natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Administrative body (name, address, e-mail address, and other contact details where necessary) in charge of coordinating the information provided in this form:
Upravni organ (naziv, naslov, elektronski naslov in po potrebi drugi kontaktni podatki), pristojen za usklajevanje informacij iz tega obrazca:
Please tick the applicable box:
Označite ustrezno polje:
 Adoption of a new waste management plan
 Sprejetje novega načrta ravnanja z odpadki
 Substantial revision of a waste management plan
 Bistvena revizija načrta ravnanja z odpadki
(Important: Please indicate the relevant page number(s) of the notified plan and/or reference document related to each question)
(Pomembno: pri vsakem vprašanju navedite ustrezne številke strani priglašenega načrta in/ali referenčni dokument)
General Information
Splošne informacije
Date of adoption/revision (month/year):
Datum sprejetja/revizije (mesec/leto):
Does the plan cover the entire territory of the Member State?
Ali načrt zajema celotno ozemlje države članice?
If no, please indicate what parts of the territory are not covered and provide reasons:
Če je odgovor nikalen, navedite, kateri deli ozemlja niso zajeti in navedite razloge:
What is the scope of the waste management plan?
Kaj obsega načrt ravnanja z odpadki?
 All waste streams
 Vse tokove odpadkov
 Municipal solid waste
 Trdne komunalne odpadke
 Hazardous waste
 Nevarne odpadke
If the plan does not cover all waste streams, please indicate the relevant additional plans:
Če načrt ne zajema vseh tokov odpadkov, navedite ustrezne dodatne načrte:
Does the plan comply with the requirements of Directive 2008/98/EC?
Ali je načrt skladen z zahtevami Direktive 2008/98/ES?
If no, please indicate the reasons:
Če je odgovor nikalen, navedite razloge:
Is the plan designed in accordance with the waste hierarchy set out in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC?
Ali je bil načrt zasnovan v skladu s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki iz člena 4 Direktive 2008/98/ES?
If no, please specify for which waste streams the plan deviates from the waste hierarchy and the reasons for such deviations:
Če je odgovor nikalen, navedite tokove odpadkov, pri katerih načrt odstopa od hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki in razloge za taka odstopanja:
Does the plan include any waste prevention programme?
Ali načrt vsebuje programe preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov?
If yes, please provide the relevant website links:
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, navedite ustrezne spletne povezave:
How did the relevant stakeholders and authorities and the general public participate in the elaboration of the waste management plans and waste prevention programmes?
Na kakšen način so pomembni deležniki, upravni organi in javnost sodelovali pri pripravi načrtov ravnanja z odpadki in programov preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov?
Information on collection schemes and waste treatment installations
Podatki o sistemih zbiranja in obratih za obdelavo odpadkov
Does the plan assess the need for new collection schemes and major disposal/recovery installation and related investments?
Ali so v načrtu ocenjene potrebe po novih sistemih zbiranja in večjih obratih za odstranjevanje / predelavo ter z njimi povezanih naložbah?
Does the plan provide information about the location of planned disposal or major recovery installations and the criteria for the choice of that location?
Ali načrt vsebuje podatke o lokacijah načrtovanih odlagališč ali večjih obratov za predelavo odpadkov in merila za izbiro teh lokacij?
If yes, please indicate where these criteria are set out in the plan:
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, navedite, kje v načrtu so ta merila določena:
Information on waste-related targets
Informacije o ciljih, povezanih z odpadki
Are packaging and packaging waste covered by the plan (Article 14 of European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC [1])
Ali načrt zajema embalažo in odpadno embalažo (člen 14 Direktive 94/62/ES [1] Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta)
Does the plan set out strategies or measures for the implementation of the reduction of biodegradable waste going to landfills (Article 5 of Council Directive 1999/31/EC [2])
Ali so v načrtu določene strategije ali ukrepi za izvajanje zmanjševanja količine biološko razgradljivih odpadkov, ki se odlagajo na odlagališčih (člen 5 Direktive Sveta 1999/31/ES [2])
Does the plan contribute to reach the landfill biodegradable diversion targets?
Ali načrt prispeva k doseganju ciljev glede preusmerjanja biološko razgradljivih odpadkov z odlagališč?
Does the plan evaluate the usefulness and suitability of economic and other instruments, e. g. landfill taxes, in addressing waste issues?
Ali je v načrtu ovrednotena uporabnost in primernost ekonomskih in drugih instrumentov, na primer dajatev na odlaganje, pri reševanju vprašanj v zvezi z odpadki?
If yes, please specify which economic instruments and related measures have been included in the plan:
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, navedite, kateri ekonomski instrumenti in z njimi povezani ukrepi so bili vključeni v načrt:
OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10.
UL L 365 z dne 31.12.1994, str. 10.
OJ L 182, 16.7.1999, p. 1.
UL L 182 z dne 16.7.1999, str. 1.
FORMAT FOR NOTIFYING THE INFORMATION ON THE ADOPTION AND SUBSTANTIAL REVISIONS OF THE WASTE PREVENTION PROGRAMMES
OBLIKA ZA SPOROČANJE INFORMACIJ O SPREJETJU IN BISTVENIH REVIZIJAH PROGRAMOV PREPREČEVANJA NASTAJANJA ODPADKOV
Electronic link to a publicly available website for this programme:
Elektronska povezava do javno dostopne spletne strani za ta program:
Administrative body (name, address, e-mail address and other contact details where necessary) responsible for the adoption/revision of the programme:
Upravni organ (naziv, naslov, elektronski naslov in po potrebi drugi kontaktni podatki), odgovoren za sprejem / revizijo programa:
Administrative body (name, address, e-mail address, and other contact details where necessary) in charge of coordinating these answers:
Upravni organ (naziv, naslov, elektronski naslov in po potrebi drugi kontaktni podatki), pristojen za usklajevanje teh odgovorov:
 Adoption of a new waste prevention programme
 Sprejetje novega programa preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov
 Substantial revision of a waste prevention programme [1]
 Bistvena revizija programa preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov [1]
In case of a notification of a substantial revision of a waste prevention programme, which plan/programme does this revision refer to?
V primeru priglasitve bistvene revizije programa preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov, na kateri načrt/program se ta revizija nanaša?
Please describe briefly the scope and the main elements of the revision, indicating where the revised elements can be found within the waste prevention programme:
Na kratko opišite obseg in glavne elemente revizije, z navedbo, kje v programu preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov je mogoče najti revidirane elemente:
(Important: Please indicate the relevant page number(s) of the notified programme and/or reference document related to each question)
(Pomembno: pri vsakem vprašanju navedite ustrezne številke strani priglašenega programa in/ali referenčni dokument)
Does the programme cover the entire territory of your Member State?
Ali program pokriva celotno ozemlje vaše države članice?
Is the programme integrated into a waste management plan?
Ali je program vključen v načrt ravnanja z odpadki?
If yes, please specify the waste management plan(s):
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, navedite načrte ravnanja z odpadki:
Is the programme included in other environmental policy programme(s)?
Ali je program vključen v druge programe okoljske politike?
If yes, please specify the programme(s):
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, navedite programe:
Information on waste prevention
Informacije o preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov
Does the programme describe the existing prevention measures?
Ali so v programu opisani obstoječi ukrepi preprečevanja?
Does the programme set out waste prevention objectives?
Ali so v programu določeni cilji preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov?
To what extent do the objectives and measures aim at the decoupling of economic growth from the environmental impacts of waste generation?
V kolikšni meri so ti cilji in ukrepi usmerjeni v ločevanje gospodarske rasti od okoljskih učinkov nastajanja odpadkov?
Does the programme specify quantitative and/or qualitative benchmarks for adopted waste prevention measures?
Ali so v programu opredeljena količinska in/ali kakovostna referenčna merila za sprejete ukrepe preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov?
If yes, please indicate whether they are qualitative and/or quantitative and the relevant page number(s):
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, navedite, ali so ta merila kakovostna in/ali količinska ter ustrezne številke strani:
Does the programme determine specific qualitative and/or quantitative targets and indicators?
Ali program vsebuje posebne kakovostne in/ali količinske cilje in kazalnike?
Only applicable if a waste prevention programme has already been notified to the European Commission.
Uporablja se samo, če je bil program preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov že sporočen Evropski komisiji.
 Specific waste streams. Please specify:
 Posebne tokove odpadkov; navedite jih:
establishing the position to be taken by the European Union within the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization as regards an extension of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions and the moratorium on non-violation and situation complaints
o določitvi stališča, ki ga bo zastopala Evropska unija v okviru ministrske konference Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v zvezi s podaljšanjem moratorija na carine za elektronske prenose in moratorija na pritožbe, ki ne zadevajo kršitev
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(9), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 207(4) v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
A moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions (‘e-commerce moratorium’) to the effect that WTO members are to continue their current practice of not imposing customs duties on electronic transmissions was adopted in the form of a declaration at the 1998 Ministerial conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Moratorij na carine za elektronske prenose („moratorij na elektronsko trgovanje“), ki določa, da članice STO nadaljujejo svojo sedanjo prakso, pri kateri ne uvedejo carin za elektronske prenose, je bil leta 1998 sprejet v obliki izjave ministrske konference Svetovne trgovinske organizacije („STO“).
Currently the moratorium takes the form of a WTO Ministerial Conference decision, which has been renewed every two years since 1998.
Trenutno se moratorij sprejema v obliki sklepa ministrske konference STO, ki je bil od leta 1998 obnovljen vsaki dve leti.
The moratorium was last extended at the WTO Ministerial Conference in December 2011 till 2013.
Moratorij je bil nazadnje podaljšan za obdobje do leta 2013 na ministrski konferenci STO decembra 2011.
No consensus on banning or allowing non-violation or situation complaints under the TRIPS Agreement has been possible up to now.
Soglasje o prepovedi ali dovoljevanju pritožb, ki ne zadevajo kršitev, v okviru Sporazuma TRIPS do sedaj še ni bilo mogoče.
The Declaration adopted at the WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong in 2005 states: ‘We take note of the work done by the Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights pursuant to paragraph 11.1 of the Doha Decision on Implementation-Related Issues and Concerns and paragraph 1.h of the Decision adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004, and direct it to continue its examination of the scope and modalities for complaints of the types provided for under subparagraphs 1(b) and 1(c) of Article XXIII of GATT 1994 and make recommendations to our next Session. It is agreed that, in the meantime, Members will not initiate such complaints under the TRIPS Agreement.’.
Izjava, sprejeta na ministrski konferenci STO leta 2005 v Hongkongu, se glasi: „Seznanjeni smo z delom Sveta za trgovinske vidike pravic intelektualne lastnine v skladu z odstavkom 11.1 sklepa iz Dohe o vprašanjih in zadevah, povezanih z izvajanjem, in odstavkom 1.h sklepa, ki ga je 1. avgusta 2004 sprejel Generalni svet, ter mu dajemo navodila, naj nadaljuje svojo preiskavo o področju uporabe in pravilih v zvezi z vrstami pritožb, kot so navedene v pododstavkih 1(b) in 1(c) člena XXIII GATT 1994, priporočila pa naj predloži na našem naslednjem zasedanju. Dogovorjeno je, da članice v okviru Sporazuma TRIPS medtem takih pritožb ne bodo sprožale.“
The procedure for the successive extensions of the moratorium on non-violation and situation complaints has so far been the adoption of a decision by the WTO Ministerial Conference following a recommendation from the Council for Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
Do sedaj je bilo zaporedno podaljšanje moratorija na pritožbe, ki ne zadevajo kršitev, izvedeno na podlagi odločitve ministrske konference STO na priporočilo Sveta o.
It is in the interest of the Union to give its support to the extension of the e-commerce moratorium and the moratorium on non-violation and situation complaints.
V interesu Unije je, da podpre podaljšanje moratorija na elektronsko trgovanje in moratorija na pritožbe, ki ne zadevajo kršitev.
It is appropriate, therefore, to establish the position to be taken by the Union within the Ministerial conference of the WTO concerning the extension of the e-commerce moratorium and the moratorium on non-violation and situation complaints,
Primerno je, da se oblikuje stališče, ki ga sprejme Unija v okviru ministrske konference STO glede podaljšanja moratorija na elektronsko trgovanje in moratorija na pritožbe, ki ne zadevajo kršitev –
The position of the Union within the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation shall be to support the extension until the next Ministerial conference of the WTO of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions (‘e-commerce moratorium’) and of the moratorium on non-violation and situation complaints, as set out in the following draft WTO decisions:
Stališče Unije v okviru ministrske konference Svetovne trgovinske organizacije je do naslednje ministrske konference STO podpreti podaljšanje moratorija na carine za elektronske prenose („moratorij na elektronsko trgovanje“) in moratorija na pritožbe, ki ne zadevajo kršitev, kot je določeno v osnutkih sklepov STO o:
TRIPS non-violation and situation complaints […],
pritožbah, ki ne zadevajo kršitev TRIPSa […],
e-commerce […].
elektronskem trgovanju […].
Council Decision 2013/729/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2013/729/SZVP
amending Decision 2013/34/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali)
o spremembi Sklepa 2013/34/SZVP o vojaški misiji Evropske unije, ki prispeva k usposabljanju malijskih oboroženih sil (EUTM Mali)
On 17 January 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/34/CFSP [1] establishing the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali).
Svet je 17. januarja 2013 sprejel Sklep 2013/34/SZVP [1] o ustanovitvi vojaške misije Evropske unije, ki prispeva k usposabljanju malijskih oboroženih sil (EUTM Mali).
On 18 February 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/87/CFSP [2] on the launch of EUTM Mali.
Svet je 18. februarja 2013 sprejel Sklep 2013/87/SZVP [2] o začetku EUTM Mali.
EUTM Mali should be provided with a project cell to manage projects in support of its objectives.
EUTM Mali bi bilo treba zagotoviti projektno enoto za upravljanje projektov v podporo ciljem misije.
Decision 2013/34/CFSP should be amended accordingly,
Sklep 2013/34/SZVP bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti –
In Decision 2013/34/CFSP the following Article is added:
V Sklep 2013/34/SZVP se vstavi naslednji člen:
Project cell
Projektna enota
EUTM Mali shall have a project cell for identifying and implementing projects.
EUTM Mali razpolaga s projektno enoto za opredeljevanje in izvajanje projektov.
The Mission shall, as appropriate, coordinate, facilitate, and provide advice on projects implemented by Member States and third States, under their responsibility, in areas related to the Mission's mandate and in support of its objectives.
Misija po potrebi poskrbi za usklajevanje, lažji potek in svetovanje v zvezi s projekti, ki jih izvajajo države članice in tretje države pod njihovo odgovornostjo na področjih, povezanih z mandatom misije, in v podporo njenim ciljem.
Subject to paragraph 3, the EU Mission Commander shall be authorised to seek recourse to financial contributions from the Member States or third States to implement projects identified as supplementing EUTM Mali's other actions in a consistent manner.
Ob upoštevanju odstavka 3 lahko poveljnik misije EU za izvajanje projektov, ki dosledno dopolnjujejo druge ukrepe EUTM Mali, zaprosi za finančne prispevke držav članic ali tretjih držav.
In such a case, the EU Mission Commander shall conclude an arrangement with those States, covering in particular the specific procedures for dealing with any complaint from third parties concerning damage caused as a result of acts or omissions by the EU Mission Commander in the use of the funds provided by those States.
V takšnem primeru poveljnik misije EU sklene dogovor z navedenimi državami, v katerem so urejeni zlasti posebni postopki za obravnavo pritožb tretjih oseb v zvezi s škodo, nastalo zaradi dejanj ali opustitev dejanj poveljnika misije EU pri uporabi sredstev, ki jih zagotovijo navedene države.
Under no circumstances shall the Union or the HR be held liable by contributing States as a result of acts or omissions by the EU Mission Commander in the use of funds from those States.
Prispevajoče države se zaradi dejanj ali opustitev dejanj poveljnika misije EU pri uporabi njihovih sredstev v nobenem primeru ne morejo sklicevati na odgovornost Unije ali VP.
The PSC shall agree on the acceptance of a financial contribution from third States to the project cell.’.
PVO se dogovori o sprejetju finančnih prispevkov tretjih držav za projektno enoto.“
Council Decision 2013/87/CFSP of 18 February 2013 on the launch of a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) (OJ L 46, 19.2.2013, p 27).
Sklep Sveta 2013/87/SZVP z dne 18. februarja 2013 o začetku vojaške misije Evropske unije, ki prispeva k usposabljanju malijskih oboroženih sil (EUTM Mali) (UL L 46, 19.2.2013, str. 27).
Council Decision 2013/730/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2013/730/SZVP
in support of SEESAC disarmament and arms control activities in South East Europe in the framework of the EU Strategy to Combat the Illicit Accumulation and Trafficking of SALW and their Ammunition
v podporo dejavnostim SEESAC za razorožitev in nadzor nad oborožitvijo v Jugovzhodni Evropi v okviru strategije EU za boj proti nedovoljenemu kopičenju osebnega in lahkega orožja in pripadajočega streliva
The consequences of the illicit manufacture, transfer and circulation of conventional weapons, including small arms and light weapons (hereinafter ‘SALW’), and their excessive accumulation and uncontrolled spread are central to four of these five challenges.
Posledice nedovoljene proizvodnje in prenosa konvencionalnega orožja ter prometa z njim, vključno z osebnim in lahkim orožjem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SALW - small arms and light weapons), ter njegovega pretiranega kopičenja in nenadzorovanega širjenja so osrednji problem štirih od teh petih izzivov.
They fuel insecurity in South East Europe, its neighbouring regions and many other parts of the world, exacerbating conflict and undermining post-conflict peace-building, thus posing a serious threat to peace and security.
To povečuje negotovost v Jugovzhodni Evropi, v njenih sosednjih regijah in številnih drugih območjih po svetu, zaostruje konflikte in spodkopava pokonfliktno gradnjo miru ter s tem resno ogroža mir in varnost.
On 15 and 16 December 2005, the European Council adopted the EU Strategy to combat the illicit accumulation and trafficking of SALW and their ammunition (hereinafter the ‘Strategy’), which sets the guidelines for Union action in the field of SALW.
Evropski svet je 15. in 16. decembra 2005 sprejel strategijo EU za boj proti nedovoljenemu kopičenju SALW in pripadajočega streliva ter trgovini z njim, s katero je določil smernice za ukrepanje Unije v zvezi s SALW.
The Strategy identifies the Balkans and South-East Europe as regions particularly affected by the excessive accumulation and spread of SALW.
V tej strategiji sta Balkan in Jugovzhodna Evropa opredeljena kot regija, kjer je prekomerno kopičenje in širjenje SALW še posebno velik problem.
It states that the Union will give priority attention to Central and Eastern Europe and underlines, with specific reference to the Balkans, that support for effective multilateralism as well as for relevant regional initiatives will provide an effective instrument for its implementation.
V njej je navedeno, da bo Unija posebno pozornost namenila Srednji in Vzhodni Evropi, ter s posebnim sklicevanjem na Balkan poudarjeno, da bo podpora učinkovitemu multilateralizmu in ustreznim regionalnim pobudam zagotovila učinkovit instrument za njeno izvajanje.
It also specifically promotes the need to participate in the efforts to reduce surplus stocks of SALW left over in Eastern Europe from the Cold War.
V tej strategiji se poleg tega posebej spodbuja potreba po sodelovanju v prizadevanjih, da se v Vzhodni Evropi zmanjšajo presežne zaloge SALW, ki izhajajo iz hladne vojne.
At the 2012 Second Review Conference on the UN Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in SALW in All Its Aspects (hereinafter ‘UN Programme of Action’), which was adopted on 20 July 2001, all UN Member States reaffirmed their commitment to prevent illicit trafficking in SALW and encouraged measures to further enhance the effective role that regional and sub-regional organisations can play in implementing the UN Programme of Action and the International Instrument to Enable States to Identify and Trace, in a Timely and Reliable Manner, Illicit Small Arms and Light Weapons (hereinafter the ‘International Tracing Instrument’).
Leta 2012 so vse države članice ZN na drugi konferenci za pregled Akcijskega programa ZN za preprečevanje vseh vidikov nezakonitega trgovanja z osebnim in lahkim orožjem, boj proti njim in njihovo izkoreninjenje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: akcijski program ZN), ki je bil sprejet 20. julija 2001, ponovno poudarile svojo zavezanost k preprečevanju nedovoljene trgovine s SALW ter se zavzele za ukrepe, s katerimi bi dodatno razširili učinkovito vlogo, ki jo lahko imajo regionalne in podregionalne organizacije pri izvajanju akcijskega programa ZN in mednarodnega instrumenta, ki bi državam omogočil pravočasno in zanesljivo prepoznavanje in izsleditev nedovoljenega osebnega in lahkega orožja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: mednarodni instrument za izsleditev).
The South-Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SEESAC), established in 2002 in Belgrade and functioning under the joint mandate of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Regional Cooperation Council (successor to the Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe) assists national and regional stakeholders to control and reduce the spread and misuse of SALW and ammunition, and thus contributes to enhanced stability, security and development in South-Eastern and Eastern Europe.
Center jugovzhodne in vzhodne Evrope za nadzor nad osebnim in lahkim orožjem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SEESAC), ki je bil leta 2002 ustanovljen v Beogradu in deluje pod skupnim mandatom Programa Združenih narodov za razvoj (UNDP) in Sveta za regionalno sodelovanje (naslednik Pakta stabilnosti za Jugovzhodno Evropo), pomaga nacionalnim in regionalnim zainteresiranim stranem pri nadzoru nad SALW ter strelivom in zmanjševanju njegovega širjenja in zlorabe ter s tem prispeva k večji stabilnosti, varnosti in razvoju v Jugovzhodni in Vzhodni Evropi.