natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden,
ob upoštevanju pobude Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Bolgarije, Republike Estonije, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Italijanske republike, Republike Madžarske, Republike Poljske, Portugalske republike, Romunije, Republike Finske in Kraljevine Švedske,
The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
(1) Evropska unija si je zadala cilj ohraniti in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
Article 82(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the Union shall be based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions.
V členu 82(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je določeno, da pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah v Uniji temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in pravosodnih odločb.
According to the Stockholm Programme — An open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens [2], mutual recognition should extend to all types of judgments and decisions of a judicial nature, which may, depending on the legal system, be either criminal or administrative.
V skladu s Stockholmskim programom – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje [2], ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju 10. in 11. decembra 2009, bi bilo treba vzajemno priznavanje razširiti na vse vrste sodb in odločb pravosodne narave, ki so lahko, odvisno od pravnega sistema, kazenske ali upravne.
It also calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine how to improve legislation and practical support measures for the protection of victims.
Komisija in države članice so tudi pozvane, da preučijo, kako bi lahko izboljšale zakonodajo in praktične podporne ukrepe za zaščito žrtev.
The programme also points out that victims of crime can be offered special protection measures which should be effective within the Union.
V programu je prav tako izpostavljeno, da se lahko za žrtve kaznivih dejanj predvidijo posebni zaščitni ukrepi, ki bi morali veljati v vsej Uniji.
This Directive forms part of a coherent and comprehensive set of measures on victims’ rights.
Ta direktiva je del skladnega in celovitega sklopa ukrepov v zvezi s pravicami žrtev.
The resolution of the European Parliament of 26 November 2009 on the elimination of violence against women calls on Member States to improve their national laws and policies to combat all forms of violence against women and to act in order to tackle the causes of violence against women, not least by employing preventive measures and calls on the Union to guarantee the right to assistance and support for all victims of violence.
(4) Evropski parlament je v resoluciji z dne 26. novembra 2009 o odpravi nasilja nad ženskami pozval države članice, da izboljšajo svojo zakonodajo in politiko za boj proti vsem oblikam nasilja nad ženskami in da sprejmejo ukrepe za odpravo vzrokov nasilja nad ženskami, med drugim tudi preventivne ukrepe; nadalje je pozval Unijo, da vsem žrtvam nasilja zagotovi pravico do pomoči in podpore.
The resolution of the European Parliament of 10 February 2010 on equality between women and men in the European Union 2009 endorses the proposal to introduce the European protection order for victims.
Evropski parlament je v resoluciji z dne 10. februarja 2010 o enakosti žensk in moških v Evropski uniji – 2009 podprl predlog za uvedbo evropske odredbe o zaščiti žrtev.
In its Resolution of 10 June 2011 on a Roadmap for strengthening the rights and protection of victims, in particular in criminal proceedings, the Council stated that action should be taken at the level of the Union in order to strengthen the rights and protection of victims of crime and called on the Commission to present appropriate proposals to that end.
Svet je v resoluciji z dne 10. junija 2011 o načrtu za okrepitev pravic in zaščite žrtev, zlasti v kazenskih postopkih, zapisal, da bi bilo treba na ravni Unije sprejeti ukrepe za okrepitev pravic in zaščite žrtev kaznivih dejanj, ter pozval Komisijo, da v ta namen predloži ustrezne predloge.
In this framework, a mechanism should be created to ensure mutual recognition among Member States of decisions concerning protection measures for victims of crime.
V tej zvezi bi bilo treba vzpostaviti mehanizem za vzajemno priznavanje odločb o ukrepih za zaščito žrtev kaznivih dejanj med državami članicami.
According to that Resolution, this Directive, which concerns the mutual recognition of protection measures taken in criminal matters, should be complemented by an appropriate mechanism concerning measures taken in civil matters.
V skladu z navedeno resolucijo bi to direktivo, ki zadeva vzajemno priznavanje zaščitnih ukrepov v kazenskih zadevah, moral dopolnjevati ustrezen mehanizem za ukrepe v civilnih zadevah.
In a common area of justice without internal borders, it is necessary to ensure that the protection provided to a natural person in one Member State is maintained and continued in any other Member State to which the person moves or has moved.
V skupnem območju pravice brez notranjih meja je treba zagotoviti, da se zaščita fizične osebe, zagotovljena v eni državi članici, ohrani in nadaljuje v kateri koli drugi državi članici, v katero se oseba preseli ali se je že preselila.
It should also be ensured that the legitimate exercise by citizens of the Union of their right to move and reside freely within the territory of Member States, in accordance with Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 21 TFEU, does not result in a loss of their protection.
Treba bi bilo tudi zagotoviti, da legitimno uveljavljanje pravice državljanov Unije do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic v skladu s členom 3(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členom 21 PDEU ne bi povzročilo izgube njihove zaščite.
In order to attain these objectives, this Directive should set out rules whereby the protection stemming from certain protection measures adopted according to the law of one Member State (‘the issuing State’) can be extended to another Member State in which the protected person decides to reside or stay (‘the executing State’).
Za dosego teh ciljev bi morala biti v tej direktivi določena pravila, s katerimi se lahko zaščita, ki izhaja iz določenih zaščitnih ukrepov, sprejetih v skladu s pravom ene države članice (v nadaljnjem besedilu: država izdaje), razširi na drugo državo članico, v kateri se zaščitena oseba odloči prebivati ali zadrževati (v nadaljnjem besedilu: država izvršitve).
This Directive takes account of the different legal traditions of the Member States as well as the fact that effective protection can be provided by means of protection orders issued by an authority other than a criminal court.
V tej direktivi so upoštevane različne pravne tradicije držav članic, pa tudi dejstvo, da se lahko učinkovita zaščita zagotovi z odredbami o zaščiti, ki jih izda organ, ki ni kazensko sodišče.
This Directive does not create obligations to modify national systems for adopting protection measures nor does it create obligations to introduce or amend a criminal law system for executing a European protection order.
Ta direktiva ne določa obveznosti spremembe nacionalnih sistemov za sprejem zaščitnih ukrepov in tudi ne določa obveznosti uvedbe ali spremembe kazenskopravnega sistema za izvrševanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
This Directive applies to protection measures which aim specifically to protect a person against a criminal act of another person which may, in any way, endanger that person’s life or physical, psychological and sexual integrity, for example by preventing any form of harassment, as well as that person’s dignity or personal liberty, for example by preventing abductions, stalking and other forms of indirect coercion, and which aim to prevent new criminal acts or to reduce the consequences of previous criminal acts.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za zaščitne ukrepe, katerih namen je zlasti zaščititi osebo pred kaznivim dejanjem druge osebe, ki lahko na kakršen koli način ogrozi življenje ali telesno, duševno celovitost in spolno nedotakljivost te osebe, na primer s preprečevanjem kakršne koli oblike nadlegovanja, ter dostojanstvo ali osebno svobodo te osebe, na primer s preprečevanjem ugrabitev, zalezovanja in drugih oblik posredne prisile, pa tudi preprečiti nova kazniva dejanja ali zmanjšati posledice prejšnjih kaznivih dejanj.
These personal rights of the protected person correspond to fundamental values recognised and upheld in all Member States.
Te osebne pravice zaščitene osebe ustrezajo temeljnim vrednotam, ki se priznavajo in podpirajo v vseh državah članicah.
However, a Member State is not obliged to issue a European protection order on the basis of a criminal measure which does not serve specifically to protect a person, but primarily serves other aims, for example the social rehabilitation of the offender.
Vendar država članica ni zavezana, da evropsko odredbo o zaščiti izda na podlagi kazenskega ukrepa, ki ne služi zaščiti osebe temveč primarno služi drugim ciljem, na primer socialni rehabilitaciji kršitelja.
It is important to underline that this Directive applies to protection measures which aim to protect all victims and not only the victims of gender violence, taking into account the specificities of each type of crime concerned.
Treba je poudariti, da se ta direktiva nanaša na zaščitne ukrepe, ki poskušajo zaščititi vse žrtve in ne le žrtve spolnega nasilja, ob upoštevanju specifičnosti vsake vrste kaznivega dejanja.
This Directive applies to protection measures adopted in criminal matters, and does not therefore cover protection measures adopted in civil matters.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za zaščitne ukrepe, sprejete v kazenskih zadevah, in tako ne zajema zaščitnih ukrepov, sprejetih v civilnih zadevah.
For a protection measure to be executable in accordance with this Directive, it is not necessary for a criminal offence to have been established by a final decision.
Da bi bil zaščitni ukrep v skladu s to direktivo izvršljiv, ni nujno, da je obstoj kaznivega dejanja ugotovljen s pravnomočno sodno odločbo.
Nor is the criminal, administrative or civil nature of the authority adopting a protection measure relevant.
Prav tako ni relevantna kazenska, upravna ali civilna narava organa, ki zaščitni ukrep sprejme.
This Directive does not oblige Member States to amend their national law to enable them to adopt protection measures in the context of criminal proceedings.
Ta direktiva držav članic ne obvezuje, da morajo spremeniti svoje nacionalno pravo, da bi lahko sprejemale zaščitne ukrepe v okviru kazenskih postopkov.
This Directive is intended to apply to protection measures adopted in favour of victims, or possible victims, of crimes.
Namen te direktive je, da se uporablja za zaščitne ukrepe, sprejete v korist žrtev ali morebitnih žrtev kaznivih dejanj.
This Directive should not therefore apply to measures adopted with a view to witness protection.
Ta direktiva se zato ne bi smela uporabljati za ukrepe, sprejete z namenom zaščite prič.
If a protection measure, as defined in this Directive, is adopted for the protection of a relative of the main protected person, a European protection order may also be requested by and issued in respect of that relative, subject to the conditions laid down in this Directive.
Če je zaščitni ukrep, kakor je opredeljen v tej direktivi, sprejet za zaščito sorodnika glavne zaščitene osebe, lahko ob upoštevanju pogojev iz te direktive ta sorodnik zaprosi za evropsko odredbo o zaščiti zaprosi in se lahko ta zanj izda.
Any request for the issuing of a European protection order should be treated with appropriate speed, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case, including the urgency of the matter, the date foreseen for the arrival of the protected person on the territory of the executing State and, where possible, the degree of risk for the protected person.
Vsako zaprosilo za izdajo evropske odredbe o zaščiti bi bilo treba obravnavati ustrezno hitro, pri tem pa upoštevati konkretne okoliščine primera, med drugim njegovo nujnost, predvideni datum prihoda zaščitene osebe na ozemlje države izvršitve in, če je možno, stopnjo ogroženosti zaščitene osebe.
Where information is to be provided under this Directive to the protected person or to the person causing danger, this information should also, where relevant, be provided to the guardian or the representative of the person concerned.
Kadar se informacije na podlagi te direktive posredujejo zaščiteni osebi ali osebi, ki povzroča nevarnost, bi bilo treba te informacije posredovati tudi skrbniku oziroma zastopniku zadevne osebe, če je to ustrezno.
Due attention should also be paid to the need for the protected person, the person causing danger or the guardian or representative in the proceedings, to receive the information provided for by this Directive, in a language that that person understands.
Ustrezno pozornost bi bilo treba nameniti tudi potrebi, da so zaščitena oseba, oseba, ki povzroča nevarnost, ali skrbnik oziroma zastopnik v jeziku, ki ga razumejo, seznanjeni z informacijami, ki jih določa ta direktiva.
In the procedures for the issuing and recognition of a European protection order, competent authorities should give appropriate consideration to the needs of victims, including particularly vulnerable persons, such as minors or persons with disabilities.
Pristojni organi bi morali v postopkih za izdajo in priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti ustrezno pozornost nameniti potrebam žrtev in še zlasti ranljivih oseb, kot so mladoletniki ali invalidi.
For the application of this Directive, a protection measure may have been imposed following a judgment within the meaning of Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions [3], or following a decision on supervision measures within the meaning of Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention [4].
Za uporabo te direktive je bil morda odrejen zaščitni ukrep na podlagi sodbe, v smislu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/947/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in pogojnih odločb zaradi zagotavljanja nadzorstva nad spremljevalnimi ukrepi in alternativnimi sankcijami [3], ali na podlagi odločbe o nadzornih ukrepih v smislu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2009/829/PNZ z dne 23. oktobra 2009 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb o nadzornih ukrepih med državami članicami Evropske unije kot alternativi začasnemu priporu [4].
If a decision was adopted in the issuing State on the basis of one of those Framework Decisions, the recognition procedure should be followed accordingly in the executing State.
Če je bila odločba v državi izdaje sprejeta na podlagi enega od navedenih okvirnih sklepov, bi morala država izvršitve ustrezno izvesti postopek za njeno priznanje.
This, however, should not exclude the possibility to transfer a European protection order to a Member State other than the State executing decisions based on those Framework Decisions.
Vendar to ne bi smelo izključevati možnosti posredovanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti državi članici, ki ni država, ki izvršuje odločbe na podlagi navedenih okvirnih sklepov.
In accordance with Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and with the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the person causing danger should be provided, either during the procedure leading to the adoption of a protection measure or before issuing a European protection order, with the possibility of being heard and challenging the protection measure.
V skladu s členom 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter drugim odstavkom člena 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah bi bilo treba osebi, ki povzroča nevarnost, dati možnost zaslišanja in izpodbijanja zaščitnega ukrepa, bodisi med postopkom, ki vodi do sprejetja zaščitnega ukrepa, bodisi pred izdajo evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
In order to prevent a crime being committed against the victim in the executing State, that State should have the legal means for recognising the decision previously adopted in the issuing State in favour of the victim, while also avoiding the need for the victim to start new proceedings or to produce evidence in the executing State again, as if the issuing State had not adopted the decision.
Da bi se preprečilo, da bi bilo proti žrtvi v državi izvršitve storjeno kaznivo dejanje, bi morala imeti ta država na voljo pravna sredstva za priznanje odločbe, ki je bila predhodno sprejeta v korist žrtve v državi izdaje, hkrati pa tudi preprečiti, da bi morala žrtev sprožiti nov postopek ali ponovno predložiti dokaze v državi izvršitve, kot če država izdaje ne bi sprejela odločbe.
The recognition of the European protection order by the executing State implies, inter alia, that the competent authority of that State, subject to the limitations set out in this Directive, accepts the existence and validity of the protection measure adopted in the issuing State, acknowledges the factual situation described in the European protection order, and agrees that protection should be provided and should continue to be provided in accordance with its national law.
Priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti s strani države izvršitve med drugim pomeni, da pristojni organ te države ob upoštevanju omejitev iz te direktive sprejema obstoj in veljavnost zaščitnega ukrepa, sprejetega v državi izdaje, prizna dejansko stanje, opisano v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, in soglaša, da bi bilo treba zagotoviti zaščito in da bi jo tudi bilo treba neprekinjeno zagotavljati v skladu z njenim nacionalnim pravom.
This Directive contains an exhaustive list of prohibitions and restrictions which, when imposed in the issuing State and included in the European protection order, should be recognised and enforced in the executing State, subject to the limitations set out in this Directive.
Ta direktiva vsebuje izčrpen seznam prepovedi in omejitev, ki bi, če bi bile izrečene v državi izdaje in vključene v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, morale biti priznane in izvršene v državi izvršitve ob upoštevanju omejitev iz te direktive.
Other types of protection measures may exist at national level, such as, if provided by national law, the obligation on the person causing danger to remain in a specified place.
Na nacionalni ravni lahko obstajajo tudi druge vrste zaščitnih ukrepov, kot je, če to predpisuje nacionalno pravo, obveznost osebe, ki povzroča nevarnost, da ostane v določenem kraju.
Such measures may be imposed in the issuing State in the framework of the procedure leading to the adoption of one of the protection measures which, according to this Directive, may be the basis for a European protection order.
Takšne ukrepe lahko izreče država izdaje v okviru postopka, ki vodi do sprejetja enega od zaščitnih ukrepov, ki je lahko v skladu s to direktivo podlaga za evropsko odredbo o zaščiti.
Since, in the Member States, different kinds of authorities (civil, criminal or administrative) are competent to adopt and enforce protection measures, it is appropriate to provide a high degree of flexibility in the cooperation mechanism between the Member States under this Directive.
Ker so v državah članicah za sprejetje in izvrševanje zaščitnih ukrepov pristojne različne vrste organov (civilni, kazenski ali upravni), se zdi primerno, da se v mehanizmu sodelovanja med državami članicami v okviru te direktive zagotovi visoka stopnja prožnosti.
Therefore, the competent authority in the executing State is not required in all cases to take the same protection measure as those which were adopted in the issuing State, and has a degree of discretion to adopt any measure which it deems adequate and appropriate under its national law in a similar case in order to provide continued protection to the protected person in the light of the protection measure adopted in the issuing State as described in the European protection order.
Pristojnemu organu države izvršitve zato ni treba v vseh primerih sprejeti enakega zaščitnega ukrepa, kot je bil sprejet v državi izdaje, in ima določeno stopnjo diskrecije, da sprejme kakršni koli ukrep, za katerega meni, da je v podobnem primeru v skladu z nacionalnim pravom ustrezen in primeren za zagotavljanje neprekinjene zaščite zaščitene osebe z vidika zaščitnega ukrepa, sprejetega v državi izdaje in opisanega v evropski odredbi o zaščiti.
The prohibitions or restrictions to which this Directive applies include, among others, measures aimed at limiting personal or remote contacts between the protected person and the person causing danger, for example by imposing certain conditions on such contacts or imposing restrictions on the contents of communications.
Prepovedi ali omejitve, za katere se ta direktiva uporablja, med drugim obsegajo ukrepe, katerih cilj je omejitev osebnih stikov ali stikov na daljavo med zaščiteno osebo in osebo, ki povzroča nevarnost, kot sta to določitev nekaterih pogojev glede takšnih stikov ali omejitev vsebine komunikacije.
The competent authority of the executing State should inform the person causing danger, the competent authority of the issuing State and the protected person of any measure adopted on the basis of the European protection order.
Pristojni organ države izvršitve bi moral obvestiti osebo, ki povzroča nevarnost, pristojni organ države izdaje in zaščiteno osebo o vsakem ukrepu, sprejetem na podlagi evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
In the notification to the person causing danger, due regard should be taken of the interest of the protected person in not having that person’s address or other contact details disclosed.
V uradnem obvestilu osebi, ki povzroča nevarnost, bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati interes zaščitene osebe, da se ne razkrije njenega naslova ali drugih kontaktnih podatkov.
Such details should be excluded from the notification, provided that the address or other contact details are not included in the prohibition or restriction imposed as an enforcement measure on the person causing danger.
Takšne podatke bi bilo treba izločiti iz uradnega obvestila, pod pogojem, da naslov ali drugi kontaktni podatki niso del prepovedi ali omejitve, ki je kot izvršilni ukrep izrečena zoper osebo, ki povzroča nevarnost.
When the competent authority in the issuing State withdraws the European protection order, the competent authority in the executing State should discontinue the measures which it has adopted in order to enforce the European protection order, it being understood that the competent authority in the executing State may — autonomously, and in accordance with its national law — adopt any protection measure under its national law in order to protect the person concerned.
Če pristojni organ države izdaje umakne evropsko odredbo o zaščiti, bi moral pristojni organ države izvršitve prenehati izvajati ukrepe, ki jih je sprejel za izvrševanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, pri čemer se razume, da lahko pristojni organ v državi izvršitve, samostojno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, sprejme kakršen koli zaščitni ukrep na podlagi nacionalnega prava za zaščito zadevne osebe.