natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, the Arrangement initialled on 19 January 2009 should be signed and the attached Joint Declarations approved.
Ob upoštevanju njegove morebitne poznejše sklenitve je treba Dogovor, parafiran 19. januarja 2009, podpisati ter odobriti priloženi skupni izjavi.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it, or subject to its application.
Danska v skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki je zato ne zavezuje in se zanjo ne uporablja.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis under the provisions of Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 5 of that Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the date of adoption of this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
Ker ta sklep nadgrajuje schengenski pravni red po določbah naslova IV tretjega dela Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska v skladu s členom 5 navedenega protokola v šestih mesecih po datumu sprejetja tega sklepa odloči, ali ga bo prenesla v svojo nacionalno zakonodajo ali ne.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [2].
Ta sklep pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [2].
The United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Združeno kraljestvo zato ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki ga zato ne zavezuje in se zanj ne uporablja.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [3].
Ta sklep pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [3].
Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to application thereof,
Irska zato ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki je zato ne zavezuje in se zanjo ne uporablja –
The signing of the Arrangement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the other part, on the modalities of the participation by those States in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union and the attached Joint Declarations are hereby approved on behalf of the Community, subject to the conclusion of the Arrangement.
Podpis Dogovora med Evropsko skupnostjo na eni strani ter Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn na drugi strani o podrobnostih sodelovanja teh držav v Evropski agenciji za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije ter priloženi skupni izjavi, se v imenu Skupnosti odobrijo ob upoštevanju sklenitve Dogovora.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Arrangement on behalf of the Community, subject to its conclusion.
Predsednik Sveta je s tem pooblaščen za imenovanje oseb, pooblaščenih, da dogovor ob upoštevanju njegove sklenitve podpišejo v imenu Skupnosti.
of 13 September 2010
z dne 13. septembra 2010
on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to Vehicle Registration Data (VRD) in Finland
o začetku avtomatizirane izmenjave podatkov iz registrov vozil na Finskem
Having regard to Article 25 of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime [1],
ob upoštevanju člena 25 Sklepa Sveta 2008/615/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o poglobitvi čezmejnega sodelovanja, zlasti na področju boja proti terorizmu in čezmejnemu kriminalu [1],
Having regard to Article 20 and Chapter 4 of the Annex to Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA [2],
ob upoštevanju člena 20 in poglavja 4 Priloge k Sklepu Sveta 2008/616/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o izvajanju Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ [2],
According to the Protocol on Transitional Provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, the legal effects of the acts of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union adopted prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon are preserved until those acts are repealed, annulled or amended in implementation of the Treaties.
V skladu s Protokolom o prehodni ureditvi, priloženim k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji, Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo akti institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije, sprejeti pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, ohranijo pravni učinek, dokler niso razveljavljeni, razglašeni za nične ali spremenjeni zaradi izvajanja Pogodb.
Accordingly, Article 25 of Decision 2008/615/JHA is applicable and the Council must unanimously decide whether the Member States have implemented the provisions of Chapter 6 of that Decision.
Skladno s tem se uporablja člen 25 Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ, Svet pa mora s soglasno odločitvijo ugotoviti, ali so države članice uveljavile določbe poglavja 6 navedenega sklepa.
Article 20 of Decision 2008/616/JHA provides that decisions referred to in Article 25(2) of Decision 2008/615/JHA are to be taken on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire.
Člen 20 Sklepa 2008/616/PNZ določa, da je treba sklepe iz člena 25(2) Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ sprejemati na podlagi poročila o oceni, ki je oprto na vprašalnik.
With respect to automated data exchange in accordance with Chapter 2 of Decision 2008/615/JHA, the evaluation report is to be based on an evaluation visit and a pilot run.
Kar zadeva avtomatizirano izmenjavo podatkov v skladu s poglavjem 2 Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ, se poročilo o oceni pripravi na podlagi ocenjevalnega obiska in preskusa.
According to Chapter 4, point 1.1, of the Annex to Decision 2008/616/JHA, the questionnaire drawn up by the relevant Council Working Group concerns each of the automated data exchanges and has to be answered by a Member State as soon as it believes it fulfils the prerequisites for sharing data in the relevant data category.
V skladu s točko 1.1 poglavja 4 Priloge k Sklepu 2008/616/PNZ vprašalnik, ki ga je pripravila pristojna delovna skupina Sveta, zadeva vsako avtomatizirano izmenjavo podatkov in ga mora država članica izpolniti takoj, ko meni, da v ustrezni kategoriji podatkov izpolnjuje predpogoje za delitev podatkov.
Finland has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on Vehicle Registration Data (VRD).
Finska je izpolnila vprašalnik o varstvu podatkov in vprašalnik o podatkih iz registrov vozil.
A pilot run has been carried out by Finland with the Netherlands, with a view to evaluating the results of the questionnaire concerning VRD.
Finska je z namenom ocene rezultatov iz vprašalnika o podatkih iz registrov vozil opravila preskus z Nizozemsko.
An evaluation visit has taken place in Finland and a report on the evaluation visit has been produced by the evaluation team and forwarded to the relevant Council Working Group with a view to evaluating the questionnaire concerning VRD.
Na Finskem je bil opravljen ocenjevalni obisk, o katerem je ocenjevalna skupina pripravila poročilo in ga posredovala pristojni delovni skupini Sveta z namenom ocenitve vprašalnika o podatkih iz registrov vozil.
An overall evaluation report, summarising the results of the questionnaire, the evaluation visit and the pilot run concerning VRD has been presented to the Council,
Splošno poročilo o oceni, v katerem so povzeti rezultati iz vprašalnika ter ocenjevalnega obiska in preskusa v zvezi s podatki iz registrov vozil, je bilo predloženo Svetu –
For the purposes of the automated searching of vehicle registration data (VRD), Finland has fully implemented the general provisions on data protection of Chapter 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA and is entitled to receive and supply personal data pursuant to Article 12 of that Decision as from the date of the entry into force of this Decision.
Finska je za namene avtomatiziranega iskanja podatkov iz registrov vozil v celoti uveljavila splošne določbe o varstvu podatkov iz poglavja 6 Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ ter je upravičena prejemati in pošiljati osebne podatke na podlagi člena 12 navedenega sklepa, in sicer od datuma začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa.
Done at Brussels, 13 September 2010.
V Bruslju, 13. septembra 2010
(notified under document C(2010) 6259)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 6259)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 of 20 December 2007 applying the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements [1], and in particular Article 36(4) of Annex II thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1528/2007 z dne 20. decembra 2007 o uporabi ureditev za blago s poreklom iz nekaterih držav iz skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP), določenih v sporazumih, ki vzpostavljajo ali vodijo k vzpostavitvi sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu [1], in zlasti člena 36(4) Priloge II k Uredbi,
On 17 July 2008 Commission Decision 2008/603/EC [2] was adopted granting a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Mauritius with regard to preserved tuna and tuna loins.
Dne 17. julija 2008 je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/603/ES [2], s katero je bilo odobreno začasno odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zaradi upoštevanja posebnih razmer na Mauritiusu v zvezi s konzerviranim tunom in fileti tuna.
On 15 June 2009 Commission Decision 2009/471/EC [3] was adopted granting an extension of that temporary derogation.
Dne 15. junija 2009 je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2009/471/ES [3] o podaljšanju navedenega začasnega odstopanja.
On 21 December 2009 Mauritius requested in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex.
Mauritius je 21. decembra 2009 v skladu s členom 36 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zahteval novo odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz navedene priloge.
According to the information received from Mauritius the catches of raw tuna remain unusually low even compared to the normal seasonal variations.
Po informacijah, ki jih je predložil Mauritius, je količina ulova surovega tuna še vedno nenavadno majhna celo ob upoštevanju običajnih sezonskih nihanj.
Given that the abnormal situation in 2009 remains unchanged for 2010 a new derogation should be granted with effect from 1 January 2010.
Ker se neobičajne razmere iz leta 2009 v letu 2010 niso spremenile, je treba odobriti novo odstopanje z učinkom od 1. januarja 2010.
On 14 August 2008 Commission Decision 2008/691/EC [4] was adopted granting a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Seychelles with regard to preserved tuna.
Dne 14. avgusta 2008 je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/691/ES [4], s katero je bilo odobreno začasno odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zaradi upoštevanja posebnih razmer na Sejšelih v zvezi s konzerviranim tunom.
By Decision 2009/471/EC an extension of that temporary derogation was granted.
Z Odločbo 2009/471/ES je bilo odobreno podaljšanje navedenega začasnega odstopanja.
On 25 January 2010 Seychelles requested in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex.
Sejšeli so 25. januarja 2010 v skladu s členom 36 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zahtevali novo odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz navedene priloge.
According to the information provided by Seychelles the catches of raw tuna remain very low even compared to the normal seasonal variations.
Po informacijah, ki so jih predložili Sejšeli, je količina ulova surovega tuna zelo majhna celo ob upoštevanju običajnih sezonskih nihanj.
On 18 September 2008 Commission Decision 2008/751/EC [5] was adopted granting a temporary derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Annex II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 to take account of the special situation of Madagascar with regard to preserved tuna and tuna loins.
Dne 18. septembra 2008 je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/751/ES [5], s katero je bilo odobreno začasno odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zaradi upoštevanja posebnih razmer na Madagaskarju v zvezi s konzerviranim tunom in fileti tuna.
On 22 May 2010 Madagascar requested in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in that Annex.
Madagaskar je 22. maja 2010 v skladu s členom 36 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 zahteval novo odstopanje od pravil o poreklu iz navedene priloge.
On 8 June 2010 Madagascar provided additional information.
Madagaskar je dodatne informacije predložil 8. junija 2010.
According to the information provided by Madagascar sourcing of raw originating tuna remains difficult due to their unavailability.
Po informacijah, ki jih je predložil Madagaskar, je ulov surovega tuna s poreklom težaven zaradi pomanjkanja te vrste rib.
Decisions 2008/603/EC, 2008/691/EC and 2008/751/EC applied until 31 December 2009 because the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States on the one part and the European Community and its Member States on the other part (ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement) did not enter into force or was not provisionally applied before that date.
Odločbe 2008/603/ES, 2008/691/ES in 2008/751/ES so se uporabljale do 31. decembra 2009, ker začasni sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu z vzhodnimi in južnimi afriškimi državami na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani (začasni sporazum o partnerstvu VJA-EU) ni začel veljati ali se ni začasno uporabljal pred tem datumom.
In accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 the rules of origin set out in Annex II to that Regulation and the derogations to them are to be superseded by the rules of the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement of which the entry into force or the provisional application is foreseen to take place in 2010.
V skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1528/2007 je treba pravila o poreklu iz Priloge II k navedeni uredbi in odstopanja od njih nadomestiti s pravili začasnega sporazuma o partnerstvu VJA-EU, katerega začetek veljavnosti ali začasna uporaba sta predvidena za leto 2010.
It is necessary to ensure continuity of importations from the ACP countries to the Union as well as a smooth transition to the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement.
Treba je zagotoviti nadaljevanje uvoza iz držav AKP v Unijo ter nemoten prehod k začasnemu sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu.
Decisions 2008/603/EC, 2008/691/EC and 2008/751/EC should therefore be prolonged with effect from 1 January 2010.
Odločbe 2008/603/ES, 2008/691/ES in 2008/751/ES je zato treba podaljšati z učinkom od 1. januarja 2010.
It would be inappropriate to grant by this Decision derogations in accordance with Article 36 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 which exceed the annual quota granted to the ESA region under the ESA-EU Interim Partnership Agreement.
Neprimerno bi bilo, da se s tem sklepom v skladu s členom 36 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1528/2007 odobrijo odstopanja, ki presegajo letno kvoto, odobreno za regijo VJA v skladu z začasnim sporazumom o partnerstvu VJA-EU.
The ESA signatories to the Agreement have therefore signed a unilateral political declaration concerning the derogations for tuna granted in 2010 whereby these countries renounce to the global annual quantity of the automatic derogation for 2010 in case that the Agreement will either be provisionally applied or enter into force during this year.
Podpisnice sporazuma iz regije VJA so zato podpisale enostransko politično deklaracijo o odstopanjih za tuna, ki so bila odobrena leta 2010, s katero se te države odrekajo skupni letni količini samodejnega odstopanja za leto 2010, če se bo sporazum bodisi začasno uporabljal ali začel veljati v tem letu.
Consequently the quota amounts for 2010 should be set at the same level as for 2009.
Kvote za leto 2010 je torej treba določiti na isti ravni kot za leto 2009.
Decisions 2008/603/EC, 2008/691/EC and 2008/751/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktive 2008/603/EGS, 2008/691/EGS in 2008/751/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za carinski zakonik –
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to the products and the quantities set out in the Annex which are declared for free circulation into the Community from Mauritius during the periods of 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2008, 1 January 2009 until 31 December 2009, and 1 January 2010 until 31 December 2010.’
Odstopanje iz člena 1 se uporablja za proizvode in količine z Mauritiusa, navedene v Prilogi in prijavljene za sprostitev v prosti promet Skupnosti v obdobjih od 1. januarja 2008 do 31. decembra 2008, od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 ter od 1. januarja 2010 do 31. decembra 2010.“;
In Article 6, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
drugi odstavek člena 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘It shall apply until 31 December 2010.’
„Uporablja se do 31. decembra 2010.“;
The Annex is replaced by the text set out in Annex I to this Decision.
Priloga se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge I k temu sklepu.
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to the products and the quantities set out in the Annex which are declared for free circulation into the Community from Seychelles during the periods of 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2008, 1 January 2009 until 31 December 2009 and 1 January 2010 until 31 December 2010.’
Odstopanje iz člena 1 se uporablja za proizvode in količine s Sejšelov, navedene v Prilogi in prijavljene za sprostitev v prosti promet Skupnosti v obdobjih od 1. januarja 2008 do 31. decembra 2008, od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 ter od 1. januarja 2010 do 31. decembra 2010.“;
The Annex is replaced by the text set out in Annex II to this Decision.
Priloga se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge II k temu sklepu.
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to the products and the quantities set out in the Annex which are declared for free circulation into the Community from Madagascar during the periods of 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2008, 1 January 2009 until 31 December 2009 and 1 January 2010 until 31 December 2010.’
Odstopanje iz člena 1 se uporablja za proizvode in količine z Madagaskarja, navedene v Prilogi in prijavljene za sprostitev v prosti promet Skupnosti v obdobjih od 1. januarja 2008 do 31. decembra 2008, od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 ter od 1. januarja 2010 do 31. decembra 2010.“;
The Annex is replaced by the text set out in Annex III to this Decision.
Priloga se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge III k temu sklepu.
OJ L 155, 18.6.2009, p. 46.
UL L 155, 18.6.2009, str. 46.
concerning national provisions notified by Denmark on the addition of nitrite to certain meat products
o nacionalnih določbah o dodajanju nitritov nekaterim mesnim izdelkom, o katerih je Danska poslala uradno obvestilo
(notified under document C(2010) 3301)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 3301)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 114(6) Pogodbe,
By letter of 21 November 2007 and pursuant to Article 95(4) of the EC Treaty (now Article 114(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — TFEU), the Kingdom of Denmark (Denmark) notified to the Commission its national provisions on the addition of nitrites to certain meat products, contained in Order No 22 of 11 January 2005 on food additives (Bekendtgørelse nr 22 af 11.1.2005 om tilsætningsstoffer til fødevarer) and the Danish positive list of permitted food additives (Liste over tilladte tilsætningsstoffer til fødevarer, ‘Positivlisten’) [1].
Kraljevina Danska (Danska) je s pismom z dne 21. novembra 2007 v skladu s členom 95(4) Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 114(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije – PDEU) Komisijo obvestila o nacionalnih določbah o dodajanju nitritov nekaterim mesnim izdelkom, navedenih v Odloku št. 22 z dne 11. januarja 2005 o aditivih za živila (Bekendtgørelse nr 22 af 11.1.2005 om tilsætningsstoffer til fødevarer) in na danskem pozitivnem seznamu dovoljenih aditivov za živila (Liste over tilladte tilsætningsstoffer til fødevarer, „Positivlisten“) [1].
Denmark considered necessary to maintain these provisions and therefore not to transpose Directive 2006/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 amending Directive 95/2/EC on food additives other than colours and sweeteners and Directive 94/35/EC on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs [2] into national law in so far as it relates to the use of nitrites in meat products.
Danska je menila, da je treba te določbe ohraniti in da zato ne namerava prenesti Direktive 2006/52/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o spremembi Direktive 95/2/ES o aditivih za živila razen barvil in sladil in Direktive 94/35/ES o sladilih za uporabo v živilih [2] v nacionalno zakonodajo, če zadeva uporabo nitritov v mesnih izdelkih.
By Commission Decision 2008/448/EC [3], these national provisions were approved until 23 May 2010, pending the demonstration by the Danish authorities — by means of a renewed notification — that the application of the levels laid down in Directive 2006/52/EC do not achieve the required level of protection and would lead to an unacceptable risk to human health.
Komisija je z Odločbo 2008/448/ES [3] te nacionalne določbe odobrila do 23. maja 2010, dokler danski organi ne dokažejo, in sicer z novim uradnim obvestilom, da uporaba ravni iz Direktive 2006/52/ES ne dosega zahtevane ravni varovanja in da lahko privede do nesprejemljivega tveganja za zdravje ljudi.