natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Number of premises where VOC contents was checked
Število objektov, kjer je bil opravljen pregled vsebnosti HOS
Number of premises where labels were checked
Število objektov, kjer je bil opravljen pregled označevanja
Table B
Razpredelnica B
For the premises inspected for the VOC content (information given in line 1 and 2 of Table A), please complete Table B.
Za objekte, kjer je bil opravljen pregled vsebnosti HOS (podatki iz 1. in 2. vrstice razpredelnice A), izpolnite razpredelnico B.
Number of product samples analysed using methods specified in 2.8.A or 2.8.B of this Annex
Število vzorcev proizvodov, analiziranih s pomočjo metod iz točke 2.8.A ali 2.8.B te priloge
Number of product samples analysed using method specified in 2.8.C of this Annex where applicable
Število vzorcev proizvodov, analiziranih s pomočjo metode iz točke 2.8.C te priloge, kjer je primerno
Percentage of samples not complying with Phase I VOC limits [4]
Delež v odstotkih vzorcev, neskladnih z mejnimi vrednostmi HOS faze I [4]
Percentage of samples not complying with Phase II VOC limits [4]
Delež v odstotkih vzorcev, neskladnih z mejnimi vrednostmi HOS faze II [4]
Table C
Razpredelnica C
For the premises inspected for the label (information given in line 1 and 3 of Table A), please complete Table C.
Za objekte, kjer je bil opravljen pregled označevanja (podatki iz 1. in 3. vrstice razpredelnice A), izpolnite razpredelnico C.
Number of labels checked by visual inspections using method specified in 2.9.A of this Annex
Število nalepk, pregledanih z vizualnim pregledom s pomočjo metod iz točke 2.9.A te priloge
Number of labels checked using all other methods specified in 2.9.B or 2.9.C of this Annex
Število nalepk, pregledanih s pomočjo katere koli druge metode iz točke 2.9.B ali 2.9.C te priloge
Percentage of labels not complying with labelling requirements
Delež v odstotkih nalepk, ki niso skladne z zahtevami za označevanje
Which categories of products in Annex I to Directive 2004/42/EC in particular were found not to comply with (1) VOC content limits in Annex II; and (2) the product labelling requirements of Article 4 (up to five most recurrent categories)?
Katere kategorije proizvodov iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2004/42/ES so bile še posebej neskladne z (1) mejnimi vrednosti vsebnosti HOS iz Priloge II; in (2) zahtevami za označevanje proizvodov iz člena 4? (navedite do pet najpogostejših kategorij)?
Has use been made of the possibility to grant individual licenses as provided for in Article 3(3) of Directive 2004/42/EC in relation to the restoration and maintenance of buildings and vintage vehicles of particular historical or cultural value?
Je bila uporabljena možnost podelitve posameznih dovoljenj, določenih v členu 3(3) Direktive 2004/42/ES, za namene obnove in vzdrževanja stavb in starinskih vozil s posebno zgodovinsko ali kulturno vrednostjo?
If yes, please briefly describe the operation of the system established to grant individual licences:
Če je bila, na kratko opišite delovanje sistema, oblikovanega za dodelitev posameznih dovoljenj:
Which authorities are in charge of issuing individual licences?
Kateri organi so odgovorni za izdajo posameznih dovoljenj?
sold only in ‘strictly limited’ quantities,
prodajajo le v „strogo omejenih“ količinah,
Quantities of ‘ready to use’ product for which a license has been granted (in weight or volume)
Količine proizvodov „pripravljenih za uporabo“, katerim je bilo dodeljeno dovoljenje (po teži ali prostornini)
What were the main difficulties encountered in setting and implementing the monitoring programme, including problems with implementation of the Directive or administrative problems encountered in implementation of a concrete monitoring programme?
Katere so bile glavne težave pri vzpostavljanju in izvajanju programa spremljanja, vključno s težavami z izvajanjem Direktive ali administrativnimi težavami pri izvajanju konkretnega programa spremljanja?
Please provide any additional relevant comments, suggestions or information in relation with the implementation of Directive 2004/42/EC.
Navedite kakršne koli dodatne ustrezne pripombe, predloge ali podatke v zvezi z izvajanjem Direktive 2004/42/ES.
More than one answer can apply.
Možnih je več odgovorov.
The total number of premises visited or estimated is the sum of lines 1, 2 and 3.
Skupno število ali ocena števila obiskanih objektov je vsota 1., 2., in 3. vrstice.
Set out in part A of Annex II to Directive 2004/42/EC.
Navedene so v delu A Priloge II k Direktivi 2004/42/ES.
For vehicle refinishing products only Phase I applies.
Za proizvode za ličenje vozil se uporablja samo faza I.
How do the competent authorities verify compliance of products with the VOC limit values set out in Annex II to Directive 2004/42/EC [1] More than one answer can apply.
Kako pristojni organi preverijo skladnost proizvodov z mejnimi vrednostmi vsebnosti HOS iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2004/42/ES [1] Možnih je več odgovorov.
What control system has been set up to ensure that products set out in Annex I to Directive 2004/42/EC not complying with the limit values set out in Annex II to Directive 2004/42/EC are not sold to any operator other than installations registered or authorised according to Articles 3 and 4 of Council Directive 1999/13/EC [5]?4.3. If available, please provide an estimate of the quantity of exempted products (according to the classification listed in Annex I to Directive 2004/42/EC) in 2010.
Kakšen sistem nadzora je vzpostavljen za zagotovitev, da se proizvodi iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2004/42/ES, ki niso skladni z mejnimi vrednostmi iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2004/42/ES, ne prodajajo nobenemu izvajalcu, razen obratom, ki so registrirani ali pooblaščeni v skladu s členoma 3 in 4 Direktive Sveta 1999/13/ES [5]?4.3 Če je na voljo, predložite oceno količine oproščenih proizvodov (v skladu z razvrstitvijo v Prilogi I k Direktivi 2004/42/ES) leta 2010.
Council Decision 2010/694/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2010/694/SZVP
of 17 November 2010
z dne 17. novembra 2010
On 27 October 2009, the Council adopted Common Position 2009/787/CFSP concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians [1], which provided for an extension of the validity of their national permits for entry into, and stay in, the territory of the Member States referred to in Common Position 2002/400/CFSP of 21 May 2002 concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians [2] for a further period of 12 months.
Svet je 27. oktobra 2009 sprejel Skupno stališče 2009/787/SZVP o začasnem sprejemu določenih Palestincev s strani držav članic Evropske unije [1], ki je določilo podaljšanje veljavnosti njihovih nacionalnih dovoljenj za vstop in bivanje na ozemlju držav članic iz Skupnega stališča 2002/400/SZVP z dne 21. maja 2002 o začasnem sprejemu nekaterih Palestincev v države članice Evropske unije [2] za nadaljnje obdobje 12 mesecev.
On the basis of an evaluation of the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP, the Council considers it appropriate that the validity of those permits be extended for a further period of 12 months,
Na podlagi ocene uporabe Skupnega stališča 2002/400/SZVP Svet meni, da je primerno podaljšati veljavnost teh dovoljenj za obdobje nadaljnjih 12 mesecev –
The Member States referred to in Article 2 of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP shall extend the validity of the national permits for entry and stay granted pursuant to Article 3 of that Common Position for a further period of 12 months.
Države članice iz člena 2 Skupnega stališča 2002/400/SZVP podaljšajo veljavnost nacionalnih dovoljenj za vstop in bivanje, izdanih na podlagi člena 3 navedenega skupnega stališča, za obdobje nadaljnjih 12 mesecev.
The Council shall evaluate the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP within 6 months of the adoption of this Decision.
Svet oceni uporabo Skupnega stališča 2002/400/SZVP v roku 6 mesecev od sprejetja tega sklepa.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 2010.
V Bruslju, 17. novembra 2010
OJ L 281, 28.10.2009, p. 6.
UL L 281, 28.10.2009, str. 6.
amending the Annexes to Decision 93/52/EEC as regards the recognition of Estonia, Latvia and the Autonomous Community of the Balearic Islands in Spain as officially free of brucellosis (B. melitensis) and amending Annexes I and II to Decision 2003/467/EC as regards the declaration of Estonia as officially tuberculosis-free and officially brucellosis-free as regards bovine herds
o spremembi Prilog k Odločbi 93/52/EGS glede priznanja Estonije, Latvije in avtonomne skupnosti Balearskih otokov v Španiji kot uradno prostih bruceloze (B. melitensis) ter spremembi prilog I in II k Odločbi 2003/467/ES glede razglasitve, da je Estonija uradno prosta tuberkuloze in uradno prosta bruceloze glede čred goveda
(notified under document C(2010) 7856)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 7856)
Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine [1], and in particular Annex A(I)(4) and Annex A(II)(7) thereto,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 64/432/EGS z dne 26. junija 1964 o problemih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki vplivajo na trgovino z govedom in prašiči znotraj Skupnosti [1], ter zlasti Priloge A(I)(4) in Priloge A(II)(7) k Direktivi,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/68/EEC of 28 January 1991 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in ovine and caprine animals [2], and in particular Section II of Chapter 1 of Annex A thereto,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/68/EGS z dne 28. januarja 1991 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo trgovanje znotraj Skupnosti z ovcami in kozami [2], ter zlasti oddelka II poglavja 1 Priloge A k Direktivi,
Directive 91/68/EEC defines the animal health conditions governing trade in the Union in ovine and caprine animals.
Direktiva 91/68/EGS določa pogoje v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo trgovanje znotraj Unije z ovcami in kozami.
It lays down the conditions whereby Member States or regions thereof may be recognised as being officially brucellosis-free.
Določa pogoje, v skladu s katerimi se države članice ali regije priznajo kot uradno proste bruceloze.
Commission Decision 93/52/EEC of 21 December 1992 recording the compliance by certain Member States or regions with the requirements relating to brucellosis (B. melitensis) and according them the status of a Member State or region officially free of the disease [3] lists, in the Annexes thereto, the Member States and regions thereof which are recognised as officially free of brucellosis (B. melitensis) in accordance with Directive 91/68/EEC.
Odločba Komisije 93/52/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1992 o ugotovitvi skladnosti nekaterih držav članic ali regij z zahtevami glede bruceloze (B. melitensis) in o priznanju statusa države članice ali regije, uradno proste te bolezni [3] v prilogah navaja države članice in njihove regije, ki so priznane kot uradno proste bruceloze (B. melitensis) v skladu z Direktivo 91/68/EGS.
Estonia and Latvia have submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions laid down in Directive 91/68/EEC to be recognised as officially free of brucellosis (B. melitensis) for the entire territory of the respective Member State.
Estonija in Latvija sta predložili Komisiji dokumentacijo, ki dokazuje skladnost s pogoji iz Direktive 91/68/EGS, da se celotno ozemlje zadevne države članice prizna kot uradno prosto bruceloze (B. melitensis).
Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Estonia and Latvia, both Member States should be recognised as being officially free of that disease.
Po pregledu dokumentacije, ki sta jo predložili Estonija in Latvija, je treba obe državi članici priznati kot uradno prosti navedene bolezni.
Spain has submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating for the Autonomous Community of the Balearic Islands compliance with the conditions laid down in Directive 91/68/EEC in order for that region in Spain to be recognised as officially free of brucellosis (B. melitensis).
Španija je predložila Komisiji dokumentacijo, ki za avtonomno skupnost Balearskih otokov prikazuje skladnost s pogoji iz Direktive 91/68/EGS, da se ta regija v Španiji prizna kot uradno prosta bruceloze (B. melitensis).
Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Spain, the Autonomous Community of the Balearic Islands should be recognised as being officially free of that disease.
Po pregledu dokumentacije, ki jo je predložila Španija, je treba avtonomno skupnost Balearskih otokov priznati kot uradno prosto navedene bolezni.
Annex II to Decision 93/52/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo II k Odločbi 93/52/EGS je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Directive 64/432/EEC applies to trade within the Union in bovine animals and swine.
Direktiva 64/432/EGS se uporablja za trgovanje z govedom in prašiči znotraj Unije.
It lays down the conditions whereby a Member State may be declared officially tuberculosis-free and officially brucellosis-free as regards bovine herds.
Določa pogoje, v skladu s katerimi se lahko država članica razglasi za uradno prosto tuberkuloze in uradno proste bruceloze glede čred goveda.
Annexes I and II to Commission Decision 2003/467/EC of 23 June 2003 establishing the official tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status of certain Member States and regions of Member States as regards bovine herds [4] list the Member States which are declared respectively officially tuberculosis-free and officially brucellosis-free.
Prilogi I in II k Odločbi Komisije 2003/467/ES z dne 23. junija 2003 o uvedbi statusa nekaterih držav članic in regij držav članic, uradno prostih tuberkuloze, bruceloze in enzootske goveje levkoze glede čred goveda [4] navaja države članice, ki so razglašene za uradno proste tuberkuloze in uradno proste bruceloze.
Estonia has submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially tuberculosis-free and officially brucellosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for the entire territory of that Member State.
Estonija je predložila Komisiji dokumentacijo, ki dokazuje skladnost s pogoji iz Direktive 64/432/EGS, za podelitev statusa državi, uradno prosti tuberkuloze in uradno prosti bruceloze za celotno območje navedene države članice.
Following evaluation of the documentation submitted by Estonia, that Member State should be declared officially tuberculosis-free and officially brucellosis-free.
Po pregledu dokumentacije, ki jo je predložila Estonija, se navedeno državo članico razglasi za uradno prosto tuberkuloze in uradno prosto bruceloze.
Annexes I and II to Decision 2003/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogi I in II k Odločbi 2003/467/EGS je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decisions 93/52/EEC and 2003/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 93/52/EGS in Odločbo 2003/467/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The Annexes to Decision 93/52/EEC are amended in accordance with Annex I to this Decision.
Prilogi k Odločbi 93/52/EGS sta spremenjeni v skladu s Prilogo I k temu sklepu.
Annexes I and II to Decision 2003/467/EC are amended in accordance with Annex II to this Decision.
Prilogi I in II k Odločbi 2003/467/ES sta spremenjeni v skladu s Prilogo II k temu sklepu.
The Annexes to Decision 93/52/EEC are amended as follows:
Priloge k Odločbi 93/52/EGS se spremenita:
Officially brucellosis (B. melitensis) free Member States
Države članice, uradno proste bruceloze (B. melitensis)
ISO code
oznaka ISO
United Kingdom’
Združeno Kraljestvo“
the following title is inserted:
Vstavi se naslednji naslov:
‘Officially brucellosis (B. melitensis) free regions of Member States’;
„Regije držav članic, uradno proste bruceloze (B. melitensis)“
the entry for Spain is replaced by the following:
Vnos za Španijo se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘In Spain:
„V Španiji:
Autonomous Community of the Balearic Islands,
avtonomna skupnost Balearskih otokov,
Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands: Provinces of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Las Palmas.’.
avtonomna skupnost Kanarskih otokov, provinci Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Las Palmas.“
Annexes I and II to Decision 2003/467/EC are amended as follows:
Prilogi I in II k Odločbi 2003/467/ES se spremenita:
In Annex II, Chapter 1 is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi II se Poglavje 1 nadomesti z:
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 286(5) Pogodbe,
Mr Maarten B. ENGWIRDA, member of the Court of Auditors, has resigned with effect from 1 January 2011.
Maarten B. ENGWIRDA, član Računskega sodišča, je odstopil z učinkom od 1. januarja 2011.
Mr Maarten B. ENGWIRDA should therefore be replaced for the remainder of his term of office,
Maarten B. ENGWIRDA bi moral biti nadomeščen za preostanek njegovega mandata –
Mr Gijs M. de VRIES is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013.
Gijs M. de VRIES je imenovan za člana Računskega sodišča za obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2013.
of 22 November 2010
z dne 22. novembra 2010
on the recognition of Sri Lanka as regards education, training and certification of seafarers for the recognition of certificates of competency
o priznavanju Šrilanke glede izobrazbe, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakov v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti
(notified under document C(2010) 7963)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 7963)
Having regard to the letter of 13 May 2005 from the Cypriot authorities, requesting the recognition of Sri Lanka in order to recognise certificates of competency issued by this country,
ob upoštevanju dopisa ciprskih organov z dne 13. maja 2005 z zahtevo po priznavanju Šrilanke v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti, ki jih izda ta država,
Member States may decide to endorse seafarers’ certificates of competency issued by third countries, provided that the relevant third country is recognised by the Commission as ensuring that this country complies with the requirements of the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended (STCW Convention) [2].
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da potrdijo spričevala usposobljenosti pomorščakov, ki jih izdajo tretje države, če Komisija zadevni tretji državi priznava, da zagotavlja upoštevanje zahtev Mednarodne konvencije o standardih za usposabljanje, izdajanje spričeval in ladijsko stražarjenje pomorščakov (konvencija STCW) iz leta 1978, kakor je bila spremenjena [2].
Following the request of the Cypriot authorities, the Commission assessed the maritime education, training and certification systems in Sri Lanka in order to verify whether this country complies with the requirements of the STCW Convention and whether appropriate measures have been taken to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Na podlagi zahteve ciprskih organov je Komisija ocenila sisteme pomorskega izobraževanja, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval v Šrilanki, da bi preverila, ali ta država izpolnjuje zahteve konvencije STCW in ali so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali.
This assessment was based on the results of a fact-finding inspection performed by experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency in November 2006.
Ta ocena je temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcijskega pregleda za ugotavljanje dejstev, ki so ga opravili strokovnjaki Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost v novembru 2006.
Where deficiencies had been identified during the assessment of compliance with the STCW Convention, the Sri Lankan authorities provided to the Commission the requested relevant information and evidence concerning the implementation of appropriate and sufficient corrective action that address most of these issues.
Kjer so bile med ocenjevanjem skladnosti s konvencijo STCW ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti, so šrilanški organi dali Komisiji zahtevane zadevne informacije in dokaze glede izvajanja ustreznih in zadostnih korektivnih ukrepov, ki urejajo večino teh zadev.
Some remaining shortcomings, relating to few aspects of the national procedures concerning education training and certification of seafarers, concern in particular missing specific legal provisions regarding qualifications of instructors, the use of simulators, as well as the lack of design and testing for simulators exercises in one of the maritime education and training institutions that were examined.
Preostale pomanjkljivosti, ki se nanašajo na manj pomembne vidike nacionalnih postopkov glede usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval za pomorščake, zadevajo predvsem pomanjkanje pravnih določb glede kvalifikacij inštruktorjev, uporabe simulatorjev, kot tudi pomanjkanje pri oblikovanju in testiranju vaj s simulatorji v eni izmed pregledanih ustanov za pomorsko izobraževanje in usposabljanje.
The Sri Lankan authorities have therefore been invited to implement further corrective action regarding these matters.
Zato so bili šrilanški organi pozvani, da v zvezi s tem izvedejo nadaljnje korektivne ukrepe.
However, these shortcomings do not warrant calling into question the overall level of compliance of the Sri Lankan systems regarding maritime education, training and certification with the STCW Convention.
Vendar te pomanjkljivosti ne upravičujejo dvomov v splošno raven skladnosti šrilanških sistemov glede pomorskega izobraževanja, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval s konvencijo STCW.
The outcome of the assessment of compliance and the evaluation of the information provided by the Sri Lankan authorities demonstrate that Sri Lanka complies with the relevant requirements of the STCW Convention.
Izid ocenjevanja skladnosti in ocena informacij, ki so jih poslali šrilanški organi, kažeta, da Šrilanka upošteva zadevne zahteve konvencije STCW.
Sri Lanka has also taken appropriate measures to prevent fraud involving certificates and should thus be recognised by the Union.
Šrilanka je sprejela tudi primerne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali, in bi jo Unija zato morala priznati.
Sri Lanka is recognised as regards education, training and certification of seafarers, for the purpose of recognition of certificates of competency issued by this country.
Glede izobrazbe, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakov se Šrilanki priznava v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti, ki jih izda ta država.
Done at Brussels, 22 November 2010.
V Bruslju, 22. novembra 2010
on the withdrawal of the recognition of Georgia as regards education, training and certification of seafarers for the recognition of certificates of competency
o preklicu priznavanja Gruzije glede izobrazbe, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakov v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti
(notified under document C(2010) 7966)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 7966)
Having regard to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the minimum level of training of seafarers [1] and in particular Article 20(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o minimalni ravni izobraževanja pomorščakov [1] in zlasti člena 20(2) Direktive,
Having regard to the reassessment of compliance of Georgia carried out by the Commission pursuant to Article 21(1) of Directive 2008/106/EC,
ob upoštevanju ponovnega ocenjevanja skladnosti Gruzije, ki ga je izvedla Komisija v skladu s členom 21(1) Direktive 2008/106/ES,