natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the maximum axle load the rail fastening system is designed to accommodate.
največjo osno obremenitev, za prevzem katere je projektiran pritrdilni sistem.
EC declaration of conformity for track sleepers
ES-izjava o skladnosti za tirne pragove
The EC declaration of conformity shall be accompanied by statement setting out the combination of rail, rail inclination and type of rail fastening system with which the sleeper may be used.
ES-izjavo o skladnosti spremlja izjava, ki določa kombinacijo tirnic, nagib tirnic in vrsto pritrdilnega sistema, s katerimi se lahko uporablja prag.
At the request of the applicant, the notified body carries out the EC verification of the infrastructure subsystem in accordance with Article 18 and Annex VI of Directive 2008/57/EC and in accordance with the provisions of the relevant modules.
Na zahtevo vlagatelja priglašeni organ izvede ES-verifikacijo infrastrukturnega podsistema v skladu s členom 18 in Prilogo VI Direktive 2008/57/ES ter v skladu z določbami ustreznih modulov.
If the applicant demonstrates that tests or verifications of an infrastructure subsystem have been successful for previous applications of a design in similar circumstances, the notified body shall take these tests and verifications into account for the EC verification.
Če vlagatelj dokaže, da so bili preskusi ali verifikacije infrastrukturnega podsistema uspešni za prejšnje vloge projekta v podobnih okoliščinah, priglašeni organ te preskuse in verifikacije upošteva pri ES-verifikaciji.
The EC verification of the infrastructure subsystem shall cover the phases and characteristics indicated Table 21 in Annex B to this TSI.
ES-verifikacija infrastrukturnega podsistema obsega faze in značilnosti, navedene v preglednici 21 v Prilogi B te TSI.
Particular assessment procedures for specific basic parameters of Infrastructure subsystem are included in Section 6.2.4.
Posebni postopki ocenjevanja za določene osnovne parametre infrastrukturnega podsistema so vključeni v oddelek 6.2.4.
The applicant shall draw up the EC declaration of verification for the infrastructure subsystem in accordance with Article 18 of and Annex V to Directive 2008/57/EC.
Vlagatelj sestavi ES-izjavo o verifikaciji za infrastrukturni podsistem v skladu s členom 18 in Prilogo V Direktive 2008/57/ES.
For the EC verification procedure of the infrastructure subsystem, the applicant may choose either:
Za postopek ES-verifikacije infrastrukturnega podsistema lahko vlagatelj izbere:
Module SG: EC verification based on unit verification, or
modul SG: ES-verifikacijo na podlagi verifikacije enote ali
Module SH1: EC verification based on full quality management system plus design examination.
modul SH1: ES-verifikacijo na podlagi celovitega sistema za vodenje kakovosti in pregleda projektiranja.
In the case where EC verification is most effectively undertaken by using information collected by the infrastructure manager, contracting entity or the main contractors involved (for example data obtained using track recording vehicle or other measuring devices), the notified body shall take this information into account to assess conformity.
V primeru, kadar se ES verifikacija najučinkoviteje izvede z uporabo informacij, ki jih zbere upravljavec infrastrukture, naročnik ali vključeni glavni izvajalci (na primer podatki, pridobljeni z uporabo merilnega vozila ali drugih merilnih naprav), priglašeni organ te informacije upošteva pri oceni skladnosti.
The SH1 module may be chosen only where the activities contributing to the proposed subsystem to be verified (design, manufacturing, assembling, installation) are subject to a quality management system for design, production, final product inspection and testing, approved and surveyed by a notified body.
Modul SH1 se lahko izbere samo, kadar so dejavnosti, ki so vključene v predloženi podsistem, ki ga je treba preveriti (projektiranje, proizvodnja, sestavljanje, namestitev), predmet sistema vodenja kakovosti za projektiranje, proizvodnjo, pregled končnega proizvoda in preskus, ki ga odobri in nadzoruje priglašeni organ.
If the subsystem includes an innovative solution as mentioned in Section 4.1, the applicant shall state the deviation from the relevant clauses of the TSI and submit them to the Commission.
