natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Section 29 of the Broadcasting Act (1994 version); see also the 4/94 report, paragraph 4: ‘The Minister of Culture decides in agreement with the Finance Committee [of Parliament] what share of the advertisement company’s profit and what share of the license fees should be paid annually into the TV2 Fund. If insufficient funds go into the TV2 Fund, the Fund can — with the Minister’s approval — take out State guaranteed operating loans. The size of the guarantee is determined by the Minister in agreement with the Finance Committee. In line with the framework budgets set by the Minister of Culture, funds are transferred from the TV2 Fund to finance the broadcasting enterprise constituted by a nation-wide television station — TV2/Danmark — and 8 regional stations.’
Oddelek 29 Zakona o oddajanju (različica iz leta 1994); glej tudi odstavek 4 poročila 4/94: „Minister za kulturo v dogovoru s finančnim odborom [parlamenta] določi, kolikšen delež dobička oglaševalskega podjetja in kolikšen delež naročnin bi se moral letno plačati v sklad TV2. Če se v sklad TV2 plačajo nezadostna sredstva, lahko sklad, z odobritvijo ministra, najame posojila za poslovanje z državnim poroštvom. Obseg poroštva določi minister v dogovoru s finančnim odborom. V skladu z okvirnimi proračuni, ki jih je določil minister za kulturo, se sredstva prenesejo iz sklada TV2 za financiranje radiotelevizijskega podjetja, ki ga predstavljajo televizijska postaja s pokritjem celotne države TV2/Danmark in 8 regionalnih postaj.“
Sections 30-33 of the Broadcasting Act (1994 version); see also the 4/94 report, paragraph 4, quoted above.
Oddelki 30–33 Zakona o oddajanju (različica iz leta 1994); glej tudi odstavek 4 poročila 4/94, ki je citiran zgoraj.
Letter from the Danish authorities, 24 March 2003, p. 8.
Dopis danskih organov, 24. marca 2003, str. 8.
Point 57 of the 2001 Broadcasting Communication.
Točka 57 Sporočila o oddajanju iz leta 2001.
Reply from the Danish Government in point 3 of its letter of 26 June 2009.
Odgovor danske vlade v točki 3 njenega dopisa z dne 26. junija 2009.
Point 10 of the Commission Notice on the application of the state aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3).
Točka 10 Sporočila Komisije o uporabi pravil državnih pomoči za ukrepe, ki se nanašajo na neposredno obdavčenje podjetij (UL C 384, 10.12.1998, str. 3).
Point 2.1.2 of the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (2000/C 71/07).
Točka 2.1.2 Sporočila Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki jamstev (2000/C 71/07).
See Aid No NN 70/98, ‘State aid to public broadcasting channels “Kinderkanal and Phoenix” ’ ( OJ C 238, 21.8.1999, p. 3).
Glej Pomoč št. NN 70/98, „Državna pomoč za javno oddajanje televizijskih programov, Kinderkanal in Phoenix“ ( UL C 238, 21.8.1999, str. 3).
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I-7747.
Zadeva C-280/00 Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] Recueil I-7747.
Act No 578 of 24 June 1994, as amended by Act No 666 of 5 July 1996, Act No 75 of 29 January 1997, Act No 138 of 19 February 1998, Act No 208 of 6 April 1999, Act No 551 of 20 June 2000, Act No 203 of 22 March 2001, Act No 701 of 15 July 2001 and Act No 1052 of 17 December 2002.
Zakon št. 578 z dne 24. junija 1994, kakor je bil spremenjen z Zakonom št. 666 z dne 5. julija 1996, Zakonom št. 75 z dne 29. januarja 1997, Zakonom št. 138 z dne 19. februarja 1998, Zakonom št. 208 z dne 6. aprila 1999, Zakonom št. 551 z dne 20. junija 2000, Zakonom št. 203 z dne 22. marca 2001, Zakonom št. 701 z dne 15. julija 2001, Zakonom št. 1052 z dne 17. decembra 2002.
Paragraph 228 of the judgment.
Odstavek 228 sodbe.
Paragraph 229 of the judgment.
Odstavek 229 sodbe.
Case C-261/89 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-4437; Joined Cases C-278/92 to C-280/92 Spain v Commission etc. [1994] ECR I-4103.
Zadeva C-261/89 Italija proti Komisiji [1991] Recueil I-4437; združene zadeve C-278/92 do C-280/92 Španija proti Komisiji itd. [1994] Recueil I-4103.
Case T-16/96 Cityflyer [1998] ECR II-757, paragraph 76.
Zadeva T-16/96 Cityflyer [1998] Recueil II-757, točka 76.
This information is described in detail in recitals 205 ff. of the present decision.
Te informacije so podrobno opisane v uvodni izjavi 205 in naslednjih tega sklepa.
Cases 730/79, Philip Morris Holland v Commission [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11; C-303/88, Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 17; C-156/98, Germany v Commission, [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 33.
Zadeve 730/79, Philip Morris Holland proti Komisiji [1980] Recueil 2671, točka 11; C-303/88, Italija proti Komisiji [1991] Recueil I-1433, točka 17; C-156/98, Nemčija proti Komisiji [2000] Recueil I-6857, točka 33.
See cases 102/87, France v Commission [1988], ECR 4067 and 303/88 Italy v Commission [1989] ECR 801.
Glej zadevi 102/87, Francija proti Komisiji [1988], Recueil 4067 in 303/88 Italija proti Komisiji [1989] Recueil 801.
See Joined Cases T-185/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 and T-300/00, M6 and others v Commission [2002] ECR II-3805.
Glej združene zadeve T-185/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 in T-300/00, M6 in drugi proti Komisiji [2002] Recueil II-3805.
Section 4 of Executive Order 658 of 18 August 1997.
Oddelek 4 Odredbe št. 658 z dne 18. avgusta 1997.
Paragraphs 101-125 of the judgment.
Odstavki 101–125 sodbe.
Paragraph 101 of the judgment.
Odstavek 101 sodbe.
Paragraph 103 of the judgment.
Odstavek 103 sodbe.
With the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty on 1 May 1999, a Protocol on the system of public broadcasting in Member States was annexed to the Treaty.
Z začetkom veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe s 1. majem 1999 je bil protokol o sistemu javnega oddajanja v državah članicah priložen k Pogodbi.
Paragraph 113 of the judgment.
Odstavek 113 sodbe.
Paragraphs 107 and 108 of the judgment.
Odstavka 107 in 108 sodbe.
Paragraph 121 of the judgment.
Odstavek 121 sodbe.
Paragraph 117 of the judgment.
Odstavek 117 sodbe.
Chapter 4, Broadcasting Act (1994 version).
Poglavje 4, Zakon o oddajanju (različica iz leta 1994).
Paragraph 120 of the judgment.
Odstavek 120 sodbe.
Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings (OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 75).
Direktiva Komisije 2000/52/ES z dne 26. julija 2000 o spremembah Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji (UL L 193, 29.7.2000, str. 75).
Broadcasting Communication, point 53.
Sporočilo o oddajanju, točka 53.
In this decision, confidential information that has been omitted is indicated by […].
V tem sklepu so izpuščeni zaupni podatki označeni z […].
The difference in the frequency fee that TV2 paid and the networking fee paid by TVDanmark.
Razlika med pristojbino za frekvenco, ki jo je plačala TV2, in omrežno pristojbino, ki jo je plačala TVDanmark.
Commission Decision of 15 October 2003 on the measures implemented by Italy for RAI SpA (OJ L 119, 23.4.2004, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije z dne 15. oktobra 2003 o ukrepih, ki jih izvaja Italija za RAI SpA (UL L 119, 23.4.2004, str. 1).
Commission decision, E 2/2008, 28 October 2009, Financing of ORF.
Odločba Komisije, E 2/2008, 28. oktobra 2009, Financiranje ORF.
Paragraph 220 of the judgment.
Odstavek 220 sodbe.
Paragraph 221 of the judgment.
Odstavek 221 sodbe.
Paragraph 223 of the judgment.
Odstavek 223 sodbe.
National Audit Office Report 4/94, Section VIII, in particular paragraph 72.
Poročilo generalnega revizorja 4/94, oddelek VIII, zlasti odstavek 72.
Executive order No 658 of 18 August 1997, Chapter 6, Section 32, paragraph 4.
Odredba št. 658 z dne 18. avgusta 1997, poglavje 6, odstavek 4 oddelka 32.
In this table, the solvency ratio is calculated as free capital/total liabilities.
Stopnja solventnosti je v tej preglednici izračunana kot prosti kapital/skupne obveznosti.
Page 58.
Stran 58.
Annual report for 1995, in particular page 14.
Letno poročilo za leto 1995, zlasti stran 14.
Paragraph 219.
Odstavek 219.
Paragraphs 53 to 56.
Odstavki 53 do 56.
Different categories of rating points, spot campaigns etc.
Različne kategorije gledanosti, oglaševalske kampanje itn.
The cost per point expresses the costs of advertising per rating point, i.e. either per GRP or per TRP.
Stroški na točko pomenijo stroške oglaševanja na točko gledanosti, tj. bodisi na GRP ali na TRP.
Case C 60/1999 (ex NN 167-1995) — France, State aid in favour of France 2 and France 3, 10 December 2003.
Zadeva C 60/1999 (ex NN 167-1995) – Francija, Državna pomoč v korist France 2 in France 3, 10. decembra 2003.
Both the Danish authorities and the complainant think that the prices in Denmark can best be compared with other northern countries, as the market conditions are similar (size, viewing behaviour).
Danski organi in pritožnik menijo, da je cene na Danskem najbolje primerjati z drugimi nordijskimi državami, ker tam obstajajo podobni tržni pogoji (velikost, gledanost).
A major reason for the divide is the significantly smaller amount of time people in Nordic countries spent watching TV.
Eden od glavnih razlogov za to delitev je bistveno krajši čas, ki ga ljudje v nordijskih državah namenijo gledanju televizije.
In Denmark average daily viewing per capita was 156 minutes in 2002, whereas the figure for the EU was 192 minutes.
Na Danskem so leta 2002 gledali televizijo dnevno v povprečju 156 minut na osebo, v EU pa 192 minut.
In the EU in 2001, it accounted for the highest proportion in the southern Member States Portugal (60 %), Italy (54 %), and Greece (49 %).
Leta 2001 je bil ta delež v EU najvišji v državah članicah na jugu, in sicer na Portugalskem (60 %), v Italiji (54 %) in Grčiji (49 %).
In the Netherlands (23 %), Finland (24 %), Austria (26 %), and Ireland (26 %) it turned out to be lower than in Denmark.
Na Nizozemskem (23 %), Finskem (24 %), v Avstriji (26 %) in na Irskem (26 %) je bil ta delež manjši kot na Danskem.
In Sweden the percentage matched the figure for Denmark.
Na Švedskem se je ujemal z deležem na Danskem.
TV advertising expenditure as a proportion of GDP was high in southern countries such as Portugal (6,66 ‰), Greece (4,04 ‰), Italy (3,22 ‰), and Spain (3,21 ‰).
Izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje kot delež BDP so bili visoki v južnih državah, kot so Portugalska (6,66 ‰), Grčija (4,04 ‰), Italija (3,22 ‰) in Španija (3,21 ‰).
Per capita TV advertising expenditure in 2001 was lower in Finland (EUR 42) and Sweden (EUR 43) and the same as in the Netherlands (EUR 45).
Izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje na osebo so bili leta 2001 manjši na Finskem (42 EUR) in Švedskem (43 EUR) ter enaki kot na Nizozemskem (45 EUR).
It was highest in the UK (EUR 90), Portugal (EUR 80) and Belgium (EUR 73).
Največji so bili v Združenem kraljestvu (90 EUR), na Portugalskem (80 EUR) in v Belgiji (73 EUR).
CPM (cost per thousand) represents either the cost to generate 1000 gross impressions within the group or the cost to reach 1000 different individuals of the group.
CPM (stroški na tisoč, tj. cena na 1000 gledalcev) so bodisi stroški za bruto gledanost 1000 v skupini ali stroški, potrebni, da se doseže 1000 različnih posameznikov skupine.
The TV contact prices for Norway and Denmark are estimated on the basis of information from local SBS station.
Povezane televizijske cene za Norveško in Dansko se izračunajo na podlagi podatkov lokalne postaje SBS.
The print estimates were provided by a media agency.
Izračune cen za tiskane medije je predložila agencija za medije.
CPM for TV is respectively 13 in Denmark, 14 in Sweden and 18 in Norway.
CPM za televizijo znaša 13 na Danskem, 14 na Švedskem in 18 na Norveškem.
CPM for print is respectively 21 in Denmark, 17 in Sweden and 12 in Norway.
CPM za tiskane medije znaša 21 na Danskem, 17 na Švedskem in 12 na Norveškem.
By letter of 5 June 2002, the Commission requested information from the Danish authorities, who replied by letter of 10 July 2002.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 5. junija 2002 zahtevala informacije od danskih oblasti, ki so odgovorile z dopisom z dne 10. julija 2002.
Two meetings with the Danish authorities were held on 25 October 2002 and on 19 November 2002.
Z danskimi oblastmi sta potekala dva sestanka, in sicer 25. oktobra 2002 in 19. novembra 2002.
TVDanmark submitted comments by letter of 14 April 2003.
TVDanmark je predložila svoje pripombe v dopisu z dne 14. aprila 2003.
The Association of Commercial Television in Europe (ACT) sent comments in a letter dated 14 April 2003.
Združenje komercialnih televizij v Evropi (ACT) je poslalo svoje pripombe v dopisu z dne 14. aprila 2003.
The commercial television stations Antena 3 TV and Gestevisión Telecinco submitted comments on 16 April 2003.
Komercialni televizijski postaji Antena 3 TV in Gestevisión Telecinco sta predložili svoje pripombe dne 16. aprila 2003.
The commercial station TV3 submitted comments in a letter of 14 April 2003.
Komercialna radijska in televizijska postaja TV3 je predložila svoje pripombe v dopisu z dne 14. aprila 2003.
The Commission forwarded these comments to Denmark, which responded by letter of 12 September 2003.
Komisija je posredovala te pripombe Danski, ki se je nanje odzvala z dopisom z dne 12. septembra 2003.
The Commission received further information from the complainant by letters dated 15 December 2003 and 6 January 2004.
Komisija je prejela dodatne informacije od pritožnika v dopisih z dne 15. decembra 2003 in 6. januarja 2004.
A meeting was held between the complainant and the Commission’s services on 17 December 2003 in order to clarify the information submitted in the complainant’s letter of 15 December 2003.
Pritožnik in službe Komisije so se sestali dne 17. decembra 2003, da bi razjasnili informacije, ki jih je pritožnik predložil v dopisu z dne 15. decembra 2003.
The Commission forwarded the information to the Danish Government, which responded by letter dated 15 March 2004.
Komisija je informacije posredovala danski vladi, ki je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 15. marca 2004.
A meeting between the Danish authorities and the Commission’s services took place on 9 February 2004.
Danske oblasti in službe Komisije so se sestale 9. februarja 2004.
After requesting several extensions of the time limit, the Danish authorities sent their observations on 26 June 2009.
Danske oblasti so po več podaljšanjih roka 26. junija 2009 poslale svoje ugotovitve.
As an annex to their letter, the Danish authorities also submitted comments from TV2.
V prilogi k dopisu so danske oblasti predložile tudi pripombe TV2.
The Commission sent additional requests for information, inter alia, on 22 September 2010, 28 October 2010, 19 November 2010, 14 January 2011, to which the Danish authorities replied on 17 November 2010, 30 November 2010, 3 February 2011, 24 February 2011 and 7 March 2011.
Komisija je poslala dodatne zahteve za informacije, med drugim 22. septembra 2010, 28. oktobra 2010, 19. novembra 2010 in 14. januarja 2011, na katere so danske oblasti odzvale 17. novembra 2010, 30. novembra 2010, 3. februarja 2011, 24. februarja 2011 in 7. marca 2011.
The Danish authorities also submitted various items of information in March and April 2011.
Danske oblasti so predložile različne podatke tudi marca in aprila 2011.
The company started national broadcasting on 1 October 1988.
Postaja je začela z nacionalnim oddajanjem 1. oktobra 1988.
It broadcast the terrestrial channel TV2 and also started broadcasting the satellite channel TV2 Zulu in 2000.
Oddajala je zemeljski televizijski program TV2, leta 2000 pa je začela oddajati satelitski televizijski program TV2 Zulu.
has, moreover, been exempted from paying corporation tax under the Company Act.
je bila oproščena tudi plačila davka od dobička pravnih oseb na podlagi Zakona o gospodarskih družbah.
The resulting benefit to TV2 over the period under investigation amounts to DKK 159,4 million.
Posledična ugodnost, ki jo ima TV2 od te oprostitve v preiskovanem obdobju, znaša 159,4 milijona DKK.
The Danish authorities and TV2 also pointed to the Court’s judgment as proof that the conditions of the Altmark judgment of 24 July 2003 [29] were met.
Danske oblasti in TV2 so tudi izpostavile sodbo Sodišča kot dokaz, da so bili izpolnjeni pogoji iz sodbe Altmark z dne 24. julija 2003 [29].
They recalled that, like the BUPA case [30], the TV2 case concerned circumstances already in existence prior to the date of the Altmark judgment.
Opozorili so, da so bile v zadevi TV2, tako kot v zadevi BUPA [30], upoštevane okoliščine, ki so obstajale že pred datumom sodbe Altmark.
In the report, the National Audit Office found that both DR and TV2 improved productivity between 1990 and 1999.
Državni urad za revizijo je v poročilu ugotovil, da sta tako DR kot TV2 med letoma 1990 in 1999 izboljšali produktivnost.
DR reduced its hourly costs for first broadcasts by more than TV2, but in 1999 those costs were still 53 % higher than TV2’s.
DR je svoje urne stroške za prva oddajanja zmanjšala bolj kot TV2, vendar so bili leta 1999 ti stroški še vedno za 53 % višji od stroškov TV2.
Indeed, the question of the definition of the public service remit must not be confused with the question of the financing mechanism chosen to provide that service [64].
Vprašanja opredelitve nalog javne službe dejansko ne gre zamenjati z vprašanjem mehanizma financiranja, izbranega za zagotavljanje te storitve [64].
The Commission regrets that the Danish authorities have not provided clear and unambiguous figures for the amount of advertising revenue in 1995 and 1996.
Komisija obžaluje, da danske oblasti niso zagotovile jasnih in nedvoumnih zneskov prihodka iz oglaševanja za leti 1995 in 1996.
However, in this specific case it considers that there is no need to investigate the issue further as it does not pose a major problem since the Commission, as already stated, considers that the advertising revenue for the years 1995-1996 constitutes State resources which must in any event be deducted from the gross public service cost.
Vendar v tem posebnem primeru meni, da tega vprašanja ni potrebno nadalje raziskovati, saj ne predstavlja večje težave, ker Komisija, kot je bilo že navedeno, meni, da prihodek iz oglaševanja za leti 1995 in 1996 predstavlja državna sredstva, ki jih je treba v vsakem primeru odšteti od bruto stroškov dejavnosti javnih storitev.
The requirement for a capital base was included in TV2’s Statutes in 1997.
Zahteva za kapitalsko osnovo je bila vključena v statutih TV2 leta 1997.
Since then, TV2’s statutes have clearly specified that, from 2001 onwards, TV2’s free capital must amount to at least DKK 200 million and that it should be used to offset the broadcaster’s operating loss [80].
Od takrat je bilo v statutih TV2 jasno določeno, da mora od leta 2001 naprej prosti kapital TV2 znašati vsaj 200 milijonov DKK in da se mora porabiti za izravnavo poslovne izgube postaje [80].
The executive order of 18 August 1997 stipulated that to finance any possible operating loss, the free capital — i.e. capital minus reserves and other tied resources — for nationwide activities should amount to at least DKK 200 million by the end of 2000.
V odredbi z dne 18. avgusta 1997 je določeno, da mora do konca leta 2000 za namene financiranja kakršne koli možne poslovne izgube prosti kapital, tj. kapital, od katerega so odštete rezerve in druga vezana sredstva, za nacionalne dejavnosti znašati vsaj 200 milijonov DKK.
The free capital was to be built up so that it would total at least DKK 50 million by the end of 1998 and at least DKK 100 million by the end of 1999.
Prosti kapital naj bi se povečeval zato, da bi do konca leta 1998 skupno znašal vsaj 50 milijonov DKK, do konca leta 1999 pa vsaj 100 milijonov DKK.
If capital was expected to fall below these figures, the matter was to be put before the Minister of Culture.
Če bi se pričakoval padec kapitala pod te zneske, bi bilo treba zadevo predložiti ministru za kulturo.
In special cases the Minister of Culture can, after consulting the National Audit Office, approve a lower amount of capital, to which he may attach specific conditions.
Minister za kulturo lahko v posebnih primerih, po posvetovanju z generalnim revizorjem, odobri nižji znesek kapitala, v zvezi s katerim lahko določi posebne pogoje.
Indeed, according to TV2’s annual accounts for 1997 [82], the Media Committee had decided that TV2 should digitise its production equipment before the end of 2000.
Glede na letne računovodske izkaze TV2 za leto 1997 [82] je odbor za medije odločil, da naj TV2 digitalizira svojo produkcijsko opremo pred koncem leta 2000.
DKK 300 million was earmarked for the digitisation of both TV2 and the regional stations.
Za digitalizacijo TV2 in regionalnih postaj je bilo rezerviranih 300 milijonov DKK.
In order to demonstrate that the level of capital in TV2 was justified, the Danish authorities submitted an opinion prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers dated 18 November 2002.
Da bi dokazale, da je bila raven kapitala v TV2 upravičena, so danske oblasti predložile mnenje z dne 18. novembra 2002, ki ga je pripravilo podjetje PricewaterhouseCoopers.
That opinion stated that TV2’s solvency ratio at the end of the period of investigation was lower than that of other Scandinavian broadcasters comparable to TV2 in terms of size, activities, structure and the markets in which they operated.
V tem mnenju je bilo navedeno, da je bila stopnja solventnosti TV2 ob koncu preiskovanega obdobja nižja od stopnje drugih skandinavskih postaj, primerljivih s TV2 glede na velikost, dejavnosti, strukturo in trge, na katerih so delovale.
TV2’s conversion into a limited company took place with retroactive effect from 1 January 2003.
Preoblikovanje TV2 v delniško družbo se je izvedlo z retroaktivnim učinkom od 1. januarja 2003.
In the wake of TV2’s change of legal status and its conversion into a company, a number of measures in favour of TV2 were abolished, such as the interest- and repayment-free loans and the tax exemption.
Po spremembi pravnega statusa TV2 in preoblikovanju postaje v podjetje so bili odpravljeni številni ukrepi v korist TV2, kot so brezobrestna in nepovratna posojila ter oprostitev od plačevanja davka.
This has only been done since 2001.
To se je izvajalo šele od leta 2001.
The Commission therefore recognises that there may have been a distortion on the broadcasting market in that TV2 did not have to take the corporate tax rate into account in setting its commercial prices.
Zato Komisija priznava, da je morda obstajalo izkrivljanje na trgu radijskega in televizijskega oddajanja v tem, da TV2 pri določanju svojih komercialnih cen ni bilo treba upoštevati davka od dobička pravnih oseb.
This decision was quashed by the Competition Appeals Tribunal on 1 November 2006 but then upheld on appeal to the Eastern High Court on 22 June 2009.
To odločbo je razveljavilo pritožbeno sodišče za konkurenco 1. novembra 2006, vendar je bila nato potrjena v pritožbi na Vzhodno sodišče višje stopnje 22. junija 2009.
That ruling was appealed to the Supreme Court, which confirmed the High Court’s ruling on 18 March 2011.
Sklep sodišča je bil predložen vrhovnemu sodišču, ki je 18. marca 2011 potrdilo sklep sodišča višje stopnje.
This followed a decision by the Competition Council on 29 November 2000 in which it had found that TV2’s rebates for the year 2000 constituted abuse of a dominant position.
To je sledilo sklepu Sveta za konkurenčnost z dne 29. novembra 2000, v katerem je ta ugotovil, da so popusti TV2 za leto 2000 predstavljali zlorabo prevladujočega položaja.
In this connection, the Commission notes that the Danish competition authorities’ investigation covered the years 2000-2005, in other words only the last years of the period covered by the present decision.
Komisija v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da je preiskava, ki so jo izvedli danski organi za konkurenco, obsegala obdobje 2000–2005, tj. samo zadnja leta obdobja, ki ga krije ta sklep.
In addition, there are a number of other discounts (for new advertisers, less attractive advertising slots, additional volume rebates etc.).
Poleg tega obstaja še vrsta drugih popustov (za nove oglaševalce, za manj privlačen oglaševalski prostor, dodatni količinski popusti itn.).