natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 the quantities of those products for which import duties are to be suspended has to be determined by a separate legal act.
Vendar je treba v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 891/2009 količine proizvodov, za katere naj bi se uvozne dajatve začasno odpravile, določiti v ločenem pravnem aktu.
The import quantities of industrial sugar for which no import duties should apply for the 2010/2011 marketing year, need to be set accordingly.
V skladu s tem je treba določiti količine za uvoz industrijskega sladkorja, za katere se za tržno leto 2010/2011 ne bi uporabile uvozne dajatve.
The import duties for industrial sugar falling within CN 1701 and with order number 09.4390 shall be suspended for a quantity of 400000 tonnes from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011.
Uvozne dajatve za industrijski sladkor z oznako KN 1701 in z zaporedno številko 09.4390 se začasno odpravijo za količino 400000 ton za obdobje od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011.
It shall expire on 30 September 2011.
Veljati preneha 30. septembra 2011.
For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Za Komisijo 2a predsednika po pooblestilu
Commission Regulation (EU) No 397/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 397/2010
fixing the quantitative limit for exports of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose until the end of the 2010/2011 marketing year
o določitvi količinske omejitve za izvoz izvenkvotnega sladkorja in izvenkvotne izoglukoze do konca tržnega leta 2010/2011
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) [1], and in particular Article 61, first paragraph, point (d), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode („Uredba o enotni SUT“) [1] ter zlasti točke (d) prvega odstavka člena 61 v povezavi s členom 4 Uredbe,
For certain EU producers of sugar and isoglucose, exports from the Union represent an important part of their economic activities and they have established traditional markets outside the Union.
Za nekatere proizvajalce sladkorja in izoglukoze v EU pomeni izvoz iz Unije pomemben del gospodarskih dejavnosti in so izven Skupnosti vzpostavili tradicionalne trge.
To that end it is necessary to fix a quantitative limit for out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose exports so that the EU producers concerned may continue to supply their traditional markets.
Zato je treba za izvoz izvenkvotnega sladkorja in izvenkvotne izoglukoze določiti količinske omejitve, da bodo lahko zadevni proizvajalci EU še naprej oskrbovali svoje tradicionalne trge.
For the 2010/2011 marketing year it is estimated that fixing the quantitative limit initially at 650000 tonnes, in white sugar equivalent, for out-of-quota sugar exports and 50000 tonnes, in dry matter, for out-of-quota isoglucose would correspond to the market demand.
Ocenjuje se, da bi začetna določitev količinske omejitve za izvoz izvenkvotnega sladkorja v višini 650000 ton, v enakovredni količini belega sladkorja, in za izvoz izvenkvotne izoglukoze v višini 50000 ton suhe snovi za tržno leto 2010/2011 ustrezala tržnemu povpraševanju.
Exports of sugar from the Union to certain close destinations and to third countries granting EU products a preferential import treatment are currently in a particular favorable competitive position.
Izvoz sladkorja iz Unije v nekatere bližnje namembne države in v tretje države, ki proizvodom iz EU priznavajo preferencialni uvozni režim, je trenutno v posebno ugodnem konkurenčnem položaju.
In view of the absence of appropriate instruments of mutual assistance to fight against irregularities and in order to minimize the risk of fraud and to prevent any abuse associated with the re-import or reintroduction into the Union of out-of-quota sugar certain close destinations should be excluded from the eligible destinations.
Zaradi odsotnosti ustreznih instrumentov za medsebojno pomoč v boju proti nepravilnostim ter da bi čim bolj zmanjšali tveganje goljufije in preprečili morebitne zlorabe v zvezi s ponovnim uvozom ali ponovnim vnosom izvenkvotnega sladkorja v Unijo, je treba s seznama upravičenih namembnih držav izključiti nekatere bližnje namembne države.
For the 2010/2011 marketing year, running from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011, the quantitative limit referred to in Article 61, first paragraph, point (d) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be 650000 tonnes for exports without refund of out-of-quota white sugar falling within CN code 170199.
