natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The verifier shall set up and implement the verification plan such that the verification risk is reduced to an acceptable level to obtain reasonable assurance that the operator’s or aircraft operator’s report is free from material misstatements.
Preveritelj pripravi in izvaja načrt preverjanja tako, da tveganje pri preverjanju zmanjša na sprejemljivo raven ter tako zagotovi zadostno zanesljivost, da poročilo upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova ne vsebuje bistveno napačnih navedb.
The verifier shall update the risk analysis and the verification plan, and adapt the verification activities during the verification when it finds additional risks that need to be reduced or when there is less actual risk than initially expected.
Preveritelj posodobi analizo tveganja in načrt preverjanja ter prilagodi dejavnosti preverjanja, če med preverjanjem odkrije dodatna tveganja, ki jih je treba zmanjšati, ali če je dejansko tveganje manjše od prvotno pričakovanega.
Verification activities
Dejavnosti preverjanja
The verifier shall implement the verification plan and, based on the risk analysis, the verifier shall check the implementation of the monitoring plan as approved by the competent authority.
Preveritelj izvaja načrt preverjanja in na podlagi analize tveganja preveri izvajanje načrta monitoringa, kot ga je odobril pristojni organ.
To that end, the verifier shall at least carry out substantive testing consisting of analytical procedures, data verification and checking the monitoring methodology and check the following:
V ta namen preveritelj opravi vsaj obsežno preskušanje, ki vključuje analitske postopke, preverjanje podatkov in metodologije monitoringa, ter preveri:
the data flow activities and the systems used in the data flow, including information technology systems;
dejavnosti pretoka podatkov in sisteme, ki se uporabljajo v pretoku podatkov, vključno s sistemi informacijske tehnologije;
whether the control activities of the operator or aircraft operator are appropriately documented, implemented, maintained and effective to mitigate the inherent risks;
ali se nadzorne dejavnosti upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova ustrezno dokumentirajo, izvajajo in vzdržujejo ter ali so uspešne pri ublažitvi tveganj pri delovanju;
whether the procedures listed in the monitoring plan are effective to mitigate the inherent risks and control risks and whether the procedures are implemented, sufficiently documented and properly maintained.
ali so postopki iz načrta monitoringa uspešni pri ublažitvi tveganj pri delovanju in nadzornih tveganj ter ali se ti postopki izvajajo, zadostno dokumentirajo in ustrezno vzdržujejo.
For the purposes of point (a) of the second paragraph, the verifier shall track the data flow following the sequence and interaction of the data flow activities from primary source data to the compilation of the operator’s or aircraft operator’s report.
Za namene točke (a) drugega odstavka preveritelj spremlja pretok podatkov, pri čemer upošteva zaporedje in medsebojni vpliv dejavnosti pretoka podatkov od primarnega podatkovnega vira do priprave poročila upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova.
Analytical procedures
Analitski postopki
The verifier shall use analytical procedures to assess the plausibility and completeness of data where the inherent risk, the control risk and the aptness of the operator’s or aircraft operator’s control activities show the need for such analytical procedures.
Preveritelj oceni verodostojnost in popolnost podatkov z analitskimi postopki, če je to potrebno zaradi tveganja pri delovanju, nadzornega tveganja in primernosti nadzornih dejavnosti upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova.
In carrying out the analytical procedures referred to in paragraph 1, the verifier shall assess reported data to identify potential risk areas and to subsequently validate and tailor the planned verification activities.
Pri analitskih postopkih iz odstavka 1 preveritelj oceni sporočene podatke, da opredeli morebitna področja tveganja ter nato potrdi in prilagodi načrtovane dejavnosti preverjanja.
The verifier shall at least:
Preveritelj vsaj:
assess the plausibility of fluctuations and trends over time or between comparable items;
oceni verodostojnost nihanj in trendov v zadevnem času ali med primerljivimi enotami;
identify immediate outliers, unexpected data and data gaps.
opredeli neposredna odstopanja, nepričakovane podatke in podatkovne vrzeli.
In applying the analytical procedures referred to in paragraph 1, the verifier shall perform the following procedures:
Pri analitskih postopkih iz odstavka 1 preveritelj opravi naslednje postopke:
preliminary analytical procedures on aggregated data before carrying out the activities referred to in Article 14 in order to understand the nature, complexity and relevance of the reported data;
predhodne analitske postopke za skupne podatke, preden opravi dejavnosti iz člena 14, da bi razumel vrsto, kompleksnost in pomembnost sporočenih podatkov;
substantive analytical procedures on the aggregated data and the data points underlying these data for the purposes of identifying potential structural errors and immediate outliers;
vsebinske analitske postopke za skupne podatke in podatkovne točke, na katerih temeljijo ti podatki, da bi opredelil morebitne strukturne napake in neposredna odstopanja;
final analytical procedures on the aggregated data to ensure that all errors identified during the verification process have been resolved correctly.
končne analitske postopke za skupne podatke, da bi zagotovil, da so bile vse napake, ugotovljene med postopkom preverjanja, ustrezno odpravljene.
Where the verifier identifies outliers, fluctuations, trends, data gaps or data that are inconsistent with other relevant information or that differ significantly from expected amounts or ratios, the verifier shall obtain explanations from the operator or aircraft operator supported by additional relevant evidence.
Če preveritelj ugotovi, da so prisotni odstopanja, nihanja, trendi, podatkovne vrzeli ali podatki, ki niso v skladu z drugimi zadevnimi informacijami ali se bistveno razlikujejo od pričakovanih zneskov ali razmerij, mu upravljavec ali operater zrakoplova predloži pojasnila, ki jih podpre z dodatnimi dokazi.
Based on the explanations and additional evidence provided, the verifier shall assess the impact on the verification plan and the verification activities to be performed.
Na podlagi predloženih pojasnil in dodatnih dokazov preveritelj oceni učinek na načrt preverjanja in dejavnosti preverjanja, ki jih bo opravil.
The verifier shall verify the data in the operator’s or aircraft operator’s report by applying detailed testing of the data, including tracing the data back to the primary data source, cross-checking data with external data sources, performing reconciliations, checking thresholds regarding appropriate data and carrying out recalculations.
Preveritelj preveri podatke v poročilu upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova s podrobnim preskušanjem podatkov, vključno s sledenjem podatkov do primarnega podatkovnega vira, navzkrižnim preverjanjem podatkov z zunanjimi podatkovnimi viri, usklajevanjem, preverjanjem pragov v zvezi z ustreznimi podatki in opravljanjem ponovnih izračunov.
As part of the data verification referred to in paragraph 1 and taking into account the approved monitoring plan, including the procedures described in that plan, the verifier shall check:
Pri preverjanju podatkov iz odstavka 1 in ob upoštevanju odobrenega načrta monitoringa, vključno s postopki iz tega načrta, preveritelj preveri:
for the purposes of verifying an operator’s emission report, the boundaries of an installation;
meje naprave za namene preverjanja poročila upravljavca o emisijah;
for the purposes of verifying an operator’s emission report, the completeness of source streams and emission sources as described in the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority;
popolnost tokov virov in virov emisij, kot so opisani v načrtu monitoringa, ki ga je odobril pristojni organ, za namene preverjanja poročila upravljavca o emisijah;
for the purposes of verifying an aircraft operator’s emission report and tonne-kilometre report, the completeness of flights falling within an aviation activity listed in Annex I of Directive 2003/87/EC for which the aircraft operator is responsible as well as the completeness of emission data and tonne-kilometre data respectively;
popolnost letov, ki spadajo med letalske dejavnosti iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2003/87/ES, za katere je odgovoren operater zrakoplova, ter popolnost podatkov o emisijah in podatkov o tonskih kilometrih za namene preverjanja poročila operaterja zrakoplova o emisijah in poročila o tonskih kilometrih;
for the purposes of verifying an aircraft operator’s emission report and tonne-kilometre report, the consistency between reported data and mass and balance documentation;
skladnost med sporočenimi podatki ter dokumentacijo o masi in ravnotežju za namene preverjanja poročila operaterja zrakoplova o emisijah in poročila o tonskih kilometrih;
for the purposes of verifying an aircraft operator’s emission report, the consistency between aggregated fuel consumption and data on fuel purchased or otherwise supplied to the aircraft performing the aviation activity;
skladnost med podatki o skupni porabi goriva in podatki o kupljenem ali drugače dobavljenem gorivu za zrakoplov, ki opravlja letalsko dejavnost, za namene preverjanja poročila operaterja zrakoplova o emisijah;
the consistency of the aggregated reported data in an operator’s or aircraft operator’s report with primary source data;
skladnost med skupnimi sporočenimi podatki v poročilu upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova in primarnim podatkovnim virom;
where a measurement based methodology referred to in Article 21(1) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 is applied by an operator, the measured values using the results of the calculations performed by the operator in accordance with Article 46 of that Regulation;
če upravljavec uporabi metodologijo na podlagi meritev iz člena 21(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012, izmerjene vrednosti, pri čemer uporabi rezultate izračunov, ki jih je upravljavec opravil v skladu s členom 46 navedene uredbe;
the reliability and accuracy of the data.
zanesljivost in natančnost podatkov.
For the purposes of checking the completeness of flights referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2, the verifier shall use an aircraft operator’s air traffic data, including data collected from Eurocontrol or other relevant organisations which can process air traffic information such as that available to Eurocontrol.
Za preverjanje popolnosti letov iz točke (c) odstavka 2 preveritelj uporabi podatke operaterja zrakoplova o zračnem prometu, vključno s podatki, zbranimi pri Eurocontrolu ali drugih zadevnih organizacijah, ki lahko obdelujejo informacije o zračnem prometu, s katerimi razpolaga Eurocontrol.
Verification of the correct application of the monitoring methodology
Preverjanje pravilne uporabe metodologije monitoringa
The verifier shall check the correct application and implementation of the monitoring methodology as approved by the competent authority in the monitoring plan, including specific details of that monitoring methodology.
Preveritelj preveri pravilno uporabo in izvajanje metodologije monitoringa, kot jo je v načrtu monitoringa odobril pristojni organ, vključno z njenimi podrobnimi podatki.
For the purposes of verifying the operator’s emission report, the verifier shall check the correct application and implementation of the sampling plan referred to in Article 33 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, as approved by the competent authority.
Za namene preverjanja poročila upravljavca o emisijah preveritelj preveri pravilno uporabo in izvajanje načrta za vzorčenje iz člena 33 Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012, kot ga je odobril pristojni organ.
Where CO2 is transferred in accordance with Articles 48 and 49 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 and the CO2 transferred is measured by both the transferring and receiving installation, the verifier shall check whether differences between the measured values at both installations can be explained by the uncertainty of the measurement systems and whether the correct arithmetic average of the measured values has been used in the emission reports of both installations.
Če prenos CO2 poteka v skladu s členoma 48 in 49 Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012 in preneseni CO2 merita prenosna in sprejemna naprava, preveritelj preveri, ali je razlike med izmerjenimi vrednostmi obeh naprav mogoče pojasniti na podlagi negotovosti merilnih sistemov in ali je bila v poročilu o emisijah obeh naprav uporabljena pravilna aritmetična sredina.
Where the differences between the measured values at both installations cannot be explained by the uncertainty of the measurement systems, the verifier shall check whether adjustments were made to align the differences between the measured values, whether those adjustments were conservative and whether the competent authority has granted approval for those adjustments.
Če razlik med izmerjenimi vrednostmi obeh naprav ni mogoče pojasniti na podlagi negotovosti merilnih sistemov, preveritelj preveri, ali so bile uvedene prilagoditve za uskladitev razlik med izmerjenimi vrednostmi, ali so bile te prilagoditve konservativne in ali je te prilagoditve odobril pristojni organ.
Where operators are required, pursuant to Article 12(3) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, to include further elements in the monitoring plan that are relevant for meeting the requirements of Article 24(1) of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU [10], the verifier shall check the correct application and implementation of the procedures referred to in Article 12(3) of that Regulation.
Če se od upravljavcev v skladu s členom 12(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012 zahteva, da v načrt monitoringa vključijo dodatne elemente, ki so pomembni za izpolnjevanje zahtev iz člena 24(1) Sklepa Komisije 2011/278/EU [10], preveritelj preveri pravilno uporabo in izvajanje postopkov iz člena 12(3) navedene uredbe.
In doing so, the verifier shall also check whether information on any planned or actual changes to the capacity, activity level and operation of an installation have been submitted by the operator to the competent authority by 31 December of the reporting period.
Pri tem tudi preveri, ali je upravljavec pristojnemu organu do 31. decembra v poročevalnem obdobju predložil informacije o načrtovanih ali dejanskih spremembah zmogljivosti, ravni dejavnosti in obratovanja naprave.
