natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Regulation fixes fishing opportunities for 2012 for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in the Black Sea.
Ta uredba določa ribolovne možnosti za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki se za leto 2012 uporabljajo v Črnem morju.
‘GFCM’ means General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean;
„GRKS“ pomeni Generalno komisijo za ribištvo v Sredozemlju;
‘Black Sea’ means the GFCM geographical sub-area as defined in resolution GFCM/33/2009/2;
„Črno morje“ pomeni zemljepisno podobmočje GRKS, kot je opredeljeno v Resoluciji GFCM/33/2009/2;
‘total allowable catch’ (TAC) means the quantity that can be taken from each stock each year;
„celotni dovoljeni ulov“ (TAC) pomeni količino, ki jo je vsako leto mogoče naloviti iz posameznega staleža;
‘quota’ means a proportion of the TAC allocated to the Union, a Member State or a third country.
„kvota“ pomeni delež celotnih dovoljenih ulovov, dodeljen Uniji, državi članici ali tretji državi.
The TACs, the allocation of such TACs among Member States, and conditions functionally linked thereto, where appropriate, are set out in the Annex.
TAC, dodelitve teh TAC državam članicam in pogoji, ki so z njimi funkcionalno povezani, če je to ustrezno, so določeni v Prilogi.
The allocation of fishing opportunities among Member States as set out in this Regulation shall be without prejudice to:
Dodelitev ribolovnih možnosti državam članicam, kakor je določena v tej uredbi, ne posega v:
additional landings allowed pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96;
dodatna iztovarjanja, dovoljena na podlagi člena 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 847/96;
Fish from stocks for which TACs are established shall be retained on board or landed only if:
Ribe iz staležev, za katere so določeni TAC, se ne smejo obdržati na krovu ali iztovarjati, razen če:
the catches consist of a share in a Union quota which has not been allocated by quota among Member States, and that Union quota has not been exhausted.
je ulov sestavljen iz deleža kvote Unije, ki državam članicam ni bil dodeljen s kvotami, in kvota Unije ni bila izčrpana.
When, pursuant to Articles 33 and 34 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, Member States send the Commission data relating to landings of quantities of stocks caught, they shall use the stock codes set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Če države članice na podlagi členov 33 in 34 Uredbe (ES) št. 1224/2009 pošljejo Komisiji podatke v zvezi z iztovarjanjem količine ujetih staležev, uporabijo kode staležev iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
The following tables set out the TACs and quotas (in tonnes live weight, except where otherwise specified) by stock, and conditions functionally linked thereto, where appropriate.
V naslednjih tabelah so določeni TAC in kvote (v tonah žive teže, razen če ni določeno drugače) po staležu ter po potrebi pogoji, ki so z njimi funkcionalno povezani.
Fish stocks are referred to following the alphabetical order of the Latin names of the species.
Staleži rib so navedeni po abecednem redu latinskih imen vrste.
Alpha-3 code
Tričrkovna oznaka
Zone EU waters in the Black Sea
Cona Vode EU v Črnem morju
No fishing activity, transhipment, taking on board and landing shall be permitted from 15 April to 15 June 2012.
Od 15. aprila do 15. junija 2012 ni dovoljena nobena ribiška aktivnost, pretovarjanje, sprejemanje na krov ali iztovarjanje.
SPR/F37.4.2.C
SPR/ F37.4.2.C
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 6/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 6/2012
of 5 January 2012
z dne 5. januarja 2012
Done at Brussels, 5 January 2012.
V Bruslju, 5. januarja 2012
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 7/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 7/2012
On 12 October and 28 November 2011 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council approved updates to the list of individuals and entities subject to the freezing of assets.
Odbor za sankcije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov je 12. oktobra in 28. novembra 2011 potrdil posodobitve seznama oseb in subjektov, za katere velja zamrznitev sredstev.
