natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To that end, the performance of procedures that result in severe pain, suffering or distress, which is likely to be long-lasting and cannot be ameliorated, should be prohibited.
V ta namen bi bilo treba prepovedati izvajanje postopkov, ki povzročajo hude bolečine, trpljenje ali stisko, ki bodo po vsej verjetnosti dolgotrajni in jih ni mogoče izboljšati.
When developing a common format for reporting purposes, the actual severity of the pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm experienced by the animal should be taken into account rather than the predicted severity at the time of the project evaluation.
Pri pripravi splošnih obrazcev za namene poročanja bi bilo treba upoštevati dejansko težo bolečin, trpljenja, stiske ali trajnosti poškodb, ki jih žival pretrpi, namesto teže posledic, ki je bila predvidena ob oceni projekta.
The number of animals used in procedures could be reduced by performing procedures on animals more than once, where this does not detract from the scientific objective or result in poor animal welfare.
Število živali, uporabljenih v postopkih, bi bilo mogoče zmanjšati z izvajanjem postopkov na živalih več kot enkrat, če to ne odstopa od znanstvenega cilja ali nima slabega vpliva na dobro počutje živali.
However, the benefit of reusing animals should be balanced against any adverse effects on their welfare, taking into account the lifetime experience of the individual animal.
Vendar bi bilo treba koristi ponovne uporabe živali pretehtati glede na morebitne neugodne vplive na njihovo dobro počutje, pri tem pa upoštevati življenjske izkušnje posamezne živali.
As a result of this potential conflict, the reuse of animals should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Ponovno uporabo živali bi bilo zaradi tega možnega navzkrižja treba obravnavati od primera do primera.
At the end of the procedure, the most appropriate decision should be taken as regards the future of the animal on the basis of animal welfare and potential risks to the environment.
Na koncu postopka bi bilo treba na podlagi dobrega počutja živali in morebitnih tveganj za okolje sprejeti najprimernejšo odločitev za prihodnost živali.
The animals whose welfare would be compromised should be killed.
Živali, katerih dobro počutje bi bilo ogroženo, bi bilo treba usmrtiti.
In some cases, animals should be returned to a suitable habitat or husbandry system or animals such as dogs and cats should be allowed to be rehomed in families as there is a high level of public concern as to the fate of such animals.
V nekaterih primerih bi bilo treba živali vrniti v primerno naravno okolje ali rejo, živalim, kot so psi in mačke, pa bi bilo treba dovoliti ponovno nastanitev v družinskem okolju, saj obstaja visoka stopnja zaskrbljenosti javnosti o končni usodi takih živali.
Should Member States allow rehoming, it is essential that the breeder, supplier or user has a scheme in place to provide appropriate socialisation to those animals in order to ensure successful rehoming as well as to avoid unnecessary distress to the animals and to guarantee public safety.
Če bi države članice dovolile ponovno nastanitev živali v družinskem okolju, je bistveno, da imajo rejci, dobavitelji ali uporabniki načrt za ustrezno socializacijo teh živali z namenom zagotovitve uspešne ponovne nastanitve, kakor tudi za izogibanje nepotrebni stiski živali in za zagotovitev javne varnosti.
Animal tissue and organs are used for the development of in vitro methods.
Tkiva in organi živali se uporabljajo za razvoj metod in vitro.
To promote the principle of reduction, Member States should, where appropriate, facilitate the establishment of programmes for sharing the organs and tissue of animals that are killed.
Za spodbujanje načela zmanjšanja bi morale države članice, kjer je to ustrezno, olajšati vzpostavitev programov za izmenjavo organov in tkiv živali, ki so usmrčene.
The welfare of the animals used in procedures is highly dependent on the quality and professional competence of the personnel supervising procedures, as well as of those performing procedures or supervising those taking care of the animals on a daily basis.
Dobro počutje živali uporabljenih v postopkih je v veliki meri odvisno od kakovosti in strokovne usposobljenosti osebja, ki postopke nadzoruje, in tistih, ki postopke izvajajo ali nadzorujejo tiste, ki izvajajo dnevno oskrbo živali.
Member States should ensure through authorisation or by other means that staff are adequately educated, trained and competent.
Države članice bi morale preko dovoljenj ali kako drugače zagotoviti, da je osebje ustrezno izobraženo, usposobljeno in kompetentno.
