natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In consequence of the above, the Commission finds that Greece has illegally implemented the aid scheme in question in breach of Article 88(3) and concludes that the measure is partially incompatible with the Treaty, particularly with Article 87(2)(b), as interpreted in the Communication of 10 October 2001,
Komisija zaradi vsega navedenega ugotavlja, da je Grčija zadevno pomoč dodelila nezakonito in v nasprotju s členom 88(3) ter da je ukrep delno nezdružljiv s Pogodbo, zlasti s členom 87(2)(b), kot je razložen v sporočilu z dne 10. oktobra 2001 –
The state aid implemented by Greece in favour of Olympic Airways for losses sustained by this air carrier due to the partial closure of airspace after the attacks of 11 September 2001 is compatible with the common market as regards the compensation paid for the days from 11 to 14 September 2001, up to the maximum amount of GRD 668783057 (about EUR 1962680).
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Grčija dodelila družbi Olympic Airways za izgube, ki jih je utrpela zaradi delnega zaprtja zračnega prostora po atentatih 11. septembra 2001, je združljiva s skupnim trgom za nadomestila, izplačana za obdobje od 11. do 14. septembra 2001, v najvišjem znesku 668783057 GRD, tj. približno 1962680 EUR.
The state aid implemented by Greece in favour of Aegean Cronus for losses sustained by this air carrier due to the partial closure of airspace after the attacks of 11 September 2001 is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Grčija dodelila družbi Aegean Cronus za izgube, ki jih je utrpela zaradi delnega zaprtja zračnega prostora po atentatih 11. septembra 2001, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
According to the notification submitted by Greece, this compensation amounts to GRD 47900000 (about EUR 140572).
V skladu z grško priglasitvijo znaša 47900000 GRD, tj. približno 140572 EUR.
Greece shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries the aid referred to in Articles 2 and 3, which was unlawfully made available to them.
Grčija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da od prejemnikov izterja nezakonito izplačani pomoči iz členov 2 in 3.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the decision.
Vračilo se opravi takoj in v skladu s postopki nacionalnega prava, če ti omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvršitev tega sklepa.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the beneficiaries until the date of its recovery.
Pomoči, ki ju je treba vrniti, vključujeta obresti od datuma, ko sta bili dani na razpolago prejemniku(-om), do datuma njunega vračila.
Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the reference rate used for calculating the grant equivalent of regional aid.
Obresti se izračunajo na podlagi referenčne mere, ki se uporablja za izračun ekvivalenta subvencije regionalne pomoči.
Within 2 months of the date on which this Decision is notified, Greece shall inform the Commission of the measures taken to comply with it.
Grčija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih za uskladitev s to odločbo.
OJ C 199, 23.8.2003, p. 3.
UL C 199, 23.8.2003, str. 3.
The English expression used in the notification.
V angleščini v priglasitvi.
See footnotes 9 and 10.
Glej opombi pod črto št. 9 in 10.
See the similar decisions concerning France (N 806/2001 of 30 January 2002), United Kingdom (N 854/2001 of 12 March 2002) and Germany (N 269/2002 of 2 July 2002), which can be consulted at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/transports.htm
Glej podobne odločbe za Francijo (N 806/2001) z dne 30. januarja 2002, Združeno kraljestvo (N 854/2001) z dne 12. marca 2002 in Nemčijo (N 269/2002) z dne 2. julija 2002, objavljene na naslednjem spletnem naslovu: http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/state_aids/transports.htm.
See the Commission’s negative decision 2003/196/EC of 11 December 2002 on state aid C 42/02 (ex N 286/02) planned by France in favour of French air carriers and extending beyond 14 September 2001 the compensation initially approved by decision N 806/2001 (OJ L 77, 24.3.2003, p. 61).See also the partially negative decision 2003/637/EC of 31 April 2003 on state aid C 65/02 (ex N 262/02) planned by Austria in favour of Austrian air carriers (OJ L 222, 5.9.2003, p. 33).
Glej negativno odločbo Komisije 2003/196/ES z dne 11. decembra 2002 o ureditvi državne pomoči C 42/02 (ex N 286/02), ki jo Francija namerava izvajati za francoske letalske družbe in katere namen je podaljšati nadomestila za stroške, sprva odobrena z odločbo N 806/2001, na obdobje po 14. septembru 2001 (UL L 77, 24.3.2003, str. 61).Glej tudi delno negativno odločbo 2003/637/ES z dne 31. aprila 2003 o ureditvi državne pomoči C 65/02 (ex N 262/02), ki jo Avstrija namerava izvajati za avstrijske letalske družbe (UL L 222, 5.9.2003, str. 33).
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments concerning the aid in question.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe glede zadevne pomoči.
This was notably the case with the airspace of the United States, which was completely closed from 11 to 14 September 2001 and was reopened only gradually starting on 15 September 2001.
To je veljalo zlasti za zračni prostor Združenih držav, ki je bil od 11. do 14. septembra 2001 popolnoma zaprt in se je postopoma odpiral za promet šele od 15. septembra 2001 dalje.
Other countries had to take similar measures for all or part of their territory.
Druge države so sprejele podobne ukrepe na celotnem ozemlju ali delu svojega ozemlja.
The Greek authorities indicated that they consulted all eligible air carriers; only three companies submitted compensation claims after all Greek air carriers were invited to do so by letters of 24 October and 5 December 2001 sent out by the local authorities.
Grški organi so navedli, da so se posvetovali z vsemi upravičenimi letalskimi družbami; zahtevek za nadomestilo so vložile samo tri družbe, potem ko so lokalni organi oblasti z dopisi z dne 24. oktobra in 5. decembra 2001 vse grške letalske družbe pozvali, naj to storijo.
One of them, Axon Airlines, ceased operating on 3 December 2001, before the compensation was paid out in July 2002; Greece decided not to pay compensation to this air carrier because the objective was to enable air carriers to continue their activities and prevent the costs suffered following the attacks from affecting them excessively.
Ena od teh družb (Axon Airlines) je prenehala poslovati 3. decembra 2001, to je pred izvedbo plačil julija 2002, zato se je Grčija odločila, da tej družbi nadomestila ne bo izplačala, saj je bil njegov namen omogočiti družbam, da še naprej opravljajo svojo dejavnost, ne da bi jih stroški, ki so jih utrpele zaradi atentatov, pretirano prizadeli.
It was indicated that the amount of the compensation was calculated by comparing traffic recorded during the specified period with that recorded by the company on the corresponding days in the previous week, with a correction for the variation noted during the corresponding period in 2000.
Pojasnjeno je, da je bil znesek nadomestila izračunan s primerjavo prometa družbe v opredeljenem obdobju in prometa iste družbe na ustrezne dneve v predhodnem tednu s popravkom za odstopanje, ugotovljeno v ustreznem obdobju v letu 2000.
The loss was calculated on the basis of the average fare for that period for each category of destination.
Izguba je bila izračunana na podlagi povprečne cene za to obdobje za vsako kategorijo destinacij.
‘The Commission considers that the costs arising directly from the closure of American airspace between 11 and 14 September 2001 are a direct consequence of the events of 11 September 2001.
Komisija meni, da so stroški, ki izhajajo neposredno iz zaprtja ameriškega zračnega prostora od 11. do 14. septembra 2001, neposredna posledica dogodkov 11. septembra 2001.
They may therefore give rise to compensation by Member States in accordance with Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty on the following conditions:
Zato države članice zanje lahko izplačajo nadomestila v skladu z določbami člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
The maximum amount of compensation, which must take account in particular both of the actual costs incurred and those avoided, is equal to the loss of revenue duly recorded during these 4 days.
Najvišji znesek nadomestila, v katerem je treba upoštevati zlasti nastale in prihranjene stroške, je enak pravilno ugotovljeni izgubi prihodkov v teh štirih dneh.
It must of course be less than four 365ths of the airline’s turnover.’
Seveda je lahko le nižji od štirih tristopetinšestdesetin prometa družbe.
The state aid implemented by Greece in favour of Olympic Airways for losses sustained by this air carrier due to the partial closure of airspace after the attacks of 11 September 2001 is incompatible with the common market as regards the compensation paid for the period following 14 September 2001.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Grčija dodelila družbi Olympic Airways za izgube, ki jih je utrpela zaradi delnega zaprtja zračnega prostora po atentatih 11. septembra 2001, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom za nadomestila, izplačana za obdobje po 14. septembru 2001.
According to the notification submitted by Greece, this compensation amounts to GRD 976216943 (about EUR 2864907).
V skladu z grško priglasitvijo znašajo 976216943 GRD, tj. približno 2864907 EUR.
on the establishment of criteria for the use by liquefied natural gas carriers of technological methods as an alternative to using low sulphur marine fuels meeting the requirements of Article 4b of Council Directive 1999/32/EC relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels as amended by Directive 2005/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the sulphur content of marine fuels
o določitvi meril za uporabo tehnoloških metod kot alternative uporabi goriva za plovila z nizko vsebnostjo žvepla za prevoznike utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 4b Direktive Sveta 1999/32/ES o zmanjšanju deleža žvepla v nekaterih vrstah tekočega goriva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2005/33/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede deleža žvepla v gorivih za plovila
(notified under document C(2010) 8753)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8753)
Having regard to the Council Directive 1999/32/EC of 26 April 1999 relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels [1] as amended by Directive 2005/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], and in particular Article 4c thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 1999/32/ES z dne 26. aprila 1999 o zmanjšanju deleža žvepla v nekaterih vrstah tekočega goriva [1], kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2005/33/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], in zlasti člena 4c Direktive,
Article 4b of the Directive requires that ships at berth in Community ports do not use, from 1 January 2010, marine fuels with a sulphur content exceeding 0,1 % by mass.
Člen 4b Direktive zahteva, da v pristaniščih Skupnosti zasidrane ladje od 1. januarja 2010 ne uporabljajo goriv za plovila z vsebnostjo žvepla, večjo od 0,1 % mase.
This requirement does not apply, however, to fuels used on board vessels employing approved emission abatement technologies in accordance with Article 4c.
Vendar ta zahteva ne velja za goriva na krovu plovil, ki uporabljajo v skladu s členom 4c odobrene tehnologije za zmanjševanje emisij.
Article 4c(4) provides that Member States may allow ships to use an approved emission abatement technology as an alternative to using sulphur marine fuels meeting the requirements of Article 4b, provided that these ships continuously achieve emission reductions which are at least equivalent to those which should be achieved through the limits on sulphur in fuel specified in the Directive.
Člen 4c(4) določa, da namesto uporabe goriv za plovila z vsebnostjo žvepla, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 4b, države članice lahko dovolijo ladjam uporabo odobrene tehnologije za zmanjševanje emisij, če te ladje trajno dosegajo zmanjšanje emisij, ki je vsaj enakovredno tistemu, ki bi bilo doseženo s spoštovanjem mejnih vrednosti žvepla v gorivu, določenih v Direktivi.
Article 4c(3) provides for the establishment of criteria for the use of technological methods by ships of all flags in enclosed ports, harbours and estuaries in the Community in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 9(2) of the Directive.
Člen 4c(3) določa merila za uporabo tehnoloških metod za ladje ne glede na zastavo v zaprtih pristaniščih, lukah in estuarijih Skupnosti v skladu s postopkom iz člena 9(2) Direktive.
These criteria are to be communicated to the IMO.
Ta merila je treba sporočiti IMO.
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) Carriers are frequently fitted with dual fuel boilers, using boil-off gas and heavy fuel oil for propulsion and cargo-related operations.
Prevozniki utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina (LNG) so pogosto opremljeni z dvojnimi kotli na gorivo, ki uporabljajo uparjeni plin in težko kurilno olje za pogon ter dejavnosti, povezane s tovorom.
In order to meet the requirements of the Directive most LNG Carriers calling at EU ports could use emission abatement technology employing a mixture of marine fuels and boil-off gas to produce sulphur emissions equal to or lower than 0,1 % sulphur fuel emissions.
Da bi se upoštevale zahteve Direktive, bi lahko večina prevoznikov LNG, ki pristanejo v pristaniščih EU, uporabila tehnologijo za zmanjševanje emisij, ki uporablja mešanico goriv za plovila in uparjeni plin, pri čemer nastajajo emisije žvepla, ki so enake ali nižje od emisij pri gorivih z 0,1 % vsebnostjo žvepla.
In the long-term, boil-off gas could be used as a primary fuel at berth, producing lower sulphur emissions than those which would be achieved through the limits on sulphur in fuel specified in the Directive.
Dolgoročno bi se uparjeni plin lahko uporabljal kot primarno gorivo v pristanišču, ki proizvaja manjše emisije žvepla od tistih, ki bi se dosegle z upoštevanjem mejnih vrednosti žvepla v gorivu, kot je določeno v Direktivi.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Regulatory Committee established in accordance with Article 9(2) of the Directive,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem regulativnega odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 9(2) Direktive –
A Liquefied Natural Gas Carrier (LNG Carrier) is a cargo ship constructed or adapted and used for the carriage in bulk of liquefied natural gas as defined under the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC) Code.
Prevoznik utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina je tovorna ladja, izdelana ali prilagojena in se uporablja za prevoz utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina, kot je opredeljeno v Mednarodnem kodeksu za gradnjo in opremo ladij za prevoz utekočinjenih plinov kot razsutega tovora.
To meet the objective on reducing emissions from ships through an alternative technological abatement method by a mixture of marine fuel and boil-off gas the LNG Carriers shall use and comply with the calculation criteria set out in Annex.
Da bi se dosegel cilj zmanjšanja emisij iz ladij z alternativno tehnološko metodo za zmanjševanje emisij z mešanico goriva za plovila in uparjenega plina, morajo prevozniki LNG uporabljati in upoštevati merila za izračun iz Priloge.
The LNG Carriers may use the alternative technological abatement method while at berth in Community ports, allowing sufficient time for the crew to accomplish any necessary measures to employ a mixture of marine fuel and boil-off gas as soon as possible after arrival at berth and as late as possible before departure.
Prevozniki LNG lahko uporabljajo alternativno tehnološko metodo za zmanjševanje emisij, ko so zasidrani v pristaniščih Skupnosti, in morajo omogočiti posadki dovolj časa, da izvede vse potrebne ukrepe za uporabo mešanice goriva za plovila in uparjenega plina čim prej po prihodu v pristanišče in čim pozneje pred odhodom.
The achieved emission reductions in sulphur emissions due to the application of the method referred to in Article 2 must be at least equivalent to the reduction that would be achieved through the limits of the sulphur in fuel specified in the Directive.
Doseženo zmanjšanje emisij žvepla zaradi uporabe metode iz člena 2 mora biti vsaj enako zmanjšanju, ki bi se doseglo z upoštevanjem mejnih vrednosti žvepla v gorivu, kot je določeno v Direktivi.
Member States shall require LNG Carriers which use the alternative technological abatement method and call at ports under their jurisdiction to provide detailed record in the ship’s log-book, containing the type and quantity of fuels used on board.
Države članice zahtevajo, da prevozniki LNG, ki uporabljajo alternativno tehnološko metodo za zmanjševanje in pristajajo v pristaniščih v njihovi pristojnosti, zagotovijo natančen zapis v ladijskem dnevniku, ki zajema vrsto in količino goriv, uporabljenih na krovu plovil.
For this purpose, these ships shall be equipped for continuous monitoring and metering of the boil-off gas and marine fuel consumption.
V ta namen so te ladje opremljene za stalno spremljanje in merjenje porabe uparjenega plina in goriva za plovila.
Member States shall take appropriate measures to monitor and verify the use of the alternative technological abatement method while at berth based on the achieved emissions reductions provided by LNG Carriers.
Države članice sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za spremljanje in preverjanje uporabe alternativne tehnološke metode za zmanjševanje emisij pri ladjah, zasidranih v pristanišču, na osnovi podatkov o doseženih manjših emisijah, ki jih zagotovijo prevozniki LNG.
Done at Brussels, 13 December 2010.
V Bruslju, 13. decembra 2010
For the purpose of establishing equivalence within the meaning of Article 3, the following formula shall be used:
Za namen vzpostavljanja enakovrednosti v smislu člena 3 se uporablja naslednja formula:
This factor shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Ta dejavnik se izračuna v skladu z naslednjo formulo:
Development 1 of the formula
razvoj formule
The two formulas referred to above can be combined as follows:
Zgoraj navedeni formuli se lahko združita, kot sledi:
Development 2 of the formula
razvoj formule
The formula can be further developed as follows:
Formula se lahko razvije naprej, kot sledi:
This second development can also be expressed in the following way:
Drugi razvoj se lahko izrazi tudi na naslednji način:
Application of the formula
Uporaba formule
Since the energy values of the different marine fuels involved in the formula are largely similar, it is justified to use standard values for EF0,1 %, EF and EBOG in order to simplify the application of the formula in practice.
Ker so energetske vrednosti različnih v formulo vključenih goriv za plovila zelo podobne, je upravičeno uporabiti standardne vrednosti za EF0,1 %, EF in EBOG, da bi se v praksi poenostavila uporaba formule.
More particularly, the following standard energy values may be presumed to apply:
Natančneje, naslednje standardne energetske vrednosti se lahko uporabijo:
43,0 MJ/kg (source: DNV Petroleum Services)
43,0 MJ/Kg (vir: Petroleum Services DNV)
40,8 MJ/kg (source: DNV Petroleum Services)
40,8 MJ/Kg (vir: Petroleum Services DNV)
50,0 MJ/kg (ISO energy figure for methane)
50,0 MJ/Kg (energetska vrednost za metan ISO)
The formula would accordingly be simplified as follows:
Zato bi se formula poenostavila, kot sledi:
On this basis, the only value that needs to be introduced to the formula to arrive at the required ratio between the mass of boil-off gas and marine fuel consumed (RG/F or MBOG/MF) is the sulphur content of the marine fuel used while at berth.
Na tej osnovi je edina vrednost, ki jo je treba uvesti v formulo, da se pridobi zahtevano razmerje med maso porabljenega uparjenega plina in goriva za plovila (RG/F ali MBOG/MF), vsebnost žvepla uporabljenega goriva za plovila v pristanišču.
By means of examples, the table below indicates the minimum ratio required to meet the equivalence criteria for marine fuels with different sulphur contents.
Spodnja tabela s primeri prikazuje najmanjše potrebno razmerje za spoštovanje meril enakovrednosti za goriva za plovila z različno vsebnostjo žvepla.
Sulphur content (%)
Vsebnost žvepla (%)
percentage of sulphur content per unit of mass of the marine fuel used,
odstotek vsebnosti žvepla na enoto mase uporabljenega goriva za plovila
mass of the marine fuel consumed while the ship is at berth in kg,
masa porabljenega goriva za plovila, ko je ladja zasidrana, v kg
equivalent mass in kg of a fuel with a sulphur content ≤ 0,1 %.
enakovredna masa v kg goriva z vsebnostjo žvepla ≤ 0,1 %.
mass of the boil-off gas consumed at berth in kg,
masa uparjenega plina, porabljenega v pristanišču, v kg
energy value of the boil-off gas used in MJ/kg,
energetska vrednost uporabljenega uparjenega plina v MJ/Kg
mass of the marine fuel consumed at berth in kg,
masa goriva za plovila, porabljenega v pristanišču, v kg
energy value of the marine fuel used in MJ/kg.
energetska vrednost uporabljenega goriva za plovila v MJ/Kg
energy value of a marine fuel with a sulphur content ≤ 0,1 % in MJ/kg
energetska vrednost goriva za plovila z vsebnostjo žvepla ≤ 0,1 % v MJ/Kg
the ratio between the mass of boil-off gas and marine fuel consumed at berth (MBOG/MF)
razmerje med maso uparjenega plina in goriva za plovila, porabljenega v pristanišču (MBOG/MF)
E F0,1 %
E F0.1 %
amending Decision 2009/980/EU as regards the conditions of use of an authorised health claim on the effect of water-soluble tomato concentrate on platelet aggregation
o spremembi Sklepa 2009/980/EU v zvezi s pogoji uporabe odobrenih zdravstvenih trditev glede učinka v vodi topnega paradižnikovega koncentrata na agregacijo trombocitov
(notified under document C(2010) 8828)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 8828)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods [1], and in particular Articles 18(4) and 19 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih [1] ter zlasti člena 18(4) in člena 19 Uredbe,
Following the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), hereinafter referred to as the Authority, on the effects of Water-Soluble Tomato Concentrate (WSTC) I and II on the blood platelet activity in healthy people (Question No EFSA-Q-2009-00229) [2], the health claim stating that Water-Soluble Tomato Concentrate (WSTC) I and II ‘helps maintain normal platelet aggregation, which contributes to healthy blood flow’ was authorised by Commission Decision 2009/980/EU [3].
V skladu z mnenjem Evropske agencije za varnost hrano (EFSA) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) o učinkih v vodi topnega paradižnikovega koncentrata (WSTC) I in II na dejavnost trombocitov v krvi zdravih ljudi (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2009-00229) [2], je bila zdravstvena trditev, da v vodi topni paradižnikov koncentrat (WSTC) I in II „pomaga pri ohranjanju normalne agregacije trombocitov, ki je pomembna za zdrav krvni obtok“, odobrena s Sklepom Komisije 2009/980/EU [3].
Pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, Decision 2009/980/EU included the following condition of use of that health claim: ‘Information to the consumer that the beneficial effect is obtained with a daily consumption of 3 g WSTC I or 150 mg WSTC II in up to 250 ml of either fruit juices, flavoured drinks or yogurt drinks (unless heavily pasteurised)’.
V skladu s členom 16(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 je Sklep 2009/980/EU vključeval naslednji pogoj uporabe navedene zdravstvene trditve: „Informacija potrošniku, da se koristni učinek doseže z dnevnim uživanjem 3 g v vodi topnega paradižnikovega koncentrata I ali 150 mg v vodi topnega paradižnikovega koncentrata II v do 250 ml sadnih sokov, aromatiziranih pijač ali jogurtovih napitkov (če niso močno pasterizirani)“.