natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That Regulation introduces new hazard classes and categories only partially corresponding to those used under those repealed Directives.
Navedena uredba uvaja nove razrede in kategorije nevarnosti, ki le delno ustrezajo razredom in kategorijam iz navedenih razveljavljenih direktiv.
Certain substances or mixtures would, however, not be classified under that system due to an absence of criteria within that framework.
Določene snovi ali zmesi pa ne bi bile razvrščene po tem sistemu, ker v tem okviru ni meril.
Annex I to Directive 96/82/EC therefore needs to be amended to align it to that Regulation while maintaining the existing level, or further increasing the level, of protection provided for in that Directive.
Zato je treba spremeniti Prilogo I k Direktivi 96/82/ES, da bo usklajena z navedeno uredbo, hkrati pa je treba ohraniti obstoječo raven ali še zvišati raven varstva, določenega v navedeni direktivi.
For the purpose of classifying upgraded biogas, any developments on standards under the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) should be taken into account.
Za namen razvrstitve izboljšanega bioplina bi bilo treba upoštevati razvoj na področju standardov v okviru Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo (CEN).
Unwanted effects from the alignment to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and subsequent adaptations to that Regulation having an impact on the classification of substances and mixtures may occur.
Lahko bi prišlo do neželenih učinkov uskladitve z Uredbo (ES) št. 1272/2008 in poznejšimi prilagoditvami z navedeno uredbo, ki bi vplivali na razvrščanje snovi in zmesi.
On the basis of criteria included in this Directive, the Commission should assess whether, notwithstanding their hazard classification, there are dangerous substances which do not present a major-accident hazard and, where appropriate, submit a legislative proposal to exclude the dangerous substance concerned from the scope of this Directive.
Na podlagi meril iz te direktive bi morala Komisija oceniti, ali obstajajo nevarne snovi, ki ne pomenijo nevarnosti večjih nesreč, ne glede na njihovo razvrstitev nevarnosti, in, kadar je ustrezno, predložiti zakonodajni predlog za izključitev zadevne nevarne snovi iz področja uporabe te direktive.
The assessment should start swiftly, in particular after the change of classification of a substance or mixture, in order to avoid unnecessary burdens for operators and competent authorities in the Member States.
Ocenjevanje bi se moralo začeti hitro, zlasti po spremenjeni razvrstitvi snovi ali zmesi, da se prepreči nepotrebno breme za upravljavce in pristojne organe v državah članicah.
Exclusions from the scope of this Directive should not prevent any Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures.
Izključitve iz področja uporabe te direktive državam članicam ne bi smele onemogočati, da ohranijo ali uvedejo strožje varstvene ukrepe.
Operators should have a general obligation to take all necessary measures to prevent major accidents, to mitigate their consequences and to take recovery measures.
Splošna obveznost upravljavcev bi morala biti, da sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za preprečevanje večjih nesreč in ublažitev ter odpravo njihovih posledic.
Where dangerous substances are present in establishments above certain quantities the operator should provide the competent authority with sufficient information to enable it to identify the establishment, the dangerous substances present and the potential dangers.
Kadar količina nevarnih snovi v organizacijah presega določene količine, bi moral upravljavec pristojnemu organu zagotoviti zadostne informacije, da ta lahko ugotovi, za katero organizacijo gre ter katere so nevarne snovi in morebitne nevarnosti.
The operator should also draw up and, where required by national law, send to the competent authority a major-accident prevention policy (MAPP) setting out the operator’s overall approach and measures, including appropriate safety management systems, for controlling major-accident hazards.
Poleg tega bi moral upravljavec pripraviti in, če to zahteva nacionalno pravo, predložiti pristojnemu organu politiko preprečevanja večjih nesreč (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MAPP), ki določa splošne pristope in ukrepe upravljavca, vključno z ustreznimi sistemi upravljanja varnosti za obvladovanje nevarnosti večjih nesreč.
When the operators identify and evaluate the major-accident hazards, consideration should also be given to the dangerous substances which may be generated during a severe accident within the establishment.
Kadar upravljavci ugotovijo in ocenijo nevarnosti večjih nesreč, bi morali upoštevati tudi nevarne snovi, ki bi v organizaciji utegnile nastati med hudo nesrečo.
Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage [9] is normally relevant for environmental damage caused by a major accident.
Običajno je za okoljsko škodo zaradi večje nesreče ustrezna Direktiva 2004/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode [9].
In order to reduce the risk of domino effects, where establishments are sited in such a way or so close together as to increase the likelihood of major accidents, or aggravate their consequences, operators should cooperate in the exchange of appropriate information and in informing the public, including neighbouring establishments that could be affected.
Da bi zmanjšali tveganje verižnih učinkov, kadar so organizacije razporejene na takšen način ali tako blizu skupaj, da se poveča verjetnost nastanka večjih nesreč ali so posledice še hujše, bi morali upravljavci sodelovati pri izmenjavi ustreznih informacij in pri obveščanju javnosti, vključno s sosednjimi organizacijami, na katere bi lahko nesreča vplivala.
In order to demonstrate that all that is necessary has been done to prevent major accidents, and to prepare emergency plans and response measures, the operator should, in the case of establishments where dangerous substances are present in significant quantities, provide the competent authority with information in the form of a safety report.
Za prikaz, da je bilo storjeno vse potrebno za preprečitev večjih nesreč, in za pripravo načrtov ukrepov ob nesrečah in ukrepov za odzivanje, bi moral upravljavec v primeru organizacije, v kateri so nevarne snovi prisotne v znatnih količinah, priskrbeti pristojnemu organu informacije v obliki varnostnega poročila.
That safety report should contain details of the establishment, the dangerous substances present, the installation or storage facilities, possible major-accident scenarios and risk analysis, prevention and intervention measures and the management systems available, in order to prevent and reduce the risk of major accidents and to enable the necessary steps to be taken to limit the consequences thereof.
To varnostno poročilo bi moralo vsebovati podrobnosti o organizaciji, prisotnih nevarnih snoveh, obratu ali prostorih za skladiščenje, možnih potekih večjih nesreč in analizi tveganj, preventivnih in intervencijskih ukrepih ter sistemih upravljanja, ki so na voljo, da bi se preprečilo in zmanjšalo tveganje večjih nesreč in omogočilo izvajanje potrebnih ukrepov za omejitev njihovih posledic.
The risk of a major accident could be increased by the probability of natural disasters associated with the location of the establishment.
Tveganje večje nesreče bi lahko bilo še večje, če bi bile na lokaciji organizacije verjetne naravne nesreče.
This should be considered during the preparation of major-accident scenarios.
To bi bilo treba upoštevati pri pripravi potekov večjih nesreč.
To prepare for emergencies, in the case of establishments where dangerous substances are present in significant quantities, it is necessary to establish internal and external emergency plans and to establish procedures to ensure that those plans are tested and revised as necessary and implemented in the event of a major accident or the likelihood thereof.
Zaradi priprave na nesreče v primeru organizacij, v katerih so nevarne snovi prisotne v znatnih količinah, je treba izdelati načrte ukrepov v organizaciji in zunaj nje ob nesrečah ter določiti postopke, da se zagotovi preverjanje in po potrebi spreminjanje teh načrtov ter njihovo izvajanje v primeru večje nesreče ali kadar obstaja verjetnost večje nesreče.
The staff of an establishment should be consulted on the internal emergency plan and the public concerned should have the opportunity to give its opinion on the external emergency plan.
O načrtu ukrepov v organizaciji ob nesrečah bi se bilo treba posvetovati z zaposlenimi, poleg tega pa bi morala tudi zadevna javnost imeti možnost izraziti svoje mnenje o načrtu ukrepov zunaj organizacije ob nesrečah.
Sub-contracting may have an impact on the safety of an establishment.
Na varnost organizacije bi lahko vplivalo sklepanje pogodb s podizvajalci.
Member States should require operators to take this into account when drafting a MAPP, a safety report or an internal emergency plan.
Države članice bi morale od upravljavcev zahtevati, da to upoštevajo pri oblikovanju MAPP, varnostnega poročila ali načrta ukrepov v organizaciji ob nesrečah.
When considering the choice of appropriate operating methods, including those for monitoring and control, operators should take into account available information on best practices.
Upravljavci bi morali pri izbiranju ustreznih načinov delovanja, vključno s tistimi za spremljanje in nadzor, upoštevati razpoložljive informacije o najboljših praksah.
In order to provide greater protection for residential areas, areas of substantial public use and the environment, including areas of particular natural interest or sensitivity, it is necessary for land-use or other relevant policies applied in the Member States to ensure appropriate distances between such areas and establishments presenting such hazards and, where existing establishments are concerned, to implement, if necessary, additional technical measures so that the risk to persons or the environment is maintained at an acceptable level.
Za zagotovitev boljšega varstva bivalnih območij, območij za pretežno javno uporabo in okolja, vključno z območji posebnega pomena za ohranjanje narave ali posebej občutljivih območij, je treba pri rabi prostora ali pri drugih zadevnih politikah, ki se izvajajo v državah članicah, ohraniti primerno razdaljo med takšnimi območji in organizacijami, ki pomenijo take nevarnosti, ter v primeru obstoječih organizacij po potrebi izvajati dodatne tehnične ukrepe, da se tveganje za ljudi ali okolje ohrani na sprejemljivi ravni.
Sufficient information about the risks and technical advice on these risks should be taken into account when decisions are taken.
Pri sprejemanju odločitev bi bilo treba upoštevati zadostne informacije o tveganjih in tehnične nasvete o teh tveganjih.
Where possible, to reduce administrative burdens, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, procedures and measures should be integrated with those under other relevant Union legislation.
Za zmanjšanje upravnega bremena, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, bi bilo treba, kadar je mogoče, postopke in ukrepe združiti s postopki in ukrepi v skladu z drugo zadevno zakonodajo Unije.
In order to promote access to environmental information under the Convention of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters (the Aarhus Convention), which was approved on behalf of the Union by Council Decision 2005/370/EC of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters [10], the level and quality of information to the public should be improved.
Za spodbujanje dostopa do informacij o okolju v skladu s Konvencijo Ekonomske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Aarhuška konvencija), ki je bila v imenu Unije odobrena s Sklepom Sveta 2005/370/ES z dne 17. februarja 2005 o sklenitvi Konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah, v imenu Evropske skupnosti [10], bi bilo treba izboljšati raven in kakovost informacij za javnost.
In particular, persons likely to be affected by a major accident should be given sufficient information on the correct action to be taken in that event.
Zlasti osebe, za katere obstaja verjetnost, da jih bo prizadela večja nesreča, bi morale imeti na voljo zadostne informacije o tem, kako naj pravilno ukrepajo v takšnem primeru.
Member States should make information available on where to find information on the rights of persons affected by a major accident.
Države članice bi morale dati na voljo informacije o tem, kje se da pridobiti informacije o pravicah oseb, ki jih večja nesreča prizadene.
Information disseminated to the public should be worded clearly and intelligibly.
Informacije, ki se razširjajo javnosti, bi morale biti izražene jasno in razumljivo.
In addition to providing information in an active way, without the public having to submit a request, and without precluding other forms of dissemination, it should also be made available permanently and kept up to date electronically.
Poleg dejavnega zagotavljanja informacij, pri čemer javnosti ni treba predložiti zahtevka in niso izključene druge oblike razširjanja, bi morale biti te informacije trajno na voljo in se elektronsko posodabljati.
At the same time there should be appropriate confidentiality safeguards, to address security-related concerns, among others.
Obenem bi morali obstajati ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi, da se med drugim odpravijo pomisleki, povezani z varnostjo.
The way information is managed should be in line with the Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS) initiative introduced by the Commission Communication of 1 February 2008 entitled ‘Towards a Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS)’.
Način upravljanja informacij bi moral biti v skladu s pobudo za skupni okoljski informacijski sistem (SEIS), ki je bila uvedena s sporočilom Komisije z dne 1. februarja 2008 z naslovom „Za skupni okoljski informacijski sistem (SEIS)“.
It should also be in line with Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) [11] and its implementing rules, aimed at enabling the sharing of environmental spatial information among public sector organisations and better facilitating public access to spatial information across the Union.
Biti bi moral tudi v skladu z Direktivo 2007/2/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. marca 2007 o vzpostavitvi infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v Evropski skupnosti (INSPIRE) [11] in njenimi izvedbenimi pravili, katerih cilj je omogočanje izmenjave okoljsko-prostorskih informacij med organizacijami javnega sektorja ter spodbujanje javnega dostopa do prostorskih informacij v Uniji.
Information should be held on a publicly available database at Union level, which will also facilitate monitoring and reporting on implementation.
Informacije bi se morale hraniti v javno dostopni zbirki podatkov na ravni Unije, kar bo tudi olajšalo spremljanje in poročanje o izvajanju.
In line with the Aarhus Convention, effective public participation in decision-making is necessary to enable the public concerned to express, and the decision-maker to take account of, opinions and concerns that may be relevant to those decisions, thereby increasing the accountability and transparency of the decision-making process and contributing to public awareness of environmental issues and support for the decisions taken.
V skladu z Aarhuško konvencijo je potrebno učinkovito sodelovanje javnosti pri sprejemanju odločitev, da se zadevni javnosti omogoči, da izrazi mnenja in pomisleke, ki lahko zadevajo te odločitve, ter da jih nosilec odločitev upošteva, s čimer se povečata odgovornost in preglednost v procesu odločanja, ter da se prispeva k ozaveščanju javnosti o okoljskih vprašanjih in k javni podpori sprejetim odločitvam.
In order to ensure that adequate response measures are taken if a major accident occurs, the operator should immediately inform the competent authority and communicate the information necessary to enable it to assess the effects of that accident on human health and on the environment.
Upravljavec bi moral za zagotovitev, da se ob večji nesreči sprejmejo ustrezni ukrepi za odzivanje, nemudoma obvestiti pristojni organ in mu sporočiti potrebne informacije, da bi lahko ocenil učinke te nesreče na človekovo zdravje in okolje.
Local authorities have an interest in the prevention of major accidents and mitigation of their consequences and can have an important role to play.
Preprečevanje večjih nesreč in ublažitev njihovih posledic je v interesu lokalnih organov, ki lahko imajo na tem področju pomembno vlogo.
This should be taken into account by the Member States in the implementation of this Directive.
To bi morale države članice upoštevati pri izvajanju te direktive.
In order to facilitate the exchange of information and to prevent future accidents of a similar nature, Member States should forward information to the Commission regarding major accidents occurring on their territory, so that the Commission can analyse the hazards involved, and operate a system for the distribution of information concerning, in particular, major accidents and lessons learned from them.
Države članice bi morale za lajšanje izmenjave informacij in preprečitev podobnih nesreč v prihodnosti Komisiji posredovati informacije v zvezi z večjimi nesrečami, ki se zgodijo na njihovem ozemlju, da bi lahko Komisija analizirala s tem povezane nevarnosti ter upravljala sistem za razpošiljanje informacij, zlasti o večjih nesrečah in pridobljenih spoznanjih v zvezi z njimi.
That exchange of information should also cover ‘near misses’ which Member States regard as being of particular technical interest for preventing major accidents and limiting their consequences.
Ta izmenjava informacij bi morala vključevati tudi „skorajšnje nesreče“, za katere države članice menijo, da so s tehničnega vidika zanimive za preprečitev večjih nesreč in omejitev njihovih posledic.
Member States and the Commission should strive to ensure the completeness of the information held on information systems established to facilitate the exchange of information on major accidents.
Države članice in Komisija bi si morale prizadevati, da bi bile informacije v teh informacijskih sistemih, namenjenih izmenjavi informacij o večjih nesrečah, celovite.
Member States should determine the competent authorities responsible for ensuring that operators fulfil their obligations.
Države članice bi morale določiti pristojne organe, odgovorne za zagotavljanje, da upravljavci izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti.
The competent authorities and the Commission should cooperate in activities in support of implementation such as the development of appropriate guidance and exchanges of best practice.
Pristojni organi in Komisija bi morali sodelovati pri dejavnostih v podporo izvajanju, kot sta razvoj ustreznih smernic in izmenjava najboljše prakse.
To avoid unnecessary administrative burden, information obligations should be integrated, where appropriate, with those under other relevant Union legislation.
Da bi preprečili nepotrebno upravno breme, bi bilo treba obveznosti obveščanja, kadar je ustrezno, združiti z obveznostmi obveščanja v skladu z drugo zadevno zakonodajo Unije.
Member States should ensure that competent authorities take the necessary measures in the event of non-compliance with this Directive.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da pristojni organi v primeru neskladnosti s to direktivo ustrezno ukrepajo.
In order to ensure effective implementation and enforcement, there should be a system of inspections, including a programme of routine inspections at regular intervals and non-routine inspections.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega izvajanja in izvrševanja bi bilo treba vzpostaviti sistem inšpekcijskih pregledov, vključno s programom rednih inšpekcijskih pregledov v rednih časovnih presledkih ter izrednih inšpekcijskih pregledov.
Where possible, inspections should be coordinated with those under other Union legislation, including Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) [12], where appropriate.
Inšpekcijski pregledi bi se morali po možnosti uskladiti z inšpekcijskimi pregledi v skladu z drugo zakonodajo Unije, vključno z Direktivo 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) [12], kadar je ustrezno.
Member States should ensure that sufficient staff is available with the skills and qualifications needed to carry out inspections effectively.
Države članice bi morale za učinkovito izvajanje inšpekcijskih pregledov zagotoviti dovolj usposobljenega in kvalificiranega osebja.
Competent authorities should provide appropriate support using tools and mechanisms for exchanging experience and consolidating knowledge, including at Union level.
Pristojni organi bi morali zagotoviti ustrezno podporo z orodji in mehanizmi za izmenjavo izkušenj ter okrepitev znanja, vključno na ravni Unije.
In order to take into account technical developments, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amending Annexes II to VI to adapt them to technical progress.
Da bi se upošteval tehnični razvoj, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastila, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme akte v zvezi s spremembo prilog II do VI, da bi jih prilagodila tehničnemu napredku.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers [13].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije [13].
Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and ensure that they are implemented.
Države članice bi morale določiti pravila o kaznih za kršitve nacionalnih določb, sprejetih v skladu s to direktivo, in zagotoviti njihovo izvajanje.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States and can, therefore, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, namreč zagotavljanja visoke ravni varstva človekovega zdravja in okolja, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.