natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In case of cargo ships constructed before 1 July 2002 the VDR may be a simplified voyage data recorder (S-VDR), which shall comply with the technical and performance standards developed in accordance with Chapter V of SOLAS.
V primeru tovornih ladij, ki so bile izdelane pred 1. julijem 2002, je VDR lahko poenostavljeni zapisovalnik podatkov o plovbi (S-VDR), ki je v skladu s tehničnimi in izvedbenimi standardi, razvitimi v skladu s poglavjem V SOLAS.
SHIPS ENGAGED ON NON-INTERNATIONAL VOYAGES
LADJE, KI OPRAVLJAJO POTOVANJA, KI NISO MEDNARODNA
Automatic identification systems (AIS)
Sistemi samodejnega prepoznavanja (AIS)
Passenger ships, irrespective of size, and all other ships of 300 gross tonnage and upwards engaged on a non-international voyage shall be fitted with an automatic identification system (AIS) which complies with the technical and performance standards laid down in Chapter V of SOLAS.
Potniške ladje, ne glede na velikost, ter vse druge ladje, z bruto tonažo 300 in več, ki opravljajo potovanja, ki niso mednarodna, so opremljene s sistemom samodejnega prepoznavanja (AIS) v skladu s tehničnimi in izvedbenimi standardi iz poglavja V SOLAS.
Voyage data recorder (VDR) systems
Sistemi zapisovanja podatkov o plovbi (VDR)
Passenger ships, irrespective of size, and ships other than passenger ships, of 3000 gross tonnage and upwards and constructed on or after 1 July 2002 engaged on a non-international voyage shall be fitted with a voyage data recorder (VDR) which complies with the technical and performance standards developed in accordance with Chapter V of SOLAS.
Potniške ladje, ne glede na velikost, ter vse ladje, ki niso potniške ladje, z bruto tonažo 3000 in več, ki so bile izdelane 1. julija 2002 ali pozneje in opravljajo potovanja, ki niso mednarodna, so opremljene s sistemom zapisovanja podatkov o plovbi (VDR) v skladu s tehničnimi in izvedbenimi standardi, razvitimi v skladu s poglavjem V SOLAS.
Cargo ships of 3000 gross tonnage and upwards constructed before 1 July 2002 engaged on a non-international voyage shall be fitted with a voyage data recorder (VDR) or with a simplified voyage data recorder (S-VDR) which complies with the technical and performance standards developed in accordance with Chapter V of SOLAS.
Tovorne ladje z bruto tonažo 3000 in več, ki so bile izdelane pred 1. julijem 2002 in opravljajo potovanja, ki niso mednarodna, so opremljene s sistemom zapisovanja podatkov o plovbi (VDR) ali poenostavljenim zapisovalnikom podatkov o plovbi (S-VDR) v skladu s tehničnimi in izvedbenimi standardi, razvitimi v skladu s poglavjem V SOLAS.
Exemptions from the requirement to carry AIS on board
Izjeme od zahteve za namestitev AIS na krovu
Member States may exempt passenger ships below 15 metres in length or 300 gross tonnage engaged on non-international voyages from the application of the requirements concerning AIS laid down in this Annex.
Države članice lahko oprostijo potniške ladje, krajše od 15 metov ali z bruto tonažo pod 300, ki opravljajo potovanja, ki niso mednarodna, uporabe zahtev v zvezi z AIS iz te priloge.
Member States may exempt ships, other than passenger ships, of 300 gross tonnage and upwards but less than 500 gross tonnage sailing exclusively within the internal waters of a Member State and outside routes normally used by other ships fitted with AIS, from the carriage requirements for AIS laid down in this Annex.
Države članice lahko izvzamejo ladje, ki niso potniške ladje, z bruto tonažo 300 in več, vendar manj kot 500, ki plujejo izključno v notranjih vodah države članice in zunaj poti, ki jih običajno uporabljajo druge ladje, opremljene z AIS, iz zahtev za prevoz v zvezi z AIS iz te priloge.
Exemptions from the requirement to carry a VDR or S-VDR on board
Izjeme od zahteve za namestitev VDR ali S-VDR na krovu
Member States may grant exemptions from the requirement to be fitted with a VDR or an S-VDR as follows:
Države članice lahko dovolijo izjeme od zahteve za namestitev VDR ali S-VDR, kot sledi:
Passenger ships only on voyages in sea areas other than those covered by Class A, as referred to in Article 4 of Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, may be exempted from the requirement to be fitted with a VDR.
potniške ladje, ki opravljajo samo potovanja v morskih območjih, razen tistih, zajetih v razredu A, kakor je navedeno v členu 4 Direktive 2009/45/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, se lahko izvzamejo iz zahteve, da so opremljene z VDR,
Ships, other than ro-ro passenger ships, constructed before 1 July 2002 may be exempted from the requirement to be fitted with a VDR where it can be demonstrated that interfacing a VDR with the existing equipment on the ship is unreasonable and impracticable.
ladje, razen RO-RO potniških ladij, izdelane pred 1. julijem 2002, se lahko izvzamejo iz zahteve, da so opremljene z VDR, če se lahko dokaže, da je priključitev VDR na obstoječo opremo na ladji neprimerna in nepraktična,
Cargo ships constructed before 1 July 2002, engaged on international or non-international voyages, may be exempted from the requirement to be fitted with an S-VDR if such ships are to be taken permanently out of service within two years of the implementation date specified in Chapter V of SOLAS.
tovorne ladje, izdelane pred 1. julijem 2002, ki opravljajo mednarodna potovanja ali potovanja, ki niso mednarodna, se lahko izvzamejo iz zahteve, da so opremljene s S-VDR, če bodo dokončno vzete iz uporabe v dveh letih po datumu izvajanja, ki je določen v poglavju V SOLAS.
OJ L 163, 25.6.2009, p. 1.’
UL L 163, 25.6.2009, str. 1.“
Measures available to Member States in the event of a threat to maritime safety and the protection of the environment
Ukrepi, ki so na voljo državam članicam v primeru grožnje za pomorsko varnost in varstvo okolja
Where, following an incident or circumstance of the type described in Article 17 affecting a ship, the competent authority of the Member State concerned deems, within the framework of international law, that it is necessary to avert, lessen or remove a serious and imminent threat to its coastline or related interests, the safety of other ships and their crews and passengers or of persons on shore or to protect the marine environment, that authority may, in particular:
Kadar po izrednem dogodku ali okoliščini vrste, opisane v členu 17, ki prizadene ladjo, pristojni organ zadevne države članice meni, da je treba v okviru mednarodnega prava preprečiti, zmanjšati ali odstraniti resno in neposredno grožnjo za njihovo obalo ali z njo povezane interese, varnost drugih ladij in njihovih posadk ter potnikov ali oseb na kopnem ali zaščititi morsko okolje, ta organ lahko med drugim:
restrict the movement of the ship or direct it to follow a specific course.
omeji gibanje ladje ali jo usmeri v določeno smer.
This requirement does not affect the master’s responsibility for the safe handling of his ship;
Ta zahteva ne vpliva na odgovornost poveljnika za varno upravljanje ladje;
give official notice to the master of the ship to put an end to the threat to the environment or maritime safety;
na poveljnika ladje naslovi uradni opomin, naj se preneha z grožnjo okolju ali pomorski varnosti;
send an evaluation team aboard the ship to assess the degree of risk, help the master to remedy the situation and keep the competent coastal station informed thereof;
pošlje na ladjo ocenjevalno skupino, ki oceni stopnjo tveganja, pomaga poveljniku, da uredi razmere, in o tem sproti obvešča pristojno obalno postajo;
instruct the master to put in at a place of refuge in the event of imminent peril, or cause the ship to be piloted or towed.
od poveljnika zahteva, da v primeru neposredne nevarnosti vpluje v pribežališče ali zahteva pilotažo ali vleko ladje.
In the case of a ship which is towed under a towage or salvage agreement, the measures taken by the competent authority of a Member State under points (a) and (d) may be also addressed to the assistance, salvage and towage companies involved.’
Če se vleka ladje izvede na podlagi sporazuma o vleki ali reševanju, lahko ukrepi, ki jih v skladu s točkama (a) in (d) sprejme pristojni organ države članice, veljajo tudi za vključena podjetja za pomoč, reševanje in vleko.“
Resolution MSC.150(77) of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has been revoked and replaced by IMO Resolution MSC.286(86) with effect from 1 July 2009.
Resolucija MSC.150(77) Mednarodne pomorske organizacije (IMO) je bila preklicana, nadomestila pa jo je resolucija MSC.286(86) IMO z učinkom od 1. julija 2009.
Therefore Article 12 of Directive 2002/59/EC referring to the revoked IMO Resolution should also be updated accordingly.
Zato je treba posodobiti tudi člen 12 Direktive 2002/59/ES, ki se nanaša na preklicano resolucijo IMO.
