natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Urges the Commission to continue its efforts towards strengthening the Haitian government and administration;
poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za krepitev vlade in uprave Haitija;
requests the Commission to report on the situation and on the actions taken;
od Komisije zahteva, da poroča o razmerah in o sprejetih ukrepih;
Regrets the insufficient coordination between the Union delegation and the Commission’s European Community Humanitarian Office’s representation;
obžaluje, da je usklajevanje med delegacijo Unije in predstavništvom urada Komisije za humanitarno pomoč nezadostno;
supports a reinforced coordination between all Union actors in the country;
podpira okrepljeno usklajevanje med vsemi akterji Unije v državi;
urges therefore the Commission to ensure better coherence and complementarity between humanitarian aid and development aid both at a policy level and in practice;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi, da bosta humanitarna in razvojna pomoč bolj povezani in da se bosta bolj dopolnjevali tako na ravni politike kot v praksi;
Urges the Commission to ensure that the postponed, first ever overall impact evaluation of the Union’s aid programme for Haiti takes place in 2013;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo leta 2013 izvedena prva celovita ocena učinka programa pomoči Unije za Haiti, ki je bila preložena;
Insists that, in light of the fact that currently it is impossible for both Parliament and the citizens of the Union to access information about the results achieved by Union funded programmes and projects in Haiti, the Commission substantially improves its policy on public accessibility of programme and projects monitoring before the end of 2013;
vztraja, da Komisija pred koncem leta 2013 bistveno izboljša politiko v zvezi z javno dostopnostjo spremljanja programa in projektov, glede na to, da trenutno niti Parlament niti državljani Unije nimajo dostopa do informacij o rezultatih, ki jih je dosegla Unija s programi in projekti, ki jih financira na Haitiju;
Is deeply concerned by the Court of Auditors’ finding that the majority of errors for payments were found in grants and contribution agreements with international organisations where 58 % of audited transactions were affected by error;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitve Računskega sodišča, da se je večina napak pojavila pri izplačilih v okviru sporazumov o subvencijah in prispevkih z mednarodnimi organizacijami, kjer je prišlo do napak pri 58 % revidiranih transakcij;
finds, therefore, that the safeguards for the implementation of control and the follow-up of Union funds under joint management are not satisfactory and calls on all parties involved to remedy this situation;
zato meni, da zaščitni ukrepi pri izvajanju nadzora in spremljanja sredstev Unije pod skupnim upravljanjem niso ustrezni, in poziva vse udeležene strani, naj to stanje izboljšajo;
Regrets that it has taken this long for the World Bank Group’s (WBG) undertaking to share their internal audit reports with the Commission Services;
obžaluje, da je Skupina Svetovne banke (WBG) potrebovala toliko časa, da s službami Komisije izmenja svoja poročila o notranji reviziji;
regrets that so far, there are no sustainable solutions and procedures for the provision of necessary financial information from the WBG to the Union institutions in each and every case;
obžaluje, da niso vzpostavljene trajnostne rešitve in postopki, ki bi omogočali WBG, da v vsakem posameznem primeru institucijam Unije posreduje potrebne finančne informacije;
calls on the WBG and the Commission to promptly arrive at a satisfactory outcome of the discussions in that area;
poziva WBG in Komisijo, naj na podlagi razprav na tem področju hitro sprejmeta zadovoljive sklepe;
calls on the Commission to report to Parliament on the progress of those discussions;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu poroča o napredku teh razprav;
Agrees with the Commission that in the event that no sustainable solution is found for the provision of the necessary financial information from the WBG to the relevant Union institution it will have consequences for the future cooperation with the WBG;
se strinja s Komisijo, da bo, če ne bo mogoče najti trajnostne rešitve za posredovanja potrebnih finančnih informacij Skupine svetovne banke zadevnim institucijam Unije, občutiti posledice za prihodnje sodelovanje s to skupino;
calls on the Commission to stop its grants and contribution agreements with the WBG if no solution is found;
poziva Komisijo, naj ukine nepovratna sredstva in sporazume o prispevkih s Skupino svetovne banke, če ne bo mogoče najti rešitve;
