natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the casino Mont Parnès ETA was followed by the EKP (Elliniko Kasino Parnithas A.E.), set up in 2001 as a subsidiary of the Hellenic Tourism Development Company S.A. (ETA), a company fully controlled by the Greek state.
V primeru igralnice Mont Parnès je družbo ETA nasledila družba Elliniko Kazino Parnithas AE, podružnica družbe ETA, ustanovljena leta 2001.
The Mont Parnès casino was partially privatised on 10.5.2003 with the sale, by international call to tender, of 49 % of the shares in the company Hellenic Mont Parnès Casino S.A. (EKP) to Athens Resort Casino Holding Company S.A. (ARC), which was set up by the successful candidate grouping (Hyatt Regency – Elliniki Technodomiki) in the call to tender procedure.
Igralnica Mont Parnès je bila 10. maja 2003 po mednarodnem javnem razpisu za oddajo ponudb delno privatizirana s prodajo 49 % delnic v družbi Elliniko Kazino Parnithas AE družbi Athens Resort Casino Anonymi Etaireia Symmetochon AE, ki jo je ustanovil izbrani ponudnik, tj. konzorcij Hyatt Regency – Elliniki Technodomiki.
The company EKP had been set up in 2001 as a subsidiary of ETA, a company fully controlled by the Greek state.
Družba Elliniko Kazino Parnithas je bila ustanovljena leta 2001 kot podružnica družbe ETA.
ETA was founded in 1998 and had assumed in 2000 the management of the Mont Parnès and Corfu casinos, as successor to EOT (see also footnote 12 above).
ETA je bila ustanovljena leta 1998, leta 2000 pa je nasledila EOT kot upravljavca igralnice Mont Parnès in igralnice na Krfu (glej tudi sprotno opombo 12).
According to information received from the Greek authorities during the formal investigation procedure, the Corfu casino was privatised on 30.8.2010, with the sale, by international call to tender, of 100 % of the shares in the company Corfu Hellenic Casino S.A. (EKK) to V&T Corfu Casino S.A., which was set up by the successful candidate grouping (Vivere Entertainment Commercial & Holding S.A. – Theros International Gaming INC.) in the call to tender procedure. The Company EKK had been set up in 2001 as a subsidiary of ETA.
Po informacijah, prejetih od grških organov med formalnim postopkom preiskave, je bila igralnica na Krfu po mednarodnem javnem razpisu za oddajo ponudb privatizirana 30. avgusta 2010 s prodajo celotnega osnovnega kapitala družbe Elliniki Kazino Kerkyras AE družbi V&T Corfu Ependyseis Casino AE, ki jo je ustanovil izbrani ponudnik, tj. konzorcij Vivere Entertainment Emporiki & Symmetochon AE – Theros International Gaming Inc. Družba Elliniki Kazino Kerkyras AE je bila ustanovljena leta 2001 kot podružnica družbe ETA.
See footnote 13.
Glej sprotno opombo 13.
Ar. Ph. 904 of 6.12.1994.
Sklic na objavo FEK 904, 6.12.1994.
Law 2687/1953 concerning investments and protection of foreign funding.
Zakonodajni odlok 2687/1953 v zvezi z naložbami in zaščito tujih sredstev.
The Thessaloniki casino was declared to benefit from the provisions of the Law 2687/1953 according to the Presidential Decree Π.Λ. 290/1995 which assimilated it to the casinos of Mont Parnès and Corfu.
Za igralnico v Solunu so določbe iz zakonodajnega odloka 2687/1953 začele veljati s predsedniškim odlokom (PD) 290/1995, ki je navajal, da se ji zagotovi enaka obravnava kot igralnici Mont Parnès in igralnici na Krfu.
See also paragraphs 16-18 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodne izjave 16–18 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
See also paragraphs 19-23 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodne izjave 19–23 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
See also paragraphs 26-28 and 37 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodne izjave 26–28 in 37 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
See also paragraphs 24-29 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodne izjave 24–29 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
See also paragraphs 30-32 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodne izjave 30–32 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
See also paragraphs 34-35 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodni izjavi 34–35 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
See also paragraphs 36-38 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodne izjave 36–38 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
See also paragraphs 39-40 in the Opening Decision.
