natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On these grounds it was concluded that RHI AG, which supported the imposition of measures at that time, formed part of the Union industry.
Na podlagi tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila družba RHI AG, ki je podpirala uvedbo ukrepov takrat, del industrije Unije.
During the on-spot verification in the course of the current proceeding, it was found that the company’s core business was still situated in the Union.
Med preveritvijo na kraju samem med tem postopkom je bilo ugotovljeno, da glavne dejavnosti družbe še vedno potekajo v Uniji.
The company’s headquarters, shareholders and R & D centre were located in the Union.
Sedež, delničarji in raziskovalno-razvojni center se nahajajo v Uniji.
The company has five plants in the Union producing the product concerned and during the period 2005 to 30 June 2010, the end of the investigation period, the production capacity in these plants increased.
Družba ima v Uniji pet obratov, ki proizvajajo zadevni izdelek, proizvodna zmogljivost pa se je v obdobju od leta 2005 do 30. junija 2010, ko se je obdobje preiskave končalo, povečala.
The figures provided by RHI concerning its production capacity in the Union of the like product and the production volumes per plant in the investigation period were verified and found to be correct.
Podatki, ki jih je zagotovila družba RHI glede proizvodne zmogljivosti v Uniji podobnega izdelka in obsega proizvodnje na obrat, so bili v obdobju preiskave preverjeni in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so resnični.
The company also continued to invest in its EU plants and, for the period 2007 to the end of the investigation period, the investments relating to the like product represented a significant portion of the company’s total investments in the EU.
Družba je prav tako nadaljevala z vlaganjem v svoje obrate EU, v obdobju od leta 2007 do konca obdobja preiskave pa so naložbe glede podobnega izdelka predstavljale znaten del skupnih naložb družbe v EU.
RHI has several related companies in the PRC involved in the production and trading of refractory products including magnesia bricks of which RHI Refractories Liaoning Co. Ltd, a separate legal entity, produces the product concerned.
Družba RHI ima več povezanih družb v LRK, ki so vključene v proizvodnjo in v trgovanje ognjevzdržnih izdelkov, vključno z magnezitno opeko, iz katere družba RHI Refractories Liaoning Co. Ltd, ločen pravni subjekt, proizvaja zadevni izdelek.
Although the plant’s production capacity increased substantially during the period from 2005 to the end of the investigation period, it still does not represent a major proportion of the RHI’s total production capacity (EU and Chinese plants combined).
Čeprav se je proizvodnja zmogljivost obrata močno povečala v obdobju od leta 2005 in do konca obdobja preiskave, še vedno ne predstavlja večjega deleža celotne proizvodne zmogljivosti družbe RHI (združeni obrati EU in kitajski obrati).
With regard to the imports volume of the product concerned, following the imposition of the measures in 2005, the company imported only one small shipment from its related company in the PRC in the investigation period, as it is subject to the highest anti-dumping duty rate of 39,9 %.
Glede obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka je družba po uvedbi ukrepov leta 2005 uvozila le eno majhno pošiljko iz svoje povezane družbe v LRK v obdobju preiskave, ker zanjo velja najvišja stopnja protidampinške dajatve 39,9 %.
RHI provided its sales value and volume for the like product produced in the Union and for the product concerned produced in the PRC.
Družba RHI je zagotovila svojo prodajno vrednost in prodajni obseg za podobni izdelek, proizveden v Uniji, in za zadevni izdelek, proizveden v LRK.
The company demonstrated that the majority of the sales of its related company in the PRC during the investigation period were for export to countries other than the EU, with the remainder being sold on the Chinese market.
Družba je pokazala, da je bila večina prodaje njene povezane družbe v LRK v obdobju preiskave namenjena za izvoz v države razen v EU, preostanek pa je bil prodan na kitajskem trgu.
Concerning the impact the sales of the imported product concerned had on the company’s total Union sales, the volume of these imports compared to the company’s total sales volume in the Union market was insignificant and thus the impact on the company’s sales negligible.
Glede vpliva, ki ga je imela prodaja uvoženega zadevnega izdelka na celotno prodajo družbe v Uniji, je bil obseg tega uvoza v primerjavi s celotnim obsegom prodaje na trgu Unije nepomemben in je bil tako njegov vpliv na prodajo družbe zanemarljiv.
Based on the data verified on-spot it is concluded that RHI should not be excluded from the definition of the Union industry.
Glede na podatke, preverjene na mestu samem, je bilo ugotovljeno, da družba RHI ne sme biti izključena iz opredelitve industrije Unije.
The company’s situation has not changed substantially since the original investigation, when it was found that the three criteria were met and concluded that the company was part of the Union industry.
Položaj družbe se ni znatno spremenil od prvotne preiskave, ko je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bila izpolnjena tri merila in da je družba del industrije Unije.
The findings confirm that the company still has its core business activities (headquarters, R & D centre and main production sites) in the EU.
Ugotovitve so potrdile, da ima družba glavne poslovne dejavnosti (sedež, raziskovalno-razvojni center in glavne proizvodne obrate) še vedno v EU.
The increase in the production capacity of the plant in the PRC in the period 2005 to the end of the investigation period cannot be considered as a shift of the company’s core activities to the PRC.
Povečanje proizvodnje zmogljivosti obrata v LRK v obdobju od leta 2005 do konca obdobja preiskave ni mogoče šteti za premik glavnih dejavnosti družbe v LRK.
Therefore the applicant’s argument that RHI should be excluded on the basis that it has a related company in the PRC producing the product concerned and increasing business activities in the PRC is rejected.
Zato se trditev vložnika, da je treba družbo RHI izključiti zato, ker ima v LRK povezano družbo, ki proizvaja zadevni izdelek in povečuje poslovne dejavnosti v LRK, zavrne.
The information supplied by the applicant did not accurately reflect the situation of RHI as a Union producer, in particular with regard to its production volume and production capacity in the Union, and its production capacity in the PRC.
Informacije, ki jih je predložil vložnik, niso natančno odražale položaja družbe RHI kot proizvajalca Unije, zlasti glede njenega obsega proizvodnje in proizvodne zmogljivosti v Uniji ter njene proizvodne zmogljivosti v LRK.
Thus, by including RHI’s production volume in the total Union production figure the applicant’s output constitutes less than 50 % of the total Union production.
Tako z vključitvijo obsega proizvodnje družbe RHI v podatke o celotni proizvodnji Unije proizvodnja vložnika predstavlja manj kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
Furthermore, as explained above, (i) RHI should be considered as part of the Union industry within the meaning of Article 4 of the basic Regulation; (ii) RHI produces over 50 % of total Union production within the meaning of Article 5(4), second sentence, of the basic Regulation; and (iii) RHI is opposed to the expiry review.
Kot je prej razloženo, (i) je treba družbo RHI šteti za del industrije Unije v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) osnovne uredbe, (ii) družba RHI proizvede več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje Unije v smislu drugega stavka člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe in (iii) družba RHI nasprotuje pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa.
Therefore, the proceeding should be terminated.
Zato je treba postopek zaključiti.
In the light of the above, it is considered that the present proceeding should be terminated in accordance with Article 9 and Article 11(2), (5) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno velja, da je treba trenutni postopek v skladu s členom 9 in členom 11(2), (5) in (6) osnovne uredbe zaključiti.
The applicant was informed accordingly and was given the opportunity to comment.
Vložnik je bil o tem ustrezno obveščen in mu je bila dana možnost, da predloži pripombe.
The applicant strongly contested the conclusions of the Commission and expressed doubts that RHI’s production during the investigation period exceeded the production of the remaining Union producers supporting the complaint.
Vložnik je sklepnim ugotovitvam Komisije močno nasprotoval in izrazil dvom, da je proizvodnja družbe RHI v obdobju preiskave presegla proizvodnjo drugih proizvajalcev Unije, ki podpirajo pritožbo.
In particular the applicant provided various press releases concerning RHI’s activities to substantiate its claims that the company no longer views the production in the Union as its core business and that there is a clear shift in the group’s strategy as it announced massive extensions of its production capacities in the PRC.
Zlasti je vložnik zagotovil različna sporočila za javnost glede dejavnosti družbe RHI za utemeljitev svojih trditev, da družba že dalj časa nima proizvodnje v Uniji za svojo glavno dejavnost in da se je z najavo obsežnih širitev proizvodnih zmogljivosti v LRK strategija skupine spremenila.
However, it was found that such press releases refer to the company’s general overall business activities and do not relate specifically to the product investigated.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da se taka sporočila za javnost nanašajo na splošne skupne poslovne dejavnosti družbe in ne posebej na izdelek v preiskavi.
The applicant did not provide any other evidence of any shift in RHI’s core activities with regard to the period from 2005 to the end of the investigation period that would lead to the conclusion that RHI should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry.
Vložnik ni zagotovil drugih dokazov o spremembi glavnih dejavnosti družbe RHI glede obdobja od leta 2005 do konca obdobja preiskave, zaradi katerih bi bilo mogoče sklepati, da je treba družbo RHI izključiti iz opredelitve industrije Unije.
It is therefore considered that the expiry review proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain magnesia bricks originating in the PRC should be terminated.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba postopek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa glede uvoza v Unijo nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke v LRK zaključiti.
Due to the precise circumstances explained in recital 26 above, the definitive anti-dumping duties paid or entered in the accounts pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China released for free circulation as from 14 October 2010, the date of expiry of the anti-dumping measures, should exceptionally be repaid or remitted.
Glede na zadevne okoliščine, razložene v uvodni izjavi 26, je treba dokončne protidampinške dajatve, plačane ali knjižene v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1659/2005 na uvoz določenih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, sproščene v promet 14. oktobra 2010, na datum izteka protidampinških ukrepov, izjemoma povrniti ali odpustiti.
In the view of the circumstances described above in particular in recital 21, the Commission will monitor the export and import flows of the product concerned as well as the relevant CN Codes.
Glede na okoliščine, razložene zlasti v uvodni izjavi 21, bo Komisija spremljala izvozne in uvozne tokove zadevnega izdelka ter ustrezne oznake KN.
Should the flows appear to change, the Commission will give consideration to the action to be taken.
Če se bodo tokovi spremenili, bo Komisija razmislila o sprejetju ustreznih ukrepov.
TERMINATION OF THE ‘NEW EXPORTER’ REVIEW
ZAKLJUČEK PREGLEDA „NOVEGA IZVOZNIKA“
On 27 May 2010 the Commission received an application for a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 27. maja 2010 prejela zahtevek za pregled „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The application was lodged by TRL China Ltd (‘TRL’), an exporting producer in the PRC.
Zahtevek je vložila družba TRL China Ltd („TRL“), proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK.
TRL claimed that it operated under market economy conditions as defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or alternatively claimed individual treatment in conformity with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Družba TRL je trdila, da je delovala v razmerah tržnega gospodarstva, kot določa člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, oziroma je zahtevala individualno obravnavo v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
It further claimed that it did not export the product concerned to the Union during the period of investigation on which the anti-dumping measures were based, i.e. the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (‘the original investigation period’) and that it was not related to any of the exporting producers of the product which are subject to the anti-dumping measures mentioned above in recital 1.
Trdila je tudi, da v obdobju preiskave, tj. od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 („obdobje prvotne preiskave“), na katerem so temeljili protidampinški ukrepi, ni izvažala zadevnega izdelka v Unijo in ni povezana z nobenim od proizvajalcev izvoznikov izdelka, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, navedeni v uvodni izjavi 1.
TRL further claimed that it had begun exporting the product concerned to the Union after the end of the original investigation period.
Družba TRL je prav tako trdila, da je začela izvažati zadevni izdelek v Unijo po koncu obdobja prvotne preiskave.
On 28 September 2010 the Commission, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, announced, by Regulation (EU) No 850/2010 [8], the initiation of a ‘new exporter’ review of Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005, the repeal of the duty with regard to imports from TRL and the subjection of these imports to registration.
Komisija je 28. septembra 2010 po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 850/2010 [8] napovedala začetek pregleda Uredbe (ES) št. 1659/2005, odpravo dajatve na uvoz iz TRL in uvedbo registracije takega uvoza.
The investigation period for the ‘new exporter’ review was from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2010.
Obdobje preiskave za pregled „novega izvoznika“ je bilo od 1. julija 2009 do 30. junija 2010.
In view of the termination of the expiry review and given the fact that TRL did not import the product concerned between the date of the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 850/2010 and the date of expiry of the anti-dumping measures (13 October 2010), it is considered that the ‘new exporter’ review concerning imports into the Union of certain magnesia bricks originating in the PRC should therefore also be terminated.
Glede na zaključek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in dejstvo, da družba TRL ni uvozila zadevnega izdelka med datumom začetka veljavnosti Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 850/2010 in datumom izteka protidampinških ukrepov 13. oktobra 2010, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba pregled „novega izvoznika“ glede uvoza nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo zato zaključiti.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation,
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku –
The anti-dumping measures concerning imports of chemically bonded, unfired magnesia bricks, whose magnesia component contains at least 80 % MgO, whether or not containing magnesite, originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex68159100 and ex68159900, are hereby repealed and the proceeding concerning these imports is terminated.
Protidampinški ukrepi glede uvoza kemijsko vezane, nežgane magnezitne opeke, ki vsebuje vsaj 80 % MgO, ki vsebuje magnezit ali ne, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščene v oznaki KN ex68159100 in ex68159900 se razveljavijo, postopek v zvezi s tem uvozom pa se zaključi.
The definitive anti-dumping duties paid or entered in the accounts pursuant to Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China released for free circulation as from 14 October 2010 shall be repaid or remitted.
Dokončne protidampinške dajatve, plačane ali knjižene v skladu s členom 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1659/2005 na uvoz nekaterih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, sproščene v promet s 14. oktobrom 2010, se povrnejo ali odpustijo.
The ‘new exporter’ review initiated by Regulation (EU) No 850/2010 is hereby terminated.
Pregled „novega izvoznika“, ki se je začel z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 850/2010, se zaključi.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports carried out pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 850/2010.
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza, ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 850/2010.
OJ L 240, 11.9.2009, p. 1.
UL L 240, 11.9.2009, str. 1.
OJ L 240, 11.9.2009, p. 7.
UL L 240, 11.9.2009, str. 7.
OJ C 111, 30.4.2010, p. 29.
UL C 111, 30.4.2010, str. 29.
OJ C 272, 8.10.2010, p. 5.
UL C 272, 8.10.2010, str. 5.
OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 42.
UL L 253, 28.9.2010, str. 42.
Following initiation, RHI claimed that the facts presented by the applicant in the request for review, especially in regard to RHI’s production volume, were not accurate and that, on the contrary, RHI should be included in the definition of the Union industry as had been done in the original proceeding in 2005.
Po začetku je družba RHI trdila, da dejstva, ki jih je predstavil vložnik v zahtevku za pregled, zlasti glede obsega proizvodnje družbe RHI, niso bila natančna in da je nasprotno treba družbo RHI vključiti v opredelitev industrije Unije, kot je bilo storjeno v prvotnem postopku leta 2005.
It consequently disputed the definition of the Union industry which had led to the initiation of the proceeding on the grounds that the requirements of Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation were not met, since it is the largest Union producer, accounting for more than 50 % of total Union production, and is opposed to the initiation.
Posledično je nasprotovala opredelitvi industrije Unije, ki je privedla do začetka postopka z utemeljitvijo, da niso bile izpolnjene zahteve iz člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe, saj je družba največji proizvajalec Unije, ki predstavlja več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje Unije ter prav tako nasprotuje začetku.
This company is a joint venture with a Chinese company and started production in 1997.
Ta družba je skupna družba s kitajsko družbo in je začela s proizvodnjo leta 1997.
It has only one plant.
Ima le en obrat.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 617/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 617/2011
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009 of 30 November 2009 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products [1], and in particular Article 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1216/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o trgovinskih režimih za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov [1], in zlasti člena 18 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff [2], and in particular Article 9(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 z dne 23. julija 1987 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi [2] in zlasti člena 9(1)(a) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2008 [3] lays down the methods of analysis and other technical provisions necessary for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 514/2011 of 25 May 2011 laying down the detailed rules for implementing the preferential trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products, as provided for in Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009 [4].
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 900/2008 [3] določa analizne metode in druge tehnične določbe, potrebne za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1216/2009 in Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 514/2011 z dne 25. maja 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje preferencialnih trgovinskih režimov, ki se uporabljajo za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov, kakor je določeno v členu 7(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1216/2009 [4].
Those methods and provisions apply to imports of certain processed agricultural products in order to determine their reduced agricultural components and to classify those products in the Combined Nomenclature.
Navedene metode in določbe se uporabljajo za uvoz nekaterih predelanih kmetijskih proizvodov, da se določijo njihove znižane kmetijske komponente ter da se navedeni proizvodi uvrstijo v kombinirano nomenklaturo.
In the interest of clarity, it is necessary to update the scope of Regulation (EC) No 900/2008 and to adapt it to the measures laid down in that Regulation.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba posodobiti področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 900/2008 ter jo prilagoditi ukrepom iz navedene uredbe.
In order to ensure consistent application of Regulation (EC) No 900/2008, it is necessary to provide that the formulas, procedures and methods laid down therein for the purpose of applying Annexes II and III to Regulation (EU) No 514/2011 are also to be used for the determination of milk fat content, milk protein content, starch/glucose content and sucrose/invert sugar/isoglucose content for the purpose of selecting the appropriate agricultural element, additional duties for sugar and additional duties for flour in the case of non-preferential imports as provided for in Part Two and in Part Three, Section I, Annex 1, of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.
Za zagotovitev dosledne uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 900/2008 je treba določiti, da se formule, postopki in metode, ki jih ta uredba določa za izvajanje prilog II in III k Uredbi (EU) št. 514/2011, uporabljajo tudi za določanje vsebnosti mlečne maščobe, vsebnosti mlečnih beljakovin, vsebnosti škroba/glukoze in vsebnosti saharoze/invertnega sladkorja/izoglukoze za izbor ustreznega kmetijskega dela, dodatnih dajatev za sladkor in dodatnih dajatev za moko v primeru nepreferencialnega uvoza, kakor je določeno v Prilogi 1 oddelka I drugega in tretjega dela Priloge I k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2658/87.
In order to ensure effective application of Regulation (EC) No 900/2008, it is necessary to provide that the methods and procedures laid down therein for classifying certain goods falling within certain CN codes for the purposes of applying Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 514/2011 should also be used for classifying those goods in the case of non-preferential imports as provided for in Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.
Za zagotovitev učinkovite uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 900/2008 je treba določiti, da se metode in postopki, ki jih ta uredba določa za uvrščanje nekaterega blaga v nekatere oznake KN za namene uporabe Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 514/2011, uporabljajo tudi za uvrščanje navedenega blaga v primeru nepreferencialnega uvoza, kot je določeno v Prilogi I k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2658/87.
In order to take account of amendments to the Combined Nomenclature, it is necessary to adapt certain references to CN codes.
Zaradi upoštevanja sprememb kombinirane nomenklature je treba prilagoditi nekatere sklice na oznake KN.
Regulation (EC) No 900/2008 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 900/2008 se spremeni:
This Regulation lays down the following:
Področje uporabe Ta uredba določa:
the methodology and methods of analysis to be used for determining the content of the agricultural products within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009 or their specific components considered to have been incorporated in imported goods within the meaning of Article 2(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1216/2009;
metodologijo in analizne metode, ki jih je treba uporabiti za določanje vsebnosti kmetijskih proizvodov v smislu člena 2(1)(a) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1216/2009 ali njihovih posebnih komponent, za katere se šteje, da so sestavni del uvoženega blaga, v smislu člena 2(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1216/2009;