natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, no new argument was presented which would lead to a change in the conclusions in this regard.
Vendar ni bila predložena nobena nova trditev, na podlagi katere bi se spremenile sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi s tem.
In particular, it is recalled that invoices were issued by the related company to customers in the Union and that payments were received by the related company from customers in the Union.
Zlasti je treba spomniti, da je povezana družba izdala račune strankam v Uniji in prejela plačila strank iz Unije.
Also, the financial accounts of the related company showed that it bore normal SG&A costs incurred between importation and resale.
Poleg tega so finančni računi povezane družbe pokazali, da je imela med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo običajne PSA-stroške.
Therefore, the related company indeed performs the typical functions of an importer.
Povezana družba torej dejansko opravlja značilne funkcije uvoznika.
Finally, it should be noted that the producer in Malaysia also performed direct sales to independent clients in the Union and other countries.
Nenazadnje je treba opozoriti, da je proizvajalec v Maleziji prav tako neposredno prodajal neodvisnim strankam v Uniji in drugih državah.
On the latter issue, the company referred to the Interpipe judgement with arguments similar to those raised by the Indonesian exporting producers.
V zvezi s tem se je družba sklicevala na sodbo v zadevi Interpipe, v kateri so bile navedene trditve, podobne trditvam indonezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
For the reasons already explained in recital 33 of this Regulation, the circumstances of this case are different from the circumstances discussed in the Interpipe judgement.
Iz razlogov, ki so bili že pojasnjeni v uvodni izjavi 33, so okoliščine tega primera drugačne od okoliščin v primeru sodbe Interpipe.
Furthermore, the claim of the Malaysian exporter that the company’s independent sales were negotiated by its related importer in the Union acting in the capacity of the export sales department of the Malaysian company contradicts the explanations provided during the verification visit where the key role played by the mother company in Japan was instead underlined in this context.
Trditev malezijskega izvoznika, da se je glede neodvisne prodaje družbe dogovoril njeni povezani uvoznik v EU, ki nastopa v vlogi izvoznega oddelka malezijske družbe, je v nasprotju z obrazložitvami, predloženimi med preveritvenim obiskom, ko je bila v zvezi s tem izpostavljena ključna vloga matične družbe na Japonskem.
The above findings lead to the conclusion that the adjustment for SG&A and profit should be maintained and no similar adjustment for the calculation of normal value is justified.
Navedene ugotovitve so privedle do sklepa, da je treba prilagoditev za PSA-stroške in dobičke ohraniti in da za izračun normalne vrednosti ni utemeljena nobena podobna prilagoditev.
The same company also claimed that the deduction of certain selling expenses of its related importer had been made twice in reconstructing the export price.
Ista družba je tudi trdila, da so se pri ponovni računski določitvi izvozne cene dvakrat odšteli nekateri prodajni stroški njenega povezanega uvoznika.
The calculations were checked and, since the claim was found to be justified, were adjusted accordingly.
Izračuni so se preverili in se po ugotovitvi, da je bila trditev utemeljena, ustrezno prilagodili.
One of the Malaysian exporters claimed that the comparison between normal value and export price should not be based on product types as identified by product control numbers (PCN) but on the basis of the companies’ own product codes.
Eden od malezijskih izvoznikov je trdil, da primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene ne sme temeljiti na vrstah izdelka, kot so določene s kontrolnimi številkami izdelkov, ampak na lastnih oznakah izdelkov družb.
According to this company, the PCNs used in the investigation would not capture in sufficient detail the specificities of the production process and differences in the costs and prices.
Glede na trditve te družbe kontrolne številke izdelkov, uporabljene v preiskavi, ne zajemajo dovolj podrobno posebnosti proizvodnega postopka ter razlik v stroških in cenah.
In support of this claim the company referred to some of its products which were manufactured by using different production processes and different basic raw materials, which resulted in higher unit costs of production.
Da bi podprla to trditev, se je družba sklicevala na nekatere svoje izdelke, ki so bili proizvedeni z različnimi proizvodnimi postopki in z uporabo različnih osnovnih surovin, zaradi česar so bili proizvodni stroški na enoto višji.
It should be noted that this claim was neither raised at the provisional stage of the investigation nor during the on-the-spot verification visit.
Opozoriti je treba, da ta trditev ni bila predložena niti v začasni fazi preiskave niti med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem.
Furthermore, the use of the company’s own product codes in the calculation would not solve the problem of different production methods since the same company’s production codes were also used for products manufactured under different production processes.
Poleg tega se z uporabo družbinih lastnih oznak izdelkov v izračunu ne bi rešila težava različnih proizvodnih metod, ker so se enake oznake uporabljale tudi za izdelke, proizvedene z različnimi proizvodnimi postopki.
In the absence of any comments concerning the comparison, the provisional findings in recitals 55 to 58 of the provisional Regulation, but for the amendment as explained in recital 49 of this Regulation, are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 55 do 58 začasne uredbe, vendar spremenjene, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 49, potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, a Malaysian producer which did not export to the Union commented on recital 60 of the provisional Regulation claiming that there are other producers of the product concerned in Malaysia.
Po začasnem razkritju je malezijski proizvajalec, ki ni izvažal v EU, predložil pripombe v zvezi z uvodno izjavo 60 začasne uredbe, pri čemer je trdil, da so v Maleziji še drugi proizvajalci zadevnega izdelka.
In this regard it is noted that the presence of an additional producer in Malaysia, which is not an exporter to the Union, does not change the finding with regard to the level of cooperation in Malaysia as no evidence was presented that the investigated companies did not account for all the exports of the product concerned to the Union in the IP.
V zvezi s tem je treba navesti, da prisotnost dodatnega proizvajalca v Maleziji, ki ni izvoznik v EU, ne spremeni ugotovitve glede stopnje sodelovanja v Maleziji, ker ni bilo dokazov, da preiskane družbe v OP niso predstavljale vsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v EU.
Furthermore, the same Malaysian producer criticised the fact that producers, like him, which did not export to the Union in the IP would be subject to the residual duty rate.
Isti malezijski proizvajalec je kritiziral dejstvo, da bi se za proizvajalce, kot je on sam, ki v OP niso izvažali v Unijo, uporabljala stopnja preostale dajatve.
In this regard it has to be noted that companies which have not exported to the Union during the IP cannot have an individual duty rate.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da za družbe, ki v OP niso izvažale v EU, ne morejo veljati posamezne stopnje dajatve.
However, as soon as these companies start to export, or enter into an irrevocable obligation to sell to the Union, they may apply for a newcomer review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation which may result in an individual duty margin, if the conditions set up in that Article are fulfilled.
Vendar lahko te družbe, takoj ko začnejo izvažati ali prevzamejo nepreklicno obveznost prodaje v EU, zaprosijo za pregled novega izvoznika v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe, kar lahko privede do posamezne stopnje dajatve, če so pogoji iz navedenega člena izpolnjeni.
One of the Malaysian producers claimed that the cif value used as a basis for calculating the dumping margin percentage should not be based on the price declared to the customs, but should be calculated back from the resale price, netted of all the post importation costs in the Union.
Eden od malezijskih proizvajalcev je trdil, da vrednost CIF, ki se uporablja kot osnova za izračun odstotka stopnje dampinga, ne sme temeljiti na ceni, prijavljeni pri carinskih organih, ampak jo je treba izračunati na podlagi cene pri nadaljnji prodaji, pri čemer se odštejejo vsi stroški po uvozu v Unijo.
However, since the cif price was used as the basis of the custom value declarations at Union frontier, and does not appear to have been incorrectly declared, this same price is to be used as the basis for the dumping margin percentage calculation.
Ker pa se je cena CIF uporabila kot osnova deklaracij o carinski vrednosti na mejah Unije in se ne zdi, da je bila nepravilno prijavljena, je treba to isto ceno uporabiti kot osnovo pri izračunu odstotka stopnje dampinga.
The company claimed that a time gap exists between related deliveries from Malaysia and custom clearance for the purpose of resales in the Union.
Družba je trdila, da obstaja časovni zamik med povezanimi dobavami iz Malezije in postopki carinjenja za ponovno prodajo v Uniji.
However, even if the invoices for custom clearance are issued at a later stage, with prices following the FIFO stock valuation method, it is still the transfer price and not the resale price which is the basis for the calculation of the custom value.
Čeprav se računi za postopke carinjenja izdajo kasneje, s cenami, določenimi z metodo zaporednega vrednotenja zalog FIFO, gre še vedno za transferno ceno in ne ceno za nadaljnjo prodajo, na kateri temelji izračun carinske vrednosti.
Therefore the claim is rejected.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the dumping margin calculation, the content of recitals 59 and 60 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z izračunom stopnje dampinga ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 59 in 60 začasne uredbe potrdi.
After the publication of the provisional Regulation, it was found that minor corrections had to be made to the consumption figures due to a clerical error.
Po objavi začasne uredbe je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zaradi stvarnih napak potrebni manjši popravki podatkov glede potrošnje.
This led to minor changes in sales volume, market share of the Union industry and the market share of the countries concerned.
Na podlagi tega so se nekoliko spremenili obseg prodaje, tržni delež industrije Unije in tržni delež zadevnih držav.
These corrections however, have no significant impact on the trends and the conclusions reached with regard to consumption, sales volume, market share of the Union industry and market share of the countries concerned during the period considered in the Union market.
Vendar ti popravki nimajo velikega vpliva na trende in sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi s potrošnjo, obsegom prodaje, tržnim deležem industrije Unije in tržnim deležem zadevnih držav v obravnavanem obdobju na trgu Unije.
As mentioned in recital 62 of the provisional Regulation, it was found that the like product was manufactured by the two complainants and by small producers in the Union.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 62 začasne uredbe, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so podobni izdelek proizvajali dva pritožnika in majhni proizvajalci v Uniji.
As mentioned in recitals 11 and 12 of this Regulation, producers producing FOH containing branched isomers were excluded from the definition of the Union production of FOH.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 11 in 12, so bili proizvajalci, ki proizvajajo maščobne alkohole, sestavljene iz razvejenih izomerov, in njihove mešanice, izključeni iz opredelitve proizvodnje maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic v Uniji.
Despite the fact explained in recital 58 of this Regulation, the Union industry as defined in recitals 62 and 63 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Kljub dejstvu, pojasnjenem v uvodni izjavi 58, se potrdi opredelitev industrije Unije iz uvodnih izjav 62 in 63 začasne uredbe.
One of the two complainants was taken over by a company which is participating in the current proceeding as a user.
Enega od dveh pritožnikov je prevzela družba, ki v trenutnem postopku sodeluje kot uporabnik.
This complainant took a neutral position after the publication of the provisional Regulation.
Po objavi začasne uredbe je ta pritožnik zavzel nevtralno stališče.
Hence, some parties questioned the level of support or standing for the investigation claiming that support for the investigation must hold during the entire investigation.
Zato so nekatere strani podvomile v raven podpore ali pravno podlago preiskave, pri čemer so trdile, da se mora podpora ohraniti ves čas preiskave.
Analysis of this claim showed that the remaining complainant represents over 40 % of the total Union production, thus more than 25 % of total Union production and 100 % of the Union producers of FOH expressing their support for or opposition to the complaint.
Analiza te trditve je pokazala, da preostali pritožnik predstavlja več kot 40 % celotne proizvodnje Unije, torej več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje Unije in 100 % proizvajalcev maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic v Uniji, ki izražajo podporo pritožbi ali ji nasprotujejo.
Hence, the 25 % and the 50 % thresholds required by Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation are fully met and standing can be confirmed.
25-odstotni prag in 50-odstotni prag, kot se zahtevata v skladu s členom 5(4) osnovne uredbe, sta torej v celoti izpolnjena in pravna podlaga se lahko potrdi.
Some parties claimed that, since both complainants had imported the product concerned during the IP, they should not be considered part of the Union industry.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da se pritožnika ne smeta obravnavati kot del industrije Unije, ker sta v OP oba uvažala zadevni izdelek.
It was however verified that the percentage of product imported by these companies from the countries concerned was not substantial in comparison with their production of the like product.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil odstotek uvoza izdelka teh družb iz zadevnih držav nebistven v primerjavi z njuno proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka.
It can therefore be confirmed that the core activity of these companies is production and sales of the like product.
Zato se lahko potrdi, da je glavna dejavnost teh družb proizvodnja in prodaja podobnega izdelka.
Therefore recitals 62 to 63 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Uvodni izjavi 62 in 63 začasne uredbe se torej potrdita.
In the absence of comments concerning the Union consumption, recitals 64 to 66 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s potrošnjo Unije ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 64 do 66 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Imports into the Union from the countries concerned and price undercutting
Uvoz iz zadevnih držav v Unijo in nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen
A number of parties argued against the fact that a cumulative assessment was made for the three countries concerned in the provisional Regulation.
Številne strani so nasprotovale dejstvu, da je bila za tri zadevne države iz začasne uredbe opravljena kumulativna ocena.
In their opinion the conditions for cumulation laid down in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation were not met.
Po njihovem mnenju pogoji za kumulacijo, določeni v členu 3(4) osnovne uredbe, niso bili izpolnjeni.
Specifically, they argued that the negative undercutting found for one of the countries precluded cumulation.
Trdili so še posebej, da je negativno nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen, ugotovljeno za eno od držav, onemogočalo kumulacijo.
In addition, they submitted that the trends in sales volumes for the three exporting countries differed during the period considered, that access to raw materials and the raw materials used in the three exporting countries were also different.
Poleg tega so navedle, da so se trendi obsega prodaje iz teh treh držav izvoznic v obravnavanem obdobju razlikovali, pri čemer so bile razlike tudi pri dostopu do surovin in v surovinah, uporabljenih v teh treh državah izvoznicah.
Finally, it was mentioned that export sales from one of the countries concerned were channelled through related companies.
Nenazadnje je bilo navedeno, da je izvoz iz ene od zadevnih držav potekal prek povezanih družb.
In their view, different conditions of competition existed between the countries concerned in the Union market.
Po njihovem mnenju so med zadevnimi državami na trgu Unije obstajali različni konkurenčni pogoji.
Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation says that where imports of a product from more than one country are simultaneously subject to anti-dumping investigations, the effects of such imports shall be cumulatively assessed only if it is determined that: (a) the margin of dumping established in relation to the imports from each country is more than de minimis as defined in Article 9(3) of that Regulation and that the volume of imports from each country is not negligible; and (b) a cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports is appropriate in light of the conditions of competition between imported products and the conditions of competition between the imported products and the like Union product.
Kot določa člen 3(4) osnovne uredbe, če je uvoz izdelka iz več držav istočasno predmet protidampinških preiskav, se učinki takšnega uvoza ocenjujejo kumulativno samo, če se ugotovi, da: (a) je stopnja dampinga, ugotovljena za uvoz iz vsake od teh držav, večja kot de minimis, kot ga opredeljuje člen 9(3), in da obseg uvoza iz vsake od teh držav ni zanemarljiv ter (b) je kumulativna ocena učinkov uvoza ustrezna glede na konkurenčne pogoje med uvoženimi izdelki ter konkurenčne pogoje med uvoženimi izdelki in podobnega izdelka Unije.
As explained in paragraph 4.3.2 of the provisional Regulation, the volume of dumped imports for each country concerned was not negligible, and the presence of dumped imports remained significant during the period considered.
Kot je pojasnjeno v odstavku 4.3.2 začasne uredbe, obseg dampinškega uvoza posamezne zadevne države ni bil zanemarljiv, pri čemer so količine takšnega uvoza v obravnavanem obdobju ostale velike.
It was found that the conditions of competition and the pricing of the countries concerned were similar between the imported products and the like product, in particular during the IP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bili konkurenčni pogoji in oblikovanje cen uvoženih izdelkov in podobnega izdelka v zadevnih državah podobni, zlasti v OP.
As explained in recital 127 of the provisional Regulation, the injury elimination levels established for the countries concerned were significantly above the de minimis threshold of 2 %.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 127 začasne uredbe, so vse opredeljene stopnje odprave škode za zadevne države bistveno presegale 2-odstotni prag de minimis.
Hence, the price undercutting is not exactly reflecting the situation which would occur in a market with effective price competition.
Zato nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen pravzaprav ne izraža razmer, ki bi se vzpostavile na trgu z učinkovito cenovno konkurenco.
Furthermore, the sales channels and the price trends for each of the countries concerned were analysed and found to be similar as shown in the table below.
Prodajne poti in cenovni trendi za posamezno zadevno državo so se analizirali, pri čemer so bili rezultati podobni, kot je prikazano v preglednici spodaj.
The import prices of the countries concerned followed a declining trend and were particularly low during the IP compared to the average Union industry’s prices.
Uvozne cene zadevnih držav so sledile padajočemu trendu in so bile zlasti nizke v OP v primerjavi s povprečnimi cenami industrije Unije.
Imports based on Eurostat (as adjusted to cover only the product concerned)
Uvoz glede na Eurostatove podatke (prilagojeni tako, da vključujejo samo zadevni izdelek)
Average price in EUR/tonnes Malaysia
Povprečna cena v EUR/tono v Maleziji
Annual Δ %
Letni Δ%
Average price in EUR/tonnes Indonesia
Povprečna cena v EUR/tono v Indoneziji
Average price in EUR/tonnes India
Povprečna cena v EUR/tono v Indiji
Consequently, recitals 67 to 70 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se uvodne izjave 67 do 70 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of comments concerning volume, price and market share of dumped imports from the countries concerned, recitals 71 to 73 of the provisional Regulation, are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z obsegom, ceno in tržnim deležem dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 71 do 73 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Parties claimed that there are differences in raw material prices between FOH produced from natural oils and fats and synthetic sources such as crude or mineral oil and that an additional product control number (PCN) criterion should have been introduced in order to consider the differences in cost of production arising from the different production processes.
Strani so trdile, da se cene surovin maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic, proizvedenih iz naravnega olja in maščob, ter tistih iz sintetičnih virov, kot je surovo ali mineralno olje, razlikujejo in da bi bilo treba uvesti dodatno merilo kontrolne številke izdelka, da bi se upoštevale razlike v ceni proizvodnje zaradi različnih proizvodnih postopkov.
However, PCNs are established on the basis of the individual characteristics of each sub-category of items falling within the definition of the product concerned and not on the basis of the price of each of those items.
Vendar se kontrolne številke izdelkov določijo na podlagi individualnih značilnosti posamezne podkategorije postavk, ki jih zajema opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, in ne na podlagi cene vsake od teh postavk.
Moreover, it was found that there is no substantial difference in terms of the basic characteristics of FOH produced from natural oils and fats and FOH made of crude or mineral oil, nor the cost of production difference is such as to warrant a differentiation in terms of PCN.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da se osnovne značilnosti maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic, proizvedenih iz naravnih olj in maščob, ter tistih iz surove nafte ali mineralnega olja ne razlikujejo bistveno, prav tako pa razlika v ceni proizvodnje ni taka, da bi utemeljila uporabo različnih kontrolnih številk izdelkov.
Certain parties claimed that the figure used to reflect the post-importation costs, which are around 3 % of the import price, used to establish the level of undercutting by the countries concerned was unclear and did not seem to be appropriate in this case.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je bila številka, ki je odražala stroške po uvozu, v višini približno 3 % uvozne cene in se uporabljajo pri določanju ravni nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen v zadevnih državah, nejasna in se je v tem primeru zdela neustrezna.
However, the information verified during the investigation showed that importing parties such as importers and users had to pay such amount of post importation costs in order to release the product concerned for free circulation into the Union market.
Vendar so informacije, preverjene med preiskavo, pokazale, da so morale strani, ki uvažajo, na primer uvozniki in uporabniki, plačati tak znesek stroškov po uvozu zato, da bi zadevni izdelek sprostile v prosti promet na trgu Unije.
In addition, the parties did not provide any evidence which would indicate that the post-importation costs were not correctly established in this case.
Poleg tega strani niso predložile nobenih dokazov, da stroški po uvozu v tem primeru niso bili pravilno določeni.
Hence, this claim was dismissed.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
The methodology used to calculate the price undercutting as explained in recitals 74 and 75 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Metodologija za izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, kot je pojasnjena v uvodnih izjavah 74 in 75 začasne uredbe, se potrdi.