natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Any changes to [name of RA3] operations not requiring full re-validation will be noted on the original report by adding the information while keeping the previous information visible.
Vse spremembe operacij [ime RA3], za katere ni potrebno celotno ponovno potrjevanje, bodo navedene v prvotnem poročilu tako, da bodo dodani novi podatki, hkrati pa bodo vidni tudi prejšnji podatki.
the overall responsibility for security is assigned to anyone other than the person named in point 1.8 of Attachment 6-C2 to Regulation (EU) No 185/2010;
1. celotna odgovornost za varovanje je dodeljena komur koli, razen osebi, ki je imenovana v točki 1.8 Dodatka 6-C2 k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010;
any other changes to premises or procedures likely to significantly impact on security.
2. vse druge spremembe poslovnih prostorov ali postopkov, ki lahko bistveno vplivajo na varovanje.
[name of RA3] will inform the ACC3 and RA3’s to which it delivers secured air cargo and/or air mail if [name of RA3] ceases trading, no longer deals with air cargo/air mail or can no longer meet the requirements validated in this report.
[Ime RA3] bo obvestil ACC3 in RA3, ki jima dostavlja varovan letalski tovor in/ali letalsko pošto, če [ime RA3] preneha poslovati, se ne ukvarja več z letalskim tovorom/letalsko pošto ali ne more več izpolnjevati zahtev, ki so potrjene v tem poročilu.
[name of RA3] will maintain the security level confirmed in this report as compliant with the objective set out in the checklist and, where appropriate, implement and apply any additional security measures required to be designated RA3 where security standards were identified as insufficient, until the subsequent validation of [name of RA3] activities.
[Ime RA3] bo ohranil raven varovanja, ki je v tem poročilu potrjena kot skladna s ciljem iz kontrolnega seznama, ter po potrebi do naslednjega potrjevanja dejavnosti [ime RA3] izvajal in uporabljal vse dodatne ukrepe varovanja, ki se zahtevajo za RA3, pri katerem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so varnostni standardi nezadostni.
On behalf of [name of RA3] I accept full responsibility for this declaration.
V imenu [ime RA3] prevzemam polno odgovornost za to izjavo.
ATTACHMENT 6-H3
DODATEK 6-H3
DECLARATION OF COMMITMENTS — THIRD COUNTRY EU AVIATION SECURITY VALIDATED KNOWN CONSIGNOR (KC3)
IZJAVA O OBVEZNOSTIH – ZNANI POŠILJATELJ TRETJE DRŽAVE, POTRJEN ZA UKREPE VAROVANJA V LETALSTVU EU (KC3)
On behalf of [name of KC3] I take note of the following:
V imenu [ime KC3] upoštevam naslednje:
[Name of KC3] can only be designated ‘third country EU aviation security validated known consignor’ (KC3) once an EU aviation security validation has been successfully completed with a ‘PASS’ by an EU aviation security validator listed in the Union database for the regulated agents and known consignors.
[Ime KC3] se lahko imenuje za ‚znanega pošiljatelja iz tretje države, ki je potrjen za ukrepe varovanja v letalstvu EU‘ (KC3) šele takrat, ko je bilo potrjevanje ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU uspešno zaključeno z oznako ‚USTREZA‘, ki jo je potrdil potrjevalec ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU, naveden v bazi podatkov Unije o reguliranih agentih in znanih pošiljateljih.
If the report establishes a non-compliance in the security measures it refers to, this could lead to the withdrawal of [name of KC3] designation as a KC3 already obtained for this premise which will prevent [name of KC3] from delivering secured air cargo or mail for EU/EEA destination to an ACC3 or a third country EU aviation security validated regulated agent (RA3).
Če je v poročilu ugotovljena neskladnost pri ukrepih varovanja, na katere se sklicuje, lahko to privede do odvzema imenovanja [ime KC3] za KC3, ki je bilo že izdano za ta poslovni prostor, kar bo [ime KC3] preprečilo dostavo varovanega letalskega tovora ali pošte, namenjenih v EU/EGP, ACC3 ali reguliranemu agentu tretje države, ki je potrjen za ukrepe varovanja v letalstvu EU (RA3).
On behalf of [name of KC3] I declare that:
V imenu [ime KC3] izjavljam, da:
[name of KC3] will accept appropriate follow-up action for the purpose of monitoring the standards confirmed by the report.
[Ime KC3] bo sprejel ustrezne nadaljnje ukrepe za spremljanje standardov, ki so potrjeni v poročilu.
the overall responsibility for security is assigned to anyone other than the person named in point 1.9 of Attachment 6-C4 to Regulation (EU) No 185/2010;
1. celotna odgovornost za varovanje je dodeljena komur koli, razen osebi, ki je imenovana v točki 1.9 Dodatka 6-C4 k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010;
[name of KC3] will inform the ACC3 and the RA3’s to which it delivers secured air cargo and/or air mail if [name of KC3] ceases trading, no longer deals with air cargo/air mail or can no longer meet the requirements validated in this report.
[Ime KC3] bo obvestil ACC3 in RA3, ki jim dostavlja varovan letalski tovor in/ali letalsko pošto, če [ime KC3] preneha poslovati, se ne ukvarja več z letalskim tovorom/letalsko pošto ali ne more več izpolnjevati zahtev, ki so potrjene v tem poročilu.
[name of KC3] will maintain the security level confirmed in this report as compliant with the objective set out in the checklist and, where appropriate, implement and apply any additional security measures required to be designated KC3 where security standards were identified as insufficient, until the subsequent validation of [name of KC3] activities.
[Ime KC3] bo ohranil raven varovanja, ki je v tem poročilu potrjena kot skladna s ciljem iz kontrolnega seznama, ter po potrebi do naslednjega potrjevanja dejavnosti [ime KC3] izvajal in uporabljal vse dodatne ukrepe varovanja, ki se zahtevajo za KC3, pri katerem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so varnostni standardi nezadostni.
On behalf of [name of KC3] I accept full responsibility for this declaration.
V imenu [ime KC3] prevzemam polno odgovornost za to izjavo.
European Union Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
Države članice Evropske unije: Avstrija, Belgija, Bolgarija, Ciper, Češka, Danska, Estonija, Finska, Francija, Grčija, Hrvaška, Irska, Italija, Latvija, Litva, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Nemčija, Nizozemska, Poljska, Portugalska, Romunija, Slovaška, Slovenija, Španija, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo.
EU/EEA bound air cargo/air mail/aircraft in this validation checklist is equivalent to EU and Iceland, Norway and Switzerland bound air cargo/air mail/aircraft.’
Letalski tovor/letalska pošta/zrakoplov, ki je namenjen v EU/EGP, se v tem validacijskem kontrolnem seznamu šteje za enakovrednega letalskemu tovoru/letalski pošti/zrakoplovu, namenjenemu v EU ter na Islandijo, Norveško in v Švico.“
OJ L 324, 22.11.2012, p. 25.’
UL L 324, 22.11.2012, str. 25.“
Airports situated in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom as well as Iceland, Norway and Switzerland.
Letališča, ki so locirana v Avstriji, Belgiji, Bolgariji, na Cipru, Češkem, Danskem, v Estoniji, na Finskem, v Franciji, Grčiji, na Hrvaškem, v Italiji, na Irskem, v Latviji, Litvi, Luksemburgu, na Madžarskem, Malti, v Nemčiji, na Nizozemskem, Poljskem, Portugalskem, v Romuniji, na Slovaškem, v Sloveniji, Španiji, na Švedskem, v Združenem kraljestvu ter na Islandiji, Norveškem in v Švici.
Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 859/2011 and (EU) No 1082/2012.’
Uredba (EU) št. 185/2010, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 859/2011 in Uredbo (EU) št. 1082/2012.“
The checklist is the instrument to be used by the EU aviation security validator for assessing the level of security applied to EU/EEA bound air cargo or air mail by or under the responsibility of the entity seeking designation as a KC3.
Kontrolni seznam je instrument, ki ga uporablja potrjevalec ukrepov varovanja v letalstvu EU za ocenjevanje ravni varovanja, ki jo za letalski tovor ali letalsko pošto, namenjena v EU/EGP, uporabi ali je zanjo odgovoren subjekt, ki zaprosi za imenovanje za KC3.
The validation report shall state that the entity is designated third country EU aviation security validated known consignor (KC3).
V poročilu o potrjevanju je navedeno, da je subjekt imenovan za znanega pošiljatelja tretje države, ki je potrjen za ukrepe varovanja v letalstvu EU (KC3).
The KC3 shall be able to use the report in its business relations with any ACC3 and any RA3.
lahko to poročilo uporabi pri poslovanju s katerim koli ACC3 in katerim koli RA3.
Any changes to [name of KC3] operations not requiring full re-validation will be noted on the original report by adding the information while keeping the previous information visible. This may concern the following changes:
Vse spremembe operacij [ime KC3], za katere ni potrebno celotno ponovno potrjevanje, bodo navedene v prvotnem poročilu tako, da bodo dodani novi podatki, hkrati pa bodo vidni tudi prejšnji podatki; to se lahko nanaša na naslednje spremembe:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 655/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 655/2013
laying down common criteria for the justification of claims used in relation to cosmetic products
o določitvi skupnih meril za utemeljitev navedb, uporabljenih v zvezi s kozmetičnimi izdelki
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products [1], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 20(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1223/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. novembra 2009 o kozmetičnih izdelkih [1] ter zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 20(2) Uredbe,
End users as defined in Article 2(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 are faced with a wide diversity of claims relating to the function, content and effects of a cosmetic product.
Končni uporabniki, kot so opredeljeni v členu 2(1)(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 1223/2009, se srečujejo s številnimi navedbami v zvezi z delovanjem, vsebino in učinki kozmetičnega izdelka.
As cosmetic products play such a big part in end users’ lives, it is important to ensure that the information conveyed to them through such claims is useful, understandable and reliable, and that it enables them to take informed decisions and to choose the products that best suit their needs and expectations.
Ker so kozmetični izdelki v življenju končnih uporabnikov tako zelo pomembni, je pomembno, da so informacije, ki so jim s temi navedbami sporočene, koristne, razumljive in zanesljive, ter da jim omogočajo sprejemanje ozaveščenih odločitev in izbiro izdelkov, ki najbolje ustrezajo njihovim potrebam in pričakovanjem.
Product claims of cosmetic products serve mainly to inform end users about the characteristics and qualities of the products.
Navedbe na kozmetičnih izdelkih služijo zlasti obveščanju končnih uporabnikov o lastnostih in značilnostih izdelkov.
Common criteria should be laid down at Union level in order to justify the use of a claim made in relation to cosmetic products.
Na ravni Unije bi bilo treba določiti skupna merila, da se utemelji uporaba navedb v zvezi s kozmetičnimi izdelki.
The main objective of laying down common criteria is to guarantee a high level of protection for end users, in particular from misleading claims in relation to cosmetic products.
Glavni cilj določanja skupnih meril je zagotavljati visoko raven varstva končnih uporabnikov, zlasti pred zavajajočimi navedbami v zvezi s kozmetičnimi izdelki.
A common approach at Union level should also ensure better convergence of actions taken by the Member States’ competent authorities, and prevent distortions in the internal market.
Skupen pristop na ravni Unije bi moral zagotoviti tudi boljšo usklajenost ukrepov, ki jih sprejemajo pristojni organi držav članic, in preprečiti izkrivljanja na notranjem trgu.
Such an approach should also enhance cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) [2].
Tak pristop bi moral okrepiti tudi sodelovanje med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za varstvo potrošnikov, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov (Uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov) [2].
Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 applies to products that fall under the definition of a cosmetic product in Article 2 of this Regulation.
Člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 1223/2009 se uporablja za izdelke, ki so v členu 2 te uredbe opredeljeni kot kozmetični izdelek.
The common criteria only apply when it has been assessed that the product in question is indeed a cosmetic product.
Skupna merila se uporabljajo samo, kadar je bilo ocenjeno, da je zadevni izdelek dejansko kozmetični izdelek.
It is for the national competent authorities and national courts to decide on a case-by-case basis which regulatory framework applies.
Pristojni organi in nacionalna sodišča za vsak posamezni primer odločijo, kateri regulativni okvir se uporablja.
The common criteria should apply without prejudice to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) [3], to Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising [4], and to other applicable Union legislation.
Skupna merila bi se morala uporabljati brez poseganja v Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/29/ES z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 84/450/EGS, direktiv Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/7/ES, 98/27/ES in 2002/65/ES ter Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (Direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah) [3], v Direktivo 2006/114/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju [4] in drugo veljavno zakonodajo Unije.
A flexible approach should be taken towards communicating the messages to end users so as to take into account the social, linguistic and cultural diversity of the Union and to preserve the innovation and the competitiveness of European industry.
Pri sporočanju končnim uporabnikom bi bilo treba uporabiti prilagodljiv pristop, pri katerem bi bilo treba upoštevati družbene, jezikovne in kulturne razlike znotraj Unije ter ohraniti inovativnost in konkurenčnost evropske industrije.
Such an approach is consistent with the principles enunciated by the Court of Justice, which has pointed out on several occasions that, in order to determine whether a claim is capable of misleading the consumer, it is necessary to consider the latter’s expectations, taking account of the specific context and circumstances in which the claim is made, including social, cultural and linguistic factors [5].
Tak pristop je skladen z načeli, ki jih je izreklo Sodišče, ko je ob več priložnostih poudarilo, da je za določanje, ali navedba lahko zavaja potrošnika, treba upoštevati njegova pričakovanja, pa tudi posebne okoliščine, v katerih je navedba izrečena, vključno z družbenimi, kulturnimi in jezikovnimi dejavniki [5].
Whilst ensuring that the same principles are respected throughout the Union, the common criteria should not aim at defining and specifying the wording that can be used for cosmetic product claims.
Ob zagotavljanju, da so enaka načela spoštovana po celotni Uniji, splošna merila ne bi smela opredeljevati in natančneje določati besedila, ki se lahko uporablja za navedbe o kozmetičnih izdelkih.
In order to ensure that the common criteria for cosmetic claims apply from the same date as Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, this Regulation should apply from 11 July 2013.
Za zagotavljanje, da se splošna merila za navedbe o kozmetičnih izdelkih uporabljajo od istega dne kot Uredba (ES) št. 1223/2009, bi se ta uredba morala začeti uporabljati dne 11. julija 2013.
This Regulation shall apply to claims in the form of texts, names, trademarks, pictures and figurative or other signs that convey explicitly or implicitly product characteristics or functions in the labelling, the making available on the market and advertising of cosmetic products.
Ta uredba se uporablja za navedbe v obliki besedil, imen, blagovnih znamk, slik ter figurativnih ali drugih znakov, ki eksplicitno ali implicitno navajajo značilnosti ali delovanje izdelka pri označevanju, dostopnosti na trgu in oglaševanju kozmetičnih izdelkov.
It shall apply to any claim, irrespective of the medium or type of marketing tool used, the product functions claimed, and the target audience.
Uporablja se za vsako navedbo, ne glede na medij ali vrsto uporabljenega tržnega orodja, navedeno delovanje izdelka ter ciljno publiko.
The responsible person referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 shall ensure that the wording of the claim in relation to cosmetic products is in compliance with the common criteria set out in the Annex and is consistent with the documentation proving the effect claimed for the cosmetic product in the product information file referred to in Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.
Odgovorna oseba iz člena 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1223/2009 zagotovi, da je besedilo navedbe glede kozmetičnega izdelka skladno s skupnimi merili iz Priloge in skladno z dokumentacijo, ki dokazuje učinek, naveden za kozmetični izdelek v dokumentaciji z informacijami o izdelku iz člena 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 1223/2009.
See e.g. Case C-220/98, Estée Lauder Cosmetics vs. Lancaster [2000] ECR I-00117, paragraph 29.
Glej na primer sodbo z dne 13. januarja 2000 v zadevi C-220/98, Estée Lauder Cosmetics proti Lancaster Group GmbH (C-220/98, Recueil, str. I-00117, točka 29).
COMMON CRITERIA
SKUPNA MERILA
Claims that indicate that the product has been authorised or approved by a competent authority within the Union shall not be allowed.
Navedbe, ki nakazujejo, da je izdelek odobril pristojni organ v Uniji, niso dovoljene.
The acceptability of a claim shall be based on the perception of the average end user of a cosmetic product, who is reasonably well-informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, taking into account social, cultural and linguistic factors in the market in question.
Sprejemljivost navedbe temelji na zaznavanju kozmetičnega izdelka s strani povprečnega končnega uporabnika, ki je razumno obveščen, pozoren in pazljiv, ob upoštevanju družbenih, kulturnih in jezikovnih dejavnikov zadevnega trga.
Claims which convey the idea that a product has a specific benefit when this benefit is mere compliance with minimum legal requirements shall not be allowed.
Navedbe z opisom, da ima izdelek posebne koristi, ko gre dejansko za skladnost z minimalnimi zakonskimi zahtevami, niso dovoljene.
Truthfulness
Verodostojnost
If it is claimed on the product that it contains a specific ingredient, the ingredient shall be deliberately present.
Če je na izdelku navedeno, da vsebuje določeno sestavino, je ta dejansko prisotna.
Ingredient claims referring to the properties of a specific ingredient shall not imply that the finished product has the same properties when it does not.
Navedbe o sestavinah, ki navajajo lastnosti specifične sestavine, ne smejo navajati, da ima končni izdelek enake lastnosti, če jih nima.
Marketing communications shall not imply that expressions of opinions are verified claims unless the opinion reflects verifiable evidence.
Tržna sporočila ne nakazujejo, da so podana mnenja preverjene navedbe, razen če mnenje temelji na preverljivih dokazih.
Evidential support
Dokazno gradivo
Claims for cosmetic products, whether explicit or implicit, shall be supported by adequate and verifiable evidence regardless of the types of evidential support used to substantiate them, including where appropriate expert assessments.
Eksplicitne ali implicitne navedbe o kozmetičnih izdelkih so podprte z ustreznimi in preverljivimi dokazi, ne glede na vrste dokaznega gradiva, ki se uporablja za njihovo podporo, vključno s strokovnimi ocenami, če je primerno.
Evidence for claim substantiation shall take into account state of the art practices.
Dokazi v podporo navedbam upoštevajo najsodobnejše prakse.
Where studies are being used as evidence, they shall be relevant to the product and to the benefit claimed, shall follow well-designed, well-conducted methodologies (valid, reliable and reproducible) and shall respect ethical considerations.
Če so za dokaz uporabljene študije, so te relevantne za izdelek in njegove navedene koristi, skladne z dobro načrtovanimi in dobro izvedenimi metodologijami (veljavnimi, zanesljivimi in ponovljivimi) ter spoštujejo etična načela.
The level of evidence or substantiation shall be consistent with the type of claim being made, in particular for claims where lack of efficacy may cause a safety problem.
Količina dokazov ali podpore mora biti skladna z vrsto navedbe, zlasti za navedbe, pri katerih bi lahko pomanjkanje učinkovitosti ogrožalo varnost.
Statements of clear exaggeration which are not to be taken literally by the average end user (hyperbole) or statements of an abstract nature shall not require substantiation.
Očitno pretirane izjave, ki jih povprečen končni uporabnik ne sme razumeti dobesedno (hiperbole), ali abstraktne navedbe ne zahtevajo utemeljevanja.
A claim extrapolating (explicitly or implicitly) ingredient properties to the finished product shall be supported by adequate and verifiable evidence, such as by demonstrating the presence of the ingredient at an effective concentration.
Navedbo, ki ekstrapolira (eksplicitno ali implicitno) lastnosti sestavine na končni izdelek, podpirajo ustrezni in preverljivi dokazi, na primer dokaz prisotnosti sestavine pri učinkoviti koncentraciji.
Assessment of the acceptability of a claim shall be based on the weight of evidence of all studies, data and information available depending on the nature of the claim and the prevailing general knowledge the end users.
Ocena sprejemljivosti navedbe temelji na zanesljivosti dokazov vseh študij, razpoložljivih podatkih in informacijah glede na naravo navedbe in prevladujočem splošnem znanju končnih uporabnikov.
Honesty
Odkritost
Presentations of a product’s performance shall not go beyond the available supporting evidence.
Predstavitve učinkovitosti izdelka ne presegajo razpoložljivih dokazil.
Claims shall not attribute to the product concerned specific (i.e. unique) characteristics if similar products possess the same characteristics.
Navedbe zadevnemu izdelku ne pripisujejo posebnih (edinstvenih) značilnosti, če imajo podobni izdelki enake značilnosti.
If the action of a product is linked to specific conditions, such as use in association with other products, this shall be clearly stated.
Če je delovanje izdelka povezano s posebnimi pogoji, na primer z uporabo z drugimi izdelki, je to jasno navedeno.
Claims for cosmetic products shall be objective and shall not denigrate the competitors, nor shall they denigrate ingredients legally used.
Navedbe o kozmetičnih izdelkih so objektivne ter ne podcenjujejo konkurentov in zakonito uporabljenih sestavin.
Claims for cosmetic products shall not create confusion with the product of a competitor.
Navedbe o kozmetičnih izdelkih ne povzročajo nejasnosti v zvezi z izdelkom konkurenta.
Informed decision-making
Ozaveščeno odločanje
Claims shall be clear and understandable to the average end user.
Navedbe so jasne in razumljive povprečnemu končnemu uporabniku.