natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the animal testing and marketing ban and on the state of play in relation to alternative methods in the field of cosmetics, COM(2013) 135 final.
Evropska komisija, Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o prepovedi testiranja na živalih in trženja ter stanju glede alternativnih metod na področju kozmetičnih izdelkov (COM(2013) 135 final).
Hall B., Tozer S., Safford B., Coroama M., Steiling W., Leneveu-Duchemin M.C., McNamara C. and Gibney M., European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Volume 45, Issue 11, November 2007, Pages 2097-2108.
Hall, B., Tozer, S., Safford, B., Coroama, M., Steiling, W., Leneveu-Duchemin, M. C., McNamara, C., in Gibney, M., European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments, Food and Chemical Toxicology, zvezek 45, številka 11, november 2007, str. 2097–2108.
Kroes R., Renwick A. G., Feron V., Galli C. L., Gibney M., Greim H., Guy R. H., Lhuguenot J. C., van de Sandt J. J. M., Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients, Food and Chemical Toxicology 45 (2007), 2533–2562.
Kroes, R., Renwick, A. G., Feron, V., Galli, C. L., Gibney, M., Greim, H., Guy, R. H., Lhuguenot, J. C., van de Sandt, J. J. M., Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients, Food and Chemical Toxicology 45 (2007), 2533–2562.
2008 May; 46(5):1516-24, Epub 2007 Dec 23.
H., Re, T. A., Renskers, K. J., Scrafford‚ C. G., Exposure data for cosmetic products: facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow, Food Chem Toxicol., maj 2008, 46(5):1516–24, Epub, 23. december 2007.
Mildau G., Burkhard A., Daphi-Weber J., Große-Damhues J., Jung J., Schuster B., Walther C., Basic Requirements for Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products, SOFW Journal, 133 6-2007, pp. 16-22.
Mildau, G., Burkhard, A., Daphi-Weber, J., Große-Damhues, J., Jung, J., Schuster, B., Walther, C., Basic Requirements for Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products, SOFW Journal, 133 6-2007, str. 16–22.
Pauwels M., Rogiers V., Human Health Safety Evaluation of Cosmetics in the EU: A Legally Imposed Challenge to Science, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 243 (2010), pp. 260-274.
Pauwels, M., Rogiers, V., Human Health Safety Evaluation of Cosmetics in the EU: A Legally Imposed Challenge to Science, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 243 (2010), str. 260–274.
SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Guidance on safety assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics, SCCS/1484/12.
ZOVP (Znanstveni odbor za varstvo potrošnikov), Guidance on safety assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics, SCCS/1484/12.
SCCS, The SCCS’s Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their Safety Evaluation, 8th Revision, SCCS/1501/12.
ZOVP, Navodila ZOVP za testiranje kozmetičnih snovi in njihovo oceno varnosti, 8. revizija, SCCS/1501/12.
SCCS, SCHER and SCENIHR, Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures, 2012.
ZOVP, ZOZOT in ZONNUZT, Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures, 2012.
Greim H. and Snyder R. (eds), Toxicology and Risk Assessment — A comprehensive Introduction.
Greim, H., in Snyder, R. (ur.), Toxicology and Risk Assessment – A comprehensive Introduction.
Klimisch HJ, Andreae E and Tillmann U, A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental and ecotoxicological data.
Klimisch, H. J., Andreae, E., in Tillmann, U., A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental and ecotoxicological data.
Paris
Pariz.
Another example could be the inclusion of food materials for which a much higher innocuous ingestion level is known. When the requirement to calculate the margin of safety cannot be met, a different way of expressing the safe dose for each substance may be appropriate, where justified.
Še en primer bi bila vključitev živilskih snovi, za katere je znana precej večja neškodljiva količina ob zaužitju.Kadar zahteve za izračun meje varne uporabe ni mogoče izpolniti, je lahko primeren tudi drugačen način izražanja varnega odmerka za vsako snov, če je utemeljen.
Whenever oral absorption data are available, these should be included in the calculations. The NOAEL chosen for calculating the margin of safety is taken from long-term repeated dose toxicity studies (sub-acute, sub-chronic, and/or chronic toxicity tests, carcinogenesis tests, teratogenesis tests, reproduction toxicity, etc.).
Vedno, kadar so na voljo podatki o oralni absorpciji, jih je treba vključiti v izračune.Vrednost NOAEL, ki se izbere za izračun meje varne uporabe, mora izhajati iz dolgoročnih študij strupenosti pri ponavljajočih se odmerkih (subakutnih, subkroničnih in/ali kroničnih preskusov strupenosti, preskusov rakotvornosti, teratogenosti, strupenosti za razmnoževanje itd.).
H.J. Klimisch, E. Andreae and U. Tillmann (1997), A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental and ecotoxicological data.
H. J. Klimisch, E. Andreae in U. Tillmann (1997), A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental and ecotoxicological data.
Loretz L.J., Api A.M., Babcock L., Barraj L.M., Burdick J., Cater K.C., Jarrett G., Mann S., Pan Y.H., Re T.A., Renskers K.J., Scrafford C.G., Exposure data for cosmetic products: facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow, Food Chem Toxicol.
Loretz, L. J., Api, A. M., Babcock, L., Barraj, L. M., Burdick, J., Cater, K. C., Jarrett, G., Mann, S., Pan, Y.
authorising Romania to continue to apply a special measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
o dovoljenju Romuniji, da še naprej uporablja posebni ukrep z odstopanjem od člena 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost
By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 13 March 2013, Romania requested authorisation for the extension of a special measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC in relation to supplies of wood products.
Romunija je v dopisu, ki ga je generalni sekretariat Komisije evidentiral 13. marca 2013, zahtevala dovoljenje za podaljšanje uporabe posebnega ukrepa z odstopanjem od člena 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES v zvezi z dobavo lesnih proizvodov.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 17 June 2013 of the request made by Romania.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 395(2) Direktive 2006/112/ES je Komisija z dopisom z dne 17. junija 2013 o zahtevi Romunije obvestila druge države članice.
By letter dated 18 June 2013, the Commission notified Romania that it had all the information it considered necessary for appraisal of the request.
Z dopisom z dne 18. junija 2013 je Komisija uradno obvestila Romunijo, da ima vse informacije, potrebne za presojo zahteve.
Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC provides that the taxable person supplying the goods or services is, as a general rule, liable for the payment of value added tax (VAT) to the tax authorities.
Člen 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES določa, da je davčni zavezanec, ki dobavlja blago ali storitve, po splošnem pravilu zavezan k plačilu davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) davčnim organom.
Council Implementing Decision 2010/583/EU [2] authorised Romania to apply a derogating measure pursuant to Article 395 of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to designate the recipient as the person liable for the payment of VAT in the case of supplies of wood products by taxable persons.
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2010/583/EU [2] Romuniji dovoljuje uporabo ukrepa odstopanja v skladu s členom 395 Direktive 2006/112/ES, da določi prejemnika kot osebo, ki je zavezana k plačilu DDV v primeru, da davčni zavezanci dobavijo lesne proizvode.
Prior to the former authorisation to apply reverse charge to the supplies of wood, Romania had encountered problems in the timber market because of the nature of the market and the businesses involved.
Pred predhodnim dovoljenjem za uporabo obrnjene davčne obveznosti za dobavo lesa je imela Romunija težave na trgu lesa zaradi narave trga in poslovanja.
There is a large number of small enterprises in this sector which the Romanian authorities have found difficult to control.
V tem sektorju je veliko število majhnih podjetij, ki jih romunski organi težko nadzirajo.
Designating the recipient as the person liable for the payment of VAT has, according to the Romanian authorities, had the effect of preventing tax evasion and avoidance in this sector and therefore remains justified.
Določitev prejemnika kot osebe, ki je zavezana k plačilu DDV, je po navedbah romunskih oblasti preprečila davčne utaje in izogibanje plačilu davkov v tem sektorju in zato ostaja utemeljena.
The measure is proportionate to the objectives pursued since it is not intended to apply generally, but only to very specific operations in a sector which poses considerable problems of tax evasion or avoidance.
Ukrep je sorazmeren zastavljenim ciljem, ker ni namenjen splošni uporabi, ampak samo za zelo specifične postopke v sektorju, ki povzroča resne težave v zvezi z izogibanjem davkom ali davčnimi utajami.
The measure should not, in the Commission’s view, have any adverse impact on the prevention of fraud at the retail level or in other sectors or in other Member States.
Po mnenju Komisije ukrep ne bi smel negativno vplivati na preprečevanje goljufij na maloprodajni ravni ali v drugih sektorjih ali drugih državah članicah.
The authorisation should be limited in time until 31 December 2016.
Dovolitev te izjeme bi morala biti časovno omejena, in sicer do 31. decembra 2016.
In the event that Romania requires a further extension beyond 2016, a report together with the extension request should be submitted to the Commission no later than 1 April 2016.
Če Romunija zahteva dodatno podaljšanje ukrepa po letu 2016, bi bilo treba Komisiji najkasneje 1. aprila 2016 predložiti poročilo, skupaj z zahtevo za podaljšanje.
In light of the experience gained up to that date, an assessment should be made on whether or not the derogation remains justified.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih do navedenega datuma, bi bilo treba oceniti, ali je izjema še naprej upravičena.
The derogation has no adverse impact on the Union's own resources accruing from VAT,
Odstopanje nima negativnega vpliva na lastna sredstva Unije, pridobljena od DDV –
By way of derogation from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Romania is hereby authorised until 31 December 2016 to designate the taxable person to whom the supplies of goods or services referred to in Article 2 of this Decision are made as the person liable for the payment of the tax.
Z odstopanjem od člena 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES se Romuniji dovoli izjema, da kot osebe, zavezane k plačilu davka, do 31. decembra 2016 določa davčne zavezance, katerim se dobavljajo blago ali storitve iz člena 2 tega sklepa.
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to supplies of wood products by taxable persons including standing timber, round or cleft working wood, fuel wood, timber products, as well as square edged or chipped wood and wood in the rough, processed or semi-manufactured wood.
Odstopanje, določeno v členu 1, se uporablja za dobavo lesnih proizvodov davčnih zavezancev, vključno z neposekanim lesom, zaobljenim ali razpokanim lesom za obdelavo, lesom za kurjavo, lesnimi proizvodi in tramovi ali iverkami ter lesom v surovem stanju, predelanim ali polpredelanim lesom.
Any request for the extension of the measure provided for in this Decision shall be submitted to the Commission no later than 1 April 2016, and shall be accompanied by a report which includes an assessment of the efficiency of the measure and an evaluation of the risk of fraud in the wood sector.
Vsaka zahteva za podaljšanje ukrepa, določenega v tem sklepu, se predloži Komisiji najpozneje do 1. aprila 2016 in se ji priloži poročilo, ki vključuje oceno učinkovitosti ukrepa in oceno tveganja goljufij v lesnem sektorju.
Council Implementing Decision 2010/583/EU of 27 September 2010 authorising Romania to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 256, 30.9.2010, p. 27).
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2010/583/EU z dne 27. septembra 2010 o dovolitvi Romuniji, da uvede posebni ukrep izjeme od člena 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 256, 30.9.2010, str. 27).
authorising Luxembourg to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
o dovoljenju Luksemburgu, da uvede posebni ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost
In accordance with Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission informed the other Member States of the request made by Luxembourg by letter dated 9 November 2012.
V skladu s členom 395(2) Direktive 2006/112/ES je Komisija z dopisom z dne 9. novembra 2012 o zahtevku Luksemburga obvestila druge države članice.
By letter dated 12 November 2012, the Commission notified Luxembourg that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 12. novembra 2012 Luksemburg uradno obvestila, da ima na voljo vse informacije, potrebne za presojo zahtevka.
According to Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Member States, which have not exercised the option under Article 14 of Second Council Directive 67/228/EEC [2], may exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 5000 or the equivalent in national currency and may also grant graduated tax relief to taxable persons whose annual turnover exceeds the ceiling fixed by them for its application.
V skladu s členom 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES lahko države članice, ki niso uporabile izbire iz člena 14 Druge direktive Sveta 67/228/EGS [2], davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet ni višji od 5000 EUR ali protivrednosti v nacionalni valuti, oprostijo od plačila DDV, odobrijo pa lahko tudi progresivno davčno olajšavo davčnim zavezancem, katerih letni promet presega zgornjo mejo, ki so jo v zvezi s tem določile.
Luxembourg has informed the Commission that it currently exempts from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 10000 and that it makes use of the option of granting graduated tax relief with respect to taxable persons whose annual turnover is between EUR 10000 and EUR 25000. Luxembourg has requested the authorisation to exempt from VAT, as a derogating measure, taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 25000.
Luksemburg je obvestil Komisijo, da so trenutno plačila DDV oproščeni davčni zavezanci, katerih letni promet znaša največ 10000 EUR in da uporablja možnost dodelitve progresivne davčne olajšave davčnim zavezancem, katerih letni promet znaša med 10000 EUR in 25000 EUR. Luksemburg je zaprosil za dovoljenje, da kot ukrep odstopanja davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet znaša največ 25000 EUR, oprosti plačila DDV.
A higher threshold for the special scheme is a simplification measure, in so far as it may significantly reduce the VAT obligations of small businesses and would enable Luxembourg to cease applying the graduated tax relief scheme that is burdensome for businesses.
Višji prag v okviru posebne sheme je ukrep za poenostavitev, v kolikor lahko znatno zmanjša obveznosti glede DDV za mala podjetja in bi omogočil Luksemburgu, da preneha uporabljati shemo za progresivno davčno olajšavo, ki obremenjuje podjetja.
Taxable persons should be still able to opt for the normal VAT arrangements.
Davčni zavezanci bi morali imeti možnost, da še vedno izberejo splošno ureditev glede DDV.
On 29 October 2004, the Commission has adopted a proposal for a Council Directive amending Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC [3] with a view to simplifying valued added tax obligations, which included provisions aimed at allowing Member States to set the annual turnover ceiling for the VAT exemption scheme at up to EUR 100000 or the equivalent in national currency, with the possibility of updating that amount each year.
Komisija je 29. oktobra 2004 sprejela predlog Direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 77/388/EGS [3] z namenom poenostavitve obveznosti glede davka na dodano vrednost, ki je vseboval določbe, ki državam članicam omogočajo, da določijo zgornjo mejo letnega prometa v okviru sheme oprostitev DDV v višini do 100000 EUR ali protivrednosti v nacionalni valuti, pri čemer se lahko ta znesek vsako leto posodobi.
This Decision is in line with that proposal.
Ta sklep je v skladu z navedenim predlogom.
The derogating measure has only a negligible effect on the overall amount of tax collected at the stage of final consumption and will not adversely affect the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT,
Ukrep odstopanja ima zgolj zanemarljiv učinek na skupni znesek davčnih prihodkov, zbranih na ravni končne potrošnje, in ne bo negativno vplival na lastne vire Unije iz pobiranja DDV –
By way of derogation from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Luxembourg is authorised to exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 25000.
Z odstopanjem od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES se Luksemburgu dovoli, da davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet znaša največ 25000 EUR, oprosti plačila DDV.
This Decision shall apply until the date of entry into force of Union rules amending the amounts of the annual turnover ceilings below which taxable persons may qualify for VAT exemption or until 31 December 2016, whichever date is earlier.
Ta sklep se uporablja do dneva začetka veljavnosti pravil Unije o spremembi zgornjih mej letnega prometa, v okviru katerih so lahko davčni zavezanci oproščeni plačila DDV, ali do 31. decembra 2016, če ta datum nastopi prej.
Second Council Directive 67/228/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonization of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes, structure and procedures for application of the common system of value added tax (OJ 71, 14.4.1967, p. 1303/67).
Druga direktiva Sveta 67/228/EGS z dne 11. aprila 1967 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic glede prometnih davkov, strukture in postopkov za uporabo skupnega sistema davka na dodano vrednost (UL 71, 14.4.1967, str. 1303/67).
Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 1).
Šesta direktiva Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. Maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih - Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero (UL L 145, 13.6.1977, str. 1).
By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 24 October 2012, Luxembourg requested authorisation to apply a measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC, allowing Luxembourg to exempt from value added tax (VAT) taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 25000.
V dopisu, ki ga je generalni sekretariat Komisije evidentiral 24. oktobra 2012, je Luksemburg zaprosil za dovoljenje, da uporabi ukrep odstopanja od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES, ki bi Luksemburgu omogočil, da davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet znaša največ 25000 EUR, oprosti plačila davka na dodano vrednost (DDV).
Through that measure, those taxable persons would be exempted from all or some of the obligations in relation to VAT referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.
Na podlagi tega ukrepa bi bili ti davčni zavezanci oproščeni vseh ali nekaterih obveznosti v zvezi z DDV iz poglavij 2 do 6 naslova XI Direktive 2006/112/ES.
By a letter registered with the Commission’s Secretariat-General on 8 April 2013, Italy requested authorisation for a measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to continue to exempt from value added tax (VAT) certain taxable persons whose annual turnover falls below a certain threshold, and to raise this threshold from EUR 30000 to EUR 65000. Through that measure, those taxable persons would be exempt from certain or all of the obligations in relation to VAT referred to in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.
V dopisu, ki ga je generalni sekretariat Komisije evidentiral 8. aprila 2013, je Italija zaprosila za dovoljenje za ukrep odstopanja od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES, da bi bili lahko določeni davčni zavezanci, katerih letni promet je pod določenim pragom, še naprej oproščeni plačila davka na dodano vrednost (DDV), in da bi se ta prag povišal s 30000 EUR na 65000 EUR. Na podlagi tega ukrepa bi bili ti davčni zavezanci oproščeni določenih ali vseh obveznosti v zvezi z DDV iz poglavij 2 do 6 naslova XI Direktive 2006/112/ES.
The Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 10 June 2013 of the request made by Italy.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. junija 2013 obvestila druge države članice o zahtevi Italije.
By letter dated 14 June 2013, the Commission notified Italy that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 14. junija 2013 uradno obvestila Italijo, da ima na voljo vse informacije, potrebne za presojo zahtevka.
A special scheme for small enterprises is already available to Member States under Title XII of Directive 2006/112/EC.
V naslovu XII Direktive 2006/112/ES je državam članicam že na voljo posebna shema za mala podjetja.
The extended measure derogates from Article 285 of that Directive in its application to Italy only in so far as the annual turnover threshold for the scheme is higher than the EUR 5000 threshold.
Razširjeni ukrep, ki se uporablja za Italijo, odstopa od člena 285 navedene direktive samo, če je prag letnega prometa v shemi višji od praga 5000 EUR.
For the sake of making the measure available to a greater number of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), and thereby corresponding to the objectives of Commission Communication entitled ‘ “Think Small First” — A “Small Business Act” for Europe’, Italy should be authorised to increase the annual turnover threshold under which certain taxable persons can be VAT exempt from EUR 30000 to EUR 65000.
Da bi bil ukrep na voljo večjemu številu malih in srednjih podjetij (MSP) in bi tako ustrezal ciljem v sporočilu Komisije z naslovom „Najprej pomisli na male“ – „Akt za mala podjetja“ za Evropo, bi bilo treba Italiji dovoliti, da poviša prag letnega prometa, pod katerim je mogoče določene davčne zavezance oprostiti plačila DDV, s 30000 EUR na 65000 EUR.
On 29 October 2004 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC [4] with a view to simplifying the value added tax obligations, which included provisions aimed at allowing Member States to set the annual turnover threshold for the VAT exemption scheme at up to EUR 100000 or the equivalent in national currency, with the possibility of updating that amount each year.
Komisija je 29. oktobra 2004 sprejela predlog direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 77/388/EGS [4] za poenostavitev obveznosti glede davka na dodano vrednost, ki je vseboval določbe, ki bi državam članicam omogočale, da določijo prag letnega prometa za oprostitev plačila DDV v višini do 100000 EUR ali protivrednosti zneska v nacionalni valuti, z možnostjo posodobitve tega zneska vsako leto.
The extension request submitted by Italy is compatible with that proposal, on which the Council has not yet been able to reach an agreement.
Zahteva za podaljšanje, ki jo je predložila Italija, je skladna z navedenim predlogom, v zvezi s katerim Svet še ni mogel doseči soglasja.
From information provided by Italy, the derogating measure only has a negligible impact on the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the final stage of consumption and has no impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT,
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Italija, ima ukrep odstopanja le zanemarljiv učinek na skupni znesek davčnih prihodkov, zbranih na ravni končne potrošnje, in ne vpliva na lastna sredstva Unije, pridobljena od DDV –