natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was therefore concluded that the differences for which the adjustment was claimed have already been accounted for.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile razlike, zaradi katerih je bila podana zahteva za prilagoditev, že upoštevane.
Nevertheless, it has to be pointed out that the exporting producer failed to quantify the adjustment claimed.
Kljub temu je treba poudariti, da proizvajalec izvoznik zahteve za prilagoditev ni količinsko opredelil.
It stated merely that a 40 % adjustment had been granted in another proceeding.
Navedel je zgolj podatek, da je bila prilagoditev v višini 40 % odobrena v okviru drugega postopka.
An adjustment granted in another proceeding (hence specific to the particular circumstances of another proceeding) cannot serve as such as a benchmark for quantifying an adjustment in the current case.
Prilagoditev, ki je bila odobrena v drugem postopku (in je torej specifična za posebne okoliščine drugega postopka), kot taka ne more služiti kot merilo za količinsko opredelitev prilagoditve v tem postopku.
Following the additional disclosure (inviting comments on the steel thickness adjustment), the exporting producer presented additional claims for adjustments (unrelated to the steel thickness adjustment): adjustment for coating, handle, and steel prices in Brazil.
Po dodatnem razkritju (s pozivom po predložitvi pripomb na izvedeno prilagoditev povezano z debelino jekla), je proizvajalec izvoznik predložil dodatne zahtevke za prilagoditve (ki niso povezane s prilagoditvijo glede debeline jekla): prilagoditev zaradi premaza, ročaja in cen jekla v Braziliji.
It is noted first and foremost that the claims were submitted after the deadline for comments and were thus formally inadmissible.
Najprej je treba opozoriti na dejstvo, da so bile zahteve predložene po roku za oddajo pripomb in jih zato ni mogoče sprejeti.
In any case the claims were either not quantified or not substantiated.
Ne glede na to pa zahteve bodisi niso bile količinsko opredeljene bodisi niso bile utemeljene.
The company neither provided evidence for its claims nor did it explain how the extent of different adjustments had been or should be calculated.
Družba ni predložila dokazov za svoje trditve, niti ni pojasnila, na kakšen način je bila ali naj bi bila višina različnih prilagoditev izračunana.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price of the product concerned.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila narejena primerjava različnih tehtanih povprečne normalne vrednosti glede na tip s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno zadevnega izdelka.
The dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is 70,8 %.
Stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije, brez plačane dajatve, je 70,8 %.
As regards the dumping margins for all exporting producers in the original investigation other than Noblelift, they ranged from 28,5 % to 46,7 %.
Kar zadeva stopnjo dampinga za vse proizvajalce izvoznike v prvotni preiskavi, razen Noblelift, so bile te od 28,5 % do 46,7 %.
Given that in the current review only Noblelift cooperated and that the cooperation could be considered high since the vast majority of Chinese exports were those of Noblelift, the Commission revised the country-wide dumping margin for all other exporters as well.
Glede na to, da je v sedanjem pregledu sodeloval sam Noblelift in da se to sodelovanje lahko šteje za intenzivno, saj veliko večino kitajskega izvoza izvede Noblelift, je Komisija popravila stopnjo dampinga za celo državo tudi za vse druge izvoznike.
Consequently, the residual dumping margin should be set at the same level as that of Noblelift, i.e. 70,8 %.
Zato bi bilo treba preostalo stopnjo dampinga določiti na enaki ravni kot za Noblelift, tj. 70,8 %.
One party claimed that the country-wide duty should not be set at the level of the sole cooperating exporting producer’s dumping margin as there is no evidence that the vast majority of imports were those of that sole cooperating exporter.
Ena stranka je trdila, da določitev stopnje dajatve za vso državo, ki je določena na ravni stopnje dampinga za edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ni ustrezna, saj ni dokazov, ki bi potrjevali, da večina uvoza prihaja od zadevnega edinega sodelujočega izvoznika.
In this respect, it has been confirmed that according to statistical data the vast majority of imports from the PRC were those of the sole cooperating exporting producer.
V zvezi s tem je bilo potrjeno, da glede na statistične podatke večina uvoza iz LRK dejansko prihaja od edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The claim has been therefore rejected.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
D. LASTING NATURE OF CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES
D. TRAJNA NARAVA SPREMENJENIH OKOLIŠČIN
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je preučilo tudi, ali bi se razumno lahko štelo, da so spremenjene okoliščine trajne narave.
In this regard the original investigation did not establish a substantial price difference between prices of raw materials procured locally in the PRC by the Chinese exporting producers (including Noblelift) and those at international markets.
V tem pogledu prvotna preiskava ni ugotovila bistvene razlike v ceni surovin, ki so jih na domačem trgu v LRK nabavili kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki (vključno z Noblelift), in surovin, ki so bile nabavljene na mednarodnih trgih.
The circumstances have significantly changed between 2004 (time of the original investigation) and 2011 (the RIP) where the price of hot-rolled steel, the main raw material, stood between 24 % and 31 % below international prices.
Okoliščine so se bistveno spremenile med letoma 2004 (čas prvotne preiskave) in 2011 (obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom), ko so bile cene vroče valjanega jekla, tj. glavne surovine, od 24 do 31 % nižje od mednarodnih cen.
They did not reflect market values as a result of price distortions in the steel market in the PRC (see recital 20 above).
Te cene niso odražale tržnih vrednosti kot posledice izkrivljanja cen na trgu jekla v LRK (glej uvodno izjavo 20).
Indeed, the Chinese steel market changed significantly within these seven years and the PRC has shifted in the meantime from a net steel importing country to a sizeable steel producer and exporter worldwide, which fact could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Dejansko se je kitajski trg jekla v teh sedmih letih precej spremenil in LRK se je v tem času iz neto uvoznice jekla spremenila v pomembno proizvajalko in svetovno izvoznico jekla. Za to okoliščino bi lahko zato utemeljeno sklepali, da je trajne narave.
In addition, Chinese high-tech enterprises including Noblelift are receiving State benefits in the form of preferential income tax (15 %) since 2008.
Poleg tega kitajske visokotehnološke družbe, vključno z Noblelift, od leta 2008 prejemajo državno podporo v obliki preferencialnega davka na dohodek (15 %).
In the investigation period of the original investigation, the companies were subject to the standard rate of 25 %.
V obdobju prvotne preiskave je za družbe veljala splošna stopnja davka na dohodek v višini 25 %.
This changed circumstance could also reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Tudi za te spremenjene okoliščine je mogoče razumno sklepati, da so trajne narave.
It was therefore considered that the circumstances that led to the initiation of this interim review are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the interim review.
Zato se je štelo, da se okoliščine, ki so privedle do začetka tega vmesnega pregleda, v bližnji prihodnosti verjetno ne bodo toliko spremenile, da bi vplivale na ugotovitve iz vmesnega pregleda.
Therefore it was concluded that the changed circumstances are of a lasting nature and that the application of the measure at its current level is no longer justified.
Zaradi tega se je sklenilo, da so spremenjene okoliščine trajne narave in da uporaba ukrepa na sedanji ravni ni več upravičena.
E. ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
E. PROTIDAMPINŠKI UKREPI
In light of the results of this review investigation and since the new dumping margin of 70,8 % is lower than the injury elimination level established in the original investigation (see recitals 120 to 123 of Regulation (EC) No 128/2005), it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned both from Noblelift and from all other exporting producers to 70,8 %.
Glede na rezultate te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in ker je nova stopnja dampinga v višini 70,8 % nižja od stopnje odprave škode, določene v prvotni preiskavi (glej uvodne izjave 120 do 123 Uredbe (ES) št. 128/2005), se zdi primerno spremeniti protidampinško dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka Noblelift in vseh drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, na 70,8 %.
According to that party, the current practice whereby injury is not assessed, constitutes a breach of the lesser duty rule.
Po mnenju te stranke sedanja praksa, po kateri se škoda ne oceni, krši pravilo nižje dajatve.
The party also claimed that a full interim review should have been opened.
Stranka je prav tako trdila, da bi bilo treba uvesti popolni vmesni pregled.
In this respect it is noted that since the Commission initiated a partial interim review limited to dumping, injury could not be reassessed in this framework.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da škode ni bilo mogoče ponovno oceniti v tem okviru, ker je Komisija začela izvajati delni vmesni pregled, omejen na damping.
According to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation the continued imposition of measures may be reviewed, where warranted, on the initiative of the Commission.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je potrebo po nadaljevanju izvajanja ukrepov mogoče pregledati, kjer je to upravičeno, na pobudo Komisije.
Hence, there is no obligation for the Commission to initiate an ex-officio interim review covering both dumping and injury, and in any event it should be warranted.
Zato Komisija ni zavezana, da po uradni dolžnosti začne izvajati vmesni pregled v zvezi z dampingom in škodo; tak pregled bi namreč moral biti upravičen.
In this case, the information and evidence at the Commission’s disposal was sufficient for the initiation of an interim review limited to dumping.
V tem postopku so bili informacije in dokazi, ki jih ima Komisija na voljo, zadostni za začetek vmesnega pregleda, omejenega na damping.
Moreover, if injury is always to be assessed in interim reviews the possibility of having a partial interim review limited to dumping as provided for in Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation would be devoid of meaning.
Poleg tega bi možnost uvedbe postopka delnega vmesnega pregleda, omejenega na damping, iz člena 11(3) osnovne uredbe izgubila pomen, če bi bilo škodo vedno treba oceniti v postopku vmesnega pregleda.
The claim has therefore to be rejected.
Zato je treba to trditev zavrniti.
Nevertheless it is recalled that the interested party in question has the possibility to request a partial review of injury pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Kljub temu je treba spomniti, da lahko zadevna zainteresirana stranka v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe zahteva delni pregled škode.
The lesser duty rule has been fully respected and the newly established dumping margin was indeed compared with the injury elimination level established in the original investigation (the latest injury finding).
Pravilo nižje dajatve se je v celoti upoštevalo in na novo določena stopnja dampinga se je dejansko primerjala s stopnjo odprave škode, določeno v prvotni preiskavi (zadnja ocena škode).
One party claimed that a minimum import price would be better suited in the current case. Alternatively, a fixed duty should be imposed.
Ena stranka je trdila, da bi bila v tem postopku bodisi primernejša minimalna uvozna cena bodisi bi bilo treba uvesti fiksno dajatev.
In this respect it is noted that neither the minimum import price nor the fixed duty are suitable for products which exist in a multitude of individual types with varying prices, which are also subject to continuous changes and upgrades.
Glede tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da niti minimalna uvozna cena niti fiksna dajatev nista primerni za izdelke, ki obstajajo v številnih posameznih vrstah z različnimi cenami, ki so prav tako predmet nenehnih sprememb in posodobitev.
A multitude of duty levels would be very difficult to administer.
Številne stopnje dajatev bi bilo zelo težko uporabljati.
An additional limitation of the current case is that the minimum import price would have to be based on the normal value (since the duty is based on dumping), which is based on confidential data of one company in an analogue country market.
Dodatna omejitev v tem postopku je, da bi morala minimalna uvozna cena temeljiti na normalni vrednosti (ker dajatev temelji na dampingu), tj. vrednosti, ki temelji na zaupnih podatkih ene družbe na trgu primerljive države.
The exporting producer expressed interest in an undertaking within the statutory deadlines.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je izrazil interes za prevzem obveznosti v predpisanih rokih.
However, no formal offer was submitted and thus the Commission was not in a position to consider it further.
Vendar pa ni predložil nobene formalne ponudbe, zato Komisiji v zvezi s tem ni bila omogočena nadaljnja preučitev.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to amend the duty rates applicable to exporting producers and were given the opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in ugotovitvah, na podlagi katerih je bila nameravana sprememba stopenj dajatev, ki se uporabljajo za proizvajalce izvoznike, in so imele možnost, da podajo svoje pripombe o teh dejstvih in ugotovitvah.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered.
Upoštevale so se ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani.
It is noted that pursuant to Article 1(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, the 70,8 % anti-dumping duty imposed to ‘all other companies’ by this Regulation applies to hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, as defined in Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, consigned from Thailand whether declared as originating in Thailand or not,
Opozoriti je treba, da se v skladu s členom 1(3) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011 protidampinška dajatev v višini 70,8 %, ki je s to uredbo uvedena za „vse druge družbe“, nanaša na ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet in njihove osnovne dele, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 1(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011, ki so poslani s Tajske, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom s Tajske ali ne –
Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, is replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, for the products described in paragraph 1 and produced by the companies listed bellow shall be as follows:
Stopnja veljavne dokončne protidampinške dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelke iz odstavka 1, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju, je:
Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd, 58, Jing Yi Road, Economy Development Zone, Changxing, Zhejiang Province, 313100, PRC
Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd, 58, Jing Yi Road, Economy Development Zone, Changxing, Zhejiang Province, 313100, LRK
OJ L 268, 13.10.2011, p. 1.
UL L 268, 13.10.2011, str. 1.
OJ C 41, 14.2.2012, p. 14.
UL C 41, 14.2.2012, str. 14.
OJ L 344, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
UL L 344, 14.12.2012, str. 1.
As far as cost factors are concerned (e.g. productivity), those should not be picked and assessed individually.
Kar zadeva stroškovne dejavnike (npr. produktivnost), ti ne bi smeli biti ločeno izbrani in ocenjevani.
Rather, a comprehensive analysis would be needed to assess whether advantages in relation to one cost factor (e.g. productivity) are possibly compensated by disadvantages in others.
Nasprotno, treba bi bilo izvesti obsežno analizo, ki bi ocenila, v kakšni meri se prednosti, ki jih prinaša določen dejavnik stroškov (npr. produktivnost), morebiti izravnavajo s pomanjkljivostmi v drugih dejavnikih.
One party claimed that the newly established dumping margin should not have been compared with the injury elimination level established in the original investigation.
Ena stranka je trdila, da novo določene stopnje dampinga ne bi smeli primerjati s stopnjo odprave škode, določeno v prvotni preiskavi.
Rather, an injury elimination level should be established in every investigation, even in a partial review limited to dumping.
Po njenem mnenju bi bilo namreč treba stopnjo odprave škode določiti v vsaki preiskavi, tudi v postopku delnega pregleda, omejenega na damping.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 373/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 373/2013
approving the active substance Candida oleophila strain O, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobritvi aktivne snovi Candida oleophila, sev O, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in spremembi Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the United Kingdom received on 12 July 2006 an application from Bionext sprl for the inclusion of the active substance Candida oleophila strain O in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Združeno kraljestvo 12. julija 2006 prejelo zahtevek družbe Bionext sprl za vključitev aktivne snovi Candida oleophila, sev O, v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2007/380/EC confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Z Odločbo 2007/380/ES je bilo potrjeno, da je dokumentacija „popolna“ v smislu načelnega izpolnjevanja zahtev po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 15 November 2011.
Država članica poročevalka je 15. novembra 2011 predložila osnutek poročila o oceni.
The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Candida oleophila strain O [4] on 24 October 2012.
Agencija je 24. oktobra 2012 Komisiji predložila sklep o pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo Candida oleophila, sev O [4].
The draft assessment report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and the draft assessment report was finalised on 15 March 2013 in the format of the Commission review report for Candida oleophila strain O.
Osnutek poročila o oceni in sklep Agencije so države članice in Komisija pregledale v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico osnutka poročila o oceni pripravile 15. marca 2013 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu Candida oleophila, sev O.
It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing Candida oleophila strain O may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) and Article 5(3) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
Različne preiskave so pokazale, da se za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo Candida oleophila, sev O, lahko pričakuje, da na splošno izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) ter člena 5(3) Direktive 91/414/EGS, zlasti pri uporabah, ki so bile preučene in podrobno navedene v poročilu Komisije o pregledu.
It is therefore appropriate to approve Candida oleophila strain O.
Zato je primerno, da se Candida oleophila, sev O, odobri.
Member States should be allowed a period of six months after approval to review authorisations of plant protection products containing Candida oleophila strain O. Member States should, as appropriate, vary, replace or withdraw authorisations.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba omogočiti, da v šestih mesecih po odobritvi pregledajo registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo Candida oleophila, sev O. Države članice bi morale registracije po potrebi spremeniti, nadomestiti ali preklicati.
The experience gained from inclusions in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC of active substances assessed in the framework of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3600/92 of 11 December 1992 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the first stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8 (2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [5] has shown that difficulties can arise in interpreting the duties of holders of existing authorisations in relation to access to data.
Izkušnje iz vključitev aktivnih snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, ocenjenih na podlagi Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 3600/92 z dne 11. decembra 1992 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje prve faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [5], so pokazale, da se lahko pri razlagi obveznosti imetnikov veljavnih registracij glede dostopa do podatkov pojavijo težave.
The active substance Candida oleophila strain O, as specified in Annex I, is approved subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Aktivna snov Candida oleophila, sev O, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi I, se odobri v skladu s pogoji iz navedene priloge.
Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing Candida oleophila strain O as an active substance by 31 March 2014.
Države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 do 31. marca 2014 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo veljavne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo Candida oleophila, sev O, kot aktivno snov.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing Candida oleophila strain O as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances, all of which were listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 by 30 September 2013 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC and taking into account the column on specific provisions of Annex I to this Regulation.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice znova ocenijo vsako registrirano fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje Candida oleophila, sev O, kot edino aktivno snov ali kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, vključenih v Prilogo k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011, najpozneje do 30. septembra 2013 po enotnih načelih iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, na podlagi dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, in ob upoštevanju stolpca o posebnih določbah iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
in the case of a product containing Candida oleophila strain O as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 March 2015 at the latest; or
če sredstvo vsebuje Candida oleophila, sev O, kot edino aktivno snov, po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo registracijo najpozneje do 31. marca 2015; ali