natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where another Contracting Party wishes to become Party to a dispute, it may join the process of constituting a ad hoc panel, unless the original Parties to the dispute disagree.
Če želi katera koli druga pogodbenica postati stranka v sporu, se lahko pridruži v postopku sestave ad hoc razsodišča, razen če se s tem ne strinjajo prvotne pogodbenice v sporu.
The Contracting Party wishing to become a party to the dispute should notify this intention within 15 days after having received the notification referred to in paragraph 2.
Pogodbenica, ki želi postati stranka v sporu, mora svojo namero sporočiti v roku 15 dni po prejemu obvestila iz odstavka 2.
No sooner than 30 days and no later than 45 days after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, the Contracting Parties to the dispute shall notify the Executive Secretary of the constitution of the ad hoc panel, including the names of the panellists and the time schedule for its work.
Ne prej kot 30 dni in ne pozneje kot 45 dni po obvestilu iz odstavka 2 pogodbenice v sporu obvestijo izvršilnega sekretarja o sestavi ad hoc razsodišča, vključno z imeni članov razsodišča in časovnim razporedom dela razsodišča.
Unless the Parties agree otherwise, the following shall apply:
Razen če se stranke ne dogovorijo drugače, velja naslednje:
the ad hoc panel shall consist of three members;
ad hoc razsodišče ima tri člane;
the Contracting Parties to the dispute shall each select one panellist and agree on the third panellist;
vsaka pogodbenica v sporu izbere enega člana, skupaj pa določijo tretjega člana;
the third panellist shall chair the ad hoc panel;
tretji član predseduje ad hoc razsodišču;
the third panellist shall not be a national of either Contracting Party to the dispute and shall not be of the same nationality as either of the first two panellists; and
tretji član razsodišča ni državljan nobene pogodbenice v sporu in nima enakega državljanstva kot druga dva člana razsodišča; in
in case of a dispute between more than two Contracting Parties, Contracting Parties to the dispute which are of the same interest shall select one panellist jointly.
v primeru spora med več kot dvema pogodbenicama pogodbenice v sporu, ki imajo enak interes, skupaj izberejo enega člana razsodišča.
If the Parties to the dispute can not agree on the nomination of the third panellist, the President of the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea shall make the appointment, unless the Contracting Parties to the dispute agree that the appointment be made by another person or a third State.
Če se stranke v sporu ne uspejo dogovoriti o imenovanju tretjega člana razsodišča, ga imenuje predsednik Mednarodnega sodišča za pomorsko mednarodno pravo, razen če se pogodbenice v sporu strinjajo, da ga imenuje druga oseba ali tretja država.
Any Contracting Party, which is not a Party to the dispute, may attend all hearings of the ad hoc panel, make written and oral submissions to the ad hoc panel and receive the submissions of each Party to the dispute.
Vsaka pogodbenica, ki ni stranka v sporu, se lahko udeleži vseh obravnav ad hoc razsodišča, poda pisna in ustna stališča ad hoc razsodišču in prejme stališča vseh strank v sporu.
At the request of a Contracting Party to the dispute, or on its own initiative, the ad hoc panel may seek information and technical advice from any person or body that it deems appropriate, provided that the Parties to the dispute so agree.
Ad hoc razsodišče lahko, na zahtevo pogodbenice v sporu ali na lastno pobudo, zaprosi za informacije in tehnični nasvet katero koli osebo ali organ, ki se mu zdi primeren, pod pogojem, da se s tem strinjajo stranke v sporu.
Unless the Contracting Parties to the dispute otherwise agree, the ad hoc panel shall, within 90 days from the constitution of the ad hoc panel, make its report and recommendations referred to in Article XV paragraph 4 of the Convention.
Ad hoc razsodišče v roku 90 dni po sestavi ad hoc razsodišča pripravi poročilo in priporočila iz odstavka 4 člena XV te konvencije, razen če se pogodbenice v sporu ne dogovorijo drugače.
The report and recommendations shall be confined to the subject matter of the dispute and state the reasons on which they are based.
Poročilo in priporočila so omejeni na vsebino spora in navajajo razloge, na katerih temeljijo.
The report and recommendations shall be communicated promptly, through the Executive Secretary, to all Contracting Parties.
Poročilo in priporočila izvršilni sekretar takoj pošlje vsem pogodbenicam.
