natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission declares that it intends to apply a methodology which will give approximately equal weight to the first two criteria, whilst the third criterion will be used as a development coefficient.
Komisija izjavlja, da namerava uporabiti metodologijo, ki bo približno enakomerno uravnotežila prvi dve merili, tretje merilo pa bo uporabljeno kot razvojni koeficient.
The objective of this methodology is to give equivalent importance across all beneficiary countries to their level of trade in bananas with the European Union and the importance of banana exports to the Union to the economies of each beneficiary country.
Cilj te metodologije je v vseh državah upravičenkah dati enak pomen naslednjima dvema meriloma: obsegu trgovanja z bananami z Evropsko unijo in pomenu izvoza banan v Unijo za gospodarstvo vsake države upravičenke.
The relative level of development will modulate the allocations in favour of countries with lower development levels, in line with the Union's development objectives as set out in the Treaties and the DCI.
Dodelitev sredstev se bo v skladu z razvojnimi cilji Unije, kot so določeni v Pogodbah in instrumentu za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja, ravnala po relativni razvojni stopnji v korist držav z nižjimi razvojnimi stopnjami.
The measures should take into consideration the expected development of the banana export sector and aim to provide for social resilience policies, economic diversification or investment to improve competitiveness, where this is viable, taking into account the results of and experiences gained through the Special System of Assistance (SSA) to traditional ACP suppliers of bananas established in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 2686/94 [3] and the Special Framework of Assistance (SFA) for traditional ACP suppliers of bananas established in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 856/1999 [4] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1609/1999 [5].
Ukrepi bi morali upoštevati pričakovani razvoj sektorja izvoza banan in biti usmerjeni v zagotavljanje politik socialne prožnosti, gospodarske diverzifikacije ali naložb za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti, kjer je to ustrezno, hkrati pa upoštevati rezultate in izkušnje, pridobljene s posebnim sistemom pomoči (SSA) za tradicionalne dobavitelje banan iz držav AKP, vzpostavljenim v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2686/94 [3], ter s posebnim okvirom pomoči (SFA) za tradicionalne dobavitelje banan iz držav AKP, vzpostavljenim v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 856/1999 [4] in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1609/1999 [5].
The Union acknowledges the importance of promoting a more equitable distribution of banana revenues.
Unija priznava pomen spodbujanja pravičnejše porazdelitve dohodkov od banan.
The Commission in its Communication: A budget for Europe 2020 (COM (2011) 500), states that:"Furthermore, the future legal bases for the different instruments will propose the extensive use of delegated acts to allow for more flexibility in the management of the policies during the financing period, while respecting the prerogatives of the two branches of legislator."and"It is considered that democratic scrutiny of external aid must be improved.
Komisija v svojem sporočilu Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020 (COM(2011) 500) izjavlja, da:„Poleg tega bo prihodnja pravna podlaga za različne instrumente predlagala obsežno uporabo delegiranih aktov, kar bo omogočilo večjo prožnosti pri upravljanju politik v obdobju financiranja, a bo pri tem upoštevala posebne pravice obeh vej zakonodajne oblasti.“in:„Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je treba izboljšati demokratično presojo zunanje pomoči. To se lahko doseže z uporabo delegiranih aktov skladno s členom 290 Pogodbe za nekatere vidike programov, s čimer bi bili sozakonodajalcema zagotovljeni enaki pogoji, načrtovanje pa bi bilo prožnejše. Predlaga se, naj se presoja evropskega razvojnega sklada uskladi z instrumentom za razvojno sodelovanje, vendar naj se upoštevajo posebnosti tega instrumenta.“
Regulation (EU) No 1342/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1342/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 as regards the inclusion of the Kaliningrad oblast and certain Polish administrative districts in the eligible border area
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1931/2006 v zvezi z vključitvijo Kaliningrajske oblasti in določenih poljskih upravnih okrožij v obmejno območje
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular point (b) of Article 77(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti točke (b) člena 77(2) Pogodbe,
Union rules on local border traffic, established by Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 laying down rules on local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States and amending the provisions of the Schengen Convention [2], in force since 2007, have avoided creating barriers to trade, to social and cultural interchange or to regional cooperation with neighbouring countries, while preserving the security of the entire Schengen area.
