natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EC) No 786/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 786/2007 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the amendment made by this Regulation to Regulation (EC) No 786/2007, it is appropriate to provide for a transitional period during which existing stocks may be used up.
Ker ni varnostnih razlogov, ki bi zahtevali takojšnjo uporabo spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 786/2007, uvedene s to uredbo, je ustrezno zagotoviti prehodno obdobje, v katerem se lahko porabijo obstoječe zaloge.
In column 2 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 786/2007 the words ‘ChemGen Corp., represented by Disproquima S.L.’ are replaced by ‘Eli Lilly and Company Ltd’.
V drugem stolpcu Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 786/2007 se besedna zveza „ChemGen Corp., ki jo predstavlja Disproquima S.L.“ nadomesti z „Eli Lilly and Company Ltd.“.
Existing stocks of the additive which are in conformity with the provisions applying before the date of entry into force of this Regulation may continue to be placed on the market and used until they are exhausted.
Obstoječe zaloge dodatka, ki so v skladu z določbami, ki so se uporabljale pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, se lahko še naprej dajejo na trg do porabe zalog.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 104/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 104/2013
amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 as regards the screening of passengers and persons other than passengers by Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) equipment in combination with Hand Held Metal Detection (HHMD) equipment
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 185/2010 glede varnostnega pregledovanja potnikov in oseb, ki niso potniki, z napravami za zaznavanje sledi eksplozivov (ETD) v kombinaciji z detektorji kovin za ročno uporabo (HHMD)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 [1], and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2008 o skupnih pravilih na področju varovanja civilnega letalstva in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002 [1] in zlasti člena 4(3) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 of 2 April 2009 supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security laid down in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] provides that the implementing rules to be adopted pursuant to Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 may allow the use of explosive trace detection (ETD) equipment and hand held metal detection (HHMD) equipment for screening of persons (passengers and persons other than passengers).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 272/2009 z dne 2. aprila 2009 o dopolnitvi skupnih osnovnih standardov na področju varovanja v civilnem letalstvu iz Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 300/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] določa, da lahko izvedbeni ukrepi, ki se sprejmejo v skladu s členom 4(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008, pri varnostnem pregledu potnikov in oseb, ki niso potniki, dovoljujejo uporabo naprav za zaznavanje sledi eksplozivov (ETD) in detektorjev kovin za ročno uporabo (HHMD).
Experience has shown that hand searches of passengers and persons other than passengers are not always the most efficient means of screening certain parts of the person, in particular where those parts are not readily accessible such as certain headgear, plaster casts or prosthesis.
Po izkušnjah sodeč ročni pregledi potnikov in oseb, ki niso potniki, niso vedno najbolj učinkovit način za pregledovanje nekaterih delov osebe, zlasti če ti deli niso lahko dostopni, kot so nekatera naglavna pokrivala, mavčni povoji ali proteze.
Trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of the combined use of ETD and HHMD in such cases.
V preskusih je bilo dokazano, da je kombinirana uporaba ETD in HHMD v takih primerih učinkovita.
Moreover, the use of ETD and HHMD may facilitate the screening process and be experienced to be a less intrusive means of screening than a hand search, thus constituting an improvement in the experience of persons screened.
Poleg tega lahko uporaba ETD in HHMD olajša postopek preverjanja in je po izkušnjah sodeč manj vsiljiv način pregleda kot ročna preiskava, zaradi česar imajo pregledane osebe boljše izkušnje z njimi.
It is thus useful and justified to allow these methods for screening of those parts of the person where a hand search is considered inefficient and/or undesirable such as certain headgear, plaster casts or prosthesis.
Zato je koristno in upravičeno, da se navedene metode dovolijo za pregledovanje tistih delov osebe, pri katerih se ročna preiskava šteje za neučinkovito in/ali nezaželeno, kot so nekatera naglavna pokrivala, mavčni povoji ali proteze.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably the human dignity, the freedom of religion, the non-discrimination, the rights of persons with disabilities, and the right to liberty and security.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznava Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti človeško dostojanstvo, svobodo veroizpovedi, nediskriminacijo, pravice invalidnih oseb ter pravico do svobode in varnosti.
In so far as it limits those rights and principles, such limitation is made genuinely to meet objectives of general interest and the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others, respecting the conditions laid down in Article 52 of the Charter.
Če navedene pravice in načela omejuje, jih omejuje izključno zaradi doseganja ciljev splošnega interesa ter potrebe po zaščiti pravic in svoboščin drugih, pri čemer spoštuje pogoje iz člena 52 Listine.
This Regulation must be applied in accordance with those rights and principles.
To uredbo je treba uporabljati v skladu z navedenimi pravicami in načeli.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 [3] should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 185/2010 [3] bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
letter (f) is added to point 1.3.1.1 as follows:
točka (f) se doda točki 1.3.1.1, kot sledi:
explosive trace detection (ETD) equipment combined with hand held metal detection (HHMD) equipment.’;
naprave za zaznavanje sledi eksplozivov (ETD) v kombinaciji z detektorji kovin za ročno uporabo (HHMD).“;
point 1.3.1.2 is replaced by the following:
točka 1.3.1.2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Points 4.1.1.3 – 4.1.1.6 and 4.1.1.10 – 4.1.1.11 shall apply to the screening of persons other than passengers.’;
Za varnostni pregled oseb, ki niso potniki, se uporabljajo točke 4.1.1.3–4.1.1.6 in 4.1.1.10–4.1.1.11.“;
letter (e) is added to point 4.1.1.2 as follows:
točka (e) se doda točki 4.1.1.2, kot sledi:
new point 4.1.1.11 with the following wording is added:
doda se nova točka 4.1.1.11 z naslednjim besedilom:
Explosive trace detection (ETD) equipment in combination with hand held metal detection (HHMD) equipment may only be used in cases where the screener considers a hand search of a given part of the person to be inefficient and/or undesirable.’.
Naprave za zaznavanje sledi eksplozivov (ETD) v kombinaciji z detektorjem kovin za ročno uporabo (HHMD) se lahko uporabljajo samo, če pregledovalec meni, da je ročna preiskava določenega dela osebe neučinkovita in/ali nezaželena.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 105/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 105/2013
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 as regards the name of the holder of the authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 371/2011 glede imena imetnika dovoljenja za natrijev dimetilglicin
Taminco N.V. has submitted an application under Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 proposing to change the name of the holder of the authorisation as regards Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 [2] concerning the 10 year authorisation of dimethylglycine sodium salt, belonging to the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’ and to the functional group ‘other zootechnical additives’.
Družba Taminco N.V. je v skladu s členom 13(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 vložila vlogo s predlogom za spremembo imena imetnika dovoljenja iz Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 371/2011 [2] o izdaji dovoljenja za natrijev dimetilglicin, ki spada v kategorijo dodatkov „zootehnični dodatki“ in funkcionalno skupino „drugi zootehnični dodatki“, za deset let.
To allow the applicant to exploit its marketing rights under the name of Taminco BVBA it is necessary to change the terms of the authorisation.
Da bi se vlagatelju omogočilo, da izkorišča svoje pravice trženja pod imenom Taminco BVBA, je treba spremeniti pogoje dovoljenja.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 371/2011 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the amendment made by this Regulation to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011, it is appropriate to provide for a transitional period during which existing stocks may be used up.
Ker ni varnostnih razlogov, ki bi zahtevali takojšnjo uporabo spremembe Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 371/2011, uvedene s to uredbo, je ustrezno zagotoviti prehodno obdobje, v katerem se lahko porabijo obstoječe zaloge.
In column 2 of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 371/2011 the words ‘Taminco N.V.’ are replaced by ‘Taminco BVBA’.
V drugem stolpcu Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 371/2011 se besedna zveza „Taminco N.V.“ nadomesti s „Taminco BVBA“.
Existing stocks of the additive which are in conformity with the provisions applying before the date of entry into force of this Regulation may continue to be placed on the market and used until they are exhausted.
Obstoječe zaloge dodatka, ki so v skladu z določbami, ki so se uporabljale pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, se lahko še naprej dajejo na trg in uporabljajo do porabe zalog.
The applicant claims that it transformed its legal form into a private limited liability company with effect from 1 October 2012.
Vlagatelj trdi, da je s 1. oktobrom 2012 spremenil svojo pravno obliko v zasebno družbo z omejeno odgovornostjo.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 106/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 106/2013
Commission Regulation (EU) No 107/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 107/2013
of 5 February 2013
z dne 5. februarja 2013
amending Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum levels for melamine in canned pet food
o spremembi Priloge I k Direktivi 2002/32/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede mejnih vrednosti melamina v konzervirani hrani za hišne živali
Information has been provided that melamine is used in the coating of cans containing pet food and can migrate into that pet food.
Predložene so bile informacije, da se melamin uporablja za premaze pločevink, ki vsebujejo hrano za hišne živali, in da tako lahko preide v hrano za hišne živali.
Cans with the same coating are used for the canning of food and in accordance with the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) a scientific opinion on melamine in food and feed [2], a specific migration limit (SML) of 2,5 mg/kg for the canned food as such has been established by Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 of 14 January 2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food [3] as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1282/2011 [4].
Pločevinke z istim premazom se uporabljajo za konzerviranje živil in v skladu z znanstvenim mnenjem Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) o melaminu v živilih in krmi [2] je bila z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 10/2011 z dne 14. januarja 2011 o polimernih materialih in izdelkih, namenjenih za stik z živili [3], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (EU) št. 1282/2011 [4], za konzervirana živila določena mejna vrednost specifične migracije (SML) 2,5 mg/kg.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission has established maximum levels for melamine in feed and food [5] which are to apply to feed as sold, while the maximum levels established in Directive 2002/32/EC concern feed with a moisture content of 12 %.
Komisija za Codex Alimentarius je določila mejne vrednosti melamina v krmi in živilih [5], ki se uporabljajo za krmo, kakršna se prodaja, medtem ko se mejne vrednosti iz Direktive 2002/32/ES nanašajo na krmo z 12-odstotno vsebnostjo vlage.
Recently provided information has demonstrated that melamine can migrate in wet pet food from the can coating at a level above 2,5 mg/kg relative to a feed with a moisture content of 12 % but below the SML of 2,5 mg/kg in the wet pet food.
Iz pred kratkim predloženih informacij je razvidno, da lahko v mokro hrano za hišne živali iz premaza pločevinke preide več kot 2,5 mg/kg melamina pri krmi z 12-odstotno vsebnostjo vlage, vrednost v mokri hrani za hišne živali pa je nižja od mejne vrednosti specifične migracije 2,5 mg/kg.
In the light of this development in scientific and technical knowledge, it is appropriate to establish the maximum level of 2,5 mg/kg for melamine for canned wet pet food on a ‘as sold’ basis and this in line with what is foreseen for canned food.
Glede na razvoj znanstvenega in tehničnega znanja je primerno, da se določi mejna vrednost 2,5 mg/kg melamina za konzervirano mokro hrano za hišne živali, „kakršna se prodaja“, kar je v skladu s tem, kar je predvideno za konzervirano hrano.
Directive 2002/32/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 2002/32/ES bi zato bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Direktivi 2002/32/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 5 February 2013.
V Bruslju, 5. februarja 2013
Available online: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/1573.pdf
Na voljo na spletu: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/1573.pdf.
Row 7 of Section I of Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC is replaced by the following:
Vrstica 7 oddelka I Priloge I k Direktivi 2002/32/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Feed
Krma,
canned pet food
konzervirane hrane za hišne živali,
the following feed additives:
naslednjih krmnih dodatkov:
guanidino acetic acid (GAA);
gvanidin ocetne kisline,
urea;
sečnine,
The maximum level is applicable to canned pet food as sold.’
Mejna vrednost se uporablja za konzervirano hrano za hišne živali, kakršna se prodaja.“
[145 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1573.
[145 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1573.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 108/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 108/2013
Commission Regulation (EU) No 109/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 109/2013
amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator also taking into consideration the expansion of the Union emission trading scheme to EEA-EFTA countries
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 748/2009 o seznamu operaterjev zrakoplovov, ki so 1. januarja 2006 ali pozneje izvajali letalsko dejavnost s seznama v Prilogi I k Direktivi 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, z navedbo države članice upravljavke za vsakega operaterja zrakoplova ob upoštevanju razširitve sistema Unije za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije na države EGP-Efta
Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC [1], and in particular Article 18a(3)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. oktobra 2003 o vzpostavitvi sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti in o spremembi Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES [1], zlasti člena 18a(3)(b) Direktive,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 [3] establishes a list of aircraft operators which had performed an aviation activity as defined in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 748/2009 [3] določa seznam operaterjev zrakoplovov, ki so 1. januarja 2006 ali pozneje izvajali letalsko dejavnost v smislu Priloge I k Direktivi 2003/87/ES.
That list aims to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators by providing information on which Member State will be regulating a particular aircraft operator.
Namen seznama je zmanjšati upravno breme za operaterje zrakoplovov z navedbo države članice upravljavke posameznega operaterja zrakoplova.
The inclusion in the Union’s emissions trading scheme is dependent upon the performance of an aviation activity as set out in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC and is not dependent on the inclusion in the list of aircraft operators established by the Commission on the basis of Article 18a(3) of that Directive.
Vključitev v sistem Unije za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije je odvisna od izvajanja letalske dejavnosti iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2003/87/ES in ne od vključenosti na seznam operaterjev zrakoplovov, ki ga je Komisija sestavila na podlagi člena 18a(3) navedene direktive.
The expansion of the aviation provisions of the Union emission trading scheme to EEA-EFTA countries and the criteria set under Article 18a(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC to determine aircraft operator’s administering Member State imply that certain aircraft operators should be administered by EEA-EFTA countries.
Razširitev letalskih določb sistema Unije za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije na države članice EGP-Efta in merila iz člena 18a(1) Direktive 2003/87/ES za določitev države članice upravljavke operaterja zrakoplova pomenijo, da bi določene operaterje zrakoplovov morale upravljati države članice EGP-Efta.
Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 748/2009 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
List of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator also taking into consideration the expansion of the Union emission trading scheme to EEA-EFTA countries
Seznam operaterjev zrakoplovov, ki so 1. januarja 2006 ali pozneje izvajali letalsko dejavnost s seznama v Prilogi I k Direktivi 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, z navedbo države članice upravljavke za vsakega operaterja zrakoplova ob upoštevanju razširitve sistema Unije za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije na države EGP-Efta
TANZANIA, UNITED REPUBLIC OF
ZDRUŽENA REPUBLIKA TANZANIJA
LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
LAOŠKA LJUDSKA DEMOKRATIČNA REPUBLIKA
MACEDONIA, THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF
NEKDANJA JUGOSLOVANSKA REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA
MACAO SAR
MACAU
Federal State Unitary Enterprise ‘State Transport Company ‘Russia‘
Federal State Unitary Enterprise „State Transport Company „Russia“
VENEZUELA, BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF
BOLIVARSKA REPUBLIKA VENEZUELA
PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, OCCUPIED
ZASEDENO PALESTINSKO OZEMLJE
KAZAKHSTAN, KYRGYZSTAN
KAZAHSTAN, KIRGIZISTAN
KOREA, DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
DEMOKRATIČNA LJUDSKA REPUBLIKA KOREJA
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
DRŽAVA BRUNEJ
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 110/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 110/2013
of 6 February 2013
z dne 6. februarja 2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Gruyère (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Gruyère (ZGO))
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular Article 52(3)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. novembra 2012 o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil [1] in zlasti člena 52(3)(b) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs [2], France’s application to register the name ‘Gruyère’ as a protected geographical indication (PGI) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Vloga Francije za registracijo imena „Gruyère“ kot zaščitene geografske označbe (ZGO) je bila v skladu s členom 6(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila [2] objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
Australia, New Zealand and the US Dairy Export Council together with the National Milk Producers Federation of the United States submitted objections to the registration pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Avstralija in Nova Zelandija ter ameriški svet za izvoz mlečnih izdelkov (U.S. Dairy Export Council) skupaj z nacionalnim združenjem proizvajalcev mleka (National Milk Producers Federation) so v skladu s členom 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 tej registraciji ugovarjali.
These objections were deemed admissible under Article 7(3) of that Regulation.
Ti ugovori so se na podlagi člena 7(3) navedene uredbe šteli za dopustne.
The objections concerned non-compliance with the conditions laid down in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, in particular as regards the fact that the name does not refer to a geographical area.
Izjave o ugovoru so se nanašale na nespoštovanje pogojev iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, zlasti na dejstvo, da se ime ne sklicuje na geografsko območje.
The generic nature of the name and the harm caused to names, trademarks and products that have been legally on the market for at least five years preceding the date of publication provided for in Article 6(2) were also invoked.
Poleg tega sta se omenjali generičnost imena in škoda, povzročena imenom, znamkam ali proizvodom, ki so se zakonito tržili že vsaj pet let pred datumom objave, ki jo določa člen 6(2).
The objections further claimed that registration of the name in question would be contrary to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
V izjavah o ugovoru je bilo še navedeno, da registracija zadevnega imena ne bi bila v skladu z določbami člena 3(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
By letters of 23 May 2011, the Commission asked France and the objectors to seek agreement among themselves.
Komisija je Francijo in stranke, ki so nasprotovale registraciji, s pismi z dne 23. maja 2011 pozvala k iskanju medsebojnega dogovora.
Given that no agreement was reached within the designated timeframe, the Commission should adopt a decision.
Ker v določenem roku dogovor ni bil dosežen, bi morala Komisija sprejeti sklep.
Concerning the alleged failure of the name ‘Gruyère’ to comply with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, it should be noted that this name is a traditional name within the meaning of Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and may therefore be registered.
V zvezi s trditvijo o domnevni neskladnosti imena „Gruyère“ s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 bi bilo treba poudariti, da gre pri tem imenu za tradicionalno ime v smislu člena 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 in se torej lahko registrira.
The objectors submitted several pieces of evidence that show, according to them, that the name in question is generic.
Vlagatelji ugovora so izpostavili več značilnosti, ki po njihovem mnenju kažejo, da je zadevno ime generično.
It is, however, clear that the inclusion of a term given in Annex B to the Stresa Convention of 1951 does not imply that the said term has become ipso facto generic.
Vendar je očitno, da vključitev nekega izraza v Prilogo B h konvenciji iz Strese iz leta 1951 ne pomeni, da je zaradi tega ta izraz postal generičen.