natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed, the impact of the economic crisis in the injury has been examined and it is recognised in recital 101 of the provisional Regulation that the economic downturn and the contraction in demand had a negative effect on the state of the Union industry and that, as such, it has contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Dejansko je bil vpliv gospodarske krize proučen in v uvodni izjavi 101 začasne uredbe se priznava, da sta gospodarska kriza in zmanjšanje povpraševanja negativno vplivala na položaj industrije Unije ter tako prispevala k škodi, ki jo je imela industrija Unije.
However, this does not diminish the damaging injurious effect of the low priced and dumped Chinese imports on the Union market throughout the period considered.
Vendar to ne zmanjšuje škodljivega vpliva poceni in dampinškega kitajskega uvoza na trg Unije v obravnavanem obdobju.
In other words, the economic crisis during the IP aggravated the injury to the Union industry but imports from the PRC have by all means caused the injury which is considered to be material in the sense of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
To pomeni, da je gospodarska kriza v OP povečala škodo industrije Unije, vendar je uvoz iz LRK v vsakem primeru povzročil škodo, ki velja za znatno v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
None of the arguments submitted by the interested parties demonstrates that the impact of factors other than dumped imports from the PRC is such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury found.
Nobena od utemeljitev, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, ni pokazala, da bi bil vpliv drugih dejavnikov, razen dampinškega uvoza iz LRK, tolikšen, da bi odpravil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in ugotovljeno škodo.
In the light of the foregoing and in the absence of any other comments which had not yet been addressed, it is concluded that the dumped imports from the PRC caused material injury to the Union industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno in ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, ki še niso bile obravnavane, se sklene, da je dampinški uvoz iz LRK povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
The conclusions on causation in the provisional Regulation, as summarised in the recitals 117-119 thereof, are hereby confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve o vzročni zvezi iz začasne uredbe, kot so povzete v uvodnih izjavah 117 do 119 začasne uredbe, se tako potrdijo.
In view of parties’ comments the Commission conducted further analysis of all arguments pertaining to the Union interest.
Glede na pripombe zainteresiranih strani je Komisija izvedla nadaljnjo analizo vseh argumentov, ki se nanašajo na interes Unije.
The complainants reiterated that the imposition of anti-dumping measures was essential for the Union industry to continue to be viable and operate in the future, as the price erosion caused by dumped imports from the PRC had severely affected the sales, profitability and ability to invest of the Union industry.
Pritožniki so ponovno navedli, da je uvedba protidampinških ukrepov bistvena za nadaljnjo uspešnost in delovanje industrije Unije v prihodnosti, saj je znižanje cen zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz LRK zelo vplivalo na prodajo, dobičkonosnost in sposobnost vlaganja industrije Unije.
In the absence of any further specific comment on this point, recitals 122 to 126 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih dodatnih posebnih pripomb v zvezi s tem, se uvodne izjave 122 do 126 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any specific comment on this point, recitals 127 and 128 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih posebnih pripomb v zvezi s tem, se uvodni izjavi 127 in 128 začasne uredbe potrdita.
After the imposition of provisional measures, a number of users and user associations that had not come forward at the provisional stage made themselves known and provided comments.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so pripombe izrazili številni uporabniki in združenja uporabnikov, ki se niso javili v začasni fazi.
Many users reiterated general comments on some of the issues which were already analysed in the provisional Regulation, without providing new information in this respect or additional evidence substantiating such claims.
Veliko uporabnikov je ponovno izrazilo splošne pripombe o nekaterih vprašanjih, ki so že bila analizirana v začasni uredbi, brez zagotovitve novih informacij v zvezi z njimi ali dodatnih dokazov, ki bi utemeljili te trditve.
On some other issues, however, new information was obtained and, subsequently, analysed.
Vseeno so bile v zvezi z nekaterimi vprašanji prejete nove informacije, ki so bile potem analizirane.
Several interested parties argued that the cooperation obtained from the users was not representative of the complexity of the sector and that most users were small to medium sized companies whose situation and views have been neglected in the Union interest analysis.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da sodelovanje uporabnikov ni reprezentativno za obsežnost sektorja ter da je večina uporabnikov majhnih do srednje velikih podjetij, katerih položaj in stališča v analizi interesa Unije niso bili upoštevani.
In this respect it is firstly to be recalled that 13 users submitted a questionnaire reply and several other users submitted, in addition, comments.
