natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Japanese authorities monitor the presence of radioactivity in feed and food and it can be observed from the reported analytical results that certain feed and food in prefectures close to the Fukushima nuclear power station continue to contain levels of radioactivity above the maximum levels.
Japonski organi nadzorujejo prisotnost radioaktivnosti v krmi in živilih, na podlagi poročil o analizi rezultatov pa se lahko vidi, da določena krma in živila v prefekturah v bližini jedrske centrale Fukušima še naprej vsebujejo ravni radioaktivnosti nad mejnimi vrednostmi.
It is therefore appropriate to extend the date of applicability of the measures by three additional months.
Zato je primerno podaljšati datum uporabe ukrepov za tri dodatne mesece.
A significant number of samples taken by the Japanese authorities from feed and food produced in the Nagano prefecture show that the production of feed and food in that prefecture is only to a very limited extent affected by the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station as only one sample of mushrooms of more than 1800 samples of feed and food from Nagano had non-compliant levels of radioactivity.
Rezultati visokega števila vzorcev, ki so jih japonski organi odvzeli s krme in živil, proizvedenih v prefekturi Nagano, so pokazali, da je proizvodnja krme in živil v navedeni prefekturi le v zelo omejenem obsegu prizadeta zaradi nesreče v jedrski elektrarni Fukušima, saj je le en vzorec gob od več kot 1800 vzorcev krme in živil iz Nagana presegel ravni radioaktivnosti.
In particular, nearly all samples had non-detectable levels of radioactivity and only in few samples significant levels of radioactivity were detected.
Tako v skoraj vseh vzorcih ni bilo mogoče zaznati radioaktivnosti in le v nekaj vzorcih je bila odkrita znatna raven radioaktivnosti.
Therefore, it is appropriate to remove that prefecture from the zone, where a testing of all feed and food originating from those prefectures is required before export to the Union.
Zato je primerno navedeno prefekturo črtati s seznama prefektur, za katere se zahteva preskušanje vse krme in živil s poreklom iz navedenih prefektur pred izvozom v EU.
The analytical results of import controls performed by the competent authorities of the Member States are so far very favourable and indicate that the control measures imposed on feed and food for export to the EU are correctly and efficiently applied by the Japanese authorities.
Rezultati analize uvoznih kontrol, ki so jih izvedli pristojni organi držav članic, so bili do zdaj zelo ugodni in kažejo, da japonski organi ustrezno in učinkovito izvajajo nadzorne ukrepe za krmo in živila za izvoz v EU.
Therefore, it is appropriate to consider at the next review of the measures a reduction of the frequency of import controls.
Zato je primerno pri naslednjem pregledu ukrepov zmanjšati pogostnost uvoznih kontrol.
Given that the half-life of iodine-131 is short (about 8 days) and that no new releases of iodine-131 to the environment have been recently reported, the presence of iodine-131 is no longer observed in feed and food or the environment.
Ker je razpolovna doba joda-131 kratka (okrog 8 dni) in ker se v zadnjem času ni poročalo o novih sprostitvah joda-131 v okolje, prisotnost joda-131 ni bila več ugotovljena v krmi in živilih ali okolju.
As the possibility of new releases of iodine-131 are very minimal, it is appropriate to no longer require the analysis for the presence of iodine-131.
Ker je možnost novih sprostitev joda-131 zelo majhna, je ustrezno, da se analiza za prisotnost joda-131 več ne zahteva.
To facilitate the issuance of attestations, it is appropriate to authorise the competent authority to appoint an instance which is authorised to sign in certain cases the attestations under the authority and supervision of the competent authority of Japan.
Za olajšanje izdajanja potrdil je primerno pristojni organ pooblastiti, da imenuje službo, ki je v določenih primerih pooblaščena za podpisovanje potrdil pod vodstvom in nadzorom japonskega pristojnega organa.
It is therefore appropriate to amend Implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2011 accordingly.
Zato je primerno ustrezno spremeniti Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 961/2011.
Regulation (EU) No 961/2011 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EU) št. 961/2011 se spremeni:
in Article 2, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
Člen 2(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
the product has been harvested and/or processed before 11 March 2011; or
so bili proizvodi spravljeni in/ali predelani pred 11. marcem 2011, ali
the product originates in and is consigned from a prefecture other than Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa and Shizuoka; or
proizvodi izvirajo in so poslani iz prefekture, ki ni prefektura Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava in Šizuoka, ali
the product is consigned from Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa and Shizuoka prefectures, but does not originate in one of those prefectures and has not been exposed to radioactivity during transiting; or
so proizvodi poslani iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava in Šizuoka, vendar ne izvirajo iz katere od navedenih prefektur in med tranzitom niso bili izpostavljeni radioaktivnosti, ali
where a product originates in Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa and Shizuoka prefectures, the product does not contain levels of radionuclides caesium-134 and caesium-137 above the maximum levels provided for in Annex II to this Regulation.’;
pri proizvodih, ki izvirajo iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava in Šizuoka, vrednost radionuklidov cezij-134 in cezij-137 ne presega mejnih vrednosti iz Priloge II k tej uredbi.“
in Article 2, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:
Člen 2(5) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The declaration referred to in paragraph 3 shall be drawn up in accordance with the model set out in Annex I. For the products referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of paragraph 3, the declaration shall be signed by an authorised representative of the competent authority of Japan or by an authorised representative of an instance authorised by the competent authority of Japan under the authority and supervision of the competent authority.
Izjava iz odstavka 3 se sestavi v skladu z vzorcem iz Priloge I. Izjavo za proizvode iz točk (a), (b) ali (c) odstavka 3 podpiše pooblaščeni predstavnik japonskega pristojnega organa ali pristojni predstavnik službe, ki jo je pooblastil ter jo vodi in nadzira japonski pristojni organ.
For the products referred to in point (d) of paragraph 3, the declaration shall be signed by an authorised representative of the competent authority of Japan and shall be accompanied by an analytical report containing the results of sampling and analysis.’;
Pri proizvodih iz točke (d) odstavka 3 izjavo podpiše pooblaščeni predstavnik japonskih pristojnih organov, priloži pa se ji poročilo o analizi, ki vsebuje rezultate vzorčenja in analize.“
in Article 5, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Člen 5(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
documentary checks on all consignments of products referred to in Article 1; and
preverijo dokumentacijo pri vseh pošiljkah proizvodov iz člena 1 ter
identity and physical checks, including laboratory analysis on the presence of caesium-134 and caesium-137, on at least:
preverijo identiteto in fizično pregledajo, vključno z izvedbo laboratorijskih analiz za prisotnost cezija-134 in cezija-137, najmanj:
10 % of the consignments of products referred to in Article 2(3)(d), and
10 % pošiljk proizvodov iz člena 2(3)(d) in
20 % of the consignments of products referred to in Article 2(3)(b) and (c).’;
20 % pošiljk proizvodov iz člena 2(3)(b) in (c).“
in Article 10, the second paragraph, the date of ‘31 December 2011’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2012’.
V drugem odstavku člena 10 se datum „31. decembra 2011“ nadomesti z „31. marca 2012“.
OJ L 252, 28.9.2011, p. 10.
UL L 252, 28.9.2011, str. 10.
Batch identification code …
Identifikacijska koda serije …
Declaration number …
Številka izjave …
is originating in and consigned from a prefecture other than Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa and Shizuoka.
izvirajo in so poslani iz prefekture, ki ni prefektura Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava in Šizuoka.
is consigned from the prefectures Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa and Shizuoka, but not originating in one of these prefectures and has not been exposed to radioactivity during transiting.
so poslani iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava in Šizuoka, vendar ne izvirajo iz katere od navedenih prefektur in niso bili izpostavljeni radioaktivnosti med tranzitom.
is originating in the prefectures Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Miyagi, Yamanashi, Saitama, Tokyo, Chiba, Kanagawa and Shizuoka and has been sampled on … (date), subjected to laboratory analysis on …
izvirajo iz prefektur Fukušima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Točigi, Mijagi, Jamanaši, Saitama, Tokio, Čiba, Kanagava in Šizuoka, vzorci pa so bili odvzeti … (datum), in opravljeno laboratorijsko analizo …
(name of laboratory), to determine the level of the radionuclides, caesium-134 and caesium-137, and the analytical results are in compliance with the maximum levels referred to in Article 2(3).
(ime laboratorija) za določitev vrednosti radionuklidov, cezija-134 in cezija-137, rezultati analize pa so v skladu z mejnimi vrednostmi iz člena 2(3).
