natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The State funding cost for EUR deposits will be set as a sum of short-term floating base rate that corresponds to respective term EURIBOR/EUR mid-SWAP rate and fixed spread is calculated as average weighted credit risk spread over benchmark EURIBOR/mid-swap rate for the Treasury’s borrowings over the previous calendar half-year that represents the central government’s actual funding costs; and for LVL deposits it will be set as a yield of the most recently issued domestic Treasury bills or bonds.
Stroški financiranja države za depozite v EUR bodo določeni kot vsota kratkoročne spremenljive obrestne mere, ki ustreza srednji menjalni obrestni meri EURIBOR/EUR, fiksni pribitek pa se izračuna kot tehtano povprečje tveganja spremembe kreditnega razpona po referenčni vrednosti EURIBOR/srednji menjalni obrestni meri za posojila iz državne zakladnice v predhodnem koledarskem polletju, ki pomeni dejanske stroške financiranja za državni proračun; za depozite v LVL pa bo določen kot donos najnovejših izdanih menic ali obveznic državne zakladnice.
In any case the fixed spread should not be less than for the most recent public borrowing of the bank: debt issues and/or syndicated loans carried out by the bank in the money and capital markets (currently 3,5 % based on the initial spread over 2-year EUR mid SWAP rate for the notes issued by the bank).
V nobenem primeru fiksni odbitek ne sme biti nižji od najnovejšega javnega zadolževanja banke: izdaj obveznic in/ali sindiciranih posojil, ki jih banka izvede na denarnih in kapitalskih trgih (trenutno 3,5 % na podlagi prvotnega razpona dveletne srednje menjalne obrestne mere v EUR za zadolžnice, ki jih izda banka).
See the second rescue Decision, recital 15.
Glej drugo odločbo o reševanju, uvodna izjava 15.
See the second rescue Decision, recital 38 and the third rescue Decision, recital 13.
Glej drugo odločbo o reševanju, uvodna izjava 38, in tretjo odločbo o reševanju, uvodna izjava 13.
The Lithuanian subsidiary of Citadele banka.
Litovska hčerinska družba banke Citadele.
As amended by the second rescue Decision and the third rescue Decision.
Kakor je bila spremenjena z drugo in tretjo odločbo o reševanju.
See Communication from the Commission – Application of the State Aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis, OJ C 270, 25.10.2008, p. 8; Communication from the Commission – Recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis: limitation of aid to the minimum necessary and safeguards against undue distortions of competition, OJ C 10, 15.1.2009, p. 2, and Communication from the Commission on the Treatment of Impaired Assets in the Community banking sector, OJ C 72, 26.3.2009, p. 1.
Glej Sporočilo Komisije – Uporaba pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe v zvezi s finančnimi institucijami v okviru trenutne svetovne finančne krize, UL C 270, 25.10.2008, str. 8. Sporočilo Komisije – Dokapitalizacija finančnih institucij v trenutni finančni krizi: omejitev pomoči na najmanjšo potrebno in zaščitni ukrepi za preprečevanje neupravičenega izkrivljanja konkurence, UL C 10, 15.1.2009, str. 2. in Sporočilo Komisije o obravnavanju oslabljenih sredstev v bančnem sektorju Skupnosti, UL C 72, 26.3.2009, str. 1.
See, for example, Commission Decision of 28 October 2009 on the State aid C 14/08 (ex NN 1/08) implemented by the United Kingdom for Northern Rock, OJ L 112, 5.5.2010, p. 38.
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije z dne 28. oktobra 2009 o državni pomoči C 14/2008 (ex NN 1/2008) Združenega kraljestva za Northern Rock, UL L 112, 5.5.2010, str. 38.
As of 30 April 2008.
Na dan 30. aprila 2008.
See Commission Decision of 21 October 2008 in case C 10/08, IKB, OJ L 278, 23.10.2009, p. 32, at recital 113, Commission Decision of 3 December 2008 in case NN 42/08, NN 46/08 and NN/53/A/08, Fortis Banque & Fortis Banque Luxembourg, at recital 95, Commission Decision of 9 July 2009 in case N 344/09 and N 380/09 Kaupthing Luxembourg, at recital 79, Commission Decision of 25 January 2010 in case NN 19/09 Dunfermline, at recitals 126 and 130 and Commission Decision of 28 October 2009 in case C 14/08 (ex No NN 1/08) Restructuring aid to Northern Rock, OJ L 112, 5.5.2010, at recital 162.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 21. oktobra 2008 v zadevi C 10/2008, IKB, UL L 278, 23.10.2009, str. 32. uvodna izjava 113, Odločbo Komisije z dne 3. decembra 2008 v zadevah NN 42/2008, NN 46/2008 in NN/53/A/2008, Fortis Banque & Fortis Banque Luxembourg, uvodna izjava 95, Odločbo Komisije z dne 9. julija 2009 v zadevah N 344/2009 in N 380/2009, Kaupthing Luxembourg, uvodna izjava 79, Odločbo Komisije z dne 25. januarja 2010 v zadevi NN 19/2009, Dunfermline, uvodni izjavi 126 in 130, ter Odločbo Komisije z dne 28. oktobra 2009 v zadevi C 14/2008 (ex No NN 1/2008), Pomoč za prestrukturiranje za Northern Rock, UL L 112, 5.5.2010, uvodna izjava 162.
Swedbank and SEB alone account for 36 % of the market.
Samo Swedbank in SEB imata 36-odstotni tržni delež.
Together with Nordea and DnB Nord they make up for 56 % of bank assets and 63 % of loans.
Skupaj z bankama Nordea in DnB Nord obsegata 56 % bančnih sredstev in 63 % posojil.
Only the deposit market seems less concentrated, with these four banks accounting for 37 %.
Zdi se, da je manj koncentriran samo depozitni trg, na katerem imajo te štiri banke 37-odstotni delež.
See also footnote 6.
Glej tudi opombo 6.
By letter of 12 August 2009, the Latvian authorities requested that the deadline for the submission of additional information set in the opening Decision be extended until 15 October 2009.
Latvijski organi so v dopisu z dne 12. avgusta 2009 zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za predložitev dodatnih informacij, določenega v odločitvi o začetku postopka, do 15. oktobra 2009.
On 4 September 2009 they presented a revised restructuring plan for Parex banka along with additional information as a response to the opening Decision.
Kot odgovor na odločitev o sprožitvi postopka so 4. septembra 2009 predložili spremenjen načrt prestrukturiranja za banko Parex z dodatnimi informacijami.
Latvia replied by letter of 7 July 2010.
Latvija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 7. julija 2010.
With this letter Latvia submitted also an updated version of the restructuring plan of 31 March 2010.
Skupaj s tem dopisom je predložila tudi posodobljeno različico načrta prestrukturiranja z dne 31. marca 2010.
The restructuring plan was subsequently amended on 18 and 27 August 2010 (hereinafter ‘final restructuring plan’).
Načrt prestrukturiranja je bil spremenjen še 18. in 27. avgusta 2010 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: končni načrt prestrukturiranja).
The financial crisis severely affected emerging markets including the CIS countries, and rumours circulated regarding the ability of Parex banka to refinance its syndicated loans maturing in February 2009.
Finančna kriza je močno prizadela hitrorastoče trge, vključno z državami SND, in krožiti so začele govorice o zmožnosti banke Parex za refinanciranje sindiciranih posojil, dospelih februarja 2009.
A combination of these events resulted in a loss of depositor confidence especially among non-resident clients prompting a run on the bank.
Zaradi spleta teh dogodkov se je zaupanje vlagateljev močno zmanjšalo zlasti pri tujih strankah, kar je izzvalo množično dvigovanje depozitov.
In 2008, consolidated losses were LVL 131 million (EUR 185 million) compared to a profit of LVL 40 million (EUR 58 million) in 2007.
Konsolidirane izgube so leta 2008 znašale 131 milijonov LVL (185 milijonov EUR) v primerjavi z dobičkom v višini 40 milijonov LVL (58 milijonov EUR) v letu 2007.
By the end of 2008 total shareholders’ equity was 65 % lower than the previous year, amounting to LVL 77 million, mainly because of increased loan loss provisions and losses on the securities portfolio.
Do konca leta 2008 je bil skupni lastniški kapital za 65 % nižji kot prejšnje leto in je znašal 77 milijonov LVL, kar gre večinoma pripisati višjim rezervacijam za izgube pri posojilih in izgubam v portfelju vrednostnih papirjev.
Parex banka sought State assistance in early November 2008.
Banka Parex je za državno pomoč zaprosila v začetku novembra 2008.
Following its nationalisation, Latvia decided to implement rescue measures that provisionally stabilised Parex banka.
Latvija se je po njenem podržavljenju odločila izvesti reševalne ukrepe, s katerimi se je položaj banke Parex začasno stabiliziral.
The plan covered a period from 2009 to 2013.
Načrt je zajemal obdobje 2009–2013.
Corporate, retail and wealth management business [11] were deemed to be the future core segments of Parex banka.
Poslovanje z gospodarskimi družbami, poslovanje s prebivalstvom in dejavnost upravljanja premoženja [11] naj bi bili prihodnji glavni segmenti banke Parex.
On 4 September 2009, Latvia submitted a revised restructuring plan which was subsequently amended on 22 September 2009.
Latvija je 4. septembra 2009 predložila spremenjen načrt prestrukturiranja, ki je bil dopolnjen 22. septembra 2009.
This plan was aimed at addressing doubts raised by the Commission in the opening Decision.
Namen tega načrta je bil odpraviti dvome, ki jih je Komisija izrazila v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
The new bank, Citadele banka, was registered on 30 June 2010 and most of the assets were transferred on 1 August 2010 [13].
Nova banka, banka Citadele, je bila registrirana 30. junija 2010, večina sredstev pa je bila prenesena 1. avgusta 2010 [13].
In principle, the full operational separation of Citadele banka and Parex banka should be completed within 12 months after the transfer.
Načeloma naj bi bila popolna ločitev poslovanja bank Citadele in Parex dokončana v 12 mesecih po prenosu.
Administrative costs of Parex banka have already been decreased by 39 % or LVL 32 million per 2009.
Stroški poslovanja banke Parex so se že znižali za 39 % ali 32 milijonov LVL v primerjavi z letom 2009.
Citadele banka’s cost/income ratio is expected to decrease even further, and stand at [between 35 and 55] % in 2014.
Razmerje med stroški in prihodki banke Citadele naj bi se po pričakovanjih še dodatno znižalo in naj bi leta 2014 znašalo [med 35 in 55] %.
According to the projections included in the final restructuring plan, in the base case Citadele banka would expect to return to profitability already in 2011 and to continuously improve its results until 2015.
Glede na napovedi, vključene v načrt prestrukturiranja, banka Citadele po osnovnem scenariju pričakuje ponovno vzpostavitev dobičkonosnosti že v letu 2011 in stalno izboljševanje rezultatov do leta 2015.
In 2014 Citadele banka would achieve a ROE of [between 18 and 28] %.
V letu 2014 naj bi banka Citadele dosegla [med 18 in 28]-odstotno donosnost lastniškega kapitala.
Further, Table 3 illustrates the main financial performance indicators of Citadele banka for the years 2010-2014.
V preglednici 3 so prikazani glavni kazalniki finančne uspešnosti banke Citadele za obdobje 2010–2014.
The effects of the restructuring actions carried out by the bank’s management are visible in the 2014 key ratios with a cost/income ratio of [between 35 and 55] % and a ROE of [between 18 and 28] %.
Učinki ukrepov prestrukturiranja, ki jih je izvedlo vodstvo banke, so vidni v ključnih kazalnikih za leto 2014, pri čemer razmerje med stroški in prihodki znaša [med 35 in 55] %, donosnost lastniškega kapitala pa [med 18 in 28] %.
In a worst case scenario Citadele banka is expected to return to profitability in 2013 and to improve its results further in 2014.
Po najslabšem možnem scenariju se pričakuje, da bo banka Citadele vnovič donosna leta 2013 in svoje rezultate leta 2014 še izboljšala.
In 2014 the bank would achieve a ROE of [> 0] % [20].
Leta 2014 naj bi banka dosegla [> 0]-odstotno donosnost lastniškega kapitala.
It will sell and run off all of its assets during the 2010-2017 period.
V obdobju 2010–2017 bo odprodala in likvidirala vsa svoja sredstva.
The main task of Parex banka will be to recover the maximum amount from the assets assigned to it over its lifetime, which for forecasting purposes is assumed to be 8 years.
Glavna naloga banke Parex bo povrniti kar največji znesek iz sredstev, dodeljenih med njeno življenjsko dobo, za katero se v napovedi predpostavlja, da naj bi trajala osem let.
Unpaid amounts ranges from LVL [0-100] million (the base case scenario) to LVL [100-200] million (the worst case scenario).
Neplačani zneski znašajo od [0-100] milijonov LVL (osnovni scenarij) do [100-200] milijonov LVL (najslabši možni scenarij).
The repayment can take place earlier in case of a sale of beneficiaries or their assets.
Poplačilo bo lahko hitrejše v primeru prodaje upravičencev ali njihovih sredstev.
Parex banka is envisaged to pay […] % per annum interest on State deposits capitalised after the split until 31 December 2013.
Banka Parex naj bi vsako leto plačala […]-odstotne obresti za depozite države, kapitalizirane po razcepitvi, do 31. decembra 2013.
From 2014 onwards capitalised State deposits will be charged to the profit/loss account at […] %.
Od leta 2014 bodo kapitalizirani depoziti države obračunani kot odhodek v izkazu poslovnega izida v višini […] %.
To carry out the disposal, Latvia shall find a purchaser and enter into a final binding sale and purchase agreement for the sale of Citadele banka by no later than 31 December 2014.
Latvija bo za izvedbo odprodaje poiskala kupca in sklenila dokončno zavezujočo kupoprodajno pogodbo za prodajo banke Citadele najpozneje do 31. decembra 2014.
To carry out this commitment, Latvia must sell all the shares held directly or indirectly (including through public undertakings), in Citadele banka.
Latvija mora za uresničitev te zaveze prodati vse neposredne in posredne deleže (vključno prek javnih podjetij) v banki Citadele.
The main issue raised in the letters of 15 June and 13 July 2010 related to the choice between the ‘good-out’ and ‘bad-out’ scenarios for the bank’s restructuring.
Glavno vprašanje, izpostavljeno v dopisih z dne 15. junija in 13. julija 2010, se je nanašalo na odločanje med „slabim“ in „dobrim“ scenarijem za prestrukturiranje banke.
This would be comparable to the historical ROE of 28 % in 2006 and of 20 % in 2007.
To naj bi bilo primerljivo z 28-odstotno donosnostjo lastniškega kapitala leta 2006 in 20-odstotno donosnostjo leta 2007.
The capital ratios of Citadele banka and those of the group remain well above the minimum regulatory requirements.
Kapitalski deleži banke Citadele in kapitalski deleži skupine še naprej precej presegajo minimalne regulativne zahteve.
ROE
Donosnost lastniškega kapitala
Aug-Dec 2010e 2011e 2012e 2013e 2014e
Stroškovna analiza
Cost analysis Operating expenses/total income
Stroški poslovanja/skupni prihodki
amending Decision 2006/197/EC as regards the renewal of the authorisation to place on the market existing feed produced from genetically modified maize line 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o spremembi Sklepa 2006/197/ES o podaljšanju odobritve dajanja na trg obstoječe krme, proizvedene iz gensko spremenjene koruze sorte 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1), v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Commission Decision 2006/197/EC of 3 March 2006 authorising the placing on the market of food containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize line 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] does not cover the placing on the market of feed produced from maize line 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1) (hereafter ‘maize line 1507’).
Sklep Komisije 2006/197/ES z dne 3. marca 2006 o odobritvi dajanja na trg živil, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjeno koruzo sorte 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1), so iz nje sestavljena ali proizvedena, v skladu z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1829/2003 [2] ne vključuje dajanja na trg krme, proizvedene iz koruze sorte 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: koruza sorte 1507).
Feed produced from maize line 1507 has been placed on the market before the date of application of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and notified in accordance with Article 20(1)(b) of that Regulation.
Krma, proizvedena iz koruze sorte 1507, je bila dana na trg pred dnevom začetka uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 in prijavljena v skladu s členom 20(1)(b) navedene uredbe.
On 12 April 2007 Pioneer Overseas Corporation on behalf of Pioneer Hi-bred International and Dow AgroSciences on behalf of Mycogen Seeds jointly submitted to the Commission an application, in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, for renewal of the authorisation for continued marketing of existing feed produced from maize line 1507.
Podjetji Pioneer Overseas Corporation, ki deluje v imenu podjetja Pioneer Hi-bred International, in Dow AgroSciences, ki deluje v imenu podjetja Mycogen Seeds, sta 12. aprila 2007 v skladu s členom 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 Komisiji skupaj predložili vlogo za podaljšanje odobritve za nadaljnje trženje obstoječe krme, proizvedene iz gensko spremenjene koruze sorte 1507.
On 11 June 2009, the European Food Safety Authority (‘EFSA’) gave a favourable opinion in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and concluded that the new information provided in the application and the review of the scientific literature that has been published since the previous scientific opinions of the EFSA GMO Panel on maize line 1507 [3] do not require changes of the previous scientific opinions on maize line 1507.
(4) Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljevanju: EFSA) je 11. junija 2009 dala ugodno mnenje v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 in ugotovila, da nove informacije iz vloge in pregled znanstvene literature, ki je bila objavljena po prejšnjem znanstvenem mnenju Odbora EFSA za GSO o koruzi sorte 1507 [3], ne zahtevajo sprememb prejšnjih znanstvenih mnenj o koruzi sorte 1507.
Furthermore, EFSA reiterated the previous conclusions that 1507 maize is unlikely to have an adverse effect on human and animal health or the environment in the context of its proposed uses.
Poleg tega je EFSA ponovila prejšnjo ugotovitev, da ni verjetno, da bi koruza sorte 1507 pri predlaganih uporabah imela škodljive učinke na zdravje človeka in živali ali okolje.
This includes the use of feed produced from maize line 1507 [4].
To vključuje uporabo krme, proizvedene iz koruze sorte 1507 [4].
In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Article 18(4) of that Regulation.
EFSA je v svojem mnenju preučila vsa specifična vprašanja in pomisleke držav članic v okviru posvetovanja s pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi, kakor je določeno v členu 18(4) navedene uredbe.
By letter of 21 January 2010, the applicant confirmed that he is aware of the fact that renewing the authorisation of existing feed produced from maize line 1507 by extending the scope of Decision 2006/197/EC so as to include such product, would imply this category of products to be subject to the legal provisions of that Decision.
V pismu z dne 21. januarja 2010 je vlagatelj potrdil seznanjenost z dejstvom, da podaljšanje odobritve za obstoječo krmo, proizvedeno iz koruze sorte 1507, z razširitvijo obsega Sklepa 2006/197/ES, da se vključi takšen proizvod, pomeni, da bo ta skupina proizvodov predmet pravnih določb tega sklepa.
On the basis of the EFSA opinion, no specific labelling requirements other than those provided for in Article 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 appear to be necessary for feed produced from maize line 1507.
Na podlagi mnenja EFSA druge posebne zahteve za označevanje krme, proizvedene iz koruze sorte 1507, razen tistih iz člena 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003, niso potrebne.
The EFSA opinion does not justify the imposition of specific conditions or restrictions for the placing on the market and/or specific conditions or restrictions for the use and handling, including post-market monitoring requirements for the use of the feed, as provided for in point (e) of Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Po mnenju EFSA ni upravičena uvedba posebnih pogojev ali omejitev za dajanje na trg in/ali posebnih pogojev ali omejitev za uporabo in ravnanje, vključno z zahtevami za spremljanje po začetku trženja za uporabo krme, kakor je določeno v členu 18(5)(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
For the sake of transparency, the applicant has been consulted on the measures provided for in this Decision.
Zaradi preglednosti je bil opravljen posvet z vlagateljem o ukrepih iz tega sklepa.
Taking into account these considerations, renewal of the authorisation to place on the market existing feed produced from maize line 1507 should be granted.
Ob upoštevanju teh vidikov je treba dovoliti podaljšanje odobritve dajanja na trg obstoječe krme, proizvedene iz gensko spremenjene koruze sorte 1507.
Since it is general practice to authorise the placing on the market of food and feed in the same decision, the renewal of the authorisation to place on the market feed produced from maize line 1507 should be included in Decision 2006/197/EC.
Ker je splošna praksa, da je odobritev dajanja na trg živil in krme v istem sklepu, je treba podaljšanje odobritve dajanja na trg krme, proizvedene iz koruze sorte 1507, vključiti v Sklep 2006/197/ES.
Decision 2006/197/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Sklep 2006/197/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Since, at its meeting on 17 March 2011, the Council was unable to reach a decision by qualified majority either for or against the proposal and the Council indicated that its proceedings on this file were concluded, these measures are to be adopted by the Commission,
Ker na srečanju 17. marca 2011 Svet ni mogel sprejeti odločitve s kvalificirano večino niti za niti proti predlogu in je sporočil, da so njegovi postopki v zvezi s tem predlogom končani, mora te ukrepe sprejeti Komisija –
Decision 2006/197/EC is amended as follows:
Sklep 2006/197/ES se spremeni:
‘Commission Decision of 3 March 2006 authorising the placing on the market of food containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize line 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1) and renewing the authorisation to place on the market feed produced from such maize, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council’;
„Sklep Komisije z dne 3. marca 2006 o odobritvi dajanja na trg živil, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjeno koruzo sorte 1507 (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1), so iz nje sestavljena ali proizvedena, in o podaljšanju odobritve dajanja na trg krme, proizvedene iz takšne koruze, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta“.
Articles 1, 2 and 3 of Decision 2006/197/EC are replaced by the following:
Členi 1, 2 in 3 Sklepa 2006/197/ES se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
This Decision covers foods and food ingredients containing and consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize (Zea mays L.) line 1507 and feed produced from such maize (the products).
Ta sklep zajema živila in živilske sestavine, ki vsebujejo gensko spremenjeno koruzo sorte 1507 (Zea mays L.), so iz nje sestavljeni ali proizvedeni, ter krmo, proizvedeno iz takšne koruze (proizvodi).
Genetically modified maize (Zea mays L.) line 1507 as further specified in the Annex to this Decision is assigned the unique identifier DAS-Ø15Ø7-1, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 65/2004.
Gensko spremenjeni koruzi sorte 1507 (Zea mays L.), kakor je podrobneje določena v Prilogi k temu sklepu, se dodeli posebni identifikator DAS-Ø15Ø7-1, kot je določen z Uredbo (ES) št. 65/2004.
The placing on the market of the products, according to the conditions specified in this Decision and its Annex, is authorised for the purposes of Articles 4(2) and 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
V skladu s pogoji, določenimi v tem sklepu in Prilogi k Sklepu, je dajanje proizvodov na trg odobreno za namene člena 4(2) in člena 16(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
For the purposes of the specific labelling requirements provided for in Articles 13(1) and 25(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, the “name of the organism” shall be “maize”.’;
Za namen posebnih zahtev za označevanje iz člena 13(1) in člena 25(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 je ‚ime organizma‘‚koruza‘.“