natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 77(5) of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 foresees that, for investment measures, Articles 26, 27 and 28 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1975/2006 [6] should apply mutatis mutandis.
Člen 77(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 določa, da se za naložbene ukrepe smiselno uporabljajo členi 26, 27 in 28 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1975/2006 [6].
However, in the light of Article 19(1) and Articles 76 to 80 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008, the reference to some of those rules, which are now set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 [7], should be deleted in order to improve clarity.
Vendar bi bilo treba glede na člen 19(1) in člene 76 do 80 Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 sklicevanje na nekatere od navedenih pravil, ki so zdaj določena z Uredbo (EU) št. 65/2011 [7], zaradi večje jasnosti črtati.
Article 81(3) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 foresees rules on controls related to the production potential and to the operations of restructuring and conversion of vineyards, for areas receiving a grubbing-up premium in accordance with Articles 85o to 85x of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Člen 81(3) in (5) Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 določa pravila o nadzoru v zvezi z obsegom vinogradniških površin ter ukrepi prestrukturiranja in preusmeritve vinogradov za območja, ki prejemajo premijo za izkrčitev v skladu s členi 85o do 85x Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007.
However, Article 81(4) foresees an on-the-spot control or a remote sensing control in case of grubbing-up, if its resolution is equal to or higher than 1 m2 or the grubbing-up covers the entire vineyard parcel.
Vendar člen 81(4) določa uporabo pregleda na kraju samem ali nadzora z daljinskim zaznavanjem v primeru izkrčitve, če je njegova ločljivost enaka ali višja od 1 m2 oziroma če izkrčitev zajema celotno vinogradniško parcelo.
Grubbing-up before replanting can also be an operation carried out in the framework of a restructuring and conversion measure and therefore it is appropriate to foresee the same rule for this measure.
Izkrčitev pred ponovno zasaditvijo je lahko tudi ukrep, ki se izvaja v okviru ukrepa prestrukturiranja in preusmeritve, zato je primerno, da se za ta ukrep določi enako pravilo.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001 [8] provided the simplified VI-1 document for wine products, including grape juice originating in a list of countries, including the United States of America, and imported into the Union.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 883/2001 [8] je določila poenostavljen dokument V I 1 za proizvode iz grozdja in vina, vključno z grozdnim sokom, s poreklom v različnih državah, vključno z Združenimi državami Amerike, ki se uvažajo v Unijo.
Since the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on trade in wine [9], wine from the United States of America can be imported into the Union accompanied by a certification document as provided for in Article 9 of the Agreement.
Od začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Združenimi državami Amerike o trgovini z vinom [9] se vino iz Združenih držav Amerike lahko uvaža v Unijo, če ga spremlja potrdilo, kot je določeno v členu 9 Sporazuma.
In consequence, in Regulation (EC) No 555/2008, which replaced Regulation (EC) No 883/2001, the United States of America were not included in the list of countries allowed to use the simplified VI-1 document.
Posledično v Uredbi (ES) št. 555/2008, ki je nadomestila Uredbo (ES) št. 883/2001, Združene države Amerike niso bile vključene na seznam držav, ki lahko uporabljajo poenostavljeni dokument V I 1.
However, as grape juice is not covered by that Agreement, the United States of America should be added to that list for the benefit of wine products not covered by the scope of the Agreement.
Ker pa navedeni sporazum ne zajema grozdnega soka, bi se morale Združene države Amerike dodati na navedeni seznam v korist proizvodov iz grozdja in vina, ki niso zajeti v področju uporabe Sporazuma.
in the first paragraph, point (d) is replaced by the following:
v prvem odstavku se točka (d) nadomesti z naslednjim:
for each programming period, the support for the promotion and information lasts no longer than three years for a given beneficiary in a given third-country;
če se nekemu upravičencu v neki tretji državi zagotavlja pomoč za promocijo in informiranje največ tri leta za posamezno programsko obdobje;
however, if necessary, it may be renewed once, for a period no longer than two years;’;
ta pa se po potrebi lahko enkrat obnovi za obdobje, ki ni daljše od dveh let;“;
the third paragraph is deleted;
tretji odstavek se črta.
