natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The anti-dumping and countervailing duties are applicable to imports of products produced by the applicant and sales of the applicant to the Union are covered by the undertaking.
Protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve se uporabljajo za uvoz izdelkov, ki jih proizvaja vložnik, prodajo vložnika v Unijo pa ureja zaveza.
The applicant provided prima facie evidence that the continued application of the current duty at its current level was no longer necessary to offset dumping.
Vložnik je predložil dokaze prima facie, da nadaljnja uporaba sedanje dajatve na sedanji ravni za preprečevanje dampinga ni več potrebna.
In particular, the applicant claimed that there had been significant changes in the production costs of the company and that these changes have led to a substantially lower dumping margin since the imposition of the current duties.
Vložnik je zlasti trdil, da je prišlo do bistvenih sprememb v proizvodnih stroških družbe in da so te spremembe od uvedbe sedanjih dajatev privedle do znatno nižje stopnje dampinga.
A comparison made by the applicant of its domestic prices and its export prices to the Union suggested that the dumping margin was substantially lower than the level of current duties.
Vložnikova primerjava domačih cen in izvoznih cen v Unijo kaže, da je bila stopnja dampinga bistveno nižja od stopnje sedanjih dajatev.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that the request contained sufficient prima facie evidence to justify the initiation of the partial interim review, the Commission announced on 2 April 2011, by Notice 2011/C 102/09 [14], the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation limited to the examination of dumping as far as the applicant is concerned (‘the Notice of initiation’).
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da zahtevek vsebuje zadostne dokaze prima facie, ki upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, zato je 2. aprila 2011 z Obvestilom 2011/C 102/09 [14] napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, omejen na preiskavo dampinga v zvezi z vložnikom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku).
Parallel partial interim review of the countervailing measures
Vzporedni delni vmesni pregled izravnalnih ukrepov
On 2 April 2011, by Notice 2011/C 102/08 [15], the Commission announced the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of the basic AS Regulation, limited in scope to subsidisation and to the applicant.
Komisija je 2. aprila 2011 z Obvestilom 2011/C 102/08 [15] napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 19 osnovne protidampinške uredbe, po obsegu omejenega na subvencioniranje in na vložnika.
In the partial interim review of the countervailing measures it was found that the changes are not of a lasting nature.
V okviru delnega vmesnega pregleda izravnalnih ukrepov je bilo ugotovljeno, da spremembe niso trajne narave.
All interested parties were informed of the possibility to request a hearing.
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o možnosti zahtevati zaslišanje.
One hearing was requested and granted.
Zahtevano in odobreno je bilo eno zaslišanje.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent a questionnaire to the applicant and received a reply within the deadline set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku poslala vprašalnik, da bi pridobila informacije, ki so po njenem mnenju potrebne za njeno preiskavo, ta pa je izpolnjen vprašalnik vrnil v za to določenem roku.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the applicant in Kolkata, India and in Haldia, India.
Komisija je preveritveni obisk opravila v prostorih vložnika v Kalkuti v Indiji in v Haldiji v Indiji.
By letter to the Commission dated 18 April 2012, the applicant formally withdrew its request for the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of PET originating in India.
Vložnik je s pismom Komisiji z dne 18. aprila 2012 uradno umaknil svoj zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz PET s poreklom iz Indije.
The withdrawal is supported mainly with the further expansion of the applicant’s production capacity which demonstrates that the changes in respect of dumping are not of a lasting nature due to an imminent further decrease in production costs.
Umik je utemeljen predvsem z nadaljnjo širitvijo vložnikove proizvodnje zmogljivosti, ki kaže, da spremembe v zvezi z dampingom zaradi neposrednega nadaljnjega zmanjšanja proizvodnih stroškov niso trajne narave.
The applicant claimed that it is the continuous process of change which calls into question the lasting nature of the changes established during the investigation.
Vložnik je trdil, da nenehni postopek spreminjanja postavlja pod vprašaj trajno naravo sprememb, ugotovljenih med preiskavo.
It was established that, although some of the changes established during the investigation were of a lasting nature, the company is indeed in a continuous process of change.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je družba, kljub temu da so bile nekatere spremembe, ugotovljene med preiskavo, trajne narave, resnično v nenehnem postopku spreminjanja.
In view of the withdrawal, it was considered whether it would be warranted to continue the review investigation ex officio.
Glede na umik zahtevka je bilo preučeno, ali bi bilo preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom upravičeno nadaljevati po uradni dolžnosti.
The Commission services found no compelling reasons that termination would not be in the Union interest.
Službe Komisije niso našle utemeljenih razlogov, da zaključek ne bi bil v interesu Unije.
On this basis, the review investigation should be terminated.
Na podlagi tega bi bilo treba preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom zaključiti.
Interested parties were informed of the intention to terminate the review investigation and were given the opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o načrtovanem zaključku preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ter imele možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
It is therefore concluded that the review concerning imports of PET originating in India should be terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force,
Zato se sklene, da bi bilo treba pregled v zvezi z uvozom PET s poreklom iz Indije zaključiti brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov –
The partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in India initiated pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 is hereby terminated without amending the anti-dumping measures in force.
Delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz določenega polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Indije, začet v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009, se zaključi brez spremembe veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
OJ L 226, 11.10.2005, p. 62.
UL L 226, 11.10.2005, str. 62.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 561/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 561/2012
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 284/2012 imposing special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 284/2012 o uvedbi posebnih pogojev za uvoz krme in živil, ki izvirajo iz Japonske ali so od tam poslani, po nesreči v jedrski elektrarni Fukušima
That Regulation was replaced by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2011 [3] which was later replaced by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 284/2012 [4].
Navedena uredba je bila nadomeščena z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 961/2011 [3], ki jo je pozneje nadomestila Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 284/2012 [4].
The Japanese authorities have recently reported frequent non-compliance of log-grown shiitake originating in the prefecture of Iwate.
Japonski organi so pred kratkim poročali, da gobe šitake, vzgojene na lubju in s poreklom iz prefekture Ivate, pogosto niso bile v skladu z zahtevami.
In addition, non compliance was reported on a few samples of fern and fish originating in Iwate.
Poleg tega je bila sporočena neskladnost na nekaterih vzorcih praproti in rib iz prefekture Ivate.
The prefecture of Iwate is not among the prefectures of the affected zone, where a testing of all feed and food originating from those prefectures is required before export to the Union.
Prefektura Ivate ne spada med prefekture prizadetega območja, za katere se zahteva preskušanje vse krme in živil s poreklom iz navedenih prefektur pred izvozom v EU.
Given these recent findings it is appropriate to add Iwate prefecture to the affected zone.
Zaradi teh nedavnih odkritij je primerno dodati prefekturo Ivate med prefekture prizadetega območja.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 284/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 284/2012 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 284/2012 is amended as follows:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 284/2012 se spremeni:
In Article 5, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
Člen 5(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
the products originate in and are consigned from a prefecture other than Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa, Shizuoka and Iwate; or
proizvodi izvirajo in so poslani iz prefekture, ki ni prefektura Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava, Šizuoka in Ivate, ali
the products are consigned from Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa, Shizuoka and Iwate prefectures, but do not originate in one of those prefectures and have not been exposed to radioactivity during transiting; or
so proizvodi poslani iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava, Šizuoka in Ivate, vendar ne izvirajo iz katere od navedenih prefektur in med prevozom niso bili izpostavljeni radioaktivnosti, ali
where the products originate in Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa, Shizuoka and Iwate prefectures, the products are accompanied by an analytical report containing the results of sampling and analysis."
