natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The EUSR shall provide Member States’ missions and Union delegations in the region with regular briefings.
PPEU organizira redne informativne sestanke za misije držav članic in delegacije Unije v regiji.
In the field, close liaison shall be maintained with Union delegations and Member State Heads of Mission.
Na terenu vzdržuje tesne stike z vodji delegacij Unije in vodji misij držav članic.
The EUSR, in close coordination with the relevant Union delegations, shall provide local political guidance to the Force Commander of EUNAVFOR Atalanta and the Mission Commander of EUTM Somalia.
PPEU v tesnem sodelovanju z ustreznimi delegacijami Unije daje lokalne politične smernice poveljniku sil EUNAVFOR Atalanta in poveljniku misije EUTM Somalia.
The EUSR and the EU Operation Commander shall consult each other as required.
PPEU in poveljnik operacije EU se po potrebi posvetujeta.
The EUSR shall closely cooperate with the authorities of the countries involved, the UN, the AU, the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), other national, regional and international stakeholders, and also with civil society in the region.
PPEU tesno sodeluje z organi oblasti zadevnih držav, z ZN, AU, Medvladno agencijo za razvoj (IGAD), drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi na nacionalni, regionalni in mednarodni ravni ter civilno družbo v regiji.
The EUSR shall present to the Council, the HR and the Commission a comprehensive mandate implementation report at the end of the mandate.
PPEU ob izteku mandata predloži Svetu, VP in Komisiji celovito poročilo o izvedbi nalog.
Done at Brussels, 8 December 2011.
V Bruslju, 8. decembra 2011
of 7 December 2011
z dne 7. decembra 2011
amending Council Directive 2002/56/EC as regards the date laid down in Article 21(3) until which Member States are authorised to extend the validity of decisions concerning equivalence of seed potatoes from third countries
o spremembi Direktive Sveta 2002/56/ES glede datuma, določenega v členu 21(3), do katerega se državam članicam dovoli podaljšanje veljavnosti odločitev v zvezi z enakovrednostjo semenskega krompirja iz tretjih držav
Directive 2002/56/EC provides that, with effect from certain dates, Member States may no longer determine for themselves the equivalence of seed potatoes harvested in third countries with seed potatoes harvested within the Union and complying with that Directive.
Direktiva 2002/56/ES določa, da države članice od določenih datumov dalje ne morejo več same določati enakovrednosti semenskega krompirja, proizvedenega v tretjih državah, s semenskim krompirjem, proizvedenim v Uniji in skladnim z navedeno direktivo.
However, as work to establish a Union equivalence for seed potatoes from all the third countries concerned had not been completed, Directive 2002/56/EC permitted Member States to extend until 31 March 2011 the validity of equivalence decisions which they had already taken for seed potatoes from certain third countries not covered by a Union equivalence.
Ker delo v zvezi z določanjem enakovrednosti semenskega krompirja iz vseh zadevnih tretjih držav v Uniji še ni bilo dokončano, je bilo državam članicam z Direktivo 2002/56/ES dovoljeno, da do 31. marca 2011 podaljšajo veljavnost odločitev, ki so jih že sprejele v zvezi z enakovrednostjo semenskega krompirja iz nekaterih tretjih držav, ki niso bile zajete v enakovrednosti Unije.
Since this work still has not been completed and a new marketing season will start by the end of the year 2011, it is necessary to authorise Member States to extend the validity of their national equivalence decisions.
Ker to delo še ni končano in se bo ob koncu leta 2011 začela nova prodajna sezona, je nujno treba državam članicam dovoliti podaljšanje nacionalnih odločitev v zvezi z enakovrednostjo semenskega krompirja.
In the first subparagraph of Article 21(3) of Directive 2002/56/EC, ‘31 March 2011’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2014’.
V prvem pododstavku člena 21(3) Direktive 2002/56/ES se „31. marca 2011“ nadomesti z „31. marca 2014“.
Done at Brussels, 7 December 2011.