Council Directive 2011/16/EU
Direktiva Sveta 2011/16/EU
on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC
o upravnem sodelovanju na področju obdavčevanja in razveljavitvi Direktive 77/799/EGS
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 113 and 115 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti členov 113 in 115 Pogodbe,
Acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure,
v skladu s posebnim zakonodajnim postopkom
The Member States’ need for mutual assistance in the field of taxation is growing rapidly in a globalised era.
Potreba držav članic po medsebojni pomoči na področju obdavčevanja v obdobju globalizacije hitro narašča.
There is a tremendous development of the mobility of taxpayers, of the number of cross-border transactions and of the internationalisation of financial instruments, which makes it difficult for Member States to assess taxes due properly.
Mobilnost davčnih zavezancev, število čezmejnih transakcij in internacionalizacija finančnih instrumentov se zelo hitro povečujejo, zaradi česar imajo države članice težave pri pravilni odmeri davkov.
This increasing difficulty affects the functioning of taxation systems and entails double taxation, which itself incites tax fraud and tax evasion, while the powers of controls remain at national level.
Te vse večje težave vplivajo na delovanje sistemov obdavčevanja in povzročajo dvojno obdavčenje, ki spodbuja davčne goljufije in davčne utaje, medtem ko se nadzor še naprej izvaja le na nacionalni ravni.
It thus jeopardises the functioning of the internal market.
Tako je ogroženo delovanje notranjega trga.
Therefore, a single Member State cannot manage its internal taxation system, especially as regards direct taxation, without receiving information from other Member States.
Zato posamezna država članica brez prejemanja informacij iz drugih držav članic ne more upravljati svojega notranjega sistema obdavčevanja, zlasti v zvezi z neposrednim obdavčevanjem.
In order to overcome the negative effects of this phenomenon, it is indispensable to develop new administrative cooperation between the Member States’ tax administrations.
Za premagovanje negativnih učinkov tega pojava je nujno treba vzpostaviti novo upravno sodelovanje med davčnimi upravami držav članic.
There is a need for instruments likely to create confidence between Member States, by setting up the same rules, obligations and rights for all Member States.
Oblikovati je treba instrumente, ki bodo verjetno vzpostavili zaupanje med državami članicami, tako da se določijo enaka pravila, obveznosti in pravice za vse države članice.
Therefore, a completely new approach should be taken by creating a new text to give Member States the power to efficiently cooperate at international level to overcome the negative effects of an ever-increasing globalisation on the internal market.
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti popolnoma nov pristop s pripravo novega besedila, da se državam članicam omogoči učinkovito sodelovanje na mednarodni ravni za premagovanje negativnih učinkov vse večje globalizacije na notranji trg.
In such a context, the existing Council Directive 77/799/EEC of 19 December 1977 concerning mutual assistance by the competent authorities of the Member States in the field of direct taxation and taxation of insurance premiums [3] no longer provides for appropriate measures.
V takih okoliščinah obstoječa Direktiva Sveta 77/799/EGS z dne 19. decembra 1977 o medsebojni pomoči pristojnih organov držav članic na področju neposrednega obdavčevanja in obdavčevanja zavarovalnih premij [3] ne vsebuje več ustreznih ukrepov.
Its deep weaknesses have been looked into by the Ad hoc Council Working Party on Tax Fraud in its report of 22 May 2000 and more recently by the Commission Communication on Preventing and Combating Corporate and Financial Malpractice of 27 September 2004 and the Commission Communication concerning the need to develop a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud of 31 May 2006.
Njene velike pomanjkljivosti so bile preučene v poročilu ad hoc delovne skupine Sveta za davčne goljufije z dne 22. maja 2000 ter nedavno v sporočilu Komisije o preprečevanju in boju proti korporacijski in finančni zlorabi z dne 27. septembra 2004 in v sporočilu Komisije o potrebi po razvoju usklajene strategije za izboljšanje boja proti davčnim goljufijam z dne 31. maja 2006.
Directive 77/799/EEC, even with its later amendments, was designed in a different context to current internal market requirements and is no longer able to meet the new requirements of administrative cooperation.
Direktiva 77/799/EGS, celo s poznejšimi spremembami, je bila pripravljena v okoliščinah, ki se razlikujejo od sedanjih zahtev notranjega trga in ne more več izpolnjevati novih zahtev upravnega sodelovanja.
Due to the number and the importance of adaptations to be made to Directive 77/799/EEC, a mere amendment thereof would not be sufficient to fulfil the objectives described above.