The investment facility
Investicijski sklad
Recalls that the funds allocated to the investment facility from the Ninth and Tenth EDF amounted to EUR 3185,5 million for ACP countries and OCTs;
opominja, da so sredstva, dodeljena investicijskemu skladu iz 9. in 10. ERS za države AKP in ČDO, znašala 3185,5 milijona EUR;
Reiterates its regret that the investment facility is not covered by the Court of Auditors’ Statement of Assurance or Parliament’s discharge procedure, even though the operations are conducted by EIB on behalf of and at the risk of the Union, using EDF resources;
ponovno izraža obžalovanje, da se za investicijski sklad ne uporabljata niti izjava Računskega sodišča o zanesljivosti niti postopek razrešnice Evropskega parlamenta, čeprav EIB izvaja dejavnosti v imenu in na odgovornost Unije ter pri tem uporablja sredstva ERS;
Welcomes the good cooperation of the EIB management with Parliament in the context of the annual discharge procedure to the EDF in the form of exchange of views during committee meetings;
pozdravlja dobro sodelovanje uprave EIB s Parlamentom v okviru letnega postopka razrešnice za ERS z izmenjavo mnenj na sejah odbora;
Welcomes the introduction as of 1 January 2012, of the new Results Measurement Framework (REM) for all its operations outside the Union which will provide for an ex-ante assessment of the expected contribution to Union and country development objectives (pillar 1), the expected quality and results of operations, including economic, social, environmental and institutional outcomes of the project (pillar 2), and the expected additionality of the EIB relative to market alternatives (pillar 3), as well as for monitoring of indicators until such time as the project is fully implemented and operational and the first development outcomes are measurable;
pozdravlja uvedbo novega okvira za merjenje rezultatov, ki se od 1. januarja 2012 uporablja za vse njene operacije zunaj Unije in ki bo zagotavljal predhodno oceno pričakovanega prispevka k uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev na ravni Unije in nacionalni ravni (steber 1), pričakovane kakovosti in rezultatov operacij, vključno z ekonomskimi, socialnimi, okoljskimi in institucionalnimi rezultati projekta (steber 2), ter pričakovane dodane vrednosti EIB v zvezi z alternativami na trgu (steber 3), pa tudi spremljanje kazalnikov, dokler ne bo projekt v celoti izveden in bo mogoče izmeriti prve razvojne rezultate;
expects the EIB to provide for the first assessment of the functioning of the REM in the context of the discharge procedure for the year 2012;
pričakuje, da bo EIB predložila prvo oceno delovanja tega okvira v postopku razrešnice za leto 2012;
Reiterates its call on the EIB to link its financing of projects more directly to poverty reduction and the achievement of the MDGs, human rights, democracy, good governance, corporate social responsibility, decent work and environmental principles;
ponovno poziva EIB, naj financiranje projektov tesneje poveže z zmanjševanjem revščine in doseganjem razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, človekovimi pravicami, demokracijo, dobrim upravljanjem, družbeno odgovornostjo podjetij, dostojnim delom ter okoljskimi načeli;
Welcomes the stated aim of the EIB with regards to ensuring a restrictive lending policy towards the financing of new coal and lignite-fuelled power stations;
pozdravlja namero EIB, da bo oblikovala omejevalno posojilno politiko v zvezi s financiranjem novih elektrarn na premog in lignit;
urges the EIB to implement this policy;
poziva EIB, naj uvede to politiko;
Welcomes the steps taken by the EIB in response to Parliament’s calls for more transparency in the form of the publication of each new loan on the EIB website in advance of approval by the Board, listing each financial intermediary that benefits from an EIB on the EIB website (including contact information), and requesting EIB small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) loan intermediaries to implement a dedicated product page on their web site for the SME community;
pozdravlja ukrepe EIB, ki jih je izvedla na podlagi pozivov Parlamenta k večji preglednosti, in sicer objavo vsakega novega posojila na spletnem mestu EIB, preden ga odobri upravni odbor, navedbo vsakega finančnega posrednika, ki uživa ugodnosti EIB, na spletnem mestu EIB (vključno s kontaktnimi informacijami) ter zahtevo, da kreditni posredniki EIB za mala in srednja podjetja na svojih spletnih mestih za skupnost malih in srednjih podjetij vzpostavijo posebno stran za namenske produkte;
Reiterates that the tripartite agreement between the Commission, the EIB and the Court of Auditors defines the role of the Court of Auditors in controlling the EDFs managed by the EIB;
ponovno opozarja, da tristranski sporazum med Komisijo, EIB in Računskim sodiščem določa vlogo Računskega sodišča pri nadzoru ERS, ki jih upravlja EIB;
repeats its call on the Court of Auditors to produce a Special Report on the effectiveness and efficiency of the EDFs managed by the EIB from the perspective of poverty reduction;
ponovno poziva Računsko sodišče, naj pripravi posebno poročilo o uspešnosti in učinkovitosti ERS, ki jih upravlja EIB, z vidika zmanjševanja revščine;
Notes furthermore that the present EIB Board of Directors consists of eight women and 20 men;
ugotavlja tudi, da je v sedanjem upravnem odboru Evropske investicijske banke osem žensk in 20 moških;
encourages the Member States to consider nominating candidates of both gender in order to achieve a more gender balanced representation on the EIB Board of Directors;
spodbuja države članice, naj razmislijo o imenovanju kandidatov obeh spolov, da bi dosegli zastopanje v tem odboru, ki bi bilo bolj uravnoteženo glede na spol;
Budgetisation of the EDF
Vključitev ERS v proračun
Emphasises the need for aid predictability and democratic scrutiny that only can be achieved when the EDF is part of the general budget of the Union;
poudarja, da sta potrebna predvidljivost pomoči in demokratična presoja, ki ju je mogoče doseči le, če je ERS del splošnega proračuna Unije;
emphasises the fact that budgetisation would reduce transaction costs and would simplify reporting and accounting requirements by having only one set of administrative rules and decision-making structures instead of two;
poudarja, da bi vključitev v proračun zmanjšala stroške poslov in poenostavila zahteve glede poročanja in računovodske zahteve, saj bi bil potreben zgolj en sklop upravnih pravil in struktur odločanja namesto dveh;
stresses that budgetisation of the EDF does not imply that total development cooperation spending may be reduced;
poudarja, da vključitev ERS v proračun ne pomeni, da se lahko zmanjša skupna poraba za razvojno sodelovanje;
Welcomes the Commission’s commitment [24] to propose EDF budgetisation for 2020, when the Cotonou Agreement expires;
pozdravlja zavezo Komisije [24], da bo predlagala vključitev ERS v proračun za leto 2020, ko se izteče Sporazum iz Cotonouja;
expects the Commission to honour this commitment and to take appropriate measures to facilitate incorporating the EDF into the Union’s budget starting with the post-2020 MFF;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija to zavezo izpolnila in sprejela ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi bo omogočila vključitev ERS v proračun Unije, začenši z večletnim finančnim okvirom po letu 2020;
is of the opinion that, in light of the current budgetary and economic crisis, the risk of EDF budgetisation leading to a decrease in the overall funding level for cooperation with ACP partners is too high at present;
glede na sedanjo proračunsko in gospodarsko krizo meni, da trenutno obstaja previsoko tveganje, da bi vključitev ERS v proračun privedla do zmanjšanja skupne ravni sredstev za sodelovanje s partnericami AKP;
insists therefore that, were budgetisation to be considered for the MFF 2014–2020, it must imply transferring the entire EDF financial envelope as proposed by the Commission (EUR 30,3 billion in 2011 prices) [25] to heading 4 on Global Europe and should under no circumstances be used as a pretext for reducing overall spending ceilings for Union’s external action in general, and development assistance in particular;
če se bo torej pri VFO 2014–2020 upoštevala vključitev v proračun, vztraja, da se celotna finančna sredstva ERS, kakor jih predlaga Komisija (30,3 milijarde EUR v cenah za leto 2011) [25], prenesejo v razdelek 4 o globalni Evropi, to pa se ne sme v nobenem primeru uporabiti kot pretveza za zmanjšanje skupne omejitve porabe za zunanje delovanje Unije na splošno in zlasti za razvojno pomoč;
Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to align the Parliament’s scrutiny rights over the EDF to those it has over the Union’s general budget, in particular the Development Cooperation Instrument;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije, da bi nadzorne pravice Parlamenta nad ERS uskladila s pravicami, ki jih ima glede splošnega proračuna Unije, zlasti v povezavi z instrumentom razvojnega sodelovanja;
urges the Commission to bring forward without delay concrete proposals to this effect and to initiate a dialogue to establish the precise modalities for Parliament’s future scrutiny over strategic decision-making regarding the EDF.
poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem brez odlašanja predloži konkretne predloge in začne dialog za natančno določitev podrobnosti nadzora Parlamenta nad strateškim odločanjem v zvezi z ERS v prihodnje.
OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p. 373.
UL C 306 E, 15.12.2006, str. 373.
OJ C 279 E, 19.11.2009, p. 100.
UL C 279 E, 19.11.2009, str. 100.
The above-mentioned Annual Report on the financial management of the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth European Development Funds (EDFs) in 2011.
Zgoraj navedeno letno poročilo o finančnem poslovodenju 8., 9. in 10. Evropskega razvojnega sklada (ERS) v letu 2011.
OJ C 199 E, 7.7.2012, p. 37.
UL C 199 E, 7.7.2012, str. 37.
Commission’s communication of 21 April 2010 entitled ‘Tax and Development – Cooperating with Developing Countries on Promoting Good Governance in Tax Matters’.
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 21. aprila 2010 z naslovom „Obdavčenje in razvoj – sodelovanje z državami v razvoju pri spodbujanju dobrega upravljanja v davčnih zadevah“,
Special Reports by the European Court of Auditors Nos 1/2010 and 13/2011.
Posebni poročili Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 1/2010 in št. 13/2011.
Commission Staff Working Document ‘Annual Report 2012 on the European Union’s Development and external assistance policies and their implementation in 2011’, p. 67.
Delovni dokument služb Komisije „Letno poročilo 2012 o razvojni politiki in politiki zunanje pomoči Evropske unije ter njunem izvajanju v letu 2011, str. 67.“
Idem, p. 90.
Prav tam, str. 90.
Idem, p. 113.
Prav tam, str. 113.
Commission communication of 13 October 2011 entitled ‘The future approach to EU budget support to third countries’.
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 13. oktobra 2011 z naslovom „Prihodnji pristop k proračunski podpori EU za tretje države“.
As requested in paragraph 52 of Parliament’s Resolution of 5 July 2011 on the future of EU budget support to developing countries (Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0317), and paragraph 42 of the discharge report for 2010.
Kot zahteva odstavek 52 resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. julija 2011 o prihodnosti proračunske podpore EU državam v razvoju (Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0317) in odstavek 42 poročila o razrešnici za leto 2010.
Commission communication of 29 June 2011 entitled ‘A budget for Europe 2020’.
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 29. junija 2011 z naslovom „Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020“.
