natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having received a complaint from Option NV (hereinafter ‘the applicant’), the Commission determined that there is sufficient evidence to justify initiation of a proceeding and therefore, pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation, announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (the ‘Notice of Initiation’) the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of wireless wide area networking (WWAN) modems originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Po prejemu pritožbe, ki jo je vložila družba Option NV (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik), je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostna dokazila, ki upravičujejo začetek postopka, zato je v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza modemov za brezžično prostrano omrežje (WWAN) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Concerning standing to lodge a complaint, the applicant is the sole producer of the product concerned in the European Union, representing 100 % of the total Union production.
Glede na izhodišče za vložitev pritožbe je vložnik edini proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka v Evropski uniji in predstavlja 100 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
As regards dumping, in view of the provisions of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, the country concerned is considered to be a non-market economy country.
V zvezi z dampingom se zadevna država glede na določbe člena 2(7) osnovne Uredbe šteje za državo brez tržnega gospodarstva.
In the absence of known production of the product concerned outside the European Union and the country concerned, the complainant established normal value for the country concerned on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product duly adjusted where necessary to include a reasonable profit margin.
Ker proizvodnja zadevnega izdelka zunaj Evropske unije in zadevne države ni znana, je vložnik normalno vrednost za zadevno državo izračunal na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo v Uniji za podoben izdelek, po potrebi ustrezno prilagojenih, tako da vključujejo razumno stopnjo dobička.
The allegation of dumping is based on a comparison of the normal value thus established with the export prices (at ex-works level) of the product under investigation when sold for export to the Union.
Trditev o dampingu temelji na primerjavi tako izračunane normalne vrednosti z izvoznimi cenami (na ravni franko tovarna) izdelka v preiskavi, ko je prodan za izvoz v Unijo.
On this basis the dumping margin calculated is significant for the exporting country concerned, namely in excess of 150 %.
Na podlagi tega je izračunana stopnja dampinga za zadevno državo izvoznico znatna, in sicer je presežek 150-odstoten.
The applicant also requests that imports of the product concerned are made subject to registration pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Vložnik prav tako zahteva, da se uvede registracija uvoza zadevnih izdelkov v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, tako da se ukrepi lahko pozneje uporabijo za naveden uvoz od datuma take registracije.
GROUNDS FOR THE REGISTRATION
RAZLOGI ZA REGISTRACIJO
According to Article 7(1) of the basic Regulation, provisional measures may not be imposed earlier than 60 days from initiation.
Začasnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 7(1) osnovne uredbe ni dovoljeno uvajati prej kot v 60 dneh po začetku postopka.
However, according to Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty may be levied on products which were entered for consumption not more than 90 days prior to the date of application of provisional measures, provided that the conditions set out in that paragraph are fulfilled, and imports have been registered in accordance with Article 14(5).
Vendar se v skladu s členom 10(4) osnovne uredbe dokončna protidampinška dajatev lahko zaračuna za izdelke, ki so bili uvoženi za potrošnjo največ 90 dni pred začetkom uporabe začasnih ukrepov, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz navedenega odstavka ter je uvoz registriran v skladu s členom 14(5).
According to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission may, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom carinskim organom naroči, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza, tako da se ukrepi nato lahko uporabijo proti navedenemu uvozu od datuma take registracije.
Imports may be made subject to registration following a request from the Union industry which contains sufficient evidence to justify such action.
Obvezna registracija uvoza se lahko uvede na podlagi zahtevka industrije Unije, ki vsebuje zadostna dokazila, ki upravičujejo tak ukrep.
The request contains sufficient evidence to justify registration.
Zahtevek vsebuje zadostna dokazila, ki upravičujejo registracijo.
This is further supported by evidence from other sources.
To še dodatno podpirajo dokazila iz drugih virov.
As regards dumping, the Commission has at its disposal sufficient prima facie evidence that imports of the product concerned originating in the People’s Republic of China are being dumped, and that the exporters practice dumping.
V zvezi z dampingom so Komisiji na voljo zadostni dokazi prima facie o dampinškem uvozu zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ter o tem, da izvozniki izvajajo damping.
This data, appropriately adjusted for estimated transport and other costs, would, on its face, appear to relate to the same product and time period and the same level of trade, and therefore would appear to be broadly comparable.
Videti je, da bi se ti podatki, ustrezno prilagojeni ocenjenemu prevozu in drugim stroškom, nanašali na enak izdelek, obdobje in enako raven trgovine, zato bi lahko bili splošno primerljivi.
As a whole, and given the extent of the dumping margin alleged, this evidence provides sufficient support at this stage that the exporters in question practice dumping, and that there was an history of dumping over an extended period of time.
Gledano kot celota in glede na domnevno stopnjo dampinga to dokazilo na tej stopnji zadostno kaže na to, da zadevni izvozniki izvajajo damping in da se je damping izvajal daljše obdobje.
As regards injury, the Commission has at its disposal sufficient prima facie evidence that the exporters’ dumping practices are causing material injury or would cause material injury.
Kar zadeva škodo, so Komisiji na voljo zadostni dokazi prima facie o tem, da dampinške prakse izvoznikov povzročajo materialno škodo ali da bi lahko povzročale materialno škodo.
This evidence consists of detailed data, contained in the anti-dumping complaint and request for registration and supported by information from other sources, concerning the key injury factors set out in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
To dokazilo je sestavljeno iz podrobnih podatkov, ki jih vsebujeta protidampinška pritožba in zahtevek za registracijo ter jih podpirajo informacije iz drugih virov, v zvezi s ključnimi dejavniki škode iz člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, the Commission has its disposal sufficient prima facie evidence that exporters’ practices are causing serious injury, or would cause serious injury.
Poleg tega so Komisiji na voljo zadostni dokazi prima facie o tem, da prakse izvoznikov povzročajo resno škodo ali da bi lahko povzročale resno škodo.
This has warranted initiation of a safeguard investigation.
To upravičuje začetek zaščitne preiskave.
It should be underlined that the totality of imports would appear to originate in the People's Republic of China.
Treba je poudariti, da je videti, da celoten uvoz izvira iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The Commission also has at its disposal sufficient prima facie evidence, contained in the anti-dumping complaint and request for registration and supported by information from other sources, that the importers were aware, or should have been aware, that the exporters practice dumping injurious to or likely to be injurious to the Union industry.
Komisiji so prav tako na voljo zadostni dokazi prima facie, ki jih vsebujeta protidampinška pritožba in zahtevek za registracijo ter jih podpirajo informacije iz drugih virov, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati, da je dampinška praksa izvoznikov škodljiva ali bi lahko bila škodljiva za industrijo Unije.
For instance, several articles in the specialist press over an extended period of time suggest that the Union industry may suffer injury as a result of low priced imports from China.
Številni članki v specializiranem tisku v daljšem časovnem obdobju na primer kažejo na to, da je industrija Unije lahko utrpela škodo zaradi poceni uvoza iz Kitajske.
Also, given the extent of the dumping that it would appear may be occurring, it is reasonable to conclude that the importers would be aware, or should be aware, of the situation.
Prav tako je glede na obseg dampinga, ki bi se lahko pojavil, mogoče sklepati, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati razmer.
Furthermore, the Commission has at its disposal sufficient prima facie evidence that such injury is being caused or would be caused by massive dumped imports in a relatively short time which in light of the timing and the volume of the dumped imports and other circumstances (such as the rapid deterioration of the situation of the Union industry [2], the fact that a single producer exists in the Union, the cycle of negotiation of contracts in this market, the relatively short lifetime of products in the sector, the significant amount of R&D expenses that must be undertaken to generate them) would be likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of any definitive anti-dumping duties, unless such duties would be applied retroactively.
Poleg tega so Komisiji na voljo zadostni dokazi prima facie, da takšno škodo povzroča ali bi jo lahko povzročal množični dampinški uvoz v relativno kratkem času, ki glede na časovni okvir, obseg dampinškega uvoza in druge okoliščine (kot so na primer hitro poslabšanje položaja industrije Unije [2], dejstvo, da je v Uniji samo en proizvajalec, krog pogajanj o pogodbah na tem trgu, relativno kratka življenjska doba izdelkov v sektorju, znatni izdatki za raziskave in razvoj, ki so potrebni za te izdelke) lahko resno ogrozijo popravljalni učinek dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, razen če bi se takšne dajatve uporabile retroaktivno.
Evidence in relation to these circumstances is contained in the anti-dumping complaint and request for registration and supported by information from other sources.
Dokazila v zvezi s temi okoliščinami so vključena v protidampinško pritožbo in zahtevek za registracijo ter podprta z informacijami iz drugih virov.
Accordingly, the conditions for registration in this case are met.
Glede na to so pogoji za registracijo v tem primeru izpolnjeni.
In the light of the above, the Commission has concluded that the applicant’s request contains sufficient evidence to make imports of the product concerned subject to registration, in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na navedeno sklenila, da vložnikov zahtevek vsebuje zadostna dokazila za uvedbo registracije uvoza zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe.
All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing and to provide supporting evidence.
Vse zainteresirane strani so vabljene, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zagotovijo ustrezna dokazila.
Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request in writing and show that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.
Poleg tega lahko Komisija zasliši zainteresirane strani, če te vložijo pisni zahtevek in v njem navedejo posebne razloge, zaradi katerih bi morale biti zaslišane.
Pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product concerned should be made subject to registration in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings leading to the imposition of anti-dumping duties, those duties, can, if the necessary conditions are fulfilled, be levied retroactively in accordance with applicable legal provisions.
V skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka, da se, če bodo rezultati preiskave privedli do uvedbe protidampinških dajatev, navedene dajatve lahko zaračunajo retroaktivno v skladu z veljavnimi pravnimi določbami, če so izpolnjeni potrebni pogoji.
Any future liability would emanate from the findings of the anti-dumping investigation.
Vsakršna nadaljnja odgovornost mora izhajati iz ugotovitev protidampinške preiskave.
The allegations in the complaint requesting the initiation of an investigation exceed 150 % for dumping and 150 % for injury.
Trditve v pritožbi, ki zahteva začetek preiskave, presegajo stopnjo 150 % za damping in 150 % za škodo.
If the investigation confirms these allegations, the measure would exceed EUR 60 per unit.
Če preiskava te trditve potrdi, bo ukrep presegel 60 EUR na enoto.
Any personal data collected in this investigation will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [3],
Vsi osebni podatki, zbrani v tej preiskavi, bodo obdelani v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [3] –
The Customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union of wireless wide area networking (WWAN) modems with a radio antenna and providing Internet Protocol (IP) data connectivity for computing devices and including Wi-Fi routers comprising a WWAN modem (WWAN/Wi-Fi routers) originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex84718000 and ex85176200 (TARIC codes 8471800010, 8517620011 and 8517620091).
Carinskim organom se v skladu s členom 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 dajo navodila, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza v Unijo modemov za brezžično prostrano omrežje (WWAN) z radijsko anteno in povezljivostjo prek podatkov internetnega protokola (IP) za računalniške naprave, vključno z usmerjevalniki Wi-Fi z modemom WWAN (usmerjevalniki WWAN/Wi-Fi), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščenih pod oznaki KN ex84718000 in ex85176200 (oznake TARIC 8471800010, 8517620011 in 8517620091).
All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing, to provide supporting evidence or to request to be heard within 20 days from the date of publication of this Regulation.
Vse zainteresirane strani so pozvane, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča, zagotovijo ustrezna dokazila ali zaprosijo za zaslišanje v 20 dneh od datuma objave te uredbe.
The Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Examples of this rapid deterioration can be found in the complaint requesting the initiation of an anti-dumping investigation.
Primeri tega hitrega poslabšanja so navedeni v pritožbi, ki zahteva začetek protidampinške preiskave.
They include inter alia the halving of production, the multiplication by a factor of ca. 4 of financial losses and the drop of ca. 40 % in employment from 2008 to 2009.
Med drugim vključujejo prepolovitev proizvodnje, finančne izgube, pomnožene s faktorjem približno 4, in približno 40-odstotno zmanjšanje števila delovnih mest med letom 2008 in 2009.
The anti-dumping complaint and request for registration contain evidence with regard to export prices relating to the period from second quarter of 2009 to first quarter of 2010.
Protidampinška pritožba in zahtevek za registracijo vsebujeta dokazila glede izvoznih cen v zvezi z obdobjem od drugega četrtletja leta 2009 do prvega četrtletja leta 2010.
In addition, the complaint contains information regarding export prices from 2006 onwards.
Pritožba poleg tega vsebuje informacije o izvoznih cenah od leta 2006 naprej.
The evidence regarding normal value, contained in the anti-dumping complaint and request for registration, at this stage and subject to further data becoming available during the investigation, consists of detailed data concerning domestic prices and costs of production from the single Union producer covering the period from 2006 to the first quarter of 2010.
Dokazila o normalni vrednosti iz protidampinške pritožbe in zahtevka za registracijo na tej stopnji in glede na nadaljnje podatke, ki bodo na voljo med preiskavo, so sestavljena iz podrobnih podatkov o domačih cenah in stroških proizvodnje edinega proizvajalca v Uniji v obdobju od leta 2006 do prvega četrtletja leta 2010.
In the absence of any known analogue countries which could serve as a basis for reliable normal value, this is the most accurate and adequate information that can be used at this stage.
Ker ni nobene znane primerljive države, ki bi lahko bila podlaga za zanesljivo normalno vrednost, so to najbolj natančne in ustrezne informacije, ki se lahko uporabijo na tej stopnji.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 571/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 571/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 June 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 30. junija 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 572/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 572/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 563/2010 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 563/2010 [4].
OJ L 161, 29.6.2010, p. 4.
UL L 161, 29.6.2010, str. 4.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 30 June 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 30. junija 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 573/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 573/2010
amending Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 185/2010 o določitvi podrobnih ukrepov za izvajanje skupnih osnovnih standardov za varnost letalstva
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 [1] and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2008 o skupnih pravilih na področju varovanja civilnega letalstva in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002 [1] ter zlasti člena 4(3) Uredbe,
Commission Regulations (EC) No 1217/2003 of 4 July 2003 laying down common specifications for national civil aviation security quality control programmes [3], (EC) No 1486/2003 of 22 August 2003 laying down procedures for conducting Commission inspections in the field of civil aviation security [4], (EC) No 1138/2004 of 21 June 2004 establishing a common definition of critical parts of security restricted areas at airports [5] and (EC) No 820/2008 of 8 August 2008 laying down measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security [6], which all implemented Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security [7] should therefore be repealed.
Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1217/2003 z dne 4. julija 2003 o določitvi skupnih zahtev za nacionalne programe obvladovanja kakovosti na področju varnosti civilnega letalstva [3], (ES) št. 1486/2003 z dne 22. avgusta 2003 o določitvi postopkov za izvajanje inšpekcijskih pregledov Komisije na področju varnosti civilnega letalstva [4], (ES) št. 1138/2004 z dne 21. junija 2004 o uvedbi skupne opredelitve kritičnih delov varnostnih območij omejenega gibanja na letališčih [5] in (ES) št. 820/2008 z dne 8. avgusta 2008 o določitvi ukrepov za izvajanje skupnih osnovnih standardov za varnost letalstva, [6] ki so vse izvajale Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2320/2002 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o določitvi skupnih pravil na področju varnosti civilnega letalstva [7], je zato treba razveljaviti.
Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 permits that, notwithstanding the general rule that the Commission shall publish measures that have a direct impact on passengers, certain measures containing aviation security sensitive information may be classified in accordance with Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 29 November 2001 amending internal rules of procedure, and not published.
Člen 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 dovoljuje, da so lahko ne glede na to, da Komisija praviloma objavi ukrepe, ki imajo neposreden vpliv na potnike, nekateri ukrepi, ki vsebujejo občutljive informacije glede varnosti letalstva, zaupni v skladu s Sklepom Komisije 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom z dne 29. novembra 2001 o spremembah njenega poslovnika, in se ne objavijo.
These measures should be adopted separately, by means of a Decision addressed to Member States.
Te ukrepe je treba sprejeti ločeno s sklepom, naslovljenim na države članice.
The part of the Decision which contains security sensitive measures and procedures should not be published and should be made available only to those operators and entities with legitimate interest.
Del sklepa, ki vsebuje občutljive varnostne ukrepe in postopke, se ne sme objaviti in se lahko da na voljo samo operaterjem in subjektom z upravičenim interesom.
Such measures include, in particular, certain detailed procedures and exemptions there from, concerning the way aircrafts, vehicles, persons, baggage, mail and cargo are controlled when entering or within security restricted areas as well as the technical specifications for screening equipment.
Takšni ukrepi zadevajo zlasti nekatere podrobne postopke in njihove izjeme glede tega, kako se nadzorujejo zrakoplovi, vozila, osebe, prtljaga, pošta in tovor ob vstopu na varnostno območje omejenega gibanja ali na tem območju, ter tehnične specifikacije za opremo za pregledovanje.
This Regulation shall enter into force and apply from the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati in se uporabljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Annex to Regulation (EU) No 185/2010 [1] is amended as follows:A.
Priloga k Uredbi (EU) št. 185/2010 [1] se spremeni:A.
In Chapter 4, point 4.1.1.2 (c) is added:
V poglavju 4 se doda točka 4.1.1.2(c):
explosive detection dogs in combination with point (a).’
s psi za odkrivanje eksplozivov v kombinaciji s točko (a).“
In Chapter 4, point 4.1.1.9 is added:
V poglavju 4 se doda točka 4.1.1.9:
Explosive detection dogs may only be used as a supplementary means of screening.’
Psi za odkrivanje eksplozivov se lahko uporabljajo le kot dopolnilno sredstvo varnostnega pregleda.“
In Chapter 4, point 4.1.2.3 (d) is added:
V poglavju 4 se doda točka 4.1.2.3(d):
In Chapter 5, point 5.1.1 (e) is added:
V poglavju 5 se doda točka 5.1.1(e):
explosive detection dogs.’
psi za odkrivanje eksplozivov.“
In Chapter 12, point 9 is added:
V poglavju 12 se doda točka 9:
EXPLOSIVE DETECTION DOGS
PSI ZA ODKRIVANJE EKSPLOZIVOV
An explosive detection dog (EDD) shall be able to detect and indicate specified and higher individual quantities of explosive material.
Pes za odkrivanje eksplozivov (EDD) je sposoben odkriti in nakazati določene in večje posamezne količine eksplozivne snovi.