natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This part of the memorandum was published in the annual report for 1995 (p. 219).
Ta del obvestila so objavili avtorji poročila za leto 1995 (str. 219).
Memorandum from the French authorities to the Commission sent on 9 September 2008.
Obvestilo francoskih organov Komisiji z dne 9. septembra 2008.
See point 5 in the annex to that memorandum, which lists different acts including for example ‘a ministerial letter, or any other basis’.
Glej točko 5 priloge k temu obvestilu, v kateri so navedeni različni akti, kot je „dopis ministra ali katera koli druga podlaga“.
It may be borne in mind that a judgment closing compulsory winding-up proceedings without penalty, on the ground that the assets are insufficient, prevents the creditor from reopening proceedings: his claim is definitively lost.
Naj opozorimo, da sodba o prenehanju zaradi nezadostnosti sredstev brez kazni po koncu sodnega postopka likvidacije vključuje prepoved za upnika, da ponovno sproži pregon: njegova terjatev je torej dokončno izgubljena.
See recital 147.
Glej uvodno izjavo 147 tega sklepa.
The section of this Decision describing the measure explains the terms of the Law of 16 July 1980, the Decree of 20 May 2008 replacing the decree of 12 May 1981, and the Circular of 16 October 1989.
Izrazi iz upoštevnih besedil, zakona z dne 16. julija 1980, odloka z dne 20. maja 2008, ki nadomešča odlok z dne 12. maja 1981, in okrožnice z dne 16. oktobra 1989, so bili navedeni v oddelku tega sklepa o opisu ukrepa.
See Section 3.1.1.B(a)1 of this Decision, which in turn refers to Section IV.A.1, pp. 19-20, of the French authorities’ letter of 23 January 2008.
Glej oddelek 3.1.1.B(a)(1) tega sklepa, ki se sklicuje na razdelek IV, A, 1, str. 19–20, dopisa francoskih organov z dne 23. januarja 2008.
As the Commission’s expert points out, if the publicly owned establishment’s funds are insufficient, the possibilities open to the supervisory authority for dealing with the situation are limited.
Kot poudarja izvedenka Komisije, če namreč oseba javnega prava nima zadostnih sredstev, ima nadzorni organ omejene možnosti, da poskrbi za položaj.
The necessary funds may come from resources that were previously allocated to other expenditure and are now reallocated in order to honour the debt.
Potrebna sredstva lahko najprej izhajajo iz obstoječih sredstev, ki so namenjena za druge odhodke in nato prerazporejena za plačilo dolga.
They may come from the sale of assets or an increase in charges, if those courses are feasible.
Nato lahko izhajajo iz prodaje premoženja ali povišanja tarif, če so ti prihodki mogoči.
The establishment may also borrow.
Oseba javnega prava lahko tudi vzame posojilo.
But if these few possibilities are not feasible, the only solution remaining is to obtain funding from the State as shareholder.
Če pa teh nekaj možnosti ni mogočih, je rešitev samo dotacija države delničarke.
In cases where continuity of public service is not a requirement.
Če ne obstaja zahteva po kontinuiteti javne službe.
Expert’s report, section I.2.A.2, p. 18.
Poročilo izvedenke, oddelek I.2.A.2, str. 18.
Article 620-1 of the Commercial Code.
Člen L 620-1 trgovinskega zakonika.
Article 640-1 of the Commercial Code provides that ‘a procedure is established for winding up under the supervision of a court which is open to any debtor in any of the categories referred to in Article L 640-2 of the Commercial Code who is insolvent and whose reconstruction is manifestly impossible’.
Člen L 640-1 trgovinskega zakonika določa, da „se uvede postopek sodne likvidacije, ki je na voljo vsakemu dolžniku iz člena L 640-2, katerega plačila so bila ustavljena in ki ga očitno ni mogoče sanirati“.
Charges for services in the reserved area have to be approved by ARCEP, the postal regulator.
Tarife za storitve, ki spadajo v rezervirani sektor, odobri poštni regulator ARCEP.
Charges for universal services are restricted by ARCEP.
