natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The first phase of a Common European Asylum System was achieved through the adoption of relevant legal instruments, including Directive 2003/9/EC, provided for in the Treaties.
Prva faza skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema je bila izpolnjena s sprejetjem ustreznih pravnih aktov, vključno z Direktivo 2003/9/ES, določenih v Pogodbah.
The European Council, at its meeting of 10-11 December 2009, adopted the Stockholm Programme, which reiterated the commitment to the objective of establishing by 2012 a common area of protection and solidarity based on a common asylum procedure and a uniform status for those granted international protection based on high protection standards and fair and effective procedures.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju 10. in 11. decembra 2009 sprejel stockholmski program, v katerem je ponovno poudarjena zaveza k cilju, da se do leta 2012 vzpostavi skupno območje zaščite in solidarnosti na podlagi skupnega azilnega postopka ter enotnega statusa oseb, ki jim je bila priznana mednarodna zaščita, na podlagi visokih standardov zaščite ter pravičnih in učinkovitih postopkov.
The Stockholm Programme further provides that it is crucial that individuals, regardless of the Member State in which their application for international protection is made, are offered an equivalent level of treatment as regards reception conditions.
Stockholmski program nadalje določa, da je bistveno, da se posamezniki glede pogojev za sprejem obravnavajo enako, ne glede na to, v kateri državi članici so vložili prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito.
The resources of the European Refugee Fund and of the European Asylum Support Office should be mobilised to provide adequate support to Member States’ efforts in implementing the standards set in the second phase of the Common European Asylum System, in particular to those Member States which are faced with specific and disproportionate pressures on their asylum systems, due in particular to their geographical or demographic situation.
Da se zagotovi ustrezna podpora prizadevanjem držav članic pri izvajanju standardov, določenih v drugi fazi vzpostavljanja skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, predvsem tistim državam članicam, ki se zlasti zaradi svojega geografskega ali demografskega položaja srečujejo s posebnimi in nesorazmernimi pritiski na njihove azilne sisteme, bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva Evropskega sklada za begunce in Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada.
In the light of the results of the evaluations undertaken of the implementation of the first-phase instruments, it is appropriate, at this stage, to confirm the principles underlying Directive 2003/9/EC with a view to ensuring improved reception conditions for applicants for international protection (‘applicants’).
Glede na rezultate opravljenih ocen izvajanja aktov prve faze je na tej stopnji primerno potrditi načela, na katerih je zasnovana Direktiva 2003/9/ES, da bi se zagotovili boljši pogoji za sprejem za prosilce za mednarodno zaščito (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prosilci).
In order to ensure equal treatment of applicants throughout the Union, this Directive should apply during all stages and types of procedures concerning applications for international protection, in all locations and facilities hosting applicants and for as long as they are allowed to remain on the territory of the Member States as applicants.
Da bi se po vsej Uniji zagotovilo enako obravnavanje prosilcev, bi se morala ta direktiva uporabljati na vseh stopnjah in za vse vrste postopkov v zvezi s prošnjami za mednarodno zaščito, na vseh lokacijah in v objektih, ki sprejemajo prosilce in dokler lahko slednji ostanejo na ozemlju držav članic kot prosilci.
In applying this Directive, Member States should seek to ensure full compliance with the principles of the best interests of the child and of family unity, in accordance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms respectively.
Pri uporabi te direktive bi si morale države članice prizadevati za zagotovitev celovitega upoštevanja načel največje koristi otroka in enotnosti družine v skladu z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, Konvencijo Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah iz leta 1989 in Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Directive, Member States are bound by obligations under instruments of international law to which they are party.
Glede obravnavanja oseb, ki spadajo na področje uporabe te direktive, države članice zavezujejo obveznosti iz instrumentov mednarodnega prava, katerih pogodbenice so.
Standards for the reception of applicants that will suffice to ensure them a dignified standard of living and comparable living conditions in all Member States should be laid down.
Treba bi bilo določiti standarde za sprejem prosilcev, ki bi zadoščali, da se jim zagotovi dostojen življenjski standard in primerljivi življenjski pogoji v vseh državah članicah.
The harmonisation of conditions for the reception of applicants should help to limit the secondary movements of applicants influenced by the variety of conditions for their reception.
Harmonizacija pogojev za sprejem prosilcev bi morala pomagati omejiti sekundarno gibanje prosilcev, na katero vplivajo različni pogoji za njihov sprejem.
With a view to ensuring equal treatment amongst all applicants for international protection and guaranteeing consistency with current EU asylum acquis, in particular with Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted [5], it is appropriate to extend the scope of this Directive in order to include applicants for subsidiary protection.
