natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The complainant contested these statements of the exporting producer and claimed that contrary to what has been claimed, it follows from the proceedings in the USA that there is a clear dividing line distinguishing web rolls from CFP.
Pritožnik je tem trditvam proizvajalca izvoznika ugovarjal in trdil, da je v nasprotju s trditvami postopek v ZDA pokazal, da obstaja jasna ločnica, ki loči zvitke za rotacijsko tiskanje od PFP.
Firstly, it should be noted that the statements referred to by the exporting producer were presented in investigations under other jurisdictions and by different parties than the ones in the current proceedings and thus are not relevant.
Prvič, opozoriti je treba, da so bile trditve, na katere se je skliceval proizvajalec izvoznik, predložene v preiskavah v drugih sodnih sistemih, predložile pa jih niso iste strani, kot sodelujejo v tem postopku, zaradi česar niso pomembne.
Secondly, the US authorities in the mentioned investigations concluded that there was a clear distinction between on one hand CFP used in sheet-fed printing and on the other hand rolls suitable for use in web-fed printing.
Drugič, organi ZDA so v omenjenih preiskavah sklenili, da obstaja jasna razlika med PFP, ki se uporablja v formatnem tiskanju, in zvitki, ki so primerni za rotacijsko tiskanje.
Cutter rolls were regarded as semi-finished products while rolls suitable for web fed printing were not considered as product concerned.
Zvitki za rezalnike so bili obravnavani kot polizdelki, zvitki, primerni za rotacijsko tiskanje, pa se niso šteli za zadevni izdelek.
The US authorities did not explicitly define web rolls in their definition of the product scope.
Organi ZDA v svoji opredelitvi obsega izdelkov v preiskavi zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje niso izrecno opredelili.
For this reason, the criterion of resistance to picking was not relevant in the definition of the product scope in the mentioned investigations.
Zaradi tega merilo odpornosti proti trganju v omenjenih preiskavah ni bilo pomembno pri opredelitvi obsega izdelkov.
Based on the above comments, the technical characteristic ‘resistance to picking’ was confirmed as being a reliable characteristic to describe CFP suitable for use in web-fed printing.
Na podlagi navedenih pripomb je bila tehnična lastnost „odpornost proti trganju“ potrjena kot zanesljiva lastnost za opredelitev PFP, primeren za uporabo v rotacijskem tiskanju.
The comments put forward have however also revealed that there exist web rolls that can be used in web-fed printing even if they do not fully meet all the criteria for resistance to picking.
Predložene pripombe pa so tudi pokazale, da obstajajo zvitki za rotacijsko tiskanje, ki se lahko uporabljajo za rotacijsko tiskanje tudi, če ne izpolnjujejo v celoti vseh meril glede odpornosti proti trganju.
For this reason it was considered necessary to further refine the definition of rolls suitable for web-fed printing.
Zato se je zdelo potrebno natančneje opredeliti zvitke, primerne za rotacijsko tiskanje.
In order to provide a further criterion to distinguish web rolls which do not fully meet all the criteria for resistance to picking, the complainant suggested that a roll which does not fully sat the picking resistance test but has an internal core size of less than 80 mm, should be considered as a web roll.
Da bi zagotovili nadaljnje merilo za razlikovanje zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje, ki vseh meril ne izpolnjujejo v celoti, je pritožnik predlagal, da bi bilo treba zvitek, ki preskusa glede odpornosti proti trganju ne prestane v celoti, vendar je njegovo notranje jedro manjše od 80 mm, šteti za zvitek za rotacijsko tiskanje.
The GOC and the exporting producer claimed that the addition of core size as a new element into the product definition constituted a revision of the definition of web rolls and thus the product concerned.
Kitajska vlada in proizvajalec izvoznik sta trdila, da je dodajanje velikosti jedra kot novega elementa k opredelitvi izdelka popravek opredelitve zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje in zato tudi zadevnega izdelka.
It also claimed that the internal core size is not a suitable criterion as there exist web rolls with higher than 80 mm core size and cutter rolls with lower than 80 mm core size.
Trdila sta tudi, da velikost notranjega jedra ni ustrezno merilo, saj obstajajo zvitki za rotacijsko tiskanje s premerom jedra več kot 80 mm ter zvitki za rezalnike s premerom jedra manj kot 80 mm.
The Commission endeavoured to further refine the definition of rolls suitable for use in web-fed printing and to give further clarification in order to distinguish even more clearly between the product concerned and other products, also with a view to minimize the possibility of circumvention of the measures.
Komisija si je prizadevala natančneje opredeliti zvitke, primerne za rotacijsko tiskanje, ter zagotoviti dodatna pojasnila za še jasnejše razlikovanje med zadevnim izdelkom in drugimi izdelki, tudi da bi čim bolj omejila možnost izogibanja ukrepom.
The evidence submitted on the suitability of the core size as an alternative criterion in the definition however proved that this criterion would lead to the possible exclusion of product concerned, i.e. cutter rolls with a core size of less than 80 mm from the measures.
Vendar so dokazi, predloženi glede primernosti velikosti jedra kot alternativnega merila za opredelitev, potrdili, da bi to merilo morda povzročilo izključitev zadevnega izdelka, tj. zvitkov za rezalnike s premerom jedra manj kot 80 mm, iz ukrepov.
Therefore this criterion to define rolls suitable for use in web-fed printing was abandoned.
Zato je bilo za opredelitev zvitkov, primernih za rotacijsko tiskanje, to merilo opuščeno.
The above is without prejudice to the reliability of the method according to which rolls suitable for use in web-fed printing have been excluded from the scope of the investigation as it was claimed by the Chinese group of exporting producers.
Navedeno ne posega v zanesljivost metode, v skladu s katero so bili zvitki, primerni za rotacijsko tiskanje, izključeni iz obsega preiskave, kot je trdila kitajska skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
During the course of the investigation, certain parties also claimed that multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard,as defined in the recital (47),should be excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Med preiskavo so nekatere strani trdile tudi, da bi bilo treba iz obsega preiskave izključiti večplastni papir in večplastni karton, kot sta opredeljena v uvodni izjavi (47).
They claimed that multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard had different physical characteristics such as multiple plies, higher stiffness and lower density and that the final use of these products was different as these are usually used for folding carton and packaging applications.
Trdile so, da imata večplastni papir in večplastni karton drugačne fizikalne lastnosti, na primer več slojev, večjo trdoto in manjšo gostoto, ter da je končna uporaba teh izdelkov drugačna, saj se navadno uporabljajo za kartonske zloženke in embalažo.
The investigation showed that multi-ply paper and paperboard have indeed some different physical and technical characteristics; more specifically they are composed of several layers of pulp, which increases rigidity.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imata večplastni papir in karton res nekaj drugačnih fizikalnih in tehničnih lastnosti; še posebej ker sta sestavljena iz več plasti kaše, kar jima daje večjo togost.
Multi-ply paper and paperboard are produced by a different production method requiring a different paper machine than the one used for the production of CFP, as in the production process several layers of pulp are layered into a single product.
Večplastni papir in karton se proizvajata z drugačno proizvodno metodo, ki zahteva drugačne papirniške stroje kot metoda, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo PFP, saj se v proizvodnem procesu več plasti kaše stisne v enoten izdelek.
Finally, multi-ply paper and paperboard serve different purposes (mainly packaging) compared to CFP, which is used for high quality printing of promotional material, magazines, etc. Multi-ply paper and paperboard as defined in recital (47) is therefore considered as not being the product concerned.
Nazadnje, večplastni papir in karton se uporabljata za drugačne namene (v glavnem za embalažo) kot PFP, ki se uporablja za visokokakovostno tiskanje promocijskega gradiva, revij itd. Večplastni papir in karton, kot sta opredeljena v uvodni izjavi (47) se zato ne štejeta za zadevni izdelek.
Consequently, the CN codes mentioned covering imports of multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard are excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Posledično se navedene oznake KN, ki pokrivajo uvoz večplastnega papirja in večplastnega kartona, izločijo iz obsega preiskave.
It is also noted that, as outlined in recital (16), all CFP with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 were explicitly included in the definition of the product concerned.
Ugotovljeno je tudi, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (16), da so bili vsi PFP z maso med 70 g/m2 in 400 g/m2 izrecno vključeni v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
Therefore paperboard is considered as being ‘the product concerned’.
Zato se karton šteje za zadevni izdelek.
The product concerned, the product produced and sold on the domestic market of the PRC as well as the product manufactured and sold in the Union by the Union producers were found to have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imajo zadevni izdelek, izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu LRK, in izdelek, ki ga proizvajalci Unije proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu Unije, enake fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter uporabe.
They are therefore considered as ‘alike’ within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ti izdelki obravnavajo kot podobni izdelki v smislu člena 2(c) osnovne uredbe.
SAMPLING FOR EXPORTING PRODUCERS IN THE PRC
VZORČENJE ZA PROIZVAJALCE IZVOZNIKE V LRK
Two out of four related exporting producers of the APP group were found to produce only multi-ply paperboard referred to in recital (47) above.
Za dva od štirih povezanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz skupine AAP je bilo ugotovljeno, da proizvajata samo večplastni karton, omenjen v uvodni izjavi (47).
In this respect it is recalled that it was concluded that multi-ply paperboard should be excluded from the product scope of the current investigation.
V zvezi s tem je treba spomniti, da je bilo sklenjeno, da se večplastni karton izključi iz obsega sedanje preiskave.
It is also recalled that the multi-ply paperboard was excluded from the product scope of the parallel anti-dumping proceedings.
Spomniti je treba tudi, da je bil večplastni karton izključen iz obsega vzporednega protidampinškega postopka.
It is therefore concluded that the two related exporting producers found to produce only multi-ply paperboard are not concerned by the current proceedings.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da dveh povezanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, za katera je bilo ugotovljeno, da proizvajata samo večplastni karton, sedanji postopek ne zadeva.
Thus the findings presented in this Regulation are not based on their information and data.
Zato ugotovitve, predstavljene v nadaljevanju, ne temeljijo na njunih informacijah in podatkih.
SAMPLING OF UNION PRODUCERS
VZORČENJE PROIZVAJALCEV UNIJE
In view of the potentially large number of Union producers, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na morebitno veliko število proizvajalcev Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku postopka predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
Those four producers were considered to be representative (covering 61 % of total production) of the Union industry as defined in recital (372).
Ti štirje proizvajalci (ki so pokrivali 61 % skupne proizvodnje) so se šteli kot reprezentativni za industrijo Unije, kot je opredeljena v uvodni izjavi (372).
The information provided by the four companies was verified on-the-spot and was used for the micro indicators as explained in recital (386).
Informacije, ki so jih predložile te štiri družbe, so bile preverjene na kraju samem in so se uporabile kot mikrokazalniki, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (386).
SAMPLING OF UNRELATED IMPORTERS
VZORČENJE NEPOVEZANIH UVOZNIKOV
In view of the potentially large number of importers, sampling was envisaged for importers in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na morebitno veliko število uvoznikov je bilo v obvestilu o začetku postopka predvideno vzorčenje za uvoznike v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
However, after examination of the information submitted and given by the small number of importers which indicated their willingness to co-operate, it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
Vendar je bilo po proučitvi predloženih informacij in glede na majhno število uvoznikov, ki so pokazali pripravljenost za sodelovanje, odločeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
It is recalled that both the GOC and the four Chinese exporting producers submitted replies to the questionnaire and accepted on-the-spot visits in order to verify the replies.
Spomniti je treba, da so kitajska vlada in štirje kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike in privolili v preverjanje odgovorov na kraju samem.
With respect to the GOC, following the submission of the reply to the questionnaire, the Commission sent to the Chinese side three deficiency letters and a pre-verification letter.
V zvezi s kitajsko vlado je Komisija po predložitvi izpolnjenega vprašalnika kitajski strani poslala tri pozive k dopolnitvi in predpreveritveno pismo.
The Commission provided to the GOC ample time for the preparation and submission of its representations whenever this was requested and justified.
Komisija je kitajski vladi zagotovila dovolj časa za pripravo in predložitev pripomb, kadar je bilo to zahtevano in utemeljeno.
Indeed substantial deadline extensions were granted to the GOC, i.e. two weeks extension for the reply to the questionnaire which led to a total deadline of 49 days for the submission of the reply to the questionnaire and three weeks for the reply to the first deficiency letter which led to a total deadline of 40 days.
Kitajski vladi so bila dejansko odobrena precejšnja podaljšanja rokov, tj. dva tedna podaljšanja za odgovor na vprašalnik, tako da je bil skupni rok za predložitev izpolnjenega vprašalnika 49 dni, in tri tedne za odgovor na prvi poziv k dopolnitvi, za kar je bil skupni rok 40 dni.
Prior to the on-the-spot verification visit, the GOC requested the Commission to provide further information in writing, in particular a list of all the questions that it intended to ask during the verification plus a list of the Government departments which were expected to participate in the on-the-spot verification visit.
Pred preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem je kitajska vlada od Komisije zahtevala, da pisno zagotovi nadaljnje informacije, zlasti seznam vseh vprašanj, ki jih namerava zastaviti med preveritvenim obiskom, in seznam vseh ministrstev, ki naj bi sodelovala pri preveritvenih obiskih.
In the absence of these, it was argued that the Commission would not fulfil its obligations as an investigating authority set out in the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (‘SCM Agreement’) and in particular those contained in paragraph 8 of Annex VI.
Če Komisija tega ne bi storila, je kitajska vlada trdila, da Komisija kot preiskovalni organ ne bi izpolnila svojih obveznosti iz Sporazuma o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih („Sporazum SIU“) in zlasti tistih iz odstavka 8 Priloge VI.
The GOC also submitted that due to lack of such information it would not be in a position to guarantee the outcome of the verification.
Kitajska vlada je navedla tudi, da zaradi pomanjkanja teh informacij ne bi mogla jamčiti za izid preverjanja.
The Commission respectfully disagreed with GOC's request.
Komisija se z zahtevo kitajske vlade ni strinjala.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission has fulfilled all the relevant conditions of paragraph 8 of Annex VI of the SCM Agreement as well as of Article 26 of the basic Regulation.
Pri tem je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija izpolnila vse ustrezne pogoje iz odstavka 8 Priloge VI Sporazuma SIU in člena 26 osnovne uredbe.
A detailed pre-verification letter was sent to the GOC confirming the agenda (days and group of schemes to be discussed per verification day) and requesting the presence of the authorities responsible for the relevant schemes and of the officials involved in the preparation of the GOC submissions.
Kitajski vladi je bilo poslano podrobno predpreveritveno pismo, s katerim je bil potrjen časovni okvir (dnevi in skupine shem, ki se bodo obravnavale na določen preveritveni dan) ter zahtevana prisotnost organov, pristojnih za ustrezne sheme, in uradnikov, ki so sodelovali pri pripravi stališč kitajske vlade.
The Commission also explained before the on-the-spot verification visits that only the GOC knows the authorities responsible for the schemes under investigation as well as those officials whose are best placed to take part in the verification and answer questions.
Komisija je pred preveritvenimi obiski na kraju samem tudi pojasnila, da je kitajska vlada edina, ki ve, kateri so organi, pristojni za preiskovane sheme, in uradniki, najprimernejši za sodelovanje pri preverjanju in odgovarjanje na vprašanja.
As regards the list of specific questions, the Commission explained before and during the on-the-spot verification visit that such a list is not required by WTO or EU legislation and that the purpose of the investigation is to verify the GOC reply to the questionnaire and the relevant supplementary submissions; therefore the verification would follow the structure of those documents.
Glede seznama določenih vprašanj je Komisija pred preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem in med njim pojasnila, da zakonodaja STO in EU tega ne zahtevata in da je namen te preiskave preveriti odgovor kitajske vlade na vprašalnik in ustrezna dopolnilna stališča; zato bi preverjanje sledilo zasnovi teh dokumentov.
The Commission would also seek to obtain and clarify further information necessary for the ongoing proceedings, but precise questions in this context would depend on the GOC's replies to the initial verification of its replies.
Komisija bi prav tako želela pridobiti in pojasniti nadaljnje informacije, potrebne za preiskavo v teku, vendar bi bila natančna vprašanja s tem v zvezi odvisna od odgovorov kitajske vlade na začetno preverjanje njenih odgovorov na vprašalnik.
It was also made clear to the GOC before the on-the-spot verification visit that refusals to provide necessary information or to assist the investigating authority in verifying information and data deemed necessary for the purposes of the proceedings may seriously undermine the investigation process.
Kitajski vladi je bilo pred preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem pojasnjeno tudi, da lahko zavračanje predložitve zahtevanih informacij ali pomoči preiskovalnemu organu pri preverjanju informacij in podatkov, potrebnih za namene preiskave, resno ogrozi postopek preiskave.
The GOC was also reminded of the consequences of the provisions of Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Kitajska vlada je bila opozorjena tudi na učinke določb člena 28 osnovne uredbe.
During the on-the-spot verification visit to the Chinese Ministry of Commerce in Beijing, the Commission endeavoured to verify information provided on the basis of the supporting documents that were used to prepare the GOC's response, in line with the provisions of Articles 11 and 26 of the basic Regulation.
Med preveritvenim obiskom kitajskega ministrstva za gospodarstvo v Pekingu si je Komisija prizadevala, da bi v skladu z določbami členov 11 in 26 osnovne uredbe preverila informacije, ki so bile zagotovljene na podlagi podporne dokumentacije, uporabljene za pripravo odgovora kitajske vlade.
In doing so, the Commission came to the preliminary conclusion that the lack of information and supporting documents available did not allow a proper verification of the reply to the questionnaire.
Pri tem je Komisija predhodno prišla do zaključka, da zaradi pomanjkanja informacij in na podlagi podporne dokumentacije, ki je na voljo, ni mogoče ustrezno preveriti odgovora na vprašalnik.
Moreover, certain information was not submitted at all although it was specifically requested, and certain questions had not been answered.
Poleg tega določene informacije sploh niso bile predložene, čeprav so bile izrecno zahtevane, in na določena vprašanja sploh ni bilo odgovorjeno.
The GOC has been made aware of the consequences of non-cooperation in accordance with Article 28(1) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Kitajska vlada je bila seznanjena s posledicami nesodelovanja v skladu s členom 28(1) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
The GOC argued that the investigating authority should determine the necessity of information in a reasonable manner that would not amount to abuse of rights.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da bi moral preiskovalni organ ugotoviti nujnost informacij na razumen način, ki ne bi pomenil zlorabe pravic.
It was also argued that even if information is considered not ideal in all aspects it should not be disregarded.
Trdila je tudi, da bi bilo treba informacije, tudi če se jih v vseh pogledih ne šteje za popolne, kljub temu upoštevati.
On the basis of the above arguments the GOC submitted that it cooperated to the best of its ability and that its reply to the questionnaire was complete.
Na podlagi navedenih trditev je kitajska vlada navedla, da je sodelovala po najboljših zmožnostih in da je bil njen vprašalnik v celoti izpolnjen.
It was also argued that the on-the-spot verification was poorly scheduled as the pre-verification letter failed to provide a reasonable understanding of what was to be verified and the Commission did not conduct specific on-the-spot visits at each government entity.
Trdila je tudi, da je bilo preverjanje na kraju samem slabo načrtovano, saj predpreveritveno pismo ni omogočilo ustreznega razumevanja glede tega, kaj bo preverjeno, in Komisija ni izvedla posebnih obiskov na kraju samem pri vsaki vladni službi.
It was also submitted that the Commission imposed an unreasonable burden on the GOC and requested irrelevant and unnecessary information.
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da je Komisija kitajski vladi naložila nerazumno dokazno breme ter zahtevala nepomembne in nepotrebne informacije.
With respect to the scheduling of the on-the-spot verification, it is recalled that the GOC agreed to the timing, the schedule of visit and the venue.
Glede načrtovanja preverjanja na kraju samem je treba spomniti, da se je kitajska vlada strinjala s časovno razporeditvijo, časovnim okvirom obiska in krajem.
Indeed, discussions on the timing of the on-the-spot visit took place in August 2010.
Dejansko so razprave o časovni razporeditvi potekale avgusta 2010.
With respect to the information requested, it is noted that the GOC has never disputed the format of the questionnaire or the way information was requested.
Glede zahtevanih informacij je treba opozoriti, da kitajska vlada nikdar ni oporekala obliki vprašalnika ali načinu, kako so bile informacije zahtevane.
The Chinese Ministry of Commerce submitted the reply to the questionnaire and subsequent representations on behalf of the GOC.
Kitajsko ministrstvo za gospodarstvo je v imenu kitajske vlade predložilo svoj izpolnjen vprašalnik in nadaljnja stališča.
The Commission requested information that was deemed necessary for the purposes of arriving at a representative finding and remained consistent in its requests by asking for the same data and information during the investigating process and requesting the GOC to explain the information submitted and the implications of that information for the schemes under investigation.
Komisija je zahtevala informacije, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za reprezentativno ugotovitev, in je bila dosledna pri svojih zahtevah, ko je med postopkom preiskave zahtevala iste podatke in informacije ter zahtevala od kitajske vlade, da pojasni predložene informacije in njihovo povezavo s preiskovanimi shemami.