natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annex II to Decision 92/260/EEC is amended in accordance with Annex I to this Decision.
Priloga II k Odločbi 92/260/EGS se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo I k temu sklepu.
Annex II to Decision 93/196/EEC is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Decision.
Priloga II k Odločbi 93/196/EGS se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo II k temu sklepu.
Annex I to Decision 93/197/EEC is amended in accordance with Annex III to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 93/197/EGS se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo III k temu sklepu.
Annex I to Decision 2004/211/EC is amended in accordance with Annex IV to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 2004/211/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo IV k temu sklepu.
Commission Decision 2004/211/EC of 6 January 2004 establishing the list of third countries and parts of territory thereof from which Member States authorise imports of live equidae and semen, ova and embryos of the equine species, and amending Decisions 93/195/EEC and 94/63/EC (OJ L 73, 11.3.2004, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije 2004/211/ES z dne 6. januarja 2004 o uvedbi seznama tretjih držav in delov njihovega ozemlja, s katerih države članice dovolijo uvoz živih kopitarjev in semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov vrste kopitarji, ter o spremembi odločb 93/195/EGS in 94/63/ES (UL L 73, 11.3.2004, str. 1).
Commission Decision 92/260/EEC of 10 April 1992 on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for temporary admission of registered horses (OJ L 130, 15.5.1992, p. 67).
Odločba Komisije 92/260/EGS z dne 10. aprila 1992 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali in izdajanjem veterinarskih spričeval za začasen sprejem registriranih konjev (UL L 130, 15.5.1992, str. 67).
Commission Decision 93/195/EEC of 2 February 1993 on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export (OJ L 86, 6.4.1993, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije 93/195/EGS z dne 2. februarja 1993 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali in izdajanju veterinarskih spričeval za ponovni vstop registriranih konjev za dirke, tekmovanja in kulturne prireditve po začasnem izvozu (UL L 86, 6.4.1993, str. 1).
Commission Decision 93/196/EEC of 5 February 1993 on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of equidae for slaughter (OJ L 86, 6.4.1993, p. 7).
Odločba Komisije 93/196/EGS z dne 5. februarja 1993 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali in izdajanjem veterinarskih spričeval za uvoz kopitarjev za zakol (UL L 86, 6.4.1993, str. 7).
Commission Decision 93/197/EEC of 5 February 1993 on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production (OJ L 86, 6.4.1993, p. 16).
Odločba Komisije 93/197/EGS z dne 5. februarja 1993 o pogojih zdravstvenega varstva živali in izdajanju veterinarskih spričeval pri uvozu registriranih kopitarjev ter kopitarjev za pleme in proizvodnjo (UL L 86, 6.4.1993, str. 16).
Audit Report 2012-6398, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fvo/rep_details_en.cfm?rep_id=3022
Poročilo o reviziji 2012-6398 je na voljo na: http://ec.europa.eu/food/fvo/rep_details_en.cfm?rep_id=3022
Annex II to Decision 92/260/EEC is amended as follows:
Priloga II k Odločbi 92/260/ES se spremeni:
in the model health certificate A, in point (d) of Part III, the third indent is replaced by the following:
v vzorcu veterinarskega spričevala A se tretja alineja v točki (d) dela III nadomesti z naslednjim:
United Arab Emirates, Australia, Belarus, Canada, Switzerland, Greenland, Hong Kong, Iceland, Japan, Republic of Korea, Montenegro, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Macao, Malaysia (peninsula), Norway, New Zealand, Serbia, Russia (1), Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, United States of America’;
v Združenih arabskih emiratih, v Avstraliji, v Belorusiji, v Kanadi, v Švici, na Grenlandiji, v Hongkongu, na Islandiji, na Japonskem, v Republiki Koreji, v Črni gori, v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji, v Makau, v Maleziji (polotoku), na Norveškem, na Novi Zelandiji, v Srbiji, v Rusiji (1), v Singapurju, na Tajskem, v Ukrajini, v Združenih državah Amerike.“;
in the model health certificate B, in point (d) of Part III, the third indent is replaced by the following:
v vzorcu veterinarskega spričevala B se tretja alinea v točki (d) dela III nadomesti z naslednjim:
in the model health certificate C, in point (d) of Part III, the third indent is replaced by the following:
v vzorcu veterinarskega spričevala C se tretja alinea v točki (d) dela III nadomesti z naslednjim:
in the model health certificate D, Part III is amended as follows:
v vzorcu veterinarskega spričevala D se del III spremeni:
in point (d), the third indent is replaced by the following:
tretja alinea v točki (d) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
the following point (l) is added:
doda se naslednja točka (l):
If the horse comes from Brazil (1), it was subjected to a complement fixation test for glanders carried out with negative result at a serum dilution of 1 in 10 on a sample of blood collected on … (4) (5), this being during the 10 days prior to dispatch.’;
Če konj prihaja iz Brazilije (1), je bil na njem opravljen test reakcije vezanja komplementa za smrkavost, rezultat pa je negativen pri razredčini seruma 1:10 na vzorcu krvi, odvzetem dne … (4) (5), ki je v 10 dneh pred odpremo.“;
in the model health certificate E, in point (d) of Part III, the third indent is replaced by the following:
v vzorcu veterinarskega spričevala E se tretja alinea v točki (d) dela III nadomesti z naslednjim:
United Arab Emirates, Australia, Belarus, Canada, Switzerland, Greenland, Hong Kong, Iceland, Japan, Republic of Korea, Montenegro, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Macao, Malaysia (peninsula), Norway, New Zealand, Serbia, Russia (1), Singapore, Thailand, Ukraine, United States of America’.
v Združenih arabskih emiratih, v Avstraliji, v Belorusiji, v Kanadi, v Švici, na Grenlandiji, v Hongkongu, na Islandiji, na Japonskem, v Republiki Koreji, v Črni gori, v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji, v Makau, v Maleziji (polotoku), na Norveškem, na Novi Zelandiji, v Srbiji, v Rusiji (1), v Singapurju, na Tajskem, v Ukrajini, v Združenih državah Amerike.“
In Annex II to Decision 93/196/EEC, footnote (3) is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi II k Odločbi 93/196/EGS se opomba 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Sanitary Groups according to Annex I to Commission Decision 2004/211/EC:
Skupine ustrezajo seznamu v Prilogi I k Odločbi 2004/211/ES:
Australia (AU), Belarus (BY), Montenegro (ME), the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (MK), New Zealand (NZ), Serbia (RS), Russia (1) (RU), Ukraine (UA)
Avstralija (AU), Belorusija (BY), Črna gora (ME), Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija (MK), Nova Zelandija (NZ), Srbija (RS), Rusija (1) (RU), Ukrajina (UA)
Canada (CA), United States of America (US)
Kanada (CA), Združene države Amerike (US)
Algeria (DZ), Israel (IL), Morocco (MA), Tunisia (TN)’.
Alžirija (DZ), Izrael (IL), Maroko (MA), Tunizija (TN)“
In Annex I to Decision 93/197/EEC, the text relating to ‘Sanitary Group D’ is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Odločbi 93/197/ES se besedilo za „Skupino D“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Sanitary Group D(1)
„Skupina D(1)
Argentina (AR), Barbados(3) (BB), Bermuda(3) (BM), Bolivia(3) (BO), Brazil(2)(3) (BR), Chile (CL), Cuba(3) (CU), Jamaica(3) (JM), Mexico(2) (MX), Peru(2)(3) (PE), Paraguay (PY), Uruguay (UY)’.
Argentina (AR), Barbados(3) (BB), Bermudi(3) (BM), Bolivija(3) (BO), Brazilija(2)(3) (BR), Čile (CL), Kuba(3) (CU), Jamajka(3) (JM), Mehika(2) (MX), Peru(2)(3) (PE), Paragvaj (PY), Urugvaj (UY)“.
