natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
either [II.2.6. were collected/produced (1) in the exporting country (5), which according to official findings is free from Akabane disease and Aino disease;]
ali [II.2.6 so bili odvzeti/pridobljeni (1) v državi izvoznici (1), ki je po uradnih ugotovitvah prosta bolezni Akabane in bolezni Aino;]
or [II.2.6. were collected/produced (1) in the exporting country (5) and were not subjected to penetration of the zona pellucida, and the donor females underwent a serum neutralisation test for Akabane virus and Aino virus carried out on a blood sample taken not less than 21 days following their collection and giving negative results;]
ali [II.2.6 so bili odvzeti/pridobljeni (1) v državi izvoznici (5) in ovojnica ni bila poškodovana, živali dajalke pa so bile testirane s testom nevtralizacije seruma za virus Akabane in virus Aino z negativnim rezultatom, izvedenim na vzorcu krvi, odvzetim ne manj kot 21 dni po odvzemu;]
either [II.2.7. were collected/produced (1) in the exporting country (5), which according to official findings is free from epizootic haemorrhagic disease (EHD);]
ali [II.2.7 so bili odvzeti/pridobljeni (1) v državi izvoznici (5), ki je po uradnih ugotovitvah prosta epizootične hemoragične bolezni (EHB);]
or [II.2.7. were collected/produced (1) in the exporting country (5) in which according to official findings the following serotypes of epizootic haemorrhagic disease (EHD) exist: … and were tested negative on two occasions not more than 12 months apart in an agar gel immunodiffusion test or competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (6) and a virus neutralisation test for all above listed serotypes of EHD, carried out in approved laboratory on samples of blood taken prior to and not less than 21 days following collection of the ova/embryos (1);]
ali [II.2.7 so bili odvzeti/pridobljeni (1) v državi izvoznici (5) v kateri so po uradnih ugotovitvah naslednji serotipi epizootične hemoragične bolezni (EHB): … in so bili dvakrat testirani z negativnim rezultatom v razmiku manj kot 12 mesecev z imunodifuzijskim testom v agarskem gelu ali kompetitivnim encimskoimunskim testom (6) in testom nevtralizacije virusa za vse navedene serotipe EHB, ki je bil izveden v odobrenem laboratoriju na vzorcih krvi, odvzetih pred odvzemom jajčnih celic/zarodkov (1) in ne manj kot 21 dni po odvzemu;]
either [II.2.8. meet the requirements of Chapter A(I) of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001;]
ali [II.2.8 izpolnjujejo zahteve iz poglavja A(I) Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001;]
or [II.2.8. meet the requirements of Chapter A(I) of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 and are destined for a Member State which benefits, for all or part of its territory, from the provisions laid down in point (b) or (c) of Chapter A(I) of Annex VIII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 and the donor animals comply regarding scrapie with the guarantees provided for by the programmes referred to in that point and with the guarantees (7) requested by the Member State of destination;]
ali [II.2.8 izpolnjuje zahteve iz poglavja A(I) Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 in so namenjeni v državo članico, ki v celoti ali na delu svojega ozemlja uporablja določbe iz točke (b) ali (c) poglavja A(I) Priloge VIII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 in živali dajalke izpolnjujejo zahteve v zvezi s praskavcem, tj. z jamstvi iz programov iz navedene točke in jamstvi (7) ki jih zahteva namembna država članica;]
were collected/produced (1) after the date on which the embryo collection team was approved by the competent authority of the exporting country;
so bili odvzeti/pridobljeni (1) po datumu, ko je skupino za zbiranje zarodkov odobril pristojni organ države izvoznice;
were processed and stored under approved conditions for at least 30 days immediately after their collection/production (1) and transported under conditions which satisfy the terms laid down in Chapter III(II) of Annex D to Directive 92/65/EEC;
so bili pripravljeni in skladiščeni pod odobrenimi pogoji najmanj 30 dni neposredno po odvzemu/pridobivanju (1) in prevoženi pod pogoji, ki so v skladu s poglavjem III(II) Priloge D k Direktivi 92/65/EGS;
were sent to the place of loading in a sealed container in accordance with point 6 of Chapter III(II) of Annex D to Directive 92/65/EEC and bearing the number detailed in Box I.23.
so bili poslani v kraj natovarjanja v zapečatenem kontejnerju v skladu s točko 6 poglavja III(II) Priloge D k Direktivi 92/65/EGS, označenem s številko iz rubrike I.23;
were conceived by artificial insemination/as a result of in vitro fertilisation (1) using semen meeting the requirements of Directive 92/65/EEC and coming from semen collection centres approved in accordance with Article 11(2) and 17(3)(b) respectively of Directive 92/65/EEC and located in a Member State of the European Union or in a third country listed in Annex I to Decision 2010/472/EU (8).
so bili spočeti z umetno osemenitvijo/kot rezultat oploditve in vitro (1) s semenom, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Direktive 92/65/EGS in prihaja iz osemenjevalnih središč za pridobivanje semena, ki so odobrena v skladu s členom 11(2) oz. členom 17(3)(b) Direktive 92/65/EGS in se nahajajo v državi članici Evropske unije ali tretji državi s seznama iz Priloge I k Sklepu 2010/472/EU (8).
Box I.11: place of origin shall correspond to the approved embryo collection team or embryo production team by which the ova/embryos were collected/produced, processed and stored; and listed in accordance with Article 17(3)(b) of Directive 92/65/EEC on the Commission website:
Rubrika I.11: kraj izvora ustreza skupini za zbiranje zarodkov ali skupini za pridobivanje zarodkov, ki je jajčne celice/zarodke odvzela/pridobila, pripravila in skladiščila ter je v skladu s členom 17(3)(b) Direktive 92/65/EGS na seznamu na spletni strani Komisije:
category: specify if in vivo derived embryos, in vivo derived ova, in vitro produced embryos or micromanipulated embryos.
kategorija: navesti, če gre za zarodke, pridobljene in vivo, jajčne celice, pridobljene in vivo, zarodke, pridobljene in vitro, ali mikromanipulirane zarodke.
approval number of the team: shall correspond to the approved embryo collection team or embryo production team by which the ova/embryos were collected/produced, processed and stored; and listed in accordance with Article 17(3)(b) of Directive 92/65/EEC on the Commission website:
številka odobritve skupine: ustreza skupini za zbiranje zarodkov ali skupini za pridobivanje zarodkov, ki je jajčne celice/zarodke odvzela/pridobila, pripravila in skladiščila ter je v skladu s členom 17(3)(b) Direktive 92/65/EGS na seznamu na spletni strani Komisije:
See remarks for exporting country concerned in Annex III to Decision 2010/472/EU.
Glej opombe za zadevno državo izvoznico v Prilogi III k Sklepu 2010/472/EU.
Only approved semen collection centres listed in accordance with Article 11(4) and Article 17(3)(b) of Directive 92/65/EEC on the Commission websites:
Samo odobrena osemenjevalna središča za pridobivanje semena, ki so v skladu s členom 11(4) in členom 17(3)(b) Direktive 92/65/EGS na seznamu na spletni strani Komisije:
In addition, Annex D to Directive 92/65/EEC, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2010 [4], sets out certain new requirements for the commodities which are to apply from 1 September 2010.
Poleg tega Priloga D k Direktivi 92/65/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 176/2010 [4], določa nekatere nove zahteve za blago, ki se uporabljajo od 1. septembra 2010.
It introduces rules concerning semen storage centres and detailed conditions for their approval and supervision.
Uvaja pravila glede osemenjevalnih središč za skladiščenje semena in podrobne pogoje za njihovo odobritev in nadzor.
either [II.6. No antibiotics were added to the semen;]
ali [II.6. semenu niso bili dodani nobeni antibiotiki;]
or [II.6. The following antibiotic or combination of antibiotics was added to produce a concentration in the final diluted semen of not less than (8):
ali [II.6. semenu so bili dodani naslednji antibiotiki ali kombinacija antibiotikov za ustvarjanje koncentracije v zadnji razredčini semena, ki ne presega (8):
on support measures implemented by Spain in the agricultural sector following the increase in fuel prices
o podpornih ukrepih kmetijskemu sektorju, ki jih je izvajala Španija po dvigu cen goriva
(notified under document C(2009) 9971)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 9971)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) [1] in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) Pogodbe,
Having invited interested parties to submit comments in accordance with the above Article, and taking account of such comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo pripombe v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 108(2) PDEU, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter of 29 September 2000, the Spanish authorities notified the European Commission, in accordance with Article 108(3) of the TFEU, of aid measures implemented by Spain to support the agricultural sector following the increase in fuel prices.
Španski organi so z dopisom z dne 29. septembra 2000 v skladu s členom 108(3) PDEU obvestili Evropsko komisijo o ukrepih pomoči kmetijskemu sektorju, ki jih je izvajala Španija po dvigu cen goriva.
By fax of 20 November 2000, the Commission asked for further information.
Komisija je 20. novembra 2000 po telefaksu zahtevala dodatne informacije.
That information was supplied by letters of 9 January and 13 March 2001.
Te informacije je prejela z dopisoma z dne 9. januarja 2001 in 13. marca 2001.
Most of the measures covered by the notification were transferred to the register of non-notified aid measures (Aid NN 19/2001).
Velik del priglašenih ukrepov je bil prenesen v register nepriglašenih pomoči (pomoč NN 19/2001).
Others were entered in the register of notified aid (N 681/A/2000).
Drugi del je bil vpisan v register priglašenih pomoči (N 681/A/2000).
By letter of 11 April 2001, served on 25 April 2001, the Commission notified Spain of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the TFEU concerning some of the measures, and to consider that others did not meet the requirements to fall within the scope of Article 107 of the TFEU.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 11. aprila 2001, vročenim 25. aprila 2001, sporočila Španiji, da bo sprožila postopek iz člena 108(2) PDEU v zvezi z nekaterimi ukrepi, in menila, da nekateri drugi ukrepi ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za uveljavljanje določb člena 107 PDEU.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures concerned.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe o zadevnih ukrepih.
By letters of 6 June and 20 December 2001, Spain sent a series of comments.
Španija je z dopisoma z dne 6. juni ja 2001 in 20. decembra 2001 predložila več pripomb. Komisija je prejela tudi pripombe zainteresiranih strani.
The Commission also received comments from interested parties.
Posredovane so bile Španiji, in ta je imela možnost, odzvati se nanje.
It passed on these comments to Spain, giving it the opportunity to comment on them, and received its comments by letters of 1 and 30 October 2001.
Komisija je njene pripombe prejela z dopisoma z dne 1. in 30. oktobra 2001.
The Commission adopted a final partially negative Decision on 11 December 2002, under Number 2003/293/EC [3].
Komisija je 11. decembra 2002 sprejela delno negativno končno odločbo s številko 2003/293/CE [3].
On 15 April 2003, the Association of Service Station Managers of Madrid (Asociación de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad de Madrid) and the Catalan Federation of Service Stations (Federación Catalana de Estaciones de Servicio) brought an action against the European Commission before the Court of First Instance [4].
Asociación de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad de Madrid in Federación Catalana de Estaciones de Servicio sta 15. aprila 2003 pri Sodišču prve stopnje vložila tožbo zoper Evropsko komisijo [4].
The complainant requested the partial annulment of the Commission Decision.
Pritožnika sta predlagala delno razglasitev ničnosti odločbe Komisije.
In its judgment of 12 December 2006 [5], the Court of First Instance annulled Article 1 of Commission Decision 2003/293/EC, which states that the measures to support agricultural cooperatives laid down by Royal Decree-Law No 10/2000 of 6 October 2000 on emergency support for agriculture, fisheries and transport [6] do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the TFEU.
Sodišče prve stopnje je s sodbo z dne 12. decembra 2006 [5] člen 1 Odločbe Komisije 2003/293/ES razglasilo za ničnega v delu, v katerem je navedeno, da ukrepi pomoči kmetijskim zadrugam, ki jih določa kraljevi zakonodajni odlok št. 10/2000 z dne 6. oktobra 2000 o nujnih ukrepih pomoči kmetijskemu sektorju ter sektorjem ribolova in prometa [6], niso pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
Following the partial annulment of the Decision, the Commission must adopt a new decision concerning the measures referred to in Article 1 of Commission Decision 2003/293/EC as annulled by the Court of First Instance, which it will do by means of this Decision.
Komisija mora po delni razglasitvi ničnosti odločbe sprejeti novo odločbo glede ukrepov iz člena 1 Odločbe 2003/293/ES, ki ga je Sodišče prve stopnje razglasilo za ničnega, kar je naredila s to odločbo.
With regard to the measures referred to in Article 1 of Commission Decision 2003/293/EC that were not annulled by the Court of First Instance [7] and which therefore remain in full force, they are not affected by this Decision.
Ta odločba ne zadeva ukrepov iz člena 1 Odločbe 2003/293/ES, ki jih Sodišče prve stopnje ni razglasilo za nične [7] in ki so torej v celoti veljavni.
Consequently, no further reference will be made to these measures.
V nadaljevanju torej ne bo nobenega sklicevanja na te ukrepe.
The measures referred to in Article 2 of Commission Decision 2003/293/EC [8], as well as in Articles 3, 4 and 5 that follow therefrom, are not affected by this Decision either, and remain in full force.
Ukrepi iz člena 2 Odločbe 2003/293/ES [8] ter členi 3, 4 in 5 prav tako niso predmet te odločbe, saj so v celoti veljavni.
Measures to support agricultural cooperatives
Ukrepi pomoči kmetijskim zadrugam
The notified measures to support agricultural cooperatives are provided for in Article 1 of Royal Decree-Law No 10/2000 on emergency support for agriculture, fisheries and transport [9], which amends Law No 27/1999 of 16 July 1999 on cooperatives [10] and Law No 20/1990 of 19 December 1990 on the tax arrangements applying to cooperatives [11].
Priglašeni ukrepi pomoči kmetijskim zadrugam so določeni v členu 1 kraljevega zakonodajnega odloka št. 10/2000 o nujni pomoči kmetijskemu sektorju, ribištvu in prometu [9], s katerim se uvajajo nekatere spremembe zakona št. 27/1999 z dne 16. julija 1999 o zadrugah [10] in zakona št. 20/1990 z dne 19. decembra 1990 o davčni ureditvi za zadruge [11].
On the one hand, it abolishes the maximum limit of 50 % of turnover imposed on cooperatives for their transactions with non-member third parties without losing their preferential tax treatment as granted by Law No 20/1990 (Article 13(10)) for deliveries of B diesel by agricultural cooperatives to non-member third parties.
Po eni strani se za kmetijske zadruge ukine omejitev v višini 50 % prometa za trgovanje s tretjimi osebami, ki niso člani zadruge, ne da bi zadruge izgubile davčno ugodnost, kot je opredeljena v zakonu št. 20/1990 (člen 13.10), kadar opravljajo dejavnost dobave dizelskega goriva B tretjim osebam, ki niso člani zadruge.
On the other hand, Law No 34/1998 of 7 October 1998 on hydrocarbons [12] has also been amended to waive the requirement that agricultural cooperatives must set up a legal entity to which the general tax arrangements apply if they carry out deliveries of B diesel to non-member third parties.
Po drugi strani se spremeni zakon št. 34/1998 z dne 7. oktobra 1998 o sektorju ogljikovodikov [12], tako da se za kmetijske zadruge odpravi zahteva, da morajo ustanoviti subjekt, ki ima lastno pravno osebnost in za katerega velja splošna davčna ureditev, kadar opravljajo dejavnost distribucije dizelskega goriva B nečlanom zadruge.
The principal objective of these measures was, according to the Spanish authorities, to offset the increase in fuel prices which had hit the agricultural sector hard at the time the measures were adopted.
Po mnenju španskih organov je bil glavni namen teh ukrepov izničiti dvig cen goriva, ki je v času, ko sta bila ukrepa sprejeta, močno prizadel kmetijski sektor.
Thus, in the statement of reasons of Royal Decree-Law No 10/2000, it is stated that ‘diesel used for agriculture, fisheries and transport, like fuels for other uses, is experiencing price increases following the rise in the price of oil and the marked appreciation of the dollar against the euro’.
Tako je v obrazložitvi kraljevega zakonodajnega odloka št. 10/2000 pojasnjeno, da „je dizelsko gorivo, ki se uporablja v kmetijstvu, ribolovu in prometu, ter goriva za drugačno uporabo prizadel dvig cen zaradi višjih cen nafte in precejšnje rasti vrednosti dolarja v primerjavi z eurom“.
The Spanish Government, ‘aware of the real significance of this crisis caused by external factors, analysed the scale of the economic impact in the agricultural and fisheries sector with organisations that best represented these sectors, and obtained overwhelming consensus on the adoption of a package of measures designed to offset the negative effect of the increase in oil prices and to increase the liberalisation of the sectors’.
Španska vlada „razume stvarnost krize, ki so jo povzročili zunanji dejavniki, in je skupaj z najbolj reprezentativnimi organizacijami prizadetih sektorjev proučila obseg ekonomskega vpliva na kmetijstvo in ribištvo ter dosegla široko soglasje o sprejetju svežnja ukrepov za omilitev negativnih posledic zvišanja cen nafte in poglobitev liberalizacije sektorjev“.
With regard to the scope of the Laws amended by the notified measure, a more detailed description is necessary.
Glede obsega zakonov, spremenjenih s priglašenim ukrepom, je potreben natančnejši opis.
Law No 27/1999 on cooperatives is the instrument which governs cooperative activity in Spain.
Zakon št. 27/1999 o zadrugah je okvirni instrument za zadružniško dejavnost v Španiji.
It defines the concept of a cooperative society, classifies the types of cooperative society and regulates their formation.
V njem so opredeljeni pojem zadruga in njene kategorije ter je urejena njena ustanovitev.
Its aims also include the promotion and development of cooperative societies and it describes their forms of association, whilst facilitating the creation of such groups, with the aim of stimulating the cooperative movement.
Njegov namen je tudi spodbujanje in razvoj zadrug, zakon določa oblike združevanja in poenostavlja ustanovitev takih združenj, da bi se tako spodbudilo zadružno gibanje.
Article 93 of the Law is devoted to agricultural cooperatives, and in particular their purpose and the activities that they may engage in.
Njegov člen 93 zadeva kmetijske zadruge, zlasti njihov predmet, in dejavnosti, ki jih lahko opravljajo.
Articles 16(5), 18(2), 33 and 34 of Law No 20/1990 establish rules concerning the taxable amount and the tax arrangements for Spanish cooperatives, including agricultural cooperatives.
Člen 16(5), člen 18(2) ter člena 33 in 34 zakona št. 20/1990 pa določajo normative za davčno osnovo in davčno ureditev za španske zadruge, vključno s kmetijskimi zadrugami.
The Law makes a distinction between ‘protected cooperatives’ and ‘specially protected cooperatives’.
V zakonu se razlikuje med „zaščitenimi zadrugami“ in „posebej zaščitenimi zadrugami“.
‘Protected cooperatives’ are cooperatives which comply with the principles and provisions arising from the general law on cooperatives or the laws of Autonomous Communities.
„Zaščitene zadruge“ spoštujejo načela in določbe, ki izhajajo iz splošnega zakona o zadrugah ali zakonov avtonomnih skupnosti.
Workers cooperatives, agricultural cooperatives, community land cooperatives, fishing cooperatives and consumer and user cooperatives are ‘specially protected cooperatives’.
„Posebej zaščitene zadruge“ so zadruge za pridruženo delo, kmetijske zadruge, zadruge za skupnostno obdelovanje zemlje, morske zadruge ter potrošniške in uporabniške zadruge.
The Law states that the reason why specially protected cooperatives are afforded the highest level of protection is due to the nature of the sectors concerned, the economic capacity of their members and their closer alignment with the principle of mutuality.
V skladu z zakonom so deležne največje zaščite zaradi narave zadevnih sektorjev, ekonomske zmogljivosti članov in ker so najbližje načelu vzajemnosti.
For the purposes of establishing the taxable amount for cooperatives, the results of cooperative activities (transactions with members) and the results of extra-cooperative activities (transactions with non-members) are assessed separately and are not taxed in the same manner.
Za določitev davčne osnove zadrug se poslovni rezultati dejavnosti zadruge (posli s člani) obravnavajo ločeno od poslovnih rezultatov dejavnosti zunaj zadruge (posli z nečlani) in niso enako obdavčeni.
Therefore, cooperatives should keep separate accounts for the two types of activity.
Zato mora zadruga voditi ločeno računovodstvo za ti vrsti poslov.
The tax regime for agricultural cooperatives as ‘specially protected cooperatives’ is identical to that of protected cooperatives, except in the cases mentioned below:
Davčna ureditev, ki se uporablja za kmetijske zadruge, ki so „posebej zaščitene zadruge“, je enaka kot za zaščitene zadruge, razen v naslednjih primerih:
Company tax the purpose of this tax is to raise a charge on profits made by companies and other legal entities.
davek od dobička pravnih oseb ta davek bremeni dobiček družb in drugih pravnih oseb.
The taxable amount for cooperative results (transactions with members) attracts a reduced rate of 20 %, while the taxable amount for extra-cooperative results (transactions with non-members or third parties) is subject to the general rate of 35 % (Article 33(2)).
Davčna osnova, ki ustreza poslovnim rezultatom zadruge (posli s člani), je obdavčena po znižani, 20-odstotni stopnji, medtem ko je davčna osnova, ki ustreza poslovnim rezultatom zunaj zadruge (posli z nečlani ali tretjimi osebami), obdavčena po splošni 35-odstotni davčni stopnji (člen 33(2)).
Moreover, there is a 50 % rebate on financing the mandatory reserve (Article 16(5)) [13] and a 100 % deduction on allocations to the apprenticeship and training reserve (Article 18(2)) [14].
Poleg tega se odbije 50 % sredstev, dodeljenih v obvezni rezervni sklad, (člen 16(5)) [13], in 100 % sredstev, namenjenih skladu za izobraževanje in promocijo (člen 18(2)) [14].
With regard solely to specially protected cooperatives, they are also entitled to a 50 % rebate on their tax bill, defined as the algebraic sum of the amounts resulting from applying the corresponding tax rates to the cooperative and extra-cooperative taxable amounts, whether positive or negative, that sum being the amount payable when positive (Article 34(2)).
Samo posebej zaščitenim zadrugam pa se prizna olajšava v višini 50 % zneska davka, ki je enak algebraični vsoti zneskov, dobljenih z uporabo predvidenih davčnih stopenj za zadružne in zunajzadružne pozitivne ali negativne davčne osnove, kadar je poslovni rezultat pozitiven (člen 34.2).
Finally, they are also free to decide on the depreciation of their new physical assets acquired during the three years following the date of their registration in the Register of Cooperatives.
Nazadnje imajo tudi možnost amortizacije novega osnovnega sredstva, pridobljenega v prvih treh letih po vpisu v register zadrug,