natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If a consortium submitting a proposal does not attend the hearing, but replies in written form to the questions which were sent, their written responses will be taken into account.
Če se konzorcij, ki je vložil predlog, zaslišanja ne udeleži, temveč na postavljena poslana vprašanja odgovori v pisni obliki, se njihovi pisni odgovori upoštevajo.
If a consortium both fails to reply to the questions and also to attend the hearing, the panel will arrive at a final score and comments for the proposal on the basis of the originally submitted material only.
Če se konzorcij niti ne udeleži zaslišanja niti v pisni obliki ne odgovori na vprašanja, odbor končno oceno in mnenja o predlogu oblikuje izključno na podlagi prvotno vloženega gradiva.
In some circumstances a hearing may be conducted entirely through a written procedure.
V nekaterih okoliščinah zaslišanje lahko poteka izključno na podlagi pisnega postopka.
Hearings may alternatively be organised via telephone, or by using video-conference facilities.
Po možnosti se lahko zaslišanja organizirajo tudi po telefonu ali z uporabo videokonference.
Specific arrangements for hearings will be described in the Guide for Applicants.
Posebne ureditve za zaslišanja bodo opisane v priročniku za vložnike.
Outcome of panel review
Rezultat pregleda v okviru odbora
The outcome of the panel review is a report recording, principally:
Rezultat pregleda v okviru odbora je poročilo, ki zlasti navaja naslednje:
a list of proposals passing all thresholds, along with a final score for each proposal passing the thresholds and the panel recommendations for priority order,
seznam predlogov, ki so dosegli vse pragove, skupaj s končno oceno za vsak predlog, ki je dosegel prag, ter priporočili odbora o prednostnem vrstnem redu,
a list of evaluated proposals having failed one or more thresholds,
seznam ocenjenih predlogov, ki niso dosegli enega ali več pragov,
a list of any proposals having been found ineligible during the evaluation,
seznam predlogov, za katere je bilo med ocenjevanjem ugotovljeno, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev,
a record of the hearings (if applicable),
zapisnik o zaslišanjih (če je ustrezno),
a summary of any other recommendations of the panel.
povzetek vseh drugih priporočil odbora.
If the same panel has considered proposals submitted to various parts of a call (for example, different funding schemes, or different topics that have been allocated distinct indicative budgets in the work programme), the report may contain multiple lists accordingly.
Če je isti odbor obravnaval predloge, posredovane za različne dele razpisa (na primer, različne sheme financiranja ali različne teme, katerim so bili v delovnem programu dodeljeni ločeni okvirni proračuni), lahko poročilo vsebuje več pripadajočih seznamov.
The Evaluation Summary Reports agreed by the panel experts may include recommendations for further improvements to a proposal that is already highly rated.
Zbirna poročila o ocenjevanju, o katerih so se strokovnjaki odbora dogovorili, lahko vključujejo priporočila za nadaljnje izboljšave predloga, ki je že visoko ocenjen.
These recommendations will aim for a more efficient implementation of the proposed work, for example, by modifying details of the methodology, or by removing superfluous work packages.
Namen teh priporočil je učinkovitejše izvajanje predlagane dejavnosti, na primer s prilagoditvijo podrobnosti metodologije ali umikom nepotrebnega nabora del.
The experts will indicate the likely impact in effort and equipment, and may indicate the impact on budget, of any such changes.
Strokovnjaki navedejo verjeten vpliv vloženega napora in opreme ter vpliv takih sprememb na proračun.
The experts may also suggest a reduction in effort and/or budget without a change in content, if the reasons for such a reduction are well founded.
Strokovnjaki lahko predlagajo tudi zmanjšanje napora in/ali proračuna brez spremembe vsebine, če so razlogi za tako zmanjšanje dobro utemeljeni.
In duly justified cases, the panel may recommend a merging of proposals, or funding up to a certain milestone with the possibility to grant complementary funding following a subsequent call for proposal.
V zadostno upravičenih primerih odbor lahko predlaga združevanje predlogov ali financiranje do določene ciljne točke z možnostjo odobritve dopolnilnega financiranja po poznejšem razpisu za zbiranje predlogov.
If applicable, the experts will make a recommendation for the funding of projects requesting a higher level of reimbursement for security-related research and technological development activities, where this is justified by the development of capabilities in domains with very limited market size and a risk of “market failure” and for accelerated equipment development in response to new threats [30].
Če je ustrezno, strokovnjaki pripravijo priporočilo za financiranje projektov, ki zahtevajo višjo raven povračila za raziskave v zvezi z varnostjo in dejavnosti tehnološkega razvoja, kadar to upravičujeta razvoj zmogljivosti na področjih z zelo omejenim obsegom trga in tveganje ‚tržnega neuspeha‘, ter za pospešeni razvoj opreme kot odgovor na nove nevarnosti [30].
The panel report is signed by at least three panel experts, including the panel “rapporteur” (if an expert was so appointed), and the chairperson.
Poročilo odbora podpišejo vsaj trije strokovnjaki odbora, vključno s ‚poročevalcem‘ odbora (če je bil tako imenovan strokovnjak), in predsednik odbora.
The Commission sends electronically a letter (“initial information letter”) to the coordinator of each evaluated proposal.
Komisija v elektronski obliki pošlje dopis (‚prvotni informativni dopis‘) koordinatorju vsakega ocenjenega predloga.
The letter is accompanied by an ESR, except in the case of successful first stage applicants in a two-stage procedure, as described in Annex C. The letter and ESR may also be sent by paper.
Dopisu je priloženo zbirno poročilo o ocenjevanju, razen za vložnike, ki so uspešno končali prvo stopnjo v okviru dvostopenjskega postopka, kakor je opisan v Prilogi C. Dopis in zbirno poročilo o ocenjevanju se lahko pošljeta tudi v papirni obliki.
The aim is to give the applicants a prompt indication of how their proposals fared in the evaluation by experts.
Namen dopisa in poročila je čim prej obvestiti vložnike o tem, kako so strokovnjaki ocenili njihove predloge.
However, at this stage, the Commission cannot make a commitment as regards possible selection and funding.
Vendar na tej stopnji Komisija še ne more dati zagotovila o morebitni izbiri in financiranju.
The Guide for Applicants will indicate the expected date for the dispatch of these letters [31].
Priročnik za vložnike navaja predvideni datum odpreme teh dopisov [31].
The Commission will not change the ESRs that form part of the panel report, except if necessary to improve readability or, exceptionally, to remove any factual errors or inappropriate comments that may have escaped earlier proof-reading.
Komisija ne spreminja zbirnih poročil o ocenjevanju, ki so del poročila odbora, razen če je to potrebno zaradi izboljšanja razumljivosti ali, izjemoma, da se odpravijo dejanske napake ali neustrezne pripombe, ki so bile v prejšnjih branjih spregledane.
The scores will never be changed.
Spreminjanje ocen nikakor ni mogoče.
The ESR reflects the consensus reached by the experts, including the final review by the panel.
Zbirno poročilo o ocenjevanju odraža soglasje, ki so ga dosegli strokovnjaki, vključno s končnim pregledom, ki ga je opravil odbor.
It contains comments and scores on each criterion and an overall score, as well as providing overall comments when appropriate.
Vsebuje pripombe in ocene posameznih meril in skupno oceno ter podaja splošne pripombe, kadar je primerno.
The comments recorded must give sufficient and clear reasons for the scores and, if appropriate, any recommendations for modifications to the proposal should the proposal be retained for negotiation.
Zapisane pripombe morajo zadostno in jasno utemeljiti ocene in, če je ustrezno, podati priporočila za spremembe predloga, če se predlog zadrži za pogajanja.
In exceptional cases, possibilities for clustering or combination with other proposals may be indicated.
V izjemnih primerih se lahko navedejo možnosti združevanja ali povezovanja z drugimi predlogi.
For those proposals rejected after failing an evaluation threshold, the comments contained in the ESR may only be complete for those criteria examined up to the point when the threshold was failed.
Za tiste predloge, ki so bili zaradi nedoseganja ocenjevalnih pragov zavrnjeni, se lahko pripombe, vsebovane v zbirnem poročilu o ocenjevanju, podajo samo za tista merila, ki so bila pregledana do trenutka, ko predlog ni več dosegal zahtevanega praga.
Coordinators of proposals found to be ineligible will be informed of the grounds for such a decision.
Koordinatorji predlogov, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za ustreznost, bodo obveščeni o razlogih za sprejeto odločitev.
Coordinators of proposals rejected because of security considerations will be informed of the grounds for such a decision.
Koordinatorji predlogov, ki so bili zavrnjeni zaradi varnostnih vprašanj, bodo obveščeni o razlogih za sprejeto odločitev.
FINALISATION OF THE EVALUATION RESULTS
DOKONČNO IZOBLIKOVANJE REZULTATOV OCENJEVANJA
At this stage, the Commission staff review the results of the evaluation by experts, and make their own assessment of the proposals, in particular a review of the Union or Euratom financial contribution, based on the advice from these experts.
Na tej stopnji osebje Komisije pregleda rezultate ocenjevanja strokovnjakov in poda lastno oceno predlogov, zlasti pregled finančnega prispevka Unije ali Euratoma na podlagi nasveta teh strokovnjakov.
Funding decisions shall be made on the basis of this ranking [32].
Odločitve o financiranju se sprejmejo na podlagi tega razporeda [32].
The responsible department draws up the final list of proposals for possible funding from those that passed the evaluation thresholds, on the basis of the results of the evaluation by experts.
Pristojni oddelek izmed tistih predlogov, ki so dosegli ocenjevalne pragove, sestavi končni seznam predlogov za predvideno financiranje na podlagi rezultatov ocenjevanja strokovnjakov.
Due account is taken of the scores received and of any advice from the experts.
Prejete ocene in vsi nasveti strokovnjakov se ustrezno upoštevajo.
It will also take account of the available budget, the strategic objectives of the programme, the Union or Euratom policies, as well as the overall balance of proposals to be funded.
Upoštevajo se tudi razpoložljiva proračunska sredstva, strateški cilji programa, politike Unije ali Euratoma in splošna uravnoteženost predlogov, predvidenih za financiranje.
The number of proposals in the list depends upon the available budget.
Število predlogov na seznamu je odvisno od razpoložljivih proračunskih sredstev.
Proposals are ranked in priority order, unless there is sufficient budget to fund all proposals having passed the necessary thresholds.
Predlogi se razvrstijo po prednostnem vrstnem redu, razen če je proračunskih sredstev dovolj za financiranje vseh predlogov, ki so dosegli potrebne pragove.
As a general rule, the Commission follows the priority order of proposals suggested by the experts.
Kot splošno pravilo Komisija upošteva prednostni vrstni red predlogov, ki so ga predlagali strokovnjaki.
In exceptional cases, duly justified and authorised at an appropriate level, a proposal may be placed in a different order than the one suggested by experts.
V izjemnih primerih, ki so ustrezno utemeljeni in odobreni na ustrezni ravni, se lahko predlog razvrsti po drugačnem vrstnem redu, kot so ga predlagali strokovnjaki.
The reasons for arriving at the order are set out.
Razlogi za razvrščanje so navedeni.
A suggested Union or Euratom financial contribution is determined for each of these proposals, based on the comments of the experts, and on the department’s own analyses.
Predlagani finančni prispevek Unije ali Euratoma se določi za vsakega od teh predlogov na podlagi mnenj strokovnjakov in lastnih analiz oddelka.
Budget cuts are possible, but will not be made for the purpose of supporting additional projects that would not otherwise be funded.
Zmanjšanje proračuna je mogoče, vendar ne zaradi podpore dodatnih projektov, ki se drugače ne bi financirali.
The responsible department then consults the other interested departments and directorates-general on the list of proposals it intends to select for funding, including the suggested Union or Euratom financial contribution for each proposal.
Pristojni oddelek se nato posvetuje z drugimi zainteresiranimi oddelki in generalnimi direktorati v zvezi s seznamom predlogov, ki jih namerava izbrati za financiranje, in tudi o predvidenem finančnem prispevku Unije ali Euratoma za vsak predlog.
A reserve list may be indicated (see below).
Sestavi se lahko rezervni seznam (glej spodaj).
The internal consultation also addresses any aspects that would need to be modified during negotiation, based on the advice of the experts.
Med notranjim posvetovanjem se obravnavajo tudi vidiki, ki bi jih bilo treba med pogajanji spremeniti na podlagi nasvetov strokovnjakov.
This might include special conditions regarding the merging of proposals, or conditional funding suggested by the experts (see section 3.8).
To lahko vključuje posebne pogoje v zvezi z združevanjem predlogov ali pogojno financiranje, ki ga predlagajo strokovnjaki (glej oddelek 3.8).
Following this internal consultation, the final Commission ranked list and negotiation mandates are established.
Po opravljenem notranjem posvetovanju se določijo končni razvrstitveni seznam Komisije in pogajalski mandati.
If the consultation reveals that very similar work is already funded elsewhere, or if a proposal would result in work that is manifestly contrary to established Union or Euratom policies, it is possible that a project that had originally been put forward for funding by the responsible department does not appear on the final Commission ranked list.
Če je bilo med posvetovanjem ugotovljeno, da se zelo podobna dejavnost že financira drugje, ali če bi bil rezultat predloga dejavnost, ki je v očitnem nasprotju z uveljavljenimi politikami Unije ali Euratoma, se lahko zgodi, da se projekt, ki ga je pristojni oddelek prvotno predvidel za financiranje, ne pojavi na končnem razvrstitvenem seznamu Komisije.
The list of proposals to be retained for negotiation takes into account the budget available (as indicated in the call for proposals).
Seznam predlogov, ki se zadržijo za pogajanja, upošteva razpoložljiva proračunska sredstva (določena v razpisu za zbiranje predlogov).
A number of proposals may be kept in reserve to allow for eventualities such as the failure of negotiations on projects, the withdrawal of proposals, budget savings agreed during negotiation, or the availability of additional budget from other sources.
Nekaj predlogov je lahko v rezervi, da se upoštevajo okoliščine, kot so neuspeh pogajanj o projektu, umik predlogov, proračunski prihranki, sprejeti med pogajanji, ali razpoložljivost dodatnih proračunskih sredstev iz drugih virov.
The coordinators of any proposals held in reserve receive confirmation that negotiations with a view to preparing a grant agreement may be offered, but only if further funding becomes available.
Koordinatorji vseh predlogov na rezervnem seznamu prejmejo potrdilo, da obstaja možnost pogajanj za pripravo sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev, vendar le, če se bodo sprostila dodatna finančna sredstva.
This confirmation may also indicate a date after which no further offers of negotiations are likely to be made.
Potrdilo lahko vsebuje tudi datum, po katerem ponudbe za pogajanja niso več verjetne.
When the budget for the particular call has been used up, the coordinators of unfunded proposals remaining from the “reserve” will be informed, and the proposals will be rejected (see below).
Ko je bil proračun za določen razpis porabljen, se koordinatorji predlogov, ki se ne financirajo in niso vključeni na rezervni seznam, o tem obvestijo, predlogi pa se zavrnejo (glej spodaj).
The Commission formally decides to reject those proposals found to be ineligible (whether before, or during the course of the evaluation), failing any of the thresholds for evaluation criteria, and those which, because they fall below a certain ranking, cannot be funded because the available budget is insufficient.
Komisija sprejme formalni sklep o zavrnitvi tistih predlogov, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev (bodisi pred ocenjevanjem ali med njim), tistih, ki ne dosegajo pragov za ocenjevalna merila in tistih, ki se ne morejo financirati, ker ne dosegajo določene uvrstitve in za njih ni zadostnih proračunskih sredstev.
The Commission may reject all proposals below a certain rank, regardless of the availability of budget and the comments of experts, if it considers that the level of quality is insufficient to merit support.
Komisija lahko zavrne vse predloge, ki ne dosegajo določene uvrstitve, ne glede na razpoložljivost proračunskih sredstev in mnenja strokovnjakov, če meni, da raven kakovosti ni zadostna za pridobitev podpore.
The Commission may also reject proposals on ethical grounds following an ethics review (see Annex A), or on security grounds following the procedure described in Annex B.
Komisija lahko prav tako zavrne predloge iz etičnih razlogov po opravljeni etični presoji (glej Prilogo A) ali iz varnostnih razlogov po postopku, opisanem v Prilogi B.
After a rejection decision, coordinators of rejected proposals are informed in writing of the Commission’s decision.
Komisija po sprejemu sklepa o zavrnitvi o tem pisno obvesti koordinatorje zavrnjenih predlogov.
The letter informing them also includes an explanation of the reasons for rejection.
Sklep vsebuje tudi obrazložitev vzrokov za zavrnitev predloga.
The Commission will not reject proposals that are the subject of an ongoing redress procedure (see section 5.3).
Komisija ne sme zavrniti predlogov, za katere poteka pritožbeni postopek (glej oddelek 5.3).
NEGOTIATION AND AWARD
POGAJANJA IN DODELITEV
The coordinators of proposals that have not been rejected, and for which funding is available, are invited to begin negotiations.
Koordinatorji predlogov, ki niso bili zavrnjeni in za katere so na voljo finančna sredstva, so povabljeni, da začnejo pogajanja.
If this takes place before the Commission ranked list and negotiation mandates have been finalised, the invitation will make clear that negotiations may have to be terminated, or the negotiation mandate modified, if so required following the results of the consultation of other departments.
Če se to zgodi pred dokončanjem razvrstitvenega seznama Komisije in pogajalskih mandatov, je v vabilu treba jasno navesti, da se pogajanja lahko prekinejo ali da se pogajalski mandat lahko spremeni, če tako zahtevajo rezultati posvetovanj z drugimi oddelki.
The Commission may be assisted by experts during the negotiation, possibly including those involved during the evaluation stage.
Komisiji med pogajanji lahko pomagajo strokovnjaki, tudi tisti, ki so bili vključeni v fazi ocenjevanja.
In addition to any points raised in the ESR, the applicants may receive requests for further administrative, legal, technical and financial information necessary for the preparation of a grant agreement [33].
Poleg odprtih vprašanj iz zbirnih poročil o ocenjevanju se od vložnikov lahko zahteva, da predložijo druge administrativne, pravne, tehnične in finančne informacije, ki so potrebne za pripravo sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev [33].
The Commission may request changes, possibly including modifications to the budget, in line with the negotiation mandate mentioned above (section 4.1).
Komisija lahko zahteva spremembe, ki po potrebi vključujejo spremembe proračuna, v skladu z zgoraj navedenim pogajalskim mandatom (oddelek 4.1).
The Commission will justify all requested changes.
Komisija utemelji vse zahtevane spremembe.
Changes to the managerial and scientific aspects would cover, in particular, revisions to the proposed work as established in the negotiation mandate described in section 4.1.
Spremembe vodstvenih in znanstvenih vidikov zlasti vključujejo revizije predlagane dejavnosti, kakor je bilo določeno v pogajalskem mandatu, opisanem v oddelku 4.1.
The legal aspects would cover, in particular, the verification of the existence and legal status of the participants, review of any special clauses in the grant agreement, or conditions required for the project, and other aspects relating to the development of the final grant agreement (including date of start of project, timing of reports and other legal requirements).
Pravni vidiki zlasti zajemajo potrjevanje obstoja in pravnega statusa udeležencev, preverjanje posebnih klavzul iz sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev ali obveznih pogojev projekta ter drugih vidikov, ki določajo vsebino končnega sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev (vključno z datumom začetka projekta, časovno uskladitvijo poročil in drugimi pravnimi zahtevami).
The financial aspects would cover the establishment of the EC contribution, up to a set maximum, the amount of the pre-financing, the estimated breakdown of budget and Union or Euratom financial contribution per activity and per participant, and the assessment of the financial capacity of the coordinator and any other participants, if needed.
Finančni vidiki zajemajo določitev prispevka ES do določene najvišje stopnje, znesek predhodnega financiranja, predvideno razdelitev proračunskih sredstev ter finančni prispevek Unije ali Euratoma na ukrep in na udeleženca ter oceno finančne zmogljivosti koordinatorja in vseh drugih udeležencev, če je potrebno.
Grants may not be awarded to potential participants who are, at the time of a grant award procedure, in one of the situations referred to in Articles 93 and 94 of the Financial Regulation (relating, for example, to bankruptcy, convictions, grave professional misconduct, social security obligations, other illegal activities, previous break of contract, conflicts of interest, misrepresentation).
Sredstva se ne smejo dodeliti potencialnim udeležencem, ki so med postopkom dodelitve sredstev v enem od položajev iz členov 93 in 94 finančne uredbe (npr. stečaj, obsodba, hujša kršitev poklicnega ravnanja, obveznosti socialnega varstva, druge nezakonite dejavnosti, predhodna kršitev pogodbe, navzkrižja interesov, zavajajoče prikazovanje).
Any potential participant who has committed an irregularity in the implementation of any other action under a Union or Euratom Programme may be excluded from the selection procedure at any time, with due regard being given to the principle of proportionality.
Vsak potencialen udeleženec, ki je povzročil nepravilnost pri izvajanju katerega koli drugega ukrepa v okviru programa Unije ali Euratoma, je lahko kadar koli izključen iz izbirnega postopka, pri čemer se ustrezno upošteva načelo sorazmernosti.
Any proposal that contravenes fundamental ethical principles or which does not fulfil the conditions set out in the work programme or in the call for proposals shall not be selected [34].
Predlog, ki je v nasprotju s temeljnimi etičnimi načeli ali ne izpolnjuje pogojev, določenih v delovnem programu ali razpisu za zbiranje predlogov, se ne izbere [34].
In line with Article 54(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, an expenditure co-financed by FP7 shall not receive assistance from the Structural Funds.
V skladu s členom 54(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 izdatki, ki se sofinancirajo v okviru 7OP, ne prejmejo podpore iz strukturnih skladov.
Any arrangements for merging projects are also dealt with in this phase, and ethical issues (see Annex A) or security considerations (see Annex B) are clarified and addressed, if necessary.
V tej fazi se upoštevajo tudi vse ureditve za združevanje projektov, razjasnijo in obravnavajo pa se tudi etična (glej Prilogo A) ali varnostna vprašanja (glej Prilogo B), če je potrebno.