natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was explained in the provisional Regulation that the Commission established separate normal values for both unrefined and refined oxalic acid.
V začasni uredbi je bilo pojasnjeno, da je Komisija določila ločene normalne vrednosti za nerafinirano in rafinirano oksalno kislino.
While the normal value for unrefined oxalic acid was determined on the basis of the normal value established for India, the normal value for refined oxalic acid, which is not produced in India, was constructed on the basis of the manufacturing costs for Indian unrefined oxalic acid, adjusted with an uplift of 12 % to take into account additional manufacturing costs, plus SG&A and profit.
Normalna vrednost za nerafinirano oksalno kislino je bila določena na podlagi normalne vrednosti, določene za Indijo, normalna vrednost za rafinirano oksalno kislino, ki se ne proizvaja v Indiji, pa je bila konstruirana na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov za indijsko nerafinirano oksalno kislino in prilagojena z 12-odstotnim povišanjem, da se upoštevajo dodatni proizvodni stroški, PSA-stroški in dobiček.
Both cooperating producers from China contested the 12 % uplift for additional manufacturing costs, claiming that these additional costs have never been verified by the Commission and appear to be simply a rough estimation based on a methodology that has not been disclosed to them at the time of the provisional disclosure.
Oba sodelujoča proizvajalca iz Kitajske sta nasprotovala 12-odstotnemu povišanju za dodatne proizvodne stroške, pri čemer sta trdila, da Komisija teh dodatnih stroškov ni nikoli preverila in da kaže, da gre za grobo oceno na podlagi metodologije, ki jima v času začasnega razkritja ni bila razkrita.
One of the exporting producers claimed that it had estimated the additional manufacturing cost at only 5 % although it did not substantiate this claim with any supporting evidence.
Po oceni enega proizvajalca izvoznika so dodatni proizvodni stroški le 5-odstotni, čeprav te trditve ni utemeljil z dokazi.
It is pointed out that the uplift has been determined on the basis of information provided by the cooperating Chinese exporting producers themselves.
Treba je poudariti, da je bilo povišanje določeno na podlagi informacij, ki sta jih predložila sodelujoča kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika.
First, it is noted that the same company which now alleges that the additional manufacturing cost is only around 5 % had originally explicitly referred to additional costs of 10-15 % in its MET/IT claim form.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da se je ista družba, ki zdaj trdi, da dodatni proizvodni stroški znašajo le okoli 5 %, v zahtevku za TGO/IO izrecno sklicevala na dodatne stroške v višini 10–15 %.
Second, during the verification visits at the companies’ premises, both cooperating producers confirmed that the additional costs for manufacturing refined oxalic acid as compared to unrefined oxalic acid were in the band of 10-12 %.
Drugič, oba sodelujoča proizvajalca sta med preveritvenim obiskom v prostorih družb potrdila, da dodatni stroški za proizvodnjo rafinirane oksalne kisline znašajo 10–12 % v primerjavi z nerafinirano oksalno kislino.
Third, this latter level of 10-12 % additional manufacturing cost was also supported by calculations of the Union industry.
Tretjič je bila ta stopnja dodatnih proizvodnih stroškov v višini 10–12 % potrjena v izračunih industrije Unije.
In view of the information provided by the cooperating producers an uplift of 12 % was considered appropriate.
Na podlagi informacij, ki sta jih predložila sodelujoča proizvajalca, se je 12-odstotno povišanje zdelo primerno.
Therefore in the absence of any substantiated information or supporting evidence justifying a lower uplift the findings in recitals 35 to 37 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih utemeljenih informacij ali dokazil, ki upravičujejo nižje povišanje, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 35 do 37 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Both exporting producers from the PRC were granted IT, therefore their export prices were based on the prices actually paid or payable by the first independent customer in the Union in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
IO je bila odobrena obema proizvajalcema izvoznikoma iz LRK, zato so njune izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe temeljile na cenah, ki jih je prva neodvisna stranka v Uniji dejansko plačevala ali jih plačuje.
In the absence of comments with regard to the export price, recital 38 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izvozno ceno ni bilo pripomb, se uvodna izjava 38 začasne uredbe potrdi.
One of the cooperating producers claimed that the SG&A expenses of its related trader and commissions should not be removed from the export price as an adjustment under Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
En sodelujoči proizvajalec je trdil, da se PSA-stroški njegovega povezanega trgovca in provizije ne bi smeli odšteti od izvozne cene kot prilagoditve v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
The producer stated that the direct selling costs of their related trader had already been removed from the export price in order to arrive at an ex-works price to compare with the normal value on the same basis.
Proizvajalec je trdil, da so bili neposredni prodajni stroški povezanega trgovca odšteti od izvozne cene že pri izračunu cene na podlagi franko tovarna, da se je primerjala z normalno vrednostjo na isti podlagi.
The producer argued that their related trader was a wholly owned subsidiary and, in view of the export profit distribution strategy within the group, did not charge any commission.
Proizvajalec je trdil, da je njegov povezani trgovec podružnica v celoti v lasti in ni zaračunaval nobene provizije na podlagi strategije delitve izvoznega dobička.
Furthermore, according to the company, the remaining SG&A expenses represented the combined costs of operating the company and were not expenses directly related to sales and should therefore not be removed from the export price.
Po mnenju družbe so preostali PSA-stroški predstavljali združene stroške vodenja družbe in tako niso bili stroški, neposredno povezani s prodajo, zato se ne smejo odšteti od izvozne cene.
Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation states that commissions are to be understood to include the mark-up received by a trader if the functions of such a trader are similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Člen 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe določa, da se izraz „provizije“ razume tako, da vključuje pribitek, ki ga je prejel trgovec, če so funkcije takšnega trgovca podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
It is therefore irrelevant whether a commission was actually paid or not.
Zato ni pomembno, ali je bila provizija dejansko plačana ali ne.
What is relevant is whether the trader re-sold the goods with a mark-up and whether the functions of the trader were similar to those of an agent.
Pomembno pa je, ali je trgovec ponovno prodal blago s pribitkom in ali so funkcije trgovca podobne funkcijam zastopnika.
Evidence on file, obtained before and during the inspection of the trading company, shows that the trader during the IP sold oxalic acid produced by the related producer to a customer in the EU.
Dokazila iz dokumentacije, pridobljena pred pregledom trgovske družbe in med njim, kažejo, da je trgovec stranki v EU v OP prodajal oksalno kislino, ki jo je proizvedel povezani proizvajalec.
At the same time the producer was also exporting directly to the same customer in the EU.
Hkrati je proizvajalec izvažal neposredno isti stranki v EU.
The related trader therefore duplicated the effort of the producer with different staff in a different office in a different city, thereby incurring its own costs that are reflected in their export price.
Povezani trgovec je zato podvojil prizadevanja proizvajalca, in sicer z drugim osebjem, v drugi pisarni in drugem mestu, zaradi česar je imel lastne stroške, ki se odražajo v izvozni ceni.
It is also clear from evidence on file that the trading company purchased the exported goods from the related exporting producer and re-sold them, with a mark-up, in its own name, after having itself concluded price negotiations with the final independent customer.
Iz dokumentacije prav tako izhaja, da je trgovska družba kupovala izvoženo blago od povezanega proizvajalca izvoznika in ga potem, ko je zaključila pogajanja o ceni s končno neodvisno stranko, v lastnem imenu ponovno prodajala s pribitkom.
Evidence was also collected regarding the trading company performing the functions of an agent.
Zbrana so bila tudi dokazila glede trgovske družbe, ki opravlja funkcije zastopnika.
This evidence firstly shows that the producer sold significant volumes of the product concerned directly to the EU as well as exporting to the EU via their related trading company.
Ta dokazila kažejo, da je proizvajalec znatne količine zadevnega izdelka prodajal neposredno v EU in hkrati izvažal v EU prek povezane trgovske družbe.
Only about one third of sales to the EU were made via this related company.
Ta povezana družba je opravila samo eno tretjino prodaje v EU.
The trader also re-sold oxalic acid from other unrelated producers.
Trgovec je tudi nadalje prodajal oksalno kislino drugih nepovezanih proizvajalcev.
Evidence on file shows that over half of the trader’s purchases of oxalic acid were from unrelated suppliers and less than half of their purchases came from their related producer.
Dokazila iz dokumentacije kažejo, da je trgovec več kot polovico oksalne kisline kupil pri nepovezanih dobaviteljih, manj kot polovico pa pri svojem povezanem proizvajalcu.
The trader could thus not be considered as the internal export sales department of the producing exporter despite its relationship with the exporting producer.
Trgovec se zato kljub povezavi s proizvajalcem izvoznikom ne more šteti za interno izvozno službo proizvajalca izvoznika.
It is also clear from evidence submitted and verified that the trader only pays for the goods supplied from the related exporting producer once the customer in the EU has paid the trader.
Iz predloženih in preverjenih dokazil prav tako izhaja, da trgovec blago, ki mu ga dobavi povezani proizvajalec izvoznik, plača šele potem, ko stranka v EU plača trgovcu.
The financial risk therefore remains with the producer and not the trader.
Finančno tveganje tako nosi proizvajalec in ne trgovec.
It was therefore considered that the trader was carrying out functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Zato se je štelo, da trgovec opravlja funkcije, podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki za svoje delo prejema provizijo.
Accordingly, the claim that no adjustments should be made for commission under Article 2(10)(i) is rejected.
Zato se trditev, da se za provizijo v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) ne sme opraviti prilagoditev, zavrne.
Also the claim that SG&A expenses should not be taken into account as they do not include direct selling expenses cannot be accepted.
Sprejeti se ne more niti trditve, da se PSA-stroški ne smejo upoštevati, ker ne vključujejo neposrednih prodajnih stroškov.
Such overhead costs have an impact on the cost structure of the company and therefore affect the export price.
Taki skupni stroški vplivajo na stroškovno strukturo družbe in tako vplivajo tudi na izvozno ceno.
Therefore, a portion of these costs was removed from the export price to allow for a fair comparison of normal value and export price, ex-works.
Zato je bil del teh stroškov odštet od izvozne cene, da se omogoči poštena primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene na podlagi franko tovarna.
This claim is rejected.
Ta trditev se zavrne.
The commission has been established on the basis of the profit margin of an unrelated EU importer rather than on the actual mark-up of the trader, which was significantly higher.
Provizija je bila določena na podlagi stopnje dobička nepovezanega uvoznika EU in ne na dejanskem pribitku trgovca, ki je bil znatno višji.
This methodology was deemed more appropriate as the actual mark-up would have been based on internal transfer prices not reflecting actual market conditions.
Ta metodologija se je štela za primernejšo, saj bi dejanski pribitek temeljil na internih transfernih cenah, ki ne odražajo dejanskih tržnih razmer.
In the absence of any further comments with regard to the comparison of the normal value and the export price, recitals 39 to 44 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene ni bilo nobenih nadaljnjih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 39 do 44 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One group of exporting producers claimed that individual dumping margins should be established separately for unrefined and refined oxalic acid.
Ena skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdila, da je treba določiti individualne stopnje dampinga ločeno za nerafinirano in rafinirano oksalno kislino.
They argued that although dumping margins were established on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price of the product concerned type by type, one common dumping margin for both types of oxalic acid was established.
Trdili so, da čeprav so bile stopnje dampinga določene na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno zadevnega izdelka za vsako vrsto, je bila določena ena skupna stopnja dampinga za obe vrsti oksalne kisline.
They claimed that it would be more appropriate to establish a dumping margin for each type of oxalic acid as the group consists of two producing companies of which one produces refined oxalic acid while the other produces unrefined oxalic acid.
Prav tako so trdili, da bi bilo primernejše določiti stopnjo dampinga za vsako vrsto oksalne kisline, saj skupino sestavljata dve družbi proizvajalki, ena proizvaja rafinirano oksalno kislino, druga pa nerafinirano oksalno kislino.
Unrefined oxalic acid can be substituted by refined oxalic acid.
Nerafinirana oksalna kislina se lahko nadomesti z rafinirano oksalno kislino.
Both types of oxalic acid are included under the same CN code and the different types cannot easily be distinguished from each other.
Obe vrsti oksalne kisline sta vključeni pod isto oznako KN, razlikovanje med obema vrstama pa ni preprosto.
The purity of the oxalic acid is the same, the difference is in the levels of other products in the remaining ‘waste’ product.
Čistost oksalne kisline je enaka, razlika je le v deležu drugih izdelkov v odpadnem izdelku.
As they both fall within the definition of the product concerned, one dumping margin has been established in line with usual practice.
Ker opredelitev zadevnega izdelka zajema obe vrsti, je bila v skladu z običajno prakso določena ena stopnja dampinga.
Given the significant price difference between the two types and the difficulties involved in distinguishing them from each other individual dumping margins for refined and unrefined oxalic acid would lead to an increased risk of circumvention.
Glede na znatno razliko v ceni med obema vrstama in težavno razlikovanje med njima bi individualne stopnje dampinga za rafinirano in nerafinirano oksalno kislino pomenile večje tveganje za izogibanje ukrepom.
The claim to have individual dumping margins for refined and unrefined oxalic acid, is rejected and the dumping margins, as established in recitals 45 and 46 of the provisional Regulation, are confirmed.
Trditev, da sta za rafinirano in nerafinirano oksalno kislino potrebni individualni stopnji dampinga, se zavrne, stopnji dampinga iz uvodnih izjav 45 in 46 začasne uredbe pa se potrdita.
Finally, the same exporting producer group questioned the different dumping margins established for the two groups of exporting producers from the PRC and requested clarification of the calculation methodology and the classification of refined and unrefined oxalic acid, given the difference in the dumping margins found between the two groups of exporters.
Ista skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov je tudi izrazila dvom v različni stopnji dampinga, določeni za dve skupini proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, in zaradi razlike v stopnjah dampinga, ugotovljenih za dve skupini proizvajalcev, zahtevala pojasnilo metodologije izračuna in klasifikacije rafinirane in nerafinirane oksalne kisline.
The same methodology has been used in respect of both groups of exporting producers from the PRC and the weighted average export price of the product concerned includes both refined and unrefined oxalic acid.
Za obe skupini proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK je bila uporabljena ista metodologija, tehtana povprečna izvozna cena zadevnega izdelka pa vključuje rafinirano in nerafinirano oksalno kislino.
The explanation as to the different dumping margins rests therefore simply on the relative weight of exports of the respective types, considering that refined oxalic acid is normally sold at a higher price than unrefined.
Različni stopnji dampinga gre pojasniti z relativno težo izvoza zadevnih vrst, saj je cena za rafinirano oksalno kislino običajno višja kot za nerafinirano.
The definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Dokončni stopnji dampinga, izraženi kot delež cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, sta:
Shandong Fengyuan Chemicals Stock Co., Ltd and Shandong Fengyuan Uranus Advanced material Co., Ltd
Shandong Fengyuan Chemicals Stock Co., Ltd in Shandong Fengyuan Uranus Advanced Material Co., Ltd
In the absence of other comments with regard to the dumping margins, recitals 47 to 48 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s stopnjami dampinga ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 47 in 48 začasne uredbe potrdita.
On this basis the country-wide level of dumping is definitely established at 52,2 % of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, and recital 49 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi tega je stopnja dampinga na ravni države dokončno določena pri 52,2 % cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, uvodna izjava 49 začasne uredbe pa se potrdi.
An exporting producer submitted that the reference to two Union producers constituting the Union industry in recitals 50 and 51 of the provisional Regulation (the complainant and a second non-cooperating producer) did not properly reflect the situation regarding macro economic indicators.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da sklicevanja dveh proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljata industrijo Unije, iz uvodnih izjav 50 in 51 začasne uredbe (pritožnik in drugi nesodelujoči proizvajalec), niso ustrezno izražale stanja glede makroekonomskih kazalnikov.
It was also argued that data regarding the non-cooperating producer as well as the data from a third Union producer having stopped the production of OA should be disregarded and not be included in some macro indicators (see recitals 72, 74 and 78 of the provisional Regulation).
Trdil je tudi, da se podatki glede nesodelujočega proizvajalca in podatki od tretjega proizvajalca Unije, ki je ustavil proizvodnjo oksalne kisline, ne smejo upoštevati in vključiti v nekatere makro kazalnike iz uvodnih izjav 72, 74 in 78 začasne uredbe.
First, it is hereby confirmed that contrary to what was stated in recitals 50 and 51 of the provisional Regulation, there were in fact three producers of the product concerned in the Union during the period considered constituting the Union industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, which thus represent 100 % of the Union production.
Prvič, potrdi se, da so v nasprotju z navedbami iz uvodnih izjav 50 in 51 začasne uredbe v obravnavanem obdobju zadevni izdelek proizvajali trije proizvajalci v Uniji, ki so predstavljali industrijo Unijo v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe in tako predstavljajo 100 % proizvodnje Unije.
Second, the claim that figures pertaining to the non-cooperating producer and the third Union producer having ceased its operation in 2008 should be disregarded is rejected, as it is correct to include all known figures related to the period considered for the purpose of the injury analysis in order to achieved the best informed representation of the economic situation of the Union industry as prescribed in Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Drugič, trditev, da se podatki glede nesodelujočega proizvajalca in tretjega proizvajalca Unije, ki je proizvodnjo ustavil leta 2008, ne smejo upoštevati, se zavrne, saj je pravilno, da se vsi znani podatki za obravnavano obdobje vključijo v analizo škode, da se kar najbolje predstavijo gospodarske razmere industrije Unije, kot določa člen 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
The same exporting producer also argued that the reasons for which this third producer has ceased its production of the like product were not properly examined during the investigation.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da razlogi, zakaj je tretji proizvajalec ustavil proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka, v preiskavi niso bili ustrezno preučeni.
However, this matter was examined during the investigation and the company simply invoked the fact that it had stopped the production of the like product for ‘internal reasons’ without giving any further explanations.
Vendar je zadeva v preiskavi bila preučena; družba je le navedla, da je proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka ustavila iz „internih“ razlogov, ni pa dala nobenih nadaljnjih pojasnil.
In addition, one exporting producer concurred with this explanation and claimed that the decision to stop the production was not due to the alleged dumping practices from exporting producers in China, thus contradicting the information which was made available by the complainant in the non-confidential version of the complaint, in which it is stated that ‘[the company] ceased production, once and for all, closing the factory because of aggressive dumping from China and India’.
Poleg tega se je en proizvajalec izvoznik strinjal z razlago in trdil, da odločitev za ustavitev proizvodnje ni temeljila na domnevnem dampingu proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Kitajske, kar je v nasprotju z informacijami, ki jih je dal pritožnik v nezaupni različici pritožbe, v kateri je navedel, da je „[družba] dokončno ustavila proizvodnjo in zaprla tovarno zaradi agresivnega dampinga iz Kitajske in Indije“.
However, the exporting producer did not provide any different information with regard to the alleged production figures related to this third Union producer.
Vendar proizvajalec izvoznik ni predložil nobenih drugih informacij glede domnevnih podatkov o proizvodnji tretjega proizvajalca Unije.
Therefore, this issue does not devaluate the fact that the data related to that third EU producer could be used in the current investigation.
Ta zadeva zato ne spodkopava dejstva, da se lahko podatki glede navedenega tretjega proizvajalca EU uporabijo v sedanji preiskavi.
Another exporting producer argued that the minimum threshold for the standing at initiation was not properly disclosed and in fact was not met.
Drug proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da minimalni prag za začetek preiskave ni bil primerno razkrit in dejansko ni bil izpolnjen.
As mentioned in recital 2 of the provisional Regulation, the complainant represented more than 25 % of the total Union production of oxalic acid and no producer expressing opposition has come forward prior to the initiation of the investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 2 začasne uredbe, je pritožnik predstavljal več kot 25 % proizvodnje oksalne kisline v Uniji, pred začetkom preiskave pa noben proizvajalec ni izrazil nasprotovanja.
An information note was made available in the non-confidential file summarising the results of the standing examination at initiation stage.
V nezaupni dokumentaciji je informativno obvestilo, v katerem je povzetek rezultatov preučitve stanja na začetku preiskave.
Furthermore, the injury analysis made pursuant to Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation covered a major proportion of the Union Industry.
Poleg tega je analiza škode, opravljena v skladu s členom 4(1) osnovne uredbe, zajela večji del industrije Unije.