natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The above provisions ensure that appropriate enforcement mechanisms are in place in Japan in order to guarantee the protection of the personal data which maybe transferred by the Commission for the purpose of identifying European economic operators with regard to their recognition as authorised economic operators in Japan.
Z zgornjimi določbami se zagotavlja, da na Japonskem veljajo ustrezni mehanizmi uveljavljanja varstva osebnih podatkov, ki jih lahko posreduje Komisija za namene identifikacije evropskih gospodarskih subjektov v zvezi z njihovim priznavanjem za pooblaščene gospodarske subjekte na Japonskem.
In the light of all the circumstances surrounding the set of the specific data transfer operations to be performed by the Commission in implementing JCCC Decision No 1/2010, the nature of the data, the purpose and duration of the proposed processing operation or operations, the rules of law, both general and sectoral, in force in Japan and the professional rules and security measures which are complied with in Japan, the level of protection provided in Japan for the transfer of personal data from the competent services of the Commission to the Japanese Ministry of Finance in implementing JCCC Decision No 1/2010 is considered to be of an adequate level.
Zaradi vseh okoliščin, ki spremljajo različne postopke posebnega posredovanja podatkov, ki jih Komisija izvede v okviru izvajanja Sklepa SOCS št. 1/2010, zaradi narave podatkov, namena in trajanja predlaganih postopkov obdelave, splošnih in sektorskih pravnih predpisov, ki veljajo na Japonskem, ter strokovnih predpisov in varnostnih ukrepov na Japonskem se šteje, da je stopnja zaščite, ki se na Japonskem zagotavlja, kadar pristojne službe Komisije v okviru izvajanja Sklepa SOCS št. 1/2010 posredujejo osebne podatke japonskemu ministrstvu za finance, ustrezna.
This Decision should be limited to the specific situation referred to in JCCC Decision No 1/2010 as the assessment of Japanese data protection legal framework was based on the limited categories of data to be transferred, on the limited purpose for processing and on the limited duration of use of such data.
Ta sklep mora biti omejen na posebne okoliščine iz Sklepa SOCS št. 1/2010, ker je ocena japonskega pravnega okvira za zaščito podatkov temeljila na omejenih kategorijah podatkov za posredovanje, omejenih namenih obdelave in omejenem trajanju uporabe takšnih podatkov.
Therefore this Decision is limited to the protection afforded to personal data transferred from the EU to Japan by the European Commission under the abovementioned JCCC Decision in view of the specific purpose and circumstances of their processing in Japan.
Zato je ta sklep zaradi posebnega namena in okoliščin obdelave takšnih podatkov na Japonskem omejen na zaščito osebnih podatkov iz Evropske unije, ki jih Evropska komisija v okviru navedenega sklepa SOCS posreduje Japonski.
This Decision is without prejudice to findings of the Commission in application of Article 25(4) and (6) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [4],
Ta sklep ne posega v ugotovitve Komisije pri uporabi člena 25(4) in (6) Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [4] –
An adequate level of protection is offered by Japan to personal data transferred from the European Union by the European Commission to Japan in view of the mutual recognition of authorised economic operator programmes pursuant to JCCC Decision No 1/2010 for the purpose of implementation of JCCC Decision No 1/2010 in accordance with Article 9(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Japonska zagotavlja primerno raven zaščite osebnih podatkov iz Evropske unije, ki jih Evropska komisija posreduje Japonski zaradi medsebojnega priznavanja programov o pooblaščenih gospodarskih subjektih na podlagi Sklepa Skupnega odbora za carinsko sodelovanje št. 1/2010 za namene izvajanja navedenega sklepa v skladu s členom 9(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001.
OJ L 62, 6.3.2008, p. 24.
UL L 62, 6.3.2008, str. 24.
OJ L 279, 23.10.2010, p. 71.
UL L 279, 23.10.2010, str. 71.
The duration of the transfers is for the whole period of time for which the Japanese Ministry of Finance uses the information in order to grant to European economic operators benefits under the terms of JCCC Decision No 1/2010. The Commission will regularly transfer updated and modified data of European economic operators to the Japanese Ministry of Finance.
Osebni podatki za izmenjavo so našteti v točkah (a) do (f) oddelka IV(4) Sklepa SOCS št. 1/2010.
JCCC Decision No 1/2010 provides in Section IV for an exchange of information between customs authorities as defined in Article 1(c) of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Japan on cooperation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters. According to that definition, the Japanese Ministry of Finance and the competent services of the Commission are deemed to be a customs authority.
Sklep SOCS št. 1/2010 v oddelku IV predvideva izmenjavo informacij med carinskimi organi, kot so opredeljeni v členu 1(c) Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Vlado Japonske o sodelovanju in medsebojni upravni pomoči v carinskih zadevah.
Commission Implementing Decision
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije
amending Decision 2011/44/EU concerning certain protection measures against foot-and-mouth disease in Bulgaria
o spremembi Sklepa 2011/44/EU o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih proti slinavki in parkljevki v Bolgariji
A case of foot-and-mouth disease in wild boar and a number of outbreaks of that disease in livestock were confirmed in Bulgaria in January 2011.
(1) Januarja 2011 so bili v Bolgariji potrjeni primer slinavke in parkljevke pri divjem prašiču in številni izbruhi navedene bolezni pri rejnih živalih.
As a consequence, Bulgaria has taken measures in the framework of Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease [3].
Zato je Bolgarija sprejela ukrepe v okviru Direktive Sveta 2003/85/ES z dne 29. septembra 2003 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke [3].
In addition, Commission Decision 2011/44/EU of 19 January 2011 concerning certain protection measures against foot-and-mouth disease in Bulgaria [4] was adopted, as it was necessary to reinforce the control measures taken by Bulgaria.
Poleg tega je bil sprejet Sklep Komisije 2011/44/EU z dne 19. januarja 2011 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih proti slinavki in parkljevki v Bolgariji [4], saj je bilo nujno okrepiti nadzorne ukrepe, ki jih je sprejela Bolgarija.
That Decision is to apply until 31 March 2011.
Navedeni sklep se uporablja do 31. marca 2011.
On 19 March 2011, Bulgaria reported an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in beef cattle grazing in the municipality of Sredets, situated in the region of Burgas, west of the municipality of Malko Tarnovo where the last outbreak was reported on 31 January 2011.
Bolgarija je 19. marca 2011 prijavila izbruh slinavke in parkljevke pri govedu, ki se je paslo v občini Sredets v regiji Burgas, zahodno od občine Malko Tarnovo, kjer je bil 31. januarja 2011 prijavljen zadnji izbruh.
It is therefore necessary to prolong the measures laid down in Decision 2011/44/EU, until 30 June 2011.
Zato je treba uporabo ukrepov iz Sklepa 2011/44/EU podaljšati do 30. junija 2011.
Decision 2011/44/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Sklep 2011/44/EU je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Article 16 of Decision 2011/44/EU, the date ‘31 March 2011’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2011’.
V členu 16 Sklepa 2011/44/EU se datum „31. marca 2011“ nadomesti z datumom „30. junija 2011“.
OJ L 19, 22.1.2011, p. 20.
UL L 19, 22.1.2011, str. 20.
amending Article 136 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union with regard to a stability mechanism for Member States whose currency is the euro
o spremembi člena 136 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije glede mehanizma za stabilnost za države članice, katerih valuta je euro
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament [1],
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta, [1]
Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission [2],
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske komisije, [2]
After obtaining the opinion of the European Central Bank [3],
po pridobitvi mnenja Evropske centralne banke, [3]
Article 48(6) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) allows the European Council, acting by unanimity after consulting the European Parliament, the Commission and, in certain cases, the European Central Bank, to adopt a decision amending all or part of the provisions of Part Three of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Člen 48(6) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) omogoča, da lahko Evropski svet sprejme sklep o spremembi vseh ali nekaterih določb tretjega dela Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), pri čemer odloča soglasno po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom, s Komisijo in v nekaterih primerih z Evropsko centralno banko.
At the meeting of the European Council of 28 and 29 October 2010, the Heads of State or Government agreed on the need for Member States to establish a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area as a whole and invited the President of the European Council to undertake consultations with the members of the European Council on a limited treaty change required to that effect.
Voditelji držav ali vlad so se na srečanju Evropskega sveta 28. in 29. oktobra 2010 strinjali glede potrebe, da države članice vzpostavijo trajen krizni mehanizem za zaščito finančne stabilnosti euroobmočja kot celote, in pozvali predsednika Evropskega sveta, naj se s člani Evropskega sveta posvetuje o manjši spremembi Pogodbe, ki je potrebna za ta namen.
On 16 December 2010, the Belgian Government submitted, in accordance with Article 48(6), first subparagraph, of the TEU, a proposal for revising Article 136 of the TFEU by adding a paragraph under which the Member States whose currency is the euro may establish a stability mechanism to be activated if indispensable to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole and stating that the granting of any required financial assistance under the mechanism will be made subject to strict conditionality.
Belgijska vlada je 16. decembra 2010 v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 48(6) PEU predložila predlog za spremembo člena 136 PDEU, s katerim se doda odstavek, po katerem lahko države članice, katerih valuta je euro, vzpostavijo mehanizem za stabilnost, ki se sproži, kadar je to nujno potrebno za zaščito stabilnosti euroobmočja kot celote, in ki določa, da bodo za odobritev kakršne koli potrebne finančne pomoči v okviru mehanizma veljali strogi pogoji.
The stability mechanism will provide the necessary tool for dealing with such cases of risk to the financial stability of the euro area as a whole as have been experienced in 2010, and hence help preserve the economic and financial stability of the Union itself.
Mehanizem za stabilnost bo zagotovil potrebno orodje za soočanje s takšnimi primeri ogrozitve finančne stabilnosti euroobmočja kot celote, kakršnim smo bili priča v letu 2010, in tako pomagal ohranjati gospodarsko in finančno stabilnost same Unije.
On 16 December 2010, the European Council decided to consult, in accordance with Article 48(6), second subparagraph, of the TEU, the European Parliament and the Commission, on the proposal.
(5) Evropski svet je 16. decembra 2010 sklenil, da se bo v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 48(6) PEU o predlogu posvetoval z Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo.
The European Parliament [1] Opinion of 23 March 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Evropski parlament [1] Mnenje z dne 23. marca 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
, the Commission [2] Opinion of 15 February 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
, Komisija [2] Mnenje z dne 15. februarja 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
and the European Central Bank [3] Opinion of 17 March 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
in Evropska centralna banka [3] Mnenje z dne 17. marca 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
, respectively, adopted opinions on the proposal.
so sprejeli svoja mnenja o predlogu.
The amendment concerns a provision contained in Part Three of the TFEU and it does not increase the competences conferred on the Union in the Treaties,
Sprememba se nanaša na določbo iz tretjega dela PDEU in ne povečuje pristojnosti, ki so na Unijo prenesene s Pogodbama –
The granting of any required financial assistance under the mechanism will be made subject to strict conditionality.’.
Za odobritev potrebne finančne pomoči v okviru mehanizma bodo veljali strogi pogoji.“
Opinion of 23 March 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 23. marca 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Opinion of 15 February 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 15. februarja 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Opinion of 17 March 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 17. marca 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
on the signing of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cameroon on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT)
o podpisu Prostovoljnega sporazuma o partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Republiko Kamerun o izvrševanju zakonodaje, upravljanju in trgovanju na področju gozdov pri uvozu lesa in lesnih proizvodov v Evropsko unijo (FLEGT)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article 218(5), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 207 Pogodbe v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
In May 2003 the Commission adopted a Communication to the Council and the European Parliament entitled ‘Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT): Proposal for an EU Action Plan’ which called for measures to address illegal logging through the development of voluntary partnership agreements with timber-producing countries.
(1) Evropska komisija je maja 2003 sprejela sporočilo Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom „Izvrševanje zakonodaje, upravljanje in trgovanje na področju gozdov (FLEGT): predlog akcijskega načrta EU“, v katerem je pozvala, naj se z oblikovanjem prostovoljnih sporazumov o partnerstvu z državami proizvajalkami lesa pripravijo ukrepi za preprečevanje nezakonite sečnje.
Council conclusions on that Action Plan were adopted in October 2003 [1] and the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the subject on 11 July 2005 [2].
Sklepi Sveta o navedenem akcijskem načrtu so bili sprejeti oktobra 2003 [1], Evropski parlament pa je o tej vsebini sprejel resolucijo 11. julija 2005 [2].
On 5 December 2005, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations on partnership agreements to implement the Union Action Plan for FLEGT.
Svet je 5. decembra 2005 pooblastil Komisijo, da začne pogajanja o sporazumih o partnerstvu z namenom izvajanja akcijskega načrta Unije za FLEGT.
On 20 December 2005, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 [3] which established a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the Union from countries with which the Union has concluded voluntary partnership agreements.
Svet je 20. decembra 2005 sprejel Uredbo (ES) št. 2173/2005 [3], ki je uvedla shemo izdajanja dovoljenj FLEGT za uvoz lesa v Unijo iz držav, s katerimi je Unija sklenila prostovoljne sporazume o partnerstvu.
The negotiations with the Republic of Cameroon have been concluded and the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cameroon on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 6 May 2010.
Pogajanja z Republiko Kamerun so se zaključila in Prostovoljni sporazum o partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Republiko Kamerun o izvrševanju zakonodaje, upravljanju in trgovanju na področju gozdov pri uvozu lesa in lesnih proizvodov v Evropsko unijo (FLEGT) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) je bil parafiran 6. maja 2010.
The Agreement should be signed subject to its conclusion,
Sporazum bi bilo treba podpisati s pridržkom njegove sklenitve –
The signing of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cameroon on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT) is hereby authorised on behalf of the Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement.
Podpis Prostovoljnega sporazuma o partnerstvu med Evropsko unijo in Republiko Kamerun o izvrševanju zakonodaje, upravljanju in trgovanju na področju gozdov pri uvozu lesa in lesnih proizvodov v Evropsko unijo (FLEGT) se odobri v imenu Unije, s pridržkom sklenitve navedenega sporazuma.
The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision [4].
Besedilo Sporazuma je priloženo temu sklepu [4].
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo, pooblaščeno za podpis Sporazuma v imenu Unije s pridržkom njegove sklenitve.
OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p. 482.
UL C 157 E, 6.7.2006, str. 482.
Council Decision 2011/203/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2011/203/SZVP
amending Decision 2010/445/CFSP extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the crisis in Georgia
o spremembi Sklepa 2010/445/SZVP o podaljšanju mandata posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije za krizo v Gruziji
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 28, člena 31(2) in člena 33 Pogodbe,
On 25 September 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/760/CFSP [1] appointing Mr Pierre MOREL European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the crisis in Georgia until 28 February 2009.
Svet je 25. septembra 2008 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2008/760/SZVP [1], s katerim je imenoval g. Pierra MORELA za posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije (PPEU) za krizo v Gruziji do 28. februarja 2009.
Decision 2010/445/CFSP should be amended accordingly,
Sklep 2010/445/SZVP bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti –
In Article 5 of Decision 2010/445/CFSP, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
V členu 5 Sklepa 2010/445/SZVP se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure relating to the mandate of the EUSR during the period from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 shall be EUR 1004000.’.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z mandatom PPEU, za obdobje od 1. septembra 2010 do 31. avgusta 2011 znaša 1004000 EUR.“.
It shall apply from 1 March 2011.
Uporablja se od 1. marca 2011.
OJ L 211, 12.8.2010, p. 33.
UL L 211, 12.8.2010, str. 33.
On 11 August 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/445/CFSP [2] extending the mandate of the EUSR until 31 August 2011.
Svet je 11. avgusta 2010 sprejel Sklep 2010/445/SZVP [2], s katerim je bil mandat PPEU podaljšan do 31. avgusta 2011.
The financial reference amount provided for to cover the expenditure relating to the mandate of the EUSR until that date was set at EUR 700000. The financial reference amount should be increased to EUR 1004000 in order to allow for additional operational needs.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z mandatom PPEU, je do tega dne znašal 700000 EUR. Referenčni finančni znesek bi bilo treba povečati na 1004000 EUR, da bi lahko krili stroške, nastale zaradi dodatnih operativnih potreb.
on a financial contribution from the Union towards emergency measures to combat avian influenza in Denmark and the Netherlands in 2010
o finančnem prispevku Unije za nujne ukrepe za boj proti aviarni influenci na Danskem in Nizozemskem leta 2010
(Only the Danish and Dutch texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v danskem in nizozemskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
In the event of an outbreak of avian influenza, there is a risk that the disease agent spreads to other poultry holdings within that Member State, but also to other Member States and to third countries through trade in live poultry or their products.
Ob izbruhu aviarne influence obstaja tveganje, da se povzročitelj bolezni razširi na druga gospodarstva s perutnino v isti državi članici, vendar tudi na druge države članice ali tretje države zaradi trgovine z živo perutnino ali njenimi proizvodi.
Decision 2009/470/EC lays down the procedures governing the financial contribution from the Union towards specific veterinary measures, including emergency measures.
Odločba 2009/470/ES določa postopke, ki urejajo finančni prispevek Unije za posebne veterinarske ukrepe, vključno z nujnimi ukrepi.
Article 4(3), first and second indents of Decision 2009/470/EC lays down rules on the percentage of the costs incurred by the Member State that may be covered by the financial contribution from the Union.
Prva in druga alinea člena 4(3) Odločbe 2009/470/ES določata pravila o deležih stroškov, nastalih v državah članicah, ki jih lahko zajema finančni prispevek Unije.
The payment of a financial contribution from the Union towards emergency measures to eradicate avian influenza is subject to the rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 of 28 February 2005 laying down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC [3].
Za plačilo finančnega prispevka Unije za nujne ukrepe za izkoreninjenje aviarne influence veljajo pravila, določena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 z dne 28. februarja 2005 o določitvi pravil v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS [3].
The authorities of Denmark and the Netherlands were able to demonstrate through reports provided in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and continuous submission of information on the development of the disease situation that they have efficiently implemented the control measures provided for in Directive 2005/94/EC leading to the rapid containment of the disease.
Danski in nizozemski organi so s poročili Stalnemu odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter z rednim posredovanjem informacij o položaju glede bolezni dokazali, da so učinkovito izvajali ukrepe nadzora iz Direktive 2005/94/ES in tako hitro zajezili širjenje bolezni.
The authorities of Denmark and the Netherlands have therefore fulfilled all their technical and administrative obligations with regard to the measures provided for in Article 4(2) of Decision 2009/470/EC and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Tako so danski in nizozemski organi izpolnili vse svoje tehnične in upravne obveznosti v zvezi z ukrepi iz člena 4(2) Odločbe 2009/470/ES in člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
Financial contribution from the Union to Denmark and the Netherlands
Finančni prispevek Unije za Dansko in Nizozemsko
A financial contribution from the Union may be granted to Denmark and the Netherlands towards the costs incurred by these Member States in taking measures pursuant to Article 4(2) and (3) of Decision 2009/470/EC, to combat avian influenza in Denmark in March 2010 and in the Netherlands in May 2010.
Danski in Nizozemski se odobri finančni prispevek Unije za kritje stroškov, ki sta jih navedeni državi članici imeli zaradi sprejetja ukrepov v skladu s členom 4(2) in (3) Odločbe 2009/470/ES za boj proti aviarni influenci na Danskem marca 2010 in na Nizozemskem maja 2010.
The financial contribution mentioned in paragraph 1 shall be fixed in a subsequent decision to be adopted in accordance with the procedure established in Article 40(2) of Decision 2009/470/EC.
Finančni prispevek iz odstavka 1 se določi z naknadnim sklepom, ki bo sprejet v skladu s postopkom iz člena 40(2) Odločbe 2009/470/ES.