natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974 ("Athens Protocol") represents a major improvement to the regime relating to the liability of carriers and the compensation of passengers carried by sea.
Protokol iz leta 2002 k Atenski konvenciji o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Atenski protokol) je bistvena izboljšava ureditve odgovornosti prevoznikov in nadomestil za potnike v pomorskem prometu.
The Athens Protocol modifies the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974 and establishes in Article 15 that the two instruments shall, as between the Parties to the Athens Protocol, be read and interpreted together as one single instrument.
Atenski protokol spreminja Atensko konvencijo o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974 ter v členu 15 določa, da se obe listini med podpisnicami Atenskega protokola bereta in tolmačita kot enotna listina.
Articles 10 and 11 of the Athens Protocol affect Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [1].
Člena 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola vplivata na Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [1].
The Union thus has exclusive competence as regards Articles 10 and 11 of the Athens Protocol.
Unija ima tako izključno pristojnost za področja iz členov 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola.
Upon accession of the Union to the Athens Protocol, the rules on jurisdiction set out in Article 10 thereof should take precedence over the relevant Union rules.
Po pristopu Unije k Atenskemu protokolu bi morala imeti pravila o pristojnosti iz člena 10 Atenskega protokola prednost pred ustreznimi pravili Unije.
However, the rules on recognition and enforcement of judgments laid down in Article 11 of the Athens Protocol should not take precedence either over the relevant rules of the Union, as extended to Denmark by the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [2], or the rules of the Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters of 16 September 1988 [3] or the Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters of 30 October 2007 [4], since the effect of the application of these rules is to ensure that judgments are recognised and enforced at least to the same extent as under the rules of the Athens Protocol.
Vendar pa pravila o priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb iz člena 11 Atenskega protokola ne bi smela imeti prednosti pred ustreznimi pravili Unije, kot so bila s Sporazumom med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [2] razširjena na Dansko, ali pravili Luganske konvencije o pristojnosti in izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah z dne 16. septembra 1988 [3] ali Luganske konvencije o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah z dne 30. oktobra 2007 [4], saj je učinek uporabe teh pravil zagotoviti, da so sodne odločbe priznane in izvršene vsaj v enakem obsegu kot v skladu s pravili Atenskega protokola.
The United Kingdom and Ireland, to which the Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, applies, will be bound as part of the European Union by Articles 10 and 11 of the Athens Protocol.
Združeno kraljestvo in Irska, za katera se uporablja Protokol (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije bosta kot del Evropske unije zavezana k uporabi členov 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application in respect of Articles 10 and 11 of the Athens Protocol.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo glede členov 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
It will be bound by these Articles only as a separate Contracting Party.
K uporabi teh dveh členov je zavezana zgolj kot ločena pogodbenica.
The majority of the rules of the Athens Protocol have been incorporated into Union law by Regulation (EC) No 392/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents [5].
Večina pravil Atenskega protokola je bila vključena v pravo Unije z Uredbo (ES) št. 392/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o odgovornosti prevoznikov potnikov po morju v primeru nesreč [5].
Thus, the Union exerted competence as regards the matters governed by that Regulation.
Tako je Unija izvajala pristojnosti v zvezi z zadevami, ki jih ureja navedena uredba.
The accession of the European Union to the Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974 ("Athens Protocol") is hereby approved on behalf of the European Union as regards Articles 10 and 11 thereof.
Pristop Evropske unije k Protokolu iz leta 2002 k Atenski konvenciji o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Atenski protokol) se v zvezi s členoma 10 in 11 tega protokola odobri v imenu Evropske Unije.
The text of these Articles is reproduced in the Annex.
Besedilo teh dveh členov je navedeno v Prilogi.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person or persons empowered to deposit the instrument of accession of the Union to the Athens Protocol as regards Articles 10 and 11 thereof in accordance with Articles 17(2)(c), 17(3) and 19 of that Protocol.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za deponiranje listine o pristopu Unije k Atenskemu protokolu v zvezi s členoma 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola v skladu s členi 17(2)(c) in 17(3) ter členom 19 navedenega protokola.
At the time of the deposit of the instrument of accession, the Union shall make the following declaration of competence:
Ob deponiranju listine o pristopu Unija predloži naslednjo izjavo o pristojnosti:
At the time of the deposit of the instrument of accession, the Union shall make the following declaration on Article 17bis(3) of the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974, as amended by Article 11 of the Athens Protocol:
Unija ob deponiranju listine o pristopu poda naslednjo izjavo iz člena 17a(3) Atenske konvencije o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974, kot je bil spremenjen s členom 11 Atenskega protokola:
Judgments on matters covered by the Athens Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974, when given by a court of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden or the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, shall be recognised and enforced in a Member State of the European Union in accordance with the relevant rules of the European Union on the subject.
Sodne odločbe o zadevah, zajetih v Atenskem protokolu iz leta 2002 k Atenski konvenciji o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974, ki jih izda sodišče Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Bolgarije, Češke republike, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Republike Estonije, Irske, Helenske republike, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Italijanske republike, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg, Republike Madžarske, Malte, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Avstrije, Republike Poljske, Portugalske republike, Romunije, Republike Slovenije, Slovaške republike, Republike Finske, Kraljevine Švedske ali Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske, se v državah članicah Evropske unije priznavajo in izvršujejo v skladu z ustreznimi pravili Evropske unije o zadevi.
Judgments on matters covered by the Athens Protocol, when given by a court of the Kingdom of Denmark, shall be recognised and enforced in a Member State of the European Union in accordance with the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.
Sodne odločbe o zadevah, zajetih v Atenskem protokolu, ki jih izda sodišče Kraljevine Danske, se v državah članicah Evropske unije priznavajo in izvršujejo v skladu s Sporazumom med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
Judgments on matters covered by the Athens Protocol, when given by a court of a third State
Sodne odločbe o zadevah, zajetih v Atenskem protokolu, ki jih izda sodišče tretje države,
bound by the Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters of 30 October 2007 shall be recognised and enforced in the Member States of the European Union in accordance with that Convention;
ki jo zavezuje Luganska konvencija o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah z dne 30. oktobra 2007, se v državah članicah Evropske unije priznavajo in izvršujejo v skladu z navedeno konvencijo;
bound by the Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters of 16 September 1988 shall be recognised and enforced in the Member States of the European Union in accordance with that Convention.".
ki jo zavezuje Luganska konvencija o pristojnosti in izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah z dne 16. septembra 1988, se v državah članicah Evropske unije priznavajo in izvršujejo v skladu z navedeno konvencijo."
The person or persons designated under paragraph 1 of this Article shall make the reservation contained in the IMO Guidelines when depositing the instrument of accession of the Union to the Athens Protocol as regards Articles 10 and 11 thereof.
Oseba ali osebe, imenovane v skladu z odstavkom 1 tega člena, pridržek iz smernic IMO podajo ob deponiranju listine o pristopu Unije k Atenskemu protokolu v zvezi s členoma 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola.
The Union shall deposit its instrument of accession to the Athens Protocol as regards Articles 10 and 11 thereof by 31 December 2011.
Unija listino o pristopu k Atenskemu protokolu v zvezi s členoma 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola deponira do 31. decembra 2011.
OJ L 319, 25.11.1988, p. 9.
UL L 319, 25.11.1988, str. 9.
ANNEX
PREVOD
ARTICLES 10 AND 11 OF THE PROTOCOL OF 2002 TO THE ATHENS CONVENTION RELATING TO THE CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS AND THEIR LUGGAGE BY SEA, 1974
ČLENA 10 IN 11 PROTOKOLA IZ LETA 2002 K ATENSKI KONVENCIJI O PREVOZU POTNIKOV IN NJIHOVE PRTLJAGE PO MORJU IZ LETA 1974
Article 17 of the Convention is replaced by the following text:
Člen 17 Konvencije se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Competent jurisdiction
Pristojni sodni organ
An action arising under Articles 3 and 4 of this Convention shall, at the option of the claimant, be brought before one of the courts listed below, provided that the court is located in a State Party to this Convention, and subject to the domestic law of each State Party governing proper venue within those States with multiple possible forums:
Tožbeni zahtevek v skladu s členoma 3 in 4 te konvencije se po izbiri tožnika vloži pri enem izmed spodaj naštetih sodišč, pod pogojem, da se navedeno sodišče nahaja v državi pogodbenici Konvencije, v državah, v katerih ima sodno pristojnost več sodišč, pa zanj velja nacionalna zakonodaja vsake države pogodbenice v zvezi s krajevno pristojnostjo:
the court of the State of permanent residence or principal place of business of the defendant, or
sodišče države stalnega prebivališča ali glavnega kraja poslovanja toženca ali
the court of the State of departure or that of the destination according to the contract of carriage, or
sodišče države odhoda ali prihoda v skladu s prevozno pogodbo ali
the court of the State of the domicile or permanent residence of the claimant, if the defendant has a place of business and is subject to jurisdiction in that State, or
sodišče države začasnega ali stalnega bivališča tožnika, če ima toženec kraj poslovanja podjetja v tej državi in je zanj pristojna ta država, ali
the court of the State where the contract of carriage was made, if the defendant has a place of business and is subject to jurisdiction in that State.
sodišče države sklenitve prevozne pogodbe, če ima toženec kraj poslovanja podjetja v tej državi in je zanj pristojna ta država.
Actions under Article 4bis of this Convention shall, at the option of the claimant, be brought before one of the courts where action could be brought against the carrier or performing carrier according to paragraph 1.
Tožbeni zahtevki v skladu s členom 4a te konvencije se po izbiri tožnika vložijo pri enem izmed sodišč, kjer je zahtevek skladno z odstavkom 1 mogoče vložiti zoper prevoznika ali prevoznika izvajalca.
After the occurrence of the incident which has caused the damage, the parties may agree that the claim for damages shall be submitted to any jurisdiction or to arbitration.’.
Po nesreči, ki je povzročila škodo, se stranki lahko dogovorita, da se odškodninski zahtevek vloži pri katerem koli sodišču ali arbitraži.“
The following text is added as Article 17bis of the Convention:
V Konvenciji se doda naslednji člen 17a:
‘Article 17bis
„Člen 17a
Any judgment given by a court with jurisdiction in accordance with Article 17 which is enforceable in the State of origin where it is no longer subject to ordinary forms of review, shall be recognised in any State Party, except
Vsaka sodba sodišča s pristojnostjo v skladu s členom 17, ki je izvršljiva v matični državi in proti njej ni več rednih pravnih sredstev, se priznava v vseh državah pogodbenicah, razen:
where the judgment was obtained by fraud; or
če je bila pridobljena s prevaro; ali
where the defendant was not given reasonable notice and a fair opportunity to present the case.
če toženec ni bil obveščen v razumnem času in ni imel prave možnosti, da predstavi zadevo.
A judgment recognised under paragraph 1 shall be enforceable in each State Party as soon as the formalities required in that State have been complied with.
Sodba, priznana v skladu z odstavkom 1, je izvršljiva v vsaki državi pogodbenici takoj, ko so izpolnjene vse formalnosti, ki se zahtevajo v tej državi.
A State Party to this Protocol may apply other rules for the recognition and enforcement of judgments, provided that their effect is to ensure that judgments are recognised and enforced at least to the same extent as under paragraphs 1 and 2.’.
Država pogodbenica tega protokola lahko za priznanje in izvršitev sodnih odločb uporabi druga pravila, če s tem zagotovi, da so odločbe priznane in izvršene vsaj v enakem obsegu, kot je določeno v odstavkih 1 in 2.“
"As regards matters covered by Articles 10 and 11 of the Athens Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea, 1974, which come under Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Member States of the European Union, with the exception of the Kingdom of Denmark, in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, have conferred competences to the Union.
"Države članice Evropske unije z izjemo Kraljevine Danske v skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št.22) o stališču Danske, priloženega k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, so svoje pristojnosti v zvezi z zadevami, ki so urejene v členih 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola iz leta 2002 k Atenski konvenciji o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974, ki spadajo v področje uporabe člena 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, prenesle na Unijo.
The Union exercised this competence by adopting Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.".
Unija je to pristojnost uveljavila s sprejetjem Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah."
of 11 January 2012
z dne 11. januarja 2012
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of vinyl acetate originating in the United States of America and releasing the amounts secured by way of the provisional duties imposed
o ustavitvi protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom vinilacetata s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike in sprostitvi zneskov, zavarovanih z uvedbo začasne dajatve
Initiation of the proceeding and imposition of provisional measures
Začetek postopka in uvedba začasnih ukrepov
On 22 October 2010, the Commission received a complaint pursuant to Article 5 of the Basic Regulation, concerning alleged injurious dumping by imports of vinyl acetate (hereinafter ‘the product concerned’) origination in the United States of America (USA).
Komisija je 22. oktobra 2010 v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe prejela pritožbo o domnevnem škodljivem dampingu uvoza vinilacetata („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike („ZDA“).
The complaint was lodged by Ineos Oxide Ltd (the complainant) representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 % of the total Union industry production of the product concerned.
Pritožbo je vložila družba Ineos Oxide Ltd („pritožnik“), ki predstavlja glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka industrije Unije.
On 4 December 2010, the Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of vinyl acetate originating in the USA.
Komisija je 4. decembra 2010 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom vinilacetata s poreklom iz ZDA v Unijo.
The Commission, by Regulation (EU) No 821/2011 [3] (the provisional Regulation), imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of vinyl acetate currently falling within CN code 29153200 and originating in the USA.
Komisija je z Uredbo (EU) št. 821/2011 [3] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz vinilacetata, trenutno uvrščenega pod tarifno oznako KN 29153200 in s poreklom iz ZDA.
WITHDRAWAL OF THE COMPLAINT AND TERMINATION OF THE PROCEDING
UMIK PRITOŽBE IN USTAVITEV POSTOPKA
By a letter of 4 November 2011 to the Commission, the complainant formally withdrew its complaint.
Pritožnik je v pismu Komisiji z dne 4. novembra 2011 uradno umaknil svojo pritožbo.
In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, the proceeding may be terminated where the complaint is withdrawn, unless such termination would not be in the Union interest.
V skladu s členom 9(1) osnovne uredbe se postopek lahko ustavi, če se pritožba umakne, razen če takšna ustavitev ne bi bila v interesu Unije.
No comments were received indicating that such termination would not be in the Union interest.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb, ki bi kazale, da takšna ustavitev ni v interesu Unije.
Following disclosure, one party argued that it should not have been excluded from the definition of the Union industry or that, alternatively, the provisional Regulation should be amended so as to include the party in that definition.
Po razkritju je ena stran trdila, da ne bi smela biti izključena iz opredelitve industrije Unije ali pa, da je treba spremeniti začasno uredbo tako, da bo ta stran vključena v navedeno opredelitev.
In this respect, it should be pointed out that the findings of the provisional Regulation, on the basis of information obtained in the course of the investigation, were only provisional, as stated in recital 31 of the provisional Regulation itself.
Glede na to je treba poudariti, da so bile na podlagi informacij, pridobljenih med preiskavo, ugotovitve iz začasne uredbe začasne, kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 31 začasne uredbe.
As the anti-dumping proceedings are terminated without the imposition of definitive measures, following the withdrawal of the complaint, it is not appropriate, in a terminating decision, neither to provide definitive determinations nor to amend a provisional Regulation.
Ker so protidampinški postopki ustavljeni brez uvedbe dokončnih ukrepov in po umiku pritožbe, ni primerno, da se v ukrepu o ustavitvi določijo dokončne ugotovitve ali spremeni začasna uredba.
It is recalled that the findings at hand were provisional in nature.
Poudariti je treba, da so bile ugotovitve začasne.
It follows that any future case relating to the product or the parties concerned by this proceeding will be assessed on its own merits.
Zato bo kakršen koli prihodnji primer v zvezi z izdelkom ali stranmi, vključenimi v ta postopek, obravnavan na podlagi lastnih ugotovitev.
The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of the product concerned originating in the USA should be terminated without the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je treba protidampinški postopek za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz ZDA v Unijo ustaviti brez uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
Any duties provisionally secured on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 821/2011 should be released,
Vse dajatve, začasno zavarovane na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 821/2011, se sprostijo –
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of vinyl acetate, currently falling within CN code 29153200 and originating in the United States of America, is hereby terminated without the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom vinilacetata, trenutno uvrščenim pod oznako KN 29153200 in s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike, se ustavi brez uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
Regulation (EU) No 821/2011 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (EU) št. 821/2011 se razveljavi.
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 821/2011 on imports of vinyl acetate currently falling within CN code 29153200 and originating in the United States of America shall be released.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 821/2011 za uvoz vinilacetata, trenutno uvrščenega pod oznako KN 29153200 in s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike, se sprostijo.
Done at Brussels, 11 January 2012.
V Bruslju, 11. januarja 2012
OJ L 209, 17.8.2011, p. 24.
UL L 209, 17.8.2011, str. 24.
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije [1] in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) PDEU,