natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Credit institutions must consult their NCBs to ascertain whether these data must be reported.
Kreditne institucije se morajo posvetovati s svojimi NCB, da ugotovijo, ali je te podatke treba poročati.
This item covers both staff-operated and customer-operated machines.
1 Ta postavka zajema tako naprave, ki jih upravljajo zaposleni, kot tudi naprave, ki jih upravljajo stranke.
Euro banknotes that are returned to NCBs, and euro banknotes recirculated over the counter, if the NCB so decides, are excluded.
2 Izvzeti so eurobankovci, ki se vrnejo NCB, in eurobankovci, ki se ponovno dajo v obtok prek okenca, če tako odloči NCB.
REMOTE BRANCHES OF CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
ODDALJENE PODRUŽNICE KREDITNIH INSTITUCIJ
This information is provided only by credit institutions which have remote branches as referred to in Article 7(1).
Te informacije zagotovijo samo kreditne institucije, ki imajo oddaljene podružnice iz člena 7(1).
Credit institution information
Informacije o kreditni instituciji
Credit institution’s name
Ime kreditne institucije
Name of remote branch
Ime oddaljene podružnice
Number of euro banknotes distributed via customer-operated machines and cash dispensers
Število eurobankovcev, izdanih prek naprav, ki jih upravljajo stranke, in prek avtomatov za dvig gotovine
CIMs
Vplačilno-izplačilni avtomati (CRM)
SCoTs
Samopostrežne blagajne (SCoT)
CRMs CCMs
Kombinirani vplačilni avtomati (CCM)
of 6 January 2012
z dne 6. januarja 2012
laying down the rules and procedures related to experts in national accounting assisting the Commission in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community
o določitvi pravil in postopkov v zvezi s strokovnjaki za nacionalne račune, ki Komisiji zagotavljajo pomoč v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 479/2009 o uporabi Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 of 25 May 2009 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community [1], and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 479/2009 z dne 25. maja 2009 o uporabi Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 12(1) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 479/2009 requires the Commission (Eurostat) to assess the quality of data to be used for the excessive deficit procedure (EDP), including in the form of methodological visits.
Uredba (ES) št. 479/2009 določa, da Komisija (Eurostat) ocenjuje kakovost podatkov, ki se uporabljajo pri postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EDP), vključno z metodološkimi obiski.
For the purpose of carrying out such visits, the Commission (Eurostat) could be assisted by experts in national accounting.
Pri izvedbi takih obiskov lahko Komisiji (Eurostatu) pomagajo strokovnjaki za nacionalne račune.
It is necessary to lay down the rules and procedures for selection of the experts, taking into account an appropriate distribution of experts across Member States and an appropriate rotation of experts between Member States, their working arrangements and the financial details,
Določiti je treba pravila in postopke za izbor strokovnjakov ob upoštevanju ustrezne porazdelitve strokovnjakov po državah članicah in ustrezne rotacije strokovnjakov med državami članicami, organizacije njihovega dela in finančnih podrobnosti –
The rules and procedures for selection of experts in national accounting to assist the Commission (Eurostat) in visits to the Member States under Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2009, their working arrangements and the sharing of the costs of such visits between the Commission and the experts’ national authority responsible for excessive deficit procedure reporting are set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Pravila in postopki za izbor strokovnjakov za nacionalne račune, ki Komisiji (Eurostatu) zagotavljajo pomoč pri obiskih v državah članicah v skladu s členom 12(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2009, za organizacijo njihovega dela ter delitev stroškov takih obiskov med Komisijo in nacionalnim organom, ki predlaga strokovnjake in je pristojen za poročanje v okviru postopka čezmernega primanjkljaja, so določeni v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
This Decision shall apply to the assistance referred to in Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 479/2009, provided as from 1 January 2012.
Ta sklep se uporablja za pomoč iz člena 12(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 479/2009 od 1. januarja 2012.
Done at Brussels, 6 January 2012.
