natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed, the target profit margin was provisionally set at 5 %, because it is considered that it corresponds to the margin that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector of the product investigated under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports, on sales of the like product in the Union as indicated by the Union industry.
Stopnja ciljnega dobička je bila res začasno določena na 5 %, ker se šteje, da to ustreza stopnji, ki bi jo industrija te vrste v sektorju preiskovanega izdelka lahko dosegla s prodajo podobnega izdelka v Uniji v običajnih konkurenčnih pogojih, tj. brez dampinškega uvoza, kot je navedla industrija Unije.
Furthermore this 5 % is a pre-tax profit margin which was considered as an appropriate minimum in other investigation into similar products in the same sector.
Poleg tega je teh 5 % stopnja dobička pred odbitkom davka, ki se je obravnavala kot ustrezna minimalna stopnja v drugih preiskavah podobnih izdelkov v istem sektorju.
During the IP the sampled Union producers managed to break even; however, the price pressure exerted by dumped imports prevented them from aligning their prices with costs and thus to achieve satisfactory results.
Proizvajalci Unije so v OP dosegli prag dobička, toda zaradi cenovnega pritiska, ki ga je povzročil dampinški uvoz, cen niso mogli uskladiti s stroški in zato niso dosegli zadovoljivih rezultatov.
This situation is also explained by the fact that the product under investigation is considered to be a commodity and thus prices are the main factor which is driving customer’s choices.
Ta položaj je pojasnjen tudi z dejstvom, da se izdelek iz preiskave obravnava kot osnovni izdelek, zato so cene glavni dejavnik, ki vpliva na izbiro strank.
The evolution of profitability and cash flow during the period considered limited the ability of the sampled Union producers to invest in their activities and undermined their development.
Razvoj dobičkonosnosti in denarnega toka je v obravnavanem obdobju omejil zmožnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije za vlaganje v svoje dejavnosti in ogrozil njihov razvoj.
As a consequence the ability of the Union producers to raise capital and finance costs was hindered.
Zato je bila zmožnost zbiranja kapitala in kritja stroškov proizvajalcev Unije omejena.
In light of the above, it can be concluded that the financial performance of the sampled Union producers remained somewhat fragile during the IP.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je mogoče sklepati, da je finančna uspešnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v OP ostala nekoliko negotova.
The level of stocks of the sampled Union producers increased by 41 % during the period considered; their increase coincided with losses in market share, in particular during the IP.
Raven zalog vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 41 %, to povečanje pa je sovpadlo z izgubo tržnega deleža, zlasti v OP.
The average labour costs of the sampled Union producers increased modestly during the period considered therefore they do not represent a determining factor in the rise of cost of production.
Povprečni stroški dela vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije so se v obravnavanem obdobju skromno povečali, zato niso odločilen dejavnik pri povečanju stroškov proizvodnje.
Average labour costs per employee (EUR)
Povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega (v EUR)
Indeed, in the context of a booming market, certain indicators such as production and sales volume of the Union industry increased significantly between 2009 and 2010 but then registered a slowdown from 2010 onwards.
Nekateri kazalniki, kot sta proizvodnja in obseg prodaje industrije Unije, so se v času razcveta trga med letoma 2009 in 2010 res znatno povečali, toda od leta 2010 naprej so zabeležili upočasnitev.
This situation occurred despite a continued increase in consumption.
Ta položaj se je pojavil kljub nadaljnjemu povečanju potrošnje.
In light of the foregoing, it is provisionally concluded that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno se začasno sklene, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the dumped imports from India had caused injury to the Union industry to a degree sufficient to be considered as material.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 3(6) in (7) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je dampinški uvoz iz Indije industriji Unije povzročil tolikšno škodo, da se šteje za znatno.
Known factors other than the dumped imports, which could at the same time be injuring the Union industry, were also examined to ensure that the possible injury caused by these other factors was not attributed to the dumped imports.
Poleg dampinškega uvoza so bili proučeni tudi drugi znani dejavniki, ki bi lahko hkrati povzročali škodo industriji Unije, in sicer zaradi zagotovitve, da morebitna škoda, ki bi jo povzročili ti drugi dejavniki, ne bi bila pripisana dampinškemu uvozu.
The investigation showed that the Union consumption increased by 50 % over the period considered and at the same time the volume of imports originating in India more than doubled.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je potrošnja Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 50 % in da se je istočasno obseg uvoza iz Indije več kot podvojil.
On the other hand, the increase of dumped imports coincided with a slowdown in the sales volume of the Union industry to unrelated parties between 2010 and the IP.
Po drugi strani je povečanje dampinškega uvoza sovpadlo z upočasnjeno rastjo obsega prodaje industrije Unije nepovezanim strankam med letom 2010 in OP.
With regard to the price pressure prevailing on the Union market during the period considered, it was found that the average import prices from India remained constantly lower than the average sales prices of the Union industry.
V zvezi s cenovnim pritiskom, ki je v obravnavanem obdobju prevladoval na trgu Unije, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so povprečne cene uvoza iz Indije v celem obdobju ostale nižje od povprečnih prodajnih cen industrije Unije.
By undercutting the Union industry on average by 15 % during the IP, Indian dumped imports increased their market share from 2009 to the IP by 40 %, whilst the market share of the Union industry decreased by 4,7 percentage points (from 67,6 % in 2009 to 62,9 % in the IP).
Dampinški uvoz iz Indije je v OP nelojalno znižal prodajne cene industrije Unije za povprečno 15 % in tako povečal svoj tržni delež za 40 % med letom 2009 in OP, medtem ko se je tržni delež industrije Unije zmanjšal za 4,7 odstotne točke (s 67,6 % leta 2009 na 62,9 % v OP).
The loss in market share reveals that the Union industry could only benefit from the increased consumption to a limited extent.
Izguba tržnega deleža kaže, da je industrija Unije lahko samo v omejenem obsegu izkoristila povečano potrošnjo.
In view of the increasing cost of production, the Union industry tried to increase the unit price to unrelated customers as shown in recital 93 above.
Industrija Unije je zaradi naraščajočih proizvodnih stroškov poskušala zvišati ceno na enoto za nepovezane stranke, kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi 93.
However, due to the price pressure exerted by the increasing volumes of dumped Indian imports as stated above, the price increase was not sufficient to sustain the growing costs, thus the Union industry could not reach satisfactory profit levels that could be considered necessary for this particular industry.
Vendar zaradi cenovnega pritiska, ki ga je povzročil vse večji obseg dampinškega uvoza iz Indije, kot je navedeno zgoraj, zvišanje cen ni zadostovalo za pokritje naraščajočih stroškov, zato industrija Unije ni mogla doseči zadovoljive ravni dobička, ki se lahko šteje za nujno za to industrijo.
Based on the above, it is concluded that the surge of dumped imports from India at prices constantly undercutting those of the Union industry have had a determining role for the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Glede na navedeno je bilo ugotovljeno, da je povečanje dampinškega uvoza iz Indije po cenah, ki so stalno nelojalno nižale prodajne cene industrije Unije, odločilno prispevalo k povzročitvi znatne škode za industrijo Unije.
People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Ljudska republika Kitajska (LRK)
Total of all third countries except India
Skupno vse tretje države, razen Indije
Apart from the dumped imports from India that constituted 48 % of all imports into the Union market during the IP, there were other sources of imports, including the People’s Republic of China, Korea and Switzerland, that had to be examined in the context of the causal link.
Poleg dampinškega uvoza iz Indije, ki je predstavljal 48 % celotnega uvoza na trg Unije v OP, je bilo treba v zvezi z vzročno zvezo proučiti tudi druge vire uvoza, vključno z Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko, Korejo in Švico.
The average price from the People’s Republic of China was below the price level of the Union industry and that country’s market share showed an increasing trend during the period considered.
Povprečna cena uvoza iz Ljudske republike Kitajske je bila nižja od ravni cen industrije Unije, tržni delež navedene države pa je v obravnavanem obdobju naraščal.
However, the investigation showed that the product mix represented by the Chinese imports is different and that the Chinese products are not in direct competition with the ones of the Union industry or those of Indian origin.
Vendar pa je preiskava pokazala, da je bil nabor izdelkov, uvoženih iz Kitajske, drugačen in da kitajski izdelki niso neposredno konkurenčni izdelkom industrije Unije ali izdelkom s poreklom iz Indije.
It was therefore considered that the Chinese exports could not have had a significant impact on the core product types sold by the Union industry in the Union market.
Zato se je štelo, da izvoz iz Kitajske ne more znatno vplivati na osnovne vrste izdelkov, ki jih prodaja industrija Unije na trgu Unije.
Hence, any effect the imports from China may have had on the injury suffered by the Union industry was minimal.
Torej je bil morebiten učinek uvoza iz Kitajske na škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, minimalen.
Nevertheless, an exporting producer claimed that imports of stainless steel wires from the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Switzerland should have been included in the scope of this investigation.
Vseeno je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da bi bilo treba uvoz žic iz nerjavnega jekla iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Republike Koreje in Švice vključiti v obseg te preiskave.
In addition to the facts and considerations given above, it should be noted that, at initiation stage and up to now, there is no evidence of dumping, injury and or causal link which would have justified the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports originating in the abovementioned countries.
Poleg navedenih dejstev in premislekov je treba opozoriti, da v začetni fazi in vse do zdaj ni bilo dokazov o dampingu, škodi ali vzročni zvezi, ki bi utemeljili začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom iz navedenih držav.
Moreover, even if there would be evidence to justify investigating other imports, a difference in treatment which consists of opening an anti-dumping proceeding against Indian imports only would not qualify as discriminatory.
Tudi če bi obstajali dokazi, ki bi utemeljili preiskavo uvoza iz drugih držav, razlika v obravnavi, tj. začetek protidampinškega postopka samo proti uvozu iz Indije, ne bi pomenila diskriminacije.
The claim that these countries should have been included in the scope of the investigation is therefore not founded and should be rejected.
Zato trditev, da bi bilo treba te države vključiti v obseg preiskave, ni utemeljena in jo je treba zavrniti.
On the basis of above, it is concluded that exports from third countries did not contribute significantly to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklene, da izvoz iz tretjih držav ni znatno prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Based on this, it can be concluded that the export activity of the Union industry could not be a potential cause of material injury.
Na podlagi tega se lahko sklene, da izvozna dejavnost industrije Unije ni mogla biti morebitni vzrok za znatno škodo.
The economic crisis and prices of raw materials
Gospodarska kriza in cene surovin
As mentioned in recital 68 above, consumption in 2009 was particularly low due to the exceptional high price level of nickel and the effects of the economic crisis.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 68, je bila potrošnja v letu 2009 posebej nizka zaradi izredno visokih ravni cene niklja in učinkov gospodarske krize.
The investigation showed that even during the general economic recovery, the Union industry was unable to benefit from the growing consumption and was losing market share throughout the period considered, whereas the dumped Indian exports gained more market share.
Preiskava je pokazala, da industrija Unije tudi med splošnim gospodarskim okrevanjem ni mogla izkoristiti naraščajoče potrošnje in da se je njen tržni delež manjšal v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju, medtem ko se je tržni delež dampinškega izvoza iz Indije povečal.
Therefore, although the economic crisis and the increase in the prices of the raw materials may have contributed to the Union industry’s poor performance, overall, it cannot be considered to have an impact such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury that the Union industry suffered during the IP.
Zato, čeprav sta gospodarska kriza in zvišanje cen surovin morda pripomogla k slabi uspešnosti industrije Unije, na splošno ni mogoče šteti, da je njun učinek prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je industrija Unije utrpela v OP.
It has been demonstrated that there was a substantial increase in the volume and market share of the dumped imports originating in India in the period considered (by 110 % and by 40 % respectively).
Dokazano je bilo, da sta se obseg in tržni delež dampinškega uvoza iz Indije v obravnavanem obdobju bistveno povečala (za 110 % oziroma 40 %).
In addition, it was found that these imports were constantly undercutting the prices charged by the Union industry on the Union market and in particular during the IP (on average by 15 %).
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je ta uvoz stalno nelojalno nižal prodajne cene industrije Unije na trgu Unije, zlasti pa v OP (povprečno za 15 %).
The examination of the other known factors which could have caused injury to the Union industry revealed that these factors were not such as to break the causal link established between the dumped imports from India and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Preiskava drugih znanih dejavnikov, ki bi lahko škodovali industriji Unije, je pokazala, da ti dejavniki niso bili takšni, da bi prekinili vzročno zvezo, vzpostavljeno med dampinškim uvozom iz Indije in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Based on the above analysis, which had distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors on the situation of the Union in industry from the injurious effects of the dumped exports, it is provisionally concluded that the dumped imports from India have caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi navedene analize, pri kateri so bili vsi znani dejavniki, ki vplivajo na položaj industrije Unije, prepoznani in ločeni od škodljivih učinkov dampinškega uvoza, se začasno ugotovi, da je dampinški uvoz iz Indije povzročil industriji Unije znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation it has been examined whether, despite the provisional finding of injurious dumping, compelling reasons exist for concluding that it is not in the Union interest to adopt measures in this particular case.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe se je proučevalo, ali kljub začasni ugotovitvi škodljivega dampinga obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za sklep, da sprejetje ukrepov v tem posebnem primeru ni v interesu Unije.
The analysis of the Union interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests involved, including those of the Union industry, importers, and users.
Analiza interesa Unije je temeljila na oceni vseh različnih vpletenih interesov, vključno z interesi industrije Unije, uvoznikov in uporabnikov.
The Union industry is composed of 27 known producers representing all of the Union production of the like product.
Industrija Unije vključuje 27 znanih proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo celotno proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
The producers are located in different Member States of the Union, employing directly 1747 people in relation to the like product during the IP.
Proizvajalci so v različnih državah članicah Unije in so v OP neposredno zaposlovali 1747 ljudi v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom.
One Union producer, representing a relatively small share of the Union production and having a related company in India opposed the initiation of the investigation.
Eden od proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavlja razmeroma majhen delež proizvodnje Unije in ima povezano družbo v Indiji, je nasprotoval začetku preiskave.
As mentioned in recital 22, it also argued that the highly technical products should not be covered and that it was not in the Union interest to impose the same measures on this product type.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 22 je trdil tudi, da visokotehnološki izdelki ne bi smeli biti zajeti in da uvedba enakih ukrepov za to vrsto izdelka ni v interesu Unije.
As mentioned in recital 72 this concern was addressed in the questionnaire by enlarging the PCNs which clearly identified these types in the investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 72, se je ta težava v vprašalniku rešila z razširitvijo kontrolnih številk izdelka, s čimer so se jasno opredelile zadevne vrste v preiskavi.
However, at this stage, the investigation revealed that highly technical products were covered by the investigation and that Indian exporting producers only exported limited quantities of these product types.
Vendar je preiskava v tej fazi pokazala, da preiskava zajema visokotehnološke izdelke in da proizvajalci izvozniki iz Indije izvažajo le omejene količine te vrste izdelkov.
Hence, the concerns expressed by this producer were not considered to be founded and its claim was rejected.
Zato se pomisleki, ki jih je izrazil ta proizvajalec, niso šteli za utemeljene, njegove trditve pa so bile zavrnjene.
It has been established that the Union industry suffered material injury caused by the dumped imports from India.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je industrija Unije zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz Indije utrpela znatno škodo.
It is recalled that the Union industry could not fully benefit from the growing consumption and the financial situation of the Union industry remained fragile.
Spomniti je treba, da industrija Unije ni mogla v celoti izkoristiti naraščajoče potrošnje in da je finančni položaj industrije Unije ostal negotov.
It is expected that the imposition of anti-dumping duties will restore fair trade conditions on the Union market, allowing the Union industry to align its prices of the like product to the costs of production.
Pričakuje se, da se bodo z uvedbo protidampinških dajatev znova vzpostavili pravični pogoji trgovanja na trgu Unije, kar bo industriji Unije omogočilo uskladitev cen podobnega izdelka s proizvodnimi stroški.
It can also be expected that the imposition of measures will enable the Union industry to regain at least part of the market share lost during the period considered, with a positive impact on its profitability and overall financial situation.
Pričakuje se lahko tudi, da se bo z uvedbo ukrepov industriji Unije omogočila povrnitev vsaj dela tržnega deleža, ki ga je izgubila v obravnavanem obdobju, kar bi pozitivno vplivalo na njeno dobičkonosnost in splošni finančni položaj.
The imposition of measures would enable the industry to maintain and further develop its efforts to be cost efficient.
Uvedba ukrepov bi industriji omogočila, da ohrani in nadalje razvija svoja prizadevanja za stroškovno učinkovitost.
Should measures not be imposed, further losses in market share could be expected and the Union industry’s profitability would deteriorate.
Če se ukrepi ne uvedejo, je pričakovati nadaljnje izgube tržnega deleža, dobičkonosnost industrije Unije pa bi se poslabšala.
It is, therefore, provisionally concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping measures on imports originating in India would be in the interest of the Union industry.
Zato se začasno sklene, da bi bila uvedba protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz iz Indije v interesu industrije Unije.
Questionnaires were sent to nine users in the Union.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani devetim uporabnikom v Uniji.
On average, purchases from India constituted around 67 % of their total purchases of the product concerned, and India represented the exclusive source of supply only for one user.
V povprečju so nakupi izdelkov iz Indije predstavljali približno 67 % njihovih celotnih nakupov zadevnega izdelka, le za enega od uporabnikov pa je bila Indija edini vir dobave.
During the IP, the average percentage of the turnover incorporating the product concerned represented 54 % of their total turnover.
V OP je povprečni delež prometa, ki vključuje zadevni izdelek, predstavljal 54 % njihovega celotnega prometa.
The investigation showed that, during the IP, the average profitability of all cooperating users in the sectors which use the product concerned was above 9 % on turnover.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bila povprečna dobičkonosnost vseh sodelujočih uporabnikov v sektorjih, ki uporabljajo zadevni izdelek, v OP nad 9-odstotnim dobičkom od prometa.
The likely effect of the proposed measures was assessed on the basis of questionnaire replies received from the users and the total Union market for the product concerned and the like product.
Verjeten učinek predlaganih ukrepov je bil ocenjen na podlagi izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, ki so jih predložili uporabniki, in celotnega trga Unije za zadevni in podobni izdelek.
Assuming the worst case scenario for the Union market, i.e. that no price increase could be passed on to the distribution chain and that the users would continue purchasing from India in previous volumes, the impact of the duty on the users’ profitability would mean a decrease of around 1,2 percentage points.
Ob predpostavki najslabšega možnega primera za trg Unije, tj. da povišanja cen ne bo mogoče prenesti na distribucijsko verigo in da bodo uporabniki še naprej kupovali izdelke iz Indije v enakih količinah kot prej, bi učinek dajatve na dobičkonosnost uporabnikov pomenil zmanjšanje za približno 1,2 odstotne točke.
It has to be noted that one user had a neutral position regarding the investigation because it considers that the imposition of measures will have no significant effect on the market prices as the potential price increase would be absorbed by the distributors.
Opozoriti je treba, da je imel eden od uporabnikov nevtralno stališče glede preiskave, saj meni, da uvedba ukrepov ne bo znatno vplivala na tržne cene, saj bi morebitno povišanje cen absorbirali distributerji.
Another user expressed concerns that, if imposed, measures would hit also certain product types that are no longer produced in the Union.
Drug uporabnik je izrazil zaskrbljenost, da bodo ukrepi, če bodo uvedeni, vplivali tudi na nekatere vrste izdelkov, ki se v Uniji ne proizvajajo več.
The investigation showed, however that the product types referred to by the said user are still produced in the Union and that the demand of those types of stainless steel grades is not significant.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da se vrste izdelkov, ki jih je navedel zadevni uporabnik, v Uniji še vedno proizvajajo in da povpraševanje po navedenih vrstah nerjavnega jekla ni veliko.