natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Instead, the free allocation is provided to the installation where the steel refining takes place.
Namesto tega je brezplačna dodelitev zagotovljena napravi, v kateri se jeklo predeluje.
The Commission notes that for the purposes of allocating emission allowances, product benchmarks have been laid down in Decision 2011/278/EU taking into account the product definitions and the complexity of the production processes that allow for verification of production data and a uniform application of the product benchmarks across the Union.
Komisija poudarja, da so bile za dodeljevanje pravic do emisije v Sklepu 2011/278/EU določene referenčne vrednosti za proizvode ob upoštevanju opisov proizvodov in zahtevnosti proizvodnih procesov, ki omogočajo preverjanje proizvodnih podatkov in enotno uporabo referenčnih vrednosti za proizvode po vsej Uniji.
For the application of the product benchmarks, installations are divided into sub-installations, a product benchmark sub-installation being defined as inputs, outputs and corresponding emissions relating to the production of a product for which a benchmark has been set in Annex I to Decision 2011/278/EU.
Za uporabo referenčnih vrednosti za proizvode so naprave razdeljene na podnaprave, pri čemer podnaprava z referenčno vrednostjo za proizvode pomeni vhodne materiale, obseg proizvodnje in ustrezne emisije v zvezi s proizvodnjo proizvoda, za katerega je bila v Prilogi I k Sklepu 2011/278/EU določena referenčna vrednost.
Benchmarks are thus established for products and not for processes.
Referenčne vrednosti so torej določene za proizvode in ne za procese.
Accordingly, a benchmark has been developed for hot metal, with the product defined as liquid iron saturated with carbon for further processing.
V skladu s tem je bila določena referenčna vrednost za vročo litino, ki je opisana kot tekoče železo, nasičeno z ogljikom za nadaljnjo predelavo.
The fact that the system boundaries for the hot metal benchmark set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/278/EU comprise the BOF cannot permit Member States to disregard that allocations should take place for the production of a given product.
Kljub dejstvu, da meje sistema za referenčno vrednost za vročo litino iz Priloge I k Sklepu 2011/278/EU vključujejo martinovko, si države članice ne smejo dovoliti, da ne bi upoštevale, da je treba pravice dodeliti za proizvodnjo zadevnega proizvoda.
This consideration is corroborated by the fact that the benchmark values should cover all production-related direct emissions.
To potrjuje tudi dejstvo, da morajo referenčne vrednosti zajeti vse neposredne emisije, povezane s proizvodnjo.
However, it is the production of hot metal in the blast furnace that mainly causes emissions while the process of refining the hot metal to steel in the BOF converter is relatively low in emissions.
Vendar emisije povzroča zlasti proizvodnja vroče litine v plavžu, medtem ko proces predelave vroče litine v jeklo v kisikovem konverterju povzroča relativno malo emisij.
Accordingly, the benchmark value would be much lower, if it also covered installations importing hot metal and refining it in the BOF converter to steel.
V skladu s tem bi bila referenčna vrednost precej nižja, če bi zajemala tudi naprave, ki vročo litino sprejemajo in jo v kisikovem konverterju predelujejo v jeklo.
Moreover, in the light of the overall scheme for allocation set up by Decision 2011/278/EU, in particular with regard to the rules on significant capacity changes, the allocation proposed by Germany cannot be regarded as consistent.
Poleg tega se glede na splošno shemo dodeljevanja iz Sklepa 2011/278/EU, zlasti pravila o znatnih spremembah zmogljivosti, dodelitev, ki jo predlaga Nemčija, ne more šteti za skladno.
The Commission therefore finds that due to the lack of a corresponding sub-installation that would allow for the determination of the allocation in accordance with Article 10 of Decision 2011/278/EU, installations importing hot metal for further processing cannot be regarded eligible for receiving free allocation on the basis of the hot metal benchmark for the amount of hot metal imported.
Komisija zato meni, da se zaradi neobstoja ustrezne podnaprave, ki bi omogočala določitev dodelitve pravic v skladu s členom 10 Sklepa 2011/278/EU, naprave, ki sprejemajo vročo litino za nadaljnjo predelavo, ne morejo šteti za upravičene do brezplačne dodelitve pravic na podlagi referenčne vrednosti za vročo litino za količino sprejete vroče litine.
The Commission therefore objects to the preliminary total annual amounts of free allocation proposed for the installations listed in point B of Annex I to this Decision.
Komisija zato nasprotuje predhodnim letnim količinam brezplačno dodeljenih pravic, ki so bile predlagane za naprave iz točke B Priloge I k temu sklepu.
With regard to the application of the benchmark for hot metal in the NIMs as proposed by the Czech Republic, the Commission notes that the allocation to the installation listed under point C with the identifier CZ-existing-CZ-73-CZ-0134-11/M does not correspond to the value of the hot metal benchmark multiplied by the relevant product-related historical activity level as submitted in the NIMs and is therefore not in line with Article 10(2)(a) of Decision 2011/278/EU.
V zvezi z uporabo referenčne vrednosti za vročo litino v nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepih, ki jih je predlagala Češka republika, Komisija ugotavlja, da dodelitev pravic napravi z oznako CZ-existing-CZ-73-CZ-0134-11/M, navedeni v točki C, ne ustreza višini referenčne vrednosti za vročo litino, pomnoženi z ustrezno preteklo ravnjo dejavnosti glede proizvoda, kakor je bila predložena v nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepih, in zato ni v skladu s členom 10(2)(a) Sklepa 2011/278/EU.
The Commission therefore objects to the allocation to this installation unless this error is corrected.
Komisija zato nasprotuje dodelitvi pravic tej napravi, razen če se ta napaka popravi.
Furthermore, the Commission notes that the allocation to the installation listed under point C with the identifier CZ-existing-CZ-52-CZ-0102-05 takes account of processes that are covered by the system boundaries of the hot metal benchmark.
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da so pri dodelitvi pravic napravi z oznako CZ-existing-CZ-52-CZ-0102-05, navedeni v točki C, upoštevani procesi, zajeti v mejah sistema za referenčno vrednost za vročo litino.
The installation, however, does not produce, but imports hot metal.
Vendar naprava vroče litine ne proizvaja, temveč jo sprejema.
Due to the lack of production of hot metal in the installation with the identifier CZ-existing-CZ-52-CZ-0102-05, and thus a lack of a corresponding product benchmark sub-installation that would allow for the determination of the allocation in accordance with Article 10 of Decision 2011/278/EU, the proposed allocation is not consistent with the allocation rules and may give rise to double counting.
Ker se v napravi z oznako CZ-existing-CZ-52-CZ-0102-05 ne proizvaja vroča litina in tako ne obstaja ustrezna podnaprava z referenčno vrednostjo za proizvode, ki bi omogočala določitev dodelitve v skladu s členom 10 Sklepa 2011/278/EU, predlagana dodelitev ni v skladu s pravili dodeljevanja in lahko povzroči dvojno štetje.
The Commission therefore objects to the allocation to the installations listed in point C of Annex I to this Decision.
Komisija zato nasprotuje dodelitvi pravic napravam, navedenim v točki C Priloge I k temu sklepu.
The Commission notes that the installations referred to in point D of Annex I to this Decision receive an allocation on the basis of a process emissions sub-installation for the production of zinc in the blast furnace and related processes.
Komisija ugotavlja, da napravi iz točke D Priloge I k temu sklepu prejmeta pravice na podlagi podnaprave z emisijami iz proizvodnih procesov za proizvodnjo cinka v plavžu in povezanih procesov.
In this regard, the Commission notes that the emissions covered by the process emissions sub-installation are already covered by the product benchmark sub-installation for hot metal on the basis of which one of the installations also receives an allocation and are thus double counted.
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da so emisije, ki jih zajema podnaprava z emisijami iz proizvodnih procesov, zajete že v podnapravi z referenčno vrednostjo za vročo litino, na podlagi katere ena od naprav prav tako prejme pravice, in so zato štete dvojno.
The product benchmark sub-installation for hot metal clearly covers inputs, outputs and corresponding emissions relating to the production of hot metal in the blast furnace and all related processes as set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/278/EU, including slag treatment.
Podnaprava z referenčno vrednostjo za vročo litino jasno zajema vhodne materiale, obseg proizvodnje in ustrezne emisije v zvezi s proizvodnjo vroče litine v plavžu in vse povezane procese, kot je navedeno v Prilogi I k Sklepu 2011/278/EU, vključno z obdelavo žlindre.
The NIMs proposed by Germany therefore contravene Article 10(8) of Decision 2011/278/EU and the obligation to avoid double-counting of emissions because certain emissions are accounted for twice in the allocation to these installations.
Nacionalni izvedbeni ukrepi, ki jih je predlagala Nemčija, so zato v nasprotju s členom 10(8) Sklepa 2011/278/EU in obvezo, da je treba zagotoviti, da ne prihaja do dvojnega štetja emisij, saj so pri dodelitvi pravic tem napravam nekatere emisije štete dvakrat.
The Commission therefore objects to the allocation to these installations on the basis of a process emissions sub-installation for the production of zinc in the blast furnace and related processes.
Komisija zato nasprotuje dodelitvi pravic tema dvema napravama na podlagi podnaprave z emisijami iz proizvodnih procesov za proizvodnjo cinka v plavžu in povezanih procesov.
The Commission also notes that the list of installations set out in the German NIMs is incomplete and therefore contravenes Article 11(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da je seznam naprav v nemških nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepih nepopoln in zato v nasprotju s členom 11(1) Direktive 2003/87/ES.
The Commission considers that polymers, including S-PVC and E-PVC, and VCM, satisfy the definition of the relevant activity (production of bulk organic chemicals) in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC.
Komisija meni, da polimeri, vključno s S-PVC in E-PVC ter VCM, ustrezajo opredelitvi zadevne dejavnosti (proizvodnja voluminoznih organskih kemikalij) iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2003/87/ES.
Accordingly, in close cooperation with Member States and the industry sectors concerned corresponding product benchmarks for S-PVC, E-PVC and VCM were derived as set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/278/EU.
V skladu s tem so bile v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami in zadevnimi industrijskimi sektorji izpeljane ustrezne referenčne vrednosti za S-PVC, E-PVC in VCM, kot so navedene v Prilogi I k Sklepu 2011/278/EU.
The Commission notes that the fact that the German list of installations is incomplete has undue effects on the allocation on the basis of the heat benchmark subinstallation for installations listed in point E of Annex I to this Decision exporting heat to installations producing bulk organic chemicals.
Komisija ugotavlja, da ima nemški seznam naprav zato, ker je nepopoln, neupravičene posledice na dodelitev na podlagi podnaprave z referenčno vrednostjo za toploto za naprave iz točke E Priloge I k temu sklepu, ki odvajajo toploto napravam, ki proizvajajo voluminozne organske kemikalije.
Whereas only heat exports to an installation or other entity not covered by Directive 2003/87/EC give rise to free allocation on the basis of the heat benchmark subinstallation, in the German NIMs, heat exports to installations carrying out activities within the scope of Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC are taken into account for the allocation to installations listed in point E of Annex I to this Decision.
Brezplačna dodelitev na podlagi podnaprave z referenčno vrednostjo za toploto je možna samo v primeru toplote, odvedene napravi ali drugemu subjektu, ki ni zajet v Direktivi 2003/87/ES, v nemških nacionalnih izvedbenih ukrepih pa je pri dodelitvi pravic napravam, navedenim v točki E Priloge I k temu sklepu, upoštevana toplota, odvedena napravam, ki izvajajo dejavnosti s področja uporabe Priloge I k Direktivi 2003/87/ES.
Consequently, the proposed allocations to the installations listed in point E of Annex I are not consistent with the allocation rules.
Zato predlagane dodelitve napravam iz točke E Priloge I niso v skladu s pravili dodeljevanja.
The Commission therefore objects to the allocation to the installations listed in point E of Annex I to this Decision.
Komisija zato nasprotuje dodelitvi napravam iz točke E Priloge I k temu sklepu.
Furthermore, with regard to the adjustment of the Union-wide quantity of allowances pursuant to Article 9a of Directive 2003/87/EC, and in particular paragraphs 1 and 4 thereof, account should be taken of the latest scientific data with regard to the global warming potential of greenhouse gases, Commission Decisions C(2011) 3798 and C(2012) 497 to accept the unilateral inclusion of additional greenhouse gases and activities by Italy and the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 24 of Directive 2003/87/EC as well as the exclusion of installations with low emissions from the EU ETS by Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia and the United Kingdom, pursuant to Article 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba v zvezi s prilagoditvijo skupne količine pravic za celotno Unijo na podlagi člena 9a Direktive 2003/87/ES, zlasti odstavkov 1 in 4 navedenega člena, upoštevati najnovejše znanstvene podatke glede potenciala toplogrednih plinov za globalno segrevanje, sklepa Komisije C(2011) 3798 in C(2012) 497 o odobritvi enostranske vključitve dodatnih toplogrednih plinov in dejavnosti s strani Italije in Združenega kraljestva na podlagi člena 24 Direktive 2003/87/ES ter izključitev naprav z nizkimi emisijami iz sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami s strani Nemčije, Združenega kraljestva, Francije, Nizozemske, Španije, Slovenije in Italije na podlagi člena 27 Direktive 2003/87/ES.
In addition, the absolute Union-wide quantity of allowances should take account of the accession of Croatia to the European Union as well as the extension of the EU ETS to the EEA-EFTA States.
Poleg tega bi morala absolutna količina pravic za celotno Unijo upoštevati pristop Hrvaške k Evropski uniji ter razširitev sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami na države EGP-EFTA.
Pursuant to point 8 of Annex III to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, the quantity taken into account pursuant to Article 9 of Directive 2003/87/EC is increased as a result of Croatia's accession by the quantity of allowances that Croatia shall auction pursuant to Article 10(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC.
V skladu s točko 8 Priloge III k Aktu o pogojih pristopa Republike Hrvaške in prilagoditvah Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo se količina, ki se upošteva v skladu s členom 9 Direktive 2003/87/ES, zaradi pristopa Hrvaške poveča za količino pravic, ki jih bo Hrvaška prodala na dražbi v skladu s členom 10(1) Direktive 2003/87/ES.
The incorporation into the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement of Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] and Decision 2011/278/EU as amended by Commission Decision 2011/745/EU [7] by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 152/2012 [8] implies an increase of the total quantity of allowances in the EU ETS as a whole under Articles 9 and 9a of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Vključitev Direktive 2009/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] in Sklepa 2011/278/EU, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Komisije 2011/745/EU [7], v Sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru s Sklepom Skupnega odbora EGP št. 152/2012 [8] pomeni povečanje skupne količine pravic v sistemu EU za trgovanje z emisijami kot celote na podlagi členov 9 in 9a Direktive 2003/87/ES.
It is therefore necessary to take account of the relevant figures provided by the EEA-EFTA States in Part A of the Appendix to that Directive in the EEA Agreement.
Zato je treba upoštevati zadevne številke, ki so jih zagotovile države EGP-EFTA, iz dela A Dodatka k navedeni direktivi iz Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru.
Decision 2010/634/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Sklep 2010/634/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In 2014 and each subsequent year, the total quantity of allowances determined for 2013 on the basis of Articles 9 and 9a of Directive 2003/87/EC decreases by a linear factor of 1,74 % from 2010, amounting to 38264246 allowances.
Skupna količina pravic, določenih za leto 2013, se na podlagi členov 9 in 9a Direktive 2003/87/ES leta 2014 in vsako naslednje leto zmanjša z linearnim faktorjem 1,74 % iz leta 2010, kar znaša 38264246 pravic.
Article 10a(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC limits the maximum annual quantity of allowances that is the basis for calculating allocations free of charge to installations not covered by Article 10a(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Člen 10a(5) Direktive 2003/87/ES določa največjo letno količino pravic, ki je podlaga za izračun brezplačno dodeljenih pravic napravam, ki niso zajete v členu 10a(3) Direktive 2003/87/ES.
This limit is composed of two elements referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 10a(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC, each of which has been determined by the Commission on the basis of the quantities determined pursuant to Articles 9 and 9a of Directive 2003/87/EC, data publicly available in the Union registry and information provided by Member States, in particular with regard to the share of emissions from electricity generators and other installations not eligible for free allocation referred to in Article 10a(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC as well as verified emissions in the period from 2005 to 2007 from installations only included in the EU ETS from 2013 onwards, where available, taking into account the latest scientific data with regard to the global warming potential of greenhouse gases.
To največjo letno količino sestavljata elementa iz točk (a) in (b) člena 10a(5) Direktive 2003/87/ES, ki ju je Komisija določila na podlagi količin, določenih v skladu s členoma 9 in 9a Direktive 2003/87/ES, javno dostopnih podatkov v registru Unije in informacij, ki so jih predložile države članice, zlasti glede deleža emisij iz proizvajalcev električne energije in drugih naprav, ki niso upravičene do dodelitve brezplačnih pravic, iz člena 10a(3) Direktive 2003/87/ES, kot tudi deleža preverjenih emisij v obdobju 2005–2007 iz naprav, ki so v sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami vključene šele od leta 2013, če so ti podatki na voljo, ob upoštevanju najnovejših znanstvenih podatkov glede potenciala toplogrednih plinov za globalno segrevanje.
The limit set by Article 10a(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC may not be exceeded, and this is ensured by the application of an annual cross-sectoral correction factor which, if necessary, reduces the number of free allowances in all installations eligible for free allocation in a uniform manner.
Največja letna količina, ki jo določa člen 10a(5) Direktive 2003/87/ES, se ne sme preseči, kar se zagotovi z uporabo letnega medsektorskega korekcijskega faktorja, ki po potrebi na enoten način zmanjša količino brezplačnih pravic v vseh napravah, upravičenih do brezplačne dodelitve.
Member States have to take this factor into account when deciding on the basis of preliminary allocations and this Decision on the final annual amounts of allocation to installations.
Ta faktor morajo države članice upoštevati, ko na podlagi predhodnih dodelitev in tega sklepa odločajo o končnih letnih količinah dodeljenih pravic napravam.
Article 15(3) of Decision 2011/278/EU requires the Commission to determine the cross-sectoral correction factor, which is done through comparing the sum of the preliminary total annual amounts of free allocation submitted by Member States to the limit set by Article 10a(5) in the manner set out in Article 15(3) of Decision 2011/278/EU.
Člen 15(3) Sklepa 2011/278/EU določa, da mora Komisija določiti medsektorski korekcijski faktor, in sicer s primerjavo vsote predhodnih skupnih letnih količin brezplačno dodeljenih pravic, ki so jih predložile države članice, z največjo letno količino pravic, ki jo določa člen 10a(5), v skladu s členom 15(3) Sklepa 2011/278/EU.
Following the incorporation into the EEA Agreement of Directive 2009/29/EC by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 152/2012, the limit set by Article 10a(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC, the harmonised allocation rules and the cross-sectoral correction factor are to be applied within the EEA-EFTA countries.
Zaradi vključitve Direktive 2009/29/ES v Sporazum o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru s Sklepom Skupnega odbora EGP št. 152/2012 se morajo v državah EGP-EFTA uporabljati največja letna količina iz člena 10a(5) Direktive 2003/87/ES, usklajena pravila dodeljevanja in medsektorski korekcijski faktor.
It is therefore necessary to take into account the preliminary annual amounts of emission allowances allocated free of charge over the period 2013 to 2020 fixed by the decisions of the EFTA Surveillance Authority of 10 July 2013 concerning the NIMs of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.
Zato je treba upoštevati predhodne letne količine brezplačno dodeljenih pravic do emisije v obdobju 2013–2020, določene s sklepi Nadzornega organa Efte z dne 10. julija 2013 v zvezi z nacionalnimi izvedbenimi ukrepi Islandije, Norveške in Lihtenštajna.
To the result of this calculation, the Commission then added 121733050 allowances, based on the average annual verified emissions in the period from 2005 to 2007 of relevant installations taking into account the revised scope of the EU ETS as of 2013.
K rezultatu tega izračuna je Komisija nato prištela 121733050 pravic na podlagi povprečnih letnih preverjenih emisij iz zadevnih naprav v obdobju 2005–2007, ob upoštevanju spremenjenega področja uporabe sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami po letu 2013.
In this respect, the Commission used information provided by Member States and the EEA-EFTA countries for the adjustment of the cap.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija uporabila informacije držav članic in držav EGP-EFTA za prilagoditev omejitve.
Where annual verified emissions for the period 2005-2007 were not available, the Commission extrapolated, to the extent possible, the relevant emission figures from verified emissions in later years by applying the factor of 1,74 % in reverse direction.
Kjer letne preverjene emisije v obdobju 2005–2007 niso bile na voljo, je Komisija zadevne podatke o emisijah kolikor je bilo mogoče ekstrapolirala iz preverjenih emisij v poznejših letih z uporabo faktorja 1,74 % v obratni smeri.
The Commission consulted and obtained confirmation from Member States’ authorities on information and data used in this respect.
Komisija se je glede informacij in podatkov, ki jih je pri tem uporabila, posvetovala z organi držav članic, ki so navedene informacije in podatke potrdili.
The limit set by Article 10a(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC compared to the sum of the preliminary annual amounts of free allocation without application of the factors referred to in Annex VI to Decision 2011/278/EU gives the annual cross-sectoral correction factor as set out in Annex II to this Decision.
Letni medsektorski korekcijski faktor iz Priloge II k temu sklepu se določi s primerjavo največje letne količine iz člena 10a(5) Direktive 2003/87/ES z vsoto predhodnih letnih količin brezplačno dodeljenih pravic brez uporabe faktorjev iz Priloge VI k Sklepu 2011/278/EU.