natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Trade marks containing the term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ that were protected through registration or acquired by use prior to 20 October 2004, shall not be invalidated nor shall their continued use be hindered by virtue of the registration of ‘Karlovarské oplatky’ as a protected geographical indication, provided the general requirements under trade mark legislation are otherwise met.
Blagovne znamke, ki vsebujejo ime „Karlsbader Oblaten“ in so bile zaščitene z registracijo ali privzete prek rabe pred 20. oktobrom 2004, se ne razveljavijo, prav tako nadaljnje uporabe ne ovira registracija imena „Karlovarské oplatky“ kot zaščitene geografske označbe, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjene druge splošne zahteve zakonodaje o blagovnih znamkah.
OJ C 85, 19.4.2007, p. 6.
UL C 85, 19.4.2007, str. 6.
Karlovarské oplatky (PGI)
Karlovarské oplatky (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 745/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 745/2011
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 7(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila [1] in zlasti tretjega pododstavka člena 7(5) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Czech Republic’s application of 19 October 2004 to register the name ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 6(2) in členom 17(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Češke z dne 19. oktobra 2004 za registracijo imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
By letters dated 6 May 2008, the Commission asked the Member States concerned to seek agreement among themselves in accordance with their internal procedures.
Komisija je v dopisih z dne 6. maja 2008 zadevni državi članici pozvala, naj med seboj dosežeta dogovor v skladu z njunimi notranjimi postopki.
Given that no agreement was reached between Austria and the Czech Republic nor between Germany and the Czech Republic within the designated timeframe, the Commission must adopt a decision in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Ker Avstrija in Češka ter Češka in Nemčija v predvidenem roku niso dosegle soglasja, mora Komisija sprejeti sklep po postopku iz člena 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
Concerning the alleged failure of compliance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 regarding an absence of production in the geographical area and the quality of its reputation, the national authorities responsible confirmed that production took place in the geographical zone.
V zvezi z domnevno neskladnostjo s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 zaradi odsotnosti proizvodnje na geografskem območju in zaradi njenega velikega slovesa so pristojni nacionalni organi potrdili, da je proizvodnja potekala na geografskem območju.
The link was based on the specific quality of the product attributable to the geographical area, namely the thermal spring water used in production, which is sufficient to meet the requirements of point (b) of Article 2(1); whether or not the product also had sufficient reputation to satisfy the requirements of Article 2(1) was immaterial.
Povezava temelji na posebni kakovosti proizvoda, ki se pripisuje geografskemu območju, in sicer naravne mineralne vode, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji, kar zadošča za izpolnjevanje zahtev iz člena 2(1)(b); dejstvo, ali sloves nekega proizvoda zadošča za izpolnjevanje zahtev iz člena 2(1) ali ne, je nepomembno.
The statements of objection from Germany showed that trade marks including the term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ had been registered prior to the application for registration of the term ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ as a protected geographical indication.
Nemčija je ugovarjala, da so bile blagovne znamke, vključno z imenom „Karlsbader Oblaten“ registrirane, preden je bila predložena vloga za registracijo imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“ kot zaščitene geografske označbe.
However no evidence was provided in the statements of objection that consumers strongly associated the wafers with all or any of the trade marks as distinct from the descriptive term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’, nor that consumers would be liable to be misled as to the true identity of a product marketed under the name ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’.
Vendar v izjavah o ugovoru ni bil predložen nikakršen dokaz, da potrošniki oblate tesno povezujejo z vsemi blagovnimi znamkami ali pa katero koli blagovno znamko, ki bi bila drugačna od opisnega izraza „Karlsbader Oblaten“; prav tako ni bil predložen dokaz, da bi potrošniki lahko imeli zmotne predstave o pravi identiteti proizvoda, trženega pod imenom „Karlovarské trojhránky“.
Therefore, the Commission cannot conclude that the registration of the name ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ would be contrary to Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Komisija zato ne more skleniti, da bi bila registracija imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“ v nasprotju s členom 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
As a salient part of the names ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ and ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ is identical, it is reasonable to conclude that the names are partly identical for the purposes of point (c) of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Ker je poglavitni del imen „Karlsbader Oblaten“ in „Karlovarské trojhránky“ identičen, je upravičeno sklepati, da sta imeni za namene člena 7(3)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 delno identični.
Furthermore, given the similarities between the products and their common origins, the application of the protection envisaged by Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and in particular point (b) of paragraph (1) thereof, could have the result that ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’, if registered, would be found by a competent court to be protected against the use of ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ on the wafers concerned.
Ker imata proizvoda skupno poreklo in sta si podobna, bi lahko zaradi uporabe zaščite iz člena 13 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 in zlasti njegovega odstavka 1(b) pristojno sodišče sklenilo, da bi bilo ime „Karlovarské trojhránky“, če bi bilo registrirano, zaščiteno pred uporabo imena „Karlsbader Oblaten“ na zadevnih oblatih.
The evidence therefore shows that the continued existence of the name ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ could be jeopardised by the registration of ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ within the meaning of point (c) of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Dokazi kažejo, da bi bil v smislu člena 7(3)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 obstoj imena „Karlsbader Oblaten“ ogrožen z registracijo imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“.
The statements of objection were declared admissible on the ground, inter alia, that registration of the proposed name would jeopardise the existence of a partly identical name, namely ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’, in so far that this name is used on product and not protected under trade mark legislation.
Izjave o ugovoru so bile sprejete v postopek, med drugim zato, ker bi registracija predlaganega imena ogrozila obstoj delno identičnega imena, in sicer imena „Karlsbader Oblaten“, kolikor se to ime uporablja na proizvodu in ni zaščiteno v okviru zakonodaje o blagovnih znamkah.
Moreover, the evidence shows that the uses of the name ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ referred to an authentic and traditional product that was not exploiting the reputation of ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’.
Dokazi kažejo tudi, da se ime „Karlsbader Oblaten“ uporablja za avtentičen in tradicionalen proizvod, ki ne izkorišča slovesa imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“.
For these reasons the maximum transitional period foreseen by Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 should be foreseen.
Zato je treba predvideti maksimalno prehodno obdobje iz člena 13(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
Concerning trade marks containing the term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ that were protected through registration or acquired by use prior to the application for registration of ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’, the conditions of Article 14(1) not being met, the said trade marks cannot be invalidated nor can their continued use be hindered by virtue of the registration of ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ as a protected geographical indication, provided the general requirements under trade mark legislation are otherwise met.
Zaradi neizpolnjevanja pogojev iz člena 14(1) blagovnih znamk, ki vsebujejo ime „Karlsbader Oblaten“ in so bile zaščitene z registracijo ali privzete prek rabe pred predložitvijo vloge za registracijo imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“, ni mogoče razveljaviti ali ovirati njihove nadaljnje uporabe na podlagi registracije imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“ kot zaščitene geografske označbe, če so splošne zahteve iz zakonodaje za blagovne znamke sicer izpolnjene.
Concerning generic status, the evidence provided in the statements of objection referred to the general use of the term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ and not to that of ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’.
Kar zadeva generični status, so se dokazi, predloženi v okviru izjav o ugovoru, nanašali na občo rabo izraza „Karlsbader Oblaten“ in ne na rabo izraza „Karlovarské trojhránky“.
While the objections have provided evidence to show that a number of uses as general descriptive terms exist including the German mention ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’, no evidence has been provided that the name ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ is used to designate a category of products that do not originate in the region of Karlovy Vary.
Čeprav so bili v ugovorih predloženi dokazi, da obstajajo številni primeri uporabe v smislu splošnega opisnega izraza, vključno z nemškim izrazom „Karlsbader Oblaten“, pa ni bil predložen dokaz, da se ime „Karlovarské trojhránky“ uporablja za označevanje vrste proizvodov, ki ne izvirajo iz območja mesta Karlovy Vary.
Therefore, on the basis of information provided the name ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ cannot be considered to be generic and there is no failure of compliance with Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Na podlagi predloženih informacij zato ni mogoče skleniti, da je ime „Karlovarské trojhránky“ generično, in ne gre za kršitev člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
In the light of the above, the name ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ should be entered in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications subject to a transitional period of 5 years during which time the term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ may continue to be used in circumstances that, but for the transitional period, could be contrary to the protection provided for by Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Glede na navedeno je treba ime „Karlovarské trojhránky“ vpisati v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb pod pogojem, da se predvidi prehodno obdobje petih let, med katerim se lahko ime „Karlsbader Oblaten“ še naprej uporablja v okoliščinah, ki so izključno v prehodnem obdobju lahko v nasprotju z določbami o zaščiti iz člena 13(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
The term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ may be used to designate wafers not complying with the specification for ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ for a period of 5 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Ime „Karlsbader Oblaten“ se lahko za obdobje petih let od začetka veljave te uredbe uporablja za poimenovanje oblatov, ki niso v skladu s specifikacijo oblatov „Karlovarské trojhránky“.
Trade marks containing the term ‘Karlsbader Oblaten’ that were protected through registration or acquired by use prior to 19 October 2004, shall not be invalidated nor shall their continued use be hindered by virtue of the registration of ‘Karlovarské trojhránky’ as a protected geographical indication, provided the general requirements under trade mark legislation are otherwise met.
Blagovne znamke, ki vsebujejo ime „Karlsbader Oblaten“ in so bile zaščitene z registracijo ali privzete prek rabe pred 19. oktobrom 2004, se ne razveljavijo, prav tako nadaljnje uporabe ne ovira registracija imena „Karlovarské trojhránky“ kot zaščitene geografske označbe, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjene druge splošne zahteve zakonodaje o blagovnih znamkah.
OJ C 206, 5.9.2007, p. 29.
UL C 206, 5.9.2007, str. 29.
Karlovarské trojhránky (PGI)
Karlovarské trojhránky (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 746/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 746/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 July 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 29. julija 2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 747/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 747/2011
on the minimum customs duty to be fixed in response to the second partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 634/2011
o določanju najnižje stopnje carinskih dajatev kot odgovor na second delni javni razpis v okviru razpisnega postopka, odprtega z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 634/2011
In accordance with Article 6 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 634/2011, the Commission is to decide, in the light of the tenders received in response to a partial invitation to tender, either to fix a minimum customs duty or not to fix a minimum customs duty per eight digit CN code.
V skladu s členom 6 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 634/2011 se bo Komisija ob upoštevanju ponudb, prejetih v odgovor na delni javni razpis, odločila o tem, ali bo določila najnižjo carinsko dajatev za osemmestno oznako KN.
On the basis of the tenders received for the second partial invitation to tender, a minimum customs duty should be fixed for certain eight digit codes for sugar falling within CN code 1701 and no minimum customs duty should be fixed for the other eight digit codes for sugar falling within that CN code.
Na podlagi ponudb, prejetih na second delni javni razpis, se najmanjša carinska dajatev določi za nekatere osemmestne oznake za sladkor z oznako KN 1701 in se ne določi za druge osemmestne oznake za sladkor z navedeno KN oznako.
For the second partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 634/2011, in respect of which the time limit for the submission of tenders expired on 27 July 2011, a minimum customs duty has been fixed, or has not been fixed, as set out in the Annex to this Regulation for the eight digit codes for sugar falling within CN code 1701.
Za second delni javni razpis v okviru razpisnega postopka, odprtega z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 634/2011, se ob upoštevanju časovnega roka za predložitev ponudb, ki je potekel 27. julija 2011, v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi določi ali ne določi najmanjša carinska dajatev za osemmestne oznake za sladkor z oznako KN 1701.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 748/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 748/2011
On 19 July 2011 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to add two natural persons to its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.