Furthermore, it is important that staff are supervised until they have obtained and demonstrated the requisite competence.
Poleg tega je pomembno, da osebje dela pod nadzorom toliko časa, dokler ne pridobi in izkaže potrebnega strokovnega znanja.
Non-binding guidelines at the level of the Union concerning educational requirements would, in the long run, promote the free movement of personnel.
Nezavezujoče smernice na ravni Unije o izobrazbenih zahtevah bi na dolgi rok spodbujale prosti pretok osebja.
The establishments of breeders, suppliers and users should have adequate installations and equipment in place to meet the accommodation requirements of the animal species concerned and to allow the procedures to be performed efficiently and with the least distress to the animals.
Ustanove rejcev, dobaviteljev in uporabnikov bi morale imeti ustrezne naprave in opremo, da bi izpolnile zahteve za nastanitev zadevnih živalskih vrst in omogočile učinkovito izvajanje postopkov, pri tem pa živalim povzročile čim manjšo stisko.
The breeders, suppliers and users should operate only if they are authorised by the competent authorities.
Rejci, dobavitelji in uporabniki bi smeli obratovati samo, če imajo dovoljenje pristojnih organov.
To ensure the ongoing monitoring of animal-welfare needs, appropriate veterinary care should be available at all times and a staff member should be made responsible for the care and welfare of animals in each establishment.
Za zagotavljanje stalnega spremljanja potreb za dobro počutje živali bi morala biti ves čas na voljo ustrezna veterinarska oskrba in vsaka ustanova bi morala določiti osebo, odgovorno za oskrbo in dobro počutje živali.
Animal-welfare considerations should be given the highest priority in the context of animal keeping, breeding and use.
Pri reji, vzreji in uporabi živali bi bilo treba dobro počutje živali prednostno obravnavati.
Breeders, suppliers and users should therefore have an animal-welfare body in place with the primary task of focusing on giving advice on animal-welfare issues.
Rejci, dobavitelji in uporabniki bi tako morali ustanoviti organ za dobro počutje živali, katerega glavna naloga bi bila svetovanje glede vprašanj dobrega počutja živali.
The body should also follow the development and outcome of projects at establishment level, foster a climate of care and provide tools for the practical application and timely implementation of recent technical and scientific developments in relation to the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement, in order to enhance the life-time experience of the animals.
Ta organ bi tudi moral spremljati razvoj in rezultate projektov na ravni ustanove, gojiti ozračje oskrbe ter zagotavljati pripomočke za praktično uporabo in pravočasno uvedbo nedavnih tehničnih in znanstvenih spoznanj v zvezi z načeli zamenjave, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja, z namenom izboljšanja življenjskega izkustva živali.
The advice given by the animal-welfare body should be properly documented and open to scrutiny during inspections.
Nasveti organa za dobro počutje živali bi morali biti ustrezno dokumentirani in na voljo za preučitev med inšpekcijskimi pregledi.
In order to enable competent authorities to monitor compliance with this Directive, each breeder, supplier and user should maintain accurate records of the numbers of animals, their origins and fate.
Vsak rejec, dobavitelj in uporabnik bi moral voditi natančne evidence o številu živali, njihovem izvoru in končni usodi, da se pristojnim organom omogoči spremljanje skladnosti s to direktivo.
Non-human primates, dogs and cats should have a personal history file from birth covering their lifetimes in order to be able to receive the care, accommodation and treatment that meet their individual needs and characteristics.
Primati razen človeka, kakor tudi psi in mačke bi morali imeti od rojstva osebno kartoteko, v kateri bi se popisovalo njihovo življenje, tako da bi lahko prejeli oskrbo, nastanitev in zdravljenje, ki ustrezajo njihovim individualnim potrebam in značilnostim.
The accommodation and care of animals should be based on the specific needs and characteristics of each species.
Nastanitev in oskrba živali bi morali temeljiti na posebnih potrebah in značilnostih vsake vrste.
There are differences in the requirements for the accommodation and care of animals between Member States, which contribute to the distortion of the internal market.
Med državami članicami obstajajo razlike pri zahtevah za nastanitev in oskrbo živali, ki prispevajo k izkrivljanju notranjega trga.
Furthermore, some of those requirements no longer reflect the most recent knowledge on the impacts of accommodation and care conditions on both the animal welfare and the scientific results of procedures.
Poleg tega nekatere od teh zahtev ne odražajo več najnovejših spoznanj o vplivih pogojev pri nastanitvi in oskrbi na dobro počutje živali in o znanstvenih rezultatih postopkov.
It is therefore necessary to establish in this Directive harmonised requirements for accommodation and care.
V tej direktivi je treba zato določiti usklajene zahteve za nastanitev in oskrbo.
These requirements should be updated on the basis of scientific and technical development.
Te zahteve bi bilo treba posodabljati na podlagi znanstvenega in tehničnega razvoja.
To monitor compliance with this Directive, Member States should carry out regular inspections of breeders, suppliers and users on a risk basis.
Države članice bi morale za spremljanje skladnosti s to direktivo izvajati redne inšpekcijske preglede rejcev, dobaviteljev in uporabnikov na podlagi tveganj.
To ensure public confidence and promote transparency, an appropriate proportion of the inspections should be carried out without prior warning.
Za zagotavljanje javnega zaupanja in spodbujanja preglednosti bi bilo treba ustrezni delež inšpekcijskih pregledov opraviti brez predhodnega opozorila.
To assist the Member States in the enforcement of this Directive and on the basis of the findings in the reports on the operation of the national inspections, the Commission should, when there is reason for concern, carry out controls of the national inspection systems.
Za pomoč državam članicam pri uveljavljanju te direktive in na podlagi ugotovitev v poročilih o delovanju nacionalnih inšpekcijskih služb bi morala Komisija, kadar obstajajo razlogi za zaskrbljenost, izvajati nadzor nad nacionalnimi inšpekcijskimi sistemi.
Member States should address any weaknesses identified in the findings of these controls.
Države članice bi morale odpraviti morebitne pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene v okviru takšnega nadzora.
Comprehensive project evaluation, taking into account ethical considerations in the use of animals, forms the core of project authorisation and should ensure the implementation of principles of replacement, reduction and refinement in those projects.
Celovita ocena projekta, ki upošteva etična načela glede uporabe živali, je jedro odobritve projekta in bi morala zagotavljati izvajanje načel zamenjave, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja v teh projektih.
It is also essential, both on moral and scientific grounds, to ensure that each use of an animal is carefully evaluated as to the scientific or educational validity, usefulness and relevance of the expected result of that use.
Tako iz moralnih kot tudi iz znanstvenih razlogov je bistveno, da se zagotovi, da se vsakršna uporaba živali skrbno ovrednoti glede na znanstveno in izobraževalno utemeljenost, uporabnost in pomen pričakovanih rezultatov navedene uporabe.
The likely harm to the animal should be balanced against the expected benefits of the project.
Pričakovane poškodbe živali bi bilo treba pretehtati glede na pričakovane koristi projekta.
Therefore, an impartial project evaluation independent of those involved in the study should be carried out as part of the authorisation process of projects involving the use of live animals.
Zato bi kot del postopka za odobritev projektov, ki vključujejo uporabo živih živali, morala biti izvedena nepristranska ocena projekta, ki je neodvisna od ocen projektov, ki so vključene v študijo.
Effective implementation of a project evaluation should also allow for an appropriate assessment of the use of any new scientific experimental techniques as they emerge.
Učinkovita izvedba ocene projekta bi morala omogočiti tudi ustrezno oceno uporabe kakršnih koli novih znanstvenih poskusnih tehnik, ki se pojavijo.
Due to the nature of the project, the type of species used and the likelihood of achieving the desired objectives of the project, it might be necessary to carry out a retrospective assessment.
Glede na vrsto projekta, uporabljeno živalsko vrsto in verjetnost za dosego željenih ciljev projekta bi bilo morda potrebno izvesti retrospektivno oceno.
Since projects may vary significantly in terms of complexity, length, and the time period for obtaining the results, it is necessary that the decision on retrospective assessment should be made taking those aspects fully into account.
Glede na to, da se lahko projekti med seboj bistveno razlikujejo po zapletenosti, dolžini in časovnem obdobju za pridobitev rezultatov, bi morala biti odločitev o retrospektivni oceni sprejeta ob upoštevanju navedenih vidikov v celoti.
To ensure that the public is informed, it is important that objective information concerning projects using live animals is made publicly available.
Za zagotavljanje obveščenosti javnosti je pomembno, da so javnosti na voljo objektivni podatki glede projektov, v katerih se uporabljajo žive živali.
This should not violate proprietary rights or expose confidential information.
To ne bi smelo kršiti lastninskih pravic ali razkrivati zaupnih podatkov.
Therefore, users should provide anonymous non-technical summaries of those projects, which Member States should publish.
Uporabniki bi morali zato pripraviti anonimne netehnične povzetke teh projektov, ki bi jih morale države članice objaviti.
The published details should not breach the anonymity of the users.
Objavljene podrobnosti ne bi smele posegati v anonimnost uporabnikov.
To manage risks to human and animal health and the environment, the legislation of the Union provides that substances and products can be marketed only after appropriate safety and efficacy data have been submitted.
Za obvladovanje tveganj za zdravje ljudi in živali ter okolje je v zakonodaji Unije določeno, da je mogoče snovi in izdelke dati na trg šele potem, ko so bili predloženi ustrezni podatki o varnosti in učinkovitosti.
Some of those requirements can be fulfilled only by resorting to animal testing, hereinafter referred to as ‘regulatory testing’.
Nekatere od teh zahtev je mogoče izpolniti samo z uporabo poskusov na živalih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: predpisano preskušanje).
It is necessary to introduce specific measures in order to increase the use of alternative approaches and to eliminate unnecessary duplication of regulatory testing.
Uvesti je treba posebne ukrepe za povečanje uporabe alternativnih pristopov in za odpravo nepotrebnega podvajanja predpisanega preskušanja.
For that purpose Member States should recognise the validity of test data produced using test methods provided for under the legislation of the Union.
Države članice bi zato morale priznati veljavnost preskusnih podatkov, pridobljenih z uporabo preskusnih metod, predpisanih z zakonodajo Unije.
To reduce the administrative workload and enhance the competitiveness of research and industry in the Union, it should be possible to authorise multiple generic projects when carried out using established methods for testing, diagnostic or production purposes under one group authorisation, albeit without exempting any of these procedures from the project evaluation.
Za zmanjšanje upravne delovne obremenitve ter izboljšanje konkurenčnosti raziskovalne dejavnosti in industrije v Uniji bi morala obstajati možnost odobritve večkratnih generičnih projektov, če uporabljajo uveljavljene metode za testiranje, diagnosticiranje ali proizvodnjo, z eno skupinsko odobritvijo, ne da bi bili ti postopki izvzeti iz ocene projekta.
To ensure effective examination of authorisation applications and to enhance the competitiveness of research and industry in the Union, a time-limit should be set for the competent authorities to evaluate project proposals and take decisions on the authorisation of such projects.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega preučevanja vlog za izdajo odobritve ter izboljšanje konkurenčnosti raziskovalne dejavnosti in industrije v Uniji bi moral biti za pristojne organe opredeljen rok za oceno predlogov projektov in sprejetje odločitev o odobritvi takih projektov.
In order not to compromise the quality of the project evaluation, additional time might be required for more complex project proposals due to the number of disciplines involved, the novel characteristics and more complex techniques of the proposed project.
Da se ne ogrozi kakovosti ocene projekta, je za bolj zahtevne predloge projektov morda potreben daljši rok zaradi velikega števila vključenih disciplin, novih značilnosti in bolj zapletenih tehnik pri predlaganem projektu.
However, the extension of deadlines for project evaluation should remain the exception.
Kljub temu bi moralo podaljševanje rokov za oceno projekta ostati izjema.
Given the routine or repetitive nature of certain procedures, it is appropriate to provide for a regulatory option whereby the Member States could introduce a simplified administrative procedure for the evaluation of projects containing such procedures, provided certain requirements laid down in this Directive are complied with.
Glede na rutinsko ali ponavljajočo se naravo določenih postopkov je primerno zagotoviti regulativno možnost, preko katere bi države članice lahko uvedle poenostavljen upravni postopek za oceno projektov, ki zajema takšne postopke, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjene določene zahteve iz te direktive.
The availability of alternative methods is highly dependent on the progress of the research into the development of alternatives.
Razpoložljivost alternativnih metod je v veliki meri odvisna od doseženega napredka raziskav za razvoj alternativnih metod.
The Community Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development provided increasing funding for projects which aim to replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in procedures.
Okvirni programi Skupnosti za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj zagotavljajo povečano financiranje za projekte, katerih cilj je zamenjava, zmanjšanje in izboljšanje uporabe živali v postopkih.
In order to increase competitiveness of research and industry in the Union and to replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in procedures, the Commission and the Member States should contribute through research and by other means to the development and validation of alternative approaches.
Za povečanje konkurenčnosti raziskovalne dejavnosti in industrije v Uniji in za zamenjavo, zmanjšanje in izboljšanje uporabe živali v postopkih, bi morale Komisija in države članice preko raziskav in drugih sredstev prispevati k razvoju in validaciji alternativnih pristopov.
The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods, a policy action within the Joint Research Centre of the Commission, has coordinated the validation of alternative approaches in the Union since 1991.
Evropski center za validacijo alternativnih metod, oblikovan kot politični ukrep v okviru Skupnega raziskovalnega središča Komisije, od leta 1991 usklajuje validacijo alternativnih pristopov v Uniji.
However, there is an increasing need for new methods to be developed and proposed for validation, which requires a reference laboratory of the Union for the validation of alternative methods to be established formally.
Povečuje se potreba po razvoju novih metod in vedno več je predlogov za njihovo validacijo, zaradi česar je potrebna uradna ustanovitev Referenčnega laboratorija Unije za validacijo alternativnih metod.
This laboratory should be referred to as the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM).
Pri sklicevanju na ta laboratorij bi bilo treba uporabiti naziv Evropski center za validacijo alternativnih metod (ECVAM).
It is necessary for the Commission to cooperate with the Member States when setting priorities for validation studies.
Komisija mora pri določanju prednostnih nalog za študije validacije sodelovati z državami članicami.
The Member States should assist the Commission in identifying and nominating suitable laboratories to carry out such validation studies.
Države članice bi morale Komisiji pomagati pri določanju in imenovanju ustreznih laboratorijev za opravljanje takšnih študij validacije.
For validation studies that are similar to previously validated methods and in respect of which a validation represents a significant competitive advantage, ECVAM should be able to collect charges from those who submit their methods for validation.
Za študije validacije, ki so podobne predhodno potrjenim metodam in z ozirom na katere validacija pomeni precejšnjo konkurenčno prednost, bi ECVAM moral imeti pristojnost zaračunati pristojbino tistim, ki svoje metode predložijo v validacijo.
Such charges should not be prohibitive of healthy competition in the testing industry.
Takšne pristojbine ne bi smele omejevati zdrave konkurence na področju industrije preskušanja.
There is a need to ensure a coherent approach to project evaluation and review strategies at national level.
Obstaja potreba za zagotovitev skladnega pristopa glede ocen projektov in strategij pregledov na nacionalni ravni.
Member States should establish national committees for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes to give advice to the competent authorities and animal-welfare bodies in order to promote the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement.
Države članice bi morale ustanoviti nacionalne odbore za varstvo živali, ki se uporabljajo v znanstvene namene, ki bi pristojnim organom in organom za dobro počutje živali svetovali in tako spodbujali načela zamenjave, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja.
A network of national committees should play a role in the exchange of best practice at the level of the Union.
Mreža nacionalnih odborov bi morala sodelovati pri izmenjavi najboljših praks na ravni Unije.
Technical and scientific advancements in biomedical research can be rapid, as can the increase in knowledge of factors influencing animal welfare.
Tehnični in znanstveni napredek v biomedicinskih raziskavah je lahko hiter in ravno tako hitro se lahko poveča znanje o dejavnikih, ki vplivajo na dobro počutje živali.
It is therefore necessary to provide for a review of this Directive.
Zato je treba predvideti pregled te direktive.
Such review should examine the possible replacement of the use of animals, and in particular non-human primates, as a matter of priority where it is possible, taking into account the advancement of science.
Tak pregled bi po možnosti moral prednostno preučiti morebitno zamenjavo uporabe živali in zlasti primatov razen človeka, pri tem pa upoštevati napredek znanosti.
The Commission should also conduct periodic thematic reviews concerning the replacement, reduction and refinement of the use of animals in procedures.
Komisija bi tudi morala izvajati periodične tematske preglede glede zamenjave, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja uporabe živali v postopkih.