natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 22 o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of 6 months after the Council has decided on this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
Ker ta sklep nadgrajuje schengenski pravni red, se Danska v skladu s členom 4 navedenega protokola v šestih mesecih od dne, ko Svet sprejme ta sklep, odloči, ali bo ta sklep prenesla v svoje nacionalno pravo.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [6] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [7].
Ta sklep predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško nadaljnji razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [6], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma [7].
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [8] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [9].
Ta sklep predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [8], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [9].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [10] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/349/EU [11].
Ta sklep predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [10], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2011/349/EU [11].
As regards Cyprus, this Decision constitutes an act building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Ta sklep predstavlja za Ciper akt, ki nadgrajuje ali je kako drugače povezan s schengenskim pravnim redom v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
This Decision constitutes an act building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession.
Ta sklep predstavlja akt, ki nadgrajuje ali je kako drugače povezan s schengenskim pravnim redom v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005.
In accordance with Article 58(4) of Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code) [12], until the date referred to in Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 concerning the Visa Information System (VIS) and the exchange of data between Member States on short-stay visas (VIS Regulation) [13], the procedure set out in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 789/2001 should continue to apply, if necessary, for the amendments of certain parts of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications),
V skladu s členom 58(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 810/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o vizumskem zakoniku Skupnosti (Vizumski zakonik) [12] bi se moral do datuma iz člena 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 767/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o vizumskem informacijskem sistemu (VIS) in izmenjavi podatkov med državami članicami o vizumih za kratkoročno prebivanje (Uredba VIS) [13] po potrebi še naprej uporabljati postopek iz člena 1(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 789/2001, in sicer za spremembe določenih delov schengenskega posvetovalnega omrežja (tehnične specifikacije) –
Parts 1, 2 and 3 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) are hereby amended as set out in the Annexes I, II and III.
Deli 1, 2 in 3 schengenskega posvetovalnega omrežja (tehnične specifikacije) se spremenijo, kakor je ustrezno navedeno v prilogah I, II in III.
This Decision shall enter into force on 9 June 2011.
Ta sklep začne veljati 9. junija 2011.
It shall apply from 10 July 2011.
Uporablja se od 10. julija 2011.
OJ L 160, 18.6.2011, p. 3.
UL L 160, 18.6.2011, str. 3.
OJ L 160, 18.6.2011, p. 1.
UL L 160, 18.6.2011, str. 1.
Point 1.3 of Part 1 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is replaced by the following:
Točka 1.3 dela 1 schengenskega posvetovalnega omrežja (tehnične specifikacije) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point 2.2.1 of Part 2 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is replaced by the following:
Točka 2.2.1 dela 2 schengenskega posvetovalnega omrežja (tehnične specifikacije) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The last paragraph of point 3.2.5 of Part 3 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is deleted.
Zadnji odstavek točke 3.2.5 dela 3 schengenskega posvetovalnega omrežja (tehnične specifikacije) se črta.
An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Albert MORENO HUMET,
Zaradi izteka mandata Alberta MORENA HUMETA se je sprostilo mesto nadomestnega člana Odbora regij –
The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as an alternate member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:
Za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2015, se za nadomestnega člana Odbora regij imenuje:
An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Johanna MIKL-LEITNER,
Zaradi izteka mandata Johanne MIKL-LEITNER se je sprostilo mesto nadomestnega člana Odbora regij –
The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as alternate member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:
Za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2015, se za nadomestno članico Odbora regij imenuje:
of 24 June 2011
z dne 24. junija 2011
exempting exploration for oil and gas and exploitation of oil in Italy from the application of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors
o izvzetju iskanja nafte in plina ter izkoriščanja nafte v Italiji iz uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev
On 23 March 2011 the Italian Petroleum and Mining Industry Association – Assomineraria transmitted a request pursuant to Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC to the Commission by e-mail.
Italijansko združenje naftne in rudarske industrije – Assomineraria je 23. marca 2011 Komisiji po elektronski pošti poslalo prošnjo v skladu s členom 30(5) Direktive 2004/17/ES.
In line with previous Commission Merger Decisions [2], two distinct activities have been described in the request, namely:
V skladu s predhodnimi odločbami Komisije o združitvah [2] sta bili v prošnji navedeni dve ločeni dejavnosti, in sicer:
exploration for oil and natural gas; and
iskanje nafte in zemeljskega plina ter
production of oil.
proizvodnja nafte.
In accordance with the abovementioned Commission Decisions, ‘production’ will for the purposes of this Decision be taken to include also ‘development’, i.e. the setting up of adequate infrastructure for future production (oil platforms, pipelines, terminals, etc.).
V skladu z navedenimi odločbami Komisije pomeni „proizvodnja“ za namene tega sklepa tudi „urejanje nahajališč“, tj. vzpostavitev ustrezne infrastrukture za prihodnjo proizvodnjo (naftne ploščadi, naftovodi, naftni terminali itd.).
Furthermore, established Commission practice also found that ‘the development, production and sales of crude oil’ constitutes ‘one relevant product market’ [3].
Poleg tega uveljavljena praksa Komisije kaže, da „urejanje nahajališč, surove nafte, njena proizvodnja in prodaja“ sestavljajo „en ustrezen proizvodni trg“ [3].
Thus, for the purposes of this Decision, ‘production’ will be taken as including both ‘development’ as well as (first) sale of oil.
Zato bo za namene tega sklepa izraz „proizvodnja“ vključeval tudi „urejanje nahajališč“ in (prvo) prodajo nafte.
Assomineraria is a trade association which, in this context, acts on behalf of the main undertakings operating in the exploration and production of hydrocarbons sector in Italy.
Assomineraria je trgovsko združenje, ki na tem področju deluje v imenu najpomembnejših podjetij v sektorju iskanja in pridobivanja ogljikovodikov v Italiji.
The four main companies affiliated to the association are ENI SpA, Edison SpA, Shell Italia E&P SpA and Total E&P Italia SpA.
Najpomembnejša štiri podjetja, povezana z združenjem, so ENI S.p.A., Edison S.p.A, Shell Italia E&P S.p.A in Total E&P Italia S.p.A.
Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which Directive 2004/17/EC applies shall not be subject to that Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Člen 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES določa, da se navedena direktiva ne uporablja za naročila, katerih namen je omogočanje opravljanja dejavnosti, za katere velja Direktiva 2004/17/ES, če je v državi članici, v kateri se dejavnost opravlja, dejavnost neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
Access is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied the relevant EU legislation opening a given sector or a part of it.
Dostop se šteje za neomejenega, če je država članica pri odprtju zadevnega sektorja ali njegovega dela izvajala in uporabila ustrezno zakonodajo EU.
Since Italy has implemented and applied Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons [4], access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 30(3) of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Ker Italija izvaja in uporablja Direktivo 94/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 1994 o pogojih za izdajo in uporabo dovoljenj za iskanje, raziskovanje in izkoriščanje ogljikovodikov [4], se v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 30(3) Direktive 2004/17/ES šteje, da dostop do trga ni omejen.
Direct exposure to competition in a particular market should be evaluated on the basis of various criteria, none of which are, necessarily and per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci na določenem trgu je treba oceniti na podlagi različnih meril, od katerih ni nobeno nujno in samo po sebi odločilno.
For the purposes of assessing whether the relevant operators are subject to direct competition in the markets concerned by this Decision, the market share of the main players and the degree of concentration of those markets shall be taken into account.
Za oceno, ali so ustrezni gospodarski subjekti izpostavljeni neposredni konkurenci na trgih, ki jih zadeva ta sklep, se upoštevata tržni delež glavnih udeležencev in stopnja koncentracije na teh trgih.
Each of the two activities that are the subject of this request (exploration for oil and natural gas and production of oil) have been considered to constitute separate product markets in the previous Commission Decisions referred to in recitals 1 and 2 above.
Obe dejavnosti, ki sta predmet te prošnje (iskanje nafte in zemeljskega plina ter proizvodnja nafte), sta se v predhodnih odločbah Komisije, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 1 in 2, obravnavali kot ločeni proizvodni trgi.
They should therefore be examined separately.
Zato ju je treba preučiti ločeno.
According to Commission practice [5], exploration for oil and natural gas constitutes one relevant product market, since it is not possible from the outset to determine whether the exploration will result in finding oil or natural gas.
Glede na prakso Komisije [5] se iskanje nafte in zemeljskega plina šteje za en ustrezen proizvodni trg, ker na začetku ni mogoče določiti, ali se bo našla nafta ali zemeljski plin.
On the exploration market, exploration companies acquire exploration licenses granted by ‘host countries’ usually via bidding procedures [6].
Podjetja, ki se ukvarjajo z iskanjem, na trgu iskanja pridobijo dovoljenje za odkrivanje, ki ga „država gostiteljica“ navadno podeli na podlagi razpisnega postopka [6].
It has furthermore been established through the same, long-standing, Commission practice, that the geographical scope of that market is worldwide.
Komisija je v svoji dolgoletni praksi tudi potrdila, da ima navedeni trg svetovne geografske razsežnosti.
Given that there is no indication that the definition would be different in this case, it will be maintained for the purposes of this Decision.
Glede na to, da ni videti, da bi bila opredelitev v tem primeru drugačna, se ta za namene tega sklepa ohrani.
The market shares of operators active in exploration can be measured by reference to three variables: the capital expenditure, proven reserves and expected production.
Tržni deleži gospodarskih subjektov, ki se ukvarjajo z iskanjem, se lahko merijo glede na tri spremenljivke: kapitalske naložbe, dokazane rezerve in načrtovano proizvodnjo.
The use of capital expenditure to measure the market shares of operators on the exploration market has been found to be unsuitable, inter alia, because of the large differences between the required levels of investments that are necessary in different geographic areas.
Uporaba kapitalskih naložb za merjenje tržnih deležev gospodarskih subjektov na trgu iskanja se je izkazala za neprimerno, med drugim tudi zaradi velikih razlik med zahtevanimi ravnmi naložb, ki so potrebne na različnih geografskih območjih.
Thus, larger investments are needed to explore for oil and gas in the North Sea than is the case for exploration in, e.g. the Middle East.
Tako so za iskanje nafte in plina v Severnem morju potrebne večje naložbe kot npr. za iskanje na Bližnjem vzhodu.
Two other parameters have typically been applied to assess the market shares of economic operators within this sector, namely, their share of proven reserves and of the expected production [7].
Ponavadi sta bila za ocenjevanje tržnih deležev gospodarskih subjektov v tem sektorju uporabljena ostala dva parametra, tj. delež dokazanih rezerv in načrtovana proizvodnja [7].
As of 31 December 2009, the global, proven oil and gas reserves amounted to a total of 385,58 billion standard cubic metres oil equivalent (in the following Sm3 o. e.) worldwide, according to the available information [8].
Po razpoložljivih podatkih so 31. decembra 2009 dokazane rezerve nafte in plina v svetu znašale 385,58 milijarde standardnih kubičnih metrov ekvivalenta nafte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sm3 (oe)) [8].
As of 1 January 2010, the combined, proven oil and gas reserves in Italy amounted to slightly more than 0,205 billion Sm3 o. e. [9], or slightly more than 0,05 %.
Dne 1. januarja 2010 so skupne dokazane rezerve nafte in plina v Italiji malo presegle 0,205 milijarde Sm3 (oe) [9] oziroma nekoliko več kot 0,05 %.
The share thereof of the individual contracting entities operating in Italy is necessarily even smaller.
Pri tem mora biti delež posameznih naročnikov, ki delujejo v Italiji, še nižji.
Nothing in the available information therefore indicates that the market share of the individual contracting entities operating in Italy would be substantially different if measured in terms of expected production rather than in terms of its share of proven reserves.
Zato nobeden od razpoložljivih podatkov ne kaže, da bi bil tržni delež posameznih naročnikov, ki delujejo v Italiji, bistveno drugačen, če bi ga izmerili glede na pričakovano proizvodnjo in ne glede na dokazane rezerve.
Given the links between proven reserves and actual production these facts can be taken as an indication also of the state of competition on the market concerned here.
Glede na povezave med dokazanimi rezervami in dejansko proizvodnjo se lahko ta dejstva razumejo tudi kot pokazatelj stanja konkurence na zadevnem trgu.
Apart from the state-owned companies, the market is characterised by the presence of international vertically integrated private players named the super majors (BP and ExxonMobil and Shell) as well as a certain number of so-called ‘majors’.
Poleg družb v državni lasti je za trg značilna prisotnost mednarodnih vertikalno povezanih zasebnih udeležencev, tako imenovanih „super velikih“ (BP, ExxonMobil in Shell), ter nekaj tako imenovanih „velikih“.
According to established Commission practice [10], development, production and sales of (crude) oil is a separate product market whose geographic scope is worldwide.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso Komisije [10] tvorijo urejanje nahajališč, proizvodnja in prodaja (surove) nafte ločen proizvodni trg svetovnih geografskih razsežnosti.
Given that there is no indication that the definition would be different in this case it will be maintained for the purposes of this Decision.
Glede na to, da ni videti, da bi bila opredelitev v tem primeru drugačna, se ta za namene tega sklepa ohrani.
According to the available information [11], the total, daily production of oil worldwide amounted to 79,948 million barrels in 2009.
Po razpoložljivih podatkih [11] je leta 2009 svetovna proizvodnja nafte znašala 79,948 milijona sodčkov dnevno.
That same year, a total of 0,095 million barrels per day were produced in Italy giving it a market share of 0,11 %.
Istega leta je Italija proizvedla skupno 0,095 milijona sodčkov dnevno, kar ustreza 0,11-odstotnemu tržnemu deležu.
Looking at the 2009 share of the individual contracting entities operating in Italy, the situation is as follows: with a worldwide production of 1007 thousand [12] barrels per day, ENI has a share of 1,26 % of oil production worldwide; Shell’s worldwide production of 1581 thousand barrels of oil per day [13] gives it a market share amounting to 1,98 % of oil production in the world; Total has a worldwide production of 1381 thousand barrels of oil per day [14] which gives it a market share amounting to 1,73 % of oil production worldwide; finally Edison has a worldwide daily production of 5 thousand barrels of oil per day [15] which gives it a market share amounting to 0,006 % of oil production in the world.
V letu 2009 je bil delež posameznih naročnikov, ki delujejo v Italiji, naslednji: s svetovno proizvodnjo 1007 tisoč [12] sodčkov na dan ima ENI 1,26-odstotni delež svetovne proizvodnje nafte; Shellova svetovna proizvodnja nafte znaša 1581 tisoč sodčkov nafte na dan [13] in tako je njegov tržni delež 1,98 % svetovne proizvodnje nafte; Totalova svetovna proizvodnja nafte znaša 1381 tisoč sodčkov nafte na dan [14] in tako je njegov tržni delež 1,73 % svetovne proizvodnje nafte; in končno, Edisonova svetovna proizvodnja nafte znaša 5 tisoč sodčkov nafte na dan [15] in tako je njegov tržni delež 0,006 % svetovne proizvodnje nafte.
For the purposes of this analysis, it is important to have regard to the degree of concentration in the relevant market as a whole.
Za namene te analize je pomembno upoštevati stopnjo koncentracije na zadevnem trgu v celoti.
In this view, the Commission notes that the market for crude oil production is characterised by the presence of big state-owned companies and three international vertically integrated private players (the so called ‘super majors’: BP, ExxonMobil and Shell whose parts of oil production in 2009 amounted to: 3,2 %, 3,0 % and 2,0 % respectively [16]) as well as a certain number of so-called ‘majors’ [17].
Glede tega Komisija ugotavlja, da je za trg proizvodnje surove nafte značilna prisotnost velikih družb v državni lasti in treh mednarodnih vertikalno povezanih zasebnih udeležencev (tako imenovanih „super velikih“, BP, ExxonMobil in Shell, ki so imeli leta 2009 naslednje deleže v proizvodnji nafte: 3,2 %, 3,0 % oziroma 2,0 % [16]), ter nekaj tako imenovanih „velikih“ [17].
These factors suggest that the market comprises a number of players between whom effective competition can be presumed.
Ti dejavniki kažejo, da je na trgu več udeležencev, med katerimi se lahko predvideva obstoj učinkovite konkurence.
In view of the factors examined in recitals 8 to 16 the condition of direct exposure to competition laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC should be considered to be met in Italy in respect of the following services:
Glede na proučene dejavnike iz uvodnih izjav 8 do 16 se lahko sklepa, da je pogoj za neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci iz člena 30(1) direktive 2004/17/ES v Italiji izpolnjen pri naslednjih storitvah:
Since the condition of unrestricted access to the market is deemed to be met, Directive 2004/17/EC should not apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable the services listed in points (a) and (b) of recital 17 to be carried out in Italy, nor when design contests are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in those geographic areas.
Ker se šteje, da je pogoj neomejenega dostopa do trga izpolnjen, se Direktiva 2004/17/ES ne bi smela uporabljati, če naročniki oddajajo naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti izvedbo storitev, navedenih v točkah (a) in (b) uvodne izjave 17, v Italiji ali če so organizirani natečaji za opravljanje te dejavnosti na takih območjih.
According to the application, in Italy most of exploitation fields produce both oil and gas, in different percentages [18].
Glede na navedbe v prošnji se na večini območij izkoriščanja v Italiji proizvajata tako nafta kot tudi plin, v različnih odstotkih [18].
The production of gas is not subject to this exemption request, and for this sector the provisions of Directive 2004/17/EC continue to apply.
Proizvodnja plina ni predmet te prošnje za izvzetje in za ta sektor se še naprej uporabljajo določbe Direktive 2004/17/ES.