natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest, OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p. 67.
Odločba Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str. 67.
Commission Decision of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest, OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3.
Sklep Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2011 o uporabi člena 106(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljenega nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, UL L 7, 11.1.2012, str. 3.
See the judgment of the Court of 28 April 1993, C-364/90, Italy v Commission, [1993] ECR. I-02097, point 20.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 28. aprila 1993, C-364/90, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-02097, točka 20.
See paragraphs 37 and 38 above.
Glej uvodni izjavi 37 in 38 zgoraj.
See footnote 33 above and paragraph 54 of the opening decision.
Glej opombo 33 zgoraj in uvodno izjavo 54 sklepa o začetku postopka.
On the Marseille-Ajaccio, Marseille-Propriano and Marseille-Porto Vecchio lines. Source: report from the Public Service Delegation Committee.
Kar zadeva linije Marseille-Ajaccio, Marseille-Propriano in Marseille Porto-Vecchio, vir: poročilo komisije o prenosu pooblastil javne službe.
For example, SNCM's total net revenue in 2005 for its public service activities was EUR 80,3 million, compared to forecast revenue of EUR 85,5 million in 2008.
Skupni neto prihodek SNCM leta 2005 za dejavnosti na podlagi PPJS je bil na primer 80,3 milijona EUR, prihodki, predvideni za leto 2008, pa znašajo 85,5 milijona EUR.
See paragraphs 38 and 39 above, and paragraph 53 of the opening decision.
Glej uvodni izjavi 38 in 39 zgoraj in uvodno izjavo 53 sklepa o začetku postopka.
See judgment of 12 February 2008, Case T-289/03, BUPA v Commission, [2008] ECR II-81, point 217.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 12. februarja 2008, T-289/03, BUPA proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. II-81, točka 217.
See Commission Communication C(2004) 43 - Community guidelines on State aid to maritime transport, Section 9, paragraph 3.
Glej Sporočilo Komisije C(2004) 43 – Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za pomorski prevoz, oddelek 9, odstavek 3.
The market value of each vessel is recorded on a pro rata basis according to use for the DSP.
Tržna vrednost vsake ladje se izračuna sorazmerno glede na njeno uporabo v okviru PPJS.
This duration, although short in relation to the economic life of a ship (which can exceed 20 years), is justified to the extent that (1) the specifications imposed a maximum age of 20 years, and (2) the average age of CMN's vessels was over 13 years old and that of SNCM's ships was 12, limiting de facto their economic life in the absence of major maintenance investments.
To trajanje, ki je sicer kratko v primerjavi z življenjsko dobo ladje (ki lahko presega 20 let), je upravičeno, saj (1) pogodbeni pogoji določajo, da je najvišja dovoljena starost ladij 20 let, ter (2) je povprečna starost ladij CMN več kot 13 let in povprečna starost ladij SNCM 12 let, kar pomeni, da bi bilo trajanje njihove življenjske dobe dejansko omejeno, če se ne bi zagotovile naložbe za večje vzdrževanje.
Indeed, the value of the vessels used for the DSP constitutes a lower limit for the assets of the shipping company.
Vrednost ladij, uporabljenih v okviru PPJS, je spodnja meja sredstev pomorske družbe.
See paragraph 37 of the SGEI Framework, in which the Commission indicates a rate of 100 basis points above the applicable swap rate (same currency, same maturity) as constituting a reasonable profit regardless of the level of commercial risk actually borne by the SGEI provider.
Glej odstavek 37 Okvira SSGP, v katerem Komisija navaja, da stopnja 100 bazičnih točk nad veljavno menjalno obrestno mero (ista valuta, ista zapadlost) pomeni razumen dobiček, ne glede na raven poslovnega tveganja, ki jo dejansko nosi izvajalec SSGP.
In the absence of an available swap rate for a maturity of six and a half years, the Commission has used a maturity swap rate of seven years as an indicator.
Glede na to, da menjalne obrestne mere z ročnostjo šest let in pol niso na voljo, je Komisija kot merilo uporabila menjalno obrestno mero z ročnostjo 7 let.
The daily closing values of the rate during the months preceding the award of the DSP ranged from 4,4 % to 4,7 % (source: Bloomberg).
Konec trgovalnega dne je ta obrestna mera v mesecu pred dodelitvijo koncesijske pogodbe znašala med 4,4 % in 4,7 % (vir: Bloomberg).
