natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Australian authorities have informed the Commission that one control body has undergone a restructure and changed its name.
Avstralski organi so Komisijo obvestili, da se je en nadzorni organ preoblikoval in spremenil svoje ime.
The Australian authorities have provided the Commission with the necessary guarantees to satisfy it that the restructured control body meets the preconditions laid down in Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008.
Avstralski organi so Komisiji predložili potrebna jamstva, da novi preoblikovani nadzorni organ izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 8(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1235/2008.
Certain agricultural products imported from Japan are currently marketed in the Union pursuant to the transitional rules provided for in Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008.
Nekateri kmetijski proizvodi, uvoženi iz Japonske, se zdaj tržijo v Uniji v skladu s prehodnimi določbami iz člena 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 1235/2008.
Japan submitted a request to the Commission to be included in the list provided for in Annex III to that Regulation and submitted the information required pursuant to Articles 7 and 8 of that Regulation.
Japonska je Komisiji predložila zahtevek za vključitev na seznam iz Priloge III k navedeni uredbi in v skladu s členoma 7 in 8 navedene uredbe predložila zahtevane informacije.
The examination of that information and consequent discussion with the Japanese authorities have led to the conclusion that in that country the rules governing production and controls of organic production are equivalent to those laid down in Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.
Proučitev teh informacij in posledična razprava z japonskimi organi je privedla do ugotovitve, da so v navedeni državi pravila za pridelavo in nadzor ekoloških proizvodov enakovredna tistim iz Uredbe (ES) št. 834/2007.
The Commission has examined on-the-spot the rules of production and the control measures actually applied in Japan, as provided for in Article 33(2) of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.
Komisija je na kraju samem proučila pravila pridelave in nadzorne ukrepe iz člena 33(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 834/2007, ki se na Japonskem dejansko uporabljajo.
Consequently, the Commission should include Japan in the list provided for in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008.
Zato mora Komisija vključiti Japonsko na seznam iz Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1235/2008.
in point 5 of the text relating to Australia, the fourth indent is replaced by the following:
V točki 5 se v besedilu v zvezi z Avstralijo četrta alinea nadomesti z naslednjo:
after the text relating to Israel, the following text is inserted:
Po besedilu v zvezi z Izraelom se vstavi naslednje besedilo:
‘JAPAN
„JAPONSKA
Origin products of category 1(a) and organically grown ingredients in products of category 1(b) that have been grown in Japan.
Poreklo proizvodi kategorije 1(a) in ekološko pridelane sestavine v proizvodih kategorije 1(b), ki so bili pridelani na Japonskem.
Competent authorities Labelling and Standards Division, Food Safety and Consumer Affairs Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, www.maff.go.jp/j/jas/index.html and Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center (FAMIC), www.famic.go.jp
Pristojni organi Labelling and Standards Division, Food Safety and Consumer Affairs Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, www.maff.go.jp/j/jas/index.html and Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center (FAMIC), www.famic.go.jp
Control bodies Hyogo prefectural Organic Agriculture Society (HOAS), www.hyoyuken.org
Nadzorni organi Hyogo prefectural Organic Agriculture Society (HOAS), www.hyoyuken.org
Duration of the inclusion 30 June 2013.’.
Trajanje vključitve do 30. junija 2013“.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 472/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 472/2010
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran and the United Arab Emirates
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Irana in Združenih arabskih emiratov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
On 3 September 2009, the Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of certain polyethylene terephthalate (‘PET’) originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (‘the countries concerned’).
Komisija je 3. septembra 2009 z objavo obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku) napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PET) s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevne države) v Unijo.
The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 20 July 2009 by the Polyethylene Terephthalate Committee of Plastics Europe (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Union production of certain polyethylene terephthalate.
Postopek se je začel po pritožbi, ki jo je 20. julija 2009 vložil odbor za polietilen tereftalat Plastics Europe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež celotne proizvodnje nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata v Uniji, v tem primeru več kot 50 %.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping of the product concerned originating in the countries concerned and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz zadevnih držav in znatni škodi, ki je nastala zaradi tega, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka.
