natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Detailed arrangements for the participation of third States shall be the subject of agreements concluded pursuant to Article 37 TEU and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 218 TFEU.
Podrobna pravila za sodelovanje tretjih držav so predmet sporazumov, ki se sklenejo na podlagi člena 37 PEU in v skladu s postopkom iz člena 218 PDEU.
Where the Union and a third State have concluded an agreement establishing a framework for the latter’s participation in crisis management operations of the Union, the provisions of such an agreement shall apply in the context of this operation.
Če sta Unija in tretja država sklenili sporazum o vzpostavitvi okvira za sodelovanje te tretje države v operacijah Unije za krizno upravljanje, se za namene te operacije Unije uporabljajo določbe takšnega sporazuma.
Third States making significant military contributions to EUFOR Libya shall have the same rights and obligations in terms of day-to-day management of the operation as Member States taking part in the operation.
Tretje države, ki v vojaškem smislu znatno prispevajo k EUFOR Libya, imajo enake pravice in obveznosti glede vsakodnevnega vodenja operacije kakor države članice, ki sodelujejo v tej operaciji.
The Council hereby authorises the PSC to take relevant decisions on the setting-up of a Committee of Contributors, should third States provide significant military contributions.
Svet pooblašča PVO za sprejetje ustreznih sklepov o ustanovitvi odbora sodelujočih držav, če bi tretje države v vojaškem smislu znatno prispevale.
Status of Union-led forces and personnel
Status sil in osebja pod vodstvom Unije
The status of Union-led forces and their personnel, including the privileges, immunities and further guarantees necessary for the fulfilment and smooth functioning of their mission, may be the subject of agreements concluded pursuant to Article 37 TEU and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 218(3) TFEU.
Status sil in njihovega osebja pod vodstvom Unije, vključno s privilegiji, imunitetami ter dodatnimi jamstvi, potrebnimi za izvedbo in nemoteno delovanje njihove misije, je lahko predmet sporazumov, sklenjenih na podlagi člena 37 PEU in v skladu s postopkom iz člena 218(3) PDEU.
The common costs of EUFOR Libya shall be administered in accordance with Decision 2008/975/CFSP.
Skupni stroški EUFOR Libya se upravljajo v skladu s Sklepom 2008/975/SZVP.
The High Representative is hereby authorised to release to the African Union, Egypt, the League of Arab States, Tunisia, and the United Nations, as well as to other third parties associated with this Decision, classified Union information and documents generated for the purposes of EUFOR Libya up to the level of classification appropriate for each of them and in accordance with the Council’s security regulations [2].
Visoki predstavnik je pooblaščen, da Afriški uniji, Egiptu, Ligi arabskih držav, Tuniziji in Združenim narodom ter drugim tretjim stranem, ki so se pridružile temu sklepu, posreduje tajne informacije in dokumente Unije, pridobljene za namene EUFOR Libya, do stopnje tajnosti, ki ustreza vsakemu od njih ter v skladu s predpisi Sveta o varovanju tajnosti [2].
The High Representative is hereby authorised to release to the African Union, Egypt, the League of Arab States, Tunisia and the United Nations, as well as to other third parties associated with this Decision, unclassified Union documents relating to Council deliberations on EUFOR Libya which are covered by the obligation of professional secrecy pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Council [3].
Visoki predstavnik je pooblaščen, da Afriški uniji, Egiptu, Ligi arabskih držav, Tuniziji in Združenim narodom ter drugim tretjim stranem, ki so se pridružile temu sklepu, posreduje dokumente Unije, ki niso uvrščeni kot tajni in se nanašajo na posvetovanja Sveta v zvezi z EUFOR Libya ter za njih velja obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti iz člena 6(1) Poslovnika Sveta [3].
EUFOR Libya shall, unless the Council decides otherwise, terminate no later than 4 months after reaching Initial Operating Capability.
EUFOR Libya preneha najpozneje štiri mesece po dosegi začetne operativne zmogljivosti, razen če Svet odloči drugače.
This Decision shall be repealed as from the later of the date of closure of the European Union Operational Headquarters or the Force Headquarters, in accordance with the plans approved for the termination of EUFOR Libya, and without prejudice to the relevant procedures regarding the audit and presentation of the accounts thereof as laid down in Decision 2008/975/CFSP.
Ta sklep se razveljavi z dnem, ko preneha delovati operativno poveljstvo ali poveljstvo sil Evropske unije v skladu z odobrenimi načrti o prenehanju EUFOR Libya in ne glede na postopke v zvezi z revizijskim pregledom in predložitvijo računov o EUFOR Libya, kot je določeno v Sklepu 2008/975/SZVP.