Zaradi števila in pomembnosti prilagoditev, ki so potrebne v Direktivi 77/799/ES, zgolj spreminjanje Direktive ne bi zadostovalo za izpolnitev zgoraj opisanih ciljev.
Directive 77/799/EEC should therefore be repealed and replaced by a new legal instrument.
Direktivo 77/799/EGS bi zato bilo treba razveljaviti in jo nadomestiti z novim pravnim instrumentom.
That instrument should apply to direct taxes and indirect taxes that are not yet covered by other Union legislation.
Ta instrument bi se moral uporabljati za neposredne davke in posredne davke, ki še niso zajeti v drugi zakonodaji Unije.
To this end, this new Directive is considered to be the proper instrument in terms of effective administrative cooperation.
Zato se ta nova direktiva šteje za primeren instrument v smislu učinkovitega upravnega sodelovanja.
This Directive builds on the achievements of Directive 77/799/EEC but provides for clearer and more precise rules governing administrative cooperation between Member States where necessary, in order to establish, especially as regards the exchange of information, a wider scope of administrative cooperation between Member States.
Ta direktiva nadgrajuje dosežke Direktive 77/799/EGS, vendar določa jasnejša in natančnejša pravila, ki urejajo upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami, ko je to potrebno, da bi tako predvsem glede izmenjave informacij dosegli širši obseg upravnega sodelovanja med državami članicami.
Clearer rules should also make it possible in particular to cover all legal and natural persons in the Union, taking into account the ever-increasing range of legal arrangements, including not only traditional arrangements such as trusts, foundations and investment funds, but any new instrument which may be set up by taxpayers in the Member States.
Poleg tega bi morala jasnejša pravila zlasti omogočiti, da bi bile zajete vse fizične in pravne osebe v Uniji, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati vedno večje število pravnih ureditev, ne le vključno s tradicionalnimi ureditvami, kot so skladi, fundacije in investicijski skladi, temveč tudi nove instrumente, ki jih lahko vzpostavijo davkoplačevalci v državah članicah.
There should be more direct contact between Member States’ local or national offices in charge of administrative cooperation, with communication between central liaison offices being the rule.
Potreben bi bil bolj neposreden stik med lokalnimi ali nacionalnimi uradi držav članic, ki so odgovorni za upravno sodelovanje, praviloma pa bi morali med seboj komunicirati centralni uradi za zvezo.
The lack of direct contacts leads to inefficiency, under-use of the arrangements for administrative cooperation and delays in communication.
Pomanjkanje neposrednih stikov povzroča neučinkovitost, premajhno uporabo postopkov upravnega sodelovanja in zamude pri sporočanju.
Provision should therefore be made to bring about more direct contacts between services with a view to making cooperation more efficient and faster.
Zato bi bilo treba zaradi učinkovitejšega in hitrejšega sodelovanja predvideti bolj neposredne stike med službami.
The assignment of competences to the liaison departments should be deferred to the national provisions of each Member State.
Dodelitev pristojnosti službam za zvezo bi morala biti urejena z nacionalnimi določbami posamezne države članice.
Member States should exchange information concerning particular cases where requested by another Member State and should make the necessary enquiries to obtain such information.
Države članice bi si morale izmenjati informacije o konkretnih primerih, kadar za to zaprosi druga država članica, in opraviti potrebne preiskave za pridobitev takih informacij.
The standard of ‘foreseeable relevance’ is intended to provide for exchange of information in tax matters to the widest possible extent and, at the same time, to clarify that Member States are not at liberty to engage in ‘fishing expeditions’ or to request information that is unlikely to be relevant to the tax affairs of a given taxpayer.
Namen standarda „verjetne primernosti“ je zagotoviti izmenjavo podatkov o davčnih zadevah v čim večjem obsegu, hkrati pa razjasniti, da se države članice ne morejo lotiti „iskanj na slepo“ ali zaprositi za informacije, ki najverjetneje niso pomembne za davčne zadeve določenega davkoplačevalca.
While Article 20 of this Directive contains procedural requirements, those provisions need to be interpreted liberally in order not to frustrate the effective exchange of information.
Čeprav člen 20 te direktive vsebuje postopkovne zahteve, pa je treba te določbe razlagati široko, da ne bi ovirali dejanske izmenjave informacij.
It is recognised that the mandatory automatic exchange of information without preconditions is the most effective means of enhancing the correct assessment of taxes in cross-border situations and of fighting fraud.
Splošno je priznano, da je nepogojevana obvezna avtomatična izmenjava podatkov najučinkovitejši način za krepitev pravilne odmere davkov v čezmejnih primerih in za boj proti goljufijam.
To that end, a step-by-step approach should therefore be followed starting with the automatic exchange of available information on five categories and reviewing the relevant provisions after a report by the Commission.
V ta namen bi bilo treba zato uporabiti postopen pristop, začenši z avtomatično izmenjavo razpoložljivih informacij v zvezi s petimi kategorijami in s pregledom ustreznih določb po poročilu Komisije.
The spontaneous exchange of information between Member States should also be strengthened and encouraged.
Prav tako bi bilo treba okrepiti in spodbujati izmenjavo podatkov med državami članicami na lastno pobudo.
Time limits for the provision of information under this Directive should be laid down in order to ensure that the information exchange is timely and thus effective.
Treba bi bilo določiti rok za posredovanje informacij v skladu s to direktivo, da bi tako omogočili pravočasno in učinkovito izmenjavo informacij.
It is important that officials of the tax administration of one Member State are allowed to be present in the territory of another Member State.
Pomembno je, da se uradnikom davčne uprave ene države članice dovoli navzočnost na ozemlju druge države članice.
Since the tax situation of one or more persons liable to tax established in several Member States is often of common or complementary interest, it should be made possible for simultaneous controls to be carried out on such persons by two or more Member States, by mutual agreement and on a voluntary basis.
Ker je davčni položaj ene ali več oseb, zavezanih za davek, ki imajo sedež v več državah članicah, pogosto v skupnem ali dopolnilnem interesu, bi bilo treba omogočiti opravljanje sočasnih pregledov takšnih oseb s strani dveh ali več držav članic na podlagi medsebojnega dogovora in na prostovoljni osnovi.
In view of the legal requirement in certain Member States that a taxpayer be notified of decisions and instruments concerning his tax liability and of the ensuing difficulties for the tax authorities, including cases where the taxpayer has relocated to another Member State, it is desirable that, in such circumstances, the tax authorities should be able to call upon the cooperation of the competent authorities of the Member State to which the taxpayer has relocated.
Glede na zakonsko zahtevo v nekaterih državah članicah, da je treba davčnega zavezanca uradno obvestiti o sklepih in aktih v zvezi z njegovo davčno obveznostjo, ter glede na težave, ki iz tega izhajajo za davčne organe, vključno s primeri preselitve davčnega zavezanca v drugo državo članico, je zaželeno, da lahko davčni organi v takšnih okoliščinah zaprosijo za sodelovanje pristojne organe države članice, v katero se je davčni zavezanec preselil.
Feedback on information sent will encourage administrative cooperation between Member States.
Povratne informacije o poslanih podatkih bodo spodbudile upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami.
Collaboration between the Member States and the Commission is necessary for the permanent study of cooperation procedures and the sharing of experience and best practices in the fields considered.
Sodelovanje med državami članicami in Komisijo je potrebno za trajno preučevanje postopkov sodelovanja ter izmenjavo izkušenj in najboljših praks na obravnavanih področjih.
It is important for the efficiency of administrative cooperation that information and documents obtained under this Directive could, subject to the restrictions laid down in this Directive, be used by the Member State that received them also for other purposes.
Za učinkovitost upravnega sodelovanja je pomembno, da bi se lahko informacije in dokumenti, pridobljeni na podlagi te direktive, skladno z omejitvami, ki so določene v tej direktivi, država članica, ki jih prejme, uporablja tudi za druge namene.
It is also important that Member States could transmit that information to a third country, under certain conditions.
Prav tako je pomembno, da bi lahko države članice pod določenimi pogoji te informacije posredovale tretji državi.
The situations in which a requested Member State may refuse to provide information should be clearly defined and limited, taking into account certain private interests which should be protected as well as the public interest.
Primere, v katerih lahko zaprošena država članica zavrne posredovanje informacij, bi bilo treba jasno opredeliti in omejiti, pri tem pa poleg javnega interesa upoštevati tudi določene zasebne interese, ki bi jih bilo treba zaščititi.
However, a Member State should not refuse to transmit information because it has no domestic interest or because the information is held by a bank, other financial institution, nominee or person acting in an agency or fiduciary capacity or because it relates to ownership interests in a person.
Vendar država članica ne bi smela zavrniti predložitve informacij zato, ker za takšne informacije nima interesa ali ker informacije hrani banka, druga finančna institucija, pooblaščenec ali oseba, ki deluje kot zastopnik ali fiduciar, ali ker zadevajo lastniško udeležbo osebe.