natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Decision of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme “Cooperation” implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) ( OJ L 400, 30.12.2006, p. 86).
Sklep z dne 19. decembra 2006 glede posebnega programa ‚Sodelovanje‘, s katerim se bo izvajal Sedmi okvirni program Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) ( UL L 400, 30.12.2006, str. 86).
Decision of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme “People” implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) ( OJ L 400, 30.12.2006, p. 272).
Sklep z dne 19. decembra 2006 glede posebnega programa ‚Ljudje‘, s katerim se bo izvajal Sedmi okvirni program Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) ( UL L 400, 30.12.2006, str. 272).
Decision of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme “Capacities” implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) ( OJ L 400, 30.12.2006, p. 299).
Sklep z dne 19. decembra 2006 glede posebnega programa ‚Zmogljivosti‘, s katerim se bo izvajal Sedmi okvirni program Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) ( UL L 400, 30.12.2006, str. 299).
HANDLING SECURITY-SENSITIVE RTD ACTIONS
OBRAVNAVA VARNOSTNO OBČUTLJIVIH UKREPOV RTR
Research actions will be classified [1] if they are considered as sensitive.
Raziskovalni ukrepi, ki se štejejo za občutljive, so zaupni [1].
These procedures are described below.
Ti postopki so opisani v nadaljnjem besedilu.
They will apply to all RTD actions under the “Security” Theme in the specific programme “Cooperation”.
Uporabljajo se za vse ukrepe RTR v okviru teme ‚varnost‘ v posebnem programu ‚Sodelovanje‘.
They apply to other themes if so specified in the relevant call or as appropriate when security-sensitive subjects are addressed.
Uporabljajo se tudi za druge teme, če je tako navedeno v ustreznih razpisih, ali kadar se obravnavajo varnostno občutljiva vprašanja, če je to primerno.
Identification of potential classified RTD actions
Določitev morebitnih zaupnih ukrepov RTR
A security-sensitive RTD action is an action that may need to handle classified information.
Varnostno občutljiv ukrep RTR je ukrep, ki bo morda obravnaval zaupne informacije.
A “security considerations” flag will be associated with a proposal:
Predlogu se dodeli oznaka ‚varnostna vprašanja‘:
when the applicant declares a proposal as sensitive,
kadar vložnik predlog opredeli kot občutljiv,
if the expert evaluators, the Commission, or members of the relevant “Programme Committee” (except for the Security Theme: see also section C, below) detect or suspect any of the following conditions:
če strokovni ocenjevalci, Komisija ali člani ustreznega ‚programskega odbora‘ (razen v okviru teme varnost: glej tudi spodnji oddelek C) odkrijejo ali sumijo na katero od naslednjih okoliščin:
classified information is, or may be, used as background information,
zaupne informacije se uporabljajo ali bi se lahko uporabile kot osnovne informacije,
some foreground is planned to be classified.
predvideno je, da bodo nekatere primarne informacije zaupne.
Whenever a “security considerations” flag is associated with a proposal, the circumstances of the planned work will be further scrutinised according to the procedure described in section C below.
Kadar je predlogu dodeljena oznaka ‚varnostna vprašanja‘, se bodo okoliščine načrtovanega dela dodatno podrobno preučile v skladu s postopkom iz spodnjega oddelka C.
In general proposals under the “Security” Theme, (and in other cases if so requested in the relevant Guide for Applicants), must identify — if needed — the background required for carrying the RTD action and the classified foreground that will be produced by the action.
Na splošno morajo predlogi v okviru teme ‚varnost‘ (in v drugih primerih, če tako zahteva pripadajoči priročnik za vložnike) po potrebi opredeliti osnovne informacije, ki so potrebne za izvajanje ukrepa RTR, in zaupne primarne informacije, pridobljene z ukrepom.
In the case of a proposal involving classified information (background and/or foreground), a “Security Aspect Letter” (SAL) [2] and its annexed “Security Classification Guide” (SCG) [3] must be part of the proposal.
Če predlog vključuje zaupne informacije (osnovne ali primarne), mora predlog vključevati ‚listino varnostnih vidikov‘ (LVV) [2] in njeno prilogo ‚vodnik po stopnjah zaupnosti‘ (VSZ) [3].
The SCG will cover:
Vodnik po stopnjah zaupnosti določa:
the level of classification of background and foreground information,
stopnjo zaupnosti osnovnih in primarnih informacij,
which participant will have access to what information.
kateri sodelujoči bodo imeli dostop do katerih informacij.
formal written authorisation by the relevant security authorities to use the classified background information.
uradno pisno dovoljenje ustreznih varnostnih organov za uporabo zaupnih osnovnih informacij.
The SAL and the SCG, accompanied by supporting documents, will also be examined in the scrutiny procedure described below.
Listina varnostnih vidikov in vodnik po stopnjah zaupnosti skupaj s priloženimi dokazilnimi listinami se prav tako preučita v postopku podrobnega pregleda, opisanem v nadaljevanju.
Scrutiny of potential classified RTD actions
Podroben pregled morebitnih zaupnih ukrepov RTR
After the evaluation of the research content of proposals, they shall be ranked according to the evaluation results.
Po pregledu raziskovalne vsebine se predlogi razporedijo glede na rezultate ocenjevanja.
A “main list” containing proposals to be negotiated, namely that have not been rejected, and for which funding is available, plus a “reserve-list” are established by the Commission.
Komisija sestavi ‚glavni seznam‘, ki vsebuje predloge, za katere se začnejo pogajanja, torej predloge, ki niso bili zavrnjeni in za katere so sredstva na voljo, ter ‚rezervni seznam‘.
Any RTD action on the main list and on the reserve list, which has the flag “security considerations”, will undergo a scrutiny procedure.
Za vsak ukrep RTR na glavnem seznamu ali na rezervnem seznamu, ki ima oznako ‚varnostna vprašanja‘, se opravi postopek podrobnega pregleda.
This will be performed by an ad-hoc sub-committee of the Security Theme Programme Committee: the “Security Scrutiny Committee”.
Ta pregled opravi začasni pododbor v okviru programskega odbora za temo ‚varnost‘: ‚odbor za podrobni varnostni pregled‘.
This “Security Scrutiny Committee” is composed of Member State representatives nominated in close liaison with the competent national security authorities, supported if appropriate by representatives of the relevant Programme Committee(s), in a configuration representing the countries of the applicants.
‚Odbor za podrobni varnostni pregled‘ sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, ki se imenujejo v tesni povezavi s pristojnimi nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi, in katere, če je to primerno, podpirajo predstavniki ustreznih programskih odborov v taki sestavi, da so zastopane države vložnikov.
It should be noted that, due to the intrinsic sensitivity of the “Security” theme, all the short listed proposals in that Theme will be scrutinised.
Poudariti je treba, da bodo zaradi notranje občutljivosti teme ‚varnost‘ podrobno pregledani vsi predlogi na kratkem seznamu v okviru te teme.
This Committee will verify if all security aspects are properly taken into account by the applicants.
Odbor preveri, ali so vložniki ustrezno upoštevali vse varnostne vidike.
Proposals will be scrutinised by Committee members from the same countries as the applicants.
Predloge podrobno pregledajo člani odbora, ki prihajajo iz istih držav kot vložniki.
This process should lead to a common position between the concerned national representatives resulting in one of the following recommendations:
Namen tega postopka je doseči skupno stališče zadevnih nacionalnih predstavnikov, ki se izraža kot eno od naslednjih priporočil:
classification is not required: negotiation of the RTD action can be started (though some recommendations for negotiations may be issued, if relevant),
Zaupnost ni potrebna: pogajanja o ukrepu RTR se lahko začnejo (čeprav se lahko podajo nekatera priporočila za pogajanja, če je to primerno),
classification is required: specific recommendations for the negotiation are given and the negotiation will be subject to certain conditions to be met in the Grant Agreement.
Zaupnost je potrebna: podana so posebna priporočila za pogajanja, sama pogajanja pa morajo izpolnjevati določene pogoje, ki se sprejmejo v sporazumu o dodelitvi sredstev.
The RTD action will become a Classified RTD Action [4] and will be EU-classified at the level of the highest classification of the information used/produced by the RTD action as indicated in the SAL and its annexed SCG,
Ukrep RTR postane zaupni ukrep RTR [4], EU pa ga označi za zaupnega na najvišji stopnji zaupnosti informacij, uporabljenih/pridobljenih v ukrepu RTR, kot je to navedeno v listini varnostnih vidikov in priloženem vodniku po stopnjah zaupnosti,
the proposal is too sensitive to be financed because the applicants do not have the appropriate experience, skills or permissions to handle properly the classified information.
Predlog je preveč občutljiv za financiranje, saj vložniki nimajo ustreznih izkušenj, usposobljenosti ali dovoljenj za pravilno ravnanje z zaupnimi informacijami.
In that case, the proposal may be rejected.
V takem primeru se predlog lahko zavrne.
If so, the Commission will explain the reasons of rejection, except when these reasons are themselves classified.
