natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such suspension of commitments should be effective from 1 January of the year following the decision to suspend.
Takšna začasna ustavitev obveznosti bi morala učinkovati od 1. januarja leta, ki sledi odločitvi o začasni ustavitvi.
On 5 July 2004, by Decision 2004/918/EC [6] the Council decided in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) that an excessive deficit existed in Hungary.
Svet je 5. julija 2004 z Odločbo 2004/918/ES [6] v skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (PES) odločil, da na Madžarskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The Council adopted a first recommendation on 5 July 2004, a second recommendation on 8 March 2005 and a third recommendation on 10 October 2006 addressed to Hungary in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC.
Svet je v skladu s členom 104(7) PES sprejel prvo priporočilo 5. julija 2004, drugo priporočilo 8. marca 2005 ter tretje priporočilo 10. oktobra 2006, vsa naslovljena na Madžarsko.
The budget surplus in 2011 hinged upon substantial one-off revenues of over 10 % of GDP and was accompanied by a cumulative structural deterioration in 2010 and 2011 of 2,75 % of GDP compared to a recommended cumulative fiscal improvement of 0,5 % of GDP.
Proračunski presežek v letu 2011 je bil odvisen od znatnih enkratnih prihodkov v višini več kot 10 % BDP in ga je v letih 2010 in 2011 spremljalo skupno strukturno poslabšanje v višini 2,75 % BDP v primerjavi s priporočenim skupnim izboljšanjem proračuna v višini 0,5 % BDP.
Moreover, while the authorities intend to implement substantial structural measures in 2012 reducing the structural deficit to 2,6 % of GDP, the 3 % of GDP reference value would again be respected only thanks to one-off measures of close to 1 % of GDP.
Poleg tega organi v letu 2012 nameravajo izvajati znatne strukturne ukrepe za zmanjšanje strukturnega primanjkljaja na 2,6 % BDP, vendar bi bila referenčna vrednost 3 % BDP znova dosežena le zaradi enkratnih ukrepov v vrednosti skoraj 1 % BDP.
Overall, the Council concluded that the response by the Hungarian authorities to the Council Recommendation of 7 July 2009 pursuant to Article 126(7) TFEU had been insufficient.
Na splošno je Svet sklenil, da je bil odziv madžarskih organov na Priporočilo Sveta, sprejeto 7. julija 2009 v skladu s členom 126(7) PDEU, pomanjkljiv.
Therefore, in the case of Hungary, the two conditions set out in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006 have been fulfilled.
Zato sta bila v primeru Madžarske pogoja iz člena 4(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1084/2006 izpolnjena.
Accordingly, it is appropriate, in case of a first application of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006 to a given Member State, to set the amount at 50 % of the allocation of cohesion funds for 2013, without exceeding a maximum level of 0,5 % of the nominal GDP of the Member State concerned as forecast by the Commission services.
V skladu s tem je primerno prve uporabe člena 4(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1084/2006 za zadevno državo v primeru določiti znesek na 50 % dodelitve kohezijskih sredstev za leto 2013, ne da bi se presegla najvišja raven 0,5 % nominalnega BDP zadevne države članice, najavljena v napovedi služb Komisije.
Since the suspension concerns only commitments, the implementation of transport and environment projects or commitments already made at the time of suspension will not be compromised if the necessary corrective actions are promptly implemented.
Ker začasna ustavitev zadeva samo obveznosti, izvajanje projektov na področju prometa in okolja ali obveznosti, ki v času začasne ustavitve že obstajajo, ne bo prizadeto, če se potrebni popravni ukrepi izvedejo hitro.
By suspending commitments taking effect as of the following year, the ongoing project implementation will not be affected for an extended period, giving the authorities the necessary time to adopt measures that would restore macroeconomic and fiscal conditions conductive to sustainable growth and employment.
Začasna ustavitev obveznosti, ki začne učinkovati naslednje leto, ne vpliva na izvajanje tekočih projektov za podaljšano obdobje, s čimer imajo organi potreben čas za sprejetje ukrepov, ki naj bi ponovno vzpostavili makroekonomske in fiskalne pogoje, ugodne za trajnostno rast in zaposlovanje.
In accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006, if by 22 June 2012, or at a later date, the Council establishes that Hungary has taken the necessary corrective action, it will decide, without delay, to lift the suspension of the commitments concerned,
Če Svet v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1084/2006 do 22. junija 2012 ali kasneje ugotovi, da je Madžarska uvedla potrebne popravljalne ukrepe, bo nemudoma odločil, da se začasna ustavitev zadevnih obveznosti prekine –
The amount of EUR 495184000 (in current prices) of commitments from the Cohesion Fund for Hungary shall be suspended with effect from 1 January 2013.
Znesek v višini 495184000 EUR (v tekočih cenah) kot obveznost Kohezijskega sklada do Madžarske se začasno ustavi z učinkom od 1. januarja 2013.
Replacing Article 104 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006.
Nadomešča člen 104 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (PES) v členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1084/2006.
Replacing Article 104(6) TEC as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006.
Nadomešča člen 104 (6) PES v členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1084/2006.
Replacing Article 104(8) TEC as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006.
Nadomešča člen 104(8) PES v členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1084/2006.
Replacing Article 104(7) TEC as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006.
Nadomešča člen 104(7) PES v členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1084/2006.
OJ L 66, 6.3.2012, p. 6.
UL L 66, 6.3.2012, str. 6.
On 7 July 2009 the Council adopted its fourth recommendation to Hungary in accordance with Article 104(7) TEC (‘Council Recommendation of 7 July 2009’) with a view to bringing an end to the situation of an excessive government deficit by 2011 at the latest.
Svet je 7. julija 2009 sprejel četrto priporočilo za Madžarsko v skladu s členom 104(7) PES („Priporočilo Sveta z dne 7. julija 2009“) za odpravo čezmernega javnofinančnega primanjkljaja najpozneje do leta 2011.
Specifically, Hungary was recommended: (i) to limit the deterioration of the fiscal position in 2009 by ensuring a rigorous implementation of the adopted and announced corrective measures to respect the target of 3,9 % of GDP; (ii) starting from 2010, to implement rigorously the necessary consolidation measures to ensure a continued reduction of the structural deficit and a renewed decline of the headline deficit, with an increased reliance on structural measures, in order to guarantee a lasting improvement of public finances; (iii) to spell out and adopt in a timely manner the consolidation measures necessary to achieve the correction of the excessive deficit by 2011; (iv) to ensure a cumulative 0,5 % of GDP fiscal effort over 2010 and 2011; and (v) to ensure that the government gross debt ratio was brought onto a firm downward trajectory.
Madžarski je zlasti priporočil naj (i) omeji slabšanje proračunskega položaja v letu 2009 z zagotovitvijo doslednega izvajanja sprejetih in napovedanih popravnih ukrepov, da bi upoštevala cilj 3,9 % BDP; (ii) od leta 2010 natančno izvaja potrebne konsolidacijske ukrepe za zagotovitev stalnega zmanjšanja strukturnega primanjkljaja in novega zmanjšanja nominalnega primanjkljaja, in sicer z večjim opiranjem na strukturne ukrepe s ciljem zagotavljanja trajnega izboljšanja javnih financ; (iii) pravočasno oblikuje in sprejme konsolidacijske ukrepe, da bi se dosegla odprava čezmernega primanjkljaja v letu 2011; (iv) zagotovi skupno proračunsko konsolidacijo najmanj 0,5 % BDP v letih 2010 in 2011; (v) zagotovi stalno zniževanje deleža bruto dolga.
On 24 January 2012 the Council adopted Decision 2012/139/EU [7] in accordance with Article 126(8) TFEU establishing that Hungary had not taken effective action in response to the Council Recommendation of 7 July 2009.
Svet je v skladu s členom 126(8) PDEU 24. januarja 2012 sprejel Sklep 2012/139/EU [7], ki ugotavlja, da se Madžarska ni odzvala z učinkovitimi ukrepi na Priporočilo Sveta z dne 7. julija 2009.
The Decision noted that while Hungary formally respected the 3 % of GDP reference value by 2011, this was not based on a structural and sustainable correction.
V sklepu je bilo navedeno, da je Madžarska sicer formalno spoštovala referenčno vrednost 3 % BDP v letu 2011, vendar to ni temeljilo na strukturnem in trajnostnem popravku.
Finally, in 2013, the deficit (at 3,25 % of GDP) was expected to exceed the reference value in the TFEU once more even after taking into account additional measures announced since the Commission services’ 2011 autumn forecast.
Nazadnje, v letu 2013 naj bi primanjkljaj (v višini 3,25 % BDP) ponovno presegel referenčno vrednost iz PDEU, celo po upoštevanju dodatnih ukrepov, najavljenih v napovedih služb Komisije iz jeseni 2011.
The higher deficit in 2013 would mainly be linked to the fact that temporary one-off revenues were being phased out as planned, while not all planned structural reforms had been sufficiently specified.
Na višji primanjkljaj v letu 2013 pa bi vplivalo zlasti dejstvo, da se začasni enkratni prihodki kot načrtovano postopoma ukinjajo, medtem ko vse načrtovane strukturne reforme niso ustrezno določene.
The Council, on a proposal of the Commission, may thus suspend either the totality or part of the commitments from the Cohesion Fund with effect from 1 January 2013.
Svet lahko tako na predlog Komisije v celoti ali deloma začasno ustavi obveznosti Kohezijskega sklada z učinkom od 1. januarja 2013.
The decision on the amount of commitments to be suspended should ensure that the suspension is both effective and proportionate, whilst taking into account the current overall economic situation in the European Union and the relative importance of the Cohesion Fund for the economy of the Member State concerned.
Odločitev o znesku začasno ustavljenih obveznosti Kohezijskega sklada bi morala zagotoviti, da je začasna ustavitev učinkovita in sorazmerna, ob upoštevanju sedanjih splošnih gospodarskih razmer v Evropski uniji in sorazmernega pomena Kohezijskega sklada za gospodarstvo zadevne države članice.
concerning compensation payments made by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) in 2008 and 2009
o pomočeh v obliki nadomestil, ki jih je grška kmetijska zavarovalna organizacija (ELGA) izplačala v letih 2008 in 2009
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) Pogodbe,
Having invited interested parties to submit their comments, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) of the Treaty [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 108(2) Pogodbe, [1]
Following press reports which came to the Commission’s attention that the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (‘ELGA’) intended to make compensation payments of EUR 425 million after protests by a large number of Greek farmers in January 2009 about their revenue losses in 2008 due to damage caused by adverse weather conditions, a bilateral meeting with the Greek authorities was held on 4 February 2009.
Potem ko je Komisija iz tiska izvedela za nadomestila v višini 425 milijonov EUR, ki naj bi jih grška kmetijska zavarovalna organizacija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ELGA) izplačala na podlagi protestov velikega števila proizvajalcev kmetijskih proizvodov januarja 2009 v Grčiji zaradi izgube prihodka, ki jih je v letu 2008 doletela zaradi slabih vremenskih razmer, je 4. februarja 2009 potekal dvostranski sestanek z grškimi organi.
Subsequently, the Permanent Representation of Greece to the European Union, by letter of 9 February 2009, supplied information regarding this measure.
Stalno predstavništvo Grčije pri Evropski uniji je po tem sestanku posredovalo informacije o tem ukrepu z dopisom z dne 9. februarja 2009.
The Commission asked for additional information by letter of 23 February 2009.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 23. februarja 2009 zaprosila za dodatne informacije.
By letter of 20 March 2009, the Greek authorities replied to the Commission that ELGA had taken out a loan for the compensation payments of EUR 425 million in question, as well as another loan of EUR 444 million, mainly to make payments to compensate producers for damage, in 2008, to crop and animal production due to causes covered by ELGA.
Grški organi so z dopisom z dne 20. marca 2009 Komisiji odgovorili, da je ELGA za izplačila zadevnih nadomestil najela posojilo v višini 425 milijonov EUR in še eno posojilo v višini 444 milijonov EUR, ki je bilo v glavnem namenjeno izplačilu odškodnin v letu 2008 za škodo na rastlinskih pridelkih in staležu živine, ki je nastala prav tako zaradi vzrokov, ki jih krije ELGA.
At the request of the Greek authorities, a bilateral meeting with the Commission took place on 31 March 2011.
Na zahtevo grških organov je 31. marca 2011 potekal dvostranski sestanek s službami Komisije.
Greek Law No 1790/1988 on the organisation and operation of the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation [5] (‘Law No 1790/1988’) created a public service body known as the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA), a private legal person wholly owned by the State.
Z zakonom št. 1790/1988 o organizaciji in delovanju grške kmetijske zavarovalne organizacije ter drugih določbah [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon št. 1790/1988) je bila ustanovljena organizacija, ki deluje v javno korist, imenovana „grška kmetijska zavarovalna organizacija (ELGA)“. ELGA je pravna oseba zasebnega prava, ki je v celotni lasti države.
According to Article 12 of the above Law, ELGA is subject to supervision by the Minister of Agriculture.
V skladu s členom 12 zgoraj navedenega zakona deluje pod nadzorom ministrstva za kmetijstvo.
ELGA administers its budget items in line with the decisions of its Administrative Board, the members of which are appointed by decision of the Minister of Agriculture.
ELGA upravlja postavke, ki se v njen proračun vključijo skladno s sklepi upravnega odbora, katerega člani so imenovani s sklepom ministra za kmetijstvo.
ELGA’s main task is that of insuring crop and animal production and assets of agricultural holdings against damage due to natural risks.
ELGA je med drugim namenjena zavarovanju rastlinskih pridelkov in živine ter rastlinskih in živalskih osnovnih sredstev kmetijskih gospodarstev za škodo, ki jo povzročajo naravne nesreče.
Pursuant to Article 3(a) [6] of Law No 1790/1988, insurance with ELGA is compulsory and covers natural risks, in particular floods, storms, ice and excessive frost, snow, hail, high temperatures and sunlight, excessive or unseasonal rainfall, drought, plant entomological and phytopathological diseases, epizootic diseases, fire caused by lightning, earthquakes, risks caused by the sea, damage to crops by wild animals and a series of cattle, sheep and goat diseases.
Zavarovanje pri organizaciji ELGA je v skladu s členom 3a [6] zakona št. 1790/1988 obvezno, krije pa naravne nesreče, natančneje poplave, neurja, zmrzal in hud mraz, sneg, točo, visoke temperature in sončno pripeko, obilne padavine ali padavine, ki niso običajne za letni čas, sušo, entomološke in fitopatološke bolezni poljščin, epizootske bolezni, strelo kot vzrok požara, potres, tveganja, ki jih povzroča morje, škodo na poljščinah, ki jo povzročajo prostoživeče živali, ter več bolezni goveda, ovac in koz.
According to Article 5(a) [7] of Law No 1790/1988, farmers who are members of the insurance scheme described in recital 9 must pay a special insurance contribution to ELGA.
Plačevanje posebnega prispevka za zavarovanje v korist organizacije ELGA je na podlagi člena 5a [7] zakona št. 1790/1988 obvezno za proizvajalce kmetijskih proizvodov, ki so upravičenci zavarovanja, opisanega v uvodni izjavi 9.
This contribution is in essence a charge levied by the legislator on the buying and selling of Greek agricultural products, the revenue from which goes to fund ELGA, a body tasked with preventing damage and providing compensation for damage to farms caused by natural risks.
Ta prispevek ima naravo dajatve, ki jo je zakonodajalec naložil na prodajo in nakupe domačih kmetijskih proizvodov, prihodki od te dajatve pa so namenjeni organizaciji ELGA, ki se ukvarja s preprečevanjem in nadomeščanjem škode, ki jo kmetijska gospodarstva utrpijo zaradi naravnih nesreč.
Under Article 5(a) of Law No 1790/1988, the special insurance contribution is set at 3 % for products of plant origin and at 0.5 % for animal products [8].
V skladu s členom 5a zakona št. 1790/1988 posebni prispevek za zavarovanje znaša 3 % za rastlinske proizvode in 0,5 % za živalske proizvode.
These contribution rates are set by the competent ministers on the basis of a proposal by ELGA to the Minister of Agriculture.
Obe stopnji prispevka določijo pristojni ministri, in sicer na podlagi predloga, ki ga ELGA predloži ministru za kmetijstvo.
ELGA’s income from the special insurance contribution, collected by the tax authorities, is included in the State budget as State revenue and is entered under a special heading.
Prihodki organizacije ELGA, ki izhajajo iz posebnega prispevka za zavarovanje in jih pobira davčna uprava, se v državni proračun vknjižijo kot prihodki države ter se vpišejo pod posebno postavko na strani prihodkov.
This revenue is paid to ELGA from the budget of the Ministry of Agriculture, now renamed the Ministry of Rural Development and Food, by a transfer of funds in the same amount each year, following a proposal to that Ministry by ELGA.
Ti prihodki se organizaciji ELGA nakažejo v proračun ministrstva za kmetijstvo, ki se je preimenovalo v kmetijstvo za razvoj podeželja in prehrano, tako da se na predlog organizacije ELGA temu ministrstvu v enakem znesku vsako leto knjižijo v dobro.
ELGA has no other influence on the level of either the contribution or the compensation.
To je edini vpliv, ki ga ima ELGA na znesek prispevka ali odškodnin.
Natural and legal persons who own or operate agricultural, stock-breeding, poultry, fishing, aquaculture or other related undertakings are subject to insurance by ELGA.
Pri organizaciji ELGA so zavarovane fizične in pravne osebe, ki imajo v lasti ali upravljajo kmetijske, živinorejske, perutninarske, čebelarske, ribolovne in ribogojske obrate ali podobna gospodarstva.
ELGA’s income mainly comes from the special insurance contribution.
Prihodke organizacije ELGA sestavljajo zlasti prihodki iz posebnega prispevka za zavarovanje.
In addition, ELGA is, according to Law No 3147/2003, able to make aid payments as part of planning programmes in case of extreme need to compensate for damage to crop and fixed assets due to natural disasters, extraordinary events or adverse climatic conditions.
Poleg tega je ELGA v skladu z zakonom št. 3147/2003 pristojna tudi za izplačilo pomoči v okviru programov načrtovanja v primerih skrajne sile v zvezi s povračilom škode na rastlinskih osnovnih sredstvih in stalnih sredstvih zaradi naravnih nesreč, izjemnih dogodkov ali slabih vremenskih razmer.
This aid is financed by the State budget or by loans.
Te pomoči se financirajo iz državnega proračuna ali s posojili.
These programmes concern State aid approved by Commission decisions.
Ti programi se nanašajo na državne pomoči, ki se odobrijo s sklepi Komisije.
This damage concerns almond, cherry, apricot, some peach, plum, pear and apple trees, as well as asparagus, oriental tobacco, potatoes, cotton, olive groves and cereals.
Škoda je prizadela nasade mandljevcev, češenj, marelic, nekaterih vrst breskev, sliv, hrušk in jablan, belušev, orientalskega tobaka, krompirja, bombaža, oljk in žit.
According to information supplied by the Greek authorities, apart from loss of production, deterioration in the quality of some crops (cereals, cotton) had also been taken into account when determining the level of damage.
Glede na informacije, ki so jih predložili grški organi, se je pri določitvi praga škode poleg izgube proizvodnje pri nekaterih pridelkih (žita, bombaž) upoštevalo tudi poslabšanje kakovosti pridelkov.
This loss or deterioration in quality resulted from a combination of meteorological phenomena and crop diseases due to the bad climatic conditions affecting these crops during the year in question.
Zadevna izguba ali pridelek slabše kakovosti sta bila posledici skupka vremenskih pojavov in rastlinskih bolezni, ki so zadevne nasade zaradi slabih vremenskih razmer prizadele v zadevnem letu.
To pay the compensation in question, ELGA took out a bank loan of EUR 425 million to be paid back over 10 years (2010-2019).
ELGA je za izplačilo zadevnih odškodnin najela bančno posojilo v višini 425000000 EUR. Posojilo bo poplačano v desetih letih (od leta 2010 do leta 2019).
According to the information provided by the Greek authorities, the payments made by ELGA in 2008 for damage covered by its insurance amounted to EUR 386986648. This amount came partly from insurance contributions of EUR 88353000 and partly from revenue obtained on the basis of a loan of EUR 444 million.
Glede na informacije, ki so jih predložili grški organi, so odškodnine, ki jih je ELGA v letu 2008 izplačala za zavarovano škodo, znašale 386986648 EUR. Ta znesek je deloma izhajal iz prispevkov za zavarovanje, in sicer v višini 88353000 EUR, deloma pa iz prihodkov na podlagi posojila v višini 444 milijonov EUR.
ELGA took out a bank loan of EUR 444 million on the basis of Article 13 of Law No 3074/2002 and Article 28(17) of Law No 3147/2003.
ELGA je bančno posojilo v višini 444000000 EUR najela na podlagi člena 13 grškega zakona št. 3074/2002 in člena 28(17) grškega zakona št. 3147/2003.
The loan is to be paid back over 10 years (2009-2018).
Posojilo bo poplačano v desetih letih (od leta 2009 do leta 2018).
DOUBTS RAISED BY THE COMMISSION IN INITIATING THE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE
DVOMI KOMISIJE OB SPROŽITVI POSTOPKA PREISKAVE
The existence of aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU
1 Obstoj pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU
Measures granted through State resources: The Commission took the view that this condition was met in this case, given that the relevant national legislation (see recital 11) clearly states that the services provided by ELGA are financed by State resources and that the former are attributable to the State.
Ukrepi, izvedeni z državnimi sredstvi: Komisija je menila, da je ta pogoj v obravnavanem primeru izpolnjen, saj zadevna nacionalna zakonodaja (glej uvodno izjavo 11) jasno določa, da se ukrepi, ki jih zagotavlja ELGA, financirajo iz državnih sredstev in da jih je mogoče pripisati državi.
In the information provided prior to the initiation of the procedure the Greek authorities had indicated that they intended to raise the percentage of the special insurance contribution in order to increase ELGA’s income.
Grški organi so v okviru dodatnih informacij, predloženih pred sprožitvijo postopka, navedli, da načrtujejo zvišanje odstotka posebnega prispevka za zavarovanje, da bi se povečali prihodki organizacije ELGA.
However, the information provided on the increase in ELGA’s income did not contain precise figures at this stage of the procedure to allow the conclusion that this increase would be sufficient to repay the loans in question and the granting of compensation to producers during the relevant years.
Iz informacij, ki so bile predložene v zvezi s povečanjem prihodkov organizacije ELGA, na tej stopnji ni bilo jasno razvidno, ali bi tako povečanje zadoščalo za poplačilo zadevnih posojil in izplačilo odškodnin proizvajalcem v zadevnih letih.
Therefore it was not possible to rule out that these measures would also be financed through other State resources available to ELGA.
Posledično ni bilo mogoče izključiti, da se zadevni ukrepi ne bi financirali tudi z drugimi državnimi sredstvi, ki jih ima na voljo ELGA.