natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Deplores the increase of the error rate to 4,0 % in the policy area ‘Agriculture and rural development’ covering the expenditures of the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and of the policy groups environment, fisheries and health;
obžaluje zvišanje stopnje napak na 4,0 % na področju „kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja“, ki pokriva odhodke Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS) in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) ter odhodke okoljske, ribiške in zdravstvene politike;
Recalls that the deterioration of the state of play in agriculture and, in particular, in rural development, is the main cause of the increase of the most likely error rate for all payments in the financial year 2011;
opozarja, da je poslabšanje stanja v kmetijstvu in zlasti razvoju podeželja glavni razlog za povečanje najverjetnejše stopnje napak za vsa plačila v proračunskem letu 2011;
Notes that even though 0,2 % of this error rate has been generated by a change in the Court of Auditors’ methodology concerning the cross compliance infringements the error rate for the entire agriculture policy area increased between 2010 and 2011 in real terms by 1,5 %:
ugotavlja, da se je stopnja napak za celotno področje kmetijske politike – kljub temu da je k njej 0,2 % prispevala sprememba metodologije Računskega sodišča v zvezi s kršitvami navzkrižne skladnosti – med letoma 2010 in 2011 realno povečala za poldrugo odstotno točko:
from 2,3 % in 2010 to 3,8 % in 2011 [27];
z 2,3 % leta 2010 na 3,8 % leta 2011 [27];
Takes note of the Court of Auditors’ approach which for the first time included cross compliance infringements in the calculation of the error rate as ‘cross- compliance obligations are substantive legal requirements that must be met by all recipients of direct aid and are the basic and in many cases the only conditions to be respected in order to justify the payments of full amount of direct payments’ [28];
je seznanjen s pristopom Računskega sodišča, ki je prvič vključilo kršitve navzkrižne skladnosti v izračun stopnje napak, saj „[so z]ahteve navzkrižne skladnosti […] vsebinske pravne zahteve, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati vsi prejemniki neposredne pomoči. To so osnovni in pogosto edini pogoji, ki jih je treba izpolnjevati, da je upravičeno izplačilo polnega zneska neposrednih plačil“ [28];
asks the Court of Auditors in this context to further explain and justify its changes of methodology;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj s tega vidika podrobneje pojasni in utemelji spremembe metodologije;
calls on the Commission and the Court of Auditors to agree on a consistent methodology with a view to rendering the yearly budget implementation figures more comparable;
poziva Komisijo in Računsko sodišče, naj metodologijo uskladita, da bo mogoče bolje primerjati rezultate pri izvrševanju proračuna v posameznih letih;
Takes note that the Court of Auditors restricts its audit only to certain Statutory Management Requirements and to the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition requirements and that ‘the error rate must be used with great care and not be treated as an overall assessment of the respect of the cross compliance obligations by farmers’ [29];
je seznanjen s tem, da je revizija Računskega sodišča omejena samo na nekatere predpisane zahteve glede ravnanja in zahteve za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje ter da „je treba stopnjo napak uporabljati zelo skrbno in da se ta ne sme obravnavati kot splošna ocena upoštevanja obveznosti navzkrižne skladnosti med kmetovalci“ [29];
Notes that it is up to the Member States to define ‘good agricultural and ecological condition’ and to which acreage it will be applied;
ugotavlja, da države članice same opredelijo „dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje“ in površino, za katero se bodo uporabljali;
criticises strongly the fact that beneficiaries who very often are not farmers will receive direct payments;
odločno obsoja dejstvo, da bodo tako upravičenci, ki zelo pogosto niso kmeti, prejemali neposredna plačila;
considers this to be an incorrect allocation of funds which could be saved;
meni, da gre v tem primeru za zmotno dodelitev sredstev, ki bi se lahko prihranila;
Takes note that Member States recovered EUR 172,7 million from the beneficiaries during the 2011 financial year and that the overall outstanding amount still to be recovered from the beneficiaries at year-end was EUR 1206,9 million, of which EUR 458 million has been charged to the Member States for EAGF expenditure in line with the 50/50 rule;
je seznanjen, da so države članice v proračunskem letu 2011 od upravičencev izterjale 172,7 milijona EUR in da je ob koncu tega leta skupni neizterjani znesek znašal 1206,9 milijona EUR, od česar je bilo 458 milijonov EUR zaračunanih državam članicam za odhodke iz proračunske vrstice Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada v skladu s pravilom 50/50;
acknowledges that around EUR 25,7 million will be borne by the Union budget for cases reported irrecoverable during financial year 2011;
je seznanjen, da bo iz proračuna Unije približno 25,7 milijona EUR porabljenih za kritje dolgov, za katere je bilo v proračunskem letu 2011 prejeto poročilo, da so neizterljivi;
points out that DG AGRI cleared all pending non-recovered cases dating from 2006 or 2002 by Decision 2011/272/EU [30] of 29 April 2011 and that following the application of the 50/50 rule, EUR 27,8 million was charged to the Member States while EUR 29,2 million was borne by the Union budget for reasons of irrecoverability;
poudarja, da je GD AGRI s sklepom 2011/272/EU [30] z dne 29. aprila 2011 zaprl vse nerešene primere neizterjanega dolga po letu 2006 oziroma 2002 in da je bilo v skladu s pravilom 50/50 zaradi neizterljivosti državam članicam zaračunanih 27,8 milijona EUR, 29,2 milijona EUR pa je bilo plačanih iz proračuna Unije;
Welcomes the fact that for the first time, the Court of Auditors provides two specific assessments:
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Računsko sodišče prvič pripravilo dve posebni oceni:
on the market and direct support on the one hand, and on rural development on the other hand and considers that it provides a better insight into each policy area;
na eni strani oceno trga in neposredne pomoči, na drugi strani oceno razvoja podeželja, ter meni, da s tem zagotavlja boljši vpogled v vsako od obeh področij politike;
calls on the Court of Auditors, however, to present the error rate for rural development separately from environment, fisheries and health and not on an aggregate basis;
vseeno ga poziva, naj predloži stopnjo napak za razvoj podeželja ločeno od področja okolja, ribištva in zdravja, in ne na skupni osnovi;
Welcomes the register providing information on beneficiaries of the Common Agricultural Policy payments in the Member States;
pozdravlja register, ki zagotavlja informacije o upravičencih plačil skupne kmetijske politike v državah članicah;
considers this tool to be an important step towards more transparency in the agricultural sector;
meni, da je to orodje pomemben korak, ki lahko zagotovi večjo preglednost v kmetijskem sektorju;
recalls, nevertheless, that in accordance with the ruling of the European Court of Justice of 9 November 2010 invalidating the legislation as regards natural persons [31], Commission Regulation (EC) No 259/2008 [32] has been modified limiting the obligation to publish information on the beneficiaries of CAP payments to legal persons;
kljub temu opozarja, da je bila Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 259/2008 [31] v skladu s sodbo Sodišča Evropske unije z dne 9. novembra 2010, ki razveljavlja zakonodajo v zvezi s fizičnimi osebami [32], tako da omejuje obveznost objavljanja informacij o upravičencih do plačil skupne kmetijske politike na pravne osebe;
notes the Commission’s proposal for new transparency rules, adopted on 25 September 2012, to make it obligatory for Member States to disclose data of all beneficiaries including natural persons, except for beneficiaries whose annual aid does not exceed a certain de minimis threshold, taking into consideration the objections made in the judgment of the Court of Justice, in particular on data protection concerns;
je seznanjen s predlogom Komisije za nova pravila o preglednosti, sprejetim 25. septembra 2012, po katerem naj bi bile države članice obvezane razkriti podatke o vseh upravičencih, vključno s fizičnimi osebami, razen tistih, pri katerih letni znesek pomoči ne presega določenega minimalnega praga; ugotavlja, da je pri tem upoštevala pripombe iz sodbe Sodišča Evropske unije, zlasti pomisleke o varstvu podatkov;
Takes note of the current practice in the management of Sapard funds, namely that funds are only exceptionally recovered in full if the fraudulent behaviour for a part of the project has artificially created the conditions without which the beneficiary would not have obtained support for the project at all;
je seznanjen s prakso pri upravljanju sklada Sapard, namreč da se sredstva v celoti izterjajo samo izjemoma, če je upravičenec za del projekta predstavil lažne okoliščine, brez katerih sploh ne bi nikoli dobil podpore za projekt;
expresses concern about the current practice, recommended by the Commission to the Sapard agency, that a project of which a part has been affected by fraudulent behaviour can be deemed eligible for funding if the project is not deemed to be of an artificial nature, i.e. the percentage of the costs of all the affected elements does not exceed 50 % of the total costs of the entire project;
je zaskrbljen zaradi obstoječe prakse, ki jo je agenciji za Sapard priporočila Komisija, namreč da je projekt, ki je delno goljufive narave, lahko upravičen do financiranja, če ne velja za lažnega, tj. če delež stroškov vseh sestavin, ki so lažne, ne presega 50 % celotnih stroškov projekta;
is especially concerned about the lack of deterrence from fraudulent behaviour this practice exhibits;
je še posebej zaskrbljen zaradi tega, ker ta praksa prosilcev sploh ne odvrača od goljufivega ravnanja;
Market and direct support
Tržna in neposredna podpora
Regrets that the EAGF payments are not free from material error in 2011, the most likely error rate being estimated by the Court of Auditors at 2,9 %, and that the control systems audited by the Court of Auditors in Austria, Finland, Hungary, Italy and Spain were found to be only partially effective in assuring the legality and regularity of payments;
obžaluje, da plačila iz EKJS leta 2011 niso brez pomembnih napak, saj je Računsko sodišče ocenilo, da znaša najverjetnejša stopnja napak 2,9 %, in da je pri reviziji nadzornih sistemov v Avstriji, na Finskem, Madžarskem, v Italiji in Španiji ugotovilo, da so le delno učinkoviti pri zagotavljanju zakonitosti in pravilnosti plačil;
Notes that the most frequent accuracy error relates to area over-declarations, most of which amount individually to less than 5 % and deplores that the larger error rates relate to cases where eligibility of permanent pasture was incorrectly assessed and recorded by Member States’ authorities in the Land and Parcel Identification System (LPIS);
ugotavlja, da se najpogostejša napaka v zvezi s točnostjo nanaša na čezmerne prijave površine, večina teh pa posamično znaša manj kot 5 %, in obžaluje, da se večje stopnje napak nanašajo na primere, pri katerih so organi držav članic v identifikacijskih sistemih za enote rabe ali poljine neustrezno ocenili in evidentirali upravičenost trajnih pašnikov;
Endorses the recommendation of the Court of Auditors that the correct assessment of eligibility of permanent pasture should be ensured [33];
zato v celoti podpira priporočilo Računskega sodišča, da je treba zagotoviti pravilno oceno upravičenosti trajnih pašnikov [33];
Notes with disappointment that the Court of Auditors found that the effectiveness of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) is adversely affected by inaccurate data in the various databases and also by an incorrect administrative treatment of claims by the paying agencies in certain Member States;
z razočaranjem ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče odkrilo, da na učinkovitost integriranega upravnega in kontrolnega sistema (IACS) negativno vplivajo netočni podatki v različnih podatkovnih zbirkah in tudi nepravilno upravno obravnavanje zahtevkov plačilnih agencij v nekaterih državah članicah;
reminds the Commission that the introduction of IACS led to a decrease in errors and calls on the Commission to remedy the situation without any delays using suspensions and interruptions of funding when necessary;
opominja Komisijo, da se je število napak po uvedbi sistema IACS korenito zmanjšalo, in poziva k takojšnji rešitvi nastale situacije, po potrebi s prekinitvami in začasnimi ustavitvami plačil;
Is concerned that the Commission, in its annual activity report, maintained its reservations concerning the IACS systems in Bulgaria and Portugal due to serious deficiencies;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Komisija v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih znova izrazila zadržke glede sistema IACS v Bolgariji in na Portugalskem, in sicer zaradi hudih pomanjkljivosti;
emphasises the fact that, given the importance of IACS for the management and control of agricultural expenditure, serious deficiencies in its set-up and operation exposes the Commission to reputational risk, even if the financial impact does not exceed the materiality threshold;
poudarja, da bi bil lahko zaradi hudih pomanjkljivosti v sistemu IACS, ki je zelo pomemben za upravljanje in nadzor odhodkov na področju kmetijstva, ugled Komisije ogrožen, četudi finančne posledice ne bodo presegle praga pomembnosti;
Regrets that some systematic failures in the management and controls systems observed and reported already in previous years have not been remedied:
obžaluje, da nekatere sistematične pomanjkljivosti sistemov upravljanja in nadzora, ugotovljene in prijavljene že v prejšnjih letih, niso bile odpravljene:
incorrect classification of land use, overstatement of eligible land in LPIS or incorrect application of the obvious error concept;
nepravilno razvrščanje rabe zemljišč, previsoke navedbe upravičenih zemljišč v identifikacijskih sistemih za enote rabe ali poljine in nepravilna uporaba pojma očitnih napak;
Deplores the fact that deficiencies were found by the Court of Auditors in on-the-spot measurements;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče odkrilo pomanjkljivosti pri meritvah na terenu;
insists that on-the-spot inspections should be of the quality necessary to identify the eligible area in a reliable manner [34].
vztraja, da morajo biti inšpekcijski pregledi na kraju samem dovolj kakovostni, da bodo omogočili zanesljivo ugotovitev upravičene površine [34];
Regrets that the quality of the work performed by the certifying bodies audited by the Court of Auditors under the new voluntary procedure for the reinforcement of assurance is insufficient;
obžaluje neustrezno kakovost dela certifikacijskih organov, ki so bili predmet revizije Računskega sodišča v okviru novega prostovoljnega postopka za okrepitev zagotovil;
Calls on the Commission to take all necessary actions so that paying agencies remedy weaknesses detected in their administration and control system;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da plačilne agencije odpravijo pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene v njihovih upravnih in kontrolnih sistemih;
insists that the design and quality of the work to be performed by certifying bodies must be improved in order to provide reliable assessment of legality and regularity of operations in the paying agencies;
vztraja, da je treba načrt in kakovost dela, ki ga morajo opravljati certifikacijski organi, izboljšati, da bi lahko zagotovili zanesljivo oceno zakonitosti in pravilnosti operacij v plačilnih agencijah;
asks the Commission to investigate if it is possible to cooperate with private individuals to verify cross compliance standards and reduce administrative burden;
poziva Komisijo, naj poskusi preučiti, ali bi bilo mogoče sodelovati z zasebniki, da se preverijo standardi navzkrižne skladnosti in zmanjša upravno breme;
Regrets that payments in the policy sector ‘rural development, environment, fisheries and health’ are not free from material error in 2011, the most likely error being estimated by the Court of Auditors at 7,7 %, and that the examined supervisory and control systems were partially effective;
obžaluje, da plačila na področju politike „razvoj podeželja, okolje, ribištvo in zdravje“ leta 2011 niso brez pomembnih napak, saj je Računsko sodišče ocenilo, da najverjetnejša stopnja napak znaša 7,7 %, in da so bili preverjeni nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi le delno učinkoviti;
Notes that the major part of the most likely error rate concern the eligibility of non-area-related measures such as modernisation of agricultural holdings and the setting up of basic services for the economy and rural population, partly due to the often complex rules and eligibility conditions;
ugotavlja, da se največji delež najverjetnejše stopnje napak nanaša na upravičenost ukrepov, ki niso povezani s površino, kot sta posodabljanje kmetijskih gospodarstev in uvedba osnovnih storitev za gospodarstvo in podeželsko prebivalstvo, deloma zaradi pogosto zapletenih pravil in pogojev za upravičenost;
Expresses concern about the fact that many errors were detected when beneficiaries were public bodies, such as municipalities or the paying agency itself [35] and that those errors concerned issues such as declaring ineligible VAT or not complying with public procurement;
je zaskrbljen tudi zaradi dejstva, da so bile številne napake odkrite v primerih, ko so bili upravičenci javna telesa, kot so mestne občine ali sama plačilna agencija [35], in da so se te napake nanašale na zadeve, kot je navajanje neupravičenega DDV ali neizpolnjevanje pravil o javnem naročanju;
calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the existing rules are better enforced;
zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo boljše izvrševanje obstoječih pravil:
Reiterates its regrets that the Commission follows different methodologies to quantify public procurement errors in the two policy areas agriculture and cohesion both of which being furthermore not in line with the Court of Auditors’ methodology and calls on the Commission and the Court of Auditors to harmonise the treatment of public procurement errors in these two policy areas urgently [36];
ponovno izraža obžalovanje, da Komisija uporablja različni metodologiji za merjenje napak pri javnih naročilih na področjih politike kmetijstva in kohezije, ki poleg tega nista v skladu z metodologijo Računskega sodišča, ter poziva Komisijo in Računsko sodišče, naj nujno uskladita obravnavanje napak pri javnem naročanju na omenjenih področjih politike [36];
Notes that the Court of Auditors identifies significant problems concerning the implementation of cross-compliance requirements for the identification and registration of animals [37];
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče opazilo večje težave pri izvajanju zahtev navzkrižne skladnosti na področju identifikacije in registracije živali [37];
calls on the Member States to improve the quality of checks throughout the year without imposing an additional administrative load on the beneficiaries;
poziva države članice, naj izboljšajo kakovost pregledov skozi vse leto, ne da bi upravičencem naložile dodatno administrativno breme;
