natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Decision No 716/2009/EC is hereby amended in so far as CEIOPS is removed from the list of beneficiaries set out in Section B of the Annex to that Decision.
Sklep št. 716/2009/ES se spremeni tako, da se CEIOPS odstrani s seznama upravičencev iz oddelka B Priloge k navedenemu sklepu.
Commission Decision 2009/79/EC, establishing CEIOPS, is hereby repealed with effect from 1 January 2011.
Sklep Komisije 2009/79/ES o ustanovitvi CEIOPS se razveljavi z učinkom od 1. januarja 2011.
the convergence in supervisory practices reached by competent authorities,
konvergenca, ki so jo dosegli pristojni organi pri nadzornih praksah;
European Court Reports 2006 Page I-03771, para. 44.
Poročila Sodišča 2006, stran I-03771, odstavek 44.
The power to adopt regulatory technical standards referred to in Article 10 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of four years from 16 December 2010.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje regulativnih tehničnih standardov iz člena 10 se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje štirih let od 16. decembra 2010.
The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegated power not later than 6 months before the end of the four-year period.
Komisija pripravi poročilo o pooblastilu najpozneje šest mesecev pred iztekom štiriletnega obdobja.
The Authority should assume all current tasks and powers of the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. Commission Decision 2009/79/EC should therefore be repealed on the date of the establishment of the Authority, and Decision No 716/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 establishing a Community programme to support specific activities in the field of financial services, financial reporting and auditing [47] should be amended accordingly.
Organ bi moral prevzeti vse sedanje naloge in pooblastila Odbora evropskih nadzornikov za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine, zato bi bilo treba Sklep Komisije 2009/79/ES z dnem ustanovitve Organa razveljaviti, Sklep št. 716/2009/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi programa Skupnosti za podpiranje posebnih dejavnosti na področju finančnih storitev, računovodskega poročanja in revizije [47] pa ustrezno spremeniti.
The revenues of the Authority, a European body in accordance with Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [50] (hereinafter the ‘Financial Regulation’), shall consist, in particular, of any combination of the following: (a) obligatory contributions from the national public authorities competent for the supervision of financial institutions, which shall be made in accordance with a formula based on the weighting of votes set out in Article 3(3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions.
Prihodki Organa, ki je evropski organ v skladu s členom 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [50] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Finančna uredba), so zlasti katera koli kombinacija naslednjega:(a) obvezni prispevki nacionalnih javnih organov, pristojnih za nadzor nad finančnimi institucijami; ki se zagotovijo v skladu s enačbo, ki temelji na ponderiranju glasov iz člena 3(3) Protokola (št. 36) o prehodni ureditvi.
Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1095/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC
o ustanovitvi Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge) in o spremembi Sklepa št. 716/2009/ES ter razveljavitvi Sklepa Komisije 2009/77/ES
The European Council, in its conclusions of 19 June 2009, confirmed that a European System of Financial Supervisors, comprising three new European Supervisory Authorities, should be established.
Evropski svet je v svojih sklepih z dne 19. junija 2009 potrdil, da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti evropski sistem finančnih nadzornikov, ki ga sestavljajo trije novi evropski nadzorni organi.
The system should be aimed at upgrading the quality and consistency of national supervision, strengthening oversight of cross-border groups and establishing a European single rule book applicable to all financial market participants in the internal market.
Sistem bi moral biti usmerjen k izboljšanju kakovosti in doslednosti nacionalnega nadzora, krepitvi nadzora čezmejnih skupin ter pripravi enotnih evropskih pravil, ki se na notranjem trgu uporabljajo za vse udeležence na finančnem trgu.
It emphasised that the European Supervisory Authorities should also have supervisory powers in relation to credit rating agencies and invited the Commission to prepare concrete proposals on how the European System of Financial Supervisors could play a strong role in crisis situations, while stressing that decisions taken by the European Supervisory Authorities should not impinge on the fiscal responsibilities of Member States.
Evropski svet je poudaril, da bi morali imeti Evropski nadzorni organi tudi pooblastila za nadzor nad bonitetnimi agencijami, in Komisijo pozval, naj pripravi konkretne predloge, kako bi lahko evropski sistem finančnih nadzornikov imel pomembno vlogo v kriznih razmerah, hkrati pa je poudaril, da odločitve, ki bi jih sprejeli Evropski nadzorni organi, ne bi smele vplivati na fiskalne odgovornosti držav članic.
The Commission has presented a Proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies [11].
Komisija je predložila predlog uredbe o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o bonitetnih agencijah [11].
The European Parliament and the Council should consider that proposal in order to ensure that European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) (hereinafter the Authority’) will have adequate supervisory powers over credit rating agencies, bearing in mind that the Authority should execute exclusive supervisory powers over Credit Rating Agencies entrusted to it in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala preučiti ta predlog z namenom zagotoviti, da bo imel Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Organ) ustrezna nadzorna pooblastila nad bonitetnimi agencijami, ob upoštevanju, da bi moral organ izvajati izključna pooblastila za nadzor nad bonitetnimi agencijami, ki so mu bila dodeljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009.
For that purpose, the Authority should have appropriate powers of investigation and enforcement as specified in the relevant legislation, as well as the possibility of charging fees.
V ta namen bi moral imeti Organ ustrezna pooblastila za preiskovanje in izvrševanje, kakor je določeno v ustrezni zakonodaji, ter možnost zaračunavanja pristojbin.
The Union cannot remain in a situation where there is no mechanism to ensure that national supervisors arrive at the best possible supervisory decisions for cross-border financial market participants; where there is insufficient cooperation and information exchange between national supervisors; where joint action by national authorities requires complicated arrangements to take account of the patchwork of regulatory and supervisory requirements; where national solutions are most often the only feasible option in responding to problems at the level of the Union; and where different interpretations of the same legal text exist.
Unija ne more ostati v položaju, v katerem nima nobenega mehanizma za zagotovitev, da nacionalni nadzorniki sprejemajo najboljše mogoče nadzorne odločitve za čezmejne udeležence na finančnem trgu, ko ni zadostnega sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij med nacionalnimi nadzorniki, v katerem skupni ukrepi nacionalnih organov zaradi upoštevanja najrazličnejših regulativnih in nadzornih zahtev zahtevajo zapleteno ureditev, ko so nacionalne rešitve najpogosteje edina izvedljiva možnost pri odzivu na težave na ravni Unije in v katerem obstajajo različne razlage istega pravnega besedila.
Greater harmonisation and the coherent application of rules for financial market participants across the Union should also be achieved.
Doseči bi bilo treba tudi večjo usklajenost in skladno uporabo pravil za udeležence na finančnem trgu po vsej Uniji.
In addition to the Authority, a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) and a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) as well as a Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (hereinafter the Joint Committee’) should be established.
Poleg Organa bi bilo treba ustanoviti tudi Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ), Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine) in Skupni odbor Evropskih nadzornih organov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Skupni odbor).
A European Systemic Risk Board (hereinafter the ESRB’) should form part of the ESFS for the purposes of the tasks as specified in this Regulation and in Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [12].
Evropski odbor za sistemska tveganja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESRB) bi moral biti del ESFS za namene izvajanja nalog iz te uredbe in Uredbe (EU) št. 1092/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12].
The European Supervisory Authorities (hereinafter collectively referred to as the ‘ESAs’) should replace the Committee of European Banking Supervisors established by Commission Decision 2009/78/EC [13], the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors established by Commission Decision 2009/79/EC [14] and the Committee of European Securities Regulators established by Commission Decision 2009/77/EC [15], and should assume all of the tasks and competences of those committees including the continuation of ongoing work and projects, where appropriate.
Evropski nadzorni organi (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj: ESA) bi morali nadomestiti Odbor evropskih bančnih nadzornikov, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije 2009/78/ES [13], Odbor evropskih nadzornikov za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije 2009/79/ES [14], in Odbor evropskih zakonodajalcev za vrednostne papirje, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije 2009/77/ES [15], ter bi morali prevzeti vse naloge in pristojnosti navedenih odborov, vključno z nadaljevanjem tekočega dela in projektov, kjer je to primerno.
The Authority should act with a view to improving the functioning of the internal market, in particular by ensuring a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision taking account of the varying interests of all Member States and the different nature of financial market participants.
Organ bi moral delovati z namenom prispevati k izboljšanju delovanja notranjega trga, zlasti z zagotavljanjem visoke, učinkovite in skladne stopnje regulacije in nadzora ob upoštevanju različnih interesov vseh držav članic in različne narave udeležencev na finančnem trgu.
The Authority should protect public values such as the integrity and stability of the financial system, the transparency of markets and financial products and the protection of investors.
Organ bi moral varovati javne vrednote, kot so integriteta in stabilnost finančnega sistema, preglednost trgov in finančnih produktov ter zaščita vlagateljev.
Its tasks should also include promoting supervisory convergence and providing advice to the Union institutions in the areas of its responsibility.
Njegove naloge bi morale vključevati tudi spodbujanje konvergence nadzora in svetovanje institucijam Unije na področjih njegove pristojnosti.
If required to make such temporary prohibition in the case of an emergency situation, the Authority should do so in accordance with and under the conditions laid down in this Regulation.
Če se zahteva takšna začasna prepoved v izrednih razmerah, bi moral Organ to storiti v skladno s to uredbo in pod njenimi pogoji.
In cases where a temporary prohibition or restriction of certain financial activities has a cross-sectoral impact, sectoral legislation should provide that the Authority should consult and coordinate its action with, where relevant, the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority), through the Joint Committee.
V primerih, ko ima začasna prepoved ali omejitev nekaterih finančnih dejavnosti medsektorski učinek, bi morala sektorska zakonodaja določati, naj se Organ po potrebi o svojih ukrepih prek Skupnega odbora posvetuje ter jih usklajuje z Evropskim nadzornim organom (Evropski bančni organ) ter Evropskim nadzornim organom (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine).
The Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 2 May 2006 in Case C-217/04 (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. European Parliament and Council of the European Union) held that: ‘nothing in the wording of Article 95 EC [now Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)] implies that the addressees of the measures adopted by the Community legislature on the basis of that provision can only be the individual Member States.
Sodišče Evropske unije je v sodbi z dne 2. maja 2006 v zadevi C-217/04 (Združeno kraljestvo Velike Britanije in Severne Irske proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu Evropske unije) razsodilo: „iz ničesar v besedilu člena 95 ES [zdaj člen 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU)] se ne da sklepati, da bi morali biti ukrepi, ki jih je sprejel zakonodajalec Skupnosti na podlagi te določbe, naslovljeni samo na državo članico.
The legislature may deem it necessary to provide for the establishment of a Community body responsible for contributing to the implementation of a process of harmonisation in situations where, in order to facilitate the uniform implementation and application of acts based on that provision, the adoption of non-binding supporting and framework measures seems appropriate’ [16].
Lahko se namreč izkaže, da je, po presoji tega zakonodajalca, nujno ustanoviti organ Skupnosti, katerega naloga je prispevati k uresničitvi postopka usklajevanja v položajih, v katerih se kot primerno kaže sprejetje neobvezujočih spremljevalnih in okvirnih ukrepov zaradi olajševanja enotnega izvajanja in uporabe predpisov, ki temeljijo na tej določbi“ [16].
Existing Union legislation regulating the field covered by this Regulation also includes Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate [27], Directive 98/78/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on the supplementary supervision of insurance undertakings in an insurance group [28], Regulation (EC) No 1781/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 on information on the payer accompanying transfers of funds [29], and the relevant parts of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing [30] and of Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services [31].
Obstoječa zakonodaja Unije, ki ureja področje, zajeto v tej uredbi, vključuje tudi Direktivo 2002/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2002 o dopolnilnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij, zavarovalnic in investicijskih družb v finančnem konglomeratu [27], Direktivo 98/78/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 1998 o dopolnilnem nadzoru nad zavarovalnicami v zavarovalniški skupini [28] Uredbo (ES) št. 1781/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. novembra 2006 o podatkih o plačniku, ki spremljajo prenose denarnih sredstev [29], ter ustrezne dele Direktive 2005/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma [30] in Direktive 2002/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. septembra 2002 o trženju finančnih storitev potrošnikom na daljavo [31].
It is desirable that the Authority promote a consistent approach in the area of investor compensation schemes to ensure a level playing field and the equitable treatment of investors across the Union.
Zaželeno je, da Organ spodbuja usklajen pristop na področju odškodninske sheme za vlagatelje za zagotovitev enakih konkurenčnih pogojev in enakovredne obravnave vlagateljev po vsej Uniji.
As investor compensation schemes are subject to oversight in their Member States rather than regulatory supervision, the Authority should be able to exercise its powers under this Regulation in relation to the investor compensation scheme itself and its operator.
Ker so odškodninske sheme za vlagatelje predmet upravnega nadzora v njihovih državah članicah in ne regulativnega nadzora, bi moral biti Organ sposoben uresničevati svoja pooblastila na podlagi te uredbe v zvezi s odškodninsko shemo za vlagatelje in njenim upravljavcem.
There is a need to introduce an effective instrument to establish harmonised regulatory technical standards in financial services to ensure, also through a single rulebook, a level playing field and adequate protection of investors and consumers across the Union.
Treba je uvesti učinkovit instrument za določitev usklajenih regulativnih tehničnih standardov na področju finančnih storitev, da se zagotovijo, tudi prek enotnih pravil, enaki konkurenčni pogoji ter ustrezna zaščita vlagateljev in potrošnikov po vsej Uniji.
Ensuring the correct and full application of Union law is a core prerequisite for the integrity, transparency, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, the stability of the financial system, and for neutral conditions of competition for financial market participants in the Union.
Zagotavljanje pravilne in celovite uporabe prava Unije je osnovni pogoj za integriteto, preglednost, učinkovitost in pravilno delovanje finančnih trgov, stabilnost finančnega sistema in nevtralne konkurenčne pogoje za udeležence na finančnem trgu v Uniji.
Third, to overcome exceptional situations of persistent inaction by the competent authority concerned, the Authority should be empowered, as a last resort, to adopt decisions addressed to individual financial market participants.
Na tretji stopnji bi bilo treba za obvladovanje izjemnih primerov, ko zadevni pristojni organ dolgo časa ne ukrepa, Organu dodeliti pooblastila, da v skrajnem primeru sprejme odločitve, naslovljene na posamezne udeležence na finančnem trgu.
That power should be limited to exceptional circumstances in which a competent authority does not comply with the formal opinion addressed to it and in which Union law is directly applicable to financial market participants by virtue of existing or future Union regulations.
To pooblastilo bi bilo treba omejiti na izjemne okoliščine, v katerih pristojni organ ne ravna v skladu z uradnim mnenjem, ki je naslovljeno nanj, in v katerih se pravo Unije zaradi obstoječih ali prihodnjih uredb Unije neposredno uporablja za udeležence na finančnem trgu.
If a competent authority does not comply with the settlement decision addressed to it, the Authority should be empowered to adopt decisions directly addressed to financial market participants in areas of Union law directly applicable to them.
Če pristojni organ ne ravna v skladu z odločitvijo glede rešitve spora, ki je naslovljena nanj, bi bilo treba Organu dodeliti pooblastila, da sprejme odločitve, neposredno naslovljene na udeležence na finančnem trgu, na tistih področjih, kjer se pravo Unije zanje neposredno uporablja.
Colleges of supervisors play an important role in the efficient, effective and consistent supervision of financial market participants operating across borders.
Kolegiji nadzornikov imajo pomembno vlogo pri učinkovitem, uspešnem in doslednem nadzoru nad udeleženci na finančnem trgu, ki delujejo čezmejno.
In the areas of its competence, the Authority should contribute to, and participate actively in the development and coordination of effective and consistent recovery and resolution plans, procedures in emergency situations and preventive measures to ensure the internalisation of costs by the financial system, in order to minimise the systemic impact of any failure and the reliance on taxpayer funds to bail out financial market participants.
Organ bi moral na področjih svojih pristojnosti prispevati k oblikovanju in usklajevanju uspešnih in doslednih načrtov za reševanje in sanacijo, postopkov za izredne razmere in preventivnih ukrepov, s čimer bi zagotovil, da bi finančni sistem internaliziral stroške ter da bi se zmanjšal sistemski vpliv vsakega propada in odvisnost od davkoplačevalskih sredstev za reševanje udeležencev na finančnem trgu.
It should contribute to developing methods for the resolution of failing key financial market participants in ways which avoid contagion, which allow them to be wound down in an orderly and timely manner, and which, where applicable, include coherent and credible funding mechanisms as appropriate.
Prispevati bi moral k oblikovanju metod za sanacijo propadajočih udeležencev na finančnem trgu, tako da se prepreči njihov škodljivi vpliv in da se omogoči njihovo ustrezno in pravočasno prenehanje delovanja, vključno z doslednimi in verodostojnimi mehanizmi financiranja, kadar je to potrebno, ter pri vsem tem dejavno sodelovati.
In the current review of Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes [32] and Directive 97/9/EC, the Commission’s intention to pay special attention to the need to ensure further harmonisation throughout the Union is noted.
V trenutnem pregledu Direktive 94/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 1994 o sistemih zajamčenih vlog [32] in Direktive 97/9/ES je opazna namera Komisije, da še posebno pozornost nameni potrebi po zagotavljanju nadaljnjega usklajevanja po vsej Uniji.
The delegation of tasks and responsibilities can be a useful instrument in the functioning of the network of supervisors in order to reduce the duplication of supervisory tasks, to foster cooperation and thereby streamline the supervisory process, as well as to reduce the burden imposed on financial market participants.
Prenos nalog in odgovornosti je lahko uporaben instrument za delovanje mreže nadzornikov, da se zmanjša podvajanje nadzornih nalog, okrepi sodelovanje ter s tem racionalizira nadzorni postopek, ter da se zmanjša obremenitev udeležencev na finančnem trgu.
Whilst respecting the general rule that delegation should be allowed, Member States should be able to introduce specific conditions for the delegation of responsibilities, for example regarding information about, and the notification of, delegation arrangements.
Ob upoštevanju splošnega pravila, da bi moral biti prenos dovoljen, bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti, da uvedejo posebne pogoje za prenos pristojnosti, kot npr. v zvezi z informacijami in uradnim obveščanjem o ureditvah za prenos.
Reviews should focus not only on the convergence of supervisory practices but also on the capacity of supervisors to achieve high quality supervisory outcomes as well as on the independence of those competent authorities.
Pregledi ne bi smeli biti osredotočeni le na približevanje nadzornih praks, ampak tudi na sposobnost nadzornikov, da pri nadzoru dosežejo visoko kakovost rezultatov, kot tudi neodvisnost teh pristojnih organov.