natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide the test result of the recyclability for wet strength agents and removability for adhesives. The reference test methods are PTS method PTS-RH 021/97 (for wet strength agents), INGEDE Method 12 (for non-soluble adhesive removability) or equivalent test methods. The deinkability shall be proven by using the “Deinking Scorecard” (1) of the European Recovered Paper Council or equivalent test methods. Testing must be performed on three types of paper: uncoated, coated and surface-sized paper. If a type of printing ink is only sold for one or two specific types of paper, it is sufficient to test the paper type(s) in question. The applicant shall provide a declaration that coated and laminated printed paper products are in compliance with point 3(c). Where a part of a printed paper product is easily removable (for instance a plastic cover or a reusable exercise book cover), the recyclability test may be made without this component. The easiness of removal of the non-paper components shall be proven via a declaration of the paper collecting company, the recycling company or an equivalent organisation. Test methods shown by a competent and independent third party as giving equivalent results may also be used.’;
„Ocenjevanje in preverjanje: Vlagatelj zagotovi rezultat testa možnosti recikliranja za vodoodporne agente in testa odstranljivosti za lepila. Referenčne testne metode so metoda PTS – PTS-RH 021/97 (za vodoodporna sredstva), metoda INGEDE 12 (za odstranljivost netopnih lepil) ali enakovredne testne metode. Odstranljivost črnila se dokaže s ‚preglednico za odstranljivost črnila‘ (1) Evropskega sveta za predelan papir ali enakovrednimi testnimi metodami. Testirati je treba tri vrste papirja: nepremazan, premazan in lepljen papir. Če se tiskarsko črnilo prodaja samo za eno ali dve specifični vrsti papirja, zadošča, če se testira zadevna vrsta papirja. Vlagatelj predloži izjavo, da so premazani in kaširani tiskani proizvodi iz papirja v skladu s točko 3(c). Če je del tiskanega proizvoda iz papirja mogoče enostavno odstraniti (na primer plastično platnico ali ponovno uporabno platnico delovnega zvezka), se lahko test možnosti za recikliranje opravi brez tega dela. Enostavno odstranjevanje nepapirnih delov se dokaže z izjavo zbiralnice papirja, podjetja za recikliranje ali podobne organizacije. Uporabijo se lahko tudi testne metode, za katere pristojna in neodvisna tretja oseba dokaže, da zagotavljajo enakovredne rezultate.“
on page 64, Subcriterion 5(b):
Stran 64, podmerilo 5(b):
The amount of waste paper “X” produced shall be:
Količina proizvedenega odpadnega papirja ‚X‘ je:
on page 65, Criterion 9:
Stran 65, merilo 9:
‘Criterion 9 —
„Merilo 9 –
“Please collect used paper for recycling”.
‚Zbirajte star papir za recikliranje.‘
Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a sample of the product packaging bearing the information required.’,
Ocenjevanje in preverjanje: vlagatelj predloži vzorec embalaže proizvoda, na katerem so navedene zahtevane informacije.“
Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a sample of the product bearing the information required.’.
Ocenjevanje in preverjanje: vlagatelj predloži vzorec proizvoda, na katerem so navedene zahtevane informacije.“
of 20 August 2012
z dne 20. avgusta 2012
(notified under document C(2012) 5753)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 5753)
Under Article 3 of that Decision, Member States are to authorise imports of products listed in Part II of the Annex to that Decision which are accompanied by a declaration of the Chinese competent authority stating that each consignment has been subjected before dispatch to a chemical test in order to ensure that the products concerned do not present a danger to human health.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 3 navedene odločbe dovolijo uvoz proizvodov, navedenih v delu II Priloge k navedeni odločbi, ki jim je priložena izjava pristojnega kitajskega organa, da je bil na vsaki pošiljki pred odpremo opravljen kemični preskus za zagotovitev, da zadevni proizvodi niso nevarni za zdravje ljudi.
That test is to be carried out, in particular, with a view to detecting the presence of chloramphenicol and nitrofuran and its metabolites.
Navedeni preskus se mora opraviti zlasti, da se ugotovi morebitna prisotnost kloramfenikola ter nitrofurana in njegovih metabolitov.
The Chinese competent authority has provided an appropriate residue monitoring plan for honey intended for export to the Union.
Pristojni kitajski organ je predložil ustrezen načrt nadzora nad ostanki škodljivih snovi v medu, namenjenemu za izvoz v Unijo.
That plan has been approved by Commission Decision 2011/163/EU of 16 March 2011 on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Article 29 of Council Directive 96/23/EC [3].
Navedeni načrt je bil odobren s Sklepom Komisije 2011/163/EU z dne 16. marca 2011 o odobritvi načrtov, ki so jih predložile tretje države v skladu s členom 29 Direktive Sveta 96/23/ES [3].
Honey and royal jelly are currently included in the list set out in Part II of the Annex to Decision 2002/994/EC.
Med in matični mleček sta trenutno vključena v seznam iz dela II Priloge k Odločbi 2002/994/ES.
Propolis and bee pollen are products that also originate from apiculture and, given the specificities of the production process for those animal products, the risks to animal or public health posed by them is minimal.
Propolis in čebelji cvetni prah sta proizvoda, ki prav tako izvirata iz čebelarstva in, glede na posebnosti proizvodnega postopka za navedena proizvoda živalskega izvora, predstavljata minimalno tveganje za zdravje živali ali ljudi.
In addition, appropriate safety guarantees for those products are provided by the residue monitoring plan for honey intended for export submitted by China and approved by Decision 2011/163/EU.
Poleg tega je za navedena proizvoda zagotovljen ustrezen načrt nadzora nad ostanki škodljivih snovi v medu, namenjenemu izvozu, ki ga je predložila Kitajska in je bil odobren s Sklepom 2011/163/EU.
Propolis and bee pollen should therefore be included in the list of products set out in Part II of the Annex to Decision 2002/994/EC and that Decision should be amended accordingly.
Propolis in čebelji cvetni prah bi bilo zato treba vključiti v seznam proizvodov iz dela II Priloge k Odločbi 2002/994/ES in navedeno odločbo bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
propolis and bee pollen’.
propolis in čebelji cvetni prah“.
Done at Brussels, 20 August 2012.
V Bruslju, 20. avgusta 2012
setting a new deadline for the submission of dossiers for certain substances to be examined under the 14-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o določitvi novega roka za predložitev dosjejev za nekatere snovi, ki jih je treba preučiti v okviru 14-letnega programa dela iz člena 16(2) Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2012) 5787)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 5787)
For a number of substance/product-type combinations included in that list, either all participants have discontinued their participation from the review programme, or no complete dossier was received within the time period specified in Article 9 and Article 12(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007 by the Member State designated as rapporteur for the evaluation.
Za mnoge kombinacije snovi/vrst pripravkov, vključene v navedeni seznam, so se bodisi vsi udeleženci umaknili iz programa pregledovanja bodisi država članica, imenovana za poročevalko pri ocenjevanju, ni prejela celotne dokumentacije do roka iz člena 9 in člena 12(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1451/2007.
That information was also made public by electronic means on 17 January 2011.
Navedeno obvestilo je bilo objavljeno v elektronski obliki 17. januarja 2011.
Within three months of the electronic publication of that information, several companies indicated an interest in taking over the role of participant for some of the substances and product-types concerned, in accordance with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007.
V treh mesecih po elektronski objavi navedenega obvestila je nekaj družb izrazilo zanimanje, da bi prevzele vlogo udeležencev za nekatere zadevne snovi in vrste pripravkov v skladu s členom 12(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1451/2007.
A new deadline should therefore be established for the submission of dossiers for those substances and product-types in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 12(3) of that Regulation.
Zato je treba v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 12(3) navedene uredbe določiti nov rok za predložitev dosjejev za te snovi in vrste pripravkov.
For the substances and product-types set out in the Annex, the new deadline for the submission of dossiers is 30 September 2013.
Za snovi in vrste pripravkov iz Priloge je novi rok za predložitev dosjejev 30. september 2013.
Substances and product-types for which the new deadline for the submission of dossiers is 30 September 2013
Snovi in vrste pripravkov, za katere je novi rok za predložitev dosjejev 30. september 2013
of 21 August 2012
z dne 21. avgusta 2012
pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the Eastern Republic of Uruguay with regard to automated processing of personal data
o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki ga zagotavlja Vzhodna republika Urugvaj pri avtomatizirani obdelavi osebnih podatkov, v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES
(notified under document C(2012) 5704)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2012) 5704)
After consulting the European Data Protection Supervisor [2],
po posvetovanju z evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov [2],
Pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC, Member States are required to provide that the transfer of personal data to a third country may take place only if the third country in question ensures an adequate level of protection and if the Member States’ laws implementing other provisions of the Directive are complied with prior to the transfer.
V skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES morajo države članice zagotoviti, da se prenos osebnih podatkov v tretjo državo lahko izvede le, če tretja država zagotovi ustrezno raven varstva in če se pred prenosom upoštevajo zakoni držav članic, ki izvajajo druge določbe Direktive.
Pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC the level of data protection should be assessed in the light of all the circumstances surrounding a data transfer operation or a set of data transfer operations and giving particular consideration to a number of elements relevant for the transfer and listed in Article 25 thereof.
V skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES je treba raven varstva podatkov oceniti glede na vse okoliščine, ki so povezane s postopkom prenosa podatkov ali nizom postopkov prenosa podatkov, pri čemer je treba skrbno pretehtati vrsto elementov, ki so pomembni za prenos in so našteti v členu 25 Direktive.
Given the different approaches to data protection in third countries, the adequacy assessment should be carried out, and any decision based on Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC should be made and enforced in a way that does not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate against or between third countries where like conditions prevail, nor constitute a disguised barrier to trade, regard being had to the European Union’s present international commitments.
Glede na različne pristope k varstvu podatkov v tretjih državah je treba izvesti oceno ustreznosti in vsako odločitev, sprejeto na podlagi člena 25(6) Direktive 95/46/ES, je treba sprejeti in uveljaviti tako, da ne bo samovoljno ali neupravičeno povzročala diskriminacije do tretjih držav ali med njimi, kadar prevladujejo enaki pogoji, in tudi ne bo prikrito ovirala trgovinske, ob upoštevanju sedanjih mednarodnih zavez Skupnosti.
The Political Constitution of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay, passed in 1967, does not expressly recognise the rights to privacy and the protection of personal data.
Politična ureditev Vzhodne republike Urugvaj, sprejeta leta 1967, temeljnih pravic do zasebnosti in varstva osebnih podatkov ne priznava izrecno.
However, the catalogue of fundamental rights is not a closed list since Article 72 of the Constitution provides that the listing of rights, obligations and guarantees made by the Constitution does not exclude others that are inherent to the human personality or that derive from the republican form of government.
Vendar seznam temeljnih pravic ni zaključen seznam, saj člen 72 Ustave določa, da navedba pravic, obveznosti in zagotovil v Ustavi ne izključuje drugih pravic, ki so same po sebi del človekove osebnosti ali izhajajo iz republiške državne ureditve.
Article 1 of Act No 18.331 on the Protection of Personal Data and ‘Habeas Data’ Action of 11 August 2008 (Ley No 18.331 de Protección de Datos Personales y Acción de ‘Habeas Data’) expressly sets out that ‘the right to the protection of personal data is inherent to the human being and it is therefore included in Article 72 of the Constitution of the Republic’.
Člen 1 Zakona št. 18.331 o varstvu osebnih podatkov in pravnem sredstvu „Habeas Data“ (Ley No 18.331 de Protección de Datos Personales y Acción de „Habeas Data“) z dne 11. avgusta 2008 izrecno določa, da je „pravica do varstva osebnih podatkov neločljivo povezana s človeškim bitjem in je s tem vključena v člen 72 Ustave republike“.
Article 332 of the Constitution provides that the application of the provisions of this Constitution that acknowledge individuals’ rights as well as those awarding rights and imposing obligations on public authorities, shall not be impaired by of the lack of specific regulation; rather, it shall be based, through recourse to the underlying principles of similar laws, on the general principles of the law and generally accepted doctrines.
Člen 332 Ustave določa, da neobstoj posebnih zakonov ne sme zmanjševati uporabe določb te ustave, ki priznavajo pravice posameznika, ter določb, ki podeljujejo pravice in nalagajo obveznosti organom javne uprave. Uporaba teh določb bi morala v skladu s temeljnimi načeli podobnih zakonov temeljiti na splošnih pravnih načelih in splošno sprejetih doktrinah.
The legal standards for the protection of personal data in the Eastern Republic of Uruguay are largely based on the standards set out in Directive 95/46/EC and are laid down in Act No 18.331 on the Protection of Personal Data and ‘Habeas Data’ Action (Ley No 18.331 de Protección de Datos Personales y de Acción de ‘Habeas Data’) of 11 August 2008.
Pravni standardi varstva osebnih podatkov v Vzhodni republiki Urugvaj v veliki meri temeljijo na standardih, določenih v Direktivi 95/46/ES, in so določeni v Zakonu št. 18.331 o varstvu osebnih podatkov in pravnem sredstvu „Habeas Data“ (Ley No 18.331 de Protección de Datos Personales y Acción de „Habeas Data“) z dne 11. avgusta 2008.
It covers natural persons and legal persons.
Ta velja za fizične in pravne osebe.
This Act is further complemented by Decree No 414/009 of 31 August 2009, adopted in order to clarify several aspects of the Act and to lay down the detailed regulation of the organisation, powers and functioning of the data protection supervisory authority; The Preamble of the Decree sets out that it is appropriate to adjust the national legal system on this matter to the most accepted comparable legal regime, essentially that established by European countries through Directive 95/46/EC.
Ta zakon je še dopolnjen z Odlokom št. 414/009 z dne 31. avgusta 2009, ki je bil sprejet za razjasnitev več vidikov navedenega zakona ter za določitev podrobnih zakonov o organizaciji, pooblastilih in delovanju nadzornega organa za varstvo podatkov. V Preambuli navedenega odloka je navedeno, da je treba nacionalni pravni sistem v zvezi s tem prilagoditi najpogostejši primerljivi pravni ureditvi, zlasti tisti, ki so jo evropske države določile z Direktivo 95/46/ES.
Data protection provisions are also contained in a number of special acts that create and regulate databases, namely, acts regulating certain public registries (public deeds, industrial property and trade marks, personal acts, real estate, mining or credit reporting).
Določbe o varstvu podatkov prav tako vsebujejo številni posebni zakoni, s katerimi se oblikujejo in urejajo podatkovne baze, namreč zakoni o nekaterih javnih registrih (javne listine, industrijska lastnina in blagovne znamke, osebni dokumenti, zemljiška knjiga, pravice rudarjenja ali poročila o plačilni sposobnosti).
Act No 18.331 applies additionally to these acts in relation to those issues that are not governed by these specific legal instruments, pursuant to Article 332 of the Constitution.
Zakon št. 18.331 se uporablja tudi za te zakone v zvezi s tistimi vprašanji, ki niso urejena s temi posebnimi pravnimi akti, v skladu s členom 332 Ustave.
The legal data protection standards applicable in the Eastern Republic of Uruguay cover all the basic principles necessary for an adequate level of protection for natural persons, and also provide for exceptions and limitations in order to safeguard important public interests.
Pravni standardi varstva podatkov, ki se uporabljajo Vzhodni republiki Urugvaj, zajemajo vsa osnovna načela, ki so nujna za ustrezno stopnjo varstva za fizične osebe, ter določa tudi izjeme in omejitve za zavarovanje pomembnih javnih interesov.
These legal data protection standards and the exceptions reflect the principles laid down by Directive 95/46/EC.
Ti pravni standardi varstva podatkov in izjeme upoštevajo načela, določena z Direktivo 95/46/ES.
The application of the legal data protection standards is guaranteed by administrative and judicial remedies, in particular, by the ‘habeas data’ action, which enables a data subject to take a data controller to court in order to enforce his right of access, rectification and deletion, and by independent supervision carried out by the supervisory authority, the Unit for the Regulation and Control of Personal Data (Unidad Reguladora y de Control de Datos Personales (URCDP)), which is invested with powers of investigation, intervention and sanction in line with Article 28 of Directive 95/46/EC, and which acts completely independently. Moreover, any interested party is entitled to seek judicial redress for compensation for damages suffered as a result of the unlawful processing of his personal data.
Uporaba pravnih standardov varstva podatkov je zagotovljena z upravnim in sodnim varstvom, zlasti s pravnim sredstvom „habeas data“, ki posamezniku, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, omogoča, da zoper upravljavca podatkov začne postopek pred sodiščem zaradi uveljavljanja pravice do dostopa, popravka ali izbrisa podatkov, ter z neodvisnim nadzorom, ki ga izvaja nadzorni organ, namreč Enota za urejanje in nadzor osebnih podatkov (Unidad Reguladora y de Control de Datos Personales (URCDP), ki ima pooblastila za preiskavo, posredovanje in kaznovanje v skladu s členom 28 Direktive 95/46/ES ter deluje povsem neodvisno. Poleg tega lahko vsaka oseba s pravnim interesom uporabi pravna sredstva za povračilo škode, nastale zaradi nezakonite obdelave njenih osebnih podatkov.
Uruguayan data protection authorities have provided explanations and assurances as to how the Uruguayan law is to be interpreted, and have given assurances that the Uruguayan data protection legislation is implemented in accordance with such interpretation.
Urugvajski organi za varstvo podatkov so priskrbeli razlage in zagotovila glede načina razlage urugvajskih zakonov ter podali zagotovila, da se urugvajska zakonodaja o varstvu podatkov izvaja v skladu s tako razlago.
In particular, Uruguayan data protection authorities have explained that, pursuant to Article 332 of the Constitution, Act No 18.331 applies additionally to special acts that create and regulate specific databases in relation to those issues that are not governed by these specific legal instruments.
Urugvajski organi za varstvo podatkov so predvsem pojasnili, da se v skladu s členom 332 Ustave Zakon št. 18.331 uporablja tudi za posebne zakone, s katerimi se oblikujejo in urejajo posebne podatkovne baze v zvezi s tistimi vprašanji, ki niso urejena s temi posebnimi pravnimi akti.
They have also clarified that, regarding the lists referred to in Article 9 C) of Act No 18.331, and which do not require the consent of the data subject for the processing, the Act also applies, namely the principles of proportionality and finality, the rights of data subjects and that they are subject to the supervision by the data protection authority.
Prav tako so pojasnili, da se določbe navedenega zakona uporabljajo tudi glede seznamov, ki so navedeni v členu 9(C) Zakona št. 18.331 in se za njihovo obdelavo ne zahteva privolitev posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, in sicer se uporabljajo zlasti določbe o načelih sorazmernosti in dokončnosti, pravicah posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, ter o nadzoru organa za varstvo podatkov.
With regard to the transparency principle, the Uruguayan data protection authorities have informed that the obligation to provide the data subject with the necessary information applies in all cases.
Urugvajski organi za varstvo podatkov so glede načela preglednosti sporočili, da se obveznost obveščanja posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, o nujnih informacijah, upošteva v vseh primerih.
Regarding the right of access, the data protection authority has clarified that it is sufficient for a data subject to prove its identity when making a request.
Glede pravice dostopa do podatkov so organi za varstvo podatkov pojasnili, da zadostuje, da posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ob zahtevi za dostop izkaže svojo identiteto.
The Uruguayan data protection authorities have clarified that the exceptions relating to the principle on international transfers laid down in Article 23(1) of Act No 18.331 cannot be understood as having a broader application than that of Article 26(1) of Directive 95/46/EC.
Urugvajski organi za varstvo podatkov so pojasnili, da izjem v zvezi z načelom mednarodnih prenosov iz člena 23(1) Zakona št. 18.331 ni mogoče razumeti, kot da imajo širše področje uporabe od izjem iz člena 26(1) Direktive 95/46/ES.
This Decision takes into account these explanations and assurances and it is based upon them.
Ta sklep upošteva te razlage in zagotovila ter temelji na njih.