natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the basis of the data currently available on the prices for the products concerned and the criteria referred to in Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, the guide prices should be increased, maintained or reduced for the 2011 fishing year depending on the species.
Na podlagi trenutno dosegljivih podatkov o cenah zadevnih proizvodov in meril iz člena 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000 bi bilo treba priporočene cene za ribolovno leto 2011 povišati, ohraniti ali znižati glede na posamezne vrste.
It is appropriate to establish the Union producer price for one of the products listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 and calculate the Union producer prices for the others by means of the conversion factors established by Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2006 of 30 May 2006 fixing the conversion factors applicable to fish of the genera Thunnus and Euthynnus [2].
Primerno je določiti proizvodno ceno za Unijo za enega od proizvodov iz Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 104/2000 in s pretvorbenimi faktorji iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 802/2006 z dne 30. maja 2006 o določitvi pretvorbenih faktorjev za ribe rodov Thunnus in Euthynnus [2] izračunati proizvodne cene za Unijo za druge proizvode.
On the basis of the criteria laid down in the first and second indents of Article 18(2) and in Article 26(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, the Union producer price for the 2011 fishing year should be adjusted,
Na podlagi meril, opredeljenih v prvi in drugi alinei člena 18(2) in členu 26(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000, bi bilo treba proizvodno ceno za Unijo za ribolovno leto 2011 prilagoditi –
For the fishing year from 1 January to 31 December 2011, the guide prices as provided for in Article 18(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be as set out in Annex I to this Regulation.
Za ribolovno leto od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2011 se priporočene cene iz člena 18(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000 določijo v skladu s Prilogo I k tej uredbi.
For the fishing year from 1 January to 31 December 2011, the Union producer prices as provided for in Article 26(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be as set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Za ribolovno leto od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2011 se proizvodne cene za Unijo iz člena 26(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000 določijo v skladu s Prilogo II k tej uredbi.
Sardines of the species Sardina pilchardus
Sardine vrste Sardina pilchardus
from 1.1.2011 to 30.4.2011
od 1.1.2011 do 30.4.2011
from 1.5.2011 to 31.12.2011
od 1.5.2011 do 31.12.2011
Albacore or longfinned tunas (Thunnus alalunga)
Beli tun ali dolgoplavuti tun (Thunnus alalunga)
Whole
cel
Monkfish (Lophius spp.)
Morska spaka (Lophius spp.)
Frozen, in original packages containing the same products
Zamrznjene, v originalni embalaži, ki vsebuje enake proizvode
Frozen, whole, in original packages containing the same products
Zamrznjena, cela, v originalni embalaži, ki vsebuje enake proizvode
Frozen, filleted, in original packages containing the same products
Zamrznjen, v filejih, v originalni embalaži, ki vsebuje enake proizvode
Sea bream (Dentex dentex and Pagellus spp.)
Špar (Dentex dentex in Pagellus spp.)
Frozen, in lots or in original packages containing the same products
Zamrznjen, po delih ali v originalni embalaži, ki vsebuje enake proizvode
Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) (Rossia macrosoma) (Sepiola rondeletti)
Sipa (Sepia officinalis) (Rossia macrosoma) (Sepiola rondeletti)
Prawn of the species Parapenaeus longirostris
kozica vrste Parapenaeus longirostris
Other species of the family Penaeidae
druge vrste iz družine Penaeidae
Union producer price
Proizvodna cena za Unijo
Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1259/2010
implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation
o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo zakonske zveze in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 81(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 81(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to Council Decision 2010/405/EU of 12 July 2010 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation [1],
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2010/405/EU z dne 12. julija 2010 o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti [1],
The Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice, in which the free movement of persons is assured.
Unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjanja in razvijanja območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, v katerem je zagotovljeno prosto gibanje oseb.
For the gradual establishment of such an area, the Union must adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications, particularly when necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takšnega območja mora Unija sprejeti ukrepe na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi elementi, zlasti če je to potrebno za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
Pursuant to Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, those measures are to include measures aimed at ensuring the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning conflict of laws.
V skladu s členom 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije med te ukrepe spadajo tudi ukrepi, katerih cilj je zagotoviti združljivost predpisov, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah glede kolizije zakonov.
On 14 March 2005 the Commission adopted a Green Paper on applicable law and jurisdiction in divorce matters.
Komisija je 14. marca 2005 sprejela zeleno knjigo o pravu, ki se uporablja in sodni pristojnosti v zadevah, povezanih z razvezo zakonske zveze.
The Green Paper launched a wide-ranging public consultation on possible solutions to the problems that may arise under the current situation.
S tem se je začelo obsežno javno posvetovanje o možnih rešitvah za težave, ki bi lahko nastale v sedanjih razmerah.
On 17 July 2006 the Commission proposed a Regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 [2] as regards jurisdiction and introducing rules concerning applicable law in matrimonial matters.
Komisija je 17. julija 2006 predlagala spremembe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 [2] glede sodne pristojnosti in uvedbe pravil v zvezi s pravom, ki se uporablja v zakonskih sporih.
At its meeting in Luxembourg on 5 and 6 June 2008, the Council concluded that there was a lack of unanimity on the proposal and that there were insurmountable difficulties that made unanimity impossible both then and in the near future.
Svet je na zasedanju v Luksemburgu 5. in 6. junija 2008 ugotovil, da soglasja o predlogu ni in da ga zaradi nepremostljivih težav ne bo mogoče doseči ne takoj ne v bližnji prihodnosti.
It established that the proposal’s objectives could not be attained within a reasonable period by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
Ugotovil je tudi, da ciljev tega predloga z uporabo ustreznih določb Pogodb ne bo mogoče uresničiti v razumnem času.
Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia subsequently addressed a request to the Commission indicating that they intended to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of applicable law in matrimonial matters.
Belgija, Bolgarija, Nemčija, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Latvija, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Avstrija, Portugalska, Romunija in Slovenija so Komisiji nato poslale prošnjo, v kateri so sporočile, da nameravajo vzpostaviti okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju prava, ki se uporablja v zakonskih sporih.
On 12 July 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/405/EU authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.
Svet je 12. julija 2010 sprejel Sklep 2010/405/EU o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti.
According to Article 328(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, when enhanced cooperation is being established, it is to be open to all Member States, subject to compliance with any conditions of participation laid down by the authorising decision.
V skladu s členom 328(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije se lahko v okrepljeno sodelovanje ob vzpostavitvi vključi vsaka država članica, ki izpolnjuje morebitne pogoje za sodelovanje, določene v sklepu o odobritvi.
It is also to be open to them at any other time, subject to compliance with the acts already adopted within that framework, in addition to those conditions.
Vanj se lahko vključi tudi kadar koli pozneje, ob upoštevanju navedenih pogojev in v tem okviru že sprejetih aktov.
The Commission and the Member States participating in enhanced cooperation shall ensure that they promote participation by as many Member States as possible.
Komisija in države članice, ki že sodelujejo v okrepljenem sodelovanju, zagotovijo, da se spodbudi sodelovanje čim več držav članic.
This Regulation should be binding in its entirety and directly applicable only in the participating Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
Ta uredba bi morala biti v celoti zavezujoča in bi jo bilo treba neposredno uporabljati samo v sodelujočih državah članicah v skladu s Pogodbama.
This Regulation should create a clear, comprehensive legal framework in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation in the participating Member States, provide citizens with appropriate outcomes in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility, and prevent a situation from arising where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests.
S to uredbo bi bilo treba oblikovati jasen in celovit pravni okvir na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo zakonske zveze in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti v sodelujočih državah članicah, državljanom zagotoviti ustrezne rešitve glede pravne varnosti, predvidljivosti in prilagodljivosti, ter preprečiti primere, v katerih bi eden od zakoncev vložil tožbo za razvezo zakonske zveze pred drugim z namenom, da bi si zagotovil postopek v skladu s pravom, ki je po njegovem mnenju z vidika njegovih interesov ugodnejše.
The substantive scope and enacting terms of this Regulation should be consistent with Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003.
Vsebinsko področje uporabe te uredbe in njene določbe bi morali biti skladni z Uredbo (ES) št. 2201/2003.
However, it should not apply to marriage annulment.
Vendar se ta uredba ne bi smela uporabljati za razveljavitev zakonske zveze.
This Regulation should apply only to the dissolution or loosening of marriage ties.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati le za primere razpadlih ali razrahljanih zakonskih vezi.
The law determined by the conflict-of-laws rules of this Regulation should apply to the grounds for divorce and legal separation.
Za razloge za razvezo zakonske zveze in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti bi se moralo uporabljati pravo, ki ga določajo kolizijska pravila iz te uredbe.
Preliminary questions such as legal capacity and the validity of the marriage, and matters such as the effects of divorce or legal separation on property, name, parental responsibility, maintenance obligations or any other ancillary measures should be determined by the conflict-of-laws rules applicable in the participating Member State concerned.
Predhodna vprašanja, kot sta pravna sposobnost in veljavnost zakonske zveze, ter vprašanja, kot so premoženjske posledice razveze zakonske zveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti, ime, starševska odgovornost, preživninske obveznosti ali drugi morebitni pomožni ukrepi, bi morala določati kolizijska pravila, ki se uporabljajo v sodelujoči zadevni državi članici.
In order to clearly delimit the territorial scope of this Regulation, the Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation should be specified.
Za jasno določitev teritorialnega področja uporabe te uredbe je treba navesti države članice, vključene v okrepljeno sodelovanje.
This Regulation should be universal, i.e. it should be possible for its uniform conflict-of-laws rules to designate the law of a participating Member State, the law of a non-participating Member State or the law of a State which is not a member of the European Union.
Obstajati bi morala možnost univerzalne uporabe te uredbe, kar pomeni, da bi enotna kolizijska pravila omogočala določitev prava sodelujoče države članice, prava države članice, ki ne sodeluje ali prava države, ki ni članica Evropske unije.
This Regulation should apply irrespective of the nature of the court or tribunal seized.
To uredbo bi bilo treba uporabljati ne glede na vrsto sodišča, ki mu je zadeva predložena.
Where applicable, a court should be deemed to be seized in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003.
Po potrebi bi bilo treba šteti, da se je pred sodiščem začel postopek v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2201/2003.
In order to allow the spouses to choose an applicable law with which they have a close connection or, in the absence of such choice, in order that that law might apply to their divorce or legal separation, the law in question should apply even if it is not that of a participating Member State.
Da bi zakoncema omogočili svobodno izbiro prava, ki se uporablja in s katerim sta tesno povezana ali, če nimata možnosti izbire, da se to pravo uporablja za njuno razvezo zakonske zveze ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, bi bilo treba to pravo uporabljati tudi, če to ni pravo sodelujoče države članice.
Where the law of another Member State is designated, the network created by Council Decision 2001/470/EC of 28 May 2001 establishing a European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters [3], could play a part in assisting the courts with regard to the content of foreign law.
Kadar se določi pravo druge države članice, bi lahko mreža, ustanovljena s Sklepom Sveta 2001/470/ES z dne 28. maja 2001 o ustanovitvi Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [3], sodiščem dajala informacije glede vsebine tujega prava.
Increasing the mobility of citizens calls for more flexibility and greater legal certainty.
Zaradi vse večje mobilnosti državljanov je potrebna večja prožnost in hkrati tudi večja pravna varnost.
In order to achieve that objective, this Regulation should enhance the parties’ autonomy in the areas of divorce and legal separation by giving them a limited possibility to choose the law applicable to their divorce or legal separation.
Za dosego tega cilja bi morala ta uredba strankam v zadevah v zvezi z razvezo zakonske zveze in prenehanjem življenjske skupnosti zagotoviti večjo avtonomnost, in sicer tako, da bi jim do neke mere omogočala izbiro prava, ki bi se naj uporabilo za razvezo zakonske zveze ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti.
Spouses should be able to choose the law of a country with which they have a special connection or the law of the forum as the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.
Zakonca bi morala imeti možnost, da kot pravo, ki se uporabi za razvezo zakonske zveze in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, izbereta pravo države, s katero imata posebne vezi, ali pravo sodišča, pred katerim poteka postopek.
The law chosen by the spouses must be consonant with the fundamental rights recognised by the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Pravo, ki ga izbereta zakonca, mora biti skladno s temeljnimi pravicami, ki so priznane s Pogodbama in z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Before designating the applicable law, it is important for spouses to have access to up-to-date information concerning the essential aspects of national and Union law and of the procedures governing divorce and legal separation.
Preden se določi pravo, ki se uporablja, je pomembno, da imata zakonca dostop do najnovejših informacij glede bistvenih vidikov nacionalne zakonodaje in prava Unije ter postopkov na področju razveze zakonske zveze in prenehanja življenjske skupnosti.
To guarantee such access to appropriate, good-quality information, the Commission regularly updates it in the Internet-based public information system set up by Council Decision 2001/470/EC.
Da se zagotovi dostop do ustreznih in kakovostnih informacij, jih Komisija redno posodablja na spletnem informacijskem sistemu za javnost, ki je bil vzpostavljen s Sklepom Sveta 2001/470/ES.
The informed choice of both spouses is a basic principle of this Regulation.
Seznanitev obeh zakoncev o možnosti izbire je temeljno načelo te uredbe.
Each spouse should know exactly what are the legal and social implications of the choice of applicable law.
Vsak zakonec bi moral natančno vedeti, kakšne so pravne in socialne posledice izbire prava, ki se uporablja.
The possibility of choosing the applicable law by common agreement should be without prejudice to the rights of, and equal opportunities for, the two spouses.
Možnost, da se zakonca sporazumno dogovorita o pravu, ki se uporablja, ne bi smelo posegati v njune pravice in enake možnosti.
Hence judges in the participating Member States should be aware of the importance of an informed choice on the part of the two spouses concerning the legal implications of the choice-of-law agreement concluded.
Zato bi se morali sodniki iz sodelujočih držav članic zavedati pomena seznanitve zakoncev o možnostih izbire v zvezi s pravnimi posledicami sklenjenega dogovora o izbiri prava.
Rules on material and formal validity should be defined so that the informed choice of the spouses is facilitated and that their consent is respected with a view to ensuring legal certainty as well as better access to justice.
Določiti je treba pravila o materialni in formalni veljavnosti, da bi se omogočila lažja seznanitev zakoncev o možnostih izbire in zagotovilo spoštovanje njunega soglasja, s čimer se zagotovita pravna varnost in boljši dostop do sodstva.
As far as formal validity is concerned, certain safeguards should be introduced to ensure that spouses are aware of the implications of their choice.
Na področju formalne veljavnosti bi bilo treba uvesti določena jamstva, s katerimi bi se zagotovilo zavedanje zakoncev o posledicah svoje izbire.
The agreement on the choice of applicable law should at least be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both parties.
Stranki bi morali dogovor o izbiri prava, ki se uporabi, skleniti v pisni obliki z datumom in podpisom.
However, if the law of the participating Member State in which the two spouses have their habitual residence at the time the agreement is concluded lays down additional formal rules, those rules should be complied with.
Če pa so v pravu sodelujoče države članice, v kateri imata zakonca ob sklenitvi dogovora običajno prebivališče, določena dodatna formalna pravila, bi bilo treba uporabiti ta pravila.
For example, such additional formal rules may exist in a participating Member State where the agreement is inserted in a marriage contract.
Taka dodatna formalna pravila lahko na primer obstajajo v sodelujoči državi članici, kjer je dogovor vključen v pogodbo o ureditvi premoženjskopravnih razmerij med zakoncema.
If, at the time the agreement is concluded, the spouses are habitually resident in different participating Member States which lay down different formal rules, compliance with the formal rules of one of these States would suffice.
Če imata zakonca ob sklenitvi dogovora običajno prebivališče v različnih sodelujočih državah članicah, ki imajo različna formalna pravila, bi zadoščalo upoštevanje formalnih pravil ene od teh držav.
If, at the time the agreement is concluded, only one of the spouses is habitually resident in a participating Member State which lays down additional formal rules, these rules should be complied with.
Če ima le eden od zakoncev ob sklenitvi dogovora običajno prebivališče v sodelujoči državi članici, ki ima določena dodatna formalna pravila, bi bilo treba uporabiti ta pravila.
An agreement designating the applicable law should be able to be concluded and modified at the latest at the time the court is seized, and even during the course of the proceeding if the law of the forum so provides.
Dogovor o določitvi prava, ki se uporabi, bi moralo biti mogoče skleniti in spremeniti najpozneje do začetka postopka pred sodiščem, ki začne postopek, pa tudi med postopkom, če to dopušča pravo sodišča, pred katerim poteka postopek.
In that event, it should be sufficient for such designation to be recorded in court in accordance with the law of the forum.
V tem primeru bi moralo zadostovati, da tovrstni dogovor evidentira sodišče v skladu s svojim pravom.
Where no applicable law is chosen, and with a view to guaranteeing legal certainty and predictability and preventing a situation from arising in which one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he considers more favourable to his own interests, this Regulation should introduce harmonised conflict-of-laws rules on the basis of a scale of successive connecting factors based on the existence of a close connection between the spouses and the law concerned.
V primerih, ko pravo, ki se uporablja, ni izbrano, in zaradi zagotavljanja pravne varnosti in predvidljivosti, pa tudi preprečevanja primerov, ko bi eden od zakoncev vložil tožbo za razvezo zakonske zveze pred drugim, da bi si tako zagotovil, da bo postopek potekal v skladu s tistim pravom, ki je po njegovem mnenju z vidika njegovih interesov ugodnejše, bi morala ta uredba določiti usklajena kolizijska pravila na podlagi različnih naveznih okoliščin, ki temeljijo na obstoju tesne povezave med zakoncema in zadevnim pravom.
Such connecting factors should be chosen so as to ensure that proceedings relating to divorce or legal separation are governed by a law with which the spouses have a close connection.
Takšne navezne okoliščine bi bilo treba izbrati zato, da se zagotovi, da postopki glede razveze zakonske zveze ali prenehanja življenjske skupnosti potekajo v skladu s pravom države, s katero sta zakonca tesno povezana.
Where this Regulation refers to nationality as a connecting factor for the application of the law of a State, the question of how to deal with cases of multiple nationality should be left to national law, in full observance of the general principles of the European Union.
Kadar se v tej uredbi v zvezi z uporabo prava države kot navezna okoliščina navaja državljanstvo, naj bi se vprašanje, kako obravnavati primere večkratnega državljanstva, reševalo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, ob popolnem spoštovanju splošnih načel Evropske unije.
If the court is seized in order to convert a legal separation into divorce, and where the parties have not made any choice as to the law applicable, the law which applied to the legal separation should also apply to the divorce.
Če se pred sodiščem začne postopek, s katerim bi se prenehanje življenjske skupnosti spremenilo v razvezo zakonske zveze, in če pravo, ki se uporablja, ne bi bilo izbrano, bi bilo treba za razvezo zakonske zveze uporabiti pravo, ki se je uporabilo za prenehanje življenjske skupnosti.
Such continuity would promote predictability for the parties and increase legal certainty.
Takšna kontinuiteta bi strankam zagotovila predvidljivost in okrepila pravno varnost.
If the law applied to the legal separation does not provide for the conversion of legal separation into divorce, the divorce should be governed by the conflict-of-laws rules which apply in the absence of a choice by the parties.
Če v pravu, ki se je uporabilo za prenehanje življenjske skupnosti, ni predvidena sprememba prenehanja življenjske skupnosti v razvezo zakonske zveze, bi morala za razvezo zakonske zveze veljati kolizijska pravila, ki se uporabljajo, kadar pravo ni izbrano.
This should not prevent the spouses from seeking divorce on the basis of other rules in this Regulation.
To zakoncema ne bi smelo preprečevati, da bi zaprosila za razvezo zakonske zveze na podlagi drugih pravil iz te uredbe.