natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation regarding the continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 (‘RIP’ or ‘Review Investigation Period’).
Preiskava glede nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2008 do 31. decembra 2008 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2005 up to the end of the RIP (period considered).
Preučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2005 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is the same as that in the previous investigations, i.e. silicon metal originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN code 28046900 (silicon content less than 99,99 % by weight).
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot izdelek iz prejšnjih preiskav, tj. silicijeva kovina s poreklom iz LRK, ki trenutno spada pod oznako KN 28046900 (vsebuje manj kot 99,99 mas. % silicija).
Purely by reason of the current classification set out in the Combined Nomenclature, it should read ‘silicon’.
Samo zaradi sedanje razvrstitve v kombinirani nomenklaturi se mora glasiti „silicij“.
Silicon with a higher purity, that is containing by weight not less than 99,99 % of silicon, used mostly in the electronic semi-conductor industry, falls under a different CN code and is not covered by this proceeding.
Silicij večje čistosti, ki vsebuje najmanj 99,99 mas. % silicija in se večinoma uporablja v elektronski industriji polprevodnikov, je razvrščen pod drugo oznako KN in ga ta postopek ne zajema.
Silicon is produced in electric submerged arc furnaces with carbothermic reduction of quartz (silica) in the presence of various types of carbon reductants.
Silicij se proizvaja v potopnih elektrobločnih pečeh s karbotermično redukcijo kremenjaka (silicijevega dioksida) ob prisotnosti različnih vrst ogljikovih reducentov.
It is marketed in the form of lumps, grains, granules or powder according to internationally accepted technical specifications as regards its purity.
Prodaja se v obliki grudic, zrn, zrnc ali prahu skladno z mednarodno sprejetimi tehničnimi specifikacijami glede čistosti.
Silicon is used primarily by two industries: the chemical industry for the production of methylchlorosilanes or trichlorosilanes and tetrachlorosilicon, and the aluminium industry for the production of aluminium alloys, primary and secondary smelters, intended for the production of casting alloys for different industries, in particular the automotive and building industries.
Silicij uporabljata predvsem dve veji industrije, in sicer kemična industrija za proizvodnjo metilklorosilanov ali triklorosilanov in tetraklorosilicija ter industrija aluminija za proizvodnjo aluminijevih zlitin, s primarnimi in sekundarnimi talilnicami, ki so namenjene proizvodnji zlitin za ulivanje za različne industrije, zlasti avtomobilsko industrijo in gradbeništvo.
As in the previous expiry reviews, this investigation has shown that silicon produced in the PRC and exported to the Union, the silicon produced and sold on the domestic market of the analogue country (Brazil) and that manufactured and sold in the Union by the applicant Union producers have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Kot pri prejšnjih pregledih zaradi izteka ukrepa je ta preiskava pokazala, da imajo silicij, ki je proizveden v LRK in se izvaža v Unijo, silicij, proizveden in prodan na domačem trgu primerljive države (Brazilije), in silicij, ki ga v Uniji izdelujejo in prodajajo vložniki proizvajalci Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
It was therefore concluded that these products must be considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba vse te izdelke obravnavati kot podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As mentioned in recital 12, in the course of the investigation, the three companies claiming MET either did not export own-produced silicon to the European Union or dropped their MET claim.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 12, tri družbe, ki so vložile zahtevke za TGO, med preiskavo niso izvažale silicija iz lastne proizvodnje v Evropsko unijo ali pa so svoje zahtevke umaknile.
MET was not, therefore, granted to any company.
Zato se TGO tem družbam ni odobrila.
As a general rule, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, a countrywide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under that Article, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation and therefore qualify to be granted IT.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države, ki jih zajema navedeni člen, po potrebi načelno uvede dajatev na ravni države, razen v primerih, ko družbe dokažejo izpolnjevanje vseh meril iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe in so torej upravičene do IO.
export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sales are freely determined;
izvozne cene in količine ter pogoji prodaje so prosto določeni;
the majority of the shares belong to private persons, and it must be demonstrated that the company is sufficiently independent from State interference;
večina deležev je v lasti zasebnih oseb, pri čemer je treba dokazati zadostno raven neodvisnosti družbe od vmešavanja države;
exchange rate conversions are carried out at the market rate;
pretvorbe valut se izvajajo po tržnem tečaju;
State interference is not such as to permit circumvention of measures if individual exporters are given different rates of duty.
država se ne vmešava v takšni meri, da bi omogočila izogibanje ukrepom, če se posameznim izvoznikom dodelijo različne stopnje dajatve.
It is first noted that the company mentioned in recital 12 that first claimed MET but then withdrew its MET claim also withdrew its claim for IT.
Najprej je treba poudariti, da je družba iz uvodne izjave 12, ki je najprej vložila zahtevek za TGO, nato pa ga umaknila, umaknila tudi zahtevek za IO.
This claim was therefore not examined further.
Zato se ta zahtevek ni nadalje obravnaval.
Of the six companies or company groups which claimed only IT, three ceased cooperation and one did not supply the necessary information within the time limits set and therefore significantly impeded the investigation within the meaning of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Od šestih družb ali skupin družb, ki so vložile le zahtevke za IO, so tri prekinile sodelovanje, ena pa ni predložila potrebnih informacij v določenem roku, s čimer je močno ovirala preiskavo v smislu člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
They were therefore regarded as non-cooperating and findings with regard to them were based on the facts available in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zato so se te družbe obravnavale kot nesodelujoče, ugotovitve v zvezi z njimi pa so temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe.
The four companies or company groups concerned were notified of the likely application of facts available and the reasons thereof and given an opportunity to provide further explanations in accordance with Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zadevne štiri družbe ali skupine družb so bile obveščene o verjetni uporabi razpoložljivih dejstev in razlogih zanjo, pri čemer jim je bila v skladu s členom 18(4) osnovne uredbe dana možnost, da predložijo dodatna pojasnila.
However, no new evidence or information was received from any of the four companies that could have repaired the deficiencies of the replies submitted or changed the conclusion that Article 18 of the basic Regulation should apply to them.
Vendar nobena od njih ni predložila novih dokazov ali informacij, s katerimi bi bilo mogoče dopolniti predložene pomanjkljive odgovore ali spremeniti odločitev, da je treba za te družbe uporabiti člen 18 osnovne uredbe.
Of the two remaining company groups, and as indicated in recital 13, one company group cannot be regarded as an exporting producer of the product concerned and its claim for individual treatment was therefore not assessed.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 13, ene od preostalih dveh skupin družb ni mogoče obravnavati kot proizvajalca izvoznika zadevnega izdelka, zato njen zahtevek za individualno obravnavo ni bil ocenjen.
The remaining exporter was found to fulfil all criteria set in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da preostali izvoznik izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
From the above, it is concluded that IT should be granted to the Jinneng Group.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da je treba skupini Jinneng Group odobriti IO.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET has to be established on the basis of the prices or constructed value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je treba normalno vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, določiti na podlagi cen ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
Although Norway was used as an analogue country in the original investigation and in the following expiry reviews, the current investigation revealed that circumstances with regard to the Norwegian market had since changed significantly.
Čeprav se je v prvotni preiskavi in naslednjih pregledih zaradi izteka ukrepa kot primerljiva država uporabila Norveška, se je med sedanjo preiskavo izkazalo, da so se okoliščine na norveškem trgu od takrat znatno spremenile.
Thus, domestic production in Norway decreased by around 20 % between 2005 and 2008 and imports of silicon in Norway represented 97 % of the domestic consumption.
Domača proizvodnja se je na Norveškem med letoma 2005 in 2008 zmanjšala za približno 20 %, pri čemer je uvoz silicija na Norveško dosegel 97 % domače potrošnje.
During the IP, there was only one domestic producer supplying the domestic market.
Med OP je domači trg oskrboval le en domači proizvajalec.
Therefore, Brazil, as suggested by both applicants, was envisaged as an appropriate market economy third country in the notice of initiation.
Zato je bila v obvestilu o začetku na predlog obeh vložnikov kot ustrezna tretja država s tržnim gospodarstvom izbrana Brazilija.
Indeed, the investigation revealed that Brazil is the second largest world producer of silicon after the PRC and that the Brazilian market is highly competitive with 7 silicon producers present, producing several different grades of silicon.
Preiskava je dejansko pokazala, da je Brazilija takoj za LRK druga največja svetovna proizvajalka silicija in da je brazilski trg zelo konkurenčen, saj ima sedem proizvajalcev silicija, ki proizvajajo več različnih razredov silicija.
Brazil was also considered to be an open market with significant import volumes mostly from the PRC.
Brazilija se je obravnavala tudi kot odprt trg z znatnim uvozom zlasti iz LRK.
Although invited to do so, none of the interested parties commented on the choice of Brazil.
Čeprav so bile zainteresirane stranke pozvane k predložitvi pripomb glede izbire Brazilije, jih ni predložila nobena od njih.
Considering the above, on the basis of the information available at the time of selection, it was concluded that Brazil was the most appropriate analogue country.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je bilo na podlagi informacij, ki so bile na voljo ob izboru, ugotovljeno, da je Brazilija najustreznejša primerljiva država.
Three producers in Brazil cooperated by submitting information concerning cost and sales of silicon on the Brazilian domestic market.
Sodelovali so trije proizvajalci v Braziliji, ki so predložili informacije o ceni in prodaji silicija na brazilskem domačem trgu.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET was established on the basis of verified information received from these producers as set out below.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, določena na podlagi preverjenih informacij, ki so jih predložili ti proizvajalci, kot je določeno v nadaljnjem besedilu.
It was examined whether each type of the product concerned sold in representative quantities on the Brazilian domestic market could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preučeno je bilo, ali se za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka, ki je bila v reprezentativnih količinah prodana na brazilskem domačem trgu, lahko šteje, da je bila prodana v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
Depending on the product type, normal value was established based on weighted average sales prices of all sales or weighted average sales prices of profitable sales only, on the domestic market of the analogue country based on the verified data of three producers in that country.
Glede na vrsto izdelka je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi tehtanega povprečja prodajnih cen vseh prodaj ali tehtanega povprečja prodajnih cen samo dobičkonosnih prodaj na domačem trgu primerljive države na podlagi preverjenih podatkov treh proizvajalcev v navedeni državi.
IT company
Individualno obravnavana družba
All export sales to the European Union by the sole exporting producer granted IT were made through a related trader located in the PRC and subsequently resold to unrelated customers in the Union.
Ves izvoz edinega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu je bila odobrena IO, v Evropsko unijo je potekal prek povezanega trgovca s sedežem v LRK in se je pozneje preprodal nepovezanim strankam v Uniji.
In this case the export price was established on the basis of Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
V tem primeru je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi člena 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
The Union industry claimed that export prices were not freely determined within the meaning of Article 9(5)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Industrija Unije je trdila, da izvozne cene niso bile svobodno določene v smislu člena 9(5)(b) osnovne uredbe.
In particular, it was claimed that price ‘negotiations’ were ongoing between the Chinese customs authorities and the exporters in view of the determination of a ‘reasonable’ price level.
Zlasti je trdila, da so „pogajanja“ med kitajskimi carinskimi organi in izvozniki za določitev „razumne“ ravni cen še potekala.
However, the evidence submitted in this respect did not relate to silicon and it was also considered that these alleged ‘negotiations’ did not have an impact on the price charged to the final customer, which was the result of free negotiation between the parties.
Vendar predložena dokazila o tem niso bila povezana s silicijem, štelo pa se je tudi, da ta domnevna „pogajanja“ niso vplivala na cene, zaračunane končni stranki, saj sta se za ceno svobodno dogovorili stranki sami.
The Union industry further claimed that the company to which IT was granted was State-owned, received input subsidies and had significant trading activities which would permit circumvention of the measures.
Industrija Unije je nadalje trdila, da je bila družba z odobreno IO v državni lasti, je prejemala subvencije in opravljala znatno količino trgovinske dejavnosti, kar bi ji omogočilo izogibanje ukrepom.
However, the investigation revealed that the exporter in question was no longer State-owned during the RIP and therefore there was no State interference in its trading activities such as to permit circumvention of the measures.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da zadevni izvoznik med OPP ni bil več v državni lasti, zato se država v njegovo trgovinsko dejavnost ni vmešavala na način, ki bi mu omogočal izogibanje ukrepom.
As far as input subsidies are concerned, the claim was found to be unsubstantiated.
Za trditev v zvezi s subvencijami je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni utemeljena.
Claimed adjustments were made in respect of transport, physical characteristics, inspection costs, handling and packing where applicable and justified.
Zahtevane prilagoditve so bile izvedene v zvezi s prevozom, fizikalnimi lastnostmi, stroški nadzora, obdelavo in pakiranjem, kjer je bilo to ustrezno in upravičeno.
An adjustment was also made under Article 2(10)(i) given that the related trader was found to have functions of an agent working on a commission basis.
Izvedena je bila tudi prilagoditev na podlagi člena 2(10)(i), saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da je povezani trgovec opravljal naloge zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
The investigation revealed that export duties were levied on export sales of silicon during the IP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so se med OP za izvoz silicija zaračunavale izvozne dajatve.
As the duties had an effect on price comparability, it was considered appropriate to adjust the export price in accordance with Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation for other factors affecting price comparability.
Ker so vplivale na primerljivost cen, se je štelo, da je izvozno ceno v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe primerno prilagoditi drugim dejavnikom, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen.
It is noted that normal value and export price were compared at the same level of indirect taxation, i.e. VAT included.
Treba je opozoriti, da sta se normalna vrednost in izvozna cena primerjali na isti ravni posredne obdavčitve, tj. vključno z DDV.
It was claimed that the fact that the VAT paid on purchases of raw material of silicon was refundable should be reflected in the calculation of the normal value.
Trdilo se je, da je treba v izračun normalne vrednosti vključiti dejstvo, da se DDV, ki je bil plačan za nakup silicija kot surovine, lahko povrne.
However, the VAT paid on such purchases was found to be deductible regardless of the export VAT refund regime of the exported goods and regardless of the destination of the goods.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da se DDV, plačan za takšne nakupe, lahko odšteje ne glede na režim vračanja izvoznega DDV za izvoženo blago ter ne glede na namembni kraja blaga.
The fact that the VAT paid on purchases of raw material of silicon was refundable is thus a neutral factor which has no impact on the comparability of export price and normal value.
Zato je dejstvo, da se DDV, plačan na nakup silicija kot surovine, lahko povrne, nevtralen dejavnik, ki ne vpliva na primerljivost izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti.
It was also claimed that the methodology used to take account of indirect taxation was different from the one used in other cases and that the VAT on export sales should have been deducted from the export price.
Trdilo se je tudi, da je bila metodologija, uporabljena za posredno obdavčitev, drugačna od metodologije, uporabljene v drugih primerih, in da bi bilo treba DDV na izvoz odšteti od izvozne cene.
It is noted that Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation provides that an adjustment for indirect taxation may only be made to the normal value and in the circumstances described in the abovementioned Article, which are not present in the current case.
Treba je opozoriti, da člen 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe določa, da se prilagoditev za posredno obdavčitev lahko izvede samo za normalno vrednost in v pogojih iz navedenega člena, ki v tem primeru niso izpolnjeni.
For the IT company
Za individualno obravnavano družbo
The dumping margin for the sole exporting producer to whom IT was granted was established by comparing the weighted average ex-works export prices, by PCN to the respective normal value of the analogue country as established above.
Stopnja dampinga je bila za edinega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu je bila odobrena IO, določena na podlagi primerjave tehtanih povprečnih izvoznih cen franko tovarna v LRK z ustrezno normalno vrednostjo v primerljivi državi, kot je določena zgoraj.
The dumping margin for the sole exporting producer granted IT, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Union border, duty unpaid, is 16,3 %.
Stopnja dampinga za edinega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu je bila odobrena IO, izražena kot delež uvozne cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, je 16,3 %.
For all other exporters/producers
Za vse druge izvoznike/proizvajalce
In order to calculate the countrywide dumping margin applicable to all other non-cooperating exporters/producers in the PRC, the level of cooperation was first established.
Za izračun stopnje dampinga v celotni državi za vse druge nesodelujoče izvoznike/proizvajalce v LRK je bila najprej določena raven sodelovanja.
The degree of cooperation was low, i.e. less than 1 % of total imports from the PRC.
Stopnja sodelovanja je bila nizka, in sicer manj kot 1 % celotnega uvoza iz LRK.
Therefore, the dumping margin for the non-cooperating companies was established by comparing the average import value of silicon from China, as recorded in Eurostat, duly adjusted after excluding sales made by the IT company with the respective normal value of the analogue country as established above.
Zato je bila stopnja dampinga za nesodelujoče družbe določena na podlagi primerjave povprečne uvozne vrednosti silicija iz Kitajske, kot jo je evidentiral Eurostat in je bila ustrezno prilagojena po izključitvi prodaje družbe z IO, z ustrezno normalno vrednostjo v primerljivi državi, kot je določena zgoraj.
One party claimed that the level of cooperation was not correctly assessed as one cooperating exporter had exported significant quantities of silicon to the Union.
Ena stranka je trdila, da raven sodelovanja ni bila pravilno ocenjena, saj je en sodelujoči izvoznik v Unijo izvozil znatne količine silicija.
In those circumstances, it was claimed that the information from this exporter should have been used to calculate the countrywide dumping margin as was done in the review mentioned in recital 1.
V navedenih okoliščinah se je trdilo, da bi bilo treba informacije od tega izvoznika uporabiti pri izračunu stopnje dampinga na ravni države tako kot v pregledu iz uvodne izjave 1.
These claims had to be rejected on the grounds that the prices this company charged to its related company in the Union were found not to be made at arm’s length.
Te trditve je bilo treba zavrniti, ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da cene, ki jih je družba zaračunala svoji povezani družbi v Uniji, niso bile tržne.
Alternatively, it was argued that data provided by the cooperating importers should have been used to determine the countrywide dumping margin.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da bi bilo treba podatke, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči uvozniki, uporabiti pri določitvi stopnje dampinga na ravni države.
As mentioned in recital 54, a large part of the quantities imported by these cooperating parties were not made at arm’s length and therefore the prices were considered unreliable.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 54, so te sodelujoče stranke znaten del izdelka uvozile po netržnih cenah, zato se je štelo, da so cene nezanesljive.
The remaining imports were considered insufficiently representative in terms of quantities as to base the countywide duty upon.
Za preostali uvoz se je štelo, da ni bil izveden v zadostnih količinah, da bil osnova za dajatev na ravni države.
Following the disclosure, comments received with regard to the product mix of the normal value were taken into account in establishing the countrywide dumping margin.
Po razkritju so se pri določanju stopnje dampinga na ravni države upoštevale pripombe v zvezi z različnimi vrstami izdelkov normalne vrednosti.
The comparison was thus made using the information submitted by the cooperating importers as regards product types.
Primerjava je bila opravljena z uporabo informacij sodelujočih uvoznikov o vrstah izdelka.
On this basis, the countrywide dumping margin amounts to 19,0 % of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid.
Na podlagi tega je stopnja dampinga na ravni državi določena na 19,0 % cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve.
LASTING NATURE OF THE CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES AND LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OF DUMPING
TRAJNA NARAVA SPREMENJENIH OKOLIŠČIN IN VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA DAMPINGA