natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The charge in question, levied on advertising companies, appears to run counter to the general principle, regularly asserted by the Commission and confirmed by the Court in its judgment in Case 47/69 France v Commission [1970] ECR 487, that imported products and services must be exempt from all parafiscal charges intended to finance an aid scheme which benefits national undertakings only.
Zadevna dajatev za oglaševanje se zato zdi v nasprotju s splošnim načelom, ki ga je Komisija večkrat izrazila, Sodišče pa potrdilo v sodbi z dne 25. junija 1970 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (47/69, Recueil, str. 487), po kateri morajo biti uvoženi proizvodi ali storitve oproščeni vsakršnih parafiskalnih dajatev, namenjenih financiranju sheme pomoči, katere upravičenci so izključno nacionalna podjetja.
The Court referred to this assessment in paragraph 115 of its Régie Networks judgment.
Sodišče omenja to analizo v točki 115 sodbe v zadevi Régie Networks.
The Commission takes the view that the non-exemption of radio broadcasting services delivered in France by radio stations which are located in other Member States and cannot benefit from aid under the notified aid scheme adversely affects trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Komisija meni, da neoprostitev dajatev na storitve oddajanja prek radijskih valov, ki jih v Franciji opravljajo postaje s sedežem v drugih državah članicah in ki niso upravičene do pomoči, dodeljene iz naslova priglašene sheme, spreminja trgovinske pogoje v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
Even though the general purpose of the aid component of the notified scheme may be legitimate and may be regarded as compatible with the internal market, the same cannot be said of the method of financing it.
Četudi bi bil splošni cilj pomoči upravičencem iz priglašene sheme legitimen in bi se lahko obravnaval kot združljiv z notranjim trgom, pa to ne velja za način financiranja te sheme.
Under these circumstances, the Commission concludes that the aid scheme can be declared compatible with the internal market, in particular as regards the criteria set out in Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Komisija v skladu s tem ugotavlja, da se lahko shema pomoči razglasi za združljivo z notranjim trgom, zlasti z enim merilom iz člena 107(3)(c) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
On the other hand, the Commission cannot approve the method of financing the scheme.
Komisija pa nasprotno ne more odobriti načina financiranja te sheme.
The Commission has noted the impossibility, alleged by the French authorities in their letter of 23 April 2009, of identifying (among the payers of the parafiscal charge used to finance the aid scheme) the foreign operators who provided radio broadcasting services in France delivered by radio stations or companies located in other Member States during the period covered by the aid scheme in question.
Francoski organi so Komisiji v zvezi s tem v dopisu z dne 23. aprila 2009 navedli, da (med plačniki parafiskalne dajatve, s katero se financira shema pomoči,) ne morejo ugotoviti istovetnosti tujih operaterjev, ki opravljajo storitve radijskega oddajanja v Franciji s postaj ali oglaševalskih agencij s sedežem v drugih državah članicah v obdobju, ki ga zajema zadevna shema pomoči.
The Commission can admit the existence of administrative difficulties preventing their identification, given that the facts date far back in time.
Komisija lahko prizna obstoj upravnih težav, zaradi katerih ni mogoče ugotoviti njihove istovetnosti glede na to, da so dejstva stara.
Nevertheless, on the basis of the explanations submitted by the French authorities, in the case in question the passage of time does not in itself appear to constitute an insurmountable obstacle to identifying who is liable to pay the charge.
Vendar se na podlagi tega sklepa morajo obvestiti vse operaterje, ki bi lahko bili upravičeni do povračila dajatve, vpojasnil, ki so jih posredovali francoski organi, zdi, da pretečeni čas v tej zadevi ni sam po sebi nepremostljiva ovira pri ugotavljanju istovetnosti subjektov, zavezanih plačilu dajatve.
In reply, the French authorities stated that it was not always possible to establish, on the basis of the data available to them, whether the persons liable for the charge were companies broadcasting from French territory or from another Member State.
Francoski organi so kot odgovor navedli, da na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov niso mogli vedno določiti, ali so bili subjekti, zavezani plačilu dajatve, podjetja, ki so oddajala s francoskega ozemlja ali z ozemlja druge države članice.
In this case, they have to send individual notices to the persons liable for the charge, within six months of the date when this decision is notified, informing them of their specific right to reimbursement if they have been broadcasting to France from another Member State.
V takem primeru morajo v šestih mesecih od priglasitve tega sklepa vsakemu subjektu, zavezanemu plačilu dajatve, posebej poslati uradno obvestilo o posebni pravici do povračila, če je v Francijo oddajal z ozemlja druge države članice.
The authorities must use all the available means to identify the persons liable for the charge.
Uprava mora uporabiti vsa možna sredstva, ki jih ima na voljo, da ugotovi istovetnost subjektov, zavezanih plačilu dajatve.
However, since it is not certain that the French authorities can identify all the persons liable for the charge, they also have the duty to conduct an adequate campaign advertising the reimbursement measures, so that the operators concerned can come forward.
Vendar, ker ni gotovo, da bi lahko francoski organi sami ugotovili istovetnost vseh subjektov, zavezanih plačilu te dajatve, bo njihova naloga tudi, da izvedejo ustrezno oglaševalsko kampanjo o ukrepih povračila, tako da bi se lahko javili zadevni operaterji.
France shall send the operators concerned individual notices informing them of their specific right to reimbursement in each case where the French authorities are able to identify them and shall also ensure adequate publicity, especially by publishing advertisements in specialist periodicals throughout the European Union [14],
Francija mora vsakemu zadevnemu operaterju posebej poslati uradno obvestilo o njegovi posebni pravici do povračila, vsakič kadar bi lahko francoski organi ugotovili njegovo istovetnost, izvesti pa mora tudi ustrezno oglaševalsko kampanjo, zlasti z objavami oglasov v specializiranih revijah po vsej Evropski uniji [14],
the persons liable for the charge shall be given three years from the date of the adequate publicity to submit the reimbursement request [15],
subjekti, zavezani plačilu dajatve, morajo imeti triletni rok od objave ustrezne oglaševalske kampanje za vložitev vloge za povračilo [15],
reimbursement shall be made within a maximum period of six months from the date of submission of the request [16],added to the amounts reimbursed shall be the interest actually accrued from the date when they were collected until the date of the actual reimbursement, calculated on a compound basis using as an objective benchmark rate, by analogy, the rate referred to in Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [17],the French authorities shall accept all reasonable proof submitted by the operators in question demonstrating that they have paid the charge,
povračilo je treba izplačati najpozneje v šestih mesecih od datuma vložitve vloge [16],zneske za povračilo je treba povečati za dejansko obračunane obresti od datuma, ko so bili prejeti, do datuma dejanskega povračila, izračunane na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa, pri tem pa je treba kot referenco upoštevati stvarno stopnjo, po analogiji tisto iz člena 9 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [17],francoski organi morajo sprejeti vsako ustrezno dokazilo o plačilu dajatve, ki ga predložijo zadevni operaterji,
the right to reimbursement cannot be subjected to any other conditions,
za pravico do povračila ne smejo veljati drugi pogoji,
the French authorities shall send the Commission regular reports concerning the reimbursement procedure, every six months starting from the date when this decision is notified,
francoski organi bodo Komisiji o stanju postopka povračila pošiljali redna poročila vsakih šest mesecev od datuma priglasitve tega sklepa –
The aid scheme introduced by France is compatible with the internal market subject to the conditions laid down in Article 2.
Shema pomoči, ki jo je izvajala Francija, je združljiva z notranjim trgom pod pogoji iz člena 2.
The French authorities shall give them three years to submit a reimbursement request [18].
V šestih mesecih od datuma priglasitve tega sklepa morajo obvestiti vse operaterje, ki bi lahko bili upravičeni do povračila dajatve, v vsakem primeru, v katerem lahko ugotovijo njihovo istovetnost, in jih z ustrezno oglaševalsko kampanjo pozvati, da se lahko javijo, pri čemer jim mora zagotoviti triletni rok za vložitev vlog za povračilo [18].
Following such a call and on the basis of the evidence presented by the operators in question, France shall, within six months at most from the date of submission of the reimbursement request, reimburse the amount of charges incompatible with the internal market plus the interest actually accrued, calculated on a compound basis using as an objective benchmark rate, by analogy, the rate referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Francija mora po takem pozivu in na podlagi dokazil, ki jih posredujejo zadevni operaterji, najpozneje v šestih mesecih od datuma vložitve vloge za povračilo povrniti znesek dajatev, nezdružljivih z notranjim trgom, ki ga je treba povečati za dejansko obračunane obresti, izračunane na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa, pri tem pa je treba kot referenco upoštevati stvarno stopnjo, po analogiji tisto iz člena 9 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.
Within two months of the date on which this Decision is notified, France shall inform the Commission of the measures taken to comply with it.
Francija v dveh mesecih od datuma, ko je bila uradno obveščena o tem sklepu, obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
It shall send the Commission regular reports concerning the reimbursement procedure referred to in Article 2, every six months starting from the date on which this Decision is notified until the end of a three-year period starting from the date of the last adequate publicity measures referred to in Article 2.
Komisiji bo o stanju postopka povračila iz člena 2 pošiljala redna poročila vsakih šest mesecev od datuma, ko je bila o sklepu uradno obveščena, do preteka treh let od zadnje ustrezne oglaševalske kampanje, omenjene v členu 2.
From 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Z učinkom od 1. decembra 2009 sta člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES postala člen 107 oziroma člen 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The two sets of provisions are identical in substance.
Določbe novih členov so vsebinsko povsem enake prejšnjima členoma.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanje na člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije razumeti kot sklicevanje na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
OJ C 223, 16.9.2009, p. 15. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:C:2009:223:0015:0019:EN:PDF
UL C 223, 16.9.2009, str. 15. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:C:2009:223:0015:0019:SL:PDF.
Decree 92-1053 of 30 September 1992.
Odlok št. 92-1053, 30.9.1992.
Letter to the French authorities of 10 November 1997, State aid N 679/97, OJ C 120, 1.5.1999, p. 2; http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:C:1999:120:0002:0002:EN:PDF
Dopis francoskim organom z dne 10. novembra 1997, državna pomoč št. N 679/97, UL C 120, 1.5.1999, str. 2. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:C:1999:120:0002:0002:FR:PDF.
State aid NN 42/03 (ex N 752/02), OJ C 219, 16.9.2003, p. 3. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:C:2003:219:0002:0003:EN:PDF; http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/comp-2003/nn042-03.pdf
Državna pomoč št. NN 42/03 (ex N752/02), UL C 219, 16.9.2003, str. 3. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:C:2003:219:0002:0003:FR:PDF; http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/comp-2003/nn042-03.pdf.
See recital 14.
Glej uvodno izjavo 14.
Official Journal of the French Republic, 30.12.1997, p. 19194.
UL FR, 30.12.1997, str. 19194.
State aid NN 42/03 (ex N 752/02), OJ C 219, 16.9.2003, p. 3.
Državna pomoč št. NN 42/03 (ex N752/02), UL C 219, 16.9.2003, str. 3.
See note 5.
Glej opombo 5.
See footnote 10.
Prim. opombo 10.
Case C-333/07, Régie Networks v Direction de Contrôle Fiscal Rhône-Alpes Bourgogne; http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = CELEX:62007C0333:EN:HTML
Sodba z dne 26. junija 2008 v zadevi Régie Networks, C-333/07; http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = CELEX:62007C0333:SL:HTML
Within its 2003 borders.
V okviru njenih meja iz leta 2003.
This is the normal response time in relations between the tax authorities and taxpayers in France and can be regarded as reasonable.
To je običajen rok za odziv v medsebojnih odnosih med davčno upravo in davkoplačevalci v Franciji ter se lahko obravnava kot razumen.
This period was specified in the Commission Decision of 14 December 2004 concerning the tax on meat purchases (rendering tax) implemented by France.
To obdobje je bilo določeno v Odločbi Komisije z dne 14. decembra 2004 o dajatvi na odkup mesa (dajatev na predelavo klavnih trupov), ki jo je uvedla Francija.
It appears to be reasonable and there is no reason not to apply it in this case.
Zdi se razumno in ni nobenega razloga, da bi od njega v tej zadevi odstopali.
In accordance with the conditions set out in recital 34.
Glede na pogoje iz uvodne izjave 34.
On 22 December 2008 the Court of Justice of the European Union declared that the Commission Decision of 10 November 1997 concerning the period 1997-2002 was invalid.
Sodišče Evropske unije je 22. decembra 2008 razveljavilo Odločbo Komisije z dne 10. novembra 1997 v zvezi z obdobjem veljavnosti med 1997 in 2002.
Consequently, the Commission took all the necessary measures to rectify the illegality identified and has re-examined the information provided by the French authorities (for a detailed description of this procedure, see chapter 3 ‘Grounds for initiating the procedure’).
Komisija je od tedaj sprejela vse potrebne ukrepe za odpravo ugotovljenega nezakonitega stanja ter je ponovno proučila informacije, ki jih je prejela od francoskih organov (za podroben opis tega postopka glej oddelek 3 z naslovom „Razlogi za sprožitev postopka“).
‘The charge shall be levied on the sums, exclusive of agency fees and value added tax, paid by advertisers for the broadcasting of their advertisements to French territory.
„Dajatev se izračuna na podlagi zneskov brez provizije agencije in brez davka na dodano vrednost, ki jih oglaševalci plačujejo za oddajanje oglasov, namenjenih za francosko ozemlje.
Those liable to pay the tax are the persons responsible for marketing such advertisements.
Zavezanci za to dajatev so osebe, ki tržijo te oddaje z oglasnimi sporočili.
There is nothing to prevent France from enabling these unknown operators to exercise their right to the reimbursement of undue taxes paid between 1997 and 2002.
Dejansko ne more nič preprečiti Franciji, da bi tem neznanim operaterjem omogočila uveljavitev njihove pravice do povračila neupravičeno plačanih dajatev v obdobju med 1997 in 2002.
