natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notes that the Court of Auditors identified a number of significant shortcomings related to post-employment issues which weaken the prevention of ‘revolving doors’ situations;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče odkrilo številne pomanjkljivosti pri obravnavanju vprašanj, ki se pojavljajo v obdobju po prenehanju zaposlitve, zaradi česar je preprečevanje navzkrižja interesov v primerih, ko se uradniki izmenično zaposlujejo v agencijah in zasebnem sektorju, še toliko težje;
supports the Court of Auditors’ recommendation stressing the need to address those post-employment issues, and takes the view that the ‘cooling-off’ period of anyone who has served as director of an agency or has discharged major responsibilities within an agency needs to be clarified;
podpira priporočilo Računskega sodišča, da je omenjena vprašanja treba obravnavati, in meni, da je nujno jasneje opredeliti tudi prehodno obdobje za nekdanje direktorje agencij in vse, ki so imeli odgovorne funkcije v agencijah;
Endorses the Court of Auditors’ recommendation inviting all Union institutions and decentralised bodies to examine whether the recommendations of its Special Report No 15/2012 are relevant and applicable to them;
odobrava priporočilo Računskega sodišča, naj vse institucije in decentralizirani organi Unije preučijo, ali se priporočila iz posebnega poročila št. 15/2012 nanašajo tudi nanje;
considers that all agencies should develop and implement comprehensive independence policies and procedures, inter alia, establishing a breach of trust mechanism and clear sanctions or changing those already in place on the basis of lessons learned and recommendations of Special Report No 15/2012;
meni, da bi morale vse agencije sestaviti in uresničevati vsestranske pravilnike in postopke, ki bodo med drugim opredeljevali mehanizem za zlorabo zaupanja in nedvoumne sankcije, oziroma na osnovi izkušenj in priporočil Računskega sodišča iz posebnega poročila št. 15/2012 spremeniti obstoječe pravilnike in postopke;
calls on the agencies to report to the discharge authority on this matter before the end of 2013;
poziva agencije, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice še pred iztekom leta 2013 obvestijo o doseženih rezultatih;
Welcomes the European Ombudsman’s decision to conduct an own initiative inquiry into cases of ‘revolving door-type’ conflicts of interest in several cases recently reported at the Commission;
pozdravlja odločitev Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, da bo za več primerov, o katerih je pred kratkim poročala Komisija, na lastno pobudo začel preiskovati primere navzkrižja interesov, pri katerih se strokovnjaki izmenično zaposlujejo v agencijah in zasebnem sektorju;
endorses the warning issued by the Ombudsman according to which, although effective management of conflicts of interest is a key part of good governance and sound ethical conduct, not all problems relating to governance and ethics necessarily imply a conflict of interest;
se strinja z opozorilom Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ki meni, da je učinkovita obravnava navzkrižja interesov sicer osrednji del dobrega upravljanja in dobrega etičnega ravnanja, vendar pa ne gre vseh težav, ki se nanašajo na upravljanje in etiko, nujno pripisati navzkrižju interesov;
takes the view that conflicts of interests need to be addressed within their strict limits, and stresses the need for training and prevention strategies and actions to be promoted as regards conflicts of interest in the Union institutions;
meni, da je treba navzkrižja interesov obravnavati v okviru omejitev, in poudarja, da je treba spodbujati strategije in ukrepe za usposabljanje in preprečevanje na področju navzkrižja interesov v institucijah Unije;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ recommendation for the Union to consider further developing its regulatory framework dedicated to the management of conflict of interest situations;
pozdravlja priporočilo Računskega sodišča Uniji, naj razmisli o nadaljnjih spremembah regulativnega okvira za obravnavanje navzkrižja interesov;
Welcomes the interinstitutional Joint Statement of 19 July 2012 on decentralised agencies, and in particular its provisions on management and prevention of conflict of interest (paragraphs 11 and 18) and on the independence of their scientific experts (paragraph 20);
pozdravlja medinstitucionalno izjavo o decentraliziranih agencijah z dne 19. julija 2012, zlasti njene določbe o obvladovanju in preprečevanju navzkrižja interesov (odstavka 11 in 18) in o neodvisnosti znanstvenih strokovnjakov (odstavek 20);
Calls on the Court of Auditors to conduct an assessment of the implementation by the agencies of any measures taken on the basis of the recommendations made to them in its Special Report No 15/2012;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj razišče, kako agencije izvajajo ukrepe, sprejete na podlagi priporočil iz posebnega poročila št. 15/2012;
calls on the Network to develop proposals based on exchanges of best practices and lessons learned to enable it to identify, in cooperation with the Commission and the Court of Auditors, those agencies, or fields in which they operate, where there is greatest risk of conflicts of interest;
poziva mrežo agencij, naj na podlagi izmenjave primerov najboljše prakse in izkušenj iz preteklosti oblikuje predloge, s katerimi bi bilo mogoče v sodelovanju s Komisijo in Računskim sodiščem opredeliti tiste agencije ali področja, na katerih delujejo, pri katerih obstaja največje tveganje navzkrižja interesov;
welcomes, in that context, the review of the Transparency Register for lobby groups in the Union institutions, and urges the Commission and the agencies to implement measures stemming from that review concerning potential conflicts of interest;
v zvezi s tem pozdravlja pregled registra za preglednost za skupine lobistov v institucijah Unije ter poziva Komisijo in agencije, naj začnejo izvajati ukrepe na področju morebitnega navzkrižja interesov, navedene v tem pregledu;
Welcomes the Commission’s foreseen action on conflicts of interest and, in particular, its intention to come up with guidelines for a coherent policy on the prevention and management of conflicts of interest for members of the management boards and directors, experts in scientific committees, and members of boards of appeal [9], a task for which the Commission itself takes responsibility and has set 2013 as the target year;
pozdravlja ukrepe v zvezi z navzkrižjem interesov, ki jih je napovedala Komisija, zlasti pripravo smernic za skladno politiko preprečevanja in obravnavanja navzkrižja interesov za člane upravnih odborov in direktorje, strokovnjake v znanstvenih odborih in člane odborov za pritožbe [9], pri čemer gre za nalogo, za katero je odgovornost prevzela Komisija in jo uvrstila med cilje za leto 2013;
notes with satisfaction that this task is one of the Commission’s priority actions and milestones;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je ta naloga tudi eden od prednostnih ukrepov in mejnikov Komisije;
urges the Commission to respect the proposed deadline to implement this action and to report to the discharge authority on its outcome before the end of 2013, attaching to its report the relevant legislative proposals;
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva predlagani rok za izvedbo tega ukrepa, organu za podelitev razrešnice pa naj pred iztekom leta 2013 posreduje poročilo o doseženih rezultatih ter priloži ustrezne zakonodajne predloge;
Notes that, in this regard, the Commission foresees two actions to be undertaken by the agencies in 2013, namely, to adopt and implement a clear policy on conflicts of interest and, in particular, exchange experience and possibly develop a coordinated approach to common problems concerning scientific committees and boards of appeal, and define transparent and objectively verifiable criteria for the impartiality and independence of the members of boards of appeal, and to review selection procedures for members of scientific committees [10];
ugotavlja, da Komisija za leto 2013 predvideva dva ukrepa, ki naj bi ju uvedle agencije, in sicer „sprejetje in izvajanje jasnih pravil za navzkrižje interesov, še zlasti izmenjava izkušenj in morebitno oblikovanje usklajenega pristopa k skupnim težavam v zvezi z znanstvenimi in pritožbenimi odbori, ter opredelitev preglednih in objektivno preverljivih meril za nepristranskost in neodvisnost članov pritožbenih odborov“, pa tudi „pregled izbirnih postopkov za člane znanstvenih odborov“ [10];
urges the agencies to report to the discharge authority on the state of play as regards those tasks before the end of 2013;
poziva agencije, naj organu za podelitev razrešnice še pred iztekom leta 2013 poročajo o napredku pri izvajanju teh nalog;
Invites the Commission to bear in mind the need to maintain an adequate balance between risks/benefits as regards the management of conflicts of interest, on one hand, and the objective to obtain the best possible scientific advice, on the other;
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva dejstvo, da je treba ohraniti ustrezno ravnovesje med tveganji in koristmi, zlasti pri upravljanju navzkrižja interesov na eni strani in cilja, da je treba pridobiti najboljše možno znanstveno mnenje, na drugi strani;
considers that the proliferation of codes of conduct and ethical guidelines cannot rule out conflicts of interest;
meni, da s širjenjem kodeksov ravnanja in etičnih smernic ni mogoče izključiti navzkrižja interesov;
takes the view that the adoption of codes of conduct and ethical guidelines is necessary, but not sufficient, and that the eradication of conflicts of interest can only be achieved through the implementation of simple and appropriate rules, and their effective enforcement, as part of a general culture of honesty, integrity and transparency;
prav tako meni, da je sprejetje kodeksov ravnanja in etičnih smernic sicer potrebno, ne pa tudi zadostno, in da je mogoče navzkrižje interesov izkoreniniti le z uvedbo in učinkovitim izvajanjem enostavnih in ustreznih pravil, in sicer kot del splošnega duha iskrenosti, poštenosti in preglednosti;
Reiterates the fact that a high level of transparency is a key element to mitigate risks of conflict of interest;
znova poudarja dejstvo, da je čim večja preglednost ključnega pomena za zmanjšanje tveganja navzkrižja interesov;
calls therefore on the agencies that have not yet done so to make available on their websites the list of their management boards’ members, management staff and external and in-house experts, together with their respective declarations of interests and curriculum vitae;
zato poziva agencije, ki tega še niso naredile, naj na svojih spletnih mestih objavijo seznam članov upravnega odbora, vodstvenih delavcev ter zunanjih in notranjih strokovnjakov, skupaj z njihovimi izjavami o interesih in življenjepisi;
Roadmap
Časovni načrt
Welcomes the Roadmap on the follow-up to the Common Approach on EU decentralised agencies (‘the Roadmap’), adopted by the Commission in December 2012, and invites all involved parties to take on board the ideas expressed thereon, in particular in the context of the ongoing negotiations on the multiannual financial framework (MFF);
pozdravlja časovni načrt za ukrepanje na osnovi skupnega pristopa za decentralizirane agencije EU, ki ga je Komisija sprejela decembra 2012, in poziva vse udeležene strani, naj upoštevajo tam predstavljene zamisli, zlasti med pogajanji o novem večletnem finančnem okviru;
Fully supports the Commission’s main objectives set out in the Roadmap, namely, achieving more balanced governance, enhancing the agencies’ efficiency and accountability and introducing greater coherence in the way they function;
v celoti podpira glavne cilje Komisije, opredeljene v časovnem načrtu, tj. doseči bolj uravnoteženo upravljanje, povečati učinkovitost in odgovornost agencij ter doseči večjo skladnost delovanja;
welcomes the actions proposed thereon, in particular regarding the streamlining of management boards, efforts to seek synergies between agencies and the possibility of merging some of them;
pozdravlja predlagane ukrepe, zlasti za racionalizacijo upravnih odborov, prizadevanja za sinergije med agencijami in morebitno združitev nekaterih agencij;
Notes, however, that the Roadmap, while being a good starting point, still lacks a comprehensive assessment of the current agencies landscape, as well as a clear vision and strategy addressing the need to modernise the agencies;
kljub temu ugotavlja, da je časovni načrt sicer dobra izhodiščna točka, vendar ne ponuja celovite ocene trenutnega položaja, v katerem so agencije, pa tudi ne jasne vizije in strategije za njihovo modernizacijo, ki je potrebna;
believes that the Commission could have been more ambitious and demanding when it comes to specific actions targeting individual agencies or types or groups of agencies;
meni, da bi bila lahko Komisija odločnejša in zahtevnejša glede specifičnih ukrepov za posamezne agencije oziroma vrste in skupine agencij;
regrets that the lengthy work of the Interinstitutional Working Group has led to a rather modest outcome at this stage, and that the Council has not shown openness to a more ambitious approach;
obžaluje, da je dolgotrajno delo medinstitucionalne delovne skupine v tej fazi prineslo bolj skromne rezultate in da Svet ni bil naklonjen bolj velikopoteznemu pristopu;
is convinced that a more proactive and forward looking approach would have led to a more considerable added value;
je prepričan, da bi bolj proaktiven in v prihodnost usmerjen pristop privedel k precej večji dodani vrednosti;
Welcomes the fact that one of the priorities of the Common Approach is to improve the governance of the agencies, in particular by defining more clearly the roles of the management board and the executive director, and by reviewing the remit of Commission and Parliament representatives on the governing boards;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je ena od prednostnih nalog skupnega pristopa izboljšati upravljanje agencij, zlasti z natančnejšo opredelitvijo vloge upravnega odbora in izvršnega direktorja in s pregledom pristojnosti predstavnikov Komisije in Parlamenta v upravnih odborih;
takes the view that this process will also help to clarify the agencies’ relationship with the Union institutions and Member States, to establish enhanced accountability mechanisms for the agencies and to define the Commission’s degree of responsibility in respect of the agencies’ activities, whilst respecting the principle of the agencies’ independence;
meni, da bo s tem postopkom prav tako mogoče razjasniti odnose med agencijami ter institucijami Unije in državami članicami, vzpostaviti boljše mehanizme odgovornosti agencij in opredeliti stopnjo odgovornosti Komisije za dejavnosti agencij, pri čemer pa je treba upoštevati načelo neodvisnosti agencij;
Calls on the Commission to better use the capacity building and the recommendations of agencies in the framework of the European Semester, notably when elaborating the Annual Growth Survey and macroeconomic indicators;
poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru evropskega semestra bolje uporabi gradnjo zmogljivosti in priporočila agencij, zlasti pri pripravi letne strategije rasti in makroekonomskih kazalnikov;
underlines the key role of the agencies in achieving the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy;
poudarja, da agencije igrajo osrednjo vlogo pri uresničevanju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020;
Stresses the utmost importance of the agencies’ independence;
poudarja, da je neodvisnost agencij izjemnega pomena;
recalls that the agencies should be able to independently execute their mandate and regrets that this is not always the case currently;
opominja, da bi morale agencije neodvisno uresničevati svoje poslanstvo, in obžaluje, da sedaj ni vedno tako;
believes that the Commission’s Directorates General should be seen as partners of the agencies, and notes with concern that the Commission’s interventions at times cast doubt on the objectivity of the agencies’ decisions and performed actions, especially when high risks are involved regarding the safety of consumers;
meni, da bi morali generalni direktorati Komisije delovati kot partnerji agencij, in z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da posredovanje Komisije včasih meče senco dvoma na nepristranskost odločitev in ukrepov agencij, zlasti ko je tveganje za varnost potrošnikov veliko;
Considers that the democratic accountability of the agencies should be streamlined, mainly as regards their way of reporting to the discharge authority (there are, in particular, inconsistencies in the presentation of financial information and in the submission of discharge follow-up reports);
meni, da bi bilo treba demokratično odgovornost agencij poenostaviti, zlasti način poročanja organu za podelitev razrešnice (še vedno na primer obstajajo nedoslednosti v načinu predstavitve finančnih podatkov in pri posredovanju poročil o nadaljnjih ukrepih na podlagi razrešnice);
believes that the relationship between Parliament and the agencies would benefit from a stronger and better structured system of reporting to Parliament;
meni, da bi se odnosi med Parlamentom in agencijami izboljšali, če bi uvedli boljši in bolj strukturiran sistem poročanja Parlamentu;
considers that the current situation is rather fragmented and that contact and reporting takes place too often only on an ad-hoc basis;
meni, da je trenutna situacija precej neenotna, stiki in poročanje pa prepogosto potekajo samo priložnostno;
Considers it vital for the parliamentary committees responsible for the agencies to scrutinise their annual work programmes as closely as possible and to ensure that they reflect current circumstances and political priorities;
meni, da je izjemno pomembno, da parlamentarni odbori, pristojni za agencije, kolikor mogoče natančno preverijo letne delovne programe agencij ter jih prilagodijo aktualnim razmeram in političnim prednostnim nalogam;
expects, in that respect, the agencies to cooperate closely with those committees and the Commission, in line with the Joint Statement of 19 July 2012 on decentralised agencies, when drafting their annual work programmes;
v zvezi s tem pričakuje, da bodo agencije pri pripravi letnih delovnih programov tesno sodelovale z odbori in s Komisijo, v skladu s skupno izjavo o decentraliziranih agencijah z dne 19. julija 2012;
Asks the agencies to publish the minutes of their management board meetings on their websites, in the interests of transparency and democratic scrutiny, including by Parliament;
poziva agencije, naj na spletnih mestih objavljajo zapisnike s sestankov upravnega odbora, saj je to v interesu preglednosti in demokratičnega nadzora, tudi parlamentarnega;
Suggests that a member of Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control should be able to attend agencies’ management board meetings as an observer;
predlaga, da bi se članu Odbora za proračunski nadzor v Parlamentu omogočilo prisostvovanje na sestankih upravnih odborov agencij, kjer bi imel vlogo opazovalca;
Possibilities of closer cooperation and of merging certain agencies
Možnosti za tesnejše sodelovanje in združitev nekaterih agencij
Believes that further synergies should be explored between the European Police College and the European Police Office, taking into account the results of the study issued by CEPOL in 2011 (contract CEPOL/CT/2010/002);
meni, da bi bilo treba preučiti dodatne sinergije med Evropsko policijsko akademijo in Evropskim policijskim uradom, pri tem pa upoštevati ugotovitve študije, ki jo je izdala akademija leta 2011(št. pogodbe CEPOL/CT/2010/002);
notes that in March 2014, the College is to leave its current premises in Bramshill (UK);
je seznanjen s tem, da bo akademija marca 2014 zapustila svoje sedanje prostore v Bramshillu (UK);
requests that the Commission presents a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council for the relocation of the College to The Hague (NL), where the European Police Office is currently located, in order for both agencies to be able to share facilities and services without jeopardizing their core tasks and autonomy;
zahteva, da Komisija za Evropski parlament in Svet pripravi predlog za preselitev akademije v Haag (NL), kjer ima trenutno sedež Evropski policijski urad, da bi si agenciji delili zmogljivosti in storitve, ne da bi bile pri tem ogrožene njune glavne naloge in samostojnost;
stresses that a swift decision on the relocation of CEPOL would considerably reduce the level of uncertainty which can adversely affect staff and recruitment procedures;
poudarja, da bi hitra odločitev o preselitvi akademije precej zmanjšala negotovost, ki bi lahko negativno vplivala na osebje in postopke zaposlovanja;
Invites the Commission to further explore, together with the European Training Foundation, the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions and the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, the synergies that exist between those agencies and to report to the discharge authority on their possible deeper integration;
poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z Evropsko fundacijo za usposabljanje, Evropskim centrom za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja, Evropsko fundacijo za izboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer ter Evropsko agencijo za varnost in zdravje pri delu nadalje razišče sinergije, ki obstajajo med temi agencijami, in organu za podelitev razrešnice poroča o možnostih za tesnejše povezave med njimi;
Considers that closer coordination should be put in place between certain agencies, in particular as regards decisions impacting on the remit of another agency;
meni, da bi morale nekatere agencije začeti tesneje sodelovati med seboj, zlasti ko gre za odločitve, ki vplivajo na področje delovanja drugih agencij;
proposes that the agencies concerned reach an agreement among themselves, with the involvement of the relevant stakeholders, in order to avoid competing legislation;
predlaga, da zadevne agencije same dosežejo dogovor, pri tem pa se posvetujejo z ustreznimi interesnimi skupinami, da ne bodo sprejeti nasprotujoči si zakoni;
calls on the agencies, in such cases, to inform the Parliament committees responsible at all times;
poziva agencije, naj v takšnih primerih vedno obvestijo pristojni odbor Parlamenta;
Sharing best practices
Izmenjava praktičnih zgledov
Stresses the need to ensure that newly-formed agencies (e.g. the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), all founded in 2011) benefit from best practices of older and more experienced ones, in order to avoid recruitment, procurement and financial regulation shortcomings;
poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da bodo nove agencije (npr. Agencija za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev, Evropski bančni organ (EBA), Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine (EIOPA) in Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge (ESMA), vse ustanovljene leta 2011) lahko izkoristile najboljšo prakso starejših, bolj uveljavljenih agencij, da bi se izognile pomanjkljivostim pri zaposlovanju, javnih naročilih in izvajanju finančne uredbe;
Notes with satisfaction that newly formed agencies are participating in the Network’s meetings three times a year and that those meetings comprise sharing best practices;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da nove agencije sodelujejo na srečanjih mreže trikrat letno in da na teh srečanjih poteka tudi izmenjava praktičnih zgledov;
notes, furthermore, that newly established agencies are invited to sub-networks which are set up to discuss issues requiring technical knowledge, in particular the sub-network of the Heads of Administration, which meets with the same frequency as the Network and deals with issues of recruitment, procurement and financial regulations;
prav tako ugotavlja, da so bile nove agencije povabljene k sodelovanju v podmrežah, ki se ustanavljajo za razpravo o vprašanjih, ki zahtevajo tehnično znanje, zlasti v podmreži vodij uprav, ki se srečuje tako pogosto kot mreža in se posveča vprašanjem zaposlovanja, javnih naročil in finančnih pravil;