natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is recommended that in the absence of an international agreement by the European Union for mutual assistance cooperation arrangements [26] with a third country, any bilateral assistance agreement with a given third country should provide for adequate data protection safeguards and be notified to the relevant data protection supervisory authorities so that prior checking may be carried out, unless the Commission has found that the third country ensures an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from the Union in accordance with Article 25 of the Data Protection Directive.
Ker Evropska unija nima mednarodnega sporazuma za ureditev sodelovanja glede vzajemne pomoči [26] s tretjo državo, se priporoča, da vsak dvostranski sporazum o pomoči z dano tretjo državo določa ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za varstvo podatkov, zadevni nacionalni organi za nadzor varstva podatkov pa morajo biti obveščeni, da se lahko izvede predhodno preverjanje, razen če Komisija meni, da tretja država v skladu s členom 25 Direktive o varstvu podatkov zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov pri prenosih iz Unije.
Article 2(a).
Člen 2(a).
It should be noted that data protection principles apply to both data stored electronically and data stored in hardcopy.
Treba je opozoriti, da se načela varstva podatkov uporabljajo za elektronsko shranjene podatke in podatke v papirni obliki.
For specific rules on deletion see: Decision 2007/76/EC and ‘The Consumer Protection Cooperation Network: Operating Guidelines’.
Za posebna pravila glede izbrisa glej: Odločba 2007/76/ES in „Mreža sodelovanja na področju varstva potrošnikov: smernice za delovanje“.
Directive 95/46/EC.
Direktiva 95/46/ES.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001.
Articles 8, 9, and 15 of CPC Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
Členi 8, 9 in 15 Uredbe SVP (ES) št. 2006/2004.
Article 8(5) of CPC Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
Člen 8(5) Uredbe SVP (ES) št. 2006/2004.
Article 9 of CPC Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
Člen 9 Uredbe SVP (ES) št. 2006/2004.
Article 11(2) and 13 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člen 11(2) in člen 13 Direktive 95/46/ES.
Article 10 and 11 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člena 10 in 11 Direktive 95/46/ES.
Article 7 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člen 7 Direktive 95/46/ES.
Article 6(1)(b) of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člen 6(1)(b) Direktive 95/46/ES.
Article 10, 11, 12 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Členi 10, 11 in 12 Direktive 95/46/ES.
Article 12 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člen 12 Direktive 95/46/ES.
Article 8(2) of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člen 8(2) Direktive 95/46/ES.
Article 8 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člen 8 Direktive 95/46/ES.
Chapter 4 of the Annex to Decision 2007/76/EC.
Poglavje 4 Priloge k Odločbi 2007/76/ES.
Opinion 6/2007/EC on data protection issues related to the Consumer Protection Cooperation System (CPCS) 01910/2007/EN — WP 130 — adopted on 21 September 2007, p. 24-26.
Mnenje 6/2007 o vprašanjih varstva podatkov v zvezi s sistemom sodelovanja za varstvo potrošnikov (SSVP) 01910/2007/EN – WP 130 – sprejeto 21. septembra 2007, str. 24–26.
Article 6(1)(d) of Directive 95/46/EC.
Člen 6(1)(d) Direktive 95/46/ES.
Decision 2007/76/EC.
Odločba 2007/76/ES.
The Consumer Protection Cooperation Network: Operating Guidelines — endorsed by the CPC Committee on 8 June 2010.
Mreža sodelovanja na področju varstva potrošnikov: smernice za delovanje – potrdil Odbor SVP 8. junija 2010.
The content of these guidelines will be integrated into future trainings on the CPCS.
Vsebina teh smernic bo vključena v prihodnje usposabljanje o SSVP.
Article 10 of the CPC Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Chapter 2 of the Annex to the CPC Implementing Decision 2007/76/EC.
Člen 10 Uredbe SVP (ES) št. 2006/2004 in poglavje 2 Priloge k Odločbi 2007/76/ES o izvajanju SVP.
Article 14(2) of CPC Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
Člen 14(2) Uredbe SVP (ES) št. 2006/2004.
Article 18 of CPC Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
Člen 18 Uredbe SVP (ES) št. 2006/2004.
WHO IS WHO IN THE CPCS?
KDO JE KDO V SISTEMU SSVP?
Data protection compliance in the CPCS does not need to be unduly complicated or pose an excessive administrative burden.
Skladnost z zahtevami o varstvu podatkov v sistemu SSVP ne sme biti neupravičeno zapletena ali povzročati čezmerne upravne obremenitve.
The CPCS uses s-TESTA which stands for secured Trans European Services for Telematics between Administrations. It offers a managed, reliable and secure pan-European communication platform for European and National administrations.
Uporabniki SSVP uporabljajo s-TESTA (varne čezevropske telematske storitve med upravami), ki omogočajo vodeno, zanesljivo in varno vseevropsko komunikacijsko platformo za evropske in nacionalne uprave.
However, the Commission also has access to the alerts, feedback information and other case related information [7]. The purpose of the Commission’s access is to monitor the application of the CPC Regulation as well as the consumer protection legislation listed in the Annex to the CPC Regulation and to compile statistical information in connection with carrying out these duties.
Vendar ima Komisija dostop tudi do opozoril, povratnih informacij in drugih informacij v zvezi s primerom [7].
on the authorisation for the placing in service of structural subsystems and vehicles under Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o dovoljenju za začetek obratovanja strukturnih podsistemov in vozil v skladu z Direktivo 2008/57/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community [1], and in particular Article 30(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2008/57/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o interoperabilnosti železniškega sistema v Skupnosti [1] ter zlasti člena 30(1) Direktive,
Since 2005, the European Railway Agency (hereinafter ‘the Agency’) has been carrying out several activities supporting the development of an integrated, safe and interoperable EU railway system.
(1) Evropska železniška agencija (v nadaljevanju: Agencija) od leta 2005 izvaja različne dejavnosti, ki podpirajo razvoj celovitega, varnega in interoperabilnega železniškega sistema v EU.
Following the adoption of Directive 2008/57/EC, the Agency has had regular meetings with stakeholders and National Safety Authorities (NSA), particularly in the field of cross-acceptance of railway vehicles.
Agencija se je po sprejetju Direktive 2008/57/ES redno sestajala z zainteresiranimi stranmi in nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi (NVO), zlasti na področju vzajemnega priznavanja železniških vozil.
These meetings have shown that there are different understandings of the authorisation for placing in service structural subsystems and vehicles as provided for Chapters IV and V respectively of that Directive.
Na teh sestankih se je pokazalo, da obstajajo različna pojmovanja dovoljenja za začetek obratovanja strukturnih podsistemov in vozil iz poglavij IV in V te direktive.
There is a significant risk that without a common understanding, national implementing rules may lead to diverging applications of the requirements between Member States and therefore increased difficulties for manufacturers and railway undertakings.
Brez skupnega razumevanja obstaja veliko tveganje, da bodo nacionalna izvedbena pravila povzročila različno izvajanje zahtev v državah članicah ter tako povečala težave za proizvajalce in prevoznike v železniškem prometu.
A common understanding of these processes is also needed in order to ensure consistency between the various recommendations to be produced by the Agency in relation to several tasks mandated by Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive) [2] and Directive 2008/57/EC.
Skupno razumevanje teh procesov je potrebno tudi za zagotovitev usklajenosti različnih priporočil, ki jih bo pripravila Agencija v zvezi z različnimi nalogami, predpisanimi v skladu z Direktivo 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o varnosti na železnicah Skupnosti ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 95/18/ES o izdaji licence prevoznikom v železniškem prometu in Direktive 2001/14/ES o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti, naložitvi uporabnin za uporabo železniške infrastrukture in podeljevanju varnostnega spričevala (Direktiva o varnosti na železnici) [2] ter v skladu z Direktivo 2008/57/ES.
When checking the implementation of Directive 2008/57/EC by Member States the principles and interpretations set out in this Recommendation will be taken into account where appropriate.
Pri preverjanju izvajanja Direktive 2008/57/ES v državah članicah se bodo, kjer je to ustrezno, upoštevala načela in razlage iz tega priporočila.
The Committee referred to in Article 29 of Directive 2008/57/EC has been consulted on this measure,
V zvezi s tem ukrepom je bilo izvedeno posvetovanje z odborom iz člena 29 Direktive 2008/57/ES –
When authorising the placing in service of structural subsystems and vehicles, Member States should ensure that the principles and directions set out in the Annex are taken into account.
Države članice morajo pri dovoljevanju začetka obratovanja strukturnih podsistemov in vozil zagotoviti, da se upoštevajo načela in smernice iz priloge.
one single authorisation for the placing in service of vehicles should be sufficient for the whole EU rail network when the conditions specified in Directive 2008/57/EC and in Annex are met.
Če so izpolnjeni pogoji, določeni v Direktivi 2008/57/ES in v Prilogi, naj bi eno dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja vozil zadostovalo za celotno železniško omrežje v EU.
This is the case, for example, when a TSI conform vehicle is running only on a TSI conform network;
To na primer velja, če vozilo, skladno s TSI, obratuje le v omrežju, ki je skladno s TSI.
the procedures for authorising vehicles are harmonised and include some clear steps with a fixed time limits to be taken by the competent authorities;
Postopki izdajanja dovoljenj za vozila so usklajeni in vključujejo nekatere jasne ukrepe, ki jih morajo pristojni organi izvesti v določenem roku.
the applicable technical rules for granting authorisations for placing in service of structural subsystems or vehicles should be stable, transparent, non-discriminatory and as far as possible harmonised; the rules should be either TSIs, or, when permitted by Directive 2008/57/EC, national rules notified to the Commission and made available through a database set up by the Commission.
Veljavni tehnični predpisi za odobritev dovoljenj za začetek obratovanja strukturnih podsistemov ali vozil morajo biti stabilni, pregledni, nediskriminatorni in čim bolj usklajeni; predpisi morajo vključevati TSI ali, če tako dovoljuje Direktiva 2008/57/ES, nacionalne predpise, ki so bili priglašeni Komisiji in so na voljo v bazi podatkov, ki jo je oblikovala Komisija.
From the moment a TSI is adopted, Member States should not adopt any national rule related to products or subsystem parts covered by that TSI (except for those declared as ‘open points’ and ‘specific cases’ where the TSI so provides, and where applicable, derogations);
Ko je TSI sprejeta, države članice ne smejo več sprejemati nacionalnih predpisov v zvezi s proizvodi ali deli podsistema, ki so zajeti v zadevni TSI (razen za tiste, ki so navedeni kot „odprte točke“ in „posebni primeri“, če je tako določeno v TSI, ter, kadar je ustrezno, za odstopanja).
in the case of non-TSI conform vehicles, the principle of mutual recognition should be applied as far as possible in order to prevent unnecessary requirements and redundant verifications, unless these are strictly necessary for verifying the technical compatibility of the vehicle with the relevant network;
Če vozila niso skladna s TSI, je treba, če je mogoče, uporabljati načelo vzajemnega priznavanja, da se preprečijo nepotrebne zahteve in odvečna preverjanja, razen če so ta nujno potrebna za preverjanje tehnične združljivosti vozila z ustreznim omrežjem.
the process of authorisation for placing in service of structural subsystems or vehicles and the operation and maintenance of those subsystems or vehicles are two clearly distinct processes regulated by distinct provisions and carried out by different bodies;
Postopek izdaje dovoljenja za začetek obratovanja strukturnih podsistemov ali vozil ter upravljanje in vzdrževanje teh podsistemov ali vozil sta dva jasno ločena postopka, ki ju urejajo različne določbe in izvajajo različni organi.
technical compatibility at the interface between network and vehicles is crucial for safety.
Tehnična združljivost vmesnika med omrežjem in vozili je bistvena za varnost.
Although the safety aspect of such interface could be proven through the use of reference systems or explicit risk estimations in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 [3], it is necessary, for interoperability reasons, that technical compatibility is proven on the basis of a rule-based approach (that is the use of codes of practice in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 352/2009), including harmonised Union rules such as TSIs or ENs, or, where such rules do not yet exist, on the basis of notified national rules;
Čeprav je mogoče varnostni vidik takega vmesnika dokazati na podlagi uporabe referenčnih sistemov ali izrecnih ocen tveganja v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 352/2009 [3], je treba tehnično združljivost za namene interoperabilnosti dokazati na podlagi pristopa, ki temelji na predpisih (to je uporabe kodeksa praks v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 352/2009), ki vključujejo usklajene predpise Unije, kot so TSI ali EN, ali, če taki predpisi še ne obstajajo, na podlagi priglašenih nacionalnih predpisov.
for placing in service a vehicle, safe integration includes two aspects: safe integration between the vehicle’s relevant subsystems (only in the case of the first authorisation) and safe integration between the vehicle and the network concerned.
Za začetek obratovanja vozila varna vključitev obsega dva vidika: varno vključitev ustreznih podsistemov vozila (le v primeru prvega dovoljenja) in varno vključitev vozila v zadevno omrežje.
Where the interface between a vehicle and a network is covered by either a TSI requirement or a national rule, the applicant considers it as a code of practice.
Če je vmesnik med vozilom in omrežjem vključen v zahtevo TSI ali nacionalni predpis, ga prosilec obravnava kot kodeks prakse.
In that case the hazard(s) for which requirements have been identified in such TSI or national rule are considered as checked through the fulfilment of the requirements of either the TSI or the national rule.
