natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable percentage for selling, general and administrative expenses and a reasonable margin for profit, on the basis of actual data pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product, by the exporting producer under investigation in accordance with the first sentence of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da so se proizvodnim stroškom izvoženih vrst po potrebi dodali ustrezen odstotni delež za prodajo, splošni in upravni izdatki ter primerna stopnja dobička na podlagi dejanskih podatkov o proizvodnji in prodaji, ki jih je preiskovani proizvajalec izvoznik v skladu s prvim stavkom člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe uporabljal pri običajnem poteku trgovine s podobnim izdelkom.
In the previous interim review leading to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 366/2006, it was determined that price undertakings influenced the past export prices and made them unreliable for the determination of future export behaviour.
V prejšnjem vmesnem pregledu, na podlagi katerega je bila sprejeta Uredba (ES) 366/2006, je bilo določeno, da so cenovne zaveze vplivale na pretekle izvozne cene tako, da so slednje postale nezanesljiva podlaga za določitev prihodnjega gibanja izvoza.
In that interim review, given that Ester was selling the product concerned in substantial quantities on the world market, it was decided to establish the export price on the basis of prices actually paid or payable to all third countries.
Glede na to, da je družba Ester prodajala zadevni izdelek na svetovnem trgu v znatnih količinah, je bilo v navedenem vmesnem pregledu sklenjeno, da se izvozna cena določi na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo tretjim državam.
It is recalled that the acceptance of price undertakings was withdrawn in March 2006, i.e. more than three years before the current RIP.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bilo sprejetje cenovnih zavez umaknjeno marca 2006, tj. več kot tri leta pred sedanjim OPP.
Therefore, Ester’s export prices to the Union in the current RIP were not influenced by any price undertakings.
Na izvozne cene družbe Ester v Unijo v sedanjem OPP torej niso vplivale nobene cenovne zaveze.
It can be thus concluded that they can be considered reliable for the determination of future export behaviour.
Zato se lahko sklene, da se obravnavajo kot zanesljive za določitev prihodnjega gibanja izvoza.
Since all export sales of the applicant to the Union were made directly to independent customers, the export price was established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Ker so bili vložnikovi izdelki v Unijo izvoženi neposredno neodvisnim kupcem, so bile izvozne cene določene na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
In order to ensure a fair comparison between normal value and the export price, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which affected prices and price comparability.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike v dejavnikih, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen.
For this purpose, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made, where applicable and justified, for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, commissions, financial costs and packing costs paid by the applicant.
V ta namen so bile narejene ustrezne prilagoditve, kjer je bilo to potrebno in upravičeno, za razlike pri stroških prevoza, zavarovanja, manipuliranja, natovarjanja in drugih dodatnih stroških, stroških provizij, finančnih stroških ter stroških pakiranja, ki jih je plačal vložnik.
The applicant claimed that, compared to the previous interim review investigation, it is offering its customers a wider variation of chemical coatings and this aspect should be taken into account when classifying the product concerned into different product types.
Vložnik je trdil, da v primerjavi s prejšnjim vmesnim pregledom ponuja strankam večjo izbiro kemičnih premazov in ta vidik je treba upoštevati pri uvrstitvi zadevnega izdelka v različne vrste izdelkov.
However, the company did not demonstrate that the different types of chemical coatings affected price comparability and, in particular, that the customers consistently paid different prices on the domestic market and on the EU export market depending on the type of chemical coating.
Vendar pa družba ni dokazala, da so različne vrste kemičnih premazov vplivale na primerljivost cen in zlasti, da so stranke neprestano plačevale različne cene na domačem trgu in na izvoznem trgu EU glede na vrsto kemičnega premaza.
Therefore, the product classification applied in the previous investigations should be maintained and the claim must be rejected.
Zato je uvrstitev izdelkov iz prejšnjih preiskav treba ohraniti in trditev se mora zavrniti.
The applicant also claimed an adjustment on the export price, based on the benefits received upon exportation under the Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme (DEPB) on a post-export basis.
Vložnik je zahteval tudi prilagoditev izvozne cene, kar ustreza višini ugodnosti, ki so bile dodeljene za izvoz v okviru sheme „Duty Entitlement Passbook“ (DEPB) na podlagi poizvoza.
In this respect, it was found that under this scheme, the credits received when exporting the product concerned could be used to offset customs duties due on imports of any goods or could be freely sold to other companies.
V tem smislu je bilo ugotovljeno, da se lahko v okviru te sheme posojila, prejeta ob izvozu zadevnega izdelka, uporabijo za nadomestilo carine na uvoz kakršnega koli blaga, ali za prosto prodajo drugim družbam.
In addition, there is no constraint that the imported goods should only be used in the production of the exported product concerned.
Poleg tega ni omejitve, da se mora uvoženo blago uporabljati samo pri proizvodnji izvoznega zadevnega izdelka.
Ester did not demonstrate that the benefit under the DEPB scheme affected price comparability and, in particular, that the customers consistently paid different prices on the domestic market because of the DEPB scheme benefits.
Družba Ester ni dokazala, da je ugodnost v okviru sheme DEPB vplivala na primerljivost cen in zlasti, da so stranke na domačem trgu neprestano plačevale različne cene zaradi ugodnosti sheme DEBP.
The applicant further claimed an adjustment on the export price, based on the benefits received under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme (EPCG) and under ‘Export Credits’ Scheme.
Vložnik je zahteval tudi prilagoditev izvozne cene na podlagi ugodnosti, ki so bile dodeljene v okviru shem „Export Promotion Capital Goods“ (EPCG) in „Export Credits“.
In this regard it has to be noted that, similarly as with the other schemes mentioned above, there is no constraint that the imported goods under the EPCG Scheme should only be used in the production of the exported product concerned.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da kot pri drugih shemah, omenjenih zgoraj, ni omejitev, da se mora uvoženo blago v okviru sheme EPCG uporabljati samo pri proizvodnji izvoznega zadevnega izdelka.
Secondly, the applicant did not submit any evidence of an explicit link between pricing of the exported goods and the benefits received under the EPCG and ‘Export Credits’ Schemes.
Poleg tega vložnik ni predložil nobenih dokazov o izrecni povezavi med oblikovanjem cen izvoženega blaga in ugodnostmi, prejetimi v okviru shem EPCG in „Export Credits“.
Finally, the applicant did not demonstrate that the benefits under these two schemes affected price comparability and, in particular, that the customers consistently paid different prices on the domestic market because of the EPCG and ‘Export Credits’ Schemes benefits.
Prav tako pa družba Ester ni dokazala, da je ugodnost v okviru teh dveh shem vplivala na primerljivost cen in zlasti, da so stranke na domačem trgu neprestano plačevale različne cene zaradi ugodnosti v okviru shem EPCG in „Export Credits“.
Therefore, the claim has to be rejected.
Zato se ta trditev zavrne.
Following the comments on disclosure set out in recitals 44 and 45 below, the dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the cif Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is 8,3 %.
Na podlagi pripomb na razkritje, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 44 in 45 spodaj, je stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije, brez plačane dajatve, 8,3 %.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je preučilo tudi, ali se spremenjene okoliščine lahko razumno štejejo za trajne.
In this regard the investigation showed that Ester indeed has taken a number of measures for cost reduction and efficiency improvements.
V tem pogledu je preiskava pokazala, da je družba Ester sprejela številne ukrepe za zmanjšanje stroškov in izboljšanje učinkovitosti.
Notably, the company modernised and built a new production line.
Predvsem se je družba modernizirala in postavila novo proizvodno linijo.
Further, as a result of significant increase in production, the overhead costs substantially declined.
Poleg tega so se kot posledica velikega povečanja proizvodnje znatno znižali skupni stroški.
The company also started sourcing its raw materials more efficiently (from a closer location) and managed thereby to considerably reduce freight costs.
Družba je začela tudi učinkoviteje izrabljati surovine (iz bližje lokacije) in tako občutno zmanjšala prevozne stroške.
This change in circumstances can therefore be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Ta sprememba okoliščin se zato lahko šteje kot trajna.
As regards export price, the investigation showed a certain stability in Ester’s pricing policies over a long period, between 2006 (the year when the undertaking was repealed) and 2010 (almost the end of the RIP).
V zvezi z izvozno ceno je preiskava pri družbi Ester pokazala določeno stabilnost cenovne politike v daljšem časovnem obdobju, med letoma 2006 (leto, ko je bila zaveza razveljavljena) in 2010 (skoraj konec OPP).
Given that change in the methodology for the determination of Ester’s export price to the Union as described in recitals 24 and 25 above and the above-mentioned stability in prices, the newly calculated dumping margin is likely to be of a lasting nature.
Glede na spremembo v metodologiji za določanje izvozne cene v Unijo za družbo Ester, kot je opisana v uvodnih izjavah 24 in 25 zgoraj, in glede na zgoraj omenjeno stabilnost cen je novoizračunana stopnja dampinga najverjetneje trajne narave.
One exporting producer argued that the average dumping margin of the sample should be recalculated, in case the current interim review resulted in a lower dumping margin for Ester (which was one of the companies in the sample) than previously established.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da je treba ponovno izračunati povprečno stopnjo dampinga vzorca za primer, če bi zaradi sedanjega vmesnega pregleda za družbo Ester (ki je bila ena od družb v vzorcu) veljala nižja stopnja dampinga, kot je bila določena prej.
It should be recalled that the scope of the current partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation is explicitly limited to the review of the margin of dumping of the applicant, an individual exporter, namely Ester.
Treba je opozoriti, da je obseg sedanjega delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe izrecno omejen na pregled stopnje dampinga za vložnika, posameznega izvoznika, torej družbo Ester.
Therefore, the investigation was limited to the specific circumstances of the applicant, taking into account all relevant and duly documented evidence [14].
Zato je bila preiskava omejena na posebne okoliščine vložnika, upoštevajoč vse pomembne in ustrezno dokumentirane dokaze [14].
The conclusions reached on this basis are not pertinent for the other companies in the sample or any other exporting producer in the country concerned.
Sklepi, sprejeti na tej osnovi, ne zadevajo drugih družb v vzorcu ali drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v zadevni državi.
It is considered that the determination of a new sample average margin of dumping pursuant to Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation in such circumstances is neither legally possible nor economically appropriate for the following reasons.
Šteje se, da določitev nove povprečne stopnje dampinga vzorca v skladu s členom 9(6) osnovne uredbe v takih okoliščinah ni niti zakonito mogoča niti ekonomsko primerna iz naslednjih razlogov.
Indeed, it should be recalled that the calculation of a sample average margin of dumping will only resorted to when, in the context of one given investigation, it is considered that the number of exporters is so large that individually investigating all cooperating exporters would unduly burden the Institutions and jeopardise the completion of the investigation within the mandatory deadline laid out in the basic Regulation.
Res je treba opozoriti, da se izračun povprečne stopnje dampinga vzorca uporabi, ko se v kontekstu dane preiskave šteje, da je število izvoznikov tako veliko, da bi individualna preiskava vseh sodelujočih izvoznikov nepotrebno bremenila inštitucije in ogrozila zaključek preiskave v obveznem roku, določenem v osnovni uredbi.
It is then assumed that the computation of a weighted average margin on the basis of the margins of dumping of the sampled exporters is representative of the dumping margin of the non-sampled cooperating exporters.
Zato se domneva, da je izračun tehtane povprečne stopnje na osnovi stopenj dampinga za vzorčene izvoznike reprezentativen za stopnjo dampinga za nevzorčene sodelujoče izvoznike.
This can only be the case if such calculation is made on the basis of margins of dumping relating to the same period of time.
To pa se lahko zgodi le, če je izračun narejen na osnovi stopenj dampinga iz istega časovnega obdobja.
None of the above circumstances are present in the context of a partial interim review limited to one company originally in the sample such as the current investigation.
Nobene od zgoraj naštetih okoliščin niso prisotne v okviru delnega vmesnega pregleda, ki je omejen na eno družbo, prvotno iz vzorca, kot je v sedanji preiskavi.
As a consequence, it is concluded that the factual circumstances of the current partial interim review are such that the disciplines of Article 9(6) clearly do not apply.
Zato se sklene, da so dejanske okoliščine sedanjega vmesnega pregleda take, da se določbe člena 9(6) ne uporabljajo.
It is to be recalled that the statement in the Notice of Initiation according to which ‘if it is determined that measures should be removed or amended for the applicant, it may be necessary to amend the rate of duty currently applicable to imports of the products concerned from other companies in India’ means that, as result of the review, the residual duty may go up in order to avoid circumvention [15].
Opozoriti je treba na trditev iz obvestila o začetku, da „če se ugotovi, da je treba ukrepe za vložnika odpraviti ali spremeniti, bo verjetno treba spremeniti stopnjo dajatve, ki se trenutno uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka od drugih družb v Indiji“, pomeni, da se kot rezultat pregleda preostala dajatev lahko dvigne za preprečitev izogibanja [15].
Since the applicant’s duty is revised downwards, the abovementioned provision of the Notice of Initiation is not relevant.
Ker je dajatev vložnika popravljena navzdol, se zgoraj navedena določba obvestila o začetku ne upošteva.
In light of the reasons described in recitals 37 to 39, the claim that the average dumping margin of the sample should be recalculated has to be rejected.
Iz razlogov, opisanih v uvodnih izjavah od 37 do 39, se zahtevek za ponovni izračun povprečne stopnje dampinga vzorca zavrne.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose to amend the duty rate applicable to the applicant and were given the opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala predlagati sprememba stopnje dajatve, ki se uporablja za vložnika, in so imele možnost, da podajo svoje pripombe.
The applicant reiterated its claims concerning the product classification referred to in recital 29 as well as its claims concerning duty drawback adjustment on the export price due to the DEPB, EPCG and ‘Export Credits’ benefits as described in recitals 30 and 31.
Vložnik je ponovil svojo trditev glede uvrstitve izdelka iz uvodne izjave 29 ter svojo trditev o prilagoditvi za povračilo dajatev na izvozno ceno zaradi ugodnosti v okviru shem DEPB, EPCG in „Export Credits“, kot so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 30 in 31.
However, since no new elements have been provided that could alter the Commission’s findings, the claims had to be rejected.
Ker pa ni predložil nobenih novih dejstev, ki bi lahko spremenili ugotovitve Komisije, je bilo treba trditve zavrniti.
The applicant further contested the method of calculating the cif value of those transactions which have been made on FOB basis.
Vložnik je še naprej spodbijal metodo izračuna vrednosti CIF navedenih transakcij, ki so bile narejene na podlagi cene FOB.
When establishing the unit cif value the Commission related the total freight cost paid by the company to all export transactions including the FOB transactions.
Pri določitvi vrednosti CIF na enoto je Komisija upoštevala skupne prevozne stroške, ki jih je družba plačala vsem izvoznim transakcijam, vključno s transakcijami FOB.
The company claimed that the total freight cost should have been related to the cif transactions only.
Družba je trdila, da bi morali skupni prevozni stroški upoštevati samo transakcije CIF.
This claim has been accepted.
Ta trditev je bila sprejeta.
The applicant finally claimed that not all sample sales have been excluded from the determination of the dumping margin.
Nazadnje je vložnik trdil, da vse vzorčne prodaje niso bile izvzete iz določitve stopnje dampinga.
This claim has also been accepted.
Tudi ta trditev je bila sprejeta.
Following the review investigation, the proposed revised dumping margin and anti-dumping duty rate that would be applicable to imports of the product concerned manufactured by Ester Industries Limited amounts to 8,3 %,
Po preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom predlagana popravljena stopnja dampinga in stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki bi se uporabljala za uvoz zadevnega izdelka družbe Ester Industries Limited, znaša 8,3 % –
The entry concerning Ester Industries Limited, in the table in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007, shall be replaced by the following:
Vnos v zvezi z družbo Ester Industries Limited v preglednici iz člena 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2007 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Ester Industries Limited, DLF City, Phase II, Sector 25, Gurgaon, Haryana — 122022, India
„Ester Industries Limited, DLF City, Phase II, Sector 25, Gurgaon, Haryana - 122022, Indija
OJ L 68, 8.3.2006, p. 37.
UL L 68, 8.3.2006, str. 37.
Notice of expiry (OJ C 68, 3.3.2011, p. 6).
Obvestilo o izteku (UL C 68, 3.3.2011, str. 6).
OJ C 294, 29.10.2010, p. 10.
UL C 294, 29.10.2010, str. 10.
Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2010, EWRIA and Others v Commission, Case T-369/08, points 7 and 79 and the jurisprudence quoted there.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 17. decembra 2010, EWRIA in drugi proti Komisiji, zadeva T-369/08, točka 7 in 79 in sodna praksa, navedena tam.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 270/2010 of 29 March 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 452/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China.
Izvedbena Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 270/2010 z dne 29. marca 2010 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 452/2007 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz likalnih desk s poreklom med drugim iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 84, 31.3.2010, str. 13).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 14/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 14/2012
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain molybdenum wires consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Switzerland
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 511/2010 o uvozu nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz nekaterih žic iz molibdena, dobavljenih iz Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Maleziji ali ne, ter o zaključku preiskave v zvezi z uvozom, dobavljenim iz Švice
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 [2] (‘the original Regulation’), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 64,3 % on imports of certain molybdenum wires as defined in Article 1(1) of the said Regulation (‘the product concerned’) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘country concerned’).
Z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 511/2010 [2] („prvotna uredba“) je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 64,3 % na uvoz nekaterih žic iz molibdena, kakor je določen v členu 1(1) navedene uredbe („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“).
On 4 April 2011, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation to investigate the alleged circumvention of the measures in force.
Komisija je 4. aprila 2011 prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe za preiskavo domnevnega izogibanja veljavnim ukrepom.
The request was submitted by the European Association of Metals (Eurometaux) on behalf of a Union producer of certain molybdenum wires (‘the applicant’).
Zahtevek je vložilo Evropsko združenje za kovine (Eurometaux) v imenu proizvajalca Unije, ki proizvaja nekatere žice iz molibdena („vložnik“).
The request alleged that following the imposition of the measures in force, there had been a significant change in the pattern of trade between PRC, Malaysia and Switzerland on the one hand and the Union on the other.
V zahtevku je bilo navedeno, da se je po uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja med LRK, Malezijo in Švico na eni strani ter Unijo na drugi.
The applicant claimed that this change was due to transhipment of molybdenum wires via Malaysia or Switzerland.
Vložnik je trdil, da je ta sprememba nastala zaradi pretovarjanja žic iz molibdena prek Malezije ali Švice.
The request concluded that there was insufficient due cause or economic justification for the transhipment other than the existence of the measures in force.
Iz zahtevka je razvidno, da ni bil ugotovljen noben drug ustrezen vzrok ali gospodarska utemeljitev za pretovarjanje, razen obstoj veljavnih ukrepov.
Finally, the applicant alleged that the remedial effects of the measures in force were being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices and that the prices of molybdenum wires from Malaysia and Switzerland were dumped when related to the normal value established in the original investigation.
Nazadnje je vložnik navedel, da so bili popravljalni učinki veljavnih ukrepov oslabljeni v smislu količin in cen ter da so bile cene žic iz molibdena iz Malezije in Švice dampinške, če so se nanašale na normalno vrednost, ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi.