natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP of 14 June 2010 on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ [1], and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2010/330/SZVP z dne 14. junija 2010 o integrirani misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države v Iraku, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ [1], in zlasti člena 9 Sklepa,
Pursuant to Decision 2010/330/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (hereinafter referred to as ‘EUJUST LEX-IRAQ’), including in particular, the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.
Politični in varnostni odbor je na podlagi Sklepa 2010/330/SZVP pooblaščen, da v skladu s členom 38 Pogodbe sprejme ustrezne odločitve z namenom izvajanja političnega nadzora in strateškega vodenja integrirane misije Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države v Iraku, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EUJUST LEX-IRAQ), vključno z odločitvijo o imenovanju vodje misije.
The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of the current Deputy Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, Mr Carl TORNELL as Head of Mission from 1 July 2011 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission,
Visoki predstavnik Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko je predlagal imenovanje sedanjega namestnika vodje misije EUJUST LEX-IRAQ Carla TORNELLA za vodjo misije od 1. julija 2011 do imenovanja novega vodje misije –
Mr Carl TORNELL is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ as from 1 July 2011 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission.
Carl TORNELL se imenuje za vodjo misije EUJUST LEX-IRAQ od 1. julija 2011 do imenovanja novega vodje misije.
Done at Brussels, 21 June 2011.
V Bruslju, 21. junija 2011
amending Decision 2008/855/EC as regards animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in Hungary and Slovakia
o spremembi Odločbe 2008/855/ES glede nadzornih ukrepov za zdravje živali v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo na Madžarskem in Slovaškem
Hungary has informed the Commission about the recent developments with regard to that disease in feral pigs in the territory of the county of Heves and in certain areas of the territory of the county of Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén.
Madžarska je Komisijo obvestila o zadnjih dogajanjih v zvezi z navedeno boleznijo pri divjih prašičih v okrajih Heves in v določenih predelih okraja Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén.
That information indicates that classical swine fever in feral pigs has been eradicated in the territory of those counties.
Navedene informacije kažejo, da je bila klasična prašičja kuga pri divjih prašičih v navedenih okrožjih izkoreninjena.
Slovakia has informed the Commission about the recent developments with regard to that disease in domestic and feral pigs in the territories listed for that Member State in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC.
Slovaška je Komisijo obvestila o zadnjih dogajanjih v zvezi z boleznijo pri domačih in divjih prašičih na območjih, navedenih za to državo članico v Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/855/ES.
That information indicates that classical swine fever in domestic and feral pigs has been eradicated in those territories.
Navedene informacije kažejo, da je bila klasična prašičja kuga pri domačih in divjih prašičih v navedenih območjih izkoreninjena.
Accordingly, those areas where the situation improved should be removed from the list in the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC and the measures provided for in that Decision should no longer apply to the whole territory of Slovakia.
Zato je treba območja, na katerih so se razmere izboljšale, črtati s seznama v Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/855/ES, ukrepi iz navedene odločbe pa se ne smejo več uporabljati za celotno ozemlje Slovaške.
The Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2008/855/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
Done at Brussels, 20 June 2011.
V Bruslju, 20. junija 2011
Part I of the Annex to Decision 2008/855/EC is amended as follows:
Del I Priloge k Odločbi 2008/855/ES se spremeni:
The territory of the county of Nógrád and the territory of the county of Pest located north and east of the Danube, south of the border with Slovakia, west of the border with the county of Nógrád and north of the motorway E71.’;
Ozemlje okraja Nógrád in ozemlje okraja Pest, ki leži severno in vzhodno od Donave, južno od meje s Slovaško, zahodno od okraja Nógrád ter severno od avtoceste E 71.“
point 4 is deleted.
odstavek 4 se črta.
on extension of the joint-undertaking status of Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk GmbH (HKG)
o podaljšanju statusa skupnega podjetja za podjetje Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk GmbH (HKG)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 49 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, zlasti člena 49 Pogodbe,
By Decision 74/295/Euratom [1], the Council established Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk GmbH (HKG) as a joint undertaking for a period of 25 years as from 1 January 1974.
Svet je z Odločbo 74/295/Euratom [1] ustanovil podjetje Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk GmbH (HKG) kot skupno podjetje za obdobje 25 let od 1. januarja 1974.
The objectives of HKG were to construct, equip and operate a nuclear power station with a capacity of approximately 300 MWe at Uentrop (Unna district) in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Cilji HKG so bili izgradnja, oprema in začetek obratovanja jedrske elektrarne z zmogljivostjo približno 300 MWe v kraju Uentrop (okrožje Unna) v Zvezni republiki Nemčiji.
