natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is, however, necessary that further surveys be carried out.
Vendar je potrebno izvajanje nadaljnjih raziskav.
Those surveys should be monitored by experts under the authority of the Commission.
Navedene raziskave morajo spremljati strokovnjaki v okviru pooblastil Komisije.
Therefore Sardinia should be recognised as a protected zone in respect of grapevine flavescence dorée MLO for a period of three years only.
Zato se Sardinija prizna kot varovano območje glede škodljivega organizma Grapevine flavescence dorée MLO samo za obdobje treh let.
in the second column of points 4, 5 and 7 to 10 of heading (a), after the word ‘Greece’ the words ‘(until 31 March 2011)’ are replaced by ‘(until 31 March 2014)’;
V drugem stolpcu točk 4, 5, 7 do 10 naslova (a) se besede „(do 31. marca 2011)“ za besedo „Grčija“ nadomestijo z „(do 31. marca 2014)“.
in the second column of point 2 of heading (b), after the word ‘Spain’ the words ‘(except the autonomous community of Castilla y León),’ are added;
V drugem stolpcu točke 2 naslova (b) se za besedo „Španija“ dodajo besede „(razen avtonomne pokrajine Castilla y León)“.
heading (d) is amended as follows:
Točka (d) se spremeni:
in the second column of point 3, after the word ‘Greece’ the words ‘(except the Prefecture of Argolida),’ are added;
V drugem stolpcu točke 3 se za besedo „Grčija“ dodajo besede „(razen prefekture Argolida)“.
Czech Republic, France (Alsace, Champagne-Ardenne and Lorraine), Italy ((Basilicata) and (Sardinia, until 31 March 2014))’
Češka, Francija (Alzacija, Šampanja-Ardeni in Lorena), Italija ((Bazilikata) in (Sardinija do 31. marca 2014))“
Winsl. et al. Spain has submitted information showing that Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Winsl. et al.. Španija je predložila podatke, iz katerih je razvidno, da je Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
The entire territory of the Czech Republic, certain regions of France (Alsace, Champagne-Ardenne and Lorraine) and one region in Italy (Basilicata) were recognised as protected zones with respect to grapevine flavescence dorée MLO until 31 March 2011.
Celotno ozemlje Češke, nekatere regije Francije (Alzacija, Šampanja-Ardeni in Lorena) in ena regija Italije (Bazilikata) so bili priznani kot varovana območja glede škodljivega organizma Grapevine flavescence dorée MLO do 31. marca 2011.
Information supplied by the Czech Republic, France and Italy since that recognition was granted, has provided evidence that that harmful organism does not occur in the protected zones concerned.
Informacije, ki so jih po dodelitvi priznanja predložile Češka, Francija in Italija, so priskrbele dokaze, da se navedeni škodljivi organizem ne pojavlja na zadevnih varovanih območjih.
The current recognition of some of these protected zones expires on 31 March 2011.
Sedanje priznanje nekaterih teh varovanih območij se izteče 31. marca 2011.
Therefore, this Regulation should apply from 1 April 2011 so as to allow an uninterrupted recognition of all protected zones.
Zato je treba to uredbo uporabljati od 1. aprila 2011, da se omogoči neprekinjeno priznavanje vseh varovanih območij.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 437/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 437/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 May 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 6. maja 2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 438/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 438/2011
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 430/2011 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 430/2011 [4].
OJ L 113, 3.5.2011, p. 10.
UL L 113, 3.5.2011, str. 10.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 6 May 2011
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 6. maja 2011
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 439/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 439/2011
of 6 May 2011
z dne 6. maja 2011
on a derogation from Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised tariff preferences to take account of the special situation of Cape Verde regarding exports of certain fisheries products to the European Union
o odstopanju od Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 glede opredelitve pojma „izdelek s poreklom“, ki se uporablja za splošno shemo tarifnih preferencialov, z namenom da se upošteva posebni položaj Zelenortskih otokov glede izvoza nekaterih ribiških proizvodov v Evropsko unijo
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [2], and in particular Article 89 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [2] in zlasti člena 89 Uredbe,
By Commission Regulation (EC) No 815/2008 [3] Cape Verde was granted a derogation from the rules of origin laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 allowing it to consider as originating in Cape Verde certain processed fishery products produced in Cape Verde from non-originating fish.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 815/2008 [3] je Zelenortskim otokom dodelila odstopanje od pravil o poreklu, določenih v Uredbi (EGS) št. 2454/93, kar nekaterim predelanim ribiškim proizvodom, proizvedenim na Zelenortskih otokih iz rib brez porekla omogoča, da se obravnavajo kot predelani ribiški proizvodi s poreklom z Zelenortskih otokov.
That derogation expired on 31 December 2010.
To odstopanje je prenehalo veljati 31. decembra 2010.
By Commission Regulation (EU) No 894/2010 [4] Cape Verde was granted an increase in the quantities provided for in 2010 in respect of two of the three categories of fishery products covered by Regulation (EC) No 815/2008.
Z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 894/2010 [4] je bilo Zelenortskim otokom odobreno povečanje količin, določenih za leto 2010 za dve od treh skupin ribiških proizvodov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 815/2008.
The quantities of the derogation were raised accordingly to 2500 tonnes for prepared or preserved mackerel fillets and to 875 tonnes for prepared or preserved frigate tuna or frigate mackerel fillets.
Količine odstopanja so bile ustrezno povečane na 2500 ton za pripravljene ali konzervirane filete skuše in na 875 ton za filete pripravljenega ali konzerviranega fregatnega trupca ali trupca.
By letter dated 21 October 2010 Cape Verde submitted a request for a prolongation of the said derogation.
Zelenortski otoki so s pismom z dne 21. oktobra 2010 predložili zahtevo za podaljšanje veljavnosti navedenega odstopanja.
By letters dated 3 and 21 December 2010, and 14 January 2011 it submitted additional information in support of this request.
V pismih z dne 3. in 21. decembra 2010 ter 14. januarja 2011 so v podporo temu zahtevku predložili dodatne informacije.
The request is for a prolongation for 1 year and a volume of 2500 tonnes for prepared or preserved mackerel fillets and 875 tonnes for prepared or preserved frigate tuna or frigate mackerel.
Pri zahtevku gre za podaljšanje za eno leto in za količino 2500 ton za pripravljene ali konzervirane filete skuše in na 875 ton za filete pripravljenega ali konzerviranega fregatnega trupca ali trupca.
Between 2008 and 2010 the total annual quantities originally granted contributed to a significant extent to improving the situation in the fishery processing sector and, to a certain extent, to the revitalisation of Cape Verde’s artisanal fleet, which is of vital importance for that country.
Med letoma 2008 in 2010 so skupne letne količine, ki so bile prvotno dodeljene, znatno pripomogle k izboljšanju položaja ribiškega predelovalnega sektorja in nekoliko k ponovni oživitvi flote za mali priobalni ribolov Zelenortskih otokov, ki je življenjskega pomena za to državo.
However, fully revitalising the Cape Verdean fleet to the degree envisaged requires a further increase in available capacity to provide enough originating raw materials to Cape Verde’s fish processing industries.
Vendar je za popolno oživitev zelenortske flote do predvidene stopnje potrebno dodatno povečanje razpoložljivih zmogljivosti, da se zelenortski industriji za predelavo rib zagotovi dovolj surovin s poreklom.
The request demonstrates that, without the derogation, the ability of the Cape Verdean fish processing industry to continue to export to the Union would be significantly affected, which might deter further development of the Cape Verdean fleet for small pelagic fishing.
Zahtevek kaže, da bi odsotnost odstopanja bistveno vplivala na sposobnost zelenortske industrije predelave rib za nadaljnji izvoz v Unijo, kar bi lahko preprečilo nadaljnji razvoj zelenortske flote za mali pelagični ribolov.
The derogation serves to give Cape Verde sufficient time to prepare itself to comply with the rules for the acquisition of preferential origin.
Smisel odstopanja je, da imajo Zelenortski otoki na voljo dovolj časa za pripravo na skladnost s pravili o pridobitvi preferencialnega porekla.
Time is needed to ensure that the efforts to revitalise the local fishing fleet continue and Cape Verde thereby improves its ability to supply the local fishery processing sector with originating fish.
Potreben je čas, da se zagotovijo stalna prizadevanja za oživitev domače ribiške flote in da Zelenortski otoki tako izboljšajo svojo sposobnost za preskrbo domačega sektorja za predelavo rib z ribami s poreklom.
Since the prolongation is requested for a period starting on 1 January 2011, in order to ensure continuity of imports from Cape Verde to the Union, a new derogation should be granted with retroactive effect as of 1 January 2011.
Ker se podaljšanje zaproša za obdobje, ki se začne 1. januarja 2011, da se zagotovi stalen uvoz z Zelenortskih otokov v Unijo, je treba odobriti novo odstopanje s povratnim učinkom od 1. januarja 2011.
In order to allow the temporary derogation to be limited to the time needed for Cape Verde to achieve compliance with the rules, the derogation should be granted for a period of 1 year in respect of 2500 tonnes for prepared or preserved mackerel fillets and 875 tonnes for prepared or preserved frigate tuna or frigate mackerel.
Da se lahko začasno odstopanje omeji na čas, ki je potreben, da Zelenortski otoki dosežejo skladnost s pravili, je treba odobriti odstopanje za obdobje enega leta ob upoštevanju količin 2500 ton za pripravljene ali konzervirane filete skuše in 875 ton za filete pripravljenega ali konzerviranega fregatnega trupca ali trupca.
In order to ensure efficient management conducted in close cooperation between the authorities of Cape Verde, the customs authorities of the Union and the Commission, those rules should apply mutatis mutandis to the quantities imported under the derogation granted by this Regulation.
Zaradi učinkovitega upravljanja, ki ga v tesnem sodelovanju izvajajo organi Zelenortskih otokov, carinski organi Unije in Komisija, bi se morala pravila smiselno uporabljati za količine, uvožene v skladu z odstopanjem, ki je odobreno s to uredbo.
In order to allow more efficient monitoring of the operation of the derogation, it is necessary to lay down the obligation for the authorities of Cape Verde, in accordance with Article 89(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93, to communicate regularly to the Commission details of the certificates of origin Form A which have been issued.
Za učinkovitejše spremljanje izvajanja odstopanja je treba določiti obveznost organov Zelenortskih otokov v skladu s členom 89(4) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93, da Komisijo redno obveščajo o podrobnostih izdanih potrdil o poreklu na Obrazcu A.
By way of derogation from Articles 72, 73, 75 to 79 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93, prepared or preserved mackerel, frigate tuna and frigate mackerel of CN codes 16041511 and ex16041998 produced in Cape Verde from non-originating fish shall be regarded as originating in Cape Verde in accordance with the arrangements set out in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of this Regulation.
Z odstopanjem od členov 72, 73, 75 do 79 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 se pripravljene ali konzervirane skuše, fregatni trupec in trupec s tarifnimi oznakami KN 16041511 in ex16041998, ki so bili proizvedeni na Zelenortskih otokih iz rib brez porekla, obravnavajo kot ribe s poreklom z Zelenortskih otokov v skladu z ureditvami iz členov 2, 3 in 4 te uredbe.
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to products exported from Cape Verde and declared for free circulation in the Union, where the conditions specified in Article 74 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 are satisfied, during the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011, up to the quantities listed in the Annex against each product imported.
Odstopanje iz člena 1 velja za proizvode, izvožene iz Zelenortskih otokov in deklarirane za prosti promet v Uniji, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 74 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93, v obdobju od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2011, do višine v Prilogi navedenih količin za vsak uvožen izdelek.
The quantities set out in the Annex to this Regulation shall be managed in accordance with Articles 308a, 308b and 308c of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.
Količine iz Priloge k tej uredbi se upravljajo v skladu s členi 308a, 308b in 308c Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93.
The following shall be entered in box 4 of certificate of origin Form A issued by the competent authorities of Cape Verde pursuant to this Regulation: ‘Derogation — Regulation (EU) No 439/2011’.
Na potrdilo o poreklu Obrazec A, ki ga v skladu s to uredbo izdajo pristojni organi Zelenortskih otokov, se v polje 4 vpiše: „Odstopanje – Uredba (EU) št. 439/2011“.
The competent authorities of Cape Verde shall forward to the Commission every quarter a statement of the quantities in respect of which certificates of origin Form A have been issued pursuant to this Regulation and the serial numbers of those certificates.
Pristojni organi Zelenortskih otokov vsako četrtletje Komisiji pošljejo poročilo o količinah, za katere so v skladu s to uredbo izdali potrdilo o poreklu na Obrazcu A, in zaporedne številke teh potrdil.
Done at Brussels, 6 May 2011.
V Bruslju, 6. maja 2011
OJ L 266, 9.10.2010, p. 39.
UL L 266, 9.10.2010, str. 39.
Quantity (in tonnes net weight)
Količina (v tonah neto teže)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 440/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 440/2011
on the authorisation and refusal of authorisation of certain health claims made on foods and referring to children’s development and health
o odobritvi in zavrnitvi odobritve nekaterih zdravstvenih trditev na živilih, ki se nanašajo na razvoj in zdravje otrok
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 health claims made on foods are prohibited unless they are authorised by the Commission in accordance with that Regulation and included in a list of permitted claims.
Zdravstvene trditve na živilih so v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1924/2006 prepovedane, razen če jih Komisija v skladu z navedeno uredbo odobri in uvrsti na seznam dovoljenih trditev.
Any decision to amend the lists of permitted health claims shall include the particulars referred to in Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 including, inter alia, and as the case may be, specific conditions of use.
Kakršna koli odločitev za spremembo seznama dovoljenih zdravstvenih trditev mora vsebovati podrobnosti iz člena 16(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006, med drugim in glede na okoliščine posebne pogoje uporabe.
The eight opinions referred to in this Regulation are related to applications for health claims referring to the effects of essential fatty acids on children’s development and health, as referred to in Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.
Osem mnenj v tej uredbi se nanaša na vloge za zdravstvene trditve v zvezi z učinkom esencialnih maščobnih kislin na razvoj in zdravje otrok, kot je določeno v členu 14(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006.
Following three applications from Mead Johnson & Company, submitted on 19 January 2008 pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and requesting the protection of proprietary data for nineteen studies, the Authority was required to deliver three opinions on health claims related to the effects of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) on visual development (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-211 [2], EFSA-Q-2008-688 [3] and EFSA-Q-2008-689 [4]).
Družba Mead Johnson & Company je 19. januarja 2008 v skladu s členom 14(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 vložila tri vloge in zahtevala zakonsko zaščito podatkov za devetnajst študij, Agencija pa je morala pripraviti tri mnenja o zdravstvenih trditvah v zvezi z vplivi dokozaheksaenojske kisline (DHA) in arahidonske kisline (ARA) na razvoj vida (vprašanja št. EFSA-Q-2008-211 [2], EFSA-Q-2008-688 [3] in EFSA-Q-2008-689 [4]).
The claims proposed by the applicant were worded, respectively, as follows: ‘DHA and ARA contribute to the optimal visual development of infants and young children’, ‘Lipil® contributes to optimal visual development of infants and young children’ and ‘Enfamil® Premium contributes to optimal visual development of infants’.
Vlagatelj je predlagal naslednje trditve: „DHA in ARA pomagata pri optimalnem razvoju vida pri dojenčkih in malih otrocih“, „Lipil® pomaga pri optimalnem razvoju vida pri dojenčkih in malih otrocih“ in „Enfamil® Premium pomaga pri optimalnem razvoju vida pri dojenčkih“.
Lipil® and Enfamil® Premium, as stated by the applicant, contain DHA and ARA at specific levels and ratio.
Vlagatelj navaja, da Lipil® in Enfamil® Premium vsebujeta določen delež DHA in ARA v specifičnem razmerju.
On the basis of the data submitted, the Authority concluded in its opinions received by the Commission on 13 February and 23 March 2009 respectively that a cause and effect relationship had been established between the intake of infant and follow-on formulae supplemented with DHA and the visual development in infants either breastfed until weaning or having received a DHA-enriched formula containing 0,3 % of fatty acids as DHA from birth until weaning.
Na podlagi predloženih podatkov je Agencija v svojih mnenjih, ki jih je Komisija prejela 13. februarja 2009 in 23. marca 2009, sklenila, da je bila vzročno-posledična povezava med vnosom začetne in nadaljevalne formule z dodano DHA ter razvojem vida pri dojenčkih, ki so bili dojeni z materinim mlekom do zaključka dojenja ali so od rojstva do zaključka dojenja prejemali formulo z dodano DHA, ki je vsebovala 0,3 % maščobnih kislin v obliki DHA, utemeljena.
The Authority noted that it could not have reached this conclusion without considering seven studies claimed by the applicant as proprietary.
Agencija je pripomnila, da tega ne bi mogla ugotoviti brez obravnave sedmih študij, za katere je vlagatelj zahteval zakonsko zaščito podatkov.
Further, the Authority concluded that a cause and effect relationship had not been established between the intake of ARA and the claimed effect.
Agencija je tudi ugotovila, da med vnosom ARA in navedeno trditvijo ni vzročno-posledične povezave.
Following the receipt of the Authority’s opinions in relation to the applications referred to in Question No EFSA-Q-2008-211, EFSA-Q-2008-688 and EFSA-Q-2008-689, the Commission went back to the applicant for further clarification on the justification provided regarding the seven studies claimed as proprietary and in particular regarding the ‘exclusive right of reference’ as referred to in Article 21(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.
Po prejemu mnenj Agencije v zvezi z vlogami iz vprašanj št. EFSA-Q-2008-211, št. EFSA-Q-2008-688 in št. EFSA-Q-2008-689, je Komisija vlagatelja prosila za nadaljnje pojasnilo utemeljitve glede sedmih študij, za katere je vlagatelj zahteval zakonsko zaščito podatkov, in zlasti glede „izključne pravice sklicevanja“ iz člena 21(1)(b) Uredbe št. 1924/2006.
All the justifiable information provided by the applicant has been assessed.
Ocenjene so bile vse upravičljive informacije, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj.
As all seven studies had been published prior to the submission of the applications for authorisation of the health claims and in the light of the objectives of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 among which is the protection of the investment made by innovators in gathering the information and data supporting an application under that Regulation, their protection is not justified and accordingly it should not be granted.
Vseh sedem študij je bilo objavljenih pred vložitvijo vlog za odobritev zdravstvenih trditev in glede na cilje Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006, med katerimi je zaščita naložb inovatorjev v zbiranje informacij in podatkov v podporo uporabi v skladu z navedeno uredbo, zakonska zaščita podatkov v zvezi s temi študijami ni utemeljena, zato se ne sme odobriti.
Following an application from Merck Selbstmedikation GmbH, submitted on 16 January 2008 pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to the effects of DHA on visual development of the unborn child and breastfed infant (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-675) [7].
Družba Merck Selbstmedikation GmbH je 16. januarja 2008 v skladu s členom 14(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 vložila vlogo, Agencija pa je morala pripraviti mnenje o zdravstveni trditvi v zvezi z vplivi DHA na razvoj vida pri nerojenem otroku in dojenčku, dojenem z materinim mlekom (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2008-675) [7].
The claim proposed by the applicant was worded as follows: ‘DHA is important for early development of the eyes in the foetus (unborn child) and infant.
Vlagatelj je predlagal naslednjo trditev: „DHA je pomembna v zgodnji fazi razvoja oči pri fetusu (nerojenem otroku) in dojenčku.
Maternal DHA supply contributes to the child’s visual development’.
Oskrba z DHA prek matere pomaga pri razvoju otrokovega vida.“
On the basis of the data submitted, the Authority concluded in its opinion received by the Commission on 23 April 2009 that there was insufficient evidence to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of supplementary DHA during pregnancy and lactation and visual development in unborn children or breastfed infants.
Agencija je v svojem mnenju, ki ga je Komisija prejela 23. aprila 2009, na podlagi predloženih podatkov sklenila, da ni bilo zadostnih dokazov za utemeljitev vzročno-posledične povezave med uživanjem dodatne DHA med nosečnostjo in dojenjem ter razvojem vida pri nerojenih otrocih ali dojenčkih, dojenih z materinim mlekom.
Following an application from Merck Selbstmedikation GmbH, submitted on 16 January 2008 pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to the effects of DHA on cognitive development (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-773) [8].
Družba Merck Selbstmedikation GmbH je 16. januarja 2008 v skladu s členom 14(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 vložila vlogo, Agencija pa je morala pripraviti mnenje o zdravstveni trditvi v zvezi z vplivi DHA na kognitivni razvoj (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2008-773) [8].
The claim proposed by the applicant was worded as follows: ‘DHA is important for early development of the brain in the foetus (unborn child) and infant.
Vlagatelj je predlagal naslednjo trditev: „DHA je pomembna v zgodnji fazi razvoja možganov pri fetusu (nerojenem otroku) in dojenčku.
Maternal DHA supply contributes to the child’s cognitive development’.
Oskrba z DHA prek matere pomaga pri kognitivnem razvoju otroka.“
On the basis of the data submitted, the Authority concluded in its opinion received by the Commission on 23 April 2009 that there was insufficient evidence to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of supplementary DHA during pregnancy and lactation and cognitive development in unborn children or breastfed infants.
Agencija je v svojem mnenju, ki ga je Komisija prejela 23. aprila 2009, na podlagi predloženih podatkov sklenila, da ni bilo zadostnih dokazov za utemeljitev vzročno-posledične povezave med uživanjem dodatne DHA med nosečnostjo in dojenjem ter kognitivnim razvojem nerojenih otrok ali dojenčkov, dojenih z materinim mlekom.