natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Union industry production capacity figures have overall been decreased by the exclusion of yarns, but that has had no effect on the trend and the capacity utilisation.
Vrednost proizvodne zmogljivosti industrije Unije se je zaradi izključitve preje na splošno zmanjšala, vendar to ni vplivalo na gibanje in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti.
Therefore, the conclusion in recital 69 of the provisional Regulation is herewith confirmed.
Zato se sklepna ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 69 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Union industry — production capacity
Industrija Unije – proizvodna zmogljivost
As the development of stocks of the sampled producers, as compared to the figures provided in the provisional Regulation, was only affected to a very limited extent (a 1 % increase for 2007, 2008 and the IP) by the exclusion of yarns from the product scope, the conclusion in recital 70 of the provisional Regulation is herewith confirmed.
Izključitev preje iz obsega izdelka je v primerjavi s podatki iz začasne uredbe zelo malo vplivala na gibanje zalog vzorčenih proizvajalcev (povečanje za 1 % leta 2007, leta 2008 in v OP), zato se sklepna ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 70 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Union industry — stocks
Industrija Unije – zaloge
Although, as compared to the sales volumes reported in the provisional Regulation, the decrease since 2006 in sales volumes is 1 % stronger in 2007 and 2008 and 3 % less pronounced in the IP, sales volumes declined still by 27 % during the period considered and the conclusions in recitals 71-72 are, therefore, herewith confirmed.
Čeprav je zmanjšanje obsega prodaje od leta 2006, v primerjavi z obsegom prodaje iz začasne uredbe, v letih 2007 in 2008 večje za 1 % ter za 3 % manj izrazito v OP, je obseg prodaje v obravnavanem obdobju upadel za 27 %, zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 71 in 72 potrdijo.
Union industry — EU sales (volumes)
Industrija Unije – prodaja EU (obseg)
All EU producers
Vsi proizvajalci EU
After the exclusion of yarns from the product scope, EU market share of the Union industry has decreased from 76,3 % to 71,9 % (as opposed to from 75,1 % to 69,5 %).
Po izključitvi preje iz obsega izdelka se je tržni delež industrije Unije v EU zmanjšal s 76,3 % na 71,9 % (v nasprotju z zmanjšanjem s 75,1 % na 69,5 %).
The conclusions in recital 73 of the provisional Regulation regarding the market share of the Union industry are therefore confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 73 začasne uredbe glede tržnega deleža industrije Unije se zato potrdijo.
Union industry — EU market share
Industrija Unije – tržni delež EU
EU market share (%)
Tržni delež EU (%)
As concerns average sales prices, the exclusion of yarns from the product scope resulted in overall slightly lower average sales prices.
Zaradi izključitve preje iz obsega izdelka so se povprečne prodajne cene na splošno nekoliko znižale.
The trend is however identical to the sales price trend reported in the provisional Regulation (only 1 % higher figures for 2008 and the IP) and the conclusions in recital 74 of that Regulation are, therefore, herewith confirmed.
Vendar je gibanje popolnoma enako kot gibanje prodajnih cen, navedeno v začasni uredbi (le 1 % povečanje za leto 2008 in v OP), zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 74 navedene uredbe potrdijo.
Union industry — EU sales (average prices)
Industrija Unije – prodaja EU (povprečne cene)
EUR/tonne
EUR za tono
The employment figures of the Union producers have been adjusted to exclude the production of yarns.
Iz podatkov o zaposlenosti proizvajalcev Unije je bila izključena proizvodnja preje.
The relatively small reduction in numbers has left the trend unchanged (only 1 % higher figures for 2008 and the IP), therefore, the conclusions in recital 75 of the provisional Regulation are herewith confirmed.
Sorazmerno majhno zmanjšanje obsega ni spremenilo gibanja (le 1 % povečanje za leto 2008 in v OP), zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 75 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Union industry — employment
Industrija Unije – zaposlenost
The productivity of the Union industry has not been affected by the exclusion of yarns and the conclusions in recital 76 of the provisional Regulation can therefore be confirmed.
Izključitev preje ni vplivala na produktivnost industrije Unije, zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 76 začasne uredbe lahko potrdijo.
Union industry — productivity
Industrija Unije – produktivnost
Tonnes/employee
Tone na zaposlenega
As already mentioned in recital 73 above, in view of the limited presence of yarns within the producers sample, the financial indicators listed below have not been affected by the exclusion of yarns from the product scope.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 73, zaradi omejenega deleža preje v vzorcu proizvajalcev izključitev preje iz obsega izdelka ni vplivala na finančne kazalnike, navedene v nadaljevanju.
Labour costs in the sense of yearly average wages are unaffected by the exclusion of yarns from the product scope and the conclusions in recital 77 of the provisional Regulation are therefore herewith confirmed.
Izključitev preje iz obsega izdelka ni vplivala na stroške dela v smislu povprečnih plač na leto, zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 77 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Union industry — labour costs
Industrija Unije – stroški dela
Yearly wages (EUR)
Plače na leto (EUR)
Profitability and ROI are unaffected by the exclusion of yarns from the product scope and the conclusions in recitals 78-81 of the provisional Regulation are therefore herewith confirmed.
Izključitev preje iz obsega izdelka ni vplivala na dobičkonosnost in donosnost naložb, zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 78 do 81 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Union industry — profitability & ROI
Industrija Unije – dobičkonosnost in DN
Net profit (as % of turnover)
Čisti dobiček (kot % prometa)
The cash flow situation of the Union industry is unaffected by the exclusion of yarns from the product scope and the conclusion in recital 83 of the provisional Regulation is therefore herewith confirmed.
Izključitev preje iz obsega izdelka ni vplivala na stanje denarnega toka industrije Unije, zato se sklepna ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 83 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Union industry — cash flow
Industrija Unije – denarni tok
The level of investments of the Union industry is unaffected by the exclusion of yarns from the product scope and the conclusions in recital 85 of the provisional Regulation are therefore herewith confirmed.
Izključitev preje iz obsega izdelka ni vplivala na stopnjo naložb industrije Unije, zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 85 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Union industry — investments
Industrija Unije – naložbe
Comments received following disclosure of provisional findings
Pripombe, prejete po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev
One interested party claimed that the Commission should have analysed injury (and also causation) on a segment-specific basis, i.e. for each of the main product types separately.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi morala Komisija analizirati škodo (in tudi vzroke) po posameznih segmentih, tj. ločeno za vse glavne vrste izdelka.
This party considered that the main product types were too different from each other to be analysed as a whole.
Ta stran je menila, da so glavne vrste izdelka preveč različne, da bi jih lahko analizirali kot celoto.
It should first of all be recalled that any conclusions concerning dumping and injury can only be drawn for the product concerned and the like product as a whole.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da je mogoče o dampingu in škodi sklepati le za zadevni izdelek in podobni izdelek kot celoto.
If claims exist about the definition of the product concerned, these should be analysed in that context and should not result in separate injury analysis depending on the various product types covered by the investigation.
Če obstajajo zahtevki glede opredelitve zadevnega izdelka, jih je treba analizirati v tem okviru in ne smejo povzročiti ločene analize škode, odvisno od različnih vrst izdelkov, ki jih zajema preiskava.
As mentioned in recitals 13 to 23 above, the product scope of this investigation has been amended at the definitive stage of the investigation by the exclusion of yarns.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 13 do 23, je bil obseg izdelka te preiskave v zaključni fazi preiskave z izključitvijo preje spremenjen.
Any conclusion on dumping and injury can only be made on this newly defined product concerned and like product as a whole.
Sklepne ugotovitve glede dampinga in škode je mogoče oblikovati le o tem, na novo opredeljenem zadevnem izdelku in podobnem izdelku kot celoti.
For these reasons the above claim cannot be accepted.
Iz teh razlogov navedenega zahtevka ni mogoče sprejeti.
The same interested party argued that the data presented for the Union industry was not coherent.
Ista zainteresirana stran je trdila, da podatki, prikazani za industrijo Unije, niso skladni.
In particular, it considered that the Commission was wrong in sometimes providing data from the entire Union industry whereas on other occasions use had been made from the verified data from the sampled producers only.
Zlasti je menila, da je Komisija ravnala napačno, ker je v nekaterih primerih navedla podatke iz celotne industrije Unije, medtem ko so bili v drugih primerih uporabljeni preverjeni podatki le za vzorčene proizvajalce.
In respect of this claim it should firstly be noted that sampling is a procedure expressly provided for under Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to deal with cases where it is not possible to investigate certain groups of economic operators in detail.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je najprej treba opozoriti, da je vzorčenje postopek, ki je izrecno določen v členu 17 osnovne uredbe, da se lahko obravnavajo primeri, v katerih ni mogoče podrobno preiskati nekaterih skupin gospodarskih subjektov.
The selected sample of Union producers has been considered as representative for the whole Union industry and no substantiated claims stating the contrary have been submitted by interested parties.
Izbrani vzorec proizvajalcev Unije je bil obravnavan kot reprezentativen za celotno industrijo Unije in zainteresirane strani niso predložile nobene utemeljene trditve, s katero bi temu nasprotovale.
Therefore, as already mentioned in recital 66 of the provisional Regulation, all the injury indicators, except those concerning sales volume and market share, were established on the basis of information collected from and verified at the premises of the sampled Union producers.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 66, so bili zato vsi kazalniki škode, razen tistih v zvezi z obsegom prodaje in tržnim deležem, določeni na podlagi informacij, ki so bile zbrane od vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in preverjene v njihovih prostorih.
The sales volume of the Union industry comprising all Union producers was a prerequisite for the calculation of Union consumption, and in turn both the sales volume and the Union consumption were necessary for determining the market share of the Union industry.
Obseg prodaje industrije Unije, ki zajema vse proizvajalce Unije, je bil pogoj za izračun potrošnje Unije, prav tako pa sta bila obseg prodaje in potrošnja Unije potrebna za določitev tržnega deleža industrije Unije.
Another interested party argued that the imports from the PRC from producers related to the sampled Union producers, as mentioned in recital 58 of the provisional Regulation, should have been added to the sales of the producers concerned.
Druga zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi se moral uvoz iz LRK od proizvajalcev, povezanih z vzorčenimi proizvajalci Unije, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 58 začasne uredbe, dodati prodaji zadevnih proizvajalcev.
Given that the products in question are only re-sold by the Union producers concerned, the addition of these imports to their sales volume would distort the picture does not therefore appear justified.
Ker zadevne izdelke ponovno prodajajo le zadevni proizvajalci Unije, bi dodajanje tega uvoza njihovemu obsegu prodaje izkrivilo prikazane podatke, zato se ne zdi upravičeno.
In any case, as already stated in recitals 62 and 63 above, the volume of these imports is limited.
Obseg tega uvoza je v vsakem primeru omejen, kot je že navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 62 in 63.
As mentioned in the same recitals above, also the market shares would be affected only to a minimal extent without altering the trends of the relating injury indicators.
Kot je navedeno v istih izjavah, bi to tudi na tržne deleže le malo vplivalo in ne bi spremenilo gibanja povezanih kazalnikov škode.
One interested party mentioned that the Commission had not explained why the sales for captive use had been included in the sales figures of the Union industry.
Ena zainteresirana stran je navedla, da Komisija ni pojasnila, zakaj je bila prodaja za lastno uporabo vključena v podatke o prodaji industrije Unije.
It claimed that the Commission should have analysed the captive market independently from the free market.
Trdila je, da bi Komisija morala analizirati trg za lastno uporabo neodvisno od prostega trga.
In this respect it is important to underline that sales for captive use were included in the Union industry’s sales volumes and market share analysis as it was found that these sales did compete with imports.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je bila prodaja za lastno uporabo vključena v obseg prodaje industrije Unije in analizo tržnega deleža, ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da je ta prodaja konkurirala uvozu.
Indeed, the investigation had established that the quantities used for captive use, by the companies concerned in the Union, could in principle be substituted by purchased glass fibres, e.g. if market circumstances and/or financial considerations would trigger such a change.
V preiskavi je bilo dejansko ugotovljeno, da bi se lahko količine, uporabljene za lastno uporabo zadevnih družb v Uniji, načeloma nadomestile s kupljenimi steklenimi vlakni, npr. če bi tržne okoliščine in/ali finančni vidiki povzročili takšno spremembo.
They have therefore been included in the Union market analysis.
Zato so bile vključene v analizo trga Unije.
In any case, should captive sales be excluded from the analysis, the trends in sales would show no substantive changes.
Če bi se prodaja za lastno uporabo izključila iz analize, gibanja prodaje v nobenem primeru ne bi pokazala bistvenih sprememb.
The Union industry questioned the average Union sales prices of the Union industry as summarised in table 10 of the provisional Regulation.
Industrija Unije je podvomila v povprečne prodajne cene industrije Unije, ki so za Unijo navedene v preglednici 10 začasne uredbe.
It suspected a calculation error and claimed that, in reality, the drop in sales prices over the period considered was more significant than the reported 2 %.
Domnevala je, da gre za napako v izračunu, in trdila, da je bilo dejansko znižanje prodajnih cen v obravnavanem obdobju večje od navedenega 2 % znižanja.
In view of this allegation, the calculation of the average Union sales prices of the sampled Union producers was reviewed.
Zaradi te trditve je bil izračun povprečnih prodajnih cen Unije pri vzorčenih proizvajalcih Unije pregledan.
The calculation was based on verified sales prices and was found to be accurate.
Izračun je temeljil na preverjenih prodajnih cenah in ugotovljeno je bilo, da je pravilen.
However, in view of the exclusion of yarns from the product scope, the average sales prices had to be recalculated by excluding yarns and the revised average sales prices are reported in table 11 above.
Vendar je bilo treba zaradi izključitve preje iz obsega izdelka ponovno izračunati povprečne prodajne cene z izključitvijo preje, pri čemer so spremenjene povprečne prodajne cene prikazane v preglednici 11.
Two of the sampled producers questioned some of the adjustments made on their submitted profitability figures.
Dva od vzorčenih proizvajalcev sta podvomila v nekatere prilagoditve njunih podatkov o dobičkonosnosti.
The contested adjustments referred to intra-company transfers, changes in accounting and certain extraordinary elements which were considered by the Commission to unnecessarily distort the resulting profit figures.
Sporne prilagoditve so zadevale prenose znotraj družb, spremembe v obračunavanju in nekatere izredne elemente, za katere je Komisija menila, da po nepotrebnem izkrivljajo končne podatke o dobičku.
The adjustments were contested as the producers concerned considered that important costs were consequently not shown, although they had been incurred and in some cases could even be linked to the dumped imports.
Zadevna proizvajalca sta prilagoditve izpodbijala, ker sta menila, da zaradi njih niso bili prikazani pomembni stroški, čeprav so nastali in bi lahko bili v nekaterih primerih celo povezani z dampinškim uvozom.
The adjustments which had been made on the profitability figures of the two companies were reviewed and they were found again to be justified.
Prilagoditve podatkov o dobičkonosnosti, ki so bile izvedene za dve družbi, so bile pregledane in ponovno je bilo ugotovljeno, da so upravičene.
This claim, therefore, had to be dismissed.
To trditev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
In the absence of any other claim or comments, and with the modifications indicated in recitals 55 to 80 above, the conclusions in recitals 66 to 86 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih trditev ali pripomb, se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 66 do 86 začasne uredbe, kot so bile spremenjene z uvodnimi izjavami 55 do 80, potrdijo.
In the absence of any other claim or comments, the conclusions in recitals 87 to 89 in the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih trditev ali pripomb, se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 87 do 89 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Some parties reiterated the claim that, in view of the volume and prices of imports from the PRC, there was no causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the imports concerned.
Nekatere strani so ponovno trdile, da glede na obseg in cene uvoza iz LRK ni vzročne zveze med škodo, ki jo je imela industrija Unije, in zadevnim uvozom.
In particular, it was claimed again that the average import price of these imports had remained substantially stable throughout the period considered and that the Union industry had managed to maintain profitability at levels close to the mentioned target profit during the years 2007 and 2008 when the most significant increase in Chinese import volumes occurred.
Zlasti so ponovno trdile, da je povprečna uvozna cena tega uvoza v obravnavanem obdobju v glavnem ostala stabilna ter da je industrija Unije uspela ohraniti podobne stopnje dobičkonosnosti, kot je bil navedeni ciljni dobiček v letih 2007 in 2008, ko se je obseg kitajskega uvoza najbolj povečal.
A reply to these claims was already contained in recitals 94 and 95 of the provisional Regulation, which are hereby confirmed.
Odgovor na te trditve je že vključen v uvodni izjavi 94 in 95 začasne uredbe, ki se tako potrdita.
Moreover, as already indicated in recital 107 of the provisional Regulation, it cannot be concluded that the causal link is broken simply on the basis of the development of a limited number of injury indicators looked at for a limited part of the period considered; on the contrary, the overall development of all injury indicators over the whole period considered should be assessed.
Poleg tega, kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 107 začasne uredbe, ni mogoče sklepati, da vzročne zveze ni več, le na podlagi razvoja omejenega števila kazalnikov škode, upoštevanih za omejen del obravnavanega obdobja. Ravno nasprotno, oceniti bi bilo treba celoten razvoj vseh kazalnikov škode v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
The provisional analysis had already shown that imports of the product concerned have caused price depression on the Union market throughout the period considered and largely undercut the Union industry sales prices in the IP.
Že začasna analiza je pokazala, da je uvoz zadevnih izdelkov povzročil padanje cen na trgu Unije v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju in znatno nelojalno znižal prodajne cene industrije Unije v OP.
This aggressive strategy of gaining market shares by consistently selling at prices undercutting the Union industry prices had not resulted in a serious deterioration of the Union industry profitability before the IP only because of the relatively high levels of Union consumption which mitigated the effect of the injurious dumping.
Ta agresivna strategija pridobivanja tržnih deležev s stalno prodajo po cenah, nižjih od cen industrije Unije, ni povzročila velikega zmanjšanja dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije pred OP zaradi sorazmerno visokih ravni potrošnje Unije, ki so ublažile učinek škodljivega dampinga.
However, the developments during the IP confirm that as soon as the market conditions deteriorated the material injury caused by the dumped imports displayed all its effects.
Vendar razvoj v OP potrjuje, da so se vsi škodljivi učinki dampinškega uvoza izrazili takoj, ko so se tržni pogoji poslabšali.
The claims mentioned in recital 99 above are therefore dismissed.
Zato se trditve iz uvodne izjave 99 zavrnejo.
In view of the exclusion of yarns from the product scope, the import data had to be revised as follows:
Zaradi izključitve preje iz obsega izdelka je bilo treba podatke o uvozu spremeniti, kot je prikazano v preglednici:
Volumes (tonnes)
Obseg (v tonah)
Av. price/tonne (EUR)
Povprečna cena za tono (EUR)
Apart from the import volumes from the USA and Taiwan, which went down by ca. 35 % (IP) as compared to the volumes reported in table 17 of the provisional Regulation, imports from other countries appear to be influenced only to a very moderate extent by the exclusion of yarns.
Razen na obseg uvoza iz ZDA in Tajvana, ki se je zmanjšal za približno 35 % (OP) v primerjavi z obsegom, prikazanim v preglednici 17 začasne uredbe, je izključitev preje očitno le malo vplivala na uvoz iz drugih držav.
Several interested parties reiterated the claim that the economic crisis rather than the dumped imports had caused the injury to the Union industry — or, alternatively, that the economic crisis was the main cause of injury while imports from the PRC were at most only a second, additional factor.
Več zainteresiranih strani je ponovno trdilo, da je škodo industriji Unije prej povzročila gospodarska kriza kot pa dampinški uvoz ali, drugače rečeno, da je bila gospodarska kriza glavni vzrok za škodo, medtem ko je bil uvoz iz LRK kvečjemu drugi, dodatni dejavnik.
In this respect it was argued that there was a correlation between consumption and profitability and that the profitability only deteriorated when the demand collapsed.
V zvezi s tem so trdile, da obstaja korelacija med potrošnjo in dobičkonosnostjo ter da se dobičkonosnost poslabša šele, ko ni več povpraševanja.
At the same time, it was argued, there would be no correlation between EU market share, sales prices and profitability of the Union industry, on the one hand and the EU market share and sales prices of Chinese imports on the other.
Hkrati so trdile, da naj ne bi bilo korelacije med tržnim deležem EU, prodajnimi cenami in dobičkonosnostjo industrije Unije na eni strani ter tržnim deležem EU in prodajnimi cenami kitajskega uvoza na drugi.
It was also claimed that the Commission would not have properly assessed the injurious effects of the downturn in EU consumption and consequently acted in violation with Article 3(7) of the basic Regulation.
Prav tako so trdile, da naj Komisija ne bi pravilno ocenila škodljivih vplivov upada potrošnje EU in bi posledično kršila člen 3(7) osnovne uredbe.
The first part of the above claim has extensively been dealt with in recitals 99-102 of the provisional Regulation.
Prvi del teh trditev je bil obsežno obravnavan v uvodnih izjavah 99 do 102 začasne uredbe.