natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
renovation and change of use of existing buildings owned by public authorities or non-profit operators for use as housing designated for low-income households or people with special needs.
prenova in sprememba rabe obstoječih zgradb, katerih lastniki so javni organi ali neprofitni subjekti in so namenjene za uporabo kot stanovanjski objekti za gospodinjstva z nizkim prihodkom ali ljudi s posebnimi potrebami.
For the purposes of point (b) of paragraph 2, interventions may include the renovation or replacement of existing housing.
Za namene točke (b) odstavka 2 posegi lahko vključujejo prenovo ali nadomestitev obstoječih stanovanjskih objektov.
The Commission shall adopt the list of criteria needed for determining the areas referred to under point (a) of paragraph 2 and the list of eligible interventions in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 103(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.’
Komisija sprejme seznam meril, potrebnih za določanje območij iz točke (a) odstavka 2 in seznam upravičenih posegov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 103(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.“
Opinion of 5 November 2009 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 5. novembra 2009 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Position of the European Parliament of 10 February 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 26 April 2010.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. februarja 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 26. aprila 2010.
Regulation (EU) No 438/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 438/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 o zahtevah v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki se uporabljajo za netrgovske premike hišnih živali
Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] lays down the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and the rules applying to checks on such movement.
Uredba (ES) št. 998/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] določa zahteve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki se uporabljajo za netrgovske premike hišnih živali, in pravila, ki se uporabljajo za nadzor teh premikov.
Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 lays down provisions applicable to the movement between Member States of dogs, cats and ferrets as listed in Parts A and B of Annex I thereto.
Člen 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 vsebuje določbe, ki se uporabljajo med državami članicami za premike psov, mačk in belih dihurjev iz delov A in B Priloge I k Uredbi.
Pursuant to Article 5(1)(a) of that Regulation, those pet animals must be identified by means of an electronic identification system (transponder).
V skladu s členom 5(1)(a) navedene uredbe je treba te živali identificirati z elektronskim identifikacijskim sistemom (transponderjem).
For an eight-year transitional period from the date of entry into force of that Regulation, those pet animals are to be regarded as identified also where they bear a clearly readable tattoo.
Med osemletnim prehodnim obdobjem, ki se začne z datumom veljavnosti navedene uredbe, se za navedene vrste hišnih živali šteje, da so identificirane, če imajo jasno čitljivo tetovirano znamenje.
Article 4(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provide that, where the transponder does not comply with ISO Standard 11784 or with Annex A to ISO Standard 11785, the owner or the natural person responsible for the pet animal on behalf of the owner must provide the means necessary for reading the transponder at the time of any inspection.
Člen 4(1) in člen 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določata, da mora lastnik ali fizična oseba, ki je v imenu lastnika odgovorna za hišno žival med premikom, priskrbeti potrebno sredstvo za branje transponderja ob vsakem pregledu, kadar transponder ne ustreza standardu ISO 11784 ali Prilogi A k standardu ISO 11785.
In order to avoid any unnecessary disturbances, in particular as regards the movement of pet animals from third countries, it is necessary to make the references to those ISO Standards more precise before the use of transponders becomes mandatory.
Da bi se izognili nepotrebnim motnjam, zlasti v zvezi s premiki hišnih živali iz tretjih držav, je treba sklicevanja na navedene standarde ISO določiti natančneje, preden uporaba transponderjev postane obvezna.
Due to the technical nature of those references, it is appropriate to include them in an Annex to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 and amend Articles 4 and 14 of that Regulation accordingly.
Navedena sklicevanja je zaradi njihove tehnične narave primerno vključiti v Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003 ter ustrezno spremeniti člena 4 in 14 navedene uredbe.
In addition, Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provides that dogs, cats and ferrets must be accompanied by a passport issued by a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority, certifying valid anti-rabies vaccination, in accordance with the recommendations of the manufacturing laboratory, carried out on the animal in question, with an inactivated anti-rabies vaccine of at least one antigenic unit per dose (WHO standard).
