natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this respect it should be noted that the documents showing the origin of the parts used in the assembly of the bicycles exported to the Union have significant importance for the assessment of compliance with the conditions of Article 13(2)(b).
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da so dokumenti, ki izkazujejo poreklo uporabljenih delov pri sestavljanju koles, izvoženih v Unijo, zelo pomembni za oceno skladnosti s pogoji člena 13(2)(b).
Also, as mentioned in recital 37, the data submitted by the company was unverifiable.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 37, podatkov, ki jih je predložila družba, tudi ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
In addition, the company admitted on spot that the parts purchased from the PRC were actually not recorded in its accounts and consequently the compliance with the criteria set out in Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation could not have been determined.
Poleg tega je družba na kraju samem priznala, da deli, kupljeni iz LRK, dejansko niso bili zabeleženi v njenih računih, zato ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti skladnosti z merili, določenimi v členu 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the claims are rejected.
Zato se navedene trditve zavrnejo.
Another company from Sri Lanka claimed that had it known that the exports to the Union from Sri Lanka could be subject to the anti-dumping duty as extended to Sri Lanka as from the initiation of the investigation, it would have not withdrawn its request for exemption.
Druga družba iz Šrilanke je trdila, da ne bi umaknila svojega zahtevka za izvzetje, če bi vedela, da lahko za izvoz iz Šrilanke v Unijo velja protidampinška dajatev, kakor je bila razširjena na Šrilanko od začetka preiskave.
However, it is underlined that, at the time of the withdrawal of its request for exemption, the company is considered aware of the possible application of the anti-dumping duty as extended as from the date of the registration of imports from Sri Lanka to the Union, i.e. the initiation of the anti-circumvention investigation.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da se za družbo v času njenega umika zahtevka za izvzetje šteje, da je bila seznanjena z morebitno uporabo protidampinške dajatve, kakor je bila razširjena od datuma registracije uvoza iz Šrilanke v Unijo, tj. od začetka preiskave proti izogibanju.
The company has been informed of this consequence in three instances, through recital 20 of the initiating Regulation, during a hearing at the beginning of the investigation and during the on-spot visit.
Družba je bila o tej posledici obveščena trikrat, in sicer v uvodni izjavi 20 uredbe o začetku preiskave, med zaslišanjem na začetku preiskave in med obiskom na kraju samem.
Another company from Sri Lanka submitted new information that it should have submitted before the verification visit and due to the advanced stage of the investigation that information could not be verified anymore.
Druga družba iz Šrilanke je predložila nove informacije, ki bi jih morala predložiti pred preveritvenim obiskom in jih zaradi zaključne faze preiskave ni bilo več mogoče preveriti.
Furthermore, the company argued that it had submitted all the information required.
Poleg tega je družba trdila, da je predložila vse zahtevane informacije.
As mentioned in recitals 39 and 40 the company did not submit all the information requested in order to be verified on-spot.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 39 in 40, družba ni predložila vseh zahtevanih informacij za preverjanje na kraju samem.
In particular, the purchase value of parts of local origin as reported by the company was found unreliable.
Zlasti se je ugotovilo, da je vrednost nakupa delov lokalnega porekla po navedbah družbe nezanesljiva.
As a result, the compliance with the criteria set out in Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation could not have been determined.
Zato skladnosti z merili iz člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče potrditi.
In addition, the company claimed irregularities concerning the on-spot visit in respect of its length and language issues.
Poleg tega je družba trdila, da je pri obisku na kraju samem prišlo do nepravilnosti, in sicer v zvezi z njegovo dolžino in jezikovnimi težavami.
In this regard, it should be noted that the company was recently set up and therefore only one day of verification was scheduled.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bila družba ustanovljena pred kratkim, zato je bil za preverjanje načrtovan le en dan.
The verification was carried out during a full working day.
Preverjanje se je izvedlo v enem delovnem dnevu.
At the end of the verification, the company did not ask to submit any additional information that was not able to provide during the verification.
Na koncu preverjanja družba ni zaprosila za možnost, da predloži morebitne dodatne informacije, ki jih med preverjanjem ni mogla zagotoviti.
Furthermore, before the on-spot verification the company was informed that the verification will be carried out in English and the party has not raised any objections.
Poleg tega je bila družba pred preverjanjem na kraju samem obveščena, da bo preverjanje izvedeno v angleškem jeziku, čemur ni ugovarjala.
Moreover, the Commission was accompanied by an interpreter during the on-spot verification to facilitate language communication problems, if any.
Komisijo je med preverjanjem na kraju samem za pomoč pri morebitnih jezikovnih težavah v komunikaciji spremljal tudi tolmač.
In addition, it is highlighted that most of the documents submitted by the company during the verification visit were actually in English, including the accounting related documents.
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da je družba med preveritvenim obiskom večino dokumentov predložila v angleškem jeziku, vključno z dokumenti v zvezi z vodenjem računov.
In view of the above, all the claims of the company are rejected,
Glede na navedeno se vse trditve družbe zavrnejo –
In light of the purpose of this Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to ‘all other companies’ imposed by Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 on imports of bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised, originating in the People’s Republic of China, is hereby extended to imports of bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised, consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not, currently falling within CN codes ex87120030 and ex87120070 (TARIC code 8712003010 and 8712007091) with the exception of those produced by the companies listed below:
Glede na namen te uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“, uvedena s členom 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 990/2011 na uvoz dvokoles in drugih podobnih koles (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli, a brez enokolesnikov), brez motornega pogona, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, razširi na uvoz dvokoles in drugih podobnih koles (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli, a brez enokolesnikov), brez motornega pogona, poslanih iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije ali ne, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN 87120030 in ex87120070 (oznaki TARIC 8712003010 in 8712007091), razen tistih, ki so jih proizvedle spodaj navedene družbe:
Insera Sena, 393 Jawa Street, Buduran, Sidoarjo 61252, Indonesia
Insera Sena, 393 Jawa Street, Buduran, Sidoarjo 61252, Indonezija
20, Driyorejo, Gresik 61177, Jawa Timur Indonesia
20, Driyorejo, Gresik 61177, Jawa Timur, Indonezija
Anggrek Neli Murni 114 Slipi, 11480, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
Anggrek Neli Murni 114 Slipi, 11480, Jakarta Barat, Indonezija
Asiabike Industrial Limited, No 114, Galle Road, Henamulla, Panadura, Sri Lanka
Asiabike Industrial Limited, No 114, Galle Road, Henamulla, Panadura, Šrilanka B768
BSH Ventures (Private) Limited, No 84, Campbell Place, Colombo-10, Sri Lanka
84, Campbell Place, Colombo-10, Šrilanka
Samson Bikes (Pvt) Ltd, No 110, Kumaran Rathnam Road, Colombo 02, Sri Lanka
Samson Bikes (Pvt) Ltd., No 110, Kumaran Rathnam Road, Colombo 02, Šrilanka
euro Cycles SA, Zone Industrielle Kelaa Kebira, 4060, Sousse, Tunisia
Euro Cycles SA, Zone Industrielle Kelaa Kebira, 4060, Sousse, Tunizija
The application of exemptions granted to the companies specifically mentioned in paragraph 1 of this Article or authorised by the Commission in accordance with Article 2(2) of this Regulation shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Uporaba izvzetij, ki jih Komisija odobri v skladu s členom 2(2) te uredbe, je za družbe, poimensko navedene v odstavku 1 tega člena, pogojena s predložitvijo veljavnega trgovinskega računa, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge k tej uredbi, carinskim organom držav članic.
The duty extended by paragraph 1 of this Article shall be collected on imports consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia or not, registered in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 875/2012 and Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 with the exception of those produced by the companies listed in paragraph 1.
Dajatev, razširjena z odstavkom 1 tega člena, se pobira za uvoz, poslan iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije ali ne, registriran v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 875/2012 ter členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009, razen za uvoz, ki ga proizvedejo družbe iz odstavka 1.
Requests for exemption from the duty extended by Article 1 shall be made in writing in one of the official languages of the European Union and must be signed by a person authorised to represent the entity requesting the exemption.
Zahtevki za izvzetje iz dajatve, razširjene s členom 1, se predložijo v pisni obliki v enem od uradnih jezikov Evropske unije, podpiše pa jih oseba, pooblaščena za zastopanje družbe, ki je zahtevala izvzetje.
In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 the Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, may authorise, by decision, the exemption of imports from companies which do not circumvent the anti-dumping measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011, from the duty extended by Article 1 of this Regulation.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom s sklepom odobri izvzetje iz dajatve, razširjene s členom 1 te uredbe, za uvoz družb, ki se ne izogibajo protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo (EU) št. 990/2011.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 875/2012.
Carinskim organom se odredi, da ustavijo registracijo uvoza, ki je bila določena v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 875/2012.
OJ C 122, 27.4.2012, p. 9.
UL L 188, 18.7.2009, str. 93.
OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.
UL C 122, 27.4.2012, str. 9.
OJ L 136, 23.5.2013, p. 15.
UL L 136, 23.5.2013, str. 15.
See also previous cases, e.g. recital 48 of Council Regulation (EC) No 388/2008 (OJ L 117, 1.5.2008, p. 1).
Glej tudi prejšnje primere, npr. uvodno izjavo 48 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 388/2008 (UL L 117, 1.5.2008, str. 1).
A declaration signed by an official of the entity issuing the commercial invoice, in the following format, must appear on the valid commercial invoice referred to in Article 1(2):
Izjava, ki jo podpiše odgovorna oseba subjekta, ki je izdal trgovinski račun, mora biti na veljavnem trgovinskem računu iz člena 1(2) v naslednji obliki:
The name and function of the official of the entity issuing the commercial invoice;
1. ime in položaj odgovorne osebe subjekta, ki je izdal trgovinski račun;
The following declaration: ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (volume) of (product concerned) sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in (country concerned). I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct’;
2. naslednja izjava: „Podpisani potrjujem, da je (količino) (zadevni izdelek), prodanega za izvoz v Evropsko unijo, ki jo zajema ta račun, proizvedla (ime in naslov družbe) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) v (zadevna država). Izjavljam, da so podatki v tem računu popolni in resnični.“;
Date and signature.
3. datum in podpis.
Data were collected for the IP to investigate, inter alia, the alleged change in the pattern of trade following the increase of the anti-dumping duty in 2005.
Za OP so se med drugim zbirali podatki za preiskavo domnevne spremembe vzorca trgovanja po povečanju protidampinške dajatve leta 2005.
More detailed data were collected for the reporting period from 1 September 2011 to 31 August 2012 (‘the RP’) in order to examine the possible undermining of the remedial effect of the measures in force and existence of dumping.
Za obdobje od 1. septembra 2011 do 31. avgusta 2012 („obdobje poročanja“) so se zbrali podrobnejši podatki, da bi se preverila morebitna oslabitev popravljalnega učinka veljavnih ukrepov in obstoj dampinga.
At the same time, imports of the product under investigation from Indonesia into the Union increased from 2005 onwards and more than doubled in 2006 as compared to 2004.
Hkrati se je uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz Indonezije v Unijo od leta 2005 povečal in se je leta 2006 v primerjavi z letom 2004 več kot podvojil.
Imports continued increasing, with the exception of 2009, albeit remaining at levels well above those of 2004.
Uvoz se je še naprej povečeval, razen leta 2009, čeprav je bil takrat še vedno na precej višji ravni kot leta 2004.
Since 2009, imports increased again continuously up to the RP.
Od leta 2009 do obdobja poročanja se je uvoz spet stalno povečeval.
As concerns the imports of the product under investigation from Malaysia into the Union, they were negligible before the increase of the anti-dumping duty in July 2005.
Uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz Malezije v Unijo je bil pred povečanjem protidampinške dajatve julija 2005 zanemarljiv.
In 2005, they increased significantly (more than two hundred fold) but decreased in 2009 by 46 %, followed by another increase of 38 % in 2010.
Leta 2005 se je znatno povečal (za več kot dvestokrat), vendar se je leta 2009 zmanjšal za 46 %, leta 2010 pa se je spet povečal za 38 %.
The imports of the product under investigation from Sri Lanka into the Union increased significantly after the increase of the anti-dumping duties in 2005 and continued increasing in the following years by almost 500 % reaching a peak in 2010.
Uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz Šrilanke v Unijo se je po povečanju protidampinških dajatev leta 2005 znatno povečal in se je v naslednjih letih še naprej povečeval, in sicer za skoraj 500 %, najvišji pa je bil leta 2010.
In 2011 and during the RP the imports from Sri Lanka of the product under investigation decreased, albeit still exceeding by far the import levels from 2004 before the increase of the anti-dumping measures, i.e. overall imports from Sri Lanka increased by 282 % between 2004 and the RP.
Leta 2011 in v obdobju poročanja se je uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz Šrilanke zmanjšal, čeprav je še vedno precej presegal stopnjo uvoza iz leta 2004 pred zaostritvijo protidampinških ukrepov, tj. uvoz iz Šrilanke se je med letom 2004 in obdobjem poročanja skupaj povečal za 282 %.
Finally, imports of the product concerned from Tunisia into the Union increased by almost 30 % in 2005, i.e. after the increase of the anti-dumping duties, and by more than 20 % in 2006.
Uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz Tunizije v Unijo se je leta 2005, tj. po povečanju protidampinških dajatev, povečal za skoraj 30 %, leta 2006 pa za več kot 20 %.
They more than doubled between 2006 and 2007 reaching a peak in 2007.
Med letoma 2006 in 2007 se je več kot podvojil, največji pa je bil leta 2007.
Between 2008 and the RP, imports continued increasing with the exception of 2009.
Med letom 2008 in obdobjem poročanja se je uvoz še naprej povečeval, z izjemo leta 2009.
During the IP exports from the PRC to Indonesia increased in total by 83,8 %.
V OP se je izvoz iz LRK v Indonezijo povečal za skupno 83,8 %.
Exports of bicycles from the PRC to Malaysia increased in 2005, after the increase of the anti-dumping measures, by almost 30 % and continued increasing until they reached a peak in 2011, i.e. an increase of 110,8 % as compared to 2004.
Izvoz koles iz LRK v Malezijo se je leta 2005, po zaostritvi protidampinških ukrepov, povečal za skoraj 30 % in se še naprej povečeval ter leta 2011 dosegel vrh, tj. povečanje za 110,8 % v primerjavi z letom 2004.
In the RP the exports from the PRC to Malaysia, decreased slightly, but remained at levels largely exceeding those of 2004.
V obdobju poročanja se je izvoz iz LRK v Malezijo nekoliko zmanjšal, vendar je njegova raven še vedno precej presegala raven iz leta 2004.
Overall, Chinese exports to Malaysia increased by 99,6 % during the IP.
Skupno se je kitajski izvoz v Malezijo v OP povečal za 99,6 %
Exports of bicycles from the PRC to Sri Lanka also increased following the increase of the anti-dumping duties in July 2005.
Izvoz koles iz LRK v Šrilanko se je po zaostritvi protidampinških ukrepov julija 2005 prav tako povečal.
They slightly decreased in 2007 but more than doubled in 2010 and 2011 as compared to 2004.
Nekoliko se je zmanjšal leta 2007, v letih 2010 in 2011 pa se je v primerjavi z letom 2004 več kot podvojil.
Overall, Chinese exports to Sri Lanka increased by 132,5 % during the IP.
Skupno se je kitajski izvoz v Šrilanko v OP povečal za 132,5 %.
Although exports from the PRC to Tunisia decreased and remained at lower levels after 2008 they still remained at much higher levels than during 2004.
Čeprav se je izvoz iz LRK v Tunizijo po letu 2008 zmanjšal in ostal na nižji ravni, je bila njegova raven še vedno precej višja kot leta 2004.
Overall, Chinese exports to Tunisia increased from 2534 bicycles in 2004 to 170772 bicycles in the RP.
Skupno se je kitajski izvoz v Tunizijo v obdobju poročanja povečal z 2534 koles leta 2004 na 170772 koles.
Concerning Malaysia, the sole Malaysian company that cooperated started to produce and export bicycles in 2010.
Edina malezijska družba, ki je sodelovala, je začela proizvajati in izvažati kolesa leta 2010.
As no other company cooperated, no information could be obtained on the possible levels of the genuine production of the product under investigation in this country.
Ker ni sodelovala nobena druga družba, ni bilo mogoče pridobiti podatkov o možni ravni dejanske proizvodnje izdelka v preiskavi v tej državi.
This company started to produce and export to the Union the product concerned only at the end of 2011.
Ta družba je začela proizvajati zadevni izdelek in ga izvažati v Unijo šele konec leta 2011.
No transhipment practices were found with regard to this company.
Pri tej družbi prakse pretovarjanja niso bile ugotovljene.
In addition, the reported values of purchased parts in 2011 corresponded to the value of consumed parts reported in the annual report of the company for 2011.
Poleg tega so predložene vrednosti kupljenih delov leta 2011 ustrezale vrednosti porabljenih delov iz letnega poročila družbe za leto 2011.
The figures concerning purchased and consumed parts reported for RP and 2010 were accepted as declared by the company.
Predloženi podatki o kupljenih in porabljenih delih za obdobje poročanja in za leto 2010 so bili sprejeti, kot jih je navedla družba.
Council Regulation (EU) No 502/2013
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 502/2013
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China following an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 990/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 9(4) and 11(3), (5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 9(4) ter člena 11(3), (5) in (6) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 30,6 % on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or ‘the country concerned’) (the ‘original investigation’).
Svet je z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2474/93 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 30,6 % na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“) („prvotna preiskava“).
Following an anti-circumvention investigation in accordance with Article 13 of the basic Regulation, this duty was extended by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 [3] to imports of certain bicycles parts originating in the PRC.
Po preiskavi proti izogibanju se je v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe ta dajatev z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 71/97 [3] razširila na uvoz določenih delov za kolesa s poreklom iz LRK.
In addition, it was decided to create an ‘exemption scheme’ on the basis of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je bilo odločeno, da se na podlagi člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe vzpostavi „shema oprostitev“.
In order to receive an exemption from the extended duty, bicycle producers in the Union have to respect the conditions of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation, namely to respect a ratio of less than 60 % of Chinese bicycle parts in their operation or the addition of more than 25 % value to all parts brought into the operation.
Za oprostitev plačila razširjene dajatve morajo proizvajalci koles v Uniji spoštovati pogoje člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe, in sicer zagotoviti največ 60 % delov za kolesa iz LRK pri sestavljanju koles ali dodano vrednost, ki je višja od 25 % za vse dele, vključene v proizvodnjo.
To date, more than 250 exemptions have been granted.
Do zdaj je bilo odobrenih več kot 250 oprostitev.
Following an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (‘amending interim review’), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 [6], decided to increase the anti-dumping duty in force to 48,5 %.
Po vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („vmesni pregled, ki spreminja stopnjo dajatve“) je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1095/2005 [6] sklenil, da je treba veljavno protidampinško dajatev povečati na 48,5 %.
Following a review of the anti-circumvention measures pursuant to Article 13(4) and 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 171/2008 [7], decided to maintain the extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles originating in the PRC to imports of certain bicycles parts from the PRC.
Po pregledu ukrepov proti izogibanju v skladu s členom 13(4) in členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 171/2008 [7] sklenil ohraniti razširitev protidampinške dajatve, uvedene na uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK na uvoz nekaterih delov za kolesa iz LRK.
Following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 990/2011 [8] (the ‘previous investigation’), decided that the abovementioned measures should be maintained.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Svet z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 990/2011 [8] („prejšnja preiskava“) sklenil, da je treba navedene ukrepe ohraniti.