natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The request shall be served on the other Contracting Parties, on the European Commission, on the EFTA Surveillance Authority and, where appropriate, on the other interested persons on whom a request for a preliminary ruling raising the same question of interpretation of European Union legislation would be served.
Predlog se vroči drugim podpisnicam, Evropski komisiji, Nadzornemu organu EFTA in glede na primer tudi drugim zainteresiranim subjektom, ki bi jim bil vročen predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe glede istega vprašanja za razlago zakonodaje Unije.
The President shall prescribe a time-limit within which the Contracting Parties and the other interested persons on whom the request has been served may submit written observations.
Predsednik določi rok, v katerem lahko podpisnice in drugi zainteresirani subjekti, ki se jim vroči predlog, predložijo pisna stališča.
The request shall be made in one of the languages referred to in Article 36 of these Rules.
Predlog se vloži v enem od jezikov iz člena 36 tega poslovnika.
Article 38 shall apply.
Uporablja se člen 38.
The provisions of Article 98 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Smiselno se uporablja člen 98.
As soon as the request referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has been submitted, the President shall designate a Judge-Rapporteur.
Predsednik nemudoma po vložitvi predloga iz odstavka 1 določi sodnika poročevalca.
The First Advocate General shall, immediately afterwards, assign the request to an Advocate General.
Takoj zatem prvi generalni pravobranilec zadevo dodeli generalnemu pravobranilcu.
The Court shall, after hearing the Advocate General, give a reasoned decision on the request.
Sodišče po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca o predlogu odloči z obrazloženo odločbo.
The decision of the Court, signed by the President, the Judges who took part in the deliberations and the Registrar, shall be served on the Contracting Parties and on the other interested persons referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Odločba Sodišča, ki jo podpišejo predsednik, sodniki, ki so sodelovali pri posvetovanju, in sodni tajnik, se vroči podpisnicam in drugim zainteresiranim subjektom iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
Settlement of the disputes referred to in Article 35 TEU in the version in force before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon
Reševanje sporov iz člena 35 PEU v različici, ki je veljala pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe
In the case of disputes between Member States as referred to in Article 35(7) TEU in the version in force before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, as maintained in force by Protocol No 36 annexed to the Treaties, the matter shall be brought before the Court by an application by a party to the dispute.
V primeru sporov med državami članicami iz člena 35(7) PEU v različici, ki je veljala pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, kakor je ohranjen v veljavi s Protokolom št. 36, priloženim k Pogodbama, se na predlog stranke v sporu zadeva predloži v odločanje Sodišču.
The application shall be served on the other Member States and on the European Commission.
Predlog se vroči drugim državam članicam in Evropski komisiji.
In the case of disputes between Member States and the European Commission as referred to in Article 35(7) TEU in the version in force before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, as maintained in force by Protocol No 36 annexed to the Treaties, the matter shall be brought before the Court by an application by a party to the dispute.
V primeru sporov med državami članicami in Evropsko komisijo iz člena 35(7) PEU v različici, ki je veljala pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, kakor je ohranjen v veljavi s Protokolom št. 36, priloženim k Pogodbama, se na predlog stranke v sporu zadeva predloži v odločanje Sodišču.
The application shall be served on the other Member States, the Council and the European Commission if it was submitted by a Member State.
Predlog se vroči drugim državam članicam, Svetu in Evropski komisiji, če ga je vložila država članica.
The application shall be served on the Member States and on the Council if it was submitted by the European Commission.
Če ga je vložila Evropska komisija, se vroči državam članicam in Svetu.
The President shall prescribe a time-limit within which the institutions and the Member States on which the application has been served may submit written observations.
Predsednik institucijam in državam članicam, ki se jim vroči predlog, določi rok za predložitev pisnih stališč.
As soon as the application referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 has been submitted, the President shall designate a Judge-Rapporteur.
Predsednik nemudoma po vložitvi predloga iz odstavka 1 ali 2 določi sodnika poročevalca.
The First Advocate General shall, immediately afterwards, assign the application to an Advocate General.
Takoj zatem prvi generalni pravobranilec zadevo dodeli generalnemu pravobranilcu.