In Annex I to Decision 2004/211/EC, the entry for Brazil is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Odločbi 2004/211/ES se vnos za Brazilijo nadomesti z naslednjim:
On 25 February 2013, the Commission published the report [8] of an audit on exports to the Union of equidae and their germinal products, carried out in Brazil in October 2012.
Komisija je 25. februarja 2013 objavila poročilo [8] o reviziji izvoza enoprstih kopitarjev in njihovega zarodnega materiala iz Brazilije v Unijo, ki jo je opravila oktobra 2012.
According to that report, it is necessary to suspend imports of semen, ova and embryos of animals of the equine species from Brazil, until the recommended corrective actions are accomplished and verified.
V skladu z navedenim poročilom je treba začasno ustaviti uvoz semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov enoprstih kopitarjev iz Brazilije, dokler ne bodo priporočeni korektivni ukrepi izvedeni in preverjeni.
State aid SA.33305 (2012/C) and SA.29832 (2012/C) implemented by Netherlands for ING
Državna pomoč SA.33305 (2012/C) in SA.29832 (2012/C) Nizozemske za družbo ING
(notified under document C(2012) 8238)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 8238)
Having called on MemberStatesand other interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1],
po pozivu državam članicam in drugim zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1],
On 22 October 2008, the Netherlandsnotified to the Commission a EUR 10 billion capital increase ("the recapitalisation measure") in ING Groep N.V. ("ING") in the form of Core Tier 1 securities ("CT1 securities").
Nizozemska je 22. oktobra 2008 Komisiji priglasila povečanje kapitala v višini 10 milijard EUR (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep dokapitalizacije) v družbi ING Groep N.V. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ING) v obliki temeljnih vrednostnih papirjev prvega reda (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vrednostni papirji CT1).
By Decision of 12 November 2008 ("the Rescue Decision") [2], the Commission temporarily approved the recapitalisation measure as rescue aid in light of a number of commitments that the Netherlandsand ING provided.
Komisija je s sklepom z dne 12. novembra 2008 („sklep o reševanju“) [2] ob upoštevanju številnih zavez, ki sta jih zagotovili Nizozemska in ING, začasno odobrila ukrep dokapitalizacije kot pomoč za reševanje.
They included a commitment to re-notify the recapitalisation measure if either of the following situations were to arise which would make it considerably less likely that an overall return of at least 10 % per annum would be achieved [3]:
Navedene zaveze so vključevale zavezo k ponovni priglasitvi ukrepa dokapitalizacije v primeru ene od naslednjih situacij, zaradi česar bi bilo bistveno manj verjetno, da bo dosežen skupni prihodek v višini najmanj 10 % letno [3]:
If no dividend is paid out for a period of two consecutive years or for three years in the next five years ;or
če se v dveh zaporednih letih ali tri leta v naslednjih petih letih ne izplača nobena dividenda ali
If after a transition period of one year following the date of the present decision, the share price over a period of two consecutive years remains on average below 13 EUR.
če po prehodnem obdobju enega leta po datumu tega sklepa cena delnice v obdobju dveh zaporednih let v povprečju ostane nižja od 13 EUR.
In the Rescue Decision the Commission considered that, while the recapitalisation measure in itself would not be called into question if either of the re-notification scenarios were to arise, such a development might call into question the conditions of compatibility of the measure and that it might, in particular, require additional behavioural constraints if that measure was to continue to be compatible with the internal market.
Komisija je v sklepu o reševanju menila, da ukrep dokapitalizacije v primeru katerega od navedenih scenarijev ponovne priglasitve sam po sebi sicer ne bi bil vprašljiv, vendar lahko tak razvoj dogodkov vzbudi pomisleke glede pogojev za združljivost ukrepa in da bi lahko zlasti zahteval dodatne omejitve glede ravnanja, če naj bi bil še naprej združljiv z notranjim trgom.
On 22 October 2009 the Netherlands submitted a restructuring plan which included a catalogue of commitments.
Nizozemska je 22. oktobra 2009 predložila načrt prestrukturiranja, ki je vključeval katalog zavez.
By its Decision of 18 November 2009 [4] ("the 2009 Restructuring Decision"), the Commission approved the restructuring aid granted or to be granted to ING and its restructuring plan.
