natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
urban development projects in the case of urban development funds;
projektov razvoja mestnih območij v primeru skladov za razvoj mestnih območij;
financial engineering instruments for small and medium-sized enterprises;
dejavnosti finančnega inženiringa za mala in srednje velika podjetja;
in the case of funds or other incentive schemes providing loans, guarantees for repayable investments, or equivalent instruments, for energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in buildings, including in existing housing.
v primeru skladov ali drugih sistemov spodbud, ki zagotavljajo posojila, jamstva za vračljive naložbe ali enakovredne instrumente, za energetsko učinkovitost in uporabo obnovljivih virov energije v zgradbah, tudi v obstoječih stanovanjskih objektih.
Resources returned to the operation from investments undertaken by funds as defined in Article 44 or left over after all guarantees have been honoured shall be reused by the competent authorities of the Member States concerned for the benefit of urban development projects, of small and medium-sized enterprises or for energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in buildings, including in existing housing.’;
Sredstva, ki se vrnejo operaciji iz naložb v okviru skladov, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 44, ali ki so ostala, ko so bila izplačana vsa jamstva, pristojni organi zadevnih držav članic ponovno uporabijo v korist projektov razvoja mestnih območij, malih in srednje velikih podjetij ali za energetsko učinkovitost in uporabo obnovljivih virov energije v zgradbah, tudi v obstoječih stanovanjskih objektih.“.
Article 82(1) is amended as follows:
Člen 82(1) se spremeni:
in the second subparagraph, the following point is added:
v drugem pododstavku se doda naslednja točka:
for Member States that were granted loans in 2009 in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term assistance for Member States' balances of payments or for Member States with a decrease in GDP in 2009 of more than 10 % in real terms in comparison to 2008: in 2010, 2 % of the contribution from the Cohesion Fund and 4 % of the contribution from the ESF to the operational programme.
za države članice, ki so jim bila v letu 2009 odobrena posojila v sladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic, ali za države članice, katerih BDP je v letu 2009 realno padel za več kot 10 % v primerjavi z letom 2008: v letu 2010 2 % prispevka iz Kohezijskega sklada in 4 % prispevka iz ESS za operativni program.
‘For the purpose of applying the criteria referred to in point (f) of the second subparagraph, GDP figures shall be based on Community statistics published in November 2009.(12) in Article 88(3), the following subparagraph is added:
„Za namen uporabe meril iz točke (f) drugega pododstavka podatki o BDP temeljijo na statističnih podatkih Skupnosti, objavljenih novembra 2009.(12) V členu 88(3) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘However, in cases where irregularities in operations which have been subject to a declaration of partial closure are detected by the Member State, Article 98(2) and (3) shall apply.
„Vendar če države članice ugotovijo nepravilnosti v operacijah, za katere velja izjava o delni zaključitvi, se uporabi člen 98(2) in (3).
The statement of expenditure referred to in paragraph 2(a) of this Article shall be adjusted accordingly.’;
Izkaz o izdatkih iz točke (a) odstavka 2 tega člena se ustrezno prilagodi.“.
Article 93 is amended as follows:
Člen 93 se spremeni:
The Commission shall automatically decommit any part of the amount calculated in accordance with the second subparagraph in an operational programme that has not been used for payment of the pre-financing or interim payments or for which an application for payment has not been sent in conformity with Article 86 by 31 December of the second year following the year of budget commitment under the programme, with the exception mentioned in paragraph 2.
Komisija samodejno razveljavi vsak del zneska, izračunanega v skladu z drugim pododstavkom, v operativnem programu, ki ni bil uporabljen za plačilo vnaprejšnjega financiranja ali vmesnih plačil ali za katerega ni bil poslan zahtevek za plačilo v skladu s členom 86 do 31. decembra dve leti po letu proračunske obveznosti po programu, razen v primeru iz odstavka 2.
For the purpose of the automatic decommitment, the Commission shall calculate the amount by adding one sixth of the annual budget commitment related to the 2007 total annual contribution to each of the 2008 to 2013 budget commitments.’,
Komisija za namene samodejnega prenehanja prevzetih obveznosti znesek izračuna tako, da vsaki proračunski obveznosti med letoma 2008 do 2013 doda šestino letne proračunske obveznosti, povezane s skupnim letnim prispevkom za leto 2007.“;
the following paragraph is inserted:
doda se naslednji odstavek:
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 and from paragraph 2, the deadlines for automatic decommitment shall not apply to the annual budget commitment related to the 2007 total annual contribution.’;
Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 in od odstavka 2 se roki za samodejno prenehanje prevzetih obveznosti ne uporabljajo za letne proračunske obveznosti, povezane s skupnim letnim prispevkom za leto 2007.“.
Period of interruption for major projects and aid schemes
Obdobje prekinitve za velike projekte in sheme pomoči
Where the Member State submits a major project application which meets all the requirements laid down in Article 40, the amounts potentially concerned by automatic decommitment shall be reduced by the annual amounts concerned by such major projects.
Kadar država članica predloži vlogo za velik projekt, ki izpolnjuje vse zahteve iz člena 40, se zneski, ki so potencialno predmet samodejnega prenehanja prevzetih obveznosti, zmanjšajo za letne zneske v zvezi s takšnim velikim projektom.
Where the Commission takes a decision to authorise an aid scheme, the amounts potentially concerned by automatic decommitment shall be reduced by the annual amounts concerned by such aid schemes.
Kadar Komisija sprejme odločitev o odobritvi sheme pomoči, se zneski, ki so potencialno predmet samodejnega prenehanja prevzetih obveznosti, zmanjšajo za letne zneske v zvezi s takšno shemo pomoči.
For the annual amounts referred to in paragraph 1, the starting date for the calculation of the automatic decommitment deadlines referred to in Article 93 shall be the date of the subsequent decision necessary in order to authorise such major projects or aid schemes.’.
Za letne zneske navedene v odstavku 1 je začetni datum izračunavanja rokov samodejnega prenehanja obveznosti iz člena 93 enak datumu pozneje izdane odločitve o odobritvi takšnih velikih projektov ali shem pomoči.“.
In order to meet the exceptional circumstances of the transition to the decommitment rules introduced by this Regulation, appropriations which have been cancelled because of decommitments made by the Commission for the financial year 2007 in the implementation of Article 93(1) and Article 97 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 284/2009, pursuant to Article 11 of the Financial Regulation, shall be reconstituted to the extent necessary for the implementation of the second subparagraph of Article 93(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as amended by this Regulation.
Zaradi izrednih okoliščin prehoda na pravila o prenehanju prevzetih obveznosti, uvedena s to uredbo, se proračunska sredstva, ki so bila črtana zaradi prenehanja prevzetih obveznosti s strani Komisije za finančno leto 2007 zaradi izvajanja člena 93(1) in člena 97 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 284/2009 v skladu s členom 11 Finančne uredbe, odobrijo v višini, ki je potrebna za izvajanje drugega pododstavka člena 93(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006, kakor je spremenjena s to uredbo.
However, Article 1(5) and (7) shall apply from 1 August 2006, points (8), (10)(a), (10)(b)(i), (13) and (14) of Article 1 shall apply from 1 January 2007 and points (4), (10)(b)(ii) and (10)(c) of Article 1 shall apply from 10 June 2009.
Vendar se točki (5) in (7) člena 1 uporabljata od 1. avgusta 2006, točke (8), (10)(a), (10)(b)(i), (13) in (14) člena 1 se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2007, točke (4), (10)(b)(ii) in (10)(c) člena 1 pa se uporabljajo od 10. junija 2009.
OJ C 128, 18.5.2010, p. 95.
UL C 128, 18.5.2010, str. 95.
Position of the European Parliament of 5 May 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 3 June 2010.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. maja 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 3. junija 2010.
OJ L 126, 21.5.2009, p. 3.
UL L 126, 21.5.2009, str. 3.
OJ L 94, 8.4.2009, p. 10.
UL L 94, 8.4.2009, str. 10.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 of 8 December 2006 setting out rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund (OJ L 371, 27.12.2006, p. 1.)’;
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1828/2006 z dne 8. decembra 2006 o pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu ter Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj (UL L 371, 27.12.2006, str. 1.)“.
OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p. 1.’;
UL L 53, 23.2.2002, str. 1.“;
European Economic Forecast Autumn 2009 (European Economy.
[10] Evropska gospodarska napoved za jesen 2009 (European Economy, št. 10, 2009; Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti, Luksemburg).“.
Regulation (EU) No 540/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 540/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA)
o spremembah Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA)
Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 [2] provides for assistance to candidate and potential candidate countries in their progressive alignment with the standards and policies of the European Union, including, where appropriate, the acquis communautaire, with a view to membership of the Union.
Uredba (ES) št. 1085/2006 [2] zagotavlja pomoč državam kandidatkam in potencialnim državam kandidatkam pri postopnem usklajevanju s standardi in politikami Evropske unije ter, kjer je ustrezno, tudi s pravnim redom Unije, da bi pridobile članstvo v Uniji.
Article 49 of the Treaty on European Union states that any European State which respects and is committed to promoting the values referred to in Article 2 of that Treaty, namely human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities, may apply to become a member of the Union.
Člen 49 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določa, da vsaka evropska država, ki spoštuje in je zavezana k spoštovanju vrednot iz člena 2 navedene pogodbe, in sicer človeško dostojanstvo, svoboda, demokracija, enakopravnost, pravna država in spoštovanje človekovih pravic, vključno s pravicami oseb, ki pripadajo manjšinam, lahko zaprosi za članstvo v Uniji.
The European Council of 14 December 2006 expressed in its conclusions a renewed consensus on enlargement, including the principle that each applicant country is to be assessed on its own merits.
(3) Evropski svet z dne 14. decembra 2006 je v svojih sklepih izrazil obnovljeno soglasje o širitvi, vključno z načelom, da bo vsaka država prosilka ocenjena glede na svoje zasluge.
Following the submission on 16 July 2009 of the application by the Republic of Iceland (hereafter referred to as ‘Iceland’) for membership of the European Union, the Council has invited the Commission to submit to the Council its opinion on Iceland’s application.
Potem ko je Republika Islandija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Islandija) dne 16. julija 2009 uradno vložila prošnjo za članstvo v Evropski uniji, je Svet pozval Komisijo, naj mu predloži svoje mnenje o prošnji Islandije.
Iceland can therefore be considered as a potential candidate country.
Zato se Islandija lahko šteje za potencialno državo kandidatko.
Under Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 assistance to potential candidate countries and candidate countries from the Western Balkans and Turkey is provided, inter alia, in accordance with the European and Accession Partnerships.
Na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1085/2006 se pomoč potencialnim državam kandidatkam in državam kandidatkam Zahodnega Balkana in Turčiji zagotovi med drugim v skladu z evropskim partnerstvom in partnerstvom za pristop.
Iceland is a member of the European Economic Area.
Islandija je članica Evropskega gospodarskega prostora.
Consequently, assistance under Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 is to be provided taking due account of the Reports and the Strategy Paper comprised in the annual Enlargement package of the Commission,
Posledično se ji zagotovi pomoč na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1085/2006, ob upoštevanju poročil in strateških dokumentov iz letnega širitvenega paketa Komisije –
Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1085/2006 se spremeni:
the following paragraph is added to Article 4:
v členu 4 se doda naslednji odstavek:
‘For Iceland assistance shall be provided in particular subject to the Reports and the Strategy Paper of the Enlargement package.’;
„Islandiji se pomoč zagotovi predvsem na podlagi poročil in strateških dokumentov iz širitvenega paketa.“;
the following is inserted after ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina’ in Annex II:
v Prilogi II se za „Bosna in Hercegovina“ vstavi:
Position of the European Parliament of 11 February 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Decision of the Council of 31 May 2010.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. februarja 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 31. maja 2010.
Council Regulation (EU) No 541/2010
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 541/2010
amending Regulation (EC) No 1104/2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1104/2008 o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 74 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 74 Pogodbe,
The second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) was established by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [1] and by Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [2].
Druga generacija schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) je bila vzpostavljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [1] ter Sklepom Sveta 2007/533/PNZ z dne 12. junija 2007 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [2].
The conditions, procedures and responsibilities applicable to the migration from SIS 1+ to SIS II are laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 1104/2008 [3] and Decision 2008/839/JHA of 24 October 2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [4].
Pogoji, postopki in odgovornosti v zvezi z migracijo s SIS 1+ na SIS II so določeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1104/2008 [3] in Sklepu 2008/839/PNZ z dne 24. oktobra 2008 o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS 1+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [4].
However, those instruments will expire at the latest on 30 June 2010.
Vendar ta instrumenta najpozneje 30. junija 2010 prenehata veljati.
The Commission and the Member States should continue to cooperate closely during all steps of the development and the migration in order to complete the process.
Komisija in države članice bi morale še naprej tesno sodelovati v vseh fazah razvoja in migracije, da bi se ta proces uspešno zaključil.
In the Council conclusions on the SIS II of 26-27 February 2009 and 4-5 June 2009, an informal body consisting of the experts of the Member States and designated as the Global Programme Management Board, was established to enhance the cooperation and to provide direct Member States support to the central SIS II project.
S sklepi Sveta o SIS II z zasedanj 26. in 27. februarja 2009 ter 4. in 5. junija 2009 je bilo ustanovljeno neformalno telo, sestavljeno iz strokovnjakov držav članic in poimenovano Odbor za upravljanje globalnega programa, ki naj bi okrepilo sodelovanje in zagotovilo neposredno podporo držav članic centralnemu projektu SIS II.
The positive result of the work of the group and the necessity to further enhance the cooperation and the transparency of the project justify the formal integration of the group into the SIS II management structure.
Pozitivni rezultat dela skupine ter nujnost nadaljnje krepitve sodelovanja in povečanja preglednosti projekta upravičujeta formalno vključitev skupine v strukturo upravljanja projekta SIS II.
A group of experts, called the Global Programme Management Board should therefore be formally established to complement the current organisational structure.
Zato je treba formalno ustanoviti skupino strokovnjakov, imenovano Odbor za upravljanje globalnega programa, ki bo dopolnila sedanjo organizacijsko strukturo.
In order to ensure efficiency as well as cost effectiveness the number of experts should be limited.
Da bi zagotovili uspešnost in stroškovno učinkovitost, je treba omejiti število strokovnjakov.
This group of experts should be without prejudice to the responsibilities of the Commission and of the Member States.
Ta skupina strokovnjakov ne bi smela posegati v pristojnosti Komisije in držav članic.
The Commission should remain responsible for the Central SIS II and its communication infrastructure.
Komisija bi morala biti še naprej odgovorna za centralni SIS II ter njegovo komunikacijsko infrastrukturo.
It is necessary to maintain and, where appropriate, further develop the Central SIS II and its communication infrastructure.
Centralni SIS II in njegovo komunikacijsko infrastrukturo je treba vzdrževati ter po potrebi še naprej razvijati.
Additional development of the Central SIS II should at all times include the correction of errors.
Dodatni razvoj centralnega SIS II bi moral vedno vključevati odpravljanje napak.
Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA provide that the best available technology, subject to a cost-benefit analysis, should be used for Central SIS II.
Uredba (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklep 2007/533/PNZ določata, da je treba za centralni SIS II uporabljati najboljšo razpoložljivo tehnologijo ob upoštevanju analize stroškov in koristi.
The Annex to the Council Conclusions on the further direction of SIS II from 4-5 June 2009 laid down milestones which should be met in order to continue with the current SIS II project.
V prilogi k sklepom Sveta o prihodnjem razvoju SIS II z zasedanja 4. in 5. junija 2009 so določeni mejniki, ki jih je treba doseči za nadaljevanje sedanjega projekta SIS II.
In parallel, a study has been conducted concerning the elaboration of an alternative technical scenario for developing SIS II based on SIS 1+ evolution (SIS 1+ RE) as the contingency plan, in case the tests demonstrate non-compliance with the milestone requirements.
Hkrati je bila opravljena raziskava glede oblikovanja nadomestnega tehničnega scenarija za razvoj SIS II na podlagi razvoja SIS 1+ (SIS 1+ RE) kot kriznega načrta, če bi se pri preizkusih pokazala neskladnost z zahtevami iz mejnikov.
Based on these parameters, the Council may decide to invite the Commission to switch to the alternative technical scenario.
Na podlagi teh parametrov se Svet lahko odloči, da Komisijo pozove, naj preide na nadomestni tehnični scenarij.
The description of the technical components of the migration architecture therefore should be adapted to allow for another technical solution, and in particular the SIS 1+ RE regarding the development of Central SIS II.
Opis tehničnih elementov arhitekture za migracijo bi bilo treba zato prilagoditi, da bo v zvezi z razvojem centralnega SIS II mogoča druga tehnična rešitev, zlasti SIS 1+ RE.
SIS 1+ RE is a possible technical solution to develop Central SIS II and to achieve the objectives of the SIS II laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA.
SIS 1+ RE je možna tehnična rešitev za razvoj centralnega SIS II in uresničitev ciljev SIS II, ki so določeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklepu 2007/533/PNZ.
The SIS 1+ RE is characterised by uniqueness of means between SIS II development and SIS 1+ .
Za SIS 1+ RE je značilno, da predstavlja edinstveno srednjo pot med razvojem SIS II in SIS 1+.
The references in this Regulation to the technical architecture of SIS II and to the migration process should therefore, in case of implementation of an alternative technical scenario, be read as the references to SIS II based on another technical solution, as applied mutatis mutandis to the technical specificities of this solutions, in keeping with the objective to develop Central SIS II.
Zato bi bilo treba v primeru, če bo uporabljen alternativni tehnični scenarij, tehnično arhitekturo SIS II in postopek migracije v tej uredbi razumeti kot SIS II, ki temelji na drugačni tehnični rešitvi in se uporablja smiselno glede na tehnične značilnosti te rešitve, v skladu s cilji razvoja centralnega SIS II.
As regards the financing of the development of the Central SIS II based on an alternative technical solution, it should be covered by the general budget of the Union while respecting the principle of sound financial management.
Razvoj centralnega SIS II na podlagi nadomestne tehnične rešitve je treba financirati iz splošnega proračuna Unije ob upoštevanju načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
In accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], the Commission may delegate budget implementation tasks to national public sector bodies.
V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], lahko Komisija naloge izvrševanja proračuna zaupa nacionalnim organom javnega sektorja.
Following the political orientation and subject to the conditions laid down in Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, the Commission would be invited, in case of switchover to the alternative solution, to delegate the budget implementation tasks related to the development of the SIS II based on SIS 1+ RE to France.
V skladu s politično usmeritvijo in ob upoštevanju pogojev iz Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 bi bila Komisija v primeru prehoda na nadomestno rešitev pozvana, naj naloge izvrševanja proračuna, povezane z razvojem SIS II na podlagi SIS 1+ RE, zaupa Franciji.
In any technical scenario, the result of migration at central level should be availability of the SIS 1+ database and new SIS II functionalities, including additional data categories, in the Central SIS II.
V vseh tehničnih rešitvah je rezultat migracije na centralni ravni razpoložljivost podatkovne zbirke SIS 1+ in novih funkcij SIS II, med drugim tudi dodatnih vrst podatkov, v centralnem SIS II.
The Member States should remain responsible for their national systems (N.SIS II).
Države članice bi morale biti še naprej odgovorne za svoje nacionalne sisteme (N.SIS II).