Having examined the applications, Member States shall select those offering the best value for money.
Države članice po pregledu vlog izberejo ekonomsko najugodnejše.
Preference shall be given to:
Prednost se da:
micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the meaning of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC;
mikro, malim in srednje velikim podjetjem v smislu Priporočila Komisije 2003/361/ES;
beneficiaries targeting a new third country for which they have not received support in the past within this scheme.
upravičencem, ki načrtujejo dejavnosti v novi tretji državi, za katero v preteklosti niso prejeli podpore v okviru te sheme
Member States shall draw up a list within the limit of available funds and shall communicate that list to the Commission using the form set out in Annex VIII in order to allow the other Member States to be informed and to increase coherence of the measure.
Države članice sestavijo seznam na podlagi razpoložljivih sredstev ter ga pošljejo Komisiji na obrazcu iz Priloge VIII, da se lahko obvestijo druge države članice in se poveča skladnost ukrepa.
Ineligible operations
Neupravičeni ukrepi
For the purposes of the second subparagraph of Article 103q(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, “the normal renewal of vineyards which have come to the end of their natural life” shall mean the replanting of the same parcel of land with the same variety according to the same system of vine cultivation.
Za namene drugega pododstavka člena 103q(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 ‚običajna obnova vinogradov, ki se jim je iztekla naravna življenjska doba‘ pomeni vnovično zasaditev istega zemljišča z isto sorto po istem sistemu gojenja vinske trte.
The following operations are not eligible:
Naslednji ukrepi niso upravičeni:
day-to-day management of a vineyard;
vsakodnevno upravljanje vinograda,
protection against damage by game, birds or hail;
zaščita pred škodo, ki jo povzročijo divjad, ptice ali toča,
construction of windbreaks and wind protection walls;
izgradnja protivetrnih pasov in zidov za zaščito pred vetrom,
driveways and elevators.’;
dovozne poti in dvigala.“
Subject to the provisions of Article 103q of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and of this Chapter, Member States shall lay down rules setting out the eligible restructuring and conversion actions and their respective eligible costs.
Ob upoštevanju določb člena 103q Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 in tega poglavja države članice sprejmejo predpise o upravičenih ukrepih prestrukturiranja in preusmeritve ter njihovih upravičenih stroških.
The rules may provide in particular either for the payment of flat-rate amounts, or for maximum levels of support per hectare.
V teh predpisih se lahko zlasti določijo plačilo pavšalnih zneskov ali najvišja dovoljena višina pomoči na hektar.
In addition, the rules may provide for the adjustment of the support on the basis of objective criteria.
Poleg tega se lahko v predpisih določi prilagoditev pomoči na podlagi nepristranskih meril.
In order to avoid overcompensation, where Member States make use of flat rate amounts, these shall be established on the basis of an accurate calculation of the actual costs of each type of operation.
Da bi se izognili prekomerni kompenzaciji, se, kadar države članice uporabljajo pavšalne zneske, ti določijo na podlagi natančnega izračuna dejanskih stroškov posamezne vrste ukrepa.
Flat rate amounts may be adapted annually if justified.
Če je upravičeno, se pavšalni zneski lahko vsako leto prilagodijo.
The support is paid for the area planted, defined in conformity with Article 75(1).’;
Pomoč se izplača za zasajeno površino, ki se določi v skladu s členom 75(1).“
Article 10 is deleted;
Člen 10 se črta.
