natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The hearing officer should be responsible for deciding on requests for the extension of time limits set for the reply to a statement of objections, a supplementary statement of objections or a letter of facts or time limits within which other involved parties, complainants or interested third persons may make comments, in case of disagreement between any such person and the Directorate-General for Competition.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje bi moral biti pristojen za odločanje o zahtevah za podaljšanje rokov, določenih za odgovor na obvestilo o nasprotovanju, dodatno obvestilo o nasprotovanju ali dopis o dejstvih, ali rokov, v katerih lahko druge udeležene stranke, pritožniki ali zainteresirane tretje osebe podajo pripombe, v primeru nestrinjanja med katero koli od navedenih oseb in Generalnim direktoratom za konkurenco.
The hearing officer should promote the effectiveness of the oral hearing, by, inter alia, taking all appropriate preparatory measures, including the circulation, in due time before the hearing, of a provisional list of participants and a provisional agenda.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje bi moral spodbujati učinkovitost ustnega zaslišanja, med drugim s sprejetjem vseh ustreznih pripravljalnih ukrepov, vključno s pravočasnim pošiljanjem začasnega seznama udeležencev in začasnega dnevnega reda pred zaslišanjem.
The oral hearing allows the parties to whom the Commission has addressed a statement of objections and other involved parties to further exercise their right to be heard by developing their arguments orally before the Commission, which should be represented by the Directorate-General for Competition as well as other services that contribute to the further preparation of a decision to be taken by the Commission.
Ustno zaslišanje omogoča strankam, na katere je Komisija naslovila obvestilo o nasprotovanju, in drugim udeleženim strankam, da dodatno uveljavljajo svojo pravico do zaslišanja, tako da ustno pojasnijo svoje trditve pred Komisijo, ki bi jo moral predstavljati Generalni direktorat za konkurenco ter druge službe, ki prispevajo k nadaljnji pripravi sklepa, ki ga bo sprejela Komisija.
It should provide an additional opportunity to ensure that all relevant facts – whether favourable or unfavourable to the parties concerned, including the factual elements relating to the gravity and duration of the alleged infringement – are clarified as much as possible.
Moral bi zagotoviti dodatne priložnosti, da bi bila zagotovo vsa relevantna dejstva – bodisi v prid bodisi v škodo zadevnih strank, vključno z dejstvi, povezanimi s težo in trajanjem domnevne kršitve – razjasnjena v največji možni meri.
The oral hearing should also allow the parties to present their arguments as to the matters that may be of importance for the possible imposition of fines.
Ustno zaslišanje bi prav tako moralo strankam omogočiti, da predstavijo svoje trditve v zvezi s temami, ki bi lahko pomembno vplivale na morebitno naložitev glob.
To ensure the effectiveness of oral hearings, the hearing officer may allow the parties to whom a statement of objections has been addressed, other involved parties, complainants, other persons invited to the hearing, the Commission services and the authorities of the Member States to ask questions during the hearing.
Zaradi zagotovitve učinkovitosti ustnih zaslišanj lahko pooblaščenec za zaslišanje strankam, na katere je bilo naslovljeno obvestilo o nasprotovanju, drugim udeleženim strankam, pritožnikom, drugim povabljencem na zaslišanje, službam Komisije in organom držav članic dovoli, da med zaslišanjem zastavljajo vprašanja.
The oral hearing should not be public so as to guarantee that all participants can express themselves freely.
Ustno zaslišanje ne bi smelo biti javno, da se lahko vsem udeležencem zagotovi možnost svobodnega izražanja.
Therefore, information disclosed during the oral hearing should not be used for a purpose other than judicial and/or administrative proceedings for the application of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty.
Informacije, razkrite med ustnim zaslišanjem, se zato ne bi smele uporabiti v druge namene kot v namene sodnih in/ali upravnih postopkov za uporabo členov 101 in 102 Pogodbe.
Where justified to protect business secrets and other confidential information, the hearing officer should be able to hear persons in a closed session.
Kadar je to upravičeno zaradi varovanja poslovnih skrivnosti in drugih zaupnih informacij, bi moral imeti pooblaščenec za zaslišanje možnost, da se osebe zaslišijo na zaprti obravnavi.
