natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this regard, the Commission first of all observes that the judgment only concerns payments made for the year 2010.
V zvezi s tem Komisija najprej opaža, da se sodba nanaša samo na plačila, izvedena za leto 2010.
If at all, it could therefore only have created legitimate expectations for that year (and the following years, provided the mechanism remained unchanged).
Če sploh, bi tako lahko ustvarila legitimna pričakovanja samo za navedeno leto (in prihodnja leta ob predpostavki, da se mehanizem ne bi spremenil).
Only in justified individual cases can the Commission take account of comments that are submitted late by parties to proceedings [5].
Komisija lahko pripombe, ki jih strani v postopku predložijo pozneje, upošteva samo v posameznih utemeljenih primerih [5].
The Commission can see no such justification in the ZT’s letter or in any other circumstances.
Komisija v dopisu podjetja ZT ali v katerih koli drugih okoliščinah ni zaznala take utemeljitve.
In this connection the BVerwG held that for the purposes of classifying the provision of reserve capacity it was irrelevant whether the ZT maintained quite unnecessary excess capacity.
Sodišče BVerwG je v zvezi s tem razsodilo, da za opredelitev zagotavljanja rezervne zmogljivosti ni bilo pomembno, ali je podjetje ZT vzdrževalo dokaj nepotrebno presežno zmogljivost.
It was for the regional and local authorities alone to decide whether to finance overcapacity or insist that it be reduced.
Regionalni in lokalni organi so se morali sami odločiti, ali bodo presežno zmogljivost financirali ali vztrajali pri tem, da jo je treba zmanjšati.
Farmers and slaughterhouses can easily be identified as the polluters.
Kmete in klavnice je mogoče zlahka opredeliti kot onesnaževalce.
Farmers benefit from the effective handling of animal epidemics, as these can pose a threat to their flocks and hence to their assets.
Kmetje imajo korist od učinkovitega obvladovanja epidemij živalskih bolezni, saj lahko te ogrozijo njihove črede in posledično njihovo premoženje.
The breakdown of the capacity costs between normal operations and the epidemic reserve was determined on the basis of the average utilisation of the total capacity available in 5-day 3-shift operation. On average it emerged that the ZT uses around 50 % of the total capacity available in 3-shift operation on 5 days.
Izkazalo se je, da podjetje ZT v povprečju uporabi 50 % skupne zmogljivosti, ki je na razpolago s petdnevnim triizmenskim obratovanjem.
The specified epidemic reserve of 1185 t/week stands alongside unused capacity of 2819 t/week available for the required period of six weeks.
Določena rezerva za epidemije v višini 1185 ton/teden obstaja vzporedno z neizkoriščeno zmogljivostjo v višini 2819 ton/teden, ki je na razpolago za zahtevano obdobje šestih tednov.
The unused capacity actually available is considerably more than twice as high as that required.
Dejansko razpoložljiva neizkoriščena zmogljivost je precej več kot dvakrat večja od zahtevane.
As the table below shows, the ZT can cover the prescribed epidemic reserve with the operational spare capacity available in the short term at nights and at weekends — as in the other Länder.
Kot kaže spodnja preglednica, lahko podjetje ZT predpisano rezervo za epidemije krije z operativno prosto zmogljivostjo, ki je kratkoročno na razpolago ponoči in ob vikendih, tako kot v drugih deželah.
Altmark judgment, cited above.
Sodba Altmark, navedena zgoraj.
As the utilisation statistics in Table 3 show (column ‘spare capacity due to utilisation rate’), the ZT has never fully used it available technical capacity in 5-day 2-shift operation. Especially since 2002 the utilisation rate has fallen sharply as a result of the steep drop in internal material.
Kot je razvidno iz statističnih podatkov o izkoriščenosti v preglednici 3 (stolpec „prosta zmogljivost zaradi stopnje izkoriščenosti“), podjetje ZT ni nikoli v celoti izkoristilo svoje razpoložljive tehnične zmogljivosti s petdnevnim dvoizmenskih obratovanjem.
First from the cost of the epidemic reserve the under-utilisation in 5-day 2-shift operation is calculated out (= spare capacity due to utilisation rate). The other costs of the epidemic reserve are then divided up in proportion to the quantities involved and the calculated under-utilisation. Since there is no collection for Baden-Württemberg, the collection and processing costs are treated separately.
Ker se v zvezni deželi BW zbiranje ne izvaja, se stroški zbiranja in predelave obravnavajo ločeno.
Political and Security Committee Decision EUAVSEC-South Sudan/1/2012
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora EUAVSEC-South Sudan/1/2012
of 10 August 2012
z dne 10. avgusta 2012
on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Aviation Security CSDP Mission in South Sudan (EUAVSEC-South Sudan)
o imenovanju vodje misije Evropske unije za varovanje letalstva v okviru SVOP v Južnem Sudanu (EUAVSEC-South Sudan)
(2012/487/CFSP)
(2012/487/SZVP)
Having regard to Council Decision 2012/312/CFSP of 18 June 2012 on the European Union Aviation Security CSDP Mission in South Sudan [1], and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2012/312/SZVP z dne 18. junija 2012 o misiji Evropske unije za varovanje letalstva v okviru SVOP v Južnem Sudanu [1] in zlasti člena 9(1) Sklepa,
By Article 9(1) of Decision 2012/312/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the EUAVSEC-South Sudan, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.
Svet je na podlagi člena 9(1) Sklepa 2012/312/SZVP pooblastil Politični in varnostni odbor, da v skladu s členom 38 Pogodbe odloča o zadevah v zvezi z izvajanjem političnega nadzora in strateškim vodenjem misije EUAVSEC-South Sudan, vključno s sklepom o imenovanju vodje misije.
The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of Mr Lasse ROSENKRANDS CHRISTENSEN as Head of Mission of EUAVSEC-South Sudan until 18 January 2014,
Visoki predstavnik Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko je predlagal, da se g. Lasse ROSENKRANDS CHRISTENSEN imenuje za vodjo misije EUAVSEC-South Sudan do 18. januarja 2014 –
Mr Lasse ROSENKRANDS CHRISTENSEN is hereby appointed Head of European Union Aviation Security CSDP Mission in South Sudan (EUAVSEC-South Sudan) until 18 January 2014.
G. Lasse ROSENKRANDS CHRISTENSEN se imenuje za vodjo misije Evropske unije za varovanje letalstva v okviru SVOP v Južnem Sudanu (EUAVSEC-South Sudan) do 18. januarja 2014.
Done at Brussels, 10 August 2012.
V Bruslju, 10. avgusta 2012
OJ L 158, 19.6.2012, p. 17.
UL L 158, 19.6.2012, str. 17.
on the position to be taken by the European Union within the Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development set up by the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, as regards the operation of the Civil Society Forum and the establishment of the Panel of Experts to examine the matters in the areas falling within the scope of the Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development
o stališču Evropske unije v Odboru za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj, ustanovljenem s Sporazumom o prosti trgovini med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Korejo na drugi strani, v zvezi z delovanjem foruma civilne družbe in vzpostavitvijo skupine strokovnjakov za preučitev zadev, ki spadajo v področje delovanja Odbora za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 207(4) v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
The Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part [1] (‘the Agreement’), was signed on 6 October 2010.
Sporazum o prosti trgovini med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Korejo na drugi strani [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) je bil podpisan 6. oktobra 2010.
Pursuant to Article 15.10(5) of the Agreement, the Agreement has been provisionally applied since 1 July 2011 subject to its conclusion at a later date.
V skladu s členom 15.10(5) Sporazuma se Sporazum začasno uporablja od 1. julija 2011 s pridržkom njegove poznejše sklenitve.
Article 13.13(1) of the Agreement provides that the parties shall agree by decision of the Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) (‘the EU-Korea Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development’) on the operation of the Civil Society Forum no later than one year after the entry into force of the Agreement.
Člen 13.13(1) Sporazuma določa, da se pogodbenici s sklepom Odbora za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Odbor za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj EU-Koreja) dogovorita o delovanju foruma civilne družbe najpozneje eno leto po začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma.
Article 13.15(3) foresees the establishment of a list of persons who could be called to serve in a Panel of Experts to examine any matter arising under the TSD chapter that could not be satisfactorily addressed through government consultations.
Člen 13.15(3) določa vzpostavitev seznama oseb, ki bi lahko bile pozvane k sodelovanju v skupini strokovnjakov za preučitev zadev v zvezi s trgovino in trajnostnim razvojem, ki niso bile zadovoljivo obravnavane na posvetovanjih na vladni ravni.
The Union should determine the position to be taken with regard to the operation of the Civil Society Forum and the list of persons who could be called to serve as experts,
Unija bi zato morala oblikovati stališče v zvezi z delovanjem foruma civilne družbe in seznamom oseb, ki bi lahko bile pozvane k sodelovanju kot strokovnjaki –
The position to be taken by the Union in the EU-Korea Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development set up by the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, as regards:
Stališče Unije v Odboru za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj EU-Koreja, ustanovljenem s Sporazumom o prosti trgovini med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Korejo na drugi strani, v zvezi z:
the operation of the Civil Society Forum foreseen in Article 13.13(1) of the Agreement; and
delovanjem foruma civilne družbe, določenega v členu 13.13(1) Sporazuma, in
the establishment of a list of qualified individuals to serve as panellists, in accordance with Article 13.15(3) of the Agreement;
vzpostavitvijo seznama usposobljenih posameznikov, ki bi lahko delovali kot člani skupine v skladu s členom 13.15(3) Sporazuma,
shall be based on the draft decisions of the EU-Korea Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development attached to this Decision.
temelji na osnutkih sklepov Odbora za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj EU-Koreja, ki so priloženi temu sklepu.
DECISION No …/2012 OF THE EU-KOREA COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
SKLEP št. …/2012 ODBORA ZA TRGOVINO IN TRAJNOSTNI RAZVOJ EU-KOREJA
THE EU-KOREA COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,
ODBOR ZA TRGOVINO IN TRAJNOSTNI RAZVOJ EU-KOREJA JE –
Having regard to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 6 October 2010 (‘the Agreement’), and in particular Article 13.13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o prosti trgovini med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Korejo na drugi strani, ki je bil podpisan 6. oktobra 2010 v Bruslju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum), in zlasti člena 13.13 Sporazuma,
The composition of the Civil Society Forum shall ensure a balanced representation of members of the Domestic Advisory Group(s).
Sestava foruma civilne družbe zagotovi uravnoteženo zastopanje članov nacionalnih svetovalnih skupin.
The Parties shall agree by decision of the EU-Korea Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development on the operation of the Civil Society Forum no later than one year after the entry into force of the Agreement,
Pogodbenici se s sklepom Odbora za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj EU-Koreja dogovorita o delovanju foruma civilne družbe najpozneje eno leto po začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma –
The implementation of the recommendations of the Panel of Experts shall be monitored by the EU-Korea Committee on Trade and Sustainable Development.
Izvajanje priporočil skupine strokovnjakov nadzoruje Odbor za trgovino in trajnostni razvoj EU-Koreja.
The Parties have developed a list of 18 names, as specified in the Annex to this Decision,
Pogodbenici sta pripravili seznam 18 imen, ki je naveden v Prilogi k temu sklepu –
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption and shall be reported to the EU-Korea Trade Committee.
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan sprejetja in se posreduje Odboru za trgovino EU-Koreja.
of 24 August 2012
z dne 24. avgusta 2012
amending Decision 2007/453/EC as regards the BSE status of Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, Croatia and Nicaragua
o spremembi Odločbe 2007/453/ES glede BSE-statusa Belgije, Avstrije, Brazilije, Kolumbije, Hrvaške in Nikaragve
(notified under document C(2012) 5860)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 5860)
For that purpose, the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) status of Member States or third countries or regions thereof (‘countries or regions’) is to be determined by classification into one of three categories depending on the BSE risk involved, namely a negligible BSE risk, a controlled BSE risk and an undetermined BSE risk.
Zato je treba status držav članic ali tretjih držav ali njihovih regij („držav ali regij“) v zvezi z bovino spongiformno encefalopatijo (BSE) določiti z uvrstitvijo v eno od treh kategorij glede na tveganje BSE, in sicer zanemarljivo tveganje BSE, nadzorovano tveganje BSE in nejasno tveganje BSE.
The Annex to Commission Decision 2007/453/EC of 29 June 2007 establishing the BSE status of Member States or third countries or regions thereof according to their BSE risk [2] lists countries or regions according to their BSE risk status.
V Prilogi k Odločbi Komisije 2007/453/ES z dne 29. junija 2007 o določitvi BSE-statusa držav članic ali tretjih držav ali njihovih regij v skladu z njihovim tveganjem BSE [2] je naveden seznam držav ali regij v skladu z njihovim statusom tveganja BSE.
The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) plays a leading role in the categorisation of countries or regions according to their BSE risk.
Mednarodna organizacija za zdravje živali (OIE) ima vodilno vlogo pri razvrščanju držav ali regij v skladu z njihovim tveganjem BSE.
The list in the Annex to Decision 2007/453/EC takes account of Resolution No 17 — Recognition of the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Risk Status of Members — adopted by the OIE in May 2011 regarding the BSE status of Member States and third countries.
Seznam v Prilogi k Odločbi 2007/453/ES upošteva Resolucijo št. 17 – Priznavanje statusa članic v zvezi z bovino spongiformno encefalopatijo, ki jo je OIE sprejela maja 2011 v zvezi z BSE-statusom držav članic in tretjih držav.
In May 2012, the OIE adopted Resolution No 16 — Recognition of the Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Risk Status of Member Countries.
(4) Maja 2012 je OIE sprejela Resolucijo št. 16 – Priznavanje statusa držav članic v zvezi s tveganjem bovine spongiformne encefalopatije.
That Resolution recognised Austria, Belgium, Brazil and Colombia as having a negligible BSE risk, and Croatia and Nicaragua as having a controlled BSE risk.
Navedena resolucija priznava Belgijo, Avstrijo, Brazilijo in Kolumbijo kot države z zanemarljivim tveganjem BSE, Hrvaško in Nikaragvo pa kot državi z nadzorovanim tveganjem BSE.
The list in the Annex to Decision 2007/453/EC should therefore be amended to be brought into line with that Resolution as regards those Member States and third countries.
Seznam v Prilogi k Odločbi 2007/453/ES bi bilo zato treba spremeniti, da se uskladi z navedeno resolucijo v zvezi z navedenimi državami članicami in tretjimi državami.
Decision 2007/453/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2007/453/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Done at Brussels, 24 August 2012.
V Bruslju, 24. avgusta 2012
A. Countries or regions with a negligible BSE risk
A. Države ali regije z zanemarljivim tveganjem BSE
Colombia
Filipini
New Zealand
Kolumbija
Panama
Nova Zelandija
Paraguay
Panama
Peru
Paragvaj
B. Countries or regions with a controlled BSE risk
B. Države ali regije z nadzorovanim tveganjem BSE
Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, United Kingdom
Bolgarija, Češka, Nemčija, Estonija, Irska, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Nizozemska, Poljska, Portugalska, Romunija, Slovenija, Slovaška, Združeno kraljestvo.
Croatia
Japonska
Nicaragua
Mehika
C. Countries or regions with an undetermined BSE risk
C. Države ali regije z nejasnim tveganjem BSE
Countries or regions not listed in point A or B of this Annex.’
Države ali regije, ki niso navedene v točki A ali B te priloge.“
on amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks
o spremembi Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 715/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pogojih za dostop do prenosnih omrežij zemeljskega plina
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005 [1], and in particular Article 23(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o pogojih za dostop do prenosnih omrežij zemeljskega plina in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1775/2005 [1] ter zlasti člena 23(2) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 sets non-discriminatory rules for access conditions to natural gas transmission systems to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market in gas.
Uredba (ES) št. 715/2009 določa nediskriminatorna pravila za pogoje dostopa do prenosnih omrežij zemeljskega plina, da se zagotovi pravilno delovanje notranjega trga s plinom.
Since the duplication of gas transmission systems is in most cases not economic and efficient, competition in natural gas markets is stimulated by third-party access opening infrastructure to all suppliers in a transparent and non-discriminatory way.
Ker je podvajanje infrastrukture za prenos plina največkrat negospodarno in neučinkovito, se konkurenco na trgih z zemeljskim plinom spodbuja z dostopom tretjih oseb in odprtjem infrastrukture vsem dobaviteljem na pregleden in nediskriminatoren način.
The frequent occurrence of contractual congestion where network users cannot gain access to gas transmission systems in spite of the physical availability of the capacity is an obstacle on the road towards completing the internal energy market.
Pogost pojav pogodbene prezasedenosti, pri kateri uporabniki omrežja kljub fizično razpoložljivim zmogljivostim ne morejo dobiti dostopa do sistemov za prenos plina, je ovira na poti k dokončnemu oblikovanju notranjega energetskega trga.
The practice has shown that despite the application of certain congestion-management principles such as the offering of interruptible capacities as provided for by Regulation (EC) No 1775/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks [2] and Regulation (EC) No 715/2009, contractual congestion in the Union gas transmission networks remains an obstacle to the development of a well-functioning internal market in gas.
Pokazalo se je, da pogodbena prezasedenost v omrežjih Unije za prenos plina še naprej ovira razvoj dobro delujočega notranjega trga s plinom kljub uporabi nekaterih načel za upravljanje prezasedenosti, kakor je ponudba prekinljivih zmogljivosti, ki je predvidena v Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1775/2005 z dne 28. septembra 2005 o pogojih za dostop do prenosnih omrežij zemeljskega plina [2] in Uredbi (ES) št. 715/2009.
Therefore it is necessary to amend the guidelines on the application of congestion-management procedures in the event of contractual congestion.
Zato je treba spremeniti smernice o uporabi postopkov za upravljanje prezasedenosti v primeru pogodbene prezasedenosti.
In accordance with Article 23(3) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 the proposed guidelines should reflect differences between national gas systems and may set minimum requirements to be met to achieve non-discriminatory and transparent network access conditions with respect to congestion management procedures.
V skladu s členom 23(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2009 bi morale predlagane smernice odražati razlike med nacionalnimi plinskimi sistemi in lahko določijo minimalne zahteve, ki jih je treba izpolnjevati za dosego nediskriminatornih in preglednih pogojev za dostop do omrežja ob upoštevanju postopkov za upravljanje prezasedenosti.
The congestion-management procedures should apply in the event of contractual congestion and are aimed at resolving those events by bringing unused capacity back to the market to be reallocated in the course of the regular allocation processes.
Postopki za upravljanje prezasedenosti se morajo uporabljati v primeru pogodbene prezasedenosti in so namenjeni za reševanje teh primerov z vračanjem neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti nazaj na trg, da se prerazporedijo v rednem postopku dodeljevanja. Smernice o postopkih za upravljanje prezasedenosti v primeru pogodbene prezasedenosti ne obravnavajo rednih postopkov dodeljevanja zmogljivosti.
Where an interconnection point is frequently subject to the occurrence of physical congestion, congestion management procedures may often be of no avail.
Kadar se na povezovalni točki pogosto pojavlja fizična prezasedenost, postopki za upravljanje prezasedenosti pogosto niso prava rešitev.
In those cases a solution should be examined from a network planning and investment point of view.
V takšnih primerih je treba rešitev preučiti z vidika načrtovanja omrežja in naložb.
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (‘the Agency’) should monitor and analyse the implementation of these guidelines.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 713/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] Agencija za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) spremlja in analizira izvajanje teh smernic.
It is necessary that transmission system operators publish the information necessary to identify the occurrence of contractual congestion in a workable format.
Operaterji prenosnih sistemov morajo objavljati informacije, ki so potrebne za ugotavljanje nastopa pogodbene prezasedenosti, v obliki, primerni za obdelavo.
In accordance with Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 the national regulatory authorities ensure compliance with those guidelines.
V skladu s členom 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2009 zagotavljajo skladnost z navedenimi smernicami.