natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The two representations above have not altered the provisional conclusions.
Zgornji stališči ne spreminjata začasnih sklepnih ugotovitev.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (96) to (113) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave od (96) do (113) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The sole cooperating Chinese exporting producer made comments on the underselling calculation.
Edini sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je predložil pripombe glede izračuna nelojalnega nižanja cen.
Where warranted, adjustments were made at the definitive stage.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene v zaključni fazi, če so bile utemeljene.
The Chinese producer submitted a claim in relation to the injury margin that was similar to that set out in recital (51) of this Regulation.
Kitajski proizvajalec je predložil trditev v zvezi s stopnjo škode, ki je bila podobna tisti v uvodni izjavi (51) te uredbe.
This claim had to be rejected for the same reasons as those stated in recital (51).
To trditev je bilo treba zavrniti zaradi istih razlogov, kot so navedeni v navedeni uvodni izjavi.
The Chinese producer also sought clarifications on the method used to set the pre-tax profit margin and, in particular, to which year this profit margin refers.
Kitajski proizvajalec je zaprosil tudi za pojasnila glede metode, uporabljene za določitev stopnje dobička pred obdavčitvijo, in zlasti, na katero leto se ta stopnja dobička nanaša.
In this respect, it is noted that the pre-tax profit setting was the result of an analysis of data referring to the financial years 2006 and 2007.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da je določitev dobička pred obdavčitvijo temeljila na analizi podatkov za finančni leti 2006 in 2007.
The calculations made on the definitive dumping margin and the definitive injury elimination level led to the latter being lower than the former.
Izračun na podlagi dokončne stopnje dampinga in dokončne odprave škode je pokazal, da je od obeh slednja nižja.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (114) to (117) of the provisional Regulation, as modified in recitals (123) to (126) of this Regulation, are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave od (114) do (117) začasne uredbe, kakor so določene v uvodnih izjavah od (123) do 126) te uredbe, potrdijo.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the lowest of the dumping and injury margins found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Na podlagi sklepnih ugotovitev v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije ter v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na najnižji stopnji ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
This was calculated at 34 % having fallen significantly since the provisional stage, when the duty rate was set at the level of the dumping found.
Škoda, izračunana na 34 %, od začasne faze, ko je bila dajatev določena na stopnjo ugotovljenega dampinga, se je znatno zmanjšala.
On the basis of the above, the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty for the PRC is 34 %.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve za LRK 34 %.
In line with recital (120) of the provisional Regulation, for reasons of careful monitoring of the effectiveness of the measures, the relevant authorities of Member States are requested to provide to the Commission on a confidential and periodic basis information concerning EU public procurement proceedings leading to sales of cargo scanning systems.
V skladu z uvodno izjavo (120) začasne uredbe se zaradi natančnega spremljanja učinkovitosti ukrepov od ustreznih organov držav članic zahteva, naj Komisiji zaupno in redno posredujejo informacije o postopkih javnih naročil EU, ki vodijo k prodaji sistemov za preglede tovora.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margin found and given the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the duty definitively imposed by this Regulation.
Glede na višino ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in glede na raven škode, povzročene industriji Unije, se zdi nujno, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, dokončno poberejo v obsegu višine dajatev, dokončno uvedenih s to uredbo.
Since the definitive duty is lower than the provisional duty, the amounts secured in excess of the definitive duty rate shall be released,
Ker je dokončna dajatev nižja od začasne dajatve, se zneski, ki so zavarovani in presegajo dokončno stopnjo dajatve, sprostijo –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on systems for the scanning of cargo, based on the use of neutron technology or based on the use of X-rays with an X-ray source of 250 KeV or more or based on the use of gamma radiations, currently falling within CN codes ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 and ex90301000 (TARIC codes 9022190010, 9022290010, 9027801710 and 9030100091) and motor vehicles equipped with such systems currently falling within CN code ex87059090 (TARIC code 8705909010) originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na sisteme za preglede tovora z uporabo nevtronske tehnologije ali rentgenskih žarkov z virom rentgenskega sevanja najmanj 250 KeV ali z uporabo gama žarkov, ki trenutno spadajo pod oznake KN ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 in ex90301000 (oznake TARIC 9022190010, 9022290010, 9027801710 in 9030100091), ter tovorna vozila, opremljena s takimi sistemi, ki trenutno spadajo pod oznako KN ex87059090 (oznaka TARIC 8705909010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at- Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 shall be 34 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelke iz odstavka 1 znaša 34 %.
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1242/2009 on imports of systems for the scanning of cargo, based on the use of neutron technology or based on the use of X-rays with an X-ray source of 250 KeV or more or based on the use of gamma radiations, currently falling within CN codes ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 and ex90301000 (TARIC codes 9022190010, 9022290010, 9027801710 and 9030100091) and motor vehicles equipped with such systems currently falling within CN code ex87059090 (TARIC code 8705909010) originating in the People’s Republic of China shall be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive duty imposed pursuant to Article 1.
Zneski, ki so na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1242/2009 zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo na sisteme za preglede tovora z uporabo nevtronske tehnologije ali rentgenskih žarkov z virom rentgenskega sevanja najmanj 250 KeV ali z uporabo gama žarkov, ki trenutno spadajo pod oznake KN ex90221900, ex90222900, ex90278017 in ex90301000 (oznake TARIC 9022190010, 9022290010, 9027801710 in 9030100091), ter tovorna vozila, opremljena s takimi sistemi, ki trenutno spadajo pod oznako KN ex87059090 (oznaka TARIC 8705909010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se dokončno poberejov skladu s členom 1.
The amounts secured in excess of the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo višino dokončne protidampinške dajatve, se sprostijo.
OJ L 332, 17.12.2009, p. 60.
UL L 332, 17.12.2009, str. 60.
OJ L 104, 23.4.1994, p. 5.
UL L 104, 23.4.1994, str. 5.
OJ L 83, 13.4.1995, p. 8.
UL L 83, 13.4.1995, str. 8.
The Chinese producer also submitted that the signature of the contract captures all transactions at a certain point in time regardless as to whether a sale is made through a tendering process and thus there is no need for an extended IP.
Kitajski proizvajalec je prav tako trdil, da so s podpisom pogodbe zajete vse transakcije v nekem obdobju ne glede na to, ali se prodaja izvede na podlagi razpisnega postopka ali ne, ter da zato ni potrebe po daljšem OP.
This argument is not convincing because it does not address the basic problem of the relatively few number of transactions in this market.
Ta trditev ni prepričljiva, ker ne odpravlja osnovne težave, in sicer sorazmerno majhnega števila transakcij v tej panogi.
Such contract was indeed concluded in 2005, but the respective individual quotes for tender and signing of contracts took place in 2007, i.e. already within the IP.
Javni razpis je bil leta 2005 res organiziran, vendar ni vključeval nobenih cen. Poleg tega so zadevne posamezne ponudbe in podpisi pogodb potekali leta 2007, tj. že med OP.
Therefore the Commission was satisfied that this tender should be taken into account in the IP and form part of the data for calculating the dumping margin.
To je bilo posledica posebnega razpisnega postopka vlade ZDA in njenih agencij. Zato je bilo potrjeno, da je treba ta razpis upoštevati v OP in ga vključiti med podatke za izračun stopnje dampinga.
It was in fact a replacement product and the price to which it refers was agreed a number of years before the IP.
Dejansko se je nanašala na nadomestni izdelek, pri čemer je bila zadevna cena dogovorjena več let pred OP.
The replacement product was of a completely different type as the original product.
Nadomestni izdelek je bil popolnoma druge vrste kot prvotni izdelek.
Moreover, for reasons of comparability, it would have been necessary to also reallocate the sales in periods preceding the IP.
Poleg tega bi bilo zaradi primerljivosti treba prerazporediti tudi prodajo v obdobjih pred OP.
The claim was therefore not accepted.
Zato ta trditev ni bila sprejeta.
As regards the remaining transactions the Chinese producer refers to a transaction not falling in the IP, which as explained in recital (42), is in fact a settlement of a contract concluded previously. It also referred to a transaction in which the Union industry did not participate to the tender.
Kar zadeva preostale transakcije, se kitajski proizvajalec sklicuje na transakcijo, ki ne spada v OP in je, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (42), dejansko izpolnitev v preteklosti sklenjene pogodbe, ter transakcijo, pri kateri industrija Unije ni sodelovala na razpisu.
No other representation was submitted that could put into doubt the provisional findings that all the remaining technologies (apart from alpha and beta) covered by the product scope can be used in cargo scanners and all product types serve the same purpose, namely to scan cargo by using the same main principal feature, i.e. the emission of radiation concentrated in scanning cargo. Indeed, during the IP, gamma-based units of the product concerned were sold in the EU.
Predložen ni bil noben drug prikaz, ki bi nasprotoval začasnim ugotovitvam, da je mogoče v pregledovalnikih tovora uporabiti vse preostale tehnologije (razen alfa in beta), zajete v obsegu izdelka, in da se vse vrste izdelka uporabljajo za enak namen, ki je pregledovanje tovora z uporabo enake glavne značilnosti, torej emisije žarkov, usmerjenih v pregledovanje tovora.
It claimed that if the Commission used a normal value on the basis of a tender that took place in 2005 and compared it with the export price relating to the IP, then such comparison could not be considered to be fair. This allegation is not borne out by the facts established in the investigation.
Trdil je, da primerjava ni poštena, če Komisija uporabi normalno vrednost na podlagi razpisa iz leta 2005 in jo primerja z izvozno ceno za OP.
In the US, public tenders are organised to award a framework contract under which the winner of the tender can sell for a certain period of time. The framework contract did not, however, contain any prices.
Dejstva, ugotovljena med preiskavo, te trditve ne potrjujejo.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 511/2010
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the European Commission (Commission) after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom predložila Evropska komisija (Komisija),
The Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1247/2009 [2] (the ‘provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘country concerned’).
Komisija je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1247/2009 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“).
The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged by the European Association of Metals (EUROMETAUX) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of a producer representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of the total Union production of molybdenum wires.
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je vložilo Evropsko združenje za kovine (EUROMETAUX) („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalca, ki predstavlja večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 %, celotne proizvodnje žic iz molibdena v Uniji.
As set out in recital 13 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (13) začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2008 do 31. marca 2009 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of the trends for the assessment of injury covered the period from March 2005 to the end of the IP (‘period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od marca 2005 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional anti-dumping measures (‘provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions making their views known on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev za uvedbo začasnih protidampinških ukrepov („začasno razkritje“), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami.
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Strani, ki so to zahtevale, so imele tudi možnost za zaslišanje.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the provisional findings were modified accordingly.
Po proučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile začasne ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (‘final disclosure’).
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz LRK in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
In the absence of any comments concerning the product concerned and the like product, recitals (14) to (17) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, se uvodne izjave od (14) do (17) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Market Economy Treatment (MET) — Individual Treatment (IT)
Tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“) – individualna obravnava („IO“)
In the absence of any comments concerning the MET and IT findings, recitals (18) to (23) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede ugotovitev v zvezi s TGO in IO, se uvodne izjave od (18) do (23) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the disclosure of the provisional findings, the cooperating exporting producer contested the use of the export prices from the USA to other countries (including the Union) as a basis for the determination of the normal value for the PRC.
Po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev je sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik nasprotoval uporabi izvoznih cen iz ZDA v druge države (vključno z Unijo) kot osnovi za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK.
Instead, it proposed to use the price actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product because it considered that normal value determined on this basis would yield a lower dumping margin for the PRC.
Namesto tega je predlagal uporabo cene, ki je bila dejansko plačana ali se plačuje v Uniji za podoben izdelek, saj je menil, da bi normalna vrednost, določena na tej podlagi, dala nižjo stopnjo dampinga za LRK.
The same producer claimed that the normal value should be adjusted downwards in order to account for the efficiencies it enjoys as a vertically integrated producer in comparison with the complainant or the analogue country producer which do not have mining facilities for the main raw material, the molybdenum ore.
Ta proizvajalec je trdil, da je treba normalno vrednost prilagoditi navzdol, da bi upoštevali prednosti, ki jih uživa kot vertikalno integriran proizvajalec v primerjavi s pritožnikom ali proizvajalcem iz primerljive države, ki nimata rudnikov za glavno surovino, molibdenovo rudo.
Regarding the first claim it is noted that the use of prices paid or payable in the Union is an option provided for in Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation to be used only when the other options provided for in the same Article cannot be applied.
Glede prve trditve je treba spomniti, da je uporaba cen, ki so bile plačane ali se plačujejo v Uniji, možnost, predvidena s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe, ki se uporabi samo tedaj, ko se druge možnosti, predvidene v tem členu, ne morejo uporabiti.
Since in this proceeding cooperation was obtained from a third country producer, and it was thus possible to use the option of a price from the market economy third country to other countries, there is no legal justification to apply the residual option of Article 2(7)(a).
Ker je bilo v tem postopku pridobljeno sodelovanje proizvajalca iz tretje države in se je zato lahko uporabila možnost, ki predvideva uporabo cene, ki jo tretja država s tržnim gospodarstvom zaračunava drugim državam, ni pravne utemeljitve za uporabo preostale možnosti iz člena 2(7)(a).
The claim was therefore, rejected.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Regarding the second claim it is noted that that the cooperating producer did not provide any evidence to demonstrate that the level of integration of producers is a factor that affects prices and price comparability.
Glede druge trditve se ugotavlja, da sodelujoči proizvajalec ni predložil dokazov, ki bi dokazovali, da je raven integracije proizvajalcev dejavnik, ki vpliva na cene in primerljivost cen.
Certain parties questioned the choice of the analogue country producer in view of the fact that this company in the USA is a daughter company of the complainant.
Nekatere strani so podvomile o izbiri proizvajalca iz primerljive države zaradi dejstva, da je družba v ZDA hčerinska družba pritožnika.
In this regard it is noted that the fact that a company in the proposed analogue country is a related company of the complainant did not preclude that the information obtained was reliable and verifiable.
Glede tega se poudarja, da dejstvo, da je neka družba v predlagani primerljivi državi povezana družba pritožnika, ne izključuje verodostojnosti in preverljivosti pridobljenih informacij.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the normal value, which would alter the provisional findings, recitals (24) to (25) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb k normalni vrednosti, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodni izjavi (24) in (25) začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of any comments concerning the export price, recital (26) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izvozno ceno ni bilo pripomb, se uvodna izjava (26) začasne uredbe potrdi.
It is noted that the indirect taxation adjustment mentioned in recital (27) of the provisional Regulation is 5 % and represents the difference between the VAT payable on domestic sales and that payable on the export sales transactions due account being taken of the VAT refund rate on export sales.
Ugotavlja se, da znaša prilagoditev posrednega obdavčenja iz uvodne izjave (27) začasne uredbe 5 % in predstavlja razliko med DDV, ki se plačuje pri domači prodaji, in DDV, ki se plačuje pri izvoznih prodajnih transakcijah, ob ustreznem upoštevanju stopnje vračila DDV za izvoz.
The cooperating exporting producer contested the manner in which this adjustment was applied and claimed that it should rather be calculated as a factor decreasing the export price.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je nasprotoval načinu uporabe te prilagoditve in je trdil, da bi jo bilo primerneje izračunati kot dejavnik, ki zmanjšuje izvozno ceno.
Regarding this claim it is noted that the adjustment was based on the provisions of Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation which provides for an adjustment to normal value for import charges and indirect taxes — a category which includes VAT.
Glede te trditve se ugotavlja, da je prilagoditev temeljila na določbah člena 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe, ki predvideva prilagoditev normalne vrednosti za uvozne stroške in posredne davke, tj. kategorijo, ki vključuje DDV.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the comparison, which would alter the provisional findings, recital (27) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb k primerjavi, ki bi spremenile začasne ugotovitve, se uvodna izjava (27) začasne uredbe potrdi.
Based on the above, the country-wide dumping established in recitals (28) to (29) of the provisional Regulation at 68,4 % is hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se potrdi damping na ravni države v višini 68,4 %, ugotovljen v uvodnih izjavah (28) do (29) začasne uredbe.
It is recalled that in order to protect the business confidential information of the sole Union producer that fully cooperated, all the figures related to sensitive data provided below have been indexed or given in a range.
Poudarja se, da so zaradi zaščite zaupnih poslovnih informacij edinega proizvajalca Unije, ki je polno sodeloval, vse spodaj navedene vrednosti, povezane z občutljivimi podatki, indeksirane ali navedene v okvirni vrednosti.
In the absence of any comments concerning the Union production recitals (30) to (31) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi s proizvodnjo Unije, se uvodni izjavi (30) in (31) začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of any comments concerning the definition of the Union industry, recital (32) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z opredelitvijo industrije Unije, se potrdi uvodna izjava (32) začasne uredbe.
Regarding recital (33) of the provisional Regulation it is noted that on the basis of comments received by one interested party a clerical error was detected.
Glede uvodne izjave (33) začasne uredbe se ugotavlja, da je bila na podlagi pripomb, ki jih je prejela ena zainteresirana stran, odkrita pisna napaka.