natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On this latter point, TMK argued that it is totally irrelevant for customs classification purposes how the product is described by a purchaser.
V zvezi s slednjim je skupina TMK trdila, da je za carinske namene klasifikacije povsem nepomembno, kako kupec opiše izdelek.
In reply to this, it must be stated that the description of the product by the purchaser has some value in the sense that the purchaser is obviously aware of the product requirements at the time of order.
V odgovor na to je treba navesti, da je opis izdelka s strani kupca pomemben v smislu, da je kupec dejansko seznanjen z zahtevami izdelka v času naročila.
To say, therefore, that the purchaser's description is ‘totally irrelevant’ is doubtful.
Izjava, da je kupčev opis „povsem nepomemben“, je torej vprašljiva.
In conclusion, the semi-finished seamless steel tubes produced with heat treatment purchased for the purpose of producing such cylinders have to correspond to very detailed technical/quality/dimensional requirements.
Skratka, polizdelki brezšivnih jeklenih cevi, izdelani s toplotno obdelavo, kupljeni za proizvodnjo takih jeklenk, morajo ustrezati zelo podrobnim tehničnim/kakovostnim/dimenzijskim zahtevam.
These features are clearly not corresponding with the notion of ‘unworked’ as mentioned in the Explanatory Notes to CN 73043910 and 73045910 and therefore, the comments made by the TMK Group regarding the alleged wrong interpretation of the term ‘unworked’ by the Commission had to be rejected.
Te značilnosti vsekakor ne ustrezajo pojmu „neobdelan“, kot navajata pojasnjevalni opombi h KN 73043910 in 73045910, in zato je bilo treba pripombe, ki jih je dala skupina TMK v zvezi z domnevno napačno razlago pojma „neobdelan“ s strani Komisije, zavrniti.
Contrary to several previous statements, the TMK group also argued that these products sold to an unrelated customer were not solely destined for the same application i.e. the production of cylinders, but could also be transformed in so-called ‘precision pipes’.
V nasprotju z več predhodnimi izjavami je skupina TMK trdila tudi, da ti izdelki, ki so bili prodani nepovezani stranki, niso bili namenjeni izključno za isto uporabo, tj. proizvodnjo jeklenk, saj bi se lahko predelali v tako imenovane „precizne cevi“.
The group stated that the unrelated customer first transforms blanks into cold rolled pipes (or precision pipes) which are then processed into gas cylinders.
Skupina je navedla, da prva nepovezana stranka najprej preoblikuje neobdelane izdelke v hladno valjane cevi (ali precizne cevi), ki se nato predelajo v plinske jeklenke.
It should be noted that this element is not only contradictory to what was stated by the TMK group in previous submissions and to what was found in the documents collected during the verification visits.
Opozoriti je treba, da ta element ni le v nasprotju s tem, kar je navedla skupina TMK v prejšnjih stališčih, temveč tudi s tem, kar je bilo ugotovljeno iz dokumentov, zbranih med preveritvenimi obiski.
Notwithstanding the above, it should be noted that this additional allegation was new, was submitted at a late stage and was not substantiated by evidence.
Ne glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba opozoriti, da je bila ta dodatna trditev nova, da je bila predložena v pozni fazi in ni bila podprta z dokazi.
In addition, the group submitted evidence that allegedly showed that the unrelated customer also sold precision pipes.
Poleg tega je skupina predložila dokaze, ki naj bi kazali, da je nepovezana stranka prodajala tudi precizne cevi.
While noting that this evidence was submitted very late in the investigation, it was also noted that the evidence related to a period long after the end of the RIP and that the documents related to possible sales of any types (or sections) of cold rolled products (pipes).
Poleg tega, da je bil ta dokaz predložen zelo pozno v preiskavi, je bilo treba opozoriti tudi, da se je dokaz nanašal na obdobje dolgo po koncu OPP in da so se dokumenti nanašali na morebitno prodajo katere koli vrste (ali dela) hladno valjanih izdelkov (cevi).
The majority of exports of the product concerned by the exporting producers to the Union were made to independent customers in the Union through two related trading companies, i.e. TMK Europe GmbH located in Germany and TMK Italia s.r.l. located in Italy.
