natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the purpose of analysing price undercutting, the weighted average sales prices of the Union industry to unrelated customers on the Union market per product type, adjusted to an ex-works level, were compared to the corresponding weighted average prices of the imports from the countries concerned to the first independent customer on the Union market, established on a CIF basis with appropriate adjustments for post-importation costs and differences in the level of trade.
Za namene analize nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen se je tehtano povprečje prodajnih cen industrije Unije za nepovezane stranke na trgu Unije za vrsto izdelka, ki je prilagojeno na raven franko tovarna, primerjalo z ustreznim tehtanim povprečjem cen uvoza iz zadevnih držav za prvo neodvisno stranko na trgu Unije, določenim na podlagi CIF z ustreznimi prilagoditvami za stroške po uvozu in razlike v stopnji trgovine.
The comparison showed that, during the IP, the subsidised imports originating in the UAE sold in the Union undercut the Union industry’s prices by 3,2 %.
Primerjava je pokazala, da je v OP subvencionirani uvoz s poreklom iz ZAE, ki se prodaja v Uniji, nelojalno znižal prodajne cene industrije Unije za 3,2 %.
The subsidised imports originating in Iran sold in the Union undercut the prices of the Union industry by 3,0 %.
Subvencionirani uvoz s poreklom iz Pakistana, ki se prodaja v Uniji, je nelojalno znižal prodajne cene industrije Unije za 3,0 %.
The subsidised imports originating in Pakistan sold in the Union undercut the prices of the Union industry by 0,5 %.
Subvencionirani uvoz s poreklom iz Irana, ki se prodaja v Uniji, je nelojalno znižal prodajne cene industrije Unije za 0,5 %.
The weighted average undercutting margin of the countries concerned during the IP is 2,5 %.
Tehtana povprečna stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen zadevnih držav v OP je 2,5 %.
The Iranian exporter commented that its injury margin was overstated since the weighted average unit sales price established was understated due to an incorrect calculation of the amount of level of trade adjustment.
Iranski izvoznik je navedel, da je stopnja škode pretirana, ker je bila določena tehtana povprečna prodajna cena na enoto podcenjena zaradi nepravilnega izračuna zneska prilagoditve ravni trgovine.
As regards this claim it must be noted that the amount for the level of trade used in the provisional calculation was a fixed amount per tonne which is the commission charged by the cooperating importing agent and which represents around 1 % of the average CIF price.
V zvezi s to navedbo je treba opozoriti, da je bil znesek ravni trgovine, uporabljen v začasnem izračunu, fiksni znesek na tono, ki je provizija, ki jo zaračuna sodelujoči uvozni agent, in ki predstavlja približno 1 % povprečne cene CIF.
However, since no alternative quantification of the level of trade adjustment was proposed and no other information is available for such an adjustment, the claim is thus rejected.
Ker pa ni bila predlagana nobena druga količinska opredelitev prilagoditve ravni trgovine in za takšno prilagoditev ni na voljo drugih informacij, je trditev zavrnjena.
The same party also claimed that the 2 % rate taken for post-importation costs appeared to be understated.
Po trditvah iste strani se zdi, da je 2 % stopnja, ki se je upoštevala za stroške po uvozu, podcenjena.
It is reiterated in this regard that no importer cooperated in this investigation and it was not possible to verify the actual post-importation cost.
V zvezi s tem se poudarja, da v tej preiskavi ni sodeloval noben uvoznik in da ni bilo mogoče preveriti dejanskih stroškov po uvozu.
Thus, in absence of any other information available, the rate used in previous proceedings was applied.
Ker torej niso bile na voljo nobene druge informacije, se je uporabila stopnja iz prejšnjih postopkov.
Some interested parties claimed that injury did not exist since the sample was wrongly chosen and as a result no results could be extrapolated for the total Union industry.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da škode ni bilo, ker je bil vzorec napačno izbran, zaradi česar za celotno industrijo Unije ni bilo mogoče ekstrapolirati nobenega rezultata.
It was claimed that since one company (not in the sample) had indicated that it was using over 100 % of its capacity, this would be a clear sign of no injury.
Ker je ena družba (ki ni del vzorca) navedla, da je uporabljala več kot 100 % svoje zmogljivosti, so zainteresirane strani trdile, da je to jasen znak za neobstoj škode.
It is noted that the information submitted is an extract of this company’s submission to the stock exchange authorities in a third country and is not verified.
Ugotavlja se, da je predložena informacija izvleček iz predložitve dokumenta družbe organom borze v tretji državi in ni preverjena.
This information also does not square with the information on the file.
Ta informacija prav tako ni v skladu z informacijo v dokumentu.
Moreover, and in any event, the capacity utilisation of one EU producer alone cannot alter the findings of injury for the sampled EU producers and the other EU producers.
Poleg tega izkoriščenost zmogljivosti enega samega proizvajalca EU v nobenem primeru ne more spremeniti ugotovitev glede škode pri vzorčenih proizvajalcih EU in drugih proizvajalcih EU.
In the absence of any other claims or comments, recitals (218) to (237) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni drugih trditev ali pripomb, se uvodne izjave (218) do (237) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any specific comments, the conclusion on injury laid down in recitals (238) to (240) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo posebnih pripomb, se sklep o škodi iz uvodnih izjav (238) do (240) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any specific comments, recitals (241) to (245) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave (241) do (245) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Some interested parties claimed that any injury found would not be due to the subsidised imports, but that the low prices for PET in the EU reflect the worldwide cycle of the industry and that from September 2008 until June 2009 the PET prices in the EU followed the low prices of crude oil.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da katera koli ugotovljena škoda ne bi bila posledica subvencioniranega uvoza, vendar da nizke cene za PET v EU izražajo svetovni ciklus industrije ter da so cene PET v EU od septembra 2008 do junija 2009 sledile cenam surove nafte.
This volatility of world prices of crude oil cannot explain why imports of PET were subsidised and therefore undercut the Union producers’ prices.
S to spremenljivostjo svetovnih cen surove nafte se pojasnjuje, zakaj je bil uvoz PET subvencioniran in je zato nelojalno nižal prodajne cene proizvajalcev Unije.
It was precisely this undercutting, made possible due to the subsidies received, that depressed the prices of the Union industry, forcing EU producers to sell at a loss in order not to loose their clients.
Prav to nelojalno nižanje, verjetno zaradi prejetih subvencij, je nižalo cene industrije Unije, zaradi česar so bili proizvajalci EU prisiljeni v prodajo z izgubo, da ne bi izgubili svojih strank.
Since 2008, they were above 1 % and contributed with their low prices to the price suppression in the EU.
Od leta 2008 je bil uvoz nad 1 % in je s svojimi nizkimi cenami prispeval k oviranju dviga cen v EU.
Moreover, the conditions for cumulative assessment were fulfilled in this case and the effects of subsidised imports from all countries concerned could be assessed cumulatively.
Poleg tega so bili v tem primeru pogoji za kumulativno oceno izpolnjeni, pri čemer so se lahko učinki subvencioniranega uvoza iz vseh zadevnih držav ocenili kumulativno.
In addition, only one of the companies mentioned by the Iranian exporter was in the sample and the technical problems of this EU producer, limited from September to mid-October 2008, did not significantly influence the overall injury picture.
Le ena od družb, ki jo je navedel iranski izvoznik, je bila del vzorca in tehnične težave tega proizvajalca EU v omejenem obdobju od septembra do sredine oktobra 2008 niso bistveno vplivale na splošno sliko o škodi.
The same party reiterated that any injury found would be linked to the contraction in demand, especially during the IP which was marked by the global financial and economic crisis.
Ista stran je ponovno poudarila, da bi bila vsaka ugotovljena škoda povezana z zmanjševanjem povpraševanja, zlasti v OP, ki ga je zaznamovala svetovna finančna in gospodarska kriza.
However this party did not rebut the arguments given in recitals (254) to (256) of the provisional Regulation: that the economic downturn starting in the last quarter of 2008 cannot in any way diminish the damaging injurious effects of low priced subsidised imports in the EU market over the whole period considered and that, even though the shrinking demand was a factor contributing to the injury suffered, it did not break the causal link.
Ta stran kljub temu ni spodbijala trditev iz uvodnih izjav (254) do (256) začasne uredbe: da gospodarski upad od zadnje četrtine leta 2008 nikakor ne more zmanjšati škodljivih učinkov poceni subvencioniranega uvoza na trg EU v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju ter da kljub zmanjševanju povpraševanja kot dejavniku, ki je prispeval k nastali škodi, to ni prekinilo vzročne zveze.
It is further noted that those subsidised imports even increased their market share when demand contracted, i.e. from 7,6 % to 10,2 %, to the detriment of the EU producers.
Nadalje se ugotavlja, da je ta subvencionirani uvoz med zmanjševanjem povpraševanja celo povečal svoj tržni delež, to je s 7,6 % na 10,2 % v škodo proizvajalcem EU.
Some interested parties claimed that any injury was due to lack of investment by the EU PET producers and their consequent cost disadvantage vis-à-vis the exporters.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je bila vsaka škoda posledica premajhnega vlaganja proizvajalcev PET EU in posledične stroškovne neugodnosti v primerjavi z izvozniki.
It is recognised that PET is a capital intensive industry and that a certain level of investment is necessary to remain competitive in the mid-to-long term perspective.
Znano je, da je PET kapitalsko intenzivna industrija in da je potrebna določena raven naložb za ohranitev konkurenčnosti v srednjeročnem do dolgoročnem obdobju.
It is recalled that, as mentioned in recital (237) of the provisional Regulation, some of the sampled companies made important investments in 2006 and 2007, but there was only a minimal level of investment in 2008 and in the IP.
Opozarja se, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (237) začasne uredbe, da so nekatere vzorčene družbe leta 2006 in 2007 opravile pomembne naložbe, pri čemer je bila raven naložb leta 2008 in v OP minimalna.
It is noted in this regard that given the decreasing production and capacity utilisation rates in 2008 and in the IP combined with the sharply dropping market share of the Union producers, it would be unreasonable to expect any major investment in new capacities in the same period.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da bi bilo ob upoštevanju zmanjševanja proizvodnje in stopenj izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti leta 2008 in v OP skupaj z znatnim zmanjšanjem tržnega deleža proizvajalcev Unije nerazumno pričakovati kakršne koli večje naložbe v nove zmogljivosti v istem obdobju.
Consequently, it is concluded that the limited investment in 2008 and the IP did not materially contribute to the injury suffered by the Union industry but was rather a result thereof.
Zato se ugotavlja, da omejene naložbe leta 2008 in v OP niso znatno prispevale k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, vendar so bile njen rezultat.
In the absence of any further comments on causation, recitals (246) to (264) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z vzročno zvezo ni drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave (246) do (264) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure a significant number of EU converters and/or bottlers came forward and claimed that the Union interest analysis would not correctly reflect the arguments of the great number of cooperating users and that the findings contradicted the current economic environment.
Po začasnem razkritju se je javilo veliko število predelovalcev in/ali polnilcev EU ter trdilo, da analiza interesa Unije ne izraža pravilno trditev velikega števila sodelujočih uporabnikov in da so ugotovitve v nasprotju s trenutnim gospodarskim okoljem.
There was, however, no further substantiation or explanation.
Kljub temu ni sledila nobena utemeljitev ali razlaga.
The companies all requested a hearing, but only two companies of this group of users and one association of Italian bottlers actually came to the hearing.
Vse družbe so zahtevale zaslišanje, vendar so se ga udeležili le dve družbi iz te skupine uporabnikov in eno združenje italijanskih polnilcev.
More substantive comments were received from one cooperating EU converter (ALPLA), a group of processors (Caiba SA, Coca-Cola group, Danone Waters, Logoplaste, MFS Commodities, PepsiCO, Novara International and Silico Polymers), the cooperating import agent (GSI) and the association of plastic converters (EuPC).
Bistvenejše pripombe so poslali sodelujoči predelovalec EU (ALPLA), skupina predelovalcev (Caiba SA, skupina Coca-Cola, Danone Waters, Logoplaste, MFS Commodities, PepsiCO, Novara International in Silico Polymers), sodelujoči uvozni agent (GSI) in združenje predelovalcev plastike (EuPC).
All these parties strongly opposed the imposition of any measures.
Vse te strani so močno nasprotovale uvedbi kakršnih koli ukrepov.
Some interested parties claimed that the EU producers would (mis-)use trade defence instruments to shield the Union market and to set artificially high prices in the EU.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da bi proizvajalci EU (napačno) uporabljali instrumente trgovinske zaščite za zaščito trga Unije in umetno določitev visokih cen v EU.
These parties point to the existing anti-dumping and/or countervailing measures in place against India, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand and the People’s Republic of China.
Te strani poudarjajo obstoječe vzpostavljene protidampinške in/ali izravnalne ukrepe proti Indiji, Indoneziji, Južni Koreji, Maleziji, Tajvanu, Tajski in Ljudski republiki Kitajski.
However, it is noted that any company producing in the EU has a right to complain and to seek remedies in case it can demonstrate the existence of injurious subsidisation practices.
Vendar se ugotavlja, da ima vsaka družba, ki proizvaja v EU, pravico do pritožbe in uporabe pravnega sredstva, če lahko dokaže obstoj škodljivih praks subvencioniranja.
The fact that subsidisation and dumping practices have been found concerning numerous countries can possibly be explained by the fact that demand for this product increased tremendously since the ‛90s with usually double digit annual growth rates.
Dejstvo, da so bile prakse subvencioniranja in dampinga ugotovljene v več državah, se lahko verjetno razlaga z dejstvom, da se je povpraševanje po tem izdelku izrazito povečalo od 90-ih let z običajno dvomestno letno stopnjo rasti.
This attracted significant investments worldwide, leading to a structural worldwide oversupply for PET.
S tem so se privabile pomembne svetovne naložbe, kar je za PET pomenilo strukturni svetovni presežek.
It is also noted that some third countries have measures in place against several of the above-mentioned countries, underlining the existing structural problem.
Prav tako se ugotavlja, da imajo nekatere tretje države vzpostavljene ukrepe proti več zgoraj navedenim državam, s čimer se poudarja obstoječa strukturna težava.
Several interested parties reiterated that the Union producers would not be able to improve their performance in the long term since new investments in other third countries would come on-stream soon and decrease the artificially high prices in the EU.
Več zainteresiranih strani je poudarilo, da proizvajalci Unije niso zmožni izboljšati svoje učinkovitosti v dolgoročnem obdobju, ker bi se kmalu pojavile nove naložbe v druge tretje države in znižale umetno določene visoke cene v EU.
The investigation showed that a new investment that only recently came on-stream in Oman has increased its import volumes considerably in 2009 and it cannot be excluded that it might cause problems to the Union industry in the future.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so nove naložbe, ki so se nedavno pojavile v Omanu, leta 2009 bistveno povečale obseg uvoza te države, pri čemer ni mogoče izključiti, da bi to lahko povzročalo težave industriji Unije v prihodnosti.
However, as already indicated in recital (270) of the provisional Regulation, new investments that might come on-stream and might cause injury to the Union industry are no valid reason to deny legitimate protection in this proceeding.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi (270) začasne uredbe, morebitne nove naložbe, ki bi lahko povzročile škodo industriji Unije, niso veljaven razlog za zanikanje upravičene zaščite v tem postopku.
One interested party claimed that that the increase in the PET prices in the EU would allow only the EU producers with investment in third countries not subject to measures (Thailand, US, Russia) or other PET producers in third countries (South Korea) to improve their performance.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi lahko svojo učinkovitost na podlagi zvišanja cen PET v EU izboljšali le proizvajalci EU z naložbami v tretje države, za katere ukrepi ne veljajo (Tajska, Združene države, Rusija), ali drugi proizvajalci v tretjih državah (Južna Koreja).
Thus, the party argued, the short-term benefit for the EU producers would clearly be outweighed by the transfer of wealth to producers outside the EU.
Stran je trdila, da bi bil tako kratkoročni dobiček proizvajalcev EU jasno presežen s prenosom bogastva na proizvajalce zunaj EU.
In this respect it is noted that there is no evidence on file supporting the statement that any financial benefit that might be shifted to producers in third countries not subject to trade defence measures or to companies with a zero duty would outweigh the benefits to the Union industry.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da ni dokazov o dokumentu, ki bi podpirali izjavo o tem, da bi kakršna koli finančna korist, ki bi se lahko prenesla na proizvajalce v tretjih državah, za katere ukrepi trgovinske zaščite ne veljajo, ali družbe z ničelno stopnjo dajatve, prevladala nad ugodnostmi za industrijo Unije.
It was also claimed that Union producers only employ some 2000 people whereas PET processors and bottlers that would be highly affected by any duty employ around 20000 and 60000 people respectively.
Poleg tega je bilo navedeno, da proizvajalci Unije zaposlujejo le približno 2000 ljudi, medtem ko je predelovalcev in polnilcev PET, ki bi jih vsaka dajatev močno prizadela, približno 20000 in 60000.
It is noted that the employment created by PET producers is not marginal and the question whether the imposition of measures is against the Union interest as a whole cannot be reduced to a simple question of the number of people employed.
Ugotavlja se, da zaposlovanje, ki ga ustvarjajo proizvajalci PET, ni zanemarljivo, vprašanja, ali je uvedba ukrepov v nasprotju z interesi Unije kot celote, pa ni mogoče omejiti na enostavno vprašanje števila zaposlenih oseb.
In this regard it is also particularly relevant that the relevant users would likely not significantly be affected by the measures, taking into account the level of the duty as well as alternative sources of supply, as set out below in recitals (141) to (156).
V zvezi s tem je zlasti pomembno, da zadevnih uporabnikov ukrepi najverjetneje ne bi prizadeli, pri čemer se upoštevajo stopnja dajatve in tudi nadomestni viri dobave, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (141) do (156).
It is reiterated that no unrelated importer cooperated in this investigation.
Poudarja se, da v tej preiskavi ni sodeloval noben nepovezan uvoznik.
The cooperating agent strongly contested that the imposition of duties would not have a considerable impact on its business.
Sodelujoči agent je močno spodbijal trditev, da uvedba dajatev ne bo imela bistvenega vpliva na njegovo poslovanje.
The company claimed that while it was indeed working on a commission basis, the impact would be important since an important part of its business was linked to the countries concerned.
Družba je trdila, da je bil vpliv medtem, ko je družba dejansko poslovala na podlagi provizij, nepomemben, saj je bil pomemben del njenega poslovanja povezan z zadevnimi državami.
Should definitive measures be imposed, the commission obtained from the producers in the countries concerned would be affected given that the PET from the countries concerned could no longer compete with PET produced by other producers.
Če bi se uvedli dokončni ukrepi, bi to vplivalo na provizijo, ki se pobere pri proizvajalcih v zadevnih državah, ker PET iz zadevnih držav ne bi mogel več konkurirati s PET drugih proizvajalcev.
In view of the overall moderate duty level, it is not likely that PET sales from the countries concerned will be affected substantially.
Glede na splošno zmerno stopnjo dajatve ni verjetno, da bi bila prodaja PET iz drugih zadevnih držav bistveno prizadeta.
Moreover, the agent can in the medium term most probably switch to other sources of supply, namely to imports from Oman, US, Brazil, Mexico and the companies with a zero anti-dumping duty rate in South Korea.
Poleg tega lahko agent v srednjeročnem obdobju zelo verjetno preide na druge vire dobave, in sicer na uvoz iz Omana, Združenih držav, Brazilije, Mehike in družb z ničelno stopnjo protidampinške dajatve v Južni Koreji.
Sales of these exporting producers should put the agent in a position to compensate for any loss that may be incurred due to the imposition of measures.
S prodajo izvoznih proizvajalcev bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da agent nadomesti vsako izgubo, ki bi se lahko pojavila zaradi uvedbe ukrepov.
Consequently, the claim is rejected.
Zato se trditev zavrne.
One interested party claimed that it is not legitimate to protect the raw material suppliers of the EU PET producers at the expense of the packaging industry, the bottlers and the final consumers.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da zaščita dobaviteljev surovin proizvajalcem PET EU na račun pakirne industrije, polnilcev in končnih potrošnikov ni upravičena.
It is noted that the analysis of the impact of measures on the supplying industry is in conformity with Article 31 of the basic Regulation.
Ugotavlja se, da je analiza učinka ukrepov na dobavno industrijo v skladu s členom 31 osnovne uredbe.
It is a standard practice to carry out such an analysis, in particular when there is a strong dependency between raw material suppliers and Union producers.
Standardna praksa je, da se taka analiza izvaja, zlasti če obstaja močna odvisnost med dobavitelji surovin in proizvajalci Unije.
In the absence of any other comments in this regard, recitals (265) to (279) of the provisional Regulation are hereby definitively confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave (265) do (279) začasne uredbe dokončno potrdijo.
It is reiterated that PET used in the production of bottle pre-forms amounts to between 70 % and 80 % of the total cost of production for converters.
Poudarja se, da znaša strošek PET, ki se uporablja v proizvodnji predform za steklenice, med 70 % in 80 % vseh stroškov proizvodnje za predelovalce.
It is therefore a critical cost component for these companies.
Zato je kritični element stroškov teh družb.
Some interested parties indicated that the EU packaging industry is constantly challenged by the requirements of the bottle fillers for new designs and more environmental friendly packaging.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so navedle, da pakirno industrijo EU stalno spodbijajo zahteve polnilcev po novih oblikah in bolj okolju prijaznem pakiranju.