natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For example, Law No 80-495 of 2 July 1980 relating to the conversion of the Service d’exploitation des tabacs et allumettes into a national company; Article 1 of Law No 96-660 of 26 July 1996 relating to the national undertaking France Télécom: ‘The legal entity governed by ordinary law France Télécom, referred to in Article 1, shall be converted as from 31 December 1996 into a national undertaking to be known as France Télécom, more than half of whose share capital shall be held directly by the State’; ‘The assets, rights and obligations of the publicly owned legal entity France Télécom shall be transferred ipso jure, as per 31 December 1996, to the national undertaking France Télécom’.
Na primer zakon št. 80-495 z dne 2. julija 1980 o preoblikovanju Service d’exploitation des tabacs et allumettes v nacionalno družbo; zakon št. 96-660 z dne 26. julija 1996 o nacionalnem podjetju France Télécom, člen 1: „Pravna oseba javnega prava France Télécom, navedena v členu 1, se z 31. decembrom 1996 preoblikuje v nacionalno podjetje, imenovano France Télécom,v katerem je država neposredna lastnica več kot polovice kapitala.“„Premoženje, pravice in obveznosti pravne osebe javnega prava France Télécom se z 31. decembrom 1996 polnopravno prenesejo na nacionalno podjetje France Télécom“.
This procedure is obviously the only conceivable one when the service concerned is a state service that is supplied with an additional budget and that is ‘converted’ into a company governed by private law.
Ta postopek je očitno edini, ki ga je mogoče izvesti, kadar se v družbo zasebnega prava „preoblikuje“ državna služba z dodatnim proračunom.
Article 1 of Law No 93-1419 of 31 December 1993 relating to the Imprimerie nationale: ‘All of the rights, assets and obligations of the State relating to the tasks of the departments concerned with the additional budget of the Imprimerie nationale shall be transferred to a national company to be known as Imprimerie nationale’; more recently, Article 78 of the amending Finance Law for 2001, No 2001-1276 of 28 December 2001, converting the DCN national service into a public limited company and transferring to it the rights, assets and obligations of the State that relate to the service.
Zakon št. 93-1419 z dne 31. decembra 1993 o Imprimerie nationale, člen 1: „Vse pravice, premoženje in obveznosti države, povezani z nalogami služb, ki spadajo v dodatni proračun Imprimerie nationale, se prenesejo na nacionalno družbo, imenovano, Imprimerie nationale“; nedavno člen 78 zakona št. 2001-1276 z dne 28. decembra 2001 o spremembi zakona o financah za leto 2001, s katerim je bila služba z nacionalno pristojnostjo DCN preoblikovana v delniško družbo in so bili nanjo preneseni pravice, premoženje in obveznosti države, povezani s službo.
The same procedure was used for Aéroports de Paris (ADP) through Article 1 of Law No 2005-357 of 20 April 2005 relating to airports: ‘The publicly owned establishment Aéroports de Paris shall be converted into a public limited company.
Enak postopek je za ADP določen z zakonom št. 2005-357 z dne 20. aprila 2005 o letališčih, člen 1: „Oseba javnega prava Aéroports de Pariz se preoblikuje v delniško družbo.
This conversion entails neither the creation of a new legal entity, nor consequences for the legal arrangements to which the staff are subject’.
To preoblikovanje ne vključuje niti ustanovitve nove pravne osebe niti posledice za pravno ureditev, ki velja za osebje“.
See S. Carpi-Petit, Les successions en droit administratif, cited above, p. 207.
Glej S. Carpi-Petit, Les successions en droit administratif (Nasledstva v upravnem pravu), navedeno zgoraj, str. 207.
See footnote 61.
Glej opombo 61.
Joined Cases T-204/97 and T-270/97 EPAC v Commission [2000] ECR II-2267, paragraphs 80 and 81.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje v združenih zadevah EPAC proti Komisiji (T-204/97 in T-270/97, Recueil, str. II-2267, točki 80 in 81).
The financial rating is a required step for obtaining funding for undertakings on the capital markets; in addition, it is increasingly used as a benchmark for bank lending.
Bonitetna ocena je obvezna pot za financiranje podjetij na kapitalskih trgih; poleg tega se vse bolj uporablja kot referenca za bančna posojila.
In this regard, see footnote 46 to the opening decision.
V zvezi s tem glej opombo 46 v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
Standard & Poor's and Fitch, two of the leading global rating agencies.
To sta Standard & Poor’s in Fitch, najpomembnejši bonitetni agenciji na svetovni ravni.
Extract from ‘Ratings direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007. Original in English.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „In 1991, LP – previously part of the government bureaucracy – became an independent publicly owned entity with EP status, which ensures LP an ultimate state guarantee on its obligations, but not a timely and explicit guarantee as reflected by the rating differentiation between LP and the Republic of France.“
Second and fourth indents of Point 1.2 of the 2008 Guarantees Notice.
Glej točko 1.2, druga in četrta alinea, obvestila o poroštvih.
See article ‘Fitch confirme la note “AA” attribuée à La Poste ’, Fitch Ratings, Paris/London, 4 September 2009.
Glej članek „Fitch confirme la note ‚AA‘ attribuée à La Poste (Agencija Fitch potrdila oceno ‚AA‘, dodeljeno podjetju La Poste) “, Fitch Ratings, Pariz/London, 4. september 2009.
See recital 2 of this Decision.
Glej uvodno izjavo 2 tega sklepa.
Extract from ‘International Postal Entities: Influence of government support on ratings’.
Izvleček iz „International Postal Entities: Influence of government support on ratings“.
La Poste’s legal status confers the ultimate statutory guarantee of the Republic of France (AAAA/Stable/A–1+) on its obligations’.
La Poste’s legal status confers the ultimate statutory guarantee of the Republic of France (AAAA/Stable/A-1+) on its obligations“.
The most recent downgrade of La Poste’s rating took place on 21 January 2009, shortly after the President of the French Republic had announced the conversion of La Poste into a public limited company: La Poste’s rating was downgraded to A+, which once again confirms that La Poste’s status as a public entity does indeed have an important influence on the rating, ceteris paribus.
Zadnjič se je ocena podjetja La Poste znižala 21. januarja 2009, kmalu zatem, ko je predsednik Francoske republike napovedal preoblikovanje podjetja La Poste v delniško družbo: ocena podjetja La Poste je bila znižana na A+, kar znova potrjuje, da status javnega subjekta podjetja La Poste dejansko pomembno vpliva na bonitetno oceno, če vse drugo sicer ostane nespremenjeno.
Extract from ‘Ratings direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007: ‘S & P continues to follow a top-down rating methodology for La Poste — which allows for a governement supported entity to be rated by up to two categories below the sovereign — as we expect the French state to remain La Poste’s 100 % shareholder in the medium term.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „S & P continues to follow a top-down rating methodology for La Poste – which allows for a governement supported entity to be rated by up to two categories below the sovereign- as we expect the French state to remain La Poste’s 100 % shareholder in the medium term.
The ratings nevertheless already factor in the long-term likelihood of a change in the group’s capital structure, which would require a change in its current ‘établissement public’ legal status and result in the loss of the state’s ultimate guarantee on LP’s financial obligations, the elimination of which was recently recommended by the European Commission ’.
The ratings nevertheless already factor in the long-term likelihood of a change in the group’s capital structure, which would require a change in its current ‚établissement public‘ legal status and result in the loss of the state’s ultimate guarantee on LP’s financial obligations, the elimination of which was recently recommended by the European Commission “.
Extract from ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007: ‘The EC recently recommended that the French government end this guarantee by year-end 2008, which they believe provides LP with more favorable financing conditions than its competitors in a market in the process of being liberalized.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „The EC recently recommended that the French government end this guarantee by year-end 2008, which they believe provides La Poste with more favorable financing conditions than its competitors in a market in the process of being liberalized.
Extract from ADP news dated 21 January 2009: ‘S & P lowers ratings on La Poste with negative outlook’ […] ‘The announced legal status and ownership change will give the company a greater autonomy from the government, which is why its rating has a four-notch differential with the rating on the Republic of France, rated AAA/A–1+ with a “stable” outlook.
Izvleček iz „ADP news“ z dne 21. januarja 2009: „S & P lowers ratings on La Poste with negative outlook“ […] „The announced legal status and ownership change will give the company a greater autonomy from the government, which is why its rating has a four-notch differential with the rating on the Republic of France, rated AAA/A-1 + with a ‚stable‘ outlook.
S & P’s “negative” outlook reflects concerns that the changes in the company’s legal status and ownership, likely to take place in the next two years as part of a capital hike, could pressure the ratings.
S & P’s ‚negative‘ outlook reflects concerns that the changes in the company’s legal status and ownership, likely to take place in the next two years as part of a capital hike, could pressure the ratings.
See point 197 of the observations submitted by France on 23 January 2008.
Glej odstavek 197 pripomb, ki jih je Francija poslala 23. januarja 2008.
See also ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007: ‘The entities’ credit standing is linked to that of the government, but ratings can be notched down from those on the State by up to two categories as the financial links between these companies and the state may be increasingly subject to change in the medium or long term’.
Glej tudi „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „The entities’ credit standing is linked to that of the government, but ratings can be notched down from those on the State by up to two categories as the financial links between these companies and the state may be increasingly subject to change in the medium or long term.“ […] (Boniteta subjektov je povezana z boniteto vlade, toda ocene se lahko znižajo za dve kategoriji, ker se lahko finančne vezi med navedenim podjetjem in državo srednjeročno ali dolgoročno spremenijo.)
Extract from ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007: Original in English.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „In 1991, La Poste became an independent publicly owned entity with Etablissement Public status, which ensures La Poste an ultimate State guarantee on its obligations, but not a timely and explicit guarantee as reflected by the rating differentiation between La Poste and the Republic of France“.
Extract from ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007. ‘The EC recently recommended that the French government end this guarantee by year-end 2008, which they believe provides LP with more favorable financing conditions than its competitors in a market in the process of being liberalized.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „The EC recently recommended that the French government end this guarantee by year-end 2008, which they believe provides La Poste with more favorable financing conditions than its competitors in a market in the process of being liberalized.
Extract from ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007: ‘A change in the group’s ownership structure would lead Standard & Poor’s to shift to a bottom-up rating approach, focusing more on LP’s stand-alone business and financial profiles.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „A change in the group’s ownership structure would lead Standard and Poor’s to shift to a bottom-up rating approach, focusing more on La Poste’s stand-alone business and financial profiles. This rating approach may not necessarily translate into rating changes given the expected improvement in La Poste’s stand-alone situation in the coming years“.
This rating approach may not necessarily translate into rating changes given the expected improvement in La Poste’s stand-alone situation in the coming years’.
(Zaradi spremembe lastniške strukture bi agencija Standard and Poor’s prešla na ocenjevanje od spodaj navzgor in se bolj osredotočila na lastni poslovni in finančni profil podjetja La Poste. Ta ocenjevalni pristop ne bi nujno spremenil ocene glede na pričakovano izboljšanje notranjega položaja podjetja La Poste v prihodnjih letih.)
Extract from ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007: ‘The ratings on La Poste could be downgraded, however, if state backing for the company were to weaken’.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „The ratings on La Poste could be downgraded, however, if state backing for the company were to weaken“. (Vendar bi se ocene podjetja La Poste lahko znižale, če bi bila državna podpora za to podjetje oslabljena.)
See section 3.2.1.D of this Decision and part V.4 of the observations submitted by the French authorities on 23 January 2008.
Glej oddelek 3.2.1.D tega sklepa in del V.4 pripomb francoskih organov, poslanih 23. januarja 2008.
Part V.4(a) of the observations submitted by France on 23 January 2008.
Del V.4(a) pripomb, ki jih je Francija poslala 23. januarja 2008.
See point 186 of the observations submitted by France on 23 January 2008.
Glej odstavek 186 pripomb, ki jih je Francija poslala 23. januarja 2008.
See Table 1 in ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007.
Glej preglednico 1 v „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007.
Extract from ‘International Postal Entities: Influence of government support on ratings’, Standard & Poor’s, 22 November 2004: ‘Unlike the credit quality of companies that operate in a commercial manner at arm’s length from the government, like SingPost, Deutsche Post or TPG, a major factor underpinning La Poste’s robust credit quality is its extremely strong state support.
Izvleček iz „International Postal Entities: Influence of government support on ratings“ Standard and Poor’s, 22. november 2004: „Unlike the credit quality of companies that operate in a commercial manner at arm’s length from the government, like SingPost, Deutsche Post or TPG, a major factor underpinning La Poste’s robust credit quality is its extremely strong State support.
See point 196 of the observations submitted by France on 23 January 2008.
Glej odstavek 196 pripomb, ki jih je Francija poslala 23. januarja 2008.
See points 198-200 of the observations submitted by France on 23 January 2008.
Glej odstavke 198 do 200 pripomb, ki jih je Francija poslala 23. januarja 2008.
‘International Postal Entities: Influence of government support on ratings’, Standard & Poor’s, 22 November 2004.
„International Postal Entities: Influence of government support on ratings“ Standard and Poor’s, 22. november 2004.
Extract from ‘Ratings Direct’ on La Poste, S & P, 3 April 2007: The ratings nevertheless already factor in the long-term likelihood of a change in the group’s capital structure, which would require a change in its current ‘établissement public’ legal status and result in the loss of the state’s ultimate guarantee on LP’s financial obligations, the elimination of which was recently recommended by the European Commission’.
Izvleček iz „Ratings direct“ o podjetju La Poste, S & P, 3. april 2007: „The ratings nevertheless already factor in the long-term likelihood of a change in the group’s capital structure, which would require a change in its current ‚établissement public‘ legal status and result in the loss of the state’s ultimate guarantee on LP’s financial obligations, the elimination of which was recently recommended by the European Commission “.
Moreover, La Poste’s identified weaknesses include: ‘Likely capital structure change at company or bank level in the long term’.
Poleg tega ugotovljene slabosti podjetja La Poste vključujejo: „Likely capital structure change at company or bank level in the long term“.
The mid swap is the median between the rate offered and the rate proposed by the banks at a particular moment for their interbank dealings by maturity, i.e. it is the fixed rate that a bank is willing to exchange for a 6-month Euribor as a general rule.
Mid swap je srednja obrestna mera med ponujeno obrestno mero in obrestno mero, ki jo banke v nekem trenutku predlagajo za svoje medbančne zamenjave po dospelosti, to je fiksna obrestna mera, ki jo je banka na splošno pripravljena zamenjati proti 6-mesečnemu euriboru.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-301/87 France v Commission, ‘Boussac’, [1990] ECR I-307, paragraph 33.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 14. februarja 1990 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (C-301/87, Recueil, str. I-307, točka 33), imenovana „sodba Boussac“.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-354/05 TF1 v Commission [2009] ECR II-471, paragraphs 166 and 167.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 11. marca 2009 v zadevi TF1 proti Komisiji (T-354/05, ZOdl., str. II-113, točki 166 in 167).
In particular, in its decision on EDF (paragraph 57 of the Commission Decision 2005/145/EC of 16 December 2003 on the State aid granted by France to EDF and the electricity and gas industries, OJ L 49, 22.2.2005, p. 9), the Commission took the view that ‘EDF cannot be subject to administration or compulsory liquidation proceedings, and therefore cannot be declared bankrupt, is equivalent to a general guarantee covering all its liabilities.
Komisija je zlasti v odločbi EDF (odstavek 57 Odločbe Komisije 2005/145/ES z dne 16. decembra 2003 o državnih pomočeh, ki jih je Francija odobrila družbi EDF in sektorju industrije električne energije in plinarn (UL L 49, 22.2.2005, str. 9)), menila, da „je status družbe EDF, ko ne more priti v postopek sanacije ali sodne likvidacije, ter posledično stečaja, enak splošnemu jamstvu, ki se nanaša na celotne obveznosti podjetja.
Such a guarantee, which is unlimited in scope, time and amount, constitutes State aid’.
To jamstvo, ki je v svojem obsegu neomejeno v času in v znesku, predstavlja državno pomoč“.
See the third paragraph of point 2.1 of the 2008 Guarantees Notice.
Glej obvestilo o poroštvih, točka 2.1, tretji odstavek.
See, for example, Decision 2005/145/EC.
Glej na primer Odločbo 2005/145/ES.
See inter alia point 1.5 of the Guarantees Notice, which confirms the principle of neutrality, and point 1.2, which explains that a state guarantee may result from the simple fact of the legal form (second and fourth indents of this point).
Glej zlasti točko 1.5 obvestila o poroštvih, s katero je potrjeno načelo nevtralnosti, in točko 1.2, s katero je pojasnjeno, da lahko državno poroštvo izhaja iz same pravne oblike (druga in četrta alinea te točke).
See Decision 2005/145/EC.
Glej Odločbo 2005/145/ES.
By memorandum transmitted on 31 July 2009, France informed the Commission that on 29 July 2009 the Council of Ministers had adopted a draft law on La Poste and postal activities, scheduling La Poste’s conversion into a public limited company for 1 January 2010.
Francija je z obvestilom z dne 31. julija 2009 Komisijo obvestila, da je svet ministrov 29. julija 2009 sprejel osnutek zakona o podjetju La Poste in poštnih dejavnostih, s katerim je določeno, da se 1. januarja 2010 podjetje La Poste preoblikuje v delniško družbo.
The French authorities also indicated that they would be sending their comments on the Commission’s expert’s report.
Francoski organi so še navedli, da bodo poslali pripombe k poročilu izvedenke Komisije.
Moreover, Article 2 of Law No 85-98 of 25 January 1985 on the compulsory administration and winding up of undertakings (‘the Law of 25 January 1985’), which defines the scope of the ordinary-law procedures of compulsory administration and winding up of undertakings in France, and which has become Article L 620-2 of the Commercial Code, provides that ‘administration and winding-up procedures shall apply to traders, persons registered with the craftsmen’s register, farmers and private-law entities’. It follows from the wording of that article and from the interpretation of it by the French courts that ordinary-law collective procedures do not apply to legal entities governed by public law.
Poleg tega je v členu 2 zakona št. 85-98 z dne 25. januarja 1985 o sanaciji in sodni likvidaciji podjetij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon z dne 25. januarja 1985), v katerem je opredeljeno področje uporabe občepravnih postopkov sanacije in sodne likvidacije v Franciji, ki je postal člen L620-2 trgovinskega zakonika, določeno: „Sanacija in sodna likvidacija se uporabljata za vse trgovce, vse osebe, vpisane v register poklicev, vse kmete in vse pravne osebe zasebnega prava.“ Iz besedila tega člena in njegove razlage v francoski sodni praksi izhaja, da se kolektivni postopki občega prava ne uporabljajo za pravne osebe javnega prava.
Nevertheless, Article 10 of the new Decree reproduces the wording of the fourth and fifth subparagraphs of Article 3-1 of the Decree of 12 May 1981.
Vendar pa so v členu 10 novega odloka povzeti izrazi iz četrtega in petega odstavka člena 3-1 odloka z dne 12. maja 1981.
It is therefore substantively the same.
Ukrep torej v bistvu ni spremenjen.
Following the opening decision, the French authorities submitted their observations and proposals to the Commission by letter dated 23 January 2008.
Francoski organi so po odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka Komisiji poslali svoje pripombe in predloge z dopisom z dne 23. januarja 2008.
That letter supplemented the observations and proposals set out in the previous letters from the French authorities that were summarised in the opening decision.
V tem dopisu so dopolnili pripombe in predloge iz predhodnih dopisov, ki so bili povzeti v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
In support of this interpretation, the French authorities cite the preparatory debates for the Law of 16 July 1980.
Francoski organi v podporo tej razlagi navajajo pripravljalna dela v zvezi z zakonom z dne 16. julija 1980.
During the debates, the Government opposed the amendments seeking to make it compulsory for the State to pay an exceptional subsidy to a regional or local authority whose resources were insufficient to implement a court judgment.
Vlada naj bi med temi razpravami nasprotovala spremembam, s katerimi bi za državo postalo obvezno, da ozemeljski skupnosti, katere sredstva ne bi bila zadostna za izvršitev sodne odločbe, nakaže izredno subvencijo.
The Council of State took the view that the financial substitution by the State of the defaulting local authority does not feature on the list of obligations imposed by the Law of 16 July 1980.
Po mnenju sodišča Conseil d’Etat nadomestitev finančne odgovornosti države s skupnostjo, ki ni izpolnila svojih obveznosti, ni zajeta na seznamu obveznosti, določenih z zakonom z dne 16. julija 1980.
Moreover, by investigating whether there were grounds for incurring the State’s liability in the limited area of fault — gross negligence at that — the Council of State excluded out of principle all forms of ipso jure liability and therefore any form of guarantee.
Poleg tega naj bi sodišče Conseil d’Etat pri ugotavljanju, ali je treba odgovornost države uveljavljati samo na podlagi krivde – ki je poleg tega še resna –, načelno izključilo vsakršno obliko „polnopravne“ odgovornosti in torej vsakršno obliko poroštva.
The procedure introduced by the Law of 16 July 1980 would then be implemented.
Izveden bi bil torej postopek, uveden z zakonom z dne 16. julija 1980.