natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Polish authorities informed the Commission that the relevant permits and certificates (points 16 and 17) enable goods and services of specific quality to be supplied to special customers (enterprises of particular significance to the defence of the state and the Ministry of Defence).
Poljski organi so Komisijo obvestili, da ustrezna dovoljenja in potrdila (točki 16 in 17) omogočajo dobavo blaga in storitev posebne kakovosti posebnim strankam (podjetjem posebnega pomena za obrambo države in ministrstvu za obrambo).
PZL Wrocław (PZL Hydral in the past) does not just supply components of hydraulic systems, fuel systems and control systems; repairs to installed sub-assemblies are crucial to the functioning of the aircraft operated by the Polish armed forces (W-3, Mi-2, M28 Bryza and PZL 130 Orlik); the Polish authorities also emphasised that the W-3 and Mi-2 are the main helicopters used by the Polish army.
Podjetje PZL Wrocław (prej PZL Hydral) ni le dobavitelj sestavnih delov hidravličnih sistemov, sistemov za gorivo in krmilnih sistemov; popravila nameščenih podsklopov so bistvena za delovanje zrakoplovov, ki jih uporabljajo poljske oborožene sile (W-3, Mi-2, M28 Bryza in PZL 130 Orlik); poljski organi so še poudarili, da poljska vojska uporablja predvsem helikopterje W-3 in Mi-2.
The goods produced by PZL Hydral for the use of the armed forces have the corresponding NATO code under the NATO Standardisation Agreement and the company itself has a NATO code.
Blago, ki ga podjetje PZL Hydral proizvaja za uporabo v oboroženih silah, in tudi samo podjetje nosita ustrezno oznako NATO na podlagi standardizacijskega sporazuma organizacije NATO.
Financial relationships between PZL Hydral and PZL Wrocław
Finančno razmerje med podjetjema PZL Hydral in PZL Wrocław
As explained above in point 9 et seq., as of December 2004 PZL Hydral transferred assets to PZL Wrocław.
Kot je pojasnjeno v točki 9 in naslednjih, je podjetje PZL Hydral decembra 2004 preneslo sredstva na podjetje PZL Wrocław.
Only the assets transferred on 30 December 2007 (real estate) were encumbered by mortgages in favour of public creditors.
Le sredstva, ki so bila prenesena 30. decembra 2007 (nepremičnine), so bila obremenjena s hipotekami v korist javnih upnikov.
The Polish authorities confirmed that since it started operating PZL Wrocław has settled all its liabilities vis-à-vis public creditors on time, including social security contributions and taxes for its employees.
Poljski organi so potrdili, da je podjetje PZL Wrocław od začetka poslovanja vedno pravočasno poravnalo vse svoje obveznosti do javnih upnikov, vključno s prispevki za socialno varnost in davki za zaposlene.
Financial difficulties of PZL Hydral
Finančne težave podjetja PZL Hydral
PZL Hydral started to have difficulties in repaying liabilities to both its private and public creditors in 1998.
Podjetje PZL Hydral se je leta 1998 srečalo s prvimi težavami pri odplačevanju obveznosti do zasebnih in javnih upnikov.
Liabilities vis-à-vis private creditors
Obveznosti do zasebnih upnikov
At the end of 1998, PZL Hydral's private liabilities vis-à-vis banks and suppliers amounted to PLN 90,4 million.
Zasebne obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do bank in dobaviteljev so ob koncu leta 1998 znašale 90,4 milijona PLN.
The bulk of these debts were owed to two banks: Bank […] [8] and Bank […].
Večino tega dolga je podjetje dolgovalo dvema bankama: banki […] [8] in banki […].
Changes in the total amount owed by PZL Hydral to […] (PLN thousand)
Spremembe celotnega zneska, ki ga je podjetje PZL Hydral dolgovalo […] (v tisoč PLN)
These private banks had first-rank collateral (see detailed description in points 32 and 34 below) and could have easily enforced their claims on the basis of bank enforcement orders.
Ti zasebni banki sta imeli prvovrstno zavarovanje (glej podroben opis v točkah 32 in 34 spodaj) in bi lahko na podlagi bančnega izvršilnega naloga svoje terjatve preprosto uveljavili.
Under the 1997 Banking Act [9], banks can issue bank enforcement orders on the basis of their records or other documents relating to banking transactions.
Banke lahko v skladu z zakonom o bančništvu iz leta 1997 [9] na podlagi svojih evidenc ali drugih dokumentov v zvezi z bančnimi transakcijami izdajajo bančne izvršilne naloge.
A bank enforcement order can serve as a basis for enforcement after the court has attached an enforceability clause to it.
Bančni izvršilni nalog se lahko uporabi kot podlaga za izterjavo, ko mu sodišče doda klavzulo o izterljivosti.
This is a much quicker way than is the case for other creditors, who must apply to the competent court prior to enforcement for a decision to be handed down.
To je veliko hitrejša metoda kot pri drugih upnikih, ki morajo pristojno sodišče pred izterjavo zaprositi za izdajo sklepa.
Despite this, the private creditors have not taken any forced enforcement action; in other words, they have not applied for bankruptcy proceedings to be instituted against PZL Hydral and nor have they taken any other action to enforce their claims against the assets.
Kljub temu zasebni upniki niso sprejeli ukrepov prisilne izterjave; povedano drugače, niso zaprosili za uvedbo stečajnega postopka nad podjetjem PZL Hydral niti niso sprejeli drugih ukrepov za uveljavitev svojih terjatev v zvezi s sredstvi.
When PZL Hydral experienced difficulties in repaying its loans in 1998-2006, the banks could, under the Civil Code, have charged it statutory interest at a rate determined by the Cabinet, as shown in Table 7.
Ko je imelo podjetje PZL Hydral v obdobju 1998–2006 težave pri odplačevanju posojil, bi mu lahko banki na podlagi civilnega zakonika zaračunali zakonite obresti po obrestni meri, kot jo je določila vlada in je prikazana v preglednici 7.
However, instead of charging this interest systematically, at times they merely charged interest at the rates shown in Table 5 and Table 6.
Vendar banki nista sistematično zaračunavali teh obresti, ampak sta to storili le občasno in po obrestnih merah, navedenih v preglednicah 5 in 6.
Interest rates charged by Bank […] (USD loans based on LIBOR)
Obrestne mere, ki jih je zaračunala banka […] (posojila v USD na podlagi obrestne mere LIBOR)
Interest rates charged by […] (USD loans based on LIBOR)
Obrestne mere, ki jih je zaračunala banka […] (posojila v USD na podlagi obrestne mere LIBOR)
Statutory interest rates
Zakonite obrestne mere
The Polish authorities argue that these banks thought that they would receive a higher return if they contributed to the restructuring process of PZL Hydral.
Poljski organi trdijo, da sta bili banki prepričani, da bosta dosegli večje donose, če bosta prispevali k procesu prestrukturiranja podjetja PZL Hydral.
They closely followed negotiations with the first company that showed an interest in acquiring PZL Wrocław, namely […] (see point 57 et seq.).
Natančno sta spremljali pogajanja s prvim podjetjem, ki je izrazilo zanimanje za nakup podjetja PZL Wrocław, tj. […] (glej točko 57 in naslednje).
The banks regularly monitored the economic situation of PZL Hydral on the basis of its financial reports, visits to its premises and market analysis.
Na podlagi finančnih poročil podjetja PZL Hydral, obiskov v njegovih poslovnih prostorih in tržne analize sta redno spremljali njegov gospodarski položaj.
The write-offs resulting from the settlement agreement were entered in PZL Hydral's books for the 2004 financial year.
Odpisi na podlagi sporazuma o poravnavi so bili vneseni v poslovne knjige podjetja PZL Hydral za finančno leto 2004.
Bank […] agreed to settle on the basis of its own economic assessment despite holding first-rank priority mortgages.
Banka […] je na podlagi lastne ekonomske ocene pristala na poravnavo, čeprav je imela prvovrstne prednostne hipoteke.
In particular, the bank secured its credit by establishing collateral of PLN 13,7 million on real estate, assigning all licence and commercial rights under the licence agreement concluded with […] regarding the production of air conditioning equipment to a value of USD 1,2 million (PLN 3968000 approx.) [10], transferring machines and equipment supplied by […] under the licence agreement to a value of USD 2,4 million (PLN 7938000 approx.) and assigning receivables from the sale of air conditioners to a value of at least USD 8 million annually (PLN 26,5 million approx.) [11].
Svoje posojilo je zavarovala predvsem z vzpostavitvijo zavarovanja na nepremičninah v vrednosti 13,7 milijona PLN, odstopom vseh licenčnih in komercialnih pravic na podlagi licenčne pogodbe z […] v zvezi s proizvodnjo opreme za klimatizacijo v vrednosti 1,2 milijona USD (približno 3968000 PLN) [10], prenosom strojev in opreme, ki jih je na podlagi licenčne pogodbe dobavil […], v vrednosti 2,4 milijona USD (približno 7938000 PLN) in odstopom denarnih terjatev iz prodaje klimatskih naprav v vrednosti vsaj 8 milijonov USD letno (približno 26,5 milijona PLN) [11].
In November 2006 Bank […] agreed in a settlement agreement to write off PLN 86,4 million and accepted the repayment of only PLN 11,5 million.
Banka […] je novembra 2006 s sporazumom o poravnavi sklenila, da odpiše dolg v višini 86,4 milijona PLN, in sprejela povračilo v višini le 11,5 milijona PLN.
As such, only 13 % of the liability was eventually repaid by PZL Hydral.
Tako je podjetje PZL Hydral nazadnje odplačalo le 13 % obveznosti.
The rest, i.e. PLN 74,9 million, was written off.
Preostali znesek, tj. 74,9 milijona PLN, je bil odpisan.
Bank […] accepted this low amount despite the fact that it had first-rank collateral on the most significant real estate on which most of the production depended and the administrative structures were located.
Banka […] je ta nizki znesek sprejela kljub dejstvu, da je imela prvovrstno zavarovanje na najpomembnejših nepremičninah, od katerih je bila odvisna večina proizvodnje in v katerih so bile upravne strukture.
This collateral consisted in particular of first-rank mortgages on two real properties for a total amount of PLN 19,75 million, a first-rank pledge on a technological line for the production of compressors in an amount of PLN 20 million, a first-rank assignment of receivables under sales agreements concluded for compressors worth PLN 20 million, a first-rank registered pledge on machinery and equipment with a total value of PLN 2,8 million and first-rank transfer agreements for movables worth PLN 2,65 million, PLN 2,4 million, PLN 0,56 million and PLN 1,1 million respectively.
To zavarovanje so sestavljali predvsem prvovrstne hipoteke na dve nepremičnini v skupni vrednosti 19,75 milijona PLN, prvovrstna zastavna pravica na tehnološki liniji za proizvodnjo kompresorjev v vrednosti 20 milijonov PLN, prvovrstni odstop denarnih terjatev na podlagi sklenjenih sporazumov o prodaji kompresorjev v vrednosti 20 milijonov PLN, prvovrstna registrirana zastavna pravica na strojih in opremi v skupni vrednosti 2,8 milijona PLN ter prvovrstni sporazumi o prenosu premičnin v vrednosti 2,65 milijona PLN, 2,4 milijona PLN, 0,56 milijona PLN in 1,1 milijona PLN.
Moreover, the nature of the collateral would enable any potential buyer to continue production after purchase; would also be possible to transport the machines either as a whole or as sub-assemblies without dismantling them, should any potential buyer decide to move them.
Poleg tega bi način zavarovanja morebitnemu kupcu omogočil nadaljevanje proizvodnje po nakupu; prav tako bi bilo mogoče premestiti celotne stroje ali njihove podsklope brez razstavljanja, če bi se morebitni kupec odločil za to.
After the agreements with the banks, the collateral on the fixed assets was released.
Po sporazumih z bankama se je zavarovanje na osnovnih sredstvih sprostilo.
As a result, the public creditors’ position in respect of this collateral improved, i.e. they received a higher mortgage ranking [12].
Posledično se je položaj javnih upnikov v zvezi s tem zavarovanjem izboljšal, tj. dosegli so višje hipotekarne razrede [12].
Liabilities vis-à-vis public creditors
Obveznosti do javnih upnikov
In 1998, the company's liabilities vis-à-vis public creditors based on claims arising under public law (i.e. claims from the Social Insurance Office, the Lower Silesia Region Tax Office, Wrocław Psie Pole Tax Office, Lower Silesia Regional Office, Wrocław City Council, the State Fund for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled) amounted to PLN 29 million.
