natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Agrees with the Commission that ‘[t]he increasing integration of international markets and the economic globalisation also affects the effectiveness of national tax systems’ [16] and that ‘[a]ddressing this problem requires joint efforts by both developing and developed countries to implement the principles of good governance in the tax area, thereby also enhancing growth prospects and poverty reduction in developing countries while strengthening tax systems at global level’ [17];
se strinja s Komisijo, da na „učinkovitost nacionalnih davčnih sistemov vplivata tudi vse večje povezovanje mednarodnih trgov in ekonomska globalizacija“ [16] in da so za „reševanje te težave […] potrebna skupna prizadevanja držav v razvoju in razvitih držav pri izvajanju načel dobrega upravljanja na davčnem področju, s čimer bi se povečale tudi možnosti za rast in zmanjšala revščina v državah v razvoju, hkrati pa bi se krepili davčni sistemi po vsem svetu“ [17];
Stresses that parts of illicit financial flows are done through the mispricing of trade transactions which consists of overpricing imports and underpricing exports on customs documents;
poudarja, da k delu nezakonitih finančnih tokov prispeva nepošteno oblikovanje cen trgovinskih transakcij, ki vključuje navajanje previsokih uvoznih cen in prenizkih izvoznih cen v carinskih dokumentih;
emphasises the important role played by the customs authorities in detecting fraudulent transactions as they are the ones who are present at points of entry and exit of goods;
poudarja pomembno vlogo carinskih organov pri odkrivanju goljufivih transakcij, saj so ti organi navzoči na vstopnih in izstopnih mestih za blago;
points out that the illicit practices are possible in the absence of efficient national customs supervision;
poudarja, da se nezakonite prakse lahko pojavijo, če ni vzpostavljen učinkovit nacionalni carinski nadzor;
Notes that the customs authorities in many developing countries are not functioning effectively, principally due to absence of efficient risk management systems;
ugotavlja, da carinski organi v mnogih državah v razvoju ne delujejo učinkovito, zlasti ker ni učinkovitih sistemov za obvladovanje tveganja;
calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to this aspect of development and to concentrate its resources on remedying this situation, especially by including sustainable reforms of customs systems in the public financial management criteria for granting budget support;
poziva Komisijo, naj nameni posebno pozornost temu vidiku razvoja in osredotoči svoja sredstva na odpravo teh razmer, zlasti z vključevanjem vzdržnih reform carinskih sistemov v merila za odobritev proračunske podpore, ki se uporabljajo pri upravljanju javnih financ;
Emphasises the fact that inefficient customs control is not exclusive to developing countries;
poudarja, da neučinkovit carinski nadzor ni značilen le za države v razvoju;
deplores that control of customs in Member States is not functioning properly [18], thus allowing for fraudulent behaviour;
obžaluje, da carinski nadzor v državah članicah ne deluje ustrezno [18] in tako dopušča goljufije;
urges the Commission to take all necessary steps in order to remedy the situation by strengthening its cooperation with international networks such as the Economic Crime Agency Network and national customs authorities in order to gather evidence from manufacturers, shipping lines, logistics companies and port authorities all over the world;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi odpravila težave in okrepila sodelovanje z mednarodnimi mrežami, kot so mreža agencij za gospodarski kriminal (ECAN) in nacionalni carinski organi, da bi pridobili dokaze od proizvajalcev, ladijskih prevoznikov, logističnih družb in pristaniških oblasti po vsem svetu;
Coordination of development assistance, development priorities, and getting results from Union aid
Usklajevanje razvojne pomoči in razvojnih prednostnih nalog ter doseganje rezultatov s pomočjo Unije
Notes that Union aid remains fragmented between Union instruments with regard to levels of action in the Union as well as Member States’ bilateral programmes and the European Investment Bank’s (EIB) interventions;
je seznanjen s tem, da pomoč Unije ostaja razdrobljena med instrumente Unije glede na stopnje ukrepanja v Uniji ter dvostranske programe držav članic in posredovanja Evropske investicijske banke (EIB);
this situation contributes to weaknesses in aid programming in crisis and fragile situations;
to stanje prispeva k pomanjkljivostim pri načrtovanju pomoči v času krize in nestabilnih razmer;
calls on the Commission to coordinate the different aid instruments across the Union;
poziva Komisijo, naj usklajuje različne instrumente pomoči v Uniji;
Regrets that only four countries — Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark and the Netherlands — exceeded Union targets for international development assistance in 2012, despite the fact that all have committed themselves to contribute 0,70 % of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in development aid;
obžaluje, da so samo štiri države – Švedska, Luksemburg, Danska in Nizozemska – presegle cilje Unije glede mednarodne razvojne pomoči v letu 2012, čeprav so se vse zavezale, da bodo prispevale 0,70 % svojega bruto domačega proizvoda v razvojni pomoči;
Reiterates that good governance, democracy, respect for human rights and poverty reduction must be integrated goals of the implementing organisations in countries where EDF support is distributed;
ponovno poudarja, da morajo biti dobro upravljanje, demokracija, spoštovanje človekovih pravic in zmanjševanje revščine vgrajeni v cilje izvajalskih organizacij v državah, kjer se zagotavlja podpora ERS;
calls on the Commission to more often use the political dialogue under Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement when there are violations of human rights, and if necessary suspend aid;
poziva Komisijo, naj pogosteje uporabi politični dialog v okviru člena 8 sporazuma iz Cotonouja v primeru kršitev človekovih pravic in po potrebi ustavi pomoč;
Points out that the Union needs a wide range of tools for development cooperation adapted to different contexts;
poudarja, da Unija potrebuje širok nabor orodij za razvojno sodelovanje, prilagojeno različnim okoliščinam;
emphasises especially the need for effective tools and working methods when dealing with failed states or with deeply undemocratic states;
poudarja zlasti potrebo po učinkovitih orodjih in delovnih metodah pri obravnavi propadlih držav ali zelo nedemokratičnih držav;
Stresses that the specific development policy objectives must be safeguarded under the EEAS;
poudarja, da je treba v okviru ESZD zaščititi posebne cilje razvojne politike;
emphasises that other considerations such as trade policy and foreign and security policy considerations should not cut across the Union’s development priorities;
poudarja, da drugi vidiki, kot so vidiki trgovinske ter zunanje in varnostne politike, ne bi smeli ovirati izvajanja razvojnih prednostnih nalog Unije;
Notes that the overall impact of the Union’s development policy is determined by the Union’s policies on agriculture, fisheries, energy and trade;
ugotavlja, da je skupni učinek razvojne politike Unije odvisen od politik Unije na področju kmetijstva, ribištva, energetike in trgovine;
stresses the need to ensure policy coherence for development in accordance with Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and that that policy should embody and comply with the ‘do no harm’ principle;
poudarja, da je treba v skladu s členom 208 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije zagotoviti skladnost politik za razvoj in da morajo te politike vsebovati in spoštovati načelo neškodovanja;
Stresses that more emphasis should be given to the sustainability of aid;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba večjo pozornost nameniti trajnosti pomoči;
is concerned about the persisting weaknesses in terms of efficiency (with 40,3 % of reviewed interventions facing problems), effectiveness (43 %) and sustainability (46 %) of ongoing projects and programmes in Sub Saharan Africa [19] revealed by on-site assessments by independent experts;
je zaskrbljen zaradi trajnih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z učinkovitostjo (težave so bile pri 40,3 % pregledanih posredovanjih) in uspešnostjo (43 %) ter vzdržnostjo (46 %) tekočih projektov v podsaharski Afriki [19], ki so se pokazale med oceno neodvisnih strokovnjakov na kraju samem;
notes that similar performance concerns affected implementation in the Caribbean, where the overall percentage of projects performing well or very well had decreased from 74,6 % in 2009, to 72,9 % in 2010 and 61,5 % in 2011 [20], as well as the Pacific region, where a significant share of the programs faced implementation difficulties [21];
ugotavlja, da so se podobne težave pojavljale pri izvajanju v karibskih državah, kjer se je splošna stopnja projektov, ki so potekali dobro ali zelo dobro, znižala s 74,6 % leta 2009 na 72,9 % leta 2010 oziroma na 61,5 % leta 2011 [20], in v pacifiških državah, kjer so se pri velikem delu programa spopadali s težavami pri izvajanju [21];
Is deeply concerned about the findings of the Court of Auditors contained in Special Reports Nos 1/2012 and 13/2012 of the Court of Auditors on the Effectiveness of European Union Development Aid for Food security in Sub-Saharan Africa and on the European Union Development Assistance for Drinking Water Supply and Basic Sanitation in Sub Saharan Countries respectively, which have demonstrated that the prospects for sustainability are good for half of the interventions but there are fewer guarantees of continued results for the other half;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitev Računskega sodišča v njegovih posebnih poročilih št. 1/2012 in 13/2012 o uspešnosti razvojne pomoči Evropske unije za zanesljivo preskrbo s hrano v podsaharski Afriki in o razvojni pomoči Evropske unije za oskrbo s pitno vodo in urejanje osnovnih sanitarnih razmer v podsaharskih državah, ki sta pokazali, da so obeti za doseganje trajnosti dobri pri polovici posredovanj, vendar pa je pri preostali polovici manj zagotovil glede trajnostne narave rezultatov;
welcomes the Court of Auditors’ recommendations contained in those reports and urges the Commission to take them on board in order to maximise the benefits from Union development expenditure;
pozdravlja priporočila Računskega sodišča v teh dveh poročilih in poziva Komisijo, naj jih upošteva, da bi zagotovila čim večjo koristnost odhodkov Unije za razvoj;
Is of the opinion that education plays a key role in development as it gives prospects for the sustainability of aid efforts and without it, even the best thought through technical policies will fail;
meni, da ima izobrazba ključno vlogo pri razvoju, saj obeta trajnost pri zagotavljanju pomoči, brez nje pa bi odpovedale celo najbolj premišljene tehnične politike;
recognises the challenges in this area, especially the difficulties in meeting global targets in terms of gender parity for school enrolment;
priznava izzive na tem področju, zlasti težave pri uresničevanju globalnih ciljev v smislu enakosti med spoloma pri vpisu v šole;
Believes that the Commission should be able to demonstrate to the taxpayers what has been achieved with Union development assistance in this field;
meni, da bi morala biti Komisija zmožna davkoplačevalcem pokazati, kaj je bilo doseženo z razvojno pomočjo Unije na tem področju;
calls on the Commission to formulate clear objectives which then make it possible to do actual performance audits;
poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje jasne cilje, ki bodo omogočili izvajanje dejanskih revizij uspešnosti;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission’s services are working on a common framework for measuring and communicating the results of development policy, including for inclusive and sustainable growth, as part of the implementation of the ‘Agenda for Change’;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da službe Komisije razvijajo skupni okvir za merjenje in objavljanje rezultatov razvojne politike, tudi za vključujočo in trajnostno rast, kot del izvajanja „agende za spremembe“;
calls on the Commission to communicate the outcome of those efforts to Parliament by the end of November 2013;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu do konca novembra 2013 sporoči rezultate teh prizadevanj;
Emphasises the value of performance audits conducted in the area of development aid by the Court of Auditors;
poudarja vrednost revizij uspešnosti, ki jih Računsko sodišče izvaja na področju razvojne pomoči;
encourages the Court of Auditors to concentrate more of its resources on audit work which addresses the risks to efficiency, effectiveness and economy;
spodbuja Računsko sodišče, naj več sredstev nameni revizijam, ki obravnavajo tveganja za uspešnost, učinkovitost in gospodarnost;
Stresses that long term social and economic development requires sustainable sources of income other than aid;
poudarja, da dolgoročni družbeni in gospodarski razvoj poleg pomoči potrebuje trajnostne vire dohodka;
considers that sound and well-functioning trade relations in line with WTO principles is a key issue in this regard for developing countries and therefore urges the Council, the Commission and the ACP countries to find solutions to the issues concerning the Economic Partnership Agreements and free trade between the Union and the ACP region;
meni, da so v zvezi s tem dobri in delujoči trgovinski odnosi v skladu z načeli STO bistveno vprašanje za države v razvoju, zato poziva Svet, Komisijo in države AKP, naj poiščejo rešitve za vprašanja glede sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu in prosti trgovini med Unijo in regijo AKP;
Budget support
Proračunska podpora
Takes note that in 2011 EUR 207 million was committed for budget support which represents 6,3 % of the overall amount of total commitments;
je seznanjen s tem, da je bilo leta 2011 sprejetih za 207 milijonov EUR obveznosti za proračunsko podporo, kar je 6,3 % skupnega zneska obveznosti;
Recalls that the Court of Auditors found in its Annual Report on the EDFs concerning the financial year 2011 that 23 % of budget support payments were affected by non-quantifiable errors;
opozarja, da je Računsko sodišče v letnem poročilu o ERS za proračunsko leto 2011 ugotovilo, da je pri 23 % izplačil proračunske podpore prišlo do nedoločljivih napak;
notes an improvement with regard to the previous reports’ findings;
je seznanjen z izboljšanjem v zvezi z ugotovitvami iz prejšnjih poročil;
is of the opinion, however, that the result for 2011 is still not satisfactory;
vendar meni, da rezultati za leto 2011 še vedno niso zadovoljivi;
Is deeply worried by the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that non-quantifiable errors resulted from the lack of a structured demonstration of compliance with the eligibility criteria because public financial management achievements were not compared with the objectives set for the period under review;
je resno zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitve Računskega sodišča, da so bile nedoločljive napake posledica tega, da spoštovanje meril za upravičenost ni bilo organizirano prikazano, ker se dosežki pri upravljanju javnih financ niso primerjali s cilji, določenimi za pregledano obdobje;
calls on the Commission to ensure a rigorous control of recipient countries both before and after the decision to grant budget support, in particular in countries receiving significant financial assistance from Union development funds in which corruption is very much on the increase;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi strog nadzor nad državami prejemnicami tako pred sprejetjem odločitve o odobritvi proračunske podpore kot po njem, zlasti kadar gre za države, ki v okviru razvojnih skladov prejemajo visoko finančno pomoč Unije in v katerih se stopnja korupcije naglo povečuje;
calls therefore for more effective Commission control mechanisms in order to ensure that European taxpayers’ money is not misappropriated for funding terrorism or corruption;
zato od Komisije zahteva boljše nadzorne mehanizme, da bi zagotovili, da se denar evropskih davkoplačevalcev ne zlorablja za financiranje terorizma ali korupcije;
Acknowledges the potential advantages of budget support;
priznava potencialne prednosti proračunske podpore;
draws attention, however, to the risks that this aid modality entails in that it is more vulnerable to fraud and corruption than other forms of aid, due to its fungibility;
vendar opozarja na tveganja, ki jih vključuje ta oblika pomoči, saj je zaradi svoje zamenljivosti bolj dovzetna za goljufije in korupcijo kot druge oblike pomoči;
recalls that control by the Court of Auditors over the funds paid as budget support ends the moment Union aid is paid to the partner country’s treasury;
opominja, da se nadzor Računskega sodišča nad sredstvi, izplačanimi iz proračunske podpore, konča takoj, ko se pomoč Unije vplača v blagajno partnerske države;
Stresses that those risks are especially alarming in the context of the massive outflows of illicit capital from developing countries referred to in paragraph 25;
poudarja, da so ta tveganja skrb zbujajoča zlasti v kontekstu množičnih odlivov nezakonitega kapitala iz držav v razvoju, kot je navedeno v odstavku 25;
urges the Commission to take into account the existing reporting on the illicit capital outflows before taking a decision on granting budget support;
poziva Komisijo, naj pred sprejetjem odločitve o odobritvi proračunske podpore preuči obstoječa poročila o nezakonitih odlivih kapitala;
Welcomes the Commission’s statement that the fight against fraud and corruption should receive greater prominence in budget support, particularly when assessing the Public Financial Management eligibility criterion in terms of budget support;
pozdravlja izjavo Komisije, da bi bilo treba v okviru proračunske podpore več pozornosti nameniti boju proti goljufijam in korupciji, zlasti med ocenjevanjem merila za upravičenost glede upravljanja javnih financ v zvezi s proračunsko podporo;
urges the Commission to therefore take into account existing reporting on corruption and fraud levels before taking a decision on granting budget support;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj pred sprejetjem odločitve o odobritvi proračunske podpore preuči obstoječa poročila o stopnji korupcije in goljufij;
insists that an independent national audit body must be a condition for granting budget support;
vztraja, da mora biti mnenje neodvisnega nacionalnega revizijskega organa pogoj za odobritev proračunske podpore;
Takes note that programmes related to good governance are financed in order to support developing countries in their fight against fraud, corruption and financial mismanagement;
je seznanjen s tem, da se programi, povezani z dobrim upravljanjem, financirajo za podporo državam v razvoju pri njihovem boju proti goljufijam, korupciji in nepravilnemu finančnemu poslovodenju;
keeping in mind that a corruption-free judicial system is a condition sine qua non to ensure good governance and rule of law, calls on the Commission to put a strong emphasis on the judiciary reform programmes;
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je pravosodni sistem brez korupcije nujni pogoj za zagotovitev dobrega upravljanja in pravne države, poziva Komisijo, naj posebej poudari programe pravosodne reforme;
acknowledges moreover that the Commission completed in 2011 a thematic evaluation on justice and security system reform;
poleg tega priznava, da je Komisija leta 2011 zaključila tematsko ocenjevanje reforme pravosodnih in varnostnih sistemov;
calls on the Commission to make publicly available the results of the evaluation;
poziva Komisijo, naj omogoči, da bodo rezultati ocenjevanja javno dostopni;
Recognises that the relatively low disbursement rate for EDF budget support payments in 2011 is a direct consequence of a more thorough assessment of partner governments’ compliance with eligibility criteria and/or performance indicators, which led the Commission to withhold disbursements totalling EUR 200 million in 16 ACP countries where insufficient progress was demonstrated against pre-defined objectives;
priznava, da je temeljitejša ocena ravnanja partnerskih vlad v skladu z merili upravičenosti in/ali kazalniki uspešnosti neposreden vzrok za sorazmerno nizko stopnjo izplačil za plačila proračunske podpore ERS v letu 2011, zaradi česar je Komisija zadržala izplačila v višini 200 milijonov EUR v 16 državah AKP, kjer ni bilo zadovoljivega napredka glede na predhodno določene cilje;
welcomes the new approach to Union’s budget support [22] introduced in October 2011, which contributes to strengthening domestic accountability mechanisms in ACP countries;
pozdravlja novi pristop k proračunski podpori Unije [22], uveden oktobra 2011, ki prispeva h krepitvi nacionalnih mehanizmov odgovornosti v državah AKP;
calls on the Commission to present the first results in terms of the effectiveness of this new approach to Parliament when the new guidelines have been fully applied;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu predloži prve rezultate v zvezi z učinkovitostjo tega novega pristopa, ko bodo v celoti uveljavljene nove smernice;
Repeats its call on the Commission and Member States to create a public register in which budget support agreements, procedures and development indicators are transparently listed [23];
ponovno poziva, naj Komisija in države članice vzpostavijo javni register, v katerem bodo pregledno navedeni sporazumi o proračunski podpori, postopki in kazalniki razvoja [23];
Repeats its call on the Commission to provide regular reports on the accomplishment of the goals set for Union budget support and on specific problems encountered in particular recipient countries;
ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj zagotavlja redna poročila o izpolnjevanju ciljev, določenih za proračunsko podporo Unije, in o specifičnih težavah, na katere je naletela v posameznih državah prejemnicah;
calls on the Commission to ensure that budget support is reduced or cancelled when clear goals are not achieved;
poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za to, da se proračunska podpora takrat, ko niso bili doseženi jasni cilji, zmanjša ali prekliče;
Union aid to Haiti
Pomoč Unije za Haiti
Urges the Commission to make public the performance indicators for budget support to the Republic of Haiti, and the respective assessments of the Government of Haiti’s performance in order to qualify for budget support, focussing on the following criteria:
poziva Komisijo, naj objavi kazalnike uspešnosti za proračunsko podporo Republiki Haiti in ustrezne ocene uspešnosti vlade Haitija, potrebne za upravičenost do proračunske podpore, pri čemer naj se osredotoči na naslednja merila:
stable macroeconomic framework;
stabilen makroekonomski okvir;
national or sector policies and reforms focused on sustainable growth and poverty reduction;
nacionalne ali sektorske politike in reforme, osredotočene na trajnostno rast in zmanjševanje revščine;
public financial management, including the fight against corruption;
upravljanje javnih financ, vključno z bojem proti korupciji;
transparency and oversight of the budget, also to the public;
preglednost in nadzor proračuna, tudi s strani javnosti;
Asks the Commission to apply from 2013 onwards, in a transparent way, the new criteria for budget support as described in the Commission’s policy ‘The future approach to EU budget support to third countries’ to the budget support for the Government of Haiti;
poziva Komisijo, naj od leta 2013 za proračunsko podporo vladi Haitija pregledno uporablja nova merila, opisana v sporočilu Komisije o prihodnjem pristopu k proračunski podpori EU za tretje države;
Deplores the lack of sustainability of some projects and stresses that projects should principally aim at creating employment and sustainable growth which would allow the Haitian State to increase its own revenues in order to depend less on foreign assistance;
obžaluje pomanjkanje trajnostnosti nekaterih projektov in poudarja, da bi morali biti usmerjeni predvsem v ustvarjanje delovnih mest in trajnostne rasti, s čimer bi Haiti lahko povečal lastne prihodke in zmanjšal odvisnost od tuje pomoči;
Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of the sustainability of the Union funded projects in Haiti based on a five-year perspective and to report to the discharge authorities on an annual basis;
poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi petletne perspektive zagotovi oceno trajnosti projektov, ki jih Unija financira na Haitiju, in naj vsako leto poroča organom za podelitev razrešnice;