natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the PRC which are subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by that Regulation (the second criterion), and
ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v LRK, za katerega veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z navedeno uredbo (drugi pogoj), ter
it has actually exported to the Union the products concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Union (the third criterion),
je dejansko izvažal zadevne izdelke v Unijo po obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi, ali je sklenil nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost o izvozu velike količine v Unijo (tretji pogoj),
then Article 1 of that Regulation can be amended by granting the new exporting producer the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample, i.e. 8,4 %.
potem se člen 1 navedene uredbe lahko spremeni tako, da se novemu proizvajalcu izvozniku odobri stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, in sicer 8,4 %.
The list of companies granted the weighted average duty rate of 8,4 % for cooperating companies and contained in Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 was amended by Council Regulations (EC) No 249/2008 [3] and (EC) No 189/2009 [4] and by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 474/2011 [5].
Seznam družb, ki jim je bila odobrena tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 8,4 % za sodelujoče družbe in ki je naveden v Uredbi (ES) št. 1425/2006, je bil spremenjen z uredbama Sveta (ES) št. 249/2008 [3] in (ES) št. 189/2009 [4] ter Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 474/2011 [5].
NEW EXPORTING PRODUCER REQUESTS
ZAHTEVKI ZA OBRAVNAVO NOVEGA PROIZVAJALCA IZVOZNIKA
Six Chinese companies have applied to be granted the same treatment as the companies cooperating in the original investigation not included in the sample (‘new exporting producer treatment’).
Šest kitajskih družb je vložilo zahtevek za odobritev iste obravnave, kot je bila odobrena družbam, ki so sodelovale v prvotni preiskavi in niso bile vključene v vzorec (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnava novega proizvajalca izvoznika).
An examination has been carried out to determine whether the six applicants fulfil the criteria for being granted new exporting producer treatment as set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006.
S preiskavo se je preverilo, ali navedenih šest vložnikov izpolnjuje pogoje za odobritev obravnave novega proizvajalca izvoznika iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1425/2006.
An application form was sent to all six applicants who were asked to supply evidence to demonstrate that they met the three criteria mentioned above.
Vsem šestim vložnikom je bil poslan vprašalnik, obenem pa so bili pozvani k predložitvi dokazov o izpolnjevanju treh navedenih pogojev.
One company requesting new exporting producer treatment did not provide the requested information.
Ena družba, ki je vložila zahtevek za obravnavo novega proizvajalca izvoznika, ni predložila zahtevanih informacij.
It was therefore not possible to verify whether it fulfilled the criteria set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 and its request had to be rejected.
Zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1425/2006, in njen zahtevek je bilo treba zavrniti.
One company withdrew its application.
Ena družba je zahtevek umaknila.
One company neither exported the product concerned to the Union nor entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Union after the investigation period.
Ena družba ni niti izvažala zadevnega izdelka v Unijo niti ni sklenila nepreklicne pogodbene obveznosti o izvozu velike količine v Unijo po obdobju preiskave.
Thus, it did not meet the third criterion and its request was therefore rejected.
Tako ni izpolnjevala tretjega pogoja, zato je bil njen zahtevek zavrnjen.
One company was not considered as a new exporting producer since it is related to an exporting producer in the PRC which is subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006.
Ena družba se ni štela za novega proizvajalca izvoznika, ker je povezana s proizvajalcem izvoznikom iz LRK, za katerega veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1425/2006.
It thus did not meet the second criterion and its request was therefore rejected.
Tako ni izpolnila drugega pogoja, zato je bil njen zahtevek zavrnjen.
One company submitted misleading information concerning its date of establishment.
Ena družba je predložila zavajajoče informacije o datumu ustanovitve.
This cast doubts on the reliability of the information provided, including the period of time the product concerned could have been exported to the EU.
To vzbuja dvome o zanesljivosti predloženih informacij, vključno z obdobjem, v katerem bi se zadevni izdelek lahko izvažal v EU.
Its request was therefore rejected.
Zahtevek te družbe je bil zato zavrnjen.
The evidence provided by the remaining Chinese exporting producer was considered sufficient to show that it fulfils the criteria set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006.
Dokazi o izpolnjevanju pogojev iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1425/2006, ki jih je predložil preostali kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, so se šteli za zadostne.
This exporting producer can therefore be granted the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 8,4 %) and consequently its name can be added to the list of exporting producers in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006.
Temu proizvajalcu izvozniku se torej lahko odobri stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec (tj. 8,4 %), njegovo ime pa se tako lahko doda na seznam proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1425/2006.
The applicants and the Union industry have been informed of the findings of the examination and were given the opportunity to submit their comments.
Vložniki in industrija Unije so bili obveščeni o ugotovitvah preiskave in so imeli možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
All arguments and submissions made by interested parties were analysed and duly taken into account where warranted,
Vsi argumenti in stališča zainteresiranih strani so bili analizirani in upoštevani, če so bili utemeljeni –
The following company shall be added to the list of producers from the People’s Republic of China listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006:
Na seznam proizvajalcev iz Ljudske republike Kitajske iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1425/2006 se doda naslednja družba:
OJ L 76, 19.3.2008, p. 8.
UL L 76, 19.3.2008, str. 8.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 476/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 476/2011
amending Council Regulation (EU) No 57/2011 as regards catch limits for the fisheries on sandeel in EU waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 57/2011 glede omejitve ulova za pravo peščenko v vodah EU con ICES IIa, IIIa in IV
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 57/2011 of 18 January 2011 fixing for 2011 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in EU waters and, for EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters [1], and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 57/2011 z dne 18. januarja 2011 o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za leto 2011 za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki se uporabljajo v vodah EU, in za plovila EU v nekaterih vodah zunaj EU [1], in zlasti člena 5(4) Uredbe,
Catch limits for sandeel in EU waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV are laid down in Annex IA of Regulation (EU) 57/2011.
Omejitve ulova za pravo peščenko v vodah EU con ICES IIa, IIIa in IV so določene v Prilogi IA k Uredbi (EU) 57/2011.
Pursuant to point 4 of Annex IID to Regulation (EU) No 57/2011, the Commission is to revise the total allowable catches (TAC) and quotas for 2011 for sandeel in those zones based on advice from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF).
V skladu s točko 4 Priloge IID k Uredbi (EU) št. 57/2011 mora Komisija revidirati celotni dovoljeni ulov (TAC) in kvote za leto 2011 za pravo peščenko v navedenih conah na podlagi mnenja Mednarodnega sveta za raziskovanje morja (ICES) ter Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo (STECF).
ICES delivered its advice on 21 February 2011 for each of the seven management areas defined in Annex IID of Regulation 57/2011.
ICES je 21. februarja 2011 podal svoje mnenje za vsako od sedmih območij upravljanja iz Priloge IID Uredbe 57/2011.
The STECF also considered it appropriate to establish catch limits of 10000 tonnes and 420 tonnes respectively in management areas 4 and 6
STECF je obenem štel za primerno, da se za območji upravljanja 4 in 6 določita omejitvi ulova 10000 ton oziroma 420 ton.
The STECF considered that the catch limits for management areas 3 and 7 should be zero.
Po mnenju STECF morata biti omejitvi ulova za območji upravljanja 3 in 7 enaki nič.
However in supplementary advice delivered on 17 March 2011, the STECF considered that a catch limit of 10000 tonnes could be allowed in management area 3 in order to conduct a monitoring fishery in that area.
Vendar je STECF v dopolnilnem mnenju z dne 17. marca 2011 pripomnil, da je v območju upravljanja 3 možno dovoliti omejitev ulova 10000 ton, da se na tem območju lahko izvaja spremljanje ribištva.
Annex IA to Regulation (EU) No 57/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo IA k Uredbi (EE) št. 57/2011 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex IA to Regulation (EU) No 57/2011 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga IA k Uredbi (EU) št. 57/2011 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Annex IA to Regulation (EU) No 57/2011 is amended as follows:
Priloga IA k Uredbi (EU) št. 57/2011 se spremeni:
The entry concerning the species sandeel in EU waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV is replaced by the following:
Vpis za prave peščenke v vodah EU con ICES IIa, IIIa ter IV se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Within the limits of the abovementioned quotas, no more than the quantities given below may be taken in the following sandeel management areas, as defined in Annex IID:
V mejah navedenih kvot se v naslednjih območjih upravljanja prave peščenke, kot so določena v Prilogi IID, ne sme uloviti več od naslednjih količin:
Zone EU waters of sandeel management areas
Cona Vode EU v območjih upravljanja prave peščenke
allocated
0Nerazporejeno
Sandeel and associated by-catches
Prava peščenka in povezan prilov
Zone EU waters of IIa, IIIa and IV [1](SAN/2A3A4.)
Cona Vode EU con IIa, IIIa in IV [1](SAN/2A3A4.)
Provisional quota in accordance with Article 1(2) of this Regulation.
Začasna kvota v skladu s členom 1(2) te uredbe.
Unallocated quota in accordance with Article 1(3) of this Regulation
Nerazporejena kvota v skladu s členom 1(3) te uredbe.
At least 98 % of landed quantities counted against the TAC must be of sandeel.
Prava peščenka mora predstavljati vsaj 98 % iztovorjene količine, ki se všteje v TAC.
By-catches of dab, mackerel and whiting to be counted against the remaining 2 % of the TAC.
Prilov limande, šura in mola se všteje v ostala 2 % TAC.
The ICES advice was reviewed by the STECF, which delivered its conclusions to the Commission on 24 February 2011.
STECF je pregledal mnenje ICES in 24. februarja 2011 podal svoje zaključke Komisiji.
In accordance with that advice, the catch limit for management area 1 should be increased to 320000 tonnes and the catch limit for management area 2 decreased to 34000 tonnes.
V skladu s tem mnenjem je treba omejitev ulova za območje upravljanja 1 povečati na 320000 ton, omejitev ulova za območje upravljanja 2 pa povečati na 34000 ton.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 477/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 477/2011
initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People’s Republic of China by imports of certain molybdenum wires consigned from Malaysia and Switzerland, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and Switzerland or not, and making such imports subject to registration
o začetku preiskave glede možnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 511/2010 o uvozu nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, pri uvozu nekaterih žic iz molibdena, poslanih iz Malezije in Švice, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Maleziji in Švici ali ne, in o registraciji takšnega uvoza
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Articles 13(3), 14(3) and 14(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), ter zlasti člena 13(3) ter člena 14(3) in (5) Uredbe,
After having consulted the Advisory Committee in accordance with Articles 13(3) and 14(3) of the basic Regulation,
ob posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom v skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(3) osnovne uredbe,
The European Commission (the Commission) has received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People’s Republic of China and to make imports of certain molybdenum wires consigned from Malaysia and Switzerland, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and Switzerland or not, subject to registration.
(1) Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je prejela zahtevek v skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe, da razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, poslanih iz Malezije in Švice in ki jih je treba registrirati, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Maleziji in Švici ali ne.
The request was lodged on 4 April 2011 by the European Association of Metals (Eurometaux) on behalf of a Union producer of certain molybdenum wires.
Zahtevek je 4. aprila 2011 vložilo Evropsko združenje za kovine (EUROMETAUX) v imenu proizvajalca Unije, ki proizvaja nekatere žice iz molibdena.
The product concerned by the possible circumvention is molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 99,95 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN code ex81029600 (the product concerned).
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva morebitno izogibanje, je žica iz molibdena, ki vsebuje najmanj 99,95 mas. % molibdena, s prečnim prerezom med 1,35 mm in 4,0 mm, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščena v oznako KN ex81029600 („zadevni izdelek“).
The product under investigation is the same as that defined in the previous recital, but consigned from Malaysia and Switzerland, whether originating in Malaysia and Switzerland or not, currently falling within the same CN code as the product concerned.
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak kot tisti, ki je opredeljen v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, le da je poslan iz Malezije in Švice, ne glede na to, ali ima poreklo iz Malezije in Švice ali ne, trenutno uvrščen v isto oznako KN kot zadevni izdelek.
The measures currently in force and possibly being circumvented are anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 [2].
Trenutno veljavni ukrepi, katerim se domnevno izogiba, so protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 511/2010 [2].
The request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the anti-dumping measures on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People’s Republic of China are being circumvented by means of the transhipment via Malaysia and Switzerland.
Zahtevek vsebuje zadostne dokaze prima facie, da se protidampinškim ukrepom za uvoz nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske izogiba s pretovarjanjem prek Malezije in Švice.
The request shows that a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the People’s Republic of China, Malaysia and Switzerland to the Union has taken place following the imposition of measures on the product concerned, and that there is insufficient due cause or justification other than the imposition of the duty for such a change.
Iz zahtevka je razvidno, da se je po uvedbi ukrepov za zadevni izdelek znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Malezije in Švice v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe dajatve ni dovolj upravičenih razlogov ali utemeljitev.
This change in the pattern of trade appears to stem from the transhipment of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People’s Republic of China via Malaysia and Switzerland.
Videti je, da je sprememba vzorca trgovanja posledica pretovarjanja nekaterih žic iz molibdena s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske prek Malezije in Švice.
Furthermore, the request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping measures on the product concerned are being undermined in terms of quantity.
Poleg tega vsebuje zahtevek zadostne dokaze prima facie, da so popravljalni učinki obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov za zadevni izdelek glede na količino oslabljeni.
In addition, the Commission is in possession of sufficient evidence that imports of the product under investigation are made at prices well below the non-injurious price established in the investigation that led to the existing measures, adjusted for the decrease in the prices of the raw material costs.
Poleg tega ima Komisija zadostne dokaze, da uvoz izdelka v preiskavi poteka po cenah, ki so precej nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v preiskavi, na podlagi katere so bili uvedeni obstoječi ukrepi, prilagojene za upoštevanje znižanja stroškov surovin.
Finally, the request contains sufficient prima facie evidence that the prices of the product under investigation are dumped in relation to the normal value previously established for the product concerned, adjusted for the decrease in the prices of the raw material costs.
Zahtevek vsebuje zadostne dokaze prima facie, da so cene izdelka v preiskavi dampinške v primerjavi z normalno vrednostjo, ki je bila predhodno določena za zadevni izdelek, prilagojeno za znižanje stroškov surovin.
Should circumvention practices via Malaysia and Switzerland covered by Article 13 of the basic Regulation, other than transhipment, be identified in the course of the investigation, the investigation may also cover these practices.
Če se med preiskavo poleg pretovarjanja ugotovijo druge prakse izogibanja prek Malezije in Švice v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe, lahko preiskava zajame tudi te prakse.
In the light of the above, the Commission has concluded that sufficient evidence exists to justify the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation and to make imports of the product under investigation, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and Switzerland or not, subject to registration, in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, ki upravičujejo začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe ter registracijo uvoza izdelka v preiskavi v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Malezije in Švice ali ne.
In order to obtain the information it deems necessary for its investigation, the Commission will send questionnaires to the known exporters/producers and to the known associations of exporters/producers in Malaysia and Switzerland, to the known exporters/producers and to the known associations of exporters/producers in the People’s Republic of China, to the known importers and to the known associations of importers in the Union and to the authorities of the People’s Republic of China, Malaysia and Switzerland.
Za pridobitev informacij, ki so po mnenju Komisije potrebne za preiskavo, bo Komisija poslala vprašalnike znanim izvoznikom/proizvajalcem in znanim združenjem izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v Maleziji in Švici, znanim izvoznikom/proizvajalcem in znanim združenjem izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, znanim uvoznikom in znanim združenjem uvoznikov v Uniji ter organom Ljudske republike Kitajske, Malezije in Švice.
The authorities of the People’s Republic of China, Malaysia and Switzerland will be notified of the initiation of the investigation.
Organi Ljudske republike Kitajske, Malezije in Švice bodo uradno obveščeni o začetku preiskave.
Since the possible circumvention takes place outside the Union, exemptions may be granted, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation, to producers in Malaysia and Switzerland of certain molybdenum wires that can show that they are not related [3] to any producer subject to the measures [4] and that are found not to be engaged in circumvention practices as defined in Article 13(1) and (2) of the basic Regulation.
Ker do možnega izogibanja prihaja zunaj Unije, se v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe lahko odobri izvzetje proizvajalcem nekaterih žic iz molibdena v Maleziji in Švici, ki lahko dokažejo, da niso povezani [3] z nobenim proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi [4], in za katere se ugotovi, da niso vpleteni v izogibanje, kakor je opredeljeno v členu 13(1) in (2) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 14 (5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product under investigation should be made subject to registration in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings of circumvention, anti-dumping duties of an appropriate amount can be levied retroactively from the date of registration of such imports consigned from Malaysia and Switzerland.
V skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe je treba izdelek v preiskavi registrirati, da se, če bi se v preiskavi ugotovilo izogibanje, zagotovi obračunavanje protidampinških dajatev v ustrezni višini z veljavnostjo za nazaj, in sicer od datuma registracije takega uvoza, poslanega iz Malezije in Švice.
producers in Malaysia and Switzerland may request exemption from registration of imports or measures,
lahko proizvajalci v Maleziji in Švici zahtevajo izvzetje iz registracije uvoza ali ukrepov,
It is also noted that if interested parties consider that they are encountering difficulties in the exercise of their rights of defence, they may request the intervention of the Hearing Officer of Directorate-General for Trade.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da lahko zainteresirane strani, ki menijo, da imajo težave pri uveljavljanju pravic do obrambe, zahtevajo posredovanje pooblaščenca GD Trade za zaslišanje.
He acts as an interface between the interested parties and the Commission services, offering, where necessary, mediation on procedural matters affecting the protection of their interests in this proceeding, in particular with regard to issues concerning access to the file, confidentiality, extension of time limits and the treatment of written and/or oral submission of views.
Pooblaščenec je posrednik med zainteresiranimi stranmi in službami Komisije, tako da po potrebi posreduje pri postopkovnih vprašanjih, ki vplivajo na zaščito njihovih interesov v postopku, zlasti pri vprašanjih dostopa do dokumentacije, zaupnosti podatkov, podaljšanja rokov ter predložitve pisnih in/ali ustnih stališč.
For further information and contact details, interested parties may consult the Hearing Officer’s web pages on the website of Directorate-General for Trade (http://ec.europa.eu/trade),
Dodatne informacije in kontaktni podatki so zainteresiranim stranem na voljo na spletnih straneh pooblaščenca za zaslišanje na spletišču Generalnega direktorata za trgovino (http://ec.europa.eu/trade) –