natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The synthesis report states that: ‘all the costs and revenues of RTP are based on the premise that its activity only refers to the provision of public television services, and that the present audits were based on financial statements audited by both the company’s internal auditor and external auditors, from which did not result any relevant facts other than the ones described in detail in the annual accounts’ [90].
Zbirno poročilo navaja, da: „vsi stroški in prihodki javne televizije RTP temeljijo na predpostavki, da se njena dejavnost nanaša samo na zagotavljanje storitev javne televizije, in da so te revizije temeljile na finančnih računovodskih izkazih, ki so jih revidirali tako notranji revizor podjetja kot zunanji revizorji, ki niso ugotovili nič takega, kar ne bi bilo podrobno opisano v letnih računovodskih izkazih“ [90].
The Commission had already established (see recital 18 of this Decision) that RTP had only conducted public service activities during the years under investigation, whereas the commercial activities were carried out by legally distinct subsidiaries of RTP.
Komisija je že ugotovila (glej uvodno izjavo 18 tega sklepa), da je javna televizija RTP v letih, ki so bila predmet revizije, opravljala samo dejavnosti javne službe, komercialne dejavnosti pa so izvajale pravno ločene podružnice javne televizije RTP.
Firstly, it must be acknowledged, as admitted also by SIC, that the audit report No 8/2002 covers the period from 1997 to 2000, and is therefore only relevant for the years 1997 and 1998.
Prvič, treba je priznati, kar je priznala tudi komercialna televizija SIC, da poročilo št. 8/2002 zajema obdobje 1997–2000, zato je pomembno samo za leti 1997 in 1998.
While figures in respect of earlier years have been mentioned in that report, they were meant to use to describe the general financial development of RTP, but were not themselves subject of the Court of Auditor’s investigation.
Številke iz prejšnjih let so bile v tem poročilu sicer navedene, vendar so bile uporabljene za opis splošnega finančnega razvoja javne televizije RTP, samih številk pa računsko sodišče v svoji preiskavi ni obravnavalo.
Paragraphs 53 and 54 of the Letter of Portugal of 8 June 2010.
Odstavka 53 in 54 dopisa Portugalske z dne 8. junija 2010.
See also paragraph 108 of the submission 7 September 2009.
Glej tudi odstavek 108 pripomb z dne 7. septembra 2009.
Article 115(5) of the Portuguese Constitution in its form in force at the time of RTP’s transformation provided that no law should: ‘create other forms of legislation or grant other types of act the power to interpret, integrate, modify, suspend or revoke any of its provisions in such a way to produce effects in relation to third parties’. As RTP was nationalised in 1975 by an act of legislation, namely by Decree-Law No D 674-D/75, its transformation into another legal form could again only be achieved by way of a decree-law, or by a law which has an equivalent or even higher rank than that of a decree-law.
Člen 115(5) portugalske ustave, kot je veljala v času preoblikovanja javne televizije RTP, je določal, da: „noben zakon ne more ustanoviti drugih oblik zakonodaje ali dati pristojnosti drugim vrstam aktom, da katero koli njegovo določbo razlagajo, vključijo, spremenijo, začasno prekličejo ali razveljavijo tako, da ima učinek na tretje stranke.“ Ker je bila javna televizija RTP leta 1975 nacionalizirana z zakonodajo, tj. Uredbo z zakonsko močjo št. D 674-D/75, je bilo njeno preoblikovanje v drugo pravno obliko mogoče izvesti samo z uredbo z zakonsko močjo ali z zakonom, ki je uredbi z zakonsko močjo enakovreden oziroma hierarhično nadrejen.
The years 1993 to 1997 were only covered in the report for the purpose of a general description of RTP’s financial situation and restructuring needs, but do not constitute the very subject matter of the report. The report purpose is to assess RTP’s management, the role of the State as a shareholder and the provision of the public broadcasting service.
Obdobje 1993–1997 je bilo zajeto samo v poročilu, ki je bilo namenjeno splošnemu opisu finančnega položaja javne televizije RTP in njenih potreb po financiranju, vendar ta leta niso bila samo bistvo poročila.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 dopušča uporabo tega sklada do letne zgornje meje v višini 1 milijarde EUR.
Italy submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by flooding in Liguria and Tuscany,
Italija je predložila vlogo za uporabo sklada v zvezi s škodo, ki so jo povzročile poplave v Liguriji in Toskani –
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 18061682 in commitment and payment appropriations.
V splošnem proračunu Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012 se uporabijo sredstva Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije v znesku 18061682 EUR za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila.
Whereas: (1) The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the ‘Fund’) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(1) Evropska unija je ustanovila Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije („sklad“), da bi pokazala svojo solidarnost s prebivalstvom območij, ki so jih prizadele nesreče.
Decision of the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta, Komisije, Sodišča Evropske unije, Računskega sodišča, Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij
of 29 June 2012
z dne 29. junija 2012
amending Decision 2009/496/EC, Euratom on the organisation and operation of the Publications Office of the European Union
o spremembi Sklepa 2009/496/ES, Euratom o organizaciji in delovanju Urada za publikacije Evropske unije
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
EVROPSKA KOMISIJA,
THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
SODIŠČE EVROPSKE UNIJE,
THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE,
EVROPSKI EKONOMSKO-SOCIALNI ODBOR,
It is necessary to amend Decision 2009/496/EC, Euratom of the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 June 2009 on the organisation and operation of the Publications Office of the European Union [1] in order to adapt it to the provisions of the Treaties as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon and, in particular, to add the European Council as a signatory institution.
Potrebno je spremeniti Sklep 2009/496/ES, Euratom Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta, Komisije, Sodišča Evropske unije, Računskega sodišča, Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij z dne 26. junija 2009 o organizaciji in delovanju Urada za publikacije Evropske unije [1], da se ga prilagodi določbam Pogodb, kakor so bile spremenjene z Lizbonsko pogodbo, in zlasti zato, da se Evropski svet doda kot institucijo podpisnico.
The Management Committee of the Publications Office has agreed, at its meeting on 2 July 2010, that the European Council become a signatory institution and, on 14 April 2011, that Decision 2009/496/EC, Euratom should therefore be amended,
Upravni odbor Urada za publikacije se je na zasedanju dne 2. julija 2010 strinjal, da Evropski svet postane institucija podpisnica, na zasedanju dne 14. aprila 2011 pa potrdil, da bi bilo Sklep 2009/496/ESC, Euratom zato treba spremeniti –
Decision 2009/496/EC, Euratom is amended as follows:
Sklep 2009/496/ES, Euratom se spremeni:
the title shall be replaced by ‘Decision of the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the organisation and operation of the Publications Office of the European Union’;
Naslov se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom: „Sklep Evropskega parlamenta, Evropskega sveta, Sveta, Komisije, Sodišča Evropske unije, Računskega sodišča, Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij o organizaciji in delovanju Urada za publikacije Evropske unije“.
the list of enacting institutions and bodies shall be replaced by the following:
Seznam institucij in organov, ki sprejmejo navedeni akt, se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
„EVROPSKI PARLAMENT,
THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,
EVROPSKI SVET,
THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS’;
ODBOR REGIJ“.
in Article 1(1) the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 1(1) se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
The task of the Publications Office of the European Union (hereinafter the Office), which is an interinstitutional office, shall be to publish the publications of the institutions of the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community under optimum conditions.’;
Urad za publikacije Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Urad) je medinstitucionalni urad, katerega naloga je, da pod najboljšimi možnimi pogoji zagotavlja izdajo publikacij institucij Evropske unije in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo.“
Article 4(6) shall be replaced by the following:
Odstavek 6 člena 4 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The European External Action Service may also cooperate with the Office and, for this purpose, conclude a service agreement.’;
Z Uradom lahko sodeluje tudi Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje ter za ta namen z njim sklene sporazum o opravljanju storitev.“
Article 6(1) shall be replaced by the following:
Odstavek 1 člena 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
A Management Committee shall be established, within which all the signatory institutions are represented.
Ustanovi se upravni odbor, v katerem so zastopane institucije, ki so podpisnice tega sklepa.
The Management Committee shall be made up of the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Secretaries-General of the other institutions or their representatives.
Upravni odbor sestavljajo sodni tajnik Sodišča Evropske unije ter generalni sekretarji drugih institucij ali njihovi zastopniki.
The European Central Bank shall be represented by the Secretary to its Executive Board or by their appointed substitute.’;
Evropsko centralno banko zastopa sekretar izvršnega odbora ali njegov imenovani namestnik.“
the list of signatories shall be replaced by the following:
Seznam podpisnic se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘For the European Parliament,
„Za Evropski parlament
For the European Council,
Za Evropski svet
For the Court of Justice of the European Union,
Za Sodišče Evropske unije
For the Court of Auditors,
Za Računsko sodišče
For the European Economic and Social Committee,
Za Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor
For the Committee of the Regions’.
Za Odbor regij“.
Done at Brussels and at Luxembourg, 29 June 2012.
V Bruslju in Luxembourgu, 29. junija 2012
OJ L 168, 30.6.2009, p. 41.
UL L 168, 30.6.2009, str. 41.
abrogating Decision 2010/285/EU on the existence of an excessive deficit in Germany
o razveljavitvi Sklepa 2010/285/EU o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v Nemčiji
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 126(12) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 126(12) Pogodbe,
On 2 December 2009, by Decision 2010/285/EU [1], following a proposal from the Commission in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty, the Council decided that an excessive deficit existed in Germany.
Svet je 2. decembra 2009 s Sklepom 2010/285/EU [1] na predlog Komisije v skladu s členom 126(6) Pogodbe sprejel odločitev, da ima Nemčija čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Council noted that the general government deficit planned for 2009 was 3,7 % of GDP, thus above the 3 % of GDP Treaty reference value, while the general government gross debt was planned to reach 74,2 % of GDP in 2009, thus above the 60 % of GDP Treaty reference value [2].
Svet je opozoril, da je predvideni javnofinančni primanjkljaj za leto 2009 znašal 3,7 % BDP, kar je nad referenčno vrednostjo 3 % BDP iz Pogodbe, medtem ko se je predvidevalo, da bo bruto javni dolg v letu 2009 dosegel 74,2 % BDP, kar je nad referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP iz Pogodbe [2].
Article 4 of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaties requires that the Commission provide the data for the implementation of the procedure.
Člen 4 Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga k Pogodbama, zahteva, da Komisija zagotovi podatke za izvedbo postopka.
As part of the application of this Protocol, Member States are to notify data on government deficits and debt and other associated variables twice a year, namely before 1 April and before 1 October, in accordance with Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 of 25 May 2009 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community [4].
V skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 479/2009 z dne 25. maja 2009 o uporabi Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti [4], države članice v okviru uporabe tega protokola dvakrat letno sporočijo podatke o javnofinančnih primanjkljajih in dolgu ter drugih s tem povezanih spremenljivkah, in sicer pred 1. aprilom in 1. oktobrom.
When considering whether a decision on the existence of an excessive deficit should be abrogated, the Council should take a decision on the basis of notified data.
Svet bi se moral o razveljavitvi sklepa o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja odločati na podlagi sporočenih podatkov.
Moreover, a decision on the existence of an excessive deficit should be abrogated only if the Commission forecasts indicate that the deficit will not exceed the 3 % of GDP threshold over the forecast horizon [5].
Poleg tega bi bilo treba sklep o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja razveljaviti le, če napovedi Komisije kažejo, da primanjkljaj v obdobju, ki ga napovedi zajemajo, ne bo presegal 3 % BDP [5].
Based on data provided by the Commission (Eurostat) in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 following the notification by Germany before 1 April 2012 and on the Commission services 2012 spring forecast, the following conclusions are justified:
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je zagotovila Komisija (Eurostat) v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2009 po uradnem obvestilu, ki ga je Nemčija poslala pred 1. aprilom 2012, in na podlagi napovedi služb Komisije iz pomladi 2012 so utemeljene naslednje ugotovitve:
Having stood at 3,2 % of GDP in 2009 and 4,3% of GDP in 2010, the general government deficit in Germany has been brought down to 1 % of GDP in 2011, thus below the 3 % reference value, two years ahead of the deadline set by the Council.
Javnofinančni primanjkljaj v Nemčiji je znašal 3,2 % BDP leta 2009 in 4,3 % BDP leta 2010, leta 2011 pa se je znižal na 1 % BDP, kar je pod referenčno vrednostjo 3 %, in sicer dve leti pred rokom, ki ga je določil Svet.
This improvement was driven by favourable cyclical conditions, the robust labour market, the phasing-out of stimulus measures, fiscal consolidation efforts and the fading-out of the one-off impact of financial sector stabilisation measures on the deficit in the previous year.
K temu izboljšanju so pripomogli ugodni ciklični dejavniki, stabilen trg dela, postopno odpravljanje spodbujevalnih ukrepov, prizadevanja za fiskalno konsolidacijo in postopno prenehanje enkratnega učinka ukrepov za stabilizacijo finančnega sektorja na primanjkljaj v predhodnem letu.
After having dropped to 81,2 % of GDP in 2011, gross debt is to increase again to 82,0 % of GDP in 2012 as a result of the euro area stabilisation measures, according to the Stability Programme, before falling to 80 % of GDP in 2013 and remaining on a downward path thereafter.
Po tem, ko se je bruto dolg leta 2011 znižal na 81,2 % BDP, naj bi se v skladu s programom stabilnosti leta 2012 spet povečal na 82,0 % BDP zaradi ukrepov za stabilizacijo euroobmočja, leta 2013 pa naj bi se ponovno skrčil na 80 % BDP in se nato še naprej zmanjševal.
This is broadly in line with the Commission services’ forecast of a debt-to-GDP ratio of 82,2 % in 2012 and 80,7 % in 2013, which does not consider potential gains from the winding-up of ‘bad banks’.
To se na splošno ujema z napovedjo služb Komisije glede deleža dolga v razmerju do BDP, ki naj bi leta 2012 znašal 82,2 %, leta 2013 pa 80,7 %, pri čemer se ne upoštevajo potencialni dobički likvidacije „slabih bank“.
In accordance with Article 126(12) of the Treaty, a Council decision on the existence of an excessive deficit is to be abrogated when the excessive deficit in the Member State concerned has, in the view of the Council, been corrected.
V skladu s členom 126(12) Pogodbe se sklep Sveta o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja razveljavi, če se čezmerni primanjkljaj v zadevni državi članici po njegovem mnenju odpravi.
The Council recalls that, starting in the year following the correction of its excessive deficit, Germany is in a transition period of three years (2012-2014), in which the requirement under the debt criterion is to be considered fulfilled if the country makes sufficient progress towards compliance with the debt reduction benchmark, in accordance with Article 2(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97.
Svet poudarja, da Nemčija z letom, ki sledi letu, ko je odpravila svoj čezmerni primanjkljaj, začenja prehodno obdobje treh let (2012–2014), v katerem se zahteva v skladu s členom 2(1a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 glede dolga šteje za izpolnjeno, če država dovolj napreduje pri doseganju skladnosti z merilom glede zmanjšanja dolga.
The fiscal adjustment planned by Germany in its stability programme is consistent with sufficient progress towards compliance with the debt reduction benchmark at the end of the transition.
Fiskalna prilagoditev, ki jo Nemčija načrtuje v svojem programu stabilnosti, je skladna z zadostnim napredkom pri doseganju skladnosti z merilom glede zmanjšanja dolga na koncu prehoda.
In the view of the Council, the excessive deficit in Germany has been corrected and Decision 2010/285/EU should therefore be abrogated,
Po mnenju Sveta je bil čezmerni primanjkljaj v Nemčiji odpravljen, zato bi bilo treba Sklep 2010/285/EU razveljaviti –
Decision 2010/285/EU is hereby abrogated.
Sklep 2010/285/EU se razveljavi.
OJ L 125, 21.5.2010, p. 38.
UL L 125, 21.5.2010, str. 38.
The general government deficit and debt for 2009 were subsequently revised to currently 3,2 % of GDP and 74,4 % of GDP respectively.
Javnofinančni primanjkljaj in dolg za leto 2009 sta bila pozneje popravljena na 3,2 % BDP oziroma 74,4 % BDP.
On 2 December 2009, in accordance with Article 126(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure [3], the Council, based on a recommendation from the Commission, addressed a recommendation to Germany with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end by 2013 at the latest.
Svet je 2. decembra 2009 v skladu s členom 126(7) Pogodbe in členom 3(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [3] na podlagi priporočila Komisije na Nemčijo naslovil priporočilo z namenom, da odpravi čezmerni primanjkljaj najpozneje do konca leta 2013.
The German 2012 Stability Programme plans for the deficit to remain at 1 % of GDP in 2012 and to drop to ½ % of GDP in 2013, which is broadly in line with the Commission services forecast of a deficit of 0,9 % of GDP in 2012 and 0,7 % of GDP in 2013.
Nemški program stabilnosti iz leta 2012 predvideva, da bo primanjkljaj leta 2012 ostal na ravni 1 % BDP, v letu 2013 pa naj bi se znižal na 0,5 % BDP, kar je dokaj skladno z napovedjo služb Komisije, da bo primanjkljaj leta 2012 znašal 0,9 % BDP, leta 2013 pa 0,7 % BDP.
Thus, the deficit is set to remain well below the reference value of 3 % of GDP.
Tako naj bi primanjkljaj ostal precej pod referenčno vrednostjo 3 % BDP.
In addition, according to the Commission services’ forecast, the cyclically adjusted budget deficit, net of one-off and other temporary measures, will be 0,4 % of GDP in 2012 and 0,3 % of GDP in 2013.
Poleg tega naj bi v skladu z napovedjo služb Komisije ciklično prilagojeni proračunski primanjkljaj brez enkratnih in drugih začasnih ukrepov leta 2012 znašal 0,4 % BDP, leta 2013 pa 0,3 % BDP.
Meanwhile, the growth rate of government expenditure net of discretionary revenue measures is forecast to exceed the expenditure benchmark as specified in Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies [6] in 2012, while respecting it in 2013.The debt-to-GDP ratio surged by 8,6 percentage points to 83,0 % in 2010, notably due to the transfer of impaired assets to ‘bad banks’ in the context of financial sector stabilisation.
Stopnja rasti javnofinančnih odhodkov brez diskrecijskih prihodkovnih ukrepov naj bi leta 2012 presegla merilo za odhodke iz člena 5(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1466/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o okrepitvi nadzora nad proračunskim stanjem ter o nadzoru in usklajevanju gospodarskih politik [6], leta 2013 pa naj bi bila z njim skladna.Delež dolga v razmerju do BDP se je leta 2010 povečal za 8,6 odstotne točke na 83,0 %, zlasti zaradi prenosa oslabljenih sredstev na „slabe banke“ v okviru stabilizacije finančnega sektorja.
In line with the ‘Specifications on the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact and Guidelines on the format and content of Stability and Convergence Programmes’, as agreed by the Council on 24 January 2012.
V skladu z dokumentom „Posebnosti izvajanja Pakta stabilnosti in rasti ter smernice za obliko in vsebino programov stabilnosti in konvergence“, ki jih je 24. januarja 2012 potrdil Svet Ecofin.
See: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/pdf/coc/code_of_conduct_en.pdf
Glej: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/pdf/coc/code_of_conduct_en.pdf.
abrogating Decision 2010/422/EU on the existence of an excessive deficit in Bulgaria
o razveljavitvi Sklepa 2010/422/EU o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja v Bolgariji
On 13 July 2010, by Decision 2010/422/EU [1], following a proposal from the Commission in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty, the Council decided that an excessive deficit existed in Bulgaria.
Svet je 13. julija 2010 s Sklepom 2010/422/EU [1] na predlog Komisije v skladu s členom 126(6) Pogodbe sprejel odločitev, da v Bolgariji obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Council noted that the general government deficit reached 3,9 % of GDP in 2009, above the 3 % of GDP Treaty reference value, while the general government gross debt was 14,8 % of GDP, well below the 60 % of GDP Treaty reference value [2].
Svet je opozoril, da je leta 2009 javnofinančni primanjkljaj dosegel 3,9 % BDP, kar je nad referenčno vrednostjo 3 % BDP iz Pogodbe, medtem ko je bruto javnofinančni dolg znašal 14,8 % BDP, kar je precej pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP iz Pogodbe [2].
In accordance with Article 4 of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaties, the Commission provides the data for the implementation of the procedure.
V skladu s členom 4 Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga k Pogodbama, Komisija zagotovi podatke za izvajanje postopka.