natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To ensure matching between the normal value and the export price, the Commission ranged the diameter and length into three equal bands, as set out in the second disclosure letter of 5 July 2012:
Za zagotovitev ujemanja med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je Komisija razdelila premer in dolžino v tri enake skupine, kot navaja drugo pismo o razkritju z dne 5. julija 2012:
A small number of sales of the Indian producer fell outside these ranges and were not used to calculate the normal value.
Majhen obseg prodaje indijskega proizvajalca je bil zunaj teh razponov, zato ta prodaja ni bila uporabljena za izračun normalne vrednosti.
The screw described above would therefore be reported with the revised PCN ‘GSS’ = strength class 8.8; small diameter; small length.
Zgoraj opisani vijak bi bil zato naveden z revidirano kontrolno številko izdelka „GSS“ s trdnostnim razredom 8.8, majhnega premera in majhne dolžine.
It was clear from the example above that the product description text string does not include any information on the coating used by the Indian domestic producer.
Iz zgornjega primera je razvidno, da besedilni opis izdelka ne vključuje informacij o premazu, ki ga uporablja indijski domači proizvajalec.
The investigation file was therefore checked for any evidence of the type of coating, if any, used by the Indian producer for their sales of standard fasteners on their domestic market.
Spis o preiskavi je bil zato pregledan z vidika morebitnih dokazov glede vrste premaza, ki ga uporablja indijski proizvajalec pri prodaji standardnih pritrdilnih elementov na svojem domačem trgu.
Confidential evidence in the file, verified at the premises of the Indian producer, showed the use of electroplating (PCN type A) on standard fasteners on the domestic market and this was disclosed to all parties on 5 July 2012.
Zaupni dokazi v spisu, ki so bili preverjeni v prostorih indijskega proizvajalca, so pokazali uporabo galvanizacije (kontrolna številka izdelka vrste A) pri standardnih pritrdilnih elementih na domačem trgu, kar je bilo razkrito vsem stranem 5. julija 2012.
Comments to the information disclosure note of 11 July 2012
Pripombe k obvestilu o razkritju informacij z dne 11. julija 2012
Several exporting producers responded to the above disclosure.
Več proizvajalcev izvoznikov se je odzvalo na zgornje razkritje.
As requested by those exporting producers, a hearing, chaired by the Hearing Officer for Trade DG, was held to continue the dialogue with the Commission and discuss the points raised by them.
Na zahtevo navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je potekala obravnava, ki ji je predsedoval pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pri GD za trgovino, da se nadaljuje dialog s Komisijo in razprava o vprašanjih, ki so jih izpostavili.
In particular the exporting producers raised the following issues:
Proizvajalci izvozniki so izpostavili zlasti naslednja vprašanja:
the methodology by which the Indian producer had split its domestic sales into standard and special;
metodologija, v skladu s katero je indijski proizvajalec razdelil svojo domačo prodajo na standardno in posebno;
in the event that some fasteners sold to the automotive industry were considered as standard fasteners, an ‘important adjustment’ would be warranted;
v primeru, da bi bili nekateri pritrdilni elementi, ki se prodajajo avtomobilski industriji, obravnavani kot standardni pritrdilni elementi, bi bila zagotovljena „pomembna prilagoditev“;
adjustments to the normal value under Article 2(10)(b) for the indirect taxes incurred on the import of wire rod into India;
prilagoditve posrednih davkov na uvoz jekla za žice v Indijo normalni vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(10)(b);
the presence of Chrome VI in the coating of the standard fasteners;
prisotnost kroma VI v premazu standardnih pritrdilnih elementov;
the methodology followed by the Commission where there was no matching domestic sale for a particular export transaction; and
metodologija, ki jo je upoštevala Komisija, kadar za določeno izvozno transakcijo ni ujemajoče domače prodaje, ter
disclosure of the product codes of the Indian producer’s domestic sales.
razkritje oznak izdelkov domače prodaje indijskega proizvajalca.
In regard to point (a) above, the Indian producer split its domestic sales into standard and special by considering that fasteners manufactured to a customer drawing were special fasteners, whilst other sales are standard fasteners, i.e. not made to any specific or customer drawing.
Glede na točko (a) zgoraj je indijski proizvajalec razdelil svojo domačo prodajo na standardno in posebno, pri čemer je upošteval, da so pritrdilni elementi, izdelani po načrtu stranke, posebni pritrdilni elementi, vse druge pritrdilne elemente pa štejejo med standardne pritrdilne elemente, tj. niso izdelani glede na poseben načrt ali po načrtu stranke.
In regard to point (b) above and as mentioned in a note for the file dated 13 July 2012 sent to the said interested parties following the hearing held on 11 July 2012, the Commission confirmed that in the absence of the customer names as mentioned above, the Commission refers to recital 47 above.
Ob upoštevanju točke (b) zgoraj in navedbe v obvestilu k spisu z dne 13. julija 2012, ki je bilo poslano zainteresiranim stranem po obravnavi z dne 11. julija, je Komisija potrdila, da se ob odsotnosti imen strani, kot je navedeno zgoraj, Komisija sklicuje na uvodno izjavo 47 zgoraj.
In addition, the Commission notes that, according to the European association of fastener producers, ‘in Europe, when a Customer — particularly in the Automotive Sector — does order a fastener product manufactured in accordance with a drawing, but which is as well fully in accordance with international standards (ISO, EN, DIN, AFNOR, UNI), this product is in any case considered by the Fasteners Producer as “special” product and consequently identified — within the internal classification of the Company — as “special” ... this is the “modus operandi” of all of Fasteners Producers worldwide and also in India’.
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da v skladu z Evropskim združenjem proizvajalcev pritrdilnih elementov, „ko v Evropi stranka – zlasti v avtomobilskem sektorju – naroči pritrdilni element, ki je izdelan po načrtu in ki je tudi povsem v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi (ISO, EN, DIN, AFNOR UNI), ta izdelek s strani proizvajalcev pritrdilnih elementov v vsakem primeru šteje za ‚poseben‘ izdelek in je zato – po interni uvrstitvi družbe – opredeljen kot ‚poseben‘ … to je ‚modus operandi‘ vseh proizvajalcev pritrdilnih elementov po vsem svetu in tudi v Indiji“.
The Commission is thus confident that standard fasteners destined to the automotive industry were not included in the list of standard fasteners provided during the original investigation findings.
Komisija je zato prepričana, da standardni pritrdilni elementi, namenjeni za avtomobilsko industrijo, niso bili vključeni na seznam standardnih pritrdilnih elementov, ki je bil predložen v sklopu ugotovitev prvotne preiskave.
Therefore, this claim was rejected.
Zahtevek je bil zato zavrnjen.
In regard to point (c) above, in a hearing, exporting producers raised the issue of an adjustment under Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, to take account of the duties on importation of wire rod into India which are included in the normal value, but not on the export price from China.
Ob upoštevanju točke (c) zgoraj so proizvajalci izvozniki v obravnavi opozorili na vprašanje prilagoditve v skladu z členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe, da bi se upoštevale dajatve na uvoz jekla za žice v Indijo, ki so vključene v normalno vrednost, ne pa tudi na izvozno ceno iz Kitajske.
Chinese sampled companies during the original investigation purchased wire rod manufactured in China.
Vzorčene kitajske družbe so med prvotno preiskavo kupovale jeklo za žice, izdelano na Kitajskem.
The raw material imported by the Indian producer was subject to the basic customs duty (5 % of assessable value) and the Customs Education Cess (3 % of the basic customs duty value plus the CVD amount).
Na surovine, ki jih je uvozil indijski proizvajalec, sta bila obračunana osnovna carinska dajatev (5 % obdavčljive vrednosti) in davek na carinsko izobraževanje (3 % vrednosti osnovne carinske dajatve plus znesek izravnalne dajatve).
However, according to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, such an adjustment for indirect taxes is claimable if the import charges borne by the like product and by material physically incorporated therein, when intended for consumption on the domestic market would not be collected or would be refunded when the like product is exported to the European Union.
Vendar je v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe takšna prilagoditev za neposredne davke upravičena, če se uvozne dajatve za podoben izdelek in material, ki je fizično vključen v izdelku, kadar je ta namenjen za potrošnjo na domačem trgu, ne pobirajo ali se povrnejo, ko je podoben izdelek izvožen v Evropsko unijo.
In the absence of a claim and evidence that exports from the abovementioned exporting producers to the EU would benefit from a non-collection or refund of import charges on imports of raw materials (wire rod), the claim must be rejected.
Ker ni trditve in dokazov, da bi imel izvoz od zgoraj navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v EU koristi od nepobiranja ali povračila uvoznih dajatev na uvoz surovin (jeklo za žice), je treba zahtevek zavrniti.
Furthermore, such an adjustment is not normally available when the exporting producer concerned, as is the case in this review, sources all its raw materials from domestic suppliers incurring therefore no import charge.
Poleg tega takšna prilagoditev običajno ni na voljo, kadar zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik, tako kot v tem pregledu, pridobiva vse svoje surovine od domačih dobaviteljev, zaradi česar uvoznih dajatev ni.
In regard to point (d) above, evidence on the original investigation file showed that the standard coating on the standard fasteners sold on the Indian domestic market contained Chrome Cr3, and therefore this matched to the PCN definition of no Chrome VI added to the coating.
Ob upoštevanju točke (d) zgoraj so dokazi o spisu prvotne preiskave pokazali, da standardni premaz standardnih pritrdilnih elementov, ki se prodajajo na indijskem domačem trgu, vsebuje krom Cr3 in da je to zato v skladu z opredelitvijo kontrolne številke izdelka, da krom VI ni dodan v premaz.
Dumping margins were therefore recalculated taking the most expensive chrome coating type on the export side, without an export price adjustment.
Stopnje dampinga so bile zato ponovno izračunane, tako da je bila upoštevana najdražja vrsta premaza s kromom na strani izvoza brez prilagoditve izvozne cene.
Verified evidence was obtained during the verification in the course of the original investigation showing that all standard fasteners sold domestically in India were electroplated during the original IP.
Preverjeni dokazi, ki so bili pridobljeni s preveritvijo med prvotno preiskavo, kažejo, da so bili v prvotnem OP vsi doma v Indiji prodani standardni pritrdilni elementi galvanizirani.
In regard to point (e) above, it is confirmed that dumping margins were calculated on the basis that where there was no matching domestic sale, the export transaction would be excluded from the dumping calculation.
Ob upoštevanju točke (e) zgoraj je potrjeno, da so bile stopnje dampinga izračunane na podlagi dejstva, da se je takrat, ko ni bilo ujemajoče se domače prodaje, izvozna transakcija izključila iz izračuna dampinga.
Some parties argued that there was no basis to exclude certain export transactions in calculating the dumping margin.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da ni podlage za izključitev nekaterih izvoznih transakcij iz izračuna stopnje dampinga.
However, for all the sampled Chinese exporting producer significant matching between the domestic sales and exports sales was found so as to arrive at a fair representation of the sales made by the different parties.
Vendar je bilo pri vseh vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcih uvoznikih ugotovljeno precejšnje ujemanje med domačo prodajo in izvozom, da bi se zagotovilo pošteno zastopanje prodaje, ki jo izvedejo različne strani.
In regard to point (f) above, the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and a Chinese exporter claimed that the Indian producer did not give good cause for not allowing the Commission to disclose specific information regarding the product codes of its domestic sales.
Glede na točko (f) zgoraj sta kitajska trgovinska zbornica in kitajski izvoznik trdila, da indijski proizvajalec ni navedel tehtnega razloga, zakaj Komisiji ne dovoli razkrivanja posebnih informacij glede oznak izdelkov pri svoji domači prodaji.
The Commission provided as much information as possible, while respecting the confidentiality rules, through a number of notes for the file, information note made available to all interested parties and hearings granted to the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and to all Chinese exporters who requested them.
Komisija je predložila največji možen nabor informacij – pri čemer je spoštovala pravila zaupnosti – s številnimi obvestili za spis, obvestilom za vse zainteresirane strani ter zaslišanji, odobrenimi kitajski trgovinski zbornici in vsem kitajskim izvoznikom, ki so vložili zahtevek.
In regard to the request for disclosure of the Indian producer’s product codes, the disclosure of this information will allow the other parties to calculate with a reasonable accuracy the domestic prices of the Indian producer, which should be avoided on the ground of protection of business confidential information.
Glede zahtevka za razkritje oznak izdelkov indijskega proizvajalca bi razkritje teh informacij omogočilo drugim stranem, da z ustrezno točnostjo izračunajo domače cene indijskega proizvajalca, čemur se je treba izogniti na podlagi zaščite zaupnih poslovnih podatkov.
Failure to protect confidential information could leave the Commission to possible claims for damages and discourage companies in analogue countries whose cooperation is voluntary from cooperating in investigations.
Nezmožnost zaščite zaupnih podatkov bi lahko privedla do morebitnega vlaganja odškodninskih zahtevkov na Komisijo in odvračanja podjetij v primerljivih državah, katerih sodelovanje je prostovoljno, od sodelovanja v preiskavah.