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1183/2005 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
The following entries shall be added under the heading ‘A. Natural persons’:
Pod naslov „A. Fizične osebe“ se dodajo naslednji vnosi:
‘Jamil Mukulu (alias (a) Professor Musharaf, (b) Steven Alirabaki, (c) David Kyagulanyi (d) Musezi Talengelanimiro (e) Mzee Tutu (f) Abdullah Junjuaka (g) Alilabaki Kyagulanyi, (h) Hussein Muhammad (i) Nicolas Luumu (j) Talengelanimiro. Date of birth: (a) 1965 (b) 1 January 1964. Place of birth: Ntoke Village, Ntenjeru Sub County, Kayunga District, Uganda
„Jamil Mukulu (tudi (a) profesor Musharaf, (b) Steven Alirabaki, (c) David Kyagulanyi (d) Musezi Talengelanimiro (e) Mzee Tutu (f) Abdullah Junjuaka (g) Alilabaki Kyagulanyi, (h) Hussein Muhammad (i) Nicolas Luumu (j) Talengelanimiro. Datum rojstva: (a) 1965 (b) 1. januar 1964. Kraj rojstva: vas Ntoke, podokraj Ntenjeru, okrožje Kayunga, Uganda
Function: (a) Head of the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) (b) Commander, Allied Democratic Forces.
Položaj: (a) vodja zavezniških demokratičnih sil (Allied Democratic Forces) (b) poveljnik, zavezniških demokratičnih sil.
Other information: According to open-source and official reporting, including the UNSC DRC Sanctions Committee’s Group of Experts’ reports, Jamil Mukulu is the military leader of the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), a foreign armed group operating in the DRC that impedes the disarmament and voluntary repatriation or resettlement of ADF combatants, as described in paragraph 4(b) of resolution 1857 (2008).
Druge informacije: Iz javno dostopnih virov in uradnih poročil, tudi poročil strokovne skupine Odbora VS ZN za sankcije v DR Kongo, izhaja, da je Jamil Mukulu vojaški vodja Zavezniških demokratičnih sil, tj. tuje oborožene skupine, ki deluje v DR Kongo ter ovira razoroževanje in prostovoljno vračanje oziroma ponovno naseljevanje borcev Zavezniških demokratičnih sil, kakor je navedeno v odstavku 4(b) Resolucije VS ZN 1857 (2008).
The UNSC DRC Sanction Committee’s Group of Experts has reported that Jamil Mukulu has provided leadership and material support to the ADF, an armed group operating in the territory of the DRC.
Strokovna skupina Odbora VS ZN za sankcije v DR Kongo je poročala, da je Mukulu vodil oborožene Zavezniške demokratične sile na ozemlju DR Kongo in jim zagotavljal materialno podporo.
According to multiple sources including the UNSC DRC Sanctions Committee’s Group of Experts’ reports, Jamil Mukulu has also continued to exercise influence over the policies, provided financing, and maintained direct command and control over the activities of ADF forces in the field, including overseeing links with international terrorist networks.
Iz več virov, tudi iz poročil strokovne skupine Odbora VS ZN za sankcije v DR Kongo, izhaja tudi, da je Jamil Mukulu stalno vplival na politiko, zagotavljal finančno podporo ter neposredno poveljeval Zavezniškim demokratičnim silam in nadziral njihove dejavnosti na terenu, nadziral pa je tudi naveze z mednarodnimi terorističnimi mrežami.
Date of designation referred to in Article 5(1)(b): 12.10.2011.’
Datum uvrstitve na seznam iz člena 5(1)(b): 12. 10. 2011.“
Function: Commander-in-Chief, Nduma Defence of Congo, Mayi Mayi Sheka group.
Položaj: vrhovni poveljnik obrambnih sil Nduma (Nduma Defence) v Kongu, skupina Mayi Mayi Sheka.
Other information: Ntabo Ntaberi Sheka, Commander-in-Chief of the political branch of the Mayi Mayi Sheka, is the political leader of a Congolese armed group that impedes the disarmament, demobilisation, or reintegration of combatants.
Druge informacije: Ntabo Ntaberi Sheka, glavni poveljnik politične veje skupine Mayi Mayi Sheka, je politični vodja kongovske oborožene skupine, ki ovira razoroževanje, demobilizacijo oziroma ponovno vključevanje borcev.
The Mayi Mayi Sheka group has carried out attacks on mines in eastern DRC, including taking over the Bisiye mines and extorting from locals.
Ta skupina je izvedla napade na rudnike v vzhodnem selu DR Kongo ter med drugim prevzela rudnike Bidiye in jih odvzela lokalnim prebivalcem.
Ntabo Ntaberi Sheka planned and ordered a series of attacks in Walikale territory from 30 July to 2 August 2010, to punish local populations accused of collaborating with Congolese government forces.
V obdobju od 30. julija do 2. avgusta 2010 je načrtoval in naročil več napadov na ozemlju Walikale, da bi kaznoval lokalne prebivalce, ki naj bi sodelovali s kongovskimi vladnimi silami.
In the course of the attacks, children were raped and were abducted, subjected to forced labour and subjected to cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment.
V napadih so bili otroci posiljeni in ugrabljeni, opravljali so prisilno delo ter bili deležni okrutnega, nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja.
The Mayi Mayi Sheka militia group also forcibly recruits boys and holds children in their ranks from recruitment drives.
Milica Mayi Mayi Sheka prav tako prisilno rekrutira dečke in jih na podlagi rekrutiranja zadržuje v svojih vrstah.
Date of designation referred to in Article 5(1)(b): 28.11.2011.’
Datum uvrstitve na seznam iz člena 5(1)(b): 28.
Date of birth: 4 April 1976.
Datum rojstva: 4. april 1976.
Place of birth: Walikale Territory, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Kraj rojstva: ozemlje Walikale, Demokratična republika Kongo
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 8/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 8/2012
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 9/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 9/2012
Those prices and duties were last amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 4/2012 [4].
Navedene cene in uvozne dajatve so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 4/2012 [4].
OJ L 2, 5.1.2012, p. 3.
UL L 2, 5.1.2012, str. 3.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 7 January 2012
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 7. januarja 2012
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 10/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 10/2012
fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for olive oil lodged from 2 to 3 January 2012 under the Tunisian tariff quota and suspending the issue of import licences for the month of January 2012
o določitvi koeficienta dodelitve, ki se bo uporabil za zahtevke za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj za oljčno olje, vložene od 2. in 3. januarja 2012 v okviru tunizijske tarifne kvote, in o začasni ukinitvi izdaje uvoznih dovoljenj za mesec januar 2012
The quantities for which import licence applications were lodged for 2 and 3 January 2012 under Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1918/2006 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 91,091273 %.
Za zahtevke za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj, vložene od 2. in 3. januarja 2012 v skladu s členom 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1918/2006, se določi koeficient dodelitve 91,091273 %.
The issue of import licences in respect of amounts applied for as from 9 January 2012 shall be suspended for January 2012.
Izdaja uvoznih dovoljenj za količine, zahtevane od 9. januarja 2012, se za januar 2012 začasno ukine.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 January 2012.
Ta uredba začne veljati 7. januarja 2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 11/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 11/2012
of 9 January 2012
z dne 9. januarja 2012
Done at Brussels, 9 January 2012.
V Bruslju, 9. januarja 2012
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 12/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 12/2012
of 10 January 2012
z dne 10. januarja 2012
Done at Brussels, 10 January 2012.
V Bruslju, 10. januarja 2012
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 13/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 13/2012
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) and Article 11(3), (5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), ter zlasti člena 9(4) ter členov 11(3), (5) in (6) Uredbe,
The measures consisted of an ad valorem anti-dumping duty ranging between 0 % and 62,6 % imposed on imports from individually named exporting producers, with a residual duty rate of 53,3 % on imports from all other companies.
Ti ukrepi so bili v obliki protidampinške dajatve ad valorem v višini od 0 % do 62,6 % uvedeni na uvoz posamično navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, na uvoz vseh drugih družb pa je bila uvedena stopnja preostale dajatve v višini 53,3 %.
In August 2001, the Commission, by Decision 2001/645/EC [3], accepted price undertakings offered by five Indian producers.
Komisija je avgusta 2001 z Odločbo 2001/645/ES [3] sprejela cenovne zaveze, ki jih je ponudilo pet indijskih proizvajalcev.
The acceptance of the undertakings was subsequently withdrawn [4] in March 2006.
Sprejetje zavez je bilo pozneje umaknjeno [4] marca 2006.
In March 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 366/2006 [5], the Council amended the measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.
Svet je marca 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 366/2006 [5] spremenil ukrepe, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001.
The anti-dumping duty imposed ranged between 0 % and 18 %, taking into account the findings of the expiry review of the definitive countervailing duties which are detailed in Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [6].
Uvedena protidampinška dajatev je znašala med 0 % in 18 % ob upoštevanju ugotovitev pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa dokončnih izravnalnih dajatev, ki so podrobno opisane v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006 [6].
In September 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 1424/2006 [7], the Council, following a new exporting producer request, amended Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 in respect of one Indian exporter.
Svet je septembra 2006 na zahtevo novega proizvajalca izvoznika z Uredbo (ES) št. 1424/2006 [7] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 v zvezi z enim indijskim izvoznikom.
The amended Regulation established a dumping margin of 15,5 % for cooperating companies not included in the sample and an anti-dumping duty rate of 3,5 % for the company concerned taking into account the company’s export subsidy margin as ascertained in the anti-subsidy investigation which led to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Spremenjena uredba je določila stopnjo dampinga za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, v višini 15,5 % in stopnjo protidampinške dajatve za zadevno družbo v višini 3,5 % ob upoštevanju stopnje izvozne subvencije za to družbo, kot je bila ugotovljena v protisubvencijski preiskavi, na podlagi katere je bila sprejeta Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006.
In November 2007, by Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 [8], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of PET film originating in India following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Svet je novembra 2007 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2007 [8] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
By the same Regulation a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the examination of dumping in respect of one Indian exporting producer was terminated.
Z isto uredbo se je v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe zaključil delni vmesni pregled, po obsegu omejen na preučitev dampinga za enega indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The last amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 in this regard was made by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 806/2010 [9].
Uredba (ES) št. 1292/2007 je bila v zvezi s tem nazadnje spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 806/2010 [9].
In January 2009, by Regulation (EC) No 15/2009 [10], the Council, following a partial interim review initiated by the Commission on its own initiative concerning the subsidisation of five Indian PET film producers, amended the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed on these companies by Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 and the definitive countervailing duties imposed on these companies by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je januarja 2009 po delnem vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja petih indijskih proizvajalcev folije iz PET, ki ga je Komisija začela na lastno pobudo, z Uredbo (ES) št. 15/2009 [10] spremenil dokončno protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno za te družbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2007, in dokončne izravnalne dajatve, uvedene za te družbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
In May 2011, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 469/2011 [11], the Council amended Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 and thus adjusted the anti-dumping duty rates in view of the expiry on 9 March 2011 [12] of the countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je maja 2011 z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 469/2011 [11] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2007 in prilagodil stopnje protidampinških dajatev ob upoštevanju izteka veljavnosti 9. marca 2011 [12] za izravnalne dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
The applicant of this interim review — Ester Industries Limited — is currently subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty of 29,3 %.
Za vložnika – Ester Industries Limited – v tem vmesnem pregledu trenutno velja dokončna protidampinška dajatev v višini 29,3 %.
In July 2010, the Commission received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je julija 2010 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The request, limited in scope to the examination of dumping, was lodged by Ester Industries Limited, an exporting producer from India (‘Ester’ or ‘the applicant’).
Zahtevek, po obsegu omejen na preučitev dampinga, je vložila družba Ester Industries Limited, indijski proizvajalec izvoznik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „Ester“ ali „vložnik“).
The applicant provided prima facie evidence that the continued imposition of the measure at its current level was no longer necessary to offset injurious dumping.
Vložnik je predložil dokaze prima facie, da za izravnavo škodljivega dampinga nadaljevanje ukrepov na sedanji ravni ni več potrebno.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed to justify the initiation of a partial interim review, the Commission announced by a notice published on 29 October 2010 in the Official Journal of the European Union [13] (‘the Notice of Initiation’) the initiation of a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the examination of dumping in respect of the applicant.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, ki upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, zato je z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [13] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Obvestilo o začetku), 29. oktobra 2010 začela delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, po obsegu omejen na preučitev dampinga v zvezi z vložnikom.
The Notice of Initiation mentioned that the partial interim review would also assess the need, depending on the review findings, to amend the rate of duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from exporting producers in the country concerned not individually mentioned in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007, i.e. the anti-dumping duty rate as applying to ‘all other companies’ in India.
V obvestilu o začetku je omenjeno, da bo delni vmesni pregled na podlagi ugotovitev pregleda pokazal tudi potrebo po spremembi stopnje dajatve, ki velja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz zadevne države, ki niso posamično navedeni v členu 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2007, tj. stopnje protidampinške dajatve, ki velja za „vse druge družbe“ v Indiji.
The investigation of the level of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘the RIP’).
Preiskava stopnje dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2009 do 30. septembra 2010 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The Commission officially informed the applicant, the authorities of the exporting country and the Union industry of the initiation of the partial interim review investigation.
Komisija je vložnika, organe države izvoznice in industrijo Unije uradno obvestila o začetku preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom.
The product concerned by this review is the same as that defined in Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007, as last amended, imposing the measures in force, namely polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, originating in India, currently falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290.
Izdelek v tem pregledu je isti izdelek, kot ga opredeljuje Uredba (ES) št. 1292/2007, kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena in ki uvaja veljavne ukrepe, in sicer folija iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290.
As in previous investigations, this investigation has shown that PET film produced in India and exported to the Union and the PET film produced and sold domestically on the Indian market, as well as the PET film produced and sold in the EU by the Union producers, have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Ta preiskava je podobno kot prejšnje pokazala, da imajo folija iz PET, proizvedena v Indiji in izvožena v Unijo, folija iz PET, proizvedena in prodana na domačem indijskem trgu, ter folija iz PET, ki jo proizvajajo proizvajalci Unije in prodajajo v EU, iste osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter iste osnovne uporabe.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the applicant’s domestic sales of the like product to independent customers were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to at least 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej preučila, ali je bila vložnikova domača prodaja podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna, tj. ali je bil celoten obseg takšne prodaje vsaj enak 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza v Unijo.
The Commission subsequently identified those types of the like product sold domestically by the company that were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Union.
Nato je opredelila tiste vrste podobnega izdelka, ki jih je družba prodala na domačem trgu in so bile identične ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, izvoženimi v Unijo.
It was further examined whether the domestic sales of the applicant were representative for each product type, i.e. whether domestic sales of each product type constituted at least 5 % of the sales volume of the same product type to the Union.
Nato je bilo preučeno še, ali je bila vložnikova domača prodaja za posamezno vrsto izdelka reprezentativna, tj. ali je bila domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka vsaj enaka 5 % obsega prodaje iste vrste izdelka v Unijo.
The examination as to whether the domestic sales of each product type, sold domestically in representative quantities, could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade was made by establishing the proportion of the profitable sales to independent customers of the type in question.
Preiskava o tem, ali se lahko za domačo prodajo posamezne vrste izdelka, prodanega na domačem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah, upošteva, kot da je bila opravljena po običajnem poteku trgovine, je bila opravljena z določitvijo deleža dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam za zadevno vrsto.