natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission has to assess whether the evidence supplied by the exporting producer is sufficient to show that the MET criteria are fulfilled.
Komisija oceni, ali dokazi, ki jih zagotovi proizvajalec izvoznik, zadostujejo za prikaz, da so merila za TGO izpolnjena.
As the Commission established a number of elements pointing to significant State interference concerning the cost of major inputs, it is consequently for the company to demonstrate that this State interference does not exist and/or that it did not affect the company’s decisions (criterion 1 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation).
Ker je Komisija ugotovila številne elemente, ki kažejo na večje vmešavanje države v zvezi s stroški večjih vlaganj, pa mora družba dokazati, da takšno vmešavanje države ne obstaja in/ali ni vplivalo na odločitve družbe (merilo 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe).
In any event, as set out in recitals (31) and (40), Since Hardware has also failed to show that it fulfils criterion 2 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation concerning accounting for which it has claimed an excessive burden to prove.
V vsakem primeru, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (34) in (43), družba Since Hardware ni dokazala, da izpolnjuje merilo 2 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe v zvezi z računovodstvom, za katerega je trdila, da ji dokazovanje predstavlja pretirano breme.
Further to the above, Since Hardware made two new claims in its comments on the final disclosure document.
Dalje, družba Since Hardware je svojim pripombam na dokument o končnem razkritju dodala dve novi trditvi.
First, Since Hardware claimed that the normal value should have been adjusted in accordance with Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation because the raw materials (steel products) in the PRC are lower-priced than in the analogue country market.
Prvič, družba Since Hardware je trdila, da bi bilo treba normalno vrednost prilagoditi v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe, ker so v LRK cene surovin (jeklenih izdelkov) nižje kot na trgu primerljive države.
Indeed, it is recalled that Since Hardware was denied MET.
Kot je znano, je bila družbi Since Hardware TGO zavrnjena.
Consequently, the normal value is established in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country.
Normalna vrednost se zato določi v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
This necessarily implies that prices and costs in the PRC are considered to be unreliable for the establishment of normal value and may not be used to determine or otherwise adjust the latter.
To nujno pomeni, da za cene in stroške v LRK velja, da niso zanesljivi za ugotavljanje normalne vrednosti in jih ni mogoče uporabiti za določanje ali drugačno prilaganje te vrednosti.
It is further noted that an adjustment under Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation as claimed by Since Hardware cannot be made if it is not shown that customers would consistently pay different prices for the like product on the domestic market, in this case in the analogue country market, because of a difference in raw material prices.
Dalje je treba opozoriti, da prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe, kot trdi družba Since Hardware, ni mogoča, če se ne dokaže, da bi zaradi razlike v cenah surovin stranke na domačem trgu, v tem primeru na trgu primerljive države, dosledno plačevale različne cene za podobni izdelek.
Since Hardware has not demonstrated any such price difference.
Družba Since Hardware ni dokazala nobene takšne razlike v ceni.
Second, Since Hardware has claimed that the Commission did not carry out a sufficiently detailed injury analysis in the present investigation.
Drugič, družba Since Hardware je trdila, da Komisija v tej preiskavi ni izvedla dovolj natančne analize škode.
It also claimed that in line with Article 3(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission should have investigated all injury indicators.
Prav tako je trdila, da bi morala Komisija v skladu s členom 3(3) osnovne uredbe preiskati vse kazalnike škode.
It should be noted however, that the Commission has found (see in particular part D) that dumped imports from Since Hardware substantially increased over the period considered while their sales prices were found to be largely undercutting those of the Union industry.
Treba pa je opozoriti, da je Komisija ugotovila (glej zlasti del D), da se je v obravnavanem obdobju dampinški uvoz iz družbe Since Hardware znatno povečal, medtem ko so bile prodajne cene družbe nelojalno nižje od cen industrije Unije.
This finding is based on an objective examination of positive evidence.
Ta ugotovitev temelji na objektivni preiskavi pozitivnih dokazov.
It thus complies with Article 3 of the basic Regulation.
Zato je v skladu s členom 3 osnovne uredbe.
It is true that not all of the factors set out in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation have been examined.
Res pa je, da niso bili preiskani vsi dejavniki iz člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
However, it should be recalled that in a situation where Since Hardware was not yet found to be dumping, namely during the first investigation, it was already found, by examining those factors, that the dumped imports from the PRC caused injury.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da je bilo v položaju, ko za družbo Since Hardware še ni bilo ugotovljeno, da izvaja damping, to je v prvi preiskavi, na podlagi preiskovanja teh dejavnikov že ugotovljeno, da je dampinški uvoz iz LRK povzročal škodo.
Examining those factors once again would have been of no use, since even assuming that all those factors would now have become positive, that would be (at least in part) due to the fact that the Union industry is now protected against all [13] dumped exports from the PRC and Ukraine (except those from Since Hardware).
