natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The partial interim review investigation was also to assess the need, depending on the review findings, to amend the rate of duty currently applicable to imports of the product concerned from exporting producers in the country concerned not individually mentioned in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007, i.e. the anti-dumping duty rate as applying to ‘all other companies’ in India.
Preiskava v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom je tudi ocenila potrebo, odvisno od ugotovitev pregleda, po spremembi stopnje dajatve, ki velja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz zadevne države, ki niso poimensko navedeni v členu 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2007, torej stopnje protidampinške dajatve, ki velja za vse druge družbe v Indiji.
The investigation of the level of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava ravni dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2008 do 30. septembra 2009 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The Commission officially informed the applicant, the authorities of the exporting country, and the Union industry, of the initiation of the partial interim review investigation.
Komisija je vložnika, organe države izvoznice in industrijo Unije uradno obvestila o začetku preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom.
In order to obtain the information necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent a questionnaire to the applicant and received a reply within the deadline set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku poslala vprašalnik, da bi pridobila informacije, ki so potrebne za njeno preiskavo, ta pa ga je izpolnjenega vrnil v določenem roku.
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the determination of dumping.
Komisija je iskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev dampinga.
A verification visit was carried out at the premises of the applicant.
V prostorih vložnika je bil izveden preveritveni obisk.
The product concerned by this review is the same as that defined in Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 imposing the measures in force, namely polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, originating in India, currently falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290.
Izdelek, ki ga zajema ta pregled, je enak kot izdelek, kot ga opredeljuje Uredba (ES) št. 1292/2007 o uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov, in sicer folija iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, ki se uvršča pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290.
As in previous investigations, this investigation has shown that PET film produced in India and exported to the Union and the PET film produced and sold domestically on the Indian market, as well as the PET film produced and sold in the EU by the Union producers, have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Ta preiskava je podobno kot prejšnje pokazala, da imajo PET folija, proizvedena v Indiji in izvožena v Unijo, ter PET folija, proizvedena in prodana na domačem indijskem trgu, ter PET folija, ki jo proizvedejo in prodajo v EU proizvajalci Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe.
These products are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ti izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za podobne izdelke.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the applicant’s domestic sales of the like product to independent customers were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to at least 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej preučila, ali je bila vložnikova domača prodaja podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna, torej ali je bil celoten obseg takšne prodaje vsaj enak 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza v Unijo.
The Commission subsequently identified those types of the like product sold domestically by the company that were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Union.
Komisija je nato opredelila tiste vrste podobnega izdelka, ki jih je družba prodala na domačem trgu in so bile identične ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, izvoženimi v Unijo.
It was further examined whether the domestic sales of the applicant were representative for each product type, i.e. whether domestic sales of each product type constituted at least 5 % of the sales volume of the same product type to the Union.
Nadalje je bilo preučeno še, ali je domača prodaja vložnika za posamezno vrsto izdelka reprezentativna, torej ali je domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka vsaj enaka 5 % obsega prodaje enake vrste izdelka v Unijo.
For the product types sold in representative quantities it was then examined whether such sales were made in the ordinary course of trade, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Nato se je za vrste izdelkov, ki so se prodajale v reprezentativnih količinah, ugotavljalo, ali je bila taka prodaja opravljena po običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
The examination as to whether the domestic sales of each product type, sold domestically in representative quantities, could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade was made by establishing the proportion of the profitable sales to independent customers of the type in question.
Preučitev tega, ali bi se za domačo prodajo posamezne vrste izdelka, prodanega na domačem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah, lahko upoštevalo, kot da je bila opravljena po običajnem poteku trgovine, je bila opravljena z določitvijo deleža dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam za zadevno vrsto.
In all cases where the domestic sales of the particular product type were made in sufficient quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of all the domestic sales of that type made during the RIP.
Kadar je bila domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka opravljena v zadostnih količinah in po običajnem poteku trgovine, je normalna vrednost vedno temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje celotne domače prodaje zadevne vrste v OPP.
For the remaining product types where domestic sales were not representative or not sold in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za preostale vrste izdelkov, katerih domača prodaja ni bila reprezentativna ali opravljena po običajnem poteku trgovine, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable percentage for selling, general and administrative expenses and a reasonable margin for profit, on the basis of actual data pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product, by the exporting producer under investigation in accordance with the first sentence of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da se je proizvodnim stroškom izvoženih vrst po potrebi dodal ustrezen delež za prodajo, za splošne in upravne izdatke ter primerna stopnja dobička na podlagi dejanskih podatkov o proizvodnji in prodaji, ki jih je preiskovani proizvajalec izvoznik v skladu s prvim stavkom člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe uporabljal pri običajnem poteku trgovine s podobnim izdelkom.
Since all export sales of the cooperating Indian exporting producer to the Union were made directly to independent customers, the export price was established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Ker je bil ves izvoz sodelujočega indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika v Unijo opravljen neposredno neodvisnim strankam, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
For this purpose, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, commissions, financial costs and packing costs paid by the applicant where applicable and justified.
V ta namen so bile narejene ustrezne prilagoditve za razlike pri stroških prevoza, zavarovanja, manipuliranja, natovarjanja in drugih dodatnih stroških, stroških provizij, finančnih stroških ter stroških pakiranja, ki jih je vložnik plačal, kjer je bilo to potrebno in upravičeno.
This comparison did not show the existence of dumping.
Ta primerjava ni pokazala obstoja dampinga.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je preučilo tudi, ali bi se glede spremenjenih okoliščin lahko štelo, da so trajne narave.
In this regard the investigation showed that after the previous investigation, i.e. the expiry review referred to in recital 5, Garware has made significant changes in its production process and technology.
V zvezi s tem je preiskava pokazala, da je Garware po prejšnji preiskavi, torej pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa iz uvodne izjave 5, bistveno spremenil svoj postopek in tehnologijo proizvodnje.
The company has shifted from dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) to purified terephthalic acid (PTA) as the main raw material.
Družba je glavno surovino dimetil tereftalat (DMT) zamenjala s prečiščeno tereftalno kislino (PTA).
During the investigation period of that expiry review Garware was the only Indian exporting producer which was still using the old technology based on DMT.
V obdobju preiskave navedenega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa je bila družba Garware edini indijski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je še vedno uporabljal staro tehnologijo na podlagi DMT.
This change of technology as well as the investment in a new plant for manufacturing chips has resulted in a significant reduction of costs of manufacturing between the previous expiry review and the current review.
Sprememba tehnologije in naložbe v nov obrat za proizvodnjo čipov so bistveno znižale proizvodne stroške od prejšnjega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov do trenutnega pregleda.
This cost reduction has a direct impact on the dumping margin.
To znižanje stroškov neposredno vpliva na stopnjo dampinga.
This change in circumstances can therefore be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Ta sprememba okoliščin se zato lahko šteje kot trajne narave.
It should be also noted that an indicative dumping margin calculated for export sales of the applicant to third countries in the RIP was negative.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba tudi, da je bila izračunana indikativna stopnja dampinga za izvoz vložnika v tretje države v OPP negativna.
In terms of volume these sales were several times higher than the export sales to the Union.
Ta izvoz je bil po obsegu nekajkrat večji od izvoza v Unijo.
It was therefore considered that the circumstances that led to the initiation of this interim review are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the interim review.
Zaradi tega se je štelo, da se okoliščine, ki so privedle do začetka tega vmesnega pregleda, v bližnji prihodnosti verjetno ne bodo toliko spremenile, da bi vplivale na ugotovitve iz vmesnega pregleda.
Therefore it was concluded that the changed circumstances are of a lasting nature and that the application of the measure at its current level is no longer justified.
Zato se je sklenilo, da so spremenjene okoliščine trajne narave in da uporaba ukrepa na sedanji ravni ni več upravičena.
In the light of the results of this review investigation, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from Garware to 0 %.
Glede na rezultate te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se zdi primerno, da se protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka družbe Garware, spremeni na 0 %.
Pursuant to 14(1) of the basic Regulation and Article 24(1), second subparagraph of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 [11], no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from export subsidisation.
Na podlagi člena 14(1) osnovne uredbe in drugega pododstavka člena 24(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 [11] za noben izdelek ne smejo hkrati veljati protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za obravnavanje enih in istih razmer, ki izhajajo iz dampinga ali izvoznega subvencioniranja.
As mentioned in recital 9 above, the applicant is subject to a countervailing duty.
Za vložnika velja izravnalna dajatev, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 9.
Since the anti-dumping duty established for the applicant is 0 % with regard to the product concerned, this situation does not arise in the present case.
Ker je protidampinška dajatev za vložnika v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom 0 %, v tem primeru ni nastal takšen položaj.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose to amend the duty rate applicable to the applicant and were given opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala predlagati sprememba stopnje dajatve, ki se uporablja za vložnika, in so imele možnost, da podajo svoje pripombe.
No comments were received,
Prejete niso bile nobene pripombe –
The entry concerning Garware Polyester Limited, in the table in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007, shall be replaced by the following:
Vnos v zvezi z Garware Polyester Limited v razpredelnici iz člena 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2007 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Garware Polyester Limited, Garware House, 50-A, Swami Nityanand Marg, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400 057, India
„Garware Polyester Limited, Garware House, 50-A, Swami Nityanand Marg, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400 057, Indija
OJ L 242, 15.9.2010, p. 6.
UL L 242, 15.9.2010, str. 6.
OJ C 291, 1.12.2009, p. 28.
UL C 291, 1.12.2009, str. 28.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 39/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 39/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 January 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 20. januarja 2011.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 40/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 40/2011
on the issue of import licences for applications submitted in the first seven days of January 2011 under the tariff quota for high-quality beef administered by Regulation (EC) No 620/2009
o izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj na podlagi zahtevkov, vloženih v prvih sedmih dneh januarja 2011 v okviru tarifne kvote za visokokakovostno goveje meso, ki se upravlja Uredba (ES) št. 620/2009
The applications for import licences submitted pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 620/2009 between 1 and 7 January 2011 exceed the quantities available.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženi v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 620/2009 med 1. in 7. januarja 2011, presegajo količine, ki so na voljo.
Import licence applications covered by the quota with order number 09.4449 and submitted between 1 and 7 January 2011 in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 620/2009, shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 84,156557 %.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja iz kvote z zaporedno številko 09.4449, vloženi med 1. in 7. januarja 2011, v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 620/2009, se pomnožijo s koeficientom dodelitve 84,156557 %.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 41/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 41/2011
on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of January 2011 under tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 for poultrymeat
o izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj na podlagi zahtevkov, predloženih v prvih sedmih dnevih meseca januarja 2011 v okviru tarifnih kvot za perutninsko meso, odprtih z Uredbo (ES) št. 616/2007
The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of January 2011 for the subperiod 1 April to 30 June 2011 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available.
Količine v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženih v prvih sedmih dnevih meseca januarja 2011 za podobdobje med 1. aprilom in 30. junijem 2011, so za nekatere kvote višje od razpoložljivih količin.
The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 for the subperiod 1 April to 30 June 2011 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za količine v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja, vložena v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 616/2007 za podobdobje med 1. aprilom in 30. junijem 2011, se uporabi koeficient dodelitve iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.4.2011-30.6.2011
Koeficient dodelitve za zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja, predložene za podobdobje od 1.4.2011-30.6.2011
Commission Regulation (EU) No 42/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 42/2011
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector [2], and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 891/2009 z dne 25. septembra 2009 o odprtju in upravljanju nekaterih tarifnih kvot Skupnosti v sektorju sladkorja [2] ter zlasti člena 5(2) Uredbe,
Quantities covered by applications for import licences submitted to the competent authorities from 1 to 7 January 2011 in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009, are equal to the quantity available under order numbers 09.4317 and 09.4318.
Količine, zajete v zahtevkih za uvozna dovoljenja, ki so bili vloženi pristojnim organom od 1. do 7. januarja 2011 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 891/2009, so enake razpoložljivi količini po zaporednih številkah 09.4317 in 09.4318.
Submission of further applications for licences for order numbers 09.4317 and 09.4318 should be suspended until the end of the marketing year, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009,
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 891/2009 je treba vlaganje nadaljnjih zahtevkov za dovoljenja glede zaporednih številk 09.4317 in 09.4318 odložiti do konca tržnega leta –
Applications lodged from 1.1.2011 to 7.1.2011
Zahtevki, vloženi od 1.1.2011 do 7.1.2011
Commission Regulation (EU) No 43/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 43/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 January 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 21. januarja 2011.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 44/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 44/2011
The currently applicable refunds have been fixed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 948/2010 [3].
Trenutno veljavna nadomestila so bila določena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 948/2010 [3].
Regulation (EU) No 948/2010 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (EU) št. 948/2010 se razveljavi.
OJ L 278, 22.10.2010, p. 12.
UL L 278, 22.10.2010, str. 12.
Export refunds on milk and milk products applicable from 21 January 2011
Izvozna nadomestila za mleko in mlečne izdelke, ki se uporabljajo od 21. januarja 2011
Commission Regulation (EU) No 45/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 45/2011
In view of the current situation on the market in eggs, export refunds should be fixed in accordance with the rules and certain criteria provided for in Articles 162, 163, 164, 167 and 169 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Ob upoštevanju trenutnih razmer na trgu jajc je treba določiti izvozna nadomestila v skladu s pravili in določenimi merili iz členov 162, 163, 164, 167 in 169 Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007.
The currently applicable refunds have been fixed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 950/2010 [4].
Trenutno veljavna nadomestila so bila določena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 950/2010 [4].
The products eligible for a refund under paragraph 1 shall meet the relevant requirements of Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 and (EC) No 853/2004 and, in particular, shall be prepared in an approved establishment and comply with the marking conditions laid down in Section I of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 and those defined in point A of Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Proizvodi, ki so upravičeni do nadomestil na podlagi odstavka 1, izpolnjujejo ustrezne zahteve uredb (ES) št. 852/2004 in (ES) št. 853/2004 ter zlasti zahtevo, da so pripravljeni v odobrenem obratu v skladu z zahtevami označevanja iz oddelka I Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004 in točke A Priloge XIV k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007.
Regulation (EU) No 950/2010 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (EU) št. 950/2010 se razveljavi.
OJ L 278, 22.10.2010, p. 18.
UL L 278, 22.10.2010, str. 18.
Export refunds on eggs applicable from 21 January 2011
Izvozna nadomestila za jajca od 21. januarja 2011 dalje
NB: The product codes and the “A” series destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1).
N.B.: Tarifne oznake proizvodov in oznake namembnih krajev serije „A“ so določene v Uredbi Komisije (EGS) št. 3846/87 (UL L 366, 24.12.1987, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 46/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 46/2011
The currently applicable refunds have been fixed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 949/2010 [5].
Nadomestila, ki se trenutno uporabljajo, so bila določena z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 949/2010 [5].
The products eligible for a refund under paragraph 1 shall meet the relevant requirements of Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 and (EC) No 853/2004 and, in particular, shall be prepared in an approved establishment and comply with the health marking requirements laid down in Annex I, Section I, Chapter III to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004.
Proizvodi, upravičeni do nadomestila iz odstavka 1, morajo izpolnjevati ustrezne zahteve uredb (ES) št. 852/2004 in (ES) št. 853/2004 ter zlasti zahtevo, da so pripravljeni v odobrenem obratu in v skladu z zahtevami v zvezi z označevanjem zdravstvene ustreznosti iz poglavja III oddelka I Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 854/2004.
Regulation (EU) No 949/2010 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (EU) št. 949/2010 se razveljavi.
OJ L 278, 22.10.2010, p. 16.
UL L 278, 22.10.2010, str. 16.
Export refunds on pigmeat applicable from 21 January 2011
Izvozna nadomestila za prašičje meso od 21. januarja 2011 dalje
NB: The product codes and the ‘A’ series destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1).
Šifre proizvodov in namembnosti iz serije „A“ so navedene v Uredbi Komisije (EGS) št. 3846/87 (UL L 366, 24.12.1987, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 47/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 47/2011
to the Commission Regulation of 20 January 2011 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 20. januarja 2011 o določitvi reprezentativnih cen v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za jajčni albumin in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1484/95
Commission Regulation (EU) No 48/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 48/2011
on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 March 2011 to 31 May 2011
o izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj za česen v podobdobju od 1. marca 2011 do 31. maja 2011
The quantities for which ‘A’ licence applications have been lodged by traditional importers and by new importers during the first seven working days of January 2011, pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 exceed the quantities available for products originating in China, and all third countries other than China and Argentina.
Količine, za katere so tradicionalni uvozniki in novi uvozniki vložili zahtevke za izdajo dovoljenj „A“ v prvih sedmih dneh meseca januarja 2011 v skladu s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 341/2007, presegajo količine, ki so na voljo za proizvode s poreklom iz Kitajske in vseh tretjih držav razen Kitajske in Argentine.