natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, this designation should be entered in the register.
Ker Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006, je treba navedeno imena registrirati.
Done at Brussels, 14 January 2010.
V Bruslju, 14. januarja 2010
OJ C 106, 8.5.2009, p. 27.
UL C 106, 8.5.2009, str. 27.
Skilandis (TSG)
Skilandis (ZTP)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 30/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 30/2010
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [PESCA di Verona (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Pesca di Verona (ZGO))
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘PESCA di Verona’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Italije za registracijo imena „Pesca di Verona“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
OJ C 130, 9.6.2009, p. 12.
UL C 130, 9.6.2009, str. 12.
Class 1.6.
Razred 1.6
PESCA di Verona (PGI)
Pesca di Verona (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 31/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 31/2010
entering a designation in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Idrijski žlikrofi (TSG)]
o registraciji imena v register zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti (Idrijski žlikrofi (ZTP))
In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, and pursuant to Article 19(3) of the same Regulation, the application submitted by Slovenia to enter the designation ‘Idrijski žlikrofi’ in the register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 8(2) in členom 19(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006 je bila vloga Slovenije za registracijo imena „Idrijski žlikrofi“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The application also requested protection under Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006.
Vloga vsebuje tudi zaprosilo za zaščito v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2006.
That protection should be granted to the name ‘Idrijski žlikrofi’ in so far as, in the absence of objections, it could not be demonstrated that the name is used in a lawful, renowned and economically significant manner for similar agricultural products or foodstuffs,
Navedeno zaščito imena „Idrijski žlikrofi“ je treba odobriti, v kolikor ni nobenega ugovora in če ni mogoče dokazati, da se ime na zakonit, splošno znan in gospodarsko pomemben način uporablja za podobne kmetijske proizvode in živila –
OJ C 104, 6.5.2009, p. 11.
UL C 104, 6.5.2009, str. 11.
Pasta, whether or not cooked or stuffed
Kuhane ali polnjene testenine
Idrijski žlikrofi (TSG)
Idrijski žlikrofi (ZTP)
The use of the designation is reserved.
Uporaba imena je pridržana.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 32/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 32/2010
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Jihočeská Zlatá Niva (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Jihočeská Zlatá Niva (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Czech Republic’s application to register the name ‘Jihočeská Zlatá Niva’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 6(2) in členom 17(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Češke za registracijo imena „Jihočeská Zlatá Niva“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
In the light of the information provided by Slovakia, the Commission cannot conclude that the registration of the name ‘Jihočeská Zlatá Niva’ would be contrary to Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Slovaška, Komisija ne more skleniti, da bi bila registracija imena „Jihočeská Zlatá Niva“ v nasprotju s členom 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
While the objector may have shown evidence that the name ‘Jihočeská Zlatá Niva’ can be associated with a name ‘Niva’, no evidence has been provided of the degree of distinctiveness the trademark acquired due to its reputation, renown and the length of time it was used.
Čeprav je vlagateljica ugovora dokazala, da je ime „Jihočeská Zlatá Niva“ mogoče povezati z imenom „Niva“, ni predložila dokazov o stopnji prepoznavnosti, ki jo je blagovna znamka pridobila zaradi svojega slovesa, ugleda in časa, v katerem se je uporabljala.
Therefore, on the basis of the information available, it has not been shown that the registration of ‘Jihočeská Zlatá Niva’ would be liable to mislead consumers as to the true identity of the product.
Razpoložljive informacije torej ne kažejo, da bi registracija imena „Jihočeská Zlatá Niva“ zavajala potrošnika glede resnične identitete proizvoda.
No evidence has been presented which would allow the Commission to conclude that having regard to the fair and traditional usage and the actual likelihood of confusion, registration of the name ‘Jihočeská Zlatá Niva’ as a protected geographical indication would run counter to the provisions laid down in Article 7.
Na podlagi dokazov, ki so bili predloženi, Komisija ne more priti do zaključka, da bi bila ob upoštevanju poštene tradicionalne prakse in dejanske verjetnosti zamenjav registracija imena „Jihočeská Zlatá Niva“ kot zaščitene označbe porekla v nasprotju z določbami člena 7.
Furthermore, according to the information available to the Commission, the exclusive right of the proprietor of the said trade marks would not entitle him to prohibit a third party from using, in the course of trade and in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters, an indication concerning geographical origin pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade [3].
Poleg tega v skladu z informacijami, ki jih ima na voljo Komisija, izključna pravica lastniku blagovne znamke ne daje pravice, da med trgovanjem in v skladu z dobrimi poslovnimi običaji v industrijskih in trgovinskih zadevah tretji strani prepove uporabo označbe geografskega porekla v skladu s členom 6 Direktive 2008/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2008 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami [3].
In the light of the above, the name ‘Jihočeská Zlatá Niva’ should be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’.
Glede na to je treba ime „Jihočeská Zlatá Niva“ vpisati v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb“.
OJ C 249, 24.10.2007, p. 31.
UL C 249, 24.10.2007, str. 31.
Jihočeská Zlatá Niva (PGI)
Jihočeská Zlatá Niva (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 33/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 33/2010
For the classification of footwear with uppers consisting of two or more materials, in application of Note 4 (a) together with Additional note 1 to Chapter 64 of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, the second sentence of Additional note 1 to Chapter 64 should be clarified by stating how to verify whether given materials have the characteristics of an upper.
Za uvrstitev obutve z zgornjim delom iz dveh ali več materialov ob uporabi opombe 4(a) skupaj z dodatno opombo 1 k poglavju 64 kombinirane nomenklature, priložene Uredbi (EGS) št. 2658/87, je treba drugi stavek dodatne opombe 1 k poglavju 64 pojasniti z navedbo o načinu preverjanja, ali imajo dani materiali značilnosti zgornjega dela.
In its judgment in case C-165/07, Skatteministeriet v Ecco Sko A/S [2], the Court of Justice of the European Union has introduced a ‘walking test’ for the purpose of that verification.
Sodišče Evropske unije je v sodbi v zadevi C-165/07, Skatteministeriet proti Ecco Sko A/S [2], za tako preverjanje uvedlo „test s hojo“.
The test requires verification whether the materials of the upper provide sufficient support for the foot to enable the wearer to walk in the footwear.
S testom se preveri, ali materiali zgornjega dela zagotavljajo zadostno oporo stopalu, da lahko uporabnik uporablja obutev za hojo.
It is therefore appropriate to specify in Additional note 1 to Chapter 64 that for materials to have the characteristics of an upper, they must support the foot sufficiently to enable the wearer to walk in the footwear.
Zato je primerno v dodatni opombi 1 k poglavju 64 določiti, da morajo materiali, da bi imeli značilnosti zgornjega dela, zagotavljati zadostno oporo stopalu, da lahko uporabnik uporablja obutev za hojo.
In its judgment the Court does not specify whether the ‘walking test’ is to be carried out with or without the fastening straps.
Sodišče v sodbi ni določilo, ali se „test s hojo“ opravi s trakovi za pričvrstitev ali brez njih.
The Court leaves it to the national referring court to make the necessary findings.
Sodišče prepušča potrebno ugotovitev nacionalnim predložitvenim sodiščem.
The fact that it depends on the way in which the leather is removed, whether the fastening straps stay in place or not, may lead to divergent interpretations of the judgment.
Dejstvo, da je od načina odstranitve usnja odvisno, ali trakovi za pričvrstitev ostanejo nameščeni ali ne, lahko privede do različnih razlag sodbe.
In order to obtain uniform interpretation as far as the fastening systems are concerned, it is necessary to specify in Additional note 1 to Chapter 64 that fastening systems have to stay in place during the test.
Za enotno razlago sistemov pričvrstitve je treba v dodatni opombi 1 k poglavju 64 določiti, da morajo sistemi pričvrstitve med testom ostati nameščeni.
Otherwise, in the case of footwear that requires a fastening system, for example laces, to function, the walking test would fail with any material, because the wearer could never walk with it lacking its fastening system.
V nasprotnem primeru test s hojo za obutev, ki za nošnjo zahteva sistem pričvrstitve, na primer vezalke, ne bi uspel z nobenimi materiali, saj uporabnik ne bi mogel nikoli hoditi brez sistema pričvrstitve.
In Additional note 1 to Chapter 64 of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, the second sentence of the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
V dodatni opombi 1 k poglavju 64 kombinirane nomenklature, priložene Uredbi (EGS) št. 2658/87, se drugi stavek prvega odstavka nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘After the removal of reinforcements, the visible material must have the characteristics of an upper and not lining, supporting the foot sufficiently to enable the wearer, with the original fastening systems in place, to walk in the footwear.’
„Po odstranitvi ojačitev mora imeti material, ki se pokaže, značilnosti zgornjega dela in ne podloge ter zagotavljati stopalu zadostno oporo, da je obutev z nameščenimi prvotnimi pričvrstitvami uporabna za hojo.“
ECR, p. I-4037.
ZOdl. 2008, str. I-4037.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 34/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 34/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 January 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 15. januarja 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 35/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 35/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 23/2010 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 23/2010 [4].
OJ L 8, 13.1.2010, p. 7.
UL L 8, 13.1.2010, str. 7.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 15 January 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 15. januarja 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 36/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 36/2010
on Community models for train driving licences, complementary certificates, certified copies of complementary certificates and application forms for train driving licences, under Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and the Council
o vzorcih dovoljenj Skupnosti za strojevodje, dopolnilnih spričeval, overjenih kopij dopolnilnih spričeval in obrazcev vlog za dovoljenja za strojevodje v skladu z Direktivo 2007/59/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(text with EEA relevance)
(besedilo velja za EGP)
Having regard to Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the certification of train drivers operating locomotives and trains on the railway system in the Community [1], and in particular Article 4(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2007/59/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o izdaji spričeval strojevodjem, ki upravljajo lokomotive in vlake na železniškem omrežju Skupnosti [1], ter zlasti člena 4(4) Direktive,
Having regard to the recommendation of the European Railway Agency No ERA/REC/SAF/04-2008 of 19 December 2008 on harmonised formats for train driving licences, complementary certificates, and certified copies of the complementary certificates for train drivers, in conformity with Directive 2007/59/EC and the recommendation of the European Railway Agency No ERA/REC/SAF/06-2008 of 19 December 2008 on the use of a harmonised model for application form for train driving licences,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Evropske železniške agencije št. ERA/REC/SAF/04-2008 z dne 19. decembra 2008 o usklajenih oblikah dovoljenj za strojevodje, dopolnilnih spričeval in overjenih kopij dopolnilnih spričeval za strojevodje v skladu z Direktivo 2007/59/ES ter priporočila Evropske železniške agencije št. ERA/REC/SAF/06-2008 z dne 19. decembra 2008 o uporabi usklajenega vzorca obrazca vloge za dovoljenje za strojevodjo,
Directive 2007/59/EC provides that all train drivers shall have the necessary fitness and qualifications to drive trains and shall hold the following documents: a licence demonstrating that the driver satisfies minimum conditions as regards medical requirements, basic education and general professional skills and one or more certificates indicating the infrastructures on which the holder is authorised to drive and indicating the rolling stock which the holder is authorised to drive.
Direktiva 2007/59/ES določa, da mora imeti vsak strojevodja potrebne sposobnosti in kvalifikacije za upravljanje vlakov ter naslednje dokumente: dovoljenje, iz katerega je razvidno, da strojevodja izpolnjuje minimalne pogoje glede zdravstvenih zahtev, osnovne izobrazbe in splošne strokovne usposobljenosti, ter eno ali več spričeval, v katerih je navedeno, po kateri infrastrukturi imetnik spričevala lahko vozi in katera vozna sredstva lahko upravlja.
The Member States’ laws on the certification conditions for train drivers differ considerably.
Zakonodaje držav članic se na področju izdaje spričeval strojevodjem precej razlikujejo.
Harmonised models for the certification of train drivers should therefore be adopted to support the implementation of the relevant Community rules.
Zato je treba sprejeti usklajene vzorce spričeval za strojevodje, da se prispeva k izvajanju ustreznih pravil Skupnosti.
The aim of harmonising licences and complementary certificates is primarily to make it easier for train drivers to move from one Member State to another, but also to make it easier for them to move from one railway undertaking to another, and generally to have the licences and certificates recognised by all railway sector stakeholders.
Cilj usklajevanja dovoljenj in dopolnilnih spričeval je predvsem olajšati mobilnost strojevodij med državami članicami, poleg tega pa tudi med različnimi prevozniki v železniškem prometu, ter na splošno priznavanje dovoljenj in spričeval s strani vseh udeležencev v železniškem sektorju.
To this end, it is essential that the provisions set minimum requirements which applicants should meet to obtain a licence or harmonised complementary certificate.
Zato je bistvenega pomena, da se v določbah določijo minimalne zahteve, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati prosilci za pridobitev dovoljenja oziroma usklajenega dopolnilnega spričevala.
In order to guarantee the necessary uniformity and transparency, Member States should adopt a harmonised model for train driving licences, whilst railway undertakings and infrastructure managers should issue harmonised complementary certificates.
Države članice morajo za zagotovitev potrebne enotnosti in preglednosti sprejeti usklajen vzorec dovoljenja za strojevodje, medtem ko morajo prevozniki v železniškem prometu in upravljavci železniške infrastrukture izdajati usklajena dopolnilna spričevala.
To railway undertakings and infrastructure managers employing or contracting drivers, and especially to railway undertakings operating international services, it is important that the format of complementary certificates should be the same in different Member States; therefore it should be harmonised in order to attest drivers’ compliance with certain minimum conditions, professional qualifications and linguistic knowledge.
Za prevoznike v železniškem prometu in upravljavce železniške infrastrukture, ki redno ali pogodbeno zaposlujejo strojevodje, ter zlasti za prevoznike v železniškem prometu, ki opravljajo prevozne storitve, je pomembno, da je oblika dopolnilnih spričeval v različnih državah članicah enaka; zato jo je treba uskladiti zaradi potrditve izpolnjevanja določenih minimalnih pogojev, strokovne usposobljenosti in jezikovnega znanja strojevodij.
Annex I(2)(g) to Directive 2007/59/EC states that the Commission shall decide the codes for additional information or medical restriction to be included in the train driving licences.
Priloga I(2)(g) k Direktivi 2007/59/ES navaja, da mora Komisija določiti kode za dodatne informacije ali zdravstveno pogojene omejitve uporabe, ki jih je treba vključiti v dovoljenja za strojevodje.
Each train driving licence should be granted by the Member States with a unique number; this number should also make it easier to record the licence in the national register of train driving licences, to be set up in accordance with Article 22(1)(a) of Directive 2007/59/EC.
Države članice morajo vsako dovoljenje za strojevodjo izdati z edinstveno številko; ta številka bo olajšala evidentiranje dovoljenja v nacionalnem registru dovoljenj za strojevodje, ki se bo vzpostavil v skladu s členom 22(1)(a) Direktive 2007/59/ES.
All of the information contained in train driving licences, complementary certificates and registers thereof should be used by the safety authorities to facilitate evaluation of the staff certification process provided for in Articles 10 and 11 of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive) [2] and to speed up the issuing of the safety certificates provided for in those Articles.
Varnostni organi morajo uporabljati vse informacije, ki jih vsebujejo dovoljenja za strojevodje, dopolnilna spričevala in registri o njih, da bi se olajšal postopek ocenjevanja izdaje spričeval osebju, določen v členih 10 in 11 Direktive 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o varnosti na železnicah Skupnosti ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 95/18/ES o izdaji licence prevoznikom v železniškem prometu [2] in Direktive 2001/14/ES o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti, naložitvi uporabnin za uporabo železniške infrastrukture in podeljevanju varnostnega spričevala, ter pospešila izdaja varnostnih spričeval, določenih v navedenih členih.
The employment of train drivers certified in accordance with Directive 2007/59/EC should not exonerate railway undertakings and infrastructure managers from their obligation to set up a system of monitoring and internal control of the competence and conduct of their train drivers pursuant to Article 9 of and Annex III to Directive 2004/49/EC and should form part of that system.
Zaposlitev strojevodij, ki so pridobili spričevalo v skladu z Direktivo 2007/59/ES, prevoznikov v železniškem prometu in upravljavcev železniške infrastrukture ne odvezuje obveznosti, da v skladu s členom 9 in Prilogo III k Direktivi 2004/49/ES vzpostavijo sistem spremljanja in interne kontrole usposobljenosti in ravnanja njihovih strojevodij; morala bi biti del tega sistema.
The harmonised complementary certificate should not relieve railway undertakings and infrastructure managers of their responsibility for the safe operation of their part of the railway system, and, in particular, the training of their staff.
Usklajeno dopolnilno spričevalo prav tako prevoznikov v železniškem prometu ali upravljavcev železniške infrastrukture ne odvezuje njihove odgovornosti za varno delovanje na svojem delu železniškega sistema in še zlasti usposabljanja svojega osebja.
Article 7(1) of Directive 2007/59/EC states that a licence shall be valid throughout the territory of the Community and Article 4(4) of that Directive requires a Community model to be set out.
V členu 7(1) Direktive 2007/59/ES je navedeno, da morajo biti dovoljenja veljavna na celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti, člen 4(4) navedene direktive pa zahteva, da se oblikuje vzorec Skupnosti.
A harmonised application form for licences would therefore facilitate the work of the competent authorities in the Member States that have to collect information in order to deliver the licence.
Usklajen obrazec vloge za dovoljenja bi tako olajšal delo pristojnih organov v državah članicah, ki morajo zbrati podatke za izdajo dovoljenja.
Article 14(1) of Directive 2007/59/EC requires competent authorities in the Member States to publish the procedure to be followed for obtaining a licence.
Člen 14(1) Direktive 2007/59/ES zahteva, da pristojni organi v državah članicah objavijo postopek za pridobitev dovoljenja.
When establishing such procedures, competent authorities should include provisions for the use of the harmonised application form.
Pri vzpostavljanju takih postopkov morajo pristojni organi vključiti določbe o uporabi usklajenega obrazca vloge.
The harmonised application form may be used to provide adequate information on the national enforcement provisions for Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and of the free movement of such data [3] on the protection of individuals when processing personal data.
Usklajen obrazec vloge se lahko uporablja za zagotovitev ustreznih informacij o nacionalnih izvedbenih določbah za Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [3] v zvezi z varstvom posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov.
Competent authorities may use it to obtain authorisation to process data on applicants for or holders of a train driving licence, whenever it is required thereby.
Pristojni organi ga lahko uporabljajo za pridobitev dovoljenja za obdelavo podatkov o prosilcih ali imetnikih dovoljenj za strojevodje, kadar koli se to zahteva.
The adoption of a harmonised application form has a very limited economic impact and constitutes a very slight administrative burden, given the possibility to choose between a printout document and an IT interface using a common application.
Sprejetje usklajenega obrazca vloge ima zelo omejen gospodarski učinek in predstavlja zelo majhno upravno breme ob upoštevanju možnosti izbire med natisnjenim dokumentom in vmesnikom IT, pri čemer se uporablja enotna aplikacija.
In accordance with Article 36(3) of Directive 2007/59/EC, the latter does not apply to Cyprus and Malta.
V skladu s členom 36(3) Direktive 2007/59/ES zadnje ne velja za Ciper in Malto.
Therefore this Regulation should not be applicable in Cyprus and Malta as long as no railway system is established within the territory of these Member States.
Zato ta uredba ne velja na Cipru in Malti, dokler na ozemlju teh dveh držav članic ne bo vzpostavljen železniški sistem.