natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Should the revenue from these three tax sources not be sufficient to cover the gap of EUR 700 million between the traditional public service compensation (EUR 500 million) and the overall costs of running RTVE, which have so far been covered by commercial revenues, Article 2(2) of Law 8/2009 establishes that the missing funds would be contributed from the general state budget, in accordance with Article 33 of Law 17/2006 which obliges the government to cover the net costs of the public service obligations of RTVE.
Če prihodki iz teh treh davčnih virov ne bi zadostovali za kritje vrzeli v višini 700 milijonov EUR med običajnim nadomestilom za opravljanje javne službe (500 milijonov EUR) in skupnimi stroški vodenja RTVE, ki so bili doslej kriti s komercialnimi prihodki, člen 2(2) Zakona 8/2009 določa, da se manjkajoča sredstva priskrbijo iz splošnega državnega proračuna, v skladu s členom 33 Zakona 17/2006, ki vladi nalaga kritje neto stroškov obveznosti opravljanja javne službe, ki jo ima RTVE.
This means that the financing of the net costs of the public services provided by RTVE, up to a maximum amount of EUR 1200 million, will be assured, independently of the revenue generated by the taxes.
To pomeni, da bo financiranje neto stroškov javnih storitev, ki jih zagotavlja RTVE, v višini do največ 1200 milijonov EUR, zagotovljeno ne glede na prihodke iz naslova davkov.
Spain confirmed that the contribution from the taxes on TV broadcasters and telecommunications operators should not necessarily be used only to fund RTVE.
Španija je potrdila, da ni nujno, da se prispevki iz davkov, naloženih radiotelevizijam in telekomunikacijskim operaterjem, uporabljajo izključno za financiranje RTVE.
Spain has established the maximum amounts which may be contributed by the taxes.
Španija je določila najvišje zneske, ki se lahko ustvarijo z davki.
Any surplus revenue will be attributed to the general state budget and may thereby be used to cover other expenses.
Vsi presežni prihodki bodo dodeljeni splošnemu državnemu proračunu in jih je zato mogoče uporabiti za kritje drugih izdatkov.
Furthermore, up to these maximum amounts, Spain may decide what amount from the tax it actually intends to allocate for RTVE.
Poleg tega se lahko Španija do teh najvišjih zneskov odloči, kolikšen delež davka bo dejansko dodelila RTVE.
The budgetary planning for 2010, for example, provides for less than half the possible maximum contribution to be allocated to RTVE.
Na primer, proračunsko načrtovanje za leto 2010 določa, da se RTVE dodeli manj kot polovica najvišjega možnega prispevka.
Other new financial provisions
Druge nove finančne določbe
In order to avoid overcompensation, Article 8 of the new law provides for a reserve fund into which is paid the part of the revenues allocated by the government which exceeds the actual net costs of the public service obligation.
Za preprečitev prekomernega nadomestila člen 8 novega zakona predvideva rezervni sklad, v katerega se steka del prihodkov, dodeljenih s strani vlade, ki presega dejanske neto stroške obveznosti opravljanja javne službe.
This reserve is limited to 10 % of the annual budgeted expenses of RTVE.
Ta rezerva je omejena na 10 % letnih proračunskih stroškov javne službe RTVE.
Any revenues in excess of these 10 % will go back to the Treasury.
Vsi prihodki, ki presegajo teh 10 %, se vrnejo v proračun.
The reserve will be used to cover possible losses incurred in previous years.
Rezervna sredstva se uporabijo za kritje morebitnih izgub iz prejšnjih let.
If it has not been spent within 4 years, it will be recovered by reducing the public service compensation for the following year accordingly.
Če se rezervna sredstva ne porabijo v roku štirih let, se povrnejo tako, da se nadomestilo za javne storitve naslednje leto ustrezno zniža.
Furthermore, in accordance with Articles 37 and 39 to 41 of Law 17/2006, external control by auditors, the Government Audit Office, the Parliament, the audiovisual authority and the Court of Auditors will ensure that RTVE receives no compensation exceeding the actual net costs plus the 10 % reserve.
V skladu s členi 37 in 39 do 41 Zakona 17/2006 zunanji nadzor s strani revizorjev, vladnega revizorskega urada, parlamenta, avdiovizualnega sveta in Računskega sodišča zagotavlja, da RTVE ne prejme nadomestila, ki bi presegalo dejanske neto stroške in 10-odstotna rezervna sredstva.
Any revenue from the few remaining commercial activities will reduce the public service compensation (Article 7(1) of Law 8/2009).
Prihodki, ustvarjeni iz preostalih komercialnih dejavnosti, bodo zmanjšali nadomestilo za javne storitve (člen 7(1) Zakona 8/2009).
The issues analysed in this decision are those elements of the changes to the existing RTVE financing system concerning which the Commission expressed doubts in the decision to open the formal investigation procedure.
V tem sklepu so analizirani tisti elementi sprememb obstoječega sistema financiranja RTVE, v zvezi s katerimi je Komisija izrazila dvome v odločitvi o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave.
As the Commission stated, the main feature of the changes in the financing of RTVE and the almost complete discontinuation of commercial activities of RTVE is that the part of RTVE’s revenues hitherto generated by these commercial activities will be replaced with revenues originating from taxes specifically introduced or amended for that very purpose.
Kot je navedla Komisija, je glavna značilnost sprememb financiranja RTVE in skoraj popolnega prenehanja komercialnih dejavnosti RTVE ta, da bo del prihodkov RTVE, ki je bil doslej ustvarjen s temi komercialnimi dejavnostmi, nadomeščen s prihodki, ki izhajajo iz davkov, uvedenih posebej v ta namen oziroma spremenjenih v ta namen.
The clear references in Law 8/2009 indicate that the amount of the taxes has been set with a view to contributing a certain predetermined part to the financing of RTVE.
Jasna sklicevanja v Zakonu 8/2009 kažejo, da je bila višina davkov določena z namenom prispevanja določenega pričakovanega deleža financiranju RTVE.
This link between the financing and the proceeds from the new taxes suggests that the taxes are hypothecated to the aid granted to RTVE, in the sense that the revenue from the taxes is necessarily allocated for the financing of this aid to RTVE and has a direct impact on the amount of the aid.
Ta povezava med financiranjem in prihodki od novih davkov kaže na to, da so davki zajamčeni za pomoč RTVE, saj so prihodki od teh davkov nujno dodeljeni financiranju pomoči za RTVE in imajo neposreden vpliv na znesek pomoči.
The Court has repeatedly held that where the method of financing forms an integral part of the measure, the Commission must necessarily also take into account that method in its consideration of the aid measure [8].
Sodišče je že večkrat razsodilo, da mora Komisija tam, kjer je način financiranja sestavni del ukrepa, nujno upoštevati tudi ta način, ko presoja o ukrepu pomoči [8].
Where a charge specifically intended to finance aid proves to be contrary to other provisions of the Treaty, the Commission cannot declare the aid scheme of which the charge forms part to be compatible with the internal market.
Če se izkaže, da je dajatev, posebej namenjena financiranju pomoči, v nasprotju z drugimi določbami Pogodbe, Komisija sheme pomoči, katere sestavni del je ta dajatev, ne more razglasiti za združljivo z notranjim trgom.
Consequently, the method by which an aid measure is financed may render the entire aid scheme incompatible with the internal market.
Posledično je lahko zaradi načina financiranja ukrepa pomoči celotna shema pomoči nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The Commission therefore expressed doubts as to whether the new taxes formed an integral part of the measure.
Zato je Komisija izrazila dvome, da novi davki tvorijo sestavni del ukrepa.
If so, their compatibility with the Treaty would have to be assessed by the Commission and would impact on the general legality of the aid scheme.
Če ga tvorijo, mora Komisija oceniti njihovo združljivost s Pogodbo, imeli pa bi vpliv na splošno zakonitost sheme pomoči.
This concern seemed justified, in particular in view of the fact that the Commission has doubts as to the compatibility of the new taxes imposed on undertakings providing fixed telephony, mobile telephony and Internet access services with Directive 2002/20/EC [9].
Ta zaskrbljenost se zdi upravičena, zlasti zaradi dejstva, da Komisija dvomi v združljivost novih davkov, naloženih podjetjem, ki zagotavljajo fiksno telefonijo, mobilno telefonijo in storitve dostopa do interneta, z Direktivo 2002/20/ES [9].
Another issue about which the Commission had doubts was whether, following the reform of the financing system, Spain had established sufficient safeguards against a possible overcompensation.
Drugo vprašanje, v zvezi s katerim je Komisija izrazila dvome, je, ali je Španija po reformi sistema financiranja vzpostavila zadostne zaščitne ukrepe zoper morebitno prekomerno nadomestilo.
The abolition of advertising may impact on the costs of the broadcaster by making its programming less dependent on commercial considerations.
Odprava oglaševanja lahko vpliva na stroške izdajatelja televizijskega programa, in sicer zato, ker je njegov program manj odvisen od komercialnih zahtev.
Moreover, the system of financing RTVE should provide for an adequate procedure for assessing beforehand whether the new services of the public broadcaster RTVE comply with the material conditions of the Amsterdam Protocol [10].
Poleg tega bi moral sistem financiranja RTVE zagotoviti ustrezen postopek predhodnega ocenjevanja, ali nove storitve javne radiodifuzije RTVE izpolnjujejo bistvene pogoje Protokola Amsterdamske pogodbe [10].
The information submitted by Spain did not allow the Commission to examine whether Spain already had such a mechanism.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Španija, Komisija ni mogla preveriti, ali ima Španija že vzpostavljen tak mehanizem.
Some of them asked for their identity to be kept confidential.
Nekateri niso želeli biti imenovani.
Most complainants were arguing against the lawfulness of the new taxes, which in their view would distort competition between public and private TV, between free TV and pay TV, or between operators who only offer telecommunications services and other operators of telecommunications services who also offer audiovisual services.
Večina pritožb se je nanašala na nezakonitost novih davkov, ki bodo po njihovem mnenju izkrivljali konkurenco med javnimi in zasebnimi televizijami, neplačljivimi in plačljivimi televizijami oziroma med operaterji, ki ponujajo samo telekomunikacijske storitve, in drugimi operaterji telekomunikacijskih storitev, ki nudijo tudi avdiovizualne storitve.
They also raised doubts concerning the compatibility of the tax on electronic communications with Article 12 of the Authorisation Directive 2002/20/EC [11].
Zainteresirane stranke so izrazile tudi dvome v zvezi z združljivostjo davka na elektronske komunikacije s členom 12 Direktive o odobritvi 2002/20/ES [11].
Broadcasters and Internet service providers also questioned the compatibility of the definition of the public service remit of RTVE.
Izdajatelji televizijskega programa in ponudniki internetnih storitev so podvomili tudi v združljivost opredelitve opravljanja javne službe RTVE.
It would not be precise enough and would be too generous regarding the acquisition of broadcasting rights for special sport events or films produced by major international producers.
Opredelitev naj bi bila premalo natančna in preveč velikodušna, kar se tiče pridobivanja pravic za televizijsko razširjanje posebnih športnih dogodkov ali filmov v produkciji glavnih mednarodnih producentov.
in particular argued that no ex ante test was in place for the introduction of significant new public services of RTVE.
Zlasti TF1 je trdil, da ni vzpostavljenega predhodnega preskusa za uvedbo pomembnih novih javnih storitev RTVE.
Regarding the possible hypothecation of the tax to the aid, TV broadcasters and Internet service providers argued that the revenue from the new taxes would have a direct impact on the aid.
V zvezi z možno zajamčenostjo davka za pomoč so izdajatelji televizijskega programa in ponudniki internetnih storitev trdili, da bi prihodek od novih davkov imel neposreden vpliv na pomoč.
They were in particular concerned that raising tax revenues could lead to a compensation of RTVE beyond the level of the net costs of providing the public service.
Zlasti so izrazili zaskrbljenost, da bi zvišanje davčnih prihodkov lahko vodilo do nadomestila za RTVE, ki bi presegalo neto stroške zagotavljanja javne storitve.
Regarding the proportionality of aid, various TV and Internet operators saw a risk of overcompensation.
V zvezi s sorazmernostjo pomoči so različni televizijski in internetni operaterji videli nevarnost prekomernega nadomestila.
The budgetary planning for RTVE of EUR 1200 million, as determined by Law 8/2009, would not be based on a proper calculation of the net costs of the public service.
Proračunsko načrtovanje za RTVE v višini 1200 milijonov EUR, kot ga določa Zakon 8/2009, ne bi temeljilo na pravilnem izračunu neto stroškov javne storitve.
The current annual budgeted costs of RTVE would be an arbitrary basis.
Sedanji letni proračunski stroški RTVE bi bili samovoljna podlaga.
It would not differentiate between commercial and public service activities.
Ne bi razlikovali med komercialnimi dejavnostmi in dejavnostmi javne službe.
In particular, the planning would not take into account the cost savings that would be achieved by abolishing advertising, since the programmes would no longer need to attract large audiences.
Zlasti načrtovanje ne bi upoštevalo prihrankov stroškov, ki bi bili doseženi z ukinitvijo oglaševanja, saj za programe ne bi bilo več treba pridobivati velikega števila gledalcev.
Production, as in the case of arts programmes, for example, would thus be less costly.
Zato bi bila produkcija, kot je to pri umetniških programih, cenejša.
Others, however, expressed the fear that RTVE would spend more on high-value programmes.
Drugi pa so izrazili strah, da bi RTVE več denarja porabila za programe visoke vrednosti.
A possible overcompensation was also seen in the fact that RTVE’s losses of advertising income would be fully covered by State funds.
Morebitno prekomerno nadomestilo vidijo tudi v dejstvu, da bi izgube RTVE zaradi ukinitve oglaševanja v celoti kril državni proračun.
This compensation would be calculated on the basis of previous years while the economic crisis would have led to lower commercial revenues in 2010 and thus to lower overall revenues for RTVE.
To nadomestilo bi se izračunalo na podlagi prejšnjih let, medtem ko bi bili leta 2010 zaradi gospodarske krize komercialni prihodki nižji, s tem pa tudi celotni prihodki RTVE.
It would not be fair if, with the abolition of dual financing, RTVE were to obtain a guaranteed income, independent from the varying commercial income.
Ne bi bilo pravično, če bi RTVE z ukinitvijo dvojnega financiranja pridobila zagotovljen prihodek, neodvisen od različnega komercialnega prihodka.
Broadcasters also questioned the existence of an effective system of budgetary control to ensure that only the net costs of the public service provision are covered by public funds.
Izdajatelji televizijskega programa so tudi podvomili v obstoj učinkovitega sistema proračunskega nadzora za zagotovitev, da se z javnimi sredstvi krijejo samo neto stroški zagotavljanja javne službe.
As a preliminary point, Spain contests the fact that in the current procedure the Commission assesses the issues of proportionality and of the ex ante test for significant new services.
V uvodu Španija nasprotuje dejstvu, da v tem postopku Komisija ocenjuje vprašanja sorazmernosti in predhodnega preskusa za pomembne nove storitve.
The ‘new aid’ element would be limited to the financing reform by introducing new taxes and would not alter or affect the other elements of the existing scheme.
Element „nove pomoči“ bi bil omejen na reformo financiranja z uvedbo novih davkov in ne bi spreminjal drugih elementov obstoječe sheme ali na njih vplival.
These other elements would therefore still be existing aid and should not be assessed by the Commission in this procedure.
Ti drugi elementi bi torej bili še vedno obstoječa pomoč in jih Komisija v tem postopku ne bi smela oceniti.
Regarding the issue of hypothecation of the tax, Spain argues that the new taxes would not form an integral part of the aid and would not have a direct impact on the amount of the aid.
V zvezi z vprašanjem zajamčenosti davka Španija navaja, da novi davki ne bi tvorili sestavnega dela pomoči in ne bi imeli neposrednega vpliva na znesek pomoči.
Spain emphasised that according to Article 2(2) of Law 8/2009, read in conjunction with Article 33 of Law 17/2006, the only factor for determining the amount of public financing of RTVE is the net costs of the public service, no matter how much revenue is generated by the taxes.
Španija je poudarila, da so v skladu s členom 2(2) Zakona 8/2009, ki se bere skupaj s členom 33 Zakona 17/2006, edini dejavnik za določanje zneska javnega financiranja RTVE neto stroški javne službe, ne glede na višino prihodkov, ustvarjenih z davki.
The planned costs of the public service do not take into account the revenue generated by the taxes, but are based on the costs of this service in the previous years.
Načrtovani stroški javne službe ne upoštevajo prihodkov, ustvarjenih z davki, temveč temeljijo na stroških te službe v prejšnjih letih.
Spain confirmed that the contribution from the taxes on TV broadcasters and telecommunication operators is not just channelled to RTVE.
Španija je potrdila, da prispevek od davkov za radiotelevizije in telekomunikacijske operaterje ni zgolj usmerjen k RTVE.
Instead, the revenues from the taxes will be transferred to the general State budget (State Treasury), from where all the payments to RTVE will be made.
Prihodki od davkov bodo preneseni na splošni državni proračun (državna blagajna), iz katerega bodo izvršena vsa plačila za RTVE.
Spain has established maximum amounts for the contribution from taxes.
Španija je določila najvišje zneske za prispevek od davkov.
Any surplus revenue will be attributed to the general state budget and may thus be earmarked for other purposes.
Vsi presežni prihodki bodo dodeljeni splošnemu državnemu proračunu in se zato lahko rezervirajo za druge namene.
Furthermore, below these maximum amounts, Spain may decide what percentage of the tax it actually intends to allocate for RTVE.
Poleg tega se lahko Španija do teh najvišjih zneskov odloči, kolikšen delež davka bo dejansko dodelila RTVE.
The budgetary planning for 2010 provides for example for less than half the maximum possible contribution to be allocated to RTVE.
Proračunsko načrtovanje za leto 2010 na primer določa, da se RTVE dodeli manj kot polovica najvišjega možnega prispevka.
Spain maintains that higher- or lower-than expected revenues from the new taxes would not lead to changes in the planned amounts for the public service compensation.
Španija vztraja, da prihodki od novih davkov, ki bi bili višji oziroma nižji od pričakovanih, ne bi vodili do sprememb v načrtovanih zneskih za nadomestilo za javne storitve.
Should the revenue from the new tax sources not be sufficient to cover the financing gap left by abolishing advertising, the missing funds would be contributed from the general state budget, in accordance with Article 33 of Law 17/2006.
Če prihodki iz novih davčnih virov ne bi zadostovali za kritje finančne vrzeli, ki je posledica ukinitve oglaševanja, bi to vrzel krila sredstva iz splošnega državnega proračuna, v skladu s členom 33 Zakona 17/2006.
Any surplus revenue will be attributed to the general budget.
Vsak presežek prihodkov bo dodeljen splošnemu proračunu.
Finally, any excess in income beyond the EUR 1200 million ceiling set by Article 3(2) of Law 8/2009 would be transferred to the Public Treasury.
Poleg tega bi bil vsak presežek prihodkov nad pragom 1200 milijonov EUR, določenim s členom 3(2) Zakona 8/2009, prenesen v javno blagajno.
Therefore the planned overall funding of RTVE’s public service mission would not depend on the amount of the specific tax revenues but would in any case be assured by the general state budget.
Zato načrtovano splošno financiranje poslanstva javne storitve RTVE ne bi bilo odvisno od zneska posebnih davčnih prihodkov, temveč bi bilo v vsakem primeru zagotovljeno s splošnim državnim proračunom.
Regarding the proportionality of the aid, Spain argued that the principle of net cost coverage would be assured.
V zvezi s sorazmernostjo pomoči Španija navaja, da bi bilo načelo kritja neto stroškov zagotovljeno.
According to Article 33(1) of Law 17/2006, as amended by Law 8/2009, net costs are the only parameter determining the effective amount of the aid.
V skladu s členom 33(1) Zakona 17/2006, kakor je bil spremenjen z Zakonom 8/2009, so neto stroški edini parameter za določitev učinkovitega zneska pomoči.
According to Articles 2(2) and 8(2) of Law 8/2009, the general state budget compensates any insufficient tax revenues and any excess revenue is allocated to it, except for the possible overcompensation of 10 % of the annual budgeted costs provided for in Article 8(1) and (2).
V skladu s členoma 2(2) in 8(2) Zakona 8/2009 splošni državni proračun nadomešča morebitne nezadostne davčne prihodke, vsi presežki prihodkov pa se dodelijo državnemu proračunu, razen morebitnega prekomernega nadomestila v višini 10 % letnih proračunskih stroškov, predvidenega v členu 8(1) in (2).
With regard to the appropriateness of an annual budgetary planning of EUR 1200 million for the coming years, Spain does not consider that it has acted arbitrarily.
V zvezi s primernostjo letnega proračunskega načrtovanja v višini 1200 milijonov EUR za prihodnja leta Španija meni, da ni delovala samovoljno.
This amount is based on the annual budgeted costs incurred by RTVE in fulfilling its public service obligation.
Ta znesek temelji na letnih proračunskih stroških RTVE med opravljanjem obveznosti javne službe.
These obligations were not altered in a way that would lead us to expect lower expenses; on the contrary, complainants overlook the fact that RTVE has to invest EUR 104 million in additional productions to fill the air time freed by the disappearance of commercials.
Te obveznosti niso bile spremenjene na način, da bi bilo možno pričakovati nižje stroške; nasprotno, pritožniki so prezrli dejstvo, da mora RTVE vložiti 104 milijone EUR v dodatno produkcijo za zapolnitev programskega časa, ki se je sprostil zaradi ukinitve oglaševanja.
It would furthermore not be right to assume that, following the disappearance of advertising, RTVE would no longer need to attract large audiences and could therefore reduce production costs and offer less attractive transmissions.
Ne bi bilo pravilno domnevati, da RTVE zaradi ukinitve oglaševanja ne bi bilo treba privabljati velikega števila gledalcev ter bi zato lahko znižala stroške produkcije in ponudila manj privlačne programe.
According to its public service mission, RTVE would be obliged to maintain a distinguished and substantial presence and audience reach among the TV channels, in order to fulfil its mission effectively.
Za učinkovito izvajanje svojega poslanstva bi bila RTVE v skladu s poslanstvom javne službe dolžna ohranjati prepoznavno in pomembno prisotnost ter doseg gledalcev med televizijskimi kanali.
Finally, under Article 37 of Law 17/2006, effective ex post budgetary control would be assured by internal auditing, a review by the Government Audit Office and external auditing by a private auditing firm (KPMG).
V skladu s členom 37 Zakona 17/2006 bi bil učinkovit naknadni proračunski nadzor zagotovljen z notranjo revizijo, pregledom s strani vladnega revizorskega urada in zunanjo revizijo s strani zasebnega revizorskega podjetja (KPMG).
Furthermore, pursuant to Articles 39 and 40 of this law, the Parliament and the audiovisual authority supervise the fulfilment of the public service mission by RTVE and its annual accounts.
Poleg tega v skladu s členoma 39 in 40 tega zakona parlament in avdiovizualni svet nadzirata izpolnjevanje poslanstva javne službe RTVE in njen letni računovodski izkaz.