natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 608/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 608/2011
determining the extent to which the import licence applications submitted in June 2011 for certain milk products under certain tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 can be accepted
o določitvi obsega, v katerem se lahko odobrijo zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja, predloženi junija 2011, za nekatere mlečne proizvode v okviru nekaterih tarifnih kvot, odprtih z Uredbo (ES) št. 2535/2001
Import licence applications lodged from 1 to 10 June 2011 for certain tariff quotas referred to in Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 of 14 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation No 1255/1999 as regards the import arrangements for milk and milk products and opening tariff quotas [3] relate to quantities greater than those available.
Količine v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja, predloženih od 1. do 10. junija 2011, za nekatere tarifne kvote iz Priloge I k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 2535/2001 z dne 14. decembra 2001 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 glede uvoznega režima za mleko in mlečne proizvode ter o odprtju tarifnih kvot [3], presegajo razpoložljive količine.
For import licence applications lodged from 1 to 10 June 2011 for the tariff quotas referred to in parts I.A, I.F, I.H, I.I, and I.J of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001, licences shall be issued for the quantities requested, multiplied by the allocation coefficient(s) set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Na podlagi zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja za proizvode v okviru tarifnih kvot iz delov I.A, I.F, I.H, I.I in I.J Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 2535/2001, predloženih v obdobju od 1. do 10. junija 2011, se izdajo uvozna dovoljenja za zahtevane količine, za katere se uporabijo koeficienti dodeljevanja iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 609/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 609/2011
Submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4318 were suspended as from 20 January 2011 by Commission Regulation (EU) No 42/2011 of 19 January 2011 suspending submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas [3], in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009.
Vlaganje zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja za zaporedno številko 09.4318 je bilo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 891/2009 od 20. januarja 2011 odloženo z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 42/2011 z dne 19. januarja 2011 o odložitvi vlaganja zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja za proizvode v sektorju sladkorja v okviru nekaterih tarifnih kvot [3].
The suspension laid down by Regulation (EU) No 42/2011 of submission of applications for import licences for order number 09.4318 as from 20 January 2011 is withdrawn.
Odložitev vlaganja zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja za zaporedno številko 09.4318 iz Uredbe (EU) št. 42/2011 se prekliče od 20. januarja 2011.
OJ L 15, 20.1.2011, p. 10.
UL L 15, 20.1.2011, str. 10.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 610/2011
on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of bovine animals
o odobritvi uvoznih pravic za zahtevke, vložene za obdobje od 1. julija 2011 do 30. junija 2012 v okviru tarifnih kvot za zamrznjeno goveje meso, odprtih z Uredbo (ES) št. 431/2008
The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 relate to quantities exceeding those available.
Količine v zahtevkih za uvozne pravice, vloženih za obdobje od 1. julija 2011 do 30. junija 2012, so višje od razpoložljivih.
The quantities for which import right applications covered by the quota with the serial number 09.4003 have been lodged for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 under Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 28,953811 %.
Za zahtevke za uvozne pravice iz kvote z zaporedno številko 09.4003, ki so vloženi za obdobje od 1. julija 2011 do 30. junija 2012 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 431/2008, se uporabi koeficient dodelitve v višini 28,953811 %.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 611/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 611/2011
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria [1], and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 442/2011 z dne 9. maja 2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih glede na razmere v Siriji [1] in zlasti člena 14(1) Uredbe,
In view of the gravity of the situation in Syria and in accordance with Council Implementing Decision 2011/367/CFSP of 23 June 2011 implementing Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria [2], additional persons and entities should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 442/2011,
Ker bi bilo treba glede na resnost razmer v Siriji in v skladu z Izvedbenim sklepom Sveta 2011/367/SZVP z dne 23. junija 2011 o izvajanju Sklepa 2011/273/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Siriji [2] na seznam oseb, subjektov in organov iz Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 442/2011, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, dodati še druge osebe in subjekte –
The persons and entities listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be added to the list set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 442/2011.
Osebe in subjekti, navedeni v Prilogi k tej uredbi, se dodajo na seznam iz Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 442/2011.
(date of birth, place of birth…)
(datum in kraj rojstva itd.)
Brigadier Commander Mohammad Ali JAFARI (a.k.a. JA'FARI, Aziz; a.k.a. JAFARI, Ali; a.k.a. JAFARI, Mohammad Ali; a.k.a. JA'FARI, Mohammad Ali; a.k.a. JAFARI-NAJAFABADI, Mohammad Ali)
poveljnik brigadir Mohammad Ali JAFARI (alias JA'FARI, Aziz; alias JAFARI, Ali; alias JAFARI, Mohammad Ali; alias JA'FARI, Mohammad Ali; alias JAFARI-NAJAFABADI, Mohammad Ali)
(a. k. a Qasim SOLEIMANY)
alias Qasim SOLEIMANY)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 612/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 612/2011
Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors [2], and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 543/2011 z dne 7. junija 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 za sektorja sadja in zelenjave ter predelanega sadja in zelenjave [2] ter zlasti člena 136(1) Uredbe,
This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 June 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 24. junija 2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 613/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 613/2011
to the Commission Regulation of 23 June 2011 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 23. junija 2011 o določitvi reprezentativnih cen v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za jajčni albumin in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1484/95
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 614/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 614/2011
The currently applicable refunds have been fixed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 265/2011 [6].
Trenutno veljavna nadomestila so bila določena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 265/2011 [6].
Regulation (EU) No 265/2011 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (EU) št. 265/2011 se razveljavi.
OJ L 71, 18.3.2011, p. 11.
UL L 71, 18.3.2011, str. 11.
Export refunds on beef and veal applicable from 24 June 2011
Izvozna nadomestila v sektorju govejega mesa, ki se uporabljajo od 24. junija 2011
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 615/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 615/2011
The currently applicable refunds have been fixed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 266/2011 [4].
Trenutno veljavna nadomestila so bila določena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 266/2011 [4].
Regulation (EU) No 266/2011 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (EU) št. 266/2011 se razveljavi.
OJ L 71, 18.3.2011, p. 15.
UL L 71, 18.3.2011, str. 15.
Export refunds on poultrymeat applicable from 24 June 2011
Izvozna nadomestila za perutninsko meso od 24. junija 2011
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 616/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 616/2011
terminating the expiry review and ‘the new exporter’ review of the anti-dumping measures concerning imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China
o zaključku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in pregleda „novega izvoznika“ protidampinških ukrepov glede uvoza nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
THE COUNCIL OF THE OPEAN UNION,
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE –
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 and Article 11(2), (4), (5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), zlasti členov 9 in 11(2), (4), (5) in (6) Uredbe,
In October 2005, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 [2], the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties ranging from 2,7 % to 39,9 % on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’).
Svet je oktobra 2005 na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1659/2005 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve od 2,7 % do 39,9 % na uvoz nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
Following two interim reviews requested by Chinese exporting producers, the Regulation was amended in 2009 by Council Regulations (EC) No 825/2009 [3] and (EC) No 826/2009 [4].
Uredba je bila leta 2009 po dveh vmesnih pregledih, ki so ju zahtevali kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 825/2009 [3] in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 826/2009 [4].
Following the reviews, the anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 currently range from 0 % to 39,9 %.
Po pregledih se protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1659/2005, gibajo med 0 % in 39,9 %.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [5] of the anti-dumping measures in force on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the PRC, the Commission received on 9 July 2010 a request for review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem prenehanju veljavnosti [5] protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz LRK je Komisija 9. julija 2010 prejela zahtevek za pregled v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by the Magnesia Bricks Production Defence Coalition (‘MBPDC’) (‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of the total Union production of certain magnesia bricks.
Zahtevek je vložilo Združenje za zaščito proizvodnje magnezitnih opek (Magnesia Bricks Production Defence Coalition, „MBPDC“) („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 %, celotne proizvodnje Unije nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke.
The request contained prima facie evidence of the likelihood of continuation of dumping and recurrence of injury which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an expiry review proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o verjetnosti nadaljevanja dampinga in o ponovitvi škode, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka pregleda zaradi izteka.
The applicant also claimed that an Austrian-based company, RHI AG (‘RHI’), should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry on the grounds that it had shifted its core business activities to the PRC, where it has a related company producing the product concerned and increased its business activities relating to the product concerned in the PRC.
Vlagatelj je prav tako trdil, da je treba družbo RHI AG („RHI“) s sedežem v Avstriji izključiti iz opredelitve industrije Unije, ker je preusmerila svoje glavne poslovne dejavnosti v LRK, kjer ima povezano družbo, ki proizvaja zadevni izdelek, in povečala svoje poslovne dejavnosti v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom v LRK.
Initiation of the expiry review
Začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa
On 8 October 2010 the Commission, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘the notice of initiation’) [6], the initiation of an expiry review proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain magnesia bricks originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 8. oktobra 2010 po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom z objavo obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije („obvestilo o začetku“) napovedala začetek postopka pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo [6].
Investigation period of the expiry review
Obdobje preiskave za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa
In view of the apparent large number of parties involved in the proceeding, the Commission announced in the notice of initiation that it may apply sampling in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število strani, vključenih v postopek, je Komisija v obvestilu o začetku objavila, da se lahko v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe odloči za vzorčenje.
In order to enable it to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers, importers and Union producers were required to provide certain information for the period 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Da bi se lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno in če je, da lahko izbere vzorčne proizvajalce izvoznike, so morali uvozniki in proizvajalci Unije zagotoviti nekatere informacije za obdobje od 1. julija 2009 do 30. junija 2010 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The product concerned is chemically bonded, unfired magnesia bricks, whose magnesia component contains at least 80 % MgO, whether or not containing magnesite, currently falling within CN codes ex68159100 and ex68159900.
Zadevni izdelek je kemijsko vezana, nežgana magnezitna opeka, ki vsebuje vsaj 80 % MgO, ki vsebuje magnezit ali ne, trenutno uvrščen v oznaki KN ex68159100 in ex68159900.
The like product is defined as chemically bonded, unfired magnesia bricks, whose magnesia component contains at least 80 % MgO, whether or not containing magnesite, produced and sold in the Union market.
Podobni izdelek je opredeljen kot kemijsko vezana, nežgana magnezitna opeka, ki vsebuje vsaj 80 % MgO, vsebuje magnezit ali ne, proizveden in prodan na trgu Unije.
Magnesia bricks are manufactured using magnesite minerals as the main raw material.
Glavna surovina pri proizvajanju magnezitne opeke so magnezitni minerali.
They are normally produced to standard chemical specifications which are then altered to fit the demands of the end-user.
Običajno se proizvaja v skladu s standardnimi kemičnimi specifikacijami, ki so nato spremenjene, da se zadosti zahtevam končnega uporabnika.
Magnesia bricks are normally used in steel production as a lining for the vessels in which the steel is melted.
Magnezitna opeka se običajno uporablja pri proizvodnji jekla kot obloga posod, v katerih se tali jeklo.
PARTIES CONCERNED BY THE INVESTIGATION
STRANI, KI JIH ZADEVA PREISKAVA
The Commission officially advised the applicant, other known producers in the Union, the known exporting producers in the PRC, the representatives of the exporting country concerned and known importers and users of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, predstavnike zadevne države izvoznice, znane uvoznike in znane uporabnike uradno obvestila o začetku postopka.
In view of the large number of parties involved sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation for the Chinese exporting producers, unrelated Union importers and Union producers.
Glede na številne vključene strani je bilo vzorčenje predvideno v obvestilu o začetku preiskave za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, nepovezane uvoznike Unije in proizvajalce Unije.
Of the seventy-eight exporting producers contacted at initiation only four provided the information for the selection of the sample requested in the notice of initiation.
Od oseminsedemdesetih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, s katerimi je bil vzpostavljen stik na začetku, so informacije za izbiro vzorca, zahtevanega v obvestilu o začetku preiskave, zagotovili le štirje.
With regard to Union producers, a total of ten companies, including the producers on behalf of whom MBPDC requested the review, submitted the requested information.
Glede proizvajalcev Unije je zahtevane informacije skupaj predložilo deset družb, vključno s proizvajalci, v imenu katerih je MBPDC zahtevalo pregled.
The Union producers requesting the review are heavily dependent on the supply of a major raw material from the PRC and have requested confidential treatment for their company names in view of possible retaliatory action.
Proizvajalci Unije, ki zahtevajo pregled, so močno odvisni od dobave glavne surovine iz LRK in so zaradi morebitnih povračilnih ukrepov zaprosili za zaupno obravnavo glede njihovih imen družb.
The Commission services had contacted all Union producers of magnesia bricks prior to initiation to obtain information on their production levels and to determine their support or opposition to the investigation.
Službe Komisije so pred začetkom stopile v stik z vsemi proizvajalci Unije magnezitne opeke, da bi pridobile informacije o njihovih stopnjah proizvodnje in določile podporo ali nasprotovanje preiskavi.
One of the companies that replied, RHI AG, expressed its opposition to the expiry review prior to initiation.
Ena od družb, ki je odgovorila, družba RHI AG, je izrazila svoje nasprotovanje pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa pred začetkom.
As mentioned in recital 3 above, the applicant had considered that RHI AG should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry on the grounds that it had shifted its core business activities to the PRC.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 3 je vložnik zagovarjal stališče, da je treba družbo RHI AG izključiti iz opredelitve industrije Unije z utemeljitvijo, da je preusmerila svoje glavne poslovne dejavnosti v LRK.
In view of this and the fact that RHI AG expressed opposition to the review, the Commission asked RHI to provide additional information in order to examine whether or not it should be included in the definition of the Union industry.
Glede na to in na dejstvo, da je družba RHI AG nasprotovala pregledu je Komisija pozvala družbo RHI, da zagotovi dodatne informacije za preučitev, ali jo je treba vključiti v opredelitev industrije Unije ali ne.
The requested information concerned the company’s business activities both in the EU and in the PRC and included data on its production capacity, production volumes, sales value and volumes in and outside the EU and the PRC and imports value and volume of the product concerned in the Union market.
Zahtevane informacije so zadevale poslovne dejavnosti družbe v EU in LRK ter so vključevale podatke o njeni proizvodni zmogljivosti, obsegu proizvodnje, prodajni vrednosti in obsegu v in zunaj EU ter LRK ter o uvozni vrednosti in obsegu uvoza zadevnega izdelka na trg Unije.
The company provided the additional information and an on-spot verification visit took place at the company’s headquarters in Vienna.
Družba je zagotovila dodatne informacije, preveritveni obisk na kraju samem pa je potekal na sedežu družbe na Dunaju.
In the original investigation initiated in July 2004, RHI was one of the complainant Union producers.
V prvotni preiskavi, ki se je začela julija 2004, je bila družba RHI ena od proizvajalcev pritožnikov Unije.
At that time RHI was also importing the product concerned from its related company in the PRC and it was examined whether the company should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Družba RHI je v tem času prav tako uvažala zadevni izdelek iz svoje povezane družbe v LRK, preučilo pa se je tudi, ali je treba družbo izključiti iz opredelitve industrije Unije v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) osnovne uredbe.
It is recalled that the assessment of RHI’s situation was made in Commission Regulation (EC) No 552/2005 of 11 April 2005 imposing a provisional duty on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China [7] and confirmed by Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005.
Spomniti je treba, da je bila ocena položaja družbe RHI izvedena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 552/2005 z dne 11. aprila 2005 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske [7] in potrjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1659/2005.
For the purpose of the assessment, the following criteria were examined:
Za oceno so bila preučena naslednja merila:
the location of the company’s headquarters, research and development (R & D) centre and main production sites,
lokacija sedeža podjetja, raziskovalno-razvojnega centra in glavnih proizvodnih obratov,
the volume/value of the product concerned imported from the PRC compared to the total sales volume and value,
obseg/vrednost zadevnega izdelka, uvoženega iz LRK v primerjavi s celotnim prodajnim obsegom in prodajno vrednostjo,
the impact the imported sales had on the company’s total Union sales, in particular by comparing the profitability of RHI’s sales in the EU of the imported product concerned with the profitability rates of the cooperating Union producers.
vpliv, ki so ga imele uvozne prodaje na celotno prodajo družbe v Uniji, zlasti s primerjavo dobičkonosnosti prodaj zadevnega uvoženega izdelka družbe RHI v Uniji s stopnjami dobičkonosnosti sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije.
At that time it was found that the company’s core business was situated in the Union as regards the product concerned (its headquarters, R & D centre and biggest production sites were all located in the Union).
Takrat je bilo ugotovljeno, da je glavna dejavnost družbe potekala v Uniji glede zadevnega izdelka (sedež, raziskovalno-razvojni center in največji proizvodni obrati so bili vsi v Uniji).
Moreover, the vast majority of RHI’s sales on the Union market were produced in the Union and only a minor part was produced in the PRC (5 % of its total sales volume in the Union) as the production of the related company in the PRC was mainly aimed at the fast-growing Asian market.
Velika večina prodaje družbe RHI na trgu Unije je bila proizvedena v Uniji in le manjši del je bil proizveden v LRK (5 % celotnega obsega prodaje v Uniji), saj je bila proizvodnja povezane družbe v LRK namenjena predvsem hitro rastočemu azijskemu trgu.
In addition, it was found that these imports were resold at prices comparable to those of the Union industry and therefore the company was not enjoying substantial beneficial effects, in terms of profitability, by reselling the imported product.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da družba s preprodajo uvoženega izdelka ni uživala znatnih koristnih učinkov glede dobičkonosnosti, ker je bil ta uvoz preprodan po ceni, ki je primerljiva ceni industrije Unije.
Finally, it was explicitly mentioned that RHI’s Union production company was a separate legal entity from its Chinese production company.
Izrecno je bilo tudi navedeno, da sta proizvodni družbi RHI v Uniji in na Kitajskem ločena pravna subjekta.
It was found that, although RHI AG was a global group with a production site in the PRC constituting a separate legal entity, it still produced the vast majority of its magnesia bricks, which were subsequently sold on the Union market, at its Union production sites.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da družba RHI AG v svojih proizvodnih obratih v Uniji še vedno proizvaja veliko večino magnezitne opeke, ki je nato prodana na trgu Unije, čeprav je globalna skupina in ima v LRK proizvodni obrat kot ločen pravni subjekt.