Tarife za storitve, ki spadajo v univerzalni sektor, omeji ARCEP.
See Section 4.1.1.A(b)3 of this Decision.
Glej oddelek 4.1.1.A(b)(3) tega sklepa.
See paragraphs 112 and 113 of the French authorities’ letter of 23 January 2008.
Glej odstavka 112 in 113 obvestila, ki so ga francoski organi poslali 23. januarja 2008.
See Section 4.1.1.A(b)3.
Glej oddelek 4.1.1.A(b)(3) tega sklepa.
According to the French regulator, ARCEP, regulation extends to the activities of postal services comprising the clearance, sorting, transport and delivery of postal items in regular rounds.
Glede na francoski regulativni organ (ARCEP) področje regulacije zajema dejavnosti poštnih storitev, ki vključujejo pobiranje, sortiranje, odpravo in razdeljevanje poštnih pošiljk v okviru rednih dostavnih poti.
It does not include the distribution of unaddressed advertising material, urban parcel deliveries, and express deliveries.
Izključeni so: razdeljevanje nenaslovljenega reklamnega gradiva, kurirska pošta in hitra pošta.
See the strategic presentation of the annual performance plan.
Glej strateško predstavitev letnega načrta uspešnosti.
For a more detailed account of the position of the French authorities see in particular Section 3.1.1.B(a)2 of this Decision.
Za več podrobnosti o stališču francoskih organov glej zlasti oddelek 3.1.1.B(a)(2) tega sklepa.
Administrative Court of Appeal, Lyon, 6 June 1996, Société fermière de Campoloro, No 95LY00935.
Cour administrative d’appel (upravno pritožbeno sodišče), Lyon, 6. junij 1996, Société fermière de Campoloro, št. 95LY00935.
Bon cited in footnote 37.
Bon, glej opombo 37.
Series A, No 37.
Série A, št. 37.
See Memorandum transmitted on 27 October 2009.
Glej obvestilo z dne 27. oktobra 2009.
Council of State, 29 December 2004, Société d’aménagement des coteaux de Saint-Blaine, No 257804: compensation in respect of public easements is possible when the owner bears a specific and exorbitant burden out of proportion to the public interest objective pursued.Administrative Court of Appeal, Bordeaux, 14 October 2003, Mr and Mrs Claude X., No 99BX01530: disruption to motor vehicle traffic on local roads damaged in a landslip may cause abnormal and special loss to the owner who thereby finds himself isolated.
Sodišče Conseil d’Etat, 29. december 2004, Sté d’aménagement des coteaux de Saint-Blaine, št. 257804: odškodnina za obveznosti javne službe je mogoča, kadar lastnik nosi posebno in preveliko breme, nesorazmerno z zastavljenim ciljem v splošnem interesu.Cour administrative d’appel (upravno pritožbeno sodišče), Bordeaux, 14. oktober 2003, M. in Mme Claude X., št. 99BX01530: prekinitev avtomobilskega prometa na občinskih cestah, poškodovanih zaradi zemeljskega usada, lahko lastniku, ki je odrezan od sveta, povzroči neobičajno in posebno škodo.
The administrative judge held, in particular, that the duration of the loss (traffic was disrupted for seven months — the time taken to carry out the work required) lent it an abnormal and specific character, placing a greater than usual burden on the two users of the public highway, and that compensation needed therefore to be provided.Administrative Court, Montpellier, 23 June 1999, Mr Van der Velden, No 97-03716: The once-and-for-all closure of a camp site because of a major risk of flooding caused the owner an abnormal and specific injury such as to entitle him to compensation in so far as the closure brought the interested party’s only professional activity to an end and caused the total loss of the goodwill relating to his business.
