natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If it becomes clear before, during or after the evaluation phase that one or more of the eligibility criteria have not been fulfilled, the proposal is declared ineligible by the Commission, and is withdrawn from any further examination.
Če se pred ocenjevanjem, med njim ali po njem izkaže, da predlog ne izpolnjuje enega ali več meril ustreznosti, ga Komisija razglasi za neustreznega in ga izključi iz nadaljnjega postopka ocenjevanja.
Where there is a doubt on the eligibility of a proposal, the Commission reserves the right to proceed with the evaluation, pending a final decision on eligibility.
Kjer obstaja dvom o ustreznosti predloga, si Komisija pridrži pravico, da nadaljuje postopek ocenjevanja do sprejema končne odločitve o ustreznosti predloga.
The fact that a proposal is evaluated in such circumstances does not constitute proof of its eligibility.
Dejstvo, da se predlog ocenjuje v takih okoliščinah, še ne dokazuje, da je ustrezen.
If the question of eligibility is not clear-cut and a more comprehensive review of the case is deemed necessary, the call coordinator may convene an internal eligibility review committee.
Če vprašanje ustreznosti ni jasno razrešeno in je treba primer izčrpneje pregledati, koordinator razpisa lahko skliče interni odbor za preverjanje ustreznosti.
The committee’s role is to ensure a coherent legal interpretation of such cases and equal treatment of applicants.
Vloga odbora je zagotoviti skladno pravno razlago takih primerov in enako obravnavo vložnikov.
This committee, composed of Commission staff having the requisite expertise in legal matters, S & T content, and/or information systems, is chaired by the call coordinator.
Predsednik tega odbora, sestavljenega iz osebja Komisije, ki ima potrebno strokovno znanje prava, znanosti in tehnologije in/ali informacijskih sistemov, je koordinator razpisa.
It examines the proposal and, if necessary, the circumstances surrounding its submission; and provides specialist advice to support the decision on whether to allow a proposal to be evaluated, or on whether or not to reject it on eligibility grounds.
Ta preuči predlog in, če je potrebno, okoliščine v zvezi z njegovo oddajo ter predloži strokovne nasvete, da utemelji odločitev o tem, ali naj se predlog sprejme v ocenjevanje oziroma zavrne zaradi neustreznosti.
The committee may decide to contact the applicant in order to clarify a particular issue.
Odbor se lahko odloči in naveže stik z vložnikom, da se razjasni določeno vprašanje.
EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
OCENJEVANJE PREDLOGOV
The Commission evaluates proposals with the assistance of independent [16] experts to ensure that only those of the highest quality are selected for funding.
Komisija oceni predloge s pomočjo neodvisnih [16] strokovnjakov in tako zagotovi, da se sredstva dodelijo samo najbolj kakovostnim predlogom.
Because of the breadth and diversity of research domains covered by the framework programmes, these experts are external to the Commission.
Zaradi širine in raznolikosti raziskovalnih področij, ki jih pokrivajo okvirni programi, Komisija poišče pomoč pri zunanjih strokovnjakih.
Experts may be invited to carry out the evaluation fully or partially at their home or place of work (“remote evaluation”), or on Commission premises.
Strokovnjaki lahko ocenjevanje v celoti ali delno opravijo od doma, delovnega mesta (‚ocenjevanje na daljavo‘) ali v prostorih Komisije.
Occasionally, when relevant specialised knowledge is held in-house, Commission staff may work as experts alongside external experts.
Občasno, kadar je interno na voljo ustrezno specializirano znanje, strokovnjaki iz osebja Komisije lahko sodelujejo z zunanjimi strokovnjaki.
Any such internal experts will work in addition to the minimum number required for the call (see section 3.8(b)) [17].
Vsi ti interni strokovnjaki opravljajo dodatno delo poleg minimalnega števila, ki se zahteva za razpis (glej oddelek 3.8.(b)) [17].
The sole exception to the use of experts is in the case of coordination and support actions referred to in Article 14 of the EC Rules for Participation, and Article 13 of the equivalent Euratom Rules for Participation, where independent experts are only appointed if the Commission deems it appropriate [18].
Edina izjema v zvezi s strokovnjaki velja pri usklajevalnih in podpornih ukrepih iz člena 14 pravil ES za udeležbo in iz člena 13 enakovrednih pravil Euratom za udeležbo, ko se neodvisni strokovnjaki imenujejo samo, če Komisija presodi, da je to potrebno [18].
Experts are required to have skills and knowledge appropriate to the areas of activity in which they are asked to assist.
Strokovnjaki se izberejo na podlagi usposobljenosti in znanja, ki ustrezajo področjem dejavnosti, za katere je potrebna njihova pomoč.
They must also have a high level of professional experience in the public or private sector in one or more of the following areas or activities: research in the relevant scientific and technological fields; administration, management or evaluation of projects; use of the results of research and technological development projects; technology transfer and innovation; international cooperation in science and technology; development of human resources.
Od njih se pričakuje tudi, da imajo strokovne izkušnje na visoki ravni v javnem ali zasebnem sektorju z eno ali več od naslednjih dejavnosti: raziskave na ustreznem znanstveno-tehnološkem področju; administracija, vodenje ali ocenjevanje projektov; uporaba rezultatov raziskovalnih in tehnološko-razvojnih projektov; prenos tehnologije in inovacije; mednarodno sodelovanje v znanosti in tehnologiji; razvoj človeških virov.
Experts may be citizens of countries other than the Member States or countries associated to the framework programmes.
Strokovnjaki so lahko državljani držav, ki niso države članice, ali držav, povezanih z okvirnimi programi.
The Commission establishes a database of experts containing the details of suitable candidates on the basis of calls for applications published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija vzpostavi podatkovno zbirko o strokovnjakih z vsemi podatki o ustreznih kandidatih na podlagi razpisov, objavljenih v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
One call will be addressed to individuals and another to relevant organisations such as national research agencies, research institutions and enterprises.
En razpis bo naslovljen na posameznike in drug na ustrezne organizacije, kot so nacionalne raziskovalne agencije, raziskovalni inštituti in podjetja.
The Commission may at any time include in the database, if appropriate, any individual with the appropriate skills from outside the lists obtained through the above-mentioned calls.
Komisija lahko kadar koli, če se ji zdi primerno, v podatkovno zbirko vključi ustrezno usposobljenega posameznika, ki ni na seznamih, pridobljenih z zgoraj navedenimi razpisi.
Experts in the database may be invited to assist the Commission in relation to activities other than the evaluation of research proposals, if they have indicated their willingness to be considered for such tasks.
Strokovnjaki iz podatkovne zbirke so lahko povabljeni, da Komisiji pomagajo pri drugih dejavnostih, ki ne zajemajo ocenjevanja raziskovalnih predlogov, če so izrazili svojo pripravljenost za opravljanje takih nalog.
The database may be made available, on request, to research funding bodies with a public service mission, in the Member States and countries associated to the framework programmes, and to other structures implementing EU research activities, created in line with the provisions of the Treaty.
Podatkovna zbirka se lahko na zahtevo da na voljo organom, ki opravljajo javno službo in financirajo raziskovanje v državah članicah in državah, povezanih z okvirnimi programi, in z drugimi strukturami, ki izvajajo raziskovalne dejavnosti EU, temelječe na določbah Pogodbe.
Decisions on granting such access will be made by the Director-General for DG Research and Innovation or by his/her representative(s).
Odločitve o odobritvi takega dostopa sprejme generalni direktor GD za raziskave in inovacije ali njegov zastopnik.
The database may also be used by the Commission’s Joint Research Centre for the selection of experts in support of research activities carried out as direct actions [19].
Podatkovno zbirko lahko uporablja tudi Skupno raziskovalno središče Komisije za izbiro strokovnjakov v podporo raziskovalnim dejavnostim, ki se izvajajo kot posredni ukrepi [19].
To evaluate the proposals submitted in response to a call, the Commission draws up a list of appropriate experts (including, if necessary, a reserve list).
Za ocenjevanje predlogov, predloženih na razpis, Komisija pripravi seznam primernih strokovnjakov (in po potrebi tudi rezervni seznam).
The lists are drawn up primarily using the selection criteria:
Seznami se sestavijo predvsem na podlagi naslednjih meril za izbor:
a high level of expertise,
visoka stopnja strokovnosti,
an appropriate range of competencies.
primeren obseg pristojnosti.
Providing the above conditions can be satisfied, other criteria are also taken into consideration:
Če so zgornji pogoji izpolnjeni, se lahko upoštevajo tudi druga merila:
an appropriate balance between academic and industrial expertise and users,
uravnotežena udeležba akademske in industrijske stroke ter uporabnikov,
a reasonable gender balance [20],a reasonable distribution of geographical origins [21],
primerna zastopanost spolov [20],primerna zastopanost z različnih geografskih območij [21],
regular rotation of experts [22].
redno menjavanje strokovnjakov [22].
In constituting the lists of experts, the Commission also takes account, as necessary, of their abilities to appreciate the industrial and/or societal dimension, and policy relevance, of the topics covered by the call.
Pri sestavljanju seznamov strokovnjakov Komisija po potrebi upošteva tudi njihovo sposobnost razumevanja industrijske in/ali družbene razsežnosti in politične pomembnosti tem, zajetih v razpis.
In cases where experts will have to deal with classified information, the appropriate security clearance shall be required before appointment [23].
Če bodo morali strokovnjaki obdelovati zaupne informacije, se za njihovo imenovanje zahteva ustrezno varnostno potrdilo [23].
The list of experts to be used for evaluation sessions is decided by the relevant authorising officer by sub delegation or duly appointed delegates.
O seznamu strokovnjakov, ki sodelujejo pri posameznem ocenjevanju, odločajo ustrezen odredbodajalec na podlagi prenosa ali ustrezno imenovani delegati.
The names of the experts assigned to individual proposals are not made public.
Imena strokovnjakov, dodeljenih posameznim predlogom, niso objavljena.
However, once a year, the Commission publishes on the Internet the list of experts used for the framework programmes and in each specific programme.
Enkrat letno pa Komisija na internetu objavi seznam strokovnjakov, ki pridejo v poštev za okvirne programe in za vsak poseben program.
Terms of appointment, Code of conduct and Conflict of interest
Pogoji za imenovanje, kodeks ravnanja in navzkrižje interesov
The Commission shall conclude an “appointment letter” with each expert, based on the model given in Annex F.
Komisija podpiše ‚obvestilo o imenovanju‘ z vsakim strokovnjakom na podlagi vzorca iz Priloge F.
The appointment letter binds the expert to a code of conduct, establishes the essential provisions regarding confidentiality, and, specifies in particular, the description of work, the conditions of payment, and reimbursement of expenses (see Annex F).
To obvestilo o imenovanju zavezuje strokovnjaka k uporabi kodeksa ravnanja, opredeli bistvene določbe v zvezi z zaupnostjo in zlasti določa opis dela, plačilne pogoje in povračilo stroškov (glej Prilogo F).
When appointing experts, the Commission [24] must take all necessary steps to ensure that they are not faced with a conflict of interest in relation to the proposals on which they are required to give an opinion.
Komisija [24] se pri imenovanju strokovnjaka prepriča, da se strokovnjak ne sooča z navzkrižjem interesov v zvezi s predlogi, glede katerih se od njega zahteva mnenje.
To this end, experts are required to sign a declaration that no such conflict of interest exists (see Annex F) at the time of their appointment and that they undertake to inform the Commission of both the existence and its nature should one arise in the course of their duties.
V ta namen mora strokovnjak podpisati izjavo, da v času imenovanja ne obstaja navzkrižje interesov (glej Prilogo F) in da se obvezuje, da bo obvestil Komisijo o obstoju in naravi takega navzkrižja interesov, če se pojavi med opravljanjem njegovih dolžnosti.
When so informed, the Commission takes all necessary actions to remove the conflict of interest.
Če je Komisija o tem obveščena, sprejme vse ukrepe, potrebne za odstranitev navzkrižja interesov.
In addition, all experts are required to confirm that they have no conflict of interest for each proposal that they are asked to examine at the moment of the evaluation.
Poleg tega morajo vsi strokovnjaki za vsak posamezen predlog, ki ga morajo preučiti v obdobju ocenjevanja, izjaviti, da niso v navzkrižju interesov.
The declaration makes a distinction between “disqualifying” and “potential” conflicts of interest.
Izjava razlikuje med ‚izključitvenim‘ in ‚morebitnim‘ navzkrižjem interesov.
When a disqualifying conflict of interest is reported by the expert or established by the Commission on the basis of any available source of information, the expert shall not evaluate the proposal concerned (consensus group), nor take part in any panel review (including possible hearings) where the proposal is under consideration [25].
Če strokovnjak poroča o izključitvenem navzkrižju interesov oziroma ga ugotovi Komisija na podlagi razpoložljivih virov informacij, strokovnjak ne sme oceniti zadevnega predloga (skupina za doseganje soglasja) niti ne sme sodelovati pri pregledu v okviru odbora (vključno z morebitnimi zaslišanji), na katerem se presoja o predlogu [25].
Experts who are employed by one of the applicant organisations in a proposal are normally considered as facing a “disqualifying” conflict of interest.
Za strokovnjake, ki so zaposleni pri eni od organizacij prijaviteljic v predlogu, se običajno šteje, da se soočajo z ‚izključitvenim‘ navzkrižjem interesov.
However, when justified by the requirement to appoint the best available experts and by the limited size of the pool of qualified experts, the Commission may decide to invite such experts to take part in the panel review session, if the expert works in a different department/laboratory/institute from the one where the work is to be carried out, and if the constituent bodies operate with a high degree of autonomy.
Kadar pa potreba po imenovanju najboljših razpoložljivih strokovnjakov in omejen nabor usposobljenih strokovnjakov to upravičujeta, se Komisija lahko odloči, da take strokovnjake povabi k sodelovanju pri pregledu v okviru odbora, če strokovnjak dela v drugem oddelku/laboratoriju/inštitutu, ne v tistem, kjer se bo opravljalo delo, in če organi v sestavi delujejo z visoko stopnjo neodvisnosti.
In this case, the expert shall abstain from the discussion (or electronic forum) if the panel discusses in detail the proposal involving the organisation concerned.
V tem primeru se strokovnjak vzdrži sodelovanja pri razpravi (ali elektronskem forumu), ko odbor podrobneje razpravlja o predlogu, ki vključuje zadevno organizacijo.
Such experts will not take part in any hearings, if the proposal concerned reaches the hearing stage.
Taki strokovnjaki ne sodelujejo pri zaslišanjih, če zadevni predlog doseže to stopnjo.
In exceptional duly justified cases, experts in the circumstances described above may also participate in the consensus group for the proposal in question.
V izrednih ustrezno utemeljenih primerih lahko strokovnjaki v zgoraj opisanih okoliščinah sodelujejo tudi v skupini za doseganje soglasja za obravnavani predlog.
The Commission will inform the other experts in the group of the affiliation of the expert concerned.
Komisija bo druge strokovnjake v skupini obvestila o pripadnosti zadevnega strokovnjaka.
When a potential conflict of interest is reported by the expert or brought to the attention of the Commission by any means, the Commission will consider the circumstances of the case and will decide, on the basis of the objective elements of information at its disposal, on the existence of an effective conflict of interest [26].
Če strokovnjak poroča o morebitnem navzkrižju interesov oziroma je bila Komisija o tem kako drugače obveščena, bo Komisija preučila okoliščine primera in se na podlagi objektivnih razpoložljivih informacij odločila, ali gre za učinkovito navzkrižje interesov [26].
If such an effective conflict is established, the expert will be excluded in the same manner as for a disqualifying conflict.
Če se ugotovi učinkovito navzkrižje interesov, bo strokovnjak izključen tako kot pri izključitvenem navzkrižju.
In other cases, depending on the specific circumstances of the case and taking due account of the associated risks, the Commission may decide to allow the expert to evaluate.
V drugih primerih, glede na posebne okoliščine primera in ob pravilnem upoštevanju povezanih tveganj, Komisija strokovnjaku lahko dovoli, da opravi ocenjevanje.
The expert must sign a declaration confirming that they will act in an impartial manner.
Strokovnjak mora podpisati izjavo, ki potrjuje, da bo deloval nepristransko.
The Commission may take any appropriate measures to prevent a conflict of interest.
Komisija lahko sprejme vse ustrezne ukrepe za preprečitev navzkrižja interesov.
The role of the expert may be restricted to the panel review.
Vloga strokovnjaka je lahko omejena na pregled v okviru odbora.
In this case, the expert shall leave the room (or electronic forum) if the panel discusses the individual case of the proposal where any conflict exists.
V tem primeru strokovnjak zapusti prostor (ali elektronski forum), ko odbor razpravlja o posameznem predlogu, pri katerem obstaja tako navzkrižje.
If a hitherto unsuspected conflict becomes apparent during the course of the evaluation, the expert must announce the fact immediately to a Commission official.
Če se med ocenjevanjem pokaže do takrat neznano navzkrižje interesov, mora strokovnjak to dejstvo nemudoma sporočiti uradniku Komisije.
If the conflict is found to be a disqualifying one, the expert must abstain from further evaluation involving the proposal concerned.
Če se ugotovi, da je bilo navzkrižje interesov izključitveno, se mora strokovnjak vzdržati nadaljnjega ocenjevanja, ki se nanaša na zadevni predlog.
Any comments and scores made earlier by that expert for the proposal concerned will be discounted.
Vse pripombe in ocene, ki jih je ta strokovnjak že predložil, se ne upoštevajo.
If necessary, the expert will be replaced.
Po potrebi se strokovnjak zamenja.
If an expert knowingly conceals a disqualifying or potential conflict of interest, and this is discovered during the evaluation, the expert will be immediately excluded, and the sanctions indicated in the appointment letter and/or in the Financial Regulation and its implementing rules will apply.
Če strokovnjak zavestno prikrije izključitveno ali morebitno navzkrižje interesov, kar se ugotovi med postopkom ocenjevanja, se nemudoma izključi, uporabijo pa se sankcije, predvidene v obvestilu o imenovanju in/ali v Finančni uredbi in njenih izvedbenih predpisih.
Any consensus group in which he or she has participated will be declared null and void, and the proposal(s) concerned will be re-evaluated.
Vse skupine za doseganje soglasja, v katerih je ta strokovnjak sodeloval, se razglasijo za nične in neveljavne, zadevni predlog(-i) pa se znova oceni(-jo).
By analogy with Article 265a§3 of Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation, a breach of the code of conduct or other serious misconduct by the expert may be qualified as grave professional misconduct and may lead to the exclusion of this expert from the list drawn up following the call for expression of interest provided for in Article 179a of the Financial Regulation.
Po analogiji z odstavkom 3 člena 265(a) izvedbenih predpisov k Finančni uredbi se kršitev kodeksa ravnanja ali druge resne kršitve, ki jih zagreši strokovnjak, lahko obravnavajo kot hujša kršitev poklicnega ravnanja, kar lahko povzroči izključitev strokovnjaka s seznama, ki je bil sestavljen po pozivu za izjavo interesa, določenem v členu 179(a) Finančne uredbe.
Pursuant to such exclusion, the expert will be removed from the database and barred from re-registering for the duration of the exclusion.
Po taki izključitvi se strokovnjak izbriše iz podatkovne zbirke in se ne sme ponovno registrirati, dokler traja izključitev.
With a view to ensuring a high degree of transparency, the Commission may appoint independent experts to act as observers (hereafter “observers”) of the evaluation process from the point of view of its working and execution.
Zaradi zagotavljanja visoke stopnje preglednosti Komisija lahko imenuje neodvisne strokovnjake, ki bodo delovali kot opazovalci (v nadaljnjem besedilu: opazovalci) ocenjevalnega postopka z vidika njegovega delovanja in izvedbe.
Their role is to give independent advice to the Commission on the conduct and fairness of all phases of the evaluation sessions, on ways in which the expert evaluators apply the evaluation criteria, and on ways in which the procedures could be improved.
Njihova vloga je neodvisno svetovanje Komisiji o ravnanju in poštenosti v vseh fazah ocenjevanja, o tem, kako strokovni ocenjevalci uporabljajo merila za ocenjevanje in kako bi se postopki lahko izboljšali.
As such, they shall verify that the procedures set out or referred to in these Rules are adhered to, and report their findings and recommendations to the Commission.
Preveriti morajo upoštevanje postopkov, ki so določeni ali se nanje sklicujejo ta pravila, in poročati Komisiji o svojih ugotovitvah in priporočilih.
They are also encouraged to enter into informal discussions with the Commission officials involved in the evaluation sessions and to suggest to the Commission any possible improvements that could be put into practice immediately.
Hkrati je zaželeno, da sodelujejo pri neuradnih razpravah z uradniki Komisije, ki so vključeni v posamezno ocenjevanje, in Komisiji predlagajo morebitne izboljšave, ki bi jih bilo mogoče nemudoma uporabiti v praksi.
However, in the framework of their work, they should not express views on the proposals under evaluation or the experts’ opinions on the proposals.
Vendar v okviru svojega dela ne smejo izražati svojih pogledov na predloge, ki se ocenjujejo, ali mnenj, ki jih imajo strokovnjaki o predlogih.
To this end, it is not necessary that the observers have expertise in the area of the proposals being evaluated.
Zato ni nujno, da so opazovalci strokovnjaki na področju predlogov, ki se ocenjujejo.
Indeed, it is considered advantageous to avoid having observers with too intimate knowledge of the particular S & T area in order to avoid conflicts between their opinions on the outcome of the evaluations and the functioning of the sessions.
Pravzaprav je lahko prednost, če opazovalci nimajo preveč poglobljenega znanja na posebnem znanstvenem in tehnološkem področju, da ne bi prihajalo do nasprotij med njihovimi mnenji o rezultatih ocenjevanj in izvajanjem posameznega ocenjevanja.
In any case, they will not express views on the proposals under examination or the experts’ opinions on the proposals.
Nikakor pa opazovalci ne smejo izražati svojih pogledov na predloge, ki se ocenjujejo, ali mnenj strokovnjakov o predlogih.
The observers are invited to be present from the beginning of the evaluation sessions when the experts are briefed by the Commission.
Priporočljivo je, da so opazovalci navzoči od samega začetka ocenjevanja, ko Komisija strokovnjakom poda napotke.