natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Meridian Airways were heard by the services of the Commission and the competent authorities of Belgium, Germany and the United Kingdom on 12 August 2010.
Službe Komisije ter pristojni organi Belgije, Nemčije in Združenega kraljestva so 12. avgusta 2010 zaslišali prevoznika Meridian Airways.
These consultations did not provide satisfactory solutions to address the identified safety deficiencies in the short term.
Ta posvetovanja niso zagotovila zadovoljivih rešitev, ki bi v kratkem času odpravile ugotovljene varnostne pomanjkljivosti.
The competent authorities of the Republic of Ghana declined to attend the meeting.
Pristojni organi Republike Gane so zavrnili prisotnost na srečanju.
The Commission takes note of the commitment by the carrier to continue with its corrective action plan.
Komisija je seznanjena z zavezanostjo prevoznika, da nadaljuje s korekcijskim akcijskim načrtom.
The progress made by the carrier with the implementation of the corrective action plan together with any other developments should be examined at the next meeting of the Air Safety Committee.
Napredek, ki ga je dosegel z izvajanjem načrta korekcijskih ukrepov, skupaj z ostalim razvojem, je treba preučiti na naslednjem srečanju Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Meridian Airways does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Na podlagi skupnih meril se ocenjuje, da Meridian Airways ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
The air carrier should be subject to a ban to all its operations and should be included in Annex A.
Za letalskega prevoznika mora veljati prepoved vseh njegovih dejavnosti in treba ga je vključiti v Prilogo A.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Airlift International (GH) Ltd certified in the Republic of Ghana.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih letalskega prevoznika Airlift International (GH) Ltd, certificiranega v Republiki Gani.
These deficiencies have been identified by the United Kingdom during a ramp inspection performed under the SAFA programme [6].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanjem na ploščadi v okviru programa SAFA [6] ugotovilo Združeno kraljestvo.
The competent authorities of the United Kingdom communicated to the Commission that it adopted on 29 July 2010 an immediate operating ban on the whole fleet of Airlift International (GH) Ltd, due to the number of serious and major findings observed during the ramp inspection as well as the crew's disregard for the applicable flight time limitations.
Pristojni organi Združenega kraljestva so sporočili Komisiji, da so 29. julija 2010 sprejeli takojšnjo prepoved opravljanja letov za celotno floto Airlift International (GH) Ltd zaradi številnih resnih in pomembnih ugotovitev, ki so jih opazili med preverjanjem na ploščadi, ter zaradi neupoštevanja veljavnih časovnih omejitev letenja s strani posadke.
In addition, the United Kingdom submitted on 29 July 2010 to the Commission a request to update the Community list in accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, and as prescribed by Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 473/2006, in view of imposing an operating ban to the European Union on the whole fleet of Airlift International (GH) Ltd.
Poleg tega je Združeno kraljestvo 29. julija 2010 Komisiji predložilo zahtevo za posodobitev seznama Skupnosti v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 in kot določa člen 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 473/2006 z namenom, da se prepoved opravljanja letov v Evropski uniji razširi na celotno floto Airlift International (GH) Ltd.
Pursuant to the request of the United Kingdom, the Commission consulted the air carrier and the competent authorities in charge of its oversight.
Komisija se je glede na zahtevo Združenega kraljestva posvetovala z letalskim prevoznikom in pristojnimi organi, ki so odgovorni za njegov nadzor.
These consultations did not provide assurance that the identified safety deficiencies had been removed and that an adequate action plan had been implemented in order to prevent their reoccurrence.
Ta posvetovanja niso dala zagotovila, da so bile ugotovljene varnostne pomanjkljivosti odpravljene in da se je izvajal ustrezen akcijski načrt za preprečitev njihovega ponavljanja.
Airlift International (GH) Ltd and the competent authorities of Ghana were heard by the services of the Commission and the competent authorities of Germany and the United Kingdom on 18 August 2010.
Službe Komisije ter pristojni organi Nemčije in Združenega kraljestva so 18. avgusta 2010 zaslišali prevoznika Airlift International (GH) Ltd in pristojne organe Gane.
The air carrier provided documents showing they were permitted to operate four aircraft of type DC8-63F (registration marks 9G-FAB, 9G-TOP, 9G-RAC, 9G-SIM) but that 9G-FAB and 9G-SIM were in storage.
Letalski prevoznik je predložil dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je imel dovoljenje za opravljanje letov s štirimi zrakoplovi vrste DC8-63F (z registrskimi oznakami: 9G-FAB, 9G-TOP, 9G-RAC, 9G-SIM), 9G-FAB in 9G-SIM pa so bili v skladišču.
The air carrier explained the safety processes they have in place but were unable to provide a clear explanation of why aircraft 9G-RAC, which had been brought out of storage to operate the flight to the UK, had failed to meet international standards.
Letalski prevoznik je obrazložil postopke za varnost, ki veljajo, ni pa uspel pojasniti, zakaj zrakoplov 9G-RAC, ki je bil vzet iz skladišča za opravljanje letov v Združeno kraljestvo, ni izpolnjeval mednarodnih standardov.
The air carrier briefed that it had recently improved its quality and safety management arrangements and was currently undergoing a review of their safety management processes.
Letalski prevoznik je povzel, da je pred kratkim izboljšal svoje ureditve za vodenje kakovosti in varnosti ter da trenutno pregleduje postopke za upravljanje varnosti.
Taking into account the actions taken by the air carrier to date, and on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Airlift International (GH) Ltd should be included in Annex B to allow operations exclusively with the aircraft with registration mark 9G-TOP.
Ob upoštevanju ukrepov, ki jih je letalski doslej sprejel, in na osnovi skupnih meril se ocenjuje, da je treba prevoznika Airlift International (GH) Ltd vključiti v Prilogo B, da se dovoli opravljanje letov samo zrakoplovom z registrsko oznako 9G-TOP.
The Commission will review the situation at the next meeting of the Air Safety Committee,
Komisija bo pregledala stanje na naslednjem srečanju Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu –
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EU) No 590/2010 (OJ L 170, 6.6.2010, p. 9).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (EU) št. 590/2010 (UL L 170, 6.6.2010, str. 9).
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE EU [1] [1]
SEZNAM LETALSKIH PREVOZNIKOV, ZA KATERE VELJA PREPOVED VSEH LETOV V EU [1] [1]
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE EU [1] [1]Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if different)
SEZNAM LETALSKIH PREVOZNIKOV, ZA KATERE VELJAJO OMEJITVE PRI OPRAVLJANJU LETOV V EU [1] [1]Naziv pravne osebe letalskega prevoznika, kot je naveden na spričevalu letalskega prevoznika (in njegovo tržno ime, če je drugačno)
All fleet with the exception of: 2 aircraft of type Tu-204
Vsa flota razen: 2 zrakoplovov vrste Tu- 204
All fleet with the exception of: 1 aircraft of type DC8-63F
Vsa flota razen: 1 zrakoplova vrste DC8-63F
All fleet with the exception of: 9G-TOP
Vsa flota razen: 9G-TOP
14 aircraft of type A300, 8 aircraft of type A310, 1 aircraft B737,
14 zrakoplovov vrste A300, 8 zrakoplovov vrste A310, 1 zrakoplov vrste B737;
Iran Air is allowed to operate to the European Union using the specific aircraft under the conditions set out in recital (69) Regulation (EU) No 590/2010, OJ L 170, 6.7.2010, p. 15.
Iran Air lahko leti v Evropsko unijo le s posebnimi zrakoplovi in pod pogoji, določenimi v uvodni izjavi (69) Uredbe (EU) št. 590/2010, UL L 170, 6.7.2010, str. 15.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 792/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 792/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 September 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 8. septembra 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 793/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 793/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 September 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 9. septembra 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 794/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 794/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 789/2010 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 789/2010 [4].
OJ L 236, 7.9.2010, p. 3.
UL L 236, 7.9.2010, str. 3.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 9 September 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 9. septembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 795/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 795/2010
of 9 September 2010
z dne 9. septembra 2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 September 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 10. septembra 2010.
Done at Brussels, 9 September 2010.
V Bruslju, 9. septembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 796/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 796/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 794/2010 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 794/2010 [4].
OJ L 238, 9.9.2010, p. 5.
UL L 238, 9.9.2010, str. 5.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 10 September 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 10. septembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 797/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 797/2010
not fixing a minimum selling price in response to the sixth individual invitation to tender for the sale of butter within the tendering procedure opened by Regulation (EU) No 446/2010
o nedoločitvi najnižje prodajne cene za prodajo masla za 6. posamični razpis v okviru razpisnega postopka za zbiranje ponudb na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 446/2010
In the light of the tenders received for the sixth individual invitation to tender, no minimum selling price should be fixed.
Glede na ponudbe, prejete na 6. posamičnem razpisu, se najnižja prodajna cena ne določi.
For the sixth individual invitation to tender for selling of butter within the tendering procedure opened by Regulation (EU) No 446/2010, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 7 September 2010, no minimum selling price for butter shall be fixed.
Na 6. posamičnem razpisu za prodajo masla v okviru razpisnega postopka za zbiranje ponudb na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 446/2010, katerega rok za vložitev ponudb je pretekel dne 7. septembra 2010, se najnižja prodajna cena masla ne določi.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 798/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 798/2010
fixing the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the sixth individual invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Regulation (EU) No 447/2010
o določitvi najnižje prodajne cene za posneto mleko v prahu na 6. posamičnem razpisu v okviru razpisnega postopka za zbiranje ponudb na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 447/2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 447/2010 [2] has opened the sales of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure, in accordance with the conditions provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 of 11 December 2009 laying down common detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards buying-in and selling of agricultural products under public intervention [3].
Z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 447/2010 [2] se začenja postopek javnega razpisa za prodajo posnetega mleka v prahu v skladu s pogoji iz Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 1272/2009 z dne 11. decembra 2009 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 glede odkupa in prodaje kmetijskih proizvodov z javno intervencijo [3].
In the light of the tenders received for the sixth individual invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.
Glede na ponudbe, prispele na 6. posamični razpis, je treba določiti najnižjo prodajno ceno.
For the sixth individual invitation to tender for selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Regulation (EU) No 447/2010, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 7 September 2010, the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder shall be EUR 211,00/100 kg.
Na 6. posamičnem razpisu za prodajo posnetega mleka v prahu v okviru razpisnega postopka za zbiranje ponudb na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 447/2010, katerega rok za vložitev ponudb je pretekel dne 7. septembra 2010, je najnižja prodajna cena posnetega mleka v prahu 211,00 EUR/100 kg.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 799/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 799/2010
of 10 September 2010
z dne 10. septembra 2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 September 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 11. septembra 2010.
Done at Brussels, 10 September 2010.
V Bruslju, 10. septembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 800/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 800/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 796/2010 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 796/2010 [4].
OJ L 239, 10.9.2010, p. 3.
UL L 239, 10.9.2010, str. 3.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 11 September 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 11. septembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 801/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 801/2010
implementing Article 10(3) of Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the flag State criteria
o izvajanju člena 10(3) Direktive 2009/16/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z merili države zastave
Having regard to Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on port State control [1], and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/16/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o pomorski inšpekciji države pristanišča [1] in zlasti člena 10(3) Direktive,
Flag State performance is one of the generic parameters determining the risk profile of ships.
Uspešnost države zastave je pomemben vrstni parameter, ki določa rizični profil ladij.
In order to assess the risk profile of a ship, the detention rate within the Union and within the region covered by the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control (Paris MoU) should be taken into account.
Da bi ocenili rizični profil ladje, je treba upoštevati delež zadržanj v Uniji in na območju, ki ga pokriva Pariški memorandum o soglasju glede nadzora, ki ga opravlja inšpekcija za varnost plovbe („Pariški memorandum“).
It is necessary to build upon the expertise acquired through the application of the Paris MoU with regard to the methodology to be used for assessing flag State performance.
V zvezi z metodologijo za ocenjevanje uspešnosti države zastave je potrebno upoštevati strokovno znanje, pridobljeno z uporabo Pariškega memoranduma.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships,
Ukrepi, določeni v tej uredbi, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij –
Categorization of flag States based on the detention rates
Kategorizacija držav zastav na podlagi deležev zadržanj
With a view to establishing flag State performance within the meaning of Directive 2009/16/EC, flag States shall be classified into black, grey or white lists, adopted in accordance with the Paris MoU on the basis of the total inspections and detentions over a three year period.
Da bi ugotovili uspešnost države zastave v smislu Direktive 2009/16/ES, se države zastav razvrščajo na črne, sive ali bele sezname, sprejete v skladu s Pariškim memorandumom na podlagi skupnega števila inšpekcijskih pregledov in zadržanj v obdobju treh let.
Additionally, flag States listed in the black list shall be divided into very high, high, medium to high or medium risk depending on their detention rate.
Poleg tega se države zastav, uvrščene na črni seznam, glede na njihov delež zadržanja delijo na izjemno rizične, zelo rizične, srednje do zelo ali srednje rizične.
The classification shall be updated yearly.
Razvrstitev se posodablja vsako leto.
Classification of a flag State into the black, grey or white list requires a minimum of thirty port state control inspections.
Uvrstitev države zastave na črni, sivi ali beli seznam zahteva najmanj trideset inšpekcijskih pregledov pomorske inšpekcije.
The methodology and formulas to be used to categorize the flag States shall comply with the flag State criteria as set out in the Annex.
Metodologija in formule, ki se uporabljajo za kategorizacijo držav zastav, so v skladu z merili, povezanimi z državo zastave, ki so navedena v Prilogi.
Flag State performance based on the IMO audit
Uspešnost države zastave na podlagi pregleda IMO
The compliance referred to in point (c) (iii) of Part I.1 of Annex I to Directive 2009/16/EC required for ships to be considered as posing a lower risk, shall be regarded as demonstrated when the Commission receives a written confirmation from the flag State that a final audit report has been completed and where relevant, a corrective action plan submitted.
Upoštevanje iz točke (c)(iii) dela I.1 Priloge I k Direktivi 2009/16/ES, ki se zahteva za opredelitev ladij kot manj rizičnih, se šteje za izkazano, ko Komisija prejme pisno potrdilo od države zastave, da je končno poročilo o pregledu zaključeno in da je po potrebi predložen načrt za odpravo nepravilnosti.
Audits carried out before 17 June 2009 shall be taken into account equally.
Pregledi, opravljeni pred 17. junijem 2009, se enakovredno upoštevajo.
Flag State Criteria
Merila, povezana z državo zastave
(as referred to in Article 10(3)(a) of Directive 2009/16/EC)
(kakor je navedeno v členu 10(3)(a) Direktive 2009/16/ES)
Flag State performance shall be calculated using a standard formula for statistical calculations in which certain values are fixed.
Uspešnost države zastave se izračuna na podlagi standardne formule za statistične izračune, v kateri so nekatere vrednosti stalne.
The black to grey and grey to white limits are defined by the following formulas:
Meje med črno in sivo ter sivo in belo določata naslednji formuli:
μblack_to_grey
μčrno_sivo
μwhite_to_grey
μbelo_sivo
N is the number of inspections
N število inšpekcijskih pregledov,
p is the allowable detention limit
p dovoljena meja zadrževanja,
z is the critical value of the normal distribution (1,645 for certainty level of 95 %)
z kritična vrednost normalne distribucije (1,645 za 95-odstotno raven zanesljivosti).
The formulas set out in point 1 shall provide the allowed number of detentions for either the black or the white list.
Formule iz točke 1 zagotavljajo dovoljeno število zadržanj za črni ali beli seznam.
A number of detentions above the black to grey limit means worse than average and is to be subsequently listed under the black list, while a number of detentions below the white to grey limit means better than average and is to be subsequently listed under the white list.
Število zadržanj nad mejo med črnim in sivim pomeni slabše od povprečja in se mora posledično uvrstiti na črni seznam, število zadržanj pod mejo med belim in sivim pa pomeni boljše od povprečja in se mora posledično uvrstiti na beli seznam.
When the amount of detentions for a particular flag State is positioned between the two, the flag State shall be listed under the grey list.
Če se število zadržanj za določeno državo zastave postavi med ti dve meji, se država zastave uvrsti na sivi seznam.
In order to compare the performance of flag States listed on the black, grey or white lists, the calculation is repeated adjusting p in the formulas set out in Point 1.
Za primerjavo uspešnosti držav zastav iz črnega, sivega ali belega seznama se izračun ponovi s prilagoditvijo p v formulah iz točke 1.
In order to make flag State performance comparable, the excess factor (EF) shall be used.
Da bi dosegli primerljivost uspešnosti držav zastav, se uporablja faktor presežka (EF).
The EF is an indication of the number of times that p has to be altered and recalculated until the number of detentions for a flag State equals the limits.
EF kaže, kolikokrat je treba spremeniti p in ponovno izračunati, da se število zadržanj za državo zastave izenači z mejami.
Any 3 % increment or decrement in p corresponds to one whole EF-point.
Vsako 3 % povečanje ali zmanjšanje p ustreza eni celi točki EF.
For flag States categorized in the grey list, the EF shall be calculated using the following formula:
Za države zastav, kategorizirane na sivi seznam, se EF izračuna po naslednji formuli:
EF = Flags’ Detentions – μwhite_to_grey
EF = Zadržanja zastav – μbelo_sivo
The following EF values shall be considered in order to sort black listed flag States into very high, high, medium to high or medium risk:
Za razporejanje držav zastav, uvrščenih na črni seznam, v izjemno rizične, zelo rizične, srednje do zelo rizične ali srednje rizične se upoštevajo naslednje vrednosti EF:
EF = 4,01 and more means very high risk
EF = 4,01 in več pomeni izjemno rizično
EF = 3,01 to 4,00 means high risk
EF = 3,01 do 4,00 pomeni zelo rizično
EF = 2,01 to 3,00 means medium to high risk
EF = 2,01 do 3,00 pomeni srednje do zelo rizično
EF = 1,01 to 2,00 means medium risk.
EF = 1,01 do 2,00 pomeni srednje rizično
Commission Regulation (EU) No 802/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 802/2010
implementing Article 10(3) and Article 27 of Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards company performance
o izvajanju člena 10(3) in člena 27 Direktive 2009/16/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede uspešnosti družb
Having regard to Directive 2009/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on port State control [1], and in particular Article 10(3) and Article 27 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/16/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o pomorski inšpekciji države pristanišča [1] in zlasti člena 10(3) in člena 27 Direktive,
Company performance is one of the generic parameters determining the risk profile of a ship.
Uspešnost družbe je eden od splošnih parametrov, ki določa rizični profil ladje;
With a view to determining the performance of companies within the meaning of Directive 2009/16/EC, it is necessary that, when inspecting a ship, inspectors record the IMO number assigned to a company.
Pri opredeljevanju uspešnosti družb v smislu Direktive 2009/16/ES, morajo inšpektorji pri inšpekcijskem pregledu ladje zabeležiti številko IMO, ki je dodeljena družbi.
In order to assess company performance, the deficiency and detention rates of all ships in a company’s fleet, which have been subject to an inspection within the Union and within the region covered by the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on port State control (Paris MoU), should be taken into account.
Da bi ocenili uspešnost družbe, bi bilo treba upoštevati stopnje pomanjkljivosti in zadržanj vseh ladij v floti družbe, na katerih je bil opravljen inšpekcijski pregled v Uniji in na območju, ki ga pokriva Pariški memorandum o soglasju glede nadzora, ki ga opravlja inšpekcija za varnost plovbe (Pariški memorandum).
It is necessary to build upon the expertise acquired through the application of the Paris MoU with regard to the methodology used for assessing company performance.
V zvezi z metodologijo za ocenjevanje uspešnosti družbe je potrebno upoštevati strokovno znanje, pridobljeno z uporabo Pariškega memoranduma.