natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, as a consequence of the outbreak of HPAI, territory ZA-2 of South Africa no longer complies with the animal health conditions for applying 'treatment A' to commodities consisting of, or containing meat of farmed ratites or treated stomachs, bladders and intestines of ratites for human consumption listed in Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC and for applying 'treatment E' to biltong/jerky and pasteurised meat products consisting of, or containing meat of poultry, farmed feathered game, ratites and wild game birds, listed in Part 3 of that Annex.
Poleg tega zaradi izbruha HPAI ozemlje ZA-2 Južne Afrike več ne izpolnjuje pogojev zdravstvenega stanja živali za uporabo „obdelave A“ za blago, narejeno iz mesa gojenih ratitov ali obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev ratitov, namenjenih prehrani ljudi, ali blago, ki vsebuje take proizvode, s seznama v delu 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES in za uporabo „obdelave E“ za na soncu sušene mesne rezine (biltong) in pasterizirane mesne izdelke, narejene iz mesa perutnine, gojene pernate divjadi, ratitov in divjih ptic, ali izdelke, ki tako meso vsebujejo, s seznama v delu 3 navedene priloge.
Those treatments are insufficient to eliminate animal health risks linked to those commodities.
Navedeni obdelavi ne zadoščata za odpravo tveganj za zdravje živali, povezanih z navedenim blagom.
The entry for South Africa as regards territory ZA-2 in Part 1 Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC and the entries for South Africa in Parts 2 and 3 of that Annex should therefore be amended, in order to provide for an adequate treatment thereof.
Vnos za Južno Afriko v zvezi z ozemljem ZA-2 v delu 1 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES in vnose za Južno Afriko v delih 2 in 3 navedene Priloge je zato treba spremeniti, da se zagotovi njihova primerna obdelava.
OJ L 261, 6.10.2011, p. 19.
UL L 261, 6.10.2011, str. 19.
in Part 1, in the entry for South Africa, the entry 'ZA-2' is deleted;
V delu 1 se v vnosu za Južno Afriko črta vnos „ZA-2“.
the entry 'ZA-0' for South Africa is replaced by the following:
vnos „ZA-0“ za Južno Afriko se nadomesti z naslednjim:
the entry 'ZA-2' is deleted;
vnos „ZA-2“ se črta.
in Part 3, the entry for South Africa is replaced by the following:
V delu 3 se vnos za Južno Afriko nadomesti z naslednjim:
'ZA — South Africa
„ZA – Južna Afrika
Whole country
celotno ozemlje
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 111/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 111/2012
In Spain and Greece, Member States that together produce more than two thirds of the total olive oil production in the Union, the average olive oil price recorded on the market during the period specified in Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 826/2008 of 20 August 2008 laying down common rules for the granting of private storage aid for certain agricultural products [2], is below the level indicated in Article 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
V Španiji in Grčiji, državah članicah, ki skupaj proizvedeta več kot dve tretjini vsega oljčnega olja, proizvedenega v Uniji, je povprečna cena oljčnega olja, zabeležena na trgu v obdobju iz člena 4 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 826/2008 z dne 20. avgusta 2008 o skupnih pravilih za dodelitev pomoči za zasebno skladiščenje za nekatere kmetijske proizvode [2], pod ravnijo iz člena 33 Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007.
This causes a serious disturbance on the markets of those Member States.
To povzroča resne motnje na trgih teh držav članic.
The Union olive oil market is characterised by a high level of interdependence and therefore the serious disturbance of the Spanish and Greek market risks to propagate to all the olive oil producing Member States.
Za trg oljčnega olja v Uniji je značilna visoka raven medsebojne odvisnosti in zato obstaja nevarnost, da bi se resne motnje španskega in grškega trga razširile na vse države članice, ki proizvajajo oljčno olje.
The global quantity up to which private storage aid can be granted should be set at a level which, according to market analysis, would contribute to the stabilisation of the market.
Največjo skupno količino, ki se ji lahko dodeli pomoč za zasebno skladiščenje, je treba določiti na taki ravni, da bo v skladu z analizo trga prispevala k stabilizaciji trga.
In order to prevent uncontrolled price falls, to react swiftly to the exceptional market situation and to ensure efficient management of this measure, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Za preprečitev nenadzorovanih upadov cen, hiter odziv na izredne razmere na trgu ter zagotovitev učinkovitega upravljanja tega ukrepa, mora ta uredba začeti veljati na dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
A tendering procedure is hereby opened in order to determine the level of aid for private storage referred to in Article 31(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 for the categories of olive oil listed in the Annex to this Regulation and defined in point 1 of Annex XVI to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Začne se razpisni postopek, da se določi raven pomoči za zasebno skladiščenje iz člena 31(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 za kategorije oljčnega olja iz Priloge k tej uredbi in točke 1 Priloge XVI k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007.
The global quantity up to which aid for private storage can be granted shall be 100000 tonnes.
Največja skupna količina, ki se ji lahko dodeli pomoč za zasebno skladiščenje, je 100000 ton.
The sub-period during which tenders may be submitted in response to the first partial invitation to tender shall begin on 17 February 2012 and shall end on 21 February 2012 at 11:00 Brussels time.
Podobdobje za oddajo ponudb v odgovor na prvi delni javni razpis se začne 17. februarja 2012 in konča 21. februarja 2012 ob 11.00 po bruseljskem času.
The sub-period during which tenders may be submitted in response to the second partial invitation to tender shall begin on the first working day following the end of the preceding sub-period and shall end on 1 March 2012 at 11:00 Brussels time.
Podobdobje za oddajo ponudb v odgovor na drugi delni javni razpis se začne prvi delovni dan po izteku prejšnjega podobdobja in konča 1. marca 2012 ob 11.00 po bruseljskem času.
Tenders shall relate to a storage period of 150 days.
Ponudbe se nanašajo na obdobje skladiščenja 150 dni.
OJ L 223, 21.8.2008, p. 3
UL L 223, 21.8.2008, str. 3.
Olive oil categories referred to in Article 1(1)
Kategorije oljčnega olja iz člena 1(1)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 112/2012
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 112/2012
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 113/2012
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire [1], and in particular Article 11a(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 560/2005 z dne 12. aprila 2005 o uvedbi določenih posebnih omejevalnih ukrepov zoper nekatere osebe in subjekte glede na razmere v Slonokoščeni obali [1] ter zlasti člena 11a(2) Uredbe,
In view of the developments in Côte d’Ivoire, the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 should be amended,
Glede na razvoj dogodkov v Slonokoščeni obali bi bilo treba seznam fizičnih in pravnih oseb, subjektov ali organov iz Priloge IA k Uredbi (ES) št. 560/2005, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, spremeniti –
Council Regulation (EU) No 114/2012
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 114/2012
amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2006 o omejevalnih ukrepih v zvezi z Belorusijo
Having regard to Council Decision 2012/36/CFSP of 23 January 2012 [1] amending Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP [2] concerning restrictive measures against Belarus,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2012/36/SZVP z dne 23. januarja 2012 [1], s katerim je bil spremenjen Sklep Sveta 2010/639/SZVP [2], glede omejevalnih ukrepov proti nekaterim uradnikom Belorusije,
Having regard to the joint proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission,
ob upoštevanju skupnega predloga visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ter Evropske komisije,
Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 [3] provides for a freezing of the assets of President Lukashenko and certain officials of Belarus.
Uredba (ES) št. 765/2006 [3] določa zamrznitev sredstev predsednika Lukašenka in nekaterih uradnikov Belorusije.
By Decision 2012/36/CFSP, the Council decided that the freezing of funds and economic resources should be extended both to persons responsible for serious violations of human rights or the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, including in particular persons in a leading position and persons and entities benefiting from or supporting the Lukashenko regime, including in particular persons and entities providing financial or material support to the regime.
Svet je s Sklepom 2012/36/SZVP odločil, da je treba v ukrep zamrznitve sredstev in gospodarskih virov vključiti tako osebe, odgovorne za hujše kršitve človekovih pravic ali izvajanje represivnih ukrepov nad civilno družbo in demokratično opozicijo, zlasti osebe na vodilnih položajih ter osebe in subjekte, ki izkoriščajo ali podpirajo režim Lukašenka, kot tudi in zlasti osebe in subjekte, ki režim podpirajo finančno ali materialno.
This measure falls within the scope of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and action at the level of the Union is therefore necessary in order to give effect to it, in particular with a view to ensuring its uniform application by economic operators in all Member States.
Ta ukrep sodi na področje uporabe Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in za učinkovanje ukrepa je potreben ukrep na ravni Unije predvsem zato, da bi ukrep gospodarski subjekti v vseh državah članicah enotno izvajali.
In order to ensure that the measures provided for in this Regulation are effective, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following its publication,
Da bi se zagotovil učinek ukrepov iz te uredbe, bi morala začeti veljati dan po objavi –
Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 765/2006 se spremeni, kot sledi:
Article 2 is replaced by the following Article:
člen 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
All funds and economic resources belonging to, or owned, held or controlled by the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annexes I, IA and IB shall be frozen.
Zamrznejo se vsa sredstva in gospodarski viri, ki pripadajo fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, subjektom in organom, navedenim v prilogah I, IA in IB, so v njihovi lasti ali s katerimi ti razpolagajo ali jih nadzorujejo.
No funds or economic resources shall be made available, directly or indirectly, to or for the benefit of the natural or legal persons, entities or bodies listed in Annexes I, IA or IB.
Prepovedano je neposredno ali posredno dajati fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, subjektom ali organom iz prilog I, IA ali IB na razpolago ali v njihovo korist kakršna koli sredstva ali gospodarske vire.
Annex I shall consist of a list of the natural or legal persons, entities and bodies who, in accordance with point (a) of Article 2(1) of Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, have been identified by the Council as being responsible for the violations of international electoral standards in the Presidential elections in Belarus on 19 March 2006 and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, or as being associated with those responsible.
V Prilogi I je seznam fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, subjektov in organov, za katere je Svet v skladu s točko (a) člena 2(1) Sklepa 2010/639/SZVP z dne 25. oktobra 2010 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim uradnikom Belorusije ugotovil, da so odgovorne za kršenje mednarodnih volilnih standardov med predsedniškimi volitvami v Belorusiji 19. marca 2006 ter za izvajanje represivnih ukrepov nad civilno družbo in demokratično opozicijo ali kot z njimi povezane.
Annex IA shall consist of a list of the natural or legal persons, entities and bodies who, in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) of Decision 2010/639/CFSP, have been identified by the Council as being responsible for the violations of international electoral standards in the Presidential elections in Belarus on 19 December 2010 and the repression of civil society and democratic opposition, or as being associated with those responsible.
V Prilogi IA je seznam fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, subjektov in organov, za katere je Svet v skladu s točko (b) člena 2(1) Sklepa 2010/639/SZVP ugotovil, da so odgovorne za kršenje mednarodnih volilnih standardov med predsedniškimi volitvami v Belorusiji 19. decembra 2010 in za izvajanje represivnih ukrepov nad civilno družbo in demokratično opozicijo ali kot z njimi povezane.
Annex IB shall consist of a list of the natural or legal persons, entities and bodies who, in accordance with points (c) and (d) of Article 2(1) of Decision 2010/639/CFSP, have been identified by the Council as being either (i) responsible for serious violations of human rights or the repression of civil society and democratic opposition in Belarus, or (ii) persons or entities benefiting from or supporting the Lukashenko regime.
V Prilogi IB je seznam fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, subjektov in organov, za katere je Svet v skladu s točkama (c) in (d) člena 2(1) Sklepa 2010/639/SZVP ugotovil, da so bodisi (i) odgovorne za hujše kršitve človekovih pravic ali izvajanje represivnih ukrepov nad civilno družbo in demokratično opozicijo v Belorusiji bodisi (ii) da so osebe in subjekti, ki izkoriščajo ali podpirajo režim Lukašenka.
in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 2b, in Article 3(1)(a), in Article 4a and in paragraphs 1 and 4 of Article 8a, references to ‘Annexes I and IA’ are replaced by references to ‘Annexes I, IA and IB’.
v odstavkih 1 in 2 člena 2b se besede „V prilogah I in IA“ nadomestijo z besedami „V prilogah I, IA in IB“, v točki (a) odstavka 1 člena 3 se besede „v Prilogi I ali v Prilogi IA“ nadomestijo z besedami „v prilogah I, IA in IB“, v členu 4a se besede „v Prilogi I ali Prilogi IA“ nadomestijo z besedami „iz prilog I, IA in IB“ ter v odstavkih 1 in 4 člena 8a se besede „prilogi I ali IA“ nadomestijo z besedami „priloge I, IA in IB“.
The Annex to this Regulation shall be inserted as Annex IB to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.
Besedilo iz Priloge k tej uredbi se vstavi kot Priloga IB k Uredbi (ES) št. 765/2006.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ L 19, 24.1.2012, p. 31.
UL L 19, 24.1.2012, str. 31.
Decision of 25 October 2010 (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 18).
Sklep z dne 25. oktobra 2010 (UL L 280, 26.10.2010, str. 18).
OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 18.’;
UL L 280, 26.10.2010, str. 18.“;
There are no entries in this Annex.’.
V tej prilogi ni nobenih podatkov.“
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2012 of 11 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia
Popravek Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1241/2012 z dne 11. decembra 2012 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1138/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije in Malezije
(Official Journal of the European Union L 352 of 21 December 2012)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 352 z dne 21. decembra 2012)
On page 4, Article 1, the table, column ‘Company’:
Stran 4, člen 1, razpredelnica, stolpec „Družba“:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 115/2012
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 115/2012
imposing a provisional countervailing duty on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India
o uvedbi začasne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 12 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 12 Uredbe,
On 13 May 2011, the Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding (‘AS proceeding’) with regard to imports into the Union of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India (‘India’ or ‘the country concerned’).
Komisija je 13. maja 2011 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“), objavila začetek protisubvencijskega postopka („protisubvencijski postopek“) v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Indije („Indija“ ali „zadevna država“) v Unijo.
On the same day, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] (‘notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India and commenced a separate investigation (‘AD proceeding’).
Komisija je istega dne z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3] („obvestilo o začetku“), objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Indije v Unijo in uvedla ločeno preiskavo („protidampinški postopek“).
The AS proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 31 March 2011 by the European Industrial Fasteners Institute (EIFI) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of total Union production of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof.
Protisubvencijski postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 31. marca 2011 vložil Evropski zavod za industrijske pritrdilne elemente – EIFI („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov v Uniji.
Prior to the initiation of the proceeding and in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the Government of India (the ‘GOI’) that it had received a properly documented complaint alleging that subsidised imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in India were causing material injury to the Union industry.
Komisija je pred začetkom postopka in v skladu s členom 10(7) osnovne uredbe obvestila indijsko vlado, da je prejela pravilno dokumentirano pritožbo o domnevnem subvencioniranem uvozu nekaterih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Indije, ki povzročajo materialno škodo industriji Unije.
No mutually agreed solution was found.
Dosežena ni bila nobena sporazumna rešitev.
In view of the large number of exporting producers in India, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation for the determination of subsidisation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Indiji je bilo v obvestilu o začetku za ugotavljanje subvencioniranja predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers in India were requested to make themselves known within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to provide basic information on their export and domestic sales, their precise activities with regard to the production of the product concerned and the names and activities of all their related companies involved in the production and/or selling of the product concerned during the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki v Indiji pozvani, da se javijo v roku 15 dni od datuma začetka preiskave in zagotovijo osnovne informacije o svojem izvozu in domači prodaji, o svojih natančno opredeljenih dejavnostih v zvezi s proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka ter imena in dejavnosti vseh povezanih družb, vključenih v proizvodnjo in/ali prodajo zadevnega izdelka med 1. aprilom 2010 in 31. marcem 2011.
In total, five exporting producers, including a group of related companies in India, provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample within the deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Skupaj je potrebne informacije predložilo in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec v navedenem roku iz obvestila o začetku pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključno s skupino povezanih družb iz Indije.
The comparison between Eurostat import data and the volume of exports to the Union of the product concerned reported for the investigation period by the five cooperating companies revealed that the cooperation of Indian exporting producers was close to 100 %.
Primerjava med podatki Eurostata o uvozu in obsegom izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, o katerem je v obdobju preiskave poročalo pet sodelujočih družb, je pokazala, da je bilo sodelovanje indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zelo visoko, namreč skoraj 100 %.
The sample selected consisted of three individual companies, together representing ca. 98 % of the total volume of exports from India to the Union of the product concerned.
Izbrani vzorec je bil sestavljen iz treh posameznih družb, ki skupaj predstavljajo približno 98 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Indije v Unijo.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, the parties concerned and the Indian authorities were consulted on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 27(2) osnovne uredbe se je Komisija o izbiri vzorca posvetovala z zadevnimi stranmi in indijskimi organi.
The two non-sampled exporting producers insisted to be also included in the sample.
Dva nevzorčena proizvajalca izvoznika sta vztrajala, da se tudi njiju vključi v vzorec.
However, in view of the representativity of the proposed sample, as mentioned in recital (11) above, it was concluded that it was not necessary to amend or enlarge the sample.
Ugotovljeno pa je bilo, da vzorca ni treba spremeniti ali povečati, ker je predlagani vzorec reprezentativen, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (11).
A claim for individual examination as per Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation was received from a non-sampled exporting producer.
Komisija je od nevzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika prejela zahtevek za individualno preiskavo v skladu s členom 27(3) osnovne uredbe.
The examination of this claim at the provisional stage would have been too burdensome to be carried out.
Izvedba te preiskave v začasni fazi bi bila preveč obremenjujoča.
Therefore, a decision whether individual examination will be granted to this company will be taken at a later stage.
Zato bo odločitev o odobritvi individualne preiskave tej družbi sprejeta pozneje.
In view of the apparent large number of Union producers, sampling was provided for in the notice of initiation for the determination of injury, in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku za ugotavljanje škode predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
In the notice of initiation the Commission announced that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku objavila, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.