Obveznosti podjetja do javnih upnikov so leta 1998 na podlagi terjatev, nastalih v skladu z javnim pravom (tj. terjatev urada za socialno zavarovanje, regionalnega davčnega urada Spodnje Šlezije, davčnega urada okrožja Psie Pole v Vroclavu, regionalnega urada Spodnje Šlezije, mestnega sveta v Vroclavu in državnega sklada za rehabilitacijo invalidov), znašale 29 milijonov PLN.
In addition, the Ministry of Finance had civil-law claims of PLN 9,4 million.
Poleg tega je imelo ministrstvo za finance civilnopravne terjatve v višini 9,4 milijona PLN.
These liabilities to individual public creditors evolved as shown in Tables 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Te obveznosti do posameznih javnih upnikov so se spreminjale, kot je prikazano v preglednicah 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 in 14.
Liabilities of PLZ Hydral vis-à-vis the Social Insurance Office (PLN thousand)
Obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do urada za socialno zavarovanje (v tisoč PLN)
Liabilities of PLZ Hydral vis-à-vis Lower Silesia Regional Tax Office (PLN thousand)
Obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do regionalnega davčnega urada Spodnje Šlezije (v tisoč PLN)
Liabilities of PLZ Hydral vis-à-vis Wrocław Psie Pole Tax Office (PLN thousand)
Obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do davčnega urada okrožja Psie Pole v Vroclavu (v tisoč PLN)
Interest [13]
Obresti [13]
Liabilities of PLZ Hydral vis-à-vis Wrocław City Council (PLN thousand)
Obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do mestnega sveta v Vroclavu (v tisoč PLN)
Liabilities of PLZ Hydral vis-à-vis Lower Silesia Regional Office (PLN thousand)
Obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do regionalnega urada Spodnje Šlezije (v tisoč PLN)
Liabilities of PLZ Hydral vis-à-vis the State Fund for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled (PLN thousand)
Obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do državnega sklada za rehabilitacijo invalidov (v tisoč PLN)
Liabilities of PLZ Hydral vis-à-vis the Ministry of Finance (PLN thousand)
Obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral do ministrstva za finance (v tisoč PLN)
The public creditors charged the interest rates on arrears shown in Table 15.
Javni upniki so zaračunavali zamudne obresti po obrestnih merah, prikazanih v preglednici 15.
It is important to note that Tables 8 to 14 take into account partial repayments of sums and show the level at the year-end; therefore, the interest due in any given year is not directly related to the principal, which can fluctuate.
Pomembno je opozoriti, da so v preglednicah od 8 do 14 upoštevana delna povračila zneskov in prikazane ravni ob koncu leta; zato obresti, ki jih je treba plačati v posameznem letu, niso neposredno povezane z glavnico, ki se lahko spreminja.
Interest on tax arrears [14] [14]Year
Zamudne obresti za neplačane davke [14] [14]Leto
Apart from charging the appropriate interest on tax arrears, the Social Security Office, the Lower Silesia Region Tax Office, Wrocław Psie Pole Tax Office, Wrocław City Council and the Lower Silesian Regional Office secured their claims vis-à-vis PZL Hydral by registering mortgages on its immovable assets.
Urad za socialno varnost, regionalni davčni urad Spodnje Šlezije, davčni urad okrožja Psie Pole v Vroclavu, mestni svet v Vroclavu in regionalni urad Spodnje Šlezije so zaračunavali ustrezne zamudne obresti za neplačane davke ter hkrati zavarovali svoje terjatve do podjetja PZL Hydral z vpisom hipotek na njegova nepremična sredstva.
Tables 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 show changes in the mortgages on PZL Hydral's assets held by these public creditors.
V preglednicah 16, 17, 18, 19 in 20 so prikazane spremembe hipotek na sredstva podjetja PZL Hydral, ki jih imajo ti javni upniki.
Collateral on PZL Hydral assets held by the Social Security Office
Zavarovanje na sredstvih podjetja PZL Hydral, ki ga ima urad za socialno varnost
total amount of mortgages
skupna vrednost hipotek
a mortgage of PLN 6664579,03 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 6664579,03PLN
a mortgage of PLN 941965,12 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 941965,12PLN
a mortgage of PLN 7712474,51 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 7712474,51PLN
a mortgage of PLN 31668847,55 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 31668847,55PLN
a mortgage of PLN 1364127,70 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 1364127,70PLN
a mortgage of PLN 8886112,11 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 8886112,11PLN
a mortgage of PLN 4641357,06 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 4641357,06PLN
Collateral on PZL Hydral assets held by the Lower Silesia Region Tax Office
Zavarovanje na sredstvih podjetja PZL Hydral, ki ga ima regionalni davčni urad Spodnje Šlezije
Collateral on PZL Hydral assets held by Wrocław Psie Pole Tax Office
Zavarovanje na sredstvih podjetja PZL Hydral, ki ga ima davčni urad okrožja Psie Pole v Vroclavu
a mortgage of PLN 99379,00 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 99379,00PLN
Collateral on PZL Hydral assets held by Wrocław City Council
Zavarovanje na sredstvih podjetja PZL Hydral, ki ga ima mestni svet v Vroclavu
a mortgage of PLN 235888,50 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 235888,50PLN
a mortgage of PLN 1173659,60 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 1173659,60PLN
a mortgage of PLN 9097672,45 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 9097672,45PLN
a mortgage of PLN 3538324,00 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 3538324,00PLN
a mortgage of PLN 2790305,40 was added
dodana je bila hipoteka v vrednosti 2790305,40PLN
Collateral on PZL Hydral assets held by Lower Silesia Regional Office
Zavarovanje na sredstvih podjetja PZL Hydral, ki ga ima regionalni urad Spodnje Šlezije
Public creditors with mortgages on PZL Hydral's assets therefore experienced a de facto increase in the value of their collateral.
Vrednost zavarovanja javnih upnikov s hipotekami na sredstvih podjetja PZL Hydral se je torej dejansko povečala.
The Polish authorities informed the Commission that the State Fund for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled and the Ministry of Finance did not hold any collateral (mortgages) on PZL Hydral's assets.
Poljski organi so Komisijo obvestili, da državni sklad za rehabilitacijo invalidov in ministrstvo za finance nista imela zavarovanja (hipotek) na sredstvih podjetja PZL Hydral.
However, the Ministry of Finance enforced part of its claims by way of an agreement with PZL Hydral concluded on 20 May 2002, under which PZL Hydral was to repay a substantial part of its liabilities by end-2002, as shown in Table 14.
Vendar je ministrstvo za finance del terjatev uveljavilo s sporazumom s podjetjem PZL Hydral, sklenjenim 20. maja 2002, v skladu s katerim mora to podjetje znaten del svojih obveznosti odplačati do konca leta 2002, kot je prikazano v preglednici 14.
According to the Polish authorities, public creditors – contrary to private creditors – undertook forced enforcement action through a court enforcement officer.
Po navedbah poljskih organov so javni upniki – v nasprotju z zasebnimi upniki – s sodnim izvršiteljem izvedli ukrepe prisilne izterjave.
Between 1998 and 2007 the Social Security Office issued enforcement titles for an amount of PLN 119,95 million, the Lower Silesia Region Tax Office for an amount of PLN 43,8 million and the State Fund for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled for an amount of PLN 2,1 million, but the amount actually obtained from enforcement did not reach the level of the liabilities indicated in the enforcement titles.
Urad za socialno varnost je med letoma 1998 in 2007 izdal naloge za izterjavo 119,95 milijona PLN, regionalni davčni urad Spodnje Šlezije za 43,8 milijona PLN, državni sklad za rehabilitacijo invalidov pa za 2,1 milijona PLN, vendar dejansko izterjani znesek ni dosegel zneska obveznosti, navedenega v nalogih za izterjavo.
The Polish authorities stressed that alternative options, such as taking possession of assets, were not deemed reasonable by the court enforcement officer to execute and made no economic sense.
Poljski organi so poudarili, da po mnenju sodnega izvršitelja nadomestne možnosti, kot je priposestvovanje sredstev, niso razumne in gospodarsko smiselne.
Other public creditors did not take any enforcement action but they observed the privatisation and restructuring process which, they believed, would provide them with a higher return than direct execution of their claims.
Drugi javni upniki niso izvedli ukrepov za izterjavo, ampak so spremljali proces privatizacije in prestrukturiranja, za katerega so bili prepričani, da jim bo zagotovil večje donose kot neposredno uveljavljanje terjatev.
Summary of public creditor enforcement action vis-à-vis PZL Hydral (1997-2009)
Povzetek ukrepov javnih upnikov za izterjavo zoper podjetje PZL Hydral (1997–2009)
Repaid public liabilities
Odplačane javnopravne obveznosti
Between 1998 and 2009 public liabilities of PLN 87,846 million (26 %) were repaid.
Med letoma 1998 in 2009 so bile odplačane javnopravne obveznosti v višini 87,846 milijona PLN (26 %).
There has been a considerable increase in repayment of PZL Hydral's public liabilities since 2003.
Od leta 2003 se je odplačevanje javnopravnih obveznosti podjetja PZL Hydral znatno povečalo.
PZL Hydral as a company in difficulty
PZL Hydral kot podjetje v težavah
Table 22 shows the financial data of PZL Hydral for 1998-2009.
V preglednici 22 so prikazani finančni podatki podjetja PZL Hydral za obdobje 1998–2009.
Selected data from PZL Hydral's financial reports (PLN thousand)
Izbrani podatki iz finančnih poročil podjetja PZL Hydral (v tisoč PLN)
Revenue from net sales
Čisti prihodek od prodaje
Profit (loss) on sales
Dobiček (izguba) od prodaje
Net profit (loss) [15]
Čisti dobiček (izguba) [15]
Total assets
Sredstva skupaj
Shareholder's (negative) equity
Lastniški (negativni) kapital
Long term liabilities and reserves
Dolgoročne obveznosti in rezerve
From 1998 until 2002, PZL Hydral had positive equity.
Podjetje PZL Hydral je imelo od leta 1998 do leta 2002 pozitiven kapital.
As explained above, from 2008 onwards PZL Hydral derived its income predominantly from selling services and stock produced in previous years and, to a limited extent, from its subsidiaries.
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, je podjetje PZL Hydral od leta 2008 prihodek ustvarjalo predvsem s prodajo storitev in zalog blaga, proizvedenega v prejšnjih letih, delno pa tudi s podružnicami.
PZL Wrocław as a company in difficulty
PZL Wrocław kot podjetje v težavah
As regards the financial situation of PZL Wrocław, neither in 2007, 2008 nor 2009 did PZL Wrocław lose more than 50 % of its capital and nor did it meet the eligibility requirements for insolvency proceedings under Polish law.
Kar zadeva finančno stanje podjetja PZL Wrocław, podjetje v letih 2007, 2008 in 2009 ni izgubilo več kot 50 % svojega kapitala niti ni izpolnilo v poljski zakonodaji določenih pogojev za začetek postopkov zaradi nesolventnosti.
In 2008 PZL Wrocław received contracts for and sold military goods (e.g. hydraulic systems, pneumatic components for fuel control systems) to an amount of […] and provided the Ministry of Defence with maintenance services worth […], i.e. an overall amount of […].
Podjetje PZL Wrocław je leta 2008 prejelo pogodbe za vojaško blago (kot so hidravlični sistemi in pnevmatski elementi za sisteme za reguliranje goriva) v vrednosti […] ter to blago tudi prodalo, hkrati pa je ministrstvu za obrambo zagotovilo storitve vzdrževanja v vrednosti […]; skupni znesek torej znaša […].
The Polish authorities also maintain that, until end-2008, the market on which PZL Wrocław operated, i.e. the aviation and defence market, did not show any signs of slowing down.
Poljski organi prav tako trdijo, da na trgu, na katerem je poslovalo podjetje PZL Wrocław, tj. letalskem in obrambnem trgu, do konca leta 2008 ni bilo znakov upočasnitve dejavnosti.
In 2009, however, PZL Wrocław experienced financial difficulties as a result of a sharp fall in orders by the Ministry of Defence due to the economic crisis.
Vendar je imelo podjetje PZL Wrocław leta 2009 finančne težave zaradi velikega zmanjšanja števila naročil ministrstva za obrambo, ki ga je povzročila gospodarska kriza.