natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
reports issued by the United Kingdom Renewable Fuels Agency for the imports in the United Kingdom; extractions of customs import detailed database provided by the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland and by Eurostat.
poročil, ki jih je v zvezi z uvozi v Združeno kraljestvo objavila Agencija Združenega kraljestva za obnovljiva goriva, in izvlečki iz zbirke podrobnih podatkov o carini pri uvozu, ki so jih predložile Nizozemska, Švedska in Finska ter Eurostat.
The percentage of bioethanol used for fuel in the Union was 54 % in 2008, 66 % in 2009, and 68 % in 2010.
Odstotek bioetanola, uporabljenega za gorivo v Uniji, je bil 54 % leta 2008, 66 % leta 2009 in 68 % leta 2010.
For the IP, the percentage of 2010 was used for the purpose of estimating the relevant imports made during the IP.
V OP je bil pri oceni zadevnega uvoza v OP uporabljen odstotek za leto 2010.
This led to positive developments in particular for the above injury factors especially in the period up to 2010.
To je povzročilo napredek, zlasti v zvezi z navedenimi škodnimi dejavniki in zlasti v obdobju do leta 2010.
But the situation in the Union market changed in coincidence with the surge of US dumped imports in 2010 and the growth in activity expected during the IP did not materialise.
Vendar se je položaj na trgu Unije z istočasnim povečanjem dampinškega uvoza iz ZDA leta 2010 spremenil, pri čemer v OP ni prišlo do pričakovane rasti dejavnosti.
Cash flow was negative in 2008 and improved in 2009 and 2010.
Denarni tok je bil v letu 2008 negativen, pri čemer se je v letih 2009 in 2010 izboljšal.
During the IP, however, cash flow started to decrease again, reflecting a worsening in the Union industry’s ability to self-finance its activities.
Vendar je začel denarni tok v OP ponovno upadati, kar je izražalo vedno slabšo sposobnost industrije Unije, da bi sama financirala svoje dejavnosti.
Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the investigation showed that any alleged low level of the Union production was mainly justified by a low level of sales prices in the Union market which was largely affected by the surge of low-priced US dumped imports undercutting the Union producers’ prices, in particular during the IP.
Vendar bi bilo treba poudariti, da je preiskava pokazala, da je razlog za kakršno koli domnevno nizko raven proizvodnje Unije nizka raven prodajnih cen na trgu Unije, na kar je v veliki meri vplivalo nenadno povečanje nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza iz ZDA, ki je nelojalno zniževal cene proizvajalcev Unije zlasti v OP.
It appeared that EU producers had no other choice than stopping production as prices did not even allow them to cover the cost of the raw material in particular during the IP.
Zdelo se je, da proizvajalci EU razen zaustavitve proizvodnje niso imeli druge izbire, saj jim cene zlasti v OP niso omogočale niti kritja stroškov surovin.
Congress gave the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the responsibility to coordinate with the US Department of Energy, the US Department of Agriculture, and stakeholders to design and implement this program.
Kongres Združenih držav je Agencijo Združenih držav za varstvo okolja (EPA) pooblastil za oblikovanje in izvajanje navedenega programa v sodelovanju z Ministrstvom Združenih držav za energetiko, Ministrstvom Združenih držav za kmetijstvo in zainteresiranimi stranmi.
For instance: (a) the information published by the American Coalition for Ethanol (ACE) on the web; (b) the Energy Policy Act (EPA) of 2005, in particular P.L.
Na primer (a) informacije, ki jih je v internetu objavila Ameriška koalicija za etanol (American Coalition for Ethanol – ACE), (b) Zakon o energetski politiki (Energy Policy Act – EPA) iz leta 2005, zlasti P.L.
109-58; (c) the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-140, H.R.6) which amended and increased the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) requiring 9 billion gallons of renewable fuels use in 2008 and 13,9 billion gallons in 2011; (d) fact sheets issued by the US Department of Energy under the Clean cities actions etc.
109–158, (c) Zakon o energetski neodvisnosti in varnosti (Energy Independance and Security Act) iz leta 2007 (P.L. 110–140, H.R.6), na podlagi katerega je bil spremenjen standard o obnovljivih gorivih (RFS), pri čemer je bila vanj vključena zahteva, da se leta 2008 porabi 9 milijard galon obnovljivih goriv, leta 2011 pa 13,9 milijard galon, (d) seznami, ki jih je v okviru ukrepov za čista mesta izdalo Ministrstvo Združenih držav za energijo, itd.
market report, (B) Eurostat, the US International Trade Commission, the UK Renewable Fuels Agency and customs import database provided by the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland; (C) complaint, questionnaire replies from the sampled Union producers, Union industry information provided in the complaint.
tržno poročilo, (B) Eurostat, Komisija Združenih držav za mednarodno trgovino, Agencija Združenega kraljestva za obnovljiva goriva in zbirke podatkov o carini pri uvozu, ki so jih predložile Nizozemska, Švedska in Finska, (C) pritožba, odgovori na vprašalnike, ki so jih predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, podatki o industriji Unije, navedeni v pritožbi.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 158/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 158/2013
reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China
o ponovni uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
On 20 October 2007 the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) [2].
Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 20. oktobra 2007 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK) [2] v Skupnost.
On 4 July 2008, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 642/2008 [3] (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 4. julija 2008 z Uredbo (ES) št. 642/2008 [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasna uredba) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov s poreklom iz LRK.
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 6 September 2007 by the Spanish National Federation of Associations of Processed Fruit and Vegetables (‘FENAVAL’, previously named ‘FNACV’) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing 100 % of the total Community production of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins etc.).
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 6. septembra 2007 španska Nacionalna zveza združenj za predelano sadje in zelenjavo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: FENAVAL, prej imenovana FNACV) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) vložila v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo 100-odstotni delež celotne proizvodnje nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) v Skupnosti.
As set out in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2006 do 30. septembra 2007 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 October 2002 to the end of the investigation period (‘period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2002 do konca obdobja preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
On 9 November 2007, the Commission made imports of the same product originating in the PRC subject to registration by Regulation (EC) No 1295/2007 of 5 November 2007 making imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China subject to registration [4] (‘Registration Regulation’).
Komisija je 9. novembra 2007 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1295/2007 z dne 5. novembra o registraciji uvoza nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o registraciji) uvedla registracijo za uvoz istega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK.
It is recalled that safeguard measures were in force against the same product until 8 November 2007.
Spomniti je treba, da so za isti izdelek do 8. novembra 2007 veljali zaščitni ukrepi.
Definitive safeguard measures followed by Regulation (EC) No 658/2004 [6] (‘the safeguard Regulation’).
Dokončni zaščitni ukrepi so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 658/2004 [6] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o zaščitnih ukrepih).
By Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 [7] (‘the original Regulation’) the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1355/2008 [7] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna uredba) uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (zlasti mandarin itd.) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The range of the definitive anti-dumping duty was between 361,4 and 531,2 EUR/tonne net product weight.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev je znašala od 361,4 do 531,2 EUR/tono neto mase izdelka.
Xinshiji judgment
Sodba v zadevi Xinshiji
By judgment of 17 February 2011 in Case T-122/09 — Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union supported by European Commission [8] — (‘the Xinshiji judgment’) the General Court annulled the original Regulation in so far as it concerns the applicants Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co., Ltd and Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd
Splošno sodišče je s sodbo z dne 17. februarja 2011 v zadevi T-122/09 - Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd in Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd proti Svetu Evropske unije ob podpori Evropske Komisije [8] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodba Xinshiji) razglasilo prvotno uredbo za nično v delu, v katerem se nanaša na tožeči stranki, Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co., Ltd. in Hubei Xinshiji Foods Co. Ltd.
The General Court’s judgment was based on the grounds that the Commission breached the rights of defence by not providing the information necessary for the applicants to determine whether, in the light of the structure of the market, the adjustment of export price to the ex-works level of the importer was appropriate in that it made it possible to compare the export price and the Union industry price at the same level of trade.
Splošno sodišče je sodbo utemeljilo na ugotovitvi, da je Komisija kršila pravico do obrambe, ker ni zagotovila informacij, ki sta jih tožeči stranki potrebovali, da bi ugotovili, ali je bila glede na strukturo trga prilagoditev izvozne cene ceni uvoznika na ravni franko tovarna primerna za primerjavo izvozne cene in prodajne cene industrije Unije na isti ravni trgovine.
The General Court also considered that the Commission infringed the duty to state reasons as the reasons for a measure must appear in the actual body of the measure and may not be stated in written or oral explanations given subsequently when the measure is already the subject of proceeding brought before the European Union Courts.
Splošno sodišče je tudi menilo, da je Komisija kršila obveznost navedbe razlogov, ker morajo biti razlogi navedeni v dejanskem besedilu ukrepa in ne v naknadnih pisnih ali ustnih pojasnilih, ko je ukrep že predmet postopka na sodiščih Evropske unije.
In April 2011 the Commission lodged an appeal (C-195/11 P) seeking to set aside the Xinshiji judgment.
Komisija je Aprila 2011 vložila pritožbo (C-195/11P), v kateri je zahtevala razveljavitev sodbe Xinshiji.
Following the declaration of invalidity of the original Regulation by the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court’) on 22 March 2012 (see recital 16 below), the Commission withdrew its appeal as it became without object.
Potem, ko je Sodišče Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sodišče) 22. marca 2012 (glej uvodno izjavo 16) razglasilo prvotno uredbo za nično, je Komisija pritožbo umaknila, ker je postala brezpredmetna.
On 3 December 2011 the Commission published a notice [9] partially reopening the anti-dumping investigation (‘the first reopening Notice’) in order to implement the General Court’s Xinshiji judgment.
Komisija je 3. decembra 2011 objavila obvestilo [9] o delni obnovi protidampinške preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o prvi obnovi) zaradi izvajanja sodbe Xinshiji Splošnega sodišča.
The reopening was limited to determine whether, in the light of the structure of the market, the adjustment of export price to the ex-work level of the importer was appropriate in that it made it possible to compare the export price and the Union industry price at the same level of trade.
Obnova je bila omejena na ugotavljanje, ali je bila glede na strukturo trga prilagoditev izvozne cene ceni uvoznika na ravni franko tovarna primerna za primerjavo izvozne cene in prodajne cene industrije Unije na isti ravni trgovine.
Simultaneously, all interested parties received a disclosure document with its enclosures explaining the reasons behind the adjustment of the post-importation costs which had been taken into account in calculating the price of products originating in the PRC.
Hkrati so vse zainteresirane strani prejele dokument o razkritju s prilogami, v katerih so bili pojasnjeni razlogi za prilagoditev stroškov po uvozu, upoštevanih pri izračunu cene izdelkov s poreklom iz LRK.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to be heard within the time limit set out in the notice.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila.
All parties which so requested within the above time limit and which demonstrated that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted the opportunity to be heard.
Vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so v navedenem roku zahtevale zaslišanje in dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo zaslišanje odobreno.
The two applicant exporters, eight importers, two associations of importers and one association of producers came forward as interested parties.
Kot zainteresirane strani so nastopili oba vložnika izvoznika, osem uvoznikov, dve združenji uvoznikov in eno združenje proizvajalcev.
Analogue country judgment
Sodba v primeru primerljive države
On 22 March 2012, in Case C-338/10 — Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (‘the analogue country judgment’) — the Court declared the original Regulation invalid [10].
Sodišče je 22. marca 2012 v zadevi C-338/10 - Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) proti Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodba v primeru primerljive države) razglasilo prvotno uredbo za nično [10].
The Court held that since the Commission and the Council had determined the normal value of the product concerned on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable in the European Union for a like product, without taking all due care to determine that value on the basis of the prices paid for that same product in a market economy third country, they had infringed the requirements of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Sodišče je presodilo, da sta Komisija in Svet kršila zahteve iz člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, ker sta določila normalno vrednost zadevnega izdelka na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo v Uniji za podobne izdelke, ne da bi izkazala zahtevano skrbnost, da bi to vrednost določila na podlagi cen za ta enak izdelek v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The notice also partially reopened the relevant anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the PRC in order to implement the above judgment of the Court.
Z obvestilom je bila tudi deloma obnovljena ustrezna protidampinška preiskava glede uvoza nekaterih pripravljenih ali konzerviranih agrumov (mandarin itd.) s poreklom iz LRK zaradi izvajanja zgoraj navedene sodbe Sodišča.
The notice set out that the reopening was limited in scope to the selection of an analogue country, if any, and the determination of the normal value pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation to be used for the calculation of any margin of dumping.
V obvestilu je navedeno, da je obnova po obsegu omejena na izbiro primerljive države in določitev normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, ki se uporabi za izračun stopnje dampinga.
Moreover, by the same notice, interested parties were invited to make their views known, submit information and provide supporting evidence regarding the availability of market economy third countries which could be selected to determine normal value pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, including with regard to Israel, Swaziland, Thailand and Turkey.
V istem obvestilu so bile zainteresirane strani tudi pozvane, da izrazijo svoja stališča, predložijo informacije in dokaze glede razpoložljivosti tržnega gospodarstva tretje države, ki so lahko izbrana za določitev normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, vključno z Izraelom, Svazijem, Tajsko in Turčijo.
The Commission directly informed the Union industry and their association, the exporting producers, suppliers and importers and their associations known to be concerned, and the authorities of the third countries concerned.
Komisija je neposredno obvestila proizvajalce Unije in njihova združenja, proizvajalce izvoznike, dobavitelje in uvoznike ter njihova združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter organe zadevnih tretjih držav.
Eight importers and one association of importers came forward as interested parties.
Osem uvoznikov in eno združenje uvoznikov so nastopili kot zainteresirane strani.
PROCEDURE AFTER DISCLOSURE OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES
POSTOPEK PO RAZKRITJU ZAČASNIH UKREPOV
Following the imposition of provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC, several interested parties submitted comments in writing.
Po uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisne pripombe.
The parties who so requested were also granted the opportunity to be heard.
Stranem, ki so to zahtevale, je bilo zaslišanje odobreno.
In particular, the Commission completed the investigation with regard to Union (‘Community’) interest aspects.
Komisija je zaključila preiskavo v zvezi z vidiki interesa Unije („Skupnosti“).
In this respect, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following unrelated importers in the Union:
V zvezi s tem so bili izvedeni preveritveni obiski v prostorih naslednjih nepovezanih uvoznikov v Uniji:
Hüpeden & Co (GmbH & Co) KG, Hamburg, Germany,
Hüpeden & Co (GmbH & Co) KG, Hamburg, Nemčija,
Gaston spol. s r.o., Zlín, Czech Republic.
Gaston spol. s r.o., Zlín, Češka.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK in dokončnega pobiranja zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
Some importers proposed a joint meeting of all interested parties, pursuant to Article 6(6) of the basic Regulation; however the request was refused by one of them.
Nekateri uvozniki so v skladu s členom 6(6) osnovne uredbe predlagali skupno srečanje vseh zainteresiranih strani, vendar je eden od njih zahtevo zavrnil.
Subsequent to the imposition of provisional measures, two unrelated Union importers argued that certain types of mandarins should be excluded from the definition of the product concerned either because of their sweetness level or because of their packing when exported.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov, sta dva nepovezana uvoznika iz Unije trdila, da je treba nekatere vrste mandarin izključiti iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka zaradi sladkosti ali embalaže za izvoz.
In this respect, it is noted that these claims were not accompanied with any type of verifiable information and data proving that these types have characteristics that differentiate them from the product concerned.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da tem trditvam niso bile priložene nikakršne preverljive informacije in podatki, ki bi dokazovali, da se te vrste zaradi svojih značilnosti razlikujejo od zadevnega izdelka.
It is also noted that differences in packing cannot be considered as a critical element when defining product concerned, especially when formats of packing were already taken into account when defining the product concerned as set out in recital 16 of the provisional Regulation.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da se drugačna embalaža ne more šteti za bistven element pri opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka, zlasti ker so oblike embalaže že upoštevane pri opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka iz uvodne izjave 16 začasne uredbe.
The measures were imposed on the product defined in the original Regulation as follows:
Ukrepi so bili uvedeni za naslednji izdelek, opredeljen v prvotni uredbi:
prepared or preserved mandarins (including tangerines and satsumas), clementines, wilkings and other similar citrus hybrids, not containing added spirit, whether or not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter, and as defined under CN heading 2008, currently falling within CN codes 20083055, 20083075 and ex20083090 (TARIC codes 2008309061, 2008309063, 2008309065, 2008309067 and 2008309069) and originating in the PRC.
pripravljene ali konzervirane mandarine (vključno tangerine in satsuma mandarine), klementine, wilking mandarine in drugi podobni hibridi agrumov, ki ne vsebujejo dodanega alkohola, ki vsebujejo dodan sladkor ali druga sladila ali ne, kot so opredeljeni pod oznako KN 2008 in trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN 20083055, 20083075 in ex20083090 (oznake TARIC 2008309061, 2008309063, 2008309065, 2008309067, 2008309069), s poreklom iz LRK.
In this regard, in the analogue country judgement the Court interpreted the statistics communicated by the Commission to the Court on 27 July 2011 as data relative solely to the product concerned.
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče v sodbi v primeru primerljive države razložilo statistične podatke, ki jih je Sodišču sporočila Komisija 27. julija 2011 kot podatke, ki zadevajo samo zadevni izdelek.
However, the Commission has re-examined the full extent of each CN code included in those statistics and it should be noted that they have a broader scope than the product under measures, since they included full CN codes 20083055, 20083075 and 20083090.
Vendar je Komisija ponovno preučila celoten obseg vsake oznake KN, ki so vključene v te statistične podatke in opozoriti bi bilo treba, da se ti statistični podatki uporabljajo širše od izdelka, za katerega se uporabljajo ukrepi, ker v celoti vključujejo oznake KN 20083055, 20083075 in 20083090.