Za zagotovitev enake obravnave vseh prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito in zagotovitev skladnosti z veljavnim pravnim redom EU na področju azila, zlasti Direktivo 2011/95/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da so upravičeni do mednarodne zaščite, glede enotnega statusa beguncev ali oseb, upravičenih do subsidiarne zaščite, in glede vsebine te zaščite [5] je primerno, da se področje uporabe te direktive razširi na prosilce za subsidiarno zaščito.
The reception of persons with special reception needs should be a primary concern for national authorities in order to ensure that such reception is specifically designed to meet their special reception needs.
Sprejem oseb s posebnimi potrebami glede sprejema bi moral biti glavna skrb nacionalnih organov, da se zagotovi, da je tak sprejem posebej oblikovan tako, da ustreza njihovim posebnim potrebam glede sprejema.
The detention of applicants should be applied in accordance with the underlying principle that a person should not be held in detention for the sole reason that he or she is seeking international protection, particularly in accordance with the international legal obligations of the Member States and with Article 31 of the Geneva Convention.
Pridržanje prosilcev bi bilo treba uporabljati v skladu z osnovnim načelom, da se osebe ne bi smelo pridržati zgolj zato, ker prosi za mednarodno zaščito, zlasti v skladu z mednarodnimi pravnimi obveznostmi držav članic ter členom 31 Ženevske konvencije.
Applicants may be detained only under very clearly defined exceptional circumstances laid down in this Directive and subject to the principle of necessity and proportionality with regard to both to the manner and the purpose of such detention.
Prosilce se sme pridržati le v zelo jasno opredeljenih izjemnih okoliščinah, ki jih določa ta direktiva, ter ob upoštevanju načela nujnosti in sorazmernosti tako glede načina kot tudi namena takega pridržanja.
Where an applicant is held in detention he or she should have effective access to the necessary procedural guarantees, such as judicial remedy before a national judicial authority.
Kadar je prosilec pridržan, bi moral imeti dejanski dostop do potrebnih procesnih jamstev, kot je pravno sredstvo pred nacionalnim sodnim organom.
With regard to administrative procedures relating to the grounds for detention, the notion of ‘due diligence’ at least requires that Member States take concrete and meaningful steps to ensure that the time needed to verify the grounds for detention is as short as possible, and that there is a real prospect that such verification can be carried out successfully in the shortest possible time.
Države članice glede upravnih postopkov v zvezi z razlogi za pridržanje glede pojma „primerna skrbnost“ sprejmejo vsaj konkretne in smiselne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da je mogoče razloge za pridržanje preveriti v najkrajšem možnem času ter da obstaja realna možnost, da bo tako preverjanje lahko tudi uspešno opravljeno v najkrajšem možnem času.
Detention shall not exceed the time reasonably needed to complete the relevant procedures.
Pridržanje ne sme biti daljše, kot je razumno potrebno za dokončanje vseh zadevnih postopkov.
The grounds for detention set out in this Directive are without prejudice to other grounds for detention, including detention grounds within the framework of criminal proceedings, which are applicable under national law, unrelated to the third country national’s or stateless person’s application for international protection.
Razlogi za pridržanje, določeni v tej direktivi, ne posegajo v druge razloge za pridržanje, vključno z razlogi za pridržanje v okviru kazenskega postopka, ki se uporabljajo po nacionalnem pravu, ki niso povezani s prošnjo državljana tretje države ali osebe brez državljanstva za mednarodno zaščito.
Applicants who are in detention should be treated with full respect for human dignity and their reception should be specifically designed to meet their needs in that situation.
Pridržani prosilci bi morali biti obravnavani s polnim spoštovanjem človeškega dostojanstva in njihov sprejem bi moral biti posebej oblikovan tako, da ustreza njihovim potrebam v tej situaciji.
In particular, Member States should ensure that Article 37 of the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child is applied.
Države članice bi morale zlasti zagotoviti, da se uporablja člen 37 Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah iz leta 1989.
There may be cases where it is not possible in practice to immediately ensure certain reception guarantees in detention, for example due to the geographical location or the specific structure of the detention facility.
Pojavijo se lahko primeri, v katerih pri pridržanju v praksi ni mogoče takoj zagotoviti nekaterih sprejemnih jamstev, na primer zaradi geografske lokacije ali posebne strukture ustanove za pridržanje.
However, any derogation from those guarantees should be temporary and should only be applied under the circumstances set out in this Directive.
Vendar pa bi moralo biti vsako odstopanje od teh jamstev začasno in bi se moralo uporabiti le v izjemnih okoliščinah, določenih v tej direktivi.
Derogations should only be applied in exceptional circumstances and should be duly justified, taking into consideration the circumstances of each case, including the level of severity of the derogation applied, its duration and its impact on the applicant concerned.
