natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Is of the opinion that a swift implementation of workable FOI (Freedom of Information) laws across the Union is imperative, as is the systematic, proactive and centralised disclosure of data and documents, especially in relation to regional policy;
meni, da bi morali v celotni Uniji začeti čim prej uporabljati izvedljivo zakonodajo o svobodi obveščanja, prav tako nujno pa je sistematično, proaktivno in centralizirano razkrivanje podatkov in dokumentov, zlasti v zvezi z regionalno politiko;
Sources of errors
Viri napak
Emphasises the fact that public procurement procedures and eligibility rules are particularly prone to error;
poudarja dejstvo, da so postopki javnega naročanja in pravila o upravičenosti še posebno dovzetni za napake;
in order to comply with their obligations pursuant to Article 53b(2) of the Financial Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 to take all necessary measures to protect the Union’s financial interests when implementing the budget;
za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti v skladu s členom 53b(2) finančne uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 naj sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da bodo pri izvrševanju proračuna zaščitile finančne interese Unije;
Points to the fact that the quantification of errors could give rise to a difference of treatment:
opozarja na dejstvo, da bi lahko količinska opredelitev napak povzročila drugačno obravnavo;
notes that whereas the Court of Auditors looks at compliance, according to which rules were either adhered to or not, the Commission takes into consideration the financial impact of an error and financial corrections may vary accordingly;
ugotavlja, da medtem ko Računsko sodišče preverja skladnost, ki pokaže, ali so bila pravila upoštevana ali ne, Komisija upošteva finančni učinek napake, zato se lahko finančni popravki v skladu s tem razlikujejo;
Emphasises the fact that a complex body of rules is often at the origin of errors;
poudarja dejstvo, da je vir napak pogosto zapleten sklop pravil;
shares, therefore, the Commission’s approach to strive for simplification;
zato odobrava pristop Komisije, da si je treba prizadevati za poenostavitev;
warns against the risk which could stem from additional national regulations increasing the administrative burden (i.e. ‘gold plating’, complicated eligibility rules);
opozarja pred tveganjem, ki bi lahko izhajalo iz dodatnih nacionalnih uredb, kar bi povečalo upravno breme (t. i. „gold plating“ (čezmerno urejanje), zapletena pravila o upravičenosti);
Reporting and financial corrections
Poročanje in finančni popravki
Welcomes the Commission’s correction mechanisms which appropriately address errors and deficiencies detected over a multiannual period and at closure;
pozdravlja popravne mehanizme Komisije, ki na ustrezen način obravnavajo napake in pomanjkljivosti, odkrite v večletnem obdobju in ob zaključku poslovnih knjig;
notes that one third of ERDF programmes had payments blocked in the course of 2012 and following 121 reservations pronounced in 2011, DG REGIO has interrupted payment deadlines for 63 programmes, issued 115 warning letters and initiated suspension procedures for 60 of those programmes;
ugotavlja, da so bila leta 2012 pri eni tretjini programov Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj plačila blokirana in da je po 121 pridržkih, izraženih leta 2011, GD REGIO prekinil plačilne roke za 63 programov, izdal 115 opominov in sprožil postopke za odložitev plačil za 60 omenjenih programov;
Recalls that the financial corrections should not merely serve as a fine and that their application should have a positive impact on the long-term improvements of the management and control systems as well as on the recurrence of errors;
opozarja, da finančni popravki ne bi smeli služiti samo kot kazen in da bi morala njihova uporaba pozitivno vplivati na dolgoročne izboljšave sistemov upravljanja in nadzora ter na ponavljanje napak;
Is concerned about the findings of the Court of Auditors that there is no assurance that financial correction mechanisms compensate for all operational programmes in an adequate manner and that all material issues are resolved;
je zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da ni nobenega zagotovila, da mehanizmi finančnih popravkov dejansko na ustrezen način poravnajo vse operativne programe in da se razrešijo vse pomembne zadeve;
moreover the Court of Auditors found no evidence that financial correction mechanisms translate into lasting improvements to systems which would prevent recurrence of the errors uncovered;
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče poleg tega ni odkrilo dokazov, da mehanizmi finančnih popravkov trajno izboljšajo sisteme, kar bi preprečilo ponavljanje ugotovljenih napak;
refers in this respect specifically to the Special Report No 3/2012 [43] (points 83 and 84);
v zvezi s tem se izrecno sklicuje na posebno poročilo št. 3/2012 [43] (točki 83 in 84);
calls, therefore, on the Commission to provide a comprehensive assessment of the financial corrections made and their impact on the systems in respect of preventing the recurrence of the same errors (specifically of a systemic nature) in the future;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi celovito oceno narejenih finančnih popravkov in njihovega učinka na te sisteme v smislu preprečevanja ponavljanja istih napak (zlasti tistih sistemske narave) v prihodnosti;
calls on the Commission to inform Parliament about its conclusions by the end of 2013;
poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2013 obvesti Parlament o svojih sklepih;
invites the Commission to use all relevant findings during the next programming period 2014-2020 and to put forward proposals for amending regulations, as appropriate;
poziva jo tudi, naj v naslednjem programskem obdobju 2014–2020 uporabi vse zadevne ugotovitve in predloži predloge za spremembo uredb, kjer je to primerno;
Observes with satisfaction the continuous efforts of the Commission to reinforce and, at the same time, simplify the control provisions for cohesion policy;
z zadovoljstvom opaža nenehna prizadevanja Komisije, da bi okrepila in hkrati poenostavila določbe o kontroli kohezijske politike;
is of the opinion that the proposed measures for the 2014-2020 programming period such as specific ex-ante conditionalities, annual management declarations, certification of annual accounts, audit opinions or stricter rules for the substitution of ineligible expenditure should further contribute to the reduction of the level of error;
meni, da bi morali predlagani ukrepi za programsko obdobje 2014–2020, na primer posebna predhodna pogojnost, letne izjave o upravljanju, potrjevanje letnih računovodskih izkazov, revizijska mnenja ali strožja pravila za zamenjavo neupravičenih odhodkov, dodatno prispevati k zmanjševanju stopnje napak;
supports the growing result orientation and the thematic concentration of cohesion policy that should assure high added value of the co-financed operations;
podpira čedalje večjo usmerjenost v rezultate in tematsko osredotočenost kohezijske politike, ki bi morali zagotoviti visoko dodano vrednost sofinanciranih dejavnosti;
Calls for payments from the Structural Funds to be subject to increased conditionality monitoring so as to ensure that the rules on the proper use of Structural Funds are complied with in all Member States;
zahteva strožje preverjanje pogojevanja za plačila iz strukturnih skladov, da bi zagotovili, da se v vseh državah članicah spoštujejo pravila za pravilno uporabo strukturnih skladov;
Calls on the Commission to assist Member States in drafting comprehensive, meaningful and comparable audit control reports, including a chapter on the contributions Union funds have made in the respective countries to attain the Europe 2020 objectives, both at national and regional level, considering each region’s individual potential for development and its possible transformation in an economic growth centre;
poziva Komisijo, naj pomaga državam članicam pri oblikovanju osnutkov celovitih, smiselnih in primerljivih poročil o revizijskem nadzoru, ki vključujejo poglavje o prispevku sredstev Unije v zadevni državi za uresničitev ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 tako na nacionalni kot na regionalni ravni, če upoštevamo individualni razvojni potencial posamezne regije in možnost preobrazbe v središče gospodarske rasti;
In this context, draws the attention of the Commission and the Member States to the fact that under the Europe 2020 objectives operational programmes should increasingly be designed in such a way that its sub-objectives are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and timely and, consequently, the programme lends itself to performance audits;
s tega vidika opozarja Komisijo in države članice na dejstvo, da bi morali biti operativni programi na osnovi ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 vedno bolj zasnovani tako, da bi bili njeni podcilji točno določeni, izmerljivi, dosegljivi, pomembni in pravočasni, saj bi bil tako program primeren za revizije uspešnosti;
notes that the establishment of a common system of result and impact indicators would contribute to the evaluation of the progress achieved under the different programmes in the context of their effectiveness and efficiency and not only in terms of their financial implementation;
ugotavlja, da bi vzpostavitev skupnega sistema kazalnikov rezultatov in učinka prispevala k ocenjevanju napredka različnih programov v smislu njihove učinkovitosti in uspešnosti, ne zgolj v smislu njihovega finančnega izvajanja;
Reminds the Member States that due to the strict time limits for project execution, a mature project pipeline is required, especially for major infrastructure projects, in order to start their implementation at the beginning of the next programming period 2014-2020;
opominja države članice, da je zaradi strogih časovnih omejitev za izvajanje projektov potrebna zrela projektna zasnova, zlasti za večje infrastrukturne projekte, da jih bo mogoče začeti izvajati v začetku naslednjega programskega obdobja 2014–2020;
Shares the Court of Auditors’ view that the Commission should further reinforce the present sanction system (interruption, suspension, financial corrections) by reducing the possibility of replacing ineligible expenditure with other expenditure during the next programming period thereby creating an additional incentive for Member States to detect and correct errors at an early stage;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da bi morala Komisija dodatno okrepiti obstoječi sistem sankcij (prekinitev, odložitev, finančni popravki) z zmanjšanjem možnosti nadomestila neupravičenih odhodkov z drugimi odhodki v naslednjem programskem obdobju, kar bi zagotovilo dodatno spodbudo za države članice, da bi poskušale odkriti in popraviti napake v zgodnji fazi;
Calls on the Commission, in consultation with the Court of Auditors, to establish a transparent system which allows, on the one hand, taking into consideration annual financial corrections but also, on the other, financial corrections during the life span of a programming period;
poziva Komisijo, naj v posvetovanju z Računskim sodiščem vzpostavi pregleden sistem, ki na eni strani dopušča upoštevanje letnih finančnih popravkov, na drugi strani pa tudi finančne popravke med trajanjem programskega obdobja;
Calls on the Commission to assist Member States in rendering first-level controls and national audit authorities more effective by exchange of best practice and closer cooperation between the Commission, the Court of Auditors and national authorities (‘tripartite meetings’);
poziva Komisijo, naj pomaga državam članicam pri izboljševanju učinkovitosti kontrol prve stopnje in nacionalnih revizijskih organov z izmenjavo najboljših praks in tesnejšim sodelovanjem med Komisijo, Računskim sodiščem in nacionalnimi organi („tristranska srečanja“);
considers, in addition, that the national audit authorities could put extra emphasis on the follow-up of the achieved results and effectiveness of Union funds absorption, rather than applying only a quantitative approach, regardless of the final project goals;
prav tako meni, da bi lahko nacionalni revizijski organi večji poudarek namenili spremljanju doseženih rezultatov in učinkovitosti črpanja sredstev Unije, namesto da uporabljajo zgolj količinski pristop, ne ozirajoč se na končne cilje projekta;
Calls on the Commission to start the preparation of a ‘best practices’ manual from the current programming period, incorporating practical results, achieved effect and lessons learnt in order to optimise the absorption process and to decrease the level of error rates;
poziva Komisijo, naj začne pripravljati priročnik s primeri najboljših praks iz trenutnega programskega obdobja, vanj pa vključi praktične rezultate, dosežen učinek in ugotovitve, da bi optimizirala proces črpanja in zmanjšala stopnjo napak;
notes that in this regard, the potential future beneficiaries for the next programming period 2014-2020, including Croatia, as well as potential candidate countries, would profit;
v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da bi imeli korist morebitni prihodnji upravičenci v naslednjem programskem obdobju 2014–2020, vključno s Hrvaško, pa tudi države potencialne kandidatke;
Transport and tourism
Promet in turizem
Notes that in considering the implementation of the budget for the 2011 financial year, as in the previous year, the Court of Auditors focused mainly on cohesion and energy policies rather than on transport policy;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče glede na izvrševanje proračuna za proračunsko leto 2011 enako kot leto poprej sklenilo, da se bo namesto na prometno osredotočilo na kohezijsko in energetsko politiko;
stresses that transport policies are concerned with the development of the internal market, increased competition, innovation and the integration of transport networks;
poudarja, da je cilj prometnih politik razviti notranji trg, spodbuditi konkurenco in inovacije ter povezati prometna omrežja;
Notes that the EUR 51 million decrease in appropriations made in 2011 to the cooperation in Transport to the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking was due to the review of industrial policy approach and the decrease in payment appropriations of EUR 60 million for projects of common interests in the trans-European transport networks was made for timing reasons and to allow full use of the carryover from 2010;
ugotavlja, da je do zmanjšanja sredstev za obveznosti v letu 2011 na področju sodelovanja pri prometu za skupno podjetje Čisto nebo v višini 51 milijonov EUR prišlo zaradi pregleda pristopa industrijske politike, do zmanjšanja sredstev za plačila v višini 60 milijonov EUR za projekte v skupnem interesu vseevropskih prometnih omrežij pa zaradi izbire pravega trenutka in možnosti za uporabo vseh prenesenih sredstev iz leta 2010;
acknowledges that the reduction in cash-flow for Sesar Joint Undertaking was in line with the recommendation of the Court of Auditors;
priznava, da je zmanjšanje denarnega toka za skupno podjetje SESAR v skladu s priporočilom Računskega sodišča;
Is disappointed that following the low uptake of payment appropriations for transport safety in 2010 and the request to receive an explanation of this underspending from the Commission, no detailed information about the level of appropriations and their uptake in 2011 was provided;
je razočaran, da je Parlament po nizki izkoriščenosti sredstev za plačila za varnost v prometu v letu 2010 od Komisije zahteval obrazložitev zaradi prenizke porabe, a slednja ni posredovala podrobnejših informacij o stopnji sredstev in njihovi izkoriščenosti v letu 2011;
Notes that the characteristics of transport-related projects often leads to the concentration of a significant proportion of payments in a limited period, especially towards the end of the year and is concerned by the negative impact this can possibly have on the auditing exercise;
ugotavlja, da zaradi značilnosti s prometom povezanih projektov pogosto prihaja do zgoščevanja precejšnjega deleža plačil v omejenem obdobju, zlasti ob koncu leta, in je zaskrbljen, saj bi to utegnilo negativno vplivati na revizijo;
Notes that the Court of Auditors estimated that the most likely error rate in this spending area was 2,2 % and that the Court of Auditors’ audit indicate weaknesses in particular in the ‘first level checks’ of the expenditures, which are the responsibility of the managing authorities and intermediate bodies in the Member States;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče ocenilo najverjetnejšo stopnjo napak na tem področju porabe na 2,2 % in da njegove revizije kažejo na pomanjkljivosti zlasti pri „pregledih prve stopnje“ v zvezi z odhodki, za katere so odgovorni organi za upravljanje in posredniška telesa v državah članicah;
Notes that in 2011, the Director-General issued reservations in his annual activity report with regard to operational programmes in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Spain, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and the United Kingdom;
ugotavlja, da je generalni direktor leta 2011 v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih izrazil pridržke v zvezi z operativnimi programi v Belgiji, na Češkem, v Nemčiji, Italiji, Španiji, Latviji, Litvi, Romuniji, na Slovaškem in v Združenem kraljestvu;
Notes with satisfaction that the most likely error rate is close to the materiality threshold demonstrating that a consistent application of interruption, suspension and financial corrections has had a positive effect on the overall error rate;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je najverjetnejša stopnja napak blizu praga pomembnosti, kar kaže, da je dosledna uporaba prekinitev, odložitev in finančnih popravkov pozitivno vplivala na skupno stopnjo napak;
Is concerned about the fact that for 76 % of the regional policy transactions affected by error sufficient information was available to the Member States’ authorities to have detected and corrected at least some of the errors prior to certifying the expenditure to the Commission;
je zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, da so imeli organi držav članic pri 76 % transakcij na področju regionalne politike, na katere so vplivale napake, na voljo dovolj informacij, da bi lahko vsaj nekatere napake odkrili in popravili pred potrditvijo odhodkov Komisiji;
Emphasises that it is the task of the national audit authorities to develop the necessary ‘internal self-control’ of rules and measures in order to detect and correct errors committed at the ‘first level’;
poudarja, da je naloga nacionalnih revizijskih organov razvijati potreben notranji samonadzor pravil in ukrepov, da bi bilo mogoče odkrivati in popravljati napake, storjene na „prvi stopnji“;
Takes note of the number of reservations (24 programmes) made by the Commission’s DG ‘Employment’ (EMPL) in 2011 corresponding to EUR 57,7 million;
je seznanjen s številnimi pridržki (24 programov) GD Komisije za zaposlovanje (EMPL) iz leta 2011, ki zajemajo 57,7 milijona EUR;
notes, furthermore, that payments for 21 programmes were temporarily interrupted, valued at EUR 911 million;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da so bila plačila za 21 programov začasno prekinjena, in sicer v vrednosti 911 milijonov EUR;
welcomes the strict approach followed by the Commission, including a general rule that an accumulated residual risk of 2 % would lead to a reservation for the programme concerned;
pozdravlja strogi pristop Komisije, vključno s splošnim pravilom, da skupno preostalo tveganje 2 % privede do pridržka za zadevni program;
Welcomes the fact that for the first time in 2011, the area of Employment and Social Affairs has been sampled and appraised separately from the Cohesion Policy chapter;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bilo področje zaposlovanja in socialnih zadev leta 2011 prvič vzorčeno in ocenjeno ločeno od poglavja kohezijske politike;
welcomes the decreased error rate for this policy field, which stands at 2,2 %, compared to 3,9 % average for all policy fields;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je zmanjšala stopnja napak za to področje politike in sedaj znaša 2,2 %, medtem ko je povprečna stopnja napak za politična področja 3,9 %;
notes, however, that ineligible costs were reimbursed;
ugotavlja pa, da so bili povrnjeni neupravičeni stroški;
Recalls the need to monitor and measure the performance of financial instruments against policy goals — Europe 2020 objectives — in order to be able to identify shortcomings and to make progress;
poudarja, da je treba zaradi opredeljevanja pomanjkljivosti in doseganja napredka spremljati in meriti uspešnost finančnih instrumentov glede na cilje politik – cilje Evropa 2020;
calls for performance information and data be available on annual basis;
poziva k zagotavljanju informacij in podatkov o uspešnosti na letni ravni;
is of the opinion that in context of the current economic and financial crisis the need for multi-criteria performance data on ESF interventions is crucial;
meni, da je zaradi trenutne gospodarske in finančne krize bistvenega pomena zagotavljati podatke o uspešnosti ukrepov Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS) na podlagi več meril;
Regrets that despite reinforcements of ESF budget lines by means of transfers between budget lines and via the Amending Budget, EUR 2,7 billion of outstanding payments to the beneficiaries could not be paid due to insufficient payments appropriations;
obžaluje, da kljub povečanju sredstev v proračunskih vrsticah ESS, ki je rezultat prerazporeditev med proračunskimi vrsticami ter spremembe proračuna, zaradi nezadostnih odobritev plačil upravičencem ni bilo mogoče izplačati 2,7 milijarde EUR neporavnanih plačil;
calls on the Commission to propose, and on the Council to agree on, accurate payment appropriations in annual budgetary procedure in order to avoid uncertainty and unnecessary procedural burden on the budgetary authority and provide beneficiaries with timely payments;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga natančne odobritve plačil, ter Svet, naj se o njih dogovori med letnim proračunskim postopkom, da bi se izognili negotovosti in nepotrebnim postopkovnim bremenom za proračunski organ ter upravičencem zagotovili pravočasna plačila;
Welcomes the fact that for the ESF, an amount of EUR 3,25 million was added to the Operational Technical Assistance line in order to mobilise specific expertise and directly support the implementation of a Greek ESF Operational Programme;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil v vrstico za operativno-tehnično pomoč ESS dodan znesek 3,25 milijona EUR za uporabo specifičnega strokovnega znanja in neposredno podporo izvajanju operativnega programa ESS za Grčijo;
Stresses that the effectiveness and quality of work of ESF audit institutions needs to be improved;
poudarja, da je treba izboljšati učinkovitost in kakovost dela revizijskih organov za ESS;
Notes that the share of spending on employment strand within the Progress programme is slightly lower than the share it has in the programme;
ugotavlja, da je delež porabe za zaposlovanje v okviru programa Progress nekoliko manjši od deleža, ki ga ima v programu;
following the conclusions of the evaluation report [44] considers that spending on policy advice, research and analysis and policy debate on employment should be increased;
glede na sklepe ocenjevalnega poročila [44] meni, da je treba povečati porabo za politično svetovanje, raziskovanje, analize in razpravo o vprašanjih zaposlovanja;
Reiterates its call to ensure, in the light of implementation, an orderly progression of the total appropriations for payments in relation to the appropriations for commitments, so as to avoid any abnormal evolution of outstanding commitments (RAL) (65 % of the total volume of the Cohesion Funds at the end of 2011);
ponovno poziva, da je treba z vidika izvajanja zagotoviti nadzorovano povečevanje skupnih plačil glede na obveznosti, da ne bi prišlo do pretiranega povečanja neporavnanih obveznosti (65 % celotnega obsega kohezijskega sklada ob koncu leta 2011);
Notes that the Court of Auditors detected the reimbursement of ineligible costs in 13 % of the 180 transactions audited in the ESF and that such errors account for 77 % of all quantifiable errors and make up approximately 73 % of the estimated error rate for this policy group;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče odkrilo povračilo neupravičenih stroškov v višini 13 % pri 180 revidiranih transakcijah v Evropskem socialnem skladu in da takšne napake predstavljajo 77 % vseh količinsko opredeljivih napak in približno 73 % predvidene stopnje napak za to skupino;