V tem primeru se tveganje(-ja), v zvezi s katerim(-rimi) so bile določene zahteve v taki TSI ali takem nacionalnem predpisu, šteje(-jo) za preverjeno(-na) na podlagi izpolnjevanja zahtev bodisi TSI bodisi nacionalnega predpisa.
This means that if the requirements of the TSI or the national rule cover the essential requirement of safety (i.e. all relevant hazards), the safe integration is demonstrated through the implementation of the TSI or the national rule.
Če torej zahteve TSI ali nacionalni predpis vključujejo bistveno zahtevo glede varnosti (tj. vsa pomembna tveganja), se varna vključitev ugotovi na podlagi izvajanja TSI ali nacionalnega predpisa.
If there are hazards for which requirements are not covered in the TSI or in national rules this indicates that the TSI or national rules do not fully meet the essential requirements.
Če obstajajo tveganja, za katera zahteve niso vključene v TSI ali nacionalne predpise, to pomeni, da TSI ali nacionalni predpisi ne izpolnjujejo bistvenih zahtev v celoti.
In that case the deficiency must be addressed in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2008/57/EC.
V tem primeru je treba pomanjkljivost obravnavati v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 2008/57/ES.
These missing requirements should be considered in future revisions of TSIs in order to achieve a full coverage of the interoperable interfaces by TSIs progressively.
Te manjkajoče zahteve je treba obravnavati v prihodnjih pregledih TSI, da se postopno doseže celotna pokritost interoperabilnih vmesnikov v TSI.
In the meantime the risks are managed by the applicant by comparison with a reference system or an explicit risk analysis in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 352/2009.
Do takrat pa tveganja upravlja prosilec s primerjavo z referenčnim sistemom ali izrecno analizo tveganja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 352/2009.
For the sake of interoperability, it is necessary that technical compatibility and safe integration between vehicle and network are demonstrated on a rule based approach.
Za namene interoperabilnosti morata biti tehnična združljivost vozila z omrežjem in varna vključitev vozila v omrežje ugotovljeni na podlagi pristopa, ki temelji na predpisih.
To that end, the TSI should exhaustively cover both aspects;
V ta namen mora TSI natančno obravnavati oba vidika.
if the TSI includes a specification for compatibility between vehicles, that specification is verified as part of the EC verification procedure.
Če TSI vključuje specifikacijo v zvezi z združljivostjo vozil, se ta specifikacija preverja v skladu s postopkom ES-verifikacije.
However there is no evidence to suggest that interoperability requires every rail vehicle to have the same coupling;
Vendar ni dokazano, da mora biti za dosego interoperabilnosti vsako železniško vozilo enako speto.
in the case of additional authorisations, Member States should not call into question the national rules covering the open points not related to technical compatibility between the vehicle and the network;
Države članice v primeru dodatnih dovoljenj ne smejo izpodbijati nacionalnih predpisov, ki zajemajo odprte točke, ki niso povezane s tehnično združljivostjo vozila z omrežjem.
Directive 2004/49/EC makes each of the infrastructure managers and of the railway undertakings responsible for their parts of the system.
Direktiva 2004/49/ES določa, da je vsak upravljavec infrastrukture in vsak prevoznik v železniškem prometu odgovoren za svoje dele sistema.
The railway undertaking is solely responsible for safe operation of its trains.
Prevoznik v železniškem prometu je odgovoren le za varno upravljanje svojih vlakov.
The infrastructure manager’s role is confined to the management of the infrastructure and therefore the infrastructure manager has no responsibility for the operation of trains other than to issue movement authority.
Vloga upravljavca infrastrukture je omejena na upravljanje infrastrukture, zato ni odgovoren za upravljanje vlakov, ampak le za izdajo dovoljenja za vožnjo.
The infrastructure manager has no permissioning role;
Upravljavec infrastrukture ni pristojen za izdajo dovoljenj.
in the case of urgent measures that Member States may consider imposing as a consequence of accidents or incidents, Member States should take care to recognise that the safety management system of the railway undertaking is the primary mechanism for management of new risks to the operation of vehicles that may have been discovered in the course of accident/incident investigations or findings in the context of supervision.
Če morda države članice razmišljajo o uvedbi nujnih ukrepov zaradi nesreč ali izrednih dogodkov, morajo upoštevati, da je sistem varnega upravljanja prevoznika v železniškem prometu temeljni mehanizem za upravljanje novih tveganj glede upravljanja vozil, ki so se morda pokazala pri preiskavi nesreč/izrednih dogodkov ali pri ugotovitvah v okviru nadzora.
Even if a Member State believes that a new rule for authorisation for placing in service is urgently required, it has to follow the procedures specified in applicable Union legislation, including notification of the draft new rule to the Commission under Directives 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] or 2004/49/EC.
Tudi če država članica meni, da je za dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja novi predpis nujen, mora upoštevati postopke, navedene v veljavni zakonodaji Unije, vključno s priglasitvijo osnutka novega predpisa Komisiji v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES [4] ali 2004/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Interoperability constituents, subsystems and vehicles
Komponente interoperabilnosti, podsistemi in vozila
Interoperability constituents and subsystems
Komponente interoperabilnosti in podsistemi
Requirements to be met when manufacturing a subsystem
Zahteve, ki morajo biti izpolnjene pri proizvodnji podsistema
Types of requirements
Vrste zahtev
Essential requirements of Directive 2008/57/EC
Bistvene zahteve Direktive 2008/57/ES
Technical specifications for interoperability (TSI)
Tehnične specifikacije za interoperabilnost (TSI)
Harmonised standards (ENs)
Usklajeni standardi (EN)
Evolution of interoperability
Razvoj interoperabilnosti
Verifications that ICs and subsystems have been built in accordance with the applicable requirements
Preverjanje, ali so bili KI in podsistemi zgrajeni v skladu z veljavnimi zahtevami
Assessment of the conformity or suitability for use of interoperability constituents (ICs)
Ocena skladnosti ali primernosti za uporabo komponent interoperabilnosti (KI)
Verification procedure for subsystems
Postopek verifikacije za podsisteme
‘EC’ verification procedure for subsystems
Postopek ES-verifikacije za podsisteme
Verification procedure of subsystems in the case of national rules
Postopek verifikacije podsistemov v primeru nacionalnih predpisov
Declaration drawn up by the applicant
Izjava, ki jo sestavi prosilec
What is authorisation for placing in service?
Kaj je dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja?
Concept
Koncept
Authorisation for the placing in service of subsystems
Dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja podsistemov
The border between the authorisation for placing in service and the operation and maintenance of subsystems and vehicles
Meja med dovoljenjem za začetek obratovanja ter upravljanjem in vzdrževanjem podsistemov in vozil
Operational and maintenance requirements to be verified before the authorisation for placing in service
Zahteve glede upravljanja in vzdrževanja, ki jih je treba preveriti pred izdajo dovoljenja za začetek obratovanja
Safety Management Systems (SMSs)
Sistemi varnega upravljanja (SVU)
Technical compatibility, safe integration and compatibility between vehicles
Tehnična združljivost, varna vključitev in združljivost vozil
Safe integration
Varna vključitev
Compatibility between vehicles
Združljivost vozil
Authorisations in the case of TSI conform and non-TSI conform vehicles
Dovoljenja v primeru vozil, ki so skladna s TSI, in vozil, ki niso skladna s TSI
Authorisation of TSI conform vehicles
Dovoljenje za vozila, ki so skladna s TSI
Authorisation of non-TSI conform vehicles
Dovoljenje za vozila, ki niso skladna s TSI
Vehicle type authorisation
Odobritev tipa vozila
Authorisations for vehicles running on TEN and off TEN
Dovoljenja za vozila, ki vozijo v TEN in zunaj TEN
Authorisations for vehicles coming from third countries
Dovoljenja za vozila, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav
Process to be followed after authorisation
Postopek po izdaji dovoljenja
Forming a train
Sestava vlaka
Ascertaining route compatibility
Ugotavljanje združljivosti proge
Obtaining the path (allocating capacity)
Pridobitev poti (dodelitev zmogljivosti)
Modifications in a subsystem or vehicle that is already authorised
Spremembe podsistema ali vozila, ki je že odobreno
Procedure to be followed
Postopek, ki ga je treba izvajati
Link between specific cases, derogations and partial application of TSIs in the case of renewal/upgrading
Povezava med posebnimi primeri, odstopanji in delno uporabo TSI v primeru obnove/nadgradnje
Applicant for the authorisation for placing in service
Prosilec za dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja
Railway Undertaking (RU)
Prevoznik v železniškem prometu (PŽP)
Infrastructure Manager (IM)
Upravljavec infrastrukture (UI)
Entity in Charge of Maintenance (ECM)
Subjekt, odgovoren za vzdrževanje (SOV)
Notified Body (NoBo)
Priglašeni organ (PriglO)
Designated Body (DeBo)
Pristojni organ (PristO)
National Safety Authority (NSA)
Nacionalni varnostni organ (NVO)
Member State (MS)
Država članica (DČ)