proizvode spremlja poročilo o analizi, ki vsebuje rezultate vzorčenja in analize, če proizvodi izvirajo iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava, Šizuoka in Ivate.“
By way of derogation from Article 6(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 284/2012, products referred to in Article 1 of that Regulation may be imported into the Union if they are accompanied by a declaration according to the previous model of declaration set out in Annex I to that Regulation where:
Z odstopanjem od člena 6(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 284/2012 se proizvodi iz člena 1 navedene uredbe lahko uvozijo v Unijo, če jih spremlja izjava v skladu s prejšnjim vzorcem izjave, določenim v Prilogi I k navedeni uredbi, in:
the declaration was issued before the date of entry into force of this Regulation and the products have left Japan not more than 10 working days after the entry into force of this Regulation.
je bila izjava izdana pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe ter so proizvodi zapustili Japonsko najpozneje v 10 delovnih dneh po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
OJ L 92, 30.3.2012, p. 16.
UL L 92, 30.3.2012, str. 16.
(authorised representative referred to in Article 6(2) and(3))
(pooblaščeni predstavnik iz člena 6(2) in (3))
going to … (place and country of destination)
in namenjeni v … (namembni kraj in država)
which comes from the establishment …
ter prihajajo iz obrata …
(name and address of establishment)
(ime in naslov obrata),
is compliant with the legislation in force in Japan as regards the maximum levels for the sum of caesium-134 and caesium-137.
v skladu z določbami veljavne japonske zakonodaje glede mejnih vrednosti za vsoto cezija-134 in cezija-137;
not falling under the transitional measures provided in the Japanese legislation (see Annex III to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 284/2012) as regards the maximum level for the sum of caesium-134 and caesium-137
za katere se ne uporabljajo prehodni ukrepi, določeni v japonski zakonodaji, (glej Prilogo III Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 284/2012) glede mejnih vrednosti za vsoto cezija-134 in cezija-137;
falling under the transitional measures provided in the Japanese legislation (see Annex III to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 284/2012) as regards the maximum level for the sum of caesium-134 and caesium-137
za katere se uporabljajo prehodni ukrepi, določeni v japonski zakonodaji, (glej Prilogo III Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 284/2012) glede mejnih vrednosti za vsoto cezija-134 in cezija-137;
is originating in and consigned from a prefecture other than Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa, Shizuoka and Iwate.
izvirajo in so poslani iz prefekture, ki ni prefektura Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava, Šizuoka in Ivate.
is consigned from the prefectures Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa, Shizuoka and Iwate, but not originating in one of these prefectures and has not been exposed to radioactivity during transiting.
so poslani iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava, Šizuoka in Ivate, vendar ne izvirajo iz katere od navedenih prefektur in niso bili izpostavljeni radioaktivnosti med prevozom.
is originating in the prefectures Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa, Shizuoka and Iwate and has been sampled on … (date), subjected to laboratory analysis on … (date) in the … (name of laboratory), to determine the level of the radionuclides, caesium-134 and caesium-137.
izvirajo iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava, Šizuoka in Ivate, vzorci pa so bili odvzeti … (datum), in laboratorijska analiza opravljena … (datum) v … (ime laboratorija), za določitev vrednosti radionuklidov cezija-134 in cezija-137.
Stamp and signature of authorised representative referred to in Article 6(2) and (3)
Žig in podpis pooblaščenega predstavnika iz člena 6(2) in (3)
The levels of the sum of caesium-134 and caesium-137 found in log-grown shiitake were exceeding the stricter maximum level of 100 Becquerel/kg, in application in Japan since 1 April 2012.
Vrednosti vsote cezija-134 in cezija-137 v gobah šitake, vzgojenih na lubju, so presegale strožjo mejno vrednost 100 Becquerel/kg, ki se uporablja na Japonskem od 1. aprila 2012.
Also in a significant number of samples, the levels found were higher than the maximum level applicable before 1 April 2012 (500 Becquerel/kg).
V številnih vzorcih so bile ugotovljene tudi višje vrednosti od mejne vrednosti, ki se je uporabljala do 1. aprila 2012 (500 Becquerel/kg).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 562/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 562/2012
amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 234/2011 with regard to specific data required for risk assessment of food enzymes
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 234/2011 v zvezi s posebnimi podatki, potrebnimi za oceno tveganja živilskih encimov
Pursuant to Article 5(2) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 234/2011 of 10 March 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing a common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings [2], the application dossier shall include all the available data relevant for the purpose of the risk assessment.
V skladu s členom 5(2) Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 234/2011 z dne 10. marca 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1331/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi skupnega postopka odobritve za aditive za živila, encime za živila in arome za živila [2] dokumentacija zahtevka vključuje vse razpoložljive podatke, pomembne za oceno tveganja.
Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) No 234/2011 concerning specific data required for risk assessment of food enzymes, information shall be provided on the biological and toxicological data.
V skladu s členom 8(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 234/2011 v zvezi s posebnimi podatki, potrebnimi za oceno tveganja živilskih encimov, se navedejo informacije o bioloških in toksikoloških podatkih.
A number of food enzymes currently placed on the Union market have been evaluated and authorised under national provisions in France and Denmark in accordance with the guidelines for the presentation of data on food enzymes of the Scientific Committee on Food ("the SCF") set out in opinion expressed on 11 April 1991 (published in 1992) [3].
Številni živilski encimi, ki so trenutno na trgu Unije, so bili v skladu s smernicami za pripravo podatkov o živilskih encimih Znanstvenega odbora za prehrano (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SCF) [3], predstavljenimi v mnenju z dne 11. aprila 1991 (objavljeno 1992), ocenjeni in odobreni v skladu z nacionalnimi določbami v Franciji in na Danskem.
A few food enzymes (e.g. chymosin, invertase and urease) have also been evaluated by the SCF [4].
Nekatere živilske encime (npr. himozin, invertazo in ureazo) je prav tako ocenil SCF [4].
With regard to the toxicological properties of enzyme preparations, the SCF guidelines indicated that food enzymes which are derived from edible parts of (non genetically modified) plants and animals are generally considered as posing no health problems.
Glede toksikoloških lastnosti pripravkov z encimi je bilo v smernicah SCF navedeno, da živilski encimi, pridobljeni iz užitnih delov (gensko nespremenjenih) rastlin in živali na splošno ne povzročajo zdravstvenih težav.
According to the guidelines no special documentation for safety needs to be supplied provided that the potential consumption under normal use does not lead to an intake of any components which is larger than can be expected from normal consumption of the source as such, and provided that satisfactory chemical and microbiological specifications can be established.
V skladu s smernicami ni treba priložiti nobene posebne dokumentacije o varnostnih vprašanjih, če verjetna poraba pri normalni uporabi ne povzroči vnosa katere koli sestavine, ki je večji od pričakovanega vnosa pri normalni porabi vira kot takega in če se lahko zadovoljivo opredelijo kemijske in mikrobiološke značilnosti.
The European Food Safety Authority ("the Authority") has also indicated in its guidance on data requirements for the evaluation of food enzyme applications [5] that the justification for not supplying toxicological data for food enzymes from edible parts of animals and non genetically modified plants may include a documented history on the safety of the source of the food enzymes, the composition and the properties of the food enzyme as well as its use in food which demonstrates no adverse effects on human health when consumed in a comparable way, supported by any existing toxicological studies.
(5) Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) je v svojih smernicah o zahtevah za podatke za oceno zahtevkov za živilske encime [5] navedla, da lahko utemeljitev, zakaj niso priloženi toksikološki podatki za živilske encime iz užitnih delov živali in gensko nespremenjenih rastlin, vključuje dokumentirano zgodovino, podprto z vsemi obstoječimi toksikološkimi študijami, o varnosti vira živilskih encimov, sestavi in lastnostih živilskega encima ter njegovi uporabi v živilih, ki dokazuje, da encim pri primerljivi porabi ne povzroča nobenih škodljivih učinkov na zdravje ljudi.
Therefore, the enzyme application for food enzymes from such edible sources should not be required to include toxicological data.
Zato se ne sme zahtevati, da zahtevki za živilske encime iz takih užitnih virov vključujejo toksikološke podatke.
The concept of Qualified Presumption of Safety (hereinafter referred to as "QPS") [6] was established by the Authority as a tool for the assessment of the safety of micro-organisms that are introduced into the food chain either directly or as a source of additives or food enzymes.
Agencija je oblikovala koncept priznane domneve o varnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDV) [6] kot orodje za oceno varnosti mikroorganizmov, vnesenih v prehransko verigo neposredno ali kot vir aditivov ali živilskih encimov.
This concept means that, where a strain of micro-organism is assigned to a QPS group and satisfies the qualifications specified, the Authority does not need to carry out any further safety assessment of the production strain.
Ta koncept pomeni, da kadar je sev mikroorganizma vključen v skupino PDV in izpolnjuje zahtevane lastnosti, Agencija ni obvezana izvesti kakršnih koli dodatnih ocen varnosti proizvodnega seva.
Therefore, if the micro-organism used in the production of a food enzyme has a status of QPS according to the most recent list of QPS recommended biological agents adopted by the Authority, the enzyme application should not be required to include toxicological data.
Če ima mikroorganizem, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji živilskega encima, status PDV na najnovejšem seznamu priporočenih bioloških dejavnikov z PDV, ki jih je sprejela Agencija, se ne sme zahtevati, da zahtevek za encime vključuje toksikološke podatke.
However, if residues, impurities, degradation products linked to the total enzyme production process (production, recovery and purification) could give rise for concern the Authority, pursuant to Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008, may request additional data for risk assessment, including toxicological data.
Vendar če so ostanki, nečistoče in razgradni produkti, ki nastanejo v celotnem postopku proizvodnje encima (proizvodnja, pridobivanje in čiščenje), lahko vzrok za zaskrbljenost, lahko Agencija v skladu s členom 6(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1331/2008 zahteva dodatne podatke za oceno tveganja, vključno s toksikološkimi podatki.
Pursuant to Article 6(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1332/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food enzymes [7] a food enzyme may be included in the Union list only if it does not, on the basis of the scientific evidence available, pose a safety concern to the health of the consumer at the level of use proposed.
V skladu s členom 6(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1332/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o encimih za živila [7] se lahko živilski encim vključi v seznam Unije le, če na podlagi razpoložljivih znanstvenih dokazov v predlagani količini ne ogroža zdravja potrošnika.
The reduction of data required for risk assessment in relation to food enzymes obtained from edible parts of non genetically modified animals and plants, and from micro-organisms that have a status of QPS does not have a negative impact on the quality of the risk assessment based on the SCF and the Authority’s guidance.
Zmanjšanje kategorij podatkov, potrebnih za oceno tveganja v zvezi z živilskimi encimi, pridobljenimi iz užitnih delov gensko nespremenjenih živali in rastlin ter iz mikroorganizmov s statusom PDV, nima negativnega učinka na kakovost ocene tveganja, ki temelji na smernicah SCF in Agencije.
With regard to grouping of specified food enzymes in one application, the Authority has already indicated in its guidance on data requirements for the evaluation of food enzyme applications that specified food enzymes with the same catalytic activity, produced by the same micro-organism strain and by the substantially same manufacturing process may be grouped in one application, even if as a rule each individual food enzyme must be assessed.
Glede združevanja specifičnih živilskih encimov v en zahtevek je Agencija v svojih smernicah glede zahtev po podatkih za oceno zahtevkov za živilske encime že navedla, da se lahko specifični živilski encimi z isto katalitično aktivnostjo, proizvedeni iz istega seva mikroorganizma in po praktično enakem proizvodnem postopku, združijo v en zahtevek, tudi če je treba praviloma ločeno oceniti vsak živilski encim.