natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On this basis, adjustments were made in respect of transport costs, rebates and discounts, commissions and credit costs.
Na tej podlagi so bile opravljene prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški prevoza, rabati in popusti, provizijami in stroški kreditov.
Pursuant to Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price per product type on an ex-work basis separately for each of the two exporting producers.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe se je ločeno za vsakega od obeh proizvajalcev izvoznikov tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno na podlagi franko tovarna.
As mentioned in recital 14, one common dumping margin is subsequently established for Interpipe by calculating a single weighted average rate of dumping for both exporting producers within Interpipe.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (14), je ena skupna stopnja dampinga, določena za Interpipe, izračunana z enotno tehtano povprečno stopnjo dampinga za oba proizvajalca izvoznika znotraj Interpipe.
On this basis, the dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is 13,8 %.
Na podlagi tega je stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, 13,8 %.
In its request for a partial interim review, the applicant claimed that changes in the corporate structure and production organisation, as well as a restructuring of the sales organisation on both the domestic and export markets, had had an impact on its cost structure and that, therefore, the existing level of the anti-dumping duty was no longer necessary in order to offset injurious dumping.
V zahtevku za delni vmesni pregled je vložnik trdil, da so spremembe v podjetniški strukturi in organizaciji proizvodnje ter prestrukturiranju organizacije prodaje na domačem trgu in na izvoznih trgih vplivale na strukturo stroškov in zato obstoječa stopnja protidampinške dajatve za izravnavo škodljivega dampinga ni več potrebna.
Accordingly, it was investigated whether the change in circumstances that led to the initiation of the interim review and the result thereof can reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s tem se je raziskalo, ali se sprememba okoliščin, ki je privedla do začetka vmesnega pregleda, in njene posledice lahko razumno obravnava, kot da je trajne narave.
The investigation established that the main factors leading to the lower dumping margin found in the review investigation are changes in the corporate organisation, which include a merger between two production companies, and a restructuring of the sales organisation, which has been streamlined.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so glavni dejavniki, ki so pripeljali do nižje stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, spremembe v podjetniški organizaciji, ki vključujejo združitev dveh proizvodnih družb in prestrukturiranje organizacije prodaje, ki je bila poenostavljena.
These changes, which have affected the cost structure of the applicant for the production and selling of the product concerned, are of a structural nature and thus unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.
Te spremembe, ki so vplivale na strukturo stroškov vložnika za proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka, so strukturne narave in zato ni verjetno, da bi se v bližnji prihodnosti spremenile.
Moreover, there were no indications of significant volatility in the applicant’s prices.
Poleg tega tudi ni bilo indicev o znatni nestanovitnosti cen vložnika.
It was therefore concluded that the changes are of a lasting nature and that the application of the existing measures at their current level is no longer necessary,
Zato se je sklenilo, da so spremembe trajne narave in da uporaba obstoječih ukrepov na sedanji ravni ni več potrebna –
The entry concerning LLC Interpipe Niko Tube and OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (Interpipe NTRP) in the table of Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2012 is hereby replaced by the following:
Vnos za LLC Interpipe Niko Tube in OJSC Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (Interpipe NTRP) v tabeli člena 1(2) Izvozne uredbe (EU) št. 585/2012 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
T-249/06 — Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP v Council, 2009 II-00383.
T-249/06 - Interpipe Niko Tube in Interpipe NTRP proti Svetu, 2009 II-00383.
Joined cases C-191/09 P and C-200/09 P — Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP.
Združeni zadevi C-191/09 P in C-200/09 P - Svet in Komisija proti Interpipe Niko Tube in Interpipe NTRP.
OJ L 174, 4.7.2012, p. 5.
UL L 174, 4.7.2012, str. 5.
OJ C 223, 29.7.2011, p. 8.
UL C 223, 29.7.2011, str. 8.
WT/DS337/R of 16 November 2007 — adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body on 15 January 2008.
WT/DS337/R z dne 16. novembra 2007, ki ga je organ za poravnavo sporov sprejel 15. januarja 2008.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 796/2012
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 796/2012
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of lever arch mechanisms originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz vzvodnih mehanizmov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 9(4), 11(2), 11(5) and 11(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9(4) ter člena 11(2), (5) in (6) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 1136/2006 [2] (‘the original Regulation’) the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 27,1 % and 47,4 % on imports of lever arch mechanisms (‘LAM’) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1136/2006 [2] („prvotna uredba“) je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 27,1 % in 47,4 % za uvoz vzvodnih mehanizmov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [3] of the definitive anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received on 26 April 2011 a request for the initiation of an expiry review of these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku veljavnosti [3] veljavnih dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov 26. aprila 2011 prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by LAMMA (Lever arch mechanism manufacturers association) on behalf of three Union producers (‘the applicant’) representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the Union production of lever arch mechanisms.
Zahtevek je vložilo združenje LAMMA (združenje proizvajalcev vzvodnih mehanizmov) v imenu treh proizvajalcev Unije („vložnik“), ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % proizvodnje vzvodnih mehanizmov v Uniji.
The request provided sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures imposed on imports of LAM originating in the PRC would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je vseboval dovolj dokazov, da bi iztek ukrepov, uvedenih na uvoz vzvodnih mehanizmov s poreklom iz LRK, verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga in škode industriji Unije.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 23 July 2011, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in je zato 23. julija 2011 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation concerning the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava v zvezi z verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2010 do 30. junija 2011 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2008 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2008 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the applicant, other known Union producers, exporting producers in the country concerned, unrelated importers, users in the Union known to be concerned, as well as the representatives of the country concerned of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila vložnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike v zadevni državi, nepovezane uvoznike, uporabnike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike zadevne države.
In view of the apparently large number of exporting producers in the PRC, unrelated importers and Union producers, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitnega velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, nepovezanih uvoznikov in proizvajalcev Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In respect of exporting producers in the PRC and unrelated importers, in order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a representative sample, those parties were requested to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the review and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK in nepovezani uvozniki pozvani, da se v 15 dneh od začetka pregleda javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
Given that no exporting producer in the PRC made itself known and provided the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation and that only one unrelated importer made itself known but did not provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation, sampling was not considered necessary in either case.
Ker se Komisiji ni javil noben proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK in tudi ni predložil zahtevanih informacij iz obvestila o začetku in ker se je javil samo en nepovezani uvoznik, ki pa Komisiji ni predložil informacij, zahtevanih v obvestilu o začetku, se je štelo, da vzorčenje v nobenem primeru ni potrebno.
The Commission announced in the notice of initiation that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku najavila, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
This sample consisted of two companies, out of the six Union producers that were known prior to the initiation of the investigation, selected on the basis of their sales and production volume of the product concerned in 2010 as well as geographic location in the Union.
Ta vzorec je zajemal dve podjetji od šestih proizvajalcev Unije, znanih pred začetkom preiskave, ki sta bili izbrani na podlagi obsega prodaje in proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka v letu 2010 ter geografske lokacije v Uniji.
The sample represented over 50 % of the total estimated Union production and sales during the RIP.
Vzorec je predstavljal več kot 50 % vse ocenjene proizvodnje Unije in prodaje v OPP.
Interested parties were invited to consult the file and to comment on the appropriateness of this choice within 15 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so bile pozvane, da pregledajo dokumentacijo in v 15 dneh od datuma objave obvestila o začetku predložijo pripombe o ustreznosti te izbire.
No interested party opposed the proposed sample.
Nobena zainteresirana stran ni nasprotovala predlaganemu vzorcu.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the two sampled Union producers, the importer that made itself known and all users known to be concerned.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike dvema vzorčenima proizvajalcema Unije, uvozniku, ki se ji je javil, in vsem uporabnikom, za katere je bilo znano, da jih to zadeva.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the two sampled Union producers and two users.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike sta poslala oba vzorčena proizvajalca Unije in dva uporabnika.
The unrelated importer mentioned in recital 9 that made itself known neither replied to the sampling questions nor filled in a questionnaire reply.
Nepovezani uvoznik iz uvodne izjave 9, ki se je javil Komisiji, ni niti odgovoril na vprašanja o vzorčenju niti ni izpolnil vprašalnika.
Union producers
proizvajalcev Unije:
Industria Meccanica Lombarda S.r.l., Offanengo, Italy,
Industria Meccanica Lombarda S.r.l., Offanengo, Italija,
user
uporabnika:
HIT OFFICE s.r.o., Teplice, Czech Republic.
HIT OFFICE s.r.o. Teplice, Češka.
The product concerned by this review is the same as the one in the original Regulation, namely lever arch mechanisms generally used for archiving sheets and other documents in binders or files currently falling within CN code ex83051000 (TARIC code 8305100050) (‘the product concerned’) and originating in the PRC.
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta pregled, je enak izdelku iz prvotne uredbe, in sicer so to vzvodni mehanizmi, ki se običajno uporabljajo za arhiviranje listov in drugih dokumentov v fasciklih ter mapah z nepovezanimi listi, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznako KN ex83051000 (oznaka TARIC 8305100050) („zadevni izdelek“), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
These lever arch mechanisms consist of arched sturdy metal elements (normally two) on a back plate and having at least one opening trigger that permits inserting and filing of sheets and other documents.
Ti vzvodni mehanizmi so sestavljeni iz (običajno dveh) čvrstih upognjenih kovinskih delov, ki sta pritrjena na hrbtišče in imata najmanj eno vzvodno ročico, ki omogoča vstavljanje in odlaganje listov in drugih dokumentov.
Ring binder mechanisms classified within the same CN code are not included in the scope of the product concerned for the purpose of this investigation.
Obročni mehanizmi za vezavo, uvrščeni pod isto oznako KN, za namen te preiskave niso vključeni v zadevni izdelek.
The present review investigation confirmed that, as in the original investigation, the product concerned and that produced in the Union by the Union producers have the same basic technical and physical characteristics and the same uses.
V sedanji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom je bilo tako kot v prvotni preiskavi potrjeno, da imata zadevni izdelek in izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvajajo proizvajalci Unije, enake osnovne tehnične in fizikalne lastnosti ter enake uporabe.
They were therefore considered to be like products according to Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ta izdelka štejeta za podobna izdelka v skladu s členom 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
C. LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
C. VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo proučeno, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi iztek veljavnih ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga.
As mentioned in recital 9, none of the known Chinese exporting producers contacted at initiation cooperated in the investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 9, noben od znanih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, s katerimi je Komisija stopila v stik ob začetku postopka, ni sodeloval v preiskavi.
The Chinese authorities were notified of this fact as well as of the possible application of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, and were given an opportunity to present their comments.
Kitajski organi so bili o tem obveščeni, kot tudi o možni uporabi člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe, dana pa jim je bila tudi možnost, da predložijo svoje pripombe.
No comments were received in this regard.
V zvezi s tem ni bila prejeta nobena pripomba.
Therefore, and in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, the findings in relation to the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping set out below had to be based on facts available, in particular publicly available information such as official company websites and product web search engines, information in the request for review and information obtained from cooperating parties in the course of the review investigation (namely, the applicants and the sampled Union producers).
Iz tega razloga in v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe so ugotovitve v zvezi z verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga, navedene v nadaljevanju, morale temeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih, zlasti na javno dostopnih informacijah, kot so uradne spletne strani podjetij in spletni iskalniki za iskanje izdelkov, informacije iz zahtevka za pregled in informacije, pridobljene od sodelujočih strank med preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom (tj. vložnikov in vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije).
For the purpose of establishing normal value, the notice of initiation made reference to the use of an analogue country.
Za določitev normalne vrednosti se je obvestilo o začetku sklicevalo na uporabo primerljive države.
As concerns the export price, due to the lack of cooperation from both exporting producers in the PRC and unrelated importers in the Union market, the Commission was unable to establish any export sales quantities or prices on a transactional basis.
V zvezi z izvozno ceno zaradi pomanjkanja sodelovanja obeh proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK in nepovezanih uvoznikov v Uniji Komisija ni mogla določiti izvoznih količin ali cen na podlagi transakcij.
In this respect, the Commission considered alternative means to determine the export price.
Komisija je v zvezi s tem proučila druge načine določanja izvozne cene.
Firstly, it was considered whether Eurostat, cross-checked with other available data, could be used as an alternative means to establish export prices.
Prvič, proučila je, ali bi lahko kot drug način za določitev izvoznih cen uporabila podatke Eurostata, z navzkrižnim preverjanjem drugih razpoložljivih podatkov.
These were considered unsuitable in so far as one of the sources also covered imports other than the product concerned and the other sources did not allow for the possibility to compare export prices with those of the Union industry on a type-per-type basis.
To je obveljalo za neprimerno, ker je eden od virov obsegal tudi uvoz drugih izdelkov in ne le zadevnega izdelka, drugi viri pa niso omogočali primerjave izvoznih cen s cenami industrije Unije za vsak posamezni tip.
Secondly, the Commission also considered having recourse to the export prices contained in the request for review.
Drugič, Komisija je proučila uporabo izvoznih cen, vsebovanih v zahtevku za pregled.
It is recalled that this methodology was used in the original investigation and that it permits a comparison on a type-per-type basis.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila ta metodologija uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi in da omogoča primerjavo za vsak posamezni tip.
However, the invoices contained in the request for review were for export prices to other third countries.
Vendar so se računi, ki jih je vseboval zahtevek za pregled, nanašali na izvozne cene v druge tretje države.
Accordingly, no dumping calculation could be made on the basis of export prices to the Union and it was not possible to establish an affirmative determination of dumping.
Zato na podlagi izvoznih cen za Unijo ni bilo mogoče izračunati dampinga in ni bilo mogoče sprejeti pozitivne ugotovitve v zvezi z obstojem dampinga.
The investigation therefore focused on the likelihood of a recurrence of dumping.
Preiskava je bila zato osredotočena na verjetnost ponovitve dampinga.
As regards the investigation of the likelihood of recurrence of dumping, the following elements were analysed: the relationship between normal value and export prices to third countries; production capacity, production and spare capacity in the PRC; and the attractiveness of the Union market in relation to imports from the PRC.
V preiskavi verjetnosti ponovitve dampinga so bili analizirani naslednji dejavniki: razmerje med normalno vrednostjo in izvoznimi cenami za tretje države; proizvodna zmogljivost, proizvodnja in prosta zmogljivost v LRK; ter privlačnost trga Unije v zvezi z uvozom iz LRK.
In view of the lack of cooperation from exporting producers in the PRC, normal value was compared to export prices from the PRC in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi pomanjkanja sodelovanja proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK je bila normalna vrednost primerjana z izvoznimi cenami iz LRK v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
Basis for determining normal value
Podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti
Since the PRC is an economy in transition, in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation normal value had to be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in an appropriate market economy third country (the analogue country), or the price from the analogue country to other countries, including the Union, or, where those are not possible, on any other reasonable basis, including the price actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product, duly adjusted if necessary to include a reasonable profit margin.
Glede na to, da je gospodarstvo LRK v tranziciji, je bilo treba v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe določiti normalno vrednost na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v ustrezni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“) ali cene, ki velja pri izvozu iz primerljive države v druge države, vključno z Unijo, kadar to ni mogoče, pa na kateri koli drugi razumni podlagi, vključno s ceno, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje v Uniji za podobni izdelek in je po potrebi ustrezno prilagojena, da vključuje razumno stopnjo dobička.
The request for review by the Union industry cited a number of producers in market economy countries other than the Union (namely, India, Iran and Thailand).
Zahtevek za pregled, ki ga je vložila industrija Unije, je navajal več proizvajalcev v državah s tržnim gospodarstvom, ki niso iz Unije (tj. v Indiji, Iranu in na Tajskem).
Upon initiation, these producers were duly contacted by the Commission as well as other potential producers in such countries that could be identified from publicly available sources.
Po začetku postopka je Komisija ustrezno vzpostavila stik s temi proizvajalci, pa tudi z drugimi možnimi proizvajalci v teh državah, ki jih je uspela opredeliti s pomočjo javno dostopnih virov.
The notice of initiation specified that if no cooperation was forthcoming from producers in market economy countries other than the Union, the Commission envisaged using the prices actually paid or payable in the Union as the basis for determining the normal value.
V obvestilu o začetku je bilo navedeno, da v primeru, da proizvajalci iz držav s tržnim gospodarstvom, ki niso države Unije, ne sodelujejo, Komisija predvidi uporabo cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo v Uniji, kot podlago za določitev normalne vrednosti.