natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
rejects the argument that the constraints imposed on the Court of Auditors by its statistical sample method, which effectively prevents the Court of Auditors from naming Member States with the highest error rate;
zavrača razlago, da omejitve, s katerimi se srečuje Računsko sodišče zaradi svoje metode statističnega vzorčenja, dejansko preprečujejo, da bi imenovalo države članice z najvišjo stopnjo napak;
calls on the Court of Auditors to compare its audit findings with those of the Commission in order to identify those Member States or regions most affected by the level and/or occurrence of errors;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj primerja svoje revizijske ugotovitve z ugotovitvami Komisije, da bi ugotovilo, katere so tiste države članice ali regije, ki sta jih stopnja in/ali pojav napak najbolj prizadela;
European Stability Mechanism
Evropski mehanizem za stabilnost
Notes the entry into force of the European Stability Mechanism but regrets that this mechanism was set up outside the Union’s institutional framework, as this precludes any democratic, political and budgetary control by the Union institutions and in particular by Parliament;
je seznanjen, da je začel veljati evropski mehanizem za stabilnost, vendar obžaluje, da je bil ustanovljen zunaj institucionalnega okvira Unije, saj to izključuje dejanski demokratični, politični in proračunski nadzor s strani institucij Unije, zlasti Parlamenta;
emphasises the fact that the creation outside the institutions of the Union represents a setback in the evolution of the Union, essentially at the expense of Parliament, the Court of Auditors and the Court of Justice of the European Union;
poudarja, da je oblikovanje takšnih instrumentov zunaj institucij Unije korak nazaj v razvoju Unije, predvsem na račun Parlamenta, Računskega sodišča in Sodišča Evropske unije;
deems it essential that the ESM will be discussed at least once a year in a plenary debate in the presence of the Council and the Commission on the basis on the annual report from the ESM Board of Auditors;
meni, da bo treba ta mehanizem na podlagi letnega poročila njegovega odbora revizorjev nujno vsaj enkrat letno obravnavati na plenarnem zasedanju v navzočnosti Sveta in Komisije;
Anti-fraud Strategy
Strategija za preprečevanje goljufij
Calls on the Commission to report on and evaluate the anti-fraud strategies established within each directorate-general following the adoption of the Commission’s new Anti-Fraud Strategy (COM(2011) 376) and the Internal Action Plan (SEC(2011) 787) for its implementation in June 2011;
poziva Komisijo, naj po sprejetju nove strategije za preprečevanje goljufij (COM(2011) 376) in notranjega akcijskega načrta za njeno izvajanje (SEC(2011) 787) v juniju 2011 poroča o strategijah za preprečevanje goljufij v posameznih generalnih direktoratih in te strategije tudi oceni;
Tobacco Industry
Tobačna industrija
Calls on the Commission to report how it intends to improve as soon as possible its provision to introduce a pro-active management of potential conflict of interests and ‘revolving doors’;
poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o tem, kako namerava čim prej izboljšati priprave na uvedbo proaktivnega upravljanja morebitnih navzkrižij interesov in primerov, ko se uradniki izmenično zaposlujejo v agencijah in zasebnem sektorju;
Calls on the Commission to report how it has implemented Article 5(3) of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and how it intends to improve and clarify existing rules;
poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o tem, kako izvaja člen 5(3) okvirne konvencije Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije o nadzoru nad tobakom in kako namerava izboljšati in poenostaviti obstoječa pravila;
Calls on the Commission to provide Parliament as soon as possible with an overview about all (public and non-public) documents and all persons involved in the negotiations of the four cooperation agreements with the tobacco industry;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu čim prej posreduje pregled vseh (javnih in internih) dokumentov in oseb, udeleženih v pogajanjih o štirih sporazumih o sodelovanju s tobačno industrijo;
Notes that the Union is a under signatory to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC);
ugotavlja, da je Unija podpisnica okvirne konvencije Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije o nadzoru nad tobakom;
deems the implementation of Article 5(3) as a legally binding obligation to the Union;
meni, da je izvajanje člena 5(3) pravno zavezujoča obveznost Unije;
questions how and why the Commission has deviated from those guidelines;
se sprašuje, kako in zakaj se je Komisija oddaljila od teh smernic;
Budgetary management
Upravljanje proračuna
Implementation rates, budgetary surplus, outstanding budgetary commitments
Stopnje izvrševanja, proračunski presežek, neporavnane proračunske obveznosti
Welcomes the high level of budget implementation, namely 99,3 % of commitment appropriations (the same as in 2010) and 98,6 % of payment appropriations (2010: 96,6 %) and the reduction of the overall surplus from EUR 4,5 billion in 2010 to EUR 1,5 billion in 2011;
pozdravlja visoko stopnjo izvrševanja proračuna, in sicer 99,3 % obveznosti (enako kot leta 2010) in 98,6 % plačil (2010: 96,6 %), ter znižanje skupnega presežka s 4,5 milijarde EUR leta 2010 na 1,5 milijarde EUR leta 2011;
Is concerned by the acceleration in the rate of payment requests by the Member States towards the end of the year as regards the ESF, the ERDF and the Cohesion fund, because this prevents the Commission from requesting an amending budget from the budgetary authority in due time in order to increase the payment appropriations with a view to honouring the claims received;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pospešene rasti števila zahtevkov za izplačilo iz držav članic proti koncu leta, ki zadevajo Evropski socialni sklad, Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj in Kohezijski sklad, saj Komisija zaradi tega od proračunskega organa ne more pravočasno zahtevati spremembe proračuna, da bi povečala plačila za poplačilo prejetih terjatev;
therefore asks the Commission to urge the Member States to transmit most of the claims as early as possible;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj spodbudi države članice, da bodo čim prej posredovale večino zahtevkov;
Warns against the concentration of a significant proportion of payments in the month of December, which could affect the effectiveness of supervisory and control systems and increase the risk of error;
opozarja pred kopičenjem plačil v decembru, kar lahko vpliva na uspešnost nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov ter poveča tveganje napak;
Expresses concern about the significant increase in outstanding budgetary commitments from EUR 13 billion in 2010 to EUR 207 billion, mostly in cohesion policy, for the programming period 2007-2013;
je zaskrbljen zaradi znatnega povečanja neporavnanih proračunskih obveznosti za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 s 13 milijard EUR leta 2010 na 207 milijard EUR;
Insists that sufficient payment appropriations need to be made available in future years from the outset;
vztraja pri tem, da je treba v naslednjih letih že na začetku zagotoviti dovolj sredstev za plačila;
Traditional own resources and VAT
Tradicionalna lastna sredstva in DDV
Notes that the Court of Auditors, in its annual report, found that the revenue calculation was free from material error;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v letnem poročilu ugotovilo, da v izračunu prihodkov ni bilo bistvenih napak;
is concerned, however, that as far as traditional own resources (TOR) are concerned, the Court of Auditors’ audit cannot cover undeclared imports or those that have escaped customs surveillance and that the annual report does not, therefore, provide an estimation of losses to the Union budget in that respect;
vseeno je v zvezi s tradicionalnimi lastnimi sredstvi zaskrbljen, da revizija Računskega sodišča ne more zajemati neprijavljenega uvoza ali uvoza, ki se je izognil carinskemu nadzoru, in da zato v letnem poročilu v zvezi s tem ni ocene izgub v proračunu Unije;
suggests that the Court of Auditors issue a special report on undeclared imports based on a survey in at least 10 Member States and to adjust its working programme for 2013 accordingly;
predlaga Računskemu sodišču, naj pripravi posebno poročilo o neprijavljenem uvozu na podlagi raziskave v najmanj desetih državah članicah in temu ustrezno prilagodi svoj delovni program za leto 2013;
Is of the opinion that the Court of Auditors’ performance audit in the area of revenue is of particular value and encourages the Court of Auditors to concentrate more of its resources in this area;
meni, da je revizija uspešnosti, ki jo je Računsko sodišče opravilo na področju prihodkov, še posebej dragocena, in ga spodbuja, da več svojih virov nameni temu področju;
regrets that the annual report, around which much of the Court of Auditors’ work is centred, nevertheless provides little information as to the real situation as far as efficient collection of revenue is concerned;
sočasno obžaluje, da letno poročilo, ki mu Računsko sodišče posveti največ dela, zagotavlja le malo informacij o dejanskem stanju pri pobiranju prihodkov;
calls on the Court of Auditors to place greater emphasis in its annual report on the revenue audit, in order to present a comprehensive picture of the effectiveness of the revenue collection system in the Member States, and of the consequences of its inadequate functioning;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v letnem poročilu bolj poudari revizijo prihodkov, da bi dobili celovitejši pregled nad učinkovitostjo sistema pobiranja prihodkov v državah članicah in posledicami neustreznega delovanja tega sistema;
Recalls that Parliament monitors the situation with regard to the collection of own resources in its own-initiative report on the protection of the Union’s financial interests, which is drafted annually on the basis of a Commission report;
opozarja, da Parlament spremlja stanje zbiranja lastnih sredstev v samoiniciativnem poročilu o zaščiti finančnih interesov Unije, katerega osnutek letno pripravi na podlagi poročila Komisije;
Is deeply concerned by the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that there are continuing weaknesses in national customs supervision and that it cannot, therefore, be ensured that the TOR recorded are complete and correct;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitve Računskega sodišča, da se v nacionalnem carinskem nadzoru še vedno pojavljajo pomanjkljivosti in da zaradi tega ni mogoče zagotoviti, da bi bila prijavljena tradicionalna lastna sredstva celotna in točna;
finds it unacceptable that the control of customs procedures in Member States is not functioning properly;
meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da nadzor carinskih postopkov v državah članicah ne deluje, kot bi moral;
recalls that the correct operation of customs procedures has direct consequences in terms of the calculation of the value added tax;
opozarja, da ima pravilno delovanje carinskih postopkov neposredne posledice za izračun davka na dodano vrednost;
is deeply worried by the Court of Auditors’ finding in Special Report No 13/2011 that the application of customs procedure 42 [23] alone accounted for extrapolated losses of approximately EUR 2200 million [24] in 2009 with regard to the seven Member States which were audited, representing 29 % of the VAT theoretically applicable on the taxable amount of all the imports made under customs procedure 42 in 2009 in those seven Member States;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitve Računskega sodišča v posebnem poročilu št. 13/2011, da je v sedmih državah članicah, ki jih je to sodišče revidiralo, v letu 2009 že samo uporaba carinskega postopka 42 [23] prispevala k ekstrapoliranim izgubam v višini približno 2200 milijonov EUR [24], kar je 29 % DDV, ki bi se teoretično odmeril na davčno osnovo vsega uvoza, opravljenega leta 2009 po carinskem postopku 42 v teh sedmih državah članicah;
Stresses the Court of Auditors’ conclusion in Special Report No 13/2011 that ‘VAT evasion affects the financial interests of Member States; notes that it has an impact on the Union budget as it leads to lower VAT-based own resources. notes that this loss is compensated by the GNI-based own resource, distorting individual Member States’ contributions to the EU budget and that tax fraud undermines the functioning of the internal market and prevents fair competition’ [25];
poudarja ugotovitev Računskega sodišča v posebnem poročilu št. 13/2011, da „utaja DDV vpliva na finančne interese držav članic. Vpliva tudi na proračun EU, ker vodi do nižjih lastnih sredstev iz naslova DDV. Ta izguba se nadomesti z lastnimi sredstvi iz naslova BND, kar izkrivlja prispevke posameznih držav članic v proračun EU. Poleg tega davčne goljufije spodkopavajo delovanje notranjega trga in preprečujejo pošteno konkurenco“ [25];
Emphasises that the Court of Auditors’ findings in Special Report No 13/2011 were corroborated by the conclusions of the fact-finding mission of Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control to the ports of Rotterdam and Antwerp, which took place on 19 and 20 September 2012;
poudarja, da so ugotovitve Računskega sodišča v posebnem poročilu št. 13/2011 potrdile ugotovitve misije za ugotavljanje dejstev Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za proračunski nadzor v zvezi s pristaniščema Rotterdam in Antwerp, ki je potekala 19. in 20. septembra 2012;
points out that the Union is a major trading block and that large European ports handle many ships;
ugotavlja, da je Unija velik trgovinski partner in da velika evropska pristanišča privabljajo številne ladje;
notes that as a result of logistical pressures, those ports rely on the procedures provided for in the customs regulation and that authorised economic operators gain in importance;
ugotavlja, da ta pristanišča zaradi logističnih pritiskov uporabljajo postopke, predvidene v carinski uredbi, in da imajo pooblaščeni gospodarski subjekti vse pomembnejšo vlogo;
notes, however, that Rotterdam, for example, the largest European port granted a high-level of simplified custom procedures to importers compared with other major ports in the Union;
ugotavlja pa, da Rotterdam, največje evropsko pristanišče, uvoznikom ponuja zelo poenostavljene carinske postopke v primerjavi z drugimi večjimi pristanišči v Uniji;
stresses that the simplification of customs procedures must include a proper and effective risk based policy approach leading to effective control systems avoiding the distortion of competition and that simplified procedures should be effectively monitored regularly by the Commission and Member States;
poudarja, da bi morala poenostavitev carinskih postopkov vključevati primeren in učinkovit pristop, temelječ na tveganju, da ne bi smela voditi k manj učinkovitim nadzornim sistemom oziroma k izkrivljanju konkurence in da bi morale Komisija in države članice poenostavljene postopke učinkovito in redno nadzorovati;
notes that reduced controls could translate into major economic advantages for a port;
ugotavlja, da zmanjšani nadzor lahko prinese velike ekonomske prednosti za pristanišče;
stresses that any unjustified reduced control may seriously harm the Union’s financial interests and that of the Member States;
poudarja, da lahko vsakršno neutemeljeno zmanjšanje nadzora resno škoduje finančnim interesom Unije in držav članic;
Takes note of the initiatives taken by the Commission by way of follow-up to the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 13/2011;
je seznanjen s pobudami, ki jih je sprejela Komisija v okviru nadaljnjega ukrepanja na podlagi posebnega poročila št. 13/2011 Računskega sodišča;
regrets, however, that according to the First Eurofisc Activity Report for 2011 issued in May 2012, the main findings and observations of that Special Report are still outstanding;
vseeno obžaluje, da so glavne ugotovitve in pripombe iz omenjenega posebnega poročila glede na prvo Eurofiscovo poročilo o dejavnostih za leto 2011, izdano maja 2012, še vedno skrb zbujajoče;
requests information before September 2013 on progress made;
želi biti še pred septembrom 2013 obveščen o doseženem napredku;
Is seriously concerned, in particular, by the finding of the Working Field 3 that in most Member States, tax administrations have no direct access to customs data and that automated cross-checking with tax data is, therefore, not possible;
je resno zaskrbljen predvsem zaradi ugotovitve delovnega področja 3, da davčne uprave v večini držav članic nimajo neposrednega dostopa do carinskih podatkov in da avtomatizirano navzkrižno preverjanje z davčnimi podatki zaradi tega ni mogoče;
requests information as to the reasons why this was not done;
zahteva pojasnilo, zakaj to ni bilo storjeno;
Deplores the fact that the Council has not acted upon the Court of Auditors’ recommendation to amend the VAT Directive in order to hold the importer (or his tax representative) jointly and severally liable for the VAT loss in the Member State of destination in cases where a complete and timely VAT recapitulative statement is not submitted by him;
obžaluje dejstvo, da Svet ni ukrepal na podlagi priporočila Računskega sodišča za spremembo direktive o DDV, po kateri bi bil uvoznik (ali njegov davčni zastopnik) solidarno odgovoren za izgubo DDV v namembni državi članici v primerih, ko ne bi predložil popolnega in pravočasnega rekapitulacijskega poročila o DDV;
Calls on the Commission to intensify its efforts to remedy the situation with regard to the state of implementation of the Court of Auditors’ recommendations contained in its Special Report No 13/2011;
poziva Komisijo, naj si bolj prizadeva za izboljšanje stanja v zvezi z izvajanjem priporočil Računskega sodišča iz posebnega poročila št. 13/2011;
Deplores the fact that the Commission and the Member States have been unable to ensure timely implementation of the Modernised Customs Code (MCC), which was supposed to become applicable on 24 June 2013 at the latest;
obžaluje dejstvo, da Komisija in države članice niso zmogle zagotoviti pravočasnega izvajanja posodobljenega carinskega zakonika, ki bi moral začeti veljati najpozneje 24. junija 2013;
stresses that any further delays will impede adequate protection of the Member States’ financial interests and, consequently, those of the Union itself;
poudarja, da bo nadaljnje odlašanje onemogočilo ustrezno zaščito finančnih interesov držav članic in posledično tudi finančnih interesov Unije;
emphasises the fact that according to the Commission, this situation is due, to a considerable extent, to the fact that the Member States cannot agree on the most appropriate IT development methodology and that they are facing limitations in human and financial resources;
poudarja, da je to stanje po mnenju Komisije v veliki meri posledica dejstva, da se države članice ne morejo dogovoriti o najprimernejši metodologiji razvoja informacijske tehnologije in da se soočajo z omejenimi človeškimi in finančnimi viri;
is concerned that the Commission and the Member States are lagging behind this very important reform in the situation where the collection of own resources is less than satisfactory;
je zaskrbljen, ker Komisija in države članice zaostajajo pri tej nadvse pomembni reformi v razmerah, ko je zbiranje lastnih sredstev manj kot zadovoljivo;
Calls on the Commission to make an evaluation of the cost of postponing full application of the MCC, quantifying the budgetary consequences of such postponement;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi oceno stroškov odlaganja polne uporabe posodobljenega carinskega zakonika, ki bi v številkah pokazala posledice takšnega odlaganja za proračun;
Points to a study commissioned by Parliament on the ‘Implementation of the Modernised Customs Code’ [26], from which it results that, in the best-case scenario, the entry into force of the MCC (which will be called the Union’s Customs Code if the recast proposal by the Commission is adopted) could take place in December 2017;
opozarja na študijo po naročilu Parlamenta o izvajanju posodobljenega carinskega zakonika [26], iz katere je razvidno, da bi posodobljeni carinski zakonik (ki se bo imenoval carinski zakonik Unije, če bo sprejet predlog Komisije za prenovitev) v najboljšem primeru lahko začel veljati decembra 2017;
reminds the Commission that the Union has exclusive competence in the area of the customs union and that it should, therefore, ensure compliance by the Member States;
opozarja Komisijo, da ima Unija izključno pristojnost na področju carinske unije in bi zato morala zagotoviti, da bi države članice spoštovale pravila;
calls on the Commission, as a consequence, to step up its efforts to ensure that the MCC is implemented at the earliest possible date, and in any event to avoid the worst-case scenario indicated in the study for March 2033;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj si še bolj prizadeva poskrbeti, da se bo posodobljeni carinski zakonik začel uporabljati čim prej, in naj v vsakem primeru prepreči najslabši možni izid, ki ga navaja študija za marec 2033;
Deplores the fact that two important initiatives aimed at combating VAT fraud, namely the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards a quick reaction mechanism against VAT fraud (COM(2012) 428) and the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards an optional and temporary application of the reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud (COM(2009) 511), are blocked in the Council;
obžaluje dejstvo, da Svet zadržuje dve pomembni pobudi, katerih cilj je boj proti goljufijam na področju DDV, in sicer predlog direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost glede mehanizma za hiter odziv v primerih goljufij na področju DDV (COM(2012) 428) in predlog direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2006/112/ES v zvezi z neobvezno in začasno uporabo mehanizma obrnjene davčne obveznosti za dobavo nekaterega blaga in storitev, dovzetnih za goljufije (COM(2009) 511);
Welcomes the fact that EUROFISC, a common operational structure allowing Member States to react rapidly to cross-border VAT fraud, became fully operational;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je EUROFISC, skupna operativna struktura, ki državam članicam omogoča hitro odzivanje na čezmejne goljufije na področju DDV, začel v celoti delovati;
notes that a specific working field was created in February 2011 in order to exchange targeted information on fraudulent transactions using the customs procedure 42;
ugotavlja, da je bilo februarja 2011 oblikovano posebno delovno področje za izmenjavo ciljno usmerjenih informacij o goljufivih transakcijah pri uporabi carinskega postopka 42;
Calls on the Commission to strengthen its coordination with the Member States in order to collect reliable data on the customs and VAT gap in the respective countries and to report on a regular basis to Parliament in that regard;
poziva Komisijo, naj tesneje sodeluje z državami članicami, da bo mogoče zbrati zanesljive podatke o izpadu carin in DDV v teh državah, ter o tem redno poroča Parlamentu;
GNI-based revenue – the volume of tax evasion and avoidance and its impact on the Union budget and the economies of the Member States
Prihodki iz naslova BND – obseg davčnih utaj in izogibanja davkom ter njihov učinek na proračun Unije in gospodarstvo držav članic
Welcomes the Commission’s Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion (COM(2012) 722);
pozdravlja akcijski načrt Komisije za krepitev boja proti davčnim goljufijam in davčnim utajam (COM(2012) 722);
commends, in particular, the Commission’s proposal to set up a Quick Reaction Mechanism and insists that this would enable Member States to respond more swiftly and efficiently to VAT fraud;
izraža priznanje Komisiji, zlasti za predlog o vzpostavitvi mehanizma za hitro odzivanje, in vztraja, da bo to državam članicam omogočilo, da bodo v primerih goljufij na področju DDV hitreje in učinkoviteje ukrepale;
stresses that the potential cost of tax evasion and avoidance for Member States is estimated to amount to EUR 1 trillion every year while in comparison, the Union budget for 2011 in terms of appropriations for commitments amounted only to EUR 142,5 billion;
poudarja, da so morebitni stroški davčnih utaj in izogibanja davkom za države članice ocenjeni na približno 1 bilijon EUR letno, medtem ko so – za primerjavo – prevzete obveznosti v proračunu Unije v letu 2011 znašale samo 142,5 milijarde EUR;