Upravno sodišče meni, da je škoda zaradi trajanja (promet je bil med deli prekinjen sedem mesecev) neobičajna in posebna ter presega stroške, ki jih imata uporabnika javne ceste običajno, zato jima je treba izplačati odškodnino.Tribunal administratif (upravno sodišče), Montpellier, 23. junij 1999, M. Van der Velden, št. 97-03716: dokončno zaprtje kampinga zaradi velike nevarnosti poplave je lastniku povzročilo neobičajno in posebno škodo, zaradi katere ima pravico do odškodnine, ker je to zaprtje povzročilo ustavitev edine poklicne dejavnosti zadevne osebe in popolno izgubo poslovnih sredstev.
The concept of legitimate error such as to impart legal effects is linked to the theory of appearance.
Pojem upravičene napake, ki ima lahko pravne učinke, je povezan s teorijo navideznosti.
According to Cornu’s Vocabulaire Juridique, appearance is ‘the aspect resulting — intentionally or otherwise — from the combination of external signs through which states and functions (status as representative, heir, owner, etc.) normally manifest themselves and that give rise to the belief that the person invested with these signs really does possess such a state or function’.
V skladu s Cornujevim pravnim glosarjem je navideznost „videz, ki – namerno ali nenamerno – izhaja iz skupka zunanjih znakov, s katerimi se navadno izražajo stanje, funkcija (pooblaščenec, dedič, lastnik …) in na podlagi katerih se verjame, da je oseba s temi znaki dejansko v tem stanju ali funkciji“.
The theory of appearance is a ‘praetorian theory according to which appearance alone is enough to produce effects in respect of third parties who, following a legitimate error, have been unaware of the real state of affairs’.
Teorija navideznosti je „teorija, ki jo je izdelalo sodišče in na podlagi katere sam videz zadostuje za povzročitev učinkov v zvezi s tretjimi osebami, ki so na podlagi upravičene napake spregledale realnost“.
The theory of appearance is used in case law and has even led to some high-profile outcomes (ECHR, 7 June 2001, Kress).
Teorija navideznosti se uporablja v sodni praksi, na njeni podlagi pa so bile celo sprejete zelo znane rešitve (Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, 7. junij 2001).
It is used in private law when it is necessary to impart legal effects to a contract in respect of which one of the parties has legitimately relied on simple appearance.
Uporablja se v zasebnem pravu, kadar je treba ustvariti pravne učinke pogodbe, katere ena od strank se je upravičeno zanašala samo na videz.
The examples of apparent domicile or, in public law, of de facto officials whose decisions are likely to remain legitimate may also be cited.
Navesti je mogoče tudi primer navideznega prebivališča, v javnem pravu pa na primer dejanskih uradnikov, katerih odločitve lahko ostanejo zakonite.
The theory of appearance has the advantage of making it easier to demonstrate the existence of a legal attribute or legal effect not expressly and explicitly affirmed by any legislation.
Njena prednost je, da olajša dokaz obstoja pravne lastnosti ali pravnega učinka, kadar njena oziroma njegova prisotnost ni izrecno in eksplicitno potrjena z nobenim besedilom.
Distinction drawn on the basis of the developments of the thesis of S. Carpi-Petit, Les successions en droit administratif, PUR, 2006.
Razlikovanje, opravljeno na podlagi razvoja trditve S. Carpi-Petita, Les successions en droit administratif(Nasledstva v upravnem pravu), PUR, 2006.
This emerges from the Decree of 15 July 2002 (Official Journal of the French Republic of 23 July 2002), establishing the means of winding up the Université thématique d’Agen, Article 1 of which provides that the liquidator is responsible for ‘proposing to the Minister for Higher Education that the assets, claims, debts and balance of the liquidation account remaining at the end of the winding-up period be distributed between Bordeaux I and Bordeaux IV universities’.
To izhaja iz odloka z dne 5. julija 2002 (JORF, 23. julij 2002), s katerim so določena podrobna pravila za likvidacijo tematske univerze v Agenu in katerega člen 1 določa, da je likvidator pristojen, da „ministru za visoko šolstvo predlaga porazdelitev premoženja, terjatev, dolgov in preostanek likvidacijske mase po koncu likvidacije med univerzi Bordeaux I in Bordeaux IV“.
Decree No 53-404 of 11 May 1953, winding up the Caisse de compensation pour la décentralisation de l’industrie aéronautique, Official Journal of the French Republic of 12 May 1953, Article 3: ‘in accordance with Article 7 of the above-mentioned decree of 24 May 1938, the installations and plant belonging to the Caisse and the sums still available after the discharge of liabilities will become the property of the State’ (in this case, the balance is obviously positive).
Odlok št. 53-404 z dne 11. maja 1953 o likvidaciji izravnalnega sklada za decentralizacijo letalske industrije, JORF, 12.5.1953, člen 3: „V skladu s členom 7 zgoraj navedenega odloka z dne 24. maja 1938 bodo naprave in oprema, ki pripadajo skladu, ter zneski, ki bodo po poravnavi dolgov ostali na voljo, postali last države“ (tu je očitno, da je saldo pozitiven).
Article 2 of Decree No 75-926 of 6 October 1975 relating to the abolition of the Bourse d’échanges de logements: ‘transactions for paying the debts, recovering the claims and liquidating the assets of the Bourse d’échanges de logements’, and (if appropriate) legal proceedings for the purposes both of bringing and defending actions in connection with the Bourse will fall within the competence of the Minister for Economic Affairs and Finance.
Odlok št. 75-926 z dne 6. oktobra 1975 o ukinitvi stanovanjske borze, člen 2: Za postopke plačila dolgov, izterjave terjatev in likvidacije premoženja stanovanjske borze ter, po potrebi, sodne postopke za tožbo in za obrambo, ki jo zadevajo, bo pristojen minister za gospodarstvo in finance.
Carpi-Petit, Les successions en droit administratif, PUR, 2006.
Les successions en droit administratif (Nasledstva v upravnem pravu), S. Carpi-Petit, PUR, 2006.
Judgment of 24 February 2004, winding up Les Houillères de bassin du centre et du Midi (Official Journal of the French Republic of 28 February 2004): transfer of the activities, assets, rights and obligations to Charbonnage de France.Order No 59-80 of 7 January 1959, reorganising the tobacco and matches tax monopolies: creation of the publicly owned establishment SEITA, with allocation of funds.Decree No 65-116 of 17 December 1965 concerning the unification of the Régie autonome des pétroles and the Bureau de recherches du pétrole: ‘all the assets, rights and obligations of the Régie autonome des pétroles and of the Bureau de recherches de pétrole shall be transferred ipso jure to the Entreprise de recherches et d’activités pétrolières’.
Odlok z dne 24. februarja 2004 o razpustitvi Houillères de bassin du centre et du Midi (JORF, 28.2.2004): prenos dejavnosti, premoženja, pravic in obveznosti na Charbonnage de France.Sklep št. 59-80 z dne 7. januarja 1959 o reorganizaciji davčnih monopolov za tobak in vžigalice: ustanovitev osebe javnega prava SEITA z dotacijo.Odlok št. 65-116 z dne 17. decembra 1965 o združitvi Régie autonome des pétroles in Bureau de recherches du pétrole: „vse premoženje, pravice in obveznosti Régie autonome des pétroles in Bureau de recherchesse polnopravno prenesejo na podjetje za naftne raziskave in dejavnosti“.
Article 2 of Decree No 67-796 relating to the unification of the Mines domaniales de potasse d’Alsace and the Office national industriel de l’Azote: ‘all the assets, rights and obligations of the Mines domaniales de potasse d’Alsace and the Office national industriel de l’azote shall be transferreed ipso jure to the Entreprise minière et chimique’.
Odlok št. 67-796 o združitvi Mines domaniales de potasse d’Alsace in Office national industriel de l’Azote, člen 2: „Vse premoženje, pravice in obveznosti Mines domaniales de potasse d’Alsace in Office national industriel de l’Azote se polnopravno prenesejo na Entreprise minière et chimique“.
Decree No 68-369 of 16 April 1968, merging the Houillères du bassin du centre et du midi: ‘all the assets, rights and obligations of the abolished Houillères du bassin shall be transferred ipso jure to the Houillères du bassin du centre et du midi’.
Odlok št. 68-369 z dne 16. aprila 1968 o združitvi Houillères de bassin du centre et du midi: „Vse premoženje, pravice in obveznosti tako ukinjenih premogovnikov se polnopravno prenesejo na Houillères de bassin du centre et du midi“.
Decree No 69-69 of 24 January 1969 relating to the transfer of the ORTF: ‘as from 1 January 1969, the movable and immovable assets, rights and obligations of the Office de coopération radiophonique shall be transferred to the ORTF’.
Odlok št. 69-69 z dne 24. januarja 1969 o prenosu ORTF: „S 1. januarjem 1969 se vse premičnine in nepremičnine, pravice in obveznosti urada za radijsko sodelovanje prenesejo na ORTF“.
Article 2 of Decree No 93-1176 of 13 October 1993, winding up the publicly owned establishment of l’Opéra de la Bastille: ‘the assets, rights and obligations of the Etablissement public de l’Opéra de la Bastille shall be transferred to the Etablissement public du parc de La Villette’.
Odlok št. 93-1176 z dne 13. oktobra 1993 o razpustitvi osebe javnega prava Opéra de Bastille, člen 2: „Premoženje, pravice in obveznosti osebe javnega prava Opéra de la Bastille se prenesejo na osebo javnega prava parka La Villette“.
Decree No 2004-103 of 30 January 2004 relating to Ubifrance, the French agency for the international development of undertakings: ‘transfer to Ubifrance […] of the rights, obligations and immovable and movable assets of the Centre français du commerce extérieur’.
Odlok št. 2004-103 z dne 30. januarja 2004 o Ubifrance, francoski agenciji za mednarodni razvoj podjetij: „Na Ubifrance […] se prenesejo pravice, obveznosti, nepremičnine in premičnine Centre français du commerce extérieur“.
Article 6 of Law No 2004-105 of 3 February 2004, creating the Agence nationale pour la garantie des droits des mineurs: ‘Subject to the winding up, by decision of its general meeting, of the Association nationale de gestion des retraités des Charbonnages de France et des Houillères de bassin ainsi que de leurs ayants droit, the assets, rights and obligations of this association shall be transferred to the Agence nationale pour la garantie des droits des mineurs’.
Zakon št. 2004-105 z dne 3. februarja 2004 o ustanovitvi Agence nationale pour la garantie des droits des mineurs, člen 6: „Ob upoštevanju razpustitve združenja, imenovanega Association nationale de gestion des retraités des Charbonnages de France et des Houillères de bassin ainsi que de leurs ayants droit, se premoženje, pravice in obveznosti tega združenja na podlagi sklepa njegove generalne skupščine prenesejo na Agence nationale pour la garantie des droits des mineurs“.
Decree No 2004-186 of 26 February 2004, creating the Université en sciences des organisations and bringing about the decision of Paris-Dauphine:‘the assets, rights and obligations of Université Paris IX shall be transferred to Université Paris-Dauphine’.
Odlok št. 2004-186 z dne 26. februarja 2004 o ustanovitvi univerze za organizacijske vede in odločanje Pariz-Dauphine: „Premoženje, pravice in obveznosti univerze Pariz IX se prenesejo na univerzo Pariz-Dauphine“.
Article 2 of Law No 80-495 of 2 July 1980, amending the legal form of the Service d’exploitation industrielle des tabacs et allumettes: ‘the assets of the EPIC known as Service d’exploitation industriel des tabacs et allumettes shall be transferred to the company created by this law, in accordance with the procedures laid down by the competent authority’.
Zakon št. 80-495 z dne 2. julija 1980 o spremembi statusa Service d’exploitation industrielle des tabacs et allumettes: člen 2: „Premoženje osebe javnega prava industrijske in komercialne narave, imenovane Service d’exploitation industriel des tabacs et allumettes, se po pravilih, ki jih določi pristojni organ, prenese na družbo, ustanovljeno s tem zakonom“.
See also Decree No 80-1025 of 19 December 1980 relating to the transfers of assets, rights and obligations from the Caisse nationale des marchés de l’Etat, des collectivités et établissements publics to the company known as CEPME.Article 1 of Law No 88-50 of 18 January 1988 relating to the mutualisation of the Caisse nationale de crédit agricole: ‘The assets of the Caisse nationale de crédit agricole and those of the Fonds commun de garantie shall be transferred to the company specified in paragraph 1, above — holder of all of the rights and obligations of the Caisse nationale and of the Fonds commun de garantie, together with the guarantees and sureties attached to them’.
Glej tudi odlok št. 80-1025 z dne 19. decembra 1980 o prenosu premoženja, pravic in obveznosti Caisse nationale des marchés de l’Etat, des collectivités et établissements publics na družbo, imenovano CEPME.Zakon št. 88-50 z dne 18. januarja 1988 o prenosu Caisse nationale de crédit agricole na vzajemni sklad, člen 1: „Premoženje Caisse nationale de crédit agricole in premoženje Fonds commun de garantie pripadeta družbi, določeni v prvem odstavku zgoraj, ki je imetnica vseh pravic in obveznosti Caisse nationale de crédit agricole in Fonds commun de garantie, z jamstvi in poroštvi, ki so povezana z njimi“.
Decree of 19 April 1989, authorising the Centre d’études des systèmes d’information des administrations to transfer all of its assets, rights and obligations to the limited company Cesia and winding up this establishment.Law No 92-665 of 16 July 1992, adapting the legislation applicable to insurance and banking to the single European market: transfer to a limited company of all the assets, rights and obligations of the EPIC Caisse nationale de prévoyance.Decree No 2001-1213 of 19 December 2001, authorising the publicly owned State establishment Agence pour la diffusion de l’information technologique to transfer its assets to a limited company with the same name, winding up this public establishment and authorising the transfer of this company to the private sector.
Odlok z dne 19. aprila 1989 o dovoljenju za Centre d’études des systèmes d’information des administrations, da vse svoje premoženje, pravice in obveznosti prenese na delniško družbo, imenovano Cesia, in o razpustitvi te osebe javnega prava.Zakon št. 92-665 z dne 16. julija 1992 o prilagoditvi zakonodaje s področja zavarovanja in posojil evropskemu enotnemu trgu: prenos vsega premoženja, pravic in obveznosti EPIC Caisse nationale de prévoyance na delniško družbo.Odlok št. 2001-1213 z dne 19. decembra 2001 o dovoljenju za osebo javnega prava države, imenovano Agence pour la diffusion de l’information technologique, da svoje premoženje prenese na delniško družbo z enakim imenom, o razpustitvi te osebe javnega prava in dovoljenju za prenos te družbe v zasebni sektor.
The example may be referred to of the abolition of the Caisse nationale des marchés de l’Etat, des collectivités et établissements publics: Decree No 80-1025 of 19 December 1980 provides that the assets, rights and obligations of the publicly owned establishment shall be transferred to a public limited company (CEPME) and that the publicly owned establishment shall receive shares in exchange.
Sklicevati se je mogoče na primer postopka ukinitve Caisse nationale des marchés de l’Etat, des collectivités et établissements publics: odlok št. 80-1025 z dne 19. decembra 1980 določa, da se premoženje, pravice in obveznosti osebe javnega prava prenesejo na delniško družbo (CEPME), oseba javnega prava pa v zameno prejme delnice.
Then, by Decree No 80-1076 of 23 December 1980, the publicly owned establishment shall be abolished and its assets transferred to the State.
Nato je z odlokom št. 80-1076 z dne 23. decembra 1980 oseba javnega prava ukinjena, njeno premoženje pa preneseno na državo.
The same mechanism shall be put in place for abolishing the Agence pour la diffusion de l’information technologique (Decree No 2001-1213 of 19 December 2001).
Enak mehanizem je vzpostavljen za ukinitev Agence pour la diffusion de l’information technologique (odlok št. 2001-1213 z dne 19. decembra 2001).
‘Publicly owned establishments’, J-cl. admi. fasc.
„Etablissements publics“, J-cl. admi. fasc.