natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [1], and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [1] in zlasti četrtega pododstavka člena 6(1) Direktive,
Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 [2] and (EC) No 1490/2002 [3] lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second and third stages of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and establish a list of active substances to be assessed, with a view to their possible inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 451/2000 [2] in (ES) št. 1490/2002 [3] določata podrobna pravila za izvajanje druge in tretje faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in seznam aktivnih snovi, ki jih je treba oceniti zaradi njihove možne vključitve v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
That list included methyl bromide.
Navedeni seznam vključuje metil bromid.
In accordance with Article 11f of Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 and Article 12(1)(a) and Article 12(2)(b) of that Regulation Commission Decision 2008/753/EC of 18 September 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of methyl bromide in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance [4] was adopted.
V skladu s členom 11(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 1490/2002 ter členom 12(1)(a) in členom 12(2)(b) navedene uredbe je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/753/ES z dne 18. septembra 2008 o nevključitvi metil bromida v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov [4].
In agreement with the original notifier, another person (hereinafter ‘the applicant’) submitted a new application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC requesting the accelerated procedure to be applied, as provided for in Articles 14 to 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5].
Druga oseba (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vlagatelj) je v dogovoru s prvotnim prijaviteljem v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS vložila nov zahtevek za uporabo pospešenega postopka iz členov 14 do 19 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [5].
The application was submitted to the United Kingdom, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002.
Zahtevek je bil predložen Združenemu kraljestvu, ki je bilo z Uredbo (ES) št. 1490/2002 imenovano za državo članico poročevalko.
The specification of the active substance and the supported uses are the same as were the subject of Decision 2008/753/EC.
Specifikacija aktivne snovi in podprte uporabe so enake kot v Odločbi 2008/753/ES.
That application also complies with the remaining substantive and procedural requirements of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
Navedeni zahtevek je tudi v skladu z ostalimi vsebinskimi in postopkovnimi zahtevami iz člena 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008.
It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 26 November 2009.
Navedeno poročilo je 26. novembra 2009 predložilo Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in Komisiji.
The Authority communicated the additional report to the other Member States and the applicant for comments and forwarded the comments it had received to the Commission.
Agencija je dodatno poročilo poslala v pripombe drugim državam članicam in vlagatelju ter Komisiji posredovala prejete pripombe.
In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on methyl bromide to the Commission on 3 November 2010 [6].
V skladu s členom 20(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in na zahtevo Komisije je Agencija 3. novembra 2010 [6] Komisiji predložila svoje sklepe o metil bromidu.
The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and the Animal Health and finalised on 28 January 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for methyl bromide.
Osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatno poročilo in sklep Agencije so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 28. januarja 2011 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede metil bromida.
The additional report by the rapporteur Member State and the conclusion by the Authority concentrate on the concerns that lead to the non-inclusion.
Dodatno poročilo države članice poročevalke in sklep Agencije vsebujeta pomisleke, ki so razlog za nevključitev.
Those concerns were harmful effects on human health in particular on bystanders, because the exposure was greater than 100 % of the AOEL, and on consumers, because the exposure was greater than 100 % of the ADI and the ARfD.
Navedeni pomisleki zadevajo škodljive učinke na zdravje ljudi, zlasti na navzoče osebe, ker je bila izpostavljenost višja od 100 % AOEL, ter na potrošnike, ker je bila izpostavljenost višja od 100 % ADI in ARfD.
More concerns were identified in the review report for methyl bromide.
Dodatni pomisleki so bili izraženi v poročilu o pregledu glede metil bromida.
Additional information was submitted by the applicant, in particular as regards reducing exposure by applying a recapture technology.
Vlagatelj je predložil dodatne informacije, zlasti o zmanjšanju izpostavljenosti z uporabo tehnologije ponovnega zajetja.
In order to reduce the risk to consumers and non-target species, the applicant has limited its support to uses on wood packaging material in containers.
Da bi se zmanjšalo tveganje za potrošnike in neciljne vrste, je vlagatelj omejil podporo uporabam na leseni material za pakiranje v zabojnikih.
However, the additional information provided by the applicant did not permit to eliminate all of the specific concerns arising in respect of methyl bromide.
Vendar dodatne informacije, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, niso odpravile vseh posebnih pomislekov glede metil bromida.
In particular, the information available was not sufficient to conduct a quantitative exposure assessment for bystanders.
Razpoložljive informacije zlasti niso bile zadostne za količinsko oceno izpostavljenosti navzočih oseb.
Furthermore, the information available was insufficient to estimate the possible air concentrations of methyl bromide around containers with wood packaging material on which methyl bromide was used and to finalise the risk assessment for non-target organisms.
Poleg tega razpoložljive informacije niso omogočile ocene vsebnosti metil bromida v zraku okrog zabojnikov z lesenim materialom za pakiranje, na katerih se je uporabljal metil bromid, ter dokončanje ocene tveganja za neciljne organizme.
In addition, data were not available to address the risk of indirect exposure of soil, surface water and groundwater.
Prav tako ni bilo podatkov za oceno posredne izpostavljenosti zemlje, površinskih voda in podtalnice.
The Commission invited the applicant to submit its comments on the conclusion by the Authority.
Komisija je vlagatelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k sklepu Agencije.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) to Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the applicant to submit comments on the draft review report.
Poleg tega je Komisija vlagatelja v skladu s členom 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k osnutku poročila o pregledu.
The applicant submitted its comments, which have been carefully examined.
Vlagatelj je predložil pripombe, ki so bile natančno pregledane.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the applicant, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the expert meetings of the Authority have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing methyl bromide satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov Agencije, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo metil bromid, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2008/753/EC should be repealed.
Odločbo 2008/753/ES je treba razveljaviti.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of a further application for methyl bromide pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na ponovno vložitev zahtevka za metil bromid v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in poglavjem II Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008.
Methyl bromide shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Metil bromid se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2008/753/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2008/753/ES se razveljavi.
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance methyl bromide.
[6] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo metil bromid.
[32 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1893.
[32 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1893.
Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal
Na voljo na spletu: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.
setting the European Union-wide performance targets and alert thresholds for the provision of air navigation services for the years 2012 to 2014
o vzpostavitvi vseevropskih ciljev uspešnosti in mejnih vrednosti opozarjanja za izvajanje navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa med letoma 2012 in 2014
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) [1], and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 549/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2004 o določitvi okvira za oblikovanje enotnega evropskega neba (okvirna uredba) [1] in zlasti člena 11(1) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 of 29 July 2010 laying down a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions and amending Regulation (EC) No 2096/2005 laying down common requirements for the provision of air navigation services [2] provides for the adoption by the Commission of European Union-wide performance targets.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 691/2010 z dne 29. julija 2010 o določitvi načrta izvedbe za navigacijske službe zračnega prometa in funkcije omrežja ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2096/2005 o skupnih zahtevah za izvajanje navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa [2] določa, da Komisija sprejme vseevropske cilje uspešnosti.
The Commission held on 27 May 2010 a consultation on the approach and processes for setting European Union-wide performance targets, associating all stakeholders listed in Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004.
Komisija je dne 27. maja 2010 izvedla posvetovanje o pristopu in postopkih za vzpostavitev vseevropskih ciljev uspešnosti, ki je povezalo vse zainteresirane strani, navedene v členu 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 549/2004.
A Performance Review Body was designated on 29 July 2010 by the Commission further to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 to assist it in the implementation of the performance scheme.
Komisija je organ za oceno uspešnosti imenovala dne 29. julija 2010 v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 691/2010, da bi ji pomagal pri izvajanju načrta izvedbe.
The Performance Review Body prepared European Union-wide performance targets proposals in collaboration with EASA, which were submitted on 2 August 2010 for stakeholder consultation as required by Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.
Organ za oceno uspešnosti je v sodelovanju z EASA pripravil predloge za vseevropske cilje uspešnosti, ki so bili 2. avgusta 2010 predloženi v posvetovanje zainteresiranim stranem v skladu s členom 9(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 691/2010.
The Performance Review Body’s proposed EU-wide performance targets for environment, capacity and cost-efficiency have been checked with EASA for consistency with the overriding safety objectives.
Skladnost s prevladujočimi varnostnimi cilji predlogov organa za oceno uspešnosti za vseevropske cilje uspešnosti za okolje, zmogljivost in stroškovno učinkovitost je bila preverjena pri EASA.
The Performance Review Body delivered on 27 September 2010 to the Commission its recommendations for European Union-wide performance targets for the period 2012-2014 in a report substantiating each of the recommendations with a description of the assumptions and rationale used for setting up the targets and containing in annexes a consultation document summarising the consultation process as well as a comments response document outlining how comments were taken into account in the preparation of the recommendations to the Commission.
Organ za oceno uspešnosti je 27. septembra 2010 Komisiji predložil svoja priporočila za vseevropske cilje uspešnosti za obdobje 2012–2014 v poročilu, ki vsako priporočilo podpre z opisom predpostavk in razmišljanjem, uporabljenim za določitev ciljev ter v prilogah vsebuje posvetovalni dokument, ki povzema postopke posvetovanja kot tudi dokument z odgovori na pripombe, opisujoč kako so bile pripombe upoštevane pri pripravi priporočil Komisiji.
The European Air Traffic Management Master Plan, a living document which constitutes the commonly agreed roadmap covering both the development and the deployment of SESAR, has been endorsed by the Council on 30 March 2009 [4].
Osrednji načrt za upravljanje zračnega prometa v Evropi, ki se lahko posodablja in sestavlja skupno dogovorjeni načrt, ki pokriva tako razvoj kot izvajanje SESAR, je Svet potrdil 30. marca 2009 [4].
It contains the political vision and high-level goal of the Commission for the Single European Sky and its technological pillar in the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency, and the setting of the European Union-wide performance targets should be considered part of a process aiming at achieving these goals.
Vsebuje politično vizijo in poglavitni cilj Komisije za enotno evropsko nebo in njegov tehnološki steber za ključna področja uspešnosti glede varnosti, okolja, zmogljivosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti; vzpostavitev vseevropskih ciljev uspešnosti mora biti videna kot del postopka, ki stremi k doseganju teh ciljev.
During the first reference period for the performance scheme the Commission, advised by EASA, should assess and validate the safety key performance indicators, with a view to ensuring that the safety risk is adequately identified, mitigated and managed.
V prvem referenčnem obdobju za načrt izvedbe mora Komisija, ki ji svetuje EASA, oceniti in potrditi ključne kazalnike uspešnosti varnosti z namenom zagotoviti, da je varnostno tveganje ustrezno opredeljeno, zmanjšano in upravljano.
Member States should monitor and publish these key performance indicators and may set corresponding targets.
Države članice morajo spremljati in objavljati ključne kazalnike uspešnosti in lahko določajo ustrezne cilje.
In application of recital 18, Articles 10 and 13, Annex II, point 1.2 and Annex III, point 1 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010, the national or functional airspace block performance targets need not necessarily be equal to the European Union-wide performance targets; they should be consistent with these European Union-wide performance targets.
V skladu z uvodno izjavo 18, s členoma 10 in 13, s točko 1.2 Priloge II in točko 1 Priloge III Uredbe (EU) št. 691/2010 ni nujno potrebno, da so nacionalni cilji uspešnosti ali cilji uspešnosti funkcionalnega bloka zračnega prostora enaki vseevropskim ciljem uspešnosti; morajo pa biti skladni s temi vseevropskimi cilji uspešnosti.
The national or functional airspace block performance plans should reflect this consistency.
Nacionalni načrti izvedbe ali načrti izvedbe funkcionalnega bloka zračnega prostora morajo to skladnost odražati.
The assessment made by the Commission of the national or functional airspace block performance plans and targets should be global, weighting each target against the others in a balanced way, considering justified trade-offs between different performance areas, having regard to the overriding safety objectives.
Ocena nacionalnih načrtov izvedbe ali načrtov izvedbe funkcionalnega bloka zračnega prostora s strani Komisije mora biti celostna, na uravnotežen način upoštevati razmerje vsakega cilja v odnosu do drugih, upoštevajoč upravičene kompromise med različnimi področji uspešnosti z ozirom na prevladujoče varnostne cilje.
It should take into account local context, in particular for States with low unit rates or under the ‘European Support Mechanism’, such as cost containment measures already undertaken, planned costs for specific programmes to gain performance improvements in dedicated performance fields, and specificities including achievements as well as failures.
Upoštevati mora lokalne razmere, še zlasti za države z nizkimi cenami enot ali v „evropskem mehanizmu podpore“, kot so že izvedeni ukrepi za omejevanje stroškov, načrtovani stroški za posebne programe, da bi pridobili izboljšave uspešnosti na določenih področjih uspešnosti in posebnosti, vključujoč tako dosežke kot tudi neuspehe.
In application of Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010, it should take appropriate account of the evolution of the context that may have occurred between the date of adoption of the European Union-wide targets and the date of the assessment.
V skladu s členom 13(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 691/2010 mora ustrezno upoštevati razvoj razmer, do katerega je lahko prišlo med datumom sprejetja vseevropskih ciljev in datumom ocene.
The assessment should also take into account the progress already made by Member States since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] in the various key performance areas and in particular the cost-efficiency area.
Ocena mora upoštevati tudi že dosežen napredek držav članic od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 1070/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5] na različnih ključnih področjih uspešnosti in še zlasti na področju stroškovne učinkovitosti.
In application of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1794/2006, Member States should be allowed to carry-over the profits or losses that they have incurred up to the year 2011 included.
V skladu z določbami Uredbe (ES) št. 1794/2006 je državam članicam dovoljeno prenesti dobičke ali izgube, ki so jih ustvarile do vključno leta 2011.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Single Sky Committee,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za enotno evropsko nebo –
For the performance reference period starting on 1 January 2012 and ending on 31 December 2014, the European Union-wide performance targets shall be as follows:
Za referenčno obdobje uspešnosti, ki se začne 1. januarja 2012 in konča 31. decembra 2014, so vseevropski cilji uspešnosti naslednji:
environment target an improvement by 0,75 of a percentage point of the average horizontal en route flight efficiency indicator in 2014 as compared to the situation in 2009;
okoljski cilj izboljšanje kazalnika povprečne horizontalne preletne učinkovitosti letov za 0,75-odstotne točke v letu 2014 v primerjavi s stanjem v letu 2009;
capacity target an improvement of the average en route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay so as to reach a maximum of 0,5 minute per flight in 2014;
cilj zmogljivosti izboljšanje povprečne preletne zamude upravljanja pretoka zračnega prometa (ATFM) tako, da bi bila največ 0,5 minute na polet v letu 2014;
cost-efficiency target a reduction of the average European Union-wide determined unit rate for en route air navigation services from 59,97 EUR in 2011 to 53,92 EUR in 2014 (expressed in real terms, EUR 2009), with intermediate annual values of 57,88 EUR in 2012 and 55,87 EUR in 2013.
cilj stroškovne učinkovitosti znižanje povprečne vseevropsko določene cene enote za preletne navigacijske službe zračnega prometa z 59,97 EUR v letu 2011 na 53,92 EUR v letu 2014 (izraženo v realni vrednosti v EUR v letu 2009), z vmesnima letnima vrednostma 57,88 EUR v letu 2012 in 55,87 EUR v letu 2013.
Alert thresholds
Mejne vrednosti opozarjanja
For all key performance indicators applicable to the performance reference period, the alert threshold beyond which the alert mechanism referred to in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 may be activated shall be a deviation over a calendar year by at least 10 % of the actual traffic recorded by the Performance Review Body versus the traffic forecasts referred to in Article 3.
Za vse ključne kazalnike uspešnosti, ki se nanašajo na referenčno obdobje uspešnosti, je mejna vrednost opozarjanja, po prekoračitvi katere je mogoče aktivirati mehanizem opozarjanja iz člena 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 691/2010, enaka odstopanju znotraj koledarskega leta v višini najmanj 10 % dejanskega prometa, ki ga je zabeležil organ za oceno uspešnosti, v primerjavi z napovedmi prometa iz člena 3.
For the cost-efficiency indicator, the costs evolution alert threshold beyond which the alert mechanism referred to in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010 may be activated shall be a deviation over a calendar year by at least 10 % of the actual costs at European Union-wide level recorded by the Performance Review Body versus the reference determined costs referred to in Article 3.
Za kazalnik stroškovne učinkovitosti je mejna vrednost opozarjanja za gibanje stroškov, po prekoračitvi katere je mogoče aktivirati mehanizem opozarjanja iz člena 18 Uredbe (EU) št. 691/2010, enaka odstopanju znotraj koledarskega leta v višini najmanj 10 % dejanskih stroškov na vseevropski ravni, ki ga je zabeležil organ za oceno uspešnosti, v primerjavi z ustreznimi določenimi stroški iz člena 3.
Assumptions
Predpostavke
Articles 1 and 2 of this Decision are based on the following assumptions:
Člena 1 in 2 tega sklepa temeljita na naslednjih predpostavkah:
traffic forecasted at European Union-wide level, expressed in en route service units: 108776000 in 2012, 111605000 in 2013 and 114610000 in 2014;
Predviden promet na vseevropski ravni, izražen v enotah preletnih storitev: 108776000 v letu 2012, 111605000 v letu 2013 in 114610000 v letu 2014.
reference determined costs forecasted at European Union-wide level (expressed in real terms, EUR 2009): 6296000000 in 2012, 6234000000 in 2013 and 6179000000 in 2014.
Ustrezni določeni stroški, predvideni na vseevropski ravni (izraženo v realni vrednosti v EUR v letu 2009): 6296000000 v letu 2012, 6234000000 v letu 2013 in 6179000000 v letu 2014.
Revision of the European Union-wide targets
Revizija vseevropskih ciljev
In accordance with Article 16(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010, the Commission shall decide to revise the EU-wide targets set out in Article 1 if, before the beginning of the reference period, it has substantial evidence that the initial data, assumptions and/or rationales used for setting the initial EU-wide targets are no longer valid.
V skladu s členom 16(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 691/2010 se Komisija odloči za revizijo vseevropskih ciljev iz člena 1, če ima pred začetkom referenčnega obdobja trdne dokaze, da prvotni podatki, domneve in/ali razlogi, uporabljeni za vzpostavitev prvotnih vseevropskih ciljev, niso več veljavni.