natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is therefore concluded that Varvaressos was already a firm in difficulty, within the meaning of point 11 of the R&R Guidelines, in 2006, because it had increasing losses and diminishing turnover.
Zato se ugotavlja, da je bila družba Varvaressos že leta 2006 podjetje v težavah v smislu točke 11 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, ker je ustvarjala vedno večje izgube in imela vedno manj prometa.
Despite the fact that the guarantee of 2007 was in fact a rescue aid measure, it was not terminated within 6 months from the date it was granted (30 May 2007), i.e. until 30 November 2007.
Čeprav je bilo poroštvo iz leta 2007 dejansko ukrep pomoči za reševanje, ni bilo prekinjeno v šestih mesecih od datuma odobritve (30. maja 2007), tj. do 30 novembra 2007.
This would in principle constitute misuse of (illegal) aid and an infringement of the ‘one time last time’ principle.
To bi načeloma pomenilo zlorabo (nezakonite) pomoči in kršitev načela enkratnosti pomoči.
Also, the largest part of the loan that was covered by the 2008 guarantee (EUR 1,8 million out of a total of EUR 2,4 million) was aimed at financing the same investments as the restructuring grant of 2009.
Prav tako je bil največji del posojila, zavarovanega s poroštvom iz leta 2008 (1,8 milijona EUR od skupno 2,4 milijona EUR), namenjen financiranju istih naložb kot nepovratna sredstva za prestrukturiranje iz leta 2009.
At the same time, those investments were to be carried out over the same period of time as the restructuring plan of 2009 (see recital 19 above).
Hkrati naj bi se navedene naložbe izvedle v istem obdobju kot načrt za prestrukturiranje iz leta 2009 (glej uvodno izjavo 19 zgoraj).
Finally, the restructuring indeed started in 2006.
Nazadnje, prestrukturiranje se je dejansko začelo leta 2006.
In particular, the plan included four restructuring measures applied or starting to be applied before the granting of the 2007 guarantee (May 2007), i.e. the reduction in production (2006), the reduction in the workforce (2006), the sale of the subsidiary Thiva (January 2007) and the reorganisation and modernisation of the company’s management (2006).
Načrt je zlasti vključeval štiri ukrepe za prestrukturiranje, ki so se izvedli ali se začeli izvajati pred odobritvijo poroštva iz leta 2007 (maja 2007), in sicer zmanjšanje proizvodnje (2006), zmanjšanje delovne sile (2006), prodajo podružnice Thiva (januar 2007) ter reorganizacijo in posodobitev vodenja družbe (2006).
However, it could be argued that the appropriate year to be used as the point of reference for the 10 % withdrawal from the Greek market should be 2006 rather than 2009.
Kljub temu je mogoče trditi, da bi bilo ustrezneje, da je referenčna točka za 10-odstotno zmanjšanje prodaje na grškem trgu leto 2006 in ne leto 2009.
That is because, according to point 40 of the R&R Guidelines, ‘The reduction must be an integral part of the restructuring as laid down in the restructuring plan’.
V skladu s točko 40 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje je razlog za to, da mora biti „[z]manjševanje […] sestavni del prestrukturiranja, kot je opredeljeno v načrtu za prestrukturiranje“.
Indeed, the company’s restructuring started in 2006 and was to take 5 years (until 2011).
Prestrukturiranje družbe se je dejansko začelo leta 2006 in naj bi trajalo pet let (do leta 2011).
Therefore, according to this line of thinking, the compensatory measure should have an impact that would take into account and correspond to the whole duration of the restructuring and not only to a part of it.
Zato morajo v skladu s takšnim razmišljanjem izravnalni ukrepi imeti vpliv, pri katerem bi bilo zajeto celotno trajanje prestrukturiranja in ne le en del, in temu vplivu tudi ustrezati.
In its comments, Greece acknowledged having granted the State guarantee of May 2007.
Grčija je v svojih pripombah priznala, da je odobrila državno poroštvo iz maja 2007.
However, Greece argued that the 2007 guarantee did not constitute State aid (see recital 34 above).
Vendar je trdila, da poroštvo iz leta 2007 ni pomenilo državne pomoči (glej uvodno izjavo 34 zgoraj).
Starting in the year 2011, Varvaressos’s yearly turnover from sales in Greece must be reduced by 10 % compared with the turnover in sales in Greece in 2009.
Z letom 2011 je treba letni promet podjetja Varvaressos, ustvarjen s prodajo v Grčiji, zmanjšati za 10 % v primerjavi s prometom, ustvarjenim s prodajo v Grčiji leta 2009.
This limitation will apply for the calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013.
Ta omejitev bo veljala za koledarska leta 2011, 2012 in 2013.
The company will not be granted any kind of State aid until the end of 2015.
Družbi se do konca leta 2015 ne bo odobrila nobena vrsta državne pomoči.
This includes any funding from local, regional, national and EU sources.
To vključuje morebitno financiranje iz lokalnih, regionalnih in nacionalnih virov ter virov EU.
A ‘liquidation’ value equal to […] % of the assets’ market value would give a ‘liquidation’ value of EUR […] million. Consequently, the ‘liquidation’ value of the company’s real estate assets was equal 1 year after the rescheduling to […] % of its outstanding loans.
Ta odstotek bi pomenil izgubo ob neplačilu v višini […] %, kar je pod […] %.
This percentage would give an LGD of […] %, therefore, below […] %. On this basis, the rescheduled loan’s collateralisation would be considered high.
Na podlagi tega bi se zavarovanje reprogramiranih posojil s premoženjem štelo za visoko.
In 2009 the company had 205 employees on average (down from 212 in 2008) and a turnover of EUR 19 million.
Leta 2009 je imela družba v povprečju 205 zaposlenih (kar je manj kot v letu 2008, ko je imela 212 zaposlenih) in 19 milijonov EUR prometa.
On the basis of 2007 data, it ranked 10th in the Greek textile market.
Na podlagi podatkov za leto 2007 je bila na grškem trgu tekstila na 10. mestu.
of 14 July 2011
z dne 14. julija 2011
correcting Directive 2010/19/EU amending, for the purposes of adaptation to technical progress in the field of spray-suppression systems of certain categories of motor vehicles and their trailers, Council Directive 91/226/EEC, and Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the amendment of the Annexes to Directive 2007/46/EC
o popravku Direktive 2010/19/EU o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/226/EGS in Direktive 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku na področju sistemov za preprečevanje škropljenja izpod koles za nekatere kategorije motornih in priklopnih vozil v zvezi s spremembo prilog k Direktivi 2007/46/ES
Having regard to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) [1], and in particular Article 39(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2007/46/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. septembra 2007 o vzpostavitvi okvira za odobritev motornih in priklopnih vozil ter sistemov, sestavnih delov in samostojnih tehničnih enot, namenjenih za taka vozila (Okvirna direktiva) [1] ter zlasti člena 39(2) Direktive,
An error has occurred in the adoption of Commission Directive 2010/19/EU of 9 March 2010 amending, for the purposes of adaptation to technical progress in the field of spray-suppression systems of certain categories of motor vehicles and their trailers, Council Directive 91/226/EEC and Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
Pri sprejetju Direktive Komisije 2010/19/EU z dne 9. marca 2010 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/226/EGS in Direktive 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku na področju sistemov za preprečevanje škropljenja izpod koles za nekatere kategorije motornih in priklopnih vozil [2] je prišlo do napake.
Directive 2010/19/EU introduced harmonised requirements with regard to spray-suppression for all vehicle categories covered by Council Directive 91/226/EEC [3].
Z Direktivo 2010/19/EU so bile uvedene usklajene zahteve v zvezi s sistemi za preprečevanje škropljenja izpod koles za vse kategorije vozil iz Direktive Sveta 91/226/EGS [3].
Accordingly, Annexes IV and XI to Directive 2007/46/EC were also amended in that Directive for the purposes of adaptation to technical progress.
V skladu s tem sta bili spremenjeni tudi prilogi IV in XI k Direktivi 2007/46/ES v navedeni direktivi zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku.
Article 2 of Directive 2010/19/EU should therefore be deleted.
Zato je treba člen 2 Direktive 2010/19/EU črtati.
The measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Technical Committee – Motor Vehicles,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem Tehničnega odbora za motorna vozila –
Article 2 of Directive 2010/19/EU is deleted.
V Direktivi 2010/19/EU se črta člen 2.
As those Annexes have already been replaced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1060/2008 of 7 October 2008 replacing Annexes I, III, IV, VI, VII, XI and XV to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) [4] and amended by several regulations, their subsequent amendments should also have been done by means of a regulation.
Ker sta bili navedeni prilogi že nadomeščeni z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1060/2008 z dne 7. oktobra 2008 o nadomestitvi prilog I, III, IV, VI, VII, XI in XV k Direktivi 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi okvira za odobritev motornih in priklopnih vozil ter sistemov, sestavnih delov in samostojnih tehničnih enot, namenjenih za taka vozila (Okvirna direktiva) [4] ter spremenjeni z več uredbami, je treba njune naknadne spremembe uvesti tudi z uredbo.
It is therefore appropriate, in the interest of legal clarity, to correct Directive 2010/19/EU.
Zato je zaradi pravne jasnosti primerno popraviti Direktivo 2010/19/EU.
approving certain amended programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases and zoonoses for the year 2011 and amending Decision 2010/712/EU as regards the financial contribution from the Union for certain programmes approved by that Decision
o odobritvi nekaterih spremenjenih programov za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni in zoonoz za leto 2011 in spremembi Sklepa 2010/712/EU glede finančnega prispevka Unije za nekatere programe, odobrene z navedenim sklepom
Commission Decision 2008/341/EC of 25 April 2008 laying down Community criteria for national programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases and zoonoses [2] provides that in order to be approved under the Union financial measures programmes submitted by the Member States must meet at least the criteria set out in the Annex to that Decision.
Odločba Komisije 2008/341/ES z dne 25. aprila 2008 o določitvi meril Skupnosti za nacionalne programe za izkoreninjenje, nadzor in spremljanje nekaterih živalskih bolezni in zoonoz [2] določa, da morajo programi, ki jih predložijo države članice, za odobritev v skladu s programi finančnih ukrepov Unije izpolnjevati vsaj merila iz Priloge k navedeni odločbi.
Commission Decision 2010/712/EU of 23 November 2010 approving annual and multiannual programmes and the financial contribution from the Union for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases and zoonoses presented by the Member States for 2011 and following years [3] approves certain national programmes and sets out the rate and maximum amount of financial contribution from the Union for each programme submitted by the Member States.
S Sklepom Komisije 2010/712/EU z dne 23. novembra 2010 o odobritvi letnih in večletnih programov ter finančnega prispevka Unije za izkoreninjenje, nadzor in spremljanje nekaterih živalskih bolezni in zoonoz, ki so jih države članice predložile za leto 2011 in naslednja leta [3], so bili odobreni nekateri nacionalni programi ter določena stopnja in najvišji znesek finančnega prispevka Unije za vsak program, ki ga predložijo države članice.
Spain submitted an amended programme for the monitoring and eradication of bluetongue to introduce compulsory vaccination against serotype 8 in certain regions following outbreaks of that disease.
Španija je po izbruhu bolezni modrikastega jezika predložila spremenjen program za spremljanje in izkoreninjenje navedene bolezni za uvedbo obveznega cepljenja proti serotipu 8 v nekaterih regijah.
Slovakia submitted an amended vaccination programme for the eradication of rabies to extend the area in which baits are distributed, following the occurrence of the disease in bordering areas of Poland.
Slovaška je po pojavu stekline na mejnih območjih Poljske predložila spremenjen program cepljenja za izkoreninjenje bolezni za razširitev območja, na katerem so razdeljene vabe.
Poland and Finland have submitted amended programmes for the eradication of rabies to include oral vaccination activities in certain areas of neighbouring third countries adjacent to the Union, in order to protect the Union from a reintroduction of rabies through the movement of infected wild animals across the common borders.
Poljska in Finska sta predložili spremenjena programa za izkoreninjenje stekline za vključitev dejavnosti oralnega cepljenja na nekaterih območjih sosednjih tretjih držav, ki mejijo na Unijo, da se zaščiti Unijo pred ponovnim pojavom stekline z gibanjem okuženih prosto živečih živali na skupnih mejah.
The Commission has assessed the amended programmes submitted by Spain, Poland, Slovakia and Finland from both the veterinary and the financial point of view.
Komisija je spremenjene programe, ki so jih predložile Španija, Poljska, Slovaška in Finska, ocenila z veterinarskega in finančnega vidika.
The programmes were found to comply with relevant Union veterinary legislation and in particular with the criteria set out in Decision 2008/341/EC.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so programi skladni z ustrezno veterinarsko zakonodajo Unije in zlasti z merili iz Odločbe 2008/341/ES.
The amended programmes submitted by Spain, Poland, Slovakia and Finland should therefore be approved.
Spremenjene programe, ki so jih predložile Španija, Poljska, Slovaška in Finska je zato treba odobriti.
Decision 2010/712/EU provides for a financial contribution from the Union for Slovakia for those oral vaccination activities included in the annual programme for the eradication of rabies in that Member State that are implemented in bordering areas of neighbouring third countries.
Sklep 2010/712/EU določa finančni prispevek Unije za Slovaško za tiste dejavnosti oralnega cepljenja, vključene v letni program za izkoreninjenje stekline v navedeni državi članici, ki se izvajajo na mejnih območjih sosednjih tretjih držav.
In addition, that Decision provides for a financial contribution from the Union for Lithuania for those oral vaccination activities included in the multiannual programme for the eradication of rabies in that Member State that are implemented in bordering areas of neighbouring third countries.
Navedeni sklep določa finančni prispevek Unije za Litvo za tiste dejavnosti oralnega cepljenja, vključene v večletni program za izkoreninjenje stekline v navedeni državi članici, ki se izvajajo na mejnih območjih sosednjih tretjih držav.
It is therefore appropriate to also provide for a financial contribution from the Union for those parts of the programmes for the eradication of rabies in Poland and Finland that are implemented in bordering areas of neighboring third countries adjacent to the Union.
Zato je tudi primerno zagotoviti finančni prispevek Unije za tiste dele programov za izkoreninjenje stekline na Poljskem in Finskem, ki se izvajajo na mejnih območjih sosednjih tretjih držav, ki mejijo na Unijo.
The approval by this Decision of the amended programmes for the eradication of rabies submitted by Poland and Finland has an impact on the amounts needed for carrying out the programmes for those Member States as approved under Decision 2010/712/EU.
S tem sklepom odobrena spremenjena programa za izkoreninjenje stekline, ki sta ju predložili Poljska in Finska, vplivata na znesek, potreben za izvajanje programov za navedeni državi članici, ki je odobren s Sklepom 2010/712/EU.
The maximum amount of Union financial contribution for the programmes for the eradication of rabies in Poland and Finland, laid down in that Decision, should therefore be adjusted accordingly.
Najvišji znesek finančnega prispevka Unije za programe za izkoreninjenje stekline na Poljskem in Finskem, določen v navedenem sklepu, je zato treba ustrezno prilagoditi.
Decision 2010/712/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Sklep 2010/712/EU je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The amended programme for the monitoring and eradication of bluetongue submitted by Spain on 1 February 2011 is hereby approved for the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011.
Spremenjeni program za spremljanje in izkoreninjenje bolezni modrikastega jezika, ki ga je 1. februarja 2011 predložila Španija, se odobri za obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011.
The amended programmes for the eradication of rabies submitted by Poland on 5 April 2011, by Slovakia on 13 December 2010 and by Finland on 12 April 2011 are hereby approved for the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011.
Spremenjeni programi za izkoreninjenje stekline, ki so jih predložile Poljska (5. aprila 2011), Slovaška (13. decembra 2010) in Finska (12. aprila 2011), se odobrijo za obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011.
Article 10 of Decision 2010/712/EU is amended as follows:
Člen 10 Sklepa 2010/712/EU se spremeni:
EUR 7110000 for Poland;
7110000 EUR za Poljsko;
EUR 200000 for Finland.’;
200000 EUR za Finsko.“
Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 and 3, for the parts of the Polish, Slovakian and Finnish programmes that will be implemented outside the Union territory, the financial contribution by the Union shall:
Ne glede na odstavka 2 in 3 je za dele poljskega, slovaškega in finskega programa, ki bodo izvedeni zunaj ozemlja Unije, finančni prispevek Unije:
not exceed:
ne več kot
EUR 630000 for Poland;
630000 EUR za Poljsko;
EUR 65000 for Finland.’.
65000 EUR za Finsko.“
OJ L 309, 25.11.2010, p. 18.
UL L 309, 25.11.2010, str. 18.
abrogating Decision 2010/408/EU on the existence of an excessive deficit in Finland
o razveljavitvi Sklepa 2010/408/EU o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Finskem
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 126(12) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 126(12) Pogodbe,
By Decision 2010/408/EU [1], following a proposal from the Commission in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty, the Council decided that an excessive deficit existed in Finland.
S Sklepom 2010/408/EU [1] je bilo po priporočilu Komisije v skladu s členom 126(6) Pogodbe odločeno, da na Finskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj.
In Decision 2010/408/EU, the Council noted that the general government deficit planned for 2010 was 4,1 % of GDP, above the 3 % of GDP Treaty reference value, while general government gross debt was planned to reach 49,9 % of GDP, below the 60 % of GDP Treaty reference value.
Svet je v navedenem sklepu opozoril, da je predvideni javnofinančni primanjkljaj za leto 2010 znašal 4,1 % BDP, kar je nad referenčno vrednostjo 3 % BDP iz Pogodbe, medtem ko naj bi bruto javni dolg po pričakovanjih dosegel 49,9 % BDP, kar je pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP iz Pogodbe.
In accordance with Article 126(12) of the Treaty, a Council Decision on the existence of an excessive deficit is to be abrogated when the excessive deficit in the Member State concerned has, in the view of the Council, been corrected.
V skladu s členom 126(12) Pogodbe je treba sklepe Sveta o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja razveljaviti, če se je čezmerni primanjkljaj v zadevni državi članici po mnenju Sveta ustrezno zmanjšal.
In accordance with Article 4 of the Protocol (No 12) on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaties, the Commission provides the data for the implementation of this procedure.
V skladu s členom 4 Protokola (št. 12) o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priložen pogodbama, Komisija zagotovi podatke za izvajanje postopka.
As part of the application of this Protocol, Member States are to notify data on government deficits and debt and other associated variables twice a year, namely before 1 April and before 1 October, in accordance with Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 of 25 May 2009 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community [3].
Države članice v okviru uporabe navedenega protokola uradno sporočijo podatke o javnofinančnem primanjkljaju in dolgu ter drugih s tem povezanih spremenljivkah dva krat na leto in sicer do 1. aprila in do 1. oktobra, v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 479/2009 z dne 25. maja 2009 o uporabi Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti [3].
Based on data provided by the Commission (Eurostat) in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 following the notification by Finland before 1 April 2011 and on the Commission services’ spring 2011 forecast, the following conclusions are warranted:
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je zagotovila Komisija (Eurostat) v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2009 po uradnem obvestilu, ki ga je Finska poslala pred 1. aprilom 2011 in na podlagi napovedi služb Komisije iz pomladi 2011 se utemeljijo naslednji sklepi:
while the EDP notification of April 2010 planned for a deficit of 4,1 % of GDP in 2010, the actual outcome was considerably better at a deficit of 2,5 % of GDP,
V uradnem obvestilu o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem iz aprila 2010 je bil napovedan primanjkljaj v vrednosti 4,1 % BDP za leto 2010. Dejanski rezultat je bil veliko boljši, saj je primanjkljaj znašal 2,5 % BDP.
the better-than-planned deficit outturn is primarily explained by stronger-than-expected economic growth and an improved labour market situation boosting tax revenues (notably VAT and income tax), while expenditure growth remained overall contained,
Boljši rezultat od pričakovanega se v glavnem razlaga z gospodarsko rastjo, ki je presegla pričakovanja, ter izboljšanimi razmerami na trgu dela, zaradi česar so se povečali prihodki od davkov (zlasti DDV in davka na dohodek), medtem ko je bila rast odhodkov na splošno omejena.
The deficit is forecast by both the Commission services and the 2011 update of the stability programme to marginally improve further to 0,7 % of GDP in 2012,
Po napovedih služb Komisije in posodobljene različice programa za stabilnost za leto 2011 naj bi se primanjkljaj v letu 2012 še dodatno malo izboljšal, in sicer na 0,7 % BDP.
according to the Commission services’ spring 2011 forecast and the structural balances (recalculated by the Commission services on the basis of the information in the latest stability programme update, using the commonly agreed methodology) in 2011, the structural balance is estimated to reach a more favourable level than the medium-term objective, which is set by the Finnish authorities at a structural surplus of 0,5 % of GDP.
V skladu z napovedjo služb Komisije iz pomladi 2011 in strukturnim saldom (ki so ga izračunale službe Komisije na podlagi informacij iz najnovejše posodobitve programa za stabilnost z uporabo enotne metodologije) v letu 2011 se ocenjuje, da bo strukturni saldo ugodnejši od srednjeročnega cilja, ki so ga finski organi opredelili kot strukturni presežek v višini 0,5 % BDP.
However, the structural balance is estimated to weaken somewhat and turn negative in the medium term.
Vendar se ocenjuje, da se bo strukturni saldo malo poslabšal in srednjeročno dosegel negativne vrednosti.