natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation has shown that even though the Indian Rupee appreciated progressively against the euro during the second half of the IP, for each Indian exporting producer its prices for sales of the main products to several main customers actually changed on a month-to-month basis, in particular during the second half of the IP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bila apreciacija INR do EUR v drugi polovici OP sicer postopna, vendar so se cene posameznih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov pri prodaji glavnih izdelkov več glavnim strankam dejansko spreminjale iz meseca v mesec, zlasti v drugi polovici OP.
Therefore, there is no indication that prices for sales to the Union could not have been modified at the same time to reflect also changes in currency exchange rates within 60 days as provided for in Article 2(10)(j) of the basic Regulation and Article 2.4.1 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement.
Zato ni nobenih dokazov, da cene pri prodaji v Unijo niso bile hkrati spremenjene tudi na podlagi sprememb menjalnih tečajev v roku 60 dni, kot je določeno v členu 2(10)(j) osnovne uredbe in členu 2(4)(1) protidampinškega sporazuma STO.
Since, in several cases, prices were changed frequently, any change in exchange rates could also have been reflected.
Ker so bile cene v več primerih pogosto spremenjene, se je lahko upoštevala tudi kakršna koli sprememba menjalnih tečajev.
Moreover, this showed that FOH market in general is open to accept frequent changes in prices.
Poleg tega je to pokazalo, da je trg maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic na splošno odprt za pogoste spremembe cen.
Therefore, even in cases where prices were changed less frequently, there is no evidence that this was not because of the business choice made by the parties.
Zato tudi v primerih, v katerih so bile cene spremenjene manj pogosto, ni dokazov, da razlog za to ni bila poslovna izbira strank.
The fact that prices can be adapted quickly to reflect modified market situations (in this case, allegedly changes in currency exchange rates) gave the Indian exporting producers the possibility to reflect such changes in their selling prices if they had so wished and apparently done in a number of cases.
Dejstvo, da je mogoče cene hitro prilagajati spremenjenim razmeram na trgu (v tem primeru domnevno spremembam menjalnih tečajev), je indijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom omogočilo, da so te spremembe po želji upoštevali pri svojih prodajnih cenah, kar so očitno tudi večkrat storili.
In view of the above, an adjustment for currency conversions is not warranted and the claim is rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega prilagoditev pretvorbe valut ni utemeljena, zato se zahteva zavrne.
Following provisional disclosure, one Indian exporting producer claimed that an allowance granted under Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation for differences in indirect taxes, which had been made in respect of certain product types, should also have been made in respect of products and blends with chain lengths of C12 and C14 because the duty paid on raw materials used for these products was refunded upon export of the product.
Po začasnem razkritju je eden od indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdil, da bi bilo treba nadomestilo, odobreno v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe za razlike v posrednih davkih, ki so se uporabile v zvezi z nekaterimi vrstami izdelkov, odobriti tudi za izdelke in mešanice s številom C12 in C14, ker je bila dajatev za surovine, ki so se uporabile za te izdelke, vrnjena ob izvozu izdelka.
However, no information which could be verified on spot was submitted during the investigation, proving that indeed such duties had been subsequently refunded.
Vendar med preiskavo niso bile predložene nobene informacije, ki bi jih bilo mogoče preveriti na kraju samem in ki bi dokazovale, da so bile te dajatve pozneje dejansko vrnjene.
Following definitive disclosure, the company claimed that its comments had been misunderstood and that all the raw materials used for the production of products and blends with chain lengths of C12 and C14 had been imported duty free.
Po dokončnem razkritju je družba trdila, da so se njene pripombe napačno razumele in da so bile vse surovine, uporabljene pri proizvodnji izdelkov in mešanic s številom C12 in C14, uvožene brez dajatev.
Since an indirect tax needs to be paid if these raw materials are consequently incorporated into products sold on the domestic market, the company claims an adjustment of the normal value for these specific product types.
Ker je treba plačati posredni davek, če se te surovine posledično vključijo v izdelke, prodane na domačem trgu, družba za te posebne vrste izdelkov zahteva prilagoditev normalne vrednosti.
However, the evidence submitted during the verification shows that the specific raw materials that are needed for the production of the product types with chain lengths C12 and C14 and that were imported duty free during the IP, were sufficient to manufacture only a fraction of the company’s export sales of this product during the IP.
Vendar dokazi, predloženi med preverjanjem, kažejo, da so posebne surovine, ki so potrebne za proizvodnjo vrste izdelka s številom C12 in C14 ter uvožene brez dajatev v OP, zadostovale le za proizvodnjo dela izvoza družbe tega izdelka v OP.
It is therefore certain that at least two thirds of the exported product with chain lengths C12 and C14 have been manufactured by using raw materials for which import duties had been paid.
Zato je gotovo, da sta bili vsaj dve tretjini izvoženega izdelka s številom C12 in C14 proizvedeni s surovinami, za katere so bile plačane uvozne dajatve.
Since the company has never submitted any evidence showing that any of these raw materials imported duty free was used for export sales to the Union and not for export sales to third countries, the claim is rejected.
Ker družba ni predložila dokazov, da bi bile te surovine, uvožene brez dajatev, uporabljene za izvoz v EU in izvoz v tretje države, se zahteva zavrne.
In the absence of any other comments in respect of comparison, the content of recitals 20 and 23 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 20 in 23 začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments concerning the dumping margin calculation, the content of recitals 24 to 26 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izračunom stopnje dampinga ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 24 do 26 začasne uredbe potrdi.
The amount of dumping finally determined, expressed as a percentage of the cif net free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, is as follows:
Dokončno določena stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek neto cene CIF franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve, je:
Following provisional and definitive disclosures, one Indonesian exporting producer claimed that in testing the profitability of transactions, the selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, should not have been allocated to individual transactions on the basis of turnover, and that this had led to a number of transactions being found to be unprofitable.
Po začasnem in dokončnem razkritju je eden od indonezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdil, da se pri preizkušanju dobičkonosnosti transakcij prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški (PSA-stroški) ne bi smeli pripisati posameznim transakcijam na podlagi prihodkov od prodaje in da zato številne transakcije niso bile dobičkonosne.
The claim was examined, but it was found that matching SG&A expenses to individual transactions on the basis of turnover is more appropriate given the nature of such expenses, which are more value-related rather than volume-related.
Trditev je bila preučena, vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da je primernejše usklajevanje PSA-stroškov s posameznimi transakcijami na podlagi prihodkov od prodaje, saj je za take stroške značilno, da so bolj kot s količino povezani z vrednostjo.
It should be noted that the total amount of SG&A expenses allocated to each product type remains the same irrespective of which of the two methods is used for matching SG&A expenses to individual transactions.
Navesti je treba, da je skupni znesek PSA-stroškov, pripisanih vsaki vrsti izdelka, enak ne glede na to, katera od obeh metod se uporabi za usklajevanje PSA-stroškov s posameznimi transakcijami.
Finally, the transactions for which the exporting producer queried the outcome of the profitability test were re-examined and it was confirmed that the transactions were unprofitable.
Transakcije, v zvezi s katerimi je proizvajalec izvoznik poizvedoval o izidu preizkusa dobičkonosnosti, so bile ponovno preučene, pri čemer je bilo potrjeno, da transakcije niso bile dobičkonosne.
The same Indonesian exporting producer also claimed that, in determining the profit level used when constructing normal value, the profit of sales identified as not being in the ordinary course of trade at product type level should not be excluded, since more than 80 % of the overall domestic sales were profitable.
Isti indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da se pri določanju ravni dobička, ki se uporabi pri računski določitvi normalne vrednosti, ne sme izključiti dobiček od prodaje, za katero se šteje, da ni bila opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine na ravni vrste izdelka, ker je bilo dobičkonosnih več kot 80 % celotne domače prodaje.
With regard to this claim, it is recalled that the determination of which sales are in the ordinary course of trade is made at the level of product types, as explained in recitals 29 to 32 of the provisional Regulation, since this is the most appropriate way to accurately match sales prices with the relating costs of production.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba spomniti, da se prodaja v običajnem poteku trgovine določi na ravni vrste izdelka, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 29 do 32 začasne uredbe, ker je to najprimernejši način, da se prodajne cene natančno uskladijo s povezanimi stroški proizvodnje.
Furthermore, Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation does not exclude the division of the product investigated into product types where appropriate.
Poleg tega člen 2(6) osnovne uredbe ne izključuje razdeljevanja izdelka v preiskavi na vrste izdelka, kadar bi bilo potrebno.
Therefore, sales not found to be in the ordinary course of trade are excluded at product type level from the calculation of the profit to be used in constructing the normal value.
Zato se prodaja, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni bila opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine na ravni vrste izdelka, izključi iz izračuna dobička, ki se uporabi pri računski določitvi normalne vrednosti.
The same Indonesian exporting producer also claimed that when constructing normal value for certain product types, no deduction for allowances had been made in order to bring the normal values back to an ex-works level.
Isti indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da se pri računski določitvi normalne vrednosti za nekatere vrste izdelkov niso odštela nadomestila, da bi se normalne vrednosti ponovno vrnile na raven cene franko tovarna.
The claim was accepted and the calculation amended accordingly.
Trditev je bila sprejeta in izračun ustrezno spremenjen.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of normal value, the provisional findings in recitals 27 to 33 of the provisional Regulation — corrected as indicated in recital 26 of this Regulation — are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo normalne vrednosti ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 27 do 33 začasne uredbe – popravljene, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 26 – potrdijo.
Following provisional disclosure, one Indonesian exporting producer claimed that no justification had been given for considering the price to its related importer company in the Union as unreliable, and for the construction of the export price, in respect of such sales, under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Po začasnem razkritju je eden od indonezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdil, da ni bila predložena utemeljitev, na podlagi katere bi se cena za povezano družbo izvoznico v Uniji obravnavala kot nezanesljiva in računsko določila izvozna cena v zvezi s to prodajo v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
In this regard, it should be noted that transfer prices between related parties are not considered to be reliable because they could be artificially set at different levels depending on what would be more advantageous for the related companies concerned.
V zvezi s tem je treba navesti, da se transferne cene med povezanimi stranmi ne obravnavajo kot zanesljive, ker bi se lahko umetno določile na različnih ravneh glede na to, kaj bi bilo ugodnejše za zadevne povezane družbe.
For this reason, the construction of the export price under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, using a reasonable profit margin independent of the actual profit resulting from transfer prices, avoids any distorting effects that may arise from the transfer prices.
Zato se pri računski določitvi izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, pri kateri se uporabi razumna stopnja dobička, neodvisna od dejanskega dobička na podlagi transfernih cen, preprečijo kakršni koli izkrivljajoči učinki, ki bi lahko izhajali iz transfernih cen.
For export sales to the Union through related importers located in the Union, following provisional disclosure, both Indonesian exporters claimed that the profit margin used for the construction of the export price pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation was inappropriate.
V zvezi z izvozom v Unijo prek povezanih uvoznikov s sedežem v Uniji sta po začasnem razkritju oba indonezijska izvoznika trdila, da stopnja dobička, ki se je uporabila pri računski določitvi izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, ni bila ustrezna.
They both argued that the profit which had been used at the provisional stage referred to only one partially cooperating importer and had not been verified, and was therefore not reliable.
Oba sta trdila, da se je dobiček, ki se je uporabil v začasni fazi, nanašal le na enega delno sodelujočega uvoznika in se ni preveril ter zato ni zanesljiv.
Accordingly, they suggested using a profit of 5 % as it was done in other investigations.
V skladu s tem sta predlagala, da se tako kot pri drugih preiskavah uporabi 5-odstotni dobiček.
In consideration of the low level of cooperation by independent importers in this investigation, the claim is accepted and a profit level of 5 % was applied, which is in line with profits levels used in previous investigations for the same sector.
Ob upoštevanju nizke stopnje sodelovanja neodvisnih uvoznikov v tej preiskavi se trditev sprejme in uporabi se 5-odstotna stopnja dobička, kar je v skladu s stopnjami dobička, ki so se za isti sektor uporabile v prejšnjih preiskavah.
In the absence of any other comments in respect of comparison, the content of recitals 34 to 36 of the provisional Regulation — adjusted as explained in recital 29 of this Regulation — is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 34 do 36 začasne uredbe – prilagojena, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 29 – potrdi.
Following provisional disclosure both Indonesian exporters pointed out that no adjustment should have been made for differences in commissions pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) for sales via the respective related traders in a third country.
Po začasnem razkritju sta oba indonezijska izvoznika izpostavila, da se zaradi razlik v provizijah ne bi smela izvesti prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) za prodajo prek zadevnih povezanih trgovcev v tretji državi.
Both companies argued that their production companies in Indonesia and the respective related traders in Singapore form a single economic entity and that the traders in the third country act as the export department of their related Indonesian companies.
Obe družbi sta trdili, da njuni proizvodni družbi v Indoneziji in zadevni povezani trgovci v Singapurju sestavljajo en gospodarski subjekt ter da trgovci v tretji državi opravljajo vlogo izvoznega oddelka povezanih indonezijskih družb.
However, in both cases domestic sales, as well as some export sales to third countries, are invoiced directly by the manufacturer in Indonesia, and the traders in Singapore receive a specific commission.
Vendar v obeh primerih trgovinski račun za domačo prodajo in del izvoza v tretje države izda neposredno proizvajalec v Indoneziji, pri čemer trgovci v Singapurju prejmejo določeno provizijo.
For one of the Indonesian companies this commission is mentioned in a contract covering only export sales.
V primeru ene od indonezijskih družb je ta provizija navedena v pogodbi, ki zajema le izvoz.
Moreover, the traders in the third country also sell products manufactured by other producers, in one case also from unrelated producers.
Poleg tega trgovci v tretji državi prodajajo tudi izdelke drugih proizvajalcev, v enem primeru tudi nepovezanih proizvajalcev.
Both related traders in Singapore therefore clearly have functions which are similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Zato je jasno, da so funkcije obeh povezanih trgovcev v Singapurju podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizije.
Following definitive disclosure, the Indonesian government and one Indonesian exporting producer reiterated the claim of single economic entity referred to in the previous recital.
Po dokončnem razkritju sta indonezijska vlada in indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik ponovila svojo trditev glede enega gospodarskega subjekta iz prejšnje uvodne izjave.
They argued that in Matsushita v Council [4] the Court had previously held that the fact that the producer performs certain sales functions does not mean that a manufacturing company and a trading company cannot constitute a single economic entity.
Trdila sta, da je Sodišče v zadevi Matsushita proti Svetu [4] razsodilo, da dejstvo, da se proizvajalec ukvarja z nekaterimi funkcijami prodaje, ne pomeni, da družba za proizvodnjo in trgovska družba ne moreta sestavljati enega gospodarskega subjekta.
Furthermore, they also claimed that sales to third countries that are carried out by the exporter directly without involving the trader in Singapore only represent a small percentage of export sales and that in the Interpipe judgement [5] the Court of First Instance held that small volumes of direct sales by the producer did not support the claim that there was no single economic entity.
Trdila sta tudi, da prodaja v tretje države, ki jo izvedejo izvozniki neposredno brez trgovca v Singapurju, predstavlja le majhen odstotek izvoza in da je v sodbi Interpipe [5] Sodišče prve stopnje razsodilo, da majhen obseg neposredne prodaje s strani proizvajalca ne podpira trditve, da ni šlo za en sam gospodarski subjekt.
Finally, they brought forward that in Canon v Council [6] the fact that a sales subsidiary also acted as a distributor of products from other companies did not affect the finding of a single economic entity.
Trdila sta tudi, da v zadevi Canon proti Svetu [6] dejstvo, da je hčerinska družba prav tako delovala kot distributer izdelkov drugih družb, ni vplivala na ugotovitev, da je šlo za en sam gospodarski subjekt.
Even though in Matsushita v Council the Court held that the institutions were in that case entitled to find that a manufacturer, together with one or more distribution companies which it controls, forms an economic entity even though it performs certain sales functions itself, it does not necessarily follow that there is an obligation to always consider a producer and its related sales companies as a single economic entity.
Čeprav je Sodišče v zadevi Matsushita proti Svetu razsodilo, da so bile institucije v navedeni zadevi upravičene do razsodbe, da proizvajalec skupaj z enim ali več distribucijskimi družbami, ki jih nadzoruje, sestavlja gospodarski subjekt, čeprav sam opravlja nekatere funkcije prodaje, to ne pomeni nujno, da morata proizvajalec in njegove povezane prodajne družbe vedno predstavljati en gospodarski subjekt.
Furthermore, unlike the Indonesian exporting producer, the manufacturer in Matsushita v Council did not make any direct sales itself.
V nasprotju z indonezijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom proizvajalec v zadevi Matsushita proti Svetu sam ni opravljal neposredne prodaje.
Secondly in the Interpipe judgement, the fact that direct sales by the exporting producer represented only a limited percentage of the total sales volume to the Union was only one element analysed by the Court of First Instance.
V sodbi Interpipe je bilo dejstvo, da je neposredna prodaja proizvajalca izvoznika predstavljala le omejen odstotek celotnega obsega prodaje v EU, le en element, ki ga je analiziralo Sodišče prve stopnje.
More importantly, the Court stressed the fact that these direct sales were made to the new Member States for a transitional period only.
Predvsem pa je Sodišče poudarilo dejstvo, da je ta neposredna prodaja potekala v nove države članice v prehodnem obdobju.
In contrast, in this case, the available evidence indicates that the sales directly by the producer to certain third countries are not temporary but — at least in principle — structural, i.e. permanent.
Nasprotno pa v tem primeru dokazi, ki so na voljo, kažejo, da neposredna prodaja proizvajalca nekaterim tretjim državam ni začasna, temveč vsaj načeloma strukturna, tj. stalna.
Moreover, for each producer concerned, those sales represent a considerable percentage of its domestic sales.
Poleg tega navedena prodaja za vsakega zadevnega proizvajalca predstavlja velik odstotek njegove domače prodaje.
Finally, in Canon v Council the sales of the sales subsidiary of the exporting producer on the domestic market included other products that were only sold under a different brand name but had nevertheless all been produced by the exporting producer itself.
V zadevi Canon proti Svetu je prodaja hčerinskih družb proizvajalca izvoznika na domači trg vključevala druge izdelke, ki so bili prodani le pod drugo blagovno znamko, a jih je kljub temu proizvedel sam proizvajalec izvoznik.
The claim is therefore again rejected.
Trditev se zato ponovno zavrne.
One Indonesian company further claimed that, even if the concept of the single economic entity were not to be accepted, the Commission had imposed a ‘double margin’ by deducting from the export price to independent customers in the Union both a profit for the related importer in the Union as well as a commission for the related trader in the third country.
Ena od indonezijskih družb je nadalje trdila, da je Komisija, tudi če se koncept enega gospodarskega subjekta ne sprejme, uvedla „dvojno stopnjo“, tako da je od izvozne cene za neodvisne stranke v Uniji odštela dobiček povezanega uvoznika v Uniji in provizijo za povezanega trgovca v tretji državi.
However, the two items were taken into account for different purposes and were deducted separately.
Vendar sta se ti dve postavki upoštevali za različne namene in sta se odšteli ločeno.
As explained in recital 28, for export sales through related importers in the Union, the export price is constructed pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the price at which the imported products are first resold to an independent buyer.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 28, se izvozna cena za izvoz prek povezanih uvoznikov v Uniji računsko določi v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe na podlagi cene, po kateri se uvoženi izdelki prvič nadalje prodajo neodvisnemu kupcu.
In these cases an adjustment for the profit accruing shall be made so as to establish a reliable export price at the Union frontier level.
V teh primerih se opravi prilagoditev za nastali dobiček, da se določi zanesljiva izvozna cena na ravni meja Unije.
On the contrary, the commission for the related trader in the third country was deducted pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Nasprotno pa se je provizija za povezanega trgovca v tretji državi odštela v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.