natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regarding FOAs relevant to bioethanol, recipients must use cellulosic biomass and produce a biofuel; the particular eligible biomass and biofuel(s) are delineated in each FOA.
Pri napovedih možnosti financiranja na področju bioetanola morajo prejemniki uporabiti celulozno biomaso in proizvajati biogorivo; posamezna vrsta upravičene biomase in biogoriv je določena v vsaki napovedi možnosti financiranja.
The scheme is administered through a series of annual competitive solicitations or FOAs that distribute appropriated funds.
Shema se upravlja prek sklopa letnih konkurenčnih razpisov ali napovedi možnosti financiranja, na podlagi katerih se razdelijo odobrena sredstva.
The competitive solicitations are open to eligible applicants from industry, academia and national laboratories.
Konkurenčni razpisi so na voljo upravičenim vložnikom s področja industrije, akademskega sveta in nacionalnih laboratorijev.
Eligible applicants submit proposals that are reviewed against the criteria set out in the FOA.
Upravičeni vložniki predložijo predloge, ki so pregledani na podlagi meril iz napovedi možnosti financiranja.
Once an award has been granted, the relevant authorities of the Department of Energy monitor the performance of the recipient against the scope, schedule and cost through the life of the award.
Ko je subvencija odobrena, ustrezni organi ministrstva za energijo spremljajo uspešnost prejemnika v smislu obsega dejavnosti, časovnega razporeda in stroškov med celotnim trajanjem subvencije.
Payment for costs incurred by the recipient in performance of the project is made on a reimbursement basis.
Plačilo za prejemnikove stroške, ki nastanejo med izvajanjem projekta, se izvede v obliki povračila sredstev.
No financial assistance agreements under this program support the development of corn bioethanol process technologies.
Noben sporazum o finančni pomoči iz tega programa ne zagotavlja podpore za razvoj tehnologij za obdelavo bioetanola iz koruze.
The assistance is solely focused on cellulosic advanced biofuels.
Pomoč je namenjena le celuloznim naprednim biogorivom.
Recipients must use cellulosic biomass and produce a biofuel; the particular eligible biomass and biofuel(s) are delineated in each FOA.
Prejemniki morajo uporabiti celulozno biomaso in proizvajati biogorivo; posamezna vrsta upravičene biomase in biogoriv je določena v vsaki napovedi možnosti financiranja.
During the IP there were five large scale bioethanol projects funded under this scheme.
V OP je bilo v okviru te sheme financiranih pet obsežnih projektov na področju bioetanola.
One of the companies in the sample received benefits from this scheme during the IP.
Eni od vzorčenih družb pa so bile v OP zagotovljene ugodnosti v okviru sheme.
This scheme is considered to be a subsidy in the sense of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation as the scheme provides a financial contribution by the Government of the USA in the form of grants.
Ta shema se šteje za subvencijo v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(i) osnovne uredbe, ker zagotavlja finančni prispevek vlade ZDA v obliki nepovratnih sredstev.
However, the investigation established that during the IP there was no commercial cellulosic bioethanol sold on the market.
Vendar je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da se komercialni celulozni bioetanol v OP na trgu ni prodajal.
In view of the particular circumstances in the present case, i.e. the fact that the scheme focuses for example on cellulosic biofuels, and the lack of commercial cellulosic bioethanol production, it is considered that during the IP this scheme did not confer any benefit on commercial producers of bioethanol in the USA and consequently did not have any impact on exports of bioethanol to the EU during the IP.
Glede na posebne okoliščine v tem primeru, tj. dejstvo, da je shema usmerjena npr. na celulozna biogoriva, in pomanjkanje proizvodnje komercialnega celuloznega bioetanola, se šteje, da v OP v okviru te sheme komercialnim proizvajalcem bioetanola v ZDA ni bila zagotovljena nobena ugodnost, zato v tem obdobju zadevna shema ni vplivala na izvoz bioetanola v EU.
It is also noted that in relation to the turnover of the product concerned by the sampled companies, the amount of subsidies provided under this scheme was insignificant.
Upoštevati je treba tudi, da je glede na prihodke, ki jih imajo vzorčene družbe od prodaje zadevnega izdelka, količina subvencij, zagotovljenih na podlagi te sheme, zanemarljiva.
Conclusion on Federal Schemes
Sklep o zveznih shemah
It was established that during the IP the US Government provided a credit of 0,45 USD for each gallon of ethanol used in producing alcohol fuel mixture.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je v OP vlada ZDA zagotovila olajšavo v višini 0,45 USD na galono etanola, uporabljenega pri proizvodnji alkoholne mešanice goriva.
This means that bioethanol blenders benefited from a reduced tax rate at the time of sale or received a direct payment, which offset their normal liability for a part of the excise duty on gasoline fuel.
To pomeni, da so bili pripravljavci mešanic bioetanola ob prodaji upravičeni do nižje davčne stopnje ali pa so prejeli neposredno plačilo, s čimer se je izravnala njihova običajna obveznost za plačilo dela trošarine na bencin.
Only to a lesser extent the mixture tax credit was used to offset income tax liability.
Davčna olajšava za mešanice goriv je bila samo delno uporabljena za izravnavo obveznosti plačila davka na prihodek.
This is a financial contribution, in the form of Government revenue foregone, which confers a benefit to the recipients in the form of a reduced tax liability.
To je finančni prispevek v obliki izpada prihodka države, ki za prejemnika pomeni ugodnost v obliki manjše davčne obveznosti.
The scheme is limited to companies that are involved in the bioethanol industry, i.e. the blending of bioethanol, and is therefore countervailable.
Shema je omejena na družbe, ki so vključene v industrijo bioetanola, tj. proizvodnjo mešanic bioetanola, pri čemer se lahko torej proti njim uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
The investigation established, however, that the main subsidy scheme, the bioethanol mixture tax credit, expired in the end of 2011 and has not been reintroduced.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da se je glavna subvencijska shema, tj. davčna olajšava za mešanice bioetanola, iztekla konec leta 2011 in da ni bila ponovno uvedena.
Following the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission has decided to continue the investigation without the imposition of provisional measures, one party claimed that various tax forms allow recipients to still claim this subsidy later than 31 December 2011.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je Komisija sprejela odločitev o nadaljevanju preiskave brez uvedbe začasnih ukrepov, je ena stran trdila, da lahko prejemniki po 31. decembru 2011 še vedno zaprosijo za to subvencijo s predložitvijo različnih obrazcev napovedi za odmero davka.
In reply to this claim it is noted that the investigation showed that the bioethanol mixture tax credit was predominantly claimed as an excise tax credit by a blender at the time of the blending of bioethanol with gasoline in order to reduce the excise tax liability of the claimant.
V odgovor na to trditev je treba navesti, da je preiskava pokazala, da je pripravljavec mešanic davčno olajšavo za mešanice bioetanola uveljavljal predvsem kot olajšavo pri plačilu trošarine ob mešanju bioetanola z bencinom, da bi se znižala trošarinska obveznost upravičenca.
Only to a limited extent the bioethanol mixture tax credit would be used to offset the income tax liability of the claimant.
Davčna olajšava za mešanice bioetanola bi se samo delno uporabila za izravnavo obveznosti upravičenca za plačilo davka na prihodek.
It goes without saying that there is a certain time span between the time of blending and the time when the credit is paid to the claimant.
Ni treba posebej poudarjati, da mešanje in izplačilo olajšave upravičencu nista izvedena istočasno.
The amount of mixture tax credits provided during the IP also relates to blending taking place before the IP.
Znesek davčne olajšave za mešanice, zagotovljen v OP, je povezan tudi z mešanjem, izvedenim pred OP.
Consequently, unless the scheme is retroactively reinstated, at the time of the decision whether or not to impose definitive measures in 2012, any claims for the mixture tax credit would be insignificant.
Zato bi bili ob sprejemanju odločitve, ali je treba dokončne ukrepe v letu 2012 sprejeti ali ne, morebitni zahtevki za davčno olajšavo za mešanice nepomembni, razen če bi bila shema ponovno uvedena retroaktivno.
Therefore, there are no elements to say that the subsidy continued.
Zato ni nobenih dokazov, na podlagi katerih bi lahko trdili, da se je subvencija še vedno izplačevala.
The same party argued that it is clear from the provisions of Article 15(1), fourth subparagraph, that a subsidy should not be considered as "withdrawn" until the defending party has brought convincing evidence that no payments, under any subsidy scheme benefitting producers/exporters of the product concerned, could still be made.
Ista stran je trdila, da je na podlagi določb četrtega odstavka člena 15(1) jasno, da subvencije ne bi smeli šteti za „ukinjeno“, dokler tožena stranka ne predloži prepričljivih dokazov, da v okviru nobene sheme subvencij, do katere so upravičeni proizvajalci/izvozniki zadevnega izdelka, ni več mogoče izvesti plačila.
It should be noted, however, that the bioethanol mixture tax credit was the only subsidy scheme which provided potentially countervailable subsidies during the IP and this scheme has expired.
Vendar bi bilo treba upoštevati, da je bila davčna olajšava za mešanice bioetanola edina shema subvencij, v okviru katere bi bilo mogoče v OP zagotoviti subvencije, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, pri čemer se je ta shema iztekla.
The other investigated schemes which provided benefits directly to the bioethanol industry were insignificant.
Druge sheme, vključene v preiskavo, v okviru katerih so se ugodnosti zagotovile neposredno industriji bioetanola, so bile nepomembne.
This argument is therefore rejected.
Ta argument se zato zavrne.
The party has also claimed that the income tax credit for producers of cellulosic bioethanol, which is described in recitals (79) to (85) above, is a scheme designed to replace the mixture tax credit scheme as a means of subsidising the product concerned.
Zadevna stran je trdila tudi, da je davčna olajšava na dobiček za proizvajalce celuloznega bioetanola, ki je opisana v uvodnih izjavah (79) do (85), shema, ki naj bi nadomestila shemo davčne olajšave za mešanice goriv kot način subvencioniranja zadevnega izdelka.
In reply to this claim it is noted that, while support for first generation bioethanol has been mostly phased out, schemes for second generation biofuels has increased.
V odgovor na to trditev je treba opozoriti, da so se sheme za biogoriva druge generacije povečevale, medtem ko se je podpora za bioetanol prve generacije postopno opuščala.
However, the production of second generation biofuels is not significant and therefore granted subsidies are at this stage very limited.
Vendar je obseg proizvodnje biogoriv druge generacije zelo majhen, zato so odobrene subvencije v tej fazi zelo omejene.
It should be clarified that the income tax credit for producers of cellulosic bioethanol is not a replacement scheme for the mixture tax credit scheme for the simple reason that it is already in existence.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da davčna olajšava na dobiček za proizvajalce celuloznega bioetanola ni nadomestna shema davčne olajšave za mešanice goriv, in sicer iz preprostega razloga, ker ta že obstaja.
Moreover, income tax credit for producers of cellulosic bioethanol is, as the name of scheme suggest, an incentive to producers of cellulosic bioethanol.
Poleg tega davčna olajšava na dobiček za proizvajalce celuloznega bioetanola pomeni spodbudo za proizvajalce celuloznega bioetanola, kar je razvidno tudi iz imena sheme.
The mixture tax credit provides an incentive to blenders.
Z davčnimi olajšavami za mešanice goriv se zagotovi spodbuda za pripravljavce mešanic.
The investigation showed that in the majority of cases the one claiming the mixture tax credit was a blender/trader with excise tax liability such as a petrochemical company.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bil v večini primerov subjekt, ki je uveljavljal davčno olajšavo za mešanice goriv, pripravljavec mešanic/trgovec s trošarinsko obveznostjo, na primer petrokemična družba.
In other words, it was not bioethanol producers who claimed the bulk of the mixture tax credit during the IP.
To pomeni, da davčne olajšave za mešanice goriv v OP niso uveljavljali predvsem proizvajalci bioetanola.
Therefore, it cannot be argued that the income tax credit for producers of cellulosic bioethanol replaces the mixture tax credit.
Zato ni mogoče trditi, da davčna olajšava na dobiček za proizvajalce celuloznega bioetanola nadomešča davčno olajšavo za mešanice goriv.
Consequently, this claim is rejected.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
Finally, the party has claimed that the benefits can still be conferred after the end of the mixture tax credit scheme due to the continued utilization of fixed assets paid by the subsidy.
Nazadnje je zadevna stran trdila, da so lahko ugodnosti še vedno zagotovljene po izteku sheme davčne olajšave za mešanice goriv zaradi nadaljnje uporabe osnovnih sredstev, pridobljenih na podlagi subvencije.
It was argued that in case of recurring subsidies linked to the acquisition of fixed assets, benefits accruing from previous years within the depreciation period should be taken into account when calculating the benefit.
Trdila je, da bi bilo treba v primeru ponavljajočih se subvencij, povezanih s pridobivanjem osnovnih sredstev, pri izračunu ugodnosti upoštevati ugodnosti v obdobju amortizacije, ki izhajajo iz prejšnjih let.
First of all it is noted that the subsidy is not linked to the acquisition of fixed assets.
Najprej je bilo ugotovljeno, da subvencija ni povezana s pridobivanjem osnovnih sredstev.
The mixture tax credit is a recurring subsidy in the sense that it is periodic and the benefits are presumed to accrue in the year in which they are granted.
Davčna olajšava za mešanice je ponavljajoča se subvencija, ker je periodična, pri čemer naj bi bile ugodnosti pridobljene v letu odobritve subvencije.
Moreover, as mentioned above, during the IP, the claimants were only to a very little extent bioethanol producers.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno zgoraj, je bil v OP le majhen del upravičencev proizvajalcev bioetanola.
Therefore, this claim is rejected.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
Other Federal Schemes
Druge zvezne sheme
The investigation established that the US Department of Agriculture's Bioenergy Program expired in 2006 and was not re-introduced.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je program za energijo ameriškega ministrstva za kmetijstvo iztekel leta 2006 in da ni bil ponovno uveden.
As regards the USDA Bioenergy for Advanced Biofuels, the USDA Biorefinery Assistance Program, the USDA Biomass Crop Assistance Program, the USDA Rural Energy for America Program and the Department of Energy Biorefinery Project Grants, the investigation showed that to the extent these six schemes provided benefits to production of bioethanol during the IP, the amount of subsidies was insignificant.
Kar zadeva program za bioenergijo za napredna biogoriva, program pomoči za biorafinerije, program pomoči za kulture za biomaso, program za energijo na podeželju za ZDA ameriškega ministrstva za kmetijstvo in nepovratna sredstva za projekte biorafinerij ministrstva za energijo, je preiskava pokazala, da je bil znesek subvencij zanemarljiv, čeprav so bile na podlagi teh šestih shem zagotovljene ugodnosti za proizvodnjo bioetanola v OP.
The investigation showed that three State schemes, i.e. the E85 Infrastructure Grants run by the State of Illinois, the Biofuels Infrastructure grants run by the State of Iowa and the E85 Fuelling Infrastructure Grans run by the State of Minnesota are not applicable to bioethanol producers.
Preiskava je pokazala, da tri sheme na ravni zveznih držav, tj. nepovratna sredstva za infrastrukturo E85 zvezne države Illinois, nepovratna sredstva za infrastrukturo na področju biogoriv zvezne države Iowa in nepovratna sredstva za infrastrukturo na področju goriv E85 zvezne države Minnesota, ne veljajo za proizvajalce bioetanola.
These schemes provide fuel retail establishments with support for the installation of fuel pumps capable of delivering high-ethanol content fuel and are limited to bioethanol retailers.
Na podlagi teh shem se maloprodajnim obratom za gorivo zagotovi podpora za namestitev črpalk za gorivo, ki se lahko uporabljajo za gorivo z visoko vsebnostjo etanola, pri čemer so te sheme omejene na trgovce na drobno z bioetanolom.
Consequently, bioethanol producers receive no benefits from these schemes.
Zato se proizvajalcem bioetanola ne zagotovi nobena ugodnost v okviru teh shem.
In this regard, it is noted that none of the companies in the sample received benefits from these schemes directly or indirectly.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da nobeni od vzorčenih družb niso bile neposredno ali posredno zagotovljene ugodnosti v okviru teh shem.
Moreover, it was clarified by the US authorities that the State of Minnesota does not have a Cellulosic Ethanol Investments Tax Credit scheme as claimed by the complainant.
Poleg tega so organi ZDA pojasnili, da zvezna država Minnesota nima sheme davčnih olajšav za naložbe na področju celuloznega etanola, kot je trdil pritožnik.
It was clarified that the State of Minnesota enacted a law in early 2010 called the 'Small Business Investment Tax Credit' commonly referred to as the 'Angel Investment Tax Credit'.
Pojasnjeno je bilo, da je zvezna država Minnesota v začetku leta 2010 sprejela zakon, imenovan „Davčna olajšava za naložbe malih podjetij“, znan tudi kot „Davčna olajšava za naložbe poslovnih angelov“.
Contrary to what is alleged in the complaint, the Angel Investment Tax Credit provides no tax credits to businesses, but rather to investors who invest in small businesses.
V nasprotju s trditvami pritožnika Davčna olajšava za naložbe poslovnih angelov ne zagotavlja olajšav podjetjem, ampak vlagateljem, ki vlagajo v mala podjetja.
According to the authorities of the USA, this scheme was not in operation during the IP, has not received funding since July 2007 and has been inoperative since 2008 when funds were exhausted.
Po navedbah organov ZDA se ta shema v OP ni izvajala, ni bila financirana od julija 2007 in se je prenehala uporabljati leta 2008, ko je zmanjkalo sredstev.
When operative, the scheme authorised grants for the construction of new renewable fuel production facilities or the expansion of existing facilities.
Ko se je ta shema izvajala, so bila na njeni podlagi zagotovljena nepovratna sredstva za gradnjo novih obratov za proizvodnjo obnovljivega goriva ali nadgradnjo starih.
Two grants were granted in 2008 when the scheme was still in operation, and two companies outside the sample located in Illinois each received a grant.
Leta 2008, ko se je shema še vedno izvajala, so bila nepovratna sredstva dodeljena dvakrat, pri čemer sta nepovratna sredstva prejeli dve nevzorčeni družbi iz Illinoisa.
However, this scheme is no longer in operation and none of the sampled companies availed of benefits under this scheme during the IP.
Vendar se ta shema ne izvaja več, pri čemer v OP nobeni od vzorčenih družb niso bile zagotovljene ugodnosti v okviru te sheme.
Iowa Alternate Energy Revolving Loan Programme
Program obnovljivih posojil za alternativno energijo zvezne države Iowa
The Alternate Energy Revolving Loan Program (AERLP) is authorized by section 476.46 Code of Iowa 1997 as amended.
Program obnovljivih posojil za alternativno energijo zvezne države Iowa (Alternate Energy Revolving Loan Program – AERLP) je bil sprejet v skladu z oddelkom 476.46 zakonika zvezne države Iowa iz leta 1997, kakor je bil spremenjen.
This code states that the Iowa Energy Center shall establish and administer an alternate energy revolving loan program and creates an alternative energy revolving loan fund in the office of the Treasurer of State to be administered by the Energy Center.
Ta zakonik določa, da Center za energijo v Iowi ustanovi in upravlja program obnovljivih posojil za alternativno energijo in v okviru urada državnega zakladnika ustanovi obnovljiv posojilni sklad za alternativno energijo, ki ga upravlja Center za energijo.
Money in the AERLP fund may be used to provide loans for the construction of alternate energy production facilities or small hydro facilities as defined in section 476.46 Code of Iowa 1997, as amended.
Sredstva sklada AERLP se lahko uporabijo za zagotavljanje posojil za gradnjo obratov za proizvodnjo obnovljive energije ali manjših vodnih obratov, kot je opredeljeno v oddelku 476.46 zakonika zvezne države Iowa iz leta 1997, kakor je bil spremenjen.
According to the authorities of the United States, no bioethanol production facilities received loans pursuant to the AERLP for the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and the IP.
Po navedbah organov ZDA noben obrat za proizvodnjo bioetanola ni prejel posojila v skladu z AERLP za leta 2008, 2009, 2010 in OP.
None of the sampled companies received benefits under this scheme.
Nobeni od vzorčenih družb niso bile zagotovljene ugodnosti v okviru te sheme.
Consequently, it was decided not to further investigate this scheme in the context of this proceeding.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da nadaljnja preiskava te sheme v okviru tega postopka ni potrebna.
The current Nebraska State motor fuels tax rate is 0,267 USD per gallon for all gasoline, gasohol, diesel fuel, bioethanol and compressed gases sold in the State.
Sedanja davčna stopnja za motorna goriva v zvezni državi Nebraska je 0,267 USD na galono za vse vrste bencina, mešanice bencina in alkohola, dizelsko gorivo, bioetanol in stisnjene pline, ki se prodajajo v tej zvezni državi.
The Ethanol Production Incentive scheme in effect during the IP provides a 0,18 USD per gallon tax credit to qualifying ethanol production facilities in operation on or before 30 June 2004.
Na podlagi sheme za spodbujanje proizvodnje etanola, ki se je izvajala v OP, se upravičenim obratom za proizvodnjo etanola, ki so delovali 30. junija 2004 ali pred tem datumom, zagotovi davčna olajšava v višini 0,18 USD na galono.
This scheme did not benefit any of the companies in the sample.
Nobeni od vzorčenih družb niso bile zagotovljene ugodnosti v okviru te sheme.
In any event, it appears that the amount of subsidy was negligible when compared to the total production of bioethanol in the USA.
V vsakem primeru je bilo število subvencij zanemarljivo v primerjavi s celotno proizvodnjo bioetanola v ZDA.
The State of South Dakota administers a bioethanol producer payment program that provides financial assistance for eligible bioethanol plants of 0,20 USD per gallon of bioethanol produced up to a possible 1 million USD annually per facility.
Zvezna država Južna Dakota upravlja program subvencij za proizvajalce bioetanola, na podlagi katerega se zagotovi finančna pomoč obratom za bioetanol v višini 0,20 USD na galono proizvedenega bioetanola, in sicer do največ 1 milijona USD na leto na obrat.
The ethyl alcohol must be fully distilled and produced in South Dakota, must be 99 % pure, must be distilled from cereal grains and must be denatured.
Etilni alkohol mora biti v celoti destiliran in proizveden v Južni Dakoti, pri čemer je treba uporabiti 99-odstotno čist etilni alkohol, ki je destiliran iz žitnih zrn in denaturiran.
The ethanol production payment is only available for qualifying ethyl alcohol produced by plants than began production on or before 31 December 2006.
Plačilo za proizvodnjo etanola je na voljo samo za upravičen etilni alkohol, proizveden v obratih, ki so začeli s proizvodnjo 31. decembra 2006 ali pred tem datumom.
Each eligible facility may receive a maximum of 83333 USD per month of production incentive payments.
Vsak upravičen obrat lahko v okviru subvencij za spodbujanje proizvodnje prejme največ 83333 USD na mesec.