Articles 26 to 34 are deleted;
Členi 26 do 34 se črtajo.
in Article 35, paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:
V členu 35 se odstavek 6 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States deciding to transfer, for 2014 and from 2015 onwards, the entire amount of their national envelope for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, shall not be required to submit the forms set out in Annexes V to VIIIc to this Regulation.’;
Državam članicam, ki se odločijo, da bodo za leto 2014 in od leta 2015 dalje prenesle celoten znesek svojih nacionalnih sredstev za podporne programe, da bi povečale svoje nacionalne zgornje meje za neposredna plačila iz člena 40 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, ni treba predložiti obrazcev iz prilog od V do VIIIc k tej uredbi.“
in Article 43(2), the introductory phrase of the second subparagraph is replaced by:
V členu 43(2) se uvodni stavek drugega pododstavka nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘In the case of wine put up in labelled containers of a capacity not exceeding 60 litres, fitted with non-reusable closing devices, and provided that the wine originates in a country appearing in Annex XII, part A, which has offered special guarantees accepted by the Community, the analysis report section of the V I 1 form need be completed only in respect of:’;
„Če je vino polnjeno v označene posode, ki držijo največ 60 litrov in imajo zapirala za enkratno uporabo, in če vino izvira iz države iz dela A Priloge XII, ki je ponudila posebna jamstva, ki jih je sprejela Skupnost, je treba v oddelku za analizni izvid obrazca V I 1 izpolniti samo naslednje podatke:“.
V I 1 documents made out by wine producers in the third countries listed in Annex XII, Part B, which have offered special guarantees accepted by the Community shall be considered as certificates or analysis reports drawn up by agencies and laboratories included in the list provided for in Article 48 provided that the producers have received individual approval from the competent authorities of those third countries and are subject to inspection by the latter.’;
Dokumenti V I 1, ki jih sestavijo proizvajalci vina v tretjih državah iz dela B Priloge XII, ki so ponudile posebna jamstva, ki jih je sprejela Skupnost, se štejejo za potrdila ali analizne izvide, ki jih sestavijo agencije in laboratoriji, vključeni na seznam v skladu s členom 48, če so proizvajalci prejeli posamično odobritev pristojnih organov v zadevnih tretjih državah, ki jih slednje pregledujejo.“;
in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, point (a) is replaced by the following:
v prvem pododstavku odstavka 2 se točka (a) nadomesti z naslednjim:
in box 1, their names and addresses and their registration numbers in the third countries listed in Annex XII, Part B;’;
v okence 1 svoje ime in naslov ter matično številko v tretjih državah iz dela B Priloge XII;“.
Articles 67 to 73 are deleted;
Členi 67 do 73 se črtajo.
in Article 77, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:
V členu 77 se odstavek 5 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Concerning measures foreseen by Article 103u of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, Article 24(1) to (3) and (6), and Article 26(1) and (2) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
V zvezi z ukrepi iz člena 103u Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 se smiselno uporabljajo člen 24(1) do (3) in (6) ter člen 26(1) in (2) Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 65/2011.
Article 81 is amended as follows:
Člen 81 se spremeni:
paragraphs 3 and 5 are deleted;
odstavka 3 in 5 se črtata;
The control that the grubbing-up, including as an operation of restructuring and conversion of vineyard, has actually taken place, shall be carried out by an on-the-spot check.
Ali je bila izkrčitev, tudi kot ukrep prestrukturiranja in preusmeritve vinograda, dejansko opravljena, se preveri s pregledom na kraju samem.
In the case of grubbing-up of the entire vineyard parcel or if the resolution of the remote sensing is equal to or higher than 1 m2, the control may be carried out by remote sensing.’;
Pri izkrčitvi celotne vinogradniške parcele, ali če je ločljivost daljinskega zaznavanja enaka ali višja kot 1 m2, se preverjanje lahko opravi z daljinskim zaznavanjem.“
Annexes II, III, IV, XII, and XIII are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation;
Priloge II, III, IV, XII, in XIII se spremenijo v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Annexes XIV and XV are deleted.
Prilogi XIV in XV se črtata.
Annexes II, III, IV, XII and XIII are amended as follows:
Priloge II, III, IV, XII in XIII se spremenijo:
in Annex II, point B is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi II se točka B nadomesti z naslednjim:
Financial years 2014-2018 [1]
Proračunska leta 2014–2018 [1]
Date of communication [3]:
Datum sporočila [3]:
in Annex III, point B is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi III se točka B nadomesti z naslednjim:
Financial years 2014-2018 [4]
Proračunska leta 2014–2018 [4]
in Annex IV point B is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi IV se točka B nadomesti z naslednjim:
Financial years 2014-2018
Proračunska leta 2014–2018
Date of communication [7]:
Datum sporočila [7]
Reason:
Obrazložitev:
modification requested by the Commission/modification requested by the Member State [8]
spremembo zahtevala Komisija/spremembo zahtevala država članica [8]
List of third countries referred to in Article 43(2) and Article 45
Seznam tretjih držav iz člena 43(2) in člena 45
United States of America’;
Združene države Amerike“
Tables 2, 4, 5, 6, and 10 to 13 of Annex XIII are deleted.
Razpredelnice 2, 4, 5, 6 in 10 do 13 Priloge XIII se črtajo.
The amounts also include the expenses of actions launched in the framework of the first five-year programme 2009-2013 and for which payments will be done in the second five-year programme 2014-2018.
Zneski vključujejo tudi stroške ukrepov v okviru prvega petletnega programa 2009–2013 in njihova izplačila v drugem petletnem programu 2014–2018.
OP acronym to be used.
Uporablja se kratica Urada za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti (OP).
by 1 March 2013 at the latest for measures 2 to 8.’
najpozneje do 1. marca 2013 za ukrepe od 2 do 8.“
OP acronym to be used.’
Uporablja se kratica Urada za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti (OP).“
1 March and 30 June.
1. marec in 30. junij.
Articles 67 to 73 establish rules for the grubbing-up scheme which ended in 2011.
V členih 67 do 73 so določena pravila za program krčenja, ki se je zaključil v letu 2011.
The grubbing-up scheme ended in 2011.
Program krčenja se je zaključil v letu 2011.
Therefore, those rules should be deleted.
Zato bi bilo treba navedena pravila črtati.
new beneficiaries who did not receive support in the past; and
novim upravičencem, ki v preteklosti niso prejeli podpore, in
Member States deciding to reduce, from the 2015 financial year onwards, the amount available for the support programmes in order to increase their national ceilings for direct payments referred to in Article 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, shall notify these amounts before 1 August 2013.
Države članice, ki se odločijo, da bodo od proračunskega leta 2015 dalje znižale znesek, ki je na voljo za podporne programe, da bi povečale svoje nacionalne zgornje meje za neposredna plačila iz člena 40 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009, te zneske sporočijo pred 1. avgustom 2013.
The data submitted in the forms provided in Annexes I, II, III, VII and VIII shall be adapted accordingly if that decrease had not been already foreseen in the draft support programme presented by 1 March 2013.
Podatki, ki se predložijo na obrazcih iz prilog I, II, III, VII in VIII, se ustrezno prilagodijo, če navedeno znižanje ni bilo že predvideno v osnutku podpornega programa, predloženem do 1. marca 2013.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 203/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 203/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 204/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 204/2013
fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 4 to 5 March 2013 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of March 2013
o določitvi koeficienta dodelitve, ki se bo uporabil za zahtevke za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj za oljčno olje, vložene od 4. do 5. marca 2013 v okviru tunizijske tarifne kvote, in o začasni ukinitvi izdaje uvoznih dovoljenj za mesec marec 2013
The quantities for which import licence applications were lodged for 4 and 5 March 2013 under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 15,761228 %.
Za zahtevke za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj, vložene od 4. do 5. marca 2013 v skladu s členom 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1918/2006, se določi koeficient dodelitve 15,761228 %.
The issue of import licences in respect of amounts applied for as from 11 March 2013 shall be suspended for March 2013.
Izdaja uvoznih dovoljenj za količine, zahtevane od 11. marca 2013, se za marec 2013 začasno ukine.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 March 2013.
Ta uredba začne veljati 9. marca 2013.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 205/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 205/2013
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2/2012 on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain stainless steel fasteners consigned from the Philippines, whether declared as originating in the Philippines or not and terminating the investigation concerning possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by that regulation by imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof consigned from Malaysia and Thailand, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and Thailand or not
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 2/2012 o uvozu nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla, poslanega s Filipinov, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom s Filipinov ali ne, ter ustavitvi preiskave v zvezi z morebitnim izogibanjem protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z navedeno uredbo, z uvozom nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov, poslanim iz Malezije in Tajske, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajske ali ne
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2/2012 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 24,7 % on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’) for all other companies than the ones mentioned in Article 1(2) of that Regulation, following the expiry review of the measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005 [3] (‘the original Regulation’).
Svet je po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1890/2005 [2] („prvotna uredba“), z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 2/2012 [3] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 24,7 % na uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) za vse druge družbe, razen tistih iz člena 1(2) navedene uredbe.
These measures will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the measures in force’ or ‘original measures’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Ti ukrepi so v nadaljnjem besedilu „veljavni ukrepi“ ali „prvotni ukrepi“, preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih s prvotno uredbo, pa je v nadaljnjem besedilu „prvotna preiskava“.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) has decided, to investigate on its own initiative the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in the PRC and to make imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof consigned from Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines or not, subject to registration.
Ko je Evropska komisija („Komisija“) po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi prima facie za začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, je sklenila, da na lastno pobudo razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz LRK, in da za uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov, poslanih iz Malezije, Tajske in s Filipinov, uvede registracijo, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Malezije, Tajske in s Filipinov ali ne.
The investigation was initiated on 15 June 2012 by Commission Regulation (EU) No 502/2012 [4] (‘the initiating Regulation’).
Preiskava se je začela 15. junija 2012 z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 502/2012 [4] („uredba o začetku preiskave“).
The prima facie evidence at the Commission’s disposal was that following the imposition of the measures established in the original investigation a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines to the Union occurred, for which there was no sufficient due cause or justification other than the imposition of the measures established in the original investigation.
Dokazi prima facie, ki jih je imela na voljo Komisija, so navajali, da se je po uvedbi ukrepov iz prvotne preiskave znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki zajema izvoz iz LRK, Malezije, Tajske in Filipinov v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe ukrepov iz prvotne preiskave ni zadostnega vzroka ali utemeljitve.
This change stemmed allegedly from the transhipment of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in the PRC via Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines to the Union.
Ta sprememba je domnevno posledica pretovarjanja nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz LRK prek Malezije, Tajske in Filipinov v Unijo.
Furthermore, the evidence pointed to the fact that the remedial effects of the measures in force were being undermined both in terms of quantity and price.
Poleg tega so dokazi pokazali, da so bili popravljalni učinki veljavnih ukrepov oslabljeni v smislu količine in cene.
The evidence showed that these increased imports from Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines were made at prices below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation, adjusted for the increase in the costs of the raw material.
Iz dokazov je razvidno, da so bile cene tega povečanega uvoza iz Malezije, Tajske in s Filipinov nižje od neškodljivih cen iz prvotne preiskave, prilagojenih za povečanje stroškov surovin.
Finally, there was evidence that the prices of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof consigned from Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines were dumped in relation to the normal value previously established during the original investigation, adjusted for the increase in the costs of the raw material.
Nazadnje so dokazi pokazali, da so bile cene nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov, poslanih iz Malezije, Tajske in s Filipinov, dampinške v povezavi z normalno vrednostjo iz prvotne preiskave, prilagojeno za povečanje stroškov surovin.