natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For a more detailed description of Sernam’s activities, see recitals 12 to 31 of the Sernam 2 Decision and recitals 8 and 9 of the opening decision.
Za podrobnejši opis dejavnosti podjetja Sernam glej uvodne izjave od 12 do 31 odločbe Sernam 2 ter uvodni izjavi 8 in 9 odločitve o začetku postopka.
For the record: Géodis was to acquire 60 % of Sernam against payment of a symbolic EUR 1 (see recital 51 of the Sernam 1 decision).
Naj spomnimo, da bi morala družba Géodis pridobiti 60-odstotni delež družbe Sernam za simbolični 1 EUR (glej uvodno izjavo 51 odločbe Sernam 1).
No limitation of liability in limited partnerships.
V komanditnih družbah odgovornost ni omejena.
Press release dated 24 November 2004.
Obvestilo za javnost z dne 24. novembra 2004.
The contribution by Sernam SA to Sernam Xpress was made under the French legal form of ‘partial contribution of assets’.
Prenos z družbe Sernam SA na družbo Sernam Xpress je bil po francoskem pravu opredeljen kot „delni prenos sredstev“.
Letter from the French authorities dated 7 May 2008, point 77.
Dopis francoskih organov z dne 7. maja 2008, točka 77.
Case 390/98 Banks v The Coal Authority [2001] ECR I-6117.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 20. septembra 2001 v zadevi Banks (C-390/98, Recueil, str. I-6117).
Case 277/00 Germany v Commission [2004] ECR I-3925.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 2004 v zadevi Nemčija proti Komisiji (C-277/00, Recueil, str. I-3925).
Judgment Germany v Commission cited above in footnote 15.
Zgoraj v opombi 15 navedena sodba Nemčija proti Komisiji.
Case T-324/00 CDA Datenträger Albrechts v Commission [2005] ECR II-4309.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 19. oktobra 2005 v zadevi CDA Datenträger Albrechts proti Komisiji (T-324/00, ZOdl., str. II-4309).
ECJ judgment Banks, cited above in footnote 14, paragraph 78.
Zgoraj v opombi 17 navedena sodba CDA Datenträger Albrechts proti Komisiji, točka 78.
Judgment CDA Datenträger Albrechts v Commission, cited above in footnote 17, paragraph 98.
Zgoraj v opombi 17 navedena sodba CDA Datenträger Albrechts proti Komisiji, točka 98.
Judgment CDA Datenträger Albrechts v Commission, cited above in footnote 17, paragraph 99.
Zgoraj v opombi 17 navedena sodba CDA Datenträger Albrechts proti Komisiji, točka 99.
Judgment CDA Datenträger Albrechts v Commission, cited above in footnote 17, point 100.
Zgoraj v opombi 17 navedena sodba CDA Datenträger Albrechts proti Komisiji, točka 100.
Judgment Germany v Commission, cited above in footnote 15, point 70; Judgment CDA Datenträger Albrechts v Commission, cited above in footnote 17, point 73.
Zgoraj v opombi 15 navedena sodba Nemčija proti Komisiji, točka 70, in zgoraj v opombi 17 navedena sodba CDA Datenträger Albrechts proti Komisiji, točka 73.
Recital 128 of the opening decision.
Uvodna izjava 128 odločitve o začetku postopka.
Decision of 8 July 2008 concerning the measures which France has implemented in favour of the Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM), OJ L 225, 27.8.2009, p. 180.
Odločba Komisije z dne 8. julija 2008 o ukrepih, ki jih je Francija izvedla v korist Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM), UL L 225, 27.8.2009, str. 180.
Recitals 208 to 217 of the Sernam 2 Decision.
Uvodne izjave od 208 do 217 odločbe Sernam 2.
The Commission emphasises that the question of whether a contract can be termed a sale is independent of the question whether the conclusion of a contract corresponds to the conduct of a private operator.
Komisija poudarja, da vprašanje, ali je mogoče pogodbo opredeliti kot prodajo, ni povezano z vprašanjem, ali se sklenitev pogodbe ujema z ravnanjem zasebnega gospodarskega subjekta.
Judgment Germany v Commission, cited above in footnote 15.
Zgoraj v opombi 15 navedena sodba Nemčija proti Komisiji.
Judgment Germany v Commission, cited above in footnote 15, points 80 and 81.
Zgoraj v opombi 15 navedena sodba Nemčija proti Komisiji, točki 80 in 81.
Judgment Germany v Commission, cited above in footnote 15, paragraph 86.
Zgoraj v opombi 15 navedena sodba Nemčija proti Komisiji, točka 86.
Regarding the share deal, see Case 328/99 Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission, and C-399/00 [2003] ECR I-4035, paragraph 83: ‘it is correct that the sale of shares in a company which is the beneficiary of unlawful aid by a shareholder to a third party does not affect the requirement for recovery’, for the asset deal, see paragraphs 66 to 85 of the same judgment.
V zvezi z odkupom deležev glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 8. maja 2003 v zadevi Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji (C-328/99 in C-399/00, Recueil, str. I-4035, točka 83), na podlagi katere dejstvo, da eden od delničarjev proda delnice družbe, ki je prejela nezakonito pomoč, tretji osebi, ne vpliva na obveznost vračila; v zvezi z odkupom sredstev glej točke od 66 do 85 iste sodbe.
Judgment Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission, cited above in footnote 32, paragraphs 77 and 78.
Zgoraj v opombi 32 navedena sodba Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji, točki 77 in 78.
Judgment CDA Datenträger Albrechts v Commission, cited above in footnote 17.
Zgoraj v opombi 17 navedena sodba CDA Datenträger Albrechts proti Komisiji.
Cf. report of ABN Amro forwarded by the French authorities and described in section 2.5.8.2 of the opening decision, p. 47.
Glej poročilo banke ABN Amro, ki so ga predložili francoski organi in je opisano v delu 2.5.8.2 odločitve o začetku postopka, stran 47.
Judgment Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission, cited above in footnote 32, point 69.
Zgoraj v opombi 32 navedena sodba Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji, točka 69.
Recitals 72 to 74 of the opening decision.
Uvodne izjave od 72 do 74 odločitve o začetku postopka.
Recitals 75 to 77 of the opening decision.
Uvodne izjave od 75 do 77 odločitve o začetku postopka.
The figures indicated in the present decision have been rounded to the nearest million.
Zneski, navedeni v tem sklepu, so zaokroženi na milijon.
The calculation of the interest, on the other hand, must be based on the exact amount under each aid measure.
Obresti bo treba izračunati na podlagi točnega zneska posameznih pomoči.
SCS Sernam was transformed into a public limited company (Sernam SA) on 21 December 2001.
Družba SCS Sernam je bila 21. decembra 2001 preoblikovana v delniško družbo (Sernam SA).
In 2005, Sernam SA had 10 operating subsidiaries and a road transport service company, Sernam Transport Route.
Družba Sernam SA je leta 2005 vključevala 10 operativnih podružnic in eno družbo za cestne storitve, to je družbo Sernam Transport Route.
At the time of the takeover, Sernam Xpress made a current account contribution of EUR 5 million to ASTER. This amount in current account was made over to ASTER during a board meeting held in July.
Ob odkupu je na njen tekoči račun položila 5 milijonov EUR. Ta znesek na tekočem računu je bil na julijskem sestanku sveta prepuščen družbi Aster.
Financière Sernam was registered in the trade register on 14 October 2005.
Družba Financière Sernam je bila v poslovni register vpisana 14. oktobra 2005.
The various operations for the transfer of Sernam’s activities to Financière Sernam, described in detail in the recitals below, were carried out on 17 October 2005.
Različne transakcije prenosa dejavnosti družbe Sernam na družbo Financière Sernam, ki so podrobno opisane v naslednjih uvodnih izjavah, so bile izvedene 17. oktobra 2005.
Sernam SA was put into compulsory liquidation on 15 December 2005.
Družba Sernam SA je bila sodno likvidirana 15. decembra 2005.
The debts to SNCF remain amounting to EUR 38,5 million. The recovery order for EUR 41 million has been entered in the liabilities of the liquidation account.
Ostali so dolgovi do skupine SNCF v višini 38,5 milijona EUR. Nalog za vračilo 41 milijonov EUR je bil ob likvidaciji zabeležen na strani obveznosti.
Thirdly, BCP denies that Sernam Xpress had a cash surplus following the capital injections of EUR 57 million and EUR 2 million.
Tretjič, sklad BCP izpodbija trditev, da je imela družba Sernam Xpress po dokapitalizacijah v višini 57 milijonov in 2 milijona EUR presežna denarna sredstva.
BCP would have had to reinject EUR 6 million to bring the cash flow to an acceptable level given the losses to be financed.
Sklad BCP naj bi bil primoran prispevati še kapitalsko injekcijo v višini 6 milijonov EUR, da je bila ob upoštevanju izgub, ki jih je bilo treba financirati, zagotovljena še sprejemljiva najnižja raven denarnih sredstev.
In any case, the contribution of assets would have implied transfer of ownership, for which Sernam Xpress had issued a share with a nominal value of EUR 100. According to the French authorities, this share represents the price of the real value of the assets and liabilities contributed, once recapitalised to the amount of EUR 57 million.
Vsekakor naj bi prenos sredstev povzročil tudi prenos lastništva, za kar naj bi družba Sernam Xpress izdala delež z nominalno vrednostjo 100 EUR. Francoski organi menijo, da ta delnica predstavlja ceno dejanske vrednosti prenesenih sredstev in obveznosti po dokapitalizaciji v višini 57 milijonov EUR.
Once the transfer had been made, Sernam Xpress was in turn recapitalised by SNCF to the amount of EUR 2 million.
Po prenosu je skupina SNCF z 2 milijonoma EUR dokapitalizirala še družbo Sernam Xpress.
The Sernam Xpress shares were then sold to Financière Sernam for the same amount (EUR 2 million).
Nato so bile delnice družbe Sernam Xpress za enak znesek (2 milijona EUR) prodane družbi Financière Sernam.
The amount of EUR 41 million repayable to SNCF under the Sernam 2 Decision was entered in the liabilities of the liquidation account.
Znesek v višini 41 milijonov EUR, ki ga je bilo treba vrniti skupini SNCF na podlagi odločbe Sernam 2, je bil v zadevni likvidaciji zabeležen na strani obveznosti.
Therefore, it is normally this undertaking that retains the competitive advantage connected with that aid and it is therefore this undertaking that must be required to repay an amount equal to that aid. […]’
Zato običajno to podjetje ohrani konkurenčno prednost, povezano z zadevnimi pomočmi, in mu je treba naložiti vračilo zneska v višini teh pomoči […]“
In the alternative, they emphasise that the market price of Sernam Xpress would necessarily have taken into account the existence of the debt of EUR 41 million if the aid had been transferred. Under this assumption, the negative price would have been EUR 98 million (57 + 41).
Podredno še trdijo, da bi bilo treba – če bi bila pomoč prenesena – v tržni ceni družbe Sernam Xpress nujno upoštevati obstoj dolga v višini 41 milijonov EUR. Po tej predpostavki bi negativna cena znašala 98 milijonov EUR (57 + 41).
Moreover, if the position maintained by France were to be accepted, France could evade its obligation to recover from Sernam SA and from any other company which continues its economic activity the aid of EUR 41 million, declared incompatible by the Sernam 2 Decision, and the aid of EUR 503 million used improperly. Such a result would be in flagrant contradiction with the case-law of the Court of Justice, according to which the Member State is required to recover the aid without delay, using all the legal means at its disposal, including seizure of the firm’s assets and, where necessary, its liquidation if it is unable to repay the amounts in question [37].
Dalje, če bi sprejeli stališče Francije, bi to pomenilo, da se lahko ta država izogne obveznosti izterjave pomoči v višini 41 milijonov EUR – ki je bila z odločbo Sernam 2 razglašena za nezdružljivo – od družbe Sernam SA in katere koli družbe, ki nadaljuje njeno gospodarsko dejavnost, ter izterjavi zlorabljene pomoči v višini 503 milijone EUR. To bi bilo v popolnem nasprotju s sodno prakso Sodišča, po kateri se državi članici naloži takojšnja izterjava pomoči z vsemi razpoložljivimi pravnimi sredstvi, vključno z zaplembo sredstev podjetja in po potrebi uvedbo njegove likvidacije, če zadevnega zneska ne more vrniti. [37]
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical.
S 1. decembrom 2009 sta člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES postala člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 91(1) in conjunction with 218(9) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 91(1) v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Council Regulation (EC) No 2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the Agreement on the European Economic Area [1], and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2894/94 z dne 28. novembra 1994 o pravilih za izvajanje Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [1], in zlasti člena 1(3) Uredbe,
Directive 2006/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures [3] should be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.
Direktivo 2006/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o spremembi Direktive 1999/62/ES o cestnih pristojbinah za uporabo določene infrastrukture za težka tovorna vozila [3] bi bilo treba vključiti v Sporazum EGP.
It is appropriate to include in the EEA Agreement a provision allowing for an adaptation in relation to tolling arrangements on the trans-European road network in Norway.
V Sporazum EGP je primerno vključiti določbo, ki bo omogočala prilagajanje cestninskih ureditev na vseevropskem cestnem omrežju na Norveškem.
Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo XIII k Sporazumu EGP bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti
The position to be taken by the European Union in the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendment to Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement shall be based on the draft Decision of the EEA Joint Committee attached to this Decision.
Stališče Evropske unije v Skupnem odboru EGP o predlagani spremembi Priloge XIII (Promet) k Sporazumu EGP temelji na osnutku sklepa Skupnega odbora EGP, priloženega k temu sklepu.
Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,
Prilogo XIII k Sporazumu EGP bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti –
32006 L 0038: Directive 2006/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 8).’;
32006 L 0038: Direktiva 2006/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 (UL L 157, 9.6.2006, str. 8).“
The adaptation text shall be amended as follows:
Besedilo prilagoditve se spremeni:
The text of adaptation (d) is replaced by the following:
besedilo prilagoditve (d) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The following shall be added at the end of Article 7(4b):
na konec člena 7(4b) se doda naslednje:
For tolling arrangements on the trans-European road network in south-eastern Norway which are already in place on the date of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No xx/2012, the application of discounts or reductions in tolls for frequent users shall comply with Article 7(4b) of this Directive by 31 December 2014 at the latest.
Pri cestninskih ureditvah na vseevropskem cestnem omrežju v jugovzhodnem delu Norveške, ki že veljajo na dan začetka veljavnosti Sklepa Skupnega odbora EGP št. xx/2012, se uporaba popustov ali znižanj cestnin za pogoste uporabnike uskladi s členom 7(4b) te direktive najpozneje do 31. decembra 2014.
On the trans-European road network in other parts of Norway, the current level of discounts or reductions in tolls for frequent users may be applied to tolling arrangements already in place on the date of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No xx/2012 provided that the share of international heavy goods traffic on the infrastructure network concerned is below 30 %.
Na vseevropskem cestnem omrežju v drugih delih Norveške se lahko sedanja raven popustov ali znižanj za pogoste uporabnike uporablja za cestninske ureditve, ki že veljajo na dan začetka veljavnosti Sklepa Skupnega odbora EGP št. xx/2012, če je delež mednarodnega težkega tovornega prometa na zadevnem infrastrukturnem omrežju manjši od 30 %.
For tolling arrangements put in place after the date of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No xx/2012, discounts or reductions in tolls for frequent users may exceed the level set out in Article 7(4b) of this Directive provided that:
Pri cestninskih ureditvah, uvedenih po dnevu začetka veljavnosti Sklepa Skupnega odbora EGP št. xx/2012, lahko popusti ali znižanja cestnin za pogoste uporabnike presegajo raven, določeno v členu 7(4b) te direktive, če:
the level of such discounts or reductions is justified by specific circumstances, notably when the infrastructure network concerned consists of bridges and/or tunnels to replace a ferry.”.’.
raven takšnih popustov ali znižanj utemeljujejo posebne okoliščine, namreč kadar zadevno infrastrukturno omrežje sestavljajo mostovi in/ali tuneli, ki nadomestijo trajekt.‘ “
The text of adaptation (e) is deleted.
besedilo prilagoditve (e) se črta.
The text of Directive 2006/38/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.
Besedilo Direktive 2006/38/ES v islandskem in norveškem jeziku, ki se objavi v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije, je verodostojno.
This Decision shall enter into force on …, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee [2].
Ta sklep začne veljati … pod pogojem, da so bila Skupnemu odboru EGP predložena vsa uradna obvestila v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma EGP [2].
on the position to be taken by the European Union in the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms
o stališču, ki ga sprejme Evropska unija v Skupnem odboru EGP glede spremembe Protokola 31 k Sporazumu EGP o sodelovanju na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 46 and 48, in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti členov 46 in 48 v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
Protocol 31 to the Agreement on the European Economic Area [2] (the ‘EEA Agreement’) contains specific provisions and arrangements concerning cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms.
Protokol 31 k Sporazumu o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) vsebuje posebne določbe in ureditve glede sodelovanja na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode.
It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to activities outside the four freedoms, including cooperation concerning free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries.
Sodelovanje pogodbenic Sporazuma EGP je primerno razširiti na dejavnosti, za katere ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode, vključno s sodelovanjem v zvezi s prostim pretokom delavcev, koordinacijo sistemov socialne varnosti in ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na migrante, vključno z migranti iz tretjih držav.
The position to be taken by the European Union in the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement shall be based on the draft Decision of the EEA Joint Committee attached to this Decision.
Stališče Evropske unije v Skupnem odboru EGP o predlagani spremembi Protokola 31 k Sporazumu EGP temelji na osnutku sklepa Skupnega odbora EGP, priloženem temu sklepu.
DECISION No …/2012 OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
SKLEPA SKUPNEGA ODBORA EGP št. …/2012
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, (the ‘EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, kakor je bil spremenjen s Protokolom o prilagoditvi Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP), ter zlasti členov 86 in 98 Sporazuma,
Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement was amended by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No …/… of … [1].
Protokol 31 k Sporazumu EGP je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Skupnega odbora EGP št. …/… z dne … [1].
It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include cooperation concerning free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries.
Sodelovanje pogodbenic Sporazuma EGP je primerno razširiti na sodelovanje v zvezi s prostim pretokom delovne sile, uskladitvijo sistemov socialne varnosti in ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na migrante, vključno z migranti iz tretjih držav.
Budget line 04 01 04 08: “Free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries – Expenditure on administrative management”,
proračunska vrstica 04 01 04 08: ‚Prosti pretok delavcev, koordinacija sistemov socialne varnosti in ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na migrante, vključno z migranti iz tretjih držav – Odhodki za upravno poslovodenje‘,
Budget line 04 03 05: “Free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries”.’;
proračunska vrstica 04 03 05: ‚Prosti pretok delavcev, koordinacija sistemov socialne varnosti in ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na migrante, vključno z migranti iz tretjih držav‘.";
the words ‘and in the programme referred to in the twelfth indent as from 1 January 2009’ in paragraph 5 shall be replaced by ‘, in the programme referred to in the twelfth indent as from 1 January 2009 and in the actions funded from the budget lines for the financial year 2012 referred to in paragraph 12 as from 1 January 2012’;
besede "od 1. januarja 2009 pri izvajanju programa iz dvanajste alinee" v odstavku 5 se nadomestijo z "od 1. januarja 2009 pri izvajanju programa iz dvanajste alinee in od 1. januarja 2012 v dejavnostih iz odstavka 12, ki se financirajo iz proračunskih vrstic za proračunsko leto 2012";
the words ‘paragraph 8’ in paragraphs 6 and 7 shall be replaced by the words ‘paragraphs 8 and 12’.
v odstavkih 6 in 7 se besedi "odstavek 8" nadomestita z besedami "odstavka 8 in 12".
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification to the EEA Joint Committee under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement [2].
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po predložitvi zadnjega uradnega obvestila Skupnemu odboru EGP v skladu s členom 103(1) Sporazuma EGP [2].
Done at …, …
V Bruslju, …
on the position to be taken by the European Union in the EEA Joint Committee concerning an amendment to Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms
o stališču, ki ga sprejme Evropska unija v Skupnem odboru EGP glede spremembe Protokola 31 k Sporazumu EGP, o sodelovanju na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 189, in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 189 v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
The Agreement on the European Economic Area [2] (‘the EEA Agreement’) entered into force on 1 January 1994.
Sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum EGP) je začel veljati 1. januarja 1994.
Pursuant to Article 98 of the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend, among others, Protocol 31 thereto.
V skladu s členom 98 Sporazuma EGP lahko Skupni odbor EGP med drugim odloči spremeniti Protokol 31 k Sporazumu EGP.
Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement contains provisions and arrangements concerning cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms.
Protokol 31 k Sporazumu EGP vsebuje določbe in ureditve glede sodelovanja na posebnih področjih, za katera ne veljajo štiri temeljne svobode.