natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘In the case referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 4(1), where the transponder does not comply with the requirements set out in Annex Ia, the owner or the natural person responsible for the pet animal on behalf of the owner must provide the means necessary for reading the transponder at the time of any inspection.’;
„V primeru iz točke (b) prvega pododstavka člena 4(1) mora lastnik ali fizična oseba, ki je v imenu lastnika odgovorna za hišno žival, priskrbeti potrebna sredstva za branje transponderja ob vsakem pregledu, če transponder ne ustreza zahtevam iz Priloge Ia.“.
Until 31 December 2011, Finland, Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom, as regards echinococcosis, and Ireland, Malta and the United Kingdom, as regards ticks, may make the entry of pet animals into their territory subject to compliance with the special rules applicable on the date of entry into force of this Regulation.’;
Do 31. decembra 2011 lahko Finska, Irska, Malta, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo, kar zadeva ehinokokozo, ter Irska, Malta in Združeno kraljestvo, kar zadeva klope, zahtevajo za vstop hišnih živali na svoje ozemlje izpolnjevanje posebnih pravil, ki se uporabljajo na dan začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.“.
In order to take account of technical progress, the Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 19b and subject to the conditions of Articles 19c and 19d, amendments to the technical requirements for the identification as laid down in Annex Ia.
Komisija lahko zaradi upoštevanja tehničnega napredka z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členom 19b in ob upoštevanju pogojev iz členov 19c in 19d sprejme spremembe tehničnih zahtev za identifikacijo, kot je določeno v Prilogi Ia.
In order to take account of scientific and technical developments regarding anti-rabies vaccination, the Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 19b and subject to the conditions of Articles 19c and 19d, amendments to the technical requirements for the anti-rabies vaccination as laid down in Annex Ib.
Komisija lahko z namenom upoštevanja znanstvenega in tehničnega napredka pri cepljenju proti steklini z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členom 19b in ob upoštevanju pogojev iz členov 19c in 19d sprejme spremembe tehničnih zahtev za cepljenje proti steklini, kot je določeno v Prilogi Ib.
When adopting such delegated acts, the Commission shall act in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.
Komisija pri sprejemanju takšnih delegiranih aktov ravna v skladu z določbami te uredbe.
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 19c and 19d.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov je prenešeno na Komisijo pod pogoji, določenimi v členih 19c in 19d.
Article 19c
Člen 19c
The delegation of powers referred to in Article 5(1) and Article 19a may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Pooblastilo iz člena 5(1) in člena 19a lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
Article 19d
Člen 19d
The institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.’;
Institucija, ki nasprotuje, navede razloge za nasprotovanje delegiranemu aktu.“.
Annexes Ia and Ib, as set out in the Annex to this Regulation, are inserted.
Vstavita se prilogi Ia in Ib, kot je določeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
OJ C 318, 23.12.2009, p. 121.
UL C 318, 23.12.2009, str. 121.
Position of the European Parliament of 9 March 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 26 April 2010.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. marca 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem Listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 26. aprila 2010.
The EFSA Journal (2006) 436, p. 1.
EFSA Journal [Bilten EFSA] (2006) 436, str. 1.
The EFSA Journal (2006) 441, p. 1.
EFSA Journal [Bilten EFSA] (2006) 441, str. 1.
The EFSA Journal (2007) 469, p. 1.
EFSA Journal [Bilten EFSA] (2007) 469, str. 1.
Technical requirements for the identification
Tehnične zahteve za identifikacijo
For the purposes of Article 4(1), the standard electronic identification system shall be a read-only passive radio frequency identification device (“transponder”):
Standardni elektronski identifikacijski sistem je za namene člena 4(1) bralna identifikacijska naprava s pasivno radijsko frekvenco (‚transponder‘):
complying with ISO Standard 11784 and applying HDX or FDX-B technology;
ki je v skladu s standardom ISO 11784 in uporablja tehnologijo HDX ali FDX-B;
capable of being read by a reading device compatible with ISO Standard 11785.
ki se lahko prebere z bralno napravo, združljivo s standardom ISO 11785.
For the purposes of Article 5(1), an anti-rabies vaccination shall be considered valid provided that the following requirements are complied with:
Cepljenje proti steklini za namene člena 5(1) se šteje za veljavno, če je v skladu z naslednjimi zahtevami:
The anti-rabies vaccine must:
Cepivo proti steklini mora:
be a vaccine other than a live modified vaccine and fall within one of the following categories:
biti cepivo, ki ni živo modificirano cepivo in spada v eno izmed naslednjih kategorij:
an inactivated vaccine of at least one antigenic unit per dose (WHO standard); or
inaktivirano cepivo z najmanj eno antigensko enoto na odmerek (standard WHO); ali
a recombinant vaccine expressing the immunising glycoprotein of the rabies virus in a live virus vector;
rekombinantno cepivo, ki izraža imunizirajoči glikoprotein virusa stekline v živem virusnem vektorju;
if administered in a Member State, have been granted a marketing authorisation in accordance with:
če je uporabljeno v državi članici, imeti dovoljenje za promet v skladu z:
Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products; or
Direktivo 2001/82/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini; ali
Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency;
Uredbo (ES) št. 726/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o postopkih Skupnosti za pridobitev dovoljenja za promet in nadzor zdravil za humano in veterinarsko uporabo ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za zdravila;
if administered in a third country, meet at least the requirements laid down in Part C of Chapter 2.1.13 of the Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, 2008 Edition, of the World Organisation for Animal Health.
če je uporabljeno v tretji državi, izpolnjevati vsaj zahteve iz dela C poglavja 2.1.13 Priročnika diagnostičnih testov in cepiv za kopenske živali Svetovne organizacije za zdravje živali, izdaja 2008.
An anti-rabies vaccination may only be considered valid if it meets the following conditions:
Cepljenje proti steklini se šteje za veljavno le, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the vaccine was administered on a date indicated in:
cepivo je bilo uporabljeno na dan, naveden v:
Section IV of the passport; or
oddelek IV potnega lista; ali
the appropriate section of the accompanying animal health certificate;
ustrezni oddelek spremnega veterinarskega spričevala;
the date referred to in point (a) must not precede the date of microchipping indicated in:
datum iz točke (a) ne sme biti predhoden datumu mikročipiranja iz:
Section III(2) of the passport; or
oddelka III(2) potnega lista; ali
at least 21 days must have elapsed since the completion of the vaccination protocol required by the manufacturer for the primary vaccination in accordance with the technical specification of the marketing authorisation referred to in point 1(b) for the anti-rabies vaccine in the Member State or third country in which the vaccination is administered;
preteči mora vsaj 21 dni od datuma zaključka postopka cepljenja, ki ga proizvajalec zahteva za primarno cepljenje v skladu s tehničnimi specifikacijami dovoljenja za promet iz točke 1(b) za cepivo proti steklini v državi članici ali tretji državi, v kateri se cepivo uporablja;
the period of validity of the vaccination, as prescribed in the technical specification of the marketing authorisation for the anti-rabies vaccine in the Member State or third country where the vaccine is administered, must have been entered by the authorised veterinarian in:
obdobje veljavnosti cepljenja, kakor je bilo določeno v tehnični specifikaciji dovoljenja za promet za cepivo proti steklini v državi članici ali tretji državi, v kateri se cepivo uporablja, mora pooblaščeni veterinar vnesti v:
a revaccination (booster) must be considered a primary vaccination if it was not carried out within the period of validity referred to in point (d) of a previous vaccination.
ponovno cepljenje (obnovitvena doza (booster)) se šteje za primarno cepljenje, če ni opravljeno v obdobju veljavnosti iz točke (d) predhodnega cepljenja.
The European Parliament, Council and Commission declare that the provisions of this Regulation shall be without prejudice to any future position of the institutions as regards the implementation of Article 290 TFEU or individual legislative acts containing such provisions.
Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija izjavljajo, da določbe te uredbe ne vplivajo na nobeno prihodnje stališče institucij glede izvajanja člena 290 PDEU ali na posamezne zakonodajne akte, ki vsebujejo omenjene določbe.
The Commission has the intention to propose a revision of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 in its entirety before 30 June 2011, and, in particular, the aspects of delegated and implementing acts.
Komisija namerava pred 30. junijem 2011 predlagati popolno revizijo Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003, zlasti vidikov, povezanih z delegiranimi in izvedbenimi akti.
The European Commission takes note that except in cases where the legislative act provides for an urgency procedure, the European Parliament and the Council consider that the notification of delegated acts, shall take into account the periods of recess of the institutions (winter, summer and European elections), in order to ensure that the European Parliament and the Council are able to exercise their prerogatives within the time limits laid down in the relevant legislative acts, and is ready to act accordingly.
Evropska komisija je seznanjena z mnenjem Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, da je treba pri uradnem obveščanju o delegiranih aktih – razen v primerih, ko zakonodajni akt predpisuje nujni postopek – upoštevati obdobja počitnic institucij (zimske in poletne počitnice, evropske volitve), ter s tem Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu omogočiti, da izvajata svoja pooblastila v rokih, določenih v ustreznih zakonodajnih aktih, ter je pripravljena ravnati v skladu s tem.
The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Article 5(1) and Article 19a shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years following 18 June 2010.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 5(1) in člena 19a se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje petih let z začetkom 18. junija 2010. Komisija pripravi poročilo o pooblastilu najpozneje šest mesecev pred koncem petletnega obdobja.
The Commission shall make a report in respect of the delegated powers not later than 6 months before the end of the 5 year period. The delegation of powers shall be automatically extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council revokes it in accordance with Article 19c.
Prenos pooblastila se samodejno podaljša za enako obdobje, razen če Evropski parlament ali Svet pooblastilo prekliče v skladu s členom 19c.
Regulation (EU) No 439/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 439/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a European Asylum Support Office
o ustanovitvi Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 74 and Article 78(1) and (2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 74 in člena 78(1) in (2) Pogodbe,
The policy of the Union on the Common European Asylum System (the CEAS) is designed, under the terms of the Hague Programme, to establish a common asylum area by means of an effective harmonised procedure consistent with the values and humanitarian tradition of the European Union.
Politika Unije o skupnem evropskem azilnem sistemu (CEAS) je ob upoštevanju določb Haaškega programa zasnovana tako, da se bo z učinkovitim usklajenim postopkom v skladu z vrednotami in humanitarno tradicijo Evropske unije vzpostavilo skupno azilno območje.
Much progress has been made in recent years towards the establishment of the CEAS thanks to the introduction of common minimum standards.
V zadnjih letih je bil zahvaljujoč uvedbi skupnih minimalnih standardov dosežen precejšen napredek pri vzpostavitvi CEAS.
There remain great disparities between the Member States, however, in the granting of international protection and the forms that such international protection takes.
Vendar med državami članicami še obstajajo velike razlike pri zagotavljanju mednarodne zaščite in pri oblikah te mednarodne zaščite.
Those disparities should be reduced.
Te razlike bi bilo treba zmanjšati.
In its Policy Plan on Asylum, adopted in June 2008, the Commission announced its intention to develop the CEAS by proposing a revision of existing legal instruments in order to achieve greater harmonisation of the applicable standards and by strengthening support for practical cooperation between the Member States, in particular by a legislative proposal to establish a European Asylum Support Office (the Support Office) in order to increase coordination of operational cooperation between Member States so that the common rules are implemented effectively.
Komisija je v načrtu politike azila, ki ga je sprejela junija 2008, napovedala, da si bo prizadevala za razvoj CEAS in v ta namen predlagala revizijo obstoječih zakonodajnih instrumentov, da se zagotovi večja usklajenost veljavnih standardov, in okrepila podporo praktičnemu sodelovanju med državami članicami, zlasti s predložitvijo zakonodajnega predloga za ustanovitev Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podporni urad), da bi se okrepila koordinacija operativnega sodelovanja med državami članicami, namenjenega učinkovitemu izvajanju skupnih pravil.
In the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum, adopted in September 2008, the European Council solemnly reiterated that any persecuted foreigner is entitled to obtain aid and protection on the territory of the European Union in application of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967, and other relevant treaties.
(4) Evropski svet je v Evropskem paktu o priseljevanju in azilu, sprejetem septembra 2008, znova slovesno poudaril, da ima vsak preganjani tujec pravico do pomoči in zaščite na ozemlju Evropske unije v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo o statusu beguncev z dne 28. julija 1951, kakor je bila spremenjena z newyorškim protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967, in drugimi ustreznimi pogodbami.
It was also expressly agreed that a European support office would be established in 2009.
Prav tako je bilo izrecno dogovorjeno, da se ustanovi evropski podporni urad leta 2009.
Practical cooperation on asylum aims to increase convergence and ensure ongoing quality of Member States' decision-making procedures in that area within a European legislative framework.
Namen sodelovanja v praksi na področju azila je povečati zbliževanje in zagotoviti stalno kakovost postopkov odločanja držav članic na tem področju znotraj evropskega zakonodajnega okvira.
A substantial number of practical cooperation measures has already been undertaken in recent years, notably the adoption of a common approach to information on countries of origin and the establishment of a common European asylum curriculum.
V zadnjih letih so se že začeli izvajati številni ukrepi sodelovanja v praksi, zlasti sprejetje skupnega pristopa k informacijam o državah izvora in vzpostavitev skupnega evropskega programa usposabljanja na področju azila.
The Support Office should take due account of those cooperation measures and the lessons learnt therefrom.
Podporni urad bi moral ustrezno upoštevati ukrepe sodelovanja in iz njih pridobljene izkušnje.
For Member States which are faced with specific and disproportionate pressures on their asylum and reception systems, due in particular to their geographical or demographic situation, the Support Office should support the development of solidarity within the Union to promote a better relocation of beneficiaries of international protection between Member States, while ensuring that asylum and reception systems are not abused.
V državah članicah, katerih azilni sistemi in sistemi za sprejem so posebej in nesorazmerno obremenjeni, kar je zlasti posledica njihovega geografskega položaja ali demografskih razmer, bi moral podporni urad podpirati razvijanje solidarnosti znotraj Unije, s čimer bi spodbujali boljšo preseljevanje upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite med državami članicami, pri čemer je treba zagotoviti, da azilni sistemi in sistemi za sprejem ne postanejo predmet zlorab.
In order to best fulfil its mandate, the Support Office should be independent in technical matters and should enjoy legal, administrative and financial autonomy.
Da bo podporni urad kar najbolje izvajal svoj mandat, bi moral biti neodvisen, kar zadeva tehnična vprašanja, in pravno, upravno in finančno samostojen.
To that end, the Support Office should be a body of the Union having legal personality and exercising the implementing powers conferred upon it by this Regulation.
Podporni urad bi zato moral biti organ Unije, ki ima pravno osebnost in ki izvaja izvedbena pooblastila, podeljena s to uredbo.
The Support Office should work in close cooperation with Member States'asylum authorities, with national immigration and asylum services and other services, drawing on the capacity and expertise of those services, and with the Commission.
Podporni urad bi moral tesno sodelovati z azilnimi organi držav članic, nacionalnimi službami za azil in priseljevanje in drugimi službami ter se pri tem opreti na zmogljivosti in strokovno znanje teh služb, in s Komisijo.
Member States should cooperate with the Support Office to ensure that it is able to fulfil its mandate.
Države članice bi morale sodelovati s podpornim uradom, da bi zagotovile uresničevanje njegovega mandata.
The Support Office should also act in close cooperation with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (the UNHCR) and, where appropriate, with relevant international organisations in order to benefit from their expertise and support.
Podporni urad bi moral tesno sodelovati tudi z Visokim komisarjem ZN za begunce (UNHCR) in po potrebi z ustreznimi mednarodnimi organizacijami, da bi izkoristil njihovo strokovno znanje in izkušnje ter pomoč.
To that end, the roles of the UNHCR and the other relevant international organisations should be fully recognised and those organisations should be fully involved in the work of the Support Office.
Vlogo UNHCR in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij bi bilo treba v ta namen v celoti priznati, te organizacije pa v celoti vključiti v delo podpornega urada.
Any financial resources made available by the Support Office to the UNHCR in accordance with this Regulation should not result in double financing of the UNHCR's activities with other international or national sources.
Finančna sredstva, ki jih podporni urad da na voljo UNHCR v skladu s to uredbo, ne bi smela povzročiti dvojnega financiranja dejavnosti UNHCR iz drugih mednarodnih ali nacionalnih virov.
Furthermore, to fulfil its purpose, and to the extent required for the fulfilment of its duties, the Support Office should cooperate with other bodies of the Union, in particular with the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex), established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 [2], and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), established by Council Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 [3].
Poleg tega bi moral podporni urad za uresničevanje njegovega namena in v obsegu, potrebnem za izpolnjevanje njegovih nalog, sodelovati z drugimi organi Unije, zlasti Evropsko agencijo za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije (Frontex), ki je bila ustanovljena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2004 [2], ter Agencijo Evropske unije za temeljne pravice (FRA), ki je bila ustanovljena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 168/2007 [3].
The Support Office should cooperate with the European Migration Network, established by Council Decision 2008/381/EC [4], in order to avoid duplication of activities.
Da bi se izognili podvajanju dejavnosti, bi moral podporni urad svoje dejavnosti usklajevati tudi z Evropsko migracijsko mrežo, ustanovljeno z Odločbo Sveta 2008/381/ES [4].
The Support Office should also maintain a close dialogue with civil society with a view to exchanging information and pooling knowledge in the field of asylum.
Podporni urad bi moral tudi vzdrževati tesen dialog z organizacijami civilne družbe zaradi izmenjave informacij in zbiranja znanja na področju azila.
The Support Office should be a European centre of expertise on asylum, responsible for facilitating, coordinating and strengthening practical cooperation among Member States on the many aspects of asylum, so that Member States are better able to provide international protection to those entitled, while dealing fairly and efficiently with those who do not qualify for international protection,where appropriate.
Podporni urad bi moral delovati kot evropsko središče za strokovno znanje in izkušnje na področju azila, pristojno za spodbujanje, koordinacijo in krepitev različnih oblik praktičnega sodelovanja med državami članicami na področju azila, da bi države članice lahko bolje zagotavljale mednarodno zaščito osebam, ki so do nje upravičene, obenem pa ustrezno in učinkovito obravnavale osebe, ki do mednarodne zaščite niso upravičeni, kadar je to primerno.
The Support Office's mandate should be focused on three major duties, namely contributing to the implementation of the CEAS, supporting practical cooperation among Member States on asylum and supporting Member States that are subject to particular pressure.
Mandat podpornega urada bi moral biti osredotočen na tri glavne naloge, in sicer prispevek k izvajanju CEAS, podpora praktičnemu sodelovanju med državami članicami na področju azila in podpora državam članicam, ki se soočajo s posebnimi obremenitvami.
The Support Office should have no direct or indirect powers in relation to the taking of decisions by Member States' asylum authorities on individual applications for international protection.
Podporni urad ne bi smel imeti nobenih neposrednih ali posrednih pristojnosti v zvezi s sprejemanjem odločitev azilnih organov držav članic glede posameznih prošenj za mednarodno zaščito.
In order to provide and/or coordinate the provision of speedy and effective operational support to Member States subject to particular pressure on their asylum and reception systems, the Support Office should, at the request of the Member States concerned, coordinate action to support those Member States inter alia through the deployment in their territories of asylum support teams made up of asylum experts.
Da se državam članicam, katerih azilni sistemi in sistemi za sprejem so posebej obremenjeni, zagotovi hitra in učinkovita operativna pomoč in/ali se usklajuje zagotavljanje te pomoči, bi moral podporni urad na zahtevo zadevnih držav članic usklajevati ukrepe za pomoč tem državam članicam, med drugim z napotitvijo podpornih skupin za azil, ki jih sestavljajo strokovnjaki s tega področja, na njihovih ozemljih.