Odbor za sankcije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov je 19. julija 2011 sklenil dodati dve fizični osebi na seznam oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere velja zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov.
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly.
Prilogo I k Uredbi (ES) št. 881/2002 je zato treba ustrezno posodobiti
‘Umar Patek (alias (a) Omar Patek, (b) Pa’tek, (c) Pak Taek, (d) Umar Kecil, (e) Al Abu Syekh Al Zacky, (f) Umangis Mike. Address: (a) Indonesia, (b) Philippines. Date of birth: 1970. Place of birth: Central Java, Indonesia. Nationality: Indonesian. Other information: Senior member of Jemaah Islamiyah. Date of designation referred to in Article 2a(4)(b): 19.7.2011.’.
„Umar Patek (tudi (a) Omar Patek, (b) Pa'tek, (c) Pak Taek, (d) Umar Kecil, (e) Al Abu Syekh Al Zacky, (f) Umangis Mike. Naslov: (a) Indonezija, (b) Filipini. Datum rojstva: 1970. Kraj rojstva: osrednja Java, Indonezija. Državljanstvo: indonezijsko. Druge informacije: vodilni član Jemaah Islamiyah. Datum uvrstitve na seznam iz člena 2a(4)(b): 19.7.2011.“
amending for the 153rd time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban
o stotriinpetdeseti spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z Osama bin Ladnom, mrežo Al-Kaida in talibani
‘Abdul Rahim Ba’aysir (alias (a) Abdul Rahim Bashir, (b) ’Abd Al-Rahim Ba’asyir, (c) ’Abd Al-Rahim Bashir, (d) Abdurrahim Ba’asyir, (e) Abdurrahim Bashir, (f) Abdul Rachim Ba’asyir, (g) Abdul Rachim Bashir, (h) Abdul Rochim Ba’asyir, (i) Abdul Rochim Bashir, (j) Abdurochim Ba’asyir, (k) Abdurochim Bashir, (l) Abdurrochim Ba’asyir, (m) Abdurrochim Bashir, (n) Abdurrahman Ba’asyir, (o) Abdurrahman Bashir). Address: Indonesia. Date of birth: (a) 16.11.1977, (b) 16.11.1974. Place of birth: (a) Solo, Indonesia; (b) Sukoharjo, Central Java, Indonesia. Nationality: Indonesian. Other information: (a) Senior Jemaah Islamiyah leader; (b) Father’s name is Abu Bakar Ba’asyir. Date of designation referred to in Article 2a(4)(b): 19.7.2011.’;
„Abdul Rahim Ba'aysir (tudi (a) Abdul Rahim Bashir, (b) 'Abd Al-Rahim Ba'asyir, (c) 'Abd Al-Rahim Bashir, (d) Abdurrahim Ba'asyir, (e) Abdurrahim Bashir, (f) Abdul Rachim Ba'asyir, (g) Abdul Rachim Bashir, (h) Abdul Rochim Ba'asyir, (i) Abdul Rochim Bashir, (j) Abdurochim Ba'asyir, (k) Abdurochim Bashir, (l) Abdurrochim Ba'asyir, (m) Abdurrochim Bashir, (n) Abdurrahman Ba'asyir, (o) Abdurrahman Bashir). Naslov: Indonezija. Datum rojstva: (a) 16.11.1977, (b) 16.11.1974. Kraj rojstva: (a) Solo, Indonezija; (b) Sukoharjo, osrednja Java, Indonezija. Državljanstvo: indonezijsko. Druge informacije: (a) višji vodja Jemaah Islamiyah; (b) očetovo ime je Abu Bakar Ba'asyir. Datum uvrstitve na seznam iz člena 2a(4)(b): 19.7.2011.“
Commission Regulation (EU) No 749/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 749/2011
amending Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive
o spremembi Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 142/2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi, ter o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES glede nekaterih vzorcev in predmetov, ki so izvzeti iz veterinarskih pregledov na meji v skladu z navedeno direktivo
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 [1], and in particular Article 5(2), Article 15(1)(c), the second subparagraph of Article 15(1), Article 20(10) and (11), the first and third subparagraphs of Article 41(3), Article 42(2) and Article 45(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi, ter razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 [1] ter zlasti člena 5(2), člena 15(1)(c), drugega pododstavka člena 15(1), člena 20(10) in (11), prvega in tretjega pododstavka člena 41(3), člena 42(2) in člena 45(4) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 lays down public and animal health rules for animal by-products and derived products, in order to prevent and minimise risks to public and animal health arising from those products.
Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 določa pravila v zvezi z javnim zdravjem in zdravjem živali za živalske stranske proizvode in iz njih pridobljene proizvode, da se preprečijo in kar najbolj zmanjšajo tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali zaradi navedenih proizvodov.
It also provides for the determination of an end point in the manufacturing chain for certain derived products beyond which they are no longer subject to the requirements of that Regulation.
Poleg tega določa končno točko v proizvodni verigi za nekatere pridobljene proizvode, po kateri za te proizvode ne veljajo več zahteve iz navedene uredbe.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive [2], lays down implementing rules for Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009, including rules on the determination of end points for certain derived products.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 142/2011 z dne 25. februarja 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi, ter o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES glede nekaterih vzorcev in predmetov, ki so izvzeti iz veterinarskih pregledov na meji v skladu z navedeno direktivo [2], določa pravila za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009, vključno s pravili za določanje končnih točk za nekatere pridobljene proizvode.
Denmark has submitted a request for the determination of an end point for fish oil which is used for the production of medicinal products.
Danska je predložila zahtevo za določitev končne točke za ribje olje, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji zdravil.
Since such fish oil is derived from Category 3 material and is processed under strict conditions, an end point for that oil should be determined.
Ker je takšno ribje olje pridobljeno iz snovi kategorije 3 in je predelano v strogih pogojih, je treba določiti končno točko za navedeno olje.
Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 and Annex XIII thereto should therefore be amended accordingly.
Člen 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 142/2011 in Prilogo III k navedeni uredbi je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 carried on provisions introduced to implement Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 and Commission Decision 2003/324/EC [3] in particular allowing Estonia, Latvia and Finland the feeding of certain fur animals with processed animal protein derived from the bodies or parts of bodies of animals of the same species, in particular foxes.
Uredba (EU) št. 142/2011 vsebuje določbe za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 in Odločbe Komisije 2003/324/ES [3], ki zlasti omogočajo Estoniji, Latviji in Finski, da krmijo nekatere kožuharje, zlasti lisice, s predelanimi živalskimi beljakovinami, pridobljenimi iz trupov ali delov trupov živali istih vrst.
Annex II should be amended to allow feeding of such material to both commonly kept species, the Red fox (Vulpes vulpes), currently listed, and the Arctic fox (Alopex lagopus), as Decision 2003/324/EC has been repealed by Regulation (EU) No 142/2011.
Prilogo II je treba spremeniti, da se omogoči krmljenje običajno gojenih vrst, tj. navadne lisice (Vulpes vulpes), trenutno uvrščene, in polarne lisice (Alopex lagopus), s takšnimi snovmi, saj je bila Odločba 2003/324/ES razveljavljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 142/2011.
Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 lays down certain rules for pressure sterilisation and provides for implementing measures to be adopted for other processing methods, which have to be applied to animal by-products or derived products, so that no unacceptable risks to public and animal health arise when such products are used or disposed of.
Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 določa nekatera pravila za sterilizacijo pod pritiskom in izvedbene ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti za druge metode predelave, ki jih je treba uporabljati pri živalskih stranskih proizvodih ali pridobljenih proizvodih, zato da ne nastanejo nesprejemljiva tveganja za javno zdravje in zdravje živali pri uporabi ali odstranjevanju takšnih proizvodov.