Information covered by professional secrecy.
Zaupen podatek.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
See Section 2.5.
Glej oddelek 2.5.
This amount has been estimated on the basis of the analytical division between compensation for the basic service and the additional service for 2011, based on a projected increase in compensation of 0,3 % in 2012 compared to 2011 for SNCM.
Ta znesek je ob upoštevanju analitične razdelitve nadomestil za osnovno in dodatno storitev za leto 2011 ocenjen na podlagi povišanja napovedanega nadomestila za 0,3 % leta 2012 v primerjavi z letom 2011 za SNCM.
The monthly payments represent 95 % of the forecast indexed compensation (see paragraph 45 above).
Mesečni obroki znašajo 95 % predvidenega indeksiranega nadomestila (glej uvodno izjavo 45 zgoraj).
See Article 14(2) of Regulation No 659/99 (above).
Glej člen 14(2) Uredbe št. 659/99 (navedena zgoraj).
OJ L 82, 25.3.2008, pp. 1–64.
UL L 82, 25.4.2008, str. 1–64.
The contract concerns the shipping routes between Corsica and Marseille during the period 2007-2013.
Ta pogodba (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pogodba o PPJS) zadeva pomorske povezave med Korziko in Marseillem v obdobju 2007–2013.
By letters dated 20 May 2010, 16 July 2010, 22 March 2011, 22 June 2011, 15 December 2011 and 10 January 2012 the complainant sent additional information in support of its complaint.
Pritožnik je dopisih z dne 20. maja 2010, 16. julija 2010, 22. marca 2011, 22. junija 2011, 15. decembra 2011 in 10. januarja 2012 predložil dodatne informacije v podporo svoji pritožbi.
On 24 January 2008, Bastia Administrative Court rejected Corsica Ferries' application for the annulment of the two decisions of 7 June 2007.
Upravno sodišče v Bastii je 24. januarja 2008 zavrnilo zahtevek družbe Corsica Ferries za razveljavitev sklepov z dne 7. junija 2007.
On 7 November 2011 the Marseille Administrative Court of Appeal subsequently annulled the Bastia Administrative Court ruling of 24 January 2008 and the two decisions of 7 June 2007.
Prizivno upravno sodišče v Marseillu je nato 7. novembra 2011 razveljavilo sodbo upravnega sodišča v Bastii z dne 24. januarja 2008 ter sklepa z dne 7. junija 2007.
The public service delegation contract was signed for the period from 1 July 2007 to 31 December 2013.
Pogodba o PPJS je bila podpisana za obdobje od 1. julija 2007 do 31. decembra 2013. V členu 1 je kot predmet pogodbe o PPJS določeno zagotavljanje rednih pomorskih storitev na vseh linijah v okviru prenosa pooblastil javne službe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PPJS) med pristaniščem v Marseillu in naslednjimi pristanišči: Bastia, Ajaccio, Porto-Vecchio, Propriano in Balagne.
Article 1 defines the purpose of the public service delegation contract as the provision of scheduled maritime transport services on all lines of the public service delegation between the port of Marseille and the ports of Bastia, Ajaccio, Porto Vecchio and Propriano-Balagne.
S pogodbenimi pogoji iz Priloge 1 k pogodbi o PPJS je določena vrsta teh storitev.
Under the adaptation clause, the public service delegation contract was amended by a supplementary contract on 28 December 2009.
V skladu s prilagoditveno klavzulo je bila pogodba o prenosu pooblastil javne službe spremenjena z dopolnilno pogodbo 28. decembra 2009.
This amendment led to the cancellation of 108 crossings a year between Corsica and Marseille.
Zaradi te spremembe je bilo med Marseillem in Korziko ukinjenih 108 prevozov na leto.
€ million
V tisoč EUR
Departure between 6 pm and 8 pm
odhod med 18.00 in 20.00 uro
Arrival between 6 am and 8 am
Prihod med 6.00 in 8.00 uro
Finally, SNCM notes that its service offering was set in 2007.
Na koncu SNCM opozarja, da je svojo ponudbo določil leta 2007.
Thus, the lower requirements of the Corsican Transport Board in 2009 relate primarily to the economic crisis as well as to the investments made by Corsica Ferries.
Tako bi bilo zmanjšanje zahtev OTC leta 2009 povezano predvsem z gospodarsko krizo in naložbami, ki jih je zagotovila družba Corsica Ferries.
A substantial degree of substitutability of the services [90] operated from the ports of Marseille and Toulon could therefore be seen in quantitative terms from 2006, on the basis of shifts of traffic to Toulon during strikes that seriously disrupted services from Marseille in late 2005 [91].
Znatno stopnjo zamenljivosti storitev prevoza [90] iz pristanišč v Marseillu in Toulonu je mogoče od leta 2006 količinsko dokazati na podlagi prenosa prometa v Toulon med stavkami konec leta 2005, ki so resno škodovale storitvam prevoza iz Marseilla [91].
Thus, even taking into account the impact of the upward trend in traffic from Toulon [92], levels of transfer of traffic from Marseille to Toulon [93] observed on the lines to Ajaccio were of the order of 89 % [94] for September-October 2005.
Tako so tudi ob upoštevanju vpliva splošnega porasta prometa iz Toulona [92] ravni prenosa prometa iz Marseilla v Toulon [93] na linijah do Ajaccia septembra in oktobra 2005 znašale 89 % [94].
In fact, the only bid that was in competition with that of the joint concession holders was not evaluated on its own merits (award criteria), but on the basis of one selection criterion, which in this case was the tenderer's ability to operate from 1 July 2007.
Dejansko edina ponudba, ki je bila konkurenčna ponudbi pooblaščenih soizvajalcev, ni bila ovrednotena na podlagi svojih značilnosti (merila dodelitve), ampak na podlagi merila za izbor, v tem primeru sposobnosti ponudnika, da opravlja storitve od 1. julija 2007.
The procedure therefore did not allow the Corsican Transport Board to compare several offers and to select the most economically advantageous.
Postopek torej uradu OTC ni omogočil, da bi primerjal več ponudb in izbral ekonomsko najustreznejšo ponudbo.
Indeed, in this case, the Corsica Ferries bid set 12 November 2007 as the date for the start of service, while the specifications required the services to be provided from 1 July 2007 [105].
Dejansko je bilo v tem primeru v ponudbi družbe Corsica Ferries določeno, da bo storitve začela opravljati 12. novembra 2007, medtem ko so pogodbeni pogoji določali izvajanje storitev od 1. julija 2007 [105].
Furthermore, contrary to the argument put forward by the French authorities, the Commission does not consider multiple litigation as evidence in favour of the effectiveness of competition in the procurement procedure for the public service delegation contract.
Poleg tega v nasprotju s trditvami francoskih organov Komisija meni, da dejstva, da je bilo vloženih več tožb, ni mogoče šteti kot dokaz učinkovite konkurence v okviru postopka oddaje javnega naročila za pogodbo o PPJS.
Following further restructuring measures, the Commission extended procedure C 58/2002 by a decision of 13 September 2006.
Po sprejetju novih ukrepov za prestrukturiranje je Komisija postopek C 58/2002 razširila z Odločbo z dne 13. septembra 2006.
The Commission adopted a new decision on 8 July 2008, OJ L 255, 27.8.2009, p. 180.
Komisija je novo Odločbo sprejela 8. julija 2008, UL L 255, 27.8.2009, str. 180.
The correction (at 2007 values) from 2010 to 2013 led to a reduction in the annual amounts of the reference financial compensation of EUR 6,5 million for the two concession holders. The revised amounts of compensation and forecast revenue are set out in Tables 7 and 8 of the opening decision.
Kar zadeva referenčna finančna nadomestila, je bil v obdobju od leta 2010 do leta 2013 izveden popravek (vrednost za leto 2007), v skladu s katerim so se letni zneski za oba pooblaščena izvajalca znižali za 6,5 milijona EUR. Revidirani zneski nadomestil in predvidenih prihodkov so navedeni v tabelah št.o7 in 8 sklepa o začetku postopka.
The specifications contained in Annex 1 of the public service delegation contract define the nature of these services. In particular, it distinguishes between:
Pri tem se razlikuje zlasti med:
amending Decision 2007/777/EC as regards the introduction of a new treatment to inactivate foot-and-mouth disease virus in meat products and the import conditions from the Russian region of Kaliningrad
o spremembi Odločbe 2007/777/ES glede uvedbe nove obdelave za inaktivacijo virusa slinavke in parkljevke v mesnih izdelkih ter uvoznih pogojih za te izdelke iz ruske regije Kaliningrad
(notified under document C(2013) 4970)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 4970)
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [1], and in particular points 1, 4 and 5 of Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [1], in zlasti točk 1, 4 in 5 člena 8 Direktive,
Commission Decision 2007/777/EC of 29 November 2007 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of certain meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decision 2005/432/EC [2] lays down rules on imports into the Union and transits through and storage in the Union of consignments of meat products and consignments of treated stomachs, bladders and intestines, as defined in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin [3].
Odločba Komisije 2007/777/ES z dne 29. novembra 2007 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali in javnozdravstvenim varstvom ter vzorcih spričeval za uvoz iz tretjih držav nekaterih mesnih izdelkov in obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev za prehrano ljudi in o razveljavitvi Odločbe 2005/432/ES [2] določa pravila za uvoz v Unijo pošiljk mesnih izdelkov ter pošiljk obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev ter njihov tranzit in skladiščenje v Uniji, kakor so opredeljena v Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora [3].
These are the treatments listed in Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC which are considered effective in eliminating certain animal health risks linked to meat and milk.
To so obdelave, navedene v Prilogi III k Direktivi 2002/99/ES, ki se štejejo za učinkovite za uničenje nekaterih povzročiteljev živalskih bolezni v mesu in mleku.
Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC has been recently amended by Commission Implementing Decision 2013/417/EU [4] in order to introduce a treatment effective against foot-and-mouth disease virus in meat recommended in the relevant chapter of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE Terrestrial Code) [5].
Priloga III k Direktivi 2002/99/ES je bila nedavno spremenjena z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2013/417/EU [4], da se uvede učinkovita obdelava proti virusu slinavke in parkljevke v mesu, ki je priporočena v ustreznem poglavju Zoosanitarnega kodeksa za kopenske živali Mednarodne organizacije za zdravje živali (Kodeks za kopenske živali OIE) [5].
It is therefore opportune to amend Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC in order to reflect that amendment to Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
Zato je primerno spremeniti del 4 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES, da bo razvidna sprememba Priloge III k Direktivi 2002/99/ES.
Russia has asked to authorise import into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines from domestic bovine, farmed cloven-hoofed game and domestic ovine and caprine animals from the Russian region of Kaliningrad which have undergone the abovementioned treatment provided for in the OIE Terrestrial Code.
Rusija je zaprosila, da se dovoli uvoz v Unijo mesnih izdelkov in obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev iz domačega goveda, gojene parkljaste divjadi in domačih ovc in koz iz ruske regije Kaliningrad, ki so bili obdelani z zgoraj navedeno obdelavo, določeno v Kodeksu za kopenske živali OIE.
That treatment has been now introduced by Implementing Decision 2013/417/EU into Union legislation.
Navedena obdelava je bila zdaj uvedena z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/417/EU v zakonodajo Unije.
The Russian region of Kaliningrad is currently listed in Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC as authorised for the introduction into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines from domestic bovine animals, farmed cloven-hoofed game, domestic ovine or caprine animals and domestic porcine animals and wild cloven-hoofed game which have undergone the specific treatment ‘C’.
Ruska regija Kaliningrad je trenutno vključena na seznam v delu 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES kot regija, ki ima dovoljenje za uvoz v Unijo mesnih izdelkov in obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev iz domačega goveda, gojene parkljaste divjadi, domačih ovc ali koz, domačih prašičev in divje parkljaste divjadi, ki so bili obdelani s posebno obdelavo „C“.
Taking into account the animal health situation in the Russian region of Kaliningrad, it is appropriate to authorise imports from that region into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines from domestic bovine, farmed cloven-hoofed game and domestic ovine and caprine animals which have undergone the specific treatment introduced in Annex III to Directive 2002/99/EC.
Ob upoštevanju zdravstvenega stanja živali v ruski regiji Kaliningrad je primerno dovoliti uvoz iz navedene regije v Unijo mesnih izdelkov in obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev iz domačega goveda, gojene parkljaste divjadi in domačih ovc in koz, ki so bili obdelani s posebno obdelavo iz Priloge III k Direktivi 2002/99/ES.
It is therefore appropriate to authorise such imports into the Union from the Russian region of Kaliningrad and therefore amend accordingly the entries for that region in Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC.
Zato je primerno odobriti tak uvoz v Unijo iz ruske regije Kaliningrad in zato ustrezno spremeniti vnose za navedeno regijo v delu 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Ta slep je naslovljen na države članice.
OJ L 206, 2.8.2013, p. 13.
UL L 206, 2.8.2013, str. 13.
in Part 2, the entry for Russia is replaced by the following:
v delu 2 se vnos za Rusijo nadomesti z naslednjim:
C or D1
C ali D1
in Part 4, after the entry for meat treatment D, the following entry for meat treatment D1 is inserted:
v delu 4 se za vnosom, ki se nanaša na obdelavo mesa „D“, vstavi naslednji vnos za obdelavo mesa „D1“:
Thorough cooking of meat, previously deboned and defatted, subjected to heating so that an internal temperature of 70 °C or greater is maintained for a minimum of 30 minutes.’.
Temeljito kuhanje mesa, ki je bilo pred tem izkoščeno, razmaščeno, toplotno obdelano, tako da je bila notranja temperatura mesa vsaj 30 minut najmanj 70 °C.“
of 14 August 2013
z dne 14. avgusta 2013
amending Decision 2010/642/EU authorising a method for grading pig carcases in Greece and repealing Decision 89/449/EEC authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Greece
o spremembi Sklepa 2010/642/EU o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Grčiji in razveljavitvi Odločbe 89/449/EGS o odobritvi metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Grčiji
(notified under document C(2013) 5302)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 5302)
By Commission Decision 89/449/EEC [2], the use of three methods for grading pig carcases in Greece was authorised.
Z Odločbo Komisije 89/449/EGS [2] je bila odobrena uporaba treh metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Grčiji.
Greece has informed the Commission that since the adoption of that Decision the grading methods have evolved considerably and changes in the pig population were recorded.
Grčija je Komisijo obvestila, da so se od sprejetja navedene odločbe metode za razvrščanje močno spremenile, evidentirane pa so bile tudi spremembe v populaciji prašičev.
Therefore the three methods authorised by that Decision cannot be used anymore.
Zato tri metode, ki jih je odobrila Odločba, niso več uporabne.
By Commission Decision 2010/642/EU [3], the use of one method for grading dehided pig carcases in Greece was authorised.
S Sklepom Komisije 2010/642/EU [3] je bila odobrena uporaba ene metode za razvrščanje odrtih prašičjih trupov v Grčiji.
Greece has elaborated two new, up-to-date grading methods and has requested the Commission to authorise those two new methods for grading pig carcases on its territory and has presented a detailed description of the dissection trial, indicating the principles on which those methods are based, the results of its dissection trial and the equations used for assessing the percentage of lean meat in the protocol provided for in Article 23(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 [4].
Grčija je razvila dve novi, sodobni metodi za razvrščanje in je Komisijo prosila, da odobri ti dve metodi za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na njenem ozemlju, ter v protokolu v skladu s členom 23(4) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1249/2008 [4] predložila podroben opis preskusa z razkosanjem in navedla načela, na katerih temeljijo metode, rezultate preskusa z razkosanjem in enačbo za ocenjevanje odstotka pustega mesa.
Those grading methods should therefore be authorised in Greece.
Zato bi bilo treba navedene metode za razvrščanje v Grčiji odobriti.
Decision 2010/642/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Sklep 2010/642/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decision 89/449/EEC should be repealed.
Odločbo 89/449/EGS bi bilo treba razveljaviti.
Decision 2010/642/EU is amended as follows:
Sklep 2010/642/EU se spremeni:
For grading pig carcases presented in accordance with the first paragraph of point B.III of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 the use of the following method is authorised in Greece, pursuant to paragraph 1 of point B.IV of that Annex: the “OptiScan-TP” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part I of the Annex to this Decision.
Za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov, predstavljenih v skladu s prvim odstavkom točke B.III Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007, se v Grčiji odobri uporaba naslednje metode v skladu z odstavkom 1 točke B.IV navedene priloge: naprava ‚OptiScan-TP‘ in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu I Priloge k temu sklepu.
For grading dehided pig carcases the use of the following methods is authorised in Greece pursuant to paragraph 1 of point B.IV of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007:
Za razvrščanje odrtih prašičjih trupov se v Grčiji v skladu z odstavkom 1 točke B.IV Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007 odobri uporaba naslednjih metod:
the “OptiScan-TP” apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part I of the Annex to this Decision;
naprava ‚OptiScan-TP‘ in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu I Priloge k temu sklepu;