natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers (OJ L 31, 6.2.2003, p. 18).
Direktiva Sveta 2003/9/ES z dne 27. januarja 2003 o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil (UL L 31, 6.2.2003, str. 18).
Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status (OJ L 326, 13.12.2005, p. 13).
Direktiva Sveta 2005/85/ES z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah (UL L 326, 13.12.2005, str. 13).
Repealed Regulations (referred to in Article 48)
Razveljavljene uredbe (iz člena 48)
Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003
(OJ L 50, 25.2.2003, p. 1)
(UL L 50, 25.2.2003, str. 1)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 only Articles 11(1), 13, 14 and 17
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1560/2003, samo členi 11(1), 13, 14 in 17
(OJ L 222, 5.9.2003, p. 3)
(UL L 222, 5.9.2003, str. 3)
Regulation (EC) No 343/2003
Uredba (ES) št. 343/2003
Article 2(j) and (k)
člen 2(j) in (k)
Article 2(l) and (m)
člen 2(l) in (m)
Article 2(n)
člen 2(n)
Article 4(1), introductory wording
člen 4(1), uvodno besedilo
Article 4(1)(a) to (f)
člen 4(1)(a) do (f)
Article 4(1) to (5)
člen 4(1) do (5)
Article 20(1) to (5)
člen 20(1) do (5)
Article 20(5), third subparagraph
člen 20(5), tretji pododstavek
Article 6, first paragraph
člen 6, prvi odstavek
Article 17(2), fourth subparagraph
člen 17(2), četrti pododstavek
Article 15(5)
člen 15(5)
Articles 8(5) and (6) and Article 16(2)
člen 8(5) in (6) ter člen 16(2)
Article 16(1)(a)
člen 16(1)(a)
Article 18(1)(a)
člen 18(1)(a)
Article 16(1)(b)
člen 16(1)(b)
Article 16(1)(c)
člen 16(1)(c)
Article 18(1)(b)
člen 18(1)(b)
Article 16(1)(d)
člen 16(1)(d)
Article 18(1)(c)
člen 18(1)(c)
Article 16(1)(e)
člen 16(1)(e)
Article 18(1)(d)
člen 18(1)(d)
Article 19(2), first subparagraph
člen 19(2), prvi pododstavek
Article 19(2), second subparagraph
člen 19(2), drugi pododstavek
Article 26(2) and Article 27(1)
člen 26(2) in člen 27(1)
Article 27(2) to (6)
člen 27(2) do (6)
Article 20(1), introductory wording
člen 20(1), uvodno besedilo
Article 23(5), first subparagraph
člen 23(5), prvi pododstavek
Article 20(1)(b)
člen 20(1)(b)
Article 20(1)(c)
člen 20(1)(c)
Article 20(1)(d)
člen 20(1)(d)
Article 29(1), first subparagraph
člen 29(1), prvi pododstavek
Article 20(1)(e)
člen 20(1)(e)
Article 26(1), (2), Article 27(1), Article 29(1), second and third subparagraphs
člen 26(1) in (2), člen 27(1), člen 29(1), drugi in tretji pododstavek
Article 23(5), second subparagraph
člen 23(5), drugi pododstavek
Article 21(1) to (9)
člen 21(1) do (9)
Article 34(1) to (9), first to third subparagraphs
člen 34(1) do (9), prvi do tretji pododstavek
Article 34(9), fourth subparagraph
člen 34(9), četrti pododstavek
Article 21(10) to (12)
člen 21(10) do (12)
Article 34(10) to (12)
člen 34(10) do (12)
Article 27(1), (2)
člen 27(1) in (2)
Article 44(1), (2)
člen 44(1) in (2)
Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003
Uredba (ES) št. 1560/2003
Article 17(2), third subparagraph
člen 17(2), tretji pododstavek
Articles 9, 10, 17(2), first subparagraph
člen 9, člen 10, člen 17(2), prvi pododstavek
STATEMENT BY THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COMMISSION
IZJAVA SVETA, EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN KOMISIJE
The Council and the European Parliament invite the Commission to consider, without prejudice to its right of initiative, a revision of Article 8(4) of the Recast of the Dublin Regulation once the Court of Justice rules on case C-648/11 MA and Others vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department and at the latest by the time limits set in Article 46 of the Dublin Regulation.
Brez poseganja v pravico Komisije do pobude Svet in Evropski parlament pozivata Komisijo, naj preuči možnost revizije člena 8(4) prenovljene dublinske uredbe, ko bo Sodišče odločilo v zadevi C-648/11 MA in drugi proti Secretary of State for the Home Department, najpozneje pa v rokih, določenih v členu 46 dublinske uredbe.
The European Parliament and the Council will then both exercise their legislative competences, taking into account the best interests of the child.
Evropski parlament in Svet bosta nato izvršila svoje zakonodajne pristojnosti in pri tem upoštevala največjo korist otroka.
The Commission, in a spirit of compromise and in order to ensure the immediate adoption of the proposal, accepts to consider this invitation, which it understands as being limited to these specific circumstances and not creating a precedent.
Komisija, ki želi omogočiti takojšnje sprejetje predloga, v duhu kompromisa soglaša s tem, da bo preučila ta poziv, ki ga razume kot poziv, ki se nanaša le na te specifične okoliščine in ne pomeni precedensa.
The European Council of 4 November 2004 adopted The Hague Programme which set the objectives to be implemented in the area of freedom, security and justice in the period 2005-2010.
Evropski svet je 4. novembra 2004 sprejel haaški program, v katerem so opredeljeni cilji, ki jih je treba v obdobju 2005–2010 uresničiti na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
In this respect, The Hague Programme invited the European Commission to conclude the evaluation of the first-phase legal instruments and to submit the second-phase instruments and measures to the European Parliament and to the Council with a view to their adoption before 2010.
V tem smislu je bila s haaškim programom Evropska komisija pozvana, da zaključi oceno prve faze pravnih instrumentov ter Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži instrumente in ukrepe za drugo fazo, da bi jih bilo mogoče sprejeti pred letom 2010.
Regulation (EU) No 605/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 605/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1185/2003 on the removal of fins of sharks on board vessels
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1185/2003 o odstranjevanju plavuti morskih psov na krovu plovil
Council Regulation (EC) No 1185/2003 [3] establishes a general prohibition of the practice of ‘shark finning’, whereby a shark’s fins are removed and the remainder of the shark is discarded at sea.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1185/2003 [3] določa splošno prepoved prakse rezanja plavuti morskim psom, pri kateri se morskim psom odstranijo plavuti, ostanek morskega psa pa se odvrže v morje.
Fish belonging to the taxon Elasmobranchii, including sharks, skates and rays, are generally very vulnerable to overexploitation due to the characteristics of their life cycle, which include slow growth, late maturity and a small number of young, although biological productivity is not the same for all species.
Ribe iz taksona Elasmobranchii, ki vključuje morske pse, skate in raže, so zaradi prevelikega izkoriščanja na splošno zelo ranljive, saj so za njihov življenjski cikel značilni počasna rast, pozna zrelost in majhno število mladic, čeprav biološka produktivnost ni enaka za vse vrste.
Generally, in recent years, some shark populations have been severely targeted, including by vessels flying the flag of a Member State that are operating in Union and non-Union waters, and put under serious threat as a result of a dramatic increase in demand for shark products, and for shark fins in particular.
V zadnjih letih se je na splošno zaradi bistvenega povečanja povpraševanja po proizvodih iz morskih psov, zlasti po plavutih morskega psa, zelo povečal lov na nekatere populacije morskih psov, vključno s strani plovil pod zastavo države članice, ki delujejo v vodah Unije in vodah držav nečlanic, zaradi česar so te populacije postale resno ogrožene.
Shark fins do not constitute a traditional ingredient of the European diet, but sharks do constitute a necessary element of the Union’s marine ecosystem.
Plavuti morskih psov niso tradicionalna sestavina v evropski prehrani, so pa morski psi nujen člen morskega ekosistema v Uniji.
The management and conservation of shark stocks, as well as, more generally, the promotion of a fishing sector that is sustainably managed for the benefit of the environment and of the people working in the sector, should therefore be a priority.
Upravljanje in ohranjanje staležev morskih psov ter, bolj na splošno, spodbujanje ribiškega sektorja, ki je trajnostno upravljan, v korist okolja in ljudi, ki v sektorju delajo, bi bilo zato treba določiti kot prednostno nalogo.
Current scientific knowledge, based on the examination of shark catch rates, generally indicates that many shark stocks are under serious threat, although the situation is not the same for all species or even for the same species in different maritime zones.
