natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The regulations establishing the ESA require that the cases where the mechanism to settle disagreements between national competent authorities may be applied are to be specified in the sectoral legislation.
Uredbe o ustanovitvi ESA določajo, da morajo biti primeri, pri katerih se lahko uporabi mehanizem za reševanje sporov med nacionalnimi pristojnimi organi, opredeljeni v sektorski zakonodaji.
This Directive should identify a first set of such cases and should be without prejudice to adding further cases in the future.
Ta direktiva bi morala opredeliti prvi niz takih primerov in ne bi smela posegati v vključitev drugih primerov v prihodnje.
This Directive should not prevent the ESA from acting in accordance with other powers or fulfilling tasks specified in their establishing regulations, including non-binding mediation and contributing to the consistent, efficient and effective application of legal acts of the Union.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela ESA onemogočati, da delujejo v skladu z drugimi pooblastili oziroma da izpolnjujejo naloge, določene v uredbah o njihovi ustanovitvi, vključno z nezavezujočim posredovanjem in zagotavljanjem dosledne, učinkovite in uspešne uporabe pravnih aktov Unije.
Moreover, in those areas where some form of non-binding mediation is already established in the relevant legal act, or where there are time limits for joint decisions to be taken by one or more national competent authorities, amendments are needed to ensure clarity and minimum disruption of the process for reaching a joint decision, but also that where necessary, the ESA should be able to resolve disagreements.
Poleg tega so na tistih področjih, na katerih je neka oblika nezavezujočega posredovanja že vzpostavljena v zadevnih pravnih aktih ali na katerih so določeni roki za sprejemanje skupnih odločitev enega ali več nacionalnih pristojnih organov, potrebne spremembe za zagotovitev jasnosti in čim manjšega oviranja postopka sprejemanja skupne odločitve ter za zagotovitev možnosti, da bi lahko po potrebi spore reševali ESA.
The binding procedure for the settlement of disagreements is designed to solve situations where national competent authorities cannot resolve, among themselves, procedural or substantive issues relating to compliance with legal acts of the Union.
Zavezujoči postopek za reševanje sporov je zasnovan za reševanje primerov, ko nacionalni pristojni organi med seboj ne morejo rešiti postopkovnih ali vsebinskih vprašanj, povezanih s skladnostjo s pravnimi akti Unije.
This Directive should therefore identify situations in which a procedural or a substantive issue of compliance with Union law needs to be resolved and the national competent authorities are not able to resolve the matter on their own.
Ta direktiva bi morala zaradi tega opredeliti primere, v katerih je treba rešiti postopkovna ali vsebinska vprašanja skladnosti s pravom Unije in nacionalni pristojni organi sami ne morejo rešiti zadeve.
In such a situation, one of the national competent authorities concerned should be able to raise the issue with the European Supervisory Authority concerned.
V takšnem primeru bi moral imeti eden od zadevnih nacionalnih pristojnih organov možnost predložiti vprašanje zadevnemu Evropskemu nadzornemu organu.
That European Supervisory Authority should act in accordance with its establishing regulation and with this Directive.
Ta Evropski nadzorni organ bi moral ukrepati v skladu s svojo ustanovitveno uredbo in to direktivo.
The European Supervisory Authority concerned should be able to require the competent authorities concerned to take specific action or to refrain from action in order to settle the matter and to ensure compliance with Union law, with binding effects on the competent authorities concerned.
Zadevni Evropski nadzorni organ bi moral imeti možnost, da od zadevnih pristojnih organov zahteva, naj izvedejo ali opustijo neko dejanje z namenom ureditve zadeve in zagotovitve skladnosti s pravom Unije, z zavezujočimi učinki za zadevne pristojne organe.
In cases where the relevant legal act of the Union confers discretion on Member States, decisions taken by a European Supervisory Authority should not replace the exercise of discretion by the competent authorities in compliance with Union law.
V primerih, ko ustrezni pravni akti Unije podeljujejo diskrecijo državam članicam, odločitve, ki jih sprejme Evropski nadzorni organ, ne bi smele nadomestiti izvajanja diskrecije pristojnih organov v skladu s pravom Unije.
Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions [7] provides for mediation or joint decisions as regards the determination of significant branches for the purposes of supervisory college membership, model validation and group risk assessment.
Direktiva 2006/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij [7] določa posredovanje in skupne odločitve glede določitve pomembnih podružnic za namene članstva v nadzornem kolegiju, ovrednotenja modela in skupinske ocene tveganja.
In all of those areas, amendments should clearly state that in the event of disagreement during a specified time period, the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) may resolve the disagreement using the process outlined in Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010.
Spremembe na vseh navedenih področjih bi morale jasno določati, da lahko v primeru spora v navedenem časovnem obdobju Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ) reši spor z uporabo postopka iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010.
That approach makes it clear that, while the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) should not replace the exercise of discretion by the competent authorities in compliance with Union law, it should be possible for disagreements to be resolved and cooperation to be strengthened before a final decision is taken or issued to an institution.
Na podlagi tega pristopa je jasno, da kljub temu, da Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ) ne bi smel nadomestiti izvajanja diskrecije pristojnih organov v skladu s pravom Unije, bi moralo biti mogoče rešiti spore in okrepiti sodelovanje pred sprejetjem končne odločitve ali pred predložitvijo instituciji.
In order to ensure a smooth transition of the current tasks of the Committee of European Banking Supervisors, the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors and the Committee of European Securities Regulators to the new ESA, references to those Committees should be replaced in the relevant legislation with references to the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), respectively.
Za zagotovitev nemotenega prenosa sedanjih nalog Odbora evropskih bančnih nadzornikov, Odbora evropskih nadzornikov za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine in Odbora evropskih zakonodajalcev za vrednostne papirje na nove ESA bi bilo treba sklicevanja na navedene odbore v zadevni zakonodaji ustrezno nadomestiti s sklicevanji na Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ), Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine) oziroma Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge).
In order to give full effect to the new framework provided for in the TFEU, it is necessary to adapt and replace the implementing powers designed under Article 202 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty) with the appropriate provisions in accordance with Articles 290 and 291 TFEU.
Za popolno uveljavitev novega okvira, ki ga predvideva PDEU, je treba prilagoditi in nadomestiti izvedbena pooblastila, določena v členu 202 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (Pogodbe ES), z ustreznimi določbami v skladu s členoma 290 in 291 PDEU.
That review should be finalised within 3 years from the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and the remaining powers conferred under Article 202 EC Treaty should cease to apply on that date.
Ta pregled bi bilo treba dokončati v treh letih po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, preostala pooblastila, ki so bila podeljena na podlagi člena 202 Pogodbe ES, pa bi se morala na navedeni dan prenehati uporabljati.
The alignment of committee procedures to the TFEU and, in particular, to Articles 290 and 291 thereof, should be effected on a case-by-case basis.
Prilagoditev postopkov v odboru PDEU in zlasti členoma 290 in 291 PDEU bi bilo treba izvesti za vsak posamezen primer.
In order to take account of the technical developments in the financial markets and to specify the requirements laid down in the directives amended by this Directive, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU.
Da bi se upošteval tehnični razvoj na finančnih trgih in podrobno določile zahteve iz direktiv, ki jih spreminja ta direktiva, bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU.
The European Parliament and the Council should have 3 months from the date of notification to object to a delegated act.
Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala imeti na voljo tri mesece od datuma obvestila za nasprotovanje delegiranemu aktu.
At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council, it should be possible to prolong that period by 3 months in regard to significant areas of concern.
Na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta bi moralo biti mogoče to obdobje podaljšati za tri mesece na pomembnih področjih.
It should also be possible for the European Parliament and the Council to inform the other institutions of their intention not to raise objections.
Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu bi moralo biti omogočeno, da obvestita druge institucije, da ne nameravata nasprotovati.
Such early approval of delegated acts is particularly appropriate when deadlines need to be met, for example where there are timetables in the basic act for the Commission to adopt delegated acts.
Taka zgodnja odobritev delegiranih aktov je še posebej primerna, ko je treba spoštovati roke, če na primer obstajajo časovni razporedi, določeni v temeljnem aktu za Komisijo, da sprejme delegirane akte.
In the Declaration (No 39) on Article 290 TFEU, annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, the Conference took note of the Commission's intention to continue to consult experts appointed by the Member States in the preparation of draft delegated acts in the financial services area, in accordance with its established practice.
V izjavi (št. 39) o členu 290 PDEU, ki je priložena Sklepni listini medvladne konference, ki je sprejela Lizbonsko pogodbo, se je konferenca seznanila, da namerava Komisija v skladu s svojo ustaljeno prakso nadaljevati posvetovanja s strokovnjaki, ki jih imenujejo države članice, pri pripravi osnutkov delegiranih aktov na področju finančnih storitev.
The new supervisory architecture established by the ESFS will require national competent authorities to cooperate closely with the ESA.
Nacionalni pristojni organi bodo morali v skladu z novo strukturo nadzora, ki jo določa ESFS, tesneje sodelovati z ESA.
Amendments to the relevant legislation should ensure there are no legal obstacles to the information sharing obligations included in the regulations establishing the ESA.
Spremembe zadevne zakonodaje bi morale zagotoviti, da ne obstajajo pravne ovire pri izpolnjevanju zahtev glede izmenjave informacij, ki so vključene v uredbe o ustanovitvi ESA.
Information transmitted to or exchanged between competent authorities and the ESA or the ESRB should be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, to which the persons employed or formerly employed by the competent authorities receiving the information are subject.
Za informacije, poslane ali izmenjane med pristojnimi organi in ESA ali ESRB, bi morala veljati obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti, ki velja za bivše in sedanje zaposlene v pristojnem organu, ki prejme informacijo.
The regulations establishing the ESA provide that they may develop contacts with supervisory authorities from third countries and assist in preparing equivalence decisions pertaining to supervisory regimes in third countries.
Uredbe o ustanovitvi ESA določajo, da lahko ESA razvijajo stike z nadzornimi organi iz tretjih držav in pomagajo pri pripravi odločitev o enakovrednosti v zvezi z nadzornimi režimi v tretjih državah.
Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments [8] and Directive 2006/48/EC should be amended to allow the ESA to establish cooperation agreements with third countries and exchange information where those third countries can provide guarantees that professional secrecy will be protected.
Direktivo 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov [8] in Direktivo 2006/48/ES bi bilo treba spremeniti, da bosta omogočili ESA, da sklepajo sporazume o sodelovanju s tretjimi državami in izmenjujejo informacije, kadar lahko zadevne tretje države zagotovijo, da bo poslovna skrivnost varovana.
Having a single consolidated list or register for each category of financial institution in the Union, which is currently the duty of each national competent authority, will improve transparency and is more appropriate in the context of the single financial market.
Obstoj enega samega združenega seznama ali registra za posamezno kategorijo finančnih institucij v Uniji, ki je trenutno zadolžitev posameznega nacionalnega pristojnega organa, se bo izboljšala preglednost in je primernejši v okviru enotnega finančnega trga.
The ESA should be given the task of establishing, publishing and regularly updating registers and lists of financial actors within the Union.
ESA bi morali biti zadolženi za vzpostavitev, objavo in redno posodabljanje registrov in seznamov finančnih udeležencev v Uniji.
This concerns the list of authorisations of credit institutions granted by national competent authorities, the register of all investment firms and the list of regulated markets under Directive 2004/39/EC.
To se nanaša na seznam dovoljenj kreditnih institucij, ki so jih izdali nacionalni pristojni organi, register vseh investicijskih družb ter seznam reguliranih trgov v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES.
Similarly, the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) should be given the task of establishing, publishing and regularly updating the list of approved prospectuses and the certificates of approval under Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading [9].
Podobno bi moral biti Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge) zadolžen za vzpostavitev, objavo in redno posodabljanje seznama odobrenih prospektov in potrdil o odobritvi v skladu z Direktivo 2003/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. novembra 2003 o prospektu, ki se objavi ob javni ponudbi ali sprejemu vrednostnih papirjev v trgovanje [9].
In those areas where the ESA are under an obligation to develop draft technical standards, those draft technical standards should be submitted to the Commission within 3 years of the creation of the ESA unless another deadline is established by the relevant legislative act.
Na tistih področjih, na katerih morajo ESA pripraviti osnutke tehničnih standardov, bi bilo treba te osnutke tehničnih standardov predložiti Komisiji v treh letih od ustanovitve ESA, razen če ni v ustreznem zakonodajnem aktu določen drugačen rok.
The tasks of the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) in relation to Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems [10] should be without prejudice to the competence of the European System of Central Banks to promote the smooth operation of payment systems, in line with the fourth indent of Article 127(2) TFEU.
Naloge Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropskega organa za vrednostne papirje in trge) v zvezi z Direktivo 98/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 1998 o dokončnosti poravnave pri plačilih in sistemih poravnave vrednostnih papirjev [10] ne bi smele posegati v pristojnosti Evropskega sistema centralnih bank, s čimer bi se podpiralo nemoteno delovanje plačilnih sistemov, v skladu s četrto alineo člena 127 (2) PDEU.
The technical standards to be drafted by the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) in accordance with this Directive and in relation to Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision [11] should be without prejudice to the competences of Member States with regard to prudential requirements on such institutions as provided for in Directive 2003/41/EC.
Tehnični standardi, ki jih mora oblikovati Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine) v skladu s to direktivo in v povezavi z Direktivo 2003/41/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. junija 2003 o dejavnostih in nadzoru institucij za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje [11] ne bi smeli posegati v pristojnosti držav članic v zvezi z bonitetnimi zahtevami do takšnih institucij, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2003/41/ES.
Under Article 13(5) of Directive 2003/71/EC, the competent authority of the home Member State may transfer the approval of a prospectus to the competent authority of another Member State, subject to the agreement of that competent authority.
V skladu s členom 13(5) Direktive 2003/71/ES, lahko pristojni organ matične države članice prenese odobritev prospekta na pristojni organ druge države članice, če ta pristojni organ s tem soglaša.
Article 28(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 requires that such delegation agreements be notified to the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) at least 1 month before they are put into effect.
Člen 28(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 zahteva, da je Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge) o takih sporazumih o prenosu obveščen vsaj en mesec pred začetkom njihove veljavnosti.
However, given the experience in transfer of approval under Directive 2003/71/EC, which provides for shorter deadlines, it is appropriate not to apply Article 28(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 to that situation.
Vendar je glede na izkušnje pri prenosu odobritve v skladu z Direktivo 2003/71/ES, ki določa krajše roke, ustrezno, da se člen 28(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 v tem primeru ne uporabi.
There is currently no need for the ESA to develop draft technical standards on the existing requirements that the persons who effectively direct the business of investment firms, credit institutions, UCITS and their management companies be of sufficiently good repute and sufficiently experienced so as to ensure their sound and prudent management.
Trenutno ni potrebe po tem, da bi ESA pripravili osnutke tehničnih standardov o sedanjih zahtevah, da morajo imeti osebe, ki dejansko vodijo posle investicijskih družb, kreditnih institucij, KNPVP in njihovih družb za upravljanje, dovolj dober ugled in dovolj izkušenj, da lahko zagotovijo dobro in skrbno vodenje.
However, given the importance of those requirements, the ESA should give priority to identifying best practices in guidelines and to ensuring the convergence of supervisory and prudential processes towards those best practices.
Vendar bi morali ESA zaradi pomembnosti navedenih zahtev kot prednostno nalogo določiti najboljše prakse v smernicah ter zagotoviti zbliževanje nadzornih in bonitetnih postopkov v smeri teh najboljših praks.
They should similarly identify best practices and ensure convergence with respect to prudential requirements relative to the head office of those bodies.
Enako bi morali določiti najboljše prakse in zagotoviti zbliževanje glede bonitetnih zahtev v zvezi s sedežem navedenih organov.
The European single rule book, applicable to all financial institutions in the internal market, should ensure adequate harmonisation of criteria and methodology to be applicable by the competent authorities to assess the risk of credit institutions.
Enotna evropska pravila, ki se uporabljajo za vse finančne institucije na notranjem trgu, bi morala zagotoviti ustrezno uskladitev meril in metodologije, ki naj jih uporabljajo pristojni organi za ocenjevanje tveganja kreditnih institucij.
More particularly, the purpose of developing draft technical standards in relation to the Internal Ratings Based approach, the Advanced Measurement Approach and the internal model for market risk approach, as provided for by this Directive, should be to ensure the quality and robustness of such approaches, as well as the consistency of their review by the competent authorities.
Natančneje, namen priprave osnutkov tehničnih standardov v zvezi s pristopom na osnovi notranjih bonitetnih ocen, naprednim pristopom za merjenje in notranjim modelom za pristop tržnega tveganja, kakor je določeno v tej direktivi, bi moral zagotoviti kakovost in trdnost takih pristopov ter da jih pristojni organi dosledno pregledujejo.
Those technical standards should allow the competent authorities to permit financial institutions to develop different approaches based on their experience and specificities, in accordance with the requirements laid down in Directive 2006/48/EC and Directive 2006/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions [12] and subject to the requirements of the relevant technical standards.
Ti tehnični standardi bi morali pristojnim organom omogočati, da finančnim institucijam dovolijo oblikovanje različnih pristopov na podlagi njihovih izkušenj in posebnosti, v skladu z zahtevami, določenimi v Direktivi 2006/48/ES in Direktivi 2006/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o kapitalski ustreznosti investicijskih podjetij in kreditnih institucij [12] in na podlagi zahtev iz zadevnih tehničnih standardov.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely improving the functioning of the internal market by means of ensuring a high, effective and consistent level of prudential regulation and supervision, protecting depositors, investors and beneficiaries and thereby businesses and consumers, protecting the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, maintaining the stability and sustainability of the financial system, preserving the real economy, safeguarding public finances and strengthening international supervisory coordination, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can, therefore, by reason of their scale, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer izboljšanje delovanja notranjega trga z zagotavljanjem visoke, učinkovite in usklajene stopnje ureditve varnega in skrbnega poslovanja ter nadzora nad njim, zaščite vlagateljev, investitorjev in upravičencev ter s tem podjetij in potrošnikov, zaščite integritete, učinkovitosti in pravilnega delovanja finančnih trgov, ohranjanja stabilnosti in trajnosti finančnega sistema, ohranjanja realnega gospodarstva, varovanja javnih financ in krepitve mednarodnega usklajevanja nadzora, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se te cilje zaradi njihovega obsega lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.