natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vehicles type approved before 1 January 2016 and after that date as spare parts for these vehicles
Tipi vozil, odobreni pred 1. januarjem 2016 in pozneje, ter rezervni deli za ta vozila
8(j) Lead in solders for soldering in laminated glazing
8(j) Svinec v spajkah za spajkanje na laminirano steklo
10(a) Electrical and electronic components which contain lead in a glass or ceramic, in a glass or ceramic matrix compound, in a glass-ceramic material, or in a glass-ceramic matrix compound.
10(a) Električni in elektronski sestavni deli, ki vsebujejo svinec v steklu ali keramiki, v stekleni ali keramični matriki, v steklokeramičnem materialu ali v steklokeramični matriki
dielectric ceramic materials of components listed under 10(b), 10(c) and 10(d)
dielektričnih keramičnih materialih sestavnih delov iz točk 10(b), 10(c) in 10(d).
10(b) Lead in PZT based dielectric ceramic materials of capacitors being part of integrated circuits or discrete semiconductors
10(b) Svinec v keramičnih kondenzatorjih, narejenih na osnovi PZT, ki so del integriranih vezij ali diskretnih polprevodnikov
10(c) Lead in dielectric ceramic materials of capacitors with a rated voltage of less than 125 V AC or 250 V DC
10(c) Svinec v keramičnih kondenzatorjih z nazivno napetostjo, manjšo od 125 V pri izmeničnem toku ali 250 V pri enosmernem toku
10(d) Lead in the dielectric ceramic materials of capacitors compensating the temperature-related deviations of sensors in ultrasonic sonar systems
10(d) Svinec v keramičnih kondenzatorjih, ki v senzorjih ultrazvočnih sonarjev odpravljajo napake, ki so posledica spremembe temperature
13(a) Corrosion preventive coatings
13(a) Protikorozijski premazi
13(b) Corrosion preventive coatings related to bolt and nut assemblies for chassis applications
13(b) Protikorozijski premazi za sestave vijakov z maticami za šasije
15(a) Discharge lamps for headlight application
15(a) Sijalke za glavne žaromete
15(b) Fluorescent tubes used in instrument panel displays
15(b) Fluorescentne cevi v prikazovalnikih instrumentnih plošč
For the application of this clause electronic devices not installed by the manufacturer on the production line shall not be taken into account.
Elektronske naprave, ki jih ni namestil proizvajalec na proizvodni liniji, se za uporabo te klavzule ne upoštevajo.
Dismantling if, in correlation with entries 8(a) to 8(j), an average threshold of 60 grams per vehicle is exceeded.
Razstavljanje, če se v povezavi z navedbami 8(a) do 8(j) prekorači povprečna mejna vrednost 60 gramov na vozilo.
Directive 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2013/30/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on safety of offshore oil and gas operations and amending Directive 2004/35/EC
o varnosti naftnih in plinskih dejavnosti na morju in spremembi Direktive 2004/35/ES
Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union establishes the objectives of preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment and the prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources.
V členu 191 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije so določeni cilji o ohranjanju, varstvu in izboljšanju kakovosti okolja ter skrbni in preudarni rabi naravnih virov.
It creates an obligation for all Union action to be supported by a high level of protection based on the precautionary principle, and on the principles that preventive action needs to be taken, that environmental damage needs as a matter of priority to be rectified at source and that the polluter must pay.
S tem je uvedena obveznost, da je treba pri vseh ukrepih Unije zagotoviti visoko raven varstva, ki temelji na previdnostnem načelu in na načelih, da je treba delovati preventivno, da je treba okoljsko škodo prednostno odpravljati pri viru, ter da mora stroške plačati povzročitelj obremenitve.
The objective of this Directive is to reduce as far as possible the occurrence of major accidents relating to offshore oil and gas operations and to limit their consequences, thus increasing the protection of the marine environment and coastal economies against pollution, establishing minimum conditions for safe offshore exploration and exploitation of oil and gas and limiting possible disruptions to Union indigenous energy production, and to improve the response mechanisms in case of an accident.
Cilj te direktive je čim bolj zmanjšati pogostost večjih nesreč, povezanih z naftnimi in plinskimi dejavnostmi na morju, in omejiti njihove posledice ter s tem izboljšati zaščito morskega okolja in obalnih gospodarstev pred onesnaženjem, določiti minimalne pogoje za varno raziskovanje in izkoriščanje nafte ter zemeljskega plina na morju, omejiti morebitne prekinitve domače proizvodnje energije v Uniji ter izboljšati mehanizme za ukrepanje ob nesrečah.
This Directive should apply not only to future offshore oil and gas installations and operations but, subject to transitional arrangements, also to existing installations.
Ta direktiva bi se morala uporabljati ne samo za bodoče naftne in plinske naprave ter dejavnosti na morju, temveč, pod pogoji prehodne ureditve, tudi za obstoječe naprave.
Major accidents relating to offshore oil and gas operations are likely to have devastating and irreversible consequences on the marine and coastal environment as well as significant negative impacts on coastal economies.
Zelo verjetno je, da bodo imele večje nesreče, povezane z naftnimi in plinskimi dejavnostmi na morju, uničujoče in trajne posledice za morsko in obalno okolje, pa tudi precejšne negativne učinke na obalna gospodarstva.
Accidents relating to offshore oil and gas operations, in particular the accident in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, have raised public awareness of the risks involved in offshore oil and gas operations and have prompted a review of policies aimed at ensuring the safety of such operations.
Nesreče, povezane z naftnimi in plinskimi dejavnostmi na morju, zlasti nesreča v Mehiškem zalivu leta 2010, so povečale ozaveščenost javnosti o tveganjih, povezanih z naftnimi in plinskimi dejavnostmi na morju, in spodbudile pregled politik za zagotavljanje varnosti takih dejavnosti.
The risks relating to major offshore oil or gas accidents are significant.
Tveganja, povezana z večjimi naftnimi in plinskimi nesrečami na morju, so precejšnja.
By reducing the risk of pollution of offshore waters, this Directive should therefore contribute to ensuring the protection of the marine environment and in particular to achieving or maintaining good environmental status by 2020 at the latest, an objective set out in Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) [3].
Z zmanjšanjem tveganja onesnaženja morskih voda bi morala ta direktiva torej prispevati k zagotavljanju varstva morskega okolja, zlasti k temu, da se najpozneje do leta 2020 doseže ali ohrani dobro okoljsko stanje, kar je določeno kot cilj v Direktivi 2008/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji) [3].
Directive 2008/56/EC aims to address, as one of its central purposes, the cumulative impacts from all activities on the marine environment, and is the environmental pillar of the Integrated Maritime Policy.
Direktiva 2008/56/ES, katere eden glavnih ciljev je obravnava skupnega vpliva vseh dejavnosti na morsko okolje, je okoljski steber integrirane pomorske politike.
That policy is relevant to offshore oil and gas operations as it requires the linking of particular concerns from each economic sector with the general aim of ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the oceans, seas and coastal areas, with the objective of developing a coherent approach to the seas taking into account all economic, environmental and social aspects through the use of maritime spatial planning and marine knowledge.
Ta politika je pomembna za naftne in plinske dejavnosti na morju, saj določa, da je treba interese posameznih gospodarskih sektorjev uskladiti s splošnim ciljem zagotavljanja celovitega razumevanja oceanov, morij in obalnih območij, da bi oblikovali usklajen pristop k obravnavi morij, v katerem bodo s pomočjo pomorskega prostorskega načrtovanja in znanja o morju upoštevani vsi gospodarski, okoljski in socialni vidiki.
Offshore oil and gas industries are established in a number of regions of the Union, and there are prospects for new regional developments in offshore waters of Member States, with technological developments allowing for drilling in more challenging environments.
Podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo s pridobivanjem nafte in plina na morju, so v številnih regijah Unije, v morskih vodah držav članic pa obstajajo možnosti za nadaljnji regionalni razvoj, saj tehnološki napredek omogoča vrtanje v vse zahtevnejših okoljih.
Production of offshore oil and gas is a significant element in security of the Union’s energy supply.
Proizvodnja nafte in zemeljskega plina na morju je pomemben del zanesljive oskrbe Unije z energijo.
The existing divergent and fragmented regulatory framework applying to safety of offshore oil and gas operations in the Union and current industry safety practices do not provide a fully adequate assurance that the risk of offshore accidents is minimised throughout the Union, and that in the event of an accident occurring in offshore waters of Member States, the most effective response would be deployed in a timely manner.
V veljavnem neenotnem in razdrobljenem regulativnem okviru, ki ureja varnost naftnih in plinskih dejavnosti na morju v Uniji, in praksi industrije glede zagotavljanja varnosti ni popolnoma ustreznega zagotovila, da so tveganja zaradi nesreč na morju po vsej Uniji minimalna in da bo v primeru nesreče v morskih vodah držav članic pravočasno uporabljen najučinkovitejši ukrep.
Under existing liability regimes, the party responsible may not always be clearly identifiable and may not be able, or liable, to pay all the costs to remedy the damage it has caused.
Z veljavnimi ureditvami glede odgovornosti ni vedno mogoče jasno določiti, kdo je odgovoren, ali pa tisti, ki je odgovoren, morda ni sposoben oziroma ni zavezan plačati vseh stroškov sanacije škode, ki jo je povzročil.
The party responsible should always be clearly identifiable before offshore oil and gas operations are commenced.
Vedno bi moralo biti še pred začetkom naftnih in plinskih dejavnosti na morju jasno, kdo so odgovorne osebe.
Pursuant to Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons [4] offshore oil and gas operations in the Union may be carried out subject to obtaining an authorisation.
V skladu z Direktivo 94/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 1994 o pogojih za izdajo in uporabo dovoljenj za iskanje, raziskovanje in izkoriščanje ogljikovodikov [4] se lahko naftne in plinske dejavnosti na morju v Uniji opravljajo po pridobitvi dovoljenja.
In this context the licensing authority is required to consider the technical and financial risks, and where appropriate, the previous record of responsibility, of applicants seeking exclusive exploration and production licences.
Pri tem mora organ, pristojen za izdajo dovoljenj, upoštevati tehnična in finančna tveganja ter morebitno predhodno odgovornost prosilcev, ki zaprosijo za izdajo izključnih dovoljenj za raziskovanje in proizvodnjo.
There is the need to ensure that when examining the technical and financial capability of the licensee the licensing authority thoroughly examine also its capability for ensuring continued safe and effective operations under all foreseeable conditions.
Zagotoviti je treba, da organ, pristojen za izdajo dovoljenj, pri preverjanju tehnične in finančne sposobnosti imetnika dovoljenja temeljito preveri tudi, ali je ta sposoben zagotavljati stalno varnost in učinkovitost dejavnosti v vseh predvidljivih okoliščinah.
When assessing the financial capability of entities applying for authorisation pursuant to Directive 94/22/EC, Member States should verify that such entities have provided appropriate evidence that adequate provisions have been or are to be made to cover liabilities deriving from major accidents.
Države članice bi morale pri oceni finančne sposobnosti subjektov, ki zaprosijo za dovoljenje, v skladu z Direktivo 94/22/ES preveriti, ali so taki subjekti predložili ustrezne dokaze, da so bili ali bodo sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za kritje odgovornosti v primeru večjih nesreč.
There is a need to clarify that holders of authorisations for offshore oil and gas operations pursuant to Directive 94/22/EC are also the liable ‘operators’ within the meaning of Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage [5], and should not delegate their responsibilities in this regard to third parties contracted by them.
Pojasniti je treba, da so imetniki dovoljenj za opravljanje naftnih in plinskih dejavnosti na morju v skladu z Direktivo 94/22/ES tudi potencialni odgovorni „izvajalci“ v skladu z Direktivo 2004/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode [5] in zato svoje odgovornosti ne bi smeli prenašati na tretje osebe, s katerimi sklenejo pogodbo.
While general authorisations pursuant to Directive 94/22/EC guarantee to the licensees exclusive rights for exploring for or producing oil or gas within a given licensed area, offshore oil and gas operations within that area should be subject to continuous expert regulatory oversight by Member States in order to ensure there are effective controls in place for preventing major accidents, and limiting their impacts to persons, the environment, and security of energy supply.
Čeprav splošna dovoljenja v skladu z Direktivo 94/22/ES imetnikom dovoljenja zagotavljajo izključne pravice do raziskovanja ali proizvodnje nafte ali zemeljskega plina na določenem območju, za katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje, bi morale države članice izvajati stalni strokovni regulativni nadzor nad naftnimi in plinskimi dejavnostmi na morju na tem območju, s čimer zagotovijo, da obstaja učinkovita kontrola za preprečevanje večjih nesreč in omejitev njihovega vpliva na ljudi, okolje in zanesljivo oskrbo z energijo.
Offshore oil and gas operations should be conducted only by operators appointed by licensees or licensing authorities.
Naftne in plinske dejavnosti na morju bi morali opravljati samo izvajalci, ki jih imenujejo imetniki dovoljenj ali organi, pristojni za izdajo dovoljenj.
The operator can be a third party or the licensee or one of the licensees depending on commercial arrangements or national administrative requirements.
Izvajalec je lahko tretja oseba ali imetnik dovoljenja ali eden od imetnikov dovoljenja, odvisno od komercialne ureditve ali nacionalnih upravnih zahtev.
The operator should always be the entity with the primary responsibility for safety of operations and should be at all times competent to act in that regard.
Izvajalec bi moral biti vedno subjekt z glavno odgovornostjo za varnost dejavnosti in bi moral biti ves čas sposoben ukrepati.
That role differs depending on the particular stage of activities covered by the licence.
Ta vloga se razlikuje glede na fazo, v kateri so dejavnosti, zajete v dovoljenju.
The operator’s role is therefore to operate a well at the exploration stage and to operate a production installation at the production stage.
Vloga izvajalca je torej izvajanje del na vrtini v fazi raziskovanja in izvajanje del na proizvodni napravi v fazi proizvodnje.
It should be possible for the operator of a well at the exploration stage and the operator of a production installation to be the same entity for a given licensed area.
Moralo bi biti mogoče, da sta izvajalec del na vrtini v fazi raziskovanja in izvajalec na proizvodni napravi na nekem območju, za katero je bilo izdano dovoljenje, en subjekt.
Operators should reduce the risk of a major accident as low as reasonably practicable, to the point where the cost of further risk reduction would be grossly disproportionate to the benefits of such reduction.
Izvajalci bi morali tveganje večje nesreče zmanjšati na najnižjo raven, ki je izvedljiva v praksi, tj. na raven, pri kateri bi bili stroški nadaljnjega zmanjšanja tveganja preveč nesorazmerni s prednostmi takega zmanjšanja.
The reasonable practicability of risk reduction measures should be kept under review in the light of new knowledge and technology developments.
Praktično izvedljivost ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja bi bilo treba redno preverjati na podlagi novih spoznanj in tehnološkega razvoja.
In assessing whether the time, cost and effort would be grossly disproportionate to the benefits of further reducing the risk, regard should be had to best practice risk levels compatible with the operations being conducted.
Pri ocenjevanju, ali bi bili čas, stroški in trud preveč nesorazmerni s prednostmi nadaljnjega zmanjševanja tveganja, bi bilo treba upoštevati ravni tveganja iz najboljše prakse, ki ustrezajo izvajani dejavnosti.
It is important to ensure that the public is given early and effective opportunity to participate in the decision-making relating to operations that can potentially have significant effects on the environment in the Union.
Pomembno je, da se javnosti omogoči zgodnja in učinkovita udeležba pri odločanju, povezanem z dejavnostmi, ki bi lahko pomembno vplivale na okolje v Uniji.
This policy is in line with the Union’s international commitments, such as the UN/ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters [6] (the Aarhus Convention).
Ta politika je skladna z mednarodnimi obveznostmi Unije, kot je Konvencija ZN/ECE o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah [6] (Aarhuška konvencija).
Article 6 of the Aarhus Convention provides for public participation in decisions on the specific activities listed in Annex I thereto and on activities not listed there which may have a significant effect on the environment.
Člen 6 Aarhuške konvencije določa udeležbo javnosti pri odločanju o posebnih dejavnostih, naštetih v Prilogi I k Aarhuški konvenciji, in dejavnostih, ki v tej prilogi niso naštete, vendar bi lahko pomembno vplivale na okolje.
Article 7 of the Aarhus Convention requires public participation concerning plans and programmes relating to the environment.
Člen 7 Aarhuške konvencije določa udeležbo javnosti pri načrtih in programih v zvezi z okoljem.
Relevant requirements exist in Union legal acts in relation to the development of plans and projects, in particular in Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment [7], Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment [8], Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment [9] and Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances [10].
Pravni akti Unije določajo ustrezne zahteve glede priprave načrtov in projektov, zlasti v Direktivi 2001/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. junija 2001 o presoji vplivov nekaterih načrtov in programov na okolje [7], Direktivi 2003/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. maja 2003 o sodelovanju javnosti pri sestavi nekaterih načrtov in programov v zvezi z okoljem [8], Direktivi 2011/92/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje [9] in Direktivi 2012/18/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. julija 2012 o obvladovanju nevarnosti večjih nesreč, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi [10].
However, not all exploratory offshore oil and gas operations are covered by existing Union requirements on public participation.
Vendar veljavne zahteve Unije glede udeležbe javnosti ne veljajo za vse raziskovalne naftne in plinske dejavnosti na morju.
This applies in particular to the decision-making that aims or could lead to exploration operations being commenced from a non-production installation.
To velja zlasti za odločanje, katerega cilj je začetek raziskovalnih dejavnosti z neproizvodne naprave ali pa bi bila to lahko njegova posledica.
However, such exploration operations may in some circumstances potentially have significant effects on the environment and the decision-making should therefore be the subject of public participation as required under the Aarhus Convention.
Toda takšne raziskovalne dejavnosti bi lahko v nekaterih okoliščinah pomembno vplivale na okolje in odločanje, zato bi morala biti zanje obvezna udeležba javnosti, kot to določa Aarhuška konvencija.
Within the Union, there are already examples of good standards in national regulatory practices relating to offshore oil and gas operations.
V Uniji že obstajajo primeri dobrih nacionalnih regulativnih praks v zvezi z naftnimi in plinskimi dejavnostmi na morju.
However, these are inconsistently applied throughout the Union and no Member State has yet incorporated all of the best regulatory practices in its legislation for preventing major accidents or limiting the consequences for human life and health, and for the environment.
Vendar se te po Uniji ne uporabljajo dosledno, nobena od držav članic pa v svojo zakonodajo tudi še ni vključila vseh najboljših regulativnih praks, katerih namen je preprečevanje večjih nesreč ali omejevanje njihovih posledic za življenje in zdravje ljudi ter za okolje.
Best regulatory practices are necessary to deliver effective regulation which secures the highest safety standards and protects the environment, and can be achieved, inter alia, by integrating related functions into a competent authority that may draw resources from one or more national bodies.
Najboljše regulativne prakse so nujne za učinkovito zakonsko ureditev, ki zagotavlja najvišje standarde glede varnosti in varuje okolje in ki jo je med drugim mogoče zagotoviti z dodelitvijo sorodnih nalog pristojnemu organu, ki lahko uporablja vire enega ali več nacionalnih organov.
In accordance with Council Directive 92/91/EEC of 3 November 1992 concerning the minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers in the mineral-extracting industries through drilling (eleventh individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) [11], workers and/or their representatives should be consulted on matters relating to safety and health at work and be allowed to take part in discussions on all questions relating to safety and health at work.
Direktiva Sveta 92/91/EGS z dne 3. novembra 1992 o minimalnih zahtevah za izboljšanje varnosti in zdravja pri delu za delavce v dejavnostih pridobivanja rudnin z vrtanjem (enajsta posebna direktiva v smislu člena 16(1) Direktive 89/391/EGS) [11] določa, da se je treba o zadevah v zvezi z varnostjo in zdravjem pri delu posvetovati z delavci in/ali njihovimi zastopniki ter jim omogočiti, da se udeležijo razprav o vseh vprašanjih v zvezi z varnostjo in zdravjem pri delu.
In addition, best practice in the Union is for consultation mechanisms to be formally established by Member States on a tripartite basis comprising the competent authority, operators and owners, and worker representatives.
Poleg tega morajo države članice v skladu z najboljšo prakso v Uniji formalno vzpostaviti tristranske posvetovalne mehanizme, ki vključujejo pristojni organ, izvajalce na neproizvodnih napravah in lastnike takšnih naprav ter predstavnike delavcev.