natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Given that this Directive deals with situations in which the protected person moves to another Member State, issuing or executing a European protection order should not imply any transfer to the executing State of powers relating to principal, suspended, alternative, conditional or secondary penalties, or relating to security measures imposed on the person causing danger, if the latter continues to reside in the State that adopted the protection measure.
Ker so v tej direktivi obravnavani primeri, v katerih se zaščitena oseba preseli v drugo državo članico, izdajanje ali izvrševanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti ne bi smelo pomeniti, da se na državo izvršitve prenesejo kakšne koli pristojnosti, povezane z glavnimi, odloženimi, alternativnimi, pogojnimi ali sekundarnimi sankcijami ali v zvezi z varnostnimi ukrepi, odrejenimi zoper osebo, ki povzroča nevarnost, če ta še naprej prebiva v državi, ki je sprejela zaščitni ukrep.
Where appropriate, it should be possible to use electronic means with a view to putting into practice the measures adopted in application of this Directive, in accordance with national laws and procedures.
Kjer je to primerno bi moralo biti možno ukrepe, sprejete pri uporabi te direktive, v praksi uveljaviti z uporabo elektronskih sredstev, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in postopki.
In the context of cooperation among the authorities involved in ensuring the protection of the protected person, the competent authority of the executing State should communicate to the competent authority of the issuing State any breach of the measures adopted in the executing State with a view to executing the European protection order.
V okviru sodelovanja med organi, vključenimi v zagotavljanje zaščite zaščitene osebe, bi moral pristojni organ države izvršitve pristojnemu organu države izdaje sporočiti vsakršno kršitev ukrepov, sprejetih v državi izvršitve z namenom izvrševanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
This communication should enable the competent authority of the issuing State to promptly decide on any appropriate response with respect to the protection measure imposed in its State on the person causing danger.
To sporočilo bi moralo pristojnemu organu države izdaje omogočiti, da se nemudoma odloči za kakršen koli ustrezen odziv glede zaščitnega ukrepa, izrečenega zoper osebo, ki povzroča nevarnost, v njegovi državi.
Such a response may comprise, where appropriate, the imposition of a custodial measure in substitution of the non-custodial measure that was originally adopted, for example, as an alternative to preventive detention or as a consequence of the conditional suspension of a penalty.
Takšen odziv lahko, kjer je to primerno, vključuje izrek ukrepa odvzema prostosti kot nadomestitev prvotno sprejetega ukrepa brez odvzema prostosti, na primer kot alternativo preventivnemu priporu ali kot posledico pogojne odložitve sankcije.
It is understood that such a decision, since it does not impose ex novo a penalty in relation to a new criminal offence, does not interfere with the possibility that the executing State may, where applicable, impose penalties in the event of a breach of the measures adopted in order to execute the European protection order.
Ker takšna odločitev ne pomeni izreka nove sankcije v povezavi z novim kaznivim dejanjem, se razume, da takšna odločitev ne posega v možnost države izvršitve, da v primeru kršitve ukrepov, sprejetih zaradi izvrševanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti, po potrebi, izreče sankcije.
In view of the different legal traditions of the Member States, where no protection measure would be available in the executing State in a case similar to the factual situation described in the European protection order, the competent authority of the executing State should report any breach of the protection measure described in the European protection order of which it is aware to the competent authority of the issuing State.
Zaradi različnih pravnih tradicij držav članic bi moral pristojni organ države izvršitve v primeru, če v tej državi ne bi bilo na voljo nobenega zaščitnega ukrepa glede na dejansko stanje, opisano v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, poročati pristojnemu organu države izdaje o vsaki kršitvi zaščitnega ukrepa, opisanega v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, s katero je seznanjen.
In order to ensure the smooth application of this Directive in each particular case, the competent authorities of the issuing and the executing States should exercise their competencies in accordance with the provisions of this Directive, taking into account the principle of ne bis in idem.
Za zagotavljanje nemotene uporabe te direktive v vsakem posameznem primeru, bi morali pristojni organi države izdaje in države izvršitve svoje pristojnosti izvajati v skladu z določbami te direktive in ob upoštevanju načela ne bis in idem.
The protected person should not be required to sustain costs related to the recognition of the European protection order which are disproportionate to a similar national case.
Zaščitena oseba ne bi smela biti dolžna kriti stroškov v zvezi s priznanjem evropske odredbe o zaščiti, ki so nesorazmerni v primerjavi s podobnim nacionalnim primerom.
When implementing this Directive, Member States should ensure that, after recognition of the European protection order, the protected person is not required to initiate further national proceedings to obtain from the competent authority of the executing State, as a direct consequence of the recognition of the European protection order, a decision adopting any measure that would be available under its national law in a similar case in order to ensure the protection of the protected person.
Države članice bi morale pri izvajanju te direktive zagotoviti, da po priznanju evropske odredbe o zaščiti zaščitena oseba ni dolžna začeti nadaljnjih nacionalnih postopkov, da bi od pristojnega organa države izvršitve, kot neposredno posledico priznanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti, pridobila odločbo o sprejetju kakršnega koli ukrepa, ki bi bil v skladu z nacionalnim pravom te države na voljo v podobnem primeru za zagotavljanje zaščite zaščitene osebe.
Bearing in mind the principle of mutual recognition upon which this Directive is based, Member States should promote, to the widest extent possible, direct contact between the competent authorities when they apply this Directive.
Ob upoštevanju načela vzajemnega priznavanja, na katerem temelji ta direktiva, bi morale države članice v največji možni meri spodbujati neposredne stike med pristojnimi organi, kadar ti uporabljajo to direktivo.
Without prejudice to judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Union, Member States should consider requesting those responsible for the training of judges, prosecutors, police and judicial staff involved in the procedures aimed at issuing or recognising a European protection order to provide appropriate training with respect to the objectives of this Directive.
Brez poseganja v neodvisnost sodstva in v razlike v organiziranosti pravosodja v Uniji bi morale države članice razmisliti o tem, da odgovorne za usposabljanje sodnikov, tožilcev ter zaposlenih na policiji in v pravosodju, ki sodelujejo v postopkih za izdajo ali priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, zaprosijo, da se zagotovi ustrezno usposabljanje v zvezi s cilji te direktive.
In order to facilitate the evaluation of the application of this Directive, Member States should communicate to the Commission relevant data related to the application of national procedures on the European protection order, at least with regard to the number of European protection orders requested, issued and/or recognised.
Države članice bi morale Komisiji sporočiti ustrezne podatke o uporabi nacionalnih postopkov v zvezi z evropsko odredbo o zaščiti, vsaj glede števila zaprošenih, izdanih in/ali priznanih evropskih odredb o zaščiti, da bi tako pripomogle k lažji oceni uporabe te direktive.
In this respect, other types of data, such as, for example, the types of crimes concerned, would also be useful.
Pri tem bi bile koristne tudi druge vrste podatkov, kot so na primer vrsta zadevnih kaznivih dejanj.
This Directive should contribute to the protection of persons who are in danger, thereby complementing, but not affecting, the instruments already in place in this field, such as Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA and Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA.
Ta direktiva bi morala prispevati k zaščiti oseb, ki so v nevarnosti, ter brez poseganja vanje dopolnjevati instrumente, ki so že vzpostavljeni na tem področju, kot sta Okvirni sklep 2008/947/PNZ in Okvirni sklep 2009/829/PNZ, pri tem pa ne posegati vanje.
When a decision relating to a protection measure falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [5], Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility [6], or the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children [7], the recognition and enforcement of that decision should be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the relevant legal instrument.
Če spada odločba v zvezi z zaščitnim ukrepom v področje uporabe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [5], Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 z dne 27. novembra 2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo [6] ali Haaške konvencije iz leta 1996 o pristojnosti, veljavni zakonodaji, priznanju, izvrševanju in sodelovanju v zvezi z odgovornostjo staršev in ukrepih za varstvo otrok [7], bi bilo treba priznavanje in izvrševanje takšne odločbe izvajati v skladu z določbami ustreznega pravnega instrumenta.
Member States and the Commission should include information about the European protection order, where it is appropriate, in existing education and awareness-raising campaigns on the protection of victims of crime.
Države članice in Komisija bi morale po potrebi informacije o evropski odredbi o zaščiti vključiti v obstoječe kampanje za izobraževanje in ozaveščanje o zaščiti žrtev kaznivih dejanj.
Personal data processed when implementing this Directive should be protected in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters [8] and with the principles laid down in the 1981 Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data.
Osebni podatki, ki se obdelujejo pri izvajanju te direktive, bi morali biti varovani v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah [8], in načeli, določenimi v Konvenciji Sveta Evrope iz leta 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov.
This Directive should respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in accordance with Article 6 TEU.
Ta direktiva bi morala v skladu s členom 6 PEU spoštovati temeljne pravice, ki jih zagotavljata Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah ter Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
When implementing this Directive, Member States are encouraged to take into account the rights and principles enshrined in the 1979 United Nations Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women.
Države članice se spodbuja, da pri izvajanju te direktive upoštevajo pravice in načela iz Konvencije Združenih narodov iz leta 1979 o odpravi vseh oblik diskriminacije žensk.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to protect persons who are in danger, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU.
Ker cilja te direktive, namreč zaščititi ogrožene osebe, države članice same ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the United Kingdom has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Directive.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, je Združeno kraljestvo podalo uradno obvestilo, da želi sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te direktive.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, Ireland is not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola, Irska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
This Directive sets out rules allowing a judicial or equivalent authority in a Member State, in which a protection measure has been adopted with a view to protecting a person against a criminal act by another person which may endanger his life, physical or psychological integrity, dignity, personal liberty or sexual integrity, to issue a European protection order enabling a competent authority in another Member State to continue the protection of the person in the territory of that other Member State, following criminal conduct, or alleged criminal conduct, in accordance with the national law of the issuing State.
Ta direktiva določa pravila, ki pravosodnemu ali enakovrednemu organu države članice, v kateri je bil sprejet zaščitni ukrep z namenom, da se oseba zaščiti pred kaznivim dejanjem druge osebe, ki lahko ogrozi njeno življenje, telesno ali duševno celovitost, dostojanstvo, osebno svobodo ali spolno nedotakljivost, dovoljujejo, da izda evropsko odredbo o zaščiti, ki pristojnemu organu v drugi državi članici omogoča kontinuirano zaščito osebe na ozemlju te druge države članice v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdaje po izvršitvi ali domnevni izvršitvi kaznivega dejanja.
‘European protection order’ means a decision, taken by a judicial or equivalent authority of a Member State in relation to a protection measure, on the basis of which a judicial or equivalent authority of another Member State takes any appropriate measure or measures under its own national law with a view to continuing the protection of the protected person;
„evropska odredba o zaščiti“ pomeni odločbo, ki jo sprejme pravosodni ali enakovredni organ države članice v zvezi z zaščitnim ukrepom in na podlagi katere pravosodni ali enakovredni organ druge države članice v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo sprejme ustrezen ukrep ali ukrepe za kontinuirano varstvo zaščitene osebe;
‘protection measure’ means a decision in criminal matters adopted in the issuing State in accordance with its national law and procedures by which one or more of the prohibitions or restrictions referred to in Article 5 are imposed on a person causing danger in order to protect a protected person against a criminal act which may endanger his life, physical or psychological integrity, dignity, personal liberty or sexual integrity;
„zaščitni ukrep“ pomeni odločbo v kazenski zadevi, sprejeto v državi izdaje v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in postopki, ki osebi, ki povzroča nevarnost, izreka eno ali več prepovedi ali omejitev iz člena 5 za zaščito zaščitene osebe pred kaznivim dejanjem, ki lahko ogrozi njeno življenje, telesno ali duševno celovitost, dostojanstvo, osebno svobodo ali spolno nedotakljivost;
‘protected person’ means a natural person who is the object of the protection resulting from a protection measure adopted by the issuing State;
„zaščitena oseba“ pomeni fizično osebo, ki je zaščitena na podlagi zaščitnega ukrepa, sprejetega v državi izdaje;
‘person causing danger’ means the natural person on whom one or more of the prohibitions or restrictions referred to in Article 5 have been imposed;
„oseba, ki povzroča nevarnost“ pomeni fizično osebo, ki ji je izrečena ena ali več prepovedi ali omejitev iz člena 5;
‘issuing State’ means the Member State in which a protection measure has been adopted that constitutes the basis for issuing a European protection order;
„država izdaje“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri je bil sprejet zaščitni ukrep, na podlagi katerega se izda evropska odredba o zaščiti;
‘executing State’ means the Member State to which a European protection order has been forwarded with a view to its recognition;
„država izvršitve“ pomeni državo članico, ki ji je bila posredovana evropska odredba o zaščiti z namenom, da bi to odredbo priznala;
‘State of supervision’ means the Member State to which a judgment within the meaning of Article 2 of Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, or a decision on supervision measures within the meaning of Article 4 of Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, has been transferred.
„država nadzora“ pomeni državo članico, ki ji je bila posredovana sodba v smislu člena 2 Okvirnega sklepa 2008/947/PNZ, ali odločba o nadzornih ukrepih v smislu člena 4 Okvirnega sklepa 2009/829/PNZ.
Each Member State shall inform the Commission which judicial or equivalent authority or authorities are competent under its national law to issue a European protection order and to recognise such an order, in accordance with this Directive, when that Member State is the issuing State or the executing State.
Vsaka država članica, obvesti Komisijo o pravosodnem ali enakovrednem organu oziroma organih, ki so po nacionalnem pravu te države pristojni, da v skladu s to direktivo izdajo in priznajo evropsko odredbo o zaščiti, kadar je ta država izdaje ali država izvršitve.
The Commission shall make the information received available to all Member States.
Komisija da prejete informacije na voljo vsem državam članicam.
Member States shall inform the Commission of any change to the information referred to in paragraph 1.
Države članice Komisijo obvestijo o kakršnih koli spremembah informacij iz odstavka 1.
Recourse to a central authority
Udeležba centralnega organa
Each Member State may designate a central authority or, where its legal system so provides, more than one central authority, to assist its competent authorities.
Vsaka država članica lahko določi centralni organ ali, če tako določa njen pravni sistem, več centralnih organov za pomoč njenim pristojnim organom.
A Member State may, if it is necessary as a result of the organisation of its internal judicial system, make its central authority or authorities responsible for the administrative transmission and reception of any European protection order, as well as for all other official correspondence relating thereto.
Država članica lahko, če je to potrebno zaradi organiziranosti njenega notranjega pravosodnega sistema, sklene, da bo njen centralni organ oziroma organi odgovorni za administrativno pošiljanje in prejemanje evropskih odredb o zaščiti in za vso s tem povezano uradno korespondenco.
As a consequence, all communications, consultations, exchanges of information, enquiries and notifications between competent authorities may be dealt with, where appropriate, with the assistance of the designated central authority or authorities of the Member State concerned.
Kjer je to primerno lahko tako centralni organ oziroma organi zadevne države članice sodelujejo pri vsej komunikaciji, posvetovanjih, izmenjavi informacij, poizvedbah in uradnih obvestilih med pristojnimi organi.
Member States wishing to make use of the possibilities referred to in this Article shall communicate to the Commission information relating to the designated central authority or authorities.
Države članice, ki želijo uporabiti možnosti iz tega člena, Komisiji posredujejo podatke o določitvi centralnega organa oziroma organov.
These indications shall be binding upon all the authorities of the issuing State.
Te navedbe so zavezujoče za vse organe države izdaje.
Need for an existing protection measure under national law
Potreba po zaščitnem ukrepu v skladu z nacionalnim pravom
A European protection order may only be issued when a protection measure has been previously adopted in the issuing State, imposing on the person causing danger one or more of the following prohibitions or restrictions:
Evropska odredba o zaščiti se lahko izda le, če je država izdaje predhodno sprejela zaščitni ukrep, ki zoper osebo, ki povzroča nevarnost, izreka eno ali več naslednjih prepovedi ali omejitev:
a prohibition from entering certain localities, places or defined areas where the protected person resides or visits;
prepoved vstopa na določene kraje, mesta ali opredeljena območja, na katerih zaščitena oseba prebiva ali jih obiskuje
a prohibition or regulation of contact, in any form, with the protected person, including by phone, electronic or ordinary mail, fax or any other means; or
prepoved ali ureditev stikov z zaščiteno osebo v kakršni koli obliki, tudi po telefonu, elektronski ali navadni pošti, faksu ali kako drugače, ali
a prohibition or regulation on approaching the protected person closer than a prescribed distance.
prepoved ali ureditev približevanja zaščiteni osebi na krajšo razdaljo od predpisane.
Issuing of a European protection order
Izdaja evropske odredbe o zaščiti
A European protection order may be issued when the protected person decides to reside or already resides in another Member State, or when the protected person decides to stay or already stays in another Member State.
1. Evropska odredba o zaščiti se lahko izda, če se zaščitena oseba odloči, da bo prebivala v drugi državi članici, ali tam že prebiva ali če se zaščitena oseba odloči, da se bo zadrževala v drugi državi članici, ali se tam že zadržuje.
When deciding upon the issuing of a European protection order, the competent authority in the issuing State shall take into account, inter alia, the length of the period or periods that the protected person intends to stay in the executing State and the seriousness of the need for protection.
Pri odločitvi o izdaji evropske odredbe o zaščiti pristojni organ v državi izdaje med drugim upošteva predvideni čas, ki ga namerava zaščitena oseba prebiti v državi izvršitve, in nujnost potrebe po zaščiti.
A judicial or equivalent authority of the issuing State may issue a European protection order only at the request of the protected person and after verifying that the protection measure meets the requirements set out in Article 5.
Pravosodni ali enakovredni organ države izdaje lahko izda evropsko odredbo o zaščiti le na zaprosilo zaščitene osebe in potem ko preveri, da zaščitni ukrep izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 5.
The protected person may submit a request for the issuing of a European protection order either to the competent authority of the issuing State or to the competent authority of the executing State.
Zaščitena oseba lahko vloži zaprosilo za izdajo evropske odredbe o zaščiti bodisi pri pristojnem organu države izdaje bodisi pri pristojnem organu države izvršitve.