natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This mostly involved cases in which the undertakings entrusted with a public service task operated in the audiovisual sector (see, for example, the Commission Decision 2004/838/EC of 10 December 2003 on State aid implemented by France for France 2 and France 3 (OJ L 361, 8.12.2004, p. 21)).
Večinoma gre za primere, ko so bila podjetja, pooblaščena za opravljanje naloge javne službe, dejavna v avdiovizualnem sektorju (glej na primer Odločbo Komisije 2004/838/ES z dne 10. decembra 2003 o državni pomoči Francije za France 2 in France 3 (UL L 361, 8.12.2004, str. 21)).
See point 21 of the 2005 Community framework.
Glej točko 21 okvira Skupnosti iz leta 2005.
In answer to Crédit Mutuel’s argument (see footnote 26) in favour of application of the global approach under the second and third sentences of point 21 of the 2005 Community framework, according to which, where the service of general economic interest has costs that vary significantly from year to year, overcompensation in excess of 10 % in certain years may, exceptionally, prove necessary, the Commission would point out that, according to the fourth sentence of point 21, such ‘exceptional’ overcompensation ‘[…] necessary for the operation of the service of general economic interest’ must be justified by the Member State ‘in the notification to the Commission’ (underlining added).
Komisija v odgovoru na trditev Crédit Mutuel (glej opombo 26), ki je zahtevala uporabo celostnega pristopa na podlagi drugega in tretjega stavka točke 21 okvira Skupnosti iz leta 2005, v skladu s katerima se lahko, če stroški nekaterih storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena vsako leto znatno nihajo, prekomerno nadomestilo, ki v posameznih letih preseže 10 %, izjemoma izkaže za potrebno, opozarja, da mora v skladu s četrtim stavkom točke 21 tako „izjemno prekomerno nadomestilo […], potrebno za opravljanje storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena“, upravičiti država članica „v priglasitvi Komisiji“ (naš poudarek).
However, the measure at issue was not notified to the Commission and the Commission considers that Crédit Mutuel has not been in a highly specific situation justifying the authorisation, by way of exception, for certain specific years, of overcompensation in excess of 10 %.
Vendar zadevni ukrep ni bil priglašen Komisiji, zato ta meni, da Crédit Mutuel ni dokazala zelo posebnega položaja, ki je izjemoma upravičeval sprejetje prekomernega nadomestila, ki je v posameznih posebnih letih presegalo 10 %.
See, for example, the Commission Decision 2004/838/EC of 10 December 2003 on State aid implemented by France for France 2 and France 3 (OJ L 361, 8.12.2004, p. 21).
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije 2004/838/ES z dne 10. decembra 2003 o državni pomoči Francije za France 2 in France 3 (UL L 361, 8.12.2004, str. 21).
See the Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 25 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2007 (OJ C 317, 23.12.2006, p. 2).
Glej Obvestilo Komisije o veljavnih obrestnih merah za vračilo državne pomoči in o referenčnih/diskontnih merah za 25 držav članic, ki veljajo od 1. januarja 2007 (UL C 317, 23.12.2006, str. 2).
See also the following webpage: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference_rates.html
Glej tudi naslednjo spletno stran: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/legislation/reference_rates.html.
See recital 39.
Glej uvodno izjavo 39.
See, for example, a Competition Council opinion (opinion No 96-A-12 of 17 September 1996, p. 8), an information report by Senator Alain Lambert (report No 52 of 30 October 1996, p. 72) and a study by Nathalie Daley of the industrial economics centre CERNA (La banque de détail en France: de l’intermédiation aux services, February 2001, p. 9).
Glej zlasti mnenje Sveta za konkurenco (mnenje št. 96-A-12 z dne 17. septembra 1996, str. 8), informativno poročilo senatorja Alaina Lamberta (poročilo št. 52 z dne 30. oktobra 1996, str. 72) in študijo Nathalie Daley iz centra za industrijsko gospodarstvo CERNA (La banque de détail en France: de l’intermédiation aux services, februar 2001, str. 9).
See paragraphs 52 and 53 of the extension Decision.
Glej uvodni izjavi 52 in 53 odločitve o razširitvi postopka.
See paragraph 67 of the extension Decision, ‘Les éventuels résultats liés à la distribution exclusive du Livret bleu n’ont pu être quantifiés’.
Glej točko 67 odločitve o razširitvi postopka „Morebitnega poslovnega izida, povezanega z izključnim distribuiranjem Livret bleu, ni bilo mogoče kvantificirati“.
See paragraph 48 of the extension Decision and point 14 of the 2005 Community framework, which provides that: ‘The amount of compensation may not exceed what is necessary to cover the costs incurred in discharging the public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and reasonable profit for discharging those obligations’ (underling added).
Glej točko 48 odločitve o razširitvi postopka in točko 14 okvira Skupnosti iz leta 2005, ki določa: „Znesek nadomestila ne sme presegati zneska, potrebnega za pokrivanje stroškov, ki so nastali pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti javnih storitev, ob upoštevanju ustreznih prejemkov in zmernega dobička za izpolnjevanje navedenih obveznosti“ (naš poudarek).
See point 18 of the 2005 Community framework.
Glej točko 18 okvira Skupnosti iz leta 2005.
See Section 2 of Annex 1 to the extension Decision, paragraphs 124 to 137.
Glej oddelek 2 Priloge 1 k odločitvi o razširitvi postopka, točke 124 do 137.
See Section 2 of Annex 1 to the extension Decision, paragraph 132.
Glej oddelek 2 Priloge 1 k odločitvi o razširitvi postopka, točka 132.
See recitals 39 and 40.
Glej uvodni izjavi 39 in 40.
The data in the table are the result of calculations based on Banking Commission data: http://www.banquedefrance.fr/fr/supervi/analyses_comparatives/analyses_comparatives.htm
Podatki v preglednici so rezultat izračunov, opravljenih na podlagi podatkov francoske komisije za bančništvo: http://www.banquedefrance.fr/fr/supervi/analyses_comparatives/analyses_comparatives.htm.
The amounts are in billions of French francs before 1998 and billions of euro thereafter.
Zneski so izraženi v milijardah francoskih frankov za obdobje pred letom 1998 in v milijardah eurov po tem letu.
The 2008 data are estimates.
Podatki za leto 2008 so ocene.
The following reference rates are used for the years 1992 to 2008: 10,61; 11; 8,93; 7,94; 8,22; 7,01; 5,83; 4,77; 5,7; 6,33; 5,06; 4,8; 4,43; 4,08; 3,7; 4,62; 5,19.
Za obdobje 1992–2008 so bile uporabljene naslednje referenčne stopnje: 10,61; 11; 8,93; 7,94; 8,22; 7,01; 5,83; 4,77; 5,7; 6,33; 5,06; 4,8; 4,43; 4,08; 3,7; 4,62; 5.19.
Net cumulative, discounted result, in EUR million, taking into account brokerage commission, net results (costs minus revenue), deposits centralised with the CDC, non-earmarked uses and general-interest uses, and introducing a reasonable profit of 5 basis points for deposits centralised with the CDC together with a reasonable profit amounting on average to 6 % of the own capital allocated to general-interest uses and to non-earmarked uses (see subsections 7.2.1 to 7.2.4).
Kumulirani in diskontirani neto poslovni izid v milijonih eurov ob upoštevanju posredniške provizije, neto poslovnega izida (stroški minus prihodki), hranilnih vlog, centraliziranih pri CDC, prostih naložb in naložb splošnega pomena ter ob uvedbi zmernega dobička v višini petih bazičnih točk za hranilne vloge, centralizirane pri CDC, in zmernega dobička, ki povprečno znaša 6 % lastnega kapitala, namenjenega za naložbe splošnega pomena in proste naložbe (glej pododdelke 7.2.1 do 7.2.4).
Net non-cumulative, non-discounted result, in EUR million, taking into account brokerage commission, net results (costs minus revenue), deposits centralised with the CDC, non-earmarked uses and general-interest uses, and introducing a reasonable profit of 5 basis points for deposits centralised with the CDC together with a reasonable profit amounting on average to 6 % of the own capital allocated to general-interest uses and to non-earmarked uses (see subsections 7.2.1 to 7.2.4).
Nekumulirani in nediskontirani neto poslovni izid v milijonih eurov ob upoštevanju posredniške provizije, neto poslovnega izida (stroški minus prihodki), hranilnih vlog, centraliziranih pri CDC, prostih naložb in naložb splošnega pomena ter ob uvedbi zmernega dobička v višini petih bazičnih točk za hranilne vloge, centralizirane pri CDC, in zmernega dobička, ki povprečno znaša 6 % lastnega kapitala, namenjenega za naložbe splošnega pomena in proste naložbe (glej pododdelke 7.2.1 do 7.2.4).
The consultant’s report was submitted to the French authorities and to Crédit Mutuel for examination on 10 January 2000.
Njegovo poročilo je bilo francoskim organom in Crédit Mutuel predloženo v preučitev 10. januarja 2000.
A technical meeting on the report was organised on 7 February 2000 for the Commission, assisted by its consultant, the French authorities and Crédit Mutuel.
7. februarja 2000 je bil posvetovalni tehnični sestanek o tem poročilu, ki so se ga udeležili službe Komisije, ki jim je pomagal svetovalec, francoski organi in Crédit Mutuel.
Arthur Andersen defended its earlier conclusions in a document dated 13 September 2001, forwarded as an annex to a memo by the French authorities dated 15 September 2001.
Družba Arthur Andersen je vztrajala pri svojih prejšnjih ugotovitvah, navedenih v dokumentu z dne 13. septembra 2001, ki je bil posredovan skupaj z obvestilom francoskih organov z dne 15. septembra 2001.
The French authorities sent the Commission a new memo on 26 October 2001 containing a legal analysis of the Livret bleu from the perspective of Community competition law, as well as a memo of 7 January 2002 concerning the cost of the public-service task, reiterating the figures already presented by Crédit Mutuel without providing any new information.
Francoski organi so Komisiji 26. oktobra 2001 poslali novo obvestilo s pravno analizo sheme Livret bleu z vidika konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti, 7. januarja 2002 pa obvestilo o stroških naloge javne službe, v katerem so znova navedli številčne podatke, ki jih je predstavila že Crédit Mutuel, ne da bi navedli nove.
This commission, which was initially set at 1,3 % of the Livret bleu deposits allocated to the CDC, was reduced to 1,2 % on 1 January 2005, then to 1,1 % on 1 November 2005.
Ta provizija, ki je najprej znašala 1,3 % hranilnih vlog Livret bleu, dodeljenih na račun CDC, se je 1. januarja 2005 zmanjšala na 1,2 % in nato 1. novembra 2005 na 1,1 %.
The CDC uses the funds collected by Crédit Mutuel mainly to finance social housing.
CDC sredstva, ki jih je zbral Crédit Mutuel, uporablja predvsem za financiranje socialnih stanovanj.
It emerges that the overall number of permanent branches fell between 1991 and 1994, and then increased gradually to reach, in 1998, the same level as in 1990.
Pokazalo se je, da se je skupno število stalnih poslovalnic zmanjševalo od leta 1991 do leta 1994, nato pa se je postopno povečevalo do leta 1998, ko je doseglo raven iz leta 1990.
This trend differed according to the regions: the number of permanent, and subsequently non-permanent, branches of Crédit Mutuel dropped in the regions in which Crédit Mutuel was traditionally very strong (Loire Region, Brittany and Alsace), while the number of branches in other regions grew.
Razvoj je bil po regijah različen: število stalnih in nato nestalnih poslovalnic se je zmanjšalo v regijah z močno zgodovinsko uveljavljenostjo Crédit Mutuel (regija Loire, Bretanja, Alzacija), medtem ko se je v drugih regijah povečevalo.
An examination of time-series data shows the total amount of Livret bleu deposits and the total amount of other deposits increased considerably until a turning point in 1985 to 1987.
Preučitev časovnih vrst kaže, da so se hranilne vloge Livret bleu in druge hranilne vloge zelo povečale do spremembe v letih 1985–1987.
The growth in loans to households continues after that date and remains stronger for Crédit Mutuel than for its main competitors.
Povečevanje obsega posojil gospodinjstvom se je nadaljevalo tudi po tem datumu in ostaja pri Crédit Mutuel večji kot pri njenih glavnih konkurentih.
On a matter incidental to these proceedings, the Commission also received an additional statement from the complainants which stated that the purchase by Crédit Mutuel in April 1997 of Crédit Industriel et Commercial (CIC), when the latter was being privatised (it had previously been owned by the public insurance group GAN), had been possible because of the aid it had received for the Livret bleu, which increased its market share of savings from 2 % in 1969 to approximately 6,9 % in 1997.
Komisija je v okviru tega postopka prejela tudi dodaten dopis pritožnikov, v skladu s katerim je Crédit Mutuel aprila 1997 lahko kupila CIC ob privatizaciji te bančne ustanove, ki je bila prej v lasti javne skupine zavarovalnic GAN, in sicer zahvaljujoč pomoči, ki jo je prejemala v okviru sheme Livret bleu, zaradi česar se je tržni delež njenih hranilnih vlog z 2 % leta 1969 povečal na približno 6,9 % leta 1997.
According to the complainants, the undertaking’s own funds had increased rapidly because of the aid in question, rising from FRF 650 million (EUR 99 million) in 1974 to FRF 47,3 billion (EUR 7,2 billion) in 1997.
Lastni kapital podjetja se je po mnenju pritožnikov zaradi zadevne pomoči hitro povečeval in tako s 650 milijonov FRF (99 milijonov EUR) leta 1974 narasel na 47,3 milijarde FRF (7,2 milijarde EUR) leta 1997.
As for the third condition, the bank states that the compensation was not sufficient to cover the costs of gathering deposits, since the activity relating to the funds transferred to the CDC posted a loss over the whole of the 1991-2005 period.
kar zadeva tretji pogoj, banka meni, da nadomestilo ne zadostuje za kritje stroškov zbiranja, ker ima dejavnost v zvezi z naložbami, centraliziranimi pri CDC, negativni saldo za celotno obdobje 1991–2005;
Crédit Mutuel further holds that the fourth condition was met.
Crédit Mutuel meni, da je izpolnjen tudi četrti pogoj.
Crédit Mutuel also disagrees with the annual approach used by the Commission (that is the fact of taking into account only the amounts relating to years of overcompensation, without offsetting them with the amounts for years of undercompensation), which it believes runs counter to a number of precedents, the annulled Decision and, in its view, the Community framework of 2005 [26].
Crédit Mutuel nato izpodbija letni pristop, ki ga je uporabila Komisija (in sicer dejstvo, da je upoštevala le zneske za leta, v katerih je prišlo do prekomernega nadomestila, ne da bi jih izravnala z zneski za leta, v katerih je bilo nadomestilo premajhno) in ki je v nasprotju z nekaterimi prejšnjimi primeri in razveljavljeno odločbo ter po njegovem mnenju tudi v nasprotju z okvirom Skupnosti iz leta 2005 [26].
The Commission should adopt an overall approach (that is offsetting all of the amounts relating to years of overcompensation by those for years of undercompensation) for the whole of the 1991-98 period, on the one hand, and for the whole of the period beginning in 1999, on the other.
Komisija bi morala uporabiti celostni pristop (to je izravnati vse zneske za leta, v katerih je prišlo do prekomernega nadomestila, z zneski za leta, v katerih je bilo nadomestilo premajhno) za celotno obdobje 1991–1998 in za celotno obdobje, ki se je začelo leta 1999.
It pointed out that the risk weighting for Crédit Mutuel’s capital requirements for other savings products and resources other than the Livret bleu ranged from […]% to […]% from 1999 to 2005.
Trdila je, da se je ponderiranje tveganja za potrebe po lastnem kapitalu Crédit Mutuel za druge varčevalne produkte in sredstva, ki niso del sheme Livret bleu, spremenilo z […] % leta 1999 na […] % leta 2005.
The French authorities specified that, given the irrelevance of applying the European solvency ratio after the complete transfer of the deposits to the CDC in 1999, in order to calculate the reasonable profit corresponding to the Livret bleu, Crédit Mutuel factored in a cost of capital in reference to its other savings products and resources, which it capped ([…]% to […]% between 1999 and 2005).
Francoski organi so pojasnili, da je Crédit Mutuel ob upoštevanju, da uporaba evropske stopnje solventnosti od popolne centralizacije hranilnih vlog pri CDC leta 1999 ni pomembna, za izračun zmernega dobička od sheme Livret bleu vključila stroške lastnega kapitala, dosežene glede na stroške drugih varčevalnih produktov in sredstev, ki pa jih je omejila (od […] do […] % v obdobju 1999–2005).
The separate accounting for the Livret bleu was developed several years later and applied retroactively for the years up to 1991.
Ločene računovodske evidence sheme Livret bleu so bile uvedene več let pozneje in izdelane za nazaj za obdobje pred letom 1991.
There is therefore nothing to indicate that the level of brokerage commission was determined by reference to the costs of a typical, well-run undertaking performing the general-interest task in question.
Torej ni nobenega podatka, da je bila raven posredniške provizije določena glede na stroške povprečnega, dobro vodenega podjetja, ki opravlja zadevno nalogo splošnega pomena.
However, they do not really back up this claim, but instead refer mainly to paragraph 13 of the extension Decision, where the Commission simply mentions the overall financial results (balance-sheet size, net profit or loss, cost/income ratio, equity capital and solvency ratio) of Crédit Mutuel in 2004.
Vendar v resnici ne dokazujejo te trditve, temveč se v glavnem sklicujejo na točko 13 odločitve o razširitvi postopka, v kateri Komisija navaja le skupne finančne rezultate (bilančno vsoto, neto poslovni izid, razmerje med stroški in prihodki, lastni kapital in stopnjo solventnosti) Crédit Mutuel za leto 2004.
At all events, if a Member State has determined the level of compensation on the basis of an analysis of the costs of a typical, well-run undertaking, it should have no difficulty proving it to the Commission and outlining the methodology followed — something which France has not done in this case.
Če je država članica določila raven nadomestila na podlagi analize stroškov povprečnega, dobro vodenega podjetja, vsekakor ne bi smela imeti težav to dokazati Komisiji in ji predstaviti uporabljeno metodologijo, česar pa Francija v tej zadevi ni storila.
The brokerage commission was paid annually [47] to Crédit Mutuel by the CDC under an agreement between the State and Crédit Mutuel laying down detailed rules for implementing the Order of 27 September 1991.
CDC je banki Crédit Mutuel vsako leto [47] plačeval posredniško provizijo na podlagi sporazuma med državo in Crédit Mutuel, v katerem so bila določena podrobna pravila za izvajanje odloka z dne 27. septembra 1991.
The amount of brokerage commission is set by the State to compensate for the public service obligations.
Znesek posredniške provizije je določila država za nadomestilo za izpolnjevanje obveznosti javne službe.
The Decision of 10 May 2007 states that the Livret bleu belongs to a ‘market’ for liquid bank savings, which implies that the activity in question is open to competition and in no way supports the French authorities’ argument that that activity was not opened to competition until 1993.
Komisija v odločbi z dne 10. maja 2007 opozarja, da shema Livret bleu spada na „trg“ likvidnih bančnih hranilnih vlog, kar zahteva odprtje zadevne dejavnosti za konkurenco, in nikakor ne potrjuje trditve francoskih organov, da je bila zadevna dejavnost odprta za konkurenco šele leta 1993.
On the contrary, the Decision refers to the existence of a ‘mature’ market [52].
Nasprotno, Komisija se v odločbi sklicuje na obstoj „zrelega“ [52] trga.
It takes account of all the advantages connected with the Livret bleu, without, however, including a possible pull effect whose scope could not be established (see subsection 7.2.3).
Upošteva vse prednosti, povezane s shemo Livret bleu, vendar ne vključuje morebitnega učinka vabe, katerega obsega ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti (glej pododdelek 7.2.3).
A reasonable profit is taken into account (see subsection 7.2.4), including for deposits centralised with the CDC.
Zmerni dobiček je upoštevan (glej pododdelek 7.2.4), enako pa tudi hranilne vloge, centralizirane pri CDC.
In the extension Decision, the calculation of the net results of the Livret bleu for the purpose of assessing whether there was any overcompensation included the results for the whole of 1991 [55].
V odločitvi o razširitvi postopka je bil v izračun neto poslovnega izida sheme Livret bleu za presojo obstoja morebitnega prekomernega nadomestila vključen poslovni izid celotnega leta 1991 [55].
In other words, the net revenue from non-earmarked uses and general-interest uses was factored in as of 1 January 1991.
Povedano drugače, neto prihodki od prostih naložb in naložb splošnega pomena so se upoštevali od 1. januarja 1991.
The costs and revenues connected with the performance of the service of general economic interest cannot therefore predate 27 September 1991.
Stroški in prihodki v zvezi z opravljanjem storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena torej ne morejo biti starejši od 27. septembra 1991.
In other words, it is only as from the creation of the aid measure at issue (the brokerage commission) that account can be taken of the costs and revenues connected with the performance of the general economic interest service financed by that aid.
Povedano drugače, šele od uvedbe zadevnega ukrepa pomoči (posredniške provizije) se lahko upoštevajo stroški in prihodki v zvezi z opravljanjem storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ki se je financirala s to pomočjo.
The 2005 Community framework was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 29 November 2005.
Okvir Skupnosti iz leta 2005 je bil v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavljen 29. novembra 2005.
It is therefore necessary to apply the rules in force at the time the aid was granted with respect to the period before 2006 and the 2005 Community framework with respect to the period from 1 January 2006 to the measure’s termination on 31 December 2008.
Zato je treba za obdobje pred letom 2006 uporabiti pravila, ki so veljala ob dodelitvi pomoči, za obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do ukinitve ukrepa 31. decembra 2008 pa okvir Skupnosti iz leta 2005.
The French authorities referred to the Bank Branches (opening and closing) Act, which was repealed in 1987.
Francoski organi so se sklicevali na zakon o odprtju in zaprtju bančnih poslovalnic, ki je bil razveljavljen leta 1987.
From 1987 to 1991, supervision arrangements were nevertheless kept in place with respect to Crédit Mutuel.
Vseeno se je v obdobju 1987–1991 ohranil sistem nadzora za Crédit Mutuel.
The rules provided for a system for the authorisation, and not a system for the formal prohibition, of branch closures or restructurings, in particular as from 1987.
S predpisi je bil določen sistem odobritve in ne sistem formalne prepovedi zaprtja poslovalnic ali prestrukturiranj, zlasti od leta 1987.
The system was radically reformed by a Decree of 27 September 1991 [18] to bring the Livret bleu gradually into line with the Livret A system. After the Decree was adopted, all new deposits [19] were centralised with the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (hereinafter: ‘CDC’) which, in return, paid Crédit Mutuel a brokerage commission.
Ta sistem je bil temeljito reformiran z odlokom z dne 27. septembra 1991 [18], s katerim je bila shema Livret bleu usklajena s sistemom Livret A. Od tega odloka so bile namreč vse nove hranilne vloge [19] centralizirane pri Caisse des Dépôts et Consignation (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CDC), ki je Crédit Mutuel v zameno plačal posredniško provizijo.
The Crédit Mutuel group, under the group’s two trade names (Crédit Mutuel and Crédit Industriel et Commercial (hereinafter: ‘CIC’)), has almost 6000 outlets and more than 72000 employees.
Skupina Crédit Mutuel, ki deluje pod dvema firmama (Crédit Mutuel in Crédit Industriel et Commercial (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CIC)) ima skoraj 6000 poslovalnic in več kot 72000 zaposlenih.