natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
First of all, by the same token as for the court-supervised restructuring proceedings, it is considered that in principle the private market investor principle can be applied to measure 8, as this measure is severable from measures 4 and 5 (see recitals 189-191).
Kot tudi za postopek prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča Komisija meni, da načelo zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu lahko velja za ukrep 8, saj je ta ukrep ločen od ukrepov 4 in 5 (glej uvodne izjave 189–191).
Applying the private market investor principle to the case at hand, the Commission notes the following: Whereas it is true that not only the City of Mikkeli, but also [the private creditors] were subject to the conversion, the interest margin charged for the loans was not the same.
Pri uporabi načela zasebnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu v zadevnem primeru Komisija ugotavlja naslednje: res je, da pretvorba ni veljala le za mesto Mikkeli, temveč tudi za [zasebna upnika], vendar pa zaračunana obrestna marža za posojila ni bila enaka.
In fact, [one private creditor] asked for EURIBOR 3 months plus 1,5 % and [the other private creditor] for EURIBOR 3 months plus 2 %, whereas the City of Mikkeli only asked for EURIBOR 3 months plus 0,3 %.
Pravzaprav je [en zasebni upnik] zaprosil za 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 1,5 %, in [drugi zasebni upnik] za 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 2 %, mesto Mikkeli pa je zaprosilo za le 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 0,3 %.
Hence, the interest rate which the City of Mikkeli agreed to charge for the loan is 1,2 % below the interest that [one private creditor] charged and 1,7 % below the interest that [another private creditor] charged.
Zato je obrestna mera, ki jo je mesto Mikkeli zaračunalo za posojilo, za 1,2 % nižja od obresti, ki jo je zaračunal [en zasebni upnik], in za 1,7 % nižja od obresti, ki jo je zaračunal [drugi zasebni upnik].
Therefore, the argument that the City of Mikkeli acted on equal terms with private creditors can be rejected.
Zato se trditev, da je mesto Mikkeli delovalo pod enakimi pogoji kot zasebni upniki, lahko zavrne.
In light of the difference in interest rates it can also be excluded that the City of Mikkeli charged a market fee for the loan.
Ob upoštevanju razlike v obrestnih merah je mogoče izključiti tudi to, da je mesto Mikkeli za posojilo zaračunalo tržno provizijo.
Therefore, the loan into which the unpaid interest rates were converted by the City of Mikkeli provides an advantage to Karjaportti.
Zato posojilo, v katerega je mesto Mikkeli pretvorilo neplačane obrestne mere, zagotavlja prednost podjetju Karjaportti.
In addition, measure 8 meets all other requirements for the existence of state aid.
Poleg tega ukrep 8 izpolnjuje vse druge zahteve za obstoj državne pomoči.
As described in detail in recitals 133, 140 and 141 the loan consists of state resources and is imputable to the state, is selective and distorts competition and affects trade among the Member States.
Kot je podrobno opisano v uvodnih izjavah 133, 140 in 141, posojilo zajema državna sredstva in se pripiše državi, je selektivno ter izkrivlja konkurenco in vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that measure 8 constitutes state aid.
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija sklenila, da ukrep 8 pomeni državno pomoč.
Finland did not bring forward any arguments as regards the compatibility of measure 8.
Finska ni predložila nobenih utemeljitev glede združljivosti ukrepa 8.
As Karjaportti was in difficulty at the time of the conversion of the unpaid interest rates (see recitals 123-129), the Commission first assesses whether measure 8 is compatible as rescue and restructuring aid according to the R&R Guidelines.
Ker je bilo podjetje Karjaportti ob pretvorbi neplačanih obrestnih mer v težavah (glej uvodne izjave 123–129), Komisija najprej ocenjuje, ali je ukrep 8 združljiv kot pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje v skladu s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
At the time of granting, the R&R Guidelines 2004 were applicable [56].
V času dodelitve so se uporabljale smernice za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004 [56].
According to the R&R Guidelines 2004, a rescue aid has to meet certain requirements, which are not all fulfilled by the measure in question.
V skladu s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004 mora pomoč za reševanje izpolnjevati določene zahteve, ki jih zadevni ukrep ne izpolnjuje.
First, whereas the measure consists of liquidity support in the form a loan (point 25(a) of the R&R Guidelines 2004), the interest rate charged is not at least comparable to those observed for loans to healthy firms (reference rate for Finland in December 2005: 4,08 % plus 100 basis points; the interest rate charged for the loan was EURIBOR 3 months + 0,3 %, which amounted on 19 December 2005 to 2,486 % plus 30 basis points).
Čeprav ukrep zajema likvidnostno pomoč v obliki posojila (točka 25(a) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004), zaračunana obrestna mera ni primerljiva z ugotovljenimi obrestnimi merami za posojila zdravim podjetjem (referenčna obrestna mera za Finsko decembra 2005: 4,08 %, zvišana za 100 bazičnih točk; zaračunana obrestna mera za posojilo je bil 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 0,3 %, kar je 19 decembra 2005 znašalo 2,486 %, zvišanih za 30 bazičnih točk).
Second, Finland did not undertake to communicate a restructuring plan within six months of the authorisation of the aid and the duration of the measure was not limited to six months (point 25(a) and (c) of the R&R Guidelines 2004).
Drugič, Finska ni priglasila načrta prestrukturiranja v roku šestih mesecev od odobritve pomoči in trajanje ukrepa ni bilo omejeno na šest mesecev (točka 25(a) in (c) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004).
Third, the one time, last time principle (point 25(e) of the R&R Guidelines 2004) is not met, as the company has received incompatible and illegal state aid at times when it was in difficulty before.
Tretjič, načelo o enkratni pomoči (točka 25(e) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004) ni izpolnjeno, saj je podjetje prejelo nezdružljivo in nezakonito državno pomoč v preteklosti, ko je bilo v težavah.
The measure does not meet all the requirements for restructuring aid set out in the R&R Guidelines 2004 either.
Ukrep poleg tega ne izpolnjuje vseh zahtev za pomoč za prestrukturiranje, opredeljenih v smernicah za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004.
First, the measure is not conditional on the implementation of a restructuring plan (point 34 of the R&R Guidelines 2004).
Prvič, ukrep ni pogojen z izvajanjem načrta za prestrukturiranje (točka 34 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004).
Whereas it is true that a restructuring programme for Karjaportti was set up during the court-supervised restructuring proceedings, it does not comply with the requirements of point 35 of the R&R Guidelines 2004 (duration of 10 years, no sensitivity analysis, no return to long term viability within a reasonable time frame).
Res je, da je bil program prestrukturiranja za podjetje Karjaportti oblikovan med postopkom prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča, vendar ni v skladu z zahtevami iz točke 35 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004 (obdobje trajanja 10 let, ni analize občutljivosti, ni obnovitve dolgoročne sposobnosti preživetja v smiselnem časovnem okviru).
Second, aid beneficiaries are expected to make a significant contribution to the restructuring plan from their own resources (point 43 of the R&R Guidelines 2004) and for the measures under consideration, there is no indication of an own contribution of the beneficiary.
Drugič, od upravičencev pomoči se pričakuje, da bodo k načrtu prestrukturiranja znatno prispevali iz svojih sredstev (točka 43 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004), pri proučevanih ukrepih pa ni znakov o lastnih prispevkih upravičenca.
Third, the measure does not meet the one time, last time principle, as the company had received incompatible and illegal state aid at times when it was in difficulty before.
Tretjič, ukrep ne izpolnjuje načela o enkratni pomoči, saj je podjetje prejelo nezdružljivo in nezakonito državno pomoč v preteklosti, ko je bilo v težavah.
Accordingly, the Commission considers that the measure was not granted in accordance with the R&R Guidelines 2004.
Skladno s tem Komisija meni, da ukrep ni bil odobren v skladu s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004.
Further, it has to be considered whether measure 8 could be compatible on the basis of any other of the exemptions laid down in Article 107(2) and (3) of the TFEU.
Treba je še proučiti, ali bi lahko bil ukrep 8 združljiv na podlagi katere druge izjeme, določene v členih 107(2) in (3) PDEU.
For the same reasons as set out above for measure 4 and measures 5 (see recitals 179-186), the Commission considers that none of the exemptions is met.
Komisija zaradi istih razlogov, kot so opredeljeni zgoraj za ukrepa 4 in 5 (glej uvodne izjave 179–186), meni, da ni izpolnjena nobena izjema.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that measure 8 involves state aid that is not compatible with the internal market.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da ukrep 8 zajema državno pomoč in ni združljiv z notranjim trgom.
Write-off of debts in the financial statements in 2006 and in 2008 (measure 9 and measure 10)
Odpis dolgov v računovodskih izkazih iz let 2006 in 2008 (ukrepa 9 in 10)
First, it has to be verified whether these debt write-offs could confer an advantage to Karjaportti.
Najprej je treba preveriti, ali bi ti odpisi dolgov lahko dodelili prednost podjetju Karjaportti.
This would be the case if the City of Mikkeli abandoned to pursue the collection of the debts, that is if it waived the debts in question.
To bi veljalo, če mesto Mikkeli ne bi nadaljevalo z izterjavo dolgov, tj. če bi odpisalo zadevne dolgove.
As described at recital 105, Finland confirmed that the write-off of debts was only an accounting measure that does not affect the legal relationship between the creditor and the debtor, that is to say that the debts were not waived.
Kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 105, je Finska potrdila, da je bil odpis dolgov le računovodski ukrep, ki ne vpliva na pravno razmerje med upnikom in dolžnikom, tj. da dolgovi niso bili opuščeni.
According to the documents submitted by Finland, the City of Mikkeli is still pursuing collection of the debts.
V skladu z dokumenti, ki jih je predložila Finska, mesto Mikkeli nadaljuje z izterjavo dolgov.
According to the principle of prudence under the good accounting practice and in accordance with Accounting Act 1336/1997, the value of receivables entered in the balance sheet may not exceed their probable value.
V skladu z načelom previdnosti pri dobri računovodski praksi in z Zakonom o računovodstvu 1336/1997 vrednost denarnih terjatev v bilanci stanja ne sme presegati njihove verjetne vrednosti.
Accordingly, receivables that probably cannot be collected are recorded in the profit and loss statement as an expense.
V skladu s tem so denarne terjatve, ki jih verjetno ni mogoče izterjati, zabeležene v izkazu dobička in izgube kot odhodek.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission considers that the debt write-off was only done in the financial accounts of the City of Mikkeli in line with accounting standards and the respective claims are still pursued within the court-supervised restructuring proceedings.
Na podlagi navedenega Komisija meni, da je bil odpis dolgov opravljen le v finančnih računih mesta Mikkeli v skladu z računovodskimi standardi in da se zadevni zahtevki še nadalje poskušajo izterjati v okviru postopka prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča.
The doubts raised by the Commission in the opening decision have been dispelled and it can be concluded that the measures did not provide an advantage to Karjaportti.
Pomisleki Komisije iz prve odločitve o začetku postopka se ovržejo in Komisija je sklenila, da ukrep ni dodelil prednosti podjetju Karjaportti.
Therefore, measure 9 and 10 do not involve state aid.
Zato ukrepa 9 in 10 ne zajemata državne pomoči.
Finland's argument that the measure is inherent to court-supervised restructuring proceedings and does not involve state aid can be rejected.
Trditev Finske, da je ukrep neločljivo povezan s postopkom prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča in ne zajema državne pomoči, se lahko zavrne.
First, the rescheduling of debts in 2009 was not foreseen in the initial restructuring programme and second, the fact that such a restructuring would be undertaken in line with the national legislation is not sufficient to exclude state aid [57].
Odlog dolgov leta 2009 ni bil predviden v prvotnem programu prestrukturiranja in dejstvo, da bi tako prestrukturiranje potekalo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ni dovolj, da se izključi državna pomoč [57].
In principle, also measures mitigating the charges which are normally included in the budget of an undertaking, can be considered as state aid.
Načeloma se lahko tudi ukrepi za zniževanje stroškov, ki so običajno vključeni v proračun podjetja, upoštevajo kot državna pomoč.
Concerning rescheduling of debts, the Commission is assessing such behaviour with the private creditor test [58].
Pri odlogu dolgov Komisija tako ravnanje ocenjuje s preskusom zasebnega upnika [58].
There, the state is rather viewed as a public creditor which, like a private creditor, seeks to recover sums due to it and which, to that end, concludes agreements with the debtor, under which the accumulated debts are to be rescheduled or paid by instalments in order to facilitate their repayment [59].
V njem je država obravnavana kot javni upnik, ki tako kot zasebni upnik teži k pridobitvi zapadlih zneskov in v zvezi s tem sklepa pogodbe z dolžnikom, v skladu s katerimi se nakopičeni dolgovi prerazporedijo ali plačajo v obrokih, da se pospeši njihovo poplačilo [59].
There is favourable treatment in the meaning of Article 107(1) of the TFEU if the amount owed can be paid back to the public creditor at more favourable terms than would be permitted by a private creditor.
Ugodnejša obravnava obstaja v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU, če se lahko dolgovani znesek javnemu upniku poplača po ugodnejših pogojih, kot bi jih dovolil zasebni upnik.
The Commission takes note of the argument of Finland that the rescheduling was never implemented as the administrative court of Kuopio (Kuopion Hallinto-Oikeus) prohibited its implementation.
Komisija upošteva utemeljitev Finske, da odlog plačila ni bil nikoli izvajan, saj je upravno sodišče mesta Kuopio (Kuopion Hallinto-Oikeus) prepovedalo njegovo izvajanje.
However, as Finland states, the repayment schedule of the debt has nonetheless been extended, resulting in a deferral of due payments.
Vendar je bil, kot navaja Finska, rok poplačila dolga vseeno podaljšan, posledica tega pa je bil odlog zapadlih plačil.
In this context, the Commission notes that the actually implemented rescheduling differs from the notified rescheduling as regards the amounts and the timeframe.
V tem okviru Komisija ugotavlja, da se dejansko izvajanje odloga plačila razlikuje od priglašenega odloga v zvezi z zneski in časovnim okvirom.
The amount actually rescheduled by the City of Mikkeli is lower than the originally notified amount and the rescheduling was only granted for shorter periods than originally notified.
Znesek, katerega plačilo je mesto Mikkeli v resnici odložilo, je manjši kot prvotno priglašeni znesek, odlog plačila pa je bil dodeljen za krajša obdobja, kot je bilo prvotno priglašeno.
In light of this, it is considered that the notified measure has been implemented with modifications.
Ob upoštevanju tega Komisija meni, da je bil priglašeni ukrep izvajan s spremembami.
Irrespective of these modifications, the Commission notes that no private creditor would ever have accepted a debt rescheduling in whatever form for reasons set out in this recital.
Ne glede na te spremembe Komisija ugotavlja, da noben zasebni upnik ne bi sprejel odloga plačila dolga v kateri koli obliki zaradi razlogov, opredeljenih v tej uvodni izjavi.
A private creditor will normally enforce its claims if it has previously entered into agreements on the rescheduling of debts which have not been honoured by the debtor [60].
Zasebni upnik bo običajno uveljavil svoje zahtevke, če je prej sklenil sporazume o odlogu plačila dolgov, ki jih dolžnik ni spoštoval [60].
The City of Mikkeli, on the contrary, agreed to a subsequent debt rescheduling after Karjaportti had failed to respect the conditions of the debt rescheduling agreed to during the court-supervised restructuring proceedings.
Nasprotno pa je mesto Mikkeli soglašalo z odlogom plačila dolga po tem, ko podjetje Karjaportti ni spoštovalo pogojev odloga plačila dolga, s katerim je soglašalo med postopkom prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča.
In addition, there are no particular reasons for non-enforcement, such as higher securities provided to the City of Mikkeli.
Poleg tega ni posebnih razlogov za neuveljavitev, kot na primer višje zastave, zagotovljene mestu Mikkeli.
Lastly, as regards the prospects of future profitability and viability of the company, the Commission considers that the financial situation of the company was such that it did not give cause to believe that investments would reach an acceptable level of profitability within a reasonable period.
O verjetni donosnosti in sposobnosti preživetja podjetja v prihodnosti Komisija meni, da glede na finančni položaj podjetja ni bilo razlogov za prepričanje, da bodo naložbe dosegle sprejemljivo raven donosnosti v razumnem obdobju.
At the time of granting, Karjaportti was in bankruptcy proceedings and in addition, since 2004, the company had been in court-supervised restructuring proceedings.
Ob dodelitvi je bilo podjetje Karjaportti v stečajnem postopku, poleg tega pa je od leta 2004 potekal postopek prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča.
In light of this, the Commission notes that a hypothetical private creditor, in the same situation as the City of Mikkeli, would not have accepted continued rescheduling of the debts.
Ob upoštevanju tega Komisija ugotavlja, da hipotetični zasebni upnik v enakem položaju kot mesto Mikkeli ne bi sprejel nadaljnjega odloga dolgov.
In this context, Finland states that the City of Mikkeli has acted on equal terms with the other creditors of Karjaportti.
V tem okviru Finska navaja, da je mesto Mikkeli delovalo pod enakimi pogoji kot drugi upniki podjetja Karjaportti.
In fact, concerning the notified debt rescheduling, the agreement of the private creditors was, according to Finland, conditional on the agreement by the City of Mikkeli.
Pravzaprav je bil po navedbah Finske sporazum zasebnih upnikov glede priglašenega odloga plačila dolgov pogojen s sporazumom mesta Mikkeli.
Second, it seems that the intended debt rescheduling did not foresee the same conditions for all of the secured creditors.
Zdi se, da načrtovani odlog plačila dolgov ni predvideval enakih pogojev za vse zavarovane upnike.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the measure does not meet the private creditor test and that it provides an advantage to Karjaportti.
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija sklenila, da ukrep ne izpolnjuje preskusa zasebnega upnika in dodeljuje prednost podjetju Karjaportti.
As regards the other requirements for the existence of state aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the TFEU, the Commission notes that the rescheduling was agreed to by the City of Mikkeli and accordingly consists of state resources and is imputable to the state.
Glede drugih zahtev za obstoj državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU Komisija ugotavlja, da je mesto Mikkeli soglašalo z odlogom ter da zato zajema državna sredstva in se pripiše državi.
In addition, the measure can be considered selective.
Poleg tega je ukrep selektiven.
Finally, it distorts competition and affects trade among the Member States, as described in more detail in recitals 133, 140 and 141.
Ukrep poleg tega izkrivlja konkurenco in vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami, kot je podrobneje opisano v uvodnih izjavah 133, 140 in 141.
Finland's main argument was that this measure did not involve state aid; it had, however, also notified measure 12 as rescue aid (see recital 1).
Glavna utemeljitev Finske je bila, da ta ukrep ni zajemal državne pomoči, vendar pa je ukrep 12 priglasila kot pomoč za reševanje (glej uvodno izjavo 1).
In fact, when the City of Mikkeli agreed to the debt rescheduling, Karjaportti was in difficulty within the meaning of point 10(c) of the R&R Guidelines 2004 (see recitals 123-129).
Pravzaprav je bilo podjetje Karjaportti v času, ko je mesto Mikkeli soglašalo z odlogom plačila dolga, v težavah v smislu točke 10(c) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004 (glej uvodne izjave 123–129).
Accordingly, the compatibility of the measure in question has to be considered on the basis of the R&R Guidelines 2004.
V skladu s tem je treba združljivost zadevnega ukrepa obravnavati na podlagi smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004.
First, the measure does not consist of liquidity support in the form of loan guarantees or loans (point 25 (a) of the R&R Guidelines 2004, but of deferral of payments.
Ukrep ne zajema likvidnostne pomoči v obliki poroštev za posojilo ali v obliki posojil (točka 25(a) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004), temveč odlog plačil.
It is noted that no restructuring plan within the meaning of point 35 of the R&R Guidelines 2004 was set up.
Ugotavlja se, da ni bil oblikovan načrt za prestrukturiranje v smislu točke 35 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004.
Further, it has to be considered whether measure 12 could be compatible on the basis of any other of the exemptions laid down in Article 107(2) and (3) of the TFEU.
Treba je še proučiti, ali bi lahko bil ukrep 12 združljiv na podlagi katere druge izjeme, določene v členih 107(2) in (3) PDEU.
The exemptions in Article 107(2) of the TFEU do not apply in the present case because this measure does not have a social character, has not been awarded to individual consumers, is not designed to make good damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences and has not been awarded to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by the division of that country.
Izjeme iz člena 107(2) PDEU se v tem primeru ne uporabljajo, ker ta ukrep nima socialnega značaja, ni bil dodeljen posameznim potrošnikom, ni bil namenjen povrnitvi škode, ki so jo povzročile naravne nesreče ali izjemni dogodki, in ni bil dodeljen gospodarstvu nekaterih območij Zvezne republike Nemčije, ki jih je prizadela delitev te države.
Further exemptions are set out in Article 107(3) of the TFEU.
Dodatne izjeme so opredeljene v členu 107(3) PDEU.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that the aid is not eligible for the derogation provided for in Article 107(3)(a) of the TFEU.
V skladu s tem je Komisija sklenila, da pomoč ni upravičena do odstopanja, določenega v členu 107(3)(a) PDEU.
Article 107(3)(b) of the TFEU states that “aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State” may be declared compatible with the internal market.
Člen 107(3)(b) PDEU določa, da se „pomoč za pospeševanje izvedbe pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa ali za odpravljanje resne motnje v gospodarstvu države članice“ lahko razglasi za združljivo z notranjim trgom.
In view of the foregoing considerations, the Commission concludes that the aid does not qualify for the derogation enshrined in Article 107(3)(b) of the TFEU.
Komisija je na podlagi navedenega sklenila, da pomoč ni upravičena do odstopanja iz člena 107(3)(b) PDEU.
On the basis of the foregoing arguments, the Commission considers that measure 12 involves state aid that is not compatible with the internal market.
Na podlagi navedenih utemeljitev Komisija meni, da ukrep 12 zajema državno pomoč, ki ni združljiva z notranjim trgom.
As a preliminary remark, the Commission recalls that Finland has, in the context of state aid decision N 715/2006, given a commitment that the activities of Finnvera will be limited to administering state aid schemes.
V uvodni opombi Komisija opozarja, da je Finska v okviru odločitve o državni pomoči N 715/2006 navedla, da bodo dejavnosti podjetja Finnvera omejene na upravljanje shem državne pomoči.