natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of narrow-track tractors as defined in the second indent of Article 1 of Council Directive 87/402/EEC and tractors of category T4.3 as defined in Annex II, Chapter B, Appendix 1, Part I, of Directive 2003/37/EC the requirements of point 2.3.2.9 shall not apply to the zone situated below a plane inclined at 45° to the rear and transverse to the direction of travel, and passing through a point located 230 mm behind the seat index point (see Figure 7).
Pri ozkokolotečnih traktorjih iz druge alinee člena 1 Direktive Sveta 87/402/EGS in traktorjih kategorije T4.3 iz dela I Dodatka 1 poglavja B Priloge II k Direktivi 2003/37/ES zahteve iz točke 2.3.2.9 ne veljajo za območje pod ravnino, nagnjeno nazaj za 45° in prečno glede na smer vožnje, potekajočo skozi točko, ki leži 230 mm za indeksno točko sedeža (glej sliko 7).
If there are any dangerous points in this zone, corresponding warnings must be affixed to the tractor.
Če so v tem območju nevarna mesta, je treba na traktorju pritrditi ustrezna opozorila.
OJ L 220, 8.8.1987, p. 1.’
UL L 220, 8.8.1987, str. 1.“
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 29 September 2011 at the latest.
Države članice sprejmejo in objavijo, najpozneje do 29. septembra 2011, zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Komisiji takoj sporočijo besedila teh predpisov in korelacijsko tabelo med temi predpisi in to direktivo.
Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2010/63/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes
o zaščiti živali, ki se uporabljajo v znanstvene namene
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske Komisije,
On 24 November 1986 the Council adopted Directive 86/609/EEC [3] in order to eliminate disparities between laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes.
Svet je 24. novembra 1986 sprejel Direktivo 86/609/EGS [3], da bi se odpravile razlike med zakoni in drugimi predpisi držav članic o zaščiti živali, ki se uporabljajo v poskusne in druge znanstvene namene.
Since the adoption of that Directive, further disparities between Member States have emerged.
Od sprejetja navedene direktive so se pojavile nadaljnje razlike med državami članicami.
Certain Member States have adopted national implementing measures that ensure a high level of protection of animals used for scientific purposes, while others only apply the minimum requirements laid down in Directive 86/609/EEC.
Nekatere države članice so sprejele nacionalne izvedbene ukrepe, ki zagotavljajo visoko raven zaščite živali, ki se uporabljajo v znanstvene namene, medtem ko druge uporabljajo samo minimalne zahteve iz Direktive 86/609/EGS.
These disparities are liable to constitute barriers to trade in products and substances the development of which involves experiments on animals.
Te razlike lahko povzročijo trgovinske ovire za izdelke in snovi, za razvoj katerih se izvajajo poskusi na živalih.
Accordingly, this Directive should provide for more detailed rules in order to reduce such disparities by approximating the rules applicable in that area and to ensure a proper functioning of the internal market.
Ta direktiva bi morala zato določiti podrobnejša pravila za zmanjšanje teh razlik s približevanjem predpisov, ki se uporabljajo na tem področju, in zagotoviti pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
Animal welfare is a value of the Union that is enshrined in Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Dobro počutje živali je vrednota Unije, ki je zajeta v členu 13 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
On 23 March 1998 the Council adopted Decision 1999/575/EC concerning the conclusion by the Community of the European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes [4].
Svet je 23. marca 1998 sprejel Sklep 1999/575/ES o sklenitvi, s strani Skupnosti, Evropske konvencije za zaščito vretenčarjev, ki se uporabljajo v poskusne in druge znanstvene namene [4].
By becoming party to that Convention, the Community acknowledged the importance of the protection and welfare of animals used for scientific purposes at international level.
Ko je postala pogodbenica navedene konvencije, je Skupnost na mednarodni ravni priznala pomen zaščite in dobrega počutja živali, ki se uporabljajo v znanstvene namene.
The European Parliament in its resolution of 5 December 2002 on Directive 86/609/EEC called for the Commission to come forward with a proposal for a revision of that Directive with more stringent and transparent measures in the area of animal experimentation.
Evropski parlament je v svoji resoluciji z dne 5. decembra 2002 o Direktivi 86/609/EGS Komisijo pozval, naj pripravi predlog za spremembo navedene direktive s strožjimi in preglednejšimi ukrepi na področju poskusov na živalih.
On 15 June 2006, the Fourth Multilateral Consultation of Parties to the European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes adopted a revised Appendix A to that Convention, which set out guidelines for the accommodation and care of experimental animals.
Dne 15. junija 2006 je bil na četrtem večstranskem posvetovanju držav podpisnic Evropske konvencije za zaščito vretenčarjev, ki se uporabljajo v poskusne in druge znanstvene namene, sprejet revidiran Dodatek A k navedeni konvenciji, v katerem so določene smernice za nastanitev in oskrbo poskusnih živali.
Commission Recommendation 2007/526/EC of 18 June 2007 on guidelines for the accommodation and care of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes [5] incorporated those guidelines.
Te smernice so bile vključene v Priporočilo Komisije 2007/526/ES z dne 18. junija 2007 o smernicah za bivališča in oskrbo živali, ki se uporabljajo za poskusne in druge znanstvene namene [5].
New scientific knowledge is available in respect of factors influencing animal welfare as well as the capacity of animals to sense and express pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm.
Na voljo so nova znanstvena spoznanja glede dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na dobro počutje živali, in sposobnost živali, da občutijo in izražajo bolečino, trpljenje, stisko in trajne poškodbe.
It is therefore necessary to improve the welfare of animals used in scientific procedures by raising the minimum standards for their protection in line with the latest scientific developments.
Zato je treba izboljšati dobro počutje živali, ki se uporabljajo v znanstvenih postopkih, z zvišanjem minimalnih standardov za njihovo zaščito v skladu z najnovejšim razvojem znanosti.
Attitudes towards animals also depend on national perceptions, and there is a demand in certain Member States to maintain more extensive animal-welfare rules than those agreed upon at the level of the Union.
Odnos do živali je odvisen tudi od nacionalnih predstav in v nekaterih državah članicah obstaja potreba po ohranitvi pravil o dobrem počutju živali, ki so obsežnejša od tistih, dogovorjenih na ravni Unije.
In the interests of the animals, and provided it does not affect the functioning of the internal market, it is appropriate to allow the Member States certain flexibility to maintain national rules aimed at more extensive protection of animals in so far as they are compatible with the TFEU.
V interesu živali in če to ne vpliva na delovanje notranjega trga, je primerno, da se državam članicam omogoči določena prožnost pri ohranjanju nacionalnih pravil za obsežnejšo zaščito živali, v kolikor so ta v skladu s PDEU.
In addition to vertebrate animals including cyclostomes, cephalopods should also be included in the scope of this Directive, as there is scientific evidence of their ability to experience pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm.
V področje uporabe te direktive bi bilo poleg vretenčarjev, vključno z obloustkami, treba vključiti tudi glavonožce, saj so na voljo znanstveni dokazi o njihovi sposobnosti občutenja bolečine, trpljenja, stiske in trajnih poškodb.
This Directive should also cover foetal forms of mammals, as there is scientific evidence showing that such forms in the last third of the period of their development are at an increased risk of experiencing pain, suffering and distress, which may also affect negatively their subsequent development.
V tej direktivi bi morale biti zajete tudi fetalne oblike sesalcev, saj obstajajo znanstveni dokazi, da so take oblike v zadnji tretjini obdobja njihovega razvoja izpostavljene povečani nevarnosti občutenja bolečine, trpljenja in stiske, kar lahko tudi negativno vpliva na njihov nadaljnji razvoj.
Scientific evidence also shows that procedures carried out on embryonic and foetal forms at an earlier stage of development could result in pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm, should the developmental forms be allowed to live beyond the first two thirds of their development.
Prav tako znanstveni dokazi kažejo, da bi postopki na embrionalnih in fetalnih oblikah na zgodnejši razvojni stopnji lahko povzročali bolečine, trpljenje, stiske ali trajne poškodbe, če bi te razvojne oblike ohranjali pri življenju po prvih dveh tretjinah njihovega razvoja.
While it is desirable to replace the use of live animals in procedures by other methods not entailing the use of live animals, the use of live animals continues to be necessary to protect human and animal health and the environment.
Čeprav je zaželjeno, da se uporaba živih živali v postopkih nadomesti z drugimi metodami, ki ne vključujejo uporabe živih živali, ostaja uporaba živih živali še naprej potrebna za varstvo zdravja ljudi in živali ter varovanja okolja.
However, this Directive represents an important step towards achieving the final goal of full replacement of procedures on live animals for scientific and educational purposes as soon as it is scientifically possible to do so.
Vendar pa ta direktiva predstavlja pomemben korak k uresničevanju končnega cilja popolne zamenjave postopkov na živih živalih v znanstvene in izobraževalne namene, kakor hitro bo to z znanstvenega vidika mogoče.
To that end, it seeks to facilitate and promote the advancement of alternative approaches.
Za dosego tega cilja si ta direktiva prizadeva omogočiti in spodbujati razvoj alternativnih pristopov.
It also seeks to ensure a high level of protection for animals that still need to be used in procedures.
Ta direktiva tudi poskuša zagotoviti visoko raven zaščite živali, ki jih je še vedno treba uporabljati v postopkih.
This Directive should be reviewed regularly in light of evolving science and animal-protection measures.
To direktivo bi bilo treba redno pregledovati v skladu z razvojem znanosti in ukrepov za zaščito živali.
The care and use of live animals for scientific purposes is governed by internationally established principles of replacement, reduction and refinement.
Za oskrbo in uporabo živih živali v znanstvene namene veljajo mednarodno sprejeta načela zamenjave, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja.
To ensure that the way in which animals are bred, cared for and used in procedures within the Union is in line with that of the other international and national standards applicable outside the Union, the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement should be considered systematically when implementing this Directive.
Za zagotavljanje, da je način reje, oskrbe in uporabe živali v postopkih v Uniji v skladu z načini iz drugih mednarodnih in nacionalnih standardov, ki se uporabljajo zunaj Unije, bi bilo treba pri izvajanju te direktive sistematično upoštevati načela zamenjave, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja.
When choosing methods, the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement should be implemented through a strict hierarchy of the requirement to use alternative methods.
Pri izbiri metod bi bilo treba izvajati načela zamenjave, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja, s strogo hierarhijo zahteve o uporabi alternativnih metod.
Where no alternative method is recognised by the legislation of the Union, the numbers of animals used may be reduced by resorting to other methods and by implementing testing strategies, such as the use of in vitro and other methods that would reduce and refine the use of animals.
Kadar zakonodaja Unije ne priznava nobene alternativne metode, je število živali mogoče zmanjšati z uporabo drugih metod in z izvajanjem strategij preskušanja, kakor je uporaba metod in vitro ter drugih metod, s katerimi bi zmanjšali in izboljšali uporabo živali.
Animals have an intrinsic value which must be respected.
Živali imajo same po sebi vrednost, ki jo je treba spoštovati.
There are also the ethical concerns of the general public as regards the use of animals in procedures.
Obstajajo tudi etični pomisleki splošne javnosti o uporabi živali v postopkih.
Therefore, animals should always be treated as sentient creatures and their use in procedures should be restricted to areas which may ultimately benefit human or animal health, or the environment.
Zato bi bilo treba z živalmi vedno ravnati kot s čutečimi bitji, njihova uporaba v postopkih pa bi morala biti omejena na področja, ki lahko koristijo zdravju ljudi ali živali ali okolju.
The use of animals for scientific or educational purposes should therefore only be considered where a non-animal alternative is unavailable.
Do uporabe živali v znanstvene ali izobraževalne namene bi zato moralo priti le, če ni na voljo nadomestne možnosti, ki ne vključuje živali.
Use of animals for scientific procedures in other areas under the competence of the Union should be prohibited.
Uporabo živali v znanstvenih postopkih na drugih področjih, za katere je pristojna Unija, bi bilo treba prepovedati.
The choice of methods and the species to be used have a direct impact on both the numbers of animals used and their welfare.
Izbira metod in živalskih vrst, ki se jih uporabi, neposredno vpliva na število uporabljenih živali in njihovo dobro počutje.
The choice of methods should therefore ensure the selection of the method that is able to provide the most satisfactory results and is likely to cause the minimum pain, suffering or distress.
Pri izbiri metod bi tako morala biti izbrana tista, s katero se lahko zagotovijo najbolj zadovoljivi rezultati in ki bo po vsej verjetnosti povzročila najmanj bolečin, trpljenja ali stiske.
The methods selected should use the minimum number of animals that would provide reliable results and require the use of species with the lowest capacity to experience pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm that are optimal for extrapolation into target species.
Za izbrane metode bi morali uporabljati najmanjše število živali, s katerim bi zagotovili zanesljive rezultate, in zahtevati uporabo živalskih vrst z najmanjšo sposobnostjo občutenja bolečine, trpljenja, stiske ali trajnih poškodb in ki so optimalne za ekstrapolacijo na ciljne živalske vrste.
The methods selected should avoid, as far as possible, death as an end-point due to the severe suffering experienced during the period before death.
Pri izbranih metodah je treba kolikor je mogoče preprečiti nastop smrti, ki nastopi zaradi hudega trpljenja, občutenega v času pred smrtjo.
Where possible, it should be substituted by more humane end-points using clinical signs that determine the impending death, thereby allowing the animal to be killed without any further suffering.
Kjer je to mogoče, bi bilo treba izbrati bolj humane metode pokončanja glede na klinične znake o neizogibni smrti, pri čimer je dovoljena usmrtitev živali, da se prepreči nadaljnje trpljenje živali.
The use of inappropriate methods for killing an animal can cause significant pain, distress and suffering to the animal.
Uporaba neprimernih metod usmrtitve lahko živali povzroči znatne bolečine, stisko in trpljenje.
The level of competence of the person carrying out this operation is equally important.
Enako pomembna je tudi stopnja usposobljenosti osebe, ki to nalogo opravlja.
Animals should therefore be killed only by a competent person using a method that is appropriate to the species.
Živali bi zato smela usmrtiti samo pristojna oseba z uporabo metode, ki je primerna glede na živalsko vrsto.
It is necessary to ensure that the use of animals in procedures does not pose a threat to biodiversity.
Treba je zagotoviti, da uporaba živali v postopkih ne ogroža biotske raznovrstnosti.
Therefore, the use of endangered species in procedures should be limited to a strict minimum.
Zato bi morala biti uporaba ogroženih živalskih vrst v postopkih omejena na strogi minimum.
Having regard to the present state of scientific knowledge, the use of non-human primates in scientific procedures is still necessary in biomedical research.
Ob upoštevanju trenutnega stanja znanstvenih spoznanj je uporaba primatov razen človeka v znanstvenih postopkih v biomedicinskih raziskavah še vedno potrebna.
Due to their genetic proximity to human beings and to their highly developed social skills, the use of non-human primates in scientific procedures raises specific ethical and practical problems in terms of meeting their behavioural, environmental and social needs in a laboratory environment.
Zaradi njihove genetske podobnosti človeku in njihovega visoko razvitega socialnega vedenja, povzroča uporaba primatov razen človeka v znanstvenih postopkih posebne etične pomisleke in probleme v praksi glede izpolnjevanja njihovih vedenjskih, okoljskih in socialnih potreb v laboratorijskem okolju.
Furthermore, the use of non-human primates is of the greatest concern to the public.
Poleg tega tudi javnost kaže veliko zaskrbljenost v zvezi z uporabo primatov razen človeka.
Therefore the use of non-human primates should be permitted only in those biomedical areas essential for the benefit of human beings, for which no other alternative replacement methods are yet available.
Uporabo primatov razen človeka bi bilo treba dovoliti samo na tistih področjih biomedicine, ki so bistvena za korist človeka, in za katera še ni na voljo nobenih drugih alternativnih metod zamenjave.
Their use should be permitted only for basic research, the preservation of the respective non-human primate species or when the work, including xenotransplantation, is carried out in relation to potentially life-threatening conditions in humans or in relation to cases having a substantial impact on a person’s day-to-day functioning, i.e. debilitating conditions.
Njihova uporaba bi morala biti dovoljena samo za temeljne raziskave, za ohranitev zadevne vrste primatov razen človeka ali kadar se postopki, vključno s ksenotransplantacijo, izvajajo v zvezi s potencialno življenje ogrožajočimi stanji pri človeku ali v povezavi s primeri, ki imajo znaten vpliv na vsakdanjo opravilno sposobnost človeka, zlasti stanji splošne oslabelosti.
The use of great apes, as the closest species to human beings with the most advanced social and behavioural skills, should be permitted only for the purposes of research aimed at the preservation of those species and where action in relation to a life-threatening, debilitating condition endangering human beings is warranted, and no other species or alternative method would suffice in order to achieve the aims of the procedure.
Uporaba velikih opic kot človeku najbližje vrste z najbolj razvitimi socialnimi in vedenjskimi sposobnostmi bi morala biti dovoljena samo za namene raziskav, katerih cilj je ohranitev teh vrst, in kadar je ukrepanje v zvezi z življenje ogrožajočim stanjem in stanjem splošne oslabelosti, ki človeka izpostavlja, upravičeno ter ciljev postopka ne bi bilo mogoče doseči z nobeno drugo živalsko vrsto ali alternativno metodo.
The Member State claiming such a need should provide information necessary for the Commission to take a decision.
Država članica, ki uveljavlja takšno potrebo, bi morala Komisiji predložiti informacije, ki so Komisiji potrebne za sprejetje odločitve.
The capture of non-human primates from the wild is highly stressful for the animals concerned and carries an elevated risk of injury and suffering during capture and transport.
Primati razen človeka med njihovim ulovom v naravnem okolju doživljajo močan stres, kar predstavlja povečano tveganje za poškodbe in trpljenje zadevnih živali med ulovom in prevozom.
In order to end the capturing of animals from the wild for breeding purposes, only animals that are the offspring of an animal which has been bred in captivity, or that are sourced from self-sustaining colonies, should be used in procedures after an appropriate transition period.
Za prenehanje ulova živali v naravnem okolju za namene vzreje bi bilo treba v postopkih po ustreznem prehodnem obdobju uporabljati samo živali, ki so potomci živali, vzgojenih v ujetništvu ali živali iz zaprtih vzrejnih kolonij.
A feasibility study should be carried out to that effect and the transition period adopted if necessary.
V ta namen bi bilo treba opraviti študijo izvedljivosti in po potrebi določiti prehodno obdobje.
The feasibility of moving towards sourcing non-human primates only from self-sustaining colonies as an ultimate goal should also be examined.
Treba bi bilo preučiti tudi izvedljivost pridobivanja primatov razen človeka samo iz zaprtih vzrejnih kolonij, kar je končni cilj.
There is a need for certain species of vertebrate animals used in procedures to be bred specifically for that purpose so that their genetic, biological and behavioural background is well-known to persons undertaking the procedures.
Nekatere vrste vretenčarjev, ki se uporabljajo v postopkih, je treba vzrejati posebej v ta namen, tako da je njihovo genetsko, biološko in vedenjsko ozadje dobro znano osebam, ki izvajajo postopke.
Such knowledge both increases the scientific quality and reliability of the results and decreases the variability, ultimately resulting in fewer procedures and reduced animal use.
S takšnim znanjem se izboljšata znanstvena kakovost in zanesljivost rezultatov, zmanjša pa se spremenljivost, kar v končni fazi privede do zmanjšanja števila postopkov in uporabljenih živali.
Furthermore, for reasons of animal welfare and conservation, the use of animals taken from the wild in procedures should be limited to cases where the purpose of the procedures cannot be achieved using animals bred specifically for use in procedures.
Zaradi dobrega počutja in ohranjanja živali bi poleg tega morala biti uporaba živali iz naravnega okolja v postopkih omejena na primere, v katerih namena postopkov ni mogoče doseči z uporabo živali, vzrejenih posebej za uporabo v postopkih.
Since the background of stray and feral animals of domestic species is not known, and since capture and placement into establishments increases distress for such animals, they should not, as a general rule, be used in procedures.
Ker preteklost domačih vrst potepuških in divjih živali domačih vrst ni znana, ujetje in namestitev v enote pa še poveča stisko takih živali, se jih v postopkih praviloma ne bi smelo uporabljati.
To enhance transparency, facilitate the project authorisation, and provide tools for monitoring compliance, a severity classification of procedures should be introduced on the basis of estimated levels of pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm that is inflicted on the animals.
Za povečanje preglednosti, poenostavitev odobritve projektov in zagotavljanje orodij za spremljanje skladnosti, bi bilo treba razvrstiti postopke po težavnosti na podlagi ocenjene ravni bolečin, trpljenja, stiske in trajnosti poškodb, ki se povzročijo živalim.
From an ethical standpoint, there should be an upper limit of pain, suffering and distress above which animals should not be subjected in scientific procedures.
Z etičnega vidika bi morala obstajati zgornja meja bolečin, trpljenja in stiske, ki v znanstvenih postopkih, v katerih se uporabljajo živali, ne bi smela biti prekoračena.