natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, Ryanair advertises Bratislava as one of its destinations on its website.
Poleg tega družba Ryanair na svoji spletni strani Bratislavo oglašuje kot enega od svojih namembnih krajev.
However, BTS does not pay for this publicity, even though it cannot be excluded that a certain value could be attached to it.
Vendar družba BTS za to oglaševanje ne plačuje, čeprav ni mogoče izključiti, da mu je mogoče pripisati določeno vrednost.
The Commission notes that all these qualitative elements have also contributed positively to BTS’s operational and financial situation and increased its market value for shareholders.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so vsi ti kakovostni elementi pozitivno vplivali na operativno in finančno stanje družbe BTS ter povečali njeno tržno vrednost za delničarje.
They therefore complement the above-mentioned cost-benefit analysis.
Zato dopolnjujejo zgoraj navedeno analizo stroškov in koristi.
In view of the above, the Commission concludes that, at the time the Ryanair Agreement was signed, BTS considered that the Agreement would make the airport more profitable.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega lahko Komisija ugotovi, da je družba BTS ob podpisu sporazuma z družbo Ryanair menila, da bi se na podlagi sporazuma lahko povečala donosnost letališča.
The Commission can therefore accept that, under similar circumstances, a market economy operator would have decided to conclude a similar agreement with Ryanair as BTS.
Zato lahko Komisija dopusti, da bi se subjekt v tržnem gospodarstvu v podobnih okoliščinah odločil za sklenitev podobnega sporazuma z družbo Ryanair kot družba BTS.
As at least one of the cumulative criteria pursuant to Article 107(1) TFEU is not met, the Commission considers that the Agreement does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU,
Ker vsaj eno od kumulativnih meril v skladu s členom 107(1) PDEU ni izpolnjeno, Komisija meni, da Sporazum ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU –
The Agreement of 5 December 2005 concluded between Letisko M. R. Štefánika — Airport Bratislava, a.s. and Ryanair Ltd does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Sporazum z dne 5. decembra 2005, ki sta ga sklenili družbi Letisko M. R. Štefánika – Airport Bratislava, a.s., in Ryanair Ltd, ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the TFEU.
Člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES sta z učinkom od 1. decembra 2009 postala člena 107 oziroma 108 PDEU.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanja na člena 107 in 108 PDEU razumeti kot sklicevanja na člena 87 oziroma 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to ustrezno.
OJ C 173, 8.7.2008, p. 9.
UL C 173, 8.7.2008, str. 9.
The National Property Fund is a legal entity established in 1991 pursuant to Act of the National Council No 253/1991 on the scope of activities by organisations in the Slovak Republic in matters involving the transfer of state property to other persons and on the National Property Fund of the Slovak Republic (for detailed information see http://www.natfund.gov.sk/).
Sklad za nacionalno lastnino je pravni subjekt, ki je bil ustanovljen leta 1991 na podlagi zakona državnega sveta št. 253/1991 o obsegu dejavnosti organov Slovaške republike v zvezi s prenosom državne lastnine na druge osebe in o Skladu Slovaške republike za nacionalno lastnino (za več informacij glej http://www.natfund.gov.sk/).
The purpose of its existence and its main activity is to transfer State property identified for privatisation to non-State entities.
Namen njegovega obstoja in njegova glavna dejavnost je prenos državne lastnine, namenjene privatizaciji, na nedržavne subjekte.
The Fund is under the direct supervision of the National Council of the Slovak Republic, to which the Fund’s budget is submitted for approval, along with proposals for the use of the Fund’s property pursuant to Article 28(3)(b) of the Act, annual financial statements and the annual report on the Fund’s activities.
Sklad neposredno nadzoruje Državni svet Slovaške republike, ki se mu v odobritev predložijo proračun Sklada skupaj s predlogi za uporabo njegove lastnine na podlagi člena 28(3)(b) zakona št. 253/1991, letni finančni izkazi in letno poročilo o njegovih dejavnostih.
The complainant provided the Commission with a list of charges, published in the AIP, valid as of December 2005:landing charge: SKK 425 (approx. EUR 11,20) per tonne (MTOM),parking charge: SKK 9 (approx. EUR 0,237) per tonne per hour,passenger charge: SKK 490 (approx. EUR 12,90) per passenger,approach and air traffic control charge: SKK 230 (approx. EUR 6,07) per tonne.Landing charge, parking charge and passenger charge are paid to the airport.
Pritožnik je Komisiji predložil seznam pristojbin, ki je bil objavljen v zborniku AIP in velja od decembra 2005:pristajalne pristojbine: 425 SKK (približno 11,20 EUR) na tono (MTOM),parkirnina: 9 SKK (približno 0,237 EUR) na tono na uro,pristojbina za potnike: 490 SKK (približno 12,90 EUR) na potnika,pristojbina za približevanje letališču in kontrolo zračnega prometa: 230 SKK (približno 6,07 EUR) na tono.Pristajalna pristojbina, parkirnina in pristojbina za potnike se plačajo letališču.
Charges for approach and airport control are collected by the Air Traffic Services of the Slovak Republic.
Pristojbine za približevanje letališču in kontrolo zračnega prometa pobira Služba zračnega prometa Slovaške republike.
An example of the Boeing 737-800 aircraft with 189 seats, a load factor of 83 % and MTOM of 69,9 tonnes was considered for the calculations.
Za izračune se je uporabil primer zrakoplova Boeing 737-800 s 189 sedeži, faktorjem zasedenosti 83 % in MTOM 69,9 tone.
The service charge for existing destinations allegedly amounts to […] per Boeing 737-800 (departure and arrival).
Pristojbina za storitve za obstoječe namembne kraje domnevno znaša […] na Boeing 737-800 (odhod in prihod).
Ground handling charges are regulated under separate agreements between the airport and the airline.
Pristojbine za storitve zemeljske oskrbe se urejajo z ločenimi sporazumi med letališčem in letalsko družbo.
According to the complainant, a very competitive handling fee amounts to approximately EUR 250 per aircraft.
Pritožnik navaja, da zelo konkurenčna pristojbina za oskrbo znaša približno 250 EUR na zrakoplov.
These charges include safety measures (such as firefighting), security checks on passengers and luggage and other security services required by law.
Te pristojbine vključujejo varnostne ukrepe (kot je protipožarna obramba), varnostne preglede potnikov in prtljage ter druge predpisane varnostne storitve.
Ryanair does not base its aircraft at the Airport.
Družba Ryanair nima baze svojih zrakoplovov na tem letališču.
The Slovak flag carrier, which was sold to Austrian Airlines and went into bankruptcy in 2006.
Slovaški nacionalni prevoznik, ki je bil prodan družbi Austrian Airlines in je leta 2006 razglasil stečaj.
In the opinion of BTS, the complainant incorrectly assumes Ryanair’s load factor to be 83 %.
Družba BTS meni, da pritožnik napačno domneva, da je faktor zasedenosti za družbo Ryanair 83 %.
Neither Ryanair nor any other comparable air carrier has ever achieved such a load factor at the Airport.
Niti družba Ryanair niti kateri koli drug primerljivi letalski prevoznik ni na letališču nikoli dosegel takega faktorja zasedenosti.
Ryanair can only be compared with another low-cost carrier operating at BTS (e.g. Sky Europe in 2005), which achieved a load factor of 63 % in the year the Ryanair agreement was signed.
Družbo Ryanair je mogoče primerjati le z drugim nizkocenovnim prevoznikom, ki opravlja lete na letališče BTS (npr. SkyEurope v letu 2005), ki je v letu, ko je bil podpisan sporazum z družbo Ryanair, dosegel faktor zasedenosti 63 %.
BTS also explains that almost 100 % of operating capacity costs, excluding aircraft handling costs (terminal, runways and other areas, depreciation, interest, repairs and maintenance, energy, services, IT system licences, personnel costs and administration) can be considered fixed company costs, which do not change substantially in the light of changes in the number of passengers handled by the airport.
Družba BTS še pojasnjuje, da je mogoče skoraj 100 % stroškov operativnih zmogljivosti brez stroškov odpreme letal (terminal, vzletno-pristajalne steze in druga območja ter amortizacija, obresti, popravila in vzdrževanje, energija, storitve, licence za sistem IT, stroški za osebje, uprava) obravnavati kot nespremenljive stroške družbe, ki se zaradi spreminjanja števila potnikov na letališču zelo malo spreminjajo.
Which finally failed.
Ki je bil nazadnje neuspešen.
In order to carry out its assessment, the Commission also commissioned Moore Stephens (hereinafter: ‘Commission expert’) to carry out a study.
Komisija je za izvedbo svoje ocene za študijo pooblastila družbo Moore Stephens (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izvedenec Komisije).
The Commission expert analysed the financial data and assumptions underpinning the Ryanair Agreement.
Izvedenec Komisije je analiziral finančne podatke in predpostavke, na katerih temelji sporazum z družbo Ryanair.
In carrying out this study they were assisted by BTS and had access to all necessary documents, provided by the airport in a data room, and also to BTS management.
Pri izvedbi te študije mu je pomagala družba BTS, pri čemer je imel dostop do vseh potrebnih dokumentov, ki jih je letališče zagotovilo v podatkovni sobi, in tudi do uprave družbe BTS.
They were also given unlimited access to the airport’s financial, contractual and other documentation.
Izvedencu Komisije je bil zagotovljen tudi neomejen dostop do finančne, pogodbene in druge dokumentacije letališča.
Case C-305/89 Italy v Commission (‘ALFA Romeo’), [1991] ECR I-1603, paragraph 20, Case T-296/97 Alitalia v Commission [2000] ECR II-3871, paragraph 84.
Sodba v zadevi „Alfa Romeo“, Italija proti Komisiji (C-305/89), Recueil, str. I-1603, točka 20; sodba v zadevi Alitalia proti Komisiji (T-296/97), Recueil, str. II-3871, točka 84.
Judgment of the Court of 16 May 2002, C-482/99, France/Commission (hereinafter: ‘Stardust Marine Judgment’), Rec.2002, p. I-04397, paragraph 71.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodba Stardust Marine), Recueil, str. I-04397, točka 71.
In the context of a possible discrimination of charges between air carriers at BTS, the Commission observes that the Ryanair service charge per passenger in 2008 is comparable to the charge per passenger paid by Sky Europe, e.g. Sky Europe carried 892939 passengers in 2008 and paid a charge of […] per passenger, including a parking fee for aircraft at the airport; in comparison, Ryanair carried 762541 passengers and paid a charge of […] per passenger, excluding parking fees for aircraft.
Komisija v zvezi z mogočo diskriminacijo glede pristojbin med letalskimi prevozniki na letališču BTS ugotavlja, da je pristojbina za storitve za družbo Ryanair na potnika v letu 2008 primerljiva s pristojbino na potnika, ki jo je plačala družba SkyEurope, in sicer je ta družba leta 2008 prepeljala 892939 potnikov in plačala pristojbino v višini […] na potnika, vključno s pristojbino za parkiranje zrakoplova na letališču, medtem ko je družba Ryanair prepeljala 762541 potnikov in plačala pristojbino v višini […] na potnika, kar izključuje parkirnino za zrakoplove.
Thus, the charges at BTS differentiate only between the level of the service provided and the volume of passengers carried.
Zato se pristojbine na letališču BTS razlikujejo le glede na raven zagotovljenih storitev in število prepeljanih potnikov.
The Commission did not receive any contrary comments from the competitors of Ryanair at BTS during its formal investigation.
Komisija med formalno preiskavo ni prejela nasprotnih pripomb konkurentov družbe Ryanair na letališču BTS.
In the calculation, the cost base relates to 2007; costs for 2005 were lower.
Pri izračunu se stroškovna osnova nanaša na leto 2007; stroški za leto 2005 so bili nižji.
Net Present Value (hereinafter: NPV), calculated on the basis of 6,9 % as the discounting rate.
Neto sedanja vrednost (v nadaljnjem besedilu: NSV), izračunana na podlagi 6,9-odstotne diskontne stopnje.
Infrastructure investment and the financing thereof irrevocably committed before the airports were considered to be undertakings within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU (date of the first Aéroport de Paris judgment).
Naložbe v infrastrukturo in njihovo financiranje, ki so bili dokončani, preden so se letališča štela za podjetja v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU (datum prve sodbe v zadevi Aéroport de Paris).
The investment decision for the replacement of the old terminal was taken independently of the decision to enter into a contractual relation with Ryanair, and before the Ryanair agreement was signed.
Odločitev o naložbi za nadomestitev starega terminala je bila sprejeta neodvisno od odločitve o sklenitvi pogodbenega razmerja z družbo Ryanair in preden je bil podpisan sporazum s to družbo.
BTS did not receive State aid for the construction of the new terminal.
Družba BTS ni prejela državne pomoči za gradnjo novega terminala.
The profit margin (also called the return on sales) compares net profit to sales (revenues).
S stopnjo dobička (ali tako imenovanim donosom od prodaje) se primerjata neto dobiček in prodaja (prihodki).
This ratio shows whether an undertaking is making sufficient return on sales, as it determines how much profit is produced per euro of sales revenue; it is a profitability and efficiency indicator.
To razmerje kaže, ali podjetje ustvarja zadosten donos od prodaje, saj določa, koliko dobička se ustvari na en euro prihodkov od prodaje; je kazalnik donosnosti in učinkovitosti.
Case T-196/04 Ryanair v Commission (‘Charleroi Judgment’), [2008], paragraph 59.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 17. decembra 2008 v zadevi Ryanair proti Komisiji (Zadeva Charleroi, T-196/04), točka 59.
It transmitted the comments to Slovakia by electronic mail on 11 September 2008.
Pripombe je 11. septembra 2008 po e-pošti posredovala Slovaški.
Slovakia was given the opportunity to respond to these comments.
Slovaški je bila dana možnost, da odgovori nanje.
At the request of the Slovak authorities, a meeting took place on 26 November 2008.
Na zahtevo slovaških organov je bilo 26. novembra 2008 organizirano srečanje.
The Commission received Slovakia’s observations by electronic mail dated 17 December 2008.
Komisija je pripombe Slovaške prejela z e-pošto z dne 17. decembra 2008.
Ryanair committed itself in this Agreement to pay for a minimum of […] routes per day as from 1 July 2009, even if it operated fewer routes in the period from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2016.
Družba Ryanair se je v tem sporazumu zavezala, da bo od 1. julija 2009 plačevala za najmanj […] prog na dan, tudi če bi v obdobju od 1. julija 2009 do 30. junija 2016 opravljala lete na manj progah.
BTS committed itself to provide sufficient facilities to Ryanair in order to enable it to operate this agreed minimum of […] routes per day.
Družba BTS se je zavezala, da bo družbi Ryanair zagotovila ustrezne objekte in opremo, da bo ta lahko opravljala lete na dogovorjenem številu najmanj […] prog na dan.
BTS
Družba BTS
Ryanair
Družba Ryanair
With regard to the timing of the Agreement, Ryanair explains that the conclusion of the Agreement was preceded by a long phase of preparation and negotiation between Ryanair and BTS, starting at least as early as December 2003.
Kar zadeva čas sklenitve Sporazuma, družba Ryanair pojasnjuje, da je njegova sklenitev sledila dolgemu obdobju priprav in pogajanj med družbama Ryanair in BTS, ki se je začelo že decembra 2003 ali celo prej.
The Agreement was indeed concluded on 5 December 2005, whereas the last day for the submission of bid proposals was 24 January 2006, i.e. more than one and a half months later.
Sporazum je bil dejansko sklenjen 5. decembra 2005, medtem ko je bil zadnji dan za predložitev ponudb 24. januar 2006, tj. več kot mesec in pol pozneje.
This actually happened, as the landing charge was reduced by 7,1 % in January 2008.
To se je tudi dejansko zgodilo, saj se je pristajalna pristojbina januarja 2008 znižala za 7,1 %.
In addition, the Agreement provides for an annual increase of […] in the service charge.
Poleg tega je v Sporazumu določeno letno povišanje pristojbine za storitve za […].
It further explains that BTS’s main objective was to optimise its passenger volumes and compete in the market for airport services, and that BTS based its decision on continuously updated financial analyses, which can also be confirmed by exchanges of letters between BTS and Ryanair during a long negotiation process starting in December 2003.
Poleg tega pojasnjuje, da je bil glavni cilj družbe BTS čim bolj povečati število potnikov in konkurirati na trgu letaliških storitev ter da je družba BTS svojo odločitev utemeljila z redno posodobljenimi finančnimi analizami, kar potrjujejo tudi izmenjave dopisov med družbama BTS in Ryanair v dolgotrajnem procesu pogajanj, ki se je začel decembra 2003.
Ryanair states that, for example, a letter from BTS dated 12 December 2003 containing an interim offer of discounts indicates that the Airport had conducted financial cost-benefit analyses.
Družba Ryanair navaja, da je v dopisu družbe BTS z dne 12. decembra 2003, ki vključuje vmesno ponudbo popustov, na primer navedeno, da je letališče izvedlo finančne analize stroškov in koristi.
BTS signed the Agreement with Ryanair on 5 December 2005.
Družba BTS je sporazum z družbo Ryanair podpisala 5. decembra 2005.
The Commission must also base its assessment on the information and assumptions available to the operator when the Agreement was signed.
Komisija mora oceno opraviti tudi na podlagi informacij in predpostavk, ki so bile operaterju na voljo ob podpisu Sporazuma.
According to the Agreement (Article 2.1), Ryanair committed to operate at least […] existing destinations per day from mid-2009.
Družba Ryanair se je v skladu s Sporazumom (člen 2.1) zavezala, da bo od sredine leta 2009 opravljala lete v vsaj […] obstoječih namembnih krajev na dan.
After mid-2009, much lower growth was expected.
Od sredine leta 2009 se pričakuje veliko manjša rast.
As the Slovak Republic does not currently have a national flag carrier and its former air carrier was small (6 % of passengers at BTS in 2005), and in other Member States comparable airlines still carry at least 40 % of the passengers at comparable airports, BTS was highly dependent on a privately owned airline, Sky Europe, which carried approximately 73 % of the passengers at the Airport in 2005.
Ker Slovaška republika zdaj nima nacionalnega prevoznika in ker je bil promet njenega prejšnjega letalskega prevoznika majhen (6 % potnikov na letališču BTS v letu 2005), medtem ko v drugih državah članicah primerljive letalske družbe še vedno prepeljejo vsaj 40 % potnikov na primerljivem letališču, je bila družba BTS zelo odvisna od zasebne letalske družbe SkyEurope, ki je leta 2005 prepeljala približno 73 % vseh potnikov.
It should be noted that, due to the Agreement with Ryanair, BTS was indeed able to diversify its customer base, and was thus able to reduce the risk which arose during 2009 as Sky Europe went into bankruptcy.
Ugotoviti je mogoče, da je družba BTS zaradi Sporazuma z družbo Ryanair dejansko diverzificirala svojo osnovo potrošnikov in s tem zmanjšala tveganje, ki se je pojavilo v letu 2009, ko je družba SkyEurope razglasila stečaj.
The Agreement allegedly provides for a substantial reduction in charges.
V Sporazumu naj bi bilo določeno znatno znižanje pristojbin.
With a given load factor (157 passengers), Ryanair pays to the Airport an all-inclusive fee of […] per passenger ([…] for 157 passengers; departure and arrival) for the new scheduled destination.
Pri danem faktorju zasedenosti (157 potnikov) družba Ryanair letališču plačuje pavšalno pristojbino v višini […] na potnika ([…] za 157 potnikov, odhod in prihod) za novi redni namembni kraj.
The so-called service charge for new destinations would be applied to all destinations during the first 12 months after the Agreement has entered into force. For each successive year, the service charge for new destinations will be increased by […].
Tako imenovana pristojbina za storitve za nove namembne kraje se bo uporabljala za vse namembne kraje v prvih dvanajstih mesecih po začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma.
of 31 January 2011
z dne 31. januarja 2011
pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the State of Israel with regard to automated processing of personal data
o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki ga zagotavlja Država Izrael pri avtomatizirani obdelavi osebnih podatkov, v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES
Having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, [1] and in particular Article 25(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [1] ter zlasti člena 25(6) Direktive,
Pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC, Member States are required to provide that the transfer of personal data to a third country may take place only if the third country in question ensures an adequate level of protection and if the Member States’ laws implementing other provisions of the Directive are complied with prior to the transfer.
V skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES morajo države članice zagotoviti, da se prenos osebnih podatkov v tretjo državo lahko izvede le, če zadevna tretja država zagotovi ustrezno raven varstva in če se pred prenosom upoštevajo predpisi držav članic, ki izvajajo druge določbe Direktive.
Given the different approaches to data protection in third countries, the adequacy assessment should be carried out, and any decision based on Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC should be made and enforced in a way that does not arbitrarily or unjustifiably discriminate against or between third countries where like conditions prevail, nor constitute a disguised barrier to trade, regard being had to the European Union’s present international commitments.
Glede na različne pristope k varstvu podatkov v tretjih državah bi bilo treba oceniti ustreznost, morebitno odločitev na podlagi člena 25(6) Direktive 95/46/ES pa bi bilo treba sprejeti in uveljaviti na tak način, da ne pride do samovoljne ali neupravičene diskriminacije do tretjih držav ali med tretjimi državami, v katerih prevladujejo podobne okoliščine, in da ne pride do prikrite trgovinske ovire, ob upoštevanju obstoječih mednarodnih obveznosti Evropske unije.
The State of Israel’s legal system has no written constitution but constitutional status has been conferred on certain ‘Basic Laws’ by the Supreme Court of the State of Israel.
Izraelski pravni sistem nima pisane ustave, ima pa „temeljne zakone“, ki jim je Vrhovno sodišče Države Izrael podelilo ustavni značaj.
Those ‘Basic Laws’ are complemented by a large body of case law, as the Israeli legal system adheres to a great extent to common law principles.
Navedene „temeljne zakone“ dopolnjuje obsežna sodna praksa, saj izraelski pravni sistem v veliki meri temelji na načelih občega prava.
The right to privacy is included in the ‘Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty’ under section 7.
Pravico do zasebnosti ureja člen 7 „temeljnega zakona o človekovem dostojanstvu in svobodi“.