natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to publicly available information, the biofuel power plant has been operational since 2009 [7].
Glede na javno dostopne informacije elektrarna na biogorivo obratuje od leta 2009 [7].
The Commission doubted whether the aid would have the incentive effect required by paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines: ‘In the case of ad hoc aid, the competent authority must have issued a letter of intent, conditional on Commission approval of the measure, to award aid before work starts on the project’. The document the Italian authorities referred to as the letter of intent — the Programme Agreement of 15 July 2005 — did not seem to fulfil these conditions: it did not grant aid for the project, nor did it mention the recipient, the project or the amount of the aid.
Komisija je dvomila, da bo imela pomoč spodbujevalni učinek, ki se zahteva v odstavku 38 smernic iz leta 2007: „V primeru ad hoc pomoči mora pristojni organ pred začetkom dela na projektu izdati pismo o nameri dodelitve pomoči pogojeno z odobritvijo pomoči s strani Komisije.“ Zdelo se je, da dokument, ki ga italijanski organi navajajo kot pismo o nameri – to je sporazum o programu z dne 15. julija 2005 –, ne izpolnjuje teh zahtev: z njim se projektu ne dodeljuje pomoč niti niso v njem navedeni prejemnica, projekt ali znesek pomoči.
The recipient of the aid was formally set up only later, on 20 December 2005.
Prejemnica pomoči je bila uradno ustanovljena šele pozneje, 20. decembra 2005.
According to the information available to the Commission, the project had started in February 2006, with the takeover of the closed thermoelectric power plant, which was the first eligible cost for purposes of the aid measure notified, while the first document that could be considered a letter of intent within the meaning of paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines had been issued by the Region of Campania much later, on 26 October 2007.
V skladu z informacijami, s katerimi je razpolagala Komisija, se je projekt začel izvajati februarja 2006 s prevzemom zaprte termoelektrarne, in to so bili prvi upravičeni stroški za namene priglašenega ukrepa pomoči, prvi dokument, ki bi se lahko obravnaval kot pismo o nameri v smislu odstavka 38 smernic iz leta 2007, pa je dežela Kampanja izdala mnogo pozneje, 26. oktobra 2007.
It was not clear whether the subsequent purchase from NGP of other existing assets — fuel tanks — had taken place ‘under market conditions’, as required by paragraphs 34 and 52 of the 2007 Guidelines.
Ni bilo jasno, ali je poznejši nakup drugih obstoječih sredstev – to je rezervoarjev za gorivo – od družbe NGP potekal „po tržnih pogojih“, kot se zahteva v odstavkih 34 in 52 smernic iz leta 2007.
The Italian authorities had not provided a valuation by an independent expert clearly establishing the market price of the fuel tanks.
Italijanski organi niso predložili nobenega vrednotenja, ki bi ga izvedel neodvisni strokovnjak in v katerem bi bila jasno določena tržna cena teh rezervoarjev za gorivo.
As previously mentioned, the Commission received observations from the recipient of the aid, Fri-El Acerra, on 15 May 2009.
Kot je bilo navedeno že zgoraj, je Komisija 15. maja 2009 prejela pripombe od prejemnice pomoči – družbe Fri-El Acerra.
The Italian authorities commented on those observations by letters of 18 September and of 2 November 2009.
Italijanski organi so pripombe nanje poslali z dopisoma z dne 18. septembra in 2. novembra 2009.
On 1 February 2010, following a further request from the Commission, the Italian authorities supplied the Commission with documents provided by the recipient.
Nato so 1. februarja 2010 na naknadno zahtevo Komisije tej predložili dokumente, ki jih je zagotovila prejemnica.
In order to eliminate any possible doubt that there might be an advantage conferred on NGP, the Fri-El Group took over the remaining 5 % from NGP on 11 December 2008.
Za odpravo vseh morebitnih pomislekov, da se družbi NGP daje prednost, je skupina Fri-El 11. decembra 2008 od družbe NGP prevzela še preostalih 5 %.
Fri-El Acerra takes the view, therefore, that the transitional control by NGP did not reflect a medium- to long-term economic rationale, but was due to the specific mechanism chosen for the transfer of the assets (the closed power plant).
Zato družba Fri-El Acerra meni, da prehodni nadzor, ki ga je imela družba NGP, ni bil izraz srednje- ali dolgoročnih gospodarskih razlogov, ampak je bil posledica posebnega mehanizma, izbranega za prenos sredstev (zaprte elektrarne).
As regards the environmental aspects, finally, Fri-El Acerra refers to the same programming documents of the Region of Campania previously mentioned by the Italian authorities: the 2002 guidelines for sustainable development in the energy sector, which set out the goals of the regional energy policy; the action plan for regional economic development of 2006; and the environmental energy plan of 2008.
Kar nazadnje zadeva okoljske vidike, se družba Fri-El Acerra sklicuje na iste programske dokumente dežele Kampanja, kot so jih navedli že italijanski organi: smernice za trajnostni razvoj v energetskem sektorju iz leta 2002, ki določajo cilje regionalne energetske politike, akcijski načrt za regionalni gospodarski razvoj iz leta 2006 in okoljski energetski načrt iz leta 2008.
Fri-El Acerra considers that all these documents clearly point to the need for a power plant fuelled by renewable sources in the Region of Campania.
Po mnenju družbe Fri-El Acerra ti dokumenti jasno kažejo, da dežela Kampanja potrebuje elektrarno, ki za pogon uporablja obnovljive vire.
In their letter of 18 September 2009, the Italian authorities submit detailed argument regarding the requirement of an incentive effect laid down in paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines.
Italijanski organi v dopisu z dne 18. septembra 2009 navajajo podrobne argumente v zvezi z zahtevo spodbujevalnega učinka, določeno v odstavku 38 smernic iz leta 2007.
In particular, they consider that the 2007 Guidelines do not clearly specify the form of the required letter of intent.
Zlasti menijo, da v smernicah iz leta 2007 ni natančno opredeljena oblika zahtevanega pisma o nameri.
The electricity market has been gradually opened to competition, notably by Directive 96/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity (OJ L 27, 30.1.1997, p. 20), a process that culminated in the full liberalisation of the sector on 1 July 2007 [19].
Trg z električno energijo se je postopoma odpiral konkurenci, zlasti z Direktivo 96/92/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 1996 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo (UL L 27, 30.1.1997, str. 20), in ta postopek je 1. julija 2007 privedel do popolne liberalizacije sektorja [19].
Moreover, there was some competition in this sector in Italy even before the Community legislation [20].
Poleg tega je v Italiji določena stopnja konkurence v tem sektorju obstajala že pred sprejetjem zakonodaje Skupnosti [20].
The Commission observes that the objective of the aid is to promote regional development, and the measure constitutes ad hoc regional aid towards an investment.
Kot ugotavlja Komisija, je cilj pomoči spodbuditi regionalni razvoj, ukrep pa se nanaša na ad hoc regionalno pomoč za naložbo.
The Commission notes that the investment project which the Italian authorities intend to support started in 2006.
Komisija opozarja, da se je naložbeni projekt, ki ga nameravajo podpreti italijanski organi, začel leta 2006.
Rules on the application ratione temporis of the two sets of guidelines are set out in paragraph 105 of the 2007 Guidelines: the 2007 Guidelines are to apply to all regional aid to be granted after 31 December 2006, and the 1998 Guidelines are to apply to all regional aid awarded or to be granted before 2007.
Pravila o časovni uporabi teh dveh dokumentov s smernicami so določena v odstavku 105 smernic iz leta 2007: smernice iz leta 2007 je treba uporabljati za vso regionalno pomoč, dodeljeno po 31. decembru 2006, smernice iz leta 1998 pa za vso regionalno pomoč, ki je bila dodeljena ali odobrena pred letom 2007.
In the present case, the aid was not awarded before 2007, despite the fact that the project started in 2006.
