natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The GUAE submitted that the scheme under Federal Law No 1 of 1979 is broadly and horizontally available to all industrial sectors and enterprises in the UAE and is granted without any exemption.
Vlada ZAE je navedla, da je shema na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 splošno in horizontalno dostopna vsem industrijskim sektorjem in podjetjem v ZAE ter zagotovljena vsem brez izjem.
The cooperating exporting producer submitted that the licence issued under the Federal Law No 1 of 1979 constitutes the precondition to exist and operate in the UAE.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je navedel, da je dovoljenje, izdano na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979, predpogoj za obstoj in delovanje v ZAE.
With respect to the above it is noted that the investigation established that industrial undertakings in the UAE could operate under various types of licences.
Kar zadeva zgoraj navedeno, je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da so industrijska podjetja v ZAE lahko delovala z različnimi vrstami dovoljenj.
Indeed, apart from the licence granted under Federal Law No 1 of 1979, an industrial undertaking may operate under a licence issued by the regional authorities in the specific emirate where it is established.
Poleg dovoljenja, izdanega na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979, lahko industrijsko podjetje dejansko deluje z dovoljenjem, ki ga izdajo regionalni organi v emiratu, v katerem je sedež podjetja.
This was the case for the cooperating exporting producer who holds a licence issued by the Government of the Ras al Khaimah Emirate.
Tako je bilo v primeru sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, katerega dovoljenje je izdala vlada emirata Ras al Khaimah.
Furthermore, an industrial undertaking could operate under a Free Trade Zone where no licence is required under the aforementioned law.
Poleg tega je lahko industrijsko podjetje delovalo na območju proste trgovine, kjer ni potrebno nobeno dovoljenje na podlagi navedenega zakona.
Both parties argued that the requirements provided in the law are just the necessary preconditions for any industrial project to operate in the country and not to obtain the exemptions from payment of customs duties and thus the Commission’s analysis in the provisional Regulation of Articles 12, 13 and 21 of the Federal Law No 1 is erroneous.
Obe strani sta trdili, da so zahteve, ki jih določa zakon, le potrebni predpogoji za zagotovitev, da lahko kateri koli industrijski projekt deluje na podeželju in ni izvzet iz plačila carin, zato je analiza Komisije v začasni uredbi v zvezi s členi 12, 13 in 21 Zveznega zakona št. 1 napačna.
The GUAE also submitted that with respect to Article 13 the term ‘considered’ has no mandatory meaning in the Arabic version of the law.
Vlada ZAE je tudi navedla, da v zvezi s členom 13 izraz „se šteje za“ v arabski različici zakona nima zavezujočega pomena.
The GUAE also argued that Articles 11 and 12 of the aforesaid law were never applied in practice as the Technical Committee responsible for recommending to the Minister on the applications has never been established.
Vlada ZAE je tudi navedla, da se člena 11 in 12 navedenega zakona nista nikoli uporabila v praksi, ker tehnični odbor, odgovoren za priporočila ministru glede vlog, ni bil ustanovljen.
It was also submitted that the role of the Industrial Development Department is set out in the User Manual of the Electronic Industrial System issued by the Ministry, as mentioned in recital (173) of the provisional Regulation.
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da je vloga Oddelka za industrijski razvoj določena v uporabniškem priročniku elektronskega industrijskega sistema, ki ga je izdalo ministrstvo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (173) začasne uredbe.
It is noted that Articles 13 and 21 of the law form part of the step-by-step process foreseen in the analysis for the Industrial Licence under Federal Law No 1 of 1979.
Ugotavlja se, da sta člena 13 in 21 zakona del postopnega procesa, predvidenega v analizi za industrijsko dovoljenje na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979.
With respect to the definition of the word ‘considered’ in Article 13 of the Federal Law it is noted that the English version was the only text provided by the GUAE during the investigation.
Kar zadeva opredelitev izraza „se šteje za“ iz člena 13 Zveznega zakona, se ugotavlja, da je bila angleška različica edino besedilo, ki ga je vlada ZAE predložila med preiskavo.
Moreover, it only submitted subsequent to the provisional disclosure that there may be differences in definitions between English and Arabic texts.
Poleg tega je šele po začasnem razkritju navedla, da med angleško in arabsko različico morda obstajajo razlike v opredelitvah.
The fact that the two versions of the text raise doubts on certain parts of the eligibility criteria is again a clear indication that there is no legal clarity on the criteria and conditions governing the eligibility of the subsidy.
Dejstvo, da zaradi teh dveh različic obstajajo dvomi glede nekaterih delov meril o upravičenosti, je še en jasen pokazatelj, da v zvezi z merili in pogoji, ki urejajo upravičenost do subvencije, ni pravne jasnosti.
With respect to the role of the Industrial Development Department it is noted that no new information was submitted that could undermine the findings of the investigation.
V zvezi z vlogo Oddelka za industrijski razvoj se ugotavlja, da niso bile predložene nobene nove informacije, ki bi lahko spodbijale ugotovitve preiskave.
It is noted that the investigation has established that the granting of Industrial Licence under Federal Law No 1 of 1979 is not automatic and that the rules governing the granting process for choosing recipients are not objective.
Poudariti je treba ugotovitev preiskave, da odobritev industrijskih dovoljenj na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 ni samodejna in da pravila, ki urejajo postopek dodeljevanja za izbor prejemnikov, niso objektivna.
Account taken of the fact that the scheme was found to be specific in line with the provisions of Article 4(2)(a) and 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation, it was up to the GUAE to prove, in line with the provisions of Article 4(2)(c) of the basic Regulation, its claim that the requests from all parties that have submitted applications for Industrial Licence under Federal Law No 1 of 1979 since the enactment of the law have been approved.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je bila shema opredeljena kot specifična v skladu z določbami iz člena 4(2)(a) in 4(2)(b) osnovne uredbe, je morala vlada ZAE v skladu z določbami iz člena 4(2)(c) osnovne uredbe dokazati svojo trditev, da so bili od uzakonitve Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 odobreni zahtevki vseh strani, ki so predložile vloge za industrijsko dovoljenje na podlagi navedenega zakona.
No such verifiable information was ever provided.
Take preverljive informacije niso bile nikoli predložene.
Both parties claimed that all industrial undertakings in the UAE obtain customs duty exemptions for their production.
Obe strani sta navedli, da so vsa industrijska podjetja v ZAE izvzeta iz plačevanja carin za njihovo proizvodnjo.
The cooperating exporting producer also claimed that the WTO Trade Policy Review on the UAE, published in 2006, has analysed the Federal Law No 1 of 1979 and found that custom duties exemptions are granted to all industrial concerns.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je navedel tudi, da pregled trgovinske politike ZAE, ki ga je izvedla STO in je bil objavljen leta 2006, vključuje analizo Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 in ugotovitev, da so vsa industrijska podjetja izvzeta iz plačevanja carin.
It was also argued that there are controls of the system as Industrial Licences are renewed every year, companies under the scheme report the imported duty-free materials and authorities reject duty-free imports if inputs are not related to production.
Prav tako je bilo navedeno, da se izvaja nadzor nad sistemom, saj se industrijska dovoljenja vsako leto podaljšajo, družbe v okviru sheme poročajo o uvozu dajatev prostih materialov in organi zavračajo dajatev prost uvoz, če vložki niso povezani s proizvodnjo.
It is pertinent to note that customs duty exemptions are granted to companies availing of the scheme under Federal Law No 1 of 1979 and the normal customs duty rate for the raw materials is not zero.
Opozoriti je treba, da so iz plačevanja carin izvzete družbe, ki koristijo shemo na podlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979, in da običajna stopnja dajatev ni ničelna.
Indeed since there are no rules on the way requests to duty-free imports are accepted or rejected and in view of the absence of an effective verification system on the management of the scheme, it is unclear why one party at a certain time may be allowed to import duty-free while at some other date it may be refused to import duty-free.
Ker ni pravil, ki urejajo odobritve in zavrnitve zahtevkov za dajatev prost uvoz, niti učinkovitega sistema preverjanja upravljanja sheme, ni jasno, zakaj je eni strani na določen dan dovoljen dajatev prost uvoz, na nek drug dan pa se ji dajatev prost uvoz lahko zavrne.
In fact this was the case for the cooperating exporting producer who was requested from time to time to pay duties without any justification provided by the granting authority.
To se je dejansko zgodilo sodelujočemu proizvajalcu izvozniku, ki je moral včasih plačati dajatve, ne da bi pristojni organ predložil kakršno koli utemeljitev.
Therefore the two parties have failed to provide any evidence to corroborate their claims on the management of the scheme and allocation of duty-free imports.
Strani torej nista predložili dokazov, ki bi podprli njune trditve o upravljanju sheme in dodeljevanju dajatev prostega uvoza.
It was also submitted that the scheme is governed by objective criteria, namely the requirement that the duty exemption can only concern imported goods used for the industrial undertaking’s production.
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da shemo urejajo objektivna merila, in sicer zahteva, da se izvzetje iz plačevanja dajatev lahko dodeli le za uvoženo blago, namenjeno za proizvodnjo industrijskega podjetja.
This claim had to be rejected since, as it is explained under recitals (89) and (91) above, no such objective criteria have been demonstrated to exist.
To trditev je bilo treba zavrniti, ker obstoj takega objektivnega merila ni bil dokazan, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (89) in (91) zgoraj.
The GUAE submitted that the Federal Law No 1 of 1979 is under revision and that this information was provided to the Commission.
Vlada ZAE je navedla, da je Zvezni zakon št. 1 iz leta 1979 trenutno v reviziji in da je bilo to sporočeno Komisiji.
It was also argued that the Commission has disregarded the information and documents submitted by GUAE and did not provide arguments and positive evidence on the facts and law which led to its conclusions.
Vlada je prav tako navedla, da Komisija ni upoštevala njenih predloženih informacij in dokumentov ter ni predložila utemeljitev in trdnih dokazov o dejstvih in zakonodaji, na podlagi katerih je oblikovala sklepne ugotovitve.
With respect to the above it is noted that the Commission has closely evaluated and analysed all information provided by the parties.
V zvezi z zgoraj navedenim se ugotavlja, da je Komisija natančno ocenila in analizirala vse informacije, ki sta jih strani predložili.
The investigating authority is bound to analyze the actual legal provisions and the way these are implemented and not a non-binding draft that has not been approved by the administrative and legislative branches of the UAE and has not been enacted.
Preiskovalni organ mora analizirati dejanske zakonske določbe in način njihovega izvajanja, kar pa ne velja za nezavezujoči osnutek, ki ga upravna in zakonodajna oblast ZAE nista odobrili in uzakonili.
Even more importantly, the fact that the GUAE is currently working on a possible revision of the Federal Law No 1 of 1979 confirms that the authorities have realised that there is a need, as the GUAE has stated, to remove any inconsistency with the WTO Agreement on Subsidy and Countervailing Measures.
Kar je še pomembneje, dejstvo, da vlada ZAE zdaj obravnava možnost revizije Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 potrjuje, da so organi priznali potrebo, kot je navedla vlada ZAE, po odpravi vsake neskladnosti s Sporazumom STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih.
In the light of the above, the findings in relation to this scheme as set out in recitals (166) to (183) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se ugotovitve v zvezi s to shemo, kot so navedene v uvodnih izjavah (166) do (183) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
Free Trade Zone (FTZ)
Območje proste trgovine (OPT)
Both parties submitted that all enterprises in the UAE are granted duty-free imports of capital goods.
Obe strani sta navedli, da se vsem podjetjem v ZAE odobri dajatev prost uvoz investicijskega blaga.
In this respect it is noted that the investigation has established that companies established in the FTZ receive duty-free imports of capital goods.
V zvezi s tem je treba navesti ugotovitev preiskave, da se družbam, ustanovljenim v OPT, odobri dajatev prost uvoz investicijskega blaga.
The fact that one party may avail of the same benefit by using another scheme (namely the Federal Law No 1 of 1979) does not imply that the subsidy in question is not considered countervailable.
Dejstvo, da lahko ena stran koristi enake ugodnosti z uporabo druge sheme (in sicer Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979), ne pomeni, da se zadevna subvencija ne obravnava kot subvencija, proti kateri se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
Furthermore, the parties were not in a position to provide any factual evidence to rebut the findings of the investigation with respect to the FTZ.
Poleg tega strani nista mogli predložiti nobenih dejanskih dokazov, ki bi spodbijali ugotovitve preiskave v zvezi z OPT.
Account taken of the above, the submitted claim had to be rejected.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je bilo treba predloženo trditev zavrniti.
In the light of the above, the findings in relation to this scheme as set out in recital (184) to (199) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se ugotovitve v zvezi s to shemo, kot so navedene v uvodnih izjavah (184) do (199) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
Account taken the above, the definitive amount of countervailable subsidies in accordance with the provisions of the basic Regulation expressed ad valorem, for the sole cooperating United Arab Emirates exporting producer is 5,13 %.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je dokončni znesek subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe, izražen ad valorem, za edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika ZAE 5,13 %.
Comments on final disclosure
Pripombe na končno razkritje
It is recalled that all interested parties were given an opportunity to comment and make representations subsequent to final disclosure.
Poudarja se, da so vse zainteresirane strani imele možnost, da po končnem razkritju izrazijo in predstavijo pripombe.
Their comments were considered and taken into account where appropriate but they were not of a nature as to change the above findings.
Kjer je bilo ustrezno, so se pripombe zainteresiranih strani obravnavale in upoštevale, vendar niso bile takšne, da bi spremenile zgoraj navedene ugotovitve.
The Iranian cooperating exporting producer presented again its analysis of the facts of the case but did not provide any new conclusive evidence which would undermine the findings of the investigation.
Sodelujoči iranski proizvajalec izvoznik je ponovno predstavil svojo analizo dejstev o zadevi, vendar ni predložil nobenega novega prepričljivega dokaza, ki bi spodbijal ugotovitve preiskave.
The Government of Pakistan expressed dissatisfaction with the rejection of its undertaking with respect to the Manufacturing Bond scheme and repeated comments on the LTF-EOP scheme and FTR.
Pakistanska vlada je izrazila nezadovoljstvo glede zavrnitve njene zaveze glede sheme proizvodnje pod carinskim nadzorom ter ponovila pripombe v zvezi s shemama LTF-EOP in FTR.
It also submitted a new decision of the Federal Board of Revenue issued on 27 July 2010 setting the customs duty on imports of PTA (raw material used for PET) at the rate of 3 % and argued that the institutions were bound by law to recalculate the subsidy margin established for the Manufacturing Bond scheme.
Predložila je tudi novo odločitev zveznega odbora za prihodke, izdano 27. julija 2010, o določitvi carine na uvoz PTA (surovina za PET) po 3 % stopnji in trdila, da so institucije zakonsko zavezane k ponovnemu izračunu stopnje subvencije, določene za shemo proizvodnje pod carinskim nadzorom.
This had to be rejected because there is no indication that the subsidy does not continue to exist.
To je treba zavrniti, ker ni dokazil, da subvencija ne obstaja še naprej.
The Government of Pakistan claims that it is reduced.
Pakistanska vlada trdi, da je subvencija znižana.
Nevertheless, as per Manufacturing Bond scheme rules, input material may be used at least up to two years after importation.
Shema proizvodnje pod carinskim nadzorom kljub temu določa, da se vhodni material lahko uporablja vsaj dve leti po uvozu.
The Pakistani cooperating exporting producer disagreed with the analysis concerning FTR but the elements provided could not alter the findings of the investigation.
Pakistanski sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik se ni strinjal z analizo o FTR, vendar navedeni elementi niso mogli spremeniti ugotovitev preiskave.
It also submitted that there is verifiable evidence picturing accurately its income tax obligations and provided a set of documents to prove that the findings of the Commission are not accurate.
Prav tako je navedel, da obstajajo preverljivi dokazi, ki točno prikazujejo obveznosti v zvezi z davkom od dohodka, in predložil vrsto dokumentov v dokaz, da so ugotovitve Komisije napačne.
In this respect it is noted that the information provided is inconclusive and non-verifiable and thus it cannot be taken into consideration.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da so predložene informacije neprepričljive in nepreverljive, zato jih ni mogoče upoštevati.
The Government of the United Arab Emirates presented again its analysis of the facts of the case and argued that the institutions based their findings on an unclear interpretation of the Federal Law 1 of 1979 and failed to provide any positive evidence.
Vlada Združenih arabskih emiratov je ponovno predstavila svojo analizo dejstev o zadevi ter trdila, da so ugotovitve institucij temeljile na nejasni razlagi Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979, pri čemer institucije niso zagotovile nobenega pozitivnega dokaza.
In this respect it is recalled that specificity has been established in accordance with Articles 4(2)(a) and 4(2)(b) of the basic Regulation, that the interpretation of the Federal Law 1 of 1979 by the institutions was based on the submitted information, evidence and data and no conclusive evidence was found that could alter the findings of the investigation.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je bila določena specifičnost v skladu s členoma 4(2)(a) in 4(2)(b) osnovne uredbe, da so institucije svojo razlago Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 utemeljile na predloženih informacijah, dokazih in podatkih, pri čemer niso bili ugotovljeni nobeni prepričljivi dokazi, ki bi lahko spremenili ugotovitve preiskave.
GUAE clarified that the amendment process of the Federal Law 1 of 1979 has been advanced and it is reaching its final steps for promulgation.
Vlada ZAE je pojasnila, da postopek spremembe Zveznega zakona št. 1 iz leta 1979 napreduje in je v fazi izpolnjevanja zadnjih pogojev pred razglasitvijo.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission welcomes the efforts made by UAE to amend its relevant legal provisions but the aforesaid developments bear no impact on the findings of the investigation, as there is no clear timetable for the conclusion of the amendment process and the enactment of the new law.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da Komisija pozdravlja prizadevanje ZAE za spremembo ustreznih zakonskih določb, vendar navedeni razvojni dosežki ne vplivajo na ugotovitve preiskave, saj ni jasnega časovnega razporeda za zaključek postopka spremembe in uzakonitev novega zakona.
It was argued that the company realised following definitive disclosure that procurements of raw material made from Saudi Arabia bear no customs duty because UAE and Saudi Arabia form part of the customs union of the Gulf Cooperation Council and provided a set of documentation related to its claims.
Trdil je, da je družba po dokončnem razkritju ugotovila, da so naročila surovin, proizvedenih v Saudovi Arabiji, brez carin, ker sta ZAE in Saudova Arabija del carinske unije Sveta za sodelovanje v zalivu, ter predložil vrsto dokumentov v zvezi s svojimi trditvami.
In this respect it is noted that these representations form part of a totally new set of information that should already have been presented in the questionnaire reply or in the verification visit at the latest so that the Commission would have been able to verify the veracity of these claims.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da so te predstavitve del popolnoma novega sklopa informacij, ki bi že moral biti predstavljen v odgovoru na vprašalnik ali najpozneje pri preveritvenem obisku, tako da bi Komisija lahko preverila verodostojnost teh trditev.
Thus the data provided cannot be verified at this late stage of the investigation.
Tako predloženih podatkov v pozni fazi preiskave ni mogoče preveriti.
Moreover, there is also no conclusive evidence to corroborate these claims.
Poleg tega ni prepričljivega dokaza za potrditev teh trditev.
Furthermore it was argued that the benefit should be calculated on the basis of raw materials consumed during the IP and not on the basis of raw materials purchased.
Prav tako se je trdilo, da bi bilo treba dajatev izračunati na podlagi surovin, porabljenih v OP, in ne na podlagi kupljenih surovin.
In this respect it is noted that the split between raw materials consumed and purchased is irrelevant as the amount countervailed is the total amount attributable to the IP as explained in recitals (84) to (95) above.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da je ločevanje med porabljenimi in kupljenimi surovinami popolnoma nepomembno, saj je znesek, proti kateremu se je uvedel izravnalni ukrep, skupni znesek, ki se pripiše OP, kot je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah (84) do (95) zgoraj.
Union production, Union industry and Union consumption
Proizvodnja, industrija in potrošnja Unije
No comments have been received with regard to Union production, Union industry and Union consumption.
V zvezi s proizvodnjo, industrijo in potrošnjo Unije niso bile predložene nobene pripombe.
Consequently, recitals (201) to (206) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se uvodne izjave (201) do (206) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
No comments have been received with regard to the cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports concerned, the volume of imports from the countries concerned and their respective market share.
V zvezi s kumulativno oceno učinkov zadevnega uvoza, obsegom uvoza iz zadevnih držav in njegovim tržnim deležem niso bile predložene nobene pripombe.
Consequently, recitals (207) to (213) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se uvodne izjave (207) do (213) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Prices and price undercutting
Cene in nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen
Given that, as mentioned above at recital (20), it was decided to divide the product under investigation into several product types a new undercutting calculation reflecting that change was performed.
Glede na odločitev, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (20) zgoraj, da se izdelek v preiskavi razdeli na različne vrste izdelka, se je opravil nov izračun nelojalnega nižanja, ki upošteva to spremembo.