natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
After having analysed the sales conditions on the domestic market and in particular the sales price patterns, the investigation showed that the applicant did not demonstrate, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, a consistent and distinct difference in functions and prices for the different levels of trade in the domestic market of the exporting country.
Po analizi prodajnih pogojev na domačem trgu in zlasti vzorcev prodajne cene je preiskava pokazala, da vložnik ni dokazal doslednih in jasnih razlik med funkcijami in cenami različnih ravni trgovine na domačem trgu države izvoznice v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore no adjustment was taken into account.
Zato ni bila upoštevana nobena prilagoditev.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, and taking into account that there were only three orders at virtually the same point in time during the RIP and that the price of the raw material, which accounts for most of the cost of manufacturing, varied significantly during the RIP, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison on a transaction to transaction basis between the normal value and the export price.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe ter ob upoštevanju, da so bila med OPP izdana le tri naročila skoraj istočasno in da je cena surovine, ki predstavlja večino stroškov proizvodnje, med OPP znatno nihala, je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave posameznih transakcij med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno.
The comparison showed the existence of dumping at a level of 49,9 %, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union-frontier price.
Primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga v višini 49,9 %, izraženega v odstotku cene CIF meja Unije.
In addition, the investigation confirmed that the export prices of the applicant to other third countries with important quantities are significantly lower than those to the European Union, suggesting the existence of dumping on third markets.
Poleg tega je bilo s preiskavo potrjeno, da so bile izvozne cene vložnika za druge tretje države z velikimi količinami znatno nižje kot cene za Evropsko unijo, kar nakazuje na obstoj dampinga na trgih tretjih držav.
In the light of the results of the investigation, it is considered that a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margin found.
Glede na rezultate preiskave se šteje, da je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na ravni ugotovljene dampinške stopnje.
The dumping margin, established for the RIP, of 49,9 % is below the country-wide injury elimination level of 75 % which was established for Malaysia in the original investigation.
Stopnja dampinga, določena za OPP, in sicer v višini 49,9 %, je pod stopnjo odprave škode za celotno državo v višini 75 %, ki je bila določena za Malezijo v prvotni preiskavi.
It is therefore proposed that a duty which is based on the dumping margin of 49,9 % be imposed and that Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 be accordingly amended.
Zato se predlaga, da se uvede dajatev, ki temelji na stopnji dampinga v višini 49,9 %, in da se Uredba (ES) št. 1001/2008 ustrezno spremeni.
In the light of the above findings, the anti-dumping duty applicable to the applicant shall be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been made subject to registration pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 692/2009.
Glede na navedene ugotovitve se protidampinška dajatev, ki velja za vložnika, retroaktivno obračuna za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, za katerega velja registracija v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 692/2009.
MONITORING CLAUSE AND POSSIBLE FURTHER REVIEW
KLAVZULA O SPREMLJANJU IN MOREBITEN NADALJNJI PREGLED
It should be noted that the companies concerned have a complex system of distribution which also involves importing the product concerned from other countries under measures.
Treba je opozoriti, da imajo zadevne družbe zapleten sistem distribucije, ki vključuje tudi uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz drugih držav, za katere veljajo ukrepi.
In addition, there is a certain risk of duty avoidance due to the high difference in the duty rates between the different exporting companies inside Malaysia.
Poleg tega je prisotno tudi določeno tveganje za izogibanje plačilu dajatve zaradi velike razlike v stopnji dajatve med različnimi izvoznimi družbami v Maleziji.
Therefore, special measures are needed to ensure the proper application of the anti-dumping duties.
Zato je treba uvesti posebne ukrepe, da se zagotovi pravilna uporaba protidampinških dajatev.
These special measures consist of the presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Ti posebni ukrepi zajemajo predložitev veljavne trgovinske fakture carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladna z zahtevami iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Imports not accompanied by such an invoice shall be made subject to the residual anti-dumping duty applicable to all other exporters.
Za uvoz, ki ga ne spremlja takšna faktura, velja preostala protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za vse druge izvoznike.
Furthermore, the Council notes that the Commission has informed it that it will invite the company concerned to submit regular reports to the Commission in order to ensure proper follow up of their sales of the product concerned to the Union and the price and other conditions related thereto, as well as information regarding developments in the company’s domestic sales prices.
Poleg tega Svet opozarja, da ga je Komisija obvestila o tem, da bo zadevno družbo pozvala k rednemu predlaganju poročil Komisiji, da se zagotovi pravilno spremljanje njihove prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Unijo ter cene in drugih pogojev, ki so s tem povezani, in tudi informacij glede razvoja prodajnih cen družbe na domačem trgu.
The Council notes that, in particular, if such reports are not submitted, or where such reports disclose that measures may not be adequate to eliminate the effects of injurious dumping, it may be necessary to initiate an interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Svet tudi opozarja, da bo morebiti treba začeti vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, zlasti v primerih, kadar takšna poročila niso predložena ali kadar takšna poročila razkrivajo, da ukrepi niso primerni za odpravljanje posledic škodljivega dampinga.
The Council also notes that the Commission has the possibility to ex officio initiate an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, in particular once one year has passed after the entry into force of this Regulation (although a previous review may also be warranted).
Svet prav tako opozarja na možnost Komisije, da v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe začne vmesni pregled po uradni dolžnosti, zlasti po preteku enega leta od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe, čeprav se lahko odobri tudi prejšnji pregled.
It is noted that at this point in time, the Commission expects that it will be appropriate to conduct such a review after one year given the circumstances of this case.
Opozarja se, da Komisija trenutno pričakuje, da bo zaradi okoliščin tega primera ustrezno opraviti takšen pregled čez eno leto.
In this context, it is important to note that the duty established for the company concerned by this Regulation is based on only a limited number of orders.
Pri tem je pomembno opozoriti, da stopnja dajatve, določena v tej uredbi za zadevno družbo, temelji le na omejenem številu naročil.
The parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose on imports of tube and pipe fittings from the applicant an amended definitive anti-dumping duty and to levy this duty retroactively on imports made subject to registration.
Zadevne stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala uvesti spremenjena dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz pribora (fitingov) za cevi vložnika in retroaktivno obračunati to dajatev za uvoz, za katerega velja registracija.
Their comments were considered and taken into account, where appropriate.
Njihove pripombe so bile preučene in upoštevane, kjer je bilo to primerno.
This review does not affect the date on which the measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation,
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe ta pregled ne vpliva na datum prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1001/2008 –
In Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008, the following shall be inserted into the table under producers in Malaysia:
V členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1001/2008 se v preglednico pri proizvajalcih v Maleziji, vstavi naslednje:
The duty hereby imposed shall also be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been registered pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 692/2009.
Uvedena protidampinška dajatev se retroaktivno obračuna za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki je bil registriran v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 692/2009.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports of the product concerned originating in Malaysia produced by Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd.
Carinskim organom je naročeno, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Malezije, ki ga proizvaja družba Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd.
In Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 the following paragraph shall be added:
V členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1001/2008 se doda naslednji odstavek:
The application of the individual duty rates specified for Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd shall be conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex.
Uporaba individualnih stopenj dajatve, določenih za družbo Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd, je pogojena s predložitvijo veljavne trgovinske fakture carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladna z zahtevami iz Priloge.
If no such invoice is presented, the duty rate applicable to all other companies shall apply.’
Če takšna faktura ni predložena, se uporablja stopnja dajatve, ki velja za vse druge družbe.“
The addition of the above paragraph in Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 implies that Article 1(3) of that Regulation is to be renumbered as Article 1(4).
Z dodatkom zgornjega odstavka v Uredbo (ES) št. 1001/2008 se člen 1(3) navedene uredbe preštevilči v člen 1(4).
In Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008, the following Annex shall be added:
V Uredbi (ES) št. 1001/2008 se doda naslednja Priloga:
OJ L 199, 31.7.2009, p. 9.
UL L 199, 31.7.2009, str. 9.
ufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in (country concerned).
jema ta trgovinska faktura, proizvedla (ime in naslov družbe) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) v (zadevna država).
I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct and that the invoiced price is final and will not be compensated, in part or in whole, via any practice.
Izjavljam, da so informacije iz te fakture popolne in pravilne ter da je fakturirana cena končna in se ne bo ne deloma ne popolnoma izravnala z nobeno prakso.
Date and signature”.’.
Datum in podpis‘.“.
Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 364/2010
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 364/2010
amending Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain finished polyester filament fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1487/2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih dokončanih tkanin iz poliestrskih filamentov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
Having regard to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 [2],
ob upoštevanju člena 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1487/2005 [2],
By Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005, the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the European Union of woven fabrics of synthetic filament yarn containing 85 % or more by weight of textured and/or non-textured polyester filament, dyed (including dyed white) or printed, originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex54075100, 54075200, 54075400, ex54076110, 54076130, 54076190, ex54076910 and ex54076990 (‘the product concerned’).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1487/2005 je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz v Evropsko unijo tkanin iz preje iz sintetičnih filamentov, ki vsebujejo 85 % ali več mas. % teksturiranih in/ali neteksturiranih poliestrskih filamentov, barvanih (vključno z beljenimi) ali potiskanih, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščenih pod oznake KN ex54075100, 54075200, 54075400, ex54076110, 54076130, 54076190, ex54076910 in ex54076990 („zadevni izdelek“).
The sampled companies were attributed the individual duty rates established during the investigation.
Vzorčenim družbam so bile dodeljene individualne stopnje dajatve, ki so bile ugotovljene med preiskavo.
The cooperating non-sampled companies which were granted market economy treatment (MET), in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(7)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 [3], were attributed the weighted average duty of 14,1 % which was established for the sampled companies which were granted MET.
Za sodelujoče nevzorčene družbe, ki jim je bila odobrena tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“) v skladu z določbami člena 2(7)(c) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 [3], se uporablja tehtano povprečje dajatve v višini 14,1 %, ki je bilo določeno za vzorčene družbe z odobreno TGO.
The cooperating non-sampled companies which were granted individual treatment (IT), in accordance with the provisions of Article 9(5) of the same Regulation, received the weighted average duty of 37,1 % established for the sampled companies that were granted IT.
Za sodelujoče nevzorčene družbe, ki jim je bila odobrena individualna obravnava („IO“) v skladu z določbami člena 9(5) iste uredbe, se uporablja tehtano povprečje dajatve v višini 37,1 %, določeno za vzorčene družbe, ki jim je bila odobrena IO.
A countrywide duty of 56,2 % was imposed on all other companies.
Za vse druge družbe je bila uvedena dajatev na ravni države v višini 56,2 %.
Following an anti-absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1087/2007 [4] increased the countrywide duty to 74,8 %.
Po ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1087/2007 [4] povečal dajatev na ravni države na 74,8 %.
In addition, Chinese exporting producers with individual duty rates that did not cooperate in the reinvestigation were attributed higher anti-dumping duties in accordance with the provisions of Article 12(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
Poleg tega so bile kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom z individualnimi stopnjami dajatve, ki niso sodelovali v ponovni preiskavi, dodeljene višje protidampinške dajatve v skladu z določbami člena 12(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96.
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 gives the possibility to Chinese exporting producers which meet the four criteria set out in that Article to be granted the same treatment as the one set out in recital 3 for the cooperating companies not included in the sample (‘New Exporting Producer Treatment’ or ‘NEPT’).
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1487/2005 kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so izpolnili štiri merila iz navedenega člena, omogoča, da se jih obravnava enako kot družbe iz uvodne izjave 3 o sodelujočih družbah, ki niso vključene v vzorec („status novega proizvajalca izvoznika“ ali „SNPI“).
NEW EXPORTING PRODUCERS’ REQUEST
ZAHTEVA NOVIH PROIZVAJALCEV IZVOZNIKOV
One group of companies consisting of two related companies, namely AlbaChiara Printing and Dyeing (Jiaxing) Co. Ltd, and Jiaxing E. Boselli Textile Trading Co. Ltd (‘the applicant’), requested to be granted NEPT.
Skupina družb, ki jo sestavljata dve povezani družbi, namreč AlbaChiara Printing and Dyeing (Jiaxing) Co. Ltd. in Jiaxing E. Boselli Textile Trading Co. Ltd. („vložnik“), je zahtevala dodelitev SNPI.
An examination has been carried out to determine whether the applicant fulfils the criteria for being granted NEPT as set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005, by verifying that:
Za ugotovitev, ali vložnik izpolnjuje merila za odobritev SNPI iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1487/2005, je bilo s preiskavo preverjeno, da:
it did not export the product concerned to the European Union during the investigation period on which the measures are based (1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004) (‘the first criterion’),
v obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi (od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004), v Evropsko unijo ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka („prvo merilo“);
it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the People’s Republic of China which are subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by that Regulation (‘the second criterion’),
ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, za katerega veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z navedeno uredbo („drugo merilo“);
it has actually exported to the European Union the product concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity of the product concerned to the European Union (‘the third criterion’),
je dejansko izvažal zadevni izdelek v Evropsko unijo po obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi, ali je sklenil nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost o izvozu velike količine zadevnega izdelka v Evropsko unijo („tretje merilo“);
it operates under market economy conditions defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or, alternatively, that it fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation (‘the fourth criterion’).
deluje pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, opredeljenimi v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe ali izpolnjuje zahteve za individualno dajatev v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe („četrto merilo“).
Questionnaires were sent to the applicant asking it to supply evidence to demonstrate that it met the first, second and third criteria.
Vložniku so bili poslani vprašalniki, s katerimi je bil zaprošen, da predloži dokaze o izpolnjevanju prvega, drugega in tretjega merila.
Since the fourth criterion implies that the applicants submit a claim for MET and/or IT, the Commission sent MET and IT claim forms to the applicant.
Ker četrto merilo določa, da vložniki predložijo zahtevek za TGO in/ali IO, je Komisija vložniku poslala obrazce za zahtevka TGO in IO.
The applicant requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Vlagatelj je zahteval TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards [5] and are applied for all purposes;
podjetja imajo jasno določeno zbirko računovodskih evidenc, ki se pregledujejo neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi [5] in se uporabljajo v vse namene;
Exporting producers fulfilling the criteria mentioned in recital 7 may, pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005, be granted either the 14,1 % duty rate applicable to companies to which MET was granted in accordance with Article 2(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, or the weighted average duty rate of 37,1 % applicable to companies to which IT was granted in accordance with Article 9(5) of the same Regulation.
Proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki izpolnjujejo merila iz uvodne izjave 7, se lahko v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1487/2005 odobri stopnja dajatve v višini 14,1 %, ki se uporablja za družbe z odobreno TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96, ali tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 37,1 %, ki se uporablja za družbe z odobreno IO v skladu s členom 9(5) iste uredbe.
The European Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of determining whether the four criteria set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 had been fulfilled.
(12) Evropska komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za določitev izpolnjevanja štirih meril iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1487/2005.
The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to prove that it meets the four criteria mentioned in recital 7.
Vložnik je predložil zadostne dokaze o izpolnjevanju vseh štirih meril iz uvodne izjave 7.
The applicant in fact could prove that (i) it did not export the product concerned to the European Union during the period 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004, (ii) it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in the People’s Republic of China which are subject to the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005, (iii) it actually exported a significant quantity of the product concerned to the European Union starting from the year 2008, (iv) it fulfils all the requirements for MET and can therefore be granted an individual duty in accordance with Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik je dejansko lahko dokazal, da (i) v obdobju od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 v Evropsko unijo ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka, (ii) ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, za katerega veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1487/2005, (iii) je od leta 2008 v Evropsko unijo dejansko izvažal znatno količino zadevnega izdelka, (iv) izpolnjuje vse zahteve za TGO in se mu zato lahko odobri individualna dajatev v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the applicant could be granted the weighted average duty rate applicable to cooperating companies not included in the sample which have been granted MET (i.e. 14,1 %) in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005, and should be added to the list of exporting producers in Article 1(2) of that Regulation.
Zato se vložniku lahko odobri tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, katerim je odobren TGO (tj. 14,1 %), v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1487/2005, in ga je treba dodati na seznam proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz člena 1(2) navedene uredbe.
In consideration of the findings of the investigation as indicated in recital 13, it is concluded that the companies AlbaChiara Printing and Dyeing (Jiaxing) Co. Ltd, and Jiaxing E. Boselli Textile Trading Co. Ltd should be added to the list of individual companies mentioned under Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 with a duty rate of 14,1 %.
Glede na ugotovitve preiskave iz uvodne izjave 13 se ugotavlja, da je treba družbi AlbaChiara Printing and Dyeing (Jiaxing) Co. Ltd. in Jiaxing E. Boselli Textile Trading Co. Ltd. dodati na seznam posameznih družb s stopnjo dajatve 14,1 % iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1487/2005.
The applicant and the Union industry have been informed of the findings of the investigation and have had the opportunity to submit their comments.
Vložnik in industrija Unije sta bila seznanjena z ugotovitvami preiskave in sta imela možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
No additional information was brought forward permitting to lead to any different conclusion for the applicant,
Vložnik ni posredoval dodatnih informacij, ki bi lahko privedle do kakršnih koli drugačnih ugotovitev –
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 shall be amended by adding the following companies in the table of companies with individual duty rates:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1487/2005 se spremeni tako, da se v preglednico družb z individualnimi stopnjami dajatve dodata naslednji družbi: