natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The new Member States may decide, on the basis of objective criteria and within the limits authorised by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 5, on the amounts of transitional national aid to be granted.’;
Nove države članice se lahko na podlagi objektivnih meril in v okviru omejitev, ki jih v skladu z odstavkom 5 potrdi Komisija, odločijo o odobrenih zneskih prehodne državne pomoči.“;
Articles 134 and 135 are deleted;
člena 134 in 135 se črtata;
Article 136 is deleted;
člen 136 se črta;
Article 139 is replaced by the following:
člen 139 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Article 139
„Člen 139
By way of derogation from Article 180 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1184/2006 of 24 July 2006 applying certain rules of competition to the production of, and trade in, agricultural products, Articles 107, 108 and 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union shall not apply to payments made under Articles 41, 57, 64, 68, 69, 70 and 71, Article 82(2), Article 86, Articles 98(4) and 111(5), Article 120, Article 129(3) and Articles 131, 132, 133 and 133a of this Regulation by Member States in conformity with this Regulation.(13) the following Articles are inserted:
Z odstopanjem od člena 180 Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 in člena 3 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1184/2006 z dne 24. julija 2006 o uporabi nekaterih pravil konkurence v proizvodnji in trgovini s kmetijskimi proizvodi se členi 107, 108 in 109 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ne uporabljajo za plačila, ki jih izvedejo države članice na podlagi členov 41, 57, 64, 68, 69, 70 in 71, člena 82(2), člena 86, člena 98(4) in člena 111(5), člena 120, člena 129(3), členov 131, 132 in 133 ter člena 133a te uredbe in v skladu s to uredbo.13. vstavita se naslednja člena:
‘Article 141a
„Člen 141a
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 11a shall be conferred on the Commission for a period from 1 September 2012 until 31 December 2013.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 11a se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje od 1. septembra 2012 do 31. decembra 2013.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 11a may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Pooblastilo iz člena 11a lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 11a shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
Delegirani akt, sprejet v skladu s členom 11a, začne veljati le, če niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu v roku dveh mesecev od uradnega obvestila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o tem aktu, ali če sta pred iztekom tega roka tako Evropski parlament kot Svet obvestila Komisijo, da ne bosta nasprotovala.
Article 141b
Člen 141b
The Commission shall be assisted by the Rural Development Committee established by Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
Komisiji pomaga Odbor za razvoj podeželja, ustanovljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 1698/2005.
That committee is a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers.
Ta odbor je odbor v smislu Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države členice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije.
in Annex IV, the following column is added:
v Prilogi IV se doda naslednji stolpec:
the following Annex is inserted:
vstavi se naslednja priloga:
By way of derogation from the second paragraph:
Z odstopanjem od drugega odstavka:
the following provisions shall apply from the date of entry into force of this Regulation:
se od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe uporabljajo naslednje določbe:
Article 10b(5), Article 10c(1) and (4) and Article 10d(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, as inserted by point (2) of Article 1 of this Regulation;
člen 10b(5), člen 10c(1) in (4) ter člen 10d(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, kot so vstavljeni v točki 2 člena 1 te uredbe;
Article 133a(5) and (6) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, as inserted by point (9) of Article 1 of this Regulation;
člen 133a(5) in (6) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, kot je vstavljen v točki 9 člena 1 te uredbe;
points (5), (6), (7), (8) and (13) of Article 1 of this Regulation;
točke 5, 6, 7, 8 in 13 člena 1 te uredbe;
points (1)(b) and (11) of Article 1 of this Regulation shall apply from 1 January 2014.
se točki 1(b) in 11 člena 1 te uredbe uporabljata od 1. januarja 2014.
OJ C 191, 29.6.2012, p. 116.
UL C 191, 29.6.2012, str. 116.
Opinion of 4 May 2012 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 4. maja 2012 (še ni bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Position of the European Parliament of 4 July 2012 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 10 July 2012.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. julija 2012 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 10. julija 2012.
OJ L 214, 4.8.2006, p. 7.’;
UL L 214, 4.8.2006, str. 7.“;
As a consequence, the total net amounts of direct payments (‘net ceilings’) which may be granted in a Member State, after the application of modulation, have been fixed until calendar year 2012.
Skupni neto zneski neposrednih plačil („neto zgornje meje“), ki se lahko odobrijo v državi članici po uporabi modulacije, so bili zato določeni do koledarskega leta 2012.
In order to maintain the amount of direct payments in calendar year 2013 on a level similar to that of 2012, with due account being taken of phasing-in in the new Member States, within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, it is appropriate to establish an adjustment mechanism for calendar year 2013 with an effect equivalent to that of modulation and the net ceilings.
Da bi se znesek neposrednih plačil v koledarskem letu 2013 ohranil na ravni, podobni ravni iz leta 2012, ob ustreznem upoštevanju postopnega uvajanja v novih državah članicah v smislu Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, je ustrezno vzpostaviti prilagoditveni mehanizem za koledarsko leto 2013, ki ima enakovreden učinek kot modulacija in neto zgornje meje.
Due to the special characteristics of the support in the outermost regions under the common agricultural policy, this adjustment mechanism should not be applied to farmers in those regions.
Zaradi posebnih značilnosti podpore najbolj oddaljenim regijam v okviru skupne kmetijske politike se ta prilagoditveni mehanizem ne bi smel uporabljati za kmete v teh regijah.
Where a Member State made use of the option provided for in Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 by deciding not to apply the maximum rate for the contribution from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) to the net amounts resulting from the application of voluntary modulation in the programming period 2007 to 2013, the same option should be made available to that Member State in respect of the funds raised through the voluntary adjustment of direct payments, in order to ensure continuity in the financing of public expenditure of the rural development measures in 2014.
Če je država članica uporabila možnost iz člena 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 378/2007, v skladu s katero se je odločila, da ne bo uporabila najvišje stopnje za prispevek iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) za neto zneske, ki izhajajo iz uporabe prostovoljne modulacije v programskem obdobju 2007–2013, bi moralo biti mogoče za to državo članico uporabiti enako možnost v zvezi s sredstvi, pridobljenimi s prostovoljno prilagoditvijo neposrednih plačil, da se zagotovi trajnost financiranja javnih odhodkov pri ukrepih za razvoj podeželja v letu 2014.
For reasons of consistency, the prefinancing arrangements for the rural development programmes should not apply to such funds.
Zaradi doslednosti se za ta sredstva ne bi smela uporabljati ureditev predfinanciranj za programe za razvoj podeželja.
The financial transfers to the EAFRD provided for in Articles 134 and 135 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 relate to the 2007-13 multiannual financial framework.
Finančni transferji v okviru EKSRP iz členov 134 in 135 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 se nanašajo na večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013.
The direct payments to be made by the Member States in respect of applications made in calendar year 2013 will have effects in financial year 2014, thereby falling under the next multiannual financial framework.
Neposredna plačila držav članic v zvezi z zahtevki, vloženimi v koledarskem letu 2013, bodo imela učinek v proračunskem letu 2014, ki spada v naslednji večletni finančni okvir.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 672/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 672/2012
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 791/2011 na uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken, dobavljenih iz Malezije, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirane kot izdelek s poreklom iz Malezije ali ne
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 [2], (‘the original Regulation’), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 62,9 % on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’) for all other companies than the ones mentioned in Article 1(2) and Annex I to that Regulation.
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 791/2011 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 62,9 % na uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) za vse družbe, ki niso navedene v členu 1(2) in Prilogi I k navedeni uredbi.
On 27 September 2011, the Commission received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the PRC and to make imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, subject to registration.
Komisija je 27. septembra 2011 prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, da razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim za uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz LRK, in uvede registracijo uvoza nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken, dobavljenih iz Malezije, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirane kot izdelek s poreklom iz Malezije ali ne.
The request was lodged by Saint-Gobain Adfors CZ s.r.o., Tolnatext Fonalfeldolgozó és Műszakiszövet-gyártó Bt., Valmieras stikla šķiedra AS and Vitrulan Technical Textiles GmbH, four Union producers of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres.
Zahtevek so vložile družbe Saint-Gobain Adfors CZ s.r.o., Tolnatext Fonalfeldolgozó és Műszakiszövet-gyártó Bt., Valmieras stikla šķiedra AS in Vitrulan Technical Textiles GmbH, štirje proizvajalci nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken v Uniji.
The request contained sufficient prima facie evidence that following the imposition of the measures in force, a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC and Malaysia to the Union occurred, for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the measures in force.
Zahtevek je vseboval zadostne dokaze prima facie, da se je po uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoz iz LRK in Malezije v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe veljavnih ukrepov ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko upravičena.
This change in the pattern of trade stemmed allegedly from the transhipment of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the PRC via Malaysia.
Ta sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja je domnevno posledica pretovarjanja nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz LRK prek Malezije.
Furthermore, the evidence pointed to the fact that the remedial effects of the measures in force were being undermined both in terms of quantity and price.
Poleg tega dokazi kažejo, da je bil popravljalni učinek veljavnih ukrepov oslabljen v smislu količine in cene.
The evidence showed that these increased imports from Malaysia were made at prices below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation.
Iz dokazov je razvidno, da se je povečal uvoz iz Malezije po cenah, ki so nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
Finally, there was evidence that prices of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres consigned from Malaysia were dumped in relation to the normal value established for the like product during the original investigation.
Dokazano pa je bilo tudi, da so bile cene nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken, dobavljenih iz Malezije, dampinške v primerjavi z normalno vrednostjo, določeno za podoben izdelek v prvotni preiskavi.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated an investigation by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1135/2011 [3] (‘the initiating Regulation’).
Ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi prima facie za začetek preiskave na podlagi člena 13(3) in člena 14(5) osnovne uredbe, je začela preiskavo z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1135/2011 [3] („uredba o začetku preiskave“).
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, by the initiating Regulation, also directed the customs authorities to register imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres consigned from Malaysia.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe z uredbo o začetku preiskave carinskim organom tudi naložila, da registrirajo uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken, dobavljenih iz Malezije.
The Commission officially notified the authorities of the PRC and Malaysia, the exporting producers in those countries, the importers in the Union known to be concerned and the Union industry of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila pristojne organe LRK in Malezije, proizvajalce izvoznike v navedenih državah, uvoznike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter industrijo Unije.
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in the PRC and Malaysia known to the Commission or which made themselves known within the deadlines specified in recital 14 of the initiating Regulation.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK in Maleziji, ki so bili Komisiji znani ali ki so se sami javili v rokih iz uvodne izjave 14 uredbe o začetku preiskave.
Three exporting producers in Malaysia, and three unrelated importers in the Union made themselves known and submitted replies to the questionnaires.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki v Maleziji in trije nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji so se javili in predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike.
The following exporting producers submitted replies to the questionnaires and verification visits were subsequently carried out at their premises.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so predložili naslednji proizvajalci izvozniki, nato pa so bili v njihovih prostorih opravljeni preveritveni obiski.
The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2008 to 30 September 2011 (‘the IP’).
Obdobje preiskave je trajalo od 1. januarja 2008 do 30. septembra 2011 („OP“).
Data were collected for the IP to investigate, inter alia, the alleged change in the pattern of trade.
Za OP so se med drugim zbirali podatki za preiskavo domnevne spremembe vzorca trgovanja.
More detailed data were collected for the reporting period 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011 (‘the RP’) in order to examine the possible undermining of the remedial effect of the measures in force and existence of dumping.
Za obdobje od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011 („obdobje poročanja“) so bili zbrani podrobnejši podatki, da bi se preverila morebitna oslabitev popravljalnega učinka veljavnih ukrepov in obstoj dampinga.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the investigation of the existence of circumvention was made by the successive analysis of whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, Malaysia and the Union; whether this change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty; whether there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the like product; and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe se je obstoj izogibanja ukrepom ugotavljal z zaporedno analizo, v kateri se je ugotavljalo, ali je prišlo v vzorcu trgovanja med LRK, Malezijo in Unijo do spremembe; ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dejavnosti, za katero razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko upravičena; ali so obstajali dokazi o škodi ali o tem, da je bil popravljalni učinek dajatve oslabljen v smislu cene in/ali količine podobnega izdelka; in ali so obstajali dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, predhodno določenimi za podobni izdelek, po potrebi v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
Product concerned and the product under investigation
Zadevni izdelek in izdelek v preiskavi
The product concerned is as defined in the original investigation: Open mesh fabrics of glass fibres, of a cell size of more than 1,8 mm both in length and in width and weighing more than 35 g/m2, excluding fibreglass discs, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes ex70195100, and ex70195900.
