natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This field SHALL be present and SHALL comply with the specifications from TS 119 612 clause 5.3.11 where the policy/legal notice concerning the legal status of the scheme or legal requirements met by the scheme under the jurisdiction in which it is established and/or any constraints and conditions under which the trusted list is maintained and published SHALL be a multilingual character string (plain text) made of two parts:
To polje MORA biti vključeno in v skladu s specifikacijami iz klavzule 5.3.11 TS 119 612, glede na katere JE obvestilo o politiki sheme / pravno obvestilo v zvezi s pravnim statusom sheme ali pravnimi zahtevami, ki jih shema izpolnjuje za pristojnost, v kateri je shema vzpostavljena, in/ali katere kole omejitve ali pogoji, po katerih se zanesljivi seznam vzdržuje in objavlja, večjezični niz črk (golo besedilo), ki je sestavljen iz dveh delov:
A first mandatory part, common to all Member States’ Trusted Lists (with UK English as the mandatory language, and with potentially one or more national languages), indicating that the applicable legal framework is Directive 1999/93/EC and its corresponding implementation in the laws of the Member State indicated in the ‘Scheme Territory’ field.
Prvi del je obvezen in skupen vsem zanesljivim seznamom držav članic (v britanski angleščini kot obveznem jeziku in po možnosti enem ali več nacionalnih jezikih), ki navaja, da je veljavni pravni okvir Direktiva 1999/93/ES in njeno ustrezno izvajanje v zakonodajah zadevnih držav članic, navedenih v polju „Scheme Territory“.
The applicable legal framework for the present TSL implementation of the Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers for [name of the relevant Member State] is Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures and its implementation in [name of the relevant Member State] laws.
„The applicable legal framework for the present TSL implementation of the Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers for [name of the relevant Member State] is Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures and its implementation in [name of the relevant Member State] laws.“
Text in a Member State’s national language(s): [official translation(s) of the above English text].
Besedilo v nacionalnih jezikih države članice [uradni prevod za slovenski jezik]: „Veljavni pravni okvir za izvajanje tega seznama statusa varnih storitev iz zanesljivega seznama nadzorovanih/akreditiranih overiteljev za [ime zadevne države članice] je Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 1999/93/ES z dne 13. decembra 1999 o okviru Skupnosti za elektronski podpis in njeno izvajanje v zakonodaji [ime zadevne države članice].“
A second, optional, part, specific to each Trusted List (with UK English as the mandatory language, and with potentially one or more national languages), indicating references to specific applicable national legal frameworks (e.g. in particular when related to national supervision/accreditation schemes for CSPs not issuing QCs).
Drugi del je neobvezen, specifičen za vsak zanesljivi seznam (v britanski angleščini kot obveznem jeziku in po možnosti enem ali več nacionalnih jezikih), ki navaja sklice na specifične veljavne nacionalne pravne okvire (npr. zlasti če se nanašajo na nacionalne sheme nadzora/akreditacije za CSP, ki ne izdajajo QC).
CONTINUITY OF TRUSTED LISTS
NEPREKINJENA VELJAVNOST ZANESLJIVIH SEZNAMOV
Certificates to be notified to the Commission under Article 3(c) of the present Decision SHALL be issued in such a way that they:
Potrdila, ki jih je treba priglasiti Komisiji v skladu s členom 3(c) tega sklepa SE IZDAJO tako, da:
have as a minimum three months between their validity dates,
so med njihovimi datumi veljavnosti vsaj trije meseci,
are created on new key pairs as no previously used key pair are to be re-certified.
so ustvarjeni na novih parih ključev, saj se predhodno uporabljeni pari ključev ne smejo ponovno potrditi.
In case of a compromise or decommissioning of ONE of the private keys corresponding to the public key that could be used to validate the trusted list’s signature and that has been notified to the Commission and is published in the Commission’s central lists of pointers, Member States SHALL:
V primeru, da je kompromitiran ali deaktiviran EDEN od zasebnih ključev, ki ustreza javnemu ključu, ki se lahko uporabi za potrditev podpisa iz zanesljivega seznama, in ki je bil priglašen Komisiji in objavljen v Komisijinih osnovnih seznamih kazalcev, države članice:
re-issue, without any delay, a new trusted list signed with a non-compromised private key in case the published trusted list was signed with a compromised or decommissioned private key,
takoj ponovno izdajo nov zanesljivi seznam, podpisan z nekompromitiranim zasebnim ključem, če je bil objavljeni zanesljivi seznam podpisan s kompromitiranim ali deaktiviranim zasebnim ključem,
promptly notify to the Commission the new list of public key certificates corresponding to the private keys that could be used to sign the trusted list.
takoj priglasijo Komisiji nov seznam potrdil javnih ključev, ki ustrezajo zasebnim ključem, ki se lahko uporabljajo za podpisovanje zanesljivega seznama.
In case of compromise or decommissioning of ALL the private keys corresponding to the public keys that could be used to validate the trusted list’s signature and that have been notified to the Commission and are published in the Commission’s central lists of pointers, Member States SHALL:
V primeru, da so kompromitirani ali deaktivirani VSI zasebnih ključi, ki ustrezajo javnim ključem, ki se lahko uporabijo za potrditev podpisa iz zanesljivega seznama, in ki so bili priglašeni Komisiji in objavljeni v Komisijinih osnovnih seznamih kazalcev, države članice:
generate new key pairs that could be used to sign the trusted list and their corresponding public key certificates,
ustvarijo nove pare ključev, ki se lahko uporabljajo za podpis zanesljivega seznama in njihovih ustreznih potrdil javnih ključev,
re-issue, without any delay, a new trusted list signed with one of those new private keys and whose corresponding public key certificate is to be notified,
takoj ponovno izdajo nov zanesljivi seznam, podpisan z enim od navedenih novih zasebnih ključev, čigar ustrezna potrdila javnih ključev je treba priglasiti,
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HUMAN READABLE FORM OF THE TRUSTED LIST
SPECIFIKACIJE ZA BERLJIVO OBLIKO IZVAJANJA ZANESLJIVEGA SEZNAMA
The structure of the HR form SHOULD reflect the logical model described in TS 119 612,
struktura berljive oblike MORA odražati logični model, opisan v TS 119 612,
Every present field SHOULD be displayed and provide:
vsako vsebovano polje MORA biti prikazano in navajati:
The title of the field (e.g. ‘Service type identifier’),
ime polja (npr. „Service type identifier“),
The value of the field (e.g. ‘CA/QC’),
vrednost polja (npr. „CA/QC“),
The meaning (description) of the value of the field, when applicable (e.g. ‘A Certification authority issuing public key certificates.’),
pomen (opis) vrednosti polja, kadar je to primerno (npr. „CA, ki izdaja potrdila javnih ključev“),
Multiple natural languages versions as provided in the Trusted List, when applicable.
več različic naravnih jezikov, kakor so določeni v zanesljivem seznamu, kadar je to primerno,
The following fields and corresponding values of the digital certificates present in the ‘Service digital identity’ field SHOULD, as a minimum, be displayed in the HR form:
naslednja polja in ustrezne vrednosti digitalnih potrdil v polju „Service digital identity“ MORAJO biti prikazani najmanj v berljivi obliki:
Version
različica
Serial number
serijska številka
Signature algorithm
algoritem za podpis
Issuer
izdajatelj
Valid from
veljavno od
Valid to
veljavno do
Subject
predmet
CRL Distribution Points
identifikator imetnikovega ključa
Authority Key Identifier
distribucijske točke registra preklicanih potrdil
Thumbprint algorithm
uporaba ključa
Thumbprint
osnovne omejitve
The HR form SHOULD be easily printable
algoritem za razpoznavni odtis
The HR form MUST be signed by the Scheme Operator according to PAdES Signatures baseline profile [17].
razpoznavni odtis, berljiva oblika MORA biti enostavna za tiskanje,
For an AdES supported by a QC the acronym ‘AdESQC’ is used throughout the present document.
Za napredni elektronski podpis (AdES), ki temelji na kvalificiranem potrdilu, se v nadaljevanju uporablja kratica „AdESQC“.
Note that there are a number of electronic services based on simple AdES whose cross-border use would also be facilitated, provided that the supporting certification services (e.g. issuing of non-qualified certificates) are part of the supervised/accredited services covered by a Member State in the voluntary information part of their Trusted List.
Treba je opozoriti, da obstaja več elektronskih storitev, ki temeljijo na enostavnem AdES, katerih čezmejna uporaba bi bila prav tako pospešena, pod pogojem, da so podporne storitve overjanja (npr. izdajanje nekvalificiranih potrdil) del nadzorovanih/akreditiranih storitev, ki jih država članica vključi v prostovoljni del informacij v zanesljivem seznamu.
E.g. a certification service provider established in a Member State that provides a certification service that is initially supervised by the Member State (Supervisory Body), can, after a certain time, decide to pass a voluntary accreditation for the currently supervised certification service.
Npr. overitelj s sedežem v državi članici, ki zagotavlja storitve overjanja in ga na začetku nadzoruje država članica (nadzorni organ), se lahko po določenem času odloči za prostovoljno akreditacijo za trenutno nadzorovane storitve overjanja.
Refer to ETSI EN 319 412-5 (Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Profiles for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates; Part 5: Extension for Qualified Certificate profile) for the definition of such a statement.
Glej ETSI EN 319 412-5 (Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI): Profiles for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates; Del 5: Extension for Qualified Certificate profile) za opredelitev takšne izjave.
ETSI EN 319 411-2 — Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy and security requirements for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates; Part 2: Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing qualified certificates.
ETSI EN 319 411-2 – Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI): Policy and security requirements for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates; Del 2: Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing qualified certificates.
EN 319 411-2: Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy and security requirements for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates; Part 2: Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing qualified certificates.
EN 319 411-2: Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy and security requirements for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates; Del 2: Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing qualified certificates.
The last two sets of information are of critical importance for relying parties to assess the quality and security level of such supervision/accreditation systems applicable to CSPs not issuing QCs.
Zadnja dva niza informacij sta izjemno pomembna za to, da stranke ocenijo raven kakovosti in varnosti takšnih sistemov nadzora/akreditacije, ki veljajo za CSP, ki ne izdajajo QC.
Those sets of information shall be provided at Trusted List level through the use of the present ‘Scheme information URI’ (clause 5.3.7 — information being provided by Member State), ‘Scheme type/community/rules’ (clause 5.3.9 – through the use of a text common to all Member States) and ‘TSL policy/legal notice’ (clause 5.3.11 — a text common to all Member States referring to Directive 1999/93/EC, together with the ability for each Member State to add Member State specific text/references).
Ta dva sklopa informacij se zagotovita na ravni zanesljivega seznama s pomočjo trenutnih „Scheme information URI“ (klavzula 5.3.7 – informacije, ki jih zagotovi država članica), „Scheme type/community/rules“ (klavzula 5.3.9 – s pomočjo besedila, ki je enako za vse države članice) in „TSL policy/legal notice“ (klavzula 5.3.11 – besedilo, ki je enako za vse države članice s sklicevanjem na Direktivo 1999/93/ES, skupaj z možnostjo, da vsaka država članica doda besedilo/sklice, specifične za državo članico).
Additional information on national supervision/accreditation systems for CSPs not issuing QCs may be provided at service level when applicable and required (e.g. to distinguish between several quality/security levels) through the use of ‘Scheme service definition URI’ (clause 5.5.6).
Dodatne informacije o nacionalnih sistemih nadzora/akreditacije za overitelje, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, se lahko zagotovijo na ravni storitve, če je to primerno in potrebno (npr. za razlikovanje med več ravnmi kakovosti/varnosti) z uporabo „Scheme service definition URI“ (klavzula 5.5.6).
ISO 3166-1:2006: ‘Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions Part 1: Country codes’.
ISO 3166-1:2006: „Kode za predstavljanje imen držav in njihovih podrejenih enot – Del 1: Kode držav“.
ISO 19005-2:2011: Document management – Electronic document file format for long-term preservation – Part 2: Use of ISO 32000-1 (PDF/A-2)
ISO 19005-2:2011: Document management – Electronic document file format for long-term preservation – Part 2: Use of ISO 32000-1 (PDF/A-2).
ETSI TS 103 172 (March 2012) - Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); PAdES Baseline Profile
ETSI TS 103 172 (March 2012) - Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); PAdES Baseline Profile.
Additional ‘qualification’ information defined at the level of national supervision/accreditation systems for CSPs not issuing QCs may be provided at the service level when applicable and required (e.g. to distinguish between several quality/security levels) through the use of ‘additionalServiceInformation Extension’ (clause 5.5.9.4) as part of ‘Service information extensions’ (clause 5.5.9).
Dodatne informacije o „kvalifikaciji“, opredeljene na ravni nacionalnih sistemov nadzora/akreditacije za CSP, ki ne izdajajo QC, se lahko zagotovijo na ravni storitve, če je to primerno in potrebno (npr. za razlikovanje med več ravnmi kakovosti/varnosti), s pomočjo razširitve „additionalServiceInformation“ (klavzula 5.5.9.4) kot dela „Service information extension“ (klavzula 5.5.9).
“Qualifiers” to be applied to those filtered (sets of) QC’s about “qualified” status, SSCD support status and/or issuance to Legal Person, i.e.:
„kvalifikatorjev“, ki se uporabljajo za navedene filtrirane (nize) QC glede „kvalificiranega“ statusa, statusa podpore s SSCD in/ali izdaje pravnim osebam, tj.:
The Trusted List aims at:
Zanesljivi seznam mora:
allowing for a trusted validation of electronic signatures supported by those listed supervised/accredited certification services from the listed CSPs.
omogočati varno potrjevanje elektronskih podpisov, ki jih podpirajo navedene nadzorovane/akreditirane storitve overjanja s strani navedenih CSP.
The present implementation of such Trusted Lists is also to be referred to in the list of links (pointers) towards each Member State’s Trusted List, compiled by the European Commission.
Izvajanje takih zanesljivih seznamov je treba navesti v seznamu povezav (kazalcev) na vsak zanesljivi seznam države članice, ki ga sestavi Evropska komisija.
Policy/rules for the assessment of the listed services
Politika/pravila za oceno navedenih storitev
Additional information on other supervised/accredited CSPs not issuing QCs but providing services related to electronic signatures (e.g. CSP providing Time Stamping Services and issuing Time Stamp Tokens, CSP issuing non-Qualified certificates, etc.) may be included in the Trusted List at a national level on a voluntary basis.
Prostovoljno je na nacionalni ravni v zanesljivi seznam mogoče vključiti dodatne informacije o drugih nadzorovanih/akreditiranih overiteljih, ki ne izdajajo kvalificiranih potrdil, vendar zagotavljajo storitve, povezane z elektronskimi podpisi (npr. o overiteljih, ki zagotavljajo storitve časovnega žigosanja in izdajajo žetone časovnega žiga, o overiteljih, ki izdajajo nekvalificirana potrdila itd.).
Interpretation of the Trusted List
Razlaga zanesljivega seznama
The general user guidelines for electronic signature applications, services or products relying on a Trusted List according to the Annex of Commission Decision [reference to the present Decision] are as follows:
Splošne smernice za uporabo aplikacij, storitev ali proizvodov za elektronsko podpisovanje, ki temeljijo na zanesljivem seznamu v skladu s Prilogo Sklepa Komisije [sklic na ta sklep], so naslednje:
That means that the usage (or not) of the appropriate ETSI defined QcStatements (i.e. QcCompliance, QcSSCD, etc.) and/or ETSI defined QCP(+) OIDs is ensured to be in accordance with what it is claimed by the CSP issuing QCs.
To pomeni, da je uporaba (ali neuporaba) s strani ETSI opredeljenih ustreznih izjav QcStatement (tj. QcCompliance, QcSSCD, itd.) in/ali s strani ETSI opredeljenih QCP(+) OID zagotovo v skladu s podatki, ki jih navaja CSP, ki izdaja QC.
to indicate the nature of the SSCD support:
za navedbo narave podpore SSCD:
The use by CSPs issuing QCs of different standards as references, the wide degree of interpretation of those standards as well as the lack of awareness of the existence and precedence of some normative technical specifications or standards has resulted in differences in the actual content of currently issued QCs (e.g. the use or not of those QcStatements defined by ETSI) and consequently are preventing the receiving parties from simply relying on the signatory’s certificate (and associated chain/path) to assess, at least in a machine readable way, whether or not the certificate supporting an eSignature is claimed to be a QC and whether or not it is associated with an SSCD through which the eSignature has been created. Completing the ‘Service type identifier’ (‘Sti’), ‘Service name’ (‘Sn’), and ‘Service digital identity’ (‘Sdi’) fields of the service entry in the Trusted List with information provided in the ‘Service information extensions’ (‘Sie’) field allows for the full determination of a specific type of qualified certificate issued by a listed CSP certification service issuing QCs and provides information about whether or not it is supported by an SSCD (when such information is missing in the issued QC).
Ker so overitelji, ki izdajajo kvalificirana potrdila, za sklice uporabljali različne standarde, ker so bili ti standardi zelo različno tolmačeni ter ker ni bilo zadostne ozaveščenosti o obstoju in prednostnih razvrstitev nekaterih normativnih tehničnih specifikacij ali standardov, je prišlo do razlik v dejanski vsebini trenutno izdanih QC (npr. uporaba oziroma neuporaba s strani ETSI opredeljenih izjav QC), kar pa posledično strankam prejemnicam preprečuje, da bi se zanesle na potrdilo podpisnika (in povezano verigo/pot) za oceno, vsaj v strojno berljivi obliki, ali je potrdilo, ki podpira e-podpis, kvalificirano potrdilo in ali je povezano s SSCD, s katero je bil e-podpis ustvarjen.Vnašanje informacij, navedenih v polju za vnos storitev v zanesljivem seznamu „Service information extensions“ („Sie“), v polja „Service type identifier“ („Sti“), „Service name“ („Sn“) in „Service digital identity“ („Sdi“) omogoča, da se v celoti določi posebna vrsta kvalificiranega potrdila, ki ga je izdal na seznamu naveden overitelj, ki izdaja kvalificirana potrdila, in da zagotovi informacije o tem, ali je to potrdilo podprto s SSCD (če tega podatka ni v izdanem QC).
If a human readable form of the trusted list is established and published, it SHOULD be provided in the form of a Portable Document Format (PDF) document according to ISO 32000 [15] that MUST be formatted according to the profile PDF/A (ISO 19005 [16]). The content of the PDF/A based human readable form of the trusted list SHOULD comply with the following requirements:
Če je berljiva oblika zanesljivega seznama pripravljena in objavljena, MORA biti v obliki dokumenta Portable Document Format (PDF), v skladu z ISO 32000 [15], ki mora biti formatiran v skladu s profilom PDF/A (ISO 19005 [16]).Vsebina berljive oblike zanesljivega seznama, formatirane v skladu z PDF/A, MORA biti v skladu z naslednjimi zahtevami:
Key Usage Basic constraints
identifikator izdajateljevega ključa
Certificate Policies Subject Key Identifier
politika, pod katero je bilo izdano potrdilo
of 14 November 2013
z dne 14. novembra 2013
concerning the rejection of a request to cancel a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski (PGI))
o zavrnitvi vloge za preklic imena, vpisanega v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski (ZGO))
(notified under document C(2013) 7626)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 7626)
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular Article 54(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. novembra 2012 o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil [1] ter zlasti člena 54(1) Uredbe,
The first subparagraph of Article 54(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 provides that, apart from in the case of requests from the producers of the product sold under the registered name, the Commission may cancel the registration of a protected geographical indication where compliance with the conditions of the specification is not ensured or where no product has been placed on the market under the protected geographical indication for at least seven years.
Prvi pododstavek člena 54(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 določa, da lahko Komisija, razen v primeru vlog proizvajalcev proizvoda, ki se trži pod registriranim imenom, prekliče registracijo zaščitene geografske označbe, kadar upoštevanje pogojev specifikacije ni zagotovljeno ali kadar najmanj sedem let ni bil na trg dan noben proizvod v okviru zaščitene geografske označbe.
The Commission has examined the request to cancel the registration of the protected geographical indication ‘Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski’ submitted by Germany on 15 February 2013 and received on 18 February 2013.
Komisija je proučila vlogo za preklic registracije zaščitene geografske označbe „Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski“, ki jo je Nemčija poslala 15. februarja 2013 in jo je Komisija prejela 18. februarja 2013.
This cancellation request does not fall into either of the two cases referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 54(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 and does not therefore meet the conditions laid down in that Article.
Ta vloga za preklic ne spada v nobenega od primerov iz prvega pododstavka člena 54(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 in torej ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz tega člena.
In view of these elements, the request to cancel the protected geographical indication ‘Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski’ submitted by Germany must be rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je treba vlogo Nemčije za preklic zaščitene geografske označbe „Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski“ zavrniti.
The request to cancel the protected geographical indication ‘Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski’ is rejected.
Vloga za preklic zaščitene geografske označbe „Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski“ se zavrne.
Done at Brussels, 14 November 2013.
V Bruslju, 14. novembra 2013
on measure SA.23324 — C 25/07 (ex NN 26/07) — Finland Finavia, Airpro and Ryanair at Tampere-Pirkkala airport
o ukrepu SA.23324 – C 25/07 (ex NN 26/07) – Finska Družbe Finavia, Airpro in Ryanair na letališču Tampere-Pirkkala
(notified under document C(2012) 5036)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 5036)
(Only the Finnish and Swedish versions are authentic)
(Besedilo v finskem in švedskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)