This request was therefore rejected.
Ta zahtevek je bil zato zavrnjen.
Adjustments made to the methodology used in the definitive Regulation in the calculation of normal value
Prilagoditve metodologije, uporabljene v dokončni uredbi, pri izračunu normalne vrednosti
In view of the representations made by Chinese exporting producers in this review as to the definition of product types in the calculation of the normal value from India arguing that in addition to the distinction between standard vs special and strength class, the elements of diameter, length and the coating were important and the hearings and dialogue which ensued in the presence of the Hearing Officer, the data of the Indian producer was re-examined.
Ob upoštevanju pripomb kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v tem pregledu glede opredelitve vrste izdelka pri izračunu normalne vrednosti iz Indije, in sicer da so poleg razlike med standardnim in posebnim ter trdnostnim razredom pomembni elementi premer, dolžina in premaz, ter ob upoštevanju obravnav in dialoga v prisotnosti pooblaščenca za zaslišanje so bili podatki indijskega proizvajalca ponovno preiskani.
Following this re-examination, the Commission was able to identify the diameter and the length of the fasteners sold on the Indian domestic market.
Po tej ponovni preiskavi je Komisija ugotovila premer in dolžino pritrdilnih elementov, ki se prodajajo na indijskem domačem trgu.
To allow a fair comparison between these fasteners and those exported from the PRC, both the diameter and length were ranged and a normal value calculated for each range.
Da bi bila mogoča poštena primerjava teh pritrdilnih elementov s pritrdilnimi elementi, izvoženimi iz LRK, sta bila premer in dolžina razdeljena v razpone, za vsak razpon pa je bila izračunana normalna vrednost.
This was explained in detail in two information notes dated 5 and 11 July 2012 which were made available to all interested parties.
To je bilo podrobno razloženo v dveh obvestilih z dne 5. in 11. julija 2012, ki sta bila na voljo vsem zainteresiranim stranem.
By summarising into ranges to distinguish between the main product dimensions sold by the Indian producer, this methodology allowed for a fair comparison with the exports of the Chinese companies as requested by interested parties.
S povzemanjem v razpone za razlikovanje med dimenzijami glavnega izdelka, ki ga prodaja indijski proizvajalec, je ta metodologija omogočila pošteno primerjavo z izvozom kitajskih družb, kot so zahtevale zainteresirane strani.
Subsequently, two exporting producers argued that they did not have complete information, claiming that the classification was obscure and inappropriate and, therefore, did not have sufficient information to claim an adjustment for physical differences.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta nato trdila, da nimata celotnih informacij in da naj bi bila uvrstitev nejasna in neustrezna ter da zato nimata zadostnih informacij, da bi lahko zahtevala prilagoditev fizikalnih razlik.
However, beyond these general statements these two exporting producers did not provide any valid alternative suggestion nor substantive evidence.
Vendar pa poleg teh splošnih trditev proizvajalca izvoznika nista predložila nikakršnega veljavnega alternativnega predloga niti trdnih dokazov.
The claim was therefore dismissed.
Zahtevek je bil zato zavrnjen.
EFDA claimed that using diameter and length did not reflect reality and suggested an alternative which related the two criteria in order in their view to avoid leaving out some products, without however substantiating this alternative approach.
Združenje evropskih distributerjev (EFDA) je trdilo, da uporaba premera in dolžine ne odraža realnosti, in predlagalo alternativo, ki bi povezala ti dve merili, da bi se po njihovem mnenju preprečilo izpuščanje nekaterih izdelkov, vendar brez utemeljitve tega alternativnega pristopa.
The classification proposed by the Commission did not exclude any product types (all diameter and length possible combinations were covered) and thus this claim could not be further examined.
Uvrstitev, ki jo je predlagala Komisija, ni izključevala nobene vrste izdelkov (vključene so bile vse možne kombinacije premerov in dolžin), zato ta zahtevek ni bil nadalje preučevan.
All of the standard fasteners sold were found to be electroplated and so the normal value was calculated on a coating basis corresponding to the PCN code ‘A’.
Za vse prodajane standardne pritrdilne elemente je bilo ugotovljeno, da so galvanizirani in da je bilo mogoče izračunati normalno vrednost na podlagi premaza v skladu z oznako „A“ kontrolne številke izdelka.
Where a sampled Chinese exporting producer did not export fasteners with coating type A, the nearest coating type was used without any export price adjustment.
V primerih, ko vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik ni izvažal pritrdilnih elementov s premazom vrste A, je bila uporabljena najbližja vrsta premaza brez prilagoditve izvozne cene.
The strength class data, and the split between standard and special, remained unchanged.
Podatki o trdnostnem razredu ter delitev med standardnim in posebnim so ostali nespremenjeni.
Two exporting producers requested the intervention of the Hearing Officer for Trade DG to examine the confidential data of the Indian analogue producer and provide assurances regarding the confidential nature of its domestic sales, as well as on the question of coating of standard fasteners, the presence of chrome on coating and on the extraction of information regarding length and diameter for standard fasteners.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta zahtevala posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje pri GD za trgovino, da bi preučil zaupne podatke indijskega primerljivega proizvajalca in predložil zagotovila glede zaupne narave njegove domače prodaje, obravnaval vprašanje premaza standardnih pritrdilnih elementov in prisotnost kroma v premazu ter pridobivanje informacij o dolžini in premeru standardnih pritrdilnih elementov.
The Hearing Officer, after examining the confidential data of the Indian analogue producer clarified the questions posed by the two exporting producers.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje je po preučitvi zaupnih podatkov indijskega primerljivega proizvajalca pojasnil vprašanja, ki sta jih zastavila proizvajalca izvoznika.
The report of the Hearing Officer was placed in the file for inspection by interested parties.
Poročilo pooblaščenca za zaslišanje je bilo vstavljeno v spis za preučitev s strani zainteresiranih strani.
Despite the abovementioned additional information, clarifications, hearings and dialogue held, some parties continued to claim that they lacked information to allow them to make requests for adjustments to ensure a fair comparison.
Kljub zgoraj navedenim dodatnim informacijam, pojasnilom, obravnavam in dialogom so nekatere strani še naprej trdile, da nimajo zadostnih informacij, da bi lahko zahtevale prilagoditev, s čimer bi se zagotovila poštena primerjava.
The Commission provided extensive information to the parties on the product groups used in establishing normal value, as required by the Appellate Body [7].
Komisija je predložila stranem obširne informacije o skupinah izdelkov, uporabljenih pri opredelitvi normalne vrednosti, v skladu z zahtevo pritožbenega organa [7].
In addition, over an extended period of time running from 30 May until 19 July 2012, the Commission provided information and replied to all questions raised by all parties.
Poleg tega je v daljšem časovnem obdobju od 30. maja 2012 do 19. julija 2012 Komisija zagotavljala informacije in odgovorila na vsa vprašanja, ki so jih zastavile strani.
Furthermore, an additional period of 20 days was granted to all parties to comment on the final disclosure.
Nadalje je bilo vsem stranem zagotovljeno dodatno obdobje 20 dni za predložitev pripomb na končno razkritje.
The same parties argued that, contrary to the Appellate Body Report, the Commission refused to disclose information on the specific products of the Indian producer that were used in establishing the normal value without showing good cause.
Iste strani so trdile, da v nasprotju s poročilom pritožbenega organa Komisija ni želela razkriti informacij o posebnih izdelkih indijskega proizvajalca, uporabljenih pri opredelitvi normalne vrednosti, brez navedbe tehtnega razloga.
Article 6.5 of the ADA stipulates that information which is confidential or is provided on a confidential basis shall be treated as such by the investigating authorities.
Člen 6.5 Protidampinškega sporazuma (ADA) navaja, da morajo preiskovalni organi informacije, ki so zaupne narave ali pridobljene na zaupni osnovi, obravnavati kot takšne.
In this case, the Indian producer provided information on product types sold on the domestic market on a confidential basis and the company has renewed its request for confidential treatment addressed to the Commission, stating that it continues to consider that information as strictly confidential as referred to in recital 82.
V tem primeru je indijski proizvajalec predložil zaupne informacije o vrstah izdelkov, ki se prodajajo na domačem trgu, družba pa je ponovno vložila svoj zahtevek za zaupno obravnavo, ki ga je naslovila na Komisijo in v katerem navaja, da bo še naprej štela te informacije za strogo zaupne v skladu z uvodno izjavo 82.
These parties also claimed that the Commission failed to provide a meaningful non-confidential summary of the information provided by the Indian producer as required by the Reports.
Te strani so tudi trdile, da Komisija ni uspela predložiti smiselnega nezaupnega povzetka informacij, predloženih s strani indijskega proizvajalca, kot je zahtevano v poročilih.