natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They also claimed that one company with important idle capacity in 2011, located in a Member State that did not implement the Renewable Energies Directive (‘RED’) [4], should not have been included in the sample.
Prav tako so trdile, da ena družba, ki leta 2011 ni izkoristila velikega dela svojih zmogljivosti in ima sedež v državi članici, v kateri se direktiva o energiji iz obnovljivih virov [4] ni izvajala, ne bi smela biti vključena v vzorec.
It was also claimed that in case these companies would be finally included in the sample, the Commission should adjust their data in order to account for these extraordinary circumstances.
Poleg tega so bile podane trditve, da bi v primeru končne vključitve teh družb v vzorec Komisija morala prilagoditi njihove podatke, da bi se upoštevale te izredne okoliščine.
The inclusion of these companies is not in contravention with the criteria for the selection of a sample as laid down in Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Vključitev teh družb ni v nasprotju z merili za izbiro vzorca iz člena 17 osnovne uredbe.
With regard to the adjustment of their data, parties did not provide any specific issue or substantiated evidence to support their claim, nor a basis on how to make the claimed adjustment.
Kar zadeva prilagoditev njihovih podatkov, strani niso navedle nobenih posebnih težav ali predložile utemeljenih dokazil v podporo svojih trditev, poleg tega pa niso navedle osnovnih podatkov o načinu izvedbe zahtevane prilagoditve.
Furthermore, the investigation did not reveal any cost, such as for example accelerated depreciations, which should be adjusted to correct any distortion due to the start-up of activity.
Poleg tega na podlagi preiskave niso bili ugotovljeni nobeni stroški, na primer pospešene amortizacije, ki bi jih bilo treba prilagoditi, da bi se odpravila katera koli izkrivljanja zaradi zagona dejavnosti.
Some parties also disputed the fact that one company that was provisionally selected in the EU sample and located in a Member State with high consumption and production of bioethanol was no longer part of the EU sample.
Nekatere strani so nasprotovale izključitvi ene družbe, ki je bila začasno izbrana v vzorec EU in je imela sedež v državi članici z visoko porabo in proizvodnjo bioetanola, iz vzorca EU.
They claimed that this economic situation of this company was good and suggested that this was the reason for its exclusion from the sample.
Trdile so, da je bil gospodarski položaj te družbe dober in da je bil to razlog za njeno izključitev iz vzorca.
According to these parties the Commission should have sent so-called mini-questionnaires to all producers to collect the relevant data in order to select a sample.
Po mnenju teh strani bi morala Komisija vsem proizvajalcem poslati kratke vprašalnike, na podlagi katerih bi zbrala ustrezne podatke za izbiro vzorca.
With regard to the sending of mini-questionnaires, it should be noted that, prior to the selection of the sample, the Commission requested information from all Union producers known to be concerned in order to collect the relevant data for the purpose of the selection of a sample.
V zvezi s pošiljanjem kratkih vprašalnikov bi bilo treba poudariti, da je Komisija pred izbiro vzorca od vseh proizvajalcev Unije, za katere je bilo znano, da jih to zadeva, zahtevala informacije, da bi zbrala ustrezne podatke za izbiro vzorca.
As mentioned in point 5.2.1 of the NOI, this information was available as from the date of the initiation of the investigation in the file for inspection by interested parties and was not such as to show the state of the economic situation of the respondents.
Kot je navedeno v točki 5.2.1 obvestila o začetku, so bile te informacije na voljo od datuma začetka preiskave v dokumentaciji, ki je na vpogled zainteresiranim stranem, in niso izražale gospodarskega položaja poročevalcev.
Hence, the Commission had sufficient relevant information at its disposal to select a representative sample respecting the criteria of Article 17 of the basic Regulation but could not make any result-oriented selection of companies.
Zato je imela Komisija na voljo dovolj ustreznih informacij za izbiro reprezentativnega vzorca, pri čemer je upoštevala merila iz člena 17 osnovne uredbe, vendar ni mogla izbrati družb na način, ki bi bil usmerjen k rezultatom.
The above claims were therefore rejected.
Navedene trditve so bile zato zavrnjene.
Even though this claim was not substantiated, the information available has shown that bioethanol produced from sugar beet represents only a minor part of total Union production, around 12 % in 2011, and that two of the companies included in the sample partially use sugar beet as feedstock to produce bioethanol.
Čeprav ta trditev ni bila utemeljena, je bilo na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ugotovljeno, da bioetanol, proizveden iz sladkorne pese, predstavlja samo majhen del celotne proizvodnje Unije, in sicer približno 12 % leta 2011, in da dve družbi, vključeni v vzorec, sladkorno peso delno uporabljata kot surovino za proizvodnjo bioetanola.
Therefore, the claim is rejected.
Zato se ta zahtevek zavrne.
Based on the above, it is considered that the sample selected as explained above for the purpose of the injury analysis is representative for the Union industry.
Na podlagi tega se šteje, da je vzorec, izbran po zgoraj opisanem postopku za namen analize škode, reprezentativen za industrijo Unije.
In view of the potentially large number of importers involved in the proceeding, sampling was envisaged for importers in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Ker lahko postopek vključuje veliko število uvoznikov, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku za uvoznike predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
Questionnaires were thus sent to the sampled USA exporters/producers, the sampled Union producers, the three cooperating unrelated importers in the Union and to all users known to be concerned by the investigation.
Vprašalniki so bili tako poslani vzorčenim izvoznikom/proizvajalcem ZDA, vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, trem sodelujočim nepovezanim uvoznikom v Uniji in vsem uporabnikom, za katere je znano, da jih preiskava zadeva.
Replies were received from the sampled USA exporters/producers, the sampled Union producers, two unrelated importers and four users.
Odgovori so bili prejeti od vzorčenih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev ZDA, vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, dveh nepovezanih uvoznikov in štirih uporabnikov.
The Commission sought and verified all the information provided by interested parties and deemed necessary for the purposes of a definitive determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani in so se zdele potrebne za namene dokončne določitve dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Exporters/producers in the USA
Proizvajalci/izvozniki v ZDA
POET LLC, Wichita, Kansas and Sioux Falls, South Dakota
POET LLC, Wichita, Kansas in Sioux Falls, Južna Dakota
Unrelated trader in the USA
Nepovezani trgovec v ZDA
Bio Urja Trading LLC, Houston, Texas
Bio Urja Trading LLC, Houston, Teksas
BioWanze S.A., Wanze, Belgium
BioWanze S.A., Wanze, Belgija
Lantmännen Energi/Agroetanol, Norrköping, Sweden
Lantmännen Energi / Agroetanol, Norrköping, Švedska
The product concerned is bioethanol, sometimes referred to as ‘fuel ethanol’, i.e. ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products (as listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), denatured or undenatured, excluding products with a water content of more than 0,3 % (m/m) measured according to the standard EN 15376, but including ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products (as listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) contained in blends with gasoline with an ethyl alcohol content of more than 10 % (v/v) originating in the USA, currently falling within CN codes ex22071000, ex22072000, ex22089099, ex27101221, ex27101225, ex27101231, ex27101241, ex27101245, ex27101249, ex27101251, ex27101259, ex27101270, ex27101290, ex38140010, ex38140090, ex38200000 and ex38249097.
Zadevni izdelek je bioetanol, včasih imenovan „etanol za gorivo“, tj. etilni alkohol, proizveden iz kmetijskih proizvodov (kot je navedeno v Prilogi I k Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije), denaturiran ali nedenaturiran, razen izdelkov z vsebnostjo vode več kot 0,3 % (m/m), izmerjeno v skladu s standardom EN 15376, vendar vključno z etilnim alkoholom, proizvedenim iz kmetijskih proizvodov (kot je navedeno v Prilogi I k Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije), vsebovanim v mešanicah bencina z vsebnostjo etilnega alkohola več kot 10 % (v/v) s poreklom iz ZDA, trenutno uvrščenim pod oznake KN ex22071000, ex22072000, ex22089099,, ex27101221, ex27101225, ex27101231, ex27101241, ex27101245, ex27101249, ex27101251, ex27101259, ex27101270, ex27101290, ex38140010, ex38140090, ex38200000 in ex38249097.
Bioethanol can be produced from various agricultural feedstocks, such as sugar cane, sugar beet, potatoes, manioc and corn.
Bioetanol je mogoče proizvajati iz različnih kmetijskih surovin, na primer iz sladkornega trsa, sladkorne pese, krompirja, manioka in koruze.
In the USA a distinction on the basis of the various feedstocks is made, as described below:
V ZDA se bioetanol razlikuje glede na različne surovine, iz katerih je proizveden, kot je navedeno spodaj:
The Conventional Biofuel (mainly produced from corn feedstock and commonly called corn ethanol) which is defined as a renewable fuel derived from corn starch produced from facilities that commenced construction after the date of enactment of the Energy Independence and Security Act in December 2007 [5] and which must achieve in the future a 20 % reduction in greenhouse gas (‘GHG’) emissions compared to baseline lifecycle GHG emissions of gasoline and diesel.
konvencionalno biogorivo (ki se proizvaja zlasti iz koruze in se pogosto imenuje koruzni etanol), ki je opredeljeno kot obnovljivo gorivo, pridobljeno iz koruznega škroba, ki se proizvaja v obratih, katerih gradnja se je začela po datumu sprejetja Zakona o energetski neodvisnosti in varnosti decembra 2007 [5], ter s katerim je treba v prihodnosti doseči 20 % zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v primerjavi z osnovnimi emisijami toplogrednih plinov v življenjskem ciklu bencina in dizelskega goriva;
The Advanced Biofuel which is defined as a renewable fuel other than ethanol derived from corn starch, which is derived from renewable biomass and has lifecycle GHG emissions, as determined by the Energy Policy Act (‘EPA’) Administrator, that are at least 50 % less than baseline GHG emissions.
napredno biogorivo, ki je opredeljeno kot obnovljivo gorivo, razen etanola, pridobljenega iz koruznega škroba, ter ki je pridobljeno iz obnovljive biomase in katerega emisije toplogrednih plinov v življenjskem ciklu, kot jih določa Zakon o energetski politiki (Energy Policy Act, v nadaljnjem besedilu: EPA), so vsaj 50 % manjše od povprečnih emisij toplogrednih plinov.
This term includes ‘cellulosic biofuels’ such as bioethanol and ‘biomass-based diesel’.
Ta izraz vključuje „celulozna biogoriva“, kot sta bioetanol in „dizelsko gorivo na osnovi biomase“.
More specifically, Cellulosic Biofuel [6] is defined as a renewable fuel derived from any cellulose, hemicellulose, or lignin that is derived from renewable biomass and that has lifecycle GHG emissions, as determined by the EPA Administrator, that are at least 60 % less than the baseline lifecycle GHG emissions.
To pomeni, da je celulozno biogorivo [6] opredeljeno kot obnovljivo gorivo, pridobljeno iz katere koli vrste celuloze, hemiceluloze ali lignina, pridobljenega iz obnovljive biomase in katerega emisije toplogrednih plinov v življenjskem ciklu, kot jih določa EPA, so vsaj 60 % manjše od osnovnih emisij toplogrednih plinov v življenjskem ciklu.
Cellulosic biofuels include cellulosic bioethanol.
Celulozni bioetanol spada med celulozna biogoriva.
There are researches and pilot projects largely supported by the US Federal Government for producing Advanced Biofuels and in particular cellulosic bioethanol, produced in particular out of agricultural and forestry wastes.
Zvezna vlada ZDA široko podpira raziskave in pilotne projekte na področju proizvodnje naprednih biogoriv, zlasti celuloznega bioetanola, proizvedenega predvsem iz odpadkov iz kmetijstva in gozdarstva.
During the investigation period up to now corn has been the main feedstock used in the USA, while the main feedstock used in the Union is wheat.
Glavna surovina, ki se je v ZDA uporabljala v obdobju preiskave in se uporablja tudi zdaj, je koruza, glavna surovina v Uniji pa je pšenica.
The investigation showed that bioethanol is generally sold in its pure form to blenders/traders which blend [8] it with gasoline in particular to produce high-level blends which are exported or sold on the domestic market for further blending and used for fuel consumption.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se bioetanol običajno prodaja v čisti obliki pripravljavcem mešanic/trgovcem, ki ga mešajo [8] zlasti z bencinom, pri čemer nastanejo mešanice z visoko stopnjo biogoriva, ki se izvažajo ali prodajajo na domačem trgu za nadaljnje mešanje ali potrošnjo.
To identify the various types of bioethanol, bioethanol blends or mixtures in use around the world, ethanol fuel mixtures have ‘E’ numbers which describe the percentage of ethanol fuel in the mixture by volume.
Mešanice goriva z etanolom so zaradi lažje opredelitve različnih vrst ali mešanic bioetanola, ki se uporabljajo po svetu, označene s števili E, ki pomenijo volumenski procentualni delež etanolnega goriva v mešanici.
Blends of E10 or less have been used in more than twenty countries around the world by 2011, led by the USA, where almost all retail gasoline sold in 2010 was blended with 10 % of bioethanol.
Mešanice z oznako E10 ali manj so se do leta 2011 uporabljale v več kot dvajsetih državah po svetu, v največjem obsegu pa v ZDA, kjer je bil skoraj ves bencin, ki je bil leta 2010 prodan na drobno, mešan z 10 % bioetanola.
As a result of their energy policy the USA became the largest worldwide producer of bioethanol as from 2005 accounting for 57,5 % of global production.
ZDA so zaradi svoje energetske politike od leta 2005 vodilna svetovna proizvajalka bioetanola, pri čemer njihova proizvodnja predstavlja 57,5 % delež svetovne proizvodnje.
In 2009, the requirements under the EPA ensured that at least 11 billion US gallons of renewable fuels were produced, in particular to keep up with the targets established by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
V skladu z zahtevami EPA je bilo leta 2009 zagotovljeno, da je bilo v ZDA proizvedenih vsaj 11 milijard ameriških galon obnovljivih goriv zlasti zaradi izpolnjevanja ciljev iz Zakona o energetski neodvisnosti in varnosti (Energy Independence and Security Act – EISA) iz leta 2007.
The large-scale production also allowed US producers to become exporter of bioethanol to other markets, including the Union.
Proizvodnja v velikem obsegu je proizvajalcem iz Združenih držav omogočila tudi izvoz bioetanola na druge trge, vključno z Unijo.
Based on official sources, market and publicly available information [9], all types of bioethanol and bioethanol in blends, namely mixtures of bioethanol with mineral gasoline as explained in recital 43 above, which are produced in the USA and sold either in the USA or exported are considered to be bioethanol fuels and are part of a legislative package concerning energy efficiency and renewable energy and alternative fuels in the USA.
Na podlagi uradnih virov informacij, tržnih informacij in javno dostopnih informacij [9] se vse vrste bioetanola in bioetanola, vsebovanega v mešanicah, tj. mešanicah bioetanola in mineralnega bencina, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 43, ki se proizvedejo v ZDA in se prodajo v ZDA ali izvozijo, obravnavajo kot bioetanolna goriva in so del zakonodajnega svežnja o energetski učinkovitosti, obnovljivi energiji in alternativnih gorivih v ZDA.
It has been found that all types of bioethanol and bioethanol in blends covered by this investigation, despite possible differences in terms of feedstock used for the production, or variances in the production process, have the same or very similar basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and are used for the same purposes.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imajo vse vrste bioetanola in bioetanola v mešanicah, vključene v to preiskavo, kljub možnim razlikam v zvezi s surovinami, uporabljenimi pri proizvodnji, ali razlikam v proizvodnem postopku, enake ali zelo podobne osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter da se uporabljajo za enake namene.
The possible minor variations in the product concerned do not alter its basic definition, its characteristics or the perception that various parties have of it.
Morebitne manjše spremembe zadevnega izdelka ne spremenijo njegove osnovne opredelitve, njegovih lastnosti ali tega, kako jih dojemajo različne strani.
Hence, they claimed that the investigation should cover ethanol for all uses and ethanol from all sources, including synthetic ethanol that competes with bioethanol for industrial use.
Zato so trdile, da bi moral biti v preiskavo vključen etanol za vse namene in etanol iz vseh virov, vključno s sintetičnim etanolom, ki je konkurenčen bioetanolu za industrijske namene.
Another party claimed the opposite, namely that the investigation should only cover bioethanol for fuel applications and that bioethanol for industrial use should thus be excluded.
Neka stran je trdila nasprotno, in sicer, da bi moral biti v preiskavo vključen samo bioetanol, ki se uporablja kot gorivo, medtem ko bi bilo treba bioetanol za industrijske namene iz nje izključiti.
In this context, it is noted that the product concerned should primarily be defined on the basis of its basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and not its uses or applications.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da je treba zadevni proizvod opredeliti predvsem na podlagi njegovih osnovnih fizikalnih, tehničnih in kemijskih lastnosti ter ne na podlagi njegovih načinov rabe ali uporabe.
A product which has various applications may indeed have the same or similar basic characteristics notwithstanding its further use and in certain circumstances it may be necessary to deepen the analysis of the product definition and the product scope in the light of the specificity of the industry and the market.
Izdelek, ki se lahko uporablja na različne načine, lahko ima dejansko enake ali podobne osnovne lastnosti ne glede na nadaljnjo uporabo, zato je morda v nekaterih okoliščinah potrebna podrobnejša analiza opredelitve in obsega izdelka ob upoštevanju specifičnosti industrije in trga.
There is no producer that focuses on the production of that product which took part in this investigation.
Pri tej preiskavi ni sodeloval noben proizvajalec, ki je usmerjen v proizvodnjo navedenega izdelka.
Contrary to the suggestion made by some parties, this clarification does not lead to a change in the scope of the investigation or the definition of the product concerned and did not have any impact on the quality of the data used.
V nasprotju z domnevo, ki so jo izrazile nekatere strani, to pojasnilo ne privede do spremembe obsega preiskave ali opredelitve zadevnega izdelka in nima nobenega učinka na kakovost uporabljenih podatkov.
Bioethanol for fuel application and bioethanol destined to other applications may have similar characteristics.
Bioetanol, ki se uporablja kot gorivo, in bioetanol za druge namene lahko imata podobne lastnosti.
However, during the investigation dumping was examined at the level of USA operators which produced or blended bioethanol for fuel application, namely bioethanol to be included in a fuel mixture.
Vendar se je med preiskavo preučil damping na ravni dobaviteljev iz ZDA, ki proizvajajo ali ustvarjajo mešanice bioetanola, ki se uporablja kot gorivo, tj. bioetanola, ki se uporablja v mešanicah goriv.
Similarly, the investigation of Union producers focussed on bioethanol destined to fuel applications and not for other uses.
Podobno je bila preiskava proizvajalcev Unije osredotočena na bioetanol, ki se uporablja kot gorivo in ne za druge namene.
Hence, bioethanol destined to applications other than fuel should not be covered by the scope of this investigation.
Zato bioetanol, ki je namesto za gorivo namenjen za druge načine uporabe, ne bi smel biti vključen v to preiskavo.
The importers which will not use the imported USA bioethanol for fuel application have the possibility to make a declaration subject to the end use provisions as established by the Implementing provisions embedded in Articles 291 to 300 of the Union Customs Code [10].
Uvozniki, ki bioetanola, uvoženega iz ZDA, ne bodo uporabljali kot gorivo, lahko dajo izjavo na podlagi določil o končni uporabi, kot to določajo izvedbene določbe iz členov 291 do 300 carinskega zakonika Unije [10].
It was found that bioethanol manufactured by the Union industry and sold on the Union market have similar basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics when compared to bioethanol exported to the Union from the USA.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ima bioetanol, ki ga proizvaja industrija Unije in se prodaja na trgu Unije, podobne osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti kot bioetanol, ki se iz ZDA izvaža v Unijo.
As described in recital 39 above, bioethanol can be produced from various feedstocks.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 39, se lahko bioetanol proizvaja iz različnih surovin.
However, the investigation did not point to the fact that the feedstock used would lead into any differences in the characteristics of the end-product.
Vendar preiskava ni pokazala, da bi se lastnosti končnega izdelka kakor koli razlikovale zaradi uporabljene surovine.
It was found that the product concerned produced in the USA in particular from corn and exported to the Union is interchangeable with that produced in particular from wheat and sold in the Union by Union producers.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je zadevni izdelek, ki se proizvaja v ZDA zlasti iz koruze in izvaža v Unijo, zamenljiv z izdelkom, ki ga proizvajalci Unije proizvajajo zlasti iz pšenice in prodajajo v Uniji.
In addition, there are no significant differences, if any, in the uses and the perception by operators and users in the market concerning bioethanol.
Poleg tega ni znatnih razlik, če sploh obstajajo, v zvezi s tem, kako zadevna izdelka uporabljajo in dojemajo subjekti in uporabniki na trgu z bioetanolom.
It is therefore confirmed that bioethanol produced and sold in the Union and the product concerned exported from the USA should be considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se upošteva, da bi bilo treba bioetanol, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v Uniji, ter zadevni izdelek, ki se izvaža iz ZDA, obravnavati kot podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Some of the sampled US producers claimed that the bioethanol produced and sold on the USA market is not like the product concerned, since it does not strictly correspond to the wording of the product description as laid out in the notice of initiation.
Nekateri vzorčeni proizvajalci iz ZDA so trdili, da bioetanol, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na trgu ZDA, ni podoben zadevnemu izdelku, ker ne ustreza natančno opisu izdelka iz obvestila o začetku.
Effectively, the types bioethanol sold on the USA market have a water content above the threshold of 0,3 % and corresponds to the USA standard (ASTM) rather than EN 15376.
Vrste bioetanola, ki se prodajajo na trgu ZDA, imajo namreč vsebnost vode nad pragom 0,3 % in ustrezajo standardu ZDA (ASTM) in ne EN 15376.
However, the investigation showed that bioethanol produced for sales on the US market largely shares the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics as the product concerned.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da ima bioetanol, ki se proizvaja za prodajo na trgu ZDA, večinoma enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti kot zadevni izdelek.