natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 2007 and 2008 thanks to the controlled sale of PZL Dębica’s assets, in addition to the monies referred to in recital (88), the Social Security Office recovered over PLN 5,4 million (see Table 5).
Urad za socialno varnost je v letih 2007 in 2008 z nadzorovano prodajo sredstev PZL Dębica izterjal več kot 5,4 milijona PLN (glej preglednico 5), poleg denarnih sredstev iz uvodne izjave 88.
According to Poland, the lack of sales of company assets after 2008, despite the fact that the Social Security Office held a mortgage on three real estate properties worth more than PLN 6 million in total, must be seen in the economic context in which the sale of PZL Dębica’s assets took place.
Po navedbah Poljske je treba nezadostno prodajo sredstev podjetja po letu 2008 kljub dejstvu, da je imel urad za socialno varnost hipoteko na tri nepremičnine v skupni vrednosti več kot 6 milijonov PLN, obravnavati ob upoštevanju gospodarskih razmer, v katerih so bila prodana sredstva PZL Dębica.
Poland claimed that the economic crisis and reduced scale of business activity in the region had contributed to a lack of interest in PZL Dębica’s assets and had made it difficult to sell them at a price considered acceptable by the Social Security Office.
Poljska je trdila, da sta gospodarska kriza in zmanjšanje obsega poslovnih dejavnosti v regiji prispevala k pomanjkanju zanimanja za sredstva PZL Dębica in otežila prodajo teh sredstev po ceni, ki je bila sprejemljiva za urad za socialno varnost.
On the other hand, as noted above, the Social Security Office had maintained the seizure of PZL Dębica’s account, which brought it a further PLN 475369 between 2007 and 2010.
Po drugi strani, kot je navedeno zgoraj, je urad za socialno varnost zagotovil, da je račun podjetja PZL Dębica ostal zaplenjen, s tem pa je med letoma 2007 in 2010 dobil nadaljnjih 475369 PLN.
Indeed, ongoing enforcement brought the Social Security Office more than PLN 7 million in the period under review (see recital (96)b)); the fact that the debt recovery process took longer was addressed by the compound interest applied to the debt.
Tekoči postopek izterjave je uradu za socialno varnost v obravnavanem obdobju prinesel več kot 7 milijonov PLN (glej uvodno izjavo 96(b)); ker je proces izterjave dolga trajal dlje, so bile za dolg uporabljene obrestne obresti.
The Commission also analysed whether between 2007 and 2012 PZL Dębica had respected the pledges made when the Social Security Office decided in January 2007 not to institute insolvency proceedings against it.
Komisija je presodila tudi, ali je podjetje PZL Dębica v obdobju 2007–2012 spoštovalo zaveze, ki jih je sprejelo, ko se je urad za socialno varnost januarja 2007 odločil, da ne bo začel stečajnega postopka proti podjetju.
The Commission notes that:
Komisija ugotavlja naslednje:
PZL Dębica has been a profitable company since 2006 and managed to attract a private investor in 2010 (see recital (10)); at the same time, its net results were hampered by its ineligibility for public tenders and inability to obtain credit on the market as a result of its outstanding debt;
PZL Dębica je od leta 2006 dobičkonosno podjetje in je leta 2010 uspelo pridobiti zasebnega vlagatelja (glej uvodno izjavo 10); hkrati je bil njegov čisti poslovni izid omejen, ker podjetje ni moglo sodelovati na javnih razpisih in pridobiti kredita na trgu zaradi svojega neporavnanega dolga.
The company has managed to reduce its debt by PLN 7 million since 2006; in addition to the controlled sale of assets and seizure mentioned above, the company met its repayment commitment each year and used its profits and a capital injection of 2010 by a private investor to reduce its debt;
Podjetje je po letu 2006 svoj dolg zmanjšalo za 7 milijonov PLN; poleg zgoraj navedene nadzorovane prodaje sredstev in zaplembe je podjetje vsako leto izpolnilo svojo zavezo v zvezi z odplačilom in zmanjšalo dolg z lastnim dobičkom in kapitalom, ki ga je zasebni vlagatelj vložil leta 2010.
The company has been keeping up with current payments to the Social Security Office and other public authorities since 2006 and therefore, leaving aside a marginal debt of PLN 1900, no new debt has accrued since then.
Podjetje od leta 2006 redno izvaja tekoča plačila uradu za socialno varnost in drugim javnim organom, zato od takrat ni ustvarilo novega dolga, razen zanemarljiv dolg v višini 1900 PLN.
The Commission concludes that PZL Dębica’s return to profitability in 2006, the good prospects for long-term viability and ongoing fulfilment of its current financial obligations since 2006, as well as the entry of the private investor in 2010, are important factors which a private creditor would take into account when deciding whether the course of action adopted in 2007 continued to be the best way to maximise recovery.
Komisija sklepa, da so ponovna vzpostavitev dobičkonosnosti PZL Dębica v letu 2006, dobre možnosti za dolgoročno uspešno poslovanje in stalno izpolnjevanje tekočih finančnih obveznosti od leta 2006 kot tudi vstop zasebnega vlagatelja leta 2010 pomembni dejavniki, ki bi jih zasebni upnik upošteval pri odločanju, ali so ukrepi, sprejeti leta 2007, še vedno najboljši način za izterjavo čim večjega zneska.
Deferral agreement of 1 March 2012
Sporazum o odlogu z dne 1. marca 2012
The test concludes that the Social Security Office should opt for deferral, which guarantees recovery of the full amount of the debt, whereas the liquidation scenario would lead to recovery of some 60 %-70 % of the debt.
Merilo kaže, da bi se moral urad za socialno varnost odločiti za odlog, ki bi zagotovil izterjavo celotnega zneska dolga, medtem ko bi v primeru stečaja lahko izterjal približno 60 %–70 % dolga.
The Commission has critically analysed the report and the assumptions made therein.
Komisija je kritično proučila poročilo in predpostavke, ki so v njem upoštevane.
First, the Commission notes that the test conclusions are based on the analysis of (i) PZL Dębica’s actual economic and financial situation, (ii) the company’s assets and all its liabilities, (iii) the company’s market position, (iv) the results of restructuring and (v) the legal rules and practice applicable to insolvency proceedings in Poland.
Prvič, Komisija ugotavlja, da zaključki merila temeljijo na analizi (i) dejanskega gospodarskega in finančnega stanja PZL Dębica, (ii) sredstev podjetja in vseh njegovih obveznosti, (iii) tržnega položaja podjetja, (iv) rezultatov prestrukturiranja in (v) zakonskih pravil in praks, ki se uporabljajo za stečajne postopke na Poljskem.
In the liquidation scenario, the Social Security Office would be able to recover only about 60 % to 70 % of the debt in 3 or 4 years [27].
Urad za socialno varnost bi v primeru stečaja lahko izterjal le približno 60 %–70 % dolga v 3 ali 4 letih [27].
The reduction in the amount that it is possible to recover results mainly from the high costs of liquidation and the low liquidation value of the company’s assets.
Zmanjšanje zneska, ki ga je mogoče izterjati, je predvsem posledica visokih stroškov likvidacije in nizke likvidacijske vrednosti sredstev podjetja.
As regards the liquidation value, the Commission notes that in the bankruptcy scenario the value of these assets in a fire sale is reduced by about 50 % due to the fact that they will be sold separately and will not be used as a going concern.
Komisija v zvezi z likvidacijsko vrednostjo ugotavlja, da se vrednost teh sredstev, prodanih s prisilno prodajo, v primeru stečaja zmanjša za približno 50 % zaradi dejstva, da bodo prodana ločeno in se ne štejejo za proizvod časovno neomejenega poslovanja.
The figure is also affected by reduced demand for industrial assets in the context of crisis in the real economy, but remains above the average revenue from sales of assets in bankruptcy in Poland, which is 26,86 % of their fair value.
Na vrednost vpliva tudi zmanjšano povpraševanje po industrijskih sredstvih zaradi krize v realnem gospodarstvu, vendar vrednost ostaja nad povprečnimi prihodki od prodaje sredstev v stečajnem postopku na Poljskem, ki znašajo 26,86 % njihove poštene vrednosti.
In the deferral scenario described in recital (44), the report considers the following elements to be important from the perspective of a private creditor seeking to maximise the recovery of the amounts owed to him:
V primeru odloga, ki je opisan v uvodni izjavi 44, poročilo obravnava naslednje elemente kot pomembne z vidika zasebnega upnika, ki si prizadeva v čim večji meri izterjati zneske, ki so mu dolgovani:
the return to profitability by PZL Dębica in 2006 as a result of restructuring;
ponovna vzpostavitev dobičkonosnosti PZL Dębica leta 2006 zaradi prestrukturiranja;
the portfolio of current orders with PZL Dębica and its sales network in Poland and abroad;
portfelj trenutnih naročil v podjetju PZL Dębica in njegova prodajna mreža na Poljskem in v tujini;
the entry of a private investor – Eurotech - in 2010, which acquired 16,7 % of the newly issued shares of PZL Dębica;
vstop zasebnega vlagatelja – podjetja Eurotech – leta 2010, ki je pridobil 16,7 % novoizdanih delnic PZL Dębica;
a letter of intent of 2011 from Eurotech declaring that it wished to inject additional capital and acquire a further 15 % of the company’s shares, subject to the Commission decision;
pismo o nameri iz leta 2011, v katerem je podjetje Eurotech izjavilo, da želi vložiti dodaten kapital in pridobiti nadaljnjih 15 % delnic podjetja v skladu z odločbo Komisije;
the prospect of much better financial results when the company regains access to public tenders and external financing, which is subject to the signature of the deferral agreement;
možnosti za veliko boljše finančne rezultate, ko podjetje ponovno pridobi dostop do javnih razpisov in zunanjega financiranja, kar je odvisno od sklenitve sporazuma o odlogu;
the fact that between 2006 and 2011 PZL Dębica settled its current contributions vis-à-vis all public bodies on time (on average PLN 5 million per year) and
dejstvo, da je podjetje PZL Dębica med letoma 2006 in 2011 pravočasno poravnalo tekoče prispevke vsem javnim organom (povprečno 5 milijonov PLN na leto), in
the fact that thanks to the deferral the Social Security Office will receive an additional PLN 18 million in current social contributions over the eight years in which the debt is repaid.
dejstvo, da bo urad za socialno varnost zaradi odloga prejel dodatnih 18 milijonov PLN v obliki tekočih prispevkov za socialno varnost v obdobju osmih let, v katerem bo odplačan dolg.
The Commission cannot agree to take the final element into account as the compulsory future payments cannot be compared to the revenue a private company could expect from an economic activity.
Komisija ne more upoštevati zadnjega elementa, saj obveznih prihodnjih plačil ni mogoče primerjati s prihodki, ki jih lahko zasebno podjetje pričakuje od gospodarske dejavnosti.
Indeed, collecting compulsory social payments is not an economic activity.
Seveda pobiranje obveznih prispevkov za socialno varnost ni gospodarska dejavnost.
The Commission notes that the signed agreement provides for the recovery of the full amount of the debt due on 1 March 2012 i.e. PLN [7-13 million], comprising debt of PLN [3,5-6,5 million] and interest of PLN [3,5-6,5 million].
Komisija ugotavlja, da sklenitev sporazuma zagotavlja izterjavo celotnega zneska dolga, ki zapade 1. marca 2012, tj. [7-13 milijonov] PLN, kar vključuje dolg v višini [3,5-6,5 milijonov] PLN in obresti v višini [3,5-6,5 milijonov] PLN.
A deferral fee of PLN [1-1,7 million] was added on top of that amount.
Navedenemu znesku je bila dodana pristojbina za odlog v višini [1-1,7 milijona] PLN.
The debt is to be repaid in 96 monthly instalments.
Dolg bo odplačan v 96 mesečnih obrokih.
The Commission also notes that the Social Security Office maintained a pledge on PZL Dębica’s assets of PLN 6243002,55, which the Social Security Office intends to sell in a similar controlled procedure as in the case of the previous assets.
Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da je urad za socialno varnost obdržal zastavno pravico na sredstvih PZL Dębica v višini 6243002,55 PLN, ki jih urad za socialno varnost namerava prodati v podobnem nadzorovanem postopku kot prejšnja sredstva.
Any income from the sale of these assets would be used to reduce PZL Dębica’s debt to the Social Security Office.
Vsi prihodki od prodaje teh sredstev naj bi bili uporabljeni za zmanjšanje dolga PZL Dębica uradu za socialno varnost.
The Commission also notes that the report does not contain a comparison of the present values of inflows in Option 1 and Option 2, which would allow the private creditor to determine which of the two options is more beneficial.
Komisija nadalje ugotavlja, da poročilo ne vsebuje primerjave sedanjih vrednosti dotokov za možnost 1 in možnost 2, s katerimi bi zasebni upnik lahko ugotovil, katera od dveh možnosti je koristnejša.
The Commission calculated these present values for several discount rates, using conservative assumptions, i.e. 3 years in the case of the company’s liquidation and 8 years in the case of deferral.
Komisija je izračunala te sedanje vrednosti več diskontnih mer ob upoštevanju konservativnih domnev, tj. 3 leta v primeru likvidacije podjetja in 8 let v primeru odloga.
Future gains by the Social Security Office originating from current payments were not included in the Commission’s calculation.
V svojih izračunih pa ni upoštevala prihodnjih prihodkov urada za socialno varnost, ki izhajajo iz tekočih plačil.
For all meaningful discount rates a private investor is better off under the deferral scenario than in the case of liquidation.
Glede vseh pomembnih diskontnih mer ima zasebni vlagatelj več koristi v primeru odloga kot v primeru stečaja.
Lastly, the Commission also notes that until November 2012 PZL Dębica paid the nine instalments provided for by the deferral on time.
Nazadnje Komisija ugotavlja, da je podjetje PZL Dębica do novembra 2012 pravočasno plačalo devet obrokov, predvidenih v odlogu.
On that basis, the Commission considers that by agreeing to the deferral in March 2012, the Social Security Office behaved like a private creditor seeking to obtain the payment of sums owed to it by a debtor in financial difficulty.
Komisija na podlagi navedenega meni, da je urad za socialno varnost z odobritvijo odloga v marcu 2012 ravnal kot zasebni upnik, ki si prizadeva doseči plačilo zneskov, ki mu jih dolguje dolžnik v finančnih težavah.
Therefore, the public creditor did not confer an advantage on PZL Dębica.
Javni upnik torej ni zagotovil prednosti podjetju PZL Dębica.
Accordingly, settlement of the outstanding debt on the basis of the deferral laid down in the agreement signed between the company and the Social Security Office in March 2012 does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
V skladu z navedenim poravnava neporavnanega dolga na podlagi odloga iz sporazuma, ki sta ga sklenila podjetje in urad za socialno varnost marca 2012, ni državna pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe.
The Commission considers the aid measures referred to in recital (52) as having been withdrawn.
Komisija meni, da so bili ukrepi pomoči iz uvodne izjave 52 umaknjeni.
Thus, pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, the Commission’s investigation into these measures must be closed.
Zato mora v skladu s členom 8 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 zaključiti preiskavo teh ukrepov.
The Commission considers the aid measures referred to in recital (56) as having been granted before Poland acceded to the EU and not applicable after that date.
Komisija meni, da so bili ukrepi pomoči iz uvodne izjave 56 dodeljeni pred pristopom Poljske k EU in po datumu pristopa ne veljajo več.
They may not be investigated by the Commission under the procedure laid down in Article 108 of the Treaty or under the interim mechanism.
Komisija jih ne more preiskati v skladu s postopkom iz člena 108 Pogodbe ali postopkom začasnega mehanizma.
As regards the measures referred to in recital (59), the Commission notes that any aid made available unlawfully would be considered to have been recovered in accordance with the recovery notice.
Komisija v zvezi z ukrepi iz uvodne izjave 59 ugotavlja, da se za vsako pomoč, ki je bila nezakonito dodeljena, šteje, da je bila vrnjena v skladu z obvestilom o vračilu.
The aid measures referred to in Table 7 fall within the scope of application of Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 and do not exceed the threshold laid down in that Regulation.
Ukrepi pomoči, navedeni v preglednici 7, spadajo v področje uporabe Uredbe št. 69/2001 in ne presegajo praga, določenega v navedeni uredbi.
Lastly, the Commission considers that the measure referred to in recitals (76) to (108) does not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty,
Nazadnje Komisija meni, da ukrep iz uvodnih izjav 76–108 ni pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe,
The procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty instituted by the Commission Decision of 19 December 2008 concerning state aid C 49/08 (ex N 402/08) — Restructuring aid to PZL Dębica is closed in respect of the following measures for PZL Dębica:
Postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe, ki je bil sprožen na podlagi Odločbe Komisije z dne 19. decembra 2008 o državni pomoči C 49/08 (ex N 402/08) – Pomoč za prestrukturiranje podjetja PZL Dębica, je bil zaključen v zvezi z naslednjimi ukrepi za PZL Dębica:
two measures amounting to PLN 4965800 and PLN 5534200, which Poland notified on 13 August 2008 and withdrew on 10 October 2011 pursuant to Article 8 of the Procedural Regulation;
ukrepa v višini 4965800 PLN in 5534200 PLN, ki ju je Poljska priglasila 13. avgusta 2008 in umaknila 10. oktobra 2011 v skladu s členom 8 postopkovne uredbe;
a measure amounting to PLN 914522,15 with regard to which a decision of the Tax Office was issued on 20 October 2003, on the basis that it was granted before Poland acceded to the EU and is not applicable after that date;
ukrep v višini 914522,15 PLN, za katerega je bil 20. oktobra 2003 izdan sklep davčnega urada, na podlagi dejstva, da je bil dodeljen pred pristopom Poljske k EU in po datumu pristopa ne velja več;
a measure with a nominal value of PLN 61104,97, plus interest of PLN 103566,29, settled on 14 August 2012, constituting unlawful aid pursuant to Article 7(5) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
ukrep z nominalno vrednostjo 61104,97 PLN, povečan za obresti v višini 103566,29 PLN, ki je bil poravnan 14. avgusta 2012 in je nezakonita pomoč v skladu s členom 7(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999.
The aid was recovered on 14 August 2012 by Poland in line with the recovery notice [28];
Poljska je pomoč vrnila 14. avgusta 2012 v skladu z obvestilom o vračilu [28];
the five measures for PZL Dębica listed in Table 7, on the grounds that they were de minimis aid within the meaning of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 69/2001;
pet ukrepov za PZL Dębica, ki so navedeni v preglednici 7, ker so pomoč de minimis v smislu člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 69/2001;
the deferral of PLN [7-13 million] awarded to PZL Dębica on the basis of the deferral agreement of 1 March 2012 with the Social Security Office, pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, on the grounds that the measure does not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
odlog v višini [7-13 milijonov] PLN, ki je bil podjetju PZL Dębica dodeljen na podlagi sporazuma o odlogu z uradom za socialno varnost z dne 1. marca 2012, v skladu s členom 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, ker ukrep ni pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe.
This decision is addressed to the Republic of Poland.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Poljsko.
OJ C 53, 6.3.2009, p. 17.
UL C 53, 6.3.2009, str. 17.
August 2012 forecast for 2012 as a whole, based on data for Q1 and Q2 of 2012.
Napoved iz avgusta 2012 za celo leto 2012, pripravljena na podlagi podatkov za prvo in drugo četrtletje leta 2012.
The amount of the debt indicated in the opening decision (PLN 1164900) was corrected by Poland to PLN 1116788,60.
Poljska je znesek dolga, ki je naveden v sklepu o začetku postopka (1164900 PLN), popravila na 1116788,60 PLN.
Journal of Laws No 155, item 1287, as amended.
Uradni list št. 155, točka 1287, kakor je bila spremenjena.
Commission Decision of 6 November 2008 on state aid C 17/05 (ex N 194/05 and PL 34/04) granted by Poland to Stocznia Gdynia (OJ L 33, 4.2.2010, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije z dne 6. novembra 2008 o državni pomoči C 17/05 (ex N 194/05 in PL 34/04) Poljske za Stocznia Gdynia (UL L 33, 4.2.2010, str. 1).
Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 22 February 2005 in case I FSK 630/05 and judgment of the Supreme Court of 12 March 2007 in case I UK 288/06.
Sodba vrhovnega upravnega sodišča z dne 22. februarja 2005 v zadevi I FSK 630/05 in sodba vrhovnega sodišča z dne 12. marca 2007 v zadevi I UK 288/06.
Regulation of the Cabinet of 11 August 2004 on the specific method of calculating the value of state aid awarded in various forms (Journal of Laws No 194, item 1983).
Vladna uredba z dne 11. avgusta 2004 o posebnem načinu izračunavanja vrednosti dodeljene državne pomoči različnih oblik (Uradni list št. 194, točka 1983).
Journal of Laws No 137, item 926, as amended.
Uradni list št. 137, točka 926, kakor je bila spremenjena.
For the applicable recovery rate see: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference_rates.html
Za veljavno obrestno mero za vračilo glej: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference_rates.html
OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.; see in particular Articles 9 and 11.
UL C 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1; glej zlasti člena 9 in 11.
For conversion purposes the Commission used the average exchange rates of the National Bank of Poland on the date of the aid award decision.
Komisija je za pretvorbo uporabila povprečne menjalne tečaje Nacionalne banke Poljske, objavljene na datum sklepa o dodelitvi pomoči.
See http://www.nbp.pl/home.aspx?c=/ascx/archa.ascx
Glej http://www.nbp.pl/home.aspx?c=/ascx/archa.ascx
Case C 256/97 DMT [1999] ECR I-3913, paragraph 30; Case T-36/99 Lenzing v Commission [2004] ECR II-3597, paragraph 137.
Zadeva C-256/97, DMT, Recueil 1999, str. I-3913, točka 30; zadeva T-36/99, Lenzing proti Komisiji, Recueil 2004, str. II-3597, točka 137.
Cf. C-342/96 Tubacex [1999] ECR I-2459, paragraph 46, C-256/97 DMT [1999] ECR I-3913, paragraph 21, C-480/98 Magefesa [2000] ECR I-8717, T-152/99 HAMSA [2002] ECR II-3049, paragraph 167.
Glej C-342/96, Tubacex, Recueil 1999, str. I-2459, točka 46, C-256/97, DMT, Recueil 1999, str. I-3913, točka 21, C-480/98, Magefesa, Recueil 2000, str. I-8717, T-152/99, HAMSA, Recueil 2002, str. II-3049, točka 167.
Case C-124/10 Électricité de France v Commission, judgment of 5.7.2012, not yet published, paragraph 78 citing (see, to that effect, Case C-303/88 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 20; Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraphs 68 to 70; and Comitato ‘Venezia vuole vivere’ and Others v Commission, not yet published, paragraph 91 and the case-law cited).
Zadeva C-124/10, Électricité de France proti Komisiji, sodba z dne 5. 7. 2012, še ni objavljena, sklicevanje v točki 78 (glej v ta namen zadevo C-303/88, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1991, str. I-1433, točka 20; zadevo C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-4397, točke 68 do 70; in Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ in drugi proti Komisiji, še ni objavljeno, točka 91 in navedena sodna praksa).
Case C-124/10 Électricité de France v Commission, judgment of 5.7.2012, not yet published.
Zadeva C-124/10, Électricité de France proti Komisiji, sodba z dne 5. 7. 2012, še ni objavljena.
Case C-256/97 DM Transports [1999] ECR I-3913, paragraph 30.
Zadeva C-256/97, DM Transport, Recueil 1999, str. I-3913, točka 30.
On the basis of data on the length of insolvency proceedings provided by the Supreme Audit Office.
Na podlagi podatkov o trajanju stečajnih postopkov, ki jih je predložil vrhovni revizijski urad.
On 18 August 2011 Poland asked the Commission to refrain from assessing the notified aid until 31 October 2011.
Poljska je 18. avgusta 2011 zaprosila Komisijo, naj se do 31. oktobra 2011 vzdrži ocenjevanja priglašene pomoči.