natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Social services have fundamentally distinct features that are reflected in sector-specific legislation, partially at Union level and partially at national level.
Socialne storitve imajo bistveno drugačne značilnosti, kar se odraža tudi v zakonodaji tega sektorja, deloma na ravni Unije in deloma na nacionalni ravni.
Social services include, on the one hand, services for particularly disadvantaged or low income persons as well as services for persons and families in need of assistance in carrying out routine, everyday tasks and, on the other hand, services for all people who have a special need for assistance, support, protection or encouragement in a specific life phase.
Socialne storitve zajemajo na eni strani storitve za posebej prikrajšane osebe ali osebe z nizkimi dohodki ter storitve za osebe in družine, ki potrebujejo pomoč pri opravljanju vsakodnevnih rutinskih opravil, na drugi strani pa storitve za vse osebe s posebnimi potrebami do pomoči, podpore, varstva ali spodbude v določenem življenjskem obdobju.
Social services cover, inter alia, services for children and youth, assistance services for families, single parents and older persons, and services for migrants.
Socialne storitve med drugim zajemajo tudi storitve za otroke in mlade, storitve pomoči družinam, starše samohranilce in starejše osebe ter storitve za migrante.
Social services cover both short-term and long-term care services, for instance services provided by home care services or provided in assisted living facilities and residential homes or housing (‘nursing homes’).
Socialne storitve zajemajo tako storitve kratkotrajne kot dolgotrajne nege, na primer storitve opravljene s strani služb za oskrbo na domu, ali opravljene v okviru centrov, ki zagotavljajo pogoje za samostojno življenje, in stanovanjskih domovih ali namestitvenih objektih („domovi za bolniško nego“).
Social services include not only those provided by the State at a national, regional or local level by providers mandated by the State or by charities recognised by the State but also those provided by private operators.
Socialne storitve ne zajemajo le storitev, ki jih zagotavlja država na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni, prek ponudnikov, pooblaščenih s strani države, ali dobrodelnih organizacij, ki jih država priznava, temveč tudi storitve zasebnih ponudnikov.
The provisions of this Directive are not appropriate to social services which should be therefore excluded from its scope.
Določbe te direktive niso ustrezne za socialne storitve, ki bi zato morale biti izključene iz njenega področja uporabe.
Healthcare requires special regulations because of its technical complexity, its importance as a service of general interest as well as its extensive public funding.
Zdravstveno varstvo zahteva posebno ureditev zaradi tehnične zapletenosti, pomena, ki ga ima kot storitev splošnega interesa in zaradi obsežnega financiranja iz javnih sredstev.
Healthcare is defined in Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare [9] as ‘health services provided by health professionals to patients to assess, maintain or restore their state of health, including the prescription, dispensation and provision of medicinal products and medical devices’.
Zdravstveno varstvo je v Direktivi 2011/24/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2011 o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov pri čezmejnem zdravstvenem varstvu [9] opredeljeno kot „zdravstvene storitve, ki jih za paciente opravljajo zdravstveni delavci, da bi ocenili, ohranili ali obnovili njihovo zdravstveno stanje, vključno z izdajo in zagotovitvijo zdravil in medicinskih pripomočkov ter izdajanjem receptov zanje“.
Health professional is defined in that Directive as a doctor of medicine, a nurse responsible for general care, a dental practitioner, a midwife or a pharmacist within the meaning of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications [10] or another professional exercising activities in the healthcare sector which are restricted to a regulated profession as defined in point (a) of Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/36/EC, or a person considered to be a health professional according to the legislation of the Member State of treatment.
Zdravstveni delavec je v navedeni direktivi opredeljen kot zdravnik, medicinski tehnik, pristojen za splošno oskrbo, zobozdravnik, babica ali farmacevt v smislu Direktive 2005/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij [10] ali drug strokovnjak, ki izvaja dejavnosti v sektorju zdravstvenega varstva, omejene na regulirane poklice, kakor je določeno v točki (a) člena 3(1) Direktive 2005/36/ES, ali oseba, ki velja za zdravstvenega delavca v skladu z zakonodajo države članice zdravljenja.
The provisions of this Directive are not appropriate to healthcare which should be therefore excluded from its scope.
Določbe te direktive niso ustrezne za področje zdravstvenega varstva, zato bi bilo treba ta sektor izključiti iz njenega področja uporabe.
Gambling should be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Igre na srečo bi morale biti izključene iz področja uporabe te direktive.
Gambling activities are those which involve wagering at stake with pecuniary value in games of chance, including lotteries, gambling in casinos and betting transactions.
Dejavnosti iger na srečo so tiste, pri katerih gre za denarne vložke, vključno z loterijo, igralništvom v kazinojih in stavami.
Member States should be able to adopt other, including more stringent, consumer protection measures in relation to such activities.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti dovoljeno, da v zvezi s temi dejavnostmi sprejmejo druge, tudi strožje ukrepe za varstvo potrošnikov.
The existing Union legislation, inter alia, relating to consumer financial services, package travel and timeshare contains numerous rules on consumer protection.
Obstoječa zakonodaja Unije, med drugim o finančnih storitvah, paketnih potovanjih in uporabi nepremičnin na podlagi časovnega zakupa vsebuje številna pravila o varstvu potrošnikov.
For this reason, this Directive should not apply to contracts in those areas.
Ta direktiva se zato ne bi smela uporabljati za pogodbe na teh področjih.
With regard to financial services, Member States should be encouraged to draw inspiration from existing Union legislation in that area when legislating in areas not regulated at Union level, in such a way that a level playing field for all consumers and all contracts relating to financial services is ensured.
V zvezi s finančnimi storitvami bi morali spodbujati države članice, da se pri sprejemanju zakonov na področjih, ki niso urejena na ravni Unije, zgledujejo po obstoječi zakonodaji Unije na tem področju tako, da se zagotovijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji za vse potrošnike in vse pogodbe v zvezi s finančnimi storitvami.
The trader should be obliged to inform the consumer in advance of any arrangement resulting in the consumer paying a deposit to the trader, including an arrangement whereby an amount is blocked on the consumer’s credit or debit card.
Trgovec bi moral biti zavezan, da potrošnika vnaprej obvesti o morebitni ureditvi, zaradi katere mora potrošnik trgovcu plačati polog, vključno z ureditvijo, po kateri se blokira neki znesek na potrošnikovi kreditni ali bančni plačilni kartici.
The trader should give the consumer clear and comprehensible information before the consumer is bound by a distance or off-premises contract, a contract other than a distance or an off-premises contract, or any corresponding offer.
Trgovec bi moral potrošniku dati jasne in razumljive informacije, preden potrošnika zavezuje pogodba, sklenjena na daljavo ali pogodba, sklenjena zunaj poslovnih prostorov, pogodba, ki ni pogodba, sklenjena na daljavo ali zunaj poslovnih prostorov, ali vsaka druga ustrezna ponudba.
In providing that information, the trader should take into account the specific needs of consumers who are particularly vulnerable because of their mental, physical or psychological infirmity, age or credulity in a way which the trader could reasonably be expected to foresee.
Pri zagotavljanju teh informacij bi moral trgovec upoštevati posebne potrebe potrošnikov, ki so posebej ranljivi zaradi svoje duševne, fizične ali psihološke hibe, starosti ali lahkovernosti na način, ki ga trgovec lahko razumno predvidi.
However, taking into account such specific needs should not lead to different levels of consumer protection.
Vendar upoštevanje takih posebnih potreb ne bi smelo privesti do različnih ravni varstva potrošnikov.
The information to be provided by the trader to the consumer should be mandatory and should not be altered.
Informacije, ki jih potrošniku zagotovi trgovec, bi morale biti obvezne in se jih ne bi smelo spreminjati.
Nevertheless, the contracting parties should be able to expressly agree to change the content of the contract subsequently concluded, for instance the arrangements for delivery.
Kljub temu bi morali imeti pogodbeni stranki možnost, da se izrecno dogovorita o spremembi vsebine naknadno sklenjene pogodbe, na primer glede dostave.
In the case of distance contracts, the information requirements should be adapted to take into account the technical constraints of certain media, such as the restrictions on the number of characters on certain mobile telephone screens or the time constraint on television sales spots.
Pri pogodbah, sklenjenih na daljavo, bi bilo treba zahteve po informiranju prilagoditi tako, da upoštevajo tehnične omejitve nekaterih medijev, kot so omejitev števila znakov na zaslonih nekaterih mobilnih telefonov ali časovno omejitev prodajnih oglasov na televiziji.
In such cases the trader should comply with a minimum set of information requirements and refer the consumer to another source of information, for instance by providing a toll free telephone number or a hypertext link to a webpage of the trader where the relevant information is directly available and easily accessible.
V teh primerih mora trgovec izpolnjevati minimalni sklop zahtev po informacijah in potrošnika napotiti k drugemu viru informacij, na primer z zagotovitvijo brezplačne telefonske številke ali povezave na spletno stran trgovca, na kateri so ustrezne informacije neposredno in preprosto dostopne.
As to the requirement to inform the consumer of the cost of returning goods which by their nature cannot normally be returned by post, it will be considered to have been met, for example, if the trader specifies one carrier (for instance the one he assigned for the delivery of the good) and one price concerning the cost of returning the goods.
Kar zadeva zahtevo o obveščanju potrošnika o stroških vračila blaga, ki ga zaradi njegove narave ni mogoče vrniti na običajen način po pošti, se bo štelo, da je izpolnjena, če na primer trgovec določi enega prevoznika (na primer tistega, ki ga je izbral za dostavo blaga) in eno ceno za vračilo stroškov blaga.
Where the cost of returning the goods cannot reasonably be calculated in advance by the trader, for example because the trader does not offer to arrange for the return of the goods himself, the trader should provide a statement that such a cost will be payable, and that this cost may be high, along with a reasonable estimation of the maximum cost, which could be based on the cost of delivery to the consumer.
Kadar trgovec ne more vnaprej na razumen način izračunati stroškov vračila blaga, na primer, ker trgovec sam ne ponuja organizacije vračila blaga, bi moral trgovec podati izjavo, da bo te stroške treba plačati in da bodo morda visoki, skupaj z razumno oceno najvišjih stroškov, ki bi lahko temeljila na stroških dostave potrošniku.
Since in the case of distance sales, the consumer is not able to see the goods before concluding the contract, he should have a right of withdrawal.
Potrošnik pri prodaji na daljavo ne more videti blaga pred sklenitvijo pogodbe, zato bi moral imeti pravico do odstopa od pogodbe.
For the same reason, the consumer should be allowed to test and inspect the goods he has bought to the extent necessary to establish the nature, characteristics and the functioning of the goods.
Iz istega razloga bi moral imeti potrošnik možnost, da kolikor je potrebno preskusi in pregleda blago, ki ga je kupil, da se prepriča o naravi, lastnostih in delovanju blaga.
Concerning off-premises contracts, the consumer should have the right of withdrawal because of the potential surprise element and/or psychological pressure.
V primeru pogodb, sklenjenih zunaj poslovnih prostorov, bi potrošnik moral imeti pravico do odstopa od pogodbe zaradi morebitnega elementa presenečenja in/ali psihološkega pritiska.
Withdrawal from the contract should terminate the obligation of the contracting parties to perform the contract.
Z odstopom od pogodbe bi morala prenehati veljati obveznost pogodbenih strank glede izpolnitve pogodbe.
Trading websites should indicate clearly and legibly at the latest at the beginning of the ordering process whether any delivery restrictions apply and which means of payment are accepted.
Spletna mesta bi morala pri poslovanju najpozneje na začetku postopka naročanja jasno in čitljivo navesti, ali obstajajo kakršne koli omejitve za dostavo in katere oblike plačila se sprejemajo.
It is important to ensure for distance contracts concluded through websites that the consumer is able to fully read and understand the main elements of the contract before placing his order.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da lahko pri pogodbah, sklenjenih na daljavo, in ki so sklenjene prek spletne strani, potrošnik v celoti prebere in razume glavne elemente pogodbe, preden odda naročilo.
To that end, provision should be made in this Directive for those elements to be displayed in the close vicinity of the confirmation requested for placing the order.
V ta namen bi morala imeti ta direktiva določbo, po kateri bi morali ti elementi biti vidni blizu mesta potrditve oddaje naročila.
It is also important to ensure that, in such situations, the consumer is able to determine the moment at which he assumes the obligation to pay the trader.
Treba je tudi zagotoviti, da v teh primerih potrošnik lahko ugotovi, v katerem trenutku prevzame obveznost plačila trgovcu.
Therefore, the consumer’s attention should specifically be drawn, through an unambiguous formulation, to the fact that placing the order entails the obligation to pay the trader.
Zato bi bilo treba potrošnikovo pozornost z nedvoumno formulacijo usmeriti predvsem k dejstvu, da oddaja naročila zajema obveznost plačila trgovcu.
The current varying lengths of the withdrawal periods both between the Member States and for distance and off-premises contracts cause legal uncertainty and compliance costs.
Dolžina sedanjih odstopnih rokov se razlikuje med državami članicami ter med pogodbami, sklenjenimi na daljavo, in pogodbami, sklenjenimi zunaj poslovnih prostorov, kar povzroča pravno negotovost in stroške usklajevanja.
The same withdrawal period should apply to all distance and off-premises contracts.
Za vse pogodbe, sklenjene na daljavo, in pogodbe, sklenjene zunaj poslovnih prostorov, bi bilo treba uporabljati enak odstopni rok.
In the case of service contracts, the withdrawal period should expire after 14 days from the conclusion of the contract.
V primeru pogodb o opravljanju storitev bi se moral odstopni rok izteči 14 dni po sklenitvi pogodbe.
In the case of sales contracts, the withdrawal period should expire after 14 days from the day on which the consumer or a third party other than the carrier and indicated by the consumer, acquires physical possession of the goods.
V primeru prodajnih pogodb bi se moral odstopni rok izteči 14 dni po dnevu, ko potrošnik ali tretja stran, ki ni ponudnik poštnih storitev in ga imenuje potrošnik, pridobi fizično posest na blagu.
In addition the consumer should be able to exercise the right to withdraw before acquiring physical possession of the goods.
Poleg tega bi moral potrošnik imeti možnost odstopa od pogodbe pred pridobitvijo fizične posesti na blagu.
Where multiple goods are ordered by the consumer in one order but are delivered separately, the withdrawal period should expire after 14 days from the day on which the consumer acquires physical possession of the last good.
Če potrošnik več kosov blaga naroči z enkratnim naročilom, vendar se blago dostavi ločeno, bi se odstopni rok moral izteči 14 dni od dneva, ko potrošnik pridobi fizično materialno posest zadnjega kosa blaga.
Where goods are delivered in multiple lots or pieces, the withdrawal period should expire after 14 days from the day on which the consumer acquires the physical possession of the last lot or piece.
Kadar se blago dostavi v več pošiljkah ali kosih, bi se moral odstopni rok izteči 14 dni od dneva, ko potrošnik pridobi fizično posest na zadnji pošiljki ali kosu.
In order to ensure legal certainty, it is appropriate that Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits [11] should apply to the calculation of the periods contained in this Directive.
Da se zagotovi pravna varnost, je primerno, da bi se Uredba Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in iztekov rokov [11] uporabljala pri izračunu rokov iz te direktive.
Therefore, all periods contained in this Directive should be understood to be expressed in calendar days.
Zato bi bilo treba šteti, da so vsi roki v tej direktivi izraženi v koledarskih dnevih.
Where a period expressed in days is to be calculated from the moment at which an event occurs or an action takes place, the day during which that event occurs or that action takes place should not be considered as falling within the period in question.
Če se šteje, da rok, izražen v dnevih, začne teči v trenutku, ko se zgodi neki dogodek ali se izvrši neko dejanje, se dan, ko se ta dogodek zgodi ali ko se to dejanje izvrši, pri računanju zadevnega roka ne bi smel upoštevati.
The provisions relating to the right of withdrawal should be without prejudice to the Member States’ laws and regulations governing the termination or unenforceability of a contract or the possibility for the consumer to fulfil his contractual obligations before the time determined in the contract.
Določbe o pravici do odstopa ne bi smele posegati v zakonodajo in predpise držav članic v zvezi z odpovedjo ali neizvršljivostjo pogodbe niti v potrošnikovo pravico, da svoje pogodbene obveznosti izpolni pred rokom, določenim v pogodbi.
If the trader has not adequately informed the consumer prior to the conclusion of a distance or off-premises contract, the withdrawal period should be extended.
Če pred sklenitvijo pogodbe, sklenjene na daljavo ali zunaj poslovnih prostorov, potrošnik od trgovca ni prejel ustreznih informacij, bi bilo treba odstopni rok podaljšati.
However, in order to ensure legal certainty as regards the length of the withdrawal period, a 12-month limitation period should be introduced.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba zaradi zagotavljanja pravne varnosti, kar zadeva dolžino odstopnega roka, uvesti dvanajstmesečni zastaralni rok.
Differences in the ways in which the right of withdrawal is exercised in the Member States have caused costs for traders selling cross-border.
Različni načini uveljavljanja pravice do odstopa od pogodbe v državah članicah povzročajo stroške trgovcem, ki se ukvarjajo s čezmejno prodajo.
The introduction of a harmonised model withdrawal form that the consumer may use should simplify the withdrawal process and bring legal certainty.
Z uvedbo usklajenega vzorčnega odstopnega obrazca, ki ga lahko uporabi potrošnik, bi morali poenostaviti odstopni postopek in zagotoviti pravno varnost.
For these reasons, Member States should refrain from adding any presentational requirements to the Union-wide model form relating for example to the font size.
Zato bi se morale države članice vzdržati dodajanja kakršnih koli predstavitvenih zahtev vzorčnemu obrazcu Unije, na primer glede velikosti pisave.
However, the consumer should remain free to withdraw in his own words, provided that his statement setting out his decision to withdraw from the contract to the trader is unequivocal.
Potrošnik bi moral ohraniti možnost, da prostovoljno odstopi od pogodbe na podlagi lastne izjave trgovcu, pod pogojem, da je izjava, iz katere izhaja odločitev o odstopu od pogodbe, nedvoumna.
A letter, a telephone call or returning the goods with a clear statement could meet this requirement, but the burden of proof of having withdrawn within the time limits fixed in the Directive should be on the consumer.
Tej zahtevi bi lahko ustrezalo pismo, telefonski klic ali vračilo blaga z jasno izjavo, vendar pa bi dokazno breme glede odstopa od pogodbe v rokih, določenih s to direktivo, moralo biti na strani potrošnika.
For this reason, it is in the interest of the consumer to make use of a durable medium when communicating his withdrawal to the trader.
Prav zato je v interesu potrošnika, da trgovcu sporoči odstop od pogodbe na trajnem nosilcu podatkov.
As experience shows that many consumers and traders prefer to communicate via the trader’s website, there should be a possibility for the trader to give the consumer the option of filling in a web-based withdrawal form.
Izkušnje kažejo, da številni potrošniki in trgovci raje komunicirajo prek spletne strani trgovca, zato bi moral imeti trgovec možnost, da potrošniku da na voljo možnost izpolnjevanja odstopnega obrazca na spletu.
In this case the trader should provide an acknowledgement of receipt for instance by e-mail without delay.
V tem primeru mora trgovec na primer po e-pošti nemudoma poslati potrdilo o prejemu.
In the event that the consumer withdraws from the contract, the trader should reimburse all payments received from the consumer, including those covering the expenses borne by the trader to deliver goods to the consumer.
V primeru odstopa od pogodbe bi moral trgovec povrniti vsa plačila, ki jih je prejel od potrošnika, tudi tista za kritje izdatkov, ki jih ima trgovec v zvezi z dostavo blaga potrošniku.
The reimbursement should not be made by voucher unless the consumer has used vouchers for the initial transaction or has expressly accepted them.
Povračilo se ne bi smelo izplačati v obliki bona, razen če je potrošnik že prvotno transakcijo izvedel z boni ali jih je izrecno sprejel.
If the consumer expressly chooses a certain type of delivery (for instance 24-hour express delivery), although the trader had offered a common and generally acceptable type of delivery which would have incurred lower delivery costs, the consumer should bear the difference in costs between these two types of delivery.
Če potrošnik izrecno izbere določeno vrsto dostave (na primer hitro dostavo v 24 urah), čeprav je trgovec ponudil običajen in splošno sprejemljiv način dostave, ki bi povzročil nižje stroške, bi moral potrošnik plačati razliko v stroških med tema dvema načinoma dostave.
Some consumers exercise their right of withdrawal after having used the goods to an extent more than necessary to establish the nature, characteristics and the functioning of the goods.
Nekateri potrošniki uveljavljajo svojo pravico do odstopa od pogodbe po tem, ko so uporabljali blago več, kot je potrebno za ugotavljanje narave, lastnosti in delovanja blaga.
In this case the consumer should not lose the right to withdraw but should be liable for any diminished value of the goods.
V takem primeru potrošnik ne bi smel izgubiti pravice do odstopa od pogodbe, moral pa bi biti odgovoren za kakršno koli zmanjšano vrednost blaga.
In order to establish the nature, characteristics and functioning of the goods, the consumer should only handle and inspect them in the same manner as he would be allowed to do in a shop.
Za namen ugotavljanja narave, lastnosti in delovanja blaga bi potrošnik moral z njim ravnati in ga pregledati samo na način, ki je dovoljen tudi v trgovini.
For example, the consumer should only try on a garment and should not be allowed to wear it.
Na primer, potrošnik bi lahko samo pomeril oblačilo, ne bi ga pa smel nositi.