natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the entries for the local units ‘DE45209 WEILHEIM I. OB’ and ‘DE45509 WEISSENBURG’ are replaced by the following:
vnosa za območna urada „DE45209 WEILHEIM I. OB“ in „DE45509 WEISSENBURG“ se nadomestita z naslednjim:
WEISSENBURG-GUNZENHAUSEN’
WEISSENBURG-GUNZENHAUSEN“;
the following local unit entry is added to the entries for the regional unit DE00009 BAYERN:
za regionalni urad „DE00009 BAYERN“ se doda naslednji vnos območnega urada:
KRONACH’
KRONACH“;
the entry for the local unit ‘DE09515 DESSAU-ROSSLAU, STADT’ is replaced by the following:
vnos za območni urad „DE09515 DESSAU-ROSSLAU, STADT“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
DESSAU-ROßLAU, STADT’
DESSAU-ROßLAU, STADT“;
the entry for the local unit ‘DE39115 SALZLAND’ is replaced by the following:
vnos za območni urad „DE39115 SALZLAND“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
SALZLANDKREIS’
SALZLANDKREIS“;
in the part concerning Ireland, the entry for the local unit ‘IE12100 TIPPERARY SOUTH’ is replaced by the following:
v delu, ki zadeva Irsko, se vnos za območni urad „IE12100 TIPPERARY SOUTH“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
TIPPERARY’
TIPPERARY“;
the entries for the regional unit ‘IT00018 CALABRIA’ and for the local units in that regional unit are replaced by the following:
vnosi za regionalni urad „IT00018 CALABRIA“ in za območne urade v navedenem regionalnem uradu se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
VIBO VALENTIA’
VIBO VALENTIA“;
the following entries for the regional unit ‘IT00003 LOMBARDIA’ are deleted:
naslednji vnosi za regionalni urad „IT00003 LOMBARDIA“ se črtajo:
VIADANA’;
VIADANA“;
in the part concerning Portugal, the entry for the local unit ‘PT05300 LOURES’ is replaced by the following:
v delu, ki zadeva Portugalsko, se vnos za območni urad „PT05300 LOURES“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
LISBOA’
LISBOA“.
authorising a method for grading pig carcasses in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Velikem vojvodstvu Luksemburg
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) [1], and in particular Article 43, point (m), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (Uredba o enotni SUT) [1] ter zlasti člena 43(m) v povezavi s členom 4 Uredbe,
Point B.IV, paragraph 1, of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 provides that, for the classification of pig carcasses, the lean-meat content has to be assessed by means grading methods authorised by the Commission, which methods may only be statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcass.
Odstavek 1 točke B.IV Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007 določa, da se za razvrščanje trupov prašičev vsebnost pustega mesa oceni z metodami za ocenjevanje, ki jih odobri Komisija, odobrijo pa se lahko le statistično potrjene metode, ki temeljijo na fizičnih meritvah enega ali več anatomskih delov trupa prašiča.
This tolerance is defined in Article 23(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008 of 10 December 2008 laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and the reporting of prices thereof [2].
To odstopanje je opredeljeno v členu 23(3) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1249/2008 z dne 10. decembra 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo lestvic Skupnosti za razvrščanje trupov goved, prašičev in ovac ter sporočanje njihovih cen [2].
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is of the opinion that the update of the national formula is absolutely necessary in order to take into account the breeding progress during the past 20 years.
Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg meni, da je nujno posodobiti nacionalno enačbo, da bo upoštevan napredek pri vzreji v zadnjih 20 letih.
The last update of the lean meat equation of the grading instrument (HGP-2) dates back to 1989 and was authorised by Commission Decision 89/51/EEC [3].
Enačba za izračun deleža pustega mesa za napravo za razvrščanje (HGP-2) je bila nazadnje posodobljena leta 1989, odobrena pa je bila z Odločbo Komisije 89/51/EGS [3].
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has therefore asked the Commission to authorise one method for grading pig carcasses on its territory and has presented a detailed description of the dissection trial, indicating the principles on which this method is based, the results of its dissection trial and the equation used for assessing the percentage of lean meat in the protocol provided for in Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1249/2008.
Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg je zato Komisijo prosilo, da odobri metodo za razvrščanje trupov prašičev na njegovem ozemlju, ter v protokolu v skladu s členom 23(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1249/2008 predložilo podroben opis preskusa z razkosanjem in navedlo načela, na katerih temelji metoda, rezultate preskusa z razkosanjem in enačbo za ocenjevanje deleža pustega mesa.
This grading method should therefore be authorised in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
Zato je treba Velikemu vojvodstvu Luksemburg odobriti metodo za razvrščanje.
No modification of the apparatus or grading method may be authorised except by means of a new Commission Decision adopted in the light of experience gained.
Spremembe naprav ali metod razvrščanja se lahko odobrijo samo z novim sklepom Komisije, ki se sprejme zaradi pridobljenih izkušenj.
Decision 89/51/EEC should therefore be repealed.
Odločbo 89/51/EGS je zato treba razveljaviti.
However, in view of technical circumstances while introducing new devices and new equation the method for grading pig carcasses authorised under Decision 89/51/EEC should continue to apply up to 28 February 2011.
Vendar se zaradi tehničnih okoliščin, povezanih z uvajanjem novih naprav in nove enačbe, metoda za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov, odobrena z Odločbo 89/51/EGS, uporablja do 28. februarja 2011.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov –
The use of the following method is hereby authorised for grading pig carcasses pursuant to point B.IV, paragraph 1, of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg: the apparatus termed ‘Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)’ and the assessment method related thereto, details of which are given in the Annex.
Za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Velikem vojvodstvu Luksemburg se v skladu z odstavkom 1 točke B.IV Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1234/2007 odobri naslednja metoda: naprava, imenovana „Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)“, in z njo povezana metoda ocenjevanja, ki sta podrobno opredeljeni v Prilogi.
Decision 89/51/EEC is repealed.
Odločba 89/51/EGS se razveljavi.
However, up to 28 February 2011, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg may continue to apply the method for grading pig carcasses authorised under Decision 89/51/EEC.
Vendar lahko Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg do 28. februarja 2011 uporablja metodo za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov, odobreno z Odločbo 89/51/EGS.
OJ L 20, 25.1.1989, p. 31.
UL L 20, 25.1.1989, str. 31.
Method for grading pig carcasses in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Metoda za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Velikem vojvodstvu Luksemburg
The results of the measurements shall be converted into estimated lean meat content by means of the HGP 4 itself or a computer linked to it.
Rezultati meritev se preračunajo v ocenjeni delež pustega mesa s samim HGP 4 ali z njim povezanim računalnikom.
The lean meat content of the carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Delež pustega mesa trupa se izračuna z naslednjo enačbo:
LMP the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcass,
LMP ocenjeni odstotek pustega mesa trupa,
F the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 7 centimetres off the midline of the split carcass, between the second and third last ribs,
F debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 7 centimetrov od vzdolžne osi razpolovljenega trupa med drugim in tretjim zadnjim rebrom,
M the thickness of the dorsal muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as F.
M debelina hrbtne mišice v milimetrih, merjena istočasno in na istem mestu kot F.
relating to the clearance of the accounts presented by Romania for the expenditure financed under the special accession programme for agriculture and rural development (Sapard) in 2007
v zvezi s potrditvijo obračunov, ki jih je Romunija predložila za izdatke, financirane iz posebnega pristopnega programa za kmetijstvo in razvoj (Sapard) v letu 2007
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 of 21 June 1999 on Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of central and eastern Europe in the pre-accession period [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1268/1999 z dne 21. junija 1999 o podpori Skupnosti za predpristopne ukrepe za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja v državah prosilkah Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope v predpristopnem obdobju [1],
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2222/2000 of 7 June 2000 laying down financial rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 on Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of central and eastern Europe in the pre-accession period [2], and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2222/2000 z dne 7. junija 2000 o finančnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1268/1999 o podpori Skupnosti za predpristopne ukrepe za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja v državah prosilkah Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope v predpristopnem obdobju [2] ter zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
Having regard to the Multiannual Financing Agreement concluded with Romania on 2 February 2001 and in particular Article 11 of Section A to the Annex thereof,
ob upoštevanju Večletnega sporazuma o financiranju, sklenjenega z Romunijo dne 2. februarja 2001, ter zlasti člena 11 oddelka A Priloge k Sporazumu,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 248/2007 of 8 March 2007 on measures concerning the Multi-annual Financing Agreements and the Annual Financing Agreements concluded under the Sapard programme and the transition from Sapard to rural development [3], in conjunction with the Multiannual Financing Agreements as referred to in Annex II, point 1 to that Regulation, and in particular Article 11 of Section A to the Annex thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 248/2007 z dne 8. marca 2007 o ukrepih v zvezi z Večletnimi sporazumi o financiranju in Letnimi sporazumi o financiranju, sprejetimi v okviru programa Sapard, ter o prehodu od programa Sapard k razvoju podeželja [3], v povezavi z Večletnim sporazumom o financiranju, kot je naveden v točki 1 Priloge II k navedeni uredbi, ter zlasti člena 11 oddelka A Priloge k Sporazumu,
The Commission, acting on behalf of the European Union, concluded multiannual financing agreements (MAFAs) laying down the technical, legal and administrative framework for the execution of the Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development (Sapard) with Romania.
Komisija je v imenu Evropske unije z Romunijo sklenila večletne sporazume o financiranju (MAFA), s katerimi je določila tehnični, pravni in upravni okvir za izvedbo posebnega pristopnega programa za kmetijstvo in razvoj (Sapard).
Article 11 of Section A of the Annex to the MAFAs provides for the adoption of a clearance of accounts Decision by the Commission.
V skladu s členom 11 oddelka A Priloge k MAFA Komisija sprejme sklep o potrditvi obračunov.
That provision continues to apply to Romania, by virtue of Regulation (EC) No 248/2007.
Ta določba se na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 248/2007 še vedno uporablja za Romunijo.
The time limits granted to the recipient countries for the submission to the Commission of the requisite documents have expired.
Časovne omejitve, ki so bile predpisane državam prejemnicam za predložitev zahtevane dokumentacije Komisije, so se iztekle.
The supplementary information has in the meantime been submitted.
V vmesnem času so bile predložene dodatne informacije.
The checks carried out enable the Commission to take a decision on the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the Sapard Agency.
Opravljeni pregledi Komisiji omogočijo sprejemanje odločitev v zvezi s celovitostjo, točnostjo in verodostojnostjo obračunov, ki jih predloži agencija Sapard.
This Decision is adopted on the basis of accounting information.
Ta sklep je sprejet na podlagi računovodskih informacij.
It does not prejudice the possibility for the Commission to decide subsequently to exclude from EU financing expenditure not incurred in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2222/2000,
Ne posega v možnost Komisije, da iz financiranja EU naknadno izključi izdatke, ki niso nastali v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2222/2000 –
The accounts of the Sapard Agency, situated on the territory of Romania, which concern expenditure financed by the general budget of the European Union in 2007 are hereby cleared.
Obračuni agencije Sapard na ozemlju Romunije, ki zadevajo izdatke, financirane iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za leto 2007, se potrdijo.
The expenditure and funding received from the EU for the financial year 2007, as stated on 31 December 2007, and the assets held by this Beneficiary Country on behalf of the EU on 31 December 2007, to be cleared under this Decision, are laid down in the Annex.
V Prilogi so navedeni izdatki in sredstva, pridobljena od EU v proračunskem letu 2007, kot je njihovo stanje na dan 31. decembra 2007, ter sredstva, s katerimi ta država prejemnica razpolaga v imenu EU na dan 31. decembra 2007, ki se odobrijo na podlagi tega sklepa.
OJ L 69, 9.3.2007, p. 5.
UL L 69, 9.3.2007, str. 5.
Clearance of the Romanian Sapard Agency's accounts
Potrditev obračunov romunske agencije Sapard
Expenditure and funding received from the EU in respect of the financial year 2007 as stated at 31 December 2007
Izdatki in sredstva, pridobljena od EU, v zvezi s proračunskim letom 2007, kot je njihovo stanje na dan 31. decembra 2007
(all amounts in euro)
(vsi zneski so v eurih)
Beneficiary Country
Država prejemnica
Declaration D2
Poročilo D2
EU-contribution
Prispevek EU
EU-contribution cleared with this decision
Prispevek EU, potrjen s tem sklepom
EU-contribution disjoined with this decision
Prispevek EU, izločen s tem sklepom
Total b + c
Skupaj b + c
Adjustments [1]
Prilagoditve [1]
Funding received from the EU (D1)
Sredstva prejeta od EU (D1)
Difference to berecovered or paid
Razlika, ki jo je treba izterjati ali plačati
Financial year 2007 [2]
Proračunsko leto 2007 [2]
Assets held by the Beneficiary Countries on behalf of the EU on 31 December 2007
Sredstva, s katerimi država prejemnica razpolaga v imenu EU dne 31. decembra 2007
EURO ACCOUNT
EURSKI RAČUN
balance cleared with this decision
stanje na računu, potrjeno s tem sklepom
balance disjoined with this decision
stanje, izločeno s tem sklepom
DEBTORS
DOLŽNIKI
cleared with this decision
potrjeni s tem sklepom
disjoined with this decision
izločeni s tem sklepom
This amount represents the adjustments made by the Romanian authorities in the declared expenditure to the Commission for the FY 2007 during the subsequent periods, due to recovered amounts for the measure 3.3.
Ta znesek predstavlja popravke, ki so jih romunski organi vnesli v izdatke, prijavljene Komisiji za proračunsko leto 2007, v naslednjih obdobjih, in sicer na podlagi izterjanih zneskov za ukrep 3.3.
This amount represents the mathematical difference between the amount cleared and that reimbursed for the financial year 2007, without taking into account the advances paid in the previous years.The Commission services do not commit to recover or pay any amount at the date of this decision.
Ta znesek predstavlja matematično razliko med potrjenim zneskom in zneskom, ki je bil povrnjen za proračunsko leto 2007, v njem pa niso upoštevana predplačila, poravnana v prejšnjih letih. Službe Komisije se ne zavezujejo k izterjavi ali plačilu kakršnega koli zneska na dan sprejetja tega sklepa.
The difference of (EUR –97342,50) is the mathematical result of (EUR 97452,16) representing expenditure declared but not reimbursed by the Commission following the appraisal of the reperformance reports for the measure 3.3, of (EUR – 92,69) representing corrections made by the Romanian authorities in 2007 for D1 2006, of (EUR – 18,36) triggered by the use of an incorrect exchange rate for three recoveries as explained by the CB, and of (EUR 1,39) due to rounding.
Razlika v vrednosti [–97342,50 EUR] je matematični rezultat, pridobljen z izračunom [97452,16 EUR], ki predstavljajo izdatke, ki so bili prijavljeni, vendar jih Komisija še ni povrnila po oceni poročil o ponovni izvedbi za ukrep 3.3, [– 92,69 EUR], ki predstavljajo popravke romunskih organov v letu 2007 za D1 2006, [– 18,36 EUR], ki jih je povzročila uporaba netočnega menjalnega tečaja pri treh izterjavah, kot je razložil certifikacijski organ, in [1,39 EUR] zaradi zaokrožitve zneska.
The amounts do not take into account the interests accrued on debts.
V teh zneskih niso upoštevane obresti, nastale pri dolgovih.
Commission Decision C(2008) 5524 of 30 September 2008 cleared the accounts of Bulgaria and Croatia.
Sklep Komisije C(2008) 5524 z dne 30. septembra 2008 je potrdil obračune Bolgarije in Hrvaške.
However, pending the review of supplementary information which had been requested from Romania, the decision concerning the accounts of this country could not be adopted at that stage.
Vendar zaradi ponovnega pregleda dodatnih informacij, ki jih je Komisija zahtevala od Romunije, takrat ni bilo mogoče sprejeti sklepa o potrditvi obračunov za to državo.
State aid measure C 11/04 (ex NN 4/03) — Olympic Airways — Restructuring and privatisation
Državna pomoč C 11/04 (ex NN 4/03) – Olympic Airways – Prestrukturiranje in privatizacija
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1],
In a letter dated 3 March 2003 (TREN A/26534, 25 July 2003) the Greek authorities underlined their commitment to privatise the State-owned airline Olympic Airways and described the steps they had already taken to that end.
Grški organi so v dopisu z dne 3. marca 2003 (TREN A/26534, 25. julij 2003) poudarili svojo zavezanost privatizaciji letalske družbe Olympic Airways, ki je v državni lasti, in opisali ukrepe, ki so že bili sprejeti v zvezi s tem.
On the same day the Commission wrote to the Greek authorities (TREN D/15287) insisting that they should notify the Commission of the law providing for the privatisation of Olympic Airways, which was adopted on 9 September 2003.
Istega dne je Komisija z dopisom (TREN D/15287) pozvala grške organe, naj ji priglasijo zakon, ki določa privatizacijo družbe Olympic Airways in ki je bil sprejet 9. septembra 2003.
By letter dated 17 September 2003 (TREN A/30881), the Greek authorities stated that they intended to submit this information in due course.
Grški organi so v dopisu z dne 17. septembra 2003 (TREN A/30881) navedli, da nameravajo te informacije predložiti pravočasno.
On 25 September 2003 the Commission received an official complaint about the privatisation of Olympic Airways from a competitor, Aegean Airlines (TREN A/30589).
Komisija je 25. septembra 2003 od konkurenčne družbe Aegean Airlines prejela uradno pritožbo (TREN A/30589) v zvezi s privatizacijo družbe Olympic Airways.
On 12 December 2003, before the Commission had completed its examination of the compatibility with Article 87 of the Treaty of the measures for the restructuring and privatisation of Olympic Airways, a new company came into being, under the name ‘Olympic Airlines’.
Preden je Komisija končala preučevanje združljivosti ukrepov za prestrukturiranje in privatizacijo družbe Olympic Airways s členom 87 Pogodbe, in sicer 12. decembra 2003, je bila ustanovljena nova družba z imenom Olympic Airlines.
The information injunction proceedings initiated by the Commission on 8 September 2003 were therefore now entered in the State aid register under case number NN 4/03.
Zato je bil postopek odredbe o predložitvi podatkov, ki ga je Komisija začela 8. septembra 2003, v registru državnih pomoči evidentiran pod oznako NN 4/03.
On 15 December 2003 (TREN D/22742), the Commission reiterated its request for information on the privatisation; the Greek authorities provided the information requested by letters dated 18 and 19 December 2003 (TREN A/38288 and TREN A/38258).
Komisija je 15. decembra 2003 (TREN D/22742) ponovno poslala zahtevo za informacije o privatizaciji, grški organi pa so zahtevane informacije predložili z dopisoma z dne 18. in 19. decembra 2003 (TREN A/38288 oziroma TREN A/38258).
On 15 January 2004, a new request for additional information was sent to the Greek authorities (TREN D/160), who replied in two letters both dated 16 January 2004 (TREN A/11076 and TREN A/11077)
Grškim organom je bila 15. januarja 2004 poslana nova zahteva za dodatne informacije (TREN D/160), navedeni organi pa so odgovorili z dopisoma z dne 16. januarja 2004 (TREN A/11076 oziroma TREN A/11077).
On 16 January 2004 the Commission wrote to the Greek authorities regarding Athens International Airport (‘AIA’), at Spata, and its ongoing relationship with Olympic Airways/Airlines.
Komisija je 16. januarja 2004 na grške organe naslovila dopis v zvezi z atenskim mednarodnim letališčem („AIA“) v mestu Spata in njegovim razmerjem z družbama Olympic Airways/Airlines.
By decision of 16 March 2004, notified to Greece by letter dated 16 March 2004 (SG(2002) D/228848), the Commission initiated the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty.
Komisija je z odločbo z dne 16. marca 2004, ki je bila Grčiji priglašena z dopisom z dne 16. marca 2004 (SG(2002) D/228848), začela postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe.
The case was registered under number C 11/04.
Zadeva je bila evidentirana pod oznako C 11/04.
The Commission’s decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure was also published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Odločitev Komisije o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave je bila tudi objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Commission there invited interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
Greece sent comments to the Commission by letter dated 11 June 2004.
Grčija je Komisiji predložila pripombe z dopisom z dne 11. junija 2004.
Greece’s observations were received on 3 November 2004.
Ugotovitve Grčije je Komisija prejela 3. novembra 2004.
On 11 October 2004 the Commission sent a letter giving the Greek authorities formal notice that it intended to issue a suspension injunction if within ten days of receipt of the letter it did not receive satisfactory information demonstrating that Greece was no longer making aid payments to the beneficiaries.
Komisija je 11. oktobra 2004 grškim organom poslala uradno obvestilo, da bo izdala odredbo o začasnem odlogu, če od nje v desetih dneh od prejema obvestila ne dobi zadovoljivih informacij, ki dokazujejo, da je Grčija upravičencem prenehala izplačevati pomoč.
The Greek authorities were asked to submit their comments on the matter.
Grški organi so bili pozvani, naj predložijo pripombe v zvezi s tem.
The Greek authorities replied to this letter of formal notice on 28 October 2004.
Grški organi so 28. oktobra 2004 odgovorili na to uradno obvestilo.
Greece argued that issuing an injunction at this stage would seriously jeopardise the intensive efforts Greece was making to find a solution, and would be disproportionate and unjustified.
Grčija je menila, da bi izdaja take odredbe v tej fazi resno ogrozila intenzivna prizadevanja Grčije v okviru iskanja rešitve ter da bi bil tak ukrep nesorazmeren in neupravičen.