natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Interestingly, the year when this producer managed to increase its sales of Union made products and market shares it also significantly increased its sales of RBM from Thailand.
Zanimivo je, da je proizvajalec v letu, v katerem je povečal svojo prodajo izdelkov, proizvedenih v Uniji, in tržne deleže, znatno povečal tudi prodajo obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo iz Tajske.
Actually, it even became a significant importer of Thai RBM, by purchasing a major part of the Thai exports during that year.
Dejansko je celo postal pomemben uvoznik tajskih obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo, saj je v zadevnem letu kupil velik del tajskega izvoza.
Therefore, even if indeed the second Union producer managed to take over some market shares from the Union industry, it is difficult not to conclude that this company managed to do this because it also benefited from the dumped imports of RBM from Thailand.
Zato tudi če je drugi proizvajalec Unije dejansko uspel prevzeti nekaj tržnega deleža industrije Unije, ni težko priti do zaključka, da je temu podjetju to uspelo zato, ker je imelo korist tudi od dampinškega uvoza obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo iz Tajske.
It is recalled that this producer was excluded from the definition of the Union industry because of his important import activities as compared to his own production.
Spomniti je treba, da je bil ta proizvajalec izključen iz opredelitve industrije Unije zaradi svojih pomembnih uvoznih dejavnosti glede na njegovo lastno proizvodnjo.
Furthermore, the claim already addressed in recital 69 of the provisional Regulation that Indian imports also caused injury to the Union industry was reiterated by interested parties.
Poleg tega so trditev, ki je že obravnavana v uvodni izjavi 69 začasne uredbe, da je indijski uvoz prav tako povzročil škodo industriji Unije, že ponovile zainteresirane strani.
This was based on the fact that India holds around 50 % share of the Union market, i.e. three times more than Thailand, and that the corresponding average prices decreased by 3 % between 2009 and IP, while undercutting Union prices by 24 %.
To je temeljilo na dejstvu, da ima Indija približno 50 % delež trga Unije, tj. trikrat več kot Tajska, in da so se ustrezne povprečne cene med letom 2009 in OP znižale za 3 %, cene Unije pa nelojalno znižale za 24 %.
It was also underlined that a significant portion of the Indian imports was purchased by a company related to the Union industry.
Poudarjeno je bilo tudi, da je znaten del indijskega uvoza kupilo podjetje, povezano z industrijo Unije.
No new arguments were however given in this respect and these claims were already addressed in the provisional Regulation.
Vendar pa glede tega niso bili navedeni nobeni novi argumenti in te trditve so bile obravnavane že v začasni uredbi.
Even if the absolute level of Indian imports was indeed overall higher than that of Thailand, it was shown in the provisional Regulation that these imports developed differently: while Thai imports increased overall during the injury investigation period, both in absolute and relative terms, Indian imports decreased (by almost 10 %) and market shares also slightly diminished.
Tudi če je bila absolutna stopnja indijskega uvoza dejansko precej višja od stopnje uvoza iz Tajske, je bilo v začasni uredbi prikazano, da se je ta uvoz razvijal drugače: medtem ko se je tajski uvoz v obdobju preiskave škode na splošno povečal, tako v absolutnem kot relativnem smislu, se je uvoz iz Indije zmanjšal (za skoraj 10 %), prav tako pa so se nekoliko zmanjšali tudi tržni deleži.
In addition, the Indian average price level was also higher than the Thai import price.
Poleg tega je bila indijska povprečna raven cene višja od tajske uvozne cene.
Furthermore, even if a company related to the Union industry is importing RBM from India, the investigation established that the level of these imports has significantly decreased over the years as mentioned above in recital 32.
Poleg tega je bilo, tudi če podjetje, povezano z industrijo Unije, uvaža obročne mehanizme za vezavo iz Indije, med preiskavo ugotovljeno, da se je raven tega uvoza z leti znatno znižala, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 32.
Finally, several interested parties also claimed that the complainant lost its customers because it became active on the downstream market via its mother company, Ring International Holding (RIH), and that sales of RBM to related companies should be considered carefully because they would not be made at arm’s length.
Več zainteresiranih strani je tudi trdilo, da je pritožnik izgubil svoje stranke, ker je postal aktiven na prodajnem trgu preko svojega matičnega podjetja Ring International Holding (RIH), in da bi bilo treba prodajo obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo povezanim podjetjem skrbno preučiti, ker naj ne bi bila opravljena na podlagi prostega dogovarjanja.
These claims have however been rejected because they were not substantiated and the investigation showed that sales to related companies were negligible as compared to total sales.
Te trditve so bile zavrnjene, ker niso bile utemeljene, in preiskava je pokazala, da je bila prodaja povezanim podjetjem v primerjavi s skupno prodajo zanemarljiva.
Based on the above, the provisional conclusions laid down in recitals 65 to 76 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se začasni sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 65 do 76 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Even if factors other than imports also had some impact on the situation of the Union industry, it is concluded that dumped imports from Thailand have caused material injury to the Union industry, within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation, based on an analysis which has properly distinguished and separated the effects of all known factors from the injurious effects of the dumped imports.
Četudi so imeli na položaj industrije Unije poleg uvoza nekaj vpliva tudi drugi dejavniki, se na podlagi analize, pri kateri so bili učinki vseh znanih dejavnikov ustrezno prepoznani in ločeni od škodljivih učinkov dampinškega uvoza, zaključi, da je dampinški uvoz iz Tajske povzročil industriji Unije znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
Two of the five importers that cooperated during the investigation reacted to the disclosure of the provisional findings and submitted comments in writing.
Dva od petih uvoznikov, ki so sodelovali med preiskavo, sta se odzvala na razkritje začasnih ugotovitev in predložila pisne pripombe.
One of these importers requested to be heard as well as another importer.
Eden izmed teh uvoznikov je zaprosil za zaslišanje, enako pa je storil tudi še en drug uvoznik.
The Commission also decided to carry out a visit at the premises of the sole user that participated to the investigation.
Komisija se je tudi odločila, da bo opravila obisk v prostorih edinega uporabnika, ki je sodeloval v preiskavi.
No comments were made with respect to the recitals 79 to 90 of the provisional Regulation concerning the description of the market and the section related to the interest of the Union industry.
Glede uvodnih izjav 79 do 90 začasne uredbe v zvezi z opisom trga in dela, povezanega z interesom industrije Unije, ni bilo nobenih pripomb.
It is firstly recalled that in the provisional Regulation it was concluded that the imposition of measures could only have a significant negative impact on the situation of one importer, which also produces RBM in the Union.
Najprej je treba spomniti, da je bilo v začasni uredbi ugotovljeno, da bi lahko imela uvedba ukrepov znaten negativen vpliv samo na položaj enega uvoznika, ki obročne mehanizme za vezavo tudi proizvaja v Uniji.
This importer did not react to the imposition of the provisional measures.
Ta uvoznik se ni odzval na uvedbo začasnih ukrepov.
One other importer, which also requested a hearing chaired by the Hearing Officer, mainly questioned the calculation of the dumping margin, the injury analysis and the calculation of the Union consumption.
Drug uvoznik, ki je prav tako zaprosil za zaslišanje, ki ga je vodil pooblaščenec za zaslišanje, je izrazil dvom predvsem glede izračuna dampinške stopnje, analize škode in izračuna potrošnje Unije.
It did however not raise any new comment regarding the Union interest analysis.
Vendar ni predložil nobene nove pripombe glede analize interesa Unije.
A third importer, representing 20 % of the overall Thai imports, requested a hearing during which it was explained that, contrary to the information submitted previously during the investigation, it did not cease all its activities related to RBM — as mentioned in recital 92 of the provisional Regulation — but has transferred them to another office.
Tretji uvoznik, ki predstavlja 20 % skupnega uvoza iz Tajske, je zaprosil za zaslišanje, med katerim je razložil, da v nasprotju z informacijami, ki so bile predhodno predložene med preiskavo, ni prenehal z vsemi dejavnostmi, povezanimi z obročnimi mehanizmi za vezavo – kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 92 začasne uredbe – ampak jih je prestavil v drugo pisarno.
During the hearing, this importer explained that its RBM-business is only complementary to its core one covering other products and did not exclude importing RBM from Thailand even if measures are imposed.
Med zaslišanjem je ta uvoznik pojasnil, da je njegova poslovna dejavnost, povezana z obročnimi mehanizmi za vezavo, samo dopolnilna njegovi osnovni poslovni dejavnosti, ki vključuje druge izdelke, in ni izključil uvoza obročnih mehanizmov iz Tajske, tudi če se uvedejo ukrepi.
However, because of the overhead costs of its large distribution network, this will depend on the level of the anti-dumping duties and on the possibility to increase the price to customers.
Vendar bo to zaradi režijskih stroškov njegovega velikega distribucijskega omrežja odvisno od stopnje protidampinških dajatev in možnosti, da zviša cene kupcem.
Alternatively, this importer would not suffer significant negative consequences from stopping the RBM-business given the minor importance of this activity as compared to its overall business.
Druga možnost je, da glede na majhen pomen te dejavnosti v primerjavi z njegovo celotno dejavnostjo ta uvoznik ne bi utrpel znatnih negativnih posledic zaradi prenehanja poslovne dejavnosti, povezane z obročnimi mehanizmi za vezavo.
As mentioned in recital 5 above, the questionnaire reply of the only cooperating user was verified during the visit at its premises after the imposition of the provisional measures.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5, je bil odgovor edinega sodelujočega uporabnika na vprašalnik preverjen med obiskom njegovih prostorov po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov.
This user is purchasing from a variety of sources, including the Union, India and Thailand.
Ta uporabnik nabavlja pri različnih virih, vključno z Unijo, Indijo in Tajsko.
It also used to import from China but changed its source of supply since the imposition of anti-dumping duties.
Uvažal je tudi iz Kitajske, vendar je od uvedbe protidampinških dajatev zamenjal vir dobave.
Thai imports represent around 10 % of its total purchases of RBM, and the company decided not to import Thai products since the imposition of the provisional measures.
Tajski uvoz predstavlja približno 10 % njegove skupne nabave obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo in podjetje se je odločilo, da od uvedbe začasnih ukrepov ne bo več uvažalo tajskih izdelkov.
Even if so far the measures did not seem to have significantly affected its economic situation, this company nevertheless deplored the limitation of its sources of supply, and especially the fact that now it cannot rely always on short-term delivery of RBM.
Tudi če se zaenkrat ne zdi, da bi ukrepi znatno vplivali na njegov gospodarski položaj, je podjetje kljub vsemu obžalovalo omejitev njegovih virov dobave in zlasti dejstvo, da se ne more več vedno zanašati na kratkoročno dobavo obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo.
Interested parties reiterated their claim, already addressed in the provisional Regulation, that the imposition of measures would lead to limited sources of supply on the Union market.
Zainteresirane strani so ponovile svojo trditev, obravnavano v začasni uredbi, da bi uvedba ukrepov vodila v omejene vire dobave na trgu Unije.
It is thus worth restating that indeed the investigation showed that the Union market is characterised by a limited number of players: there is one producer in India, one in Thailand, two in the Union and some in China.
Zato je treba ponoviti, da je preiskava pokazala, da je za trg Unije značilno omejeno število akterjev: en proizvajalec je v Indiji, en na Tajskem, dva v Uniji in nekaj jih je na Kitajskem.
The purpose of anti-dumping measures is to restore fair competition on the Union market and not to prevent imports.
Namen protidampinških ukrepov je vzpostaviti pošteno konkurenco na trgu Unije in ne preprečiti uvoz.
This may indeed result in a reduction of the level of imports, while measures offset the trade distorting nature of these imports.
To se lahko dejansko odrazi v znižanju ravni uvoza, pri čemer ukrepi preprečujejo za trgovino izkrivljajočo naravo tega uvoza.
This is however, as such, not a sufficient reason to question the imposition of measures against dumped imports.
Vendar to samo po sebi ni zadosten razlog za dvom v uvedbo ukrepov proti dampinškemu uvozu.
It could even be argued that fair competition should be guaranteed on the Union market to ensure the continued existence of all sources of supply in the long term.
Lahko bi celo trdili, da bi bilo treba za zagotovitev nadaljnjega dolgoročnega obstoja vseh virov dobave na trgu Unije zagotoviti pošteno konkurenco.
It is expected that with a level of the definitive duty, which is lower than the provisional one, Thai imports could still enter the Union market, while the investigation has shown that there are also other sources of supply, even if in limited number.
Pričakuje se, da bo s stopnjo dokončne dajatve, ki je nižja od začasne, tajski uvoz še vedno lahko vstopil na trg Unije, preiskava pa je pokazala, da obstajajo tudi drugi viri dobave, pa čeprav v omejenem številu.
Conclusion on the Union interest
Sklep o interesu Unije
In the light of the above, and in the absence of any other comments, recitals 77 to 110 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed and it is concluded that overall, based on the information available concerning the Union interest, there are no compelling reasons against the imposition of definitive measures against imports of RBM originating in Thailand.
Glede na navedeno in ker v zvezi s tem ni drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 77 do 110 začasne uredbe potrdijo in se zaključi, da na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij v zvezi z interesom Unije na splošno ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov na uvoz obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo s poreklom iz Tajske.
In the absence of any comments as to the injury elimination level, recitals 111 to 114 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede stopnje odprave škode, se uvodne izjave 111 do 114 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
With respect to the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it has been commented that the anti-dumping duty should be reduced to 6 %, since allegedly Indian imports are not dumped and are 6 % higher than Thai imports.
Glede zneska dajatve, potrebnega za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, je bila predložena pripomba, da bi bilo treba protidampinško dajatev znižati na 6 %, saj indijski uvoz domnevno ni dampinški in je za 6 % višji od tajskega uvoza.
In this respect, it is noted that the purpose of anti-dumping duties is not to align prices to those of other sources but to eliminate the distorting effects of injurious dumping.
S tem v zvezi je treba spomniti, da namen protidampinških dajatev ni izravnati cene s tistimi iz drugih virov, ampak odpraviti izkrivljajoče učinke škodljivega dampinga.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the lowest of the dumping and injury margins found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Na podlagi ugotovitev v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije ter v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na stopnji najnižje ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom manjše dajatve.
In this case, the duty rate should accordingly be set at the level of the dumping found.
V tem primeru bi bilo treba stopnjo dajatve določiti na ugotovljeni stopnji dampinga.
This was calculated at 16,3 % having fallen significantly since the provisional stage.
Ta je bila izračunana na 16,3 % in se je od začasne faze znatno zmanjšala.
On the basis of the above, the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty for the cooperating exporter is 16,3 %.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve za sodelujočega izvoznika 16,3 %.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margin found and given the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the duty definitively imposed by this Regulation.
Glede na razsežnost ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in glede na raven škode, povzročene industriji Unije, se zdi nujno, da bi se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, dokončno pobrali v obsegu zneska dajatve, dokončno uvedene s to uredbo.
Since the definitive duty is lower than the provisional duty, the amounts secured in excess of the definitive duty rate should be released,
Ker je dokončna dajatev nižja od začasne dajatve, bi bilo treba zneske, ki so zavarovani in presegajo dokončno stopnjo dajatve, sprostiti –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on certain ring binder mechanisms, currently falling within CN code ex83051000 (TARIC codes 8305100011, 8305100013, 8305100019, 8305100021, 8305100023, 8305100029, 8305100034, 8305100035 and 8305100036) originating in Thailand.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev za nekatere obročne mehanizme za vezavo, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex83051000 (oznake TARIC 8305100011, 8305100013, 8305100019, 8305100021, 8305100023, 8305100029, 8305100034, 8305100035 in 8305100036) s poreklom iz Tajske.
For the purpose of this Regulation, ring binder mechanisms shall consist of at least two steel sheets or wires with at least four half-rings made of steel wire fixed on them and which are kept together by a steel cover.
Za namene te uredbe so obročni mehanizmi za vezavo, ki sestojijo iz najmanj dveh jeklenih listov ali žic z najmanj štirimi polobroči iz jeklene žice, pritrjenimi na njej, ki jih skupaj drži jeklen ovitek.
They can be opened either by pulling the half rings or with a small steel trigger mechanism fixed to the ring binder mechanism.
Odpreti jih je mogoče s potegom polobročev ali z majhnim sprožilnim mehanizmom, pritrjenim na obročni mehanizem za vezavo.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 shall be 16,3 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelke iz odstavka 1, znaša 16,3 %.
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 118/2011 shall be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive duty imposed pursuant to Article 1 of this Regulation.
Zneski, ki so v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 118/2011 zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, se dokončno poberejo po stopnji dokončne dajatve, uvedene v skladu s členom 1 te uredbe.
The amounts secured in excess of the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo stopnjo dokončne protidampinške dajatve, se sprostijo.
OJ L 37, 11.2.2011, p. 2.
UL L 37, 11.2.2011, str. 2.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 793/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 793/2011
of 5 August 2011
z dne dne 5. avgusta 2011
establishing a prohibition of fishing in category 9 ‘pelagic freezer trawlers’ in the Mauritanian Economic Zone by vessels flying the flag of a Member State of the European Union
o prepovedi ribolova kategorije 9 „zamrzovalna plovila z vlečno mrežo za pelagični ribolov“ v mavretanski ekonomski coni s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo držav članic Evropske unije
Council Regulation (EC) No 704/2008 of 15 July 2008 on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for the period 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2012 [2] has limited the fishing opportunities for category 9 (pelagic freezer trawlers) to a reference tonnage of 250000 tonnes.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 704/2008 z dne 15. julija 2008 o sklenitvi Protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka v skladu s Sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo za obdobje od 1. avgusta 2008 do 31. julija 2012 [2] omejuje ribolovne možnosti za kategorijo 9 (zamrzovalna plovila z vlečno mrežo za pelagični ribolov) na referenčno tonažo 250000 ton.
Considering that on the basis of Article 2(3) of this aforementioned regulation, a supplementary a quota of 50000 tonnes has been allocated for the period from 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2011, bringing the total reference tonnage to 300000 tonnes.
Ob upoštevanju, da je bila v skladu s členom 2(3) navedene uredbe dodeljena dodatna kvota 50000 ton za obdobje od 1. avgusta 2010 do 31. julija 2011, s čimer se je referenčna tonaža povečala na 300000 ton.
According to the information received by the Commission, catches reported in this fishing category by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member States concerned have exhausted the quota for the above reference period.
Po podatkih, ki jih je prejela Komisija, so ulovi staleža, prijavljeni v tej ribolovni dejavnosti s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavami držav članic ali so registrirana v zadevnih državah članicah, izčrpali kvoto za navedeno obdobje.
It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for this fishing category.
Zato je treba ribolovne dejavnosti za navedeno kategorijo prepovedati –
The fishing quota allocated to the Member States concerned shall be deemed to be exhausted from 19 July 2011.
Ribolovna kvota, dodeljena zadevnim državam članicam, velja za izčrpano od 19. julija 2011.
OJ L 203, 31.7.2008, p. 1.
UL L 203, 31.7.2008, str. 1.
Fishing activities in category 9 by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member States concerned shall be prohibited from 19 July 2011 until 31 July 2011.
Ribolovne dejavnosti iz kategorije 9 s plovili, registriranimi v zadevnih državah članicah se prepove od 19. julija 2011 do 31. julija 2011.
In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish caught by those vessels during this period.
V tem obdobju je zlasti prepovedano obdržati na krovu, premeščati, pretovarjati ali iztovarjati ribe, ki jih ulovijo navedena plovila.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 794/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 794/2011
of 8 August 2011
z dne 8. avgusta 2011
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application for approval of amendments to the specification for the name ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Italije za odobritev sprememb specifikacije imena „Parmigiano Reggiano“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
Belgium, Denmark and the Association des Importateurs de fromage registered in Basel, Switzerland, objected to the registration pursuant to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Belgija, Danska in Združenje uvoznikov sira (Association des Importateurs de fromage) s sedežem v Baslu (Švica) so v skladu s členom 7(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 ugovarjali registraciji.