natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission officially informed the applicant, and the authorities of the exporting country and the Union industry, of the initiation of the partial interim review investigation.
Komisija je vložnika, organe države izvoznice in industrijo Unije uradno obvestila o začetku preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to be heard.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in biti zaslišane.
In order to obtain the information necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent a questionnaire to the applicant and received a reply within the deadline set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku poslala vprašalnik, da bi pridobila informacije, ki so potrebne za njeno preiskavo, ta pa ga je izpolnjenega vrnil v predpisanem roku.
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the determination of dumping.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev dampinga.
The product concerned by this review is the same as that defined in the Regulation imposing the measures in force (Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007), namely polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, originating in India, currently falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290.
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta pregled, je enak izdelek, kot ga opredeljuje uredba o uvedbi veljavni ukrepov (Uredba (ES) št. 1292/2007), in sicer folija iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290.
As in previous investigations, this investigation has shown that PET film produced in India and exported to the EU and the PET film produced and sold domestically on the Indian market, as well as the PET film produced and sold in the EU by the Union producers have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Ta preiskava je podobno kot prejšnje pokazala, da imajo folija iz PET, proizvedena v Indiji in izvožena v Unijo, folija iz PET, proizvedena in prodana na domačem indijskem trgu, ter folija iz PET, ki jo proizvedejo proizvajalci Unije in prodajo v EU, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe.
In order to establish normal value, it was first determined whether the total volume of domestic sales of the like product was representative in accordance of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, namely whether these sales represented 5 % of the sales volume of the product concerned exported to the EU.
Za določitev normalne vrednosti je bilo najprej ugotovljeno, ali je bil skupen obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka reprezentativen v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe, torej ali je ta prodaja predstavljala 5 % prodane količine zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega v EU.
The Commission established that the like product was sold domestically by the applicant in overall representative volumes.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je vložnik podobni izdelek prodajal na domačem trgu v reprezentativnem obsegu v celoti.
This representativity test was then carried out on a type-by-type basis.
Ta preskus reprezentativnosti je bil potem izveden za vsako posamezno vrsto.
It was found that two types were not sold domestically at all.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se dve vrsti sploh nista prodajali na domačem trgu.
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of the like product could be regarded as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali bi se domača prodaja podobnega izdelka lahko štela za prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing, for the like product sold on the Indian market, the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers during the RIP.
To je bilo izvedeno tako, da se je za podobni izdelek, ki se prodaja na indijskem trgu, določil delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam v OPP.
It was found that more than 90 % of the domestic sales were profitable.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bilo več kot 90 % domače prodaje dobičkonosne.
For the product types sold domestically and which passed the representativity test mentioned in recital 21 above, it was established that for one product type, all domestic transactions were not profitable and thus were not made in the ordinary course of trade in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za vrste izdelka, ki so bile prodane na domačem trgu in so opravile preskus reprezentativnosti, naveden v uvodni izjavi (21), je bilo ugotovljeno, da za eno vrsto izdelka nobena domača transakcija ni bila dobičkonosna ter tako ni bila izvedena v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
For the product types which were sold in sufficient quantities and sold in the ordinary course of trade in India, normal value was established on the basis of prices paid or payable by unrelated customers pursuant to Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Za vrste izdelka, ki so bile prodane v zadostnih količinah in v običajnem poteku trgovanja v Indiji, je bila normalna vrednost v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cen, ki so jih nepovezane stranke plačale ali se plačujejo.
For the other types, namely the type mentioned in recital 23 above and the types not sold domestically, normal value was constructed on the basis of the costs of manufacturing incurred by the applicant for the exported model in question plus a reasonable amount for sales, general and administrative (SG&A) costs and for profit in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za druge vrste, torej vrste, navedene v uvodni izjavi (23), in vrste, ki se ne prodajajo na domačem trgu, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje, ki jih je imel vložnik za zadeven izvožen model, k čemur se je dodal razumen znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA) ter dobiček v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
Given the high level of profitable domestic sales made in the ordinary course of trade, the SG&A costs and the profit were based on all domestic sales of the like product on the domestic market.