Poleg tega člen 5(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določa, da morajo biti psi, mačke in beli dihurji opremljeni s potnim listom, ki ga izda veterinar, pooblaščen od pristojnega organa, ki dokazuje, da je bila zadevna žival veljavno cepljena proti steklini v skladu s priporočili proizvodnega laboratorija z inaktiviranim cepivom proti steklini z najmanj eno antigensko enoto na odmerek (standard WHO).
Since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003, recombinant vaccines have also become available for the purposes of anti-rabies vaccination.
Od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 so za cepljenje proti steklini na voljo tudi rekombinantna cepiva.
In order to allow the movement, in particular from third countries, of dogs, cats and ferrets vaccinated with recombinant vaccines, provision should also be made to authorise, for the purpose of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003, the use of such vaccines in accordance with certain technical requirements laid down in an Annex to that Regulation.
Da se omogočijo premiki psov, mačk in belih dihurjev, cepljenih z rekombinantnimi cepivi, zlasti iz tretjih držav, bi bilo treba sprejeti tudi določbo, ki za namene Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 dovoli uporabo takšnih cepiv v skladu z določenimi tehničnimi zahtevami iz Priloge k navedeni uredbi.
If administered in a Member State, the vaccines should have been granted a marketing authorisation in accordance with either Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products [4] or Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency [5].
Cepiva za uporabo v državi članici bi morala imeti dovoljenje za promet, izdano v skladu z Direktivo 2001/82/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini [4] ali Uredbo (ES) št. 726/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o postopkih Skupnosti za pridobitev dovoljenja za promet in nadzor zdravil za humano in veterinarsko uporabo ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za zdravila [5].
If administered in a third country, the vaccines should comply with the minimum standards for safety as laid down in the relevant Chapter of the Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals of the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE).
Cepiva za uporabo v tretji državi bi morala biti v skladu z minimalnimi standardi za varnost, kakor so določeni v ustreznem poglavju Priročnika diagnostičnih testov in cepiv za kopenske živali Svetovne organizacije za zdravje živali (OIE).
In addition, science-based rules of a similar kind to those laid down for rabies should be adopted.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba sprejeti znanstveno utemeljena pravila, ki so podobna pravilom za steklino.
They should provide for preventive health measures for the movement of pet animals regarding other diseases that may affect those animals, where those preventive measures are proportionate to the risk of spreading those diseases due to such movement.
Ta pravila bi morala določati preventivne zdravstvene ukrepe za premike hišnih živali glede drugih morebitnih bolezni navedenih živali, kadar so navedeni preventivni ukrepi sorazmerni s tveganjem za širjenje navedenih bolezni zaradi takšnih premikov.
Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provides that the entry of dogs and cats into Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom is to be subject to additional requirements, in view of the particular situation in those Member States with regard to rabies.
Člen 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določa, da za vstop psov in mačk na ozemlje Irske, Malte, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva veljajo dodatne zahteve glede na posebne razmere v navedenih državah članicah v zvezi s steklino.
That provision is to be applied as a transitional measure until 30 June 2010.
Navedena določba se kot prehodni ukrep uporablja do 30. junija 2010.
In accordance with those additional requirements, dogs and cats entering the territory of those Member States must be identified by means of a transponder unless the Member State of destination also recognises that the animal may be identified by means of a clearly readable tattoo.
V skladu z navedenimi dodatnimi zahtevami morajo biti psi in mačke, ki vstopijo na ozemlje navedenih držav članic, identificirani s transponderjem, razen če namembna država članica tudi priznava, da je žival lahko identificirana z jasno čitljivim tetoviranim znamenjem.
In addition, those requirements include mandatory antibody titration before entry of those pet animals into the territory of those Member States, to confirm a protective level of anti-rabies antibodies.
Poleg tega navedene zahteve vključujejo obvezno titracijo protiteles pred vstopom teh hišnih živali na ozemlje navedenih držav članic, da se potrdi zaščitna raven protiteles za steklino.
The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of preventive health measures regarding diseases other than rabies, and modifications of technical requirements for the identification of animals and for the anti-rabies vaccination as laid down in the Annexes inserted, in accordance with this Regulation, into Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
Komisijo bi bilo treba pooblastiti, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme delegirane akte v zvezi s preventivnimi zdravstvenimi ukrepi pri boleznih, razen stekline, in za spremembe tehničnih zahtev za identifikacijo živali in cepljenje proti steklini, kot je določeno v prilogah, vstavljenih v skladu s to uredbo v Uredbo (ES) št. 998/2003.
Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 lays down the conditions for the movement of dogs, cats and ferrets from third countries depending on the prevailing rabies situation in the third country of origin and in the Member State of destination.
Člen 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določa pogoje za premike psov, mačk in belih dihurjev iz tretjih držav glede na prevladujoče razmere v zvezi s steklino v tretji državi izvora in v namembni državi članici.
Article 8(1)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provides that, in cases where pet animals are moved from certain third countries to Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom, the additional requirements provided for in Article 6 of that Regulation are to apply.
Člen 8(1)(a)(ii) Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določa, da se morajo v primerih, ko se hišne živali premikajo iz določenih tretjih držav na ozemlje Irske, Malte, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva, uporabljati dodatne zahteve iz člena 6 navedene uredbe.
Those third countries are listed in Section 2 of Part B and in Part C of Annex II to that Regulation.
Te tretje države so navedene v delu B oddelka 2 in v delu C Priloge II k navedeni uredbi.
Article 8(1)(b)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provides that, in cases where pet animals are moved from other third countries, they are to be placed in quarantine unless they have been brought into conformity with the requirements of Article 6 of that Regulation after their entry into the Union.
Člen 8(1)(b)(ii) Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določa, da je treba hišne živali v primerih, ko se premikajo iz drugih tretjih držav, dati v karanteno, razen če se po vstopu v Unijo ne uskladijo z zahtevami iz člena 6 navedene uredbe.
In addition, Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provides that Finland, Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom as regards echinococcosis, and Ireland, Malta and the United Kingdom as regards ticks, may make the entry of pet animals into their territory subject to compliance with the special rules applicable on the date of entry into force of that Regulation.
Poleg tega člen 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določa, da lahko Finska, Irska, Malta, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo, kar zadeva ehinokokozo, ter Irska, Malta in Združeno kraljestvo, kar zadeva klope, zahtevajo za vstop hišnih živali na svoje ozemlje izpolnjevanje posebnih pravil, ki se uporabljajo na datum začetka veljavnosti navedene uredbe.
Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 provides that the Commission, after receipt of the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on the need to maintain the serological test, and based on experience gained and on a risk evaluation, is to submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report, together with appropriate proposals for determining the regime to be applied with effect from 1 July 2010 for Articles 6, 8 and 16 of that Regulation.
Člen 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 določa, da mora Komisija po prejemu mnenja Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) o potrebi ohranitve serološkega testa predložiti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj in ocene tveganja, skupaj z ustreznimi predlogi za določitev režima, ki se od 1. julija 2010 uporablja za člene 6, 8 in 16 navedene uredbe.
In order to determine that regime, the Commission carried out an impact assessment based on various recent consultations and on the Commission report that was adopted on 8 October 2007 in connection with Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 and took into account the recommendations made by EFSA.
Za določitev tega režima je Komisija izvedla oceno učinka na podlagi nedavnih različnih posvetovanj in poročila Komisije, sprejetega 8. oktobra 2007 v povezavi s členom 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003, in pri tem upoštevala priporočila EFSA.
On 11 December 2006, EFSA adopted an opinion entitled ‘Assessment of the risk of rabies introduction into the UK, Ireland, Sweden, Malta, as a consequence of abandoning the serological test measuring protective antibodies to rabies’ [6].
EFSA je 11. decembra 2006 sprejela mnenje z naslovom „Ocena tveganja za vnos stekline na ozemlje Združenega kraljestva, Irske, Švedske in Malte kot posledica odprave seroloških testov za merjenje zaščitnih protiteles proti steklini“ [6].
Based on 2005 data, EFSA identified that certain Member States have a non-negligible prevalence of rabies in pet animals.
Na podlagi podatkov iz leta 2005 je EFSA ugotovila, da v določenih državah članicah razširjenost stekline pri hišnih živalih ni zanemarljiva.
In addition, EFSA recommended that risk-mitigating measures be implemented with respect to the movement of pet animals from countries with non-negligible prevalence of rabies in pet animals.
Poleg tega je EFSA priporočila izvajanje ukrepov za ublažitev tveganja v zvezi s premiki hišnih živali iz držav, v katerih razširjenost stekline pri hišnih živalih ni zanemarljiva.
Rabies in those Member States is primarily of sylvatic nature.
V navedenih državah članicah se steklina pojavlja zlasti v silvatični obliki.
Field evidence demonstrated that with the elimination of sylvatic rabies as a result of intensive programmes of oral vaccination of wildlife, the disease occurrence in domestic animals diminishes.
Dejanski dokazi so pokazali, da se z odpravo silvatične stekline kot posledica intenzivnih programov za oralno cepljenje prosto živečih živali, pojavnost bolezni pri domačih živali zmanjša.
The Community has approved a number of programmes for the eradication, control and monitoring of rabies in those Member States, pursuant to Article 24(5) of Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field [7].
Skupnost je odobrila številne programe za izkoreninjenje, nadzor in spremljanje stekline v navedenih državah članicah v skladu s členom 24(5) Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o odhodkih na področju veterine [7].
The Commission envisages ending EU support to national programmes in the territory of those Member States by the end of 2011.
Komisija namerava podporo EU za nacionalne programe na ozemlju navedenih držav članic zaključiti do konca leta 2011.
In view of the EFSA opinion of 11 December 2006 and of the Community-supported programmes for the eradication of rabies in certain Member States, the transitional measure provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 should be extended until 31 December 2011.
Glede na mnenje EFSA z dne 11. decembra 2006 in programe Skupnosti za izkoreninjenje stekline v nekaterih državah članicah bi bilo treba prehodni ukrep iz člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 podaljšati do 31. decembra 2011.
On 18 January 2007, EFSA adopted an opinion entitled ‘Assessment of the risk of echinococcosis introduction into the UK, Ireland, Sweden, Malta and Finland as a consequence of abandoning the national rules’ [8].
EFSA je 18. januarja 2007 sprejela mnenje z naslovom „Ocena tveganja za vnos ehinokokoze na ozemlje Združenega kraljestva, Irske, Švedske in Malte kot posledica odprave nacionalnih pravil“ [8].
On 8 March 2007, EFSA adopted an opinion entitled ‘Assessment of the risk of tick introduction into the UK, Ireland and Malta as a consequence of abandoning the national rules’ [9].
EFSA je 8. marca 2007 sprejela mnenje z naslovom „Ocena tveganja za vnos klopov na ozemlje Združenega kraljestva, Irske in Malte kot posledica odprave nacionalnih pravil“ [9].
Those opinions show that the data available did not allow EFSA to demonstrate a particular status of the Member States applying the transitional measures with regard to certain ticks and the tapeworm Echinococcus multilocularis and to quantify the risk of pathogen introduction through the non-commercial movement of pet animals.
Navedeni mnenji kažeta, da na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov EFSA ni mogla utemeljiti posebnega statusa držav članic, ki uporabljajo prehodne ukrepe v zvezi z nekaterimi klopi in trakuljo Echinococcus multilocularis, ter količinsko opredeliti tveganja za vnos patogenov z netrgovskimi premiki hišnih živali.
In order to ensure consistency as regards the transitional measures, it is appropriate to extend the transitional measure provided for in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 until 31 December 2011.
Za zagotovitev doslednosti v zvezi s prehodnimi ukrepi je primerno podaljšati prehodni ukrep iz člena 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 do 31. decembra 2011.
‘In the case referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph, where the transponder does not comply with the requirements set out in Annex Ia, the owner or the natural person responsible for the pet animal on behalf of the owner must provide the means necessary for reading the transponder at the time of any inspection.’;
„V primeru iz točke (b) prvega pododstavka mora lastnik ali fizična oseba, ki je v imenu lastnika odgovorna za hišno žival, priskrbeti potrebna sredstva za branje transponderja ob vsakem pregledu, če transponder ne ustreza zahtevam iz Priloge Ia.“.
Article 5(1) is amended as follows:
Člen 5(1) se spremeni:
be accompanied by a passport issued by a veterinarian authorised by the competent authority certifying that:
opremiti s potnim listom, ki ga izda veterinar, pooblaščen od pristojnega organa, ki dokazuje, da:
a valid anti-rabies vaccination was carried out on the animal in question pursuant to Annex Ib,
je bila zadevna žival veljavno cepljena proti steklini v skladu s Prilogo Ib;
where necessary, preventive health measures regarding other diseases were carried out on the animal in question.’;
so bili za zadevno žival po potrebi izvedeni preventivni zdravstveni ukrepi v zvezi z drugimi boleznimi.“.
‘In order to ensure the control of diseases other than rabies, likely to spread due to the movement of pet animals, the Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 19b and subject to the conditions of Articles 19c and 19d, the preventive health measures referred to in point (b)(ii) of the first subparagraph.
„Komisija lahko z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členom 19b in ob upoštevanju pogojev iz členov 19c in 19d sprejme preventivne zdravstvene ukrepe iz točke (b)(ii) prvega pododstavka, da zagotovi nadzor nad boleznimi, razen stekline, ki bi se lahko razširile zaradi premika hišnih živali.
Those measures shall be scientifically justified and shall be proportionate to the risk of spreading those diseases due to such movement.’;
Navedeni ukrepi so znanstveno utemeljeni in sorazmerni s tveganjem za širjenje navedenih bolezni zaradi takšnega premika.“.
In the first subparagraph of Article 6(1), the introductory part and the first indent is replaced by the following:
V prvem pododstavku člena 6(1) se uvodni del in prva alinea nadomestita z naslednjim:
Until 31 December 2011, the entry of the pet animals listed in Part A of Annex I into the territory of Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom shall be subject to the following requirements:
Do 31. decembra 2011 veljajo za vstop hišnih živali iz dela A Priloge I na ozemlje Irske, Malte, Švedske in Združenega kraljestva naslednje zahteve:
they must be identified in accordance with point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 4(1), unless, until the end of the eight-year transitional period provided for in Article 4(1), the Member State of destination also recognises identification in accordance with point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 4(1), and’;
identificirane morajo biti v skladu s točko (b) prvega pododstavka člena 4(1), razen če namembna država članica do konca osemletnega prehodnega obdobja iz člena 4(1) prizna tudi identifikacijo v skladu s točko (a) prvega pododstavka člena 4(1), in“.
Article 8(1) is amended as follows:
Člen 8(1) se spremeni:
In point (a), point (ii) is replaced by the following:
V točki (a) se točka (ii) nadomesti z naslednjim:
until 31 December 2011, one of the Member States listed in part A of Annex II, either directly or after transit through one of the territories listed in part B of Annex II, satisfy the requirements of Article 6.’
v eno od držav članic iz dela A Priloge II, neposredno ali po tranzitu skozi eno od ozemelj iz dela B Priloge II, do 31. decembra 2011 izpolnjevati zahteve iz člena 6.“.
In point (b), point (ii) is replaced by the following:
V točki (b) se točka (ii) nadomesti z naslednjim:
until 31 December 2011, one of the Member States listed in part A of Annex II, either directly or after transit through one of the territories listed in part B of Annex II, be placed in quarantine unless they have been brought into conformity with the requirements of Article 6 after their entry into the Union.’;
v eno od držav članic iz dela A Priloge II, neposredno ali po tranzitu skozi eno od ozemelj iz dela B Priloge II, do 31. decembra 2011 namestiti v karanteno, razen če se po vstopu v Unijo uskladijo z zahtevami iz člena 6.“.
In Article 14, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 14 se drugi odstavek nadomesti z naslednjim: