natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
R3P5 — the maximum meat measure (maximum rib position minus minimum fat position converted to mm).
R3P5 – največja stopnja mesnatosti (lega največjega rebra minus lega najmanjše maščobe, pretvorjeno v mm).
The measuring points are described in Part II of the protocol presented to the Commission by Germany in accordance with Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
Točke merjenja so opisane v delu II protokola, ki ga je Komisiji predložila Nemčija v skladu s členom 23(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1249/2008.
The rules provided for in this Part shall apply when the grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as “CSB Image-Meater”.
Pravila, določena v tem delu, se uporabljajo, kadar se razvrščanje prašičjih trupov opravi s pomočjo naprave, imenovane ‚CSB Image-Meater‘.
The CSB Image-Meater consists in particular of a video camera, a PC equipped with an image-analysis card, a screen, a printer, a command mechanism, a rate mechanism and interfaces.
Glavni sestavni deli naprave CSB Image-Meater so video kamera, osebni računalnik, opremljen s kartico za analiziranje slike, zaslon, tiskalnik, krmilni mehanizem, sprožitveni mehanizem in vmesniki.
The 3 Image-Meater variables are all measured at the split line in the ham area (around M. gluteus medius):
Meritve vseh treh Image-Meater spremenljivk se opravijo na razpolovnici v predelu stegna (okoli M. gluteus medius).
MS — mean fat measure above (dorsal of) M. gluteus medius (mm),
MS – povprečna stopnja maščobe nad (dorzalno od) M. gluteus medius (mm),
MF — mean meat measure — over the length of M. gluteus medius (mm),
MF – povprečna stopnja mesnatosti vzdolž M. gluteus medius (mm),
WL — mean length of the four lumbar vertebral bodies cranial of the M. gluteus medius (mm).
WL – povprečna dolžina glavnin štirih ledvenih vretenc kranialno od M. gluteus medius (mm).
This formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 50 and 120 kg.’.
Ta enačba velja za trupe, ki tehtajo med 50 in 120 kg.“
OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p. 3.’;
UL L 337, 16.12.2008, str. 3.“;
on the recognition of Tunisia as regards education, training and certification of seafarers for the recognition of certificates of competency
o priznavanju Tunizije glede izobrazbe, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakov v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti
Having regard to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the minimum level of training of seafarers [1], and in particular Article 19(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o minimalni ravni izobraževanja pomorščakov [1] in zlasti člena 19(3) Direktive,
Having regard to the letter of 9 March 2006 from the French Authorities, requesting the recognition of Tunisia in order to recognise certificates of competency issued by that country,
ob upoštevanju dopisa francoskih organov z dne 9. marca 2006 z zahtevo po priznavanju Tunizije v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti, ki jih izda ta država,
Member States may decide to endorse seafarers’ certificates of competency issued by third countries, provided that the relevant third country is recognised by the Commission as ensuring that this country complies with the requirements of the international Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended (STCW Convention) [2].
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da potrdijo spričevala usposobljenosti pomorščakov, ki jih izdajo tretje države, če Komisija zadevni tretji državi priznava, da upošteva zahteve Mednarodne konvencije o standardih za usposabljanje, izdajanje spričeval in ladijsko stražarjenje pomorščakov (konvencija STCW) [2] iz leta 1978, kakor je bila spremenjena.
Following the request of the French Authorities, the Commission assessed the maritime education, training and certification systems in Tunisia in order to verify whether this country complies with the requirements of the STCW Convention and whether appropriate measures have been taken to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Na podlagi zahteve francoskih organov je Komisija ocenila sisteme pomorskega izobraževanja, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval v Tuniziji, da bi preverila, ali ta država izpolnjuje zahteve konvencije STCW in ali so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali.
This assessment was based on the results of a fact-finding inspection performed by experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency in April 2007.
Ta ocena je temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcijskega pregleda za ugotavljanje dejstev, ki so ga opravili strokovnjaki Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost aprila 2007.
Subsequently, the Commission requested the Tunisian Authorities, by letter of 28 January 2009 to provide evidence demonstrating whether the deficiencies detected during the assessment were adequately addressed.
Nato je Komisija v dopisih z dne 28. januarja 2009 od tunizijskih organov zahtevala, naj predložijo dokaz, s katerim bi prikazali, ali so bile pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med ocenjevanjem, ustrezno odpravljene.
The Tunisian Authorities provided, by letter of 25 November 2009, the requested information and evidence concerning the implementation of appropriate and sufficient corrective action to address all of the deficiencies identified during the assessment of compliance.
Tunizijski organi so v dopisu z dne 25. novembra 2009 predložili zadevne informacije in dokaze glede izvajanja ustreznih in zadostnih korektivnih ukrepov za odpravljanje vseh pomanjkljivosti, odkritih med ocenjevanjem skladnosti.
The outcome of the assessment of compliance and the evaluation of the information provided by the Tunisian Authorities demonstrate that Tunisia complies with the relevant requirements of the STCW Convention, while this country has taken appropriate measures to prevent fraud involving certificates and should thus be recognised by the Union.
Izid ocenjevanja skladnosti in ocena informacij, ki so jih poslali tunizijski organi, kažeta, da Tunizija upošteva zadevne zahteve konvencije STCW, pri čemer je ta država sprejela primerne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali, in bi jo Unija zato morala priznati.
Tunisia is recognised as regards education, training and certification of seafarers, for the purpose of recognition of certificates of competency issued by that country.
Glede izobrazbe, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakov se Tunizija priznava v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti, ki jih izda ta država.
Council Implementing Decision 2011/261/CFSP
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2011/261/SZVP
of 29 April 2011
z dne 29. aprila 2011
implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire
o izvajanju Sklepa 2010/656/SZVP o podaljšanju omejevalnih ukrepov proti Slonokoščeni obali
Having regard to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire [1], and in particular Article 6(2) thereof, in conjunction with Article 31(2) of the Treaty on European Union,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2010/656/SZVP z dne 29. oktobra 2010 o podaljšanju omejevalnih ukrepov proti Slonokoščeni obali [1] in zlasti člena 6(2) navedenega sklepa v povezavi s členom 31(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
In view of the developments in Côte d'Ivoire, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP should be amended,
Glede na dogajanje v Slonokoščeni obali bi bilo treba spremeniti seznam oseb in subjektov iz Priloge II k Sklepu 2010/656/SZVP, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi –
Done at Brussels, 29 April 2011.
V Bruslju, 29. aprila 2011
PETROCI (National Petroleum Operations Company of Côte d’Ivoire)
PETROCI (državna družba Slonokoščene obale za naftne projekte)
BFA (Agricultural Credit Bank)
BFA (Banque pour le Financement de l'Agriculture – banka za financiranje kmetijstva)
Caisse d’Epargne de Côte d’Ivoire (Savings Bank of Côte d’Ivoire)
Caisse d'Epargne de Côte d’Ivoire (Hranilnica Slonokoščene obale)
Banque de l’Habitat de Côte d’Ivoire (BHCI) (Housing Bank of Côte d’Ivoire)
Banque de l'Habitat de Côte d'Ivoire (BHCI) (Stanovanjska banka Slonokoščene obale)
concerning the non-inclusion of propisochlor in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC
o nevključitvi propizoklora v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in spremembi Odločbe Komisije 2008/941/ES
That list included propisochlor.
Navedeni seznam je vključeval propizoklor.
In accordance with Article 24e of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 the notifier withdrew its support of the inclusion of that active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC within 2 months from receipt of the draft assessment report.
V skladu s členom 24e Uredbe (ES) št. 2229/2004 je prijavitelj v dveh mesecih od prejema osnutka poročila o oceni umaknil predlog za vključitev navedene aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/941/EC of 8 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances [4] was adopted which provides for the non-inclusion of propisochlor.
Zato je bila za nevključitev propizoklora sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/941/ES z dne 8. decembra 2008 o nevključitvi nekaterih aktivnih snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo te snovi [4].
The application was submitted to Hungary, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004.
Zahtevek je bil vložen pri Madžarski, ki je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 2229/2004 imenovana za državo članico poročevalko.
Hungary evaluated the additional data submitted by the applicant and prepared an additional report.
Madžarska je ocenila dodatne podatke, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, in pripravila dodatno poročilo.
It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 30 November 2009.
Navedeno poročilo je 30. novembra 2009 predložila Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in Komisiji.
The Authority communicated the additional report to the other Member States and the applicant for comments and forwarded the comments it had received to the Commission.
Agencija je dodatno poročilo poslala v presojo drugim državam članicam in vlagatelju ter prejete pripombe posredovala Komisiji.
In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on propisochlor to the Commission on 9 September 2010 [6] based on data submitted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
V skladu s členom 20(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in na zahtevo Komisije je Agencija 9. septembra 2010 Komisiji predložila svoj sklep o propizokloru [6] na podlagi podatkov, predloženih v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 33/2008.
The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 24 March 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for propisochlor.
Države članice in Komisija so osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatno poročilo in sklep Agencije pregledale v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 24. marca 2011 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu propizoklora.
In particular, it was not possible to perform a reliable consumer risk assessment and to conclude on a residue definition for propisochlor and its metabolites due to a lack of data on the toxicological relevance of several metabolites (M2 [7], M7 [8], M12 [9], M14 [10], M17 [11], M20 [12], M22 [13] and M35 [14].
Zlasti ni bilo mogoče pripraviti zanesljive ocene tveganja za potrošnike in določiti opredelitev ostankov za propizoklor in njegove metabolite, ker ni podatkov o toksikološkem pomenu več metabolitov (M2 [7], M7 [8], M12 [9], M14 [10], M17 [11], M20 [12], M22 [13] in M35 [14].
In addition, harmful effects on groundwater cannot be excluded for several metabolites (M1 [15], M2, M5 [16], M7 and M9 [17] of unknown toxicological and ecotoxicological relevance whose levels exceeded the maximum permissible concentration of 0,1 μg/l as laid down by Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption [18] in several model scenarios for groundwater leaching.
Poleg tega ni mogoče izključiti škodljivega vpliva na podtalnico pri več metabolitih (M1 [15], M2, M5 [16], M7 in M9 [17] neznanega toksikološkega in ekotoksikološkega pomena, katerih ravni presegajo najvišjo dovoljeno koncentracijo 0,1 μg/l iz Direktive Sveta 98/83/ES z dne 3. novembra 1998 o kakovosti vode, namenjene za prehrano ljudi [18], v več vzorčnih predvidenih potekih izpiranja v podtalnico.
Finally, the data available were not sufficient to conclude on the soil, sediment and groundwater exposure for the major soil metabolite M9 and to finalise the risk assessment for aquatic organisms.
Nazadnje razpoložljivi podatki niso bili zadostni za sklep o izpostavljenosti tal, mulja in podtalnice pri glavnem metabolitu v tleh M9 ter dokončanje ocene tveganja za vodne organizme.
The Commission invited the applicant to submit its comments on the results of the focused peer review.
Komisija je vlagatelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k ugotovitvam usmerjenega pregleda strokovnjakov.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the applicant to submit comments on the draft review report.
Poleg tega je Komisija v skladu s členom 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 pozvala vlagatelja, naj predloži pripombe k osnutku poročila o pregledu.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the applicant, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and evaluated during the meetings of the Authority have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing propisochlor satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Kljub argumentom, ki jih je vlagatelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi informacij, predloženih v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 33/2008 in preučenih na srečanjih Agencije, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo propizoklor, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Propisochlor should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Propizoklor se zato ne sme vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of a further application for propisochlor pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na predložitev dodatnega zahtevka za propizoklor v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in poglavja II Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008.
In the interest of clarity, the entry for propisochlor in the Annex to Decision 2008/941/EC should be deleted.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba v Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/941/ES črtati vrstico o propizokloru.
It is therefore appropriate to amend Decision 2008/941/EC accordingly.
Odločbo 2008/941/ES je zato primerno ustrezno spremeniti.
Propisochlor shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Propizoklor se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing propisochlor are withdrawn by 27 October 2011;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo propizoklor, prekličejo do 27. oktobra 2011;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing propisochlor are granted or renewed from the date of publication of this Decision.
se od datuma objave tega sklepa nobena registracija fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo propizoklor, ne odobri ali podaljša.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 27 October 2012 at the latest.
Morebitno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in traja do najpozneje 27. oktobra 2012.
In the Annex to Decision 2008/941/EC, the entry for ‘propisochlor’ is deleted.
V Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/941/ES se črta vrstica o propizokloru.
‘European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance propisochlor’, EFSA Journal 2010; 8(9):1769.
[6] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo propizoklor, EFSA Journal 2010; 8(9):1769.
Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu
Na voljo na spletu: www.efsa.europa.eu.
2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl) (isopropoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxoethane sulfonic acid.
2-[(2-etil-6-metilfenil) (izopropoksimetil)amino]-2-oksoetan sulfonska kislina.
(2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl) (isopropoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxoethylsulfinyl) acetic acid.
(2-[(2-etil-6-metilfenil) (izopropoksimetil)amino]-2-oksoetilsulfinil) ocetna kislina.
Unidentified compound in maize forage and sunflower seeds.
Neopredeljena spojina v koruzni krmi in sončničnem semenu.
3-(2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)amino]-2-oxoethylsulfinyl)-2-hydroxypropanoic acid.
3-(2-[(2-etil-6-metilfenil)amino]-2-oksoetilsulfinil)-2-hidroksipropanojska kislina.
N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-2-(hexopyranosyloxy)-N-[(propan-2-yloxy)methyl]acetamide.
N-(2-etil-6-metilfenil)-2-(heksopiranosiloksi)-N-[(propan-2-iloksi)metil]acetamid.
methyl3-[(2-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)[(propan-2-yloxy)methyl]amino-2-oxoethyl)sulfinyl]-2-hydroxypropanoate.
metil3-[(2-(2-etil-6-metilfenil)[(propan-2-iloksi)metil]amino-2-oksoetil)sulfinil]-2-hidroksipropanoat.
Unidentified compound in maize grains, sugar beet roots and sunflower seeds.
Neopredeljena spojina v koruznem zrnju, sladkorni pesi in sončničnem semenu.
unidentified compound in sunflower seeds.
Neopredeljena spojina v sončničnem semenu.
2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl) amino]-2-oxoethane sulfonic acid.
2-[(2-etil-6-metilfenil) amino]-2-oksoetan sulfonska kislina.
N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-2-hydroxy-N-(isopropoxymethyl)acetamide.
N-(2-etil-6-metilfenil)-2-hidroksi-N-(izopropoksimetil)acetamid.
dimer of N-(2-ethyl-6-methyl phenyl)-N-(isopropoxymethyl)-2-(mercapto) acetamide.
Dimer N-(2-etil-6-metil fenil)-N-(izopropoksimetil)-2-(merkapto) acetamida.
[60pp].doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1769.
[60 str.].doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1769.
of 28 April 2011
z dne 28. aprila 2011
on establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel to detergents for dishwashers
o določitvi okoljskih meril za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje detergentom za pomivalne stroje
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the EU Ecolabel [1], and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 66/2010 z dne 25. novembra 2009 o znaku EU za okolje [1] in zlasti člena 8(2) Uredbe,
Under Regulation (EC) No 66/2010, the EU Ecolabel may be awarded to those products with a reduced environmental impact during their entire life cycle.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 66/2010 se znak EU za okolje podeljuje tistim proizvodom, ki imajo zmanjšan vpliv na okolje v svojem celotnem življenjskem krogu.
Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 provides that specific EU Ecolabel criteria are to be established according to product groups.
Uredba (ES) št. 66/2010 določa, da se posebna merila za znak EU za okolje določijo po skupinah proizvodov.
Commission Decision 1999/427/EC [2] has established the ecological criteria as well as the related assessment and verification requirements for detergents for dishwashers.
Odločba Komisije 1999/427/ES [2] določa okoljska merila in s tem povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje detergentov za pomivalne stroje.
Following the review of the criteria set out in that Decision, Commission Decision 2003/31/EC [3] has established revised criteria which are valid until 30 April 2011.
Glede na merila iz navedene odločbe Odločba Komisije 2003/31/ES [3] določa spremenjena okoljska merila, veljavna do 30. aprila 2011.
Those criteria have been further reviewed in the light of technological developments.
Glede na tehnološki razvoj so bila ta merila ponovno pregledana.
It results from the review that it is necessary to modify the definition of the product group so as to include a new sub-product group and to establish new criteria.
Iz pregleda je razvidno, da je treba spremeniti opredelitev skupine proizvodov za vključitev nove podskupine proizvodov in določitev novih meril.
Those new criteria, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, should be valid for 4 years from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Ta nova merila ter povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanja se morajo uporabljati štiri leta od datuma uradnega sprejetja tega sklepa.
Decision 2003/31/EC should therefore be replaced for reasons of clarity.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba Odločbo 2003/31/ES nadomestiti.
A transitional period should be allowed for producers whose products have been awarded the Ecolabel for detergents for dishwashers on the basis of the criteria set out in Decision 2003/31/EC, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
Proizvajalcem detergentov za pomivalne stroje, ki so za svoje proizvode dobili znak za okolje za detergente za pomivalne stroje po merilih iz Odločbe 2003/31/ES, se omogoči prehodno obdobje, da bodo imeli dovolj časa za prilagoditev proizvodov spremenjenim merilom in zahtevam.
Producers should also be allowed to submit applications based on the criteria set out in Decision 2003/31/EC or on the criteria set out in this Decision until the lapse of validity of that Decision.
Proizvajalcem je treba omogočiti še, da lahko do izteka veljavnosti Odločbe 2003/31/ES predložijo vloge na podlagi meril iz navedene odločbe ali meril iz tega sklepa.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 66/2010,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 66/2010 –
The product group ‘Detergents for Dishwashers’ shall comprise detergents for dishwashers and products used as rinse aids, whether in powder, liquid or any other form, which are intended to be marketed and used exclusively in automatic domestic dishwashers and in automatic dishwashers for professional use, the size and usage of which is similar to that of domestic dishwashers.
Skupina proizvodov „detergenti za pomivalne stroje“ zajema vse detergente za pomivalne stroje in proizvode za izpiranje, v prašku, tekoči ali drugi obliki, namenjene prodaji in uporabi izključno za avtomatske gospodinjske pomivalne stroje in avtomatske pomivalne stroje za profesionalno rabo, kjer sta velikost in raba primerljiva z gospodinjskimi stroji.
For the purpose of this Decision, the following definitions shall apply:
V tem sklepu se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve:
‘Substance’ means a chemical element and their compounds in the natural state or obtained by any production process, including any additive necessary to preserve the stability of the products and any impurity deriving from the process used, but excluding any solvent which may be separated without affecting the stability of the substance or changing its composition.
„Snov“ pomeni kemični element in njegove spojine v naravnem stanju ali pridobljene v katerem koli proizvodnem postopku, vključno z vsemi potrebnimi dodatki za ohranjanje obstojnosti proizvodov ter nečistočami, ki izhajajo iz uporabljenega postopka, izključuje pa vsa topila, ki se jih da ločiti, ne da bi to prizadelo obstojnost snovi ali spremenilo njeno sestavo.