natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Amounts in excess of EUR 40 per test are incompatible with the internal market and must be recovered, with the exception of aid granted to specific projects which, at the time the aid was granted, met all the conditions set in the applicable de minimis Regulation.
Zneski, ki presegajo 40 EUR na test, niso združljivi z notranjim trgom in jih je treba vrniti, razen pomoči za posebne projekte, ki so ob dodelitvi izpolnjevale vse pogoje iz veljavne uredbe o pomočeh de minimis.
Belgium unlawfully implemented aid to finance BSE tests in breach of Article 108(3) of the TFEU during the period from 1 January 2001 to 30 June 2004.
Belgija je v obdobju od 1. januarja 2001 do 30. junija 2004 nezakonito izvajala pomoč za financiranje testov na BSE v nasprotju s členom 108(3) PDEU.
Belgium shall take all necessary measures to recover the unlawful and incompatible aid referred to in Article 1(3) and (4) from its beneficiaries.
Belgija sprejme potrebne ukrepe za izterjavo nezakonitih in nezdružljivih pomoči iz člena 1(3) in (4) od prejemnikov teh pomoči.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest calculated from the date on which it was placed at the disposal of the beneficiaries until the date of its recovery.
Pomoči, ki jih je treba vrniti, vključujejo obresti od datuma, ko so bile dane na razpolago prejemnikom, do datuma njihovega vračila.
Recovery shall be effected without delay in accordance with the procedures provided for in national law, provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of this Decision.
Vračilo se opravi takoj in v skladu s postopki nacionalnega prava, če ti omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvršitev tega sklepa.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1(3) and (4) shall be immediate and effective.
Vračilo pomoči iz člena 1(3) in (4) se izvede takoj in učinkovito.
Belgium shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within 4 months of the date of its notification.
Belgija zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih od datuma njegove priglasitve.
Within 2 months of notification of this Decision, Belgium shall submit the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih po priglasitvi tega sklepa Belgija predloži Komisiji naslednje informacije:
a list of beneficiaries who received the aid referred to in Article 1(3) and (4) and the total amount of aid received by each one;
seznam prejemnikov, ki so prejeli pomoč na podlagi člena 1(3) in (4) in skupni znesek pomoči, ki ga je prejel vsak izmed njih;
a detailed description of the measures already taken or planned to comply with this Decision;
podroben opis že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s tem sklepom;
documents demonstrating that orders to return the aid have been sent to the beneficiaries.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo prejemniku pomoči naročeno, naj vrne pomoč.
Belgium shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1(3) and (4) has been completed.
Belgija obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se vračanje pomoči iz člena 1(3) in (4) ne konča.
After the 2-month period referred to in paragraph 1, Belgium shall submit, at the Commission’s request, a report on the measures already taken and those planned to comply with this Decision.
Po dvomesečnem obdobju iz odstavka 1 Belgija na zahtevo Komisije predloži poročilo o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
That report shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
V tem poročilu navede tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih vračila, ki so jih prejemniki že vrnili.
From 1 December 2009 Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have respectively become Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
S 1. decembrom 2009 sta člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES postala člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
In both cases the provisions are identical in substance.
V obeh primerih so določbe v bistvu enake.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU shall be understood as being to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty.
Za namene tega sklepa se sklicevanja na člena 107 in 108 PDEU po potrebi razumejo kot sklicevanja na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES.
OJ C 11, 16.1.2009, p. 8.
UL C 11, 16.1.2009, str. 8.
Only the aspects relevant to the final decision will be included here — the other aspects are included in the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure.
Povzemamo samo podatke, pomembne za končno odločitev – ostali podatki so povzeti v odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
Regarding the compulsory tests, the Belgian authorities refer to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (OJ L 147, 31.5.2001, p. 1).
Belgijski organi se pri obveznih testih sklicujejo na Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 999/2001 z dne 22. maja 2001 o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij. UL L 147, 31.5.2001, str. 1.
State aid No N 21/02 — Belgium — Acceptance of costs of compulsory BSE tests.
Državna pomoč št. N 21/02 – Belgija – Kritje stroškov obveznih testov na BSE.
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, Belgium is undertaking rapid tests for BSE on all bovines over 30 months old presented for slaughter and on all bovines over 24 months old slaughtered by necessity.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 999/2001 Belgija opravlja hitre teste za odkrivanje BSE pri govedu, starejšem od 30 mesecev, pripeljanem v klavnico, ter pri govedu, starejšem od 24 mesecev in zaklanem v sili.
Since 1 July 2001 all carcases of bovines over 24 months old have also been subject to a BSE test.
Od 1. julija 2001 se na BSE testira tudi vsako truplo goveda, starejšega od 24 mesecev.
Belgian Official Gazette of 8.11.2004, p. 75290.
Moniteur belge, 8.11.2004, str. 75290.
In accordance with the TSE guidelines, total public aid must not exceed EUR 40 from 1 January 2003.
V skladu s Smernicami TSE od 1. januarja 2003 skupna javna pomoč ne sme preseči 40 EUR.
See table at recital 25 of the Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Glej preglednico v uvodni izjavi 25 odločitve o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
OJ C 105, 30.4.2005, p. 3.
UL C 105, 30.4.2005, str. 3.
Belgian Official Gazette, 21.11.2005 p. 49941.
Moniteur belge, 21.11.2005, str. 49941.
Belgian Official Gazette, 21.11.2005 p. 49918.
Moniteur belge, 21.11.2005, str. 49918.
General Court judgment of 18 December 2008, Government of Gibraltar (T-211/04) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (T-215/04) v Commission of the European Communities [2008] II-3745, points 143-146.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 18. decembra 2008 v združenih zadevah Vlada Gibraltarja in Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska proti Komisiji (T-211/04 in T-215/04, ZOdl., str. II-3745, točke od 143 do 146).
To illustrate this Belgium quotes Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules, where Article 27 and Annexes IV and V oblige Member States to organise the collection of fees to finance certain controls.
Belgija kot primer navaja Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali, katere člen 27 ter prilogi IV in V določajo, da morajo države članice zagotoviti pobiranje pristojbine za financiranje nekaterih nadzorov.
Court judgment of 20 November 2003 Case C-126/01 Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie v GEMO SA [2003] I-13769.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 20. novembra 2003 v zadevi Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie proti GEMO SA (C-126/01, Recueil, str. I-13769).
Court judgments of 11 March 1992, Joined Cases C-78/90, C-79/90, C-80/90, C-81/90, C-82/90 and C-83/90 Compagnie commerciale de l’Ouest e.a. v Receveur principal des douanes de La Pallice Port [1992] I-1847, point 35; of 2 August 1993, Case C-266/91 Celulose Beira Industrial SA v Fazenda Pública [1993] I-4337, point 21; of 11 June 1992, Joined Cases C-149/91 and C-150/91 Sanders Adour e.a. v Directeur des services fiscaux des Pyrenées-Atlantiques [1992] I-3899, point 27, and of 16 December 1992, Case C-17/91 Lornoy v État belge [1992] I-6523, point 32.
Sodbe Sodišča z dne 11. marca 1992 v združenih zadevah Compagnie commerciale de l’Ouest in drugi proti Receveur principal des douanes de La Pallice Port (C-78/90, C-79/90, C-80/90, C-81/90, C-82/90 in C-83/90, Recueil, str. I-1847, točka 35); z dne 2. avgusta 1993 v zadevi Celulose Beira Industrial SA proti Fazenda Pública (C-266/91, Recueil, str. I-4337, točka 21); z dne 11. junija 1992 v združenih zadevah Sanders Adour in drugi proti Directeur des services fiscaux des Pyrenées-Atlantiques (C-149/91 in C-150/91, Recueil, str. I-3899, točka 27) in z dne 16. decembra 1992 v zadevi Lornoy proti État belge (C-17/91, Recueil, str. I-6523, točka 32).
These contributions and fees were approved by decision N 9/05 and N 10/05.
Ti prispevki in plačila so bili odobreni z Odločbo N 9/05 in N 10/05.
These costs include laboratory costs, the costs of veterinarians carrying out the analyses on behalf of the public authority, and the sampling kits.
Ti stroški vključujejo stroške laboratorija, stroške veterinarjev, ki po naročilu javnega organa opravljajo analize, in stroške kompletov za odvzem vzorcev.
Source: www.birb.be
Vir: www.birb.be
MB of 18.2.2000, p. 5053.
Moniteur belge, 18.2.2000, str. 5053.
See Article 10 of the Law of 4 February 2000.
Glej člen 10 zakona z dne 4. februarja 2000.
MB of 24.3.1954, p. 2210.
Moniteur belge, 24.3.1954, str. 2210.
See in particular recital 73 of Decision N 9/05 and N 10/2005 which states that ‘the Commission has always considered that the financing by the State of the costs of the obligatory controls directly linked to production or to the placing on the market of a product constitutes a selective advantage benefiting those enterprises’.
Glej zlasti uvodno izjavo 73 Odločbe N 9/05 in N 10/2005, v kateri je navedeno, da je „Komisija vedno menila, da je državno financiranje stroškov obveznih pregledov, ki so neposredno povezani s proizvodnjo ali dajanjem proizvoda na trg, selektivna prednost za ta podjetja“.
See the TSE guidelines, e.g. points 7 and 12.
Glej Smernice TSE, npr. točki 7 in 12.
Belgium has a share of 2,1 % in agricultural production in EU in 2004 (source: Agriculture in the EU — Statistical and economic information 2005).
Leta 2004 je imela Belgija 2,1-odstotni delež v kmetijski proizvodnji Unije (vir: L’agriculture dans l’UE-Informations statistiques et économiques 2005).
According to the case law of the Court of Justice, improvement in the competitive position of an undertaking resulting from a State aid generally points to a distortion of competition compared with other competing undertakings not receiving such assistance, (Judgment of the Court of 17 September 1980, Philip Morris Holland BV/Commission (Case C-730/79, ECR 1980, p. 2671, paragraphs 11 and 12).
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča krepitev konkurenčnega položaja nekega podjetja, ko mu je bila podeljena državna pomoč, v splošnem kaže na izkrivljanje konkurence glede na druga konkurenčna podjetja, ki niso bila upravičena do te pomoči (sodba Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevi Philip Morris Holland BV proti Komisiji (C-730/79, Recueil, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12)).
Judgment of the Court of 13 January 2005, Streekgewest Westelijk Noord-Brabant/Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-174/02, ECR 2005, p. I 85), paragraph 25.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 13. januarja 2005 v zadevi Streekgewest Westelijk Noord-Brabant proti Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-174/02, ZOdl., str. I-85, točka 25).
Streekgewest Judgment, cited above in the footnote on page 36, paragraph 26, Judgment of the Court of 27 October 2005, Nazairdis SAS e.a./Caisse nationale de l’organisation autonome d’assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic) (Joined Cases C-266/04 to C-270/04, C-276/04 and C-321/04 to C-325/04, ECR 2005, p. I-9481), paragraphs 46 to 49.
Sodba Streekgewest, navedena v opombi 36, točka 26, sodba Sodišča z dne 27. oktobra 2005 v združenih zadevah Nazairdis SAS in drugi proti Caisse nationale de l’organisation autonome d’assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic) (od C-266/04 do C-270/04, C-276/04 in od C-321/04 do C-325/04, ZOdl., str. I-9481, točke od 46 do 49).
Judgments of the Court of 15 June 2006, Air Liquide/Ville de Seraing et Province de Liège (Joined Cases C-393/04 and C 41/05, ECR. 2006, p. I-5293), paragraph 46, and Streekgewest, cited above in the footnote on page 36, paragraph 28.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. junija 2006 v združenih zadevah Air Liquide proti Ville de Seraing et Province de Liège (C-393/04 in C-41/05, ZOdl., str. I-5293, točka 46) in sodba Streekgewest, navedena v opombi 36, točka 28.
Judgment of the Court of 25 June 1970, France v Commission (47/69, ECR 1970, p. 487), paragraph 17, 20 and 21.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 25. junija 1970 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (47/69, Recueil, str. 487, točke 17, 20 in 21).
See recitals 100 et seq. of Decision N 9/05 and N 10/05.
Glej uvodno izjavo 100 in naslednje Odločbe N 9/05 in N 10/05.
See point 194(c) of the 2007-13 agricultural guidelines.
Glej točko 194(c) Kmetijskih smernic 2007–2013.
See Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.
Glej Uredbo (ES) št. 999/2001.
Judgment of the Court of 4 April 1995 in Case C-348/93 Commission v Italy [1995] ECR I-673, paragraph 27.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 4. aprila 1995 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji (C-348/93, Recueil, str. I-673, točka 27).
Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Člen 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999.
That extension was granted by letter of 13 January 2009.
Ta rok je bil odobren z dopisom z dne 13. januarja 2009.
Belgium provided comments by letter of 25 February 2009, registered on 6 March 2009.
Belgija je pripombe poslala z dopisom z dne 25. februarja 2009, evidentiranim 6. marca 2009.
Following those meetings, additional information was sent by Belgium on 14 December 2009, registered on 16 December 2009.
Na podlagi teh sestankov je Belgija z dopisom z dne 14. decembra 2009, evidentiranim 16. decembra 2009, poslala dodatne informacije.
Following the simultaneous enquiry by the Belgian competition authorities concerning possible agreements between the laboratories, reply deadline extension requests were submitted by Belgium on 21 January 2010, 29 September 2010 and 17 January 2011.
Belgija je zaradi istočasne preiskave, ki so jo izvajali belgijski organi za konkurenco v zvezi z morebitnimi dogovori med laboratoriji, 21. januarja 2010, 29. septembra 2010 in 17. januarja 2011 prosila za podaljšanje rokov.
A last request for information was sent by the Commission on 22 February 2011, to which the Belgian authorities responded by letter of 6 April 2011.
Komisija je 22. februarja 2011 poslala zadnji zahtevek za posredovanje informacij, na katerega so belgijski organi odgovorili z dopisom z dne 6. aprila 2011.
The Commission granted an additional extension to enable Belgium to answer the questions pending the outcome of the enquiry by the Belgian competition authorities.
Komisija je odobrila dodatno podaljšanje roka, da bi Belgija v odgovorih lahko upoštevala rezultate preiskave svojih organov za konkurenco.
The Belgian authorities stated that this new draft royal decree was an amendment to the draft royal decree notified in 2001 by Belgium and approved by the Commission by Decision N 21/02 of 13 February 2002 [6], as well as to another draft discussed informally with the Commission in 2003.
Belgijski organi so navedli, da novi osnutek kraljevega odloka spreminja osnutek kraljevega odloka, ki ga je Belgija priglasila leta 2001 in Komisija odobrila z Odločbo N 21/02 z dne 13. februarja 2002 [6], ter drugi osnutek, o katerem so s Komisijo neformalno razpravljali leta 2003.
Neither of those two drafts had been implemented, however, and the decree notified in 2004 constituted their recasting.
Vendar se ta dva osnutka nista izvajala in sta bila spremenjena z odlokom, priglašenim leta 2004.
As stated in points 19 et seq. of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure, the measure exempted under number XA 53/04 covers the prefinancing of the BSE tests [13] with a maximum aid intensity of EUR 40 per test, and was implemented on 1 January 2003.
Kot je navedeno v točki 19 in naslednjih točkah odločitve o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, se je ukrep, ki je bil oproščen pod številko XA 53/04 in je pokrival vnaprejšnje plačilo testov na BSE [13], pri čemer je bila največja intenzivnost pomoči 40 EUR na test, začel izvajati 1. januarja 2003.
The legal basis for this measure is the Law of 27 December 2002 on the general budget of expenditure for 2003.
Pravna podlaga za ta ukrep je zakon z dne 27. decembra 2002 o izdatkih iz splošnega proračuna za leto 2003.
The measure exempted under number XA 54/04 provides for a maximum aid intensity of EUR 33,38 per test, and was implemented on 15 October 2004.
Ukrep, ki je bil oproščen pod številko XA 54/04, določa, da je največja intenzivnost pomoči 33,38 EUR na test, in se je začel izvajati 15. oktobra 2004.
This aid measure is of indeterminate duration.
Ta ukrep ni časovno omejen.
Both these Royal Decrees entered into force on 1 January 2006.
Navedena kraljeva odloka sta začela veljati 1. januarja 2006.
The Royal Decree on contributions provides for the repeal of the Royal Decree of 15 October 2004 referred to in recital 21.
V kraljevem odloku o prispevkih je predvidena razveljavitev kraljevega odloka z dne 15. oktobra 2004, navedenega v uvodni izjavi 21.
On 27 February 2009 Belgium commented in reply to the Commission’s doubts expressed in its decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure.
Komisija je pripombe Belgije, s katerimi odgovarja na dvome, ki jih je Komisija navedla v odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, prejela 27. februarja 2009.
These comments can be summarised as follows:
Povzeti jih je mogoče v naslednjih točkah:
These contributions are also designed to reimburse the costs of the BSE tests prefinanced since 1 January 2002.
Ti prispevki so namenjeni tudi povračilu stroškov testov na BSE, ki so bili plačani vnaprej od 1. januarja 2002.
The fee was then indexed at EUR 11,07 from 1 January 2008.
Nato je bil od 1. januarja 2008 znesek plačila popravljen na 11,07 EUR.
Here Belgium refers to decision N 9/05 and N 10/05 which indicated that only EUR 33,38 of the EUR 44,08 total cost represented State aid. The other EUR 10,70 was not State aid and was therefore subtracted from the price of the test during the evaluation of its conformity with the maximum aid intensity of EUR 40 per test.
Belgija se v zvezi s tem sklicuje na Odločbo N 9/05 in N 10/05, v kateri je bilo navedeno, da je državna pomoč samo 33,38 EUR od skupne cene 44,08 EUR. Znesek 10,70 EUR ni državna pomoč, zato je bil pri oceni skladnosti z največjo intenzivnostjo pomoči 40 EUR na test odštet od cene testa.
The legislation in force at the time (that is, chiefly the Law of 4 February 2000 on the creation of the FASFC [27]) indicated that the FASFC was financed mainly by revenue sources such as the product of duties, charges and fees, the products of administrative fines, occasional revenue, gifts and legacies, etc. [28].
Zakonodaja, ki je takrat veljala (predvsem zakon z dne 4. februarja 2000 o ustanovitvi Zvezne agencije za varnost prehranjevalne verige [27], je določala, da se ta agencija financira iz različnih virov, kot so prihodki iz dajatev, taks in plačil, upravne globe, priložnostni prihodki, darila in volila [28].
The FASFC is a public institution with legal status, classed as Category A under the Law of 16 March 1954 on the supervision of certain bodies of public interest [29].
Zvezna agencija za varnost prehranjevalne verige je javna ustanova, ki je pravna oseba in je uvrščena v kategorijo A, določeno z zakonom z dne 16. marca 1954 o nadzoru nad določenimi organizacijami v javnem interesu [29].
However, in light of the information provided by Belgium following the initiation of the formal investigation procedure, it emerged that the revenue from the contributions was used in part in 2005 and 2006 to reimburse the pre-financing of the BSE tests exceeding EUR 40 during the period from 1 January 2003 to 1 December 2004.
Vendar se je ob upoštevanju podatkov, ki jih je Belgija predložila po sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, izkazalo, da je bil del prihodkov iz prispevkov v letih 2005 in 2006 uporabljen za povračilo vnaprej plačanih testov na BSE, ki so presegli 40 EUR, v obdobju od 1. januarja 2003 do 1. decembra 2004.
However, this had not been mentioned in Decision N 9/05 and N 10/05.
To pa v Odločbi N 9/05 in N 10/05 ni bilo navedeno.
If such a hypothecation exists, the revenue from the tax directly influences the amount of the aid [36] and, consequently, the assessment of the compatibility of this aid with the internal market.
Če taka vez obstaja, prihodki od takse neposredno vplivajo na višino pomoči [36] in posledično na presojo združljivosti te pomoči z notranjim trgom.
They applied between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 [42].
Te smernice so se uporabljale od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2006 [42].
Point 44 of the TSE guidelines provides that, except for cases relating in particular to BSE tests, unlawful aid within the meaning of Article 1(f) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 is to be examined in accordance with the rules and guidelines applicable at the time the aid was granted.
V točki 44 Smernic TSE je določeno, da se bodo nezakonite pomoči v smislu člena 1(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, razen primerov, ki se nanašajo zlasti na teste na BSE, obravnavale v skladu s pravili in smernicami, ki so veljale ob dodelitvi pomoči.
As regards the condition concerning the maximum amount of EUR 40 per test, the Commission notes that this limit was exceeded between 1 January 2003 and 30 June 2004.
V zvezi s pogojem, da je najvišji znesek 40 EUR na test, Komisija ugotavlja, da je bil ta najvišji znesek med 1. januarjem 2003 in 30. junijem 2004 presežen.
According to the information provided by Belgium, the total amount of the excess payments during this period was EUR 6619810,74. From 1 July 2004, the total cost of the test was below EUR 40 (see recital 64).
Po podatkih, ki jih je predložila Belgija, je skupni presežni znesek v tem obdobju 6619810,74 EUR. Po 1. juliju 2004 je skupni strošek testa nižji od 40 EUR (glej uvodno izjavo 64).
This aid is compatible for the period from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002 and from 1 July 2004 to 31 December 2005.
Ta pomoč je združljiva v obdobjih od 1. januarja 2001 do 31. decembra 2002 ter od 1. julija 2004 do 31. decembra 2005.
It is incompatible for the period from 1 January 2003 to 30 June 2004.
Ta pomoč ni združljiva v obdobju od 1. januarja 2003 do 30. junija 2004.
The incompatible portion of the aid consists of the amount in excess of EUR 40 per test and has been assessed by Belgium as EUR 6619810,74.
Nezdružljivo pomoč sestavlja znesek, ki presega 40 EUR na test in po oceni Belgije znaša 6619810,74 EUR.
The Commission notes that Belgium unlawfully implemented aid to finance BSE tests in breach of Article 108(3) of the TFEU during the period from 1 January 2001 to 30 June 2004.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Belgija v obdobju od 1. januarja 2001 do 30. junija 2004 nezakonito izvajala pomoč za financiranje testov na BSE v nasprotju s členom 108(3) PDEU.