natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Directive should regulate all commercial transactions irrespective of whether they are carried out between private or public undertakings or between undertakings and public authorities, given that public authorities handle a considerable volume of payments to undertakings.
Ta direktiva bi morala urejati vse trgovinske posle, ne glede na to, ali potekajo med zasebnimi ali javnimi podjetji ali med podjetji in javnimi organi glede na to, da javni organi upravljajo z znatnim obsegom plačil podjetjem.
It should therefore also regulate all commercial transactions between main contractors and their suppliers and subcontractors.
Zato bi morala urejati tudi vse trgovinske posle med glavnimi izvajalci in njihovimi dobavitelji in podizvajalci.
The fact that the liberal professions are covered by this Directive should not oblige Member States to treat them as undertakings or merchants for purposes outside the scope of this Directive.
Dejstvo, da ta direktiva velja za svobodne poklice, države članice ne bi smelo zavezati k temu, da jih obravnavajo kot podjetja ali trgovce za namene, ki so izven področja uporabe te direktive.
The delivery of goods and the provision of services for remuneration to which this Directive applies should also include the design and execution of public works and building and civil engineering works.
Dostava blaga in izvajanje storitev za plačilo, za katera se uporablja ta direktiva, bi morala vključevati tudi projektiranje in izvedbo javnih del ter visokih in nizkih gradenj.
Late payment constitutes a breach of contract which has been made financially attractive to debtors in most Member States by low or no interest rates charged on late payments and/or slow procedures for redress.
Zamude pri plačilih predstavljajo kršenje pogodbe, kar je postalo finančno ugodno za dolžnike v večini držav članic zaradi nizkih ali neobstoječih obrestnih mer, ki se zaračunajo za zamude pri plačilih, in/ali dolgotrajnih postopkov pravnega varstva.
A decisive shift to a culture of prompt payment, including one in which the exclusion of the right to charge interest should always be considered to be a grossly unfair contractual term or practice, is necessary to reverse this trend and to discourage late payment.
Potreben je odločen premik h kulturi takojšnjega plačevanja, pri čemer bi bilo treba izključitev pravice do zaračunavanja obresti vedno obravnavati kot skrajno nepošten pogodbeni pogoj ali poslovno prakso, da bi preobrnili ta trend in odvračali od zamud pri plačilih.
Such a shift should also include the introduction of specific provisions on payment periods and on the compensation of creditors for the costs incurred, and, inter alia, that the exclusion of the right to compensation for recovery costs should be presumed to be grossly unfair.
Tak premik bi moral zajemati tudi uvedbo posebnih določb o plačilnih rokih in nadomestilih upnikom za nastale stroške ter med drugim domnevo, da je izključitev pravice do nadomestila za stroške izterjave skrajno nepoštena.
Accordingly, provision should be made for business-to-business contractual payment periods to be limited, as a general rule, to 60 calendar days.
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti določbe, ki pogodbene plačilne roke pri medpodjetniškem poslovanju praviloma omejujejo na 60 koledarskih dni.
However, there may be circumstances in which undertakings require more extensive payment periods, for example when undertakings wish to grant trade credit to their customers.
Vendar lahko obstajajo okoliščine, v katerih podjetja zahtevajo daljše plačilne roke, na primer, ko podjetja želijo svojim strankam odobriti komercialni kredit.
It should therefore remain possible for the parties to expressly agree on payment periods longer than 60 calendar days, provided, however, that such extension is not grossly unfair to the creditor.
Zato bi morale imeti stranke še naprej možnost, da se izrecno dogovorijo o plačilnih rokih, ki so daljši od 60 koledarskih dni, pod pogojem, da takšno podaljšanje ni skrajno nepošteno do upnika.
In the interest of consistency of Union legislation, the definition of ‘contracting authorities’ in Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors [9] and in Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public services contracts [10] should apply for the purposes of this Directive.
Zaradi doslednosti zakonodaje Unije bi bilo treba za namene te direktive uporabiti opredelitev pojma „naročniki“ iz Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev [9] in Direktive 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev [10].
Statutory interest due for late payment should be calculated on a daily basis as simple interest, in accordance with Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits [11].
Zakonske obresti za zamude pri plačilih bi bilo treba izračunati dnevno kot navadne obresti v skladu z Uredbo (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 Sveta z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in iztekov rokov [11].
This Directive should not oblige a creditor to claim interest for late payment.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela upnika zavezovati, da zahteva obresti za zamudo pri plačilu.
In the event of late payment, this Directive should allow a creditor to resort to charging interest for late payment without giving any prior notice of non-performance or other similar notice reminding the debtor of his obligation to pay.
V primeru zamude pri plačilu bi morala ta direktiva upniku omogočati, da zaračuna zamudne obresti brez kakršnega koli predhodnega obvestila o neizpolnitvi obveznosti ali drugega podobnega obvestila, v katerem dolžnika opozori na njegovo obveznost plačila.
A debtor’s payment should be regarded as late, for the purposes of entitlement to interest for late payment, where the creditor does not have the sum owed at his disposal on the due date provided that he has fulfilled his legal and contractual obligations.
Za namene upravičenja do zamudnih obresti bi bilo treba šteti, da je plačilo dolžnika v zamudi, če upnik, ki je izpolnil svoje pogodbene in zakonske obveznosti, ne prejme dolgovanega zneska do datuma zapadlosti.
Invoices trigger requests for payment and are important documents in the chain of transactions for the supply of goods and services, inter alia, for determining payment deadlines.
Računi pomenijo zahteve za plačilo in so pomembni dokumenti v verigi poslov za dobavo blaga in izvajanje storitev, med drugim za določitev plačilnih rokov.
For the purposes of this Directive, Member States should promote systems that give legal certainty as regards the exact date of receipt of invoices by the debtors, including in the field of e-invoicing where the receipt of invoices could generate electronic evidence and which is partly governed by the provisions on invoicing contained in Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax [12].
Države članice bi morale za namene te direktive spodbujati sisteme, ki zagotavljajo pravno varnost kar zadeva točen datum, na katerega dolžniki prejmejo račune, vključno s področjem izdajanja e-računov, kjer bi bila lahko pri prejemanju računov ustvarjena elektronska dokazila, kar deloma urejajo določbe o izdajanju računov, vsebovane v Direktivi Sveta 2006/112/ES z dne 28. novembra 2006 o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost [12].
Fair compensation of creditors for the recovery costs incurred due to late payment is necessary to discourage late payment.
Upnikom je treba zagotoviti pošteno nadomestilo za stroške izterjave, ki jih imajo zaradi zamud pri plačilih, da se odvrne od teh zamud.
Recovery costs should also include the recovery of administrative costs and compensation for internal costs incurred due to late payment for which this Directive should determine a fixed minimum sum which may be cumulated with interest for late payment.
Stroški izterjave bi morali vključevati izterjavo upravnih stroškov in nadomestilo za notranje stroške, ki so nastali zaradi zamude pri plačilu, za katere bi bilo treba v tej direktivi določiti fiksen minimalen znesek, ki se lahko izterja z obrestmi za zamudo pri plačilu.
Compensation in the form of a fixed sum should aim at limiting the administrative and internal costs linked to the recovery.
Nadomestilo v obliki fiksnega zneska bi moralo biti namenjeno omejevanju upravnih in notranjih stroškov, povezanih z izterjavo.
Compensation for the recovery costs should be determined without prejudice to national provisions according to which a national court may award compensation to the creditor for any additional damage regarding the debtor’s late payment.
Nadomestilo stroškov izterjave bi bilo treba določiti brez poseganja v nacionalne določbe, glede na katere lahko nacionalno sodišče dodeli upniku odškodnino za kakršno koli dodatno škodo v zvezi z dolžnikovo zamudo pri plačilu.
In addition to an entitlement to payment of a fixed sum to cover internal recovery costs, creditors should also be entitled to reimbursement of the other recovery costs they incur as a result of late payment by a debtor.
Upniki bi morali imeti poleg pravice do plačila fiksnega zneska za povračilo notranjih stroškov izterjave tudi pravico do povračila drugih stroškov izterjave, ki jih imajo kot posledica dolžnikove zamude pri plačilu.
Such costs should include, in particular, those incurred by creditors in instructing a lawyer or employing a debt collection agency.
Takšni stroški bi morali zlasti vključevati stroške, ki jih imajo upniki zaradi najema odvetnika ali agencije za izterjavo dolgov.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the right of Member States to provide for fixed sums for compensation of recovery costs which are higher and therefore more favourable to the creditor, or to increase those sums, inter alia, in order to keep pace with inflation.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v pravico držav članic, da določijo fiksne zneske nadomestila za stroške izterjave, ki so višji in zato ugodnejši za upnika, ali da te zneske povečajo, da bi med drugim dohajale inflacijo.
This Directive should not prevent payments by instalments or staggered payments.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela preprečevati plačil po obrokih ali plačil z zamikom.
However, each instalment or payment should be paid on the agreed terms and should be subject to the rules for late payment set out in this Directive.
Vendar bi moral biti vsak obrok ali plačilo opravljen v skladu z dogovorjenimi pogoji in predmet pravil glede zamud pri plačilih iz te direktive.
As a general rule, public authorities benefit from more secure, predictable and continuous revenue streams than undertakings.
Praviloma imajo javni organi varnejše, predvidljivejše in bolj stalne prilive prihodkov kot podjetja.
In addition, many public authorities can obtain financing at more attractive conditions than undertakings.
Poleg tega lahko mnogi javni organi pridobijo financiranje ob ugodnejših pogojih kot podjetja.
At the same time, public authorities depend less than undertakings on building stable commercial relationships for the achievement of their aims.
Hkrati so javni organi manj odvisni od stabilnih poslovnih odnosov za dosego svojih ciljev kot podjetja.
Long payment periods and late payment by public authorities for goods and services lead to unjustified costs for undertakings.
Dolgi plačilni roki in zamude pri plačilih javnih organov za blago in storitve vodijo do neupravičenih stroškov za podjetja.
It is therefore appropriate to introduce specific rules as regards commercial transactions for the supply of goods or services by undertakings to public authorities, which should provide in particular for payment periods normally not exceeding 30 calendar days, unless otherwise expressly agreed in the contract and provided it is objectively justified in the light of the particular nature or features of the contract, and in any event not exceeding 60 calendar days.
Zato je primerno uvesti posebna pravila za trgovinske posle dobavljanja blaga ali izvajanja storitev za javne organe s strani podjetij, zlasti glede plačilnih rokov, ki običajno ne bi smeli biti daljši od 30 koledarskih dni, razen če je v pogodbi izrecno dogovorjeno drugače in če je to objektivno utemeljeno glede na posebno naravo ali značilnosti pogodbe, v nobenem primeru pa ne bi smeli biti daljši od 60 koledarskih dni.
However, account should be taken of the specific situation of public authorities carrying out economic activities of an industrial or commercial nature by offering goods or services on the market as a public undertaking.
Vendar bi bilo treba upoštevati poseben položaj javnih organov, ki opravljajo gospodarske dejavnosti industrijske ali tržne narave s ponujanjem blaga ali storitev na trgu kot javna podjetja.
For that purpose, Member States should be allowed, under certain conditions, to extend the statutory payment period up to a maximum of 60 calendar days.
V ta namen bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da pod določenimi pogoji zakonski plačilni rok podaljšajo do največ 60 koledarskih dni.
A particular cause for concern in connection with late payment is the situation of health services in a large number of Member States.
V zvezi z zamudami pri plačilih je posebej zaskrbljujoč položaj zdravstvenih storitev v številnih državah članicah.
Healthcare systems, as a fundamental part of Europe’s social infrastructure, are often obliged to reconcile individual needs with the available finances, as the population of Europe ages, as expectations rise, and as medicine advances.
Zdravstveni sistemi kot temeljni del evropske socialne infrastrukture morajo posamezne potrebe pogosto usklajevati z razpoložljivimi finančnimi sredstvi, saj se evropsko prebivalstvo stara, pričakovanja rastejo, medicina pa napreduje.
All systems have to deal with the challenge of prioritising healthcare in a way that balances the needs of individual patients with the financial resources available.
Vsi sistemi se soočajo z izzivom izpostavljanja zdravstvenega varstva kot prioritete na način, ki bi zagotavljal ravnovesje med potrebami posameznih bolnikov in razpoložljivimi finančnimi sredstvi.
Member States should therefore be able to grant public entities providing healthcare a certain amount of flexibility in meeting their commitments.
Države članice bi morale zato imeti možnost, da osebam javnega prava, ki zagotavljajo zdravstveno varstvo, dajo več prožnosti pri izpolnjevanju njihovih obveznosti.
Member States should, nonetheless, make every effort to ensure that payments in the healthcare sector are made within the statutory payment periods.
Države članice bi si kljub temu morale po svojih najboljših močeh prizadevati zagotoviti, da se plačila v zdravstvenem sektorju opravijo v zakonskih plačilnih rokih.
In order not to jeopardise the achievement of the objective of this Directive, Member States should ensure that in commercial transactions the maximum duration of a procedure of acceptance or verification does not exceed, as a general rule, 30 calendar days.
Da izpolnjevanje cilja te direktive ne bi bilo ogroženo, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da pri trgovinskih poslih postopek sprejemanja ali preverjanja praviloma ne presega obdobja največ 30 koledarskih dni.
Nevertheless, it should be possible for a verification procedure to exceed 30 calendar days, for example in the case of particularly complex contracts, when expressly agreed in the contract and in any tender documents and if it is not grossly unfair to the creditor.
Kljub temu bi bilo treba omogočiti, da postopek preverjanja presega 30 dni, na primer pri posebej zapletenih pogodbah, če je to izrecno dogovorjeno v pogodbi in kakršni koli razpisni dokumentaciji ter ni skrajno nepošteno do upnika.
The Union institutions are in a situation comparable to that of the public authorities of Member States with regard to their financing and commercial relationships.
Institucije Unije so, kar zadeva njihovo financiranje in poslovne odnose, v položaju, ki ga lahko primerjamo s položajem javnih organov v državah članicah.
Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [13] specifies that the validation, authorisation and payment of expenditure by Union institutions must be completed within the time limits laid down in its implementing rules.
Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [13] določa, da morajo institucije Unije potrditev, odobritev in plačilo odhodkov izvesti v rokih, določenih v izvedbenih pravilih navedene uredbe.
Those implementing rules are currently set out in Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [14], and specify the circumstances in which creditors which are paid late are entitled to receive default interest.
Ta izvedbena pravila so določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [14], in posebej določajo okoliščine, v katerih so upniki, ki prejmejo plačilo z zamudo, upravičeni do zamudnih obresti.
In the context of the ongoing review of those Regulations, it should be ensured that the maximum time limits for payment by the Union institutions are aligned with statutory periods applicable to public authorities in accordance with this Directive.
V okviru pregleda teh uredb bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da so najdaljši plačilni roki za institucije Unije usklajeni z zakonskimi roki, ki v skladu s to direktivo veljajo za javne organe.
This Directive should prohibit abuse of freedom of contract to the disadvantage of the creditor.
Ta direktiva bi morala prepovedati zlorabo pogodbene svobode v škodo upnika.
As a result, where a term in a contract or a practice relating to the date or period for payment, the rate of interest for late payment or the compensation for recovery costs is not justified on the grounds of the terms granted to the debtor, or it mainly serves the purpose of procuring the debtor additional liquidity at the expense of the creditor, it may be regarded as constituting such an abuse.
Posledično pogodbeni pogoj ali praksa glede datuma ali roka plačila, obrestne mere za zamudo pri plačilu ali nadomestila stroškov izterjave, ki ni utemeljen s pogoji, ki veljajo za dolžnika, ali ne služi predvsem temu, da si dolžnik pridobi dodatno likvidnost na račun upnika, lahko šteje za tako zlorabo.
For that purpose, and in accordance with the academic ‘Draft Common Frame of Reference’, any contractual term or practice which grossly deviates from good commercial practice and is contrary to good faith and fair dealing should be regarded as unfair to the creditor.
Zaradi tega in v skladu z akademskim osnutkom skupnega referenčnega okvira bi se moral vsak pogodbeni pogoj ali praksa, ki močno odstopa od dobre trgovske prakse in je v nasprotju z dobro vero in pravičnim ravnanjem, šteti za nepoštenega do upnika.
In particular, the outright exclusion of the right to charge interest should always be considered as grossly unfair, whereas the exclusion of the right to compensation for recovery costs should be presumed to be grossly unfair.
Zlasti bi bilo treba popolno izključitev pravice do zaračunavanja obresti vedno obravnavati kot skrajno nepošteno, za izključitev pravice do nadomestila za stroške izterjave pa domnevati, da je skrajno nepoštena.
This Directive should not affect national provisions relating to the way contracts are concluded or regulating the validity of contractual terms which are unfair to the debtor.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na nacionalne določbe v zvezi z načinom sklepanja pogodb ali z veljavnostjo pogodbenih pogojev, ki so nepošteni do dolžnika.
In the context of enhanced efforts to prevent the abuse of freedom of contract to the detriment of creditors, organisations officially recognised as representing undertakings and organisations with a legitimate interest in representing undertakings should be able to take action before national courts or administrative bodies in order to prevent the continued use of contract terms or practices which are grossly unfair to the creditor.
V okviru okrepljenih prizadevanj za preprečevanje zlorab pogodbene svobode v škodo upnikov bi moralo biti organizacijam, ki podjetja uradno zastopajo, in organizacijam, ki imajo pravni interes zastopati podjetja, omogočeno, da vložijo tožbo pri nacionalnih sodiščih ali upravnih organih, da bi preprečili nadaljnjo uporabo pogodbenih pogojev ali praks, ki so skrajno nepošteni do upnika.
In order to contribute to the achievement of the objective of this Directive, Member States should foster the spread of good practices, including by encouraging the publication of a list of prompt payers.
Da bi prispevale k uresničitvi cilja te direktive, bi morale države članice spodbujati širitev dobrih praks, vključno s spodbujanjem objavljanja seznama hitrih plačnikov.
It is desirable to ensure that creditors are in a position to exercise a retention of title clause on a non-discriminatory basis throughout the Union, if the retention of title clause is valid under the applicable national provisions designated by private international law.
Zaželeno je, da se upnikom zagotovi tak položaj, da lahko na nediskriminatorni osnovi uveljavljajo določbo o pridržku lastninske pravice v celotni Uniji, če je klavzula o pridržku lastninske pravice veljavna glede na veljavne nacionalne določbe, ki jih določa mednarodno zasebno pravo.
This Directive only defines the term ‘enforceable title’ but should not regulate the various procedures for forced execution of such a title or the conditions under which forced execution of such a title can be stopped or suspended.
Ta direktiva samo opredeljuje izraz „izvršilni naslov“, ne bi pa smela urejati različnih postopkov prisilne izvršbe takega naslova ali pogojev, pod katerimi se prisilna izvršba takega naslova lahko ustavi ali zadrži.
The consequences of late payment can be dissuasive only if they are accompanied by procedures for redress which are rapid and effective for the creditor.
Posledice zamud pri plačilih so lahko odvračilne samo, če hkrati obstajajo postopki pravnega varstva, ki so hitri in učinkoviti za upnika.
In accordance with the principle of non-discrimination set out in Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, those procedures should be available to all creditors who are established in the Union.
V skladu z načelom nediskriminacije iz člena 18 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije bi morali taki postopki biti na voljo vsem upnikom s sedežem v Uniji.
In order to facilitate compliance with the provisions of this Directive, Member States should encourage recourse to mediation or other means of alternative dispute resolution.
Da bi se pripomoglo k skladnosti z določbami te direktive, bi morale države članice spodbujati uporabo mediacije ali drugih načinov alternativnega reševanja sporov.