natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, the undercutting margin of the CeDo group was reduced by the revision of the unrelated importers’ profit margin (see recital 23).
Poleg tega je bila stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen v skupini CeDo znižana s popravkom stopnje dobička nepovezanih uvoznikov (glej uvodno izjavo 23).
However, the weighted average undercutting margin of the sampled exporting producers remains above 7 %.
Vendar pa je tehtana povprečna stopnja nelojalno znižanih prodajnih cen vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov še vedno nad 7 %.
With the exception of the above changes and in the absence of any other comment concerning prices of dumped imports and price undercutting, the methodology described in recital 90 to 94 of the provisional Regulation to establish price undercutting is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s cenami dampinškega uvoza in nelojalnim nižanjem prodajnih cen ni bilo drugih pripomb, se metodologija iz uvodnih izjav 90 do 94 začasne uredbe za ugotovitev nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen potrdi, razen navedenih sprememb.
Preliminary remarks and data relating to the Union industry
Uvodne opombe in podatki v zvezi z industrijo Unije
In the absence of any comments in this regard, the provisional findings set out in recitals 95 to 107 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 95 do 107 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of comments in this regard, recital 108 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo pripomb, se uvodna izjava 108 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Based on the above, the provisional findings set out in recitals 109 to 112 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 109 do 112 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
CAUSALITY
VZROČNA ZVEZA
The Commission received no comments on the provisional findings concerning the causal link between dumping and injury.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb k začasnim ugotovitvam v zvezi z vzročno zvezo med dampingom in škodo.
It is consequently confirmed that the dumped imports from the PRC caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation and that there are no other known factors which are as such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports from the PRC and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Zato se potrdi, da je dampinški uvoz iz LRK industriji Unije povzročil znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe in da ni drugih znanih dejavnikov, ki bi lahko prekinili vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz LRK in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Therefore, the conclusions as set out in recitals 113 to 136 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 113 do 136 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the interest of the Union industry, recitals 138 to 142 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z interesom industrije Unije ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 138 do 142 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Importers/wholesalers
Uvozniki/prodajalci na debelo
Cooperation from the importing sector was very low and, as already mentioned in recital 146 of the provisional Regulation, only two importers had submitted a questionnaire reply.
Sodelovanje uvoznega sektorja je bilo zelo skromno in, kakor je bilo omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 146 začasne uredbe, sta na vprašalnik odgovorila samo dva uvoznika.
As mentioned in recital 23, after the imposition of provisional measures, the largest importer (Robinson Young, UK) was visited to verify its questionnaire response.
Kakor je zapisano v uvodni izjavi 23, je bil po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov obiskan največji uvoznik (Robinson Young, Združeno kraljestvo), da bi se preverili njegovi odgovori na vprašalnik.
The verification resulted in a correction of the reported profitability of this company on its relevant activities.
Na podlagi tega preveritvenega obiska je bil izveden popravek sporočene dobičkonosnosti te družbe iz naslova njenih zadevnih dejavnosti.
As a consequence, the weighted average profit margin of the two cooperating sampled importers went down.
Zato se je tehtana povprečna stopnja dobička dveh sodelujočih vzorčenih uvoznikov zmanjšala.
However, the reduction in profit of the cooperating importers was not considered to be significant in terms of the Union interest analysis because both profit rates (before and after the correction) were moderate.
Vendar pa se dobiček zadevnih sodelujočih uvoznikov z vidika analize interesov Unije ni znatno zmanjšal, ker sta bili obe stopnji dobička (pred in po popravku) zmerni.
One of the sampled importers contested the preliminary conclusion summarized in recital 148 of the provisional Regulation that the impact of the measures on the importing sector as a whole would not be disproportionate as it could be forced to exit the market if the measures would be confirmed.
Eden od vzorčenih uvoznikov je izpodbijal prvotno ugotovitev, povzeto v uvodni izjavi 148 začasne uredbe, in sicer da naj bi učinek ukrepov na uvozni sektor na splošno ne bil nesorazmeren, ker bi bil zadevni uvoznik ob potrditvi ukrepov lahko prisiljen zapustiti trg.
However, in the provisional Regulation it was indeed concluded that the Union industry might win back some contracts to the detriment of the importing sector.
Vendar pa je bilo v začasni uredbi dejansko ugotovljeno, da bi industrija Unije verjetno lahko znova pridobila nekatere pogodbe na škodo uvoznega sektorja.
However, there is no doubt that imports of the product concerned will continue to serve the Union market, albeit now on the basis of fair competition and, therefore, possibly on a smaller scale.
Nobenega dvoma ni, da bo uvoz zadevnega izdelka še naprej služil trgu Unije, vendar od zdaj naprej pod poštenimi konkurenčnimi pogoji in zato morda v manjšem obsegu.
In view of that, it is confirmed that the overall impact on the importing sector is not disproportionate.
Glede na navedeno se potrdi, da učinek na uvozni sektor na splošno ni nesorazmeren.
No further comments or information were received regarding the interests of importers or wholesalers.
V zvezi z interesi uvoznikov in prodajalcev na debelo niso bile predložene dodatne pripombe ali informacije.
Therefore the provisional findings in recitals 143 to 149 of the provisional Regulation on the interest of those groups are hereby confirmed.
Zato se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 143 do 149 začasne uredbe o interesu teh skupin potrdijo.
Retailers and consumers
Prodajalci na drobno in potrošniki
In the absence of comments concerning the interest of retailers and consumers, recitals 150 to 153 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z interesi prodajalcev na drobno in potrošnikov ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 150 do 153 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In view of the above, the provisional findings concerning Union interest are confirmed, i.e. there are no compelling reasons against the imposition of definitive measures on imports of certain aluminium foils in rolls originating in the PRC.
Glede na navedeno se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z interesom Unije, in sicer da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov za uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij v zvitkih s poreklom iz LRK.
After disclosure of the provisional findings, Ningbo Favored made a submission concerning the methodology employed to calculate the injury margins.
Družba Ningbo Favored je po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev predložila stališče v zvezi z metodologijo, ki je bila uporabljena za izračun stopenj škode.
The company claimed that the adjustments made to the PCN structure had created an imbalance.
Družba je trdila, da so prilagoditve strukture PCN povzročile neravnovesje.
In particular, it claimed that packaging costs were probably responsible for distorting the data.
Menila je zlasti, da so stroški pakiranja verjetno povzročili izkrivljanje podatkov.
A second issue concerned the method employed to ensure fair comparison in terms of level of trade.
Drugi argument se je navezoval na metodo, ki je bila uporabljena za zagotovitev poštene primerjave z vidika trgovinske ravni.
At the provisional stage the Union data was split between retail and wholesale sales channels, however, Ningbo Favored argued that this created two target prices per product type which it said would be unlawful.
V začasni fazi so bili podatki za Unijo razdeljeni glede na prodajne poti za prodajo na drobno in tiste za prodajo na debelo; družba Ningbo Favored je trdila, da sta bili s tem ustvarjeni dve ciljni ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka, kar je bilo po njenem mnenju nezakonito.
With reference to the claim on the adjustment made to the PCN structure, simulations have shown that there would be distortions if no adjustment was made.
Kar zadeva trditev v zvezi s prilagoditvijo strukture PCN, so simulacije pokazale, da bi prišlo do izkrivljanja, če struktura PCN ne bi bila prilagojena.
Those changes to the PCN structure (which were in effect a consolidation of data to improve matching rates and representativity) had removed distortions and improved the reliability of the calculations.
Navedene prilagoditve strukture PCN (s katerimi so bili podatki dejansko konsolidirani, da bi se izboljšala stopnja ujemanj in reprezentativnost) so odpravile izkrivljanje in prispevale k večji zanesljivosti izračunov.
The second issue raised by the Ningbo Favored, regarding the method provisionally employed to ensure fair comparison in terms of level of trade, was also duly analysed.
Ustrezno je bil proučen tudi drugi argument družbe Ningbo Favored v zvezi z metodo, ki je bila uporabljena v začasni fazi za zagotovitev poštene primerjave z vidika trgovinske ravni.
In this respect it was found that although prices usually differed between the two sales channels, no identifiable or consistent pattern was present in the current case.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so se cene pri navedenih dveh prodajnih poteh običajno razlikovale, vendar v obravnavani zadevi ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti prepoznavnega ali doslednega vzorca.
Indeed, in certain instances, the producer sale prices to retailers would be lower than those to wholesalers, whereas in other cases the opposite would be the case.
V nekaterih primerih so bile namreč proizvajalčeve prodajne cene za prodajalce na drobno nižje od tistih za prodajalce na debelo, v spet drugih primerih pa je veljalo nasprotno.
It was therefore decided to accept this claim that no level of trade adjustment should be made because the conditions for such adjustment were not met.
Zato je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se ta argument družbe sprejme, torej da se prilagoditev trgovinske ravni ne izvede, ker pogoji za to niso izpolnjeni.
Consequently, the definitive calculations of the injury elimination levels have been done on the basis of consolidated prices of both the exporting producers and the Union industry, making no adjustment for level of trade.
Dokončni izračuni stopenj odprave škode so zato temeljili na konsolidiranih cenah proizvajalcev izvoznikov in tudi industrije Unije, pri čemer trgovinska raven ni bila prilagojena.
This change in methodology slightly affected the injury margins.
Ta sprememba metodologije je rahlo vplivala na stopnje škode.
In response to the definitive disclosure, Ningbo Favored argued that the method used to calculate underselling was flawed and unreliable because, on the Union industry side, its starting point was the Union sales price per PCN rather than the cost of production per PCN.
Po razkritju dokončnih ugotovitev je družba Ningbo Favored trdila, da je bila metoda, uporabljena za izračun nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen, pomanjkljiva in nezanesljiva, saj je bila izhodiščna točka za industrijo Unije prodajna cena v Uniji na PCN in ne proizvodni stroški na PCN.
Ningbo Favored concluded that the COP per PCN was not used because the Commission officials ‘did not urge’ the company to provide the relevant data and the proceeding should therefore be terminated because of a ‘lack of evidence’.
Družba Ningbo Favored je sklenila, da proizvodni stroški na PCN niso bili uporabljeni, ker uslužbenci Komisije družbe „niso pozvali k nujni predložitvi“ zadevnih podatkov in bi bilo treba postopek zato ustaviti zaradi „pomanjkanja dokazov“.
However, the basic Regulation does not prescribe how Union industry’s target price should be established.
Osnovna uredba dejansko ne predpisuje načina za določanje ciljne cene industrije Unije.
It is common practice to do this either on the basis of cost of production per PCN plus target profit, or by using the ex-works sales prices per PCN to unrelated customers on the Union market and adjusting those by the actual profit/loss made during the IP and by adding the established target profit.
V skladu z uveljavljeno prakso se to stori bodisi na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov na PCN, ki se povečajo za ciljni dobiček, bodisi na podlagi prodajnih cen franko tovarna na PCN, zaračunanih nepovezanim strankam na trgu Unije, ki se prilagodijo glede na dejanski dobiček ali izgubo v OP in povečajo za določeni ciljni dobiček.
Both methods are reliable and they may be used interchangeably (depending on the circumstances).
Obe metodologiji sta zanesljivi in se lahko (odvisno od okoliščin) izmenično uporabljata.
In the investigation, the second method (i.e. on the basis of actual Union sales prices to unrelated customers) was employed because not all the sampled Union producers were able to calculate a reliable COP per PCN.
V okviru preiskave je bila uporabljena drugonavedena metoda (tj. na podlagi dejanskih prodajnih cen v Uniji, zaračunanih nepovezanim strankam), ker nekateri vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije niso mogli na zanesljiv način izračunati proizvodnih stroškov na PCN.
In view of the above, the allegation that the method adopted is unreliable and the claim that the proceeding should therefore be terminated are rejected.
Glede na navedeno se trditev, da uporabljena metodologija ni zanesljiva, in argument, da bi bilo treba postopek zato končati, zavrneta.
The CeDo Group claimed that the methodology used for calculating its provisional injury margins was not correct because it did not fully take into account the structure of the CeDo Group.
Skupina CeDo je trdila, da metodologija, ki je bila uporabljena za izračun njenih začasnih stopenj škode, ni bila pravilna, ker ni v celoti upoštevala strukture skupine.
Indeed the importer CeDo UK, related to a sampled cooperating exporting producer (‘CeDo (Shanghai)’), supplies the Union market with foil produced in both the PRC and the Union, all channelled via a related importer/trader.
Dejansko uvoznik CeDo UK, ki je povezan z vzorčenim sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom („CeDo (Shanghai)“), na trgu Unije dobavlja aluminijaste folije, ki so proizvedene v LRK, in tudi tiste, ki so proizvedene v Uniji, in sicer v obeh primerih prek povezanega uvoznika/trgovca.
The company claimed that SGA of this related importer and a profit margin should not have been deducted from CeDo resales price as competition takes place at the level of customers in the Union.
Skupina je trdila, da se prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški povezanega uvoznika in stopnja dobička ne bi smeli odbiti od cene skupine CeDo pri nadaljnji prodaji, ker konkurenca poteka na ravni strank v Uniji.
CeDo sales prices at customers’ level, it claimed, would not be injurious to the Union industry.
Trdila je, da njene prodajne cene na ravni strank ne bi povzročile škode industriji Unije.
CeDo’s assertion regarding its sales prices vis-à-vis those of the Union industry was challenged by several submissions from complaining Union producers.
Trditev skupine CeDo glede njenih prodajnih cen v primerjavi s prodajnimi cenami industrije Unije so v več predložitvah stališč izpodbijali proizvajalci Unije, ki so se pritožili.
However, this issue could not be further investigated because the information submitted by the parties could not be verified at such a late stage in the investigation.
Vendar pa tega vprašanja ni bilo mogoče nadalje proučiti, ker informacij, ki so jih predložile strani, ni bilo več mogoče preveriti v tako napredni fazi preiskave.
On substance, it should be noted that the purpose of calculating an injury margin is to determine whether applying to the CIF price of the dumped imports a lower duty rate than the one based on the dumping margin would be sufficient to remove the injury caused by the dumped imports.
Treba je opomniti, da je namen izračuna stopnje škode ugotoviti, ali bi uporaba stopnje dajatve za ceno CIF dampinškega uvoza, ki bi bila nižja od tiste, določene na podlagi stopnje dampinga, zadostovala za odpravo škode, ki jo povzroči dampinški uvoz.
This assessment should be based on the CIF price of the imports in question, which is considered to be a level comparable to the Union industry ex-works price.
Ta ocena bi morala temeljiti na ceni CIF zadevnega uvoza, ki velja za primerljivo s ceno franko tovarna industrije Unije.
In the case of imports made via related importers, by analogy with the approach followed for the dumping margin calculations, which the injury margin calculations could substitute for the determination of the duty rate in application of the lesser-duty rule, the CIF price is constructed on the basis of the resales price to the first independent customer duly adjusted pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Po analogiji s pristopom, ki se uporablja za izračune stopenj dampinga – ki jih za določitev stopnje dajatev v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve lahko nadomestijo izračuni stopnje škode – se v zvezi z uvozom prek povezanih uvoznikov cena CIF konstruira na podlagi cene pri nadaljnji prodaji prvi neodvisni stranki, ki se ustrezno prilagodi v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Second and without prejudice to the latter observations, it should be noted that the methodology advocated by CeDo would lead to the inevitable use of prices relating to the Union production by CeDo of aluminium foil since, as mentioned above, the related importer/trader supplied the Union market with aluminium foil produced both in China and the Union.
Drugič, brez poseganja v prejšnja opažanja je treba omeniti, da bi metodologija, ki jo zagovarja skupina CeDo, neizogibno povzročila uporabo cen, povezanih s proizvodnjo aluminijastih folij skupine CeDo v Uniji, saj je, kot je navedeno zgoraj, povezani uvoznik/trgovec na trg Unije dobavljal aluminijaste folije, ki so bile proizvedene tako na Kitajskem kot v Uniji.
CeDo returned to the above issue at the definitive stage.
Skupina CeDo je to vprašanje ponovno izpostavila v zaključni fazi postopka.
It also requested to be heard by the Hearing Officer of the Directorate-General for Trade and a hearing was organised to discuss the matter.
Prav tako je v zvezi s tem zahtevala zaslišanje pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje GD za trgovino, ki je bilo tudi organizirano.
CeDo reiterated its previous arguments and also challenged the above explanation concerning Article 2(9), stating that Article 2(9) appears under the dumping provisions of the basic Regulation and could not be used by analogy for calculating injury.
Skupina CeDo je ponovila prejšnje argumente in hkrati oporekala zgornjemu pojasnilu v zvezi s členom 2(9), pri čemer je navedla, da je člen 2(9) med določbami o dampingu osnovne uredbe in ga zato ni mogoče po analogiji uporabljati za izračun škode v obravnavani zadevi.
The institutions pointed out that although Article 2 deals with dumping issues, Article 2(9) thereunder falls under the ‘export price’ subchapter and it gives guidance for calculating an export price in case of Union sales via a related importer.
Institucije so poudarile, da se člen 2 resda navezuje na vprašanja dampinga, vendar člen 2(9) spada v podpoglavje „izvozna cena“ ter daje navodila za izračun izvozne cene v primeru, ko prodaja izdelkov v Uniji poteka prek povezanega uvoznika.
No other provision in the basic Regulation gives more specific guidance in this regard.
V zvezi s tem nobena druga določba osnovne uredbe ne daje podrobnejših navodil.
CeDo raised the issue of the Kazchrome [4] judgment of the General Court which it alleged provided guidance in this respect by stating that the most accurate way of calculating price undercutting would be to compare import prices with the prices of goods of the Community industry by including all the costs incurred up until the customers’ premises.
Skupina CeDo je opozorila na sodbo Splošnega sodišča v zadevi Kazchrome [4], ki po njenem mnenju zagotavlja usmeritve v zvezi s tem, saj navaja, da je najnatančnejši način za izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen primerjava cen uvoženih izdelkov in cen izdelkov industrije Skupnosti, vključno z vsemi stroški za transport do obratov strank.
However, it should be noted that the Court also acknowledged that this approach is not practical and the judgment makes clear that CIF prices are an acceptable methodology in calculating injury margins.
Vendar pa je Sodišče hkrati priznalo, da ta pristop ni praktičen, in iz sodbe je jasno razvidno, da je uporaba cen CIF sprejemljiva metodologija za izračun stopenj škode.
In addition, the Kazchrome case related to a special situation involving goods which entered the EU market first through Lithuania (in transit) and then to Rotterdam where they were customs cleared.
Poleg tega se je zadeva Kazchrome navezovala na posebne okoliščine, v katerih so bili izdelki prvič vneseni na ozemlje EU v Litvi in so bili nato prepeljani v Rotterdam, kjer so bili carinjeni.
In that case, the Commission had decided to calculate undercutting and underselling on the basis of the price at the point of transit, as opposed to the price after customs clearance.
V navedenem primeru se je Komisija odločila izračunati stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih in ciljnih cen na podlagi cen na točki tranzita namesto cen po carinjenju.
This is not the case in the current investigation where it is not disputed that the underselling and the undercutting calculations are based on CeDo’s CIF price after customs clearance.
To pa ne velja v obravnavani preiskavi, saj izračuni nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih in ciljnih cen, ki temeljijo na cenah CIF skupine CeDo po carinjenju, niso sporni.
Furthermore, in the Kazchrome judgment the Court clearly restricted its conclusions to that specific case.
Poleg tega je Sodišče v svoji sodbi jasno navedlo, da se njegove ugotovitve nanašajo izključno na obravnavano zadevo.
CeDo also raised the issue of fair comparison and quoted two WTO Panel Reports [5].
Skupina CeDo je poleg tega zastavila vprašanje v zvezi s pošteno primerjavo in se je sklicevala na dve poročili ugotovitvenih svetov STO [5].
The institutions are satisfied that CeDo’s prices as established by the Commission services and the ex-works Union industry prices (both for undercutting and underselling) provide the basis of a fair and reasonable comparison.
Institucije so prepričane, da cene skupine CeDo, kakor so jih določile službe Komisije, in cene franko tovarna industrije Unije (za izračun nelojalnega nižanja tako prodajnih kot tudi ciljnih cen) tvorijo osnovo poštene in razumne primerjave.
It should be remembered that a perfect comparison would mean that only bids for the same contract should be taken into account because only then would the conditions of sale be identical.
Treba je spomniti, da bi idealna primerjava pomenila, da bi se upoštevale samo ponudbe za isto pogodbo, saj bi bili prodajni pogoji enaki samo v takem primeru.
As a perfect comparison is not possible here the institutions are satisfied that a methodology which uses average prices collected for similar products over the period of a one year IP is fair.
Ker idealna primerjava v obravnavanem primeru ni bila možna, so institucije prepričane, da njihova metodologija (ki uporablja povprečne cene za podobne proizvode v časovnem obdobju, ki ustreza obdobju enega leta OP) omogoča pošteno primerjavo.
That methodology has been clearly communicated by disclosure.
Ob razkritju je bila ta metodologija jasno opisana.