natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Mexico a 40000 tonnes capacity increase for ethanolamine production took place during the period considered while available information suggests that a switch from MEG production to ethanolamine production should be expected.
V Mehiki se je med obravnavanim obdobjem zmogljivost proizvodnje etanolaminov povečala za 40000 ton, razpoložljive informacije pa kažejo, da je treba pričakovati prehod s proizvodnje MEG na proizvodnjo etanolaminov.
Overall ethanolamine pricing deteriorated towards the end of 2008 from an all time high in the third quarter and the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2008.
Splošne cene etanolamina so se z rekordnih cen v tretji četrtini in začetku četrte četrtine leta 2008 proti koncu leta 2008 znižale.
Subsequently, prices weakened due to weak demand and much lower ethylene costs [18].
Posledično so se cene nižale zaradi slabega povpraševanja in precej nižjih stroškov etilena [18].
DOW Chemical has claimed that the crisis will not have a significant impact on the ethanolamine business, that the current crisis is bottoming out and prices are expected to pick up again during the second half of 2009.
Družba Dow Chemical je trdila, da kriza ne bo imela bistvenega vpliva na poslovanje z etanolamini, da je sedanja kriza dosegla dno in da se bodo cene v drugi polovici leta 2009 ponovno dvignile.
The Union industry on the other hand claimed that demand has fallen by 30 %, their sales prices have fallen sharply and this decrease was higher than the decrease in price of the relevant raw material used for the production of ethanolamines, namely EO and ammonia.
Industrija Unije pa je na drugi strani trdila, da se je povpraševanje zmanjšalo za 30 %, da so njene prodajne cene strmo padle in da je to znižanje cen večje od znižanja cen zadevnih surovin, ki se uporabljajo za proizvodnjo etanolaminov, in sicer EO in amoniaka.
In addition, textile applications in the USA have also observed a downwards trend over the time and then a levelling off in 2007.
Poleg tega je bil v uporabi tekstila v ZDA opazen trend upadanja, ki se je nato v letu 2007 izravnal.
All in all, Dow Chemical’s claims regarding the economic crisis and the future development in prices were not confirmed by any available public information submitted during the present investigation.
Gledano v celoti, trditev družbe Dow Chemical glede gospodarske krize in prihodnjega razvoja cen niso potrdile nobene javne informacije, razpoložljive med sedanjo preiskavo.
At the same time demand on the US market is expected to grow at a slightly lower pace than in the Union and excess capacity in the USA is expected to be absorbed at the earliest by 2013.
Hkrati se pričakuje, da bo povpraševanje na ameriškem trgu raslo nekoliko počasneje kot v Uniji in da se bo presežna zmogljivost v ZDA absorbirala najprej do leta 2013.
Furthermore, US producers have an incentive to increase their sales to the Union market, should measures be repealed, since in a number of instances prices in the Union were found to be higher than prices charged either in the domestic USA market or in any other export market served by the US producers during the RIP.
Poleg tega imajo ob morebitni razveljavitvi ukrepov ameriški proizvajalci spodbudo, da povečajo prodajo na trg Unije, saj je bilo v številnih primerih ugotovljeno, da so cene v Uniji višje od cen, zaračunanih na notranjem trgu ZDA ali drugih izvoznih trgih, ki so jih med OPP oskrbovali ameriški proizvajalci.
Furthermore, according to the available information, this producer has plans to expand capacity in the Union by the end of 2010.
Poleg tega ima glede na razpoložljive informacije ta proizvajalec načrte za širitev zmogljivosti v Uniji do konca leta 2010.
In line with the above, that company can be considered as a genuine Union producer since its imports are not the core part of its business activity.
V skladu z navedenim se ta družba lahko šteje za dejanskega proizvajalca Unije, saj njen uvoz ni temeljni del njene poslovne dejavnosti.
The likelihood of a recurrence of injury as described in the previous section is exacerbated by the fact that the ethalonamine market has changed following the economic crisis that came to the fore in autumn 2008.
Verjetnost ponovitve škode, opisane v prejšnjem oddelku, povečuje dejstvo, da se je trg etanolamina spremenil zaradi gospodarske krize, ki se je začela jeseni leta 2008.
Many key parameters have changed considerably, both as far as exports and the situation of the Union industry are concerned.
Številni ključni parametri so se znatno spremenili tako glede izvoza kot položaja industrije Unije.
This could benefit new investments in 2010.
To bi lahko koristilo novim naložbam v letu 2010.
Therefore, it is in the interest of the Union industry to maintain measures against dumped imports from the USA.
Zato je v interesu industrije Unije, da se ukrepi proti dampinškemu uvozu iz ZDA ohranijo.
Moreover, US excess capacity is expected to disappear gradually towards 2013 and there are capacity expansions plans in the Union by the end of 2010.
Poleg tega se bo presežna zmogljivost ZDA do leta 2013 postopoma zmanjšala, v Uniji pa obstajajo načrti za povečanje zmogljivosti do konca leta 2010.
The latter considerations, combined with the uncertainty of the impact of the current world economic crisis on the ethanolamine market (both at worldwide level but even more importantly at Union level), warrant the limitation of the maintenance of the measures to two years,
Slednji premisleki, skupaj z negotovostjo glede vpliva sedanje svetovne gospodarske krize na trg etanolamina (na svetovni ravni in zlasti na ravni Unije), utemeljujejo omejitev ohranitve ukrepov na dve leti –
Commission Regulation (EU) No 55/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 55/2010
of 21 January 2010
z dne 21. januarja 2010
establishing a prohibition of fishing for whiting in ICES zone IV and EC waters of IIa by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
o prepovedi ribolova na mola v vodah ES con ICES IV in IIa s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Belgije
Done at Brussels, 21 January 2010.
V Bruslju, 21. januarja 2010
WHG — Whiting (Merlangius merlangus)
WHG – Mol (Merlangius merlangus)
IV and EC waters of IIa
Vode ES con IIa in IV
Commission Regulation (EU) No 56/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 56/2010
establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in ICES zone IV and EC waters of IIa by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands
o prepovedi ribolova na raže v vodah ES con ICES IIa in IV s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Nizozemske
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije,
According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2009,
Po podatkih, ki jih je prejela Komisija, se je z ulovi staleža iz Priloge k tej uredbi s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo države članice iz Priloge ali so v njej registrirana, izčrpala dodeljena kvota za leto 2009.
Skates and rays (Rajidae)
Raže (Rajidae)
EC waters of IIa and IV
Vode ES con IIa in IV
Commission Regulation (EU) No 57/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 57/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 January 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 22. januarja 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 58/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 58/2010
Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products [3] and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 19 January 2010.
V skladu s členom 6 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1454/2007 z dne 10. decembra 2007 o določitvi skupnih pravil za uvedbo razpisnega postopka za določitev izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kmetijske proizvode [3] in po pregledu predloženih ponudb je primerno, da se za razpisno obdobje, ki se zaključi 19. januarja 2010, ne dodeli nobeno nadomestilo.
For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 19 January 2010, no export refund shall be granted for the product and destinations referred to in point (c) of Article 1 and in Article 2 respectively of that Regulation.
V okviru stalnega razpisa, odprtega z Uredbo (ES) št. 619/2008 za razpisno obdobje, ki se zaključi 19. januarja 2010, se za proizvod iz člena 1(c) in namembne kraje iz člena 2 navedene uredbe ne dodeli nobeno nadomestilo.
For the Commission On behalf of the President,
Za Komisijo, za predsednika po pooblastilu,
Commission Regulation (EU) No 59/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 59/2010
Export refunds on eggs applicable from 22 January 2010
Izvozna nadomestila za jajca od 22. januarja 2010 dalje
Commission Regulation (EU) No 60/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 60/2010
Rates of the refunds applicable from 22 January 2010 to eggs and egg yolks exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty
Stopnje nadomestil, ki se od 22. januarja 2010 uporabljajo za jajca in jajčne rumenjake, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi
Commission Regulation (EU) No 61/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 61/2010
For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 19 January 2010, no export refund shall be granted for the products and destinations referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 1 and in Article 2 of that Regulation.
V okviru stalnega razpisa, odprtega z Uredbo (ES) št. 619/2008 za razpisno obdobje, ki se zaključi 19. januarja 2010, se ne dodeli nobeno izvozno nadomestilo za proizvode in namembne kraje iz člena 1(a) in (b) ter člena 2 navedene uredbe.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 62/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 62/2010
Commission Regulation (EC) No 993/2009 [6] should therefore be repealed and replaced by a new regulation.
Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 993/2009 [6] je zato treba razveljaviti in jo nadomestiti z novo uredbo.
Regulation (EC) No 993/2009 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (ES) št. 993/2009 se razveljavi.
OJ L 278, 23.10.2009, p. 9.
UL L 278, 23.10.2009, str. 9.
Export refunds on beef and veal applicable from 22 January 2010
Izvozna nadomestila v sektorju govejega mesa, ki se uporabljajo od 22. januarja 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 63/2010
UredbaKomisije (EU) št. 63/2010
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
EVROPSA KOMISIJA JE –
Export refunds on poultrymeat applicable from 22 January 2010
Izvozna nadomestila za perutninsko meso od 22. januarja 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 64/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 64/2010
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
EVROPSKA KOMISIJA JE –
Export refunds on pigmeat applicable from 22 January 2010
Izvozna nadomestila za prašičje meso od 22. januarja 2010 dalje
Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 65/2010
to the Commission Regulation of 21 January 2010 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 21. januarja 2010 o določitvi reprezentativnih cen v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za jajčni albumin in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1484/95
Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (ES) št. 66/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the EU Ecolabel
o znaku EU za okolje
The aim of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme [4] was to establish a voluntary ecolabel award scheme intended to promote products with a reduced environmental impact during their entire life cycle and to provide consumers with accurate, non-deceptive, science-based information on the environmental impact of products.
Cilj Uredbe (ES) št. 1980/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. julija 2000 o spremenjenem sistemu Skupnosti za podeljevanje znaka za okolje [4] je bil uvesti prostovoljni sistem za podeljevanje znaka za okolje, namenjen uveljavljanju proizvodov z manjšim vplivom na okolje v njihovem celotnem življenjskem krogu in zagotavljanju, da imajo potrošniki na voljo točne, nezavajajoče in znanstveno utemeljene informacije o vplivu proizvodov na okolje.
The experience gained during the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 has shown the need to amend that ecolabel scheme in order to increase its effectiveness and streamline its operation.
Izkušnje, pridobljene pri izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1980/2000, so pokazale, da je treba navedeni sistem za podeljevanje znaka za okolje spremeniti, zato da bi se povečala njegova učinkovitost in racionaliziralo njegovo delovanje.
The amended scheme (hereinafter ‘the EU Ecolabel scheme’) should be implemented in compliance with the provisions of the Treaties, including, in particular, the precautionary principle as laid down in Article 174(2) of the EC Treaty.
Spremenjen sistem za podeljevanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „sistem za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje“) bi moral biti izvajan skladno z določbami pogodb, vključno s previdnostnim načelom iz člena 174(2) Pogodbe ES.
It is necessary to ensure coordination between the EU Ecolabel scheme and the establishment of the requirements in the context of Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy related products [5].
Treba je zagotoviti usklajenost med sistemom za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje in uvedbo zahtev v okviru Direktive 2009/125/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o vzpostavitvi okvira za določanje zahtev za okoljsko primerno zasnovo izdelkov, povezanih z energijo [5].
The EU Ecolabel scheme is part of the sustainable consumption and production policy of the Community, which aims at reducing the negative impact of consumption and production on the environment, health, climate and natural resources.
Sistem za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje je del politike Skupnosti za trajnostno porabo in proizvodnjo, katere cilj je zmanjšati negativni vpliv porabe in proizvodnje na okolje, zdravje, podnebje in naravne vire.
The scheme is intended to promote those products which have a high level of environmental performance through the use of the EU Ecolabel.
Namen sistema je z uporabo znaka EU za okolje podpirati tiste proizvode, ki imajo visoko raven okoljske uspešnosti.
To this effect, it is appropriate to require that the criteria with which products must comply in order to bear the EU Ecolabel be based on the best environmental performance achieved by products on the Community market.
Zato je ustrezno zahtevati, da merila, ki jih morajo proizvodi izpolnjevati, če želijo nositi znak EU za okolje, temeljijo na najboljši okoljski uspešnosti, ki so jo proizvodi dosegli na trgu Skupnosti.
Those criteria should be simple to understand and to use and should be based on scientific evidence, taking into consideration the latest technological developments.
Navedena merila bi morala biti enostavna za razumevanje in uporabo ter bi morala temeljiti na znanstvenih dokazih, ki upoštevajo zadnje tehnološke dosežke.
Those criteria should be market oriented and limited to the most significant environmental impacts of products during their whole life cycle.
Ta merila bi morala biti tržno usmerjena ter omejena samo na najpomembnejše vplive proizvodov na okolje med njihovim celotnim življenjskim krogom.
In order to avoid the proliferation of environmental labelling schemes and to encourage higher environmental performance in all sectors for which environmental impact is a factor in consumer choice, the possibility of using the EU Ecolabel should be extended.
Da bi se izognili prevelikemu številu sistemov za okoljsko označevanje in spodbudili večjo okoljsko uspešnost v vseh sektorjih, v katerih potrošniki pri svoji izbiri upoštevajo vpliv na okolje, bi bilo treba razširiti možnost uporabe znaka EU za okolje.
However, for food and feed product groups, a study should be undertaken to ensure that criteria are feasible and that added value can be guaranteed.
Vendar bi bilo treba za skupine prehrambenih in krmnih proizvodov opraviti študijo, da se zagotovijo izvedljiva merila in dodana vrednost.
For food and feed products, as well as unprocessed agricultural products that lie within the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products [6], the option that only those products certified as organic would be eligible for award of the EU Ecolabel should be considered, to avoid confusion for consumers.
Da bi se izognili zmedi pri potrošnikih, bi bilo treba pri hrani in krmi ter nepredelanih kmetijskih proizvodih v okviru Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 834/2007 z dne 28. junija 2007 o ekološki pridelavi in označevanju ekoloških proizvodov [6] upoštevati možnost, da bi se znak EU za okolje podelil le proizvodom, potrjenim kot ekološki.
The EU Ecolabel should aim at substituting hazardous substances by safer substances, wherever technically possible.
Cilj znaka EU za okolje bi moral biti nadomestitev nevarnih snovi z varnejšimi snovmi, kadar koli je to tehnično mogoče.
For the acceptance by the general public of the EU Ecolabel scheme, it is essential that environmental non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and consumer organisations play an important role and be actively involved in the development and setting of EU Ecolabel criteria.
Bistvenega pomena za to, da javnost sprejme sistem za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje, je, da imajo okoljske nevladne organizacije (NVO) in potrošniške organizacije pomembno vlogo pri oblikovanju in določanju meril za podeljevanje znakov EU za okolje ter so dejavno vključene v ta proces.
It is desirable that any interested party may lead the development or revision of EU Ecolabel criteria provided that common procedural rules are followed and that the process is coordinated by the Commission.
Zaželeno je, da oblikovanje ali pregled meril za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje vodi katera koli zainteresirana stran, če so upoštevana vsa skupna postopkovna pravila in postopek usklajuje Komisija.
In order to ensure the overall coherence of the Community's action, it is also appropriate to require that the latest strategic objectives of the Community in the field of the environment, such as Environment Action Programmes, Sustainable Development Strategies and Climate Change Programmes, be taken into account in the development or revision of EU Ecolabel criteria.
Da bi zagotovili splošno skladnost ukrepa Skupnosti je tudi ustrezno zahtevati, da se pri oblikovanju in reviziji meril za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje upoštevajo najnovejši strateški cilji Skupnosti na področju okolja, kot so okoljski akcijski programi, strategije trajnostnega razvoja in programi o podnebnih spremembah.
In order to simplify the EU Ecolabel scheme and to reduce the administrative burden associated with the use of the EU Ecolabel, the assessment and verification procedures should be streamlined.
Da bi poenostavili sistem za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje in zmanjšali upravno breme, povezano z uporabo znaka EU za okolje, bi bilo treba postopke ocenjevanja in preverjanja racionalizirati.
It is appropriate to provide for the conditions under which the EU Ecolabel may be used and, in order to ensure compliance with those conditions, to require competent bodies to undertake verifications and to prohibit the use of the EU Ecolabel where the conditions for use have not been complied with.
Ustrezno je zagotoviti pogoje, pod katerimi se znak EU za okolje lahko uporablja, da bi se zagotovila skladnost z navedenimi pogoji, od pristojnih organov zahtevati, da opravijo preverjanja, in prepovedati uporabo znaka EU za okolje, kadar pogoji za uporabo niso izpolnjeni.
It is also appropriate to require Member States to lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and to ensure that they are implemented.
Prav tako je ustrezno zahtevati, da države članice predpišejo pravila o kaznih, ki se uporabljajo v primeru kršitve te uredbe, in zagotovijo njihovo izvajanje.
In order to increase the use of the EU Ecolabel and in order to encourage those whose products meet the EU Ecolabel criteria, the costs of using the EU Ecolabel should be reduced.
Da bi povečali uporabo znaka EU za okolje in spodbudili tiste, katerih proizvodi izpolnjujejo merila za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje, bi bilo treba zmanjšati stroške njegove uporabe.
It is necessary to inform the public and to raise public awareness of the EU Ecolabel through promotion actions, information and education campaigns, at local, national and Community levels, in order to make consumers aware of the meaning of the EU Ecolabel and to enable them to make informed choices.
S promocijskimi ukrepi, informativnimi in izobraževalnimi kampanjami na lokalni in nacionalni ravni ter na ravni Skupnosti je treba seznanjati javnost ter povečati njeno ozaveščenost o znaku EU za okolje, da bi se potrošniki začeli zavedati pomena znaka za okolje in da bi lahko sprejemali premišljene odločitve.
It is also necessary in order to make the scheme more attractive to producers and retailers.
To je potrebno tudi zato, da bo sistem bolj privlačen za proizvajalce in trgovce na drobno.
Member States should consider guidelines when they establish their national Green Public Procurement Action Plans and could consider the setting of targets for public purchasing of environmental friendly products.
Države članice bi morale pri oblikovanju akcijskih načrtov za zelena javna naročila upoštevati smernice in razmisliti o določitvi ciljev za javni nakup okolju prijaznih proizvodov.
In order to facilitate the marketing of products bearing environmental labels at national and Community levels, to limit additional work for companies, in particular SMEs, and to avoid confusing consumers, it is also necessary to enhance the coherence and promote harmonisation between the EU Ecolabel scheme and national ecolabelling schemes in the Community.
Da bi olajšali trženje proizvodov z znakom za okolje na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti, podjetjem, zlasti malim in srednje velikim podjetjem (MSP), omejili dodatno delo ter se izognili zmedi pri potrošnikih, je treba tudi povečati skladnost in spodbujati usklajevanje med sistemom za podeljevanje znaka EU za okolje in nacionalnimi sistemi za podeljevanje znaka za okolje v Skupnosti.
In order to ensure a harmonised application of the awarding system and of the market surveillance and control of the use of the EU Ecolabel throughout the Community, competent bodies should exchange information and experiences.
Da bi zagotovili usklajeno uporabo sistema podeljevanja ter nadzora trga in uporabe znaka EU za okolje v vsej Skupnosti, bi si morali pristojni organi izmenjavati informacije in izkušnje.
In particular, the Commission should be empowered to adopt the criteria with which products must comply in order to bear the EU Ecolabel and to amend the Annexes to this Regulation.
Zlasti bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti pooblastila za sprejemanje meril, ki jih morajo proizvodi izpolnjevati, da bi lahko prejeli znak EU za okolje, in za spreminjanje prilog k tej uredbi.
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation, inter alia by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Ker so navedeni ukrepi splošnega obsega in so namenjeni spreminjanju nebistvenih določb te uredbe, med drugim z njenim dopolnjevanjem z novimi nebistvenimi določbami, jih je treba sprejeti v skladu z regulativnim postopkom s pregledom iz člena 5a Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
For reasons of clarity and legal certainty, Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 should therefore be replaced by this Regulation.
Zaradi jasnosti in pravne varnosti bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 1980/2000 nadomestiti s to uredbo.