natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in the continuing dialogue process and as mentioned in the recitals above, the Commission disclosed all relevant information within the limits of confidentiality to the interested parties relating to the Indian producer so that they could defend their interest.
Vendar pa je v nadaljevanju dialoga, in kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah zgoraj, Komisija razkrila vse ustrezne informacije v zvezi z indijskim proizvajalcem v okviru meja zaupnosti zainteresiranim stranem, tako da so imele možnost braniti svoje interese.
Determination of normal value for the exporting producers in the PRC, Normal value, Export prices, comparison
Določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, normalna vrednost, izvozne cene, primerjava
Normal value was calculated and compared to the export price as set out above.
Normalna vrednost je bila izračunana in primerjana z izvozno ceno, kot je navedeno zgoraj.
Adjustments to the export price were made to remove the price difference where Chrome VI was added to the coating on the fasteners concerned.
Prilagoditve izvozne cene so bile izvedene, da se odpravi cenovna razlika v primerih, ko je bil premazu na zadevnih pritrdilnih elementih dodan krom VI.
A comparison between the two was made on an ex-works basis, as in the original investigation.
Njuna medsebojna primerjava je bila izvedena na podlagi franko tovarna, tako kot v prvotni preiskavi.
Claims for adjustments based on the product characteristics
Zahtevki za prilagoditve na osnovi lastnosti izdelka
One exporting producer claimed an adjustment under Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation for physical differences in the various types (hexagon screws, wood screws, bolts, etc.) of the product concerned.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je v skladu s členom 2(10)(a) osnovne uredbe zahteval prilagoditev fizikalnih razlik pri različnih vrstah (vijaki s šesterokotno glavo, lesni vijaki, sorniki itd.) zadevnega izdelka.
Since the exporting producer concerned does not, for reasons of confidentiality, have access to the full normal value data, the company relied on its own export prices to demonstrate the extent to which prices vary for each type of fastener.
Ker zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik zaradi zaupnosti nima dostopa do celotnega nabora podatkov o normalni vrednosti, se je družba sklicevala na svoje lastne izvozne cene, da bi pokazala, v kakšni meri se cene razlikujejo pri posameznem tipu pritrdilnega elementa.
In the original investigation the comparison between normal value and export price was made by distinguishing between standard and special types of fasteners, as stated in recital 102 of the definitive Regulation, and also by identifying strength class.
V prvotni preiskavi je bila primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene izvedena z razlikovanjem med standardnimi in posebnimi vrstami pritrdilnih elementov, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 102 dokončne uredbe, in z opredelitvijo trdnostnega razreda.
The full product control numbers (PCNs) were not used in this case given that the producer in the analogue country did not provide information categorised on the basis of the PCNs as requested.
Celotne kontrolne številke izdelka niso bile uporabljene v tem primeru glede na to, da proizvajalec v primerljivi državi ni predložil informacij, kategoriziranih na podlagi kontrolnih številk izdelka, kot je bilo zahtevano.
One of the elements of the original PCN aimed at identifying the different types of fastener according to which CN code they fell under.
Namen enega od elementov prvotne kontrolne številke izdelka je bila opredelitev različnih vrst pritrdilnih elementov glede na to, v katero oznako KN sodijo.
Given that this information was not provided by the Indian producer, this element could not be used in making the comparison in the original investigation.
Glede na to, da indijski proizvajalec ni predložil te informacije, tega elementa ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za primerjavo v prvotni preiskavi.
The information provided by the exporting producer indicated that there may be grounds to adjust for differences in the various types of fasteners.
Informacije, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec izvoznik, so navajale, da utegne obstajati podlaga za prilagoditev razlik med različnimi vrstami pritrdilnih elementov.
However, the methodology suggested was not considered appropriate, given that the company did not provide precise product type information according to CN code, as explained in recital 34, as had originally been requested.
Vendar pa se predlagana metodologija ni štela za ustrezno, saj družba ni predložila natančnih informacij o vrsti izdelka v skladu z oznako KN iz uvodne izjave 34, kot je bilo prvotno zahtevano.
As an alternative, an examination was made of the differences in prices of the Union industry on the Union market to determine whether price differences existed between the different types of fasteners.
Alternativno je bila izvedena preiskava razlik med cenami industrije Unije na trgu Unije, da se določi, ali med različnimi vrstami pritrdilnih elementov obstajajo cenovne razlike.
The information provided by the Union industry had been provided in full by PCN as originally requested.
Informacije, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije, so bile predložene v celotni kontrolni številki izdelka, kot je bilo prvotno zahtevano.
This examination confirmed that prices on the EU market varied depending on the type of fastener.
Ta preiskava je potrdila, da se cene na trgu EU razlikujejo glede na vrsto pritrdilnega elementa.
On this basis, it was considered appropriate to adjust the normal values to reflect these differences.
Na tej podlagi se je štelo za ustrezno, da se prilagodijo normalne vrednosti, tako da odražajo te razlike.
As a basis for adjustment, the average price of sales by the Union industry on the Union market was valued as ‘1’ with all individual types being given their own individual value depending on their price relationship to the average price.
Kot podlaga za prilagoditev je bila povprečna cena v industriji Unije na trgu Unije ovrednotena kot „1“ z vsemi posameznimi vrstami, katerim je bila dodeljena njihova lastna posamezna vrednost glede na razmerje med njihovo ceno in povprečno ceno.
These values were then applied to the normal value used in the comparison with each type exported by the exporting producer.
Te vrednosti so bile nato uporabljene za normalno vrednost, ki je služila za primerjavo posameznih vrst, ki jih je izvažal proizvajalec izvoznik.
As these adjustments were made on the basis of the market value of the differences in physical characteristics on the EU market, it was considered appropriate to make similar adjustments in the calculation of the dumping margins of all exporting producers.
Ker so bile te prilagoditve izvedene na podlagi tržne vrednosti razlik med fizikalnimi značilnostmi na trgu EU, se je štelo za ustrezno, da se izvedejo podobne prilagoditve v izračunu stopenj dampinga za vse proizvajalce izvoznike.
Following the publication of the General Disclosure document the CCME and a Chinese exporter argued that the Commission was still violating of Articles 2.4, 6.2 and 6.4 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement by not providing timely information on the basis of which the export price and normal value was compared and invited the Commission to disclose comprehensive information on the normal value product types used in order to meet its obligation to provide the opportunities to the Chinese exporting producers to ensure the defence of their interest, present their case on a fully informed basis and ensure a fair comparison between export prices and the normal value.
Po objavi dokumenta o splošnem razkritju sta kitajsko združenje industrije pritrdilnih elementov („CCME“) in en kitajski izvoznik trdila, da Komisija še vedno krši člene 2.4, 6.2 in 6.4 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO, ker ne zagotavlja pravočasnih informacij, na podlagi katerih sta bili primerjani izvozna cena in normalna vrednost, ter sta Komisijo pozvala, naj razkrije celovite informacije o normalni vrednosti uporabljenih vrst izdelkov in tako izpolni svojo obveznost, v skladu s katero mora kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom zagotoviti možnosti za zagotavljanje zaščite svojih interesov, predstavitev svojega primera na podlagi popolne obveščenosti in pošteno primerjavo izvoznih cen in normalne vrednosti.
The said parties therefore requested the Commission to re-examine the following:
Navedeni strani sta zato zahtevali, da Komisija ponovno preuči:
full disclosure of the normal value product types;
popolno razkritje vrst izdelkov normalne vrednosti;
ensure that standard fasteners produced by the Chinese exporting producers are not compared to fasteners manufactured by the analogue producer for use in high-end applications;
zagotovitev, da se standardni pritrdilni elementi, ki jih proizvajajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ne primerjajo s pritrdilnimi elementi, ki jih proizvaja primerljivi proizvajalec za uporabo v izdelkih vrhunske tehnologije;
provide evidence on how to substantiate requests for adjustments;
predložitev dokazil o tem, kako utemeljiti zahteve za prilagoditve;
provide information on how certain adjustments were made; and
predložitev informacij o tem, kako so bile nekatere prilagoditve izvedene, ter
the obligation of the EU not to disregard any export transactions.
obveznost EU, da upošteva vse izvozne transakcije.
