natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Second argument: Significance of the trader’s activities and functions concerning products sourced from non-related companies.
Druga trditev: pomen dejavnosti in funkcij trgovca v zvezi s proizvodi, ki jih dobavlja od nepovezanih družb.
PTMM claimed that, whereas it did not deny that its related trader was involved in a range of different palm oil-based products, PTMM claimed that this argument was flawed, since it was based on activities beyond the scope of original investigation.
Družba PTMM sicer ni nasprotovala trditvi, da je njen povezani trgovec povezan z vrsto različnih proizvodov na osnovi palmovega olja, vendar je navedla, da je ta trditev pomanjkljiva, ker je temeljila na dejavnostih zunaj obsega prvotne preiskave.
In order to assess whether the functions of a trader are not those of an internal sales department but comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis within the meaning of the judgement of the General Court in Case T-249/06, the trader’s activities have to be assessed against the economic reality.
Da bi ocenili, ali so funkcije trgovca drugačne od funkcij notranje prodajne enote in primerljive s funkcijami zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizij v smislu sodbe Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-249/06, je treba dejavnosti trgovca oceniti ob upoštevanju dejanskih gospodarskih razmer.
There are similarities as regards the functions of the trader with regard to the product concerned and the other products traded.
Obstajajo podobnosti glede funkcije trgovca v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in drugimi proizvodi, s katerimi se trguje.
This is confirmed by the fact that, as discussed below in recitals 30 and 31, the relationship between PTMM and its related trader, including the functions of the latter, for most if not all products — including the product concerned — is governed by one single contract without distinguishing among products.
To potrjuje dejstvo, kot je obrazloženo v uvodnih izjavah 30 in 31, da je razmerje med družbo PTMM in njenim povezanim trgovcem, vključno z njegovimi funkcijami, za večino, če ne kar za vse izdelke, vključno z zadevnim izdelkom, urejeno z eno samo pogodbo brez razlikovanja med izdelki.
It should be noted that the trader’s overall activities were based to a significant extent on supplies originating from unrelated companies.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da so skupne dejavnosti trgovca temeljile v veliki meri na dobavi od nepovezanih družb.
The trader’s functions are therefore similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Zato so funkcije trgovca podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
Third argument: The existence of a contract between the trader and producer, which provided that the trader was to receive a commission for the export sales.
Tretja trditev: obstoj pogodbe med trgovcem in proizvajalcem, ki je določala, da trgovec dobi provizijo za izvoz.
PTMM claimed that this contract was a master agreement to regulate transfer prices between related parties to comply with applicable Indonesian/Singapore tax guidelines and internationally accepted guidelines on transfer pricing.
Družba PTMM je trdila, da je bila ta pogodba okvirna pogodba za urejanje transfernih cen med povezanimi stranmi za uskladitev z mednarodno priznanimi indonezijskimi/singapurskimi davčnimi smernicami in mednarodno sprejetimi smernicami za transferne cene.
The fact that this agreement can also be used for calculating arm’s length prices in accordance with applicable tax guidelines does not contradict the finding that pursuant to the agreement the trader received a commission in the form of a fixed mark-up only for its international and marketing sales activities.
Dejstvo, da se ta pogodba lahko uporabi tudi za izračunavanje tržne cene med neodvisnimi strankami v skladu z veljavnimi davčnimi smernicami ne nasprotuje ugotovitvi, da je trgovec v skladu s pogodbo prejel provizijo v obliki fiksnega pribitka samo za svoje mednarodne dejavnosti ter dejavnosti trženja in prodaje.
Indeed, the very name and the modalities of the agreement justify the finding that the contract was intended to govern the relationship between PTMM and the trader and was not limited to the transfer pricing or tax issues.
Dejansko že sam naslov in pogoji pogodbe utemeljujejo ugotovitev, da je bila pogodba namenjena urejanju razmerja med družbo PTMM in trgovcem, ter ni bila omejena na transferne cene ali davčna vprašanja.
The contract thus represents circumstantial evidence that the trader’s functions are similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Pogodba je tako posredni dokaz, da so funkcije trgovca podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
In the light of the arguments presented above the Institutions have met the standard of proof required by the settled case-law [7]: they based their findings on direct or at least circumstantial evidence.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih trditev so institucije izpolnile dokazni standard, ki se zahteva z ustaljeno sodno prakso [7]: njihove ugotovitve temeljijo na neposrednih ali vsaj posrednih dokazih.
As regards PTMM, and for reasons explained above, the adjustment made to the export prices pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation is warranted and the present level of anti-dumping duty should therefore be kept.
Kar zadeva družbo PTMM in iz zgoraj pojasnjenih razlogov je prilagoditev, izvedena za izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe, utemeljena, zato bi bilo treba sedanjo stopnjo protidampinške dajatve ohraniti.
C. CONCLUSION
C. SKLEP
On the basis of the above the duty rates applicable to Ecogreen and to all other companies in Indonesia (except P.T. Musim Mas) should be amended.
Na podlagi navedenega bi bilo treba stopnje dajatve, ki se uporabljajo za skupino Ecogreen in za vse druge družbe v Indoneziji (razen za družbo P.T. Musim Mas), spremeniti.
Repayment or remission should be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with applicable customs legislation,
Povračilo ali odpustitev dajatev bi bilo treba zahtevati pri nacionalnih carinskih organih v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo –
The entry for Indonesia in the table in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 is replaced by the following:
Vnos za Indonezijo v razpredelnici iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1138/2011 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The amounts of duties paid or entered into the accounts, pursuant to Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 in its initial version and the amounts of provisional duties definitively collected pursuant to Article 2 of the same Regulation in its initial version, which exceed those established by Article 1 of this Regulation, shall be repaid or remitted.
Zneski dajatev, ki so bili plačani ali vknjiženi v skladu s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1138/2011 v prvotni različici, in zneski dokončno pobranih začasnih dajatev v skladu s členom 2 iste uredbe v prvotni različici, ki presegajo tiste, ki jih določa člen 1 te uredbe, se povrnejo ali odpustijo.
It shall apply from 12 November 2011.
Uporablja se od 12. novembra 2011.
OJ L 293, 11.11.2011, p. 1.
UL L 293, 11.11.2011, str. 1.
Council Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 of 27 June 2006 imposing definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine, repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2320/97 and (EC) No 348/2000, terminating the interim and expiry reviews of the anti-dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel originating, inter alia, in Russia and Romania and terminating the interim reviews of the anti-dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel originating, inter alia, in Russia and Romania and in Croatia and Ukraine (OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 4).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 954/2006 z dne 27. junija 2006 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Hrvaške, Romunije, Rusije in Ukrajine, o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (ES) št. 2320/97 in (ES) št. 348/2000, o zaključku vmesnih pregledov in pregledov zaradi izteka protidampinških dajatev na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije in Romunije ter o zaključku vmesnih pregledov protidampinških dajatev na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije in Romunije ter Hrvaške in Ukrajine (UL L 175, 29.6.2006, str. 4).
Case C-248/04, Koninklijke Cooperatie Cosun [2006] ECR I-10211, paragraph 72, and Case C-303/05 Advocaten voor de Wereld [2007] ECR I-3633, paragraph 56.
Sodba z dne 26. oktobra 2006 v zadevi C-248/04, Koninklijke Coöperatie Cosun, ZOdl., str. I-10211, točka 72, in sodba z dne 3. maja 2007 v zadevi C-303/05 Advocaten voor de Wereld, Zodl., str. I-3633, točka 56.
Case C-372/06 Asda Stores Ltd v Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2007] ECR I-11223, point 62.
Sodba z dne 13. decembra 2007 v zadevi C-372/06 Asda Stores Ltd proti Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, ZOdl., str. I-11223, točka 62.
T-249/06, paragraphs 180 and 181.
Zadeva T-249/06, točki 180 in 181.
The amended rates should apply retroactively from the date of the entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 including to any imports subject to provisional duties between 12 May and 11 November 2011.
Spremenjene stopnje bi bilo treba uporabljati retroaktivno od začetka veljavnosti Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1138/2011, vključno z vsem uvozom, za katerega so med 12. majem 2011 in 11. novembrom 2011 veljale začasne dajatve.
Consequently, the definitive anti-dumping duty paid or entered into the accounts pursuant to Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 in its initial version and the provisional anti-dumping duties definitively collected pursuant to Article 2 of the same Regulation in its initial version in excess of the duty rate specified in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 as amended by this Regulation should be repaid or remitted.
Zato bi bilo treba dokončne protidampinške dajatve, plačane ali vknjižene v skladu s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1138/2011 v prvotni različici, in začasne protidampinške dajatve, dokončno pobrane v skladu s členom 2 iste uredbe v prvotni različici, ki presegajo stopnjo dajatve iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1138/2011, kakor je spremenjena s to uredbo, povrniti ali odpustiti.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1242/2012
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1242/2012
fixing for the 2013 fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000
o določitvi priporočenih cen in proizvodnih cen za Unijo za nekatere ribiške proizvode za ribolovno leto 2013 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 104/2000
Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products [1] requires that guide prices and Union producer prices for each fishing year be fixed in order to determine price levels for intervention on the market for certain fisheries products.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 104/2000 z dne 17. decembra 1999 o skupni ureditvi trgov za ribiške proizvode in proizvode ribogojstva [1] zahteva določitev priporočenih cen in proizvodnih cen za Unijo za vsako ribolovno leto, da se določijo ravni cen za intervencije na trgu za nekatere ribiške proizvode.
It is incumbent upon the Council to fix the guide prices for each of the products and groups of products listed in Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, and the Union producer prices for the products listed in Annex III to that Regulation.
Svet ima za dolžnost določiti priporočene cene za vsakega od proizvodov in za skupine proizvodov iz prilog I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 104/2000 ter proizvodne cene za Unijo za proizvode iz Priloge III k navedeni uredbi.
On the basis of the data currently available on the prices for the products concerned and the criteria laid down in Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, the guide prices should be increased, maintained or reduced for the 2013 fishing year depending on the species.
Na podlagi trenutno dosegljivih podatkov o cenah zadevnih proizvodov in meril iz člena 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000 bi bilo treba priporočene cene za ribolovno leto 2013 povišati, ohraniti ali znižati glede na posamezne vrste.
On the basis of the criteria laid down in the first and second indents of Article 18(2) and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, the Union producer price for the 2013 fishing year should be fixed,
Na podlagi meril, opredeljenih v prvi in drugi alinei člena 18(2), in v skladu s postopkom iz člena 26(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000 bi bilo treba prilagoditi proizvodno ceno za Unijo za ribolovno leto 2013 –
For the fishing year from 1 January to 31 December 2013, the guide prices as provided for in Article 18(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be as set out in Annex I to this Regulation.
Za ribolovno leto od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2013 se priporočene cene iz člena 18(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000 določijo v skladu s Prilogo I k tej uredbi.
For the fishing year from 1 January to 31 December 2013, the Union producer prices as provided for in Article 26(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be as set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Za ribolovno leto od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2013 se proizvodne cene za Unijo iz člena 26(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000 določijo v skladu s Prilogo II k tej uredbi.
Commercial presentation
Prodajne označbe
Whole fish or
cela riba ali
Gutted fish with head
riba brez drobovja z glavo
Fresh or chilled
sveža ali hlajena
Frozen, in original packages containing the same products
zamrznjena, v originalni embalaži, ki vsebuje enake proizvode
Council Regulation (EU) No 1243/2012
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1243/2012
amending Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 establishing a long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1342/2008 o določitvi dolgoročnega načrta za staleže trske in ribištvo, ki izkorišča te staleže
Council Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 [1] establishes a long-term plan for cod stocks in the Kattegat; the North Sea, the Skagerrak and the eastern Channel; the west of Scotland; and the Irish Sea, and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (‘the Cod Plan’).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1342/2008 [1] določa dolgoročni načrt za staleže trske v Kattegatu, Severnem morju, Skagerraku in vzhodnem Rokavskem prelivu, na zahodu Škotske in v Irskem morju ter ribištvo, ki izkorišča te staleže (v nadaljnjem besedilu: načrt za trsko).
The objective of the Cod Plan is to ensure the sustainable exploitation of those cod stocks on the basis of maximum sustainable yield.
Cilj načrta za trsko je zagotoviti trajnostno izkoriščanje navedenih staležev trske na podlagi največjega trajnostnega donosa.
This objective is to be attained while maintaining a specific level of fishing mortality of cod on appropriate age groups.
Cilj je treba doseči, hkrati pa ohraniti posebno raven smrtnosti trsk zaradi ribolova v ustreznih starostnih skupinah.
Articles 7, 8 and 9 and Article 12 of the Cod Plan contain, for the purpose of attaining the objective of the Cod Plan, specific rules prescribing a detailed methodology for the annual fixing of, on the one hand, total allowable catches (TACs) and, on the other hand, fishing effort limitations.
Za namene doseganja cilja načrta za trsko členi 7, 8 in 9 ter člen 12 načrta za trsko vsebujejo posebna pravila, ki predpisujejo podrobno metodologijo za letno določitev celotnega dovoljenega ulova in omejitev ribolovnega napora.
The scientific evaluation of the performance of the Cod Plan carried out by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) has shown a number of problems with the design and functioning of the Cod Plan.
Znanstvena ocena učinkovitosti načrta za trsko, ki jo je izvedel Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo (STECF), je razkrila številne težave z zasnovo in delovanjem načrta za trsko.
Without putting into question the objectives of the Cod Plan, the STECF concluded that those objectives are unlikely to be achieved within a time frame that would be in compliance with the conclusions of the World Summit on Sustainable Development held in Johannesburg in 2002 unless the flaws in the design of the Cod Plan, relating, inter alia, to the application of its Articles 9 and 12, are corrected.
STECF v cilje načrta za trsko ni podvomil, je pa ugotovil, da ti verjetno ne bodo doseženi v časovnem okviru, ki bi bil skladen s sklepi svetovnega vrha o trajnostnem razvoju, ki je bil leta 2002 v Johannesburgu, če ne bodo odpravljene pomanjkljivosti v zasnovi načrta za trsko, ki se med drugim nanašajo na uporabo členov 9 in 12 tega načrta.
Article 9 contains detailed rules for the fixing of the TACs in poor data conditions where the rules for the fixing of the TAC established in Articles 7 and 8 cannot be applied due to lack of sufficiently accurate and representative information.
V členu 9 so navedena podrobna pravila za določitev celotnega dovoljenega ulova v primeru nepopolnih podatkov, če se pravila za določitev celotnega dovoljenega ulova iz členov 7 in 8 ne morejo uporabljati zaradi pomanjkanja dovolj točnih in reprezentativnih informacij.
Although the application of the automatic yearly TAC reductions of 25 % had been intended to apply in exceptional circumstances only, from 2009 until 2012, it became the rule.
Čeprav je bila uporaba samodejnih letnih znižanj celotnega dovoljenega ulova za 25 % mišljena le v izjemnih okoliščinah, je v letih od 2009 do 2012 postala pravilo.
Consequently, since the entry into force of the Cod Plan, the TACs for the areas concerned have been reduced significantly and further automatic cuts would lead to the effective closure of the cod fisheries in the areas concerned.
Zato se je celotni dovoljeni ulov za zadevna območja od začetka veljavnosti načrta za trsko znatno zmanjšal, nadaljnja samodejna zmanjšanja pa bi vodila do dejanskega prenehanja ribolova trske na zadevnih območjih.
The scientific evaluation carried out by the STECF suggests that, for the purpose of attaining the objectives of the Cod Plan, it would be more appropriate in some cases to allow more flexibility to reflect the scientific advice on a case by case basis.
Znanstvena ocena, ki jo je opravil STECF, kaže, da bi bilo v nekaterih primerih za doseganje ciljev načrta za trsko primerneje omogočiti več prilagodljivosti, da se odrazi znanstveno mnenje od primera do primera.
As part of that flexibility, it is, therefore, appropriate to allow suspension, under certain conditions, of the annual reduction in the TAC or an alternative TAC level to be set, without jeopardising the objectives of the Cod Plan.
Zato je v sklopu takšne prilagodljivosti primerno, da se pod določenimi pogoji dopusti začasna opustitev letnega zmanjšanja celotnega dovoljenega ulova ali določitev alternativne ravni celotnega dovoljenega ulova, ne da bi to ogrozilo cilje načrta za trsko.
Article 12 contains detailed rules for the fixing of the allowable fishing effort.
V členu 12 so navedena podrobna pravila za določanje dovoljenega ribolovnega napora.
Given that the same percentage adjustments apply, in accordance with Article 12(4), to allowable fishing effort in line with the automatic annual reductions in fishing mortality (under Articles 7 and 8) and with the automatic annual reductions in the TAC (under Article 9), allowable fishing effort has been reduced by 25 % per year from 2009 to 2012 in the areas to which Article 9 has applied and significantly reduced in the areas to which Article 8 has applied.
Glede na to, da se za dovoljeni ribolovni napor na podlagi člena 12(4) uporabljajo enake odstotne prilagoditve v skladu s samodejnimi letnimi zmanjšanji smrtnosti zaradi ribolova (na podlagi členov 7 in 8) in samodejnimi letnimi znižanji celotnega dovoljenega ulova (na podlagi člena 9), se je dovoljeni ribolovni napor v obdobju od leta 2009 do 2012 zmanjšal za 25 % letno na območjih, za katere se je uporabljal člen 9, in znatno zmanjšal na območjih, za katere se je uporabljal člen 8.
Consequently, since the entry into force of the Cod Plan, allocations of the maximum allowable fishing effort have been significantly reduced for the main cod catching gears.
Zato so se dodelitve največjega dovoljenega ribolovnega napora za glavno orodje za ulov trske znatno zmanjšale po začetku veljavnosti načrta za trsko.
According to scientific advice, it cannot be demonstrated that such automatic annual reductions in the allowable fishing effort have lead to the expected reductions in fishing mortality.
Na podlagi znanstvenega mnenja ni mogoče dokazati, da so takšna samodejna letna zmanjšanja dovoljenega ribolovnega napora vodila do pričakovanih zmanjšanj smrtnosti zaradi ribolova.
In practice, the automatic annual effort reductions have also removed or reduced the incentives for fishermen to reduce fishing mortality by the other means foreseen in Article 13.
V praksi so samodejna letna znižanja napora tudi odpravila ali zmanjšala spodbude za ribiče za zmanjšanje smrtnosti zaradi ribolova z drugimi sredstvi iz člena 13.
The continued application of the automatic annual effort reductions would not lead to the achievement of the objectives of the Cod Plan, but would have a significant economic and social impact on the fleet segments that use the same gears, but that fish principally for species other than cod.
Nadaljnja uporaba samodejnega letnega znižanja napora ne bi pripomogla k doseganju ciljev načrta za trsko, temveč bi imela pomemben gospodarski in družbeni učinek na segmente flote, ki uporabljajo isto orodje, vendar večinoma za ribolov na druge vrste rib.
It is, therefore, appropriate to enable a more flexible approach that would allow suspension of the automatic annual reduction in the fishing effort, without jeopardising the objectives of the Cod Plan.
Zato je ustrezno, da se omogoči uporaba bolj prilagodljivega pristopa, s katerim bi lahko začasno ustavili samodejno letno znižanje ribolovnega napora, ne da bi s tem ogrozili doseganje ciljev načrta za trsko.
In view of the above, it is essential that Articles 9 and 12 of the Cod Plan be amended urgently so as to enable the new rules to apply for the purpose of the fixing of fishing opportunities for 2013.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je bistveno, da se člena 9 in 12 načrta za trsko spremenita po nujnem postopku, da bi se lahko nova pravila uporabljala za določanje ribolovnih možnosti za leto 2013.
Article 43(2) TFEU provides that the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, are to establish the common organisation of fisheries markets provided for in Article 40(1) thereof and the other provisions necessary for the pursuit of the objectives of the common fisheries policy.
V členu 43(2) PDEU je določeno, da Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku in po posvetovanju z Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom določita skupne ureditve ribiških trgov iz člena 40(1) PDEU in druge določbe, potrebne za doseganje ciljev skupne ribiške politike.
Article 43(3) TFEU provides that the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, is to adopt measures on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities.
V skladu s členom 43(3) PDEU Svet na predlog Komisije sprejme ukrepe o določitvi in dodelitvi ribolovnih možnosti.
Amendments to Articles 9 and 12 establish detailed specific rules for the purpose of fixing fishing opportunities expressed by means of the TAC and of fishing effort limitations.
S spremembama členov 9 in 12 se določijo podrobna specifična pravila za določanje ribolovnih možnosti, izraženih s celotnim dovoljenim ulovom in omejitvami ribolovnega napora.
They adapt the currently applicable rules for the fixing of fishing opportunities without amending the objective of the Cod Plan.
Z njima se prilagodijo trenutno veljavna pravila za določanje ribolovnih možnosti, ne da bi se s tem spremenil cilj načrta za trsko.