natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Signers are referred to applicable national laws, and for the purposes of guidelines to ETSI TS 102 176 [8] and to the ECRYPT2 D.SPA.x report [9] for further recommendations on algorithms and parameters eligible for electronic signatures.The signed attributes MUST include a reference to the signer’s X.509 v3 digital certificate (RFC 5035) and SignedData.certificates field MUST include its value.
Podpisniki se sklicujejo na veljavne nacionalne zakone ter za namene smernic na ETSI TS 102176 [8] in poročilo ECRYPT2 D.SPA.x [9] za nadaljnja priporočila glede algoritmov in parametrov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za elektronski podpis.Lastnosti podpisa MORAJO vključevati sklicevanje na digitalno potrdilo X.509 v3 podpisnika (RFC 5035), polje SignedData.certificates pa MORA vključevati njegovo vrednost.
The SigningTime signed attribute MUST be present and MUST contain the UTC expressed as in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5652#section-11.3.
Lastnost podpisa SigningTime MORA biti navedena in MORA vključevati UTC, ki je izražen, kot določa http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5652#section-11.3.
The ContentType signed attribute MUST be present and contains id-data (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5652#section-4) where the data content type is intended to refer to arbitrary octet strings, such as UTF-8 text or ZIP container with MimeType sub-element.
Lastnost podpisa ContentType MORA biti navedena in vključuje id-data (opredelitev podatkov) (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5652#section-4), kadar naj bi se tip vsebine podatkov skliceval na poljubni znakovni niz, na primer besedilo UTF-8 ali vsebnik ZIP s podrejenim elementom MimeType.
SECTION 3 — PAdES-PART 3 (BES/EPES)
ODDELEK 3 – PAdES-DEL 3 (BES/EPES)
The signature MUST use a PAdES-BES (or -EPES) signature extension as specified in the ETSI TS 102 778 PAdES-Part3 specifications [10] and complies with the following additional specifications:
Podpis MORA uporabljati razširitev podpisa PAdES-BES (ali -EPES), kot določajo specifikacije ETSI TS 102778 PAdES-del 3 [10], in je v skladu z naslednjimi dodatnimi specifikacijami:
Signers are referred to applicable national laws, and for the purposes of guidelines, to ETSI TS 102 176 [11] and to the ECRYPT2 D.SPA.x report [12] for further recommendations on algorithms and parameters eligible for electronic signatures.The signed attributes MUST include a reference to the signer’s X.509 v3 digital certificate (RFC 5035) and SignedData.certificates field MUST include its value.
Podpisniki se sklicujejo na veljavne nacionalne zakone ter za namene smernic na ETSI TS 102176 [11] in poročilo ECRYPT2 D.SPA.x [12] za nadaljnja priporočila glede algoritmov in parametrov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za elektronski podpis.Lastnosti podpisa MORAJO vključevati sklicevanje na digitalno potrdilo X.509 v3 podpisnika (RFC 5035), polje SignedData.certificates pa MORA vključevati njegovo vrednost.
The time of signing is indicated by the value of the M entry in the signature dictionary.
Čas podpisa je izražen z vrednostjo vnosa M v slovar podpisa.
In case the signatures used by Member States are based on a qualified certificate, the PKI objects (certificate chains, revocation data, time-stamps) that are included in the signatures are verifiable using the Trusted List, in accordance with Decision 2009/767/EC, of the Member State who is supervising or accrediting the CSP having issued the signatory’s certificate.
Če podpisi, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, temeljijo na kvalificiranem potrdilu, je mogoče elemente PKI (verige potrdil, podatke o preklicu, časovne žige), ki so vključeni v podpise, v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2009/767/ES preveriti z uporabo zanesljivega seznama države članice, ki nadzira ali akreditira overitelja, ki je izdal potrdilo podpisnika.
IETF RFC 2119: ‘Key words for use in RFCs to indicate Requirements Levels’.
IETF RFC 2119: „Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirements Levels“.
ETSI TS 101 903 v1.4.1: XML Advanced Electronic Signatures (XAdES).
ETSI TS 101903 v1.4.1: XML Advanced Electronic Signatures (XAdES).
ETSI TS 102 176: Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Algorithms and Parameters for Secure Electronic Signatures; Part 1: Hash functions and asymmetric algorithms; Part 2: ‘Secure channel protocols and algorithms for signature creation devices’.
ETSI TS 102176: Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Algorithms and Parameters for Secure Electronic Signatures; Part 1: Hash functions and asymmetric algorithms; Part 2: „Secure channel protocols and algorithms for signature creation devices“.
Latest version is D.SPA.13 ECRYPT2 Yearly Report on Algorithms and Key sizes (2009 to 2010), dated 30 March 2010 (http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/documents/D.SPA.13.pdf).
Najnovejša različica je D.SPA.13 ECRYPT2 Yearly Report on Algorithms and Key sizes (2009-2010) z dne 30. marca 2010 (http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/documents/D.SPA.13.pdf).
Base64 encoding (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#base64);
kodiranje Base64 (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#base64);
Filtering:
Filtriranje:
IETF, RFC 5652, Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS), http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5652.IETF, RFC 5035, Enhanced Security Services (ESS) Update: Adding CertID Algorithm Agility, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5035.IETF, RFC 3161, Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP), http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3161.
IETF, RFC 5652, Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS), http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5652.IETF, RFC 5035, Enhanced Security Services (ESS) Update: Adding CertID Algorithm Agility, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5035.IETF, RFC 3161 internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP), http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3161.
ETSI TS 101 733 v.1.8.1: CMS Advanced Electronic Signatures (CAdES).
ETSI TS 101733 v.1.8.1: CMS Advanced Electronic Signatures (CAdES).
amending Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC as regards the inclusion of Fiji in the list of third countries and territories from which imports of fishery products for human consumption are permitted
o spremembi Priloge II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES glede vključitve Fidžija na seznam tretjih držav in ozemelj, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov za prehrano ljudi
In particular, it provides that products of animal origin are only to be imported from a third country or a part of a third country that appears on a list drawn up in accordance with that Regulation.
Zlasti določa, da se proizvodi živalskega izvora uvažajo samo iz tretje države ali dela tretje države, ki je na seznamu, sestavljenem v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 also provides that when drawing up and updating such lists, account is to be taken of Union controls in third countries and guarantees by the competent authorities of third countries as regards compliance or equivalence with Union feed and food law and animal health rules specified in Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules [2].
Uredba (ES) št. 854/2004 določa tudi, da je treba pri sestavljanju in posodabljanju takih seznamov upoštevati nadzor Unije v tretjih državah in jamstva pristojnih organov tretjih držav v zvezi s skladnostjo ali enakovrednostjo z zahtevami iz zakonodaje Unije o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali iz Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali [2].
Commission Decision 2006/766/EC of 6 November 2006 establishing the lists of third countries and territories from which imports of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates, marine gastropods and fishery products are permitted [3] lists those third countries which satisfy the criteria referred to in Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 and are therefore able to guarantee that export of those products to the Union meet the sanitary conditions laid down in Union legislation to protect the health of consumers.
Odločba Komisije 2006/766/ES z dne 6. novembra 2006 o določitvi seznamov tretjih držav in ozemelj, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz školjk, iglokožcev, plaščarjev, morskih polžev in ribiških proizvodov [3], vsebuje seznam tistih tretjih držav, ki izpolnjujejo merila iz Uredbe (ES) št. 854/2004 in zato lahko jamčijo, da navedeni proizvodi, izvoženi v Unijo, izpolnjujejo predpisane sanitarne pogoje iz zakonodaje Unije za varovanje zdravja potrošnikov.
In particular, Annex II to that Decision sets out a list of third countries from which imports of fishery products for human consumption are permitted.
V Prilogi II k navedeni odločbi je seznam tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov za prehrano ljudi.
Fiji is not currently included in the list in Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC as a third country from which imports of fishery products intended for human consumption are permitted.
Fidži trenutno ni vključen na seznam iz Priloge II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES kot tretja država, iz katere je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov za prehrano ljudi.
Union controls to evaluate the control system in place in Fiji governing the production of fishery products intended for export to the Union, the last of which took place in September 2010, together with guarantees provided by the competent authority of Fiji, indicate that the conditions applicable in that third country to fishery products for human consumption destined for export to the Union are equivalent to those laid down in the relevant Union legislation.
Nadzor Unije za oceno sistema nadzora, ki se uporablja na Fidžiju za nadzor ribiških proizvodov za izvoz v Unijo, zadnji tak nadzor je bil opravljen septembra 2010, skupaj z jamstvi pristojnih organov Fidžija zagotavlja, da so pogoji, ki se v navedeni tretji državi uporabljajo za ribiške proizvode za prehrano ljudi za izvoz v Unijo, enakovredni pogojem iz ustrezne zakonodaje Unije.
Accordingly, Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC should be amended in order to permit imports from Fiji of fishery products for human consumption.
Zato je treba Prilogo II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES spremeniti, da se dovoli uvoz iz Fidžija ribiških proizvodov za prehrano ljudi.
In Annex II to Decision 2006/766/EC, the following entry for Fiji is inserted before the entry for the Falkland Islands:
V Prilogi II k Odločbi 2006/766/ES se pred vnosom za Falklandske otoke vstavi vnos za Fidži:
of 28 February 2011
z dne 28. februarja 2011
on a Union financial contribution to a programme for the control of organisms harmful to plants and plant products in the French overseas departments for 2011
o finančnem prispevku Unije za program nadzora organizmov, škodljivih za rastline in rastlinske proizvode, v francoskih čezmorskih departmajih za leto 2011
The French authorities have submitted to the Commission a programme for 2011 providing for plant health measures in the French overseas departments.
Pristojni organi Francije so Komisiji predložili program ukrepov zdravstvenega varstva rastlin v francoskih čezmorskih departmajih za leto 2011.
That programme specifies the objectives to be achieved, the expected deliverables, the measures to be carried out, their duration and their cost with a view to a possible Union financial contribution.
V navedenem programu so zaradi možnega finančnega prispevka Unije navedeni predvideni cilji, pričakovani rezultati, načrtovani ukrepi, trajanje programov ter stroški programov.
The measures provided for in that programme fulfil the requirements of Commission Decision 2007/609/EC of 10 September 2007 on the definition of the measures eligible for Community financing in the programmes for the control of organisms harmful to plants and plant products in the French overseas departments, in the Azores and in Madeira [2].
Ukrepi iz navedenega programa izpolnjujejo zahteve Odločbe Komisije 2007/609/ES z dne 10. septembra 2007 o opredelitvi ukrepov, upravičenih do financiranja Skupnosti v programih za nadzor organizmov, škodljivih za rastline in rastlinske proizvode, v francoskih prekomorskih departmajih, na Azorih in Madeiri [2].
The Commission therefore considers that that programme meets the requirements of Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 247/2006.
Komisija zato meni, da navedeni program izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 17(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 247/2006.
In accordance with Article 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 247/2006, an appropriate maximum to the Union financial contribution should be set, and payment should be made on the basis of documentation provided by France.
V skladu s členom 17(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 247/2006 je treba določiti ustrezni najvišji finančni prispevek Unije, plačilo pa je treba izvršiti na podlagi dokumentacije, ki jo predloži Francija.
In accordance with Article 3(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [3], Union financial contributions to plant-health measures are to be financed from the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund.
V skladu s členom 3(2)(a) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [3] se finančni prispevki Unije za ukrepe zdravstvenega varstva rastlin financirajo iz Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada.
In accordance with Article 75 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [4] and Article 90(1) of Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], the commitment of expenditure from the Union budget shall be preceded by a financing decision adopted by the institution or the authorities to which powers have been delegated, setting out the essential elements of the action involving the expenditure.
V skladu s členom 75 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [4], in členom 90(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], mora institucija ali organi, na katere je ta institucija prenesla pooblastila, za prevzem obveznosti za izdatke v breme proračuna Unije pred odobritvijo izdatkov sprejeti sklep o financiranju, ki določi bistvene sestavine ukrepa, ki zahteva izdatke.
This decision constitutes a financing decision for the expenditure provided in the co-financing request, as laid down in the programme submitted by France.
Ta sklep je sklep o financiranju za odhodek iz zahtevka za sofinanciranje, kot je določeno v programu, ki ga je predložila Francija.
A Union financial contribution to France for the official programme for the control of organisms harmful to plants and plant products in the French overseas departments for 2011, as specified in Part A of the Annex, is approved.
Odobri se finančni prispevek Unije za Francijo za leto 2011 za uradni program nadzora organizmov, škodljivih za rastline in rastlinske proizvode, v francoskih čezmorskih departmajih, kot je določeno v delu A Priloge.
It shall be limited to a maximum of 60 % of the total eligible expenditure, as specified in Part B of the Annex, with a maximum of EUR 165000 (VAT excluded).
Prispevek se omeji na največ 60 % skupnih upravičenih izdatkov, pri čemer je največji znesek 165000 EUR (brez DDV), kot je opredeljeno v delu B Priloge.
An advance of EUR 100000 shall be paid within 60 days after receipt of a request for payment by France.
V 60 dneh po prejemu zahtevka za plačilo, ki ga predloži Francija, se izplača predplačilo v višini 100000 EUR.
The balance of the Union financial contribution shall be paid provided that a final implementation report on the programme is submitted to the Commission in electronic form by 15 March 2012 at the latest.
Preostali znesek finančnega prispevka Unije se izplača pod pogojem, da se Komisiji najpozneje do 15. marca 2012 predloži končno poročilo o izvajanju programa v elektronski obliki.
That report shall contain at least:
Navedeno poročilo vsebujejo vsaj:
a concise technical evaluation of the entire programme, including the degree of achievement of physical and qualitative objectives and the progress accomplished, and an assessment of the immediate phytosanitary and economic impact; and
jedrnato tehnično oceno celotnega programa, vključno s stopnjo uresničitve fizičnih in kakovostnih ciljev ter doseženega napredka, in oceno takojšnjega fitosanitarnega in gospodarskega učinka, in
With respect to the indicative budget breakdown specified in Part B of the Annex, France may adjust the financing between different measures in the same sub-programme within a limit of 15 % of the Union financial contribution to this sub-programme, provided that the total amount of eligible costs scheduled in the programme is not exceeded and that the main objectives of the programme are not thereby compromised.
V zvezi z okvirno razčlenitvijo proračuna iz dela B Priloge lahko Francija do 15 % finančnega prispevka Unije za podprogram prerazporedi med različnimi ukrepi istega podprograma, če skupni znesek upravičenih stroškov, načrtovanih v programu, ni presežen in glavni cilji programa zaradi tega niso ogroženi.
Done at Brussels, 28 February 2011.
V Bruslju, 28. februarja 2011
PROGRAMME AND INDICATIVE BUDGET BREAKDOWN FOR 2011
PROGRAM IN OKVIRNA RAZČLENITEV PRORAČUNA ZA LETO 2011
Measure 1.1 development of detection methods for harmful organisms based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR);
ukrep 1.1 razvoj metod za odkrivanje škodljivih organizmov na podlagi kvantitativne verižne reakcije s polimerazo (PCR);
Measure 1.2 phytosanitary research and survey of the citrus production;
ukrep 1.2 fitosanitarna raziskava in pregled pridelave agrumov;
Measure 2 phytosanitary surveys and training of nursery farmers (flower production);
ukrep 2 fitosanitarni pregledi in usposabljanje drevesničarjev (pridelava cvetja);
Measure 3.1 management of a survey network for fruit flies;
ukrep 3.1 upravljanje mreže pregledov za sadne mušice;
Measure 3.2 management of the risk of introduction of harmful organisms by tourist activity.
ukrep 3.2 obvladovanje tveganja vnosa škodljivih organizmov s turistično dejavnostjo.
Indicative budget breakdown with indication of the various expected deliverables
Okvirna razčlenitev proračuna z navedbo različnih pričakovanih rezultatov
Maximum Union financial contribution
Največji finančni prispevek unije
Inter-DOM sub-programme
Podprogram inter-dom
Research on citrus diseases (R) and survey of the citrus production phytosanitary status (S)
Raziskava bolezni agrumov (R) in pregled fitosanitarnega statusa pridelave agrumov (S)
Phytosanitary surveys and training of nursery farmers (S)
Fitosanitarni pregledi in usposabljanje drevesničarjev (s)
Management of a survey network for fruit flies (S)
Upravljanje mreže pregledov za sadne mušice (s)
Actions of communication to the public on the risks of introduction of harmful organisms (S)
Obveščanje javnosti o tveganjih vnosa škodljivih organizmov (s)
The programme submitted by the French authorities and the measures provided for concern 2011.
Program, ki so ga predložili pristojni organi Francije, in predvideni ukrepi veljajo za leto 2011.
This decision should therefore apply as from the beginning of that calendar year, allowing proper financing and execution of these measures.
Ta sklep, ki omogoča ustrezno financiranje in izvrševanje teh ukrepov, se mora zato uporabljati od začetka navedenega koledarskega leta.
on the State aid C 4/03 (ex NN 102/02) implemented by Italy for WAM SpA
C 4/03 (ex NN 102/02) o državni pomoči Italije za WAM SpA
As no reply was received, and in spite of a request from the Italian authorities by letter of 25 June 2002 for an extension of the deadline until 31 July 2002, an information order within the meaning of Article 10(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [3] (hereinafter: ‘Regulation (EC) No 659/1999’) was adopted by the Commission on 26 September 2002.
Ker italijanske oblasti, kljub temu, da so z dopisom z dne 25. junija 2002 zaprosile za podaljšanje predpisanega obdobja do 31. julija, odgovora niso predložile, je Komisija 26. septembra 2002 v skladu s členom 10(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba (ES) št. 659/1999) sprejela odredbo o predložitvi podatkov.
Meanwhile, the case was transferred into the non-notified aid register and was given the number NN 102/2002.
Med tem je bila zadeva vpisana v register nepriglašene pomoči pred številko NN 102/2002.
Having not yet received the above-mentioned letter, the complainant sent the Commission a reminder by letter of 10 February 2003.
Ker v tem času še ni prejel zgoraj navedenega dopisa, je pritožnik z dopisom z dne 10. februarja 2003 Komisiji poslal opomin.
By letter of 27 February 2003, Italy asked for an extension, until 7 March 2003, of the 15-day deadline for presentation of observations on confidentiality, as laid down in the Commission’s decision.
Italija je z dopisom z dne 27. februarja 2003 zaprosila za podaljšanje 15-dnevnega roka za predložitev pripomb v zvezi z zaupnostjo, kakor je določeno v sklepu Komisije, in sicer do 7. marca 2003.
By letter of 10 July 2003, the Commission replied to the two above-mentioned letters from Morton Machine Company.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. julija 2003 odgovorila na oba zgoraj navedena dopisa podjetja Morton Machines Company.
On 19 May 2004 the Commission adopted a decision under Article 7(3) and 7(5) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 [5].
Dne 19. maja 2004 je Komisija sprejela sklep po členu 7(3) in 7(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 [5].
The Italian authorities confirmed the granting of aid in the form of subsidised loans amounting to LIT 2281450000 (approx. EUR 1,18 million) to WAM SpA in 1995 for projects in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
Italijanske oblasti so potrdile dodelitev pomoči v obliki subvencioniranih posojil v višini 2281450000 ITL (približno 1,8 milijona EUR) podjetju WAM SpA leta 1995 za projekte na Japonskem, v Južni Koreji in na Tajvanu.
According to the Italian authorities, the beneficiary was actually granted a subsidised loan of LIT 1358505421 (approx. EUR 0,7 million) as the planned projects in Korea and Taiwan were not implemented due to the economic crisis in those countries.
Vendar pa je bil upravičencu po navedbah italijanskih oblasti dejansko dodeljen znesek v višini 1358505421 ITL (približno 0,7 milijona EUR), saj načrtovani projekti v Koreji in na Tajvanu zaradi gospodarske krize v teh državah niso bili izvedeni.
The loan was to be repaid in 5 years, on a straight-line basis and in equal half yearly amounts, with interest payable on the outstanding balance.
Posojilo je moralo biti odplačano v petih letih, časovno enakomerno, v enakih polletnih obrokih, pri tem pa so se obresti zaračunavale na preostanek dolga.
A grace period of 2 years was envisaged.
Predviden je bil dvoletni podaljšan plačilni rok.
In the light of the above and on the basis of the information available at the time of the opening of the procedure, the aid intensity seemed to be equivalent to 16,38 % gross grant equivalent (gge) which would have resulted in aid of LIT 222,523 million (approx. EUR 115000).
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in na podlagi informacij, ki so bile na voljo ob začetku postopka, se je štelo, da je intenzivnost pomoči znašala 16,38 % bruto ekvivalenta dotacije, kar bi pomenilo domnevno pomoč v višini 222,523 milijona ITL (približno 115000 EUR).
The following costs, expressed in LIT million, were taken into account:
Priznani stroški, izraženi v milijonih ITL, so naslednji:
(in LIT million)
(v milijonih ITL)