After being in operation from 1987 to 1988, the nuclear power station was finally shut down on 1 September 1989 as a result of technical and economic difficulties.
Jedrska elektrarna je obratovala od leta 1987 do 1988, zatem pa je bila končno zaustavljena 1. septembra 1989 zaradi tehničnih in gospodarskih težav.
Since 1 September 1989 the objective of HKG has been to implement a programme for decommissioning the nuclear power station up to the safe enclosure stage and, thereafter, to carry out a programme of surveillance of the enclosed nuclear installations.
Od 1. septembra 1989 naprej je cilj HKG izvesti program za razgradnjo jedrske elektrarne do faze varne ograjenosti in nato izvesti program nadzora ograjenih jedrskih objektov.
In its Decision 92/547/Euratom of 16 November 1992 extending the status of Kernkraftwerk Lingen GmbH as a joint undertaking [2], the Council recognised that there was no equivalent to these programmes in the Community, that implementation thereof was important and that they provided useful experience for the nuclear industry and the future development of nuclear energy in the Community.
Svet je v svoji Odločbi 92/547/Euratom z dne 16. novembra 1992 o podaljšanju statusa skupnega podjetja za podjetje „Kernkraftwerk Lingen GmbH“ [2] ugotovil, da se v Skupnosti še ni izvajal primerljiv program, da je izvedba teh programov pomembna in da bodo zagotovili koristne izkušnje za jedrsko industrijo in prihodnji razvoj jedrske energije v Skupnosti.
In order to achieve its objective, HKG requested the extension of its joint-undertaking status with effect from 1 January 1999.
Da bi podjetje HKG izpolnilo svoj cilj, je zaprosilo za podaljšanje svojega statusa skupnega podjetja z učinkom od 1. januarja 1999.
By Decision 2002/355/Euratom [3], the Council extended the status of HKG as a joint undertaking until 31 December 2009 to enable HKG to complete its decommissioning and surveillance programmes, in particular by lightening the financial burden.
Svet je z Odločbo 2002/355/Euratom [3] podjetju HKG podaljšal status skupnega podjetja do 31. decembra 2009, da bi mu omogočil zaključitev programov razgradnje in nadzora, zlasti z zmanjšanjem finančnega bremena.
The extension period corresponded to the duration of arrangements concluded between the German Federal Republic, the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia, HKG and its members for financing HKG’s activities.
Obdobje, za katerega je bil status podaljšan, je ustrezalo obdobju veljavnosti dogovorov, ki so jih sprejeli Zvezna republika Nemčija, zvezna dežela Severno Porenje-Vestfalija, HKG in njegovi člani v zvezi s financiranjem dejavnosti HKG.
By letter, dated 26 April 2010, HKG asked for the further extension of the joint-undertaking status for another 25 years in order to achieve its objectives.
Z dopisom z dne 26. aprila 2010 je HKG zaprosilo za dodatno podaljšanje statusa skupnega podjetja, in sicer za nadaljnjih 25 let, da bi doseglo cilje svoje dejavnosti.
Extension of its joint-undertaking status should enable HKG to complete its decommissioning and surveillance programmes, in particular by lightening the financial burden.
Podaljšanje statusa skupnega podjetja bi naj podjetju HKG omogočilo zaključitev programov razgradnje in nadzora, zlasti zahvaljujoč zmanjšanju finančnega bremena.
The arrangements concluded between the German Federal Republic, the Land of North Rhine-Westphalia, HKG and its members for financing HKG’s activities apply only for a period up to 31 December 2017.
Dogovori, ki so jih sprejeli Zvezna republika Nemčija, zvezna dežela Severno Porenje-Vestfalija, HKG in njegovi člani v zvezi s financiranjem dejavnosti HKG, veljajo le za obdobje do 31. decembra 2017.
HKG’s joint-undertaking status should therefore be extended for the same period,
Zaradi tega je treba podjetju HKG podaljšati status skupnega podjetja za isto obdobje –
The joint-undertaking status, within the meaning of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, granted to Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk GmbH (HKG) is hereby extended for eight years with effect from 1 January 2010.
Status skupnega podjetja v smislu Pogodbe o ustanovitivi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, ki je bil podeljen podjetju Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk GmbH (HKG), se podaljša za osem let z učinkom od 1. januarja 2010.