Verification of methods applied for missing data
Preverjanje metod pri manjkajočih podatkih
Where methods laid down in the monitoring plan as approved by the competent authority have been used to complete missing data pursuant to Article 65 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, the verifier shall check whether the methods used were appropriate for the specific situation and whether they have been applied correctly.
Če so se v skladu s členom 65 Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012 za dopolnitev manjkajočih podatkov uporabile metode iz načrta monitoringa, kot ga je odobril pristojni organ, preveritelj preveri, ali so bile uporabljene metode ustrezne za zadevni primer in ali so bile pravilno uporabljene.
Where the operator or aircraft operator has obtained an approval by the competent authority to use other methods than those referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Article 65 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, the verifier shall check whether the approved approach has been applied correctly and appropriately documented.
Če pristojni organ upravljavcu ali operaterju zrakoplova odobri uporabo drugih metod poleg metod iz prvega pododstavka v skladu s členom 65 Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012, preveritelj preveri, ali je bil odobreni pristop pravilno uporabljen in ustrezno dokumentiran.
Where an operator or an aircraft operator is not able to obtain such approval in time, the verifier shall check whether the approach used by the operator or aircraft operator to complete the missing data ensures that the emissions are not underestimated and that this approach does not lead to material misstatements.
Če upravljavec ali operater zrakoplova odobritve pristopa ne more pridobiti pravočasno, preveritelj preveri, ali s pristopom, ki ga upravljavec ali operater zrakoplova uporablja za dopolnitev manjkajočih podatkov, zagotavlja, da emisije niso ocenjene prenizko, in ali zaradi tega pristopa ne prihaja do bistveno napačnih navedb.
The verifier shall check whether the control activities implemented by the operator or aircraft operator to prevent missing data referred to in Article 65(1) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 from occurring are effective.
Preveritelj preveri, ali so nadzorne dejavnosti, s katerimi upravljavec ali operater zrakoplova preprečuje nastanek manjkajočih podatkov iz člena 65(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012, učinkovite.
Uncertainty assessment
Ocena negotovosti
Where Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 requires the operator to demonstrate compliance with the uncertainty thresholds for activity data and calculation factors, the verifier shall confirm the validity of the information used to calculate the uncertainty levels as set out in the approved monitoring plan.
Če mora upravljavec v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 601/2012 za podatke o dejavnostih in faktorje za izračun dokazati skladnost s pragovi negotovosti, preveritelj potrdi veljavnost informacij, ki so se uporabile za izračun ravni negotovosti iz odobrenega načrta monitoringa.
Where an operator applies a monitoring methodology not based on tiers, as referred to in Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, the verifier shall check all of the following:
Če upravljavec uporabi metodologijo monitoringa iz člena 22 Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012, ki ne temelji na stopnjah, preveritelj preveri vse naslednje elemente:
whether an assessment and quantification of the uncertainty has been carried out by the operator demonstrating that the required overall uncertainty threshold for the annual level of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to point (c) of Article 22 of that Regulation has been met;
ali je upravljavec ocenil in količinsko opredelil negotovost ter s tem dokazal, da je izpolnjen pogoj v zvezi s splošnim pragom negotovosti za letno raven emisij toplogrednih plinov v skladu s členom 22(c) te uredbe;
the validity of the information used for the assessment and quantification of the uncertainty;
veljavnost informacij, ki so se uporabile za oceno in količinsko opredelitev negotovosti;
whether the overall approach used for the assessment and the quantification of the uncertainty is in accordance with point (b) of Article 22 of that Regulation;
ali je splošni pristop, ki se je uporabil za oceno in količinsko opredelitev negotovosti, v skladu s členom 22(b) navedene uredbe;
whether evidence is provided that the conditions for the monitoring methodology referred to in point (a) of Article 22 of that Regulation have been met.
ali so predloženi dokazi, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za metodologijo monitoringa iz člena 22(a) navedene uredbe.
Where the aircraft operator is required, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 601/2012, to demonstrate that the required uncertainty levels are not exceeded, the verifier shall check the validity of the information used to demonstrate that the applicable uncertainty levels as set out in the monitoring plan approved by the competent authority have not been exceeded.
Če mora operater zrakoplova v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 601/2012 dokazati, da zahtevane ravni negotovosti niso presežene, preveritelj preveri veljavnost informacij, s katerimi se dokazuje, da veljavne ravni negotovosti, kot so določene v odobrenem načrtu monitoringa, niso presežene.
When checking the conformance of control activities and procedures referred to in points (b) and (c) of Article 14 or when performing the checks referred to in Articles 15 and 16, the verifier may use sampling methods specific to an installation or aircraft operator provided that, based on the risk analysis, sampling is justified.
Preveritelj lahko pri preverjanju skladnosti nadzornih dejavnosti in postopkov iz člena 14(b) in (c) ali pri izvajanju pregledov iz členov 15 in 16 uporabi metode vzorčenja, ki so specifične za napravo ali operaterja zrakoplova, če je vzorčenje utemeljeno na podlagi analize tveganja.
Where the verifier identifies a non-conformity or a misstatement in the course of sampling, it shall request the operator or aircraft operator to explain the main causes of the non-conformity or the misstatement in order to assess the impact of the non-conformity or misstatement on the reported data.
Če preveritelj med vzorčenjem odkrije neskladnost ali napačno navedbo, od upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova zahteva, da pojasni glavne vzroke za neskladnost ali napačno navedbo, da lahko oceni vpliv neskladnosti ali napačne navedbe na sporočene podatke.
Based on the outcome of that assessment, the verifier shall determine whether additional verification activities are needed, whether the sampling size needs to be increased, and which part of the data population has to be corrected by the operator or aircraft operator.
Preveritelj na podlagi rezultata ocene odloči, ali so potrebne dodatne nadzorne dejavnosti, ali je treba povečati vzorec in kateri del populacije podatkov, iz katere so bili pridobljeni podatki, mora upravljavec ali operater zrakoplova popraviti.
The verifier shall document the outcome of the checks referred to in Articles 14, 15, 16 and 17, including the details of additional samples, in the internal verification documentation.
Preveritelj dokumentira rezultat pregledov iz členov 14, 15, 16 in 17 v notranji dokumentaciji o preverjanju, pri čemer vanjo vključi vse podatke o dodatnih vzorcih.
Site visits
Obiski na lokaciji
At one or more appropriate times during the verification process, the verifier shall conduct a site visit in order to assess the operation of measuring devices and monitoring systems, to conduct interviews, to carry out the activities required by this Chapter as well as to gather sufficient information and evidence enabling it to conclude whether the operator’s or aircraft operator’s report is free from material misstatements.
Preveritelj med postopkom preverjanja enkrat ali večkrat ob primernem času opravi obisk na lokaciji, da oceni delovanje merilnih naprav in sistemov monitoringa, opravi razgovore in izvede dejavnosti, ki se zahtevajo v skladu s tem poglavjem, ter zbere dovolj informacij in dokazov, da lahko ugotovi, ali poročilo upravljavca ali operaterja zrakoplova ne vsebuje bistveno napačnih navedb.
The operator or aircraft operator shall provide the verifier access to its sites.
Upravljavec ali operater zrakoplova preveritelju omogoči dostop do svojih prostorov.
For the purposes of verifying the operator’s emission report, the verifier shall also use a site visit to assess the boundaries of the installation as well as the completeness of source streams and emission sources.
Za namene preverjanja poročila upravljavca o emisijah preveritelj opravi obisk na lokaciji tudi, da pregleda meje naprave ter popolnost tokov virov in virov emisij.
For the purposes of verifying the operator’s emission report, the verifier shall decide, based on the risk analysis, whether visits to additional locations are needed, including where relevant parts of data flow activities and control activities are carried out in other locations such as company headquarters and other off-site offices.
Za namene preverjanja poročila upravljavca o emisijah preveritelj na podlagi analize tveganja odloči, ali so potrebni obiski dodatnih lokacij, tudi če se nekatere pomembne dejavnosti pretoka podatkov in nadzorne dejavnosti opravljajo na drugih lokacijah, kot so sedež družbe in drugi ločeni prostori.
Addressing misstatements and non-conformities
Obravnava napačnih navedb in neskladnosti
Where the verifier has identified misstatements or non-conformities during the verification, it shall inform the operator or aircraft operator thereof on a timely basis and request relevant corrections.
Če preveritelj med preverjanjem odkrije napačne navedbe ali neskladnosti, o njih pravočasno poroča upravljavcu ali operaterju zrakoplova ter zahteva ustrezne popravke.
The operator or aircraft operator shall correct any communicated misstatements or non-conformities.
Upravljavec ali operater zrakoplova odpravi vse sporočene napačne navedbe ali neskladnosti.