natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
further notes that this figure represents just over 1 % of the Union’s budget and amounts to 20 % of the amount of EUR 8454 million set aside for the 2011 administrative expenditure of the Union institutions as a whole, in line with the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da ta znesek predstavlja le nekaj več kot 1 % proračuna Unije in 20 % zneska v višini 8454 milijonov EUR, namenjenega upravnim odhodkom vseh evropskih institucij za leto 2011, v skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju;
Welcomes the fact that no mopping-up transfers took place between 2011 and 2012;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da med letoma 2011 in 2012 ni bilo prenosov neizkoriščenih sredstev;
calls again on its administration to pursue the objective of better and clearer budget planning and discipline and that, in the interests of budgetary clarity, buildings expenditure, or any other expenditure of similar size, be entered individually in the budget rather than being financed through underspends;
ponovno poziva svojo upravo, naj si prizadeva za boljše in preglednejše proračunsko načrtovanje in disciplino, ter zahteva, da se zaradi proračunske jasnosti odhodki za zgradbe in drugi odhodki podobnega obsega vnesejo v proračun posamezno, namesto da se financirajo z neporabljenimi sredstvi;
Notes that, in 2011, the four chief headings of the Parliament’s budget were ‘officials and temporary staff’, ‘buildings and associated costs’, ‘Members and expenditure relating to parliamentary assistance’, accounting for 70 % of the total commitments;
ugotavlja, da so bile leta 2011 štiri največje postavke proračuna Parlamenta naslednje: „Uradniki in začasni uslužbenci“, „Nepremičnine in z njimi povezani stroški“, „Poslanci“ in „Izdatki za parlamentarno pomoč“, in sicer so predstavljale 70 % vseh obveznosti;
Recalls that the amount of EUR 85,9 million repaid by Belgium to Parliament at the beginning of 2010 and earmarked for building projects is to be considered as external assigned revenue under Article 21 of the Financial Regulation;
opozarja, da se znesek v višini 85,9 milijona EUR, ki ga je Belgija poplačala Evropskemu parlamentu v začetku leta 2010 in je rezerviran za gradbene projekte, opredeli kot zunanji namenski prejemek v skladu s členom 21 finančne uredbe.
Parliament’s accounts
Računovodski izkazi Parlamenta
Notes that in his certification of the final accounts, Parliament’s accounting officer has stated his reasonable assurance that the accounts present a true and fair view of the financial position of Parliament in all material respects;
ugotavlja, da je računovodja Parlamenta po pregledu končnih računovodskih izkazov navedel, da ima razumno zagotovilo, da izkazi predstavljajo resnično in pošteno sliko finančnega stanja Parlamenta v vseh pomembnih vidikih;
notes further his statement that no issues requiring a reservation have been brought to his attention;
ugotavlja tudi, da po mnenju računovodje ni vprašanj, ki bi zahtevala pridržek;
Recalls the decision by its President concerning the adoption of the accounts for the financial year 2011 on 11 July 2012;
opozarja na sklep svojega predsednika z dne 11. julija 2012 o sprejetju računovodskih izkazov za proračunsko leto 2011;
Statement of assurance by the Secretary-General
Izjava generalnega sekretarja o zanesljivosti
Welcomes the Secretary-General’s statement, dated 24 April 2012, in his capacity as Principal Authorising Officer by Delegation, concerning the authorising officers’ annual activity reports for 2011, in which he certifies that he has a reasonable assurance that Parliament’s budget has been implemented in accordance with the principles of sound financial management and that the control framework put in place provides the necessary guarantees as to the legality and regularity of the underlying operations;
pozdravlja izjavo generalnega sekretarja z dne 24. aprila 2012 v njegovi vlogi glavnega pooblaščenega odredbodajalca, ki je v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za 2011 potrdil, da je prepričan, da je bil proračun Parlamenta izvršen v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in da vpeljani kontrolni okvir daje potrebna zagotovila o zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovanja;
Court of Auditors Annual Reports concerning the financial year 2011
Letna poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2011
Court of Auditors’ opinions
Mnenja Računskega sodišča
Welcomes the fact that the audit of the Court of Auditors found that the supervisory and control systems of administrative expenditure as a whole, that are required by the Financial Regulation, were effective and that the payments of administrative expenditure in 2011 were not affected by material errors;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Računsko sodišče pri reviziji ugotovilo, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za upravne odhodke kot celoto, ki jih zahteva finančna uredba, učinkoviti in da na plačila v okviru upravnih odhodkov leta 2011 niso bistveno vplivale napake;
Payment of social allowances and benefits to staff members
Izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov in prejemkov uslužbencem
Takes note of the specific finding concerning Parliament contained in the annual reports of the Court of Auditors for 2011, as well as Parliament’s replies, concerning the information available to the Parliament’s services on the personal and family situation of staff members was either not up-to-date or not properly processed and that in a single case, it led to overpayments;
je seznanjen s posebno ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča v zvezi s Parlamentom, ki jo je navedlo v letnih poročilih za leto 2011, da podatki o osebnih in družinskih razmerah uslužbencev, ki so na voljo službam Parlamenta, niso niti posodobljeni niti pravilno obdelani in da je to v enem od primerov privedlo do preplačil, ter z odgovori Parlamenta v zvezi s tem;
takes note that the recovery of overpayments began in that case in November 2011, and deductions were made from the pay of the staff member concerned;
je seznanjen, da se je novembra 2011 v zvezi s tem primerom začela izterjava preplačil, tj. z odbitki od plače zadevnega uslužbenca;
encourages, however, stricter controls to avoid overpayments in future;
vendar spodbuja strožji nadzor, da bi se v prihodnje izognili preplačilom;
Employment of accredited parliamentary assistants (APAs) rules
Pravila o zaposlovanju akreditiranih parlamentarnih pomočnikov
Takes note, furthermore, that under the Internal Rules for the employment of APAs, the latter are allowed to submit the medical certificate and other documents required for the conclusion of contracts within three months after the date on which the contract for their initial recruitment takes effect, and that since this derogation contradicts the provisions set out in Articles 128 and 129 of the CEOS, those articles should be brought into line with the rules applicable to accredited assistants;
je seznanjen, da lahko v skladu z notranjimi pravili o zaposlovanju akreditiranih parlamentarnih pomočnikov slednji predložijo zdravniško spričevalo in druge dokumente, potrebne za sklenitev pogodb, v treh mesecih po začetku veljavnosti prve pogodbe o zaposlitvi, in ugotavlja, da je to odstopanje v nasprotju z določbami členov 128 in 129 pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev, zaradi česar bi bilo treba ta člena uskladiti s pravili, ki se uporabljajo za akreditirane pomočnike;
also notes that, as regards compliance with the requirement concerning the knowledge of languages, in none of the 10 cases audited were there documents on file proving that checks had been performed;
ugotavlja tudi, da glede skladnosti z zahtevo o znanju jezikov v nobenem od desetih revidiranih primerov ni bilo dokumentov, ki bi dokazovali, da je bilo opravljeno preverjanje;
Endorses the responses given by Parliament in the contradictory procedure with the Court of Auditors;
sprejema odgovore Parlamenta v spornem postopku z Računskim sodiščem;
Performance of the ex-ante verification of recruitment procedures
Izvajanje predhodnega preverjanja postopkov zaposlovanja
Notes the Court of Auditors’ finding that, in those file procedures for the recruitment of APAs that were audited, there were no documents on file proving that the ex-ante checks of recruitment documents had been performed;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča, da pri revidiranih postopkih zaposlovanja akreditiranih parlamentarnih pomočnikov v spisih ni bilo dokumentov, ki bi dokazovali, da so bili opravljeni predhodni pregledi dokumentov, zahtevanih pri zaposlovanju;
notes the answer of Parliament’s relevant services that, after revision of checklists and the introduction of cross- checking, the underlying documentation for those verifications is now being kept;
je seznanjen z odgovorom ustreznih služb Parlamenta, da se bo po pregledu kontrolnih seznamov in uvedbi navzkrižnega preverjanja hranila dokumentacija o tem preverjanju;
Regrets that the Court of Auditors found weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria for 2 out of 10 procurement procedures of Parliament that it audited relating to the maintenance of buildings and to printing services;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo pomanjkljivosti pri uporabi izbirnih meril in meril za dodelitev pri dveh od desetih postopkov javnega naročanja Parlamenta, ki jih je revidiralo, in sicer na področju vzdrževanja stavb in tiskarskih storitev;
calls again on the Bureau to reconsider all control mechanisms for public procurement in order to guarantee the most competitive prices for the goods and services that are offered;
ponovno poziva predsedstvo, naj še enkrat preuči vse nadzorne mehanizme za javna naročila, da bi zagotovilo najbolj konkurenčne cene za ponujene storitve in blago;
Regrets that due to a reduction in administrative burden for low value contracts, aimed at increasing SME participation in tenders for these contracts, the administration does not dispose of the number of SMEs that secured low value contracts;
obžaluje, da zaradi zmanjšanja upravnega bremena v povezavi z naročili majhne vrednosti, katerega namen je bil povečati sodelovanje malih in srednje velikih podjetij v javnih razpisih za ta naročila, uprava nima podatkov o številu malih in srednje velikih podjetij, ki so ta naročila dobila;
therefore the Secretariat-General is not able to show whether or not the reduction in administrative burden actually led to an increased SME participation and thus the effectiveness of the measures taken;
ugotavlja, da zato generalni sekretariat ne more pokazati, ali je zmanjšanje upravnega bremena dejansko olajšalo sodelovanje malih in srednje velikih podjetij in ali so bili sprejeti ukrepi učinkoviti;
requests to monitor the number of SMEs that secured low value contracts;
zahteva, da se spremlja število malih in srednje velikih podjetij, ki so dobila naročila majhne vrednosti;
Hearing of the Internal Auditor and the Internal Auditor’s annual report
Predstavitev notranjega revizorja in njegovega letnega poročila
Notes that at the competent committee’s meeting with the Internal Auditor held on 22 January 2013, the Internal Auditor presented his annual report signed 26 July 2012, stating that, in 2011, he performed the following audit work on Parliament’s administration:
ugotavlja, da je notranji revizor na sestanku s pristojnim odborom 22. januarja 2013 predstavil svoje letno poročilo, ki je bilo podpisano 26. julija 2012, v katerem navaja, da je v letu 2011 opravil naslednje revizijsko delo v zvezi z upravo Parlamenta:
a specific review of the internal control framework,
poseben pregled okvira notranje kontrole,
a follow-up to the audit of the public procurement process in Directorate-General for the Presidency (DG Presidency),
spremljanje ukrepov po reviziji postopka za javna naročila v generalnem direktoratu predsedstva,
a follow-up to the audit of the parliamentary assistance allowance,
spremljanje ukrepov po reviziji nadomestila za parlamentarno pomoč,
a follow-up to the audit of the processing of payment requests,
spremljanje ukrepov po reviziji obdelave zahtevkov za plačilo,
an audit of the public procurement process and of contract implementation in Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support (DG ITEC),
revizijo postopka za javna naročila in izvajanja pogodb v generalnem direktoratu za inovacije in tehnološko podporo,
an audit of the Establishment of the Payroll,
revizijo določanja plačilne liste,
a follow-up to the audit of building policy:
spremljanje ukrepov po reviziji politike na področju nepremičnin:
planning, assessment & management of accommodation needs,
načrtovanje, ocenjevanje in upravljanje potreb po nastanitvi,
an audit of the public procurement process in Directorate-General for Communication (DG Communication);
revizijo postopka za javna naročila v generalnem direktoratu za komuniciranje,
Points out that among the more significant conclusions set out in the Internal Auditor’s annual report were the following:
poudarja, da so bili med sklepi, navedenimi v letnem poročilu notranjega revizorja, pomembnejši naslednji:
that the audit of Parliamentary Assistance Allowance revealed the need to strengthen the framework for the remuneration of privately employed local assistants, the number of which vary widely from Member to Member, and to obtain more assurance concerning the services rendered by service providers,
da je revizija nadomestila za parlamentarno pomoč razkrila, da je treba izboljšati okvir za izplačevanje prejemkov zasebno zaposlenim lokalnim pomočnikom, katerih število se od poslanca do poslanca močno razlikuje, in pridobiti zanesljivejša zagotovila v zvezi s storitvami, ki jih izvajajo ponudniki storitev,
that for certain directorates-generals’ procurement processes there is a need to better substantiate recourse to exceptional negotiated procedures and to ensure that the outcome of negotiation is based on documented analyses that are measurable against relevant value-for-money benchmarks,
da je treba za nekatere postopke javnih naročil generalnih direktoratov bolje utemeljiti uporabo izrednih postopkov s pogajanji in zagotoviti, da izid pogajanj temelji na dokumentiranih analizah, ki so primerljive z ustreznimi merili stroškovne učinkovitosti,
that in several occurrences the evaluation methodology applied for public procurement process was not sufficiently documented in the evaluation reports and minutes or it differed from that announced in the tender specifications and that the evaluation method defined in the specifications must give sufficient weighting to the price criterion in relation to other criteria and must ensure the use of the best ‘price-quality’ ratio;
da v več primerih metodologija za ocenjevanje, ki se je uporabljala za postopek javnih naročil, ni bila ustrezno dokumentirana v ocenjevalnih poročilih in zapisnikih, v nekaterih primerih pa se je razlikovala od metodologije, opredeljene v razpisnih specifikacijah, ter da mora metodologija za ocenjevanje, opredeljena v specifikacijah, ustrezno upoštevati merilo cene v povezavi z drugimi merili ter zagotavljati uporabo najboljšega razmerja med ceno in kakovostjo;
Notes and supports the views expressed by the Internal Auditor as to:
je seznanjen s stališči, ki jih je izrazil notranji revizor, in jih podpira, kar zadeva:
the importance, for certain departments, of implementing the new central guidelines on sensitive posts and risk management, of developing performance indicators, of completing the documentation of internal control and management procedures and of reducing delays in the regularisation of budgetary expenditure,
pomembnost (za nekatere oddelke) uporabe novih glavnih smernic za občutljiva delovna mesta in obvladovanje tveganja, razvoja kazalnikov uspešnosti, predložitve popolne dokumentacije postopkov notranje kontrole in poslovodenja ter zmanjšanja zamud pri ureditvi proračunskih odhodkov,
the importance of ensuring that, during a public procurement process, the evaluation committee fully, clearly and comprehensively substantiates its conclusions in its report and that the evaluation process is free from any indication of unequal treatment of the tenderers;
pomembnost zagotavljanja, da ocenjevalni odbor med postopkom javnih naročil v celoti, jasno in izčrpno utemelji svoje ugotovitve v poročilu ter da postopek ocenjevanja ne izkazuje neenakopravne obravnave ponudnikov;
Audit of the internal control framework
Revizija okvira notranje kontrole
Recalls that the original review of the internal control framework in 2003 and 2004 resulted in 14 audit reports covering all departments and the central services and containing 452 agreed actions aimed to improve the overall levels of:
opozarja, da je bilo na podlagi prvega pregleda okvira notranje kontrole leta 2003 in 2004 oblikovanih 14 revizijskih poročil, ki zajemajo vse oddelke in centralne službe ter vsebujejo 452 dogovorjenih ukrepov, namenjenih izboljšanju splošnih ravni:
compliance with the institution’s minimum standards of internal control,
skladnosti z minimalnimi standardi za notranjo kontrolo, ki jih je oblikovala institucija,
the achievement of the institution’s key control objectives (compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies; reliability of management information and recording; and the economy, effectiveness and efficiency of operations);
doseganja ključnih kontrolnih ciljev institucije (skladnost z veljavnimi zakoni, predpisi in politikami; zanesljivost informacij o upravljanju in evidentiranja; gospodarnost, učinkovitost in uspešnost operacij);
Remaining ‘open actions’
Preostali neizvedeni ukrepi
Recalls that successive follow-up audits of the implementation of 452 actions took place in 2005/2006 and 2007/2008 and, in one department with a high proportion of open actions, also in 2009;
opozarja, da je bilo v obdobjih 2005/2006 in 2007/2008 opravljenih več zaporednih revizij nadaljnjega ukrepanja glede izvajanja 452 ukrepov, v enem oddelku z visokim deležem neizvedenih ukrepov pa tudi leta 2009;
emphasises that the outcome of this series of audits was that 68 actions of the original review of the internal control framework remained open at the end of 2010;
poudarja, da je ta niz revizij pokazal, da je do konca leta 2010 ostalo neizvedenih 68 ukrepov, zajetih v prvem pregledu okvira notranje kontrole;
Notes with satisfaction that the Internal Audit Service continues to give priority to the review of the internal control framework initiated in 2003;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da služba za notranjo revizijo še vedno daje prednost pregledovanju okvira notranje kontrole, ki se je začelo leta 2003;
takes note of the fact that, as of 30 September 2011, after successive follow-up audits, 38 actions remained uncompleted out of the 452 actions initially agreed;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je po 30. septembru 2011 po zaporednih revizijah nadaljnjega ukrepanja ostalo neizvedenih 38 ukrepov od 452, kolikor jih je bilo dogovorjenih na začetku;
welcomes that fact that none of those actions is classified as critical by Internal Audit service;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da služba za notranjo revizijo nobenega od teh ukrepov ni uvrstila med kritične;
calls on the departmental and central management to implement the remaining 38 overdue ‘open actions’ before the end of the current legislative term;
poziva vodstvo oddelkov in centralnih služb, naj še pred koncem sedanjega zakonodajnega obdobja izvede preostalih 38 neizvedenih ukrepov;
Welcomes the fact that in June 2011, a firm of external assessors certified that the Internal Audit Service of the Parliament complies with the definition of Internal Auditing, with the Code of Ethics and with the Standards and that this represents the highest level of compliance;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je junija 2011 podjetje zunanjih ocenjevalcev potrdilo, da služba za notranjo revizijo Parlamenta upošteva opredelitev notranje revizije, etični kodeks in standarde, kar ustreza najstrožjim merilom skladnosti;
encourages the Internal Audit Service to build on the good foundation already in place and align the Internal Audit Service further with leading practices;
spodbuja službo za notranjo revizijo, naj se pri svojem delu opira na učinkovito podlago, ki je že vzpostavljena, ter ga še bolj uskladi z uveljavljenimi postopki;
acknowledges that during the second half of 2011, the Internal Audit Service already implemented several important elements of the suggestions for improvement received and that the remaining action plan was to be executed over the period through to the end of 2012;
priznava, da je služba za notranjo revizijo v drugi polovici leta 2011 izvedla že več pomembnih elementov prejetih predlogov za izboljšanje in da bo do konca leta 2012 izvedla preostali akcijski načrt;
Stresses that in line with transparency policies towards the citizens of the Union a summary of the number and type of internal audits carried out, the recommendations made and the action taken on those recommendations, should be made available after some time on the website of the Parliament;
poudarja, da bi moral biti v skladu s politiko preglednosti do državljanov Unije povzetek s številom in vrsto opravljenih notranjih revizij, danih priporočilih in ukrepih, sprejetih na njihovi podlagi, po določenem času objavljen na spletnem mestu Parlamenta;
would like to be informed which of those documents are not yet available to the public and the reasons why;
želi izvedeti, kateri od teh dokumentov še niso bili objavljeni in zakaj;
Follow-up by the Secretary-General to the 2010 discharge resolution
Nadaljnje ukrepanje generalnega sekretarja po resoluciji o razrešnici za leto 2010
Welcomes the written answers to the 2010 discharge resolution provided to the Committee on Budgetary Control on 16 November 2012;
pozdravlja pisne odgovore na resolucijo o razrešnici za leto 2010, ki jih je 16. novembra 2012 prejel Odbor za proračunski odbor;
regrets however that it was not possible to receive those answers before the start of the 2011 discharge exercise;
vendar obžaluje, da teh odgovorov ni bilo mogoče prejeti pred začetkom postopka razrešnice za leto 2011;
expects that, for the 2012 discharge exercise, it will be possible for an exchange of views between the Secretary-General and the Committee on Budgetary Control to take place before the end of October 2013;
pričakuje, da bo v postopku razrešnice za leto 2012 izmenjava mnenj med generalnim sekretarjem in Odborom za proračunski nadzor lahko potekala pred koncem oktobra 2013;
Welcomes the formal decision to discontinue the Prize for Journalism that in 2011 represented an expenditure of EUR 154205 as proposed by the Committee on Budgetary Control and voted in Plenary in the 2010 discharge report;
pozdravlja uradni sklep o odpravi nagrade za novinarstvo, ki je leta 2011 povzročila odhodke v višini 154205 EUR, ki jo je predlagal Odbor za proračunski odbor in ki je bila izglasovana na plenarnem zasedanju v okviru poročila o razrešnici za leto 2010;
acknowledges that contacts with journalists were reinforced in the Member States by organising thematic seminars in the capital cities, thereby using the Parliament’s existing administrative capacity, while providing journalists with an opportunity to exchange views with Members and to acquire a complete understanding of Parliament’s structure and role in the legislative process;
priznava, da so bili v državah članicah stiki z novinarji okrepljeni z organizacijo tematskih seminarjev v glavnih mestih, pri čemer so bile uporabljene obstoječe upravne zmogljivosti Parlamenta, tako da so lahko novinarji izmenjali mnenja s poslanci ter natančno spoznali strukturo Parlamenta in njegovo vlogo v zakonodajnem postopku;
Requests for the second time, after the first request relating to the discharge procedure was made in 2010, a full report on how Parliament’s Free Software projects have developed with regard to use and users in Parliament, citizen interaction and procurement activities;
že drugič zahteva, potem ko je podobno zahtevo glede postopka razrešnice postavil že leta 2010, celovito poročilo o usodi projektov brezplačne programske opreme Parlamenta, kar zadeva uporabo in uporabnike v Parlamentu, povezanost z državljani in javna naročila;