natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The target secondary variables should be sent to Eurostat in the Household Data file (H-file) and in the Personal Data File (P-file) after the target primary variables.
Ciljne sekundarne spremenljivke je treba Eurostatu poslati v podatkovni datoteki o gospodinjstvih (H) in podatkovni datoteki o osebah (P) po ciljnih primarnih spremenljivkah.
Housing conditions
Stanovanjske razmere
ITEMS ASKED AT HOUSEHOLD LEVEL
VPRAŠANJA NA RAVNI GOSPODINJSTVA
Space in the dwelling
Stanovanjski prostor
Shortage of space in the dwelling
Pomanjkanje stanovanjskega prostora
Filled
izpolnjeno
Missing
neizpolnjeno
Size of the dwelling in square meters
Velikost stanovanja v kvadratnih metrih
0-999 square meters
0–999 kvadratnih metrov
Not applicable (no electrical installations)
ni relevantno (ni električnih napeljav)
Adequate plumbing/water installations
Ustrezna vodovodna napeljava/kanalizacija
Not applicable (no plumbing/water installations)
ni relevantno (ni vodovodne napeljave/kanalizacije)
Yes – central heating or similar
da – centralno ogrevanje ali podobno
Yes – other fixed heating
da – drugi vgrajeni viri ogrevanja
Yes – non-fixed heating
da – nevgrajeni viri ogrevanja
No – no heating at all
ne – ni ogrevanja
Overall satisfaction with the dwelling
Splošno zadovoljstvo s stanovanjem
Very dissatisfied
zelo nezadovoljen
Dissatisfied
nezadovoljen
Satisfied
zadovoljen
Very satisfied
zelo zadovoljen
Accessibility of grocery services
Dostopnost oskrbe z živili
With great difficulty
zelo težavna
With some difficulty
nekoliko težavna
Easily
lahka
Very easily
zelo lahka
Not applicable (services not used by the household)
ni relevantno (gospodinjstvo ne uporablja storitev)
Accessibility of primary health care services
Dostopnost osnovnih storitev zdravstvenega varstva
Risk of changing the dwelling
Tveganje spremembe bivališča
Immediate risk of changing the dwelling
Neposredno tveganje spremembe bivališča
Yes – household will be forced to leave the dwelling
da –gospodinjstvo se bo prisiljeno izseliti
Yes – household plans to change the dwelling
da –gospodinjstvo načrtuje spremembo bivališča
No – household does not expect any change of the dwelling
ne –gospodinjstvo ne pričakuje spremembe bivališča
Main reason for the expectation to be forced to leave the dwelling
Glavni razlog za pričakovano prisilno izselitev
Household will be forced to leave, since notice has been/will be given by the landlord on termination of the contract
gospodinjstvo se bo prisiljeno izseliti, ker je/bo najemodajalec poslal obvestilo o prekinitvi pogodbe
Household will be forced to leave, since notice has been/will be given by the landlord in the absence of a formal contract
gospodinjstvo se bo prisiljeno izseliti, ker je najemodajalec brez podpisane uradne pogodbe najem odpovedal
Household will be forced to leave because of eviction
gospodinjstvo se bo prisiljeno izseliti zaradi deložacije
Household will be forced to leave for financial difficulties
gospodinjstvo se bo prisiljeno izseliti zaradi finančnih težav
Household will be forced to leave for some other reasons
gospodinjstvo se bo prisiljeno izseliti zaradi drugih razlogov
Not applicable (HC150 = 2 or 3)
ni relevantno ( HC150 = 2 ali 3)
ITEMS ASKED AT INDIVIDUAL LEVEL
VPRAŠANJA NA RAVNI POSAMEZNIKA
Change of the dwelling
Sprememba bivališča
Main reason for the change of the dwelling
Glavni razlog za spremembo bivališča
Family-related reasons
družinski razlogi
Employment-related reasons
razlogi v zvezi z zaposlitvijo
Education-related reasons
razlogi v zvezi izobraževanjem
Eviction
deložacija
Landlord did not prolong the contract
najemodajalec ni podaljšal najemne pogodbe
Desire to change tenure status
želja po spremembi najemniškega statusa
Dwelling-related reasons
razlogi v zvezi z bivališčem
Neighbourhood-related reasons
razlogi v zvezi s sosesko
Financial reasons
finančni razlogi
Other reasons
drugi razlogi
Not applicable (PC170 = 2)
ni relevantno (PC170 = 2)
Central heating or similar a housing unit is considered ‘centrally heated’ if heating is provided either from a community heating centre or from an installation built in the building or in the housing unit, established for heating purposes, without attention paid to the source of energy.
Centralno ogrevanje ali podobno stanovanjska enota se šteje za „centralno ogrevano“, če je ogrevanje zagotovljeno iz toplarne ali iz naprave v stavbi ali stanovanjski enoti, namenjene ogrevanju, ne glede na vir energije.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1158/2010
on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining railway safety certificates
o skupni varnostni metodi ocenjevanja skladnosti z zahtevami za pridobitev železniških varnostnih spričeval
Having regard to Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on Safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive) [1], and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o varnosti na železnicah Skupnosti ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 95/18/ES o izdaji licence prevoznikom v železniškem prometu in Direktive 2001/14/ES o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti, naložitvi uporabnin za uporabo železniške infrastrukture in podeljevanju varnostnega spričevala (Direktiva o varnosti na železnici) [1], in zlasti člena 6(1) Direktive,
Having regard to Recommendation ERA/REC/SAF/09-2009 from the European Railway Agency, delivered to the Commission on 18 September 2009, on a common safety method for conformity assessment.
ob upoštevanju Priporočila ERA/REC/SAF/09-2009 Evropske agencije za železniški promet, ki jih je Komisija prejela 18. septembra 2009, o skupni varnostni metodi za oceno skladnosti,
Directive 2004/49/EC provides a framework for equal conditions for all railway undertakings, through the application of the same safety certification requirements across the Union.
Direktiva 2004/49/ES zagotavlja okvir za enakopravne pogoje za vsa železniška podjetja tako, da po celotni Uniji veljajo iste zahteve za varnostna spričevala.
The purpose of the common safety method (CSM) is to provide a framework for national safety authorities to harmonise their decision-making criteria across the Union, in accordance with Article 17(4) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Namen skupne varnostne metode (SVM) je zagotoviti okvir za nacionalne varnostne organe, da bodo lahko uskladili merila za odločanje po vsej Uniji v skladu s členom 17(4) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
It is necessary to provide for a method for national safety authorities to assess the adequacy of processes developed by railway undertakings to meet the harmonised requirements for obtaining Part A safety certificates issued in accordance with Article 10(2)(a) and Part B safety certificates issued in accordance with Article 10(2)(b) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Treba je zagotoviti metodo, po kateri bodo lahko nacionalni varnostni organi ocenjevali ustreznost postopkov, ki so jih razvila železniška podjetja za izpolnjevanje usklajenih zahtev za pridobivanje varnostnih spričeval dela A, izdanih v skladu s členom 10(2)(a) in varnostnih spričeval dela B, izdanih v skladu s členom 10(2)(b) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
The criteria by which assessment by national safety authorities shall be carried out should be defined and the procedures to be followed should be established.
Opredeliti je treba merila, s katerimi nacionalni varnostni organi izvajajo ocenjevanje, in vzpostaviti postopke, ki jih je treba upoštevati.
Regarding conformity with the safety requirement according to which responsibility for railway vehicle maintenance should be clearly defined, a railway undertaking which is not the entity in charge of maintenance for all vehicles used in its operation, should through appropriate contractual arrangements, such as the General Contract of Use (GCU), ensure that every vehicle has an entity in charge of maintenance to take responsibility for vehicle maintenance in accordance with Article 14a of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Glede skladnosti z varnostnimi zahtevami, ki zahtevajo, da mora biti odgovornost za vzdrževanje železniških vozil jasno opredeljena, mora železniško podjetje, ki ni odgovorni subjekt za vzdrževanje vseh vozil, ki jih uporablja za delovanje, z ustreznimi pogodbenimi dogovori, kot je Splošni sporazum o uporabi (GCU), zagotoviti, da je za vsako vozilo na voljo subjekt, ki je odgovoren za vzdrževanje in prevzame odgovornost za vzdrževanje vozil v skladu s členom 14a Direktive 2004/49/ES.
The contract between the parties should specify the exchange of information between both undertakings needed to guarantee the safe operation of vehicles.
Pogodba med strankama mora določiti izmenjavo informacij med obema organizacijama, ki je potrebna za zagotavljanje varnega delovanja vozil.
In assessing conformity with safety requirements of products or services provided by contractors or suppliers of railway undertakings, such as provision of services by training centres recognised in accordance with Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the certification of train drivers operating locomotives and trains on the railway system in the Community [2], authorisations or certificates granted in accordance with relevant Union law to contractors or suppliers may be considered valid evidence.
Pri ocenjevanju skladnosti z varnostnimi zahtevami za izdelke ali storitve, ki jih nudijo pogodbeniki ali dobavitelji železniških podjetij, kot je nudenje storitev izobraževalnih središč, priznanih v skladu z Direktivo 2007/59/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o izdaji spričeval strojevodjem, ki upravljajo lokomotive in vlake na železniškem omrežju Skupnosti [2], se lahko pooblastila ali spričevala, dodeljena pogodbenikom ali dobaviteljem v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Unije, štejejo kot veljavno dokazilo.
Certification of entities in charge of maintenance in accordance with Article 14a of Directive 2004/49/EC may also be regarded valid evidence.
Tudi spričevala subjektov, odgovornih za vzdrževanje v skladu s členom 14a Direktive 2004/49/ES, se lahko štejejo za veljavno dokazilo.
Until the European certification system enters into force, certificates delivered on the basis of the Memorandum of Understanding establishing the basic principles of a common system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for freight wagons [3] signed on 14 May 2009 may be considered valid evidence when assessing conformity with relevant safety requirements.
Dokler ustrezni evropski sistem za izdajanje spričeval ne začne veljati, se lahko spričevala, dodeljena na podlagi Memoranduma o soglasju, ki vzpostavlja temeljna načela skupnega sistema izdajanja spričeval podjetjem, ki vzdržujejo tovorne vagone [3], podpisanega 14. maja 2009, štejejo za veljavno dokazilo pri ocenjevanju skladnosti z ustreznimi varnostnimi zahtevami.
National safety authorities assess a railway undertaking’s ability to comply with all the requirements required to operate in general and on the specific network for which it is seeking a certificate by assessing its safety management system at global level.
Nacionalni varnostni organi ugotovijo sposobnost železniškega podjetja za upoštevanje vseh zahtev, potrebnih za delovanje na splošnem in določenem omrežju, za katerega želi dobiti spričevalo, na podlagi ocene njegovega sistema za upravljanje varnosti na globalni ravni.
Each national safety authority should put in place arrangements to examine whether the results outlined in the application for a safety certificate are being delivered in operation after the award of the certificate and whether all the necessary requirements are complied with on a continuous basis, as required by Article 16(2)(f) and Article 17(2) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Vsak nacionalni varnostni organ mora zagotoviti ukrepe za preverjanje, ali se pri delovanju po dodelitvi spričevala dosegajo rezultati, navedeni v vlogi za varnostno spričevalo, in ali se stalno upoštevajo vse potrebne zahteve v skladu s členom 16(2)(f) in členom 17(2) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
This therefore requires the development of a post-award supervision regime based on key fundamental principles in order to ensure a harmonised approach by national safety authorities in each Member State.
V ta namen je treba razviti režim nadzora po dodelitvi spričevala, ki temelji na ključnih temeljnih načelih, da se zagotovi usklajen pristop nacionalnih varnostnih organov v vsaki državi članici.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 27(1) of Directive 2004/49/EC,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora iz člena 27(1) Direktive 2004/49/ES –
This Regulation establishes a common safety method (CSM) for assessing conformity with requirements for obtaining safety certificates as referred to in Article 6(3)(b) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Ta uredba vzpostavi skupne varnostne metode (SVM) ocenjevanja skladnosti z zahtevami za pridobitev železniških varnostnih spričeval iz člena 6(3)(b) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
The CSM includes:
SVM zajema:
a procedure and criteria for assessing applications by railway undertakings for safety certificates as referred to in Article 10(2) of Directive 2004/49/EC, as set out in Annexes I, II and III to this Regulation;
postopek in merila ocenjevanja vlog železniških podjetij za varnostna spričevala iz člena 10(2) Direktive 2004/49/ES, kot je določeno v Prilogah I, II in III k tej uredbi,
principles for supervising compliance with the requirements of Directive 2004/49/EC after the national safety authority has granted the certificate, as set out in Annex IV to this Regulation.
načela za nadziranje skladnosti z zahtevami Direktive 2004/49/ES potem, ko je nacionalni varnostni organ dodelil spričevalo, kakor je določeno v Prilogi IV k tej uredbi.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definition shall apply: ‘supervision’ means the arrangements put in place by the national safety authority to oversee safety performance after it has granted a safety certificate.
Za namene te uredbe se uporablja naslednja opredelitev: „nadzor“ so ukrepi, ki jih zagotovi nacionalni varnostni organ za nadzor varnega delovanja potem, ko je dodelil varnostno spričevalo.