Glede na visoko stopnjo dobičkonosnih domačih prodaj, izvedenih v običajnem poteku trgovanja, so stroški PSA in dobiček temeljili na vsej domači prodaji podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu.
In all cases where PET film was directly exported to independent customers in the EU, the export prices were established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih, v katerih se je folija iz PET neposredno izvozila neodvisnim strankam iz EU, so se izvozne cene določile v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, torej na podlagi cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali se plačujejo.
For the export sales to the EU made through a related company, the export price was established on the basis of prices at which the imported products were first resold to an independent buyer in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Za izvoz v EU, opravljen prek povezane družbe, se je izvozna cena določila na podlagi cen, po katerih so uvožene izdelke prvič preprodali neodvisnemu kupcu v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
For this purpose, adjustments were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale to the first independent customer in the Union market.
V ta namen so bile izvedene prilagoditve, ki upoštevajo vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in ponovno prodajo prvi neodvisni stranki na trgu Unije.
A reasonable margin for SG&A costs and profit was also deducted for these sales.
Za to prodajo je bila prav tako odšteta razumna stopnja za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške ter dobiček.
The percentages used to calculate the profit and the SG&A costs were in line with those reported in the Profit and Loss account of the related company.
Odstotki, uporabljeni za izračun dobička ter prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov, so bili usklajeni s tistimi, navedenimi v izkazu poslovnega izida povezane družbe.
In order to ensure a fair comparison between normal value and the export price, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike v dejavnikih, za katere se je izkazalo, da so vplivali na cene in primerljivost cen.
For this purpose, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, commissions, financial costs and packing costs paid by the applicant where applicable and justified.
V ta namen so bile narejene ustrezne prilagoditve za razlike pri stroških prevoza, zavarovanja, manipuliranja, natovarjanja in drugih dodatnih stroških, stroških provizij, finančnih stroških ter stroških pakiranja, ki jih je vložnik plačal po potrebi in kadar je bilo upravičeno.
As provided for pursuant to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost glede na vrsto primerjana s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
This comparison did not show the existence of dumping.
Ta primerjava ni pokazala, da je damping obstajal.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances alleged by the applicant could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je proučilo tudi, ali se glede spremenjenih okoliščin, ki jih je navedel vložnik, lahko štejejo, da so trajne narave.
The investigation showed that the indicative dumping margin calculated for the export sales of the applicant to third countries in the RIP was also negative.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bila izračunana okvirna stopnja dampinga za izvoz vložnika v tretje države v OPP prav tako negativna.
In terms of volume, these sales were several times higher than the export sales to the EU.
Ta prodaja je bila po obsegu nekajkrat večja od izvoza v EU.
It was also found that the applicant made significant investments as from 2007 to improve its production process and to produce the basic raw material which is necessary for the production of the product concerned.
Prav tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vložnik od leta 2007 veliko vlagal v izboljšanje proizvodnega postopka in proizvodnjo osnovnih surovin, ki so potrebne za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka.
These changes have resulted in, in particular, a reduction of costs and have thus explained the direct impact on the Company dumping margin.
Te spremembe so povzročile zlasti zmanjšanje stroškov in so tako pojasnile neposreden vpliv na stopnjo dampinga družbe.
This change in circumstances can be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Ta sprememba okoliščin se lahko šteje, da je trajne narave.
It was therefore considered that the circumstances that led to the initiation of this interim review are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future in a manner that would affect the findings of the present interim review.
Štelo se je, da se okoliščine, ki so privedle do začetka tega vmesnega pregleda, v bližnji prihodnosti verjetno ne bodo toliko spremenile, da bi vplivale na ugotovitve iz tega vmesnega pregleda.
Hence, it was concluded that the changed circumstances are of a lasting nature and that the application of the anti-dumping measure at its current level is no longer justified.
Zato se je sklenilo, da so spremenjene okoliščine trajne narave in da uporaba protidampinškega ukrepa na sedanji ravni ni več upravičena.
In the light of the results of this review investigation, it is considered appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from the applicant to 0 %.
Glede na rezultate te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se zdi primerno, da se protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka vložnika, spremeni na 0 %.
Pursuant to Article 14(1) of the basic Regulation and Article 24(1), second subparagraph, of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [12], no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from export subsidisation.
V skladu s členom 14(1) osnovne uredbe in drugim pododstavkom člena 24(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [12] za noben izdelek ne smejo hkrati veljati protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za obravnavanje enakih razmer, ki izhajajo iz dampinga ali izvoznega subvencioniranja.
As mentioned in recital 9 above, the applicant is subject to a countervailing duty.
Za vložnika velja izravnalna dajatev, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (9).
Since the anti-dumping duty established for the applicant is 0 % with regard to the product concerned, this situation does not arise in the present case.
Ker je protidampinška dajatev za vložnika v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom 0 %, v tem primeru to ne velja.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose to amend the duty rate applicable to the applicant and were given an opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala predlagati sprememba stopnje dajatve, ki se uporablja za vložnika, in so imele možnost, da podajo svoje pripombe.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, the definitive findings have been modified accordingly,
Po proučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile strani, so se dokončne ugotovitve ustrezno spremenile –
The table in Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 is hereby amended by inserting the following:
Razpredelnica iz člena 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2007 se spremeni, tako da se vstavi naslednje:
‘Vacmet India Limited, Anant Plaza, IInd Floor, 4/117-2A, Civil Lines, Church Road, Agra-282002, Uttar Pradesh, India
„Vacmet India Limited, Anant Plaza, IInd Floor, 4/117-2A, Civil Lines, Church Road, Agra-282002, Uttar Pradesh, Indija
OJ C 8, 14.1.2010, p. 27.
UL C 8, 14.1.2010, str. 27.
OJ C 8, 14.1.2010, p. 29.
UL C 8, 14.1.2010, str. 29.
In September 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 1424/2006 [6], the Council, following a new exporting producer request, amended Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 in respect of an Indian PET film producer. The amended Regulation established a dumping margin of 15,5 % and an anti-dumping duty rate of 3,5 % for the company concerned taking into account the company’s export subsidy margin as ascertained in the anti-subsidy investigation which led to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je septembra 2006 na zahtevo novega proizvajalca izvoznika z Uredbo (ES) št. 1424/2006 [6] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 glede indijskega proizvajalca folije iz PET. Spremenjena uredba je za zadevno družbo določila stopnjo dampinga v višini 15,5 % in stopnjo protidampinške dajatve v višini 3,5 % ob upoštevanju stopnje izvozne subvencije za družbo, kot je bila ugotovljena v protisubvencijski preiskavi, na podlagi katere je bila sprejeta Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 206/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 206/2011
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 15(1), 19(1) and 22(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti členov 19 in 22 Uredbe,
PROCEDURE
A POSTOPEK
Previous investigation and existing countervailing measures
Predhodna preiskava in obstoječi izravnalni ukrepi
In December 1999, by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [2], the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film (the product concerned) currently falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290, originating in India.
Svet je decembra 1999 z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek), ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290, s poreklom iz Indije.
The measures took the form of an ad valorem countervailing duty, ranging between 3,8 % and 19,1 % imposed on imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 19,1 % imposed on imports of the product concerned from all other companies.
Ukrepi v obliki izravnalne dajatve ad valorem v višini med 3,8 % in 19,1 % so bili uvedeni na uvoz poimensko navedenih izvoznikov, na uvoz zadevnega izdelka od vseh drugih družb pa je bila uvedena stopnja preostale dajatve v višini 19,1 %.
In March 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [3] (Regulation (EC) No 367/2006), the Council, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation, maintained the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 on imports of PET film originating in India.
Svet je marca 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006 [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006) po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe ohranil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije.
The review investigation period was 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2004.
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom je trajalo od 1. oktobra 2003 do 30. septembra 2004.
In August 2006, by Regulation (EC) No 1288/2006 [4], the Council, following an interim review concerning the subsidisation of an Indian PET film producer, amended the definitive countervailing duty imposed on this company by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je avgusta 2006 po vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja indijskega proizvajalca folije iz PET z Uredbo (ES) št. 1288/2006 [4] spremenil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno za to družbo z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
In September 2007, by Regulation (EC) No 1124/2007 [5], the Council, following a partial interim review concerning the subsidisation of another Indian PET film producer, amended the definitive countervailing duty imposed on this company by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006.
Svet je septembra 2007 po delnem vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja drugega indijskega proizvajalca folije iz PET z Uredbo (ES) št. 1124/2007 [5] spremenil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno za to družbo z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
In January 2009, by Regulation (EC) No 15/2009 [6], the Council, following a partial interim review initiated by the Commission on its own initiative concerning the subsidisation of five Indian PET film producers, amended the definitive countervailing duty imposed on these companies by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 and the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 [7].
Svet je januarja 2009 po delnem vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja petih indijskih proizvajalcev folije iz PET, ki ga je na lastno pobudo začela Komisija, z Uredbo (ES) št. 15/2009 [6] spremenil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno za te družbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006, in dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2007 [7].
In June 2010, by implementing Regulation (EU) No 579/2010 [8], the Council, following a partial interim review concerning the subsidisation of an Indian PET film producer, amended the definitive countervailing duty imposed on this company by Regulation (EC) 367/2006.
Svet je junija 2010 po delnem vmesnem pregledu glede subvencioniranja indijskega proizvajalca folije iz PET z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 579/2010 [8] spremenil dokončno izravnalno dajatev, uvedeno za to družbo z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006.
It should be noted that Vacmet India Limited is currently subject to a countervailing duty of 19,1 % on the basis of Regulation (EC) 367/2006.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba, da za družbo Vacmet India Limited na podlagi Uredbe (ES) 367/2006 trenutno velja izravnalna dajatev v višini 19,1 %.
It should be noted that Vacmet India Limited is subject to a residual anti-dumping duty of 17,3 % on the basis of Regulation (EC) 1292/2007.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba, da za družbo Vacmet India Limited na podlagi Uredbe (ES) 1292/2007 velja preostala protidampinška dajatev v višini 17,3 %.
On 7 August 2009, the Commission received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 7. avgusta 2009 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
The request, limited in scope to the examination of subsidisation, was lodged by Vacmet India Limited, an exporting producer from India (the applicant).
Zahtevek, po obsegu omejen na preiskavo subvencioniranja, je vložila družba Vacmet India Limited, proizvajalec izvoznik iz Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik).
The applicant provided prima facie evidence that the continued imposition of the measure at its current level is no longer necessary to offset subsidisation.
Vložnik je predložil dokaze prima facie, da za izravnavo subvencije nadaljevanje ukrepov na sedanji ravni ni več potrebno.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed to justify the initiation of a partial interim review, the Commission announced on 14 January 2010, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [9] (notice of initiation), the initiation of a partial interim review, in accordance with Article 19 of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the examination of subsidisation in respect of the applicant.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, ki upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, zato je Komisija z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [9] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku), 14. januarja 2010 začela delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe, po obsegu omejen na proučitev subvencije v zvezi z vložnikom.
The partial interim review investigation was also to assess the need, depending on the review findings, to amend the rate of duty currently applicable to imports of the product concerned from exporting producers in the country concerned not individually mentioned in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006, i.e. the duty rate as applying to ‘all other companies’ in India.
Namen preiskave v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom je bil tudi oceniti potrebo, odvisno od ugotovitev pregleda, po spremembi stopnje dajatve, ki se trenutno uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz zadevne države, ki niso posebej navedeni v členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2006, torej stopnje dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe v Indiji“.
The Commission also announced on 14 January 2010, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [10], the initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures limited in scope to the examination of dumping as far as the applicant is concerned.
Komisija je 14. januarja 2010 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [10] napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, katerega obseg je, kar zadeva vložnika, omejen na proučitev dampinga.
The investigation of the level of subsidisation covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava stopnje subvencioniranja je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ali OPP).