Parties to the proceedings which offer commitments pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, as well as parties which engage in settlement procedures in cartel cases pursuant to Article 10a of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, should be able to call upon the hearing officer in relation to the effective exercise of their procedural rights.
Stranke v postopkih, ki ponudijo zaveze na podlagi člena 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003, ter stranke, ki sodelujejo v postopkih poravnave v kartelnih zadevah v skladu s členom 10a Uredbe (ES) št. 773/2004, bi morale imeti možnost, da se obrnejo na pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v zvezi z učinkovitim uveljavljanjem svojih procesnih pravic.
The hearing officer should report on the respect for the effective exercise of procedural rights throughout competition proceedings.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje bi moral ves čas postopkov o konkurenci poročati o spoštovanju učinkovitega uveljavljanja procesnih pravic.
Moreover, and separately from his or her reporting function, the hearing officer should also be able to make observations on the further progress and objectivity of the proceedings and thereby contribute to ensuring that competition proceedings are concluded on the basis of a sound assessment of all relevant facts.
Poleg tega bi moral imeti pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ločeno od svoje naloge poročanja možnost, da poda stališče v zvezi z nadaljnjim potekom in objektivnostjo postopkov ter tako prispevati k zagotovitvi, da so postopki o konkurenci sklenjeni na podlagi uravnotežene ocene vseh relevantnih dejstev.
When disclosing information about natural persons, the hearing officer should have regard, in particular, to Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [9].
Pri razkrivanju informacij o fizičnih osebah bi moral pooblaščenec za zaslišanje upoštevati Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o zaščiti posameznikov v zvezi z osebnimi podatki, ki jih obdelujejo institucije in organi Komisije, ter o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [9].
Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC should be repealed,
Sklep 2001/462/ES, ESPJ bi bilo treba razveljaviti –
ROLE, APPOINTMENT AND DUTIES OF THE HEARING OFFICER
VLOGA, IMENOVANJE IN ZADOLŽITVE POOBLAŠČENCA ZA ZASLIŠANJE
The Hearing Officer
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje
There shall be one or more hearing officers for competition proceedings, whose powers and functions are laid down in the present decision.
Obstaja eden ali več pooblaščencev za zaslišanje za postopke o konkurenci, katerih pooblastila in naloge so določene v tem sklepu.
The hearing officer shall safeguard the effective exercise of procedural rights throughout competition proceedings before the Commission for the implementation of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty, and under Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (hereinafter ‘competition proceedings’).
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje varuje učinkovito uveljavljanje procesnih pravic ves čas postopkov o konkurenci pred Komisijo za izvajanje členov 101 in 102 Pogodbe ter v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 139/2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: postopki o konkurenci).
Appointment, Termination of Appointment and Deputising
Imenovanje, prenehanje funkcije in nadomeščanje
The Commission shall appoint the hearing officer.
Komisija imenuje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje.
The appointment shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Imenovanje se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Any interruption, termination or transfer of the hearing officer shall be the subject of a reasoned decision of the Commission.
Za vsako prekinitev, prenehanje funkcije ali premestitev pooblaščenca za zaslišanje Komisija sprejme obrazložen sklep.
The hearing officer shall be attached, for administrative purposes, to the member of the Commission with special responsibility for competition (hereinafter ‘the competent member of the Commission’).
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje za upravne namene spada pod okrilje člana Komisije, posebej pristojnega za konkurenco (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pristojni član Komisije).
Where the hearing officer is unable to act, his or her role shall be carried out by another hearing officer.
Če pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ne more opravljati svojih nalog, njegovo vlogo prevzame drug pooblaščenec za zaslišanje.
If no hearing officer is able to act, the competent member of the Commission, where appropriate after consultation of the hearing officer, shall designate another competent Commission official, who is not involved in the case in question, to carry out the hearing officer’s duties.
Če noben pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ne more opravljati svojih nalog, pristojni član Komisije po potrebi po posvetovanju s pooblaščencem za zaslišanje imenuje drugega pristojnega uradnika Komisije, ki ne sodeluje v zadevnem primeru, da opravi naloge pooblaščenca za zaslišanje.
