natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Based on this principle of equality within the same region, the Belgian authorities considered that the applicable rules do not constitute over-compensation for farmers and/or compensation for ceasing agricultural practices which are contrary to EU regulations.
Belgijski organi so na podlagi tega načela enakosti znotraj ene regije menili, da pravila, ki se uporabljajo, ne pomenijo previsoke odškodnine za kmete in/ali odškodnine za prenehanje kmetijskih dejavnosti, ki so v nasprotju s predpisi EU.
According to their argument, the competitive disadvantage or advantage within a single agricultural region will be more pronounced within that region than within the EU as a whole.
Trdijo, da bo podrejen konkurenčni položaj ali konkurenčna prednost izrazitejša v eni kmetijski regiji kot v EU kot celoti.
That is why, within Flanders, the entire loss suffered by farmers whose land is situated in the areas with more stringent local standards was compensated (for the actual loss at yield suffered).
Zato se je v Flandriji nadomestila celotna izguba, ki so jo utrpeli kmetje z zemljiščem na območjih, na katerih se uporabljajo strožji lokalni standardi (škoda zaradi dejansko manjšega pridelka).
Thus, according to the Belgian authorities, the permitted quantity of animal manure has, since 1996, already been lower than was stipulated under the first action programme under Directive 91/676/EEC, and for certain crops it has been limited to the level stated under the second action programme.
Po navedbah belgijskih organov je bila tako dovoljena količina živalskega gnoja od leta 1996 že nižja od določene v okviru prvega akcijskega programa po Direktivi 91/676/EGS, za določene kulture pa je bila omejena na raven iz drugega akcijskega programa.
On 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities provided detailed information on the method of calculation in order to show that this was in line with agricultural practice and with the EU legal provisions in force at the time of the measure.
Belgijski organi so 14. januarja 2013 zagotovili podrobne informacije o načinu izračuna, s čimer so pokazali, da je bilo to usklajeno s kmetijsko prakso in s pravnimi določbami EU, veljavnimi v času ukrepa.
However, based on the available information the provisions in the water zones and the nature zones do not appear to go substantially beyond the obligations set out in Directive 91/676/EEC.
Vendar se na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij zdi, da določbe glede vodnih in naravnih območij bistveno ne presegajo obveznosti iz Direktive 91/676/EGS.
In this context, the Commission notes that the Belgian authorities themselves have indicated in their written observations that they had identified the water zones and the nature zones to be particularly sensitive to nitrate pollution, and that they therefore considered lower limits necessary in order to ensure that the target of 50 mg/l nitrates in surface freshwaters, in particular those used for the extraction of drinking water, and in groundwaters was attained.
Komisija v tem okviru navaja, da so belgijski organi sami v pisnih pripombah navedli, da so vodna in naravna območja opredelili kot posebej občutljiva na onesnaževanje z nitrati, zato so bile po njihovem mnenju potrebne nižje meje, da bi se dosegel cilj 50 mg/l nitratov v površinskih sladkih vodah, zlasti v tistih, ki se uporabljajo za črpanje pitne vode, ter v podtalnici.
This was the level which was compulsory at the end of 1995 according to Directive 91/676/EEC.
Ta raven je bila v skladu z Direktivo 91/676/EGS ob koncu leta 1995 obvezna.
Furthermore, as regards the method of calculating the compensation, the Commission requested the Belgian authorities to provide validated studies to demonstrate the accuracy of the assumptions used for the calculation.
Komisija je glede načina izračunavanja odškodnine od belgijskih organov zahtevala, naj zagotovijo potrjene študije, da bi dokazali točnost predpostavk, uporabljenih pri izračunu.
In particular, the Belgian authorities were requested to provide the results of studies demonstrating that a reduction in total fertiliser use from 450 kg N/ha to 350 kg N/ha does in fact result in a reduction in yield of 15 %, and that a reduction from 450 kg N/ha to 400 kg N/ha results in a reduction in yield of 7 %.
Belgijski organi so morali zlasti zagotoviti rezultate študij, s katerimi se je dokazalo, da je zaradi znižanja skupne rabe gnojila s 450 kg N/ha na 350 kg N/ha pridelek dejansko za 15 % manjši ter da je zaradi znižanja skupne rabe gnojila s 450 kg N/ha na 400 kg N/ha pridelek manjši za 7 %.
The Belgian authorities demonstrated the accuracy of the underlying assumptions used for the calculation in their answer from 14 January 2013.
Belgijski organi so v odgovoru z dne 14. januarja 2013 dokazali točnost temeljnih predpostavk, uporabljenih pri izračunu.
Furthermore, the Belgian authorities were also requested to provide additional information on the assumptions used to calculate the effects of this loss of production on the overall profitability of the holding, using a range of hypotheses, including purely arable production and mixed arable/livestock production.
Poleg tega so se od belgijskih organov tudi zahtevale dodatne informacije o predpostavkah, uporabljenih pri izračunu učinkov tega upada pridelka na celotno donosnost gospodarstva, pri čemer so uporabili niz domnev, vključno z izključno poljedelstvom in mešanico poljedelstva/živinoreje.
In particular, the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to provide a detailed explanation as to why a 15 % loss of grass production in a mixed arable/livestock holding is considered to constitute a 40 % loss of profitability of the holding, taking into account the different types of livestock production.
Komisija je belgijske organe zlasti pozvala, naj zagotovijo podrobno pojasnilo o tem, zakaj se 15 % manjši pridelek trave v mešanem poljedelsko/živinorejskem gospodarstvu obravnava kot 40-odstotna izguba donosnosti gospodarstva, pri čemer se upoštevajo različne vrste živinoreje.
The Belgian authorities provided this information in their answer from 14 January 2013.
Belgijski organi so poslali to informacijo v dopisu z dne 14. januarja 2013.
Furthermore, the Belgian authorities were requested to provide calculations based on alternative methods of providing compensation, for example the cost of buying replacement feed as a substitute for the lost production.
Belgijski organi so bili nadalje pozvani, naj zagotovijo izračune na podlagi drugih načinov zagotavljanja odškodnine, na primer stroškov nakupa nadomestne krme kot nadomestka za manjši pridelek.
In their answer from 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities maintain that, as such calculations were not carried out at the time of the measure, it is not possible to make such calculations anymore.
Belgijski organi so v dopisu z dne 14. januarja 2013 trdili, da takih izračunov ni več mogoče opraviti, ker jih niso opravili v času ukrepa.
Therefore, in the Commission's view the Belgian authorities have not demonstrated that the aid was limited to the extra production costs only.
Po mnenju Komisije belgijski organi zato niso dokazali, da je bila pomoč omejena le na dodatne stroške pridelave.
Furthermore, as shown above (para. 79), the aid was not degressive.
Pomoč, kot je navedeno zgoraj (odstavek 79), tudi ni bila degresivna.
Hence, the granting of aid for loss of production does not fulfil the conditions of the Guidelines.
Dodelitev pomoči zaradi manjšega pridelka tako ne izpolnjuje pogojev smernic.
For these reasons, the Commission considers these aid measures not to be compatible with the Treaty.
Komisija zato meni, da ti ukrepi pomoči niso združljivi s Pogodbo.
The Commission finds that Belgium has unlawfully implemented the compensation under the manure decree in breach of Article 93(3) EC Treaty (now Article 108(3) TFEU).
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Belgija z nezakonitim plačevanjem odškodnine po odločbi o gnoju kršila člen 93(3) Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 108(3) PDEU).
The measures fall outside the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92.
Ta ukrep ne spada na področje uporabe Uredbe (EGS) št. 2078/92.
The measures for the compensation for the storage and disposal of excess manure and the loss of production constitute operating aids which only exceptionally can be declared compatible.
Ukrepi plačila odškodnine zaradi skladiščenja in odstranjevanja presežkov gnoja ter manjšega pridelka pomenijo operativne pomoči, ki se lahko kot združljive razglasijo le izjemoma.
For this, the strict approach of the Guidelines foresees that the aid for storage and disposal can be declared compatible if it is temporary and degressive and if it requires a counterpart from the farmer.
S strogim pristopom smernic o pomoči za varstvo okolja je predvideno, da se lahko pomoč za skladiščenje in odstranjevanje kot združljiva razglasi le, če je začasna in degresivna ter če mora kmet izpolniti nasprotne obveznosti.
For the aid for loss of production, the aid should be temporary and degressive and only compensate for extra production costs.
Pomoč za upad pridelka bi morala biti začasna in degresivna, nadomestiti pa bi morala le dodatne stroške pridelave.
As analysed above, these conditions were not fulfilled.
Ti pogoji glede na zgornjo analizo niso bili izpolnjeni.
In the absence of any counterpart from the beneficiaries for the receipt of the aid, and in so far as the aid measures do not appear to contain any incentives for the beneficiaries to take additional steps towards the improvement of environmental protection, according to the Commission, this aid measure does not contribute towards the development of certain economic activities within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Ta ukrep pomoči po mnenju Komisije ne prispeva k razvoju določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti v smislu člena 107(3)(c) PDEU, ker upravičencem za prejemanje pomoči ni treba izpolniti nasprotnih obveznosti in kolikor se zdi, da ukrep ne vsebuje kakršnih koli spodbud, v skladu s katerimi bi upravičenci sprejeli dodatne ukrepe za izboljšanje varstva okolja.
The manure decree was abrogated in 1998 and all the measures were discontinued.
Odločba o gnoju je bila leta 1998 razveljavljena in vsi ukrepi so bili prekinjeni.
For the reasons above, the Commission finds that during its period of application in the years 1996 and 1997 the measure constituted illegal and incompatible aid which in principle has to be recovered.
Komisija glede na navedeno ugotavlja, da je ukrep med obdobjem uporabe, tj. v letih 1996 in 1997, pomenil nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč, ki bi jo bilo treba načeloma povrniti.
Due to the fact that the powers of the Commission to recover incompatible aid are subject to a limitation period of ten years [13], this incompatible aid cannot be recovered.
Te nezdružljive pomoči ni mogoče povrniti, ker imajo pooblastila Komisije zahtevati vračilo pomoči desetletni zastaralni rok [13].
Any individual aid which, at the time of the granting fulfilled the conditions of a block exemption or an approved scheme is compatible with the internal market, up to the maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid.
Vsaka individualna pomoč, ki je ob dodelitvi izpolnjevala pogoje skupinske izjeme ali odobrene sheme, je združljiva z notranjim trgom do največje stopnje intenzivnosti pomoči, ki se uporablja za navedeno vrsto pomoči –
The State aid granted as compensation under the manure decree, unlawfully put into effect by Belgium in breach of Article 93(3) of the EC Treaty, is incompatible with the internal market.
Državna pomoč, dodeljena kot odškodnina po odločbi o gnoju, ki jo je nezakonito izvajala Belgija in s tem kršila člen 93(3) Pogodbe ES, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
Individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 1 which at the time it was granted fulfilled the conditions of a block exemption or an approved scheme is compatible with the internal market, up to maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid.
Individualna pomoč, dodeljena na podlagi sheme iz člena 1, ki je ob dodelitvi izpolnjevala pogoje skupinske izjeme ali odobrene sheme, je združljiva z notranjim trgom do največje stopnje intenzivnosti pomoči, ki se uporablja za navedeno vrsto pomoči.
Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 93(2) of the EC Treaty, concerning the aid/measure C 75/98 (ex NN 45/98) – Belgium (Flanders) – Compensations under the manure decree, OJ C 108, 17.4.1999, p. 12.
Poziv k predložitvi pripomb na podlagi člena 93(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s pomočjo/ukrepom C 75/98 (ex NN 45/98) – Belgija (Flandrija) – Odškodnine po odločbi o gnoju, UL C 108, 17.4.1999, str. 12.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 85.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2078/92 z dne 30. junija 1992 o proizvodnih metodah v kmetijstvu, ki so združljive z zahtevami varstva okolja in ohranjanja podeželja, UL L 215, 30.7.1992, str. 85.
Cited above in footnote 1.
Naveden v opombi 1.
Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1.
Direktiva Sveta 91/676/EGS z dne 12. decembra 1991 o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov, UL L 375, 31.12.1991, str. 1.
Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p. 1.
Direktiva Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic, UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str. 1.
Including chicory, all fruit, shallots, onion, flax, legumes and carrots.
Vključno s cikorijo, vsem sadjem, šalotko, čebulo, lanom, stročnicami in korenjem.
Cited above in footnote 2.
Navedena v opombi 2.
Information from the Commission - Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection, OJ C 72, 10.3.1994, p. 3.
Informacije Komisije – Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja, UL C 72, 10.3.1994, str. 3.
Cited above in footnote 7.
Navedene v opombi 7.
See Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid, OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22.
Glej Obvestilo Komisije o določitvi veljavnih pravil za ocenjevanje nezakonite državne pomoči (UL C 119, 22.5.2002, str. 22).
Cited above in footnote 7, point 3.4.
Navedene v opombi 7, točka 3.4.
Council Regulation No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1, article 15.
Člen 15 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES, UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1.
According to information from the Belgian authorities, payments have been made in 1996.
Glede na informacije belgijskih organov so bila plačila izvršena leta 1996.
Still, the measure had not been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 93(3) EC (now Article 108(3) TFEU).
Vendar ukrep ni bil priglašen Komisiji v skladu s členom 93(3) PES (zdaj člen 108(3) PDEU).
The European Commission asked for additional information on 9 November 2012.
Evropska komisija je 9. novembra 2012 prosila za dodatne informacije.
The Belgian authorities replied by letter of 14 January 2013.
Prejela jih je v dopisu belgijskih organov z dne 14. januarja 2013.
The decree also provides for a freeze on manure production and on the livestock headage in Flanders at the 1992 level.
V odločbi je tudi določeno, da naj bi se proizvodnja gnoja in glave živine v Flandriji ohranile na ravni iz leta 1992.
To that end a local permit policy is introduced.
Zato je uvedena politika lokalnega dovoljenja.
The following table shows the standards governing manure use applicable from 1 January 1996 for water zones.
V spodnji razpredelnici so prikazani standardi, s katerimi se ureja uporaba gnoja od 1. januarja 1996 na vodnih območjih.
Dunes
Sipine
The Commission notes that the present measure was temporary, in that it applied only for the years 1996 and 1997.
Komisija navaja, da je bil sedanji ukrep začasen, saj se je nanašal le na leti 1996 in 1997.
Furthermore, the Commission notes that the Belgian authorities have not notified the continuation of direct aid payments for manure storage or disposal, although the arrangements for manure collection from certain farmers by the manure bank remain unchanged.
Komisija nadalje ugotavlja, da belgijski organi niso priglasili nadaljevanja neposrednih plačil pomoči za skladiščenje ali odstranjevanje gnoja, čeprav se dogovori za zbiranje gnoja med banko za gnoj in določenimi kmeti niso spremenili.
Furthermore, the Belgian authorities pointed out that in 1996 and 1997 the Flemish region already imposed stricter local standards, while the nitrate Directive did not require this until 20 December 1998.
Belgijski organi so poleg tega poudarili, da je flamska regija strožje lokalne standarde uvedla že v letih 1996 in 1997, čeprav je bila v Direktivi o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov zahteva, naj se to uvede do 20. decembra 1998.
In the sensitive water zones, a restriction of 200 kg N/ha has been imposed for grassland, while for maize and other crops it was 170 kg N/ha.
Na občutljivih vodnih območjih se je za travinje uvedla omejitev 200 kg N/ha, za koruzo in druge kulture pa 170 kg N/ha.
providing precautionary Union medium-term financial assistance to Romania
o zagotovitvi preventivne srednjeročne finančne pomoči Unije Romuniji
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments [1] and in particular Article 3(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic [1] in zlasti člena 3(2) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission made after consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske komisje, ki ga je podala po posvetovanju z Ekonomsko-finančnim odborom,
By Decision 2013/532/EU [2], the Council has decided to grant mutual assistance to Romania.
Svet je s Sklepom 2013/532/EU [2] odločil, da se Romuniji dodeli vzajemna pomoč.
Precautionary medium-term financial assistance for Romania under the balance-of-payments facility for Member States is appropriate under the current circumstances of unstable capital flows affecting in particular emerging markets, risks to the macroeconomic scenario, and remaining vulnerabilities in the banking sector.
Preventivna srednjeročna finančna pomoč Romuniji v okviru aranžmaja za plačilne bilance držav članic je ustrezna glede na sedanje razmere, tj. nestabilne kapitalske tokove, ki vplivajo zlasti na nastajajoče trge, tveganja za makroekonomski scenarij in preostale šibke točke v bančnem sektorju.
While under present market conditions Romania does not intend to request the disbursement of any instalment, the precautionary assistance can be expected to help consolidate macroeconomic, budgetary and financial stability and, through the pursuit of structural reforms, increase the resilience and the growth potential of the Romanian economy.
Čeprav Romunija v trenutnih tržnih razmerah ne namerava zaprositi za izplačilo nobenega obroka, se lahko pričakuje, da bi preventivna pomoč prispevala k utrditvi makroekonomske, proračunske in finančne stabilnosti ter z izvajanjem strukturnih reform povečala odpornost romunskega gospodarstva in njegove zmožnosti za rast.
If negative risks materialise, Romania may not be able to cover its external financing needs from available funding resources.
Če se bodo negativna tveganja uresničila, Romunija morda ne bo mogla pokriti svojih potreb po zunanjem financiranju iz razpoložljivih virov financiranja.
These risks are associated with, among others, important external debt and financial sector roll-overs, a high negative net investment position, and spill-overs from adverse developments in the euro area.
Ta tveganja so med drugim povezana s pomembnimi refinanciranji zunanjega dolga in finančnega sektorja, močno negativnim stanjem neto naložb in posledicami neugodnega razvoja dogodkov v euroobmočju.
In such a stress scenario, the residual financing needs may have to be covered from activating the precautionary medium-term financial assistance.
V takšnem izjemnem scenariju bi bilo treba preostale potrebe po financiranju morda kriti z aktivacijo preventivne srednjeročne finančne pomoči.
It is appropriate to provide Union support to Romania of up to EUR 2000 million on a precautionary basis under the facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balance of payments established in Regulation (EC) No 332/2002.
Primerno je, da Unija zagotovi Romuniji preventivno pomoč v višini do 2000 milijonov EUR v okviru aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic, ki je bil uveden z Uredbo (ES) št. 332/2002.
That assistance should be provided in conjunction with support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) through a Stand-by Arrangement in the amount of SDR 1751,34 million (about EUR 2000 million, 170 % of Romania's IMF quota), approved on 27 September 2013, which the authorities are also to treat as precautionary medium-term financial assistance.
To pomoč bi bilo treba zagotoviti v povezavi s podporo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada (MDS) na podlagi „stand-by“ aranžmaja v višini 1751,34 milijona SDR (približno 2000 milijonov EUR, 170 % romunske kvote pri MDS), odobreno 27. septembra 2013, ki jo bodo organi prav tako obravnavali kot preventivno srednjeročno finančno pomoč.
The precautionary medium-term financial assistance should be managed by the Commission which is to agree with the authorities of Romania, after consulting the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC), on the specific economic policy conditions attached to that assistance.
Preventivno srednjeročno finančno pomoč bi morala upravljati Komisija, ki se bo po posvetovanju z Ekonomsko-finančnim odborom z romunskimi organi dogovorila o posebnih pogojih gospodarske politike, povezanih s to pomočjo.
Those conditions should be laid down in a Memorandum of Understanding.
Te pogoje bi bilo treba zapisati v memorandumu o soglasju.
In view of the precautionary nature of the medium-term financial assistance, Romania will not request the disbursement of any instalment under the Union loan, unless difficulties as regards its balance of current payments or capital movements emerge.
Ker je srednjeročna finančna pomoč preventivne narave, Romunija ne bo zaprosila za izplačilo nobenega obroka posojila Unije, razen če bo imela težave v zvezi z bilanco tekočih plačil ali pretoki kapitala.
If Romania makes a request for funding to the Commission, the latter is to decide, after having consulted the EFC, on the activation of the programme and on the amount and timing of such instalments.
Če bo Romunija Komisijo zaprosila za finančna sredstva, se bo Komisija po posvetovanju z Ekonomsko-finančnim odborom odločila o aktivaciji programa ter višini in času izplačila takšnih obrokov.
The detailed financial terms related to possible disbursements is to be laid down in a Precautionary Loan Facility Agreement (PLFA).
Podrobni finančni pogoji, povezani z morebitnimi izplačili, bodo določeni v sporazumu o preventivnem posojilu.
The precautionary medium-term financial assistance should be provided with a view to contributing to the successful implementation of the Government's economic policy programme, and, in this way, should support the sustainability of Romania's balance of payments,
Preventivna srednjeročna finančna pomoč bi se morala zagotoviti z namenom prispevanja k uspešnemu izvajanju vladnega programa gospodarske politike, s čimer bi se podprla vzdržnost plačilne bilance v Romuniji –
Activation of the precautionary medium-term financial assistance and disbursements thereof may be requested until 30 September 2015.
Aktivacijo preventivne srednjeročne finančne pomoči in njenega izplačila je mogoče zahtevati do 30. septembra 2015.