natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The article has the objective characteristics of suitcases of heading 4202, for example the moulded rigid plastic material, the hinges, the closure system, the straps, separation flap and pockets, the wheels and the fact that it is shaped and can be used as a container that opens like a typical hinged suitcase.
Izdelek ima objektivne značilnosti kovčkov iz tarifne številke 4202, na primer lito togo plastiko, zgibe, sistem zapiranja, jermene, pregrado in žepe, kolesa in dejstvo, da je oblikovan in se lahko uporablja kot zaboj, ki se odpira kot običajni kovček s šarnirjem.
These characteristics indicate that the article is to be considered as a suitcase and not a wheeled toy.
Glede na navedene značilnosti se izdelek šteje za kovček in ne igračo s kolesi.
Therefore, classification as a wheeled toy similar to pedal cars of heading 9503 is excluded.
Zato se uvrstitev kot igrača s kolesi, podobna avtomobilom na nožni pogon iz oznake 9503, izključi.
The article is therefore to be classified under CN code 42021250, as a suitcase of moulded plastic material.
Izdelek se zato uvrsti pod oznako KN 42021250 kot kovček iz lite plastike.
The photographs are purely for information.
Fotografiji sta zgolj informativni.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 401/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 401/2012
A conical shaped article (approximately 40 cm high), made by sewing 2 nonwoven triangle shaped panels of red textile material together, with an applied trim of [] white colour at the base, and a white bobble at the top.
Izdelek stožčaste oblike (približno 40 cm visok), narejen s šivanjem 2 trikotno oblikovanih ploskev iz rdečega netkanega tekstila, z obrobo [] bele barve na spodnjem delu in belim cofom na vrhu.
(headgear)
(pokrivalo)
(See photograph no. 658) [1]
(Glej fotografijo št. 658.) [1]
Classification is determined by General Rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 6505 and 65050090.
Uvrstitev opredeljujeta splošni pravili 1 in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature ter besedilo oznak KN 6505 in 65050090.
Apart from dolls' hats, other toy hats or carnival articles, hats and other headgear of all kinds, irrespective of the materials of which they are made and of their intended use, are classified in Chapter 65 (see also the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes to Chapter 65, General, first paragraph).
Poleg klobukov za punčke, drugih klobukov-igrač ali karnevalskih proizvodov se klobuki in druga pokrivala vseh vrst, ne glede na materiale, iz katerih so narejeni, in njihove predvidene uporabe, uvrščajo v poglavje 65 (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k poglavju 65, splošno, prvi odstavek).
Headgear made up from lace, felt or other textile fabric in the piece is classified within heading 6505 (see also the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes to heading 65.05, first paragraph).
Pokrivala, izdelana iz čipke, klobučevine ali drugih tekstilnih materialov, v metraži se uvrščajo pod tarifno številko 6505 (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k tarifni številki 65.05, prvi odstavek).
By virtue of Note 1(o) to Section XI (Textiles and Textile Articles), headgear of Chapter 65 is excluded from that Section.
V skladu z opombo 1(o) k oddelku XI (Tekstil in tekstilni izdelki), so pokrivala iz poglavja 65 izključena iz tega oddelka.
Textile articles that have a utilitarian function are excluded from Chapter 95, even when they have a festive design (see also the Harmonized System Explanatory Notes to heading 95.05, point (A), last paragraph).
Tekstilni izdelki, ki imajo uporabno vrednost, so izključeni iz poglavja 95, tudi če imajo praznično zasnovo (glej tudi pojasnjevalne opombe harmoniziranega sistema k tarifni številki 9505, točka (A), zadnji odstavek)).
Classification under subheading 95051090 as other articles for Christmas festivities is therefore excluded.
Uvrstitev pod tarifno podštevilko 95051090 med druge izdelke za božično praznovanje je torej izključena.
The article clearly has the characteristics of headgear and is designed to be worn as such.
Izdelek ima jasne lastnosti pokrivala in je zasnovan tako, da se nosi kot tak.
The article is therefore to be classified under CN code 65050090 as headgear.
Izdelek se zato uvrsti pod oznako KN 65050090 kot pokrivalo.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 402/2012
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 402/2012
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of aluminium radiators originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz aluminijskih radiatorjev s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
On 12 August 2011, the European Commission (the ‘Commission’) announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of aluminium radiators originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’).
(1) Evropska Komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 12. avgusta 2011 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku), napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom aluminijskih radiatorjev s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK) v Unijo.
The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged by the International Association of Aluminium Radiator Manufacturers Limited Liability Consortium (AIRAL Scrl - ‘the complainant’), representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 % of the total Union production of aluminium radiators.
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je vložil Konzorcij z omejeno odgovornostjo Mednarodnega združenja proizvajalcev aluminijskih radiatorjev (AIRAL Scrl, v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik), ki predstavlja glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje aluminijskih radiatorjev Unije.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu navedenega izdelka in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za utemeljitev začetka preiskave.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, other known Union producers, the exporting producers in the PRC, producers in the analogue country, importers, distributors, and other parties known to be concerned, and representatives of the PRC of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK, proizvajalce v primerljivi državi, uvoznike, distributerje, druge strani, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in predstavnike LRK uradno obvestila o začetku postopka.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
The complainant, other Union producers, the exporting producers in the PRC, importers and distributors made their views known.
Pritožnik, drugi proizvajalci Unije, proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK, uvozniki in distributerji so izrazili svoja stališča.
In view of the apparent high number of Union producers, importers and exporting producers sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev Unije, uvoznikov in proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and if so, to select a sample, importers and exporting producers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned (as defined in section 3 below) during the period from July 2010-June 2011.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je uvoznike in proizvajalce izvoznike pozvala, da se ji med julijem 2010 in junijem 2011 javijo in predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom (kot je opredeljen v oddelku 3 spodaj), kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku.
In order to allow exporting producers to submit a claim for market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the Chinese exporting producers known to be concerned and to the authorities of the PRC.
Da bi se proizvajalcem izvoznikom omogočila predložitev zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TGO) ali individualno obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IO), če bi tako želeli, je Komisija proizvajalcem izvoznikom iz LRK, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter organom LRK poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
Only one group of companies, Sira (Tianjin) Aluminium Products Co. Ltd and Sira Group (Tianjin) Heating Radiators Co. Ltd (the ‘Sira Group’), came forward and requested MET.
Javila se je samo skupina družb Sira (Tianjin) Aluminium Products Co. Ltd in Sira Group (Tianjin) Heating Radiators Co. Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupina Sira) in zahtevala TGO.
Requests for IT were received from Zhejiang Flyhigh Metal Products Co., Ltd. and Metal Group Co., Ltd.
Zahtevek za IO sta oddali družbi Zhejiang Flyhigh Metal Products Co., Ltd. in Metal Group Co., Ltd.
As regards the Union producers and as duly explained in recital 24 below, eight Union producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Kar zadeva proizvajalce Unije in kot je ustrezno pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 24 spodaj, je osem proizvajalcev Unije predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from the cooperating Union producers, the Commission selected a sample of four Union producers on the basis of their sales/production volume, their size and geographic location in the Union.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je Komisija prejela od sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije, je bil izbran vzorec štirih proizvajalcev Unije glede na prodajo/obseg proizvodnje, velikost in zemljepisno lego v Uniji.
As explained in recital 27 below, only three unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 27, so le trije nepovezani uvozniki predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
However two of these importers did not import/purchase the product concerned.
Vendar pa dva od teh uvoznikov nista uvažala/kupovala zadevnega izdelka.
Therefore, in view of the limited number of cooperating importers, sampling was deemed to be no longer necessary.
Zato je bilo odločeno, da vzorčenje zaradi omejenega števila uvoznikov ni več potrebno.
As explained in recital 28 below, 18 exporting producers in the PRC provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 28, je 18 proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from these parties, the Commission selected a sample of two exporting producers having the largest volume of exports to the Union.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je Komisija prejela od teh strani, je bil izbran vzorec dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov z največjim obsegom izvoza v Unijo.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all the other companies that made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation, namely to the exporting producers in the PRC, the four sampled Union producers, the cooperating importers in the Union and to the European Consumers’ Organization BEUC, with the request to send the users’ questionnaire to its associated companies.
Komisija je vsem stranem, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim družbam, ki so se javile v rokih iz obvestila o začetku, tj. proizvajalcem izvoznikom iz LRK, štirim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, sodelujočim uvoznikom v Uniji in Evropski potrošniški organizaciji BEUC, poslala vprašalnike s prošnjo, da vprašalnike za uporabnike pošljejo svojim povezanim družbam.
Replies were received from the two sampled exporting producers in the PRC, from the four sampled Union producers and one unrelated importer.
Prejela je odgovore dveh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, štirih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in enega nepovezanega uvoznika.
None of the users replied to the questionnaire.
Noben uporabnik ni izpolnil vprašalnika.
In addition, one claim for individual examination in accrodance with Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation was received from one group of related exporting producers.
Poleg tega je od ene skupine povezanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov prejela zahtevek za individualno preiskavo v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
The examination of these claims at the provisional stage would have been too burdensome to be carried out.
Preučitev teh zahtevkov bi bila v začasni fazi preveč obremenjujoča.
A decision whether individual examination will be granted to this group of companies will be taken at the definitive stage.
Odločitev o odobritvi individualne preiskave tej skupini družb bo sprejeta v zaključni fazi.
Zakopianska 72, 30-418 Krakow, Poland
Zakopianska 72, 30-418 Krakow, Poljska
Fondital S.p.A., via Cerreto 40, 25079 Vobarno, Brescia, Italy
Fondital SpA, via cerreto 40, 25079 Vobarno, Brescia, Italija
Global Srl, via Rondinera 51, 24060 Rogno, Bergamo, Italy
Global Srl, via Rondinera 51, 24060 Rogno, Bergamo, Italija
Radiatori 2000 S.p.A., via Francesca 54/A, 24040 Ciserano, Bergamo, Italy
Radiatori 2000 S.p.A, via Francesca 54/A, 24040 Ciserano, Bergamo, Italija .
Importers in the Union
Uvozniki v Uniji
Hydroland Chorobik Gawęda Malec Wojtycza Sp.j., Jawornik 658, 32-400 Myślenice, Poland
Hydroland Chorobik Gawęda Malec Wojtycza Sp.j., Jawornik 658, 32-400, Myślenice, Poljska
Exporting producers in the PRC
Proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK
Zhejiang Flyhigh Metal Products Co., Ltd. (‘Zhejiang Flyhigh’), Jinyun
Zhejiang Flyhigh Metal Products Co., Ltd. („Zhejiang flyhigh“), Jinyun,
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 (the ‘investigation period’ or the ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2010 do 30. junija 2011 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The product concerned is aluminium radiators and elements or sections of which such radiator is composed, whether or not such elements are assembled in blocks, excluding radiators and elements and sections thereof of the electrical type (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek so aluminijski radiatorji in elementi ali deli takih radiatorjev, ne glede na to, ali so ti elementi ali deli v blokih, izvzeti pa so električni radiatorji ter njihovi elementi in deli (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek).
The product concerned currently falls within CN codes, ex76151010, ex76151090, ex76169910 and ex76169990.
Zadevni izdelek se trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN ex76151010, ex76151090, ex76169910 in ex76169990.
The product definition was contested by the Sira Group based on an alleged difference between the two production processes which are used to manufacture radiators.
Na podlagi domnevne razlike med dvema proizvodnima postopkoma, ki se uporabljata pri proizvodnji radiatorjev, je tej opredelitvi izdelka ugovarjala skupina Sira.
Within the Sira Group there are two Chinese exporting producers one of which used the die-casting production technique whereas the second company used the extrusion method.
Skupino Sira sestavljata dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK, od katerih eden uporablja proizvodno tehniko tlačnega ulivanja, drugi pa tehniko ekstrudiranja.
Sira Group argued that the extrusion method should be excluded from the definition of the product concerned because of alleged differences in physical and technical characteristics, raw materials, production costs and sales prices and because the extrusion technique is uncommon in the EU and in the PRC.
Po mnenju skupine Sira bi morala biti tehnika ekstrudiranja izvzeta iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka zaradi domnevnih razlik v fizikalnih in tehničnih lastnostih, surovinah, stroških proizvodnje in prodajnih cenah ter zaradi tega, ker tehnika ekstrudiranja v EU in LRK ni običajna.
Another Chinese party, the China Chamber of Commerce for Imports and Exports of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME) requested clarification of this issue because of differences in costs and prices of radiators manufactured by the two production techniques.
Pojasnila glede tega vprašanja je zahtevala še ena kitajska stran, Kitajska gospodarska zbornica za uvoz in izvoz strojev in elektronskih izdelkov (CCCME), in sicer zaradi razlik v stroških in cenah radiatorjev, izdelanih po navedenih proizvodnih tehnikah.
In this respect, although there are minor differences it is clear that the radiators produced by both methods have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses.
Čeprav so med obema tehnikama manjše razlike, je jasno, da imajo izdelani radiatorji enake fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter uporabo.
Radiators produced by both methods are highly substitutable.
Radiatorji, izdelani po obeh metodah, so v veliki meri zamenljivi.
These basic characteristics are, primarily, lightness, low thermal inertia and high heat conductibility.
Njihove osnovne lastnosti so predvsem lahkost, nizka toplotna vztrajnost in visoka prevodnost toplote.
Differences in costs and prices and the fact that the extrusion technique may involve the use of a slightly different aluminium alloy do not change these basic characteristics.
Razlike v stroških in cenah ter dejstvo, da je pri tehniki ekstrudiranja mogoča uporaba nekoliko drugačne aluminijeve zlitine, ne spreminjajo teh osnovnih lastnosti.
In terms of price comparisons, any differences are properly accounted for in the structure of the product type comparison system employed in this investigation (‘PCN-system’) which means that only like for like comparisons would be made.
Pri primerjavi cen so razlike ustrezno obračunane v sistemu za primerjanje vrst izdelkov, uporabljenem v tej preiskavi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistem PCN), kar pomeni, da se primerjajo samo podobni izdelki.
Furthermore, aluminium radiators should be considered as one single product whatever their manufacturing process because they are sold through the same channels of sales and because end-user and consumer perception of them is that they are made of aluminium (with well-known characteristics as mentioned above) rather than any differentiation based on production method.
Poleg tega je treba aluminijske radiatorje ne glede na proizvodni proces šteti za en sam izdelek, saj se prodajajo po istih prodajnih poteh, potrošniki in končni uporabniki pa jih dojemajo kot izdelke iz aluminija (z navedenimi znanimi lastnostmi) in ne razlikujejo med proizvodnimi tehnikami.
In view of the above, this claim is therefore rejected.
Glede na navedeno se ta trditev zavrne.
CCCME also contested the fact that steel plate or even cast iron radiators are not included within the product scope.
CCCME je tudi ugovarjala dejstvu, da jeklene plošče in radiatorji iz litega železa niso vključeni v obseg izdelka.
However, although such products have similar uses, they have different basic physical and technical characteristics as the basic raw material (aluminium alloy) is replaced by steel or iron which have different physical and technical characteristics in terms of weight, thermal inertia and conductibility.
Čeprav je uporaba takih izdelkov podobna, imajo drugačne osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti, saj osnovno surovino (aluminijevo zlitino) nadomešča železo ali jeklo, ki imata drugačne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti (težo, toplotno vztrajnost in prevodnost).
This claim is therefore rejected.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
CCCME made further comments relating to references in the complaint to sales via ‘tender processes’.
CCCME je izrazila nadaljnje pripombe v zvezi s prodajo prek „javnega razpisa“, ki je navedena v pritožbi.
These comments revealed that it assumed that this concerned public procurement.
Iz teh pripomb je razvidno, da CCCME sklepa, da to zadeva javna naročila.
The tender processes referred to in the complaint, however, related to normal business practice whereby an EU purchaser of radiators asks potential suppliers to quote prices before placing orders.
Javni razpisi, navedeni v pritožbi, se v resnici nanašajo na običajno poslovno prakso, po katerih kupec radiatorjev EU pred oddajo naročila potencialne dobavitelje pozove, da objavijo cene naročila.
None of the Chinese imports used in the calculations involved a public procurement process.
Kitajskih uvoz, ki se uporablja pri izračunu, ni vključeval postopka javnih naročil.
CCCME also commented on references in the Complaint to ‘design radiators’, assuming that such radiators are excluded from the product definition.
CCCME je predložila pripombe tudi na v pritožbi navedene „oblikovalske radiatorje“, pri čemer je sklepala, da so taki radiatorji izvzeti iz opredelitve izdelka.
Again, these comments were based on a misunderstanding as the product definition does not exclude such radiators.
Tudi te pripombe temeljijo na napačnem razumevanju, saj opredelitev izdelka takih radiatorjev ne izključuje.
These comments were therefore dismissed.
Te pripombe so bile zato zavrnjene.
The investigation has shown that aluminium radiators produced in and exported from the PRC and aluminium radiators manufactured and sold in the Union by the Union producers have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses and are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo aluminijski radiatorji, izdelani v LRK in izvoženi iz LRK, in aluminijski radiatorji, ki jih v Uniji izdelujejo in prodajajo proizvajalci Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe, zato se v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za podobne.
C. SAMPLING
C. VZORČENJE
In view of the apparent large number of Union producers, sampling was provided for in the notice of initiation for the determination of injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku za ugotavljanje škode predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
This sample consisted of four companies, out of the eight Union producers that were known to produce the like product prior to the initiation of the investigation, selected on the basis of their sales volume, their size and geographic location in the Union.
Ta vzorec je vseboval štiri družbe, ki so bile na podlagi svojega obsega prodaje, velikosti in zemljepisne lege v Uniji izbrane izmed osmih proizvajalcev Unije, za katere je bilo pred začetkom preiskave znano, da proizvajajo podobne izdelke.
One interested party requested to take also production volume into consideration for the selection of the sample.
Ena zainteresirana stran je zahtevala, da se pri izbiri vzorca upošteva tudi obseg proizvodnje.
It was accepted to change the sample accordingly.
Sprejeto je bilo, da se vzorec ustrezno spremeni.
No interested party opposed to the final sample composed of four companies.
Nobena zainteresirana stran ni nasprotovala končnemu vzorcu, ki zajema štiri družbe.
In view of the potentially large number of importers involved in the proceeding, sampling was envisaged for importers in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na potencialno veliko število uvoznikov, ki jih postopek zadeva, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za uvoznike v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
Only three unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to cooperate.
Le trije nepovezani uvozniki so predložili zahtevane informacije in bili pripravljeni sodelovati.