natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where an institution fails to meet the combined buffer requirement and intends to distribute any of its distributable profits or undertake an action referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of the second subparagraph of paragraph 2, it shall notify the competent authority and provide the following information:
Če institucija ne izpolni zahteve po skupnem blažilniku in namerava izplačati razpoložljiv dobiček ali sprejeti dejanje iz točk (a), (b) in (c) drugega pododstavka odstavka 2, uradno obvesti pristojni organ in predloži naslednje podatke:
the amount of capital maintained by the institution, subdivided as follows:
znesek kapitala, ki ga zagotavlja institucija, dodatno razdeljenega na:
Common Equity Tier 1 capital,
navadni lastniški temeljni kapital,
Additional Tier 1 capital,
dodatni temeljni kapital,
Member States may impose a shorter transitional period than that specified in paragraphs 1 to 4 and thereby implement the capital conservation buffer and the countercyclical capital buffer from 31 December 2013.
Države članice lahko uvedejo krajše prehodno obdobje, kot je obdobje iz odstavkov 1 do 4, in tako uporabljajo varovalni kapitalski blažilnik in proticiklični kapitalski blažilnik od 31. decembra 2013.
That report shall identify any areas which require further development as regards cooperation and information sharing.
V poročilu se opredelijo področja, ki zahtevajo nadaljnji razvoj glede sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij.
EBA shall publish the report on its website.
EBA to poročilo objavi na svoji spletni strani
By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, Article 131 shall apply from 1 January 2016.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 tega člena se člen 131 uporablja od 1. januarja 2016.
Annex V, point 2
Priloga V, točka 2
Article 76(2)
člen 76(2)
in Slovenia, the 'SID-Slovenska izvozna in razvojna banka, d.d.
"SID – Slovenska izvozna in razvojna banka, d.d.
Ljubljana';
Ljubljana" v Sloveniji,
Corrigendum to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC
Popravek Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o dostopu do dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in bonitetnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij, spremembi Direktive 2002/87/ES in razveljavitvi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES
(Official Journal of the European Union L 176 of 27 June 2013)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 176 z dne 27. junija 2013)
On page 423, the second subparagraph of Article 162(1):
Stran 423, drugi pododstavek člena 162(1):
‘Member States shall apply those provisions from 31 December 2013.’,
„Države članice te predpise uporabljajo od 31. decembra 2013.“
‘Member States shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2014.’;
„Države članice te predpise uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2014.“
on page 423, Article 162(3):
Stran 423, člen 162(3):
‘…for services provided or performance from the year 2014 onwards, whether due on the basis of contracts concluded before or after 31 December 2013.’,
„… storitve ali poslovne rezultate od leta 2014 dalje, in sicer zapadle na podlagi pogodb, sklenjenih pred … ali po tem datumu 31. decembra 2013.“
‘…for services provided or performance from the year 2014 onwards, whether due on the basis of contracts concluded before or after 1 January 2014.’;
„…storitve ali poslovne rezultate od leta 2014 dalje, in sicer zapadle na podlagi pogodb, sklenjenih pred 1. januarjem 2014 ali po tem datumu.“
on page 424, Article 162(6):
Stran 424, člen 162(6):
‘By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, Article 133 shall apply from 31 December 2013.’,
„Z odstopanjem od odstavka 2 tega člena se člen 133 uporablja od 31. decembra 2013.“
‘By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, Article 133 shall apply from 1 January 2014.’.
„Z odstopanjem od odstavka 2 tega člena se člen 133 uporablja od 1. januarja 2014.“
Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2013/37/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information
o spremembi Direktive 2003/98/ES o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja
Documents produced by public sector bodies of the Member States constitute a vast, diverse and valuable pool of resources that can benefit the knowledge economy.
Dokumenti, ki jih ustvarijo organi javnega sektorja držav članic, so obsežna, raznolika in obsežna zbirka virov, ki lahko koristi gospodarstvu znanja.
Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information [3] establishes a minimum set of rules governing the re-use and the practical means of facilitating re-use of existing documents held by public sector bodies of the Member States.
Direktiva 2003/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja [3] določa minimalni nabor pravil, ki urejajo ponovno uporabo, in praktična sredstva za olajševanje ponovne uporabe obstoječih dokumentov, ki jih hranijo organi javnega sektorja držav članic.