France could rectify the incompatibility of the method of financing aid scheme by reimbursing the amount that is incompatible with the internal market in accordance with the following criteria:
Francija bo lahko odpravila nezdružljivost načina financiranja sheme pomoči s povračilom zneska dajatev, ki ni skladen z notranjim trgom, v skladu z naslednjimi merili:
To remove the discrimination suffered by foreign broadcasters who paid the charge on advertising companies to the French State without the possibility of benefiting from the aid scheme, the French authorities shall reimburse the parafiscal charge collected from foreign operators between 1997 and 2002. Within six months of the date when this decision is notified, they shall inform all the operators who paid the charges to be reimbursed, in each case where they can identify them and send notices, by means of adequate publicity, so that the operators concerned can come forward.
Francoski organi morajo izvršiti povračilo parafiskalnih dajatev, ki so se zaračunavale tujim operaterjem v obdobju med 1997 in 2002, da bi odpravili diskriminacijo tujih radijskih postaj, ki so Franciji plačevale dajatev na oglaševanje, niso pa imele možnosti prejemati pomoči iz sheme pomoči.
On 3 August 2004, Régie Network, the advertising arm of a major French radio station, NRJ, challenged the charge paid in 2001 (EUR 152524) before the Lyon courts. The case was referred to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the validity of the Commission Decision of 10 November 1997 approving the aid.
Régie Networks, oglaševalska podružnica velike zveze francoskih radijskih postaj, in sicer NRJ, je 3. avgusta 2004 pred sodiščem v Lyonu izpodbijala dajatev, plačano leta 2001 (152524 EUR).Zadeva je bila Sodišču EU predložena v predhodno odločanje, da se presodi veljavnost odločbe Komisije z dne 10. novembra 1997 o dodelitvi pomoči.
of 2 March 2011
z dne 2. marca 2011
Having regard to Decision No 574/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ [1], and in particular Article 25 and Article 37(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe št. 574/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Sklada za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ [1] ter zlasti člena 25 in člena 37(4) Odločbe,
In the light of the experience gained since the launch of the External Borders Fund, it is appropriate to clarify the obligations in Commission Decision 2008/456/EC [2] relating to transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination when implementing projects.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih od začetka delovanja Sklada za zunanje meje, je primerno pojasniti obveznosti iz Odločbe Komisije 2008/456/ES [2] v zvezi s preglednostjo, enakim obravnavanjem in nediskriminacijo pri izvajanju projektov.
Member States are required to report on the implementation of the annual programmes.
Države članice morajo poročati o izvajanju letnih programov.
It is therefore appropriate to clarify which information Member States have to provide.
Zato je primerno pojasniti, katere informacije morajo zagotoviti države članice.
In order to reduce the administrative burden on the Member States and to provide greater legal certainty the rules on the eligibility of expenditure of actions co-financed by the External Borders Fund should be simplified and clarified.
Da bi omejili upravna bremena držav članic in zagotovili večjo pravno varnost, je treba poenostaviti in pojasniti pravila o upravičenosti izdatkov za projekte, sofinancirane iz Sklada za zunanje meje.
Most of the changes introduced by this Decision should apply immediately.
Večina sprememb, ki jih uvaja ta sklep, bi morala začeti veljati takoj.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark has implemented Decision No 574/2007/EC in its national law and is therefore bound by this Decision.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, je Danska Odločbo št. 574/2007/ES prenesla v svojo nacionalno zakonodajo in zato jo ta sklep zavezuje.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [3] and the subsequent Council Decision 2004/926/EC of 22 December 2004 on the putting into effect of parts of the Schengen acquis by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [4].
Ta sklep je del razvoja določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri izvajanju katerih Združeno kraljestvo v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [3] ter poznejšim Sklepom Sveta 2004/926/ES z dne 22. decembra 2004 o izvajanju delov schengenskega pravnega reda s strani Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske [4] ne sodeluje.
The United Kingdom is therefore not bound by it or subject to its application.
Sklep zato zanj ni zavezujoč niti se v njem ne uporablja.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [5].
Ta sklep je del razvoja določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri izvajanju katerih Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [5].
Ireland is therefore not bound by it or subject to its application.
Sklep zato zanjo ni zavezujoč niti se zanjo ne uporablja.
As regards Iceland and Norway, Decision No 574/2007/EC constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [6], which fall within the areas referred to in Article 1, points A and B of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [7].
Kar zadeva Islandijo in Norveško, Odločba št. 574/2007/ES pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [6], kar spada v področje iz točk A in B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo Sporazuma, sklenjenega med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško, v zvezi s pridružitvijo teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [7].