natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The information received in this context from Sri Lanka has been taken by the Commission fully into account and has contributed to inform its assessment.
Informacije, ki jih je Šrilanka predložila v tem okviru, je Komisija v celoti upoštevala in prispevale so k oblikovanju ocene iz poročila Komisije.
On 19 October 2009, the Commission approved a report containing its findings (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Report’).
Komisija je 19. oktobra 2009 odobrila poročilo z njenimi ugotovitvami.
The Report concludes that the national legislation of Sri Lanka incorporating international human rights conventions, specifically the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, is not effectively implemented.
V poročilu je bilo ugotovljeno, da se nacionalna zakonodaja Šrilanke, ki vključuje mednarodne konvencije o človekovih pravicah, zlasti Mednarodni pakt o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, Konvencijo o preprečevanju mučenja in nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja ter Konvencijo o otrokovih pravicah, ne izvaja učinkovito.
Sri Lanka was provided with the Report containing the findings of the investigation and reminded that those findings constituted the basis on which the Commission intended to decide whether to recommend the temporary withdrawal of the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance.
Šrilanki je bilo predloženo poročilo z ugotovitvami preiskave, in opozorjena je bila, da se bo Komisija na podlagi teh ugotovitev odločila, ali bo priporočila začasen preklic posebnega spodbujevalnega režima za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje.
Sri Lanka was also granted a period within which it could make representations on this matter or specifically in relation to the Report.
Šrilanki je bilo odobreno tudi obdobje za predložitev stališč o tej zadevi ali zlasti v zvezi s poročilom Komisije.
Sri Lanka provided the Commission with a number of observations in respect of the subject-matter of the Report and conduct of the investigation.
Šrilanka je Komisiji predložila številne pripombe v zvezi s predmetom poročila in izvedbo preiskave.
These observations covered also facts and findings on which Sri Lanka was given the opportunity to comment during the investigation but did not do so.
Te pripombe so zajemale tudi dejstva in ugotovitve, o katerih je imela Šrilanka možnost predložiti pripombe med preiskavo, a tega ni storila.
The Commission nevertheless considered Sri Lanka’s observations carefully and in particular those relevant in the context of a decision on temporary withdrawal.
Komisija je kljub temu pripombe Šrilanke skrbno proučila, zlasti tiste, ki so pomembne za odločitev o začasnem preklicu.
The Commission’s assessment, of which Sri Lanka was informed, led to the conclusion that none of Sri Lanka’s arguments would substantively alter the findings of the investigation.
Ocena Komisije, o kateri je bila Šrilanka obveščena, je privedla do zaključka, da noben argument Šrilanke ne bi bistveno spremenil ugotovitev preiskave.
The Commission has submitted the Report on the findings of the investigation to the Generalised Preferences Committee on 17 November 2009, in accordance with Article 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 732/2008.
Komisija je poročilo o ugotovitvah preiskave predložila Odboru za splošne preferenciale 17. novembra 2009, v skladu s členom 19(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 732/2008.
In the light of the foregoing, the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance should be withdrawn temporarily for all products originating in Sri Lanka, until it is decided that the reasons justifying the temporary withdrawal no longer prevail.
V skladu z navedenim je treba posebni spodbujevalni režim za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje za vse izdelke s poreklom iz Šrilanke začasno preklicati, dokler se ne sklene, da ni več razlogov, ki upravičujejo začasen preklic.
This Regulation should enter into force 6 months after its adoption, unless the Council decides before then, upon a proposal from the Commission, that the reasons justifying it no longer prevail,
Ta uredba mora začeti veljati šest mesecev po njenem sprejetju, razen, če je pred tem na predlog Komisije Svet sklenil, da ni več razlogov, ki upravičujejo začasen preklic –
The special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance for products originating in Sri Lanka provided for in Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 shall be withdrawn temporarily.
Posebni spodbujevalni režim za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje za izdelke s poreklom z Šrilanke, ki ga določa Uredba (ES) št. 732/2008, se začasno prekliče.
With respect to the period of application of Regulation (EC) No 732/2008, the Council, acting by qualified majority, on a proposal from the Commission, shall re-establish the special incentive arrangement for products originating in Sri Lanka, if the reasons justifying the temporary withdrawal no longer prevail.
Svet ob upoštevanju obdobja uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 732/2008 na predlog Komisije s kvalificirano večino ponovno uvede posebni spodbujevalni režim za izdelke s poreklom z Šrilanke, če ni več razlogov, ki upravičujejo začasen preklic.
This Regulation shall enter into force 6 months after its adoption, unless the Council before then, on a proposal from the Commission pursuant to Article 19(5) of Regulation (EC) No 732/2008, decides otherwise.
Ta uredba začne veljati šest mesecev po sprejetju, če Svet pred tem na predlog Komisije v skladu s členom 19(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 732/2008 ne sklene drugače.
Commission Decision 2008/938/EC of 9 December 2008 on the list of the beneficiary countries which qualify for the special incentive arrangement for sustainable development and good governance, provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 (OJ L 334, 12.12.2008, p. 90).
Odločba Komisije z dne 9. decembra 2008 o seznamu držav upravičenk, ki so upravičene do posebnega spodbujevalnega režima za trajnostni razvoj in dobro upravljanje, kakor je predvideno v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 (UL L 334, 12.12.2008, str. 90).
Commission Decision 2008/803/EC of 14 October 2008 providing for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 18(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 with respect to the effective implementation of certain human rights conventions in Sri Lanka (OJ L 277, 18.10.2008, p. 34).
Sklep Komisije (2008/803/ES) z dne 14. oktobra 2008 o začetku preiskave v skladu s členom 18(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 glede učinkovitega izvajanja nekaterih konvencij o človekovih pravicah na Šrilanki (UL L 277, 18.10.2008, str. 34).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 144/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 144/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 February 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 20. februarja 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 145/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 145/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 February 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 23. februarja 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 146/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 146/2010
amending Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system, under the direct support schemes for farmers provided for in that Regulation, as well as for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards cross-compliance under the support scheme provided for the wine sector under the support scheme provided for the wine sector
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo, modulacijo ter integriranim administrativnim in kontrolnim sistemom v okviru shem neposrednih podpor za kmete, določenih z navedeno uredbo, ter za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo v okviru sheme podpore, določene za sektor vina
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [2] and in particular Article 142(c), (k) and (n) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 [2] ter zlasti člena 142(c), (k) in (n) Uredbe,
Following the presentation of simplification proposals to the Council in April 2009, a number of possible improvements in terms of efficiency and simplification of the rules governing the implementation of cross-compliance have been identified.
Po predstavitvi predlogov poenostavitev Svetu v aprilu 2009 je bilo ugotovljenih več možnih izboljšav glede učinkovitosti in poenostavitve pravil, ki urejajo izvajanje navzkrižne skladnosti.
It is appropriate to incorporate those improvements in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 [3].
Primerno je, da se ta izboljšanja vključijo v Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1122/2009 [3].
The identification system for agricultural parcels is a key element in the process of assuring correct payments to the farmer and safeguarding the funds of the Union.
Identifikacijski sistem za kmetijske parcele je ključni element v procesu zagotavljanja pravilnih plačil kmetu in zaščite finančnih sredstev Unije.
In order to enhance the quality of that system, provisions should be introduced requiring a yearly assessment of the system.
Da bi povečali kakovost navedenega sistema, bi bilo treba uvesti določbe, ki bi zahtevale letno ocenjevanje sistema.
The quality of the system should be assessed by the Member States in accordance with a harmonised method and reporting by Member States should be made timely enough to allow effective use of the results of the assessment.
Kakovost sistema bi morale ocenjevati države članice v skladu z usklajeno metodo, poročanje držav članic pa bi moralo biti dovolj zgodnje, da bi omogočilo učinkovito uporabo izidov ocenjevanja.
Article 64(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 provides for a derogation where a farmer concerned by the integration of coupled support does not hold any payment entitlements but declares a number of leased payment entitlements in the first year of integration of that support.
Člen 64(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 določa odstopanje, pri katerem kmet, na katerega se nanaša vključitev vezane podpore, nima pravic do plačila, ampak prijavi število zakupljenih pravic do plačila v prvem letu vključitve navedene podpore.
Such a farmer should be allocated entitlements for which a derogation as regards activation applies.
Takemu kmetu bi bilo treba dodeliti pravice, za katere se uporablja odstopanje glede aktiviranja.
In order to ensure an efficient control, the traceability of those entitlements should be assured.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega nadzora bi bilo treba zagotoviti sledljivost navedenih pravic.
In performing the cross-compliance checks provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009, a Member State can only use the results of on-the-spot checks carried out by the competent control authorities.
Pri izvajanju pregledov navzkrižne skladnosti, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 1122/2009, lahko država članica uporablja le rezultate pregledov na kraju samem, ki jih izvajajo pristojni nadzorni organi.
For efficiency reasons, a Member State should have the possibility to also use the results of on-the-spot checks carried out pursuant to the legislation applicable to the acts and standards in question in order to reach the minimum control rate.
Zaradi boljše učinkovitosti bi morala država članica imeti možnost, da uporablja tudi rezultate pregledov na kraju samem, ki se izvajajo v skladu z zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za zadevne pravne akte in standarde, da se kar najbolj zmanjša število pregledov.
However, it should be ensured that an effective control system is maintained.
Vendar je treba zagotoviti, da se ohranja učinkovit nadzorni sistem.
For the sampling of on-the-spot checks for cross-compliance, a Member State may take into account in the risk analysis the farmers' participation in relevant certification systems.
Pri določitvi vzorca pregledov navzkrižne skladnosti na kraju samem lahko država članica v analizi tveganja upošteva sodelovanje kmeta v zadevnih sistemih certificiranja.
The use of that option should be clarified.
Uporabo te možnosti je treba jasno določiti.
Control reports have to be sent to the paying agency or coordinating authority within an established deadline.
Poročila o pregledih je treba poslati plačilni agenciji ali usklajevalnemu organu znotraj določenega roka.
In order to reduce the administrative burden, where the control report does not contain any findings, it should be considered sufficient if the control reports are made directly accessible to the paying agency or coordinating authority.
Da se zmanjša upravno breme, bi se v primerih, ko poročilo o pregledu ne vsebuje nobenih izsledkov, moralo šteti kot zadostno, če so poročila o pregledu neposredno dostopna plačilni agenciji ali usklajevalnemu organu.
At the occasion of this amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 it is appropriate to correct two erroneous references to Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 [4] respectively.
Ob tej spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1122/2009 je primerno popraviti dve napačni sklicevanji, in sicer na Uredbo (ES) št. 73/2009 in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1121/2009 [4].
Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba Uredbo (ES) št. 1122/2009 ustrezno spremeniti.
The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets and the Management Committee for Direct Payments have not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by their chairman,
Upravljalni odbor za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov in Upravljalni odbor za neposredna plačila nista poslala mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil predsednik –
Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1122/2009 se spremeni:
Article 6(2) is replaced by the following:
Člen 6(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States shall annually assess the quality of the identification system for agricultural parcels.
Države članice letno ocenjujejo kakovost identifikacijskega sistema za kmetijske parcele.
That assessment shall cover the following quality elements:
Ocena se nanaša na naslednje elemente kakovosti:
the correct quantification of the maximum eligible area;
pravilna navedba velikosti največje upravičene površine;
the proportion and distribution of reference parcels where the maximum eligible area takes ineligible areas into account or where it does not take agricultural area into account;
sorazmerni delež in razporeditev referenčnih parcel, pri katerih največja upravičena površina upošteva neupravičene površine oziroma pri katerih ne upošteva kmetijske površine;
the categorisation of reference parcels where the maximum eligible area takes ineligible areas into account or where it does not take agricultural area into account;
kategorizacija referenčnih parcel, pri katerih največja upravičena površina upošteva neupravičene površine oziroma pri katerih ne upošteva kmetijske površine;
the occurrence of reference parcels with critical defects;
obstoj referenčnih parcel s kritičnimi pomanjkljivostmi;
the ratio of declared area in relation to the maximum eligible area inside the reference parcels;
razmerje med prijavljeno površino in največjo upravičeno površino znotraj referenčnih parcel;
the percentage of reference parcels which have been subject to change, accumulated over the years;
odstotni delež referenčnih parcel, na katerih so se z leti zgodile spremembe;
the rate of irregularities determined during on-the-spot checks.
