natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Chemical pollution of surface water poses a threat to the aquatic environment, with effects such as acute and chronic toxicity in aquatic organisms, accumulation of pollutants in the ecosystem and loss of habitats and biodiversity, and also poses a threat to human health.
Kemično onesnaževanje površinskih voda ogroža vodno okolje z vplivi, kot so akutna in kronična toksičnost v vodnih organizmih, kopičenje onesnaževal v ekosistemih ter izguba habitatov in biotske raznovrstnosti, ogroža pa tudi zdravje ljudi.
As a matter of priority, causes of pollution should be identified and emissions of pollutants should be dealt with at source, in the most economically and environmentally effective manner.
Prednostno bi bilo treba ugotoviti vzroke onesnaženosti in se spopasti z emisijami onesnaževal pri viru na ekonomsko in okoljsko najbolj učinkovit način.
Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Union policy on the environment is to be based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should, as a priority, be rectified at source and that the polluter should pay.
V skladu s drugim stavkom člena 191(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) mora okoljska politika Unije temeljiti na previdnostnem načelu in na načelih, da je treba delovati preventivno, da je treba okoljsko škodo prednostno odpravljati pri viru in da mora plačati povzročitelj obremenitve.
Treating waste water can be very costly.
Čiščenje odpadnih voda je lahko zelo drago.
In order to facilitate cheaper and more cost effective treatment, the development of innovative water treatment technologies could be stimulated.
Da bi omogočili cenejše in stroškovno učinkovitejše čiščenje, bi lahko spodbujali razvoj inovativnih tehnologij za čiščenje voda.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy [4] lays down a strategy against the pollution of water.
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike [4] določa strategijo za preprečevanje onesnaževanja vode.
That strategy involves the identification of priority substances amongst those that pose a significant risk to, or via, the aquatic environment at Union level.
Del te strategije je, da se med tistimi snovmi, ki pomenijo znatno tveganje za vodno okolje ali tveganje, ki se prenaša po vodnem okolju, na ravni Unije opredelijo prednostne snovi.
Decision No 2455/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2001 establishing the list of priority substances in the field of water policy [5] set out the first list of 33 substances or groups of substances that were prioritised at Union level for inclusion in Annex X to Directive 2000/60/EC.
Z Odločbo št. 2455/2001/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. novembra 2001 o določitvi seznama prednostnih snovi na področju vodne politike [5] je bil določen prvi seznam 33 snovi ali skupin snovi, ki so bile prednostno razvrščene na ravni Unije zaradi vključitve v Prilogo X k Direktivi 2000/60/ES.
Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy [6] lays down environmental quality standards (EQS), in accordance with Directive 2000/60/EC, for the 33 priority substances identified in Decision No 2455/2001/EC and eight other pollutants that were already regulated at Union level.
Z Direktivo 2008/105/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o okoljskih standardih kakovosti na področju vodne politike [6] so bili v skladu z Direktivo 2000/60/ES določeni okoljski standardi kakovosti (OSK) za 33 prednostnih snovi iz Odločbe št. 2455/2001/ES in osem drugih onesnaževal, ki so že bila zakonsko urejena na ravni Unije.
Pursuant to Article 191(3) TFEU, in preparing its policy on the environment, the Union is to take account of available scientific and technical data, environmental conditions in the various regions of the Union, the potential benefits and costs of action or lack of action as well as the economic and social development of the Union as a whole and the balanced development of its regions.
V skladu s členom 191(3) PDEU mora Unija pri oblikovanju svoje okoljske politike upoštevati razpoložljive znanstvene in tehnične podatke, okoljske razmere v različnih regijah Unije, možne koristi in stroške ukrepanja ali neukrepanja ter gospodarski in socialni razvoj Unije kot celote in uravnotežen razvoj njenih regij.
Scientific, environmental and socio-economic factors, including human health considerations, should be taken into account in developing a cost-effective and proportionate policy on the prevention and control of chemical pollution of surface waters, including in reviewing the list of priority substances in accordance with Article 16(4) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Pri razvoju stroškovno učinkovite in sorazmerne politike o preprečevanju in nadzoru kemičnega onesnaževanja površinskih voda, vključno s pregledom seznama prednostnih snovi v skladu s členom 16(4) Direktive 2000/60/ES, bi bilo treba upoštevati znanstvene, okoljske in socialno-ekonomske dejavnike, vključno z vidiki, povezanimi z zdravjem ljudi.
In view of that aim, the polluter pays principle underpinning Directive 2000/60/EC should be consistently applied.
V ta namen bi bilo treba dosledno uporabljati načelo, na katerem temelji Direktiva 2000/60/ES, da plača povzročitelj obremenitve.
The Commission has conducted a review of the list of priority substances in accordance with Article 16(4) of Directive 2000/60/EC and with Article 8 of Directive 2008/105/EC and has come to the conclusion that it is appropriate to amend the list of priority substances by identifying new substances for priority action at Union level, setting EQS for those newly identified substances, revising the EQS for some existing substances in line with scientific progress and setting biota EQS for some existing and newly identified priority substances.
Komisija je po pregledu seznama prednostnih snovi v skladu s členom 16(4) Direktive 2000/60/ES in členom 8 Direktive 2008/105/ES zaključila, da je ustrezno spremeniti seznam prednostnih snovi, in sicer z določitvijo novih snovi, v zvezi s katerimi je treba prednostno ukrepati na ravni Unije, določitvijo OSK za te novo določene snovi, pregledom OSK za nekatere obstoječe snovi v skladu z znanstvenim napredkom ter določitvijo OSK za organizme za nekatere obstoječe in novo določene prednostne snovi.
The review of the priority substances list has been supported by an extensive consultation with experts from the Commission services, Member States, stakeholders and the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks.
Pregled seznama prednostnih snovi je bil podprt z obsežnimi posvetovanji s strokovnjaki služb Komisije, držav članic, zainteresiranih strani ter Znanstvenega odbora za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja.
The determination of surface water chemical status by the 2015 deadline laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2000/60/EC should be based, therefore, only on the substances and EQS set out in Directive 2008/105/EC in the version in force on 13 January 2009 unless those EQS are stricter than the revised EQS under this Directive, in which case the latter should be applied.
Ugotovitev kemijskega stanja površinskih voda do leta 2015, ki je rok, določen v členu 4 Direktive 2000/60/ES, bi zato morala temeljiti le na snoveh in OSK, določenih v Direktivi 2008/105/ES v različici, veljavni na dan 13. januarja 2009, razen če so ti OSK strožji kot pregledani OSK iz te direktive in se v tem primeru uporabijo slednji.
Since the adoption of Directive 2000/60/EC, numerous Union acts have been adopted, in accordance with Article 16(6) of that Directive, which constitute emission controls for individual priority substances.
Po sprejetju Direktive 2000/60/ES so bili v skladu s členom 16(6) navedene direktive sprejeti številni akti Unije, s katerimi so bili za posamezne prednostne snovi določeni ukrepi za nadzor nad emisijami.
Moreover, many environmental protection measures fall under the scope of other existing Union law.
Poleg tega veliko ukrepov za varstvo okolja spada na področje uporabe drugega veljavnega prava Unije.
Where the objectives laid down in Article 16(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC can be effectively achieved by existing instruments, priority should be given to implementing and revising those instruments rather than establishing new measures.
Kadar je cilje iz člena 16(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES mogoče učinkovito doseči z veljavnimi instrumenti, bi bilo treba prednost nameniti izvajanju in pregledu veljavnih instrumentov in ne uvedbi novih ukrepov.
The inclusion of a substance in Annex X to Directive 2000/60/EC is without prejudice to the application of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [7].
Vključitev snovi v Prilogo X k Direktivi 2000/60/ES ne posega v uporabo Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [7].
In order to improve coordination between Directive 2000/60/EC, Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency [8], and relevant sectoral legislation, potential synergies should be explored with a view to identifying possible areas where data gathered through implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC can be used to support REACH and other relevant substance evaluation procedures and, conversely, areas where data generated for the purpose of substance evaluations under REACH and relevant sectoral legislation can be used to support the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC, including the prioritisation outlined in Article 16(2) of that Directive.
Zaradi izboljšanja usklajevanja med Direktivo 2000/60/ES, Uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije [8] in ustrezno sektorsko zakonodajo bi bilo treba raziskati morebitne sinergije, da bi ugotovili, na katerih področjih bi bilo mogoče podatke, zbrane z izvajanjem Direktive 2000/60/ES, uporabiti v podporo REACH in drugim ustreznim postopkom evalvacije snovi ter na drugi strani področja, na katerih bi bilo mogoče podatke, zbrane z namenom evalvacij snovi v skladu z REACH in ustrezno sektorsko zakonodajo, uporabiti v podporo izvajanju Direktive 2000/60/ES, vključno s prednostno razvrstitvijo, opisano v členu 16(2) navedene direktive.
The progressive reduction of pollution from priority substances and the cessation or phasing-out of discharges, emissions and losses of priority hazardous substances, as required by Directive 2000/60/EC, may often be achieved most cost-effectively through Union substance-specific measures at source, for example pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) No 528/2012 [9] or Directives 2001/82/EC [10], 2001/83/EC [11] or 2010/75/EU [12].
Postopno zmanjšanje onesnaženosti s prednostnimi snovmi ter ustavitev ali postopno odpravo odvajanja, emisij in uhajanja prednostnih nevarnih snovi, kakor se zahteva v Direktivi 2000/60/ES, pogosto lahko najučinkoviteje dosežemo z ukrepi na ravni Unije za posamezne snovi pri izvoru, na primer na podlagi uredb (ES) št. 1907/2006, (ES) št. 1107/2009 in (EU) št. 528/2012 [9] ali direktiv 2001/82/ES [10], 2001/83/ES [11] ali 2010/75/EU [12].
Coherence between those legal acts, Directive 2000/60/EC and other relevant legislation should therefore be strengthened to ensure that source-control mechanisms are applied as appropriate.
Zato bi bilo treba bolje uskladiti navedene pravne akte, Direktivo 2000/60/ES in drugo ustrezno zakonodajo za zagotovitev ustrezne uporabe mehanizmov za nadzor pri viru.
Where the outcome of the regular review of Annex X to Directive 2000/60/EC, and available monitoring data, show that the measures in place at Union or Member State level are insufficient to achieve the EQS for certain priority substances or the cessation or phasing-out objective for certain priority hazardous substances, appropriate action should be taken at Union or Member State level with a view to achieving the objectives of Directive 2000/60/EC, taking into account the risk evaluations, socio-economic and cost-benefit analyses carried out under the relevant legislation as well as the availability of alternatives.
Kadar izid rednega pregleda Priloge X k Direktivi 2000/60/ES in razpoložljivi podatki o spremljanju pokažejo, da ukrepi, vzpostavljeni na ravni Unije ali države članice, ne zadoščajo, da bi se dosegli OSK za nekatere prednostne snovi ali da bi se ustavile oziroma postopno odpravile emisije nekaterih prednostnih nevarnih snovi, bi bilo treba na ravni Unije ali države članice sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za uresničitev ciljev Direktive 2000/60/ES, ob upoštevanju ocen tveganja, socialno-ekonomskih analiz ter analiz stroškov in koristi, opravljenih v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo, pa tudi morebitne druge možnosti.
Since the derivation of the EQS for the 33 priority substances included in Annex X to Directive 2000/60/EC, a number of risk assessments under Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances [13], later replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, have been concluded.
Od oblikovanja OSK za 33 prednostnih snovi iz Priloge X k Direktivi 2000/60/ES so bile izvedene številne ocene tveganj v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 z dne 23. marca 1993 o oceni in nadzoru tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo obstoječe snovi [13], ki jo je pozneje nadomestila Uredba (ES) št. 1907/2006.
In order to ensure an appropriate level of protection and to update EQS in line with the latest scientific and technical knowledge concerning risks to, or via, the aquatic environment, the EQS for some of the existing substances should be revised.
Da bi se zagotovila ustrezna raven varstva in posodobili OSK v skladu z najnovejšim znanstvenim in tehničnim znanjem glede tveganj za vodno okolje ali tveganj, ki se prenašajo po vodnem okolju, bi bilo treba OSK za nekatere obstoječe snovi pregledati.
Additional substances posing a significant risk to, or via, the aquatic environment at Union level have been identified and prioritised using the approaches specified in Article 16(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC and should be added to the list of priority substances.
Na ravni Unije so bile ugotovljene in v skladu s pristopi iz člena 16(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES prednostno razvrščene dodatne snovi, ki pomenijo znatno tveganje za vodno okolje ali tveganje, ki se prenaša po vodnem okolju, zato bi jih bilo treba dodati na seznam prednostnih snovi.
The latest available scientific and technical information has been taken into account in deriving the EQS for those substances.
Pri oblikovanju OSK za te snovi so bile upoštevane najnovejše razpoložljive znanstvene in tehnične informacije.
The contamination of water and soil with pharmaceutical residues is an emerging environmental concern.
Onesnaževanje voda in tal s farmacevtskimi ostanki postaja vse večji okoljski problem.
In evaluating and controlling the risk to, or via, the aquatic environment from medicinal products, adequate attention should be paid to Union environmental objectives.
Pri sedanjem ocenjevanju in nadzoru tveganja za vodno okolje ali tveganja, ki se prenaša po vodnem okolju, zaradi zdravil bi bilo treba nameniti ustrezno pozornost okoljskim ciljem Unije.
In order to address that concern, the Commission should study the risks of environmental effects from medicinal products and provide an analysis of the relevance and effectiveness of the current legislative framework in protecting the aquatic environment and human health via the aquatic environment.
Za obravnavo tega problema bi morala Komisija preučiti nevarnost okoljskih vplivov zdravil in oceniti ustreznost in učinkovitost veljavnega zakonodajnega okvira za varovanje vodnega okolja in zdravja ljudi prek vodnega okolja.
The derivation of EQS for priority hazardous substances usually involves higher levels of uncertainty than is the case for priority substances but such EQS still establish a benchmark to assess compliance with the objective of good surface water chemical status, as defined in Article 2(24) and points (ii) and (iii) of point (a) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Oblikovanje OSK za prednostne nevarne snovi je običajno povezano z večjo stopnjo negotovosti kot pri prednostnih snoveh, vendar so taki OSK še vedno merilo za oceno izpolnjevanja cilja dobrega kemijskega stanja površinske vode, kot je opredeljeno v členu 2(24) ter točkah (ii) in (iii) točke (a) člena 4(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
However, in order to ensure an adequate level of protection for the environment and human health, the cessation or phasing-out of discharges, emissions and losses of priority hazardous substances should also be aimed at, in accordance with point (iv) of point (a) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Toda zaradi zagotovitve ustrezne ravni varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi bi si bilo treba prizadevati tudi za ustavitev ali postopno odpravo odvajanja, emisij in uhajanja prednostnih nevarnih snovi v skladu s točko (iv) točke (a) člena 4(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
Scientific knowledge about the fate and effects of pollutants in water has evolved significantly over recent years.
Znanstveno znanje o usodi in vplivih onesnaževal v vodi se je v zadnjih letih zelo razvilo.
More is known about which compartment of the aquatic environment (water, sediment or biota, hereinafter ‘matrix’) a substance is likely to be found in, and therefore where its concentration is most likely to be measurable.
Več je znanega o tem, v katerem delu vodnega okolja (voda, usedlina ali organizmi, v nadaljnjem besedilu: medij) se snov najverjetneje nahaja, posledično pa tudi, kje je najverjetneje mogoče izmeriti njeno koncentracijo.
Some very hydrophobic substances accumulate in biota and are hardly detectable in water even using the most advanced analytical techniques.
V organizmih se kopičijo nekatere zelo hidrofobne snovi, ki so celo z najnaprednejšimi metodami analize v vodi komaj zaznavne.
For such substances, EQS should be set for biota.
Za take snovi bi bilo treba določiti OSK za organizme.
Nevertheless, in order to take advantage of their monitoring strategy and adapt it to their local circumstances, Member States should have flexibility to apply an EQS for an alternative matrix or, where relevant, an alternative biota taxon, for example sub-phylum Crustacea, paraphylum ‘fish’, class Cephalopoda or class Bivalvia (mussels and clams), provided that the level of protection afforded by the EQS and the monitoring system applied by the Member States is as good as that provided by the EQS and matrix laid down in this Directive.
Da pa bi lahko države članice koristno uporabile svoje strategije spremljanja in jih prilagodile svojim lokalnim razmeram, bi morale imeti vseeno možnost, da uporabijo OSK za drug medij ali, kadar je ustrezno, drug takson, na primer poddeblo raki, parafiletsko deblo ribe, razred glavonožci ali razred školjke, pod pogojem, da je raven varstva, ki ga zagotavljajo OSK in sistem spremljanja, ki ga uporabljajo države članice, enako visoka kot raven, ki jo zagotavljajo OSK in medij iz te direktive.
Novel monitoring methods such as passive sampling and other tools show promise for future application, and their development should therefore be pursued.
Nove metode spremljanja, kot so pasivno vzorčenje in druga orodja, so obetavne, zato bi jih bilo treba še naprej razvijati.
Commission Directive 2009/90/EC of 31 July 2009 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, technical specifications for chemical analysis and monitoring of water status [14], establishes minimum performance criteria for the analytical methods used in monitoring water status.
Direktiva Komisije 2009/90/ES z dne 31. julija 2009 o določitvi strokovnih zahtev za kemijsko analiziranje in spremljanje stanja voda v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES [14] določa minimalna izvedbena merila za analitske metode, ki se uporabljajo pri spremljanju stanja vode.
Those criteria ensure meaningful and relevant monitoring information by requiring the use of analytical methods that are sensitive enough to ensure that any exceedance of an EQS can be reliably detected and measured.
Ta merila zagotavljajo, da se s spremljanjem pridobijo smiselne in ustrezne informacije, saj se zahteva uporaba analitskih metod, ki so dovolj občutljive, da je mogoče zanesljivo zaznati in izmeriti vsako prekoračitev OSK.
Member States should be permitted to monitor in matrices or in biota taxa other than those specified by this Directive only if the analytical method used meets the minimum performance criteria set out in Article 4 of Directive 2009/90/EC for the relevant EQS and matrix or biota taxon, or performs at least as well as the method available for the EQS and matrix or biota taxon specified in this Directive.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti dovoljeno spremljanje v medijih ali taksonih, ki niso določeni v tej direktivi, samo, če uporabljena analitska metoda izpolnjuje minimalna izvedbena merila, določena v členu 4 Direktive 2009/90/ES za zadevni OSK in medij ali takson, oziroma če je vsaj tako dobra kot metoda, ki je na voljo za OSK in medij ali takson iz te direktive.
The implementation of this Directive involves challenges which include the diversity of the possible solutions to scientific, technical and practical questions and the incomplete development of monitoring methods, as well as constraints on human and financial resources.
Izvajanje te direktive zajema izzive, ki vključujejo raznolikost mogočih rešitev za znanstvena, tehnična in praktična vprašanja ter nedokončan razvoj metod spremljanja, pa tudi kadrovske in finančne omejitve.
To help address some of those challenges, the development of monitoring strategies and analytical methods should be supported by technical work by expert groups under the Common Implementation Strategy for Directive 2000/60/EC.
Da bi našli rešitve za nekatere od teh izzivov, bi bilo treba razvoj strategij spremljanja in analitskih metod podpreti s tehničnim sodelovanjem strokovnih skupin v okviru skupne strategije izvajanja za Direktivo 2000/60/ES.
Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances (PBTs) and other substances that behave like PBTs can be found for decades in the aquatic environment at levels posing a significant risk, even if extensive measures to reduce or eliminate emissions of such substances have already been taken.
Obstojne, bioakumulativne in strupene snovi (PBT) ter druge snovi, ki se obnašajo kot PBT, je še desetletja mogoče najti v vodnem okolju v količinah, ki pomenijo znatno tveganje, čeprav so bili že sprejeti obsežni ukrepi za zmanjšanje ali odpravo takih emisij.
Some are also capable of long-range transport and are largely ubiquitous in the environment.
Nekatere snovi se lahko prenašajo tudi na velike razdalje in so v okolju splošno prisotne.
Several such substances are among the existing and newly identified priority hazardous substances.
Številne take snovi se uvrščene med obstoječe in novo določene prednostne nevarne snovi.
For some of those substances there is evidence of long-term ubiquity in the aquatic environment at Union level, and those particular substances therefore need special consideration as regards their impact on the presentation of chemical status under Directive 2000/60/EC and as regards monitoring requirements.
Za nekatere od teh snovi obstajajo dokazi o dolgotrajni splošni prisotnosti v vodnem okolju na ravni Unije, zato bi bilo treba posebej preučiti učinek prav teh snovi na prikaz kemijskega stanja v skladu z Direktivo 2000/60/ES in zahteve za njihovo spremljanje.