Open data policies which encourage the wide availability and re-use of public sector information for private or commercial purposes, with minimal or no legal, technical or financial constraints, and which promote the circulation of information not only for economic operators but also for the public, can play an important role in kick-starting the development of new services based on novel ways to combine and make use of such information, stimulate economic growth and promote social engagement.
Politike odprtih podatkov, ki spodbujajo široko razpoložljivost in ponovno uporabo informacij javnega sektorja za zasebne ali komercialne namene z minimalnimi pravnimi, tehničnimi ali finančnimi omejitvami ali brez njih in ki pospešujejo kroženje informacij ne le za gospodarske subjekte, temveč tudi za javnost, imajo lahko pomembno vlogo pri razvoju novih storitev, ki temeljijo na novih načinih združevanja in uporabe takih informacij, spodbujajo gospodarsko rast in družbeno angažiranost.
However, this requires a level playing field at Union level in terms of whether or not the re-use of documents is authorised, which cannot be achieved by leaving it subject to the different rules and practices of the Member States or the public sector bodies concerned.
Vendar so za to potrebni enaki konkurenčni pogoji na ravni Unije v zvezi s tem, ali je ponovna uporaba dokumentov dovoljena ali ne, česar ni mogoče doseči, če ponovno uporabo urejajo različna pravila in prakse zadevnih držav članic ali organov javnega sektorja.
Allowing re-use of documents held by a public sector body adds value for the re-users, for the end users and for society in general and in many cases for the public body itself, by promoting transparency and accountability and providing feedback from re-users and end users which allows the public sector body concerned to improve the quality of the information collected.
Omogočanje ponovne uporabe dokumentov, ki jih hrani organ javnega sektorja, predstavlja dodano vrednost za ponovne uporabnike, končne uporabnike in družbo na splošno ter v številnih primerih tudi za javni organ, saj povečanje preglednosti in odgovornosti ter povratne informacije ponovnih uporabnikov in končnih uporabnikov zadevnemu organu javnega sektorja omogočajo, da izboljša kakovost zbranih informacij.
Since the first set of rules on re-use of public sector information was adopted in 2003, the amount of data in the world, including public data, has increased exponentially and new types of data are being generated and collected.
Od sprejetja prvega nabora pravil o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja leta 2003 se je količina podatkov na svetu, vključno z javnimi podatki, eksponentno povečala, pri čemer nastajajo in se zbirajo nove vrste podatkov.
In parallel, we are witnessing a continuous evolution in technologies for analysis, exploitation and processing of data.
Hkrati se nenehno razvijajo tehnologije za analiziranje, izkoriščanje in obdelavo podatkov.
This rapid technological evolution makes it possible to create new services and new applications, which are built upon the use, aggregation or combination of data.
Ta hitri tehnološki razvoj omogoča oblikovanje novih storitev in novih aplikacij, ki temeljijo na uporabi, združevanju ali kombiniranju podatkov.
The rules adopted in 2003 no longer keep pace with these rapid changes and as a result the economic and social opportunities offered by re-use of public data risk being missed.
Ker pravila, sprejeta leta 2003, tem hitrim spremembam ne ustrezajo več, obstaja nevarnost, da gospodarske in socialne priložnosti, ki jih omogoča uporaba javnih podatkov, ne bodo izkoriščene.
At the same time, Member States have now established re-use policies under Directive 2003/98/EC and some of them have been adopting ambitious open data approaches to make re-use of accessible public data easier for citizens and companies beyond the minimum level set by that Directive.
Hkrati so države članice v skladu z Direktivo 2003/98/ES oblikovale politike ponovne uporabe, pri čemer so nekatere sprejele ambiciozne pristope v zvezi z odprtimi podatki, da bi državljanom in podjetjem olajšale ponovno uporabo razpoložljivih javnih podatkov v obsegu, ki presega minimalno raven iz direktive.
To prevent different rules in different Member States acting as a barrier to the cross-border offer of products and services, and to enable comparable public data sets to be re-usable for pan-European applications based on them, a minimum harmonisation is required to determine what public data are available for re-use in the internal information market, consistent with the relevant access regime.
Za preprečitev tega, da bi različna pravila v različnih državah članicah ovirala čezmejno ponudbo izdelkov in storitev, ter da se omogoči ponovna uporaba primerljivih sklopov javnih podatkov za vseevropske aplikacije, ki temeljijo na njih, je potrebna minimalna uskladitev v zvezi s tem, kateri javni podatki so na voljo za ponovno uporabo na notranjem informacijskem trgu, v skladu z zadevnim režimom dostopa.
Directive 2003/98/EC does not contain an obligation concerning access to documents or an obligation to allow re-use of documents.
Direktiva 2003/98/ES ne vključuje obveznosti glede dostopa do dokumentov ali obveznosti odobritve ponovne uporabe dokumentov.
The decision whether or not to authorise re-use remains with the Member States or the public sector body concerned.
Odločitev, ali se ponovna uporaba odobri ali ne, je prepuščena državam članicam ali zadevnemu organu javnega sektorja.
At the same time, Directive 2003/98/EC builds on national rules on access to documents and allowing re-use of documents is therefore not required under that Directive where access is restricted (for example, national rules restrict access to citizens or companies who prove a particular interest in obtaining access to documents) or excluded (for example, national rules exclude access because of the sensitive nature of the documents based, inter alia, on grounds of national security, defence, public security).
Direktiva 2003/98/ES hkrati temelji na nacionalnih pravilih o dostopu do dokumentov in zato ne zahteva odobritve ponovne uporabe dokumentov, kadar je dostop omejen (ko na primer nacionalna pravila dovoljujejo dostop le državljanom ali družbam, ki dokažejo poseben interes za pridobitev dostopa do dokumentov) ali izključen (ko na primer nacionalna pravila izključujejo dostop zaradi občutljive narave dokumentov, recimo iz razlogov nacionalne varnosti, obrambe in javne varnosti).
Some Member States have expressly linked the right of re-use to a right of access, so that all generally accessible documents are re-usable.
Nekatere države članice so pravico do ponovne uporabe izrecno povezale s pravico do dostopa, tako da se lahko ponovno uporabijo vsi splošno dostopni dokumenti.
In other Member States, the link between the two sets of rules is less clear, and this is a source of legal uncertainty.
V drugih državah članicah je povezava med tema sklopoma pravil manj jasna in to povzroča pravno negotovost.
Directive 2003/98/EC should therefore be amended to lay down a clear obligation for Member States to make all documents re-usable unless access is restricted or excluded under national rules on access to documents and subject to the other exceptions laid down in this Directive.
Zato bi bilo treba Direktivo 2003/98/ES spremeniti tako, da bi določala jasno obveznost držav članic, da dajo vse dokumente na voljo za ponovno uporabo, razen če je dostop omejen ali izključen v skladu z nacionalnimi pravili o dostopu do dokumentov in če zanj veljajo druge izjeme, navedene v tej direktivi.
The amendments made by this Directive do not seek to define or to change access regimes in Member States, which remain their responsibility.
Spremembe, uvedene s to direktivo, ne poskušajo določiti ali spremeniti ureditve dostopa v državah članicah, ki ostajajo zanje pristojne še naprej.
Taking into account Union law and the international obligations of Member States and of the Union, particularly under the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, documents for which third parties hold intellectual property rights should be excluded from the scope of Directive 2003/98/EC.
Ob upoštevanju prava Unije in mednarodnih obveznosti držav članic ter Unije, zlasti v skladu z Bernsko konvencijo za varstvo književnih in umetniških del ter Sporazumom o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine, bi morali biti dokumenti, na katerih imajo tretje osebe pravice intelektualne lastnine, izključeni iz področja uporabe Direktive 2003/98/ES.
If a third party was the initial owner of the intellectual property rights for a document held by libraries, including university libraries, museums and archives and the term of protection of those rights has not expired, that document should, for the purpose of this Directive, be considered as a document for which third parties hold intellectual property rights.
Če je bila tretja oseba prvotni nosilec pravic intelektualne lastnine na dokumentu, ki ga hranijo knjižnice, vključno z univerzitetnimi knjižnicami, muzeji ali arhivi, in obdobje zaščite teh pravic še ni poteklo, bi se moral navedeni dokument za namene te direktive šteti za dokument, na katerem imajo tretje osebe pravice intelektualne lastnine.
Directive 2003/98/EC should apply to documents the supply of which forms part of the public tasks of the public sector bodies concerned, as defined by law or by other binding rules in the Member States.
Direktiva 2003/98/ES bi se morala uporabljati za dokumente, ki jih zadevni organi javnega sektorja zagotavljajo kot del svojih javnih nalog, kakor so opredeljene z zakonodajo ali drugimi obvezujočimi predpisi v državah članicah.
In the absence of such rules the public tasks should be defined in accordance with common administrative practice in the Member States, provided that the scope of the public tasks is transparent and subject to review.
Če takih predpisov ni, bi bilo treba te javne naloge opredeliti v skladu z običajno upravno prakso v državah članicah, pod pogojem, da je obseg teh javnih nalog pregleden in predmet pregledov.
The public tasks could be defined generally or on a case-by-case basis for individual public sector bodies.
Javne naloge se lahko opredeli na splošno ali za vsak primer posebej za posamezne organe javnega sektorja.
This Directive should be implemented and applied in full compliance with the principles relating to the protection of personal data in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [4].
Direktivo bi bilo treba uporabljati in izvajati ob polnem spoštovanju načel, povezanih z varstvom osebnih podatkov v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [4].
In particular, it is worth noting that, according to that Directive, the Member States should determine the conditions under which the processing of personal data is lawful.
Zlasti je vredno omeniti, da bi morale v skladu z navedeno direktivo države članice določiti pogoje, pod katerimi je obdelava osebnih podatkov zakonita.
Furthermore, one of the principles of that Directive is that personal data must not be processed further to collection in a way incompatible with the specified, explicit and legitimate purposes for which those data were collected.
Eno od načel navedene direktive je tudi to, da se osebnih podatkov ne sme naprej obdelovati na način, ki bi bil nezdružljiv z določenimi, izrecnimi in zakonitimi nameni, za katere so bili ti podatki zbrani.
Directive 2003/98/EC should be without prejudice to the rights, including economic and moral rights that employees of public sector bodies may enjoy under national rules.
Direktiva 2003/98/ES ne bi smela posegati v pravice, vključno z ekonomskimi in moralnimi pravicami, ki jih lahko imajo zaposleni v organih javnega sektorja v skladu z nacionalnimi predpisi.
Moreover, where any document is made available for re-use, the public sector body concerned should retain the right to exploit the document.
Poleg tega bi moral zadevni organ javnega sektorja ohraniti pravico do uporabe vsakega dokumenta, ki ga da na voljo za ponovno uporabo.
The scope of Directive 2003/98/EC should be extended to libraries, including university libraries, museums and archives.
Področje uporabe Direktive 2003/98/ES bi bilo treba razširiti na knjižnice, vključno z univerzitetnimi knjižnicami, muzeje in arhive.
One of the principal aims of the establishment of the internal market is the creation of conditions conducive to the development of Union-wide services.
Eden glavnih ciljev vzpostavitve notranjega trga je ustvarjanje razmer, ki omogočajo razvoj storitev na ravni Unije.
Libraries, museums and archives hold a significant amount of valuable public sector information resources, in particular since digitisation projects have multiplied the amount of digital public domain material.
Knjižnice, muzeji in arhivi hranijo znatno količino dragocenih virov informacij javnega sektorja, zlasti odkar se je s projekti digitalizacije pomnožila količina digitalnih gradiv v javni uporabi.
These cultural heritage collections and related metadata are a potential base for digital content products and services and have a huge potential for innovative re-use in sectors such as learning and tourism.
Te zbirke kulturne dediščine in z njimi povezani metapodatki so potencialna osnova za izdelke in storitve z digitalno vsebino in nudijo veliko možnosti za inovativno ponovno uporabo v sektorjih, kot sta učenje in turizem.
Wider possibilities for re-using public cultural material should, inter alia, allow Union companies to exploit its potential and contribute to economic growth and job creation.
Širše možnosti ponovne uporabe javnega kulturnega gradiva bi gospodarskim družbam Unije med drugim omogočile, da izkoristijo njegov potencial in prispevajo h gospodarski rasti in ustvarjanju delovnih mest.
There are considerable differences in the rules and practices in the Member States relating to the exploitation of public cultural resources, which constitute barriers to realising economic potential of those resources.
Med pravili in praksami v državah članicah, ki se nanašajo na izkoriščanje javnih kulturnih virov, obstajajo znatne razlike, ki pomenijo ovire pri uresničevanju gospodarskega potenciala teh virov.
As libraries, museums and archives continue to invest in digitisation, many already make their public domain content available for re-use and many are actively seeking out opportunities to re-use their content.
Medtem ko knjižnice, muzeji in arhivi še naprej vlagajo v digitalizacijo, mnogi med njimi že dajejo svoje javno dostopne vsebine na voljo za ponovno uporabo in mnogi aktivno iščejo možnosti za ponovno uporabo svojih vsebin.
However, as they operate in very different regulatory and cultural environments, the practices of cultural establishments in exploiting content have developed in disparate ways.
Ker pa delujejo v zelo različnih regulativnih in kulturnih okoljih, so se prakse kulturnih ustanov pri izkoriščanju vsebin razvijale zelo različno.
Since the differences in national rules and practices or the absence of clarity hinder the smooth functioning of the internal market and the proper development of the information society in the Union, minimum harmonisation of national rules and practices on the re-use of public cultural material in libraries, museums and archives should be undertaken.
Ker razlike v nacionalnih pravilih in praksah ali pomanjkanje jasnosti ovirajo nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga in pravilen razvoj informacijske družbe v Uniji, bi se bilo treba zavezati za vsaj minimalno uskladitev nacionalnih pravil in praks glede ponovne uporabe javnega kulturnega gradiva v knjižnicah, muzejih in arhivih.
The extension of the scope of Directive 2003/98/EC should be limited to three types of cultural establishments – libraries, including university libraries, museums and archives, because their collections are and will increasingly become a valuable material for re-use in many products such as mobile applications.
Razširitev področja uporabe Direktive 2003/98/ES bi se morala omejiti na tri vrste kulturnih ustanov – knjižnice, vključno z univerzitetnimi knjižnicami, muzeje in arhive, katerih zbirke so in bodo v prihodnje še bolj dragoceno gradivo za ponovno uporabo v številnih izdelkih, na primer v mobilnih aplikacijah.
Other types of cultural establishments (such as orchestras, operas, ballets and theatres), including the archives that are part of those establishments, should remain outside the scope because of their ‘performing arts’ specificity.
Druge vrste kulturnih ustanov (na primer orkestri, opere, baleti in gledališča), vključno z arhivi, ki so njihov del, bi morale zaradi svojega posebnega značaja „odrskih umetnosti“ ostati izven področja uporabe.
Since almost all of their material is covered by third-party intellectual property rights and would therefore remain outside the scope of that Directive, including them within the scope would have little effect.
Njihova vključitev v področje uporabe namreč ne bi imela večjega učinka, saj je skoraj vse njihovo gradivo zajeto s pravicami intelektualne lastnine tretjih oseb, zaradi česar bi ostalo izven področja uporabe navedene direktive.
Digitisation is an important means of ensuring greater access to and re-use of cultural material for education, work or leisure.
Digitalizacija je pomembno sredstvo za zagotavljanje večjega dostopa in ponovne uporabe kulturnega gradiva za izobraževanje, delo ali prosti čas.
It also offers considerable economic opportunities, allowing for an easier integration of cultural material into digital services and products, thus supporting job creation and growth.
Zagotavlja tudi precejšnje gospodarske priložnosti, saj omogoča lažje vključevanje kulturnega gradiva v digitalne storitve in izdelke ter tako spodbuja ustvarjanje delovnih mest in rast.
These aspects were underlined in, amongst others, the European Parliament’s resolution of 5 May 2010 on ‘Europeana — the next steps’ [5], the Commission Recommendation 2011/711/EU of 27 October 2011 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation [6], and the Council conclusions of 10 May 2012 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation [7].
Ti vidiki so bili poleg ostalih poudarjeni v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. maja 2010 z naslovom „Europeana – naslednji koraki“ [5], v Priporočilu Komisije 2011/711/EU z dne 27. oktobra 2011 o digitalizaciji in spletni dostopnosti kulturnega gradiva ter njegovi digitalni hrambi [6] ter v sklepih Sveta z dne 10. maja 2012 o digitalizaciji, spletni dostopnosti kulturnega gradiva in digitalnem arhiviranju [7].