natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some parties also highlighted the situation of SMEs, claiming that SMEs have difficulties in sourcing their raw materials because they do not reach the minimum order quantities required by producers.
Nekatere strani so prav tako opozorile na položaj MSP in trdile, da imajo te težave pri nabavi surovin, ker ne dosegajo najmanjših količin naročil, ki jih zahtevajo proizvajalci.
In this respect, it is noted that difficulties regarding minimum order quantities appear to be an existing pattern of business regardless of the imposition of measures.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da je pri težavah v zvezi z najmanjšimi količinami naročil videti, da gre za obstoječ vzorec poslovanja ne glede na uvedbo ukrepov.
Therefore it is considered that the imposition of duties would not per se affect the already established business patterns among economic operators.
Zato se šteje, da uvedba dajatev sama po sebi ne bo vplivala na že vzpostavljene vzorce poslovanja med gospodarskimi subjekti.
Therefore, these claims were not considered warranted.
Zato se te trditve niso štele za utemeljene.
Finally, some interested parties claimed that the Union industry would not represent a reliable source due to the incompleteness of its product range, the lower quality and the higher prices of products.
Ne nazadnje so nekatere zainteresirane strani trdile, da industrija Unije ne bi bila zanesljiv vir zaradi nepopolnosti ponudbe izdelkov, nižje kakovosti in višjih cen izdelkov.
In this respect it is noted that even if Union producers were not able to supply the full range of products required, alternative supply sources exist which should allow completing product ranges.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da tudi če proizvajalci Unije ne bi mogli dobaviti vseh zahtevanih izdelkov, obstajajo drugi viri dobave, ki bi morali omogočati dopolnitev ponudbe izdelkov.
Moreover, the relatively low duty level should not prohibit users to complete their product range by continuing to recur to imports from the PRC as well.
Poleg tega relativno nizka stopnja dajatve uporabnikom ne bi smela preprečiti, da dopolnijo svojo ponudbo izdelkov tako, da še naprej posegajo tudi po uvozu iz LRK.
In addition, the recent reopening of factories, as mentioned above, should contribute to address this concern insofar as it would allow for a bigger capacity being allocated to the manufacturing of a wider range of products.
Tudi nedavna ponovna odprtja tovarn, kot je navedeno zgoraj, bi morala prispevati k reševanju te težave, če bi omogočala večjo zmogljivost proizvodnje večje ponudbe izdelkov.
As regards the claim on the effect of measures on the downstream industry, and consequently on employment in the Union, it is considered that in view of the above, the impact should be negligible.
Kar zadeva trditev o učinku ukrepov na industrijo na koncu proizvodne verige in posledično na zaposlitev v Uniji, se šteje, da bi glede na navedeno vpliv moral biti zanemarljiv.
Based on the above, it was concluded that there are no compelling reasons against the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties against imports of HTY originating in the PRC.
Glede na navedeno je bilo sklenjeno, da ni utemeljenih razlogov, ki bi nasprotovali uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz PVT s poreklom iz LRK.
In the absence of any substantiated comments that would alter the conclusion regarding the injury elimination level, recitals 179 to 183 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo utemeljenih pripomb, ki bi spremenile sklep glede stopnje odprave škode, se uvodne izjave od 179 do 183 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed in respect of imports of HTY originating in the PRC at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe dokončne protidampinške ukrepe uvesti za uvoz PVT s poreklom iz LRK na ravni nižjih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
Accordingly, all duty rates should be set at the level of the dumping margins found.
V skladu s tem bi morale biti vse stopnje dajatev določene na ravni ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga.
Given that the dumping margins established for Korea and Taiwan were below the de minimis level, no definitive anti-dumping duties are to be imposed on imports originating in Korea and Taiwan.
Glede na to, da so bile stopnje dampinga, določene za Korejo in Tajvan, pod mejo de minimis, dokončne protidampinške dajatve ne bodo uvedene na uvoz s poreklom iz Koreje in s Tajvana.
Cooperating companies not included in the sample
Sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec
All other companies in the PRC
Vse druge družbe v LRK
Any claim requesting the application of an individual company anti-dumping duty rate (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [3] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo za navedeno družbo določene stopnje protidampinške dajatve (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) bi bilo treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [3] skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi podatki, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezane na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will then be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Uredba bo po potrebi ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama družb, upravičenih do posameznih stopenj dajatve.
The comments submitted by the parties were duly considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Po ustrezni preučitvi pripomb, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
In order to ensure equal treatment between any new exporters and the cooperating companies not included in the sample, mentioned in the Annex to this Regulation, provision should be made for the weighted average duty imposed on the latter companies to be applied to any new exporters which would otherwise be entitled to a review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation as Article 11(4) does not apply where sampling has been used.
Za zagotovitev enake obravnave katerih koli novih izvoznikov in sodelujočih družb, ki niso vključeni v vzorec, navedenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi, bi bilo treba sprejeti določbe za tehtano povprečno dajatev, ki se uvede za navedene družbe, ki se morajo uporabiti za katerega koli novega izvoznika, ki bi bil sicer upravičen do pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe, saj člen 11(4) ne velja, kadar se uporabi vzorčenje.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation, be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the definitive duties imposed.
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Unije, se šteje, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, ki je bila uvedena z začasno uredbo, dokončno poberejo v višini zneska uvedenih dokončnih dajatev.
In view of the findings regarding imports originating in Korea and Taiwan, the proceeding with respect to these two countries shall be terminated,
Glede na ugotovitve o uvozu s poreklom iz Koreje in s Tajvana se postopek v zvezi s tema državama zaključi –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters (other than sewing thread), not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of less than 67 decitex, currently falling within CN code 54022000 and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra (razen šivalne preje), ki ni pripravljena za prodajo na drobno, vključno z monofilamenti številke manj kot 67 deciteksov, trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN 54022000, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 and produced by the companies below shall be as follows:
Stopnje dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporabljajo za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve za izdelek iz odstavka 1, ki ga proizvajajo navedene družbe, so:
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan is hereby terminated.
Protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom preje visoke trdnosti po poreklu iz Republike Koreje in s Tajvana je zaključen.
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 478/2010 on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters (other than sewing thread), not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of less than 67 decitex currently falling within CN code 54022000 and originating in the People’s Republic of China shall be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive duty imposed pursuant to Article 1.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 478/2010 na uvoz preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra (razen šivalne preje), ki ni pripravljena za prodajo na drobno, vključno z monofilamenti številke manj kot 67 deciteksov, trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN 54022000, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske se dokončno poberejo po stopnji dokončne dajatve, uvedene v skladu s členom 1.
it did not export to the Union the product described in Article 1(1) during the investigation period (1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009),
izdelka, opisanega v členu 1(1), v obdobju preiskave (od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009) ni izvažal v Unijo,
it has actually exported to the Union the product concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Union,
je zadevni izdelek dejansko izvažal v Unijo po obdobju preiskave, na kateri temeljijo ukrepi, ali da je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da izvozi znatno količino v Unijo,
the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amend Article 1(2) by adding the new exporting producer to the cooperating companies not included in the sample and thus subject to the weighted average duty rate of 5,3 %.
lahko Svet z navadno večino in na predlog Komisije ter po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom spremeni člen 1(2) tako, da na seznam sodelujočih družb, ki niso vključene v vzorec in za katere velja tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 5,3 %, doda novega proizvajalca izvoznika.
OJ L 135, 2.6.2010, p. 3.
UL L 135, 2.6.2010, str. 3.
In particular it emerged that the purchase prices sharply declined in particular in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Predvsem se je izkazalo, da so se nabavne cene močno znižale zlasti v četrtem četrtletju leta 2008.
Hence it claimed that this should be taken into account when establishing its normal values in order to ensure a fair comparison with the export prices.
Zato je trdil, da bi bilo to treba upoštevati pri določitvi njegovih normalnih vrednosti, da bi bila zagotovljena poštena primerjava z izvoznimi cenami.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, Office N105 04/090, 1049 Brussels, Belgium.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, Office N105 04/090, 1049 Bruselss, Belgium.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1106/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1106/2010
establishing the list of measures to be excluded from the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 485/2008 on scrutiny by Member States of transactions forming part of the system of financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund
o seznamu ukrepov, ki so izvzeti iz uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 485/2008 o pregledu transakcij, ki so del sistema financiranja Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada, s strani držav članic
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 485/2008 of 26 May 2008 on scrutiny by Member States of transactions forming part of the system of financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund [1], and in particular Article 1(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 485/2008 z dne 26. maja 2008 o pregledu transakcij, ki so del sistema financiranja Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada, s strani držav članic [1] in zlasti člena 1(2) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 485/2008 relates to scrutiny of the commercial documents of those entities receiving or making payments relating directly or indirectly to the system of financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), in order to ascertain whether transactions forming part of the system of financing by the EAGF have actually been carried out and have been executed correctly.
Uredba (ES) št. 485/2008 velja za pregled trgovinskih dokumentov tistih subjektov, ki prejemajo ali izvajajo plačila, neposredno ali posredno povezana s sistemom financiranja Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS), da bi preverili, ali so se transakcije, ki so del sistema financiranja EKJS, dejansko in pravilno izvajale.
It is however appropriate to exclude from the application of that Regulation those measures which are by their nature unsuited to ex post control by way of scrutiny of commercial documents.
Vendar je primerno izključiti iz uporabe navedene uredbe tiste ukrepe, ki po svoji naravi niso primerni za naknadno kontrolo v obliki pregleda trgovinskih dokumentov.
A list of exempted measures is currently set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2311/2000 of 18 October 2000 establishing the list of measures to which Council Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89 does not apply and repealing Decision 96/284/EC [2].
Seznam izvzetih ukrepov trenutno določa Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2311/2000 z dne 18. oktobra 2000 o seznamu ukrepov, za katere se Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 4045/89 ne uporablja, in o razveljavitvi Odločbe 96/284/ES [2].
Given the changes occurred in the agricultural legislation, it is necessary to update that list.
Zaradi sprememb v kmetijski zakonodaji je treba posodobiti navedeni seznam.
Certain measures are concerned with payments that are either area related or unrelated to commercial documents that can be subject to scrutiny.
Nekateri ukrepi se nanašajo na plačila, ki so vezana na površino ali plačila, za katere ni trgovinskih dokumentov, ki so lahko predmet pregleda.
It is accordingly appropriate to exclude such measures from the scope of application of Regulation (EC) No 485/2008.
Zato je primerno izključiti take ukrepe iz obsega uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 485/2008.
Account should be taken that certain measures previously financed through the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (Guarantee Section) are now financed through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) as established by Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [3].
Treba je upoštevati nekatere ukrepe, ki so se prej financirali iz Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (Jamstveni oddelek) in se zdaj financirajo iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP), kot je določeno v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [3].
For reasons of clarity, Regulation (EC) No 2311/2000 should be repealed and replaced by a new text.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba Uredbo (ES) št. 2311/2000 razveljaviti in nadomestiti z novim besedilom.
The system of scrutinies established by Regulation (EC) No 485/2008 does not apply to the measures listed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Sistem pregledov, vzpostavljenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 485/2008, se ne uporablja za ukrepe, naštete v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Regulation (EC) No 2311/2000 is repealed.
Uredba (ES) št. 2311/2000 se razveljavi.
OJ L 265, 19.10.2000, p. 10.
UL L 265, 19.10.2000, str. 10.
Measures to which the system of scrutiny pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 485/2008 does not apply
Ukrepi, za katere se sistem pregledov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 485/2008 ne uporablja
Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) [1] with respect to:(a) the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre, in so far as the aid provided for in Article 91 of that Regulation is paid to the farmer;
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode („Uredba o enotni SUT“) [1] glede na:(a) skupno ureditev trgov za lan in konopljo, ki se ju goji za vlakna, če je pomoč iz člena 91 navedene uredbe plačana kmetu;
the following measures of the common organisation of the market in the wine sector:
naslednje ukrepe skupne ureditve trga v vinskem sektorju:
grubbing up scheme in accordance with Articles 85o to 85x thereof;
program krčenja v skladu s členi 85o do 85x Uredbe;
Single Payment Scheme support in accordance with Article 103o thereof;
podporo iz sheme enotnih plačil v skladu s členom 103o Uredbe;
restructuring and conversion of vineyards in accordance with Article 103q thereof;
prestrukturiranje in preusmeritev vinogradov v skladu s členom 103q Uredbe;
green harvesting in accordance with Article 103r thereof;
zelena trgatev v skladu s členom 103r Uredbe;
potable alcohol distillation in accordance with Article 103w thereof.
destilacijo pitnega alkohola v skladu s členom 103w Uredbe.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1107/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1107/2010
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pimiento de Gernika or Gernikako Piperra (PGI))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Pimiento de Gernika ou Gernikako Piperra (ZGO))
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pimiento de Gernika’ or ‘Gernikako Piperra’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Španije za registracijo imena „Pimiento de Gernika“ ali „Gernikako Piperra“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
OJ C 94, 14.4.2010, p. 23.
UL C 94, 14.4.2010, str. 23.
Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed
Sveže ali predelano sadje, zelenjava in žito
Pimiento de Gernika or Gernikako Piperra (PGI)
Pimiento de Gernika ali Gernikako Piperra (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1108/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1108/2010
approving a non-minor amendment to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Castagna del Monte Amiata (PGI))
o odobritvi večjih sprememb specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Castagna del Monte Amiata (ZGO))
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and in accordance with Article 17(2) thereof, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of an amendment to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Castagna del Monte Amiata’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 [2], as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1904/2000 [3].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 9(1) in členom 17(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je Komisija proučila vlogo Italije za odobritev spremembe specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Castagna del Monte Amiata“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2400/96 [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1904/2000 [3].
Since the amendment in question is not minor within the meaning of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] as required by the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of that Regulation.
Ker zadevna sprememba ni manjša v smislu člena 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, je Komisija v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 6(2) navedene uredbe vlogo za spremembo objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4].
OJ C 60, 11.3.2010, p. 15.
UL C 60, 11.3.2010, str. 15.
Class 1.6
Skupina 1.6
Castagna del Monte Amiata (PGI)
Castagna del Monte Amiata (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1109/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1109/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 December 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 1. decembra 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1110/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1110/2010
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 December 2010
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 1. decembra 2010
Import duties should be fixed for the period from 1 December 2010 and should apply until new import duties are fixed and enter into force,
Uvozne dajatve, ki se uporabljajo, dokler ne začne veljati nova določitev, se določijo za obdobje z začetkom 1. decembra 2010 –
From 1 December 2010, the import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information contained in Annex II.
Od 1. decembra 2010 so uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 dajatve, določene v Prilogi I k tej uredbi na podlagi podatkov, navedenih v Prilogi II.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 1 December 2010
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 1. decembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1111/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1111/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1087/2010 [4]
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1087/2010 [4].
OJ L 310, 26.11.2010, p. 9.
UL L 310, 26.11.2010, str. 9.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 1 December 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 1. decembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1112/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1112/2010
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 of 30 January 2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions in the Union [1], and in particular Article 25 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 247/2006 z dne 30. januarja 2006 o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije [1] in zlasti člena 25 Uredbe,
Following the adoption of Commission Regulation (EC) No 408/2009 [2] amending Regulation (EC) No 793/2006, and in particular Article 46a thereof, which specifies that reconstituted UHT milk intended for local consumption in Madeira is to incorporate at least 15 % of fresh cow’s milk, it has emerged that all the fresh milk produced locally is used by the local cheese industry.
Po sprejetju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 408/2009 [2] in zlasti člena 46a, v skladu s katerim mora obnovljeno sterilizirano mleko, namenjeno lokalni porabi na Madeiri, vsebovati najmanj 15 % svežega kravjega mleka, se je izkazalo, da celotno količino lokalno proizvedenega svežega mleka porabi lokalna sirarska industrija.