natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 32(5) first subparagraph of Directive 2010/75/EU, the Kingdom of Spain submitted to the Commission a transitional national plan (TNP) by e-mail on 21 December 2012 [2] and by official letter dated 28 December 2012, which was received by the Commission on 2 January 2013 [3].
Kraljevina Španija je v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 32(5) Direktive 2010/75/EU Komisiji poslala prehodni nacionalni načrt (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PNN) po elektronski pošti 21. decembra 2012 [2] in v uradnem dopisu z dne 28. decembra 2012, ki ga je Komisija prejela 2. januarja 2013 [3].
The TNP has been assessed in accordance with Article 32(1), (3) and (4) of Directive 2010/75/EU and with Commission Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU [4].
PNN je bil ocenjen v skladu s členom 32(1), (3) in (4) Direktive 2010/75/EU ter Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2012/115/EU [4].
During its assessment of the completeness of the TNP submitted by the Kingdom of Spain, the Commission found that many plants included in the TNP did not match with the plants reported in the 2009 emission inventory submitted by the Kingdom of Spain in accordance with Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Komisija je med oceno popolnosti PNN, ki ga je predložila Kraljevina Španija, ugotovila, da se številne naprave, vključene v PNN, niso ujemale z napravami iz popisa emisij za leto 2009, ki ga je Kraljevina Španija predložila v skladu z Direktivo 2001/80/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5].
The Commission also found that for plant 5 the contribution to the TNP ceiling for SO2 for the period 2001–2007 was calculated on the basis of the minimum desulphurisation rate, and for the period 2008–2010 that contribution was determined by the emission limit value method, while the conditions to use this approach were not fulfilled.
Komisija je tudi ugotovila, da je bil prispevek naprave 5 k zgornji meji za SO2 iz PNN za obdobje 2001–2007 izračunan na podlagi minimalne stopnje razžveplanja in da je bil prispevek za obdobje 2008–2010 določen z metodo mejne vrednosti emisij, vendar pogoji za uporabo tega pristopa niso bili izpolnjeni.
As the discrepancies between the data in the TNP and in the emission inventory under Directive 2001/80/EC hampered the assessment of the TNP, the Commission, in its letter of 11 June 2013 [6], requested the Kingdom of Spain to provide clarification for the differences found.
Ker so neskladja med podatki v PNN in podatki v popisu emisij na podlagi Direktive 2001/80/ES ovirala ocenjevanje PNN, je Komisija v dopisu z dne 11. junija 2013 [6] od Kraljevine Španije zahtevala pojasnilo glede ugotovljenih razlik.
The Commission also requested the Kingdom of Spain to recalculate the contribution of plant 5 to the TNP ceiling for SO2.
Komisija je od Kraljevine Španije zahtevala tudi, da ponovno izračuna prispevek naprave 5 k zgornji meji za SO2 iz PNN.
The Kingdom of Spain submitted additional information to the Commission by letter of 28 June 2013 [7], which provided clarification on the differences between the information in the TNP and the 2009 emission inventory under Directive 2001/80/EC.
Kraljevina Španija je Komisiji predložila dodatne informacije v dopisu z dne 28. junija 2013 [7], ki je vseboval pojasnilo glede razlik med informacijami v PNN in informacijami v popisu emisij za leto 2009 na podlagi Direktive 2001/80/ES.
The Kingdom of Spain also stated in that letter that there was no need to revise the contribution of plant 5 to the TNP ceiling for SO2.
Kraljevina Španija je v navedenem dopisu navedla tudi, da ni potrebe po spremembi prispevka naprave 5 k zgornji meji za SO2 iz PNN.
After further assessment of the TNP and the additional information submitted by the Kingdom of Spain, the Commission sent a second letter to the Kingdom of Spain on 19 September 2013 [8], in which it confirmed its position as regards the use of the minimum desulphurisation rate method for calculating the contribution of plant 5 to the TNP ceilings for SO2.
Po dodatni oceni PNN in dodatnih informacijah, ki jih je predložila Kraljevina Španija, je Komisija 19. septembra 2013 [8] Kraljevini Španiji poslala drugi dopis, v katerem je potrdila svoje stališče glede uporabe metode minimalne stopnje razžveplanja za izračun prispevka naprave 5 k zgornji meji za SO2 iz PNN.
The Commission further remarked that for plant 2 the Kingdom of Spain had used an emission limit value for SO2 of 800 mg/Nm3 to calculate the plant’s contribution to the TNP ceiling for 2016, on the basis of the provisions of Article 5(2) of Directive 2001/80/EC, which the Commission considered not to be applicable for this purpose.
Nadalje je Komisija pripomnila, da je Kraljevina Španija v primeru naprave 2 za izračun prispevka naprave k zgornji meji iz PNN za leto 2016 uporabila mejno vrednost emisij SO2 v višini 800 mg/Nm3 na podlagi določb iz člena 5(2) Direktive 2001/80/ES, ki pa se po mnenju Komisije ne uporablja v ta namen.
The Commission also noted that for nine plants an emission limit value for NOx of 1200 mg/Nm3 was used to calculate their contribution to the TNP ceiling for 2016, on the basis of Note 2 to Table C.1 in Appendix C of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU, but no information on the volatile content of the solid fuel used in these plants had been provided, which would justify the application of that Note.
Komisija je tudi ugotovila, da je bila v primeru devetih naprav za izračun njihovega prispevka k zgornji meji iz PNN za leto 2016 uporabljena mejna vrednost emisij NOx v višini 1200 mg/Nm3 na podlagi opombe 2 k preglednici C.1 iz Dodatka C k Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2012/115/EU, informacije o vsebnosti hlapnih snovi v trdnem gorivu, ki se uporablja v teh napravah, ki bi upravičile uporabo navedene opombe, pa niso bile predložene.
In its letter of 30 September 2013 [9], supplemented by letter of 10 October 2013 [10], the Kingdom of Spain replied to the questions of the Commission and provided additional data.
Kraljevina Španija je odgovorila na vprašanja Komisije in predložila dodatne podatke v dopisu z dne 30. septembra 2013 [9], dopolnjenem z dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2013 [10].
For plant 2, the Kingdom of Spain reiterated its view that there was no need to change the SO2 emission limit value used as it considered that Article 5(2) of Directive 2001/80/EC was applicable in this respect.
Glede naprave 2 je Kraljevina Španija ponovno izrazila svoje stališče, da ni potrebe po spremembi uporabljene mejne vrednosti emisij SO2, saj po njenem mnenju v tem primeru velja člen 5(2) Direktive 2001/80/ES.
For plant 5, the Kingdom of Spain continued to argue that it was entitled to use a combination of the minimum desulphurisation rate method and the emission limit value method.
Glede naprave 5 je Kraljevina Španija še naprej trdila, da je bila upravičena do uporabe kombinacije metode minimalne stopnje razžveplanja in metode mejne vrednosti emisij.
The Kingdom of Spain provided information concerning the volatile content of the solid fuel used in the period 2001-2010 by the nine plants for which a NOx emission limit value of 1200 mg/Nm3 had been applied to calculate the 2016 ceiling, which showed that only for plants 3, 4 and 19 the average annual volatile content of the solid fuel used was below 10 % in each of the years between 2001 and 2010, while for the plants 13, 15, 17, 18, 24 and 25 the average annual level was exceeding 10 % during one or more years.
Kraljevina Španija je predložila informacije o vsebnosti hlapnih snovi v trdnem gorivu, uporabljenem v obdobju 2001–2010 pri devetih napravah, za katere je bila za izračun zgornje meje za leto 2016 uporabljena mejna vrednost emisij NOx v višini 1200 mg/Nm3, ki so pokazale, da je samo v primeru naprav 3, 4 in 19 povprečna letna vsebnost hlapnih spojin v uporabljenem trdnem gorivu znašala manj kot 10 % vsako leto v obdobju med letoma 2001 in 2010, medtem ko je bila povprečna letna vsebnost v primeru naprav 13, 15, 17, 18, 24 in 25 večja od 10 % eno ali več let.
The Kingdom of Spain argued that for all nine plants the average value of the volatile content over the whole reference period (2001-2010) was below the value mentioned in Note 2 to Table C.1 in Appendix C of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU.
Kraljevina Španija je trdila, da je bila povprečna vsebnost hlapnih spojin v primeru vseh devetih naprav v celotnem referenčnem obdobju (2001–2010) nižja od vrednosti, navedene v opombi 2 k preglednici C.1 iz Dodatka C k Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2012/115/EU.
Based on the information received from the Spanish authorities on 30 September 2013 and 10 October 2013, the Commission noted that for multiple fuel types plants, for which emission limit values for all fuels fired have been provided, and for one plant for which emission limit value averaged for all fuels fired has been provided, it is necessary to clarify how the contributions to the total ceilings from those plants were calculated, specifying the emission limit values and the average annual waste gas flow rates used for each fuel fired in those plants.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih 30. septembra 2013 in 10. oktobra 2013 predložile španske oblasti, je Komisija ugotovila, da je v primeru naprav, ki uporabljajo več vrst goriva in za katere so bile predložene mejne vrednosti emisij za vsa uporabljena goriva, ter ene naprave, za katero je bila predložena povprečna mejna vrednost emisij za vsa uporabljena goriva, treba pojasniti, kako so bili izračunani prispevki navedenih naprav k skupnim zgornjim mejam, ter določiti mejne vrednosti emisij in povprečne letne stopnje pretoka odpadnih plinov za vsako gorivo, ki se uporablja v navedenih napravah.
After the final assessment of the TNP notified by the Kingdom of Spain, as amended in accordance with the additional information and including the large combustion plants listed in Annex I to this decision, the Commission identified three main elements as not being in compliance with the applicable provisions, as follows:
Po končni oceni PNN, ki ga je priglasila Kraljevina Španija in kakor je bil spremenjen v skladu z dodatnimi informacijami in vključitvijo velikih kurilnih naprav iz Priloge I k temu sklepu, je Komisija opredelila tri glavne elemente kot neskladne z veljavnimi določbami:
in case of plant 2: the Commission considers the application of the emission limit value of 800 mg/Nm3 for SO2 for calculating its contribution to the 2016 TNP ceiling on the basis of Article 5(2) of Directive 2001/80/EC, as that emission limit value is not referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 32(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU, as not appropriate;
v primeru naprave 2 Komisija meni, da uporaba mejne vrednosti emisij SO2 v višini 800 mg/Nm3 za izračun njenega prispevka k zgornji meji iz PNN za leto 2016 na podlagi člena 5(2) Direktive 2001/80/ES ni primerna, saj se drugi pododstavek člena 32(3) Direktive 2010/75/EU na navedeno mejno vrednost emisij ne nanaša,
in case of plant 5: the Commission considers the method of calculating its contribution to the TNP ceiling for SO2, combining the minimum desulphurisation rate approach and the emission limit value approach, as not appropriate;
v primeru naprave 5 Komisija meni, da metoda za izračun njenega prispevka k zgornji meji za SO2 iz PNN s kombinacijo pristopa minimalne stopnje razžveplanja in pristopa mejne vrednosti emisij ni primerna,
in case of plants 13, 15, 17, 18, 24 and 25: the Commission considers the application of the emission limit value of 1200 mg/Nm3 for NOx for calculating their contribution to the 2016 TNP ceiling, as the conditions to apply this emission limit value, which are set out in Note 2 of Table C1 to Appendix C of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU, are not fulfilled, as not appropriate.
v primeru naprav 13, 15, 17, 18, 24 in 25 Komisija meni, da uporaba mejne vrednosti emisij Nox v višini 1200 mg/Nm3 za izračun njihovih prispevkov k zgornji meji iz PNN za leto 2016 ni ustrezna, saj pogoji za uporabo te mejne vrednosti emisij, ki so določeni v opombi 2 k preglednici C.1 iz Dodatka C k Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2012/115/EU, niso izpolnjeni.
In addition, the Commission identified several plants in the TNP where the information is still inconsistent and/or missing data need to be supplemented.
Poleg tega je Komisija ugotovila, da v primeru več naprav v PNN informacije še vedno niso skladne in/ali da je treba dopolniti manjkajoče podatke.
The full list of missing data and requests for clarification is included in Annex II to this decision.
Popoln seznam manjkajočih podatkov in zahtev za pojasnilo je vključen v Prilogo II k temu sklepu.
Hence, the TNP notified by the Kingdom of Spain should not be accepted.
Zato se PNN, ki ga je priglasila Kraljevina Španija, ne bi smel sprejeti –
The transitional national plan which the Kingdom of Spain notified to the Commission pursuant to Article 32(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU on 14 December 2012, which includes the large combustion plants listed in Annex I to this decision, is not in accordance with the requirements laid down in Article 32(1), (3) and (4) of Directive 2010/75/EU and in Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU, and shall, therefore, not be accepted.
Prehodni nacionalni načrt, ki ga je Kraljevina Španija priglasila Komisiji v skladu s členom 32(5) Direktive 2010/75/EU 14. decembra 2012 in ki vključuje velike kurilne naprave iz Priloge I k temu sklepu, ni skladen z zahtevami iz člena 32(1), (3) in (4) Direktive 2010/75/EU ter Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/115/EU in se zato ne sprejme.
If the Kingdom of Spain intends to implement a transitional national plan pursuant to Article 32(5), it shall take all necessary measures to address, in a revised version of the plan, the following elements:
Če Kraljevina Španija namerava izvajati prehodni nacionalni načrt v skladu s členom 32(5), mora sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za obravnavo naslednjih elementov v revidirani različici načrta:
for plant 2, to correct the emission limit value applied for calculating its contribution to the SO2 ceiling for 2016; the plant is not eligible for using the emission limit value of 800 mg/Nm3 for SO2 for calculating its contribution to the 2016 TNP ceiling on the basis of Article 5(2) of Directive 2001/80/EC, as that emission limit value is not referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 32(3) of Directive 2010/75/EU;
v primeru naprave 2 mora popraviti mejno vrednost emisij, uporabljeno za izračun njenega prispevka k zgornji meji za SO2 za leto 2016; naprava ni upravičena do uporabe mejne vrednosti emisij SO2 v višini 800 mg/Nm3 za izračun njenega prispevka k zgornji meji iz PNN za leto 2016 na podlagi člena 5(2) Direktive 2001/80/ES, saj se drugi pododstavek člena 32(3) Direktive 2010/75/EU ne nanaša na navedeno mejno vrednost emisij;
for plant 5, to correct the method applied for calculating its contribution to the 2016 TNP ceiling for SO2; that contribution shall be calculated for the entire period 2001-2010 either on the basis of the minimum desulphurisation rate, or on the basis of the emission limit values;
v primeru naprave 5 mora popraviti metodo za izračun njenega prispevka k zgornji meji za SO2 iz PNN za leto 2016; navedeni prispevek se izračuna za celotno obdobje 2001–2010 na podlagi minimalne stopnje razžveplanja ali mejnih vrednosti emisij;
for plants 13, 15, 17, 18, 24 and 25: to correct the emission limit values applied for calculating their contribution to the NOx ceiling for 2016; in order for the plants to be eligible for using the emission limit value of 1200 mg/Nm3, the Kingdom of Spain shall demonstrate that the average annual volatile content of the solid fuel used in the plants was below 10 % in the reference years considered for the TNP;
v primeru naprav 13, 15, 17, 18, 24 in 25 mora popraviti mejne vrednosti emisij, uporabljene za izračun njihovega prispevka k zgornji meji za NOx za leto 2016; da bi bile naprave upravičene do uporabe mejne vrednosti emisij v višini 1200 mg/Nm3, mora Kraljevina Španija dokazati, da je povprečna letna vsebnost hlapnih spojin v uporabljenem trdnem gorivu v referenčnih letih za PNN znašala manj kot 10 %;
to correctly update the total emission ceilings for all years calculated in accordance with the corrected values mentioned in the previous points;
pravilno mora posodobiti zgornje meje skupnih emisij za vsa leta, izračunane v skladu s popravljenimi vrednostmi iz prejšnjih točk;
to clarify all issues and complement the data as mentioned in Annex II to this decision.
pojasniti mora vsa vprašanja in dopolniti podatke, kot je navedeno v Prilogi II k temu sklepu.
Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants (OJ L 309, 27.11. 2001, p. 1).
Direktiva 2001/80/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o omejevanju emisij nekaterih onesnaževal v zrak iz velikih kurilnih naprav (UL L 309, 27.11.2001, str. 1).
LIST OF PLANTS INCLUDED IN THE TNP
SEZNAM NAPRAV, VKLJUČENIH V PNN
Plant name in the TNP
Ime naprave v PNN
LIST OF DATA REFERRED TO IN POINT (E) OF ARTICLE 1(2)
SEZNAM PODATKOV IZ TOČKE (E) ČLENA 1(2)
For plant 6 which uses a desulphurisation rate of 92 % in 2016: clarification shall be provided if conditions for application of this value as set in table C3 to Appendix C of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU are met (a contract for fitting a flue gas desulphurisation or a lime injection equipment has entered into effect, and work on its installation has commenced, before 1 January 2001).
Za napravo 6 s stopnjo razžveplanja v višini 92 % za leto 2016: predloži se pojasnilo o tem, ali so izpolnjeni pogoji za uporabo te vrednosti, kot so določeni v preglednici C.3 iz Dodatka C k Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2012/115/EU (sklenjena pogodba o namestitvi naprav za razžveplanje odpadnih plinov ali dodajanje apna in začetek del za namestitev naprave pred 1. januarjem 2001).
For plants 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30 and 34: clarification shall be provided on how the contributions from those plants were calculated to the total TNP ceilings.
Za naprave 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30 in 34: predloži se pojasnilo o načinu izračuna prispevkov navedenih naprav k skupnim zgornjim mejam iz PNN.
For plant 34: data on the waste gas flow rates for each fuel fired in this plant shall be provided separately.
Za napravo 34: podatki o stopnjah pretoka odpadnih plinov se predložijo za vsako gorivo, uporabljeno v tej napravi, posebej.
The Commission also requested additional information from the Kingdom of Spain about the measures foreseen for each of the plants included in the TNP in order to ensure timely compliance with the emission limit values that will be applicable from 1 July 2020.
Komisija je od Kraljevine Španije zahtevala tudi dodatne informacije o ukrepih, predvidenih za vsako napravo, vključeno v PNN, da bi se zagotovila pravočasna uskladitev z mejnimi vrednostmi emisij, ki se bodo uporabljale od 1. julija 2020.
The Commission finally requested the Kingdom of Spain to provide additional data for plants firing multiple fuels or consisting of different plant types concerning the amount of fuels used, emission limit values, average waste gas flow rates and conversion factors for each of the fuels used or each of the plant types separately.
Kot zadnje je Komisija od Kraljevine Španije zahtevala, da predloži dodatne podatke o napravah, ki uporabljajo več vrst goriva ali so sestavljene iz različnih vrst naprav, v zvezi s količino uporabljenih goriv, mejnimi vrednostmi emisij, povprečnimi stopnjami pretoka odpadnih plinov in pretvorbenimi faktorji za vsako uporabljeno gorivo ali vsako vrsto naprav posebej.
Compostilla I (G2 and 3)
Compostilla I (G2 in 3)
Compostilla I (G4 and 5)
Compostilla I (G4 in 5)
on a Union financial contribution for 2013 to cover expenditure incurred by Germany, Spain, France, the Netherlands and Portugal for the purposes of combating organisms harmful to plants or plant products
o finančnem prispevku Unije za leto 2013 za kritje odhodkov, ki so jih imele Francija, Nemčija, Nizozemska, Portugalska in Španija v boju proti organizmom, škodljivim za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode
(notified under document C(2013) 8999)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 8999)
(Only the Dutch, French German, Portuguese and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v francoskem, nemškem, nizozemskem, portugalskem in španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community [1], and in particular Article 23(5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/29/ES z dne 8. maja 2000 o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti [1], ter zlasti člena 23(5) in (6) Direktive,
Pursuant to Article 22 of Directive 2000/29/EC, Member States may receive a ‘plant health control’ financial contribution from the Union to cover expenditure relating directly to the necessary measures which have been taken or are planned to be taken for the purpose of combating harmful organisms introduced from third countries or from other areas in the Union, in order to eradicate or, if that is not possible, to contain them.
V skladu s členom 22 Direktive 2000/29/ES se lahko državam članicam dodeli finančni prispevek Unije za „zdravje rastlin“ za kritje odhodkov, neposredno povezanih z nujnimi ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti ali so načrtovani za boj proti škodljivim organizmom, vnesenim iz tretjih držav ali drugih območij v Unijo, da se jih izkorenini ali, če to ni mogoče, prepreči njihovo širjenje.
Spain introduced four requests for financial contribution on 17 April 2013.
Španija je 17. aprila 2013 predložila štiri zahtevke za finančni prispevek.
The first one relates to measures of intensified inspections taken in 2012 in the four Autonomous Communities bordering Portugal to control Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.
Prvi se je nanašal na ukrepe okrepljenega inšpekcijskega pregleda, sprejete leta 2012 v štirih avtonomnih skupnostih ob meji s Portugalsko, za obvladovanje organizma Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.
France introduced two requests for financial contribution on 30 April 2013.
Francija je 30. aprila 2013 predložila dva zahtevka za finančni prispevek.
The Netherlands introduced one request for financial contribution on 30 April 2013.
Nizozemska je 30. aprila 2013 predložila en zahtevek za finančni prispevek.
Portugal introduced two requests for financial contribution on 30 April 2013 relating to measures taken to control Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.
Portugalska je 30. aprila 2013 predložila dva zahtevka za finančni prispevek v zvezi z ukrepi, sprejetimi za obvladovanje organizma Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.
The first request relates to measures taken or planned in 2013 and 2014 in continental Portugal, in the buffer zone at the border with Spain.
Prvi se je nanašal na ukrepe, sprejete ali načrtovane v letih 2013 in 2014 na celinski Portugalski, v varovalnem pasu ob meji s Španiji.
The second request of Portugal concerns exclusively measures of heat treatment of wood or wood packaging material in the area of Setubal, in 2013.
Drugi zahtevek Portugalske se je nanašal izključno na ukrepe toplotne obdelave lesa ali lesene embalaže na območju Setubal v letu 2013.
The measures taken in 2010, 2011 and 2012 have also been the subject of co-financing in 2011and 2012.
Ukrepi, sprejeti v letih 2010, 2011 in 2012, so bili sofinancirani tudi v letih 2011 in 2012.
In their requests, Germany, Spain, France, The Netherlands and Portugal have each established a programme of actions to eradicate or contain the above harmful organisms introduced in their territories.
Nemčija, Španija, Francija, Nizozemska in Portugalska so v zahtevkih opisale programe ukrepov za izkoreninjenje ali preprečevanje širjenja navedenih škodljivih organizmov, ki so bili vneseni na njihova ozemlja.