natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was claimed that one of the representative Union producers cooperated only partially as it was allegedly related to another producer that did not cooperate in the investigation.
Po teh trditvah je en reprezentativni proizvajalec Unije sodeloval samo delno, ker je bil domnevno povezan z nekim drugim proizvajalcem, ki ni sodeloval v preiskavi.
The companies were alleged to be related as a consequence of transitional agreements concluded at the time of the acquisition by the cooperating Union producer of the CFP business segment of the other producer It was alleged that through these transitional agreements the cooperating Union producer controls some of the mills which remained in the ownership of the partially acquired producer.
Družbi sta bili domnevno povezani zaradi prehodnih sporazumov, ki so bili sklenjeni v času, ko je sodelujoči proizvajalec Unije pridobil področni odsek PFP drugega proizvajalca. Zaradi teh prehodnih sporazumov sodelujoči proizvajalec Unije domnevno nadzoruje nekatere obrate, ki so ostali v lasti delno pridobljenega proizvajalca.
To support its claim the exporting producer made reference to the Commission Decision [5] examining at the time of the acquisition whether the transaction should be considered as an acquisition within the meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) [6].
Proizvajalec izvoznik se je v podporo svoji trditvi skliceval na Odločbo Komisije [5], v kateri se je v času pridobitve obravnavalo, ali velja transakcija kot pridobitev v smislu Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 y dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij (Uredba ES o ydružitvah) [6].
This claim was already addressed in recital (91) of the provisional Regulation.
Ta trditev je bila obravnavana že v uvodni izjavi (91) začasne uredbe.
It is recalled that the transitional agreements referred to did not show any relationship between the companies that would be extending beyond a normal business relationship between a buyer and a seller.
Opozoriti je treba, da navedeni prehodni sporazumi niso pokazali take povezave med družbama, ki bi presegala normalne poslovne odnose med kupcem in prodajalcem.
In particular, the terms of the transitional agreements aim to administer the coated paper sales for a transitional period and according to these terms the Union producer only has functions comparable to a sales agent during the transitional period.
Namen pogojev prehodnih sporazumov je zlasti urejati prodajo premazanega papirja v prehodnem obdobju in v skladu s temi pogoji ima proizvajalec Unije samo funkcije, ki so primerljive s funkcijami prodajnega zastopnika v prehodnem obdobju.
Furthermore, in its consolidated audited accounts and in its reply to the questionnaire it reported commission income while acting as an agent for the mills concerned; no ownership and therefore no costs were recognized for these mills by the Union producer.
Poleg tega je v konsolidiranih revidiranih računovodskih izkazih ter v odgovoru na vprašalnik sporočil prihodke od provizij, ko je deloval kot zastopnik zadevnih obratov; zato proizvajalec Unije ni izkazoval lastništva in tako tudi ne nobenih stroškov za te obrate.
According to the Commission Decision referred to above, the transaction between the companies was considered as an acquisition by the Union producer of part of the other companies’ business, not the take-over of the company as such.
V skladu z navedeno odločbo Komisije je transakcija med družbama veljala za pridobitev dela poslovne dejavnosti druge družbe, ki jo je opravil proizvajalec Unije, ne pa za prevzem družbe.
The Decision does not suggest that the companies should be considered as one entity after the acquisition; in particular, there is no joint venture between the companies.
Odločba ne trdi, da bi se družbi morali šteti za en subjekt po pridobitvi; med družbama zlasti ni nobene skupne družbe.
It is also noted that the geographical scope examined in the above decision is EEA – wide and not EU wide.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da je geografsko obseg uporabe navedene odločbe Evropski gospodarski prostor in ne Evropska unija.
To note is also that in the Decision the Commission did not analyze the relationship between the companies in question within the meaning of Article 143 of the IPCCC [7].
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da Komisija v Odločbi ni analizirala povezave med zadevnima družbama v smislu člena 143 IPCCC [7].
In this regard, there are consequently no grounds to re-consider the provisional conclusions, i.e. that the two companies are not related in the sense of Article 143 of the IPCCC and that the Union producer in question cooperated fully with the investigation.
V zvezi s tem zato ni razloga za ponovno obravnavo začasnih sklepnih ugotovitev, tj. da družbi nista povezani v smislu člena 143 IPCCC in da je zadevni proizvajalec Unije v celoti sodeloval v preiskavi.
The exporting producer also claimed that each affiliated company of the Union producers should have filled in a separate questionnaire reply as they were separate legal entities.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da bi vsaka povezana družba proizvajalcev Unije morala ločeno izpolniti vprašalnik, ker so ločeni pravni subjekti.
The exporting producer claimed discrimination as it was requested to provide a separate MET claim for each entity within the group.
Kitajska skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdila, da je bila diskriminirana, ker je morala zagotoviti ločeni zahtevek za TGO za vsak subjekt znotraj skupine.
It is noted that in case of MET claims, a group of companies has the burden of proof of showing that all companies in the group fulfill the MET-criteria as the determination of whether or not MET should be granted is specific to the group.
Treba je opozoriti, da je v primeru zahtevkov za TGO dokazno breme na skupini družb, ki mora dokazati, da vse družbe v skupini izpolnjujejo merila TGO, ker velja odločitev, ali se TGO odobri ali ne, posebej za skupino.
In the case of the questionnaires for Union producers, the purpose is to determine whether material injury to the Union industry (as a whole) exists during the IP.
Namen vprašalnikov za proizvajalce Unije je ugotoviti, ali obstaja znatna škoda za (celotno) industrijo Unije v OP.
The claim of discrimination disregards the clear difference between the objectives of an injury investigation and a MET determination.
Trditev o diskriminaciji zanemarja jasno razliko med cilji preiskave škode in cilji določitve TGO.
In any event, in the case of the Union producer in question it was considered that one questionnaire reply would be sufficient for a meaningful reply and analysis of the injury aspects.
V primeru zadevnega proizvajalca Unije pa je bilo sklenjeno, da bo en izpolnjen vprašalnik zadoščal za tehten odgovor in analizo vidikov škode.
In particular, the reply provided a detailed breakdown of information at individual paper mill level and all the necessary data relating to all of the related producers/sellers of the like product could be verified during the verification visits.
Odgovor je zlasti zagotovil podrobno razčlembo informacij na ravni posameznih obratov za proizvodnjo papirja in vsi potrebni podatki v zvezi z vsemi povezanimi proizvajalci/prodajalci podobnega izdelka so se lahko preverili med preveritvenimi obiski.
In a subsequent submission the exporting producer also claimed that the same company failed to fully cooperate as it filed its questionnaire reply on behalf of a non-existing entity and that the audited accounts of the company do not reflect the data provided in its questionnaire reply.
V nadaljnjem stališču je proizvajalec izvoznik tudi trdil, da ista družba ni v celoti sodelovala, ker je vložila izpolnjen vprašalnik v imenu neobstoječega subjekta, ter da revidirani računovodski izkazi družbe ne izražajo podatkov, ki jih je zagotovila v izpolnjenem vprašalniku.
The conclusions in the preceding recital are relevant also in this regard.
V zvezi s tem so pomembne tudi sklepne ugotovitve iz prejšnje uvodne izjave.
Therefore the conclusions in recital (88) to (91) remain unaffected.
Zato ostajajo sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (88) do (91) nespremenjene.
The government of PRC argued that the macro-economic data used for the analysis is incomplete and inaccurate thus cannot be used as a positive evidence of material injury.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da so makroekonomski podatki, uporabljeni za analizo, nepopolni in netočni ter se zato ne morejo uporabiti kot trden dokaz znatne škode.
The on-spot verification at the complainant confirmed that the data used to establish macroeconomic indicators are directly collected from Union producers covering around 98 % of the total Union production and are sufficiently detailed to identify information about the product concerned.
Preverjanje na kraju samem pri združenju pritožnika je potrdilo, da so podatki, ki so bili uporabljeni za določitev makroekonomskih kazalnikov, prejeti neposredno od proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo okoli 98 % celotne proizvodnje Unije, in so dovolj podrobni, da se lahko razločijo informacije o zadevnem izdelku.
Assumption and / or estimations used were made on a reasonable and justifiable basis, e.g. cutter rolls were not taken into account because of their clearly insignificant volumes as witnessed in their proportion in the total sales volume of the representative Union producers.
Uporabljena predvidevanja in/ali ocene so nastala na razumni in utemeljeni osnovi, tj. zvitki za rezalnike se niso upoštevali, ker je bil njihov obseg nedvomno zanemarljiv v primerjavi s celotnim obsegom prodaje reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije.
The exporting producer claimed that the market share of the Union producers should also include imports from Switzerland as these come from a mill owned by one of the representative Union producer.
Ena skupina kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdila, da bi tržni delež proizvajalcev Unije moral vključevati tudi uvoz blaga iz Švice, ker izvira iz obrata, katerega lastnik je en reprezentativni proizvajalec Unije.
The geographical scope of anti-dumping investigations is the European Union.
Geografsko je obseg uporabe protidampinških preiskav Evropska unija.
It was also claimed that the complainant's market share increased remarkably during the period considered.
Prav tako je bila izražena trditev, da se je tržni delež pritožnika izredno povečal v obravnavanem obdobju.
Market share is a macro indicator analyzed at the level of the whole Union industry and not at the level of the complainant.
Tržni delež je makrokazalnik, ki se analizira na ravni celotne industrije Unije in ne na ravni pritožnikov.
Secondly, the statement concerning the complainant's market share is factually erroneous.
Izjava v zvezi s tržnim deležem pritožnika je sicer glede na dejstva napačna.
In the absence of any further comments in this regard, the provisional findings set out in recitals (92) to (98) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker glede tega ni bilo nadaljnjih pripomb, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (92) do (98) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Data relating to the representative Union producers (microeconomic indicators)
Podatki, ki se nanašajo na reprezentativne proizvajalce Unije (mikroekonomski kazalniki)
The exporting producer commented that the injury analysis is flawed due to the fact that information about the paper mills that were acquired by the Union producer referred to in recital (93) was not included in the analysis of the microeconomic indicators for the years 2006-2008.
Ena stran je pripomnila, da je analiza škode pomanjkljiva, ker informacije o obratih za proizvodnjo papirja, ki jih je pridobil proizvajalec Unije iz uvodne izjave (93), niso bile vključene v analizo mikroekonomskih kazalnikov za leta 2006–2008.
Following the arguments presented by this party the microeconomic indicators were adjusted to present a fully comparable trend over the years by excluding information about the acquired mills for all years under examination.
Na podlagi argumentov strani so se mikroekonomski kazalniki prilagodili, da bi prikazali popolnoma primerljivo gibanje v zadevnih letih, in sicer tako da so se izključile informacije o pridobljenih obratih za vsa leta preiskave.
Following the modified scope of the data used for the analysis of the economic situation of the representative Union producers, as explained in the previous recital, the microeconomic indicators are definitively established as follows:
Po spremenjenem obsegu podatkov, uporabljenih za analizo gospodarskega položaja reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije, kot je pojasnjeno v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, se makroekonomski kazalniki dokončno določijo, kot sledi.
Average unit prices of the representative Union producers
Povprečne cene reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije na enoto
Despite the slightly modified figures, the basic trends and the findings in recital (99) in the provisional Regulation concluding that prices of coated fine paper remained stable over the years are confirmed.
Kljub nekoliko spremenjenim podatkom se osnovna gibanja in ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (99) začasne uredbe, po katerih so cene premazanega finega papirja ostale stabilne v zadnjih letih, potrdijo.
Source: Verified questionnaire replies.
Vir: preverjeni izpolnjeni vprašalniki
The representative Union producers increased their stock levels by 10 % during the period considered, in particular between 2006 and 2007 and later between 2008 and the IP.
Reprezentativni proizvajalci Unije so v obravnavanem obdobju povečali obseg zalog za 10 %, zlasti med letoma 2006 in 2007 ter pozneje med letom 2008 in OP.
Due to the paper mill closures and consolidation of the representative Union producers, the number of employees was reduced substantially by 20 % (almost 1600 jobs) during the period considered.
Zaradi zapiranja obratov in konsolidacije reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije se je število zaposlenih med obravnavanim obdobjem znatno zmanjšalo, to je za 20 % (skoraj 1600 delovnih mest).
Efficiency gains have been achieved by raising and maintaining a high output per employee even at a time of significant layoffs.
Učinkovitost se je povečala z dvigovanjem in vzdrževanjem visoke produktivnosti na zaposlenega celo v času znatnih odpuščanj.
Labour costs increased steadily, totalling an 8 % increase over the period considered.
Stroški dela so se enakomerno poviševali in se v obravnavanem obdobju v celoti povišali za 8 %.
The conclusions presented in recital (102) of the provisional Regulation are thus further supported by the slightly modified figures.
Sklepne ugotovitve, predstavljene v uvodni izjavi (102) začasne uredbe, tako dodatno potrjujejo nekoliko spremenjeni podatki.
Change (100=2006)
Sprememba (100 = 2006)
The profitability rate throughout the period considered was corrected to reflect more accurately the profitability level.
Stopnja dobičkonosnosti v obravnavanem obdobju je bila popravljena, da natančneje izraža raven dobičkonosnosti.
However, the basic trend concerning profitability remains unaffected by the change.
Vendar ta sprememba ne vpliva na osnovno gibanje dobičkonosnosti.
The representative Union producers incurred losses in the years 2006 to 2008 and the financial situation only turned positive in 2009 when the world price of pulp, the main raw material exceptionally decreased significantly as a result of the economic downturn.
Reprezentativni proizvajalci Unije so imeli v obdobju 2006–2008 izgubo, finančno stanje pa je postalo pozitivno šele leta 2009, ko so se svetovne cene papirne kaše, glavne surovine, izjemoma znatno znižale zaradi upada gospodarske rasti.
The drop in the price of pulp (– 19 %) was considered an abnormally large drop that directly contributed to the improved financial situation in the IP.
Znižanje cene papirne kaše (–19 %) je pomenilo nenormalno velik padec, ki je neposredno prispeval k izboljšanju finančnega stanja v OP.
It is to be noted that since the IP, pulp prices have returned to their pre-IP levels.
Treba je opozoriti, da so se po OP cene papirne kaše vrnile na raven pred OP.
Subject to the slight modification of the figures, the findings concerning cash flow, investment and return on investment presented in recital (104) and (105) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju manjših sprememb podatkov se ugotovitve v zvezi z denarnim tokom, naložbami in donosnostjo naložb, predstavljene v uvodnih izjavah (104) in (105) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
The exporting producer claimed that the improvement of profitability should not be considered as a limited instance based on an exceptional drop of raw material costs as explained in recital (107) of the provisional Regulation.
Ena stran je trdila, da povečanja dobičkonosnosti ne bi smeli razumeti kot izjeme, ki je nastala zaradi izjemnega znižanja stroškov surovin, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (107) začasne uredbe.
The drop in costs benefited both: all local as well as Chinese producers, not only the complainant. Therefore the breakthrough in profitability was not exclusively based on the drop in costs but was rather the result of a change in the pricing behaviour of the complainant.
Padec stroškov je bil koristen za: vse lokalne in kitajske proizvajalce, ne samo za pritožnike, zato uspeh dobičkonosnosti ni nastal izključno zaradi padca stroškov, ampak je bil bolj posledica spremenjenega ravnanja pritožnikov pri določanju cen.
Furthermore the exporting producer claimed that the profitability is driven by CFP prices, rather than the price of pulp.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da dobičkonosnost ni odvisna od cene papirne kaše, ampak prej od cen PFP.
It was found, however, that when pulp prices sharply fell in 2009, CFP prices remained stable and profits rose as a consequence.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da so ob močnem padcu cen papirne kaše leta 2009 cene PFP ostale stabilne, dobiček pa se je posledično povečal.
Therefore given that prices remained stable, no correlation can be made between prices and profitability in this specific time period.
Ker so torej cene ostale stabilne, ne moremo iskati povezav med cenami in dobičkonosnostjo v tem konkretnem obdobju.
The profitability rate is an indicator that is analysed at the level of the representative Union producers and not at the level of the complainant, as suggested by the party.
Stopnja dobičkonosnosti je kazalnik, ki se analizira na ravni reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije in ne na ravni pritožnikov, kot je to trdila stran.
The analysis of information gathered showed a direct link between the exceptional fall in pulp prices, the main raw material and the increased profitability; whereby stable prices of the finished products indeed played a role in the improvement of profitability.
Analiza zbranih informacij je pokazala neposredno povezavo med izjemnim znižanjem cen papirne kaše, glavnimi surovinami in povečano dobičkonosnostjo, pri čemer so stabilne cene končnih izdelkov dejansko prispevale k izboljšanju dobičkonosnosti.
While this was probably the case for other producers on the market as well, this does not affect the conclusion that this temporary improvement of profitability is due to the exceptional drop in raw material prices in the IP.
Čeprav so se s tem verjetno srečali tudi drugi proizvajalci na trgu, se veljavnost sklepne ugotovitve, da je to začasno povečanje dobičkonosnosti rezultat izjemnega znižanja cen surovin v OP, s tem ne izgubi.
The findings concerning the representative producers’ ability to raise capital presented in recital (106) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ugotovitve v zvezi z zmožnostjo reprezentativnih proizvajalcev, da zberejo kapital, iz uvodne izjave (106) začasne uredbe, se potrdijo.
One exporting producer and the government of PRC claimed that there was no positive evidence that the complaining Union producers suffered material injury.
En proizvajalec izvoznik in kitajska vlada sta trdila, da ni trdnega dokaza, da so pritožniki proizvajalci Unije utrpeli znatno škodo.
On the contrary, the complainants presented overall stable economic results and increased profitability in the IP.
Pritožniki so nasprotno zabeležili stabilne gospodarske rezultate na splošno in povečano dobičkonosnost v OP.
First of all, the state of the Union industry is analysed at the level of the representative Union producers and not at the level of complainants as suggested by the parties.
Prvič, stanje industrije Unije je analizirano na ravni reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije in ne na ravni pritožnikov, kot sta to trdili strani.
Secondly, as already pointed out in recitals (89) and (107) above, the conclusions of these parties seem to have been drawn from indicators calculated on the basis of different datasets and information than that which was established during the investigation and presented above and in the provisional Regulation.
Drugič, kot je bilo že navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (89) in (107), se zdi, da so sklepne ugotovitve nastale na podlagi kazalnikov, ki so bili izračunani na podlagi drugih podatkovnih zbirk in informacij od teh, ki so bile ugotovljene med preiskavo ter so predstavljene zgoraj in v začasni uredbi.
Consequently, these conclusions are factually wrong.
Te sklepne ugotovitve so posledično glede na dejstva napačne.
Furthermore, the parties’ analysis was not consistent in the use of two different datasets for macro and micro indicators.
Poleg tega analiza strani ni bila dosledna glede uporabe dveh različnih podatkovnih zbirk za makro- in mikrokazalnike.
It was further claimed that the improvement of profitability should be regarded also as a consequence of the restructuring efforts of the industry including reduction of production, employment and increased productivity.
Trdila sta tudi, da bi morali povečanje dobičkonosnosti tudi razumeti kot rezultat prizadevanj industrije za prestrukturiranje, vključno z zmanjšanjem proizvodnje in zaposlenosti ter povečanjem produktivnosti.
In this case, the latter factors cannot be deemed to be the sole indicators of injury, but all injury indicators should be looked at together.
V tem primeru slednjih dejavnikov ne moremo šteti za edine kazalnike škode, vendar je treba vse kazalnike škode obravnavati skupaj.
Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation lists the economic factors and indices to be evaluated in the examination of the impact of the dumped imports on the Union industry.
Člen 3(5) osnovne uredbe navaja gospodarske dejavnike in pokazatelje, ki se morajo oceniti pri preiskavi učinka dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Unije.
Article 3(5) explicitly states that the list of factors is not exhaustive, nor can any one or more of these factors necessarily give decisive guidance.
Člen 3(5) izrecno navaja, da seznam dejavnikov ni izčrpen niti nima eden ali več navedenih dejavnikov nujno odločilnega pomena.
Thus, while indicators have to be assessed individually, conclusions should be reached through the analysis of all factors.
Kazalniki morajo sicer biti ocenjeni ločeno, vendar je treba sklepne ugotovitve oblikovati na podlagi analize vseh dejavnikov.
Overall, the claims of the exporting producer and the government of China as presented above do not affect the conclusion reached at the provisional stage which is therefore hereby confirmed, i.e. that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Trditve strani, kot so predstavljene zgoraj, na splošno ne vplivajo na sklepno ugotovitev, ki je nastala v začasni fazi in se torej potrdi, tj. da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
Parties also commented repeatedly on the possible threat of further material injury in view of the huge capacity build-up by Chinese producers supported by State policies and subsidies.
Strani sta se tudi večkrat izrekli glede morebitne grožnje dodatne znatne škode, in sicer zaradi izjemne krepitve zmogljivosti kitajskih proizvajalcev s pomočjo državnih politik in subvencij.
The scope of the investigation was the existence of material injury and not the threat of further material injury.
Obseg preiskave je bil obstoj znatne škode in ne grožnja dodatne znatne škode.
Therefore these comments could not affect the findings and had to be disregarded.
Zato te pripombe niso mogle vplivati na ugotovitve in jih je bilo treba zavrniti.