natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with the Broadcasting Communication, the Commission should ensure that the State funding is proportionate to the net costs of providing the public service, but also that no market distortions occur with respect to the commercial activities which derive from the public service activities and for which no correct cost allocation is possible on the revenue side that are not necessary for the fulfilment of the public service mission.
Komisija bi morala v skladu s Sporočilom o radiodifuziji zagotoviti, da je državna denarna pomoč sorazmerna z neto stroški zagotavljanja javne službe in da na trgu ni prišlo do nobenih izkrivljanj zaradi poslovnih dejavnosti, ki izhajajo iz dejavnosti javne službe in za katere na strani dohodkov ni mogoča pravilna razporeditev stroškov, ki niso potrebni za izpolnjevanje nalog javne službe.
There would be such a distortion if RTP depressed the prices of advertising on the market so as to reduce the revenue of competitors [101].
Do takega izkrivljanja bi prišlo, če bi javna televizija RTP na trgu znižala cene za oglaševanje in s tem zmanjšala prihodke tekmecev [101].
In such a case, RTP would not maximise its commercial revenues and would unnecessarily increase the need for State funding.
V takem primeru javna televizija RTP ne bi povečala svojih prihodkov iz poslovnih dejavnosti in bi po nepotrebnem zvišala potrebo po financiranju s strani države.
According to the Broadcasting Communication, such conduct, if demonstrated, cannot be considered as intrinsic to the public service mission attributed to the broadcaster [102].
V skladu s Sporočilom o radiodifuziji tako ravnanje, če je dokazano, ne more veljati za resnično povezano s poslanstvom javne službe, ki je pripisano izvajalcu [102].
In the Decision initiating the investigation procedure of 15 November 2001, the Commission stated that, if such conduct were found to have taken place, it would take such distortions and the resulting need for higher State funding into account when assessing possible overcompensation.
V sklepu o začetku postopka preiskave z dne 15. novembra 2001 je Komisija navedla, da bi, če bi ugotovila obstoj takega ravnanja, ta izkrivljanja in posledično potrebo po večjem financiranju s strani države upoštevala pri ocenjevanju morebitnega prekomernega nadomestila.
At that stage in the procedure, the Commission noted that ‘on the basis of the information the Commission has in its possession at this moment, it cannot be established whether RTP engaged in such behaviour’ [103].
V tej fazi postopka je Komisija ugotovila, da „na podlagi informacij, ki jih trenutno ima, ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali je javna televizija RTP sodelovala pri takem ravnanju“ [103].
Following the invitation to submit comments on the initiation of procedure in this case, the Commission did not receive any observations from RTP’s competitors indicating or demonstrating that RTP was engaged in anti-competitive behaviour in commercial markets that could lead to increased state funding incompatible with the Treaty [104].
Komisija po pozivu k predložitvi pripomb glede začetka postopka v tej zadevi od konkurentov javne televizije RTP ni prejela nobenih pripomb, ki bi dokazovale, da je javna televizija RTP na komercialnih trgih ravnala protikonkurenčno, zaradi česar bi bilo potrebno povečano financiranje s strani države, nezdružljivo s Pogodbo [104].
Under the circumstances, the Commission considers that there are no indications suggesting such behaviour.
Na podlagi teh okoliščin Komisija meni, da nič ne kaže na tako ravnanje.
Consequently, it concludes that RTP does not seem to have engaged in anti-competitive behaviour in commercial markets leading to an increased need for State funding and that no overcompensation took place as a result of such behaviour.
Zato ugotavlja, da javna televizija RTP na komercialnih trgih očitno ni ravnala protikonkurenčno, zaradi česar bi bilo potrebno povečano financiranje s strani države in da zaradi takega ravnanja niso bila izvedena prekomerna nadomestila.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that the agreement with the body responsible for the social security scheme, the capital injections and the subordinated loan as well as the temporary exemption from registration charges should be regarded as State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
V skladu s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko dogovor z organom, pristojnim za shemo socialne varnosti, kapitalske injekcije in podrejeno posojilo, pa tudi začasno oprostitev plačila registracijskih taks, šteje za državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
However, the funding of RTP by means of ad hoc measures is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 106(2) TFEU.
Vendar pa je financiranje javne televizije RTP z začasnimi ukrepi združljivo z notranjim trgom v smislu člena 106(2) PDEU.
The total funding is proportionate to the net costs of clearly defined, entrusted public service obligations.