Ponovno preiskovanje teh dejavnikov ne bi bilo uporabno, ker bi tudi predpostavka, da bi bili vsi navedeni dejavniki zdaj pozitivni, (vsaj deloma) temeljila na dejstvu, da je industrija Unije zdaj zaščitena pred celotnim [12] dampinškim izvozom iz LRK in Ukrajine (razen pred izvozom iz družbe Since Hardware).
Moreover, no factor has been identified that would break the causal link between the dumped imports from Since Hardware and their negative effects on the Union industry.
Poleg tega ni bil ugotovljen noben dejavnik, ki bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz družbe Since Hardware in njegovim negativnim učinkom na industrijo Unije.
Finally, not imposing measures against Since Hardware would be discriminatory vis-à-vis the exporting producers subject to the measure imposed following the first original investigation.
Končno, do proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim je bil po prvi prvotni preiskavi naložen ukrep, bi bilo diskriminatorno, če za družbo Since Hardware ukrep ne bi bil uveden.
In view of the above conclusions reached with regard to dumping, resulting contribution to injury, causation and Union interest, definitive measures on imports of the product concerned from the PRC, produced by Since Hardware, should be imposed.
Glede na zgornje sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, posledičnim prispevkom k škodi, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije je treba uvesti dokončne ukrepe na uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK, ki ga proizvaja družba Since Hardware.
The level of the definitive anti-dumping measures should be sufficient to eliminate the injury to the Union industry caused by the dumped imports, without exceeding the dumping margins found.
Stopnja dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov bi morala biti takšna, da bi odpravila škodo, ki jo je industriji Unije povzročil dampinški uvoz, ne da bi presegla ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
As stated in recital (72), the Union industry’s prices were found to be overall loss-making during the IP.
Kakor je navedeno zgoraj (uvodna izjava (75)), je bilo ugotovljeno, da so cene industrije Unije v OP v celoti ustvarjale izgubo.
Therefore, it would not be appropriate to base the duty merely on the margin of undercutting.
Zato ne bi bilo primerno, če bi dajatev temeljila le na stopnji nelojalno znižanih prodajnih cen.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Union industry to cover its costs and obtain a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports.
Pri izračunu višine dajatve, potrebne za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, se je upoštevalo, da morajo kateri koli ukrepi industriji Unije omogočiti pokritje njenih stroškov in dobiček pred davkom, kot se lahko doseže ob običajnih konkurenčnih pogojih, tj. ob odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza.
The pre-tax profit margin used for this calculation was 7 % of turnover.
Stopnja dobička pred odbitkom davka, ki se je uporabila za ta izračun, je bila 7 % prihodkov od prodaje.
As mentioned in recital (63) of Regulation (EC) No 452/2007, it was demonstrated in the course of the first investigation that this was the profit level that could reasonably be expected in the absence of injurious dumping.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (63) Uredbe (ES) št. 452/2007, se je v okviru prve preiskave izkazalo, da je bila to običajno pričakovana stopnja dobička brez škodljivega dampinga.
On this basis, a non-injurious price was calculated for the like product of the Union industry.
Na podlagi tega je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena za podobni izdelek industrije Unije.
For this purpose, information was collected from the Union industry to calculate the weighted average of their actual profit/loss margin during the current IP.
S tem namenom so bile od industrije Unije zbrane informacije, da bi se izračunalo tehtano povprečje njihove dejansko nastale stopnje dobička/izgube v sedanjem OP.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by deducting the thus calculated actual profit/loss margin of the Union industry from their sales prices and adding the above mentioned target profit margin of 7 %.
Neškodljiva cena je bila pridobljena tako, da se je od prodajnih cen industrije Unije odbila njihova tako izračunana dejanska stopnja dobička/izgube in prištela zgoraj navedena 7-odstotna ciljna stopnja dobička.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the undercutting calculation, with the average non-injurious price of products sold by the Union industry on the Union market.
Potrebno zvišanje cen je bilo nato določeno na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno, kakor je bila določena za izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, in povprečno neškodljivo ceno izdelkov, ki jih je industrija Unije prodala na trgu Unije.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average import CIF value.
Kakršna koli razlika, ki je izhajala iz te primerjave, je bila nato izražena kot odstotek povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
An injury elimination level of 35,8 % was thus established, which was below the dumping margin found for Since Hardware.
Ugotovljena raven odprave škode je znašala 35,8 %, kar je bilo pod stopnjo dampinga, ki je bila ugotovljena za družbo Since Hardware.
In the context of the review pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1515/2001 and in the light of the WTO Appellate Body report as adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, and in particular paragraphs 305 and 306 thereof, Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2010 excluded Since Hardware from the definitive anti-dumping measure imposed by Regulation (EC) No 452/2007.
