natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 11 May 2011 [2] that Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625, under the proposed conditions of use, does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment, and that this additive has the potential to improve the growth performance in weaned piglets.
(4) Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“) je v mnenju z dne 11. maja 2011 [2] navedla, da Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625 v predlaganih pogojih uporabe nima škodljivega vpliva na zdravje živali in ljudi ali okolje ter da bi ta dodatek lahko izboljšal rast odstavljenih pujskov.
The assessment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625 shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied.
Ocena Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625 je pokazala, da so pogoji za dovoljenje iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 izpolnjeni.
Done at Brussels, 24 October 2011.
V Bruslju, 24. oktobra 2011
EFSA Journal 2011; 9 (5):2173.
EFSA Journal 2011; 9(5):2173.
represented by RM Associates Ltd
A.S., ki ga zastopa RM Associates Ltd
Preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625 containing a minimum of 1 x 1010 CFU/g additive
pripravek Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625, ki vsebuje najmanj 1 x 1010 CFU/g dodatka
Method of analysis [1]Enumeration: pour plate method using yeast extract dextrose chloramphenicol (CGYE) agar (EN 15789)
Analitska metoda [1]metoda štetja: metoda razlitja na plošči z uporabo agarja iz ekstrakta kvasovk, dekstroze in kloramfenikola (CGYE) (EN 15789)
Identification: polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
identifikacija: verižna reakcija s polimerazo (PCR)
Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the Reference Laboratory: http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EURLs/EURL_feed_additives/Pages/index.asp
Podrobnosti o analitskih metodah so na voljo na naslednjem naslovu referenčnega laboratorija: http://irmm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EURLs/EURL_feed_additives/Pages/index.aspx.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1075/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1075/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 October 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 25. oktobra 2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1076/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1076/2011
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1070/2011 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1070/2011 [4].
OJ L 277, 22.10.2011, p. 16.
UL L 277, 22.10.2011, str. 16.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 25 October 2011
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 25. oktobra 2011
Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1077/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice
o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za operativno upravljanje obsežnih informacijskih sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article 74, Article 77(2)(a) and (b), Article 78(2)(e), Article 79(2)(c), Article 82(1)(d), Article 85(1), Article 87(2)(a) and Article 88(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 74, člena 77(2)(a) in (b), člena 78(2)(e), člena 79(2)(c), člena 82(1)(d), člena 85(1), člena 87(2)(a) in člena 88(2) Pogodbe,
The second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) was established by Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [2] and by Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [3].
Druga generacija schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) je bila vzpostavljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [2] ter Sklepom Sveta 2007/533/PNZ z dne 12. junija 2007 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [3].
Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and Decision 2007/533/JHA provide that the Commission is to be responsible, during a transitional period, for the operational management of Central SIS II.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 1987/2006 in Sklepu 2007/533/PNZ je določeno, da je za operativno upravljanje centralnega SIS II v prehodnem obdobju odgovorna Komisija.
After that transitional period, a Management Authority is to be responsible for the operational management of Central SIS II and certain aspects of the communication infrastructure.
Po tem prehodnem obdobju bo za operativno upravljanje centralnega SIS II in nekatere vidike komunikacijske infrastrukture odgovoren organ za upravljanje.
The Visa Information System (VIS) was established by Council Decision 2004/512/EC of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS) [4].
Vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS) je bil vzpostavljen z Odločbo Sveta 2004/512/ES z dne 8. junija 2004 o vzpostavitvi vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) [4].
Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 concerning the Visa Information System (VIS) and the exchange of data between Member States on short-stay visas (VIS Regulation) [5] provides that the Commission is to be responsible, during a transitional period, for the operational management of the VIS.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 767/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o vizumskem informacijskem sistemu (VIS) in izmenjavi podatkov med državami članicami o vizumih za kratkoročno prebivanje (Uredba VIS) [5] je določeno, da je v prehodnem obdobju za operativno upravljanje VIS odgovorna Komisija.
After that transitional period, a Management Authority is to be responsible for the operational management of the Central VIS and of the national interfaces and for certain aspects of the communication infrastructure.
Po tem prehodnem obdobju bo za operativno upravljanje VIS, nacionalnih vmesnikov in nekatere vidike komunikacijske infrastrukture odgovoren organ za upravljanje.
Eurodac was established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of ‘Eurodac’ for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention [6].
Eurodac je bil vzpostavljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2725/2000 z dne 11. decembra 2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema „Eurodac“ za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije [6].
Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2002 [7] lays down necessary implementing rules.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 407/2002 [7] določa potrebna izvedbena pravila.
It is necessary to establish a Management Authority in order to ensure the operational management of SIS II, VIS and Eurodac and of certain aspects of the communication infrastructure after the transitional period, and potentially that of other large-scale information technology (IT) systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, subject to the adoption of separate legislative instruments.
Treba je ustanoviti organ za upravljanje, da bi po prehodnem obdobju zagotovili operativno upravljanje SIS II, VIS in Eurodac ter nekaterih vidikov komunikacijske infrastrukture in morda tudi operativno upravljanje drugih obsežnih informacijskih (IT) sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice, za kar je treba sprejeti posebne zakonodajne instrumente.
With a view to achieving synergies, it is necessary to provide for the operational management of those large-scale IT systems in a single entity, benefiting from economies of scale, creating critical mass and ensuring the highest possible utilisation rate of capital and human resources.
Da bi ustvarili sinergijo, mora za operativno upravljanje teh obsežnih IT sistemov skrbeti en subjekt, s čimer bi izkoristili ekonomijo obsega, ustvarili kritično maso in zagotovili največji možni izkoristek kapitala in človeških virov.
In the joint statements accompanying the SIS II and VIS legislative instruments, the European Parliament and the Council invited the Commission to present, following an impact assessment, the necessary legislative proposals entrusting an agency with the long-term operational management of Central SIS II and of certain aspects of the communication infrastructure, and of the VIS.
V skupnih izjavah, priloženih zakonodajnim instrumentom o SIS II in VIS, sta Evropski parlament in Svet pozvala Komisijo, naj po opravljeni oceni učinka predloži potrebne zakonodajne predloge, zato da se dolgoročno operativno upravljanje SIS II in nekaterih vidikov komunikacijske infrastrukture ter VIS poveri agenciji.
Since the Management Authority should have legal, administrative and financial autonomy it should be established in the form of a regulatory agency (Agency) having legal personality.
Ker bi moral biti organ za upravljanje pravno, upravno in finančno neodvisen, bi ga bilo treba ustanoviti kot regulativno agencijo („agencija“), ki je pravna oseba.
As was agreed, the seat of the Agency should be in Tallinn (Estonia).
Kot je bilo dogovorjeno, bi moral biti sedež agencije v Talinu (Estonija).
However, since the tasks relating to technical development and the preparation for the operational management of SIS II and VIS are carried out in Strasbourg (France) and a backup site for those IT systems has been installed in Sankt Johann im Pongau (Austria), this should continue to be the case.
Ker pa se naloge, povezane s tehničnim razvojem in pripravami na operativno upravljanje SIS II in VIS, opravljajo v Strasbourgu (Francija) in ker je bil podporni center za te IT sisteme vzpostavljen v Sankt Johannu im Pongau (Avstrija), bi to moralo ostati nespremenjeno.
Those two sites should also be the locations, respectively, where the tasks relating to technical development and operational management of Eurodac should be carried out and where a backup site for Eurodac should be established.
Na teh dveh lokacijah bi morali tudi izvajati naloge, povezane s tehničnim razvojem in operativnim upravljanjem Eurodac, in vzpostaviti podporni center za Eurodac.
Those two sites should also be the locations, respectively, for the technical development and operational management of other large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice, and, if so provided in the relevant legislative instrument, for a backup site capable of ensuring the operation of a large-scale IT system in the event of failure of that system.
To bi moralo veljati tudi za tehnični razvoj in operativno upravljanje drugih obsežnih IT sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter, če je tako določeno v zadevnem zakonodajnem instrumentu, podpornega centra, ki lahko zagotovi delovanje obsežnega IT sistema v primeru odpovedi tega sistema.
Consequently, the tasks of the Management Authority set out in Regulations (EC) No 1987/2006 and (EC) No 767/2008 should be exercised by the Agency.
Naloge organa za upravljanje, določene v uredbah (ES) št. 1987/2006 in (ES) št. 767/2008, bi morala zato opravljati agencija.
Those tasks include further technical development.
Te naloge vključujejo nadaljnji tehnični razvoj.
In accordance with Regulations (EC) No 2725/2000 and (EC) No 407/2002, a central Unit has been established within the Commission which is responsible for the operation of the central database of Eurodac and other tasks relating to it.
V skladu z uredbama (ES) št. 2725/2000 in (ES) št. 407/2002 je bila v okviru Komisije vzpostavljena centralna enota, odgovorna za upravljanje osrednje zbirke podatkov Eurodac in druge naloge v zvezi s tem.
In order to exploit synergies, the Agency should take over the Commission’s tasks relating to the operational management of Eurodac including certain tasks relating to the communication infrastructure as from the date on which the Agency takes up its responsibilities.
Da bi izkoristili sinergije, bi morala agencija z dnem, ko začne opravljati svoje naloge, prevzeti naloge Komisije, povezane z operativnim upravljanjem sistema Eurodac, vključno z nekaterimi nalogami v zvezi s komunikacijsko infrastrukturo.
The core function of the Agency should be to fulfil the operational management tasks for SIS II, VIS and Eurodac and, if so decided, other large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice.
Glavna naloga agencije bi moralo biti operativno upravljanje SIS II, VIS in Eurodac in, če bo tako odločeno, drugih obsežnih IT sistemov s področja svobode varnosti in pravice.
The Agency should also be responsible for technical measures required by the tasks entrusted to it, which are not of a normative nature.
Agencija bi morala biti odgovorna tudi za tehnične ukrepe, povezane s poverjenimi nalogami, ki niso normativnega značaja.
Those responsibilities should be without prejudice to the normative tasks reserved to the Commission alone or to the Commission assisted by a Committee in the respective legislative instruments governing the systems operationally managed by the Agency.
Pri tem ne bi smela posegati v tiste normativne naloge, za katere je izključno pristojna Komisija oziroma pri katerih Komisiji pomaga odbor v skladu s posameznimi zakonodajnimi instrumenti o sistemih, ki jih operativno upravlja agencija.
In addition, the Agency should perfom tasks relating to training on the technical use of SIS II, VIS and Eurodac and other large-scale IT systems which might be entrusted to it in the future.
Poleg tega bi morala agencija opravljati naloge, povezane z usposabljanjem o tehnični uporabi SIS II, VIS in Eurodac in drugih IT sistemov, za katere bo morda pristojna v prihodnje.
Furthermore, the Agency could also be made responsible for the preparation, development and operational management of additional large-scale IT systems in application of Articles 67 to 89 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Na podlagi členov 67 do 89 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) bi lahko bila agencija na podlagi ustreznega zakonodajnega instrumenta odgovorna tudi za pripravo, razvoj in operativno upravljanje drugih obsežnih IT sistemov.
The Agency should be entrusted with such tasks only by means of subsequent and separate legislative instruments, preceded by an impact assessment.
Agencija bi morala biti za te naloge zadolžena le na podlagi posebnih in naknadnih zakonodajnih instrumentov ter po opravljeni oceni učinka.
The Agency should be responsible for monitoring research and for carrying out pilot schemes, in accordance with Article 49(6)(a) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [8], for large-scale IT systems in application of Articles 67 to 89 TFEU, at the specific and precise request of the Commission.
Agencija bi morala biti v skladu s členom 49(6)(a) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [8], na izrecno in natančno zahtevo Komisije odgovorna za spremljanje raziskav in pilotne projekte v zvezi z obsežnimi IT sistemi na podlagi uporabe členov 67 do 89 PDEU.
When tasked with carrying out a pilot scheme, the Agency should pay particular attention to the European Union Information Management Strategy.
Pri pilotnih projektih bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti strategiji Evropske unije za upravljanje informacij.
Entrusting the Agency with the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice should not affect the specific rules applicable to those systems.
Prenos operativnega upravljanja obsežnih IT sistemov s področja svobode, varnosti in pravice na agencijo nebi smel vplivati na posebna pravila, ki se uporabljajo za te sisteme.
In particular, the specific rules governing the purpose, access rights, security measures and further data protection requirements for each large-scale IT system the operational management of which the Agency is entrusted with, are fully applicable.
Za vse obsežne IT sisteme, katerih operativno upravljanje se prenese na agencijo, se dosledno uporabljajo zlasti posebna pravila o namenu, pravici dostopa, varnostnih ukrepih in dodatnih zahtevah glede varstva podatkov.
The Member States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board, in order to control the functions of the Agency effectively.
Za učinkovit nadzor dejavnosti agencije bi morale biti v upravnem odboru zastopane države članice in Komisija.
The Management Board should be entrusted with the necessary functions, in particular to adopt the annual work programme, carry out its functions relating to the Agency’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Agency, appoint an Executive Director and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Agency by the Executive Director.
Upravnemu odboru bi se naj naložilo opravljanje ustreznih nalog, zlasti sprejetje letnega delovnega programa, izvajanje njegovih dejavnosti v zvezi s proračunom agencije, sprejetje finančnih pravil, ki se uporabljajo za agencijo, imenovanje izvršnega direktorja ter določitev postopkov za sprejemanje odločitev izvršnega direktorja v zvezi z operativnimi nalogami agencije.
As regards SIS II, the European Police Office (Europol) and the European Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust), both having the right to access and search directly data entered into SIS II in application of Decision 2007/533/JHA, should have observer status at the meetings of the Management Board when a question in relation to the application of Decision 2007/533/JHA is on the agenda.
Kar zadeva SIS II, bi morala imeti Evropski policijski urad (Europol) in Urad za evropsko pravosodno sodelovanje (Eurojust) na sejah upravnega odbora status opazovalca, če so na dnevnem redu vprašanja, povezana z uporabo Sklepa 2007/533/PNZ, saj imata v skladu z navedenim sklepom oba pravico do dostopa do podatkov, vnesenih v SIS II, in neposrednega iskanja po njih.
Europol and Eurojust should each be able to appoint a representative to the SIS II Advisory Group established under this Regulation.
Europolu in Eurojustu bi bilo treba omogočiti, da v svetovalno skupino za SIS II, ustanovljeno v skladu s to uredbo, imenujeta vsak svojega predstavnika.
As regards VIS, Europol should have observer status at the meetings of the Management Board, when a question in relation to the application of Council Decision 2008/633/JHA of 23 June 2008 concerning access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by designated authorities of Member States and by Europol for the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences [9] is on the agenda.
Kar zadeva VIS, bi moral imeti Europol na sejah upravnega odbora status opazovalca, če so na dnevnem redu vprašanja, povezana z uporabo Sklepa Sveta 2008/633/PNZ z dne 23. junija 2008 o dostopu imenovanih organov držav članic in Europola do vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) za iskanje podatkov za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj [9].
Europol should be able to appoint a representative to the VIS Advisory Group established under this Regulation.
Europolu bi bilo treba omogočiti, da v svetovalno skupino za VIS, ustanovljeno v skladu s to uredbo, imenuje svojega predstavnika.
Member States should have voting rights on the Management Board of the Agency concerning a large-scale IT system, if they are bound under Union law by any legislative instrument governing the development, establishment, operation and use of that particular system.
Države članice bi morale imeti v zvezi z obsežnim IT sistemom glasovalno pravico v upravnem odboru agencije, če je po pravu Unije za njih pravno zavezujoč kateri koli pravni instrument, ki ureja razvoj, vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporabo takšnega sistema.
Denmark should also have voting rights concerning a large-scale IT system, if it decides under Article 4 of the Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the TFEU, (Protocol on the position of Denmark) to implement the legislative instrument governing the development, establishment, operation and use of that particular system in its national law.
Danska bi tudi morala imeti glasovalno pravico v zvezi z obsežnim IT sistemom, če se v skladu s členom 4 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, priloženem Pogodbi o Evropski uniji (PEU) in PDEU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „Protokol o stališču Danske“) odloči, da bo zakonodajni instrument, ki ureja razvoj, ustanovitev, delovanje in uporabo navedenega sistema, prenesla v svoje notranje pravo.
Member States should appoint a Member to the Advisory Group concerning a large-scale IT system, if they are bound under Union law by any legislative instrument governing the development, establishment, operation and use of that particular system.
Države članice bi morale imenovati člana v svetovalno skupino za obsežni IT sistem, če je po pravu Unije za njih pravno zavezujoč kateri koli zakonodajni instrument, ki ureja razvoj, vzpostavitev, delovanje in uporabo takšnega sistema.
Denmark should, in addition, appoint a Member to the Advisory Group concerning a large-scale IT system, if it decides under Article 4 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark to implement the legislative instrument governing the development, establishment, operation and use of that particular system in its national law.
Poleg tega bi morala Danska imenovati člana v svetovalno skupino za obsežni IT sistem, če se v skladu s členom 4 Protokola o stališču Danske odloči, da bo zakonodajni instrument, ki ureja razvoj, ustanovitev, delovanje in uporabo tega obsežnega IT sistema, prenesla v svoje notranje pravo.
In order to guarantee its full autonomy and independence, the Agency should be granted an autonomous budget with revenue from the general budget of the European Union.
Za zagotovitev popolne samostojnosti in neodvisnosti agencije bi ji bilo treba zagotoviti samostojen proračun s prihodki iz splošnega proračuna Evropske unije.
The financing of the Agency should be subject to an agreement by the budgetary authority as set out in point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [10].
Za financiranje agencije bi se moral uporabljati sporazum proračunskega organa, kot je določeno v točki 47 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [10].
The Union budgetary and discharge procedures should be applicable.
Uporabljati bi se morala proračunski postopek in razrešnica.
The auditing of accounts and of the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions should be undertaken by the Court of Auditors.
Revizijo računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti osnovnih poslov bi moralo opraviti Računsko sodišče.
Within the framework of their respective competences, the Agency should cooperate with other agencies of the Union, in particular those established in the area of freedom, security and justice, and, in particular, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.
Agencija bi morala sodelovati z drugimi agencijami Unije, zlasti s tistimi, ki delujejo na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice, predvsem z Agencijo Evropske unije za temeljne pravice in pri tem upoštevati njihove pristojnosti.
It should also consult and follow up the recommendations of the European Network and Information Security Agency regarding network security, where appropriate.
Po potrebi bi se morala glede omrežne varnosti posvetovati z Evropsko agencijo za varnost omrežij in informacij.