Pravila Unije o obmejnem prometu iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1931/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o pravilih za obmejni promet na zunanjih kopenskih mejah držav članic in spremembi določb Schengenske konvencije [2], ki velja od leta 2007, zagotavljajo, da meje ne ovirajo trgovine, socialne in kulturne izmenjave ali regionalnega sodelovanja s sosednjimi državami, obenem pa zagotavljajo varnost celotnega schengenskega območja.
The Kaliningrad oblast has an exceptional geographic situation: as a relatively small area completely surrounded by two Member States, it constitutes the only enclave in the European Union; its shape and the distribution of its population are such that applying the standard rules on the definition of the border area would artificially divide the enclave, whereby some inhabitants would enjoy facilitations for local border traffic while the majority, including the inhabitants of the city of Kaliningrad, would not.
Kaliningrajska oblast ima izjemno geografsko lego: kot relativno majhno območje, ki ga popolnoma obkrožata dve državi članici, je edina enklava v Evropski uniji; zaradi njegove oblike in porazdelitve prebivalstva bi uporaba standardne opredelitve obmejnega območja umetno razdelila enklavo, saj bi nekateri prebivalci uživali olajšave v zvezi z obmejnim prometom, večina, vključno s prebivalci mesta Kaliningrad, pa ne.
In the light of the homogeneous nature of the Kaliningrad oblast, for trade, social and cultural interchange and regional cooperation to be enhanced, a specific exception to Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 should be introduced that would allow the entire Kaliningrad oblast to be considered as a border area.
Glede na homogeno naravo Kaliningrajske oblasti in za okrepitev trgovine, socialne in kulturne izmenjave ter regionalnega sodelovanja bi bilo treba v Uredbo (ES) št. 1931/2006 uvesti posebno izjemo, da bi se celotno območje Kaliningrajske oblasti štelo za obmejno območje.
A specific border area on the Polish side should also be recognised as an eligible border area, in order for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 in that region to have real effect through increased opportunities for trade, social and cultural interchange and regional cooperation between the Kaliningrad oblast on the one hand and major centres in the North of Poland on the other.
Da bi se z uporabo Uredbe (ES) št. 1931/2006 v navedeni regiji dosegel dejanski učinek z več priložnostmi za trgovino, socialno in kulturno izmenjavo ter regionalno sodelovanje med Kaliningrajsko oblastjo na eni strani in velikimi centri na severu Poljske na drugi, bi bilo treba za obmejno območje šteti tudi posebno obmejno območje na poljski strani.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the general definition of the border area and to full respect for the rules and conditions set out in Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006, including the penalties to be imposed by Member States on border residents who abuse the local border traffic regime.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na splošno opredelitev obmejnega območja ter popolno spoštovanje pravil in pogojev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1931/2006, vključno s kaznimi, ki jih države članice uporabijo zoper obmejne prebivalce v primeru zlorabe režima obmejnega prometa.
This Regulation contributes to further promoting the strategic partnership between the European Union and the Russian Federation, in line with the priorities set out in the Roadmap of the Common Space on Freedom, Security and Justice, and takes into account the overall relationship between the European Union and the Russian Federation.
Ta uredba prispeva k nadaljnjemu spodbujanju strateškega partnerstva med Evropsko unijo in Rusko federacijo v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami, ki so določene v časovnem načrtu za skupni prostor svobode, varnosti in pravice, ter upošteva splošne odnose med Evropsko unijo in Rusko federacijo.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the inclusion of the Kaliningrad oblast and certain Polish administrative districts in the eligible border area, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te uredbe, namreč vključitve Kaliningrajske oblasti in določenih poljskih upravnih okrožij v obmejno območje, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego navedenega cilja.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [4].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [3], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo tega sporazuma [4].
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [6].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [6].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [7] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/350/EU [8].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [7], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2011/350/EU [8].
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
Given that this Regulation builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of 6 months after the Council has decided on this Regulation whether it will implement it in its national law.
Ker ta uredba nadgrajuje schengenski pravni red, se Danska v skladu s členom 4 navedenega protokola v šestih mesecih po tem, ko je Svet sprejel ukrep glede te uredbe, odloči, ali bo to uredbo prenesla v svoje nacionalno pravo.
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [9]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [9]; Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [10]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [10]; Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja –
Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1931/2006 se spremeni:
at the end of Article 3, point (2), the following sentence is added:
za zadnjim stavkom točke 2 člena 3 se doda naslednji stavek:
‘The areas listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be considered as part of the border area;’;
„Območja, navedena v Prilogi k tej uredbi, se štejejo za del obmejnega območja;“;
the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation is added as an Annex.
besedilo iz Priloge k tej uredbi se doda kot Priloga.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Position of the European Parliament of 1 December 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Decision of the Council of 12 December 2011.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 1. decembra 2011 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2011.
Kaliningrad oblast
Kaliningrajska oblast.
Polish administrative districts (powiaty) of województwo pomorskie: pucki, m. Gdynia, m. Sopot, m. Gdańsk, gdański, nowodworski, malborski
Poljska upravna okrožja (powiaty) v województwo pomorskie: pucki, m. Gdynia, m. Sopot, m. Gdańsk, gdański, nowodworski, malborski.
Polish administrative districts (powiaty) of województwo warmińsko-mazurskie: m. Elbląg, elbląski, braniewski, lidzbarski, bartoszycki, m. Olsztyn, olsztyński, kętrzyński, mrągowski, węgorzewski, giżycki, gołdapski, olecki’.
Poljska upravna okrožja (powiaty) v województwo warmińsko-mazurskie: m. Elbląg, elbląski, braniewski, lidzbarski, bartoszycki, m. Olsztyn, olsztyński, kętrzyński, mrągowski, węgorzewski, giżycki, gołdapski, olecki.“
Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1343/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea
o nekaterih določbah za ribolov na območju Sporazuma GFCM (Generalne komisije za ribištvo v Sredozemlju) in spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1967/2006 o ukrepih za upravljanje za trajnostno izkoriščanje ribolovnih virov v Sredozemskem morju
The European Community acceded to the Agreement for the establishment of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM Agreement) pursuant to Council Decision 98/416/EC of 16 June 1998 on the accession of the European Community to the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean [3] (GFCM).
(1) Evropska skupnost je pristopila k Sporazumu o ustanovitvi Generalne komisije za ribištvo v Sredozemlju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum GFCM) v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 98/416/ES z dne 16. junija 1998 o pristopu Evropske skupnosti h Generalni komisiji za ribištvo v Sredozemlju [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: GFCM).
The GFCM Agreement provides an appropriate framework for multilateral cooperation to promote the development, conservation, rational management and best utilisation of living marine resources in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea at levels which are considered sustainable and at low risk of collapse.
Sporazum GFCM zagotavlja ustrezen okvir za večstransko sodelovanje za spodbujanje razvoja, ohranitve, smotrnega upravljanja in najboljšega izkoriščanja živih morskih virov v Sredozemlju in Črnem morju v obsegu, ki velja za trajnostnega in predstavlja majhno tveganje za njihovo izčrpanje.
The European Union, as well as Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Cyprus, Malta, Romania and Slovenia are contracting parties to the GFCM Agreement.
(3) Evropska unija ter Bolgarija, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Ciper, Malta, Romunija in Slovenija so pogodbenice Sporazuma GFCM.
Recommendations adopted by the GFCM are binding on its contracting parties.
Priporočila, ki jih sprejme GFCM, so za pogodbenice zavezujoča.
As the Union is a contracting party to the GFCM Agreement, these recommendations are binding on the Union and should therefore be implemented in Union law unless their content is already covered thereby.
Ker je Unija pogodbenica Sporazuma GFCM, so ta priporočila zanjo zavezujoča in bi jih zato bilo treba prenesti v pravo Unije, razen če je njihova vsebina v njem že zajeta.
At its Annual Sessions in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 the GFCM adopted a number of recommendations and resolutions for certain fisheries in the GFCM Agreement area which have been temporarily implemented in Union law by the annual Regulations on fishing opportunities or, in the case of GFCM Recommendations 2005/1 and 2005/2, by Article 4(3) and Article 24 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 [4].
Na letnih sejah v letih 2005, 2006, 2007 in 2008 je GFCM sprejel številna priporočila in resolucije za določene vrste ribolova na območju Sporazuma GFCM, ki so bila začasno prenesena v pravo Unije z letnimi uredbami o ribolovnih možnostih ali, v primeru priporočil GFCM 2005/1 in 2005/2, s členom 4(3) in členom 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 1967/2006 [4].
For reasons of clarity, simplification and legal certainty, and since the permanent character of recommendations requires also a permanent legal instrument for their implementation in Union law, it is appropriate to implement these recommendations via a single legislative act, where future recommendations can be added by way of amendments to that act.
Zaradi jasnosti, poenostavitve in pravne varnosti ter ker trajna narava priporočil za njihov prenos v pravo Unije terja prav tako trajni pravni instrument, je primerno, da se ta priporočila prenesejo z enim samim zakonodajnim aktom, v katerega se prihodnja priporočila lahko dodajo v obliki sprememb tega akta.
GFCM recommendations apply to the entire GFCM Agreement area, that is the Mediterranean and the Black Sea and connecting waters, as defined in the preamble to the GFCM Agreement, and therefore, for reasons of clarity and legal certainty, they should be implemented in a single separate Regulation rather than through amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 which covers only the Mediterranean Sea.
Priporočila GFCM se uporabljajo za celotno območje Sporazuma GFCM, to je Sredozemlje in Črno morje ter sosednje vode, kakor je opredeljeno v preambuli Sporazuma GFCM, zato bi jih bilo treba zaradi jasnosti in pravne varnosti prenesti v eni sami ločeni uredbi in ne s spremembami Uredbe (ES) št. 1967/2006, ki zajema le Sredozemsko morje.
Certain provisions contained in Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 should apply not only to the Mediterranean Sea but to the entire GFCM Agreement area.
Nekatere določbe iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1967/2006 bi se morale uporabljati ne le za Sredozemsko morje, temveč za celotno območje Sporazuma GFCM.
Those provisions should therefore be deleted from Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 and included in this Regulation.
Te določbe bi bilo zato treba črtati iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1967/2006 in jih vključiti v to uredbo.
In addition, certain provisions regarding minimum mesh size that are laid down in that Regulation should be further clarified.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba podrobneje pojasniti nekatere določbe o najmanjši velikosti mrežnega očesa iz navedene uredbe.
The ‘fisheries restricted areas’ established by GFCM recommendations for spatial management measures are equivalent to the ‘fishing protected areas’ as used in Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006.
„Zaprta območja za ribolov“, vzpostavljena s priporočili GFCM za ukrepe za upravljanje prostora, so enakovredna „ribolovnim zavarovanim območjem“ iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1967/2006.
At its Annual Session of 23 to 27 March 2009 the GFCM adopted, on the basis of scientific advice by the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC), contained in the report of its 11th session (FAO report No 890), a recommendation on the establishment of a fisheries restricted area in the Gulf of Lions.
GFCM je na letni seji od 23. do 27. marca 2009 na podlagi znanstvenega mnenja Znanstvenega svetovalnega odbora (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SAC), ki je vsebovano v poročilu o njegovi enajsti seji (poročilo FAO št. 890), sprejel priporočilo o vzpostavitvi zaprtega območja za ribolov v Levjem zalivu.
It is appropriate to implement this measure by means of a fishing effort management system.
Primerno je, da se ta ukrep izvede s pomočjo sistema upravljanja ribolovnega napora.
In Mediterranean mixed fisheries, the selectivity of some fishing gears cannot be permitted to go beyond a certain level.
Pri mešanem ribolovu v Sredozemlju se ne more dopustiti, da bi selektivnost nekaterih ribolovnih orodij presegla določeno raven.