natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Georgia is recognised at the level of the European Union under the procedure established by Article 18(3)(c) of Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the minimum level of training of seafarers [3], as recognitions of Georgian certificates by Italy and Greece are published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] and therefore remain valid in accordance with Article 19(5) of Directive 2008/106/EC, in spite of the fact that Directive 2001/25/EC has been repealed.
Gruzija je priznana na ravni Evropske unije s postopkom iz člena 18(3)(c) Direktive 2001/25/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. aprila 2001 o minimalni ravni izobraževanja pomorščakov [3], ker so priznanja gruzijskih spričeval s strani Italije in Grčije objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4], ostanejo veljavna v skladu s členom 19(5) Direktive 2008/106/ES, ne glede na to, da je bila Direktiva 2001/25/ES razveljavljena.
The Commission assessed the maritime education, training and certification systems in Georgia, in line with Article 21(1) of Directive 2008/106/EC, to verify whether this country continues to comply with the requirements of the STCW Convention and whether appropriate measures have been taken to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Komisija je ocenila sisteme pomorskega izobraževanja, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval v Gruziji v skladu s členom 21(1) Direktive 2008/106/ES, da bi preverila, ali ta država še naprej izpolnjuje zahteve konvencije STCW ter ali je sprejela ustrezne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali.
This assessment, which was based on the results of a fact-finding inspection performed by experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency in September 2006, revealed several deficiencies.
Ocena, ki je temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcijskega pregleda za ugotavljanje dejstev, ki so ga opravili strokovnjaki Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost septembra 2006, je odkrila več pomanjkljivosti.
The Commission provided the Member States with a report on the results of the assessment of compliance.
Komisija je državam članicam predložila poročilo o rezultatih ocene skladnosti.
Subsequently, the Commission requested the Georgian authorities, by letters of 27 February 2009 and 23 March 2010, to provide evidence demonstrating whether the deficiencies detected during the assessment were adequately addressed.
Nato je Komisija v dopisih z dne 27. februarja 2009 in 23. marca 2010 od gruzijskih organov zahtevala, naj predložijo dokaz, s katerim bi prikazali, ali so bile pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med ocenjevanjem, ustrezno odpravljene.
Where deficiencies had been identified during the assessment of compliance with the STCW Convention, the Georgian authorities provided to the Commission on its request, by letters of 1 May 2009, 12 January 2010, 17 February 2010 and 14 April 2010, some information concerning the implementation of corrective action as regards these issues.
Kjer so bile med ocenjevanjem skladnosti s konvencijo STCW ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti, so gruzijski organi v dopisih z dne 1. maja 2009, 12. januarja 2010, 17. februarja 2010 in 14. aprila 2010 predložili Komisiji nekatere informacije glede izvajanja korektivnih ukrepov za urejanje teh zadev.
The evaluation of the replies of the Georgian authorities, which was conducted by the Commission, confirmed that the information provided address only a very minor part of these deficiencies, while it revealed that the majority of the deficiencies that were identified during the assessment of compliance remain unresolved.
Komisija je opravila oceno odgovorov gruzijskih organov, iz katere je razvidno, da podane informacije zadevajo zgolj manjši del pomanjkljivosti ter, da je večina pomanjkljivosti, odkritih med oceno skladnosti, še vedno nerešenih.
These deficiencies concern several sections of the STCW Convention and especially missing national provisions to implement some requirements of the STCW Convention, such as in particular the implementation of a quality standards system and the use of simulators, the functioning of the quality standards system both in the administration and some maritime education and training institutions, the monitoring of these institutions by the administration, as well as numerous certification requirements relating to both the deck and engine departments.
Te pomanjkljivosti zadevajo številna področja konvencije STCW, zlasti manjkajoče nacionalne določbe za izvajanje nekaterih zahtev konvencije STCW, kot je na primer izvajanje sistema standardov kakovosti in uporabo simulatorjev, delovanje sistema standardov kakovosti v javni upravi ter v nekaterih zavodih za pomorsko izobraževanje in usposabljanje, nadzor teh zavodov, ki bi ga morala opravljati javna uprava, kot tudi številne zahteve za izdajanje spričeval za pomorščake na krovu in v ladijski strojnici.
These non-conformities affect various core provisions of the STCW Convention and risk affecting the overall level of competence of seafarers holding certificates issued by Georgia.
Te pomanjkljivosti zadevajo številne bistvene določbe konvencije STCW in ogrožajo splošno raven strokovnosti pomorščakov s spričevali iz Gruzije.
The outcome of the assessment of compliance and the evaluation of the information provided by the Georgian authorities demonstrate that Georgia does not comply fully with the relevant requirements of the STCW Convention and therefore its recognition by the European Union should be withdrawn.
