natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The main reason for the reduction of the production capacity was the shutdown of three Union producers during the period considered.
Glavni vzrok zmanjšanja proizvodne zmogljivosti je bilo zaprtje treh proizvajalcev Unije v obravnavanem obdobju.
The sales volume of all Union producers on the Union market significantly decreased by 25 % between 2008 and 2009 due to a decreasing demand.
Obseg prodaje vseh proizvajalcev Unije na trgu Unije se je med letoma 2008 in 2009 zaradi zmanjševanja povpraševanja znatno zmanjšal, tj. za 25 %.
After 2009, however, the demand substantially increased in the Union, as mentioned in recital (97) above, but the Union sales remained at the low level of 2009 until the end of the period considered.
Čeprav se je povpraševanje v Uniji po letu 2009 bistveno povečalo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (97), je prodaja Unije vse do konca obravnavanega obdobja ostala na nizki ravni iz leta 2009.
It is therefore shown that the Union industry could not benefit from the recent growth in Union consumption due to the increasing market share of dumped imports from the two countries concerned.
To dokazuje, da industrija Unije zaradi vedno večjega tržnega deleža dampinškega uvoza iz obeh zadevnih držav ni mogla imeti koristi zaradi nedavne rasti potrošnje Unije.
As the table above shows, the Union producers have substantially decreased investments between 2008 and 2010.
Kot je prikazano v preglednici zgoraj, so se naložbe proizvajalcev Unije med letoma 2008 in 2010 bistveno zmanjšale.
This trend reversed during the IP, when the investments significantly rebounded, but without reaching the level at the beginning of the period considered.
Ta trend se je obrnil v OP, ko so se naložbe močno okrepile, vendar niso dosegle ravni z začetka obravnavanega obdobja.
The employment in full-time equivalents (FTE) largely followed the development of the production volumes (see recital (112) above), which indicates that the Union industry has attempted to rationalise manufacturing costs when it was necessary.
Zaposlenost v ekvivalentih polnega delovnega časa (EPDČ) se je na splošno razvijala podobno kot obseg proizvodnje (glej uvodno izjavo (112)), kar kaže, da si je industrija Unije prizadevala racionalizirati proizvodne stroške, ko je bilo to potrebno.
The Union industry tried to adapt their workforce to the worsening market situation, leading to a steady overall decrease in employment of 36 % during the period considered.
Industrija Unije je poskušala svojo delovno silo prilagoditi vedno slabšim razmeram na trgu, zato se je zaposlenost v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno stalno zmanjševala, in sicer se je zmanjšala za 36 %.
Despite the above attempts of the Union industry to align the employment to worsening market situation, the output per FTE of the Union producers fell considerably by 19 % between 2008 and 2009.
Kljub navedenim prizadevanjem industrije Unije, da bi zaposlenost prilagodila vedno slabšim razmeram na trgu, se je produktivnost proizvajalcev Unije v ekvivalentih polnega delovnega časa med letoma 2008 in 2009 znatno zmanjšala, tj. za 19 %.
The situation continuosly improved afterwards, but remained 9 % below the beginning of the period considered.
Pozneje se je stanje izboljševalo, vendar je bila produktivnost še vedno 9 % nižja od ravni na začetku obravnavanega obdobja.
The satisfactory profitability of the Union industry at the beginning of the period considerd (see recital (119) above) suggests that these measures brought temporary relief to the Union industry.
Na podlagi zadovoljive dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije na začetku obravnavanega obdobja (glej uvodno izjavo(119)) je mogoče sklepati, da so ti ukrepi industriji Unije začasno pomagali.
The increasing volumes of dumped imports have, however, put an end to this rather positive period.
Vendar se je zaradi večjega obsega dampinškega uvoza to razmeroma pozitivno obdobje končalo.
However, during the whole period considered, export sales accounted for only 13 %-15 % of the Union industry's production.
Vendar je v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju izvoz znašal le 13-15 % proizvodnje industrije Unije.
Therefore they do not appear to have contributed to any significant degree to the injury suffered by the Union industry during the IP.
Zato se ne zdi, da je v večjem obsegu prispeval k škodi, ki jo je industrija Unije utrpela v OP.
Interested parties claimed that an important cause of injury was the crisis on the Spanish construction market, which allegedly strongly affects ATUSA, a Spanish company and one of the main complainants.
Zainteresirane strani so navedle, da je bil pomemben vzrok za škodo kriza na španskem gradbenem trgu, ki domnevno znatno vpliva na špansko družbo ATUSA, ki je eden od glavnih pritožnikov.
However, ATUSA sells in most EU Member States and the actual impact of the Spanish construction crises was limited to their Spanish sales, which never accounted for the majority of their sales.
Vendar družba ATUSA prodaja v večini držav članic EU, dejanski učinek krize na španskem gradbenem trgu pa je bil omejen na prodajo družbe v Španiji, ki ni nikoli predstavljala večine njene prodaje.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1072/2012
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1072/2012
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve za uvoz keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
On 16 February 2012, the European Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the country concerned’, ‘China’ or ‘the PRC’).
(1) Evropska komisija je 16. februarja 2012 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku), objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevna država, Kitajska ali LRK) v Unijo.
The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 3 January 2012 on behalf of EU producers (‘the complainants’), representing more than 30 % of the total Union production of ceramic tableware and kitchenware.
Postopek je bil uveden na podlagi pritožbe, ki je bila 3. januarja 2012 vložena v imenu proizvajalcev EU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožniki), ki predstavljajo več kot 30 % celotne proizvodnje keramične namizne in kuhinjske posode v Uniji.
The Commission also advised producers in the Russian Federation, which was proposed in the notice of initiation as a possible analogue country.
Komisija je obvestila tudi proizvajalce v Ruski federaciji, ki je bila v obvestilu o začetku predlagana kot možna primerljiva država.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the large number of Union producers involved in this proceeding, the notice of initiation announced that the Commission had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers for the determination of injury in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Ker postopek vključuje veliko število proizvajalcev Unije, je Komisija v obvestilu o začetku sporočila, da je za ugotovitev škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
That pre-selection had been made by using the information available to the Commission at initiation stage and it was based on the producers’ sales volume, size, geographic location in the Union and product segment.
Ta predizbor je bil izveden na podlagi informacij, ki so bile Komisiji na voljo v začetni fazi, in je temeljil na obsegu prodaje, velikosti, zemljepisne lege v Uniji in segmentu izdelka proizvajalca.
It included six Union producers covering all major product types and located in five Member States, out of which two where small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Vključeval je šest proizvajalcev Unije s sedežem v petih državah članicah, ki so pokrivali vse glavne vrste izdelkov, pri čemer sta bila dva proizvajalca mali in srednje veliki podjetji (MSP).
That preliminary sample accounted for over 15 % of the estimated total Union production.
Ta predhodni vzorec je zajemal več kot 15 % ocenjene celotne proizvodnje Unije.
However, one of the preliminary sampled producers did not wish to be part of the sample and several interested parties submitted that a Member State with large production volumes had been overlooked and should be included in a representative sample.
Vendar eden od predhodno vzorčenih proizvajalcev ni želel biti vključen v vzorec, več zainteresiranih strani pa je navedlo, da je bila spregledana država članica z velikim obsegom proizvodnje in da je treba to državo vključiti v reprezentativni vzorec.
In view of this, the Commission changed its preliminary sample and the resulting final sample included seven Union producers covering all major product types and located in six Member States, out of which two were SMEs.
Komisija je v skladu s tem spremenila predhodni vzorec, tako da je končni vzorec vključeval sedem proizvajalcev Unije s sedežem v šestih državah članicah, ki so pokrivali vse glavne vrste izdelkov, pri čemer sta bila dva od teh proizvajalcev MSP.
That sample represented over 20 % of the estimated total Union production.
Ta vzorec je zajemal več kot 20 % ocenjene celotne proizvodnje Unije.
Around 400 exporting producers or groups of exporting producers in the PRC who account for over 60 % of total exports provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Približno 400 proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, ki predstavljajo več kot 60 % celotnega izvoza, je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received the Commission provisionally selected a sample of five exporting producers with the highest export volume to the Union and invited all exporting producers known to the Commission to make comments on the proposed sample.
Na podlagi informacij je Komisija začasno izbrala vzorec petih proizvajalcev izvoznikov z največjim obsegom izvoza v Unijo in pozvala vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike, da predložijo pripombe o predlaganem vzorcu.
Two exporting producers pre-selected to form part of the sample then corrected their sampling information such that their export volume was not sufficient for them to be included in the sample.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika, ki sta bila predhodno izbrana v vzorec, sta nato spremenila svoje informacije za vzorčenje, zaradi česar njun obseg izvoza ni zadostoval za vključitev v vzorec.
The Commission then selected the final sample with the updated five largest companies in terms of export volume.
Komisija je nato izbrala končni vzorec na podlagi posodobljenih podatkov o petih največjih družbah glede na obseg izvoza.
The sampled companies account for almost 20 % of the exports to the Union of all cooperating exporting producers.
Vzorčene družbe predstavljajo skoraj 20 % izvoza vseh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo.
The companies or groups of companies finally selected to be included in the sample are:
Družbe ali skupine družb, nazadnje izbrane za vključitev v vzorec, so:
Hunan Hualian China Industry Co., Ltd and its related companies,
Hunan Hualian China Industry Co., Ltd in njene povezane družbe,
Guangxi Sanhuan Enterprise Group Holding Co., Ltd and its related companies,
Guangxi Sanhuan Enterprise Group Holding Co., Ltd in njene povezane družbe,
CHL International Ltd and its related companies,
CHL International Ltd in njene povezane družbe,
Shandong Zibo Niceton-Marck Huaguang Ceramics Limited and its related companies (‘Niceton’), and
Shandong Zibo Niceton-Marck Huaguang Ceramics Limited in njene povezane družbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Niceton) ter
Guangxi Province Beiliu City Laotian Ceramics Co., Ltd
Guangxi Province Beiliu City Laotian Ceramics Co., Ltd.,
One company contested the selection of sampled companies and claimed that it should be included in the sample.
Ena družba je izpodbijala izbor vzorčenih družb in trdila, da bi morala biti vključena v vzorec.
It argued that its inclusion would not make the number of sampled companies unreasonable or cause delays to the investigation, especially since the company is a relatively small exporter.
Navedla je, da število vzorčenih družb zaradi njene vključitve ne bi bilo preveliko in da njena vključitev ne bi povzročila zamud pri preiskavi, zlasti ker je družba razmeroma majhen izvoznik.
It further claimed that the company is foreign-owned and that the sample would not be representative without its inclusion.
Navedla je tudi, da je družba v tuji lasti in da vzorec brez njene vključitve ne bi bil reprezentativen.
The Commission recalls that the selection of sampled companies was made on the basis of the largest quantities of volumes in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation taking into account the number of producers that could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija opozarja, da so bile vzorčene družbe izbrane na podlagi največje količine obsega v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe ob upoštevanju števila proizvajalcev, ki ga je mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
Considering that the company is a relatively small exporter, its inclusion would not add any value to the representativeness of the sample in terms of volume exported.
Glede na to, da je družba razmeroma majhen izvoznik, njena vključitev z vidika obsega izvoza ne bi imela nobenega dodatnega pomena za reprezentativnost vzorca.
Furthermore, it is also noted that the company came forward very late — four months after the final selection had been communicated to all exporting producers and also after verification visits at the selected companies’ premises had taken place.
Poleg tega je treba navesti, da se je družba javila zelo pozno, tj. štiri mesece po tem, ko so bili vsi proizvajalci izvozniki obveščeni o končnem izboru, in tudi po izvedbi preveritvenih obiskov v prostorih izbranih družb.
The request to be included in the sample has therefore been rejected.
Zato je bila zahteva za vključitev v vzorec zavrnjena.
More than sixty unrelated importers replied by the deadline to the sampling questions and offered cooperation in the proceeding.
Na vprašanja o vzorčenju je do izteka roka odgovorilo več kot šestdeset nepovezanih uvoznikov, ki so bili pripravljeni sodelovati v postopku.
From those companies, five were selected to form the sample.
Pet od teh družb je bilo izbranih v vzorec.
These five unrelated importers were selected on the basis of the volumes and value of imports and resales in the Union, their geographical location, their business model and their product segment.
Teh pet nepovezanih uvoznikov je bilo izbranih glede na obseg ter vrednost uvoza in nadaljnje prodaje v Uniji, njihovo geografsko lego, poslovni model ter segment izdelka.
The sampled companies corresponded to the largest representative volumes and value of imports and resales in the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Vzorčene družbe so predstavljale največji reprezentativni obseg ter vrednost uvoza in nadaljnje prodaje v Uniji, ki ju je mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
According to the figures reported at the sampling stage, they accounted for ca. 6 % of the imports of the product concerned during the IP.
Glede na podatke, predložene v fazi vzorčenja, so te družbe v OP predstavljale približno 6 % uvoza zadevnega izdelka.
In order to allow exporting producers in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the Chinese exporting producers that had so requested and to the Chinese authorities.
Da bi lahko proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK vložili zahtevek za tržno gospodarsko obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TGO) ali individualno obravnavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IO), če tako želijo, je Komisija kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so to zahtevali, in kitajskim organom poslala obrazce zahtevka.
Eleven Chinese exporting producers or groups of exporting producers requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, or IT should the investigation establish that they did not meet the conditions for MET.
Enajst kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov je zahtevalo TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe ali IO, če bi preiskava pokazala, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO.
Three of these claimants were included in the sample whereas the other eight were not.
Trije od teh pritožnikov so bili vključeni v vzorec, ostalih osem pa ne.
One of these exporting producers, not included in the sample, subsequently withdrew its MET request while retaining its claim for IT.
Eden od teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, je nato umaknil svoj zahtevek za TGO, ohranil pa je zahtevek za IO.
The remaining two exporting producers in the sample and four other companies, not included in the sample, requested IT only.
Preostala dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz vzorca in štiri druge družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, so zahtevali le IO.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the five sampled exporting producers in the PRC and to almost 300 other exporting producers in the PRC that had so requested.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala petim vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK in skoraj 300 drugim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK, ki so to zahtevali.
Moreover, questionnaires were sent to the seven Union producers selected in the sample, the five importers selected in the sample, four associations of retailers and distributors and also to individual retailers and distributors who so requested.
Poleg tega so bili vprašalniki poslani sedmim proizvajalcem Unije, izbranim v vzorec, petim uvoznikom, izbranim v vzorec, štirim združenjem prodajalcev na drobno in distributerjev ter tudi posameznim prodajalcem na drobno in distributerjem, ki so to zahtevali.
In addition, questionnaires were sent to exporting producers in India, Turkey, Brazil, Thailand and Russia, which were considered candidate countries for the selection of an appropriate analogue country.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani tudi proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Indiji, Turčiji, Braziliji, na Tajskem in v Rusiji, ki so se štele za države kandidatke za ustrezno primerljivo državo.
Replies were received from thirteen exporting producers or groups of exporting producers in the PRC and from three producers from possible analogue countries (Brazil, Thailand and Russia).
Odgovore je poslalo trinajst proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK in trije proizvajalci iz možnih primerljivih držav (Brazilije, Tajske in Rusije).
Furthermore, questionnaire replies were received from the seven Union producers selected in the sample and the five importers selected in the sample.
Poleg tega je odgovore na vprašalnik poslalo sedem proizvajalcev Unije in pet uvoznikov, izbranih v vzorec.
Questionnaire replies were also received from one retailer, one distributor and two associations of retailers and distributors.
Odgovore na vprašalnik so poslali tudi en prodajalec na drobno, en distributer ter dve združenji prodajalcev na drobno in distributerjev.
In addition, the Commission received submissions from more than 20 importers not related to an exporting producer, several retailers, a provider of marketing programmes and from the Chinese Chamber of Light Industrial Products and Arts-Crafts (CCCLA).
Poleg tega je Komisija prejela prispevke več kot 20 uvoznikov, ki niso povezani s proizvajalcem izvoznikom, več prodajalcev na drobno, ponudnika programov trženja in kitajske gospodarske zbornice za proizvode lahke industrije in obrti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CCCLA).
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a provisional determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele pomembne za začasno ugotavljanje dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the seven sampled Union producers.
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih sedmih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
The sampled Union producers as well as other cooperating Union producers requested, on the grounds of the provisions of Article 19 of the basic Regulation, that their identities be kept confidential.
Vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije in drugi sodelujoči proizvajalci Unije so na podlagi določb člena 19 osnovne uredbe zahtevali, da se njihova identiteta ne razkrije.
They claimed that the disclosure of their identity could lead to a risk of significant adverse effects.
Trdili so, da bi lahko razkritje njihove identitete imelo znaten škodljiv vpliv.
Certain complainant Union producers supply customers in the Union that also source their products from China, thus benefiting directly from these imports.
Nekateri proizvajalci Unije, ki so pritožniki, izdelke dobavljajo strankam v Uniji, ki izdelke nabavljajo tudi na Kitajskem, pri čemer imajo neposredne koristi od tega uvoza.
Those complainants considered themselves therefore in a sensitive position since some of their clients might not be satisfied with their lodging or supporting a complaint against alleged injurious dumping.
Navedeni pritožniki so trdili, da so zato v občutljivem položaju, ker nekatere njihove stranke morda ne bi bile zadovoljne, če bi vložili ali podprli pritožbo glede domnevno škodljivega dampinga.
For these reasons they considered that there was a risk of retaliation by some of their clients.
Zato so trdili, da obstaja nevarnost, da bi nekatere njihove stranke sprejele povračilne ukrepe.
In addition, certain complainant Union producers are also exporting to China.
Poleg tega nekateri proizvajalci Unije, ki so pritožniki, izvažajo tudi na Kitajsko.
Those companies deemed that lodging or supporting a complaint against alleged injurious dumping could represent a threat to their business in China.
Te družbe so trdile, da bi lahko vložitev ali podpora pritožbe zoper domnevno škodljiv damping ogrozila njihovo poslovanje na Kitajskem.
The request was granted as it was sufficiently substantiated.
Zahteva je bila odobrena, saj je bila ustrezno utemeljena.
The representatives of certain exporting producers, the CCCLA and some unrelated importers claimed that they could not properly exercise their right of defence because the identity of the complainants and supporters had not been disclosed.
Predstavniki nekaterih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, CCCLA in nekaterih nepovezanih uvoznikov so trdili, da niso mogli ustrezno uveljaviti svoje pravice do obrambe, saj identiteta pritožnikov in podpornikov pritožbe ni bila razkrita.
They argued that, in those circumstances, parties were precluded from commenting on standing, material injury, whether producers could be excluded from the Union industry according to Article 4(1)(a) of the basic Regulation and/or the representativity of the sample.
Trdili so, da zainteresirane strani v takšnih okoliščinah niso mogle predložiti pripomb o položaju, znatni škodi, o tem, ali so lahko proizvajalci izključeni iz industrije Unije v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) osnovne uredbe, in/ali o reprezentativnosti vzorca.