natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
points out that the EEAS is fully responsible for its operation and notes that the EEAS has stated it has taken the necessary steps to avoid the recurrence of non-compliance;
opozarja, da je ESZD v celoti odgovorna za svoje delovanje, in je seznanjen z njeno izjavo, da je sprejela potrebne ukrepe, da se nespoštovanje predpisov v prihodnje ne bi ponovilo;
requests that the EEAS, in the context of the 2012 discharge procedure, informs Parliament of the results;
zahteva, da ESZD v okviru postopka podelitve razrešnice za leto 2012 obvesti Parlament o rezultatih;
Takes note of the replies given to the Court of Auditors’ observations and agrees with its recommendations that steps need to be taken to ensure that staff deliver at appropriate intervals documents confirming their personal situation;
je seznanjen z odgovori na ugotovitve Računskega sodišča in se strinja s priporočili, da je treba sprejeti ukrepe, da bodo uslužbenci v ustreznih razmikih predložili dokumente, ki potrjujejo njihove osebne razmere;
notes that EEAS, together with the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO), is planning to implement a system for the timely monitoring of those documents;
ugotavlja, da namerava ESZD skupaj z uradom za vodenje in plačevanje posameznih pravic uveljaviti sistem za pravočasno spremljanje teh dokumentov;
in addition the EEAS should further improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance;
meni, da bi morala ESZD prav tako izboljšati pripravo, usklajevanje in izvajanje postopkov javnega naročanja z ustreznimi pregledi in boljšim usmerjanjem;
Regrets that according to the Court of Auditors’ observations, the risk of making incorrect or undue payments if the circumstances of staff members have changed still remains in 2012, although the EEAS has introduced a yearly update mechanism;
obžaluje, da glede na ugotovitve Računskega sodišča v letu 2012 še vedno obstaja tveganje nepravilnih ali neupravičenih izplačil, če bi se spremenile razmere uslužbencev, čeprav je ESZD uvedla mehanizem letnega posodabljanja;
calls on the EEAS to attach information on the implementation of this new mechanism in its 2012 annual activity report;
poziva ESZD, naj poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2012 priloži podatke o izvajanju novega mehanizma;
Notes that at the end of 2011, the final budget for EEAS headquarters was EUR 188000000, with an execution rate of 91 % and was EUR 276100000 for the delegations, with a lower execution rate of around 89 %;
ugotavlja, da je ob koncu leta 2011 končni proračun za sedež ESZD znašal 188000000 EUR s stopnjo izvrševanja 91 %, za delegacije pa 276100000 EUR, pri čemer je bila stopnja izvrševanja proračuna nižja, tj. približno 89 %;
takes note that the budget of the delegations had to be supplemented by the Commission to a total of EUR 252400000, having an execution rate of 85 %;
je seznanjen, da je morala proračun za delegacije dopolniti Komisija v višini 252400000 EUR s stopnjo izvrševanja 85 %;
notes also that at the end of 2012, the final execution of 2011 budget showed an execution rate of 97 % for the headquarters and 97 % for the delegations;
ugotavlja tudi, da je konec leta 2012 končna stopnja izvrševanja proračuna za leto 2011 znašala 97 % za sedež in 97 % za delegacije;
Is concerned that after an amending budget and some transfers from the Commission and within services in 2011, underspending and carrying over of appropriations continues to be quite high;
je zaskrbljen, ker je po spremembi proračuna in nekaterih prerazporeditvah s strani Komisije in znotraj služb v letu 2011 stopnja nezadostne porabe in prenosa proračunskih sredstev še vedno precej visoka;
suggests the development of key performance indicators to monitor the most critical areas in order to improve the budget execution over the coming years;
priporoča opredelitev ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti za spremljanje najbolj kritičnih področij, da bi se izvrševanje proračuna v prihodnjih letih izboljšalo;
Recalls that the EEAS is a recently created structure resulting from the consolidation of several different services and that 2011 was its first operational year with numerous technical challenges to be overcome, particularly in procurement and recruitment;
opozarja, da je ESZD struktura, ki je nastala nedavno z združitvijo različnih služb, in da je bilo leto 2011 prvo leto njenega delovanja, v katerem je bilo treba premagati številne tehnične izzive, zlasti na področju javnih naročil in zaposlovanja;
notes, furthermore, that the excessive administrative burden resulting from setting up arrangements are not likely to be repeated in subsequent years;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da se pretirana upravna obremenitev, povezana z začetkom delovanja, v prihodnjih letih verjetno ne bo ponovila;
Highly appreciates the detailed response given to a wide range of written and oral questions made by the members of Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control that went far beyond the EEAS’s administrative expenditure;
zelo ceni natančne odgovore na številna pisna in ustna vprašanja članov parlamentarnega Odbora za proračunski nadzor, ki daleč presegajo področje upravnih odhodkov ESZD;
Notes the observations on some weaknesses relating to the procurement procedure and tendering and calls on the EEAS to correct them without undue delay;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvami glede pomanjkljivosti v postopkih javnih naročil in pri razpisih, ter poziva ESZD, naj jih nemudoma odpravi;
Notes the importance of the current discharge in setting the framework for future discharge exercises and believes that it will reinforce the expectations of future developments and improvements in the effectiveness of the EEAS and its operations;
poudarja pomembno vlogo sedanje razrešnice pri vzpostavljanju okvira za prihodnje razrešnice in meni, da bo okrepila pričakovanja v zvezi s prihodnjimi dosežki in izboljšavami na področju učinkovitosti ESZD in njenih dejavnosti;
calls on the High Representative to provide a review of the organisation and functioning of the EEAS, accompanied, if necessary, by proposals for a revision of Decision 2010/427/EU by mid-2013;
poziva visoko predstavnico, naj do sredine leta 2013 pripravi pregled organizacije in delovanja ESZD ter mu po potrebi priloži predloge za revizijo Sklepa 2010/427/EU;
Believes that the discharge procedure cannot be used to make detailed comparisons of the prevailing conditions in which the EEAS has to operate across 140 locations, which range from those which are peaceful and ordered to others which are effectively war zones;
meni, da postopka razrešnice ni mogoče uporabljati za podrobne primerjave razmer na 140 lokacijah, kjer mora delovati ESZD, saj so te lahko mirne in urejene ali pa dejanska vojna območja;
finds that those locations display a wide variety of living environments;
ugotavlja, da so te lokacije najrazličnejša življenjska okolja;
Acknowledges that the challenges of budget implementation in third countries are very different from those within the Union;
kljub temu priznava, da so izzivi izvrševanja proračuna v državah nečlanicah povsem drugačni od tistih v Uniji;
asks for a clear allocation and coordination of roles and responsibilities of the Commission and the EEAS as regards programming and implementation of the budget in third countries;
zahteva jasno dodelitev in uskladitev vlog ter odgovornosti Komisije in ESZD v zvezi z načrtovanjem in izvajanjem proračuna v državah nečlanicah;
Notes the intense period of recruitment in the EEAS’s first year of operations to ensure a minimum of delay for it to be at full capacity in staffing terms;
poudarja, da je ESZD v prvem letu delovanja intenzivno zaposlovala, da bi bile zamude čim manjše in da bi bila zapolnjena vsa delovna mesta;
notes, furthermore, that there are some particular delegations where posts are harder to fill because of the level of risk in their locations;
poleg tega poudarja, da je v nekaterih delegacijah delovna mesta težje zapolniti zaradi tveganosti lokacije;
Regrets that the proportion of staff coming from the newer Member States is very low when compared to staff from the EU-15;
obžaluje, da je delež uslužbencev iz novejših držav članic zelo majhen v primerjavi z uslužbenci iz EU-15;
emphasises the need for a greater gender and, as much as possible, geographical balance in the recruitment and the appointment of staff;
poudarja, da je treba pri zaposlovanju in imenovanju uslužbencev doseči večje ravnovesje med spoloma in čim boljše geografsko ravnovesje;
urges the EEAS to develop appropriate mechanisms and to take the necessary measures to have a better and more balanced representation in due time;
poziva ESZD, naj oblikuje ustrezne mehanizme in sprejme potrebne ukrepe za boljšo in bolj uravnoteženo zastopanost;
welcomes the fact that the number of vacant posts has been decreasing;
je zadovoljen, da se je število prostih delovnih mest zmanjšalo;
urges the EEAS to use the unoccupied posts to enforce the geographical balance at all levels of staff;
poziva ESZD, naj nezasedena delovna mesta zapolni tako, da bo dosegel geografsko uravnoteženost na vseh kadrovskih ravneh;
Notes that there are directorates with 22, 27 and 29 staff members and managing directorates with 44 staff members;
ugotavlja, da obstajajo direktorati z 22, 27 in 29 uslužbenci ter upravni direktorati s 44 uslužbenci;
points out that there is a high number of management positions compared to other institutions and a relative surfeit of high-grade posts, which is seriously disproportionate in comparison with the other institutions;
opozarja, da je število vodstvenih položajev v primerjavi z drugimi institucijami veliko, prav tako pa je preveč uradnikov v najvišjih razredih, kar povzroča hudo nesorazmerje glede na druge institucije;
calls on the EEAS to clarify the reason for this and urges the High Representative to reduce this top-heavy administration;
poziva ESZD, naj pojasni vzroke za to, visoko predstavnico pa poziva, naj število najvišjih položajev v upravi zmanjša;
takes the view that the explanations the EEAS has provided thus far on this matter are partly legitimate, and calls on the relevant departments to establish, for the medium and long term, a roadmap and appropriate methods with a view to correcting this relative imbalance;
meni, da so pojasnila, ki jih je glede tega doslej podala ESZD, delno utemeljena, in poziva pristojne službe, da pripravijo srednje- in dolgoročni načrt in primerne metode za odpravo tega neravnovesja;
Reiterates its wish to see, as soon as possible, the establishment of a human resources policy that reflects the political priorities of the Union and the actual requirements on the ground;
znova izraža željo, da bi se hitro oblikovala politika človeških virov, ki bo odražala politične prednostne naloge Unije in dejanske potrebe na terenu;
points out in this connection that a concerted approach with the Commission is vital in order to optimise the profile of delegation staff [8];
glede tega opozarja, da je za optimiziranje profila uslužbencev v delegacijah nujen pristop, pripravljen v sodelovanju Komisije [8];
Calls for more transparency as regards the competences of the EEAS’s administrative structure and the reduction of dual competences;
poziva k večji preglednosti v zvezi s pristojnostmi upravne strukture ESZD in k zmanjšanju dvojnih pristojnosti;
requests the publication of the schedule of responsibilities;
zahteva objavo delitve odgovornosti;
takes the view that the inefficiency of the current situation risks seriously impairing the reputation of the EEAS;
meni, da lahko pride v sedanjih razmerah do precejšnjega upada ugleda zaradi neučinkovitosti;
Notes with satisfaction the performance and management of 8800 candidates, 1300 interviews and 118 vacancies to be filled;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je bila organizacija 1300 razgovorov za zasedbo 118 prostih delovnih mest, ki se jih je udeležilo 8800 kandidatov, učinkovita;
regrets, however, that there is no overview on how often a candidate was invited to interview and that thus the process cannot be considered as fully transparent;
vendar obžaluje, da ni povsem jasno, kolikokrat je bil posamezen kandidat povabljen na razgovor, zato ni mogoče trditi, da je postopek docela pregleden;
invites the EEAS to get a better overview on the costs of the interviews;
poziva ESZD, naj zagotovi boljši pregled nad stroški razgovorov;
Urges the newly appointed EEAS staff to give a declaration on their honour that they have not worked for intelligence services in the past;
poziva na novo imenovane uslužbence ESZD, naj podajo častno izjavo, da v preteklosti niso delali za obveščevalno službo;
Considers the responsibilities of the Union Special Representatives to be very unclear;
meni, da so odgovornosti posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije zelo nejasne;
asks to receive a discriminated note on how the budget they receive to implement their mandate is used;
poziva te predstavnike, naj jasno navedejo, kako so bila porabljena proračunska sredstva, ki so jih prejeli za izvajanje svojih nalog;
Notes that 39,5 % of Union ambassadors come from Member States;
ugotavlja, da 39,5 % veleposlanikov Unije prihaja iz držav članic;
recalls the agreement that one-third of posts should be filled by staff from Member States;
opozarja na dogovor, da morajo eno tretjino delovnih mest zasedati uslužbenci iz držav članic;
urges the High Representative implement the agreement, which means middle and senior posts are to be included in that quota;
poziva, naj visoka predstavnica ta dogovor spoštuje, kar pomeni, da je treba v ta delež vključiti srednje in visoke položaje;
Points out that there is an imbalance in delegations between staff members of the EEAS and the Commission;
poudarja, da obstaja v delegacijah neravnovesje med številom uslužbencev iz ESZD in Komisije;
urges that more EEAS staff be transferred from headquarters to delegations within the limits of the budget;
poziva, da se v mejah proračuna večje število uslužbencev ESZD preusmeri s sedeža v delegacije;
Emphasises the difficult situation faced by the delegations with the fewest members of staff as a result of the complex and rigid rules governing the delegation of payment authorisation between EEAS and Commission staff;
opozarja na neprijetno situacijo, v kateri so se znašle delegacije z najmanjšim številom uslužbencev zaradi zapletenosti in togosti pravil o prenosu pooblastila za izplačevanje med ESZD in Komisijo;
calls on the EEAS and the Commission to consider how the procedure for authorising funds might be made easier whilst ensuring that financial control rules are complied with;
obe instituciji poziva, naj preučita, kako bi bilo mogoče ta postopek za odobritev sredstev poenostaviti, ob spoštovanju pravil finančnega nadzora;
Emphasises the importance of ensuring that the operational staff, finance staff, and the monitoring and auditing staff possess the necessary skills to carry out their tasks;
poudarja, kako pomembno je zagotoviti, da bodo imeli operativni uslužbenci, uslužbenci, ki se ukvarjajo s financami, ter uslužbenci za nadzor in revizijo ustrezna znanja in veščine za izvajanje svojih nalog;
demands that the EEAS and the Commission focus their training programmes on the enhancement of those skills and report to Parliament on progress achieved;
zahteva, da ESZD in Komisija programe usposabljanja osredotočita na izboljševanje teh znanj in veščin ter Parlamentu poročata o doseženem napredku;
Draws attention to the cost-inflating procedure of the annual salary adjustment method for local staff in Union delegations;
opozarja na stroškovno neučinkovit postopek letne prilagoditve plač za lokalne uslužbence v delegacijah Unije;
believes that that methodology can be made more efficient and cost-effective;
meni, da bi bila lahko metodologija boljša in stroškovno učinkovitejša;
asks the EEAS to use calculation methods based on independent and objective selection of reference organisations in the same or similar locations;
poziva ESZD, naj uporablja metode izračuna, temelječe na neodvisni in objektivni izbiri referenčnih organizacij na isti ali podobni lokaciji;
suggests that a locally operating United Nations’ agency be added as a fixed component and that two Member State embassies and two local employers be included — with, in each case, one to be determined by the employee and one by the employer — in order to obtain an appropriate average;
priporoča, da se kot fiksna komponenta doda agencija Združenih narodov, dejavna na lokaciji, pa tudi dve veleposlaništvi držav članic in dva lokalna delodajalca, pri čemer enega izbere delojemalec, drugega pa delodajalec, da bi dobili primerno povprečje;
urges that a mechanism be established to relieve the Union ambassador of his responsibility for salary negotiations with local staff and for the reference organisations to be chosen for a period of five years;
poziva k vzpostavitvi mehanizma, ki bo veleposlanika Unije razbremenil odgovornosti za pogajanja o plačah z lokalnimi uslužbenci, ter k določitvi referenčnih organizacij za petletno obdobje;
Expresses its concern over the high rate of absence in Union delegations and suggests that the EEAS re-examine the reasons behind such absences;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pogostih odsotnosti z dela v delegacijah Unije in predlaga, naj ESZD razloge zanje znova razišče;
urges the EEAS to correct the imbalances based on the results of the exam and to provide Parliament with figures of absenteeism on an annual basis;
poziva ESZD, naj na podlagi ugotovitev odpravi neravnovesja in Parlamentu vsako leto poroča o številu izostankov;
suggests the reconsideration of such procedures in the context that the delegation staff combine their periods of professional training in Brussels with their rest leave as much as possible;
predlaga, da se ponovno razmisli o postopkih glede tega, da bi uslužbenci delegacij obdobja poklicnega usposabljanja v Bruslju združili s preostalo odsotnostjo;
invites the Commission, when revising Annex X to the Staff Regulations (third countries), to bring leave entitlements and other locally non-working days of staff in delegations into line with other diplomatic representations there;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri reviziji priloge X kadrovskih predpisov (države nečlanice) število dni dopusta in lokalne dela proste dni uslužbencev v delegacijah uskladi z drugimi tamkajšnjimi diplomatskimi predstavništvi;
Expresses concern about the administrative shortcomings in the Union delegations in Afghanistan, Djibouti, Guyana, Solomon Islands and Zambia;
je zaskrbljen zaradi upravnih pomanjkljivosti v delegacijah Unije v Afganistanu, Džibutiju, Gvajani, na Salomonovih otokih in v Zambiji;
asks for a report on the state of play about those shortcomings including security contracts;
želi prejeti poročilo o trenutnem stanju glede teh pomanjkljivosti, vključno s pogodbami o varnostnih storitvah;
expects also a report on the situation about internal control standards in the Union delegations in Liberia and Iraq;
pričakuje tudi poročilo o stanju na področju standardov notranje kontrole v delegacijah Unije v Liberiji in Iraku;
asks for a state of play about compliance rates of the Union delegations in Egypt and Malawi and for an update on security contracts in the Union delegations in the West Bank, Haiti, Saudi-Arabia, Pakistan, Sri-Lanka, Libya and Lebanon;
zahteva informacije o trenutnem stanju glede stopnje skladnosti v delegacijah Unije v Egiptu in Malaviju ter najnovejše podatke o pogodbah o varnostnih storitvah v delegacijah Unije na Zahodnem bregu, Haitiju, v Saudovi Arabiji, Pakistanu, Šrilanki, Libiji in Libanonu;
Asks for clarification as to why a security company under contract with the Union delegation to Afghanistan, subject to OLAF investigation, has recently been awarded a new contract of about EUR 50 million in the same delegation;
zahteva pojasnilo o tem, zakaj je varnostno podjetje, ki ima pogodbo z delegacijo Unije v Afganistanu in ga je preiskoval urad OLAF, pred kratkim od iste delegacije prejelo novo pogodbo v vrednosti približno 50 milijonov EUR;
Notes with satisfaction that synergies with the Commission’s Directorate-General for Development and Cooperation — EuropeAid and the national diplomacies are well functioning and invites the EEAS to keep Parliament informed;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da sinergije z generalnim direktoratom Komisije za razvoj in sodelovanje – EuropeAid in nacionalnimi diplomatskimi službami dobro delujejo, ter poziva ESZD, naj redno obvešča Parlament;
accepts that there is still work to be done in relation to the consular services;
priznava, da so na področju konzularnih storitev potrebna dodatna prizadevanja;
asks that Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs be engaged in that exercise;
poziva Odbor za zunanje zadeve Parlamenta, naj se vključi v ta proces;
Calls on the EEAS to forward its staff screening report to Parliament;
poziva ESZD, naj Parlamentu posreduje poročilo o pregledu delovnih mest;
Urges the EEAS to maximise the benefits of economies of scale by creating new synergies within the EEAS headquarters and delegations as well as in cooperation with Member States and national diplomatic services, in the spirit of a true Union external policy and services;
poziva ESZD, naj čim bolje izkoristi prednosti ekonomije obsega z iskanjem novih sinergij na svojem sedežu in tudi v delegacijah, pa tudi v sodelovanju z državami članicami in nacionalnimi diplomatskimi službami, v duhu resnične zunanje politike in služb Unije;
emphasises the need, in that respect, to seek, as much as possible, the co-location of services in third countries, for the sake of enhanced exchange of information and savings;
glede tega poudarja, da je treba v čim večji meri izkoristiti skupne lokacije za storitve v državah nečlanicah, da bi dosegli boljšo izmenjavo informacij in večje prihranke;
In the context of the forthcoming entry into force of the EU-Central America Association Agreement, emphasises the need for the Union to have a delegation in Panama, an important partner and the only country in the region without such a delegation;
glede na bližnji začetek veljavnosti pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Srednjo Ameriko poudarja, da Unija potrebuje delegacijo v Panami, ki je pomembna partnerica in edina država v tej regiji brez delegacije;
calls on the EEAS to take action to this end as soon as possible;
poziva ESZD, naj glede tega čim prej ukrepa;
Insists on an explanation for the recall of the Union ambassador to Libya;
še zmeraj zahteva razlago za odpoklic veleposlanika Unije v Libiji;
Requests that the EEAS submit all information on the Service Level Agreements established with the Council and the Commission respectively;
zahteva, da ESZD posreduje vse informacije o sporazumih o opravljanju storitev, sklenjenih s Svetom in Komisijo;
Welcomes the fact that the revised Financial Regulation obliges the EEAS to provide a working document on its building policy to the Parliament by 1 June each year;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da spremenjena finančna uredba ESZD obvezuje, da Parlamentu do 1. junija vsako leto posreduje delovni dokument o nepremičninski politiki;
stresses that the revised Financial Regulation allows the EEAS to take loans for the acquisition of its offices and residences;
poudarja, da spremenjena finančna uredba ESZD omogoča najemanje posojil za nakup pisarn in stanovanj;
urges the EEAS to maintain cost effective operation and to find appropriate financing solutions consulting the Commission’s Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs;
poziva ESZD, naj še naprej deluje stroškovno učinkovito in v posvetovanju z generalnim direktoratom Komisije za ekonomske in finančne zadeve poišče ustrezne rešitve za financiranje;
Is concerned over the increasing rental costs of the EEAS’s offices and residences (i.e. an increase of over 50 % of the Moscow offices of the Union delegation to Russia from year 2010 to 2011);
je zaskrbljen zaradi čedalje višjih najemnin za pisarne in stanovanja ESZD (npr. več kot 50-odstotno povišanje za pisarne delegacije Unije v Rusiji (Moskva) v obdobju 2010–2011);
urges the EEAS to maintain cost effective operation and to provide all the necessary information to the discharge authority;
poziva ESZD, naj še naprej deluje stroškovno učinkovito, organu za podelitev razrešnice pa posreduje vse potrebne informacije;