The ad hoc panel shall aim at reaching a consensus in its conclusions.
Ad hoc razsodišče si prizadeva, da v svojih sklepih doseže soglasje.
If this is not possible the ad hoc panel shall reach its conclusions by a majority of its members, who may not abstain from voting.
Če to ni mogoče, ad hoc razsodišče zaključke sprejme z večino svojih članov, ki se glasovanja ne smejo vzdržati.
The ad hoc panel may adopt any rules of procedure, which it deems necessary to accelerate the proceedings.
Ad hoc razsodišče lahko sprejme kateri koli poslovnik, za katerega meni, da je nujen za pospešitev postopkov.
Costs of the ad hoc panel shall be borne by the Contracting Parties to the dispute in equal parts.
Stroške ad hoc razsodišča nosijo pogodbenice v sporu, v enakih deležih.
In relation to the ad hoc panel established pursuant to Article XIV paragraphs 7 and 8, the Parties shall be deemed to be the Commission and the objecting Contracting Party and the provisions of this Annex shall apply, with the exceptions of paragraphs 3 and 4(e).
V zvezi z ad hoc razsodiščem, ustanovljenim v skladu z odstavkoma 7 in 8 člena XIV, se šteje, da sta stranki Komisija in nasprotujoča pogodbenica, veljajo pa določbe te priloge, z izjemo odstavkov 3 in 4(e).
Nothing in this Convention shall prejudice the rights, jurisdiction and duties of Contracting Parties under the 1982 Convention or the 1995 Agreement.
Nobena določba v tej konvenciji ne posega v pravice, pristojnost in dolžnosti pogodbenic po Konvenciji iz leta 1982 ali Sporazumu iz leta 1995.
This Convention shall be interpreted and applied in the context of and in a manner consistent with the 1982 Convention and the 1995 Agreement.
Ta konvencija se razlaga in uporablja v sobesedilu in na način v skladu s Konvencijo iz leta 1982 in Sporazumom iz leta 1995.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to give the notification provided for in Article XXI(3) of the Convention in order to bind the Union. Article 3
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo, pooblaščeno za uradno obvestilo iz člena XXI(3) Konvencije, s katerim izrazi, da so spremembe za Unijo zavezujoče [2].Člen 3
Measures adopted by the Commission for the allocation of fishing opportunities in the Regulatory Area shall take into account the interests of Contracting Parties whose vessels have traditionally fished within that area and the interests of the relevant coastal States. In the allocation of fishing opportunities from the Grand Bank and Flemish Cap, the Commission shall give special consideration to the Contracting Party whose coastal communities are primarily dependent on fishing activities for stocks related to these fishing banks and which has undertaken extensive efforts to ensure the conservation of such stocks through international action, in particular, by providing surveillance and inspection of international fishing activities on these banks under an international scheme of joint enforcement.
Ukrepi, ki jih Komisija sprejme za dodelitev ribolovnih možnosti v urejevalnem območju, upoštevajo interese pogodbenic, katerih plovila tradicionalno lovijo ribe na tem območju, in interese zadevnih obalnih držav. v zvezi z dodelitvijo ribolovnih možnosti na Velikih plitvinah in Flamskem rtu Komisija zlasti upošteva pogodbenico, katere obalne skupnosti so prednostno odvisne od ribolovnih dejavnosti za staleže v teh ribolovnih plitvinah in ki si močno prizadevajo za ohranjanje takih staležev z mednarodnimi ukrepi, zlasti z zagotavljanjem nadzora in inšpekcij mednarodnih ribolovnih dejavnosti v teh plitvinah po mednarodnem programu skupnih inšpekcijskih pregledov.
amending the status with regard to the European Union of the island of Saint-Barthélemy
o spremembi položaja otoka Saint-Barthélemy v razmerju do Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 355(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti odstavka 6 člena 355 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the initiative of the French Republic,
ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Francije,
Article 355 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) allows the European Council, on the initiative of the Member State concerned and acting unanimously after consulting the Commission, to adopt a decision amending the status, with regard to the Union, of a Danish, French or Netherlands country or territory referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 355.
Člen 355 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), omogoča, da Evropski svet na pobudo zadevne države članice po posvetovanju s Komisijo soglasno sprejme sklep o spremembi položaja posameznih danskih, francoskih ali nizozemskih dežel ali ozemelj iz odstavkov 1 in 2 člena 355 v razmerju do Unije.
In a letter from the French President dated 30 June 2010, the French Republic (hereinafter ‘France’) asked the European Council to take such a decision as regards the island of Saint-Barthélemy which is referred to in Article 355(1) of the TFEU.
Republika Francija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Francija) je s pismom svojega predsednika z dne 30. junija 2010 Evropski svet zaprosila, naj sprejme takšen sklep v zvezi z otokom Saint-Barthélemy, ki je naveden v odstavku 1 člena 355 PDEU.
France has requested that the status of this island should change from that of outermost region, covered by Article 349 of the TFEU, to that of overseas country or territory, covered by Part Four of the TFEU.
Francija zahteva, da se položaj tega otoka, ki je trenutno položaj najbolj oddaljene regije in je določen v členu 349 PDEU, spremeni v položaj čezmorskih držav in ozemelj iz četrtega dela PDEU.
France’s request reflects the desire expressed by the elected representatives of the island of Saint-Barthélemy, which is a French overseas collectivity, governed by Article 74 of the French Constitution, with autonomy, to obtain a status with regard to the Union which would be better suited to its status under national law, particularly given its remoteness from the mainland, its small insular economy largely devoted to tourism and subject to difficulties in obtaining supplies which hamper the application of some Union standards.
Zahteva Francije je v skladu z voljo, ki so jo izrazili izvoljeni predstavniki otoka Saint-Barthélemy, ki znotraj Republike Francije predstavlja avtonomno čezmorsko skupnost, ki je določena v členu 74 francoske ustave in ji je dodeljena avtonomija, da se ji dodeli položaj v razmerju Unije, ki je bolj ustrezen tistemu, ki ga ima po nacionalnem pravu, zlasti kar zadeva njeno fizično oddaljenost od celinskega dela Francije, njeno majhno otoško gospodarstvo, ki je osredotočeno samo na turizem in ki ima konkretne težave z oskrbo, s čimer je otežena uporaba dela predpisov Unije.
France has undertaken to conclude the agreements necessary to ensure that the interests of the Union are preserved when this change takes place.
Francija si prizadeva za sklenitev sporazumov, ki bodo zaradi te spremembe potrebni za zaščito interesov Unije.
These agreements should relate firstly to monetary matters, as France intends to retain the euro as the sole currency on Saint-Barthélemy and it must be ensured that the application of the law of the Union in the essential fields of the good functioning of economic and monetary union is maintained.
Ti sporazumi bi morali po eni strani zadevati monetarno področje, ker Francija namerava ohraniti euro kot enotno valuto na Saint-Barthélemyju in ker je treba zagotoviti, da se na področjih, bistvenih za dobro delovanje ekonomske in monetarne unije, še naprej uporablja pravni red Unije.
Secondly, such agreements should relate to taxation and aim to guarantee that the mechanisms of Council Directive 77/799/EEC of 19 December 1977 concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation and taxation of insurance premiums [1] and Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments [2], which aim in particular at combating fraud and cross-border tax evasion, will continue to apply in future to the territory of Saint-Barthélemy.
Po drugi strani bi morali zadevati obdavčevanje in imeti cilj zagotavljati, da se mehanizmi Direktive Sveta 77/799/EGS z dne 19. decembra 1977 o medsebojni pomoči pristojnih organov držav članic na področju neposrednega obdavčevanja in obdavčevanja zavarovalnih premij [1] in Direktive Sveta 2003/48/ES z dne 3. junija 2003 o obdavčevanju dohodka od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti [2], namenjeni zlasti preprečevanju čezmejne davčne utaje in izogibanja plačilu davka, še naprej uporabljajo na ozemlju Saint-Barthélemyja.
The citizens of Saint-Barthélemy should remain citizens of the Union and should enjoy the same rights and freedoms within the Union as other French citizens, just as all citizens of the Union should continue to benefit from the same rights and freedoms in Saint-Barthélemy as they do now.
Državljani Saint-Barthélemyja bi morali ostajati državljani Unije in biti v Uniji deležni enakih pravic in svoboščin kot drugi francoski državljani, prav tako kot bi morali na Saint-Barthélemy vsi državljani Unije nadalje uživati enake pravice in svoboščine kot sedaj.
