natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If they can provide evidence that the charge was imposed on products imported from other Member States, the persons who paid the charge can claim the repayment of the proportion of the revenue from the charge intended to finance the part of the aid exclusively benefiting domestic products.
če lahko zavezanci za dajatev predložijo dokaz, da je bila ta dajatev obračunana za proizvode, uvožene iz drugih držav članic, lahko zahtevajo povračilo sorazmernega dela prihodka od dajatve, ki je bil namenjen financiranju tistega dela pomoči, do katerega so bili upravičeni izključno nacionalni proizvodi.
These claims for repayment shall be made within a time limit set in accordance with national law and in no case less than 6 months from the publication of this Decision.
Ti zahtevki za povračilo se vložijo v roku, ki se določi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in ki nikakor ne more biti krajši od šestih mesecev od datuma objave tega sklepa,
Portugal must establish the extent of any discrimination affecting imported products.
Portugalska mora ugotoviti obseg morebitne diskriminacije do uvoženih proizvodov.
To that end, Portugal must check, during a reference period, the financial equivalence between the amounts levied overall on domestic products by way of the charge concerned and the advantages from which these products exclusively benefit.
V ta namen mora preveriti, ali se zneski, ki so bili z obravnavano dajatvijo skupno obračunani za nacionalne proizvode, v referenčnem obdobju finančno ujemajo s prednostmi, ki so jih bili deležni izključno ti proizvodi,
Repayment must be made within a maximum time limit of 6 months from the submission of the request.
zneski morajo biti povrnjeni najpozneje šest mesecev od datuma vložitve zahtevka,
The amounts repaid must include interest calculated as from the date on which they were levied up until the date of actual repayment.
povrnjeni zneski morajo vključevati obresti, nastale od datuma, ko je bila dajatev plačana, do datuma dejanskega povračila.
This interest shall be calculated on the basis of the Commission’s reference rate laid down by the method for setting the reference and discount rates [54].The Portuguese authorities shall accept any reasonable evidence from the payers of the charge paid in respect of products from other Member States.
Te obresti se izračunajo na podlagi referenčne obrestne mere, predvidene z načinom določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj [54],portugalski organi sprejmejo vsak razumen dokaz, s katerim zavezanci izkazujejo zneske, ki so jih plačali v okviru dajatve na proizvode iz drugih držav članic,
The right to repayment cannot be made subject to other conditions, particularly that of the charge not having been passed on.
pravica do povračila ne more biti odvisna od drugih pogojev, zlasti ne od tega, da dajatev ni bila prenesena naprej,
Where the charge has not yet been paid, the Portuguese authorities shall formally waive payment of the proportion of the charge imposed on products imported from other Member States and intended to finance the part of the aid exclusively benefiting domestic products.
če zavezanec še ni plačal dajatve, se portugalski organi uradno odpovejo plačilu njenega sorazmernega dela, ki bremeni proizvode, uvožene iz drugih držav članic, in za katerega je bilo dokazano, da je namenjen financiranju tistega dela pomoči, do katerega so bili upravičeni izključno nacionalni proizvodi.
The Portuguese authorities shall also waive any interest on late payment of this part.
Odpovejo se tudi morebitnim pripadajočim zamudnim obrestim,
Where the Commission so requests, Portugal shall undertake to submit a full report proving the proper implementation of the repayment measure.
Portugalska se zavezuje, da bo predložila celovito poročilo, ki bo dokazovalo pravilno izvajanje ukrepa povračila, če bo Komisija to zahtevala,
If a charge with similar objectives has been imposed in another Member State on the same products which have been made subject to the charge in Portugal, the Portuguese authorities shall undertake to repay those persons who have paid the charge for that part of it which affected products from that other Member State.
če je bila za iste proizvode, ki so bili obremenjeni z dajatvijo na Portugalskem, v drugi državi članici odmerjena dajatev s podobnimi cilji, se portugalski organi zavezujejo, da bodo zavezancem povrnili tisti del dajatve, ki je bremenil proizvode iz te druge države članice,
Portugal undertakes to make this Decision known to all potential payers of the charge.
Portugalska se zavezuje, da bo s tem sklepom seznanila vse morebitne zavezance za dajatev.
The State aid granted by Portugal based on Decree-Law No 393-B/98 of 4 December 1998 is compatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, ki jo je dodelila Portugalska na podlagi zakonskega odloka št. 393-B/98 z dne 4. decembra 1998, je združljiva z notranjim trgom.
The State aid granted by Portugal based on Decree-Law No 197/2002 of 25 September 2002 and on the transitional scheme introduced by Article 3(2) of Decree-Law No 244/2003 of 7 October 2003 is compatible with the internal market, provided that Portugal repays those persons who have paid the charge for that part of it which affected products from other Member States between the date when the charge laid down in Decree-Law No 197/2002 was first imposed and the date when it was last imposed prior to the end of the transitional scheme introduced by Decree-Law No 244/2003.
Pomoč, ki jo je dodelila Portugalska na podlagi zakonskega odloka št. 197/2002 z dne 25. septembra 2002 in prehodne ureditve, določene s členom 3(2) zakonskega odloka št. 244/2003 z dne 7. oktobra 2003, je združljiva z notranjim trgom, če Portugalska zavezancem za dajatev povrne tisti njen del, ki je bremenil proizvode iz drugih držav članic med datumom začetka uporabe dajatve v skladu z zakonskim odlokom iz leta 2002 in datumom zadnje uporabe te dajatve pred iztekom veljavnosti prehodne ureditve, uvedene z zakonskim odlokom iz leta 2003.
This interest shall be calculated on the basis of the Commission’s reference rate laid down by the method for setting the reference and discount rates [55].
Te obresti se izračunajo na podlagi referenčne obrestne mere, predvidene z načinom določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj [55],
The Portuguese authorities shall accept any reasonable evidence from the payers of the charge paid in respect of products from other Member States.
portugalski organi sprejmejo vsak razumen dokaz, s katerim zavezanci izkazujejo zneske, ki so jih plačali v okviru dajatve za proizvode iz drugih držav članic,
The right to repayment cannot be subjected to other conditions, particularly that of the charge not having been passed on.
pravica do povračila ne more biti odvisna od drugih pogojev, zlasti ne od tega, da dajatev ni bila prenesena naprej,
Portugal shall inform the Commission, within a time limit of 2 months from notification of this Decision, of the measures it has taken to comply with it.
Portugalska v dveh mesecih od datuma uradnega obvestila o tem sklepu Komisijo obvesti o ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela za uskladitev z njim.
Done at Brussels, 13 July 2011.
V Bruslju, 13. julija 2011
Diário da República, I Series A — No 222 of 25 September 2002, p. 6535.
Diário da República, I Série A – št. 222 z dne 25. septembra 2002, str. 6535.
Decision C(2006) 576, notified to Portugal by letter No SG(2006) D/200772 dated 21 February 2006.
Odločba C(2006) 576, ki je bila Portugalski poslana z dopisom SG(2006) D/200772 z dne 21. februarja 2006.
OJ C 109, 13.5.2009, p. 9.
UL C 109, 13.5.2009, str. 9.
Diário da República, I Series A — No 280 of 4 December 1998, p. 6708.
Diário da República, I Série A – št. 280 z dne 4. decembra 1998, str. 6708.
Diário da República, I Series A — No 132 of 8 June 1999, p. 3171.
Diário da República, I Série A – št. 132 z dne 8. junija 1999, str. 3171.
OJ L 328, 28.11.1997, p. 1.
UL L 328, 28.11.1997, str. 1.
Diário da República, II Series — No 20 of 25 January 1999, p. 935.
Diário da República, II Série – št. 20 z dne 25. januarja 1999, str. 935.
Diário da República, II Series — No 82 of 6 April 2001, p. 6270.
Diário da República, II Série – št. 82 z dne 6. aprila 2001, str. 6270.
Diário da República, II Series — No 42 of 19 February 2002, p. 3158.
Diário da República, II Série – št. 42 z dne 19. februarja 2002, str. 3158.
OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 32.
UL L 303, 7.12.2000, str. 32.
Diário da República, I Series A — No 232 of 7 October 2003, p. 6603.
Diário da República, I Série A – št. 232 z dne 7. oktobra 2003, str. 6603.
Judgment in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003] ECR I-7747.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, C-280/00, Recueil, str. I-7747.
Joint Order No 96/99 of 25 January 1999; Joint Order No 324/2001 of 6 April 2001; and Joint Order No 124/2002 of 19 February 2002.
Skupni odloki št. 96/99 z dne 25. januarja 1999, št. 324/2001 z dne 6. aprila 2001 in št. 124/2002 z dne 19. februarja 2002.
OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1; Portuguese special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 9 p. 86.
UL L 282, 1.11.1975, str. 1. EE 03 F9 str. 86.
OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2.
UL L 307, 25.11.2005, str. 2.
OJ L 148, 28.6.1968, p. 24; Portuguese special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 2 p. 157; English special edition: Series I Chapter 1968(I) p. 187.
UL L 148, 28.6.1968, str. 24. EE 03 F2 str. 157.
OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77; Portuguese special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 9 p. 151.
UL L 282, 1.11.1975, str. 77. EE 03 F9 str. 151.
Altmark judgment, paragraph 84.
Zgoraj navedena sodba Altmark, točka 84.
Judgment in Case C-355/00 Freskot AE v Elliniko Dimosio [2003] ECR I-5263, paragraph 83.
Sodba z dne 22. maja 2003 v zadevi Freskot, C-355/00, Recueil, str. I-5263, točka 83.
Altmark judgment, paragraph 88 et seq.
Zgoraj navedena sodba, točka 88 in naslednje.
Judgment in Case C-209/98 Entreprenørforeningens Affalds/Miljøsektion (FFAD) v Københavns Kommune [2000] ECR I-3743, paragraph 75; see also the judgment in Case C-126/01 Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie v GEMO SA [2003] ECR I-13769, paragraph 21.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 23. maja 2000 v zadevi FFAD, C-209/98, Recueil, str. I-3743, točka 75. Glej tudi sodbo Sodišča z dne 20. novembra 2003 v zadevi GEMO, C-126/01, Recueil, str. I-13769, točka 21.
GEMO judgment, paragraph 26.
Zgoraj navedena sodba, točka 26.
GEMO judgment, paragraph 31.
Zgoraj navedena sodba, točka 31.
Judgment in Joined Cases C-261/01 and C-262/01 Belgische Staat v Eugène van Calster and Felix Cleeren and Openbaar Slachthuis NV [2003] ECR I-12272, paragraph 51.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. oktobra 2003 v združenih zadevah Van Calster in drugi, C-261/01 in C-262/01, Recueil, str. I-12272, točka 51.
Judgment of 13 January 2005 in Case C-174/02 Streekgewest Westelijk Noord-Brabant v Staatssecretaris van Financiën [2005] ECR I-85, paragraph 26.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 13. januarja 2005 v zadevi Streekgewest, C-174/02, ZOdl., str. I-85, točka 26.
Judgment in Case C-345/02 Pearle BV, Hans Prijs Optiek Franchise BV and Rinck Opticiëns BV v Hoofdbedrijfschap Ambachten [2004] ECR I-7139, paragraph 41; see also the judgment in Case T-136/05 EARL Salvat père & fils, Comité interprofessionnel des vins doux naturels et vins de liqueur à appellations contrôlées (CIVDN) and Comité national des interprofessions des vins à appellation d’origine (CNIV) v Commission of the European Communities [2007] ECR II-4063, paragraph 161 et seq.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. julija 2004 v zadevi Pearle in drugi, C-345/02, ZOdl., str. I-7164, točka 41. Glej tudi sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. septembra 2007 v zadevi EARL Salvat père et fils in drugi proti Komisiji, T-136/05, ZOdl., str. II- 4063, točka 161 in naslednje.
Judgment in Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities [1980] ECR 2671, paragraphs 11 and 12.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. decembra 1979 v zadevi Philip Morris Holland proti Komisiji, C-730/79, Recueil, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12.
Beef production figures in the EU-15 were 7691101 tonnes in 1999 and 7466476 tonnes in 2002, of which 95765 tonnes in 1999 and 105019 tonnes in 2002 were produced by Portugal.
Proizvodnja govedine in teletine v EU-15 je leta 1999 dosegla 7691101 tono, leta 2002 pa 7466476 ton; od tega je Portugalska leta 1999 proizvedla 95765 ton, leta 2002 pa 105019 ton.
Pigmeat production figures in the EU-15 were 17983476 tonnes in 1999 and 17729855 tonnes in 2002, of which 344209 tonnes in 1999 and 328038 tonnes in 2002 were produced by Portugal (source: Eurostat).
Kar zadeva svinino, je bilo v EU-15 leta 1999 proizvedenih 17983476 ton, leta 2002 pa 17729855 ton teh proizvodov, pri čemer je delež Portugalske leta 1999 znašal 344209 ton, leta 2002 pa 328038 ton (vir: Eurostat).
Judgment in Case T-55/99 Confederación Española de Transporte de Mercancías (CETM) v Commission of the European Communities [2000] ECR II-3207, paragraph 86); judgment in Case C-303/88 Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 27.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 29. septembra 2000 v zadevi CETM proti Komisiji, T-55/99, Recueil, str. II-3213, točka 86; sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji, C-303/88, Recueil, str. I-1433, točka 27.
Van Calster and Others judgment, paragraph 51.
Zgoraj navedena sodba Van Calster in drugi, točka 51.
Communication from the Commission — Services of general interest in Europe (2001/C 17/04) (OJ C 17, 19.1.2001, p. 4).
Sporočilo Komisije – Storitve splošnega interesa v Evropi (UL C 17, 19.1.2001, str. 4).
See point 194(c) of the Community guidelines for State aid in the agriculture and forestry sector 2007 to 2013 (OJ C 319, 27.12.2006, p. 1).
Glej točko 194(c) Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči v kmetijskem in gozdarskem sektorju 2007–2013 (UL C 319, 27.12.2006, str. 1).
Council Directive 82/894/EEC of 21 December 1982 on the notification of animal diseases within the Community (OJ L 378, 31.12.1982, p. 58).
Direktiva Sveta 82/894/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1982 o prijavljanju živalskih boleznih v Skupnosti (UL L 378, 31.12.1982, str. 58).
Judgment in Case 47/69 Government of the French Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1970] ECR 487, paragraph 20.
Sodba z dne 25. junija 1970 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, 47/69, Recueil 1969-1970, str. 391, točka 20.
See footnote 54.
Glej opombo 54.
The aforementioned period for a reply to be submitted expired in May 2005.
Zgoraj navedeni rok za odgovor se je iztekel maja 2005.
Since no reply was received within that period, the Commission, by Decision of 21 February 2006 [3], called upon Portugal to provide all the information requested, stipulating that, should the Portuguese authorities fail to reply, it reserved the right to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU (see paragraph 80 of the information injunction).
Ker Komisija do izteka tega roka ni prejela odgovora, je z odločbo z dne 21. februarja 2006 [3] Portugalski odredila, naj ji predloži vse zahtevane podatke, pri čemer je pojasnila, da bo, če od portugalskih organov ne bo prejela odgovora, sprožila postopek iz člena 108(2) PDEU (glej odstavek 80 odredbe o predložitvi podatkov).
As no comments were received from Portugal within the prescribed period, on 18 March 2009 the Commission sent an official reminder to the Portuguese authorities.
Ker Komisija v predpisanem roku od Portugalske ni prejela pripomb, ji je z dopisom z dne 18. marca 2009 poslala opomin.
On 14 April 2009 Portugal sent its comments to the Commission and also provided a copy of Decree-Laws No 393-B/98 and No 244/2003.
Portugalska je 14. aprila 2009 Komisiji poslala svoje pripombe, predložila pa je tudi kopiji zakonskih odlokov št. 393-B/98 in št. 244/2003.
According to the information provided by the Portuguese authorities, the parameters used to calculate the compensation for the services provided were established beforehand by Joint Order No 96/99 of 25 January 1999 [9].
Po podatkih portugalskih organov so bili parametri, ki so bili uporabljeni kot podlaga za izračun nadomestila za zadevne storitve, vnaprej določeni s skupnim odlokom št. 96/99 z dne 25. januarja 1999 [9].
The contents of this Order were periodically checked, and were amended by Joint Order No 324/2001 of 6 April 2001 [10] and by Joint Order No 124/2002 of 19 February 2002 [11].
Ta odlok je bil redno pregledovan ter spreminjan s skupnima odlokoma št. 324/2001 z dne 6. aprila 2001 [10] in št. 124/2002 z dne 19. februarja 2002 [11].
With regard to Category 1 and 2 material, slaughterhouses and cutting plants had to submit a destruction or use plan within 30 days of the end of the transitional scheme in November 2005.
Za snovi kategorij 1 in 2 so morale klavnice in razsekovalnice predložiti načrt za uničevanje ali uporabo v 30 dneh po izteku veljavnosti prehodne ureditve novembra 2005.
Until the plan was approved, they had to pay EUR 0,35 per kilogram of Category 1 or 2 material.
Pred odobritvijo načrta so morale plačevati 0,35 EUR/kg snovi kategorij 1 ali 2.
The transitional scheme under Decree-Law No 244/2003 expired in November 2005.
Prehodna ureditev, določena v zakonskem odloku iz leta 2003, je prenehala veljati novembra 2005.
By letter of 1 April 2011, the Portuguese authorities stated that, after the expiry of the transitional scheme under Decree-Law No 244/2003, the cost of the operations to destroy the by-products of slaughterhouses and cutting plants was passed on to operators through waste recovery, conversion into biofuels, and export of meal.
Portugalski organi so v dopisu z dne 1. aprila 2011 navedli, da od izteka veljavnosti prehodne ureditve, predvidene v zakonskem odloku iz leta 2003, stroške dejavnosti uničevanja stranskih proizvodov klavnic in razsekovalnic krijejo subjekti z iztržki od odpadkov, ki se predelujejo v biogoriva, in z izvozom moke.
Overheads, such as energy, fuel, wage, insurance and other costs, were also taken into account. These parameters were the same for all service-providers.
Prav tako so bili upoštevani tekoči stroški, kot so stroški energije, goriva, plač, zavarovanj itd. Ti parametri so bili enaki za vse ponudnike storitev.
ETSA submitted its comments by letter of 15 June 2009.
Skupina ETSA je predložila pripombe z dopisom z dne 15. junija 2009.
The ETSA group consists of the following undertakings: ITS — Indústria Transformadora de Subprodutos Animais, SA and SEBOL — Comércio e Indústria de Sebo, SA.
To skupino sestavljata podjetji ITS – Indústria Transformadora de Subprodutos Animais, SA, in SEBOL – Comércio e Indústria de Sebo, SA.
Up to 10 October 2002, INGA contracted undertakings licensed to provide this type of service and bore the resulting costs, as laid down in Article 6 of Decree-Law No 393-B/98.
Do 10. oktobra 2002 je bil zavod INGA zadolžen za izbiro podjetij, ki so imela dovoljenje za opravljanje te vrste storitev, in je nosil pripadajoče stroške, kot je določal člen 6 zakonskega odloka iz leta 1998.
The parameters used to calculate the price to be paid for the service were established by Joint Order No 96/99.
Parametri za izračun nadomestila so bili opredeljeni s skupnim odlokom št. 96/99.
The public payments were made to specific undertakings, i.e. to undertakings entrusted with the service.
Javna plačila so prejela določena podjetja, in sicer tista, ki so bila zadolžena za storitve.
As a result, it can be considered that the measure in question is specific.
Tako se zadevni ukrep lahko šteje za posebnega.
The Commission notes that the two invoices submitted by the Portuguese authorities do indicate that the charge based on Decree-Law No 197/2002 and Decree-Law No 244/2003 was passed on by one of the slaughterhouses in October 2002 and October 2003.
Komisija ugotavlja, da računa, ki so ju predložili portugalski organi, v resnici kažeta na to, da je ena od klavnic oktobra 2002 in oktobra 2003 na rejce prenesla dajatev na podlagi zakonskega odloka iz leta 2002 in zakonskega odloka iz leta 2003.
The assertion by the Portuguese authorities that, in accordance with market laws, the costs were passed on to the whole sector, including livestock farmers, is corroborated by the documents submitted.
Predloženi dokumenti potrjujejo trditev portugalskih organov, da so bili stroški v skladu s tržnimi zakoni preneseni na celoten sektor.
In this respect, it should be recalled that, in accordance with settled case-law [44], an aid may be of such a kind as to affect trade between Member States and distort competition even if the recipient undertaking, which is in competition with producers in other Member States, does not itself export its products.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da lahko v skladu s sodno prakso [44] pomoč prizadene trgovino med državami članicami in izkrivlja konkurenco, tudi če se podjetje, ki je prejelo pomoč in ki je konkurenčno proizvajalcem iz drugih držav članic, sámo ne ukvarja z izvozom.
Where a Member State grants aid to an undertaking, internal supply may thereby be maintained or increased, with the consequence that the opportunities for undertakings established in other Member States to offer their services to the market of that Member State are reduced.
Kadar namreč država članica dodeli pomoč podjetju, se lahko notranja ponudba zato ohrani na isti ravni ali poveča, medtem ko se možnosti podjetij s sedeži v drugih državah članicah za ponujanje svojih storitev na trgu te države članice zmanjšajo.
These guidelines applied between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 [51].
Te smernice so bile veljavne od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2006 [51].
Point 44 of the latter guidelines establishes a derogation from the principle that unlawful aid must be assessed in accordance with the rules applicable at the time when it was granted, in particular for cases involving slaughterhouse waste.
V točki 44 smernic TSE je predvidena izjema od načela, da je treba nezakonito pomoč oceniti v skladu s pravili in smernicami, ki veljajo ob dodelitvi pomoči, in sicer zlasti za primere v zvezi s klavniškimi odpadki.
According to point 47 of those guidelines, the Commission will apply principles based on point 11.4 of the Guidelines to unlawful aid for slaughterhouse waste granted up to the end of 2002.
V skladu s točko 47 smernic TSE bo Komisija uporabila načela, ki temeljijo na točki 11.4 kmetijskih smernic, za nezakonito pomoč v zvezi s klavniškimi odpadki, dodeljeno pred koncem leta 2002.
As a result, point 47 of the TSE guidelines is the relevant legal basis for assessing the aid granted from 1999.
Zato je točka 47 smernic TSE ustrezna pravna podlaga za oceno pomoči, dodeljene od leta 1999.
Having invited interested parties to submit their comments in accordance with that Article [2],
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo pripombe v skladu z navedenim členom [2],
Following complaints received in January and February 2004, the Commission undertook a preliminary examination of the aid granted by Belgium to cover the costs of screening tests for BSE in bovine animals.
Komisija je po prejetju pritožb januarja in februarja 2004 opravila predhodno preiskavo pomoči, ki jo je Belgija dodelila za pokrivanje stroškov testiranja na transmisivno spongiformno encefalopatijo pri govedu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: testi na BSE).
Following those complaints, the Commission sent a letter to the Belgian authorities on 27 January 2004, asking for information on the measure in question.
Na podlagi teh pritožb je Komisija belgijskim organom 27. januarja 2004 poslala dopis, v katerem je zahtevala podatke o zadevnem ukrepu.
At the same time, an aid measure to finance screening for TSE in animals was notified by the Belgian authorities in accordance with Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) (by letter of 23 January 2004, registered on 28 January 2004) and entered under the number N 54/04.
Hkrati so belgijski organi v skladu s členom 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU) (z dopisom z dne 23. januarja 2004, evidentiranim 28. januarja 2004) priglasili ukrep pomoči za financiranje testiranja na transmisivno spongiformno encefalopatijo (TSE), vpisan pod številko N 54/04.