natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is noted that with regard to MEG, PET is not its only or even the major possible application and MEG producers are less dependent on the situation of the PET industry. Nonetheless, the difficulties of the PET industry may have some limited impact on the suppliers of MEG, at least in a short to medium term.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da v zvezi z monoetilenglikolom PET ni njegova edina ali glavna možna uporaba in da so proizvajalci monoetilenglikola manj odvisni od položaja industrije PET. Kljub temu lahko imajo težave industrije PET omejen učinek na dobavitelje monoetilenglikola, vsaj v kratkoročnem ali srednjeročnem obdobju.
Converters and the cooperating import agent also argued that measures could only bring a short term relief to the PET producers. They claimed that in the medium to long term, once the pre-form makers move out of the EU, there would be insufficient demand on the EU market for PET producers and the falling prices would ultimately force the PET producers to closures or relocation out of the EU.
Predelovalci in sodelujoči uvozni agent so tudi trdili, da bi lahko bili ukrepi le kratkoročna pomoč proizvajalcem PET. Trdili so, da bo v srednjeročnem in dolgoročnem obdobju, po selitvi proizvajalcev predoblik iz EU, na trgu EU nezadostno povpraševanje za proizvajalce PET in da bodo padajoče cene dokončno prisilile proizvajalce PET k zaprtjem ali selitvi zunaj EU.
They represent around 11 % of the Union consumption of PET in the IP. The format of the information provided does not allow identifying easily the number of staff directly involved in the production that uses PET.
Ti pomenijo okrog 11 % potrošnje PET v Uniji med OP.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 474/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 474/2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 475/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 475/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 470/2010 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 470/2010 [4].
OJ L 131, 29.5.2010, p. 29.
UL L 131, 29.5.2010, str. 29.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 1 June 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 1. junija 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 476/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 476/2010
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 1 June 2010
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 1. junija 2010
Import duties should be fixed for the period from 1 June 2010 and should apply until new import duties are fixed and enter into force,
Uvozne dajatve, ki se uporabljajo, dokler ne začne veljati nova določitev, se določijo za obdobje z začetkom 1. junija 2010 –
From 1 June 2010, the import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information contained in Annex II.
Od 1. junija 2010 so uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 dajatve, določene v Prilogi I k tej uredbi na podlagi podatkov, navedenih v Prilogi II.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 1 June 2010
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 1. junija 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 478/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 478/2010
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
On 8 September 2009, the Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (notice of initiation), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Republic of Korea (Korea) and Taiwan (the countries concerned).
Komisija je 8. septembra 2009 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske Unije [2] (obvestilo o začetku), razglasila začetek protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (LRK), Republike Koreje (Koreja) in Tajvana v Unijo (zadevne države).
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 27 July 2009 by CIRFS — European Man-made Fibres Association (the complainant) on behalf of producers of high tenacity yarn of polyesters representing a major proportion, in this case more than 60 % of the total Union production of high tenacity yarn of polyesters.
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 27. julija 2009 vložil Mednarodni odbor za svilo in sintetična vlakna (CIRFS) (pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 60 %, celotne proizvodnje preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v Uniji.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
Pritožba je vsebovala prima facie dokaze o dampingu tega izdelka in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo, da se upraviči začetek preiskave.
The Commission officially advised the complainant Union producers, other known Union producers, the exporting producers, importers, users, other parties known to be concerned, and representatives of the PRC, Korea and Taiwan of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila proizvajalce Unije, ki so se pritožili, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, uporabnike, druge strani, za katere je znano, da jih stvar zadeva, ter predstavnike LRK, Koreje in Tajvana.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predstavijo svoja stališča v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
The complainant, other Union producers, exporting producers in the PRC, Korea and Taiwan, importers and users made their views known.
Pritožnik, drugi proizvajalci Unije, proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK, Koreji in Tajvanu, uvozniki in uporabniki so izrazili svoja stališča.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers in the PRC and Korea and importers, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Koreji ter uvoznikov je bilo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all known exporting producers in the PRC and Korea and Union importers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi znani proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK in Koreji ter uvozniki Unije pozvani, naj se od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 javijo Komisiji in predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom, kot je navedeno v obvestilu o začetku.
As explained in recitals 22 to 27 below, eleven exporting producers in the PRC provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Kot je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah od 22 do 27, je enajst proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
With regards to Korea, four exporting producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Kar zadeva Korejo, so štirje proizvajalci izvozniki predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from the cooperating exporting producers, the Commission selected a sample of three exporting producers in the PRC or groups of related companies having the largest volume of exports to the Union.
Na podlagi prejetih informacij sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je Komisija izbrala vzorec treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK ali skupin povezanih družb, ki imajo največji obseg izvoza v Unijo.
In the case of Korea only four exporting producers provided the required information for the sampling exercise.
V primeru Koreje so potrebne informacije za izvedbo vzorčenja predložili le štirje proizvajalci izvozniki.
In view of the low number of exporting producers which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
Glede na majhno število proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so bili pripravljeni sodelovati, je bilo odločeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
In order to allow exporting producers in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (MET) or individual treatment (IT), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the sampled exporting producers in the PRC and to the exporting producers that requested such forms with the intention to apply for individual examination pursuant to Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Da bi proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK omogočila predložitev zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (TGO) ali individualno obravnavo (IO), če tako želijo, je Komisija vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK in proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so take obrazce zahtevali, da bi lahko zaprosili za individualno preiskavo v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe, poslala obrazce zahtevka.
They were also given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing if there were particular reasons to be heard.
Ti so imeli tudi možnost, da predstavijo svoja stališča v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje, če so zanj obstajali posebni razlogi.
Two exporting producers which were not included in the sample because they did not meet the criteria set in Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation claimed an individual margin pursuant to Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika, ki nista bila vključena v vzorec, ker nista izpolnjevala meril iz člena 17(1) osnovne uredbe, sta zahtevala individualno stopnjo v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
It was considered however that individual examination of the exporting producers concerned, would have led to additional on-the-spot visits and specific analysis, and would have thus been unduly burdensome and would have prevented the timely completion of the investigation.
Vendar se je presodilo, da bi individualna preiskava zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov privedla do dodatnih obiskov na kraju samem in posebne analize ter bi tako bila preveč obremenjujoča in bi onemogočila pravočasno dokončanje preiskave.
Therefore, it was provisionally concluded that the request for an individual examination of the said exporting producers could not be accepted.
Zato je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da zahteve za individualno preiskavo navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni mogoče sprejeti.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all the other companies that made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation, namely to four Union producers, ten importers and 68 users.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala vsem stranem, za katere je bilo znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim družbam, ki so se javile v rokih, določenih v obvestilu o začetku, to je štirim proizvajalcem Unije, desetim uvoznikom in 68 uporabnikom.
Replies were received from the complainant Union producers and one additional Union producer which supported this investigation, two unrelated importers and 33 users.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je prejela od proizvajalcev Unije, ki so pritožbo vložili, in enega dodatnega proizvajalca Unije, ki je podpiral to preiskavo, dveh nepovezanih uvoznikov in 33 uporabnikov.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a provisional determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za začasno ugotavljanje dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Producers in the Union:
Proizvajalci v Uniji:
Brilen SA, Barbastro, Spain,
Brilen SA, Barbastro, Španija,
Performance Fibers, Bascharage, Luxemburg and its related companies Performance Fibers Longlaville, Longwy, France; Performance Fibers GmbH, Bad Hersfeld Germany; Performance Fibers, Bobingen, Germany; Performance Fibers, Guben, Germany,
Performance Fibers, Bascharage, Luksemburg in njene povezane družbe Performance Fibers Longlaville, Longwy, Francija; Performance Fibers GmbH, Bad Hersfeld, Nemčija; Performance Fibers, Bobingen, Nemčija; Performance Fibers, Guben, Nemčija,
Polyester High Performance, Wuppertal, Germany,
Polyester High Performance, Wuppertal, Nemčija,
Sioen, Mouscron, Belgium.
Sioen, Mouscron, Belgija.
Importers in the Union:
Uvozniki v Uniji:
Protex Advanced Textiles GmbH, Rosendahl, Germany.
Protex Advanced Textiles GmbH, Rosendahl, Nemčija.
Users in the Union:
Uporabniki v Uniji:
Autoliv Romania SA, Brasov, Romania,
Autoliv Romania SA, Brasov, Romunija,
Guth & Wolf GmbH, Gütersloh, Germany,
Guth & Wolf GmbH, Gütersloh, Nemčija,
Michelin, Clermont Ferrand, France,
Michelin, Clermont Ferrand, Francija,
Mitas AS, Prague, Czech Republic.
Mitas AS, Praga, Češka republika.
Exporting producers in Taiwan:
Proizvajalci izvoznik v Tajvanu:
Related importers in the Union:
Povezani uvozniki v Uniji:
Hyosung Luxembourg SA, Luxembourg.
Hyosung Luxembourg SA, Luksemburg.
Performance Fibers, Inc. and Performance Fibers Operations, Inc., Richmond, USA.
Performance Fibers, Inc. and Performance Fibers Operations, Inc., Richmond, ZDA.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 (obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from January 2005 to the end of the investigation period (period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od januarja 2005 do konca obdobja preiskave (obravnavano obdobje).
The product concerned is high tenacity yarn of polyesters (other than sewing thread), not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of less than 67 decitex originating in the PRC, Korea and Taiwan (‘the product concerned’ or ‘HTY’) currently falling within CN code 54022000.
Zadevni izdelek je preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra (razen šivalne preje), ki ni pripravljena za prodajo na drobno, vključno z monofilamenti številke manj kot 67 deciteksov, s poreklom iz LRK, Koreje in Tajvana („zadevni izdelek“ ali „PVT“), trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN 54022000.
The product concerned features outstanding properties and is used in a number of diverse applications such as tyre reinforcement, broad fabrics, conveyor belts, safety belt ropes, nets and geo-synthetic products.
Zadevni izdelek ima odlične lastnosti in se uporablja za številne različne namene, kot so ojačitev pnevmatik, široke tkanine, transportni trakovi, vrvi za varnostne pasove, mreže in geosintetični izdelki.
During the course of the investigation, certain parties claimed that the yarn used in the production of tyres, the so called ‘High Modulus Low Shrinkage’ (HMLS) yarn, should be excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Med potekom preiskave so nekatere strani trdile, da bi morali prejo, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji pnevmatik, tako imenovano „visokomodulno nizko krčljivo“ prejo (HMLS) izključiti iz obsega preiskave.
They claimed that HMLS has different characteristics and applications compared to other HTY.
Trdili so, da ima HMLS drugačne lastnosti in namene uporabe v primerjavi z drugimi PVT.
The investigation, however, showed that, although HMLS yarn has some distinctive characteristics compared to other HTY, (e.g., modulus, shrinkage, tensile strength and fatigue resistance), the different types of the product concerned all share the same basic physical and chemical characteristics.
Preiskava pa je pokazala, da imajo vse različne vrste zadevnega izdelka enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti, čeprav ima preja HMLS nekatere posebne lastnosti v primerjavi z drugimi PVT (npr. modul, krčenje, natezna trdnost in odpornost proti utrujanju).
The product exported to the Union from the PRC, Korea and Taiwan, and the product produced and sold domestically in Korea and Taiwan as well as in the PRC by the Chinese exporting producer which was granted MET and also the one manufactured and sold in the Union by the Union producers were found to have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same uses.
Za izdelek, izvožen v Unijo iz LRK, Koreje in Tajvana, izdelek, ki ga kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu je bila odobrena TGO, proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu v Koreji in Tajvanu ter LRK in izdelek, ki ga izdelujejo in prodajajo v Uniji proizvajalci Unije, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enake namene uporabe.
They are therefore provisionally considered as alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno šteje, da so podobni v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In view of the large number of importers identified from the complaint, sampling was envisaged for importers in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko število uvoznikov, ugotovljeno na podlagi pritožbe, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za uvoznike v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, after examination of the information submitted and given the low number of importers which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
Vendar je bilo po proučitvi predloženih podatkov in glede na majhno število uvoznikov, ki so pokazali pripravljenost za sodelovanje, odločeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers in the PRC were requested to make themselves known within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to provide basic information on their export and domestic sales, their precise activities with regard to the production of the product concerned and the names and activities of all their related companies involved in the production and/or selling of the product concerned.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK pozvani, da se javijo v roku 15 dni od začetka preiskave ter predložijo osnovne informacije o svojem izvozu in domači prodaji, svojih natančno opredeljenih dejavnostih v zvezi s proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka ter imena in dejavnosti vseh povezanih družb, vključenih v proizvodnjo in/ali prodajo zadevnega izdelka.
The authorities of the PRC and the producers association, i.e. the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Textiles, were also consulted for the selection of a representative sample.
Za izbiro reprezentativnega vzorca so potekala tudi posvetovanja z organi LRK in združenjem proizvajalcev, tj. Kitajsko trgovinsko zbornico za uvoz in izvoz tekstila.
In total, eleven exporting producers, including groups of related companies in the PRC, came forward and provided the requested information within the given deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Skupaj se je javilo in predložilo zahtevane informacije v navedenem roku iz obvestila o začetku enajst proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključno s skupinami povezanih družb iz LRK.
All of them reported exports of the product concerned to the Union during the IP and expressed a wish to participate in the sample.
Vsi so poročali o izvozu zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v OP in izrazili željo po sodelovanju v vzorcu.
Thus, these eleven exporting producers were considered to be cooperating in the present investigation (cooperating exporting producers).
Zato se je za teh enajst proizvajalcev izvoznikov štelo, da sodelujejo pri sedanji preiskavi (sodelujoči izvozniki proizvajalci).
The comparison between Eurostat import data and the volume of exports to the Union of the product concerned reported for the IP by the companies mentioned in recital 25 suggests that the cooperation of Chinese exporting producers was very high as mentioned in recital 73 below.
Primerjava med podatki Eurostata o uvozu in obsegom izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, o katerem so za OP poročale družbe iz uvodne izjave 25, kaže, da je bilo sodelovanje kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zelo visoko, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 73.
Selection of the sample of cooperating exporting producers in the PRC
Izbira vzorca sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a sample based on the largest representative volume of exports of HTY to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
V skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe je Komisija izbrala vzorec na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza PVT v Unijo, ki ga je bilo mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
The sample selected consists of three companies or groups of related companies, representing more than 65 % of the total volume of exports to the Union of the product concerned.
Izbrani vzorec sestoji iz treh družb ali skupin povezanih družb, ki predstavljajo več kot 65 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, all exporting producers concerned, as well as their association and the authorities of the PRC, were consulted and agreed on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe so bili vsi zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki in njihovo združenje ter organi LRK s tem seznanjeni in so se strinjali z izbiro vzorca.
Two exporting producers which were not included in the sample because they did not meet the criteria set in Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation requested that an individual margin of dumping be established pursuant to Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika, ki nista bila vključen v vzorec, ker nista izpolnjevala meril iz člena 17(1) osnovne uredbe, sta zahtevala določitev individualne stopnje dampinga v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
As mentioned in recital 27 above, the sample was limited to a reasonable number of companies which could be investigated within the time available.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 27, je bil vzorec omejen na sprejemljivo število družb, ki jih je bilo mogoče preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
The companies investigated for the purpose of the investigation of dumping for the countries concerned are listed in recital 14 above.
Družbe, preiskane za namen preiskave dampinga za zadevne države, so navedene v uvodni izjavi 14.