natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The application lists two distinct categories of payment services, namely: (A) existing services; and (B) services which are planned for introduction in 2012.
V prošnji sta navedeni dve različni kategoriji plačilnih storitev: A) obstoječe storitve in B) storitve, katerih uvedba je načrtovana za leto 2012.
For the purposes of the assessment pertaining to this Decision, only the existing services will be taken into account, as there is no material evidence of the effects which the planned services would have, if and once introduced.
V oceni, ki je vključena v ta sklep, se bodo upoštevale le obstoječe storitve, ker ni dokazil o tem, kakšen bo učinek načrtovanih storitev, če in ko bodo uvedene.
Posta market share for services enabling cash to be places on a payment account, calculated as a percentage of the total market as defined, represented [8] 3,91 % in 2007, 3,88 % in 2008 and 4,14 % in 2009.
Tržni delež družbe Posta na področju storitev, ki omogočajo gotovinske pologe na plačilni račun, izračunan kot odstotek celotnega trga, kot je bil opredeljen, je leta 2007 znašal [8] 3,91 %, leta 2008 3,88 % in leta 2009 4,14 %.
In terms of both volume and value, is to be noted that the number of Posta transactions and their value decreased in 2009 compared to previous two years [9].
V zvezi z obsegom in vrednostjo je treba opozoriti, da sta se leta 2009 število transakcij družbe Posta in njihova vrednost v primerjavi s predhodnima letoma zmanjšala [9].
Posta’s market share for services enabling cash withdrawals from a payment account, calculated as a percentage of the total substitute service, represented [13] 2,44 % in 2007, 2,49 % in 2008 and 2,61 % in 2009.
Tržni delež družbe Posta za storitve, ki omogočajo gotovinske dvige s plačilnega računa, izračunan kot odstotek celotne nadomestne storitve, je leta 2007 znašal [13] 2,44 %, leta 2008 2,49 % in leta 2009 2,61 %.
In terms of both volume and value, is to be noted that the number of Posta transactions and their total value had a decreasing trend in the last three years for which data are available, namely 2007, 2008 and 2009 [14].
V zvezi z obsegom in vrednostjo je treba opozoriti, da sta se število transakcij družbe Posta in njihova skupna vrednost v zadnjih treh letih, za katera so na voljo podatki, tj. leta 2007, 2008 in 2009, zmanjševala [14].
The market shares of Posta, calculated on the basis of the above consideration are as follows: for the retail current accounts and deposits: 1,45 % in 2007, 1,38 % in 2008 and 1,51 % in 2009, while on the market for corporate current account and deposits Posta market shares were negligible (0 %) in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Tržni deleži družbe Posta, izračunani ob upoštevanju zgornjih navedb, so: za transakcijske račune in vloge za prebivalstvo 1,45 % leta 2007, 1,38 % leta 2008 in 1,51 % leta 2009, medtem ko so bili tržni deleži družbe Posta na trgu za transakcijske račune in vloge za podjetja leta 2007, 2008 in 2009 zanemarljivi (0 %).
These figures indicate that market shares for the intermediation of these financial services are also low
Na podlagi teh podatkov je mogoče ugotoviti, da so nizki tudi tržni deleži za posredovanje pri teh finančnih storitvah.
granting certain parties an exemption from the extension to certain bicycle parts of the anti-dumping duty on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, lifting the suspension and revoking the exemption of the payment of the anti-dumping duty extended to certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China granted to certain parties pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97
o odobritvi izvzetja od razširitve protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2474/93 na nekatere dele za kolesa s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ter o ukinitvi opustitve in preklicu izvzetja protidampinške dajatve, razširjene na nekatere dele za kolesa s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki je bila odobrena nekaterim stranem v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 88/97
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 [2] (the ‘extending Regulation’), extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 [3] on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China, and levying the extended duty on such imports registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 703/96 [4],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 71/97 [2] („uredba o razširitvi“) o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2474/93 [3] na kolesa s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz nekaterih delov za kolesa iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in o obračunavanju razširjene dajatve na takšen uvoz, registriran po Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 703/96 [4],
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 [5] (the ‘exemption Regulation’) on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 88/97 [5] („uredba o izvzetju“) o dovoljenju za izvzetje plačila uvozne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih delov za kolesa s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, uvedene z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2474/93 in razširjene z Uredbo (ES) št. 71/97 o protidampinški dajatvi, ter zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
After the entry into force of the exemption Regulation, a number of bicycle assemblers submitted requests pursuant to Article 3 of the exemption Regulation for exemption from the anti-dumping duty as extended to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (the ‘extended anti-dumping duty’).
Po začetku veljavnosti uredbe o izvzetju so številni sestavljavci koles predložili zahtevke v skladu s členom 3 uredbe o izvzetju za izvzetje od protidampinške dajatve, kakor je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 71/97 razširjena na uvoz nekaterih delov za kolesa iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („razširjena protidampinška dajatev“).
The Commission has published in the Official Journal of the European Union successive lists of bicycle assemblers [6] for which the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty in respect of their imports of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation was suspended pursuant to Article 5(1) of the exemption Regulation.
Komisija je v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavila zaporedne sezname sestavljavcev koles [6], za katere je bilo v skladu s členom 5(1) uredbe o izvzetju opuščeno plačilo razširjene protidampinške dajatve v zvezi z njihovim uvozom bistvenih delov za kolesa, deklariranih za prosti promet.
Following the last publication of the list of parties under examination [7], a main period of examination has been selected.
Po zadnji objavi seznama strani v preiskavi [7] je bilo izbrano obdobje preiskave.
A questionnaire requesting information on the assembly operations conducted during the relevant period was sent to all parties under examination.
Vprašalnik glede informacij o dejavnostih sestavljanja v zadevnem obdobju je bil poslan vsem stranem v preiskavi.
The Commission was also informed of the liquidation of one company which was exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty on bicycle parts.
Komisija je bila prav tako obveščena o likvidaciji ene družbe, ki je bila izvzeta od protidampinških dajatev, razširjenih na dele za kolesa.
Furthermore, one company informed the Commission that it had stopped its assembly operations.
Poleg tega je ena družba obvestila Komisijo, da je prenehala z dejavnostmi sestavljanja.
The Commission received from the parties listed in table 1 below all the information required for the determination of the admissibility of their requests.
Komisija je od strani iz tabele 1 prejela vse informacije, potrebne za določitev sprejemljivosti njihovih zahtevkov.
These parties had already received their suspension with effect from the day of receipt by the Commission of a first complete request.
Te strani so že prejele svojo opustitev z začetkom veljavnosti od dne, ko Komisija prejme prvi popolni zahtevek.
Based on this information, the Commission found that the requests submitted by the parties listed in table 1 below are admissible pursuant to Article 4(1) of the exemption Regulation.
Na podlagi teh informacij je Komisija ugotovila, da so zahtevki, ki so jih predložile strani iz tabele 1, sprejemljivi v skladu s členom 4(1) uredbe o izvzetju.
It was established during the examination that for all of the applicants the value of the parts originating in the PRC used in their assembly operations was lower than 60 % of the total value of the parts used in those operations.
Med preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila pri vseh vložnikih vrednost delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, uporabljenih pri dejavnostih sestavljanja, nižja od 60 % skupne vrednosti delov, uporabljenih v navedenih dejavnostih.
Consequently, they fall outside the scope of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zato ne spadajo v področje uporabe člena 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
For this reason, and in accordance with Article 7(1) of the exemption Regulation, the parties listed in table 1 above should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty.
Zaradi tega in v skladu s členom 7(1) uredbe o izvzetju je treba strani iz zgornje tabele 1 izvzeti od razširjene protidampinške dajatve.
In accordance with Article 7(2) of the exemption Regulation, the exemption of the parties listed in table 1 above from the extended anti-dumping duty should take effect as from the date of receipt of their requests.
V skladu s členom 7(2) uredbe o izvzetju mora izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve za strani iz zgornje tabele 1 začeti veljati z datumom prejema njihovih zahtevkov.
The company CODE X Sp. z o.o. changed its address during the examination procedure.
Družba Code X Sp. z o.o. je spremenila svoj naslov med postopkom preiskave.
The company received its suspension under the address ul.
Družba je prejela opustitev na naslov ul.
Krolewska 16, 00-103 Warszawa, Poland
Krolewska 16, 00-103 Warszawa, Poljska
During the suspension period the address changed to Olszanka 109, 33-386 Podegrodzie, Poland
V obdobju začasne opustitve se je naslov spremenil v Olszanka 109, 33-386 Podegrodzie, Poljska
This change of address does not affect the initial request for suspension or the decision on the exemption.
Ta sprememba naslova ne vpliva na prvotni zahtevek za opustitev ali na sklep o izvzetju.
The company JETLANE SAS changed its name during the examination procedure.
Družba JETLANE SAS je spremenila svoje ime med postopkom preiskave.
The company was initially suspended under its name JET’LEAN SAS.
Družba je prvotno prejela opustitev na ime JET’LEAN SAS.
During the suspension period the company changed its name to JETLANE SAS.
V obdobju začasne opustitve je družba spremenila ime v JETLANE SAS.
This change of name does not affect the initial request for suspension or the decision on the exemption.
Ta sprememba imena ne vpliva na prvotni zahtevek za opustitev ali na sklep o izvzetju.
TARIC additional code A977 initially given to the company Müller GmbH was erroneously attributed twice and had to be withdrawn.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC A977, prvotno dodeljena družbi Müller GmbH, je bila po pomoti dodeljena dvakrat in jo je bilo treba razveljaviti.
On 3 June 2010 the company received TARIC additional code A978.
Družba je 3. junija 2010 prejela dodatno oznako TARIC A978.
This change of code does not affect the initial request for suspension or the decision on the exemption.
Ta sprememba oznake ne vpliva na prvotni zahtevek za opustitev ali na sklep o izvzetju.
Rejected requests for exemption
Zavrnjeni zahtevki za izvzetje
The party listed in table 2 below also submitted a request for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty.
Stran iz spodnje tabele 2 je prav tako predložila zahtevek za izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve.
The party in question assembled bicycles as subcontractor and not in its own name.
Zadevna stran je sestavljala kolesa kot podizvajalec in ne v lastnem imenu.
The company had no purchases of parts and it could not be evaluated if the assembly operations complied with the conditions set out in Article 7(1) of the exemption Regulation.
Družba ni kupovala delov in ni bilo mogoče oceniti, ali so bile dejavnosti sestavljanja v skladu s pogoji iz člena 7(1) uredbe o izvzetju.
On these grounds the Commission has to reject its request, in accordance with Article 7(3) of the exemption Regulation.
Iz teh razlogov mora Komisija zavrniti njen zahtevek v skladu s členom 7(3) uredbe o izvzetju.
Consequently, the suspension of the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty referred to in Article 5 of the exemption Regulation must be lifted and the extended anti-dumping duty collected as from the date of receipt of the request for exemption submitted by this party, i.e. the date as of which the suspension took effect.
Zato je treba ukiniti opustitev plačila razširjene protidampinške dajatve iz člena 5 uredbe o izvzetju, razširjeno protidampinško dajatev pa je treba pobrati od datuma prejema zahtevka za izvzetje, ki ga je predložila ta stran, tj. od datuma, ko je opustitev začela veljati.
For the parties listed in table 3 below the exemption is to be revoked.
Izvzetje se prekliče za strani, navedeni v spodnji tabeli 3.
These parties were exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty on bicycle parts.
Ti strani sta bili izvzeti od razširjene protidampinške dajatve na dele za kolesa.
One party now informed the Commission services that it had stopped its assembly operations.
Ena stran je obvestila službe Komisije, da je ustavila dejavnosti sestavljanja.
Following an enquiry, the Commission services were informed by a Court in Portugal that the other party had been liquidated.
Po poizvedbi je sodišče na Portugalskem obvestilo službe Komisije, da je bila druga stran likvidirana.
For both parties exemption should be revoked.
Za obe strani je treba izvzetje preklicati.
The parties listed in table 4 also submitted requests for exemption from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty:
Strani iz tabele 4 so prav tako predložile zahtevke za izvzetje od plačila razširjene protidampinške dajatve:
Zona Industrial de Oiă, Lote A e B, Apartado 175, 3770-059 Oiă
Zona Industrial de Oiã, Lote A e B, Apartado 175, 3770-059 Oiă
One of these parties is an assembler of electrical bicycles whose imports are not subject to anti-dumping duty on bicycle parts according to Regulation (EC) No 71/97.
Ena od teh strani je sestavljavec električnih koles, za uvoz katerih ne velja protidampinška dajatev na dele za kolesa v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 71/97.
This party is not eligible for an exemption.
Ta stran ne izpolnjuje pogojev za izvzetje.
For some parties the supply of parts for the production of bicycles covered by the measures according to Regulation (EC) No 71/97 falls within the de minimis threshold of less than 300 units on a monthly basis as specified in Article 14(c) of the exemption Regulation.
Za nekatere strani dobava delov za proizvodnjo koles, za katere veljajo ukrepi v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 71/97, ne presega praga de minimis, ki je manj kot 300 enot mesečno, kot je določeno s členom 14(c) uredbe o izvzetju.
Consequently, those parties did not meet the conditions of Article 4.1(a) of the exemption Regulation and an exemption could not be granted.
Zato navedene strani niso izpolnile pogojev iz člena 4.1(a) uredbe o izvzetju in izvzetja ni bilo mogoče odobriti.
Some other parties had not started the production of bicycles yet and hence no suspension could be granted to them.
Nekatere druge strani še niso začele s proizvodnjo koles in se jim zato opustitev ne more odobriti.
All companies listed in tables 1-4 above were informed and given the opportunity to comment.
Vse družbe iz tabel 1–4 so bile obveščene in so imele možnost podati pripombe.
None of the comments received were such as to alter the conclusions set out in this Decision,
Nobene druge prejete pripombe niso vplivale na spremembo sklepnih ugotovitev iz tega sklepa –
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP: Člen 1
The exemption shall take effect in relation to each party as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Izvzetje za posamezne strani začne veljati z datumom iz stolpca „Začetek veljavnosti“.
The request for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty submitted pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 by the party listed below in table 2 is hereby rejected.
Zahtevek za izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve, ki ga je stran iz tabele 2 predložila v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97, se zavrne.
The suspension of payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 is hereby lifted for the party concerned as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Opustitev plačila razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97 se za zadevno stran ukine z datumom iz stolpca „Začetek veljavnosti“.
The exemptions from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 for the parties listed below in table 3 are to be revoked pursuant to Article 10 of the exemption Regulation.
Izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97 za strani iz tabele 3 je treba razveljaviti v skladu s členom 10 uredbe o izvzetju.
The exemption from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty is hereby lifted for the parties concerned as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve se s tem ukine za zadevni strani od datuma iz stolpca „Začetek veljavnosti“.
The requests for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty made by the parties listed below in table 4 are hereby rejected.
Zahtevki za izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve, ki so jih predložile strani iz tabele 4, se zavrnejo.
List of parties for which the request for exemption is rejected
Seznam strani, katerih zahtevek za izvzetje se zavrne
This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to the parties listed in Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice in strani iz členov 1, 2, 3 in 4.
OJ L 98, 19.4.1996, p. 3.
UL L 98, 19.4.1996, str. 3.
OJ C 45, 13.2.1997, p. 3, OJ C 112, 10.4.1997, p. 9, OJ C 220, 19.7.1997, p. 6, OJ C 378, 13.12.1997, p. 2, OJ C 217, 11.7.1998, p. 9, OJ C 37, 11.2.1999, p. 3, OJ C 186, 2.7.1999, p. 6, OJ C 216, 28.7.2000, p. 8, OJ C 170, 14.6.2001, p. 5, OJ C 103, 30.4.2002, p. 2, OJ C 35, 14.2.2003, p. 3, OJ C 43, 22.2.2003, p. 5, OJ C 54, 2.3.2004, p. 2, OJ C 299, 4.12.2004, p. 4, OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 16 and OJ L 313, 14.11.2006, p. 5, OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 73, OJ C 310, 5.12.2008, p. 19, OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62, OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 106, OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 99.
UL C 45, 13.2.1997, str. 3. UL C 112, 10.4.1997, str. 9. UL C 220, 19.7.1997, str. 6. UL C 378, 13.12.1997, str. 2. UL C 217, 11.7.1998, str. 9. UL C 37, 11.2.1999, str. 3. UL C 186, 2.7.1999, str. 6. UL C 216, 28.7.2000, str. 8. UL C 170, 14.6.2001, str. 5. UL C 103, 30.4.2002, str. 2. UL C 35, 14.2.2003, str. 3. UL C 43, 22.2.2003, str. 5. UL C 54, 2.3.2004, str. 2. UL C 299, 4.12.2004, str. 4. UL L 17, 21.1.2006, str. 16 in UL L 313, 14.11.2006, str. 5. UL L 81, 20.3.2008, str. 73. UL C 310, 5.12.2008, str. 19. UL L 19, 23.1.2009, str. 62. UL L 314, 1.12.2009, str. 106.
OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 99.
UL L 136, 24.5.2011, str. 99.
This period runs from 1 January 2011 to 31 July 2011.
To obdobje traja od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. julija 2011.
Additional information from the years 2009 and 2010 was also requested.
Prav tako so bile zahtevane dodatne informacije iz let 2009 in 2010.
JETLANE SAS (initially JET’LEAN SAS)
JETLANE SAS (prvotno JET’LEAN SAS)
(initially ul.
(prvotno ul.
Article 1 The parties listed below in table 1 are hereby exempt from the extension to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the definitive anti-dumping duty on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, last amended and maintained by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005.
Strani, navedene v tabeli 1, so v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 71/97 izvzete od dokončne protidampinške dajatve, razširjene na uvoz nekaterih delov za kolesa s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, uvedene z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2474/93, ki je bila nazadnje spremenjena in se ohranja z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1095/2005.
establishing harmonised efficiency reference values for separate production of electricity and heat in application of Directive 2004/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Decision 2007/74/EC
o določitvi harmoniziranih vrednosti referenčnih izkoristkov za ločeno proizvodnjo električne energije in toplote pri uporabi Direktive 2004/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter razveljavitvi Odločbe Komisije 2007/74/ES
Having regard to Directive 2004/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the promotion of cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market and amending Directive 92/42/EEC [1], and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. februarja 2004 o spodbujanju soproizvodnje, ki temelji na rabi koristne toplote, na notranjem trgu z energijo in o spremembi Direktive 92/42/EGS [1] in zlasti člena 4(2) Direktive,
Pursuant to Directive 2004/8/EC the Commission established in Decision 2007/74/EC [2] harmonised efficiency reference values for separate production of electricity and heat, consisting of a matrix of values differentiated by relevant factors, including year of construction and types of fuel.
V skladu z Direktivo 2004/8/ES je Komisija v Odločbi 2007/74/ES [2] določila harmonizirane vrednosti referenčnih izkoristkov za ločeno proizvodnjo električne energije in toplote, ki so sestavljene iz matrike vrednosti, diferencirane po pomembnih dejavnikih, vključno z letom izdelave in vrstami goriva.
The Commission is to review the harmonised efficiency reference values for separate production of electricity and heat for the first time on 21 February 2011 and every four years thereafter, to take account of technological developments and changes in the distribution of energy sources.
Komisija harmonizirane vrednosti referenčnih izkoristkov za ločeno proizvodnjo električne energije in toplote pregleda prvič 21. februarja 2011 nato pa vsake štiri leta, da se upošteva tehnični razvoj in spremembe v porazdelitvi energijskih virov.
The Commission has reviewed the harmonised efficiency reference values for separate production of electricity and heat, taking into account data from operational use under realistic conditions, provided by the Member States.
Komisija je pregledala harmonizirane vrednosti referenčnih izkoristkov za ločeno proizvodnjo električne energije in toplote, ob upoštevanju podatkov o obratovanju v realnih razmerah, ki so jih predložile države članice.
Furthermore, on the basis of recent experience and analysis, the review confirmed that correction factors relating to the climatic situation should continue to be applied.
Nadalje je pregled na podlagi nedavnih izkušenj in analize potrdil, da je primerno še naprej uporabljati korekcijske faktorje, ki se nanašajo na povprečne podnebne razmere.
In addition, the correction factors for avoided grid losses should also continue to be applied as grid losses have not changed in recent years.
Tudi v prihodnje bi se morali uporabljati korekcijski faktorji za izgube omrežja, do katerih ni prišlo, saj na tem področju v zadnjih letih ni bilo sprememb.
Additionally, the correction factors for avoided grid losses should also apply to plants that use wood fuels and biogas.
Poleg tega se korekcijski faktorji za izgube omrežja, do katerih ni prišlo, ne uporabljajo za lesna goriva in bioplin.