natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance flurprimidol.
[6] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo flurprimidol.
[60 pp.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1962.
[60 str.] doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1962.
Available online: ww.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.htm.
Na voljo na spletu: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.htm.
concerning the non-inclusion of dicloran in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
o nevključitvi diklorana v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS
Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 [2] and (EC) No 1490/2002 [3] lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second and third stages of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 451/2000 [2] in (ES) št. 1490/2002 [3] določata podrobna pravila za izvajanje druge in tretje faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS ter seznam aktivnih snovi, ki jih je treba oceniti zaradi možne vključitve v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
That list included dicloran.
Navedeni seznam je vključeval dikloran.
In accordance with Article 11f of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 and Article 12(1)(a) and Article 12(2)(b) of that Regulation, Commission Decision 2008/744/EC of 18 September 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of dicloran in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance [4] was adopted.
V skladu s členom 11f Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002 ter členom 12(1)(a) in členom 12(2)(b) navedene uredbe je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/744/ES z dne 18. septembra 2008 o nevključitvi diklorana v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov [4].
The original notifier (hereinafter ‘the applicant’) submitted a new application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC requesting the accelerated procedure to be applied, as provided for in Articles 14 to 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5].
Prvotni prijavitelj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vlagatelj) je v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS vložil nov zahtevek za uporabo pospešenega postopka iz členov 14 do 19 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I k Direktivi [5].
The application was submitted to Spain, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002.
Zahtevek je bil vložen pri Španiji, ki je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 1490/2002 imenovana za državo članico poročevalko.
The specification of the active substance and the supported uses are the same as were the subject of Decision 2008/744/EC.
Specifikacija aktivne snovi in podprte uporabe so enake kot v Odločbi 2008/744/ES.
Spain evaluated the additional data submitted by the applicant and prepared an additional report.
Španija je ocenila dodatne podatke, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, in pripravila dodatno poročilo.
It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 6 October 2009.
Navedeno poročilo je 6. oktobra 2009 predložila Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in Komisiji.
In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on dicloran to the Commission on 21 July 2010 [6].
V skladu s členom 20(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in na zahtevo Komisije je Agencija 21. julija 2010 Komisiji predložila svoj sklep o dikloranu [6].
The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and the Animal Health and finalised on 5 May 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for dicloran.
Države članice in Komisija so osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatno poročilo in sklep Agencije pregledale v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 5. maja 2011 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu diklorana.
The additional report by the rapporteur Member State and the conclusion by the Authority concentrate on the concerns that lead to the non-inclusion; in particular, there was a concern with regard to worker exposure.
Dodatno poročilo države članice poročevalke in sklep Agencije obravnavata pomisleke, ki so razlog za nevključitev, zlasti pomislek v zvezi z izpostavljenostjo delavcev.
More concerns were identified in the review report for dicloran.
Dodatni pomisleki so bili izraženi v poročilu o pregledu diklorana.
Additional information was submitted by the applicant, in particular as regards the specification of the technical material, the equivalence of the test materials used in the toxicity studies and the technical material; as commercially manufactured, the mammalian toxicity, the operator and worker exposure and the degradation pathways.
Vlagatelj je predložil dodatne informacije, zlasti o specifikaciji tehničnega materiala, enakovrednosti testnega materiala, uporabljenega v študijah o toksičnosti, in tehničnega materiala; v tržni proizvodnji o toksičnosti za sesalce, izpostavljenosti izvajalcev tretiranja in delavcev ter poteh razgradnje.
However, the additional information provided by the applicant did not permit to eliminate all of the specific concerns arising in respect of dicloran.
Vendar dodatne informacije, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, niso odpravile vseh posebnih pomislekov v zvezi z dikloranom.
The data available were insufficient to conclude on the toxicological relevance of two impurities present in the technical material, for confidentiality reasons referred to as impurities 3 and 4.
Razpoložljivi podatki niso bili dovolj za določitev toksikološkega pomena dveh nečistoč v tehničnem materialu, ki se zaradi zaupnosti imenujeta nečistoči 3 in 4.
Harmful effects on human health were identified.
Ugotovljen je bil škodljiv vpliv na zdravje ljudi.
In particular, worker exposure was found to exceed 100 % of the acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL).
Zlasti je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpostavljenost delavcev presega 100 % dopustne izpostavljenosti izvajalca tretiranja (AOEL).
The consumer risk assessment could not be finalised due to unknown amounts of residues in succeeding crops.
Ocene tveganja za potrošnike ni bilo mogoče dokončati zaradi neznanih količin ostankov v posevkih, ki sledijo v kolobarju.
Information on risks to aquatic organisms from unidentified degradation products of the aqueous photolysis and to non target soil macro-organisms was not sufficient.
Informacije o tveganjih za vodne organizme zaradi neopredeljenih produktov razgradnje pri vodni fotolizi in za neciljne talne makroorganizme niso bile popolne.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) to Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the applicant to submit comments on the draft review report.
Poleg tega je Komisija v skladu s členom 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 vlagatelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k osnutku poročila o pregledu.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the applicant, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the expert meetings of the Authority have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing dicloran satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Kljub argumentom, ki jih je vlagatelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi informacij, predloženih in preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov Agencije, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo dikloran, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
In the interest of clarity, Decision 2008/744/EC should be repealed.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba Odločbo 2008/744/ES razveljaviti.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of a further application for dicloran pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na predložitev dodatnega zahtevka za dikloran v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in poglavjem II Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008.
Dicloran shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Dikloran se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2008/744/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2008/744/ES se razveljavi.
OJ L 251, 19.9.2008, p. 43.
UL L 251, 19.9.2008, str. 43.
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dicloran.
[6] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo dikloran.
[110 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1698.
[110 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1698.
Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.
Na voljo na spletu: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.
In particular, there were the following concerns.
Navedeni so bili zlasti naslednji pomisleki.
It was not demonstrated that the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, is equivalent with those of the test materials used in the toxicological and ecotoxicological studies.
Ni bilo dokazano, da je specifikacija tehničnega materiala v tržni proizvodnji enakovredna specifikacijam testnega materiala, uporabljenega v toksikoloških in ekotoksikoloških študijah.
of 6 June 2011
z dne 6. junija 2011
on establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for notebook computers
o določitvi okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka EU za okolje prenosnim računalnikom
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the EU Ecolabel [1], and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 66/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o znaku EU za okolje [1] in zlasti člena 8(2) Uredbe,
Under Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, the EU Ecolabel may be awarded to those products with a reduced environmental impact during their entire life cycle.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 66/2010 se lahko znak EU za okolje podeli proizvodom z manjšim vplivom na okolje v njihovem celotnem življenjskem krogu.
Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 provides that specific EU Ecolabel criteria are to be established according to product groups.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 66/2010 se posebna merila za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje določijo za skupine proizvodov.
Commission Decision 2001/687/EC [2] has established the ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for portable computers.
Odločba Komisije 2001/687/ES [2] določa okoljska merila ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje za prenosne računalnike.
Following the review of the criteria set out in that Decision, Commission Decision 2005/343/EC [3] has established revised criteria which are valid until 30 June 2011.
Po pregledu meril iz navedene odločbe so bila v Odločbi Komisije 2005/343/ES [3] določena spremenjena merila, ki veljajo do 30. junija 2011.
Those criteria have been further reviewed in the light of technological developments.
Ta merila so bila nadalje pregledana ob upoštevanju tehnološkega razvoja.
In addition, in 2006, the agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the European Community (hereinafter ‘the Agreement’), approved by Council Decision 2006/1005/EC [4], as amended by Decision 2010/C 186/1 of 12 August 2009 of the Management entities under the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the European Community on the coordination of energy-efficiency labelling programmes for office equipment on the revision of the computer specifications in Annex C, part VIII, to the Agreement (hereinafter ‘ENERGY STAR v5.0’) [5] was concluded setting out the criteria for Energy Star.
Poleg tega je bil leta 2006 sklenjen sporazum med vlado Združenih držav Amerike in Evropsko skupnostjo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum), ki določa merila za specifikacije Energy Star in je bil odobren s Sklepom Sveta 2006/1005/ES [4], kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2010/C 186/1 z dne 12. avgusta 2009 upravnih organov, na podlagi Sporazuma med vlado Združenih držav Amerike in Evropsko skupnostjo o usklajevanju programov za označevanje energetske učinkovitosti pisarniške opreme, o spremembi specifikacij za računalnike iz dela VIII Priloge C k Sporazumu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: specifikacije ENERGY STAR 5.0) [5].
Those new criteria, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, should be valid for 3 years from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Ta nova merila ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje morajo veljati tri leta od datuma sprejetja tega sklepa.
Decision 2005/343/EC should be replaced for reasons of clarity.
Odločbo 2005/343/ES je treba zaradi jasnosti nadomestiti.
A transitional period should be allowed for producers whose products have been awarded the Ecolabel for portable computers on the basis of the criteria set out in Decision 2005/343/EC, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
Proizvajalcem, ki so za svoje proizvode prejeli znak za okolje za prenosne računalnike na podlagi meril iz Odločbe 2005/343/ES, je treba omogočiti prehodno obdobje, da bodo imeli dovolj časa za prilagoditev svojih proizvodov, da bodo ti ustrezali spremenjenim merilom in zahtevam.
Producers should also be allowed to submit applications based on the criteria set out in Decision 2005/343/EC or on the criteria set out in this Decision until the lapse of validity of that Decision.
Prav tako je treba do prenehanja veljavnosti Odločbe 2005/343/ES proizvajalcem omogočiti predložitev vlog na podlagi meril iz navedene odločbe ali na podlagi meril iz tega sklepa.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 66/2010,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi člena 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 66/2010 –
The product group ‘notebook computers’ shall comprise devices which have the following characteristics:
Skupina proizvodov „prenosni računalniki“ zajema naprave z naslednjimi značilnostmi:
they perform logical operations and process data and are designed specifically for portability and to be operated for extended periods of time either with or without a direct connection to an AC power source;
izvajajo logične operacije in obdelujejo podatke ter so posebej zasnovane za prenašanje in za delovanje z neposredno povezavo na vir napajanja izmeničnega toka ali brez nje v daljšem obdobju;
they utilise an integrated computer display and are capable of operation off an integrated battery or other portable power source.
imajo vgrajen računalniški prikazovalnik in so zmožne delovati s pomočjo vgrajene baterije ali drugega prenosnega vira napajanja.
If a notebook computer is delivered with an external power supply this power supply is considered part of the notebook computer.
Če je prenosnemu računalniku priložen zunanji napajalnik, se ta napajalnik obravnava kot del prenosnega računalnika.
For the purpose of this Decision, tablet personal computers, which may use touch-sensitive screens along with or instead of other input devices shall be considered notebook computers.
V tem sklepu se tablični osebni računalniki, ki lahko imajo poleg drugih vhodnih enot ali namesto njih zaslone, občutljive na dotik, obravnavajo kot prenosni računalniki.
Digital picture frames shall not be considered notebook computers for the purpose of this Decision.
Digitalni okvirji za slike se v tem sklepu ne obravnavajo kot prenosni računalniki.
In order to be awarded the EU Ecolabel under Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, an item must fall within the product group ‘notebook computers’ as defined in Article 1 of this Decision and must comply with the ecological criteria as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Enoti se podeli znak EU za okolje v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 66/2010, če spada v skupino proizvodov „prenosni računalniki“, kot je opredeljena v členu 1 tega sklepa, in izpolnjuje okoljska merila ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje iz Priloge k temu sklepu.
The criteria for the product group ‘notebook computers’ as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid for 3 years from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Merila za skupino proizvodov „prenosni računalniki“ ter z njimi povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo tri leta od datuma sprejetja tega sklepa.
For administrative purposes the code number assigned to the product group ‘notebook computers’ shall be ‘018’.
Za upravne namene se skupini proizvodov „prenosni računalniki“ dodeli številčna oznaka „018“.
Decision 2005/343/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2005/343/ES se razveljavi.
By derogation from Article 5, applications for the EU Ecolabel for products falling within the product group ‘portable computers’ as defined in Decision 2005/343/EC submitted before the date of adoption of this Decision shall be evaluated in accordance with the conditions laid down in Decision 2005/343/EC.
Z odstopanjem od člena 5 se vloge za pridobitev znaka EU za okolje za proizvode iz skupine proizvodov „prenosni računalniki“, kot je opredeljena v Odločbi 2005/343/ES, ki so bile predložene pred datumom sprejetja tega sklepa, ocenijo v skladu s pogoji iz Odločbe 2005/343/ES.
Applications for the EU Ecolabel for products falling within the product group ‘notebook computers’ submitted from the date of adoption of this Decision but by 30 June 2011 at the latest may be based either on the criteria set out in Decision 2005/343/EC or on the criteria set out in this Decision.
Vloge za pridobitev znaka EU za okolje za proizvode iz skupine proizvodov „prenosni računalniki“, predložene po datumu sprejetja tega sklepa, vendar najpozneje do 30. junija 2011, lahko temeljijo na merilih iz Odločbe 2005/343/ES ali na merilih iz tega sklepa.
Those applications shall be evaluated in accordance with the criteria on which they are based.
Te vloge se ocenijo v skladu z merili, na katerih temeljijo.
Where the Ecolabel is awarded on the basis of an application evaluated in accordance with the criteria set out in Decision 2005/343/EC, that Ecolabel may be used for 12 months from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Če se znak za okolje podeli na podlagi vloge, ocenjene v skladu z merili iz Odločbe 2005/343/ES, se ta znak lahko uporablja 12 mesecev od datuma sprejetja tega sklepa.
Done at Brussels, 6 June 2011.
V Bruslju, 6. junija 2011
OJ C 186, 9.7.2010, p. 1.
UL C 186, 9.7.2010, str. 1.
The criteria aim at promoting reduction of environmental damage or risks related to the use of energy (global warming, acidification, depletion of non-renewable energy sources) by reducing energy consumption, reduction of environmental damage related to the use of natural resources and reduction of environmental damage related to the use of hazardous substances by reducing the use of such substances.
Cilj meril je spodbujanje zmanjševanja okoljske škode ali tveganj, povezanih z uporabo energije (globalno segrevanje, zakisljevanje, siromašenje neobnovljivih virov energije), z zmanjšanjem porabe energije, zmanjševanja okoljske škode, povezane z uporabo naravnih virov, in zmanjševanja okoljske škode, povezane z uporabo nevarnih snovi, z zmanjšanjem njihove uporabe.
energy savings;
Prihranki energije
power management;
Upravljanje porabe energije
mercury in fluorescent lamps;
Živo srebro v fluorescentnih žarnicah
hazardous substances and mixtures;
Nevarne snovi in zmesi
substances listed in accordance with Article 59(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1];
Snovi, navedene v skladu s členom 59(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1]
plastic parts;
Plastični deli
noise;
Hrup
recycled content;
Reciklirana vsebina
user instructions;
Navodila za uporabo
reparability;
Popravila
design for disassembly;
Razstavljanje
lifetime extension;
Podaljšanje življenjske dobe
packaging;
Embalaža
information appearing on the Ecolabel.
Informacije, ki so navedene na znaku za okolje
Where the applicant is required to provide declarations, documentation, analyses, test reports, or other evidence to show compliance with the criteria, it is understood that these may originate from the applicant and/or his supplier(s) and/or their supplier(s), etc as appropriate.
Kadar mora vlagatelj predložiti izjave, dokumentacijo, analize, poročila o preskusih ali druga dokazila o izpolnjevanju meril, lahko ti izvirajo od vlagatelja in/ali njegovega(-ih) dobavitelja(-ev) in/ali njihovega(-ih) dobavitelja(-ev) itn.
Where possible, the testing should be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements of EN ISO 17025 or equivalent.
Kadar je mogoče, morajo preskuse opraviti laboratoriji, ki izpolnjujejo splošne zahteve iz standarda EN ISO 17025 ali enakovrednega standarda.
Where appropriate, test methods other than those indicated for each criterion may be used if the competent body assessing the application accepts their equivalence.
Po potrebi se lahko poleg metod, navedenih za posamezno merilo, uporabljajo druge preskusne metode, če njihovo enakovrednost odobri pristojni organ, ki ocenjuje vlogo.
Criterion 1 —
Merilo 1
Energy savings for notebook computers
Prihranki energije za prenosne računalnike
The energy-efficiency performance of notebook computers shall exceed the appropriate category energy-efficiency requirements set out in the Agreement as amended by ENERGY STAR v5.0 by at least:
Energetska učinkovitost prenosnih računalnikov presega zahteve glede energetske učinkovitosti za ustrezno kategorijo, določene v Sporazumu, kakor je bil spremenjen z ENERGY STAR 5.0, za najmanj:
category A: 25 %,
kategorija A: 25 %,
category B: 25 %,
kategorija B: 25 %,
category C: 15 %.
kategorija C: 15 %.
Capability adjustments allowed under the Agreement as amended by ENERGY STAR v5.0 may be applied at the same level, except in the case of Discrete Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) where no additional allowance shall be given.
Prilagoditve zmogljivosti, ki so dovoljene v skladu s Sporazumom, kakor je bil spremenjen s specifikacijami ENERGY STAR 5.0, se lahko uporabljajo na isti ravni, razen v primeru diskretnih grafičnih procesnih enot (GPU), za katere ni dodatnih dodelitev.
Assessment and verification: the applicant shall declare the compliance of the product with these requirements to the competent body.
Ocenjevanje in preverjanje: vlagatelj pristojnemu organu predloži izjavo o skladnosti proizvoda s temi zahtevami.
Criterion 2 —
Merilo 2
Power management
Upravljanje porabe energije
Notebook computers shall comply with power management requirements [2] as follows:
Prenosni računalniki izpolnjujejo naslednje zahteve [2] glede upravljanja porabe energije:
Power management requirements
Zahteve glede upravljanja porabe energije
Notebook computers shall be shipped with the power management system enabled at the time of delivery to the customers.
Prenosni računalniki so ob dobavi opremljeni s sistemom za upravljanje porabe energije, omogočenim v času dostave potrošnikom.
Power management settings shall be:
Nastavitve za upravljanje porabe energije so: