natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission has examined Spain's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Carne De Vacuno Del País Vasco / Euskal Okela’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 [2], as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1483/2004 [3].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 9(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je Komisija proučila vlogo Španije za odobritev sprememb specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Carne De Vacuno Del País Vasco / Euskal Okela“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2400/96 [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1483/2004 [3].
OJ L 273, 21.8.2004, p. 3.
UL L 273, 21.8.2004, str. 3.
OJ C 96, 29.3.2001, p. 13.
UL C 96, 29.3.2001, str. 13.
Carne De Vacuno Del País Vasco/Euskal Okela (PGI)
Carne De Vacuno Del País Vasco/Euskal Okela (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1366/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1366/2011
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Pataca de Galicia / Patata de Galicia (PGI)]
o odobritvi večjih sprememb specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb [Pataca de Galicia / Patata de Galicia (ZGO)]
By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission has examined Spain’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Pataca de Galicia / Patata de Galicia’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 148/2007 [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 9(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je Komisija proučila vlogo Španije za odobritev sprememb specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Pataca de Galicia / Patata de Galicia“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 148/2007 [2].
OJ L 46, 16.2.2007, p. 14.
UL L 46, 16.2.2007, str. 14.
OJ C 108, 7.4.2011, p. 19.
UL C 108, 7.4.2011, str. 19.
Pataca de Galicia/Patata de Galicia (PGI)
Pataca de Galicia/Patata de Galicia (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1367/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1367/2011
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Figue de Solliès (PDO)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb [Figue de Solliès (ZOP)]
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France's application to register the name 'Figue de Solliès' was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Francije za registracijo imena „Figue de Solliès“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
OJ C 119, 16.4.2011, p. 15.
UL C 119, 16.4.2011, str. 15.
Figue de Solliès (PDO)
Figue de Solliès (ZOP)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1368/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1368/2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards the support schemes for farmers provided for in Titles IV and V thereof, and Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system, under the direct support schemes for farmers provided for in that Regulation, as well as for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards cross-compliance under the support scheme provided for the wine sector
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1121/2009 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 v zvezi s shemami podpor za kmete iz naslovov IV in V Uredbe ter Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo, modulacijo ter integriranim administrativnim in kontrolnim sistemom v okviru shem neposrednih podpor za kmete, določenih z navedeno uredbo, ter za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo v okviru sheme podpore, določene za sektor vina
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [1], and in particular points (c), (l), and (n) of Article 142,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 [1], ter zlasti člena 142(c), (l) in (n) Uredbe,
On the basis of the experience gained and in particular the improvements made in the supporting systems used by the national administrations when implementing Commission Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 [2] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 [3] it is appropriate to improve and simplify these two Regulations as regards the administration of direct payments and the related controls.
Na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj in zlasti izboljšav podpornih sistemov, ki jih nacionalne uprave uporabljajo pri izvajanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1121/2009 [2] in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1122/2009 [3], je primerno ti dve uredbi izboljšati in poenostaviti glede upravljanja neposrednih plačil in s tem povezanih kontrol.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009, Member States may use information available in the computerised database of the identification and registration system of bovine animals for an aid application for bovine animals.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 16(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 države članice lahko podatke, ki so na voljo v računalniški zbirki podatkov sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda, uporabljajo za zahtevke za pomoč za govedo.
It is appropriate to introduce a clarification on the start of the retention period applicable pursuant to Article 61 of Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 where Member States have made use of this possibility.
Primerno je uvesti pojasnilo o začetku obdobja obvezne reje, ki se uporablja v skladu s členom 61 Uredbe (ES) št. 1121/2009, kadar so države članice to možnost uporabile.
In addition, these Member States should, for the sake of simplification, be enabled to replace the submission of an application provided for in Article 62 of that Regulation by the submission of a statement of participation.
Poleg tega bi zaradi poenostavitve te države članice morale imeti možnost, da namesto zahtevka iz člena 62 navedene uredbe predložijo izjavo o sodelovanju.
Certain definitions set out in Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 should be updated.
Nekatere opredelitve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 je treba posodobiti.
Furthermore, the separate soft fruit payment provided for in Article 129 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 will be introduced as from 2012.
Poleg tega bo leta 2012 uvedeno ločeno plačilo za jagodičje iz člena 129 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
According to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009, Member States have to determine a latest date for submitting the single application.
V skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 morajo države članice določiti zadnji datum za predložitev enotnega zahtevka.
After submission of the single application, farmers have the possibility to amend their application within the deadlines set in Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009.
Kmeti imajo po predložitvi enotnega zahtevka možnost, da zahtevek spremenijo v rokih, ki so določeni v členu 14(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009.
Administrative controls and on-the-spot checks depend on the receipt of final applications by Member States.
Administrativne kontrole in pregledi na kraju samem so odvisni od prejema končnih zahtevkov držav članic.
Member States choosing to set the latest date for the submission of applications at an earlier date than the latest dates established in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 should also be able to start and finalise controls earlier.
Države članice, ki kot zadnji datum za predložitev zahtevkov določijo datum, ki nastopi prej, kot datum, določen v členu 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009, bi morale imeti možnost, da kontrole začnejo in zaključijo prej.
These Member States should therefore be allowed to establish a latest date for the amendments to the single application at an earlier date than the latest date established in Article 14(2).
Zato je treba tem državam članicam omogočiti, da kot zadnji datum za spremembe enotnega zahtevka določijo datum, ki nastopi prej kot datum, določen v členu 14(2).
However, to give farmers sufficient time to notify possible changes, that date should not be earlier than 15 days after the latest date fixed by Member States for the submission of the single application.
Kmeti pa morajo imeti dovolj časa za priglasitev morebitnih sprememb, zato ta datum ne sme biti prej, kot 15 dni po zadnjem datumu, ki ga države članice določijo za predložitev enotnega zahtevka.
Due to the introduction of area-related support decoupled from production, the on-the-spot checks are in many cases limited to the verification of the size and the eligibility status of the area concerned.
Zaradi uvedbe podpore na površino, ki je ločena od proizvodnje, so pregledi na kraju samem v številnih primerih omejeni na preverjanje velikosti in statusa upravičenosti zadevne površine.
Those checks are to a large extent performed by remote sensing.
V veliki meri se ti pregledi izvajajo z daljinskim zaznavanjem.
In parallel, Member States regularly update their identification system for agricultural parcels.
Hkrati države članice redno posodabljajo svoj sistem za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin.
The methodology used for such updates may be similar to the performance of on-the-spot checks by means of remote sensing.
Metodologija, ki se uporablja za take posodobitve, je lahko podobna izvajanju pregledov na kraju samem z daljinskim zaznavanjem.
Therefore, in a spirit of simplification and with a view to reducing administrative costs, it is appropriate to allow Member States performing a systematic update of the identification systems for agricultural parcels to use the results thereof as a replacement of part of the traditional on-the-spot checks.
Zato je v duhu poenostavitve in zaradi zmanjšanja administrativnih stroškov primerno, da se državam članicam, ki sistematično posodabljajo svoje sisteme za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin, dovoli, da namesto dela tradicionalnih pregledov na kraju samem uporabijo rezultate takih posodobitev.
To avoid creating any additional risk for irregular payments, criteria to be fulfilled by management and control systems in the Member States opting for this possibility should be defined.
Da se prepreči ustvarjanje dodatnih tveganj za neupravičena plačila, je treba opredeliti merila, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati sistemi upravljanja in nadzora v državah članicah, ki izberejo to možnost.
Those criteria should in particular address the intervals and the coverage of the update, any particulars on the ortho-images used, the required quality of the identification system for agricultural parcels and the maximum yearly error rate.
Ta merila bi morala zlasti obravnavati časovne razmike in zajetje posodobitve, podatke o uporabljenih ortoposnetkih, zahtevano kakovost sistema za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin ter najvišjo letno stopnjo napak.
The requirement for bovine animals in a farm to comply with Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 [4] is controlled via the on-the-spot checks performed under cross compliance.
S pregledi na kraju samem, ki se opravljajo v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti, se nadzoruje, da govedo na kmetiji izpolnjuje zahtevo Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. julija 2000 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo govedi ter o označevanju govejega mesa in proizvodov iz govejega mesa in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 820/97 [4].
Currently, there is also an obligation to check animals for which no aid is claimed in the context of eligibility controls of direct payments.
Trenutno je obvezno pregledovati tudi živali, za katere se ne zahteva pomoč v okviru kontrol upravičenosti neposrednih plačil.
This additional control is applied only in those Member States that have chosen to maintain any coupled direct payments for bovine animals.
Te dodatne kontrole se uporabljajo samo v državah članicah, ki so se odločile za ohranitev vezanih neposrednih plačil za govedo.
However, in order to have an equal control burden in all Member States and to simplify the on-the-spot checks for the farmers and the national authorities, it is appropriate to abolish the check of animals for which no aid is claimed in the context of eligibility controls unless Member States make use of the possibility provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009.
Zaradi enakega bremena nadzora v vseh državah članicah in zaradi poenostavitve pregledov na kraju samem za kmete in nacionalne organe pa je primerno, da se odpravijo pregledi živali, za katere se ne zahteva pomoč v okviru kontrol upravičenosti, razen če države članice uporabljajo možnost iz drugega pododstavka člena 16(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009.
According to Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009, where an animal is moved to another location during the retention period, the farmer has to inform the competent authority.
V skladu s členom 16(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 mora kmet v primeru, ko je žival premaknjena na drugo lokacijo v obdobju obvezne reje, o tem obvestiti pristojni organ.
To avoid the risk of disproportionate reductions of the payment, rules on animals determined as eligible for payment should be established for the cases where the notification of movements of animals has been omitted but where the relevant animals can be immediately identified within the holding of the farmer concerned during the on-the-spot check.
Da se prepreči tveganje nesorazmernega znižanja plačil, je treba določiti pravila za živali, ugotovljene kot upravičene do plačil za primere, kjer je bilo obvestilo o premikih živali izpuščeno, vendar je ustrezne živali mogoče med pregledom na kraju samem na gospodarstvu zadevnega kmeta takoj identificirati.
Rules on the identification and registration system of animals should in particular ensure traceability of animals.
Pravila o sistemu za identifikacijo in registracijo živali bi morala zlasti zagotoviti sledljivost živali.
A loss of both ear-tags of a bovine animal as well as the loss of any ear-tag of an ovine or caprine animal would render the animal ineligible for payments and also leads to reductions under Articles 65 and 66 of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009.
Izguba obeh ušesnih znamk goveda ter izguba ene od ušesnih znamk ovce ali koze bi pomenila, da žival ni več upravičena do plačil in povzroči tudi znižanja iz členov 65 in 66 Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009.
However, there are situations where those animals could be identified by other means and where traceability of the relevant animals is thus ensured.
Vendar obstajajo razmere, ko je take živali mogoče identificirati drugače in je tako zagotovljena sledljivost zadevnih živali.
According to Article 63(4)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009, when a bovine animal declared for payment has lost one of the two ear tags and can be clearly and individually identified by other means of the identification and registration system for bovine animals, that animal is still included in the number of animals determined and thus eligible for payment.
V skladu s členom 63(4)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 je govedo, prijavljeno za plačilo, ki je izgubilo eno od dveh ušesnih znamk in se lahko jasno in posamično identificira z drugimi sredstvi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda, še vedno vključeno v število ugotovljenih živali in tako upravičeno do plačila.
Moreover, the system for identification and registration of bovine animals is in general well established.
Poleg tega je sistem za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda na splošno dobro uveljavljen.
Therefore, where one bovine animal has lost both ear tags and its identity can be established without any doubt it should also be included in the number of animals determined and thus eligible for payment.
Zato bi eno govedo, ki je izgubilo obe ušesni znamki in je njegovo identiteto mogoče nedvomno ugotoviti, tudi moralo biti vključeno v število ugotovljenih živali in tako upravičeno do plačila.
This should however only apply if the farmer has taken measures to remedy the situation before the announcement of the on-the-spot check and, in order to avoid any risk of irregular payments, the application of this rule should be limited to one single animal.
To pa se lahko uporablja le, če je kmet pred napovedjo pregleda na kraju samem izvedel ukrepe za izboljšanje stanja, in da se prepreči tveganje za neupravičena plačila, je treba uporabo tega pravila omejiti na eno samo žival.
A new improved system for identification of ovine and caprine animals under Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 of 17 December 2003 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Directives 92/102/EEC and 64/432/EEC [5] has been implemented and it is therefore appropriate to introduce a similar provision for ovine and caprine animals declared for payment.
Na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 21/2004 z dne 17. decembra 2003 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in direktiv 92/102/EGS in 64/432/EGS [5] se izvaja nov, izboljšan sistem za identifikacijo ovc in koz in zato je primerno uvesti podobno določbo za ovce in koze, prijavljene za plačilo.
Member States making use of the possibility provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 should be allowed to provide that the notifications to the computerised database for identification and registration of bovine animals replace the notification from that farmer in case of a replacement of an animal during the retention period.
Državam članicam, ki uporabljajo možnost iz drugega pododstavka člena 16(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009, je treba omogočiti, da določijo, da priglasitve v računalniški zbirki podatkov za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda nadomestijo obvestilo kmeta v primeru nadomestitve živali v obdobju obvezne reje.
This possibility should be made available to all Member States.
Vse države članice bi morale imeti na razpolago to možnost.
Furthermore, certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 have become obsolete and should be deleted.
Nekatere določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 so postale zastarele in jih je treba črtati.
Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1122/2009 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
in Article 61, the following paragraph is added:
Členu 61 se doda naslednji odstavek:
‘However, where a Member State makes use of the possibility provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009, it shall fix the date when the period referred to in the first paragraph of this Article starts.’;
„Kadar pa država članica uporablja možnost iz drugega pododstavka člena 16(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009, določi datum začetka obdobja iz prvega odstavka tega člena.“
in Article 62, the following paragraph 3 is added:
Členu 62 se doda naslednji odstavek 3:
Where a Member State makes use of the possibility provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009, the application for the suckler cow premium may take the form of a statement of participation which shall also fulfil the requirements laid down in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of this Article.
Kadar država članica uporablja možnost iz drugega pododstavka člena 16(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009, ima zahtevek za premijo za krave dojilje lahko obliko izjave o sodelovanju, ki tudi izpolnjuje zahteve iz točk (a) in (b) prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 tega člena.
The Member State may decide that a statement of participation submitted for a given year is valid for one or more subsequent years where the information provided in the statement of participation remains accurate.’.
Država članica lahko odloči, da je izjava o sodelovanju, predložena za dano leto, veljavna še eno ali več naslednjih let, če informacije, navedene v izjavi o sodelovanju, ostajajo točne.“
point (12) is replaced by the following:
točka (12) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
“area-related aid schemes” means the single payment scheme, area-related payments under specific support and all aid schemes established under Titles IV and V of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, except those established under Sections 7, 10, and 11 of that Title IV, except the separate sugar payment established in Article 126 of that Regulation, except the separate fruit and vegetable payment established in Article 127 of that Regulation and except the separate soft fruit payment established in Article 129 of that Regulation.’;
‚sheme pomoči na površino‘ pomenijo shemo enotnega plačila, plačila na površino v okviru posebne podpore in vse sheme pomoči iz naslovov IV in V Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, razen tistih iz oddelkov 7, 10 in 11 naslova IV, razen ločenega plačila za sladkor iz člena 126 navedene uredbe in razen ločenega plačila za sadje in zelenjavo iz člena 127 navedene uredbe ter razen ločenega plačila za jagodičje iz člena 129 navedene uredbe.“;
point (21) is replaced by the following:
točka 21 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
“retention period” means the period during which an animal for which aid has been claimed has to be kept on the holding, as provided for in Article 35(3) and Article 61 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009
‚obdobje obvezne reje‘ pomeni obdobje, v katerem mora žival, za katero je bil vložen zahtevek za pomoč, ostati na kmetijskem gospodarstvu, kakor je določeno v členu 35(3) in členu 61 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1121/2009
in paragraph 6, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
prvi pododstavek odstavka 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
In the case of an application for transitional fruit and vegetables payments provided for in Section 8 of Chapter 1 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 the single application shall contain a copy of the contract for processing or the commitment to supply provided for in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009.’;
Pri zahtevku za prehodna plačila za sadje in zelenjavo iz oddelka 8 poglavja 1 naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 enotni zahtevek vsebuje kopijo pogodbe za predelavo ali zaveze za dobavo v skladu s členom 32 Uredbe (ES) št. 1121/2009.“;
in paragraph 8, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
prvi pododstavek odstavka 8 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Uses of area referred to in Articles 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and those listed in Annex VI to that Regulation or areas declared for the specific support provided for in Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, where those areas do not have to be declared in accordance with this Article, shall be declared under a separate heading in the single application form.’;
Raba površin iz člena 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 in tistih iz Priloge VI k navedeni uredbi ali površin, prijavljenih za posebno podporo, določeno v členu 68 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, kadar teh površin ni treba prijaviti v skladu s tem členom, se prijavi v posebni rubriki na obrazcu enotnega zahtevka.“