natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 31 December 1996, it was replaced by the new public service contract.
31. decembra 1996 je to pogodbo nadomestila nova pogodba o izvajanju javne službe.
RTP must: (a) respect the principles of freedom, independence, non-discrimination and non-concentration; (b) safeguard its independence from the public authorities; and (c) adapt programmes to quality and variety requirements in the interests of the public.
Javna televizija RTP mora: (a) spoštovati načelo svobode, neodvisnosti, prepovedi razlikovanja in prepovedi koncentracije; (b) ščititi svojo neodvisnost pred državnimi organi in (c) programe prilagoditi tako, da bodo izpolnjevali zahteve glede kakovosti in raznolikosti, ki so v interesu javnosti.
RTP must: (a) and (c) to contribute to enlightening, informing and educating the population; (b) to guarantee news coverage: (d) to (h) to make broadcasting time available for official messages, religious events, political parties, trade unions, the government and the public administration; (i) to broadcast two general coverage programmes, one of which should cover the Autonomous Regions of Madeira and the Azores; (j) and (m) to broadcast programmes on education, training, sport and culture; (l) to support and promote the cinema; (n) to keep audiovisual files; (o) to exchange programmes and information with Madeira and the Azores; (p) to produce and broadcast programmes for Portuguese communities abroad; (q) to cooperate with Portuguese-speaking countries; (r) to ensure direct coverage of main events abroad; (s) to maintain contacts with other European public service television broadcasters; and (t) to ensure that television broadcasting is in conformity with the guidelines laid down by the competent international bodies.
Javna televizija RTP mora: (a) in (c) prispevati k poučevanju, obveščanju in izobraževanju javnosti; (b) zagotoviti pokrivanje aktualnih dogodkov; (d) do (h) omogočiti programski čas za uradna sporočila, verske dogodke, politične stranke, sindikate, vlado in javno upravo; (i) oddajati dva splošna programa, pri čemer bi moral eden od njiju pokrivati avtonomni regiji Madeire in Azorov; (j) in (m) oddajati programe, namenjene izobraževanju, usposabljanju, športu in kulturi; (l) podpirati kinematografe; (n) hraniti avdiovizualne vsebine; (o) programe in informacije izmenjevati z Madeiro in Azori; (p) pripravljati in oddajati programe za portugalske skupnosti v tujini; (q) sodelovati s portugalsko govorečimi državami; (r) zagotavljati neposredno pokrivanje pomembnih dogodkov v tujini; (s) vzdrževati stike z drugimi evropskimi javnimi službami radiotelevizije; in (t) zagotoviti, da je razširjanje televizijskih programov v skladu s smernicami pristojnih mednarodnih organov.
Clause 4 of the old public service contract and Clauses 4 and 5 of the new public service contract.
Klavzula 4 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe ter klavzuli 4 in 5 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Clauses 5 to 8 and Clause 10 of the old public service contract and Clauses 6 to 13 of the new public service contract.
Klavzule 5–8 in klavzula 10 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in klavzule 6–13 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Clause 1 of the old public service contract stated that the aim of that contract was to lay down the terms under which RTP would provide the public television service.
Klavzula 1 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe je navajala, da je cilj pogodbe določiti pogoje, pod katerimi bi javna televizija RTP zagotavljala storitve javne televizije.
Clause 1 of the new public service contract states that RTP is the sole provider of public service broadcasting within the meaning of Article 5 of Law No 58/90 and of Article 4 of Law No 21/92.
Klavzula 1 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe navaja, da je javna televizija RTP edini ponudnik storitev javne radiotelevizije v smislu člena 5 Zakona št. 58/90 in člena 4 Zakona št. 21/92.
Clause 9 of the old public service contract and Clause 23 of the new public service contract.
Klavzula 9 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in klavzula 23 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Clauses 15, 16, 18 and 19 of the old public service contract and Clauses 18 and 25 of the new public service contract.
Klavzule 15, 16, 18 in 19 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe ter klavzuli 18 in 25 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Clause 19 of the old public service contract, Clause 25 of the new public service contract and Article 47(2) of Law No 31-A/98.
