natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The comments submitted by the parties were duly considered, and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Po ustrezni proučitvi pripomb, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
The cooperating Chinese exporting producer expressed its willingness to offer a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je izrazil pripravljenost, da ponudi cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, this company was not granted either MET or IT, and it is, in general, the Commission’s practice not to accept undertakings in such a case, since no individual determination of the duty margin could be established.
Vendar tej družbi ni bila odobrena niti TGO niti IO in na splošno Komisija v takih primerih ne sprejme zavez, saj ni mogoče individualno ugotoviti dampinga.
On this basis, price undertakings could not be considered further.
Na podlagi tega se cenovnih zavez ni moglo nadalje obravnavati.
Definitive collection of provisional duty
Dokončno pobiranje začasnih dajatev
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation be definitively collected,
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in glede na raven škode, povzročene industriji Unije, se zdi potrebno, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, dokončno poberejo –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 99,95 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN code ex81029600 (TARIC code 8102960010).
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz žice iz molibdena, ki vsebuje najmanj 99,95 mas. % molibdena, s prečnim prerezom med 1,35 mm in 4,0 mm, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščene pod oznako KN ex81029600 (oznaka TARIC 8102960010).
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 shall be 64,3 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Unije, pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelek iz odstavka 1 je 64,3 %.
Amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1247/2009 on imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 99,95 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, currently falling within CN code ex81029600 (TARIC code 8102960010), and originating in the People’s Republic of China, shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1247/2009, na uvoz žice iz molibdena, ki vsebuje najmanj 99,95 mas. % molibdena, s prečnim prerezom med 1,35 mm in 4,0 mm, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščene pod oznako KN ex81029600 (oznaka TARIC 8102960010), in s poreklom iz Republike Kitajske, se dokončno poberejo.
OJ L 336, 18.12.2009, p. 16.
UL L 336, 18.12.2009, str. 16.
The revised figures concerning the average import prices, however, now show a declining trend between 2005 and the IP.
Revidirani podatki v zvezi s povprečnimi uvoznimi cenami pa zdaj kažejo padajoč trend med letom 2005 in OP.
It was found that over the period considered the average import prices from the PRC decreased by 4 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so se v obravnavanem obdobju povprečne cene uvoza iz LRK zmanjšale za 4 %.
As a result of the revisions the import prices of the dumped imports decreased over the period considered by 4 % while remaining constantly below the prices of the Union industry, undercutting them by 30 to 35 % during the IP.
Zaradi revizij so se uvozne cene dampinškega uvoza v obravnavanem obdobju znižale za 4 %, a so bile vedno pod cenami industrije Unije, in so v OP nelojalno nižale cene za 30 do 35 %.
Consequently, the Union industry was facing price pressure by the Chinese exporters on a continued basis in order to remain competitive on the Union market.
Zato se je industrija Unije nenehno spopadala s pritiski, ki so jih na cene izvajali kitajski izvozniki, da bi lahko ohranila konkurenčnost na trgu Unije.
Regarding the importer, it is noted that it only provided overall basic data according to which it appeared that the imports of molybdenum wire from the PRC would account for between 10 and 20 % of the total imports from the PRC during the IP.
Glede uvoznika se ugotavlja, da je predložil samo splošne osnovne podatke, iz katerih se je dalo zaključiti, da bi v OP uvoz žice iz molibdena iz LRK lahko predstavljal med 10 in 20 % celotnega uvoza iz LRK.
In terms of the share of the molybdenum business in relation to the total company business — this would account for less than 7 %.
Kar se tiče deleža dejavnosti, povezane z molibdenom, glede na celotno poslovno dejavnost družbe, bi ta prestavljal manj kot 7 %.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 512/2010
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 512/2010
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz amonijevega nitrata s poreklom iz Ukrajine po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], ki razveljavlja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
On 22 January 2001, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 132/2001 [3], a definitive anti-dumping duty (‘the existing measures’) of EUR 33,25 per tonne on imports of ammonium nitrate (‘AN’) falling within CN codes 31023090 and 31024090 and originating, inter alia, in Ukraine.