With regard to point (a), in the light of the information made available through the information notes dated 30 May, 11 July and 13 July 2012, the General Disclosure document sent on 31 July 2012 and in particular recitals 77 to 96, and the hearings held in the course of the consultation process, it is considered that all information which could be disclosed within the limits of the requirements regarding confidentiality has been provided to interested parties.
V zvezi s točko (a) glede na informacije, iz informativnih obvestil z dne 30. maja 2012, 11. julija 2012, 13. julija 2012, dokumenta o splošnem razkritju z dne 31. julija 2012 in zlasti iz uvodnih izjav 77 do 96 in zaslišanj v okviru postopka posvetovanja se šteje, da so bile vse informacije, ki jih je bilo mogoče razkriti v okviru zahtev glede zaupnosti, zagotovljene zainteresiranim stranem.
With regard to point (b) regarding the need to ensure that standard fasteners produced by the Chinese exporting producers are not compared to fasteners manufactured by the analogue producer for use in high-end applications, this aspect has been addressed in recital 78 above.
V zvezi s točko (b) v zvezi s potrebo po zagotovitvi, da se standardni pritrdilni elementi, ki jih proizvajajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ne primerjajo s pritrdilnimi elementi, ki jih proizvaja primerljivi proizvajalec za uporabo v izdelkih vrhunske tehnologije, je bil ta vidik obravnavan v uvodni izjavi 78.
In the absence of any new evidence, and faced with mere allegations by the said parties about the possible presence of fasteners destined to high-end applications other than the automotive industry, the Commission considers that the information available in the file is sufficiently reliable to ensure that only standard fasteners were used for the determination of the normal value used for the comparison with the export prices of the said Chinese exporter.
Ker ni novih dokazov in zaradi trditev navedenih strani o morebitni prisotnosti pritrdilnih elementov za uporabo na visoki ravni, ki niso namenjeni avtomobilski industriji, Komisija meni, da so informacije v spisu dovolj zanesljive, da se zagotovi, da so bili za določitev normalne vrednosti, ki se uporablja za primerjavo z izvoznimi cenami navedenega kitajskega izvoznika, uporabljeni le standardni pritrdilni elementi.
With regard to point (c) and the allegations according to which the Commission failed to provide information on how Chinese exporting producers could substantiate requests for adjustments regarding elements of ‘traceability’, ISO standard 9000, unit of defective rate and other criteria such as ‘hardness, bending, strength, impact toughness, friction coefficient’ (see recital 63 above) and duties on the importation costs (see recitals 79 and 80 above), the Commission notes the following.
V zvezi s točko (c) in trditvami, po katerih naj Komisija ne bi zagotovila informacij o tem, kako bi kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki lahko utemeljili zahteve za prilagoditve v zvezi z elementi „sledljivosti“, standardom ISO 9000, enoto stopnje napake in drugimi merili, kot so „trdota, upogibnost, udarna žilavost, koeficient trenja“ (glej uvodno izjavo 63 zgoraj) in dajatve za stroške uvoza (glej uvodni izjavi 79 in 80 zgoraj), Komisija ugotavlja naslednje.
Firstly, it is recalled that these elements have been raised by the parties without providing any further details.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da so te elemente navedle strani brez kakršnih koli nadaljnjih podrobnosti.
During a hearing held by the Hearing Officer on 11 July 2012, the Commission invited the parties to provide additional information regarding the abovementioned issues, but no additional information was provided.
Med zaslišanjem, ki ga je 11. julija 2012 vodil pooblaščenec za zaslišanje, je Komisija strani pozvala, naj predložijo dodatne informacije v zvezi z zgoraj navedenimi vprašanji, vendar dodatne informacije niso bile predložene.
With regard to the request for adjustments on export prices to take into account the duties on the importation of wire rod into India and, in general, cheaper access to raw materials for Chinese exporting producers, the Commission explained in detail in recital 80 the reason why this adjustment could not be accepted.
V zvezi z zahtevo, da bi pri prilagoditvah izvoznih cen upoštevali dajatve za uvoz valjane žice v Indijo in na splošno cenejši dostop do surovin za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, je Komisija v uvodni izjavi 80 podrobno pojasnila, zakaj te prilagoditve ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
Moreover, as set out in recital 63 of the original Regulation, the cost of the major raw material — steel wire rod — did not substantially reflect market values.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 63 prvotne uredbe, strošek glavne surovine – jeklene žičnate palice – ni bistveno odražal tržnih vrednosti.
It was found that the prices of the steel wire rods charged on the domestic market were significantly lower than those charged on other markets.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile cene jeklenih žičnatih palic, zaračunane na domačem trgu, bistveno nižje od cen, zaračunanih na drugih trgih.
Therefore, these distorted prices cannot be used as a basis for adjustment as requested by the said parties.
Zato teh izkrivljenih cen ni mogoče uporabiti kot osnovo za prilagoditev, kot to zahtevajo navedene strani.
In these circumstances, the Commission fails to see which additional information, in the view of the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and the exporting producer, could be provided to further substantiate these two requests for adjustments.
V teh okoliščinah Komisija ne razume, katere dodatne informacije bi se po mnenju kitajske trgovinske zbornice in proizvajalca izvoznika lahko zagotovile, da bi se dodatno utemeljili ti dve zahtevi za prilagoditve.
With regard to point (d) it is recalled that information regarding the ‘normal value types of the EU producers and their price levels, as well as the impact of the resulting adjustments on the normal value types of the analogue producer’ are confidential and cannot be disclosed.
V zvezi s točko (d) je treba opozoriti, da so informacije v zvezi z „vrstami normalne vrednosti proizvajalcev EU in njihove ravni cen, pa tudi vpliv nastalih prilagoditev za vrste normalne vrednosti primerljivega proizvajalca“ zaupne in se jih ne sme razkriti.
The Chinese Chamber of Commerce and one Chinese exporting producer requested further clarifications on how the adjustments for the price difference of coating has been done.
Kitajska trgovinska zbornica in en kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik sta zahtevala dodatna pojasnila o tem, kako so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razliko v ceni premaza.
However, as indicated in recital 92 above, it should be noted that in the specific disclosure document, the Commission indicated which exported product types have been adjusted, thus allowing the parties concerned to understand how the adjustment was made.
Vendar pa, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 92 zgoraj, je treba opozoriti, da je v posebnem dokumentu o razkritju Komisija navedla, katere vrste izvoženega izdelka so bile prilagojene, da bi zadevne strani lahko razumele, kako je bila prilagoditev izvedena.
With regard to point (e) and the alleged need to take into account all comparable export transactions in the dumping calculation in order to ensure a fair price comparison pursuant to Article 2.4.2 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, the Commission notes that it is precisely following the request and suggestions made by the said parties, that the normal value used for the determination of dumping margins was adjusted.
V zvezi s točko (e) in trditvijo, da je pri izračunu dampinga treba upoštevati vse primerljive izvozne transakcije, da bi se zagotovila poštena primerjava cen v skladu s členom 2.4.2 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO, Komisija ugotavlja, da natančno upošteva zahtevo in predloge, ki so jih izrazile navedene strani, da se prilagodi normalna vrednost, ki se uporablja za določitev stopenj dampinga.
The methodology used was explained in recitals 93 to 96 above and the reasons for expressing the amount of dumping found as a percentage of those export transactions used in calculating the amount of dumping outlined in recitals 107 and 108 below are in full compliance with Article 2.4.2 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, which refers to comparable export transactions.
Uporabljena metodologija je bila pojasnjena v uvodnih izjavah 93 do 96, razlogi za izražanje zneska dampinga kot odstotka navedenih izvoznih transakcij, uporabljenih pri izračunu dampinga, pa so navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 107 in 108 v popolni skladnosti s členom 2.4.2 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO, ki se nanaša na primerljive izvozne transakcije.
In this case, all comparable transactions (by product types) have been used for the comparison.
V tem primeru so bile za primerjavo uporabljene vse primerljive transakcije (glede na vrsto izdelka).
Therefore, it was reasonable to express the amount of dumping found as a percentage of those export transactions used in calculating the amount of dumping.
Zato je bilo smiselno, da se znesek dampinga izrazi kot odstotek navedenih izvoznih transakcij, uporabljenih pri izračunu dampinga.
Following the general disclosure, two Chinese exporting producers reiterated that adjustments should be made for alleged differences in efficiency of consumption of the raw material and easier access to raw material, more efficient electricity consumption and lower productivity per employee.
Po splošnem razkritju sta dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika ponovno poudarila, da bi bilo treba opraviti prilagoditve za domnevne razlike v učinkovitosti porabe surovin in lažjem dostopu do surovin, učinkovitejšo porabo električne energije in nižjo produktivnost na zaposlenega.
It is recalled that none of the Chinese exporting producers received MET in the original investigation and their cost structure cannot be considered as reflecting market values that can be used as a basis for adjustments in particular with regard to access to raw materials.
Opozoriti je treba, da noben od kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v prvotni preiskavi ni prejel TGO in da njihove strukture stroškov ni mogoče obravnavati, kot da odraža tržne vrednosti, ki se lahko uporabijo kot podlaga za prilagoditve, zlasti glede dostopa do surovin.
In addition, it should be noted that the production processes existing in the PRC were found to be comparable to the Indian producer’s and the alleged differences were found to be very minor.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da je bilo ugotovljeno, da so proizvodni postopki v LRK, primerljivi s postopki indijskega proizvajalca in da so domnevne razlike zelo majhne.
In this case, the Indian producer was found to be competing with many other producers on the Indian domestic market, it is considered that its prices were fully reflecting the situation in the domestic market.
V tem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da je indijski proizvajalec konkuriral številnim drugim proizvajalcem na indijskem domačem trgu, in šteje se, da so njegove cene v celoti odražale stanje na domačem trgu.
As mentioned in recital 41 above, a surrogate of the costs and prices of producers in functioning market economies had to be used for the purpose of establishing the normal value.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 41, je bilo treba za določitev normalne vrednosti kot nadomestilo uporabiti stroške in cene proizvajalcev v delujočih tržnih gospodarstvih.
The same two Chinese exporting producers argued that in summarising the data on diameter and length into ranges, the Commission should not refer to ranges but use the actual figures for length and diameter to carry out the comparison.
Navedena kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila, da se Komisija z združevanjem podatkov o premeru in dolžini v razpone ne bi smela nanašati na razpone, temveč bi morala za primerjavo uporabiti dejanske vrednosti za dolžino in premer.
Firstly, as mentioned in recital 70 above, the Commission agreed following a hearing held on 26 June 2012 with the same parties to range the diameter and length in order to take into account the impact of the physical characteristics on prices.
Prvič, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 70, Komisija se je po zaslišanju 26. junija 2012 z istimi stranmi strinjala, da se izdelki razdelijo na podlagi premera in dolžine ter se upošteva učinek fizičnih lastnosti na cene.
The said parties themselves indicated some possible ranges, the Commission however, indicated during the hearing that these proposed ranges should be revised in order to ensure the matching of all exported types to closely resembling types of the Indian producer.
Navedene strani so same navedle nekatere možne razpone, vendar je Komisija na zaslišanju navedla, da bi bilo treba te predlagane razpone popraviti, da bi se zagotovilo ujemanje vseh izvoženih vrst z zelo podobnimi vrstami indijskega proizvajalca.
Secondly, the said parties stated in a presentation made during a hearing held on 3 July 2012 as an example, that the diameter would have a small impact in terms of unit consumption of raw material.
Drugič, navedene strani so na predstavitvi med zaslišanjem 3. julija 2012 kot primer navedle, da bi imel premer majhen učinek na porabo surovin na enoto.
The dumping margins were established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price.
Stopnje dampinga so bile določene na podlagi tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti s tehtanim povprečjem izvozne cene.
The definitive dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Union border, duty unpaid, for the exporting producer subject to this review is the following:
Dokončna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot delež uvozne cene CIF meja Unije, brez plačane dajatve, za proizvajalca izvoznika iz tega poročila, je naslednja:
The revised definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Union border, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Revidirane dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot delež uvozne cene CIF meja Unije, brez plačane dajatve, so naslednje:
Existing dumping margin (%)
Obstoječa stopnja dampinga
Revised dumping margin (%)
Revidirana stopnja dampinga
Changshu City Standard Parts Factory and Changshu British Shanghai International Fastener Co., Ltd
Changshu City Standard Parts Factory in Changshu British Shanghai International Fastener Co., Ltd
Cooperating exporting producers not selected to form part of the sample
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec