje izjave QcSSCD ali QCP + OID, potem zadostuje uporaba ustreznega „Sdi“, polje „Sie“ pa se lahko uporabi kot možna izbira in ni nujno, da vsebuje informacije o podpori SSCD (kar pomeni, da ni podprto s SSCD).
If it is ensured (guarantee provided by CSPQC and supervised/accredited by SB/AB) that, for a listed service identified by a ‘Sdi’, any QC does contain the QcCompliance statement, and some of these QCs are meant to be supported by SSCDs and some not (e.g. this may be differentiated by different CSP specific Certificate Policy OIDs or through other CSP specific information in the QC, directly or indirectly, machine-processable or not), but a certificate that is supported by an SSCD contains NEITHER the QcSSCD statement NOR the ETSI QCP(+) OID, then the use of an appropriate ‘Sdi’ may not be sufficient AND the ‘Sie’ field must be used to indicate explicit SSCD support information together with a potential information extension to identify the covered set of certificates.
Če je zagotovljeno (jamstvo, ki ga zagotovi CSPQC in nadzoruje/akreditira SB/AB), da za navedeno storitev, opredeljeno s „Sdi“, vsako QC vsebuje izjavo QcCompliance in da se nekatera QC štejejo kot podprta s SSCD (npr. to se lahko razlikuje glede na različne OID politike potrdila, specifične za CSP, ali druge informacije, specifične za CSP, neposredno ali posredno, z možnostjo strojne obdelave ali ne), vendar NE VSEBUJE niti izjave QcSSCD niti ETSI QCP(+) OID, potem uporaba ustreznega „Sdi“ ne zadostuje IN se v polje „Sie“ vnesejo izrecne informacije o podpori SSCD, skupaj z morebitno razširitvijo informacij, da se opredeli zajeti niz potrdil.
If it is ensured (guarantee provided by CSPQC and supervised/accredited by SB/AB) that for a listed service identified by a ‘Sdi’, any QC does not contain any of the QcCompliance statement, the QCP OID, the QcSSCD statement, or the QCP+ OID but it is ensured that some of these end-entity certificates issued under this ‘Sdi’ are meant to be QCs and/or supported by SSCDs and some not (e.g. this may be differentiated by different CSPQC specific Certificate Policy OIDs or through other CSPQC specific information in the QC, directly or indirectly, machine-processable or not), then the use of an appropriate ‘Sdi’ will not be sufficient AND the ‘Sie’ field must be used to include explicit qualification information.
Če je zagotovljeno (jamstvo, ki ga zagotovi CSPQC in nadzoruje/akreditira SB/AB), da za navedeno storitev, opredeljeno s „Sdi“, QC ne vsebuje izjave QcCompliance, QCP OID, izjave QcSSCD ali QCP + OID, vendar je zagotovljeno, da se nekatera izmed teh potrdil končnih subjektov, izdana po tem „Sdi“, štejejo za QC in/ali kot podprta s SSCD (npr. to se lahko razlikuje glede na različne OID politike potrdila, specifične za CSPQC ali druge informacije v QC, specifične za CSPQC, neposredno ali posredno, z možnostjo strojne obdelave ali ne), potem uporaba ustreznega „Sdi“ ne zadostuje IN je treba uporabiti polje „Sie“ za vključitev izrecnih informacij o podpori SSCD.
As a general default principle, for a listed CSP in the Trusted List there must be one service entry per single public key for a CA/QC type certification service, i.e. per Certification Authority (directly) issuing QCs.
Načeloma mora za CSP, navedenega na zanesljivem seznamu, obstajati en vnos storitve za posamezen javni ključ za storitev overjanja CA/QC, tj. za overitelja potrdila (CA), ki (neposredno) izdaja QC.
In some exceptional circumstances and carefully managed conditions, the Member State’s Supervisory Body/Accreditation Body may decide to use, as the ‘Sdi’ of a single entry in the list of services from this listed CSP, the public key of a Root or Upper level CA within the CSP’s PKI (e.g. in the context of a CSP’s hierarchy of CAs from a Root CA down to several issuing CAs) instead of listing all sub-ordinate issuing CA services (i.e. listing a Certification Authority not directly issuing end-entity QCs but certifying a hierarchy of CAs down to CAs issuing QCs to end-entities).
V nekaterih izjemnih okoliščinah in skrbno nadzorovanih pogojih se lahko nadzorni organ/akreditacijski organ države članice odloči, da bo kot „Sdi“ posameznega vnosa na seznam storitev navedenega CSP uporabil javni ključ korenske ali višje ravni CA znotraj overiteljeve PKI (tj. v okviru overiteljeve hierarhije CA od korenskega CA do številnih CA, ki izdajajo QC), namesto da bi navedel vse podrejene CA (tj. overitelja potrdila, ki ne izdaja neposredno QC končnim subjektom, temveč potrjuje hierarhijo CA vse do CA, ki izdajajo QC končnim subjektom).
The consequences (advantages and disadvantages) of using such Root CA or Upper CA public key as ‘Sdi’ value in a Trusted List service entry must be carefully considered when implemented by Member States.
Posledice (prednosti in slabosti) uporabe takšnega javnega ključa korenskega CA ali višjega CA kot vrednosti „Sdi“ vnosov storitev na zanesljivi seznam morajo države članice pri izvajanju skrbno preučiti.
Moreover, when using this authorised exception to the default principle, the Member State must provide the necessary documentation to facilitate certification path building and verification.
Poleg tega morajo države članice pri uporabi te dovoljene izjeme od splošnega načela zagotoviti potrebno dokumentacijo za pospešitev vzpostavitve in potrditve verige overjanja.
As an example, in the context of a CSPQC using one Root CA under which several CAs are issuing QCs and non-QCs, but for which the QCs do contain only the QcCompliance statement and no indication of whether it is supported by an SSCD, listing the Root CA ‘Sdi’ only would mean, under the rules explained above, that none of the QC issued under this Root CA is supported by an SSCD.
Na primer, v okviru CSPQC, ki uporablja en korenski CA, po katerem več CA izdaja kvalificirana in nekvalificirana potrdila, vendar za katerega QC vsebujejo le izjavo QcCompliance in ne navajajo, ali so QC podprti s SSCD, bi po zgoraj pojasnjenih pravilih zgolj navedba „Sdi“ korenskega CA pomenila, da QC, izdan po tej korenski hierarhiji CA, ni podprt s SSCD.
If there are QCs that are actually supported by an SSCD but with no machine processable statement indicating such support included in the certificates, it would be strongly recommended to make use of the QcSSCD statement in the QCs issued in the future.
Če obstajajo QC, ki so dejansko podprti s SSCD, vendar nimajo izjave (v obliki, primerni za strojno obdelavo) o tem, ali je takšna podpora vključena v potrdila, je zelo priporočljivo, da se v QC, ki se izdajo v prihodnosti, uporabi izjava QcSSCD.
In the meantime (until the last QC not containing this information has expired), the Trusted List should make use of the ‘Sie’ field and associated ‘Qualifications Extension’, e.g. providing filtering information to identify set(s) of certificates through use of specific CSPQC defined OID(s) potentially used by the CSPQC to distinguish between different types of QCs (some supported by an SSCD and some not) and associating explicit ‘SSCD support information’ to those identified (filtered) set(s) of certificates through the use of ‘Qualifiers’.
Medtem (dokler ne poteče veljavnost zadnjega QC, ki ne vsebuje te informacije) pa je treba v zanesljivem seznamu uporabljati polje „Sie“ in povezane „razširitve kvalifikacij“, in sicer, da se zagotovi filtriranje informacij za opredelitev nizov potrdil s pomočjo posebnih OID, ki jih opredeli CSPQC in jih morebiti uporablja za razlikovanje med različnimi vrstami QC (nekateri so podprti s SSCD, drugi pa ne), in vključno z izrecnimi „informacijami o podpori SSCD“ v zvezi s temi filtriranimi nizi potrdil s pomočjo „kvalifikatorjev“.
The general usage guidelines for electronic signature applications, services or products relying on a Trusted List compliant with the present Technical Specifications are as follows:
Splošne smernice za uporabo aplikacij, storitev ali proizvodov za elektronsko podpisovanje, ki temeljijo na zanesljivem seznamu v skladu s temi tehničnimi specifikacijami, so naslednje:
A ‘CA/QC’‘Sti’ entry (similarly a CA/QC entry further qualified as being a ‘RootCA/QC’ through the use of ‘Sie’ additionalServiceInformation Extension)
Vnos „CA/QC“„Sti“ (podobno vnos CA/QC, ki je nadalje opredeljen kot „korenski CA/QC“ z uporabo „Sie“ razširitve additionalServiceInformation)
indicates that from the ‘Sdi’ identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the ‘Sdi’ identified RootCA), all issued end-entity certificates are QCs provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate machine processable QcStatement (i.e. QcCompliance) and/or ETSI defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is ensured by Supervisory/Accreditation Body, see above ‘general editing guidelines’)
pomeni, da so s strani „Sdi“ opredeljenega CA (podobno v hierarhiji CA, začenši s korenskim CA, opredeljenim s „Sdi“) vsa izdana potrdila končnim subjektom kvalificirana potrdila, pod pogojem, da je to navedeno v potrdilu z uporabo ustreznih izjav QcStatement v obliki, primerni za strojno obdelavo (tj. QcCompliance), in/ali s strani ETSI opredeljenih QCP(+) OID (in to zagotavlja nadzorni/akreditacijski organ, glej zgornje „splošne smernice za urejanje“).
Note: if no ‘Sie’‘Qualifications Extension’ information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not further identified through a related ‘Sie’‘Qualifications Extension’, then the machine-processable information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
Opomba: Če ni navedene informacije „Sie“„razširitev kvalifikacije“ ali če potrdilo končnega subjekta, ki naj bi bilo QC, ni nadalje opredeljeno s povezanim vnosom „Sie“„razširitev kvalifikacije“, se točnost informacij v QC v obliki, primerni za strojno obdelavo, nadzoruje/akreditira.
That means that the usage (or not) of the appropriate QcStatements (i.e. QcCompliance, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI defined QCP(+) OIDs is ensured to be in accordance with what it is claimed by the CSPQC.
To pomeni, da je uporaba (ali neuporaba) ustreznih izjav QcStatement (tj. QcCompliance, QcSSCD) in/ali s strani ETSI opredeljenih QCP(+) OID zagotovo v skladu s podatki, ki jih navaja CSPQC.
and IF‘Sie’‘Qualifications Extension’ information is present, then in addition to the above default usage interpretation rule, those certificates that are identified through the use of this ‘Sie’‘Qualifications Extension’ information, which is constructed on the principle of a sequence of filters further identifying a set of certificates, must be considered according to the associated qualifiers providing some additional information regarding the qualified status, the ‘SSCD support’ and/or ‘Legal person as subject’ (e.g. those certificates containing a specific OID in the Certificate Policy extension, and/or having a specific ‘Key usage’ pattern, and/or filtered through the use of a specific value to appear in one specific certificate field or extension, etc.).
in ČE je informacija ‚Sie‘‚razširitev kvalifikacije‘ navedena, je treba poleg zgornjega pravila za razlago upoštevati tista potrdila, ki so opredeljena s pomočjo te informacije ‚Sie‘‚razširitev kvalifikacije‘, ki je sestavljena po načelu niza filtrov, ki nadalje opredeljujejo sklop potrdil v skladu s povezanimi kvalifikatorji, ki zagotavljajo dodatne informacije o kvalificiranem statusu, ‚podpori SSCD‘ in/ali ‚pravni osebi kot subjektu‘ (npr. tista potrdila, ki vsebujejo posebno OID v razširitvi politike potrdila in/ali ki imajo poseben vzorec ‚uporabe ključa‘ in/ali so filtrirana s pomočjo posebne vrednosti, ki se pojavi v določenem polju ali razširitvi, itd.).
Those qualifiers are part of the following set of ‘Qualifiers’ used to compensate for the lack of information in the corresponding QC content, and that are used respectively:
Ti kvalifikatorji so del naslednjega niza ‚kvalifikatorjev‘, ki se uporabljajo za zapolnitev vrzeli v informacijah ustrezne vsebine QC, in se uporabljajo:
to indicate the qualified status: ‘QCStatement’ meaning the identified certificate(s) is(are) qualified,
za navedbo kvalificiranega statusa: ‚QCStatement‘ pomeni opredeljene certifikate, ki so kvalificirani,
AND/OR
IN/ALI
to indicate the nature of the SSCD support
za navedbo vrste podpore SSCD:
‘QCWithSSCD’ qualifier value meaning ‘QC supported by an SSCD’, or
vrednost kvalifikatorja ‚QCWithSSCD‘ pomeni ‚QC, podprt s SSCD‘ ali
‘QCNoSSCD’ qualifier value meaning ‘QC not supported by an SSCD’, or
vrednost kvalifikatorja ‚QCNoSSCD‘ pomeni ‚QC, ki ni podprt s SSCD‘ ali
‘QCSSCDStatusAsInCert’ qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the ‘Sdi’-‘Sie’ provided information in this CA/QC entry,
vrednost kvalifikatorja ‚QCSSCDStatusAsInCert‘ pomeni zagotovitev, da vsako kvalificirano potrdilo z informacijami o ‚Sdi‘-‚Sie‘ v tem vnosu CA/QC vsebuje informacije o podpori SSCD,
to indicate issuance to Legal Person:
za navedbo izdaje pravni osebi:
‘QCForLegalPerson’ qualifier value meaning ‘Certificate issued to a Legal Person’
vrednost kvalifikatorja „QCForLegalPerson“ pomeni „potrdilo, izdano pravni osebi“.
Certificate validity status services related to QCs and for which the certificate validity status information (e.g. CRLs and OCSP responses) is signed by an entity whose private key is not certified under a certification path leading to a listed CA issuing QCs (‘CA/QC’) shall be included in Trusted List by listing those certificate validity status services as such in the TL (i.e. with a service type ‘OCSP/QC’ or ‘CRL/QC’ respectively) since these services can be considered as part of the supervised/accredited ‘qualified’ services related to the provision of QC certification services.
Storitve v zvezi s statusom veljavnosti potrdil, ki so povezane s QC in za katere informacije o statusu veljavnosti potrdil (tj. odzivi CRL in OCSP) podpiše subjekt, katerega zasebni ključ ni overjen po verigi overjanja, ki vodi do navedenih CA, ki izdajajo QC („CA/QC“), se vključi v zanesljivi seznam tako, da se v zanesljivem seznamu navedejo storitve v zvezi s statusom veljavnosti potrdil kot take (tj. z indikatorjem vrste storitve „OCSP/QC“ oziroma „CRL/QC“), saj se šteje, da so te storitve lahko del nadzorovanih/akreditiranih „kvalificiranih“ storitev, povezanih z zagotavljanjem storitev overjanja QC.
Of course, OCSP responders or CRL Issuers whose certificates are signed by CAs under the hierarchy of a listed CA/QC service are to be considered as ‘valid’ and in accordance with the status value of the listed CA/QC service.
Seveda je treba odzivnike OCSP ali izdajatelje CRL, katerih potrdila podpišejo CA po hierarhiji navedene storitve CA/QC, obravnavati kot „veljavne“ in skladne z vrednostjo statusa navedene storitve CA/QC.
A similar provision can apply to certification services issuing non-qualified certificates (of a ‘CA/PKC’ service type).
Podobna določba se lahko uporabi za storitve overjanja za izdajanje nekvalificiranih potrdil (vrsta storitve „CA/PKC“).
The Trusted List shall include certificate validity status services when related location information for such services is not present in the end-entity certificates to which the certificate validity status services apply.
Zanesljivi seznam vključuje storitve v zvezi s statusom veljavnosti potrdil, kadar v potrdilih končnega subjekta, na katere se nanaša storitev v zvezi s statusom veljavnosti potrdil, ni zadevne informacije o lokaciji za takšno storitev.
As defined in Article 2(11) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljeno v členu 2(11) Direktive 1999/93/ES.
a certification service provider that creates and assigns public key certificates; or
Overitelj, ki ustvari in dodeli potrdila javnega ključa, ali
a technical certificate generation service that is used by a certification service provider that creates and assign public key certificates.
tehnična storitev ustvarjanja potrdil, ki jo uporablja overitelj, ki ustvari in dodeli potrdila javnega ključa.
NOTE: See clause 4 of EN 319 411-2 [11] for further explanation of the concept of certification authority.
OPOMBA: Glej klavzulo 4 EN 319 411-2 [11] za dodatno razlago koncepta overitelj potrdila.
As defined in Article 2(9) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljeno v členu 2(9) Direktive 1999/93/ES.
As defined in Article 2(10) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljeno v členu 2(10) Direktive 1999/93/ES.
As defined in Article 2(3) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljen v členu 2(3) Direktive 1999/93/ES.
Refers to supervision provided for in Article 3(3) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Nanaša se na nadzor, določen v členu 3(3) Direktive 1999/93/ES.
Directive 1999/93/EC requires Member States to establish an appropriate system allowing the supervision of CSPs which are established on their territory and issue qualified certificates to the public, ensuring the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in that Directive.
Direktiva 1999/93/ES od držav članic zahteva, da zagotovijo ustrezen sistem, ki omogoča nadzor overiteljev, ki imajo sedež na njihovem ozemlju in izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila javnosti, s katerim zagotavljajo nadzor skladnosti z določbami iz navedene direktive.
As defined in Article 2(13) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
Kot je opredeljena v členu 2(13) Direktive 1999/93/ES.
Designates the list indicating the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Services Providers who are supervised/accredited by the referenced Member State for compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC.
Označuje seznam, ki navaja status nadzora/akreditacije storitev overjanja s strani overiteljev (CSP), ki jih zadevna država članica nadzira/akreditira zaradi skladnosti z določbami iz Direktive 1999/93/ES.
Form of a signed list used as the basis for presentation of trust service status information according to the specifications laid down in the ETSI TS 119 612.
Oblika podpisanega seznama, ki se uporablja kot podlaga za predstavitev informacij o statusu varnih storitev v skladu s specifikacijami iz ETSI TS 119 612.
Service which enhances trust and confidence in electronic transactions (typically, but not necessarily, using cryptographic techniques or involving confidential material) (ETSI TS 119 612).
Storitev, ki poveča zaupanje v elektronske transakcije (običajno, vendar ne nujno, s pomočjo kriptografskih tehnik ali ki vključuje zaupno vsebino) (ETSI TS 119 612).
NOTE: This term is used with a broader application than certification service issuing certificates or providing other services related to electronic signatures.
OPOMBA: Ta pojem se uporablja v širšem smislu kot storitev overjanja, ki izdaja potrdila ali zagotavlja druge storitve v zvezi z elektronskimi podpisi.
Examples of binary TrSTs are certificates, Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs), Time Stamp Tokens (TSTs) and Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responses.
Primeri binarnih TrST so potrdila, seznami preklica potrdil (CRL), žetoni časovnega žiga (TST) in odzivi protokola za sprotno preverjanje statusa (OCSP).