natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the requirements that AIFMs have to comply with when investing in such securitisation instruments; to specify administrative and accounting procedures, control and safeguard arrangements for electronic data processing and adequate internal control mechanisms; to specify the procedures for the proper valuation of the assets and the calculation of the net asset value per unit or share of the AIF, the professional guarantees the external valuer must be able to provide, and the frequency for valuation appropriate for open-ended AIFs.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi zato, da se podrobneje opredelijo zahteve, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati UAIS pri vlaganju v takšne instrumente listinjenja; za opredelitev upravnih in računovodskih postopkov, nadzora in varnostne ureditve za elektronsko obdelavo podatkov in ustreznih notranjih mehanizmov nadzora; za opredelitev postopkov za ustrezno vrednotenje sredstev in izračun čiste vrednosti sredstev na enoto ali delež AIS; strokovnih jamstev, ki bi jih zunanji cenilec moral biti sposoben predložiti; in pogostosti vrednotenja, ki je ustrezna za odprte AIS.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the conditions subject to which the delegation of AIFM functions should be approved and the conditions subject to which the AIFM has delegated its functions to the extent that it becomes a letter-box entity and can no longer be considered to be the manager of the AIF; as regards depositaries, to specify the criteria for assessing that the prudential regulation and supervision of third countries where the depositaries are established have the same effect as Union law and are effectively enforced, the particulars that need to be included in the standard agreement, the conditions for performing the depositary functions, including the type of financial instruments that should be included in the scope of the depositary’s custody duties, the conditions subject to which the depositary may exercise its custody duties over financial instruments registered with a central depositary and the conditions subject to which the depositary should safekeep the financial instruments issued in a nominative form and registered with an issuer or a registrar, the due diligence duties of depositaries, the segregation obligation, the conditions subject to and circumstances in which financial instruments held in custody should be considered as lost, what is to be understood by external events beyond reasonable control, the consequences of which would have been unavoidable despite all reasonable efforts to the contrary, and the conditions subject to and circumstances in which there is an objective reason to contract a discharge of liability.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev pogojev, pod katerimi se odobri prenos nalog UAIS, in pogojev, pod katerimi je UAIS prenesel svoje naloge do te stopnje, da ga ni več mogoče obravnavati kot upravitelja AIS, saj ima le še vlogo „poštnega predala“; kar zadeva depozitarje, za opredelitev meril za oceno, da so pravila varnega in skrbnega poslovanja in nadzor tretjih držav, kjer imajo depozitarji sedež, enakovredne pravu Unije in se učinkovito izvršujejo, podrobnosti, ki jih je treba vključiti v standardni sporazum; pogojev za izvrševanje nalog depozitarja, vključno z vrstami finančnih instrumentov, ki bi se morale vključiti med depozitarjeve naloge hrambe, pogojev, pod katerimi lahko depozitar izvršuje svoje naloge hrambe finančnih instrumentov, ki so registrirani pri centralnem depozitarju, in pogojev, pod katerimi bi depozitar moral hraniti nominalne finančne instrumente, ki so registrirani pri izdajatelju ali registratorju; dolžnosti primerne skrbnosti depozitarjev; obveznosti ločevanja; pogojev in okoliščin, v katerih se finančni instrumenti, ki se hranijo, štejejo za izgubljene; kaj razumemo pod zunanje dogodke, katerih razumno ni mogoče nadzorovati, posledice pa bi bile ne glede na vsa razumna prizadevanja neizogibne; pa tudi pogojev in okoliščin, v katerih obstaja objektivni razlog za sporazum o oprostitvi odgovornosti.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the content and format of the annual report that AIFMs have to make available for each AIF they manage and to specify the disclosure obligations of AIFMs to investors and reporting requirements to competent authorities as well as their frequency.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za podrobno opredelitev vsebine in oblike letnega poročila, ki ga morajo UAIS dati na voljo za vsak AIS, ki ga upravljajo, ter obveznosti razkritja informacij s strani UAIS vlagateljem in obveznosti poročanja UAIS pristojnim organom kot tudi njihove pogostnosti.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify when leverage is considered to be employed on a substantial basis and the principles competent authorities should use when considering imposing limits to the level of leverage that an AIFM can apply.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za podrobno opredelitev kdaj se šteje, da je finančni vzvod znatno uporabljen in za podrobno opredelitev načel, ki bi jih morali pristojni organi upoštevati, ko obravnavajo možnost naložitve omejitev ravni finančnega vzvoda, ki bi ga lahko uporabil UAIS.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the cooperation arrangements in relation to non-EU AIFMs and/or non-EU AIFs in order to design a common framework to facilitate the establishment of those cooperation arrangements with third countries.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za podrobno opredelitev sporazumov o sodelovanju v zvezi z ne-EU UAIS in/ali ne-EU AIS, da se določi skupni okvir, ki bi spodbudil ustanovitev dogovorov o sodelovanju s tretjimi državami.
Delegated acts should also be adopted to specify the content of exchange of information regarding AIFMs between competent authorities and the provision of certain information to ESMA.
Delegirane akte bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi za opredelitev vsebine izmenjave informacij v zvezi z UAIS med pristojnimi organi in posredovanjem določenih informacij ESMA.
Depending on the advice of ESMA in this regard and the criteria set out in this Directive, a delegated act should also be adopted in order to extend the passport to EU AIFMs marketing non-EU AIFs in the Union and to non-EU AIFMs managing and/or marketing AIFs in the Union, and another delegated act should be adopted to terminate the application of national private placement regimes in this regard.
Ob upoštevanju priporočila ESMA in meril, določenih v tej direktivi, bi bilo treba delegirani akt sprejeti tudi zato, da se evropska enotna licenca razširi na EU UAIS, ki tržijo ne-EU AIS v Uniji, in na ne-EU UAIS, ki upravljajo oziroma tržijo AIS v Uniji, drugi delegirani akt pa bi bilo treba sprejeti zato, da v zvezi s tem prenehajo veljati nacionalni sistemi zasebnega plasiranja.
The European Parliament and the Council should have 3 months from the date of notification to object to a delegated act.
(86) Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala imeti na voljo tri mesece od datuma uradnega obvestila za nasprotovanje delegiranemu aktu.
It should also be possible for the European Parliament and the Council to inform the other institutions of their intention not to raise objections.
Prav tako bi moralo biti omogočeno, da Evropski parlament in Svet lahko obvestita druge institucije, da ne nameravata nasprotovati.
Such early approval of delegated acts is particularly important where deadlines need to be met, for example to allow Member States to transpose delegated acts within the transposition period laid down in this Directive, where relevant.
Taka hitra odobritev delegiranih aktov je posebej pomembna, ko je treba spoštovati roke, na primer zato, da se, kjer je to ustrezno, državam članicam omogoči, da prenesejo delegirane akte v obdobju prenosa iz te direktive.
In the Declaration on Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, the Conference took note of the Commission’s intention to consult experts appointed by the Member States in the preparation of draft delegated acts in the financial services area, in accordance with its established practice.
V skladu z izjavo o členu 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki je priložena Sklepni listini medvladne konference, na kateri je bila sprejeta Lizbonska pogodba, se je konferenca seznanila z namero Komisije, da se glede priprave delegiranih aktov na področju finančnih storitev v skladu z njeno ustaljeno prakso posvetuje s strokovnjaki, ki jih imenujejo države članice.
2 years after the deadline for transposition of this Directive, ESMA should issue an opinion on the functioning of the passport then in force and on the functioning of national private placement regimes.
Dve leti po roku za prenos te direktive izda ESMA mnenje o delovanju enotne licence, ki je veljala v tem obdobju, ter o delovanju nacionalnih sistemov zasebnega plasiranja.
It should also issue advice on the extension of the passport to EU AIFMs marketing non-EU AIFs in the Union and to non-EU AIFMs managing and/or marketing AIFs in the Union.
Prav tako bi moral izdati mnenje o razširitvi enotne licence na EU UAIS, ki tržijo ne-EU AIS v Uniji, ter na ne-EU UAIS, ki upravljajo oziroma tržijo AIS v Uniji.
The Commission should adopt a delegated act within 3 months after having received that opinion and advice from ESMA and taking into account the criteria listed in, and the objectives of, this Directive, inter alia, regarding the internal market, investor protection and the effective monitoring of systemic risk, specifying the date when the rules relating to the extension of the passport provided for in this Directive should become applicable in all Member States.
Komisija bi morala sprejeti delegirane akte v treh mesecih po tem, ko je prejela to mnenje in nasvete ESMA, ter ob upoštevanju meril in ciljev iz te direktive, med drugim o notranjem trgu, zaščiti vlagateljev in učinkovitem spremljanju sistemskega tveganja, pri čemer določi datum, ko bi se morala pravila te direktive glede razširitve licence začeti uporabljati v vseh državah članicah.
At the April 2009 summit in London, G20 Leaders agreed that hedge funds or their managers should be registered and should be required to disclose appropriate information on an ongoing basis to supervisors or regulators.
Voditelji držav G20 so se aprila 2009 na zasedanju v Londonu dogovorili, da bi bilo treba registrirati hedge sklade ali njihove upravitelje ter od njih zahtevati, da redno razkrivajo ustrezne informacije nadzornikom ali zakonodajalcem.
They should be subject to oversight to ensure that they have adequate risk management.
Treba jih je nadzirati zato, da se zagotovi, da imajo ustrezno obvladovanje tveganja.
In June 2010, G20 Leaders in Toronto reaffirmed their commitment and also committed to accelerate the implementation of strong measures to improve transparency and regulatory oversight of hedge funds in an internationally consistent and non-discriminatory way.
Voditelji držav G20 so junija 2010 v Torontu ponovno izrazili to zavezanost, zavezali pa so se tudi k hitrejšemu izvajanju trdnih ukrepov za izboljšanje preglednosti in regulativnega nadzora nad hedge skladi, brez diskriminacije in usklajenih na mednarodni ravni.
In order to support the G20 objectives, the International Organization of Securities Commissions issued high level principles of hedge fund oversight in June 2009 to guide the development of internationally consistent regulation in this area.
Da bi Mednarodna organizacija nadzornikov trga vrednostnih papirjev podprla cilje skupine G20, je junija 2009 izdala načela na visoki ravni za nadzor nad hedge skladi, da bi na tem področju usmerjalo pripravo mednarodno usklajene ureditve.
On 16 September 2010 the European Council agreed on the need for Europe to promote its interest and values more assertively and in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit in the context of the Union’s external relations and to take steps to, inter alia, secure greater market access for European business and deepen regulatory cooperation with major trade partners.
Evropski svet se je 16. septembra 2010 dogovoril, da mora Evropa v okviru zunanjih odnosov Unije svoje interese in vrednote uveljavljati odločneje in v duhu recipročnosti in vzajemnih koristi ter da mora med drugim sprejeti ukrepe za zagotovitev večjega dostopa do trga za evropska podjetja in za poglobitev regulativnega sodelovanja z glavnimi trgovinskimi partnericami.
The Commission will endeavour to ensure that these commitments are implemented in a similar way by the Union’s international partners.
Komisija si bo prizadevala, da bodo mednarodni partnerji Unije na podoben način uresničevali te zaveze.
3 years after the entry into force of the delegated act pursuant to which the passport is to apply to all AIFMs, ESMA should issue an opinion on the functioning of the passport then in force and on the functioning of national private placement regimes.
Tri leta po začetku veljavnosti delegiranega akta, v skladu s katerim bo enotna licenca začela veljati za vse UAIS, izda ESMA mnenje o delovanju enotne licence, veljavne v tem obdobju, ter o delovanju nacionalnih sistemov zasebnega plasiranja.
It should also issue advice on the termination of those national regimes.
Prav tako bi morala izdati mnenje o ukinitvi takšnih nacionalnih sistemov.
The Commission should adopt a delegated act within 3 months of receipt of the opinion and advice from ESMA, taking into account the criteria listed in, and the objectives of, this Directive, inter alia, relating to the internal market, investor protection and the effective monitoring of systemic risk, specifying the date when the national regimes referred to in this Directive should be brought to an end in all Member States.
Komisija bi morala sprejeti delegirani akt tri mesece po sprejetju nasveta in mnenja ESMA, ter ob upoštevanju meril iz te direktive, med drugim o notranjem trgu, zaščiti vlagateljev in učinkovitem spremljanju sistemskega tveganja, pri čemer določi datum, ko bodo morali biti nacionalni sistemi iz te direktive ukinjeni v vseh državah članicah.
4 years after the deadline for transposition of this Directive, the Commission should, on the basis of public consultation and in the light of the discussions with competent authorities, commence a review of the application and the scope of this Directive.
Štiri leta po roku za prenos te direktive bi Komisija na podlagi javnega posvetovanja in glede na razgovore s pristojnimi organi morala začeti pregled o izvajanju in področju uporabe te direktive.
That review should analyse the experience acquired in applying this Directive, its impact on investors, AIFs or AIFMs, in the Union and in third countries, and the extent to which the objectives of this Directive have been achieved, if necessary proposing appropriate amendments.
Pri tem pregledu bi morala analizirati izkušnje, pridobljene pri uporabi te direktive, njen vpliv na vlagatelje, AIS ali UAIS tako v Uniji kot v tretjih državah, ter v kolikšni meri so doseženi cilji direktive, po potrebi pa tudi predlaga ustrezne spremembe.
That review should include a general survey of the functioning of the rules laid down in this Directive and the experience acquired in applying them.
Pregled bi moral vključevati splošno preučitev delovanja pravil iz te direktive ter izkušnje, pridobljene z njihovim izvajanjem.
The Commission should in its review examine the functions of ESMA and the Union competent authorities in ensuring effective supervision of all AIFMs operating in the Union markets in the context of this Directive, including, inter alia – in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 – entrusting ESMA with further supervisory responsibilities in the field of authorisation and supervision of non-EU AIFMs.
Komisija bi morala v svojem pregledu preučiti delovanje ESMA ter pristojnih organov Unije pri zagotavljanju učinkovitega nadzora nad vsemi UAIS, ki delujejo na trgih Unije v okviru te direktive, kar med drugim – v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1095/2010 – vključuje tudi dodelitev dodatnih nadzornih pristojnosti ESMA na področju izdaje dovoljenj ne-EU UAIS in nadzora nad njimi.
In this context the Commission should assess the costs and benefits of entrusting ESMA with such tasks.
V tem okviru bi Komisija morala oceniti, kakšne stroške in koristi bi prinesla dodelitev teh nalog ESMA.
This Directive aims at establishing a framework capable of addressing the potential risks which might arise from the activities of AIFMs and ensuring the effective monitoring of those risks by the competent authorities within the Union.
Cilj te direktive je vzpostavitev okvira, ki bo lahko obravnaval potencialna tveganja, ki jih lahko povzročijo dejavnosti UAIS, ter da pristojni organi v Uniji zagotavljajo učinkovito nadzorovanje teh tveganj.
It is necessary to provide for a stringent regulatory and supervisory framework which leaves no gaps in financial regulation.
Treba je zagotoviti strog regulativni in nadzorni okvir, ki v finančni uredbi ne bo dopuščal vrzeli.
In that regard reference is made to the existing due diligence requirements applicable to professional investors pursuant to the relevant regulation applicable to such investors.
V zvezi s tem se sklicuje na obstoječe zahteve po primerni skrbnosti, ki veljajo za profesionalne vlagatelje v skladu z zadevno ureditvijo, veljavno za te vlagatelje.
The Commission is invited to review the relevant legislation with respect to professional investors in order to assess the need for tighter requirements regarding the due diligence process to be undertaken by Union professional investors investing on their own initiative in non-EU financial products, such as non-EU AIFs.
Komisijo se povabi, da pregleda zadevno zakonodajo v zvezi s profesionalnimi vlagatelji, da se oceni potreba po uvedbi strožjih zahtev glede postopka za primerno skrbnost, ki ga izvajajo profesionalni vlagatelji v Uniji, ki vlagajo na lastno pobudo v ne-EU finančne produkte, kot so ne-EU AIS.
At the end of its review, the Commission should present a report to the European Parliament and the Council including, if appropriate, proposed amendments taking into account the objectives of this Directive and potential impacts on investors, AIFs or AIFMs, in the Union and in third countries.
Po tem pregledu bi morala Komisija predložiti poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, po potrebi skupaj s predlaganimi spremembami, ob upoštevanju ciljev te direktive in morebitnih vplivov na vlagatelje ter AIS ali UAIS tako iz Unije kot iz tretjih držav.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to ensure a high level of investor protection by laying down a common framework for the authorisation and supervision of AIFMs, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, as evidenced by the deficiencies of existing nationally based regulation and oversight of those actors, and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer zagotovitve visoke ravni zaščite vlagateljev z določitvijo skupnega okvira za dovoljenje in nadzor UAIS, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, kot to dokazujejo pomanjkljivosti obstoječih nacionalnih ureditev in nadzora teh akterjev, in ker se ta cilj lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenega.
Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC, Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies [21] and Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Zato bi bilo treba direktivi 2003/41/ES in 2009/65/ES ter Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o bonitetnih agencijah [21] in Uredbo (EU) št. 1095/2010 ustrezno spremeniti –
This Directive lays down the rules for the authorisation, ongoing operation and transparency of the managers of alternative investment funds (AIFMs) which manage and/or market alternative investment funds (AIFs) in the Union.
Ta direktiva določa pravila o dovoljenjih, trajnem delovanju in preglednosti upraviteljev alternativnih investicijskih skladov (UAIS), ki upravljajo in/ali tržijo alternativne investicijske sklade (AIS) v Uniji.
Subject to paragraph 3 of this Article and to Article 3, this Directive shall apply to:
Ob upoštevanju odstavka 3 tega člena in člena 3, se ta direktiva uporablja za:
EU AIFMs which manage one or more AIFs irrespective of whether such AIFs are EU AIFs or non-EU AIFs;
EU UAIS, ki upravljajo enega ali več AIS ne glede na to, ali so ti AIS EU ali ne-EU AIS;
non-EU AIFMs which manage one or more EU AIFs; and
ne-EU UAIS, ki upravljajo enega ali več EU AIS, in
non-EU AIFMs which market one or more AIFs in the Union irrespective of whether such AIFs are EU AIFs or non-EU AIFs.
ne-EU UAIS, ki tržijo enega ali več AIS v Uniji ne glede na to, ali so ti EU ali ne-EU AIS.
For the purposes of paragraph 1, the following shall be of no significance:
Za namene odstavka 1 ni pomembno:
whether the AIF belongs to the open-ended or closed-ended type;
ali je AIS odprtega ali zaprtega tipa;
whether the AIF is constituted under the law of contract, under trust law, under statute, or has any other legal form;
ali so AIS ustanovljeni na podlagi pogodbenega prava, prava, ki se uporablja za sklade ali zakona, ali pa imajo kakšno drugo pravno obliko;
the legal structure of the AIFM.
pravna struktura UAIS.
This Directive shall not apply to the following entities:
Ta direktiva se ne uporablja za naslednje subjekte:
holding companies;
holdinške družbe;
institutions for occupational retirement provision which are covered by Directive 2003/41/EC, including, where applicable, the authorised entities responsible for managing such institutions and acting on their behalf referred to in Article 2(1) of that Directive or the investment managers appointed pursuant to Article 19(1) of that Directive, in so far as they do not manage AIFs;
institucije za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje, ki jih ureja Direktiva 2003/41/ES, vključno s, kjer je to ustrezno, pooblaščenimi subjekti, ki so odgovorni za upravljanje teh institucij in delujejo v njihovem imenu, kakor določa člen 2(1) navedene direktive, ali upravitelji premoženja imenovanimi v skladu s členom 19(1) navedene direktive, če ne upravljajo AIS;
supranational institutions, such as the European Central Bank, the European Investment Bank, the European Investment Fund, the European Development Finance Institutions and bilateral development banks, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and other supranational institutions and similar international organisations, in the event that such institutions or organisations manage AIFs and in so far as those AIFs act in the public interest;
nadnacionalne institucije, kot so Evropska centralna banka, Evropska investicijska banka, Evropski investicijski sklad, Evropske razvojne finančne institucije in bilateralne razvojne banke, Svetovna banka, Mednarodni denarni sklad, druge nadnacionalne organizacije in podobne mednarodne organizacije, v primeru, da takšne institucije ali organizacije upravljajo AIS in če ti AIS delujejo v javnem interesu;
national central banks;
nacionalne centralne banke;
national, regional and local governments and bodies or other institutions which manage funds supporting social security and pension systems;
nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne oblasti in telesa ali druge institucije, ki upravljajo sklade, s katerimi se podpirajo pokojninski sistemi in sistemi socialne varnosti;
employee participation schemes or employee savings schemes;
sheme soodločanja delavcev ali varčevalne sheme delavcev;
securitisation special purpose entities.
subjekte s posebnim namenom pri listinjenju.