The financial reference amount for the common costs of EUFOR Libya shall be EUR 7900000. The percentage of the reference amount referred to in Article 25(1) of Decision 2008/975/CFSP shall be 30 %.
Referenčni finančni znesek skupnih stroškov EUFOR Libya je 7900000 EUR. Delež referenčnega zneska iz člena 25(1) Sklepa 2008/975/SZVP je 30 %.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/210/CFSP of 1 April 2011 on a European Union military operation in support of humanitarian assistance operations in response to the crisis situation in Libya (EUFOR Libya)
Popravek Sklepa Sveta 2011/210/SZVP z dne 1. aprila 2011 o vojaški operaciji Evropske unije v podporo operacijam humanitarne pomoči v odziv na krizne razmere v Libiji (EUFOR Libya)
(Official Journal of the European Union L 89 of 5 April 2011)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 89 z dne 5. aprila 2011)
On page 18, recital 11:
Stran 18, uvodna izjava 11:
Denmark does not, therefore, participate in the financing of this operation,’,
Danska torej ne sodeluje pri financiranju te operacije“
Denmark does not participate in the implementation of this Decision and therefore does not participate in the financing of this operation,’.
Danska ne sodeluje pri izvajanju tega sklepa in zato ne sodeluje pri financiranju te operacije“.
in application of Article 7 of Council Directive 89/686/EEC as regards a prohibition measure adopted by the UK authorities in respect of guided type fall arrester, of the type HACA Leitern 0529.7102
o uporabi člena 7 Direktive Sveta 89/686/EGS glede ukrepa prepovedi, ki so ga sprejeli organi Združenega kraljestva v zvezi z drsečo napravo za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu tipa 0529.7102, ki jo proizvaja podjetje HACA Leitern
Article 7(1) of Directive 89/686/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to personal protective equipment (PPE) provides that where a Member State ascertains that personal protective equipment bearing the CE marking and used in accordance with its intended purpose could compromise the safety of persons, domestic animals or property, it shall take all necessary measures to remove such personal protective equipment from the market and to prohibit the placing on the market or free movement thereof.
Člen 7(1) Direktive 89/686/EGS o približevanju zakonov držav članic v zvezi z osebno zaščitno opremo („OZO“) določa, da če država članica ugotovi, da bi osebna zaščitna oprema, ki ima oznako ES in se uporablja v skladu s predvidenim namenom, lahko ogrozila varnost posameznikov, domačih živali ali premoženja, sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da tako osebno zaščitno opremo umakne s trga in prepove njeno dajanje v promet ali prosti pretok.
Pursuant to Article 7(2) of Directive 89/686/EEC, the Commission is required, after consulting the parties concerned, to declare whether it finds such a measure justified or not.
V skladu s členom 7(2) Direktive 89/686/EGS se mora Komisija po posvetovanju z zadevnimi stranmi izreči, ali je takšen ukrep upravičen ali ne.
If the measure is found justified, the Commission shall inform the Member States so that they can take all appropriate measures with respect to the equipment concerned, in accordance with their obligations under Article 2(1) of Directive 89/686/EEC.
Če se ugotovi, da je ukrep upravičen, Komisija o tem obvesti države članice, ki v skladu s svojimi obveznostmi iz člena 2(1) Direktive 89/686/EGS sprejmejo vse ustrezne ukrepe v zvezi z zadevno opremo.
On 31 January 2008, the UK authorities notified to the European Commission a measure prohibiting the placing on the market of a guided type fall arrester, of the type HACA Leitern 0529.7102, manufactured by HACA Leitern – Lorenz Hasenbach GmbH u. Co. KG, Diesselstrasse 12, 65520 Bad Camberg, Germany (HACA)
Organi Združenega kraljestva so 31. januarja 2008 Evropsko komisijo obvestili o ukrepu, ki prepoveduje dajanje v promet drseče naprave za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu tipa 0529.7102, ki jo proizvaja podjetje HACA Leitern – Lorenz Hasenbach GmbH u. Co. KG, Diesselstrasse 12, D-65520 Bad Camberg. (HACA)
According to the documents submitted to the Commission this protective equipment was subject to the conformity assessment procedure set out in Article 11A of the Directive, attested by the following documents issued by EXAM BBG Prüf- und Zertifizier GmbH (since become DEKRA EXAM GmbH) — notified body No 0158):
Ta zaščitna oprema je bila v skladu z dokumenti, predloženimi Komisiji, predmet postopka ocene skladnosti iz člena 11A direktive, kar potrjujeta naslednja dokumenta, ki ju je izdalo podjetje EXAM BBG Prüf- und Zertifizier GmbH (danes DEKRA EXAM GmbH – št. priglašenega organa 0158):
No ZQ/B 212/06,
št. ZQ/B 212/06,
No ZQ/B 212/07.
št. ZQ/B 212/07.
The UK authorities indicated that their measure was based on the fact that the guided type fall arrester concerned failed to comply with the basic health and safety requirements (BHSR) referred to in Article 3 of Directive 89/686/EEC and, in particular, with BHSR 3.1.2.2 and BHSR 1 and 1.1.1 in Annex II to Directive 89/686/EEC.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so navedli, da njihov ukrep temelji na dejstvu, da zadevna drseča naprava za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu ne izpolnjuje osnovnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz člena 3 Direktive 89/686/EGS ter zlasti osnovnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz točke 3.1.2.2 in 1 ter 1.1.1 iz Priloge II k Direktivi 89/686/EGS.
The UK authorities submitted a test report by TUV NEL Ltd to substantiate their findings.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so v podporo svojim ugotovitvam predložili poročilo o preskusu, ki ga je opravilo podjetje TUV NEL Ltd.
According to the UK authorities, in particular in the foreseeable situation where a person fell backwards before falling down (the ‘fall-back’ situation), the protective equipment did not provide adequate protection against all risks encountered as required by BHSR 1 [2].
Organi Združenega kraljestva navajajo, da zaščitna oprema zlasti v predvidljivih okoliščinah, ko oseba pade nazaj, preden pade navzdol, ni zagotovila zadostne zaščite pred tveganji, ki jih preprečujejo osnovne zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz točke 1 [2].
As a result, the guided type fall arrester did not comply with BHSR 1.1.1 [3], which requires a user to be able to perform a risk-related activity normally whilst enjoying appropriate protection to the highest possible level.
Drseča naprava za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu zato ni izpolnjevala osnovnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz točke 1.1.1 [3], ki zahteva, da uporabnik normalno izvaja z nevarnostjo povezano dejavnost, medtem ko je primerno zavarovan na najvišji možni ravni.
Further the UK authorities explained that the protective equipment did not comply with BHSR 3.1.2.2 [4] because tests showed that, under foreseeable conditions of use, the vertical drop of the user was not minimised to prevent collision with obstacles and the braking force exceeded the threshold value at which physical injury might occur.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so tudi pojasnili, da zaščitna oprema ni izpolnjevala osnovnih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz točke 3.1.2.2 [4], saj so preskusi pokazali, da v predvidljivih okoliščinah uporabe ni čim bolj zmanjšala navpičnega padca uporabnika, da bi se preprečilo trčenje z ovirami, in da je zaviralna sila presegla mejo, pri kateri lahko nastanejo fizične poškodbe.
The UK authorities further indicated that they intended to launch a formal objection pursuant to Article 6 of the Directive against standard EN 353-1 — Personal protective equipment against falls from a height — Part 1: Guided type fall arresters including a rigid anchor line, which refers to standard EN 364 — Personal protective equipment against falls from a height — test methods.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so tudi navedli, da nameravajo v skladu s členom 6 Direktive vložiti uradni ugovor proti standardu EN 353-1 – Osebna varovalna oprema za zaščito pred padci z višine – 1. del: Drseče naprave za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu, ki zadeva standard EN 364 – Osebna varovalna oprema za zaščito pred padci z višine – preskusne metode.
On 1 August 2008, the Commission wrote to the manufacturer and, on 26 September 2008, to the notified body that had intervened in the production control phase according to Article 11A of Directive 89/686/EEC, inviting them to communicate their observations regarding the measure taken by the UK authorities.
Komisija je 1. avgusta 2008 pisala proizvajalcu, 26. septembra 2008 pa priglašenemu organu, ki je v skladu s členom 11A Direktive 89/686/EGS posredoval na stopnji nadzora proizvodnje, in ju pozvala, da predložita svoje pripombe glede ukrepa organov Združenega kraljestva.
In their reply dated 28 October 2008, HACA contested the findings of the tests carried out for the UK authorities by TUV NEL.
Podjetje HACA je v svojem odgovoru z dne 28. oktobra 2008 izpodbijalo ugotovitve preskusov, ki jih je za organe Združenega kraljestva izvedlo podjetje TUV NEL.
In particular, they emphasised that their equipment was safe to use and prevented falls from a height, including ‘fall-back’, if used with the correct types of belt.
Poudarilo je zlasti, da je njegova oprema varna za uporabo in da preprečuje padce z višine, vključno s padcem nazaj, če se pri tem uporablja ustrezna vrsta pasu.
HACA further pointed out that the test carried out by TUV NEL did not comply with the requirements of standard EN 364 which did not foresee the use of an anthropomorphic dummy.
Podjetje HACA je tudi poudarilo, da preskusi, ki jih je izvedlo podjetje TUV NEL, niso izpolnjevali zahtev standarda EN 364, ki ne predvideva uporabe človeku podobne lutke.
They explained that the test standard EN 364 allowed the use of a steel weight or a sand bag for the dynamic performance test.
Pojasnilo je, da je standard EN 364 za preskuse pri dinamičnem preskusu učinkovitosti delovanja dovoljeval uporabo teže jekla ali vreče peska.
During testing, they had used a sand bag for measuring the braking force which was always below the allowed value.
Med preskusom je podjetje uporabilo vrečo peska za merjenje zaviralne sile, ki je bila vedno pod dovoljeno vrednostjo.
They observed that TUV NEL had used a steel weight which — in their opinion — would give higher braking forces than a sand bag.
Opazilo je, da je podjetje TUV NEL uporabilo težo jekla, ki po njihovem mnenju povzroča večje zaviralne sile kot vreča peska.
As regards the ‘fall-back’ tests using an anthropomorphic dummy, DEKRA EXAM recalled that such a test was not foreseen by EN 353-1.
Kar zadeva preskus padca nazaj z uporabo človeku podobne lutke, je podjetje DEKRA EXAM ugotovilo, da standard EN 353-1 ne predvideva takega preskusa.
They agreed that the ‘fall-back’ situation was indeed a foreseeable condition of use of such guided type fall arresters.
Strinjalo se je, da je padec nazaj predvidljiva okoliščina uporabe takšnih drsečih naprav za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu.
However, this situation was not addressed in standard EN 353-1.
Standard EN 353-1 pa takšnih okoliščin ne obravnava.
Depending on the kind of fall arrester used and the model of full body harness worn by the user, accidents could occur.
Glede na vrsto uporabljene drseče naprave za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu in modela varovalnega pasu uporabnika bi lahko prišlo do nesreče.
It was therefore necessary to pay attention to the right combination of fall arrester and full body harness, which should be specified by the manufacturer in the information given to the user.
Zato je bilo treba pozornost nameniti pravilni kombinaciji drseče naprave za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu in varovalnega pasu, kar bi moral proizvajalec navesti v navodilih za uporabo.
Due to the complexity of the file, the Commission obtained the assistance of an independent expert.
Zaradi zapletenosti zadeve je Komisija pridobila mnenje neodvisnega strokovnjaka.
The Commission met the UK authorities.
Komisija se je sestala z organi Združenega kraljestva.
The UK authorities explained the exact test methods it relied upon and showed a video of the tests.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so pojasnili dejanske preskusne metode, na katere so se sklicevali, in prikazali video posnetek preskusov.
TUV NEL had carried out two series of tests for the UK authorities.
Podjetje TUV NEL je za organe Združenega kraljestva izvedlo dve seriji preskusov.
During the second series of tests, a representative of the manufacturer had been present.
Med drugo serijo preskusov je bil navzoč predstavnik proizvajalca.
Each series included a dynamic performance test using a steel weight and ‘fall-back’ tests using an anthropomorphic dummy.
Vsaka serija je vključevala dinamični preskus učinkovitosti delovanja z uporabo teže jekla in preskuse padca nazaj z uporabo človeku podobne lutke.
The HACA fall arrester had failed all of these tests.
Drseča naprava za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu podjetja HACA ni prestala nobenega preskusa.
The UK considered that the use of a steel weight for the dynamic performance test gave more reliable results than a sand bag and could explain the difference between the results obtained by TUV NEL and those obtained by DEKRA EXAM.
Združeno kraljestvo je menilo, da je uporaba teže jekla pri dinamičnem preskusu učinkovitosti delovanja dala bolj zanesljive rezultate kot vreča peska, in pojasnjuje razliko med rezultati podjetja TUV NEL in podjetja DEKRA EXAM.
Concerning the ‘fall-back’ test, the UK had carried out tests using an anthropomorphic dummy in order to simulate as closely as possible the foreseeable ‘fall-back’ situation.
Kar zadeva preskus padca nazaj, je Združeno kraljestvo izvedlo preskuse z uporabo človeku podobne lutke, da bi kar najbolje ponazorilo predvidljivo okoliščino padca nazaj.
The results of these tests had shown that the HACA fall arrester did not adequately prevent a fall in that situation.
Rezultati teh preskusov so pokazali, da drseča naprava za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu podjetja HACA v teh okoliščinah ni ustrezno preprečila padca.
These results also revealed a deficiency in the relevant harmonised standard EN 353-1 since the standard did not take account of the ‘fall-back’ situation.
Ti rezultati so pokazali tudi pomanjkljivost ustreznega usklajenega standarda EN 353-1, saj ne vključuje možnosti padca nazaj.
This was the main grounds for the formal objection lodged by the UK against the standard.
To je glavni vzrok, da je Združeno kraljestvo vložilo uradni ugovor proti standardu.
The report of the independent expert [5] concluded that ‘fall-back’, either from a standing or sitting position, is a foreseeable situation which is not taken into account in standard EN 353-1.
Poročilo neodvisnega strokovnjaka [5] ugotavlja, da je padec nazaj iz stoječega ali sedečega položaja predvidljiva okoliščina, ki je standard EN 353-1 ne upošteva.
Following the positive opinion of the Standing Committee set up by Article 5 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] on 19 March 2010, the Commission decided to withdraw the reference of standard EN 353-1 from the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija je v skladu s pozitivnim mnenjem stalnega odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 5 Direktive 98/34/EC Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], z dne 19. marca 2010 določila, da sklicevanje na standard EN 353-1 umakne iz Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
In light of the documentation available, the comments of the parties concerned and the report of the independent expert, the Commission considers that the guided type fall arrester of the type HACA Leitern 0529.7102 fails to comply with BHSRs 1, 1.1.1 and 3.1.2.2 of Annex II to Directive 89/686/EEC, since it does not adequately prevent falls in a ‘fall-back’ situation, and that this non-conformity gives rise to a serious risk for users,
Komisija na podlagi razpoložljive dokumentacije, pripomb zadevnih strani in poročila neodvisnega strokovnjaka meni, da drseča naprava za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu tipa 0529.7102, ki jo proizvaja podjetje HACA Leitern, ne ustreza osnovnim zdravstvenim in varnostnim zahtevam iz točke 1, 1.1.1 in 3.1.2.2 iz Priloge II k Direktivi 89/686/EGS, ker padcev nazaj ne preprečuje v zadostni meri in ta neskladnost povečuje resno tveganje za uporabnike –
The measure taken by the UK authorities prohibiting the placing on the market of a guided type fall arrester, of the type HACA Leitern 0529.7102, manufactured by HACA Leitern – Lorenz Hasenbach GmbH, is justified.
Ukrep, ki so ga sprejeli organi Združenega kraljestva in ki prepoveduje dajanje v promet drseče naprave za zaustavljanje na togem vodilu tipa 0529.7102, ki jo proizvaja podjetje HACA Leitern – Lorenz Hasenbach GmbH, je upravičen.
BHSR 1 — General requirements applicable to all PPE.
Osnovne zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz točke 1 – osnovne zahteve, ki veljajo za vso osebno zaščitno opremo.
BHSR 1.1.1 — Ergonomics.
Osnovne zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz točke 1.1.1 – ergonomija.
BHSR 3.1.2.2 — Prevention of falls from a height.
Osnovne zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz točke 3.1.2.2 – preprečevanje padcev z višine.
Reference No P804674.
Referenčna št. P804674.
In their reply dated 15 October 2008, DEKRA EXAM confirmed that they had issued the relevant Article 11A documents.
Podjetje DEKRA EXAM je v svojem odgovoru z dne 15. oktobra 2008 potrdilo, da je izdalo ustrezne dokumente iz člena 11A.
DEKRA EXAM emphasised that tests had been carried out according to standard EN 353-1 and that the samples tested had fulfilled all the requirements of that standard.
Podjetje DEKRA EXAM je poudarilo, da so bili preskusi izvedeni v skladu s standardom EN 353-1 in da so preskušeni vzorci izpolnjevali vse zahteve navedenega standarda.
of 4 April 2011
z dne 4. aprila 2011
amending Decision 2009/996/EU on a Community financial contribution for 2009 to cover expenditure incurred by Germany, Spain, Italy, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal and Slovenia for the purpose of combating organisms harmful to plants or plant products
o spremembi Sklepa 2009/996/EU o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za leto 2009 za kritje izdatkov, ki so nastali v Nemčiji, Španiji, Italiji, na Malti, Nizozemskem, Portugalskem in v Sloveniji, za boj proti organizmom, škodljivim za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode
(Only the Dutch, German, Italian, Maltese, Portuguese, Slovenian and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v italijanskem, malteškem, nemškem, nizozemskem, portugalskem, slovenskem in španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community [1], and in particular Article 23(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/29/ES z dne 8. maja 2000 o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti [1] ter zlasti člena 23(5) Direktive,