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2011, Section X — European External Action Service
o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011, oddelek X – Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje
having regard to the European Union general budget for the financial year 2011 [1],having regard to the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 (COM(2012) 436 — C7-0235/2012) [2],having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on implementation of the budget for the financial year 2011, together with the institutions’ replies [3],having regard to the statement of assurance [4] as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors for the financial year 2011 pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,having regard to Article 314(10) and Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 [1],ob upoštevanju konsolidiranega zaključnega računa Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 (COM(2012) 436 – C7-0235/2012) [2],ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2011, skupaj z odgovori institucij [3],ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti [4] računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je za proračunsko leto 2011 v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pripravilo Računsko sodišče,ob upoštevanju člena 314(10) ter členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Articles 50, 86, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [6], and in particular Articles 164, 165, 166 and 167 thereof,having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], zlasti členov 50, 86, 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 [6], zlasti členov 164, 165, 166 in 167 Uredbe,ob upoštevanju člena 77 in Priloge VI Poslovnika,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A7-0099/2013),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve (A7-0099/2013),
Grants the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy discharge in respect of the implementation of the European External Action Service’s budget for the financial year 2011;
podeli razrešnico visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje za proračunsko leto 2011;
with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2011, Section X — European External Action Service
s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011, oddelek X – Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje
A. whereas the European External Action Services (EEAS) was set up by Article 27(3) of the Treaty on European Union and became operational on 1 January 2011,
A. ker je bila s členom 27(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ustanovljena Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje (ESZD), ki je začela delovati 1. januarja 2011;
B. whereas according to Recital 1 of Council Decision 2010/427/EU of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service [7], the EEAS is a ‘functionally autonomous body of the Union under the authority of the High Representative [of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy]’ (‘the High Representative’),
B. ker uvodna izjava 1 Sklepa Sveta 2010/427/EU z dne 26. julija 2010 o organizaciji in delovanju Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje [7] slednjo opredeljuje kot „delovno samostojno telo Unije pod vodstvom visokega predstavnika [Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko]“ (v nadaljevanju: visoki predstavnik);
C. whereas the Commission has legal primacy over the management of operational expenditure;
C. ker ima Komisija s pravnega vidika prednost pri upravljanju odhodkov iz poslovanja;
whereas a division of responsibilities between the EEAS and the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments attached to the Commission has been established,
ker je bila vzpostavljena delitev pristojnosti med ESZD in službo za instrumente zunanje politike, ki deluje pod okriljem Komisije;
D. whereas the EEAS is responsible for the financial management of the administrative expenditure of its headquarters and Union delegations,
D. ker je ESZD odgovorna za finančno upravljanje upravnih odhodkov svojega sedeža in delegacij Unije;
E. whereas the EEAS budget for 2011 consisted of pro-rata budget transfers from the Commission and the General Secretariat of the Council,
E. ker je bil proračun ESZD za leto 2011 sestavljen iz sorazmernih proračunskih prerazporeditev Komisije in generalnega sekretariata Sveta;
Notes that on the basis of its audit work, the Court of Auditors concluded that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2011 for administrative and other expenditure of the institutions and bodies were free from material error;
poudarja, da je Računsko sodišče na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela menilo, da v plačilih za upravne in druge odhodke institucij in organov kot celoti za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2011, ni bilo pomembnih napak;
Notes that while 2011 was the first financial year for the EEAS, it is, however, fully responsible for the financial year 2011 and has to ensure strict compliance with the legislation;
ugotavlja, da je bilo leto 2011 za ESZD sicer prvo proračunsko leto, a je vseeno v celoti odgovorna zanj in mora zagotoviti dosledno spoštovanje zakonodaje;
urges the EEAS to examine what lessons can be learned from the first year of operation;
poziva ESZD, naj preuči, kaj lahko ugotovi na osnovi prvega leta delovanja;
Points out that in the 2011 annual report, the Court of Auditors included observations on the EEAS concerning the payment of social allowances and benefits to staff members, the conclusion of contracts with temporary agents, the management of a contract for the provision of security services and procurement procedures;
poudarja, da je Računsko sodišče v letno poročilo 2011 vključilo ugotovitve glede ESZD v zvezi z izplačevanjem socialnih dodatkov in prejemkov uslužbencem, sklepanjem pogodb z začasnimi uslužbenci, upravljanjem pogodbe za zagotavljanje varnostnih storitev in postopki javnega naročanja;
urges the EEAS to take the necessary steps to address those observations;
poziva ESZD, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da se bo odzvala na te ugotovitve;
Is concerned that the Court of Auditors found that non-compliance with the rules has lead to a limited number of incorrect payments to staff members, legal uncertainty for temporary staff and for the EEAS, failure to respect the Financial Regulation and unrecovered VAT and a breach of the procurement rules which all Union institutions are bound to comply with;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da je neupoštevanje predpisov povzročilo omejeno število nepravilnih izplačil uslužbencem, pravno negotovost za začasne uslužbence in ESZD, nespoštovanje finančne uredbe in nepovrnjen DDV ter kršitev pravil o javnem naročanju, ki jih morajo upoštevati vse institucije Unije;