natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the other hand, the market share of the dumped imports increased from 0,4 % to 7,1 % in the same period of time.
Na drugi strani se je v istem obdobju tržni delež dampinškega uvoza povečal z 0,4 % na 7,1 %.
It is thus concluded that the Union producers could not benefit from any growth of the market.
Zato se sklene, da proizvajalci Unije niso mogli izkoristiti rasti trga.
The employment level of the Union producers shows a decrease of 15 % between 2006 and the IP.
Stopnja zaposlenosti proizvajalcev Unije se je med letom 2006 in OP znižala za 15 %.
More specifically, the number of people employed decreased significantly from 2400 in 2006 to 2100 in 2007 or by 13 % and remained close to this level in 2008 and in the IP.
Natančneje, število zaposlenih se je znatno zmanjšalo z 2400 leta 2006 na 2100 leta 2007, tj. za 13 %, pri čemer se leta 2008 in v OP ta stopnja ni bistveno spremenila.
The drop in 2007 is a reflection of the restructuring efforts by a number of EU producers.
Zmanjšanje leta 2007 izraža prizadevanje več proizvajalcev EU za prestrukturiranje.
Productivity of the Union producers’ workforce, measured as output (tonnes) per person employed per year, increased by 12 % in the period considered.
Produktivnost delovne sile proizvajalcev Unije, merjene s proizvodnjo (v tonah) na zaposleno osebo na leto, se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 12 %.
This reflects the fact that production decreased at a lower pace than the employment level and is an indication of increased efficiency by the Union producers.
To izraža dejstvo, da se je proizvodnja zmanjšala počasneje kot stopnja zaposlenosti, in kaže na povečano učinkovitost proizvajalcev Unije.
This is particularly obvious in 2007 when production increased while the employment level decreased and the productivity was 21 % higher than in 2006.
To je zlasti očitno v letu 2007, ko se je proizvodnja povečala, medtem ko se je stopnja zaposlenosti znižala, pri čemer je bila produktivnost za 21 % večja kot leta 2006.
Factors affecting sales prices
Dejavniki, ki vplivajo na prodajne cene
The annual average sales prices of the Union producers on the EU market to unrelated customers remained stable between 2006 and 2008 at around 1100 EUR per tonne.
Letne povprečne prodajne cene proizvajalcev Unije na trgu EU, ki se zaračunavajo nepovezanim strankam, so med letoma 2006 in 2008 ostale stabilne pri približno 1100 EUR na tono.
In the IP the annual average sale price decreased by 12 % and reached 977 EUR per tonne.
V OP se je letna povprečna prodajna cena znižala za 12 % in dosegla 977 EUR na tono.
The annual average sales price does not reflect the monthly or even daily price fluctuations of the PET on the European (and world) market, but is considered sufficient to show the trend during the period considered.
Letna povprečna prodajna cena ne izraža mesečnih ali celo dnevnih nihanj cen PET na evropskem (in svetovnem) trgu, vendar zadostuje za ugotavljanje trenda v obravnavanem obdobju.
The sales prices of PET normally follow the price trends of its main raw materials (mainly PTA and MEG) as they constitute up to 80 % of the total cost of PET.
Prodajne cene PET so običajno v skladu s cenovnimi trendi njegovih glavnih surovin (predvsem PTA in MEG), saj predstavljajo do 80 % celotnih stroškov PET.
Unit price EU market (EUR/ton)
Cena na enoto na trgu EU (EUR/tona)
As indicated above, the sales prices of the Union industry were undercut by the dumped imports from UAE and Iran.
Kot je navedeno, so bile prodajne cene industrije Unije nelojalno znižane zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz ZAE in Irana.
Given the volume, market share and prices of the imports from the UAE and Iran, the impact on the Union industry of the actual margins of dumping cannot be considered to be negligible.
Glede na obseg, tržni delež in cene uvoza iz ZAE in Irana vpliva dejanskih stopenj dampinga na industrijo Unije ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanemarljivega.
It is important to recall that since 2000, there have been anti-dumping measures in force against imports of PET from India, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand and since 2004 against the People's Republic of China.
Opozoriti je treba, da se od leta 2000 izvajajo protidampinški ukrepi proti uvozu PET iz Indije, Indonezije, Republike Koreje, Malezije, Tajvana in Tajske, od leta 2004 pa proti uvozu PET iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Given that in the period considered by this investigation the Union industry lost market share and increased their losses, no actual recovery from the past dumping can be established and it is considered that Union production remains vulnerable to the injurious effect of any dumped imports in the Union market.
Glede na to, da se je v obravnavanem obdobju preiskave zmanjšal tržni delež industrije Unije, njene izgube pa so se povečale, ni mogoče določiti dejanskega okrevanja od preteklega dampinga, pri čemer se sklene, da je proizvodnja Unije še naprej dovzetna za škodljive učinke kakršnega koli dampinškega uvoza na trg Unije.
Microeconomic elements
Mikroekonomski elementi
The level of closing stocks of the sampled producers decreased between 2006 and the IP by 22 %.
Raven končnih zalog vzorčenih proizvajalcev se je med letom 2006 in OP znižala za 22 %.
It is noted that the stocks represent less than 5 % of the annual production and therefore the relevance of this indicator in the injury analysis is limited.
Opozoriti je treba, da zaloge predstavljajo manj kot 5 % letne proizvodnje, zato je pomembnost tega kazalca pri analizi škode omejena.
Source: questionnaire replies.
Vir: izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Annual labour cost (EUR)
Letni stroški dela (EUR)
During the period considered, the profitability of the sampled producers’ sales of the like product on the EU market to unrelated customers, expressed as a percentage of net sales, remained negative and even dropped from – 6,9 % to – 7,5 %.
Dobičkonosnost prodaje podobnega izdelka vzorčenih proizvajalcev nepovezanim strankam na trgu EU, izražena kot odstotek neto prodaje, je v obravnavanem obdobju ostala negativna in se celo zmanjšala z – 6,9 % na – 7,5 %.
More specifically, the situation with regard to profitability of the sampled producers improved in 2007 when net losses accounted only – 1,5 % of net sales, but losses increased sharply in 2008 to – 9,3 %.
Natančneje, položaj v zvezi z dobičkonosnostjo vzorčenih proizvajalcev se je leta 2007 izboljšal, saj so neto izgube predstavljale le – 1,5 % neto prodaje, vendar so se leta 2008 izgube zelo povečale, in sicer na – 9,3 %.
The situation slightly improved in the IP.
V OP se je položaj nekoliko izboljšal.
Profitability of EU (% of net sales)
Dobičkonosnost EU (% neto prodaje)
ROI (profit in % of net book value of investments)
Donosnost naložb (dobiček v % neto knjigovodske vrednosti naložb)
The return on investments (‘ROI’), expressed as the profit in percent of the net book value of investments, broadly followed the profitability trend.
Donosnost naložb, izražena kot dobiček v odstotkih neto knjigovodske vrednosti naložb, je bila na splošno v skladu s trendom dobičkonosnosti.
Overall, the return on investments remained negative and deteriorated by 2,7 percentage points over the period considered.
Donosnost naložb je na splošno ostala negativna in se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 2,7 odstotne točke.
The net cash flow from operating activities was negative at – 18,5 million EUR in 2006. It improved significantly in 2007 when it became positive at 19,5 million EUR, but deteriorated massively in 2008 (– 42 million EUR) before reaching the negative – 11 million EUR in the IP. Overall, cash flow improved in the period considered although it remained negative.
Neto denarni tok iz poslovanja je bil leta 2006 negativen, in sicer – 18,5 milijona EUR. Leta 2007 se je znatno izboljšal, ko je z 19,5 milijona EUR dosegel pozitivno raven, vendar se je leta 2008 zelo zmanjšal (– 42 milijonov EUR), nato pa je v OP dosegel – 11 milijonov EUR. Denarni tok se je v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno izboljšal, čeprav je ostal negativen.
There were no indications that the Union industry encountered difficulties in raising capital, mainly due to the fact that some of the producers are incorporated in larger groups.
Ni dokazov, da bi imela industrija Unije težave pri zbiranju kapitala, zlasti zato, ker so nekateri proizvajalci vključeni v večje skupine.
This sharp drop in investments can be partially explained by the fact that in 2006 and 2007 new production lines were acquired aiming at increasing capacity.
To znatno zmanjšanje naložb je mogoče delno pojasniti z dejstvom, da so bile leta 2006 in 2007 pridobljene nove proizvodne linije za povečanje zmogljivosti.
The analysis of the macroeconomic data show that the Union producers decreased their production and sales during the period considered.
Analiza makroekonomskih podatkov kaže, da sta se proizvodnja in prodaja proizvajalcev Unije v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšali.
Although the observed decrease was not dramatic as such, it needs to be seen in the context of increased demand between 2006 and the IP, which resulted in the Union producers’ market share dropping by 10 percentage points to 75 %.
Čeprav ugotovljeno zmanjšanje kot tako ni bilo dramatično, ga je treba obravnavati v okviru povečanega povpraševanja med letom 2006 in OP, ki je povzročilo zmanjšanje tržnega deleža proizvajalcev Unije za 10 odstotnih točk, tj. na 75 %.
At the same time the relevant microeconomic indicators show a clear deterioration of the economic situation of the sampled Union producers.
Hkrati zadevni mikroekonomski kazalci kažejo na jasno poslabšanje gospodarskega položaja vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
The profitability and return on investment remained negative and they overall declined further between 2006 and the IP.
Dobičkonosnost in donosnost naložb sta ostali negativni ter sta se med letom 2006 in OP na splošno še dodatno zmanjšali.
The cash flow, despite an overall positive development, also remained negative in the IP.
Denarni tok je kljub splošnemu pozitivnemu gibanju v OP prav tako ostal negativen.
In the light of the foregoing, it is provisionally concluded that the Union industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno se začasno sklene, da je industriji Unije nastala znatna škoda v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 3(6) and Article 3(7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the dumped imports originating in Iran and the United Arab Emirates have caused injury to the Union industry to a degree that enables it to be classified as material.
Komisija je v skladu s členoma 3(6) in (7) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je dampinški uvoz s poreklom iz Irana in Združenih arabskih emiratov industriji Unije povzročil takšno škodo, da jo je mogoče opredeliti kot znatno.
Known factors other than the dumped imports, which could at the same time have injured the Union industry, were also examined to ensure that possible injury caused by these other factors was not attributed to the dumped imports.
Poleg dampinškega uvoza so bili proučeni tudi drugi znani dejavniki, ki bi lahko istočasno povzročili škodo industriji Unije, s čimer se je zagotovilo, da se morebitna škoda zaradi teh drugih dejavnikov ni pripisala dampinškemu uvozu.
Between 2006 and the IP, the volume of the dumped imports of the product concerned originating in the UAE and Iran increased by almost 20 times to 212200 tonnes, and their market share increased by almost 7 percentage points (from 0,4 % to 7,1 %).
Obseg dampinškega uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz ZAE in Irana se je med letom 2006 in OP povečal za skoraj dvajsetkrat, in sicer na 212200 ton, pri čemer se je njegov tržni delež povečal za skoraj 7 odstotnih točk (z 0,4 % na 7,1 %).
At the same time, the Union industry lost some 10 percentage points of market share (from 84,9 % to 75,1 %).
Hkrati se je tržni delež industrije Unije zmanjšal za približno 10 odstotnih točk (s 84,9 % na 75,1 %).
The average price of these imports decreased between 2006 and the IP and remained lower than the average price of Union producers.
Povprečna cena tega uvoza se je med letom 2006 in OP znižala ter je ostala nižja od povprečne cene proizvajalcev Unije.
As indicated above at recital (62), price undercutting of the dumped imports was 3,9 % in case of the UAE and 3,2 % for Iran.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (62), je bilo nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz ZAE 3,9-odstotno, zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz Irana pa 3,2-odstotno.
Even if the price undercutting was below 4 %, it cannot be considered as insignificant given that PET is a commodity and competition takes place mainly via price.
Čeprav je bilo nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen pod 4 %, ga ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanemarljivega, ker je PET osnovni izdelek in konkurenca temelji predvsem na cenah.
The Iranian exporter claimed that Iranian PET imports could not have caused material injury to the Union industry in view of the fact that these import levels would only marginally exceed the de minimis threshold for imports.
Iranski izvoznik je trdil, da iranski uvoz PET ni mogel povzročiti znatne škode industriji Evropske unije zaradi tega, ker so uvozne ravni le malo presegle prag de minimis za uvoz.
However, during the IP, imports from Iran, corresponding to a market share of 1.9 %, exceeded the de minimis threshold specified in the basic Regulation.
Vendar je v OP uvoz iz Irana, ki je enak tržnemu deležu 1,9 %, presegel prag de minimis, določen v osnovni uredbi.
In addition, Iranian import prices were undercutting the Union industry's sales prices.
Poleg tega so iranske uvozne cene nelojalno znižale prodajne cene evropske industrije.
Against this background, the argument raised by the Iranian exporter is rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se utemeljitev iranskega izvoznika zavrne.
In view of the undercutting of Union industry's prices by imports from the UAE and Iran, it is considered that these dumped imports exerted a downward pressure on prices, preventing the Union industry from keeping its sales prices to a level that would have been necessary to cover its costs and to realise a profit.
V zvezi z nelojalnim nižanjem prodajnih cen industrije Unije zaradi uvoza iz ZAE in Irana se sklene, da se je s tem dampinškim uvozom izvajal pritisk z zniževanjem cen, zaradi česar industrija Unije svojih prodajnih cen ni mogla ohraniti na ravni, ki bi bila potrebna za kritje stroškov in ustvarjanje dobička.
Therefore, it is considered that a causal link exists between those imports and the Union industry's injury.
Zato se sklene, da obstaja vzročna zveza med navedenim uvozom in škodo industrije Unije.
One interested party claimed that any injury was due to the poor export activity of the Union producers.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je škodo povzročil nezadosten izvoz proizvajalcev Unije.
As it can be seen from the table below, the volume of exports of the Union industry increased during the period considered by 11 %.
Kot je razvidno iz spodnje preglednice, se je obseg izvoza industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 11 %.
The level of export prices over the same period decreased by 10 % which resulted in stable export sales value during the period considered.
Raven izvoznih cen se je v istem obdobju znižala za 10 %, zaradi česar je bila v obravnavanem obdobju vrednost izvoza stabilna.
Consequently, there is no indication that the export performance contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Zato ni dokazov, da je k škodi, ki je bila povzročena industriji Unije, prispeval izvoz.
Export sales (EUR)
Izvoz (EUR)
Price of exports (EUR/ton)
Izvozna cena (EUR/tona)
Another interested party claimed that the prices of the Union industry on the EU market were artificially high.
Druga zainteresirana stran je trdila, da so cene industrije Unije na trgu EU umetno visoke.
According to the interested party, this claim is evidenced by the fact that prices on the EU market remained stable whereas export sales prices have dropped.
Po mnenju zainteresirane stranke je ta trditev podprta z dejstvom, da se cene na trgu EU niso spremenile, čeprav so se izvozne prodajne cene znižale.
However, the investigation has shown that the annual average sales prices of the Union industry on the EU market decreased by 12 % over the period considered, in line with the decrease in export prices over the same period.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da so se letne povprečne prodajne cene industrije Unije na trgu EU v obravnavanem obdobju znižale za 12 %, v skladu z znižanjem izvoznih cen v istem obdobju.
The argument is thus rejected.
Ta utemeljitev se zato zavrne.
Considering that the imports from Pakistan were found not to be dumped, it is necessary to analyse if they nevertheless contributed to the injury suffered by the Union producers.
Ob upoštevanju ugotovitve, da uvoz iz Pakistana ni dampinški, je treba proučiti, ali je kljub temu prispeval k škodi, ki je nastala proizvajalcem Unije.
The volume of imports from Pakistan increased twofold in the period considered.
Obseg uvoza iz Pakistana se je v obravnavanem obdobju podvojil.
More specifically, they decreased between 2006 and 2007 by 25 % but then increased significantly in 2008 compared to 2007 by 117 percentage points and in the IP by a further 16 percentage points compared to 2008 reaching 92000 tonnes.
Natančneje, med letoma 2006 in 2007 se je zmanjšal za 25 %, vendar se je nato leta 2008 v primerjavi z letom 2007 bistveno povečal, in sicer za 117 odstotnih točk, v OP pa se je v primerjavi z letom 2008 povečal za dodatnih 16 odstotnih točk in dosegel 92000 ton.
The corresponding market share held by these imports increased from 1,6 % in 2006 to 3,1 % in the IP.
Ustrezen tržni delež tega uvoza se je povečal z 1,6 % v letu 2006 na 3,1 % v OP.
Volume of imports from Pakistan (tonnes)
Obseg uvoza iz Pakistana (v tonah)
Market share of imports from Pakistan
Tržni delež uvoza iz Pakistana
Price of imports (EUR/ton)
Uvozna cena (EUR/tona)
The average price of the Pakistani imports remained in general below the average prices of the Union producers.
Povprečna cena pakistanskega uvoza je bila na splošno nižja od povprečnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
However, the detailed analysis of the price information provided by the cooperating exporter in Pakistan showed that its prices undercut the Union prices by less than 1,5 %, i.e. less than half the undercutting established for dumped imports from Iran and the UAE.
Vendar je podrobna analiza informacij o cenah, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči izvoznik v Pakistanu, pokazala, da so njegove cene nelojalno znižale prodajne cene Unije za manj kot 1,5 %, tj. za manj kot polovico nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, ki je bilo ugotovljeno za dampinški uvoz iz Irana in ZAE.
Consequently, although it cannot be excluded that imports from Pakistan contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry, their contribution was only limited and could not have broken the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Čeprav ni mogoče izključiti, da je uvoz iz Pakistana prispeval k škodi, ki je nastala industriji Unije, je bil ta prispevek omejen in ni mogel prekiniti vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom in škodo, ki je nastala industriji Unije.
The Republic of Korea is subject to anti-dumping duties since 2000.
Za Republiko Korejo od leta 2000 veljajo protidampinške dajatve.
However, two Korean companies are subject to a zero duty and the investigation established that imports from the Republic of Korea remain at a high level and increased significantly in the period considered.
Vendar za dve korejski družbi velja dajatev nič, pri čemer je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da je uvoz iz Republike Koreje še vedno velik in da se je v obravnavanem obdobju močno povečal.
The Korean imports increased by almost 150 % between 2006 and the IP and their corresponding market share increased from 3,5 % in 2006 to 7,7 % in the IP.
Korejski uvoz se je med letom 2006 in OP povečal za skoraj 150 %, pri čemer se je ustrezen tržni delež tega uvoza povečal s 3,5 % v letu 2006 na 7,7 % v OP.
The average price of the Korean imports remained in general slightly below the average prices of the Union producers.
Povprečna cena korejskega uvoza je bila na splošno nekoliko nižja od povprečnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
However, the Korean prices were higher than the average prices from the UAE and Iran, and they were also higher than the average prices from Pakistan.
Vendar so bile korejske cene višje od povprečnih cen uvoza iz ZAE in Irana, pri čemer so bile tudi višje od povprečnih cen uvoza iz Pakistana.
Consequently, although it cannot be excluded that imports from the Republic of Korea contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry, their contribution was only limited and they are considered not to have broken the causal link established as regards the dumped imports from the UAE and Iran.
Čeprav ni mogoče izključiti, da je uvoz iz Republike Koreje prispeval k škodi, ki je nastala industriji Unije, je bil ta prispevek omejen in se sklene, da ni mogel prekiniti vzročne zveze, ugotovljene v zvezi z dampinškim uvozom iz ZAE in Irana.
The Iranian exporter claimed that any increase in Iranian imports was due to a decline in South Korean imports and therefore was not at the expense of European producers.
Iranski izvoznik je trdil, da je do kakršnega koli povečanja iranskega uvoza prišlo zaradi upada južnokorejskega uvoza in zato ta ni bil na račun evropskih proizvajalcev.
However, Eurostat data show that, over the period considered, import volumes from both countries have been increasing steadily in parallel.
Vendar podatki Eurostata kažejo, da je v obravnavanem obdobju obseg uvoza iz obeh držav vzporedno enakomerno naraščal.
Hence, it can not be concluded that imports from Iran merely substituted imports from South Korea.
Zato ni mogoče skleniti, da je uvoz iz Irana zgolj nadomestil uvoz iz Južne Koreje.
Imports from other countries were, on average, at prices substantially higher than average sales prices of the Union producers.
Cene uvoza iz drugih držav so bile v povprečju bistveno višje od povprečnih prodajnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
In addition, these imports have lost market share in the period considered.
Poleg tega se je tržni delež tega uvoza v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal.
Consequently, these imports are not considered as being a possible cause of injury for the Union industry.
Zato se ta uvoz ne šteje kot mogoč vzrok škode za industrijo Unije.
Volume of imports from other countries (tonnes)
Obseg uvoza iz drugih držav (v tonah)
Market share of imports from other countries
Tržni delež uvoza iz drugih držav
Competition from the non-cooperating producers in the Union
Konkurenca nesodelujočih proizvajalcev v Uniji
Some interested parties claimed that the injury suffered by the Union industry would be due to competition form the non-cooperating producers in the Union.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da naj bi škodo, ki je nastala industriji Unije, povzročila konkurenca nesodelujočih proizvajalcev v Uniji.
Five Union producers did not cooperate in this proceeding.
Pet proizvajalcev Unije ni sodelovalo v tem postopku.
One of them stopped its production already in the IP while two other ones did so shortly thereafter.
Eden od njih je svojo proizvodnjo ustavil že v OP, dva druga pa sta to storila kmalu po tem.
The sales volumes of non-cooperating producers have been estimated based on the information submitted in the complaint.
Obseg prodaje nesodelujočih proizvajalcev je bil ocenjen na podlagi informacij, predloženih v pritožbi.
Based on the information available, it appears that these producers lost their market share during the period considered from 20,5 % in 2006 to 16 % in the IP.
Glede na razpoložljive informacije se zdi, da se je tržni delež teh proizvajalcev v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal z 20,5 % v letu 2006 na 16 % v OP.
The investigation has not shown any evidence that the behaviour of these producers has broken the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury established for the Union industry.
S preiskavo ni bilo dokazano, da bi ravnanje teh proizvajalcev prekinilo vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in ugotovljeno škodo za industrijo Unije.