natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Meat and edible meat offal of swine and bovine animals, salted, in brine, dried or smoked; edible flours and meals of meat or meat offals of domestic swine and bovine animals
Meso in užitni klavnični proizvodi prašičev in govedi, nasoljeni, v slanici, sušeni ali dimljeni; užitna moka in zdrob iz mesa ali iz klavničnih proizvodov domačih prašičev in govedi
Other Spelt (other than spelt for sowing), common wheat and meslin
Druga pira (razen pire za setev), navadna pšenica in soržica
of fowls of the species Gallus domesticus, uncooked,
kokoši in petelinov vrste Gallus domesticus, termično neobdelani
of domestic swine,
domačih prašičev
From 1 January until 31 December.
Od 1. januarja do 31. decembra.
of 4 October 2013
z dne 4. oktobra 2013
rejecting a refusal of the authorisation of a biocidal product containing difenacoum notified by the Netherlands in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o zavrnitvi predloga za zavrnitev izdaje dovoljenja za biocidni proizvod, ki vsebuje difenakum, ki ga je Nizozemska priglasila v skladu z Direktivo 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2013) 6409)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 6409)
Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC contains the list of active substances approved at Union level for inclusion in biocidal products.
Priloga I k Direktivi 98/8/ES vsebuje seznam aktivnih snovi, ki so odobrene na ravni Unije za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih.
Commission Directive 2008/81/EC of 29 July 2008 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include difenacoum as an active substance in Annex I thereto [2] added the active substance difenacoum for use in products belonging to product-type 14, Rodenticides, as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC.
Direktiva Komisije 2008/81/ES z dne 29. julija 2008 o spremembi Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za vključitev difenakuma kot aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi [2] je dodala aktivno snov difenakum za uporabo v proizvodih, ki spadajo v 14. vrsto proizvodov, rodenticidi, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi V k Direktivi 98/8/ES.
The company Edialux France submitted an application to France for authorisation of a product containing difenacoum as a paraffin block formulation (‘the contested product’) in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 98/8/EC.
Družba Edialux France je pri pristojnih organih Francije vložila vlogo za izdajo dovoljenja za proizvod, ki vsebuje difenakum v obliki parafinskega bloka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporni proizvod) v skladu s členom 8 Direktive 98/8/ES.
The name and reference numbers of the contested product in the Register for Biocidal Products (‘R4BP’) are indicated in the Annex to this Decision.
Ime in referenčna številka spornega proizvoda v registru biocidnih proizvodov („R4BP“) sta navedena v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
On 3 July 2012, Denka Registrations BV (‘the applicant’) submitted a complete application to the Netherlands for mutual recognition of the French authorisation of the contested product.
Denka Registrations B.V. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: predlagatelj) je 3. julija 2012 pri pristojnih organih Nizozemske vložil popolno vlogo za medsebojno priznanje dovoljenja Francije za sporni proizvod.
On 24 January 2013, the Netherlands notified the Commission, the other Member States and the applicant of its proposal to refuse the authorisation in accordance with Article 4(4) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Nizozemska je 24. januarja 2013 Komisijo, druge države članice in predlagatelja obvestila o svojem predlogu za zavrnitev dovoljenja v skladu s členom 4(4) Direktive 98/8/ES.
The Netherlands considered that the contested product does not meet the requirement of being sufficiently effective in accordance with Article 5(1) of Directive 98/8/EC, as its efficacy was not demonstrated in field or semi-field trials.
Nizozemska je menila, da sporni proizvod ne izpolnjuje zahteve po dovoljšni učinkovitosti v skladu s členom 5(1) Direktive 98/8/ES, saj njegova učinkovitost ni bila dokazana pri terenskih ali polterenskih preskusih.
According to the notification, efficacy of rodenticide products is a matter of particular concern for the Netherlands, as resistance problems have been reported both in rats and mice.
V skladu z obvestilom je učinkovitost proizvodov kot rodenticidov posebno pomembna za Nizozemsko, saj se je tako pri podganah kot pri miših poročalo o težavah odpornosti.
The Commission invited the other Member States and the applicant to submit comments to the notification in writing within 90 days in accordance with Article 27(1) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Komisija je povabila druge države članice in predlagatelja, da predložijo pisne pripombe na obvestilo v 90 dneh v skladu s členom 27(1) Direktive 98/8/ES.
Comments were submitted within that deadline by France, Belgium and the applicant.
V tem roku so pripombe predložile Francija, Belgija in predlagatelj.
The notification was also discussed between Commission representatives and representatives of Member States’ Competent Authorities for biocidal products in the meeting of the Product Authorisation and Mutual Recognition Facilitation Group of 25-26 February 2013, where the applicant was present.
O obvestilu so razpravljali tudi predstavniki Komisije in predstavniki pristojnih organov držav članic za biocidne proizvode na srečanju Skupine za poenostavitev medsebojnega priznavanja in izdajo dovoljenj za proizvode, ki je potekalo od 25. do 26. februarja 2013 in katerega se je udeležil tudi predlagatelj.
From the comments received, it follows that France assessed the product’s efficacy in accordance with the available EU guidance on efficacy evaluation of rodenticidal biocidal products [3].
Iz prejetih pripomb sledi, da je Francija ocenila učinkovitost proizvoda v skladu z razpoložljivimi smernicami EU o presoji učinkovitosti biocidnih proizvodov kot rodenticidov [3].
Although both laboratory and field studies performed with the product to be authorised are normally required when applying for authorisation of a rodenticide, field trials can be waived by read-across to data generated with another product authorised in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC containing the same active substance and already authorised for the same field of use.
Čeprav se za rodenticid, za katerega se je zaprosilo za izdajo dovoljenja, običajno zahtevajo laboratorijski in terenski preskusi, se terenski preskusi lahko opustijo samo z navzkrižnim branjem podatkov, pridobljenih z drugim rodenticidom, odobrenim v skladu z Direktivo 98/8/ES, ki vsebuje enako aktivno snov in za katerega je že bilo izdano dovoljenje za isto področje uporabe.
The conclusions on the efficacy of the contested product were therefore based on the read-across to data generated with another grain formulation rodenticide (Sorkil Avoine Speciale [4]) meeting the characteristics required by the abovementioned guidance document, for which field and semi-field tests on the target species proved the efficacy of the product.
Ugotovitve o učinkovitosti spornega proizvoda so temeljile na navzkrižnem branju podatkov, pridobljenih za drugo formulacijo rodenticida iz žitaric (Sorkil Avoine Speciale [4]), ki ima značilnosti, predpisane z zgoraj navedenimi smernicami, in za katerega so terenski in polterenski preskusi na ciljni vrsti dokazali učinkovitost proizvoda.
As requested by the guidance document, bait choice tests also demonstrated that palatability was not affected by the bait formulation and that the contested product was more palatable for mice and equally palatable for rats than the product Sorkil Avoine Speciale.
Kot je zahtevano v smernicah, so preskusi z izbiro vabe prav tako dokazali, da okusnost ni bila oškodovana z obliko vabe in da je bil sporni proizvod bolj okusen za miši in enako okusen za podgane kot proizvod Sorkil Avoine Speciale.
In the light of the above arguments, the Commission supports the conclusions of the assessment carried out by France and the other Member States having mutually recognised the French authorisation, considering the contested product sufficiently effective as required by Article 5(1) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Z vidika zgornjih utemeljitev Komisija podpira ugotovitve ocene, ki jo je izvedla Francija, in drugih držav članic, ki so vzajemno priznale francosko dovoljenje, ter meni, da je sporni proizvod dovolj učinkovit v skladu s členom 5(1) Direktive 98/8/ES.
The Commission therefore considers that the request by the Netherlands to refuse the authorisation cannot be justified on the grounds put forward.
Zato Komisija meni, da zahtevka Nizozemske za zavrnitev dovoljenja ni mogoče utemeljiti na podlagi predloženih razlogov.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za biocidne proizvode –
The proposal by the Netherlands to refuse the authorisation granted by France on 23 February 2012 of the product mentioned in the Annex, is rejected.
Predlog Nizozemske za zavrnitev dovoljenja, ki ga je Francija izdala 23. februarja 2012 za proizvod, naveden v Prilogi, se zavrne.
Done at Brussels, 4 October 2013.
V Bruslju, 4. oktobra 2013
See Technical Notes for Guidance on Product Evaluation.
Glej Technical Notes for Guidance on Product Evaluation.
Product Type 14: Efficacy Evaluation of Rodenticidal Biocidal Products, available on the website http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_activities/public-health/risk_assessment_of_Biocides/doc/TNsG/TNsG_PRODUCT_EVALUATION/Revised_Appendix_Chapter_7_PT14_2009.pdf
Product Type 14: Efficacy Evaluation of Rodenticidal Biocidal Products (Tehnične opombe kot smernice za ocenjevanje proizvoda. Dodatki k poglavju 7. 14. vrsta proizvodov: ocena učinkovitosti biocidnih proizvodov kot rodenticidov), na voljo na spletišču http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_activities/public-health/risk_assessment_of_Biocides/doc/TNsG/TNsG_PRODUCT_EVALUATION/Revised_Appendix_Chapter_7_PT14_2009.pdf
French application reference number in the Register for Biocidal Products: 2010/6309/6308/FR/AA/7742.
Referenčna številka francoske vloge v registru biocidnih proizvodov: 2010/6309/6308/FR/AA/7742.
Date of authorisation: 1 October 2011.
Datum dovoljenja: 1. oktober 2011.
Product for which the proposal by the Netherlands, to refuse the authorisation granted in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 98/8/EC, is rejected:
Predlog Nizozemske za zavrnitev dovoljenja za proizvod, izdanega v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 98/8/ES, se zavrne:
Product name in France
Ime proizvoda v Franciji
French application reference number in the Register for Biocidal Products
Francoska referenčna številka vloge v registru biocidnih proizvodov
Product name in the Netherlands
Ime proizvoda na Nizozemskem
Dutch application reference number in the Register for Biocidal Products
Nizozemska referenčna številka vloge v registru biocidnih proizvodov
France authorised the contested product on 23 February 2012.
Francija je dovoljenje za sporni proizvod izdala 23. februarja 2012.
The authorisation has subsequently been mutually recognised by Germany, Luxembourg, Belgium and Switzerland.
Dovoljenje so pozneje vzajemno priznali Nemčija, Luksemburg, Belgija in Švica.
of 11 October 2013
z dne 11. oktobra 2013
amending Decision 2005/7/EC authorising a method for grading pig carcasses in Cyprus as regards the alternative presentation of such carcasses
o spremembi Sklepa 2005/7/ES o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na Cipru v zvezi z alternativno predstavitvijo takšnih trupov
(notified under document C(2013) 6583)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 6583)
By Commission Decision 2005/7/EC [2], the use of an alternative presentation of pig carcasses in Cyprus was authorised.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2005/7/ES [2] je bilo izdano dovoljenje za uporabo alternativne predstavitve prašičjih trupov na Cipru.
Cyprus has requested the Commission to be authorised to provide for a presentation of pig carcasses different from the alternative presentation authorised in Article 2 of Decision 2005/7/EC and different from the standard presentation defined in the first paragraph of point B.III of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Ciper je Komisijo zaprosil za odobritev predstavitve prašičjih trupov, ki je drugačna od alternativne predstavitve, odobrene v členu 2 Odločbe 2005/7/ES, in drugačna od standardne predstavitve, opredeljene v prvem odstavku točke B.III Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007.
In accordance with the second paragraph of point B.III of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, Member States may be authorised to provide for a presentation of pig carcasses different from the standard presentation defined in the first paragraph of that point, where normal commercial practice in their territory differs from that standard presentation.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom točke B.III Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007 se lahko državam članicam odobri predstavitev trupov prašičev, ki je drugačna od standardne predstavitve, opredeljene v prvem odstavku navedene točke, če se običajna trgovska praksa na njihovem ozemlju razlikuje od navedene standardne predstavitve.
In its request, Cyprus specified that in its territory it is commercial practice that carcasses can be presented with tongue, kidneys and flare fat.
V svoji prošnji je Ciper navedel, da se na njegovem ozemlju v skladu s trgovsko prakso navedeni trupi lahko predstavijo z jezikom, ledvicami in ledvično maščobo.
This presentation that differs from the standard presentation should therefore be authorised in Cyprus.
Zato bi bilo treba Cipru odobriti to predstavitev, ki je drugačna od standardne.
In order to establish quotations for pig carcasses on a comparable basis, this different presentation should be taken into account by adjusting the weight recorded in such cases in relation to the weight for standard presentation.
Za določitev kotacij za prašičje trupe na primerljivi podlagi bi bilo treba upoštevati to drugačno predstavitev, in sicer s prilagoditvijo mase, zabeležene v takih primerih, glede na maso pri standardni predstavitvi.
Decision 2005/7/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2005/7/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Article 2 of Decision 2005/7/EC is replaced by the following:
Člen 2 Odločbe 2005/7/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Notwithstanding the standard presentation laid down in the first paragraph of point B.III of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, pig carcasses in Cyprus may be presented without removing the tongue, kidneys and flare fat before the carcass is weighed and graded.
Ne glede na standardno predstavitev, določeno s prvim odstavkom točke B.III Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007, se lahko prašičji trupi na Cipru predstavijo, ne da bi se jim pred tehtanjem in razvrščanjem odstranilo jezik, ledvice in ledvično maščobo.
hot carcass weight
masa toplega trupa
weight of the hot carcass with tongue, kidney and flare fat
masa toplega trupa z jezikom, ledvicami in ledvično maščobo
Done at Brussels, 11 October 2013.
V Bruslju, 11. oktobra 2013
Commission Decision 2005/7/EC of 27 December 2004 authorising a method for grading pig carcasses in Cyprus (OJ L 2, 5.1.2005, p. 19).
Odločba Komisije 2005/7/ES z dne 27. decembra 2004 o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov na Cipru (UL L 2, 5.1.2005, str. 19).
recognising parts of the Union as free from varroosis in bees and establishing additional guarantees required in intra-Union trade and imports for the protection of their varroosis-free status
o priznanju delov Unije kot prostih varooze čebel in o določitvi dodatnih jamstev, ki so potrebna za trgovanje znotraj Unije in uvoz za zaščito njihovega statusa brez varooze
(notified under document C(2013) 6599)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 6599)
Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC [1], and in particular Article 15(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/65/EGS z dne 13. julija 1992 o zahtevah zdravstvenega varstva živali za trgovino in za uvoz v Skupnost živali, semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov, za katere ne veljajo zahteve zdravstvenega varstva živali, določene v posebnih pravilih Skupnosti iz Priloge A(I) k Direktivi 90/425/EGS [1], in zlasti člena 15(2) Direktive,
Directive 92/65/EEC lays down the animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Union of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to the animal health requirements laid down in the specific acts of the Union referred to in Annex F thereto.
Direktiva 92/65/EGS določa zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali za trgovino in uvoz živali, semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov v Evropsko unijo, za katere ne veljajo zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, določene v posebnih aktih Unije iz Priloge F k Direktivi.
Varroasis in bees is listed in Annex B to Directive 92/65/EEC.
Varooza čebel je navedena na seznamu v Prilogi B k Direktivi 92/65/EGS.
It is caused by ectoparasitic mites of the genus Varroa and has been reported worldwide.
Povzročajo jo ektoparazitske pršice iz rodu Varroa in razširjena je po vsem svetu.
Article 15 of Directive 92/65/EEC provides that, where a Member State considers that its territory or part of its territory is free from one of the diseases listed in in Annex B thereto, it is to submit to the Commission appropriate documentation, on the basis of which a Decision is to be adopted.
Člen 15 Direktive 92/65/EGS določa, da kadar država članica meni, da na njenem ozemlju ali delu njenega ozemlja ni ene od bolezni s seznama v Prilogi B k Direktivi, Komisiji predloži ustrezno dokumentacijo, na podlagi katere se sprejme sklep.
Varroasis spreads through movement of bee brood and direct contact between infested adult bees.
Varooza se širi s premikanjem čebelje zalege in neposrednim stikom z okuženimi odraslimi čebelami.
The latter is only possible within the bee’s fly range.
Stik je mogoč le na območju, na katerem se lahko premika čebela.
Consequently, only territories where the movement of bee hives and brood can be controlled and which are geographically isolated enough to prevent the migration of bees from the outside can be recognised as disease-free.
Zaradi tega se lahko samo ozemlja, kjer je mogoče nadzorovati premikanje panjev in zalege ter ki so geografsko dovolj izolirana za preprečitev seljenja čebel od zunaj, priznajo kot prosta bolezni.
Moreover, the competent authorities must prove through extended surveillance results that the region is indeed free from varroosis and that, to maintain the status, the introduction of live bees and brood is strictly controlled.
Poleg tega morajo pristojni organi s podrobnimi rezultati nadzora dokazati, da je regija resnično prosta varooze in da je za ohranitev statusa vnos živih čebel in zalege strogo nadzorovan.
Finland has asked the Commission to recognise the Åland Islands as a part of its territory that is free from varroosis.
Finska je Komisijo zaprosila za priznanje Ålandskih otokov kot dela njenega ozemlja, prostega varooze.
Article 355(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides that the provisions of the Treaties are to apply to the Åland Islands in accordance with the provisions set out in Protocol 2 to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.
Člen 355(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije določa, da se določbe Pogodb uporabljajo za Ålandske otoke v skladu z določbami iz Protokola št. 2 k Aktu o pogojih pristopa Republike Avstrije, Republike Finske in Kraljevine Švedske.
The Åland Islands are a group of islands situated between the Gulf of Bothnia and the Baltic Sea and they are therefore geographically sufficiently separated from potentially varroosis-infected areas.
Ålandski otoki so skupina otokov med Botnijskim zalivom in Baltskim morjem, zato so geografsko dovolj ločeni od območij, potencialno okuženih z varoozo.
Varroosis is a notifiable disease in the Åland Islands and no capped brood and hatched, adult live honey bees can be moved from mainland Finland to the Åland Islands.
Varoozo je na Ålandskih otokih obvezno treba prijaviti in s Finske je prepovedano vnašati pokrito zalego in izvaljene, odrasle medonosne čebele na Ålandske otoke.
Finland has for several years observed the island’s bee population.
Finska že več let opazuje čebeljo populacijo na otoku.
On the basis of that surveillance Finland can now confirm the absence of the disease on the Åland Islands.
Na podlagi navedenega nadzora Finska lahko zdaj potrdi odsotnost navedene bolezni na Ålandskih otokih.
As a result, that part of the Finnish territory can be considered free from that disease.
Posledično se lahko navedeni del finskega ozemlja šteje za prostega navedene bolezni.
The additional guarantees required in trade should therefore be defined, taking into account the measures already put in place by Finland in its national legislation.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti dodatna jamstva, ki se zahtevajo za trgovanje, ob upoštevanju ukrepov, ki jih je Finska že sprejela v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji.
To establish the preconditions for the model health certificates for intra-Union movements of live bees between territories of the Union free of Varroa, an additional certification should be established in the health certificate set out in Part 2 of Annex E to Directive 92/65/EEC.
Da bi določili predpogoje za vzorce veterinarskih spričeval za premikanje živih čebel znotraj Unije med ozemlji Unije, ki so prosta Varroe, bi bilo treba določiti dodatno certificiranje v okviru veterinarskega spričevala iz dela 2 Priloge E k Direktivi 92/65/EGS.
Moreover, the local veterinary unit of the varroosis-free area or areas should be identified with a TRACES Code in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/821/EC [2].
Poleg tega bi morale biti lokalne veterinarske enote območij, prostih varooze, označene z oznako Traces v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2009/821/ES [2].
The introduction of live bees into the Union is only authorised under the conditions provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 [3].
Vnos živih čebel v Unijo je dovoljen le pod pogoji iz Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 206/2010 [3].
In addition to the requirements laid down in that Regulation, in order to protect the varroosis-free status of the territories recognised as such, it is appropriate to prohibit the introduction of consignments of queen bees and their accompanying attendants into the Union, where the declared final destination of the consignments is a varroosis-free territory.
Da bi zaščitili status ozemelj, ki so priznana kot prosta varooze, je poleg zahtev iz navedene uredbe primerno prepovedati vnos pošiljk čebeljih matic in njihovih spremljevalk v Unijo, kadar je navedeni končni namembni kraj ozemlje, prosto varooze.
The Member States or territories thereof listed in the third column of the table set out in the Annex are recognised as free from varroosis.
Države članice ali njihova ozemlja iz tretjega stolpca preglednice iz Priloge se priznajo kot prosti varooze.
The Member States listed in the Annex shall ensure that in the territories listed in the third column of the table set out in the Annex, the following conditions are complied with:
Države članice iz Priloge zagotovijo, da so na ozemljih, navedenih v tretjem stolpcu preglednice iz Priloge, izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
varroosis is compulsorily notifiable under national law;
varoozo je treba obvezno prijaviti v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo;
regular surveillance is carried out to substantiate the absence of ectoparasitic mites of the genus Varroa.
izvaja se redni nadzor za potrditev odsotnosti ektoparazitskih pršic iz rodu Varroa.
The Member States listed in the Annex shall report the results of the surveillance referred to in paragraph 1(b) to the Commission by 31 May each year.
Države članice iz Priloge Komisiji vsako leto do 31. maja poročajo o rezultatih nadzora iz odstavka 1(b).