Stamp and signature of authorised representative referred to in Article 2(5)
Žig in podpis pooblaščeni predstavnik iz člena 2(5)
Part to be completed by the competent authority at the BIP or DPE
Ta del izpolni pristojni organ na MKT ali DVT:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1372/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1372/2011
concerning the non-approval of the active substance acetochlor, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Decision 2008/934/EC
o neodobritvi aktivne snovi acetoklor v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in o spremembi Direktive Komisije 2008/934/ES
In accordance with Article 80(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC [2] is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which completeness has been established in accordance with Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [3].
V skladu s členom 80(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 ter ob upoštevanju postopka in pogojev za odobritev je treba Direktivo Sveta 91/414/EGS [2] uporabljati za aktivne snovi, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da je dokumentacija popolna v skladu s členom 16 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [3].
Acetochlor is an active substance for which completeness has been established in accordance with that Regulation.
Acetoklor je aktivna snov, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je dokumentacija popolna v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
One of these lists included acetochlor.
Eden od teh seznamov je vključeval acetoklor.
In accordance with Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007 of 20 September 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the third stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC [6] the notifier withdrew its support for the inclusion of that active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC within two months from entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007.
V skladu s členom 3(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1095/2007 z dne 20. septembra 2007 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002 o nadaljnjih podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje tretje faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS ter Uredbe (ES) št. 2229/2004 o določitvi nadaljnjih podrobnih pravil za izvajanje četrte faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS [6] je prijavitelj v dveh mesecih po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1095/2007 umaknil predlog za vključitev aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/934/EC of 5 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances [7] was adopted on the non-inclusion of acetochlor.
Zato je bila za nevključitev acetoklora sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/934/ES z dne 5. decembra 2008 o nevključitvi nekaterih aktivnih snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo te snovi [7].
The application was submitted to Spain which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002.
Zahtevek je bil vložen pri Španiji, ki je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 1490/2002 imenovana za državo članico poročevalko.
It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 22 April 2010.
Navedeno poročilo je 22. aprila 2010 predložila Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in Komisiji.
In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on the risk assessment of acetochlor to the Commission on 18 April 2011 [8].
V skladu s členom 20(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in na zahtevo Komisije je Agencija 18. aprila 2011 [8] Komisiji predložila svoj sklep o oceni tveganja acetoklora.
The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 11 October 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for acetochlor.
Države članice in Komisija so osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatno poročilo in sklep Agencije pregledale v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 11. oktobra 2011 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu acetoklora.
During the evaluation of this active substance, concerns were identified.
Med ocenjevanjem navedene aktivne snovi so se pojavili pomisleki.
A potential human exposure above the acceptable daily intake has been identified.
Ugotovljena je bila morebitna višja izpostavljenost ljudi od sprejemljivega dnevnega vnosa.
In addition, there is a potential for human exposure to the surface water metabolite t-norchloro acetochlor, the genotoxicity of which cannot be excluded.
Poleg tega obstaja možnost izpostavljenosti ljudi metabolitu v površinskih vodah t-norkloroacetokloru, katerega genotoksičnosti ni mogoče izključiti.
There is a high risk of groundwater contamination for several metabolites, a high risk for aquatic organisms and a high long term risk for herbivorous birds.
Obstaja visoko tveganje onesnaženja podtalnice z več metaboliti, visoko tveganje za vodne organizme in visoko dolgoročno tveganje za rastlinojede ptice.
Finally, the information available was not sufficient to conclude on the risk assessment for the groundwater contamination for metabolites t-norchloracetochlor and t-hydroxyacetochlor.
Poleg tega razpoložljivi podatki niso zadostovali, da bi se sprejela ocena tveganja za onesnaženje podtalnice z metabolitoma t-norkloroacetoklor in t-hidroksiacetoklor.
Consequently, it has not been demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing acetochlor satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato ni bilo dokazano, da bi bilo pod predlaganimi pogoji uporabe pričakovati, da fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo acetoklor, izpolnjujejo splošne zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Acetochlor should therefore not be approved pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Acetoklor se zato ne sme odobriti kot aktivna snov na podlagi člena 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
To provide Member States with time to withdraw authorisations for plant protection products containing acetochlor, Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 should be derogated from.
Da bi države članice imele dovolj časa, da prekličejo registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo acetoklor, je treba določiti odstopanje od Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002.
For plant protection products containing acetochlor, where Member States grant any period of grace in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, this period should expire at the latest one year after the withdrawal of the respective authorisation.
Za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo acetoklor in pri katerih države članice odobrijo prehodno obdobje v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, mora to obdobje poteči najpozneje eno leto po preklicu ustrezne registracije.
This Regulation does not prejudice the submission of a further application for acetochlor pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na predložitev ponovnega zahtevka za acetoklor v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
In the interest of clarity, the entry for acetochlor in the Annex to Decision 2008/934/EC should be deleted.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba v Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/934/ES črtati vrstico o acetokloru.
The Standing Committee on the Food chain and Animal Health did not deliver an opinion.
Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ni podal svojega mnenja.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the appeal committee,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora za pritožbe –
The active substance acetochlor is not approved.
Aktivna snov acetoklor se ne odobri.
By way of derogation from Article 12(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002, Member States shall ensure that authorisations for plant protection products containing acetochlor are withdrawn by 23 June 2012.
Z odstopanjem od člena 12(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002 države članice zagotovijo, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo acetoklor, prekličejo do 23. junija 2012.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 shall be as short as possible and shall expire 12 months after withdrawal of the respective authorisation at the latest.
Morebitno prehodno obdobje, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, je čim krajše in traja največ do 12 mesecev po preklicu ustrezne registracije.
In the Annex to Decision 2008/934/EC, the entry for ‘acetochlor’ is deleted.
V Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/934/ES se črta vrstica o acetokloru.
European Food Safety Authority: ‘Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance acetochlor’.
[8] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo acetoklor.
[109 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2143.
[109 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2143.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1373/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1373/2011
excluding ICES Subdivisions 27 and 28.2 from certain fishing effort limitations for 2012, pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 establishing a multiannual plan for the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks
o izključitvi podrazdelkov ICES 27 in 28.2 iz nekaterih omejitev ribolovnega napora za leto 2012 v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1098/2007 o vzpostavitvi večletnega načrta za staleže trske v Baltskem morju in ribištvo, ki izkorišča te staleže
On the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007, Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1256/2011 of 30 November 2011 fixing for 2012 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea and amending Regulation (EU) No 1124/2010 [2] has established fishing effort limitations for 2012 in the Baltic Sea.
Omejitve ribolovnega napora v Baltskem morju za leto 2012 so bile določene na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1098/2007 in Priloge II k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1256/2011 z dne 30. novembra 2011 o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib v Baltskem morju ter Uredbe (EU) št. 1124/2010 [2], ki spreminja navedeno uredbo.
Taking into account the reports submitted by Member States and the advice from the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, subdivisions 27 and 28.2 should be excluded in 2012 from the scope of those fishing effort limitations.
Ob upoštevanju poročil, ki so jih predložile države članice, in mnenja Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo je treba podrazdelka 27 in 28.2 v letu 2012 izključiti iz navedenih omejitev ribolovnega napora.
The provisions of Article 8(1)(b), (3), (4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 shall not apply to ICES subdivisions 27 and 28.2 in the year 2012.
Določbe člena 8(1)(b), (3), (4) in (5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1098/2007 se v letu 2012 ne uporabljajo za podrazdelka ICES 27 in 28.2.
OJ L 320, 3.12.2011, p. 3.
UL L 320, 3.12.2011, str. 3.
Regulation (EU) No 1256/2011 will apply from 1 January 2012.
Uredba (EU) št. 1256/2011 se bo uporabljala od 1. januarja 2012.
In order to ensure coherence with that Regulation, this Regulation should also apply from 1 January 2012.
Da se zagotovi skladnost z navedeno uredbo, je to uredbo treba uporabljati od 1. januarja 2012.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1374/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1374/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 December 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 22. decembra 2011.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1375/2011
Izvedbena uredba sveta (EU) št. 1375/2011
implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 687/2011
o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu in razveljavitvi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 687/2011
On 18 July 2011, the Council adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) No 687/2011 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 [2], establishing an updated list of persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies.
Svet je 18. julija 2011 sprejel Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 687/2011 o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 [2], v kateri je posodobljen seznam oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere se uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 2580/2001.
The Council has provided all the persons, groups and entities for which it was practically possible with statements of reasons explaining why they were listed in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 687/2011.
Svet je vsem osebam, skupinam in subjektom, za katere je bilo to praktično izvedljivo, utemeljil razloge, zakaj so bile uvrščene na seznam iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 687/2011.