natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a summary of the subject-matter of the dispute and the relevant findings of fact as determined by the referring court or tribunal, or, at least, an account of the facts on which the questions are based;
povzetek predmeta spora in upoštevnih dejstev, kakor jih je ugotovilo predložitveno sodišče, ali vsaj navedbo dejanskih okoliščin, na katerih vprašanja temeljijo;
the tenor of any national provisions applicable in the case and, where appropriate, the relevant national case-law;
vsebino nacionalnih določb, ki naj bi se uporabile v obravnavani zadevi, in po potrebi upoštevno nacionalno sodno prakso;
a statement of the reasons which prompted the referring court or tribunal to inquire about the interpretation or validity of certain provisions of European Union law, and the relationship between those provisions and the national legislation applicable to the main proceedings.
razloge, ki so predložitvenemu sodišču vzbudili dvom glede razlage ali veljavnosti nekaterih določb prava Unije, in pojasnitev zveze, ki po mnenju predložitvenega sodišča obstaja med temi določbami in nacionalno zakonodajo, ki jo je treba uporabiti v sporu o glavni stvari.
Anonymity
Anonimnost
Where anonymity has been granted by the referring court or tribunal, the Court shall respect that anonymity in the proceedings pending before it.
Če je anonimnost zagotovilo predložitveno sodišče, Sodišče to anonimnost spoštuje v postopku, ki poteka pred njim.
At the request of the referring court or tribunal, at the duly reasoned request of a party to the main proceedings or of its own motion, the Court may also, if it considers it necessary, render anonymous one or more persons or entities concerned by the case.
Poleg tega lahko Sodišče na zahtevo predložitvenega sodišča, na ustrezno obrazložen predlog stranke v sporu o glavni stvari ali po uradni dolžnosti eni ali več osebam ali subjektom, ki jih spor zadeva, zagotovi anonimnost, če presodi, da je to potrebno.
Participation in preliminary ruling proceedings
Udeležba v postopku predhodnega odločanja
Pursuant to Article 23 of the Statute, the following shall be authorised to submit observations to the Court:
V skladu s členom 23 Statuta lahko Sodišču predložijo stališča:
the parties to the main proceedings,
stranke v sporu o glavni stvari,
the Member States,
države članice,
the institution which adopted the act the validity or interpretation of which is in dispute,
institucija, ki je sprejela akt, katerega veljavnost ali razlaga je sporna,
the States, other than the Member States, which are parties to the EEA Agreement, and also the EFTA Surveillance Authority, where a question concerning one of the fields of application of that Agreement is referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling,
države podpisnice Sporazuma o EGP, ki niso države članice, ter Nadzorni organ EFTA, če je Sodišču v predhodno odločanje predloženo vprašanje, ki zadeva eno od področij uporabe tega sporazuma,
non-Member States which are parties to an agreement relating to a specific subject-matter, concluded with the Council, where the agreement so provides and where a court or tribunal of a Member State refers to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling a question falling within the scope of that agreement.
tretje države podpisnice sporazuma glede določenega področja, sklenjenega s Svetom, če sporazum to določa in če sodišče države članice Sodišču v predhodno odločanje predloži vprašanje, ki zadeva področje uporabe tega sporazuma.
Non-participation in the written part of the procedure does not preclude participation in the oral part of the procedure.
Neudeležba pri pisnem delu postopka ni ovira za udeležbo pri ustnem delu postopka.
Parties to the main proceedings
Stranke v sporu o glavni stvari
The parties to the main proceedings are those who are determined as such by the referring court or tribunal in accordance with national rules of procedure.
Stranke v sporu o glavni stvari so tiste, ki jih kot take v skladu z nacionalnimi postopkovnimi pravili določi predložitveno sodišče.
Where the referring court or tribunal informs the Court that a new party has been admitted to the main proceedings, when the proceedings before the Court are already pending, that party must accept the case as he finds it at the time when the Court was so informed.
Če predložitveno sodišče obvesti Sodišče o vstopu nove stranke v postopek v glavni stvari, postopek pred Sodiščem pa že poteka, sprejme ta stranka postopek v tistem stanju, v katerem je ob tej obvestitvi.
That party shall receive a copy of every procedural document already served on the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Tej stranki se pošljejo vsi procesni akti, ki so že bili vročeni zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 23 Statuta.
As regards the representation and attendance of the parties to the main proceedings, the Court shall take account of the rules of procedure in force before the court or tribunal which made the reference.
Sodišče glede zastopanja in navzočnosti strank v sporu o glavni stvari upošteva postopkovna pravila, ki se uporabljajo pred sodiščem, ki mu je predložilo zadevo v odločanje.
In the event of any doubt as to whether a person may under national law represent a party to the main proceedings, the Court may obtain information from the referring court or tribunal on the rules of procedure applicable.
V dvomu glede tega, ali lahko neka oseba na podlagi nacionalnega prava zastopa stranko v postopku v glavni stvari, lahko Sodišče informacije o postopkovnih pravilih, ki jih je treba uporabiti, dobi od predložitvenega sodišča.
Translation and service of the request for a preliminary ruling
Prevod in vročitev predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe
The requests for a preliminary ruling referred to in this Title shall be served on the Member States in the original version, accompanied by a translation into the official language of the State to which they are being addressed.
Predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe iz tega naslova se vročijo državam članicam v izvirniku skupaj s prevodom v uradnem jeziku države naslovnice.
Where appropriate, on account of the length of the request, such translation shall be replaced by the translation into the official language of the State to which it is addressed of a summary of that request, which will serve as a basis for the position to be adopted by that State.
Če je zaradi dolžine predloga to potrebno, se namesto navedenega prevoda vroči prevod povzetka tega predloga v uradnem jeziku države naslovnice, ki bo podlaga za stališče te države.
The summary shall include the full text of the question or questions referred for a preliminary ruling.
Povzetek vključuje celotno besedilo vprašanja oziroma vprašanj, predloženih v predhodno odločanje.
That summary shall contain, in particular, in so far as that information appears in the request for a preliminary ruling, the subject-matter of the main proceedings, the essential arguments of the parties to those proceedings, a succinct presentation of the reasons for the reference for a preliminary ruling and the case-law and the provisions of national law and European Union law relied on.
Ta povzetek vsebuje, če so ti elementi v predlogu za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, zlasti predmet spora o glavni stvari, bistvene trditve strank v tem sporu, strnjeno predstavitev obrazložitve predložitvene odločbe ter sodno prakso in določbe nacionalnega prava in prava Unije, na katere se sklicuje.
In the cases covered by the third paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute, the requests for a preliminary ruling shall be served on the States, other than the Member States, which are parties to the EEA Agreement and also on the EFTA Surveillance Authority in the original version, accompanied by a translation of the request, or where appropriate of a summary, into one of the languages referred to in Article 36, to be chosen by the addressee.
V primerih iz člena 23, tretji odstavek, Statuta se predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe vročijo državam podpisnicam Sporazuma o EGP, ki niso države članice, in Nadzornemu organu EFTA v izvirniku skupaj s prevodom predloga oziroma po potrebi povzetka v enega od jezikov iz člena 36, ki ga izbere naslovnik.
Where a non-Member State has the right to take part in preliminary ruling proceedings pursuant to the fourth paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute, the original version of the request for a preliminary ruling shall be served on it accompanied by a translation of the request, or where appropriate of a summary, into one of the languages referred to in Article 36, to be chosen by the non-Member State concerned.
Kadar ima tretja država pravico, da se v skladu s členom 23, četrti odstavek, Statuta udeleži postopka predhodnega odločanja, se ji predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe vroči v izvirniku skupaj s prevodom odločbe oziroma po potrebi povzetka v enega od jezikov iz člena 36, ki ga izbere zadevna tretja država.
Reply by reasoned order
Odgovor z obrazloženim sklepom
Where a question referred to the Court for a preliminary ruling is identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled, where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law or where the answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling admits of no reasonable doubt, the Court may at any time, on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, decide to rule by reasoned order.
Če je vprašanje, predloženo Sodišču v predhodno odločanje, enako vprašanju, o katerem je Sodišče že odločalo, če je iz sodne prakse mogoče jasno sklepati, kakšen je odgovor na tako vprašanje, ali če odgovor na vprašanje, predloženo v predhodno odločanje, ne dopušča nobenega razumnega dvoma, lahko Sodišče na predlog sodnika poročevalca in po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca kadar koli odloči z obrazloženim sklepom.
Circumstances in which the Court remains seised
Postopek pred Sodiščem
The Court shall remain seised of a request for a preliminary ruling for as long as it is not withdrawn by the court or tribunal which made that request to the Court.
Postopek o predlogu za sprejetje predhodne odločbe pred Sodiščem teče, dokler sodišče, ki mu ga je predložilo, predloga ne umakne.
The withdrawal of a request may be taken into account until notice of the date of delivery of the judgment has been served on the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Umik predloga se lahko upošteva, preden je dan razglasitve sodbe sporočen zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 23 Statuta.
However, the Court may at any time declare that the conditions of its jurisdiction are no longer fulfilled.
Vendar lahko Sodišče kadar koli ugotovi, da niso več izpolnjeni pogoji za njegovo pristojnost.
Request for clarification
Zahteva za podrobnejše podatke
Without prejudice to the measures of organisation of procedure and measures of inquiry provided for in these Rules, the Court may, after hearing the Advocate General, request clarification from the referring court or tribunal within a time-limit prescribed by the Court.
Brez poseganja v ukrepe procesnega vodstva in pripravljalne ukrepe, ki jih določa ta poslovnik, lahko Sodišče po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca od predložitvenega sodišča zahteva, naj v roku, ki ga določi, predloži podrobnejše podatke.
The reply of the referring court or tribunal to that request shall be served on the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Odgovor predložitvenega sodišča na to zahtevo se vroči zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 23 Statuta.
Costs of the preliminary ruling proceedings
Stroški postopka predhodnega odločanja
It shall be for the referring court or tribunal to decide as to the costs of the preliminary ruling proceedings.
O stroških postopka predhodnega odločanja odloči predložitveno sodišče.
Rectification of judgments and orders
Poprava sodb in sklepov
Clerical mistakes, errors in calculation and obvious inaccuracies affecting judgments or orders may be rectified by the Court, of its own motion or at the request of an interested person referred to in Article 23 of the Statute made within two weeks after delivery of the judgment or service of the order.
Sodišče lahko po uradni dolžnosti ali na predlog zainteresiranega subjekta iz člena 23 Statuta, če je podan v dveh tednih od razglasitve sodbe ali vročitve sklepa, popravi pisne in računske pomote ter očitne pomanjkljivosti v sodbah in sklepih.
The Court shall take its decision after hearing the Advocate General.
Sodišče odloča po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca.
The original of the rectification order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified decision.
Izvirnik popravnega sklepa se priloži izvirniku popravljene odločbe.
Interpretation of preliminary rulings
Razlaga predhodnih odločb
Article 158 of these Rules relating to the interpretation of judgments and orders shall not apply to decisions given in reply to a request for a preliminary ruling.
Člen 158 tega poslovnika, ki se nanaša na razlago sodb in sklepov, se ne uporablja za odločbe, izdane v odgovor na predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe.
It shall be for the national courts or tribunals to assess whether they consider that sufficient guidance is given by a preliminary ruling, or whether it appears to them that a further reference to the Court is required.
Za presojo, ali je bilo nacionalno sodišče s predhodno odločbo dovolj poučeno oziroma ali je treba Sodišču ponovno predložiti predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, je pristojno prvo.
EXPEDITED PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE
HITRI POSTOPEK PREDHODNEGA ODLOČANJA
Expedited procedure
Hitri postopek
At the request of the referring court or tribunal or, exceptionally, of his own motion, the President of the Court may, where the nature of the case requires that it be dealt with within a short time, after hearing the Judge-Rapporteur and the Advocate General, decide that a reference for a preliminary ruling is to be determined pursuant to an expedited procedure derogating from the provisions of these Rules.
Če je treba zadevo zaradi njene narave obravnavati v kar najkrajšem času, lahko predsednik Sodišča na predlog predložitvenega sodišča ali izjemoma po uradni dolžnosti po opredelitvi sodnika poročevalca in generalnega pravobranilca odloči, da se z odstopanjem od določb tega poslovnika predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe obravnava po hitrem postopku.
In that event, the President shall immediately fix the date for the hearing, which shall be communicated to the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute when the request for a preliminary ruling is served.
V tem primeru predsednik nemudoma določi dan obravnave, ki se sporoči zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 23 Statuta ob vročitvi predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe.
The interested persons referred to in the preceding paragraph may lodge statements of case or written observations within a time-limit prescribed by the President, which shall not be less than 15 days.
Zainteresirani subjekti iz prejšnjega odstavka lahko v roku, ki ga določi predsednik in znaša najmanj 15 dni, vložijo vloge ali pisna stališča.
The President may request those interested persons to restrict the matters addressed in their statement of case or written observations to the essential points of law raised by the request for a preliminary ruling.
Predsednik jih lahko pozove, naj vloge ali pisna stališča omejijo le na bistvena pravna vprašanja, ki jih načenja predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe.
The statements of case or written observations, if any, shall be communicated to all the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute prior to the hearing.
Morebitne vloge ali pisna stališča se vsem zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 23 Statuta pošljejo pred obravnavo.
The Court shall rule after hearing the Advocate General.
Sodišče odloča po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca.
Transmission of procedural documents
Posredovanje procesnih aktov
The procedural documents referred to in the preceding Article shall be deemed to have been lodged on the transmission to the Registry, by telefax or any other technical means of communication available to the Court, of a copy of the signed original and the items and documents relied on in support of it, together with the schedule referred to in Article 57(4).
Šteje se, da so procesni akti iz prejšnjega člena vloženi, ko je sodnemu tajništvu – po telefaksu ali katerem drugem tehničnem sredstvu sporočanja, ki je na voljo Sodišču – posredovan prepis podpisanega izvirnika ter dokazil in dokumentov, na katere se procesni akt sklicuje, skupaj s seznamom iz člena 57(4).
The original of the document and the annexes referred to above shall be sent to the Registry immediately.
Izvirnik akta in zgoraj navedenih prilog se takoj posredujejo sodnemu tajništvu.
Where the preceding Article requires that a document be served on or communicated to a person, such service or communication may be effected by transmission of a copy of the document by telefax or any other technical means of communication available to the Court and the addressee.
Vročitve, sporočitve in poslanja iz prejšnjega člena se lahko opravijo s posredovanjem prepisa dokumenta po telefaksu ali katerem drugem tehničnem sredstvu sporočanja, ki je na voljo Sodišču in naslovniku.
URGENT PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE
NUJNI POSTOPEK PREDHODNEGA ODLOČANJA
Scope of the urgent preliminary ruling procedure
Področje uporabe nujnega postopka predhodnega odločanja
A reference for a preliminary ruling which raises one or more questions in the areas covered by Title V of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union may, at the request of the referring court or tribunal or, exceptionally, of the Court’s own motion, be dealt with under an urgent procedure derogating from the provisions of these Rules.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, v katerem se zastavlja eno ali več vprašanj glede področij iz naslova V tretjega dela Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, se lahko na predlog predložitvenega sodišča ali izjemoma po uradni dolžnosti obravnava po nujnem postopku, ki odstopa od določb tega poslovnika.
The referring court or tribunal shall set out the matters of fact and law which establish the urgency and justify the application of that exceptional procedure and shall, in so far as possible, indicate the answer that it proposes to the questions referred.
Predložitveno sodišče navede pravne in dejanske okoliščine, iz katerih izhaja nujnost in ki upravičujejo uporabo tega posebnega postopka, ter predlaga, kolikor je to mogoče, odgovor na vprašanja za predhodno odločanje.
If the referring court or tribunal has not submitted a request for the urgent procedure to be applied, the President of the Court may, if the application of that procedure appears, prima facie, to be required, ask the Chamber referred to in Article 108 to consider whether it is necessary to deal with the reference under that procedure.
Če predložitveno sodišče ni podalo predloga za uporabo nujnega postopka, lahko predsednik Sodišča, če je že na prvi pogled jasno, da je treba uporabiti ta postopek, senatu iz člena 108 naloži, naj preuči, ali je treba predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe obravnavati po nujnem postopku.
Decision as to urgency
Odločitev o nujnosti
The decision to deal with a reference for a preliminary ruling under the urgent procedure shall be taken by the designated Chamber, acting on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General.
Odločitev o tem, da se predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe obravnava po nujnem postopku, sprejme določeni senat na predlog sodnika poročevalca in po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca.
The composition of that Chamber shall be determined in accordance with Article 28(2) on the day on which the case is assigned to the Judge-Rapporteur if the application of the urgent procedure is requested by the referring court or tribunal, or, if the application of that procedure is considered at the request of the President of the Court, on the day on which that request is made.
Sestava senata se določi v skladu s členom 28(2), in sicer na dan dodelitve zadeve sodniku poročevalcu, če je uporabo nujnega postopka predlagalo predložitveno sodišče, oziroma če se o uporabi tega postopka presoja na podlagi zahteve predsednika Sodišča, na dan, ko je predsednik Sodišča to zahteval.
If the case is connected with a pending case assigned to a Judge-Rapporteur who is not a member of the designated Chamber, that Chamber may propose to the President of the Court that the case be assigned to that Judge-Rapporteur.
Če je zadeva povezana z zadevo, o kateri že teče postopek in ki je bila dodeljena sodniku poročevalcu, ki ni v določenem senatu, lahko ta senat predsedniku Sodišča predlaga, naj zadevo dodeli temu sodniku poročevalcu.
Where the case is reassigned to that Judge-Rapporteur, the Chamber of five Judges which includes him shall carry out the duties of the designated Chamber in respect of that case.
Če je zadeva predodeljena temu sodniku poročevalcu, senat petih sodnikov, ki mu ta sodnik poročevalec pripada, v tej zadevi opravlja naloge določenega senata.
Article 29(1) shall apply.
Uporablja se člen 29(1).
Written part of the urgent procedure
Pisni del nujnega postopka
A request for a preliminary ruling shall, where the referring court or tribunal has requested the application of the urgent procedure or where the President has requested the designated Chamber to consider whether it is necessary to deal with the reference under that procedure, be served forthwith by the Registrar on the parties to the main proceedings, on the Member State from which the reference is made, on the European Commission and on the institution which adopted the act the validity or interpretation of which is in dispute.
Če je predložitveno sodišče predlagalo uporabo nujnega postopka ali če je predsednik določenemu senatu naložil, naj preuči, ali je treba predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe obravnavati po nujnem postopku, sodni tajnik poskrbi, da se predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe nemudoma vroči strankam v sporu o glavni stvari, državi članici, v kateri je predložitveno sodišče, Evropski komisiji in instituciji, ki je sprejela akt, katerega veljavnost ali razlaga je sporna.
The decision as to whether or not to deal with the reference for a preliminary ruling under the urgent procedure shall be served immediately on the referring court or tribunal and on the parties, Member State and institutions referred to in the preceding paragraph.
Odločba o obravnavanju ali o neobravnavanju predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe po nujnem postopku se nemudoma vroči predložitvenemu sodišču ter strankam, državi članici in institucijama, navedenima v prejšnjem odstavku.
The decision to deal with the reference under the urgent procedure shall prescribe the time-limit within which those parties or entities may lodge statements of case or written observations.
V odločbi o obravnavanju predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe po nujnem postopku se določi rok, v katerem lahko te vložijo vloge ali pisna stališča.
The decision may specify the matters of law to which such statements of case or written observations must relate and may specify the maximum length of those documents.
V odločbi se lahko opredelijo pravna vprašanja, na katera se morajo te vloge ali pisna stališča nanašati, in lahko se določi dopustna dolžina teh vlog ali pisnih stališč.
Where a request for a preliminary ruling refers to an administrative procedure or judicial proceedings conducted in a Member State other than that from which the reference is made, the Court may invite that first Member State to provide all relevant information in writing or at the hearing.
Če se predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe sklicuje na upravni ali sodni postopek, ki je potekal v drugi državi članici od te, v kateri je predložitveno sodišče, lahko Sodišče to državo članico pozove, naj pisno ali na obravnavi predloži vsa koristna pojasnila.