natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The European Parliament adopted on 4 September 2003 [9], 22 April 2004 [10] and 6 September 2005 [11] resolutions which in principle supported the general approach of basic rules for all audiovisual media services and additional rules for television broadcasting.
Evropski parlament je 4. septembra 2003 [9], 22. aprila 2004 [10] in 6. septembra 2005 [11] sprejel resolucije, ki načeloma podpirajo splošni pristop temeljnih predpisov za vse avdiovizualne medijske storitve in dodatnih pravil za razširjanje televizijskih programov.
This Directive enhances compliance with fundamental rights and is fully in line with the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [12], in particular Article 11 thereof.
Ta direktiva krepi spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in je v celoti v skladu z načeli, ki jih priznava Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah [12], zlasti člen 11 Listine.
This Directive should not affect the obligations on Member States arising from the application of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services [13].
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na obveznosti držav članic, ki izhajajo iz uporabe Direktive 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov [13] o storitvah informacijske družbe.
Accordingly, draft national measures applicable to on-demand audiovisual media services of a stricter or more detailed nature than those which are required to simply transpose Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities [14] should be subject to the procedural obligations established pursuant to Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC.
V skladu s tem bi morale za osnutek nacionalnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo in so strožje ali natančnejše narave od tistih, ki se zahtevajo zgolj za prenos Direktive 2007/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2007 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 89/552/EGS o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov [14], veljati postopkovne obveznosti iz člena 8 Direktive 98/34/ES.
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) [15] according to its Article 1(3) is without prejudice to measures taken at Union or national level to pursue general interest objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audiovisual policy.
Direktiva 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (okvirna direktiva) [15] v skladu z njenim členom 1(3) ne posega v ukrepe, ki so sprejeti na ravni Unije ali na nacionalni ravni in katerih cilj je varstvo splošnih interesov, zlasti ne v ukrepe, ki zadevajo urejanje vsebin in avdiovizualno politiko.
This Directive does not affect the responsibility of the Member States and their authorities with regard to the organisation — including the systems of licensing, administrative authorisation or taxation — the financing and the content of programmes.
Direktiva ne vpliva na odgovornost držav članic in njihovih pristojnih organov, ki zadeva organizacijo – vključno s sistemi podeljevanja dovoljenj, upravnih pooblastil in obdavčenja – financiranje in programsko zasnovo.
The independence of cultural developments in the Member States and the preservation of cultural diversity in the Union therefore remain unaffected.
To ne zadeva neodvisnosti kulturnega dogajanja v državah članicah in ohranjanja kulturne raznolikosti znotraj Unije.
Its scope should be limited to services as defined by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and therefore should cover any form of economic activity, including that of public service enterprises, but should not cover activities which are primarily non-economic and which are not in competition with television broadcasting, such as private websites and services consisting of the provision or distribution of audiovisual content generated by private users for the purposes of sharing and exchange within communities of interest.
Vendar bi moralo biti njeno področje uporabe omejeno na storitve, kakor so opredeljene s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije, in bi zato moralo zajemati katero koli obliko gospodarskih dejavnosti, vključno z dejavnostmi podjetij za javne storitve, vendar ne bi smelo zajemati dejavnosti, ki so v osnovi negospodarske in ki ne konkurirajo razširjanju televizijskih programov, npr. zasebna spletna mesta in storitve zagotavljanja ali distribucije avdiovizualnih vsebin, ki jih proizvajajo uporabniki za namene skupne uporabe in izmenjave znotraj interesnih skupnosti.
That definition should exclude all services the principal purpose of which is not the provision of programmes, i.e. where any audiovisual content is merely incidental to the service and not its principal purpose.
Ta opredelitev bi morala izključevati vse storitve, katerih glavni namen ni zagotavljanje programov, tj. kadar je avdiovizualna vsebina le naključno povezana s storitvijo in ni njen glavni namen.
For the purposes of this Directive, the term ‘audiovisual’ should refer to moving images with or without sound, thus including silent films but not covering audio transmission or radio services.
V tej direktivi bi se moral izraz „avdiovizualni“ nanašati na gibljive slike z zvokom ali brez njega; vključeval bi torej neme filme, ne pa tudi zvočnega prenosa ali radijskih storitev.
Stand-alone text-based services should not fall within the scope of this Directive, which should not affect the freedom of the Member States to regulate such services at national level in accordance with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Samostojne, na besedilu osnovane storitve ne bi smele soditi na področje uporabe te direktive, ki ne bi smelo posegati v svobodo držav članic, da urejajo takšne storitve na nacionalni ravni v skladu s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije.
In the light of this and in order to prevent disparities as regards free movement and competition, the concept of ‘programme’ should be interpreted in a dynamic way taking into account developments in television broadcasting.
V skladu z navedenim in da bi se preprečile neenakosti glede prostega pretoka in svobodne konkurence, bi se moral zato pojem „program“ razlagati dinamično, ob upoštevanju razvoja na področju razširjanja televizijskih programov.
The concept of editorial responsibility is essential for defining the role of the media service provider and therefore for the definition of audiovisual media services.
Pojem uredniške odgovornosti je bistven za opredelitev vloge ponudnika medijskih storitev in s tem za opredelitev avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev.
Member States may further specify aspects of the definition of editorial responsibility, notably the concept of ‘effective control’, when adopting measures to implement this Directive.
Države članice lahko v ukrepih za izvedbo te direktive podrobneje opredelijo vidike uredniške odgovornosti, zlasti pojem „učinkovitega nadzora“.
In general, for television broadcasting or television programmes which are also offered as on-demand audiovisual media services by the same media service provider, the requirements of this Directive should be deemed to be met by the fulfilment of the requirements applicable to the television broadcast, i.e. linear transmission.
Na splošno bi moralo za razširjanje televizijskih programov, ki jih isti ponudnik ponuja tudi kot avdiovizualne medijske storitve na zahtevo, veljati, da so zahteve iz te direktive izpolnjene z izpolnjevanjem zahtev, ki se uporabljajo za razširjanje televizijskih programov, tj. za linearni prenos.
All the characteristics of an audiovisual media service set out in its definition and explained in recitals 21 to 28 should be present at the same time.
Vse značilnosti avdiovizualne medijske storitve, določene v njeni opredelitvi in razložene v uvodnih izjavah 21 do 28, bi morale biti prisotne hkrati.
In the context of television broadcasting, the concept of simultaneous viewing should also cover quasi-simultaneous viewing because of the variations in the short time lag which occurs between the transmission and the reception of the broadcast due to technical reasons inherent in the transmission process.
V okviru razširjanja televizijskih programov bi moral pojem sočasno gledanje zajemati tudi navidezno sočasno gledanje, in sicer zaradi razlik v kratkem časovnem zamiku, ki nastane med prenašanjem in sprejemanjem televizijskih programov iz tehničnih razlogov, značilnih za postopek prenosa.
A wide definition of audiovisual commercial communication should be laid down in this Directive, which should not however include public service announcements and charity appeals broadcast free of charge.
V tej direktivi bi bilo treba določiti širšo opredelitev avdiovizualnih komercialnih sporočil, ki pa kljub temu ne bi smela vključevati brezplačnega prenosa oglaševanja javnih storitev in dobrodelnih akcij.
For the purposes of this Directive, ‘European works’ should be defined without prejudice to the possibility of Member States laying down a more detailed definition as regards media service providers under their jurisdiction, in compliance with Union law and account being taken of the objectives of this Directive.
Za namene te direktive bi bilo treba „evropska dela“ opredeliti tako, da to ne bo vplivalo na možnost držav članic, da postavijo natančnejšo opredelitev v zvezi s ponudniki medijskih storitev pod njihovo jurisdikcijo, kar je v skladu s pravom Unije, pri čemer se upoštevajo cilji te direktive.
The country of origin principle should be regarded as the core of this Directive, as it is essential for the creation of an internal market.
Načelo države izvora bi moralo biti jedro te direktive, ker je bistveno za vzpostavitev notranjega trga.
This principle should be applied to all audiovisual media services in order to ensure legal certainty for media service providers as the necessary basis for new business models and the deployment of such services.
To načelo bi se moralo uporabljati za vse avdiovizualne medijske storitve, da se vsem ponudnikom medijskih storitev zagotovi pravna varnost kot nujna osnova za nove poslovne modele in uvajanje takšnih storitev.
In order to promote a strong, competitive and integrated European audiovisual industry and enhance media pluralism throughout the Union, only one Member State should have jurisdiction over an audiovisual media service provider and pluralism of information should be a fundamental principle of the Union.
Za spodbujanje močne, konkurenčne in povezane evropske avdiovizualne industrije ter okrepitev pluralnosti medijev po vsej Uniji, bi morala biti samo ena država članica pristojna za posameznega ponudnika avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev in pluralnost informacij bi morala biti temeljno načelo Unije.
The requirement that the originating Member State should verify that broadcasts comply with national law as coordinated by this Directive is sufficient under Union law to ensure free movement of broadcasts without secondary control on the same grounds in the receiving Member States.
Zahteva, po kateri mora izvorna država članica preverjati, ali so programske vsebine skladne z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki jo usklajuje ta direktiva, glede na pravo Unije zadostuje za zagotavljanje prostega pretoka programskih vsebin in ne predvideva drugotnega nadzora iz istih razlogov v državi članici sprejemnici.
However, the receiving Member State may, exceptionally and under specific conditions, provisionally suspend the retransmission of televised broadcasts.
Država članica sme izjemoma in v posebnih okoliščinah kljub temu začasno prekiniti prenašanje televizijskih programov.
Restrictions on the free provision of on-demand audiovisual media services should only be possible in accordance with conditions and procedures replicating those already established by Article 3(4), (5) and (6) of Directive 2000/31/EC.
Omejitve brezplačne zagotovitve avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na zahtevo bi morale biti mogoče le v skladu s pogoji in postopki, ki so enaki tistim, ki so že določeni v členu 3(4), (5) in (6) Direktive 2000/31/ES.
As this Directive concerns services offered to the general public in the Union, it should apply only to audiovisual media services that can be received directly or indirectly by the public in one or more Member States with standard consumer equipment.
Ker ta direktiva zadeva storitve, zagotovljene splošni javnosti v Uniji, bi se morala uporabljati le za avdiovizualne medijske storitve, do katerih lahko javnost dostopa neposredno ali posredno s standardno potrošniško opremo v več državah članicah.
The definition of ‘standard consumer equipment’ should be left to the competent national authorities.
Opredelitev pojma „standardne potrošniške opreme“ bi bilo treba prepustiti pristojnim nacionalnim organom.
Articles 49 to 55 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union lay down the fundamental right to freedom of establishment.
Členi 49 do 55 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije določajo temeljno pravico do svobode ustanavljanja.
Member States should be able to apply more detailed or stricter rules in the fields coordinated by this Directive to media service providers under their jurisdiction, while ensuring that those rules are consistent with general principles of Union law.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da na področjih, ki jih usklajuje ta direktiva, za ponudnike avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev v svoji pristojnosti uporabijo podrobnejša ali strožja pravila, pri tem pa zagotovijo, da so ta pravila v skladu s splošnimi načeli prava Unije.
The concept of rules of general public interest has been developed by the Court of Justice in its case-law in relation to Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty (now Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) and includes, inter alia, rules on the protection of consumers, the protection of minors and cultural policy.
Pojem pravil splošnega javnega interesa je oblikovalo Sodišče v svoji sodni praksi v zvezi s členoma 43 in 49 Pogodbe ES (sedaj člena 49 in 56 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije) in med drugim zajema pravila o varstvu potrošnikov, varstvu mladoletnikov in kulturni politiki.
The Member State requesting cooperation should ensure that the specific national rules in question are objectively necessary, applied in a non-discriminatory manner and proportionate.
Država članica, ki zahteva sodelovanje, bi morala zagotoviti, da so posebna nacionalna pravila objektivno potrebna, se uporabljajo na nediskriminatoren način in so sorazmerna.
Under this Directive, notwithstanding the application of the country of origin principle, Member States may still take measures that restrict freedom of movement of television broadcasting, but only under the conditions and following the procedure laid down in this Directive.
V skladu s to direktivo, ne glede na uporabo načela države izvora, lahko države članice še naprej sprejemajo ukrepe, ki omejujejo prost pretok razširjanja televizijskih programov, vendar le pod pogoji in v skladu s postopkom, določenimi v tej direktivi.
In its Communication to the European Parliament and to the Council on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union, the Commission stressed that a careful analysis of the appropriate regulatory approach is necessary, in particular, in order to establish whether legislation is preferable for the relevant sector and problem, or whether alternatives such as co-regulation or self-regulation should be considered.
V Sporočilu Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o bolje oblikovanih predpisih za rast in delovna mesta v Evropski uniji je Komisija poudarila, da je treba predvideti podrobno analizo o ustreznem pristopu oblikovanja predpisov, zlasti glede tega, ali je za zadevni sektor in problem primernejša zakonodaja ali druge možnosti, kakršne so koregulacija ali samoregulacija.
Furthermore, experience has shown that both co-regulation and self-regulation instruments, implemented in accordance with the different legal traditions of the Member States, can play an important role in delivering a high level of consumer protection.
Poleg tega so izkušnje pokazale, da imajo lahko tako instrumenti koregulacije kakor tudi samoregulacije v skladu z raznimi pravnimi tradicijami držav članic pomembno vlogo pri doseganju visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov.
Without prejudice to formal obligations of the Member States regarding transposition, this Directive encourages the use of co-regulation and self-regulation.
Brez poseganja v formalne obveznosti držav članic v zvezi s prenosom ta direktiva spodbuja uporabo koregulacije in samoregulacije.
This should neither oblige Member States to set up co-regulation and/or self-regulatory regimes nor disrupt or jeopardise current co-regulation or self-regulatory initiatives which are already in place within Member States and which are working effectively.
To ne obvezuje držav članic niti k vzpostavitvi koregulativnih in/ali samoregulativnih ureditev niti ne posega ali ogroža sedanjih koregulativnih ali samoregulativnih pobud, ki so že vzpostavljene v državah članicah in učinkovito delujejo.
It is for each Member State to decide the practical details as to how this objective can be achieved without prejudice to any other relevant provisions of Union law.
Vsaka država članica določi praktične podrobnosti o načinu izpolnjevanja tega cilja brez poseganja v katere koli druge ustrezne določbe prava Unije.
The right of persons with a disability and of the elderly to participate and be integrated in the social and cultural life of the Union is inextricably linked to the provision of accessible audiovisual media services.
Pravica invalidov in starejših oseb do udeležbe v kulturnem in družbenem življenju Unije je neločljivo povezana z zagotavljanjem dostopnih avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev.
‘Media literacy’ refers to skills, knowledge and understanding that allow consumers to use media effectively and safely.
„Medijska pismenost“ se nanaša na spretnosti, znanje in razumevanje, ki uporabnikom omogočajo učinkovito in varno rabo medijev.
The Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the protection of minors and human dignity and on the right of reply in relation to the competitiveness of the European audiovisual and on-line information services industry [20] already contains a series of possible measures for promoting media literacy such as, for example, continuing education of teachers and trainers, specific Internet training aimed at children from a very early age, including sessions open to parents, or organisation of national campaigns aimed at citizens, involving all communications media, to provide information on using the Internet responsibly.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o varstvu mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva ter o pravici do odgovora v zvezi s konkurenčnostjo evropske avdiovizualne industrije in industrije spletnih informacijskih storitev [20] že vsebuje sklop možnih ukrepov za spodbujanje medijske pismenosti, kakor je denimo trajno izobraževanje učiteljev in mentorjev, posebno poučevanje o internetu za otroke že od malega naprej, vključno z odprtimi učnimi urami za starše, ali organiziranje nacionalnih kampanj za državljane, ki vključujejo vsa komunikacijska sredstva, da se zagotovijo informacije o odgovorni uporabi interneta.
Television broadcasting rights for events of high interest to the public may be acquired by broadcasters on an exclusive basis.
Izdajatelji televizijskega programa lahko pridobijo ekskluzivne pravice za televizijsko razširjanje dogodkov velikega javnega interesa.
However, it is essential to promote pluralism through the diversity of news production and programming across the Union and to respect the principles recognised by Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Kljub temu je nujno treba spodbujati pluralnost z različno produkcijo in pripravo informativnih oddaj v Uniji ter spoštovati načela iz člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
It is essential that Member States should be able to take measures to protect the right to information and to ensure wide access by the public to television coverage of national or non-national events of major importance for society, such as the Olympic Games, the football World Cup and the European football championship.
Bistvenega pomena je, da države članice lahko sprejmejo ukrepe, s katerimi bi zaščitile pravico do obveščenosti in širši javnosti zagotovile dostop do televizijskega spremljanja nacionalnih in nenacionalnih dogodkov velikega družbenega pomena, kot so denimo olimpijske igre, svetovno nogometno prvenstvo in evropsko nogometno prvenstvo.
To this end, Member States retain the right to take measures compatible with Union law aimed at regulating the exercise by broadcasters under their jurisdiction of exclusive broadcasting rights to such events.
Države članice si v ta namen ohranjajo pravico do sprejemanja ukrepov, skladnih s pravom Unije, ki so namenjeni reguliranju izvrševanja ekskluzivnih pravic televizijskega razširjanja takšnih dogodkov s strani izdajateljev televizijskih programov pod njihovo sodno pristojnostjo.
It is necessary to make arrangements within a Union framework, in order to avoid potential legal uncertainty and market distortions and to reconcile the free circulation of television services with the need to prevent the possibility of circumvention of national measures protecting a legitimate general interest.
Zato da bi se izognili morebitnim pravnim nejasnostim in tržnemu izkrivljanju ter uredili prosti pretok televizijskih storitev, je treba sprejeti dogovore v okviru Unije, pri čemer je treba upoštevati potrebo po preprečevanju možnosti, da bi obšli nacionalne ukrepe za zaščito zakonitih splošnih interesov.
In particular, it is appropriate to lay down provisions concerning the exercise by broadcasters of exclusive broadcasting rights that they may have purchased to events considered to be of major importance for society in a Member State other than that having jurisdiction over the broadcasters.
Še zlasti je ustrezno, da se oblikujejo določbe v zvezi z izvrševanjem ekskluzivnih pravic televizijskega razširjanja, ki so jih izdajatelji televizijskih programov morda kupili v zvezi z dogodki, ki jim pripisujemo velik družbeni pomen, v državi članici, ki nima sodne pristojnosti nad temi izdajatelji.
In order to avoid speculative rights purchases with a view to circumvention of national measures, it is necessary to apply those provisions to contracts entered into after the publication of Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [21] and concerning events which take place after the date of implementation.
Zato da bi preprečili špekulativni nakup pravic zaradi izogibanja nacionalnim ukrepom, je nujno, da se te določbe uporabljajo za pogodbe, sklenjene po objavi Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/36/ES [21], ki se nanašajo na dogodke, organizirane po datumu izvedbe.
When contracts that predate the publication of that Directive are renewed, they are considered to be new contracts.
Kadar so pogodbe, sklenjene pred datumom objave omenjene direktive, obnovljene, takšne pogodbe veljajo za nove pogodbe.