natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The legal standards for the protection of personal data in the State of Israel are largely based on the standards set out in Directive 95/46/EC and are laid down in the Privacy Protection Act 5741-1981, lastly amended in 2007 in order to establish new processing requirements for personal data and the detailed organization of the supervisory authority.
Pravni standardi varstva osebnih podatkov v Državi Izrael temeljijo v glavnem na standardih iz Direktive 95/46/ES, določeni pa so v Zakonu o varstvu zasebnosti št. 5741 iz leta 1981, ki je bil nazadnje spremenjen leta 2007 z namenom določiti nove zahteve za obdelavo osebnih podatkov in podrobno organizacijo nadzornega organa.
That data protection legislation is further complemented by governmental decisions on the implementation of the Privacy Protection Act 5741-1981 and on the organisation and functioning of the supervisory authority, largely based upon recommendations formulated in the Report to the Ministry of Justice by the Committee for the Examination of Legislation relating to Databases (Schoffman Report).
Navedeno zakonodajo o varstvu podatkov nadalje dopolnjujejo vladni sklepi o izvajanju Zakona o varstvu zasebnosti št. 5741 iz leta 1981 ter o organizaciji in delovanju nadzornega organa, ki temeljijo predvsem na priporočilih, ki jih je v poročilu ministrstvu za pravosodje izrazil odbor za pregled zakonodaje v zvezi s podatkovnimi zbirkami (Schoffmanovo poročilo).
Data protection provisions are also contained in a number of legal instruments regulating different sectors, such as financial sector legislation, health regulations and public registries.
Določbe o varstvu podatkov prav tako vsebujejo številni pravni akti, ki urejajo različne sektorje, kot so zakonodaja o finančnem sektorju, zdravstvu in javnih registrih.
The legal data protection standards applicable in the State of Israel cover all the basic principles necessary for an adequate level of protection for natural persons in relation to the processing of personal data in automated databases.
Pravni standardi varstva podatkov, ki se uporabljajo v Državi Izrael, zajemajo vsa temeljna načela, potrebna za ustrezno raven varstva za fizične osebe v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov v avtomatiziranih podatkovnih zbirkah.
Chapter 2 of Privacy Protection Act 5741-1981, which lays down the principles for the processing of personal data, does not apply to the processing of personal data in non-automated databases (manual databases).
Poglavje 2 Zakona o varstvu zasebnosti št. 5741 iz leta 1981, v katerem so določena načela za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ne velja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov v neavtomatiziranih podatkovnih zbirkah (ročne podatkovne zbirke).
The application of the legal data protection standards is guaranteed by administrative and judicial remedies and by independent supervision carried out by the supervisory authority, the Israeli Law, Information and Technology Authority (ILITA), which is invested with powers of investigation and intervention, and which acts completely independently.
Uporaba pravnih standardov varstva podatkov je zagotovljena z upravnim in sodnim varstvom ter neodvisnim nadzorom, ki ga izvaja nadzorni organ, to je izraelski organ za zakonodajo, informacije in tehnologijo (ILITA), ki je pooblaščen za preiskavo in ukrepanje ter deluje popolnoma neodvisno.
Israeli data protection authorities have provided explanations and assurances as to how the Israeli law is to be interpreted, and have given assurances that the Israeli data protection legislation is implemented in accordance with such interpretation.
Izraelski organi za varstvo podatkov so priskrbeli razlage in zagotovila glede načina razlage izraelskih predpisov ter podali zagotovila, da se izraelska zakonodaja o varstvu podatkov izvaja v skladu s tako razlago.
This Decision takes account of these explanations and assurances, and is therefore conditional upon them.
Ta sklep upošteva te razlage in zagotovila ter je zato pogojen z njimi.
The State of Israel should therefore be regarded as providing an adequate level of protection for personal data as referred to in Directive 95/46/EC with regard to automated international transfers of personal data from the European Union to the State of Israel or, where those transfers are not automated, they are subject to further automated processing in the State of Israel.
Za Državo Izrael bi se torej moralo šteti, da zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov iz Direktive 95/46/ES v zvezi z avtomatiziranimi mednarodnimi prenosi osebnih podatkov iz Evropske unije v Državo Izrael ali neavtomatiziranimi prenosi, pri katerih se v Državi Izrael izvaja nadaljnja avtomatizirana obdelava.
Conversely, international transfers of personal data from the EU to the State of Israel whereby the transfer itself as well as the subsequent data processing is carried out exclusively through non-automated means should not be covered by this Decision.
Nasprotno pa ta sklep ne bi smel veljati za mednarodne prenose osebnih podatkov iz EU v Državo Izrael, pri katerih se tako prenos kot tudi poznejša obdelava podatkov izvajata izključno z neavtomatskimi sredstvi.
The adequacy findings pertaining to this Decision refer to the State of Israel, as defined in accordance with international law.
Ugotovitve o ustreznosti v zvezi s tem sklepom se nanašajo na Državo Izrael v skladu z opredelitvijo mednarodnega prava.
Further onward transfers to a recipient outside the State of Israel, as defined in accordance with international law, should be considered as transfers of personal data to a third country.
Nadaljnji prenosi prejemniku zunaj Države Izrael v skladu z opredelitvijo mednarodnega prava se štejejo za prenose osebnih podatkov tretji državi.
The Working Party on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data established under Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC has delivered a favourable opinion on the level of adequacy as regards protection of personal data in relation to automated international transfers of personal data from the European Union or, whether they are non-automated they are subject to further automated processing in the State of Israel.
Delovna skupina za varstvo posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov, ustanovljena na podlagi člena 29 Direktive 95/46/ES, je dala pozitivno mnenje o ravni ustreznosti glede varstva osebnih podatkov v zvezi z avtomatiziranimi mednarodnimi prenosi osebnih podatkov iz Evropske unije ali neavtomatiziranimi prenosi, pri katerih se v Državi Izrael izvaja nadaljnja avtomatizirana obdelava.
In its favourable opinion, the Working Party has encouraged the Israeli authorities to adopt further provisions which extend the application of Israeli legislation to manual databases, which expressly recognise the application of the proportionality principle to personal data processing in the private sector and which interpret the exemptions in international data transfers as in accordance with the criteria set out in its ‘Working document on a common interpretation of Article 26(1) of Directive 95/46/EC’ [2].
Delovna skupina je v svojem pozitivnem mnenju spodbudila izraelske organe k sprejetju dodatnih predpisov, ki bodo uporabo izraelske zakonodaje razširili na ročne podatkovne zbirke, uporabo načela sorazmernosti izrecno priznali pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v zasebnem sektorju in izjeme pri mednarodnih prenosih podatkov razlagali v skladu z merili iz Delovnega dokumenta o skupni razlagi člena 26(1) Direktive 95/46/ES [2].
This opinion has been taken into account in the preparation of this Decision [3].
To mnenje je bilo upoštevano pri pripravi tega sklepa [3].
The Committee established under Article 31(1) of Directive 95/46/EC did not deliver an opinion within the time limit laid down by its Chairman,
Odbor, ustanovljen na podlagi člena 31(1) Direktive 95/46/ES, ni predložil mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik –
For the purposes of Article 25(2) of Directive 95/46/EC, the State of Israel is considered as providing an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from the European Union in relation to automated international transfers of personal data from the European Union or, where they are not automated, they are subject to further automated processing in the State of Israel.
Za namene člena 25(2) Direktive 95/46/ES se šteje, da Država Izrael zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov, prenesenih iz Evropske unije, v zvezi z avtomatiziranimi mednarodnimi prenosi osebnih podatkov iz Evropske unije ali neavtomatiziranimi prenosi, pri katerih se v Državi Izrael izvaja nadaljnja avtomatizirana obdelava.
The competent supervisory authority of the State of Israel for the application of the legal data protection standards in the State of Israel is the ‘Israeli Law, Information and Technology Authority (ILITA)’, referred to in the Annex to this Decision.
Pristojni nadzorni organ za področje uporabe pravnih standardov varstva podatkov v Državi Izrael je „Israeli Law, Information and Technology Authority (ILITA)“ (izraelski organ za zakonodajo, informacije in tehnologijo), naveden v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
This Decision concerns only the adequacy of protection provided in the State of Israel, as defined in accordance with international law, with a view to meeting the requirements of Article 25(1) of Directive 95/46/EC and does not affect other conditions or restrictions implementing other provisions of that Directive that pertain to the processing of personal data within the Member States.
Ta sklep zadeva le ustreznost varstva, zagotovljenega v Državi Izrael v skladu z opredelitvijo mednarodnega prava z namenom izpolniti zahteve člena 25(1) Direktive 95/46/ES in ne vpliva na druge pogoje ali omejitve, s katerimi se izvajajo druge določbe navedene direktive, ki se nanašajo na obdelavo osebnih podatkov v državah članicah.
This Decision shall be applied in accordance with international law.
Ta sklep se uporablja v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.
It is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, under the terms of international law.
Ne vpliva na status Golanske planote, območja Gaze in Zahodnega brega, vključno z vzhodnim Jeruzalemom, v skladu z opredelitvijo mednarodnega prava.
Without prejudice to their powers to take action to ensure compliance with national provisions adopted pursuant to provisions other than Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC, the competent authorities in Member States may exercise their existing powers to suspend data flows to a recipient in the State of Israel in order to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in the following cases:
Brez vpliva na pooblastila za ukrepanje za zagotavljanje skladnosti z nacionalnimi predpisi, sprejetimi v skladu z določbami, razen s tistimi iz člena 25 Direktive 95/46/ES, lahko pristojni organi v državah članicah izvajajo svoja obstoječa pooblastila, da začasno ustavijo prenos podatkov prejemniku v Državi Izrael z namenom zavarovanja posameznikov v zvezi z obdelavo njihovih osebnih podatkov v naslednjih primerih:
where a competent Israeli authority has determined that the recipient is in breach of the applicable standards of protection; or
če pristojni izraelski organ ugotovi, da prejemnik krši veljavne standarde varstva; ali
where there is a substantial likelihood that the standards of protection are being infringed, there are reasonable grounds for believing that the competent Israeli authority is not taking or will not take adequate and timely steps to settle the case at issue, the continuing transfer would create an imminent risk of grave harm to data subjects and the competent authorities in the Member State have made reasonable efforts in the circumstances to provide the party responsible for processing established in the State of Israel with notice and an opportunity to respond.
če obstaja precejšnja verjetnost, da so standardi varstva kršeni, če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za prepričanje, da pristojni izraelski organ ne ukrepa ali ne bo ukrepal primerno in pravočasno, da bi rešil zadevno vprašanje, če bi neprekinjeni prenos povzročil neposredno tveganje hudega škodovanja osebam, na katere se podatki nanašajo, in če so si pristojni organi v državi članici v teh okoliščinah ustrezno prizadevali obvestiti organ s sedežem v Državi Izrael, pristojen za obdelavo, ter mu dati priložnost za odziv.
The suspension shall cease as soon as the standards of protection are assured and the competent authority of the Member States concerned is notified thereof.
Začasna ustavitev prenosa podatkov preneha takoj, ko so zagotovljeni standardi varstva in so o tem uradno obveščeni pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of cases where the action of bodies responsible for ensuring compliance with the standards of protection in the State of Israel fails to secure such compliance.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obvestijo o primerih, kadar ukrepi organov, odgovornih za zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardi varstva v Državi Izrael, ne zagotavljajo take skladnosti.
If the information collected under Article 3 and under paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article provides evidence that any body responsible for ensuring compliance with the standards of protection in the State of Israel is not effectively fulfilling its role, the Commission shall inform the competent Israeli authority and, if necessary, present draft measures in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 31(2) of Directive 95/46/EC with a view to repealing or suspending this Decision or limiting its scope.
Če informacije, zbrane v skladu s členom 3 ter odstavkoma 1 in 2 tega člena, dokazujejo, da organ, odgovoren za zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardi varstva v Državi Izrael, svoje vloge ne izpolnjuje učinkovito, Komisija obvesti pristojni izraelski organ in po potrebi predloži osnutke ukrepov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 31(2) Direktive 95/46/ES z namenom razveljavitve ali začasnega prenehanja izvajanja tega sklepa ali omejitve njegovega področja uporabe.
The Commission shall monitor the functioning of this Decision and report any pertinent findings to the Committee established under Article 31 of Directive 95/46/EC, including any evidence that could affect the finding in Article 1 of this Decision, that protection in the State of Israel is adequate within the meaning of Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC and any evidence that this Decision is being implemented in a discriminatory way.
Komisija spremlja učinkovanje tega sklepa in odboru, ustanovljenemu v skladu s členom 31 Direktive 95/46/ES, poroča o morebitnih zadevnih ugotovitvah, vključno s kakršnimi koli dokazi, ki bi lahko vplivali na ugotovitev iz člena 1 tega sklepa, da je varstvo v Državi Izrael ustrezno v smislu člena 25 Direktive 95/46/ES, in morebitnimi dokazi, da se ta sklep izvaja na diskriminatoren način.
In particular, it shall monitor the processing of personal data in manual databases.
Zlasti spremlja obdelavo osebnih podatkov v ročnih podatkovnih zbirkah.
Member States shall take all the measures necessary to comply with the Decision within three months of the date of its notification.
Države članice sprejmejo vse ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem sklepom, v treh mesecih od datuma njegove notifikacije.
Done at Brussels, 31 January 2011.
V Bruslju, 31. januarja 2011
Document WP114 of 25 November 2005. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2005/wp114_en.pdf
Dokument DS 114 z dne 25. novembra 2005 je na voljo na: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2005/wp114_sl.pdf.
Competent supervisory authority referred to in Article 1(2) of this Decision:
Pristojni nadzorni organ iz člena 1(2) tega sklepa:
Tel. + 972-3-7634050
Telefon: +972 37634050
Fax + 972-2-6467064
Telefaks: +972 26467064
E-mail: ILITA@justice.gov.il
e-naslov: ILITA@justice.gov.il
Website: http://www.justice.gov.il/MOJEng/RashutTech/default.htm
Spletna stran: http://www.justice.gov.il/MOJEng/RashutTech/default.htm
Opinion 6/2009/EC on the level of protection of personal data in Israel. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2009/wp165_en.pdf
Mnenje 6/2009 o ravni varstva osebnih podatkov v Izraelu je na voljo na: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2009/wp165_sl.pdf.
adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region
o sprejetju četrtega posodobljenega seznama za Skupnost pomembnih območij v alpski biogeografski regiji v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/43/EGS
Having regard to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [1], and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 4(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst [1] ter zlasti tretjega pododstavka člena 4(2) Direktive,
The Alpine biogeographical region referred to in Article 1(c)(iii) of Directive 92/43/EEC comprises the Union territories of the Alps (Austria, Italy, Germany, France and Slovenia), the Pyrenees (France and Spain), the Apennine mountains (Italy), the northern Fennoscandian mountains (Sweden and Finland), the Carpathian mountains (Poland, Slovakia and Romania) and the Balkan, Rila, Pirin, Rhodope and the Sashtinska Sredna Gora mountains (Bulgaria) as specified in the biogeographical map approved on 25 April 2005 by the Committee set up by Article 20 of that Directive, hereinafter the ‘Habitats Committee’.
Alpska biogeografska regija iz člena 1(c)(iii) Direktive 92/43/EGS zajema ozemlja Unije na območju Alp (Avstrija, Italija, Nemčija, Francija in Slovenija), Pirenejev (Francija in Španija), Apeninov (Italija), severnega fenoskandijskega gorovja (Švedska in Finska), Karpatov (Poljska, Slovaška in Romunija), Balkanskega, Rilskega in Pirinskega gorovja, Rodopov ter Saštinske Sredne gore (Bolgarija), kot je podrobno določeno na biogeografski karti, ki jo je 25. aprila 2005 odobril odbor, ustanovljen s členom 20 navedene direktive, v nadaljnjem besedilu: odbor za habitate.
It is necessary in the context of a process which was initiated in 1995 to make further progress in the actual establishment of the Natura 2000 network, which is an essential element of the protection of biodiversity in the Union.
Pri procesu, ki se je začel izvajati leta 1995, je treba doseči nadaljnji napredek pri dejanskem vzpostavljanju omrežja Natura 2000, ki je bistveni element varstva biotske raznovrstnosti v Uniji.
The initial list and the first three updated lists of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region, within the meaning of Directive 92/43/EEC, were adopted by Commission Decisions 2004/69/EC [2], 2008/218/EC [3], 2009/91/EC [4] and 2010/42/EU [5].
Prvotni seznam in prve tri posodobljene sezname za Skupnost pomembnih območij v alpski biogeografski regiji v skladu z Direktivo 92/43/EGS je Komisija sprejela z odločbami 2004/69/ES [2], 2008/218/ES [3] in 2009/91/ES [4] ter Sklepom 2010/42/EU [5].
On the basis of Articles 4(4) and 6(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, the Member State concerned shall designate the sites included in the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region as special areas of conservation as soon as possible and within six years at most, establishing conservation priorities and the necessary conservation measures.
Na podlagi člena 4(4) in člena 6(1) Direktive 92/43/EGS zadevna država članica čim prej, najpozneje pa v šestih letih določi območja v alpski biogeografski regiji, vključena v seznam za Skupnost pomembnih območij, za posebna ohranitvena območja ter določi prednostne naloge za ohranjanje in potrebne ohranitvene ukrepe.
In the context of a dynamic adaptation of the Natura 2000 network, the lists of sites of Community importance are reviewed.
Seznami za Skupnost pomembnih območij se pregledujejo v okviru dinamičnega prilagajanja omrežja Natura 2000.
A fourth update of the Alpine list is therefore necessary.
Seznam za alpsko biogeografsko regijo je zato treba četrtič posodobiti.
On the one hand, the fourth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region is necessary in order to include additional sites that have been proposed since 2008 by the Member States as sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 92/43/EEC.
Na eni strani je treba četrtič posodobiti seznam za Skupnost pomembnih območij v alpski biogeografski regiji, da bi vanj vključili dodatna območja, ki so jih države članice od leta 2008 predlagale za območja, pomembna za Skupnost, v tej biogeografski regiji v skladu členom 1 Direktive 92/43/EGS.
The obligations resulting from Articles 4(4) and 6(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC are applicable as soon as possible and within six years at most from the adoption of the fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region.
Obveznosti iz členov 4(4) in 6(1) Direktive 92/43/EGS veljajo čim prej, najpozneje pa v šestih letih po sprejetju četrtega posodobljenega seznama za Skupnost pomembnih območij v alpski biogeografski regiji.
On the other hand, the fourth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region is necessary in order to reflect any changes in site related information submitted by the Member States following the adoption of the initial and the first three updated Community lists.
Na drugi strani je treba četrtič posodobiti seznam za Skupnost pomembnih območij v alpski biogeografski regiji, da bi tako upoštevali spremenjene informacije o območjih, ki so jih države članice predložile po sprejetju prvotnega in prvih treh posodobljenih seznamov Skupnosti.
In that sense, the fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region constitutes a consolidated version of the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region.
Četrti posodobljeni seznam za Skupnost pomembnih območij v alpski biogeografski regiji tako predstavlja prečiščeno različico seznama za Skupnost pomembnih območij v tej biogeografski regiji.
However, it should be stressed that the obligations resulting from Articles 4(4) and 6(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC are applicable as soon as possible and within six years at most from the adoption of the initial or the first three updated lists of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region, depending on which list a site of Community importance was included as such for the first time.
Treba pa je poudariti, da morajo biti obveznosti iz člena 4(4) in člena 6(1) Direktive 92/43/EGS izpolnjene čim prej, najpozneje pa v šestih letih po sprejetju prvotnega ali prvih treh posodobljenih seznamov za Skupnost pomembnih območij v alpski biogeografski regiji, odvisno od tega, v kateri seznam je bilo za Skupnost pomembno območje prvič vključeno.
For the Alpine biogeographical region, lists of sites proposed as sites of Community importance within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 92/43/EEC have been transmitted to the Commission between March 2002 and November 2009 by the Member States concerned in accordance with Article 4(1) of that Directive.
Za alpsko biogeografsko regijo so zadevne države članice v skladu s členom 4(1) Direktive 92/43/EGS Komisiji med marcem 2002 in novembrom 2009 poslale sezname območij, ki so jih v skladu s členom 1 navedene direktive predlagale za območja, pomembna za Skupnost.
The lists of proposed sites were accompanied by information on each site, supplied in the format established by Commission Decision 97/266/EC of 18 December 1996 concerning a site information format for proposed Natura 2000 sites [6].
Seznamom predlaganih območij so priložile informacije o vsakem območju v obliki, predvideni v Odločbi Komisije 97/266/ES z dne 18. decembra 1996 o obliki informacij za predlagana območja Nature 2000 [6].