natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in the case of research and agreements referred to in point (a)(iv), (v) or (vi) of Article 1(1), the combined market share of the financing party and all the parties with which the financing party has entered into research and development agreements with regard to the same contract products or contract technologies, does not exceed 25 % on the relevant product and technology markets.
v primeru sporazumov o raziskavah in razvoju iz točke (a)(iv), (v) ali (vi) člena 1(1) skupni tržni delež pogodbene stranke, ki zagotavlja financiranje, in vseh pogodbenih strank, s katerimi je ta sklenila sporazume o raziskavah in razvoju v zvezi z enakimi pogodbenimi proizvodi ali pogodbenimi tehnologijami, ne presega 25 % upoštevnih proizvodnih in tehnoloških trgov.
After the end of the period referred to in paragraph 1, the exemption shall continue to apply as long as the combined market share of the parties does not exceed 25 % on the relevant product and technology markets.
Po izteku obdobja, navedenega v odstavku 1, ostane izjema v veljavi, če skupni tržni delež pogodbenih strank ne presega 25 % upoštevnega proizvodnega in tehnološkega trga.
The exemption provided for in Article 2 shall not apply to research and development agreements which, directly or indirectly, in isolation or in combination with other factors under the control of the parties, have as their object any of the following:
Izjema, predvidena v členu 2, ne velja za sporazume o raziskavah in razvoju, katerih cilj, neposredno ali posredno, samostojno ali v kombinaciji z drugimi dejavniki pod nadzorom pogodbenih strank, je karkoli od naslednjega:
the restriction of the freedom of the parties to carry out research and development independently or in cooperation with third parties in a field unconnected with that to which the research and development agreement relates or, after the completion of the joint research and development or the paid-for research and development, in the field to which it relates or in a connected field;
omejevanje svobode pogodbenih strank, da raziskave in razvoj izvajajo samostojno ali v sodelovanju s tretjimi osebami na področju, ki ni povezano s tistim, na katero se nanaša sporazum o raziskavah in razvoju, ali po zaključku skupnih raziskav in razvoja ali plačanih raziskav in razvoja na področju, na katero se te nanašajo, ali na področju, povezanem z njim;
the limitation of output or sales, with the exception of:
omejitev obsega proizvodnje ali prodaje, razen:
the setting of production targets where the joint exploitation of the results includes the joint production of the contract products;
določanja proizvodnih ciljev, če skupno izkoriščanje rezultatov vključuje skupno proizvodnjo pogodbenih proizvodov;
the setting of sales targets where the joint exploitation of the results includes the joint distribution of the contract products or the joint licensing of the contract technologies within the meaning of point (m)(i) or (ii) of Article 1(1);
določanja prodajnih ciljev, če skupno izkoriščanje rezultatov vključuje skupno distribucijo pogodbenih proizvodov ali skupno podeljevanje licenc za pogodbene tehnologije v smislu točke (m)(i) ali (ii) člena 1(1);
practices constituting specialisation in the context of exploitation; and
praks, ki pomenijo specializacijo v okviru izkoriščanja, ter
the restriction of the freedom of the parties to manufacture, sell, assign or license products, technologies or processes which compete with the contract products or contract technologies during the period for which the parties have agreed to jointly exploit the results;
omejevanja svobode pogodbenih strank, da proizvajajo, prodajajo, odstopajo ali licencirajo proizvode, tehnologije ali postopke, ki konkurirajo pogodbenim proizvodom ali tehnologijam v obdobju, za katero so se pogodbene stranke dogovorile za skupno izkoriščanje rezultatov;
the fixing of prices when selling the contract product or licensing the contract technologies to third parties, with the exception of the fixing of prices charged to immediate customers or the fixing of licence fees charged to immediate licensees where the joint exploitation of the results includes the joint distribution of the contract products or the joint licensing of the contract technologies within the meaning of point (m)(i) or (ii) of Article 1(1);
določanje cen ob prodaji pogodbenega proizvoda ali izdaja licenc za pogodbene tehnologije tretjim osebam, razen določanja cen, zaračunanih neposrednim strankam, ali določanja licenčnin, zaračunanih neposrednim pridobiteljem licenc, če skupno izkoriščanje rezultatov vključuje skupno distribucijo pogodbenih proizvodov ali skupno podeljevanje licenc za pogodbene tehnologije v smislu točke (m)(i) ali (ii) člena 1(1);
the restriction of the territory in which, or of the customers to whom, the parties may passively sell the contract products or license the contract technologies, with the exception of the requirement to exclusively license the results to another party;
omejevanje območja, na katerem lahko pogodbene stranke pasivno prodajajo pogodbene izdelke ali podeljujejo licence za pogodbene tehnologije, ali strank, ki jim lahko pogodbene stranke pasivno prodajajo pogodbene izdelke oziroma podeljujejo licence za pogodbene tehnologije, razen zahteve po podelitvi izključne licence tretji osebi;
the requirement not to make any, or to limit, active sales of the contract products or contract technologies in territories or to customers which have not been exclusively allocated to one of the parties by way of specialisation in the context of exploitation;
zahteva po popolni ali delni omejitvi aktivne prodaje pogodbenih proizvodov ali pogodbenih tehnologij na območjih ali strankam, ki niso bili izključno dodeljeni eni od pogodbenih strank na podlagi specializacije v okviru izkoriščanja;
the requirement to refuse to meet demand from customers in the parties’ respective territories, or from customers otherwise allocated between the parties by way of specialisation in the context of exploitation, who would market the contract products in other territories within the internal market;
zahteva, da se zavrne zadostitev povpraševanju strank na območju posamezne pogodbene stranke ali strank, ki so bile drugače razdeljene med pogodbene stranke na podlagi specializacije v okviru izkoriščanja, ki bi tržili pogodbene proizvode na drugih območjih znotraj notranjega trga;
the requirement to make it difficult for users or resellers to obtain the contract products from other resellers within the internal market.
zahteva, da se uporabnikom ali prodajnim posrednikom oteži pridobitev pogodbenih proizvodov od drugih prodajnih posrednikov znotraj notranjega trga.
The exemption provided for in Article 2 shall not apply to the following obligations contained in research and development agreements:
Izjema, ki jo določa člen 2, ne velja za nobeno od naslednjih obveznosti v sporazumih o raziskavah in razvoju:
the obligation not to challenge after completion of the research and development the validity of intellectual property rights which the parties hold in the internal market and which are relevant to the research and development or, after the expiry of the research and development agreement, the validity of intellectual property rights which the parties hold in the internal market and which protect the results of the research and development, without prejudice to the possibility to provide for termination of the research and development agreement in the event of one of the parties challenging the validity of such intellectual property rights;
prepoved, da bi po zaključku raziskav in razvoja pogodbene stranke izpodbijale veljavnost pravic intelektualne lastnine, ki jih imajo na notranjem trgu in ki zadevajo raziskave in razvoj, ali da bi po preteku veljavnosti sporazuma o raziskavah in razvoju spodbijale veljavnost pravic intelektualne lastnine, ki jih imajo pogodbene stranke na notranjem trgu in ki ščitijo rezultate raziskav in razvoja, brez poseganja v možnost, da se predvidi prenehanje sporazuma o raziskavah in razvoju, če ena od pogodbenih strank spodbija veljavnost teh pravic intelektualne lastnine;
the obligation not to grant licences to third parties to manufacture the contract products or to apply the contract technologies unless the agreement provides for the exploitation of the results of the joint research and development or paid-for research and development by at least one of the parties and such exploitation takes place in the internal market vis-à-vis third parties.
obveznost, da se tretjim osebam ne podeljujejo licence za proizvodnjo pogodbenih proizvodov ali uporabo pogodbenih tehnologij, če sporazum ne določa, da vsaj ena od pogodbenih strank izkorišča rezultate skupnih oziroma plačanih raziskav in razvoja in se to izkoriščanje izvaja na notranjem trgu v razmerju do tretjih oseb.
For the purposes of applying the market share threshold provided for in Article 4 the following rules shall apply:
Za uporabo mejnega tržnega deleža iz člena 4 veljajo naslednja pravila:
the market share shall be calculated on the basis of the market sales value; if market sales value data are not available, estimates based on other reliable market information, including market sales volumes, may be used to establish the market share of the parties;
tržni delež se izračuna na podlagi vrednosti prodaje na trgu; če podatki o vrednosti prodaje na trgu niso na razpolago, se lahko za določitev tržnega deleža pogodbenih strank uporabijo ocene, ki temeljijo na drugih zanesljivih tržnih informacijah, vključno s fizičnim obsegom prodaje;
the market share shall be calculated on the basis of data relating to the preceding calendar year;
tržni delež se izračuna na podlagi podatkov za prejšnje koledarsko leto.
the market share held by the undertakings referred to in point (e) of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2) shall be apportioned equally to each undertaking having the rights or the powers listed in point (a) of that subparagraph;
tržni delež podjetij, navedenih točki (e), drugega pododstavka člena 1(2) se enakomerno razdeli med podjetja, ki imajo pravice ali pooblastila, navedene v točki (a) omenjenega pododstavka;
if the market share referred to in Article 4(3) is initially not more than 25 % but subsequently rises above that level without exceeding 30 %, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall continue to apply for a period of two consecutive calendar years following the year in which the 25 % threshold was first exceeded;
če tržni delež, naveden v členu 4(3), na začetku ne presega 25 %, pozneje pa se poveča nad to raven, ne da bi presegel 30 %, izjema, predvidena v členu 2, velja še za obdobje dveh zaporednih koledarskih let po letu, v katerem je bil 25-odstotni prag prvič presežen;
if the market share referred to in Article 4(3) is initially not more than 25 % but subsequently rises above 30 %, the exemption provided for in Article 2 shall continue to apply for a period of one calendar year following the year in which the level of 30 % was first exceeded;
če tržni delež, naveden v členu 4(3), na začetku ne presega 25 %, pozneje pa se poveča nad 30 %, izjema iz člena 2 velja še za eno koledarsko leto po letu, v katerem je bila raven 30 % prvič presežena;
the benefit of points (d) and (e) may not be combined so as to exceed a period of two calendar years.
ugodnosti iz točk (d) in (e) ni mogoče kombinirati tako, da bi se preseglo obdobje dveh koledarskih let.
The prohibition laid down in Article 101(1) of the Treaty shall not apply during the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012 in respect of agreements already in force on 31 December 2010 which do not satisfy the conditions for exemption provided for in this Regulation but which satisfy the conditions for exemption provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2659/2000.
Prepoved iz člena 101(1) Pogodbe ne velja od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2012 v zvezi s sporazumi, ki že veljajo 31. decembra 2010 in ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za uporabo izjeme iz te uredbe, izpolnjujejo pa pogoje za uporabo izjeme iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2659/2000.
It shall expire on 31 December 2022.
Veljati preneha 31. decembra 2022.
OJ L 285, 29.12.1971, p. 46.
UL L 285, 29.12.1971, str. 46.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Article 81 of the EC Treaty has become Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Člen 81 Pogodbe ES je z učinkom od 1. decembra 2009 postal člen 101 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
For the purposes of this Regulation, references to Article 101 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Article 81 of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
Kadar je to primerno, se v tej Uredbi sklicevanja na člen 101 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije razumejo kot sklicevanja na člen 81 Pogodbe ES.
The TFEU also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
PDEU je uvedla tudi nekatere spremembe terminologije, kot sta nadomestitvi „Skupnost“ z „Unija“ in „skupni trg“ z „notranji trg“.
The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this Regulation.
V tej uredbi se bo uporabljala terminologija PDEU.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1218/2010
on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements
o uporabi člena 101(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za nekatere skupine sporazumov o specializaciji in usklajena ravnanja
Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 empowers the Commission to apply Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2] by regulation to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty which have as their object specialisation, including agreements necessary for achieving it.
Uredba (EGS) št. 2821/71 pooblašča Komisijo, da z uredbo določi uporabo člena 101(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije [2] za nekatere skupine sporazumov, sklepov in usklajenih ravnanj, ki spadajo v področje uporabe člena 101(1) Pogodbe, katerih predmet je specializacija, vključno s sporazumi, potrebnimi za dosego specializacije.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2658/2000 of 29 November 2000 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of specialisation agreements [3] defines categories of specialisation agreements which the Commission regarded as normally satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 101(3) of the Treaty.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2658/2000 z dne 29. novembra 2000 o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe pri skupinah sporazumov o specializaciji [3] opredeljuje skupine sporazumov o specializaciji, za katere je Komisija menila, da običajno izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 101(3) Pogodbe.
In view of the overall positive experience with the application of that Regulation, which expires on 31 December 2010, and taking into account further experience acquired since its adoption, it is appropriate to adopt a new block exemption regulation.
Zaradi splošnih pozitivnih izkušenj z uporabo navedene uredbe, ki preneha veljati 31. decembra 2010, in ob upoštevanju dodatnih izkušenj, pridobljenih od sprejetja navedene uredbe, je smiselno sprejeti novo uredbo o skupinskih izjemah.
This Regulation should meet the two requirements of ensuring effective protection of competition and providing adequate legal security for undertakings.
Ta uredba mora izpolnjevati dve zahtevi glede zagotavljanja učinkovitega varstva konkurence in ustrezne pravne varnosti za podjetja.
The pursuit of those objectives should take account of the need to simplify administrative supervision and the legislative framework to as great an extent as possible.
Pri uresničevanju teh ciljev je treba upoštevati potrebo po čim večji poenostavitvi upravnega nadzora in pravnih okvirov.
Below a certain level of market power it can in general be presumed, for the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty, that the positive effects of specialisation agreements will outweigh any negative effects on competition.
Pod določeno stopnjo tržne moči je za uporabo člena 101(3) Pogodbe na splošno mogoče domnevati, da bodo pozitivni učinki sporazumov o specializaciji prevladali nad negativnimi učinki na konkurenco.
The benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to those agreements for which it can be assumed with sufficient certainty that they satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty.
Ugodnost izjeme, ki jo določa ta uredba, bi morala biti omejena na tiste sporazume, za katere se lahko z dovolj gotovosti domneva, da izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 101(3) Pogodbe.
Agreements on specialisation in production are most likely to contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods if the parties have complementary skills, assets or activities, because they can concentrate on the manufacture of certain products and thus operate more efficiently and supply the products more cheaply.
Za sporazume o specializaciji v proizvodnji je najbolj verjetno, da bodo prispevali k izboljšanju proizvodnje ali distribucije blaga, če imajo pogodbene stranke dodatna znanja, sredstva ali dejavnosti, saj se lahko osredotočijo na proizvodnjo nekaterih proizvodov ter zato poslujejo učinkoviteje in dobavljajo proizvode po nižjih cenah.
The same can generally be said about agreements on specialisation in the preparation of services.
Isto na splošno velja tudi za sporazume o specializaciji pri pripravi storitev.
Given effective competition, it is likely that consumers will receive a fair share of the resulting benefits.
Glede na učinkovito konkurenco je verjetno, da bodo imeli potrošniki od tega precejšnje koristi.
Such advantages can arise from agreements whereby one party fully or partly gives up the manufacture of certain products or preparation of certain services in favour of another party (unilateral specialisation), from agreements whereby each party fully or partly gives up the manufacture of certain products or preparation of certain services in favour of another party (reciprocal specialisation) and from agreements whereby the parties undertake to jointly manufacture certain products or prepare certain services (joint production).
Tovrstne prednosti lahko izhajajo iz sporazumov, na podlagi katerih ena pogodbena stranka v celoti ali delno preneha proizvajati nekatere proizvode ali pripravljati nekatere storitve v korist druge pogodbene stranke (enostranska specializacija), sporazumov, na podlagi katerih se vsaka pogodbena stranka v celoti ali delno odpove proizvodnji nekaterih proizvodov ali pripravi nekaterih storitev v korist druge pogodbene stranke (vzajemna specializacija), in sporazumov, s katerimi se pogodbene stranke dogovorijo o skupni proizvodnji nekaterih proizvodov ali pripravi nekaterih storitev (skupna proizvodnja).
In the context of this Regulation, the concepts of unilateral and reciprocal specialisation do not require a party to reduce capacity, as it is sufficient if they reduce their production volumes.
V okviru te uredbe koncepta enostranske in vzajemne specializacije ne pomenita, da mora pogodbena stranka zmanjšati zmogljivost, ampak je dovolj, če zmanjšajo obseg svoje proizvodnje.
The concept of joint production, however, does not require the parties to reduce their individual production activities outside the scope of their envisaged joint production arrangement.