Če podsistem vključuje inovativno rešitev iz oddelka 4.1, vlagatelj navede odstopanje od ustreznih določb TSI in jih predloži Komisiji.
The appropriate functional and interface specifications and the assessment methods so produced shall then be incorporated in the TSI by the revision process.
Ustrezne funkcionalne specifikacije in specifikacije vmesnikov ter metode ocenjevanja, ki se tako izdelajo, se s postopkom revizije vključijo v TSI.
Assessment of structure gauge
Ocena svetlega profila proge
Assessment of structure gauge is to be made using the results of calculations made by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of Chapters 5, 7, 10 and Annex C of EN 15273-3:2009.
Ocena svetlega profila proge se opravi z uporabo rezultatov izračunov, ki jih izdela upravljavec infrastrukture ali naročnik na podlagi poglavij 5, 7, 10 in Priloge C k EN 15273-3:2009.
Assessment of distance between track centres
Ocena medtirne razdalje
Assessment of the distance between track centres is to be made using the results of calculations made by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of Chapter 9 of EN 15273-3:2009.
Ocena medtirne razdalje se opravi z uporabo rezultatov izračunov, ki jih izdela upravljavec infrastrukture ali naročnik na podlagi poglavja 9 EN 15273-3:2009.
Assessment of cant deficiency
Ocena primanjkljaja nadvišanja
Section 4.2.5.4.1 states that ‘It is permissible for trains specifically designed to travel with higher cant deficiency (multiple units with lower axle loads; trains equipped with a cant deficiency compensation system) to run with higher cant deficiency values, subject to a demonstration that this can be achieved safely’.
Oddelek 4.2.5.4.1 navaja: „Za vlake, posebej namenjene za vožnjo z večjim primanjkljajem nadvišanja (členkaste enot z manjšimi osnimi obremenitvami, vlaki, opremljeni s sistemom za kompenzacijo primanjkljaj nadvišanja), je dovoljena vožnja z večjimi vrednostmi primanjkljaja nadvišanja ob dokazilu, da se to lahko doseže na varen način.“
The demonstration of safety is not subject to a notified body verification.
Priglašeni organ ne verificira dokazila o varnosti.
Assessment of design values for equivalent conicity
Ocena projektnih vrednosti za ekvivalentno koničnost
Assessment of design values for equivalent conicity is to be made using the results of calculations made by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of EN 15302:2008.
Ocena projektnih vrednosti za ekvivalentno koničnost se opravi z uporabo rezultatov izračunov, ki jih izdela upravljavec infrastrukture ali naročnik na podlagi EN 15302:2008.
Assessment of minimum value of mean track gauge
Ocena najnižje srednje vrednosti tirne širine
The measurement method for track gauge is given in Section 4.2.1 of EN 13848-1:2003 + A1:2008.
Merilna metoda za tirno širino je navedena v oddelku 4.2.1 EN 13848 - 1:2003 + A1:2008.
Assessment of maximum pressure variations in tunnels
Ocena največjih sprememb tlaka v predorih
Assessment of maximum pressure variation in the tunnel (10 kPa criterion) is to be made using the results of calculations made by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of all operational conditions with all the trains complying with the high speed and conventional rail rolling stock TSI and intended to run at speeds of greater than 190 km/h in the specific tunnel to be assessed.
Ocena največje spremembe tlaka v predoru (merilo 10 kPa) se opravi z uporabo rezultatov izračunov, ki jih izdela upravljavec infrastrukture ali naročnik na podlagi vseh obratovalnih pogojev pri vseh vlakih, ki ustrezajo TSI za železniški vozni park za visoke hitrosti in konvencionalne hitrosti ter so predvideni za vožnjo s hitrostmi, ki presegajo 190 km/h, v predoru, ki se ocenjuje.
The input parameters to be used are to be such that the reference characteristic pressure signature of the trains set out in the HS rolling stock TSI is fulfilled.
Uporabljeni vhodni parametri morajo biti taki, da izpolnjujejo referenčno oznako značilnega tlaka vlakov, opredeljeno v TSI za železniški vozni park HS.
The reference cross section areas of the interoperable trains to be considered is to be, independently to each motor or trailer vehicle:
Referenčne prečne površine prerezov interoperabilnih vlakov, ki jih je treba upoštevati, morajo neodvisno za vsako motorno ali vlečno enoto znašati:
12 m2 for vehicles designed for GC reference kinematic profile,
12 m2 za vozila, projektirana za referenčni kinematični profil GC,
11 m2 for vehicles designed for GB reference kinematic profile,
11 m2 za vozila, projektirana za referenčni kinematični profil GB,
The assessment may take into account the construction features which reduce the pressure variation (tunnel entrance shape, shafts, etc.) if any, as well as the tunnel length.
Ocena lahko upošteva konstrukcijske značilnosti, ki zmanjšajo spremembe tlaka (oblika vhoda v predor, jaški itd.), če te obstajajo, poleg tega pa tudi dolžino predora.
Assessment of geometry of switches and crossings
Ocena geometrije kretnic in križišč v obratovanju
Assessment of switches and crossings at the design phase is required to verify that the design values used are consistent with the in-service limiting values set out in Section 4.2.6.2.
Ocena kretnic in križišč v fazi projektiranja se zahteva za preveritev ali so uporabljene projektirane vrednosti v skladu z dopustnimi vrednostmi med obratovanjem iz oddelka 4.2.6.2.
Assessment of fixed obtuse crossings at the design phase is also required to verify that the requirements for unguided length in Section 4.2.6.3 are met.
Ocena navadnih dvojnih src v fazi projektiranja se prav tako zahteva zaradi preveritve, ali so izpolnjene zahteve za nevodeno dolžino v oddelku 4.2.6.3.
Assessment of new structures
Ocena novih konstrukcij
Assessment of structures is to be made by only checking the traffic loads used for design against the minimum requirements of 4.2.8.1, 4.2.8.2 and 4.2.8.3.
Ocena konstrukcij se opravi samo s preveritvijo prometnih obremenitev, uporabljenih za projektiranje, v primerjavi z minimalnimi zahtevami iz določb 4.2.8.1, 4.2.8.2 in 4.2.8.3.
The notified body is not required to review the design nor carry out any calculations.
Od priglašenega organa se ne zahteva niti pregled projekta ne izdelava kakršnih koli izračunov.
When reviewing the value of alpha used in the design according to 4.2.8.1 and 4.2.8.2 it is only necessary to check that the value of alpha satisfies Table 6.
Pri pregledu vrednosti alfa, uporabljene pri projektiranju v skladu z določbama 4.2.8.1 in 4.2.8.2, je treba samo preveriti, ali vrednost alfa ustreza preglednici 6.
Assessment of existing structures
Ocena obstoječih konstrukcij
Assessment of existing structures is to be made by checking that the values of EN line categories (and if relevant locomotive classes) in combination with the permitted speed published by the infrastructure manager for the lines containing the structures satisfy the requirements of Annex E of this TSI.
Oceno obstoječih konstrukcij je treba opraviti s preveritvijo, ali vrednosti kategorij proge EN (in razredov lokomotiv, če je potrebno) v kombinaciji z dovoljeno hitrostjo, ki jih je objavil upravljavec infrastrukture za proge, ki vključujejo konstrukcije, ustrezajo zahtevam iz Priloge E k tej TSI.
Assessment of fixed installations for servicing trains
Ocena stabilnih naprav za servisiranje vlakov
Assessment of fixed installations for servicing trains is in the responsibility of the Member State concerned.
Za oceno stabilnih naprav za servisiranje vlakov je odgovorna zadevna država članica.
Assessment of track resistance for plain line
Ocena nosilnosti tira na odprti progi
Plain line ballasted track conforming to the following characteristics is deemed to have met the requirements set out in Section 4.2.7 related to track resistance to longitudinal, vertical and lateral forces:
Za tir s tirno gredo na odprti progi, ki ustreza naslednjim značilnostim, velja, da izpolnjuje zahteve iz oddelka 4.2.7 v zvezi z uporom tira na vzdolžne, vertikalne in bočne sile:
The requirements for track components, defined in Chapter 5 ‘Interoperability constituents’ for the rail (5.3.1), rail fastening systems (5.3.2) and sleepers (5.3.3) interoperability constituents are met;
izpolnjene so zahteve v zvezi s komponentami interoperabilnosti za sestavne dele tira iz poglavja 5 „Komponente interoperabilnosti“ za tirnice (5.3.1), pritrdilni sistem (5.3.2) in pragove (5.3.3);
There are at least 1500 rail fastenings per rail, per kilometre length.
na kilometer dolžine je vsaj 1500 kosov pritrdilnega sistema na tirnico..
Assessment of track resistance for switches and crossings
Ocena nosilnosti tira pri kretnicah in križiščih
Switches and crossings in ballasted track conforming to the following characteristics are deemed to have met the requirements set out in Section 4.2.7 related to track resistance to longitudinal, vertical and lateral forces:
Za kretnice in križišča v tiru s tirno gredo, ki ustrezajo naslednjim značilnostim, velja, da izpolnjujejo zahteve iz oddelka 4.2.7 v zvezi z uporom tira na vzdolžne, vertikalne in bočne sile:
The requirements defined in Chapter 5 ‘Interoperability constituents’ for the rail (5.3.1) are met for the plain rails in the switches and crossings and corresponding switch rails and crossings are used;
Če tirnice izpolnjujejo zahteve, opredeljene v poglavju 5 „Komponente interoperabilnosti“ za tirnice (5.3.1), se lahko uporabljajo tudi kot ustrezne tirnice v kretnicah in križiščih;
The requirements defined in Chapter 5 ‘Interoperability constituents’ for rail fastening systems (5.3.2) are met by all fastenings, other than fastenings used at movable parts of switches and crossings;
Ves pritrdilni sistem, razen pritrdilnih sistemov, ki se uporabljajo na premičnih delih kretnic in križišč, izpolnjuje zahteve, opredeljene v poglavju 5 „Komponente interoperabilnosti“ za pritrdilni sistem(5.3.2);
There are at least equivalent to 1500 rail fastenings per rail, per kilometre length averaged over the length of the switches and crossings.
na dolžini kretnic in križišč, preračunani na kilometer tirnice, je v povprečju vsaj toliko pritrdilnega sistema, da ustreza 1500 kosom pritrdilnega sistema na kilometer tirnice.
Section 7.4 permits a line to be put into service at a lower speed than the ultimate intended speed.
Oddelek 7.4 dopušča začetek obratovanja proge pri hitrosti, ki je nižja od najvišje predvidene hitrosti.
This section sets out requirements for EC verification in this circumstance.
Ta oddelek določa zahteve za ES-verifikacijo v tem primeru.
Some limiting values set out in Chapter 4 depend on the intended speed of the route.
Nekatere mejne vrednosti, določene v poglavju 4, so odvisne od predvidene hitrosti proge.
Conformity should be assessed at the intended ultimate speed; however it is permissible to assess speed dependant characteristics at the lower speed at the time of placing in service.
Skladnost je treba oceniti pri najvišji predvideni hitrosti, vendar je v času predaje proge v obratovanje dovoljeno oceniti značilnosti, ki so odvisne od hitrosti, pri nižji hitrosti.
The conformity of the other characteristics for the intended speed of the route remains valid.
Skladnost drugih značilnosti za predvideno hitrost proge ostaja v veljavi.
To declare the interoperability at this intended speed, it is only necessary to assess the conformity of the characteristics temporarily not respected, when they are brought up to the required level.
Za navedbo interoperabilnosti pri tej predvideni hitrosti je treba skladnost značilnosti, ki začasno niso upoštevane, oceniti šele, ko dosežejo zahtevano raven.
Section 4.5 requires the infrastructure manager to have for each conventional line a maintenance plan for the infrastructure subsystem.
Poglavje 4.5 zahteva od upravljavca infrastrukture, da ima za vsako progo za konvencionalne hitrosti načrt vzdrževanja za infrastrukturni podsistem.
The notified body shall confirm that the maintenance file exists and contains the items listed in Section 4.5.1.
Priglašeni organ potrdi, da dokumentacija o vzdrževanju obstaja in vsebuje postavke, naštete v oddelku 4.5.1.
The notified body is not responsible for assessing the suitability of the detailed requirements set out in the maintenance file.
Priglašeni organ ni odgovoren za ocenjevanje primernosti podrobnih zahtev, določenih v dokumentaciji o vzdrževanju.
The notified body shall include copy of the maintenance file required by Section 4.5.1 of this TSI in the technical file referred to in Article 18(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC.
Priglašeni organ vključi kopijo dokumentacije o vzdrževanju, ki jo zahteva oddelek 4.5.1 te TSI, v tehnično dokumentacijo, navedeno v členu 18(3) Direktive 2008/57/ES.
Section 4.8 requires that the Register of Infrastructure shall indicate the main features of the infrastructure subsystem.
Oddelek 4.8 zahteva, da register železniške infrastrukture navede glavne lastnosti infrastrukturnega podsistema.
The notified body is responsible for assessing that those features have been prepared for the Register of Infrastructure.
Priglašeni organ je odgovoren za oceno, ali so te lastnosti pripravljene za register železniške infrastrukture.
During the transition period provided for in Article 6 of this Decision, a notified body is permitted to issue an EC certificate of verification for a subsystem even if some of the interoperability constituents incorporated within the subsystem are not covered by the relevant EC declarations of conformity and/or suitability for use according to this TSI, if the following criteria are complied with:
V prehodnem obdobju, predvidenem v členu 6 te odločbe, lahko priglašeni organ izda ES-certifikat o verifikaciji za podsistem, čeprav nekatere komponente interoperabilnosti, ki so vgrajene v podsistem, nimajo ustreznih ES-izjav o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo v skladu s to TSI, če so izpolnjena naslednja merila:
the conformity of the subsystem has been checked against the requirements of Chapter 4 and in relation to Chapters 6.2 to 7 (except 7.6. ‘Specific cases’) of this TSI by the notified body.
Priglašeni organ je preveril skladnost podsistema glede zahtev iz poglavja 4 in v zvezi s poglavji 6.2 do 7 (razen 7.6 „Posebni primeri“) te TSI.
Furthermore the conformity of the ICs to Chapter 5 and 6.1 does not apply, and
Razen tega ne velja skladnost IC s poglavji 5 in 6.1 ter
EC declarations of conformity and/or suitability for use shall not be drawn up for the interoperability constituents assessed in this manner.
ES-izjave o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo se ne sestavijo za komponente interoperabilnosti, ki so bile ocenjene na ta način.
The EC certificate of verification of the subsystem shall indicate clearly which interoperability constituents have been assessed by the notified body as part of the subsystem verification.
V ES-certifikatu o verifikaciji podsistema se jasno navede, katere komponente interoperabilnosti je priglašeni organ ocenil v okviru verifikacije podsistema.
The EC declaration of verification of the subsystem shall indicate clearly:
V ES-izjavi o verifikaciji podsistema se jasno navede:
Confirmation that the subsystem contains the interoperability constituents identical to those verified as part of the subsystem;
potrditev, da podsistem vsebuje komponente interoperabilnosti, enake tistim, ki so bile verificirane kot del podsistema;
For those interoperability constituents, the reason(s) why the manufacturer did not provide an EC Declaration of conformity and/or suitability for use before its incorporation into the subsystem, including the application of national rules notified under Article 17 of Directive 2008/57/EC.
razlog(-e), zakaj proizvajalec za te komponente interoperabilnosti ni zagotovil ES-izjave o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo, preden jih je vgradil v podsistem, vključno z uporabo nacionalnih predpisov, priglašenih v skladu s členom 17 Direktive 2008/57/ES.
During the transition period as well as after the transition period has ended, until the subsystem is upgraded or renewed (taking into account the decision of Member State on application of TSIs), the interoperability constituents which do not hold an EC Declaration of conformity and/or suitability for use and of the same type are permitted to be used as maintenance related replacements (spare parts) for the subsystem, under the responsibility of the body responsible for maintenance.
V prehodnem obdobju in tudi po končanem prehodnem obdobju, do nadgradnje ali obnove podsistema (ob upoštevanju odločitve države članice o uporabi TSI), se lahko komponente interoperabilnosti brez ES-izjave o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo in komponente iste vrste uporabljajo za zamenjave, povezane z vzdrževanjem (rezervni deli), za podsistem, za katerega odgovarja organ, pristojen za vzdrževanje.
In any case the body responsible for maintenance must ensure that the components for maintenance related replacements are suitable for their applications, are used within their area of use, and enable interoperability to be achieved within the rail system while at the same time meeting the essential requirements.
V vsakem primeru mora organ, pristojen za vzdrževanje, zagotoviti, da so sestavni deli za zamenjave, povezane z vzdrževanjem, primerni za njihovo uporabo, se uporabljajo v njihovem območju uporabe in omogočajo doseganje interoperabilnosti v železniškem sistemu ter istočasno izpolnjujejo bistvene zahteve.
Such components must be traceable and certified in accordance with any national or international rule, or any code of practice widely acknowledged in the railway domain.
Taki sestavni deli morajo biti sledljivi in potrjeni v skladu s katerim koli nacionalnim ali mednarodnim predpisom ali širše priznanimi pravili prakse na področju železnic.
Chapters 4 to 6 and any specific provisions in Sections 7.2 to 7.6 below apply in full to the lines coming within the geographical scope of this TSI which will be put into service as interoperable lines after this TSI enters into force.
Poglavja 4 do 6 in vse posebne določbe v oddelkih 7.2–7.6 v nadaljevanju v celoti veljajo za proge, zajete v geografsko območje uporabe te TSI, ki bodo začele obratovati kot interoperabilne proge po začetku veljavnosti te TSI.
The Member States shall develop a national migration strategy which specifies for TEN lines those elements of the infrastructure subsystem, which are required for interoperable services (e.g. tracks, sidings, stations, marshalling yards) and therefore need to comply with this TSI.
Države članice pripravijo nacionalno strategijo prehoda, ki za proge TEN določa tiste elemente infrastrukturnega podsistema, ki se zahtevajo za interoperabilne storitve (npr. tiri, stranski tiri, postaje, ranžirne postaje), in morajo zato ustrezati tej TSI.
This migration strategy shall include plans related to renewal and upgrading.
Nacionalna strategija vključuje načrte glede obnove in nadgradnje.
In specifying those elements the Member States shall consider the coherence of the system as a whole.
Pri določanju teh elementov države članice upoštevajo skladnost sistema kot celote.
New core TEN lines (type IV) shall satisfy the requirements of TSI category of line IV-P, IV-F or IV-M.
Nove ključne proge TEN (vrste IV) izpolnjujejo zahteve TSI kategorizacije za kategorije IV-P, IV-F ali IV-M.
New other TEN lines (type VI) shall satisfy the requirements of TSI category of line VI-P, VI-F or VI-M.
Druge nove proge TEN (vrste VI) izpolnjujejo zahteve TSI kategorizacije za kategorije VI-P, VI-F ali VI-M.
It is also permissible for the line to satisfy the requirements of TSI category of line IV-P, IV-F or IV-M respectively.
Dovoljeno je tudi, da proga izpolnjuje zahteve TSI kategorizacije za kategorije IV-P, IV-F oziroma IV-M.
For the purpose of this TSI a ‘new line’ means a line that creates a route where none currently exists.
Za namen te TSI „nova proga“ pomeni progo, ki ustvari smer, ki še ne obstaja.