V Bruslju, 6. januarja 2012
List of experts in national accounting
Seznam strokovnjakov za nacionalne račune
The Commission (Eurostat) shall maintain the list of experts in national accounting on the basis of proposals sent to it by the national authorities responsible for excessive deficit procedure (EDP) reporting.
Komisija (Eurostat) na podlagi predlogov, ki jih pošljejo nacionalni organi, pristojni za poročanje v okviru postopka čezmernega primanjkljaja, pripravi seznam strokovnjakov za nacionalne račune.
The list shall be updated on a regular basis.
Seznam se redno posodablja.
Definition of experts in national accounting
Opredelitev strokovnjaka za nacionalne račune
Experts in national accounting shall be specialised in EDP reporting and statistics.
Strokovnjaki za nacionalne račune so specializirani za poročanje in statistiko v okviru EDP.
They shall support the Commission EDP experts carrying out visits to a Member State.
Strokovnjakom Komisije za EDP zagotavljajo podporo pri izvedbi obiskov v državi članici.
In this capacity, the experts in national accounting shall provide independent expertise and shall not represent the points of view of their Member State.
V tej vlogi strokovnjaki na področju nacionalnih računov zagotavljajo neodvisno strokovno podporo in ne predstavljajo stališča države članice.
Selection of experts
Izbor strokovnjakov
The Commission (Eurostat) shall select, for the exceptional visits where it is deemed appropriate, one or more national experts to accompany its own experts on the visit.
Komisija (Eurostat) za izjemne obiske po potrebi izbere enega ali več nacionalnih strokovnjakov, ki med obiskom spremljajo njene strokovnjake.
The experts shall be selected from the list in such a manner that the same expert shall not be chosen to carry out a visit more than three times every three years.
Strokovnjaki se izberejo s seznama tako, da posamezni strokovnjak v treh letih pri obiskih sodeluje največ trikrat.
Reimbursement of costs to the national authority responsible for EDP reporting
Povračilo stroškov nacionalnemu organu, pristojnemu za poročanje v okviru EDP
The amount to be paid to reimburse travel expenses, the daily accommodation allowance and the daily flat-rate allowance shall be calculated in accordance with the Commission Decision of 5 December 2007 on the rules on the reimbursement of expenses incurred by people from outside the Commission invited to attend meetings in an expert capacity [1].
Zneski povračila potnih stroškov, dnevnega nadomestila za stroške bivanja in dnevnega pavšalnega nadomestila se izračunajo v skladu s Sklepom Komisije z dne 5. decembra 2007 Predpisi o nadomestilih za zunanje strokovnjake, ki jih Komisija povabi k sodelovanju [1].
Prior to the visit, the accompanying expert shall be required to sign a confidentiality statement concerning the content, timing and practical organisation of the visit.
Pred obiskom spremljevalni strokovnjak podpiše izjavo o zaupnosti v zvezi z vsebino, časom in praktičnimi vidiki organizacije obiska.
on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest
o uporabi člena 106(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljenega nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 106(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 106(3) Pogodbe,
Article 14 of the Treaty requires the Union, without prejudice to Articles 93, 106 and 107 of the Treaty, to use its powers in such a way as to make sure that services of general economic interest operate on the basis of principles and conditions which enable them to fulfil their missions.
Člen 14 Pogodbe določa, da brez poseganja v člene 93, 106 in 107 Pogodbe Unija v mejah svojih pristojnosti skrbi za to, da se storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena opravljajo na podlagi načel in pogojev, ki omogočajo izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog.
For certain services of general economic interest to operate on the basis of principles and under conditions which enable them to fulfil their missions, financial support from the State may prove necessary to cover some or all of the specific costs resulting from the public service obligations.
Za opravljanje nekaterih storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena na podlagi načel in pogojev, ki omogočajo izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog, se lahko izkaže, da je potrebna državna finančna podpora za pokrivanje nekaterih ali vseh posebnih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz obveznosti javnih storitev.
In accordance with Article 345 of the Treaty, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union, it is irrelevant whether such services of general economic interest are operated by public or private undertakings.
V skladu s členom 345 Pogodbe, kakor ga razlaga Sodišče Evropske unije, ni pomembno, ali take storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena opravljajo javna ali zasebna podjetja.
Article 106(2) of the Treaty states in this respect that undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly are subject to the rules contained in the Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of these rules does not obstruct, in law or in fact, the performance of the tasks entrusted.
V zvezi s tem člen 106(2) Pogodbe navaja, da morajo podjetja, pooblaščena za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, oziroma podjetja, ki imajo značaj dohodkovnega monopola, ravnati po pravilih iz Pogodbe, zlasti po pravilih o konkurenci, kolikor uporaba teh pravil pravno ali dejansko ne ovira izvajanja nalog, ki so jim bile zaupane.
This should however not affect the development of trade to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Union.
Vendar to ne vpliva na razvoj trgovine v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju z interesi Unije.
In its judgment in Altmark [1], the Court of Justice held that public service compensation does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107 of the Treaty provided that four cumulative criteria are met.
Sodišče je v svoji sodbi v zadevi Altmark [1], odločilo, da nadomestilo za javne storitve ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 107 Pogodbe, kadar so izpolnjena štiri kumulativna merila.
First, the recipient undertaking must actually have public service obligations to discharge, and the obligations must be clearly defined.
Prvič, podjetje, ki prejema nadomestilo, mora dejansko izpolnjevati obveznosti javne službe, te obveznosti pa morajo biti jasno opredeljene.
Second, the parameters on the basis of which the compensation is calculated must be established in advance in an objective and transparent manner.
Drugič, merila, na podlagi katerih se izračuna nadomestilo, je treba določiti vnaprej na objektiven in pregleden način.
Third, the compensation must not exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of the public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit.
Tretjič, nadomestilo ne sme presegati zneska, potrebnega za pokrivanje vseh ali nekaterih stroškov, ki nastanejo zaradi izpolnjevanja obveznosti javnih storitev, ob upoštevanju ustreznih prejemkov in zmernega dobička.
Finally, where the undertaking that is to discharge public service obligations, in a specific case, is not chosen pursuant to a public procurement procedure which would allow for the selection of the tenderer capable of providing those services at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation needed must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs that a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately provided with the relevant means, would have incurred.
Nazadnje, če podjetje, ki naj bi izpolnjevalo obveznosti javnih storitev, v danem primeru ni izbrano v skladu s postopkom oddaje javnih naročil, ki naj bi omogočil izbiro ponudnika, sposobnega, da te storitve skupnosti zagotovi po najnižjih stroških, je treba stopnjo potrebnega nadomestila določiti na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi nastali v povprečnem, dobro vodenem in ustrezno opremljenem podjetju.
Where those criteria are not fulfilled and the general conditions for the applicability of Article 107(1) of the Treaty are met, public service compensation constitutes State aid and is subject to Articles 93, 106, 107 and 108 of the Treaty.
Če ta merila niso izpolnjena, vendar so izpolnjeni splošni pogoji za uporabo člena 107(1) Pogodbe, nadomestilo za javne storitve pomeni državno pomoč in se zanj uporabljajo členi 93, 106, 107 in 108 Pogodbe.
In addition to this Decision, three instruments are relevant for the application of the State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest:
Poleg tega sklepa so za uporabo pravil o državni pomoči za nadomestila, dodeljena za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, pomembni še trije instrumenti:
a new Communication on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest [2] clarifies the application of Article 107 of the Treaty and the criteria set by the Altmark ruling to such compensation;
novo sporočilo o uporabi pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena [2], je pojasnilo uporabo člena 107 Pogodbe in meril, ki so bila za tako nadomestilo določena v sodbi Altmark;
a new Regulation, which the Commission intends to adopt, on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty to de minimis aid for the provision of SGEI lays down certain conditions – including the amount of the compensation – under which public service compensations shall be deemed not to meet all the criteria of Article 107(1);
nova uredba, ki jo Komisija namerava sprejeti o uporabi členov 107 in 108 Pogodbe za pomoč de minimis za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena določa nekatere pogoje, vključno z zneskom nadomestila, pod katerimi se šteje, da nadomestilo za opravljanje javnih storitev ne izpolnjuje vseh meril iz člena 107(1);
a revised framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation [3] specifies how the Commission will analyse cases that are not covered by this Decision and therefore have to be notified to the Commission.
spremenjeni okvir za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve določa [3], kako bo Komisija proučila zadeve, ki jih ta sklep ne zajema in jih je zato treba priglasiti Komisiji.
Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest [4] specifies the meaning and extent of the exception pursuant to Article 106(2) of the Treaty and sets out rules intended to enable effective monitoring of the fulfilment of the criteria set out in that provision.
Odločba Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena [4], določa pomen in obseg izjeme v skladu s členom 106(2) Pogodbe ter pravila, ki naj bi omogočala učinkovito spremljanje izpolnjevanja meril iz te določbe.
This Decision replaces Decision 2005/842/EC and lays down the conditions under which State aid in the form of compensation for a service of general economic interest is not subject to the prior notification requirement of Article 108(3) of the Treaty as it can be deemed compatible with Article 106(2) of the Treaty.
Ta sklep nadomešča Odločbo 2005/842/ES in določa pogoje, pod katerimi za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ne velja obveznost predhodne priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe, saj se lahko šteje, da je združljiva s členom 106(2) Pogodbe.
Such aid may be deemed compatible only if it is granted in order to ensure the provision of services of general economic interest as referred to in Article 106(2) of the Treaty.
Taka pomoč se lahko šteje za združljivo le, če je dodeljena za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena iz člena 106(2) Pogodbe.
It is clear from the case-law that, in the absence of sectoral Union rules governing the matter, Member States have a wide margin of discretion in the definition of services that could be classified as being services of general economic interest.
Iz sodne prakse izhaja, da imajo države članice visoko stopnjo diskrecije pri uvrščanju storitev med storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, če ni sektorskih pravil na ravni Unije, ki bi urejala zadevno področje.
Thus the Commission’s task is to ensure that there is no manifest error as regards the definition of services of general economic interest.
Naloga Komisije je torej zagotoviti, da se pri opredelitvah storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena ne pojavljajo očitne napake.
Provided a number of conditions are met, limited amounts of compensation granted to undertakings entrusted with the provision of services of general economic interest do not affect the development of trade and competition to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Union.
Če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji, omejeni zneski nadomestila, dodeljenega podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ne vplivajo na razvoj trgovine in konkurence v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju z interesi Unije.
An individual State aid notification should therefore not be required for compensation below a specified annual amount of compensation provided the requirements of this Decision are met.
Posamezna priglasitev državne pomoči zato ni potrebna za nadomestilo, ki je nižje od določenega letnega zneska nadomestila, če so izpolnjene zahteve iz tega sklepa.
Given the development of intra-Union trade in the provision of services of general economic interest, demonstrated for instance by the strong development of multi-national providers in a number of sectors which are of great importance for the development of the internal market, it is appropriate to set a lower limit for the amount of compensation which can be exempted from the notification requirement in accordance with this Decision than what was set by Decision 2005/842/EC, while allowing for that amount to be computed as an annual average over the entrustment period.
Glede na razvoj menjave v Uniji na področju opravljanja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ki se na primer kaže v močnem razvoju večnacionalnih ponudnikov v številnih sektorjih, ki so izredno pomembni za razvoj notranjega trga, je primerno določiti spodnjo mejo zneska nadomestila, ki se lahko izvzame iz obveznosti priglasitve v skladu s tem sklepom niže, kot je bilo določeno z Odločbo Komisije 2005/842/ES, obenem pa omogočiti, da se ta znesek izračuna kot letno povprečje v obdobju pooblastitve.
Hospitals and undertakings in charge of social services, which are entrusted with tasks of general economic interest, have specific characteristics that need to be taken into consideration.
Bolnišnice in podjetja, ki so pooblaščeni za socialne storitve in so jim bile zaupane naloge opravljanja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, imajo posebne značilnosti, ki jih je treba upoštevati.
In particular, account should be taken of the fact that, in the present economic conditions and at the current stage of development of the internal market, social services may require an amount of aid beyond the threshold in this Decision to compensate for the public service costs.
Upoštevati je treba zlasti dejstvo, da je lahko v sedanjih gospodarskih razmerah in na sedanji stopnji razvoja notranjega trga za socialne storitve potrebna pomoč, ki presega prag iz tega sklepa, s katero bi se nadomestili stroški za opravljanje javnih storitev.
A larger amount of compensation for social services does thus not necessarily produce a greater risk of distortions of competition.
Višji znesek nadomestila za socialne storitve tako ne povzroči nujno večjega tveganja za izkrivljanje konkurence.
Accordingly, undertakings in charge of social services, including the provision of social housing for disadvantaged citizens or socially less advantaged groups, who due to solvency constraints are unable to obtain housing at market conditions, should also benefit from the exemption from notification provided for in this Decision, even if the amount of compensation they receive exceeds the general compensation threshold laid down in this Decision.
Zato bi morala biti tudi podjetja, ki so pooblaščena za nekatere socialne storitve, vključno z zagotavljanjem socialnih stanovanj prikrajšanim državljanom ali skupinam z manj socialnimi ugodnostmi, ki si zaradi omejitev plačilne sposobnosti niso sposobni najti stanovanja po tržnih pogojih, izvzeta iz obveznosti priglasitve iz tega sklepa, tudi če znesek nadomestila, ki ga prejmejo, presega splošni prag nadomestila iz tega sklepa.
The same should apply to hospitals providing medical care, including, where applicable, emergency services and ancillary services directly related to their main activities, in particular in the field of research.
Isto bi moralo veljati tudi za bolnišnice, ki zagotavljajo zdravstveno oskrbo, ki po potrebi vključuje storitve v nujnih primerih in pomožne storitve, ki so neposredno povezane z njihovimi glavnimi dejavnostmi, zlasti na področju raziskav.
In order to benefit from the exemption from notification, social services should be clearly identified services, meeting social needs as regards health and long-term care, childcare, access to and reintegration into the labour market, social housing and the care and social inclusion of vulnerable groups.
Da bi se lahko izvzetja iz obveznosti priglasitve koristila, bi bilo treba socialne storitve jasno opredeliti kot storitve, ki izpolnjujejo socialne potrebe glede zdravstvenega in dolgoročnega varstva, otroškega varstva, dostopa do trga dela in vrnitve nanj, socialnih stanovanj ter oskrbe in socialne vključenosti ranljivih skupin.
The extent to which a particular compensation measure affects trade and competition depends not only on the average amount of compensation received per year and the sector concerned, but also on the overall duration of the period of entrustment.
Učinek določenega ukrepa nadomestila na trgovino in konkurenco ni odvisen le od povprečnega zneska nadomestila, prejetega v enem letu, in zadevnega sektorja, temveč tudi od skupnega trajanja obdobja pooblastitve.
Unless a longer period is justified due to the need for a significant investment, for example in the area of social housing, the application of this Decision should therefore be limited to periods of entrustment not exceeding 10 years.
Uporabo tega sklepa je zato treba omejiti na obdobja pooblastitve, ki ne presegajo desetih let, razen če ni daljše obdobje pooblastitve utemeljeno s potrebo po večji naložbi, na primer na področju socialnih stanovanj.