natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following the provisional disclosure several interested parties claimed that the determination of normal value was flawed insofar as it was allegedly not established for the sales of like products in Brazil and therefore led to distorted and unfair results, particularly in respect of stoneware products and other product types that were not produced and sold in the analogue country.
Po začasnem razkritju je več zainteresiranih strani trdilo, da je pri določitvi normalne vrednosti prišlo do nepravilnosti, ker normalna vrednost domnevno ni bila določena za prodajo podobnega izdelka v Braziliji, kar naj bi privedlo do izkrivljenih in nepoštenih rezultatov, zlasti v zvezi z izdelki iz kamenine in drugimi vrstami izdelkov, ki naj se ne bi proizvajali in prodajali v primerljivi državi.
Some exporting producers also argued that the methodology for establishing the constructed normal value, referred to in recital (94) of the provisional Regulation, was not properly disclosed.
Nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so tudi trdili, da metodologija za določitev konstruirane normalne vrednosti iz uvodne izjave (94) začasne uredbe ni bila pravilno razkrita.
The comments received after the provisional disclosure show that the methodology used to determine the normal value was not fully clear to some interested parties.
Pripombe, prejete po začasnem razkritju, kažejo, da metodologija za določitev normalne vrednosti, nekaterim zainteresiranim stranem ni bila povsem jasna.
In order to address these comments, it is further explained that the methodology for determining the normal value has been the following.
V odgovor na te pripombe je metodologija za določanje normalne vrednosti v nadaljevanju dodatno pojasnjena.
Given that all requests for MET are denied normal value for all sampled exporting producers from the PRC was established on the basis of information received from the producer in the analogue country, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Ker so bili vsi zahtevki za TGO zavrnjeni, je bila normalna vrednost za vse vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the sales of the like product in Brazil to independent customers were representative.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej preučila, ali je bila prodaja podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam v Braziliji reprezentativna.
The sales of the Brazilian cooperating producer of the like product were found to be sold in representative quantities on the Brazilian domestic market compared to the product concerned exported to the Union by the exporting producers included in the sample.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila prodaja podobnega izdelka brazilskega sodelujočega proizvajalca na domačem brazilskem trgu po obsegu reprezentativna v primerjavi z zadevnim izdelkom, ki so ga vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki izvozili v Unijo.
In this respect it is recalled that according to Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation, ‘like product’ means a product that is identical, i.e. alike in all aspects, to the product under consideration or, in the absence of such a product, another product which, although not alike in all aspects, has characteristics closely resembling those of the product under consideration.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da v skladu s členom 1(4) osnovne uredbe izraz „podoben izdelek“ pomeni izdelek, ki je identičen, se pravi v vseh pogledih enak obravnavanemu izdelku, ali, če takega izdelka ni, kak drug izdelek, ki ima značilnosti, ki zelo spominjajo na značilnosti obravnavanega izdelka, čeprav mu ni enak v vseh pogledih.
The Commission subsequently examined whether these sales could be considered as having been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato preučila, ali se lahko ta prodaja šteje za običajen potek trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers.
To je bilo opravljeno z določitvijo deleža dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam.
The sales transactions were considered profitable where the unit price was equal to, or above, the cost of production.
Prodajni posli so veljali za dobičkonosne, če je bila cena za enoto enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov.
The cost of production of the cooperating Brazilian producer was therefore determined.
Zato so bili določeni proizvodni stroški sodelujočega brazilskega proizvajalca.
This examination demonstrated that for all product types more than 80 % by volume of sales on the domestic market were above cost and that the weighted average sales price of all types was equal to, or above, the unit cost of production.
Ta preiskava je pokazala, da je bilo za vse vrste izdelkov več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na domačem trgu nad stroški in da je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena vseh vrst izdelkov enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
Accordingly, normal value, by product type, was calculated as the weighted average of the actual domestic prices of all sales, irrespective of whether those sales were profitable or not.
Zato je bila normalna vrednost za posamezno vrsto izdelka izračunana kot tehtano povprečje dejanskih domačih cen vse prodaje ne glede na to, ali je bila prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
It follows that, contrary to what was indicated in recital (94) of the provisional Regulation, no constructed normal value has been established for non-profitable sales.
Iz tega sledi, da v nasprotju z uvodno izjavo (94) začasne uredbe konstruirana normalna vrednost za nedobičkonosno prodajo ni bila določena.
In the absence of any comments regarding export prices, recital (95) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izvoznimi cenami ni bilo pripomb, se uvodna izjava (95) začasne uredbe potrdi.
Following provisional disclosure several interested parties claimed that, generally, the methodology used for the comparison of normal value and export price was flawed as it did not compare like products and that the basis on which adjustments were made was not sufficiently explained.
Po začasnem razkritju je več zainteresiranih strani trdilo, da je bila metodologija, uporabljena za primerjavo normalne vrednosti in izvoznih cen v splošnem pomanjkljiva, saj podobni izdelki niso bili primerjani, podlaga, na kateri so bile opravljene prilagoditve, pa ni bila ustrezno obrazložena.
More particularly, one exporting producer claimed that for stoneware products, which were not produced and sold by the analogue producer, the Commission should have compared the export price with the domestic price for earthenware, duly adjusted, rather than constructing a normal value.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je na primer trdil, da bi pri izdelkih iz kamenine, ki jih primerljivi proizvajalec ne proizvaja in prodaja, Komisija namesto konstruiranja normalne vrednosti morala izvozno ceno primerjati z ustrezno prilagojeno domačo ceno za lončene izdelke.
Moreover, several exporting producers argued that for several other product types, which were produced and sold by exporting producers, a comparison between the export price and an average price per kg for a generic product type sold in Brazil based solely on the type of ceramic material used has inevitably lead to a comparison between products that are not like and thus to a flawed result.
Poleg tega je več proizvajalcev izvoznikov navedlo, da je za več drugih vrst proizvodov, ki so jih proizvedli in prodali proizvajalci izvozniki, zaradi primerjave med izvozno ceno in povprečno ceno na kg generične vrste izdelka, prodanega v Braziliji, ki temelji izključno na vrsti uporabljenega keramičnega materiala, neizogibno prišlo do primerjave izdelkov, ki niso podobni, in tako do nepravilnega rezultata.
In addition, one exporting producer claimed that the branding adjustment under Article 2(10)(k) was underestimated while another exporting producer claimed that the level of that adjustment was not based on any reliable or substantiated data and is therefore not justified.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je bila prilagoditev za trženje blagovne znamke v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) določena prenizko, drugi proizvajalec izvoznik pa je trdil, da navedena prilagoditev ni temeljila na zanesljivih ali utemeljenih podatkih in zato ni upravičena.
The same exporting producer also argued that its export prices should be adjusted for differences in quantities sold at different levels of trade.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil tudi, da bi morale biti njegove izvozne cene prilagojene glede na razlike v količinah, prodanih na različnih ravneh trgovine.
Finally, several interested parties claimed that the methodology used for adjustments for differences in physical characteristics are not well founded and it is unclear on which data these adjustments were made.
Več zainteresiranih strani je tudi trdilo, da metodologija, uporabljena za prilagoditev glede razlik v fizikalnih značilnostih ni ustrezno utemeljena, in da ni jasno, kateri podatki so bili uporabljeni za te prilagoditve.
In view of the comments received, the methodology used for price comparison and adjustments for the purpose of price comparability pursuant to Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation have been revised.
Ob upoštevanju prejetih pripomb je bila metodologija za primerjavo cen in prilagoditve za primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe spremenjena.
Most notably, for products that at the provisional stage were compared on the basis of the average price per kg for a generic product based solely on the ceramic material used, the comparison has been made with the closest resembling product (see recital (77) below), which allowed for a more accurate and fair price comparison.
Zlasti pri izdelkih, ki so bili v začasni preiskavi primerjani na podlagi povprečne cene na kg za generični izdelek izključno glede na uporabljeni keramični material, je bila opravljena primerjava z najbolj podobnim izdelkom (glej uvodno izjavo (77)), kar je omogočilo natančnejšo in pravičnejšo primerjavo cen.
The dumping margins were established by comparing the individual ex-works price of the sampled exporters to the domestic sales price of the analogue producer of the like product.
Za določitev stopnje dampinga je bila posamezna cena franko tovarna vzorčenih izvoznikov primerjana z domačo prodajno ceno primerljivega proizvajalca podobnega izdelka.
Some export transactions concerned, however, atypical product types, like serviette rings, knife rests or teapot stands, for which it was not possible to ensure a fair comparison.
Nekateri izvozni posli pa so zadevali netipične vrste izdelkov, kot so obročki za prtičke, stojala za nože ali podstavki za čajnik, za katere ni bilo mogoče zagotoviti poštene primerjave.
Therefore, also taking into account that these transactions were negligible as they accounted overall for only less than 0,5 % of export volumes, they were excluded.
Zato so bili ti posli izključeni, med drugim tudi zato, ker je njihov delež zanemarljiv, saj skupaj znaša manj kot 0,5 % obsega izvoza.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowances in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so bile opravljene ustrezne prilagoditve zaradi razlik, ki so vplivale na ceno in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustments were made, where appropriate, in respect of differences in physical characteristics, level of trade and for other factors affecting price comparability, notably branding.
Po potrebi so bile izvedene prilagoditve v zvezi z razlikami v fizikalnih značilnostih in ravnjo trgovine ter drugimi dejavniki, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen, zlasti trženje blagovne znamke.
First, it was examined whether an adjustment under Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation for differences in physical characteristics was warranted.
Najprej je bilo preverjeno, ali je prilagoditev zaradi razlik v fizikalnih značilnostih v skladu s členom 2(10)(a) osnovne uredbe utemeljena.
In cases where the normal value was determined on the basis of the closest resembling product (see recital (68) above), an adjustment was made for differences in the physical characteristics in order to ensure a fair price comparability between the like products.
Kadar je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi najbolj podobnega izdelka (glej uvodno izjavo (68)), je bila opravljena prilagoditev zaradi razlik v fizikalnih značilnostih, da se zagotovi poštena primerljivost cen podobnih izdelkov.
With regard to stoneware products, the export price was compared to the domestic sales price of the closest resembling product produced and sold in the analogue country, i.e. the sales price of products made of earthenware instead of stoneware, but identical in all other aspects, as adjusted upwards by 5 %, to reflect the price difference between stoneware and earthenware.
Pri izdelkih iz kamenine je bila izvozna cena primerjana z domačo prodajno ceno najbolj podobnega izdelka, proizvedenega in prodanega v primerljivi državi, tj. s prodajno ceno izdelkov, ki so izdelani iz lončenine namesto iz kamenine, sicer pa so navedenim izdelkom enaki v vseh drugih vidikih, pri čemer je bila ta cena za 5 % prilagojena navzgor zaradi upoštevanja cenovne razlike med kamenino in lončenino.
One exporting producer claims that both the production costs and the retail price for earthenware products are higher than for stoneware products.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da so proizvodni stroški in maloprodajne cene izdelkov iz lončenine višji kot pri izdelkih iz kamenine.
Accordingly, the export price for its stoneware products should have been adjusted downwards rather than upwards.
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba izvozno ceno njegovih izdelkov iz kamenine popraviti navzdol, ne pa navzgor.
In support of this claim, the exporting producer relies essentially on its own estimates of the production costs of earthenware and stoneware, respectively, and an extract from a price list indicating retail prices of earthenware and stoneware products.
V podporo tej trditvi se proizvajalec izvoznik opira predvsem na lastne ocene proizvodnih stroškov izdelkov iz lončenine in kamenine ter na izvleček iz cenika z maloprodajnimi cenami izdelkov iz lončenine in kamenine.
This information, which was provided very late in the proceedings, and only after the final disclosure, stands in stark contrast to the information that has been provided to the Commission throughout the investigation from other interested parties, i.e. the complainant, the Union industry and the producer in the analogue country.
Ti podatki, ki so bili predloženi zelo pozno v postopku in šele po dokončnem razkritju, močno nasprotujejo podatkom, ki so jih Komisiji med preiskavo predložile druge zainteresirane strani, tj. pritožnik, industrija Unije in proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
All those parties indicated that stoneware products are of a higher quality, i.e. more durable, than earthenware products and are more expensive to manufacture as stoneware is basically high-fired clay and earthenware low-fired clay.
Vse te strani so navedle, da so izdelki iz kamenine v primerjavi z izdelki iz lončenine višje kakovosti, tj. trpežnejši, njihova proizvodnja pa je dražja, saj so izdelani iz gline, ki jo je treba žgati pri višjih temperaturah kot izdelke iz lončenine.
Accordingly, stoneware can generally be sold at a higher price.
Zato se izdelki iz kamenine v splošnem lahko prodajajo po višji ceni.
This information is further corroborated by publicly available market information.
Te informacije so bile potrjene tudi z javno dostopnimi tržnimi informacijami.
It should further be noted that the exporting producer in question does not produce earthenware itself and has thus only provided an estimate of the production costs thereof.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik izdelkov iz lončenine sam ne proizvaja in je tako zanje predložil le oceno proizvodnih stroškov.
In addition, the submitted price list does not demonstrate conclusively that earthenware products are generally more expensive than stoneware products.
Poleg tega predloženi cenik ne dokazuje nedvoumno, da so izdelki iz lončenine v splošnem dražji od izdelkov iz kamenine.
Therefore, the evidence provided is not such as to demonstrate that the adjustment made for a fair price comparison between the normal value and the export price of stoneware products is flawed and the claim is accordingly rejected.
Ta trditev se zavrne, ker predložena dokazila ne dokazujejo, da je pri prilagoditvi zaradi pravične primerjave cen med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno izdelkov iz kamenine prišlo do nepravilnosti.
In respect of other product types for which the comparison at the provisional stage was based on the average price per kg and the ceramic material only, the Commission has further analysed the product types concerned and compared the export price with the closest resembling product type produced and sold in the analogue country.
Pri drugih vrstah izdelkov, pri katerih je primerjava v začasni preiskavi temeljila samo na povprečni ceni na kg in vrsti keramičnega materiala, je Komisija dodatno preučila zadevne vrste izdelkov in primerjala izvozno ceno s ceno najbolj podobne vrste izdelka, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v primerljivi državi.
Where only one minor physical characteristic differed, e.g. the type of glazing or decoration, while all other basic characteristics of the product type were identical, the sales price of the closest resembling type was adjusted by the actual price difference found for the difference in physical characteristic.
Če sta se vrsti izdelkov razlikovali samo v manj pomembni fizikalni značilnosti, na primer v glazuri ali dekoraciji, vse druge osnovne značilnosti vrste izdelka pa so bile enake, je bila prodajna cena najbolj podobne vrste izdelka prilagojena za dejansko razliko v ceni, ugotovljeno zaradi razlike v fizikalni značilnosti.
For other product types, where more than one physical characteristic differed, the export price was compared to the average sales price of the closest resembling product.
Pri drugih vrstah izdelkov, ki so se razlikovale v več kot eni fizikalni značilnosti, je bila izvozna cena primerjana s povprečno prodajno ceno najbolj podobnega izdelka.
For these product types, the closest resembling product shared several or all of the following basic physical characteristics; ceramic material, type of ware, basic shape, decoration and glazing.
Pri teh vrstah izdelkov je bilo za najbolj podoben izdelek značilno, da je bil enak v več ali vseh naslednjih osnovnih fizikalnih značilnostih: keramični material, vrsta izdelka, osnovna oblika, dekoracija in glazura.
Two sampled exporting producers claimed that, similar to the adjustments made in cases where only one minor physical characteristic was different, an adjustment should also be made where more than one physical characteristic of the closest resembling product was different.
Dva vzorčena proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila, da bi bilo treba podobno kot pri prilagoditvah v primerih, ko se izdelka razlikujeta le v eni manjši fizikalni značilnosti, prilagoditev opraviti tudi, ko se najbolj podoben izdelek od izdelka razlikuje v več kot eni fizikalni značilnosti.
It is recalled that in cases where only one minor physical characteristic differed, the sales price of the closest resembling product was adjusted to take into account the actual price difference found for the difference in question while, on the other hand, where more than one physical characteristic was different the comparison was made on the basis of the average sales price of the product with identical physical characteristics.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila pri razliki v eni manjši fizikalni značilnosti prodajna cena najbolj podobnega izdelka prilagojena, da se upošteva dejanska razlika v ceni, ugotovljena za zadevno razliko, kadar pa sta se izdelka razlikovala v več kot eni fizikalni značilnosti, je bila primerjava izvedena na podlagi povprečne prodajne cene izdelka z enakimi fizikalnimi značilnostmi.
Therefore, in the latter case, no price adjustment was required for any physical difference between the like products as they shared the same basic physical characteristics.
Zato v navedenem primeru prilagoditev cene zaradi morebitne razlike v fizikalnih značilnostih podobnih izdelkov ni bila potrebna, saj so imeli enake osnovne fizikalne značilnosti.
Accordingly, this claim cannot be accepted.
Zato se ta trditev ne more sprejeti.
One of the exporting producers mentioned above also claimed additional adjustments for differences in physical characteristics with regard to weight and whiteness of the product concerned.
Eden od zgoraj navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je poleg tega zahteval dodatne prilagoditve zaradi razlik v fizikalnih značilnostih v zvezi s težo in belino zadevnega izdelka.
It claimed that it uses raw material of a low standard and that, therefore, the cost and price of its products are lower than for the like product produced in the analogue country.
Trdil je, da uporablja surovine slabše kakovosti ter da so zato stroški in cene njegovih izdelkov nižji kot pri podobnem izdelku, proizvedenem v primerljivi državi.
Its export price should therefore be adjusted by a reasonable amount.
Njegovo izvozno ceno bi bilo zato treba popraviti z razumnim zneskom.
In this respect it is first recalled that the company was not granted market economy status and that its costs of production have thus not been verified.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da družbi ni bil odobren status tržnega gospodarstva, zato njeni stroški proizvodnje niso bili preverjeni.
In addition, the claim that its products are approximately 5 % heavier than standard products was not accompanied by any verifiable or supporting documents and therefore found to be unsubstantiated.
Poleg tega njena trditev, da so njeni izdelki za približno 5 % težji od standardnih izdelkov, ni bila podprta z preverljivimi ali podpornimi dokazili in se zato šteje za neutemeljeno.
Regarding the whiteness, as this exporting producer admitted in its submission that its products are of normal whiteness, it failed to explain why any adjustment should be warranted in this respect.
V zvezi z belino ta proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je v svojem stališču sicer priznal, da je za njegove izdelke značilna običajna belina, ni pojasnil, zakaj bi morala biti v zvezi s tem opravljena kakršna koli prilagoditev.
Therefore, those claims are rejected.
Zato se ti zahtevki zavrnejo.
Another exporting producer claimed that the Commission had failed to compare some of its export sales with the normal value of the appropriate closest resembling product.
Drug proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da Komisija ni primerjala nekaterih cen njegovega izvoza z normalno vrednostjo ustreznega najbolj podobnega izdelka.
These exports concerned sales of decorated products via an unrelated trader, which had, allegedly, provided the decoration (decal) free of charge.
Ta izvoz zadeva prodajo okrašenih izdelkov prek nepovezanega trgovca, ki je domnevno brezplačno poskrbel za okrasitev (odtis vzorcev).
As a consequence, the export price did not include the cost for decoration and should therefore have been compared with the normal value determined for undecorated products or, in the alternative, an average normal value of decorated and undecorated goods.
Zato izvozna cena ni vključevala stroškov za okrasitev in bi jo bilo zato treba primerjati z normalno vrednostjo, določeno za neokrašene izdelke, ali pa s povprečno normalno vrednostjo okrašenih in neokrašenih izdelkov.
It is recalled that the cost of production is not a relevant factor for the price comparability, which is based solely on a comparison between the normal value and the export price for like products.
Opozoriti je treba, da strošek proizvodnje ni relevanten dejavnik pri primerljivosti cen; slednja namreč temelji izključno na primerjavi normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene podobnih izdelkov.