Procedures for assessing applications
Postopki ocenjevanja vlog
When examining applications for both Part A and Part B safety certificates submitted after the entry into force of this Regulation, national safety authorities shall apply the procedure set out in Annex I to this Regulation for assessing their conformity with requirements in Directive 2004/49/EC.
Nacionalni varnostni organi pri pregledu vlog za varnostna spričevala dela A in dela B, predloženih po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe, uporabljajo za ocenjevanje njihove skladnosti z zahtevami Direktive 2004/49/ES postopke, določene v Prilogi I k tej uredbi.
National safety authorities shall use the assessment criteria set out in Annex II to this Regulation for safety certificates issued in accordance with Article 10(3) of Directive 2004/49/EC and those contained in Annex III to this Regulation for safety certificates issued in accordance with Article 10(4) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Nacionalni varnostni organi uporabljajo merila ocenjevanja iz Priloge II k tej uredbi za varnostna spričevala, izdana v skladu s členom 10(3) Direktive 2004/49/ES, merila iz Priloge III k tej uredbi pa za varnostna spričevala, izdana v skladu s členom 10(4) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
These criteria shall also be used in case of renewal of safety certificates in accordance with Article 10(5) of Directive 2004/49/EC.
Ta merila se uporabljajo tudi v primeru obnovitve varnostnih spričeval v skladu s členom 10(5) Direktive 2004/49/ES.
During assessment, national safety authorities may accept commitments by applicants that they will manage risks through the use of contracts with third parties.
Med ocenjevanjem lahko nacionalni varnostni organi sprejemajo zaveze vlagateljev, da bodo obvladovali tveganja z uporabo pogodb s tretjimi osebami.
The contracts shall also specify the exchange of information needed to ensure the safe operation of vehicles, especially in the areas relating to managing maintenance.
V pogodbah se določi tudi izmenjava informacij, potrebnih za zagotavljanje varnega delovanja vozil, zlasti na področjih, povezanih z upravljanjem vzdrževanja.
Products or services provided by contractors or suppliers to railway undertakings shall be presumed to conform to safety requirements if the contractors, suppliers or products are certified in accordance with relevant certification schemes established under Union legislation, for the provision of such products and services.
Izdelki ali storitve, ki jih nudijo pogodbeniki ali dobavitelji železniškim podjetjem, štejejo za usklajene z varnostnimi zahtevami, če so pogodbeniki, dobavitelji ali izdelki potrjeni v skladu z ustreznimi shemami potrjevanja, določenimi v skladu z zakonodajo Unije, za zagotavljanje takih izdelkov in storitev.
After granting a safety certificate, national safety authorities shall, for both Part A and Part B safety certificates, supervise railway undertakings’ continued application of their safety management system and shall apply the principles for supervision set out in Annex IV.
Nacionalni varnostni organi po dodelitvi varnostnih spričeval dela A in dela B nadzirajo stalno uporabo sistema za upravljanje varnosti pri železniških podjetjih in uporabljajo načela za nadzor, določena v Prilogi IV.
Procedure for assessing conformity with requirements for obtaining safety certificates to be issued in accordance with Article 10(2)(a) and (b) of Directive 2004/49/EC
Postopek ocenjevanja skladnosti z zahtevami za pridobitev varnostnih spričeval, ki se izdajo v skladu s členom 10(2)(a) in (b) Direktive 2004/49/ES
The procedures that a national safety authority puts in place to receive and assess applications and to award safety certificates shall be built upon the following framework principles.
Postopek, ki ga določi nacionalni varnostni organ za sprejemanje in ocenjevanje vlog ter dodeljevanje varnostnih spričeval, temelji na naslednjih okvirnih načelih.
Setting up and reviewing the assessment process
Vzpostavitev in pregledovanje postopka ocenjevanja
National safety authorities shall develop structured and auditable processes to be undertaken by suitably competent persons.
Nacionalni varnostni organi razvijejo strukturirane in pregledne postopke, ki jih izvajajo osebe z ustreznimi pristojnostmi.
They shall scrutinise applications against the assessment criteria for safety management systems set out in Annex II and III.
Natančno pregledajo vloge glede na merila ocenjevanja sistemov za upravljanje varnosti, določena v prilogah II in III.
They shall record and give reasons for all decisions.
Vse odločitve zabeležijo in utemeljijo.
The national safety authority’s overall assessment process shall be periodically internally reviewed and continuously improved to secure its continued effectiveness and efficiency.
Celotni postopek ocenjevanja nacionalnega varnostnega organa se redno interno pregleduje in nenehno izboljšuje, da se zagotovi njegova trajna smotrnost in učinkovitost.
Quality of the assessment process
Kakovost postopka ocenjevanja
National safety authorities shall monitor the quality of their own performance at key stages in the processing of applications for safety certificates.
Nacionalni varnostni organi spremljajo kakovost lastnega delovanja na ključnih stopnjah obdelave vlog za varnostna spričevala.
Scope of the assessment
Področje uporabe ocene
The assessment shall be at management-system level and process-driven.
Ocena se izvaja na ravni sistema upravljanja in temelji na postopku.
Where scrutiny reveals shortcomings, the national safety authority may exercise discretion and, depending on the nature and seriousness of the non-conformity, shall outline the points which need to be enhanced.
Če natančni pregled razkrije pomanjkljivosti, lahko nacionalni varnostni organ uveljavi pooblastilo in, odvisno od narave in obsega neskladnosti, navede točke, ki jih je treba izboljšati.
Ultimately, the national safety authority shall exercise its power to reject an application.
V skrajnem primeru lahko nacionalni varnostni organ s svojimi pooblastili zavrne vlogo.
The assessment shall be:
Ocena:
appropriate to the risks, character and extent of operations of the applicant;
ustreza tveganjem, lastnosti in obsegu delovanja vlagatelja;
based on judgments of the railway undertaking’s overall ability to operate safely as described in its safety management system.
temelji na presoji splošne sposobnosti železniškega za varno delovanje, kot je opisano v njegovem sistemu varnega upravljanja.
Timing of the assessment
Časovni okvir ocene
National safety authorities shall complete the assessment within the time period required by Article 12 of Directive 2004/49/EC whilst ensuring that the evidence provided by the applicant is sufficiently examined.
Nacionalni varnostni organi končajo oceno v časovnem obdobju iz člena 12 Direktive 2004/49/ES, pri čemer morajo zagotoviti, da so dokazi, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, dovolj dobro preučeni.
The national safety authority shall inform railway undertakings of issues of major concern as early as practically possible during the assessment phase.
Nacionalni varnostni organ obvesti železniška podjetja o večjih težavah med fazo ocenjevanja takoj, ko je to mogoče.
Decision making during the assessment
Sprejemanje odločitev med ocenjevanjem
A decision to accept or reject an application for a safety certificate or authorisation shall be based on the evidence provided by the applicant and on whether compliance with the relevant requirements has been shown or not.
Odločitev o sprejemu ali zavrnitvi vloge za varnostno spričevalo ali dovoljenje temelji na dokazih, ki jih predloži vlagatelj, in na ugotovitvi, ali je izkazana skladnost z ustreznimi zahtevami.
The national safety authority shall assess whether the application for a safety certificate complies with Commission Regulation (EC) No 653/2007 [1].3.
Nacionalni varnostni organ oceni, ali je vloga za varnostno spričevalo v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 653/2007 [1].3.
In particular, the national safety authority shall assess whether the attached summary of the safety management system manual allows an initial judgment on the quality and appropriateness of the safety management system and shall decide in which areas further information is necessary.
Nacionalni varnostni organ oceni zlasti, ali priloženi povzetek priročnika za sistem varnega upravljanja omogoča začetno presojo kakovosti in ustreznosti sistema varnega upravljanja, in se odloči, na katerih področjih so potrebne dodatne informacije.
The national safety authority may, as part of this request for more information, seek as much detailed information as it deems reasonably necessary to help its assessment of the application.
Nacionalni varnostni organ lahko v okviru te zahteve za več informacij zahteva tako podrobne informacije, kakor se mu zdijo smiselno potrebne za pomoč pri oceni vloge.
When granting a safety certificate, compliance of the applicant’s safety management system with the assessment criteria shall be documented in relation to each assessment criterion.
Pri dodelitvi varnostnega spričevala se skladnost vlagateljevega sistema varnega upravljanja z merili ocenjevanja dokumentira v povezavi z vsakim merilom ocenjevanja.
When identifying a point of query or possible non-compliance, the national safety authority shall be specific and help the applicant to understand the level of detail expected in the response.
Pri ugotavljanju vprašljive točke ali morebitne neskladnosti je nacionalni varnostni organ natančen in vlagatelju razloži raven podrobnosti odgovora, ki jo pričakuje.
To do this it shall:
V ta namen: