natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Directive should apply regardless of how those offences are qualified under national law.
To direktivo bi bilo treba uporabljati ne glede na opredelitev teh prekrškov po nacionalni zakonodaji.
In the framework of the Prüm Decisions, Member States grant each other the right of access to their VRD in order to improve the exchange of information and to speed up the procedures in force.
Države članice so si v okviru prümskih sklepov podelile pravico dostopa do svojih podatkov iz registrov vozil, da bi izboljšale izmenjavo informacij in pospešile veljavne postopke.
The provisions concerning the technical specifications and the availability of automated data exchange set out in the Prüm Decisions should, as far as possible, be included in this Directive.
V to direktivo bi bilo treba čim bolj vključiti določbe o tehničnih specifikacijah in razpoložljivosti avtomatizirane izmenjave podatkov, določene v prümskih sklepih.
Existing software applications should be the basis for the data exchange under this Directive and should, at the same time, also facilitate the reporting by Member States to the Commission.
Obstoječe programske aplikacije bi morale biti podlaga za izmenjavo podatkov v skladu s to direktivo in hkrati tudi olajšati poročanje držav članic Komisiji.
Such applications should provide for the expeditious, secure and confidential exchange of specific VRD between Member States.
Take aplikacije bi morale zagotoviti hitro, varno in zaupno izmenjavo specifičnih podatkov iz registrov vozil med državami članicami.
Advantage should be taken of the European Vehicle and Driving Licence Information System (Eucaris) software application, which is mandatory for Member States under the Prüm Decisions as regards VRD.
Izkoristiti bi bilo treba programsko aplikacijo Evropskega informacijskega sistema za prometna in vozniška dovoljenja (Eucaris), ki jo države članice v skladu s prümskima sklepoma morajo uporabiti za podatke iz registrov vozil.
The Commission should report on an assessment of the functioning of the software applications used for the purposes of this Directive.
Komisija bi morala poročati o oceni delovanja programskih aplikacij, ki se uporabljajo za namen te direktive.
The scope of the above-mentioned software applications should be limited to the processes used in the exchange of information between the national contact points in the Member States.
Področje uporabe zgoraj omenjene programske aplikacije bi moralo biti omejeno na postopke izmenjave informacij med nacionalnimi kontaktnimi točkami v državah članicah.
Procedures and automated processes in which the information is to be used are outside the scope of such applications.
Postopki in avtomatizirani procesi, v katerih se bodo informacije uporabljale, ne spadajo v področje uporabe tovrstnih aplikacij.
The Information Management Strategy for EU internal security aims at finding the simplest and most easily traceable and cost-effective solutions for data exchange.
Namen strategije upravljanja informacij za notranjo varnost EU je poiskati najenostavnejše, najlažje sledljive in stroškovno najučinkovitejše rešitve za izmenjavo podatkov.
Member States should be able to contact the owner, the holder of the vehicle or the otherwise identified person suspected of committing the road safety related traffic offence in order to keep the person concerned informed of the applicable procedures and the legal consequences under the law of the Member State of the offence.
Lastnik ali imetnik vozila ali drugače identificirana oseba, osumljena storitve prometnega prekrška, povezanega z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, bi morali biti dosegljivi za države članice, da bi te obveščale o zadevnih postopkih in pravnih posledicah v skladu z zakonodajo države članice prekrška.
In doing so, Member States should consider sending the information concerning road safety related traffic offences in the language of the registration documents or the language most likely to be understood by the person concerned, to ensure that that person has a clear understanding of the information which is being shared with the person concerned.
Pri tem bi morale države članice razmisliti o tem, da bi informacije o prometnih prekrških, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, poslale v jeziku dokumentov o registraciji ali v jeziku, ki ga zadevna oseba najverjetneje razume, da se zagotovi, da ta oseba razume sporočene informacije.
Member States should apply the appropriate procedures to ensure that only the person concerned is informed and not a third party.
Države članice bi morale uporabiti ustrezne postopke za zagotovitev, da se obvesti le zadevna oseba in ne nekdo tretji.
To that effect, Member States should use detailed arrangements similar to those adopted for following up such offences including means such as, where appropriate, registered delivery.
V ta namen bi morale države članice uporabiti podrobne postopke, podobne že sprejetim, ki jih uporabljajo za sledenje takim prekrškom, vključno z načinom povratnice o prispeli pošiljki.
This will allow that person to respond to the information in an appropriate way, in particular by asking for more information, settling the fine or by exercising his/her rights of defence, in particular in the case of mistaken identity.
S tem se bo tej osebi omogočilo, da se ustrezno odzove na informacije, zlasti s prošnjo po podrobnejših informacijah, s poravnavo kazni ali z uveljavljanjem svojih pravic do obrambe, zlasti v primeru napačne identifikacije.
Further proceedings are covered by applicable legal instruments, including instruments on mutual assistance and on mutual recognition, for example Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties [4].
Nadaljnji postopki so zajeti v veljavnih pravnih instrumentih, vključno z instrumenti o medsebojni pomoči in medsebojnem priznavanju, na primer z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2005/214/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni [4].
Member States should consider providing equivalent translation with respect to the information letter sent by the Member State of the offence, as provided for in Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings [5].
Države članice bi morale razmisliti o tem, da bi zagotovile ustrezen prevod pisnega obvestila, ki ga pošlje država članica prekrška, kot je predvideno v Direktivi 2010/64/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o pravici do tolmačenja in prevajanja v kazenskih postopkih [5].
With a view to pursuing a road safety policy aiming for a high level of protection for all road users in the Union and taking into account the widely differing circumstances pertaining within the Union, Member States should act, without prejudice to more restrictive policies and laws, in order to ensure greater convergence of road traffic rules and of their enforcement between Member States.
Za izvajanje politike varnosti v cestnem prometu, katere namen je visoka raven zaščite vseh uporabnikov cest v Uniji, in ob upoštevanju velike raznolikosti razmer v Uniji, bi morale države članice brez poseganja v strožje politike in zakonodaje sprejeti ukrepe za zagotovitev večje skladnosti cestnoprometnih predpisov in njihovega izvrševanja med državami članicami.
In the framework of its report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive, the Commission should examine the need to develop common standards in order to establish comparable methods, practices and minimum standards at Union level taking into account international cooperation and existing agreements in the field of road safety, in particular the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic of 8 November 1968.
V okviru svojega poročila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te direktive bi morala Komisija preučiti potrebo po razvoju skupnih standardov za vzpostavitev primerljivih metod, prakse in minimalnih standardov na ravni Unije, ob upoštevanju mednarodnega sodelovanja in obstoječih sporazumov na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu, zlasti Dunajske konvencije o cestnem prometu z dne 8. novembra 1968.
In the framework of its report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive by the Member States, the Commission should examine the need for common criteria for follow-up procedures by the Member States in the event of non-payment of a financial penalty, in accordance with Member States' laws and procedures.
V okviru svojega sporočila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te direktive v državah članicah bi morala Komisija preučiti, ali so potrebna skupna merila za postopke nadaljnjega spremljanja, ki jih izvajajo države članice v primeru neplačane denarne kazni, skladno z zakonodajo in postopki držav članic.
In this report, the Commission should address issues such as the procedures between the competent authorities of the Member States for the transmission of the final decision to impose a sanction and/or financial penalty as well as the recognition and enforcement of the final decision.
V tem poročilu bi morala Komisija obravnavati vprašanja, kot so postopki med pristojnimi organi držav članic za posredovanje dokončne odločbe o uvedbi sankcij in/ali denarne kazni, kot tudi priznavanje in izvrševanje dokončne odločbe.
In preparing the review of this Directive, the Commission should consult the relevant stakeholders, such as road safety and law enforcement authorities or bodies, victims' associations and other non-governmental organisations active in the field of road safety.
Pri pripravi pregleda te direktive bi se morala Komisija posvetovati z ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, kot so organi za varnost v cestnem prometu in organi kazenskega pregona, združenja žrtev in druge nevladne organizacije, ki delujejo na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu.
Closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities should go hand in hand with respect for fundamental rights, in particular the right to respect for privacy and to protection of personal data, guaranteed by special data protection arrangements which should take particular account of the specific nature of cross-border online access to databases.
Tesnejše sodelovanje organov kazenskega pregona bi moralo biti povezano s spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic, zlasti pravice do spoštovanja zasebnosti in varstva osebnih podatkov, kar bi bilo treba zagotoviti s posebno ureditvijo varstva podatkov, ki mora zlasti upoštevati posebno naravo čezmejnega spletnega dostopa do zbirk podatkov.
It is necessary that the software applications to be set up enable the exchange of information to be carried out in secure conditions and ensure the confidentiality of the data transmitted.
Treba je vzpostaviti programske aplikacije, da se omogoči varne pogoje za izmenjavo informacij ter zagotovi zaupnost posredovanih podatkov.
The data gathered under this Directive should not be used for purposes other than those of this Directive.
Podatke, zbrane na podlagi te direktive, je mogoče uporabljati samo za namene, ki so opredeljeni v tej direktivi.
Member States should comply with the obligations on the conditions of use and of temporary storage of the data.
Države članice bi morale izpolnjevati obveznosti glede pogojev uporabe in začasne hrambe podatkov.
Since the data relating to the identification of an offender are personal data, Member States should take the measures necessary to ensure that the relevant provisions of Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters [6] are applied.
Ker so podatki o identifikaciji storilca prekrška osebni podatki, bi morale države članice sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev skladnosti z ustreznimi določbami Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah [6].
Without prejudice to the observance of the procedural requirements for appeal and the redress mechanisms of the Member State concerned, the data subject should be informed accordingly, when notified of the offence, of the right to access, the right to rectification and deletion of personal data as well as of the maximum legal storage period of the data and should have the right to obtain the correction of any inaccurate personal data or the immediate deletion of any data recorded unlawfully.
Brez poseganja v spoštovanje postopkovnih zahtev za pritožbo in druge pravne ukrepe, ki veljajo v zadevni državi članici, bi bilo treba vse osebe, na katere se nanašajo podatki, v obvestilu o prekršku tudi ustrezno obvestiti o pravici do dostopa do osebnih podatkov, pravici do popravka in izbrisa osebnih podatkov, pa tudi o najdaljšem zakonitem obdobju hrambe podatkov, morali pa bi imeti tudi pravici do popravka netočnih osebnih podatkov ali takojšnjega črtanja nezakonito zabeleženih podatkov.
It should be possible for third countries to participate in the exchange of VRD provided that they have concluded an agreement with the Union to this effect.
Sodelovanje pri izmenjavi podatkov iz registrov vozil bi bilo treba omogočiti tudi tretjim državam, če so z Unijo v ta namen sklenile sporazum.
Such an agreement would have to include necessary provisions on data protection.
V takšen sporazum bi morale biti vključene ustrezne določbe o varstvu podatkov.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as referred to in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznava zlasti Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, kot je navedeno v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 21) on the Position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, those Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and are not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola, ti dve državi članici ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanju ni zavezujoča in se v njiju ne uporablja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
In order to achieve the objective of exchange of information between Member States through interoperable means, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of taking into account relevant changes to Decision 2008/615/JHA and Decision 2008/616/JHA or where required by legal acts of the Union directly relevant for the update of Annex I. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
Da bi dosegli cilj izmenjave informacij med državami članicami z interoperabilnimi sredstvi, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastila, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme akte v zvezi z upoštevanjem ustreznih sprememb Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ in Sklepa 2008/616/PNZ, ali če to zahteva kateri od pravnih aktov Unije, ki je neposredno pomemben za posodobitev Priloge I. Zlasti je pomembno, da Komisija pri svojem pripravljalnem delu opravi ustrezna posvetovanja, vključno na ravni strokovnjakov.
The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
Komisija bi morala pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov zagotoviti, da so ustrezni dokumenti predloženi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu istočasno, pravočasno in na ustrezen način.
In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making [7], Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interest of the Union, their own tables, which will, as far as possible, illustrate the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public.
V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje [7] se države članice poziva, da za lastne potrebe in v interesu Unije pripravijo tabele, ki naj kar najbolj nazorno prikazujejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos, ter da te tabele objavijo.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to ensure a high level of protection for all road users in the Union by facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences, where they are committed with a vehicle registered in a Member State other than the Member State where the offence took place, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore by reason of the scale and effects of the action be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer zagotavljanja visoke ravni varnosti za vse udeležence v cestnem prometu v Uniji z lažjo čezmejno izmenjavo informacij o prometnih prekrških, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, storjenih v eni državi članici z vozilom, registriranim v drugi državi članici, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinka ukrepa lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego navedenega cilja.
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted and adopted an opinion [8],
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, ki je sprejel mnenje [8] –
This Directive aims to ensure a high level of protection for all road users in the Union by facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences and thereby the enforcement of sanctions, where those offences are committed with a vehicle registered in a Member State other than the Member State where the offence took place.
Namen te direktive je zagotoviti visoko raven varnosti za vse udeležence v cestnem prometu v Uniji z olajšanjem čezmejne izmenjave informacij o prometnih prekrških, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, in s tem izvrševanje sankcij, kadar so ti prekrški storjeni z vozilom, registriranim v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je bil prekršek storjen.
This Directive shall apply to the following road safety related traffic offences:
Ta direktiva se uporablja za naslednje prometne prekrške, povezane z varnostjo v cestnem prometu:
speeding;
prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti;
non-use of a seat-belt;
neuporaba varnostnega pasu;
failing to stop at a red traffic light;
vožnja skozi rdečo luč;
drink-driving;
vožnja pod vplivom alkohola;
driving under the influence of drugs;
vožnja pod vplivom mamil;
failing to wear a safety helmet;
vožnja brez zaščitne čelade;
use of a forbidden lane;
uporaba prepovedanega voznega pasu;
illegally using a mobile telephone or any other communication devices while driving.
nezakonita uporaba prenosnega telefona ali druge komunikacijske naprave med vožnjo.
'vehicle' means any power-driven vehicle including motorcycles, which is normally used for carrying persons or goods by road;
„vozilo“ pomeni vsako vozilo na motorni pogon, vključno z motornimi kolesi, ki se običajno uporablja za prevažanje oseb ali blaga po cesti;
'Member State of the offence' means the Member State where the offence has been committed;
„država članica prekrška“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri je bil storjen prekršek;
'Member State of registration' means the Member State where the vehicle with which the offence has been committed is registered;
„država članica registracije“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri je registrirano vozilo, s katerim je bil storjen prekršek;
'speeding' means exceeding the speed limits in force in the Member State of the offence for the road and the type of vehicle concerned;
„prekoračitev dovoljene hitrosti“ pomeni prekoračitev omejitve hitrosti, ki velja v državi članici prekrška za zadevno cesto in vrsto vozila;
'non-use of a seat-belt' means failing to comply with the requirement to wear a seat-belt or use a child restraint in accordance with Council Directive 91/671/EEC of 16 December 1991 relating to the compulsory use of safety belts and child-restraint systems in vehicles [9] and the law of the Member State of the offence;
„neuporaba varnostnega pasu“ pomeni neupoštevanje zahteve o uporabi varnostnega pasu ali zadrževalnega sistema za otroke v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 91/671/EGS z dne 16. decembra 1991 o obvezni uporabi varnostnih pasov in sistemov za zadrževanje otrok v vozilih [9] in zakonodajo države članice prekrška;
'failing to stop at a red traffic light' means driving through a red traffic light or any other relevant stop signal, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence;
„vožnja skozi rdečo luč“ pomeni vožnjo skozi rdečo luč na semaforju ali mimo katerega koli drugega ustreznega znaka za zaustavitev, kakor je opredeljena z zakonodajo države članice prekrška;
'drink-driving' means driving while impaired by alcohol, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence;
„vožnja pod vplivom alkohola“ pomeni nezanesljivo vožnjo zaradi vpliva alkohola, kakor je opredeljena v zakonodaji države članice prekrška;
'driving under the influence of drugs' means driving while impaired by drugs or other substances having a similar effect, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence;
„vožnja pod vplivom mamil“ pomeni nezanesljivo vožnjo zaradi vpliva mamil ali drugih snovi s podobnim učinkom, kakor je opredeljena v zakonu države članice prekrška;
'failing to wear a safety helmet' means not wearing a safety helmet, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence;
„vožnja brez zaščitne čelade“ pomeni vožnjo brez zaščitne čelade, kakor je opredeljena v zakonodaji države članice prekrška;
'use of a forbidden lane' means illegally using part of a road section, such as an emergency lane, public transport lane or temporary closed lane for reasons of congestion or road works, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence;
„uporaba prepovedanega voznega pasu“ pomeni nezakonito uporabo dela cestnega odseka, kot so odstavni pas, pas za javni prevoz ali začasno zaprt pas zaradi zastojev ali cestnih del, kakor je opredeljena v zakonodaji države članice prekrška;
'illegally using a mobile telephone or any other communication devices while driving' means illegally using a mobile telephone or any other communication devices while driving, as defined in the law of the Member State of the offence;
„nezakonita uporaba prenosnega telefona ali druge komunikacijske naprave med vožnjo“ pomeni nezakonito uporabo prenosnega telefona ali druge komunikacijske naprave med vožnjo, kakor je opredeljena v zakonodaji države članice prekrška;