natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the above, the amended countervailing duty rate should be established at the new rate of subsidisation found during the present partial interim review, as the injury margin calculated in the original anti-subsidy investigation remains higher.
Zato bi bilo treba spremenjeno stopnjo izravnalne dajatve določiti na novi stopnji subvencioniranja, ugotovljeni v tem delnem vmesnem pregledu, ker stopnja škode, izračunana v prvotni protisubvencijski preiskavi, ostaja višja.
Pursuant to Article 24(1), second subparagraph of the basic Regulation and Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [10], no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from export subsidisation.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 24(1) osnovne uredbe in členom 14(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [10] za noben izdelek ne smejo hkrati veljati protidampinški in izravnalni ukrepi za obravnavanje enih in istih razmer, ki izhajajo iz dampinga ali iz izvoznega subvencioniranja.
However, as mentioned in recital (6) above, since the applicant is subject to an anti-dumping duty of 0 % with regard to the product concerned, these provisions do not apply in the present case.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (6) zgoraj, pa za vložnika velja protidampinška dajatev v višini 0 % glede zadevnega izdelka, zato se v tem primeru te določbe ne uporabljajo.
With regard to the rate of duty currently applicable to imports of the product concerned from exporting producers not individually mentioned in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006, i.e. the duty specified as applying to ‘all other companies’ in India, it is noted that the actual modalities of the investigated schemes and their countervailability have not changed with respect to the previous investigation.
Ob upoštevanju stopnje dajatve, ki trenutno velja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki niso posebej navedeni v členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2006, tj. stopnje, za katero je navedeno, da velja za „vse druge družbe“ v Indiji, je treba opozoriti, da se dejanske podrobnosti preiskovanih shem in možnost uvedbe izravnalnih ukrepov proti njim niso spremenile glede na prejšnjo preiskavo.
Thus there is no reason to re-calculate the subsidy and duty rates of these companies.
Tako ni nobenega razloga za preračun stopenj subvencij in dajatev teh družb.
Consequently, the rates of the duty applicable to all companies other than the applicant remain unchanged,
Zato ostanejo stopnje dajatev, ki se uporabljajo za vse družbe, razen za vložnika, nespremenjene –
The rate of the definitive countervailing duty applicable to the net free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products manufactured by the companies listed below, shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne izravnalne dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke, proizvedene v spodaj navedenih družbah, znaša:
Ester Industries Limited, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part-1, New Delhi 110003, India
Ester Industries Limited, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part-1, New Delhi 110 003, Indija
Garware Polyester Limited, Garware House, 50-A, Swami Nityanand Marg, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400057, India
Garware Polyester Limited, Garware House, 50-A, Swami Nityanand Marg, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400 057, Indija
Jindal Poly Films Limited, 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110001, India
Jindal Poly Films Limited, 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110 001, Indija
MTZ Polyfilms Limited, New India Centre, 5th Floor, 17 Co-operage Road, Mumbai 400039, India
MTZ Polyfilms Limited, New India Centre, 5th Floor, 17 Co-operage Road, Mumbai 400 039, Indija
Uflex Limited, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201301 (U.P.), India
Uflex Limited, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201 301 (U.P.), Indija
OJ L 6, 10.1.2009, p. 1.
UL L 6, 10.1.2009, str. 1.
OJ C 215, 9.9.2009, p. 17.
UL C 215, 9.9.2009, str. 17.
This scheme was called Advance Licence Scheme during the previous review investigation that led to the imposition by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 of the definitive countervailing duty currently in force.
Ta shema se je med prejšnjo preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom, ki je pripeljala do trenutno veljavne dokončne izravnalne dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006, imenovala shema vnaprej pridobljenih dovoljenj.
Deemed exports This sub-scheme allows a main contractor to import inputs free of duty which are required in manufacturing goods to be sold as ‘deemed exports’ to the categories of customers mentioned in paragraph 8.2(b) to (f), (g), (i) and (j) of the EXIM policy 04-09.
predvideni izvoz ta podshema omogoča glavnemu izvajalcu brez dajatev uvažati surovine, potrebne za proizvodnjo blaga, ki se kot „predvideni izvoz“ proda kategorijam kupcev, navedenih v odstavku 8.2.(b) do (f), (g), (i) in (j) politike EXIM 2004–2009.
According to the GOI, deemed exports refer to those transactions in which the goods supplied do not leave the country.
Indijska vlada trdi, da se predvideni izvoz nanaša na posle, pri katerih dobavljeno blago ne zapusti države.
