natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The company further claimed that, in case the export price were to be adjusted for the commission of the related trader in the third country pursuant to Article 2(10)(i), an identical adjustment to the normal value should be made, since this trader would also coordinate domestic sales.
Družba je nadalje trdila, da bi bilo treba v primeru prilagoditve izvozne cene za provizijo povezanega trgovca v tretji državi v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) opraviti popolnoma enako prilagoditev normalne vrednosti, ker bi ta trgovec usklajeval tudi domačo prodajo.
However, the written contract between the trader and the producer in Indonesia only covers export sales.
Vendar pisna pogodba med trgovcem in proizvajalcem v Indoneziji zajema le izvoz.
Moreover, domestic sales are invoiced by the company in Indonesia.
Poleg tega trgovinski račun za domačo prodajo izda družba v Indoneziji.
In respect of the adjustment pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation, it is considered appropriate to use a reasonable profit margin independent of the actual profit resulting from transfer prices in order to avoid any distorting effects that may arise from the transfer prices.
V zvezi s prilagoditvijo v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe se šteje za primerno, da se zaradi preprečitve kakršnih koli izkrivljajočih učinkov, ki bi lahko izhajali iz transfernih cen, uporabi razumna stopnja dobička, neodvisna od dejanskega dobička na podlagi transfernih cen.
Therefore, the actual profit margins of the traders in the third country which were used at the provisional stage were replaced by a profit of 5 % which is considered a reasonable profit for the activities carried out by trading companies in the chemical sector, as was done in previous cases [7].
Zato so se dejanske stopnje dobička trgovcev v tretji državi, ki so se uporabile v začasni fazi, nadomestile s 5-odstotnim dobičkom, ki se kot v prejšnjih primerih šteje za razumen dobiček pri dejavnostih, ki jih opravljajo trgovske družbe v kemičnem sektorju, kot je bilo narejeno v prejšnjih primerih [7].
Another Indonesian company claimed that the Commission had deducted twice commission expenses for sales via its related importer in the Union.
Druga indonezijska družba je trdila, da je Komisija dvakrat odštela stroške provizije za prodajo prek povezanega uvoznika v Uniji.
The company argued that an adjustment for both the related importer’s SG&A expenses as well as commission expenses as a direct selling expense was made when constructing the export price pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Družba je trdila, da se je pri računski določitvi izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe izvedla prilagoditev za PSA-stroške povezanega uvoznika in stroške provizije kot neposredne stroške prodaje.
Since the commission expenses are already included in the SG&A expenses, this resulted in a double deduction for commission expenses.
Ker so stroški provizije že vključeni v PSA-stroške, so se stroški provizije tako dvakrat odšteli.
This claim was found to be justified and the calculation was amended accordingly.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je ta trditev utemeljena, in izračun je bil ustrezno spremenjen.
One company reiterated its claim for an adjustment for differences in physical characteristics on the basis that it exports the product concerned in both liquid and solid form to the Union whilst it only sells it in solid form on the domestic market and that the prices for the liquid form are lower than those for the solid form of the product investigated (see recital 39 of the provisional Regulation).
Ena družba je ponovno zahtevala prilagoditev zaradi razlik v fizikalnih lastnostih na podlagi tega, da izvaža zadevni izdelek v EU v tekoči in trdni obliki, medtem ko ga na domačem trgu prodaja samo v trdni obliki, pri čemer so cene za tekočo obliko nižje od cen za trdno obliko izdelka v preiskavi (glej uvodno izjavo 39 začasne uredbe).
To support the claim the company submitted the copy of two invoices for sales to other export markets.
V podporo trditvi je družba predložila kopijo dveh računov za prodajo na druge izvozne trge.
However, this evidence could not be verified at this late stage of the proceeding, nor could it be ascertained that the difference shown was applicable to all cases where the above differences in physical characteristics existed.
Vendar tega dokaza v tej pozni fazi postopka ni bilo mogoče preveriti, prav tako pa ni bilo mogoče potrditi, da se je prikazana razlika uporabljala za vse primere, v katerih so bile prisotne navedene razlike v fizikalnih lastnostih.
Following provisional disclosure, one Indonesian exporter claimed that the interest rate used for the calculation of credit costs of its related importer in the Union in the provisional Regulation was disproportionate and suggested to use an interest rate based on figures published for the IP by Deutsche Bundesbank.
Po začasnem razkritju je eden od indonezijskih izvoznikov trdil, da je bila obrestna mera, ki se je upoštevala pri izračunu stroškov kredita povezanega uvoznika v Uniji, uporabljenem v začasni uredbi, nesorazmerna in je predlagal uporabo obrestne mere na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je za OP objavila Deutsche Bundesbank.
Since the interest rate figure used for the calculation of credit costs for this company in the provisional Regulation was based on information submitted by other parties and therefore reflects their specific financial situation which is not necessarily applicable to the related importer in question, the claim was accepted and the calculation was amended accordingly.
Ker so podatki o obrestni meri, ki so se uporabili za izračun kreditnih stroškov za to družbo v začasni uredbi, temeljili na informacijah, ki so jih predložile druge strani, in tako izražajo njihov specifičen finančni položaj, ki ni nujno relevanten za zadevnega povezanega uvoznika, je bila trditev sprejeta in izračun ustrezno spremenjen.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the comparison, the provisional findings in recitals 37 to 40 of the provisional Regulation — adjusted as explained in recitals 36, 37 and 39 of this Regulation — are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 37 do 40 začasne uredbe – prilagojene, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 36, 37 in 39 – potrdijo.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the dumping margin calculation, the content of recitals 41 and 42 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izračunom stopnje dampinga ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 41 in 42 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Following the provisional disclosure, one of the Malaysian exporting producers claimed that the profitability test in the ordinary course of trade assessment (see recital 46 of the provisional Regulation) should not have been based on the weighted average annual cost of production but that, given the daily price fluctuations of the main raw material, individual cost of each domestic transaction should have been used.
Po začasnem razkritju je eden od malezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov trdil, da preizkus dobičkonosnosti v okviru ocene običajnega poteka trgovine (glej uvodno izjavo 46 začasne uredbe) ne bi smel temeljiti na tehtanem povprečju letnih stroškov proizvodnje, ampak bi se morali zaradi dnevnih nihanj cen glavne surovine uporabiti posamezni stroški vsake domače transakcije.
With regard to this claim it should be underlined that it is the Commission's consistent practice to use weighted average cost of production as a benchmark for the profitability test.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba izpostaviti, da je uporaba tehtanega povprečja stroškov proizvodnje kot merila za preizkus dobičkonosnosti ustaljena praksa Komisije.
This format was followed by the company in its reply to the questionnaire and constituted the basis for the on-spot verification visit which reconciled the data reported by the company with the company’s accounts.
Te trditve se je družba držala v svojem odgovoru na vprašalnike, prav tako pa je bila podlaga za preveritveni obisk, pri katerem so se podatki, ki jih je sporočila družba, uskladili z računovodskimi izkazi družbe.
The claim to use a transaction-based cost of production, which would constitute a significant departure from the normal practice of the Commission, was raised for the first time in the company’s comments to the provisional disclosure document and corresponding figures could therefore not be verified on spot.
Zahtevek za uporabo stroškov proizvodnje na podlagi transakcij, ki bi pomenila bistveno odstopanje od običajne prakse Komisije, je bil prvič izpostavljen v pripombah družbe k dokumentu o začasnem razkritju, ustreznih številk zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti na kraju samem.
It should also be noted that the individual transaction cost sheets submitted by the company in support of their claim are to a large extent based on estimations and therefore fail to represent more accurate and representative costs data than the ones initially reported by the company and verified on spot.
Navesti je treba tudi, da dokumentacija o stroških posameznih transakcij, ki jo je družba predložila v podporo svoji trditvi, v veliki meri temelji na ocenah ter zato ne zagotavlja podatkov o stroških, ki bi bili natančnejši in bolj reprezentativni od podatkov, ki jih je družba prvotno sporočila in so bili preverjeni na kraju samem.
Lastly, it should be noted that the structure of the new cost sheet provided does not allow reconciliation with this part of management reports which were verified on spot.
Nazadnje je treba navesti, da struktura predložene nove dokumentacije o stroških ne omogoča usklajevanja s tem delom poročil o upravljanju, ki so bila preverjena na kraju samem.
The Malaysian exporter with no domestic sales (see recital 51 of the provisional Regulation) claimed that the amounts for SG&A costs and for profits used for the calculation of the normal value should not be based on the weighted average of the actual amounts determined for the two other exporting producers selling the like product in the Malaysian market.
Malezijski izvoznik brez domače prodaje (glej uvodno izjavo 51 začasne uredbe) je trdil, da zneski za PSA-stroške in dobičke, ki se uporabijo v izračunu normalne vrednosti, ne smejo temeljiti na tehtanem povprečju dejanskih zneskov, določenih za druga dva proizvajalca izvoznika, ki prodajata podobni izdelek na malezijskem trgu.
The company claimed that these figures are not representative, as the company is using different manufacturing methods involving different basic raw material.
Družba je trdila, da te številke niso reprezentativne, saj uporablja različne proizvodne metode z različnimi osnovnimi surovinami.
With regard to this claim it should be recalled that in the calculation of the normal value the company’s own manufacturing costs were used.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba opozoriti, da so se pri izračunu normalne vrednosti uporabili lastni proizvodni stroški družbe.
Only the amounts concerning SG&A costs were based on the figures obtained from the two other Malaysian exporting producers.
Na številkah, ki sta jih predložila druga dva malezijska proizvajalca izvoznika, so temeljili samo zneski glede PSA-stroškov.
As regards the amount for profit, it was determined as explained in recital 45 of this Regulation.
Glede zneska dobička je bilo določeno, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi 45.
Secondly, the company failed to explain the alleged effect of the production method used on SG&A costs.
Družba tudi ni pojasnila domnevnih učinkov uporabljene proizvodne metode na PSA-stroške.
Furthermore, it is noted that only a limited part of the production of the company is based on the allegedly different production method while substantial part of the production is manufactured with the same production process and with use of the same basic raw materials as in the case of the other two Malaysian producers.
Poleg tega je treba navesti, da le omejen del proizvodnje družbe temelji na domnevno drugačni proizvodni metodi, medtem ko se za bistveni del proizvodnje uporabljajo enak proizvodni postopek in enake osnovne surovine kot pri drugih dveh malezijskih proizvajalcih.
Therefore, it is concluded that the company failed to demonstrate that the figures used were not representative and the claim in this regard is rejected.
Zato se sklene, da družba ni dokazala, da uporabljene številke niso bile reprezentativne, in trditev v zvezi s tem se zavrne.
The same Malaysian exporter further claimed that, should the Commission nevertheless use the data from the two other exporters for the purpose of establishing SG&A, such data should be based on the weighted average figures relating to all the domestic transactions of those exporting producers and not only relating to the profitable transactions.
Isti malezijski izvoznik je nadalje trdil, da če bi Komisija za določitev PSA vseeno uporabila podatke drugih dveh izvoznikov bi morali takšni podatki temeljiti na tehtanem povprečju številk, ki se nanašajo na vse domače transakcije navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in ne le na dobičkonosne transakcije.
In principle this claim was accepted.
Ta trditev je bila načeloma sprejeta.
Thus, as regards SG&A, it is confirmed that the average SG&A costs for all domestic transactions of the two Malaysian exporting producers were used in constructing the normal value.
V zvezi s PSA je zato potrjeno, da so se pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti uporabili povprečni PSA-stroški za vse domače transakcije drugih dveh malezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The figures used for this calculation were verified during verification visits in the respective Malaysian companies.
Številke, uporabljene za ta izračun, so bile preverjene med preveritvenimi obiski zadevnih malezijskih družb.
No profit data could therefore be established on that basis.
Zato na tej osnovi ni bilo mogoče določiti podatkov glede dobička.
In that respect, the claim by the Malaysian exporter that a negative amount can be used as a profit amount for the construction of normal value is rejected.
V tem primeru se trditev malezijskega izvoznika, da je za izračun normalne vrednosti negativen znesek mogoče uporabiti za znesek dobička, zavrne.
Indeed, the concept of profit necessarily implies the existence of a positive amount.
Koncept dobička vedno pomeni obstoj pozitivnega zneska.
It was also considered whether the amount for profit could be established on the basis of the profitable sales of the exporting producer in Malaysia but that approach was rejected as it would have been in contradiction with the WTO findings in the case on Imports of Cotton Type Bed Linen from India [8].
Preučeno je bilo tudi, ali je znesek dobička mogoče določiti na osnovi dobičkonosne prodaje proizvajalca izvoznika v Maleziji, vendar je bil ta pristop zavrnjen, ker bi bil v nasprotju z ugotovitvami STO v primeru uvoza bombažnega posteljnega perila iz Indije [8].
Therefore, pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation, the calculation of the profit has to be based on any other reasonable method and, in the absence of any other available data, the long-term commercial interest rate in Malaysia was considered as the most appropriate basis for establishing profit.
Zato mora izračun dobička v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe temeljiti na kateri koli drugi razumni metodi, pri čemer se je ob odsotnosti kakršnih koli drugih razpoložljivih podatkov dolgoročna tržna obrestna mera v Maleziji štela za najustreznejšo podlago za določitev dobička.
This method was considered conservative, reasonable and the most appropriate within the meaning of Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Ta metoda se je štela za konzervativno, razumno in najustreznejšo v smislu člena 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It is noted that the profit margin so established does not exceed the profit realised by other exporting producers on sales of products of the same general category in the domestic market of the country of origin.
Ugotavlja se, da tako določene stopnje dobička ne presegajo dobička, ki so ga realizirali drugi proizvajalci izvozniki pri prodaji izdelkov iste splošne kategorije na domačem trgu države porekla.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of normal value, the provisional findings in recitals 44 to 51 of the provisional Regulation, but for the amendment as explained in the recital 45 of this Regulation, are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo normalne vrednosti ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 44 do 51 začasne uredbe, vendar spremenjene, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 45, potrdijo.
For export sales to the Union through related importers located in the Union, following provisional disclosure, the two Malaysian exporters claimed that the profit margin used for the construction of the export price pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation was inappropriate.
V zvezi z izvozom v Unijo prek povezanih uvoznikov s sedežem v Uniji sta po začasnem razkritju malezijska izvoznika trdila, da stopnja dobička, ki se je uporabila pri računski določitvi izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, ni bila ustrezna.
One of the companies supported its claims by the IP profitability figures of some of their European unrelated traders.
Ena od družb je svoje trditve podprla s podatki o dobičkonosnosti nekaterih njunih evropskih nepovezanih trgovcev v OP.
In this regard, it should be noted that these figures cannot be considered representative, as the traders indicated trade in a wide range of chemical products, and in one case the trader is also a producer.
V zvezi s tem je treba navesti, da se ti podatki ne morejo obravnavati kot reprezentativni, ker so trgovci navedli trgovino s številnimi kemičnimi izdelki, pri čemer je v enem primeru trgovec tudi proizvajalec.
Therefore, they are rejected as a reliable benchmark.
Zato se ne sprejmejo kot zanesljivo merilo.
The second company claimed that its related importer in the Union should not be treated as a distributor but as a related agent and therefore the SG&A cost and profit adjustment in the construction of the export price should not exceed the percentage of commission normally granted to independent agents trading in the sector.
Druga družba je trdila, da se njen povezani uvoznik v EU ne sme obravnavati kot distributer, ampak kot povezan zastopnik, zato prilagoditev PSA-stroškov in dobička pri računski določitvi izvozne cene ne sme preseči odstotka provizije, ki se običajno dodeli neodvisnim zastopnikom, ki trgujejo v sektorju.
The company submitted its agreements with independent agents as a benchmark.
Družba je kot merilo predložila sporazume, ki jih je sklenila z neodvisnimi zastopniki.
The claim was further developed after the definitive disclosure by arguing that in the tungsten electrodes case [9] the profit of a related importer was considered reliable and accepted in the construction of the export price.
Po dokončnem razkritju se je trditev še naprej razvila z utemeljitvijo, da se je v primeru volframovih elektrod [9] dobiček povezanega uvoznika štel za zanesljivega in ga je bilo mogoče uporabiti pri konstruiranju izvozne cene.
In reply to this claim it should be noted that Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation does not provide for different treatment between related importers allegedly acting as distributors and importers allegedly acting as agents.
V odgovor na to trditev je treba navesti, da člen 2(9) osnovne uredbe ne predvideva različnega obravnavanja povezanih uvoznikov, ki domnevno opravljajo funkcijo distributerjev, in uvoznikov, ki domnevno opravljajo funkcijo zastopnikov.
Article 2(9) requires adjustments for all costs incurred between importation and resale and for profits accruing.
Člen 2(9) določa prilagoditev za vse stroške, plačane med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, ter nastale dobičke.
Furthermore, it should be noted the investigation showed that the related company is located in the Union.
Poleg tega je treba navesti, da je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da ima povezana družba sedež v Uniji.
It handles, inter alia, the customer orders and the invoicing of the product concerned produced by its related exporter as well as is responsible for arranging the Union customs clearance.
Med drugim je odgovorna za naročila strank in izdajanje trgovinskih računov za zadevni izdelek, ki ga proizvaja povezani izvoznik, ter za urejanje postopkov carinjenja EU.
The fact that certain activities are performed by the related exporter prior to importation does not mean that the export price may not be reconstructed on the basis of the resale price to the first independent customer with the necessary allowances being made pursuant to Article 2(9).
Dejstvo, da povezani izvoznik pred uvozom izvaja nekatere dejavnosti, ne pomeni, da izvozne cene ni mogoče ponovno računsko določiti na podlagi cene pri nadaljnji prodaji prvi neodvisni stranki skupaj s potrebnimi nadomestili v skladu s členom 2(9).
Differences in functions claimed by the company as compared to other related importers are normally reflected in the SG&A expenses where the Commission used actual data of the company.
Razlike v funkcijah v primerjavi z drugimi povezanimi uvozniki, ki jih je izpostavila družba, so običajno izražene v PSA-stroških, pri čemer je Komisija uporabila dejanske podatke družbe.
Therefore, this claim can not be accepted.
Zato se ta trditev ne more sprejeti.
It should be further noted that in the abovementioned tungsten electrodes case the related importer was further integrated into the downstream product produced by the related group and was also performing other activities than those of a trading company.
Opozoriti je tudi treba, da je bil v navedenem primeru glede volframovih elektrod povezani uvoznik nadalje vključen v proizvodni proces izdelka, ki ga proizvaja povezana skupina, in je poleg dejavnosti trgovske družbe izvajal tudi druge dejavnosti.
Therefore, for such complex structure, the profit of unrelated importers was found not to be representative enough.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da za takšne kompleksne strukture dobiček nepovezanih uvoznikov ni dovolj reprezentativen.
The situation in that case is not comparable with the situation of the Malaysian related importer in question, which only performs trading functions.
Razmere v navedenem primeru niso primerljive z razmerami zadevnega malezijskega povezanega uvoznika, ki le izvaja funkcije trgovanja.
Nevertheless, for the reasons explained in recital 29, the profit margin in question is adjusted to 5 %.
Kljub temu se na podlagi razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodni izjavi 29, zadevna stopnja dobička prilagodi na 5 %.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the determination of export price, the provisional findings in recitals 52 to 54 of the provisional Regulation, but for the amendment as explained above, are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo izvozne cene ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 52 do 54 začasne uredbe, vendar spremenjene, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure one Malaysian exporter reiterated its claim (see also recital 57 of the provisional Regulation) that its related importer in the Union is, in fact, the export department of the manufacturer and that there would be excessive deductions in establishing the ex-works export price if full adjustments for SG&A costs and profits, pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, were made.
Po začasnem razkritju je en malezijski izvoznik ponovil svojo trditev (glej tudi uvodno izjavo 57 začasne uredbe), da je njegov povezani uvoznik v Uniji pravzaprav proizvajalčev izvozni oddelek in da bodo pri določanju izvozne cene franko tovarna odbitki preveliki, če se bodo uporabile polne prilagoditve za PSA-stroške in dobičke na podlagi člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
The company claimed that, alternatively, a similar adjustment should be made when calculating the normal value.
Družba je trdila, da je treba sicer podobno prilagoditev uporabiti pri izračunu normalne vrednosti.
The claim was reiterated again in the submission after definitive disclosure.
Trditev se je ponovila v predložitvi po dokončnem razkritju.