natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671.
Glej zadevo Philip Morris proti Komisiji, 730/79, Recueil 1980, str. 2671.
See Case 259/86 France v Commission [1978] ECR 4393.
Glej zadevo Francija proti Komisiji, 259/86, Recueil 1878, str. 4393.
See Case T-214/95 Vlaams Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717, paragraph 49.
Glej zadevo Vlaams Gewest proti Komisiji, T-214/95, Recueil 1998, str. II-717, točka 49.
See Case C-172/03 Heiser [1998] ECR I-1627, paragraph 32.
Glej zadevo Heiser, C-172/03, Recueil 1998, str. I-1627, točka 32.
See Joined Cases 212/80 and 217/80 Meridionale Industria Salumi and Others [1981] ECR 2735; Joined Cases CT Control Rotterdam and JCT Benelux v Commission [1981] ECR I-3873 and Case C-61/98 De Haan Beheer [2000] ECR I-5003.
Glej združeni zadevi Meridionale Industria Salumi in drugi, 212/80 in 217/80, Recueil 1981, str. 2735; združeni zadevi CT Control Rotterdam in JCT Benelux proti Komisiji, Recueil 1981, str. I-3873 in zadevo De Haan Beheer, C-61/98, Recueil 2000, str. I-5003.
Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (1986-94) — Annex 1 — Annex 1A — Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (WTO-GATT 1994) (OJ L 336, 23.12.1994, p. 156).
Urugvajski krog večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj (1986–1994) – Priloga 1 – Priloga 1A – Sporazum o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih (WTO-GATT 1994) (UL L 336, 23.12.1994, str. 156).
In line with Commission established practice.
V skladu z uveljavljeno prakso Komisije.
See for example: Commission Decision 2003/643/EC of 13 May 2003 on the State aid implemented by Germany for Kahla Porzellan GmbH and Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH (OJ L 227, 11.9.2003, p. 12).
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije 2003/643/ES z dne 13. maja 2003 o državni pomoči, ki jo izvaja Nemčija v korist Kahla Porzellan GmbH in Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH (UL L 227, 11.9.2003, str. 12).
Such a modification could, in any event, only have been made to the first subsidised loan granted to WAM SpA as it applied to funding which already existed when it came into force, whereas the second loan had not yet been granted to WAM SpA.
UL L 13, 13.1.2001, str. 20.
Article 107(2) TFEU stipulates that the following aid is compatible with the common market: (a) aid having a social character, granted to individual consumers, provided that such aid is granted without discrimination related to the origin of the products concerned; (b) aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences; (c) aid granted to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany.
V vsakem primeru bi bila takšna sprememba lahko izvedena samo za prvo subvencionirano posojilo za podjetje WAM SpA, saj se je nanašala na financiranje, ki je ob njenem začetku veljavnosti že obstajalo, medtem ko v tistem času drugo posojilo še ni bilo dodeljeno.
Namely, ‘aid to promote economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment, and of the regions referred to in Article 349, in view of their structural, economic and social situation.’
Člen 107(2) PDEU določa, da je s skupnim trgom združljiva naslednja pomoč: (a) pomoč socialnega značaja, dodeljena posameznim potrošnikom, pod pogojem, da je dodeljena brez diskriminacije glede na poreklo zadevnih izdelkov; (b) pomoč za povrnitev škode, ki so jo povzročile naravne nesreče ali izjemni dogodki; (c) pomoč, dodeljena gospodarstvu nekaterih območij Zvezne republike Nemčije …
Namely, ‘aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State.’
In sicer, „pomoč za pospeševanje gospodarskega razvoja območij, kjer je življenjska raven izjemno nizka ali kjer je podzaposlenost velika, in v regijah iz člena 349 glede na njihov strukturni, gospodarski in socialni položaj“.
Namely, ‘aid to promote culture and heritage conservation where such aid does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Union to an extent that is contrary to the common interest.’
In sicer, „pomoč za pospeševanje izvedbe pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa ali za odpravljanje resne motnje v gospodarstvu države članice“.
Published regularly in the Official Journal of the European Union.
In sicer, „pomoč za pospeševanje kulture in ohranjanja kulturne dediščine, kadar takšna pomoč ne škoduje trgovinskim pogojem in konkurenci v Uniji v obsegu, ki je v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi“.
OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Redno objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
OJ L 82, 25.3.2008, p. 1.
UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1.
See Cases T-92/00 and T-103/00 Diputación Foral de Álava v Commission (Ramondín) [2002] ECR II-1385.
UL L 82, 25.3.2008, str. 1. [53] Glej zadevi Diputación Foral de Álava proti Komisiji (Ramondín), T-92/00 in T-103/00, Recueil 2002, str. II-1385.
Requests for information were addressed to the Italian authorities by letters of 5 August 1999 and 10 September 1999.
Italijanskim oblastem so bile z dopisoma z dne 5. avgusta 1999 in 10. septembra 1999 poslane zahteve za informacije.
The complainant submitted additional information by letter of 2 September 1999.
Pritožnik je z dopisom z dne 2. septembra 1999 predložil dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 13 December 1999, the Commission communicated to the complainant the reply of the Italian authorities submitted by letter of 11 October 1999, and announced that it intended to carry out a formal investigation.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 13. decembra 1999 pritožniku sporočila odgovor italijanskih oblasti, ki so ga te predložile z dopisom z dne 11. oktobra 1999, in navedla svojo namero, da izvede formalno preiskavo.
The Italian authorities replied by letter of 21 May 2002.
Italijanske oblasti so odgovorile z dopisom z dne 21. maja 2002.
By letter dated 5 June 2002, the Commission informed the Italian authorities that it considered the information submitted to be incomplete and asked for the missing information and further clarifications to be provided within 20 working days from receipt of the letter.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 5. junija 2002 italijanske oblasti obvestila, da meni, da predložene informacije niso popolne, ter jih zaprosila, da v dvajsetih delovnih dneh od prejema zadevnega dopisa dopolnijo manjkajoče informacije in zagotovijo dodatna pojasnila.
By letter of 1 July 2003, preceded by a fax of the same date, a request for access to the whole file was submitted by WAM SpA. The request was rejected by the Commission by letter of 14 July 2003.
Podjetje WAM SpA je z dopisom z dne 1. julija 2003 in s faksom (poslanim pred dopisom istega dne) vložilo zahtevo za dostop do celotne dokumentacije, ki jo je Komisija zavrnila z dopisom z dne 14. julija 2003.
By letter of 27 June 2003, the complainant expressed the intention to claim compensation from WAM SpA in view of the losses it had incurred, if the Commission’s final decision was negative. It asked to be informed of the procedure to be followed.
Pritožnik je z dopisom z dne 27. junija 2003 izrazil namero, da bo v primeru negativnega končnega sklepa Komisije zahteval nadomestilo od podjetja WAM SpA v zvezi s škodo, ki jo je utrpel, in zaprosil za obveščanje glede nadaljnjega postopka.
Ahead of the meeting, the Italian authorities had provided some information by letter of 22 July 2003, registered as received on 25 July 2003.
Pred tem sestankom so italijanske oblasti z dopisom z dne 22. julija 2003, evidentiranim in prejetim 25. julija 2003, predložile nekatere informacije.
Additional information was sent directly to the Commission by letter of 8 August 2003 from the Prime Minister’s Office (Department for Coordination of Community Policies).
Urad predsednika vlade (Služba za usklajevanje politik Skupnosti) je Komisiji z dopisom z dne 8. avgusta 2003 posredoval dodatne informacije.
As regards WAM SpA’s presence in the Italian market, the company’s market share in the cement screw conveyor market was 60 % in 1991, 50 % in 2000 and 55 % in 2003.
V zvezi s prisotnostjo podjetja WAM SpA na italijanskem trgu je bilo stanje naslednje: tržni delež podjetja na trgu polžnih transporterjev za cement je bil leta 1991 60 %, leta 2000 50 % in leta 2003 55 %.
In the dust collector market, the company’s market share was 40 % in 1991 and increased to 50 % in 2000 and to 60 % in 2003 [9].
Na trgu zbiralnikov prahu je bil tržni delež podjetja WAM SpA leta 1991 40 %, leta 2000 50 % in leta 2003 že 60 % [9].
From 1997 onward, WAM SpA expanded into other EU markets, in particular West Germany and France. In 2000, it had a market share for cement screw conveyors of 70 % in France and Germany and 60 % in the UK, whilst the corresponding figures for round dust collectors were 50 % in France, 20 % in Germany and 10 % in the UK [10].
Leta 1997 je podjetje WAM SpA začelo širiti svojo prodajo tudi na trge drugih držav članic Unije, zlasti v Zahodno Nemčijo in Francijo: leta 2000 je imelo podjetje na trgu polžnih transporterjev za cement v Franciji in Nemčiji 70-odstotni tržni delež, v Združenem kraljestvu pa 60-odstotni delež, na trgu okroglih zbiralnikov prahu pa je podjetje WAM SpA imelo v Franciji 50-odstotni tržni delež, v Nemčiji 20-odstotni delež in v Združenem kraljestvu 10-odstotni tržni delež [10].
In 1994 a Japanese subsidiary, WAM Japan, was established. It focused on the marketing of two products which were manufactured in Italy and whose transport costs were relatively low: dust collectors and valves.
Leta 1994 je bila ustanovljena japonska odvisna družba WAM Japan, ki se je ukvarjala s trženjem dveh proizvodov, izdelanih v Italiji, katerih stroški prevoza so bili precej nizki, to so zbiralniki prahu in ventili.
At the time the formal investigation procedure was initiated, the Commission was not aware of any specific feature, such as aid intensity or eligible expenditure, of the ‘WAM group’ aid (as the Italian authorities term it) granted in 2000, again in the form of a subsidised loan, under Law No 394/81. No information concerning it had been submitted by the Italian authorities.
V času, ko se je začel formalni postopek preiskave, Komisiji niso bile znane nobene posebne podrobnosti, kot so intenzivnost pomoči in upravičeni izdatki, glede pomoči za „družbo WAM“ (kakor so jo opredelile italijanske oblasti), odobrene leta 2000, še vedno v obliki subvencioniranega posojila v okviru zakona št. 394/81, saj italijanske oblasti do takrat še niso predložile nobenih ustreznih informacij.
The last one, amounting to EUR 248091,01, was paid on 22 January 2003.
Zadnji, ki je znašal 248091,01 EUR, je bil izplačan 22. januarja 2003.
The conditions under which this loan was granted are the same as those for the 1995 loan since both were granted under Law No 394/81.
Pogoji za odobritev tega posojila so enaki pogojem za odobritev posojila iz leta 1995, saj sta bili obe posojili odobreni v okviru zakona št. 394/81.
As regards repayment, the data supplied by the Italian authorities shows that the grace period of two years, during which only the interest on the loan instalments already disbursed to the beneficiary was paid, elapsed on 20 February 2003.
Kar zadeva povračilo, je iz podatkov, ki so jih predložile italijanske oblasti, razvidno, da je 20. februarja 2003 poteklo dveletno obdobje podaljšanega plačilnega roka, v katerem so bile povrnjene le obresti na obroke posojila, ki so upravičencu že bili izplačani. Dne 20. avgusta 2003 se je začelo petletno obdobje odplačevanja. Odplačevanje je potekalo enakomerno, v enakih polletnih obrokih, pri tem pa so se obresti zaračunavale na preostanek dolga.
To be more precise, WAM SpA was a medium-sized enterprise as it had 163 employees, an annual turnover of EUR 16,8 million and a balance sheet total of EUR 20,1 million. It was controlled by two finance companies which were themselves SMEs within the meaning of the abovementioned recommendation.
Natančneje, podjetje WAM SpA je bilo srednje veliko podjetje, saj je zaposlovalo 163 ljudi, imelo 16,8 milijona EUR letnega prometa, njegov bilančni rezultat pa je bil 20,1 milijona EUR. Nadzorovali sta ga dve finančni družbi, ki sta bili v smislu zgoraj navedenega priporočila sami MSP.
As the aid was granted in 1995 when the 1992 SMEs guidelines were in force, the 1992 SMEs guidelines must be applied [38].
Ker je bila pomoč dodeljena leta 1995, ko so veljale smernice za MSP iz leta 1992, je treba uporabiti te smernice [38].
These guidelines did not explicitly exclude export aid from their scope.
Te smernice iz področja uporabe niso izrecno izključile izvozne pomoči.
A portion of the aid can be considered compatible with the internal market on the basis of the 1992 SME guidelines.
Del pomoči je mogoče označiti kot združljivega z notranjim trgom na podlagi smernic za MSP iz leta 1992.
In particular the aid for consultancy services (ITL 29,43 million) and market surveys (ITL 40,95 million) can be considered compatible as it complies with point 4.3 ‘Aid for consultancy help, training and dissemination of knowledge’.
Zlasti je kot združljivo mogoče označiti pomoč za svetovalne storitve (29,43 milijona ITL) in tržne raziskave (40,95 milijona ITL), saj je ta pomoč skladna s točko 4.3 „Pomoč za svetovalno pomoč, usposabljanje in razširjanje znanja“.
Moreover, the same wording used to classify the first loan to WAM SpA as an incentive to undertake market penetration programmes was also used in the contract for granting the aid in 2000.
Poleg tega je bilo besedilo, uporabljeno za opredelitev prvega posojila za podjetje WAM SpA kot spodbude za izvedbo programov uveljavitve na trgu, uporabljeno tudi v pogodbi za dodelitev pomoči leta 2000.
Therefore, by virtue of Article 8(6) of that Regulation, the entire aid measure cannot be exempted under the 2008 General Block Exemption Regulation.
Zato na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah iz leta 2008 celotnega ukrepa pomoči ni mogoče izvzeti na podlagi zadevne uredbe.
Thus, in accordance with Article 44(2) of the 2008 general block exemption Regulation, the compatibility of the aid with Regulations (EC) No 68/2001, (EC) No 70/2001, (EC) No 2204/2002 and (EC) No 628/2006 must be assessed.
V skladu s členom 44(2) Uredbe o splošnih skupinskih izjemah iz leta 2008 je treba oceniti združljivost pomoči z uredbami (ES) št. 68/2001, (ES) št. 70/2001, (ES) št. 2204/2002 in (ES) št. 1628/2006.
Indeed, the 1995 loan was granted on 24 November 1995 and the 2000 loan was granted on 9 November 2000.
Posojilo iz leta 1995 je bilo dodeljeno 24. novembra 1995, posojilo iz leta 2000 pa 9. novembra 2000.
Accordingly, the Commission finds that, with the exception of the block-exempted compatible portion of the aid, in so far as these loans have been implemented in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, now Article 108(3) of the TFEU, they were granted unlawfully to the beneficiary.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da sta bili posojili upravičencu dodeljeni nezakonito, razen skupinsko izvzetega združljivega dela pomoči, saj sta pri izvedbi kršili člen 88(3) Pogodbe ES, zdaj člen 108(3) PDEU.
The overall repayment, including principal and interest, was to have been made by 20 February 2008.
Vračilo celotnega posojila, vključno z glavnico in obrestmi, naj bi bilo zaključeno 20. februarja 2008.
Accordingly, the grant equivalent of the aid component of the full loan as at 12 February 2001 (date on which the first instalment of the specific loan was made available to WAM SpA) is EUR 182550,80, providing that the repayments were made according to the repayment schedule.
V skladu s tem bi bil ekvivalent dotacije dela pomoči celotnega zadevnega posojila z dne 12. februarja 2001 (datum, ko je bilo podjetju WAM SpA dan na razpolago pri obrok zadevnega posojila) 182550,80 EUR, v kolikor se vračila izvajajo po načrtu odplačevanja.
As a part of the loan in question has been considered compatible, this amount must be deducted from the State aid component of the 1995 loan (EUR 108165,10). Given the impossibility of establishing a direct link between a given instalment of the loan and certain specific expenses, the percentage represented by the compatible items in the overall loan (ITL 82,57 million out of ITL 1358,51 million, i.e. 6 %) has been applied to the overall grant equivalent.
Ker je bil del zadevnega posojila označen za združljivega, je treba ta znesek odšteti od komponente državne pomoči posojila iz leta 1995, tj. 108165,10 EUR. Ker ni mogoče vzpostaviti povezave med posameznim obrokom posojila in določenimi specifičnimi stroški, velja za skupni ekvivalent dotacije odstotek, kakor ga predstavljajo združljive postavke glede na celotno posojilo (82,57 milijona ITL od 1358,51 milijona ITL, to je 6 %).
Therefore, it must be concluded that since export-related activities are excluded from the application of Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 and they cannot be considered compatible with Article 107(3)(c) of the TFEU on any legal basis, the aid provided by means of the second loan is incompatible with the internal market, with the exception of the compatible portion of training aid as described above. General observations
Zato je treba zaključiti, da pomoč, dodeljena z drugim posojilom, ni združljiva z notranjim trgom, razen združljivega dela pomoči za usposabljanje, kakor je opisano zgoraj, in sicer zato, ker so dejavnosti, povezane z izvozom, izvzete iz uporabe Uredbe št. 1998/2006 in jih ni mogoče šteti za združljive s členom 107(3)(c) PDEU ali katero koli drugo pravno podlago.
On 20 August 2003, the five-year repayment period started. Repayment was on a straight-line basis and in equal half-yearly instalments, with interest due on the outstanding balance. According to the schedule, repayment should therefore have been completed by 20 February 2008.
Na ta način naj bi bil dolg v celoti odplačan do 20. februarja 2008.
It should also be noted that the specific programme was to have been carried out jointly by WAM SpA and the local firm, WAM Bulk Handling Machinery Shangai Co Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of WAM SpA.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da bi morala ta program skupaj izvajati podjetje WAM SpA in lokalno podjetje WAM Bulk Handling Machinery Shangai Co Ltd, ki je v izključni lasti podjetja WAM SpA.
As a result of the aid, WAM SpA’s overall position in the market strengthened, or could potentially have strengthened, by comparison with undertakings from other Member States which are not only WAM SpA’s actual but also potential competitors. According to settled case law ‘aid which is intended to relieve an undertaking of the expenses which it would normally have to bear in its day-to-day management or its usual activities in principle distorts competition’ [26].
Zaradi pomoči se je splošni položaj podjetja WAM SpA na trgu okrepil oziroma bi se lahko okrepil v primerjavi s podjetji iz drugih držav članic, ki niso le dejanski konkurenti, temveč tudi potencialni konkurenti podjetja WAM SpA V skladu z uveljavljeno sodno prakso „pomoči, ki so namenjene za zmanjšanje stroškov podjetja, ki bi jih to običajno moralo nositi v okviru tekočega poslovanja običajnih dejavnosti, načeloma izkrivljajo pogoje konkurence.“ [26]
of 30 August 2010
z dne 30. avgusta 2010
amending Decision 2006/594/EC fixing an indicative allocation by Member State of the commitment appropriations for the Convergence Objective for the period 2007-2013 as regards additional allocations for the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia
o spremembi Odločbe 2006/594/ES o določitvi okvirne dodelitve odobritev za prevzem obveznosti po državah članicah za konvergenčni cilj za obdobje 2007–2013 v zvezi z dodatnimi dodelitvami za Češko, Poljsko in Slovaško
(notified under document C(2010) 5817)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 5817)
By Decision 2006/594/EC [2], as amended by Decision 2007/191/EC [3], the Commission fixed an indicative allocation by Member State of the commitment appropriations for the Convergence Objective for the period 2007 to 2013.
Z Odločbo 2006/594/ES [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2007/191/ES [3], je Komisija določila okvirno dodelitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti po državah članicah za konvergenčni cilj za obdobje 2007–2013.
In accordance with paragraph 10 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, in 2010 it has been established that the cumulated GDP for the years 2007 to 2009 in the Czech Republic, in Poland and in Slovakia has each diverged by more than ± 5 % from the cumulated GDP estimated in accordance with paragraph 9 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, including as a consequence of exchange rate changes.
V skladu z odstavkom 10 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1083/2006 je bilo leta 2010 ugotovljeno, da se akumulirani BDP za obdobje 2007–2009 na Češkem, Poljskem in Slovaškem razlikuje za več kot ± 5 % od akumuliranega BDP, ocenjenega v skladu z odstavkom 9 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1083/2006, vključno zaradi sprememb deviznih tečajev.
The amounts allocated for the period 2011 to 2013 to the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia should therefore be adjusted accordingly.
Zneske, dodeljene za obdobje 2011–2013 za Češko, Poljsko in Slovaško, je treba zato ustrezno prilagoditi.
In accordance with points 16 and 17 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [4] on 16 April 2010 the Commission adopted the Communication on the technical adjustment of the financial framework for 2011 in line with movements in GNI, including the adjustment of amounts allocated from funds supporting cohesion to the Member States concerned by divergence between estimated and actual GDP for the period 2007-2009 [5], by which it informed that a positive adjustment is necessary for the Czech Republic of EUR 237045801, for Poland of EUR 632392153 and for Slovakia of EUR 137711534, to be shared in equal amounts in 2011, 2012 and 2013.
V skladu s točkama 16 in 17 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [4] je Komisija 16. aprila 2010 sprejela Sporočilo o tehnični prilagoditvi finančnega okvira za leto 2011 v skladu z gibanjem BND, vključno s prilagoditvijo zneskov, dodeljenih državam članicam, v katerih sta se ocenjeni in dejanski BDP v obdobju 2007–2009 razlikovala, iz skladov, ki podpirajo kohezijo [5], v katerem je sporočila, da je potrebna pozitivna prilagoditev v višini 237045801 EUR za Češko, 632392153 EUR za Poljsko in 137711534 EUR za Slovaško, pri čemer se bodo zneski enakomerno porazdelili v letih 2011, 2012 in 2013.
In order to establish the amounts allocated to the Member States concerned, it is necessary to take into account the pro-rata allocation between the Convergence and Regional competitiveness and employment objectives in the current programming period 2007-2013 for each of the Member States concerned and the need to make the most efficient use of the allocation of the funds to projects currently being implemented.
Za določitev zneskov, dodeljenih zadevnim državam članicam, je treba upoštevati sorazmerno porazdelitev med konvergenčni cilj ter cilj regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja v sedanjem programskem obdobju 2007–2013 za vsako izmed zadevnih držav članic ter potrebo po čim učinkovitejšem dodeljevanju sredstev za projekte, ki se trenutno izvajajo.
Therefore, this Decision should allocate only the part of the overall positive adjustments concerning the Convergence objective.
Zato je treba s tem sklepom dodeliti samo del celotnega zneska pozitivnih prilagoditev v zvezi s konvergenčnim ciljem.
For reasons of efficiency, it is appropriate to replace the amounts in the row Total of Table 2 of Annex III to Decision 2006/594/EC for the years 2007 to 2010 since they do not reflect the figures given for Bulgaria.
Zaradi večje učinkovitosti je primerno nadomestiti zneske v vrstici „Skupaj“ iz Preglednice 2 Priloge III k Odločbi 2006/594/ES za obdobje 2007–2010, ker ne odražajo podatkov za Bolgarijo.
Decision 2006/594/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Odločbo 2006/594/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annex I is replaced by the text set out in Annex I to this Decision;
Priloga I se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge I k temu sklepu;
Annex III is replaced by the text set out in Annex II to this Decision.
Priloga III se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge II k temu sklepu.