natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘… Member States may, for a transitional period until the entry into force of any legal act following the review in accordance with Article 507, but not after 2 January 2029, fully or partially exempt the following exposures …’,
„…lahko države članice v prehodnem obdobju do začetka veljavnosti katerega koli pravnega akta, ki bo sledil pregledu v skladu s členom 507, vendar ne po 2 januarja 2029 v celoti ali delno izvzamejo naslednje izpostavljenosti…“
‘… Member States may, for a transitional period until the entry into force of any legal act following the review in accordance with Article 507, but not after 31 December 2028, fully or partially exempt the following exposures …’;
„…lahko države članice v prehodnem obdobju do začetka veljavnosti katerega koli pravnega akta, ki bo sledil pregledu v skladu s členom 507, vendar ne po 31. decembru 2028 v celoti ali delno izvzamejo naslednje izpostavljenosti…“.
on page 285, Article 501(4):
Stran 285, člen 501(4):
The Commission shall by 2 January 2017, report on the impact of the own funds requirements laid down in this Regulation on lending to SMEs and natural persons …’,
Komisija do 2. januarja 2017 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o učinku kapitalskih zahtev, določenih v tej uredbi, na kreditiranje MSP ter fizičnih oseb, pri čemer po potrebi predloži zakonodajni predlog.“
The Commission shall by 28 June 2016 report on the impact of the own funds requirements laid down in this Regulation on lending to SMEs and natural persons …’;
Komisija do 28. junija 2016 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o učinku kapitalskih zahtev, določenih v tej uredbi, na kreditiranje MSP ter fizičnih oseb, pri čemer po potrebi predloži zakonodajni predlog.“
on page 291, Article 515(1):
Stran 291, člen 515(1):
EBA, together with ESMA, shall by 2 January 2015 report on the functioning of this Regulation with the related obligations under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 …’,
EBA skupaj z ESMA do 2. januarja 2015 poroča o njenem izvajanju in izvajanju zadevnih obveznosti iz Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012, …“
EBA, together with ESMA, shall by 28 June 2014 report on the functioning of this Regulation with the related obligations under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 …’;
EBA skupaj z ESMA do 28. junija 2014 poroča o izvajanju te uredbe in izvajanju zadevnih obveznosti iz Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012, …“.
on page 294, point (c) of Article 521(2):
Stran 294, točka (c) člena 521(2):
the provisions of this Regulation that require the ESAs to submit to the Commission draft technical standards and the provisions of this Regulation that empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts or implementing acts, which shall apply from 31 December 2014.’,
določb te uredbe, na podlagi katerih ESA Komisiji predložiti osnutek tehničnih standardov in določb te uredbe, s katerimi se na Komisijo prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih ali izvedbenih aktov, ki se uporabljajo od 31. decembra 2014.“
the provisions of this Regulation that require the ESAs to submit to the Commission draft technical standards and the provisions of this Regulation that empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts or implementing acts, which shall apply from 28 June 2013.’.
določb te uredbe, na podlagi katerih ESA Komisiji predložiti osnutek tehničnih standardov in določb te uredbe, s katerimi se na Komisijo prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih ali izvedbenih aktov, ki se uporabljajo od 28. junija 2013.“
Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 576/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the non-commercial movement of pet animals and repealing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003
o netrgovskih premikih hišnih živali in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) and point (b) of Article 168(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 43(2) in točke (b) člena 168(4) Pogodbe,
Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] lays down the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals into a Member State from another Member State or from third countries and the checks applicable to such movement.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] so določene zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki se uporabljajo pri netrgovskih premikih hišnih živali v državo članico iz druge države članice ali tretjih držav, in v zvezi s pregledi, ki se pri takih premikih uporabljajo.
It aims to ensure a sufficient level of safety with regard to the public and animal health risks involved in such non-commercial movement and to remove any unjustified obstacles to such movement.
Cilj navedene uredbe je zagotoviti zadostno raven varnosti v zvezi s tveganji za javno zdravje in zdravje živali, ki se pojavljajo pri takih netrgovskih premikih, ter odpraviti kakršne koli neupravičene ovire za take premike.
In a statement annexed to Regulation (EU) No 438/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals [4], the Commission undertook to propose a revision of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 in its entirety, in particular the aspects of delegated and implementing acts.
Komisija je v izjavi, priloženi Uredbi (EU) št. 438/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 2010 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 o zahtevah v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki se uporabljajo za netrgovske premike hišnih živali [4], navedla, da namerava predlagati revizijo Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 v celoti, zlasti vidikov glede delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov.
Therefore, due to the entry into force of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the powers conferred on the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 need to be aligned with Articles 290 and 291 TFEU.
Zaradi začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je treba pooblastila, prenesena na Komisijo z Uredbo (ES) št. 998/2003, uskladiti s členoma 290 in 291 PDEU.
Taking into account the number of amendments that need to be made to the animal health requirements laid down in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 and in order to ensure that those requirements are sufficiently clear and accessible to the ordinary citizen, that Regulation should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.
Ker je glede zahtev v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali iz Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 potrebnih več sprememb in da se zagotovi zadostna jasnost in dostopnost navedenih zahtev za običajnega državljana, bi bilo treba navedeno uredbo razveljaviti in nadomestiti s to uredbo.
This Regulation should establish a list of animal species to which harmonised animal health requirements should apply when animals of those species are kept as pet animals and are subject to non-commercial movement.
V tej uredbi bi bilo treba določiti seznam živalskih vrst, za katere bi bilo treba uporabljati harmonizirane zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, kadar so živali teh vrst hišne živali in so predmet netrgovskih premikov.
When drawing up that list, account should be taken of their susceptibility to or role in the epidemiology of rabies.
Pri pripravi navedenega seznama bi bilo treba upoštevati njihovo dovzetnost za steklino ali vlogo pri epidemiologiji stekline.
Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC [5] establishes, inter alia, the animal health requirements applicable to trade in and imports of dogs, cats and ferrets, which are animals of species susceptible to rabies.
V Direktivi Sveta 92/65/EGS z dne 13. julija 1992 o zahtevah zdravstvenega varstva živali za trgovino in za uvoz v Skupnost živali, semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov, za katere ne veljajo zahteve zdravstvenega varstva živali, določene v posebnih pravilih Skupnosti iz Priloge A(I) k Direktivi 90/425/EGS [5], so med drugim določene zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki se uporabljajo za trgovino s psmi, mačkami in belimi dihurji, ki so živali vrst, dovzetnih za steklino, in njihov uvoz.
Since those species are also kept as pet animals that frequently accompany their owner or an authorised person during non-commercial movement within and into the Union, this Regulation should lay down the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of those species into Member States.
Ker so te vrste živali hkrati tudi hišne živali, ki pogosto spremljajo svojega lastnika ali pooblaščeno osebo med netrgovskimi premiki znotraj Unije in v Unijo, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki bi se uporabljale za netrgovske premike teh vrst živali v države članice.
Those species should be listed in Part A of Annex I to this Regulation.
Te vrste živali bi morale biti navedene na seznamu v delu A Priloge I k tej uredbi.
Similarly, a legal framework should be established for the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of animals of species not affected by rabies or of no epidemiological significance as regards rabies, to which, if they were not kept as pet animals, other legal acts of the Union would apply, including legislation on food-producing animals.
Podobno bi bilo treba določiti pravni okvir za zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki bi se uporabljale za netrgovske premike živalskih vrst, ki ne obolevajo za steklino ali nimajo epidemiološkega pomena glede stekline in za katere bi se, če ne bi bile hišne živali, uporabljali drugi pravni akti Unije, vključno z zakonodajo o živalih za proizvodnjo živil.
Those species should be listed in Part B of Annex I.
Te živalske vrste bi morale biti navedene na seznamu v delu B Priloge I.
The list in Part B of Annex I should include invertebrates, with the exception of bees and bumble bees covered by Directive 92/65/EEC, and molluscs and crustaceans covered by Council Directive 2006/88/EC of 24 October 2006 on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals [6].
V seznam v delu B Priloge I bi bilo treba vključiti nevretenčarje, razen čebel in čmrljev,zajetih v Direktivi 92/65/EGS, ter mehkužcev in rakov, zajetih v Direktivi Sveta 2006/88/ES z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in proizvodov iz ribogojstva ter o preprečevanju in nadzoru nekaterih bolezni pri vodnih živalih [6].
It should also include ornamental aquatic animals reared in non-commercial aquaria excluded from the scope of Directive 2006/88/EC, and amphibians and reptiles.
Prav tako bi bilo treba vključiti okrasne vodne živali, gojene v nekomercialnih akvarijih, ki so izključene iz področja uporabe Direktive 2006/88/ES, ter dvoživke in plazilce.
The list in Part B of Annex I should further include all species of birds, other than those covered by Council Directive 2009/158/EC of 30 November 2009 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs [7], and rodents and rabbits other than those intended for the production of food and defined in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin [8].
V seznam v delu B Priloge I bi bilo treba vključiti tudi vse vrste ptic, razen tistih, ki so zajete v Direktivi Sveta 2009/158/ES z dne 30. novembra 2009 o pogojih zdravstvenega varstva živali, ki veljajo znotraj Skupnosti za trgovanje s perutnino in valilnimi jajci ter za njihov uvoz iz tretjih držav [7], ter glodavce in kunce, razen tistih za proizvodnjo hrane, opredeljenih v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora [8].
However, in the interest of consistency of Union law, pending the establishment of Union rules governing the non-commercial movement into a Member State from another Member State or from a territory or a third country of pet animals of the species listed in Part B of Annex I, it should be possible for national rules to apply to such movement provided that they are not stricter than those applied to movement for commercial purposes.
Zaradi doslednosti prava Unije pa bi do uvedbe pravil Unije, ki bi urejala netrgovske premike hišnih živali vrst s seznama v delu B Priloge I v državo članico iz druge države članice ali z ozemlja ali iz tretje države, moralo biti mogoče, da se za take premike uporabljajo nacionalna pravila, pod pogojem, da niso strožja od pravil, ki se uporabljajo za premike v trgovske namene.
Since animals of the species listed in Part B of Annex I to this Regulation may belong to species that require particular protection, this Regulation should apply without prejudice to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein [9].
Ker živali vrst s seznama v delu B Priloge I k tej uredbi lahko spadajo med vrste, ki jih je treba posebej zavarovati, bi bilo treba to uredbo uporabljati brez poseganja v Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 338/97 z dne 9. decembra 1996 o varstvu prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst z zakonsko ureditvijo trgovine z njimi [9].
In order to make a clear distinction between the rules that apply to non-commercial movement and to trade in and imports into the Union from third countries of dogs, cats and ferrets covered by the animal health requirements of Directive 92/65/EEC, this Regulation should not only define a pet animal, but also the non-commercial movement of a pet animal, during which such a pet animal accompanies its owner or an authorised person.
Zaradi jasnega razlikovanja med pravili, ki se uporabljajo za netrgovske premike ter za trgovino in uvoz v Unijo iz tretjih držav psov, mačk in belih dihurjev, za katere veljajo zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali iz Direktive 92/65/EGS, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi opredeliti ne samo pojem hišne živali, temveč tudi pojem netrgovskih premikov hišne živali, pri katerih taka hišna žival spremlja svojega lastnika ali pooblaščeno osebo.
Experience has shown that it is not always possible for the pet animal to be in the immediate vicinity of the owner or authorised person at all times during non-commercial movement.
Izkušnje kažejo, da med netrgovskim premikom ni vedno mogoče zagotoviti, da se hišna žival ves čas nahaja v neposredni bližini lastnika ali pooblaščene osebe.
On duly justified and documented grounds, the pet animal should be considered as accompanying its owner or the authorised person even if the non-commercial movement of the pet animal takes place up to five days earlier or later than the movement of the owner or of the authorised person, or takes place in a different physical location than that occupied by the owner or by the authorised person.
V ustrezno utemeljenih in dokumentiranih primerih bi moralo veljati, da hišna žival spremlja svojega lastnika ali pooblaščeno osebo, tudi če se netrgovski premik hišne živali opravi do pet dni pred ali po premiku lastnika ali pooblaščene osebe, ali je prostorsko ločen od lokacije lastnika ali pooblaščene osebe.
Experience with the application of the existing rules shows that trade in and imports into the Union from third countries of pet animals of the species listed in Part A of Annex I can be fraudulently disguised as non-commercial movement.
Glede na izkušnje z uporabo obstoječih pravil je trgovanje s hišnimi živalmi vrst s seznama v delu A Priloge I in njihov uvoz v Unijo iz tretjih držav mogoče goljufivo prikazati kot netrgovski premik.
In order to prevent such practices, since they might pose animal health risks, this Regulation should fix a maximum number of pet animals of the species listed in Part A of Annex I that may accompany their owner or an authorised person.
Da bi preprečili take prakse, ki bi lahko pomenile tveganja za zdravje živali, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti največje dovoljeno število hišnih živali vrst s seznama v delu A Priloge I, ki lahko spremljajo svojega lastnika ali pooblaščeno osebo.
However, it should be possible to exceed that maximum number under certain specified conditions.
Prekoračitev tega števila pa bi morala biti mogoča pod nekaterimi posebej določenimi pogoji.
Further, it should be clarified that when the specified conditions are not fulfilled and the number of pet animals of the species listed in Part A of Annex I to this Regulation exceeds the established maximum number, the relevant provisions of Directive 92/65/EEC and of Directive 90/425/EEC [10] or Directive 91/496/EEC [11] apply to those pet animals.
Treba bi bilo tudi jasno navesti, da se, če posebej določeni pogoji niso izpolnjeni in število hišnih živali vrst s seznama v delu A Priloge I k tej uredbi presega največje dovoljeno število, za te hišne živali uporabljajo ustrezne določbe iz Direktive 92/65/EGS in Direktive 90/425/EGS [10] ali Direktive 91/496/EGS [11].
Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provides that, for a transitional period, pet animals of the species listed in Parts A and B of Annex I thereto are to be regarded as identified when they bear either a clear readable tattoo or an electronic identification system (‘transponder’).
V Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003 je določeno, da se v prehodnem obdobju za hišne živali vrst s seznamov v delih A in B Priloge I k navedeni uredbi šteje, da so identificirane, če nosijo jasno čitljivo tetovirano znamenje ali elektronski identifikacijski sistem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: transponder).
This Regulation should therefore lay down rules for the marking of pet animals of the species listed in Part A of Annex I to this Regulation after expiry of the transitional period on 3 July 2011.
V tej uredbi bi bilo zato treba določiti pravila za označevanje hišnih živali vrst s seznama v delu A Priloge I k tej uredbi po poteku prehodnega obdobja 3. julija 2011.
The implantation of a transponder is an invasive intervention and certain qualifications are required to carry it out.
Vsaditev transponderja je invaziven poseg, za opravljanje katerega se zahteva določena usposobljenost.
Transponders should therefore be implanted only by a suitably qualified person.
Transponderje bi zato morale vsajevati samo ustrezno usposobljene osebe.
If a Member State allows a person other than veterinarians to implant transponders, it should lay down rules on the minimum qualifications required for such a person.
Če je v državi članici dovoljeno, da vsaditev transponderjev opravlja oseba, ki ni veterinar, bi država članica morala določiti pravila o zahtevani minimalni usposobljenosti take osebe.
Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 sets out technical requirements for the identification of pet animals by transponders.
V Prilogi Ia k Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003 so določene tehnične zahteve za identifikacijo hišnih živali s transponderjem.
Those technical requirements correspond to internationally accepted standards and should be set out, without any substantial amendments being made to them, in Annex II to this Regulation.
Te tehnične zahteve ustrezajo mednarodno sprejetim standardom in bi jih bilo treba brez kakršnih koli bistvenih sprememb določiti v Prilogi II k tej uredbi.
In order to protect public health and the health of pet animals of the species listed in Annex I, this Regulation should provide for the possibility to adopt preventive health measures for diseases and infections other than rabies.
Zaradi varovanja javnega zdravja in zdravja hišnih živali vrst s seznama v Prilogi I bi bilo treba v tej uredbi predvideti možnost, da se sprejmejo tudi zdravstveni ukrepi za preprečevanje bolezni in okužb, ki niso steklina.
Those measures should be based on validated scientific information and applied proportionately to the risk to public or animal health associated with the non-commercial movement of those pet animals likely to be affected by those diseases or infections.
Ti ukrepi bi morali temeljiti na potrjenih znanstvenih podatkih, njihova uporaba pa bi morala biti sorazmerna s tveganjem za javno zdravje ali zdravje živali, povezanim z netrgovskimi premiki hišnih živali, ki bi lahko zbolele za temi boleznimi ali okužbami.
The measures should include rules for the categorisation of Member States or parts thereof, procedures under which Member States that require the application of preventive health measures should substantiate the rationale for such measures on a continuous basis, conditions for applying and documenting the preventive health measures and, where appropriate, conditions for derogating from the application of those measures.
Ti ukrepi bi morali vključevati pravila za kategorizacijo držav članic ali njihovih delov, postopke, v skladu s katerimi bi morale države članice, ki zahtevajo uporabo preventivnih zdravstvenih ukrepov, stalno utemeljevati razloge za take ukrepe, pogoje v zvezi z uporabo in dokumentiranjem preventivnih zdravstvenih ukrepov ter po potrebi pogoje za odstopanje od uporabe teh ukrepov.
A list of Member States or parts thereof categorised pursuant to the relevant rules should therefore be set out in an implementing act to be adopted pursuant to this Regulation.
Zato bi bilo prav tako treba zagotoviti, da se z izvedbenim aktom, ki se sprejme na podlagi te uredbe, določi seznam držav članic ali njihovih delov, kategoriziranih v skladu z zadevnimi pravili.
It is possible that rabies vaccines administered to pet animals of the species listed in Part A of Annex I before the age of three months do not induce protective immunity due to competition with maternal antibodies.
Možno je, da cepiva proti steklini, s katerimi so pred tretjim mesecem starosti cepljene hišne živali vrst s seznama v delu A Priloge I, zaradi sočasnega delovanja maternalnih protiteles ne zagotovijo zaščitne imunosti.
Consequently, vaccine manufacturers recommend not to vaccinate young pet animals before that age.
Proizvajalci cepiv zato ne priporočajo cepljenja mladih hišnih živali pred navedeno starostjo.
Therefore, in order to authorise the non-commercial movement of young pet animals of the species listed in Part A of Annex I that have not been vaccinated, or that have been vaccinated, but have not yet acquired protective immunity against rabies, this Regulation should establish certain precautionary measures to be taken and give the Member States the possibility to authorise such movement into their territory when young pet animals comply with those measures.
V zvezi z odobritvijo netrgovskih premikov mladih živali vrst s seznama v delu A Priloge I, ki niso bile cepljene ali so bile cepljene, niso pa še razvile zaščitne imunosti proti steklini, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti nekatere previdnostne ukrepe, ki bi jih bilo treba izvesti, državam članicam pa dati možnost, da take premike na njihovo ozemlje odobrijo, kadar mlade hišne živali izpolnjujejo zahteve iz teh ukrepov.
In order to simplify the conditions for the non-commercial movement of pet animals of the species listed in Part A of Annex I between Member States of equivalent favourable status with regard to rabies, this Regulation should also provide for the possibility to derogate from the anti-rabies vaccination requirement.
Da bi poenostavili pogoje za netrgovske premike hišnih živali vrst s seznama v delu A Priloge I med državami članicami z enako pozitivnim stanjem glede stekline, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi tudi predvideti možnost odstopanja od zahteve cepljenja proti steklini.
Such a possibility should be available upon submission of a joint application by the Member States interested.
Taka možnost bi morala biti na voljo ob vložitvi skupne prošnje zainteresiranih držav članic.