natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such requirements could include, inter alia, the need to avert serious adverse consequences for the life, liberty or physical integrity of a person, the need to prevent prejudice to criminal proceedings, the need to prevent a criminal offence, the need to await a court hearing, and the need to protect victims of crime.
Takšne zahteve bi lahko med drugim vključevale potrebo po preprečitvi resnih škodljivih posledic za življenje, svobodo ali telesno nedotakljivost osebe, potrebo po preprečitvi posega v kazenski postopek, potrebo po preprečitvi kaznivega dejanja, potrebo po čakanju na sodno obravnavo in potrebo po zaščiti žrtev kaznivega dejanja.
When the competent authorities envisage limiting or deferring the exercise of the right to communicate in respect of a specific third person, they should first consider whether the suspects or accused persons could communicate with another third person nominated by them.
Če pristojni organi omejitev ali odlog uveljavljanja pravice do komunikacije predvidijo v zvezi z določeno tretjo osebo, bi morali najprej preučiti, ali bi lahko osumljene ali obdolžene osebe komunicirale z drugo tretjo osebo po svoji izbiri.
Member States may make practical arrangements concerning the timing, means, duration and frequency of communication with third persons, taking account of the need to maintain good order, safety and security in the place where the person is being deprived of liberty.
Države članice lahko določijo praktično ureditev časa, sredstev, trajanja in pogostosti komunikacije s tretjimi osebami, ob upoštevanju potrebe po vzdrževanju ustreznega reda, varnosti in zaščite na kraju, kjer se oseba, ki ji je odvzeta prostost, nahaja.
The right of suspects and accused persons who are deprived of liberty to consular assistance is enshrined in Article 36 of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations where it is a right conferred on States to have access to their nationals.
Pravica osumljenih in obdolženih oseb, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, do konzularne pomoči je določena v členu 36 Dunajske konvencije o konzularnih odnosih iz leta 1963, v katerem je to pravica držav do dostopa do svojih državljanov.
This Directive confers a corresponding right on suspects or accused persons who are deprived of liberty, subject to their wishes.
Ta direktiva tej pravici ustrezajočo pravico podeljuje osumljenim ali obdolženim osebam, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, ki jo lahko uveljavijo, če to želijo.
Consular protection may be exercised by diplomatic authorities where such authorities act as consular authorities.
Za konzularno varstvo lahko skrbijo diplomatski organi, kadar takšni organi delujejo kot konzularni organi.
Member States should clearly set out in their national law the grounds and criteria for any temporary derogations from the rights granted under this Directive, and they should make restricted use of those temporary derogations.
Države članice bi morale v svojem nacionalnem pravu jasno določiti razloge in merila za kakršno koli začasno odstopanje od pravic iz te direktive, takšna začasna odstopanja pa bi morale uporabljati le v izjemnih primerih.
Any such temporary derogations should be proportional, should be strictly limited in time, should not be based exclusively on the type or the seriousness of the alleged offence, and should not prejudice the overall fairness of the proceedings.
Vsakršna tovrstna začasna odstopanja bi morala biti sorazmerna, strogo časovno omejena, ne bi smela temeljiti izključno na vrsti ali teži domnevnega kaznivega dejanja in ne bi smela vplivati na splošno poštenost postopka.
Member States should ensure that where a temporary derogation has been authorised under this Directive by a judicial authority which is not a judge or a court, the decision on authorising the temporary derogation can be assessed by a court, at least during the trial stage.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da lahko v primeru, da je začasno odstopanje na podlagi te direktive odobril pravosodni organ, ki ni sodnik ali sodišče, to odločitev o odobritvi začasnega odstopanja oceni sodišče vsaj v fazi obravnave pred sodiščem.
Suspects or accused persons should be able to waive a right granted under this Directive provided that they have been given information about the content of the right concerned and the possible consequences of waiving that right.
Osumljene ali obdolžene osebe bi morale imeti možnost, da se odpovejo pravici, ki jo imajo v skladu s to direktivo, če so bile obveščene o vsebini zadevne pravice in morebitnih posledicah v primeru odpovedi navedeni pravici.
When providing such information, the specific conditions of the suspects or accused persons concerned should be taken into account, including their age and their mental and physical condition.
Pri takšnem obveščanju bi bilo treba upoštevati posebne okoliščine v zvezi z zadevnimi osumljenimi ali obdolženimi osebami, vključno z njihovo starostjo ter psihičnim in fizičnim stanjem.
A waiver and the circumstances in which it was given should be noted using the recording procedure in accordance with the law of the Member State concerned.
Odpoved pravici in okoliščine, v katerih je bila podana, bi bilo treba evidentirati po postopku za evidentiranje v skladu s pravom zadevne države članice.
This should not lead to any additional obligation for Member States to introduce new mechanisms or to any additional administrative burden.
Države članice zaradi tega ne bi smele imeti dodatnih obveznosti, da uvedejo nove mehanizme, ali kakršnih koli dodatnih upravnih obremenitev.
Where a suspect or accused person revokes a waiver in accordance with this Directive, it should not be necessary to proceed again with questioning or any procedural acts that have been carried out during the period when the right concerned was waived.
Kadar osumljena ali obdolžena oseba prekliče odpoved pravici v skladu s to direktivo, ne bi bilo treba znova opravljati zaslišanj ali morebitnih procesnih dejanj, ki so bila opravljena v obdobju, ko oseba zaradi odpovedi ni imela zadevne pravice.
Persons subject to a European arrest warrant (‘requested persons’) should have the right of access to a lawyer in the executing Member State in order to allow them to exercise their rights effectively under Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
Osebe, ki so v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zahtevane osebe), bi morale imeti pravico do dostopa do odvetnika v izvršitveni državi članici, da bi lahko učinkovito uveljavljale svoje pravice na podlagi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ.
Where a lawyer participates in a hearing of a requested person by an executing judicial authority, that lawyer may, inter alia, in accordance with procedures provided for under national law, ask questions, request clarification and make statements.
Kadar odvetnik sodeluje pri zaslišanju zahtevane osebe s strani izvršitvenega pravosodnega organa, lahko v skladu s postopki, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu, med drugim postavlja vprašanja, zahteva pojasnila in daje izjave.
The fact that the lawyer has participated in such a hearing should be noted using the recording procedure in accordance with the law of the Member State concerned.
Sodelovanje odvetnika v takšnem zaslišanju bi bilo treba evidentirati po postopku za evidentiranje v skladu s pravom zadevne države članice.
Requested persons should have the right to meet in private with the lawyer representing them in the executing Member State.
Zahtevane osebe bi morale imeti pravico do zasebnega srečanja z odvetnikom, ki jih zastopa v izvršitveni državi članici.
Member States may make practical arrangements concerning the duration and frequency of such meetings, taking into account the particular circumstances of the case.
Države članice lahko določijo praktično ureditev trajanja in pogostosti takšnih srečanj, pri čemer upoštevajo posebne okoliščine zadeve.
Member States may also make practical arrangements to ensure safety and security, in particular of the lawyer and of the requested person, in the place where the meeting between the lawyer and the requested person is conducted.
Države članice prav tako lahko določijo praktično ureditev, da zagotovijo varnost in zaščito, zlasti odvetnika in zahtevane osebe, na kraju srečanja med odvetnikom in zahtevano osebo.
Such practical arrangements should not prejudice the effective exercise and essence of the right of requested persons to meet with their lawyer.
Takšne praktične ureditve ne bi smele posegati v učinkovito uveljavljanje in v bistvo pravice zahtevanih oseb do srečanja z njihovim odvetnikom.
Requested persons should have the right to communicate with the lawyer representing them in the executing Member State.
Zahtevane osebe bi morale imeti pravico do komunikacije z odvetnikom, ki jih zastopa v izvršitveni državi članici.
It should be possible for such communication to take place at any stage, including before any exercise of the right to meet with the lawyer.
Takšna komunikacija bi morala biti omogočena v kateri koli fazi, tudi pred uveljavljanjem pravice do srečanja z odvetnikom.
Member States may make practical arrangements concerning the duration, frequency and means of communication between requested persons and their lawyer, including concerning the use of videoconferencing and other communication technology in order to allow such communications to take place.
Države članice lahko določijo praktično ureditev glede trajanja, pogostosti in sredstev komunikacije med zahtevanimi osebami in njihovim odvetnikom, tudi glede uporabe videokonferenc in drugih komunikacijskih tehnologij, da omogočijo takšno komunikacijo.
Such practical arrangements should not prejudice the effective exercise and essence of the right of requested persons to communicate with their lawyer.
Takšna praktična ureditev ne bi smela posegati v učinkovito uveljavljanje in v bistvo pravice zahtevanih oseb do komunikacije z njihovim odvetnikom.
Executing Member States should make the necessary arrangements to ensure that requested persons are in a position to exercise effectively their right of access to a lawyer in the executing Member State, including by arranging for the assistance of a lawyer when requested persons do not have one, unless they have waived that right.
Izvršitvene države članice bi morale poskrbeti, da lahko zahtevane osebe učinkovito uveljavljajo pravico do dostopa do odvetnika v izvršitveni državi članici, med drugim tako, da zahtevanim osebam uredijo pomoč odvetnika, če ga nimajo, razen če so se tej pravici odpovedale.
Such arrangements, including those on legal aid if applicable, should be governed by national law.
Takšna ureditev, vključno s pravno pomočjo, če je ta potrebna, bi morala biti določena v nacionalnem pravu.
They could imply, inter alia, that the competent authorities arrange for the assistance of a lawyer on the basis of a list of available lawyers from which requested persons could choose.
Med drugim bi lahko predvidevala, da pristojni organi zagotovijo pomoč odvetnika na podlagi seznama razpoložljivih odvetnikov, s katerega bi lahko zahtevane osebe izbirale.
Without undue delay after being informed that a requested person wishes to appoint a lawyer in the issuing Member State, the competent authority of that Member State should provide the requested person with information to facilitate the appointment of a lawyer in that Member State.
Ko je pristojni organ zadevne države članice obveščen, da želi zahtevana oseba izbrati odvetnika v odreditveni državi članici, bi moral zahtevanim osebam brez nepotrebnega odlašanja zagotoviti informacije, s katerimi jim olajša izbiro odvetnika v navedeni državi članici.
Such information could, for example, include a current list of lawyers, or the name of a lawyer on duty in the issuing State, who can provide information and advice in European arrest warrant cases.
Takšne informacije lahko na primer vključujejo aktualen seznam odvetnikov ali ime dežurnega odvetnika v odreditveni državi, ki lahko zagotovi informacije in nasvete v zadevah v zvezi z evropskim nalogom za prijetje.
Member States could request that the appropriate bar association draw up such a list.
Države članice bi lahko zahtevale, da takšen seznam pripravi ustrezno združenje odvetnikov.
The surrender procedure is crucial for cooperation in criminal matters between the Member States.
Postopek predaje je ključen pri sodelovanju držav članic v kazenskih zadevah.
Observance of the time-limits contained in Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA is essential for such cooperation.
Pri tem je izredno pomembno spoštovanje rokov iz Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ.
Therefore, while requested persons should be able to exercise fully their rights under this Directive in European arrest warrant proceedings, those time-limits should be respected.
Zato bi bilo treba navedene roke spoštovati, hkrati pa bi zahtevane osebe morale imeti možnost, da v postopkih na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice na podlagi te direktive.
Pending a legislative act of the Union on legal aid, Member States should apply their national law in relation to legal aid, which should be in line with the Charter, the ECHR and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
V času, ko še ni zakonodajnega akta Unije o pravni pomoči, bi morale države članice v zvezi s pravno pomočjo uporabljati nacionalno pravo, ki bi moralo biti v skladu z Listino, EKČP in sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
In accordance with the principle of effectiveness of Union law, Member States should put in place adequate and effective remedies to protect the rights that are conferred upon individuals by this Directive.
V skladu z načelom učinkovitosti prava Unije bi morale države članice uvesti ustrezna in učinkovita pravna sredstva za varstvo pravic, ki so posameznikom podeljene s to direktivo.
Member States should ensure that in the assessment of statements made by suspects or accused persons or of evidence obtained in breach of their right to a lawyer, or in cases where a derogation from that right was authorised in accordance with this Directive, the rights of the defence and the fairness of the proceedings are respected.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se pri vrednotenju izjav osumljenih ali obdolženih oseb ali dokazov, pridobljenih s kršitvijo njihove pravice do odvetnika, ali v zadevah, v katerih je bilo odobreno odstopanje od navedene pravice v skladu s to direktivo, spoštujeta pravica do obrambe in poštenost postopka.
In this context, regard should be had to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, which has established that the rights of the defence will, in principle, be irretrievably prejudiced when incriminating statements made during police interrogation without access to a lawyer are used for a conviction.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba upoštevati sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, v kateri se je uveljavilo, da gre načeloma za nepopravljiv poseg v pravico do obrambe, če so za obsodbo uporabljene obremenilne izjave, dane med policijskim zaslišanjem brez dostopa do odvetnika.
This should be without prejudice to the use of statements for other purposes permitted under national law, such as the need to execute urgent investigative acts to avoid the perpetration of other offences or serious adverse consequences for any person or related to an urgent need to prevent substantial jeopardy to criminal proceedings where access to a lawyer or delaying the investigation would irretrievably prejudice the ongoing investigations regarding a serious crime.
To ne bi smelo vplivati na uporabo izjav za druge namene, dovoljene na podlagi nacionalnega prava, če je na primer treba izvesti nujna preiskovalna dejanja, da se prepreči storitev drugih kršitev ali resne škodljive posledice za katero koli osebo, ali če je nujno preprečiti resno tveganje za kazenski postopek, kadar bi z zagotovitvijo dostopa do odvetnika ali zavlačevanjem preiskave nepopravljivo posegli v preiskavo hudega kaznivega dejanja.
Further, this should be without prejudice to national rules or systems regarding admissibility of evidence, and should not prevent Member States from maintaining a system whereby all existing evidence can be adduced before a court or a judge, without there being any separate or prior assessment as to admissibility of such evidence.
To prav tako ne bi smelo vplivati na nacionalne predpise ali sisteme glede dopustnosti dokazov, državam članicam pa ne bi smelo preprečevati uporabe sistema, v okviru katerega se lahko sodišču ali sodniku predložijo vsi obstoječi dokazi brez ločene ali predhodne ocene njihove dopustnosti.
The duty of care towards suspects or accused persons who are in a potentially weak position underpins a fair administration of justice.
Dolžnost skrbeti za osumljene ali obdolžene osebe, ki so v morebitno slabšem položaju, je podlaga za pošteno sojenje.
The prosecution, law enforcement and judicial authorities should therefore facilitate the effective exercise by such persons of the rights provided for in this Directive, for example by taking into account any potential vulnerability that affects their ability to exercise the right of access to a lawyer and to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty, and by taking appropriate steps to ensure those rights are guaranteed.
Zato bi morali tožilstvo, organi kazenskega pregona in pravosodni organi takšnim osebam omogočiti učinkovito uveljavljanje pravice iz te direktive, na primer z upoštevanjem morebitne ranljivosti, ki vpliva na njihovo zmožnost uveljavljanja pravice do dostopa do odvetnika in obvestitve tretje osebe ob odvzemu prostosti, ter sprejetjem ustreznih ukrepov za zagotovitev teh pravic.
This Directive upholds the fundamental rights and principles recognised by the Charter, including the prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment, the right to liberty and security, respect for private and family life, the right to the integrity of the person, the rights of the child, integration of persons with disabilities, the right to an effective remedy and the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence and the rights of the defence.
Ta direktiva podpira temeljne pravice in načela, priznane z Listino, vključno s prepovedjo mučenja ter nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja, pravico do svobode in varnosti, spoštovanjem zasebnega in družinskega življenja, pravico do osebne celovitosti, pravicami otroka, vključenostjo invalidov, pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in pravico do poštenega sojenja, domnevo nedolžnosti in pravico do obrambe.
This Directive should be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles.
To direktivo bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z navedenimi pravicami in načeli.
Member States should ensure that the provisions of this Directive, where they correspond to rights guaranteed by the ECHR, are implemented consistently with those of the ECHR and as developed by case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se določbe te direktive, kadar ustrezajo pravicam, zagotovljenim z EKČP, izvajajo skladno z določbami EKČP in sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
This Directive sets minimum rules.
Ta direktiva določa minimalna pravila.
Member States may extend the rights set out in this Directive in order to provide a higher level of protection.
Države članice lahko razširijo pravice iz te direktive, da zagotovijo višjo raven varstva.
Such higher level of protection should not constitute an obstacle to the mutual recognition of judicial decisions that those minimum rules are designed to facilitate.
Takšna višja raven varstva pa ne bi smela ovirati vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb, ki naj bi ga ta minimalna pravilna olajšala.
The level of protection should never fall below the standards provided by the Charter or by the ECHR, as interpreted by the case-law of the Court of Justice and of the European Court of Human Rights.
Raven varstva ne bi smela biti nikoli nižja od standardov, ki so določeni z Listino ali EKČP, kot se razlagajo v sodni praksi Sodišča in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
This Directive promotes the rights of children and takes into account the Guidelines of the Council of Europe on child friendly justice, in particular its provisions on information and advice to be given to children.
Ta direktiva spodbuja spoštovanje otrokovih pravic in upošteva smernice Sveta Evrope za otrokom prijazno pravosodje, zlasti njihove določbe o obveščenosti in svetovanju otrokom.
This Directive ensures that suspects and accused persons, including children, are provided with adequate information to understand the consequences of waiving a right under this Directive and that any such waiver is made voluntarily and unequivocally.
Ta direktiva zagotavlja, da so osumljene ali obdolžene osebe, tudi otroci, dovolj dobro obveščene, da bi razumele posledice odpovedi pravici, ki jim pripada na podlagi te direktive, vsaka takšna odpoved pravici pa bi morala biti dana prostovoljno in nedvoumno.
Where the suspect or accused person is a child, the holder of parental responsibility should be notified as soon as possible after the child’s deprivation of liberty and should be provided with the reasons therefor.
Kadar je osumljena ali obdolžena oseba otrok, bi moral biti nosilec starševske odgovornosti nemudoma obveščen o odvzemu prostosti otroka in o razlogih za to.
If providing such information to the holder of parental responsibility is contrary to the best interests of the child, another suitable adult such as a relative should be informed instead.
Če je takšna obvestitev nosilca starševske odgovornosti v nasprotju z otrokovimi koristmi, bi bilo treba namesto njega obvestiti drugo primerno odraslo osebo, na primer sorodnika.
This should be without prejudice to provisions of national law which require that any specified authorities, institutions or individuals, in particular those that are responsible for the protection or welfare of children, should be informed of the deprivation of liberty of a child.
To ne bi smelo posegati v določbe nacionalnega prava, v skladu s katerimi bi morali biti o odvzemu prostosti otroku obveščeni kateri koli določeni pristojni organi, institucije ali posamezniki, zlasti tisti, ki so pristojni za zaščito ali dobrobit otrok.
Member States should refrain from limiting or deferring the exercise of the right to communicate with a third party in respect of suspects or accused persons who are children and who are deprived of liberty, save in the most exceptional circumstances.
Države članice bi se morale vzdržati omejevanja ali odloga uveljavljanja pravice do komunikacije s tretjo osebo v zvezi z osumljenimi ali obdolženimi osebami, ki so otroci, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, razen v najbolj izjemnih okoliščinah.
Where a deferral is applied the child should, however, not be held incommunicado and should be permitted to communicate, for example with an institution or an individual responsible for the protection or welfare of children.
Če se uporabi odlog, pa otrok v nobenem primeru ne bi smel biti pridržan brez možnosti komunikacije, temveč bi mu morala biti dovoljena komunikacija, na primer z institucijo ali posameznikom, pristojnim za zaščito ali dobrobit otrok.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents [8], Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
Države članice so se v skladu s Skupno politično izjavo z dne 28. septembra 2011 držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih [8] zavezale, da bodo v upravičenih primerih uradnemu obvestilu o svojih ukrepih za prenos priložile enega ali več dokumentov, ki bodo pojasnjevali razmerje med sestavnimi deli direktive in ustrezajočimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
With regard to this Directive, the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified.
Zakonodajalec meni, da je posredovanje takšnih dokumentov v zvezi s to direktivo upravičeno.