Regrets that weaknesses were identified by the Court of Auditors in the supervisory and control systems of the Member States for rural development and that the three elements audited were affected by deficiencies:
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče v nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemih držav članic za razvoj podeželja odkrilo pomanjkljivosti in da so bile te ugotovljene v vseh treh revidiranih sistemih:
i.e. the administrative and controls systems to ensure correct payment, the control systems based on physical on-the-spot checks and systems to ensure implementation and control of cross compliance;
tj. upravnih in nadzornih sistemih, ki zagotavljalo pravilno plačilo, nadzornih sistemih na podlagi fizičnih pregledov na kraju samem ter sistemih za zagotavljanje izvajanja in nadzora navzkrižne skladnosti;
Calls on the Commission to take account of findings identified by the Court of Auditors when establishing the audit strategy of DG AGRI’s clearance of accounts;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri oblikovanju revizijske strategije GD AGRI za revizije v okviru potrditve obračunov upošteva ugotovitve Računskega sodišča;
Is particularly worried about DG AGRI management representation as the Annual Activity report does not provide for an explanation of why the residual error rate for rural development had ‘increased significantly compared to the previous year’ [38];
je še posebej zaskrbljen zaradi poslovodske predstavitve GD AGRI, saj letno poročilo o dejavnostih ne vsebuje pojasnila, zakaj se je stopnja preostalih napak za razvoj podeželja „močno zvišala v primerjavi z letom prej“ [38];
Notes that according to the Court of Auditors the DG AGRI residual error rate is much lower than the Court of Auditors’ finding because it is ‘based on figures reported by the Member States for 2010, and as identified in the Courts audit, Member States do no detect or report all ineligible expenditure due to weaknesses in their checks of paying agencies’ [39];
ugotavlja, da je stopnja preostalih napak GD AGRI po mnenju Računskega sodišča veliko nižja od izračuna Računskega sodišča zato, ker slednji „temelji na izračunih, ki so jih posredovale države članice za leto 2010, in kot je bilo ugotovljeno z revizijo, države članice zaradi pomanjkljivega preverjanja plačilnih agencij ne odkrijejo ali prijavijo vseh neupravičenih odhodkov“ [39];
Is particularly concerned by the fact that DG AGRI considers that ‘in general Member States are improving their management and control systems for rural expenditure’ [40] while the audit of the Court of Auditors shows that the supervisory and control systems in Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Italy and Spain were not effective or only partially effective [41];
je še posebno zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, ker GD AGRI meni, da „države članice na splošno izboljšujejo svoje sisteme upravljanja in nadzora odhodkov za razvoj podeželja“ [40], medtem ko revizija Računskega sodišča razkriva, da nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi na Danskem, Finskem in Madžarskem ter v Italiji in Španiji niso učinkoviti ali so le delno učinkoviti [41];
is of the opinion that such a big divergence between the assessments of the Commission and the Court of Auditors makes it difficult for the discharge authority to reach objective conclusions;
meni, da organ za razrešnico zaradi tako velikega razhajanja med ocenama Komisije in Računskega sodišča težko izpelje objektivne sklepe;
insists on data exchange between the Court of Auditors and the Commission to facilitate coordinated back casting for past periods in order to ensure a reliable database for future comparisons;
vztraja pri izmenjavi podatkov med Računskim sodiščem in Komisijo, da se zagotovi usklajena retrospektivna analiza za pretekla obdobja in zanesljiva podatkovna zbirka za prihodnje primerjave;
is convinced of the usefulness of tripartite meetings between the Court of Auditors, the Commission and representatives from Member States concerned when looking for common analysis;
je prepričan, da so tristranska srečanja med Računskim sodiščem, Komisijo in predstavniki zadevnih držav članic koristna za opredelitev skupne analize;
Calls, therefore, on the Commission to take the necessary measures in order to reduce the error rate in rural development and welcomes the fact that DG AGRI has set up a working group to assess the root causes of rural development errors and develop corrective actions for the current and future programming periods;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da se zmanjša stopnja napak pri razvoju podeželja, in pozdravlja dejstvo, da je GD AGRI oblikoval delovno skupino, ki bo ocenila osnovne vzroke napak na področju razvoja podeželja ter razvila popravne ukrepe za tekoče in prihodnje programsko obdobje;