natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Further guidance and explanation in relation to the data sought in the Table are given in notes below.
Nadaljnje smernice in razlage v zvezi s podatki, ki jih je treba navesti v tabelah, so v opombah spodaj.
Member States are requested to complete the Table as far as possible.
Države članice morajo izpolniti tabelo čim bolj natančno.
NUMBER OF INSTALLATIONS
ŠTEVILO OBRATOV
Number of IPPC installations: total number of installations (both existing and new) operating in the Member States at the end of the reporting period regardless of the status of their permitting.
Število obratov IPPC: skupno število obratov (obstoječih in novih), ki delujejo v državah članicah na koncu poročevalnega obdobja, ne glede na status njihovega dovoljenja.
Number of installations covered by a permit which is in full compliance with the Directive: total number of IPPC installations covered by one or more permits granted in accordance with the IPPC Directive (including pre-IPPC permits which have been reconsidered/updated) regardless of when the permit(s) had been issued or whether the permit has been reconsidered, updated, or amended/renewed due to any reason.
Število obratov, zajetih v dovoljenju, ki je popolnoma skladno z Direktivo: skupno število obratov IPPC, ki so zajeti v enem ali več dovoljenjih, dodeljenih v skladu z Direktivo IPPC (vključno z dovoljenji, ki so bila izdana pred IPPC, in so bila ponovno preverjena/posodobljena), ne glede na to, kdaj so bila izdana ali če je bilo dovoljenje iz katerega koli razloga ponovno preverjeno, posodobljeno ali spremenjeno/obnovljeno.
For counting the number of installations to be reported Member States shall consider the status of the permit(s) covering each installation at the end of the reporting period.
Države članice pri štetju števila obratov, o katerih je treba poročati, upoštevajo status dovoljenja, ki zajema vsak obrat na koncu poročevalnega obdobja.
Please note that the numbers refer to installations, not permits (acknowledging that one installation may be covered by several permits and vice versa).
Upoštevajte, da se številke nanašajo na obrate, ne dovoljenja (en obrat je lahko zajet v več dovoljenjih in obratno).
Consistency rule: 1 minus 2 shall be equal to the number of installations which are not covered by a fully compliant IPPC permit for any reason (procedure not concluded, not full coverage of all activities, etc.).
Pravilo o doslednosti: 1 minus 2 je enako številu obratov, ki iz katerega koli vzroka niso zajeti v popolnoma ustreznem dovoljenju IPPC (postopek ni zaključen, vse dejavnosti niso popolnoma zajete itn.).
Where this figure is different from zero, this indicates a potential breach of the IPPC provisions.
Kadar ta številka ni enaka nič, to nakazuje morebitno kršitev določb IPPC.
Number of substantial changes undertaken during the reporting period without a permit according to Article 12(2): number of substantial changes known to the competent authorities which were effectively implemented by the operators without a permit as required pursuant to Article 12(2).
Število znatnih sprememb, izvedenih v poročevalnem obdobju brez dovoljenja v skladu s členom 12(2): število znatnih sprememb, ki so pristojnim organom poznane in jih upravljavci učinkovito izvajajo brez dovoljenja, kot se zahteva v členu 12(2).
Number of IPPC installations for which the IPPC permit has been reconsidered during the reporting period in accordance with Article 13: total number of installations covered by one or more permits which have been reconsidered in accordance with Article 13.
Število obratov IPPC, za katere se je v poročevalnem obdobju ponovno preverilo dovoljenje IPPC v skladu s členom 13: skupno število obratov, zajetih v enem ali več dovoljenjih, ki so bila ponovno preverjena v skladu s členom 13.
Number of IPPC installations for which the IPPC permit has been updated during the reporting period in accordance with Article 13: total number of installations covered by one or more permits which have been updated in accordance with Article 13.
Število obratov IPPC, za katere se je v poročevalnem obdobju posodobilo dovoljenje IPPC v skladu s členom 13: skupno število obratov, zajetih v enem ali več dovoljenjih, ki so bila posodobljena v skladu s členom 13.
This fourth questionnaire under Directive 2008/1/EC covers the period 2009 to 2011.
Četrti vprašalnik v skladu z Direktivo 2008/1/ES zajema obdobje od leta 2009 do 2011.
In view of the experience gained in the implementation of the Directive and the information already obtained through the first three questionnaires, the present questionnaire focuses on the changes and progress made by Member States in the actual implementation of the Directive.
Glede na izkušnje, dobljene z izvajanjem Direktive, in informacije, ki so bile dobljene na podlagi prvih treh vprašalnikov, je sedanji vprašalnik usmerjen k spremembam in napredku držav članic pri dejanskem izvajanju Direktive.
Identification of IPPC installations.
Identifikacija obratov IPPC.
If available, please provide a link to publicly accessible up-to-date information containing the names, location and main activity (Annex I) of the IPPC installations in your Member State.
Če so na voljo, navedite javno dostopne posodobljene informacije, ki zajemajo imena, lego in glavno dejavnost (Priloga I) obratov IPPC v vaši državi članici.
of 30 November 2010
z dne 30. novembra 2010
on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agency of Estonia concerning expenditure in the field of rural development measures financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) for the 2009 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov plačilne agencije Estonije v zvezi z izdatki za ukrepe za razvoj podeželja, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS), za proračunsko leto 2009
(notified under document C(2010) 8275)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8275)
Commission Decision 2010/257/EU [2] cleared, for the 2009 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the Estonian paying agency ‘PRIA’.
S Sklepom Komisije 2010/257/EU [2] so bili za proračunsko leto 2009 potrjeni obračuni vseh plačilnih agencij razen obračunov estonske plačilne agencije PRIA.
Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision concerning expenditure in the field of rural development measures on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the Estonian paying agency ‘PRIA’.
Po prejetju novih informacij in dodatnih preverjanjih lahko Komisija zdaj v zvezi z izdatki na področju ukrepov za razvoj podeželja sprejme sklep o celovitosti, točnosti in verodostojnosti obračunov, ki jih je predložila estonska plačilna agencija PRIA.
The accounts of the Estonian paying agency ‘PRIA’ concerning expenditure in the field of rural development measures financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), in respect of the 2009 financial year, are hereby cleared.
Obračuni estonske plačilne agencije PRIA v zvezi z izdatki na področju ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS), za proračunsko leto 2009 se s tem sklepom potrdijo.
The amounts which are recoverable from, or payable to, the Member State pursuant to this Decision in the field of rural development measures applicable in Estonia are set out in Annex I and Annex II.
Zneski, ki se izterjajo od države članice ali plačajo državi članici v skladu s tem sklepom na področju ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, ki se uporabljajo v Estoniji, so določeni v prilogah I in II.
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2010.
V Bruslju, 30. novembra 2010
OJ L 112, 5.5.2010, p. 10.
UL L 112, 5.5.2010, str. 10.
FINANCIAL YEAR 2009 — EAGF RURAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE IN NEW MEMBER STATES
PRORAČUNSKO LETO 2009 – IZDATKI EKJS ZA RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA V NOVIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH
2009 — Expenditure for the paying agencies for which the accounts are
2009 – Izdatek za plačilne agencije, katerih obračuni so
Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State [1]
Znesek za izterjavo (–) od države članice ali plačilo (+) državi članici [1]
= total of interim payments reimbursed to the Member State for the financial year
= vsota vmesnih plačil, povrnjenih državi članici za proračunsko leto
As payments have reached 95 % of the financial plan, the balance will be settled during the closure of the programme.
Ker so plačila dosegla 95 % finančnega načrta, se preostali znesek poravna ob zaključku programa.
Expenditure 2009 Annex I column ‘a’
Izdatki 2009 Priloga I stolpec „a“
Reductions Annex I column ‘d’
Znižanje Priloga I stolpec „d“
Amount cleared for 2009 Annex I column ‘e’
Potrjeni znesek za 2009 Priloga I stolpec „e“
Complements in direct payments
Dopolnila neposrednih plačil
on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies in Germany concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) for the 2009 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov nekaterih plačilnih agencij Nemčije v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS), za proračunsko leto 2009
(notified under document C(2010) 8277)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8277)
Commission Decision 2010/258/EU [2] cleared, for the 2009 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the German paying agencies ‘Baden-Württemberg’, ‘Hessen’, ‘IBH’ and ‘Helaba’, the Italian paying agencies ‘AGEA’ and ‘ARBEA’, and the Romanian paying agency ‘PIAA’.
S Sklepom Komisije 2010/258/EU [2] so bili za proračunsko leto 2009 potrjeni obračuni vseh plačilnih agencij razen obračunov nemških plačilnih agencij Baden-Württemberg, Hessen, IBH in Helaba, italijanskih plačilnih agencij AGEA in ARBEA ter romunske plačilne agencije PIAA.
Following the transmission of new information and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the German paying agencies ‘Baden-Württemberg’, ‘Hessen’, ‘IBH’ and ‘Helaba’.
Po prejemu novih podatkov in po dodatnih preverjanjih lahko Komisija zdaj sprejme sklep o celovitosti, točnosti in verodostojnosti obračunov, ki so jih predložile nemške plačilne agencije Baden-Württemberg, Hessen, IBH in Helaba.
The first subparagraph of Article 10(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD [3] lays down that the amounts that are recoverable from, or payable to, each Member State, in accordance with the accounts clearance decision referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the said Regulation, shall be determined by deducting the monthly payments in respect of the financial year in question, i.e. 2009, from expenditure recognised for that year in accordance with paragraph 1.
Prvi pododstavek člena 10(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 885/2006 z dne 21. junija 2006 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 glede akreditacije plačilnih agencij in drugih organov ter potrditve obračunov Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada (EKJS) in Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) [3] določa, da se zneski, ki se izterjajo od vsake države članice ali se ji plačajo v skladu s sklepom o potrditvi obračunov iz prvega pododstavka člena 10(1) navedene Uredbe, določijo tako, da se mesečna plačila glede na zadevno proračunsko leto, tj. 2009, odštejejo od izdatkov, priznanih za isto leto v skladu z odstavkom 1.
The Commission shall deduct that amount from or add it to the monthly payment relating to the expenditure effected in the second month following that in which the accounts clearance decision is taken.
Navedeni znesek Komisija odšteje ali doda mesečnemu plačilu za izvedene izdatke za drugi mesec po mesecu, v katerem sprejme sklep o potrditvi obračunov.
Pursuant to Article 32(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, 50 % of the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50 % by the Community budget if the recovery of those irregularities has not taken place within 4 years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within 8 years if the recovery is taken to the national courts.
V skladu s členom 32(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 zadevna država članica krije 50 % finančnih posledic zaradi neizvršene izterjave, ostalih 50 % pa je kritih iz proračuna Skupnosti, če se izterjava ni izvršila v štirih letih po datumu prve upravne ali sodne ugotovitve ali v osmih letih, če je izterjava v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodnimi organi.
This decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na prihodnje sklepe o uskladitvi v skladu s členom 32(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
This decision is without prejudice to future conformity decisions pursuant to Article 32(8) of the said Regulation.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na prihodnje sklepe o uskladitvi v skladu s členom 32(8) navedene uredbe.
In clearing the accounts of the paying agencies concerned, the Commission must take account of the amounts already withheld from the Member States concerned on the basis of Decision 2010/258/EU.
Pri potrjevanju obračunov zadevnih plačilnih agencij mora Komisija upoštevati zneske, ki so bili zadevnim državam članicam že odtegnjeni na podlagi Sklepa 2010/258/EU.
The accounts of the German paying agencies ‘Baden-Württemberg’, ‘Hessen’, ‘IBH’ and ‘Helaba’ concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), in respect of the 2009 financial year, are hereby cleared.
Obračuni nemških plačilnih agencij Baden-Württemberg, Hessen, IBH in Helaba v zvezi z izdatki, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad (EKJS), za proračunsko leto 2009 se s tem sklepom potrdijo.
OJ L 112, 5.5.2010, p. 17.
UL L 112, 5.5.2010, str. 17.
NB: Nomenclature 2011: 05 07 01 06, 05 02 16 02, 6701, 6702, 6803.
Opomba: Nomenklatura 2011: 05 07 01 06, 05 02 16 02, 6701, 6702, 6803.
2009 — Expenditure/assigned revenue for the paying agencies for which the accounts are
2009 – Izdatki/namenski prejemki za plačilne agencije, katerih obračuni so
Amount to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State [2]
Znesek za izterjavo (–) od države članice ali plačilo (+) državi članici [2]
Amount recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under Decision 2010/258/EU
Znesek, izterjan (–) od države članice ali plačan (+) državi članici na podlagi Sklepa 2010/258/EU
a = xxxxx – A (column i)
a = xxxxx – A (stolpec i)
b = xxxxx – A (column h)
b = xxxxx – A (stolpec h)
d = xxxxx – C1 (column e)
d = xxxxx – C1 (stolpec e)
e = xxxxx – ART32
e = xxxxx – ČLEN32
The reductions and suspensions are those taken into account in the payment system, to which are added in particular the corrections for the non-respect of payment deadlines established in August, September and October 2009.
Znižanja in začasne prekinitve so tisti, ki se upoštevajo v plačilnem sistemu, kateremu so dodani zlasti popravki zaradi neupoštevanja plačilnih rokov iz avgusta, septembra in oktobra 2009.
For the calculation of the amount to be recovered from or paid to the Member State the amount taken into account is, the total of the annual declaration for the expenditure cleared (column a) or, the total of the monthly declarations for the expenditure disjoined (column b).Applicable exchange rate: Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2006.
Znesek, ki se upošteva za izračun zneska za izterjavo od države članice ali plačilo državi članici, je skupni znesek iz letnega poročila za potrjene izdatke (stolpec a) ali skupni znesek mesečnih poročil za izvzete izdatke (stolpec b).Veljavni menjalni tečaj: člen 7(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 883/2006.
If the assigned revenue part would be to the advantage of the Member State, it has to be declared under 05 07 01 06.
Če so namenski prejemki v korist državi članici, jih je treba prijaviti pod 05 07 01 06.
If the assigned revenue part of the Sugar Fund would be to the advantage of the Member State it has to be declared under 05 02 16 02.
Če so namenski prejemki iz Sklada za sladkor v korist državi članici, jih je treba prijaviti pod 05 02 16 02.
Annex III to the said Regulation provides the model table that had to be provided in 2010 by the Member States.
V Prilogi III k navedeni uredbi je model tabele, ki so jo morale leta 2010 predložiti države članice.
establishing a questionnaire to be used for reporting on the implementation of Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the incineration of waste
o uvedbi vprašalnika, ki se bo uporabljal za poročanje o izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sežiganju odpadkov
(notified under document C(2010) 8279)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8279)
Having regard to Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste [1], and in particular Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2000 o sežiganju odpadkov [1] in zlasti člena 15 Direktive,
A first questionnaire to be used for reporting on the implementation of Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste was established by Commission Decision 2006/329/EC [2].
Prvi vprašalnik za poročanje o izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES o sežiganju odpadkov je bil uveden z Odločbo Komisije 2006/329/ES [2].
That questionnaire related to the reporting period 2006 to 2008 inclusive.
Ta vprašalnik se je nanašal na poročevalno obdobje od leta 2006 do vključno leta 2008.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established in accordance with Article 6 of Council Directive 91/692/EEC of 23 December 1991 standardising and rationalising reports on the implementation of certain Directives relating to the environment [3],
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so skladni z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 6 Direktive Sveta 91/692/EGS z dne 23. decembra 1991 o standardiziranju in racionaliziranju poročil o izvajanju določenih direktiv, ki se nanašajo na okolje [3] –
Member States shall use the questionnaire set out in the Annex for reporting on the implementation of Directive 2000/76/EC.
Države članice za poročanje o izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES uporabljajo vprašalnik iz Priloge.
Decision 2006/329/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2006/329/ES se razveljavi.
QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DIRECTIVE 2000/76/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL ON THE INCINERATION OF WASTE
VPRAŠALNIK O IZVAJANJU DIREKTIVE 2000/76/ES EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA O SEŽIGANJU ODPADKOV
In order to ensure continuity and enable direct comparisons to be made to previous responses, this questionnaire does not change the general approach contained in Decision 2006/329/EC.
Da bi se zagotovilo neprekinjeno izvajanje in omogočila neposredna primerjava s prejšnjimi odgovori, ta vprašalnik ne spreminja splošnega pristopa iz Odločbe 2006/329/ES.
In those cases where questions are similar to those of the previous questionnaire, reference can simply be made to the previous answers where the situation is unchanged.
Če so vprašanja podobna tistim iz prejšnjega vprašalnika in če se stanje ni spremenilo, se lahko navede le sklic na prejšnje odgovore.
As for the first questionnaire, the Commission intends to make use of the ReportNet platform (or its successor if this is the case) to make available to Member States an Electronic Reporting Tool based on this questionnaire.
Komisija namerava v zvezi s prvim vprašalnikom uporabiti sistem ReportNet (ali njegovega predhodnika, če je to potrebno), da bodo imele države članice na voljo elektronski sistem poročanja na podlagi tega vprašalnika.
Accordingly, the Commission strongly recommends its use for fulfilling this reporting requirement in order to reduce burdens and streamline the analysis of the responses.
Zato Komisija pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti poročanja zelo priporoča uporabo tega sistema, da se bodo zmanjšale obremenitve in poenostavila analiza odgovorov.
Number of plants and permits
Število naprav in dovoljenj
Please give the following information on the number of plants (broken down between incineration and co-incineration plants) that fall within the scope of Directive 2000/76/EC, as well as on their permits and permitted capacities:
Navedite naslednje podatke o številu naprav (razdeljene na sežigalnice in naprave za sosežig), ki spadajo na področje uporabe Direktive 2000/76/ES, ter o njihovih dovoljenjih in dovoljenih zmogljivostih:
number of plants;
število naprav;
number of permits issued in accordance with Article 4(1);
število dovoljenj, izdanih v skladu s členom 4(1);
number of plants that recover heat generated by the incineration process;
število naprav, ki zajamejo toploto, ki nastane med postopkom sežiganja;
total permitted capacities of waste throughput (tonnes/year) (optional).
skupne dovoljene zmogljivosti sežiganja odpadkov (v tonah na leto) (neobvezno).
Please provide a list of all plants falling within the scope of Directive 2000/76/EC, indicating the following information for each of those plants with a capacity of more than 2 tonnes per hour:
Predložite seznam vseh naprav, ki spadajo na področje uporabe Direktive 2000/76/ES, in za vse naprave z zmogljivostjo več kot 2 toni na uro navedite naslednje informacije:
whether it is an incineration or co-incineration plant and, for the latter, the type of plant (cement kiln, combustion plant, other industrial facilities not covered by Annex II.1 or II.2 to Directive 2000/76/EC);
ali gre za sežigalnico ali naprave za sosežig, pri čemer je treba pri napravah za sosežig navesti vrsto naprave (cementne peči, kurilne naprave, druge industrijske naprave, ki niso zajete v Prilogo II.1 ali II.2 k Direktivi 2000/76/ES);
for municipal solid waste incineration plants that carry out recovery operations falling in Annex II, R1 to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [1]: the energy efficiency of the plant, calculated using the formula provided in the footnote to Annex II, R1, of Directive 2008/98/EC.
pri sežigalnicah za trdne komunalne odpadke, v katerih se izvajajo postopki predelave iz točke R1 Priloge II k Direktivi 2008/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1], je treba navesti energetsko učinkovitost naprave, izračunano z uporabo enačbe iz opombe k točki R1 Priloge II k Direktivi 2008/98/ES.
Please describe any problems with the definitions in Article 3 identified when implementing Directive 2000/76/EC.
Opišite vse težave z opredelitvami iz člena 3, ki so bile ugotovljene pri izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES.
Provide specific information for each definition for which problems are identified.
Navedite podatke za vsako opredelitev, v zvezi s katero so bile ugotovljene težave.
Have any mobile plants received permits under Directive 2000/76/EC?
Ali so na podlagi Direktive 2000/76/ES dovoljenja dobile tudi premične naprave?
Please indicate the categories of waste that have been co-incinerated, broken down by the type of co-incineration plant (cement kilns, combustion plants, other industrial facilities not covered by Annex II.1 or II.2).
Navedite, katere vrste odpadkov se sosežigajo, in podatke razčlenite glede na vrsto naprave za sosežig (cementne peči, kurilne naprave, druge industrijske naprave, ki niso zajete v Prilogo II.1 ali II.2).
Please indicate the European Waste Catalogue codes (optional).
Navedite kode iz Evropskega kataloga odpadkov (neobvezno).
Please identify the permitted capacity granted for co-incineration in these plants (optional).
Navedite dovoljeno zmogljivost, odobreno za sosežiganje v teh napravah (neobvezno).
How many co-incineration plants do the emission limits provided in Annex V to Directive 2000/76/EC apply to (i.e. where co-incineration of untreated municipal waste is undertaken or more than 40 % of the heat release results from the combustion of hazardous waste)?
Za koliko naprav za sosežig veljajo mejne vrednosti emisij iz Priloge V k Direktivi 2000/76/ES (tj. kadar gre za sosežiganje nepredelanih komunalnih odpadkov ali kadar več kot 40 % toplote nastane zaradi izgorevanja nevarnih odpadkov)?