natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The following entries shall be added under the heading ‘B. LEGAL PERSONS, ENTITIES AND BODIES’:
Pod naslov „B. PRAVNE OSEBE, SUBJEKTI IN ORGANI“ se dodata naslednja vnosa:
‘Forces Democratiques De Liberation Du Rwanda (alias (a) FDLR, (b) Force Combattante Abacunguzi, (c) FOCA, (d) Combatant Force for the Liberation of Rwanda). E-mail addresses: Fdlr@fmx.de; fldrrse@yahoo.fr; fdlr@gmx.net. Location: North and South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Date of designation referred to in Article 5(1)(b): 31.12.2012.’
„Forces Democratiques De Liberation Du Rwanda (tudi (a) FDLR, (b) Force Combattante Abacunguzi, (c) FOCA, (d) Combatant Force for the Liberation of Rwanda). E-naslovi: Fdlr@fmx.de; fldrrse@yahoo.fr; fdlr@gmx.net. Lokacija: Severni in Južni Kivu, Demokratična republika Kongo. Datum določitve iz člena 5(1)(b): 31.12.2012.“
‘M23 (alias Mouvement Du 23 Mars). Date of designation referred to in Article 5(1)(b): 31.12.2012.’
„M23 (tudi Mouvement Du 23 Mars). Datum določitve iz člena 5(1)(b): 31.12.2012.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 54/2013
Council Regulation (EU) No 55/2013
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 55/2013
concerning the extension of the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1214/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the professional cross-border transport of euro cash by road between euro area Member States
o razširitvi področja uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 1214/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o profesionalnem čezmejnem prevozu eurogotovine po cesti med državami članicami v euroobmočju
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 352 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 352 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju soglasja Evropskega parlamenta,
Regulation (EU) No 1214/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] aims to facilitate the cross-border transport of euro cash between Member States.
Cilj Uredbe (EU) št. 1214/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] je olajšati čezmejni prevoz eurogotovine po cesti med državami članicami.
However, that Regulation only applies to the territory of those Member States which have adopted the euro as their single currency.
Vendar se navedena uredba uporablja le na ozemlju držav članic, ki so uvedle euro kot svojo enotno valuto.
In the run-up to the euro changeover in a Member State, there is a need for euro cash to be transported from existing euro area Member States, since euro banknotes needed for the changeover are usually transported from existing euro area stocks, and euro coins are often fully or partly minted abroad.
Eurogotovino je treba prepeljati iz obstoječih držav članic euroobmočja v državo, ki se pripravlja na prevzem eura, ker se ponavadi euro bankovci, ki so potrebni za prevzem eura, vzamejo iz obstoječih zalog teh bankovcev na euroobmočju in ker se euro kovanci v celoti ali delno kujejo v tujini.
It is therefore necessary that Regulation (EU) No 1214/2011 apply also to Member States that are preparing to adopt the euro.
Zato bi se morala Uredba (EU) št. 1214/2011 uporabljati v državah članicah, ki se pripravljajo na uvedbo eura.
It should apply from the date of the decision of the Council to abrogate the derogations of the Member States concerned to participate in the euro.
Navedena uredba bi se morala začeti uporabljati z dnem odločitve Sveta o odpravi odstopanja teh držav članic zaradi prevzema eura.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to facilitate the professional cross-border transport of euro cash by road between current euro area Member States and Member States about to introduce the euro, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States due to the very detailed and diverging national regulatory regimes on the matter, and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te uredbe, torej olajšati profesionalni čezmejni prevoz eurogotovine po cesti med državami članicami v euroobmočju in državami članicami, ki bodo v bližnji prihodnosti uvedle euro, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči zaradi zelo podrobnih in različnih nacionalnih regulativnih ureditev na tem področju, in ker je ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov ukrepa lažje doseči na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective,
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenih ciljev –
Regulation (EU) No 1214/2011 shall apply to the territory of a Member State that has not yet adopted the euro as from the date of the decision of the Council to abrogate the derogation of the Member State concerned to participate in the euro, taken in accordance with Article 140(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Uredba (EU) št. 1214/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta se na ozemlju države članice, ki še ni uvedla eura, začne uporabljati z dnem odločitve Sveta o odpravi odstopanja teh držav članic zaradi prevzema eura, sprejete v skladu s členom 140(2) Pogodbe.
This Regulation shall enter into force 12 months after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati dvanajst mesecev po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Opinion of 5 October 2010 (OJ C 278, 15.10.2010, p. 1).
Mnenje z dne 5. oktobra 2010 (UL C 278, 15.10.2010, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 56/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 56/2013
amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
o spremembi prilog I in IV k Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 999/2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij
Article 7(2) of that Regulation extends that prohibition to animals other than ruminants and restricts that prohibition, as regards the feeding of those animals with products of animal origin, in accordance with Annex IV to that Regulation.
V členu 7(2) navedene uredbe je prepoved razširjena tudi na živali, ki niso prežvekovalci, prepoved krmljenja navedenih živali s proizvodi živalskega izvora pa je omejena v skladu s Prilogo IV k navedeni uredbi.
Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 extends the prohibition provided for in Article 7(1) to the feeding to non-ruminant farmed animals, with the exception of the feeding to carnivorous fur-producing animals, of, inter alia, processed animal protein (PAP).
V skladu s Prilogo IV Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001 se prepoved iz člena 7(1) razširi na krmljenje rejnih neprežvekovalcev, razen krmljenja mesojedih živali, ki se gojijo za kožuh, med drugim s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami.
By way of derogation, and under specific conditions, Annex IV authorises certain PAP to be fed to non-ruminant farmed animals.
Priloga IV z odstopanjem in pod posebnimi pogoji dovoljuje krmljenje rejnih neprežvekovalcev z določenimi predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami.
Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation) [2] prohibits the feeding of terrestrial animals of a given species other than fur animals with PAP derived from the bodies or parts of bodies of animals of the same species.
Člen 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi, ter razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 (Uredba o živalskih stranskih proizvodih) [2] prepoveduje krmljenje kopenskih živali določene vrste, ki niso kožuharji, s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, pridobljenimi iz teles ali delov teles živali iste živalske vrste.
That Article also prohibits the feeding of farmed fish with PAP derived from the bodies or parts of bodies of farmed fish of the same species.
Navedeni člen prepoveduje tudi hranjenje gojenih rib s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, pridobljenimi iz teles ali delov teles gojenih rib iste vrste.
The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — The TSE Road Map 2 — A Strategy paper on Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies for 2010-2015 [3] was adopted on 16 July 2010.
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu – Drugi časovni načrt za TSE – Strateški dokument o transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatijah za obdobje 2010–2015 [3] je bilo sprejeto 16. julija 2010.
It outlines areas where future possible changes to Union legislation on TSEs could be made.
V njem so opredeljena področja prihodnjih možnih sprememb zakonodaje Unije na področju TSE.
It also emphasises that any review of the TSE rules should be primarily driven by scientific advice and technical issues related to the control and enforcement of the new measures.
Poudarja tudi, da bi moral kateri koli pregled pravil v zvezi s TSE temeljiti predvsem na znanstvenih mnenjih in tehničnih vprašanjih v zvezi z nadzorom in izvrševanjem novih ukrepov.
That Communication, inter alia, addresses the revision of the current feed ban rules laid down in Union legislation.
Navedeno sporočilo med drugim obravnava revizijo veljavnih pravil o prepovedi krmljenja iz zakonodaje Unije.
Based on the contents of two scientific opinions issued by the Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on 24 January 2007 [4] and on 17 November 2007 [5] respectively, the Communication acknowledges that no TSE have been identified as occurring in non-ruminant farmed animals under natural conditions and that the transmission risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) from non-ruminants to non-ruminants is negligible as long as intra-species recycling is avoided.
Sporočilo na podlagi znanstvenih mnenj Odbora za biološke nevarnosti (BIOHAZ) Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) z dne 24. januarja 2007 [4] in 17. novembra 2007 [5] potrjuje, da pri rejnih neprežvekovalcih v naravnih pogojih niso bile dokazane pojavitve TSE, tveganje prenosa goveje spongiformne encefalopatije (BSE) z neprežvekovalca na neprežvekovalca pa je zanemarljivo, če se prepreči recikliranje znotraj iste vrste.
Consequently, the Communication concludes that a lifting of the ban on the use of PAP from non-ruminants in non-ruminant feed could be considered, but without lifting the existing prohibition on intra-species recycling and only if validated analytical techniques to determine the species origin of PAP are available and a correct channelling of PAP from different species is in place.
Sporočilo zato ugotavlja, da se lahko prouči preklic prepovedi uporabe predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz neprežvekovalcev, v krmi za neprežvekovalce, ne da bi preklicali obstoječo prepoved recikliranja znotraj iste vrste in le, če so na voljo potrjeni analitski postopki za ugotavljanje, iz katerih živalskih vrst so pridobljene predelane živalske beljakovine, ter ob izvajanju pravilnega usmerjanja predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz različnih živalskih vrst.
On 29 November 2010, the Council adopted conclusions on that Communication [6].
Svet je 29. novembra 2010 sprejel sklepe na podlagi navedenega sporočila [6].
Those conclusions recognise the fundamental importance of the ban on using PAP in feed for farmed animals in preventing the circulation of BSE via the feed chain and thus playing a key role in the reduction of the incidence of that disease in the bovine population.
V navedenih sklepih priznava temeljni pomen prepovedi uporabe predelanih živalskih beljakovin v krmi za rejne živali za preprečevanje kroženja BSE v krmni verigi, zato ima ta prepoved ključno vlogo pri zmanjševanju pojavnosti navedene bolezni v populaciji goveda.
Furthermore, those conclusions consider that it should be a prerequisite of any possible reintroduction of the use of non-ruminant PAPs to feed for other non-ruminant species that effective and validated tests are available to distinguish between PAP originating from different species and also that there has been a careful analysis of the risks of relaxation, regarding animal and public health.
Poleg tega Svet v navedenih sklepih meni, da bi morali biti za kakršno koli morebitno ponovno uporabo predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz neprežvekovalcev, za krmljenje drugih vrst neprežvekovalcev nujno potrebni učinkoviti in potrjeni testi za razlikovanje med predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, pridobljenimi iz drugih vrst, ter temeljita analiza tveganja, povezanega z omilitvijo predpisov na področju zdravja živali in javnega zdravja.
On 9 December 2010, the BIOHAZ Panel of EFSA adopted a scientific opinion on the revision of the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal proteins (PAPs) [7].
Odbor BIOHAZ agencije EFSA je 9. decembra 2010 sprejel znanstveno mnenje o reviziji kvantitativne ocene tveganja o tveganju za BSE, ki ga predstavljajo predelane živalske beljakovine [7].
European Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on the EU protein deficit: what solution for a long-standing problem [8], calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal to the Parliament and the Council authorising the use of PAP from slaughtered offal for the production of feed for monogastric animals (pigs and poultry), provided that the ingredients stem from meat which was approved for human consumption, and that the ban on intra-species recycling and forced cannibalism is fully implemented and controlled.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. marca 2011 o pomanjkanju beljakovin v EU: kako rešiti ta dolgotrajni problem? [8] poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu in Svetu predloži zakonodajni predlog, ki dovoljuje uporabo predelanih živalskih beljakovin iz klavničnih odpadkov za proizvodnjo krme za monogastrične živali (prašiče in perutnino), pod pogojem, da sestavine izhajajo iz mesa, ki je bilo odobreno za prehrano ljudi, in da se v celoti izvaja in nadzira prepoved recikliranja znotraj iste živalske vrste in prisilnega kanibalizma.
European Parliament resolution of 6 July 2011 on EU legislation on Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE) and on related feed and food controls — implementation and outlook [9] supports, particularly in the light of the existing protein deficit in the Union, the Commission intention to remove the feed ban provisions in Union legislation banning the feeding of PAP to non-ruminants, provided that it applies to non-herbivores, and under certain conditions.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. julija 2011 o zakonodaji EU o transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatijah (TSE) in o s tem povezanem nadzoru krme in živil – izvajanje in obeti [9] podpira, zlasti zaradi trenutnega pomanjkanja beljakovin v Uniji, namen Komisije, da prekliče določbe o prepovedi krmljenja iz zakonodaje Unije, ki prepovedujejo krmljenje neprežvekovalcev s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, pod pogojem, da to velja samo za nerastlinojedce in pod določenimi pogoji.
That resolution calls for the production and sterilisation methods used for processed animal protein to comply with highest safety standards and with the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 and the use of the latest and safest technology available.
Navedena resolucija poziva, da so proizvodne in sterilizacijske metode, ki se uporabljajo za predelane živalske beljakovine, v skladu z najstrožjimi varnostnimi standardi in s pravili iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009, ter da se uporablja najnovejša in najvarnejša razpoložljiva tehnologija.
It calls for the existing prohibitions on intra-species recycling to remain in place, that production channels of PAP derived from different species be completely separated, and that the separation of such production channels be controlled by the competent authorities in the Member States and audited by the Commission.
Poziva, da sedanje prepovedi recikliranja znotraj iste živalske vrste ostanejo v veljavi, da so proizvodne poti predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz različnih vrst, popolnoma ločene in da ločevanje teh proizvodnih poti nadzirajo pristojni organi v državah članicah, pregleduje pa jih Komisija.
In addition, it states that before the lifting of the feed ban is implemented, a reliable species specific method is in place to identify the species origin of the proteins in animal feed containing PAP so that intra-species recycling and the presence of PAP can be excluded, that the production of PAP from category 1 or category 2 material be prohibited and that only category 3 material fit for human consumption be used for the production of PAP.
Poleg tega ta resolucija poziva, da se pred ukinitvijo prepovedi krmljenja zagotovi zanesljiva metoda za posamezne živalske vrste, s katero je mogoče ugotoviti, iz katere živalske vrste izvirajo beljakovine v živalski krmi, ki vsebuje predelane živalske beljakovine, tako da je recikliranje znotraj iste vrste in prisotnost predelanih živalskih beljakovin mogoče izključiti, da se proizvodnja predelanih živalskih beljakovin iz snovi kategorije 1 ali kategorije 2 prepove ter da se za proizvodnjo predelanih živalskih beljakovin uporabljajo le snovi kategorije 3, ki so primerne za prehrano ljudi.
That resolution rejects the use of PAP derived from non-ruminants or ruminants in feed for ruminants.
Navedena resolucija zavrača uporabo predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz neprežvekovalcev ali prežvekovalcev, v krmi za prežvekovalce.
On 9 March 2012, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Animal Proteins in feedingstuffs (EURL-AP) validated a new diagnostic DNA-based method which is able to detect very low level of ruminant material that may be present in feed [10].
Referenčni laboratorij Evropske unije za živalske beljakovine v krmi je 9. marca 2012 potrdil novo diagnostično metodo na podlagi DNA, ki v krmi omogoča odkrivanje zelo majhnih količin snovi, pridobljenih iz prežvekovalcev [10].
That method can be used for performing routine controls on PAP and compound feed containing PAP in order to verify the absence of proteins of ruminant origin.
Navedena metoda se lahko uporablja za redni nadzor predelanih živalskih beljakovin in krmnih mešanic, ki vsebujejo predelane živalske beljakovine, da se zagotovi odsotnost beljakovin, pridobljenih iz prežvekovalcev.
There is currently no diagnostic method validated which is able to detect the presence of porcine or poultry material in feed.
Trenutno ni na voljo nobena potrjena diagnostična metoda, ki bi omogočala odkrivanje snovi prašičev ali perutnine v krmi.
Therefore, it would not be possible to control the correct implementation of the prohibition on intra-species recycling should the use of PAP of porcine origin in poultry feed and the use of poultry PAPs in pig feed be reauthorised.
Zato nadzor pravilnega izvajanja prepovedi recikliranja znotraj iste vrste ne bi bil mogoč, če bi bila ponovno dovoljena uporaba predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz prašičev, v krmi za perutnino, in uporaba predelanih živalskih beljakovin, pridobljenih iz perutnine, v krmi za prašiče.
Aquaculture production does not present any concern regarding compliance with the intra-species recycling ban as current channelling requirements for the use of fishmeal in feed for aquaculture animals have already proven to be effective.
Proizvodnja iz ribogojstva ni zaskrbljujoča glede ravnanja skladno s prepovedjo recikliranja znotraj iste vrste, ker so se veljavne zahteve usmerjanja za uporabo ribje moke v krmi za živali iz ribogojstva že izkazale za učinkovite.
With the exception of fishmeal and compound feed containing fishmeal, which are already permitted for feeding non-ruminant animals, PAP from non-ruminant animals and feedingstuffs containing such PAP should therefore be reauthorised for feeding aquaculture animals.
Treba bi bilo ponovno dovoliti krmljenje živali iz ribogojstva s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, pridobljenimi iz neprežvekovalcev, in krmo, ki vsebuje navedene predelane živalske beljakovine, razen ribje moke in krmne mešanice, ki vsebuje ribjo moko, ki sta že dovoljeni za krmljenje neprežvekovalcev.
Strict requirements during the collection, transport and processing of those products should apply in order to avoid any risk of cross-contamination with ruminant protein.
Med zbiranjem, prevozom in predelavo teh proizvodov bi morale veljati stroge zahteve, da se prepreči vsako tveganje navzkrižne kontaminacije z beljakovinami prežvekovalcev.
In addition, regular sampling and analysis of the PAP and the compound feed containing this PAP should be performed in order to verify the absence of cross-contamination with ruminant proteins.
Poleg tega je treba izvajati redno vzorčenje in analizo predelanih živalskih beljakovin ter krmnih mešanic, ki vsebujejo te predelane živalske beljakovine, da se zagotovi odsotnost navzkrižne kontaminacije z beljakovinami prežvekovalcev.
The prohibition to feed aquaculture animals with PAP from non-ruminant animals as laid down in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should therefore be deleted.
Prepoved krmljenja živali iz ribogojstva s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, pridobljenimi iz neprežvekovalcev, kakor jo predpisuje Priloga IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001, bi bilo zato treba črtati.
In the interests of clarity of Union legislation, it is appropriate to replace the whole Annex IV by the Annex IV set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Zaradi jasnosti zakonodaje Unije je ustrezno, da se cela Priloga IV nadomesti s Prilogo IV iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Point 1 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 refers to definitions of feedingstuffs and animal by-products not intended for human consumption set out in Union legal acts that have since been repealed.
Točka 1 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 se nanaša na opredelitve krme in živalskih stranskih proizvodov, ki niso namenjeni za prehrano ljudi, iz pravnih aktov Unije, ki so bili medtem razveljavljeni.
For the sake of clarity of Union legislation, those references should be replaced by references to the respective definitions contained in legal acts in force.
Ta sklicevanja bi bilo treba zaradi jasnosti zakonodaje Unije nadomestiti s sklicevanji na ustrezne opredelitve iz veljavnih pravnih aktov.
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 should therefore be amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogo I k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 bi bilo zato treba spremeniti v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
As Member States and the economic operators of the feeding sector need sufficient time to adapt their control procedures to the new requirements introduced by this Regulation, this Regulation should not apply immediately after its entry into force.
Države članice in gospodarski subjekti v sektorju krme potrebujejo dovolj časa, da svoje nadzorne postopke prilagodijo novim zahtevam, ki jih uvaja ta uredba, zato se ta uredba ne bi smela uporabljala takoj po začetku veljavnosti uredbe.
Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogi I in IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 se spremenita v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards on a request from the European Parliament on the assessment of the health risks of feeding of ruminants with fishmeal in relation to the risk of TSE, The EFSA Journal (2007), 443, 1-26.
Mnenje Znanstvenega odbora za biološke nevarnosti na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta o oceni tveganja za zdravje prežvekovalcev pri krmljenju z ribjo moko v zvezi s tveganjem prenosa TSE, EFSA Journal (2007), 443, 1–26.