natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reduction ground exploitation fee 74 – 67 × 4587 = EUR 32109. Reduction quality fee 74 – 67 × 3645 = EUR 25515.
Znižano nadomestilo za uporabo stavbnega zemljišča: 74 – 67 × 4587 = 32109 EUR. Znižano nadomestilo za uporabnost: 74 – 67 × 3645 = 25515 EUR.
Article 4.1 Ground exploitation/PPP agreement of 22 November 2004.
Člen 4(1) o uporabi stavbnega zemljišča/sporazum o JZP z dne 22. novembra 2004.
The Dutch authorities submitted their reply by letter of 7 December 2007.
Nizozemski organi so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 7. decembra 2007.
The Commission sent further requests for information to the Dutch authorities by letters of 25 April 2008, 12 September 2008, 14 August 2009, 12 February 2010 and 2 August 2011.
Komisija je z dopisi z dne 25. aprila 2008, 12. septembra 2008, 14. avgusta 2009, 12. februarja 2010 in 2. avgusta 2011 poslala nizozemskim organom nove zahtevke za informacije.
The Dutch authorities replied to these requests by letters of 30 May 2008, 7 November 2008, 30 October 2009, 12 April 2010, 29 September 2011 and 3 October 2011, respectively.
Ti so na nanje odgovorili z dopisi z dne 30. maja 2008, 7. novembra 2008, 30. oktobra 2009, 12. aprila 2010, 29. septembra 2011 in 3. oktobra 2011.
On 12 March 2010, a meeting took place between the Commission services and the Dutch authorities and, as a result, additional information was submitted to the Commission by letter of 30 August 2010.
Službe Komisije in nizozemski organi so 12. marca 2010 organizirali sestanek, na podlagi katerega so bile Komisiji z dopisom z dne 30. avgusta 2010 predložene dodatne informacije.
The prices for the land were laid down in Article 10 and Annex 3a of the 2004 Co-operation Agreement.
Cene zemljišč so bile določene v členu 10 in Prilogi 3a k sporazumu o sodelovanju iz leta 2004.
The 2004 Co-operation Agreement explicitly stated that these prices were minimum prices, which could be increased if more than the planned floor space was constructed.
V tem sporazumu iz leta 2004 je izrecno navedeno, da se te najnižje cene lahko zvišajo, če bi bila pozidana večja talna površina od načrtovane.
In return for this decrease in price, SJB was therefore willing to waive its right to invoke the 70 % clause contained in the 2004 Co-operation Agreement.
V zameno za to znižanje cene se je bilo partnerstvo SJB pripravljeno odpovedati svoji pravici do uveljavljanja klavzule o 70 % iz sporazuma o sodelovanju iz leta 2004.
SJB further proposed to contact an investor who would guarantee to buy the unsold housing units.
Poleg tega je partnerstvo SJB predlagalo, da bo poiskalo vlagatelja, ki bi zagotovil odkup neprodanih stanovanjskih enot.
This agreement amended the 2004 Co-operation Agreement, the SJB Project Agreement and the Municipality Project Agreement of 22 November 2004.
Ta sporazum je spremenil sporazum o sodelovanju iz leta 2004, sporazum o projektu s partnerstvom SJB in sporazum o projektu občine z dne 22. novembra 2004.
Article 2.1.2, first paragraph, of the Supplementary Agreement provides that, contrary to what was agreed to in the 2004 Co-operation Agreement, the price of the land on the Damplein to be sold to SJB would be EUR 4 million. Article 2.1.2, second paragraph, of the Supplementary Agreement provides that the previously agreed ground exploitation fee and quality fee were no longer due.
V prvem odstavku člena 2(1)(2) dopolnilnega sporazuma je navedeno, da cena zemljišča na Dampleinu, ki bo prodano partnerstvu SJB, v nasprotju s tem, kar je bilo dogovorjeno v sporazumu o sodelovanju iz leta 2004, znaša 4 milijone EUR. V drugem odstavku člena 2(1)(2) dopolnilnega sporazuma je navedeno, da predhodno dogovorjeni nadomestili za uporabo stavbnega zemljišča in za uporabnost nista več izterljivi.
The works should be finished by December 2011.
Dela bi se morala zaključiti do decembra 2011.
In case of late delivery, SJB was to reimburse part of the decreased price.
V primeru zamude bi moralo partnerstvo SJB nadomestiti del znižane cene.
Furthermore, the Dutch authorities informed the Commission that price decreases with regard to SJB were discussed within the PPP already in 2006 and 2008.
Poleg tega so nizozemski organi obvestili Komisijo, da se je znotraj JZP že v letih 2006 in 2008 razpravljalo o znižanju cen za partnerstvo SJB.
In 2006, the PPP apparently decided to lower the land sales price for the commercial premises due to the fact that less commercial space could be constructed than initially foreseen, whereas in 2008 the PPP apparently decided to grant SJB compensation for the delay in the delivery of the building permit.
Kot kaže, se je JZP leta 2006 odločilo znižati prodajno ceno zemljišč za poslovne prostore zaradi dejstva, da je bilo mogoče zgraditi manj od prvotno predvidenih poslovnih prostorov, medtem ko se je leta 2008 odločilo, da partnerstvu SJB odobri kompenzacijo za zamudo pri izdaji gradbenega dovoljenja.
The fact that SJB could no longer invoke the 70 % clause had an implication on the assumptions made in the initial valuation of the land in 2003 and the price agreed in the 2004 Co-operation Agreement.
Dejstvo, da partnerstvo SJB ni več moglo uveljavljati klavzule o 70 %, je vplivalo na predpostavke iz prvotne cenitve zemljišč leta 2003 in dogovorjeno ceno iz sporazuma o sodelovanju iz leta 2004.
According to the Dutch authorities, the decrease in the sales price for the land and the waiver of the fees was the consideration which the Municipality had to pay so that SJB would agree to waive its right to invoke the 70 % clause.
Glede na navedbe nizozemskih organov je znižanje prodajne cene zemljišča in opustitev nadomestil pomenilo kompenzacijo, ki jo je občina morala plačati, da bi se partnerstvo SJB odpovedalo svoji pravici do uveljavljanja klavzule o 70 %.
The Dutch authorities contend that SJB could not be forced to start construction works on the Damplein due to the 70 % clause in the 2004 Co-operation Agreement.
Nizozemski organi trdijo, da zaradi klavzule o 70 % iz sporazuma o sodelovanju iz leta 2004 partnerstva SJB ne bi bilo mogoče prisiliti k začetku izvajanja gradbenih del na Dampleinu.
By the time SJB received a valid building permit, the credit crisis had had its effect on the Dutch real estate market, which made it even more unlikely that SJB would swiftly pre-sell 70 % of the free sector housing units.
Do takrat, ko je partnerstvo SJB pridobilo veljavno gradbeno dovoljenje, so vplivi kreditne krize že dosegli nizozemski nepremičninski trg, zaradi česar je bilo še manj verjetno, da bo partnerstvo SJB hitro vnaprej prodalo 70 % stanovanjskih enot v profitnem sektorju.
The Dutch authorities stated that the set-up of the project by the Municipality has been transparent and described in the “Concept Masterplan Damcentrum”, approved on 6 April 2004.
Nizozemski organi so navedli, da je občina projekt, ki je opisan v Konceptu glavnega načrta Damcentrum, potrjenem 6. aprila 2004, zastavila pregledno.
Only financially sensitive agreements or parts thereof were kept confidential.
Razkriti niso bili le finančno občutljivi sporazumi ali deli sporazumov.
As explained in recital 23 above, the price of the land on the Damplein sold to SJB by the PPP was set at EUR 7,2 million, indexed annually at 2,5 % until payment, by the 2004 Co-operation Agreement.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (23), je bila s sporazumom o sodelovanju iz leta 2004 cena zemljišča na Dampleinu, ki ga je JZP prodalo partnerstvu SJB, določena na 7,2 milijona EUR, pri čemer je do plačila indeksirana z 2,5 % na leto.
This price was determined by an independent expert valuator.
Ceno je določil neodvisni cenilec.
Finally, the Commission notes that both the alleged reduction in 2006, which was said to be due to the fact that less commercial space could be realised than initially foreseen, and the alleged reduction in 2008, which apparently related to delays in the construction permit for SJB, were granted under the condition that SJB would receive a building permit by 1 October 2008.
Nazadnje Komisija opozarja, da sta bili domnevno znižanje iz leta 2006, ki naj bi bilo posledica dejstva, da bi bilo lahko realiziranih manj od prvotno predvidenih poslovnih prostorov, in domnevno znižanje iz leta 2008, ki je bilo očitno povezano z zamudami partnerstva SJB pri pridobivanju gradbenega dovoljenja, odobreni pod pogojem, da bi partnerstvo SJB pridobilo gradbeno dovoljenje do 1. oktobra 2008.
This condition was apparently not fulfilled since, according to the Dutch authorities, SJB received the building permit only in November 2008.
Ta pogoj očitno ni bil izpolnjen, saj je po navedbah nizozemskih organov partnerstvo SJB pridobilo gradbeno dovoljenje šele novembra 2008.
The aid was granted to SJB on 1 March 2010.
Pomoč je bila partnerstvu SJB dodeljena 1. marca 2010.
The aid to be recovered shall bear recovery interest for the period between 1 March 2010 until the date at which it will be effectively repaid.
Pomoč, ki jo je treba vrniti, vključuje obresti za obdobje od 1. marca 2010 do datuma dejanskega vračila –
The non-confidential version of these comments was forwarded to the Dutch authorities by letter of 16 May 2012.
Nizozemskim organom je bila z dopisom z dne 16. maja 2012 posredovana nezaupna različica teh pripomb.
By letter of 14 June 2012, the Dutch authorities submitted their reaction to the Stichting’s comments.
Z dopisom z dne 14. junija 2012 so se nizozemski organi odzvali na pripombe fundacije.
Council Implementing Decision 2013/248/CFSP
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2013/248/SZVP
implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus
o izvajanju Sklepa 2012/642/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Belorusiji
Having regard to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus [1], and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2012/642/SZVP z dne 15. oktobra 2012 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Belorusiji [1] in zlasti člena 6(1) Sklepa,
On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP.
Svet je 15. oktobra 2012 sprejel Sklep 2012/642/SZVP.
The Council considers that one person and two entities should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures as set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP.
Svet meni, da bi bilo treba eno osebo in dva subjekta črtati s seznama oseb in subjektov, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, iz Priloge k Sklepu 2012/642/SZVP.
The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be amended accordingly,
Zato bi bilo treba Prilogo k Sklepu 2012/642/SZVP ustrezno spremeniti –
The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is hereby amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Sklepu 2012/642/SZVP se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
The following person and entities are deleted from the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP:
S seznama iz Priloge k Sklepu 2012/642/SZVP se črtajo naslednja oseba in subjekta:
Person
1. oseba:
Entities
2. subjekta:
The Spirit and Vodka Company Aquadiv
The Spirit and Vodka Company Aquadiv;
Sport-Pari
Sport-Pari.
Shadryna, Hanna Stanislavauna
Shadryna, Hanna Stanislavauna;
amending Decision 2009/852/EC on transitional measures under Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 and (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regard the processing of non-compliant raw milk in certain milk processing establishments in Romania and the structural requirements of such establishments
o spremembi Odločbe 2009/852/ES o prehodnih ukrepih na podlagi uredb (ES) št. 852/2004 in (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede predelave surovega mleka, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev, v nekaterih obratih za predelavo mleka v Romuniji in strukturnih zahtev za take obrate
(notified under document C(2013) 2803)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 2803)
Commission Decision 2009/852/EC [2] allows that the requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004, Annex III, Section IX, Chapter I, Subchapters II and III, not apply to milk processing establishments in Romania listed in Annex II and Annex III to that Decision until 31 December 2013.
Odločba Komisije 2009/852/ES [2] omogoča, da se zahteve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004, Priloge III, oddelka IX, podpoglavij II in III poglavja I, ne uporabljajo za obrate za predelavo mleka v Romuniji, naštete v Prilogi II in Prilogi III k navedeni odločbi, do 31. decembra 2013.
According to Decision 2009/852/EC, certain milk-processing establishments listed in Annex II to that Decision may process non-compliant milk with separate production lines.
V skladu z Odločbo 2009/852/ES lahko nekateri obrati za predelavo mleka iz Priloge II k navedeni odločbi še naprej predelujejo mleko, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev, z ločenimi proizvodnimi linijami.
Romania sent the Commission a revised and updated list of those milk processing establishments on 15 February 2013.
Romunija je 15. februarja 2013 Komisiji poslala spremenjen in posodobljen seznam navedenih obratov za predelavo mleka.
In that revised and updated list, establishment number L35 SC DANONE PDPA ROMANIA SRL has been removed from Annex II and authorised to processing only compliant milk to be placed on the EU market.
Na navedenem spremenjenem in posodobljenem seznamu je bil obrat s številko L35 SC DANONE PDPA ROMANIA SRL umaknjen iz Priloge II in ima dovoljenje samo za predelavo mleka, ki izpolnjuje zahteve za dajanje na trg EU.
Establishment number MM 1795 SC CALITATEA SRL has been authorised to process compliant and non-compliant raw milk without separation and, consequently, it should be removed from Annex II and transferred to Annex III to the same Decision.
Obrat s številko MM 1795 SC CALITATEA SRL je dobil dovoljenje za predelavo surovega mleka, ki izpolnjuje zahteve, in takega, ki zahtev ne izpolnjuje, brez ločevanja in bi ga bilo zato treba odstraniti iz Priloge II in prenesti v Prilogo III k navedeni odločbi.
17 establishments currently listed in Annex III to Decision 2009/852/EC have been deleted as they are authorised to place dairy products on the intra-Union market, since they are using only compliant milk.
Izbrisanih je bilo 17 obratov, trenutno navedenih v Prilogi III k Odločbi 2009/852/ES, ker smejo dajati mlečne proizvode na trg znotraj Unije, saj uporabljajo samo mleko, ki izpolnjuje zahteve EU.
Those establishments were listed in the table in Annex III to Decision 2009/852/EC at No 1(AB 641 SC BIOMILK SRL); 6 (L78 SC ROMFULDA PROD SRL) 9 (BN 2399 SC CARMO-LACT PROD SRL) 13(L140 S.C. CARMOLACT SRL) 29 (CT 30 EASTERN EUROPEAN FOODS SRL) 40 (L124 SC PRIMULACT SRL, its name has been changed: SC LACTATE HARGHITA SA) 41(HR119 BOMILACT SRL) 42 (HR 625 LACTIS SRL) 43 (HR 213 PAULACT SA) 45 (IS 1540 PROMILCH SRL) 46 (L18 S.C. EUROCHEESE SRL) 56 (L121 SC MIRDATOD PROD SRL) 69 (SM 4189 PRIMALACT SRL) 70 (L5 SC NIRO SERV COM SRL) 74 (SV 1562 BUCOVINA SA SUCEAVA) 81 (L80 SC INDUSTRIAL MARIAN SRL) 82 (VN 231 VRANLACT SA).
Ti obrati so bili navedeni v preglednici v Prilogi III k Odločbi 2009/852/ES pod št. 1 (AB 641 SC BIOMILK SRL), št. 6 (L78 SC ROMFULDA PROD SRL), št. 9 (BN 2399 SC CARMO-LACT PROD SRL), št. 13 (L140 S.C. CARMOLACT SRL), št. 29 (CT 30 EASTERN EUROPEAN FOODS SRL), št. 40 (L124 SC PRIMULACT SRL – ime je spremenjeno v: SC LACTATE HARGHITA SA), št. 41 (HR 119 BOMILACT SRL)), št. 42 (HR 625 LACTIS SRL), št. 43 (HR 213 PAULACT SA), št. 45 (IS 1540 PROMILCH SRL), št. 46 (L18 S.C. EUROCHEESE SRL), št. 56 (L121 SC MIRDATOD PROD SRL), št. 69 (SM 4189 PRIMALACT SRL), št. 70 (L5 SC NIRO SERV COM SRL), št. 74 (SV 1562 BUCOVINA SA SUCEAVA), št. 81 (L80 SC INDUSTRIAL MARIAN SRL), št. 82 (VN 231 VRANLACT SA).
Moreover, 7 establishments currently listed in Annex III to Decision 2009/852/EC have been closed and, consequently, should be removed from the list.
Poleg tega je bilo 7 obratov, trenutno navedenih v Prilogi III k Odločbi 2009/852/ES, zaprtih in bi jih bilo zato treba črtati s seznama.
Those establishments were listed in the table in Annex III to Decision 2009/852/EC at N 26 (CT 225 MIH PROD SRL) 28 (CT 258 BINCO LACT SRL) 30 (CT 15 SC NIC COSTI TRADE SRL) 32 (L82 SC TOTALLACT GROUP SA) 33 (DJ80 SC DUVADI PROD COM SRL) 75 (SV 1888 SC TOCAR PROD SRL) 76 (SV 4909 SC ZADA PROD SRL).
Ti obrati so bili navedeni v preglednici v Prilogi III k Odločbi 2009/852/ES pod št. 26 (CT 225 MIH PROD SRL), št. 28 (CT 258 BINCO LACT SRL), št. 30 (CT 15 SC NIC COSTI TRADE SRL), št. 32 (L82 SC TOTALLACT GROUP SA), št. 33 (DJ 80 SC DUVADI PROD COM SRL), št. 75 (SV 1888 SC TOCAR PROD SRL), št. 76 (SV 4909 SC ZADA PROD SRL).
6 establishments in Romania asked to be listed for the first time in Annex III to Decision 2009/852/EC.
V Romuniji je 6 obratov prosilo, da bi bili prvič uvrščeni na seznam v Prilogi III k Odločbi 2009/852/ES.
Those establishments have been inserted in the list at number 8 (L 185 SC SIMCODRIN COM SRL) 17 (L 83 SC KAZAL SRL) 45 (L169 SC DOBREAN SRL) 46 (L152 AGROTRANSCOMEX SRL) 61 (L199 SC LACTO-BOROAIA SRL) 40 (L 189 SC CALITATEA SRL).
Navedeni obrati so bili vključeni na seznam pod št. 8 (L185 SC SIMCODRIN COM SRL), št. 17 (L83 SC KAZAL SRL), št. 45 (L169 SC DOBREAN SRL), št. 46 (L152 AGROTRANSCOMEX SRL), št. 61 (L199 SC LACTO-BOROAIA SRL), št. 40 (L189 SC CALITATEA SRL).
Decision 2009/852/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2009/852/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annexes II and III to Decision 2009/852/EC are replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Prilogi II in III k Odločbi 2009/852/ES se nadomestita z besedilom iz Priloge k temu sklepu.
Annexes II and III to Decision 2009/852/EC are replaced by the following:
Prilogi II in III k Odločbi 2009/852/ES se nadomestita z naslednjim besedilom:
L43 — SC LACTOCORV SRL, județul Constanța — its name has been changed in: SC DTM MILK LOGISTIC SRL
L43 – SC LACTOCORV SRL, judetul Constanta – ime je spremenjeno v: SC DTM MILK LOGISTIC SRL.
L 186 — SC BIG FAMILY SRL județul Teleorman — its name has been changed in: SC MADIS BIG COM SRL
L186 – SC BIG FAMILY SRL, judetul Teleorman – ime je spremenjeno v: SC MADIS BIG COM SRL.
establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for sanitary tapware
o določitvi okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka EU za okolje za sanitarne armature
(notified under document C(2013) 2826)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 2826)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the EU Ecolabel [1], and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 66/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o znaku EU za okolje [1], zlasti člena 8(2) Uredbe,
Under Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, the EU Ecolabel may be awarded to products which have a reduced environmental impact during their entire life cycle.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 66/2010 se lahko znak EU za okolje podeli proizvodom, ki imajo zmanjšan vpliv na okolje v svojem celotnem življenjskem krogu.
Since the consumption of water and the related energy to heat the water contribute significantly to the overall environmental impacts of households and non-domestic premises, it is appropriate to establish EU Ecolabel criteria for the product group of ‘sanitary tapware’.
Ker poraba vode in energije, potrebne za segrevanje vode, znatno prispeva k celotnemu vplivu gospodinjstev in nestanovanjskih prostorov na okolje, je primerno določiti merila za podelitev znaka EU za okolje za skupino proizvodov „sanitarne armature“.
The criteria should, in particular, promote water-efficient products which contribute to a reduction in the consumption of water and thereby also in the energy required for water heating.
Ta merila morajo zlasti spodbujati uporabo proizvodov za učinkovito rabo vode, ki prispevajo k zmanjšanju porabe vode in s tem tudi k zmanjšanju porabe energije, potrebne za segrevanje vode.
The product group ‘sanitary tapware’ shall comprise: household taps, showerheads and showers which are mainly used to derive water for personal hygiene, cleaning, cooking and drinking, including when they are marketed for non-domestic use.
Skupina proizvodov „sanitarne armature“ zajema: gospodinjske pipe ter pršne glave in prhe, namenjene predvsem za oskrbo z vodo za osebno higieno, čiščenje, kuhanje in pitje, vključno s tistimi, ki se tržijo za uporabo v nestanovanjskih prostorih.
The following products shall be excluded from the product group ‘sanitary tapware’:
Iz skupine proizvodov „sanitarne armature“ so izključeni naslednji proizvodi:
bathtub taps;
pipe za kopalne kadi;
double lever/handle showers;
dvovzvodne/dvoročne armature za prho;
non-domestic special purpose sanitary tapware.
posebne sanitarne armature za uporabo v nestanovanjskih prostorih.
‘tap’ means a directly or indirectly, mechanically and/or automatically operated valve from which water is drawn;
„pipa“ pomeni neposredno ali posredno, mehansko in/ali samodejno upravljane ventile za točenje vode;
‘showerhead’ means:
„pršna glava“ pomeni
a fixed overhead or side shower outlet, body jet shower outlet or similar device which may be adjustable, and which directs water from a supply system onto the user; or
fiksno nadglavno ali stransko prho, pršno šobo ali podobno nastavljivo napravo, ki usmerja vodo iz sistema za oskrbo z vodo proti uporabniku; ali
a moveable hand held shower outlet which is connected to a tap with a shower hose and can be hung directly on the tap or on the wall with the aid of an appropriate support;
premično ročno prho, ki je s pršno cevjo priključena na pipo in jo je mogoče obesiti neposredno na pipo ali steno s pomočjo ustrezne konzole;
‘shower’ means a combination of showerhead and interrelated control valves and/or devices packaged and sold as a kit;
„prha“ pomeni kombinacijo pršne glave in povezanih regulacijskih ventilov in/ali naprav, pakiranih in prodajanih v kompletu;
‘double lever/handle shower’ means a shower equipped with separate levers or handles for the control of the supply of cold and hot water;
„dvovzvodna/dvoročna armatura za prho“ pomeni prho, opremljeno z ločenimi ročicami ali ročaji za reguliranje oskrbe s hladno in toplo vodo;
‘electric shower’ means a shower equipped with a device to locally heat water for the shower using electrical power;
„električna prha“ pomeni prho, opremljeno z napravo za lokalno segrevanje vode za prho s pomočjo električne energije;
‘non-domestic special purpose sanitary tapware’ means sanitary tapware which requires unrestricted water flow in order to fulfil the intended non-domestic function;
„posebne sanitarne armature za uporabo v nestanovanjskih prostorih“ pomeni sanitarne armature, ki zahtevajo neomejen pretok vode za uporabo v nestanovanjskih prostorih;
‘water flow limiting device’ means a technical device limiting water flow to a given volume and allowing a higher water flow only where activated by the user for a chosen period of time within a single use;
„omejevalnik pretoka vode“ pomeni tehnično napravo, ki omeji pretok vode na določeno stopnjo in omogoča večji pretok vode samo, če ga uporabnik aktivira za določeno časovno obdobje pri eni uporabi;
‘maximum available water flow rate’ means the highest available water flow rate from the system or individual fitting;
„maksimalni pretok vode“ pomeni najvišji pretok vode, ki ga omogoča sistem ali posamezni del sistema;
‘lowest maximum available water flow rate’ means the lowest water flow rate from the system or individual fitting available at full opening of the valve;
„najnižji maksimalni pretok vode“ pomeni najnižji pretok vode, ki ga omogoča sistem ali posamezni del sistema pri popolnoma odprtem ventilu;
‘security technical feature’ means a device forming part of a sensor controlled sanitary tapware which is used to prevent continuous water flow by stopping the water supply after pre-set time even if there is a person or an object present within the sensor range.
„varnostna tehnična funkcija“ pomeni napravo, ki je del sanitarnih armatur s senzorskim upravljanjem in se uporablja za preprečevaje neprekinjenega pretoka vode tako, da prekine oskrbo z vodo po predhodno nastavljenem času, tudi če je na območju dosega senzorja oseba ali predmet.