natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported types a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses (‘SG&A’) and a reasonable margin of profit.
V skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da se je proizvodnim stroškom izvoženih vrst izdelka prištel razumni znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („stroški PSA“) ter razumna stopnja dobička.
Pursuant to Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, the amounts for SG&A and profit margin were based on the average SG&A and profit margin of Heze sales in the ordinary course of trade of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe so zneski stroškov PSA in stopnja dobička temeljili na povprečnih stroških PSA in stopnji dobička pri prodaji družbe Heze v običajnem poteku trgovanja s podobnim izdelkom.
In line with the methodology used in the original investigation, the cost of manufacturing was calculated for two types of products.
V skladu z metodologijo, uporabljeno v prvotni preiskavi, je bil proizvodni strošek izračunan za dve vrsti izdelka.
Taking into account the information provided by the applicant, one cost of manufacturing was calculated for granules and tablets and a second one for powder.
Ob upoštevanju informacij, ki jih je predložil vložnik, je bil en proizvodni strošek izračunan za izdelek v zrncih in tabletah, drugi proizvodni strošek pa za izdelek v prahu.
As the product concerned was exported directly to independent customers in the Union, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable for the product when sold for export to the Union.
Ker se je zadevni izdelek izvažal neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, tj. na osnovi izvoznih cen, ki so se za izdelek dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo pri izvozni prodaji v Unijo.
The average normal value and the average export price for each type of the product concerned were compared on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade.
Povprečna normalna vrednost in povprečna izvozna cena za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka sta se primerjali na podlagi franko tovarna in na isti ravni trgovanja.
In order to ensure a fair comparison between normal value and export price, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike v dejavnikih, za katere se je izkazalo, da so vplivale na cene in na primerljivost cen.
For this purpose, adjustments for transport costs, ocean freight and insurance costs, handling, credit costs, and bank charges were made where applicable and justified.
Zato so bile, kadar je bilo primerno in upravičeno, narejene prilagoditve za stroške prevoza, čezmorskega prevoza in stroške zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške, stroške posojil in bančne stroške.
Furthermore, it was found that VAT was partially refunded when the product concerned was sold for export to the Union.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil DDV delno povrnjen, kadar je bil zadevni izdelek prodan za izvoz v Unijo.
Consequently, the VAT payable on domestic sales was adjusted accordingly pursuant to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bil DDV, ki se plačuje za domačo prodajo, ustrezno prilagojen v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe.
With regard to the packing cost allowance, the applicant claimed an allowance in respect of packing expenses for sales in both the Chinese and the Union markets.
V zvezi s nadomestilom za stroške pakiranja je vložnik zahteval nadomestilo v zvezi s stroški pakiranja za prodajo na kitajskem trgu in trgu Unije.
The verification showed that those costs were equally included in the cost of production of the product regardless of whether it was to be sold domestically or for export.
Preveritev je pokazala, da so bili navedeni stroški vključeni v proizvodne stroške izdelka ne glede na to, ali je bil namenjen za prodajo na domačem trgu ali za izvoz.
Therefore, the allowance claimed was not accepted either in the domestic or in the export market.
Zato zahtevano nadomestilo ni bil odobren niti za domači trg niti za izvozni trg.
The dumping margin of Heze expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Union-frontier price was found to be 3,2 %.
Stopnja dampinga za družbo Heze, izražena kot odstotek za neto ceno franko meja Unije, je bila 3,2 %.
LASTING NATURE OF CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES
TRAJNA NARAVA SPREMENJENIH OKOLIŠČIN
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances which were found to exist could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je preučilo tudi, ali se ugotovljene spremenjene okoliščine lahko upravičeno štejejo kot trajne narave.
The applicant provided full cooperation in this interim review and the data collected and verified allowed for the establishment of a dumping margin based on its individual export prices to the Union.
Vložnik je v tem vmesnem pregledu v celoti sodeloval, z zbranimi in preverjenimi podatki pa je bila mogoča določitev stopnje dampinga na podlagi njegovih posameznih izvoznih cen za Unijo.
Evidence obtained and verified during the investigation showed a reduction in the level of dumping explained by the reduction of the company cost structure.
Dokazi, dobljeni in preverjeni med preiskavo, so pokazali zmanjšanje stopnje dampinga, kar se lahko pojasni z zmanjšanjem strukture stroškov družbe.
The main factors to trigger the reduction in the applicant’s cost structure are the in-house production of the main raw material and the expansion in the applicant’s production capacity.
Glavna dejavnika za zmanjšanje strukture stroškov vložnika sta interna proizvodnja glavne surovine in povečanje njegove proizvodne zmogljivosti.
It was also found that since the original investigation, Heze’s export prices to all markets increased.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so se od prvotne preiskave izvozne cene družbe Heze povečale za vse trge.
In particular, export prices to the Union are in line with the company’s export prices to other third countries.
Zlasti so izvozne cene za Unijo v skladu z izvoznimi cenami družbe za druge tretje države.
Evidence collected on spot showed that the company has many Union customers with similar price levels.
Dokazi, zbrani na kraju samem, so pokazali, da ima družba številne stranke v Uniji s podobnimi ravnmi cen.
The consistent market behaviour of the applicant shows that the changes in circumstances are of a lasting nature.
Dosledno obnašanje vložnika na trgu kaže, da so spremembe okoliščin trajne narave.
In the light of the above, it is therefore considered that the circumstances that led to the initiation of this review are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the current review.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da se okoliščine, ki so privedle do začetka tega pregleda, v bližnji prihodnosti verjetno ne bodo toliko spremenile, da bi vplivale na ugotovitve iz sedanjega pregleda.
Therefore it is concluded that the changes are considered to be of a lasting nature and that the application of the measure at its current level is no longer justified.
Zato se sklene, da se spremembe štejejo kot trajne narave in da uporaba ukrepa na sedanji ravni ni več utemeljena.
In the light of the results of this review investigation, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from Heze to 3,2 %,
Glede na rezultate te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se zdi primerno spremeniti protidampinško dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka družbe Heze, na 3,2 % –
The entry concerning Heze Huayi Chemical Co. Limited, in the table in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1631/2005, shall be replaced by the following:
Vnos v zvezi z družbo Heze Huayi Chemical Co. Limited v razpredelnici iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) 1631/2005 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘PRC
„LRK
OJ L 261, 7.10.2005, p. 1.
UL L 261, 7.10.2005, str. 1.
OJ C 150, 2.7.2009, p. 14 (‘Notice of Initiation’).
UL C 150, 2.7.2009, str. 14 („Obvestilo o začetku“).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 856/2010
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 856/2010
terminating the partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 661/2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2008 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve za uvoz amonijevega nitrata s poreklom iz Rusije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 8, 9(4) and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), ter zlasti členov 8, 9(4) in 11(3) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 2022/1995 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate (‘AN’) originating in Russia, falling within CN codes 31023090 and 31024090.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2022/1995 [2] o uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev za uvoz amonijevega nitrata („AN“) s poreklom iz Rusije, ki sodi pod oznaki KN 31023090 in 31024090.
Pursuant to a further investigation in accordance with Article 12 of the basic Regulation, which established that the duty was being absorbed, the measures were amended by Regulation (EC) No 663/1998 [3].
Na podlagi nadaljnje preiskave v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe, v kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila dajatev odpravljena, so bili ukrepi spremenjeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 663/1998 [3].
Following a request for an expiry and an interim review pursuant to Articles 11(2) and 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 658/2002 [4], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of EUR 47,07 per tonne on imports of ammonium nitrate falling within CN codes 31023090 and 31024090 and originating in Russia.
Svet je po zahtevku za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa in za vmesni pregled v skladu s členoma 11(2) in 11(3) osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 658/2002 [4] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz amonijevega nitrata v višini 47,07 EUR na tono, ki spada pod oznaki KN 31023090 in 31024090 in s poreklom iz Rusije.
Finally, a product scope interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation was carried out and, by Regulation (EC) No 945/2005 [5], a definitive anti-dumping duty ranging between EUR 41,42 per tonne and EUR 47,07 per tonne was imposed on imports of solid fertilisers originating in Russia with an ammonium nitrate content exceeding 80 % by weight, falling within CN codes 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 and ex31059091.
Nazadnje je bil opravljen vmesni pregled obsega izdelka v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, z Uredbo (ES) št. 945/2005 [5] pa je bila uvedena dokončna protidampinška dajatev med 41,42 EUR na tono do 47,07 EUR na tono za uvoz trdnih gnojil s poreklom iz Rusije z deležem amonijevega nitrata, ki presega 80 mas. % in spada pod oznake KN 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 in ex31059091.
Following a request for an expiry and an interim review (‘the last expiry review’) pursuant to Articles 11(2) and 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 661/2008 [6], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty ranging between EUR 28,88 per tonne and EUR 47,07 per tonne for a further five years.
Na podlagi zahtevka za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa in za vmesni pregled („zadnji pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa“) v skladu s členoma 11(2) in 11(3) osnovne uredbe je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 661/2008 [6] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev med 28,88 EUR na tono do 47,07 EUR na tono za naslednjih pet let.
Following the decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities to partially annul Regulation (EC) No 945/2005, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 989/2009 [7], amended the definitive anti-dumping duty in so far as it concerned JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat.
Po odločitvi Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti, da delno razveljavi Uredbo (ES) št. 945/2005, je Svet z Uredbo št. 989/2009 [7] spremenil dokončno protidampinško dajatev glede družbe JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky Khimichesky Kombinat.
By Decision 2008/577/EC of 4 July 2008 [8], the Commission accepted undertaking offers submitted by several exporting producers, including the related Russian exporting producers Joint Stock Company Acron and Joint Stock Company Dorogobuzh (‘Acron’ Holding Company), in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia and Ukraine.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2008/577/ES z dne 4. julija 2008 [8] sprejela ponudbe o zavezi, ki so jih predložili številni proizvajalci izvozniki, vključno s povezanima ruskima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma Joint Stock Company Acron in Joint Stock Company Dorogobuzh (holdinška družba „Acron“), v zvezi s protidampinškim postopkom o uvozu amonijevega nitrata s poreklom iz Rusije in Ukrajine.
A request for a partial interim review (‘the present review’) pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation was lodged by JSC Acron, JSC Dorogobuzh and their related trading company Agronova International Inc., members of ‘Acron’ Holding Company (‘the applicant’).
Družbi JSC Acron in JSC Dorogobuzh ter njuna povezana trgovska družba Agronova International Inc., ki so člani holdinga „Acron“ Holding Company („vložnik“), so v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe vložili zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled („sedanji pregled“).
The request was limited in scope to the examination of the form of the measure and in particular to the inclusion of Agronova International Inc. into the price undertaking of JSC Acron and JSC Dorogobuzh.
Zahtevek je bil po obsegu omejen na preučitev oblike ukrepa in zlasti na vključitev družbe Agronova International Inc. v cenovno zavezo družb JSC Acron in JSC Dorogobuzh.
The Commission examined the prima facie evidence submitted by the applicant and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je proučila dokaze prima facie, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in ugotovila, da upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
After consulting the Advisory Committee, the Commission initiated [9] a review of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 661/2008 (‘measures in force’) limited in scope to the examination of the form of the measures, in particular the potential effect of the inclusion of Agronova International Inc. into the price undertaking of JSC Acron and JSC Dorogobuzh.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom začela [9] pregled protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 661/2008 („veljavni ukrepi“), ki so po obsegu omejeni na preučitve oblike ukrepov, zlasti morebitnega učinka vključitve družbe Agronova International Inc. v cenovno zavezo družb JSC Acron in JSC Dorogobuzh.
The product concerned by the present review is the same as in the last expiry review, i.e. solid fertilisers with an ammonium nitrate content exceeding 80 % by weight, originating in Russia (‘the product concerned’), currently falling within CN codes 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 and ex31059091.
Zadevni izdelek v sedanjem pregledu je enak izdelku iz zadnjega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, tj. trdna gnojila z deležem amonijevega nitrata, ki presega 80 mas. %, s poreklom iz Rusije („zadevni izdelek“), ki trenutno spada pod oznake KN 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 in ex31059091.
The Commission officially informed the applicant, the representatives of the exporting country and the association of Union producers of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda uradno obvestila vložnika, predstavnike države izvoznice in združenje proizvajalcev Unije.
All interested parties who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so to zahtevale in dokazale, da za to obstajajo posebni razlogi, je bilo zaslišanje odobreno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the applicant and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku poslala vprašalnike in v rokih za ta namen prejela odgovore.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse podatke, ki so bili po njenem mnenju potrebni.
The Commission carried out a verification visit at the premises of Agronova International Inc., Hallandale, USA (‘Agronova’).
Komisija je opravila preveritveni obisk v prostorih družbe Agronova International Inc., Hallandale, ZDA („Agronova“).
The review investigation period covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 (‘RIP’).
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom je zajelo obdobje od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 („RIP“).
The investigation confirmed that Agronova was a newly established trading company belonging to ‘Acron’ Holding company.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Agronova nova trgovinska družba, ki je v lasti holdinške družbe „Acron“.
Workability of the undertaking
Delovanje zaveze
The main considerations as to the inclusion of a trading company in the current undertaking were the practicability of the undertaking, i.e. the effectiveness of its monitoring and in particular assessing the risks of cross-compensation and circumvention through different sales channels and/or through the pricing of different products sold to potentially the same customers.
Glavni premisleki v zvezi z vključitvijo trgovinske družbe v sedanjo zavezo so bili izvedljivost zaveze, tj. učinkovitost njenega spremljanja ter zlasti ocena tveganja navzkrižne kompenzacije in izogibanja po različnih prodajnih kanalih in/ali pri oblikovanju cen različnih izdelkov, prodanih istim potencialnim strankam.
High risk of cross-compensation through an undisclosed trading company
Visoko tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije prek nerazkrite trgovinske družbe
The investigation revealed that Agronova had strong interpersonal and operational links to at least one other undisclosed company active in the trading and marketing of fertiliser products.
Preiskava je razkrila, da ima Agronova močne medosebne in operativne povezave z najmanj eno drugo nerazkrito družbo, ki trguje z gnojili in jih trži.
It was found that the same and only persons operating Agronova were in fact also involved in the activities of this trading company.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so vodilni v Agronovi iste in edine osebe, ki so vključene tudi v dejavnosti te trgovske družbe.
In particular, the evidence available showed that both companies shared a common manager and a common officer during most of the RIP, while a third person (who was at the same time found to be the President of the trading company in question), although not formally employed by Agronova, was in fact carrying out its daily trading business including the conduct during the verification visit on behalf of Agronova where he was presented as an advisor of Agronova.
Razpoložljivi dokazi so pokazali, da sta imeli med RIP obe družbi povečini istega direktorja in isto odgovorno osebo, medtem ko je tretja oseba (za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila hkrati tudi predsednik zadevne trgovinske družbe), čeprav ni bila uradno zaposlena v Agronovi, dejansko opravljala dnevno trgovanje, vključno z vodenjem preveritvenega obiska v imenu Agronove, ko je bila predstavljena kot svetovalec Agronove.
In addition to the strong interpersonal links, it was found that both companies were operating from the same office, employing the same secretary and using the same computers and office equipment during almost the entirety of the RIP.
Poleg tesnih medosebnih povezav je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da sta obe družbi med skoraj celotnim RIP delovali v isti pisarni, zaposlovali isto tajnico ter uporabljali iste računalnike in pisarniško opremo.
Agronova did not reveal the existence and operations of this other trading company neither in its response to the questionnaire nor at the time of the verification visit.
Agronova ni razkrila obstoja in delovanja te druge trgovske družbe niti v izpolnjenem vprašalniku niti med preveritvenim obiskom.
The Commission’s request for additional information in order to clarify the situation was only partly satisfied by the applicant since it did not, inter alia, disclose the precise ownership of the trading company nor its detailed activities.
Vložnik je zahtevo Komisije po dodatnih informacijah za pojasnitev situacije izpolnil le delno, saj med drugim ni razkril pravega lastništva te trgovinske družbe ali njenih podrobnih dejavnosti.
The information provided was therefore considered insufficient.
Zato se predložene informacije niso štele za zadostne.
On the basis of the above, the Commission considered that the trading company referred to above was related to Agronova within the meaning of Article 143 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (‘IPCCC’) [10] and should have been reported in the applicant’s reply to the questionnaire.
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija menila, da je navedena trgovinska družba povezana z Agronovo v smislu člena 143 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti („IPCCC“) [10] in bi morala biti navedena v izpolnjenem vprašalniku vložnika.
The Commission notified the applicant in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation of its intention to base these findings on facts available and invited the applicant to comment thereon in accordance with Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe uradno obvestila vložnika, da namerava te ugotovitve podpreti z razpoložljivimi dokazi, in ga zaprosila, da nanje predloži pripombe v skladu s členom 18(4) osnovne uredbe.
The applicant contested that Agronova is related to the above trading company or any other company.
Vložnik je nasprotoval trditvi, da je Agronova povezana z navedeno trgovinsko družbo ali katero koli družbo.
Furthermore, on the Commission’s further enquiry request, it did not provide any detailed and verifiable information on the ownership and activities of the trading company in question within the deadline set.
Poleg tega na zahtevo Komisije za nadaljnjo poizvedbo vložnik ni predložil nobenih podrobnih in preverljivih informacij o lastništvu in dejavnostih zadevne trgovinske družbe v določenem roku.
Upon disclosure of the Commission’s proposal to base findings on Article 18 of the basic Regulation, the applicant further denied any relationship between Agronova and the trading company in the sense of Article 143 of the IPCCC.
Po razkritju predloga Komisije, da bodo ugotovitve temeljile na členu 18 osnovne uredbe, je vložnik zanikal tudi kakršno koli povezavo med Agronovo in trgovinsko družbo v smislu člena 143 IPCCC.
As far as the precise roles of the persons involved in both companies, the applicant contested that both companies shared directors or officers.
Glede natančne vloge oseb, vpletenih v obe družbi, je vložnik nasprotoval trditvi, da imata obe družbi istega direktorja ali odgovorno osebo.
The applicant even withdrew information given before, claiming that it was wrong or imprecise.
Vložnik je celo umaknil predhodno predložene informacije, za katere je trdil, da so napačne ali netočne.