The objective of HKG shall be to implement a programme for decommissioning the nuclear power station located at Uentrop (Unna district) in the Federal Republic of Germany, up to the safe enclosure stage and, thereafter, to carry out a programme of surveillance of the enclosed nuclear installations.
Cilj podjetja HKG je izvesti program za razgradnjo jedrske elektrarne v kraju Uentrop (okrožje Unna) v Zvezni republiki Nemčiji do faze varne ograjenosti in nato izvesti program nadzora ograjenih jedrskih objektov.
This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to HKG.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice in HKG.
Done at Luxembourg, 17 June 2011.
V Luxembourgu, 17. junija 2011
OJ L 165, 20.6.1974, p. 7.
UL L 165, 20.6.1974, str. 7.
OJ L 352, 2.12.1992, p. 9.
UL L 352, 2.12.1992, str. 9.
OJ L 123, 9.5.2002, p. 53.
UL L 123, 9.5.2002, str. 53.
authorising Romania to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
o dovoljenju Romuniji, da uporabi posebni ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost
By letters registered at the Commission on 4 November 2009, 2 July 2010, 26 July 2010 and 20 December 2010, Romania requested authorisation, for a period of 2 years, to designate as liable to value added tax (VAT) the taxable persons to whom supplies of certain cereals and oilseeds are made, by way of derogation from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC.
Romunija je v dopisih, ki jih je Komisija evidentirala 4. novembra 2009, 2. julija 2010, 26. julija 2010 in 20. decembra 2010, prosila za dovoljenje za dobo dveh let, da lahko z odstopanjem od člena 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES določi, da je davčni zavezanec, ki so mu dobavljena nekatera žita in semena oljnic, zavezanec za davek na dodano vrednost (DDV).
It has said that it will not seek renewal of this authorisation.
Navedla je, da ne bo prosila za podaljšanje tega dovoljenja.
The Commission forwarded Romania’s request to the other Member States by letter of 15 March 2011.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 15. marca 2011 zahteve Romunije posredovala drugim državam članicam.
By letter of 22 March 2011, the Commission notified Romania that it had all the information it considered necessary for appraisal of the requests.
V dopisu z dne 22. marca 2011 je Komisija obvestila Romunijo, da ima vse informacije, za katere meni, da so potrebne za presojo zahteve.
Romania has found cases of tax evasion in the trade in certain unprocessed agricultural products, cereals and oilseeds.
Romunija je odkrila primere davčne utaje v trgovanju z nekaterimi nepredelanimi kmetijskimi pridelki, žiti in semeni oljnic.
Some operators do not pay VAT to the Treasury after delivering their products, especially if they have acquired them without payment of input tax.
Nekateri subjekti v državno blagajno ne plačajo DDV potem ko dobavijo svoje izdelke, zlasti kadar so jih pridobili brez plačila vstopnega davka.
Their customers, however, are entitled to deduct the VAT as they are in possession of a valid invoice.
Kljub temu pa imajo njihovi kupci z veljavnim računom pravico do odbitka DDV.
Designating the taxable person to whom the goods are supplied as liable for the VAT instead of the supplier would be a temporary emergency measure that would put an end to this form of evasion.
Določitev davčnega zavezanca, kateremu je blago dobavljeno, kot zavezanca za DDV namesto dobavitelja, bi bil začasni nujni ukrep, s katerim bi bila odpravljena ta oblika utaje.
Application of that special measure for 2 years should give Romania time to introduce in the agricultural sector definitive measures compatible with Directive 2006/112/EC that would prevent and combat this form of evasion.
Dve leti uporabe tega posebnega ukrepa bi morali Romuniji zagotoviti čas za uvedbo dokončnih ukrepov v kmetijskem sektorju, skladnih z Direktivo 2006/112/ES, za preprečevanje te oblike utaje in boj proti njej.
To prevent the fraudulent activity being transferred to the processing stage of food or industrial goods, or to other products, Romania should introduce at the same time appropriate declaration and control measures and notify the Commission thereof.
Da bi preprečila prenos goljufive dejavnosti v fazo predelave živilskega ali industrijskega blaga ali v druge izdelke, bi morala Romunija sočasno uvesti ustrezno deklaracijo in nadzorne ukrepe ter o tem obvestiti Komisijo.
To ensure that the special measure applies only to unprocessed agricultural products and that the taxable persons concerned do not incur disproportionate administrative costs or run any risk as to legal certainty, the goods covered by the special measure should be determined by using the combined nomenclature laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff [2].
Da se zagotovi, da se posebni ukrep uporablja samo za nepredelane kmetijske pridelke in da zadevni davčni zavezanci ne nosijo nesorazmernih upravnih stroškov ali ogrozijo pravne varnosti, bi bilo treba za določitev blaga, na katerega se nanaša ta posebni ukrep, uporabiti kombinirano nomenklaturo, določeno z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 z dne 23. julija 1987 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi [2].
The special measure is justified and proportionate to the objectives pursued.
Posebni ukrep je upravičen in sorazmeren z zastavljenimi cilji.
It is of fixed duration and concerns only a number of clearly designated products that are not normally used in the unaltered state for final consumption and have been the subject of tax evasion activities that have caused a substantial loss of VAT revenue.
Je časovno omejen in se nanaša samo na nekatere natančno določene izdelke, ki v nespremenjenem stanju navadno niso uporabljeni v končni potrošnji in so bili predmet davčnih utaj, ki so povzročile znatno izgubo prihodkov iz DDV.
Given the scale of this lost tax revenue, the measure should be adopted as soon as possible.
Glede na obseg izgube davčnih prihodkov, bi bilo treba ta ukrep čim prej sprejeti.
The special measure will not affect the overall amount of VAT revenue of Romania collected at the stage of final consumption and will have no adverse impact on the Union’s own resources accruing from VAT,
Posebni ukrep ne bo vplival na skupni znesek prihodkov iz DDV Romunije, ki ga pobere v fazi končne potrošnje in ne bo imel škodljivega vpliva na lastna sredstva Unije iz naslova DDV –
By way of derogation from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Romania is hereby authorised to designate as the person liable to pay VAT the taxable recipient of supplies of the following goods, as set out in the combined nomenclature established by Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87:
Z odstopanjem od člena 193 Direktive 2006/112/ES se Romuniji dovoli, da določi kot osebo, ki je dolžna plačati DDV, davčnega prejemnika naslednjega dobavljenega blaga, navedenega v kombinirani nomenklaturi iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 2658/87:
Common wheat, seed
Pšenica navadna, semenska
Other spelt and common wheat, not for sowing
Pira in pšenica navadna, razen semenske
The authorisation provided for in Article 1 is subject to Romania’s introducing declaration obligations and appropriate and effective control measures with respect to taxable persons who supply the goods to which that authorisation applies.
Dovoljenje iz člena 1 je predmet uvedbe obveznosti deklaracije ter ustreznih in učinkovitih nadzornih ukrepov v Romuniji, za davčne zavezance, ki dobavljajo blago, za katero se uporablja to dovoljenje.
Romania shall notify the Commission of the introduction of the obligations and measures referred to in the first paragraph.
Romunija Komisijo uradno obvesti o uvedbi obveznosti in ukrepov iz prvega odstavka.
This Decision shall take effect on the date of its notification.
Ta sklep začne učinkovati na dan uradnega obvestila.
It shall apply from 1 June 2011 until 31 May 2013.
Uporablja se od 1. junija 2011 do 31. maja 2013.
This Decision is addressed to Romania.
Ta sklep ja naslovljen na Romunijo.
on the State aid C 26/09 (ex N 289/09) which Latvia is planning to implement for the restructuring of AS Parex banka
o državni pomoči C 26/09 (ex N 289/09), ki jo namerava izvajati Latvija za prestrukturiranje banke AS Parex
On 10 November 2008 Latvia notified to the Commission a package of measures in favour of AS Parex banka (hereinafter ‘Parex banka’), designed to support the stability of the financial system, which was approved on 24 November 2008 [2] (hereinafter ‘first rescue Decision’) based on Latvia’s commitment to submit a restructuring plan for Parex banka within 6 months.
Latvija je 10. novembra 2008 Komisiji priglasila paket ukrepov v korist banke AS Parex banka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka Parex) za podporo stabilnosti finančnega sistema. Paket ukrepov je bil odobren 24. novembra 2008 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prva odločba o reševanju) z zavezo Latvije, da bo v šestih mesecih predložila načrt prestrukturiranja za banko Parex.
On 26 January 2009, Latvia informed the Commission about several changes to the public support measures to Parex banka.
Latvija je 26. januarja 2009 Komisijo obvestila o več spremembah ukrepov javne podpore za banko Parex.
Those changes were approved on 11 February 2009 [3] (hereinafter ‘second rescue Decision’).
Te spremembe so bile odobrene 11. februarja 2009 [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: druga odločba o reševanju).
On 29 March 2009, Latvia notified to the Commission the need for further changes to the recapitalisation measure.
Latvija je 29. marca 2009 Komisiji priglasila potrebo po nadaljnjih spremembah ukrepa dokapitalizacije.
Those changes were approved by Commission Decision of 11 May 2009 [4] (hereinafter ‘third rescue Decision’).
Te spremembe so bile odobrene z Odločbo Komisije z dne 11. maja 2009 [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: tretja odločba o reševanju).
On 11 May 2009, Latvia notified a restructuring plan for Parex banka.
Latvija je 11. maja 2009 priglasila načrt prestrukturiranja za banko Parex.
On 5 June 2009 a request for information was sent to the Latvian authorities.
Latvijskim organom je bila 5. junija 2009 poslana zahteva za informacije.
On 15 June 2009 a meeting was held between the Latvian authorities and the Commission.
Komisija se je 15. junija 2009 sestala z latvijskimi organi.
Latvia replied partially to that request for information by letter of 7 July 2009.
Latvija je na zahtevo za informacije delno odgovorila z dopisom z dne 7. julija 2009.
By letter of 29 July 2009, the Commission informed Latvia that it had decided to initiate the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU [5] (hereinafter ‘opening Decision’) in respect of the restructuring aid measures.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 29. julija 2009 Latvijo obvestila, da se je v zvezi z ukrepi pomoči za prestrukturiranje odločila začeti postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) PDEU [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločitev o začetku postopka).
The opening Decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union of 6 October 2009 and interested parties were requested to submit their comments on the proposed restructuring aid measures within 1 month from the date of publication.
Odločitev o začetku postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije z dne 6. oktobra 2009, zainteresirane strani pa so bile pozvane, naj v enem mesecu od datuma objave predložijo pripombe glede predlaganih ukrepov pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
The Commission received no comments from interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb zainteresiranih strani.
However, after the expiry of the prescribed period, the Commission received letters dated 15 June and 13 July 2010 from Valerijs Kargins and Viktors Krasovickis, the former majority shareholders of Parex banka (hereinafter ‘former majority shareholders’).
Po izteku predpisanega roka pa je Komisija prejela dopisa z dne 15. junija in 13. julija 2010, ki sta ju poslala Valerijs Kargins in Viktors Krasovickis, nekdanja večinska delničarja banke Parex (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nekdanja večinska delničarja).
Furthermore, the Commission received letters from members of the Latvian parliament dated 22 June and 1 July 2010.
Poleg tega je Komisija prejela dopisa poslancev latvijskega parlamenta z dne 22. junija in 1. julija 2010.
The revised restructuring plan was further updated on 22 September 2009 and additional information was provided.
Spremenjeni načrt prestrukturiranja so dopolnili 22. septembra 2009 in predložili dodatne informacije.
Meetings were held between the Latvian authorities and the Commission on 11 and 17 September 2009.
Komisija se je z latvijskimi organi sestala 11. in 17. septembra 2009.
In addition, Latvia provided further information and clarifications on 11 September, 6 and 26 October, 9 and 23 December 2009, 19 February and 2 March 2010.
Latvija je dodatne informacije in pojasnila predložila še 11. septembra, 6. in 26. oktobra, 9. in 23. decembra 2009, 19. februarja ter 2. marca 2010.
On 12 and 26 October 2009 Latvia provided information regarding a potential change of the restructuring strategy for Parex banka.
Latvija je 12. in 26. oktobra 2009 predložila informacije o morebitni spremembi strategije prestrukturiranja za banko Parex.
On 22 March 2010 a meeting was held between the Commission and the Latvian authorities.
Komisija se je 22. marca 2010 sestala z latvijskimi organi.
By letter of 31 March 2010 Latvia submitted a new version of Parex banka’s restructuring plan dated 31 March 2010, which was later complemented by submissions dated 14 May, 9, 12, 17 and 21 June 2010.
Latvija je z dopisom z dne 31. marca 2010 predložila novo različico načrta prestrukturiranja za banko Parex z dne 31. marca 2010, ki je bil pozneje dopolnjen z dopisi z dne 14. maja ter 9., 12., 17. in 21. junija 2010.
The Commission requested further information on 10 May 2010.
Komisija je 10. maja 2010 zahtevala dodatne informacije.
By letter of 2, 18 and 27 August and 2 September 2010 Latvia provided additional clarifications regarding the commitments to be undertaken.
Latvija je z dopisi z dne 2., 18. in 27. avgusta ter 2. septembra 2010 predložila dodatne informacije o zavezah, ki naj bi jih sprejela.