natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It referred to the complaint in which the target profit suggested was lower.
Sklicevala se je na pritožbo, v kateri je bil predlagani ciljni dobiček nižji.
The complainant on the other hand requested that the target profit should be set at minimum 10 %, basing its arguments on the expected profit margin used by independent rating agencies in their classification methodology and the profitability achieved by a producer active in another paper production segment that is not affected by Chinese imports.
Pritožnik je po drugi strani zahteval, da bi se ciljni dobiček moral določiti v višini najmanj 10 %, pri čemer je svoje argumente utemeljil na pričakovani stopnji dobička, ki jo neodvisne bonitetne agencije uporabljajo pri svoji metodologiji za klasifikacijo, ter na dobičkonosnosti proizvajalca, dejavnega v drugem segmentu proizvodnje papirja, na katerega ne vpliva kitajski uvoz.
It should be clarified that the target profit as suggested in the complaint was examined based on the questionnaire replies and verification visits to the representative Union producers.
Treba je pojasniti, da je bil v pritožbi predlagani ciljni dobiček proučen na podlagi izpolnjenih vprašalnikov in preveritvenih obiskov pri reprezentativnih proizvajalcih Unije.
More specifically, the cost of investment in machinery was considered.
Natančneje so se upoštevali stroški naložbe v stroje.
The target profit set on this latter basis was found to reflect the high up-front investment needs and risk involved in this capital-intensive industry in the absence of dumped and/or subsidised imports.
Izkazalo se je, da ciljni dobiček, ki je bil določen na podlagi slednjega, izraža potrebne velike vnaprejšnje naložbe ter tveganje, ki je povezano s to kapitalsko intenzivno industrijo v odsotnosti dampinškega in/ali subvencioniranega uvoza.
Therefore a target profit of 8 % is considered as the level that the industry could obtain in the absence of dumped imports.
Zato se cilji dobiček v višini 8 % šteje za raven, ki bi jo industrija lahko dosegla v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza.
As stated in recital (86), to ensure that the dumping and undercutting and underselling calculations follow a coherent approach and for the reasons set out in recitals (68) to (71), the calculation of the injury elimination level has been revised to exclude the export sales of a company within the group of the cooperating Chinese exporting producers.
Da se zagotovi skladen pristop pri izračunu dampinga, nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen ter zaradi razlogov iz uvodnih izjav (68) do (71), se je izračun stopnje odprave škode popravil tako, da se je izključil izvoz družbe iz skupine enega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (86).
In all other aspects recitals (153) to (161) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Pri vseh drugih vidikih se uvodne izjave (153) do (161) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of coated fine paper originating in the PRC at the level of the lower of the dumping and injury margins found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročnostjo in interesom Unije in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz LRK na ravni najnižjih ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
It is noted that an anti-subsidy investigation was carried out in parallel with the anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of coated fine paper originating in the PRC.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila vzporedno s protidampinško preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz LRK izvedena protisubvencijska preiskava.
Since, pursuant to Article 14(1) of the basic Regulation and Article 24(1), second subparagraph of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [8] (‘the basic anti-subsidy Regulation’), no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from export subsidisation, it was considered necessary to determine whether, and to what extent, the subsidy amounts and the dumping margins arise from the same situation.
V skladu s členom 14(1) osnovne uredbe in drugim pododstavkom člena 24(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [8], („osnovna protisubvencijska uredba“) za noben izdelek ne smejo hkrati veljati protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za obravnavanje enih in istih razmer, ki izhajajo iz dampinga ali iz izvoznega subvencioniranja, zato se je zdelo nujno določiti, ali zneski subvencij in stopnje dampinga izhajajo iz istih razmer in v kakem obsegu.
As concerns the subsidy schemes that constituted export subsidies within the meaning of Article 4(4)(a) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive dumping margin established for two Chinese exporting producers are partly due (i.e. 0,05 %) to the existence of countervailable export subsidies.
Kar zadeva subvencijske sheme, ki so pomenile izvozne subvencije v smislu člena 4(4)(a) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe, je delni razlog (tj. 0,05 %) za dokončno stopnjo dampinga, ki je bila določena za dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika, obstoj izvoznih subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
With respect to other subsidy schemes, in view of the use of the lesser duty rule in this case and the amount of subsidisation found in the anti-subsidy investigation carried out in parallel, it was not considered necessary to further examine whether and to what degree the same subsidies are being offset twice when anti-dumping and countervailing duties are simultaneously imposed on the same imported product.
Glede na druge subvencijske sheme se ob uporabi pravila nižje dajatve v tem primeru in zneska subvencioniranja, ki je bil ugotovljen v vzporedno opravljeni protisubvencijski preiskavi, ni zdelo nujno nadalje proučevati, ali in do kakšne meje se iste subvencije kompenzirajo dvakrat, kadar se protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve uvedejo hkrati na isti uvoženi izdelek.
As concerns the country-wide definitive dumping and subsidy levels it is recalled that they were established using the definitive dumping margin and the definitive subsidy margin established for the cooperating Chinese exporting producers with the highest individual duty rates i.e. 63 % for the definitive dumping margin and 16 % for the definitive subsidy margin.
V zvezi z dokončnimi stopnjami dampinga in ravnmi subvencij na ravni države je treba opozoriti, da so bile določene z uporabo dokončne stopnje dampinga in dokončne stopnje subvencije, ki sta bili določeni za sodelujoče družbe z najvišjimi individualnimi stopnjami dajatve, tj. 63 % za dokončno stopnjo dampinga in 16 % za dokončne stopnje subvencije.
It is recalled that the same injury elimination level applies for both the anti-dumping and the anti-subsidy investigations.
Opozoriti je treba, da se v antidampinških in antisubvencijskih preiskavah uporablja ista stopnja odprave škode.
In this respect it is noted that the injury elimination level is lower than the definitive dumping margins but higher than the definitive subsidy margins.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je stopnja odprave škode nižja od dokončne stopnje dampinga, vendar višja od dokončne stopnje subvencije.
It is thus considered appropriate to impose a definitive countervailing duty at the level of the established definitive subsidy margins and then impose a definitive anti-dumping duty up to the relevant injury elimination level.
Zato se zdi primerno uvesti dokončno izravnalno dajatev v višini ugotovljenih dokončnih stopenj subvencije in nato uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev do višine ustrezne stopnje odprave škode.
On the basis of the above, and taking into account the findings set out in Council Regulation (EU) No 452/2011 of 6 May 2011 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of coated fine paper originating in the People's Republic of China [9] and in light of Article 14 paragraph 1 last sentence of the basic Regulation that duty will not be imposed to the extent necessary to comply with the rule laid down in that sentence the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty for the PRC and the rate at which such duties will be imposed are set as follows:
Na podlagi navedenega, ob upoštevanju ugotovitev iz Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 452/2011 z dne 6. maja 2011 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske [9] ter glede na zadnji stavek odstavka 1 člena 14 osnovne uredbe, da se dajatev ne bo uvedla do mere, potrebne za upoštevanje pravila iz navedenega stavka, sta stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve za LRK in stopnja, po kateri se bodo take dajatve uvajale, določeni, kot sledi:
Out of which export subsidy
Pri čemer je izvozna subvencija
Definitive CVD duty rate
Dokončna stopnja izravnalne dajatve
Definitive AD duty rate
Dokončna stopnja protidampinške dajatve
Definitive AD duty rate to be imposed
Dokončna stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki se bo uvedla
Shangdong Chenming Paper Holdings Limited, Shouguang City, Shandong Province, PRC; Shouguang Chenming Art Paper Co., Ltd, Shouguang City, Shandong Province, PRC
Shangdong Chenming Paper Holdings Limited, Shouguang City, Shandong Province, LRK; Shouguang Chenming Art Paper Co., Ltd, Shouguang City, Shandong Province, LRK
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margin found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, and taking into account that no provisional measures were imposed in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the provisional duty imposed.
Glede na višino ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Unije, in ob upoštevanju, da v vzporedni protisubvencijski preiskavi niso bili uvedeni začasni ukrepi, se šteje, da je treba zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, ki je bila uvedena z začasno uredbo, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska uvedene začasne dajatve.
Article 1
V teh okoliščinah je treba dokončno pobrati začasno dajatev na stopnjah iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1042/2010 – SPREJEL NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on coated fine paper, which is paper or paperboard coated on one or both sides (excluding kraft paper or kraft paperboard), in either sheets or rolls, and with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 and brightness of more than 84 (measured according to ISO 2470-1), currently falling within CN codes ex48101320, ex48101380, ex48101420, ex48101480, ex48101910, ex48101990, ex48102210, ex48102290, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910, ex48109930 and ex48109990 (TARIC codes 4810132020, 4810138020, 4810142020, 4810148020, 4810191020, 4810199020, 4810221020, 4810229020, 4810293020, 4810298020, 4810991020, 4810993020 and 4810999020) and originating in the People's Republic of China.
Člen 1 1. Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na premazan fini papir, ki je papir ali karton, premazan z ene ali z obeh strani (razen kraft papir ali kraft karton), v listih ali zvitkih, ter z maso med 70 g/m2 in 400 g/ m2 ter belino nad 84 (izmerjeno v skladu z ISO 2470-1), ki je trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex48101320, ex48101380, ex48101420, ex48101480, ex48101910, ex48101990, ex48102210, ex48102290, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910, ex48109930 in ex48109990 (oznake TARIC 4810132020, 4810138020, 4810142020, 4810148020, 4810191020, 4810199020, 4810221020, 4810229020, 4810293020, 4810298020, 4810991020, 4810993020 in 4810999020) ter je s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The definitive anti-dumping duty does not concern rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev ne zajema zvitkov, primernih za uporabo na strojih za rotacijski tisk.
Rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses are defined as those rolls which, if tested according to the ISO test standard ISO 3783:2006 concerning the determination of resistance to picking – accelerated speed method using the IGT tester (electric model), give a result of less than 30 N/m when measuring in the cross-direction of the paper (CD) and a result of less than 50 N/m when measuring in the machine direction (MD).
Zvitki, primerni za uporabo na strojih za rotacijski tisk, so opredeljeni kot zvitki, katerih rezultat preskusa po preskusnem standardu ISO 3783:2006 za določanje odpornosti proti trganju z metodo pospešene hitrosti ob uporabi preskusne naprave IGT (električni model) je manj kot 30 N/m pri meritvi v prečni smeri papirja ter manj kot 50 N/m pri meritvi v smeri stroja.
The definitive anti-dumping duty does also not concern multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev se tudi ne nanaša na večplastni papir in večplastni karton.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve je naslednja:
With regard to the anti-dumping duty provided for in Article 1(2), 12 % will not be collected for Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. and Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co., 4 % for Shangdong Chenming Paper Holdings Limited and Shouguang Chenming Art Paper Co., Ltd and 12 % for all other companies in so far as the corresponding amount is collected in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 452/2011.
Protidampinška dajatev iz člena 1(2) se ne bo pobrala v višini 12 % pri Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. in Gold Huasheng Paper (Suzhou Industrial Park) Co., 4 % pri Shangdong Chenming Paper Holdings Limited in Shouguang Chenming Art Paper Co., Ltd ter 12 % pri vseh drugih družbah, če se ustrezni znesek pobere v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 452/2011.
In the light of Article 1(2) and 1(3) above, the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Glede na člen 1(2) in (3) je stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke iz odstavka 1, ki jih proizvajajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju, naslednja:
Amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1042/2010 shall be definitively collected at the rate set in Article 1 of that Regulation.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1042/2010, se dokončno poberejo na stopnji začasne dajatve, ki jo uvaja člen 1 navedene uredbe.
OJ L 299, 17.11.2010, p. 7.
UL L 299, 17.11.2010, str. 7.
OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p.1.
UL C 364, 18.12.2000, str. 1.
Judgment of 3 May 2001, joined cases C-76/98 P and C-77/98 P, Ajinomoto, ECR 2001 p. 3233, paragraph 67.
Sodba z dne 3. maja 2001, združeni zadevi C-76/98 P in C-77/98 P, Ajinomoto, Recueil 2001, str. 3233, odstavek 67.
Commission Decision of 31.10.2008 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5283 - SAPPI / M-REAL) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (OJ C 324, 19.12.2008, p. 8.).
Odločba Komisije z dne 31. oktobra 2008 o združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva št. COMP/M.5283 – SAPPI/M-REAL) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 139/2004 (UL C 324, 19.12.2008, str. 8).
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str.1.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti (UL L 253, 11.10.1993, str. 1).
See page 18 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 18 tega uradnega lista.
One of the cooperating Chinese exporting producers claimed that the definitive collection of the provisional duty at the rates set out in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1042/2010 would be contrary to Article 10 paragraph 3 second sentence of the basic Regulation. However, as clarified in this Regulation, and in particular in Article 1 paragraph 2 thereof, the definitive duty imposed by this Regulation is actually higher than the provisional duty which has been imposed.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo dokončno pobiranje začasne dajatve na stopnjah iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1042/2010 v nasprotju z drugim stavkom odstavka 3 člena 10 osnovne uredbe.
In these circumstances the provisional duty at the rates set out in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1042/2010 should be definitively collected, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Vendar kot je pojasnjeno v tej uredbi in zlasti v odstavku 2 člena 1 Uredbe, je dokončna dajatev, uvedena s to uredbo, pravzaprav višja od začasne dajatve, ki je bila uvedena.
The claim was backed by reference to the USA and the Canadian systems and to the Court of Justice of the European Union in G.J. Dokter and Others v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.
Trditev je bila podprta s sklicevanjem na sistema v ZDA in Kanadi ter na sodbo Sodišča Evropske unije v zadevi G. J. Dokter in drugi proti Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 452/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 452/2011
imposing a definitive anti-subsidy duty on imports of coated fine paper originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protisubvencijske dajatve na uvoz premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), zlasti člena 15(1) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the European Commission (‘the Commission’) after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom predložila Evropska komisija („Komisija“),
On 17 April 2010, the Commission published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘Notice of initiation’), on the initiation of anti-subsidy proceedings with regard to imports into the Union of coated fine paper originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or the ‘country concerned’).
Komisija je 17. aprila 2010 objavila obvestilo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“), s katerim je napovedala začetek protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“) v Unijo.
The anti-subsidy proceedings were initiated following a complaint lodged on 4 March 2010 by CEPIFINE, the European association of fine paper manufacturers, (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of the total Union production of coated fine paper.
Protisubvencijski postopek je bil sprožen po pritožbi, ki jo je 4. marca 2010 vložilo Združenje evropskih proizvajalcev finega papirja - CEPIFINE, („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki zavzemajo večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 %, celotne proizvodnje premazanega finega papirja Unije.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of subsidisation of coated fine paper and of material injury resulting that subsidisation, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of proceedings.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o subvencioniranju premazanega finega papirja in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega subvencioniranja nastala, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka.
Prior to the initiation of the proceedings and in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the Government of the PRC (‘the GOC’) that it had received a properly documented complaint alleging that subsidised imports of coated fine paper originating in the PRC were causing material injury to the Union industry.
Pred začetkom postopka in v skladu s členom 10(7) osnovne uredbe je Komisija vlado LRK („kitajska vlada“) obvestila, da je prejela pravilno dokumentirano pritožbo, ki domneva, da je subvencionirani uvoz premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz LRK povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
The GOC was invited for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as regards the contents of the complaint and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Kitajska vlada je bila povabljena na posvetovanja, da se razjasni položaj glede vsebine pritožbe in da se najde sporazumna rešitev.
The GOC accepted the offer of consultations and consultations were subsequently held.
Kitajska vlada je sprejela vabilo na posvetovanja, ki so se nato tudi izvedla.
However, due note was taken of comments made by the authorities of the GOC as regards the allegations contained in the complaint concerning the lack of countervailability of the schemes.
Vendar so se ustrezno upoštevale pripombe pristojnih organov kitajske vlade glede trditev iz pritožbe, da se sheme, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, ne uporabljajo.
Following the consultations, submissions were received from the GOC.
Po posvetovanjih je kitajska vlada predložila svoja stališča.
ANTI-DUMPING PROCEEDING
PROTIDAMPINŠKI POSTOPEK
On 18 February 2010, the Commission published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], on the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of coated fine paper originating in the PRC.
(4) Evropska Komisija je 18. februarja 2010 objavila obvestilo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], s katerim je napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo.
On 17 November 2010, by Regulation (EU) No 1042/10 [4], the Commission imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of coated fine paper originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 17. novembra 2010 z Uredbo (EU) št. 1042/10 [4] uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz premazanega finega papirja s poreklom iz LRK.
The injury analyses performed in the present anti-subsidy and the parallel anti-dumping investigation are identical, since the definition of the Union industry, the representative Union producers and the investigation period are the same in both investigations.
Analizi škode, izvedeni v tej protisubvencijski in vzporedni protidampinški preiskavi, sta identični, saj so opredelitev industrije Unije, reprezentativni proizvajalci Unije in obdobje preiskave v obeh preiskavah enaki.
For this reason, comments on injury aspects put forward in both these proceedings were taken into account in both proceedings.
Zaradi tega so bile pripombe glede vidikov škode, predložene v katerem koli od teh dveh postopkov, upoštevane v obeh postopkih.
The Commission officially notified the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers in the PRC and an association of producers (a paper association), the representatives of the country concerned, known importers and known users of the initiation of the proceedings.
Komisija je pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK in združenje proizvajalcev (papirniško združenje), predstavnike zadevne države, znane uvoznike in znane uporabnike uradno obvestila o začetku postopka.