natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They must have a high level of professional experience in the public or private sector in scientific research, scholarship, or scientific management.
Imeti morajo veliko strokovnih izkušenj iz zasebnega ali javnega sektorja na področju znanstvenih raziskav, šolnin ali vodenja znanstvenih projektov.
Other skills may also be required (e.g. mentoring and education of young scientists; management or evaluation of projects; technology transfer and innovation; international cooperation in science and technology).
Zahtevajo se lahko tudi druge veščine (npr. mentorstvo in izobraževanje mladih znanstvenikov, upravljanje ali ocenjevanje projektov, prenos tehnologij in inovacije, mednarodno sodelovanje v znanosti in tehnologiji).
For the appointment of independent experts dealing with classified information, the appropriate security clearance shall be required.
Za imenovanje neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki obravnavajo zaupne informacije, se zahteva ustrezno dovoljenje za dostop do tajnih podatkov.
The ERCEA has also recourse to the list of experts resulting from calls for applications published in the Official Journal of the European Union, as well as other experts with the necessary qualifications, identified for example, through consultation with national research funding agencies and similar organisations.
ERCEA ima tudi dostop do seznama strokovnjakov, pridobljenih z razpisi za prijave, ki so bili objavljeni v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, in drugih strokovnjakov z ustreznimi kvalifikacijami, najdenih na primer s posvetovanjem z nacionalnimi agencijami za financiranje raziskav in podobnimi organizacijami.
Experts may come from countries other than the Member States or countries associated to FP7.
Strokovnjaki lahko prihajajo tudi iz držav, ki niso države članice ali države, pridružene OP7.
In assembling pools of experts, the ERCEA seeks to ensure the highest level of scientific and technical expertise, in areas appropriate to the call, considering also other criteria, such as:
Pri sestavljanju skupine strokovnjakov poskuša ERCEA zagotoviti najvišjo raven znanstvenega in tehničnega znanja na področju razpisa, tako da upošteva tudi druga merila:
A reasonable inclusion of women and men from across the EU and associated countries as well as third countries [18];Regular rotation of experts, consistent with the need for continuity.
razumno vključevanje žensk in moških iz vse EU, pridruženih držav in tretjih držav [18],redno menjavanje strokovnjakov v skladu s potrebo po kontinuiteti.
On average, a turnover of at least a quarter of the experts used in each research area per calendar year is expected.
V povprečju se pričakuje, da se bo vsako koledarsko leto zamenjala vsaj četrtina strokovnjakov, ki so bili uporabljeni na vsakem od raziskovalnih področij.
Experts must also have the appropriate language skills required for the proposals to be evaluated.
Strokovnjaki morajo imeti tudi ustrezno jezikovno znanje, potrebno za ocenjevanje predlogov.
The names of the independent experts assigned to individual proposals are not made public.
Imena neodvisnih strokovnjakov, dodeljenih posameznim predlogom, se javno ne objavijo.
However, the list of independent experts that have assisted in the evaluation of proposals received under a call related to the Ideas Specific Programme will be published yearly on Commission website(s).
Kljub temu pa se seznam neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki so pomagali pri ocenjevanju predlogov, prejetih na podlagi razpisa, povezanega s posebnim programom „Zamisli“, vsako leto objavi na spletnem mestu ali mestih Komisije.
In addition the list of Panel members will be published on the ERC website.
Poleg tega se seznam članov odbora objavi tudi na spletnem mestu ERC.
Any direct or indirect contact about the peer review evaluation of a call between the PI and/or applicant legal entity submitting a proposal under the same call and any independent expert involved in that peer review evaluation is strictly forbidden.
Vsak neposreden ali posreden stik v zvezi z medsebojnim pregledom razpisa med glavnim raziskovalcem in/ali pravno osebo vlagateljico, ki je oddala predlog na podlagi istega razpisa, ter katerim koli neodvisnim strokovnjakom, ki sodeluje v tem medsebojnem pregledu, je strogo prepovedan.
Any such contact may result in the decision of the ERCEA to exclude the proposal concerned from the call in question.
Zaradi takega stika se lahko ERCEA odloči, da bo zadevni predlog izključila iz zadevnega razpisa.
Applicants may be allowed by the relevant Guide for Applicants to make a request that a specific person [19] would not act as peer reviewer in the evaluation of their proposal.
V ustreznem priročniku za vlagatelje se vlagateljem lahko dovoli, da vložijo prošnjo, da določena oseba [19] ni strokovni ocenjevalec pri medsebojnem pregledu njihovega predloga.
In such cases, applicants will be asked to specify the reasons for their request [20].
V takem primeru se vlagatelja zaprosi, da navede razloge za svojo prošnjo.
Under such circumstances, if the person identified is an independent expert participating in the evaluation of the proposals for the call in question, he/she may be excluded from the evaluation of the proposal concerned, as long as the ERCEA remains in the position to have the proposal evaluated.
Taka oseba, če se ugotovi, da gre za neodvisnega strokovnjaka, ki sodeluje v pregledu predlogov za zadevni razpis, je lahko izključena iz pregleda zadevnega predloga, dokler ERCEA lahko pregleduje predlog.
This section addresses the way in which independent experts are appointed by the ERCEA to assist in the peer review evaluation of proposals submitted under the Ideas Specific Programme.
Ta razdelek obravnava način, na katerega ERCEA imenuje neodvisne strokovnjake, da sodelujejo pri medsebojnem pregledu predlogov, oddanih v okviru posebnega programa „Zamisli“.
The same procedure may be applied mutatis mutandis by the ERCEA for the appointment of experts for the tasks within the meaning of Article 27(1) of the Rules for Participation.
Isti postopek lahko ERCEA smiselno uporabi za imenovanje strokovnjakov za naloge v smislu člena 27(1) Pravil za sodelovanje.
The ERCEA issues an appointment letter to be signed by the independent expert, based on the models approved by the Commission.
ERCEA izda obvestilo o imenovanju, ki temelji na vzorcih, ki jih je odobrila Komisija, da ga neodvisni strokovnjak podpiše.
The appointment letter sets the framework of the relationship between an independent expert and the ERCEA under which he or she may be called to provide expertise to assist the ERC.
Obvestilo o imenovanju določa okvir za razmerje med neodvisnim strokovnjakom in ERCEA, v skladu s katerim se lahko zaprosi za strokovno pomoč ERC.
This appointment letter presents the General Conditions applying to independent experts, in particular, it establishes a Code of conduct for independent experts in peer review evaluations, annexed to the appointment letter, the essential provisions regarding confidentiality, conflict of interest and specifies the treatment of personal data.
To obvestilo o imenovanju vsebuje splošne pogoje, ki veljajo za neodvisne strokovnjake, zlasti pa določa pravila ravnanja neodvisnih strokovnjakov v postopkih medsebojnega pregleda, ki so priložena obvestilu o imenovanju, bistvene določbe o zaupnosti in navzkrižju interesov ter določa, kako je treba ravnati z osebnimi podatki.
The appointment will be effective upon the signature of the appointment letter by the independent expert and the ERCEA.
Imenovanje začne veljati, ko obvestilo o imenovanju podpišeta neodvisni strokovnjak in ERCEA.
Assignments of tasks for Panel Chairs, Panel Members, Panel evaluators and Independent observers are entitled to financial compensation.
Osebe, ki so jim dodeljene naloge predsednika odbora, članov odbora, ocenjevalcev v odboru in neodvisnih opazovalcev, so upravičene do finančnega nadomestila.
In that case the appointment letter will provide the general conditions for compensation.
V tem primeru bo obvestilo o imenovanju določalo tudi splošne pogoje za nadomestilo.
For referees, the assignments of tasks are not eligible for financial compensation.
Osebe, ki so jim dodeljene naloge izvedencev, do nadomestila niso upravičene.
In the context of each task assignment, all independent experts are required to confirm that they have no conflict of interest (disqualifying or potential) for each proposal that they examine.
V okviru dodelitve nalog morajo vsi neodvisni strokovnjaki potrditi, da ne prihaja do navzkrižja interesov (izključitveno ali morebitno) pri vsakem predlogu, ki ga pregledujejo.
If an independent expert identifies a conflict of interest relating to a proposal, the course of action depends on whether it is a disqualifying or a potential conflict of interest.
Če neodvisen strokovnjak ugotovi navzkrižje interesov v zvezi s predlogom, je nadaljnje ukrepanje odvisno od tega, ali gre za izključitveno ali morebitno navzkrižje interesov.
Circumstances in which ‘disqualifying’ and ‘potential’ conflicts of interest may exist are described in the Code of Conduct.
Okoliščine, v katerih lahko obstaja izključitveno in morebitno navzkrižje interesov, so opisane v pravilih ravnanja.
Independent experts may not participate in the evaluation of proposals to a call to which he/she has himself/herself submitted a proposal.
Neodvisni strokovnjaki ne smejo sodelovati v pregledu predlogov za razpis, v okviru katerega so sami predložili predlog.
When a disqualifying conflict of interest exists an independent expert must not influence the peer review evaluation of the proposal concerned.
Kadar obstaja izključitveno navzkrižje interesov, neodvisni strokovnjak ne sme vplivati na medsebojni pregled zadevnega predloga.
In particular an independent expert shall then neither assist in the individual assessment (usually remote), nor speak and vote in any Panel discussion related to this proposal.
Neodvisni strokovnjak v tem primeru še zlasti ne sme pomagati pri posameznem ocenjevanju (po navadi na daljavo) ter govoriti in glasovati v nobeni razpravi odbora, povezani s tem predlogom.
In such a case the independent expert shall leave the room (or electronic forum) when the Panel discusses the individual case of the proposal where such a conflict exists.
Neodvisni strokovnjak v tem primeru zapusti sobo (ali elektronski forum), kadar odbor razpravlja o posameznem predlogu, pri katerem tako navzkrižje obstaja.
When a potential conflict of interest exists, the ERCEA will consider the circumstances of the case and make a decision.
Kadar obstaja morebitno navzkrižje interesov, ERCEA preuči okoliščine primera in sprejme odločitev.
It may be decided whether to allow the independent expert to take part in the peer review evaluation of the proposal concerned (the expert must then sign a declaration to that effect) or to exclude him/her in the same manner as for a disqualifying conflict.
Odloči se lahko, ali neodvisnemu strokovnjaku dovoli, da sodeluje pri medsebojnem pregledu zadevnega predloga (strokovnjak mora nato podpisati izjavo o tem), ali pa ga izključi enako kot pri izključitvenem navzkrižju interesov.
An expert must declare any known conflicts of interest before a peer review evaluation session.
Strokovnjak mora prijaviti vsako navzkrižje interesov, za katerega ve, pred začetkom postopka medsebojnega pregleda.
If a hitherto unsuspected conflict becomes apparent during the course of the peer review evaluation, the independent expert must announce the fact immediately to a responsible official.
Če se med medsebojnim pregledom pokaže do takrat neznano navzkrižje interesov, mora neodvisni strokovnjak to dejstvo nemudoma sporočiti odgovornemu uradniku.
If the conflict is finally found to be a disqualifying one, the independent expert must abstain from further peer review evaluation involving the proposal concerned.
Če se na koncu ugotovi, da je bilo navzkrižje interesov izključitveno, se mora neodvisni strokovnjak izključiti iz medsebojnega pregleda, ki vključuje zadevni predlog.
Any comments and scores made earlier by that independent expert will be discounted.
Vse pripombe in ocene, ki jih je ta neodvisni strokovnjak predložil prej, se ne upoštevajo.
If necessary, the independent expert will be replaced.
Po potrebi se neodvisni strokovnjak zamenja.
If an independent expert knowingly conceals a disqualifying or potential conflict of interest, and this is discovered during the peer review evaluation session, the independent expert will be immediately excluded, and the sanctions foreseen in the appointment letter will apply.
Če neodvisni strokovnjak zavedno prikrije izključitveno ali morebitno navzkrižje interesov in se to ugotovi med postopkom medsebojnega pregleda, se ga nemudoma izključi, uporabijo pa se sankcije, predvidene v obvestilu o imenovanju.
Any peer review evaluation session results in which he or she has participated will be declared null and void, and the proposal(s) concerned will be re-evaluated.
Rezultati vseh postopkov medsebojnega pregleda, v katerih je ta neodvisni strokovnjak sodeloval, se razglasijo za nične in neveljavne, zadevni predlogi pa se znova ocenijo.
By analogy with article 265a(3) of the Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation [21], a breach of the Code of Conduct or other serious misconduct by the independent expert may be qualified as grave professional misconduct and may lead to the exclusion of this independent expert from the list of independent experts to be appointed by the ERCEA.
Po analogiji s členom 265a (§ 3) Izvedbenih pravil za finančno uredbo [21] je kršitev pravil ravnanja ali drugo resno kršitev neodvisnega strokovnjaka mogoče opredeliti kot hujšo kršitev poklicnih pravil in lahko pripelje do izključitve tega neodvisnega strokovnjaka s seznama neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki jih lahko imenuje ERCEA.
Independent experts may be appointed as observers to examine the peer review evaluation process from the point of view of its working and execution.
Neodvisni strokovnjaki so lahko imenovani kot opazovalci za ocenjevanje medsebojnega pregleda z vidika njegovega delovanja in izvajanja.
The remit of observers covers the entire peer review evaluation session, including any remote assessments.
Pristojnost opazovalcev vključuje celoten postopek medsebojnega pregleda, vključno z morebitnimi ocenami na daljavo.
In the remote case, observers have access to all communications between the ERCEA and the peer reviewers and may make contact with some or all peer reviewers to poll their opinions on the conduct of the peer review evaluation.
Pri pregledu na daljavo imajo opazovalci dostop do vseh sporočil med ERCEA in strokovnimi ocenjevalci ter lahko stopijo v stik z nekaterimi ali vsemi strokovnimi ocenjevalci, da pridobijo njihova mnenja o izvedbi medsebojnega pregleda.
Observers have access to any meetings that are part of the peer review evaluation session.
Opazovalci imajo dostop do vseh sestankov, ki so del postopkov medsebojnega pregleda.
The ERCEA concludes an appointment letter with each independent observer.
ERCEA podpiše obvestilo o imenovanju z vsakim od neodvisnih opazovalcev.
The model approved by the Commission will be used for the appointment of independent observers.
Za imenovanje neodvisnih opazovalcev se uporabi vzorec, ki ga je odobrila Komisija.
The specific Code of conduct for observers of the peer review evaluation process is provided in the model approved by the Commission.
Posebna pravila ravnanja za opazovalce medsebojnega pregleda so navedena v vzorcu, ki ga je odobrila Komisija.
The ERCEA will inform the Programme committee of the choice of experts as observers, and their terms of reference.
ERCEA programski odbor obvesti o izbiri strokovnjakov za opazovalce in opisu njihovih nalog.
The task of the observers is to look at the operation of peer review evaluation sessions from the point of view of their working and not the outcome, unless the outcome of the peer review evaluations is a direct result of the operational aspects.
Naloga opazovalcev je opazovati potek postopkov medsebojnega pregleda z vidika njihovega delovanja in ne njihovega rezultata, razen če je rezultat medsebojnega pregleda neposredno povezan z operativnimi vidiki.
For this reason, it is not necessary that the observers have expertise in the area of the proposals being evaluated.
Zato ni nujno, da so opazovalci strokovnjaki s področja predlogov v ocenjevanju.
Indeed, it is considered advantageous to avoid having observers with too intimate a knowledge of the particular S & T area in order to avoid conflicts between their opinions on the outcome of the peer review evaluations and the functioning of the sessions.
Pravzaprav se šteje za prednost, če opazovalci nimajo preveč poglobljenega znanja na zadevnem znanstvenem in tehničnem področju, da ne bi prihajalo do nasprotij med njihovimi mnenji o izidu medsebojnega pregleda in delovanjem posameznih pregledov.
In any case, they will not express views on the proposals under examination or the independent experts’ opinions on the proposals.
V nobenem primeru pa opazovalci ne izražajo svojih pogledov na predloge v ocenjevanju ali posredujejo mnenj neodvisnih strokovnjakov o predlogih.
The role of the observers is to give independent advice on the conduct of the peer review evaluation sessions, ways in which the procedures could be improved and the way in which the independent experts apply the evaluation criteria.
Vloga opazovalcev je, da dajejo neodvisne nasvete o vodenju postopkov medsebojnega pregleda, načinih, kako izboljšati postopke in kako neodvisni ocenjevalci uporabljajo merila za pregled.
The observers verify that the procedures set out or referred to in these rules are adhered to and report to the programme management on ways in which the process could be improved.
Opazovalci preverjajo, ali se upoštevajo postopki, ki so opredeljeni v teh pravilih oziroma se pravila nanje nanašajo, in programski upravi poročajo o načinih, kako bi ta postopek lahko izboljšali.
Observers are required to respect the same confidentiality obligations as independent experts and to sign appointment letters including confidentiality agreements.
Opazovalci imajo enake obveznosti glede zaupnosti kot neodvisni strokovnjaki in morajo podpisati obvestilo o imenovanju, vključno s sporazumom o zaupnosti.
They are not permitted to divulge details of the proposals, the independent experts assigned to examining the proposals, nor the discussions in the peer review evaluation Panels.
Ne smejo razkrivati podrobnosti o predlogih, imen neodvisnih strokovnjakov, imenovanih za ocenjevanje predlogov, in vsebine razprav v odborih za medsebojni pregled.
The observers report their findings to the ERC.
Opazovalci svoje ugotovitve sporočijo ERC.
The observers are also encouraged to enter into informal discussions with the ERCEA officials involved in the peer review evaluation sessions and to make observations on any possible improvements that could be put into practice immediately.
Hkrati je zaželeno, da opazovalci sodelujejo v neuradnih razpravah z uradniki ERCEA, vključenimi v postopke medsebojnega pregleda, in da izrazijo svoja opažanja glede morebitnih izboljšav, ki bi jih bilo mogoče nemudoma izvesti.
The ERCEA will inform the programme committee of the observers’ findings and may make available publicly a summary of their report.
ERCEA obvesti programski odbor o ugotovitvah opazovalcev in lahko objavi povzetek njihovega poročila.
Carrying out observation of peer review evaluation is subject to the maxima indicated in the specific assignment.
Opazovanje medsebojnega pregleda je v skladu z maksimo, navedeno v določeni dodeljeni nalogi.
The maxima indicated in the assignment may be extended by written amendment.
Maksimo, ki je navedena v dodeljeni nalogi, je mogoče razširiti s spremembo v pisni obliki.
The evaluation criteria, including any proposal scoring and associated weights and thresholds, are set out in the Ideas work programme, based on principles set out in the Ideas Specific Programme and in the Rules for participation [22].
Merila za pregled, vključno z morebitnim ocenjevanjem predloga ter s tem povezanimi deleži in mejnimi vrednostmi, so določena v delovnem programu „Zamisli“, temeljijo pa na načelih, določenih v posebnem programu „Zamisli“ in Pravilih za sodelovanje [22]. Način, na katerega se uporabljajo, je lahko dodatno pojasnjen v priročniku za vlagatelje.
Special procedures are applied for proposals with ethically sensitive issues (see Annex B), or which require further scrutiny with regard to security considerations (see Annex D).
Posebni postopki se uporabljajo za predloge z občutljivimi etičnimi vprašanji (glej Prilogo B) ali predloge, ki zahtevajo nadaljnji podrobni pregled glede varnostnih vprašanj (glej Prilogo D).
The ERC Scientific Council establishes the peer review evaluation methodology, which may vary in detail for different calls, and oversees the peer review evaluation process and establishes rules of procedure for ERC Panels published on the ERC website (Guide for ERC Peer Reviewers).
Znanstveni svet ERC določi metodologijo za medsebojne preglede, ki se lahko med različnimi razpisi razlikuje v podrobnostih, poleg tega nadzoruje postopek medsebojnih pregledov in določa poslovnik za odbore ERC, ki se objavi na spletnem mestu ERC (priročnik za strokovne ocenjevalce ERC).
The ERC Scientific Council may also delegate its members to be present during the Panel meetings as observers.
Znanstveni svet ERC lahko člane določi, da se sestankov odborov udeležijo kot opazovalci.
However, Scientific Council members shall not influence, under any circumstances, the outcome of the Panel meeting they attend.
Člani znanstvenega odbora pod nobenim pogojem ne smejo vplivati na izid sestanka odbora, ki se ga udeležijo.
The peer review evaluation is organised on the basis of the principles set out in section 2.1 above, to ensure a consistent, rigorous, quality-based assessment of proposals against the criteria set out in the Ideas work programme.
Medsebojni pregled se organizira na podlagi načel, določenih v poglavju 2.1, da se tako zagotovi skladen in strog pregled predlogov glede na merila, določena v delovnem programu „Zamisli“, ki temelji na kakovosti. Kadar se v razpisu uporablja dvostopenjski postopek pregleda, gredo v nadaljnji medsebojni pregled le tisti predlogi, ki so na prvi stopnji uspešno prestali ocenjevanje izpolnjevanja omejenega sklopa meril.
The peer review evaluation is carried out by means of Panels of independent scientists and scholars.
Medsebojni pregled opravijo odbori neodvisnih znanstvenikov in akademikov.
Panels may be assisted by panel evaluators and specialist referees, who perform the peer review evaluation fully or partially at their home or place of work (‘remote evaluation’).
Odborom lahko pomagajo ocenjevalci odbora in izvedenci specialisti, ki medsebojni pregled v celoti ali delno opravijo doma ali na svojem delovnem mestu („pregled na daljavo“).
Panels are established to span the spectrum of research areas covered by the call, each Panel having responsibility for a particular set of research fields.
Odbori se ustanovijo tako, da pokrivajo celoten spekter področij raziskav, ki jih vključuje razpis, pri tem pa je vsak odbor odgovoren za določeno skupino raziskovalnih področij.
Panels operate, according to the rules of procedure for ERC Panels mentioned above, under the chairmanship of a senior independent expert.
Odbori delujejo, v skladu z že prej omenjenim poslovnikom za odbore ERC, pod vodstvom višjega neodvisnega strokovnjaka.
Any peer review evaluation may be organised in two subsequent steps.
Vsak postopek medsebojnega pregleda se lahko organizira v obliki dveh zaporednih korakov.
In such case, the outcome of the first step is the input for the second step.
V takem primeru se rezultati iz prvega koraka uporabijo kot vhodni podatki za drugega.
The sequence of events in a step is usually as follows:
Običajno zaporedje dogodkov v koraku je:
Allocation of proposals to Panels Each proposal is allocated to a Panel on the basis of the subject-matter of the proposal.
Dodelitev predlogov odborom vsak predlog se dodeli odboru na podlagi teme predloga.