V Bruslju, 7. decembra 2011
on the recognition of Cape Verde pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for the training and certification of seafarers
o priznanju Zelenortskih otokov v skladu z Direktivo 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede sistemov za izobraževanje in izdajanje spričeval pomorščakom
By letters of 13 May 2005 and 1 December 2005, Cyprus submitted a request for recognition of Cape Verde.
Ciper je z dopisoma z dne 13. maja 2005 in 1. decembra 2005 zaprosil za priznanje Zelenortskih otokov.
Following that request, the Commission assessed the training and certification systems in Cape Verde in order to verify whether Cape Verde meets all the requirements of the STCW Convention and whether the appropriate measures have been taken to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Na podlagi te prošnje je Komisija ocenila sisteme za izobraževanje in izdajanje spričeval na Zelenortskih otokih, da bi preverila, ali ta država izpolnjuje zahteve Konvencije STCW in ali so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali.
By letters of 2 February 2009, 8 December 2009 and 17 September 2010, the Commission requested Cape Verde to provide evidence demonstrating that the deficiencies identified had been corrected.
Komisija je z dopisi z dne 2. februarja 2009, 8. decembra 2009 in 17. septembra 2010 od Zelenortskih otokov zahtevala predložitev dokazov, da so bile odkrite pomanjkljivosti odpravljene.
By letters of 23 April 2009, 19 January 2010, 4 December 2010, 25 February 2011, 10 March 2011 and 25 May 2011 Cape Verde provided the requested information and evidence concerning the implementation of appropriate and sufficient corrective action to address most of the deficiencies identified during the assessment of compliance.
Zelenortski otoki so z dopisi z dne 23. aprila 2009, 19. januarja 2010, 4. decembra 2010, 25. februarja 2011, 10. marca 2011 in 25. maja 2011 predložili zahtevane informacije in dokazila o izvajanju ustreznih in zadostnih korekcijskih ukrepov za odpravo večine pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih med oceno skladnosti.
The remaining shortcomings concern on the one hand missing certain training equipment at the main maritime education and training institution of Cape Verde, and on the other hand certain course content relating to Section A-III/2 of the STCW Code.
Preostale pomanjkljivosti zadevajo na eni strani pomanjkanje nekatere opreme za usposabljanje na glavni ustanovi Zelenortskih otokov za pomorsko izobraževanje in usposabljanje ter na drugi strani vsebine tečajev v zvezi z oddelkom A-III/2 Kodeksa STCW.
Cape Verde has therefore been invited to implement further corrective action in this respect.
Zelenortski otoki so bili pozvani, naj na tem področju nadaljujejo z izvajanjem korekcijskih ukrepov.
However, these shortcomings do not warrant calling into question the overall level of compliance of Cape Verde with STCW requirements on training and certification of seafarers.
Vendar te pomanjkljivosti ne upravičujejo dvomov v vsesplošno raven upoštevanja zahtev Konvencije STCW glede sistemov izobraževanja in izdajanja spričeval za pomorščake s strani Zelenortskih otokov.
The outcome of the assessment of compliance and the evaluation of the information provided by Cape Verde demonstrates that Cape Verde complies with the relevant requirements of the STCW Convention, while this country has taken appropriate measures to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Izid ocene skladnosti in ocena informacij, ki so jih predložili Zelenortski otoki, kažeta, da ta država izpolnjuje vse zahteve Konvencije STCW in da je sprejela vse ustrezne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij v zvezi s spričevali.
For the purposes of Article 19 of Directive 2008/106/EC, Cape Verde is recognised as regards the systems for the training and certification of seafarers.
Zelenortski otoki se priznajo za namene člena 19 Direktive 2008/106/ES glede sistemov za izobraževanje in izdajanje spričeval pomorščakom.
That assessment was based on the results of an inspection carried out by experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency in June 2006.
Ocena je temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcije, ki so jo junija 2006 opravili izvedenci Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost.
on the recognition of Bangladesh pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for the training and certification of seafarers
o priznanju Bangladeša v skladu z Direktivo 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede sistemov za izobraževanje in izdajanje spričeval pomorščakom
Having regard to the requests from Cyprus on 26 July 2007, from Italy on 24 December 2007 and from Belgium on 25 June 2008,
ob upoštevanju prošnje Cipra z dne 26. julija 2007, Italije z dne 24. decembra 2007 in Belgije z dne 25. junija 2008,
According to Directive 2008/106/EC Member States may decide to endorse seafarers' appropriate certificates issued by third countries, provided that the third country concerned is recognised by the Commission.
V skladu z Direktivo 2008/106/ES se lahko države članice odločijo, da overijo ustrezna spričevala pomorščakov, ki so jih izdale tretje države, če je zadevno tretjo državo priznala Komisija.
Requests for the recognition of Bangladesh have been submitted by letters of 26 July 2007 from Cyprus, of 24 December 2007 from Italy and of 25 June 2008 from Belgium.
Prošnje za priznanje Bangladeša so z dopisi predložili Ciper 26. julija 2007, Italija 24. decembra 2007 in Belgija 25. junija 2008.
Following these requests, the Commission assessed the training and certification system in Bangladesh in order to verify whether Bangladesh meets all the requirements of the STCW Convention and whether the appropriate measures have been taken to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Na podlagi teh prošenj je Komisija ocenila sisteme za izobraževanje in izdajanje spričeval v Bangladešu, da bi preverila, ali ta država izpolnjuje zahteve Konvencije STCW in ali so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali.
By letters of 26 March 2009, 9 December 2009 and 28 September 2010, the Commission requested Bangladesh to provide evidence demonstrating that the deficiencies identified had been corrected.
Komisija je z dopisi z 26. marca 2009, 9. decembra 2009 in 28. septembra 2010 od Bangladeša zahtevala predložitev dokazov, da so bile odkrite pomanjkljivosti odpravljene.
By letters of 29 March 2009, 21 May 2009, 12 July 2009, 4 January 2010, 27 February 2011 and 14 March 2011, Bangladesh provided the requested information and evidence concerning the implementation of appropriate and sufficient corrective action to address most of the deficiencies identified during the assessment of compliance.
Bangladeš je z dopisi z dne 29. marca 2009, 21. maja 2009, 12. julija 2009, 4. januarja 2010, 27. februarja 2011 in 14. marca 2011 predložil zahtevane informacije in dokazila o izvajanju ustreznih in zadostnih korekcijskih ukrepov za odpravo večine pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih med oceno skladnosti.
The remaining shortcomings concern, on the one hand, the lack of certain training equipment in one of the maritime education and training institutions of Bangladesh, and on the other hand training for preparatory courses relating to Section A-II/1 of the STCW Code.
Preostale pomanjkljivosti zadevajo na eni strani pomanjkanje nekatere opreme za usposabljanje na eni izmed ustanov Bangladeša za pomorsko izobraževanje in usposabljanje ter na drugi strani usposabljanja za pripravljalne tečaje v zvezi z oddelkom A-II/1 Kodeksa STCW.
Bangladesh has therefore been invited to implement further corrective action in this respect.
Bangladeš je bil pozvan, naj na tem področju nadaljuje z izvajanjem korekcijskih ukrepov.
However, these shortcomings do not warrant calling into question the overall level of compliance of Bangladesh with STCW requirements on training and certification of seafarers.
Vendar te pomanjkljivosti ne upravičujejo dvomov v vsesplošno raven upoštevanja zahtev Konvencije STCW glede sistemov izobraževanja in izdajanja spričeval za pomorščake s strani Bangladeša.
The outcome of the assessment of compliance and the evaluation of the information provided by Bangladesh demonstrates that Bangladesh complies with the relevant requirements of the STCW Convention, while this country has taken appropriate measures to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Izid ocene skladnosti in ocena informacij, ki jih je predložil Bangladeš, kažeta, da ta država izpolnjuje vse zahteve Konvencije STCW in da je sprejela vse ustrezne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij v zvezi s spričevali.
For the purposes of Article 19 of Directive 2008/106/EC, Bangladesh is recognised as regards the systems for the training and certification of seafarers.
Bangladeš se prizna za namene člena 19 Direktive 2008/106/ES glede sistemov za izobraževanje in izdajanje spričeval pomorščakom.
That assessment was based on the results of an inspection carried out by experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency in February 2008.
Ocena je temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcije, ki so jo februarja 2008 opravili izvedenci Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost.
on the measures C 11/09 (ex NN 53b/08, NN 2/10 and N 19/10) implemented by the Dutch State for ABN AMRO Group NV (created following the merger between Fortis Bank Nederland and ABN AMRO N)
o ukrepih C 11/09 (ex NN 53b/08, NN 2/10 in N 19/10), ki jih je Nizozemska izvedla za skupino ABN AMRO NV (ustanovljeno po združitvi banke Fortis Bank Nederland in banke ABN AMRO N)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments [1] pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe [1] v skladu s členom 108(2) Pogodbe, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 3 October 2008, the Dutch State acquired Fortis Bank Nederland (‘FBN’) (namely the Dutch banking subsidiary of the financial holding company Fortis SA/NV [2]) including ABN AMRO Holding assets owned by FBN (‘ABN AMRO N’) for an amount of EUR 12,8 billion. In the same transaction, the Dutch State also replaced Fortis Bank SA/NV, the Belgian banking subsidiary of Fortis SA/NV, as obligee in loans to FBN with a nominal value of EUR 16,1 billion [3].
Nizozemska je 3. oktobra 2008 kupila banko Fortis Bank Nederland (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka FBN) (tj. nizozemsko hčerinsko bančno družbo finančnega holdinga Fortis SA/NV [2]), vključno s sredstvi holdinga ABN AMRO Holding v lasti banke FBN (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka ABN AMRO N) za 12,8 milijarde EUR. Pri isti transakciji je Nizozemska od banke Fortis Bank SA/NV, belgijske hčerinske bančne družbe holdinga Fortis SA/NV, odkupila tudi posojila, ki jih je prejela banka FBN, v nominalni vrednosti 16,1 milijarde EUR [3].
The Dutch State also granted FBN a short-term liquidity facility of EUR 45 billion and agreed to indemnify Fortis SA/NV for costs and obligations which stemmed from the consortium shareholders agreement ( ‘CSA’).
Nizozemska je banki FBN odobrila tudi kratkoročno likvidnostno posojilo v višini 45 milijard EUR in soglašala, da bo holdingu Fortis SA/NV poravnala stroške in obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz sporazuma delničarjev konzorcija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SDK).
The CSA described the rights and obligations of the three financial institutions (Fortis SA/NV, Banco Santander and Royal Bank of Scotland (‘RBS’) or the three ‘consortium members’) which had jointly bid for ABN AMRO Holding via the newly created legal entity ‘RFS Holdings’.
V SDK so bile opisane pravice in obveznosti treh finančnih ustanov (holdinga Fortis SA/NV, banke Banco Santander in banke Royal Bank of Scotland (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka RBS) oziroma treh „članov konzorcija“), ki so se preko novoustanovljenega pravnega subjekta „RFS Holdings“ skupaj potegovale za holding ABN AMRO Holding.
On 7 October 2008, the Dutch State notified the Commission of its measures of 3 October 2008 (namely the acquisition of FBN for EUR 12,8 billion, the novation of long-term loans with a nominal value of EUR 16,1 billion and the short-term liquidity facility of EUR 45 billion, hereafter ‘the integrated transactions of 3 October 2008’) as measures not constituting State aid in order to get legal certainty on those measures.
Nizozemska je 7. oktobra 2008 Komisiji priglasila svoje ukrepe z dne 3. oktobra 2008 (tj. nakup banke FBN za 12,8 milijarde EUR, prenovitev dolgoročnih posojil z nominalno vrednostjo 16,1 milijarde EUR in kratkoročno likvidnostno posojilo v višini 45 milijard EUR, v nadaljnjem besedilu: celovite transakcije z dne 3. oktobra 2008) kot ukrepe, ki ne pomenijo državne pomoči, da bi glede teh ukrepov pridobila pravno varnost.
Since the measures had already been implemented, the Commission registered the case as an NN-case (that is, NN53b/08).
Ker so bili ti ukrepi že izvedeni, je Komisija zadevo evidentirala kot zadevo NN (tj. pod številko NN53b/08).
During the negotiations leading to the acquisition of FBN on 3 October 2008, the Dutch State relied on an external valuation report by […] [4], a copy of which was sent to the Commission on 15 October 2008.
Med pogajanji, ki so privedla do nakupa banke FBN 3. oktobra 2008, se je Nizozemska sklicevala na zunanje poročilo o vrednotenju […] [4], katerega kopija je bila poslana Komisiji 15. oktobra 2008.
By letter dated 30 October 2008, the Commission informed the Dutch Ministry of Finance of its preliminary opinion that the measures of 3 October 2008 seemed to constitute State aid to FBN.
Z dopisom z dne 30. oktobra 2008 je Komisija nizozemskemu ministrstvu za finance sporočila svoje predhodno mnenje, da ukrepi z dne 3. oktobra 2008 pomenijo državno pomoč banki FBN.
On 20 November 2008, a meeting took place between the services of the Commission and the Dutch State.
Predstavniki služb Komisije in Nizozemske so se sestali 20. novembra 2008.
On 21 November 2008, the Dutch State officially decided that it would not keep FBN and ABN AMRO N apart, but instead would pursue a merger of the two companies (‘the merger’), in line with the earlier plans of Fortis SA/NV.
Nizozemska se je 21. novembra 2008 uradno odločila, da banka FBN in banka ABN AMRO N ne bosta več ločeni, ampak ju bo združila (v nadaljnjem besedilu: združitev), kot je načrtoval že holding Fortis SA/NV.
On 3 December 2008, the Commission took a Decision [5] (‘the Decision of 3 December 2008’) declaring the measures by the Dutch State of 3 October 2008 in favour of Fortis Bank SA/NV as State aid compatible with the common market.
Komisija je 3. decembra 2008 sprejela odločbo [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločba z dne 3. decembra 2008), s katero je ukrepe Nizozemske z dne 3. oktobra 2008 v korist holdinga Fortis SA/NV razglasila za državno pomoč, združljivo s skupnim trgom.
However, recital 4 of that Decision stated explicitly that the Commission would judge in a separate procedure whether the measures implemented on 3 October 2008 also contained aid to FBN.
Vendar je v uvodni izjavi 4 te odločbe izrecno navedeno, da bo Komisija v ločenem postopku ocenila, ali ukrepi, uvedeni 3. oktobra 2008, pomenijo tudi pomoč banki FBN.
On 24 December 2008, RBS, Banco Santander and the Dutch State signed an amendment to the CSA by which the Dutch State replaced Fortis SA/NV in the CSA.
Banka RBS, banka Banco Santander in Nizozemska so 24. decembra 2008 podpisale spremembo SDK, s katero je Nizozemska v SDK zamenjala holding Fortis SA/NV.
On 6 March 2009, the Dutch State sent to the Commission a due diligence report [6] of the acquired businesses which had been prepared by […] at the request of the Dutch State.
Nizozemska je 6. marca 2009 Komisiji poslala poročilo o skrbnem pregledu poslovanja [6] prevzetih podjetij, ki ga je pripravil […] na zahtevo Nizozemske.
By Decision of 8 April 2009 (‘the Decision of 8 April 2009’), the Commission initiated the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty under case number C11/09 (ex-NN53b/08), with respect to alleged aid granted to FBN and ABN AMRO N.
Komisija je z odločbo z dne 8. aprila 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločba z dne 8. aprila 2009) začela postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe pod številko zadeve C11/09 (ex-NN53b/08) glede domnevne pomoči, dodeljene banki FBN in banki ABN AMRO N.
On 6 May 2009, the Commission received a letter of complaint from Van Lanschot Bank (‘the complainant’), a Dutch competitor of FBN and ABN AMRO N. That letter was forwarded by the Commission to the Dutch State on 22 July 2009, asking for comments.
Komisija je 6. maja 2009 prejela pritožbo banke Van Lanschot Bank (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik), nizozemskega konkurenta banke FBN in banke ABN AMRO N. To pritožbo je Komisija 22. julija 2009 posredovala Nizozemski in jo pozvala, naj predloži pripombe.
In a non-paper sent on 15 June 2009 and during a follow-up meeting with the Commission on 16 June 2009, the Dutch State informed the Commission of its intention to implement a EUR 2,5 billion recapitalisation plan enabling ABN AMRO N to separate from its parent company ABN AMRO Bank [7].
Z neuradnim dokumentom z dne 15. junija 2009 in na naslednjem sestanku s Komisijo 16. junija 2009 je Nizozemska obvestila Komisijo o nameri, da izvede načrt dokapitalizacije v višini 2,5 milijarde EUR, ki bo banki ABN AMRO N omogočila ločitev od njenega matičnega podjetja ABN AMRO Bank [7].
During that meeting, the Dutch State indicated that, after the first injection of EUR 2,5 billion, additional but not yet quantifiable measures would be necessary.
Na tem sestanku je Nizozemska navedla, da bodo po prvem vložku v višini 2,5 milijarde EUR potrebni dodatni ukrepi, ki pa jih še ni mogoče količinsko opredeliti.
On 9 July 2009, the Dutch State informed the Commission that FBN had redeemed all the short-term funding it had received from the Dutch State under the 3 October 2008 liquidity facility of EUR 45 billion.
Nizozemska je 9. julija 2009 obvestila Komisijo, da je banka FBN v celoti odplačala kratkoročno financiranje, ki ga je prejela od Nizozemske v okviru likvidnostnega posojila z dne 3. oktobra 2008 v višini 45 milijard EUR.
On 15 July 2009, the Dutch State informed the Commission of plans by FBN to acquire Fortis Clearing Americas (‘FCA’) from Fortis Bank SA/NV.
Nizozemska je 15. julija 2009 Komisijo obvestila o načrtih banke FBN, da od holdinga Fortis Bank SA/NV odkupi banko Fortis Clearing Americas (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka FCA).
On 17 July 2009, the Dutch State formally notified a plan with recapitalisation measures worth EUR 2,5 billion [8] consisting of a credit default swap (‘CDS’) with a capital relief effect of EUR 1,7 billion (‘the capital relief instrument’ or ‘CRI’) and a Mandatory Convertible Security (‘MCS’) of EUR 800 million. The measures were initially recorded under case number N429/09, but since the measures were implemented before the Commission had taken a decision on them, the case was moved from the register of notified aid to the non-notified aid register (under number NN 2/10).
Nizozemska je 17. julija 2009 uradno priglasila načrt z ukrepi dokapitalizacije v višini 2,5 milijarde EUR, [8] sestavljen iz instrumenta zamenjave kreditnega tveganja (credit default swap, v nadaljnjem besedilu: CDS) z učinkom na razbremenitev kapitala v višini 1,7 milijarde EUR (instrument za razbremenitev kapitala – the capital relief instrument, v nadaljnjem besedilu: CRI) in izdajo obvezno zamenljivega vrednostnega papirja (mandatory convertible security, v nadaljnjem besedilu: MCS) v vrednosti 800 milijonov EUR. Ukrepi so bili sprva evidentirani pod številko zadeve N429/09, vendar ker so bili uvedeni, preden je Komisija glede njih sprejela odločitev, je bila zadeva iz registra priglašenih pomoči premaknjena v register nepriglašene pomoči (pod številko NN 2/10).
On 10 September 2009, the Dutch State sent a non-paper to the Commission with an update of the separation process and indications that additional (unquantified) State aid measures would be unavoidable.
Nizozemska je 10. septembra 2009 Komisiji poslala neuradni dokument z najnovejšimi informacijami glede postopka ločitve in navedbami, da so dodatni (količinsko neopredeljivi) ukrepi državne pomoči neizogibni.