natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These priorities cover different geographic regions or thematic areas in the field of electricity transmission and storage, gas transmission, storage and liquefied or compressed natural gas infrastructure, smart grids, electricity highways, carbon dioxide transport and oil infrastructure.
Te prednostne naloge zajemajo različne geografske regije ali tematska področja v zvezi s prenosom in shranjevanjem električne energije ter plina, infrastrukturo utekočinjenega ali stisnjenega naravnega plina, pametnimi omrežji, elektroenergetskimi avtocestami, prevozom ogljikovega dioksida in naftno infrastrukturo.
Projects of common interest should comply with common, transparent and objective criteria in view of their contribution to the energy policy objectives.
Projekti skupnega interesa bi morali biti skladni s skupnimi, preglednimi in objektivnimi merili v smislu njihovega prispevka k ciljem energetske politike.
For electricity and gas, in order to be eligible for inclusion in the second and subsequent Union lists, projects should be part of the latest available 10-year network development plan.
Pri električni energiji in plinu bi morali biti projekti vključeni v najnovejši razpoložljivi desetletni načrt za razvoj omrežja, da bi bili upravičeni do vključitve v drugi seznam in naslednje sezname Unije.
This plan should notably take account of the conclusions of the European Council of 4 February 2011 with regard to the need to integrate peripheral energy markets.
V tem načrtu bi morali biti upoštevani zlasti sklepi Evropskega sveta z dne 4. februarja 2011 v zvezi s potrebo po vključevanju obrobnih energetskih trgov.
Regional groups should be established for the purpose of proposing and reviewing projects of common interest, leading to the establishment of regional lists of projects of common interest.
Ustanoviti bi bilo treba regionalne skupine, ki bodo predlagale in pregledale projekte skupnega interesa, kar bo omogočilo sestavo regionalnih seznamov projektov skupnega interesa.
In order to ensure broad consensus, these regional groups should ensure close cooperation between Member States, national regulatory authorities, project promoters and relevant stakeholders.
Za zagotovitev splošnega soglasja bi morale te regionalne skupine poskrbeti za tesno sodelovanje med državami članicami, nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi, predlagatelji projekta in zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi.
The cooperation should rely as much as possible on existing regional cooperation structures of national regulatory authorities and TSOs and other structures established by the Member States and the Commission.
Sodelovanje bi moralo čim bolj temeljiti na obstoječih regionalnih strukturah sodelovanja med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in operaterji prenosnih sistemov ter drugih strukturah, ki jih vzpostavijo države članice in Komisija.
In the context of this cooperation, national regulatory authorities should, when necessary, advise the regional groups, inter alia on the feasibility of the regulatory aspects of proposed projects and on the feasibility of the proposed timetable for regulatory approval.
V okviru tega sodelovanja bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi po potrebi regionalnim skupinam svetovati med drugim o izvedljivosti regulativnih vidikov predlaganih projektov in o izvedljivosti predlaganega časovnega razporeda regulativne odobritve.
In order to ensure that the Union list of projects of common interest (‘Union list’) is limited to projects which contribute the most to the implementation of the strategic energy infrastructure priority corridors and areas, the power to adopt and review the Union list should be delegated to the Commission in accordance with Article 290 of the TFEU, while respecting the right of the Member States to approve projects of common interest related to their territory.
Da se zagotovi, da je seznam projektov skupnega interesa (v nadaljnjem besedilu: seznam Unije) na ravni Unije omejen na projekte, ki k izvajanju prednostnih koridorjev in območij strateške energetske infrastrukture prispevajo največ, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastila, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi s sprejemom in pregledom seznama Unije, pri čemer je treba spoštovati pravico držav članic, da same odobrijo projekte skupnega interesa, ki so povezani z njihovim ozemljem.
According to analysis carried out in the impact assessment accompanying the proposal that has led to this Regulation, the number of such projects is estimated at some 100 in the field of electricity and 50 in the field of gas.
V analizi, izvedeni v okviru ocene učinka, ki je priložena predlogu, ki je vodil k tej uredbi, je takih projektov na področju električne energije po ocenah približno 100, na področju plina pa približno 50.
Taking into account this estimate, and the need to ensure the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation, the total number of projects of common interest should remain manageable, and therefore should not significantly exceed 220.
Ob upoštevanju tega izračuna in potrebe po doseganju ciljev te uredbe bi moralo skupno število projektov skupnega interesa ostati obvladljivo in ne bi smelo bistveno preseči 220.
A new Union list should be established every two years.
Nov seznam Unije bi se moral pripraviti vsaki dve leti.
Projects of common interest that are completed or that no longer fulfil the relevant criteria and requirements as set out in this Regulation should not appear on the next Union list.
Projekti skupnega interesa, ki so dokončani ali ne izpolnjujejo več relevantnih meril in zahtev, določenih v uredbi, ne bi smeli biti uvrščeni na naslednji seznam Unije.
For that reason, existing projects of common interest that are to be included in the next Union list should be subject to the same selection process for the establishment of regional lists and for the establishment of the Union list as proposed projects; however, care should be taken to minimise the resulting administrative burden as much as possible, for example by using to the extent possible information submitted previously, and by taking account of the annual reports of the project promoters.
Zato bi morali biti obstoječi projekti skupnega interesa, ki bodo uvrščeni na naslednji seznam Unije, del istega izbirnega postopka za oblikovanje regionalnih seznamov in seznama Unije kot predlagani projekti; vendar bi bilo treba zagotoviti čim manjšo možno upravno obremenitev, na primer z uporabo predhodno posredovanih informacij v največji možni meri in z upoštevanjem letnih poročil predlagateljev projekta.
Projects of common interest should be implemented as quickly as possible and should be closely monitored and evaluated, while keeping the administrative burden for project promoters to a minimum.
Projekte skupnega interesa bi bilo treba izvesti čim prej ter jih skrbno spremljati in ocenjevati, pri čemer naj se ohrani nizka upravna obremenitev za predlagatelje projekta.
The Commission should nominate European coordinators for projects facing particular difficulties.
Komisija bi morala imenovati evropske koordinatorje za projekte, ki se soočajo s težavami.
Permit granting processes should neither lead to administrative burdens which are disproportionate to the size or complexity of a project, nor create barriers to the development of the trans-European networks and market access.
Procesi dovoljevanja ne bi smeli povzročiti nesorazmerne upravne obremenitve glede na velikost in zapletenost projekta ter ne smejo ovirati razvoja vseevropskih omrežij in dostopa do trga.
The conclusions of the Council of 19 February 2009 highlighted the need to identify and remove barriers to investment, including by means of streamlining of planning and consultation procedures.
V sklepih Sveta z dne 19. februarja 2009 je poudarjena potreba po določitvi in odpravi ovir za naložbe, tudi z racionalizacijo postopkov načrtovanja in posvetovanja.
Those conclusions were reinforced by the conclusions of the European Council of 4 February 2011 which again underlined the importance of streamlining and improving permit granting processes while respecting national competences.
Ti sklepi so dodatno potrjeni s sklepi Evropskega sveta z dne 4. februarja 2011, v katerih je znova poudarjena pomembnost poenostavitve in izboljšanja procesov dovoljevanja v skladu z nacionalnimi pristojnostmi.
The planning and implementation of Union projects of common interest in the areas of energy, transport and telecommunication infrastructure should be coordinated to generate synergies whenever to do so makes sense from an overall economic, technical, environmental or spatial planning point of view and with due regard to the relevant safety aspects.
Načrtovanje in izvajanje projektov Unije v skupnem interesu na področju energetske, prometne in telekomunikacijske infrastrukture bi moralo biti usklajeno, da bi ustvarjalo sinergije, kadar koli je to smiselno z ekonomskega, tehničnega, okoljskega ali prostorskega vidika, ob ustreznem upoštevanju varnostnih vidikov.
Thus, when the various European networks are being planned, preference could be given to integrating transport, communication and energy networks in order to ensure that as little land as possible is taken up, whilst ensuring, where possible, that existing or disused routes are reused, in order to reduce to a minimum any negative social, economic, environmental and financial impact.
Tako bi lahko pri načrtovanju različnih vseevropskih omrežij dali prednost povezovanju prometnih, komunikacijskih in energetskih omrežij, da bi zagotovili minimalno obremenitev prostora, pri tem pa je treba po možnosti zagotoviti ponovno uporabo obstoječih ali opuščenih poti, da bi se čim bolj zmanjšali negativni socialni, gospodarski, okoljski in finančni učinki.
Projects of common interest should be given ‘priority status’ at national level to ensure rapid administrative treatment.
Projekti skupnega interesa bi morali na nacionalni ravni imeti ustrezen „prednostni status“, da se jim zagotovi hitra upravna obravnava.
Projects of common interest should be considered by competent authorities as being in the public interest.
Projekte skupnega interesa bi morali pristojni organi obravnavati kot projekte javnega interesa.
Authorisation should be given to projects which have an adverse impact on the environment, for reasons of overriding public interest, when all the conditions under Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [13] and Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy [14] are met.
Projekti z negativnim vplivom na okolje bi lahko zaradi prevladujočega javnega interesa dobili dovoljenje, če so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst [13] ter Direktive 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike [14].
The establishment of a competent authority or authorities integrating or coordinating all permit granting processes (‘one-stop shop’) should reduce complexity, increase efficiency and transparency and help enhance cooperation among Member States.
Z vzpostavitvijo pristojnega organa ali organov, ki združujejo ali usklajujejo vse procese dovoljevanja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vse na enem mestu), bi se morala zmanjšati zapletenost, povečati učinkovitost in preglednost ter okrepiti sodelovanje med državami članicami.
Upon their designation, the competent authorities should be operational as soon as possible.
Pristojni organi bi morali biti operativni čim prej po njihovem imenovanju.
Despite the existence of established standards for the participation of the public in environmental decision-making procedures, additional measures are needed to ensure the highest possible standards of transparency and public participation for all relevant issues in the permit granting process for projects of common interest.
Kljub obstoju standardov za udeležbo javnosti v okoljskih postopkih odločanja je treba sprejeti dodatne ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovili najvišje možne standarde preglednosti in udeležbe javnosti pri vseh pomembnih zadevah v procesu dovoljevanja za projekte skupnega interesa.
The correct and coordinated implementation of Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment [15], of Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment [16], where applicable, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, signed in Aarhus on 25 June 1998 [17] (the ‘Aarhus Convention’), and of the Espoo Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context (the ‘Espoo Convention’) should ensure the harmonisation of the main principles for the assessment of environmental effects, including in a cross-border context.
Po potrebi bi moralo ustrezno in usklajeno izvajanje Direktive 2011/92/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje [15], Direktive 2001/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. junija 2001 o presoji vplivov nekaterih načrtov in programov na okolje [16], Konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah, podpisane v Aarhusu 25. junija 1998 [17] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Aarhuška konvencija), in Konvencije iz Espooja zagotoviti usklajenost glavnih načel presoje vplivov na okolje, tudi na čezmejni ravni.
Member States should coordinate their assessments for projects of common interest, and provide for joint assessments, where possible.
Države članice bi morale uskladiti svoje ocene za projekte skupnega interesa in po potrebi ocene izvesti skupaj.
Member States should be encouraged to exchange best practice and administrative capacity-building for permit granting processes.
Države članice bi bilo treba spodbujati k izmenjavi najboljših praks in k izgradnji upravnih zmogljivosti za procese dovoljevanja.
It is important to streamline and improve permit granting processes, while respecting — to the extent possible with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity — national competences and procedures for the construction of new infrastructure.
Pomembno je poenostaviti in izboljšati procese dovoljevanja, pri tem bi bilo treba v razpoložljivem obsegu z upoštevanjem načela subsidiarnosti spoštovati nacionalne pristojnosti in postopke za izgradnjo nove infrastrukture.
Given the urgency of developing energy infrastructures, the simplification of permit granting processes should be accompanied by a clear time-limit for the decision to be taken by the respective authorities regarding the construction of the project.
Glede na nujnost razvoja energetske infrastrukture bi bilo treba poleg poenostavitve procesov dovoljevanja določiti tudi natančen rok za sprejem odločitev ustreznih organov v zvezi z izvedbo projekta.
That time limit should stimulate a more efficient definition and handling of procedures, and should under no circumstances compromise the high standards for the protection of the environment and public participation.
Ta časovna omejitev bi morala spodbujati učinkovitejšo opredelitev in obravnavo postopkov in ne bi smela v nobenem primeru nižati visokih standardov varovanja okolja ter udeležbe javnosti.
With regard to the maximum time limits established by this Regulation, Member States could nevertheless strive to further shorten them if feasible.
Glede na maksimalne časovne omejitve, ki jih določa ta uredba, si lahko države članice kljub temu prizadevajo za njihovo nadaljnje skrajšanje, če je to izvedljivo.
The competent authorities should ensure compliance with the time limits, and Member States should endeavour to ensure that appeals challenging the substantive or procedural legality of a comprehensive decision are handled in the most efficient way possible.
Pristojni organi bi morali zagotoviti skladnost s časovnimi omejitvami in države članice bi si morale prizadevati za najučinkovitejšo možno obravnavo ugovorov zoper materialno ali postopkovno zakonitost celovite odločitve.
Where Member States consider it appropriate, they may include in the comprehensive decision decisions taken in the context of: negotiations with individual landowners to granting access to, ownership of, or a right to occupy property; spatial planning which determines the general land use of a defined region, includes other developments such as highways, railways, buildings and nature protection areas, and is not undertaken for the specific purpose of the planned project; granting of operational permits.
Če države članice menijo, da je ustrezno, lahko v celovito odločitev vključijo odločitve o: pogajanjih s posameznimi lastniki zemljišč o dovoljenju za dostop, lastništvu ali pravici do uporabe lastnine; prostorskem načrtovanju, ki določa namensko rabo zemljišč posameznega območja, vključuje druge razvojne vidike, kot so ceste, železnice, stavbe ter naravovarstvena območja, in ni namenjeno izključno za načrtovanje projekta; izdaji dovoljenj za uporabo.
In the context of the permit granting processes, a project of common interest could include related infrastructure to the extent that it is essential for the construction or functioning of the project.
V povezavi s procesi dovoljevanja bi lahko projekt skupnega interesa vključeval povezano infrastrukturo v obsegu, ki je nujen za izgradnjo ali delovanje projekta.
This Regulation, in particular the provisions on permit granting, public participation and the implementation of projects of common interest, should apply without prejudice to international and Union law, including provisions to protect the environment and human health, and provisions adopted under the Common Fisheries and Maritime Policy.
Ta uredba, zlasti določbe o dovoljevanju, udeležbi javnosti in izvajanju projektov skupnega interesa, bi se morala uporabljati brez poseganja v mednarodno pravo in pravo Unije, vključno z določbami o varovanju okolja in zdravja ljudi ter določbami iz skupne ribiške in pomorske politike.
The costs for the development, construction, operation and maintenance of projects of common interest should in general be fully borne by the users of the infrastructure.
Stroške razvoja, izgradnje, delovanja in vzdrževanja projektov skupnega interesa bi morali na splošno kriti uporabniki infrastrukture.
Projects of common interest should be eligible for cross-border cost allocation when an assessment of market demand or of the expected effects on the tariffs have indicated that costs cannot be expected to be recovered by the tariffs paid by the infrastructure users.
Projekti skupnega interesa bi morali biti upravičeni do čezmejne razporeditve stroškov, kadar ocena povpraševanja na trgu ali pričakovani učinki tarif nakazujejo, da stroškov ne bo mogoče kriti s tarifami, ki jih plačujejo uporabniki infrastrukture.
The basis for the discussion on the appropriate allocation of costs should be the analysis of the costs and benefits of an infrastructure project on the basis of a harmonised methodology for energy-system-wide analysis, in the framework of the 10-year network development plans prepared by the European Networks of Transmission System Operators under Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 and Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks [18], and reviewed by the Agency.
Podlaga za razpravo o ustrezni razporeditvi stroškov bi morala biti analiza stroškov in koristi infrastrukturnega projekta na podlagi usklajene metodologije analize energetskega sistema v okviru desetletnih načrtov za razvoj omrežij, ki jih pripravi Evropska mreža operaterjev prenosnih sistemov za električno energijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 714/2009 ter Uredbo (ES) št. 715/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o pogojih za dostop do prenosnih omrežij zemeljskega plina [18] in ki jih pregleda Agencija.
That analysis could take into consideration indicators and corresponding reference values for the comparison of unit investment costs.
Analiza bi lahko upoštevala kazalnike in ustrezne referenčne vrednosti za primerjavo stroškov naložbe na enoto.
In an increasingly integrated internal energy market, clear and transparent rules for cost allocation across borders are necessary in order to accelerate investment in cross-border infrastructure.
Na vedno bolj povezanem trgu so potrebna jasna in pregledna pravila čezmejne razporeditve stroškov za spodbujanje naložb v čezmejno infrastrukturo.
The European Council of 4 February 2011 recalled the importance of promoting a regulatory framework attractive to investment in networks, with tariffs set at levels consistent with financing needs and the appropriate cost allocation for cross-border investments, while enhancing competition and competitiveness and taking account of the impact on consumers.
Evropski svet je 4. februarja 2011 opozoril na pomen spodbujanja regulativnega okvira, ki spodbuja naložbe v omrežja, pri čemer je treba določiti višino tarif, skladno s finančnimi potrebami, ter ustrezno razporeditev stroškov pri čezmejnih naložbah, s čimer bi povečali konkurenco in konkurenčnost ter upoštevali vpliv na potrošnike.
When deciding on cross-border cost allocation, national regulatory authorities should ensure that its impact on national tariffs does not represent a disproportionate burden for consumers.
Pri odločanju o čezmejni razporeditvi stroškov bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi zagotoviti, da njen učinek na nacionalne tarife ne pomeni nesorazmerne obremenitve za potrošnike.
The national regulatory authorities should also avoid the risks of double support for projects by taking into account actual or estimated charges and revenues.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi se prav tako morali izogniti tveganju dvojne podpore za projekte ob upoštevanju dejanskih ali ocenjenih provizij in prihodkov.
Those charges and revenues should be taken into account only insofar as they are designed to cover the costs concerned and as much as possible related to the projects.
Te provizije in prihodki bi se morali upoštevati samo, v kolikor so namenjeni kritju zadevnih stroškov in so čim bolj povezani s projekti.
When an investment request takes into account benefits beyond the borders of the Member States concerned, the national regulatory authorities should consult the TSOs concerned on the project-specific cost-benefit analysis.
Če zahtevek za naložbo upošteva koristi izven meja zadevnih držav članic, bi se morali nacionalni regulativni organi posvetovati z zadevnimi operaterji prenosnega omrežja o analizi stroškov in koristi za določen projekt.
The existing internal energy market law requires that tariffs for access to gas and electricity networks provide appropriate incentives for investment.
Obstoječe pravo notranjega energetskega trga določa, da se ustrezne spodbude za naložbe zagotovijo s tarifami za dostop do plinskih in električnih omrežij.
When applying the internal energy market law, national regulatory authorities should ensure a stable and predictable regulatory framework with incentives for projects of common interest, including long-term incentives, that are commensurate with the level of specific risk of the project.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali pri uporabi prava notranjega energetskega trga zagotoviti stabilen in predvidljiv regulativni okvir s spodbudami za projekte skupnega interesa, vključno z dolgoročnimi spodbudami, sorazmernimi z ravnijo posebnega tveganja projekta.