In case of an actual or potential conflict of interests, the hearing officer shall refrain from acting on a case.
V primeru dejanskega ali morebitnega navzkrižja interesov mora pooblaščenec za zaslišanje prenehati opravljati naloge v zvezi z zadevo.
Paragraph 3 shall apply.
Uporabi se odstavek 3.
Method of Operation
Način delovanja
In exercising his or her functions, the hearing officer shall act independently.
Pri opravljanju svojih nalog pooblaščenec za zaslišanje deluje neodvisno.
In exercising his or her functions, the hearing officer shall take account of the need for effective application of the competition rules in accordance with Union legislation in force and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pri opravljanju svojih nalog upošteva potrebo po učinkovitem izvajanju pravil konkurence v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Unije ter načeli, ki jih je določilo Sodišče.
In exercising his or her functions, the hearing officer shall have access to any files relating to competition proceedings.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje lahko pri opravljanju svojih nalog kadar koli med postopki dostopa do vseh spisov v zvezi s postopki o konkurenci pred Komisijo v skladu s členoma 101 in 102 Pogodbe in Uredbo (ES) št. 139/2004.
The hearing officer shall be kept informed by the director responsible for investigating the case in the Directorate-General for Competition (hereinafter ‘the director responsible’) about the development of the procedure.
Direktor, odgovoren za preiskavo zadeve v Generalnem direktoratu za konkurenco (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odgovorni direktor), obvešča pooblaščenca za zaslišanje o napredovanju postopka.
The hearing officer may present observations on any matter arising out of any Commission competition proceeding to the competent member of the Commission.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje lahko pristojnemu članu Komisije predloži stališča v vsaki zadevi, ki izhaja iz katerega koli postopka Komisije o konkurenci.
If the hearing officer makes reasoned recommendations to the competent member of the Commission or takes decisions as foreseen in this decision, the hearing officer shall provide a copy of these documents to the director responsible and the Legal Service of the Commission.
Če pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pristojnemu članu Komisije da obrazložena priporočila ali sprejme odločitve, predvidene v tem sklepu, pooblaščenec za zaslišanje predloži kopijo teh dokumentov odgovornemu direktorju in pravni službi Komisije.
Any issue regarding the effective exercise of the procedural rights of the parties concerned, other involved parties within the meaning of Article 11(b) of Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 (hereinafter ‘the other involved parties’), complainants within the meaning of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (hereinafter ‘complainants’) and interested third persons within the meaning of Article 5 of this Decision involved in such proceedings shall first be raised by those persons with the Directorate-General for Competition.
V zvezi s katerim koli vprašanjem glede učinkovitega uveljavljanja procesnih pravic zadevnih strank, drugih udeleženih strank v smislu člena 11(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 802/2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: druge udeležene stranke), pritožnikov v smislu člena 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) in zainteresiranih tretjih oseb v smislu člena 5 tega Sklepa, udeleženih v teh postopkih, se te osebe najprej obrnejo na Generalni direktorat za konkurenco.
If the issue is not resolved, it may be referred to the hearing officer for independent review.
Če vprašanje ni razrešeno, se lahko predloži pooblaščencu za zaslišanje v neodvisno proučitev.
Requests related to a measure for which a time limit applies must be made in due time, within the original time limit.
Zahteve, povezane z ukrepom, za katerega velja rok, je treba vložiti pravočasno, v prvotnem roku.
Procedural rights in the investigation phase
Procesne pravice v fazi preiskave
The hearing officer shall safeguard the effective exercise of procedural rights which arise in the context of the exercise of the Commission’s powers of investigation under Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 and in proceedings that can result in the imposition of fines pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje varuje učinkovito uveljavljanje procesnih pravic, ki nastanejo v okviru izvrševanja pooblastil Komisije za preiskavo na podlagi poglavja V Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 in v postopkih, v katerih je lahko naložena globa na podlagi člena 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 139/2004.
In particular, the hearing officer shall have the following functions, subject to Article 3(7):
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ima v skladu s členom 3(7) zlasti naslednje naloge:
The hearing officer may be asked by undertakings or associations of undertakings to examine claims that a document required by the Commission in the exercise of powers conferred on it pursuant to Article 18, 20 or 21 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, in inspections pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 or in the context of investigatory measures in proceedings that can result in the imposition of fines pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and which was withheld from the Commission is covered by legal professional privilege, within the meaning of the case-law of the Court of Justice.
Podjetja ali podjetniška združenja lahko pooblaščenca za zaslišanje prosijo, da prouči zahtevo, da za dokument, ki ga zahteva Komisija v okviru izvrševanja členov 18, 20 ali 21 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 med preiskavami v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe (ES) št. 139/2004 ali v okviru preiskovalnih ukrepov v postopkih, v katerih je lahko naložena globa na podlagi člena 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 139/2004, in ki je bil Komisiji zamolčan, velja varovanje poklicne zaupnosti sporazumevanja med odvetnikom in stranko v smislu sodne prakse Sodišča.
The hearing officer may only review the matter if the undertaking or association of undertakings making the claim consent to the hearing officer viewing the information claimed to be covered by legal professional privilege as well as related documents that the hearing officer considers necessary for his or her review.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje lahko prouči zadevo le, če se podjetje ali podjetniško združenje, ki je vložilo zahtevo, strinja, da pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pregleda informacije, za katere trdijo, da zanje velja varovanje poklicne zaupnosti sporazumevanja med odvetnikom in stranko, in povezane dokumente, ki so po mnenju pooblaščenca za zaslišanje nujni za njegovo proučitev.
Without revealing the potentially privileged content of the information, the hearing officer shall communicate to the director responsible and the undertaking or association of undertakings concerned his or her preliminary view, and may take appropriate steps to promote a mutually acceptable resolution.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje odgovornemu direktorju in zadevnemu podjetju ali podjetniškemu združenju sporoči svoje predhodno mnenje, ne da bi razkril morebitno varovano vsebino informacij, ter lahko sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za spodbuditev obojestransko sprejemljive rešitve.
Where no resolution is reached, the hearing officer may formulate a reasoned recommendation to the competent member of the Commission, without revealing the potentially privileged content of the document.
Če se rešitev ne doseže, lahko pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pristojnemu članu Komisije pošlje obrazloženo priporočilo, ne da bi razkril morebitno varovano vsebino dokumenta.
The party making the claim shall receive a copy of this recommendation.
Stranka, ki je vložila zahtevo, prejme kopijo tega priporočila.
Where the addressee of a request for information pursuant to Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 refuses to reply to a question in such a request invoking the privilege against self-incrimination, as determined by the case-law of the Court of Justice, it may refer the matter, in due time following the receipt of the request, to the hearing officer.
Kadar naslovnik zahteve po informacijah na podlagi člena 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 noče odgovoriti na vprašanje v taki zahtevi in se sklicuje na privilegij zoper samoobtožbo, kakor je opredeljen v sodni praksi Sodišča, lahko zadevo pravočasno po prejetju zahteve predloži pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
In appropriate cases, and having regard to the need to avoid undue delay in proceedings, the hearing officer may make a reasoned recommendation as to whether the privilege against self-incrimination applies and inform the director responsible of the conclusions drawn, to be taken into account in case of any decision taken subsequently pursuant to Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.
V ustreznih zadevah in ob upoštevanju potrebe po izogibanju neutemeljenim zamudam v postopkih lahko pooblaščenec za zaslišanje oblikuje obrazloženo priporočilo glede veljavnosti privilegija zoper samoobtožbo in odgovornega direktorja obvesti o sprejetih ugotovitvah, da se jih lahko upošteva pri pozneje sprejetih sklepih na podlagi člena 18(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003.
The addressee of the request shall receive a copy of the reasoned recommendation.
Naslovnik zahteve prejme kopijo obrazloženega priporočila.
Where the addressee of a decision requesting information pursuant to Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 considers that the time limit imposed for its reply is too short, it may refer the matter to the hearing officer, in due time before the expiry of the original time limit set.
Kadar naslovnik sklepa, s katerim se zahtevajo informacije na podlagi člena 18(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003, meni, da je rok, določen za odgovor, prekratek, lahko zadevo pravočasno, pred potekom prvotno določenega roka, predloži pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
The hearing officer shall decide on whether an extension of the time limit should be granted, taking account of the length and complexity of the request for information and the requirements of the investigation.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje odloči o tem, ali bi bilo treba odobriti podaljšanje roka, ob upoštevanju dolžine in kompleksnosti zahteve po informacijah ter pogojev preiskave.
Undertakings or associations of undertakings subject to an investigative measure by the Commission under Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 shall have the right to be informed of their procedural status, namely whether they are subject to an investigation and, if so, the subject matter and purpose of that investigation.
Podjetja ali podjetniška združenja, ki so predmet preiskovalnega ukrepa Komisije v okviru poglavja V Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003, imajo pravico do obveščenosti o svojem procesnem statusu, t.j. ali so predmet preiskave, in če so, o vsebini in namenu preiskave.
If such an undertaking or association of undertakings considers that it has not been properly informed by the Directorate-General for Competition of its procedural status, it may refer the matter to the hearing officer for resolution.
Če tako podjetje ali podjetniško združenje meni, da ga Generalni direktorat za konkurenco ni primerno obveščal o njegovem procesnem statusu, lahko predloži zadevo v razrešitev pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
APPLICATIONS TO BE HEARD
ZAHTEVE ZA ZASLIŠANJE
Interested third persons
Zainteresirane tretje osebe
Applications to be heard from persons other than those referred to in Articles 5 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 and third persons within the meaning of Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 (hereinafter ‘third persons’) shall be made in accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 and Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 802/2004.
Zahteve za zaslišanje oseb izven okvira členov 5 in 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 773/2004 ter tretjih oseb v smislu člena 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 802/2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: tretje osebe) se vložijo v skladu s členom 13(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 773/2004 in členom 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 802/2004.
Applications shall be submitted in writing and explain the applicant’s interest in the outcome of the procedure.
Zahteve se predložijo v pisni obliki in v njih je pojasnjen interes vlagatelja za izid postopka.
The hearing officer shall decide as to whether third persons are to be heard after consulting the director responsible.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje po posvetovanju z odgovornim direktorjem odloči o tem, ali naj se tretje osebe zaslišijo.
In assessing whether a third person shows a sufficient interest, the hearing officer shall take into account whether and to what extent the applicant is sufficiently affected by the conduct which is the subject of the competition proceedings or whether the applicant fulfils the requirements of Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje pri oceni, ali tretja oseba izkazuje zadosten interes, upošteva, ali in v kolikšni meri ravnanje, ki je predmet postopkov o konkurenci, zadostno vpliva na vlagatelja ter ali vlagatelj izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 18(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 139/2004.
Where the hearing officer considers that an applicant has not shown a sufficient interest to be heard, he or she shall inform the applicant in writing of the reasons thereof.
Kadar pooblaščenec za zaslišanje meni, da vlagatelj ni izkazal zadostnega interesa za zaslišanje, pisno obvesti vlagatelja o razlogih za to.
A time limit shall be fixed within which the applicant may make known its views in writing.
Določi se rok, v katerem lahko vlagatelj pisno izrazi svoje stališče.
If the applicant makes known its views in writing within the time limit set by the hearing officer and the written submission does not lead to a different assessment, that finding shall be stated in a reasoned decision which shall be notified to the applicant.
Če vlagatelj pisno izrazi svoje stališče v roku, ki ga je določil pooblaščenec za zaslišanje, in pisno stališče ne spremeni njegove ocene, se ta ugotovitev navede v obrazloženem sklepu, ki se vroči vlagatelju.
The hearing officer shall inform parties to competition proceedings as from the initiation of proceedings pursuant to Article 11(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 or Article 6(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of the identities of interested third persons to be heard, unless such disclosure would significantly harm a person or undertaking.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje stranke v postopkih o konkurenci obvešča od začetka postopkov na podlagi člena 11(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 ali na podlagi člena 6(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 139/2004 o identitetah zainteresiranih tretjih oseb za zaslišanje, razen če bi takšno razkritje resno škodovalo neki osebi ali nekemu podjetju.
Right to an oral hearing; participation of complainants and third persons in the oral hearing
Pravica do ustnega zaslišanja; udeležba pritožnikov in tretjih oseb na ustnem zaslišanju