Pri tem Komisija navede razloge za zavrnitev, razen če niso že sami razlogi zaupni.
Based on this common position, the Commission will determine the level of classification.
Na podlagi skupnega stališča Komisija določi stopnjo zaupnosti.
As a result, the Commission, together with all the relevant NSAs, will then verify, during negotiation and implementation of the Grant Agreement, that all the necessary procedures and actions are put in place in order to guarantee that classified information is dealt with in the appropriate way.
Komisija nato skupaj z vsemi ustreznimi nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi med pogajanji in izvajanjem sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev preveri, ali so vzpostavljeni vsi potrebni postopki in ukrepi, da se zagotovi ustrezna obravnava zaupnih informacij.
Export and transfer licences
Dovoljenja za izvoz in prenos
In addition, a proposal may also be considered as sensitive, independently of any security classification, if it plans to exchange material subject to transfer or export licensing.
Predlog se lahko ne glede na stopnjo zaupnosti šteje za občutljivega tudi, če se namerava izmenjati material, za katerega je potrebno dovoljenje za prenos ali izvozno dovoljenje.
In that context, applicants must comply with national laws and EU regulation [5].
V zvezi s tem morajo vložniki upoštevati nacionalno zakonodajo in uredbo EU [5].
If export licences (or intra EU licences) are required for carrying the planned work, applicants must clarify the requirement to have such export or transfer licences and must provide a copy of export or transfer licences (or of the requests).E.
Če so za izvedbo načrtovane dejavnosti potrebna izvozna dovoljenja (ali dovoljenja za prenos znotraj EU), morajo vložniki pojasniti zahteve za pridobitev takega izvoznega dovoljenja ali dovoljenja za prenos in priložiti kopijo izvoznega dovoljenja ali dovoljenja za prenos (oziroma vloge za pridobitev dovoljenja).E.
Security concerns can not be invoked as a reason for the rejection of proposals for non-classified RTD actions that entail the participation of entities from a country that is neither an EU Member State nor a country associated to FP7.
Na varnostna vprašanja se ni mogoče sklicevati kot na razlog za zavrnitev predlogov za ukrepe RTR, ki niso zaupni in vključujejo sodelovanje subjektov iz države, ki ni država članica EU oziroma ni povezana s 7OP.
The only exceptions to this will occur if:
Izjema se pri tem uporablja samo, če:
the topic was described in the work programme as not open to international cooperation: in that case any proposal containing international cooperation will be declared as ineligible,
je bila v delovnem programu tema opisana kot tema, pri kateri mednarodno sodelovanje ni mogoče: v tem primeru se šteje, da predlog, ki predvideva mednarodno sodelovanje, ne izpolnjuje pogojev,
the “security considerations” flag has been raised, in which case the proposal will be scrutinised according to the procedure described above.
je bila predlogu dodeljena oznaka ‚varnostna vprašanja‘; v tem primeru se predlog podrobno preuči v skladu s prej opisanim postopkom.
As defined in Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom.
Kakor je to opredeljeno v Sklepu 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom.
“Security Aspects Letter” (SAL): “a set of special contractual conditions, issued by the contracting authority, which forms an integral part of a classified contract involving access to or generation of EU classified information, and that identifies the security requirements or those elements of the classified contract requiring security protection”, as defined in section 27 of Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom.
‚Listina varnostnih vidikov (LVV)‘: ‚zbirka posebnih pogodbenih pogojev – ki jih objavi naročnik in so sestavni del tajnega naročila, ki vključuje dostop do tajnih podatkov EU ali njihov nastanek – ki navaja varnostne zahteve ali tiste elemente tajnega naročila, ki zahtevajo varnostno zaščito‘, kakor je opredeljena v v oddelku 27 Sklepa 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom.
“Security Classification Guide” (SCG): “a document which describes the elements of a programme, contract or grant agreement which are classified, specifying the applicable security classification levels.
‚vodnik stopenj tajnosti (VST)‘: ‚dokument, ki opisuje elemente programa, naročila ali sporazuma o donaciji, ki so tajni, in opredeljuje posamezne stopnje tajnosti.
The SCG may be expanded throughout the life of the programme, contract or grant agreement, and the elements of information may be reclassified or downgraded.
Vodnik stopenj tajnosti se lahko med trajanjem celotnega programa, naročila ali sporazuma o donaciji razširi, elementi podatkov pa se lahko prerazvrstijo ali razvrstijo na nižjo stopnjo.
The SCG must be part of the SAL”, as defined in section 27 of Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom.
Vodnik stopenj tajnosti mora biti del listine varnostnih vidikov‘, kakor je opredeljen v oddelku 27 Sklepa 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom.
Treatment of confidential data is governed by the relevant European Union and Euratom legislation, including the institutions’ internal rules such as Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom.
Ravnanje z zaupnimi podatki ureja ustrezna zakonodaja Evropske unije in Euratoma, vključno z notranjimi varnostnimi pravili institucij, kot je Sklep 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom.
TWO-STAGE PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION PROCEDURES
POSTOPKI DVOSTOPENJSKE ODDAJE IN OCENJEVANJA PREDLOGOV
The call for proposals will specify when a two stage procedure applies.
Razpis za zbiranje predlogov določa, kdaj se mora uporabiti dvostopenjski postopek.
For this, applicants must submit first a reduced or outline proposal, the “part B” of which will be no longer than 20 pages.
V ta namen morajo vložniki najprej predložiti skrajšani predlog ali njegov osnutek, katerega ‚del B‘ ne obsega več kot 20 strani.
The font size shall be at least 11.
Velikost črk je vsaj 11.
A lower page limit, and/or a larger font size, may be stipulated for certain calls.
Za nekatere razpise se lahko določita manjši obseg strani in/ali večja velikost črk.
In certain cases, to be specified in the call, first stage proposals will be evaluated on a continuous basis (see Annex D).
V nekaterih primerih, ki so predvideni v razpisu, se predlogi na prvi stopnji stalno ocenjujejo (glej Prilogo D).
In these cases, all successful proposals submitted during a certain period will be invited to submit their second stage proposal by a deadline or intermediate closure date, as specified in the call.
V teh primerih so vsi uspešni predlogi, predloženi v določenem obdobju, povabljeni, da pošljejo svoj predlog za obravnavo na drugi stopnji do končnega ali vmesnega roka, kakor je določen v razpisu.
For first-stage proposals, the evaluation process is based on the process for full proposals as detailed in section 3.
Ocenjevalni postopek za predloge na prvi stopnji temelji na postopku za popolne predloge, kakor je opisan v oddelku 3.
Reduced or outline proposals are evaluated by a minimum of three experts.
Skrajšane predloge ali osnutke predlogov ocenijo najmanj trije strokovnjaki.
Consensus discussions may be convened, where necessary.
Po potrebi se skličejo razprave za doseganje soglasja.
For first-stage proposals, the consensus report may consist of a collation of the individual evaluation reports signed by each of the experts.
Poročilo o soglasju za predloge na prvi stopnji je lahko zbirka poročil o individualnem ocenjevanju, ki so jih podpisali posamezni strokovnjaki.
In which case, the consensus scores for a proposal may be based on either the average scores awarded for each criterion or on the majority judgement as to whether or not each applicable threshold has been achieved.
V tem primeru rezultati doseganja soglasja glede nekega predloga lahko temeljijo bodisi na povprečnih ocenah, dodeljenih za posamezno merilo, ali na večinski sodbi o tem, ali so bili doseženi vsi veljavni pragovi.
If this option is used, it will be announced in the call for proposals, along with the scoring procedure.
Če se uporabi ta možnost, bo to objavljeno v razpisu za zbiranje predlogov, skupaj s postopkom določanja ocen.
Coordinators of those proposals that have passed all thresholds are invited to submit a full proposal within a given period.
Koordinatorji predlogov, ki so dosegli vse pragove, so vabljeni, da v določenem roku vložijo popolni predlog.
The Evaluation Summary Report (ESR) from the first stage evaluation is not sent to these successful coordinators at stage one, unless the relevant work programme states otherwise.
Zbirno poročilo o ocenjevanju na prvi stopnji se ne pošlje uspešnim koordinatorjem na prvi stopnji, razen če ustrezen delovni program ne določa drugače.
The Commission adopts a rejection decision on the outline proposals which have not passed all thresholds.
Komisija sprejme sklep o zavrnitvi osnutkov predlogov, ki niso dosegli vseh pragov.
After this decision, coordinators of rejected outline proposals are informed in writing of the Commission’s decision and receive the ESR.
Po sprejetju tega sklepa so koordinatorji zavrnjenih osnutkov predlogov pisno obveščeni o sklepu Komisije, prejmejo pa tudi zbirno poročilo o ocenjevanju.
Full proposals for the second stage are submitted and evaluated according to the same procedures as for single stage proposals, as described in section 3.
Popolni predlogi na drugi stopnji se predložijo in ocenijo v skladu z enakimi postopki, ki veljajo za enostopenjsko oddajo predlogov, kot so opisani v oddelku 3.
Applicable criteria, thresholds and weightings for this second stage are those set out in the call.
Za drugo stopnjo se uporabljajo merila, pragovi in ponderji, opredeljeni v razpisu.
With a view to upholding the principle of equal treatment, proposals submitted to the second stage may be excluded if their scope deviates substantially from the corresponding first-stage proposal.
Zaradi upoštevanja načela enake obravnave se lahko predlogi, ki so bili predloženi za obravnavo na drugi stopnji, izključijo, če se njihova vsebina bistveno razlikuje od ustreznega predloga, predloženega na prvi stopnji.
CONTINUOUS SUBMISSION SCHEMES
SHEME STALNE PREDLOŽITVE
Some calls for proposals may be continuously open (usually for the duration of a specific programme) to allow proposal submission at any time but may specify intermediate closure dates for receipt of proposals to be considered in any particular evaluation session.
Nekateri razpisi za zbiranje predlogov so lahko stalno odprti (običajno med trajanjem posebnega programa), zato se lahko predlogi oddajo kadar koli oziroma ob upoštevanju vmesnih rokov za prejem predlogov, ki se bodo obravnavali v okviru posameznega ocenjevanja.
In this case, all proposals received before any intermediate closure dates are evaluated in an evaluation session that is normally organised within a month after this date.
V tem primeru se vsi predlogi, prejeti pred določenim vmesnim rokom, ocenijo v okviru posameznega ocenjevanja, ki se običajno organizira en mesec po tem roku.
Intermediate and final closure dates are specified in the relevant calls.
Vmesni in končni roki za zaključek razpisa so opredeljeni v zadevnih razpisih.
Continuously open calls may also follow a two-stage proposal submission and evaluation process.
Stalno odprti razpisi se lahko ravnajo tudi po postopku dvostopenjske oddaje in ocenjevanja predlogov.
In this case, short first stage (outline) proposals may be evaluated individually as they are received and a closure date for the submission of a full proposal for the second-stage evaluation is provided for in the call.
V tem primeru se lahko kratki predlogi na prvi stopnji (osnutki) ocenjujejo posamično ob prejetju, za oddajo popolnih predlogov za ocenjevanje na drugi stopnji pa se uporablja končni rok, naveden v razpisu.
Calls may also provide that proposals are evaluated individually when they arrive before any intermediate or final closure date.
Nekateri razpisi pa lahko tudi določajo, da se predlogi ocenjujejo posamično ob prejetju, pred kakršnim koli vmesnim ali končnim rokom za zaključek razpisa.
They are then all reviewed and ranked after this date and evaluation results are made available immediately.
Vsi ti predlogi se nato pregledajo in razvrstijo po tem datumu, rezultati ocenjevanja pa so na voljo takoj.
For continuously open calls, for all proposals arriving at least three weeks before each intermediate closure date, the Commission may carry out pre-proposal checks (see section 2.2) as the proposals are received.
Pri stalno odprtih razpisih lahko Komisija za vse predloge, ki prispejo najmanj tri tedne pred posameznim vmesnim rokom, opravi predhodni pregled (glej oddelek 2.2) ob njihovem prejetju.
Where a proposal is found not to meet the call requirements or where a doubt exists over whether the proposal fulfils these requirements, the proposal coordinator is contacted by the Commission in order to request further information to verify any requirements which cannot be judged or to indicate that the proposal as submitted may not meet the call requirements.
Če se ugotovi, da predlog ne izpolnjuje zahtev razpisa, ali če obstaja dvom o tem, ali predlog izpolnjuje te zahteve, Komisija stopi v stik s koordinatorjem predloga in ga zaprosi za dodatne informacije, da se preverijo določene zahteve, ki jih ni mogoče oceniti, oziroma da koordinatorju sporoči, da predlog, kakor je bil predložen, ne izpolnjuje zahtev razpisa.
In such instances, the proposal coordinator may withdraw the proposal or may provide additional information, before the intermediate call closure, to allow the checks to be completed.
V takih primerih lahko koordinator predloga pred vmesnim rokom za zaključek razpisa predlog umakne ali predloži dodatne informacije, ki omogočajo dokončanje preverjanj.
If such additional information is not received or the proposal is not withdrawn before the intermediate call closure, the proposal is evaluated as it stands.
Če ne predloži dodatnih informacij oziroma če ne umakne predloga pred vmesnim rokom, se predlog oceni v prvotni obliki.
A written record of all such contacts is attached to the proposal file.
Pisni seznam vseh takih stikov je priložen dokumentaciji predloga.
PROCEDURES FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION ON PAPER
POSTOPKI ZA ODDAJO PREDLOGA V PAPIRNI OBLIKI