V zvezi s tem je najprej treba opozoriti, da je 13 uporabnikov poslalo izpolnjen vprašalnik in da je tudi več drugih uporabnikov poslalo pripombe.
Moreover, several associations acting on behalf of users submitted comments.
Poleg tega je v imenu uporabnikov pripombe poslalo več združenj.
Many of these interested parties also made their views known in a hearing.
Številne od teh zainteresiranih strani so svoja stališča izrazile tudi na zaslišanju.
After adjusting the count in view of the exclusion of yarns from the product scope, the cooperating users accounted for ca. 24 % of the imports of the product concerned.
Po prilagoditvi štetja zaradi izključitve preje iz obsega izdelka so sodelujoči uporabniki pomenili približno 24 % uvoza zadevnega izdelka.
Such cooperation is considered representative.
Takšno sodelovanje se šteje za reprezentativno.
Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that most users that completed a users’ questionnaire were rather large companies.
Kljub temu se prizna, da so uporabniki, ki so izpolnili vprašalnik, večinoma velike družbe.
The Commission is in this respect dependant on the cooperation eventually obtained.
V zvezi s tem je Komisija odvisna od tistih, ki dejansko sodelujejo.
It is however considered that, through the cooperation obtained from several associations (PlasticsEurope, EuCIA, EuPC, Plastindustrien, BPF), the concerns of the small and medium sized companies were indeed voiced and they have been taken into account.
Vseeno velja, da so bila s sodelovanjem več združenj (PlasticsEurope, EuCIA, EuPC, Plastindustrien, BPF) vprašanja malih in srednje velikih podjetij dejansko izražena ter da so bila ta podjetja upoštevana.
A number of users and an association contested the assessment of the Commission concerning the number of people employed in the glass fibres users industry made in recital 130 of the provisional Regulation.
Številni uporabniki in eno združenje so izpodbijali oceno Komisije v zvezi s številom zaposlenih v uporabniški industriji steklenih vlaken, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 130 začasne uredbe.
In this respect it should be recalled that in recital 130 of the provisional Regulation the Commission estimated the total number of people working in all the downstream Union industry of companies using glass fibre products, including the manufacturing of further downstream products, at ca. 50000 to 75000.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija v uvodni izjavi 130 začasne uredbe ocenila celotno število oseb, zaposlenih v vseh družbah s konca proizvodne verige industrije Unije, ki uporabljajo izdelke iz steklenih vlaken, vključno z izdelavo nadaljnjih izdelkov na koncu proizvodne verige, na približno 50000 do 75000.
The above interested parties claimed that this number could reach a total of 200000 to 250000 people and they were requested to substantiate these estimations.
Navedene zainteresirane strani so trdile, da bi lahko število teh oseb znašalo 200000 do 250000, pri čemer so bile pozvane, da utemeljijo te ocene.
Although one association, the European Boating Industry, did provide some back up figures concerning the boatbuilding industry, no conclusive evidence was submitted that would link these employment figures with the product concerned and the like product.
Čeprav je eno združenje, tj. European Boating Industry, zagotovilo nekatere podporne podatke v zvezi z ladjedelništvom, ni bilo predloženih prepričljivih dokazov, ki bi te podatke o zaposlenosti povezali z zadevnim in podobnim izdelkom.
In any event, establishing the interest of glass fibres users on such general data, which comprise the totality of people employed in all downstream levels of the Union industry including divisions of multinational companies having no relation whatsoever with glass fibre products, would seriously affect the credibility of the Union interest analysis.
Vsekakor bi ugotavljanje interesa uporabnikov steklenih vlaken na podlagi tako splošnih podatkov, ki zajemajo vse osebe, zaposlene na vseh ravneh konca proizvodne verige industrije Unije, vključno z enotami multinacionalnih družb, ki nimajo nobene povezave z izdelki iz steklenih vlaken, resno vplivalo na verodostojnost analize interesa Unije.
It should also be recalled that, as mentioned in recital 130 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission also estimated the number of employees of glass fibres using divisions of those companies that used Chinese glass fibres during the IP, at ca. 27000 people.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da je, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 130 začasne uredbe, Komisija ocenila tudi število zaposlenih v enotah, ki uporabljajo steklena vlakna in so del družb, ki so v OP uporabljala kitajska steklena vlakna, na približno 27000 oseb.
This estimate was based on detailed data as submitted by the users’ in their questionnaire replies specifically on the Union employment of those divisions.
Ta ocena je temeljila na podrobnih podatkih o zaposlenosti v teh enotah v Uniji, kot so jih v izpolnjenih vprašalnikih poslali uporabniki.
The estimation was made by aggregating these figures and then extrapolating them to all Chinese imports of the product concerned during the IP.
Ocena je bila izvedena z združevanjem teh podatkov in njihovo ekstrapolacijo za celoten kitajski uvoz zadevnega izdelka v OP.
The extrapolation was based on the cooperating users’ share in the total Chinese imports of the product concerned during the IP.
Ekstrapolacija je temeljila na deležu sodelujočih uporabnikov v celotnem kitajskem uvozu zadevnega izdelka v OP.
Finally in this respect it should also be noted that, following the exclusion of yarns from the product scope, the above estimation had to be revised.
Končno je v zvezi s tem treba tudi navesti, da je bilo treba po izključitvi preje iz obsega izdelka navedeno oceno popraviti.
The revision resulted in an estimated employment of ca. 22000 people.
Popravljena ocena znaša približno 22000 oseb.
Impact of duty cost on profitability of users
Vpliv stroškov dajatev na dobičkonosnost uporabnikov
Several users claimed that the Commission, in recitals 132-136 of the provisional Regulation, had underestimated the impact of the provisional anti-dumping duty on the profitability and, hence, viability of the European user industry.
Več uporabnikov je trdilo, da je Komisija v uvodnih izjavah 132 do 136 začasne uredbe podcenila vpliv začasne protidampinške dajatve na dobičkonosnost in posledično sposobnost preživetja evropske uporabniške industrije.
They claimed that the actual impact was much higher and that the provisional duty level put the existence of many of these businesses in the Union in peril.
Trdili so, da je dejanski vpliv veliko večji in da stopnja začasne dajatve ogroža obstoj več teh podjetij v Uniji.
In this respect it is important to note that the economic assessment made in the provisional Regulation was based on the economic data submitted by the users cooperating in the investigation.
V zvezi s tem je treba navesti, da je gospodarska ocena iz začasne uredbe temeljila na gospodarskih podatkih, ki so jih predložili uporabniki, ki so sodelovali v preiskavi.
This was in fact the only verifiable information available in this respect.
To so bile dejansko edine preverljive informacije, ki so bile na voljo v zvezi s tem.
Though this assessment was criticised by a large number of users, only one of them submitted additional information that could be used in order to render the analysis more precise.
Čeprav je to oceno kritiziralo veliko uporabnikov, je le eden od njih predložil dodatne informacije, ki bi se lahko uporabile za natančnejšo analizo.
In any event, the party in question is a user of yarns, therefore its submission was eventually not considered in the cost impact analysis.
Zadevna stran je uporabnik preje, zato podatki, ki jih je predložila, nazadnje niso bili upoštevani v analizi vpliva stroškov.
Additional claims were made alleging that the impact on small and medium-sized users is larger than that established.
Uporabniki so tudi trdili, da je vpliv na male in srednje velike uporabnike večji od ugotovljenega.
However, little concrete evidence has been provided in this respect in the absence of full cooperation of such users.
Vendar je bilo v zvezi s tem zagotovljenih malo konkretnih dokazov zaradi nepopolnega sodelovanja takšnih uporabnikov.
Indeed, the cooperating users include some multinational companies on which the effect of duties is likely to be more limited.
Sodelujoči uporabniki sicer dejansko vključujejo nekatere multinacionalne družbe, pri katerih je vpliv dajatev verjetno bolj omejen.
However, in order to exclude this distorting impact in the calculation, at definitive stage the Commission established the average cost impact only for the glass- fibre- using division of the cooperating users, instead of the whole companies — see recital 123 below.
Vendar je Komisija, da bi izključila ta izkrivljajoči vpliv v izračunu, v zaključni fazi določila povprečen vpliv stroškov le za enote sodelujočih uporabnikov, ki uporabljajo steklena vlakna, in ne za celotne družbe – glej uvodno izjavo 123.
Following the exclusion of yarns from the product scope, the assessment made at the provisional stage had to be revised by eliminating from the analysis the companies using yarns.
Po izključitvi preje iz obsega izdelka je bilo treba oceno, narejeno v začasni fazi, popraviti tako, da so se iz analize odstranile družbe, ki uporabljajo prejo.
In addition, the assessment necessitated further modifications in view of the duty levels to be applied (see recital 139 below).
Poleg tega je bilo treba oceno dodatno spremeniti glede na stopnje dajatev, ki se uporabljajo (glej uvodno izjavo 139).
In view of the above revisions, the calculated impact of the duty for the user industry will be on average only around 0,5 and up to 2,3 percentage points on the profit of glass fibre using divisions of users.
Glede na navedene spremembe bo izračunani vpliv dajatev za uporabniško industrijo povprečno le okoli 0,5 in največ 2,3 odstotne točke na dobiček enot uporabnikov, ki uporabljajo steklena vlakna.
The impact will thus be much smaller than anticipated at the provisional stage, if significant at all, as it is unlikely that a small cost price increase as the one possibly caused by the preset duty rates cannot be passed on completely or at least in part.
Vpliv bo tako veliko manjši, kot je bilo predvideno v začasni fazi, če bo sploh pomemben, saj je malo verjetno, da se majhno povišanje stroškov, kot je povišanje, ki bi ga verjetno povzročile veljavne davčne stopnje, ne more povsem ali vsaj delno prenesti.
Indeed, as concerns the ability to pass on cost price increases, information has been obtained from the complainant on the development of the cost price of resins, another key cost for users and sometimes even representing a majority part of the cost price of composite end products.
Dejansko je v zvezi z zmožnostjo prenosa povišanja stroškov pritožnik poslal informacije o razvoju stroškov smole, ki so še eden od ključnih stroškov za uporabnike in v nekaterih primerih pomenijo celo večino stroška kompozitnih končnih izdelkov.
According to this submission, whereas the glass fibres sales price (cost price for users) would have remained stable for very long, the cost price of resins would have doubled in the same period.
V skladu s tem bi se stroški smole v enakem obdobju podvojili, medtem ko bi prodajna cena steklenih vlaken (strošek za uporabnike) zelo dolgo ostala stabilna.
The price increase of resins would again be pronounced since the end of 2009.
Povišanje cene smole je bilo spet izrazito od konca leta 2009.
In spite of these very significant price increases, users have continued to buy this key raw material and to sell their end-products, remaining competitive.
Kljub tem zelo velikim povišanjem cen so uporabniki še naprej kupovali to ključno surovino in prodajali svoje končne izdelke ter ostali konkurenčni.
It is therefore likely that they have managed to pass on at least a part of the cost price increase to their customers.
Zato je verjetno, da so uspeli prenesti vsaj del povišanja stroškov na svoje stranke.
If such a very significant cost price increase can (partly) be passed on to customers, there is no reason why that could not be the case with an anti-dumping duty on glass fibres at the level of the injury elimination level.
Če je tako veliko povišanje stroškov mogoče (delno) prenesti na stranke, ni razloga, da se to ne bi moglo zgoditi s protidampinško dajatvijo na steklena vlakna na ravni stopnje odprave škode.
Some parties claimed that certain users including global groups are and/or will be moving production outside the Union which can create job losses at the Union users; besides, there can be an impact also on the customers of users, as well as on the plastics manufacturers that also supply material to glass fibre users producing composite material.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da nekateri uporabniki, vključno z globalnimi skupinami, premikajo in/ali bodo premaknili proizvodnjo ven iz Unije, kar lahko povzroči izgubo delovnih mest za uporabnike Unije. Poleg tega to lahko vpliva tudi na stranke uporabnikov in proizvajalce plastičnih materialov, ki prav tako dobavljajo material uporabnikom steklene preje, ki proizvajajo kompozitne materiale.
However, this is a potential consequence of the imposition of duties on any intermediate product and not just on glass fibres.
Vendar je to mogoča posledica uvedbe dajatev na kateri koli polizdelek, ne le na steklena vlakna.
Downstream users may as well apply for protection in the framework of anti-dumping proceedings as it has already occurred for glass fibre mesh fabrics.
Uporabniki na koncu proizvodne verige lahko zahtevajo zaščito v okviru protidampinških postopkov, kar se je že zgodilo v primeru tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken.
In any event, any such effects as claimed would now appear very limited due to the duty levels to be applied (see recital 139 below).
Vsekakor bi se zdaj vsi takšni vplivi, kot so bili navedeni, zdeli zelo omejeni zaradi stopenj dajatev, ki se uporabljajo (glej uvodno izjavo 139).
In view of the above, it can be concluded that none of the users which cooperated in the investigation and submitted economic data which could be examined by the Commission would risk survival, as a consequence of the cost increase caused by the proposed measures.
Glede na navedeno se lahko sklene, da preživetje nobenega od uporabnikov, ki so sodelovali v preiskavi in poslali gospodarske podatke, ki jih je lahko proučila Komisija, ne bi bilo ogroženo kot posledica povečanja stroškov zaradi predlaganih ukrepov.
Several users reiterated the claim that the security of supply on the Union market was in peril and that the anti-dumping measures further aggravated this situation.
Več uporabnikov je ponovno trdilo, da je bila varnost oskrbe na trgu Unije ogrožena in da so protidampinški ukrepi dodatno otežili ta položaj.
They substantiated their claim with some evidence, pointing to an inability of the Union industry to secure supply of glass fibres to the user industry at the requested volumes and prices.
Svojo trditev so utemeljili z nekaterimi dokazi, ki so prikazali nezmožnost industrije Unije, da bi zagotovila varno dobavo steklenih vlaken uporabniški industriji v zahtevanem obsegu in po zahtevanih cenah.
In the same vein, the Commission’s mentioning that the idle capacity in the EU was significant enough to replace the imports from the PRC was considered simplified and unjustified.
Podobno so o navedbi Komisije, da so neizkoriščene zmogljivosti v EU dovolj velike za nadomestitev uvoza iz LRK, menili, da je poenostavljena in neupravičena.
The issue was further analysed.
Vprašanje je bilo dodatno analizirano.
New information on production volumes, capacity utilisation and demand was also obtained from the complainant.
Od pritožnika so bile pridobljene tudi nove informacije o obsegu proizvodnje, izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti in povpraševanju.
The information thus obtained and analysed confirmed that there had indeed been a bottleneck of supply of certain products manufactured by the Union industry in the first half of 2010, due to the stock shortages following the recovery of the market after the economic crisis.
Tako pridobljene in analizirane informacije so pokazale, da je v prvi polovici leta 2010 dejansko obstajalo ozko grlo pri dobavi nekaterih izdelkov, ki jih izdeluje industrija Unije, zaradi pomanjkanja zalog zaradi okrevanja trga po gospodarski krizi.
In the meantime, however, and in line with the expectation in this respect mirrored in the provisional Regulation (recitals 145-149), the increase in demand appears to have stabilised and evidence was provided that the EU suppliers had significantly increased their immediately available production during 2010.
Vendar se je medtem in v skladu s pričakovanjem v zvezi s tem, izraženim v začasni uredbi (uvodne izjave 145 do 149), povečanje povpraševanja stabiliziralo in zagotovljen je bil dokaz, da so dobavitelji EU leta 2010 znatno povečali svojo takoj razpoložljivo proizvodnjo.
Further increases in Union industry production capacity were also announced for the short and middle-long term.
Prav tako so bila napovedana nadaljnja kratkoročna in srednjeročna povečanja proizvodne zmogljivosti industrije Unije.
In addition, proof of a significant increase in production capacity in several other producing countries outside the Union was also submitted.
Poleg tega je bil poslan tudi dokaz o znatnem povečanju proizvodne zmogljivosti v več drugih državah proizvajalkah zunaj Unije.
The updated production and production capacity data for yarns were less reassuring and an independent market study also pointed at a clearly less favourable supply situation as concerns yarns.
Posodobljeni podatki o proizvodnji in proizvodni zmogljivosti za prejo so bili manj pomirjujoči in tudi neodvisna tržna študija je pokazala očitno manj ugodno stanje oskrbe s prejo.
However, as yarns were excluded from the product scope, this issue is of no further relevance.
Vendar to vprašanje po izključitvi preje iz obsega izdelka ni več pomembno.
Several users also claimed that some Union producers had increased considerably the prices of certain products immediately before the publication of the provisional Regulation and had started a practice of requesting an increase in prices when additional quantities were requested by users.
Več uporabnikov je tudi trdilo, da so nekateri proizvajalci Unije znatno povišali cene nekaterih izdelkov tik pred objavo začasne uredbe in zahtevali povišanje cen, ko so uporabniki začeli povpraševati po dodatnih količinah.
It was also claimed that some Union producers were only willing to subscribe to short-term contracts (less than 1 year) contrary to the previous practice.
Prav tako so trdili, da so bili nekateri proizvajalci Unije v nasprotju z običajno prakso pripravljeni podpisati le kratkoročne pogodbe (manj kot eno leto).