natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As regards the existence of alleged countervailable subsidisation, the complainant has provided the European Commission with evidence of specific subsidy programmes regarding preferential loans, income tax preferential rates, benefits from establishment in free trade zones, indirect tax and import tariff programmes, grant programmes, preferential rate for government provision of goods and services and preferential policies at the level of local government.
V zvezi z obstojem domnevnega subvencioniranja, proti kateremu se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, je pritožnik Evropski komisiji predložil dokaze o nekaterih subvencijskih programih, ki zadevajo preferenčna posojila, preferenčno stopnjo davkov na prihodek, ugodnosti poslovalnic na območjih proste trgovine, programe za posredne davke in uvozne tarife, programe za dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev, zagotavljanje blaga in storitev s strani vlade po preferenčni stopnji ter preferenčne politike na ravni lokalne uprave.
The applicant also requests that imports of the product concerned are made subject to registration pursuant to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Vložnik tudi zahteva, da se uvede evidentiranje uvoza zadevnih izdelkov na podlagi člena 24(5) osnovne uredbe, tako da se ukrepi lahko pozneje uporabijo za navedeni uvoz od datuma takega evidentiranja.
GROUNDS FOR THE REGISTRATION
RAZLOGI ZA EVIDENTIRANJE
According to Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation, provisional measures may not be imposed earlier than 60 days from initiation.
V skladu s členom 12(1) osnovne uredbe začasnih ukrepov ni dovoljeno uvesti prej kot v 60 dneh po začetku postopka.
However, according to Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive countervailing duty may be levied on products which were entered for consumption not more than 90 days prior to the date of application of provisional measures, provided that the conditions set out in that paragraph are fulfilled, and imports have been registered in accordance with Article 24(5).
Vendar se v skladu s členom 16(4) osnovne uredbe dokončna izravnalna dajatev lahko obračuna za izdelke, uvožene za potrošnjo največ 90 dni pred datumom začetka uporabe začasnih ukrepov, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz navedenega odstavka in je uvoz evidentiran v skladu s členom 24(5).
According to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission may, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom carinskim organom naroči, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za evidentiranje uvoza, ki se nato lahko uporabijo proti navedenemu uvozu od datuma takega evidentiranja.
Imports may be made subject to registration following a request from the Union industry which contains sufficient evidence to justify such action.
Uvoz se lahko evidentira na podlagi zahtevka industrije Unije z zadostnimi dokazi, ki upravičujejo tak ukrep.
The request contains sufficient evidence to justify registration.
Zahtevek vsebuje zadostne dokaze, ki upravičujejo evidentiranje.
The alleged subsidies consist, inter alia, of income tax programmes (e.g. income tax exemptions or reductions under the two free/three half programme, income tax reductions for high or new technology industries, income tax credits for domestically owned companies purchasing domestically produced equipment), indirect tax and import tariff programmes (e.g. value-added tax (‘VAT’) and tariff exemptions on imported equipment), preferential lending schemes (e.g. policy loans including export financing from State-owned commercial banks and government policy banks), grant programmes (e.g. the Development Fund for the Electronics and Information Industry (‘IT Fund’), the state key technologies renovation project fund, famous brands awards), government provision of goods and services for less than adequate numeration (e.g. provision of land use rights) as well as of local government preferential policies, including benefits in special zones and industrial parks (e.g. preferential policies in Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing, Xian).
Domnevne subvencije med drugim vključujejo programe za davek na prihodek (npr. oprostitve davka na prihodek ali znižanja v okviru programa, po katerem družbe prvi dve leti od ustanovitve ne plačujejo davka, naslednja tri leta pa le po polovični davčni stopnji, znižanja davka na prihodek za industrije na področju visokih ali novih tehnologij, davčne odbitke za družbe v domači lasti, ki nabavljajo doma proizvedeno opremo), posredni davek in programe uvoznih tarif (npr. davek na dodano vrednost (DDV) in tarifne oprostitve na uvoženo opremo), preferenčne sheme posojil (npr. posojila, vključno s financiranjem izvoza državnih komercialnih bank in državnih bank), programe za dodelitev nepovratnih sredstev (npr. Razvojni sklad za elektroniko in informacijsko industrijo (IT – sklad), državni projektni sklad za modernizacijo ključnih tehnologij, nagrade za posebno prepoznavnost blagovnih znamk, zagotavljanje blaga in storitev s strani vlade za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo (npr. zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišča), preferenčne politike lokalnih uprav, vključno z ugodnostmi na posebnih območjih in v industrijskih parkih (npr. preferenčne politike v Shenzhenu, Šanghaju, Pekingu, Xianu).
It is alleged that the above schemes are subsidies since they involve a financial contribution from the Government of the People’s Republic of China or other regional Governments (including public bodies) and confer a benefit to the recipients, i.e. to the exporting producers of the product under investigation.
Trdi se, da so zgoraj navedene sheme subvencije, ker vključujejo finančni prispevek vlade Ljudske republike Kitajske ali drugih regionalnih vlad (vključno z javnimi organi) ter dodeljujejo ugodnosti prejemnikom, tj. proizvajalcem izvoznikom izdelka v preiskavi.
They are alleged to be contingent upon export performance and/or upon the use of domestic over imported goods and/or limited to certain enterprises or groups of enterprises and/or products and/or regions, and therefore specific and countervailable.
Trdi se, da so pogojene z opravljanjem izvoza in/ali prednostno uporabo domačega blaga pred uvoženim in/ali omejene na nekatere družbe in/ali izdelke in/ali regije, zaradi česar so specifične in se proti njim lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
The request provides sufficient evidence of critical circumstances where for the subsidised product in question injury which is difficult to repair is caused by massive imports benefiting from countervailable subsidies in a relatively short period of time.
Zahtevek vsebuje zadostne dokaze o kritičnih okoliščinah, v katerih se zadevnemu subvencioniranemu izdelku povzroča škoda, ki jo je težko odpraviti, zaradi velike količine v sorazmerno kratkem času uvoženega izdelka, za katerega se uporabljajo subvencije, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
Evidence of such circumstances include the rapid nature of the deterioration of the situation of the Union industry, the fact that a single producer exists in the Union and the significant amount of R & D expenses that must be undertaken to generate the product concerned.
Dokazi o takšnih okoliščinah vključujejo hitro poslabšanje položaja industrije Unije, dejstvo, da v Uniji obstaja en sam proizvajalec, ter znatne izdatke za raziskave in razvoj, ki so potrebni za zadevni izdelek.
Against this background, the complainant has provided evidence that imports of the product under investigation from the country concerned have increased significantly overall in absolute terms and in terms of market share.
V zvezi z navedenim je pritožnik predložil dokaze, da se je uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz zadevne države po absolutnem obsegu in tržnem deležu na splošno znatno povečal.
As regards the injury caused by these massive imports, the evidence provided by the complainant shows that the volume and the prices of the imported product under investigation have, among other consequences, had a negative impact on the quantities sold, the level of the prices charged and the market share held by the Union industry, resulting in substantial adverse effects on the overall performance, the financial situation and the employment situation of the Union industry.
Glede škode, povzročene s tem uvozom velike količine izdelka, je iz dokazov, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, razvidno, da so obseg in cene uvoženega izdelka v preiskavi med drugim negativno vplivali na prodane količine, raven zaračunanih cen in tržni delež industrije Unije, kar znatno škodi celotnemu poslovanju, finančnemu stanju in stanju na področju zaposlovanja industrije Unije.
It follows that the Commission has at its disposal sufficient evidence that, in order to preclude the recurrence of such injury, it may be necessary to assess countervailing duties retroactively.
Iz tega sledi, da ima Komisija na voljo zadostne dokaze, da je za preprečitev ponovitve takšne škode morda treba retroaktivno obračunati izravnalne dajatve.
Accordingly, the conditions for registration in this case are met.
Glede na to so pogoji za evidentiranje v tem primeru izpolnjeni.
In the light of the above, the Commission has concluded that the applicant’s request contains sufficient evidence to make imports of the product concerned subject to registration, in accordance with Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je glede na navedeno sklenila, da vložnikov zahtevek vsebuje zadostne dokaze za uvedbo evidentiranja uvoza zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe.
All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing and to provide supporting evidence.
Vse zainteresirane strani so vabljene, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo ustrezne dokaze.
Pursuant to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product concerned [2] should be made subject to registration in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings leading to the imposition of countervailing duties, those duties, can, if the necessary conditions are fulfilled, be levied retroactively in accordance with applicable legal provisions.
Na podlagi člena 24(5) osnovne uredbe je treba evidentirati uvoz zadevnega izdelka [2], da se navedene dajatve ob izpolnitvi potrebnih pogojev lahko zaračunajo retroaktivno v skladu z veljavnimi pravnimi določbami, če bodo rezultati preiskave privedli do uvedbe izravnalnih dajatev.
Any future liability would emanate from the findings of the anti-subsidy investigation.
Vsaka prihodnja obveznost mora izhajati iz ugotovitev protisubvencijske preiskave.
It is not possible to give an estimated amount of possible future liability since this will depend on the amount of countervailable subsidies found to exist and the manner in which they would need to be allocated to the product under investigation.
Zneska možnih prihodnjih obveznosti ni mogoče oceniti, saj bo ta odvisen od višine ugotovljenih subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, ter načina, na katerega jih bo treba dodeliti izdelku v preiskavi.
Any personal data collected in this investigation will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [3],
Vsi osebni podatki, zbrani v tej preiskavi, bodo obdelani v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [3] –
The Customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 24(5) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009, to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union of wireless wide area networking (WWAN) modems with a radio antenna and providing Internet Protocol (IP) data connectivity for computing devices and including Wi-Fi routers comprising a WWAN modem (WWAN/Wi-Fi routers) originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex84718000 and ex85176200 (TARIC codes 8471800010, 8517620011 and 8517620091).
Carinskim organom se na podlagi člena 24(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 597/2009 naroči, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za evidentiranje uvoza v Unijo modemov za brezžično prostrano omrežje (WWAN) z radijsko anteno in podatkovno povezljivostjo prek internetnega protokola (IP) za računalniške naprave, vključno z usmerjevalniki Wi-Fi z modemom WWAN (usmerjevalniki WWAN/Wi-Fi), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščenih v oznaki KN ex84718000 in ex85176200 (oznake TARIC 8471800010, 8517620011 in 8517620091).
Registration shall expire nine months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation
Evidentiranje preneha veljati devet mesecev po datumu začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
All interested parties are invited to make their views known in writing, to provide supporting evidence or to request to be heard within 20 days from the date of publication of this Regulation.
Vse zainteresirane strani so pozvane, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča, zagotovijo ustrezne dokaze ali zaprosijo za zaslišanje v 20 dneh od datuma objave te uredbe.
For information purposes, please note that the Commission Regulation (EU) No 570/2010, OJ L 163, 30.6.2010, p. 34, already directed the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports of the product concerned from the People’s Republic of China.
Pri tem se upošteva podatek, da Uredba Komisije (EU) 570/2010, UL L 163, 30.6.2010, str. 34 že določa, da carinski organi sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za evidentiranje uvoza zadevnih izdelkov iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
This action was taken in respect of the request for registration made in the context of the complaint for an anti-dumping proceeding (for further details, please refer to the Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of wireless wide area networking (WWAN) modems originating in the People’s Republic of China, (OJ C 171, 30.6.2010, p. 9).
Ti ukrepi so bili sprejeti na podlagi zahtevka za evidentiranje v okviru pritožbe za protidampinški postopek (za nadaljnje informacije glej Obvestilo o začetku protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza modemov za brezžično prostrano omrežje (WWAN) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL C 171 z dne 30.6.2010, str. 9).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 812/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 812/2010
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain continuous filament glass fibre products originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih izdelkov iz brezkončnih steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
On 17 December 2009, the Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports of certain continuous filament glass fibre products originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or the ‘country concerned’).
Komisija je 17. decembra 2009 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], naznanila začetek protidampinškega postopka pri uvozu nekaterih izdelkov iz brezkončnih steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“).
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 3 November 2009 by APFE - European Glass Fiber Producers Association (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Union production of certain continuous filament glass fibre products.
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 3. novembra 2009 vložila Evropska zveza proizvajalcev steklenih vlaken – APFE („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 %, celotne proizvodnje Unije nekaterih izdelkov iz brezkončnih steklenih vlaken.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, other known Union producers, the exporting producers and the representatives of the PRC, importers, suppliers and users known to be concerned, as well as their associations, of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike in predstavnike LRK, uvoznike, dobavitelje in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, vključno z njihovimi združenji, uradno seznanila z začetkom postopka.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predstavijo svoja stališča v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers, importers and Union producers, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation for the determination of dumping and injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi domnevno velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov, uvoznikov in proizvajalcev Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za določitev dampinga in škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers, importers and Union producers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the investigation period (1 October 2008 – 30 September 2009).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, je pozvala vse proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike in proizvajalce Unije, da se ji javijo in predložijo, kot določa obvestilo o začetku, osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom v obdobju preiskave (od 1. oktobra 2008 do 30. septembra 2009).
Eight Chinese exporting producers or groups of exporting producers and seven Union producers or groups of producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Osem kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov in sedem proizvajalcev ali skupin proizvajalcev Unije je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
After examination of the information submitted, and given the high number of exporting producers and Union producers which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was necessary with regard to these producers (see recitals (12) and (13) below).
Po proučitvi predloženih informacij in ob upoštevanju velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov in proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili pripravljeni sodelovati, je bilo sklenjeno, da je za te proizvajalce potrebno vzorčenje (glej uvodni izjavi (12) in (13)).
With regard to unrelated importers, at the sampling stage of the investigation, only three importers provided the requested information within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation.
Glede nepovezanih uvoznikov so v fazi vzorčenja v preiskavi samo trije uvozniki predložili zahtevane informacije v rokih iz obvestila o začetku.
It was therefore decided not to apply sampling and to send questionnaires to all importers that had come forward.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se vzorčenje ne uporabi in da se pošljejo vprašalniki vsem uvoznikom, ki so se javili.
In order to allow the sampled exporting producers in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the sampled exporting producers.
Da bi vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK lahko predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želijo, jim je Komisija poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
All sampled (groups of) companies requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation or IT should the investigation establish that they did not meet the conditions for MET.
Vse vzorčene družbe (vzorčene skupine družb) so zahtevale TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe, ali pa IO, če bi preiskava pokazala, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the sampled exporting producers, sampled Union producers, to importers, and to all known users and user associations.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, uvoznikom ter vsem znanim uporabnikom in združenjem uporabnikov.
Full questionnaire replies were received from the sampled exporting producers in the PRC, from all sampled Union producers, two importers and 13 users.
V celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike so predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK, vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, dva uvoznika in 13 uporabnikov.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a provisional determination of dumping, resulting injury or threat of injury and Union interest.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za začasno ugotovitev dampinga, nastale škode ali nevarnosti škode in interesa Unije.
Exporting producers in the PRC
proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK:
Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation (‘CPIC’)
Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation („CPIC“),
Jushi Group (Jushi Group Co., Ltd.; Jushi Group Chengdu Co., Ltd.; Jushi Group Jiujiang Co. Ltd.; Jushi P-D Interglas Co. Ltd.; China National Building Materials & Equipment Import and Export Corporation; CNBM International Corporation; Tongxiang Leishi Mineral Powder Co., Ltd.; Tongxiang Juzhen Mining Co., Ltd.; Tongxiang Jinshi Precious Metal Equipment Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Songyang Mingshi Mining Co., Ltd. and Zhenshi Group Zhejiang Yushi Int Logistics), and
Jushi Group (Jushi Group Co., Ltd.; Jushi Group Chengdu Co., Ltd.; Jushi Group Jiujiang Co. Ltd.; Jushi P-D Interglas Co. Ltd.; China National Building Materials & Equipment Import and Export Corporation; CNBM International Corporation; Tongxiang Leishi Mineral Powder Co., Ltd.; Tongxiang Juzhen Mining Co., Ltd.; Tongxiang Jinshi Precious Metal Equipment Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Songyang Mingshi Mining Co., Ltd. in Zhenshi Group Zhejiang Yushi Int Logistics) ter
New Changhai Group (Changzhou New Changhai Fiberglass Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Changhai Composite Materials Holding Co., Ltd.)
New Changhai Group (Changzhou New Changhai Fiberglass Co., Ltd. in Jiangsu Changhai Composite Materials Holding Co., Ltd.);
Union producers
proizvajalci Unije:
Johns Manville Slovakia, Trnava, Slovakia
Johns Manville Slovakia, Trnava, Slovaška;
European Owens Corning Fiberglas, Brussels, Belgium
European Owens Corning Fiberglas, Bruselj, Belgija;
Owens Corning France, Chambéry, France
Owens Corning France, Chambéry, Francija;
PPG Industries BV, Hoogezand, The Netherlands
PPG Industries BV, Hoogezand, Nizozemska;
Union users
uporabniki Unije:
Sabic Europe BV, Sittard, The Netherlands and Genk, Belgium
Sabic Europe BV, Sittard, Nizozemska in Genk, Belgija;
Sabic Innovative Plastics BV, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
Sabic Innovative Plastics BV, Bergen op Zoom, Nizozemska;
Cam Elyaf Sanayii A.Ș, Turkey.
Cam Elyaf Sanayii A.Ș, Turčija.