natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Specific requirements for the exchange of information between the competent authorities of the Member State of reference and the competent authorities of the host Member States of the AIFM should apply.
Veljati bi morale posebne zahteve za izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi organi referenčne države članice in pristojnimi organi države članice gostiteljice UAIS.
Further, the mediation procedure provided for in Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 should apply in case of disagreement between competent authorities of Member States on the determination of the Member State of reference, the application of the exemption in case of incompatibility between compliance with this Directive and compliance with equivalent rules of a third country, and the assessment regarding the fulfilment of the specific requirements concerning the third country of the non-EU AIFM and, as appropriate, the third country of the non-EU AIF.
Nadalje, v primeru nesoglasja med pristojnimi organi držav članic o določitvi referenčne države članice, o uporabi oprostitve v primeru nezdružljivosti med skladnostjo s to direktivo in skladnostjo z enakovrednimi pravili tretje države in o oceni glede izpolnitve posebnih zahtev v zvezi s tretjo državo ne-EU UAIS, in, kjer je to ustrezno ne-EU AIS, bi se moral uporabiti postopek posredovanja iz člena 19 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010.
ESMA should, on an annual basis, conduct a peer review analysis of the supervisory activities of the competent authorities in relation to the authorisation and the supervision of non-EU AIFMs, to further enhance consistency in supervisory outcomes, in accordance with Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
ESMA bi moral letno izvajati analizo medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov glede nadzornih dejavnosti pristojnih organov v zvezi z izdajo dovoljenj za in nadzorom nad ne-EU UAIS, da bi se dodatno okrepila doslednost nadzornih ugotovitev v skladu s členom 30 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010.
During a transitional period which will, in principle, taking into account ESMA’s advice, be brought to an end by means of a delegated act 3 years after the establishment of the passport for non-EU AIFMs, a non-EU AIFM intending to market AIFs in certain Member States only and without such a passport should also be permitted to do so by the relevant Member States, but only in so far as certain minimum conditions are met.
Med prehodnim obdobjem, ki bo načeloma ob upoštevanju mnenja ESMA, zaključeno z delegiranim aktom tri leta po uvedbi enotne licence za ne-EU UAIS, bi moralo biti ne-EU UAIS, ki želijo tržiti AIS le v določeni državi članici, vendar brez enotne licence, omogočeno, da to storijo z dovoljenjem zadevne države članice, vendar le v kolikor so izpolnjene določene minimalne zahteve.
Those non-EU AIFMs should be subject at least to rules similar to those applicable to EU AIFMs managing EU AIFs with respect to the disclosure to investors.
Za te ne-EU UAIS bi morala v zvezi z razkritjem vlagateljem, veljati najmanj pravila, podobna tistim, ki se uporabljajo za EU UAIS, ki upravljajo AIS.
In order to facilitate the monitoring of systemic risk those non-EU AIFMs should also be subject to reporting obligations vis-à-vis the competent authorities of the Member State in which AIFs are marketed.
Da se olajša nadzor sistemskega tveganja, bi morala za te ne-EU UAIS veljati tudi obveznost poročanja tistim pristojnim organom države članice, v kateri se tržijo AIS.
Such AIFMs should therefore comply with the transparency requirements laid down in this Directive and the obligations on AIFMs managing AIFs which acquire control of non-listed companies and issuers.
Zato bi moral tak UAIS ravnati v skladu z zahtevami po preglednosti, določenimi v tej direktivi in obveznostmi UAIS, ki upravljajo AIS, kateri obvladujejo družbe, ki ne kotirajo na borzi, in izdajatelji.
Further, appropriate cooperation arrangements for the purpose of systemic risk oversight and in line with international standards should be in place between the competent authorities of the Member States where the AIFs are marketed, if applicable, the competent authorities of the EU AIFs concerned and the supervisory authorities of the third country where the non-EU AIFM is established and, if applicable, the supervisory authorities of the third country where the non-EU AIF is established in order to ensure an efficient exchange of information that allows competent authorities of the relevant Member States to carry out their duties in accordance with this Directive.