Trenutna znanstvena spoznanja, ki temeljijo na preučevanju količin ulova morskih psov, na splošno kažejo, da je več staležev morskih psov resno ogroženih, čeprav stanje ni enako za vse vrste ali celo iste vrste morskih psov v različnih morskih območjih.
According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), more than 25 % of all pelagic shark species, of which over 50 % are large oceanic-pelagic sharks, are threatened.
Po podatkih Mednarodne zveze za ohranjanje narave in naravnih virov (IUCN) je ogroženih več kot 25 % vseh pelagičnih vrst morskih psov, med temi je več kot 50 % velikih oceansko-pelagičnih morskih psov.
In recent years, the capture, retention on board, transhipment, or landing of a growing number of shark species, including that of sharks whose fins are highly valuable in trade, has been prohibited under Union law or within the framework of regional fisheries management organisations.
V zadnjih letih so po zakonodaji Unije ali v okviru regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva prepovedani ulov, hranjenje na krovu, pretovarjanje ali iztovarjanje vse večjega števila vrst morskih psov, vključno s tistimi, ki imajo pri trgovanju visoko cenjene plavuti.
Blue shark (Priconace glauca) and shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), classified by the IUCN as ‘near-threatened’ and ‘vulnerable’ respectively, are currently the predominant species of shark captured by the Union fleet, with blue shark accounting for approximately 70 % of total reported shark landings.
Sinji morski pes (Priconace glauca), ki ga IUCN uvršča med „skoraj ogrožene“, in atlantski mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), ki ga IUCN uvršča med „ranljive“, sta trenutno prevladujoči vrsti morskih psov v ulovu flote Unije, pri čemer predstavlja sinji morski pes približno 70 % celotnega prijavljenega iztovora morskih psov.
Other species, however, including hammerhead and silky sharks, are also subject to capture in Union and non-Union waters and contribute to the economic viability of fisheries.
Vseeno se v vodah Unije in vodah držav nečlanic lovijo tudi druge vrste, vključno s kladvenicami in svilnatimi morskimi psi, in prispevajo k ekonomski vzdržnosti ribištva.
Regulation (EC) No 1185/2003 currently allows Member States to issue special fishing permits allowing sharks to be processed on board by removing their fins from their bodies.
Uredba (ES) št. 1185/2003 trenutno omogoča državam članicam, da izdajo posebna dovoljenja za ribolov, ki dovoljujejo predelavo morskih psov na krovu, pri kateri se lahko plavuti morskega psa odstranijo z njihovih teles.
In order to ensure that there is a correlation between the weight of a shark’s fins and its body, a ‘fin-to-carcass’ ratio has been established.
Za zagotovitev povezave med maso plavuti morskega psa in njegovega telesa, se določi razmerje med maso plavuti in maso trupa.
There are serious control and enforcement difficulties with the use of the ‘fin-to-carcass’ ratio.
Z uporabo razmerja med maso plavuti in maso trupa obstajajo resne težave pri nadzoru in izvajanju.
The use of such a ratio is insufficient to eliminate the practice of high-grading and, due to differences in fin-cutting techniques and the variability of the fin size and weight of different shark species, its use could lead to finning going undetected.
Uporaba takega razmerja ni dovolj, da se odpravi praksa višanja vrednosti ulova, zaradi razlik v tehnikah rezanja plavuti ter spremenljivosti velikosti plavuti in teže pri različnih vrstah morskih psov pa bi lahko rezanje plavuti potekalo neopaženo.
Following processing operations, fins and bodies can be landed in different ports.
Plavuti in telesa se lahko po predelavi na krovu iztovorijo v različnih pristaniščih.
In these circumstances, the collection of data, inter alia, on species identification and populations structure, underpinning scientific advice for the establishment of fisheries conservation and management measures, is hampered.
V teh okoliščinah je zbiranje podatkov, med drugim o vrstah in strukturi populacije, ki podpirajo znanstveno mnenje glede uvedbe ukrepov za ohranjanje in upravljanje ribištva, omejeno.
In light of the International Action Plan for the Conservation and Management of Sharks adopted in 1999 by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), the Union should adopt all measures necessary for the conservation of sharks and to minimise waste and discards from shark catches.
V luči mednarodnega akcijskega načrta za ohranjanje in upravljanje morskih psov, ki ga je Organizacija Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO) sprejela leta 1999, bi morala Unija sprejeti vse ukrepe, potrebne za ohranjanje morskih psov in za zmanjšanje odpadkov in zavržkov iz ulova morskih psov.
The Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) acknowledges the problem of shark finning, calls for its eradication, without derogations, and advises that all elasmobranch species should be landed with their fins/wings naturally attached to their bodies.
Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo (STECF) priznava, da obstajajo težave v zvezi z rezanjem plavuti morskim psom, poziva k njeni odpravi brez odstopanja ter svetuje, da bi bilo treba vse ribje vrste taksona Elasmobranchii iztovoriti v obliki, v kateri se plavuti naravno držijo trupa.
Regional fisheries management organisations are increasingly addressing the issue of shark finning.
Regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva obravnavajo vprašanje rezanja plavuti morskim psom čedalje resneje.
In addition, their scientific bodies are showing a preference for sharks to be landed with their fins naturally attached to their bodies and are noting that this is the best way to prevent finning and to facilitate the collection of data needed for stock assessments.
Poleg tega njihovi znanstveni organi podpirajo iztovarjanje morskih psov, pri katerih se plavuti držijo trupa, in ugotavljajo, da je to najboljši način za preprečevanje rezanja plavuti morskim psom, ki bo tudi olajšal zbiranje podatkov za oceno staležev.
The annual resolutions on sustainable fisheries issued by the United Nations General Assembly since 2007, the 2008 IUCN Global Policy against shark finning and the 2010 Meeting of the Fish Stocks Agreement Review Conference have all called on nations to take measures requiring that all sharks are landed with their fins naturally attached to their bodies.
Letne resolucije o trajnostnem ribištvu, ki jih od leta 2007 sprejema generalna skupščina Združenih narodov, globalna politika IUCN proti rezanju plavuti morskim psom iz leta 2008 ter revizijska konferenca o sporazumu o ribjih staležih iz leta 2010 so pozvale države, naj sprejmejo ukrepe za obvezno iztovarjanje vseh morskih psov v obliki, v kateri se plavuti naravno držijo trupa.
In 2010 and 2011, as part of the required impact assessment exercise, the Commission held a public consultation in order to gather information on the most appropriate manner in which to amend Regulation (EC) No 1185/2003.
Komisija je v letih 2010 in 2011 v okviru zahtevane priprave ocene vplivov izvedla javno posvetovanje, da bi pridobila informacije o najprimernejšem načinu za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1185/2003.
The Commission concluded in its impact assessment that, in order to achieve the basic objective of conserving shark stocks, that Regulation should provide that all sharks be landed with their fins naturally attached to their bodies.
Komisija je v svoji oceni vplivov ugotovila, da bi z namenom doseganja osnovnega cilja ohranjanja staležev morskih psov navedena uredba morala določiti, da se vsi morski psi iztovarjajo v obliki, v kateri se plavuti naravno držijo trupa.
Regulation (EC) No 1185/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 1185/2003 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 1185/2003 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1185/2003 se spremeni:
in Article 2, point 3 is deleted;
1. v členu 2 se črta točka 3;
in Article 3, the following paragraph is inserted:
2. v členu 3 se vstavi naslednji odstavek:
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, in order to facilitate on-board storage, shark fins may be partially sliced through and folded against the carcass, but shall not be removed from the carcass before landing.’;
Brez poseganja v odstavek 1 se za lažje skladiščenje na krovu lahko plavuti morskih psov delno odrežejo in stisnejo ob trup, vendar se jih ne odstrani s trupa pred iztovorom.“;
Articles 4 and 5 are deleted;
3. člena 4 in 5 se črtata;
Article 6 is replaced by the following:
4. člen 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where vessels flying the flag of a Member State catch, retain on-board, tranship or land sharks, the flag Member State, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, shall send to the Commission, annually, by 1 May, a comprehensive report on its implementation of this Regulation during the previous year.
Kadar ribiška plovila, ki plujejo pod zastavo države članice, lovijo, obdržijo na krovu, pretovarjajo ali iztovarjajo morske pse, država članica zastave v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 z dne 20. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike in Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 404/2011 z dne 8. aprila 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 pošlje Komisiji vsako leto do 1. maja izčrpno poročilo o njenem izvajanju te uredbe v preteklem letu.
The report shall describe the monitoring by the flag Member State of compliance with this Regulation by its vessels in Union and non-Union waters, and the enforcement measures it has taken in cases of non-compliance.
Poročilo vključuje opis s strani države članice zastave spremljanja skladnosti njenih plovil v vodah Unije in v vodah držav nečlanic s to uredbo in izvršilne ukrepe, ki jih je sprejela v primerih neskladnosti.
In particular, the flag Member State shall provide all of the following information: the number of landings of sharks,
Država članica zastave navede zlasti vse naslednje informacije: število iztovarjanj morskih psov,
the number, date and place of the inspections that have been carried out,
število, datum in kraj izvedenih inšpekcijskih pregledov,
the number and nature of cases of non-compliance detected, including a full identification of the vessel(s) involved and the penalty applied for each case of non-compliance, and
število in naravo primerov ugotovljenih neskladnosti, vključno s popolno identifikacijo zadevnih plovil, ter uporabljeno kazen za vsak primer neskladnosti, in
the total landings by species (weight/number) and by port.
skupni iztovor po vrsti (teža/število) in po pristanišču.
After the submission by Member States of their second annual report in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission shall, by 1 January 2016, report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the operation of this Regulation and the international developments in this field.
Po predložitvi drugega letnega poročila držav članic v skladu z odstavkom 1 Komisija do 1. januarja 2016 poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju te uredbe in napredku na tem področju v mednarodnem okviru.
Done at Strasbourg, 12 June 2013.
V Strasbourgu, dne 12. junija 2013
OJ C 181, 21.6.2012, p. 195.
UL C 181, 21.6.2012, str. 195.
Position of the European Parliament of 22 November 2012 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 6 June 2013.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. novembra 2012 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 6. junija 2013.
OJ L 167, 4.7.2003, p. 1.
UL L 167, 4.7.2003, str. 1.
OJ L 112, 30.4.2011, p. 1.’.
UL L 112, 30.4.2011, str. 1.“
In its conclusions of 23 April 2009, the Council endorsed the Union’s overall approach and specific objectives, as set out in the related Commission Communication on a European Community Action Plan for the Conservation and Management of Sharks of 5 February 2009.
Svet je v svojih sklepih z dne 23. aprila 2009 podprl splošni pristop in posebne cilje Unije, kakor so določeni v Sporočilu Komisije o akcijskem načrtu Evropske skupnosti za ohranjanje in upravljanje morskih psov z dne 5. februarja 2009.
The Council also encouraged the Commission to pay particular attention to the issue of the removal of shark fins and to present, as soon as possible, a proposal for the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1185/2003, in particular with reference to the derogations and the associated conditions laid down therein.
Svet je tudi spodbudil Komisijo, naj posebno pozornost nameni vprašanju odstranjevanja plavuti morskega psa in naj čim prej predloži predlog za spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1185/2003, zlasti glede odstopanj in povezanih pogojev, določenih v navedeni uredbi.
Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 606/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters
o vzajemnem priznavanju zaščitnih ukrepov v civilnih zadevah
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a), (e) and (f) of Article 81(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti točk (a), (e) in (f) člena 81(2) Pogodbe,
The Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice in which the free movement of persons is ensured and access to justice is facilitated, in particular through the principle of mutual recognition of judicial and extrajudicial decisions in civil matters.
Unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, v katerem je zagotovljeno prosto gibanje oseb in olajšan dostop do pravnega varstva, zlasti z načelom vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih in izvensodnih odločb v civilnih zadevah.
For the gradual establishment of such an area, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications, particularly when necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takega območja mora Unija sprejeti ukrepe v zvezi s pravosodnim sodelovanjem v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami, zlasti če so ti potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
Article 81(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications is to be based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and of decisions in extrajudicial cases.
V členu 81(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je določeno, da pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb in odločb v izvensodnih zadevah.
Mutual trust in the administration of justice in the Union and the aim of ensuring quicker and less costly circulation of protection measures within the Union justify the principle according to which protection measures ordered in one Member State are recognised in all other Member States without any special procedure being required.
Medsebojno zaupanje pri delovanju pravosodja v Uniji in cilj, da se zagotovi hitrejši in cenovno ugodnejši pretok zaščitnih ukrepov znotraj Unije, upravičujeta načelo, v skladu s katerim se zaščitni ukrepi, ki se odredijo v državi članici, priznajo v vseh drugih državah članicah, ne da bi bili pri tem potrebni kakršni koli posebni postopki.