natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This table is restated here for ease of reference, as the data and therefore the conclusions drawn from it have not changed.
Ta tabela se ponovno objavlja zaradi lažjega sklicevanja, čeprav se podatki in posledično ugotovitve niso spremenili.
Complaint and verified questionnaire replies of the sampled producers
Pritožba in preverjeni izpolnjeni vprašalniki vzorčenih proizvajalcev.
Despite the corrections made to the data published in the Provisional Regulation, the findings on captive use and sales remain unchanged.
Kljub popravkom podatkov, objavljenih v začasni uredbi, ostanejo ugotovitve o lastni porabi in prodaji nespremenjene.
The average value per tonne of captive sales remained stable during the period considered and was 3 % lower than the sales price to unrelated customers in the IP of the sampled Union producers.
Povprečna vrednost na tono lastne prodaje je v obravnavanem obdobju ostala stabilna in je bila 3 % nižja od prodajne cene za nepovezane stranke v OP vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
Based on the above, the provisional findings set out in recitals (110) to (113) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi tega se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (110) do (113) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
A comparison from 2009 to the end of the IP therefore shows a different trend to a comparison from the start of the period considered to the end of the IP.
Primerjava obdobja od leta 2009 do konca OP zato pokaže drugačno gibanje kot pa primerjava obdobja od začetka obravnavanega obdobja do konca OP.
This claim was not accepted.
Ta trditev ni bila sprejeta.
The period considered was defined in line with usual practice, and the recommendations of the WTO, as an objective period of three to four years ending at the end of the investigation period, which is itself a 12 month period ending as close as possible to the date of initiation.
Obravnavano obdobje je bilo določeno v skladu z običajno prakso in priporočili STO kot objektivno obdobje treh do štirih let, ki se konča ob koncu obdobja preiskave, ki je hkrati 12-mesečno obdobje, ki se konča čim bliže datumu začetka.
Even if the period considered had started in 2009, the finding of material injury would remain valid.
Tudi če bi se obravnavano obdobje začelo leta 2009, bi ugotovitve znatne škode ostale veljavne.
The Union industry had not reached its target profit with increasing imports during the period despite increasing production volumes, and sales volumes, and increasing productivity.
Industrija Unije z vedno večjim uvozom v tem obdobju ni dosegla ciljnega dobička kljub povečanju obsega proizvodnje, obsega prodaje in večje produktivnosti.
As consumption rises after 2009 this increase was supplied by imports from China, and not by the Union industry, who lost market share from 2009 to the end of the IP.
Povečani potrošnji po letu 2009 je bilo zadoščeno z uvozom iz Kitajske in ne z industrijo Unije, ki je od leta 2009 do konca OP izgubila na tržnem deležu.
In the absence of comments, the provisional findings set out in recitals (115) to (119) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (115) do (119) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Given the small changes made to the data from the Union industry, this has also slightly affected the data concerning market shares of imports from third countries.
Majhne spremembe podatkov industrije Unije so prav tako nekoliko vplivale na podatke o tržnih deležih uvoza iz tretjih držav.
Some interested parties challenged the Commission's decision to open an investigation only against China, and not against India and South Korea, although the import volumes and price trends matched those of the PRC.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so izpodbijale sklep Komisije, da začne preiskavo samo proti Kitajski in ne proti Indiji ter Južni Koreji, čeprav sta obseg uvoza in gibanje cen enaka tistim v LRK.
As set out in recitals (120) to (122) of the provisional Regulation, import volumes from India fell during the period considered, and imports from South Korea increased by only 4 %.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (120) do (122) začasne uredbe, se je obseg uvoza iz Indije v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal, uvoz iz Južne Koreje pa se je povečal samo za 4 %.
Indian prices dropped by 12 % and South Korean prices remained stable, but at all times higher than those from China.
Indijske cene so se znižale za 12 %, južnokorejske pa so ostale stabilne, vendar so bile ves čas višje od kitajskih.
The argument is therefore rejected as the Commission received no evidence or allegation of dumping and resulting injury from those countries.
Argument se zato zavrne, saj Komisija ni prejela nobenega dokaza ali trditve o obstoju dampinga in posledično škode iz navedenih držav.
