natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Several parties also claimed that the real cause of the alleged injury of the Union industry was the imports from other third countries, the decrease in demand, the increased raw material prices and the lack of proper access to these raw materials, wrong strategic decisions taken by the Union industry, the competitive pressure in their downstream market, the decrease in the production of the product concerned destined for captive use, the general change in market conditions and the competitive situation in the Union market.
Več strani je tudi trdilo, da je bil resničen vzrok za domnevno škodo industrije Unije uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav, zmanjšanje povpraševanja, zvišanje cen surovin in pomanjkanje ustreznega dostopa do teh surovin, napačne strateške odločitve, ki jih je sprejela industrija Unije, konkurenčni pritisk na prodajnem trgu, zmanjšanje proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka za lastno uporabo, splošne spremembe tržnih pogojev in konkurenčne razmere na trgu Unije.
It is worth mentioning that the above parties were not able to substantiate their claims and to demonstrate that factors other than the low-priced dumped imports from the countries concerned were breaking the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports.
Omeniti je treba, da navedene strani niso mogle utemeljiti svojih trditev in dokazati, da so razen nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav še drugi dejavniki, ki lahko pretrgajo zvezo med škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in dampinškim uvozom.
Some parties claimed that the Commission did not analyse the possible impact the sales of branched FOH had on the sales of the product concerned made by the Union industry and the effects it had on its economic situation.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da Komisija ni analizirala morebitnega vpliva, ki ga je imela prodaja maščobnih alkoholov, sestavljenih iz razvejenih izomerov, in njihovih mešanic na prodajo zadevnega izdelka industrije Unije, ter njenih učinkov na gospodarski položaj industrije.
The investigation focused on the product as defined in recitals 8 to 12 and no party provided reliable data which would have allowed to assess the possible negative impact the branched FOH had on the economic situation of the Union industry.
Preiskava se je osredotočila na izdelek, kot je opredeljen v uvodnih izjavah 8 do 12, nobena stran pa ni zagotovila zanesljivih podatkov, ki bi omogočili oceno morebitnega negativnega vpliva maščobnih alkoholov, sestavljenih iz razvejenih izomerov, in njihovih mešanic na gospodarski položaj industrije Unije.
Hence this claim is rejected.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
In the absence of any comments regarding effects of other factors, recitals 99 to 106 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z učinki drugih dejavnikov ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 99 do 106 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The investigation did not point to the fact that there were factors other than the low-priced dumped imports from the countries concerned which were breaking the causal link between the material injury suffered by the Union industry and the dumped imports.
Preiskava ni izpostavila dejstva, da so razen nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav še drugi dejavniki, ki lahko pretrgajo vzročno zvezo med znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in dampinškim uvozom.
In the absence of any comments regarding conclusion on causation, recitals 107 to 110 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s sklepno ugotovitvijo o vzročni zvezi ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 107 do 110 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the interest of the Union industry, recitals 112 and 113 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z interesom industrije Unije ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 112 in 113 začasne uredbe potrdita.
In the absence of comments on the interest of importers, recitals 115 and 116 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z interesom uvoznikov ni bilo pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 115 in 116 začasne uredbe potrdita.
It is recalled that in order to assess the possible impact of the anti-dumping measures on the Union users the investigation concentrated mainly on the aggregated data provided by five large user companies visited at provisional stage.
Spomniti je treba, da se je preiskava zaradi ocene morebitnega vpliva protidampinških ukrepov na uporabnike Unije osredotočila zlasti na skupne podatke, ki jih je predložilo pet velikih družb uporabnic, obiskanih v začasni fazi.
On that basis it was provisionally found that the share of the cost of the product concerned in the total cost of production for this group was significant and ranged between 10 % and 20 % depending on the final product.
Na podlagi tega je bilo začasno ugotovljeno, da je bil delež stroškov zadevnega izdelka v skupnih stroških proizvodnje za to skupino velik, pri čemer se je gibal med 10 % in 20 %, odvisno od končnega izdelka.
However, the data available was revised and according to new calculations and the correction of some figures, this range is found to be between 15 % and 25 %.
Vendar so se razpoložljivi podatki ponovno preučili, pri čemer je bilo na podlagi novih izračunov in popravkov nekaterih številk ugotovljeno, da se ta delež giblje med 15 % in 25 %.
Similarly, the average profit margin in the business using the product concerned was found to be around 6 % for the group of the five visited companies; the new calculations show a higher average profit margin, which is about 7,5 %.
Podobno je bilo ugotovljeno, da povprečna stopnja dobička pri poslovanju z zadevnim izdelkom za skupino petih obiskanih družb znaša približno 6 %; na podlagi novih izračunov pa je bila ugotovljena višja povprečna stopnja dobička, tj. približno 7,5 %.
Finally, the average share of business using the product concerned out of the total business was also corrected.
Nenazadnje se je popravil tudi delež skupnega poslovanja, ki predstavlja povprečni delež poslovanja z zadevnim izdelkom.
This was provisionally found to be about 22 %, whereas according to new calculations, a percentage of 25 % was found.
Ta je bil začasno določen na približno 22 %, medtem ko je bil na podlagi novih izračunov ugotovljen 25-odstotni delež.
After the publication of the provisional Regulation, a number of users reacted and made comments with regard to the final disclosure.
Po objavi začasne uredbe so se odzvali številni uporabniki in predložili pripombe v zvezi z dokončnim razkritjem.
They contested the selection of the five user companies mentioned in recital 118 of the provisional Regulation arguing that the data used to assess the possible impact of the measures on the user industry was not transparent, not based on representative parties and on a low number of parties.
Nasprotovali so izboru petih družb uporabnic iz uvodne izjave 118 začasne uredbe, pri čemer so trdili, da podatki, ki so se uporabili pri oceni morebitnega vpliva ukrepov na predelovalno industrijo, niso bili pregledni in niso temeljili na reprezentativnih straneh, ampak na majhnem številu strani.
It was argued that the analysis should take into consideration the data provided by all cooperating users in the investigation.
Trdili so, da bi bilo treba pri analizi upoštevati podatke, ki bi jih predložili vsi v preiskavi sodelujoči uporabniki.
However, as mentioned in recitals 117 and 118 of the provisional Regulation the 21 cooperating companies represent together around 25 % of total Union purchases of the product concerned during the IP, whilst the five companies used to assess the interest of users represented about 18 % of these purchases, and 72 % of the cooperating users’ purchases of the product concerned.
Vendar, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 117 in 118 začasne uredbe, 21 sodelujočih družb skupaj predstavlja približno 25 % vseh nakupov zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v OP, medtem ko je pet družb, ki so se uporabile pri oceni interesa uporabnikov, predstavljalo približno 18 % teh nakupov, tj. 72 % nakupov zadevnega izdelka s strani sodelujočih uporabnikov.
Besides being representative in terms of volume of purchase of the product concerned, theses five users constituted a very good representation of the different business sectors of the users industry.
Poleg tega, da je bilo teh pet uporabnikov reprezentativnih z vidika obsega nakupa zadevnega izdelka, so sestavljali zelo dobro ponazoritev različnih poslovnih sektorjev predelovalne industrije.
Indeed, the five visited companies are a heterogeneous group that includes not only the first-use producers, i.e. the surfactants producers, but also the users of the surfactants and further downstream users.
Pet obiskanih družb resnično oblikuje heterogeno skupino, ki ne vključuje le proizvajalcev za prvo uporabo, tj. proizvajalcev površinsko aktivnih snovi, ampak tudi uporabnike površinsko aktivnih snovi in uporabnike v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu.
Nevertheless, a wider analysis taking into account all information submitted by the cooperating users was carried out.
Kljub temu je bila izvedena širša analiza, pri kateri so se upoštevale vse informacije, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči uporabniki.
In particular, a specific assessment of the possible impact of anti-dumping duties on the surfactants producers as a separate group was performed since this group could potentially be most affected by the imposition of measures.
Pri tem je bila izvedena posebna ocena morebitnega vpliva protidampinških dajatev na proizvajalce površinsko aktivnih snovi kot ločeno skupino, ker bi lahko uvedba ukrepov najbolj vplivala na to skupino.
Another separate analysis has been performed for a second group of users, consisting of all other user companies that cooperated in the investigation.
Druga ločena analiza je bila izvedena za drugo skupino uporabnikov, ki je zajemala vse ostale družbe uporabnice, ki so sodelovale v preiskavi.
A simulation assessing the possible effect of an average duty of 5 % on imports of FOH on all cooperating users first and then on the two separate groups was performed.
Izvedena je bila simulacija, pri kateri se je najprej ocenil morebitni učinek povprečne 5-odstotne dajatve na uvoz maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic na vse sodelujoče uporabnike in potem na dve ločeni skupini.
The outcome of the simulation showed that the final impact of this average duty on the total cost of production for the business using the product concerned would be of about 0,09 % for all users, while the impact of the same duty on the downstream product using the product concerned, for the surfactants’ group would be of about 0,05 % and on the second group of companies it would be about 0,29 %.
Rezultati simulacije so pokazali, da bi končni učinek te povprečne dajatve na skupne stroške proizvodnje pri poslovanju z zadevnim izdelkom znašal približno 0,09 % za vse uporabnike, medtem ko bi učinek iste dajatve na izdelek v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu, pri katerem se uporablja zadevni izdelek, za proizvajalce površinsko aktivnih snovi znašal približno 0,05 %, za drugo skupino družb pa približno 0,29 %.
The analysis showed as well that the surfactants producers achieved lower profit margins in the sectors using the product under investigation; however, this group imported from the countries concerned only about 2,6 % of their total purchases of the product under investigation during the IP.
Analiza je prav tako pokazala, da so proizvajalci površinsko aktivnih snovi v sektorjih, ki uporabljajo izdelek v preiskavi, dosegali nižje stopnje dobička; vendar je ta skupina v OP uvažala iz zadevnih držav le 2,6 % vseh svojih nakupov izdelka v preiskavi.
Furthermore, the percentage of the surfactants business using FOH in comparison to their total turnover is about 24 %.
Odstotek poslovanja s površinsko aktivnimi snovmi, pri katerem se uporabljajo maščobni alkoholi in njihove mešanice, v primerjavi s celotnim prihodkom od prodaje znaša približno 24 %.
Hence, even with the application of an average dumping duty of 5 %, the final impact on the cost of production of products including the product investigated is very limited and even negligible on their total profitability.
Zato je kljub uporabi povprečne 5-odstotne dampinške dajatve končni učinek na stroške proizvodnje izdelkov, ki vključujejo izdelek v preiskavi, zelo omejen in v zvezi s skupno dobičkonosnostjo celo zanemarljiv.
Some surfactant producers nevertheless argued that the anti-dumping duties will prevent them from freely buying their raw materials, thus creating a distortion in their market segment.
Kljub temu so nekateri proizvajalci površinsko aktivnih snovi trdili, da jim bodo protidampinške dajatve preprečile prosto nakupovanje surovin in tako povzročile izkrivljanje v njihovem tržnem segmentu.
As stated in recital 120 of the provisional Regulation, the level of anti-dumping duties and the possible impact on the user industry and on the downstream market, do not create serious barriers to imports of the product concerned.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 120 začasne uredbe, stopnja protidampinških dajatev ter morebitni učinek na predelovalno industrijo in prodajni trg ne predstavljata resnih ovir za uvoz zadevnega izdelka.
The investigation confirmed that the definitive anti-dumping duties could not create a distortion on the downstream market.
Preiskava je potrdila, da dokončne protidampinške dajatve ne morejo povzročiti izkrivljanja na prodajnem trgu.
At the same time, it should not be difficult for surfactant producers to pass on this rather low increase in cost in the final price of their products.
Hkrati proizvajalci površinsko aktivnih snovi ne bi smeli imeti težav pri prenosu tega razmeroma majhnega zvišanja stroškov na končno ceno svojih izdelkov.
Therefore, the claims that the anti-dumping duties would create distortions in the downstream market are rejected.
Zato se trditve, da bi protidampinške dajatve povzročile izkrivljanje na prodajnem trgu, zavrnejo.
After disclosure of definitive findings some users insisted that the Union producers had refused to supply goods to them, and that there were few alternatives of supply.
Po razkritju dokončnih ugotovitev so nekateri uporabniki vztrajali, da so jim proizvajalci Unije zavrnili dobavo blaga in da je drugih možnosti dobave malo.
However, as stated in recital 120 of the provisional Regulation, the relatively low level of proposed measures should not preclude the possibility to import the product concerned.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 120 začasne uredbe, relativno nizka stopnja predlaganih ukrepov ne izključuje možnosti uvoza zadevnega izdelka.
Furthermore, the Union producers did not produce at full capacity during the period considered.
Poleg tega proizvajalci Unije v obravnavanem obdobju niso proizvajali ob polni zmogljivosti.
In addition, imports are also possible from other third countries which are not subject to measures and the Eurostat figures for imports of FOH from the rest of the world after the IP show that these imports are growing, indicating that the alleged risk of lack of supply is unsubstantiated.
Uvoz je mogoč tudi iz drugih tretjih držav, za katere se ne uporabljajo ukrepi, Eurostatovi podatki za uvoz maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic iz drugih držav po OP pa kažejo, da se takšen uvoz narašča, kar kaže na neutemeljenost domnevnega tveganja pomanjkanja dobave.
Therefore, this claim was rejected.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
Some users’ associations which failed to make themselves known in the deadline foreseen under point 5.3 of the notice of initiation claimed that their views, especially on the possible impact of the measures on small and medium enterprises and on specific sectors, had not been reflected in the assessment of the Union interest.
Nekatera združenja uporabnikov, ki se niso javila v roku iz točke 5.3 obvestila o začetku, so trdila, da njihova stališča, zlasti glede morebitnega vpliva ukrepov na mala in srednje velika podjetja ter na posebne sektorje, niso bila upoštevana v oceni interesa Unije.
However, it should be noted that all the comments raised by these associations have been taken into consideration in this investigation.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da so bile v tej preiskavi upoštevane vse pripombe teh združenj.
Furthermore, as stated in recital 109, the assessment of the Union interest has taken into account all information submitted by the cooperating users.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 109 so bile v oceni interesa Unije upoštevane tudi vse informacije, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči uporabniki.
Therefore, this claim has been rejected.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
Several parties claimed that the duration of the measures, were these to be imposed, should be limited to a maximum period of 2 years.
Več strani je trdilo, da je treba v primeru uvedbe ukrepov njihovo trajanje omejiti na največ dve leti.
According to the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping measure shall normally be imposed for the duration of 5 years.
Glede na osnovno uredbo je dokončni protidampinški ukrep običajno uveden za pet let.
Since none of the parties demonstrated that a period of 2 years would be sufficient to counteract the dumping causing injury as demanded in Article 11(1) of the basic Regulation, there seems to be no valid reason to deviate form the standard duration of the length of the measures.
Ker nobena stran ni dokazala, da bi obdobje dveh let zadostovalo za izravnavo dampinga, ki povzroča škodo, kot je določeno v členu 11(1) osnovne uredbe, ni utemeljenega razloga za spremembo običajnega trajanja ukrepov.
In the absence of any other comments on the interest of users, it is confirmed that the imposition of definitive measures on imports of the product concerned would not be against the Union interest, recitals 117 to 121 of the provisional Regulation are thus confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z interesom uporabnikov ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se potrdi, da uvedba dokončnih ukrepov za uvoz zadevnega izdelka ne bi bila v nasprotju z interesom Unije, in uvodne izjave 117 do 121 se zato potrdijo.
Based on the above the conclusion reached in recital 122 of the provisional Regulation can be confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se lahko potrdi sklepna ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 122 začasne uredbe.
There are no compelling reasons against the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of FOH from the countries concerned.
Ugotovljeni niso bili nobeni utemeljeni razlogi, ki bi nasprotovali uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic iz zadevnih držav.
It is recalled that the profit margin used to calculate the target profit at provisional stage was 7,7 %.
Spomniti je treba, da je stopnja dobička, ki se je uporabila za izračun ciljnega dobička v začasni fazi, znašala 7,7 %.
The complainants have argued that a target profit of 15 % would be more appropriate.
Pritožniki so trdili, da bi bil ustreznejši 15-odstotni ciljni dobiček.
In this respect, it should be noted that they failed to submit verifiable evidence to support the claim that the target profit was too low.
V zvezi s tem je treba navesti, da niso predložili preverljivih dokazov, ki bi podprli trditev, da je bil ciljni dobiček prenizek.
Therefore, it is proposed to confirm the provisional target profit of 7,7 % which is based on the profit margin achieved for the whole alcohol business of the one complainant in its last profitable year before the surge of low-priced dumped imports.
Zato se predlaga potrditev 7,7-odstotnega ciljnega dobička, ki temelji na doseženi stopnji dobička za celotno poslovanje z alkoholom enega pritožnika v njegovem zadnjem dobičkonosnem letu pred povečanjem nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza.
Certain parties claimed that 7,7 % was not realistic and was too high.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da stopnja 7,7 % ni realna in je previsoka.
They suggested using a lower profit margin between 3 and 5 % to establish the injury elimination level.
Za določitev stopnje odprave škode so predlagale uporabo nižje stopnje dobička, tj. med 3 in 5 %.
This claim however was not substantiated by any evidence showing that the profit proposed was the one that could be achieved by the Union industry in the absence of dumped imports in the Union market and was thus not accepted.
Vendar ta trditev ni bila utemeljena z nobenimi dokazi o tem, da je predlagani dobiček tisti dobiček, ki bi ga industrija Unije lahko dosegla brez dampinškega uvoza na trgu Unije, zato ni bila sprejeta.
Certain parties have claimed that the Commission erroneously established the injury elimination level on the basis of the underselling margin, whereas it should have used the undercutting margin.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je Komisija napačno določila stopnjo odprave škode na podlagi stopnje nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen, pri čemer bi morala uporabiti stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
In the present case, it was not considered that the undercutting margin was an appropriate basis to establish the injury elimination level for the Union industry as it would not reflect the level of price that could be obtained in the absence of dumped imports in the Union market.
V tem primeru se stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen ni obravnavala kot primerna podlaga za določitev stopnje odprave škode za industrijo Unije, ker ne bi izražala ravni cene, ki bi se lahko dosegla brez dampinškega uvoza na trgu Unije.
On this basis, the provisional injury margins expressed as a percentage of the cif Union frontier price, duty unpaid as indicated in recital 127 of the provisional Regulation can be confirmed.
Na podlagi tega se lahko začasne stopnje škode, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 127 začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
As mentioned in recitals 79 to 84, some parties claimed, inter alia, that the current measures should be suspended because post-IP events concerning the price increase of the product concerned in the Union market were manifest, undisputed and lasting.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 79 do 84, so določene strani med drugim trdile, da je treba trenutne ukrepe opustiti, ker so bili dogodki po OP glede povečanja cen zadevnega izdelka na trgu Unije jasni, nesporni in trajni.
They also argued that any definitive measures should not take the form of an ad valorem duty but rather imposed in the form of an MIP.
Trdile so tudi, da dokončni ukrepi ne bi smeli biti uvedeni v obliki dajatev ad valorem, temveč v obliki minimalne uvozne cene.
It is considered however that in this particular case the circumstances are not such as to warrant the imposition of a minimum import price.
Vendar se šteje, da v tem primeru okoliščine ne utemeljujejo uvedbe minimalne uvozne cene.
This form of the measure could easily be circumvented given the nature of the product concerned and the complex corporate structures of the exporters in question.
Glede na naravo zadevnega izdelka in zapletene korporativne strukture zadevnih izvoznikov se je takšni obliki ukrepa mogoče enostavno izogniti.
However, it is admitted that there is certain price sensitivity in the market for the product at issue and thus it would be reasonable to minimise the impact of the definitive measures on Union users in the event of possible significant price increases of the product concerned.
Vendar se priznava, da na trgu obstaja določena občutljivost cen za zadevni izdelek in bi bilo zato razumno čim bolj zmanjšati vpliv dokončnih ukrepov na uporabnike Unije v primeru morebitnih znatnih povečanj cen zadevnega izdelka.
Hence, it is considered appropriate to change the form of the definitive measures from ad valorem duties to specific duties.
Zato je obliko dokončnih ukrepov primerno spremeniti iz dajatev ad valorem na posebne dajatve.
This form of measures is expected to limit to a certain extent any possible undue negative impact on the users in the case prices would increase significantly and rapidly.
Pričakuje se, da bodo takšni ukrepi do določene mere omejili morebiten negativen vpliv na uporabnike, če bi se cene znatno in hitro povečale.
If, on the other hand, prices would decrease, the specific duties would still ensure sufficient protection to the Union producers.
Če pa bi se cene zmanjšale, bi posebne dajatve še vedno zagotavljale zadostno zaščito proizvajalcem Unije.