Večina izvoza zadevnega izdelka proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo je bila opravljena neodvisnim strankam v Uniji prek dveh povezanih trgovskih družb, tj. TMK Europe GmbH, s sedežem v Nemčiji, in TMK Italia s.r.l., s sedežem v Italiji.
The export price for the above-mentioned exports was established on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, i.e. using the resale prices actually paid or payable to the related company by the first independent buyer in the Union in the RIP, adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale and for profits.
Izvozna cena za zgoraj navedeni izvoz je bila določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali se plačujejo, tj. na podlagi dejansko plačanih ali plačevanih cen pri nadaljnji prodaji za povezano družbo prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Uniji v OPP, prilagojenih za vse stroške, ki so nastali med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, ter za dobiček.
Some limited quantities were exported directly to independent customers in the Union.
Omejene količine so bile izvožene neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
The export price for these quantities was established on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozna cena za te količine je bila določena na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, adjustments were made in respect of packaging, transport costs, credit costs and anti-dumping duties.
Na tej podlagi so bile opravljene prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški pakiranja, prevoza in kredita ter protidampinškimi dajatvami.
The TMK Group requested that certain characteristics pertaining to steel grade, threading type and coating of SPT be taken into account in order to ensure a fair comparison between SPT sold domestically and for export.
Skupina TMK je zahtevala, da se upoštevajo nekatere značilnosti, ki se nanašajo na vrsto jekla, navoja in premaza zadevnega izdelka, da bi bila zagotovljena poštena primerjava med zadevnimi izdelki, prodanimi na domačem trgu in za izvoz.
The Defence Committee of the Seamless Steel Tube Industry of the European Union (‘ESTA’) claimed that any request to change the product definition or the methodology used in the original investigation or subsequent review was in breach of Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation and should be disregarded.
Zaščitni odbor industrije brezšivnih jeklenih cevi Evropske unije („ESTA“) je trdil, da je kakršna koli zahteva za spremembo opredelitve izdelka ali metodologije, uporabljene v prvotni preiskavi ali poznejšem pregledu, v nasprotju s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe in se je ne bi smelo upoštevati.
In this regard, the investigation revealed that the request made by the TMK Group did not affect the product definition but rather allowed the identification of additional characteristics which ensure a fair comparison of SPT sharing the same features.
V zvezi s tem je preiskava pokazala, da zahteva, ki jo je vložila skupina TMK, ni vplivala na opredelitev izdelka, temveč je omogočila identifikacijo dodatnih značilnosti, ki zagotavljajo pošteno primerjavo zadevnih izdelkov z enakimi značilnostmi.
Further, it was found that these additional characteristics affected prices and price comparability.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so te dodatne značilnosti vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen.
On the basis of the above, it was considered that the request was warranted and the above mentioned characteristics were therefore taken into account.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da je zahtevek utemeljen, in zgoraj navedene lastnosti so bile zato upoštevane.
The TMK Group claimed that, in accordance with Article 11(10) of the basic Regulation, the duties paid on DDP (‘delivered duty paid’) transactions should not be deducted in order to construct export price.
Skupina TMK je trdila, da v skladu s členom 11(10) osnovne uredbe pri konstruiranju izvozne cene dajatve, plačane na transakcije DDP („dobavljeno ocarinjeno“), ne bi smele biti odštete.
It claims that, in comparison with the last full 12-month period prior to the imposition of anti-dumping duties on TMK's exports of SPT to the Union (1 July 2005-30 June 2006 or ‘reference period’), the duty was duly reflected in the prices charged in the RIP and the subsequent selling prices in the Union.
Trdi, da se je v primerjavi z zadnjim celotnim 12-mesečnim obdobjem pred uvedbo protidampinških dajatev na izvoz zadevnega izdelka skupine TMK v Unijo (1. julija 2005–30. junija 2006 ali „referenčno obdobje“) dajatev ustrezno odražala v cenah, zaračunanih v OPP, in nadaljnjih prodajnih cenah v Uniji.
In this regard, it was found that the DDP prices charged to the first unrelated customers did not cover costs let alone the anti-dumping duties; i.e. these transactions were overall loss making.
V tem smislu je bilo ugotovljeno, da cene DDP, zaračunane prvim nepovezanim strankam, niso krile stroškov, kaj šele protidampinških dajatev; te transakcije so na splošno delale izgubo.
It is further noted that, even though prices for similar products increased by ca. 30 % since the reference period, the price of raw materials which account on average for more than 50 % of the cost of manufacturing increased by more than 70 % over the same period.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da čeprav so se cene za podobne izdelke od referenčnega obdobja povečale za približno 30 %, so se cene surovin, ki v povprečju predstavljajo več kot 50 % stroškov proizvodnje, v istem obdobju povečale za več kot 70 %.
On the basis of the above, it is considered that no conclusive evidence was provided to show that the duty is duly reflected in the prices charged.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se šteje, da prepričljivi dokazi, ki bi kazali, da se dajatev ustrezno odraža v zaračunanih cenah, niso bili predloženi.
It is also noted that, even if one were to accept that the duty is reflected in the subsequent selling prices (quod non), Article 11(10) of the basic Regulation requires that resale prices and subsequent selling prices both reflect the duty.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da tudi če bi se strinjali, da se dajatev odraža v cenah nadaljnje prodaje (quod non), pa člen 11(10) osnovne uredbe zahteva, da cene pri nadaljnji prodaji in nadaljnje prodajne cene odražajo to dajatev.
After disclosure, the TMK Group continued to object to the deduction of the duties from the export prices and further argued that the gas cost adjustment made resulted in losses, which in its view, were certainly of a lower magnitude, without providing however any further evidence.
Po razkritju je skupina TMK še naprej nasprotovala odbitku dajatev od izvozne cene in je nadalje trdila, da je prilagoditev za stroške plina privedla do izgub, ki pa so bile po njihovem mnenju nedvomno nižje, vendar ni predložila nobenih dodatnih dokazov.
The TMK Group maintained its view that the fact that ex-works export prices should be above the costs of production was legally flawed and reiterated that the criteria to be examined was only whether anti-dumping duties paid were duly reflected in the resale price charged by its unrelated customers which purchased on a DDP basis.
Skupina TMK je vztrajala pri stališču, da je dejstvo, da naj bi izvozne cene na ravni franko tovarna presegale stroške proizvodnje, nezakonito, ter ponovno poudarila, da je treba preučiti le, ali se plačane protidampinške dajatve ustrezno odražajo v ceni nadaljnje prodaje, ki jo zaračunavajo njihove nepovezane stranke, ki so kupovale na podlagi DDP.
However, since the DDP prices charged to the first unrelated customers did not cover the costs, let alone the anti-dumping duties, even without the gas adjustment and since the price of raw materials which account on average for more than 50 % of the cost of manufacturing increased by more than 70 % over the same period as mentioned in recital (42) above, it is considered that the TMK Group has not provided conclusive evidence showing that the duty was duly reflected in the prices charged or subsequent selling prices.
Ker pa cene DDP, zaračunane prvim nepovezanim strankam, tudi brez prilagoditve stroškov za plin niso krile stroškov, kaj šele protidampinške dajatve, in ker so cene surovin v istem obdobju, ki v povprečju predstavljajo več kot 50 % stroškov proizvodnje, narasle za več kot 70 %, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 42, se šteje, da skupina TMK ni predložila prepričljivih dokazov, da se dajatev ustrezno odraža v zaračunanih cenah ali v cenah nadaljnje prodaje.
On the basis of the above, this claim had to be rejected.
Na podlagi navedenega je bilo treba to trditev zavrniti.
Pursuant to Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price per product type on an ex-work basis separately for each of the exporting producers.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe se je ločeno za vsakega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno na podlagi franko tovarna.
One common dumping margin is established for the TMK Group by calculating a single weighted average rate of dumping for the exporting producers within the TMK Group.
Skupna stopnja dampinga za skupino TMK se določi z izračunom enotne tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga za proizvajalce izvoznike skupine TMK.
On this basis the dumping margin, expressed as an percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, was 29,6 %.
Na podlagi tega je bila stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, 29,6 %.
Following disclosure, the TMK group pointed to some clerical errors in the dumping calculations for two of its production entities.
Po razkritju je skupina TMK opozorila na nekaj očitnih napak v izračunih dampinga pri dveh izmed svojih proizvodnih subjektov.
These clerical errors were corrected and the weighted average dumping margin found for the TMK Group is 28,7 % instead of 29,6 %.
Te napake so bile popravljene in povprečna tehtana stopnja dampinga, ki je bila ugotovljena za skupino TMK, je 28,7 % namesto 29,6 %.
It is noted that this dumping margin is, contrary to the prima facie evidence provided in the review request, higher than the existing duty applicable to imports from the TMK Group.
Opozoriti je treba, da je ta stopnja dampinga, v nasprotju z dokazi prima facie, predloženimi v zahtevku za pregled, višja od veljavne dajatve, ki se uporablja za uvoz od skupine TMK.
The increase results from a number of factors: firstly, the evidence provided in the review request only related to certain transactions of one of the three exporting producers.
Povečanje izhaja iz številnih dejavnikov: prvič, dokazi, predloženi v zahtevku za pregled, so zadevali le nekatere transakcije enega od treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Some of these transactions were found not to relate to the product concerned.
Nekatere od teh transakcij niso bile povezane z zadevnim izdelkom.
Secondly, during the course of the investigation, as mentioned in recital (23) above, some export transactions of the product concerned had not been reported by the group.
Drugič, med preiskavo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 23, nekatere izvozne transakcije zadevnega izdelka skupine niso bile navedene.
Finally, the group's claim in regard to duty as a cost (see recitals (41) to (45)) was rejected.
Nazadnje, trditve skupine v zvezi z dajatvami kot stroškom (glej uvodne izjave 41 do 45) so bile zavrnjene.
The combination of these elements, together with other elements verified during the course of the investigation, resulted in an increase in the dumping margin.
Kombinacija teh in drugih elementov, preverjenih med preiskavo, je povzročila povečanje stopnje dampinga.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the changed circumstances regarding dumping could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno tudi, ali se spremenjene okoliščine v zvezi z dampingom lahko upravičeno štejejo za trajne.
TMK Group indicated in its review request that there were changed circumstances of a lasting nature as it had made significant changes in its internal structure and substantial improvements to its production equipment which had a direct impact on its cost structure.
Skupina TMK je v svojem zahtevku za pregled navedla, da so spremenjene okoliščine trajne narave, saj je izvedla znatne spremembe v notranji strukturi in precejšnje izboljšave proizvodne opreme, ki so imele neposreden vpliv na stroškovno strukturo.
The investigation revealed that the TMK Group had indeed made significant investments that lead to efficiency gains and increased capacity.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so znatne naložbe skupine TMK vodile k večji učinkovitosti in povečanju zmogljivosti.
However, given the increase in raw material prices and the evolution of the product mix towards more added-value products, a decrease of production cost could not be ascertained.
Vendar, ob upoštevanju zvišanja cen surovin in razvoja proizvodnega programa v smeri izdelkov z visoko dodano vrednostjo, zmanjšanja proizvodnih stroškov ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti.
The improvements referred to in recital (50) were found to be of structural nature and to be unlikely to change in the near future.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so izboljšave, navedene v uvodni izjavi 50, strukturne narave in se v bližnji prihodnosti verjetno ne bodo spremenile.
In addition, the development of export prices to non-EU countries in the RIP and to the EU after the RIP was also considered.
Poleg tega je bil upoštevan tudi razvoj izvoznih cen za države, ki niso članice EU, v OPP in države EU po OPP.
It was found that exports to non-EU countries of identical products were made at comparable price levels as the export sales to the EU in the same period.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bil izvoz enakih izdelkov v države, ki niso članice EU, izveden na primerljivi ravni cen kot izvoz v EU v istem obdobju.
As far as the period after the RIP is concerned, it was found they were made at slightly higher prices than in the RIP, which is in line with international price level evolution.
Kar zadeva obdobje po OPP, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je prodaja potekala po nekoliko višjih cenah kot v OPP, kar je v skladu z razvojem cen na mednarodni ravni.
There was thus no indication that the export prices would fluctuate considerably in the foreseeable future.
Nobenih znakov torej ni bilo, da bi izvozne cene v bližnji prihodnosti precej nihale.
In the light of the results of the investigation, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from the TMK Group to 28,7 %.
Glede na rezultate preiskave se zdi primerno spremeniti protidampinško dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka skupine TMK, na 28,7 %.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend an amendment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2012 and were given an opportunity to comment,
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti sprememba Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 585/2012, in dana jim je bila možnost, da izrazijo pripombe –
The entry concerning OAO Volzhsky Pipe Plant, OAO Taganrog Metallurgical Works,
Vpis za OAO Volzhsky Pipe Plant,
OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant and OAO Seversky Tube Works in the table of Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2012 is hereby replaced by the following:
OAO Taganrog Metallurgical Works, OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant in OAO Seversky Tube Works v tabeli člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 585/2012 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant and OAO Seversky Tube Works
OAO Sinarsky Pipe Plant in OAO Seversky Tube Works
OJ C 303, 14.10.2011, p. 11.
UL C 303, 14.10.2011, str. 11.
The CEV is determined in accordance with Technical Report, 1967, IIW doc. IX-555-67, published by the International Institute of Welding (IIW).
CEV se določi v skladu s Tehničnim poročilom, 1967, IIW dok. IX-555-67, ki ga je objavil Mednarodni inštitut za varilstvo (IIW).
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the applicant and at its related trading companies ZAO TMK Trade House (Moscow), TMK Warehouse Complex LLC (Lytkaryno), TMK Europe GmbH (Cologne), TMK Italia s.r.l.
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih vložnika in z njim povezanih trgovskih družbah ZAO TMK Trade House (Moskva), TMK Warehouse Complex LLC (Lytkaryno), TMK Europe GmbH (Köln), TMK Italia s.r.l.
(Lecco) and TMK Global S.A. (Geneva).
(Lecco) in TMK Global S.A. (Ženeva).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1270/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1270/2012
derogating from Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards the deadline for reviewing the decision on specific support for 2012 in Portugal, from Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 as regards the deadline for notification of such a review and as regards the conditions applicable to specific agricultural activities entailing additional agri-environment benefits and from Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 as regards the information contained in the aid application
o odstopanju od Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 glede roka za revizijo odločitve o posebni podpori za leto 2012 na Portugalskem, od Uredbe (ES) št. 1120/2009 glede roka za obveščanje o takšni reviziji in glede pogojev, ki veljajo za posebne kmetijske dejavnosti, ki prinašajo dodatne koristi za kmetijstvo in okolje, ter od Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 glede informacij, vsebovanih v zahtevkih za pomoč
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [1], and in particular Article 142 (c), (l) and (r) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 [1], zlasti člena 142(c), (l) in (r) Uredbe,
Portugal wishes to increase the level of support foreseen in the framework of the dairy specific support measure currently implemented under Article 68(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 in order to help farmers concerned to face this situation in the short term.
Portugalska želi povečati raven podpore, predvidene v okviru posebnega podpornega ukrepa za sektor mleka in mlečnih izdelkov, ki se trenutno izvaja na podlagi člena 68(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, da bi zadevnim kmetom, ki se soočajo s temi razmerami, kratkoročno pomagala.
Accordingly, Portugal has requested to be authorised to revise its decision on the implementation of specific support for 2012 in view of introducing support under Article 68(1)(a)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 in substitution to support currently implemented under Article 68(1)(a)(i) of that Regulation.
Zato je zaprosila, da se ji dovoli revidiranje njene odločitve o izvajanju posebne podpore za leto 2012, da bi uvedla podporo na podlagi člena 68(1)(a)(v) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 namesto podpore, ki se trenutno izvaja na podlagi člena 68(1)(a)(i) navedene uredbe.
Portugal intends to use the resulting available amounts for increasing the level of support to dairy farmers within the measure implemented under Article 68(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009.
Portugalska namerava razpoložljive zneske, ki bi tako nastali, uporabiti za povečanje ravni podpore pridelovalcem mleka v okviru ukrepa, ki se izvaja na podlagi člena 68(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.