V tej zadevi pomoč ni bila dodeljena pred letom 2007, čeprav se je projekt začel leta 2006.
The first act that can be considered an award of aid to the recipient is the decision of the Region of Campania of 26 October 2007 (see section 5.4.1.5) [22].
Prvi akt, ki ga je mogoče obravnavati v smislu, da se z njim prejemnici dodeljuje pomoč, je odločitev dežele Kampanja z dne 26. oktobra 2007 (glej oddelek 5.4.1.5) [22].
The Italian authorities and the recipient have submitted a number of documents which in their view constitute confirmation in writing within the scope of paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines.
Italijanski organi in prejemnica so predložili številne dokumente, ki po njihovem mnenju pomenijo pisno potrditev v smislu odstavka 38 smernic iz leta 2007.
The Commission will analyse each one of them, in order to verify whether it meets the conditions laid down in paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines.
Komisija bo analizirala vsakega od teh dokumentov, da bi preverila, ali izpolnjujejo pogoje, določene v odstavku 38 smernic iz leta 2007.
Before doing so the Commission must determine the date on which realisation of the project began.
Še prej pa mora opredeliti datum začetka izvajanja projekta.
The Italian authorities have stated that the realisation of the project began in July 2007.
Italijanski organi so navedli, da se je projekt začel izvajati julija 2007.
However, the Commission points out that the purchase of the closed thermoelectric power plant was initiated on 9 February 2006, with the transfer to Fri-El Acerra of the branch of NGP’s business related to the power plant.
Vendar Komisija opozarja, da se je nakup zaprte termoelektrarne začel 9. februarja 2006 s prenosom oddelka družbe NGP, povezanega z elektrarno, na družbo Fri-El Acerra.
The Commission consequently considers that the date on which the realisation of the project began is 9 February 2006.
Komisija zato meni, da se je projekt začel izvajati 9. februarja 2006.
However, the Commission observes that its findings with regard to the incentive effect would remain unchanged if the view were to be taken that the relevant date was 4 August 2006, when Fri-El Acerra placed the order for the supply of the new power plant with Wärtsilä, or even 23-30 July 2007, when Fri-El Acerra started work on the construction of the new biofuel plant.
Vendar opozarja, da bi njene ugotovitve glede spodbujevalnega učinka ostale nespremenjene, če bi zavzela stališče, da je bil zadevni datum 4. avgust 2006, ko je družba Fri-El Acerra naročila dobavo nove elektrarne pri družbi Wärtsilä, ali da je treba kot ta datum upoštevati celo obdobje med 23. in 30. julijem 2007, ko je družba Fri-El Acerra začela gradnjo nove elektrarne na biogorivo.
The Commission has already decided that the incentive effect cannot be transferred from one aid scheme to another, because every scheme is independent and has its own conditions of eligibility [34]; this is all the more true when the national authorities have made reference to the prospect of assistance being provided under a specific scheme that would not in fact allow the granting of aid of an amount such as that at issue here, or to a project of this size.
Komisija je že odločila, da spodbujevalnega učinka ni mogoče prenašati z ene sheme na drugo, ker je vsaka shema neodvisna in ima svoje pogoje za upravičenost [34]; to velja toliko bolj, če so nacionalni organi navedli možnost zagotovitve pomoči po neki shemi, v okviru katere dodelitev pomoči v znesku, kot se obravnava v tej zadevi, ali za tako obsežen projekt dejansko ne bi bila dovoljena.
Finally, Fri-El Acerra started the construction work on 23–30 July 2007.
Nazadnje je v obdobju med 23. in 30. julijem 2007 začela gradbena dela.
Those applications consequently cannot be considered to be a letter of intent within the meaning of paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines, and do not prove that the aid has a real incentive effect.
Zato se navedeni vlogi ne moreta obravnavati kot pismo o nameri v smislu odstavka 38 smernic iz leta 2007 in ne dokazujeta, da ima pomoč resničen spodbujevalni učinek.
The Commission takes the view that the Resolution of the Campania Regional Executive of 26 October 2007 referred to in paragraphs 25, 26, 29 and 68 above (Deliberazione della Giunta Regionale della Regione Campania No 1857) is the first document issued by the Italian authorities which legally binds them to grant the aid to Fri-El Acerra and satisfies the tests of paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines.
Komisija meni, da je resolucija deželnega sveta Kampanje z dne 26. oktobra 2007, navedena v uvodnih izjavah 25, 26, 29 in 68 zgoraj (Deliberazione della Giunta Regionale della Regione Campania št. 1857), prvi dokument, ki so ga izdali italijanski organi, na podlagi katerega so ti organi pravno zavezani dodeliti pomoč družbi Fri-El Acerra, in ki izpolnjuje merila, določena v odstavku 38 smernic iz leta 2007.
This document clearly identifies the investment project (the biofuel power plant) and the amount of aid (maximum EUR 19,5 million), and is conditional on notification and Commission approval.
V dokumentu sta jasno opredeljena naložbeni projekt (elektrarna na biogorivo) in znesek pomoči (največ 19,5 milijona EUR), poleg tega pa je v njem dodelitev pomoči pogojena s priglasitvijo pomoči in odobritvijo Komisije.
The project was notified only on 16 July 2008.
Projekt je bil priglašen šele 16. julija 2008.
A decision of the Region taken in October 2007, containing a conditional commitment to grant aid, cannot be regarded as a decisive factor that provided Fri-El Acerra with an incentive to carry out an investment project that had in fact started with the purchase of the plant in February 2006.
Odločitev zadevne dežele, ki je bila sprejeta oktobra 2007 in ki vsebuje pogojno zavezo za dodelitev pomoči, se ne more obravnavati kot odločilni dejavnik, zaradi katerega bi bila družba Fri-El Acerra spodbujena k izvedbi naložbenega projekta, ki se je dejansko začel z nakupom elektrarne februarja 2006.
The decision of the Region taken in October 2007 cannot be considered sufficient to prove the incentive effect of the aid even if the date on which work started on the project is taken to be the date of the first construction work carried out by Fri-El Acerra, in July 2007, as that work also predated the decision.
Odločitev zadevne dežele iz oktobra 2007 se ne more šteti za zadosten dokaz spodbujevalnega učinka pomoči, tudi če bi se kot datum začetka izvajanja projekta obravnaval datum, ko je družba Fri-El Acerra opravila prva gradbena dela (julija 2007), saj se je tudi to zgodilo pred sprejetjem navedene odločitve.
As proof of the incentive effect for Fri-El Acerra’s incentive project, the Italian authorities further refer to the minutes of a meeting, held on 6 October 2005, of the committee supervising the implementation of the Programme Agreement of 15 July 2005.
Italijanski organi kot dokaz spodbujevalnega učinka za naložbeni projekt družbe Fri-El Acerra nadalje navajajo zapisnik sestanka, ki ga je 6. oktobra 2005 sklical odbor za nadzor nad izvajanjem sporazuma o programu z dne 15. julija 2005.
At this meeting, according to the minutes, the NGP representative for the first time referred to the Fri-El Group as a potential investor that had manifested an interest in taking over the closed power plant.
V skladu z zapisnikom je na tem sestanku predstavnik družbe NGP prvič navedel skupino Fri-El kot morebitnega vlagatelja, ki je pokazal zanimanje za prevzem zaprte elektrarne.
Even if the Commission were to consider that the amendment of 6 April 2006 constituted a letter awarding aid (which it does not), the letter would not satisfy the tests of paragraph 38 of the 2007 Guidelines.
Tudi če bi Komisija menila, da sprememba z dne 6. aprila 2006 pomeni pismo, s katerim se dodeljuje pomoč (pa ne meni tako), to pismo ne bi izpolnjevalo meril, določenih v odstavku 38 smernic iz leta 2007.
But the Commission considers that the number of jobs created is manifestly disproportionate to the amount to be given in aid, which is EUR 19,5 million, meaning that the ad hoc aid per directly created job is EUR 780000; the disproportion is especially striking by comparison with a large number of ad hoc regional aid measures that the Commission has approved in recent years, where the average aid per job maintained or created was below EUR 70000 [38].
Vendar meni, da je število ustvarjenih delovnih mest očitno nesorazmerno z zneskom pomoči, ki se dodeljuje in znaša 19,5 milijona EUR, kar pomeni, da znaša ad hoc pomoč na neposredno ustvarjeno delovno mesto 780000 EUR; ta nesorazmernost je posebej izrazita v primerjavi s številnimi ad hoc ukrepi regionalne pomoči, ki jih je Komisija odobrila v zadnjih letih in pri katerih je pomoč na ohranjeno ali ustvarjeno delovno mesto povprečno znašala manj kot 70000 EUR [38].
This conclusion holds even when allowance is made for fact that the costs of job creation or maintenance may be vary between Member States.
Ta ugotovitev drži tudi ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se lahko stroški ustvarjanja ali ohranjanja delovnih mest med državami članicami razlikujejo.
Commission Decision of 28 November 2007 on state aid case N 324/2007 Italy: Regional state aid map 2007–2013, C(2007) 5618 def. cor.
Odločba Komisije z dne 28. novembra 2007 o državni pomoči N 324/2007 – Italija: Karta regionalnih državnih pomoči za 2007–2013, C(2007) 5618 def. cor.
(OJ C 90, 11.4.2008, p. 4).
(UL C 90, 11.4.2008, str. 4).
First, the amendment came after the start of work (9 February 2006).
Prvič, sprememba je bila sprejeta po začetku dela (9. februarja 2006).
Second, the amendment, like the original Programme Agreement, does not provide all the information required in a letter of intent: in particular, it does not indicate the amount of the eligible costs or the amount of aid to be granted, and does not contain a conditionality clause.
Drugič, tako kot prvotni sporazum o programu ne vsebuje vseh informacij, zahtevanih v pismu o nameri: zlasti v njej nista navedena višina upravičenih stroškov ali znesek pomoči, ki bo dodeljena, poleg tega pa v njej ni klavzule o pogojenosti.
Third, the letter refers expressly to a regional scheme that expired on 31 December 2006 [33].
Tretjič, sprememba vsebuje izrecno sklicevanje na regionalno shemo, ki se je iztekla 31. decembra 2006 [33].
The Italian authorities gave the Commission details of Fri-El Acerra’s purchase of the closed power plant from NGP.
Italijanski organi so Komisiji predložili podrobnosti o nakupu zaprte elektrarne, ki jo je družba Fri-El Acerra kupila od družbe NGP.
The Italian authorities explained that when NGP had subscribed to the increase in Fri-El Acerra’s capital it had transferred to Fri-El Acerra the branch of its business related to the power plant, at a total value of EUR 8296520; this was subject to EUR 3771043 in debts to third parties, and the difference, rounded to EUR 4525000, was allocated to reserves.
Pojasnili so, da je družba NGP, ko je vpisala povečanje kapitala v družbi Fri-El Acerra, na to prenesla oddelek svoje dejavnosti, povezan z elektrarno, v skupni vrednosti 8296520 EUR; od tega so dolgovi do tretjih oseb znašali 3771043 EUR, razlika, zaokrožena na 4525000 EUR, pa je bila prenesena v kapitalske rezerve.
Unofficial Commission translation.
Neuradni prevod Komisije.
Court of First Instance in Case T-396/08 Freistaat Sachsen v Commission, 8 July 2010, not yet published in the ECR, paragraphs 46 and 47.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. julija 2010 v zadevi T-396/08, Freistaat Sachsen proti Komisiji, še neobjavljena v Zodl., točki 46 in 47.
Resolution No 1857 of the Campania Regional Executive, 26 October 2007 [10].2.6. The aid
resolucija št. 1857 deželnega sveta Kampanje z dne 26. oktobra 2007 [10].2.6 Pomoč
The regional contribution of the ad hoc aid to Fri-El Acerra had not been demonstrated as required by paragraph 10 of the 2007 Guidelines: ‘Where, exceptionally, it is envisaged to grant individual ad hoc aid to a single firm … it is the responsibility of the Member State to demonstrate that the project contributes towards a coherent regional development strategy’. The creation (or maintenance) of 25 jobs, against aid of EUR 19,5 million, and the contribution of a biofuel power plant with a capacity of 75 MW to a regional energy deficit of 2489 MW, did not appear to be sufficient, and the aid appeared to be disproportionate to the impact of the project.
Regionalni prispevek ad hoc pomoči za družbo Fri-El Acerra ni bil dokazan, kot se zahteva v odstavku 10 smernic iz leta 2007: „Kadar je izjemoma predvidena dodelitev posamične ad hoc pomoči enemu samemu podjetju […], mora država članica dokazati, da projekt prispeva h koherentni regionalni razvojni strategiji.“ Vzpostavitev (ali ohranitev) 25 delovnih mest in prispevek elektrarne na biogorivo z zmogljivostjo 75 MW k primanjkljaju električne energije v regiji, ki znaša 2489 MW, se glede na pomoč v višini 19,5 milijona EUR nista zdela zadostna, pomoč pa se je zdela nesorazmerna z učinkom projekta.
Hence, the sale of the tanks was also between independent parties. And the parties determined the asset value of the tanks in strict adherence to market conditions, applying the same criteria and parameters that had been applied by the independent expert in the report valuing the power plant.
Tako je bila tudi prodaja teh rezervoarjev izvedena med neodvisnima strankama, ki sta njihovo vrednost določili ob strogem upoštevanju tržnih pogojev ter z istimi merili in parametri, kot jih je uporabil neodvisni strokovnjak v poročilu o vrednotenju elektrarne.
of 18 February 2011
z dne 18. februarja 2011
authorising France, pursuant to Council Directive 92/66/EEC, to transport day-old chicks and ready-to-lay pullets outside the protection zone established due to an outbreak of Newcastle disease in the department of Côtes d’Armor
o dovoljenju Franciji, v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/66/EGS, za prevoz enodnevnih piščancev ali kokoši, ki so tik pred nesenjem, z okuženega območja, določenega zaradi izbruha atipične kokošje kuge v departmaju Côtes d’Armor
Having regard to Council Directive 92/66/EEC of 14 July 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of Newcastle disease [1], and in particular Article 9(2)(f)(ii) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/66/EGS z dne 14. julija 1992 o uvedbi ukrepov Skupnosti za nadzor atipične kokošje kuge [1] in zlasti člena 9(2)(f)(ii) Direktive,
Directive 92/66/EEC defines the Union control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of Newcastle disease in poultry or in racing pigeons and other birds kept in captivity.
Direktiva 92/66/EGS opredeljuje nadzorne ukrepe Unije, ki jih je treba uporabiti v primeru izbruha atipične kokošje kuge pri perutnini ali tekmovalnih golobih in drugih pticah, ki se gojijo v ujetništvu.
Pursuant to that Directive, once the diagnosis of Newcastle disease has been officially confirmed in poultry, the Member State concerned is to ensure that the competent authority establishes around the infected holding a protection zone based on a minimum radius of 3 kilometres, itself contained in a surveillance zone based on a minimum radius of 10 kilometres.
Ko se v skladu s to direktivo pri perutnini uradno potrdi diagnoza atipične kokošje kuge, mora zadevna država članica poskrbeti, da pristojni organ okrog okuženega gospodarstva določi okuženo območje s polmerom najmanj tri kilometre, ki je znotraj ogroženega območja s polmerom najmanj deset kilometrov.
The measures applied in the protection zone are to include a prohibition on removing poultry and hatching eggs from the holding on which they are kept, unless the competent authority has authorised the transport under certain conditions.
Ukrepi na okuženem območju morajo vključevati prepoved premikov perutnine in valilnih jajc z gospodarstva, na katerem se redijo, razen če pristojni organ dovoli prevoz pod nekaterimi pogoji.