The findings as set out in recitals (120) to (122) of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Zato se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (120) do (122) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Eurostat and verified questionnaire replies
Eurostat in preverjeni izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
In the absence of comments on the export performance of the Union industry, the findings of recitals (123) to (124) are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede izvoza industrije Unije, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (123) do (124) potrdijo.
Imports from the PRC by the Union industry
Uvoz industrije Unije iz LRK
Some parties continued making allegations that contrary to that stated in recital (125) of the provisional Regulation, the import volumes of the Union industry from the PRC constituted up to 40 % of total imports from the PRC.
Nekatere strani so še naprej trdile, da je v nasprotju z navedbami iz uvodne izjave (125) začasne uredbe obseg uvoza industrije Unije iz LRK predstavljal do 40 % celotnega uvoza iz LRK.
No evidence was provided for this allegation and it could not be confirmed.
Za to trditev ni bil zagotovljen noben dokaz in je zato ni bilo mogoče potrditi.
The allegation is therefore rejected.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
Following final disclosure one importer claimed that the Union industry was importing large quantities of the product concerned from the PRC and used its re-sales data to demonstrate this.
Po končnem razkritju je en uvoznik trdil, da je industrija Unije uvažala velike količine zadevnega izdelka iz LRK, kar je prikazal z njenimi podatki o nadaljnji prodaji.
The fact that the Union industry has imported quantities of the product concerned from the PRC is not in dispute.
Dejstvo, da je industrija Unije uvozila velike količine zadevnega izdelka iz LRK, ni sporno.
However, even using the importer's own data, the volume claimed is less than 1 % of total imports from the PRC and therefore negligible.
Vendar znaša navedeni obseg tudi po podatkih uvoznika manj kot 1 % celotnega uvoza iz LRK in je zato zanemarljiv.
As stated in recital (125) of the provisional Regulation, imports from the PRC by the Union industry were 2-3 % of total imports during the investigation period.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (125) začasne uredbe, je uvoz industrije Unije iz LRK v obdobju preiskave znašal 2–3 % celotnega uvoza.
The findings of recital (125) of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (125) začasne uredbe se zato potrdijo.
Following final disclosure CISA again claimed that the Union industry was making OCS available to its related downstream businesses at a "subsidised" price, thereby undercutting their competitors in the downstream segment.
Po končnem razkritju je Kitajsko združenje za železo in jeklo ponovno trdilo, da je dala industrija Unije jeklene izdelke, prevlečene z organskimi premazi, na voljo svojim povezanim družbam v nadaljnji proizvodnji po „subvencioniranih“ cenah, s čimer je nelojalno nižala cene svojih konkurentov v segmentu nadaljnje proizvodnje.
However, no evidence was provided to change the Commission's conclusion in recital (127) of the provisional Regulation, i.e. that the price difference between related and unrelated sales was small (2 %) and that this was not a case of self-inflicted injury.
Vendar pa niso bili predloženi nobeni dokazi, ki bi spremenili ugotovitev Komisije iz uvodne izjave (127) začasne uredbe, tj. da so bile razlike v cenah med prodajo povezanim in nepovezanim družbam majhne (2 %) in da to ni bila samopovzročena škoda.
CISA also challenged the data on the cost of production of OCS and, in extension, the price of OCS to related parties.
Kitajsko združenje za železo in jeklo je tudi spodbijalo podatke o stroških proizvodnje jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, in, posledično, ceno jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, za povezane strani.
Given the sales price of hot-dipped galvanised coils, a raw material in the manufacture of OCS, they allege that the cost of production of OCS in the investigation period could not exceed 900 EUR/tonne.
Glede na prodajno ceno vroče galvaniziranih kolobarjev, ki je surovina pri proizvodnji jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, trdijo, da stroški proizvodnje jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, v obdobju preiskave niso mogli presegati 900 EUR/tono.
Whereas the Commission does not dispute the data provided by CISA regarding the production cost of hot-dipped galvanised coils, the cost of production of OCS was verified in all of the sampled Union producers.
Medtem ko Komisija ne oporeka podatkom, ki jih je predložilo Kitajsko združenje za železo in jeklo v zvezi s stroški proizvodnje vroče galvaniziranih kolobarjev, pa so bili stroški proizvodnje jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, preverjeni pri vseh vzorčenih proizvajalcih Unije.
The Commission is satisfied that the full cost of production (raw materials, processing, coating, SG&A, finance costs etc.) is as set out in recital (74) above.
Komisija je preverila da je celoten strošek proizvodnje (surovine, obdelava, prevleka, PSA-stroški, stroški financiranja itd.) tak, kot je opredeljen v uvodni izjavi (74).
CISA then claimed that the sale of OCS to related parties is made at a loss and is therefore a cause of injury to the Union industry.
Kitajsko združenje za železo in jeklo je nato trdilo, da se jeklene izdelke, prevlečene z organskimi premazi, povezanim stranem prodaja z izgubo, kar je vzrok škode za industrijo Unije.
This is based on a comparison of the total cost of production (978 EUR/tonne) versus the average price of related sale (965 EUR/tonne).
To temelji na primerjavi celotnih stroškov proizvodnje (978 EUR/tono) s povprečno ceno prodaje povezanim stranem (965 EUR/tono).
Whereas it is correct that a simple mathematical comparison would suggest that related sales were made at a loss, this would assume that the Union industry would incur the same level of SG&A and other sales overheads on their captive sales as on their unrelated ones.
Res je, da bi preprosta matematična primerjava kazala na to, da prodaja povezanim stranem ustvarja izgubo, vendar pa bi to pomenilo, da bi industrija Unije imela enake PSA-stroške in druge režijske stroške pri lastni prodaji kot pri prodaji nepovezanim stranem.
As stated in recital (105) of the provisional Regulation, sales to related parties were made on a 'cost plus' basis and therefore the Union Industry was recovering their costs on these sales.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (105) začasne uredbe, je bila prodaja povezanim stranem izvedena s stroškovnim pribitkom („cost plus“), s čimer je industrija Unije nadoknadila stroške te prodaje.
In the absence of other comments on this point the findings of recitals (126) to (127) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (126) in (127) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
After the deadline for comments to the final disclosure an interested party noted the announced closure of a plant in Belgium, and that force majeure was causing difficulties to normal production and shipment from other facilities in Belgium.
Po izteku roka za pripombe na končno razkritje je zainteresirana stran opozorila na napovedano zaprtje obrata v Belgiji in da zaradi višje sile nastajajo težave pri normalni proizvodnji ter dobavi iz drugih obratov v Belgiji.
The interested party alleged that this shows the lack of security of supply of OCS in the EU and was a reason to allow importers and users to freely source their OCS from the EU and from China.
Zainteresirana stran je trdila, da to kaže na pomanjkanje zanesljivosti pri dobavi jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, v EU in je razlog, da se uvoznikom in uporabnikom dovoli, da svoje jeklene izdelke, prvlečene z organskimi premazi, prosto pridobivajo iz EU in Kitajske.
These arguments are rejected.
Te trditve se zavrnejo.
Given that capacity utilisation in the EU is low, the issue is not one of a problem of supply as the Union industry has adequate available capacity.
Glede na to, da je izkoriščenost zmogljivosti v Uniji majhna, pri tem ne gre za problem dobave, saj ima industrija Unije ustrezne razpoložljive zmogljivosti.
In any case the facilities being closed in Belgium did not manufacture OCS.
Tako ali tako pa obrat, ki se v Belgiji zapira, ni proizvajal jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi.
Security of supply is of course important, but the proposed duties in this case are not designed to stop supply of OCS from China, merely to prevent that supply being dumped onto the Union market.
Zanesljivost dobave je seveda pomembna, vendar predlagane dajatve v tem primeru niso zasnovane za ustavitev dobave jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, iz Kitajske, temveč je njihov namen preprečiti dampinški uvoz navedenega dobavljenega blaga na trg Unije.
In the absence of other comments on this point the findings of recitals (128) to (129) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (128) in (129) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Some parties made further allegations that the Union producers had a structural overcapacity, exceeding the total Union consumption.
Nekatere strani so nadalje trdile, da so imeli proizvajalci Unije strukturne presežne zmogljivosti, kar je presegalo celotno potrošnjo Unije.
The allegation had been made at an earlier stage and was dealt with in recitals (130) to (132) of the provisional Regulation.
Trditev je bila izražena v zgodnejši fazi in je bila obravnavana v uvodnih izjavah od (130) do (132) začasne uredbe.
In the absence of further evidence on this point, the conclusion of these recitals is therefore confirmed.
Ob odsotnosti nadaljnjih dokazov v zvezi s tem vprašanjem se sklepi teh uvodnih izjav zato potrdijo.
Increase in cost of production
Povišanje proizvodnih stroškov
Some parties made further allegations that a source of injury to the Union producers was an increase in their cost of production during the period considered.
Nekatere strani so nadalje trdile, da je škodo proizvajalcem Unije povzročilo povišanje njihovih proizvodnih stroškov v obravnavanem obdobju.
Data above shows that cost of production on average increased by only 6 %.
Zgoraj navedeni podatki kažejo, da so se stroški proizvodnje povprečno zvišali le za 6 %.
In the absence of dumped imports from the PRC the Union industry should have been able to pass this increase on to its customers, yet prices fell by 3 %.
V odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza iz LRK bi industrija Unije morala biti sposobna prenesti to povečanje na svoje stranke, vendar pa so se cene znižale za 3 %.
The claim that cost of production was a cause of injury is therefore rejected.
Trditev, da so stroški proizvodnje povzročili škodo, se zato zavrne.
Based on the above, the provisional findings as set out in recitals (133) to (136) of the provisional Regulation that the dumped imports from the PRC caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation are maintained.
Na podlagi navedenega se ohranijo začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (133) do (136) začasne uredbe, da je dampinški uvoz iz LRK povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
The provisional findings about the effect of the other known factors which could have caused injury to the Union industry were also confirmed:
Prav tako so se potrdile začasne ugotovitve o učinkih drugih znanih dejavnikov, ki bi lahko povzročili škodo industriji Unije:
these factors are not such as to break the causal link established between the dumped imports from the PRC and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
ti dejavniki niso taki, da bi pretrgali ugotovljeno vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz LRK in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
No new comments or information were received regarding the interest of the Union producers after disclosure of the provisional findings.
Po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev niso bile prejete nobene nove pripombe ali informacije v zvezi z interesom proizvajalcev Unije.
Therefore recitals (138) to (143) of the provisional Regulation on the interest of these interested parties are hereby confirmed.
Zato se uvodne izjave od (138) do (143) začasne uredbe o interesu teh zainteresiranih strani potrdijo.
Importers, traders and users
Uvozniki, trgovci in uporabniki
Comments were received from importers and other interested parties following final disclosure, however no new comments or information were received regarding the interest of importers, traders or users.
Po končnem razkritju so bile prejete pripombe uvoznikov in drugih zainteresiranih strani, niso pa bile prejete nobene nove pripombe ali informacije v zvezi z interesom uvoznikov, trgovcev ali uporabnikov.
Therefore the provisional findings in recitals (144) to (152) of the provisional Regulation on the interest of these parties are hereby confirmed.
Zato se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (144) do (152) začasne uredbe o interesu teh strani potrdijo.
Conclusion on Union interest
Ugotovitev o interesu Unije
In view of the above, the provisional findings concerning Union interest are confirmed, i.e. there are no compelling reasons against the imposition of definitive measures on imports of OCS originating in the PRC.
Glede na navedeno se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z interesom Unije, in sicer da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov za uvoz jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, s poreklom iz LRK.
Following provisional disclosure, two interested parties claimed that the data provided did not give sufficient information and explanation on the calculation of the undercutting and underselling margins.
Po začasnem razkritju sta dve zainteresirani strani trdili, da podatki niso zagotavljali zadostnih informacij in pojasnil glede izračuna nelojalnega nižanja cen in prodaje pod ceno.
As explained in the provisional disclosure, some values were not disclosed due to confidentiality as the model concerned was only manufactured by one or two Union producers.
Kot je razloženo v začasnem razkritju, nekatere vrednosti niso bile razkrite zaradi zaupnosti podatkov, saj zadevni model proizvajata le eden ali dva proizvajalca Unije.
At the stage of final disclosure ranges for these models were disclosed.
V fazi končnega razkritja so bili razkriti razponi za te modele.
Interested parties also challenged the use of 6,7 % as the target profit of the Union industry to calculate the injury margin.
