natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the sake of clarity it is appropriate to specify the country where the buffalo meat is originating in.
Zaradi jasnosti je primerno navesti državo porekla bizonjega mesa.
Article 2(e) of Regulation (EC) No 810/2008 allocates 1300 tonnes of meat covered by CN codes 02012090, 020130, 02022090, 020230, 02061095 and 02062991 to high quality beef cuts meeting a precise definition.
Na podlagi člena 2(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 810/2008 se 1300 ton mesa pod oznakami KN 02012090, 020130, 02022090, 020230, 02061095 in 02062991 dodeli za visokokakovostne kose govejega mesa, ki ustrezajo natančni opredelitvi.
The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedules of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania in the course of their accession to the European Union [5] approved by Council Decision 2011/767/EU [6], provides for a change in the definition of the EU tariff quota of 1300 tonnes ‘high quality beef’.
V skladu s Sporazumom v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Novo Zelandijo v skladu s členom XXIV:6 in členom XXVIII Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT) 1994 o spremembah ugodnosti na seznamih Republike Bolgarije in Romunije v okviru njunega pristopa k Evropski uniji [5], ki je bil odobren s Sklepom Sveta 2011/767/EU [6], se spremeni opredelitev pojma „visokokakovostno goveje meso“ v okviru tarifne kvote EU v višini 1300 ton.
in Article 1, paragraph 1 is amended as follows:
Člen 1(1) se spremeni:
66750 tonnes for high quality fresh, chilled or frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN codes 0201 and 0202 and for products covered by CN codes 02061095 and 02062991.
66750 ton visokokakovostnega svežega, hlajenega ali zamrznjenega mesa goveda pod oznakama KN 0201 in 0202, in proizvodi pod oznakama KN 02061095 in 02062991.
For the import period 2011/2012, the total amount is 66625 tonnes and for the import periods 2012/2013, 2013/2014, 2014/2015, the total amount is 67250 tonnes.’;
Za uvozno obdobje 2011/2012 znaša celotna količina 66625 ton, za uvozna obdobja 2012/2013, 2013/2014, 2014/2015 pa znaša celotna količina 67250 ton,“;
2250 tonnes for frozen boneless buffalo meat covered by CN code 02023090, expressed in weight of boneless meat, originating in Australia.
2250 ton zmrznjenega bizonjega mesa brez kosti pod oznako KN 02023090, izraženo v teži mesa brez kosti, s poreklom iz Avstralije.
This quota carries order number 09.4001.’;
Ta kvota ima zaporedno številko 09.4001,“;
200 tonnes for “boneless buffalo meat, fresh, chilled or frozen” covered by CN code 02013000 and CN code 02023090, expressed in weight of boneless meat, originating in Argentina.
200 ton „bizonjega mesa brez kosti, svežega, hlajenega ali zamrznjenega“ pod oznako KN 02013000 in oznako KN 02023090, izraženo v teži mesa brez kosti, s poreklom iz Argentine.
This quota carries order number 09.4004.’;
Ta kvota ima zaporedno številko 09.4004.“.
29500 tonnes of boneless beef covered by CN codes 02013000 and 02061095 and meeting the following definition:
29500 ton govejega mesa brez kosti pod oznakama KN 02013000 in 02061095, ki ustreza naslednji opredelitvi:
“Selected beef cuts obtained from steers, young steers or heifers having been exclusively fed through pasture grazing since their weaning. The steer carcasses shall be classified as ‘JJ’, ‘J’, ‘U’ or ‘U2’, young steer and heifer carcasses shall be classified as ‘AA’, ‘A’, or ‘B’ according to the official beef classification established by the Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Food in Argentina (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, PESCA y Alimentos — SAGPyA)”.
„Izbrani kosi govejega mesa od volov, teličkov ali telic, ki so bili od odstavitve vzrejeni izključno na pašnikih. Trupi volov se razvrstijo kot ‚JJ‘, ‚J‘, ‚U‘ ali ‚U2‘, trupi volov in telic se razvrstijo kot ‚AA‘, ‚A‘ ali ‚B‘ v skladu z uradnim razvrščanjem klavnih trupov govejega mesa, ki ga je določil Sekretariat za kmetijstvo, živinorejo, ribištvo in prehrano v Argentini (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentos – SAGPyA).“
However, for the import period 2011/2012 the total amount is 29375 tonnes and for the import periods 2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 it is raised to 30000 tonnes.
Vendar znaša za uvozno obdobje 2011/2012 celotna količina 29375 ton, za uvozna obdobja 2012/2013, 2013/2014 in 2014/2015 pa se poviša na 30000 ton.
The indication “High Quality Beef” may be added to the information on the label.
Podatkom na oznaki se lahko doda navedba „Goveje meso visoke kakovosti“.
This quota carries order number 09.4450.
Ta kvota ima zaporedno številko 09.4450.
in point (e), the definition is replaced by the following:
v točki (e) se opredelitev nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Selected beef cuts derived from exclusively pasture grazed steers or heifers, the carcases of which have a dressed weight of not more than 370 kilograms. The carcases shall be classified as A, L, P, T or F, be trimmed to a fat depth of P or lower and have a muscling classification of 1 or 2 according to the carcase classification system administered by the New Zealand Meat Board’;
„Izbrani kosi govejega mesa, pridobljeni iz volov ali telic, ki so bili vzrejeni izključno na pašnikih, katerih teža s kožo ob zakolu ne presega 370 kilogramov. Trupi se uvrščajo v kategorije A, L, P, T ali F, so odrezani na debelino maščobe na mestu P ali nižje ter imajo klasifikacijo mišic 1 ali 2 v skladu s sistemom klasifikacije trupov, ki ga upravlja Novozelandski odbor za meso.“.
in Article 8, paragraph 1, is replaced by the following:
V členu 8 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Imports of the quantities set out in Article 1(1)(b) and (c) and in Article 2(a) to (e) and (g) shall be subject to presentation, on release for free circulation, of import licences issued in accordance with Article 4(a) and (b) and paragraph 2 of this Article.’;
Uvoz količin, navedenih v členu 1(1)(b) in (c) ter členu 2(a) do (e) in (g), je zavezan predložitvi uvoznih dovoljenj ob sprostitvi v prosti promet v skladu s členom 4(a) in (b) ter odstavkom 2 tega člena.“.
in Article 10, the second paragraph, is replaced by the following:
V členu 10 se drugi odstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘For quantities referred to in Article 1(1)(b) and (c) and in Article 2(a) to (e) and (g) of this Regulation, the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 376/2008, Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 and Regulation (EC) No 382/2008 shall apply, save as otherwise provided for in this Regulation.’;
„Za količine iz člena 1(1)(b) in (c) ter člena 2(a) do (e) in (g) te uredbe se uporabljajo določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 376/2008, poglavje III Uredbe (ES) št. 1301/2006 in Uredba (ES) št. 382/2008, razen če ni drugače določeno v tej uredbi.“.
No later than 31 August following the end of each import tariff quota period, for the import tariff quota with the order numbers 09.4001 and 09.4004, the quantities of products, including nil returns, for which import licenses were issued in the previous import tariff quota period;’;
za uvozne tarifne kvote z zaporednima številkama 09.4001 in 09.4004 obvestijo Komisijo najpozneje 31. avgusta po koncu vsakega obdobja uvozne tarifne kvote o količinah proizvodov, tudi o ničnih zahtevkih, za katere so bila v preteklem obdobju uvozne tarifne kvote izdana uvozna dovoljenja;“;
in paragraph 3, the second subparagraph, is replaced by the following:
v odstavku 3 se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘The notifications regarding the quantities referred to in Article 1(1)(b) and (c) and in Article 2(a) to (e) and (g) of this Regulation shall be made as indicated in Annexes IV, V and VI to this Regulation.’;
„Obvestila o količinah iz člena 1(1)(b) in (c) ter člena 2(a) do (e) in (g) te uredbe se oblikujejo kot določajo priloge IV, V in VI k tej uredbi.“.
in Annex I, the definition is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I se opredelitev nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘High quality beef originating in …
„Visokokakovostno goveje meso s poreklom iz …
or Buffalo meat originating in Australia
ali Bizonje meso s poreklom iz Avstralije
or Buffalo meat originating in Argentina.’;
ali Bizonje meso s poreklom iz Argentine“.
in Annex II, the first indent is replaced by the following: ‘—
V Prilogi II se prva alinea nadomesti z naslednjim:
MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA Y FINANZAS PÚBLICAS:
„MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA Y FINANZAS PÚBLICAS:
For meat originating in Argentina:
za meso s poreklom iz Argentine:
meeting the definition in point (c) of Article 1(1)
ki ustreza opredelitvi iz točke (c) člena 1(1);
meeting the definition in Article 2(a)’;
ki ustreza opredelitvi iz člena 2(a).“.
in Annexes IV, V and VI the following order number and country of origin are added:
V prilogah IV, V in VI se dodata naslednji zaporedna številka in država porekla:
‘Argentina’.
„Argentina“.
OJ L 317, 30.11.2011, p. 3.
UL L 317, 30.11.2011, str. 3.
OJ L 317, 30.11.2011, p. 2.
UL L 317, 30.11.2011, str. 2.
OJ L 204, 11.8.2000, p. 1.’;
UL L 204, 11.8.2000, str. 1.“;
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1258/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1258/2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for nitrates in foodstuffs
o spremembi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1881/2006 glede mejnih vrednosti nitratov v živilih
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs [2] sets maximum levels for nitrates in certain leafy vegetables.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1881/2006 z dne 19. decembra 2006 o določitvi mejnih vrednosti nekaterih onesnaževal v živilih [2] določa mejne vrednosti nitratov v nekateri listnati zelenjavi.
In some cases, despite developments in good agricultural practice, the maximum levels are exceeded and therefore a temporary derogation was granted to certain Member States for the placing on the market of certain leafy vegetables, grown and intended for consumption in their territory with nitrate levels higher than the established maximum levels.
Kljub napredku dobre kmetijske prakse so mejne vrednosti občasno presežene, zato je bilo za nekatere države članice odobreno prehodno odstopanje glede dajanja na trg nekatere listnate zelenjave, gojene in namenjene za prehrano na njihovem ozemlju in v kateri vrednosti nitratov presegajo določene mejne vrednosti.
Since the application of the maximum levels of nitrates in lettuce and spinach, many investigations have been performed on the factors involved in the presence of nitrates in lettuce and spinach and on the measures to be taken to reduce the presence of nitrates in lettuce and spinach as much as possible.
Od začetka uporabe mejnih vrednosti nitratov v zeleni solati in špinači so bile opravljene številne preiskave dejavnikov, povezanih s prisotnostjo nitratov v zeleni solati in špinači, in ocene morebitnih ukrepov za čim večje zmanjšanje prisotnosti nitratov v zeleni solati in špinači.
Despite the progress achieved in the good agricultural practice to reduce the presence of nitrates in lettuce and spinach and a strict application of this good agricultural practice, it is not possible to achieve in a consistent way nitrate levels in lettuce and fresh spinach below the current maximum levels in certain regions of the Union.
Kljub doseženemu napredku dobre kmetijske prakse za zmanjšanje prisotnosti nitratov v zeleni solati in špinači ter strogemu izvajanju te dobre kmetijske prakse ni možno doseči, da bi bile vrednosti nitratov v zeleni solati in sveži špinači v nekaterih regijah Unije trajno pod veljavnimi mejnimi vrednostmi.
The reason is that the climate and in particular the light conditions are the main determinant factor in the presence of nitrates in lettuce and spinach.
Podnebje in zlasti svetlobne razmere so namreč glavni odločilni dejavnik za prisotnost nitratov v zeleni solati in špinači.
These climate conditions cannot be managed or changed by the producer.
Proizvajalec ne more vplivati na te podnebne razmere ali jih spremeniti.
To provide an up-to-date scientific basis for the longer-term strategy for managing the risk arising from nitrates in vegetables, a scientific risk assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), taking into account new information, was needed.
Za zagotovitev najnovejše znanstvene podlage za pomoč pri oblikovanju dolgoročne strategije za obvladovanje tveganja zaradi nitratov v zelenjavi je bila Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) zaprošena, da opravi znanstveno oceno tveganja.
Such assessment had to take into account any relevant considerations on risks and benefits, for example, weighing the possible negative impact of nitrate versus the possible positive effects of eating vegetables, such as antioxidant activities or other properties that might in some way counteract or provide a balance to the risks arising from nitrates and the resulting nitroso-compounds.
Pri taki oceni je bilo treba upoštevati vse ustrezne pomisleke o tveganjih in koristih, npr. primerjati morebiten negativni učinek nitratov in morebiten pozitivni učinek uživanja zelenjave, kot je antioksidativni učinek ali druge značilnosti, ki bi lahko odtehtale tveganje zaradi nitratov in posledično nitroso-spojin.
On request of the Commission, the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (the Panel) adopted on 10 April 2008 a Scientific opinion on nitrate in vegetables [3].
Odbor za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi je 10. aprila 2008 na zahtevo Komisije sprejel znanstveno mnenje o nitratih v zelenjavi [3].
The Panel compared the risk and benefits of exposure to nitrate from vegetables.
Odbor je primerjal tveganja in koristi izpostavljenosti nitratom v zelenjavi.
Overall, the estimated exposures to nitrate from vegetables are unlikely to result in appreciable health risks, therefore, the recognised beneficial effects of consumption of vegetables prevail.
Ker je majhna verjetnost, da bo pričakovana izpostavljenost nitratom v zelenjavi na splošno povzročila občutno tveganje za zdravje, prevladajo priznani koristni učinki uživanja zelenjave.
The Panel recognised that there are occasional circumstances (e.g. unfavourable local/home production conditions) for vegetables which constitute a large part of the diet, or individuals with a diet high in vegetables such as rucola which need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Odbor je priznal, da je treba v nekaterih primerih (npr. neugodne lokalne/domače proizvodne razmere), ko zelenjava pomeni velik del prehrane, ali pri posameznikih s prehrano, bogato z zelenjavo, kot je rukola, opraviti oceno za vsak primer posebej.
Following discussion on appropriate measures and concerns expressed as regards possible risks for infants and young children following acute dietary intake exposure, the Commission asked EFSA for a complementary scientific statement on nitrates in vegetables, whereby the possible risks for infants and young children related to the presence of nitrates in fresh vegetables are assessed in more detail, also considering the acute dietary intake, taking into account recent occurrence data on the presence of nitrates in vegetables, more detailed consumption data of vegetables by infants and young children and the possibility of the establishment of slightly higher than the current maximum levels for nitrates in leafy vegetables.
Po razpravi o ustreznih ukrepih in izraženih pomislekih o morebitnem tveganju za dojenčke in majhne otroke po akutnem uživanju je Komisija zaprosila Agencijo za dopolnilno znanstveno izjavo o nitratih v zelenjavi, s poudarkom na morebitnem tveganju za dojenčke in majhne otroke zaradi prisotnosti nitratov v sveži zelenjavi ob upoštevanju akutnega uživanja, podatkov o nedavnem pojavu nitratov v zelenjavi, bolj podrobnih podatkov o uživanju zelenjave pri dojenčkih in majhnih otrocih ter možnosti določitve mejnih vrednosti nitratov v zelenjavi, nekoliko višjih od veljavnih vrednosti.
The Panel adopted on 1 December 2010 a Statement on possible public health risks for infants and young children from the presence of nitrates in leafy vegetables [4].
Odbor je 1. decembra 2010 sprejel izjavo o morebitnem javnozdravstvenem tveganju za dojenčke in majhne otroke zaradi prisotnosti nitratov v listnati zelenjavi [4].
In that statement the Panel concluded that exposure to nitrate at the current or envisaged maximum levels in spinach cooked from fresh spinach is unlikely to be a health concern, although a risk for some infants eating more than one spinach meal per day cannot be excluded.
V navedeni izjavi je Odbor sklenil, da izpostavljenost nitratom pri veljavnih ali predvidenih mejnih vrednosti v špinači, skuhani iz sveže špinače, verjetno ne bo pomenilo zdravstvenega problema, čeprav ni mogoče izključiti, da bodo nekateri dojenčki užili več kot en špinačni obrok na dan.
EFSA noted that it did not take into account possible changes of the nitrate content due to processing of the food commodities, such as washing, peeling and/or cooking, as this could not be considered due to lack of representative data.
Agencija je navedla, da ni upoštevala morebitnih sprememb vsebnosti nitratov zaradi predelave živil, kot je pranje, lupljenje in/ali kuhanje, saj jih ni bilo mogoče obravnavati zaradi pomanjkanja reprezentativnih podatkov.
The non-consideration of the quantitative impact of food processing on nitrate levels may consequently lead to an overestimation of the exposure.
Neupoštevanje vpliva predelave živil na vsebnost nitratov bi lahko povzročilo prekomerno oceno izpostavljenosti.
It was furthermore concluded that levels of nitrate in lettuce are not a health concern for children.
Nadalje je bilo sklenjeno, da vrednosti nitratov v zeleni solati ne predstavljajo zdravstvenega problema za otroke.
Enforcing the current maximum levels for nitrate in lettuce and spinach, or envisaged maximum levels at 500 mg/kg higher than the current maximum levels, would have a minor impact.
Izvrševanje veljavnih mejnih vrednosti za nitrate v zeleni solati in špinači ali predvidenih mejnih vrednosti za 500 mg/kg več od veljavnih mejnih vrednosti bi imelo le majhen vpliv.
In order to provide legal security for the producer in all regions of the European Union which applies strictly the good agricultural practices to reduce the presence of nitrates in spinach and lettuce as much as possible, it is therefore appropriate to slightly increase the maximum level for nitrates in fresh spinach and lettuce without endangering public health.
Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti proizvajalcev v vseh regijah Evropske unije, ki strogo izvajajo dobre kmetijske prakse za čim večje zmanjšanje prisotnosti nitratov v špinači in zeleni solati, je zato primerno nekoliko zvišati mejne vrednosti nitratov v sveži špinači in zeleni solati, ne da bi se s tem ogrozilo javno zdravje.
Given the sometimes very high levels of nitrates found in rucola, it is appropriate to set a maximum level for rucola.
Ker so občasno ugotovljene zelo visoke vrednosti nitratov v rukoli, je primerno določiti mejno vrednost za rukolo.
The maximum level for rucola should be reviewed in 2 years in view of a reduction of the levels after having identified the factors involved in the presence of nitrate in rucola and the full implementation of good agricultural practice in rucola to minimise the nitrate content.
Mejno vrednost za rukolo je treba pregledati po dveh letih zaradi morebitnega znižanja vrednosti po opredelitvi dejavnikov, povezanih s prisotnostjo nitratov v rukoli, in popolnega izvajanja dobre kmetijske prakse za zmanjšanje vsebnosti nitratov v rukoli.
Given that EFSA has been mandated by the Commission to compile all occurrence data on contaminants, including nitrates, in food into one database, it is appropriate to communicate the results directly to EFSA.
Ker je Komisija pooblastilo Agencijo, da zbere vse podatke o pojavljanju onesnaževal, vključno z nitrati, v živilih v eno zbirko podatkov, je primerno, da se podatki sporočajo neposredno Agenciji.
in Article 7, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are deleted;
V členu 7 se črtajo odstavki 1, 2 in 3.
in Article 9, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Odstavek 1 člena 9 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States shall monitor nitrate levels in vegetables which may contain significant levels, in particular green leaf vegetables, and communicate the result to EFSA on a regular basis.’;
Države članice spremljajo vsebnost nitratov v zelenjavi, ki lahko vsebuje visoke vrednosti, zlasti v zelenolistnati zelenjavi, in redno sporočajo rezultate Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane.“
in the Annex, Section 1: Nitrate is replaced by the Section in the Annex to this Regulation.
V Prilogi se Oddelek 1: Nitrati nadomesti z oddelkom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
It shall apply from the date of its entry into force.
Uporablja se od dneva začetka veljavnosti.
However, the maximum levels for rucola provided for in point 1.5 of the Annex shall apply from 1 April 2012.
Vendar se mejne vrednosti za rukolo iz točke 1.5 Priloge uporabljajo od 1. aprila 2012.
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food chain on a request from the European Commission to perform a scientific risk assessment on nitrate in vegetables, EFSA Journal (2008), Journal No 689, p. 1. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/689.pdf
Mnenje Znanstvenega odbora za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi na zahtevo Evropske komisije za znanstveno oceno tveganja nitratov v zelenjavi, EFSA Journal (2008); 689, str. 1. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/689.pdf
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Scientific Opinion on possible health risks for infants and young children from the presence of nitrates in leafy vegetables.
Odbor EFSA za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi (CONTAM); Znanstveno mnenje o morebitnem zdravstvenem tveganju za dojenčke in majhne otroke zaradi prisotnosti nitratov v listnati zelenjavi.
Nitrate
Nitrati
Fresh spinach (Spinacia oleracea) (2)
sveža špinača (Spinacia oleracea) (2)
Fresh Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) (protected and open-grown lettuce) excluding lettuce listed in point 1.4
sveža zelena solata (Lactuca sativa L.) (gojena v rastlinjaku in gojena na prostem), razen zelene solate iz točke 1.4
“Iceberg” type lettuce
vrsta zelene solate ‚ledenka‘
Rucola (Eruca sativa, Diplotaxis sp., Brassica tenuifolia, Sisymbrium tenuifolium)
rukola (Eruca sativa, Diplotaxis sp, Brassica tenuifolia, Sisymbrium tenuifolium)
Processed cereal-based foods and baby foods for infants and young children (3) (4)
žitne kašice ter otroška hrana za dojenčke in majhne otroke (3) (4)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1259/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1259/2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for dioxins, dioxin-like PCBs and non dioxin-like PCBs in foodstuffs
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1881/2006 v zvezi z mejnimi vrednostmi dioksinov, dioksinom podobnih PCB-jev in dioksinom nepodobnih PCB-jev v živilih
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs [2] sets maximum levels for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in a range of foodstuffs.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1881/2006 z dne 19. decembra 2006 o določitvi mejnih vrednosti nekaterih onesnaževal v živilih [2] določa mejne vrednosti dioksinov in dioksinom podobnih PCB-jev v raznih živilih.
Dioxins belong to a group of 75 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (PCDD) congeners and 135 polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF) congeners, of which 17 are of toxicological concern.
Dioksini spadajo v skupino 75 kongenerjev polikloriranega dibenzo-p-dioksina (PCDD) in 135 kongenerjev polikloriranega dibenzofurana (PCDF), od katerih je 17 problematičnih s toksikološkega vidika.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a group of 209 different congeners which can be divided into two groups according to their toxicological properties: 12 congeners exhibit toxicological properties similar to dioxins and are therefore often referred to as ‘dioxin-like PCBs’ (DL-PCB).
Poliklorirani bifenili (PCB) so skupina 209 različnih kongenerjev, ki jih lahko razdelimo na dve skupini glede na njihove toksikološke lastnosti: 12 kongenerjev kaže podobne toksikološke lastnosti kot dioksini in se zato pogosto imenujejo „dioksinom podobni PCB-ji“.