natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This sales structure bears a very high risk of cross-compensation as PET subject to an undertaking could be sold together with other products to the same customers and prices set for a variety of products sold to the same client could be very easily compensated or off-set.
Pri tej prodajni strukturi obstaja zelo veliko tveganje navzkrižnih nadomestil, ker bi se lahko PET, za katerega velja zaveza, prodajal istim kupcem skupaj z drugimi izdelki in bi se lahko cene, določene za različne izdelke, prodane istemu kupcu, zlahka kompenzirale ali izravnale.
On the basis of the above, it was concluded that such undertaking was impractical and therefore it cannot be accepted.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila taka zaveza nepraktična in se zato ne more sprejeti.
The party was informed accordingly and given an opportunity to comment.
Stran je bila ustrezno obveščena, pri čemer je imela možnost za predložitev pripomb.
However, its comments have not altered the above conclusion.
Njene pripombe kljub temu niso spremenile zgoraj navedenega sklepa.
In view of the magnitude of the countervailable subsidies found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional duty imposed by the provisional Regulation be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of definitive duties imposed,
Glede na obseg ugotovljene stopnje izravnalnih subvencij in glede na raven škode, povzročene industriji Unije, se zdi nujno, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno dajatvijo, ki jo je uvedla začasna uredba, dokončno pobirajo v obsegu višine uvedenih dokončnih dajatev –
A definitive countervailing duty is hereby imposed on imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, currently falling within CN code 39076020 and originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates.
Uvede se dokončna izravnalna dajatev na uvoz polietilen tereftalata z viskoznostjo 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, ki trenutno spada pod oznako KN 39076020 in s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov.
The rate of the definitive countervailing duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne izravnalne dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke iz odstavka 1 je:
Definitive countervailing duty rate (EUR/tonne)
Dokočna stopnja izravnalne dajatve (EUR/tono)
In cases where goods have been damaged before entry into free circulation and, therefore, the price actually paid or payable is apportioned for the determination of the customs value pursuant to Article 145 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [7], the amount of definitive countervailing duty, calculated on the amounts set above, shall be reduced by a percentage which corresponds to the apportioning of the price actually paid or payable.
Če se blago uniči še pred vstopom v prosti promet in se zato cena, ki so jo kupci dejansko plačali ali se plačuje, pri določanju carinske vrednosti porazdeli v skladu s členom 145 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [7], se znesek dokončne izravnalne dajatve, izračunan na podlagi zgoraj določenega zneska, zmanjša za odstotek, ki ustreza porazdelitvi cene, ki se je dejansko plačala ali se plačuje.
The amounts secured by way of provisional countervailing duty pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) No 473/2010 on imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, currently falling within CN code 39076020 and originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates, shall be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive countervailing duty imposed pursuant to Article 1.
Zneski, ki se zagotovijo z začasno izravnalno dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 473/2010 o uvozu polietilen tereftalata z viskoznostjo 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, ki trenutno spada pod oznako KN 39076020 in s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov, se dokončno poberejo po stopnji dokončne izravnalne dajatve, uvedene v skladu s členom 1.
The amounts secured in excess of the rate of the definitive countervailing duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo stopnjo dokončne izravnalne dajatve, se sprostijo.
See for example Council Regulations (EC) No 713/2005 (OJ L 121, 13.5.2005, p. 1) and (EC) No 1176/2008 (OJ L 319, 29.11.2008, p. 1).
Glej na primer uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 713/2005, UL L 121, 13.5.2005, str. 1 in (ES) št. 1176/2008, UL L 319, 29.11.2008, str. 1.
Case T-210/95 European Fertilizer Manufacturers’ Association (EFMA) v Council of the European Union, ECR 1999, p. II-3291.
Zadeva T-210/95, European Fertilizer Manufacturers‘ Association (EFMA) proti Svetu Evropske unije, Zbirka odločb 1999, str. II-3291.
This claim has to be rejected since the same abovementioned Article 14 concludes that ‘the government provision of equity capital shall not be considered as conferring a benefit, unless the investment decision can be regarded as inconsistent with the usual investment practice of private investors in the territory of that Member’.
To trditev je treba zavrniti, ker je v zgoraj navedenem členu 14 določeno, da „kapitalski vložek vlade ne velja kot vir koristi, razen če odločitev o vlaganju odstopa od običajne vlagateljske prakse […] zasebnih vlagateljev na ozemlju članice“.
This practice is indeed inconsistent with the usual investment practice of private investors since no commercial organisation in any WTO Member would conceivably continue to provide such non-repayable funding.
Ta praksa dejansko odstopa od običajne vlagateljske prakse zasebnih vlagateljev, ker verjetno nobena trgovska organizacija v nobeni članici STO ne bi nadaljevala s takšnim nepovratnim financiranjem.
The cooperating exporting producer also claimed that there was no breach of Article 349 of Chapter XV of the Pakistani Customs Rules 2001.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil tudi, da ni bilo nobene kršitve člena 349 poglavja XV pakistanskih carinskih predpisov iz leta 2001.
In this respect it was submitted that the Manufacturing Bond covers all the company’s factory and thus the premises of the warehouse fulfilled the relevant rules requesting an independent area having an independent entry or exit from a public area and having no other entry or exit with the manufacturing area and separate stores of finished goods, rejects and waste clearly ear-marked in the premises.
V zvezi s tem je trdil, da zajema proizvodnja pod carinskim nadzorom vse tovarne družbe in da so zato skladiščni prostori izpolnjevali ustrezna pravila, v skladu s katerimi mora neodvisno območje imeti samostojni vhod ali izhod, ločen od javnega območja, in ne sme imeti nobenega drugega vhoda ali izhoda, pri čemer morajo biti območje proizvodnje in ločena skladišča končnega blaga, zavrnjenega blaga in odpadkov v objektih jasno označena.
Concerning this scheme both parties claimed that the interest rate used to calculate the subsidy margin has to be the interest rate available to the concerned exporter during the IP.
V zvezi s to shemo sta obe strani navedli, da mora biti obrestna mera, ki se uporabi za izračun stopnje subvencije, enaka obrestni meri, ki je na voljo zadevnemu izvozniku v OP.
Further, the parties argued that as the plant, machinery and equipment were used for the production of PET meant for exports as well as domestic sales, the subsidy margin should be determined on the basis of the total turnover of the exporting producer.
Poleg tega strani trdita, da je treba stopnjo subvencije določiti na podlagi celotnega prihodka od prodaje proizvajalca izvoznika, ker so se naprave, stroji in oprema uporabili za proizvodnjo PET, namenjenega za izvoz in domačo prodajo.
In relation to this scheme, the GOP provided with its comments on the provisional Regulation a Government Order issued on 28 June 2010 stating that the SRO No 1045(I)/2008 has been repealed with effect from 1 July 2010.
V zvezi s to shemo je pakistanska vlada skupaj s svojimi pripombami o začasni uredbi priložila vladno odredbo, izdano 28. junija 2010, ki navaja, da se SRO št. 1045(I)/2008 s 1. julijem 2010 razveljavi.
The GOP submitted that this development will ensure that no refund on domestically procured or imported PTA is allowed or will be allowed anymore to the users of PTA.
Pakistanska vlada je navedla, da bo ta ukrep zagotovil, da za uporabnike prečiščene tereftalne kisline ni ali ne bo več dovoljeno nobeno vračilo za doma proizvedeno ali uvoženo PTA.
In addition, the cooperating exporting producer provided a set of calculations made in excel format for the years 2008 and 2009 and a notice of tax demand and assessment order issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax which revised a set of figures of the company’s 2008 income tax return statement.
Poleg tega je sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik predložil sklop izračunov v Excelu za leti 2008 in 2009 ter obvestilo o davčni zahtevi in odredbo o oceni, ki jo je izdal namestnik komisarja za davek od dohodka, ki je pregledal podatke iz napovedi za odmero davka od dohodka družbe za leto 2008.
The GOP corroborated the claims of the cooperating exporting producer by arguing that the provided calculations show that the cooperating exporting producer has paid more tax under the FTR regime compared to what it would have paid in case of application of the NTR regime.
Pakistanska vlada je podprla trditve sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika z navedbo, da kažejo predloženi izračuni na višje plačilo davka v okviru režima FTR s strani sodelujočega proizvajalca, kot bi ga ta plačal v okviru NTR.
With respect to the submitted documentation relating to 2009 it is noted that the parties have not provided the cooperating exporting producer’s 2009 income tax return statement.
V zvezi s predloženo dokumentacijo za leto 2009 je bilo ugotovljeno, da strani niso predložile napovedi za odmero davka od dohodka sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika za leto 2009.
Instead of providing the official tax declarations and return statements, an Excel calculation was provided as evidence.
Namesto uradnih davčnih napovedi so bili kot dokaz predloženi Excelovi izračuni.
Such kind of information is clearly non verifiable and cannot corroborate any claim made for post IP income tax developments.
Takšne informacije očitno niso preverljive in ne morejo podpreti nobene trditve v zvezi z dogodki na področju davka od dohodka po OP.
However, when calculating the subsidy amount under the FTR, a clerical error referring to the cooperating exporting producer’s export income as stated in the company’s 2008 income tax return statement was discovered.
Vendar je bila pri izračunu zneska subvencije v okviru FTR ugotovljena pisna napaka v zvezi z dohodkom od izvoza sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, kot je naveden v napovedi za odmero davka od dohodka družbe za leto 2008.
This was corrected accordingly.
Napaka je bila ustrezno popravljena.
Both parties claimed that the interest rate used to calculate the subsidy margin of this financing scheme has to be the interest rate available at the time the exporting producer was negotiating the fixed rate financing, namely the rate in the year 2004-2005.
Obe strani sta navedli, da mora biti obrestna mera, uporabljena v izračunu stopnje subvencije te sheme financiranja, obrestna mera, ki je bila na voljo, ko se je proizvajalec izvoznik dogovarjal o financiranju s fiksno obrestno mero, in sicer obrestno mero v obdobju 2004–2005.
Furthermore, the denominator used to calculate the provisional subsidy margin should be the total company turnover rather than the total export turnover, given that the same manufacturing facilities which are financed under the LTF-EOP are used to produce both domestic and exported goods.
Poleg tega bi moral biti imenovalec, uporabljen v izračunu začasne stopnje subvencije, celotni prihodek od prodaje družbe in ne celotni prihodek od izvoza, glede na to, da se za proizvodnjo domačega in izvoženega blaga uporabljajo enake proizvodne zmogljivosti, financirane iz LTF-EOP.
The Government of Pakistan submitted that the PET sector was excluded from this scheme by a decision taken by the State Bank of Pakistan on 28 June 2010.
Pakistanska vlada je navedla, da je bil sektor PET izključen iz te sheme na podlagi odločitve državne banke Pakistana z dne 28. junija 2010.
It was thus argued that this scheme is in line with the provisions of Article 15 of the basic Regulation and that the Commission should not countervail since it is demonstrated that the subsidy is withdrawn.
Zato je bilo navedeno, da je ta shema v skladu z določbami iz člena 15 osnovne uredbe in proti njej Komisija ne bi smela uvesti izravnalnih ukrepov, ker je dokazano, da je bila subvencija ukinjena.
As regards these points the GOP clarified, by providing the necessary documentation, that companies which do not hold short-term loans under this scheme within the Pakistani Financial Year 2009-2010 (i.e. up to 30 June 2010) are not entitled to any benefit in the transitional period up to 2011.
Kar zadeva te točke, je pakistanska vlada s predložitvijo potrebne dokumentacije pojasnila, da družbe, ki v okviru te sheme v finančnem letu 2009–2010 v Pakistanu (to je do 30. junija 2010) nimajo kratkoročnih posojil, v prehodnem obdobju do leta 2011 niso upravičene do nobenih ugodnosti.
As to the claim that the cooperating exporting producer has no outstanding financing under the EFS it is noted that this claim has been substantiated with a set of evidence provided by the relevant banks and complemented by the company’s chartered accountant.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik nima neporavnanih zneskov v okviru EFS, se ugotavlja, da je bila ta trditev utemeljena z več dokazi, ki so jih zagotovile ustrezne banke, in da jo je potrdil zapriseženi revizor družbe.
The cooperating exporting producer also claimed that the interest rate used to calculate the subsidy margin has to be the short-term interest rate available to the company during the IP.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi navedel, da mora biti obrestna mera, ki se uporabi za izračun stopnje subvencije, kratkoročna obrestna mera, ki je na voljo družbi v OP.
It was also argued that the finance obtained is used to meet the overall financing needs of the company’s current assets for both domestic and export sales and thus the denominator in the subsidy margin calculation should be the total company’s turnover.
Prav tako je bilo navedeno, da se pridobljena sredstva uporabljajo za izpolnjevanje splošnih finančnih potreb gibljivih sredstev družbe za domačo prodajo in izvoz, zato bi moral biti imenovalec v izračunu stopnje subvencije celotni prihodek od prodaje družbe.
Thus, it is not correct to say that all industrial undertakings in the UAE operate under Federal Law No 1 of 1979.
Zato navedba, da vsa industrijska podjetja v ZAE delujejo na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979, ni pravilna.
Thus it is not proved that the allocation of the scheme is automatic and the relevant claim has to be rejected.
Samodejna zagotovitev dostopa do sheme torej ni dokazana, zato je treba zadevno trditev zavrniti.
With respect to Articles 11 and 12 it is noted that these articles set out the role and responsibilities of the various bodies of the state authority issuing the Industrial Licence under Federal Law No 1 of 1979.
V zvezi s členoma 11 in 12 se ugotavlja, da določata vlogo in odgovornosti različnih državnih organov, ki izdajajo industrijska dovoljenja na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979.
The fact that a body has never been established although it is foreseen by the law and it is responsible for: (i) assessing the input provided by the Industrial Development Department and (ii) recommending to the Minister the approval or rejection of applications, confirms that the legislation pursuant to which the granting authority operates is in practice not followed and thus there is no legal certainty on the way the subsidy is granted.
Dejstvo, da organ nikoli ni bil ustanovljen, čeprav ga predvideva zakon in je odgovoren za: (i) ocenjevanje prispevka Oddelka za industrijski razvoj in (ii) priporočila ministru glede odobritve ali zavrnitve vlog, potrjuje, da se zakonodaja, v skladu s katero deluje organ, ki izda dovoljenje, v praksi ne upošteva in zato v zvezi z dodeljevanjem subvencij ni pravne varnosti.
Moreover, in fact the claim of the GUAE with respect to the Technical Committee is contradictory to previous claims according to which the Minister requested this committee to provide comments on a possible revision of the law.
Poleg tega je trditev vlade ZAE v zvezi tehničnim odborom dejansko v nasprotju s prejšnjimi trditvami, v skladu s katerimi minister poziva ta odbor k predložitvi pripomb glede morebitne revizije zakona.
The GUAE submitted that its industrial statistics prove that there are more than 4000 industrial firms registered under Federal Law No 1 of 1979.
Vlada ZAE je navedla, da njena industrijska statistika dokazuje, da je v okviru Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 registriranih več kot 4000 industrijskih podjetij.
Both parties argued that the Commission failed to provide positive evidence that the UAE authorities have exercised discretion in granting or rejecting applications to the scheme.
Obe strani sta trdili, da Komisija ni predložila trdnih dokazov o tem, da so organi ZAE uveljavljali svojo diskrecijsko pravico pri odobravanju ali zavračanju vlog za pristop k shemi.
The cooperating exporting producer has failed to demonstrate how a general statement in the WTO Trade Policy Review document is more accurate than the detailed analysis, based on the verification visit, provided in the provisional Regulation explicitly on the eligibility and practical implementations of the Federal Law No 1 of 1979.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik ni dokazal, v čem je splošna izjava v dokumentu STO o pregledu trgovinske politike natančnejša od podrobne analize na podlagi preveritvenega obiska, ki je vključena v začasni uredbi ter izrecno zadeva upravičenost in praktično izvajanje Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979.
Even more importantly, the investigation has established that the authorities act in a discriminatory way when managing the importation of duty-free materials under the scheme.
Kar je še pomembneje, v preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da organi pri upravljanju uvoza dajatev prostih surovin v okviru sheme ravnajo diskriminatorno.
With respect to the revision of the Federal Law No 1 of 1979 it is pertinent to note that the text provided by GUAE is an internal draft document of the Ministry of Finance and Industry.
Kar zadeva revizijo Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979, je treba navesti, da je besedilo, ki ga je predložila vlada ZAE, osnutek internega dokumenta Ministrstva za finance in industrijo.
As such it has no legal value.
Kot takšen nima pravne vrednosti.
In other words something that was imported up to July 2010 (when the duty rate was 7,5 %) may be used up to July 2012.
To pomeni, da se lahko blago, uvoženo do julija 2010 (ko je bila stopnja dajatve 7,5 %), lahko uporablja do julija 2012.
The institutions have made a determination of the amount of subsidy on the basis of data pertaining to the IP and in accordance with the scheme rules there may still be an impact of the previous customs rate up to 2012.
Institucije so določile znesek subvencije na podlagi podatkov, ki se nanašajo na OP, v skladu s pravili sheme pa je lahko še vedno prisoten vpliv prejšnje stopnje dajatve do leta 2012.
Thus, subsidisation is clearly present at the time of the definitive duty imposition.
Tako je ob uvedbi dokončne dajatve subvencioniranje jasno prisotno.
Furthermore, the customs duty is just one element of the data set and, as demonstrated under recitals (43) to (53) above, if the duty rate had been lower, import volumes may have been higher.
Poleg tega je carina le eden od elementov podatkovnega niza, pri čemer bi lahko bil, kot je prikazano v uvodnih izjavah (43) do (53) zgoraj, obseg uvoza večji, če bi bila stopnja dajatve nižja.
The UAE cooperating exporting producer repeated its claims concerning the Federal Law 1 of 1979.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik iz ZAE je ponovil svoje trditve v zvezi z Zveznim zakonom št. 1 iz leta 1979.
It also submitted that there are errors in the calculation of the subsidy margin.
Prav tako je navedel, da obstajajo napake v izračunih stopnje subvencije.
The Iranian exporter claimed that financial and technical problems of some EU producers were not properly separated from the injury analysis and wrongly attributed to Iranian imports since it only entered the market after 2006.
Iranski izvoznik je trdil, da finančne in tehnične težave nekaterih proizvajalcev EU niso bile ustrezno ločene od analize škode ter so se napačno pripisale iranskemu uvozu, ko je komaj vstopil na trg po letu 2006.
In this respect it is noted that imports from Iran were present already in 2006 and 2007 in quantities below 1 % of the market share.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da je bil uvoz iz Irana prisoten že leta 2006 in 2007, njegova količina pa ni presegla 1 % tržnega deleža.
It is also reiterated that, as mentioned in recitals (233) and (234) of the provisional Regulation, the financial situation of the sampled Union producers was very bad during the whole period considered and that they experienced significant losses between 2006 and the IP.
Prav tako se opozarja, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (233) in (234) začasne uredbe, da je bil finančni položaj vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju zelo slab ter da so med letom 2006 in OP utrpeli velike izgube.
Again, in such a situation, it would be unreasonable to expect any major investment by the Union producers.
V takih razmerah torej ne bi bilo razumno pričakovati kakršnih koli velikih naložb proizvajalcev Unije.
It was claimed that up to 900000 tonnes of imports would be needed in 2010.
Poleg tega je bilo navedeno, da bi bilo leta 2010 treba uvoziti 900000 ton.
This problem would be notably reinforced by the fact that some EU producers are also PET processors and would only sell to the free market once their internal demand is satisfied and at premium prices.
Ta težava bi se bistveno povečala zaradi dejstva, da so nekateri proizvajalci EU tudi predelovalci PET in bi prodajali po premijskih cenah na prostem trgu le, ko bi zadovoljili domače povpraševanje.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, Office N105 04/092, 1049 Brussels, BELGIUM.
Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za trgovino, Direktorat H, pisarna N105 04/092, 1049 Brussels, BELGIJA.
One exporting producer claimed that PET should be subdivided into different product types according to their different viscosity numbers since the viscosity number is essential to determine the different possible applications of the PET type produced. It was considered that the claim should be accepted and the methodology for calculating injury margins was adapted accordingly.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo treba PET razdeliti na različne vrste izdelkov v skladu z njihovo različno viskoznostjo, ker je viskoznost bistvena za določitev različnih možnih načinov uporabe zadevne proizvedene vrste PET. Upoštevalo se je, da bi bilo trditev treba sprejeti, zato je bila metodologija za izračun stopenj škode ustrezno prilagojena.