Svet je 22. januarja 2001 z Uredbo (ES) št. 132/2001 [3] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev („obstoječi ukrepi“) v znesku 33,25 EUR na tono za uvoz amonijevega nitrata („AN“), uvrščenega pod oznaki KN 31023090 in 31024090 ter s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ukrajine.
The investigation that led to these measures will be referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Preiskava, ki je privedla do teh ukrepov, se bo imenovala „prvotna preiskava“.
On 17 May 2004, following a partial interim review, by Regulation (EC) No 993/2004 [4], the Council exempted from the anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 132/2001 imports to the Union of AN produced by companies from which undertakings would be accepted by the Commission.
Po delnem vmesnem pregledu je Svet 17. maja 2004 z Uredbo (ES) št. 993/2004 [4] uvoz AN v Unijo, ki ga proizvajajo družbe, od katerih bi Komisija sprejela zaveze, oprostil protidampinških dajatev, uvedenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 132/2001.
By Regulation (EC) No 945/2005 [7], following an interim review limited in scope to the definition of the product concerned, the Council decided that the definition of the product concerned should be clarified and that the measures in force should apply to the product concerned when incorporated into other fertilizers, in proportion to their content of ammonium nitrate, together with other marginal substances and nutrients.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 945/2005 [7] na podlagi opravljenega vmesnega pregleda, po obsegu omejenega na opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, odločil, da je treba opredelitev zadevnega izdelka razjasniti in da se obstoječi ukrepi v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom uporabljajo, kadar je ta vključen v druga gnojila, sorazmerno njihovemu deležu amonijevega nitrata in drugih nepomembnih snovi in hranil.
By Regulation (EC) No 442/2007 [8], following an expiry review, the Council decided to prolong the existing measures, as clarified by Regulation (EC) No 945/2005, for a period of two years.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 442/2007 [8] se je na podlagi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov Svet odločil za podaljšanje obstoječih ukrepov, kakor je pojasnjeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 945/2005, za obdobje dveh let.
By Regulation (EC) No 661/2008 [9], following an expiry review, the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of AN originating in Russia.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 661/2008 [9] je Svet na podlagi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz AN s poreklom iz Rusije.
By Regulation (EC) No 662/2008 [10], the Council amended Regulation (EC) No 442/2007 by accepting a price undertaking offered by one exporting producer.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 662/2008 [10] je Svet spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 442/2007, tako da je sprejel cenovno zavezo, ki jo je ponudil en proizvajalec izvoznik.
On 22 January 2009, a request for an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation was lodged following the publication of a notice of impending expiry on 17 October 2008 [11].
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku veljavnosti ukrepov dne 17. oktobra 2008 [11] je bil 22. januarja 2009 v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe vložen zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov.
This request was lodged by the European Fertilizer Manufacturers Association (EFMA) (‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Union production of AN.
Zahtevek je vložilo Združenje evropskih proizvajalcev gnojil (EFMA) („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje AN v Uniji.
The applicant alleged and provided sufficient prima facie evidence that there is a likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union industry with regard to imports of AN originating in Ukraine (‘the country concerned’).
Vložnik je trdil in predložil zadostne prima facie dokaze, da obstaja verjetnost ponovnega pojava dampinga in škode industriji Unije v zvezi z uvozom AN s poreklom iz Ukrajine („zadevna država“).
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 23 April 2009, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [12], the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov, in zato 23. aprila 2009 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [12], napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava v zvezi z nadaljevanjem ali ponovitvijo dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. aprila 2008 do 31. marca 2009 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 2005 to the end of the RIP (‘period considered’).
Preučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode, je zajelo obdobje od leta 2005 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Parties concerned by the investigation
Strani, ki jih zadeva preiskava
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers and users known to be concerned and their associations, the representatives of the exporting country, the applicant and the Union producers of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter njihova združenja, predstavnike države izvoznice, vložnika in proizvajalce Unije.
In view of the large number of Union producers and of Union importers, it was considered appropriate, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to examine whether sampling should be used.
Zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev in uvoznikov Unije se je zdelo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe preveri, ali se lahko uporabi vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would indeed be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above parties were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the investigation and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje dejansko potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so se morale zadevne strani v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe javiti Komisiji v 15 dneh od začetka preiskave in ji predložiti informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
After examination of the information submitted, and given that twelve Union producers indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was necessary with regard to Union producers.
Po proučitvi predloženih informacij in ob upoštevanju, da je dvanajst proizvajalcev Unije izrazilo svojo pripravljenost za sodelovanje, je bilo odločeno, da je vzorčenje v zvezi s proizvajalci Unije potrebno.
No importers came forward by providing the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Informacij, zahtevanih v obvestilu o začetku, ni predložil noben uvoznik.
Twelve Union producers, accounting for around 80 % of the total Union production during the RIP, properly completed the sampling form within the deadline and formally agreed to cooperate further in the investigation.
Dvanajst proizvajalcev Unije, katerih proizvodnja je v OPP predstavljala približno 80 % celotne proizvodnje Unije, je v roku pravilno izpolnilo obrazec za vzorčenje in se je uradno strinjalo, da bodo še naprej sodelovali v preiskavi.
On that basis, the Commission selected, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, a representative sample based on the largest representative volume of production and sales of AN in the Union which can reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe izbrala reprezentativni vzorec, ki je temeljil na največjem reprezentativnem obsegu proizvodnje in prodaje AN v Uniji, ki ga je možno v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
Five Union producers, accounting for 57 % of the total production of the Union industry during the RIP, were selected in the sample.
Za vzorec je bilo izbranih pet proizvajalcev Unije, katerih proizvodnja je predstavljala 57 % celotne proizvodnje industrije Unije v OPP.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, the parties concerned were consulted on the sample chosen and raised no objection thereto.
Komisija se je v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe o izbranem vzorcu posvetovala z zadevnimi stranmi, ki pa niso imele pripomb.
Questionnaires were sent to the five sampled Union producers and to all known exporting producers in the country concerned.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani petim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije in vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v zadevni državi.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the five sampled Union producers and three exporting producers in the country concerned.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je poslalo pet vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in trije proizvajalci izvozniki v zadevni državi.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for a determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and resulting injury and of the Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga, posledične škode in interesa Unije.
Exporting producers in Ukraine:
proizvajalci izvozniki v Ukrajini:
Union producers:
proizvajalci v Uniji:
GrowHow UK Limited, UK,
GrowHow UK Limited, Združeno kraljestvo,
GPN, Paris, France,
GPN, Pariz, Francija,
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy SA, Poland,
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy SA, Poljska,
Yara SA, Brussels, Belgium,
Yara SA, Brussels, Belgija,
The product concerned is solid fertilizers with an ammonium nitrate content exceeding 80 % by weight originating in Ukraine, currently falling within CN codes 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 and ex31059091.
Zadevni izdelek so trdna gnojila s poreklom iz Ukrajine, ki vsebujejo več kot 80 mas. % amonijevega nitrata, trenutno uvrščena pod oznake KN 31023090, 31024090, ex31022900, ex31026000, ex31029000, ex31051000, ex31052010, ex31055100, ex31055900 in ex31059091.
AN is a solid nitrogen fertiliser commonly used in agriculture.
AN je trdno dušikovo gnojilo, ki se pogosto uporablja v kmetijstvu.
It should be noted that the scope of the product concerned was clarified in Regulation (EC) No 945/2005.
Poudariti je treba, da je bil obseg zadevnega izdelka opredeljen v Uredbi (ES) št. 945/2005.
As established in the original investigation, this review investigation confirmed that AN is a pure commodity product, and its quality and basic physical characteristics are identical whatever the country of origin.
Kot je pokazala prvotna preiskava, je ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom potrdila, da je AN čist osnovni izdelek, njegova kakovost in osnovne fizikalne lastnosti pa so enake ne glede na državo porekla.
The product concerned and the products manufactured and sold by the exporting producers on their domestic market and to third countries, as well as those manufactured and sold by the Union producers on the Union market, have thus been found to have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and essentially the same uses and are, therefore, considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za zadevni izdelek, izdelke, ki jih proizvedejo in prodajo proizvajalci izvozniki na domačem trgu in v tretjih državah, prav tako pa tudi za izdelke, ki jih proizvajalci Unije proizvedejo in prodajo na trgu Unije, je bilo tako ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti in v glavnem enako uporabo in se zato štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Cooperation was obtained from three Ukrainian exporting producers.
Sodelovali so trije ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki.
A fourth known exporting producer did not cooperate in the investigation.
Četrti znani proizvajalec izvoznik ni sodeloval v preiskavi.
The comparison of the export volume of the three cooperating exporting producers with the total volume of exports to the Union from Ukraine showed that the three cooperating exporting producers accounted for more than 90 % of all Union imports from Ukraine during the RIP.
Primerjava obsega izvoza treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov s celotnim obsegom izvoza iz Ukrajine v Unijo je pokazala, da je v OPP uvoz treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov predstavljal več kot 90 % celotnega uvoza Unije iz Ukrajine.
The level of cooperation was therefore considered to be high.
Zato se je stopnja sodelovanja štela za visoko.
Total import volumes of the product concerned from Ukraine were low, representing a market share of 1,1 % in the RIP when compared to the Union market as a whole.
Skupne količine uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Ukrajine so bile majhne, v primerjavi s trgom Unije kot celoto so v OPP predstavljale tržni delež 1,1 %.
It is recalled that in the previous expiry review, Ukraine was not yet considered a market economy country and therefore the normal value was based on data obtained from a cooperating producer in the USA, the analogue country.
Spomniti je treba, da pri prejšnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov Ukrajina še ni štela za državo tržnega gospodarstva in je zaradi tega normalna vrednost temeljila na podatkih, dobljenih od sodelujočega proizvajalca v ZDA kot primerljive države.
In the present review, normal value was based on data obtained and verified at the premises of the three cooperating exporting producers in Ukraine.
V tem pregledu je normalna vrednost temeljila na podatkih, pridobljenih in preverjenih v prostorih treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Ukrajini.
The Commission examined whether their domestic sales could be considered as having been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je proučila, ali se lahko njihova domača prodaja šteje za običajni potek trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
To this end, the cost of production of the product produced and sold on the domestic market by the cooperating exporting producers were examined.
V ta namen so bili proučeni proizvodni stroški izdelka, ki ga sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki proizvedejo in prodajo na domačem trgu.
As regards gas costs, it was found that Ukraine was importing the majority of the gas consumed in the production of AN from Russia.
V zvezi s stroški plina je bilo ugotovljeno, da Ukrajina večino plina, porabljenega pri proizvodnji AN, uvozi iz Rusije.
All data available and verified during the investigation indicated that Ukraine imported natural gas from Russia at a price which was, during the RIP, around 40 % below the price of natural gas from Russia when exported to the Union.
Vsi podatki, ki so bili na voljo in preverjeni med preiskavo so pokazali, da je Ukrajina uvažala naravni plin iz Rusije po ceni, ki je bila v OPP okoli 40 % nižja od cene naravnega plina, izvoženega iz Rusije v Unijo.
However, it was found that in the last quarter of the RIP the prices were similar.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile v zadnjem četrtletju OPP cene podobne.
It was found that apart from one product type exported by one producer, domestic sales were made in the ordinary course of trade during the RIP.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila z izjemo ene vrste izdelka, ki ga je izvažal en proizvajalec, prodaja na domačem trgu del poteka običajne trgovine v OPP.
Normal value was therefore established either based on the price paid or payable on the domestic market in Ukraine by unrelated customers pursuant to Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation or based on constructed normal value for the product type not sold in the ordinary course of trade.
Normalna vrednost je zato bila določena na podlagi cene, ki so jo na domačem trgu v Ukrajini plačevale ali jo plačujejo nepovezane strani v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe ali na podlagi konstruirane normalne vrednosti za vrsto izdelka, ki se ne prodaja v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine.
In accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported type a reasonable amount of selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
V skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da se je proizvodnim stroškom izvožene vrste izdelka prištel razumni znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA-stroški) ter razumna stopnja dobička.
These amounts for SG&A and profit were based on actual data pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product, by the producer concerned.
Ti zneski za PSA-stroške in za dobičke temeljijo na dejanskih podatkih o proizvodnji in prodaji podobnega izdelka zadevnega proizvajalca pri običajnem poteku trgovine.