natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to help patients to make an informed choice when they seek to receive healthcare in another Member State, Member States of treatment should ensure that patients from other Member States receive on request the relevant information on safety and quality standards enforced on its territory as well as on which healthcare providers are subject to these standards.
Da bi pacientom lahko pomagali sprejeti ozaveščeno odločitev, ko želijo prejeti zdravstveno varstvo v drugi državi članici, bi morale države članice zdravljenja zagotoviti, da pacienti iz drugih držav članic na zahtevo dobijo ustrezne informacije o standardih varnosti in kakovosti, ki veljajo na njenem ozemlju, pa tudi o tem, za katere izvajalce zdravstvenega varstva se ti standardi uporabljajo.
Furthermore, healthcare providers should provide patients on request with information on specific aspects of the healthcare services they offer and on the treatment options.
Nadalje bi morali izvajalci zdravstvenega varstva pacientom na zahtevo zagotoviti informacije o posebnih vidikih storitev zdravstvenega varstva, ki jih ponujajo, in o možnostih zdravljenja.
To the extent that healthcare providers already provide patients resident in the Member State of treatment with relevant information on those specific aspects, this Directive should not oblige healthcare providers to provide more extensive information to patients from other Member States.
Če izvajalci zdravstvenega varstva pacientom s stalnim prebivališčem v državi članici zdravljenja že sedaj zagotavljajo ustrezne informacije, ta direktiva izvajalcev zdravstvenega varstva ne zavezuje, da bi morali pacientom iz drugih držav članic zagotavljati obširnejše informacije.
Nothing should prevent the Member State of treatment from also obliging other actors than the healthcare providers, such as insurance providers or public authorities, to provide the information on specific aspects of the healthcare services offered, if that would be more appropriate with regard to the organisation of its healthcare system.
Državi članici zdravljenja nič ne bi smelo preprečevati, da obveznost zagotavljanja informacij o posebnih vidikih storitev zdravstvenega varstva, ki jih ponujajo, poleg izvajalcem zdravstvenega varstva naloži tudi drugim akterjem, kot so zavarovalnice ali javni organi, če bi to bilo glede na organizacijo njenega sistema zdravstvenega varstva primerneje.
In its Conclusions the Council recognised that there is a set of common values and principles that are shared across the Union about how health systems respond to the needs of the population and patients that they serve.
Svet je v svojih sklepih priznal, da ima celotna Unija vrsto skupnih vrednot in načel o tem, kako se zdravstveni sistemi odzivajo na potrebe prebivalstva in bolnikov, katerim so namenjeni.
The overarching values of universality, access to good quality care, equity, and solidarity have been widely acknowledged in the work of various Union institutions.
Temeljne vrednote univerzalnosti, dostopa do visokokakovostne oskrbe, enakosti in solidarnosti so pri svojem delu upoštevale različne institucije Unije.
Therefore, Member States should also ensure that these values are respected with regard to patients and citizens from other Member States, and that all patients are treated equitably on the basis of their healthcare needs rather than on the basis of their Member State of affiliation.
Zato bi morale države članice tudi poskrbeti, da se bodo te vrednote upoštevale pri pacientih in državljanih iz drugih držav članic ter da se vsi pacienti obravnavajo enako na podlagi njihovih zdravstvenih potreb in ne na podlagi države članice njihovega zdravstvenega zavarovanja.
In doing so, Member States should respect the principles of free movement of persons within the internal market, non-discrimination, inter alia, with regard to nationality and necessity and proportionality of any restrictions on free movement.
Pri tem bi morale države članice upoštevati načela prostega pretoka oseb znotraj notranjega trga, nediskriminacije, med drugim na podlagi državljanstva, ter nujnosti in sorazmernosti kakršnih koli omejitev prostega pretoka.
However, nothing in this Directive should oblige healthcare providers to accept for planned treatment patients from other Member States or to prioritise them to the detriment of other patients, for instance by increasing the waiting time for treatment of other patients.
Vendar nobena določba te direktive od izvajalcev zdravstvenega varstva ne bi smela zahtevati, da sprejmejo načrtovano zdravljenje pacientov iz drugih držav članic ali jim dajo prednost v škodo drugih pacientov, na primer s podaljševanjem čakalnih dob za zdravljenje drugih pacientov.
Inflows of patients may create a demand exceeding the capacities existing in a Member State for a given treatment.
Dotoki pacientov lahko privedejo do povpraševanja, ki presega zmogljivosti, ki so v državi članici na voljo za določeno zdravljenje.
In such exceptional cases, the Member State should retain the possibility to remedy the situation on the grounds of public health, in accordance with Articles 52 and 62 TFEU.
V takšnih izjemnih primerih bi morala država članica ohraniti možnost, da nastalo situacijo uredi iz razlogov javnega zdravja, v skladu s členoma 52 in 62 PDEU.
However, this limitation should be without prejudice to Member States’ obligations under Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems [5].
Vendar pa takšna omejitev ne bi smela posegati v obveznosti držav članic v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 883/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti [5].
Systematic and continuous efforts should be made to ensure that quality and safety standards are improved in line with the Council Conclusions and taking into account advances in international medical science and generally recognised good medical practices as well as taking into account new health technologies.
V skladu s sklepi Sveta bi si bilo treba sistematično in nenehno prizadevati za izboljševanje standardov kakovosti in varnosti, ob upoštevanju napredka v mednarodni medicini in splošno priznane dobre zdravstvene prakse ter novih zdravstvenih tehnologij.
Ensuring clear common obligations in respect of the provision of mechanisms for responding to harm arising from healthcare is essential to prevent lack of confidence in those mechanisms being an obstacle to taking up cross-border healthcare.
Zagotavljanje jasnih skupnih obveznosti v zvezi z določbami mehanizmov za ravnanje v primeru povzročitve škode, ki nastane zaradi zdravstvenega varstva, je bistveno, da se prepreči pomanjkanje zaupanja v tiste mehanizme, ki ovirajo čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo.
Systems for addressing harm in the Member State of treatment should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to extend the coverage of their domestic systems to patients from their country seeking healthcare abroad, where this is more appropriate for the patient.
Sistemi za obravnavo škode v državi članici zdravljenja ne bi smeli posegati v možnost države članice, da obseg kritja svojega nacionalnega sistema razširi na paciente iz te države, ki iščejo zdravstveno varstvo v tujini, kadar je to za pacienta ugodneje.
Member States should ensure that mechanisms for the protection of patients and for seeking remedies in the event of harm are in place for healthcare provided on their territory and that they are appropriate to the nature and extent of the risk.
Države članice bi morale v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom, opravljenim na njihovem ozemlju, poskrbeti, da so za zagotovitev zaščite pacientov in za uveljavljanje pravnih sredstev v primeru povzročitve škode vzpostavljeni mehanizmi, ki ustrezajo naravi in obsegu tveganja.
However, it should be for the Member State to determine the nature and modalities of such a mechanism.
Določitev narave in načinov uporabe takšnega mehanizma pa bi morala biti prepuščena državam članicam.
The right to the protection of personal data is a fundamental right recognised by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Pravica do varstva osebnih podatkov je temeljna pravica, priznana s členom 8 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Ensuring continuity of cross-border healthcare depends on transfer of personal data concerning patients’ health.
Zagotavljanje kontinuitete pri čezmejnem zdravstvenem varstvu je odvisno od prenosa osebnih podatkov o zdravju pacientov.
These personal data should be able to flow from one Member State to another, but at the same time the fundamental rights of the individuals should be safeguarded.
Med državami članicami bi moral biti zagotovljen pretok teh osebnih podatkov, hkrati pa bi bilo treba zaščititi temeljne pravice posameznikov.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [6] establishes the right for individuals to have access to their personal data concerning their health, for example the data in their medical records containing such information as diagnosis, examination results, assessments by treating physicians and any treatment or interventions provided.
Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [6] posameznikom zagotavlja pravico do dostopa do lastnih osebnih podatkov o zdravju, na primer podatkov v njihovi zdravstveni kartoteki, ki vključuje informacije, kot so diagnoza, rezultati preiskav, ocene lečečih zdravnikov in drugo zdravljenje ali posegi.
Those provisions should also apply in the context of cross-border healthcare covered by this Directive.
Te določbe bi se morale uporabljati tudi za čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo, ki ga zajema ta direktiva.
The right to reimbursement of the costs of healthcare provided in another Member State by the statutory social security system of patients as insured persons has been recognised by the Court of Justice in several judgements.
Sodišče je v več sodbah priznalo pravico pacientov kot zavarovanih oseb do povračila stroškov za zdravstveno varstvo v drugi državi članici iz obveznega sistema socialne varnosti.
The Court of Justice has held that the Treaty provisions on the freedom to provide services include the freedom for the recipients of healthcare, including persons in need of medical treatment, to go to another Member State in order to receive it there.
Sodišče je menilo, da določbe Pogodbe o pravici opravljanja storitev vključujejo pravico prejemnikov zdravstvenega varstva, vključno z osebami, ki potrebujejo zdravljenje, da ga poiščejo v drugi državi članici.
The same should apply to recipients of healthcare seeking to receive healthcare provided in another Member State through other means, for example through eHealth services.
Enako bi moralo veljati za prejemnike zdravstvenega varstva, ki iščejo zdravstveno varstvo v drugi državi članici na druge načine, na primer prek e-zdravstvenih storitev.
In accordance with the principles established by the Court of Justice, and without endangering the financial balance of Member States’ healthcare and social security systems, greater legal certainty as regards the reimbursement of healthcare costs should be provided for patients and for health professionals, healthcare providers and social security institutions.
V skladu z načeli, ki jih je določilo Sodišče, in brez ogrožanja finančnega ravnotežja sistemov zdravstvenega varstva in socialne varnosti držav članic, bi bilo treba zagotoviti boljšo pravno varnost glede povračila stroškov za zdravstveno varstvo za paciente ter zdravstvene delavce, izvajalce zdravstvenega varstva in institucije, pristojne za socialno varnost.
This Directive should not affect an insured person’s rights in respect of the assumption of costs of healthcare which becomes necessary on medical grounds during a temporary stay in another Member State according to Regulation (EC) No 883/2004.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v pravice zavarovane osebe do kritja stroškov zdravstvenega varstva, ki je nujno iz zdravstvenih razlogov v času začasnega bivanja v drugi državi članici v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 883/2004.
In addition, this Directive should not affect an insured person’s right to be granted an authorisation for treatment in another Member State where the conditions provided for by Union regulations on the coordination of social security systems are met, in particular by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 or Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community [7], which are applicable by virtue of Regulation (EU) No 1231/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 extending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these Regulations solely on the ground of their nationality [8] and Council Regulation (EC) No 859/2003 of 14 May 2003 extending the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by those provisions solely on the ground of their nationality [9].
Poleg tega ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v pravico zavarovane osebe do odobritve zdravljenja v drugi državi članici, kadar so izpolnjeni pogoji iz uredb Unije o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti, zlasti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 883/2004 ali Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 z dne 14. junija 1971 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe, samozaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti [7], ki se uporabljata na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1231/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o razširitvi uporabe uredb (ES) št. 883/2004 in (ES) št. 987/2009 na državljane tretjih držav, za katere se navedeni uredbi ne uporabljata le na podlagi njihovega državljanstva [8], ter Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 859/2003 z dne 14. maja 2003 o razširitvi določb Uredbe (EGS) št. 1408/71 in Uredbe (EGS) št. 574/72 na državljane tretjih držav, za katere navedene določbe ne veljajo le na podlagi njihovega državljanstva [9].
It is appropriate to require that also patients who seek healthcare in another Member State in other circumstances than those provided for in Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 should be able to benefit from the principles of free movement of patients, services and goods in accordance with the TFEU and with this Directive.
Primerno je zahtevati, da bi se moralo tudi pacientom, ki iščejo zdravstveno varstvo v drugi državi članici v okoliščinah, ki niso predvidene v Uredbi (ES) št. 883/2004, omogočiti uresničevanje načel prostega pretoka pacientov, storitev in blaga v skladu s PDEU in to direktivo.
Patients should enjoy a guarantee of assumption of the costs of that healthcare at least at the level as would be provided for the same healthcare, had it been provided in the Member State of affiliation.
Pacientom bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da bodo stroški za navedeno zdravstveno varstvo kriti vsaj v višini zneska, ki bi bil zagotovljen za enako zdravstveno varstvo v državi članici zdravstvenega zavarovanja.
This should fully respect the responsibility of the Member States to determine the extent of the sickness cover available to their citizens and prevent any significant effect on the financing of the national healthcare systems.
Pri tem bi se morala v celoti spoštovati odgovornost držav članic, da določijo obseg kritja stroškov zdravstvenega varstva, ki je na voljo njihovim državljanom, in preprečevati kakršni koli bistveni učinek na financiranje nacionalnih sistemov zdravstvenega varstva.
For patients, therefore, the two systems should be coherent; either this Directive applies or the Union regulations on the coordination of social security systems apply.
Zato bi morala biti za paciente ta dva sistema koherentna; uporabi se bodisi ta direktiva bodisi uredbi Unije o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti.
Patients should not be deprived of the more beneficial rights guaranteed by the Union Regulations on the coordination of social security systems when the conditions are met.
Kadar so izpolnjeni pogoji, pacienti ne bi smeli izgubiti pravic do ugodnejše obravnave, ki je zagotovljena z uredbama Unije o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti.
Therefore, any patient who requests an authorisation to receive treatment appropriate to his condition in another Member State should always be granted this authorisation under the conditions provided for in the Unions regulations when the treatment in question is among the benefits provided for by the legislation in the Member State where the patient resides and when the patient cannot be given such treatment within a time limit that is medically justifiable, taking account of his current state of health and the probable course of the condition.
Vsakemu pacientu, ki zahteva odobritev zdravljenja, ki ustreza njegovemu zdravstvenemu stanju, v drugi državi članici, bi se le-to moralo v skladu s pogoji iz uredb Unije vedno odobriti, če je zadevno zdravljenje med storitvami, ki jih zagotavlja zakonodaja države članice, v kateri pacient biva, in če se tako zdravljenje pacientu ne more zagotoviti v roku, ki je utemeljen z medicinskega vidika, ob upoštevanju trenutnega zdravstvenega stanja pacienta in verjetnega poteka bolezni.
However, if a patient instead explicitly requests to seek treatment under the terms of this Directive, the benefits which apply to reimbursement should be limited to those which apply under this Directive.
Vendar če pacient namesto tega izrecno zahteva zdravljenje pod pogoji te direktive, bi morale biti storitve, za katere velja povračilo stroškov, omejene na storitve, ki veljajo v skladu s to direktivo.
Where the patient is entitled to cross-border healthcare under both this Directive and Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, and the application of that Regulation is more advantageous to the patient, the patient’s attention should be drawn to this by the Member State of affiliation.
Če je pacient upravičen do čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v skladu s to direktivo in hkrati z Uredbo (ES) št. 883/2004 ter je uporaba navedene uredbe bolj ugodna za pacienta, potem bi ga morala na to opozoriti država članica zdravstvenega zavarovanja.
Patients should, in any event, not derive a financial advantage from the healthcare provided in another Member State and the assumption of costs should be therefore limited only to the actual costs of healthcare received.
Pacienti v nobenem primeru ne bi smeli imeti finančnih koristi od zdravstvenega varstva v drugi državi članici, zato bi moral biti prevzem stroškov omejen samo na dejanske stroške za prejeto zdravstveno varstvo.
This Directive does not aim to create an entitlement to reimbursement of the costs of healthcare provided in another Member State, if such healthcare is not among the benefits provided for by the legislation of the Member State of affiliation of the insured person.
Ta direktiva ni namenjena uvedbi pravice do povračila stroškov zdravstvenega varstva, zagotovljenega v drugi državi članici, če takšnega zdravstvenega varstva ni med storitvami, ki jih zagotavlja zakonodaja države članice zdravstvenega zavarovanja zavarovane osebe.
Equally, this Directive should not prevent the Member States from extending their benefits-in-kind scheme to healthcare provided in another Member State.
Ta direktiva državam članicam prav tako ne bi smela preprečiti širitve njihovih sistemov storitev na zdravstveno varstvo zagotovljeno v drugi državi članici.
This Directive should recognise that Member States are free to organise their healthcare and social security systems in such a way as to determine entitlement for treatment at a regional or local level.
Ta direktiva bi morala priznati, da lahko države članice lastne sisteme zdravstvenega varstva in socialne varnosti organizirajo tako, da se pravica do zdravljenja določa na regionalni ali lokalni ravni.
Member States of affiliation should give patients the right to receive at least the same benefits in another Member State as those provided for by the legislation of the Member State of affiliation.
Države članice zdravstvenega zavarovanja bi morale pacientom omogočiti pravico, da v drugi državi članici koristijo storitve, ki so vsaj enake storitvam, zagotovljenim z zakonodajo države članice zdravstvenega zavarovanja zavarovane osebe.
If the list of benefits does not specify precisely the treatment method applied but defines types of treatment, the Member State of affiliation should not refuse prior authorisation or reimbursement on the grounds that the treatment method is not available in its territory, but should assess if the cross-border treatment sought or received corresponds to benefits provided for in its legislation.
Če v seznamu storitev ni natančno določena metoda zdravljenja, ki se uporablja, ampak so opredeljene vrste zdravljenja, država članica zdravstvenega zavarovanja ne bi smela zavrniti predhodne odobritve ali povračila iz razlogov, da metoda zdravljenja ni razpoložljiva na njenem ozemlju, ampak bi morala oceniti, ali zahtevano ali prejeto čezmejno zdravljenje ustreza storitvam, določenim v njeni zakonodaji.
The fact that the obligation to reimburse cross-border healthcare under this Directive is limited to such healthcare that is among the benefits to which the patient is entitled within its Member State of affiliation does not preclude Member States from reimbursing the cost of cross-border healthcare beyond those limits.
Dejstvo, da je obveznost povračila stroškov čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva v skladu s to direktivo omejena na storitve zdravstvenega varstva, do katerih je pacient upravičen v državi članici zdravstvenega zavarovanja, ne preprečuje državam članicam, da povrnejo stroške čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva, tudi če so ti višji.
Member States are free, for example, to reimburse extra costs, such as accommodation and travel costs, or extra costs incurred by persons with disabilities even where those costs are not reimbursed in the case of healthcare provided in their territory.
Države članice se lahko svobodno odločijo, da na primer povrnejo dodatne stroške, kot so stroški nastanitve, potni stroški ali dodatni stroški invalidnih oseb, tudi če se ti stroški v primeru zdravstvenega varstva, zagotovljenega na njihovem ozemlju, ne povrnejo.
This Directive should not provide either for the transfer of social security entitlements between Member States or other coordination of social security systems.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela določati prenosa pravic socialne varnosti med državami članicami ali druge koordinacije sistemov socialne varnosti.
The sole objective of the provisions regarding prior authorisation and reimbursement of healthcare provided in another Member State should be to enable freedom to provide healthcare for patients and to remove unjustified obstacles to that fundamental freedom within the patient’s Member State of affiliation.
Edini cilj določb v zvezi s predhodno odobritvijo in povračilom stroškov za zdravstveno varstvo v drugi državi članici bi moral biti zagotoviti svobodo zagotavljanja zdravstvenega varstva pacientom ter odpraviti neutemeljene ovire za navedeno temeljno svoboščino v državi članici pacientovega zdravstvenega zavarovanja.
Consequently this Directive should fully respect the differences in national healthcare systems and the Member States’ responsibilities for the organisation and delivery of health services and medical care.
Posledično bi morala ta direktiva v celoti upoštevati razlike v nacionalnih sistemih zdravstvenega varstva ter odgovornosti držav članic pri organizaciji in izvajanju zdravstvenih storitev in zdravstvene oskrbe.