natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore necessary to set the date of establishment of the amounts in question within the meaning of Articles 2(2) and 6(3)(a) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources [8].
Zato je treba določiti datum določitve zadevnih zneskov ob upoštevanju člena 2(2) in člena 6(3)(a) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1150/2000 z dne 22. maja 2000 o izvajanju Sklepa 2007/436/ES, Euratom o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Skupnosti [8].
By way of derogation from Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 967/2006, the amount of the surplus levy for a maximum quantity of 150000 tonnes of sugar in white sugar equivalent and 8000 tonnes of isoglucose in dry matter, produced in excess of the quota fixed in Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and released on the Union market in the 2012/2013 marketing year, shall be fixed at EUR 177 per tonne.
Z odstopanjem od člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 967/2006 se znesek presežne dajatve za največjo dovoljeno količino 150000 ton sladkorja, izraženo v ekvivalentu belega sladkorja, in 8000 ton izoglukoze, izraženo v suhi snovi, ki sta bila proizvedena nad kvoto iz Priloge VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007 in dana na trg Unije v tržnem letu 2012/2013, določi na 177 EUR na tono.
The period during which applications may be submitted shall end on 11 June 2013 at 12 noon, Brussels time.
Obdobje za predložitev vlog se konča 11. junija 2013 ob 12:00 po bruseljskem času.
Each tonne covered by a certificate but not released on the Union market for reasons other than force majeure, shall be subject to payment of an amount of EUR 323/tonne.
Za vsako tono iz dovoljenja, ki ni bila dana na trg Unije iz drugih razlogov, kot je višja sila, se plača znesek v višini 323 EUR na tono.
For the 2012/2013 marketing year, the levy referred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 967/2006 shall not apply to the quantities issued of this certificate, subject to the respect of the rules laid down in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 505/2013, in particular in Article 2(5)(c).
Za tržno leto 2012/2013 se dajatev iz člena 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 967/2006 ne uporablja za količine, odobrene s tem dovoljenjem, pod pogojem, da se upoštevajo pravila iz Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 505/2013, zlasti člena 2(5)(c).
Based on the estimated supply and demand for 2012/2013, the ending stocks for the sugar market are expected to be lower by at least 0,5 million tonnes than in 2011/2012.
Na podlagi ocenjene ponudbe in povpraševanja za leto 2012/2013 se pričakuje, da bodo končne zaloge na trgu sladkorja za najmanj 0,5 milijona tone nižje kot v letu 2011/2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 506/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 506/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 507/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 507/2013
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 June 2013
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 1. junija 2013
Import duties should be fixed for the period from 1 June 2013 and should apply until new import duties are fixed and enter into force.
Uvozne dajatve, ki se uporabljajo do začetka veljavnosti nove določitve se določijo za obdobje od 1. junija 2013.
From 1 June 2013, the import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information contained in Annex II.
S 1. junijem 2013 se uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 določijo v Prilogi I k tej uredbi na podlagi podatkov iz Priloge II.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 1 June 2013
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 1. junija 2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 508/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 508/2013
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tungsten electrodes originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) and 11(2), (5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9(4) ter člena 11(2), (5) in (6) Uredbe,
Following an investigation (the ‘original investigation’) the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 260/2007 [2], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tungsten electrodes originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’) (the ‘original measures’).
Svet je po preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 260/2007 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) („prvotni ukrepi“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty of 63,5 % for all companies except three Chinese exporting producers to whom individual duties were granted.
Ukrepi so bili uvedeni v obliki dajatve ad valorem v višini 63,5 % za vse družbe, razen za tri kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, katerim so bile dodeljene individualne dajatve.
On 9 March 2012, the Commission announced by a notice (‘Notice of initiation’) [3], published in the Official Journal of the European Union, the initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain tungsten electrodes originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 9. marca 2012 z obvestilom („obvestilo o začetku“) [3], objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa glede protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz LRK.
The review was initiated following a substantiated request lodged by Eurométaux (‘the applicant’) on behalf of a Union producer representing more than 50 % of the Union production of certain tungsten electrodes.
Pregled se je začel po utemeljenem zahtevku, ki ga je vložilo združenje Eurométaux („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalca Unije, ki predstavlja več kot 50 % proizvodnje nekaterih volframovih elektrod v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation of dumping and injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi iztek veljavnosti ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje dampinga in škodil industriji Unije.
Review investigation period and the period considered
3.1 Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in obravnavano obdobje
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava v zvezi z nadaljevanjem ali ponovitvijo dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2008 to the end of the RIP (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2008 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Parties concerned by the investigation
3.2 Strani, ki jih zadeva preiskava
The Commission officially advised the applicant, the other known Union producer, exporting producers in the PRC, unrelated importers and users known to be concerned, producers in the potential analogue countries and the representatives of the PRC of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila vložnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, nepovezane uvoznike in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, proizvajalce v morebitno primerljivih državah ter predstavnike LRK.
In view of the apparently large number of exporting producers in the PRC and unrelated importers in the Union involved in the investigation, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in nepovezanih uvoznikov v Uniji, ki so bili vključeni v preiskavo, je bilo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above parties were requested, pursuant to Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the publication of the Notice of initiation and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the Notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bile navedene strani pozvane, naj se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v 15 dneh po objavi obvestila o začetku javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo zahtevane informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
Three importers made themselves known.
Javili so se trije uvozniki.
None of them, however, imported certain tungsten electrodes originating in the PRC during the RIP.
Vendar nobeden od njih v OPP ni uvažal nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz LRK.
As only two exporting producers from the PRC came forward with the requested information it was not necessary to select a sample of exporting producers.
Ker sta se z zahtevanimi informacijami javila samo dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK, ni bilo treba izbrati vzorca proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Replies were received from two Union producers, two exporting producers in the PRC and one producer in the USA.
Odgovore sta poslala dva proizvajalca Unije, dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK in en proizvajalec iz ZDA.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and resulting injury and of the Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in posledične škode ter za ugotovitev interesa Unije.
Plansee SE, Austria
Plansee SE, Avstrija
Gesellschaft für Wolfram Industrie mbH, Germany
Gesellschaft für Wolfram Industrie mbH, Nemčija
Shandong Weldstone Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd, Zibo
Shandong Weldstone Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd., Zibo
Shaanxi Yuheng Tungsten & Molybdenum Industrial Co., Ltd, Baoji
Shaanxi Yuheng Tungsten & Molybdenum Industrial Co., Ltd., Baoji
Related company to one cooperating exporting producer in the PRC
povezana družba enega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK
Related companies to one cooperating exporting producer in the European Union
povezane družbe enega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika iz Evropske unije
Weldstone GmbH, Wilnsdorf, Germany
Weldstone GmbH, Wilnsdorf, Nemčija
Binzel Benelux bvba, Eke – Nazareth, Belgium
Binzel Benelux bvba, Eke – Nazareth, Belgija
Analogue Country
primerljiva država
Global Tungsten & Powders Corp, Towanda, USA.
Global Tungsten & Powders Corp, Towanda, ZDA.
B. PRODUCT UNDER REVIEW AND LIKE PRODUCT
B. IZDELEK, KI SE PREGLEDUJE, IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
The product concerned is the same as that covered by Regulation (EC) No 260/2007, namely tungsten welding electrodes, including tungsten bars and rods for welding electrodes, containing 94 % or more by weight of tungsten, other than those obtained simply by sintering, whether or not cut to length, originating in the PRC (‘TE’ or ‘the product under review’), currently falling within CN codes ex81019910 and ex85159000.
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot tisti, ki ga zajema Uredba (ES) št. 260/2007, in sicer volframove varilne elektrode, vključno z volframovimi drogovi in palicami za varilne elektrode, z vsebnostjo volframa najmanj 94 mas. %, razen tistih, ki so dobljeni samo s sintranjem, narezani po dolžini ali ne, s poreklom iz LRK („VE ali izdelek, ki se pregleduje“), ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznaki KN ex81019910 in ex85159000.
The product under review is used in welding and similar processes.
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, se uporablja pri varjenju in podobnih postopkih.
Based on the physical and chemical characteristics and the substitutability of the different types of the product from the perspective of the user, all TE are considered to constitute a single product for the purpose of this proceeding.
Na podlagi fizikalnih in kemičnih lastnosti ter zamenljivosti različnih vrst izdelka z vidika uporabnika, se vse VE za namene postopka štejejo kot en izdelek.
The investigation confirmed that, as in the original investigation, the product under review and that manufactured and sold on the domestic market of the PRC, as well as that produced and sold by the Union industry on the Union market and that produced and sold on the analogue country market have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and the same basic uses and are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
S preiskavo je bilo tako kot s prvotno preiskavo potrjeno, da imajo izdelek, ki se pregleduje, izdelki, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo na domačem trgu LRK, ter tisti, ki jih proizvajalci Unije proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu Unije, ter izdelki, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu primerljive države, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične značilnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo, zato se v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za podobne izdelke.
C. LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION OR A RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
C. VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was currently taking place and whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo preučeno, ali je damping trenutno prisoten in ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo zaradi izteka veljavnosti obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
As explained above, it was not necessary to select a sample of exporting producers in the PRC.
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, vzorca proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK ni bilo treba izbrati.
The two cooperating companies covered the imports of product concerned from the PRC to the Union in a range of 80 % to 85 % during the RIP.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Unijo dveh sodelujočih družb je v OPP znašal med 80 % in 85 %.
On this basis, it was concluded that cooperation was high.
Na tej podlagi se je sklenilo, da je bila raven sodelovanja visoka.
One of the cooperating exporting producers benefited from market economy treatment (‘MET’) in accordance with Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, while the second benefited from individual treatment (‘IT’) in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, granted to them during the original investigation.
V prvotni preiskavi je bila enemu sodelujočemu proizvajalcu izvozniku odobrena tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“) v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, medtem ko je bila drugemu odobrena individualna obravnava („IO“) v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
It is recalled that in the context of investigations in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, MET and IT are not reconsidered.
Opozoriti je treba, da se v okviru preiskav v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe TGO in IO ne presojata ponovno.
A third company, who did not cooperate in the current expiry review, was granted IT in the original investigation.
Tretji družbi, ki ni sodelovala v sedanjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, je bila v prvotni preiskavi odobrena IO.
Analogue country
2.1 Primerljiva država
Since the PRC is an economy in transition and in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for exporting producers not granted market economy treatment has to be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in an appropriate market economy third country (‘analogue country’).
V skladu z določbami člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe in ker je gospodarstvo LRK v tranziciji, je treba normalno vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim tržnogospodarska obravnava ni bila odobrena, določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
As in the original investigation, the USA was proposed as analogue country in the Notice of initiation for the purpose of establishing normal value.
Kot v prvotni preiskavi, so bile v obvestilu o začetku kot primerljiva država za določitev normalne vrednosti predlagane ZDA.
The Commission also examined whether other countries could be a reasonable choice of an analogue country and identified other third countries from which imports of tungsten electrodes were recorded in Eurostat.
Komisija je prav tako preučila, ali bi lahko bile druge države smiselna izbira za primerljivo državo in opredelila druge tretje države, iz katerih je Eurostat zabeležil uvoz volframovih elektrod.
Potential known producers in these countries were contacted and invited to cooperate in the investigation.
Morebitni znani proizvajalci iz teh držav so bili kontaktirani in pozvani, naj sodelujejo v preiskavi.
It was considered that the USA was representative as a reference market, especially in view of the openness and competitiveness of their domestic market.
Štelo se je, da so ZDA reprezentativne kot referenčni trg, zlasti zaradi odprtosti in konkurenčnosti njihovega notranjega trga.
The USA was used also as an analogue country in the original investigation.
ZDA so bile kot primerljiva država uporabljene tudi pri prvotni preiskavi.
No new or changed circumstances which would justify a change appeared to exist nor were any such circumstances communicated to the Commission.
Zdelo se je, da niso prisotne nobene nove ali spremenjene okoliščine, ki bi upravičile spremembo, prav tako o takih okoliščinah ni bila obveščena Komisija.
The only known USA producer was contacted and agreed to cooperate, to reply to the questionnaire and to accept a verification visit.
Vzpostavljen je bil stik z edinim znanim proizvajalcem v ZDA, ki se strinjal, da bo sodeloval, izpolnil vprašalnik in sprejel preveritveni obisk.
The verified sales and production figures of this company have been used for the determination of the normal value for companies not granted MET during the original investigation.
Preverjeni podatki o prodaji in proizvodnji te družbe so bili uporabljeni za določanje normalne vrednosti za družbe, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena v prvotni preiskavi.
Normal value
2.2 Normalna vrednost
For the company granted MET in the original investigation, normal value has been established based on its data.
Za družbo, kateri je bila v prvotni preiskavi odobrena TGO, je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi njenih podatkov.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the domestic sales of TE to independent customers were representative during the RIP, i.e. if the sales volume of the product intended for domestic consumption represented 5 % or more of their exports of the product under review to the Union.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe preučila, ali je bila domača prodaja VE neodvisnim strankam v OPP reprezentativna, tj. ali je obseg prodaje izdelka, namenjenega domači potrošnji, znašal 5 % ali več izvoza izdelka, ki se pregleduje, družb v Unijo.
It was subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of the like product could be regarded as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market.
Komisija je nato preučila, ali se domača prodaja podobnega izdelka lahko šteje, da je bila opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe, in sicer tako, da se je določil delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu.
For the types of the product concerned where the domestic sales were representative and made in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was established on the prices paid by independent customers in the exporting country.
Za vrste zadevnega izdelka, za katere je bila domača prodaja reprezentativna in del običajnega poteka trgovanja, je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi cen, ki so jih plačale neodvisne stranke v državi izvoznici.
For the remaining types of the product under review the normal value had to be constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za preostale vrste izdelka, ki se pregleduje, je bilo treba normalno vrednost konstruirati v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the established normal value was calculated using the company’s cost of manufacturing and adding selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A) and profit achieved on the domestic sale made in the ordinary course of trade in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila določena normalna vrednost izračunana na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov družbe, katerim so se prišteli prodajni, splošni in upravni stroški (PSA-stroški) ter dobiček od prodaje na domačem trgu v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
Following disclosure, one party argued that the methodology used to determine SG&A expenses was different from the one used in the original investigation which may have had an impact on the determination of the profit margin used to calculate the constructed normal value in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Po razkritju je ena stran trdila, da je bila metodologija, ki se je uporabila za določitev PSA-stroškov, drugačna od metodologije, uporabljene v prvotni preiskavi, kar je lahko vplivalo na določitev stopnje dobička, ki se uporablja pri izračunu konstruirane normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
Further to the information already previously submitted in the investigation the party did not substantiate its claim by any evidence.
Razen informacij, ki jih je stran v preiskavi predložila že prej, svojih trditev ni utemeljila z nobenimi dokazi.
It is noted that in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation SG&A expenses were allocated on turnover basis and that this methodology was also used in the original investigation.
Opozoriti je treba, da so bili v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe PSA-stroški dodeljeni na podlagi prometa in da je bila ta metodologija uporabljena tudi v prvotni preiskavi.
Profit used in the initial investigation was not from the OCOT test (ordinary course of trade) as none of the exported types of the product concerned were sold on the domestic market in the ordinary course of trade.
Dobiček, ki je bil uporabljen v prvotni preiskavi, ni izviral iz običajnega poteka trgovine, saj se nobena od izvoženih vrst zadevnega izdelka ni prodajala na domačem trgu v običajnem poteku trgovine.
The current expiry review showed that some types of the product concerned were profitable and therefore, in compliance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation, profit of these profitable transactions was used for constructing the normal value.
Sedanji pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa je pokazal, da so nekatere vrste zadevnega izdelka bile dobičkonosne, zato je bil v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe dobiček teh dobičkonosnih transakcij uporabljen za določitev normalne vrednosti.