natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Montoro-Adamuz’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Španije za registracijo imena „Montoro-Adamuz“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
OJ C 125, 13.5.2010, p. 19.
UL C 125, 13.5.2010, str. 19.
Class 1.5.
Skupina 1.5 -
Montoro-Adamuz (PDO)
Montoro-Adamuz (ZOP)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1216/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1216/2010
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Welsh Lamb (PGI)]
o odobritvi večjih sprememb specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Welsh Lamb (ZGO))
In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission has examined the United Kingdom’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Welsh Lamb’ registered in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 [2], as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1257/2003 [3].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 9(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je Komisija proučila vlogo Združenega kraljestva za odobritev sprememb specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Welsh Lamb“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2400/96 [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1257/2003 [3].
OJ L 177, 16.7.2003, p. 3.
UL L 177, 16.7.2003, str. 3.
OJ C 112, 1.5.2010, p. 11.
UL C 112, 1.5.2010, str. 11.
Class 1.1 –
Skupina 1.1
Welsh Lamb (PGI)
Welsh Lamb (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1217/2010
on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development agreements
o uporabi člena 101(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za nekatere skupine sporazumov o raziskavah in razvoju
Having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 of the Council of 20 December 1971 on application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2821/71 z dne 20. decembra 1971 o uporabi člena 85(3) Pogodbe za skupine sporazumov, sklepov in usklajenih ravnanj [1],
Regulation (EEC) No 2821/71 empowers the Commission to apply Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2] by regulation to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices falling within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty which have as their object the research and development of products, technologies or processes up to the stage of industrial application, and exploitation of the results, including provisions regarding intellectual property rights.
Uredba (EGS) št. 2821/71 pooblašča Komisijo, da z uredbo določi uporabo člena 101(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije [2] za nekatere skupine sporazumov, sklepov in usklajenih ravnanj, ki spadajo v področje uporabe člena 101(1) Pogodbe in katerih predmet so raziskave in razvoj proizvodov, tehnologij ali postopkov do stopnje industrijske uporabe ter izkoriščanje rezultatov, vključno z določbami glede pravic intelektualne lastnine.
Article 179(2) of the Treaty calls upon the Union to encourage undertakings, including small and medium-sized undertakings, in their research and technological development activities of high quality, and to support their efforts to cooperate with one another.
Člen 179(2) Pogodbe od Unije zahteva, da spodbuja podjetja, tudi mala in srednja, pri njihovih visoko kakovostnih raziskovalnih in tehnološkorazvojnih dejavnostih in da podpira njihovo prizadevanje za medsebojno sodelovanje.
This Regulation is intended to facilitate research and development while at the same time effectively protecting competition.
Namen te uredbe je spodbujati raziskave in razvoj ter obenem učinkovito varovati konkurenco.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2659/2000 of 29 November 2000 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of research and development agreements [3] defines categories of research and development agreements which the Commission regarded as normally satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 101(3) of the Treaty.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2659/2000 z dne 29. novembra 2000 o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe za skupine sporazumov o raziskavah in razvoju [3] opredeljuje skupine sporazumov o raziskavah in razvoju, za katere je Komisija navadno štela, da izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 101(3) Pogodbe.
In view of the overall positive experience with the application of that Regulation, which expires on 31 December 2010, and taking into account further experience acquired since its adoption, it is appropriate to adopt a new block exemption regulation.
Zaradi splošne pozitivne izkušnje z uporabo navedene uredbe, ki preneha veljati 31. decembra 2010 ter ob upoštevanju dodatnih izkušenj, pridobljenih od njenega sprejetja, je smiselno sprejeti novo uredbo o skupinskih izjemah.
This Regulation should meet the two requirements of ensuring effective protection of competition and providing adequate legal security for undertakings.
Nova uredba mora izpolnjevati dve zahtevi glede zagotavljanja učinkovitega varstva konkurence in ustrezne pravne varnosti za podjetja.
The pursuit of those objectives should take account of the need to simplify administrative supervision and the legislative framework to as great an extent as possible.
Pri uresničevanju teh ciljev je treba upoštevati potrebo, da je upravni nadzor in pravni okvir treba, kolikor je mogoče, poenostaviti.
Below a certain level of market power it can in general be presumed, for the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty, that the positive effects of research and development agreements will outweigh any negative effects on competition.
Pod določeno stopnjo tržne moči je za uporabo člena 101(3) Pogodbe praviloma mogoče domnevati, da bodo pozitivni učinki sporazumov o raziskavah in razvoju prevladali nad negativnimi učinki na konkurenco.
For the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation, it is not necessary to define those agreements which are capable of falling within Article 101(1) of the Treaty.
Za določitev uporabe člena 101(3) Pogodbe z uredbo ni treba opredeliti tistih sporazumov, ki lahko spadajo v področje uporabe člena 101(1) Pogodbe.
In the individual assessment of agreements under Article 101(1) of the Treaty, account has to be taken of several factors, and in particular the market structure on the relevant market.
Pri posamičnem ocenjevanju sporazumov iz člena 101(1) Pogodbe je treba upoštevati več dejavnikov, predvsem strukturo upoštevnega trga.
Agreements on the joint execution of research work or the joint development of the results of the research, up to but not including the stage of industrial application, generally do not fall within the scope of Article 101(1) of the Treaty.
Sporazumi o skupnem izvajanju raziskovalnega dela ali skupnem razvoju rezultatov raziskav do faze industrijske uporabe, vendar ne vključno s to fazo, praviloma ne spadajo v člen 101(1) Pogodbe.
In certain circumstances, however, such as where the parties agree not to carry out other research and development in the same field, thereby forgoing the opportunity of gaining competitive advantages over the other parties, such agreements may fall within Article 101(1) of the Treaty and should therefore be included within the scope of this Regulation.
Vendar pa lahko v nekaterih okoliščinah, na primer kadar se pogodbene stranke obvežejo, da ne bodo izvajale drugih raziskav in razvoja na enakem področju, s čimer se odpovedo priložnosti, da bi pridobile konkurenčne prednosti pred drugimi pogodbenimi strankami, taki sporazumi spadajo v člen 101(1) Pogodbe in morajo biti zato vključeni v to uredbo.
The benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to those agreements for which it can be assumed with sufficient certainty that they satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty.
Ugodnost izjeme, določene s to Uredbo, naj bo omejena na sporazume, za katere je mogoče z zadostno gotovostjo domnevati, da izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 101(3) Pogodbe.
Cooperation in research and development and in the exploitation of the results is most likely to promote technical and economic progress if the parties contribute complementary skills, assets or activities to the cooperation.
Za sodelovanje pri raziskavah in razvoju ter izkoriščanju rezultatov je najbolj verjetno, da bosta spodbudila tehnični in gospodarski napredek, če sodelujoči prispevajo komplementarna znanja, sredstva ali dejavnosti.
This also includes scenarios where one party merely finances the research and development activities of another party.
To zajema tudi scenarij, ko ena od strank zgolj financira raziskave in razvoj druge stranke.
The joint exploitation of results can be considered as the natural consequence of joint research and development.
Skupno izkoriščanje rezultatov lahko razumemo kot naravno posledico skupnih raziskav in razvoja.
It can take different forms such as manufacture, the exploitation of intellectual property rights that substantially contribute to technical or economic progress, or the marketing of new products.
Pojavlja se lahko v raznih oblikah, kakršne so proizvodnja, izkoriščanje pravic intelektualne lastnine, ki znatno pripomorejo k tehničnemu in gospodarskemu napredku, ali trženje novih proizvodov.
Consumers can generally be expected to benefit from the increased volume and effectiveness of research and development through the introduction of new or improved products or services, a quicker launch of those products or services, or the reduction of prices brought about by new or improved technologies or processes.
Potrošniki lahko na splošno pričakujejo, da bodo od povečanega obsega in učinkovitosti raziskav in razvoja imeli koristi zaradi uvajanja novih ali izboljšanih proizvodov ali storitev, hitrejšega uvajanja teh proizvodov ali storitev na trg ali znižanja cen, ki ga bodo prinesli nove ali izboljšane tehnologije oziroma postopki.
In order to justify the exemption, the joint exploitation should relate to products, technologies or processes for which the use of the results of the research and development is decisive.
Da bi bila izjema utemeljena, se mora skupno izkoriščanje nanašati na proizvode, tehnologije ali postopke, za katere je uporaba rezultatov raziskav in razvoja odločilna.
Moreover, all the parties should agree in the research and development agreement that they will all have full access to the final results of the joint research and development, including any arising intellectual property rights and know-how, for the purposes of further research and development and exploitation, as soon as the final results become available.
Poleg tega bi se morale vse pogodbene stranke v sporazumu o raziskavah in razvoju sporazumeti, da bodo imele vse polni dostop do končnih rezultatov skupnih raziskav in razvoja, vključno z morebitnimi pravicami intelektualne lastnine ter strokovnim znanjem in izkušnjami, ki izhajajo iz njih, za namene nadaljnjih raziskav ali izkoriščanja, takoj ko so končni rezultati na voljo.
Access to the results should generally not be limited as regards the use of the results for the purposes of further research and development.
Dostopa do rezultatov se praviloma ne bi smelo omejiti v smislu uporabe rezultatov za namene nadaljnjih raziskav in razvoja.
However, where the parties, in accordance with this Regulation, limit their rights of exploitation, in particular where they specialise in the context of exploitation, access to the results for the purposes of exploitation may be limited accordingly.
Vendar pa je, če stranki v skladu s to uredbo omejita svoje pravice do izkoriščanja, zlasti če se pri izkoriščanju specializirata, mogoče ustrezno omejiti dostop do rezultatov za namene izkoriščanja.
Moreover, where academic bodies, research institutes or undertakings which supply research and development as a commercial service without normally being active in the exploitation of results participate in research and development, they may agree to use the results of research and development solely for the purpose of further research.
Če pri raziskavah in razvoju sodelujejo akademske ustanove, raziskovalni inštituti ali podjetja, ki opravljajo raziskave in razvoj kot poslovno storitev, ne da bi bili običajno dejavni pri izkoriščanju rezultatov, se ti lahko dogovorijo, da bodo rezultate raziskav in razvoja uporabili le za nadaljnje raziskave.
Depending on their capabilities and commercial needs, the parties may make unequal contributions to their research and development cooperation.
Pogodbene stranke lahko glede na svoje zmogljivosti in tržne potrebe k sodelovanju na področju raziskav in razvoja prispevajo v različni meri.
Therefore, in order to reflect, and to make up for, the differences in the value or the nature of the parties’ contributions, a research and development agreement benefiting from this Regulation may provide that one party is to compensate another for obtaining access to the results for the purposes of further research or exploitation.
Da bi se odrazila in nadomestila razlika v vrednosti ali naravi prispevkov pogodbenih strank, sporazum o raziskavah in razvoju, ki uživa ugodnost iz te uredbe, tako lahko predvidi, da ena pogodbena stranka drugi plača nadomestilo za dostop do rezultatov za namen nadaljnjih raziskav ali izkoriščanja.
However, the compensation should not be so high as to effectively impede such access.
Vendar pa nadomestilo ne bi smelo biti tako visoko, da bi dejansko oviralo tak dostop.
Similarly, where the research and development agreement does not provide for any joint exploitation of the results, the parties should agree in the research and development agreement to grant each other access to their respective pre-existing know-how, as long as this know-how is indispensable for the purposes of the exploitation of the results by the other parties.
Podobno bi se morale v primeru, da sporazum o raziskavah in razvoju ne predvideva skupnega izkoriščanja rezultatov, pogodbene stranke v sporazumu o raziskavah in razvoju sporazumeti o medsebojni odobritvi dostopa do svojega prej obstoječega tehničnega znanja in izkušenj, če jih druge pogodbene stranke nujno potrebujejo za izkoriščanje rezultatov.
The rates of any licence fee charged should not be so high as to effectively impede access to the know-how by the other parties.
Višina zaračunanih licenčnin ne bi smela biti tako visoka, da bi drugim pogodbenim strankam dejansko ovirala dostop do tehničnega znanja.
The exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to research and development agreements which do not afford the undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products, services or technologies in question.
Izjema, podeljena na podlagi te uredbe, bi morala biti omejena na sporazume o raziskavah in razvoju, ki podjetjem ne dajejo možnosti za izključitev konkurence glede znatnega dela zadevnih proizvodov, storitev ali tehnologij.
It is necessary to exclude from the block exemption agreements between competitors whose combined share of the market for products, services or technologies capable of being improved or replaced by the results of the research and development exceeds a certain level at the time the agreement is entered into.
Iz skupinske izjeme je treba izključiti sporazume med konkurenti, katerih skupni tržni delež za proizvode, storitve ali tehnologije, ki jih je mogoče izboljšati ali zamenjati z rezultati raziskav in razvoja, ob sklenitvi sporazuma presega neko stopnjo.
However, there is no presumption that research and development agreements are either caught by Article 101(1) of the Treaty or that they fail to satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty once the market share threshold set out in this Regulation is exceeded or other conditions of this Regulation are not met.
Vendar ni mogoče domnevati, da so sporazumi o raziskavah in razvoju bodisi zajeti v področje uporabe člena 101(1) Pogodbe bodisi, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev člena 101(3) Pogodbe, če je presežen mejni tržni delež, določen s to uredbo, ali če niso izpolnjeni drugi pogoji iz te uredbe.
In such cases, an individual assessment of the research and development agreement needs to be conducted under Article 101 of the Treaty.
V takšnih primerih je treba opraviti posamično ocenjevanje sporazuma o raziskavah in razvoju v skladu s členom 101 Pogodbe.
In order to ensure the maintenance of effective competition during joint exploitation of the results, provision should be made for the block exemption to cease to apply if the parties’ combined share of the market for the products, services or technologies arising out of the joint research and development becomes too great.
Da bi se zagotovila učinkovita konkurenca v času skupnega izkoriščanja rezultatov, bi bilo treba predvideti prenehanje veljavnosti skupinske izjeme, če postane skupni tržni delež strank za proizvode, storitve ali tehnologije, ki izhajajo iz skupnih raziskav in razvoja, prevelik.
The exemption should continue to apply, irrespective of the parties’ market shares, for a certain period after the commencement of joint exploitation, so as to await stabilisation of their market shares, particularly after the introduction of an entirely new product, and to guarantee a minimum period of return on the investments involved.
Izjema bi morala še naprej veljati, ne glede na tržne deleže pogodbenih strank, za določeno obdobje po začetku skupnega izkoriščanja, zato da se stabilizirajo tržni deleži, zlasti po uvedbi popolnoma novega proizvoda, in da se zagotovi minimalno obdobje donosa na vloženi kapital.
This Regulation should not exempt agreements containing restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of the positive effects generated by a research and development agreement.
Ta uredba ne bi smela izvzemati sporazumov, ki vsebujejo omejitve, ki niso nujne za doseganje pozitivnih učinkov, ki izhajajo iz sporazuma o raziskavah in razvoju.
In principle, agreements containing certain types of severe restrictions of competition such as limitations on the freedom of parties to carry out research and development in a field unconnected to the agreement, the fixing of prices charged to third parties, limitations on output or sales, and limitations on effecting passive sales for the contract products or contract technologies in territories or to customers reserved for other parties should be excluded from the benefit of the exemption established by this Regulation irrespective of the market share of the parties.
Sporazume, ki vsebujejo nekatere vrste hudih omejitev konkurence, kakršne so omejitve svobode pogodbenih strank, da izvajajo raziskave in razvoj na področju, ki ni povezano s sporazumom, določanje cen, ki se zaračunavajo tretjim osebam, omejitve obsega proizvodnje ali prodaje in omejitve izvajanja pasivne prodaje pogodbenih proizvodov ali pogodbenih tehnologij na ozemljih oziroma strankam, rezerviranih za druge pogodbene stranke, bi bilo načeloma treba izvzeti iz ugodnosti izjeme, uvedene s to uredbo, ne glede na tržni delež zadevnih podjetij.
In this context, field of use restrictions do not constitute limitations of output or sales, and also do not constitute territorial or customer restrictions.
V tem okviru omejitve glede področij uporabe niso niti omejitve obsega proizvodnje niti omejitve glede ozemlja ali kupcev.
The market share limitation, the non-exemption of certain agreements and the conditions provided for in this Regulation normally ensure that the agreements to which the block exemption applies do not enable the parties to eliminate competition in respect of a substantial part of the products or services in question.
Omejitev tržnega deleža, izključitev nekaterih sporazumov iz skupinske izjeme in pogoji, predvideni v tej uredbi, navadno zagotavljajo, da sporazumi, za katere velja skupinska izjema, strankam ne omogočajo, da bi izključila konkurenco glede znatnega dela zadevnih proizvodov ali storitev.
The possibility cannot be ruled out that anti-competitive foreclosure effects may arise where one party finances several research and development projects carried out by competitors with regard to the same contract products or contract technologies, in particular where it obtains the exclusive right to exploit the results vis-à-vis third parties.
Nastanka učinkov omejevanja konkurence ni mogoče izključiti, če ena stranka financira več raziskovalnih in razvojnih projektov, ki jih konkurenti izvajajo v zvezi z enakimi pogodbenimi proizvodi ali pogodbenimi tehnologijami, zlasti če ta stranka pridobi izključno pravico do izkoriščanja rezultatov v razmerju do tretjih oseb.
Therefore the benefit of this Regulation should be conferred on such paid-for research and development agreements only if the combined market share of all the parties involved in the connected agreements, that is to say, the financing party and all the parties carrying out the research and development, does not exceed 25 %.
Za takšne sporazume o plačanih raziskavah in razvoju bi bilo primerno podeliti ugodnost iz te uredbe samo, če tržni delež vseh pogodbenih strank v tako povezanih sporazumih, tj. stranke, ki zagotavlja financiranje, in vseh strank, ki opravljajo raziskave in razvoj, ne presega 25 %.
Agreements between undertakings which are not competing manufacturers of products, technologies or processes capable of being improved, substituted or replaced by the results of the research and development will only eliminate effective competition in research and development in exceptional circumstances.
Sporazumi med podjetji, ki niso konkurenti kot proizvajalci proizvodov, tehnologij ali postopkov, ki jih je mogoče izboljšati, nadomestiti ali zamenjati z rezultati raziskav in razvoja, bodo izključili učinkovito konkurenco pri raziskavah in razvoju le v izjemnih okoliščinah.
It is therefore appropriate to enable such agreements to benefit from the exemption established by this Regulation irrespective of market share and to address any exceptional cases by way of withdrawal of its benefit.
Zato je pri takih sporazumih primerno omogočiti, da izkoristijo ugodnosti izjeme, ki jo določa ta uredba, ne glede na tržni delež, in vse izjemne primere reševati z odvzemom njene pravne koristi.
The Commission may withdraw the benefit of this Regulation, pursuant to Article 29(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [4], where it finds in a particular case that an agreement to which the exemption provided for in this Regulation applies nevertheless has effects which are incompatible with Article 101(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija lahko na podlagi člena 29(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe [4] odvzame ugodnost iz te uredbe, če v posameznem primeru ugotovi, da ima sporazum, za katerega velja izjema iz te uredbe, kljub temu učinke, ki so nezdružljivi s členom 101(3) Pogodbe.
The competition authority of a Member State may withdraw the benefit of this Regulation pursuant to Article 29(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in respect of the territory of that Member State, or a part thereof where, in a particular case, an agreement to which the exemption established by this Regulation applies nevertheless has effects which are incompatible with Article 101(3) of the Treaty in the territory of that Member State, or in a part thereof, and where such territory has all the characteristics of a distinct geographic market.
Organ, pristojen za konkurenco zadevne države članice, lahko umakne ugodnost iz člena 29(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 za ozemlje te države članice ali del njenega ozemlja, če ima v posameznem primeru sporazum, za katerega veljajo izjeme uvedene s to uredbo, kljub temu učinke, ki so nezdružljivi s členom 101(3) Pogodbe, na ozemlju te države članice ali delu njenega ozemlja, ki ima vse lastnosti samostojnega geografskega trga.