Klavzula 19 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe, klavzula 25 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in člen 47(2) Zakona št. 31-A/98.
The full name of the auditor is: ‘Pedro Roque SROC, Revisores Oficias de Contas, inscrita na Lista das SROC/s com no 125’, Lisbon.
Polno ime revizorja je: „Pedro Roque SROC, Revisores Oficias de Contas, inscrita na Lista das SROC/s com no 125“, Lizbona.
It is a statutory auditor registered in the official list of auditors in Portugal, which means the auditor has to adhere to certain auditing standards and give an independent audit view.
Je zakoniti revizor, registriran na uradnem seznamu revizorjev na Portugalskem, kar pomeni, da mora revizor upoštevati določene revizijske standarde in podati neodvisno mnenje.
BDO Binder & Co. Auditoria, Impostos e Consultoria, Lisbon, Portugal.
BDO Binder&Co. Auditoria, Impostos e Consultoria, Lizbona, Portugalska.
Clause 13 of the old public service contract and Clause 20 of the new public service contract.
Klavzula 13 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in klavzula 20 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Clause 14 of the old public service contract and Clause 21 of the new public service contract.
Klavzula 14 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in klavzula 21 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Clause 12 of the old public service contract lays down in detail which costs may be compensated for and how they are to be calculated: the coverage differential (the difference in costs borne by RTP Channel 1 and the costs borne by the largest private television operator), the operating deficit in the Autonomous Regions, the deficit in running the audiovisual library, the operational cost of RTP-International, the cost of operating the structure for cooperation with the Portuguese-speaking African countries (PALOPs), the cost of allowing viewing time for certain entities, the cost of delegations and correspondents, and the costs of the S. Carlos National Theatre Foundation.
Klavzula 12 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe podrobno določa, za katere stroške se lahko dodeli nadomestilo in kako se izračunajo: razlika pri pokrivanju (razlika med stroški 1. kanala javne televizije RTP in stroški največjih zasebnih televizijskih operaterjev), primanjkljaj iz poslovanja avtonomnih regij, primanjkljaj pri upravljanju avdiovizualne knjižnice, stroški poslovanja mednarodne televizije RTP, strošek upravljanja strukture sodelovanja s portugalsko govorečimi afriškimi državami (PALOP), strošek zagotavljanja programskega časa za določene subjekte, strošek predstavnikov in dopisnikov ter stroški nacionalne gledališke ustanove S. Carlos.
Clause 15 of the new public service contract lays down in detail which costs can be compensated for and how they are to be calculated.
Klavzula 15 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe podrobno določa, za katere stroške se lahko dodeli nadomestilo in kako se izračunajo.
The items to be covered are: (1) the operating costs of RTP 1 and RTP 2; (2) specific services referred to in Clause 7(a) to (l); and (3) the coverage differential.
Postavke, ki so pokrite, so: 1. stroški poslovanja javne televizije RTP 1 in RTP 2; 2. posebne storitve iz klavzule 7(a) do (l); 3. razlika pri pokrivanju.
Information provided by Portugal by letter of 31 March 1999.
Informacije, ki jih je Portugalska predložila z dopisom z dne 31. marca 1999.
Clause 14(2) of the new public service contract.
Klavzula 14(2) nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Excluding the cost associated with the coverage differential.
Brez stroškov, povezanih z razliko pri pokritju.
Clause 19(1) and (3) of the new public service contract.
Klavzuli 19(1) in (3) nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
The new public service contract provided that the operating costs of RTP 2 could be compensated for retroactively from 1 January 1996.
Nova pogodba o izvajanju javne službe določa, da se lahko od 1. januarja 1996 stroški poslovanja kanala RTP 2 povrnejo za nazaj.
Although Sport TV is not a public service activity eligible for compensation, RTP deducted the profits of Sport TV from the public service cost.
Čeprav kanal Sport TV ni dejavnost javne službe, ki bi bila upravičena do nadomestila, je javna televizija RTP dobiček kanala Sport TV odbila od stroškov javne službe.
The basis for this deduction is Article 47(3) of Law No 31-A/98 of 14 July 1998, which provides that profits made by RTP from participation in other channels are to be used for the financing of public service initiatives.
Podlaga za odbitek je člen 47(3) Zakona št. 31-A/98 z dne 14. julija 1998, ki določa, da se dobički, ki jih RTP ustvari z udeležbo v drugih kanalih, uporabijo za financiranje pobud javnih služb.
Comments from interested parties on other measures can be found in recitals 74 to 84 of Decision 2005/406/EC.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani o drugih ukrepih so obravnavane v uvodnih izjavah 74 do 84 Odločbe 2005/406/ES.
See, for instance, Rui Gerra da Fonseca: Having established the legislative nature of the statutes of a public undertaking based on a decree law, it is unconstitutional for them to be amended by any instrument other than a decree law, just as rules permitting their amendment by a mere instrument of private law are also unconstitutional, Autonomia Estatutária das Empresas Publicas e Descentralização Administrativa, Coimbra 2005.
Glej, na primer, Rui Guerra da Fonseca: Ker je zakonodajna narava statuta javnega podjetja določena z uredbo z zakonsko močjo, bi bilo neustavno, če bi bil statut spremenjen s katerim drugim aktom kot z uredbo z zakonsko močjo, tako kot so neustavni tudi predpisi, ki omogočajo spremembo statutov z aktom zasebnega prava, Autonomia Estatutária das Empresas Publicas e Descentralização Administrativa, Coimbra 2005.
Judgment No 224/95 of 26 April 1995 and Judgment No 576/96 of 16 April 1996.
Sodba št. 224/95 z dne 26. aprila 1995 in sodba št. 576/96 z dne 16. aprila 1996.
Submission by Portugal of 8 June 2010.
Pripombe Portugalske z dne 8. junija 2010.
Submission by Portugal 17 June 2011.
Pripombe Portugalske z dne 17. junija 2011.
Law No 91/A/77 annulled the 1976 Statutes of RTP and it provided that RTP would be governed by an Administrative Commission.
Zakon št. 91/A/77 je razveljavil statut RTP iz leta 1976 in določil, da bo javno televizijo RTP vodil upravni svet.
See Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2001 in Case C-53/00 Ferring SA v Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS) [2001] ECR I-9067.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 22. novembra 2001 v zadevi C-53/00, Ferring SA proti Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS), Recueil 2001, str. I-9067.
Clauses 3 and 4 of the new public service contract.
Klavzuli 3 in 4 nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.
Clause 14 of the old public service contract and Clause 21(3) of the new public service contract stipulate that: ‘Participation in the abovementioned investments shall be covered preferably by the first contracting party and as shareholder in the form of an increase in capital.’.
Klavzula 14 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in klavzula 21(3) nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe navajata: „Udeležbo pri navedenih naložbah po možnosti pokrije prva pogodbena stranka in kot delničar v obliki povečanja kapitala.“
See paragraph 108 of the letter from Portugal of 7 September 2009.
Glej odstavek 108 dopisa Portugalske z dne 7. septembra 2009.
See footnote 36 of this Decision.
Glej opombo 36 tega sklepa.
Point 10 of the Commission notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3).
Točka 10 Obvestila Komisije o uporabi pravil državne pomoči za ukrepe, ki zadevajo neposredno obdavčitev ustvarjenega dohodka (UL C 384, 10.12.1998, str. 3).
Judgment by the Court of Justice of 17 February 1993 in Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Christian Poucet v Assurances Générales de France and Caisse Mutuelle Régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon [1993] ECR I-637.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. februarja 1993 v združenih zadevah C-159/91 in C-160/91, Christian Poucet proti Assurances Générales de France in Caisse Mutuelle Régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon, Recueil 1993, str. I-637.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 June 1999 in Case C-295/97 Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA v International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH and Ministero della Difesa [1999] ECR I-3735, paragraph 35.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. junija 1999 v zadevi C-295/97, Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA proti International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH et Ministero della Difesa, Recueil 1999, str. I-3735, točka 35.
See paragraph 64 of Judgment in Case T-442/03,
Glej točko 64 sodbe v zadevi T-442/03.
See paragraph 51 of Judgment in Case T-442/03.
Glej točko 51 sodbe v zadevi T-442/03.
See paragraphs 214 to 221 of the submission by Portugal of 8 June 2010.
Glej odstavke 214–221 pripombe Portugalske z dne 8. junija 2010.
See paragraphs 75 to 77 of Judgment in Case T-442/03.
Glej točke 75–77 sodbe v zadevi T-442/03.
See also judgment of the Court of 8 November 2001 in C-14/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH and Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH v Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten [2001] ECR I-8365.
Glej tudi sodbo Sodišča z dne 8. novembra 2001 v zadevi C-14/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH in Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH proti Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten, Recueil 2001, str. I-08365.
Law No 91/A/77 stipulated that an Administrative Council should govern RTP on account of its structural crisis.
Zakon št. 91/A/77 je določal, da bi moral zaradi njenih strukturnih težav javno televizijo RTP upravljati upravni svet.
See Judgment of the Court in Case C-342/96, Kingdom of Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-02459.
Glej sodbo Sodišča v zadevi C-342/96, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str. I-02459.
Commission communication to the Member States — Application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector (OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p. 3).
Sporočilo Komisije državam članicam o uporabi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe EGS in člena 5 Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS o javnih podjetjih v predelovalni industriji (UL C 307, 13.11.1993, str. 3).
The reference rate is based on the five-year interbank swap rate plus a premium (see Commission notice on the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3). The reference rates for Portugal since 1 January 1997 can be found at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html
Referenčna mera temelji na medbančni menjalni obrestni meri petih let plus premija (glej Obvestilo Komisije o načinu določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj, UL C 273, 9.9.1997, str. 3). Referenčne mere za Portugalsko od 1. januarja 1997 so na voljo na: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html.
See judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2002 in joined Cases Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco SA (T-299/00) and SIC — Sociedade Independente de Comunicação SA (T-300/00) v Commission [2002] ECR II-3805.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. oktobra 2002 v združenih zadevah Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (zadeva T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (zadeva T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (zadeva T-299/00) in SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA (zadeva T-300/00) proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. II-3805.
In accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice, when State aid strengthens the position of an undertaking compared with other undertakings competing in intra-Union trade, the latter must be regarded as affected by that State aid.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča je treba takrat, kadar pomoč krepi položaj podjetja v primerjavi z drugimi podjetji, ki konkurirajo na notranjem trgu Unije, ta podjetja obravnavati kot podjetja, na katera vpliva navedena pomoč.
See Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1980 in Cases 730/79 Philip Morris Holland v Commission [1980] ECR 671, paragraph 11; judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1991 in Case C-303/88 Italian Republic v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 17; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2000 in Case C-156/98 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 33.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevah 730/79, Philip Morris Holland proti Komisiji, Recueil 1980, str. 671, točka 11; sodbo Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi C-303/88, Italijanska republika proti Komisiji, Recueil 1991, str. I-1433, točka 17; sodbo Sodišča z dne 19. septembra 2000 v zadevi C-156/98, Zvezna republika Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2000, str. I-6857, točka 33.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH et Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, Recueil 2003, str. I-7747.
Ibidem, paragraphs 101 to 109.
Prejšnja opomba, uvodne izjave 101–109.
In those paragraphs the Court examined the question of whether some state payments to transport undertakings classified as State aid could be found to be compatible with the common market under Article 77 of the EC Treaty [now Article 93 TFEU] as reimbursement for the discharge of public service obligations.
V teh odstavkih je Sodišče preučilo vprašanje, ali se nekatera državna plačila prevoznim podjetjem, ki so bila ocenjena kot državna pomoč, lahko razglasi za združljiva s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 77 Pogodbe ES [zdaj člena 93 PDEU] kot povračilo za opravljanje obveznosti javne službe.
It did not rule out this possibility, provided that the binding conditions laid down by the secondary legislation for the transport sector were met.
Te možnosti ni izključilo, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjeni zavezujoči pogoji, ki jih za sektor prevoza določa sekundarna zakonodaja.
This reasoning must apply mutatis mutandis to undertaking entrusted with an SGEI outside the transport sector and in relation to Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty [now 106 (2) TFEU].
Ta razlaga se mora smiselno uporabljati za podjetja, ki so zadolžena za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena izven prevoznega sektorja in v povezavi s členom 86(2) Pogodbe ES [zdaj členom 106(2) PDEU].
It is still the 2001 Communication which applies to this case for reasons of ratione temporis.
Za to zadevo zaradi časovne veljavnosti (ratione temporis) še vedno velja sporočilo iz leta 2001.
See paragraph 29 of the Broadcasting communication.
Glej odstavek 29 Sporočila o radiodifuziji.
The Amsterdam Protocol considers that the system of public broadcasting is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism.
Protokol Amsterdamske pogodbe meni, da je sistem javne radiotelevizije neposredno povezan z demokratičnimi, socialnimi in kulturnimi potrebami vsake družbe in s potrebo po ohranitvi medijskega pluralizma.
More specifically, Member States have ‘the competence […] to provide for the funding of public service broadcasting insofar as such funding is granted to broadcasting organisations for the fulfilment of the public service remit as conferred, defined and organised by each Member State, and in so far as such funding does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Community to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest, while the realisation of the remit of that public service shall be taken into account’.
Natančneje, države članice imajo „pristojnost […] glede financiranja storitev javne radiotelevizije, če je tako financiranje odobreno radiotelevizijskim zavodom za opravljanje javne službe, kakor jo naloži, opredeli in organizira vsaka država članica, in če ne vpliva na trgovinske pogoje in konkurenco v Skupnosti do te mere, da bi bilo to v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi, pri čemer je treba upoštevati dejansko zagotavljanje teh javnih storitev.“
See paragraph 33 of the Broadcasting Communication.
Glej odstavek 33 Sporočila o radiodifuziji.
Ibidem.
Glej prejšnjo opombo.
See paragraph 81 of the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-442/03.
Glej točko 81 sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje v zadevi T-442/03.
The Commission’s statement that the transformation was not necessary was not made in the context of the compatibility assessment under Article 86(2) EC Treaty, now Article 106(2) TFEU.
Izjava Komisije, da preoblikovanje ni bilo potrebno, ni bila podana v okviru ocene združljivosti na podlagi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES, zdaj člena 106(2) PDEU.
See paragraph 139 of the Judgment of the General Court in Joined Case T-568/08 and T-573/08, Métropole télévision (M6) and Télévision française 1 SA (TFI), not yet published in the Court reports.
Glej točko 139 sodbe Splošnega sodišča v združenih zadevah T-568/08 in T-573/08, Métropole télévision (M6) in Télévision française 1 SA (TFI), še ni objavljena v poročilih Sodišča.
According to Article 5, ‘Member States shall ensure […] that broadcasters reserve at least 10 % of their transmission time […], or alternately, […], at least 10 % of their programming budget, for European works created by producers who are independent of broadcasters. Furthermore, according to recital 45 to Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, the objective of supporting audiovisual production in Europe can be pursued within the Member State through the definition of a public interest mission for certain broadcasting organisations, […] including the obligation to contribute substantially to investment in European production’ ( OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p. 60), repealed by Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p. 1).
V skladu s členom 5 „Države članice […] zagotovijo, da […] izdajatelji televizijskih programov vsaj 10 % svojega oddajnega časa […] ali […] najmanj 10 % svojega programskega proračuna rezervirajo za evropska dela, ki jih ustvarijo producenti, neodvisni od izdajateljev televizijskih programov.“ Poleg tega je v skladu z uvodno izjavo 45 k Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/36/ES z dne 30. junija 1997, ki spreminja Direktivo Sveta 89/552/EGS o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov „cilj spodbujanja evropske avdiovizualne produkcije v državah članicah možno zasledovati […] z opredelitvijo poslanstva v zvezi z uresničevanjem javnega interesa nekaterih televizijskih organizacij, vključno z njihovo obveznostjo, da pomembno prispevajo k investiranju v evropsko produkcijo“ ( UL L 202, 30.7.1997, str. 60), kakor je bila razveljavljena z Direktivo 2010/13/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah), UL L 95, 15.4.2010, str. 1.
Clause 13 of the old public service contract and Clause 7(1)(a) of the new public service contract.
Klavzula 13 stare pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe in klavzula 7(1)(a) nove pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe.