natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of SC, the applicant considers that the geographical market should be defined as comprising the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Poland, Hungary and Germany.
V primeru parnega premoga prosilec meni, da je treba geografski trg opredeliti tako, da vključuje Češko, Slovaško, Avstrijo, Poljsko, Madžarsko in Nemčijo.
It is argued that the main reason for this market definition is the important mutual cross-border supply, the customer switching and the non-existence of administrative obstacles (customs barriers, quotas, etc.).
Glavni razlog za to opredelitev trga naj bi bila pomembna medsebojna čezmejna oskrba, menjava dobavitelja in neobstoj upravnih ovir (carinske ovire, kvote itd.).
According to the application [5] the Czech Republic is a net exporter of both CSFC and SC.
V vlogi [5] je navedeno, da je Češka neto izvoznica obeh vrst premoga.
In 2009, the Czech Republic exported 3581 thousands tonnes CSFC and 2389 thousands tonnes SC [6] which accounts for around 61 % and 47 % of the respective internal production.
Češka je leta 2009 izvozila 3518000 ton premoga za koksanje in 2389000 ton parnega premoga [6], kar predstavlja približno 61 % oziroma 47 % domače proizvodnje.
In the same year, the imports into the Czech Republic accounted for 771 thousands tonnes CSFC and 954 thousands tonnes SC representing 13 % and 19 % respectively of the internal production [7] and the source of this imports was mainly Poland.
Uvoz premoga za koksanje na Češkem je v istem letu znašal 771000 ton, uvoz parnega premoga pa 954000 ton, kar predstavlja 13 % oziroma 19 % domače proizvodnje [7], pri čemer je bila vir tega uvoza predvsem Poljska.
In fact imports from Poland amounted to around 90 % for CSFC and 80 % for SC of total imports.
Uvoz premoga za koksanje s Poljske je dejansko predstavljal približno 90 %, uvoz parnega premoga pa 80 % skupnega uvoza.
Although the applicant states that the coal produced by OKD in the Czech Republic – whether CSFC or SC – is competitive for a radius of 500 km, it is noted that the customers of OKD are located on a radius of approximately 350 km from the place of production of the coal, in Ostrava.
Čeprav prosilec trdi, da je premog, ki ga je proizvedla družba OKD na Češkem, in sicer premog za koksanje ali parni premog, konkurenčen na območju s polmerom 500 km, se ugotavlja, da se odjemalci družbe OKD nahajajo znotraj območja s polmerom približno 350 km od mesta proizvodnje premoga v Ostravi.
In respect of CSFC sales, OKD has one important customer in Slovakia, which purchased around 26 % in 2007 and 30 % in 2009 of OKD production and another important customer in Austria, which purchased 13 % in 2007 and 19 % in 2009 of the OKD production.
Kar zadeva prodajo premoga za koksanje, ima družba OKD na Slovaškem enega pomembnega odjemalca, ki je leta 2007 kupil približno 26 % proizvodnje družbe OKD, leta 2009 pa 30 %, in še enega pomembnega odjemalca iz Avstrije, ki je leta 2007 kupil 13 % proizvodnje družbe OKD, leta 2009 pa 19 %.
The applicant lists also among its main customers outside the Czech Republic one company in Poland but its purchases account for only around 8 % of OKD production.
Prosilec med svojimi glavnimi odjemalci zunaj Češke navaja družbo s Poljske, vendar ta kupi le približno 8 % proizvodnje družbe OKD.
In respect of SC sales, apart from Czech customers, OKD lists one important customer in Austria, which accounted for around 12 % in 2007 and 21 % in 2009 of OKD sales and one customer in Germany with around 5 % in 2007 and 3 % in 2009 of SC sales.
Kar zadeva prodajo parnega premoga, ima družba OKD poleg odjemalcev s Češke enega pomembnega odjemalca iz Avstrije, ki je leta 2007 kupil približno 12 % prodaje družbe OKD, leta 2009 pa 21 %, ter še enega pomembnega odjemalca v Nemčiji s 5 % prodaje parnega premoga leta 2007 in 3 % leta 2009.
According to the application, ‘the three biggest competitors are heavily concentrated’ [8], and indeed this can be observed in all the national markets taken separately, both in respect of SC and CSFC.
V skladu z vlogo „so trije največji konkurenčni ponudniki močno zgoščeni“ [8], kar je mogoče opaziti na vseh nacionalnih trgih, obravnavanih ločeno, kar zadeva parni premog in premog za koksanje.
The applicant also acknowledges that ‘the overwhelming majority of extracted coal is consumed on the local market’ [9], and this is confirmed in all countries in the geographic area considered by the application which are producing bituminous coal (the Czech Republic, Poland, Germany).
Poleg tega prosilec priznava, da „se velika večina pridobljenega premoga porabi na lokalnem trgu“ [9], pri čemer to velja za vse države, ki proizvajajo bituminozni premog (Češka, Poljska in Nemčija) na geografskem območju, zajetem v vlogi.
According to the Commission Notice on the definition of the relevant market [10] the relevant geographic market comprises the area in which the conditions of competition are sufficiently homogeneous and which can be distinguished from neighbouring areas because the conditions of competition are appreciably different there.
V skladu z Obvestilom Komisije o opredelitvi upoštevnega trga [10] zajema zadevni geografski trg območje, kjer so konkurenčni pogoji dovolj enotni in ki ga je mogoče razlikovati od sosednjih območij, ker so tam konkurenčni pogoji bistveno drugačni.
It is therefore worth noting that the coastal regions of Central Europe (in particular northern Germany and northern Poland) are exposed to imports of sea borne coal and given, inter alia, that sea freight rates are considerably lower than the cost for land transport, conditions of competition may therefore be different in those areas [11].
Zato je treba poudariti, da so obalne regije v srednji Evropi (zlasti severna Nemčija in severna Poljska) izpostavljene uvozu morskega premoga in glede na to, da so stroški pomorskega prometa bistveno nižji od stroškov kopenskega prometa, so konkurenčni pogoji na teh območjih morda drugačni [11].
The application mentions that an important factor in determining the price of the coal is the stability and the security of supply, and the duration of the contract [12], and that generally the contracts for supply of coal, whether SC or CSFC, are long-term contracts.
V vlogi je navedeno, da so pomemben dejavnik pri določanju cene premoga stabilnost in varnost dobave, trajanje pogodbe [12] ter dejstvo, da so pogodbe o dobavi premoga za koksanje ali parnega premoga običajno dolgoročne.
The customers of bituminous coal in the Czech Republic are buying coal from OKD or, in limited quantities, from Polish companies.
Odjemalci bituminoznega premoga na Češkem kupujejo premog pri družbi OKD ali v omejenih količinah pri poljskih družbah.
The imports from other countries, although increasing, are not very significant to date [13].
Uvoz iz drugih držav do zdaj ni bil zelo obsežen, čeprav se povečuje [13].
In view of the above factors, for the purposes of evaluating the conditions laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC, the geographical market is considered to be confined to the Czech Republic and Poland, both in respect of SC and CSFC.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih dejavnikov in za namene ocenjevanja pogojev iz člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES je geografski trg za parni premog in premog za koksanje omejen na Češko in Poljsko.
Due to the abovementioned differences between those regions which can be easily supplied by sea borne coal and those which might be too far away from any coast, the market could even be smaller comprising only the Czech Republic and the south of Poland.
Zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlik med regijami, ki se lahko enostavno oskrbujejo z morskim premogom, in regijami, ki so morda preveč oddaljene od obale, je lahko trg celo manjši in zajema le Češko in jug Poljske.
The question can, however, be left open, since the larger market definition is the one more favourable to the applicant.
Vprašanje lahko kljub temu ostane odprto, ker je opredelitev širšega trga ugodnejša za prosilca.
Under both market definitions, the analysis does not lead to a different outcome.
V skladu z obema opredelitvama trga analiza ne prinaša drugačnega rezultata.
It is considered that, in respect of bituminous coal mining, one indicator for the degree of competition on national markets is the total market share of the biggest three producers.
Obravnava se, da je pri kopanju bituminoznega premoga eden od kazalnikov stopnje konkurence na nacionalnih trgih skupni tržni delež treh največjih proizvajalcev.
CSFC Market
Trg s premogom za koksanje
OKD and two Polish suppliers of CSFC are by far the most important suppliers in the relevant geographic market.
Družba OKD in dva poljska dobavitelja premoga za koksanje so najpomembnejši dobavitelji na zadevnem geografskem trgu.
OKD is the largest supplier of CSFC in the Czech Republic (75,5 % market share in the Czech Republic in 2008).
Družba OKD je največja dobaviteljica premoga za koksanje na Češkem (75,5-odstotni tržni delež na Češkem leta 2008).
The two Polish suppliers of CSFC are the largest suppliers in Poland (60,2 % and 19,3 % market share in Poland in 2008).
Dva poljska dobavitelja premoga za koksanje sta največja dobavitelja na Poljskem (60,2-odstotni in 19,3-odstotni tržni delež na Poljskem leta 2008).
In the geographical market encompassing the Czech Republic and Poland, the aggregated market share of the three biggest producers in 2008 was around 93 %.
Na geografskem trgu, ki zajema Češko in Poljsko, so imeli trije največji proizvajalci leta 2008 približno 93-odstotni tržni delež.
It is also worth noting that the biggest competitor of OKD has on its own a market share of around 49 % of the market.
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da ima največji konkurenčni ponudnik družbe OKD sam približno 49-odstotni tržni delež.
Even considering a larger market, comprising the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Poland and Hungary, as claimed by the applicant, the aggregated market shares of the three biggest competitors would still be very high (91,3 % in 2005, 87,7 % in 2006, 85 % in 2007 and 86,6 % in 2008 [14]) and cannot constitute indication of sufficient exposure to competition of the CSFC market.
Kljub upoštevanju širšega trga, ki zajema Češko, Slovaško, Avstrijo, Poljsko in Madžarsko, kot trdi prosilec, bi bili skupni tržni deleži treh največjih konkurenčnih ponudnikov še vedno zelo veliki (91,3 % leta 2005, 87,7 % leta 2006, 85 % leta 2007 in 86,6 % leta 2008 [14]) ter ne morejo pomeniti zadostne izpostavljenosti konkurenci na trgu s premogom za koksanje.
As recalled in recital 22 the security and the stability of supply play an important role in the contractual relationships.
Kot je poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi 22, imata varnost in stabilnost dobave pomembno vlogo pri pogodbenih razmerjih.
The information provided by the applicant on the customer switching for CSFC shows that there is virtually no switching for this product.
Informacije o menjavi dobavitelja premoga za koksanje, ki jih je predložil prosilec, kažejo, da menjav za ta proizvod praktično ni.
The contracts for CSFC supply are long-term contracts and no evidence has been provided to show that any of OKD customers changed from OKD to other suppliers.
Pogodbe o dobavi premoga za koksanje so dolgoročne, pri čemer ni bilo predloženih dokazov, na podlagi katerih bi se ugotovilo, da je posamezen odjemalec družbe OKD zamenjal dobavitelja.
It can consequently not be assumed that a CSFC customer would be willing or indeed able to easily switch in the event of a small but significant increase of price by OKD.
Zato ni mogoče domnevati, da bi bil odjemalec premoga za koksanje pripravljen zamenjati dobavitelja ali da bi bila preprosta zamenjava dejansko mogoča, če bi družba OKD nekoliko povečala ceno, pri čemer bi imelo to povečanje velik učinek.
SC market
Trg s parnim premogom
OKD and two Polish suppliers of SC are the by far most important producers of SC in the relevant geographic market.
Družba OKD in dva poljska dobavitelja parnega premoga so najpomembnejši proizvajalci parnega premoga na zadevnem geografskem trgu.
OKD is the largest supplier of SC in the Czech Republic (61,6 % market share in the Czech Republic in 2008).
Družba OKD je največja dobaviteljica parnega premoga na Češkem (61,6-odstotni tržni delež na Češkem leta 2008).
Two Polish suppliers of SC are the largest suppliers in Poland (52,5 % and 17,7 % market share in Poland in 2008).
Dva poljska dobavitelja parnega premoga sta največja dobavitelja na Poljskem (52,5-odstotni in 17,7-odstotni tržni delež na Poljskem leta 2008).
Moreover, on all three geographical markets for SC mentioned in recital 29 (the Czech Republic alone, Poland alone and a geographical market encompassing both) there is an economic operator which on his own has a market share of around 50 % or more.
Poleg tega je na vseh treh geografskih trgih za parni premog, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 29 (sama Češka, sama Poljska in geografski trg, ki zajema obe državi), nosilec gospodarske dejavnosti, ki ima sam približno 50-odstotni ali večji tržni delež.
A constant jurisprudence should consequently be recalled in this context [15], according to which ‘very large market shares are in themselves, save in exceptional circumstances, evidence of the existence of a dominant position.
V zvezi s tem je treba zato opozoriti na stalno sodno prakso [15], ki določa, da „so zelo visoki tržni deleži sami po sebi, razen v izjemnih razmerah, dokaz o obstoju prevladujočega položaja.
Even considering a larger market than national, comprising the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Poland, Hungary and Germany, as claimed by the applicant, the aggregated market shares of the three biggest competitors would still be rather high (62,7 % in 2005, 60,2 % in 2006, 56,9 % in 2007 and 57,3 % in 2008 [16]).
Tudi če bi se upošteval širši trg od nacionalnega, pri čemer bi ta trg zajemal Češko, Slovaško, Avstrijo, Poljsko, Madžarsko in Nemčijo, kot trdi prosilec, bi bili skupni tržni deleži treh največjih konkurenčnih ponudnikov še vedno precej veliki (62,7 % leta 2005, 60,2 % leta 2006, 56,9 % leta 2007 in 57,3 % leta 2008 [16]).
As is the case for CSFC, the security and stability of supply of SC play an important role in the contractual relationships.
Kot velja za premog za koksanje, imata varnost in stabilnost dobave parnega premoga pomembno vlogo pri pogodbenih razmerjih.
The information provided by the applicant on the customer switching shows that a number of OKD customers of SC are interrupting their supplies from OKD, in certain years, or that some 1-year contracts or on-the-spot contracts were never renewed.
Informacije o menjavi dobavitelja, ki jih je predložil prosilec, kažejo, da je v nekaterih letih več odjemalcev parnega premoga pri družbi OKD prekinilo dobavno pogodbo z družbo OKD ali da nekatere enoletne pogodbe ali pogodbe, sklenjene na kraju samem, niso bile nikoli obnovljene.
However, given the fact that the applicant did not, as requested, provide information on the volumes of supplies concerned or of their proportion of the OKD production, it would be difficult to conclude that a customer of OKD would easily switch, following a small but significant increase of price by OKD.
Vendar bi bilo ob upoštevanju, da prosilec ni predložil informacij o obsegu zadevne dobave ali njegovem deležu proizvodnje družbe OKD, kot se je zahtevalo, težko sklepati, da bi odjemalec družbe OKD preprosto zamenjal dobavitelja, če bi družba OKD nekoliko povečala ceno, pri čemer bi imelo to povečanje velik učinek.
In respect of bituminous coal mining in the Czech Republic, the situation can thus be summarised as follows: in respect of both SC and CSFC, the aggregate market shares of the three biggest competitors on the geographical market as defined for the purposes of this decision are high, and more importantly, the biggest producer on its own represents a market share of almost 50 %, the markets should therefore be considered as being heavily concentrated and as recalled in recital 20, the overwhelming majority of extracted coal is consumed on the local market.
V zvezi s kopanjem bituminoznega premoga na Češkem se lahko položaj povzame na naslednji način: kar zadeva parni premog in premog za koksanje, so skupni tržni deleži treh največjih konkurenčnih ponudnikov na geografskem trgu, opredeljenem za namene tega sklepa, veliki, pri čemer ima, kar je pomembnejše, največji proizvajalec sam skoraj 50-odstotni tržni delež, zato je treba trge obravnavati kot močno koncentrirane, velika večina pridobljenega premoga pa se porabi na lokalnem trgu, kot je poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi 20.
The information on the degree of switching does not support the conclusion that a bituminous coal customer would have the will or possibility to easily switch supplier in the event of a small but significant price increase.
Na podlagi informacij o stopnji menjave dobavitelja ni mogoče ugotoviti, da bi bil odjemalec bituminoznega premoga pripravljen zamenjati dobavitelja ali da bi bila zamenjava mogoča, če bi se cena nekoliko povečala, pri čemer bi imelo to povečanje velik učinek.
The applicant also acknowledged that, since the bituminous coal mining is not profitable in other places than those already exploited (notably those exploited by OKD), ‘access of another entity to the Czech market is not realistic and has not taken place during the last five years’ [17].
Ker je kopanje bituminoznega premoga donosno le na lokacijah, ki se že izkoriščajo (zlasti lokacije, ki jih izkorišča družba OKD), je prosilec tudi priznal, da „vstop drugega subjekta na češki trg ni realen in se v zadnjih petih letih ni zgodil“ [17].
The same holds in respect of coal supplies, where the applicant states that he is not aware of any significant access to the Czech market, and most of the significant wholesale customers concluded long-term contracts [18].
Enako velja za dobavo premoga, v zvezi s katero prosilec trdi, da ni seznanjen z nobenim pomembnejšim vstopom na češki trg, pri čemer je večina pomembnih grosističnih odjemalcev sklenila dolgoročne pogodbe [18].
In view of the factors examined in recitals 8 to 34, it should be concluded that the market for mining bituminous coal, both CSFC and SC, is currently not directly exposed to competition in the Czech Republic.
Glede na preučene dejavnike iz uvodnih izjav 8 do 34 je mogoče sklepati, da trg za kopanje bituminoznega premoga, in sicer premoga za koksanje in parnega premoga, na Češkem trenutno ni neposredno izpostavljen konkurenci.
Consequently, Directive 2004/17/EC continues to apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable bituminous coal mining to be carried out in the Czech Republic or when they organise design contests for the pursuit of such activities in the Czech Republic.
Zato se Direktiva 2004/17/ES še naprej uporablja, kadar naročniki oddajo naročila za omogočanje kopanja bituminoznega premoga na Češkem ali kadar organizirajo natečaje za izvajanje takšnih dejavnosti v tej državi.
This Decision is based on the legal and factual situation as of November 2010 to March 2011 as it appears from the information submitted by the Czech Republic.
Ta sklep temelji na pravnem in dejanskem stanju v obdobju od novembra 2010 do marca 2011, kot je razvidno iz informacij, ki jih je predložila Češka.
It may be revised, should significant changes in the legal or factual situation mean that the conditions for the applicability of Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC are met.
Spremeni se lahko, če bi pomembne spremembe pravnega ali dejanskega stanja pomenile, da so pogoji za uporabo člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES izpolnjeni.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Advisory Committee for Public Contracts,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Svetovalnega odbora za javna naročila –
Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable to bituminous coal mining in the Czech Republic.
Člen 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES se ne uporablja pri kopanju bituminoznega premoga na Češkem.
Consequently, Directive 2004/17/EC shall continue to apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable them to carry out such activities in the Czech Republic.
Zato se Direktiva 2004/17/ES še naprej uporablja za naročila, ki naročnikom omogočajo izvajanje tovrstnih dejavnosti na Češkem.
In line with the Commission’s constant practice (e.g.: Commission Decision 2009/47/EC (OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 57), Commission Decision 2010/192/EU (OJ L 84, 31.3.2010, p. 52), etc.).
V skladu s stalno prakso Komisije (npr. Odločba Komisije 2009/47/ES (UL L 19, 23.1.2009, str. 57), Sklep Komisije 2010/192/EU (UL L 84, 31.3.2010, str. 52) itd.).
See page 21 of the application: ‘[…] there is no market of the bituminous coal mining, the market can be conceptually defined only in the next phase when the producers sell the coal mined’.
Glej stran 21 vloge: „[…] trg za kopanje bituminoznega premoga ne obstaja, trg se lahko konceptualno opredeli le v naslednji fazi, ko proizvajalci izkopani premog prodajajo“.
See, inter alia, Commission Decision of 29 September 1999 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement (Case IV/M.1532 BP Amoco/Arco), point 14.
Glej zlasti Odločbo Komisije z dne 29. septembra 1999 o združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom in sporazumom EGP (zadeva IV/M.1532 BP Amoco/Arco), točka 14.
See table 2 on page 39 of the application.
Glej preglednico 2 na strani 39 vloge.
European Commission General Directorate for Energy and Transport, Coal and Oil Market Observatory – Supplies and requirements of solid fuels in 2009 in the Czech Republic.
Generalni direktorat Evropske komisije za energetiko in promet, Observatorij za trg s premogom in nafto – Dobava in zahteve za trda goriva na Češkem za leto 2009.
Idem 5.
Prav tam 5.
See application, page 23, paragraph 6.
Glej vlogo, stran 23, odstavek 6.
See Commission Notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law (OJ C 372, 9.12.1997, p. 5).
Glej Obvestilo Komisije o opredelitvi upoštevnega trga za namene konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti (UL C 372, 9.12.1997, str. 5).
See application, page 14, paragraph 4.
Glej vlogo, stran 14, odstavek 4.
See application, page 8, paragraph 3.
Glej vlogo, stran 8, odstavek 3.
In 2009, CSFC imports from USA represented around 1 % of the consumption and the imports of SC from Russia represented around 6 % of the consumption.
Uvoz premoga za koksanje iz ZDA je leta 2009 predstavljal približno 1 % porabe, uvoz parnega premoga iz Rusije pa približno 6 % porabe.
In 2010, according to still provisional data in the letter of the applicant of 9.2.2011, the share of imports of CSFC from USA rose to 3 % of the consumption and the share of imports of SC from Russia rose to 12 % of the internal consumption.
V skladu s še vedno začasnimi podatki iz dopisa prosilca z dne 9. februarja 2011 se je delež uvoza premoga za koksanje iz ZDA leta 2010 povečal na 3 % porabe, delež uvoza parnega premoga iz Rusije pa na 12 % domače porabe.
See table on page 58 of the application.
Glej preglednico na strani 58 vloge.
See table on page 59 of the application.
Glej preglednico na strani 59 vloge.
See paragraph 5, on page 62, of the application.
Glej odstavek 5 na strani 62 vloge.
See paragraph 6, on page 62 of the application.
Glej odstavek 6 na strani 62 vloge.
The Commission requested additional information by e-mail of 21 January 2011.
Komisija je v elektronski pošti z dne 21. januarja 2011 zahtevala dodatne informacije.
The reply to the request for information was transmitted by the Czech authorities by e-mail of 9 February 2011.
Češki organi so odgovor na zahtevo po informacijah poslali po elektronski pošti 9. februarja 2011.
The request was accompanied by a letter from an independent national authority, (Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže, the Czech Office for the Protection of Competition) in the form of a preliminary opinion, dated 7 November 2008.
Zahtevku je bil priložen dopis neodvisnega nacionalnega organa (Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže, tj. češki urad za varstvo konkurence) v obliki predhodnega mnenja z dne 7. novembra 2008.
The Czech Office for the Protection of Competition analysed the conditions of access to the relevant market and found it to be unrestricted.
Češki urad za varstvo konkurence je analiziral pogoje za dostop do zadevnega trga in ugotovil, da je ta neomejen.