natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission, by Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’).
Komisija je z Uredbo (EU) št. 404/2010 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 30 June 2009 by the Association of European Wheel Manufacturers (EUWA) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 % of the total Union production of certain aluminium wheels.
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 30. junija 2009 vložilo Združenje evropskih proizvajalcev koles (EUWA) („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež celotne proizvodnje nekaterih aluminijastih koles v Uniji, kar je v tem primeru več kot 50 %.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu zadevnega izdelka in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka.
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional measures (‘provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev za uvedbo začasnih ukrepov („začasno razkritje“), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami.
The parties who so requested were granted the opportunity to be heard.
Strani, ki so to zahtevale, so imele tudi možnost za zaslišanje.
The Commission continued to seek information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je še naprej zbirala informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za sprejetje dokončnih ugotovitev.
It is recalled that, as set out in recital (18) of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Treba je opozoriti, da je preiskava dampinga in škode, kakor je določeno v uvodni izjavi (18) začasne uredbe, zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2006 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih koles s poreklom iz LRK in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
They were also granted a period of time within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Določen je bil tudi rok, v katerem so po tem razkritju lahko predložile svoja stališča.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so se proučile in po potrebi ustrezno upoštevale.
One party, representing the interests of exporting producers, claimed that imports of the product concerned from Turkey should be included in the scope of the present investigation.
Ena stran, ki je zastopala interese proizvajalcev izvoznikov, je trdila, da bi bilo treba uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Turčije vključiti v obseg te preiskave.
Concerning the non-inclusion in the complaint of imports originating in Turkey, it should be noted that at initiation stage, there was no sufficient evidence of dumping, injury and causal link from this country to justify the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding on such imports.
Glede nevključitve uvoza s poreklom iz Turčije v pritožbo je treba omeniti, da v začetni stopnji ni bilo dovolj dokazov o dampingu, škodi in vzročni zvezi iz te države, da bi se upravičil začetek protidampinškega postopka o tem uvozu.
To the contrary, the complainants submitted information that imports from Turkey of the product concerned were at non-dumped prices (see non-confidential version of the complaint, page 13, point 5, and annex 5.1.a.).
Nasprotno, pritožniki so predložili informacije, da je potekal uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Turčije po nedampinških cenah (glej nezaupno različico pritožbe v točki 5 na strani 13 in Prilogi 5.1.a).
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND THE LIKE PRODUCT
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Following provisional measures some parties reiterated their arguments concerning differences between the Original Equipment Manufacturer (‘OEM’) and aftermarket (‘AM’) wheels, claiming that the two segments should be treated as two different products.
V skladu z začasnimi ukrepi so nekatere strani ponovile argumente o razlikah med proizvajalcem originalne opreme („OEM“) in trga nadomestnih („AM“) koles in trdili, da je treba izdelke na obeh področjih obravnavati kot različne.
Those parties claimed that OEM wheels should be excluded from the scope of the present investigation because the OEM and AM wheels are produced in accordance with different production processes, have different technical and physical characteristics, different channels of distribution and even different uses.
Te strani so trdile, da bi bilo treba kolesa OEM izločiti iz obsega te preiskave, ker se kolesa OEM in AM proizvajajo v različnih proizvodnih procesih, imajo različne tehnične in fizične značilnosti, različne distribucijske kanale in celo različno uporabo.
It is recalled that, as stated in recital (21) of the provisional Regulation, both AM and OEM wheels can be produced by means of all production processes, in all diameters and weights, with all different types of finishing.
Treba je poudariti, da se lahko kolesa AM in OEM, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (21) začasne uredbe, proizvajajo v vseh proizvodnih procesih, v vseh premerih in težah, z vsemi različnimi vrstami končne obdelave.
OEM and AM wheels share the same physical and technical characteristics and are interchangeable.
Kolesa OEM in AM imajo enake fizične in tehnične značilnosti in so zamenljiva.
Some parties claimed that the ultimate consumer of OEM and AM wheels is different: for OEM it would be the car manufacturer and for AM it would be the car owner.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je končni uporabnik koles OEM in AM različen: za OEM naj bi bil to proizvajalec avtomobilov in za AM lastnik avtomobila.
Such an understanding is misguided.
Takšno razumevanje zavaja.
Although indeed the OEM wheels are sourced by car makers the use of both OEM and AM wheels is the same: they are fitted on cars and similar vehicles.
Čeprav nabavljajo kolesa OEM proizvajalci avtomobilov, je uporaba obeh vrst koles, OEM in AM, enaka: namestijo se na avtomobile in podobna vozila.
Hence they have the same ultimate user – the driver.
Torej imajo istega končnega uporabnika, to je voznika.
The most common argument put forward was that the requirements for OEM wheels differ from those for AM wheels.
Najpogosteje navedeni argument je bil, da se potrebe po kolesih OEM razlikujejo od tistih po kolesih AM.
According to that argument measures should not be imposed on OEM wheels because they are not interchangeable with AM wheels (they are purchased to meet the needs of different product markets and differ in terms of design, quality requirements, investment, production process, prices, and import penetration).
V skladu s tem argumentom se ukrepi ne bi smeli uvesti za kolesa OEM, ker niso zamenljiva s kolesi AM (kupujejo se za izpolnjevanje potreb trgov različnih izdelkov in se razlikujejo glede oblikovanja, zahtev glede kakovosti, vlaganja, proizvodnega procesa, cen in prodora uvoza).
Another argument was that OEM wheels are produced according to car makers’ specifications while AM wheels are designed and manufactured according to specifications chosen by the wheel manufacturer without taking into account the requirements of a specific car model.
Naslednji argument je bil, da se kolesa OEM proizvajajo v skladu s specifikacijami proizvajalcev avtomobilov, kolesa AM pa so oblikovana in se izdelujejo po specifikacijah, ki jih izberejo proizvajalci koles brez upoštevanja zahtev za poseben model avtomobila.
Although the AM wheels are not nominally produced according to the specifications provided by the car makers, they will be fitted on different car models.
Čeprav se kolesa AM formalno ne proizvajajo po specifikacijah, ki jih zagotavljajo proizvajalci avtomobilov, se nameščajo na različne modele avtomobilov.
In fact, eventually, they will be fitted on exactly the same car models for which the OEM wheels had been originally produced.
Dejansko se vendar nameščajo na povsem enake modele avtomobilov, za katere so se prvotno proizvedla kolesa OEM.
The fact that specifications come from different sources cannot be considered as such as a proof of differences in physical and technical characteristics.
Dejstvo, da specifikacije izvirajo iz različnih virov, se ne more šteti kot dokaz za razlike v fizičnih in tehničnih značilnostih.
Additional information was received from the Union producers and car makers.
Komisija je prejela dodatne informacije od proizvajalcev in izdelovalcev avtomobilov iz Unije.
It confirmed that the same production processes (casting, flow forming, rolling, forging, 2-3 parts wheels) are used for both AM and OEM wheels.
Informacije so potrdile, da se za obe vrsti koles, AM in OEM, uporabljajo enaki proizvodni procesi (lita, potisno oblikovana, kovana in dvo- do tridelna kolesa).
They are both produced in all weights and diameters.
Obe vrsti se proizvajata v vseh težah in premerih.
Inserts, the use of certain types of finishing and heat treatment are applicable to OEM and AM wheels alike.
Vložki, nekatere vrste končne in toplotne obdelave se uporabljajo enako pri obeh vrstah koles, AM in OEM.
Some parties claimed that technical differences between the OEM and AM wheels were reflected in the fact that OEM wheels use primary aluminium whereas in the production of AM wheels aluminium would be often extracted from scrap.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da se tehnične razlike med kolesi OEM in AM odražajo v dejstvu, da se za kolesa OEM uporablja predvsem primarni aluminij, medtem ko se aluminij pri proizvodnji koles za AM pogosto pridobiva iz ostankov.
The Commission thoroughly analysed those comments.
Komisija je temeljito analizirala te pripombe.
Also, additional information was received from car makers and EU producers.
Dodatne informacije so bile prejete tudi od izdelovalcev avtomobilov in proizvajalcev EU.
In particular those EU producers which manufacture both OEM and AM wheels attested that both primary aluminium and – although to a limited extent – aluminium extracted from scrap is used in the production of both types of wheels.
Zlasti tisti proizvajalci EU, ki izdelujejo obe vrsti koles, OEM in AM, so potrdili, da se obe vrsti aluminija, primarni in aluminij, pridobljen iz ostankov (čeprav v omejenem obsegu), uporabljata v proizvodnji obeh vrst koles.
Additional information collected in the investigation confirmed that the main criterion used to distinguish the type and quality of aluminium used is the percentage of silicium (7 % or 11 %).
Dodatne informacije, zbrane v preiskavi, so potrdile, da je glavno merilo, uporabljeno za razlikovanje vrste in kakovosti uporabljenega aluminija, odstotek silicija (7 % ali 11 %).
Both alloys are used for OEM and AM wheels alike.
Obe zlitini se uporabljata enako pri kolesih OEM in AM.
Differences in testing requirements are also not as such conclusive that OEM and AM wheels are two different products.
Tudi razlike v zahtevah za preskušanje niso tako močne, da bi bila kolesa OEM in AM dva različna izdelka.
It has to be noted that there is no general homogeneous set of requirements for aluminium wheels.
Treba je omeniti, da ni nobene splošne enovite zbirke zahtev za aluminijasta kolesa.
Standards change according to producer and country.
Standardi se spreminjajo glede na proizvajalca in državo.
In the end it is not possible to establish a coherent dividing line between AM and OEM wheels on the basis of standards or requirements.
Navsezadnje ni mogoče uvesti jasne ločnice med kolesi AM in OEM na podlagi standardov ali zahtev.
According to the information on file, both OEM and AM wheels are subject to various tests (x-ray tests, chemical tests, leakage test, stress tests, anti-corrosion tests, wheel balancing tests, impact tests, radial endurance tests, bending tests, salt spray tests, CASS-tests (Copper-Accelerated Acetic Salt Spray test).
V skladu z zabeleženimi informacijami se na obeh vrstah koles, OEM in AM, izvajajo razni preskusi (rentgenski preskusi, kemični preskusi, preskus puščanja, preskusi obremenitve, protikorozijski preskusi, preskusi uravnoteženja koles, udarni preskusi, preskusi radialne vzdržljivosti, preskusi upogibanja, preskusi s slano meglo, CASS-preskusi (preskus s slano meglo z razredčeno ocetno raztopino za pobakrena kolesa)).
Further, it appears that differences in testing as well as differences in standards are an indication of a dividing line between different Member States rather than between OEM and AM wheels as two different products.
Poleg tega se zdi, da so razlike v preskušanju pa tudi razlike v standardih bolj znak ločnice med različnimi državami članicami kot med kolesi OEM in AM kot dvema različnima izdelkoma.
According to the information on file, quality requirements imposed by the car industry lead to a highly standardized product which is easily interchangeable between all producers worldwide.
V skladu z zabeleženimi informacijami zahteve glede kakovosti, ki jih postavlja avtomobilska industrija, vodijo do visoko standardiziranih izdelkov, ki se zlahka zamenjujejo med vsemi proizvajalci po svetu.
In the AM segment quality requirements can also be laid down by the customers and those wheels also have to meet international and national requirements.
Na področju AM lahko zahteve glede kakovosti postavljajo tudi stranke in tudi ta kolesa morajo izpolnjevati mednarodne in nacionalne zahteve.
Consequently, more stringent requirements or specifications may apply to certain wheels in both segments, meaning that some AM wheels might comply with more stringent standards than OEM wheels.
Zato se lahko za nekatera kolesa na obeh področjih uporabljajo strožje zahteve ali specifikacije, kar pomeni, da lahko nekatera kolesa AM izpolnjujejo strožje standarde kot kolesa OEM.
The fact that AM wheels are customarily not installed on new cars and that car makers use wheels produced by selected manufacturers under their brand name is a sourcing decision which has no bearing on the conclusion on the interchangeability of OEM and AM wheels.
Dejstvo, da se kolesa AM praviloma ne vgrajujejo na nove avtomobile in da izdelovalci avtomobilov uporabljajo kolesa, ki jih proizvajajo izbrani proizvajalci pod imenom njihove blagovne znamke, je odločitev o viru nabave, ki nima nobenega vpliva na ugotovitve glede zamenljivosti koles OEM in AM.
Physically an AM wheel, i.e. a wheel bearing a brand name of a wheel manufacturer, could be installed on a new car.
Fizično se lahko kolo AM, to je kolo, ki ima ime blagovne znamke proizvajalca koles, namesti na nov avtomobil.
These conclusions are confirmed by the fact that car makers also source and sell aftermarket wheels.
Te sklepne ugotovitve potrjuje dejstvo, da tudi izdelovalci avtomobilov dobavljajo in prodajajo nadomestna kolesa.
Some of these are sold under the car maker brand name (Original Equipment Supplier, OES), some under the brand name of the wheel manufacturer.
Nekatera od teh se prodajajo pod imenom blagovne znamke izdelovalca (dobavitelja originalne opreme – OES), nekatera pod imenom blagovne znamke proizvajalca koles.
Many comments concerned the requirements imposed by car manufacturers on suppliers of wheels (e.g. evidence of a fully-functioning ISO certified quality management system, assessment of quality performance based on experience from previous projects and delivery and field quality, product specific and project specific risk assessment).
Številne pripombe so se nanašale na zahteve, ki jih proizvajalci avtomobilov postavljajo dobaviteljem koles (npr. dokaz o popolnem delovanju sistema upravljanja kakovosti, ki je certificiran v skladu s standardi ISO, oceno uspešnosti kakovosti na podlagi izkušenj iz prejšnjih projektov in dobav ter kakovosti na terenu ter oceno tveganja po posameznem izdelku in projektu).
However, aluminium road wheels share the same physical, technical and chemical characteristics and uses regardless of imposed requirements which are not pertinent to those characteristics.
Vendar imajo aluminijasta kolesa enake fizične, tehnične in kemične lastnosti in uporabo ne glede na postavljene zahteve, ki niso pomembne za te lastnosti.
It should finally also be recalled that many wheel manufacturers produce for both segments and OEM and AM wheels are produced on the same production lines.
Končno bi bilo treba opozoriti, da številni proizvajalci koles proizvajajo za obe področji in se kolesa OEM in AM proizvajajo na istih proizvodnih linijah.
Producers active in one segment can enter the other segment.
Proizvajalci, ki so dejavni na enem področju, lahko vstopijo na drugo področje.
Finally, some parties argued that OEM and AM wheels should be considered as two different products because they fall under different customs subheadings.
Nazadnje, nekatere strani so trdile, da bi bilo treba kolesa OEM in AM šteti za dva različna izdelka, ker spadajo pod različni carinski podštevilki.
The current anti-dumping proceeding concerns aluminium road wheels (‘ARWs’) currently falling within CN codes ex87087010 and ex87087050.
Ta protidampinški postopek se nanaša na aluminijasta kolesa, ki so trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN ex87087010 in ex87087050.
CN code 87087010 concerns road wheels and parts and accessories thereof for industrial assembly.
Oznaka KN 87087010 se nanaša na kolesa, njihove dele in pribor za industrijsko sestavljanje.
This means that the application of the lower duty rate foreseen therein is subject to the so-called end-use control.
To pomeni, da je uporaba nižje stopnje dajatve, ki je tu predvidena, predmet tako imenovanega nadzora končne uporabe.
The two CN codes are split to indicate the difference in duty rate and to allow for the application of a lower rate for road wheels for industrial assembly.
Dve oznaki KN sta razdeljeni, da označujeta različni stopnji dajatve in omogočata uporabo nižje stopnje za kolesa za industrijsko sestavo.
This however does not have any impact on the definition of the product concerned.
To seveda nima vpliva na opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
In reply to parties comments it has to be noted first that the definition of the product concerned in an anti-dumping proceeding does not refer to product classifications under different customs headings.
V odgovor na pripombe strani je treba najprej omeniti, da se zadevni izdelek v protidampinškem postopku ne nanaša na razvrstitev izdelka pod različni carinski številki.
Hence, a product concerned in an anti-dumping proceeding might encompass different CN codes.
Torej lahko zadevni izdelek v protidampinškem postopku vključuje različne oznake KN.
In fact such a situation is rather common.
Dejansko je tak položaj razmeroma pogost.
Secondly, wheels falling under both CN codes are the same.
Drugič, kolesa, ki se uvrščajo pod obe oznaki KN, so enaka.
The only difference is the way they are channelled after importation.
Edina razlika je način, kako se preusmerjajo po uvozu.
Thirdly, it has to be also noted that the volumes of imports under the CN code linked to industrial assembly are less than volumes of OEM imports declared by the cooperating car makers.
Tretjič, omeniti je treba, da je obseg uvoza pod oznako KN, ki je povezana z industrijskim sestavljanjem, manjši od obsega uvoza OEM, ki ga prijavljajo sodelujoči izdelovalci avtomobilov.
This appears to imply that OEM wheels have been customs cleared under both CN codes.
Zdi se, da to pomeni, da se kolesa OEM carinijo po obeh oznakah KN.
Given that it therefore seems that car makers import under both CN codes, formal differentiation based on end use would be extremely difficult.
Glede na to se torej zdi, da izdelovalci avtomobilov uvažajo po obeh oznakah KN, formalno razlikovanje na podlagi končne uporabe pa bi bilo izredno težko.
Consequently, the arguments put forward by interested parties are rejected and the conclusions of the provisional Regulation confirmed.
Zato se argumenti, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, zavrnejo in se potrdijo sklepne ugotovitve začasne uredbe.
OEM and AM wheels are considered to form one single product concerned.
Šteje se, da so kolesa OEM in AM en zadevni izdelek.
Motorcycle and trailer wheels
Kolesa motornih koles in priklopnih vozil
The product concerned by the present investigation are ‘aluminium road wheels of the motor vehicles of CN headings 8701 to 8705, whether or not with their accessories and whether or not fitted with tyres, currently falling within CN codes ex87087010 and ex87087050 (TARIC codes 8708701010 and 8708705010)’.
Zadevni izdelek v tej preiskavi so „aluminijasta kolesa za motorna vozila pod tarifnimi številkami KN od 8701 do 8705, s priborom ali brez, z nameščenimi pnevmatikami ali brez, trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN ex87087010 in ex87087050 (oznaki TARIC 8708701010 in 8708705010)“.
This definition conforms to the Notice of initiation published on 13 August 2009 and to the complaint at the origin of the case.
Ta opredelitev je v skladu z Obvestilom o začetku, ki je bilo objavljeno 13. avgusta 2009, in s pritožbo, ki je bila povod za zadevo.
Parties raised questions as to whether the investigation would also cover motorcycle and trailer wheels.
Strani so sprožile vprašanje, ali bo preiskava zajela tudi kolesa motornih koles in priklopnih vozil.
The above mentioned definition implicitly excludes aluminium road wheels for motorcycles of heading 8711 and for trailers of heading 8716 which are in principle classified respectively under headings 8711 and 8716.
Zgornja opredelitev posredno izključuje aluminijasta kolesa za motorna kolesa pod tarifno številko 8711 in za priklopna vozila pod tarifno številko 8716, ki so načeloma uvrščena pod tarifni številki 8711 in 8716.
Regarding trailer wheels, during the investigation, it was argued that, apart from the CN codes indicated in the Notice of initiation of the proceeding, another code which covers, inter alia, wheels for trailers (CN code 87169090) could be used for imports into the Union to circumvent measures on the product concerned (although it appears that the code is not currently used for that purpose in practice).
Glede koles za priklopna vozila se je med preiskavo trdilo, da bi se lahko poleg oznak KN, navedenih v Obvestilu o začetku postopka, za uvoz v Unijo uporabila druga oznaka, ki med drugim pokriva kolesa za priklopna vozila (oznaka KN 87169090), da bi se izognili ukrepom za zadevni izdelek (čeprav se zdi, da se oznaka v praksi trenutno ne uporablja za ta namen).
It was proposed that the present investigation should also cover aluminium wheels falling under CN code 87169090.
Predlagano je bilo, da bi ta preiskava vključila tudi aluminijasta kolesa, ki se uvršajo pod oznako KN 87169090.