natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with what is called the ‘three times three’ recipe, two-thirds of the dough is spread with a layer of margarine and the dough is then folded in three so that there are three layers of dough interspersed with two layers of fat.
Po receptu, znanem kot „tri krat tri“, se dve tretjini testa razvaljata skupaj s plastjo margarine, potem pa se testo trikrat prepogne, da nastanejo tri plasti testa z dvema vmesnima plastema maščobe.
It is then rolled and folded in three a further twice or folded in four once.
Nato se testo razvalja in še dvakrat prepogne v tri dele ali še enkrat v štiri dele.
This produces the layering which is characteristic of croissant dough.
Tako nastanejo plasti, značilne za testo za rogljičke.
The white-poppy-seed filling, to which almond flavouring is added, clearly distinguishes the ‘rogal świętomarciński’ from other sweet pastries.
Zaradi nadeva iz belih makovih semen, ki se mu doda mandljeva aroma, se rogljiček „Rogal świętomarciński“ jasno razlikuje od drugih sladic.
White poppy seeds are a special and rarely used ingredient.
Bela makova semena so posebna in redko uporabljena sestavina.
The following are essential to the product’s exceptional nature:
Proizvod je poseben zaradi naslednjih bistvenih značilnosti:
the flaky croissant dough, containing the following ingredients: wheat flour, margarine, milk, eggs, sugar, yeast, salt, lemon flavouring.
kosmičastega testa za rogljičke, ki vsebuje naslednje sestavine: pšenično moko, margarino, mleko, jajca, sladkor, kvas, sol, limonino aromo,
the filling, made primarily from white poppy seeds, to which are added: sugar, sponge-cake crumbs, egg pulp, margarine, raisins, nuts, fruit in syrup or candied fruit (sweet cherries, pears, orange peel) and almond flavouring.
glavna sestavina nadeva so bela makova semena, ki se jim dodajo: sladkor, biskvitne drobtine, jajčna masa, margarina, rozine, lešniki, sadje v sirupu ali kandirano sadje (češnje, hruške, pomarančna lupinica) in mandljeva aroma,
the method of folding the dough and filling it with a poppy-seed pulp and the icing and chopped-nut decoration influence the final unique shape and general appearance of the pastry.
način prepogibanja testa in nadevanje z maso iz makovih semen ter okrasitev s prelivom in sesekljanimi lešniki vplivajo na končno edinstveno obliko in splošni videz peciva.
The combination of these ingredients and the specific flaky pastry make the ‘rogal świętomarciński’ an exceptional and unique product.
Zaradi kombinacije teh sestavin in posebnega kosmičastega testa je rogljiček „Rogal świętomarciński“ izjemen in edinstven proizvod.
Causal link between the geographical area and the quality or characteristics of the product (for PDO) or a specific quality, reputation or other characteristic of the product (for PGI)
5.3 Vzročna povezanost geografskega območja s kakovostjo ali značilnostmi proizvoda (pri ZOP) oziroma z določeno kakovostjo, slovesom ali drugimi značilnostmi proizvoda (pri ZGO)
The history, baking tradition and reputation of the ‘rogal świętomarciński’
Zgodovina, pekarska tradicija in ugled rogljička „Rogal świętomarciński“:
The ‘rogal świętomarciński’ has enjoyed unwaning popularity and success in Poznań for at least 150 years.
Rogljiček „Rogal świętomarciński“ je v Poznańu že vsaj 150 let enako priljubljen in uspešen.
In the minds of the citizens of Poznań and visitors to this city on the river Warta, the product is associated with Saint Martin’s Day celebrations on 11 November.
Prebivalci Poznańa in obiskovalci tega mesta ob reki Varta rogljiček povezujejo s praznovanjem martinovega 11. novembra.
The many legends and traditions relating to when the baking of this pastry began testify to the product’s reputation.
Številne legende in tradicije, povezane s peko tega peciva, pričajo o ugledu tega proizvoda.
According to one of these legends, the first person to bake the ‘rogal świętomarciński’ in Poznań was the confectioner Józef Melzer, who encouraged his employer to bake croissants which were then distributed to the city’s poor.
Po eni od teh legend je prvi rogljiček „Rogal świętomarciński“ v Poznańu spekel slaščičar Józef Melzer, ki je svojega delodajalca nagovoril k peki rogljičkov, ki so jih nato razdelili mestnim revežem.
He is said to have come up with the idea in November 1891 after having listened to the preachings of Fr Jan Lewicky, the priest of the parish of Saint Martin, who urged that the patron saint of the parish, who personifies love for one’s neighbour, and is also the patron saint of bakers, be honoured by means of some act of compassion towards Poznań’s poor.
To zamisel naj bi dobil novembra 1891 po poslušanju pridig brata Jana Lewickega, duhovnika v župniji svetega Martina, ki je ljudi pozval, naj zavetnika župnije, ki pooseblja ljubezen do bližnjega in je tudi zavetnik pekov, častijo z izkazovanjem usmiljenja do revežev v Poznańu. Tudi oblika rogljička ima tradicionalne korenine.
The croissant shape also has traditional roots; its origin is attributed to the time of King Jan III Sobieski’s victory over the Turks at the gates of Vienna.
Izhajala naj bi iz časov zmage kralja Jana III. Sobieskega nad Turki pred vrati Dunaja.
In 1683, King Jan III Sobieski of Poland seized many Turkish flags, on which a crescent moon was depicted; this shape has served as a model for baking the ‘rogal świętomarciński’, in commemoration of this victory.
Leta 1683 je poljski kralj Jan III. Sobieski zasegel številne turške zastave, na katerih je bil upodobljen polmesec.
According to another Poznań legend, the shape alludes to the horseshoe lost by Saint Martin’s horse.
Ta oblika se je uporabila kot model za peko rogljička „Rogal świętomarciński“ v spomin na to zmago. Po drugi legendi iz Poznańa oblika ponazarja podkev, ki jo je izgubil konj svetega Martina.
The oldest known reference to croissants being baked on Saint Martin’s Day was placed in the Gazeta Wielkiego Księstwa Poznańskiego [Gazette of the Grand Duchy of Poznan] of 10 November 1852 by the confectioner Antoni Pfitzner, who had opened his shop three years earlier on ul. Wrocławska in Poznań.
Najstarejša znana navedba rogljičkov, ki se pečejo na martinovo, je oglas v publikaciji Gazeta Wielkiego Księstwa Poznańskiego („Glasilo Velikega vojvodstva Poznań“) z dne 10. novembra 1852, in sicer oglas slaščičarja Antonija Pfitznerja, ki je tri leta prej odprl svojo trgovino v Wrocławski ulici v Poznańu.
‘Tomorrow, Thursday, filled croissants available at various prices at A. Pfitzner’s confectioner’s shop on ul. Wrocławska’.
„Jutri, v četrtek, bodo v slaščičarni A. Pfitznerja v Wrocławski ulici na voljo polnjeni rogljički po različnih cenah.“
The first recorded use of the name ‘rogal świętomarciński’ can be found in a press announcement from 11 November 1860.
Prvo zabeleženo uporabo imena „Rogal świętomarciński“ je mogoče najti v obvestilu za tisk z dne 11. novembra 1860.
After the Second World War, the tradition of baking the ‘rogal świętomarciński’ was continued by private confectioners and bakers in Poznań.
Po drugi svetovni vojni so tradicijo peke rogljička „Rogal świętomarciński“ nadaljevali zasebni slaščičarji in peki v Poznańu.
The Nationalisation Act of 3 January 1946 did not cover small craft firms.
Zakon o nacionalizaciji z dne 3. januarja 1946 ni zajemal manjših obrtniških delavnic.
The type of filling used in the pastry changed at that time.
Takrat se je spremenil tudi nadev sladice.
Given the difficulties affecting supplies, the ingredients to make an almond filling became virtually unavailable, and confectioners and bakers began to replace the almond filling with a white-poppy-seed filling.
Sestavin za mandljev nadev zaradi težav z oskrbo praktično ni bilo mogoče dobiti, zato so slaščičarji in peki začeli mandljev nadev nadomeščati z nadevom iz belih makovih semen.
Since the 1960s newspapers have regularly reported the quantity of croissants eaten by the citizens of Poznań on 11 November.
Od šestdesetih let 20. stoletja so časopisi redno poročali o količini rogljičkov, ki jih prebivalci Poznańa pojedo 11. novembra.
The ‘rogal świętomarciński’ has become a symbol of Poznań with which official guests are served.
Rogljiček „Rogal świętomarciński“ je postal simbol Poznańa, ki se postreže uradnim gostom.
It was awarded a prize by the Polish Tourism Organisation in 2004, being described as follows:
Leta 2004 je prejel nagrado Poljske turistične organizacije, ki ga je opisala kot:
‘… a traditional pastry made using a unique recipe and baked only in Poznań for Saint Martin’s Day …’.This information demonstrates the reputation of this specific product and its association with Poznań and the entire region.
„… tradicionalno pecivo, ki se pripravlja po edinstvenem receptu in peče le v Poznańu na martinovo …“. Ta informacija prikazuje ugled tega proizvoda ter njegovo povezavo s Poznańom in celotno regijo.
Thanks to this source of information, it is known today that consumption grew from just over 10 tonnes in the early 1960s to some 42,5 tonnes in 1969.
Iz tega vira informacij danes vemo, da se je uživanje povečalo z nekaj več kot 10 ton na začetku šestdesetih let 20. stoletja na približno 42,5 tone leta 1969.
Nowadays, 250 tonnes of the product are sold on average on Saint Martin’s Day by producers in Poznań, while annual sales are in the region of 500 tonnes.
Danes proizvajalci iz Poznańa na martinovo prodajo povprečno 250 ton tega proizvoda, medtem ko znaša letna prodaja v regiji 500 ton.
This amendment also means that it is necessary to delete the following sentence relating to the dimensions of the croissant from point 3.2 of the Single Document: ‘(It …) fits within a square of approximately 14x14 cm, with a height at its thickest point of approximately 7 cm and a width of approximately 10 cm’. This is a consequence of the change in the permitted weight of the product, and there is no justification for maintaining the dimensions indicated in this case.
Ta sprememba pomeni tudi, da je treba črtati naslednji stavek v zvezi z velikostjo rogljička iz točke 3.2 enotnega dokumenta: „(ga…) je mogoče položiti v kvadrat z merami približno 14 × 14 cm, pri čemer je v svoji najdebelejši točki visok približno 7 cm in širok približno 10 cm.“ To je posledica spremembe dovoljene teže proizvoda, zato v tem primeru ni razloga za ohranitev navedenih mer.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 598/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 598/2013
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 564/2012 establishing budgetary ceilings for 2012 applicable to certain direct support schemes provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 564/2012 o določitvi zgornjih meja proračuna za leto 2012 za nekatere sheme neposrednih podpor iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [1], and in particular Article 142(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 [1] ter zlasti člena 142(c) Uredbe,
Article 69(4) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 limits the resources that can be used for any coupled measure provided for in Article 68(1)(a)(i) to (iv) and Article 68(1)(b) and (e) of that Regulation to 3,5 % of the national ceiling referred to in Article 40 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009.
S členom 69(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so sredstva, ki se lahko uporabljajo za kateri koli vezani ukrep iz člena 68(1)(a)(i) do (iv) ter člena 68(1)(b) in (e) navedene uredbe, omejena na 3,5 % nacionalne zgornje meje iz člena 40 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
The budgetary ceilings for the support provided for in Article 68(1)(a)(i) to (iv) and Article 68(1)(b) and (e) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 for calendar year 2012 are set out in Annex III to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 564/2012 [2].
Zgornje meje proračuna za podporo iz člena 68(1)(a)(i) do (iv) ter člena 68(1)(b) in (e) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 za koledarsko leto 2012 so določene v Prilogi III k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 564/2012 [2]
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1270/2012 [3] provides certain derogations for Portugal as regards the deadline for reviewing its decision on specific support for 2012, as regards the deadline for notification of such review, as regards the conditions applicable to specific agricultural activities entailing additional agri-environment benefits and as regards the information contained in the aid application.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1270/2012 [3] določa nekatera odstopanja za Portugalsko glede roka za revizijo odločitve o posebni podpori za leto 2012, glede roka za obveščanje o taki reviziji, glede pogojev, ki veljajo za posebne kmetijske dejavnosti z dodatnimi koristmi za kmetijstvo, ter glede informacij, ki jih vsebujejo zahtevki za pomoč.
On 4 January 2013, Portugal has informed the Commission of the amended support measures which it intends to apply for 2012.
Portugalska je 4. januarja 2013 Komisijo obvestila o spremenjenih ukrepih podpore, ki jih namerava uporabiti za leto 2012.
According to the information submitted, Portugal intends:
Portugalska glede na predložene informacije namerava:
to amend the current support measure under Article 68(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 in the dairy sector by increasing the envelope allocated to that measure from EUR 8,8 million to EUR 10,32 million in 2012,
spremeniti trenutni ukrep podpore iz člena 68(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 v sektorju mleka s povečanjem sredstev, dodeljenih za ta ukrep, iz 8,8 milijona EUR na 10,32 milijona EUR v letu 2012,
to amend the current support measure under Article 68(l)(a)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 by restricting its scope to bovine females of the ‘Brava de Lide’ breed reducing the respective envelope by EUR 2,53 million,
spremeniti trenutni ukrep podpore iz člena 68(1)(a)(i) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 in ga omejiti na samice goveda pasme „Brava de Lide“, kar bi zmanjšalo zadevna sredstva za 2,53 milijona EUR,
to introduce a new support measure under Article 68(l)(a)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 for the maintaining of certain autochthonous breeds of beef (‘Alentejana’, ‘Mertolenga’), sheep (‘Serra de Estrela’, ‘Churra de Terra Quente’) and goat (‘Serrana’), with a total allocated envelope of EUR 1,68 million, and
uvesti nov ukrep podpore v skladu s členom 68(1)(a)(v) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 za vzdrževanje nekaterih avtohtonih pasem goveda („Alentejana“, „Mertolenga“), ovac („Serra de Estrela“, „Churra de Terra Quente“) in koz („Serrana“), v celotni vrednosti 1,68 milijona EUR dodeljenih sredstev in
to reduce the envelope of a measure under Article 68(l)(a)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 for extensive pasturing by EUR 0,67 million.
zmanjšati sredstva za ukrep iz člena 68(1)(a)(v) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 v zvezi z ekstenzivnim pašništvom za 0,67 milijona EUR.
Those amendments affect the level of support provided for in Article 68(1)(a)(i) to (iv) and Article 68(1)(b) and (e) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, and thus the budgetary ceiling for Portugal set out in Annex III to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 564/2012.
Navedene spremembe vplivajo na raven podpore, določene s členom 68(1)(a)(i) do (iv) ter členom 68(1)(b) in (e) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 ter na zgornje meje proračuna za Portugalsko, določene v Prilogi III k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 564/2012.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 564/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 564/2012 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
As the amendments apply for the year 2012, it is appropriate that this Regulation enters into force immediately.
Ker spremembe zadevajo leto 2012, je primerno, da navedena uredba začne takoj veljati.
In Annex III to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 564/2012, the row concerning Portugal is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi III k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 564/2012 se vrstica, ki zadeva Portugalsko, nadomesti:
Done at Brussels, 24 June 2013.
V Bruslju, 24. junija 2013
OJ L 168, 28.6.2012, p. 26.
UL L 168, 28.6.2012, str. 26.
OJ L 357, 28.12.2012, p. 7.
UL L 357, 28.12.2012, str. 7.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 599/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 599/2013
amending Regulation (EU) No 578/2010 as regards the amounts of refunds for exports, not covered by certificates, of certain agricultural products in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty and the notification, by Member States, of certain related data
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 578/2010 glede zneskov nadomestil za izvoz, ki ni zajet v potrdilih, nekaterih kmetijskih proizvodov, izvoženih kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, in sporočanja nekaterih s tem povezanih podatkov s strani držav članic
Commission Regulation (EU) No 578/2010 of 29 June 2010 on the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009 as regards the system of granting export refunds for certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds [2] provides that small exporters are exempted from presenting a refund certificate up to total amounts fixed at individual and global level.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 578/2010 z dne 29. junija 2010 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1216/2009 glede sistema dodeljevanja izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kmetijske proizvode, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, in meril za določanje višine teh nadomestil [2] določa, da so mali izvozniki oproščeni obveznosti predložitve potrdila o nadomestilu do višine skupnega zneska, ki je določena na individualni in splošni ravni.
It also provides that refund certificates applied for and, in some cases, refund certificates issued, are to be communicated to the Commission.
Določa tudi, da je treba Komisijo obvestiti o potrdilih o nadomestilu, za katera je bila vložena vloga, in v nekaterih primerih o izdanih potrdilih o nadomestilu.
Recent reductions in export refund rates, due to the combined effects of the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and of the movements in agricultural commodity prices on the world market, have led to a situation in which less or no applications for refund certificates have been submitted, consequently easing the pressure on the Union budget for export refunds on goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty.
Zaradi nedavnih znižanj stopenj izvoznih nadomestil kot posledice kombiniranih učinkov reforme skupne kmetijske politike in gibanj cen osnovnih kmetijskih proizvodov na svetovnem trgu je bilo vloženih manj vlog za potrdila o nadomestilu oz. ni bila vložena nobena vloga, kar je posledično razbremenilo proračun Unije za izvozna nadomestila za blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi.
In those circumstances where the Union is not in danger of breaching its international commitments, it is appropriate to simplify the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, therefore reducing the administrative burden.
V okoliščinah, v katerih Unija ni v nevarnosti kršenja svojih mednarodnih obveznosti, je primerno poenostaviti sistem dodeljevanja izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kmetijske proizvode, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, s čimer se zmanjša upravno breme.
It is therefore appropriate to increase the payment threshold beneath which small exporters are exempted from submitting a refund certificate at individual and at global level.
Zato je primerno povečati prag za višino plačil, do katerega so mali izvozniki oproščeni obveznosti predložitve potrdila o nadomestilu, ki je določen na individualni in splošni ravni.
It is also appropriate to suspend the obligations for the competent authorities of the Member States to notify the amounts of refund certificates applied for where the refunds applicable to all the basic products are either suspended, not fixed or equal to zero, to notify certain refund certificates issued where no refund certificates were issued and, where no amounts are involved, the obligation to notify certain information for guaranteeing the functioning and the management of the refund certificate system and to inform the Commission that no amounts have been granted.
Primerno je tudi začasno ukiniti obveznosti sporočanja informacij s strani pristojnih organov v državah članicah o višini zneskov potrdil o nadomestilih, za katera je bila vložena vloga, kadar so nadomestila za osnovne proizvode začasno ukinjena, niso določena ali so enaka nič, sporočanja informacij o nekaterih potrdilih o nadomestilu, kadar ni bilo izdano nobeno potrdilo o nadomestilu, in obveznosti sporočanja nekaterih informacij za zagotavljanje delovanja in upravljanja sistema potrdil o nadomestilih, kadar ne gre za zneske.
Regulation (EU) No 578/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (EU) št. 578/2010 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on horizontal questions concerning trade in processed agricultural products not listed in Annex I to the Treaty,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora za horizontalna vprašanja glede trgovine s predelanimi kmetijskimi proizvodi, ki niso navedeni v Prilogi I k Pogodbi –
Regulation (EU) No 578/2010 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EU) št. 578/2010 se spremeni:
Article 42(1) is replaced by the following:
1. člen 42(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Certificates shall not be required for exports for which applications submitted by the operator during the budget year do not give rise to payment of more than EUR 200000.’;
Potrdila niso potrebna za izvoz, za katerega vloge, ki jih je izvajalec vložil v proračunskem letu, ne presegajo plačila v višini 200000 EUR.“;
Article 43(1) is replaced by the following:
2. člen 43(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
For each budget period, exports referred to in Article 42(1) shall be eligible for payment of a refund within the limit of a total reserve of EUR 80 million for each budget year.’;
Za vsako proračunsko obdobje je izvoz iz člena 42(1) upravičen do izplačila nadomestila znotraj zgornje meje skupne rezerve 80 milijonov EUR za vsako proračunsko leto.“;
The following Article 53a is inserted:
3. vstavi se naslednji člen 53a:
Where the refund applicable to all of the basic products listed in Annex I is either suspended, not fixed or equal to zero, during one of the periods mentioned in Article 29(1)(a) to (f), the obligation for the Member States to notify related to that period and provided for by Article 30 and Article 34(2) shall be suspended.
Kadar je nadomestilo v enem izmed obdobij iz člena 29(1)(a) do (f) za enega ali vse osnovne proizvode iz Priloge I začasno ukinjeno, nedoločeno ali enako nič, je obveznost sporočanja informacij s strani držav članic, ki je povezana z navedenim obdobjem in določena v členu 30 in členu 34(2), začasno ukinjena.
Where no refund certificates were issued during the periods referred to in Article 51(1)(c) and (d), the obligation for the Member States to notify provided for by Article 51(1)(c) and (d) shall be suspended.
Kadar v obdobjih iz člena 51(1)(c) in (d) ni bilo izdano nobeno potrdilo o nadomestilu, je obveznost sporočanja informacij s strani držav članic, določena v členu 51(1)(c) in (d), začasno ukinjena.
Where no amounts are involved, the obligations for the Member States to notify provided for by Article 51(1)(a) and (b), Article 51(2), Article 52 and the first sentence of Article 53 and to inform that no amounts have been granted provided for by the second sentence of Article 53, shall be suspended.’.
Kadar ne gre za zneske, so obveznosti sporočanja informacij s strani držav članic iz člena 51(1)(a) in (b), člena 51(2), člena 52 in prvega stavka člena 53 in obveznosti sporočanja o tem, da ni bil odobren noben znesek, kot to določa drugi stavek člena 53, začasno ukinjene.“