V okviru pregleda v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1515/2001 in glede na poročilo pritožbenega organa STO, ki ga je sprejel Organ STO za reševanje sporov, in zlasti odstavka 305 in 306 poročila, je Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 1241/2010 izklučila družbo Since Hardware iz dokončnega protidampinškega ukrepa, uvedenega z Uredbo (ES) št. 452/2007.
A new measure may now be imposed on Since Hardware.
Lahko se uvede nov ukrep za družbo Since Hardware.
Form and level of measure
Oblika in stopnja ukrepa
In the light of the foregoing, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, it is considered that a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC and produced by Since Hardware at the level eliminating the injury.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe se zdi potrebno uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK, ki ga proizvaja družba Since Hardware, na stopnji odprave škode.
On the basis of the above, the definitive duty rate for these imports is 35,8 %.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je dokončna stopnja dajatve za takšen uvoz 35,8 %.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, anti-dumping measures normally apply for five years, unless there are specific grounds or circumstances which call for a shorter period.
Protidampinški ukrepi v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe običajno veljajo pet let, razen če je to obdobje krajše zaradi posebnih razlogov ali okoliščin.
In the current case, it is considered appropriate to limit the duration of the measure so that it lasts until the expiry of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of the product concerned originating, inter alia, in the PRC imposed by Regulation (EC) No 452/2007.
V sedanjem primeru se zdi ustrezno, da se omeji trajanje ukrepa, tako da ta traja do prenehanja protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom med drugim iz LRK, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 452/2007.
This will give the opportunity to consider at the same time any request for expiry review of the measures in force for all imports originating, inter alia, in the PRC.
Tako bo dana tudi priložnost, da se istočasno preuči vsak zahtevek za pregled ob izteku ukrepov, ki veljajo za uvoz s poreklom med drugim iz LRK.
Of course, operators concerned, and in particular Since Hardware and/or the Union industry may, before 27 April 2012, request other reviews, in particular an interim review, of this Regulation provided that all requirements for doing so are complied with.
Zadevni nosilci dejavnosti, ter zlasti družba Since Hardware in/ali industrija Unije, lahko seveda pred 27. aprilom 2012 zahtevajo druge preglede te uredbe, predvsem vmesni pregled, če so za to izpolnjene vse zahteve.
Any claim requesting the application of this individual company anti-dumping duty rate (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [14] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo te stopnje protidampinške dajatve za posamezno družbo (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba nemudoma vložiti pri Komisiji [13] skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe pri proizvodnji, domači prodaji in izvozu, povezanih na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali navedeno spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, this Regulation will then be amended accordingly,
Če bo primerno, se bo uredba ustrezno spremenila –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of ironing boards, whether or not free-standing, with or without a steam soaking and/or heating top and/or blowing top, including sleeve boards, and essential parts thereof, i.e. the legs, the top and the iron rest originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., falling within CN codes ex39249000, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 and ex85169000 (TARIC codes 3924900010, 4421909810, 7323939010, 7323999110, 7323999910, 8516797010 and 8516900051).
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz likalnih desk, prostostoječih ali ne, z ali brez sistema za vsrkavanje odvečne pare in/ali ogrevalnega sistema in/ali sistema za pihanje zraka, vključno z rokavniki, in njihovih bistvenih delov, tj. podnožjem, prevleko in odlagalno površino za likalnik, s porek lom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in ki jih proizvaja družba Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., uvrščenih pod oznake KN ex39249000, ex44219098, ex73239390, ex73239991, ex73239999, ex85167970 in ex85169000 (oznake TARIC 3924900010, 4421909810, 7323939010, 7323999110, 7323999910, 8516797010 in 8516900051).
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, for products manufactured by the company specified below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelke, ki jih proizvaja spodaj navedena družba, je:
Unless reviewed under Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, it shall remain in force until 27 April 2012.
Razen v primeru pregleda na podlagi člena 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 ta uredba velja do 27. aprila 2012.
OJ L 84, 31.3.2010, p. 13.
UL C 237, 2.10.2009, str. 5.
OJ C 237, 2.10.2009, p. 5.
WT/DS295/AB/R, 29. november 2005.
WT/DS295/AB/R, 29 November 2005.
Glej stran 8 tega uradnega lista.
Haley; ‘China’s Specialty Steel Subsidies: Massive, Pervasive and Illegal’ by the Specialty Steel Industry of North America; ‘The China Syndrome: How Subsidies and Government Intervention Created the World’s Largest Steel Industry’ by Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, July 2006.
Haley, „China's Specialty Steel Subsidies: Massive, Pervasive and Illegal“ združenja Specialty Steel Industry of North America, „The China Syndrome: How Subsidies and Government Intervention Created the World’s Largest Steel Industry“ družbe Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, julij 2006. [7] Vir: Steel Business Briefing.
Source: Steel Business Briefing.
Čeprav ta ugotovitev – skupaj z drugimi ugotovitvami v zvezi z obravnavanim obdobjem – zadošča za ugotovitev škode, je treba opozoriti, da dejstva potrjujejo, da se je obseg uvoza likalnih desk, ki jih proizvaja družba Since Hardware – ki je bil znaten že v zgoraj omenjenem OP – v primerjavi z OP prve preiskave do sedanjega OP približno podvojil.
Although this finding is already sufficient – together with the other findings relating to the period considered – to find injury, it is noted that it is confirmed by the fact that when compared to the IP of the first investigation, the volume of imports of ironing boards produced by Since Hardware - which was already significant during the aforementioned IP - has approximately doubled by the current IP.
Čeprav tudi ta ugotovitev – skupaj z drugimi ugotovitvami v zvezi z obravnavanim obdobjem – zadošča za ugotovitev škode, je treba opozoriti, da dejstva potrjujejo, da je tržni delež družbe Since Hardware v primerjavi z OP prve preiskave do sedanjega OP narasel za 89 %.
Although also this finding is already sufficient – together with the other findings relating to the period considered – to find injury, it is noted that it is confirmed by the fact that when compared to the IP of the first investigation, the market share of Since Hardware grew by 89 % by the current IP.
Glede na obveznost razlage zakonodaje Unije, kolikor je mogoče v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi Unije.
In light of the obligation to interpret Union law as much as possible in conformity with the Union’s international obligations.
Jeklene varjene cevi med drugim iz Turčije v zvezi z družbo Noksel, UL L 343, 19.12.2008, uvodna izjava (143).
Steel welded tubes from inter alia Turkey, concerning the company Noksel, OJ L 343, 19.12.2008, recital (143).
Domnevno je v določenem obdobju zaradi razveljavitve Uredbe (ES) št. 452/2007 s strani Sodišča v zvezi z družbo Foshan Shunde za to družbo dejansko veljala dajatev nič, vendar to ne pomeni večje spremembe, zlasti ker je do tega prišlo več let po tem, ko je navedena uredba stopila v veljavo.
It was established that after the investigation period in the first investigation, i.e. after 2005, export restrictions were imposed by the State on several steel products, including the main raw materials for the production of ironing boards, i.e. steel plate, steel pipes and steel wire.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je država po obdobju preiskave v prvi preiskavi, tj. po letu 2005, uvedla izvozne omejitve na različne jeklene izdelke, vključno z glavnimi surovinami za proizvodnjo likalnih desk, tj. jeklenimi ploščami, jeklenimi cevmi in jeklenimi žicami.
It is noted that the cost of these raw materials represent a significant part of the total raw material cost of the product concerned.
Opozoriti pa je treba, da stroški teh surovin predstavljajo znatni delež skupnih stroškov surovin za zadevni izdelek.
Based on information provided by the Union industry, it appears that the consumption of ironing boards in the Union has remained substantially stable since the publication of Regulation (EC) No 452/2007, having only slightly increased in proportion with the population increase of the Union due to the latest Union enlargement in 2007.
Glede na informacije, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije, se zdi, da se od objave Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 452/2007 poraba likalnih desk v Uniji ni bistveno spreminjala, nekoliko je narasla le v sorazmerju s povečanjem populacije v Uniji po zadnji širitvi leta 2007.
The estimated Union consumption thus amounted to about 8,5 to 9 million units during the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju je ocenjena potrošnja Unije znašala okrog 8,5 do 9 milijonov enot.
Finally, Since Hardware suggested that the Institutions should have investigated the claims against it by means of a review, and then, in case a duty were imposed upon it and the PRC would successfully challenge this in WTO dispute settlement, remove that duty but only prospectively.
Končno, družba Since Hardware je predlagala, da bi institucije morale preiskati trditve proti družbi s pomočjo pregleda in nato, če bi bila uvedena dajatev, kar bi lahko LRK v reševanju sporov STO uspešno spodbijala, takšno dajatev umakniti, vendar le za naprej.
However, it would clearly be inappropriate to knowingly violate WTO rules, whereas, like in this case, a method of investigating the case can be found which is in line with the basic Regulation, interpreted in light of WTO rules.
Jasno je, da bi bila zavestna kršitev pravil STO neprimerna, ker se lahko, kot v tem primeru, za preiskovanje primera izbere metoda, ki je, razložena v luči pravil STO, v skladu z osnovno uredbo.
Since Hardware
Družba Since Hardware
Therefore, it is possible for and incumbent upon [11] the Institutions to use the flexibility that the word ‘may’ provides, and not to use a review to investigate such claims. The same conclusion has already been drawn in at least one earlier investigation [12].
V vsaj eni predhodni preiskavi [11] je prišlo do enakih sklepov.