natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thirdly, the public service contracts impose specific obligations on RTP.
Tretjič, pogodbi o izvajanju javne službe javni televiziji RTP nalagata posebne obveznosti.
For example, RTP must maintain audiovisual archives, introduce technological innovations in its equipment and activities, support the S. Carlos National Theatre and to provide other services to be specified on an ad hoc basis.
Na primer, javna televizija RTP mora hraniti avdiovizualne arhive, pri svoji opremi in dejavnostih uvajati tehnološke inovacije, podpirati nacionalno gledališko ustanovo S. Carlos in nuditi druge storitve, ki bodo vsaka posebej podrobneje določene.
Article 5 of Law No 58/90 assigned to RTP the concession for public service broadcasting for a period of 15 years, renewable for a further period of 15 years and covering the frequencies corresponding to the first and second channels.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 58/90 je javni televiziji RTP podelil koncesijo za storitve javne televizije za obdobje petnajstih let, ki jo je mogoče obnoviti za nadaljnjih petnajst let in vključuje tudi frekvence, potrebne za oddajanje prvega in drugega kanala.
Article 4 of Law No 21/92 provides that RTP is the concessionaire for public service television broadcasting.
Člen 4 Zakona št. 21/92 določa, da je javna televizija RTP koncesionar za storitve javne radiotelevizije.
Clause 1(a) of the public service contracts confirms that RTP is the provider of the public service television [33].
Klavzula 1(a) pogodb o izvajanju javne službe potrjuje, da je javna televizija RTP ponudnik storitev javne televizije [33].
The public service contracts [34] provide for the setting up of a Public Opinion Council (Conselho de Opinião) consisting of representatives from the different sections of public opinion that may intervene in order to assess whether RTP is complying with its general and specific public service television broadcasting obligations.
Pogodbi o izvajanju javne službe [34] določata ustanovitev Sveta za javno mnenje (Conselho de Opinião), sestavljenega iz predstavnikov različnih skupin javnega mnenja, ki lahko posredujejo in ocenijo, ali javna televizija RTP izpolnjuje svoje splošne in posebne obveznosti javne radiotelevizije.
RTP is required to provide the Minister for Finance with a Public Business Plan and Budget for the fulfilment of its public service mission, (Plano de Actividades e Orçamento do Serviço Público) for the following year, accompanied by opinions issued by RTP’s board of auditors and the Public Opinion Council.
Javna televizija RTP mora ministru za finance predložiti javni poslovni načrt in proračun za izvajanje svoje naloge javne službe (Plano de Actividades e Orçamento do Serviço Público) za naslednje leto; priloženo mora biti tudi mnenje revizijskega sveta javne televizije RTP in Sveta za javno mnenje.
Furthermore, it has to provide a report on its compliance with its public service obligations during the previous year (Relatório sobre o Cumprimento das Obrigacões do Serviço Público, (the ‘public service reports’), accompanied by an opinion of RTP’s board of auditors [35].
Poleg tega mora predložiti poročilo o izpolnjevanju svojih obveznosti javne službe za preteklo leto (Relatório sobre o Cumprimento das Obrigacões do Serviço Público, v nadaljnjem besedilu: poročila o izvajanju javne službe) s priloženim mnenjem revizijskega sveta javne televizije RTP [35].
The Minister for Finance and the member of the government responsible for the media are required to verify compliance with the public service contracts.
Minister za finance in član vlade, ki je pristojen za sredstva javnega obveščanja, morata preveriti skladnost s pogodbama o izvajanju javne službe.
The Inspector-General of Finances is required to audit the financial plan.
Glavni inšpektor za finance mora pregledati finančni načrt.
Furthermore, an annual audit on the public service reports has to be conducted by an external specialised auditor [36].
Poleg tega mora zunanji specializirani revizor izvesti letno revizijo poročil o izvajanju javne službe [36].
The new public service contract also provides for sanctions to be imposed by Portugal for breach of contract in the form of fines, seizure, redemption or termination of the contract.
Nova pogodba o izvajanju javne službe določa tudi sankcije v obliki glob, zaplembe, odplačila ali prenehanja pogodbe, ki jih Portugalska naloži za kršitev pogodbe.
During the period 1992 to 1998, RTP had external audits on all its annual accounts by an independent auditor.
V obdobju 1992–1998 je javna televizija RTP pri neodvisnem revizorju naročila zunanje revizije vseh svojih letnih računovodskih izkazov.
Portugal also argues that all public service reports during that period were accompanied by an opinion of RTP’s Board of Auditors and by an audit of the Inspector General of Finance (Inspecção-Geral de Finanças), the latter being independent of RTP.
Portugalska tudi trdi, da so bila vsem poročilom o izvajanju javne službe v zadevnem obdobju priložena mnenja revizijskega sveta javne televizije RTP in revizije generalnega inšpektorja za finance (Inspecção-Geral de Finanças), ki je neodvisen od javne televizije RTP.
The situation as regards the external audits of the public service reports can be described as follows:
Stanje glede zunanjih revizij poročil o izvajanju javne službe je mogoče opisati, kot sledi:
The 1993 and the 1994 public service reports contained a compliance statement by that RTP’s public service obligations were fulfilled, but only by RTP’s management.
Poročili o izvajanju javne službe za leti 1993 in 1994 sta vsebovali izjavi o skladnosti, v katerih je bilo navedeno, da je javna televizija RTP izpolnila svoje obveznosti javne službe, vendar sta bili to izjavi uprave javne televizije RTP.
For the years 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998, the public service report contained compliance statements by an external auditor independent to the company, Maia, Mesquita & Associados — (Revisor Oficial das Contas), that that the audit did not disclose any matters that would significantly affect the calculation of the compensation payments to RTP referred to in those reports for those years.
V letih 1995, 1996, 1997 in 1998 so poročila o izvajanju javne službe vsebovala izjave o skladnosti s strani zunanjih neodvisnih revizorjev, Maia, Mesquita & Associados – (Revisor Oficial das Contas), v teh izjavah pa je bilo navedeno, da z revizijo ni bilo ugotovljeno nič takega, kar bi bistveno vplivalo na izračun denarnih nadomestil javni televiziji RTP iz teh poročil za ta leta.
They were carried out for that period by Pedro Roque SROC, an external auditor, that is independent of RTP [38].
Revizije za to obdobje je izvedel neodvisni zunanji revizor Pedro Roque SROC [38].
Portugal also provided a synthesis report summarising the audit results for all the years.
Portugalska je predložila tudi zbirno poročilo, v katerem so bili povzeti vsi rezultati revizij za vsa zadevna leta.
The mandate of the audits 1992-97 was, for each year in question, to assess whether RTP fulfilled its mandate as stipulated in the public service contracts in force at the time and whether there was a correspondence between the public service costs and the compensation payments.
Cilj revizij za leta 1992–1997 je bil oceniti, ali je javna televizija v vsakem zadevnem letu izpolnila svoje obveznosti iz takrat veljavnih pogodb o izvajanju javne službe in ali obstaja povezava med stroški javne službe in denarnimi nadomestili.
The external audits listed the public service obligations resulting from the public service contracts, took into account the various laws governing RTP’s public service obligations (for example, the Television Act No 58/90 of 7 September 1990) as well as the Public Business Plan and Budget (Plano de Actividades e Orçamento do Serviço Público) and the public service reports.
Zunanje revizije so navajale obveznosti javne službe, ki so izhajale iz pogodb o izvajanju javne službe, in upoštevale različne zakone, ki so urejali obveznosti javne službe televizije RTP (na primer Zakon o televiziji št. 58/90 z dne 7. septembra 1990), javni poslovni načrt in proračun (Plano de Actividades e Orçamento do Serviço Público) ter poročila o izvajanju javne službe.
The external audits examined whether the public service obligations were respected.
Zunanje revizije so preučile, ali so bile spoštovane obveznosti javne službe.
The reports made a comparison with the compensation payments by Portugal compared to the costs established in the public service reports.
V poročilih so bile narejene primerjave med denarnimi nadomestili, ki jih je dodeljevala Portugalska, in stroški iz poročil o izvajanju javne službe.
For all the years under investigation, i.e. 1992-97, the audits come to the conclusion that RTP essentially fulfilled its main broadcasting obligations.
Za vsa leta, ki so bila predmet revizije, tj. leta v obdobju 1992–1997, je bilo z revizijami ugotovljeno, da je javna televizija RTP v glavnem izpolnila svoje glavne obveznosti glede razširjanja televizijskih programov.
The audits are published on the ERC website [40].
Revizije so objavljene na spletni strani regulativnega organa ERC [40].
Likewise did the BDO Binder report not point to any overcompensation for the public service provided.
V poročilu revizorja BDO Binder je bilo prav tako ugotovljeno, da nadomestila, ki so bila izplačana za opravljeno javno službo, niso bila prekomerna.
Article 5 of Law No 21/92 confers on RTP the right to receive compensation for its public service obligations.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 21/92 javni televiziji RTP daje pravico do denarnih nadomestil za izvajanje obveznosti javne službe.
That right is confirmed in the public service contracts.
Ta pravica je potrjena v pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe.
In addition to the system of annual compensation payments (see recital 19 above), the public service contracts provide for funding by Portugal for:
Poleg sistema letnih denarnih nadomestil (glej uvodno izjavo 19) pogodbi o izvajanju javne službe določata tudi, da Portugalska financira:
the payment of specific services under agreements to provide services signed or to be signed by the public administration and RTP [41];
plačilo posebnih storitev v skladu s pogodbami o zagotavljanju storitev, ki jih podpišeta ali bosta podpisali javna uprava in javna televizija RTP [41];
State participation in all investments made by RTP, particularly those for the infrastructures required for the operation of the production and broadcasting centres in the autonomous regions of Azores and Madeira, the audiovisual archives and RTP’s international broadcasts and other technological investments that RTP is required to make [42].
državno udeležbo v vseh naložbah javne televizije RTP, zlasti naložbah v infrastrukturo, ki je potrebna za delovanje produkcijskih centrov in centrov za oddajanje televizijskih programov v avtonomnih regijah Azorov in Madeire, avdiovizualne arhive in mednarodno oddajanje javne televizije RTP, ter drugih tehnoloških naložbah, ki jih mora izvesti javna televizija RTP [42].
In order to determine the costs and revenues of the public service obligations that qualify for compensation payments, RTP applies an analytical accounting system.
Javna televizija RTP za določanje stroškov in prihodkov, ki izhajajo iz obveznosti javne službe in na podlagi katerih je upravičena do izplačila nadomestila, uporablja analitični računovodski sistem.
The public service contracts specify the criteria for calculating the eligible costs for compensation in respect of each public service obligation [43].
Pogodbi o izvajanju javne službe za vsako obveznost javne službe določata merila za izračun stroškov, upravičenih do nadomestila [43].
On the basis of the analytical accounting system mentioned in the previous recital, RTP allocates costs and revenues (for example, personnel and equipment) to cover a defined number of activities (such as management of programming, direct and indirect programme costs, diffusion costs, emission costs, marketing costs and overheads).
Na podlagi analitičnega računovodskega sistema iz prejšnje uvodne izjave javna televizija RTP razporedi stroške in prihodke (npr. osebje in opremo) na določeno število dejavnosti (upravljanje programskih vsebin, neposredni in posredni stroški programov, stroški razširjenosti, stroški oddajanja, stroški trženja in upravni stroški).
The direct costs of the different activities are divided between the different cost items (for example, RTP 1, RTP 2, RTPi and RTP África).
Neposredni stroški različnih dejavnosti so razdeljeni med različne stroškovne postavke (na primer kanale RTP 1, RTP 2, RTPi in RTP África).
The indirect costs are allocated to the cost items on the basis of consistent analytical criteria (for example, the number of broadcasting hours) [44].
Posredni stroški so dodeljeni stroškovnim postavkam na podlagi doslednega analitičnega merila (na primer števila ur oddajanja) [44].
The analytical accounting system has the following characteristics:
Analitični računovodski sistem ima naslednje značilnosti:
under the public service contracts, only the net operating costs may be compensated for in accordance with the method described in the public service contracts.
v skladu s pogodbama o izvajanju javne službe se lahko nadomestijo samo neto stroški poslovanja, v skladu z metodo, ki je opisana v pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe.
The financial cost, the extraordinary expenditure and provisions not directly related to an activity are excluded from compensation [45];
Finančni stroški, izredni stroški in postavke, ki niso neposredno povezane z dejavnostjo, se pri nadomestilu ne upoštevajo [45];
in order to calculate the net reimbursable operating costs, RTP must deduct the operating revenues derived from each public service obligation;
da bi lahko izračunala neto stroške poslovanja, ki so upravičeni do nadomestila, mora javna televizija RTP odšteti prihodke iz poslovanja, pridobljene na podlagi vsake obveznosti javne službe;
under the old public service contract, no compensation was allowed for the general public service obligation to operate RTP 1 and RTP 2 and to cover the autonomous regions with one of the channels [46];
v skladu s staro pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe nadomestilo ni bilo dovoljeno za splošno obveznost javne službe glede delovanja kanalov RTP 1 in RTP 2 ter pokritje avtonomnih regij z enim od kanalov [46];
under the new public service contract, the operating costs of RTP 1 and RTP 2 can be compensated for, but no extra compensation is allowed in the event of the real net operating costs of RTP 1 and RTP 2 exceeding the planned cost [47].
v skladu s novo pogodbo o izvajanju javne službe je bilo nadomestilo za stroške poslovanja kanalov RTP 1 in RTP 2 dovoljeno, vendar za dejanske neto stroške poslovanja kanalov RTP 1 in RTP 2, ki so presegali načrtovane stroške, dodatno nadomestilo ni bilo mogoče [47].
RTP has reported on the net cost of providing the public service in the annual public service reports in line with the cost calculation method described in recitals 60-65.
Javna televizija RTP je o neto stroških zagotavljanja javnih storitev v letnih poročilih o izvajanju javne službe poročala v skladu z metodo izračuna stroškov iz uvodnih izjav 60–65.
The following table gives an overview of the costs of each public service activity for which RTP is entitled to receive compensation payments.
Naslednja preglednica obsega pregled stroškov vsake dejavnosti javne službe, za katero je javna televizija RTP upravičena do nadomestila.
Net reported and reimbursable costs of the public service
Neto prijavljeni in povračljivi stroški javne službe
Source: Portuguese authorities and the public service reports.
Vir: Portugalski organi in poročila o izvajanju javnih služb.
Operation of RTP International
Delovanje mednarodne televizije RTP
Direct broadcasting by RTP 1 to Azores and Madeira
Neposredno oddajanje kanala RTP 1 Azorom in Madeiri
Cooperation with Portuguese-speaking countries in Africa
Sodelovanje s portugalsko govorečimi državami v Afriki
Coverage differential
Razlika pri pokrivanju
Delegations/correspondents
Predstavniki/dopisniki
S. Carlos National Theatre Foundation
Nacionalna gledališka ustanova S. Carlos
Cinema promotion
Spodbujanje kinematografov
Broadcasting for specific entities
Oddajanje za določene subjekte
Net operating costs of RTP 1
Neto stroški poslovanja kanala RTP 1
Net operating costs of RTP 2
Neto stroški poslovanja kanala RTP 2
The following table gives an overview of RTP’s investments in equipment for its public service activities.
Naslednja preglednica obsega pregled naložb javne televizije RTP v opremo za izvajanje njenih dejavnosti javne službe.
It presents both the real investments in public service activities, as shown in the annual financial accounts, and the investments reported in the public service reports.
Predstavlja dejanske naložbe v dejavnosti javne službe, kot so prikazane v letnih finančnih poročilih, in naložbe, evidentirane v poročilih o izvajanju javne službe.
The real investments in public service activities were higher than the investments reported in the public service reports.
Dejanske naložbe v dejavnosti javne službe so bile višje od naložb, evidentiranih v poročilih o izvajanju javne službe.
Investments in public service activities
Naložbe v dejavnosti javne službe
Source: RTP financial accounts and public service reports.
Vir: Finančna poročila in poročila o izvajanju javne službe javne televizije RTP.
Public service reports
Poročila o izvajanju javne službe
The objective of the ad hoc measures was to compensate RTP for the public service obligations imposed on it and to finance its investments.
Cilj začasnih ukrepov je bil javni televiziji RTP povrniti stroške za obveznosti javne službe, ki so ji bile dodeljene, in financiranje njenih naložb.
Possible effects of the measures
Morebitne posledice ukrepov
In Portugal, the public service operator was not selected as a result of a competitive procedure in which all interested undertakings had the opportunity to state the amount of compensation they would require to operate a public service television broadcasting concession.
Na Portugalskem operater javne službe ni bil izbran v konkurenčnem postopku, v katerem so imela vsa zainteresirana podjetja možnost navedbe zneska nadomestila, ki bi ga zahtevala za upravljanje koncesije za storitve javne radiotelevizije.
RTP was appointed by the Government to provide public service television.
RTP je za zagotavljanje javne službe imenovala vlada.
Since 1992, both commercial and public service broadcasters have been active in the Portuguese television market.
Na portugalskem televizijskem trgu so bili od leta 1992 dejavni tako komercialni kot tudi javni izdajatelji televizijskega programa.
Apart from RTP, the commercial broadcasters SIC and TVI are licensed to broadcast television channels.
Poleg javne televizije RTP imata dovoljenje za razširjanje televizijskih programov še komercialni televiziji SIC in TVI.
SIC was the first private operator to start broadcasting on 6 October 1992.
Komercialna televizija SIC je bila prvi zasebni operater, oddajati pa je začela 6. oktobra 1992.
The measures in favour of RTP could have the effect of distorting competition in the television broadcasting market.
Možno je, da so ukrepi v korist javne televizije RTP na radiodifuzijskem trgu izkrivljali konkurenco.
Following the initiation of the Commission’s investigation procedure in this case several interested parties commented on the measures referred to in recitals 21-39.
Po začetku postopka preiskave s strani Komisije v tej zadevi je več zainteresiranih strani podalo svoje pripombe na ukrepe iz uvodnih izjav 21–39.
The following recitals provide an overview of the relevant comments received from the interested parties, categorised by measure.
Naslednje uvodne izjave podajajo pregled zadevnih pripomb zainteresiranih strani po ukrepih.
Only comments pertaining to the issues left open following the judgment of the Court in Case T-442/03 are referred to in this Section, namely those relating to the exemptions from notarial and registration charges and publication costs, as well as in relation to the other measures (the agreement with the social security scheme in 1993, capital injections in the period 1994 to 1997 and a loan in 1998), as referred to in Article 1 of Decision 2005/406/EC.
V tem delu so obravnavane samo pripombe glede vprašanj, ki so po sodbi Sodišča v zadevi T-442/03 ostala odprta, torej pripombe, ki se nanašajo na oprostitev plačila notarskih stroškov, registracijskih taks in stroškov objave, ter pripombe, ki se nanašajo na druge ukrepe (pogodbo s shemo socialne varnosti v letu 1993, kapitalske injekcije v obdobju 1994–1997 in posojilo v letu 1998), kakor so navedeni v členu 1 Odločbe 2005/406/ES.
These comments of interested parties include views submitted after the Commission’s first opening decision of 15 November 2001 as well as comments received after the publication of the invitation to submit comments on 24 December 2008 [49].
Te pripombe zainteresiranih strani vključujejo mnenja, ki so bila predložena po prvem sklepu Komisije o začetku postopka z dne 15. novembra 2001, pa tudi pripombe, prejete po objavi poziva k predložitvi pripomb 24. decembra 2008 [49].
SIC and TVI argued that the exemptions from notarial and registration charges are an exception from the rules that are normally applicable under Portuguese law for any modification in company statutes.
Komercialni televiziji SIC in TVI sta trdili, da je oprostitev plačila notarskih stroškov in registracijskih taks izjema od pravil, ki se v skladu s portugalsko zakonodajo uporabljajo za vsako spremembo statuta družbe.
TVI commented that RTP was also exempted from the payment of costs linked to the publication of the notarial deed.
Komercialna televizija TVI je pojasnila, da je bila javna televizija RTP oproščena tudi plačila stroškov, povezanih z objavo notarskega zapisa.
On the capital injections in the period 1994 to 1997, SIC, ACT, the Association of commercial broadcasters, the Italian commercial broadcaster Mediaset and TVI commented that no rational shareholder would have increased the capital of a company of the characteristics of RTP.
Glede kapitalskih injekcij v obdobju od leta 1994 do leta 1997 so komercialna televizija SIC, združenje komercialnih televizij ACT, italijanska komercialna televizija Mediaset in komercialna televizija TVI pojasnili, da noben razumni vlagatelj ne bi povečal kapitala družbe z značilnostmi javne televizije RTP.
The referred capital injections were made in a severely deficit company without a coherent restructuring plan to make the undertaking viable.
Zadevne kapitalske injekcije je prejela družba z velikim primanjkljajem in brez ustreznega načrta prestrukturiranja za vzpostavitev uspešnega poslovanja družbe.
Furthermore, as regards the loan in 1998, SIC argued that taking into account the fact that RTP was ‘technically bankrupt’ in 1996, no financial institution would have approved such a loan to RTP.
Poleg tega je komercialna televizija SIC glede posojila v letu 1998 trdila, da ob upoštevanju „tehničnega stečaja“, s katerim se je javna televizija RTP soočala v letu 1996, javni televiziji RTP nobena finančna ustanova ne bi odobrila takega posojila.
SIC, in particular, stressed the absence of external audits, which should have taken place on a regular basis.
Komercialna televizija SIC je poudarila zlasti pomanjkanje zunanjih revizij, ki bi se morale redno izvajati.
It also referred to flaws found for the year 1998 as described in the BDO Binder report for that year, the only existing external audit, which the Commission should have taken into account.
Navedla je tudi pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene za leto 1998 in opisane v poročilu revizorja BDO Binder za to leto, to poročilo pa je tudi edina obstoječa revizija, ki bi jo po mnenju komercialne televizije SIC Komisija morala upoštevati.
It pointed to several criticisms in the BDO Binder report for 1998, including, inter alia, an excess of the advertising limits for RTP television broadcasts.
Opozorila je na več kritik iz poročila revizorja BDO Binder za leto 1998, med drugim tudi na preseganje omejitve oglaševanja za televizijske programe javne televizije RTP.