Izid ocenjevanja skladnosti in ocena informacij, ki so jih poslali gruzijski organi, kažeta, da Gruzija ne izpolnjuje v celoti zadevnih zahtev konvencije STCW in zato bi Evropska unija morala priznanje preklicati.
The recognition of Georgia that was granted according to Article 18(3)(c) of Directive 2001/25/EC is withdrawn as regards education, training and certification of seafarers, for the purpose of recognition of certificates of competency issued by this country.
Priznavanje Gruzije v skladu s členom 18(3)(c) Direktive 2001/25/ES glede izobrazbe, usposabljanja in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakov v smislu priznavanja spričeval o usposobljenosti, ki jih izda ta država, se prekliče.
OJ C 268, 7.11.2003, p. 7, and OJ C 85, 7.4.2005, p. 8.
UL C 268, 7.11.2003, str. 7 in UL C 85, 7.4.2005, str. 8.
on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas
o podpisu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov v imenu Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(2)(a), in conjunction with Article 218(5), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti točke (a) člena 77(2) v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
On 27 November 2008 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with Georgia on an agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Agreement’).
Svet je 27. novembra 2008 pooblastil Komisijo za začetek pogajanj o sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov (v nadaljnem besedilu: Sporazum).
The negotiations were successfully concluded and the Agreement was initialled on 25 November 2009.
Pogajanja so bila 25. novembra 2009 uspešno končana in Sporazum je bil parafiran.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [1]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [1]; Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoč in se v njem ne uporablja.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [2]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [2]. Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
The Agreement should be signed subject to its conclusion,
Sporazum bi bilo treba podpisati, s pridržkom njegove sklenitve –
The signing of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Agreement’) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement [3].
Podpis Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o poenostavitvi izdajanja vizumov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) se odobri v imenu Evropske unije, s pridržkom sklenitve navedenega sporazuma [3].
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union subject to its conclusion.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za podpis Sporazuma v imenu Unije s pridržkom njegove sklenitve.
The texts of the Agreement, the Protocol and the Declarations will be published together with the decision on the conclusion of the Agreement.
Besedila Sporazuma, Protokola in Izjav bodo objavljena skupaj s sklepom o sklenitvi Sporazuma.
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 148(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 148(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the opinion of the Employment Committee [4],
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje [4],
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) stipulates in Article 145 that Member States and the Union shall work towards developing a coordinated strategy for employment and particularly for promoting a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce as well as labour markets that are responsive to economic change and with a view to achieving the objectives defined in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
V členu 145 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je določeno, da si države članice in Unija prizadevajo za razvoj usklajene strategije zaposlovanja in zlasti za spodbujanje kvalificirane, usposobljene in prilagodljive delovne sile kot tudi trgov dela, ki se odzivajo na gospodarske spremembe, z namenom, da bi dosegle cilje, opredeljene v členu 3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
Member States, having regard to national practices related to the responsibilities of management and labour, shall regard promoting employment as a matter of common concern and shall coordinate their action in this respect within the Council, in accordance with the provisions of Article 148 of the TFEU.
Države članice ob upoštevanju nacionalnih praks glede odgovornosti socialnih partnerjev obravnavajo spodbujanje zaposlovanja kot zadevo skupnega pomena in usklajujejo svoje delovanje v zvezi s tem v okviru Sveta skladno z določbami člena 148 PDEU.
The TEU stipulates in Article 3(3) that the Union shall aim at full employment and shall combat social exclusion and discrimination, and shall promote social justice and protection and provides for the Union’s initiatives to ensure coordination of Member States’ social policies.
V členu 3(3) PEU je določeno, da je Unija usmerjena v polno zaposlenost, se bori proti socialni izključenosti in diskriminaciji ter spodbuja socialno pravičnost in varstvo, določeno pa je tudi, da lahko daje Unija pobude za zagotovitev usklajenosti socialnih politik držav članic.
Article 8 of the TFEU stipulates that in all its activities, the Union shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women.
V členu 8 PDEU je določeno, da si Unija v vseh svojih dejavnostih prizadeva odpraviti neenakosti ter spodbujati enakost med moškimi in ženskami.
Article 9 thereof provides that in defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union shall take into account requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education and training.
V členu 9 Pogodbe je določeno, da pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju svojih politik in dejavnosti Unija upošteva zahteve, ki so povezane s spodbujanjem visoke stopnje zaposlenosti, zagotavljanjem ustrezne socialne zaščite, bojem proti socialni izključenosti ter visoko stopnjo izobraževanja in usposabljanja.
The TFEU provides that employment guidelines and broad economic policy guidelines are to be adopted by the Council to guide Member States’ policies.
V PDEU je določeno, da smernice za zaposlovanje in širše smernice ekonomskih politik, sprejme Svet, da bi usmerjal politike držav.
The Lisbon Strategy, launched in 2000, was based on an acknowledgement of the EU’s need to increase its employment, productivity and competitiveness, while enhancing social cohesion, in the face of global competition, technological change, environmental challenges and an ageing population.
Lizbonska strategija, ki je bila uvedena leta 2000, je temeljila na ugotovitvi, da mora EU glede na svetovno konkurenco, tehnološke spremembe, okoljske izzive in staranje prebivalstva povečati zaposlenost, produktivnost in konkurenčnost ter obenem okrepiti socialno kohezijo.
The Lisbon Strategy was relaunched in 2005, after a mid-term review which led to greater focus on growth and more and better jobs.
Lizbonska strategija je ponovno zaživela leta 2005 po vmesnem pregledu, na podlagi katerega je bilo več pozornosti namenjene rasti ter več in boljšim delovnim mestom.
The Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs helped forge consensus around the broad direction of the EU’s economic and employment policies.
Lizbonska strategija za rast in delovna mesta je pripomogla k oblikovanju soglasja o širši usmerjenosti ekonomskih politik EU in njenih politik zaposlovanja.
Under the strategy, both broad economic policy guidelines and employment guidelines were adopted by the Council Decision 2005/600/EC [5] and revised in Council Decision 2008/618/EC [6].
V okviru te strategije so bile s Sklepom Sveta 2005/600/ES [5] sprejete širše smernice ekonomskih politik in smernice za zaposlovanje ter pregledane s Sklepom Sveta 2008/618/ES [6] pregledal.
The 24 guidelines laid the foundations for the National Reform Programmes, outlining the key macroeconomic, microeconomic and labour market reform priorities for the Union as a whole.
Teh 24 smernic je osnova nacionalnih programov reform, v katerih so opisane ključne prednostne naloge reform na področjih makroekonomije, mikroekonomije in trga dela za celotno Unijo.
However, experience shows that the guidelines did not set clear enough priorities and that links between them could have been stronger.
Vendar izkušnje kažejo, da prednostne naloge v smernicah niso bile dovolj jasno določene in da bi lahko bile med seboj bolj povezane.
This limited their impact on national policymaking.
To je omejilo njihov vpliv na oblikovanje politik na nacionalni ravni.
The financial and economic crisis that started in 2008 resulted in a significant loss in jobs and potential output and has led to a dramatic deterioration in public finances.
Finančna in gospodarska kriza, ki se je začela leta 2008, je povzročila znatno izgubo delovnih mest in padec potencialne rasti proizvodnje ter izrazito poslabšanje javnih financ.
The European Economic Recovery Plan has nevertheless helped Member States to deal with the crisis, partly through a coordinated fiscal stimulus, with the euro providing an anchor for macroeconomic stability.
Vendar je evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva pomagal državam članicam pri spopadanju s krizo, deloma z usklajeno fiskalno spodbudo, saj je bil euro temelj makroekonomske stabilnosti.
The crisis therefore showed that when the coordination of Union policies is strengthened and rendered effective, it can deliver significant results.
Kriza je torej pokazala, da kadar je usklajevanje politik Unije okrepljeno in učinkovito, lahko prinese znatne rezultate.
The crisis also underscored the close interdependence of the Member States’ economic and employment performance.
V krizi se je izpostavila tudi tesna medsebojna povezanost med gospodarsko uspešnostjoi in uspešnostjo zaposlovanja držav članic.
The Commission proposed to set up a new strategy for the next decade, known as ‘the Europe 2020 Strategy’, to enable the Union to emerge stronger from the crisis, and to turn its economy towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, accompanied by high level employment, productivity and social cohesion.
Komisija je predlagala, da se za naslednje desetletje oblikuje nova strategija, znana kot „strategija Evropa 2020“, ki bo Uniji omogočala, da bo po krizi še močnejša ter da bo svoje gospodarstvo usmerila v pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast, ki jo bo spremljala visoka stopnja zaposlenosti, produktivnosti in socialne kohezije.
As part of comprehensive ‘exit strategies’ for the economic crisis, Member States should carry out ambitious reforms to ensure macroeconomic stability, the promotion of more and better jobs and the sustainability of public finance, improve competitiveness and productivity, reduce macroeconomic imbalances and enhance labour market performance.
Države članice bi morale kot del celovitih „izhodnih strategij“ iz gospodarske krize izvesti ambiciozne programe reform, s katerimi bi zagotovile makroekonomsko stabilnost, spodbudile ustvarjanje več in boljših delovnih mest ter vzdržnost javnih financ, izboljšale konkurenčnost in produktivnost, zmanjšale makroekonomska neravnovesja ter povečale učinkovitost trga dela.
The withdrawal of the fiscal stimulus should be implemented and coordinated within the framework of the Stability and Growth Pact.
Ukinjanje fiskalnih spodbud bi bilo treba izvajati in usklajevati v okviru Pakta za stabilnost in rast.
Within the Europe 2020 strategy, Member States and the Union should implement reforms aimed at ‘smart growth’, i.e. growth driven by knowledge and innovation.
Države članice in Evropska unija bi morale v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 izvajati reforme, namenjene „pametni rasti“, tj. rasti, ki temelji na znanju in inovacijah.
Reforms should aim at improving the quality of education and ensuring access for all, as well as strengthening research, business performance and further improving the regulatory framework in order to promote innovation and knowledge transfer throughout the Union.
Reforme bi morale imeti za cilj izboljšati kakovost izobraževanja in zagotavljati njegovo dostopnost za vse, kot tudi okrepiti raziskovalne dejavnosti in povečati poslovne rezultate ter nadalje izboljšati regulativni okvir, da bi se spodbudile inovacije in prenos znanja po vsej Uniji.
Reforms should encourage entrepreneurship, the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and help to turn creative ideas into innovative products, services and processes that can create growth, quality and sustainable jobs, territorial, economic and social cohesion, and address more efficiently European and global societal challenges.
Reforme bi morale pospeševati podjetništvo, razvoj malih in srednjih podjetij ter pomagati pretvoriti ustvarjalne zamisli v inovativne proizvode, storitve in postopke, ki lahko ustvarijo rast, kakovostna in trajnostna delovna mesta, teritorialno, ekonomsko in socialno kohezijo, ter prispevati k učinkovitejšemu reševanju evropskih in svetovnih družbenih izzivov.
Making the most of information and communication technologies is essential in this context.
V tem okviru je bistveno čim bolje izkoristiti informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije.
The policies of the Union and of Member States, including their reform programmes, should aim at ‘sustainable growth’.
Unija in države članice bi se morale pri svojih politikah, vključno z njihovimi programi reform, usmeriti k „trajnostni rasti“.
Sustainable growth means building an energy and resource-efficient, sustainable and competitive economy, a fair distribution of the cost and benefits and exploiting Europe’s leadership in the race to develop new processes and technologies, including green technologies.
Trajnostna rast pomeni izgradnjo trajnostnega in konkurenčnega gospodarstva z učinkovito rabo energije in virov, pravično porazdelitev stroškov in koristi ter izkoriščanje vodilnega položaja Evrope v tekmi za razvoj novih procesov in tehnologij, vključno z zelenimi tehnologijami.
Member States and the Union should implement the necessary reforms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and use resources efficiently, which will also help to prevent environmental degradation and biodiversity loss.
Države članice in Unija bi morale z izvajanjem potrebnih reform zmanjšati emisije toplogrednih plinov in učinkovito uporabljati vire, kar bo pripomoglo tudi k preprečevanju degradacije okolja in izgube biotske raznovrstnosti.
They should also improve the business environment, stimulate the creation of green jobs and help enterprises to modernise their industrial base.
Poleg tega bi morale izboljšati poslovno okolje, spodbujati ustvarjanje zelenih delovnih mest in podjetjem pomagati, da posodobijo svojo industrijsko osnovo.
The policies of the Union and Member States’ reform programmes should also aim at ‘inclusive growth’.
Politike programov reform Unije in držav članic bi bilo treba usmeriti tudi k „vključujoči rasti“.
Inclusive growth means building a cohesive society in which people are empowered to anticipate and manage change and consequently to actively participate in society and the economy.
Vključujoča rast pomeni ustvarjanje bolj povezane družbe, v kateri bi ljudje znali predvidevati spremembe in jih obvladovati ter posledično dejavno sodelovali v družbi in gospodarstvu.
Member States’ reforms should therefore ensure access and opportunities for all throughout their lifecycle, thus reducing poverty and social exclusion through removing barriers to labour market participation, especially for women, older workers, young people, people with disabilities and legal migrants.
Z reformami bi morale države članice torej zagotoviti, da bi imeli vsi ljudje dostop in priložnosti v vseh svojih življenjskih obdobjih, ter tako z odpravo ovir za udeležbo na trgu dela, zlasti za ženske, starejše delavce, mlade, invalide in zakonite priseljence, zmanjšati revščino in socialno izključenost.
They should also make sure that the benefits of economic growth reach all citizens and all regions and foster employment-enhancing growth, based on decent work.
Morale bi tudi zagotoviti, da bo gospodarska rast koristila vsem državljanom in vsem regijam, in pospeševati rast zaposlovanja, ki temelji na dostojnem delu.