The Commission officially advised the complainant producers, other known Union producers, importers/traders and users known to be concerned, exporting producers and representatives of the exporting countries concerned, of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je proizvajalce pritožnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, uvoznike/trgovce in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, proizvajalce izvoznike ter predstavnike zadevnih držav izvoznic uradno obvestila o začetku postopka.
In view of the apparent high number of Union producers and importers, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev in uvoznikov Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all Union producers and importers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product under investigation during the investigation period (1 July 2008-30 June 2009).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi proizvajalci in uvozniki Unije pozvani, da se javijo Komisiji in v skladu z obvestilom o začetku predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z izdelkom v preiskavi, v obdobju preiskave (od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009).
Fourteen Union producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Štirinajst proizvajalcev Unije je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from the cooperating Union producers, the Commission selected a sample of five Union producers representing 65 % of the sales by all cooperating Union producers.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejela od sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije, izbrala vzorec petih proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo 65 % prodaje vseh sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije.
Eight importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Osem uvoznikov je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from the cooperating importers, the Commission selected a sample of two importers representing 83 % of imports by all cooperating importers and 48 % of all imports from the UAE, Iran and Pakistan.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejela od sodelujočih uvoznikov, izbrala vzorec dveh uvoznikov, ki predstavljata 83 % uvoza vseh sodelujočih uvoznikov ter 48 % vsega uvoza iz ZAE, Irana in Pakistana.
The Commission sent questionnaires to exporting producers, sampled Union producers, sampled importers and to all users and suppliers known to be concerned as well as to those that made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike proizvajalcem izvoznikom, vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, vzorčenim uvoznikom ter vsem uporabnikom in dobaviteljem, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in tudi tistim, ki so se javili v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
Questionnaire replies were received from five sampled Union producers, one sampled importer, ten users in the Union, three suppliers of raw materials, one exporting producer in Iran and its related trader, one exporting producer in Pakistan and one exporting producer in the United Arab Emirates.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je poslalo pet vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, en vzorčeni uvoznik, deset uporabnikov v Uniji, trije dobavitelji surovin, en proizvajalec izvoznik v Iranu in z njim povezan trgovec, en proizvajalec izvoznik v Pakistanu ter en proizvajalec izvoznik v Združenih arabskih emiratih.
In addition, seven cooperating Union producers provided the requested general data for the injury analysis.
Poleg tega je sedem sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije predložilo zahtevane splošne podatke za analizo škode.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a preliminary determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za predhodno ugotovitev dampinga, z njim povzročene škode in interesa Unije.
Union producers
Proizvajalci Unije
Novapet SA, Spain,
Novapet SA, Španija,
Equipolymers srl, Italy,
Equipolymers s.r.l., Italija,
Exporting producer in Iran
Proizvajalec izvoznik v Iranu
Shahid Tondguyan Petrochemical Co. and its related companies, Bandar Imam Khomeini and Tehran;
Shahid Tondguyan Petrochemical Co. in z njim povezane družbe, Bandar Imam Khomeini in Tehran;
Exporting producer in Pakistan
Proizvajalec izvoznik v Pakistanu
Exporting producer in the United Arab Emirates
Proizvajalec izvoznik v Združenih arabskih emiratih
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2006 to the end of the investigation period (‘period considered’).
Proučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do konca obdobja preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
The product concerned is polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (‘the product concerned’), currently falling within CN code 39076020.
Zadevni izdelek je polietilen tereftalat z viskoznostjo 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5 s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek), trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN 39076020.
PET is a chemical product which is normally used in the plastics industry, for the production of bottles and sheets.
PET je kemični izdelek, ki se običajno uporablja v industriji umetnih mas za proizvodnjo plastenk in folij.
Since this grade of PET is a homogeneous product, it was not further subdivided into different product types.
Ker je ta razred PET homogen izdelek, ni bil dodatno razdeljen na različne vrste izdelkov.
The investigation showed that the PET produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry, and the PET produced and sold on the domestic markets of Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates, and exported to the Union have essentially the same basic chemical and physical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imata PET, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, ter PET, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na notranjih trgih Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov ter izvaža v Unijo, v glavnem enake osnovne kemijske in fizikalne lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
Given the considerable fluctuations in raw material costs and PET market prices observed during the IP, it was considered appropriate to make use of quarterly data in establishing the normal value and export price.
Glede na znatna nihanja stroškov surovin in tržnih cen PET v OP se je štelo za ustrezno, da se za določitev normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene uporabijo četrtletni podatki.
However, this methodology could not be applied for Iran, since the sole Iranian producer was unable to provide full quarterly cost data.
Vendar te metodologije ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za Iran, ker edini iranski proizvajalec ni mogel predložiti popolnih četrtletnih podatkov o stroških.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first established whether the domestic sales of the sole Iranian producer were sufficiently representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of its total volume of export sales of the product concerned to the Union.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej ugotovila, ali je domača prodaja edinega iranskega proizvajalca dovolj reprezentativna, tj. ali celoten obseg te prodaje predstavlja vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
The domestic sales of the sole Iranian producer were considered sufficiently representative during the investigation period.
Domača prodaja edinega iranskega proizvajalca je bila v obdobju preiskave dovolj reprezentativna.
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of the like product could be regarded as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali se lahko domača prodaja podobnega izdelka šteje za prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing for the like product sold on the Iranian market the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers during the IP.
To je bilo izvedeno tako, da se je za podobni izdelek, ki se prodaja na iranskem trgu, določil delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam v OP.
Since the volume of profitable sales of the like product represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of the like product normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales.
Ker je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje podobnega izdelka predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje podobnega izdelka, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje.
Since export sales to the Union were made through a related trading company located in Iran, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the prices of this related trader to independent customers in the Union.
Ker je izvoz v Unijo potekal prek povezane trgovske družbe v Iranu, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi cen, ki jih je ta povezani trgovec zaračunaval neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
The normal value and the export price of the sole exporting producer were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena edinega proizvajalca izvoznika sta bili primerjani na podlagi franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevajo razlike, ki vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
On this basis, adjustments for differences in level of trade, transport costs, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing costs, credit costs, and other factors (bank charges) have been made where applicable and justified.
Na podlagi tega so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v stopnji trgovine, prevoznih stroških, manipuliranju, natovarjanju in drugih tozadevnih stroških, stroških pakiranja, stroških kredita, ter drugih dejavnikih (bančni stroški), kadar je bilo primerno in upravičeno.
The company claimed an adjustment for differences in level of trade due to different sales patterns between its customers in its domestic and EU market.
Družba je zahtevala prilagoditev za razlike v stopnji trgovine zaradi različnih vzorcev prodaje med njenimi strankami na njenem notranjem trgu in trgu EU.
This was granted to the extent that the company could substantiate its claim.
Prilagoditev je bila odobrena, če je lahko družba utemeljila svojo zahtevo.
The Iranian exporting producer furthermore submitted a particular claim regarding the alleged impact of the international sanctions against Iran.
Poleg tega je iranski proizvajalec izvoznik predložil poseben zahtevek v zvezi z domnevnim vplivom mednarodnih sankcij proti Iranu.
The company claimed that, due to the sanctions, certain big US based PET customers like Coca-Cola and Pepsi are not allowed to buy PET from Iran and consequently do not issue quality certificates for PET coming from Iran.
Družba je trdila, da zaradi sankcij nekaterim velikim ameriškim kupcem PET, kot sta družbi Coca-Cola in Pepsi, ni dovoljeno kupovati PET od Irana, zaradi česar za PET s poreklom iz Irana ne izdajajo potrdil o kakovosti.
This allegedly also has an impact on other European customers who require lower prices for PET that has not been certified by Coca Cola or Pepsi.
To domnevno vpliva tudi na druge evropske stranke, ki zahtevajo nižje cene za PET, za katerega družba Coca-Cola ali Pepsi ni izdala potrdila.
However, the Iranian exporting producer was not able to quantify the alleged impact of the sanctions in a way that could be supported by any evidence.
Vendar iranski proizvajalec izvoznik domnevnega vpliva sankcij ni mogel količinsko opredeliti tako, da bi ga lahko podprl z dokazi.
Finally, the company encountered similar problems on the domestic market where local Coca-Cola and Pepsi licensees were not allowed to source PET from Iranian producers and have to rely on imports from other countries.
Družba je imela podobne težave na notranjem trgu, na katerem lokalnim imetnikom dovoljenj družb Coca-Cola in Pepsi ni bilo dovoljeno kupovati PET od iranskih proizvajalcev in so bili odvisni od uvoza iz drugih držav.
Consequently, the sanctions should also exert a downward pressure on domestic prices and, thus, there is no apparent difference for price comparison purposes.
Posledično morajo sankcije tudi izvajati pritisk za znižanje domačih cen, zato ni nobene vidne razlike za primerjavo cen.
It was therefore concluded that there were no grounds to make an allowance in the form of an adjustment for the impact of sanctions on Iran.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da ni razlogov za upoštevanje razlik v obliki prilagoditve zaradi vpliva sankcij na Iran.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin for the sole Iranian producer was established on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price.
V skladu s členoma 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga za edinega iranskega proizvajalca določena na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
Based on information available from the complaint and the cooperating Iranian exporting producer, there are no other known producers of the product concerned in Iran.
Na podlagi informacij iz pritožbe in informacij, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči iranski proizvajalec izvoznik, v Iranu ni drugih znanih proizvajalcev zadevnega izdelka.
Therefore, the country-wide dumping margin to be established for Iran should be equal to the dumping margin established for the sole cooperating exporting producer in Iran.
Zato mora biti stopnja dampinga na ravni države, ki se določi za Iran, enaka stopnji dampinga, določeni za edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v Iranu.
The provisional dumping margin for Iran, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is 28,6 %.
Začasna stopnja dampinga za Iran, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, je 28,6 %.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first established whether the domestic sales of the sole Pakistani producer were sufficiently representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of its total volume of export sales of the product concerned to the Union.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej ugotovila, ali je domača prodaja edinega pakistanskega proizvajalca dovolj reprezentativna, tj. ali celoten obseg te prodaje predstavlja vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
The domestic sales of the sole Pakistani producer were considered sufficiently representative during the investigation period.
Domača prodaja edinega pakistanskega proizvajalca je bila v obdobju preiskave dovolj reprezentativna.
This was done by establishing for the like product sold on the Pakistani market the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers during the IP.
To je bilo izvedeno tako, da se je za podobni izdelek, ki se prodaja na pakistanskem trgu, določil delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam v OP.
Since the volume of profitable sales of the like product represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of the like product on the domestic market, normal value was calculated as the weighted average of all domestic sales prices of the like product.
Ker je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje podobnega izdelka predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje podobnega izdelka na notranjem trgu, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot tehtano povprečje vseh domačih prodajnih cen podobnega izdelka.
The sole exporting producer in Pakistan exported the product concerned directly to independent customers in the Union.
Edini proizvajalec izvoznik v Pakistanu je zadevni izdelek izvažal neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
Export prices were therefore established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable by these independent customers for the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Zato so bile izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določene na podlagi cen, ki so jih te neodvisne stranke dejansko plačevale ali jih plačujejo za zadevni izdelek.
The normal values and the export price of the sole exporting producer were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalne vrednosti in izvozna cena edinega proizvajalca izvoznika so bile primerjane na podlagi franko tovarna.