Komisija je z odločbo z dne 18 novembra 2009 [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločba o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2009) odobrila pomoč za prestrukturiranje, ki je ali bo dodeljena ING in njenemu načrtu prestrukturiranja.
In Article 1 of that Decision, the Commission closed a formal investigation procedure that it had opened into an impaired asset back-up facility which had been granted by the Netherlands to ING, approving that measure in the light of commitments given by the Netherlands.
V členu 1 navedene odločbe je Komisija zaključila formalni postopek preiskave, ki ga je začela zaradi rezervne kreditne linije za oslabljena sredstva, ki jo je Nizozemska dodelila ING, s čimer je odobrila ta ukrep ob upoštevanju zavez Nizozemske.
In Article 2 of that Decision, the Commission states in the first paragraph that the restructuring aid provided by the Netherlands to ING constitutes State aid and, in the second paragraph that the aid is compatible with the common market, subject to the commitments set out in Annex II to that Decision.
V prvem odstavku člena 2 te odločbe Komisija navaja, da pomoč za prestrukturiranje, ki jo je Nizozemska zagotovila ING, pomeni državno pomoč, v drugem odstavku pa, da je pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom ob upoštevanju zavez iz Priloge II k tej odločbi.
On 17 November 2011, the Netherlandsnotified to the Commission a request for amendment of the commitments on which the 2009 Restructuring Decision was based; the notification was registered as case SA.29832.
Nizozemska je 17. novembra 2011 Komisiji priglasila zahtevo o spremembi zavez, na katerih temelji odločba o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2009, priglasitev pa je bila evidentirana kot zadeva SA.29832.
Instead of ING divesting Westland Utrecht Bank ("WUB") as envisaged in the commitments on which the 2009 Restructuring Decision (hereafter "the WUB commitment") was based, the Netherlands proposed that ING would integrate parts of WUB with Nationale Nederlanden Bank ("NN Bank") and divest that integrated entity as part of ING Insurance Europe.
Namesto da bi ING odsvojila banko Westland Utrecht Bank (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka WUB), kot je predvideno v zavezah, na katerih temelji odločba o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zaveze banke WUB), je Nizozemska predlagala, da bi ING dele banke WUB združila z banko Nationale Nederlanden Bank (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka NN Bank) in odsvojila tak združen subjekt kot del ING Insurance Europe.
The Netherlandsalso requested an extension of a divestiture period of WUB foreseen in the 2009 Restructuring Decision.
Nizozemska je prav tako zaprosila za podaljšanje obdobja odsvojitve banke WUB, predvidenega v odločbi o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2009.
On 5 December 2011, the Commission received information from Mediobanca accusing ING Direct [5] Italia of infringing the price leadership ban to which ING was subject as a result of the commitments made by the Netherlands in the framework of the 2009 Restructuring Decision [6].
Komisija je 5. decembra 2011 prejela pritožbo banke Mediobanca, da je ING Direct Italia [5] kršila prepoved narekovanja cen, ki je veljala za ING na podlagi zavez Nizozemske v okviru odločbe o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2009 [6].
The Netherlandsand ING sought partial annulment of the 2009 Restructuring Decision in Joined Cases T-29/10 and T-33/10.
Nizozemska in ING sta v združenih zadevah T-29/10 in T-33/10 poskušali doseči delno razglasitev ničnosti odločbe o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2009.
By its judgement of 2 March 2012 [7], the General Court annulled the first and second paragraphs of Article 2 of the 2009 Restructuring Decision, and Annex II to that Decision [8].
Splošno sodišče je s sodbo z dne 2. marca 2012 [7] razglasilo ničnost prvega in drugega odstavka člena 2 odločbe o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2009 ter Priloge II k tej odločbi [8].
The Commission made its finding of compatibility on the basis of, inter alia, the commitments provided in the context of the restructuring plan of 22 October 2009 which are reproduced in the Annex to the 2012 Restructuring Decision. [11]
Ugotovitev Komisije o združljivosti je med drugim temeljila na zavezah v okviru načrta prestrukturiranja z dne 22. oktobra 2009, ki so ponovno navedene v Prilogi k sklepu o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2012 [11].
By decision of 11 May 2012 ("the Opening Decision") [12], the Commission initiated the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to investigate the three following issues:
Komisija je s sklepom z dne 11. maja 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka) [12] začela postopek, določen v členu 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, da bi proučila naslednja tri vprašanja:
whether the remuneration of the recapitalisation measure was still appropriate, given that ING had not paid coupons to the State since 2009, which triggered a re-notification for the reasons described in Recital (2);
ali je bila nadomestitev ukrepa dokapitalizacije še vedno ustrezna, kljub temu da ING državi ni plačala kuponov od leta 2009, kar je sprožilo ponovno priglasitev iz razlogov, opisanih v uvodni izjavi 0,
whether the proposed amendments of commitments, and in particular the alternative proposed by the Netherlandsas a substitute for the WUB commitment, ensure compatibility of the restructuring aid;
ali predlagane spremembe zavez in zlasti alternativna rešitev, ki jo je predlagala Nizozemska kot nadomestilo za zavezo banke WUB, zagotavljajo združljivost pomoči za prestrukturiranje ter
whether ING Direct had been pricing aggressively, in particular in Italy.
ali je ING Direct agresivno določala cene, zlasti v Italiji.
The Commission has received comments from several third parties.
Prejela je pripombe več tretjih strani.
By electronic mail of 13 June 2012, the Netherlandssent the Commission a reaction to the substance of the Opening Decision.
Nizozemska je po elektronski pošti z dne 13. junija 2012 Komisiji poslala odgovor na vsebino sklepa o začetku postopka.
In addition to information related to ING Direct and in particular to ING Direct Italia, that reaction included a document that aimed at answering the questions raised in the Opening Decision on the alternative to the WUB commitment and a request for suspension of the divestment deadline and appointment of a divestiture trustee.
V ta odgovor je bil poleg informacij v zvezi z ING Direct in zlasti ING Direct Italia vključen dokument z odgovori na vprašanja iz sklepa o začetku postopka glede alternativne rešitve za zavezo banke WUB ter zahteva za začasno odložitev roka za odsvojitev in imenovanje fiduciarja za odsvojitev.
On 15 June 2012, the Netherlandsalso proposed further commitments, including a commitment to a firm repayment schedule for the remaining CT1 securities.
Nizozemska je 15. junija 2012 tudi predlagala dodatne zaveze, vključno z zavezo k strogemu načrtu odplačil za preostale vrednostne papirje CT1.
Moreover, it indicated that it would need to amend the divestment schedule for ING Insurance [13] contained in the restructuring plan of 22 October 2009 and submitted to that end a proposal to prolong behavioural measures to which ING was subject.
Poleg tega je navedla, da bi morala spremeniti načrt odsvojitve za ING Insurance [13] iz načrta prestrukturiranja z dne 22. oktobra 2009, in je v ta namen predložila predlog o podaljšanju ukrepov ravnanja, ki so veljali za ING.
The Netherlandsconsidered that those proposals would allow the Commission to conclude that the restructuring aid was compatible with the internal market.
Nizozemska je menila, da bi na podlagi navedenih predlogov Komisija lahko sklenila, da je bila pomoč za prestrukturiranje združljiva z notranjim trgom.
On 19 June 2012, the Commission had a meeting with representatives of ING, NN Bank and the Netherlandsduring which NN Bank presented to the Commission an addendum to the business plan described in the Opening Decision [14].
Komisija se je 19. junija 2012 sestala s predstavniki ING, banke NN Bank in Nizozemsko, pri čemer je banka NN Bank Komisiji predstavila dodatek k poslovnemu načrtu, opisanem v sklepu o začetku postopka [14].
On 13 September 2012, the Netherlandsprovided a note by RBB Economics dated 11 September 2012 which responded to the Commission’s questions but did not contain further quantitative data.
Nizozemska je 13. septembra 2012 predložila dopis družbe RBB Economics z dne 11. septembra 2012, ki je vseboval odgovore na vprašanja Komisije, ni pa vseboval dodatnih kvantitativnih podatkov.
ING provided some additional data used by RBB Economics on 14 September 2012 and provided additional information during a technical meeting with the Commission on 17 September 2012.
ING je 14. septembra 2012 predložila nekatere dodatne podatke, ki jih je uporabila družba RBB Economics, na tehničnem sestanku s Komisijo 17. septembra 2012 pa je predložila dodatne informacije.
On 14 September 2012 the Netherlandssubmitted updated balance sheet projections for NN Bank (the "NN Bank business plan").
Nizozemska je 14. septembra 2012 predložila posodobljene napovedi bilance za banko NN Bank (v nadaljnjem besedilu: poslovni načrt banke NN Bank).
On 31 October 2012, the Netherlands submitted to the Commission a formal request to amend the 2012 Restructuring Decision, in particular the divestment deadlines for ING Insurance, and presented a new catalogue of commitments, which contains the requested amendment as to the Insurance divestment deadlines, modifies the previously notified request to amend the divestment deadline of WUB and modifies the initial request for an amendment described in the Opening Decision.
Nizozemska je 31. oktobra 2012 Komisiji predložila uradno zahtevo za spremembo sklepa o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2012, zlasti rokov za odsvojitev za ING Insurance, in predstavila nov katalog zavez, ki vsebuje zahtevano spremembo v zvezi z roki za odsvojitev ING Insurance, spreminja predhodno priglašeno zahtevo za spremembo roka za odsvojitev banke WUB in spreminja prvotno zahtevo za spremembo, opisano v sklepu o začetku postopka.
The Commission notes that the Netherlandsexceptionally accepts that the present decision be adopted in the English language.
Komisija ugotavlja, da se Nizozemska izjemoma strinja s sprejetjem tega sklepa v angleškem jeziku.
DESCRIPTION ING
OPIS ING
ING is composed of ING Groep N.V., a mother holding company that controls ING's banking activities via ING Bank N.V. ("ING Bank") and its insurance activities via ING Verzekeringen N.V. ("ING Insurance").
ING sestavlja družba ING Groep N.V., matična holdinška družba, ki ima nadzor nad bančnimi dejavnostmi ING prek banke ING Bank N.V. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ING Bank) in njenimi zavarovalniškimi dejavnostmi ING prek družbe ING Verzekeringen N.V. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ING Insurance).
In its segmental reporting, ING subdivides ING Bank along business lines into Retail Banking, Commercial Banking and ING Direct.
ING v poročilu o segmentih nadalje deli ING Bank po poslovnih področjih v oddelke bančnega poslovanja s prebivalstvom, komercialnega bančništva in ING Direct.
By contrast, ING Insurance uses a geographical reporting structure: Insurance Benelux (which includes ING's Dutch insurance business "Nationale Nederlanden" (also known as "NN"), Insurance Central & rest of Europe, Insurance US and Insurance Asia/Pacific).
Nasprotno pa ING Insurance uporablja zemljepisno strukturo poročanja: Insurance Benelux (ki vključuje nizozemsko zavarovalniško podjetje ING „Nationale Nederlanden“ (oziroma „NN“), Insurance Central Europe and Rest of Europe, ki je pristojna za Srednjo in preostalo Evropo,, Insurance US in Insurance Asia/Pacific).
A more detailed description of ING's business segments can be found in Recitals (20) to (37) of the 2012 Restructuring Decision.
Podrobnejši opis poslovnih segmentov ING je v uvodnih izjavah od (20) do (37) sklepa o prestrukturiranju iz leta 2012.
As a result, it also paid no coupons to the Netherlands.
Zato tudi ni plačala kuponov Nizozemski.
ING Key financial metrics 2007-2011
ključni finančni nabor ING za obdobje 2007–2011
Total income (EUR million)
Skupni prihodki (v milijonih EUR)
Net result (in EUR million)
Neto poslovni izid (v milijonih EUR)