Koncept skupne proizvodnje pa ne pomeni, da morata pogodbeni stranki zmanjšati svoje proizvodne dejavnosti izven področja svojega dogovora o predvideni skupni proizvodnji.
The nature of unilateral and reciprocal specialisation agreements presupposes that the parties are active on the same product market.
Enostranski in vzajemni sporazumi glede na svojo naravo o specializaciji predvidevajo, da so pogodbene stranke dejavne na istem proizvodnem trgu.
It is not necessary for the parties to be active on the same geographic market.
Ni treba, da so pogodbene stranke dejavne na istem geografskem trgu.
Consequently, the application of this Regulation to unilateral and reciprocal specialisation agreements should be limited to scenarios where the parties are active on the same product market.
Zato bi morala biti uporaba te uredbe za enostranske in vzajemne sporazume o specializaciji omejena na razmere, ko so pogodbene stranke dejavne na istem proizvodnem trgu.
Joint production agreements can be entered into by parties who are already active on the same product market but also by parties who wish to enter a product market by way of the agreement.
Sporazume o skupni proizvodnji lahko sklenejo pogodbene stranke, ki so že dejavne na istem proizvodnem trgu, pa tudi pogodbene stranke, ki želijo vstopiti na proizvodni trg s sporazumom.
Therefore, joint production agreements should fall within the scope of this Regulation irrespective of whether the parties are already active in the same product market.
Zato bi morali sporazumi o skupni proizvodnji spadati na področje uporabe te uredbe ne glede na to, ali so pogodbene stranke že dejavne na istih proizvodnih trgih.
To ensure that the benefits of specialisation will materialise without one party leaving the market downstream of production entirely, unilateral and reciprocal specialisation agreements should only be covered by this Regulation where they provide for supply and purchase obligations or joint distribution.
Da bi zagotovili uresničitev prednosti specializacije, ne da bi pri tem ena od pogodbenih strank popolnoma zapustila trg, ki je v proizvodni verigi za proizvodnim, velja ta uredba za enostranske in vzajemne sporazume o specializaciji le, če določajo obveznosti dobave in nabave ali skupno distribucijo.
Supply and purchase obligations may, but do not have to, be of an exclusive nature.
Obveznosti dobave in nabave so lahko izključne narave, vendar to ni nujno.
It can be presumed that, where the parties’ share of the relevant market for the products which are the subject matter of a specialisation agreement does not exceed a certain level, the agreements will, as a general rule, give rise to economic benefits in the form of economies of scale or scope or better production technologies, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefits.
Domneva se lahko, da bodo v primeru, ko delež pogodbenih strank na upoštevnem trgu za proizvode, ki so predmet sporazuma o specializaciji, ne presega določene ravni, taki sporazumi praviloma privedli do gospodarskih prednosti v obliki ekonomije obsega, ekonomije povezanih proizvodov ali boljših proizvodnih tehnologij, pri tem pa potrošnikom zagotavljali pravičen delež doseženih koristi.
However, where the products manufactured under a specialisation agreement are intermediary products which one or more of the parties fully or partly use as an input for their own production of certain downstream products which they subsequently sell on the market, the exemption conferred by this Regulation should also be conditional on the parties’ share on the relevant market for these downstream products not exceeding a certain level.
Vendar v primeru, da so proizvodi, ki so izdelani na podlagi sporazuma o specializaciji, vmesni proizvodi, ki jih ena ali več pogodbenih strank v celoti ali delno sama uporablja za proizvodnjo nekaterih proizvodov v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu, ki jih te pogodbene stranke prodajajo na trgu, mora biti poleg tega tudi izjema, ki jo določa ta uredba, pogojena s tem, da delež pogodbenih strank na upoštevnem trgu za te proizvode za nadaljnji trg, ne presega določene ravni.
In such a case, merely looking at the parties’ market share at the level of the intermediary product would ignore the potential risk of foreclosing or increasing the price of inputs for competitors at the level of the downstream products.
V takem primeru bi z osredotočanjem na tržni delež pogodbenih strank na ravni vmesnih proizvodov prezrli potencialno tveganje zapiranja trga ali povečevanje cen proizvodnih sredstev za konkurente na ravni proizvodov v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu.