natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, the Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, may authorise, by decision, the exemption of imports from companies which do not circumvent the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 91/2009, from the duty extended by Article 1.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom s sklepom odobri izvzetje uvoza iz družb, ki se ne izogibajo protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo (ES) št. 91/2009, iz dajatve, razširjene s členom 1 te uredbe.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 966/2010.
Carinskim organom se odredi, naj ustavijo registracijo uvoza, ki je bila določena v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 966/2010.
OJ L 282, 28.10.2010, p. 29.
UL L 282, 28.10.2010, str. 29.
the following declaration: ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (volume) of (product concerned) sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in (country concerned). I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’;
Naslednja izjava: „Podpisani potrjujem, da je (količina) (zadevnega izdelka), prodanega za izvoz v Evropsko unijo, ki jo zajema ta trgovinski račun, proizvedla (ime in naslov družbe) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) v (zadevna država). Izjavljam, da so podatki na tem trgovinskem računu popolni in resnični.“
date and signature.
Datum in podpis.
On the other hand, total imports of the product under investigation from Malaysia to the Union increased significantly in 2009 and 2010.
Po drugi strani pa se je v letih 2009 in 2010 znatno povečal skupni uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz Malezije v Unijo.
Both Comext data and the export data provided by the cooperating companies show that exports from Malaysia to the Union increased in those years whereas they were stable in previous years.
Tako podatki COMEXT kot izvozni podatki sodelujočih družb kažejo, da se je v navedenih letih povečal izvoz iz Malezije v Unijo, medtem ko se v letih pred tem ni spreminjal.
The evolution of the total production volume of cooperating producers in Malaysia had remained relatively stable prior to the imposition of measures in 2009.
Razvoj celotnega obsega proizvodnje sodelujočih proizvajalcev v Maleziji je pred uvedbo ukrepov v letu 2009 ostal razmeroma stabilen.
Malaysian producers however have increased their output since then considerably.
Malezijski proizvajalci pa so svojo proizvodnjo od takrat znatno povečali.
Two companies were found not to export the product during the IP and no conclusions could be drawn as to the nature of their operations.
Za dve družbi je bilo ugotovljeno, da izdelka v OP nista izvažali, zato ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti narave njunega delovanja.
Therefore, an exemption to these companies can not be granted at this stage.
Zato navedenima družbama na tej ravni ni bilo mogoče odobriti izvzetja.
In the start-up phase the company produced some fasteners from semi-finished products that were shipped from its Chinese parent company for completion.
V začetni fazi je družba proizvajala nekatere pritrdilne elemente iz polizdelkov, ki jih je za namene dokončanja pošiljala iz svoje kitajske matične družbe.
At a later stage, but still in the IP, when more machinery was transferred, fasteners were mainly produced from the raw material steel wire rod, also shipped from its Chinese parent company.
V poznejši fazi, vendar še vedno v OP, ko je bilo prenesenih več strojev, so bili pritrdilni elementi večinoma proizvedeni iz surovine jeklenih žičnatih palic, ki jih je poslala njena kitajska matična družba.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 724/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 724/2011
amending Regulation (EU) No 468/2010 establishing the EU list of vessels engaged in illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 468/2010 o oblikovanju seznama EU plovil, ki opravljajo nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1936/2001 and (EC) No 601/2004 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1093/94 and (EC) No 1447/1999 [1], in particular Article 30 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1005/2008 z dne 29. septembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje in o spremembi uredb (EGS) št. 2847/93, (ES) št. 1936/2001 in (ES) št. 601/2004 ter o razveljavitvi uredb (ES) št. 1093/94 in (ES) št. 1447/1999 [1] ter zlasti člena 30 Uredbe,
Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 lays down procedures for the identification of fishing vessels engaged in illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU fishing vessels) as well as procedures for establishing a European Union list of such vessels.
V poglavju V Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008 so določeni postopki za opredelitev ribiških plovil, ki opravljajo nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ribiška plovila IUU), ter postopki za oblikovanje seznama EU takih plovil.
The Union list of IUU fishing vessels is set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 468/2010 [2].
Seznam Unije ribiških plovil IUU je določen v Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 468/2010 [2].
According to Article 30(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, the Union list should comprise fishing vessels included in the IUU vessel lists adopted by regional fisheries management organisations.
Seznam Unije mora v skladu s členom 30(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008 vključevati tudi ribiška plovila s seznamov plovil IUU, ki so jih sprejele regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva (regional fisheries management organisations – RFMO).
According to Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, upon the receipt from regional fisheries management organisations of the lists of fishing vessels presumed or confirmed to be involved in IUU fishing, the Commission shall update the Union list.
Komisija v skladu s členom 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008 posodobi seznam Unije, potem ko od regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva prejme sezname ribiških plovil, ki so domnevno ali dokazano vpletena v ribolov IUU.
The Commission has received the updated lists from the annual meetings of the regional fisheries management organisations.
Komisija je z letnih zasedanj regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva prejela posodobljene sezname.
Considering that the same vessel might be listed under different names and/or flags depending on the time of its inclusion on the regional fisheries management organisations lists, the updated Union list should include the different names and/or flags as established by the respective regional fisheries management organisations.
Glede na to, da je lahko isto plovilo navedeno pod različnimi imeni in/ali zastavami, odvisno od časa, ko je bilo vključeno na seznam regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva, mora posodobljeni seznam Unije vsebovati različna imena in/ali zastave, kot so jih ugotovile ustrezne regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva.
Regulation (EU) No 468/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (EU) št. 468/2010 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo –
Part B of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 468/2010 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Del B Priloge k Uredbi (EU) št. 468/2010 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
OJ L 131, 29.5.2010, p. 22.
UL L 131, 29.5.2010, str. 22.
IMO [1] ship identification number/RFMO reference
Identifikacijska številka ladje IMO [1]/referenca regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribolova
Flag State [RFMO] [2]
Država zastave [RFMO] [2]
Panama (previous flag: St Kitts and Nevis)
Panama (prejšnja država zastave: St. Kitts in Nevis)
Unknown [IATTC]/Indonesia [ICCAT]
neznana [IATTC] / Indonezija [ICCAT]
Unknown (latest known flags: Togo, Equatorial Guinea) [CCAMLR]/Togo [SEAFO]
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Togo, Ekvatorialna Gvineja) [CCAMLR] / Togo [SEAFO]
Panama (previous flags: Equatorial Guinea, UK)
Panama (prejšnji državi zastave: Ekvatorialna Gvineja, Združeno kraljestvo)
Mongolia (previous flag: Togo) [CCAMLR]/Togo [SEAFO]
Indonezija (prejšnja država zastave: Togo) [CCAMLR] / Togo [SEAFO]
Unknown (latest known flags: Togo, North Korea) [CCAMLR]/Togo [SEAFO]
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Togo, Severna Koreja) [CCAMLR] / Togo [SEAFO]
Unknown (latest known flags: Equatorial Guinea, South Africa) [CCAMLR]/Equatorial Guinea [SEAFO]
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Ekvatorialna Gvineja, Južna Afrika) [CCAMLR] / Ekvatorialna Gvineja [SEAFO]
Guinea Republic
Gvineja
Russia (previous flag: Georgia) [NAFO]/Russia [SEAFO]/no flag indicated (NEAFC)
Rusija (prejšnja država zastave: Gruzija) [NAFO] / Rusija [SEAFO] / brez navedbe zastave (NEAFC)
Panama (previous flag: Seychelles)
Panama (prejšnja država zastave: Sejšeli
Unknown (latest known flags: Libya, Isle of Man)
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Libija, otok Man)
Unknown [IATTC]/Unknown (latest known flags: Belize, Costa Rica) [ICCAT]
neznana [IATTC] / neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Belize, Kostarika) [ICCAT]
Nigeria (previous flag: Belize)
Nigerija (prejšnja država zastave: Belize)
Unknown (latest known flags: Sierra Leone, Panama) [NAFO]/Unknown [NEAFC]/Sierra Leone (latest known flag: Panama) [SEAFO]
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Sierra Leone, Panama) [NAFO] / neznana [NEAFC] / Sierra Leone (zadnja znana država zastave: Panama) [SEAFO]
Unknown (latest known flag: Malaysia) [IOTC]/Malaysia [ICCAT]
neznana (zadnja znana država zastave: Malezija) [IOTC] / Malezija [ICCAT]
Panama [NAFO]/Unknown [NEAFC]/Unknown (latest known flag: Panama) [SEAFO]
Panama [NAFO] / neznana [NEAFC] / neznana (zadnja znana država zastave: Panama) [SEAFO]
JINN FENG TSAIR No 1
JINN FENG TSAIR 1
Mongolia (previous flags: Togo, Seychelles) [CCAMLR]/Togo [SEAFO]
Mongolija (prejšnji državi zastave: Togo, Sejšeli) [CCAMLR] / Togo [SEAFO]
Mongolia (previous flags: Togo, Sierra Leone) [CCAMLR]/Unknown (latest known flags: Togo, Sierra Leone) [SEAFO]
Mongolija (prejšnji državi zastave: Togo, Sierra Leone) [CCAMLR] / neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Togo, Sierra Leone) [SEAFO]
Unknown (latest known flags: Togo, Ghana)
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Togo, Gana)
Guinea Conakry
Gvineja Conakry
Unknown (latest known flag: Togo)
neznana (zadnja znana država zastave: Togo)
China (previous flags: Georgia, Russia)
Kitajska (prejšnji državi zastave: Gruzija, Rusija)
Indonesia [IATTC]/Unknown (latest known flag: Indonesia) [ICCAT]
Indonezija [IATTC] / neznana (zadnja znana država zastave: Indonezija) [ICCAT]
Indonesia [IATTC]/Unknown [ICCAT]
Indonezija [IATTC] / neznana [ICCAT]
Panama (previous flag: Guinea Conakry)
Panama (prejšnja država zastave: Gvineja Conakry)
Unknown (latest known flags: Togo, Seychelles) [CCAMLR]/Togo [SEAFO]
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Togo, Sejšeli) [CCAMLR] / Togo [SEAFO]
Oman (previous flag: St Kitts)
Oman (prejšnja država zastave: St. Kitts)
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea [CCAMLR]/Panama [SEAFO]
Severna Koreja [CCAMLR] / Panama [SEAFO]
Unknown (latest known flags: Libya, UK)
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Libija, Združeno kraljestvo)
Unknown (latest known flag: St Vincent and Grenadines)
neznana (zadnja znana država zastave: Saint Vincent in Grenadine)
13568 (IATTC)/20090007 (ICCAT)
13568 (IATTC) / 20090007 (ICCAT)
Unknown (latest known flags: Panama, Belize)
neznana (zadnji znani državi zastave: Panama, Belize)
Cambodia (previous flags: Namibia, Uruguay) [CCAMLR]/Unknown [SEAFO]
Kambodža (prejšnji državi zastave: Namibija, Urugvaj) [CCAMLR] / neznana [SEAFO]
129 (IATTC)/200800029 (ICCAT)
129 (IATTC) / 200800029 (ICCAT)
Panama (previous flag: Morocco)
Panama (prejšnja država zastave: Maroko)
International Maritime Organisation.
Mednarodna pomorska organizacija (International Maritime Organisation – IMO).
For any additional information consult the websites of the RFMOs.’
Dodatne informacije so na voljo na spletnih straneh regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribolova.“
CARIBBEAN STAR No. 31
CARIBBEAN STAR 31
TCHING YE No. 6
TCHING YE 6
WEN TENG No. 688
WEN TENG 688
FU LIEN No. 1
FU LIEN 1
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 725/2011
establishing a procedure for the approval and certification of innovative technologies for reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi postopka za odobritev in certificiranje inovativnih tehnologij za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles [1], and in particular Article 12(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o določitvi standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nove osebne avtomobile kot del celostnega pristopa Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih tovornih vozil [1] in zlasti člena 12(2) Uredbe,
In order to promote the development and the early uptake of new and advanced CO2 emission-reducing vehicle technologies, Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 provides manufacturers and suppliers with the possibility of applying for the approval of certain innovative technologies contributing to reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars.
Da bi se spodbudila razvoj ter hitro uvajanje novih in naprednih tehnologij za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 pri vozilih, Uredba (ES) št. 443/2009 proizvajalcem in dobaviteljem omogoča, da zaprosijo za odobritev nekaterih inovativnih tehnologij, ki prispevajo k zmanjšanju emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil.
Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the criteria for determining which technologies should be eligible as eco-innovations pursuant to that Regulation.
Zato je treba pojasniti merila, na podlagi katerih se določa, katere tehnologije se v skladu z navedeno uredbo štejejo za upravičene kot ekološke inovacije.
According to point (c) of Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, technologies that are part of the Union’s integrated approach outlined in the Commission Communication of 7 February 2007 entitled ‘Results of the review of the Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles’ [2] and the Commission Communication of 7 February 2007 entitled ‘A Competitive Automotive Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century’ [3], and have been regulated in Union law, or other technologies that are mandatory under Union law, are not eligible as eco-innovations under that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 12(2)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 se tehnologije, ki so del celostnega pristopa Unije iz sporočila Komisije z dne 7. februarja 2007 z naslovom Rezultati pregleda strategije Skupnosti za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil in lahkih tovornih vozil [2] ter sporočila Komisije z dne 7. februarja 2007 z naslovom Konkurenčni ureditveni okvir za avtomobilsko industrijo v 21. stoletju [3] ter so že urejene s pravom Unije, ali druge tehnologije, ki so obvezne v skladu s pravom Unije, ne štejejo za upravičene kot ekološke inovacije.
These technologies include tyre pressure monitoring systems, tyre rolling resistance and gear shift indicators falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefore [4] and, as regards tyre rolling resistance, Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters [5].
Te tehnologije vključujejo sisteme za nadzor tlaka v pnevmatikah, kotalni upor pnevmatik in kazalnike menjanja prestav, ki spadajo na področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o zahtevah za homologacijo za splošno varnost motornih vozil, njihovih priklopnikov ter sistemov, sestavnih delov in samostojnih tehničnih enot, namenjenih za taka vozila [4], ter v zvezi s kotalnim uporom pnevmatik Uredbe (ES) št. 1222/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o označevanju pnevmatik glede na izkoristek goriva in druge bistvene parametre [5].
A technology that has already for some time been widely available on the market cannot be considered innovative within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and should not be eligible as an eco-innovation.
Tehnologija, ki je že nekaj časa splošno dostopna na trgu, se ne more šteti za inovativno v smislu člena 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 in se ne šteje za upravičeno kot ekološka inovacija.
In order to create the right incentives, it is appropriate to limit the level of market penetration of a technology to that of the niche segment as defined in Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and to use the year 2009 as a baseline.
Da bi se oblikovale ustrezne spodbude, je primerno omejiti stopnjo uveljavitve tehnologije na trgu na stopnjo, ki jo ima ozko specializiran segment iz člena 11(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009, in za izhodišče uporabiti leto 2009.
Those thresholds should be subject to review at the latest in 2015.
Te mejne vrednosti je treba pregledati najpozneje leta 2015.
In order to promote technologies with the highest potential for reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars, and in particular the development of innovative propulsion technologies, only those technologies should be eligible that are intrinsic to the transport function of the vehicle and contribute significantly to improving the overall energy consumption of the vehicle.
Da bi se spodbujale tehnologije z največjim potencialom za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil in zlasti razvoj inovativnih pogonskih tehnologij, se morajo šteti za upravičene le tehnologije, ki so tesno povezane s prometno funkcijo vozila in ki znatno prispevajo k izboljšanju celotne porabe energije vozila.
Technologies that are accessory to that purpose or aim at enhancing the comfort of the driver or the passengers should not be eligible.
Tehnologije, ki ta namen dopolnjujejo, ali katerih cilj je izboljšanje udobja voznika ali potnikov, se ne smejo šteti kot upravičene.
According to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, applications may be submitted by both manufacturers and suppliers.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 lahko prošnjo vložijo proizvajalci in dobavitelji.
The application should include the necessary evidence that the eligibility criteria are fully met, including a methodology for measuring the CO2 savings from the innovative technology.
Prošnja mora vključevati potrebna dokazila, da so merila za upravičenost v celoti izpolnjena, vključno z metodologijo za merjenje prihrankov CO2 zaradi inovativne tehnologije.
It should be possible to measure the CO2 savings from an eco-innovation with a satisfactory degree of accuracy.
Prihranki CO2 zaradi ekološke inovacije morajo biti merljivi, pri čemer je potrebna zadostna stopnja točnosti.
That accuracy can only be achieved where the savings are 1 g CO2/km or more.
To točnost je mogoče doseči le, če je prihranek 1 g CO2/km ali več.
Where the CO2 savings of a technology depends on the behaviour of the driver or on other factors that are outside the control of the applicant, that technology should in principle not be eligible as an eco-innovation, unless it is possible, on the basis of strong and independent statistical evidence, to make verifiable assumptions about average driver behaviour.
Če so prihranki CO2 pri posamezni tehnologiji odvisni od obnašanja voznika ali drugih dejavnikov, ki so zunaj nadzora vlagatelja, se ta tehnologija načeloma ne šteje za upravičeno kot ekološka inovacija, razen če je mogoče na podlagi tehtnih in neodvisnih statističnih dokazov preverljivo predvideti obnašanje povprečnega voznika.
The standard test cycle used for type approval measurement of the CO2 emissions from a vehicle does not demonstrate all savings that can be attributed to certain technologies.
S standardnim poskusnim ciklom, ki se uporablja za merjenje emisij CO2 iz vozil pri homologacijah, se ne prikažejo vsi prihranki, ki jih je mogoče doseči z nekaterimi tehnologijami.
To create the right incentives for innovation, only those savings that are not captured by the standard test cycle should be taken into account for the calculation of the total CO2 savings.
Da bi se oblikovale pravilne spodbude za inovacije, je treba pri izračunu skupnega prihranka CO2 upoštevati le prihranke, ki niso zajeti v standardnem poskusnem ciklu.
In demonstrating the CO2 savings, a comparison should be made between the same vehicles with and without the eco-innovation.
Pri prikazu prihranka CO2 je treba med seboj primerjati enaka vozila z ekološko inovacijo in brez nje.
The testing methodology should provide verifiable, repeatable and comparable measurements.
Metodologija preskušanja mora vključevati zanesljive, ponovljive in primerljive meritve.
In order to ensure a level playing field and, in the absence of an agreed and more realistic driving cycle, the driving patterns in the New European Driving Cycle as referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 of 18 July 2008 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information [6] should be used as a common reference.
Da bi se zagotovili enaki konkurenčni pogoji ter ker ni na voljo dogovorjenega in bolj realnega voznega cikla, je treba kot skupno referenco uporabiti vozne vzorce iz novega evropskega voznega cikla v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 692/2008 z dne 18. julija 2008 o izvajanju in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 715/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o homologaciji motornih vozil glede na emisije iz lahkih potniških in gospodarskih vozil (Euro 5 in Euro 6) in o dostopu do informacij o popravilu in vzdrževanju vozil [6].
The testing methodology should be based on measurements on a chassis dynamometer or on modelling or simulation where such methodologies would provide better and more accurate results.
Metodologija preskušanja mora temeljiti na meritvah z dinamometrom ali na modeliranju ali simulaciji, kadar bi takšni metodologiji zagotovili boljše in natančnejše rezultate.
Guidelines on the preparation of the application and the testing methodologies should be provided by the Commission and be regularly updated to take into account the experience gained from assessing different applications.
Komisija mora zagotoviti smernice za pripravo prošnje in metodologij preskušanja, pri čemer jih mora redno posodabljati, da se bodo v njih upoštevale izkušnje, pridobljene z ocenjevanjem različnih prošenj.
According to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009, the application must be accompanied by a verification report provided by an independent and certified body.
Prošnji je treba v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 priložiti poročilo o preverjanju, ki ga zagotovi neodvisni in priglašeni organ.