natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As the countervailing duty has now expired, the level of the anti-dumping duty rates has to be redetermined.
Zaradi izteka izravnalne dajatve je treba ponovno določiti stopnje protidampinških dajatev.
Determination of anti-dumping duty level
Določitev stopnje protidampinške dajatve
Pursuant to Article 9(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, the amount of the anti-dumping duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping established but should be less than that margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury to the Union industry.
V skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe znesek protidampinške dajatve ne sme preseči ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, ampak bi moral biti nižji od navedene stopnje, če bi taka nižja dajatev zadoščala za odpravo škode industriji Unije.
Consequently, the duty level should be established at the lowest level of the dumping margin and injury elimination level.
Stopnjo dajatve bi bilo zato treba določiti na najnižji stopnji dampinga in odprave škode.
In this respect, it is recalled that, in the original anti-dumping investigation, the injury elimination level was in all cases above the dumping margins, as laid out in recital 195 of Regulation (EC) No 367/2001 and confirmed by recital 74 of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.
Pri tem je treba opozoriti, da je bila pri prvotni protidampinški preiskavi stopnja odprave škode v vseh primerih nad stopnjami dampinga, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 195 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 367/2001 in potrjeno v uvodni izjavi 74 Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001.
Therefore, the anti-dumping duty should be set at the level of the dumping margins established in respect of the various Indian manufacturers, which are as follows:
Zato bi bilo treba protidampinško dajatev določiti v višini stopenj dampinga, določenih glede na različne indijske proizvajalce, ki so:
Dumping margin and AD duty rate
Stopnja dampinga in stopnja protidampinške dajatve
Regulation (EC) No 366/2006
Uredba (ES) št. 366/2006
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 38/2011 [12]
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 38/2011 [12]
Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [15]
Uredba (ES) št. 1676/2001 [15]
Regulation (EC) No 1424/2006 [13]
Uredba (ES) št. 1424/2006 [13]
Regulation (EC) No 366/2006 [16]
Uredba (ES) št. 366/2006 [16]
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 205/2011 [14]
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 205/2011 [14]
All other companies (except MTZ Polyfilms)
Vse druge družbe (razen MTZ Polyfilms)
All known Indian exporting producers of PET film, the Indian authorities and the Union industry of PET film have received disclosure of the above course of action.
Vsi znani indijski proizvajalci izvozniki folije iz PET, indijski organi in industrija Unije folije iz PET so bili obveščeni o navedenem poteku dejavnosti.
Following this disclosure, several Indian companies argued that, as no expiry review was requested for the countervailing measures, the Union industry was apparently in good shape and, therefore, the anti-dumping measures should be terminated as well.
Po takem razkritju je več indijskih družb trdilo, da ker pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa za izravnalne ukrepe ni bil zahtevan, je bila industrija Unije očitno v dobrem stanju in bi zato bilo treba tudi odpraviti protidampinške ukrepe.
In addition, one exporting producer argued that the average dumping margin of the sample should be recalculated since, following an interim review, Garware Polyester Limited, which was one of the companies in the sample, had recently been made subject to a revised individual dumping margin.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je poleg tega trdil, da bi bilo treba povprečno stopnjo dampinga vzorca ponovno izračunati, saj je po vmesnem pregledu Garware Polyester Limited, ki je bila ena od družb v vzorcu, trenutno postala predmet popravljene individualne stopnje dampinga.
It should be noted that both claims go beyond the limited scope of the current Regulation which only aims at adjusting the level of the existing anti-dumping duty rates following the expiry of the concurrent countervailing measures on the same imports.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da obe trditvi presegata omejen obseg te uredbe, katere cilj je zgolj prilagoditev obstoječih stopenj protidampinških dajatev po izteku sočasnih izravnalnih ukrepov glede istega uvoza.
Any request to amend the level of the anti-dumping duty rates following an alleged change in circumstances should be presented pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Vsako zahtevo za spremembo stopenj protidampinških dajatev po domnevni spremembi okoliščin bi bilo treba predložiti v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, these claims have to be rejected.
Zato je treba te trditve zavrniti.
One Indian exporting producer argued that, as the countervailing duties had expired, the Commission should now grant a price adjustment to the Indian exporters using the DEPB scheme, which it had refused during the original investigation and interim review investigation.
Eden indijski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi morala Komisija zdaj, ko se je izravnalna dajatev iztekla, odobriti prilagoditev cene indijskim izvoznikom s shemo DEPB, ki jo je Komisija zavrnila med prvotno preiskavo in delnim vmesnim pregledom.
Without prejudice to whether such claim could be examined in the context of the current amending Regulation, it should be noted that, as summarised in recital 50 of Regulation (EC) No 367/2001 and recital 47 of the amending anti-dumping Regulation, the price adjustment claim for DEPB had not been accepted as the producers concerned had not demonstrated that price comparability between domestic and EU sales prices had been affected by the DEPB benefits.
Ne glede na to, ali bi tako trditev bilo možno preučiti v okviru trenutne uredbe o spremembi, bi bilo treba opozoriti, da kot je povzeto v uvodni izjavi 50 Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2001 in uvodni izjavi 47 protidampinške uredbe o spremembi, trditev o spremembi cene za DEPB ni bila sprejeta, saj zadevni proizvajalci niso pokazali, da ugodnosti DEPB na primerljivost cen med domačimi prodajnimi cenami in prodajnimi cenami v EU niso vplivale.
That situation has not changed with the expiry of the countervailing duty and this claim, therefore, has to be rejected.
Ker se navedeni položaj z iztekom izravnalne dajatve ni spremenil, je treba to trditev zavrniti.
No further substantive comments were received.
Druge vsebinske pripombe niso bile prejete.
Consequently, the duty rates should be revised to the levels of the dumping margin, as indicated in the table under recital 8 above,
Stopnje dajatev bi zato bilo treba spremeniti na višino stopnje dampinga, kot je navedeno v razpredelnici v uvodni izjavi 8 –
Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 is replaced by the following:
Uredba (ES) št. 1292/2007 se spremeni: Člen 2(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke, proizvedene v spodaj navedenih družbah, znaša:
All other companies (except MTZ Polyfilms Limited – TARIC additional code A031 [17])
Vse druge družbe (razen MTZ Polyfilms Limited – dodatna oznaka TARIC A031 [17])
OJ L 55, 24.2.2001, p. 16.
UL L 55, 24.2.2001, str. 16.
OJ C 131, 20.5.2010, p. 3.
UL C 131, 20.5.2010, str. 3.
European Court Reports 2009, p. II-04133.
Zbirka odločb 2009, str. II-04133.
Notice of expiry (OJ C 68, 3.3.2011, p. 6).
Obvestilo o izteku, UL C 68, 3.3.2011, str. 6.
OJ L 15, 20.1.2011, p. 1.
UL L 15, 20.1.2011, str. 1.
OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 14.
UL L 58, 3.3.2011, str. 14.
Jindal Poly Films Limited was at that time known as Jindal Polyester Limited.
Jindal Poly Films Limited je bila takrat znana kot Jindal Polyester Limited
Uflex Limited was at that time known as Flex Industries Limited.
Uflex Limited je bila takrat znana kot Flex Industries Limited
As regards MTZ Polyfilms Limited (New India Centre, 5th Floor, 17 Co-operage Road, Mumbai 400039, India), reference is made to the notice published in OJ C 131, 20.5.2010, p. 3.’
Glede MTZ Polyfilms Limited (New India Centre, 5th Floor, 17 Co-operage Road, Mumbai 400039, Indija), se sklicevanje nanaša na obvestilo, objavljeno v UL C 131, 20.5.2010, str. 3.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 470/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 470/2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 laying down detailed rules of application for the marketing years 2009/2010 to 2014/2015 for the import and refining of sugar products of tariff heading 1701 under preferential agreements
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 828/2009 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje uvoza in prečiščevanja proizvodov iz tarifne številke 1701 v sektorju sladkorja v okviru preferencialnih sporazumov za tržna leta od 2009/2010 do 2014/2015
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1100/2006 and (EC) No 964/2007 [2], and in particular Article 11(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 z dne 22. julija 2008 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 in spremembah uredb (ES) št. 552/97, (ES) št. 1933/2006 in uredb Komisije (ES) št. 1100/2006 in (ES) št. 964/2007 [2] ter zlasti člena 11(7) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 1(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 [3], a country listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 or listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 is eligible to be added to Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009.
V skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 828/2009 [3] je država, ki je uvrščena v seznam v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 ali v seznam najmanj razvitih držav v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 732/2008, upravičena do uvrstitve v Prilogo I k Uredbi (ES) št. 828/2009.
Uganda is a least-developed country listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 and has requested the Commission to be listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009.
Uganda, ki je ena od najmanj razvitih držav s seznama najmanj razvitih držav v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 732/2008, je zaprosila Komisijo za uvrstitev na seznam v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 828/2009.
Uganda produces sugar and is therefore a potential exporter to the European Union.
Uganda proizvaja sladkor in je zato potencialna izvoznica v Evropsko unijo.
Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 828/2009 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Del I Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 828/2009 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Least-developed countries
Najmanj razvite države
NON-ACP-LDC
Najmanj razvite države, ki niso AKP
ACP-LDC
Najmanj razvite države AKP
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 471/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 471/2011
on the division between ‘deliveries’ and ‘direct sales’ of national milk quotas fixed for 2010/2011 in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
o razdelitvi nacionalnih mlečnih kvot med „oddajo“ in „neposredno prodajo“, določenih za obdobje 2010/2011 v Prilogi IX k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007
Article 67(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 provides that producers may have one or two individual quotas, one for deliveries and the other for direct sales and quantities may be converted from one quota to the other only by the competent authority of the Member State, at the duly justified request of the producer.
Člen 67(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 določa, da imajo lahko proizvajalci eno ali dve individualni kvoti, eno za oddajo in drugo za neposredno prodajo, ter da se te količine na ustrezno utemeljeno zahtevo proizvajalca lahko pretvorijo iz ene kvote v drugo.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 445/2010 of 21 May 2010 on the division between ‘deliveries’ and ‘direct sales’ of national milk quotas fixed for 2009/2010 in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 [2] sets out the division between ‘deliveries’ and ‘direct sales’ for the period from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2010 for all Member States.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 445/2010 z dne 21. maja 2010 o razdelitvi nacionalnih mlečnih kvot med „oddajo“ in „neposredno prodajo“, določenih za obdobje 2009/2010 v Prilogi IX k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 [2], določa razdelitev med „oddajo“ in „neposredno prodajo“ za obdobje od 1. aprila 2009 do 31. marca 2010 za vse države članice.
It is therefore appropriate to establish the division between ‘deliveries’ and ‘direct sales’ of the national quotas applicable for the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011 fixed in Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Zato je ustrezno, da se določi razdelitev nacionalnih kvot med „oddajo“ in „neposredno prodajo“ iz Priloge IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporablja za obdobje od 1. aprila 2010 do 31. marca 2011.
The division, applicable for the period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011, between ‘deliveries’ and ‘direct sales’ of the national quotas fixed in Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 is set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Razdelitev nacionalnih kvot med „oddajo“ in „neposredno prodajo“ iz Priloge IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporablja za obdobje od 1. aprila 2010 do 31. marca 2011, je določena v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
OJ L 126, 22.5.2010, p. 14.
UL L 126, 22.5.2010, str. 14.
The Finnish national quota as referred to in Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and the total amount of the Finnish national quota as indicated in the Annex to this Regulation differ due to a quota increase of 784683 tonnes to compensate Finnish SLOM producers in the past pursuant to Article 67(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Finska nacionalna kvota iz Priloge IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007 in skupna finska nacionalna kvota iz Priloge k tej uredbi se razlikujeta, ker je bila kvota v skladu s členom 67(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 v preteklosti povečana za 784683 ton kot nadomestilo finskim proizvajalcem SLOM.
The total national quotas for all Member States fixed in point 1 of Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 72/2009 [4] were increased with 1 %, effective from 1 April 2010, except for Italy whose quota was already increased with 5 %, effective from 1 April 2009.
Skupne nacionalne kvote za vse države članice, določene v točki 1 Priloge IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 72/2009 [4], so se povečale za 1 % z učinkom od 1. aprila 2010, razen za Italijo, katere kvota je že bila povečana za 5 % z učinkom od 1. aprila 2009.
Member States, except Italy and Malta which has no direct sales part of its national quota, have notified the Commission of the division between ‘deliveries’ and ‘direct sales’ of the additional quota.
Države članice razen Italije in Malte, ki v svoji nacionalni kvoti nima neposredne prodajne količine, so obvestile Komisijo o razdelitvi dodatne kvote med „oddajo“ in „neposredno prodajo“.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 472/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 472/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 May 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 17. maja 2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 473/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 473/2011
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 463/2011 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 463/2011 [4].
OJ L 124, 13.5.2011, p. 45.
UL L 124, 13.5.2011, str. 45.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 17 May 2011
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 17. maja 2011
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 474/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 474/2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1425/2006 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vreč in vrečk iz plastičnih mas s poreklom med drugim iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 13(3), 14(3) and 14(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba) [1], zlasti člena 13(3) ter člena 14(3) in (5) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 [2] (‘the original Regulation’), the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports into the Union of certain plastic sacks and bags, originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1425/2006 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna uredba) uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vreč in vrečk iz plastičnih mas s poreklom med drugim iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK) v Unijo.
Given the large number of cooperating Chinese exporting producers, a sample of exporting producers was selected and individual duty rates ranging from 4,8 % to 12,8 % were imposed on companies included in the sample, while on other cooperating companies not included in the sample and listed in Annex I to the original Regulation was imposed a duty rate of 8,4 %.
Zaradi velikega števila sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bil izbran vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov, družbam, vključenim v vzorec, pa je bila določena individualna stopnja dajatve od 4,8 % do 12,8 %, medtem ko je bila drugim družbam, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec in so navedene v Prilogi I k prvotni uredbi, naložena stopnja dajatve 8,4 %.
A duty rate of 28,8 % (‘residual duty rate’) was imposed on Chinese companies which either did not make themselves known or did not cooperate with the investigation of dumping which covered the period from 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005 (‘the original investigation’).
Stopnja dajatve 28,8 % (v nadaljnjem besedilu: stopnja preostale dajatve) je bila uvedena za kitajske družbe, ki se niso javile ali niso sodelovale v preiskavi o dampingu v obdobju od 1. aprila 2004 do 31. marca 2005 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvotna preiskava).
By Regulation (EC) No 189/2009 [3], amending the original Regulation, and in accordance with Article 2 of the original Regulation, three Chinese companies were added to the list of producers from the PRC listed in Annex I.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 189/2009 [3] o spremembah prvotne uredbe in v skladu s členom 2 prvotne uredbe so bile na seznam proizvajalcev iz LRK v Prilogi I dodane tri kitajske družbe.
Ex officio initiation
Začetek po uradni dolžnosti
Prima facie evidence at the disposal of the Commission indicated that, following the imposition of measures, a change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC to the Union took place for which there was insufficient due cause or justification other than the imposition of the duties in force.
Dokazi prima facie, ki so Komisiji na voljo, so pokazali, da se je po uvedbi ukrepov spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoze iz LRK v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe dajatve ni dovolj upravičenih razlogov ali utemeljitve.
This change in the pattern of trade appeared to stem from exports to the Union of the product concerned produced by Chinese exporting producers subject to the residual duty rate through a Chinese exporting producer benefiting from a lower duty rate, namely the company Xiamen Xingxia Polymers Co., Ltd (‘Xiamen’) listed in Annex I to the original Regulation.
Videti je bilo, da je ta sprememba vzorca trgovanja posledica uvoza v Unijo zadevnega izdelka kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, za katere velja stopnja preostale dajatve, prek kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika, za katerega velja nižja stopnja dajatve, in sicer družbe Xiamen Xingxia Polymers Co., Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Xiamen), navedene v Prilogi I k prvotni uredbi.
Furthermore, the evidence pointed to the fact that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping measures on the product concerned were being undermined in terms of prices.
Poleg tega so dokazi opozarjali na dejstvo, da so bili popravljalni učinki obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov za zadevni izdelek glede cene oslabljeni.
There was sufficient prima facie evidence that the imports of the product concerned were at prices well below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation that led to the existing measures.
Obstajali so zadostni dokazi prima facie, da je uvoz zadevnega izdelka potekal po cenah, ki so precej nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v prvotni preiskavi, na podlagi katere so bili uvedeni obstoječi ukrepi.
Finally, the Commission had sufficient prima facie evidence at its disposal that the prices of the product concerned are dumped in relation to the normal value previously established.
Nazadnje je imela Komisija na voljo zadostne dokaze prima facie, da so cene zadevnega izdelka dampinške v primerjavi z normalno vrednostjo, ki je bila predhodno določena.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the Commission adopted Regulation (EU) No 748/2010 [4] initiating an investigation of the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures (‘the initiating Regulation’).
Ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da je dovolj dokazov za začetek preiskave na podlagi člena 13 osnovne uredbe, je sprejela Uredbo (EU) št. 748/2010 [4] v skladu s katero se je začela preiskava, da bi se preiskalo domnevno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o začetku preiskave).
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, by the initiating Regulation, also directed the customs authorities to register imports of the product concerned declared as having been manufactured by Xiamen under the specific TARIC additional code A981 attributed to them in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings of circumvention, anti-dumping duties of an appropriate amount can be levied retroactively from the date of registration of such imports.
V skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe je Komisija z uredbo o začetku preiskave tudi dala navodila carinskim organom, da registrirajo uvoz zadevnega izdelka, prijavljenega, da ga izdeluje družba Xiamen, s posebno dodatno oznako TARIC A981, ki mu je dodeljena, da se v primeru ugotovitve izogibanja zagotovi obračunavanje protidampinških dajatev v ustrezni višini z veljavnostjo za nazaj, in sicer od datuma registracije takega uvoza.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, Xiamen, as well as the companies allegedly having their products exported through Xiamen (‘the other exporting producers’) of the initiation of the investigation and sent questionnaires.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila organe LRK, družbo Xiamen in družbe, ki svoje izdelke domnevno izvažajo v Unijo prek družbe Xiamen (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „drugi proizvajalci izvozniki“), in poslala vprašalnike.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da v roku iz uredbe o začetku preiskave pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.