natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this respect it is noted that the purpose of the MET criteria is clearly set out under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation and the Commission applied with respect to APP these clearly set out rules when analyzing its MET claim.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je namen meril TGO jasno določen v členu 2(7) osnovne uredbe ter da je Komisija pri analizi zahtevka za TGO v primeru APP uporabila ta jasno določena pravila.
APP also claimed that the MET assessment had shortcomings, given that the verification of the reply to the anti-dumping questionnaire had established a ‘reliable’ cost of production, while the MET assessment points to a lack of ability to establish payments for inputs.
APP je tudi trdil, da je imela ocena TGO pomanjkljivosti, ker so pri preverjanju odgovora na protidampinški vprašalnik nastali „zanesljivi“ proizvodni stroški, medtem ko je bilo v oceni TGO ugotovljeno, da plačil za vložke ni mogoče določiti.
This interpretation of the findings has to be rejected as erroneous.
To razlago ugotovitev je treba zavrniti kot napačno.
It is recalled that the basic Regulation explicitly conditions the granting of MET and thus the reliability and use of an exporting producer's own price and cost data for the purpose of establishing normal value on the company successfully showing that it meets the requirements set out in Article 2(7)(c).
Opozoriti je treba, da osnovna uredba izrecno pogojuje odobritev TGO in s tem zanesljivost in uporabo podatkov o ceni in stroških proizvajalca izvoznika za določitev normalne vrednosti s tem, da družba uspešno dokaže, da izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 2(7)(c).
If the aforementioned claim by APP were to be accepted it would simply ‘by-pass’ the findings of the MET assessment and the provisions of Article 2(7)(c) by using other type of information collected for other purposes.
Če bi sprejeli navedeno trditev APP, bi enostavno „obšli“ ugotovitve ocene TGO in določbe člena 2(7)(c) z uporabo drugih vrst informacij, zbranih za druge namene.
This is not in conformity with the provisions of the basic Regulation.
To ni v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe.
It is recalled that for APP two out of the four related exporting producers were found to produce only the multi-ply paperboard.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bilo v primeru APP ugotovljeno, da dva od štirih povezanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov proizvajata samo večplastni karton.
Account taken of the fact that multi-ply paper board is excluded from the product scope as confirmed in recitals (40) and (41) above, it is concluded that the MET findings with respect to the two related exporting producers that produce only multi-ply paperboard within the APP group are not relevant for this proceeding.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je večplastni karton izključen iz obsega izdelka, kot potrjujeta uvodni izjavi (40) in (41), se sklene, da ugotovitve TGO v zvezi z dvema povezanima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma, ki proizvajata samo večplastni karton v okviru skupine APP, niso odločilne za ta postopek.
In the absence of any other comments concerning MET, recitals (31) to (51) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s TGO ni drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave (31) do (51) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments on IT, recitals (52) to (55) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede IO, se uvodne izjave od (52) do (55) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
No party disputed the selection of theUSA as an analogue country for the definitive determination.
Nobena stran ni nasprotovala izbiri Združenih držav Amerike (ZDA) za primerljivo državo za dokončno ugotovitev.
In the absence of any comments concerning the selection of the analogue country, recitals (56) to (63) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede izbire primerljive države, se uvodne izjave (56) do (63) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It is recalled that the normal value was calculated on the basis of the data provided by the sole cooperating producer in the analogue country (i.e. USA).
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila normalna vrednost izračunana na podlagi podatkov, ki sta jih predložila edini sodelujoči proizvajalec iz primerljive države (tj. Združenih držav Amerike).
Thus, normal value was established on the basis of prices of domestic sales of one US producer of the like product produced in the USA.
Zato je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi cen, ki jih je dosegel en proizvajalec iz ZDA z domačo prodajo podobnega izdelka, proizvedenega v ZDA.
During the IP this producer produced and sold in the US market the great majority of the types of the like product.
Med OP je ta proizvajalec na trgu ZDA proizvedel in prodal veliko večino vrst podobnega izdelka.
APP submitted that the Commission did not provide necessary information in relation to the normal value in the analogue country, such as comparability of the products, representativeness, cost structure, fair comparison mechanics and adjustments.
APP je navedel, da Komisija ni zagotovila potrebnih informacij v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo v primerljivi državi, kot so primerljivost izdelkov, reprezentativnost, stroškovna struktura, mehanizmi in prilagoditve za pošteno primerjavo.
In this respect it is noted that, as explained under recital (9) above, the Commission provided to the party all relevant information concerning the data used in order to calculate normal value that could be released without infringing the provisions of Article 19 of the basic Regulation, i.e. assuring at the same time that any confidential data provided by the sole US producer is treated as such and is not disclosed to other parties.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (9), strani zagotovila vse pomembne informacije v zvezi s podatki, ki so bili uporabljeni za izračun normalne vrednosti in ki ji jih je lahko sporočila, ne da bi kršila določbe člena 19 osnovne uredbe, tj. hkrati je zagotovila, da se morebitne zaupne informacije, ki jih je zagotovil edini proizvajalec iz ZDA, tudi tako obravnavajo in se ne razkrijejo drugim stranem.
The information provided to the exporting producer was meaningful and offered it the possibility to understand the methodology used in line with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Informacije, ki so bile zagotovljene kitajski strani, so bile tehtne in so strani omogočile, da razume metodologijo, uporabljeno v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (64) to (67) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave od (64) do (67) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
APP argued that the export sales of one of its companies cooperating with the investigation should not have been disregarded from the dumping margin calculation even if there are no matching products.
APP je trdil, da izvoza ene od njenih družb, ki sodelujejo pri preiskavi, ne bi smeli zanemariti pri izračunu stopnje dampinga, čeprav ni šlo za enake proizvode.
It was also argued that the export quantities of this company were not small but substantial.
Trdil je tudi, da obseg izvoza te družbe ni bil majhen ampak znaten.
With respect to these claims it is noted that the sales values of the transactions in question were considered for the establishment of the export prices but no normal value for these transactions could be established since there were no comparable product types in the analogue country and thus no comparison could be made.
V zvezi s temi trditvami je treba opozoriti, da so se prodajne vrednosti zadevnih transakcij upoštevale pri določitvi izvoznih cen, vendar za te transakcije ni bilo mogoče določiti normalne vrednosti, ker v primerljivi državi ni bilo primerljivih vrst izdelka in zato primerjava ni bila mogoča.
With respect to the export quantities of this particular company it is noted that they represented only a minor part of the total APP export sales and their price levels appeared to be in line with the overall APP export sales price levels.
V zvezi z obsegom izvoza te konkretne družbe je treba opozoriti, da je pomenil le manjši del skupnega izvoza APP in so se njihove ravni cen zdele v skladu s skupnimi ravnmi cen izvoza APP.
Finally, it should be pointed out that the great majority of export transactions were used for the purposes of determining whether or not the exports were dumped, i.e. those offering an absolute match to normal value established in the analogue country.
Nazadnje je treba poudariti, da je bila velika večina izvoznih transakcij uporabljena za ugotavljanje, ali je bil izvoz dampinški, tj. izvoz, ki se popolnoma ujema z normalno vrednostjo, določeno v primerljivi državi.
Thus, APP claims with respect to export price had to be rejected as they cannot put into question the finding of injurious dumping given that the basis for the calculation is clearly representative.
Trditve APP v zvezi z izvozno ceno je bilo torej treba zavrniti, ker ne morejo postaviti pod vprašaj ugotovitve škodljivega dampinga, saj je podlaga za izračun jasno reprezentativna.
The fact, that a matching normal value in the analogue country does not necessarily exist for each and every export transaction is inherent to such a finding.
S tako ugotovitvijo je neločljivo povezano dejstvo, da enaka normalna vrednost v primerljivi državi ne obstaja nujno za vsako izvozno transakcijo.
APP also submitted that the aforesaid export sales should have been used in the dumping margin calculations since the investigating authority has the possibility to identify similar product types used for the normal value calculation, adjust the export price to the normal value or construct a normal value to compare with the aforesaid export sales.
APP je tudi navedel, da bi navedeni izvoz moral biti uporabljen pri izračunu stopnje dampinga, ker ima preiskovalni organ možnost prepoznavanja podobnih vrst izdelka, uporabljenih pri izračunu normalne vrednosti, prilagoditi izvozno ceno normalni vrednosti ali konstruirati normalno vrednost za primerjavo z navedenim izvozom.
These claims had to be rejected as there were no product types in the analogue country that had been close enough to those exported to cover the differences by an adjustment for differences in physical characteristics.
Te trditve je bilo treba zavrniti, ker v primerljivi državi ni bilo takih vrst izdelka, ki bi bile dovolj podobne izvoženim izdelkom, da bi lahko izenačili razlike s prilagoditvijo razlik v fizikalnih lastnostih.
Equally, it was not possible to construct normal value for such product types.
Prav tako ni bilo mogoče konstruirati normalne vrednosti za take vrste izdelka.
Neither similar product types in other normal value transactions were identifiable, nor any basis was available to make adjustments or otherwise construct normal value using selling, general administrative expenses and profit assumptions.
V drugih transakcijah normalne vrednosti tudi ni bilo mogoče prepoznati podobnih vrst izdelka, niti ni bilo na voljo nobene podlage za prilagoditve ali drugačno konstruiranje normalne vrednosti z uporabo prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov ter predvidenega dobička.
APP requested clarifications with respect to the reasonable profit margin used for constructing export price in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
APP je zahteval pojasnila v zvezi z razumno stopnjo dobička, ki je bila uporabljena za konstruiranje izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission revisited this point following new developments.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija znova obravnavala to točko po novem razvoju dogodkov.
It is recalled that as explained in recital (71) of the provisional Regulation a reasonable profit rate, much lower than the target profit for the Union industry was used.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (71) osnovne uredbe, uporabljena razumna stopnja dobička, ki je bistveno nižja od ciljnega dobička industrije Unije.
The Commission reviewed the available data and decreased the profit margin rate used for constructing export price to a rate equal to the weighted average rate reported by a series of unrelated Union importers of the product concerned, i.e. 4,5 %.
Komisija je pregledala razpoložljive podatke in zmanjšala stopnjo dobička, uporabljeno za konstruiranje izvozne cene, na stopnjo, ki je enaka tehtani povprečni stopnji, ki jih je sporočila vrsta nepovezanih uvoznikov zadevnega izdelka v Uniji, tj. 4,5 %.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (68) to (71) of the provisional Regulation, as modified above, are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave (68) do (71) začasne uredbe, kakor so bile zgoraj spremenjene, potrdijo.
APP claimed to be unable to understand the basis of calculations of certain allowances with respect to normal value (namely the type of adjustments and their impact on the normal value) and export price (namely the methodology used and calculations made in order to arrive at several ratios).
APP je trdil, da ne more razumeti podlage za izračun nekaterih popravkov glede normalne vrednosti (tj. vrste prilagoditev in njihovega učinka na normalno vrednost) ter izvozne cene (tj. uporabljene metodologije in opravljenih izračunov, s katerimi se je doseglo več stopenj).
With respect to normal value adjustments, as explained under recitals (9) and (66) above, the Commission provided to APP all the relevant data that could be provided, account taken of the provisions on confidentiality in the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s prilagoditvami normalne vrednosti je Komisija, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (9) in (66), strani zagotovila vse ustrezne podatke, ki ji jih je lahko zagotovila ob upoštevanju določb o zaupnosti iz osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, the Commission checked with the cooperating party in the analogue country whether further information relating to adjustments could be disclosed in order to improve transparency.
Poleg tega je Komisija preverila pri sodelujoči strani iz primerljive države, ali se za izboljšanje preglednosti lahko razkrijejo nadaljnje informacije v zvezi s prilagoditvami.
Having obtained the analogue country producer's agreement, more detailed information was indeed provided to APP following provisional disclosure, further elaborating on the normal value adjustments.
S soglasjem proizvajalca iz primerljive države so se strani po začasnem razkritju res zagotovile podrobnejše informacije, ki natančneje pojasnjujejo prilagoditve normalne vrednosti.
With respect to export price adjustments it is noted that APP received full disclosure.
V zvezi s prilagoditvami izvozne cene je treba opozoriti, da se bile informacije razkrite APP v celoti.
Then, following APP's request, clarifications were provided to APP following provisional disclosure further elaborating on the export price adjustments.
Po zahtevku APP so bile strani nato po začasnem razkritju zagotovljena pojasnila, ki natančneje pojasnjujejo prilagoditve izvozne cene.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (72) and (73) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi (72) in (73) začasne uredbe potrdita.
No pertinent comments with respect to the dumping margin were submitted.
V zvezi s stopnjo dampinga niso bile predložene nobene zadevne pripombe.
In the absence of any other comments, recital (74) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodna izjava (74) začasne uredbe potrdi.
Taking into account the revised profit margin rate used for constructing export price for APP and on the basis of the methodology set out in recitals (31) to (73) of the provisional Regulation, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Ob upoštevanju popravljene stopnje dobička, ki je bila uporabljena za konstruiranje izvozne cene za APP, ter na podlagi metodologije iz uvodnih izjav (31) do (73) začasne uredbe so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot delež cene CIF meja Unije, brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
On the basis of the facts stated in recital (76) of the provisional Regulation, the country-wide definitive dumping margin for the PRC was established using the definitive dumping margin established for the cooperating companies with the highest individual duty rate, i.e. 63 %.
Na podlagi dejstev iz uvodne izjave (76) začasne uredbe je bila dokončna stopnja dampinga na ravni države za LRK določena z uporabo dokončne stopnje dampinga, ki je bila določena za sodelujoče družbe z najvišjo individualno stopnjo dajatve, tj. 63 %.
In the absence of any other comments, recital (76) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodna izjava (76) začasne uredbe potrdi.
The government of PRC commented that one of the representative producers was allegedly related to a Chinese company and thus should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry.
Kitajska vlada je pripomnila, da je bil en reprezentativni proizvajalec domnevno povezan s kitajsko družbo in bi zato moral biti izključen iz opredelitve industrije Unije.
The investigation however revealed that the products produced by the Chinese company referred to are not product concerned.
Vendar je preiskava razkrila, da izdelki, ki jih je proizvedla navedena kitajska družba, niso zadevni izdelek.
Therefore the relationship does not have any impact on the injury analysis nor on the inclusion of this Union producer in the definition of Union industry.
Zato nima ta povezava nobenega učinka na analizo škode niti na vključitev tega proizvajalca Unije v opredelitev industrije Unije.
In the absence of further comments on Union production, recitals (77) to (79) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nadaljnjih pripomb v zvezi s proizvodnjo Unije, se uvodne izjave (77) do (79) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of comments on Union consumption, recitals (80) to (82) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s potrošnjo Unije ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdijo uvodne izjave (80) do (82) začasne uredbe.
In the absence of comments on the level of imports into the Union from the PRC, recitals (83) to (84) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z ravnijo uvoza v Unijo iz LRK ni bilo pripomb, se uvodni izjavi (83) in (84) začasne uredbe potrdita.
To ensure that the dumping and undercutting and underselling calculations follow a coherent approach, and for the reasons set out in recitals (68) to (71), the undercutting calculation has been revised to exclude the export sales of a company within the group of one cooperating exporting producer.
Da se zagotovi skladen pristop pri izračunu dampinga, nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen in nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen ter zaradi razlogov iz uvodnih izjav (68) do (71), se je izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen popravil tako, da se je izključil izvoz družbe iz skupine enega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika.
Based on the modified dataset used for the calculation, and also due to a minor calculation correction, the rate of price undercutting in recital (87) was slightly revised.
Na podlagi spremenjene podatkovne zbirke, uporabljene za izračun, ter zaradi manjšega popravka izračuna se je stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen iz uvodne izjave (87) nekoliko popravila.
The dumped imports undercut the Union producers’ sales prices on average by 7,6 % in the IP.
Dampinški uvoz je v OP nelojalno znižal prodajne cene proizvajalcev Unije v povprečju za 7,6 %.
Economic situation of the Union industry and the representative Union producers
Gospodarski položaj industrije Unije in reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije
One of the coooperating Chinese exporting producers (APP) claimed that the injury analysis should be done at the level of a properly defined Union industry that should be limited to Union producers that support the complaint and cooperate with the investigation.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi analiza škode morala biti opravljena na ravni ustrezno opredeljene industrije Unije, ki bi morala biti omejena na proizvajalce Unije, ki podpirajo pritožbo in sodelujejo pri preiskavi.
That producer suggests that the conclusions concerning material injury would be different, were some indicators such as market share established at the level of such ‘properly defined’ Union industry.
Proizvajalec izvoznik trdi, da bi sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z znatno škodo bile drugačne, če bi bili nekateri kazalniki, kot so tržni delež, določeni na ravni take „ustrezno opredeljene“ industrije Unije.
The government of PRC commented that the injury analysis failed to analyze all injury indicators for the complainant and for the Union industry as a whole in a coherent and comprehensive fashion.
Kitajska vlada je pripomnila, da v okviru analize škode niso bili analizirani vsi kazalniki škode na skladen in celovit način za pritožnike in industrijo Unije kot celote.
Firstly it is noted that the statements of that producer seem to have been drawn on the basis of indicators calculated from different datasets and information than those established during the investigation and presented below and in the provisional Regulation.
Prvič, treba je opozoriti, da so izjave teh strani, kot se zdi, nastale na podlagi kazalnikov, ki so bili izračunani na podlagi drugih podatkovnih zbirk in informacij od teh, ki so bile ugotovljene med preiskavo ter so predstavljene v nadaljevanju in v osnovni uredbi.
Consequently, these conclusions are factually wrong and are thus irrelevant.
Te sklepne ugotovitve so posledično glede na dejstva napačne in zato nepomembne.
Secondly, it is the Commission's practice to evaluate macroeconomic factors for the indication of the injury suffered at the level of the Union industry as a whole, as it was explained in recital (89) of the provisional Regulation.
Drugič, Komisija ima prakso, da oceni makroekonomske dejavnike, s čimer se lahko preveri škoda na ravni celotne industrije Unije, kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (89) začasne uredbe.
In the present investigation, the Union industry was defined at the level of Union producers accounting for the total Union production (recital (77) of the provisional Regulation), regardless of whether producers supported the complaint or have been cooperating in the investigation.
V sedanji preiskavi je bila industrija Unije opredeljena na ravni proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo celotno proizvodnjo Unije (uvodna izjava (77) začasne uredbe), ne glede na to ali so proizvajalci podpirali pritožbo ali sodelovali s preiskavo.
Given this broad definition, the exporting producer claims that Union industry has not been defined ‘properly’ is rejected.
Glede na to široko opredelitev se zavrne trditev proizvajalcev izvoznikov, da industrija Unije ni bila „ustrezno“ opredeljena.
Microeconomic factors are analyzed at the level of the representative Union producers, regardless of whether these support the complaint or not.
Mikroekonomski dejavniki so analizirani na ravni reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije, ne glede na to ali ti podpirajo pritožbo ali ne.
The representative producers covered 58 % of the Union production.
Reprezentativni proizvajalci so pokrivali 58 % proizvodnje Unije.
None of the other Union producers came forward claiming that the Commission's conclusions on microeconomic factors would be unreliable or not substantiated.
Noben drug proizvajalec Unije ni trdil, da so sklepne ugotovitve Komisije o mikroekonomskih dejavnikih nezanesljive ali neutemeljene.
Therefore there are no reasons to put into question the findings established based on the information provided by the representative Union producers only.
Zato ni razloga, da bi postavili pod vprašaj ugotovitve, dognane na podlagi informacij, ki so jih zagotovili samo reprezentativni proizvajalci Unije.
Further comments on the level of cooperation by one of the representative Union producers were received.
Predložene so bile dodatne pripombe glede stopnje sodelovanja enega od reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije.