natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, even though cooperation was high, the cooperating producers/exporters did not completely cover the overall export volume of SWR from the Republic of Korea.
Čeprav je bila raven sodelovanja visoka, sodelujoči proizvajalci/izvozniki niso v celoti pokrivali celotnega obsega izvoza JŽV iz Republike Koreje.
The overall export volumes were thus based on Comext.
Zato je bil celotni obseg izvoza določen na podlagi podatkov COMEXT.
There are two known producers in Malaysia.
V Maleziji sta dva znana proizvajalca.
The total export quantities of the two cooperating companies in Malaysia exceeded the import volume of the product under investigation recorded in Comext.
Celotna izvožena količina obeh sodelujočih družb iz Malezije je presegala obseg uvoza izdelka v preiskavi, evidentiranega v bazi COMEXT.
Therefore the exporting producers were considered to be reflecting the total exports of SWR from Malaysia to the Union.
Zato se je štelo, da proizvajalca izvoznika pomenita celoten izvoz JŽV iz Malezije v Unijo.
The applicant claimed that Comext data were unreliable and therefore total export volumes from Malaysia to the Union should not be determined on this basis.
Vložnik je trdil, da podatki COMEXT niso zanesljivi in da se zato celotni obseg izvoza iz Malezije v Unijo ne bi smel določati na tej podlagi.
However, during the investigation, import data were counter checked with Malaysian official statistics and with the verified questionnaire replies.
Vendar so bili med preiskavo podatki o uvozu navzkrižno preverjeni z malezijskimi uradnimi statističnimi podatki in preverjenimi izpolnjenimi vprašalniki.
This analysis did not reveal that actual exports from Malaysia exceeded the exports reported by the cooperating Malaysian companies.
Ta analiza ni pokazala, da dejanski izvoz iz Malezije presega količino izvoza, ki so jo sporočile sodelujoče malezijske družbe.
The applicant’s argument had therefore to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba trditev vložnika zavrniti.
There was a low level of cooperation by producers/exporters in the PRC, with only three exporters/producers submitting a questionnaire reply.
Sodelovanje proizvajalcev/izvoznikov iz LRK je bilo na nizki ravni, saj so le trije izvozniki/proizvajalci vrnili izpolnjene vprašalnike.
Moreover, none of those companies exported the product concerned to the Union and only in very minor quantities to Malaysia.
Poleg tega nobena od teh družb ni izvažala zadevnega izdelka v Unijo ali Malezijo.
The exports of the cooperating companies covered 41 % of the total Chinese exports to the Republic of Korea.
Izvoz sodelujočih družb je zajemal 41 % celotnega kitajskega izvoza v Republiko Korejo.
Therefore, on the basis of the information submitted by the cooperating parties no reasonable determination could be made as to export volumes of SWR from the PRC.
Zato na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložile sodelujoče strani, ni bilo mogoče smiselno določiti obsega izvoza JŽV iz LRK.
Given the above, findings in respect of imports of SWR into the Union and exports of SWR from the PRC to the Republic of Korea and Malaysia had to be made partially on the basis of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bilo treba ugotovitve v zvezi z uvozom JŽV v Unijo ter izvozom JŽV iz LRK v Republiko Korejo in Malezijo delno sprejeti na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Comext data was used to determine overall import volumes from the PRC to the Union.
Celoten obseg uvoza iz LRK v Unijo se je določil na podlagi podatkov COMEXT.
Chinese, Korean and Malaysian national statistics were used for the determination of the overall imports to the Republic of Korea and Malaysia from the PRC.
Celoten uvoz iz LRK v Republiko Korejo in Malezijo se je določil na podlagi podatkov iz nacionalnih statističnih podatkov Kitajske, Republike Koreje in Malezije.
Data were cross-checked among the different statistical sources and confirmed by other statistical databases such as the Global Trade Atlas, China Export Database and the data provided by the customs authorities of the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.
Podatki iz različnih statističnih virov so se navzkrižno preverili in potrdili z drugimi statističnimi podatkovnimi zbirkami, kot so Atlas svetovne trgovine (Global Trade Atlas), in Podatkovna zbirka kitajskega izvoza, ter podatki, ki so jih zagotovili carinski organi Republike Koreje in Malezije.
The import volume recorded in Korean, Malaysian and Chinese statistics covered a larger product group than the product concerned or the product under investigation.
Obseg uvoza, evidentiran v korejskih, malezijskih in kitajskih statističnih podatkih, je vključeval skupino izdelkov, ki je večja od zadevnega izdelka in izdelka v preiskavi.
Therefore, the statistics were adjusted accordingly based on the findings of the present investigation.
Zato so se statistični podatki prilagodili glede na ugotovitve te preiskave.
Imports of SWR into the Union
Uvoz JŽV v Unijo
On the other hand, total imports of Korean SWR to the Union have increased significantly between 1999 and 2008 from approximately 11123 tonnes to 48214 tonnes.
Po drugi strani pa se je skupni korejski uvoz JŽV v Unijo med letoma 1999 in 2008 znatno povečal, in sicer s približno 11123 ton na 48214 ton.
The yearly increase in absolute terms was the most significant in the years 2002 and 2003 and more recently in 2006 and 2007.
Letno povečanje v absolutnem smislu je bilo največje v letih 2002 in 2003, nato pa v letih 2006 in 2007.
Based on information in the complaint and that provided by the Mission of the Republic of Korea to the European Union, the present investigation is considered to have covered the vast majority, if not all, of the genuine producers of the product under investigation in Korea.
Na podlagi informacij iz pritožbe in podatkov, ki jih je predložila Misija Republike Koreje pri Evropski uniji, lahko velja, da je bila s to preiskavo zajeta velika večina dejanskih proizvajalcev izdelka v preiskavi v Koreji, če ne vsi.
Therefore it was considered that the exports by non-cooperating Korean companies to the Union, which represented approximately 19 % of the total exports in terms of quantity from the Republic of Korea, are, apart from the producers mentioned in recitals 18 and 47, mainly exported by traders.
Zato se je štelo, da so izvoz nesodelujočih korejskih družb v Unijo, ki je pomenil približno 19 % celotnega izvoza v smislu količine iz Republike Koreje, poleg proizvajalcev iz uvodnih izjav 18 in 47 izvozili predvsem trgovci.
Exports of the non-cooperating companies have been diminishing as from 2008 which is to be seen in light of the investigation of the Korean authorities in this period as described in recital 52.
Izvoz nesodelujočih družb se je po letu 2008 zmanjševal, kar je treba upoštevati glede na preiskavo korejskih organov v tem obdobju, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 52.
As far as Malaysia is concerned, both Comext data and the total export of the cooperating companies show that exports from Malaysia to the Union have also been continuously increasing in the past.
Za Malezijo podatki COMEXT in podatki o skupnem izvozu sodelujočih družb kažejo, da se je v preteklosti uvoz iz Malezije v Unijo prav tako nenehno povečeval.
The increase was the most significant and steady between 2005 and the IP when Malaysian exports to the Union doubled.
Povečanje je bilo najpomembnejše in najbolj enakomerno med letom 2005 in OP, ko se je malezijski izvoz v Unijo podvojil.
Table 1 shows import quantities of SWR from the abovementioned countries into the Union since the imposition of the measures in 1999 until the IP:
Razpredelnica 1 kaže uvožene količine JŽV iz zgoraj navedenih držav v Unijo od uvedbe ukrepov leta 1999 do OP.
Evolution of imports of SWR to the Union since the imposition of the measures
Razvoj uvoza JŽV v Unijo po uvedbi ukrepov
Source: Comext, Korean statistics (KITA)
Vir: COMEXT, korejski statistični podatki (KITA).
Import volumes given in tonnes
Obseg uvoza v tonah
Share of total imports
Delež celotnega uvoza
Korean non-cooperating companies
Korejske nesodelujoče družbe
Malaysian cooperating companies (index, 2006 = 100)
Malezijske sodelujoče družbe (indeks, 2006 = 100)
Looking at the pattern of the above three trade flows, it can be observed that particularly since 2005, Korean exporters and partly Malaysian exporters have significantly outsold and to some extent replaced Chinese exporters on the Union market in terms of volume.
Na podlagi vzorca navedenih treh trgovinskih tokov je mogoče ugotoviti, da so korejski in delno malezijski izvozniki zlasti po letu 2005 na trgu Unije po količini prodali znatno več kot kitajski in so jih deloma nadomestili.
Due to the global economic slowdown which coincides with the IP, traded volumes of SWR have decreased or the increase has slowed down between all countries concerned.
Količine JŽV, s katerimi so trgovale vse zadevne države, so se zaradi gospodarske recesije, ki sovpada z OP, zmanjšale ali pa se je povečevanje upočasnilo.
The decrease was however the most significant in the case of imports from the PRC to the Union (– 27 %).
Zmanjšanje je bilo vsekakor najopaznejše pri uvozu iz LRK v Unijo (– 27 %).
Chinese exports to the Republic of Korea and Malaysia
Kitajski izvoz v Republiko Korejo in Malezijo
Import of Chinese products into the Republic of Korea between 1999 and the IP
Uvoz kitajskih izdelkov v Republiko Korejo med letom 1999 in OP
Source: Korean statistics (KITA), data provided by the Korean Customs Services, verified information provided by the cooperating producers
Vir: Korejski statistični podatki (KITA), podatki, ki so jih predložile korejske carinske službe, preverjene informacije, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci.
Import (tonnes, all diameters)
Uvoz (v tonah, ne glede na prečni prerez)
Yearly change (%)
Letna sprememba (%)
Imports by Korean non-cooperating companies (tonnes, product concerned only)
Uvoz korejskih nesodelujočih družb (v tonah, samo za zadevni izdelek)
To establish the trend of the China to Malaysia trade flow of SWR, both Malaysian and Chinese statistics were considered.
Pri določitvi gibanja trgovinskega toka JŽV iz Kitajske v Malezijo so se upoštevali malezijski in kitajski statistični podatki.
Both of these data are only available at a higher product group level than the product concerned.
Podatkih iz teh dveh virov pa so na voljo samo na ravni skupine izdelkov, ki je presega raven zadevnega izdelka.
Furthermore they showed considerable differences.
Poleg tega so bili podatki tudi dokaj različni.
Therefore, no reliable data could be established in this regard.
Zato v zvezi s tem ni bilo mogoče določiti zanesljivih podatkov.
The applicant claimed that the fact that no reliable data could be established would not be sufficient to conclude that no circumvention took place.
Vložnik je trdil, da dejstvo, da ni bilo mogoče določiti zanesljivih podatkov, ni dovolj za sklep, da izogibanja ni bilo.
As outlined in recitals 38 and 55, the evidence available in the current investigation, i.e. in particular production volume of the cooperating Malaysian exporting producers as well as their export sales to the Union showed that exports of SWR from Malaysia were of genuine Malaysian origin and therefore did not constitute circumvention.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 38 in 55, so dokazi, ki so bili na voljo v sedanji preiskavi, zlasti celotni obseg proizvodnje sodelujočih malezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ter njihov izvoz v Unijo pokazali, da je bil izvoz JŽV iz Malezije resnično malezijskega porekla in zato ni pomenil izogibanja.
In this case, it was therefore irrelevant whether or not there were imports from China to Malaysia.
V tem primeru je bilo torej vprašanje, ali se je uvažalo s Kitajske v Malezijo ali ne, nepomembno.
The applicant’s claim was therefore rejected.
Zahtevek vložnika je bil zato zavrnjen.
Production volumes in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia
Obseg proizvodnje v Republiki Koreji in Maleziji
The evolution of the total production volume of cooperating producers in the Republic of Korea had remained stable between 2006 and the IP.
Razvoj celotnega obsega proizvodnje sodelujočih podjetij v Republiki Koreji je med letom 2006 in OP ostal nespremenjen.
Malaysian producers however have considerably increased their output during the same period.
Malezijski proizvajalci pa so v istem obdobju svojo proizvodnjo znatno povečali.
Production of SWR of the cooperating companies in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia
Proizvodnja JŽV sodelujočih družb v Republiki Koreji in Maleziji
Source: Verified information provided by the cooperating producers
Vir: Preverjeni podatki, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci.
Production volumes given in tonnes
Obseg proizvodnje v tonah
Malaysia (indexed)
Malezija (indeksirano)
Conclusion on the change in the pattern of trade
Sklepna ugotovitev glede spremembe vzorca trgovanja
The overall decrease of Chinese exports to the Union as from 2006 and the parallel increase of exports from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia and of exports from the PRC to the Republic of Korea after the imposition of the original measures and in particular until 2008 constituted a change in the pattern of trade between the abovementioned countries on the one hand and the Union on the other.
Splošno zmanjšanje kitajskega izvoza v Unijo po letu 2006 ter vzporedno povečanje izvoza iz Republike Koreje in Malezije ter izvoza iz LRK v Republiko Korejo po uvedbi prvotnih ukrepov, zlasti do leta 2008, sta pomenili spremembo vzorca trgovanja med prej navedenimi državami na eni strani in Unijo na drugi.
In the case of the Republic of Korea, this conclusion could be reached both globally and, for the period between 2005 and 2007, also separately for the non-cooperating companies.
Za Republiko Korejo se ta sklepna ugotovitev lahko sprejme na splošno, za obdobje med letoma 2005 in 2007 pa tudi ločeno za nesodelujoče družbe.
Comments were received claiming that the increase of exports of Korean SWR to the Union was stable over the years without any sudden increase; such an increase allegedly being a precondition to establishing a change in the pattern of trade.
Prejete pripombe so vsebovale trditve, da je bilo povečanje izvoza korejskih JŽV v Unijo več let nespremenjeno, brez nenadnih povečanj; tako povečanje je domnevno temeljni pogoj za določitev spremembe vzorca trgovanja.
Furthermore, it was claimed that the increase should be regarded rather as the natural development of the Korean SWR industry.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da je treba povečanje šteti za naravni razvoj korejske industrije JŽV.
Firstly, in accordance with Article 13 of the basic Regulation, a change in the pattern in trade is not exclusively defined as a sudden increase of imports of a country under investigation.
Prvič, v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe sprememba vzorca trgovanja ni opredeljena izključno kot nenadno povečanje uvoza države v preiskavi.
Secondly, the investigation has shown that while Korean exports to the Union in 2006 and 2007 increased substantially, the output by Korean producers in those years was stable.
Drugič, preiskava je pokazala, da se je korejski izvoz v Unijo v letih 2006 in 2007 znatno povečal, medtem ko je bila proizvodnja korejskih proizvajalcev v teh letih nespremenjena.
It thus could not be concluded that the development of the Korean export volumes was solely due to the natural development of the Korean SWR industry.
Zato ni bilo mogoče sklepati, da je mogoče razvoj obsega korejskega izvoza pripisati izključno naravnemu razvoju korejske industrije JŽV.
Finally, for the most part opposite trends between the China to Union trade flows and China to Korea and Korea to Union trade flows since 2006 clearly showed a change in the pattern of trade between the Union and third countries.
In nazadnje, v glavnem so nasprotna gibanja trgovinskih tokov iz Kitajske v Unijo in trgovinskih tokov iz Kitajske v Korejo ter iz Koreje v Unijo po letu 2006 jasno pokazala spremembo vzorca trgovanja med Unijo in tretjimi državami.
These arguments therefore had to be rejected.
Te argumente je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Article 13(1) requires that the change in the pattern of trade stems from a practice, process or work for which there is insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty.
V skladu s členom 13(1) mora spremembo vzorca trgovanja povzročiti praksa, postopek ali dejavnost, za katero razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko upravičena.
The practice, process or work includes, inter alia, the consignment of the product subject to measures via third countries and the assembly of parts by an assembly operation in the Union or a third country.
Praksa, postopek ali dejavnost med drugim vključuje odpremo izdelka, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, prek tretjih držav ter sestavljanje delov z dejavnostjo sestavljanja v Uniji ali tretji državi.
For this purpose the existence of assembly operations was determined in accordance with Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
V ta namen je bil obstoj dejavnosti sestavljanja izdelka določen v skladu s členom 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
The global analysis of the final destinations of steel ropes and cables produced or imported to and from Korea by the cooperating and non-cooperating companies — including imports to and from countries other than the PRC and the Union — showed that a certain amount of exports from Korea to the Union were Chinese-origin imports into Korea, because these imports were not sourced from other third countries or produced by the domestic producers in Korea.
Celovita analiza končnih namembnih krajev jeklenih vrvi in kablov, ki so jih sodelujoče in nesodelujoče družbe proizvedle v Koreji ali uvozile v Korejo ali iz nje – vključno z uvozom v države, ki niso LRK in Unija, in iz njih –, je pokazala, da je določena količina izvoza iz Koreje v Unijo dejansko uvoz izdelkov kitajskega porekla v Korejo, ker ti izdelki ne izvirajo iz drugih tretjih držav oziroma jih niso proizvedli domači proizvajalci v Koreji.
Moreover, the comparison of the total Korean export of SWR — as recorded in Korean statistics — and the verified information of the cooperating exporting producers concerning their production showed that production destined for export by Korean producers (118856 tonnes) was significantly lower than the total exports from Korea (156440 tonnes) in the IP.
Poleg tega je primerjava celotnega korejskega izvoza JŽV – kot je evidentirana v korejskih statističnih podatkih – in preverjenih informacij sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov o njihovi proizvodnji pokazala, da je bila v OP proizvodnja, namenjena izvozu korejskih proizvajalcev (118856 ton), bistveno manjša od celotnega izvoza iz Koreje (156440 ton).
Given the high cooperation of Korean companies in this investigation, this difference cannot be explained by producers that may not have been cooperating in the investigation.
Glede na visoko raven sodelovanja korejskih podjetij v tej preiskavi se ta razlika ne more pojasniti s proizvajalci, ki morda niso sodelovali v preiskavi.
The investigation also revealed that some importers in the Union sourced Chinese origin SWR from Korean exporters not cooperating during the present investigation.
Preiskava je tudi razkrila, da so nekaterim uvoznikom v Uniji JŽV s kitajskim poreklom dobavljali korejski izvozniki, ki v tej preiskavi niso sodelovali.
This information was counter-checked with Korean trade databases which showed that at least some of the SWR exported by these non-cooperating companies was indeed sourced in China.
Ta informacija se je navzkrižno preverila s korejskimi trgovinskimi podatkovnimi zbirkami, kar je pokazalo, da je bil vsaj del JŽV, ki so jih izvozile nesodelujoče družbe, dejansko dobavljen iz Kitajske.
As for the cooperating companies it could be established that none of them transhipped the product concerned via the Republic of Korea in the IP.
Za sodelujoče družbe se je lahko ugotovilo, da v OP nobena od njih ni pretovarjala zadevnega izdelka prek Republike Koreje.
Some of them imported SWR from the PRC, but these were found to be exclusively sold on the domestic and other export markets.
Nekatere od njih so uvažale JŽV iz LRK, vendar se je zanje ugotovilo, da so te izdelke prodajale izključno na domačem in drugih izvoznih trgih.
In the case of one company it was found that it submitted false information in its questionnaire reply.
Za eno družbo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v izpolnjenem vprašalniku navedla napačne informacije.
Furthermore, during the verification visit access to information was partially denied.
Poleg tega je bil med preveritvenim obiskom dostop do informacij deloma zavrnjen.
Therefore in accordance with Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, findings with regard to this company were based on facts available.
Zato so bile v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe ugotovitve glede navedene družbe utemeljene z razpoložljivimi dejstvi.
In accordance with Article 18(4), the company was informed of the intention to disregard the information submitted by it and was granted a time limit to provide further explanations.
V skladu s členom 18(4) je bila družba obveščena, da se informacije, ki jih je predložila, ne bodo upoštevale, odobren pa ji je bil tudi rok za predložitev dodatnih pojasnil.
Subsequent to disclosure, the company admitted that it had circumvented the measures in the past by falsifying the origin of products purchased from the PRC.
Po razkritju je družba priznala, da je se je v preteklosti izogibala ukrepom tako, da je ponaredila poreklo izdelkov, nabavljenih iz LRK.
On the other hand the company claimed that it submitted sufficient information regarding the production, sales and purchases during the IP which was verified on-spot.
Po drugi strani je družba trdila, da je predložila dovolj informacij o proizvodnji, prodaji in nabavi v OP, ki so bile preverjene na kraju samem.
It further argued that this should be sufficient to determine that it had not circumvented the measures in force in the IP.
Trdila je tudi, da bi moralo to zadostovati za določitev, da se ni izogibala veljavnim ukrepom v OP.
However, in view of the fact that circumvention by the company admitted to have engaged in circumvention practices and furthermore tried to mislead the investigation, it is considered appropriate to disregard the entirety of the company’s submission and not to exempt this company from the extended measures, as further outlined below in recital 77.
Vendar ker je družba priznala, da se je poskušala izogniti ukrepom, in ker je poleg tega poskušala zavajati preiskavo, je primerno, da se predložene informacije družbe v celoti ne upoštevajo in da se družba izvzame iz razširjenih ukrepov, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 77.
As explained in recital 18, one company notified the Commission that it went bankrupt and withdrew its cooperation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 18, je ena družba Komisijo obvestila, da je šla v stečaj, in je preklicala sodelovanje.
As above, findings with regard to this company had to be based on the facts available within the meaning of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation.
Kot zgoraj je bilo treba ugotovitve v zvezi s to družbo utemeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih, v smislu člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe.
On the basis of these facts it was concluded that although none of the cooperating Korean producers were found to be involved, transhipment was taking place during the IP and the preceding years.
Na podlagi teh dejstev je bilo sklenjeno, da je v OP in letih pred tem pretovarjanje potekalo, čeprav za nobenega sodelujočega korejskega proizvajalca ni bilo ugotovljeno, da bi sodeloval pri tem.
This is also confirmed by the findings with regard to the change of the pattern in trade as described above in recital 39.
To potrjujejo tudi ugotovitve glede spremembe vzorca trgovanja, kakor je opisana v predhodni uvodni izjavi 39.
It has to be noted that in 2007 OLAF started an investigation into transhipment of the same product through Korea.
Treba je opozoriti, da je OLAF leta 2007 začel preiskavo v zvezi s pretovarjanjem enakega izdelka prek Koreje.