natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus, given that the measure at issue is to be considered unlawful and incompatible aid, it must be recovered in order to re-establish the situation that existed on the market before it was granted.
Ker je treba obravnavan ukrep šteti za nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč, ga je treba povrniti, da se ponovno vzpostavi stanje na trgu pred njegovo dodelitvijo.
The amount to be recovered is, therefore, to be calculated from the date when the advantage accrued to the beneficiary, i.e. when the aid was made available to the beneficiary, and is to bear recovery interest until effective recovery.
Znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati, se zato mora izračuna od dne, ko je upravičenka dobila prednost, tj. ko je bila upravičenki na voljo, pri čemer mora plačevati obresti, dokler ne izvede vračila.
In this case, the measure is to be regarded as a sequence of actions by the State.
V tem primeru je treba ukrep obravnavati kot zaporedje dejanj države.
With the extension agreement, MOL was shielded from future increases in the statutory mining fee.
Na podlagi pogodbe o podaljšanju se za družbo MOL prihodnja povišanja zakonsko določene rudarske pristojbine niso uporabljala.
As explained in recitals 61 — 65, the applicable system of reference is that of other market participants operating under the authorisation regime.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 61–65, se kot referenčni sistem uporablja sistem drugih udeležencev na trgu, ki so upravljali polja v okviru režima podelitev.
Therefore, the advantage is the difference between the actual mining fee MOL paid after the amendment of the Mining Act for its operating fields under authorisation and the fees as stipulated in the Mining Act.
Zato je prednost razlika med dejansko rudarsko pristojbino, ki jo je družba MOL plačevala po spremembi Zakona o rudarstvu za svoja polja v skladu s podelitvijo, in pristojbinami, kot so določene v Zakonu o rudarstvu.
As already described in recital 85 above, the Commission considers that the other payment components in the agreement (the extension fee and the one-off payment) were paid in exchange for the extension and not for the right to have fees lower than those applicable to its competitors.
Kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 85 zgoraj, Komisija meni, da so bili drugi elementi plačila iz pogodbe (tj. pristojbina za podaljšanje in enkratno plačilo) plačani v zamenjavo za podaljšanje in ne za pravico do nižjih pristojbin od tistih, ki veljajo za konkurenčne družbe.
This means that they are not to be taken into account in the calculation of the advantage.
To pomeni, da se jih ne sme upoštevati pri izračunu prednosti.
Sum of MOL’s actual and hypothetical mining fee obligation for the relevant period
Znesek obveznosti dejanske in hipotetične rudarske pristojbine v zadevnem obdobju
Mining fee payments
Plačila rudarskih pristojbin
Actual [63](according to the extension agreement) HUF million
Dejanska [63](v skladu s pogodbo o podaljšanju) v milijonih HUF
Hypothetical
Hipotetična
(according to the Mining Act in force) HUF million
(v skladu z veljavnim Zakonom o rudarstvu) v milijonih HUF
Difference HUF million
Razlika v milijonih HUF
The difference, as shown in Table 5, is therefore HUF 28,4 billion in 2008 and HUF 1,9 billion in 2009, i.e. a total of HUF 30,3 billion.
Tako znaša razlika, kot je prikazana v preglednici 5, 28,4 milijarde HUF za leto 2008 in 1,9 milijarde HUF za leto 2009, kar je skupaj 30,3 milijarde HUF.
This is the amount Hungary would have to recover from MOL plus recovery interest.
To je znesek, ki bi ga Madžarska morala izterjati od družbe MOL, vključno z obrestmi.
Recovery would have to apply to the amounts for 2010 as well, for which there are as yet no figures available.
Vrniti bi bilo treba tudi znesek za leto 2010, za katero podatki še niso na voljo.
The difference in magnitude of the forgone mining fee between 2008 and 2009 is due to the fact that, with the second amendment of the Mining Act that entered into force on 23 January 2009 (after the Commission’s decision to open the formal investigation procedure), the legal situation before the 2008 amendment was reinstated, at least partially, for certain fields, i.e. for fields put into operation between 1998 and 2008.
Razlika v višini neplačanega zneska rudarskih pristojbin med letoma 2008 in 2009 je posledica dejstva, da je bil z drugo spremembo Zakona o rudarstvu, ki je začela veljati 23. januarja 2009 (po odločitvi Komisije o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave), pravni položaj pred spremembo iz leta 2008 ponovno vzpostavljen vsaj delno za nekatera polja, tj. polja, ki so začela obratovati med letoma 1998 in 2008.
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the measure in favour of MOL, i.e. the combination of the extension agreement and the 2008 amendment to the Mining Act, constitutes state aid that is incompatible with the internal market within the meaning of 107(1) TFEU.
Na podlagi navedenega Komisija ugotavlja, da pomeni ukrep v korist družbi MOL, tj. kombinacija pogodbe o podaljšanju in spremembe Zakona o rudarstvu iz leta 2008, državno pomoč, ki je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
Given that the measure is to be considered unlawful and incompatible aid, the aid must be recovered from MOL in order to re-establish the situation that existed on the market before it was granted.
Ker je treba ukrep šteti za nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč, ga mora družba MOL povrniti, da se ponovno vzpostavi stanje na trgu pred njegovo dodelitvijo.
The combination of the fixed mining fee defined in the extension agreement concluded between the Hungarian State and MOL Nyrt. on 22 December 2005 and the subsequent amendments to Act XLVIII of 1993 on Mining constitutes state aid to MOL Nyrt. within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Kombinacija fiksne rudarske pristojbine iz pogodbe o podaljšanju, sklenjene 22. decembra 2005 med Republiko Madžarsko in družbo MOL Nyrt., ter poznejših sprememb Zakona št. XLVIII iz leta 1993 o rudarstvu pomeni državno pomoč družbi MOL Nyrt. v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
The state aid referred to in Article 1(1), unlawfully granted by Hungary to MOL Nyrt., in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU, is incompatible with the internal market.
Državna pomoč iz člena 1(1), ki jo je Madžarska nezakonito dodelila družbi MOL Nyrt. v nasprotju s členom 108(3) PDEU, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
Hungary shall refrain from granting the state aid referred to in paragraph 1 within 2 months following the date of notification of the present Decision.
Madžarska se vzdrži dodeljevanja državne pomoči iz odstavka 1 dva meseca od datuma priglasitve tega sklepa.
Hungary shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1 from the beneficiary.
Upravičenka Madžarski povrne pomoč iz člena 1.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date on which they are actually recovered.
Znesek, ki ga je treba povrniti, vključuje obresti od datuma, ko je bila pomoč upravičencu na voljo, do datuma dejanskega povračila.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 271/2008.
Obresti se izračunajo na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 271/2008.
Hungary shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within 4 months of its notification.
Madžarska zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih od datuma njegove priglasitve.
Within 2 months following notification of this Decision, Hungary shall submit the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih od priglasitve tega sklepa predloži Madžarska Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the total amount (principal and recovery interest) to be recovered from the beneficiary, including the calculation of the aid amount for 2010;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora upravičenka vrniti, vključno z izračunom zneska pomoči za leto 2010;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s tem sklepom;
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
listine, ki dokazujejo, da se je od upravičenke zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
Hungary shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Madžarska obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se vračanje pomoči iz člena 1 ne konča.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Madžarska na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži vse informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Zagotovi tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za povračilo pomoči, ki jih je upravičenka že povrnila.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty became Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; the two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical.
Člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES sta s 1. decembrom 2009 postala člena 107 in 108 PDEU; oba sklopa določb sta vsebinsko enaka.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty as appropriate.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanja na člena 107 in 108 PDEU razumeti kot sklicevanja na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
Commission Decision 2009/C 74/05 (OJ C 74, 28.3.2009, p. 63).
Odločba Komisije 2009/C 74/05 (UL L 74, 28.3.2009, str. 63).
For example, TVK (one of Hungary’s leading chemical companies), Slovnaft (a Slovak oil company) and Roth (an Austrian retail and wholesale company).
Na primer, družbe TVK (ena od vodilnih kemičnih družb na Madžarskem), Slovnaft (slovaška naftna družba) in Roth (avstrijska družba za prodajo na drobno in debelo).
The Group also has a strategic partnership with the Croatian company INA.
Skupina je v strateškem partnerstvu s hrvaško družbo INA.
Törvény a bányászatról (Act No XLVIII of 1993 on Mining).
Törvény a bányászatról (Zakon o rudarstvu št. XLVIII iz leta 1993).
Section 8 of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 8 Zakona.
Section 5 of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 5 Zakona.
Section 12 of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 12 Zakona.
Section 10 of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 10 Zakona.
Section 5(1)(a) of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 5(1)(a) Zakona.
Section 5(4) of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 5(4) Zakona.
Section 9 of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 9 Zakona.
Section 20(1) of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 20(1) Zakona.
Section 20(11) of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 20(11) Zakona.
Section 20(2)-(7) of the Mining Act.
Oddelek 20(2)–(7) Zakona.
Other fees were stipulated for other types of minerals, such as solid minerals.
Za druge vrste rudnin, kot so trdni minerali, so bile določene druge pristojbine.
Section 26/A(5) of the Mining Act reads as follows: ‘the mining company shall start production […] within 5 years of the mining field being established.
Oddelek 26/A(5) Zakona o rudarstvu določa: „rudarska družba mora začeti s proizvodnjo […] v petih letih od vzpostavitve rudnega polja. Rudarska družba lahko pri organu za rudarstvo vloži prošnjo za enkratno podaljšanje roka do pet let. Rudarska družba plača takso, če se podaljšanje odobri.
The mining company may ask the Mining Authority to extend this deadline by up to 5 years once only.
Količina mineralnih surovin, ki ustreza znesku takse in deležu rudarske pristojbine, ki ju je treba plačati glede na vrednost, se določi s pogodbo, sklenjeno med ministrom in rudarsko družbo po višji stopnji, kot je delež, ki je veljal v času uporabe, vendar ne več kot po 1,2-kratni prvotni stopnji.
The Mining Authority shall decide on the extension of the deadline.
Odločitev navaja znesek obveznosti plačila, določenega v pogodbi.
If a request is made to extend the deadline for more than five mining fields, in addition to the mining fee increased in accordance with the agreement concluded between the minister and the mining company, a further single payment may also be established corresponding to 20 % of the amount payable in accordance with the increased mining fee’.
Če se vloži zahtevek za podaljšanje roka več kot petim rudnim poljem, se lahko poleg rudarske pristojbine, zvišane v skladu s pogodbo med ministrom in rudarsko družbo, uvede enotno plačilo, ki ustreza 20 % zneska, plačanega v skladu z višjo rudarsko pristojbino.“
Maximum 20 % of the amount based on the increased mining fee.
Največ 20 % zneska, ki temelji na višji rudarski pristojbini.
Point 1 of the extension agreement.
Točka 1 pogodbe o podaljšanju.
Point 3 of the extension agreement.
Točka 3 pogodbe o podaljšanju.
Point 4 of the extension agreement.
Točka 4 pogodbe o podaljšanju.
Point 9 of the extension agreement stipulates that all factors determining the level of the mining fee remain unchanged for the entire duration of the contract.
Točka 9 pogodbe o podaljšanju določa, da vsi faktorji, ki določajo stopnjo rudarske pristojbine, ostanejo enaki za celotno obdobje veljavnosti pogodbe.
Approximately EUR 76 million at the ECB exchange rate of EUR/HUF 263 on 16 April 2010. In this Decision all EUR/HUF conversions have been done at this rate.
Točka 6 pogodbe o podaljšanju.
Point 6 of the extension agreement.
Približno 76 milijonov EUR po menjalnem tečaju ECB EUR/HUF z dne 16. aprila 2010. Po tem sklepu je treba vse preračune opraviti po tej stopnji.
Act No CXXIII of 2007.
Zakon št. CXXIII iz leta 2007.
Section 235 of Act No LXXXI of 2008.
Oddelek 235 Zakona št. LXXXI iz leta 2008.
Section 26/A(5) of the Mining Act: ‘[…] at a higher rate than the percentage applied at the time of the application but at no more than 1,2 times the original level.’.
Oddelek 26/A(5): „[…] po višji stopnji, kot je delež, ki je veljal v času uporabe, vendar ne več kot po 1,2-kratni prvotni stopnji“.
Case T-196/04 Ryanair Ltd v Commission [2008] ECR II-3643.
Zadeva T-196/04, Ryanair Ltd proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2008, str. II-3643.
One-off payment: see recital 14(d).
Enkratno plačilo: glej uvodno izjavo (14)(d).
Extension fee: see recital 14(a).
Pristojbina za podaljšanje: glej uvodno izjavo (14)(a).
Increased mining fee for all fields: see recital 14(b).
Višja rudarska pristojbina za vsa polja: glej uvodno izjavo (14)(b).
Data covered by professional secrecy have been replaced in the text of the Decision by […].
Podatki, uvrščeni med poslovne skrivnosti, so v besedilu sklepa nadomeščeni z […].
http://www.mabsz.hu/webset32.cgi?Magyar_Baanyaaszati_Szoevetseeg@@HU@@4@@364124456
Http://www.mabsz.hu/webset32.cgi?Magyar_Baanyaaszati_Szoevetseeg@@HU@@4@@364124456.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-88/03, Portugal v Commission [2006] ECR I-7115, paragraph 54.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi C-88/03, Portugalska proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2006, str. I-7115, točka 54.
See, for instance, judgments of the Court of Justice in Case C-56/93, Belgium v Commission [1996] ECR I-723, paragraph 79; Case C-241/94, France v Commission, [1996] ECR I-4551, paragraph 20; Case C- 75/97, Belgium v Commission, [1999] ECR I-3671, paragraph 25; and Case C-409/00, Spain v Commission, [2003] ECR I-10901, paragraph 46.
Glej na primer sodbe Sodišča v zadevah C-56/93, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1996, str. I-723, točka 79; C-241/94, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1996, str. I-4551, točka 20; C-75/75, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str. I-3671, točka 25 in C-409/00, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str. I-10901, točka 46.
See Cases T-211/04 and T-215/04 Government of Gibraltar v Commission [2008] ECR II-3745 stating that ‘in order to determine whether the measure at issue is selective it is appropriate to examine whether, within the context of a particular legal regime, that measure constitutes an advantage for certain undertakings in comparison with others which are in a comparable legal and factual situation.
Glej zadevi T-211/04 in T-215/04, Vlada Gibraltarja proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2008, str. II-3745, ki navajata, „naj se ugotovi, ali je nacionalni ukrep v okviru posamezne pravne ureditve tak, da daje prednost posameznim podjetjem […] v primerjavi z drugimi podjetji […] v primerljivem dejanskem in pravnem položaju.
The determination of the reference framework has a particular importance in the case of tax measures, since the very existence of an advantage may be established only when compared with “normal” taxation ’.
Določitev referenčnega okvira ima poseben pomen pri davčnih ukrepih, ker je sam obstoj prednosti mogoče dokazati le, če se primerja s tako imenovano ‚običajno‘ obdavčitvijo. “
Cases T-92/00 and T-103/00 Ramondín [2002] ECR II-1385, points 32-35.
Zadevi T-92/00 in T-103/00, Ramondin, Recueil 2002, str. II-1385, točke 32–35.
Hungary compares the authorisation of mining activities with rental fees requested for communal housing, in a case in which the State can also act as a private operator.
Madžarska primerja dovoljenja za rudarske dejavnosti z najemninami socialnih stanovanj, pri čemer ima lahko država vlogo zasebne upravljavke.
This comparison, however, is not accurate, because authorisation of mining activity, contrary to the leasing of housing, cannot be originally exercised by a private actor.
Ta primerjava vseeno ni pravilna, ker dovoljenja za rudarsko dejavnost v nasprotju za najemnino stanovanja prvotno ne more uporabljati zasebni akter.
In this respect, the activity of granting administrative mining authorisations is more akin to other administrative authorisations typically granted by public authorities, such as for example authorisations for use of public domain.
V zvezi s tem je dejavnost podelitve upravnih dovoljenj za rudarjenje bolj podobno upravnim dovoljenjem, ki jih običajno podeljujejo javni organi, kot so dovoljenja za uporabo javne domene.
This reality is recognised in Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons (OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p. 3) which, for instance, considers that ‘Member States have sovereignty and sovereign rights over hydrocarbon resources on their territories’.
Dejansko stanje se priznava na podlagi Direktive 94/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 1994 o pogojih za izdajo in uporabo dovoljenj za iskanje, raziskovanje in izkoriščanje ogljikovodikov (UL L 164, 30.6.1994, str. 3), ki na primer navaja, da „so države članice suverene in imajo suverene pravice do ogljikovodikovih virov na svojem ozemlju“.
In Hungary, Section 3 of the Mining Act states that ‘Mineral raw materials and geothermal energy in the locations in which they naturally occur are state-owned.
Oddelek 3 madžarskega Zakona o rudarstvu navaja, da „so mineralne surovine in geotermalna energija na krajih, kjer se pojavljajo v naravi, v državni lasti.
By the act of production the mining undertaking shall become the owner of the mineral raw materials extracted and the geothermal energy obtained for energy purposes’.
Z zakonom o izkoriščanju rudarsko podjetje postane lastnik načrpanih mineralnih surovin in geotermalne energije, pridobljenih za energetske namene.“
Case T-156/2004 EDF v Commission, not published yet in the ECR, paragraph 233.
Zadeva T-156/2004, EDF proti Komisiji, še ni objavljena v ZOdl., točka 233.
Five out of the twelve mining fields granted exemption put into operation after 1 January 2008.
Pet od 12 rudnih polj, za katera je bilo odobreno izvzetje, je začelo obratovati po 1. januarju 2008.
For reasons of simplification the mining fee applicable from the 5th year is indicated.Note: In the columns referring to the 2008 and 2009 amendments, the white fields refer to the categories of mining fields where in effect MOL paid more under the extension agreement than under the Mining Act.
Zaradi poenostavitve je navedena rudarska pristojbina, ki je začela veljati po petem letu.Opomba: v stolpcih, ki se nanašajo na spremembi iz leta 2008 in 2009, bela polja označujejo kategorije rudnih polj, za katera je družba MOL v skladu s pogodbo o podaljšanju dejansko plačevala več, kot bi plačevala v skladu z Zakonom o rudarstvu.
The fields shaded in dark grey represent the types of fields where MOL pays less under the agreement in any case, regardless of the crude oil price.
Polja temno sive barve označujejo vrste polj, za katera družba MOL v skladu s pogodbo v vsakem primeru plačuje manj, ne glede na ceno surove nafte.
The fields shaded in light grey represent the types of fields where MOL may pay less under the agreement, depending on the crude oil price.
Polja svetlo sive barve označujejo vrste polj, za katera lahko glede na ceno surove nafte družba MOL v skladu s pogodbo plačuje manj.
The factor ‘J’ is to be calculated according to a formula based on historical gas prices, extracted quantity and value.
Faktor „J“ se izračuna po formuli, ki temelji na cenah plina v preteklosti, načrpanih količinah in vrednosti.
‘c’ is the multiplier stipulated in the extension agreement, ranging between 1,020 and 1,050; see Table 1.
„c“ je množitelj, ki je določen v pogodbi o podaljšanju ter znaša med 1,020 in 1,050; glej preglednico 1.
In 2008 the Nyírség-Dél gas field (operated by the company GEOMEGA until September 2008 and subsequently by the company PetroHungaria) was subject to an average annual mining fee of 14,24 %-18 %.
Leta 2008 je za plinsko polje Nyírség-Dél (ki ga je do septembra 2008 upravljala družba GEOMEGA in potem družba PetroHungaria) veljala povprečna letna rudarska pristojbina v višini 14,24 %–18 %.
The Hernád gas field (operated by the company HHE North) was subject to an average annual mining fee of 14,95 % in 2008.
Za plinsko polje Hernád (ki ga je upravljala družba HHE North) je leta 2008 veljala povprečna letna rudarska pristojbina v višini 14,95 %.
In terms of volume (i.e. m3 of output), 99,8 % of MOL oil fields and 97,6 % of MOL gas fields were subject to the extension agreement in 2008.
V zvezi s količino (tj. m3 načrpanega plina/nafte) je za 99,8 % naftnih polj in 97,6 % plinskih polj družbe MOL veljala pogodba o podaljšanju iz leta 2008.
Joined Cases T-427/04 and T-17/05 France v Commission and France Telecom v Commission, not yet published, point 207.
Združeni zadevi T-427/04 in T-17/05, Francija proti Komisiji in France Telecom proti Komisiji, točka 207, še ni objavljeno.
OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13.
Objavljene v UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13.
Point 5 of the Regional Aid Guidelines.
Točka 5 smernic o regionalni pomoči.
Section 5 of Regional Aid Guidelines allows operating aid under strict conditions.
V skladu z oddelkom 5 smernic o regionalni pomoči je pomoč za tekoče poslovanje dovoljena pod strogimi pogoji.
Moreover, the measure is ad hoc aid.
Poleg tega je ukrep ad hoc pomoč.
Case C-5/89 Commission v Germany [1990] ECR I-3437, point 14.
Zadeva C-5/89, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1990, str. I-3437, točka 14.
Case C-24/95 Alcan Deutschland [1997] ECR I-1591, point 43.
Zadeva C-24/95, Alcan Deutschland, Recueil 1997, str. I-1591, točka 43.
Case C-182/03 and C-217/03 Belgium and Forum 187 ASBL v Commission [2006] ECR I-5479, point 147.
Zadevi C-182/03 in C-217/03, Belgija in Forum 187 ASBL proti Komisiji, ZOdl. 2006, str. I-5479, točka 147.
Case C-17/03 Vereniging voor Energie, Milieu en Water [2005] ECR I-4983, point 81.
Zadeva C-17/03, Vereniging voor Energie, Milieu en Water, ZOdl. 2005, str. I-4983, točka 81.
Case 70/72, Commission v Germany, [1973] ECR 813, paragraph 13.
Zadeva C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1973, str. 00813, točka 13.
Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, point 75.
Združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str. I-4103, točka 75.
Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission [1999] ECR I-030671 points 64-65.
Zadeva C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str. I-030671, točki 64 in 65.