natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
After 1 March 2009, the Dutch State developed a two-step system encouraging FBN to reduce its reliance on the State.
Po 1. marcu 2009 je Nizozemska razvila dvostopenjski sistem, ki je spodbujal banko FBN k zmanjšanju odvisnosti od države.
A first tranche of funding (irrespective of the maturity) was made available at EURIBOR + 25 basis points but once that threshold was exceeded, FBN could only get extra liquidity at EURIBOR + 50 basis points [54].
Prva tranša financiranja (ne glede na rok zapadlosti) je bila na voljo po obrestni meri EURIBOR + 25 bazičnih točk, ko pa je bil ta prag presežen, je lahko banka FBN pridobila dodatno likvidnost samo po obrestni meri EURIBOR + 50 bazičnih točk [54].
The amount of the total liquidity facility and the amount of the first threshold were gradually lowered.
Znesek skupnega likvidnostnega posojila in znesek prvega praga sta bila postopno znižana.
On 9 July 2009, the Dutch State informed the Commission that FBN had repaid all its short-term loans to the State.
Nizozemska je 9. julija 2009 obvestila Komisijo, da je banka FBN državi odplačala vsa kratkoročna posojila.
The long-term loans novated to the Dutch State (Measure Y2) amounted to EUR 16,1 billion, including EUR 8,15 billion of Tier 2 capital (of which EUR 3 billion upper Tier 2) and EUR 7,95 billion of senior loans.
Dolgoročna posojila, ki jih je prevzela Nizozemska (ukrep Y2), so znašala 16,1 milijarde EUR, vključno z 8,15 milijarde EUR kapitala drugega reda (od tega so bile 3 milijarde EUR presežnega kapitala drugega reda (upper Tier 2)) in 7,95 milijarde EUR prednostnih posojil.
On 24 December 2008, the Dutch State acquired ABN AMRO N from FBN for EUR 6,5 billion (‘Measure Z’).
Nizozemska je 24. decembra 2008 kupila banko ABN AMRO N od banke FBN za 6,5 milijarde EUR (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep Z).
The Dutch State did not pay in cash but paid for the purchase by cancelling EUR 6,5 billion of long-term debt it had obtained in the integrated transactions of 3 October 2008 as part of Measure Y2.
Nizozemska nakupa ni plačala z denarnimi sredstvi, ampak je za 6,5 milijarde EUR zmanjšala dolgoročni dolg, ki ga je prevzela v okviru celovitih transakcij z dne 3. oktobra 2008 kot del ukrepa Y2.
In other words, the Dutch State waived EUR 6,5 billion of claims towards FBN to pay for ABN AMRO N [55].
Z drugimi besedami, Nizozemska se je odpovedala terjatvi v višini 6,5 milijarde EUR nasproti banki FBN, da je kupila banko ABN AMRO N [55].
Measures covered by the Decision of 5 February 2010
Ukrepi, zajeti v sklepu z dne 5. februarja 2010
In January 2010, the Dutch State notified additional capital measures worth EUR 4,39 billion. The Dutch State subscribed to additional MCS-instruments of EUR 2,28 billion to cover additional separation costs (EUR 780 million, ‘Measure B3’), the capital shortfall resulting from the sale of New HBU (EUR 300 million, ‘Measure B4’) and integration costs (EUR 1,2 billion, ‘Measure B5’).
Nizozemska je januarja 2010 priglasila dodatne ukrepe v zvezi s kapitalom, vredne 4,39 milijarde EUR. Nizozemska je vpisala dodatne instrumente MCS v višini 2,28 milijarde EUR, da bi pokrila dodatne stroške ločitve (780 milijonov EUR, v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep B3), kapitalski primanjkljaj zaradi prodaje podružnice New HBU (300 milijonov EUR, v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep B4) in stroške integracije (1,2 milijarde EUR, ukrep B5).
To bring FBN’s Tier 1 capital in line with regulatory requirements, the Dutch State also converted EUR 1,35 billion of FBN-Tier 2 capital it already owned into Tier 1 capital (‘Measure C’).
Da bi kapital prvega reda banke FBN uskladila z regulativnimi zahtevami, je Nizozemska pretvorila 1,35 milijarde EUR kapitala drugega reda banke FBN, ki je že bil v lasti države, v kapital prvega reda (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep C).
The Dutch State also paid the other consortium members EUR 740 million in cash (‘Measure D’) as was foreseen in the CSA to settle issues that only emerged in the course of the separation process.
Nizozemska je drugim članom konzorcija tudi plačala 740 milijonov EUR v denarnih sredstvih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep D), kot je bilo predvideno v SDK, da bi rešila težave, ki so nastale med procesom ločitve.
Finally, the Dutch State also provided a guarantee on cross liabilities resulting from the sale of New HBU (‘Measure E’).
Prav tako je Nizozemska zagotovila jamstvo za navzkrižne obveznosti, nastale zaradi prodaje New HBU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep E).
Capital relief instrument (Measure A, capital equivalent of EUR 1,7 billion)
Instrument za razbremenitev kapitala (ukrep A, kapitalski ekvivalent v višini 1,7 milijarde EUR)
The Dutch State sold credit protection via a CDS on a Dutch mortgage portfolio of ABN AMRO N, representing around [30 - 80] % of ABN AMRO N’s total home loan portfolio. That measure had the effect of reducing the risk weighted assets of ABN AMRO N.
Nizozemska je z zamenjavo kreditnega tveganja prodala kreditno zavarovanje za nizozemski hipotekarni portfelj banke ABN AMRO N, ki predstavlja približno [30 – 80] % skupnega portfelja stanovanjskih posojil banke ABN AMRO N. Ta ukrep je zmanjšal tveganju prilagojena sredstva banke ABN AMRO N.
To remunerate the credit protection, the Dutch State received an annual fee of 51,5 basis points (calculated as a percentage of the portfolio value in the beginning of each reference period).
Da bi poplačala kreditno zavarovanje, nizozemska vlada prejema letno plačilo v višini 51,5 bazične točke (izračunane kot odstotek vrednosti portfelja na začetku vsakega referenčnega obdobja).
That fee was calculated using the capital equivalent cost methodology.
To plačilo je bilo izračunano z metodo stroškov kapitalskega ekvivalenta.
The Dutch State determined how much capital ABN AMRO N could free up due to the capital relief instrument (namely EUR 1,7 billion, based on Basel I requirements which were still applied at the time the CRI agreement was implemented) and then it calculated a return of 10 % on that capital relief (namely 10 % on EUR 1,7 billion), which was equivalent to 51,5 basis points of the initial portfolio value of EUR 34,5 billion.
Nizozemska je ocenila, koliko kapitala bi banka ABN AMRO N lahko sprostila zaradi instrumenta za razbremenitev kapitala (namreč 1,7 milijarde EUR, na podlagi zahtev Basla I, ki so še vedno veljale v času, ko je bil sprejet dogovor glede razbremenitve kapitala), nato pa je izračunala donos v višini 10 % na to razbremenitev kapitala (namreč 10 % na 1,7 milijarde EUR), kar je bilo enako 51,5 bazične točke prvotne vrednosti portfelja v višini 34,5 milijarde EUR.
Each year, ABN AMRO N kept a first loss tranche of 20 basis points (calculated as a percentage of the initial portfolio value).
Banka ABN AMRO N je vsako leto ohranila tranšo prve izgube v višini 20 bazičnih točk (izračunano kot odstotek prvotne vrednosti portfelja).
ABN AMRO N kept a vertical slice of 5 % of the remaining risk.
Banka ABN AMRO N je ohranila navpični prerez preostalega tveganja v višini 5 %.
The pricing of the credit protection instrument would not be adjusted once ABN AMRO N fully adopted Basel II capital requirments, even though the capital relief effect of the CRI would then be substantially smaller.
Oblikovanje cen instrumenta kreditnega zavarovanja potem, ko bi banka ABN AMRO N v celoti sprejela kapitalske zahteve Basla II, ne bi bilo prilagojeno, čeprav bi bil učinek razbremenitve kapitala instrumenta za razbremenitev kapitala precej manjši.
In principle, the CDS-contract had a maturity of 7 years, but ABN AMRO N had call options enabling it to terminate the contract on a number of pre-determined reference dates (for example October 2010, January 2011 and January 2012) [57].
Načeloma je imel dogovor o zamenjavi kreditnega tveganja rok zapadlosti sedem let, vendar je imela banka ABN AMRO N nakupno opcijo, ki ji je omogočala, da prekine dogovor ob različnih predhodno določenih referenčnih datumih (npr. oktobra 2010, januarja 2011 in januarja 2012) [57].
Under the CSA, the three consortium partners had to ensure that ABN AMRO Z remained sufficiently capitalised.
V okviru zamenjave kreditnega tveganja so morali trije partnerji konzorcija zagotoviti, da je bila ABN AMRO Z dovolj kapitalizirana.
In that context, the Dutch State had to contribute EUR 2,2 billion to the ABN AMRO Z capital shortfall. The aim of the CRI was to allow ABN AMRO N to make part of that EUR 2,2 billion contribution to ABN AMRO Z.
Zaradi tega je morala Nizozemska prispevati 2,2 milijarde EUR za kapitalski primanjkljaj ABN AMRO Z. Namen instrumenta za razbremenitev kapitala je bil omogočiti banki ABN AMRO N, da izplača del prispevka za ABN AMRO Z v višini 2,2 milijarde EUR.
The Dutch State preferred the unconventional CRI-solution over a traditional capital increase since, prior to the separation, it could not ring-fence capital contributions in ABN AMRO Bank.
Nizozemska se je namesto za običajno povečanje lastniškega kapitala raje odločila za neobičajno rešitev z instrumentom za razbremenitev kapitala, saj pred ločitvijo ni mogla preprečiti kapitalskih prispevkov v skupini ABN AMRO Bank.
In other words, since ABN AMRO N was not a separate legal entity, a capital injection in ABN AMRO Bank could also have benefited the other two consortium members.
Z drugimi besedami, ker banka ABN AMRO N ni bila ločen subjekt, bi lahko kapitalska injekcija v skupini ABN AMRO Bank koristila tudi drugima dvema članoma konzorcija.
That course of action could have had severe implications especially in scenarios of increased distress.
Tak potek dogodkov bi lahko imel hude posledice, zlasti v scenarijih povečanih težav.
When the separation took place, ABN AMRO N became a separate legal entity (the new ABN AMRO Bank).
Po ločitvi je banka ABN AMRO N postala ločen pravni subjekt (nova banka ABN AMRO Bank).
The Dutch State continued to bear the responsibility under the CSA to fill the EUR 2,2 billion capital shortage of ABN AMRO Z. The Dutch State decided that ABN AMRO N should use cash from MCS-instruments (namely Measure B3 insofar as it related to the prudential margin of EUR 500 million and EUR 1,2 billion of Measure B5) to inject EUR 1,7 billion in ABN AMRO Z, while it kept the CRI in place in the new ABN AMRO Bank to cover the prudential margin of EUR 500 million and the integration costs of EUR 1,2 billion.
Nizozemska je bila v skladu z dogovorom o zamenjavi kreditnega tveganja še vedno odgovorna za to, da odpravi kapitalski primanjkljaj ABN AMRO Z v višini 2,2 milijarde EUR. Nizozemska se je odločila, da bo banka ABN AMRO N uporabila denarna sredstva instrumentov MCS (tj. ukrep B3, kolikor je povezan s smotrno razliko v višini 500 milijonov EUR, in 1,2 milijarde EUR ukrepa B5) za finančno injekcijo v višini 1,7 milijarde EUR v ABN AMRO Z, pri tem pa je ohranila instrument za razbremenitev kapitala v novi banki ABN AMRO Bank, da je pokrila smotrno razliko v višini 500 milijonov EUR in stroške integracije v višini 1,2 milijarde EUR.
Mandatory Convertible Security to cover part of the of ABN AMRO Z capital shortfall (Measure B1, EUR 500 million)
Obvezno zamenljiv vrednostni papir za kritje dela kapitalskega primanjkljaja ABN AMRO Z (ukrep B1, 500 milijonov EUR)
Since the CRI did not suffice to cover the entire EUR 2,2 billion capital shortfall of ABN AMRO Z, the Dutch State provided extra capital to ABN AMRO Bank via an MCS.
Ker instrument za razbremenitev kapitala ni zadoščal za kritje celotnega kapitalskega primanjkljaja ABN AMRO Z v višini 2,2 milijarde EUR, je Nizozemska prek obvezno zamenljivega vrednostnega papirja (MCS) ABN AMRO Bank priskrbela dodatni kapital.
The conversion took place at nominal value [59].
Pretvorba je bila izvedena po nominalni vrednosti [59].
The measure allowed ABN AMRO II (renamed ABN AMRO Bank) to contribute EUR 500 million to ABN AMRO Z.
Ukrep je omogočil ABN AMRO II (preimenovani v ABN AMRO Bank), da za ABN AMRO Z prispeva 500 milijonov EUR.
Mandatory Convertible Security to cover separation costs (Measures B2 and B3, EUR 1,08 billion in total)
Obvezno zamenljiv vrednostni papir za kritje stroškov ločitve (ukrepa B2 in B3, skupaj 1,08 milijarde EUR)
In order to cover costs related to the separation of ABN AMRO N from ABN AMRO Bank, the Dutch State subscribed to additional MCS.
Da bi pokrila stroške, povezane z ločitvijo banke ABN AMRO N od ABN AMRO Bank, je Nizozemska vpisala dodatni obvezno zamenljiv vrednostni papir.
A first tranche of roughly EUR 300 million (Measure B2) was notified in July 2009, with the remainder (namely EUR 780 million) notified in January 2010 (Measure B3).
Prva tranša v višini približno 300 milijonov EUR (ukrep B2) je bila priglašena julija 2009, preostanek (tj. 780 milijonov EUR) pa januarja 2010 (ukrep B3).
The full amount of EUR 1,08 billion (namely Measures B2 and B3 together) was needed to cover the following costs:
Celotni znesek v višini 1,08 milijarde EUR (tj. ukrepa B2 in B3 skupaj) je bil potreben za kritje naslednjih stroškov:
EUR 480 million of well-defined separation costs;
480 milijonov EUR dobro opredeljenih stroškov ločitve,
EUR 90 million to set up a money market desk; and
90 milijonov EUR za vzpostavitev poslovanja z denarnim trgom, in
EUR 500 million to provide for a prudential margin.
500 milijonov EUR za smotrno razliko.
The Dutch State provided a further breakdown of the separation costs of EUR 480 million. They related to cross liabilities exposure (EUR [0 - 200] million), unwinding of risk allocation letters (EUR [0 - 200] million), repurchase of securitisation notes (EUR [0 - 200] million), the transfer from ABN AMRO R of trading-related market risk of ABN AMRO N customers (EUR [0 - 200] million), discontinuation of capital relief instruments (EUR [0 - 200] million) and sundry separation and unwinding costs (EUR [0 - 300] million).
Nizozemska je predložila nadaljnjo razčlenitev stroškov ločitve v višini 480 milijonov EUR. Povezani so bili z izpostavljenostjo navzkrižnih obveznosti ([0 – 200] milijonov EUR), preklicem listin o razporeditvi tveganja ([0 – 200] milijonov EUR), ponovnim nakupom listinjenih obveznic ([0 – 200] milijonov EUR), prenosom tržnega tveganja, povezanega s trgovanjem strank banke ABN AMRO N, z ABN AMRO R, ([0 – 200] milijonov EUR), prenehanjem instrumentov za razbremenitev kapitala ([0 – 200] milijonov EUR) ter različnimi stroški ločitve in prenehanja ([0 – 300] milijonov EUR).
After the separation from its parent company ABN AMRO Bank, ABN AMRO II needed to set up a money market desk on its own, which cost EUR 90 million.
ABN AMRO II je morala po ločitvi od svojega matičnega podjetja ABN AMRO Bank vzpostaviti poslovanje z denarnim trgom, kar je stalo 90 milijonov EUR.
Finally, the Dutch State injected another EUR 500 million in capital to ensure that ABN AMRO N could operate with some margin above the minimum regulatory requirements.
Nizozemska je vložila še dodatnih 500 milijonov EUR v kapital za zagotovitev, da bo banka ABN AMRO N lahko poslovala nekoliko nad minimalnimi regulativnimi zahtevami.
Mandatory Convertible Security to cover capital shortfall due to sale of New HBU (Measure B4, EUR 300 million)
Obvezno zamenljiv vrednostni papir za kritje kapitalskega primanjkljaja zaradi prodaje podružnice New HBU (ukrep B4, 300 milijonov EUR)
FBN and ABN AMRO N could only merge once the concentration issues identified in the Merger Decision were resolved.
Banki FBN in ABN AMRO N sta se lahko združili šele, ko so bile rešene težave s koncentracijo, opredeljene v sklepu o združitvi.
Therefore, the Dutch State decided to sell New HBU and IFN to Deutsche Bank.
Zato se je Nizozemska odločila, da bo podružnici New HBU in IFN prodala banki Deutsche Bank.
That transaction resulted however in an additional capital need of EUR 470 million, which ABN AMRO N could not deal with entirely on its own.
Zaradi te transakcije se je pojavila potreba po dodatnem kapitalu v višini 470 milijonov EUR, ki ga banka ABN AMRO N ni mogla zagotoviti sama.
The Dutch State decided to help and injected EUR 300 million in the form of MCS [60].
Nizozemska se je odločila, da bo pomagala, in vložila 300 milijonov EUR v obliki obvezno zamenljivega vrednostnega papirja [60].
Mandatory Convertible Security to cover integration costs (Measure B5, EUR 1,2 billion)
Obvezno zamenljiv vrednostni papir za kritje stroškov integracije (ukrep B5, 1,2 milijarde EUR)
To implement the merger, ABN AMRO N and FBN (and after the merger ABN AMRO Group) had to pay for upfront integration costs of EUR 1,2 billion (after tax), related to redundancy costs, the integration of ICT platforms and the restructuring of the branch network.
Zaradi združitve sta morali banki ABN AMRO N in FBN (in po združitvi skupina ABN AMRO) plačati vnaprejšnje stroške integracije v višini 1,2 milijarde EUR (po obdavčitvi), povezane s stroški zmanjšanja števila zaposlenih, uvedbo platform IKT in prestrukturiranjem mreže podružnic.
Since ABN AMRO N and FBN were not able to finance those costs themselves, the Dutch State decided to inject capital in the form of MCS [61].
Ker banki ABN AMRO N in FBN teh stroškov nista mogli financirati sami, se je Nizozemska odločila, da bo vložila kapital v obliki obvezno zamenljivega vrednostnega papirja [61].
Conversion of FBN Tier 2 hybrid capital into core Tier 1 capital (Measure C, EUR 1,35 billion)
Pretvorba hibridnega kapitala drugega reda banke FBN v osnovni kapital prvega reda (ukrep C, 1,35 milijarde EUR)
FBN was obliged to increase its Tier 1 capital after the DNB [62] had indicated that there was a Tier 1 capital shortage of approximately EUR 1,26 billion. After the separation from its parent company Fortis SA/NV, FBN also had to spend EUR 90 million to cover costs related to the set up of a treasury desk, Basel-related models, licenses and consultancy services.
Banka FBN je morala povečati svoj kapital prvega reda potem, ko je organ DNB [62] navedel, da ima primanjkljaj kapitala prvega reda v višini približno 1,26 milijarde EUR. Banka FBN je morala po ločitvi od svojega matičnega podjetja Fortis SA/NV porabiti 90 milijonov EUR za vzpostavitev poslovanja zakladništva, za modele, povezane z Baslom, za dovoljenja in storitve svetovanja.
Payment obligations towards other consortium members (Measure D, EUR 740 million)
Plačilne obveznosti do drugih članov konzorcija (ukrep D, 740 milijonov EUR)
When the consortium members negotiated the acquisition of ABN AMRO Holding in 2007, they realised that not all facts were already known at the time.
Ko so se člani konzorcija pogodili glede nakupa holdinga ABN AMRO Holding leta 2007, so ugotovili, da v tistem času še niso bila znana vsa dejstva.
Therefore, the CSA contained a number of general principles to settle certain payment obligations, which would only become apparent during the separation process.
Zato je SDK vseboval številna splošna načela za poravnavo določenih plačilnih obveznosti, ki bi postala jasna šele med postopkom ločitve.
The exact amounts result from a negotiating process in which the Dutch State (and Fortis SA/NV before it) participated.
Natančni zneski so rezultat procesa pogajanj, v katerih je sodelovala Nizozemska (in pred njo holding Fortis SA/NV).
The total amount of EUR 740 million relates to:
Celotni znesek 740 milijonov EUR je povezan z:
Those cash outflows are partly compensated by the fact that the Dutch State received […] from the other consortium members related to stranded costs.
Ti denarni odtoki so bili delno povrnjeni s tem, ko je Nizozemska od drugih članov konzorcija prejela […], povezane z nasedlimi naložbami.
The balance of the payment obligations in respect of other consortium members (namely EUR 740 million) was paid in cash, in part directly to the other consortium members and in part to ABN AMRO Bank (now RBS NV).
Preostanek plačilnih obveznosti v zvezi z drugimi člani konzorcija (tj. 740 milijonov EUR) je bil plačan z denarnimi sredstvi, delno neposredno drugim članom konzorcija in delno banki ABN AMRO Bank (zdaj RBS NV).
Cross liabilities (Measure E, EUR 950 million)
Navzkrižne obveznosti (ukrep E, 950 milijonov EUR)
Even after the divestment of New HBU, ABN AMRO Bank (now RBS NV) and ABN AMRO II (or its legal successors) will remain liable towards creditors of New HBU if New HBU is unable to meet its obligations towards its own creditors.
Tudi po odprodaji podružnice New HBU bosta ABN AMRO Bank (zdaj RBS NV) in ABN AMRO II (ali njeni pravni nasledniki) še vedno dolžni upnikom New HBU, če New HBU ne bo izpolnila svojih obveznosti do lastnih upnikov.
Likewise New HBU will face cross liabilities towards creditors of ABN AMRO Bank and ABN AMRO II.
Prav tako se bo morala New HBU soočiti z navzkrižnimi obveznostmi do upnikov ABN AMRO Bank in ABN AMRO II.
Since the cross liabilities were rooted in the sale of New HBU which resulted from a decision of ABN AMRO II and its shareholders, it was also their responsibility to find a solution.
Ker navzkrižne obveznosti izhajajo iz prodaje New HBU, za katero so se odločili ABN AMRO II in njeni delničarji, je bila tudi njihova odgovornost, da najdejo rešitev.
The proposed solution implied that the Dutch State and Deutsche Bank (namely the purchaser of New HBU) agreed that new HBU and ABN AMRO II would indemnify each other for those cross liabilities by providing each other collateral, so as to reduce the induced regulatory capital requirements to a desired 20 %.
Predlagana rešitev je bil dogovor med Nizozemsko in banko Deutsche Bank (tj. kupcem New HBU), da New HBU in ABN AMRO II druga drugi poravnata te navzkrižne obveznosti tako, da druga drugi zagotovita varščino in s tem nastale regulativne kapitalske zahteve znižata na zaželenih 20 %.
As a result of that agreement, ABN AMRO II had to provide collateral to New HBU for an amount up to EUR 950 million (declining over time as underlying liabilities mature) for the liabilities of New HBU towards ABN AMRO II and towards ABN AMRO Bank (now RBS NV).
Zaradi tega dogovora je morala ABN AMRO II zagotoviti varščino New HBU v znesku do 950 milijonov EUR (ki se sčasoma, ko osnovne obveznosti zapadejo, zmanjšuje) za obveznosti New HBU do ABN AMRO II in do ABN AMRO Bank (zdaj RBS NV).
Since ABN AMRO II did not have the means to provide the collateral needed in respect of the liability towards ABN AMRO Bank (now RBS NV), the State provided a counter-indemnity in the form of a guarantee on the debt of ABN AMRO Bank (now RBS NV).
Ker ABN AMRO II ni imela sredstev za varščino, potrebno zaradi obveznosti do ABN AMRO Bank (zdaj RBS NV), je država zagotovila jamstvo povračila odškodnine v obliki jamstva na dolg ABN AMRO Bank (zdaj RBS NV).
The Dutch State priced that risk as if it was a State guarantee on ABN AMRO Bank (now RBS NV) subordinated debt.
Nizozemska je to tveganje ocenila kot državno jamstvo na podrejeni dolg ABN AMRO Bank (zdaj RBS NV).
The pricing – based on the European Central Bank (‘ECB’) Recapitalisation Recommendation [64]– was set at 200 basis points plus the median CDS-spread [65].
Oblikovanje cen – na podlagi priporočila Evropske centralne banke (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ECB) za rekapitalizacijo [64] – je bilo 200 bazičnih točk plus srednja vrednost razpona kreditnih zamenjav [65].
Table 4 summarises the measures assessed in this Decision.
V preglednici 4 so povzeti ukrepi, obravnavani v tem sklepu.
More specifically, Measure A was used from that date on for the objectives of Measure B3 (insofar as it concerns the prudential margin) and Measure B5 and vice versa.
Natančneje, ukrep A se je od navedenega datuma uporabljal za dosego ciljev ukrepa B3 (kolikor se nanaša na smotrno razliko) ter ukrepa B5 in obratno.
State support measures
Ukrepi državne pomoči
Legal entity to which the measure is granted
Pravni subjekt, kateremu je odobren ukrep
ST funding
kratkoročno financiranje
LT funding
dolgoročno financiranje
FBN (to allow repayment to Fortis Bank SA/NV)
FBN (za poplačilo Fortis Bank SA/NV
Acquisition of ABN AMRO N
nakup ABN AMRO N
FBN (purchase price paid by waiving debt)
FBN (nakupna cena, plačana z opustitvijo dolga)
Capital measures notified in July 2009 and implemented in July/August 2009
Ukrepi v zvezi s kapitalom, priglašeni julija 2009 in izvedeni julija/avgusta 2009
Capital relief instrument
instrument za razbremenitev kapitala