natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See Restructuring of Enterprises Act 47/1993, Section 1.
Glej Zakon o prestrukturiranju podjetij 47/1993, oddelek 1.
See Restructuring of Enterprises Act 47/1993, Section 17.
Glej Zakon o prestrukturiranju podjetij 47/1993, oddelek 17.
According to Section 3 point 7 of the Restructuring of Enterprises Act 47/1993, secured debts means restructuring debt where the creditor holds, as against third parties, an effective real security right to property that belongs to or is in the possession of the debtor, in so far as the value of the proceedings would have been enough to cover the amount of the creditor’s claim after the deduction of liquidation costs and claims with a higher priority.
V skladu s točko 7 odstavka 3 Zakona o prestrukturiranju podjetij 47/1993 zavarovani dolgovi pomenijo dolg prestrukturiranja, ko ima upnik v lasti, proti tretjim osebam, učinkovito dejansko zavarovalno pravico do lastnine, ki pripada dolžniku ali je v njegovi lasti, če bi bila vrednost postopka dovolj velika za kritje zneska upnikovega zahtevka po odbitku stroškov likvidacije in zahtevkov z višjo prednostjo.
The reduction of interest rates was referred to as measure 2 in the first opening decision.
Znižanje obrestnih mer je bilo navedeno kot ukrep 2 v prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka.
The reduction of interest rates for unpaid charges was referred to as measure 4 in the first opening decision.
Znižanje obrestnih mer za neplačane stroške je bilo navedeno kot ukrep 4 v prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka.
The two evaluations determined the market value of the pledged premises, based on comparable prices and rental information; they were undertaken by Kaakon Notariaatti Oy, www.kaakonnotariaatti.fi and Catella Property Oy, www.catella.fi.
Obe oceni sta ugotovili tržno vrednost zastavljenih prostorov na podlagi primerljivih cen in informacij o najemu, opravili pa sta jih podjetji Kaakon Notariaatti Oy, www.kaakonnotariaatti.fi, in Catella Property Oy, www.catella.fi.
The studies have been ordered by Karjaportti’s bankruptcy administrator.
Študiji je naročil stečajni upravitelj podjetja Karjaportti.
Since then, Karjaportti has paid the due interest for the secured debts.
Od takrat je podjetje Karjaportti plačalo zapadle obresti za zavarovane dolgove.
The conversion of unpaid interest rates was referred to as measure 3 in the first opening decision.
Pretvorba neplačanih obrestnih mer je bila navedena kot ukrep 3 v prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka.
The guarantee was referred to as measure 5 in the first opening decision.
Poroštvo je bilo navedeno kot ukrep 5 v prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka.
These measures were referred to as measure 6 in the first opening decision.
Ti ukrepi so bili navedeni kot ukrep 6 v prvi odločitvi o začetku postopka.
The proposals are dated 26 May 2009, 28 September 2009, 18 November 2009, 22 January 2010, 17 February 2010, 12 April 2010, 2 June 2010, 23 August 2010, 3 November 2010, 10 February 2011 and 31 May 2011.
Predlogi so z dne 26. maja 2009, 28. septembra 2009, 18. novembra 2009, 22 januarja 2010, 17 februarja 2010, 12. aprila 2010, 2. junija 2010, 23. avgusta 2010, 3. novembra 2010, 10. februarja 2011 in 31. maja 2011.
Commission decision N 715/06, Finland.
Odločitev Komisije št. 715/06, Finska.
Tax Exemption to Finnvera Oyj, OJ C 307, 18.12.2007, p. 6.
Davčna oprostitev podjetja Finnvera Oyl, UL C 307, 18.12.2007, str. 6.
OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 14, point 4.2.
UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 14, točka 4.2.
OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2; prolonged in 2009, OJ C 156, 9.7.2009, p. 3.
UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2; podaljšane leta 2009, UL C 156, 9.7.2009, str. 3.
See Case C 480/98 Kingdom of Spain v Commission [2000] ECR I-08717, paragraph 18.
Glej zadevo C-480/98, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji, [2000] Recueil, str. I-08717, točka 18.
See Point 79 of the R&R Guidelines 1999: "Subject to the provisions set out below, these Guidelines shall enter into force on the date of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. They shall remain in force, unless otherwise stipulated in any new decision, for five years." The R & R Guidelines 1999 were published on 9 October 1999.
Glej točko 97 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 1999: „S pridržkom spodaj navedenih določb začnejo te smernice veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti. Če v novih odločbah ne bo določeno drugače, ostanejo v veljavi pet let.“ Smernice za reševanje in prestrukturiranje so bile objavljene 9. oktobra 1999.
See Point 102 of the R&R Guidelines 2004.
Glej točko 102 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004.
According to minutes of a City Council meeting from 8 March 2004, Karjaportti had started restructuring its debts earlier that year and asked the City of Mikkeli to agree on a deferral of the instalments due in 2004 to the year 2005 for the loan granted in 2000, guaranteed by the City of Mikkeli (which was accepted by the City Council).
Glede na zapisnik seje mestnega sveta z dne 8. marca 2004 je podjetje Karjaportti začelo s prestrukturiranjem svojih dolgov v začetku navedenega leta in je zaprosilo mesto Mikkeli za soglasje k odlogu plačila obrokov posojila z roki v letih 2004 in 2005, dodeljenega leta 2000, ki jih je zajamčilo mesto Mikkeli (ki ga je mestni svet sprejel).
Point 2.1 of the Guarantee Notice 2008.
Točka 2.1 obvestila o poroštvih 2008.
See Joined Cases C-341/06 P and C-342/06 P Chronopost SA and La Poste v Union française de l’express (UFEX) and Others [2008] ECR I-04777, paragraph 95.
Glej združeni zadevi C-341/06 P in C-342/06 P, Chronopost SA in La Poste proti Union française de l’express (UFEX) in drugi, [2008] ZOdl, str. I-04777, točka 95.
According to the Minutes of the City Council of Mikkeli of 12 June 2000, "… it must be observed that the risk to the City is great during the first years …".
Glede na zapisnik mestnega sveta mesta Mikkeli z dne 12. junija 2000„je treba pripomniti, da je tveganje za mesto v prvih letih veliko …“
See Section 6 of the RAG 1998.
Glej oddelek 6 smernic o regionalni pomoči 1998.
Commission Decision in case N238/1999, letter to Finland dated 13 December 1999 concerning the regional aid map 2000-2006,
Odločba Komisije v zadevi N238/1999, dopis Finski z dne 13. decembra 1999 glede karte regionalnih pomoči 2000–2006.
See Case T-14/96 Bretagne Angleterre Irlande (BAI) v Commission [1999] ECR II-139 paragraph 71; Joined Cases T-116/01 and T-118/01, P & O European Ferries (Vizcaya), SA and Diputación Foral de Vizcaya v. Commission [2003] ECR II-02957, paragraphs 114 et seq.
Glej zadevo T-14/96, Bretagne Angleterre Irlande (BAI) proti Komisiji, [1999] Recueil, str. II-139, točka 71, združeni zadevi T-116/01 in T-118/01, P & O European Ferries (Vizcaya), SA in Diputación Foral de Vizcaya proti Komisiji, [2003] Recueil, str. II-02957, točka 114 in naslednje.
See recital (25); when the possession on the property was transferred to the City of Mikkeli, it was free of mortgages.
Glej uvodno izjavo (25); ob prenosu lastništva zemljišča mestu Mikkeli zemljišče ni bilo obremenjeno s hipotekami.
See Point 4.4, fn. 10 and fn. 21 of the RAG 1998.
Glej opombi 10 in 21 točke 4.4 smernic o regionalni pomoči 1998.
According to Section 6 of the R&R Guidelines 1999, they applied until 9 October 2004; see fn. 37 above.
V skladu z oddelkom 6 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 1999 so se uporabljale do 9. oktobra 2004; glej opombo 37.
Case T-95/11 BP Chemicals v Commission [1998] ECR II-3235.
Zadeva T-95/11 BP, Chemicals proti Komisiji, [1998] Recueil, str. II-3235.
Case T-95/11 BP Chemicals v Commission [1998] ECR II-3235, paragraphs 171 and 172.
Zadeva T-95/11, BP Chemicals proti Komisiji, [1998] Recueil, str. II-3235, točki 171 in 172.
See Case C 480/98 Kingdom of Spain v Commission [2000] ECR I-08717, paragraph 19.
Glej zadevo C-480/98, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji, [2000] Recueil, str. I-08717, točka 19.
See […].
Glej […].
See Case T-152/99 Hamsa v Commission [2002] ECR II-3049, paragraph 158.
Glej zadevo T-152/99, Hamsa proti Komisiji, [2002] Recueil, str. II-3049, točka 158.
See Case T-36/99 Lenzing AG v Commission [2004] ECR II-3597, paragraph 152.
Glej zadevo T-36/99, Lenzing AG proti Komisiji, [2004] ZOdl, str. II-3597, točka 152.
See Case C-342/96 Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-2459, paragraph 46.
Glej zadevo C-342/96, Španija proti Komisiji, [1999] Recueil, str. I-2459, točka 46.
See Case T-36/99 Lenzing AG v Commission [2004] ECR II-3597, paragraph 140 et seq.
Glej zadevo T-36/99, Lenzing AG proti Komisiji, [2004] ZOdl, str. II-3597, točke 140 in naslednje.
Case C-482/99 French Republic/Commission (Stardust Marine) [2002] ECR I-4397.
Zadeva C-482/99, Francoska republika proti Komisiji, (Stardust Marine), [2002] Recueil, str. I-4397.
Case T-358/94 Air France vs. Commission [1996] ECR II-2109, paragraphs 55-61.
Zadeva T-358/94, Air France proti Komisiji, [1996] Recueil, str. II-2109, točke 55–61.
Case C-482/99 French Republic/Commission (Stardust Marine) [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraph 50-59.
Zadeva C-482/99, Francoska republika proti Komisiji (Stardust Marine), [2002] Recueil, str. I-4397, točke 50–59.
See Article 5(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006, OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 5.
Glej člen 5(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1998/2006, UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str. 5.
See Case C-70/72 Commission v Germany [1973] ECR 00813, paragraph 13.
Glej zadevo C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, [1973] Recueil, str. 00813, točka 13.
See Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraph 75.
Glej združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, [1994] Recueil, str. I-4103, točka 75.
See Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission [1999] ECR I-030671 paragraphs 64-65.
Glej zadevo C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, [1999] Recueil, str. I-030671, točki 64 in 65.
Point 2.2 and Point 4.1.(a) of the Guarantee Notice 2008
Točka 2.2 in točka 4.1(a) obvestila o poroštvih 2008.
Those comments were received by letter dated 28 August 2009.
Finska je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 28. avgusta 2009.
Finland provided further information by e-mail dated 3 November 2009.
Nadaljnje informacije je Finska predložila v elektronski pošti z dne 3. novembra 2009.
In addition, the Commission addressed questions to Finland, to which Finland replied by letter dated 22 April 2010.
Poleg tega je Komisija Finski predložila vprašanja, na katera je Finska odgovorila z dopisom z dne 22. aprila 2010.
The Commission sent an information request to Finland on 15 July 2010, to which Finland replied on 20 August 2010.
Komisija je Finski 15. julija 2010 poslala zahtevo po informacijah, na katero je Finska odgovorila 20. avgusta 2010.
Another information request was sent by the Commission on 28 September 2010, to which Finland replied on 29 November 2010.
Komisija je 28. septembra 2010 poslala še eno zahtevo po informacijah, na katero je Finska odgovorila 29. novembra 2012.
Lastly, the Commission asked for additional information by letter dated 16 November 2011.
Komisija je nato zaprosila za dodatne informacije z dopisom z dne 16. novembra 2011.
Finland submitted that information on 16 December 2011.
Finska je navedene informacije predložila 16. decembra 2011.
The co-operative was originally established in 1914.
Zadruga je bila prvotno ustanovljena leta 1914.
In 1950 it was named Osuusteurastamo Karjaportti; from 31 December 2002 it was known as Järvi-Suomen Portti Osuuskunta and since 14 December 2010, it has been known as Karjaportti.
Leta 1950 se je preimenovala v Osuusteurastamo Karjaportti, od 31. decembra 2002 je delovala pod imenom Järvi-Suomen Portti Osuuskunta, 14. decembra 2010 pa se je preimenovala v Karjaportti.
The loan and the guarantee respectively were given to replace a loan granted by Tapiola for which the City of Mikkeli had originally granted a guarantee by a decision of 2 November 1992.
Posojilo oziroma poroštvo sta bila dodeljena, da nadomestita posojilo, ki ga je odobrila banka Tapiola, za katerega je mesto Mikkeli prvotno dodelilo poroštvo s sklepom z dne 2. novembra 1992.
The original loan amounted to FIM 7,5 million (EUR 1261409) and was granted at an interest rate of 4,5 % for a duration of 10 years.
Prvotno posojilo je znašalo 7,5 milijona FIM (1261409 EUR) in je bilo dodeljeno po 4,5-odstotni obrestni meri za obdobje 10 let.
The court-supervised proceedings concerning Karjaportti were commenced by decision of the District Court of Mikkeli on 1 December 2004.
Postopek prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča v zvezi s podjetjem Karjaportti se je s sklepom okrožnega sodišča mesta Mikkeli začel 1. decembra 2004.
Legally, from the commencement, the debtor is not allowed to repay restructuring debts or provide security for such debts [18].
Zakon pravi, da od začetka postopka dolžnik ne sme več poplačati dolgov prestrukturiranja ali zagotoviti zastave za take dolgove [18].
For both parts the interest rates were reduced according to the restructuring programme: On a portion of EUR 4,0 million, the interest rate amounted to […] EURIBOR minus […]% (however, the rate was supposed not be more than […]% or less than […]%) until 31 December 2010.
Za oba dela so se zmanjšale obrestne mere v skladu s programom prestrukturiranja: za 4-milijonski del EUR je obrestna mera do 31 decembra 2010 znašala […] EURIBOR, znižan za […] % (vendar obrestna mera ni smela biti večja od […] % ali manjša od […] %).
After that date, an interest rate of […] EURIBOR has been charged.
Po tem roku je bila zaračunana obrestna mera v višini […] EURIBOR.
Nordea Bank and Nordea Financing
Nordea Bank in Nordea Financing
According to the restructuring programme, the reimbursement of the secured debts of the City of Mikkeli is foreseen for 2015.
V skladu s programom prestrukturiranja je povračilo zavarovanih dolgov mesta Mikkeli predvideno za leto 2015.
The first instalment should have been paid on 1 July 2009, from 2010 onwards two instalments per year were foreseen, and in 2015 the remaining major part of the secured debts has to be paid, that is EUR […] for the loans due to triggered guarantees and EUR […] for other debts (unpaid charges) respectively.
Prvi obrok bi moral biti plačan 1. julija 2009, od leta 2010 sta bila predvidena dva obroka na leto in leta 2015 mora biti plačan preostali veliki del zavarovanih dolgov, kar je […] EUR za zapadla posojila zaradi sproženih poroštev oziroma […] EUR za druge dolgove (neplačane stroške).
According to the restructuring programme, the reimbursement of the loans and unpaid charges to the City of Mikkeli should be accomplished by 2015, with the major part of the outstanding amount due in 2015.
V skladu s programom prestrukturiranja bi morali biti posojila in neplačani stroški mestu Mikkeli povrnjeni do leta 2015, pri čemer se večji del neporavnanega zneska povrne leta 2015.
If in 2015 Karjaportti does not meet certain economic requirements at the end of the court-supervised restructuring proceedings (ratio between liabilities and operating margin bigger than 4), the City of Mikkeli will waive a maximum of EUR [0-3] million of the outstanding debts.
Če leta 2015 podjetje Karjaportti ne bo izpolnjevalo določenih gospodarskih zahtev po koncu postopka prestrukturiranja pod nadzorom sodišča (če bo razmerje med obveznostmi in operativno maržo večje od 4), bo mesto Mikkeli opustilo največ [0–3] milijonov EUR neporavnanih dolgov.
Nordea Bank will waive a maximum of EUR [0-3 million] and Nordea Financing will waive a maximum of EUR [0-2 million]. Finnvera's claim will be reduced by a maximum of EUR [0-2 million].
Banka Nordea Bank bo opustila največ [0–3 milijonov] EUR in banka Nordea Financing največ [0–2 milijona] EUR. Zahtevek podjetja Finnvera bo zmanjšan za največ [0–2 milijona] EUR. Zahtevek […] ne bo zmanjšan.
The claim of […] will not be reduced. According to the restructuring programme, the sums by which the secured debts are reduced are based on the value of the collaterals for the secured loans in two different scenarios: first scenario was that Karjaportti continues its operation; second scenario was that Karjaportti changes or terminates its operation, that is to say that the collaterals have to be realised.
V skladu s programom prestrukturiranja zneski, za katere se zmanjšajo zavarovani dolgovi, temeljijo na vrednosti zavarovanj s premoženjem za zavarovana posojila v dveh različnih primerih: prvi primer je bil, da podjetje Karjaportti še naprej deluje, drugi primer pa je bil, da podjetje Karjaportti spremeni delovanje ali z njim preneha, kar pomeni, da morajo biti zavarovanja s premoženjem uresničena.
Karjaportti did not pay interest due for the secured debts of the City of Mikkeli accrued between 16 December 2004 and 19 December 2005 [25].
Podjetje Karjaportti ni plačalo zapadlih obresti za zavarovane dolgove mesta Mikkeli, ki so nastale med 16. decembrom 2004 in 19. decembrom 2005 [25].
Those interests amounted to EUR 281982 and were converted into a loan for a loan period until the end of 2010 by decision of the City Council of Mikkeli dated 19 December 2005.
Navedene obresti so znašale 281982 EUR in so bile s sklepom mestnega sveta mesta Mikkeli z dne 19. decembra 2005 pretvorjene v posojilo za obdobje odplačila do konca leta 2010.
The interest rate of the loan is EURIBOR 3 months plus 0,3 %.
Obrestna mera posojila znaša 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 0,3 %.
The repayment was supposed to start in March 2009 and consisted of four equal instalments to be paid twice a year, that is to say EUR 144991 should be paid in 2009 and EUR 144991 in 2010 [26].
Povračilo naj bi se začelo marca 2009 in bi moralo zajemati štiri enake obroke, ki bi bili plačani dvakrat letno, kar pomeni, da bi moralo biti leta 2009 plačanih 144991 EUR in leta 2010144991 EUR [26].
The repayment of the due amounts was at least partially postponed (see measure 12).
Povračilo dolgovanih zneskov je bilo vsaj deloma odloženo (glej ukrep 12).
Accordingly, on 28 December 2005, [one private creditor] converted interest rates into a loan amounting to approximately EUR 1623000 with a loan period until the end of 2010.
V skladu s tem je 28. decembra 2005 [en zasebni upnik] pretvoril obrestne mere v posojilo, ki je znašalo približno 1623000 EUR, z obdobjem odplačila do konca leta 2010.
The interest rate was EURIBOR 3 months plus 1,5 %.
Obrestna mera je bila 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 1,5 %.
On 29 December 2005, [another private creditor] converted interest rates into a loan amounting to approx. EUR 1532500 with a loan period until the end of 2010.
[Drug zasebni upnik] je 29. decembra 2005 pretvoril obrestne mere v posojilo, ki je znašalo približno 1532500 EUR, z obdobjem odplačila do konca leta 2010.
The interest rate was 3 months EURIBOR plus 2 %.
Obrestna mera je bila 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 2 %.
Finnvera is exempted from paying income tax since 25 September 2007.
Podjetje Finnvera je oproščeno plačevanja dohodnine od 25. septembra 2007.
The Commission has approved this exemption.
Komisija je to oprostitev odobrila.
The duration of the loan was until the end of 2010 and repayment should have started in 2009.
Posojilo je veljalo do konca leta 2010 in povračilo bi se moralo začeti leta 2009.
On 28 December 2005, [a private creditor] converted interest rates into a loan amounting to approximately EUR 1623000 with a loan period until the end of 2010.
[En zasebni upnik] je 28. decembra 2005 pretvoril obrestne mere v posojilo, ki je znašalo približno 1623000 EUR, z obdobjem odplačila do konca leta 2010.
The interest rate is EURIBOR 3 months plus 1,5 %.
Obrestna mera je bila 3-mesečni EURIBOR, zvišan za 1,5 %.
The loan had a duration of six months and should have been reimbursed by 15 January 2008.
Posojilo je veljalo za obdobje šestih mesecev in bi moralo biti povrnjeno do 15. januarja 2008.
So far, only part of the loan was reimbursed (outstanding amount on 23 November 2011: […]).
Do sedaj je bil povrnjen le del posojila (neporavnani znesek z dne 23. novembra 2011: […]).
Finland states that the guaranteed loan was granted to offset an old pension loan that was granted in 1992.
Finska trdi, da je bilo posojilo s poroštvom dodeljeno za pobotanje starega posojila za pokojnine, ki je bilo dodeljeno leta 1992.
At that time, the City of Mikkeli, together with Finnvera and […], guaranteed for the pension loan.
V tistem času je mesto Mikkeli, skupaj s podjetjem Finnvera in […], jamčilo za posojilo za pokojnine.
As a counter-security, the City of Mikkeli received a mortgage with the value of FIM 7,5 million (EUR 1261409) on a property of Karjaportti.
Kot dodatno poroštvo je mesto Mikkeli prejelo hipoteko v vrednosti 7,5 milijona FIM (1261409 EUR) na zemljišče podjetja Karjaportti.
Finally, Finland disputes that Karjaportti was in difficulty within the meaning of the R&R Guidelines 1999 in spring 2004.
Finska trdi tudi, da podjetje Karjaportti spomladi leta 2004 ni bilo v težavah v smislu smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje1999.
Finally, in December 2004, Karjaportti was considered a viable undertaking when its creditors approved the restructuring despite its prolonged financial difficulties.
Decembra 2004 je bilo podjetje Karjaportti obravnavano kot uspešno delujoče podjetje, ko so njegovi upniki odobrili prestrukturiranje kljub dolgotrajnim finančnim težavam.
Otherwise, Karjaportti would have been declared bankrupt.
Drugače bi razglasili, da je podjetje Karjaportti v stečaju.
Finland considers the guarantee as a continuum of funding provided for the investment in the Tikkala production facility in the year 2000 by the City of Mikkeli.
Finska meni, da je poroštvo nadaljevanje finančnih sredstev, ki jih je mesto Mikkeli zagotovilo za naložbo v proizvodni obrat Tikkala leta 2000.
The guarantee was granted to complete the original investment plan initiated in 2000.
Poroštvo je bilo dodeljeno za dokončanje prvotnega naložbenega načrta, začetega leta 2000.
At the time the guarantee was granted, Karjaportti was not in difficulty within the meaning of the R&R Guidelines 1999, as already brought forward for the guarantee granted in March 2004 (see recital 93).
Ob dodelitvi poroštva podjetje Karjaportti ni bilo v težavah v smislu smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 1999, kot je že bilo navedeno za poroštvo, dodeljeno marca 2004 (glej uvodno izjavo 93).
According to Finland, if the guarantee involved state aid, it was compatible as it was in line with the RAG 1998.
Po navedbah Finske je bilo poroštvo, tudi če je zajemalo državno pomoč, skladno s smernicami o regionalni pomoči 1998.
Before the notification of the guarantee was withdrawn in March 2010, Finland argued that the guarantee was compatible according to the R&R Guidelines 2004.
Pred umaknitvijo priglasitve poroštva marca 2010 je Finska trdila, da je poroštvo v skladu s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje 2004.
In light of the withdrawal of the notification, Finland's arguments are not presented in more detail.
Ob upoštevanju umaknitve priglasitve trditve Finske niso podrobneje predstavljene.
Finland considers that the guarantee was granted in line with the Guarantee Notice 2000.
Finska meni, da je bilo poroštvo dodeljeno v skladu z obvestilom o poroštvih 2000.
In any event, the guarantee did not involve state aid.
V vsakem primeru poroštvo ni zajemalo državne pomoči.
In addition, two private creditors granted credit facilities to Karjaportti at the same time in order to allow for funding the postponement of the 2004 payments.
Poleg tega sta dva zasebna upnika ob istem času podjetju Karjaportti dodelila kreditna programa, da se je lahko financiral odlog plačil za leto 2004.
Furthermore, the guarantee was subject to a high fee and the aid element of the guarantee was below the de-minimis threshold.
Za poroštvo je veljala tudi visoka provizija in element pomoči poroštva je bil pod pragom de minimis.
In any event, the guarantee does not involve state aid as it only covers 16,7 % of EUR 1,8 million and private creditors were covering the remainder of this amount by way of guarantees.
V vsakem primeru poroštvo ne zajema državne pomoči, saj krije le 16,7 % od 1,8 milijona EUR, zasebni upniki pa so krili preostali del tega zneska s poroštvi.
Finland considers that the counter-guarantee was granted in accordance with the Guarantee Notice 2000.
Finska meni, da je bilo posredno osebno jamstvo dodeljeno v skladu z obvestilom o poroštvih 2000.