natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Accordingly, Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 sets out standard processing methods for processing plants and certain other plants and establishments.
Priloga IV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 določa standardne metode predelave za predelovalne obrate in nekatere druge obrate.
Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 allows for the disposal or use of animal by-products or derived products by way of alternative methods, provided that such methods have been authorised on the basis of an assessment of the capacity of those methods to reduce risks to public and animal health to a degree which is at least equivalent, for the relevant category of animal by-products, to the standard processing methods.
Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 dovoljuje odstranjevanje ali uporabo živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali pridobljenih proizvodov z alternativnimi metodami, če so bile takšne metode odobrene na podlagi ocene zmožnosti navedenih metod, da zmanjšajo tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali na raven, ki je vsaj enakovredna ravni standardnih metod predelave za relevantne kategorije živalskih stranskih proizvodov.
Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 also provides for a standard format for applications for alternative methods to be adopted.
Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 določa tudi standardno obliko za vloge za odobritev alternativnih metod.
Accordingly, Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 sets out alternative processing methods for processing plants and certain other plants and establishments.
Priloga IV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 določa alternativne metode predelave za predelovalne obrate in nekatere druge obrate.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has adopted three opinions in relation to such alternative methods: a scientific opinion adopted on 21 January 2009 on the Project to study alternatives to carcass destruction systems using the bunker system [4] (the bunker system project); a scientific opinion adopted on 8 July 2010 on Lime Treatment of Solid Pig and Poultry Manure [5]; and a scientific opinion adopted 22 September 2010 on the Neste Oil Application for a new alternative method of disposal or use of Animal By-Products [6].
(7) Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EFSA) je sprejela tri mnenja v zvezi s takšnimi alternativnimi metodami: znanstveno mnenje z dne 21. januarja 2009 o Projektu za preučitev alternativ za sistem uničenja trupov z uporabo sistema bunkerja [4] (projekt sistema bunkerja), znanstveno mnenje z dne 8. julija 2010 o Tretiranju trdega prašičjega in perutninskega gnoja z apnom [5] in znanstveno mnenje z dne 22. septembra 2010 o uporabi Neste Oil pri novi alternativni metodi za odstranitev ali uporabo živalskih stranskih proizvodov [6].
The bunker system project proposes the hydrolysis of pig cadavers and of other animal by-products from farmed pigs in a closed container on the site of a farm.
Projekt sistema bunkerja predlaga hidrolizo prašičjih trupov in drugih živalskih stranskih proizvodov iz gojenih prašičev v zaprtem zabojniku na farmi.
After a defined period of time, the hydrolysed materials obtained are to be disposed of by incineration or by processing, in accordance with the health rules on animal by-products as a first option.
Kot prvo možnost odstranitve predlaga sežig ali predelavo pridobljenih hidroliziranih snovi po določenem obdobju v skladu z zdravstvenimi pravili za živalske stranske proizvode.
The bunker system project also proposes the crushing and the subsequent pasteurization of pig cadavers and of other animal by-products from farmed pigs as a second option, prior to their disposal.
Projekt sistema bunkerja predlaga kot drugo možnost drobljenje in naknadno pasterizacijo prašičjih trupov in drugih živalskih stranskih proizvodov iz gojenih prašičev pred njihovim odstranjevanjem.
In its opinion of 21 January 2009 on the bunker system project, EFSA concluded that the information provided was not a sufficient basis for considering the second option as a safe means of disposal of animal by-products from pigs.
EFSA je v mnenju z dne 21. januarja 2009 o projektu sistema bunkerja navedla, da predložene informacije niso zadoščale za preučitev druge možnosti kot varnega načina odstranjevanja živalskih stranskih proizvodov iz prašičev.
Regarding the first option, based on hydrolysis, EFSA was also not able to deliver a final assessment.
EFSA tudi ni mogla sprejeti končne ocene glede prve možnosti na podlagi hidrolize.
However, EFSA indicated that the hydrolysed material would not pose an additional risk, provided it was further processed according to the health rules for Category 2 materials.
Vendar je EFSA navedla, da hidrolizirane snovi ne bodo pomenile dodatnega tveganja, če bodo dodatno predelane v skladu z zdravstvenimi pravili za snovi kategorije 2.
Therefore, the hydrolysis of animal by-products on the site of a holding should be permitted under conditions which prevent the transmission of diseases communicable to humans or animals and which avoid adverse effects to the environment.
Zato je treba dovoliti hidrolizo živalskih stranskih proizvodov na gospodarstvu pod pogoji, ki preprečujejo prenos prenosljivih bolezni na ljudi in živali ter preprečujejo škodljive učinke na okolje.
In particular, the hydrolysis should take place in a closed, leak-proof container which is separated from any farmed animals on the same site as a third option.
Tretja možnost je hidroliza v zaprtem in neprepustnem zabojniku, ki je ločen od vseh gojenih živalih na istem gospodarstvu.
However, since the hydrolysis methodology does not constitute a processing method, the specific conditions for the processing of animal by-products in such plants should not apply.
Ker hidroliza ni metoda predelave, se ne smejo zahtevati posebni pogoji za predelavo živalskih stranskih proizvodov v takšnih obratih.
The container should be regularly checked for the absence of corrosion, under official supervision, so that leakage of materials into the ground is prevented.
Zabojnik je treba redno pregledovati pod uradnim nadzorom, da ni sledi rje in se tako preprečuje uhajanje snovi v tla.
The ability of the hydrolysis methodology to reduce potential health risks has not yet been demonstrated.
Zmožnost, da lahko hidroliza zmanjša morebitna tveganja za zdravje, še ni bila dokazana.
Therefore, any handling or use of the hydrolysed material, other than incineration or co-incineration, with or without prior processing, or disposal in an authorised landfill, composting or transformation into biogas, where the latter three options are each to be preceded by pressure sterilisation, should be prohibited.
Zato je treba prepovedati kakršno koli ravnanje s hidroliziranimi snovmi ali njihovo uporabo, razen sežiga ali sosežiga, s predhodno predelavo ali brez nje, odstranjevanja na pooblaščenem odlagališču, kompostiranja ali pretvorbe v bioplin, pri čemer se pri vsaki od zadnjih treh možnosti predhodno opravi sterilizacija pod pritiskom.
Spain, Ireland, Latvia, Portugal and the United Kingdom have indicated an interest to allow their operators to use of the hydrolysis methodology.
Španija, Irska, Latvija, Portugalska in Združeno kraljestvo so izrazili interes, da svojim obratom dovolijo uporabo hidrolize.
The competent authorities of those Member States have confirmed that strict controls over such operators are to be carried out in order to prevent potential health risks.
Pristojni organi navedenih držav članic so potrdili, da bodo izvajali strog nadzor teh obratov za preprečevanje morebitnih tveganj za zdravje.
In its opinion of 8 July 2010 on a Lime Treatment of Solid Pig and Poultry Manure, EFSA concluded that the proposed mixing of lime with manure could be considered as a safe process for the inactivation of relevant bacterial and viral pathogens, in view of the intended application of the derived product, namely the mixture of lime with manure, to land.
EFSA je v mnenju z dne 8. julija 2010 o Tretiranju trdega prašičjega in perutninskega gnoja z apnom navedla, da se lahko predlagano mešanje apna in gnoja obravnava kot varen postopek za inaktivacijo ustreznih bakterijskih in virusnih patogenov zaradi predvidene uporabe pridobljenega proizvoda, tj. mešanice apna in gnoja, na tleh.
Since the application demonstrated the efficiency of the process only for a particular mixing device, EFSA recommended that when a different mixing device is to be used for the process, a validation should be carried out, on the basis of measurements of pH, time and temperature, to demonstrate that by using the different mixing device, an equivalent inactivation of pathogens is achieved.
Ker je bila v vlogi dokazana učinkovitost postopka le za posebno mešalno napravo, je EFSA priporočila, da se v primeru uporabe drugačne mešalne naprave opravi postopek validacije na podlagi meritev vrednosti pH, časa in temperature, da se dokaže enakovredna inaktivacija patogenov pri uporabi drugačne mešalne naprave.
A validation according to those principles should be carried out when quick lime (CaO), which was used for the process assessed by EFSA, is replaced by dolime (CaOMgO).
Postopek validacije v skladu z navedenimi načeli je treba opraviti, kadar se živo apno (CaO), ki je bilo uporabljen pri oceni EFSA, nadomesti z dolomitom (CaOMgO).
In its opinion of 22 September 2010 concerning a multi-step catalytic process for the production of renewable fuels, EFSA concluded that the process can be considered as safe, when rendered fats derived from Category 2 and Category 3 materials are used as starting materials and those rendered fats have been processed in accordance with the standard processing methods for animal by-products.
EFSA je v mnenju z dne 22. septembra 2010 glede večstopenjskega postopka katalize za proizvodnjo obnovljivih goriv navedla, da se lahko postopek šteje za varnega, ko se topljene maščobe, pridobljene iz snovi kategorij 2 in 3, uporabijo kot vhodne snovi in so bile predelane v skladu s standardnimi metodami predelave živalskih stranskih proizvodov.
However, the evidence presented did not allow a conclusion that the process is also capable of mitigating potential TSE risks which may be present in rendered fats derived from Category 1 materials.
Vendar ob predloženih dokazih ni bil možen sklep, da se lahko s postopkom zmanjšajo morebitna tveganja za TSE, ki so lahko prisotna zaradi topljenih maščob, pridobljenih iz snovi kategorije 1.
Therefore, the multi-step catalytic process should be authorised for rendered fats derived from Category 2 and Category 3 materials, while it should be rejected for rendered fats derived from Category 1 material.
Zato je treba večstopenjski postopek katalize odobriti za topljene maščobe, pridobljene iz snovi kategorij 2 in 3, ter zavrniti za pridobljene maščobe, pridobljene iz snovi kategorije 1.
While such rejection does not prevent the applicant from submitting further evidence to EFSA for a new assessment, the use of rendered fats derived from Category 1 material for the process should be prohibited, pending such assessment.
Takšna zavrnitev vlagatelju sicer ne preprečuje, da EFSA predloži dodatne dokaze za novo oceno, vendar je treba do zaključka takšne ocene prepovedati uporabo topljenih maščob, pridobljenih iz snovi kategorije 1.
Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 should be amended to take account of the conclusions of the three scientific opinions of the EFSA.
Prilogo IV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 je treba spremeniti, da se upoštevajo sklepi treh znanstvenih mnenj EFSA.
Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 provides for the adoption of implementing measures for the transformation of animal by-products into biogas or compost.
Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 določa, da je treba sprejeti izvedbene ukrepe glede pretvorbe živalskih stranskih proizvodov v bioplin ali kompost.
When animal by-products are mixed in a biogas plant or in a composting plant with materials of non-animal origin or with other materials which are not covered by that Regulation, the competent authority should be allowed to authorise the taking of representative samples after pasteurisation and before the mixing takes place, in order to test their compliance with microbiological criteria.
Kadar se živalski stranski proizvodi v obratu za pridobivanje bioplinov ali za kompostiranje mešajo s snovmi neživalskega izvora ali drugimi snovi, ki jih navedena uredba ne zajema, je treba pristojnim organom omogočiti, da lahko odobrijo jemanje reprezentativnih vzorcev po pasterizaciji in pred mešanjem, da se preveri izpolnjevanje mikrobioloških meril.
The taking of such samples should demonstrate whether the pasteurisation of animal by-products has mitigated microbiological risks in the animal by-products to be transformed.
Jemanje takih vzorcev mora pokazati, ali se s pasterizacijo živalskih stranskih proizvodov zmanjšajo mikrobiološka tveganja v živalskih stranskih proizvodih, ki se pretvarjajo.
Annex V of Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo V k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 provides for the adoption of a standard format for applications for alternative methods of use or disposal of animal by-products or derived products.
Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 določa oblikovanje standardnih vzorcev za vloge za alternativne metode uporabe ali odstranjevanja živalskih stranskih proizvodov ali pridobljenih proizvodov.
That format is to be used by interested parties when they submit an application for the authorisation of such methods.
Navedeni vzorec uporabijo zainteresirane strani pri predložitvi vloge za odobritev takšnih metod.
On request of the Commission, EFSA adopted a scientific opinion on 7 July 2010 on a statement on technical assistance on the format for applications for new alternative methods for animal by-products [7].
EFSA je 7. julija 2010 na zahtevo Komisije sprejela znanstveno mnenje o izjavi o tehnični pomoči glede vzorca za vloge za nove alternativne metode za živalske stranske proizvode [7].
In that statement, EFSA recommends, in particular, further clarifications regarding the information which interested parties should supply when they submit an application for the authorisation of a new alternative method.
EFSA je v navedeni izjavi priporočila, da se zlasti dodatno pojasnijo informacije, ki jih morajo zainteresirane strani vključiti v vlogo za odobritev novih alternativnih metod.
Taking account of the recommendations of that scientific opinion, the standard format for applications for new alternative methods set out in Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 should be amended.
Ob upoštevanju priporočil iz navedenega znanstvenega mnenja je treba spremeniti standardni vzorec za vloge za nove alternativne metode iz Priloge VII k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011.
Since renewable fuels from the multi-step catalytic process may also be produced from imported rendered fats, the import requirements for such fats and the conditions set out in the health certificate which must accompany consignments of rendered fats at the point of entry into the Union where the veterinary checks take place should be clarified.
Ker se lahko obnovljiva goriva, pridobljena v večstopenjskem postopku katalize, pridobijo tudi iz uvoženih topljenih maščob, je treba pojasniti zahteve glede uvoza takšnih maščob in pogoje iz veterinarskih spričeval, ki morajo spremljati pošiljke topljenih maščob na mestu vstopa v Unijo, kjer se izvajajo veterinarski pregledi.
Annexes XIV and XV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogi XIV in XV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Accordingly, Article 3 and Annexes II, IV, V, VII, VIII, XI and Annexes XIII to XVI should therefore be amended.
Spremeniti je treba tudi člen 3 in priloge II, IV, V, VII, VIII, XI ter priloge XIII do XVI.
A transitional period should be provided for after the entry into force of this Regulation, in order to allow for the continued importation into the Union of rendered fats not intended for human consumption for certain purposes outside the feed chain, as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 before the amendments introduced by this Regulation.
Zagotoviti je treba prehodno obdobje po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe, da se omogoči nemoten uvoz v Unijo topljenih maščob, ki niso namenjene za prehrano ljudi, za nekatere namene zunaj prehranske verige, kot je določeno v Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 pred spremembami, uvedenimi s to uredbo.
Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EU) št. 142/2011 se spremeni:
fur which fulfils the special requirements for the end point for that product set out in Chapter VIII of Annex XIII;
krzno, ki izpolnjuje posebne pogoje za končno točko za navedeni proizvod iz poglavja VIII Priloge XIII;
fish oil for the production of medicinal products which fulfils the special requirements for the end point for that product set out in Chapter XIII of Annex XIII;
ribje olje za proizvodnjo zdravil, ki izpolnjuje posebne pogoje za končno točko za navedeni proizvod iz poglavja XIII Priloge XIII;
gasoline and fuels which fulfil the specific requirements for products from the multi-step catalytic process for the production of renewable fuels set out in point 2(c) of Section 3 of Chapter IV of Annex IV.’
bencin in goriva, ki izpolnjujejo posebne pogoje za proizvode iz večstopenjskega postopka katalize za proizvodnjo obnovljivih goriv iz točke 2(c) oddelka 3 poglavja IV Priloge IV.“
Annexes II, IV, V, VII, VIII, XI and Annexes XIII to XVI are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloge II, IV, V, VII, VIII in XI ter priloge XIII do XVI se spremenijo v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
For a transitional period until 31 January 2012, consignments of rendered fats not intended for human consumption to be used for certain purposes outside the feed chain which are accompanied by a health certificate which has been signed and completed in accordance with the model set out in Chapter 10(B) of Annex XV to Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 before the date of entry into force of this Regulation, shall continue to be accepted for importation into the Union, provided that such certificates were completed and signed before 30 November 2011.
V prehodnem obdobju do 31. januarja 2012 se pošiljke topljenih maščob, ki niso namenjene za prehrano ljudi, temveč za nekatere namene zunaj prehranske verige, in jih spremlja veterinarsko spričevalo, podpisano in izpolnjeno v skladu z vzorcem iz poglavja 10(B) Priloge XV k Uredbi (EU) št. 142/2011 pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, sprejmejo za uvoz v Unijo, če je bilo spričevalo izpolnjeno in podpisano pred 30. novembrom 2011.
EFSA Journal (2009) 971, 1-12.
EFSA Journal (2009); 971:1–12.
In Annex II, Chapter I, point 1(a) is replaced by the following:
v Prilogi II se točka 1(a) v poglavju I nadomesti z naslednjim:
foxes (Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus);’
lisice (Vulpes vulpes in Alopex lagopus);“
In Annex IV, Chapter IV is amended as follows:
poglavje IV Priloge IV se spremeni:
In Section 1, point 1 is replaced by the following:
točka 1 oddelka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Materials resulting from the processing of Category 1 and 2 materials shall be permanently marked in accordance with the requirements for the marking of certain derived products set out in Chapter V of Annex VIII.
Snovi, ki nastanejo pri predelavi snovi kategorij 1 in 2, se trajno označijo v skladu z zahtevami za označevanje nekaterih pridobljenih proizvodov iz poglavja V Priloge VIII.
However, such marking shall not be required for the following materials referred to in Section 2:
Vendar takšno označevanje ni obvezno za naslednje snovi iz oddelka 2:
biodiesel produced in accordance with point D;
biodizel, proizveden v skladu s točko D;
hydrolysed materials referred to in point H;
hidrolizirane snovi iz točke H;
mixtures of pig and poultry manure with quick lime produced in accordance with point I;
mešanice prašičjega in perutninskega gnoja z živim apnom, proizvedene v skladu s točko I;
renewable fuels produced from rendered fats, which are derived from Category 2 materials, in accordance with point J.’
obnovljiva goriva, proizvedena iz topljenih maščob, ki so pridobljena iz snovi kategorije 2, v skladu s točko J.“
In Section 2, the following points are added:
v oddelku 2 se dodajo naslednje točke:
Hydrolysis with subsequent disposal
Hidroliza z naknadnim odstranjevanjem
The process of hydrolysis with subsequent disposal may be used in Spain, Ireland, Latvia, Portugal and the United Kingdom.
Postopek hidrolize z naknadnim odstranjevanjem se lahko uporablja v Španiji, na Irskem, v Latviji, na Portugalskem in v Združenem kraljestvu.
Following hydrolysis, the authorising competent authority must ensure that the materials are collected and disposed of within the same Member State referred to above.
Pristojni organ mora zagotoviti, da se snovi po hidrolizi zberejo in odstranijo v sami navedeni državi članici.
For this process, only the following materials may be used:
V tem postopku se lahko uporabijo samo naslednje snovi:
Category 2 materials referred to in Article 9(f)(i), (ii) and (iii) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 which are of porcine origin;
snovi kategorije 2 iz člena 9(f)(i), (ii) in (iii) Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009, ki so prašičjega izvora;
Category 3 materials referred to in Article 10(h) of that Regulation which are of porcine origin.
snovi kategorije 3 iz člena 10(h) navedene uredbe, ki so prašičjega izvora.
However, bodies or parts of bodies of animals that have died due to the presence of, or in order to eradicate an epizootic disease, may not be used
Vendar se ne smejo uporabiti trupi ali deli trupov živali, ki so umrle zaradi epizootske bolezni ali v okviru programa za njeno izkoreninjenje.
Hydrolysis with subsequent disposal is a temporary storage on the spot.
Hidroliza z naknadnim odstranjevanjem je začasno shranjevanje na kraju samem.
It shall be carried out according to the following standards:
Izvede se v skladu z naslednjimi standardi:
Following their collection on a holding for which the competent authority has authorised the use of the processing method, based on an assessment of the animal density of the holding, the likely mortality rate and the potential risks for public and animal health which may arise, the animal by-products must be placed into a container which has been constructed in accordance with point (b)(“the container”) and which has been placed at a dedicated site in accordance with points (c) and (d) (“the dedicated site”).
živalski stranski proizvodi se potem, ko se zberejo na gospodarstvu, na katerem je pristojni organ na podlagi gostote živali na gospodarstvu, verjetne stopnje smrtnosti in morebitnih tveganj za javno zdravje in zdravje živali odobril uporabo metode predelave, naložijo v zabojnik, ki je izdelan v skladu s točko (b) (‚zabojnik‘) in ki se postavi na določeno mesto v skladu s točkama (c) in (d) (‚določeno mesto‘);
The container must:
zabojnik mora:
have a device to close it;
imeti pripravo za zapiranje;
be water-proof, leak-proof and hermetically sealed;
biti vodotesen, neprepusten in hermetično zaprt;
be coated in a way which prevents corrosion;
biti premazan tako, da preprečuje rjavenje;
be equipped with a device for controlling emissions in accordance with point (e).
imeti pripomoček za nadzor emisij v skladu s točko (e);
The container must be placed in a dedicated site which is physically separate from the holding.
zabojnik se mora postaviti na določeno mesto, ki je fizično ločeno od gospodarstva.
That site must have dedicated access routes for the movement of materials and for collection vehicles.
Navedeno mesto mora imeti določene dostopne poti za premik snovi in vozil za zbiranje;
The container and the site must be constructed and laid out in accordance with Union legislation for the protection of the environment, in order to prevent odours and risks to soil and groundwater.
zabojnik in mesto morata biti izdelana in pripravljena v skladu z zakonodajo Unije za varovanje okolja, da se preprečijo slabe vonjave ter tveganja za tla in podtalnico;