Za tržno leto 2010/2011, ki traja od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011, znaša količinska omejitev iz točke (d) prvega odstavka člena 61 Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 za izvoz brez nadomestila izvenkvotnega sladkorja, ki spada pod oznako KN 170199, 650000 ton.
third countries: Andorra, Liechtenstein, the Holy Seat (Vatican City State), San Marino, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia [3], Montenegro, Albania and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia;
tretje države: Andora, Lihtenštajn, Sveti sedež (Vatikanska mestna država), San Marino, Hrvaška, Bosna in Hercegovina, Srbija [3], Črna gora, Albanija in Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija;
territories of Member States not forming part of the customs territory of the Community: the Faeroe Islands, Greenland, Heligoland, Ceuta, Melilla, the communes of Livigno and Campione d’Italia, and the areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control;
ozemlja držav članic, ki niso del carinskega območja Skupnosti: Ferski otoki, Grenlandija, Heligoland, Ceuta, Melilla, občini Livigno in Campione d’Italia in območja Republike Ciper, v katerih vlada Republike Ciper ne izvaja učinkovitega nadzora;
European territories for whose external relations a Member State is responsible, not forming part of the customs territory of the Community: Gibraltar.
evropska ozemlja, za zunanje odnose katerih je odgovorna država članica, vendar niso del carinskega območja Skupnosti: Gibraltar.
For the 2010/2011 marketing year, running from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011, the quantitative limit referred to in Article 61, first paragraph, point (d) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be 50000 tonnes, in dry matter, for exports without refund of out-of-quota isoglucose falling within CN codes 17024010, 17026010 and 17029030.
Za tržno leto 2010/2011, ki traja od 1. oktobra 2010 do 30. septembra 2011, znaša količinska omejitev iz točke (d) prvega odstavka člena 61 Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 za izvoz brez nadomestila izvenkvotne izoglukoze, ki spada pod oznake KN 17024010, 17026010 in 17029030, 50000 ton suhe snovi.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 398/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 398/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 May 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 8. maja 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 399/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 399/2010
It shall apply from 8 May 2010.
Uporablja se od 8. maja 2010.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 8 May 2010
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 8. maja 2010
Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 400/2010
Izvedbena Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 400/2010
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea or not, and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Malaysia
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1858/2005 na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Republike Koreje, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Republiki Koreji ali ne, in zaključku preiskave v zvezi z uvozom, poslanim iz Malezije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the European Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je Evropska komisija predložila po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom,
By Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999 [2], (the ‘original Regulation’), the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties of 60,4 % on imports of steel ropes and cables (SWR) originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China (the ‘PRC’ or ‘China’).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1796/1999 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve v višini 60,4 % na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov („JŽV“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „Kitajska“).
These measures will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original measures’ and the investigation that led to the measures imposed by the original Regulation will be hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Ti ukrepi se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenujejo „prvotni ukrepi“, preiskava, ki je privedla do ukrepov, uvedenih s prvotno uredbo, pa se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „prvotna preiskava“.
In 2004, after it was found that the original measures were circumvented by the transhipment of Chinese-origin SWR via Morocco in accordance with Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the measures were extended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1886/2004 [3] to imports of the same SWR consigned from Morocco.
Ko je bilo ugotovljeno, da se prvotnim ukrepom izogiba s pretovarjanjem JŽV s poreklom iz Kitajske prek Maroka v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe, so se leta 2004 ukrepi z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1886/2004 [3] razširili na uvoz enakih JŽV, poslanih iz Maroka.
Similarly, after it was found the circumvention of the original measures on imports from Ukraine took place via Moldova following an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the measures were extended by Council Regulation (EC) No 760/2004 [4] to imports of the same steel ropes and cables consigned from Moldova.
Podobno, ko je bilo po preiskavi v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe ugotovljeno, da se prvotnim ukrepom pri uvozu iz Ukrajine izogiba prek Moldavije, so bili ukrepi z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 760/2004 [4] razširjeni na uvoz enakih jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Moldavije.
By Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 [5] the Council, following an expiry review (the ‘expiry review’), imposed, in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of SWR originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China, at the level of the original measures.
Svet je po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov („pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 1858/2005 [5] v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz JŽV s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske na ravni prvotnih ukrepov.
The duty thus imposed remains in force and will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the measures in force’.
Tako uvedena dajatev velja še naprej in se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenuje „veljavni ukrepi“.
On 29 June 2009, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on SWR originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Komisija je 29. junija 2009 v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe prejela zahtevek za preiskavo mogočega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz JŽV s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The request was submitted by the Liaison Committee of the EU Wire Rope Industries (EWRIS) on behalf of the Union producers of steel ropes and cables (the ‘applicant’).
Zahtevek je vložil Povezovalni odbor industrije žičnatih vrvi Evropske unije („EWRIS“) v imenu proizvajalcev jeklenih vrvi in kablov v Uniji („vložnik“).
The request alleged that, following the imposition of the anti-dumping measures, a significant change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC and the Republic of Korea and Malaysia to the Union took place, for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the measures in force.
V zahtevku je bilo navedeno, da se je po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov znatno spremenil vzorec trgovanja, ki vključuje izvoz iz LRK ter Republike Koreje in Malezije v Unijo, ter da za tako spremembo razen uvedbe veljavnih ukrepov ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko upravičena.
This change in the pattern of trade stemmed allegedly from the transhipment of SWR originating in the PRC via the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.
Ta sprememba vzorca trgovanja je domnevno posledica pretovarjanja JŽV s poreklom iz LRK prek Republike Koreje in Malezije.
The request further alleged that the remedial effects of the measures in force were being undermined both in terms of quantity and price.
V zahtevku je bilo tudi navedeno, da je bil popravljalni učinek veljavnih ukrepov oslabljen v smislu količine in cene.
In addition, there was sufficient evidence that these increased imports from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia were made at prices well below the non-injurious price established in the original investigation.
Poleg tega so obstajali zadostni dokazi, da se je obseg uvoza iz Republike Koreje in Malezije povečal pri cenah, ki so dosti nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
Finally, the applicant alleged that the prices of SWR consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia were dumped in relation to the normal value established for the like product during the original investigation.
Nazadnje je vložnik trdil, da so cene JŽV, poslanih iz Republike Koreje in Malezije, dampinške v primerjavi z normalno vrednostjo, določeno za podoben izdelek v prvotni preiskavi.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated an investigation by Regulation (EC) No 734/2009 [6] (the ‘initiating Regulation’).
Ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni prima facie dokazi za začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe, je začela preiskavo z Uredbo (ES) št. 734/2009 [6] („uredba o začetku preiskave“).
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, by the initiating Regulation, also directed the customs authorities to register imports of SWR consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe z uredbo o začetku preiskave carinskim organom naložila, naj registrirajo uvoz JŽV, poslanih iz Republike Koreje in Malezije.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia, the producers/exporters and the traders in those countries, as well as the importers in the Union known to be concerned and the applicant Union industry of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila organe LRK, Republike Koreje in Malezije, proizvajalce/izvoznike in trgovce v navedenih državah ter uvoznike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter industrijo Unije, ki je vložila zahtevek za začetek preiskave.
Questionnaires were sent to the known producers/exporters in the PRC, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia known to the Commission from the request or through the Missions of the Republic of Korea and Malaysia to the European Union or which made themselves known within the deadlines specified in Article 3(1) of the initiating Regulation.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani znanim proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK, Republiki Koreji in Maleziji, ki so bili Komisiji znani iz zahtevka ali prek misij Republike Koreje in Malezije pri Evropski uniji ali ki so se sami javili v rokih iz člena 3(1) uredbe o začetku preiskave.
Questionnaires were also sent to traders in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia and to the importers in the Union named in the request.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani tudi trgovcem v Republiki Koreji in Maleziji ter uvoznikom v Uniji, navedenim v zahtevku.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da v roku iz uredbe o začetku preiskave v pisni obliki izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Fifteen producers/exporters and two traders in the Republic of Korea, two producers/exporters in Malaysia, five producers/exporters in China, two related importers, ten unrelated importers in the Union and the European Wire Rope Importers Association made themselves known.
Javilo se je petnajst proizvajalcev/izvoznikov in dva trgovca iz Republike Koreje, dva proizvajalca/izvoznika iz Malezije, pet proizvajalcev/izvoznikov iz Kitajske, dva povezana uvoznika, deset nepovezanih uvoznikov iz Unije in Evropsko združenje uvoznikov žičnatih vrvi.
Several other companies claimed that they are not involved in the production or export of the product under investigation.
Več drugih družb je trdilo, da niso vključene v proizvodnjo ali izvoz izdelka v preiskavi.
The following companies submitted replies to the questionnaires and verification visits were subsequently carried out at their premises:
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so predložile spodaj naštete družbe, nato pa so bili v njihovih prostorih opravljeni preveritveni obiski:
Producers/exporters in the Republic of Korea:
proizvajalci/izvozniki v Republiki Koreji:
DSR Wire Corp., Suncheon-City and its related company DSR Corp., Busan,
DSR Wire Corp., Suncheon-City in njena povezana družba DSR Corp., Busan,
Shin Han Rope Co., Ltd, Incheon,
Shin Han Rope Co.,Ltd, Incheon,
Trader in the Republic of Korea:
trgovec v Republiki Koreji:
Producers/exporters in Malaysia:
proizvajalci/izvozniki v Maleziji:
Producers/exporters in the PRC:
proizvajalci/izvozniki v LRK:
Related importers:
povezana uvoznika:
Kiswire Europe, the Netherlands,
Kiswire Europe, Nizozemska,
Verope AG, Switzerland.
Verope AG, Švica.
The investigation period covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 (the ‘IP’).
Obdobje preiskave je zajemalo obdobje od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 („OP“).
Data was collected for the period from 1999 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade.
Za preiskavo domnevne spremembe vzorca trgovanja so se zbrali podatki za obdobje od leta 1999 do konca OP.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was made by analysing successively whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between third countries and the Union, if this change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty, if there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the like product, and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe se je obstoj izogibanja ocenjeval z zaporedno analizo, ali se je vzorec trgovanja med tretjimi državami in Unijo spremenil, ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dejavnosti, za katero razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko upravičena, ali so dokazi o škodi ali da se popravljalni učinek dajatve spodkopava s cenami in/ali količinami podobnega izdelka in ali so dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, predhodno določenimi za podobni izdelek, po potrebi v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
Product concerned and the like product
Zadevni izdelek in podobni izdelek
The product concerned is, as defined in the original investigation, steel ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm (in industry terminology often referred to as SWR), originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 and ex73121098 (the product concerned).
V skladu z opredelitvijo iz prvotne preiskave so zadevni izdelek jeklene vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, razen vrvi in kablov iz nerjavnega jekla, s prečnim prerezom največ 3 mm (ki se v industrijski terminologiji pogosto navajajo kot jeklene žičnate vrvi ali JŽV), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 in ex73121098 („zadevni izdelek“).
The product under investigation is steel ropes and cables including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia, whether declared as originating in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia or not (the product under investigation), currently falling within the same CN codes as the product concerned.
Izdelek v preiskavi so jeklene vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, razen vrvi in kablov iz nerjavnega jekla, s prečnim prerezom največ 3 mm, poslani iz Republike Koreje in Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Republiki Koreji in Maleziji ali ne, („izdelek v preiskavi“), trenutno uvrščeni pod iste oznake KN kot zadevni izdelek.
The investigation showed that the SWR exported to the Union from the PRC and those consigned from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo JŽV, izvožene v Unijo iz LRK, in JŽV, poslane v Unijo iz Republike Koreje in Malezije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične značilnosti ter enake uporabe, zato jih je treba šteti za podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe. Raven sodelovanja in določitev obsega trgovine
Degree of cooperation and determination of the trade volumes
Stopnja sodelovanja in določitev obsega trgovanja
As stated above in recital 11, fourteen exporters/producers in the Republic of Korea, one Korean trader, two exporting producers in Malaysia and three exporting producers in China cooperated by submitting questionnaire replies.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 11 zgoraj, je v preiskavi sodelovalo štirinajst izvoznikov/proizvajalcev iz Republike Koreje, en korejski trgovec, dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz Malezije in trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz Kitajske, ki so predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike.
After the submission of its questionnaire reply, one Korean company notified the Commission that it went bankrupt and therefore it withdrew its cooperation.
Ena korejska družba je po predložitvi izpolnjenega vprašalnika Komisijo obvestila, da je šla v stečaj, in je tako umaknila sodelovanje.
In the case of another Korean company the application of Article 18(1) was found to be warranted for the reasons set out in recital 47.
Za drugo korejsko družbo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je uporaba člena 18(1) upravičena iz razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodni izjavi 47.
The cooperating Korean exporting producers covered 81 % of the total Korean exports to the Union in the IP as reported in Comext.
Po podatkih COMEXT so sodelujoči korejski proizvajalci izvozniki v OP opravili 81 % celotnega korejskega izvoza v Unijo.