Uvodni izjavi 39–40 v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
In the opinion of the Greek Council of State, this results from the fact that: (a) the legislature, staying in line with the objectives of the law, requires the selling of tickets only to those entering the gaming area and not to the users of other services (hotel, restaurant, etc.) provided on the casino premises, (b) the price of admission tickets is not included in the State’s revenues listed pursuant to Article 2(6) of Law 2206/1994, and (c) the legislature provides the option to either establish a uniform set of regulations for all casinos subject to Law 2206/1994, or establish individual regulations if it is deemed that there are special grounds dictating the need for different individual regulations.
Po navedbah državnega sveta je vzrok za to v tem, da: (a) zakonodajna oblast pri sledenju ciljem zakona zahteva prodajo vstopnic samo tistim, ki vstopijo v igralni prostor, ne pa uporabnikom drugih storitev, ki se zagotavljajo v prostorih (hotelu, restavraciji itd.); (b) cena vstopnic ni vključena v dohodek države, naveden v členu 2(6) zakona 2206/1994; in (c) zakonodajna oblast zagotavlja možnost bodisi vzpostavitve enotne ureditve za vse igralnice v skladu z zakonom 2206/1994 ali določitve posameznih ureditev, če se presodi, da za to obstajajo posebni razlogi.
Judgement No 4027/1998 of the Greek Council of State.
Sodba državnega sveta št. 4027/1998.
See also footnote 39 above.
Glej tudi sprotno opombo 39.
Rhodes is not mentioned here, because it applies the EUR 15 price since 1999 (and thus is not affected by potential recovery – in consideration of the 10 years limitation period as provided pursuant to Article 15 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999).
Igralnica na Rodosu tukaj ni navedena, ker je od leta 1999 zaračunavala 15 EUR in zato zanjo ob upoštevanju desetletnega zastaralnega roka, določenega v členu 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, ne bi veljala nobena terjatev.
In particular, Law 2687/1953; Law 2206/1994; Ministerial Decision Y.A 1128269/1226/0015/ΠΟΛ.1292/16.11.1995 – ΦΕΚ 982/B’/1995; Law 3139/30.4.2003.
Zlasti zakonodajni odlok 2687/1953; zakon 2206/1994; ministrski odlok 1128269/1226/0015/POL.1292 z dne 16. novembra 1995 (FEK 982/B'/1995) in zakon 3139 z dne 30. aprila 2003.
According to paragraph 10.1 of the Ministerial Decision of 1995, cited above: ‘The public fees shall be deposited at the competent income tax office by the tenth day of each month by submitting a statement concerning the fees collected during the previous month’.
Odstavek 10.1 ministrskega odloka iz leta 1995, navedenega zgoraj: „Javne dajatve se plačajo pri davčnem uradu, pristojnem za obdavčitev dohodka podjetja, do desetega dne v mesecu, z navedbo dajatev, zbranih v preteklem mesecu.“
Notwithstanding the reference to public casinos above, the Commission notes that the same lower price of admission tickets applicable to public casinos is exceptionally applicable to one privately owned casino – Thessaloniki – as described in this Decision.
Ne glede na zgoraj navedeno sklicevanje na javne igralnice Komisija poudarja, da se z uporabo izjeme nižja vstopnina za javne igralnice uporablja tudi za igralnico v zasebni lasti, tj. igralnico v Solunu, kot je pojasnjeno drugje v tem sklepu.
See judgement of the Court of Justice of 8 November 2001, case C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline et Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke, 2001 ECR I-8365.
Sodba sodišča z dne 8. novembra 2001 v zadevi C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline in Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke, Recueil, str. I-8365.
Rhodes casino began applying the EUR 15 price after its privatisation in 1999, and has paid 80 % thereof since that date.
Igralnica na Rodosu je po privatizaciji leta 1999 začela zaračunavati ceno v višini 15 EUR in od takrat plačuje 80 % te cene.
See for instance case C76/2003 – Commission Decision 2011/276/EU of 26 May 2010 concerning State aid in the form of a tax settlement agreement implemented by Belgium in favour of Umicore SA (formerly Union Minière SA), OJ L 122, 11.5.2011, p. 76.
Glej na primer zadevo C 76/03 – Sklep Komisije 2001/276/EU z dne 26. maja 2010 o državni pomoči v obliki sporazuma o davčni poravnavi, ki jo je Belgija odobrila družbi Umicore S.A. (prej „Union Miniere S.A.“) ( UL L 122, 11.5.2011).
Commission Decision 98/476/EC of 21 January 1998 on tax concessions under § 52(8) of the German Income Tax Act, OJ L 212, 30.7.1998, p. 50.
Odločba Komisije 98/476/ES z dne 21. januarja 1998 o davčnih ugodnostih, v okviru člena 52(8) nemškega zakona o dohodnini (UL L 212, 30.7.1998, str. 50).
Accordingly, the Thessaloniki Casino offers from Sunday to Thursday free price of admission between 7 am – 20 pm (from 10/01) – http://www.regencycasinos.gr/en-GB/Promotion/Kliroseis/Kliroseis.aspx
Igralnica v Solunu nudi prost vstop med 7. in 20. uro od nedelje do četrtka (od 10. januarja): http://www.regencycasinos.gr/en-GB/Promotion/Kliroseis/Klirosei+.aspx.
However, during the formal investigation procedure, Loutraki sustained that in practice it has paid the same amount as its competitors under a separate agreement with the authorities.
Vendar pa je igralnica v Lutrakiju med formalnim postopkom preiskave trdila, da je na podlagi ločenega sporazuma z organi v praksi plačala enak znesek kot njeni konkurenti.
See judgement of the Court of Justice of 10.1.2006, case C-222/04, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze and others [2006] ERC, I-289.
Sodba z dne 10. januarja 2006 v zadevi C-222/04, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze in drugi, ZOdl, str. I-289.
See Commission Decision of 22 September 2004, N 354/04, Irish Holding Company Regime, OJ C 131, 28.5.2005, p. 10.
Glej tudi odločbo Komisije z dne 22. septembra 2004 v zadevi N 354/04, Režim irske holdinške družbe (UL C 131, 28.5.2005, str. 10).
In this sense also Commission Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation, OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3.
V zvezi s tem glej tudi Obvestilo Komisije o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe, ki zadevajo neposredno obdavčitev ustvarjenega dohodka (UL C 384, 10.12.1998, str. 3).
Commission Decision 2003/515/EC of 17 February 2003 on the State aid implemented by the Netherlands for international financing activities (State aid case C 52/01), OJ L 180, 18.7.2003, p. 52, paragraph 84.
Odločba Komisije 2003/515/ES z dne 17. februarja 2003 o državni pomoči, ki jo izvaja Nizozemska za mednarodne finančne dejavnosti (ukrep pomoči št. C 52/01) (UL L 180, 18.7.2003, str. 52, odstavek 84).
See, to that effect, judgement of the Court of Justice of 29.4.2004, case C-308/01, GIL Insurance [2004] ECR I-4777, paragraph 68, and judgement of the Court of Justice of 3.3.2005, case C-172/03, Heiser [2005] ECR I-1627, paragraph 40, judgement of the Court of Justice of 6.9.2006, case C-88/03, Portugal v. Commission [2006] ECR I-7115, paragraph 54.
V zvezi s tem glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 2004 v zadevi C-308/01, GIL Insurance, Recueil, str. I-4777, točka 68; sodbo z dne 3. marca 2005 v zadevi C-172/03, Heiser, ZOdl, str. I-1627, točka 40; in sodbo z dne 6. septembra 2006 v zadevi C-88/03, Portugalska proti Komisiji, ZOdl, str. I-7115, točka 54.
See, to that effect, judgement of the Court of Justice of 6.9.2006, case C-88/03, Portugal v. Commission [2006] ECR I-7115, paragraph 54.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 6. septembra 2006 v zadevi C-88/03, Portugalska proti Komisiji, ZOdl, str. I-7115, točka 54.
See, to that effect, judgement of the Court of Justice Case T-93/2002 of 18 January 2005 Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel/Commission 2005 ECR II-143.See for instance judgement of the Court of Justice of 29.2.1996, case C-56/93, Belgium v Commission [1996] ECR I-723, paragraph 79; judgement of the Court of Justice of 26.9.1996, case C-241/94, France v Commission, [1996] ECR I-4551, paragraph 20; judgement of the Court of Justice of 17.6.1999, case C-75/97, Belgium v Commission, [1999] ECR I-3671, paragraph 25; and judgement of the Court of Justice of 13.2.2003, case C-409/00, Spain v Commission, [2003] ECR I-10901, paragraph 46.
V zvezi s tem glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje (zdaj Splošnega sodišča) z dne 18. januarja 2005 v zadevi T-93/2002, Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel proti Komisiji, ZOdl, str. II-143.Glej tudi na primer sodbo Sodišča z dne 29. februarja 1996 v zadevi C-56/93, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-723, točka 79; sodbo z dne 26. septembra 1996 v zadevi C-241/94, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-4551, točka 20; sodbo z dne 17. junija 1999 v zadevi C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-3671, točka 25, in sodbo z dne 13. februarja 2003 v zadevi C-409/00, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-10901, točka 46.
Case 173/73 Italy v. Commission [1974] ECR 709.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi 173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1974, str. 709.
See case C-88/03, Portugal v. Commission, paragraph 81 see footnote 49 here above, See judgement of the Court of First Instance of 9.9.2009, case T-227/01, Territorio foral de Alava and others, not yet published, paragraph 179 and judgement of the Court of First instance of 9.9.2009, case T-230/01, Territorio foral de Alava and others, not yet published, paragraph 190.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi C-88/03, Portugalska proti Komisiji, sprotna opomba 49, točka 81. Glej tudi sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 9. septembra 2009 v zadevi T-227/01, Territorio Histórico de Álava in drugi, še neobjavljena, točka 179, in sodbo z dne 9. septembra 2009 v zadevi T-230/01, Territorio Histórico de Álava in drugi, še neobjavljena, točka 190.
See, to that effect, judgement of the Court of Justice C-372/97, Italy v. Commission [2004] ECR I-3679, paragraph 44, judgement of the Court of Justice C-66/02, Italy v. Commission [2005] ECR I-10901, paragraph 111, judgement of the Court of Justice C-222/04, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 140.
Glej sodbo Sodišča v zadevi C-372/97, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2004, str. I-3679, točka 44; zadevi C-66/02, Italija proti Komisiji, ZOdl 2005, str. I-10901, točka 111; in zadevi C-222/04, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, ZOdl 2006, str. I-289, točka 140.
Judgement of the General Court, case T-214/95, Vlaams Gewest v. Commission, [1998] ECR II-717.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje v zadevi T-214/95, Het Vlaamse Gewest proti Komisiji, Recueil 1998, str. II-717.
Judgement of the General Court in the case Het Vlaams Gewest/Commission, of 30 April 1998 cited above; Judgment of the Court in case Altmark trans et Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, of 24 July 2003, aff. C-280/00, Rec. 2003, p. I-7747, paragraphs 81-82 and judgment of the Court in case Heiser, of 3 March 2005, aff. C-172/03, Rec. 2005, p. I-1627, paragraphs 32-33.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 30. aprila 1998 v zadevi, Het Vlaamse Gewest proti Komisiji, navedeni zgoraj; sodba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, Recueil, str. I-7747, točki 81–82, in sodba z dne 3. marca 2005 v zadevi C-172/03, Heiser, ZOdl, str. I-1627, točki 32–33.
In particular judgements of the General Court in case C-172/03; Wolfgang Heiser/Finanzamt Innsbruck, of 3 March 2005 and case C-280/00, Altmark Trans et Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, of 24 July 2003.
Glej zlasti sodbo Sodišča z dne 3. marca 2005 v zadevi C-172/03, Heiser, in sodbo z dne 24. julija 2003 zadevi C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg.
In particular judgment of the Court of 8 September 2009 in case C-42/07 Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International Ltd, formerly Baw International Ltd v Departamento de Jogos da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa 2009 ECR I-7633.
Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 8. septembra 2009 v zadevi C-42/07, Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional in Bwin International proti Departamento de Jogos da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa, ZOdl, str. I-7633.
For instance, the Mont Parnès casino is operated, as license holder, by the private company Athens Resort Casino Holding Company S.A. (ACR).
Na primer, igralnico Mont Parnès kot imetnik dovoljenja upravlja zasebna družba Athens Resort Casino Anonymi Etaireia Symmetochon.
ACR acquired 49 % of the shares of the casino, and took over its management, after its partial privatisation in 2003 (while the public company ETA kept 51 %).
Družba Athens Resort Casino je pridobila 49 % delnic igralnice in prevzela upravljanje po delni privatizaciji igralnice leta 2003 (javna družba ETA je obdržala 51 %).
70 % of ARC is owned by the company Regency Entertainment Leisure and Tourism S.A (formerly Hyatt Regency Hotels and Tourism Thessaloniki S. A.) and the remaining 30 % by the company Ellaktor S.A. (formerly Elliniki Technodomiki S.A.) In Greece, Hyatt Regency also operates and controls Regency Casino Thessaloniki.
70 % družbe Athens Resort Casino je v lasti družbe Regency Entertainment Psychagogiki kai Touristiki AE (prej Hyatt Regency Xenodocheiaki kai Touristiki (Thessaloniki) AE), ostalih 30 % pa v lasti družbe Ellaktor AE (prej Elliniki Technodomiki AE). V Grčiji družba Hyatt Regency upravlja in nadzira tudi družbo Regency Casino Thessaloniki.
The multinational Hyatt Hotels corporation, with headquarters in Chicago, Illinois (USA) manages, franchises, owns and develops Hyatt branded hotels, resorts and residential and vacation ownership properties around the world.
Multinacionalna korporacija Hyatt Hotels s sedežem v Čikagu, Illinois, ZDA, upravlja, ustanavlja franšize, ima v lasti in razvija hotele, letovišča ter rezidenčne in počitniške lastniške objekte znamke Hyatts po vsem svetu.
As of 31 December 2010, the company’s worldwide portfolio consisted of 453 properties: full service hotels operate under the Hyatt®, Park Hyatt®, Andaz™, Grand Hyatt®, Hyatt Regency® brands; two select service brands are Hyatt Place® and Hyatt Summerfield Suites™; vacation ownership properties are developed under the Hyatt Vacation Club® brand.
31. decembra 2010 je svetovni portfelj družbe obsegal 453 objektov: hoteli s celotnimi storitvami delujejo pod znamkami Hyatt®, Park Hyatt®, Andaz™, Grand Hyatt® in Hyatt Regency®; dve znamki, ki ponujata izbrane storitve, sta Hyatt Place® in Hyatt Summerfield Suites™; počitniški lastniški objekti pa se razvijajo pod znamko Hyatt Vacation Club®.
Under the brand Hyatt Regency alone there are 9 hotels/resorts in France, UK, Germany, Greece, and Poland.
Sama znamka Hyatt Regency vključuje devet hotelov/letovišč v Franciji, Združenem kraljestvu, Nemčiji, Grčiji in na Poljskem.
Hyatt operates 4 casinos under the brand Hyatt Regency – the Thessaloniki casino and the hotel and casino Hyatt Regency Warsaw in Warsaw, Poland (2 other casinos are in South Korea and in Wisconsin, USA).
Hyatt upravlja štiri igralnice pod znamko Hyatt Regency, vključno z igralnico v Solunu ter hotelom in igralnico Hyatt Regency Warsaw v Varšavi, Poljska (druga dva sta v Južni Koreji in Winsonsinu, ZDA).
This information is available on the site – www.hyatt.com.For another example, as concerns Loutraki, the Club Hotel Casino Loutraki is a joint venture between the Municipality of Loutraki (through D.A.E.T. Loutraki S.A.) and the multinational holding company of Club Hotel Loutraki S.A., which is the administrator and chief investor in the Casino Loutraki.
Te informacije so na voljo na spletni strani www.hyatt.com.Drug primer je Lutraki: Club Hotel Casino Loutraki je skupno podjetje občine Lutraki (prek družbe DAET Loutraki AE) in multinacionalne holdinške družbe Club Hotel Loutraki AE, ki je upravljavec in glavni investitor igralnice v Lutrakiju.
According to information available on the site http://www.clubhotelloutraki.gr, significant names from the Greek and international business world participate in Club Hotel Loutraki, such as Casinos Austria International (one of the largest investors in casinos internationally, with 67 casinos in 15 countries) Piraeus Bank, EFG Eurobank Ergasias, as well as Israeli companies whose holdings include, among others, six more casinos and chains of luxury hotels.).
V skladu z informacijami, ki so na voljo na spletni strani http://www.clubhotelloutraki.gr, so med delničarji podjetja Club Hotel Loutraki pomembna imena iz grškega in mednarodnega poslovnega sveta, kot so Casinos Austria International (eden od glavnih investitorjev v igralnice na mednarodni ravni s 67 igralnicami v 15 državah), Trapeza Peiraios (Piraeus Bank), EFG Eurobank Ergasias in družbe v izraelski lasti, katerih holdinške družbe med drugim vključujejo šest dodatnih igralnic in verige prestižnih hotelov.
Sasazu – Prague, Czech Republic (Unique shareholder and sole management). This information is available via the site http://www.casinorodos.gr/.
Te informacije so na voljo na spletni strani http://www.casinorodos.gr/.
Government consultation on legislative initiative on regulation of the gambling market, summer 2010.
Vladni posvet o zakonodajni pobudi za ureditev trga iger na srečo, poletje 2010.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 October 2006, Case C-65/052006 ECR p. I-10341.
Sodba z dne 26. oktobra 2006 v zadevi C-65/05, ZOdl, str. I-10341.
See also judgement of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2009, Case C-109/08 – Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic, 2009 ECR I-4657.
Glej tudi sodbo Sodišča z dne 4. junija 2009 v zadevi C-109/08, Komisija proti Grčiji, ZOdl, str. I-4657.
See, inter alia, for precedent Commission’s practice Commission Decision 2004/76/EC of 13 May 2003, on the aid scheme implemented by France for headquarters and logistic centres, OJ L 23, 28.1.2004, p. 1, paragraph 73; see also, for a similar reasoning, Commission Decision 2003/515/EC of 17 February 2003, on the State aid implemented by the Netherlands for international financing activities, OJ L 180, 18.7.2003, p. 52, paragraph 105; Commission Decision 2004/77/EC of 24 June 2003, on the aid scheme implemented by Belgium – tax ruling system for US foreign sales corporations, OJ L 23, 28.1.2004, p. 14, paragraph 70.
Za primere prejšnje prakse Komisije glej med drugim Odločbo Komisije 2004/76/ES z dne 13. maja 2003 o shemi državne pomoči, ki jo je izvajala Francija za poveljstva in logistične centre (UL L 23, 28.1.2004, str. 1. odstavek 73). Za podobne obrazložitve glej Odločbo Komisije 2003/515/ES z dne 17. februarja 2003 o državni pomoči, ki jo izvaja Nizozemska za dejavnosti mednarodnega financiranja (UL L 180, 18.7.2003, str. 52. odstavek 105), in Odločbo Komisije 2004/77/ES z dne 24. junija 2003 o shemi pomoči, ki jo Belgija izvaja v obliki davčnega sistema odločanja, ki se uporablja za US Foreign Sales Corporations (UL L 23, 28.1.2004, str. 14. odstavek 70).
See judgement of the General Court of 4.9.2009, case T-211/05, Italy v Commission, not published yet, paragraph 173; see also judgement of the General Court of 8.6.1995, case T-459/93, Siemens v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675, paragraph 48.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 4. septembra 2009 v zadevi T-211/05, Italija proti Komisiji, ZOdl, str. II-2777, točka 173; glej tudi sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. junija 1995 v zadevi T-459/93, Siemens proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. II-1675, točka 48.
In their submission of 6 October 2010.
Stališča Grčije z dne 6. oktobra 2010.
See for instance judgment of the General Court in the Gibraltar case – joined Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01, of 30 April 2002, paragraph 130 (OJ C 169, 13.7.2002, p. 30), 2002 ECR II-2309.
Glej na primer sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 30. aprila 2002 v združenih zadevah T-195/01 in T-207/01, Gibraltar proti Komisiji (UL C 169, 13.7.2002, str. 30), Recueil, str. II-2309, točka 130.
See, inter alia, Commission Decision 2003/515/EC of 17 February 2003 on the State aid implemented by the Netherlands for international financing activities (OJ L 180, 18.7.2003, p. 52); Commission Decision 2004/76/EC of 13 May 2003 on the aid scheme implemented by France for headquarters and logistics centres (OJ L 23, 28.1.2004, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije 2003/515/ES z dne 17. februarja 2003 o državni pomoči, ki jo izvaja Nizozemska za dejavnosti mednarodnega financiranja (UL L 180, 18.7.2003, str. 52), in Odločba Komisije 2004/76/ES z dne 13. maja 2003 o shemi državne pomoči, ki jo je izvajala Francija za poveljstva in logistične centre (UL L 23, 28.1.2004, str. 1).