natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A new Protocol to the Partnership Agreement was initialled on 10 May 2012 (‘the new Protocol’).
Novi protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: novi protokol) je bil parafiran 10. maja 2012.
The new Protocol grants EU vessels fishing opportunities in waters in which Madagascar exercises its sovereignty or jurisdiction as regards fishing.
Novi protokol za plovila EU določa ribolovne možnosti v vodah, v katerih Madagaskar izvaja svojo suverenost oziroma jurisdikcijo na področju ribištva.
On 28 November 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/826/EU [2] on the signing and provisional application of the new Protocol.
Svet je 28. novembra 2012 sprejel Sklep 2012/826/EU [2] o podpisu in začasni uporabi novega protokola.
The method for allocating the fishing opportunities among the Member States should be defined for the period in which the new Protocol applies.
Treba bi bilo opredeliti način dodeljevanja ribolovnih možnosti med države članice za obdobje uporabe novega protokola.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 of 29 September 2008 concerning authorisations for fishing activities of Community fishing vessels outside Community waters and the access of third country vessels to Community waters [3] provides that if it appears that the fishing authorisations or the fishing opportunities allocated to the Union under the new Protocol are not fully utilised, the Commission will inform the Member States concerned.
Če se izkaže, da dovoljenja za ribolov ali ribolovne možnosti, ki so bile dodeljene Uniji v skladu z novim protokolom, niso v celoti izkoriščene, Komisija v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1006/2008 z dne 29. septembra 2008 o dovoljenjih za ribolovne dejavnosti ribiških plovil Skupnosti zunaj voda Skupnosti in dostopu plovil tretjih držav do voda Skupnosti [3] o tem obvesti zadevne države članice.
The absence of a reply within a time limit to be set by the Council is to be considered as confirmation that the vessels of the Member State concerned are not making full use of their fishing opportunities in the given period.
Če ni odgovora v roku, ki ga določi Svet, to pomeni potrditev, da plovila zadevne države članice v danem obdobju niso v celoti izkoristila svojih ribolovnih možnosti.
That time limit should be set.
Treba bi bilo določiti navedeni rok.
Given that the Protocol is to be provisionally applied from the date of its signature and from 1 January 2013 at the earliest, this Regulation should apply from the date so determined,
Ker je predvideno, da se Protokol začasno uporablja od datuma njegovega podpisa, vendar ne pred 1. januarjem 2013, bi bilo treba to uredbo uporabljati od tako določenega datuma –
The fishing opportunities fixed under the Protocol agreed between the European Union and the Republic of Madagascar setting out fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the two parties currently in force (‘the Protocol’) shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:
Ribolovne možnosti, določene s Protokolom, o katerem sta se dogovorili Evropska unija in Republika Madagaskar ter ki določa ribolovne možnosti in finančni prispevek iz Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju, ki se uporablja med pogodbenicama (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol), se državam članicam dodelijo na naslednji način: Vrsta plovila
Member State
Vrsta plovila
Surface longliners over 100 GT
Plovila s površinskimi parangali z nosilnostjo nad 100 BT
Surface longliners of 100 GT or below
Plovila s površinskimi parangali z nosilnostjo do vključno 100 BT
Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 shall apply without prejudice to the Partnership Agreement.
Uredba (ES) št. 1006/2008 se uporablja brez poseganja v Sporazum o partnerstvu.
If applications for fishing authorisations from the Member States referred to in paragraph 1 do not exhaust the fishing opportunities set out in the Protocol, the Commission shall consider applications for fishing authorisations from any other Member State, pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008.
Če zahtevki za dovoljenja za ribolov držav članic iz odstavka 1 ne izčrpajo vseh ribolovnih možnosti, ki jih določa Protokol, Komisija v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1006/2008 upošteva zahtevke za dovoljenja za ribolov katere koli druge države članice.
The time limit within which the Member States must confirm that they are not making full use of the fishing opportunities granted to them, as provided by Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008, is set at 10 working days as from the date on which the Commission informs them that the fishing opportunities are not fully utilised.
Države članice morajo potrditi v roku desetih delovnih dni od dneva, ko jih Komisija obvesti o tem, da ribolovne možnosti niso v celoti izkoriščene, da dodeljene ribolovne možnosti iz člena 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1006/2008, niso v celoti izkoriščene.
It shall apply from the date of the signature of the Protocol and at the earliest from 1 January 2013.
Uporablja se od datuma podpisa protokola, vendar ne pred 1. januarjem 2013.
OJ L 15, 18.1.2008, p. 1.
UL L 15, 18.1.2008, str. 1.
Fishing opportunities Tuna seiners
Plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalkami
Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2012
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1259/2012
on the allocation of the fishing opportunities under the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for a period of two years, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1801/2006
o dodelitvi ribolovnih možnosti v skladu s Protokolom, ki določa ribolovne možnosti in finančni prispevek iz Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju za dve leti, in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1801/2006
On 30 November 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1801/2006 on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania [1] (‘the Partnership Agreement’).
Svet je 30. novembra 2006 sprejel Uredbo (ES) št. 1801/2006 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o partnerstvu).
A new Protocol to the Partnership Agreement was initialled on 26 July 2012 (‘the new Protocol’).
26. julija 2012 je bil parafiran novi protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: novi protokol).
The new Protocol grants EU vessels fishing opportunities in waters in which Mauritania exercises its sovereignty or its jurisdiction as regards fishing.
Novi protokol določa ribolovne možnosti za plovila EU v vodah, v katerih Mavretanija na področju ribištva izvaja svojo suverenost oziroma svojo jurisdikcijo.
On 18 December 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/827/EU [2] on the signing and provisional application of the new Protocol.
Svet je 18. decembra 2012 sprejel Sklep 2012/827/EU [2] o podpisu in začasni uporabi novega protokola.
The method for allocating the fishing opportunities among the Member States should be defined for the period in which the new Protocol applies.
Treba bi bilo določiti način razdelitve ribolovnih možnosti med države članice za obdobje uporabe novega protokola.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008 of 29 September 2008 concerning authorisations for fishing activities of Community fishing vessels outside Community waters and the access of third country vessels to Community waters [3] provides that if it appears that the fishing authorisations or the fishing opportunities allocated to the Union under the new Protocol are not fully utilised, the Commission will inform the Member States concerned.
Če je očitno, da dovoljenja za ribolov ali ribolovne možnosti, ki so bile Uniji dodeljene na podlagi novega protokola, niso v celoti izkoriščene, Komisija v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1006/2008 z dne 29. septembra 2008 o dovoljenjih za ribolovne dejavnosti ribiških plovil Skupnosti zunaj voda Skupnosti in dostopu plovil tretjih držav do voda Skupnosti [3] o tem obvesti zadevne države članice.
The absence of a reply within a time limit to be set by the Council is to be considered as confirmation that the vessels of the Member State concerned are not making full use of their fishing opportunities in the given period.
Če v roku, ki ga določi Svet, ni odgovora, to pomeni potrditev, da plovila zadevne države članice v zadevnem obdobju v celoti ne izkoriščajo svojih ribolovnih možnosti.
That time limit should be set.
Ta rok bi bilo treba določiti.
The fishing opportunities fixed under the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for a period of two years (‘the Protocol’) shall take into consideration the catches made between 2008 and 2012 and shall be allocated among the Member States as follows:
Pri ribolovnih možnostih, določenih s Protokolom, ki določa ribolovne možnosti in finančni prispevek iz Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju za dve leti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol), se upošteva ulov med letoma 2008 in 2012, med države članice pa se razdelijo na naslednji način:
Category 1 — Fishing vessels specialising in crustaceans other than spiny lobster and crab (maximum number of vessels: 36)
Kategorija 1 – Plovila za lov na rake, razen rarogov in rakovic (največje dovoljeno število plovil: 36)
Spain 4150 tonnes
Španija 4150 ton
Italy 600 tonnes
Italija 600 ton
Portugal 250 tonnes
Portugalska 250 ton
Category 2 — Black hake (non-freezer) trawlers and bottom longliners (maximum number of vessels: 11)
Kategorija 2 – Plovila z vlečno mrežo (nezamrzovalna) in plovila s pridnenimi parangali za ribolov senegalskega osliča (največje dovoljeno število plovil: 11)
Spain 4000 tonnes
Španija 4000 ton
Category 3 — Vessels fishing for demersal species other than black hake with gear other than trawls (maximum number of vessels: 9)
Kategorija 3 – Plovila za ribolov pridnenih vrst, razen senegalskega osliča, z orodji, ki niso vlečne mreže (največje dovoljeno število plovil: 9)
Spain 2500 tonnes
Španija 2500 ton
Category 4 — Vessels fishing for crab
Kategorija 4 – Plovila za lov na rakovice
Spain 200 tonnes
Španija 200 ton
Category 5 — Tuna seiners
Kategorija 5 – Plovila za ribolov tunov s potegalkami
Spain 17 licences
Španija 17 dovoljenj
France 5 licences
Francija 5 dovoljenj
Category 6 — Pole-and-line tuna vessels and surface longliners
Kategorija 6 – Plovila za ribolov tunov z ribiškimi palicami in plovila s površinskimi parangali
Spain 18 licences
Španija 18 dovoljenj
France 4 licences
Francija 4 dovoljenja
Category 7 — Pelagic freezer trawlers:
Kategorija 7 – Zamrzovalna plovila z vlečno mrežo za pelagični ribolov
Germany 15396 tonnes
Nemčija 15396 ton
France 3205 tonnes
Francija 3205 ton
Latvia 66087 tonnes
Latvija 66087 ton
Netherlands 76727 tonnes
Nizozemska 76727 ton
Poland 32008 tonnes
Poljska 32008 ton
United Kingdom 10457 tonnes
Združeno kraljestvo 10457 ton
Ireland 10462 tonnes
Irska 10462 ton
At any one time a maximum of 19 vessels may be deployed in Mauritanian waters.
V kakršnem koli trenutku je lahko v mavretanskih vodah prisotnih največ devetnajst plovil.
In case of non-utilisation of licences in category 8, a maximum of 16 quarterly licences may be added from category 8.
V primeru, da dovoljenja iz kategorije 8 niso izkoriščena, se lahko doda največ šestnajst četrtletnih dovoljenj iz kategorije 8.
During the two years validity of the Protocol, the following number of quarterly licences shall be held by Member States:
V dveh letih veljavnosti Protokola države članice razpolagajo z naslednjim številom četrtletnih dovoljenj:
Germany 8
Nemčija 8
France 4
Francija 4
Latvia 40
Latvija 40
Netherlands 32
Nizozemska 32
Poland 16
Poljska 16
Ireland 4
Irska 4
United Kingdom 4
Združeno kraljestvo 4
Member States shall endeavour to communicate to the Commission if certain licences may be at the disposal of other Member States.
Države članice si prizadevajo obvestiti Komisijo, če so določena dovoljenja morebiti na voljo drugim državam članicam.
Category 8 — Non-freezer pelagic vessels:
Kategorija 8 – Plovila za pelagični ribolov, namenjen prodaji svežih rib
Ireland 15000 tonnes
Irska 15000 ton
These fishing opportunities may, in the case of non-utilisation, be transferred to category 7 according to the method of allocation of that category.
Te ribolovne možnosti se, če se ne izkoristijo, lahko prenesejo v kategorijo 7 po razdelitvenem ključu za to kategorijo.
A maximum of 16 quarterly licences may be deployed in Mauritanian waters.
V mavretanskih vodah je lahko dodeljenih največ šestnajst četrtletnih dovoljenj.
In case of non-utilisation, these licences may be transferred to category 7.
V primeru, da dovoljenja niso izkoriščena, se lahko ta dovoljenja prenese v kategorijo 7.
Ireland shall hold 16 quarterly licences (with a possible transfer to category 7 if not utilised).
Irska razpolaga s šestnajstimi četrtletnimi dovoljenji (z morebitnim prenosom v kategorijo 7, če niso izkoriščena).
Ireland shall communicate to the Commission, by 1 July of every year of the validity of the Protocol at the latest, whether fishing opportunities may become available for other Member States.
Irska najpozneje do 1. julija vsakega leta veljavnosti Protokola obvesti Komisijo, če so ribolovne možnosti morebiti postale razpoložljive za druge države članice.
If applications for fishing authorisations from the Member States referred to in paragraph 1 do not exhaust the fishing opportunities set out in the Protocol, the Commission shall consider applications for fishing authorisations from any other Member State, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008.
Če zahtevki za dovoljenja za ribolov držav članic iz odstavka 1 ne izčrpajo vseh ribolovnih možnosti, ki jih določa Protokol, Komisija v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1006/2008 upošteva zahtevke za dovoljenja za ribolov katere koli druge države članice.
The time limit within which the Member States must confirm that they are not making full use of the fishing opportunities granted to them, as provided by Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1006/2008, shall be set at ten working days as from the date on which the Commission informs them that the fishing opportunities are not fully utilised.
Rok, v katerem morajo države članice v skladu s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1006/2008 potrditi, da ne izkoriščajo v celoti ribolovnih možnosti, dodeljenih s Sporazumom, je deset delovnih dni od dneva, ko jim Komisija sporoči, da ribolovne možnosti niso v celoti izkoriščene.
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1801/2006 is repealed.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1801/2006 se razveljavi.
It shall apply from the date of the signature of the Protocol.
Uporablja se od dneva podpisa Protokola.
The current Protocol expired on 31 July 2012.
Sedanji protokol je prenehal veljati 31. julija 2012.
The new Protocol should be applied provisionally from the date of its signature, therefore this Regulation should apply from the same date,
Novi protokol bi se moral začasno uporabljati od dneva njegovega podpisa, zato bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati od istega datuma –
Council Regulation (EU) No 1260/2012
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1260/2012
implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements
o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva v zvezi z veljavno ureditvijo prevajanja
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 118 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti drugega odstavka člena 118 Pogodbe,
Pursuant to Decision 2011/167/EU, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom (hereinafter "participating Member States") were authorised to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
V skladu s Sklepom 2011/167/EU so bile Belgija, Bolgarija, Češka republika, Danska, Nemčija, Estonija, Irska, Grčija, Francija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Nizozemska, Avstrija, Poljska, Portugalska, Romunija, Slovenija, Slovaška, Finska, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodelujoče države članice) pooblaščene, da med seboj vzpostavijo okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva.
Under Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection [2], certain European patents granted by the European Patent Office (hereinafter ‘EPO’) under the rules and procedures of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973, as revised on 17 December 1991 and on 29 November 2000 (hereinafter ‘EPC’) should, at the request of the patent proprietor, benefit from unitary effect in the participating Member States.
V skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1257/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2012 o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva [2] imajo lahko nekateri evropski patenti, ki jih podeli Evropski patentni urad (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EPU) v skladu s pravili in postopki iz Konvencije o podeljevanju evropskih patentov z dne 5. oktobra 1973, kakor je bila revidirana 17. decembra 1991 in 29. novembra 2000 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EPK), na zahtevo imetnika patenta enotni učinek v sodelujočih državah članicah.
Translation arrangements for European patents benefiting from unitary effect in the participating Member States (hereinafter ‘European patent with unitary effect’) should be established by means of a separate Regulation, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Ureditev prevajanja za evropske patente, ki imajo enotni učinek v sodelujočih državah članicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: evropski patent z enotnim učinkom) bi bilo treba urediti z ločeno uredbo v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 118 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
In accordance with Decision 2011/167/EU the translation arrangements for European patents with unitary effect should be simple and cost-effective.
V skladu s Sklepom 2011/167/EU bi morala biti ureditev prevajanja za evropske patente z enotnim učinkom poenostavljena in stroškovno učinkovita.
They should correspond to those provided for in the proposal for a Council Regulation on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent, presented by the Commission on 30 June 2010, combined with the elements of compromise proposed by the Presidency in November 2010 that had wide support in the Council.
Ustrezati bi morala ureditvi iz predloga uredbe Sveta o ureditvi prevajanja za patent Evropske unije, ki ga je Komisija predložila 30. junija 2010, skupaj z elementi kompromisa, ki ga je predlagalo predsedstvo novembra 2010 in je v Svetu prejel veliko podpore.
Such translation arrangements should ensure legal certainty and stimulate innovation and should, in particular, benefit small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Takšna ureditev prevajanja bi morala zagotoviti pravno varnost in spodbujati inovacije ter koristiti zlasti malim in srednje velikim podjetjem (MSP).
They should make access to the European patent with unitary effect and to the patent system as a whole easier, less costly and legally secure.
Zagotoviti bi morala lažji, cenejši in pravno varnejši dostop do evropskega patenta z enotnim učinkom ter celotnega patentnega sistema.
Since the EPO is responsible for the grant of European patents, the translation arrangements for the European patent with unitary effect should be built on the current procedure in the EPO.
Ker je EPU pristojen za podelitev evropskih patentov, bi morala ureditev prevajanja za evropski patent z enotnim učinkom temeljiti na trenutnem postopku pri EPU.
Those arrangements should aim to achieve the necessary balance between the interests of economic operators and the public interest, in terms of the cost of proceedings and the availability of technical information.
Cilj te ureditve bi moral biti doseganje potrebnega ravnovesja med interesi gospodarskih subjektov in javnim interesom, kar zadeva stroške postopka in razpoložljivost tehničnih informacij.
Without prejudice to the transitional arrangements, where the specification of a European patent with unitary effect has been published in accordance with Article 14(6) of the EPC, no further translations should be required.
Brez poseganja v prehodne ureditve prevajanja se ne smejo zahtevati dodatni prevodi, kadar je spis evropskega patenta z enotnim učinkom objavljen v skladu s členom 14(6) EPK.
Article 14(6) of the EPC provides that the specification of a European patent is published in the language of the proceedings before the EPO and includes a translation of the claims into the other two official languages of the EPO.
Člen 14(6) EPK določa, da se evropski patentni spis objavi v jeziku postopka pred EPU in vsebuje prevod patentnih zahtevkov v druga dva uradna jezika EPU.
In the event of a dispute concerning a European patent with unitary effect, it is a legitimate requirement that the patent proprietor at the request of the alleged infringer should provide a full translation of the patent into an official language of either the participating Member State in which the alleged infringement took place or the Member State in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
V primeru spora v zvezi z evropskim patentom z enotnim učinkom, se smatra kot legitimna zahteva, da bi moral imetnik patenta na zahtevo domnevnega kršitelja zagotoviti celoten prevod patenta v uradni jezik sodelujoče države članice, v kateri se je zgodila domnevna kršitev ali države članice v kateri ima domnevni kršitelj bivališče.
The patent proprietor should also be required to provide, at the request of a court competent in the participating Member States for disputes concerning the European patent with unitary effect, a full translation of the patent into the language used in the proceedings of that court.
Imetnik patenta bi moral na zahtevo sodišča, pristojnega za spore o evropskem patentu z enotnim učinkom v sodelujočih državah članicah, zagotoviti tudi celoten prevod patenta v jezik, ki se uporablja v postopku pred navedenima sodiščem.
Such translations should not be carried out by automated means and should be provided at the expense of the patent proprietor.
Ti prevodi ne bi smeli biti opravljeni avtomatizirano, njihove stroške pa bi moral kriti imetnik patenta.
In the event of a dispute concerning a claim for damages, the court hearing the dispute should take into consideration the fact that, before having been provided with a translation in his own language, the alleged infringer may have acted in good faith and may have not known or had reasonable grounds to know that he was infringing the patent.
V primeru spora o odškodninskem zahtevku bi moralo sodišče, ki obravnava spor, upoštevati dejstvo, da je domnevni kršitelj, preden je prejel prevod v njegov jezik, morda ravnal v dobri veri in ni vedel ali upravičeno ni mogel vedeti, da krši patent.
The competent court should assess the circumstances of the individual case and, inter alia, should take into account whether the alleged infringer is a SME operating only at local level, the language of the proceedings before the EPO and, during the transitional period, the translation submitted together with the request for unitary effect.
Pristojno sodišče bi moralo oceniti okoliščine posameznega primera ter bi moralo med drugim upoštevati ali je domnevni kršitelj MSP, ki posluje le na lokalni ravni, jezik postopka pred EPU in v prehodnem obdobju prevod, predložen skupaj z zahtevkom za enotni učinek.