Zainteresirane strani so izpodbijale tudi uporabo 6,7-odstotnega ciljnega dobička industrije Unije za izračun stopnje dampinga.
They claimed that such a profit is overstated and unrealistic given the current economic environment and that 2008 was not a representative year for profitability, as it was an exceptional year for the steel industry.
Trdile so, da je tak dobiček pretiran in nerealen glede na sedanje gospodarsko okolje ter da leto 2008 v smislu dobičkonosnosti ni bilo reprezentativno, saj je bilo to leto za jeklarsko industrijo izjemno.
Firstly, profitability for OCS was in fact higher before 2008 than in 2008, which contradicts the claim that 2008 is an exceptional year.
Prvič, dobičkonosnost jeklenih izdelkov, prevlečenih z organskimi premazi, je bila pred letom 2008 dejansko višja kot v letu 2008, kar je v nasprotju s trditvijo, da je bilo leto 2008 izjemno.
Secondly, the target profit is the profit that can be obtained in the absence of dumped imports.
Drugič, ciljni dobiček je enak dobičku, ki se ga lahko doseže v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza.
2008 was the last year where the full effects of the dumped imports had not yet been felt by the Union industry and therefore is a suitable basis for establishing the target profit.
Leto 2008 je bilo zadnje leto, ko industrija Unije še ni čutila celotnega učinka dampinškega uvoza, zato je navedeno leto ustrezna osnova za določitev ciljnega dobička.
Following final disclosure interested parties again challenged the use of 6,7 % as the target profit of the Union industry and the description of 2008 as a representative year for profitability.
Po končnem razkritju so zainteresirane strani ponovno izpodbijale določitev ciljnega dobička industrije Unije na 6,7 % in opis leta 2008 kot reprezentativnega za dobičkonosnost.
This argument is rejected as no evidence as to what the profit of the Union industry would have been in 2008 in the absence of the financial crisis was provided.
Ta trditev se zavrne, saj ni bil zagotovljen noben dokaz o tem, kakšen bi bil dobiček industrije Unije v letu 2008 v odsotnosti finančne krize.
In addition, their argument that the profit made by the Union industry in 2008 was affected by the financial crisis, making 2008 an exceptional year, would seem to point to an argument that the profit generated in 2008 is lower than the industry would expect in a normal year.
Poleg tega njihova trditev, da je na dobiček, ki ga je industrija Unije ustvarila leta 2008, vplivala finančna kriza in je bilo zato leto 2008 izjemno, kaže na argument, da je dobiček, ustvarjen v letu 2008, nižji od dobička, ki bi ga industrija Unije lahko pričakovala v običajnem letu.
CISA have further alleged that the profit to unrelated customers in 2008 cannot be used as the target profit because that year shows the largest price difference between related and unrelated sales.
Kitajsko združenje za železo in jeklo je tudi trdilo, da dobička, ustvarjenega s prodajo nepovezanim stranem leta 2008, ni mogoče uporabiti kot ciljni dobiček, saj navedeno leto kaže največje razlike v cenah med prodajo povezanim in nepovezanim stranem.
This argument was rejected, as this price difference is not relevant to the calculation of the profit of sales to unrelated customers.
Ta argument je bil zavrnjen, ker ta razlika v ceni ni pomembna za izračun dobička prodaje nepovezanim kupcem.
Interested parties also challenged the post-importation costs used to calculate the provisional duties as they were based on the data from only one importer.
Zainteresirane strani so spodbijale tudi stroške, nastale po uvozu, ki se uporabljajo za izračun začasnih dajatev, ker so temeljili na podatkih enega samega uvoznika.
The Commission verified a second importer at a later stage and their data has been now used to calculate post-importation costs.
Komisija je pozneje preverila drugega uvoznika, katerega podatki so bili sedaj uporabljeni za izračun stroškov, nastalih po uvozu.
By using an average of the two companies these costs have now dropped slightly, thereby increasing the injury margins accordingly.
Z uporabo povprečja obeh družb so se sedaj ti stroški rahlo znižali, s čimer se je povečala stopnja škode.
One interested party challenged the Commission's methodology for the calculation of the underselling margin.
Ena zainteresirana stran je izpodbijala metodologijo Komisije za izračun stopnje nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen.