natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission shall set up a data portal as a single point of access to its structured data so as to facilitate linking and reuse for commercial and non-commercial purposes.
Komisija vzpostavi podatkovni portal, ki je enotna vstopna točka za dostop do njenih strukturiranih podatkov, da se olajšata povezovanje in ponovna uporaba za komercialne in nekomercialne namene.
Commission services will identify and progressively make available suitable data in their possession.
Službe Komisije opredelijo in postopoma zagotovijo dostop do ustreznih podatkov, katerih imetnice so.
The data portal may provide access to data of other Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies at their request.
Podatkovni portal lahko zagotavlja tudi dostop do podatkov drugih institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije na njihovo zahtevo.
Conditions for reuse of documents
Pogoji za ponovno uporabo dokumentov
Documents shall be made available for reuse without application unless otherwise specified and without restrictions or, where appropriate, an open licence or disclaimer setting out conditions explaining the rights of reusers.
Dokumenti so za ponovno uporabo na voljo brez zahtevka in brez omejitev, razen če je določeno drugače, ali po potrebi na podlagi odprtega dovoljenja ali izjave o omejeni odgovornosti, ki določa pogoje in pravice ponovnih uporabnikov.
Those conditions, which shall not unnecessarily restrict possibilities for reuse, may include the following:
Ti pogoji, ki po nepotrebnem ne omejujejo možnosti za ponovno uporabo, lahko vključujejo naslednje:
the obligation for the reuser to acknowledge the source of the documents;
obveznost ponovnega uporabnika, da navede vir dokumentov;
the obligation not to distort the original meaning or message of the documents;
obveznost, da se prvotnega pomena ali sporočila dokumentov ne izkrivlja;
the non-liability of the Commission for any consequence stemming from the reuse.
neodgovornost Komisije za katero koli posledico, ki izhaja iz ponovne uporabe.
Where it is necessary to apply other conditions to a particular class of documents, the inter-service group referred to in Article 12 will be consulted.
Če je za določeno vrsto dokumentov treba uporabiti druge pogoje, se posvetuje z medresorsko skupino iz člena 12
Individual applications for reuse of documents
Vložitev posebnih zahtevkov za ponovno uporabo dokumentov
Where an individual application for reuse is necessary, the Commission services shall clearly indicate this in the relevant document or notice pointing to it and provide an address to which the application is to be submitted.
Če je za ponovno uporabo potrebno vložiti poseben zahtevek, službe Komisije to jasno označijo v ustreznem dokumentu ali obvestilu o tem dokumentu ter navedejo naslov, na katerega je treba zahtevek poslati.
Individual applications for reuse shall be handled promptly by the relevant Commission service.
Posebne zahtevke za ponovno uporabo dokumentov brez odloga obravnava ustrezna služba Komisije.
An acknowledgement of receipt shall be submitted to the applicant.
Prosilcu se pošlje potrdilo o prejemu.
Within 15 working days from registration of the application, the Commission service or the Publications Office shall either allow reuse of the document requested and, where relevant, provide a copy of the document, or, in a written reply, indicate the total or partial refusal of the application, stating the reasons.
Služba Komisije ali Urad za publikacije v 15 delovnih dneh od evidentiranja zahtevka dovoli ponovno uporabo zahtevanega dokumenta in po potrebi zagotovi izvod dokumenta ali v pisnem odgovoru navede, da je zahtevek v celoti ali delno zavrnjen in razloge za to.
Where an application for reuse of a document concerns a very long document, a very large number of documents or the application needs to be translated, the time limit provided for in paragraph 2 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons for the extension are given.
Če se zahtevek za ponovno uporabo dokumenta nanaša na zelo dolg dokument, na zelo veliko število dokumentov ali če je treba zahtevek prevesti, se lahko rok iz odstavka 2 podaljša za 15 delovnih dni, pod pogojem, da se prosilca o tem vnaprej obvesti in navede podrobne razloge za podaljšanje.
Where an application for reuse of a document is refused, the Commission service or the Publications Office shall inform the applicant of the right to bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Union or to lodge a complaint with the European Ombudsman, under the conditions laid down in Articles 263 and 228, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Če se zahtevek za ponovno uporabo dokumenta zavrne, služba Komisije ali Urad za publikacije prosilca seznani, da ima pravico vložiti tožbo pri Sodišču Evropske unije ali pritožbo pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic pod pogoji iz člena 263 oziroma člena 228 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Where a refusal is based on point (b) of Article 2(2) of this Decision, the reply to the applicant shall include a reference to the natural or legal person who is the rightholder, where known, or alternatively to the licensor from which the Commission has obtained the relevant material, where known.
Če se zahtevek zavrne na podlagi točke (b) člena 2(2) tega sklepa, se prosilcu v odgovoru navede sklic na fizično ali pravno osebo (če je znana), ki je imetnik pravice, oziroma na izdajatelja licence (če je znan), ki je Komisiji poslal zadevni material.
Formats for documents available for reuse
Formati, ki so na voljo za ponovno uporabo
Documents shall be made available in any existing format or language version, in machine-readable format where possible and appropriate.
Dokumenti so na voljo v vsakem obstoječem formatu ali jezikovni različici ter, če je mogoče in smiselno, v strojno berljivem formatu.
This shall not imply an obligation to create, adapt or update documents in order to comply with the application, nor to provide extracts from documents where it would involve disproportionate effort, going beyond a simple operation.
To ne pomeni, da je treba dokumente ustvariti, prilagoditi ali posodobiti, da se ugodi zahtevku, ali zagotoviti izvlečke iz dokumentov, če bi to pomenilo nesorazmeren napor, ki presega enostavni postopek.
This Decision does not create any obligation for the Commission to translate the requested documents into any other official language versions than those already available at the moment of the application.
Ta sklep Komisije ne obvezuje, da zahtevane dokumente prevede v druge uradne jezikovne različice, ki ob vložitvi zahtevka ne obstajajo.
The Commission or the Publications Office may not be required to continue the production of certain types of documents or to preserve them in a given format with a view to the reuse of such documents by a natural or legal person.
Od Komisije ali Urada za publikacije ni mogoče zahtevati, da še naprej izdelujeta določene vrste dokumentov ali jih hranita v določenem formatu, da bi jih ponovno uporabljale fizične ali pravne osebe.
Rules on charging
Pravila o zaračunavanju pristojbin
The reuse of documents shall in principle be free of charge.
Ponovna uporaba dokumentov je načeloma brezplačna.
In exceptional cases, marginal costs incurred for the reproduction and dissemination of documents may be recovered.
V izjemnih primerih se lahko zaračunajo mejni stroški, nastali z reproduciranjem in razširjanjem dokumentov.
Where the Commission decides to adapt a document in order to satisfy a specific application, the costs involved in the adaptation may be recovered from the applicant.
Če se Komisija odloči prilagoditi dokument, da bi ugodila določenemu zahtevku, lahko stroške prilagoditve zaračuna prosilcu.
The assessment of the need to recover such costs shall take into account the effort necessary for the adaptation as well as the potential advantages the reuse may bring to the Union, for example in terms of spreading information on the functioning of the Union or in terms of enhancing the public image of the Institution.
Pri odločanju, ali so pristojbine potrebne, mora upoštevati napor, potreben za prilagoditev, in morebitne prednosti, ki bi jih ponovna uporaba lahko pomenila za Unijo, na primer z razširjanjem informacij o delovanju Unije ali zaradi izboljšanja javne podobe institucije.
Any applicable conditions and standard charges for the documents available for reuse shall be pre-established and published, through electronic means where possible and appropriate.
Vsi veljavni pogoji in standardne cene za dokumente, ki so na voljo za ponovno uporabo, se določijo in objavijo predhodno, če je mogoče in ustrezno v elektronski obliki.
The search for documents shall be facilitated by practical arrangements, such as asset-lists of main documents available for reuse.
Iskanje dokumentov se olajša s praktičnimi ukrepi, kot so seznami glavnih dokumentov, ki so na voljo za ponovno uporabo.
Non-discrimination and exclusive rights
Nediskriminacija in izključne pravice
Any applicable conditions for the reuse of documents shall be non-discriminatory for comparable categories of reuse.
Pogoji za ponovno uporabo dokumentov niso diskriminacijski do primerljivih kategorij ponovne uporabe.
The reuse of documents shall be open to all potential actors in the market.
Ponovna uporaba dokumentov je mogoča za vse morebitne udeležence na trgu.
No exclusive rights shall be granted.
Izključne pravice se ne dodelijo.
However, where an exclusive right is necessary for the provision of a service in the public interest, the validity of the reason for granting such an exclusive right shall be subject to regular review, and shall, in any event, be reviewed after 3 years.
Vendar če je izključna pravica potrebna za zagotavljanje storitve javnega interesa, se dodelitev takšne izključne pravice redno ponovno pregleduje, tj. najmanj vsake tri leta.
Any exclusive arrangement shall be transparent and made public.
Vsak dogovor o izključni pravici je pregleden in se objavi.
Exclusive rights may be granted to publishers of scientific and scholarly journals for articles based on the work of Commission officials for a limited period.
Izključne pravice se lahko za določen čas dodelijo založnikom znanstvenih in strokovnih revij za članke, ki temeljijo na delu uradnikov Komisije.
Inter-service group
Medslužbena skupina
An inter-service group shall be set up, chaired by the Director-General responsible for this Decision, or his representative.
Ustanovi se medslužbena skupina, ki jo vodi generalni direktor, pristojen za ta sklep, oziroma njegov predstavnik.
It shall be composed of representatives of the Directorates-General and Services.
Sestavljajo jo predstavniki generalnih direktoratov in služb.
It shall discuss issues of common concern and draw up a report on the implementation of the Decision every 12 months.
Razpravlja o vprašanjih skupnega interesa in vsakih 12 mesecev pripravi poročilo o izvajanju tega sklepa.
A steering committee chaired by the Publications Office and comprising the Secretariat-General, the Directorate-General for Communication, the Directorate-General for Information Society and Media, the Directorate-General for Informatics and several Directorates-General representing the data providers will oversee the project leading to the implementation of the data portal.
Projekt za uvedbo podatkovnega portala bo nadzoroval usmerjevalni odbor, ki mu predseduje Urad za publikacije ter ga sestavljajo Generalni sekretariat, Generalni direktorat za komuniciranje, Generalni direktorat za informacijsko družbo in medije, Generalni direktorat za informatiko in več drugih generalnih direktoratov, ki zastopajo ponudnike podatkov.
Other institutions may be invited to join the committee at a later stage.
V poznejši fazi se lahko v odbor povabijo še druge institucije.
The terms of the open licence referred to in Article 6 shall be settled in agreement by the Directors-General responsible for this Decision and for the administrative execution of decisions related to intellectual property rights at the Commission, after consultation of the inter-service group referred to in paragraph 1.
Pogoji za odprto dovoljenje iz člena 6 se določijo v dogovoru z generalnimi direktorji, pristojnimi za ta sklep in upravno izvajanje sklepov o pravicah intelektualne lastnine pri Komisiji, po posvetovanju z medresorsko skupino iz odstavka 1.
This Decision shall be reviewed 3 years after its entry into force.
Ta sklep se ponovno pregleda tri leta po začetku veljavnosti.
Decision 2006/291/EC, Euratom is repealed.
Sklep 2006/291/ES, Euratom se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 12 December 2011.
V Bruslju, 12. decembra 2011
OJ L 107, 20.4.2006, p. 38.
UL L 107, 20.4.2006, str. 38.
COM(2010) 245.
COM(2010) 245
‘licence’ means the granting of permission to reuse documents under specified conditions. ‘Open licence’ means a licence where reuse of documents is permitted for all specified uses in a unilateral declaration by the rightholder;
„dovoljenje“ pomeni izdajo dovoljenja za ponovno uporabo dokumentov pod določenimi pogoji; „odprto dovoljenje“ pomeni dovoljenje, s katerim imetnik pravic z enostransko izjavo dovoli ponovno uporabo dokumentov za vse opredeljene uporabe;
terminating the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia
o ustavitvi protisubvencijskega postopka za uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 14 Uredbe,
On 3 January 2011, the European Commission (Commission) received a complaint concerning the alleged subsidisation of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia (the countries concerned), thereby causing injury to the Union Industry.
(1) Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 3. januarja 2011 prejela pritožbo o domnevnem subvencioniranju nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata („PET“) s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije („zadevni državi“), kar povzroča škodo industriji Unije.
The complaint was lodged by the Committee of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Manufacturers in Europe (CPME) (the complainant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Union production of certain PET pursuant to Article 10 of the basic Regulation.
Pritožbo je vložil odbor proizvajalcev polietilen tereftalata („PET“) v Evropi (CPME) („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje Unije nekaterih vrst PET v skladu s členom 10 osnovne uredbe.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of the existence of subsidisation and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o subvencioniranju in posledični znatni škodi, kar je upravičilo začetek protisubvencijskega postopka.
Prior to the initiation of the proceeding and in accordance with Article 10(7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the governments of Oman and Saudi Arabia that it had received a properly documented complaint alleging that subsidised imports of certain PET originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia were causing material injury to the Union Industry.
Komisija je pred začetkom postopka in v skladu s členom 10(7) osnovne uredbe obvestila vladi Omana in Saudove Arabije, da je prejela pravilno dokumentirano pritožbo, da je subvencioniran uvoz nekaterih vrst PET s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
The governments of Oman and Saudi Arabia were separately invited for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as regards the content of the complaint and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Vladi Omana in Saudove Arabije sta bili ločeno povabljeni na posvetovanje, da se razjasni položaj glede vsebine pritožbe in doseže sporazumna rešitev.
The Commission, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] on 16 February 2011, initiated an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the European Union of certain PET originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija z obvestilom, objavljenim dne 16. februarja 2011 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], začela protisubvencijski postopek za uvoz v Unijo nekaterih vrst PET s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije.
On the same day, the Commission initiated an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain PET originating in the countries concerned [3].
Komisija je istega dne začela protidampinški postopek za uvoz v Unijo nekaterih vrst PET s poreklom iz zadevnih držav [3].
The Commission sent questionnaires to the Union industry, to the exporters/producers in the countries concerned, to the importers, to any association known to be concerned, and to the authorities of the countries concerned.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike industriji Unije, izvoznikom/proizvajalcem v zadevnih državah, uvoznikom, vsem združenjem, ki jih to zadeva, in organom zadevnih držav.
By a letter of 12 October 2011 to the Commission, the CPME formally withdrew its complaint.
S pismom Komisiji z dne 12. oktobra 2011 je CPME uradno umaknil svojo pritožbo.
In accordance with Article 14(1) of the basic Regulation, the proceeding may be terminated where the complaint is withdrawn, unless such termination would not be in the Union interest.
V skladu s členom 14(1) osnovne uredbe se postopek lahko ustavi, če se pritožba umakne, razen če taka ustavitev ne bi bila v interesu Unije.
In this respect it is noted that Commission did not identify any reason to indicate that termination would not be in the Union interest, nor was any such reason raised by interested parties.
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da Komisija ni našla nobenega razloga, ki bi kazal na to, da ustavitev postopka ni v interesu Unije, niti niso takih razlogov navedle zainteresirane strani.
Therefore, the Commission considered that the present proceeding should be terminated.
Komisija je zato menila, da je ta postopek treba ustaviti.
Some interested parties expressed support for the termination of the proceeding.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so podprle ustavitev postopka.
Other interested parties, although supporting the termination of the proceeding, requested a disclosure of the findings of the investigation.
Druge zainteresirane strani, čeprav so podprle ustavitev postopka, so zahtevale razkritje ugotovitev preiskave.
It is noted in this regard that the Commission did not reach a conclusion on its findings and is therefore not in a position to disclose data gathered prior to the withdrawal of the complaint.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da Komisija ni dosegla sklepa o ugotovitvah in zato ne more razkriti podatkov, zbranih pred umikom pritožbe.
In view of the above, it is concluded that there are no compelling reasons against terminating this proceeding.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se sklene, da ni prepričljivih razlogov proti ustavitvi postopka.
The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia should be terminated,
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je treba protisubvencijski postopek za uvoz v Unijo nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije ustaviti –
The anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia, currently falling within CN code 39076020, is hereby terminated.
Protisubvencijski postopek glede uvoza polietilen tereftalata z viskoznim številom 78 ml/g ali več, v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije, trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN 39076020, je s tem ustavljen.
Done at Brussels, 13 December 2011.
V Bruslju, 13. decembra 2011
OJ C 49, 16.2.2011, p. 21.
UL C 49, 16.2.2011, str. 21.
OJ C 49, 16.2.2011, p. 16.
UL C 49, 16.2.2011, str. 16.
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia
o ustavitvi protidampinškega postopka za uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije
On 3 January 2011, the European Commission (Commission) received a complaint concerning the alleged dumping of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia (the countries concerned), thereby causing injury to the Union Industry.
(1) Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 3. januarja 2011 prejela pritožbo glede domnevnega dampinga nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata („PET“) s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije („zadevni državi“), kar povzroča škodo industriji Unije.
The complaint was lodged by the Committee of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Manufacturers in Europe (CPME) (the complainant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Union production of certain PET pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation.
Pritožbo je vložil odbor proizvajalcev polietilen tereftalata („PET“) v Evropi (CPME) („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje Unije nekaterih vrst PET v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe.
The Commission, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] on 16 February 2011, initiated an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the European Union of certain PET originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija z obvestilom, objavljenim dne 16. februarja 2011 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], začela protidampinški postopek za uvoz v Unijo vrst PET s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije.
On the same day, the Commission initiated an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain PET originating in the countries concerned [3].
Komisija je istega dne začela protisubvencijski postopek za uvoz v Unijo nekaterih vrst PET s poreklom iz zadevnih držav [3].
In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, the proceeding may be terminated where the complaint is withdrawn, unless such termination would not be in the Union interest.
V skladu s členom 9(1) osnovne uredbe se postopek lahko ustavi, če se pritožba umakne, razen če taka ustavitev ne bi bila v interesu Unije.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission did not identify any reason to indicate that termination would not be in the Union interest, nor was any such reason raised by interested parties.
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da Komisija ni našla nobenega razloga, ki bi kazal na to, da ustavitev postopka ni v interesu Unije, niti niso takih razlogov navedle zainteresirane strani.
The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia should be terminated,
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je treba protidampinški postopek za uvoz v Unijo nekaterih vrst PET s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije ustaviti –
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, originating in Oman and Saudi Arabia, currently falling within CN code 39076020, is hereby terminated.
Protidampinški postopek za uvoz polietilen tereftalata z viskoznim številom 78 ml/g ali več, v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, s poreklom iz Omana in Saudove Arabije, trenutno uvrščenega pod oznako KN 39076020, se s tem ustavi.
Political and Security Committee Decision BiH/18/2011
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora BiH/18/2011