The scheme as described above has not changed since the last partial interim review concerning subsidisation for the applicant which was concluded in January 2009.
Shema, kakor je opisana zgoraj, se od zadnjega delnega vmesnega pregleda, ki je bil končan januarja 2009, v zvezi s subvencioniranjem za vložnika ni spremenila.
However, the benefit under this scheme has substantially decreased as shown in recital (39) below.
Vendar so se ugodnosti iz te sheme bistveno zmanjšale, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (39).
According to Article 3(1)(a)(ii) and Annex I(i) of the basic Regulation only when the conditions of Annexes II and III of the basic Regulation are met that the excess remission of duties can be countervailed.
V skladu s členom 3(1)(a)(ii) in Prilogo I(i) k osnovni uredbi je mogoče izravnati presežne odpuste dajatev le, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz prilog II in III k osnovni uredbi.
To the contrary, according to Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation, the investigating authority only has to establish sufficient evidence to refute the appropriateness of an alleged verification system.
Nasprotno, v skladu s členom 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe mora preiskovalni organ samo zbrati zadostne dokaze, da zavrne domnevno ustreznost sistema preverjanja.
This direction obliges commercial banks to carry out functions mentioned in Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation, in this case provide loans in the form of preferential export financing.
Ta usmeritev komercialne banke zavezuje k izvajanju funkcij, omenjenih v členu 3(1)(a)(i) osnovne uredbe, v tem primeru zagotavljanju posojil v obliki preferencialnega financiranja izvoza.
Such direct transfer of funds in the form of loans under certain conditions would normally be vested in the government, and the practice differs, in no real sense, from practices normally followed by governments, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(iv) of the basic Regulation.
Takšen neposredni prenos sredstev v obliki posojil pod določenimi pogoji bi bil običajno v pristojnosti vlade in ta praksa se na noben bistven način ne razlikuje od praks, ki jih običajno izvajajo vlade v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(iv) osnovne uredbe.
Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2006 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
SRF Limited, Block C, Sector 45, Greenwood City, Gurgaon 122003, Haryana, India
SRF Limited, Block C, Sector 45, Greenwood City, Gurgaon 122003, Haryana, Indija
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 580/2010
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 580/2010
amending Regulation (EC) No 452/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards originating, inter alia, in Ukraine
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 452/2007 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz likalnih desk s poreklom med drugim iz Ukrajine
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 452/2007 [2] (the original Regulation), imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards originating, inter alia, in Ukraine.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 452/2007 [2] („prvotna uredba“) je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz likalnih desk s poreklom med drugim iz Ukrajine.
The measures consist of an ad valorem duty at a rate of 9,9 %.
Ukrepi zajemajo stopnjo dajatve ad valorem v višini 9,9 %.
In August 2008, the Commission received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (the interim review).
Komisija je avgusta 2008 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („vmesni pregled“).
The applicant had cooperated in the investigation which led to the findings and conclusions laid down in the original Regulation (the original investigation).
Vložnik je sodeloval v preiskavi, ki je privedla do ugotovitev in sklepov iz prvotne uredbe („prvotna preiskava“).
The anti-dumping duty applicable to the applicant, which is the only known exporting producer of the product concerned in Ukraine, is 9,9 %.
Protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za vložnika, ki je edini znani proizvajalec izvoznik zadevnega izdelka v Ukrajini, je 9,9 %.
In its request, the applicant claimed that the circumstances on the basis of which measures were imposed have changed and that these changes are of a lasting nature.
Vložnik je v svojem zahtevku trdil, da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni ukrepi, spremenile in da so spremembe trajne.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an interim review, the Commission decided to initiate a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the examination of dumping as far as EGI is concerned.
Po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov, ki upravičujejo začetek vmesnega pregleda, zato je sklenila začeti delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, omejen na preučitev dampinga v zvezi z EGI.
The Commission published a notice of initiation on 9 April 2009 in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] (Notice of initiation) and commenced an investigation.
Komisija je 9. aprila 2009 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3] objavila obvestilo o začetku („Obvestilo o začetku“) in začela preiskavo.
The product concerned by the interim review is the same as that in the original investigation, i.e. ironing boards, whether or not free-standing, with or without a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top, including sleeve boards, and essential parts thereof, i.e. the legs, the top and the iron rest, originating in Ukraine, currently falling within CN codes ex39249000, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 and ex85169000.
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva vmesni pregled, je isti kot izdelek iz prvotne preiskave, tj. likalne deske, prostostoječe ali ne, s sistemom za vsrkavanje odvečne pare ali brez njega in/ali z ogrevalnim sistemom, vključno z rokavniki in njihovimi bistvenimi deli, tj. podnožje, prevleka in odlagalna površina za likalnik, s poreklom iz Ukrajine, trenutno uvrščen v oznake KN ex39249000, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 in ex85169000.
The product produced and sold in Ukraine and that exported to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and uses and are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Izdelek, proizveden in prodajan v Ukrajini, in tisti, izvožen v Unijo, imata enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter namen uporabe in se zato štejeta za podobna v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission officially advised the Union industry, the applicant and the authorities of the exporting country of the initiation of the interim review.
Komisija je industrijo Unije, vložnika in organe države izvoznice uradno obvestila o začetku vmesnega pregleda.
The Commission sent a questionnaire to the applicant and received a reply within the deadline set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku poslala vprašalnik in prejela odgovor v za to določenem roku.
Eurogold Industries Ltd, Zhitomir, Ukraine,
Eurogold Industries Ltd, Zhitomir, Ukrajina
and its related company Eurogold Service Zumbühl & Co., Zug in Switzerland (EGS).
in njene povezane družbe Eurogold Service Zumbühl & Co., Zug v Švici („EGS“).
The investigation covered the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2008 do 31. decembra 2008 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
For the determination of normal value, it was first established whether EGI’s total volume of domestic sales of the like product to independent customers was representative in comparison with its total volume of export sales to the Union.
Za določitev normalne vrednosti je bilo najprej ugotovljeno, ali je bila skupna domača prodaja podobnega izdelka družbe EGI neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna v primerjavi z njenim celotnim obsegom izvoza v Unijo.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation domestic sales are considered to be representative when the total domestic sales volume is at least 5 % of the total volume of sales of the product concerned to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se domača prodaja šteje za reprezentativno, če pomeni celotni obseg domače prodaje vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
It was found that the overall sales by EGI of the like product on the domestic market were representative.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bil celotni obseg prodaje EGI podobnega izdelka na notranjem trgu reprezentativen.
For each product type sold by EGI on its domestic market and found to be directly comparable with the product type sold for export to the Union, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki ga je EGI prodal na svojem notranjem trgu in za katerega se je izkazalo, da je neposredno primerljiv z vrsto izdelka, prodanega za izvoz v Unijo, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je bila domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered sufficiently representative when the total volume of that product type sold on the domestic market to independent customers during the IP represented at least 5 % of the total sales volume of the comparable product type exported to the Union.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg navedene vrste izdelka, prodanega v OP neodvisnim strankam na notranjem trgu, pomenil vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste izdelka, izvoženega v Unijo.
It was also examined whether the domestic sales of each product type could be regarded as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preučeno je bilo tudi, ali bi v zvezi z domačo prodajo posamezne vrste izdelka lahko veljalo, da je bila opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of domestic sales to independent customers on the domestic market which were profitable for each exported type of the product concerned during the IP.
To je bilo izvedeno tako, da se je pri vsaki izvoženi vrsti izdelka določil delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam na notranjem trgu med OP.
For those product types where more than 80 % by volume of sales on the domestic market of the product type were above cost and the weighted average sales price of that type was equal to or above the unit cost of production, normal value, by product type, was calculated as the weighted average of the actual domestic prices of all sales of the type in question, irrespective of whether those sales were profitable or not.
Za tiste vrste izdelkov, pri katerih je bilo 80 % obsega prodaje vrste izdelka na notranjem trgu prodanih po ceni, višji od stroškov na enoto, in pri katerih je tehtana povprečna prodajna cena navedene vrste izdelka ustrezala vsaj proizvodnim stroškom na enoto, je bila normalna vrednost po vrsti izdelka izračunana kot tehtano povprečje dejanskih cen celotne prodaje zadevne vrste, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the unit cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, which was calculated as a weighted average price of only the profitable domestic sales of that type made during the IP.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje neke vrste izdelka pomenil 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste ali kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste nižja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtana povprečna cena zgolj dobičkonosne domače prodaje navedene vrste v OP.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular product type sold by EGI could not be used in order to establish normal value, the normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar domačih cen določene vrste izdelka, ki jo je prodajala družba EGI, ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
When constructing normal value pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, the amounts for selling, general and administrative costs and for profits have been based, pursuant to Article 2(6), chapeau, of the basic Regulation, on the actual data pertaining to the production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product, by EGI.
Pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe so zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške ter za dobiček v skladu z uvodno izjavo 2(6) osnovne uredbe temeljili na dejanskih podatkih za proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka družbe EGI v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
Following disclosure of the findings, EGI claimed that the percentage rate for selling, general and administrative costs, which was used when constructing normal value, did not correspond to that in respect of domestic sales made in the ordinary course of trade and that, consequently, certain constructed normal values were overstated in this respect.
Po razkritju ugotovitev je družba EGI trdila, da odstotek za prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške, uporabljen pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti, ne ustreza odstotku za domačo prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovanja in so posledično nekatere konstruirane normalne vrednosti glede tega precenjene.
The claim was examined, but it was found to have no basis since the percentage rate for selling, general and administrative costs used is that reported for domestic sales and is the same irrespective of whether or not sales are made in the ordinary course of trade, since it is expressed as a percentage on turnover.
Pri preučitvi trditve se je pokazalo, da ni utemeljena, ker je bil uporabljen odstotek za prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške za domačo prodajo, ki je isti, ne glede na to, ali so prodaje v običajnem poteku trgovanja ali ne, saj je izražen kot odstotek prometa.
EGI made export sales to the Union either directly to independent customers or through its related company EGS, located in Switzerland.
EGI je izvažal bodisi neposredno v Unijo neodvisnim strankam bodisi po svoji povezani družbi EGS s sedežem v Švici.
Where export sales to the Union were made directly to independent customers in the Union, export prices were established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je bil izvoz v Unijo opravljen neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, so bile izvozne cene določene na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
Where export sales to the Union were made through the related company, EGS, which performed all import functions in relation to the goods entering into free circulation in the Union, i.e. that of a related importer, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of prices at which the imported products were first resold to an independent buyer.
Kadar je bil izvoz opravljen po povezani družbi EGS, ki je opravljala vse uvozne dejavnosti za blago, ki je bilo dano v prosti promet v Uniji, tj. dejavnosti povezanega uvoznika, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe na podlagi cen, po katerih so bili uvoženi izdelki prvič prodani naprej neodvisni stranki.
For this purpose, adjustments were made to take account of all costs, incurred between importation and resale, and for profits accruing, so that a reliable export price could be established.
V ta namen so bile izvedene prilagoditve za upoštevanje vseh stroškov, nastalih med uvozom in ponovno prodajo, kakor tudi nastalega dobička, da bi se lahko določila zanesljiva izvozna cena.
For this purpose, in the absence of new information from independent importers concerning profits accruing, use was made of the same percentage profit as that used in the original investigation.
Ker ni novih informacij neodvisnih uvoznikov glede nastalega dobička, je bil uporabljen enak odstotek dobička kakor tisti, ki je bil uporabljen v prvotni preiskavi.
EGI claimed, under Article 11(10) of the basic Regulation, that, if the export price is established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping duty paid should not be deducted as a cost, since, they argued, it is duly reflected in resale prices.
EGI je v skladu s členom 11(10) osnovne uredbe trdil, da se v primeru, da je izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, plačana protidampinška dajatev ne bi smela odšteti kot strošek, saj naj bi bila pravilno izražena v nadaljnjih prodajnih cenah.
In this regard, the evidence in support of the claim, which consisted of a number of selling price calculations, was examined.
V zvezi s tem so bila preučena dokazila v podporo trditvi, sestavljena iz številnih izračunov prodajne cene.
However, the calculations provided only concerned some of the models sold during the IP and showed that the selling price did not fully reflect the anti-dumping duty in all cases.
Vendar so predloženi izračuni zadevali samo nekatere modele, prodane v OP, in so pokazali, da prodajna cena ni v vseh primerih v celoti izražala protidampinške dajatve.
Consequently, the evidence provided was not found to be conclusive on whether the anti-dumping duty was reflected in the resale prices.
Zato iz predloženih dokazil ni bilo mogoče sklepati, ali je bila protidampinška dajatev v nadaljnjih prodajnih cenah izražena ali ne.
The claim was therefore rejected and, when establishing the export price for sales to the Union made through EGS in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping duty was deducted as a cost.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena, pri določanju izvozne cene za prodajo v Unijo po EGS v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe pa je bila protidampinška dajatev odšteta kot strošek.
Following disclosure of the findings, EGI repeated their claim.
Po razkritju ugotovitev je družba EGI ponovila trditev.