Skupno financiranje je sorazmerno z neto stroški jasno določenih naloženih obveznosti javne službe.
Therefore, the State funding did not affect trading conditions and competition in the Union to an extent which would be contrary to the interests of the Union under Article 106(2) TFEU [105].
Iz tega razloga državna denarna podpora ni vplivala na trgovinske pogoje in konkurenco v Uniji v taki meri, da bi bila v nasprotju z interesi Unije v skladu s členom 106(2) PDEU [105].
The Commission finds that Portugal has unlawfully implemented the ad hoc aids in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU [106].
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Portugalska nezakonito izvajala začasno pomoč in s tem kršila člen 108(3) PDEU [106].
This does not apply to the temporary exemption from notarial deed charges and publication fees according to Article 11(1) of Law No 21/92, as these measures are not considered to constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
To ne velja za začasno oprostitev plačila notarskih stroškov in stroškov objave v skladu s členom 11(1) Zakona št. 21/92, saj se za ta ukrepa ne šteje, da pomenita državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
As referred to in recital 143, the Commission concludes that the agreement with the body responsible for the social security in 1993, the capital injections in the period from 1994 to 1997 and the loan in 1998 constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 143, Komisija ugotavlja, da dogovor z organom, pristojnim za shemo socialne pomoči v letu 1993, kapitalske injekcije v obdobju 1994–1997 in posojilo iz leta 1998 pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
Similarly, the exemption from registration charges according to Article 11(1) of Law No 21/92 and the permanent exemption from charges in accordance with Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92 constitute State aid.
Podobno oprostitev plačila registracijskih taks v skladu s členom 11(1) Zakona št. 21/92 in trajna oprostitev plačila stroškov v skladu s členom 11(2) Zakona št. 21/92 pomenita državno pomoč.
The ad hoc measures are granted through State resources, and threaten to distort competition in the internal market by favouring RTP and have an effect on trade.
Začasni ukrepi so odobreni z državnimi sredstvi, lahko bi izkrivljali konkurenco na notranjem trgu z dajanjem prednosti RTP in vplivajo na trgovino.
The ad hoc measures do not fulfil the conditions set out in the Altmark judgment, as they may not be regarded as part of a compensation system, whose parameters have been established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner.
Začasni ukrepi ne izpolnjujejo pogojev iz sodbe v zadevi Altmark, saj jih ni mogoče šteti za del sistema nadomestil, katerega merila so bila določena predhodno na objektiven in pregleden način.
Furthermore, it is clear that RTP was not selected by means of a public tender procedure guaranteeing the lowest possible cost and there are no indications that the amount of the ad hoc payments was determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs that a typical undertaking would incur.
Poleg tega je jasno, da javna televizija RTP ni bila izbrana v skladu s postopkom javnih naročil, s katerim se zagotovi najnižja možna cena, in nič ne kaže na to, da je bil znesek začasnih plačil določen na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi jih imelo povprečno podjetje.
The exemption provided for in Article 106(2) TFEU is applicable to the ad hoc measures with the exception of the permanent exemption of RTP under Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92.
Izjema na podlagi člena 106(2) PDEU velja za začasne ukrepe, razen za trajno oprostitev za javno televizijo RTP na podlagi člena 11(2) Zakona št. 21/92.
As analysed the measures compensated clearly defined public service obligations sufficiently entrusted to RTP by Law No 21/92 and the public service contracts.
Iz zgoraj navedene analize je razvidno, da je bilo z ukrepi dodeljeno nadomestilo za jasno opredeljene obveznosti javne službe, ki so bile javni televiziji RTP v zadostni meri poverjene z Zakonom št. 21/92 in pogodbama o izvajanju javne službe.
The ad hoc measures are proportionate to the net operating public service cost of RTP.
Začasni ukrepi so sorazmerni z neto stroški poslovanja, ki jih je imela RTP pri opravljanju javne službe.
The ad hoc measures do not distort competition to an extent contrary to the Union’s interest, as the measures are proportionate to the net public service cost of RTP.
Začasni ukrepi ne izkrivljajo konkurence v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju z interesi Unije, saj so ukrepi sorazmerni z neto stroški opravljanja javne službe, ki jih je imela javna televizija RTP.
RTP also did not behave in an anti-competitive manner in commercial activities.
Javna televizija RTP pri izvajanju poslovnih dejavnosti tudi ni ravnala protikonkurenčno.
The Commission finds that the permanent exemption provided for in Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92 constitutes State aid which is not compatible with the internal market as it does not qualify as a compensation for the operation of a service of general economic interest within the meaning of Article 106(2) TFEU.
Komisija meni, da trajna oprostitev iz člena 11(2) Zakona št. 21/92 pomeni državno pomoč, ki ni združljiva z notranjim trgom, saj ni upravičena do nadomestila za izvajanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena v smislu člena 106(2) PDEU.
Therefore, Portugal should abolish that law.
Zato bi morala Portugalska ta zakon odpraviti.
Portugal should also ensure that any aid paid to RTP under that Law should be recovered from it.
Portugalska mora zagotoviti, da javna televizija RTP povrne vso pomoč, ki jo je prejela na podlagi tega zakona.
Considering the above conclusions, the Commission,
Ob upoštevanju navedenih sklepnih ugotovitev je Komisija –
The following ad hoc measures granted by Portugal in favour of Radiotelevisão Portuguesa, SA, (RTP) constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Naslednji začasni ukrepi, ki jih je Portugalska odobrila v korist Radiotelevisão Portuguesa, SA, (RTP), pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe;
the rescheduling of a debt of PTE 1206 million by Portugal to RTP in the form of an agreement with the body responsible for the social security in 1993;
odlog plačila dolga v višini 1206 milijonov PTE, ki ga je Portugalska odobrila javni televiziji RTP v obliki dogovora z organom, pristojnim za shemo socialne varnosti v letu 1993;
capital injections in the period 1994 to 1997 amounting to PTE 46800 million;
kapitalske injekcije v obdobju 1994–1997 v znesku 468000 milijonov PTE;
a loan of PTE 20000 million granted in 1998;
posojilo v višini 20000 milijonov PTE, odobreno leta 1998;
a temporary exemption from registration charges provided for in Article 11(1) of the Portuguese Law No 21/92 and amounting to PTE 11000000.
začasna oprostitev plačila registracijskih taks iz člena 11(1) portugalskega zakona št. 21/92 v višini 11000000 PTE.
The State aid measures referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article are compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 106(2) of the Treaty since they did not lead to any overcompensation of the net costs of the public service tasks entrusted to RTP.
Ukrepi državne pomoči iz odstavka 1 tega člena so združljivi z notranjim trgom v smislu člena 106(2) Pogodbe, saj niso povzročili prekomernega nadomestila neto stroškov nalog javne službe, za katere je bila pooblaščena javna televizija RTP.
The exemption from notarial deed charges and publication costs provided for in Article 11(1) of the Portuguese Law No 21/92 does not constitute State aid.
Oprostitev plačila notarskih stroškov in stroškov objave iz člena 11(1) portugalskega zakona št. 21/92 ne pomeni državne pomoči.
The unlimited exemption accorded to RTP from the payment of any charges and fees in respect of any act of inscription, registration or annotation, as provided for Article 11(2) of the Portuguese Law No 21/92, constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Neomejena oprostitev plačila vseh pristojbin in stroškov v zvezi z vpisom, registracijo ali zaznambo, ki je bila odobrena javni televiziji RTP in je določena v členu 11(2) portugalskega zakona št. 21/92, pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe.
The State aid unlawfully granted by Portugal, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty, on the basis of Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92, in favour of RTP, is incompatible with the internal market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Portugalska nezakonito izvajala s kršitvijo člena 108(3) Pogodbe na podlagi člena 11(2) Zakona št. 21/92 v korist javne televizije RTP, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
Portugal shall repeal the law referred to in Article 3(1) of this Decision and shall order recovery of any State aid received by RTP under that provision until the repeal of the law.
Portugalska odpravi zakon iz člena 3(1) tega sklepa in odredi vračilo morebitne državne pomoči, ki jo je javna televizija RTP prejela na podlagi te določbe do odprave zakona.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of RTP until their actual recovery.
Zneskom, ki jih je treba vrniti, se prištejejo obresti od datuma, ko so bili dani na voljo javni televiziji RTP, do datuma njihovega dejanskega vračila.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and to Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 in Uredbo (ES) št. 271/2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
Recovery of the aid granted under the law referred to in Article 3 shall be immediate and effective.
Vračilo pomoči, dodeljene na podlagi zakona iz člena 3, se izvede takoj in učinkovito.
Portugal shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Portugalska zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Portugal shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Portugalska v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu Komisiji predloži naslednje podatke:
a detailed description of the measures undertaken to abolish Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92;
podroben opis ukrepov, sprejetih za odpravo člena 11(2) Zakona št. 21/92;
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from RTP;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti na terjatev), ki ga je treba izterjati od javne televizije RTP;
documents demonstrating that RTP has been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da se je od javne televizije RTP zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
Portugal shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3 has been completed.
Portugalska Komisijo obvešča o napredku v zvezi s sprejetimi nacionalnimi ukrepi za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se ne opravi povračilo pomoči iz člena 3.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from RTP.
Portugalska zagotovi tudi podrobne podatke o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo pomoči, ki jih je javna televizija RTP že vrnila.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Article 88 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC) has become Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
S 1. decembrom 2009 je člen 88 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti postal člen 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Article 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Article 88 of the EC Treaty, where appropriate.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanja na člen 108 PDEU razumeti kot sklicevanja na člen 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
In the same manner, Article 86(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community has become Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Na enak način je člen 86(2) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti postal člen 106(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
OJ C 329, 24.12.2008, p. 24.
UL C 329, 24.12.2008, str. 24.
OJ L 142, 6.6.2005, p. 1.
UL L 142, 6.6.2005, str. 1.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 June 2008, in Case T-442/03, SIC v Commission [2008] ECR II-1161.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 26. junija 2008 v zadevi T-442/03, SIC proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2008, str. II-1161.
See paragraph 255 and 256 of the Judgment in Case T-442/03.
Glej točki 255 in 256 sodbe v zadevi T-442/03.
Case No E 14/05 of 22 March 2006 — Compensation payments to public service broadcaster RTP.
Zadeva št. E 14/2005 z dne 22. marca 2006 – Plačila nadomestil javnemu izdajatelju radiotelevizijskega programa RTP.
Case NN 31/06 of 4 July 2006 — Financial support to restructure the accumulated debt of the Portuguese public service broadcaster RTP (OJ C 222, 15.9.2006, p. 4).
Zadeva št. NN 31/06 z dne 4. julija 2006 – Finančna pomoč pri prestrukturiranju nakopičenega dolga portugalskega javnega izdajatelja televizijskega programa RTP (UL C 222, 15.9.2006, str. 4).
Law No 40341 of 18 October 1955 in which the Portuguese Government undertook to promote: ‘the establishment of a public limited company (…) with which it will conclude a concession contract for public service television broadcasting on Portuguese territory’.
Zakon št. 40341 z dne 18. oktobra 1955, s katerim se je portugalska vlada zavezala, da si bo prizadevala za: „ustanovitev javne delniške družbe […], s katero bo sklenila pogodbo o koncesiji za javno službo radiotelevizije na portugalskem ozemlju“.
Points 11.4 and 11.5 of Cabinet Resolution No 49/90 of 31 December 1990 and point 3 of Cabinet Resolution No 6/92 of 22 February 1992.
Točki 11.4 in 11.5 sklepa Sveta ministrov št. 49/90 z dne 31. decembra 1990 in točka 3 sklepa Sveta ministrov št. 6/92 z dne 22. februarja 1992.
The Annex to Law No 21/92 on the Statutes of RTP provides in Article 3(2) thereof that RTP may perform the following commercial activities: (i) television advertising; (ii) marketing of products (namely of programmes and publications related to their activities); (iii) providing technical consultancy and professional training and cooperation with other national and foreign bodies; (iv) marketing and rental of television equipment, films, magnetic tapes, videocassettes and similar products; (v) take interests in additional company groups and European economic interest groups as well as hold shares or quotas in other companies, under any of the forms foreseen under commercial legislation.
Priloga k Zakonu št. 21/92 o statutu javne televizije RTP v členu 3(2) določa, da lahko RTP izvaja naslednje komercialne dejavnosti: (i) televizijsko oglaševanje; (ii) trženje izdelkov (predvsem programov in objav v zvezi z njenimi dejavnostmi); (iii) nudenje tehničnega svetovanja, poklicnega usposabljanja in strokovnega sodelovanja z drugimi nacionalnimi in tujimi družbami; (iv) trženje in najem televizijske opreme, filmov, magnetofonskih trakov, videokaset in podobnih izdelkov; (v) udeležbo v dodatnih skupinah družb in evropskih gospodarskih interesnih skupinah, pa tudi v kapitalu drugih družb, v kateri koli obliki, ki jo omogoča gospodarska zakonodaja.
This Decision contains no further description of the measures, which were not been annulled b y the Court in Case T-442/03.
Ta sklep ne vsebuje nobenega dodatnega opisa ukrepov, ki jih Sodišče v zadevi T-442/2003 ni razveljavilo.
See recital 11 of this Decision.
Glej uvodno izjavo 11 tega sklepa.
EUR 1 = 200,482 PTE, fixed exchange rate at the time when Portugal adopted the euro (OJ L 359, 31.12.1998, p. 1).
1 EUR = 200,482 PTE, nespremenljivi devizni tečaj v času, ko je Portugalska uvedla euro (UL L 359, 31.12.1998, str. 1).
According to Article 5 of Law No 21/92: ‘Performance of the public service obligations entrusted to RTP SA […] shall confer on that company the right to a compensation payment the exact amount of which will correspond to the actual cost of providing the public service, which shall be determined on the basis of objectively quantifiable criteria and in accordance with the principle of sound management.’.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 21/92 določa: „Izvajanje obveznosti javne službe, za katero je bila pooblaščena javna televizija RTP SA […], tej družbi podeljuje pravico do nadomestila v znesku, ki natančno ustreza dejanskim stroškom zagotavljanja javne službe, določi pa se ga na osnovi objektivno merljivih meril in v skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja.“
In the Commission Decision of 4 July 2006, in State aid Case NN 31/06 (ex-CP 164/01, CP 60/03 and CP114/04) — Portugal Financial support to restructure the accumulated debt of the Portuguese public service broadcaster RTP, in footnote 25, the Commission clarified that the compensation amount in the original decision in case C 85/2001 should be EUR 26,9 million rather than EUR 30,9 million as stipulated originally in decision C 85/2001.
V sklepu Komisije z dne 4. julija 2006 v zadevi o državni pomoči NN 31/2006 (ex-CP 164/2001, CP 60/2003 in CP 114/2004) – Portugalska Finančna pomoč pri prestrukturiranju nakopičenega dolga portugalskega javnega izdajatelja televizijskega programa RTP je Komisija v opombi 25 pojasnila, da bi moral znesek nadomestila v prvotnem sklepu v zadevi C 85/2001 znašati 26,9 milijona EUR namesto 30,9 milijona EUR, kot je bilo prvotno navedeno v sklepu v zadevi C 85/2001.
As the figure of EUR 26,9 million was considered the correct amount in Decision NN 31/06, it is also be used in this Decision.
Ker se je znesek v višini 26,9 milijona EUR v Odločbi NN 31/2006 upošteval kot pravilen, se uporablja tudi v tem sklepu.
This provision has now been amended and stipulates publication on a publicly accessible internet site.
Ta določba je bila spremenjena in predpisuje objavo na javno dostopni internetni strani.
Submission Portugal 8 June 2010, paragraph 248 et seq.
Pripombe Portugalske z dne 8. junija 2010, odstavek 248 in naslednji.
Clause 14 of the old public service contract from 17 March 1993 and Clause 21 of the new public service contract from 31 December 1996 concluded between the Portuguese State and RTP, see footnote 26.
Klavzula 14 stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe z dne 17. marca 1993 in klavzula 21 nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe z dne 31. decembra 1996, sklenjene med portugalsko državo in javno televizijo RTP, glej opombo 26.
A rate of 3,54 % was applied in 1999, 4,14 % in 2000; 5,05 % in 2001; 3,62 % in 2002; and 2,95 % in 2003.
V letu 1999 se je uporabljala stopnja 3,54 %, v letu 2000 stopnja 4,14 %, v letu 2001 stopnja 5,05 %, v letu 2002 stopnja 3,62 % in v letu 2003 stopnja 2,95 %.
Short-, medium- and long-term debts to credit institutions and bonds.
Kratkoročni, srednjeročni in dolgoročni dolgovi, ki se knjižijo v dobro kreditnih ustanov in obveznic.
Law No 58/90 of 7 September 1990 on the activity of television broadcasting.
Zakon št. 58/90 z dne 7. septembra 1990 glede razširjanja televizijskih programov.
On 17 March 1993, a public service contract (the old public service contract) was signed between Portugal and RTP.
Portugalska in javna televizija RTP sta 17. marca 1993 podpisali pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe (stara pogodba o izvajanju javne službe).