natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Consequently, the consumer should handle and inspect the goods with due care during the withdrawal period.
Potrošnik bi zato moral v odstopnem roku z blagom ravnati skrbno in ga tako tudi pregledati.
The obligations of the consumer in the event of withdrawal should not discourage the consumer from exercising his right of withdrawal.
Obveznosti v primeru odstopa od pogodbe potrošnika ne bi smele omejevati, da uveljavi svoje pravice do odstopa od pogodbe.
The consumer should be required to send back the goods not later than 14 days after having informed the trader about his decision to withdraw from the contract.
Od potrošnika bi se moralo zahtevati, da blago vrne najpozneje v 14 dneh po tem, ko je trgovca obvestil o svoji odločitvi, da odstopi od pogodbe.
In situations where the trader or the consumer does not fulfil the obligations relating to the exercise of the right of withdrawal, penalties provided for by national legislation in accordance with this Directive should apply as well as contract law provisions.
V primerih, ko trgovec ali potrošnik ne izpolnjujeta obveznosti v zvezi z uveljavljanjem pravice do odstopa od pogodbe, bi se morale uporabiti kazni, predvidene v nacionalni zakonodaji v skladu s to direktivo, ter predpisi pogodbenega prava.
Certain exceptions from the right of withdrawal should exist, both for distance and off-premises contracts.
Obstajati bi morale določene izjeme od pravice do odstopa, tako za pogodbe, sklenjene na daljavo, kot za pogodbe, sklenjene zunaj poslovnih prostorov.
A right of withdrawal could be inappropriate for example given the nature of particular goods or services.
Pravica do odstopa od pogodbe bi lahko bila neprimerna na primer zaradi narave zadevnega blaga ali storitev.
That is the case for example with wine supplied a long time after the conclusion of a contract of a speculative nature where the value is dependent on fluctuations in the market (‘vin en primeur’).
To velja na primer za vino, dobavljeno dolgo po sklenitvi pogodbe špekulativne narave, kjer je vrednost odvisna od tržnih nihanj („vin en primeur“).
The right of withdrawal should neither apply to goods made to the consumer’s specifications or which are clearly personalised such as tailor-made curtains, nor to the supply of fuel, for example, which is a good, by nature inseparably mixed with other items after delivery.
Uveljavljanje pravice do odstopa od pogodbe se ne bi smelo uporabljati niti za blago, ki je izdelano po potrošnikovih zahtevah ali ki mu je očitno prilagojeno, kot so zavese, narejene po meri, niti za dobavo goriva, ki velja za blago, ki je po dostavi zaradi svoje narave neločljivo pomešano z drugimi predmeti.
The granting of a right of withdrawal to the consumer could also be inappropriate in the case of certain services where the conclusion of the contract implies the setting aside of capacity which, if a right of withdrawal were exercised, the trader may find difficult to fill.
Odobritev pravice do odstopa od pogodbe potrošniku bi lahko bila tudi neustrezna v primeru določenih storitev, za katere sklenitev pogodbe pomeni rezervacijo zmogljivosti, ki jih lahko trgovec le stežka zapolni, če bi se uveljavljala pravica do odstopa.
This would for example be the case where reservations are made at hotels or concerning holiday cottages or cultural or sporting events.
Takšen primer bi lahko bila rezervacija hotela ali počitniške hiše ali kulturnega ali športnega dogodka.
On the one hand, the consumer should benefit from his right of withdrawal even in case he has asked for the provision of services before the end of the withdrawal period.
Potrošnik bi moral po eni strani imeti pravico do odstopa od pogodbe tudi, če je zaprosil za opravilo storitev pred koncem odstopnega roka.
On the other hand, if the consumer exercises his right of withdrawal, the trader should be assured to be adequately paid for the service he has provided.
Če pa potrošnik po drugi strani uveljavlja pravico do odstopa od pogodbe, pa bi moralo biti trgovcu zagotovljeno, da prejme ustrezno plačilo za že opravljeno storitev.
The calculation of the proportionate amount should be based on the price agreed in the contract unless the consumer demonstrates that that total price is itself disproportionate, in which case the amount to be paid shall be calculated on the basis of the market value of the service provided.
Sorazmerni znesek bi moral biti izračunan na podlagi cene iz pogodbe, razen če potrošnik dokaže, da je sama skupna cena nesorazmerna; v tem primeru se znesek, ki se plača, izračuna na podlagi tržne vrednosti opravljenih storitev.
The market value should be defined by comparing the price of an equivalent service performed by other traders at the time of the conclusion of the contract.
Tržna vrednost bi morala biti določena glede na ceno enakovrednih storitev, ki so jih v času sklenitve pogodbe izvedli drugi trgovci.
Therefore the consumer should request the performance of services before the end of the withdrawal period by making this request expressly and, in the case of off-premises contracts, on a durable medium.
Potrošnik bi moral zato zahtevati izvedbo storitev pred koncem odstopnega roka s podajo izrecne zahteve, v primeru pogodbe, sklenjene zunaj poslovnih prostorov, pa na trajnem nosilcu podatkov.
Similarly, the trader should inform the consumer on a durable medium of any obligation to pay the proportionate costs for the services already provided.
Podobno bi trgovec moral potrošnika prek trajnega nosilca podatkov obvestiti o kakršnih koli obveznostih glede plačila sorazmernih stroškov za že opravljene storitve.
For contracts having as their object both goods and services, the rules provided for in this Directive on the return of goods should apply to the goods aspects and the compensation regime for services should apply to the services aspects.
Za pogodbe, katerih predmet so tako blago kot storitve, bi morala pravila iz te direktive o vračilu blaga veljati za vidike v zvezi z blagom, za vidike v zvezi s storitvami pa bi moral veljati sistem odškodnin za storitve.
The main difficulties encountered by consumers and one of the main sources of disputes with traders concern delivery of goods, including goods getting lost or damaged during transport and late or partial delivery.
Glavne težave, s katerimi se srečujejo potrošniki, in eden izmed glavnih virov sporov s trgovci se nanašajo na dostavo blaga, vključno z blagom, ki se med prevozom izgubi ali poškoduje, ter dostave z zamudo ali delne dostave.
Therefore it is appropriate to clarify and harmonise the national rules as to when delivery should occur.
Zato je primerno pojasniti in uskladiti nacionalna pravila o tem, kdaj bi se dostava morala izvesti.
The place and modalities of delivery and the rules concerning the determination of the conditions for the transfer of the ownership of the goods and the moment at which such transfer takes place, should remain subject to national law and therefore should not be affected by this Directive.
Kraj in način dostave ter pravila o določitvi pogojev glede prenosa lastništva nad blagom in trenutka tega prenosa bi morala ostati predmet nacionalnega prava, zato ta direktiva nanje ne bi smela vplivati.
The rules on delivery laid down in this Directive should include the possibility for the consumer to allow a third party to acquire on his behalf the physical possession or control of the goods.
Pravila o dostavi iz te direktive bi morala vključevati možnost, da potrošnik tretji osebi dovoli, da v njegovem imenu fizično prevzame blago ali nadzor nad njim.
The consumer should be considered to have control of the goods where he or a third party indicated by the consumer has access to the goods to use them as an owner, or the ability to resell the goods (for example, when he has received the keys or possession of the ownership documents).
Za potrošnika bi moralo veljati, da ima nadzor nad blagom, kadar ima on sam ali tretja oseba, ki jo imenuje, do blaga dostop, ki mu zagotavlja uporabo kot lastniku, ali možnost da blago ponovno proda (na primer ko prejme ključe ali pridobi posest nad dokumenti).
In the context of sales contracts, the delivery of goods can take place in various ways, either immediately or at a later date.
V primeru prodajnih pogodb je blago lahko dostavljeno na različne načine, bodisi takoj bodisi na kasnejši datum.
If the parties have not agreed on a specific delivery date, the trader should deliver the goods as soon as possible, but in any event not later than 30 days from the day of the conclusion of the contract.
Če se pogodbeni stranki ne dogovorita o točnem datumu dostave, bi moral trgovec dostavo blaga opraviti čim prej, vsekakor pa najpozneje v 30 dneh po dnevu sklenitve pogodbe.
The rules regarding late delivery should also take into account goods to be manufactured or acquired specially for the consumer which cannot be reused by the trader without considerable loss.
Pravila glede dostave z zamudo bi morala upoštevati tudi blago, ki je proizvedeno ali nabavljeno posebej za potrošnika in ga trgovec ne more ponovno uporabiti brez znatne škode.
Therefore, a rule which grants an additional reasonable period of time to the trader in certain circumstances should be provided for in this Directive.
Zato bi moralo biti v tej direktivi pravilo, ki trgovcu v nekaterih okoliščinah zagotavlja dodaten razumen rok.
When the trader has failed to deliver the goods within the period of time agreed with the consumer, before the consumer can terminate the contract, the consumer should call upon the trader to make the delivery within a reasonable additional period of time and be entitled to terminate the contract if the trader fails to deliver the goods even within that additional period of time.
Če trgovec blaga ni dostavil znotraj roka, ki je bil dogovorjen s potrošnikom, bi moral potrošnik, preden je možno, da odpove pogodbo, trgovca opozoriti, da blago dostavi v dodatnem razumnem roku, in imeti pravico do odpovedi pogodbe, če trgovec niti v tem dodatnem roku ne zagotovi dostave blaga.
Nor should it apply in circumstances where the consumer informs the trader that delivery on a specified date is essential.
Prav tako se ne bi smelo uporabiti v okoliščinah, kadar potrošnik trgovca obvesti, da je dostava na določen dan bistvenega pomena.
For this purpose, the consumer may use the trader’s contact details given in accordance with this Directive.
Za ta namen lahko potrošnik uporabi kontaktne podatke trgovca, dane v skladu s to direktivo.
In these specific cases, if the trader fails to deliver the goods on time, the consumer should be entitled to terminate the contract immediately after the expiry of the delivery period initially agreed.
Če trgovec v teh posebnih primerih blaga ne dostavi pravočasno, bi moral biti potrošnik upravičen do odstopa od pogodbe takoj po izteku prvotno dogovorjenega dostavnega roka.
This Directive should be without prejudice to national provisions on the way the consumer should notify the trader of his will to terminate the contract.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v nacionalne določbe glede načina, v skladu s katerim bi potrošnik trgovca moral obvestiti o nameri, da od pogodbe odstopa.
In addition to the consumer’s right to terminate the contract where the trader has failed to fulfil his obligations to deliver the goods in accordance with this Directive, the consumer may, in accordance with the applicable national law, have recourse to other remedies, such as granting the trader an additional period of time for delivery, enforcing the performance of the contract, withholding payment, and seeking damages.
Poleg pravice potrošnika po tej direktivi, da odstopi od pogodbe, če trgovec ni izpolnil svojih obveznosti glede dostave blaga v skladu s to direktivo, lahko potrošnik v skladu z veljavnim nacionalnim pravom uporabi tudi druga pravna sredstva, kot so odobritev dodatnega časovnega obdobja za dostavo trgovcu, zahteva za izpolnitev pogodbe, zadržanje plačila in povrnitev škode.
In accordance with Article 52(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market [12], Member States should be able to prohibit or limit traders’ right to request charges from consumers taking into account the need to encourage competition and promote the use of efficient payment instruments.
V skladu s členom 52(3) Direktive 2007/64/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. novembra 2007 o plačilnih storitvah na notranjem trgu [12] bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da ob upoštevanju potrebe po spodbujanju konkurenčnosti in uporabe učinkovitih plačilnih instrumentov trgovcem prepovedo ali omejijo pravico do zaračunavanja nadomestil potrošnikom.
In any event, traders should be prohibited from charging consumers fees that exceed the cost borne by the trader for the use of a certain means of payment.
Trgovcem bi moralo biti v vsakem primeru prepovedano, da potrošnikom zaračunavajo stroške, ki presegajo stroške, ki jih trgovec nosi za uporabo določenega načina plačila.
Where the goods are dispatched by the trader to the consumer, disputes may arise, in the event of loss or damage, as to the moment at which the transfer of risk takes place.
Kadar trgovec potrošniku odpremi blago, lahko, v primeru izgube ali poškodbe blaga, pride do sporov glede trenutka prenosa tveganja.
Therefore this Directive should provide that the consumer be protected against any risk of loss of or damage to the goods occurring before he has acquired the physical possession of the goods.
Zato bi morala ta direktiva zagotavljati varstvo potrošnika pred vsakršnim tveganjem izgube ali poškodbe blaga, preden nad njim pridobi fizično posest.
The consumer should be protected during a transport arranged or carried out by the trader, even where the consumer has chosen a particular delivery method from a range of options offered by the trader.
Varstvo potrošnika bi moralo biti zagotovljeno med prevozom, ki ga organizira ali izvede trgovec, tudi če potrošnik med možnostmi, ki jih je ponudil trgovec, izbere poseben način dostave blaga.
However, that provision should not apply to contracts where it is up to the consumer to take delivery of the goods himself or to ask a carrier to take delivery.
Vendar se ta določba ne bi smela uporabljati za pogodbe, ki določajo, da potrošnik sam prevzame dostavo blaga ali zanjo zaprosi prevoznika.
Regarding the moment of the transfer of the risk, a consumer should be considered to have acquired the physical possession of the goods when he has received them.
V zvezi s trenutkom prenosa tveganja bi za potrošnika moralo veljati, da je nad blagom pridobil fizično posest, ko ga prevzame.
Persons or organisations regarded under national law as having a legitimate interest in protecting consumer contractual rights should be afforded the right to initiate proceedings, either before a court or before an administrative authority which is competent to decide upon complaints or to initiate appropriate legal proceedings.
Osebe ali organizacije, ki imajo po nacionalnem pravu pravni interes, da varujejo pogodbene pravice potrošnikov, bi morale imeti na voljo pravna sredstva za začetek postopka bodisi pred sodiščem bodisi pri upravnem organu, ki je pristojen za odločanje o pritožbah ali za začetek ustreznih pravnih postopkov.
It is necessary that Member States lay down penalties for infringements of this Directive and ensure that they are enforced.
Države članice morajo določiti kazni za kršitve te direktive in zagotoviti, da se izvršujejo.
The consumer should not be deprived of the protection granted by this Directive.
Potrošnik ne bi smel biti prikrajšan za varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja ta direktiva.
Where the law applicable to the contract is that of a third country, Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 should apply, in order to determine whether the consumer retains the protection granted by this Directive.
Kadar se za pogodbo uporablja pravo tretje države, bi bilo treba uporabiti Uredbo (ES) št. 593/2008, da se ugotovi, ali potrošnik ohranja varstvo v skladu s to direktivo.
The Commission, following consultation with the Member States and stakeholders, should look into the most appropriate way to ensure that all consumers are made aware of their rights at the point of sale.
Komisija bi morala po posvetovanju z državami članicami in zainteresiranimi stranmi preučiti najprimernejši način za zagotovitev, da so vsi potrošniki seznanjeni s svojimi pravicami na prodajnem mestu.
Since inertia selling, which consists of unsolicited supply of goods or provision of services to consumers, is prohibited by Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) [13] but no contractual remedy is provided therein, it is necessary to introduce in this Directive the contractual remedy of exempting the consumer from the obligation to provide any consideration for such unsolicited supply or provision.
Ker so bili z Direktivo 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah) [13] prepovedani nenaročeno blago ali storitve, sestavljeni iz nenaročene dobave blaga ali opravljanja storitev potrošnikom, vendar v zvezi s tem v direktivi ni bilo predpisano nobeno pogodbeno pravno sredstvo, je treba v to direktivo vnesti pogodbeno pravno sredstvo za oprostitev potrošnika obveznosti kakršnega koli plačila za takšno dobavo nenaročenega blaga ali izvedbo nenaročenih storitev.
Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) [14] already regulates unsolicited communications and provides for a high level of consumer protection.
Direktiva 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij (Direktiva o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah) [14] že ureja nepovabljena sporočila in zagotavlja visoko raven varstva potrošnikov.
The corresponding provisions on the same issue contained in Directive 97/7/EC are therefore not needed.
Zadevne določbe s tega področja iz Direktive 97/7/ES torej niso potrebne.
It is appropriate for the Commission to review this Directive if some barriers to the internal market are identified.
Primerno je, da Komisija to direktivo pregleda, če se ugotovijo nekatere ovire za notranji trg.
In its review, the Commission should pay particular attention to the possibilities granted to Member States to maintain or introduce specific national provisions including in certain areas of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts [15] and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees [16].
Komisija bi morala pri svojem pregledu posebno pozornost nameniti možnosti, na podlagi katerih lahko države članice ohranijo ali uvedejo posebne nacionalne določbe, tudi za posebna področja Direktive Sveta 93/13/EGS z dne 5. aprila 1993 o nedovoljenih pogojih v potrošniških pogodbah [15] in Direktive 1999/44/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. maja 1999 o nekaterih vidikih prodaje potrošniškega blaga in z njim povezanih garancij [16].
That review could lead to a Commission proposal to amend this Directive; that proposal may include amendments to other consumer protection legislation reflecting the Commission’s Consumer Policy Strategy commitment to review the Union acquis in order to achieve a high, common level of consumer protection.
Ta pregled bi lahko privedel do predloga Komisije za spremembo te direktive; ta predlog lahko vsebuje spremembe druge zakonodaje za varstvo potrošnikov kot odraz zavezanosti Komisije strategiji potrošniške politike, da pregleda pravni red Unije, da bi se dosegla visoka skupna raven varstva potrošnikov.
Directives 93/13/EEC and 1999/44/EC should be amended to require Member States to inform the Commission about the adoption of specific national provisions in certain areas.
Direktivi 93/13/EGS in 1999/44/ES bi bilo treba spremeniti tako, da bi od držav članic zahtevali, da Komisijo obvestijo o sprejetju posebnih nacionalnih določb za določena področja.
Directives 85/577/EEC and 97/7/EC should be repealed.
Direktivi 85/577/EGS in 97/7/ES bi bilo treba razveljaviti.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely, through the achievement of a high level of consumer protection, to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer prispevati k ustreznemu delovanju notranjega trga z doseganjem visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker se ta cilj lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki so priznana zlasti v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional agreement on better law-making [17], Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interests of the Union, their own tables, which will, as far as possible, illustrate the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public,
V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje [17] se države članice poziva, da za lastne potrebe in v interesu Unije pripravijo tabele, ki naj kar najbolj nazorno prikazujejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos, ter da te tabele objavijo –
SUBJECT MATTER, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE
PREDMET, OPREDELITEV POJMOV IN PODROČJE UPORABE
The purpose of this Directive is, through the achievement of a high level of consumer protection, to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by approximating certain aspects of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning contracts concluded between consumers and traders.
Namen te direktive je z doseganjem visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov prispevati k pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga, in sicer s približevanjem nekaterih vidikov zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi s pogodbami, sklenjenimi med potrošniki in trgovci.
‘consumer’ means any natural person who, in contracts covered by this Directive, is acting for purposes which are outside his trade, business, craft or profession;
„potrošnik“ pomeni vsako fizično osebo, ki v pogodbah, zajetih s to direktivo, deluje za namene, ki so zunaj njene trgovske, poslovne, obrtne ali poklicne dejavnosti;
‘trader’ means any natural person or any legal person, irrespective of whether privately or publicly owned, who is acting, including through any other person acting in his name or on his behalf, for purposes relating to his trade, business, craft or profession in relation to contracts covered by this Directive;
„trgovec“ pomeni vsako fizično osebo ali vsako pravno osebo, ne glede na to, ali je v javni ali zasebni lasti, ki deluje za namene v zvezi s trgovsko, poslovno, obrtno dejavnostjo ali poklicno dejavnostjo v povezavi s pogodbami, zajetimi s to direktivo, tudi če deluje prek osebe, ki nastopa v njegovem imenu ali po njegovem naročilu;