natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should be possible for a qualifying social entrepreneurship fund to be externally or internally managed.
Obstajati bi morala možnost notranjega ali zunanjega upravljanja kvalificiranega sklada za socialno podjetništvo.
Where a qualifying social entrepreneurship fund is internally managed, the fund is also the manager and should therefore comply with all relevant requirements for managers under this Regulation and be registered in accordance with this Regulation.
Pri notranjem upravljanju kvalificiranega sklada za socialno podjetništvo je sklad tudi upravitelj in bi moral zato izpolnjevati vse zadevne zahteve za upravitelje po tej uredbi in biti registriran v skladu s to uredbo.
A qualifying social entrepreneurship fund which is internally managed should not, however, be permitted to be the external manager of other collective investment undertakings or of undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS).
Vendar kvalificiranemu skladu za socialno podjetništvo z notranjim upravljanjem ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno, da deluje kot zunanji upravitelj drugih kolektivnih naložbenih podjemov ali podjemov za kolektivne naložbe v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP).
In order to clarify the relationship between this Regulation and other rules on collective investment undertakings and their managers, it is necessary to establish that this Regulation only apply to managers of collective investment undertakings other than UCITS falling within the scope of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations, and administrative provisions, relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) [4], which are established in the Union and are registered with the competent authority in their home Member State in accordance with Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers [5], provided that those managers manage portfolios of qualifying social entrepreneurship funds.
Za pojasnitev odnosa med to uredbo in drugimi pravili za kolektivne naložbene podjeme in njihove upravitelje je treba določiti, da se ta uredba uporablja le za upravitelje kolektivnih naložbenih podjemov, ki niso KNPVP iz področja uporabe Direktive 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP) [4], ki so bili ustanovljeni v Uniji in so registrirani pri pristojnem organu v matični državi članici v skladu z Direktivo 2011/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2011 o upraviteljih alternativnih investicijskih skladov [5], če ti upravitelji upravljajo portfelje kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo.
However, external managers of qualifying social entrepreneurship funds that are registered under this Regulation should also be allowed to manage UCITS, subject to authorisation under Directive 2009/65/EC.
Vendar bi morali zunanjim upraviteljem kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo, ki so registrirani v skladu s to uredbo, dovoliti tudi upravljanje KNPVP, če za to pridobijo dovoljenje v skladu z Direktivo 2009/65/ES.
The calculation of the threshold for the purposes of this Regulation is the same as for the threshold of point (b) of Article 3(2) of Directive 2011/61/EU.
Za namene te uredbe se prag izračuna na enak način kot prag iz točke (b) člena 3(2) Direktive 2011/61/EU.
However, managers registered in accordance with this Regulation and with assets under management that in total subsequently exceed the threshold referred to in point (b) of Article 3(2) of Directive 2011/61/EU, and that therefore become subject to authorisation with the competent authorities of their home Member State in accordance with Article 6 of that Directive, should be able to continue to use the designation ‘EuSEF’ in relation to the marketing of qualifying social entrepreneurship funds in the Union, provided that they comply with the requirements laid down in that Directive and that they continue to comply with certain requirements for the use of the designation ‘EuSEF’ specified in this Regulation at all times in relation to the qualifying social entrepreneurship fund.
Vendar pa bi morali imeti upravitelji, registrirani v skladu s to uredbo in katerih skupna upravljana sredstva naknadno presežejo prag iz točke (b) člena 3(2) Direktive 2011/61/EU ter zato potrebujejo dovoljenje pristojnih organov matične države članice v skladu s členom 6 navedene direktive, možnost še naprej uporabljati oznako „EuSEF“ v zvezi s trženjem kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo v Uniji, pod pogojem, da izpolnjujejo zahteve iz navedene direktive in v zvezi s kvalificiranimi skladi za socialno podjetništvo še naprej ves čas izpolnjujejo določene zahteve za uporabo oznake „EuSEF“ iz te uredbe.
This applies both to existing qualifying social entrepreneurship funds and to qualifying social entrepreneurship funds established after exceeding the threshold.
To velja tako za obstoječe kvalificirane sklade za socialno podjetništvo, kot za tiste, ki so ustanovljeni po prekoračitvi praga.
Where managers of collective investment undertakings do not wish to use the designation ‘EuSEF’ then this Regulation does not apply.
Kadar upravitelji kolektivnih naložbenih podjemov ne želijo uporabljati oznake „EuSEF“, se ta uredba ne uporablja.
In those cases, existing national rules and general Union rules should continue to apply.
V teh primerih se morala še naprej uporabljati veljavna nacionalna pravila in splošna pravila Unije.
This Regulation should establish uniform rules on the nature of qualifying social entrepreneurship funds, in particular on qualifying portfolio undertakings into which the qualifying social entrepreneurship funds are to be permitted to invest, and the investment instruments to be used.
Ta uredba bi morala določiti enotna pravila o značilnostih kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo, zlasti o kvalificiranih portfeljskih podjetjih, v katera bo dovoljeno vlaganje kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo, in naložbenih instrumentih, ki bodo uporabljeni.
This is necessary so that a clear demarcation line can be drawn between a qualifying social entrepreneurship fund and alternative investment funds that engage in other, less specialised, investment strategies, for example buyouts, which this Regulation is not seeking to promote.
To je potrebno za jasno razmejitev med kvalificiranim skladom za socialno podjetništvo in alternativnimi naložbenimi skladi, ki uporabljajo druge, manj specializirane naložbene strategije, na primer odkupe, ki jih ta uredba ne želi spodbujati.
In order to ensure the necessary clarity and certainty, this Regulation should also lay down uniform criteria to identify social undertakings as qualifying portfolio undertakings.
Za zagotavljanje potrebne jasnosti in zanesljivosti bi bilo treba s to uredbo določiti tudi enotna merila za opredelitev socialnih podjetij kot kvalificiranih portfeljskih podjetij.
A social undertaking should be defined as an operator in the social economy, the main objective of which is to have a social impact rather than to make a profit for its owners or shareholders.
Socialno podjetje bi moralo biti opredeljeno kot izvajalec dejavnosti v socialni ekonomiji, katerega glavni cilj je doseganje socialnega učinka, ne pa ustvarjanje dobička za lastnike in delničarje.
It operates by providing goods and services for the market and uses its profits primarily to achieve social objectives.
Deluje z zagotavljanjem izdelkov in storitev za trg, svoje dobičke pa uporablja pretežno za doseganje socialnih ciljev.
It is managed in an accountable and transparent manner, in particular, by involving employees, consumers and stakeholders that are affected by its commercial activities.
Upravlja se odgovorno in pregledno, predvsem z vključevanjem zaposlenih, potrošnikov in zainteresiranih strani, na katere vplivajo njegove komercialne dejavnosti.
As the principal objective of social undertakings is to have a positive social impact rather than to maximise profits this Regulation should only promote support for qualifying portfolio undertakings that have the achievement of a measurable and positive social impact as their focus.
Ker je glavni cilj socialnih podjetij doseganje pozitivnega socialnega učinka in ne povečevanje dobička, bi morala ta uredba spodbujati samo kvalificirana portfeljska podjetja, ki se osredotočajo na doseganje pozitivnega socialnega učinka, ki ga je mogoče izmeriti.
A measurable and positive social impact could include the provision of services to immigrants who are otherwise excluded, or the reintegration of marginalised groups into the labour market by providing employment, training or other support.
Izmerljiv in pozitiven socialni učinek bi lahko vključeval zagotavljanje storitev za priseljence, ki bi bili sicer izključeni, ali ponovno vključevanje marginaliziranih skupin na trg dela z zagotavljanjem zaposlitve, usposabljanja ali druge pomoči.
Social undertakings use their profits to achieve their primary social objective and are managed in an accountable and transparent way.
Socialna podjetja uporabljajo svoj dobiček za doseganje svojega glavnega socialnega cilja ter se upravljajo odgovorno in pregledno.
Where, on an exceptional basis, a qualifying portfolio undertaking wishes to distribute profits to its shareholders and owners, it should have predefined procedures and rules on how profits are to be distributed.
Kadar kvalificirano portfeljsko podjetje izjemoma želi dobiček razdeliti med svoje delničarje in lastnike, bi moralo imeti vnaprej določene postopke in pravila za razdelitev dobička.
Those rules should specify that such distribution of profits does not undermine the primary social objective of the qualifying social portfolio undertaking.
Ta pravila bi morala določati, da taka razdelitev dobička ne ogroža glavnega socialnega cilja kvalificiranega socialnega portfeljskega podjetja.
Social undertakings include a large range of undertakings, taking various legal forms, which provide social services or goods to vulnerable, marginalised, disadvantaged or excluded persons.
Socialna podjetja zajemajo zelo različna podjetja, imajo različne pravne oblike in zagotavljajo socialne storitve ali izdelke občutljivim, marginaliziranim, prikrajšanim ali izključenim osebam.
Such services include access to housing, healthcare, assistance for elderly or disabled persons, child care, access to employment and training as well as dependency management.
Take storitve vključujejo dostop do stanovanja, zdravstvene oskrbe, pomoči za starejše osebe ali invalide, otroškega varstva, zaposlitve in usposabljanja ter obvladovanje odvisnosti.
Social undertakings also include undertakings that employ a method of production of goods or services which embodies their social objective, but the activities of which be outside the realm of the provision of social goods or services.
Socialna podjetja vključujejo tudi podjetja, ki pri proizvodnji izdelkov ali storitev upoštevajo socialni cilj, pri čemer pa lahko njihove dejavnosti obsegajo tudi nesocialne izdelke ali storitve.
Those activities include social and professional integration by means of access to employment for people disadvantaged in particular by insufficient qualifications or social or professional problems leading to exclusion and marginalisation.
Te dejavnosti zajemajo socialno in poklicno vključenost z zagotavljanjem dostopa do zaposlitve za osebe, ki so prikrajšane zlasti zaradi nezadostnih kvalifikacij ali socialnih ali poklicnih težav, zaradi katerih so izključene in marginalizirane.
Those activities may also concern environmental protection with a societal impact, such as anti-pollution, recycling and renewable energy.
Te dejavnosti lahko obsegajo tudi varstvo okolja s socialnim učinkom, na primer z odpravljanjem onesnaževanja, recikliranjem in obnovljivimi viri energije.
In line with the aim of precisely circumscribing the collective investment undertakings which are to be covered by this Regulation and in order to ensure a focus on providing capital to social undertakings, qualifying social entrepreneurship funds should be deemed to be funds that intend to invest at least 70 % of their aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital in such undertakings.
V skladu s ciljem natančne opredelitve kolektivnih naložbenih podjemov, ki bodo zajeti s to uredbo, ter da se zagotovi osredotočenje na zagotavljanje kapitala socialnim podjetjem, bi morali kot kvalificirani skladi za socialno podjetništvo veljati skladi, ki nameravajo vsaj 70 % svojih združenih kapitalskih vložkov in neporabljenega kapitala na vpoklic vložiti v taka podjetja.
Qualifying social entrepreneurship funds should not be permitted to invest more than 30 % of their aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital in assets other than qualifying investments.
Kvalificiranim skladom za socialno podjetništvo ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno, da več kot 30 % svojih združenih kapitalskih vložkov in neporabljenega kapitala na vpoklic vložijo v sredstva, ki niso kvalificirane naložbe.
This means that whereas the 30 % threshold should be the maximum limit for non-qualifying investments at all times, the 70 % threshold should be reserved for qualifying investments during the life of the qualifying social entrepreneurship fund.
To pomeni, da bi bilo treba v življenjski dobi kvalificiranega sklada za socialno podjetništvo 70 % prag rezervirati za kvalificirane naložbe, 30 % prag pa bi moral biti zgornja meja za nekvalificirane naložbe.
Those thresholds should be calculated on the basis of amounts investible after deduction of all relevant costs and holdings of cash and cash equivalents.
Ta praga bi bilo treba izračunati na podlagi zneskov, ki jih je mogoče vložiti po odbitku vseh ustreznih stroškov, ter deležev v denarnih sredstvih in njihovih ustreznikih.
This Regulation should set out the details necessary for the calculation of the referred investment thresholds.
Ta uredba bi morala določati podrobnosti, potrebne za izračun pragov.
The purpose of this Regulation is to enhance the growth of social undertakings in the Union.
Namen te uredbe je spodbuditi rast socialnih podjetij v Uniji.
Investments in qualifying portfolio undertakings established in third countries can bring more capital to qualifying social entrepreneurship funds and can thereby benefit social undertakings in the Union.
Naložbe v kvalificirana portfeljska podjetja s sedežem v tretjih državah lahko kvalificiranim skladom za socialno podjetništvo prinesejo več kapitala ter s tem koristijo socialnim podjetjem v Uniji.
However, under no circumstances should this Regulation benefit investments made in portfolio undertakings established in third countries characterised by a lack of appropriate cooperation arrangements between the competent authorities of the home Member State of the manager of the qualifying social entrepreneurship fund and with each other Member State in which the units or shares of the qualifying social entrepreneurship fund are intended to be marketed or by a lack of effective exchange of information in tax matters.
Vendar ta uredba v nobenem primeru ne bi smela koristiti naložbam v portfeljska podjetja, ustanovljena v tretjih državah, za katere je značilno pomanjkanje ustreznih dogovorov o sodelovanju med pristojnimi organi matične države članice upravitelja kvalificiranega sklada za socialno podjetništvo in z vsako drugo državo članico, v katerih so enote ali deleži kvalificiranega sklada za socialno podjetništvo namenjeni trženju, ali pomanjkanje učinkovite izmenjave informacij pri davčnih zadevah.
A qualifying social entrepreneurship fund should, as a first step, be established in the Union in order to be entitled to use the designation ‘EuSEF’ as established by this Regulation.
Kvalificiran sklad za socialno podjetništvo bi moral najprej biti ustanovljen v Uniji, da bi lahko uporabljal oznako „EuSEF“, kot jo določa ta uredba.
The Commission should, within two years of the date of application of this Regulation, review the limitation on the use of the designation ‘EuSEF’ to funds established in the Union, taking into account experience of applying the Commission Recommendation regarding measures intended to encourage third countries to apply minimum standards of good governance in tax matters.
Komisija bi morala v dveh letih od datuma začetka uporabe te uredbe pregledati omejitev uporabe oznake „EuSEF“ za sklade, ustanovljene v Uniji, ob upoštevanju izkušenj pri uporabi priporočila Komisije glede ukrepov, namenjenih spodbujanju tretjih držav k uporabi minimalnih standardov dobrega upravljanja pri davčnih zadevah.
Managers of social entrepreneurship funds should be able to attract additional capital commitments during the life of a fund.
Upravitelji skladov za socialno podjetništvo bi morali biti sposobni med življenjsko dobo sklada privabljati dodatne kapitalske zaveze.
Such additional capital commitments during the life of the qualifying social entrepreneurship fund should be taken into account when the next investment in assets other than qualifying assets is contemplated.
Take dodatne kapitalske zaveze med življenjsko dobo kvalificiranega sklada za socialno podjetništvo bi bilo treba upoštevati pri razmisleku o naslednji naložbi v sredstva, ki niso kvalificirana.
Additional capital commitments should be permitted in accordance with criteria and subject to conditions set out in the qualifying social entrepreneurship fund’s rules or instruments of incorporation.
Dodatne kapitalske zaveze bi morale biti dovoljene v skladu z merili in pod pogoji iz pravil upravljanja ali ustanovnega akta kvalificiranega sklada za socialno podjetništvo.
Taking into account the specific funding needs of social undertakings, it is necessary to achieve clarity regarding the types of instruments that a qualifying social entrepreneurship fund should use for such funding.
Ob upoštevanju specifičnih potreb socialnih podjetij po financiranju je treba doseči jasnost v zvezi z vrstami instrumentov, ki bi jih moral kvalificirani sklad za socialno podjetništvo uporabljati za tako financiranje.
Therefore, this Regulation lays down uniform rules on the eligible instruments to be used by a qualifying social entrepreneurship fund when making investments, which include equity and quasi-equity instruments, debt instruments, such as promissory notes and certificates of deposit, investments into other qualifying social entrepreneurship funds, secured or unsecured loans, and grants.
Zato ta uredba določa enotna pravila o upravičenih instrumentih, ki jih kvalificirani sklad za socialno podjetništvo uporablja pri vlaganjih in ki zajemajo lastniške in navidezne lastniške instrumente, dolžniške instrumente, kot so zadolžnice in potrdila o vlogah, naložbe v druge kvalificirane sklade za socialno podjetništvo, zavarovana ali nezavarovana posojila in nepovratna sredstva.
To prevent dilution of the investments into qualifying portfolio undertakings, qualifying social entrepreneurship funds should only be permitted to invest in other qualifying social entrepreneurship funds where those other qualifying social entrepreneurship funds have not themselves invested more than 10 % of their aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital into other qualifying social entrepreneurship funds.
Da bi preprečili zmanjšanje vrednosti naložb v kvalificirana portfeljska podjetja, bi morale biti kvalificiranemu skladu za socialno podjetništvo dovoljene le naložbe v druge kvalificirane sklade za socialno podjetništvo, kadar ti drugi kvalificirani skladi za socialno podjetništvo niso sami vložili več kot 10 % svojih združenih kapitalskih vložkov in neporabljenega kapitala na vpoklic v druge kvalificirane sklade za socialno podjetništvo.
The core activities of qualifying social entrepreneurship funds are to provide financing to social undertakings through primary investments.
Osrednja dejavnost kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo je zagotavljanje sredstev socialnim podjetjem z neposrednimi naložbami.
Qualifying social entrepreneurship funds should neither participate in systemically important banking activities outside of the usual prudential regulatory framework (so-called ‘shadow banking’) nor follow typical private equity strategies, such as leveraged buyouts.
Kvalificirani skladi za socialno podjetništvo ne bi smeli niti sodelovati v sistemsko pomembnih bančnih dejavnostih zunaj običajnega bonitetnega zakonodajnega okvira (tako imenovano „bančništvo v senci“) niti uporabljati običajnih strategij zasebnega kapitala, kot so odkupi z vzvodom.
To maintain the necessary flexibility in its investment portfolio, qualifying social entrepreneurship funds should be able to invest in assets other than qualifying investments to the extent that those other investments do not exceed the 30 % threshold for non-qualifying investments.
Za ohranjanje potrebne prožnosti v svojem naložbenem portfelju bi moralo biti kvalificiranim skladom za socialno podjetništvo omogočeno, da vlagajo v sredstva, ki niso kvalificirane naložbe, če te naložbe ne presegajo 30-odstotnega praga za nekvalificirane naložbe.
Holdings of cash and cash equivalents should not be taken into account for the calculation of that threshold because such holdings are not to be considered as investments.
Deleži v denarnih sredstvih in njihovih ustreznikih se pri izračunu te meje ne bi smeli upoštevati, saj se ti deleži ne obravnavajo kot naložbe.
Qualifying social entrepreneurship funds should invest in a manner consistent with their ethical investment strategy, for instance they should not undertake investments that finance the weapons industry, that risk breaches of human rights or that entail electronic waste-dumping.
Kvalificirani skladi za socialno podjetništvo bi morali vlagati s skladu s svojo strategijo etičnih naložb, tako na primer ne bi smeli vlagati v orožno industrijo, kjer lahko pride do kršitev človekovih pravic ali do odlaganja elektronskih odpadkov.
In order to ensure that the designation ‘EuSEF’ is reliable and easily recognisable for investors across the Union only managers of qualifying social entrepreneurship funds that comply with the uniform quality criteria as set out in this Regulation should be eligible to use the designation ‘EuSEF’ when marketing qualifying social entrepreneurship funds across the Union.
Za zagotovitev, da bo oznaka „EuSEF“ zanesljiva in lahko prepoznavna za vlagatelje v celotni Uniji, bi morali uporabo oznake „EuSEF“ pri trženju kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo po Uniji dovoliti le upraviteljem kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo, ki izpolnjujejo enotna merila kakovosti iz te uredbe.
In order to ensure that qualifying social entrepreneurship funds have a distinct and identifiable profile which is suited to their purpose, there should be uniform rules on the composition of the portfolio and on the investment techniques which are permitted for such funds.
Za zagotovitev ločenega in prepoznavnega profila kvalificiranih skladov za socialno podjetništvo, ki ustreza njihovemu namenu, bi bilo treba določiti enotna pravila o sestavi portfelja in naložbenih tehnikah, ki so dovoljene za take sklade.
In order to ensure that qualifying social entrepreneurship funds do not contribute to the development of systemic risks, and that such funds concentrate, in their investment activities, on supporting qualifying portfolio undertakings, the use of leverage at the level of the fund should not be permitted.
Za zagotovitev, da kvalificirani skladi za socialno podjetništvo ne prispevajo k razvoju sistemskih tveganj ter da se taki skladi s svojimi naložbenimi dejavnostmi osredotočajo na podpiranje kvalificiranih portfeljskih podjetij, uporaba finančnih vzvodov na ravni sklada ne bi smela biti dovoljena.