As a result, the change in the status with regard to the Union, of the island of Saint-Barthélemy, in response to the democratically expressed request of its elected representatives, should not jeopardise the Union’s interests and should be consistent with the access of the island to autonomous status under national law,
Glede na navedeno sprememba položaja otoka Saint-Barthélemy v razmerju do Unije, ki ustreza demokratično izraženi zahtevi njegovih izvoljenih predstavnikov, ne bi smela ogroziti interesov Unije in bi morala predstavljati skladno fazo s pridobitvijo avtonomnega položaja otoka po nacionalnem pravu –
With effect from 1 January 2012, the island of Saint-Barthélemy shall cease to be an outermost region of the Union and shall have the status of overseas country or territory referred to in Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Otok Saint-Barthélemy od 1. januarja 2012 preneha biti najbolj oddaljena regija Unije in pridobi status čezmorske države in ozemlja iz četrtega dela Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
The TFEU shall consequently be amended as follows:
PDEU se zato spremeni:
in the first paragraph of Article 349, the words ‘Saint-Barthélemy’ shall be deleted;
besedilo „Saint-Barthélemyja“ iz prvega odstavka člena 349 se črta;
in Article 355(1), the words ‘Saint-Barthélemy’ shall be deleted;
besedilo „Saint-Barthélemyja“ iz odstavka 1 člena 355 se črta;
in Annex II, an indent shall be inserted, between that relating to ‘Saint Pierre and Miquelon’ and that relating to ‘Aruba’, which shall read as follows:
Prilogi II se med alineo za Saint Pierre in Miquelon in alineo za Arubo doda alinea:
Saint-Barthélemy,’.
Saint-Barthélemy,“.
declining the solution proposed by Austria under Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 relating to the calculation of the private use component of a compensation to the VAT own resources base resulting from the restriction of the right to deduct VAT under Article 176 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC
o zavrnitvi rešitve, ki jo je predlagala Avstrija v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 v zvezi z izračunom komponente zasebne rabe pri nadomestilu za osnovo za lastna sredstva iz naslova DDV na podlagi omejitve pravice do odbitka DDV v skladu s členom 176 Uredbe Sveta 2006/112/ES
(notified under document C(2010) 8206)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8206)
The compensation to the VAT resources base is based on Article 6(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89, which provides that where a Member State restricts or excludes, on the basis of Article 176 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the Common system of value added tax [2], the right to deduct input VAT, then the VAT own resources base may be determined as if the right of deduction had not been restricted.
Nadomestilo za osnovo za sredstva iz naslova DDV temelji na členu 6(4) Uredbe (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89, ki določa, da če država članica na podlagi člena 176 Direktive Sveta 2006/112/ES z dne 28. novembra 2006 o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost [2] omeji ali izključi pravico do odbitka vhodnega DDV, se osnova za lastna sredstva iz naslova DDV lahko določi, kakor da pravica do odbitka ne bi bila omejena.
This applies only in respect of the purchase of petroleum products and passenger cars used for business purposes, and of expenditure relating to the lease, hire, maintenance and repair of such cars.
Ta določba se uporablja samo za nakup naftnih derivatov in osebnih vozil za uporabo v službene namene ter za izdatke v zvezi z leasingom, najemom, vzdrževanjem in popravili teh vozil.
Austria proposed a solution for the calculation of the private use component of such a compensation to the harmonised VAT own resources base.
Avstrija je predlagala rešitev za izračun komponente zasebne rabe pri takem nadomestilu za usklajeno osnovo za lastna sredstva iz naslova DDV.
A draft decision declining the solution presented by Austria was submitted to the Advisory Committee on Own Resources which delivered a positive opinion on 26 October 2010.
Predlog sklepa o zavrnitvi rešitve, ki jo je predlagala Avstrija, je bil predložen Svetovalnemu odboru za lastna sredstva, ki je 26. oktobra 2010 o njem izdal pozitivno mnenje.
However, for reasons of administrative simplicity, Austria has proposed a solution for the calculation of private use incorporating general statistical data combined with value depreciation amounts, not devised for determining private use as such.
Zaradi administrativne poenostavitve pa je Avstrija predlagala rešitev za izračun zasebne rabe, ki vključuje splošne statistične podatke v kombinaciji z zneski amortizacije, ki niso oblikovani za določanje zasebne uporabe.
This Decision is addressed to Austria.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Avstrijo.
Done at Brussels, 26 November 2010.
V Bruslju, 26. novembra 2010
Pursuant to Article 13(3) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89, the solution proposed by Austria was examined by the Advisory Committee on Own Resources at its meeting on 26 October 2010.
V skladu s členom 13(3) Uredbe (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 je Svetovalni odbor za lastna sredstva na seji 26. oktobra 2010 proučil rešitev, ki jo je predlagala Avstrija.
The examination of the methodology revealed a difference of opinion in the Committee.
Pri pregledu metodologije je prišlo do razhajanj v mnenjih članov Odbora.
authorising Portugal to use data relating to years earlier than the last year but one in order to calculate the VAT own resources base
o pooblastitvi Portugalske, da za izračun osnove za lastna sredstva iz naslova DDV uporabi podatke iz let pred predzadnjim letom
(notified under document C(2010) 8209)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8209)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax [1], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 4(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 z dne 29. maja 1989 o dokončni enotni ureditvi zbiranja lastnih sredstev, pridobljenih iz davka na dodano vrednost [1], in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 4(4) Uredbe,
Portugal has requested authorisation from the Commission to use national accounts for years earlier than the last year but one in order to calculate the VAT own resources base for the financial year 2009.
Portugalska je Komisijo zaprosila za pooblastitev, da za izračun osnove za lastna sredstva iz naslova DDV za proračunsko leto 2009 uporabi nacionalne račune za leta pred predzadnjim letom.
For the purposes of the breakdown of transactions by statistical category provided for in Article 4(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89, Portugal is unable to use national accounts relating to the last year but one before the financial year for which VAT resources base is to be calculated, since only the national accounts relating to 2006 are sufficiently detailed to enable the weighted average rate to be calculated for the financial year 2009.
Pri razčlenitvi transakcij po statističnih kategorijah v skladu s členom 4(4) Uredbe (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 Portugalska ne more uporabiti nacionalnih računov za predzadnje leto pred proračunskim letom, za katero je treba izračunati osnovo za lastna sredstva iz naslova DDV, ker so samo nacionalni računi za leto 2006 dovolj podrobni, da omogočajo izračun ponderirane povprečne vrednosti za proračunsko leto 2009.
Portugal should therefore be authorised to use national accounts relating to 2006 in order to calculate the weighted average rate for the financial year 2009,
Portugalsko je zato treba pooblastiti, da za izračun ponderirane povprečne vrednosti za proračunsko leto 2009 uporabi nacionalne račune za leto 2006 –
For the purposes of the breakdown of transactions by statistical category, Portugal is authorised to use data taken from the national accounts relating to 2006 in order to calculate the VAT own resources base for the financial year 2009.
Portugalska je pooblaščena, da pri razčlenitvi transakcij po statističnih kategorijah uporabi podatke iz nacionalnih računov za leto 2006 za izračun osnove za lastna sredstva iz naslova DDV za proračunsko leto 2009.
on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies in France concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) for the 2008 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov nekaterih plačilnih agencij v Franciji v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), za proračunsko leto 2008
(notified under document C(2010) 8220)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8220)
Commission Decisions 2009/373/EC [2] and 2010/59/EU [3] cleared, for the 2008 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the German paying agency ‘Bayern’, the Greek paying agency ‘OPEKEPE’, the French paying agency ‘ODARC’ and the Italian paying agency ‘ARBEA’.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2009/373/ES [2] in Sklepom Komisije 2010/59/EU [3] so bili za proračunsko leto 2008 potrjeni obračuni vseh plačilnih agencij razen obračunov nemške plačilne agencije Bayern, grške plačilne agencije OPEKEPE, francoske plačilne agencije ODARC in italijanske plačilne agencije ARBEA.
Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the French paying agency ‘ODARC’.
Po prejetju novih informacij in dodatnih preverjanjih lahko Komisija zdaj v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), sprejme sklep o celovitosti, točnosti in verodostojnosti obračunov, ki jih je predložila francoska plačilna agencija ODARC.
The accounts of the French paying agency ‘ODARC’ concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in respect of the 2008 financial year, are hereby cleared.
Obračuni francoske plačilne agencije ODARC v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), za proračunsko leto 2008 se s tem sklepom potrdijo.