The Court shall, after the Advocate General has delivered his Opinion, give its ruling on the dispute by way of judgment.
Sodišče po predstavitvi sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca o sporu odloči s sodbo.
The same procedure as that laid down in the preceding paragraphs shall apply where an agreement concluded between the Member States confers jurisdiction on the Court to rule on a dispute between Member States or between Member States and an institution.
Enak postopek, kot je ta iz prejšnjih odstavkov, se uporablja, če je Sodišče za odločanje v sporu med državami članicami ali med državami članicami in institucijami pristojno na podlagi sporazuma, sklenjenega med državami članicami.
Requests under Article 269 TFEU
Predlogi na podlagi člena 269 PDEU
Four certified copies shall be submitted of a request under Article 269 TFEU.
Predlog na podlagi člena 269 PDEU se vloži v štirih overjenih izvodih.
The request shall be accompanied by any relevant document and, in particular, any observations and recommendations made pursuant to Article 7 TEU.
Priložijo se mu vsi upoštevni dokumenti ter po potrebi zlasti stališča in priporočila, oblikovana na podlagi člena 7 PEU.
The request and annexes thereto shall be served on the European Council or on the Council, as appropriate, each of which shall have a time-limit of 10 days from such service to submit its written observations.
Predlog s prilogami se glede na primer vroči Evropskemu svetu ali Svetu, ki lahko v desetih dneh od vročitve predloži pisna stališča.
This time-limit shall not be extended.
Tega roka ni mogoče podaljšati.
The request and annexes thereto shall also be communicated to the Member States other than the State in question, to the European Parliament and to the European Commission.
Predlog s prilogami se pošlje tudi drugim državam članicam, kot je zadevna država, ter Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropski komisiji.
Following the lodging of the observations referred to in paragraph 2, which shall be served on the Member State concerned and on the States and institutions referred to in paragraph 3, the Court shall give its decision within a time-limit of one month from the lodging of the request and after hearing the Advocate General.
Po predložitvi stališč iz odstavka 2, ki se vročijo zadevni državi članici ter državam in institucijam iz odstavka 3, Sodišče po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca odloči v enem mesecu od vložitve predloga.
At the request of the Member State concerned, the European Council or the Council, or of its own motion, the Court may decide that the procedure before it shall also include a hearing, which all the States and institutions referred to in this Article shall be given notice to attend.
Na predlog zadevne države članice, Evropskega sveta ali Sveta ali po uradni dolžnosti lahko odloči, da bo postopek pred njim obsegal tudi obravnavo, na katero se povabijo vse države in institucije iz tega člena.
Supplementary rules
Dodatek k Poslovniku
Subject to the provisions of Article 253 TFEU and after consultation with the Governments concerned, the Court shall adopt supplementary rules concerning its practice in relation to:
Sodišče ob upoštevanju člena 253 PDEU po posvetovanju z zadevnimi vladami sprejme dodatek k temu poslovniku glede:
letters rogatory;
zaprosil za pravno pomoč;
applications for legal aid;
prošenj za brezplačno pravno pomoč;
reports by the Court of perjury by witnesses or experts, delivered pursuant to Article 30 of the Statute.
ovadb, ki jih Sodišče v skladu s členom 30 Statuta poda glede kršitev priseg prič ali izvedencev.
Implementing rules
Določbe za izvajanje
The Court may, by a separate act, adopt practice rules for the implementation of these Rules.
Sodišče lahko z ločenim aktom sprejme praktične določbe za izvajanje tega poslovnika.
These Rules replace the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities adopted on 19 June 1991, as last amended on 24 May 2011 (Official Journal of the European Union, L 162 of 22 June 2011, p. 17).
S tem poslovnikom se nadomesti Poslovnik Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 19. junija 1991, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen 24. maja 2011 (Uradni list Evropske unije, L 162, 22.6.2011, str. 17).
Publication and entry into force of these Rules
Objava in začetek veljavnosti tega poslovnika
These Rules, which are authentic in the languages referred to in Article 36 of these Rules, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following their publication.
Ta poslovnik, ki je verodostojen v jezikih iz njegovega člena 36, se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati prvi dan drugega meseca po objavi.
Done at Luxembourg, 25 September 2012.
V Luxembourgu, 25. septembra 2012
OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 27.
UL L 1, 3.1.1994, str. 27.
OJ, English Special Edition 1952-1958 (I), p. 59.
UL, 17 6.10.1958, str. 385.
Despite having been amended on several occasions over the years, the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice have remained fundamentally unchanged in structure since their original adoption on 4 March 1953.
Čeprav je bil Poslovnik Sodišča doslej večkrat spremenjen, njegova zgradba od prvotnega sprejetja 4. marca 1953 ni bila bistveno spremenjena.
The Rules of Procedure of 19 June 1991, which are currently in force, still reflect the initial preponderance of direct actions, whereas in fact the majority of such actions now fall within the jurisdiction of the General Court, and references for a preliminary ruling from the courts and tribunals of the Member States represent, quantitatively, the primary category of cases brought before the Court.
Trenutno veljavni Poslovnik z dne 19. junija 1991 še vedno odseva prvotno pretežnost direktnih tožb, medtem ko je danes za večino teh tožb dejansko pristojno Splošno sodišče, med kategorijami zadev, predloženih Sodišču, pa so po številu na prvem mestu predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe.
a request for information and production of documents;
zahteva za pojasnila in predložitev dokumentov;
oral testimony;
dokazovanje z zaslišanjem prič;
Section 1. Measures of organisation of procedure
Oddelek 1 – Ukrepi procesnega vodstva
Section 2. Measures of inquiry
Oddelek 2 – Pripravljalni ukrepi
any papers and documents relating to the proceedings shall be exempt from both search and seizure. In the event of a dispute, the customs officials or police may seal those papers and documents; they shall then be immediately forwarded to the Court for inspection in the presence of the Registrar and of the person concerned;
listine in dokumenti v zvezi s postopkom ne morejo biti predmet preiskave in jih ni mogoče zaseči; v primeru spora lahko carina ali policija te listine in dokumente zapečati in jih nato takoj pošlje Sodišču v pregled, ki se opravi ob navzočnosti sodnega tajnika in zadevne osebe;
The Registrar may be deprived of his office only if he no longer fulfils the requisite conditions or no longer meets the obligations arising from his office. The Court shall take its decision after giving the Registrar an opportunity to make representations.
Sodni tajnik je lahko razrešen le, če ne izpolnjuje več zahtevanih pogojev ali obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz njegovega položaja; Sodišče odloči po tem, ko sodnemu tajniku omogoči, da poda svoje stališče.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1/2012
of 3 January 2012
z dne 3. januarja 2012
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 543/2011 na podlagi izida večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj urugvajskega kroga določa merila, po katerih Komisija določi standardne vrednosti za uvoz iz tretjih držav za proizvode in obdobja iz dela A Priloge XVI k tej uredbi.
The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data.
Standardna uvozna vrednost se izračuna vsak delovni dan v skladu s členom 136(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 ob upoštevanju spremenljivih dnevnih podatkov.
Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
Zato bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Standardne uvozne vrednosti iz člena 136 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 3 January 2012.
V Bruslju, 3. januarja 2012
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Standardne uvozne vrednosti za določitev uvozne cene za nekatere vrste sadja in zelenjave
Standard import value
Standardna uvozna vrednost
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 2/2012
of 4 January 2012
z dne 4. januarja 2012
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 11(2) osnovne uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the European Commission (‘Commission’) after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom predložila Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija),
By Regulation (EC) No 1890/2005 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty and collected definitively the provisional duties imposed on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof (‘SSF’) originating in the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1890/2005 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev in dokončno pobral začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PENJ) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Indonezije, Tajvana, Tajske in Vietnama.
At the same time, the proceeding on imports of SSF originating in Malaysia and the Philippines was terminated.
Hkrati se je zaključil postopek glede uvoza PENJ s poreklom iz Malezije in Filipinov.
On 25 August 2009, following a review initiated on the basis of Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 768/2009 [3] amended the abovementioned measures as far as one exporting producer in Vietnam is concerned.
Svet je 25. avgusta 2009 po pregledu, ki se je začel na podlagi člena 11(3) osnovne uredbe, z Uredbo (ES) št. 768/2009 [3] spremenil navedene ukrepe v zvezi z enim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Vietnamu.
The Regulation which led to the imposition of the definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain SSF originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) and Taiwan, will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original Regulation’.
Uredba, ki je privedla do uvedbe dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih PENJ s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK) in Tajvana, se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna uredba“.
The investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation on the countries concerned will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih s prvotno uredbo za zadevne države, pa se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna preiskava“.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [4] of the definitive anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received on 19 August 2010 a request for the initiation of an expiry review of these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [4] veljavnih dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov 19. avgusta 2010 prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by the European Industrial Fasteners Institute (‘EIFI’) (‘the applicant’) on behalf of five Union producers: Bulnava SRL, Inox Viti di Cattinori Bruno & C. SNC, Inox Bolt SRL, Bontempi Vibo SpA. and Ugivis SA representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of the total Union production of SSF.
Zahtevek je vložil Evropski zavod za industrijske pritrdilne elemente (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EIFI ali vložnik) v imenu petih proizvajalcev Unije: Bulnava S.r.l., Inox Viti di Cattinori Bruno & C.s.n.c., Inox Bolt S.r.l., Bontempi Vibo S.p.A. in Ugivis S.A., ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje PENJ v Uniji.
The request was limited to the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports originating in the PRC and Taiwan (‘the countries concerned’).
Zahtevek je bil omejen na protidampinške ukrepe, uvedene na uvoz s poreklom iz LRK in Tajvana (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni državi).
Consequently, the anti-dumping measures imposed by the original Regulation on imports of SSF originating in Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand are not subject to this review.
Posledično za protidampinške ukrepe, uvedene s prvotno uredbo na uvoz PENJ s poreklom iz Vietnama, Indonezije in Tajske, ta pregled ne velja.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures imposed on imports of SSF originating in the countries concerned would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka ukrepov, uvedenih na uvoz PENJ s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, damping in škoda za industrijo Unije verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovila.
Initiation of an expiry review
Začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 19 November 2010, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5], the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (‘notice of initiation’).
Komisija je po posvetu s Svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, in je 19. novembra 2010 z obvestilom, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5], napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku).
Review investigation period and the period considered
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in obravnavano obdobje
The investigation of continuation of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava nadaljevanja dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2009 do 30. septembra 2010 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2007 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Preučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
The Commission officially advised the applicant, other known Union producers, exporting producers, importers, users in the Union known to be concerned and their associations, and the representatives of the countries concerned of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je uradno obvestila vložnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, uporabnike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in njihova združenja ter predstavnike zadevnih držav o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov.
The Commission also gave interested parties the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je zainteresiranim stranem dala možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
All interested parties, who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so zaprosile za zaslišanje in pokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo zaslišanje odobreno.
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers from the countries concerned, unrelated importers in the Union and Union producers involved in the investigation, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitnega velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz zadevnih držav, nepovezanih uvoznikov v Uniji in proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili vključeni v preiskavo, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above parties were requested, pursuant to Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the publication of the notice of initiation and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali bi bilo vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bile navedene strani pozvane, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe javijo in Komisiji v 15 dneh od objave obvestila o začetku zagotovijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the replies received it was decided to apply sampling in respect of Taiwanese exporting producers, unrelated importers in the Union and Union producers.
Glede na prejete odgovore je bilo odločeno, da se vzorčenje uporabi v zvezi s tajvanskimi proizvajalci izvozniki, nepovezanimi uvozniki v Uniji in proizvajalci Unije.
As regards the PRC, no exporting producers from the PRC cooperated in the investigation.
Kar zadeva LRK, v preiskavi ni sodeloval noben proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK.
Thirty six Taiwanese exporters/groups of exporters provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Šestintrideset tajvanskih izvoznikov/skupin izvoznikov je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.