Odstopanja bi se morala uporabljati le v izjemnih okoliščinah in bi morala biti ustrezno utemeljena, ob upoštevanju okoliščin vsakega primera, vključno z ravnjo resnosti uporabljenega odstopanja, njegovim trajanjem in učinkom na zadevnega prosilca.
In order to better ensure the physical and psychological integrity of the applicants, detention should be a measure of last resort and may only be applied after all non-custodial alternative measures to detention have been duly examined.
Da se bolje zagotovi telesna in psihološka integriteta prosilcev, bi moralo biti pridržanje zadnja možnost in bi se smelo uporabiti le, ko so že bili ustrezno preučeni vsi drugi ukrepi, ki ne vključujejo pripora.
Any alternative measure to detention must respect the fundamental human rights of applicants.
Pri vsakem drugem ukrepu, ki ne vključujejo pripora, je treba spoštovati temeljne človekove pravice prosilcev.
In order to ensure compliance with the procedural guarantees consisting in the opportunity to contact organisations or groups of persons that provide legal assistance, information should be provided on such organisations and groups of persons.
Da se zagotovi skladnost s procesnimi jamstvi, ki omogočajo stik z organizacijami ali skupinami oseb, ki nudijo pravno pomoč, bi bilo treba zagotoviti informacije o takih organizacijah in skupinah oseb.
When deciding on housing arrangements, Member States should take due account of the best interests of the child, as well as of the particular circumstances of any applicant who is dependent on family members or other close relatives such as unmarried minor siblings already present in the Member State.
Države članice bi morale pri odločanju o nastanitvi ustrezno upoštevati največjo koristi otroka, pa tudi posebne okoliščine vsakega prosilca, ki je odvisen od družinskih članov ali drugih bližnjih sorodnikov, kot so neporočeni mladoletni bratje ali sestre, ki so že v državi članici.
In order to promote the self-sufficiency of applicants and to limit wide discrepancies between Member States, it is essential to provide clear rules on the applicants’ access to the labour market.
Za spodbujanje samozadostnosti prosilcev ter zmanjšanje velikih neskladnosti med državami članicami je bistveno zagotoviti jasna pravila glede dostopa prosilcev do trga dela.
To ensure that the material support provided to applicants complies with the principles set out in this Directive, it is necessary that Member States determine the level of such support on the basis of relevant references.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti gmotne pomoči, ki jo prejmejo prosilci, z načeli iz te direktive je nujno, da države članice določijo raven take pomoči na podlagi ustreznih referenčnih vrednosti.
That does not mean that the amount granted should be the same as for nationals.
To ne pomeni, da bi morali dobiti enako količino kot državljani.
Member States may grant less favourable treatment to applicants than to nationals as specified in this Directive.
Države članice smejo prosilcem zagotoviti manj ugodno obravnavo kot državljanom, kot je določeno v tej direktivi.
The possibility of abuse of the reception system should be restricted by specifying the circumstances in which material reception conditions for applicants may be reduced or withdrawn while at the same time ensuring a dignified standard of living for all applicants.
Možnost zlorabe sistema za sprejem bi bilo treba omejiti, tako da se navedejo okoliščine, v katerih se lahko materialni pogoji za sprejem za prosilce omejijo ali ukinejo, hkrati pa se vsem prosilcem zagotovi dostojen življenjski standard.
The efficiency of national reception systems and cooperation among Member States in the field of reception of applicants should be secured.
Treba bi bilo zagotoviti učinkovitost nacionalnih sistemov za sprejem in sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju sprejema prosilcev.
Appropriate coordination should be encouraged between the competent authorities as regards the reception of applicants, and harmonious relationships between local communities and accommodation centres should therefore be promoted.
Treba bi bilo spodbujati ustrezno koordinacijo med pristojnimi organi v zvezi s sprejemom prosilcev, zato bi bilo treba spodbujati skladne odnose med lokalnimi skupnostmi in nastanitvenimi centri.
Member States should have the power to introduce or maintain more favourable provisions for third-country nationals and stateless persons who ask for international protection from a Member State.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da uvedejo ali ohranjajo bolj ugodne določbe za državljane tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva, ki državo članico zaprosijo za mednarodno zaščito.
In this spirit, Member States are also invited to apply the provisions of this Directive in connection with procedures for deciding on applications for forms of protection other than that provided for under Directive 2011/95/EU.
V tem duhu se države članice tudi poziva, da določbe te direktive uporabljajo v povezavi s postopki za odločanje o vlogah za druge oblike zaščite, ki niso določene v Direktivi 2011/95/EU.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to establish standards for the reception of applicants in Member States, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of this Directive, be better achieved at the Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer zagotoviti standarde za sprejem prosilcev v državah članicah, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in se ta cilja zaradi obsega in vplivov te direktive lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, kot je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents of 28 September 2011 [6], Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
V skladu s Skupno politično izjavo z dne 28. septembra 2011 držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih [6] se države članice zavezujejo, da bodo v upravičenih primerih obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile en ali več dokumentov, v katerih se pojasnjeni razmerje med sestavnimi elementi direktive in ustrezajočimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 and Article 4a(1) of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the TEU, and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, the United Kingdom and Ireland are not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and are not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 ter členom 4a(1) Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola Združeno kraljestvo in Irska ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanju ni zavezujoča in se v njiju ne uporablja.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki so priznana z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
In particular, this Directive seeks to ensure full respect for human dignity and to promote the application of Articles 1, 4, 6, 7, 18, 21, 24 and 47 of the Charter and has to be implemented accordingly.
Namen te direktive je zlasti zagotoviti dosledno spoštovanje človeškega dostojanstva in spodbujati uporabo členov 1, 4, 6, 7, 18, 21, 24 in 47 Listine ter jo je treba temu ustrezno izvajati.
The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those provisions which represent a substantive change as compared with Directive 2003/9/EC.
Obveznost prenosa te direktive v nacionalno pravo bi morala biti omejena na tiste določbe, ki pomenijo vsebinsko spremembo v primerjavi z Direktivo 2003/9/ES.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limit for transposition into national law of Directive 2003/9/EC set out in Annex II, Part B,
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v obveznosti držav članic glede rokov za prenos Direktive 2003/9/ES v nacionalno pravo, kot so določeni v delu B Priloge II –
PURPOSE, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE
NAMEN, OPREDELITEV POJMOV IN PODROČJE UPORABE
The purpose of this Directive is to lay down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (‘applicants’) in Member States.
Namen te direktive je določiti standarde za sprejem prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prosilci) v državah članicah.
‘family members’ means, in so far as the family already existed in the country of origin, the following members of the applicant’s family who are present in the same Member State in relation to the application for international protection:
zakonca prosilca ali njegovega neporočenega partnerja v trajni zvezi, kadar zakon ali praksa zadevne države članice neporočene pare obravnava na primerljiv način s poročenimi pari po njenem pravu o državljanih tretjih držav;
the spouse of the applicant or his or her unmarried partner in a stable relationship, where the law or practice of the Member State concerned treats unmarried couples in a way comparable to married couples under its law relating to third-country nationals;
mladoletne otroke parov iz prve alinee ali prosilca, pod pogojem, da so neporočeni, in ne glede na to, ali so bili rojeni v zakonu ali izven zakona ali posvojeni, kot določa nacionalno pravo;
This Directive shall apply to all third-country nationals and stateless persons who make an application for international protection on the territory, including at the border, in the territorial waters or in the transit zones of a Member State, as long as they are allowed to remain on the territory as applicants, as well as to family members, if they are covered by such application for international protection according to national law.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za vse državljane tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva, ki podajo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito na ozemlju, vključno na meji, v teritorialnih vodah ali na tranzitnih območjih države članice, dokler jim je kot prosilcem dovoljeno ostati na ozemlju, ter tudi za družinske člane, če so po nacionalnem pravu vključeni v tako prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito.
This Directive shall not apply when the provisions of Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof [7] are applied.
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja, kadar se uporabljajo določbe Direktive Sveta 2001/55/ES z dne 20. julija 2001 o najnižjih standardih za dodelitev začasne zaščite v primeru množičnega prihoda razseljenih oseb in o ukrepih za uravnoteženje prizadevanj in posledic za države članice pri sprejemanju takšnih oseb [7].
Member States may decide to apply this Directive in connection with procedures for deciding on applications for kinds of protection other than that emanating from Directive 2011/95/EU.
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da to direktivo uporabljajo v povezavi s postopki odločanja o prošnjah za druge oblike zaščite, ki ne izhajajo iz Direktive 2011/95/EU.
Member States may introduce or retain more favourable provisions in the field of reception conditions for applicants and other close relatives of the applicant who are present in the same Member State when they are dependent on him or her, or for humanitarian reasons, insofar as these provisions are compatible with this Directive.
Države članice lahko uvedejo ali obdržijo ugodnejše določbe glede pogojev za sprejem prosilcev in drugih ožjih sorodnikov prosilca, ki so prisotni v isti državi članici, kadar so od njega odvisni, ali iz humanitarnih razlogov, v kolikor so te določbe skladne s to direktivo.
GENERAL PROVISIONS ON RECEPTION CONDITIONS
SPLOŠNE DOLOČBE O POGOJIH ZA SPREJEM