Poleg tega bi morali biti med pristojnimi organi držav članic, kjer se AIS tržijo, če je to potrebno pristojnimi organi zadevnega EU AIS in nadzornimi organi tretje države, v kateri je ustanovljen ne-EU UAIS, in, če je potrebno, nadzornimi organi tretje države, v kateri je ustanovljen ne-EU AIS, vzpostavljeni ustrezni dogovori o sodelovanju za nadzor nad sistemskim tveganjem, ki so v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi, da se zagotovi učinkovita izmenjava informacij, ki pristojnim organom zadevnih držav članic omogoča, da opravljajo svoje dolžnosti v skladu s to direktivo.
The cooperation arrangements should not be used as a barrier to impede third country funds from being marketed in a Member State.
Dogovorov o sodelovanju se ne bi smelo uporabljati kot oviro, s katero bi se skladom tretjih držav preprečilo trženje v državi članici.
Finally, the third country where the non-EU AIFM or the non-EU AIF is established should not be listed as a Non-Cooperative Country and Territory by FATF.
Tretja država, v kateri je ustanovljen ne-EU UAIS ali ne-EU AIS, ne bi smela biti uvrščena na seznam s strani FATF, kot država ali ozemlje, ki ne sodeluje.
This Directive should not affect the current situation, whereby a professional investor established in the Union may invest in AIFs on its own initiative, irrespective of where the AIFM and/or the AIF is established.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na sedanje razmere, ko lahko profesionalni vlagatelj s sedežem v Uniji na lastno pobudo vlaga v AIS, ne glede na to, kje sta ustanovljena UAIS in/ali AIS.
Member States should be able to allow the marketing of all or certain types of AIFs managed by AIFMs to retail investors in their territory.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da na svojem ozemlju dovolijo trženje vseh ali nekaterih vrst AIS, ki jih upravljajo UAIS, malim vlagateljem.
If a Member State allows the marketing of certain types of AIF, the Member State should make an assessment on a case-by-case basis to determine whether a specific AIF should be considered as a type of AIF which may be marketed to retail investors in its territory.
Če država članica dovoli trženje nekaterih vrst AIS, bi morala oceniti vsak primer posebej, da določi, ali bi se posamičen AIS lahko štel za vrsto AIS, ki se lahko trži malim vlagateljem na njenem ozemlju.
Without prejudice to the application of other instruments of Union law, Member States should in such cases be able to impose stricter requirements on AIFs and AIFMs as a precondition for marketing to retail investors than is the case for AIFs marketed to professional investors in their territory, irrespective of whether such AIFs are marketed on a domestic or cross-border basis.
Brez poseganja v uporabo drugih instrumentov prava Unije bi moralo državam članicam biti omogočeno, da v takšnih primerih AIS in UAIS kot predpogoj za trženje malim vlagateljem naložijo strožje zahteve kakor za AIS, ki se tržijo profesionalnim vlagateljem na njihovem ozemlju, ne glede na to, ali se AIS tržijo v državi ali čezmejno.
Where a Member State allows the marketing of AIFs to retail investors in its territory, this possibility should be available regardless of the Member State where the AIFM managing the AIFs is established, and Member States should not impose stricter or additional requirements on EU AIFs established in another Member State and marketed on a cross-border basis than on AIFs marketed domestically.
Če država članica na svojem ozemlju dovoljuje trženje AIS malim vlagateljem, bi morala biti ta možnost na voljo ne glede na državo članico, v kateri je ustanovljen UAIS, ki upravlja AIS, in države članice ne bi smele naložiti strožjih ali dodatnih zahtev EU AIS, ki je ustanovljen v drugi državi članici in se tržijo čezmejno, glede na AIS, ki se tržijo v državi.
In addition, AIFMs, investment firms authorised under Directive 2004/39/EC and credit institutions authorised under Directive 2006/48/EC which provide investment services to retail clients should take into account any additional requirements when assessing whether a certain AIF is suitable or appropriate for an individual retail client or whether it is a complex or non-complex financial instrument.
Poleg tega bi morali UAIS, investicijska podjetja, ki imajo dovoljenje v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES, in kreditne institucije, ki imajo dovoljenje v skladu z Direktivo 2006/48/ES, katere nudijo investicijske storitve malim vlagateljem, upoštevati vse dodatne zahteve, ko ocenjujejo, ali je določen AIS ustrezen ali primeren za posameznega malega vlagatelja ali če je kompleksni ali ne-kompleksni finančni instrument.
It is necessary to clarify the powers and duties of the competent authorities responsible for implementing this Directive, and to strengthen the mechanisms necessary to ensure effective cross-border supervisory cooperation.
Treba je razjasniti pooblastila in dolžnosti pristojnih organov, odgovornih za izvajanje te direktive, ter okrepiti mehanizme, ki so potrebni za zagotavljanje učinkovitega čezmejnega sodelovanja pri nadzoru.
Under certain circumstances it should be possible for the competent authorities of the host Member States of an AIFM to take direct action to supervise compliance with provisions for which they are responsible.
V določenih okoliščinah bi moralo biti omogočeno, da pristojni organi države članice gostiteljice UAIS neposredno ukrepajo glede nadzorovanja upoštevanja določb, za katere so odgovorni.
For other provisions the competent authorities of the host Member States should under certain circumstances be allowed to request action from the competent authorities of the home Member State and to intervene if no such action is undertaken.
Kar zadeva druge določbe bi moralo biti pristojnim organom države članice gostiteljice pod določenimi pogoji dovoljeno, da od pristojnih organov matične države članice zahtevajo ukrepanje, in da sami posredujejo, če noben ukrep ni sprejet.
This Directive provides for a general coordinating role for ESMA, and the possibility of binding mediation procedures, chaired by ESMA, to resolve disputes between competent authorities.
Ta direktiva za ESMA predvideva splošno usklajevalno vlogo ter za rešitev sporov med pristojnimi organi, možnost zavezujočega postopka posredovanja, ki ga vodi ESMA.
ESMA should develop draft regulatory technical standards on the contents of the cooperation arrangements that must be concluded by the home Member State or by the Member State of reference of the AIFM and the relevant third-country supervisory authorities and on the procedures for the exchange of information.
ESMA bi moral pripraviti osnutek regulativnih tehničnih standardov o vsebini dogovorov o sodelovanju, ki jih morajo skleniti matična država članica oziroma referenčna država članica UAIS ter ustrezni nadzorni organi tretje države, ter o postopkih za izmenjavo informacij.
The draft regulatory technical standards should ensure that pursuant to those cooperation arrangements all necessary information is to be provided to enable the competent authorities of both the home and the host Member States to exercise their supervisory and investigatory powers under this Directive.
Osnutki regulativnih tehničnih standardov bi morali zagotoviti, da bi v skladu s temi dogovori o sodelovanju pristojnim organom tako matične države članice kot države članice gostiteljice posredovali vse potrebne informacije, da bi lahko izvajali svoja nadzorna in preiskovalna pooblastila skladu s to direktivo.
ESMA should also have a facilitating role in the negotiation and conclusion of the cooperation arrangements.
ESMA bi moral tudi imeti podporno vlogo pri pogajanjih in sklepanju dogovorov o sodelovanju.
For example, ESMA should be able to use its facilitating role by providing for a standard format for such cooperation arrangements.
To vlogo bi lahko na primer uporabil tako, da pripravi standardni format za take dogovore o sodelovanju.
Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Directive and ensure that they are implemented.
Države članice bi morale določiti kazni za kršitve določb te direktive in zagotoviti njihovo izvajanje.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised, in particular, in the TFEU and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Charter), in particular the right to the protection of personal data recognised in Article 16 TFEU and in Article 8 of the Charter.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in načela, priznana zlasti v PDEU in Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina), zlasti pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov iz člena 16 PDEU in člena 8 Listine.
Any exchange or transmission of information by competent authorities should be in accordance with the rules on the transfer of personal data as laid down in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [18].
Vsaka izmenjava ali prenos informacij pristojnih organov bi moral biti v skladu s pravili o prenosu osebnih podatkov iz Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [18].
Any exchange or transmission of information by ESMA should be in accordance with the rules on the transfer of personal data as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [19], which should be fully applicable to the processing of personal data for the purposes of this Directive.
Vsaka izmenjava ali prenos informacij ESMA bi moral biti v skladu s pravili o prenosu osebnih podatkov, kakor je določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [19], ki bi se moral v celoti uporabljati za obdelavo osebnih podatkov za namene te direktive.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev izvajanja te direktive, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers [20].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije [20].
The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU where expressly provided for in this Directive.
Komisijo bi bilo treba pooblastiti, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme delegirane akte, kadar je to izrecno določeno s to direktivo.
In particular, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts to specify the methods of leverage as defined in this Directive, including any financial and/or legal structures involving third parties controlled by the relevant AIF where those structures are specifically set up to directly or indirectly create leverage at the level of the AIF.
Zlasti bi morala biti pooblaščena za sprejetje delegiranih aktov za opredelitev metod finančnih vzvodov, kot so opredeljeni v tej direktivi, skupaj s finančnimi in/ali pravnimi strukturami, ki vključujejo tretje stranke, ki jih obvladujejo ustrezni AIS, pri čemer so te strukture tiste, ki so izrecno določene, da neposredno in posredno ustvarjajo finančne vzvode na ravni AIS.
In particular for private equity and venture capital funds this means that leverage that exists at the level of a portfolio company is not intended to be included when referring to such financial or legal structures.
Zlasti v skladih zasebnega kapitala in tveganega kapitala to pomeni, da finančni vzvodi, ki obstajajo na ravni portfeljske družbe niso namenjeni vključitvi pri sklicevanju na te finančne ali pravne strukture.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify how to calculate the thresholds for the lighter regime and how to treat AIFMs whose assets under management, including any assets acquired through use of leverage, in one and the same calendar year occasionally exceed and/or fall below the relevant threshold; to specify the obligations to register for the AIFMs falling below the thresholds and to provide information in order to effectively monitor systemic risk and the obligation for such AIFMs to notify the relevant competent authorities where they no longer fulfil the conditions for application of the lighter regime.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev izračuna pragov za blažji režim in obravnave UAIS, katerih upravljana sredstva, vključno s sredstvi, pridobljenimi s pomočjo finančnega vzvoda, v enem in istem koledarskem letu občasno presegajo in/ali padejo pod ustrezni prag; za opredelitev obveznosti registracije za UAIS, ki ne dosegajo praga, in dajanja informacij, da se učinkovito nadzoruje sistemsko tveganje; ter opredelitev obveznosti teh UAIS, da uradno obvestijo zadevne pristojne organe, kadar ne izpolnjujejo več pogojev za blažji režim.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to clarify the methods of leverage, including any financial and/or legal structures involving third parties controlled by the relevant AIF and how leverage is to be calculated; to specify the risks the additional own funds or the professional indemnity insurance must cover, the conditions for determining the appropriateness of additional own funds or the coverage of the professional indemnity insurance, and the manner of determining ongoing adjustments of the additional own funds or of the coverage of the professional indemnity insurance.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi, da se pojasnijo metode finančnega vzvoda, vključno s finančnimi in/ali pravnimi strukturami, ki vključujejo tretje stranke, ki jih obvladujejo ustrezni AIS, in kako naj se izračuna finančni vzvod; da se opredelijo tveganja, ki jih morajo kriti dodatna lastna sredstva ali zavarovanje poklicne odgovornosti; pogoji za določanje ustreznosti dodatnih lastnih sredstev ali zavarovanja poklicne odgovornosti; in način za določanje tekočih prilagajanj dodatnih lastnih sredstev ali kritja zavarovanja poklicne odgovornosti.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the criteria to be used by competent authorities to assess whether AIFMs comply with their obligations as regards their conduct of business, their obligation to act in the best interests of the AIFs or the investors of the AIFs they manage and the integrity of the market; to have and employ effectively the resources and procedures that are necessary for the proper performance of their business activities; to take all reasonable steps to avoid conflicts of interest and, where such conflicts cannot be avoided, to identify, manage and monitor, and where applicable, disclose, those conflicts of interest in order to prevent them from adversely affecting the interests of the AIFs and their investors and to ensure that the AIFs they manage are fairly treated; to comply with all regulatory requirements applicable to the conduct of their business activities so as to promote the best interests of the AIFs or the investors of the AIFs they manage and the integrity of the market; and to treat all AIF investors fairly.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev meril, ki bi jih pristojni organi uporabljali za oceno, ali UAIS izpolnjujejo obveznosti v zvezi z vodenjem poslov, njihovo obveznostjo, da delujejo v najboljšem interesu AIS ali vlagateljev AIS, ki jih upravljajo, in integritete trga; da imajo in učinkovito uporabljajo vire in postopke, ki so potrebni za pravilno opravljanje poslovnih dejavnosti; da sprejmejo vse razumne ukrepe za preprečitev nasprotja interesov, če pa se jim ni mogoče izogniti, za to, da se ta nasprotja ugotovijo, upravljajo in spremljajo, in da se po potrebi o njih obvesti, da ne bi negativno vplivala na interese AIS in njegovih vlagateljev ter za zagotovitev, da so AIS, ki jih upravlja, obravnavani pošteno; da izpolnjujejo vse predpisane zahteve, ki veljajo za izvajanje poslovnih dejavnosti, tako da spodbujajo najboljše interese AIS ali vlagateljev v AIS, ki jih upravljajo, in integriteto trga; in da vse vlagatelje v AIS obravnavajo pošteno.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the type of conflicts of interest AIFMs have to identify, as well as the reasonable steps AIFMs are expected to take in terms of structures and organisational and administrative procedures in order to identify, prevent, manage, monitor and disclose conflicts of interest.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev vrste nasprotij interesov, ki jih morajo UAIS ugotoviti, pa tudi razumne ukrepe, ki bi jih morali UAIS sprejeti, glede struktur in organizacijskih ter upravnih postopkov za ugotovitev, preprečevanje, obvladovanje, nadzor in obveščanje o nasprotjih interesov.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the risk management functions to be employed; the appropriate frequency for review of the risk management system; how the risk management function should be functionally and hierarchically separated from the operating units, including the portfolio management function; the specific safeguards against conflicts of interest; and the risk management requirements to be employed by AIFMs.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev funkcij obvladovanja tveganja, ki naj se uporabijo; ustrezne pogostosti pregledovanja sistema obvladovanja tveganja; kako naj se naloga obvladovanja tveganja funkcionalno in hierarhično loči od delujočih enot, vključno z nalogami upravljanja premoženja; specifičnih varoval pred nasprotji interesov; in zahtev glede obvladovanja tveganja, ki naj jih uveljavi UAIS.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the liquidity management systems and procedures that AIFMs should employ and the alignment of the investment strategy, liquidity profile and redemption policy.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev sistemov in postopkov upravljanja likvidnosti, ki bi jih UAIS morali uporabiti, ter za uskladitev naložbene strategije, profila likvidnosti in politike glede zahteve po izplačilu.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the requirements that the originators, the sponsors or the original lenders of securitisation instruments have to meet in order for an AIFM to be allowed to invest in such instruments issued after 1 January 2011.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev zahtev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati originatorji, sponzorji ali prvotni posojilodajalci instrumentov listinjenja, da ima UAIS dovoljenja za vlaganje v takšne instrumente, izdane po 1. januarju 2011.