pogostnost nepravilnosti, ugotovljenih med pregledi na kraju samem.
When performing the assessment referred to in the first subparagraph, Member States shall:
Pri izvajanju ocenjevanja, navedenega v prvem pododstavku države članice:
use data allowing to assess the current situation on the ground;
uporabljajo podatke, ki jim omogočajo oceniti trenutne razmere na kraju samem;
select an adequate random sample of all reference parcels.
izberejo ustrezen naključni vzorec vseh referenčnih parcel.
An assessment report and, where appropriate, the remedial actions and the timetable for their implementation shall be sent to the Commission by 31 January following the calendar year in question at the latest.
Ocenjevalno poročilo in, kadar je primerno, popravljalni ukrepi in časovni načrt za njihovo izvedbo se pošljejo Komisiji najpozneje 31. januarja po zadevnem koledarskem letu.
However, in respect of the calendar year 2010, this information shall be sent to the Commission by 28 February 2011 at the latest.’
Vendar se za koledarsko leto 2010 te informacije pošljejo Komisiji najpozneje 28. februarja 2011.“
In Article 7(1), point (f) is replaced by the following:
V členu 7(1) se točka (f) nadomesti z naslednjim:
kind of entitlement, in particular special entitlements provided for in Article 44 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, entitlements allocated in accordance with Article 68(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 and payment entitlements subject to a derogation as provided for in Article 64(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009;’
vrsta pravice, zlasti posebne pravice, določene v členu 44 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, pravice, dodeljene v skladu s členom 68(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, in pravice do plačila, ki so predmet odstopanja, določenega v členu 64(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009;“
In Article 28(1)(a), the words ‘Annexes I and IV’ are replaced by ‘Annexes I and VI’.
V členu 28(1)(a) se izraz „prilog I in IV“ nadomesti z izrazom „prilog I in VI“.
In Article 50, the following paragraph 1a is inserted:
V člen 50 se vstavi naslednji odstavek 1a:
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, in order to reach the minimum control rate referred to in that paragraph at the level of each act or standard or group of acts or standards, the Member State may:
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 lahko država članica z namenom, da na ravni vsakega akta ali standarda ali skupine aktov ali standardov doseže najmanjšo stopnjo kontrole iz navedenega odstavka:
use the results of on-the-spot checks carried out pursuant to the legislation applicable to those acts and standards for the selected farmers; or
uporablja rezultate pregledov na kraju samem, ki se izvajajo v skladu z zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za te akte in standarde za izbrane kmete, ali
replace selected farmers by farmers subject to an on-the-spot check carried out pursuant to the legislation applicable to those acts and standards provided that those farmers are submitting aid applications under support schemes for direct payments within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 or under support schemes which are subject to the application of Articles 85t and 103z of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
zamenja izbrane kmete s kmeti, ki so predmet pregleda na kraju samem, ki se izvaja v skladu z zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za te akte in standarde, pod pogojem, da ti kmetje vlagajo zahtevke za pomoč v okviru shem pomoči za neposredna plačila v smislu člena 2(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 ali v okviru shem pomoči, za katere se uporabljata člena 85t in 103z Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007.
In such cases the on-the-spot checks shall cover all aspects of the relevant acts or standards as defined under cross-compliance.
V takih primerih pregledi na kraju samem zajemajo vse vidike, ki so v zadevnih aktih ali standardih določeni v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo.
Furthermore the Member State shall ensure that the effectiveness of those on-the-spot checks is at least equal to that achieved when the on-the-spot checks are carried out by competent control authorities.’
Poleg tega država članica zagotovi, da so ti pregledi na kraju samem najmanj toliko učinkoviti kot tisti, ki jih izvajajo pristojni nadzorni organi.“
In Article 51(1), the following subparagraphs are inserted after the second subparagraph:
V členu 51(1) se za drugim pododstavkom vstavijo naslednji pododstavki:
‘A Member State may decide on the basis of a risk analysis to exclude farmers participating in a certification system as referred to in point (b) of the second subparagraph from the risk-based control sample.
„Država članica se lahko odloči na podlagi analize tveganja, da izključi kmete, ki sodelujejo v sistemu certificiranja iz točke (b) drugega pododstavka, iz kontrolnega vzorca, izbranega na podlagi tveganja.
However, when the certification system only covers part of the requirements and standards to be respected under cross-compliance by the farmer, appropriate risk factors shall be applied for the requirements or standards that are not covered by the certification system.
Vendar, kadar sistem certificiranja zajema le del zahtev in standardov, ki jih mora kmet upoštevati v okviru navzkrižne skladnosti, se za zahteve ali standarde, ki jih sistem certificiranja ne zajema, uporabijo primerni dejavniki tveganja.
When the analysis of control results reveals that there is a significant frequency of non-compliance with the requirements or standards included in a certification system as referred to in point (b) of the second subparagraph, the risk factors related to the requirements or standards concerned shall be re-assessed and, where appropriate, increased.’
Ko analiza rezultatov pregledov pokaže, da obstaja znatna pogostnost neupoštevanja zahtev ali standardov, vključenih v sistem certificiranja iz točke (b) drugega pododstavka, se dejavniki tveganja, povezani z zadevnimi zahtevami ali standardi, ponovno ocenijo in po potrebi povečajo.“
Article 54 is amended as follows:
Člen 54 se spremeni:
‘Every on-the-spot check under this Chapter, regardless whether the farmer in question was selected for the on-the-spot check in accordance with Article 51, checked on-the-spot pursuant to the legislation applicable to the acts and standards in accordance with Article 50(1a) or as a follow-up of non-compliances brought to the attention of the competent control authority in any other way, shall be the subject of a control report to be established by the competent control authority or under its responsibility.’
„Vsak pregled na kraju samem v skladu s tem poglavjem se, ne glede na to, ali je bil zadevni kmet izbran za pregled na kraju samem v skladu s členom 51 ali pa je bil pregledan na kraju samem v skladu z zakonodajo, ki se uporablja za akte in standarde v skladu s členom 50(1a), ali zaradi kršitev, za katere je pristojni nadzorni organ izvedel na kak drug način, vključi v poročilo o pregledu, ki ga pripravi pristojni nadzorni organ oziroma za katerega pripravo je slednji odgovoren.“
‘However, where the report does not contain any findings, a Member State may decide that such report is not sent, provided that it is made directly accessible to the paying agency or coordinating authority one month after its finalisation.’
„Vendar, kadar poročilo ne vsebuje nobenih izsledkov, lahko država članica odloči, da se tako poročilo ne pošlje, pod pogojem, da se da neposredno na voljo plačilni agenciji ali usklajevalnemu organu en mesec po tem, ko je končano.“
In Article 62, the words ‘Article 30(1) and (2)’ are replaced by ‘Article 29(1) and (2)’.
V členu 62 se izraz „člena 30(1) in (2)“ nadomesti z izrazom „člena 29(1) in (2)“.
It shall apply to aid applications relating to marketing years or premium periods starting from 1 January 2010.
Uporablja se za zahtevke za pomoč, ki se nanašajo na leta ali premijska obdobja, ki se začnejo s 1. januarjem 2010.
OJ L 316, 2.12.2009, p. 65.
UL L 316, 2.12.2009, str. 65.
OJ L 316, 2.12.2009, p. 27.
UL L 316, 2.12.2009, str. 27.