Zadevni izdelek je opredeljen v prvotni preiskavi: tkanine z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken z velikostjo celice več kot 1,8 mm po dolžini in širini ter težo več kot 35 g/m2, razen diskov iz steklenih vlaken, s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex70195100 in ex70195900.
The product under investigation is the same as that defined in the previous recital, but consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not.
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak izdelku, kakor je opredeljen v predhodni uvodni izjavi, vendar je dobavljen iz Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je njegovo poreklo deklarirano v Maleziji ali ne.
The investigation showed that open mesh fabrics of glass fibres, as defined above, exported from the PRC to the Union and those consigned from Malaysia to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo tkanine z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken, kakor so opredeljene zgoraj, izvožene v Unijo iz LRK, in tiste, poslane v Unijo iz Malezije, enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti ter enako uporabo, zato se jih šteje za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As stated in recital 10, three exporting producers in Malaysia submitted questionnaire replies.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10, so trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz Malezije predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike.
On the spot verification visits were subsequently carried out to these three exporting producers.
Nato so bili pri teh treh proizvajalcih izvoznikih opravljeni preveritveni obiski na kraju samem.
The three Malaysian exporting producers covered 75 % of the total exports of the product under investigation from Malaysia to the Union in the RP as reported in Comext [4].The overall export volumes were based on Comext.
Po podatkih COMEXT [4] so trije malezijski proizvajalci izvozniki zajemali 75 % celotnega izvoza izdelka v preiskavi iz Malezije v Unijo v obdobju poročanja. Celoten obseg izvoza je bil določen na podlagi podatkov COMEXT.
One of the three Malaysian exporting producers, stopped cooperating following the first day of the verification visit, therefore Article 18 of the basic Regulation was applied.
Eden od treh malezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je po prvem dnevu preveritvenega obiska prekinil sodelovanje, zato je bil pri njem uporabljen člen 18 osnovne uredbe.
For the other two companies the application of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation was also found to be warranted for the reasons explained in recitals 34 and 52 to 59.
Za drugi dve družbi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je uporaba člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe upravičena iz razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodnih izjavah 34 in 52 do 59.
There was no cooperation from the PRC exporting producers.
Proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK niso bili pripravljeni sodelovati.
Therefore, findings in respect of imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres from PRC into the Union and exports of the product concerned from the PRC to Malaysia had to be made partially on the basis of facts available in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo treba ugotovitve v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken iz LRK v Unijo ter izvozom zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Malezijo delno sprejeti na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe.
Comext data was used to determine overall import volumes from the PRC to the Union.
Celoten obseg uvoza iz LRK v Unijo je bil določen na podlagi podatkov COMEXT.
PRC and Malaysian national statistics were used for the determination of the overall exports from the PRC to Malaysia.
Celoten izvoz iz LRK v Malezijo je bil določen na podlagi nacionalnih statističnih podatkov LRK in Malezije.
Data were also cross-checked with detailed import and export data that were provided by the customs authorities of Malaysia.
Podatki so bili tudi navzkrižno preverjeni in potrjeni s podrobnimi uvoznimi in izvoznimi podatki, ki so jih poslali carinski organi Malezije.
The import volume recorded in Malaysian and PRC statistics covered a larger product group than the product concerned or the product under investigation.
Obseg uvoza, evidentiran v malezijskih statističnih podatkih in statističnih podatkih LRK, je vključeval skupino izdelkov, ki je večja od zadevnega izdelka ali izdelka v preiskavi.
However, in view of Comext data and the data provided by the three Malaysian exporting producers, it could be established that a significant part of this import volume covered the product concerned.
Vendar pa je bilo na podlagi podatkov COMEXT in podatkov, ki so jih predložili trije malezijski proizvajalci izvozniki, mogoče določiti, da je zadevni izdelek zajemal znatni del obsega tega uvoza.
Accordingly, these data could be used to establish a change in the pattern of trade.
Zato je bilo te podatke mogoče uporabiti za ugotovitev spremembe vzorca trgovanja.
Imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres into the Union
Uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken v Unijo