natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Up until now, except in respect of Hunosa, analysis of the aid was carried out at undertaking level and underground coal workings were calculated together with opencast workings.
Do sedaj, razen v primeru podjetja Hunosa, je bila analiza pomoči opravljena na ravni podjetja in podzemna premogovna dela so se računala skupaj z deli na površini.
Aid for the reduction of activity
Pomoč za zmanjševanje dejavnosti
The Spanish authorities explained that, as may be seen from the report, all the undertakings which in 2002 were classified as being in receipt of aid under Article 4 of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC are currently classified as undertakings receiving aid under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002.
Španske oblasti so pojasnile, da so, kot je lahko razvidno iz poročila, vsa podjetja, ki so bila leta 2002 razvrščena kot prejemniki pomoči po členu 4 Odločbe št. 3632/93/ESPJ, trenutno razvrščena kot podjetja, ki prejemajo pomoč po členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002.
Degression of aid
Zmanjševanje pomoči
The Spanish authorities have explained that, until the end of 2005, aid reduction should be global and at a rate of 4 % per year.
Španske oblasti so pojasnile, da mora biti zmanjševanje pomoči do konca leta 2005 globalno, in sicer 4 % letno.
The Spanish authorities have informed the Commission that Order ECO/2731/2003 has been amended in order to bring it into line with the requirements of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002.
Španske oblasti so obvestile Komisijo, da je bila Odredba ECO/2731/2003 spremenjena, da bi se uskladila z zahtevami člena 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002.
The order will only apply to production units which actually close before 31 December 2005 and it will not be applied to closure programmes which expire after that date.
Odredba se bo uporabljala zgolj za proizvodne enote, ki se dejansko zaprejo pred 31. decembrom 2005, ne bo pa se uporabljala za programe za zaprtje, ki se iztečejo po tem datumu.
Furthermore, the compensation of EUR 13 per 1000 therms for coal contracts cancelled as a result of closure of the production unit which supplied the fuel has been fixed as the maximum aid to provide financial support for the types of cost contained in Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002.
Poleg tega je nadomestilo 13 EUR na 1000 termalnih enot za premogovne pogodbe, razveljavljene kot posledica zaprtja proizvodne enote, ki je dobavljala gorivo, določeno kot največja pomoč za zagotavljanje finančne podpore vrstam stroškov, navedenim v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 1407/2002.
Only duly substantiated actual costs of closure will be paid for.
Povrnjeni bodo zgolj ustrezno utemeljeni dejanski stroški zaprtja.
Previous Commission decisions
Prejšnje odločbe Komisije
Closures until 31 December 2005
Zaprtja do 31. decembra 2005
Production units which received aid to cover exceptional costs of closure
Proizvodne enote, ki so prejele pomoč za kritje izrednih stroškov zaprtja
As stated in the 2003, 2004 and 2005 aid reports, the aid granted in 2003 to Antracitas de Gillón, ENCASUR, ENDESA and PMC (before closure in 2004) and that planned for 2004 and 2005 is aid for reduction of activity.
Kot je navedeno v poročilih o pomoči za leta 2003, 2004 in 2005, je pomoč, dodeljena leta 2003 proizvodnim enotam Antracitas de Gillón, Encasur, Endesa in PMC (pred zaprtjem leta 2004) in načrtovana za leti 2004 in 2005, pomoč za zmanjševanje dejavnosti.
The aid granted to provide financial support for exceptional closure costs between 1998 and 2002 to ENDESA and ENCASUR was justified at the time as aid to cover differences between general early retirement payments and the 100 % paid by those undertakings.
Pomoč, dodeljena med letoma 1998 in 2002 za zagotavljanje finančne podpore za izredne stroške zaprtja podjetjema Endesa in Encasur, je bila takrat utemeljena kot pomoč za kritje razlik med plačili za splošno predčasno upokojitev in 100 %, ki sta jih plačali navedeni podjetji.
The Spanish authorities provided letters of commitment to confirm the closure of the production units committed for closure by the undertakings at the end of 2005.
Španske oblasti so zagotovile dopise o zavezi, ki potrjujejo zaprtje proizvodnih enot do konca leta 2005, h kateremu so se zavezala podjetja.
The Hunosa plan
Načrt za Hunoso
Observations on the HUNOSA restructuring effort
Ugotovitve glede prizadevanj podjetja HUNOSA za prestrukturiranje
Aid granted to HUNOSA in 2003-2005
Pomoč, dodeljena podjetju HUNOSA v obdobju 2003–2005
The Spanish authorities explained that the volume of restructuring aid will be kept strictly within the limits of the costs arising from the outsourcing of social obligations and provided the appropriate explanations.
Španske oblasti so pojasnile, da bo obseg pomoči za prestrukturiranje ostal strogo v mejah stroškov, ki izhajajo iz zunanjega izvajanja družbenih obveznosti, in zagotovile ustrezna pojasnila.
The apparent contradiction between the significant effort made in reduction of costs and the less significant degression in production aid basically arose from changes in revenues as a result of international prices for imported coal and the US dollar/euro exchange rate.
Očitno nasprotje med znatnim prizadevanjem za zmanjšanje stroškov in manj znatnim zmanjšanjem proizvodne pomoči izhaja predvsem iz sprememb v prihodkih kot posledica mednarodnih cen za uvožen premog in menjalnega tečaja ameriški dolar/euro.
The Spanish authorities provided detailed information with regard to the calculations of the revenues and explained why the revenues are in general lower than the international price of imported coal.
Španske oblasti so zagotovile podrobne informacije v zvezi z izračuni prihodkov in pojasnile, zakaj so prihodki v splošnem nižji kot mednarodna cena uvoženega premoga.
The Spanish authorities also provided detailed explanations on aid to cover exceptional costs arising from the restructuring process.
V zvezi s pomočjo za kritje izrednih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz procesa prestrukturiranja, so španske oblasti prav tako zagotovile podrobna pojasnila.
Information on the recruitment of specialist technical staff
Informacije o zaposlovanju strokovnega tehničnega osebja
The Spanish authorities pointed out that hiring of such staff is strictly subject to the need to cover essential posts, particularly for safety reasons.
Španske oblasti so poudarile, da je zaposlovanje osebja v vseh primerih v skladu s potrebo po zasedbi pomembnih delovnih mest, zlasti iz varnostnih razlogov.
However, it should be noted that so far, during the first 2 years of implementation of the plan, no new recruitment has taken place.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da zaenkrat v prvih dveh letih izvajanja načrta ni prišlo do novih zaposlitev.
Nevertheless the Spanish authorities have, as a precautionary measure, put forward as a maximum estimated number of such recruitments no more than 100 employees.
Španske oblasti so vseeno kot previdnostni ukrep predlagale ocenjeno število takšnih zaposlitev, in sicer največ 100 uslužbencev.
Application of Article 87(1) of the Treaty
Uporaba člena 87(1) Pogodbe
To determine whether the scheme’s measures constitute aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty, it must be determined whether the measures are granted by Member States or through state resources, whether they favour certain undertakings, whether they distort or threaten to distort competition and whether they are liable to affect trade between Member States.
Za ugotovitev, ali ukrepi programa pomenijo pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe, je treba ugotoviti, ali pomoč dodeljuje država članica ali gre za pomoč iz državnih sredstev, ali ukrepi dajejo prednost določenim podjetjem, ali izkrivljajo ali bi lahko izkrivljali konkurenco in ali lahko vplivajo na trgovino med državami članicami.
The first condition of Article 87 refers to aid granted by States or through state resources.
Prvi pogoj člena 87 se nanaša na pomoč, ki jo dodeljujejo države, ali pomoč iz državnih sredstev.
In this particular case, the existence of state resources is demonstrated by the fact that the measure is effectively financed by the public budget of the State and to a lesser extent, by SEPI, a publicly owned company fully controlled by the State.
V zadevnem primeru obstoj državnih sredstev potrjuje dejstvo, da je ukrep učinkovito financiran iz javnega proračuna države, v manjši meri pa ga financira SEPI, podjetje v javni lasti pod izključnim nadzorom države.
The second condition of Article 87(1) relates to the possibility of the measures favouring specific beneficiaries.
Drugi pogoj člena 87(1) se nanaša na možnost, da ukrep daje prednost posebnim upravičencem.
It needs to be determined, firstly, whether the beneficiary companies derive an economic benefit and, secondly, whether this benefit is granted to a specific type of company.
Kot prvo je treba ugotoviti, ali imajo upravičena podjetja gospodarsko korist, kot drugo pa, ali je ta korist zagotovljena posebnemu tipu podjetja.
The aid clearly provides economic benefits for coalmining companies in that there is a direct subsidisation which covers current expenses that these companies would normally have to bear themselves.
Pomoč nedvomno zagotavlja gospodarske koristi premogovniškim podjetjem, saj gre za neposredno subvencioniranje, ki krije tekoče izdatke, ki bi jih morala ta podjetja sicer kriti sama.
These expenses consist of the difference between the production costs and the foreseeable revenue plus the costs arising from the restructuring, and the coalmining companies benefit from the fact that they are partly compensated for these costs.
Te izdatke sestavljajo razlika med proizvodnimi stroški ter predvidenimi prihodki in stroški, ki izhajajo iz prestrukturiranja, premogovniška podjetja pa imajo koristi v tem, da za te stroške prejemajo delna nadomestila.
Moreover, the measures in question are aimed solely at coalmining companies in Spain.
Poleg tega so zadevni ukrepi usmerjeni izključno v premogovniška podjetja v Španiji.
They therefore favour certain companies over their competitors, i.e. they are selective.
Torej dajejo prednost nekaterim podjetjem pred njihovimi konkurenti, tj. so selektivni.
Pursuant to the third and fourth conditions of Article 87(1), the aid must not distort or threaten to distort competition or affect or be liable to affect trade between Member States.
V skladu s tretjim in četrtim pogojem člena 87(1) pomoč ne sme izkrivljati ali predstavljati grožnje za izkrivljanje konkurence ali vplivati ali predstavljati možnosti za vpliv na trgovino med državami članicami.
In the case in hand, the measures do threaten to distort competition as they reinforce the financial position and scope for action of the beneficiary companies compared with their non-beneficiary competitors.
V zadevnem primeru ukrepi predstavljajo grožnjo za izkrivljanje konkurence, saj krepijo finančni položaj in obseg dejavnosti upravičenih podjetij v primerjavi z neupravičenimi konkurenti.
Even if intra-Community trade in coal is very limited and the companies in question do not export, companies established in other Member States have less scope for exporting their products to the Spanish market.
Čeprav je trgovina s premogom znotraj Skupnosti zelo omejena in zadevna podjetja ne izvažajo, imajo podjetja, ustanovljena v drugih državah članicah, manj možnosti za izvoz svojih proizvodov na španski trg.
For these reasons, the measures in question fall within the scope of Article 87(1) of the Treaty and may be considered compatible with the common market only if they meet the conditions for qualifying for one of the derogations provided for in the Treaty.
Iz teh razlogov zadevni ukrepi sodijo v področje uporabe člena 87(1) Pogodbe in se jih lahko spozna za združljive s skupnim trgom le, če so upravičeni do enega od odstopanj, predvidenih v Pogodbi.
Application of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002
Uporaba Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002
Given that the ECSC Treaty and Decision No 3632/1993/ECSC both expired on 23 July 2002 and having regard to Article 87(3)(e) of the Treaty, the compatibility of the notified measures has to be assessed on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002.
Glede na to, da sta tako Pogodba ESPJ kot tudi Odločba št. 3632/1993/ESPJ 23. julija 2002 potekli, in ob upoštevanju člena 87(3)(e) Pogodbe, je treba združljivost priglašenih ukrepov oceniti na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002.
Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002 lays down the rules for the granting of State aid to the coal industry with the aim of contributing to the restructuring of the industry.
Uredba (ES) št. 1407/2002 določa predpise za dodeljevanje državne pomoči za premogovništvo, ki naj prispeva k prestrukturiranju te panoge.
These rules take account of the social and regional aspects of the sector’s restructuring and the need for maintaining a minimum quantity of coal production to guarantee access to coal reserves.
Ti predpisi upoštevajo socialne in regionalne vidike prestrukturiranja sektorja in potrebo po ohranjanju najmanjše količine proizvodnje premoga, ki zagotavlja dostop do zalog.
The process of restructuring of the coal industry must be continued, given the competitive imbalance between Community coal and imported coal.
Proces prestrukturiranja premogovništva je treba zaradi konkurenčnega neravnovesja med premogom Skupnosti in uvoženim premogom nadaljevati.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, the production of subsidised coal must be limited to what is strictly necessary to make an effective contribution to the objective of security of supply of energy.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti mora biti proizvodnja subvencioniranega premoga omejena na to, kar je neizogibno potrebno za učinkovit prispevek k uresničevanju varnosti oskrbe z energijo.
In this context the Commission refers also to its Communication ‘A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development’, also known as the Gothenburg Sustainable Development Strategy, which aims to ‘limit climate change and increase the use of clean energy’ [14].
V tej zvezi se Komisija sklicuje tudi na svoje sporočilo „Trajnostni razvoj Evrope za boljši svet: Strategija trajnostnega razvoja Evropske unije“, imenovana tudi göteborška strategija trajnostnega razvoja, katere cilj je „omejiti podnebne spremembe in povečati uporabo čiste energije.“ [14].
Member States may, in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002, grant aid for the reduction of activity.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002 dodelijo pomoč za zmanjševanje dejavnosti.
One of the conditions that have to be fulfilled is that the operation of the production units concerned shall form part of a closure plan.
Eden od pogojev, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni, je, da je obratovanje zadevnih proizvodnih enot sestavni del načrta za zaprtje.
Member States may, in accordance with Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002, grant production aid to an undertaking, intended specifically for production units or to a group of production units.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 5(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002 podjetju dodelijo proizvodno pomoč, ki je posebej namenjena proizvodnim enotam ali skupini proizvodnih enot.
One of the conditions that have to be fulfilled is that the operation of the production units concerned or of the group of the group of production units in the same undertaking forms part of a plan for accessing coal reserves.
Eden od pogojev, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni, je, da je obratovanje zadevnih proizvodnih enot ali skupine proizvodnih enot v istem podjetju sestavni del načrta za dostop do zalog premoga.
Member States may, in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002, grant aid to cover exceptional costs arising from the rationalisation and restructuring of the coal industry that are not related to current production, provided that the amount paid does not exceed such costs.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002 dodelijo pomoč za kritje izrednih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz racionalizacije in prestrukturiranja premogovništva, a niso povezani s sedanjo proizvodnjo, če višina izplačanega zneska ne presega teh stroškov.
The categories of costs resulting from the rationalisation and restructuring of the coal industry are defined in the Annex to the Regulation.
Kategorije stroškov kot posledica racionalizacije in prestrukturiranja premogovništva so opredeljene v Prilogi k Uredbi.
In its letter of 30 March 2004 the Commission expressed its doubts as to whether the notified restructuring plan was in conformity with the conditions and criteria set out in Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002 and whether it complied with the objectives of this Regulation.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 30. marca 2004 izrazila dvom, ali je priglašen načrt za prestrukturiranje v skladu s pogoji in merili, določenimi v Uredbi (ES) št. 1407/2002, in ali ustreza ciljem te uredbe.
The Commission considered that it needed a more detailed plan.
Komisija je menila, da je potreben podrobnejši načrt.
Following this letter Spain provided the Commission on several occasions with detailed information concerning the restructuring plan.
Španija je po tem dopisu Komisiji večkrat predložila podrobne informacije glede načrta za prestrukturiranje.
On the basis of this new information the Commission will hereinafter assess the restructuring plan and the aid for the years 2003, 2004 and 2005 granted on the basis of the restructuring plan.
Komisija bo na podlagi teh novih informacij v nadaljevanju ocenila načrt za prestrukturiranje in pomoč za leta 2003, 2004 in 2005, dodeljeno na podlagi načrta za prestrukturiranje.
In its letter of 30 March 2004 the Commission considered that the Spanish authorities had not clearly stated that the conditions laid down in previous Commission decisions, in particular Decision 2002/826/ECSC, which have been taken on the basis of the ECSC Treaty, would be respected.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 30. marca 2004 menila, da španske oblasti niso jasno navedle, da bodo upoštevani pogoji, določeni v prejšnjih odločbah Komisije, sprejetih na podlagi Pogodbe ESPJ, zlasti Odločbi 2002/826/ESPJ.
This Decision authorises the granting of aid on condition that the production units in question are included in a closure plan and that by 2005 they reduce the production capacity by 1660000 tonnes.
V Odločbi je dodelitev pomoči odobrena pod pogojem, da so zadevne proizvodne enote vključene v načrtu za zaprtje in da do leta 2005 zmanjšajo proizvodno zmogljivost za 1660000 ton.
Spain has to respect these conditions.
Španija mora upoštevati te pogoje.
The fact that the ECSC Treaty has expired and Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002 has entered into force does not affect commitments made in the past.
Dejstvo, da je Pogodba ESPJ potekla in da je stopila v veljavo Uredba (ES) št. 1407/2002, ne vpliva na zaveze iz preteklosti.
These commitments have to be fully respected and the Commission has to ensure the fulfilment of the conditions laid down in decisions taken on the basis of the ECSC Treaty.
Te zaveze je treba upoštevati v celoti in Komisija mora zagotoviti izpolnitev pogojev, določenih v odločbah, sprejetih na podlagi Pogodbe ESPJ.
The previous closure/activity-reduction plan based on Decision No 3632/93/ECSC was approved by Decision 2002/826/ECSC.
Prejšnji načrt za zaprtje/zmanjševanje dejavnosti, ki temelji na Odločbi št. 3632/93/ESPJ, je bil odobren z Odločbo 2002/826/ESPJ.
On several occasions, in several letters to the Commission, the Spanish authorities have accepted that past commitments must be fully respected and have explicitly confirmed that the decisions on the closure of the production units listed in paragraph 18 of Decision 2002/826/ECSC will be implemented in accordance with the rules in force.
Španske oblasti so se večkrat in pisno v več dopisih Komisiji strinjale, da je treba obveznosti iz preteklosti upoštevati v celoti, in so izrecno potrdile, da bodo odločitve o zaprtju proizvodnih enot, naštetih v uvodni izjavi 18 Odločbe 2002/826/ESPJ, izvršene v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi.
The Commission considers that the production units that have reduced their production capacity are the same as those already included in the closure/activity-reduction plan based on Decision No 3632/93/ECSC.
Komisija je mnenja, da so proizvodne enote, ki so zmanjšale svojo proizvodno zmogljivost, proizvodne enote, ki so že bile vključene v načrtu za zaprtje/zmanjševanje dejavnosti, ki temelji na Odločbi št. 3632/93/ESPJ.
These are the production units which are mentioned in paragraph 18 of Decision 2002/826/ESCS.
To so proizvodne enote, ki so navedene v uvodni izjavi 18 Odločbe 2002/826/ESPJ.
Following several requests by the Commission, the underground units of ENDESA and ENCASUR and the production unit of Antracitas de Gillon were closed down.
Proizvodni enoti podzemnega rudarjenja Endesa in Encasur ter proizvodna enota Antracitas de Gillon so se po več zahtevah Komisije zaprle.
On the basis of the information provided by Spain, the Commission has verified that the aid granted to these companies under Article 5 of Decision No 3632/93/ECSC in order to cover the exceptional costs of closure of these production units does not exceed the costs.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki ji jih je sporočila Španija, potrdila, da pomoč, dodeljena tem podjetjem po členu 5 Odločbe št. 3632/93/ESPJ za kritje izrednih stroškov zaprtja teh proizvodnih enot, ne presega stroškov.
Since the required reduction of production capacity has been achieved by the production units listed in paragraph 18 of Decision 2002/826/ECSC and since the production units that were supposed to close down according to that Decision, have finally been closed down, the Commission concludes that Spain has respected the previous Commission decisions.
Ker so proizvodne enote, naštete v uvodni izjavi 18 Odločbe 2002/826/ESPJ, dosegle potrebno zmanjšanje proizvodne zmogljivosti in so se proizvodne enote, ki naj bi se v skladu z navedeno odločbo zaprle, na koncu zaprle, Komisija sklepa, da je Španija upoštevala prejšnje odločbe Komisije.
In its letter of 30 March 2004 the Commission stated that the Spanish authorities had notified the overall amount of operating aid to be granted.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 30. marca 2004 navedla, da so španske oblasti priglasile skupni znesek pomoči za tekoče poslovanje, ki naj bi se dodelil.
However, the Spanish authorities have neither notified the total amount of aid to the reduction of activity as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002 nor the total amount of aid for accessing coal reserves as referred to in Article 5(3) of that Regulation.
Vendar španske oblasti niso priglasile niti skupnega zneska pomoči za zmanjševanje dejavnosti, kot je navedena v členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1407/2002, niti skupnega zneska pomoči za dostop do zalog premoga, kot je navedena v členu 5(3) navedene uredbe.
In addition the Spanish authorities did not shed any light on the criteria to be fulfilled by the production units in order to be able to apply for aid.
Prav tako španske oblasti niso pojasnile, kakšna merila morajo izpolnjevati proizvodne enote, da lahko zaprosijo za pomoč.
Another of the Commission’s doubts concerned the fact that the Spanish authorities had not defined the total production capacity that should be closed neither by 31 December 2005 or by 31 December 2007 as a result of the closure plan, as required by Articles 4(a) and 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1407/2002 as one of the conditions to be fulfilled in order to qualify for aid to the reduction of activity.
Komisija je izrazila dvom tudi zaradi dejstva, da španske oblasti niso opredelile celotne proizvodne zmogljivosti, ki jo je treba zapreti pred 31. decembrom 2005 ali 31. decembrom 2007 kot posledica načrta za zaprtje, ki je v členih 4(a) in 9(4) Uredbe št. 1407/2002 določen kot eden od pogojev, ki jih je treba izpolnjevati za upravičenost do pomoči za zmanjševanje dejavnosti.
The estimated amount of aid can only be granted if the total reduction of capacity is notified.
Ocenjen znesek pomoči je mogoče dodeliti le, če je priglašeno celotno zmanjšanje zmogljivosti.