natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The other requirements of paragraph 1 in Annex II may be relaxed in agreement with the national safety authority in a non-discriminatory way.
Druge zahteve iz odstavka 1 Priloge II se lahko opustijo po dogovoru z nacionalnim varnostnim organom na nediskriminatoren način.
Provision of information to the Agency
Predložitev informacij Agenciji
Where applicable, by no later than 21 May 2015, Member States shall inform the Agency which is their national accreditation body and/or recognition body or recognition bodies for the purposes of this Regulation, as well as of the assessment bodies they recognised in conformity with Article 9(1)(a).
Če je primerno, države članice najpozneje do 21. maja 2015 obvestijo Agencijo, kdo je njihov nacionalni akreditacijski organ in/ali organ za priznavanje ali organi za priznavanje za namene te uredbe in katere ocenjevalne organe so priznale v skladu s členom 9(1)(a).
They shall also notify any change to that situation within one month of the change.
Sporočijo tudi vse spremembe v zvezi s temi organi, in sicer v roku enega meseca po spremembi.
The Agency shall make this information publicly available.
Agencija da te informacije na voljo javnosti.
By no later than 21 May 2015, the national accreditation body shall inform the Agency of the assessment bodies accredited, as well as of the area of competence for which those assessment bodies are accredited as provided for in points 2 and 3 of Annex II.
Nacionalni akreditacijski organ najpozneje do 21. maja 2015 obvesti Agencijo o akreditiranih ocenjevalnih organih kot tudi o področju pristojnosti, za katero so ti ocenjevalni organi akreditirani, kot je določeno v točkah 2 in 3 Priloge II.
They shall also notify any change to that situation within 1 month of the change.
Sporoči tudi vse spremembe v zvezi z navedenim, in sicer v enem mesecu po spremembi.
By no later than 21 May 2015, the recognition body shall inform the Agency of the assessment bodies recognised, as well as of the area of competence for which those assessment bodies are recognised as provided for in points 2 and 3 of Annex II.
Organ za priznavanje najpozneje do 21. maja 2015 obvesti Agencijo o priznanih ocenjevalnih organih kot tudi o področju pristojnosti, za katero so ti ocenjevalni organi priznani, kot je določeno v točkah 2 in 3 Priloge II.
Support from the Agency to accreditation or recognition of the assessment body
Podpora Agencije akreditaciji ali priznanju ocenjevalnega organa
The Agency shall organise peer evaluations between the recognition bodies based on the same principles as set out in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008.
Agencija organizira strokovna vrednotenja med organi za priznavanje, ki temeljijo na enakih načelih, kot so določena v členu 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008.
The Agency shall organise, in collaboration with the European cooperation for Accreditation (EA), training on this Regulation for the national accreditation bodies and for the recognition bodies at least at each new revision of this Regulation.
Agencija v sodelovanju z Evropskim združenjem za akreditacijo (EA) organizira usposabljanje o tej uredbi, namenjeno nacionalnim akreditacijskim organom in organom za priznavanje, najmanj ob vsakem novem pregledu te uredbe.
The assessment body shall provide the proposer with a safety assessment report in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex III.
Ocenjevalni organ predlagatelju predloži poročilo o varnostni oceni v skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge III.
The proposer shall be responsible for determining if and how to take into account the conclusions of the safety assessment report for the safety acceptance of the assessed change.
Predlagatelj je odgovoren za določitev, če in kako je treba upoštevati zaključke poročila o varnostni oceni za namene potrditve varnosti ocenjene spremembe.
The proposer shall justify and document the part of the safety assessment report for which the proposer eventually disagrees.
Predlagatelj upraviči in dokumentira tisti del poročila o varnostni oceni, o katerem se na koncu ne strinja.
In the case referred to in point (b) of Article 2(3), in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article, the declaration referred to in Article 16 shall be accepted by the national safety authority in its decision to authorise the placing in service of structural subsystems and vehicles.
V primeru iz člena 2(3)(b) nacionalni varnostni organ v skladu z odstavkom 5 tega člena sprejme izjavo iz člena 16 pri svoji odločitvi o odobritvi začetka obratovanja strukturnih podsistemov in vozil.
Without prejudice to Article 16 of Directive 2008/57/EC, the national safety authority may not request additional checks or risk analyses unless it is able to demonstrate the existence of a substantial safety risk.
Brez poseganja v člen 16 Direktive 2008/57/ES nacionalni varnostni organ ne sme zahtevati dodatnih preverjanj ali analiz tveganja, razen če lahko dokaže obstoj znatnega varnostnega tveganja.
In the case referred to in point (a) of Article 2(3), in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article, the declaration referred to in Article 16 shall be accepted by the notified body in charge of delivering the conformity certificate, unless it justifies and documents its doubts concerning the assumptions made or the appropriateness of the results.
V primeru iz člena 2(3)(a) priglašeni organ, zadolžen za izdajo spričevala o skladnosti, v skladu z odstavkom 5 tega člena sprejme izjavo iz člena 16, razen če upraviči in dokumentira svoje pomisleke glede predpostavk v zvezi z ustreznostjo rezultatov.
When a system or part of a system has already been accepted following the risk management process specified in this Regulation, the resulting safety assessment report shall not be called into question by any other assessment body in charge of performing a new assessment for the same system.
Če je bil sistem ali del sistema že sprejet na podlagi postopka upravljanja s tveganji iz te uredbe, poročila o varnostni oceni, ki nastane na tej podlagi, ne more izpodbijati noben drug ocenjevalni organ, odgovoren za ponovno ocenjevanje istega sistema.
Mutual recognition shall be conditional upon demonstration that the system will be used under the same functional, operational and environmental conditions as the already accepted system, and that equivalent risk acceptance criteria have been applied.
Pogoj za vzajemno priznavanje je, da se dokaže, da se bo sistem uporabljal pod enakimi funkcionalnimi, operativnimi in okoljskimi pogoji kot že potrjeni sistem ter da so bila pri tem upoštevana enakovredna merila sprejemanja tveganj.
Declaration by the proposer
Izjava predlagatelja
Based on the results of the application of this Regulation and on the safety assessment report provided by the assessment body, the proposer shall produce a written declaration that all identified hazards and associated risks are controlled to an acceptable level.
Na podlagi rezultatov uporabe te uredbe in poročila o varnostni oceni, ki ga je predložil ocenjevalni organ, predlagatelj predloži pisno izjavo, da je nadzor nad vsemi ugotovljenimi nevarnostmi in z njimi povezanimi tveganji na sprejemljivi ravni.
Risk control management and audits
Upravljanje nadzorovanja tveganj in revizije
The railway undertakings and infrastructure managers shall include audits of the application of this Regulation in their recurrent auditing scheme for the safety management system as referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Prevozniki v železniškem prometu in upravljavci infrastrukture v svoje redne programe revizij sistema varnega upravljanja iz člena 9 Direktive 2004/49/ES vključijo tudi revizije uporabe te uredbe.
The entities in charge of maintenance shall include audits of the application of this Regulation in their recurrent auditing scheme for the system of maintenance as referred to in Article 14a(3) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Subjekti, zadolženi za vzdrževanje, v svoje redne programe revizij sistema vzdrževanja iz člena 14a(3) Direktive 2004/49/ES vključijo revizije uporabe te uredbe.
As part of the tasks defined in Article 16(2)(e) of Directive 2004/49/EC, the national safety authority shall supervise the application of this Regulation by railway undertakings, infrastructure managers and the entities in charge of maintenance that do not fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 445/2011 but are identified in its National Vehicle Register.
V okviru nalog iz člena 16(2)(e) Direktive 2004/49/ES nacionalni varnostni organ nadzoruje uporabo te uredbe s strani prevoznikov v železniškem prometu, upravljavcev infrastrukture in subjektov, zadolženih za vzdrževanje, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 445/2011, vendar so opredeljeni v nacionalnem registru vozil.
As part of the tasks defined in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 445/2011, the certification body of an entity in charge of maintenance of freight wagons shall perform surveillance of the application of this Regulation by the entity in charge of maintenance.
V okviru nalog iz člena 7(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 445/2011 certifikacijski organ subjekta, zadolženega za vzdrževanje tovornih vagonov, opravi nadzor uporabe te uredbe s strani subjekta, zadolženega za vzdrževanje.
Each infrastructure manager and each railway undertaking shall, in its annual safety report referred to in Article 9(4) of Directive 2004/49/EC, report briefly on its experience with the application of this Regulation.
Vsak upravljavec železniške infrastrukture in vsak prevoznik v železniškem prometu v svojem letnem varnostnem poročilu iz člena 9(4) Direktive 2004/49/ES kratko poroča o svojih izkušnjah z uporabo te uredbe.
The report shall also include a synthesis of the decisions on the level of significance of the changes.
Poročilo vsebuje tudi sintezo odločitev v zvezi s stopnjo pomembnosti sprememb.
Each national safety authority shall, in its annual safety report referred to in Article 18 of Directive 2004/49/EC, report on the experience of the proposers with the application of this Regulation, and, where appropriate, its own experience.
Vsak nacionalni varnostni organ v svojem letnem varnostnem poročilu iz člena 18 Direktive 2004/49/ES poroča o izkušnjah predlagateljev z uporabo te uredbe, po potrebi pa tudi o svojih lastnih izkušnjah.
The annual maintenance report of entities in charge of maintenance of freight wagons referred to in point I(7)(4)(k) in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 445/2011, shall include information about the experience of entities in charge of maintenance in applying this Regulation.
Letno poročilo o vzdrževanju subjektov, zadolženih za vzdrževanje tovornih vagonov, iz točke I(7)(4)(k) Priloge III k Uredbi (EU) št. 445/2011 vključuje informacije o izkušnjah subjektov, zadolženih za vzdrževanje, pri uporabi te uredbe.
The other entities in charge of maintenance that do not fall within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 445/2011 shall also share their experience with the Agency on the application of this Regulation.
Drugi subjekti, zadolženi za vzdrževanje, ki jih Uredba (EU) št. 445/2011 ne zajema, prav tako z Agencijo delijo svoje izkušnje pri uporabi te uredbe.
The Agency shall coordinate the sharing of experience with these entities in charge of maintenance and with the national safety authorities.
Agencija usklajuje izmenjavo izkušenj s temi subjekti, zadolženimi za vzdrževanje, in z nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi.
The Agency shall collect all information on the experience of the application of this Regulation and shall, when necessary, make recommendations to the Commission with a view to improving this Regulation.
Agencija zbira vse informacije o izkušnjah pri uporabi te uredbe in po potrebi pripravi priporočila za Komisijo z namenom izboljšanja te uredbe.
Before 21 May 2018 the Agency shall submit to the Commission a report containing:
Agencija pred 21. majem 2018 Komisiji predloži poročilo, ki vsebuje:
an analysis of the experience with the application of this Regulation, including cases where the CSM has been applied by proposers on a voluntary basis before the relevant date of application provided for in Article 20;
analizo izkušenj z uporabo te uredbe, vključno s primeri, kjer predlagatelji uporabljajo SVM prostovoljno pred datumom začetka uporabe, določenim v členu 20;
an analysis of the experience of proposers concerning decisions on the level of significance of changes;
analizo izkušenj predlagateljev glede odločitev v zvezi s stopnjo pomembnosti sprememb;
an analysis of the cases where codes of practice have been used as set out in point 2.3.8 of Annex I;
analizo primerov, v katerih je bil uporabljen kodeks ravnanja, kot je opisano v točki 2.3.8 Priloge I;
an analysis of the experience with the accreditation and recognition of assessment bodies;
analizo izkušenj z akreditacijo in priznavanjem ocenjevalnih organov;
an analysis of the overall effectiveness of this Regulation.
analizo splošne učinkovitosti te uredbe.
The national safety authorities shall support the Agency in collecting such information.
Nacionalni varnostni organi pomagajo Agenciji pri zbiranju takih informacij.
Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 is repealed with effect from 21 May 2015.
Uredba (ES) št. 352/2009 se razveljavi z učinkom od 21. maja 2015.
It shall apply from 21 May 2015.
Uporablja se od 21. maja 2015.
The risk management process shall start from a definition of the system under assessment and comprise the following activities:
Postopek upravljanja s tveganji se prične z opredelitvijo sistema, ki se ocenjuje, in vključuje naslednje dejavnosti:
the risk assessment process, which shall identify the hazards, the risks, the associated safety measures and the resulting safety requirements to be fulfilled by the system under assessment;
postopek ocenjevanja tveganja, v katerem se opredelijo nevarnosti, tveganja, z njimi povezani varnostni ukrepi in iz njih izhajajoče varnostne zahteve, ki jih mora izpolnjevati sistem, ki se ocenjuje;
demonstration of the compliance of the system with the identified safety requirements; and
dokaz, da sistem izpolnjuje opredeljene varnostne zahteve, ter
The process ends when compliance of the system with all the safety requirements necessary to accept the risks linked to the identified hazards is demonstrated.
Postopek se konča, ko se dokaže, da sistem izpolnjuje vse varnostne zahteve, potrebne za sprejetje tveganj, ki so povezana z ugotovljenimi nevarnostmi.
The risk management process shall include appropriate quality assurance activities and be carried out by competent staff.
Postopek upravljanja s tveganji obsega ustrezne dejavnosti za zagotavljanje kakovosti, izvaja pa ga pristojno osebje.
It shall be independently assessed by one or more assessment bodies.
Neodvisno ga oceni eden ali več ocenjevalnih organov.
The proposer in charge of the risk management process shall maintain a hazard record in accordance with point 4.
Predlagatelj, ki je odgovoren za postopek upravljanja s tveganji, vodi evidenco nevarnosti v skladu s točko 4.
The actors who already have in place methods or tools for risk assessment may continue to apply them if such methods or tools are compatible with the provisions of this Regulation and subject to the following conditions:
Udeleženci, ki že uporabljajo metode ali orodja za ocenjevanje tveganj, lahko te uporabljajo še naprej, če so te metode ali orodja skladni z določbami te uredbe in naslednjimi pogoji:
the risk assessment methods or tools are described in a safety management system accepted by a national safety authority in accordance with Article 10(2)(a) or Article 11(1)(a) of Directive 2004/49/EC; or
metode ali orodja za ocenjevanje tveganj so opisani v sistemu varnega upravljanja, ki ga je sprejel nacionalni varnostni organ v skladu s členom 10(2)(a) ali členom 11(1)(a) Direktive 2004/49/ES, ali
Without prejudice to civil liability in accordance with the legal requirements of the Member States, the risk assessment process shall fall within the responsibility of the proposer.
Brez poseganja v civilnopravno odgovornost v skladu z zakonskimi zahtevami držav članic je za postopek ocene tveganja odgovoren predlagatelj.
The safety requirements assigned by the proposer to those actors shall not go beyond the scope of their responsibility and domain of control.
Varnostne zahteve, ki jih navedenim udeležencem dodeli predlagatelj, ne smejo presegati obsega njihove odgovornosti in področja nadzora.
The demonstration of compliance with the safety requirements shall be conducted in accordance with point 3.
Dokazovanje skladnosti z varnostnimi zahtevami se izvaja v skladu s točko 3.
The first step of the risk management process shall be to identify in a document, to be drawn up by the proposer, the different actors’ tasks, and their risk management activities.
Prvi korak v postopku upravljanja s tveganji je, da predlagatelj pripravi dokument, v katerem določi naloge različnih udeležencev ter njihove dejavnosti v zvezi z upravljanjem s tveganji.
The proposer is responsible for coordinating close collaboration between the different actors involved, according to their respective tasks, in order to manage the hazards and their associated safety measures.
Predlagatelj je odgovoren za usklajevanje tesnega sodelovanja med različnimi aktivnimi udeleženci glede na njihove naloge, da lahko upravlja z nevarnostmi in z njimi povezanimi varnostnimi ukrepi.
Evaluation of the correct application of the risk management process falls within the responsibility of the assessment body.
Za oceno pravilne uporabe postopka upravljanja s tveganji je odgovoren ocenjevalni organ.
For each interface relevant to the system under assessment and without prejudice to specifications of interfaces defined in relevant TSIs, the rail-sector actors concerned shall cooperate in order to identify and manage jointly the hazards and related safety measures that need to be handled at these interfaces.
Za vsak vmesnik, povezan s sistemom, ki se ocenjuje, in ne glede na specifikacije vmesnikov, opredeljene v ustreznih TSI, zadevni udeleženci v železniškem sektorju sodelujejo z namenom, da bi skupaj določili in upravljali nevarnosti in z njimi povezane varnostne ukrepe, ki jih je treba izvajati na teh vmesnikih.
If, in order to fulfil a safety requirement, an actor identifies the need for a safety measure that it cannot implement itself, it shall, after agreement with another actor, transfer the management of the related hazard to the latter in accordance with the process set out in point 4.
Če udeleženec, ki želi izpolniti varnostne zahteve, ugotovi, da je potreben varnostni ukrep, ki ga ne more izvesti sam, upravljanje zadevne nevarnosti po dogovoru z drugim udeležencem prenese nanj, in sicer v skladu s postopkom iz točke 4.
When agreement cannot be reached between two or more actors it is the responsibility of the proposer to find a solution.
Če se dva ali več udeležencev ne more dogovoriti, mora predlagatelj najti ustrezno rešitev.
When a requirement in a notified national rule cannot be fulfilled by an actor, the proposer shall seek advice from the relevant competent authority.
Če udeleženec ne more izpolniti zahteve iz priglašenega nacionalnega predpisa, se predlagatelj posvetuje z ustreznim pristojnim organom.
Independently from the definition of the system under assessment, the proposer is responsible for ensuring that the risk management covers the system itself and its integration into the railway system as a whole.
Neodvisno od opredelitve sistema, ki se ocenjuje, mora predlagatelj zagotoviti, da upravljanje s tveganji obsega sistem kot tak in njegovo vključitev v celoten železniški sistem.
The risk assessment process shall interact with hazard management in accordance with point 4.1.
Postopek ocenjevanja tveganj poteka skladno z upravljanjem nevarnosti v skladu s točko 4.1.
The system definition shall address at least the following issues:
Pri opredelitvi sistema je treba upoštevati vsaj naslednje vidike:
system objective (intended purpose);
cilj sistema (predvideni namen);
system functions and elements, where relevant (including human, technical and operational elements);
po potrebi funkcije in elemente sistema (vključno s človeškimi, tehničnimi in operativnimi elementi);
physical (interacting systems) and functional (functional input and output) interfaces;
fizične (sisteme, s katerimi poteka interakcija) in funkcionalne (vložek in rezultati) vmesnike;
system environment (for example energy and thermal flow, shocks, vibrations, electromagnetic interference, operational use);
sistemsko okolje (npr. pretok energije, toplotni pretok, sunki, vibracije, elektromagnetna interferenca, funkcionalna uporaba);
existing safety measures and, after the necessary relevant iterations, definition of the safety requirements identified by the risk assessment process;
obstoječe varnostne ukrepe in, v primeru potrebnih zadevnih iteracij, opredelitev varnostnih zahtev, določenih v postopku ocenjevanja tveganja;
assumptions that determine the limits for the risk assessment.
predpostavke, ki določijo meje za oceno tveganja.
A hazard identification shall be carried out on the defined system, in accordance with point 2.2.
Za opredeljeni sistem se opravi ugotavljanje nevarnosti v skladu s točko 2.2.
the application of codes of practice (point 2.3);
uporabo kodeksov ravnanja (točka 2.3);
a comparison with similar systems (point 2.4);
primerjavo s podobnimi sistemi (točka 2.4);
an explicit risk estimation (point 2.5).
eksplicitno oceno tveganja (točka 2.5).
In accordance with the principle referred to in point 1.1.5, the assessment body shall refrain from imposing the risk acceptance principle to be used by the proposer.
V skladu z načelom iz točke 1.1.5 ocenjevalni organ od predlagatelja ne bo zahteval uporabe načela sprejemanja tveganja.
The proposer shall demonstrate in the risk evaluation that the selected risk acceptance principle is adequately applied.
Predlagatelj v ovrednotenju tveganja dokaže, da se izbrano načelo sprejemanja tveganja pravilno uporablja.
The application of these risk acceptance principles shall identify possible safety measures that make the risk(s) of the system under assessment acceptable.
Z uporabo teh načel sprejemanja tveganja se opredelijo morebitni varnostni ukrepi, s katerimi se tveganja v sistemu, ki se ocenjuje, zmanjšajo na sprejemljivo raven.
Among these safety measures, those selected to control the risk(s) shall become the safety requirements to be fulfilled by the system.
Tisti od navedenih varnostnih ukrepov, ki se izberejo za nadzor tveganj, se pretvorijo v varnostne zahteve, ki jih mora sistem izpolnjevati.
Compliance with these safety requirements shall be demonstrated in accordance with point 3.
Skladnost s temi varnostnimi zahtevami se dokaže v skladu s točko 3.
The iterative risk assessment process is considered to be completed when it is demonstrated that all safety requirements are fulfilled and no additional reasonably foreseeable hazards have to be considered.
Šteje se, da je iterativni postopek ocene tveganja končan, ko se dokaže, da so izpolnjene vse varnostne zahteve in da ni treba upoštevati dodatnih možnih nevarnosti.
Hazard identification
Ugotavljanje nevarnosti
All identified hazards shall be registered in the hazard record in accordance with point 4.
Vse ugotovljene nevarnosti se navedejo v evidenci nevarnosti v skladu s točko 4.
To focus the risk assessment efforts upon the most important risks, the hazards shall be classified according to the estimated risk arising from them.
Da se ocena tveganja osredotoči na najbolj pomembna tveganja, se nevarnosti razvrstijo glede na ocenjeno tveganje, ki izhaja iz njih.
The expert judgement shall take into account that the contribution of all the broadly acceptable risks does not exceed a defined proportion of the overall risk.
Pri strokovni presoji se upošteva, da vsa širše sprejemljiva tveganja ne presegajo opredeljenega skupnega deleža tveganj.
During the hazard identification, safety measures may be identified.
Med ugotavljanjem nevarnosti se lahko določijo tudi varnostni ukrepi.
They shall be registered in the hazard record in accordance with point 4.
Navedejo se v evidenci nevarnosti v skladu s točko 4.