natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Sirene Bureaux may transmit further information on alerts entered under Article 38 of the SIS II Decision and in so doing may act on behalf of judicial authorities, if this information falls within the scope of mutual judicial assistance in accordance with national law.
Uradi SIRENE lahko predložijo dodatne podatke o razpisih ukrepov, vnesenih v skladu s členom 38 Sklepa o SIS II, s tem pa lahko delujejo v imenu pravosodnih organov, če ti podatki v skladu z nacionalnim pravom spadajo na področje uporabe medsebojne pravne pomoči.
The Sirene Bureaux shall send supplementary information as quickly as possible via a P form, if requested in field 089 of a G form, when a hit is achieved on an alert for seizure or use as evidence issued on a vehicle, aircraft, boat, industrial equipment or container pursuant to Article 38 of the SIS II Decision.
Ko uradi SIRENE najdejo zadetek za razpis ukrepa zaradi zasega ali za zagotovitev dokazov, izdanega za vozilo, zrakoplov, plovilo, industrijsko opremo ali zabojnik v skladu s členom 38 Sklepa o SIS II, čim prej pošljejo dopolnilne podatke z obrazcem P v polju 089 obrazca G, če se to zahteva.
Given that the request is urgent and that it will not therefore be possible to collate all the information immediately, it shall not be necessary to fill all the fields of the P form. However, efforts shall be made to collate the information relating to the main headings:
Ker je zahteva nujna in ker zato ne bo mogoče takoj primerjati vseh podatkov, ni treba izpolniti vseh polj v obrazcu P. Vendar si je treba prizadevati, da se primerjajo podatki v glavnih poljih:
These systems are relevant for alerts under Articles 36 and 38 of the SIS II Decision.
Ti sistemi so pomembni za razpise ukrepov iz členov 36 in 38 Sklepa o SIS II.
Due to the widespread use of ANPR for law enforcement purposes there is the technical capability to achieve numerous hits on a vehicle or number plate over a short period of time.
Zaradi razširjene uporabe avtomatskega prepoznavanja registrskih tablic za kazenski pregon obstaja tehnična zmogljivost, da se v kratkem času najdejo številni zadetki za vozilo ali registrsko tablico.
Given that some ANPR sites are manned there is the possibility of a vehicle being detected and the requested action undertaken.
Ker za nekatera spletišča za avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic skrbijo upravitelji, obstaja možnost, da vozilo odkrijejo in izvedejo zahtevani ukrep.
In this case, before any action is undertaken, the users of the ANPR system shall verify whether the hit achieved through ANPR relates to an alert under Article 36 or 38 of the SIS II Decision.
V tem primeru morajo uporabniki sistema za avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic pred kakršnim koli ukrepanjem preveriti, ali se zadetek, najden prek tega sistema, nanaša na razpis ukrepa iz člena 36 ali 38 Sklepa o SIS II.
However, many fixed ANPR sites are not constantly manned.
Vendar za številna spletišča za avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic upravitelji ne skrbijo redno.
Accordingly, although the technology will register the passage of the vehicle and a hit will be achieved, the requested action may not be undertaken.
Čeprav bo tehnologija zabeležila prehod vozila in se bo našel zadetek, se zahtevani ukrep zato ne bo mogel izvesti.
For both Article 36 and Article 38 alerts where the requested action could not be taken the following general procedure shall apply:
Kadar se za razpise ukrepov iz člena 36 in 38 zahtevani ukrep ne more izvesti, se uporablja naslednji splošni postopek:
For alerts under Article 36 the following procedure shall apply:
Za razpise ukrepov iz člena 36 se uporablja naslednji postopek:
the Sirene Bureau of the Member State achieving the hit shall inform the issuing Sirene Bureau of the circumstances of the hit using one G form, using the word ‘ANPR’ in field 086;
Urad SIRENE države članice, ki je našel zadetek, obvesti urad SIRENE države članice izdajateljice o primerih zadetka z obrazcem G in navedbo kratice „ANPR“ (avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic) v polju 086.
the Sirene Bureau of the Member State achieving a hit on an alert for a specific check whereby the requested action could not be taken, shall inform the issuing Sirene bureau of the circumstances of the hit using an H form, with the word ‘ANPR’ in field 083, followed by words to the effect of:
Urad SIRENE države članice, ki je našel zadetek za razpis ukrepa zaradi namenske kontrole, pri čemer se zahtevani ukrep ni mogel izvesti, obvesti urad SIRENE države članice izdajateljice o primerih zadetka z obrazcem H in navedbo kratice „ANPR“ v polju 083, čemur sledi besedilo:
‘This hit has been achieved by use of ANPR. Please inform us if your country wishes to be informed of further hits achieved through ANPR for this vehicle or number plate where the requested action could not be undertaken.’;
„This hit has been achieved by use of ANPR. (Ta zadetek je bil najden z uporabo sistema za avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic.) Please inform us if your country wishes to be informed of further hits achieved through ANPR for this vehicle or number plate where the requested action could not be undertaken. (Obvestite nas, prosim, če želi biti vaša država obveščena o nadaljnjih zadetkih prek sistema za avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic za to vozilo ali registrsko tablico, kadar se zahtevani ukrep ni mogel izvesti.)“
the issuing Member State shall decide whether the alert has achieved its purpose, shall be deleted or not and whether bilateral discussions should take place on information needs.
Država članica izdajateljica odloči, ali je razpis ukrepa dosegel svoj namen, ali naj se izbriše ali ne in ali naj se opravijo dvostranske razprave o potrebah po podatkih.
For alerts under Article 38 the following procedure shall apply:
Za razpise ukrepov iz člena 38 se uporablja naslednji postopek:
in circumstances where a hit occurs and the requested action has been taken the Sirene Bureau of the Member State achieving the hit shall inform the issuing Sirene Bureau of the circumstances of the hit using one G form;
V primerih, ko se najde zadetek in se zahtevani ukrep izvede, urad SIRENE države članice, ki je našla zadetek, obvesti urad SIRENE države članice izdajateljice o primerih zadetka z obrazcem G.
in circumstances where a hit occurs and the requested action has not been taken the Sirene Bureau of the Member State achieving the hit shall inform the Sirene Bureau of the issuing Member State of the circumstances of the hit using an H form and the word ‘ANPR’ in field 083 followed by words to the effect of:
V primerih, ko se najde zadetek in se zahtevani ukrep ne izvede, urad SIRENE države članice, ki je našla zadetek za razpis ukrepa, obvesti urad SIRENE države članice izdajateljice o primerih zadetka z obrazcem H in navedbo besede „ANPR“ v polju 083, čemur sledi besedilo:
‘This hit has been achieved by the use of ANPR. Please inform us if your country wishes to be informed of further hits achieved through ANPR for this vehicle or number plate where the requested action could not be taken.’;
„This hit has been achieved by use of ANPR. (Ta zadetek je bil najden z uporabo sistema za avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic.) Please inform us if your country wishes to be informed of further hits achieved through ANPR for this vehicle or number plate where the requested action could not be undertaken. (Obvestite nas, prosim, če želi biti vaša država obveščena o nadaljnjih zadetkih prek sistema za avtomatsko prepoznavanje registrskih tablic za to vozilo ali registrsko tablico, kadar se zahtevani ukrep ni mogel izvesti.)“
when receiving such an H form, the Sirene Bureau of the issuing Member State shall consult the competent authorities, which shall have the responsibility of deciding on the necessity of receiving further H forms or information passed bilaterally from the Sirene Bureau of the executing Member State.
Kadar urad SIRENE države članice izdajateljice prejme tak obrazec H, se posvetuje z organi, pristojnimi za odločanje o potrebnosti prejemanja nadaljnjih obrazcev H ali podatkov, ki jih dvostransko posreduje urad SIRENE izvršitvene države članice.
Once a year the Sirene Bureaux shall provide statistics, which have to be sent to the Agency and the Commission.
Uradi SIRENE enkrat letno zagotovijo statistične podatke, ki jih je treba poslati Agenciji in Komisiji.
The statistics shall also be sent, upon request, to the European Data Protection Supervisor and the competent national data protection authorities.
Statistični podatki se na zahtevo pošljejo tudi Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov in pristojnim nacionalnim organom za varstvo podatkov.
The statistics shall comprise the number of forms of each type sent to each of the Member States.
Statistični podatki vključujejo število obrazcev vsake vrste, poslanih posameznim državam članicam.
In particular, the statistics shall show the number of hits and flags.
Prikažejo zlasti število zadetkov in označitev.
A distinction shall be made between hits found on alerts issued by another Member State and hits found by a Member State on alerts it issued.
Razlikovati je treba med zadetki za razpise ukrepov, ki jih najde ena država članica, izdala pa jih je druga država članica, in zadetki za razpise ukrepov, ki jih najde tista država članica, ki jih je izdala.
Appendix 6 sets out the procedures and formats for the provision of statistics under this section.
V Dodatku 6 so določeni postopki in formati za zagotavljanje statističnih podatkov iz tega oddelka.
Decision of the Executive Committee of 22 December 1994 on bringing into force the Implementing Convention (SCH/Com-ex (94)29 rev. 2) (OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, p. 130).
Sklep Izvršnega odbora z dne 22. decembra 1994 o uveljavitvi Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma (SCH/Com-ex (94)29 rev. 2) (UL L 239, 22.9.2000, str. 130).
Decisions of the Executive Committee of 7 October 1997 (SCH/com-ex 97(27) rev. 4) for Italy and (SCH/com-ex 97(28)rev. 4) for Austria.
Sklepa Izvršnega odbora z dne 7. oktobra 1997 (SCH/com-ex 97(27) rev. 4) za Italijo in (SCH/com-ex 97(28) rev. 4) za Avstrijo.
Council Decision 2000/777/EC of 1 December 2000 on the application of the Schengen acquis in Denmark, Finland and Sweden, and in Iceland and Norway (OJ L 309, 9.12.2000, p. 24).
Sklep Sveta 2000/777/ES z dne 1. decembra 2000 o uporabi schengenskega pravnega reda na Danskem, Finskem in Švedskem ter v Islandiji in na Norveškem (UL L 309, 9.12.2000, str. 24).
Agreement with the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latter’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36).
Sporazum z Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda (UL L 176, 10.7.1999, str. 36).
This is without prejudice to other tasks given to Sirene Bureaux based on respective legislation in the framework of police cooperation, e.g. in the application of the Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA (OJ L 386, 29.12.2006, p. 89).
Ne glede na druge naloge, ki jih opravljajo uradi SIRENE na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje v okviru policijskega sodelovanja, npr. pri uporabi Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2006/960/PNZ (UL L 386, 29.12.2006, str. 89).
Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) (OJ L 121, 15.5.2009, p. 37).
Sklep Sveta 2009/371/PNZ z dne 6. aprila 2009 o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Europol) (UL L 121, 15.5.2009, str. 37).
See also Schengen Catalogue, recommendations and best practices.
Glej tudi Schengenski katalog, priporočila in najboljše prakse.
This second domain exists in the technical ‘pre-production environment’.
Ta druga domena obstaja v tehničnem „predproizvodnem okolju“.
Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data and subsequent amendments thereto.
Konvencija Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov in njene poznejše spremembe.
Certain transportation companies use other reference numbers.
Nekatere prevozne družbe uporabljajo druge referenčne številke.
SIS II has a provision for entering serial numbers other than the BIC.
V SIS II obstaja določba za vnos serijskih številk, ki niso številke Mednarodnega urada za zabojnike.
Due to the lack of standardisation in serial numbers for objects it is possible, for example, for two different firearms of different makes to have the same serial number.
Ker serijske številke predmetov niso standardizirane, je na primer mogoče, da imata dve različni strelni orožji različnih znamk isto serijsko številko.
Equally it is possible for an object to have the same serial number as a very different object, for example, an issued document and a piece of industrial equipment.
Prav tako je mogoče, da ima predmet isto serijsko številko kot čisto drug predmet, na primer izdan dokument ali del industrijske opreme.
Where it is clear that the serial numbers are identical but the objects are clearly not the same no consultation between Sirene Bureaux is required.
Kadar je jasno, da so serijske številke enake, predmeti pa očitno niso, se uradom SIRENE ni treba medsebojno posvetovati.
Users may be made aware that this situation can arise.
Uporabnike je mogoče opozoriti, da se lahko pojavi tak primer.
Additionally, it is possible that an object, such as a passport or car, has been stolen and reported in one country and is subsequently reported in the country of origin.
Poleg tega je mogoče, da je bil predmet, kot je potni list ali vozilo, ukraden in prijavljen v eni državi, nato pa je prijavljen še v državi izvora.
This could result in two alerts for the same object.
To bi lahko vodilo do dveh razpisov ukrepov za isti predmet.
If this matter comes to light it may be resolved by the Sirene Bureaux concerned.
Če se tak primer odkrije, ga lahko reši zadevni urad SIRENE.
For the technical implementation see the Data Exchange between Sirenes document referred to in Section 1.10.2.
Za tehnično izvedbo glej dokument o izmenjavi podatkov med uradi SIRENE iz oddelka 1.10.2.
See also Section 1.13.1 on indication of urgency in Sirene forms.
Glej tudi oddelek 1.13.1 glede navedbe nujnosti v obrazcih SIRENE.
Article 30 of Directive 2004/38/EC provides that the person refused entry shall be notified in writing thereof and informed in full on grounds on which the decision was taken unless it is contrary to the interests of State security.
V členu 30 Direktive 2004/38/ES je določeno, da je osebi pisno sporočena zavrnitev vstopa, v celoti pa je obveščena o razlogih, zaradi katerih je bila sprejeta odločba, razen če je to v nasprotju z interesi državne varnosti.
Article 26 of the SIS II Regulation refers to Article 15 of the Treaty on European Union.
Člen 26 Uredbe o SIS II se nanaša na člen 15 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
However, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty this Article 15 became Article 29 in the consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union.
Toda po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je ta člen 15 postal člen 29 v prečiščenem besedilu Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In the case of alerts for refusal of entry issued for the family members of EU citizens, it is necessary to recall that it is not possible as a matter of routine to consult SIS II prior to issuing a residence card for such a person.
Pri razpisih ukrepov zaradi zavrnitve vstopa, izdanih za družinske člane državljanov EU, je treba omeniti, da za tako osebo ni mogoče rutinsko izvesti preverjanja v SIS II pred izdajo izkaznice o stalnem prebivanju.
Article 10 of Directive 2004/38/EC lists the necessary conditions for acquiring right of residence for more than three months in a host Member State by family members of Union citizens who are third-country nationals.
V členu 10 Direktive 2004/38/ES so našteti vsi potrebni pogoji za pridobitev pravice do prebivanja za več kot tri mesece v državi članici gostiteljici za družinske člane državljanov Unije, ki so državljani tretjih držav.
This list, which is exhaustive, does not allow for routine consultation of the SIS prior to the issuing of residence cards.
Na podlagi tega seznama, ki je izčrpen, ni mogoče rutinsko iskati po SIS II pred izdajo izkaznice o stalnem prebivanju.
Article 27(3) of this Directive specifies that Member States may request, should they consider it essential, information from other Member State only regarding any previous police record (i.e. not all of the SIS II data).
V členu 27(3) te direktive je določeno, da lahko države članice, če se jim to zdi pomembno, od druge države članice zahtevajo podatke le o morebitni predhodni kazenski evidenci (tj. ne vseh podatkov iz SIS II).
Such enquiries shall not be made as a matter of routine.
Take poizvedbe se ne smejo izvajati rutinsko.
According to Directive 2004/38/EC, a person benefiting from the right of free movement may only be refused entry or stay on the grounds of public policy or public security when their personal conduct represents a genuine, immediate, and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society and when the other criteria laid down in Article 27(2) of the said Directive are respected.
Glede na Direktivo 2004/38/ES se lahko osebi, ki ima pravico do prostega gibanja, zavrne vstop ali prepove prebivanje le zaradi javnega reda, javne varnosti ali javnega zdravja, kadar njeno osebno obnašanje predstavlja resnično, sedanjo in dovolj resno grožnjo, ki prizadene osnovne interese družbe, ter kadar se ne upoštevajo druga merila iz člena 27(2) navedene direktive.
Article 27(2) stipulates:
V členu 27(2) je določeno:
‘Measures taken on grounds of public policy or public security shall comply with the principle of proportionality and shall be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned. Previous criminal convictions shall not in themselves constitute grounds for taking such measures. The personal conduct of the individual concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society. Justifications that are isolated from the particulars of the case or that rely on considerations of general prevention shall not be accepted.’ Moreover, there are additional limitations for persons enjoying the right of permanent residence who can only be refused entry or stay on serious grounds of public policy or public security as stated in Article 28(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC.
„Ukrepi, sprejeti zaradi javnega reda ali javne varnosti, so v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti in temeljijo izključno na osebnem obnašanju zadevnega posameznika. Predhodne kazenske obsodbe same po sebi še ne predstavljajo razlogov za sprejetje takšnih ukrepov. Osebno obnašanje zadevnega posameznika mora predstavljati resnično, sedanjo in dovolj resno grožnjo, ki prizadene osnovne interese družbe. Utemeljitve, ki niso neposredno povezane s podrobnostmi posameznega primera ali ki se nanašajo na splošno preventivo, niso dovoljene.“ Poleg tega obstajajo dodatne omejitve za osebe s pravico do stalnega prebivališča, ki se jim lahko zavrne vstop ali prepove prebivanje le iz resnih razlogov v zvezi z javnim redom ali javno varnostjo, kakor je navedeno v členu 28(2) Direktive 2004/38/ES.
In conformity with Directive 2004/38/EC the executing Member State cannot limit the free movement of third country nationals benefiting from the right of free movement on the sole ground that the issuing Member State maintains the alert unless the conditions referred to in the previous footnote are met.
V skladu z Direktivo 2004/38/ES izvršitvena država članica ne more omejiti prostega gibanja državljanov tretjih držav, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja, samo zato, ker država članica izdajateljica ohrani razpis ukrepa, razen če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz prejšnje opombe.
For clarity on consent in matters of the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, see Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46/EC.
Za podrobnejša pojasnila o privolitvi v zadevah v zvezi z varstvom posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov glej člen 2(h) Direktive 95/46/ES.
‘Suspicion of clone’ relates to cases where, for example, the registration documents of a vehicle are stolen and used to reregister another vehicle of the same make, model and colour which has also been stolen.
„Sum klona“ se nanaša na zadeve, kadar so na primer dokumenti za registracijo vozil ukradeni in uporabljeni za ponovno registracijo drugega vozila iste znamke, modela in barve, ki je bilo prav tako ukradeno.
The second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) will enter into operation in the first half of 2013.
Druga generacija schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) bo začela delovati v prvi polovici leta 2013.
It will only contain the indispensable information allowing the identification of a person or an object and the necessary action to be taken.
V SIS II bodo samo nujno potrebni podatki, ki omogočajo identifikacijo osebe ali stvari, in potrebni ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti.
As of 31 of March 1998, in Italy and Austria [3];
V Avstriji in Italiji se je v celoti uporabljal od 31. marca 1998 [3];
as of 26 of March 2000 in Greece [4] and finally, as of 25 March 2001, the Schengen acquis was applicable in full in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden [5].The United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland only take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis, in accordance with Decisions 2000/365/EC and 2002/192/EC respectively.
v Grčiji od 26. marca 2000 [4], na Norveškem, Islandiji, Švedskem, Danskem in Finskem pa od 25. marca 2001 [5].Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sodelujeta le pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda v skladu s Sklepom 2000/365/ES oziroma Sklepom 2002/192/ES.
In the case of the UK, the provisions in which the UK wished to take part (with exception of SIS) are applicable as of the 1 January 2005 [6].The Schengen acquis was incorporated into the legal framework of the European Union by means of protocols attached to the Treaty of Amsterdam [7] in 1999.
V primeru Združenega kraljestva se določbe, pri izvajanju katerih želi sodelovati Združeno kraljestvo (z izjemo SIS), uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2005 [6].Schengenski pravni red je bil vključen v pravni okvir Evropske unije s protokoli, priloženimi Amsterdamski pogodbi [7] leta 1999.
A Council Decision was adopted on 12 May 1999, determining the legal basis for each of the provisions or decisions which constitute the Schengen acquis, in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community and the Treaty on European Union.
Sklep Sveta, s katerim je določena pravna podlaga za vsako določbo ali sklep, ki sestavlja schengenski pravni red, skladno z ustreznimi določbami iz Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, je bil sprejet 12. maja 1999.
The Republic of Croatia signed the Treaty of Accession to the European Union on 9 December 2011 and it will become a member of the Union on 1 July 2013.
Hrvaška je Pogodbo o pristopu k Evropski uniji podpisala 9. decembra 2011, članica Unije pa bo postala 1. julija 2013.
Until that day it will participate in the work of the relevant preparatory bodies of the Council of the European Union and of other committees as observer.
Do takrat bo pri delu ustreznih pripravljalnih organov Sveta Evropske unije in drugih odborov sodelovala kot opazovalka.
further actions are requested as a result of the hit;
se zaradi zadetka zahtevajo nadaljnji ukrepi.
This may be the case, in particular, if national legislation has changed or if further information exchange about the case reveals that the circumstances referred to in Article 24(1) or Article 25 of the SIS II Decision no longer exist.
To se lahko zgodi zlasti ob spremembi nacionalne zakonodaje ali če se ob nadaljnjih izmenjavah podatkov o zadevi razkrije, da okoliščine iz člena 24(1) ali člena 25 Sklepa o SIS II ne obstajajo več.