natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A reasonable amount for SG&A and profits, respectively 16 % and 8 % were added to the manufacturing cost as established above, on the basis of the information submitted in the complaint.
K tako ugotovljenim proizvodnim stroškom sta bila na podlagi informacij, predloženih v pritožbi, prišteta razumna zneska 16 % za stroške PSA in 8 % za dobiček.
The exporting producer made export sales to the Union through its related trading company located outside the Union.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je izvažal v Unijo prek svoje povezane trgovske družbe s sedežem zunaj Unije.
The export price was established on the basis of the prices of the product when sold by the related trading company to the Union, i.e. to an independent buyer, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of prices actually paid or payable.
Izvozna cena je bila določena na podlagi cen, po katerih je povezana trgovska družba izdelek prodajala v Unijo, to je neodvisnemu kupcu, in sicer v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
Adjustments for differences in transport and insurance costs and credit costs have been made where applicable and justified.
Opravljene so bile tudi prilagoditve zaradi razlik v stroških prevoza, zavarovanja in posojila, kjer je bilo to primerno in utemeljeno.
Pursuant to Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin for the cooperating exporting producer was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value by product type with a weighted average export price by product type as established above.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti glede na vrsto izdelka s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno glede na vrsto izdelka, kot je določeno zgoraj.
On the basis of the above methodology the provisional dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Začasne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, na podlagi navedene metodologije znašajo:
Since the cooperating exporting producer accounted for all Thai exports to the Union of the product concerned, it was considered that the residual dumping margin should be set at the level of dumping margin found for this cooperating exporting producer, i.e. 17,2 %.
Ker je ves tajski izvoz zadevnega izdelka v Unijo opravil sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, je bila sprejeta odločitev, da bi se morala preostala stopnja dampinga določiti v višini stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, torej na stopnji 17,2 %.
During the investigation period RBM were manufactured in the EU by the following producers:
V obdobju preiskave sta obročne mehanizme za vezavo v EU proizvajala naslednja proizvajalca:
Ring Alliance Ringbuchtechnik GmbH, Wien, Austria,
Ring Alliance Ringbuchtechnik GmbH, Dunaj, Avstrija,
The investigation has established that the applicant represented more than 50 % of the total Union production of RBM in the IP.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vložnik v obdobju preiskave predstavljal več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo v Uniji.
The second (smaller) producer is also an importer of RBM from Thailand and opposed the proceedings.
Drugi (manjši) proizvajalec je tudi uvoznik obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo iz Tajske in je postopku nasprotoval.
On the basis of the information provided by the company, it was found that during the overall period considered for the injury analysis the volume of its purchases of Thai products was on average comparable to the volume of its own production.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila družba, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila v celotnem obdobju, obravnavanem za analizo škode, količina kupljenih tajskih izdelkov v povprečju primerljiva s količino, ki jo je družba proizvedla sama.
On the basis of the above it is considered that, pursuant to Article 4(1)(a), the second producer should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry, and therefore only the applicant producer should constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi navedenega se šteje, da je treba v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) drugega proizvajalca izključiti iz opredelitve industrije Unije, zato mora industrijo Unije v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe predstavljati samo proizvajalec vložnik.
It should be noted that in the past, the Union industry was originally composed of two different producers (Koloman Handler — Austria and Robert Krause — Germany) that went bankrupt and taken over by an Austrian group.
Opozoriti je treba, da sta v preteklosti industrijo Unije prvotno sestavljala dva proizvajalca (Koloman Handler – Avstrija in Robert Krause – Nemčija), ki sta šla v stečaj in ju je prevzela avstrijska skupina.
Consumption was established on the basis of the following figures:
Potrošnja je bila določena na podlagi naslednjih informacij:
the verified total sales on the Union market reported by the Union industry and the other EU producer,
preverjene celotne prodaje na trgu Unije, ki jo je sporočila industrija Unije in drugi proizvajalec EU,
the verified total EU export volume of the cooperating exporting producer in Thailand for the periods requested in the questionnaire (the years 2008, 2009 and IP), and Eurostat for the other years,
preverjenega skupnega obsega izvoza v EU sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika na Tajskem za obdobje, zahtevano v vprašalniku (leti 2008 in 2009 ter obdobje preiskave) in Eurostatovi podatki za preostala leta,
Eurostat for imports from the other third countries.
Eurostatovih podatkov o uvozu iz drugih tretjih držav.
On this basis, the EU consumption of RBM developed as follows:
Na podlagi tega je bilo ugotovljeno naslednje gibanje potrošnje obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo v Uniji:
Source: verified questionnaire replies and Eurostat.
Vir: preverjeni izpolnjeni vprašalniki in Eurostat.
Consumption (000pces)
Potrošnja (v tisoč kosih)
The consumption declined by 5 % during the overall injury investigation period [3].
Potrošnja se je v celotnem obdobju preiskave škode zmanjšala za 5 %.
It should however be noted that after an increase of around 10 % between 2006 and 2008, the consumption dropped by 15 % in the subsequent period.
Kljub temu pa je treba opozoriti, da se je po povečanju za približno 10 % med letoma 2006 in 2008 potrošnja v naslednjem obdobju zmanjšala za 15 %.
Imports from Thailand
Uvoz iz Tajske
Source: verified questionnaire reply and Eurostat.
Vir: preverjen izpolnjen vprašalnik in Eurostat.
Imports from Thailand for the period 2008-IP are based on the questionnaire reply of the co-operating exporting producer — the sole known Thai exporter — and based on Eurostat data for the other years.
Informacije o uvozu iz Tajske za obdobje od leta 2008 do obdobja preiskave temeljijo na izpolnjenem vprašalniku sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, edinega znanega tajskega izvoznika, za druga leta pa temeljijo na Eurostatovih podatkih.
On this basis, it was established that total import volume of RBM from Thailand increased by almost 20 % between 2006 and the IP.
Tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je skupni obseg uvoza obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo iz Tajske od leta 2006 do obdobja preiskave povečal za skoraj 20 %.
The level of imports however fluctuated significantly during this period, and the most important increase took place between 2007 and 2008, when imports more than doubled.
Vendar pa se je stopnja uvoza v tem obdobju precej spreminjala in najpomembnejše povečanje je nastopilo med letoma 2007 in 2008, ko se je uvoz več kot podvojil.
The Thai market shares followed an overall increasing trend and gained 3 points between 2006 and the IP.
Tajski tržni delež je na splošno naraščal in se od leta 2006 do obdobja preiskave povečal za 3 točke.
Similarly to the sales volume, the market shares reached a peak in 2008, at a level of 16,5 %.
Podobno kot prodaja je bil tudi tržni delež največji leta 2008, ko je dosegel stopnjo 16,5 %.
Price of the imports of the product concerned/undercutting
Cena uvoza zadevnega izdelka / nelojalno nižanje cen
import price
Uvozna cena
Import prices first increased by more than 20 % between 2006 and 2008 and declined subsequently.
Uvozne cene so se najprej za več kot 20 % povečale med letoma 2006 in 2008, potem pa so se zmanjšale.
Despite an overall increase of 13 % during the injury investigation period, the Thai prices significantly undercut the Union producers’ prices during the IP.
Kljub skupnemu povečanju za 13 % v obdobju preiskave škode so tajske cene nelojalno močno nižale prodajne cene proizvajalcev Unije.
The price comparison for corresponding models, duly adjusted where necessary, indeed showed that on average import prices were more than 30 % below the Union industry’s sales price during the IP.
Primerjava cen za primerljive modele, ki so bile po potrebi ustrezno prilagojene, je dejansko pokazala, da so bile v obdobju preiskave uvozne cene v povprečju več kot 30 % nižje od prodajnih cen industrije Unije.
A comparison of the average price level during the other years suggests comparable undercutting rates for the years 2006-2009.
Primerjava povprečnih cen v preostalih letih kaže, da so bile cene v letih od 2006 do 2009 nižje za podobno stopnjo.
The absolute level of Thai import prices was also systematically below the price of other imports and — to a larger extent — below the price of the other Union producer.
Tudi absolutna stopnja tajskih uvoznih cen je bila ves čas nižja od drugih uvoznih cen in večinoma pa tudi od cene drugega proizvajalca Unije.
Economic situation of the Union industry [4]
Gospodarski položaj industrije Unije [4]
During the overall period, both the production and the production capacity decreased respectively by almost 20 % and 25 %.
V celotnem obdobju se je proizvodnja zmanjšala za skoraj 20 %, proizvodna zmogljivost pa za skoraj 25 %.
The increasing capacity utilisation should only be seen as the result of a reduction of the production capacity by 25 % during the same period.
Vse večjo izkoriščenost zmogljivosti je treba razlagati le kot rezultat zmanjšanja proizvodne zmogljivosti za 25 % v istem obdobju.
This is mainly the result of lay-offs (see employment below).
To je predvsem posledica odpuščanj (glej razdelek o zaposlovanju ).
It should however be noted that production volume and capacity first improved until 2008, and then decreased significantly.
Kljub temu pa je treba opozoriti, da sta se obseg proizvodnje in proizvodna zmogljivost do leta 2008 najprej izboljševala, nato pa sta se precej zmanjšala.
In the injury investigation period, the Union industry's stocks increased overall by 26 %.
V obdobju preiskave škode so se zaloge industrije Unije povečale za skupno 26 %.
A significant part of the RBM production consists of standard products, and the Union industry has to maintain a certain level of stock in order to be in a position to swiftly satisfy the demand of its customers.
Pomemben del proizvodnje obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo zajema standardne izdelke in industrija Unije mora ohranjati določeno raven zalog, da se lahko hitro odzove na povpraševanje svojih strank.
Any increase of the closing stock above the average level nevertheless indicates difficulties to sell the products.
Kljub temu pa vsako povečanje končnih zalog nad povprečno stopnjo kaže na težave pri prodaji izdelkov.
The Union industry’s sales volume on the EU market decreased by 23 % over the period analysed, which corresponded to declining market shares from 29,6 % to 24,0 %, i.e. a drop of more than 5 points.
Obseg prodaje industrije Unije na trgu EU se je v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 23 %, kar je ustrezalo zmanjšanju tržnega deleža z 29,6 % na 24,0 %, tj. padcu za več kot 5 točk.
Sales volume and market shares in fact deteriorated as from 2008.
V primerjavi z letom 2008 sta se obseg prodaje in tržni delež dejansko poslabšala.
The above development overall indicates an absence of Union industry growth between 2006 and the IP.
Navedeno gibanje na splošno kaže, da v industriji Unije med letom 2006 in obdobjem preiskave ni bilo rasti.
This price increase is the result of a combination of two factors: a change of product mix due to the decreasing sales volume of the more standardised — and cheaper — products, and the Union industry’s attempt to compensate for the losses incurred in 2008.
To zvišanje cene je rezultat kombinacije dveh dejavnikov: spremembe ponudbe izdelkov zaradi zmanjševanja obsega prodaje bolj standardiziranih in cenejših izdelkov ter poskusa industrije Unije, da nadomesti izgube iz leta 2008.
The latter was however not successful since the Union industry continued to operate at a loss in the subsequent period (see below).
Ta poskus pa ni bil uspešen, ker je industrija Unije tudi v naslednjem obdobju še naprej poslovala z izgubo (glej nadaljevanje).
P&L % turnover
Dobiček in izgube v % prometa
The Union industry was loss making during the overall injury investigation period, and the above trend shows an overall increase of the level of losses.
Industrija Unije je ustvarjala izgubo v celotnem obdobju preiskave škode, zgoraj predstavljeno gibanje pa kaže splošno povečanje stopnje izgub.
While the situation slightly improved in 2007 (it became nearly break even), it however deteriorated as from 2008.
Čeprav se je leta 2007 stanje nekoliko izboljšalo (dobiček in izguba sta se skoraj izravnala), pa se je leta 2008 poslabšalo.
While the decline in cash-flow could somehow be limited, it also remained negative as from 2007.
Čeprav je bilo zmanjšanje denarnih tokov mogoče nekako omejiti, so od leta 2007 naprej tudi ti ostajali negativni.
The return on net assets was also negative during the overall period and constantly declined between 2006 and the IP.
Tudi donosnost neto sredstev je bila v celotnem obdobju negativna in se je med letom 2006 in obdobjem preiskave nenehno zmanjševala.
Investments followed a sharp decreasing trend, i.e. – 75 % during the overall injury investigation period.
Pri naložbah je v celotnem obdobju preiskave škode mogoče opaziti močan upad, tj. – 75 %.
As stated above, given the weak financial situation of Union industry it can be concluded that its ability to raise capital from independent sources was seriously affected.
Kot je bilo navedeno, se glede na slabo finančno stanje industrije Unije lahko ugotovi, da je bila njena zmožnost zbiranja kapitala iz neodvisnih virov resno prizadeta.
During the overall period employment (full-time units) decreased by 13 % and the most important decline took place after the year 2008 when employment reached a peak.
V celotnem obdobju se je zaposlenost (enote polnega delovnega časa) zmanjšala za 13 %, najpomembnejši padec pa je nastopil po letu 2008, ko je zaposlenost dosegla vrhunec.
Wages mostly followed the same trend.
Gibanje plač je bilo večinoma enako.
Productivity, measured in thousand of pieces produced per employee during the period, generally followed the same trend as employment, but the decline could be limited during the IP.
Gibanje produktivnosti, merjene v tisoč proizvedenih kosih na zaposlenega v obdobju, je bilo na splošno enako gibanju zaposlenosti, vendar bi bilo zmanjševanje mogoče omejiti v obdobju preiskave.
On the basis of the best facts available, the investigation has established the existence of dumping during the IP of 17,2 %, which is substantial.
Na podlagi najboljših razpoložljivih dejstev je bil v preiskavi ugotovljen obstoj dampinga v obdobju preiskave v višini 17,2 %, kar je precejšen delež.
Recovery from the effect of past dumping
Okrevanje od učinka preteklega dampinga
The Union industry has been suffering from the effects of dumped imports for several years.
Industrija Unije je več let trpela posledice zaradi učinkov dampinškega uvoza.
It could nevertheless benefit from relatively effective measures until the year 2008, but the situation deteriorated again thereafter.
Do leta 2008 je vseeno lahko pridobivala zaradi razmeroma učinkovitih ukrepov, vendar se je stanje zatem spet poslabšalo.
This is further explained in the section related to Union interest below.
To je natančneje razloženo v oddelku o interesih Unije.
The economic situation of the Union industry clearly deteriorated between 2006 and the IP.
Gospodarski položaj industrije Unije se je od leta 2006 do obdobja preiskave opazno poslabšal.
This was especially characterised by a significant decrease of production and sale volume (respectively – 17 %, – 13 %), which also resulted in decline of market share from 29,6 % to 24 %.
Za to poslabšanje je bilo značilno precejšnje zmanjšanje obsega proizvodnje in prodaje (– 17 % oziroma – 13 %), kar je privedlo tudi do zmanjšanja tržnega deleža z 29,6 % na 24 %.
The financial situation of the Union Industry was also affected.
Prizadet je bil tudi finančni položaj industrije Unije.
The level of losses incurred by the company indeed increased, and both cash-flow and return on net assets followed the same negative trend.
Stopnja izgub, ki jih je utrpela družba, se je dejansko povečala in tudi gibanje na področju denarnih tokov in donosnosti neto sredstev je bilo negativno.
The attempt of the Union industry to limit the level of the losses by increasing its prices in 2009 was not successful, and the situation even worsened.
Poskus industrije Unije, da bi omejila stopnjo izgub z zvišanjem cen v letu 2009, ni bil uspešen, stanje se je celo poslabšalo.
Consequently, the investments were reduced to their minimum level, and the company had no choice but to lay off a substantial number of people in order to face the situation.
Zaradi tega so bile naložbe zmanjšane na najnižjo stopnjo in družba se je z nastalim položajem morala spoprijeti tako, da je odpustila precej ljudi.
Those indicators however significantly dropped since 2009.
Vendar pa so se ti kazalci po letu 2009 naprej precej zmanjšali.
The profitability indicators on the other hand remained negative during the overall period; although profitability was close to break even in 2007.
Po drugi strani pa so kazalci dobičkonosnosti ostajali negativni v celotnem obdobju, čeprav se je leta 2007 dobičkonosnost močno približala ničli.
Considering the above, it is provisionally concluded that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno se začasno ugotovi, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether the material injury suffered by the Union industry has been caused by the dumped imports from the country concerned.
V skladu s členom 3(6) in (7) osnovne uredbe je bilo preučeno, ali je znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, povzročil dampinški uvoz iz zadevne države.
Furthermore, known factors other than the dumped imports, which might have injured the Union industry, were examined to ensure that any injury caused by those other factors was not attributed to the dumped imports.
Poleg tega so bili poleg dampinškega uvoza preučeni znani dejavniki, ki bi lahko povzročili škodo industriji Unije, da se morebitna škoda, ki bi jo ti drugi dejavniki lahko povzročili, ne bi pripisala dampinškemu uvozu.
It is to be noted that the Union market is characterised by a relatively small number of sources of supply (two in the Union, one in India, one in Thailand and still some supply from China) and that the market is therefore quite transparent in terms of prices, through price quotations.
Opozoriti je treba, da je za trg Unije značilno razmeroma malo virov dobave (dva v Uniji, en v Indiji, en na Tajskem in še vedno nekaj dobave iz Kitajske) in da je zaradi navajanja cen trg cenovno precej pregleden.
Furthermore a significant part of the demand in the EU concerns standard types of RBM, for which price is by far a decisive factor when purchasing the product.
Poleg tega velik del povpraševanja v EU zadeva standardne tipe obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo, pri katerih je cena daleč najbolj odločilen dejavnik za nakup izdelka.
In this context, the investigation showed that the volume of imports of RBM from Thailand increased by almost 20 % during the injury investigation period, and reached a market share of 15 % during the IP.
V tem smislu je preiskava pokazala, da se je obseg uvoza obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo iz Tajske povečal za skoraj 20 % v obdobju preiskave škode in je v obdobju preiskave dosegel 15-odstotni tržni delež.
The Union industry lost a significant volume of sales during the same period.
Industrija Unije je v istem obdobju imela znaten padec obsega prodaje.
Furthermore it was established that, during the IP, RBM from Thailand undercut the Union industry's prices by more than 30 %, which is very significant for this kind of product.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile v obdobju preiskave cene obročnih mehanizmov za vezavo iz Tajske nelojalno znižale prodajne cene industrije Unije za več kot 30 %, kar je za tovrsten izdelek veliko.
The combination of the important volume of import and of the low price level led to a significant price pressure on the Union market.
Kombinacija pomembnega obsega uvoza in nizke ravni cen je privedla do znatnih cenovnih pritiskov na trgu Unije.
In the absence of dumping, Thai prices would have been — at least during the IP — almost 20 % higher than their actual level, and this could have meant an overall higher Union market price.
Brez dampinga bi bile tajske cene, vsaj v obdobju preiskave, skoraj 20 % višje, kot so dejansko bile, in to bi lahko pomenilo na splošno višjo ceno na trgu Unije.
Given their volume and the level of their prices, it is thus considered that the dumped imports undermined the attempt of the Union industry to regain profit, or at least reduce its losses, by increasing its sales quantities and/or prices to a more adequate level during the period 2009-IP.
Glede na obseg dampinškega uvoza in raven cen se tako šteje, da je dampinški uvoz oviral poskus industrije Unije, da bi znova začela ustvarjati dobiček ali vsaj zmanjšala izgubo tako, da bi v obdobju od 2009 do obdobja preiskave povečala obseg prodaje in/ali cene na primernejšo raven.
The continued pressure exercised by the low-priced dumped imports from Thailand on the Union market thus resulted in the loss in sales volume, market shares, depressed prices and consequently the loss in profitability of the Union industry.
Stalen pritisk zaradi dampinškega uvoza z nizkimi cenami iz Tajske na trg Unije je tako privedel do zmanjšanja obsega prodaje, tržnega deleža, cen in s tem do izgube dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije.
It should be recalled that in a recent expiry review investigation [5] it was concluded that the industry was still in a very precarious situation in 2008 and still extremely sensitive to any further dumped imports.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bilo v nedavni preiskavi zaradi izteka ukrepa [5] ugotovljeno, da je bila industrija leta 2008 še vedno v zelo negotovem položaju in še izjemno občutljiva za morebitno nadaljevanje dampinškega uvoza.
In view of the above it was provisionally concluded that the dumped imports from Thailand had a negative impact on the economic situation of the Union industry.
Glede na navedeno je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da je dampinški uvoz iz Tajske negativno vplival na gospodarski položaj industrije Unije.
Contraction in demand on the Union market
Zmanjšanje povpraševanja na trgu Unije
The demand on the Union market increased by 10 % in 2008, but then significantly declined in the subsequent year, by around 15 %.
Povpraševanje na trgu Unije se je leta 2008 povečalo za 10 %, vendar je v naslednjem letu močno upadlo, in sicer za približno 15 %.
This should be seen in the context of the financial crisis, and the decision of many companies to cut general costs, including for stationary items.
Pri tem je treba upoštevati tudi finančno krizo in odločitev številnih podjetij, da bodo zmanjšala splošne stroške, vključno s stroški za pisarniški material.