natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Notwithstanding Article 8(3) and points (a) and (b) of the first paragraph of Article 12 of this Regulation, for the implementation of the administrative cooperation provisions of the SOLVIT Recommendation through IMI, the involvement of the Commission in administrative cooperation procedures and the existing facility for external actors may continue on the basis of the arrangements that were made prior to the entry into force of this Regulation.
Ne glede na člen 8(3) ter točki (a) in (b) prvega odstavka člena 12 te uredbe se za izvajanje določb o upravnem sodelovanju iz priporočila SOLVIT prek IMI sodelovanje Komisije v postopkih upravnega sodelovanja in obstoječi instrument za zunanje udeležence lahko nadaljujeta na podlagi dogovorov, sklenjenih pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe.
The period as referred to in Article 14(1) of this Regulation shall be 18 months for personal data processed in IMI for the purposes of the SOLVIT Recommendation.
Za osebne podatke, obdelane v IMI za namene priporočila SOLVIT, je obdobje iz člena 14(1) te uredbe 18 mesecev.
Notwithstanding Article 4(1) of this Regulation, the Commission may launch a pilot project to assess whether IMI is an efficient, cost-effective and user-friendly tool to implement Article 3(4), (5) and (6) of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce) [13].
Ne glede na člen 4(1) te uredbe lahko Komisija začne pilotni projekt, da oceni, ali je IMI učinkovito, stroškovno učinkovito in uporabniku prijazno orodje za izvajanje člena 3(4), (5) in (6) Direktive 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju) [13].
No later than two years after the launch of that pilot project, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council the evaluation referred to in Article 4(2) of this Regulation, which shall also cover the interaction between administrative cooperation within the consumer protection cooperation system established in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) [14] and within IMI.
Komisija najpozneje dve leti po začetku tega pilotnega projekta Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži oceno iz člena 4(2) te uredbe, ki zajema tudi medsebojni vpliv upravnega sodelovanja v okviru sistema sodelovanja na področju varstva potrošnikov, ustanovljenega v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov („Uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov“) [14], in v okviru IMI.
Notwithstanding Article 14(1) of this Regulation, any periods up to a maximum of 18 months decided on the basis of Article 36 of Directive 2006/123/EC with regard to administrative cooperation pursuant to Chapter VI thereof shall continue to apply in that area.
Ne glede na člen 14(1) te uredbe se vsa obdobja do največ 18 mesecev, določena na podlagi člena 36 Direktive 2006/123/ES v zvezi z upravnim sodelovanjem na podlagi poglavja VI navedene direktive, na tem področju še naprej uporabljajo.
OJ C 43, 15.2.2012, p. 14.
UL C 43, 15.2.2012, str. 14.
OJ L 331, 15.12.2001, p. 79.
UL L 331, 15.12.2001, str. 79.
OJ C 48, 18.2.2012, p. 2.
UL C 48, 18.2.2012, str. 2.
PROVISIONS ON ADMINISTRATIVE COOPERATION IN UNION ACTS THAT ARE IMPLEMENTED BY MEANS OF IMI, REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3
DOLOČBE O UPRAVNEM SODELOVANJU IZ AKTOV UNIJE, KI SE IZVAJAJO PREK IMI, IZ ČLENA 3
Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market [1]: Chapter VI, Article 39(5), as well as Article 15(7), unless a notification, as provided for in that latter Article, is made in accordance with Directive 98/34/EC.
Direktiva 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu [1]: poglavje VI, člen 39(5) in tudi člen 15(7), razen če je obvestilo, kot določa člen 15(7), poslano v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES.
Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications [2]: Article 8, Article 50(1), (2) and (3), and Article 56.
Direktiva Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta 2005/36/ES z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij [2]: člen 8, člen 50(1), (2) in (3) ter člen 56.
Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare [3]: Article 10(4).
Direktiva 2011/24/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2011 o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov pri čezmejnem zdravstvenem varstvu [3]: člen 10(4).
Regulation (EU) No 1214/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the professional cross-border transport of euro cash by road between euro-area Member States [4]: Article 11(2).
Uredba (EU) št. 1214/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. novembra 2011 o profesionalnem čezmejnem prevozu eurogotovine po cesti med državami članicami euroobmočja [4]: člen 11(2).
Commission Recommendation of 7 December 2001 on principles for using ‘SOLVIT’ — the Internal Market Problem Solving Network [5]: Chapters I and II.
Priporočilo Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2001 o načelih za uporabo mreže SOLVIT za reševanje problemov notranjega trga [5]: poglavji I in II.
OJ L 316, 29.11.2011, p. 1.
UL L 316, 29.11.2011, str. 1.
The Commission Communication of 13 April 2011 entitled ‘Single Market Act: Twelve Levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence — “Working together to create new growth”’ stresses the importance of IMI for strengthening cooperation among the actors involved, including at local level, thus contributing to better governance of the single market.
V sporočilu Komisije z dne 13. aprila 2011 z naslovom „Akt za enotni trg: Dvanajst pobud za okrepitev rasti in zaupanja – ‚Skupaj za novo rast‘“ je poudarjen pomen IMI za krepitev sodelovanja med vključenimi udeleženci, tudi na lokalni ravni, kar bi prispevalo k boljšemu upravljanju enotnega trga.
It is therefore necessary to establish a sound legal framework for IMI and a set of common rules to ensure that IMI functions efficiently.
Zato je treba vzpostaviti trden pravni okvir za IMI in določiti skupna pravila za zagotovitev učinkovitega delovanja IMI.
The use of IMI for the technical support of the SOLVIT network should be without prejudice to the informal character of the SOLVIT procedure which is based on a voluntary commitment of the Member States, in accordance with the Commission Recommendation of 7 December 2001 on principles for using ‘SOLVIT’ — the Internal Market Problem Solving Network [5] (‘the SOLVIT Recommendation’).
Uporaba IMI v okviru tehnične podpore mreži SOLVIT ne bi smela posegati v neformalno naravo postopka SOLVIT, ki je zasnovan na prostovoljni zavezi držav članic v skladu s Priporočilom Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2001 o načelih za uporabo mreže SOLVIT za reševanje problemov notranjega trga [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: priporočilo o SOLVIT).
To continue the functioning of the SOLVIT network on the basis of existing work arrangements, one or more tasks of the national IMI coordinator may be assigned to SOLVIT centres within the remit of their work, so that they can function independently from the national IMI coordinator.
Da bi se delovanje mreže SOLVIT nadaljevalo na podlagi sedanje organizacije dela, se lahko ena ali več nalog nacionalnega koordinatorja IMI dodeli centrom SOLVIT na njihovem področju dela, tako da lahko delujejo neodvisno od nacionalnega koordinatorja IMI.
The processing of personal data and of confidential information as part of SOLVIT procedures should benefit from all guarantees set out in this Regulation, without prejudice to the non-binding character of the SOLVIT Recommendation.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov in zaupnih informacij v okviru postopkov SOLVIT bi morala brez poseganja v nezavezujoče priporočilo o SOLVIT potekati v skladu z vsemi zagotovili iz te uredbe.
Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o evropski standardizaciji, spremembi direktiv Sveta 89/686/EGS in 93/15/EGS ter direktiv 94/9/ES, 94/25/ES, 95/16/ES, 97/23/ES, 98/34/ES, 2004/22/ES, 2007/23/ES, 2009/23/ES in 2009/105/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter razveljavitvi Sklepa Sveta 87/95/EGS in Sklepa št. 1673/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
The primary objective of standardisation is the definition of voluntary technical or quality specifications with which current or future products, production processes or services may comply.
Glavni cilj standardizacije je opredelitev prostovoljnih tehničnih specifikacij ali specifikacij kakovosti, ki jih lahko izpolnjujejo sedanji ali prihodnji proizvodi, proizvodni procesi ali storitve.
Standardisation can cover various issues, such as standardisation of different grades or sizes of a particular product or technical specifications in product or services markets where compatibility and interoperability with other products or systems are essential.
Standardizacija lahko zajema različna vprašanja, kot so standardizacija različnih stopenj ali velikosti določenega proizvoda, ali tehnične specifikacije na trgih proizvodov ali storitev, za katera sta združljivost in interoperabilnost z drugimi proizvodi ali sistemi bistveni.
European standardisation reinforces the global competitiveness of European industry especially when established in coordination with the international standardisation bodies, namely the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
Evropska standardizacija krepi svetovno konkurenčnost evropske industrije, zlasti kadar je določena z usklajevanjem z mednarodnimi organi za standardizacijo, in sicer Mednarodno organizacijo za standardizacijo (ISO), Mednarodno elektrotehniško komisijo (IEC) in Mednarodno zvezo za telekomunikacije (ITU).
Standards produce significant positive economic effects, for example by promoting economic interpenetration on the internal market and encouraging the development of new and improved products or markets and improved supply conditions.
Standardi ustvarjajo pomembne pozitivne gospodarske učinke, na primer s spodbujanjem gospodarskega prepletanja na notranjem trgu ter razvoja novih in izboljšanih proizvodov ali trgov in izboljšanih pogojev dobave.
Standards thus normally increase competition and lower output and sales costs, benefiting economies as a whole and consumers in particular.
Standardi tako običajno povečajo konkurenco ter zmanjšajo stroške proizvodnje in prodaje, s čimer koristijo gospodarstvu kot celoti, zlasti potrošnikom.
Standards may maintain and enhance quality, provide information and ensure interoperability and compatibility, thereby increasing safety and value for consumers.
Na podlagi standardov se lahko ohranja ali povečuje kakovost ter zagotavljajo informacije, interoperabilnost in združljivost, s čimer se povečuje tudi varnost in pomembnost za potrošnike.
European standards are adopted by the European standardisation organisations, namely CEN, Cenelec and ETSI.
(4) Evropske standarde sprejemajo evropske organizacije za standardizacijo, in sicer CEN, Cenelec in ETSI.
European standards play a very important role within the internal market, for instance through the use of harmonised standards in the presumption of conformity of products to be made available on the market with the essential requirements relating to those products laid down in the relevant Union harmonisation legislation.
(5) Evropski standardi imajo na notranjem trgu zelo pomembno vlogo, na primer preko uporabe harmoniziranih standardov za zagotavljanje skladnosti proizvodov, ki bodo dani na trg, z bistvenimi zahtevami za te proizvode, ki jih določa ustrezna usklajevalna zakonodaja Unije.
Those requirements should be precisely defined in order to avoid misinterpretation on the part of the European standardisation organisations.
Te zahteve bi bilo treba natančno opredeliti, da se s tem prepreči, da bi si jih evropske organizacije za standardizacijo napačno razlagale.
Standardisation plays an increasingly important role in international trade and the opening-up of markets.
Standardizacija je v mednarodni trgovini in pri odpiranju trgov čedalje pomembnejša.
The Union should seek to promote cooperation between European standardisation organisations and international standardisation bodies.
Unija bi si morala prizadevati za spodbujanje sodelovanja med evropskimi organizacijami za standardizacijo in mednarodnimi organi za standardizacijo.
The Union should also promote bilateral approaches with third countries to coordinate standardisation efforts and promote European standards, for instance when negotiating agreements or by seconding standardisation experts to third countries.
Prav tako bi morala Unija za usklajevanje prizadevanj na področju standardizacije spodbujati dvostranske pristope s tretjimi državami in uporabo evropskih standardov, na primer pri pogajanjih o sporazumih ali s pošiljanjem strokovnjakov za standardizacijo v tretje države.
Furthermore the Union should encourage contact between European standardisation organisations and private forums and consortia, while maintaining the primacy of European standardisation.
Nadalje bi morala Unija spodbujati stike med evropskimi organizacijami za standardizacijo in zasebnimi forumi ter konzorciji in hkrati ohranjati primarnost evropske standardizacije.
European standardisation is governed by a specific legal framework consisting of three different legal acts, namely Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services [3], Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 on the financing of European standardisation [4] and Council Decision 87/95/EEC of 22 December 1986 on standardisation in the field of information technology and telecommunications [5].
(7) Evropsko standardizacijo ureja poseben pravni okvir, ki ga sestavljajo trije različni pravni akti, in sicer Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov ter predpisov o storitvah informacijske družbe [3], Sklep št. 1673/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o financiranju evropske standardizacije [4] in Sklep Sveta 87/95/EGS z dne 22. decembra 1986 o standardizaciji na področju informacijske tehnologije in telekomunikacij [5].
However, the current legal framework is no longer up to date with developments in European standardisation over recent decades.
Vendar veljavni pravni okvir v zadnjih desetletjih ne sledi več razvoju evropske standardizacije.
Therefore, the current legal framework should be simplified and adapted in order to cover new aspects of standardisation to reflect those latest developments and future challenges in European standardisation.
Zato bi bilo treba sedanji pravni okvir poenostaviti in prilagoditi, tako da bo zajemal nove vidike standardizacije ter odražal najnovejše spremembe in prihodnje izzive evropske standardizacije.
That relates in particular to the increased development of standards for services and the evolution of standardisation deliverables other than formal standards.
To se nanaša zlasti na pospešen razvoj standardov za storitve in razvoj standardizacijskih dokumentov, pri katerih ne gre za uradne standarde.
The European Parliament’s Resolution of 21 October 2010 on the future of European standardisation [6], as well as the report of the Expert Panel for the Review of the European Standardization System (Express) of February 2010 entitled ‘Standardization for a competitive and innovative Europe: a vision for 2020’, have set out an important number of strategic recommendations regarding the review of the European standardisation system.
V resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. oktobra 2010 o prihodnosti evropske standardizacije [6] in v poročilu skupine strokovnjakov za pregled evropskega standardizacijskega sistema (Express) iz februarja 2010 z naslovom "Standardizacija za konkurenčno in inovativno Evropo: vizija za leto 2020" se nahajajo številna strateška priporočila v zvezi s pregledom evropskega standardizacijskega sistema.
In order to ensure the effectiveness of standards and standardisation as policy tools for the Union, it is necessary to have an effective and efficient standardisation system which provides a flexible and transparent platform for consensus building between all participants and which is financially viable.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti standardov in standardizacije kot orodij politik Unije je nujen učinkovit in uspešen sistem standardizacije, ki zagotavlja prilagodljivo in pregledno platformo za doseganje konsenza med vsemi udeleženci ter je finančno sprejemljiv.
Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market [7] establishes general provisions facilitating the exercise of the freedom of establishment for service providers and the free movement of services, while maintaining a high quality of services.
Direktiva 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o storitvah na notranjem trgu [7] uvaja splošne določbe, ki ponudnikom storitev olajšujejo uveljavljanje svobode ustanavljanja in prostega pretoka storitev ter hkrati ohranjajo visoko raven kakovosti storitev.
It obliges the Member States to encourage, in cooperation with the Commission, the development of voluntary European standards with the aim of facilitating compatibility between services supplied by providers in different Member States, the provision of information to the recipient and the quality of service provision.
Države članice zavezuje, da v sodelovanju s Komisijo spodbujajo razvoj prostovoljnih evropskih standardov za zagotovitev združljivosti storitev, ki jih opravljajo ponudniki v različnih državah članicah, zagotavljanje informacij prejemniku in kakovost zagotavljanja storitev.
However, Directive 98/34/EC only applies to standards for products while standards for services are not expressly covered by it.
Vendar pa se Direktiva 98/34/ES uporablja le za standarde za proizvode, medtem ko standardi za storitve niso izrecno zajeti.
Furthermore, the delineation between services and goods is becoming less relevant in the reality of the internal market.
Poleg tega je razmejitev med storitvami in blagom ob upoštevanju dejanskega stanja notranjega trga vse manj pomembna.
In practice, it is not always possible to clearly distinguish standards for products from standards for services.
Jasno razlikovanje med standardi za proizvode in standardi za storitve v praksi ni vedno mogoče.
Many standards for products have a service component while standards for services often also partly relate to products.
Veliko standardov za proizvode vključuje element storitev, standardi za storitve pa se pogosto delno nanašajo tudi na proizvode.
Thus, it is necessary to adapt the current legal framework to these new circumstances by extending its scope to standards for services.
Zato je treba veljavni pravni okvir prilagoditi tem novim razmeram z razširitvijo njegovega področja uporabe na standarde za storitve.
Like other standards, standards for services are voluntary and should be market-driven, whereby the needs of the economic operators and stakeholders directly or indirectly affected by such standards prevail, and should take into account the public interest and be based on the founding principles, including consensus.
Tako kot drugi standardi so tudi standardi za storitve prostovoljni in bi morali biti tržno usmerjeni, pri čemer bi morale imeti prednost potrebe gospodarskih subjektov in zainteresiranih strani, ki jih ti standardi neposredno ali posredno zadevajo, ter bi morali upoštevati javni interes in temeljiti na temeljnih načelih, vključno konsenzu.
They should primarily focus on services linked to products and processes.
Standardi bi morali biti osredotočeni zlasti na storitve, povezane s proizvodi in postopki.
The legal framework allowing the Commission to request one or several European standardisation organisations to draft a European standard or European standardisation deliverable for services should be applied while fully respecting the distribution of competences between the Union and the Member States as laid down in the Treaties.
Pravni okvir, ki Komisiji omogoča, da od ene ali več evropskih organizacij za standardizacijo zahteva osnutek evropskega standarda ali evropskega standardizacijskega dokumenta za storitve bi se moral uporabiti, ob polnem upoštevanju razdelitve pristojnosti med Unijo in državami članicami, kot je določeno v Pogodbah.
This concerns in particular Articles 14, 151, 152, 153, 165, 166 and 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Protocol (No 26) on Services of General Interest annexed to the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and to the TFEU in accordance with which it remains the exclusive competence of the Member States to define the fundamental principles of their social security, vocational training and health systems and to shape the framework conditions for the management, financing, organisation and delivery of the services supplied within those systems, including - without prejudice to Article 168(4) TFEU and to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications [8] - the definition of requirements, quality and safety standards applicable to them.
To zadeva zlasti člene 14, 151, 152, 153, 165, 166 in 168 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) ter Protokol (št. 26) o storitvah splošnega interesa, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji (PEU) in PDEU, v skladu s katerimi ostaja v izključni pristojnosti držav članic, da opredelijo temeljna načela njihove socialne varnosti, poklicnega usposabljanja in zdravstvenih sistemov ter oblikujejo okvirne pogoje za upravljanje, financiranje, organizacijo in zagotavljanje opravljenih storitev v okviru teh sistemov, vključno z - vendar brez poseganja v člen 168(4) PDEU in Direktivo 2005/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij [8] - opredelitvijo zahtev, kakovosti, varnostnih standardov, ki se uporabljajo zanje.
The Commission should not, by means of such a request, affect the right to negotiate, conclude and enforce collective agreements and to take industrial action in accordance with national law and practices which respect Union law.
Komisija s takšno zahtevo ne bi smela vplivati na pravico do pogajanja, sklepanja in izvajanja kolektivnih pogodb ter pravico do stavke v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in prakso, ki spoštujejo pravo Unije.
The European standardisation organisations are subject to competition law to the extent that they can be considered to be an undertaking or an association of undertakings within the meaning of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
Za evropske organizacije za standardizacijo velja konkurenčno pravo, če jih je mogoče šteti za podjetje ali združenje podjetij v smislu členov 101 in 102 PDEU.