natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards the presentation of chemical status under Section 1.4.3 of Annex V to Directive 2000/60/EC, Member States should be allowed to present separately the impact on chemical status of substances that behave like ubiquitous PBTs so that improvements in water quality achieved in relation to other substances are not obscured.
Pri prikazu kemijskega stanja v skladu z oddelkom 1.4.3 Priloge V k Direktivi 2000/60/ES bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da ločeno prikažejo vpliv snovi, ki se obnašajo kot splošno prisotne PBT, na kemijsko stanje, da se jasno prikaže izboljšanje kakovosti vode, ki je bilo doseženo pri drugih snoveh.
In addition to the obligatory map covering all substances, additional maps, covering substances behaving like ubiquitous PBTs and separately covering the rest of the substances, could be provided.
Poleg obvezne karte, v kateri so zajete vse snovi, se lahko predložita dodatni karti, ki zajemata snovi, ki se obnašajo kot splošno prisotne PBT, in ločeno zajemata ostale snovi.
Monitoring should be adapted to the spatial and temporal scale of the expected variation in concentrations.
Spremljanje bi bilo treba prilagoditi razširjenosti in časovnemu trajanju pričakovanih sprememb koncentracij.
Given the widespread distribution and long recovery times expected for substances behaving like ubiquitous PBTs, Member States should be allowed to reduce the number of monitoring sites and/or the frequency of monitoring for those substances to the minimum level sufficient for reliable long-term trend analysis, provided that a statistically robust monitoring baseline is available.
Glede na veliko razširjenost in dolgotrajno regeneracijo, pričakovano za snovi, ki se obnašajo kot splošno prisotne PBT, bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti, da zmanjšajo število merilnih mest za spremljanje in/ali pogostost spremljanja teh snovi na minimalno raven, ki zadošča za zanesljivo dolgoročno analizo trenda koncentracij, pod pogojem, da je na voljo statistično trdno izhodišče za spremljanje.
The special consideration given to substances behaving like ubiquitous PBTs does not exempt the Union or the Member States from taking measures additional to those already taken, including at international level, to reduce or eliminate discharges, emissions and losses of those substances so as to achieve the objectives set out in point (a) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Posebna obravnava snovi, ki se obnašajo kot splošno prisotne PBT, ne pomeni, da so Unija ali države članice oproščene obveznosti, da poleg že sprejetih ukrepov za zmanjšanje ali odpravo odvajanja, emisij in uhajanja teh snovi, vključno s tistimi na mednarodni ravni, sprejmejo dodatne ukrepe, da se dosežejo cilji iz točke (a) člena 4(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
Under Article 10(3) of Directive 2000/60/EC, where a quality objective or quality standard established pursuant to that Directive, to the Directives listed in Annex IX to Directive 2000/60/EC, or pursuant to any other Union legislation, requires stricter conditions than those which would result from the application of Article 10(2) of that Directive, more stringent emission controls are to be set accordingly.
Po členu 10(3) Direktive 2000/60/ES se, kadar cilj kakovosti ali standard kakovosti, določen na podlagi navedene direktive, direktiv iz Priloge IX k Direktivi 2000/60/ES ali katere koli druge zakonodaje Unije, predpisuje strožje pogoje od tistih, ki bi izhajali iz uporabe člena 10(2) navedene direktive, ustrezno določi strožji nadzor nad emisijami.
A similar provision has also been included in Article 18 of Directive 2010/75/EU.
Podobna določba je tudi v členu 18 Direktive 2010/75/EU.
It follows from those Articles that the emission controls set under the legislation listed in Article 10(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC should be the minimum controls applied.
Iz teh členov izhaja, da bi moral nadzor nad emisijami, določen z zakonodajo, našteto v členu 10(2) Direktive 2000/60/ES, veljati za minimalni nadzor.
Where those controls cannot ensure that an EQS is met, for example in the case of a substance behaving like a ubiquitous PBT, but stricter conditions would not either, even in conjunction with stricter conditions for other discharges, emissions and losses affecting the water body, such stricter conditions could not be considered as being required to meet that EQS.
Kadar tak nadzor ne more zagotoviti, da se doseže OSK, na primer za snovi, ki se obnašajo kot splošno prisotne PBT, vendar tega ne bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti niti s strožjimi pogoji, celo v povezavi s strožjimi pogoji za druga odvajanja, emisije in uhajanja, ki prizadenejo vodno telo, se za take strožje pogoje ne bi smelo šteti, da so potrebni za doseganje tega OSK.
High-quality monitoring data, along with data on ecotoxicological and toxicological effects, are needed for the risk assessments that support the selection of new priority substances.
Za ocene tveganj, na podlagi katerih se izberejo nove prednostne snovi, so poleg podatkov o ekotoksikoloških in toksikoloških učinkih potrebni visokokakovostni podatki o spremljanju.
The monitoring data collected from Member States, although significantly improved over the past years, are not always fit for purpose in terms of quality and Union coverage.
Čeprav so se podatki o spremljanju v državah članicah v preteklih letih bistveno izboljšali, niso vedno dovolj kakovosti ali reprezentativni na ravni Unije.
Monitoring data are particularly lacking for many emerging pollutants, which can be defined as pollutants currently not included in routine monitoring programmes at Union level but which could pose a significant risk requiring regulation, depending upon their potential ecotoxicological and toxicological effects and on their levels in the aquatic environment.
S spremljanjem zlasti ni pridobljenih dovolj podatkov za številna nova onesnaževala, ki jih je mogoče opredeliti kot onesnaževala, ki zdaj niso vključena v redne programe spremljanja na ravni Unije, vendar lahko pomenijo znatno tveganje, ki bi ga bilo treba zakonsko urediti, odvisno od njihovih potencialnih ekotoksikoloških in toksikoloških vplivov ter ravni v vodnem okolju.
A new mechanism is needed to provide the Commission with targeted high-quality monitoring information on the concentration of substances in the aquatic environment, with a focus on emerging pollutants and substances for which available monitoring data are of insufficient quality for the purpose of risk assessment.
Potreben je nov mehanizem, da se Komisiji zagotovijo ciljno usmerjeni visokokakovostni podatki o spremljanju glede koncentracije snovi v vodnem okolju, pri čemer bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti novim onesnaževalom in snovem, za katere razpoložljivi podatki o spremljanju niso dovolj kakovostni za oceno tveganja.
The new mechanism should facilitate the gathering of that information across Union river basins and complement monitoring data from programmes under Articles 5 and 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC and other reliable sources.
Novi mehanizem bi moral olajšati zbiranje teh informacij v povodjih Unije ter dopolnjevati podatke o spremljanju v okviru programov iz členov 5 in 8 Direktive 2000/60/ES in podatke iz drugih zanesljivih virov.
In order to maintain monitoring costs at reasonable levels, the mechanism should focus on a limited number of substances, included temporarily in a watch list, and a limited number of monitoring sites, but should provide representative data that are fit for the purpose of the Union prioritisation process.
Da bi stroški spremljanja ostali na razumni ravni, bi moral biti mehanizem usmerjen na omejeno število snovi, ki so začasno uvrščene na nadzorni seznam, omejeno pa bi moralo biti tudi število merilnih mest, vendar bi moral zagotavljati reprezentativne podatke, ki so ustrezni za prednostno razvrščanje, ki ga izvaja Unija.
The list should be dynamic and its validity in time should be limited, in order to respond to new information on the potential risks posed by emerging pollutants and to avoid monitoring substances for longer than necessary.
Seznam bi moral biti dinamičen, njegova časovna veljavnost pa omejena, da bi ga lahko spreminjali na podlagi novih informacij o potencialnih tveganjih zaradi novih onesnaževal in da spremljanje snovi ne bi trajalo dlje, kot je dejansko potrebno.
In order to simplify and streamline reporting obligations for the Member States, and increase coherence with other related aspects of water management, the notification requirements in Article 3 of Directive 2008/105/EC should be merged with the overall reporting obligations under Article 15 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Da bi se poenostavile in racionalizirale obveznosti poročanja za države članice ter povečala skladnost z drugimi sorodnimi vidiki upravljanja voda, bi bilo treba zahteve glede obveščanja iz člena 3 Direktive 2008/105/ES združiti s splošnimi obveznostmi poročanja iz člena 15 Direktive 2000/60/ES.
As regards the presentation of chemical status in accordance with Section 1.4.3 of Annex V to Directive 2000/60/EC, for the purposes of the update of the programmes of measures and of the river basin management plans to be carried out in accordance with Article 11(8) and Article 13(7) of Directive 2000/60/EC respectively, Member States should be allowed to present separately the impact on chemical status of newly identified priority substances and of existing priority substances with revised EQS, so that the introduction of new requirements is not mistakenly perceived as an indication that the chemical status of surface waters has deteriorated.
Pri prikazu kemijskega stanja v skladu z oddelkom 1.4.3 Priloge V k Direktivi 2000/60/ES za namene posodobitve programov ukrepov in načrtov za upravljanje povodij, ki se izvajajo v skladu s členom 11(8) oziroma členom 13(7) Direktive 2000/60/ES, bi moralo biti državam članicam dovoljeno, da ločeno prikažejo vpliv novo opredeljenih prednostnih snovi in obstoječih prednostnih snovi s pregledanimi OSK na kemijsko stanje, da uvedba novih zahtev ne povzroči napačnega razumevanja, da je prišlo do poslabšanja kemijskega stanja površinskih voda.
In addition to the obligatory map covering all substances, additional maps, covering newly identified substances and existing substances with revised EQS, and separately covering the rest of the substances, could be provided.
Poleg obvezne karte, v kateri so zajete vse snovi, se lahko predložita dodatni karti, ki zajemata novo določene snovi in obstoječe snovi s pregledanimi OSK ter ločeno ostale snovi.
It is important that environmental information on the status of Union surface waters and on the achievements of strategies against chemical pollution is made available to the public in a timely manner.
Pomembno je, da se javnost pravočasno obvesti o okoljskem stanju površinskih voda Unije in dosežkih strategij proti kemičnemu onesnaževanju.
With a view to strengthening access and transparency, a central portal providing information on the river basin management plans and their reviews and updates should be accessible to the public electronically in each Member State.
Da bi okrepili dostop in preglednost, bi bilo treba v vsaki državi članici vzpostaviti osrednji portal, ki javnosti daje na voljo elektronsko dostopne informacije o načrtih za upravljanje povodij ter njihovih pregledih in posodobitvah.
With the adoption of this proposal and submission of its report to the European Parliament and to the Council, the Commission has completed its first review of the list of priority substances as required under Article 8 of Directive 2008/105/EC.
S sprejetjem tega predloga in predložitvijo poročila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu je Komisija zaključila prvi pregled seznama prednostnih snovi, kot to zahteva člen 8 Direktive 2008/105/ES.
This has included a review of the substances listed in Annex III to that Directive, some of which have been identified for prioritisation.
Ta vključuje pregled snovi iz Priloge III k navedeni direktivi, pri čemer so bile nekatere med njimi določene za prednostno razvrstitev.
There is currently insufficient evidence to prioritise the other substances listed in Annex III.
Za prednostno razvrstitev ostalih snoveh, navedenih v Prilogi III, za zdaj ni zadostnih dokazov.
The possibility of new information regarding those substances becoming available means that they are not excluded from future review, as is the case for the other substances considered but not prioritised in the present review.
Ker obstaja možnost, da se pojavijo nove informacije o teh snoveh, to pomeni, da niso izključene iz nadaljnjega pregleda, tako kot snovi, ki so v sedanjem pregledu obravnavane, vendar niso prednostno razvrščene.
Annex III to Directive 2008/105/EC has therefore become obsolete and should be deleted.
Priloga III k Direktivi 2008/105/ES je s tem postala brezpredmetna in bi jo bilo treba črtati.
Article 8 of that Directive should be amended accordingly, also regarding the date of reporting to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Člen 8 navedene direktive bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti, tudi glede datuma poročanja Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
In order to react to relevant technical and scientific progress in the area covered by this Directive in a timely manner, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the updating of the methods for applying the EQS laid down in the Directive.
Zaradi pravočasnega upoštevanja ustreznega tehničnega in znanstvenega napredka na področju, ki ga zajema ta direktiva, bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme delegirane akte v zvezi s posodobitvijo metod za uporabo OSK iz te direktive.
In order to improve the information basis for future identification of priority substances, in particular as regards emerging pollutants, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of the establishment and updating of a watch list.
Za izboljšanje informacijske podlage za določitev prednostnih snovi v prihodnosti, zlasti glede novih onesnaževal, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila za pripravo in posodabljanje nadzornega seznama.
Furthermore, in order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive and for the formats for the reporting to the Commission of the monitoring data and information, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Poleg tega bi bilo za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev za izvajanje te direktive in za oblike poročanja Komisiji o podatkih in informacijah o spremljanju treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers [15].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije [15].
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents [16], Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
Države članice so se v skladu s skupno politično izjavo držav članic in Komisije z dne 28. septembra 2011 o obrazložitvenih dokumentih [16] zavezale, da bodo v upravičenih primerih obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile enega ali več dokumentov, ki bodo pojasnjevali razmerje med elementi direktive in ustreznimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
With regard to this Directive, the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified.
Zakonodajalec meni, da je predložitev takšnih dokumentov pri tej direktivi upravičena.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely that of achieving good surface water chemical status by laying down EQS for priority substances and certain other pollutants, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the need to maintain the same level of protection of surface water throughout the Union, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer doseganja dobrega kemijskega stanja površinskih voda z določitvijo OSK za prednostne snovi in nekatera druga onesnaževala, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj zaradi potrebe po ohranitvi enake ravni varstva površinskih voda po vsej Uniji laže doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, ki je potreben za doseganje navedenega cilja.
Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Direktivi 2000/60/ES in 2008/105/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Directive 2000/60/EC is amended as follows:
Direktiva 2000/60/ES se spremeni:
Article 16(4) is replaced by the following:
člen 16(4) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The Commission shall review the adopted list of priority substances at the latest four years after the date of entry into force of this Directive and at least every six years thereafter, and come forward with proposals as appropriate.’;
Komisija pregleda sprejeti seznam prednostnih snovi najpozneje štiri leta po začetku veljavnosti te direktive in potem vsaj vsakih šest let ter po potrebi poda predloge.“;
Annex X is replaced by the text set out in Annex I to this Directive.
Priloga X se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge I k tej direktivi.
Directive 2008/105/EC is amended as follows:
Direktiva 2008/105/ES se spremeni:
For the purposes of this Directive, the definitions laid down in Article 2 of Directive 2000/60/EC and in Article 2 of Commission Directive 2009/90/EC of 31 July 2009 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, technical specifications for chemical analysis and monitoring of water status shall apply.
V tej direktivi se uporabljajo opredelitve pojmov iz člena 2 Direktive 2000/60/ES in člena 2 Direktive Komisije 2009/90/ES z dne 31. julija 2009 o določitvi strokovnih zahtev za kemijsko analiziranje in spremljanje stanja voda v skladu z Direktivo 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
In addition, the following definitions shall apply:
Poleg tega se uporabljata naslednji opredelitvi pojmov:
“matrix” means a compartment of the aquatic environment, namely water, sediment or biota;
‚medij‘ pomeni del vodnega okolja, in sicer vodo, usedlino ali organizem;
“biota taxon” means a particular aquatic taxon within the taxonomic rank “sub-phylum”, “class” or their equivalent.
‚takson‘ pomeni posamezni vodni takson na taksonomski ravni ‚poddeblo‘, ‚razred‘ ali drugi ustrezni ravni.
Without prejudice to paragraph 1a, Member States shall apply the EQS laid down in Part A of Annex I for bodies of surface water, and shall apply those EQS in accordance with the requirements laid down in Part B of Annex I.
Države članice brez poseganja v odstavek 1a za vodna telesa površinske vode uporabljajo OSK iz dela A Priloge I, in sicer v skladu z zahtevami, določenimi v delu B Priloge I.
Without prejudice to the obligations arising under this Directive in the version in force on 13 January 2009 and in particular the achievement of good surface water chemical status in relation to the substances and the EQS listed therein, Member States shall implement the EQS laid down in Part A of Annex I as regards:
Brez poseganja v obveznosti iz različice te direktive, veljavne na dan 13. januarja 2009, in zlasti v doseganje dobrega kemijskega stanja površinskih voda v zvezi s snovmi in OSK, navedenimi v direktivi, države članice uporabljajo OSK, določene v delu A Priloge I, glede:
the substances numbered 2, 5, 15, 20, 22, 23, 28 in Part A of Annex I, for which revised EQS are set, with effect from 22 December 2015, with the aim of achieving good surface water chemical status in relation to those substances by 22 December 2021 by means of programmes of measures included in the 2015 river basin management plans produced in accordance with Article 13(7) of Directive 2000/60/EC; and
snovi pod številkami 2, 5, 15, 20, 22, 23 in 28 v delu A Priloge I, za katere so določeni revidirani OSK, z učinkom od 22. decembra 2015, da bi s programom ukrepov, vključenih v okviru načrtov za upravljanje povodij za leto 2015, pripravljenih v skladu s členom 13(7) Direktive 2000/60/ES, v zvezi s temi snovmi do 22. decembra 2021 dosegli dobro kemijsko stanje površinskih voda, in
the newly identified substances numbered 34 to 45 in Part A of Annex I, with effect from 22 December 2018, with the aim of achieving good surface water chemical status in relation to those substances by 22 December 2027 and preventing deterioration in the chemical status of surface water bodies in relation to those substances.
novo določenih snovi št. 34 do 45 iz dela A Priloge I, z učinkom od 22. decembra 2018, da bi v zvezi s temi snovmi do 22. decembra 2027 dosegli dobro kemijsko stanje površinskih voda in preprečili poslabšanje kemijskega stanja površinskih voda v zvezi s temi snovmi.
For this purpose, Member States shall, by 22 December 2018, establish and submit to the Commission a supplementary monitoring programme and a preliminary programme of measures covering those substances.
Države članice zato do 22. decembra 2018 izdelajo dodatni program spremljanja in predhodni program ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na te snovi, ter ju predložijo Komisiji.
A final programme of measures in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2000/60/EC shall be established by 22 December 2021 and shall be implemented and made fully operational as soon as possible after that date and not later than 22 December 2024.
Končni program ukrepov v skladu s členom 11 Direktive 2000/60/ES se pripravi do 22. decembra 2021 in se ga kar se da hitro po tem datumu, vendar najpozneje do 22. decembra 2024, izvede in postane povsem delujoč.
Article 4(4) to (9) of Directive 2000/60/EC shall apply mutatis mutandis to the substances listed in points (i) and (ii) of the first subparagraph.
Za snovi iz točk (i) in (ii) prvega pododstavka se smiselno uporablja člen 4(4) do (9) Direktive 2000/60/ES.
For the substances numbered 5, 15, 16, 17, 21, 28, 34, 35, 37, 43 and 44 in Part A of Annex I, Member States shall apply the biota EQS laid down in Part A of Annex I.
Države članice za snovi pod številkami 5, 15, 16, 17, 21, 28, 34, 35, 37, 43 in 44 v delu A Priloge I uporabljajo OSK za organizme iz dela A Priloge I.
For substances other than those referred to in the first subparagraph, Member States shall apply the water EQS laid down in Part A of Annex I.
Za snovi, ki niso navedene v prvem pododstavku, države članice uporabljajo OSK za vode iz dela A Priloge I.
Member States may opt, in relation to one or more categories of surface water, to apply an EQS for a matrix other than that specified in paragraph 2, or, where relevant, for a biota taxon other than those specified in Part A of Annex I.
Države članice se lahko v zvezi z eno ali več vrstami površinskih voda odločijo za uporabo OSK za medij, ki ni določen v odstavku 2, ali po potrebi za takson, ki ni določen v delu A Priloge I.