natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The product concerned and certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel sold on the domestic market in the PRC as well as certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel sold in the Union by the Union industry were found to have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Za zadevni izdelek in nekatere brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, prodane na domačem trgu LRK, ter nekatere brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla, ki jih industrija Unije proda v Uniji, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe.
They are therefore, provisionally considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno obravnavajo kot podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet all the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki od 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo vsa merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Ta merila so povzeta zaradi večje jasnosti:
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions and without significant State interference, and costs reflect market values;
poslovne odločitve in stroški se oblikujejo v skladu s tržnimi razmerami ter brez občutnega vmešavanja države, pri čemer stroški odražajo tržne vrednosti;
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records, which are independently audited, in line with international accounting standards and applied for all purposes;
podjetja imajo jasno določeno zbirko osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se pregledujejo neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo za vse namene;
In the present investigation, all three sampled exporting (groups of) producers requested market economy treatment (‘MET’) pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadlines.
Vsi trije vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki (skupine) so v tej preiskavi zahtevali tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in v predpisanih rokih izpolnili obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
The investigation established that none of the sampled (groups of) exporting producers in the PRC met the requirements of the criteria set forth in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, therefore they cannot be granted MET.
Pri preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da nihče od vzorčenih (skupin) proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK ni izpolnjeval meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zato jim TGO ni mogoče odobriti.
None of the companies fulfils the requirements of Criterion 1 because of State interference in decisions concerning acquisition of the main raw material (notably stainless steel billets, ingots, round bars).
Nobena od družb ne izpolnjuje zahtev prvega merila zaradi vmešavanja države v odločanje glede pridobivanja glavne surovine (zlasti drogov iz nerjavnega jekla, ingotov, okroglih palic).
Those raw materials represent well above 50 % of the cost of production of the product concerned (seamless stainless steel pipes and tubes).
Navedene surovine znašajo precej nad 50 % stroškov proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka (brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla).
Consequently, these raw materials are by far the major input in the production of the product concerned.
Posledično so te surovine daleč največji vložek pri proizvodnji zadevnega izdelka.
The Chinese State has a primary role in the setting of prices of raw materials for seamless stainless steel pipes and tubes and interferes in the market continuously with the following tools: export tax and no VAT rebate.
Kitajska država ima glavno vlogo pri določanju cen surovin za brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla in se na trg neprestano vmešava z izvoznim davkom in odsotnostjo rabata glede DDV.
First, the main raw materials to manufacture seamless stainless steel pipes and tubes, are subject to a 15 % export tax since 1 January 2008.
Kot prvo, za glavne surovine za proizvodnjo brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla od 1. januarja 2008 velja 15-odstotni izvozni davek.
Second, the State does not refund the VAT on exports of those raw materials.
Kot drugo pa država ne vrača DDV na izvoz navedenih surovin.
The sampled companies acquire their main raw materials used for the production of seamless stainless steel pipes and tubes on the Chinese domestic market.
Vzorčene družbe glavne surovine za proizvodnjo brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla na dobivajo kitajskem domačem trgu.
The investigation established that on average and depending on the steel grade the Chinese prices of the raw materials are around 30 % lower than those on the world markets (USA or EU).
Pri preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da so cene surovin na Kitajskem na splošno in odvisno od razreda jekla okoli 30 % nižje od tistih na svetovnih trgih (ZDA ali EU).
Given that the PRC has to import the majority of its iron ore at international market prices, it is clear that it does not benefit from any natural comparative advantage, which would explain the low prices of the main raw materials on the Chinese domestic market.
Glede na to, da mora LRK večino svoje železove rude uvažati po mednarodnih tržnih cenah, je jasno, da nima koristi od nobenih naravnih primerjalnih prednosti, ki bi lahko pojasnile nizke cene glavnih surovin na kitajskem domačem trgu.
At the same time and for several years, various studies point to significant State interference in this sector.
Obenem pa različne študije že več let navajajo, da se država močno vmešava v ta sektor [3].
Those reports indicate that the Chinese government has identified 14 ‘key’ industries and seven ‘pillar’ industries.
Navedena poročila kažejo, da je kitajska vlada opredelila 14 „ključnih“ industrij in sedem „podpornih“ industrij.
Primary downstream consumers of specialty steel are among the seven ‘pillar’ industries supported by the Chinese government through its industrial policies.
Glavni potrošniki specializiranega jekla s konca proizvodne verige so eni od sedmih „podpornih“ industrij, ki jih kitajska vlada podpira s svojimi industrijskimi politikami [4].
As stated in the WTO Trade Policy Reviews, export taxes and VAT rebates are policy tools whose use reduce export volumes of the raw materials in question, divert supplies to the domestic market and leads to a downward pressure on the domestic prices of those products.
Kot je navedeno v pregledih trgovinske politike STO, se z uporabo izvoznih davkov in rabatov glede DDV zmanjša obseg izvoza zadevnih surovin, preusmeri dobava na domači trg, kar vodi do nižanja domačih cen navedenih izdelkov [6].
Indeed, the current investigation established a significant price gap between domestic prices and world prices.
S trenutno preiskavo je bilo namreč ugotovljeno, da obstaja velika razlika med domačimi in svetovnimi cenami.
Such a gap constitutes implicit assistance to domestic downstream industries and, thus, provides them with a competitive advantage.
Taka razlika pomeni posredno pomoč domačim industrijam s konca proizvodne verige in jim tako zagotavlja konkurenčno prednost.
This argument is further reinforced by the fact that there is no export tax levied on exports of the product concerned (seamless stainless steel pipes and tubes), which also benefits from a VAT rebate.
Ta argument nadalje podkrepi dejstvo, da se izvozni davek ne zaračuna na izvoz zadevnega izdelka (brezšivne cevi iz nerjavnega jekla), za katerega je prav tako odobren rabat glede DDV.
The current investigation, by establishing the different use of export taxes and VAT rebates on both the upstream and downstream industries demonstrates State interference, which can be concluded from the significant price difference for stainless steel raw materials (notably stainless steel billets, ingots, round bars) on the Chinese and world markets.
Z ugotovitvijo, da se izvozni davki in rabati glede DDV drugače uveljavljajo na začetku in koncu proizvodne verige, trenutna preiskava dokazuje vmešavanje države, o čemer se lahko sklepa na podlagi velikih razlik v ceni surovin iz nerjavnega jekla (zlasti drogov iz nerjavnega jekla, ingotov, okroglih palic) na Kitajskem in svetovnih trgih.
Given the price difference between Chinese domestic and world markets, in the absence of the State interference, the domestic producers of the above mentioned raw materials would be inclined to export their products to markets with higher prices where they could achieve higher profits.
Glede na razliko v ceni med kitajskim domačim in svetovnimi trgi bi domači proizvajalci navedenih surovin brez vmešavanja države svoje izdelke najverjetneje izvažali na trge z višjimi cenami, kjer bi lahko dosegli večje dobičke.
Indeed, the Chinese customs statistics confirm that there are virtually no exports of stainless steel billets from the PRC to the rest of the world.
Kitajski carinski statistični podatki namreč potrjujejo, da LRK praktično ne izvaža drogov iz nerjavnega jekla v druge države.
In 2009, the exports of stainless steel ingots and other primary forms of stainless steel amounted to less then 2 tons and in 2010 less then 5 tons.
Leta 2009 je izvoz ingotov iz nerjavnega jekla in drugih primarnih oblik iz nerjavnega jekla znašal manj kot 2 toni, leta 2010 pa manj kot 5 ton.
This is a further argument demonstrating State interference in the raw materials market.
To je dodatni argument, ki dokazuje vmešavanje države v trg surovin.
These Chinese practices are to be considered as an underlying factor of State interference in decisions of firms regarding raw materials.
Te kitajske prakse se štejejo za ključni dejavnik vmešavanja države v odločitve podjetij glede surovin.
Indeed, the current Chinese system of high export duties and no VAT reimbursement for export of raw materials has essentially lead to a situation where Chinese raw material prices continue to be the result of State intervention, and will, in all likelihood, continue to provide in the future a support to the Chinese producers of seamless stainless steel pipes and tubes.
Trenutni kitajski sistem visokih izvoznih dajatev in brez vračila DDV za izvoz surovin je namreč na koncu privedel do tega, da so kitajske cene surovin še naprej rezultat vmešavanja države ter bodo najverjetneje v prihodnosti še naprej zagotavljale podporo kitajskim proizvajalcem brezšivnih cevi iz nerjavnega jekla.
Further, in relation to criterion 1, one of the companies failed to include in its sampling information and the MET claim two related suppliers of raw materials.
V povezavi z merilom 1 ena družba v informacije o vzorčenju in v zahtevek za TGO ni vključila podatka o dveh povezanih dobaviteljih surovin.
The company claimed that those suppliers supply small quantities and thus the fact that they were not reported could not and would not have any substantial impact on the outcome of the investigation.
Družba je trdila, da navedena dobavitelja dobavljata le majhne količine ter tako dejstvo, da nista bila navedena, ne bi moglo imeti in ne bo imelo kakršnega koli pomembnega učinka na izid preiskave.
It is noted that that first of all the Commission has to obtain a full picture of all companies in a group involved in the production or sales of the product concerned, regardless of the size of those companies or the size of their sales.
Gre omeniti, da mora Komisija najprej imeti popoln pregled nad vsemi družbami v skupini, ki so vključene v proizvodnjo ali prodajo zadevnega izdelka, ne glede na velikost navedenih družb ali obseg njihove prodaje.
It is further noted that the supplies of raw materials are rather fragmented, dispersed among several small suppliers.
Nadalje gre omeniti, da je dobava surovin precej razdrobljena, razpršena med več majhnih dobaviteljev.
It was concluded that the company, set aside the distortion of main inputs described above, failed to demonstrate that its business decisions were made in response to market signals, without significant State interference, and costs reflected market values.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da družba, brez upoštevanja navedenega izkrivljanja podatkov o glavnih vložkih, ni dokazala, da so bile njene poslovne odločitve sprejete v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, brez občutnega vmešavanja države, pri čemer stroški izražajo tržne vrednosti.
Apart from criterion 1, certain companies also failed to demonstrate that they fulfilled criterion 2 and 3.
Poleg merila 1 nekatere družbe prav tako niso dokazale, da izpolnjujejo merili 2 in 3.
Two companies could not demonstrate that they had a clear set of accounting records that was independently audited and in line with international accounting standards.
Dve družbi nista mogli dokazati, da imata jasno določeno zbirko osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se pregledujejo neodvisno in v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
For one company, discrepancies in the financial records were not reflected in the auditor's report.
Pri eni družbi se odstopanja v finančnih evidencah niso odražala v revizorskem poročilu.
Another company could not present financial statements for some years of its operation.
Druga družba za določena leta delovanja ni mogla zagotoviti računovodskih izkazov.
Finally, one company received loans from State owned banks at preferential rates, significantly lower than market rates.
Ena družba je od bank v državni lasti prejela posojila po preferencialnih obrestnih merah, ki so bile občutno nižje od tržnih obrestnih mer.
This demonstrates that production costs and the financial situation are subject to significant distortions carried over from the non-market economy system.
To dokazuje, da so stroški proizvodnje in finančne razmere podvrženi znatnim izkrivljanjem, prenesenim iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
Following disclosure of the MET findings, comments were received from the Union industry and three sampled exporting (groups of) producers concerned.
Po razkritju ugotovitev TGO so industrija Unije in trije zadevni vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki (skupine teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov) poslali pripombe.
One company claimed that the Commission’s decision to reject MET was influenced and hence biased by the calculation of the dumping margin.
Ena družba je trdila, da je na odločitev Komisije za zavrnitev TGO vplival izračun stopnje dampinga in da je ta zato pristranska.
In this regard it has to be noted that the MET determination precedes any dumping calculation and any verification which took place related solely to the data related to MET determination.
V povezavi s tem je treba omeniti, da se o določitvi TGO odloči pred kakršnim koli izračunom dampinga in da je bilo kakršno koli izvedeno preverjanje povezano izključno s podatki, povezanimi z določitvijo TGO.
The claim is thus unfounded.
Trditev je zato neutemeljena.
One company claimed that it was not required to submit MET claims for related raw material suppliers.
Ena družba je trdila, da se od nje ni zahtevalo, da predloži zahtevke za TGO za povezane dobavitelje surovin.
This argument has to be rejected.
Ta argument je treba zavrniti.
The notice of initiation stated clearly that the names and the precise activities of all related companies involved in the production and/or sales (export and/or domestic) of the product under investigation have to be provided to the Commission.
V obvestilu o začetku je bilo jasno navedeno, da je treba Komisiji predložiti podatke o imenih in natančnih dejavnostih vseh povezanih podjetij, ki so vključena v proizvodnjo in/ali prodajo (izvoz in/ali domačo prodajo) izdelka v preiskavi.
Further, that company claimed that the distortions on the raw materials market were not significant because 17,5 % of the raw material is imported from unrelated international suppliers and the rest is mainly purchased from related companies.
Nadalje je navedena družba trdila, da izkrivljanja na trgu surovin niso bila bistvena, saj 17,5 % surovin uvažajo od nepovezanih mednarodnih dobaviteljev, preostali delež pa večinoma nabavljajo pri povezanih družbah.
The information at the Commission’s disposal demonstrates that around 30 % of raw materials are purchased locally and the rest is mainly imported from related suppliers.
Po informacijah, ki so Komisiji na voljo, je približno 30 % surovin nabavljenih na lokalnem trgu, preostali delež pa večinoma uvozijo od povezanih dobaviteljev.
In this context, it has to be noted that transfer prices from related suppliers are normally not considered as reliable information.
Pri tem gre omeniti, da se transferne cene povezanih dobaviteljev običajno ne štejejo za zanesljive informacije.
Further, overall the raw material purchase prices of the company from independent suppliers are significantly lower than prices in the EU or in the US like for the other investigated exporting producers.
Na splošno so nabavne cene surovin neodvisnih dobaviteljev za družbo občutno nižje od cen v EU ali ZDA kot za druge proizvajalce izvoznike v preiskavi.
The claim is thus rejected.
Tako se ta trditev zavrne.
One company contested Commission's calculation of the price difference between raw materials prices on the Chinese domestic and world markets.
Ena družba je nasprotovala načinu, kako je Komisija izračunala razliko v ceni med cenami surovin na kitajskem domačem trgu in svetovnimi trgi.
Following the verification, the Commission confirms this calculation.
Komisija po preverjanju potrjuje ta izračun.
In particular the company did not take into account the surcharges for alloy applied by the US and EU suppliers.
Družba zlasti ni upoštevala dodatnih dajatev za zlitine, ki jih zaračunavajo dobavitelji iz ZDA in EU.
The claim thus has to be rejected.
Zato je treba trditev zavrniti.
One company further claimed that the discrepancies between the income tax declaration and the financial statement were normal, not significant and therefore there was no obligation for explanations in the notes to the financial statement.
Ena družba je nadalje trdila, da so bila odstopanja med davčno napovedjo in računovodskimi izkazi običajna in ne bistvena, zato obrazložitve v opombah k računovodskim izkazom niso bile potrebne.
Consequently, this should thus not have had an impact on the Commission's determination.
Posledično to ne bi smelo vplivati na določitev Komisije.
It is noted that the discrepancies regarding annual profit are close to 30 million RMB and thus should have been considered as important and therefore to be explained in the notes to the financial statement.
Gre omeniti, da so odstopanja glede letnega dobička blizu 30 milijonov RMB ter jih je zato treba šteti za pomembne in bi morala biti obrazložena v opombah k računovodskim izkazom.
Another claim related to an alleged breach of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and the EU basic Anti-Subsidy Regulation.
Druga trditev je bila povezana z domnevno kršitvijo Sporazuma STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih in osnovno protisubvencijsko uredbo EU [7].
The company stated that rejecting the MET claim on the grounds that companies may be receiving subsidies has the effect of penalising exporter for subsidies deemed illegal without any substantiation.
Družba je navedla, da z zavrnitvijo zahtevka za TGO na podlagi dejstva, da družbe mogoče prejemajo subvencije, kaznujejo izvoznika za subvencije, ki se štejejo za nezakonite brez vsake utemeljitve.
The MET claims have not been rejected on the basis of possible subsidies but on specific grounds set out in the recitals above as well as in the detailed MET disclosure documents sent to parties.
Zahtevki za TGO niso bili zavrnjeni na podlagi možnih subvencij, ampak zaradi specifičnih razlogov, navedenih v predhodnih uvodnih izjavah in podrobnih dokumentih o razkritju TGO, ki so bili poslani stranem.
The main reason for the rejection of the MET was distortions established on the raw materials market.
Glavni razlog za zavrnitev TGO so bila izkrivljanja, ki so bila ugotovljena na trgu surovin.
Further it should be underlined that for example companies obtained loans from state owned banks at preferential rates significantly lower than market rates, clearly demonstrates the carry over from the previous non-market economy.
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da že na primer dejstvo, da so družbe od bank v državni lasti dobile posojila po preferencialnih obrestnih merah, ki so bile občutno nižje od tržnih obrestnih mer, jasno dokazuje prenos iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
In conclusion, none of the comments received was such as to alter the findings with regard to MET determination.
Nobena prejeta pripomba torej ni bila taka, da bi spremenila ugotovitve glede določitve TGO.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out below:
Le zaradi lažjega sklicevanja so merila na kratko povzeta:
in the case of wholly or partly foreign owned firms or joint ventures, exporters are free to repatriate capital and profits;
pri družbah ali skupnih družbah, ki so v celoti ali deloma v tuji lasti, lahko izvozniki svobodno vrnejo kapital in dobičke v domovino;
export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sale are freely determined;
izvozne cene ter obseg in pogoji prodaje so svobodno določeni;
State officials appearing on the Boards of Directors or holding key management positions shall either be in minority or it must be demonstrated that the company is nonetheless sufficiently independent from State interference;
Državni uradniki, ki so člani upravnih odborov ali zasedajo ključne vodstvene položaje, morajo biti v manjšini ali pa je treba dokazati, da je družba kljub temu dovolj neodvisna od vmešavanja države;
exchange rate conversions are carried out at the market rate; and
valute se menjajo po tržnih tečajih ter
The three above mentioned sampled (groups of) companies, which were denied MET, also claimed individual treatment (‘IT’).
Navedene tri vzorčene družbe (skupine družb), ki jim je bila zavrnjena TGO, so zahtevale tudi individualno obravnavo („IO“).
It was provisionally found that all these three sampled (groups of) companies met the conditions of Article 9 (5) of the basic Regulation and could thus be granted IT.
Začasno je bilo ugotovljeno, da vse tri vzorčene družbe (skupine družb) izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe in se jim IO zato lahko odobri.
In accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, normal value for exporting producers not granted MET shall be established on the basis of domestic prices or constructed normal value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe je normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, določena na podlagi domačih cen ali konstruirane normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the Notice of initiation, the Commission indicated that it envisaged using the USA as analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC.
V obvestilu o začetku je Komisija izrazila svoj namen, da kot primerljivo državo za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK predvideva uporabo ZDA.
One party claimed that India was a better analogue market because of similar level of development to the PRC.
Ena stran je trdila, da je trg Indije bolj primeren za primerjavo, saj je na podobni stopnji razvoja kot v LRK.
The Commission obtained no cooperation from the Indian producers.
Indijski proizvajalci niso sodelovali s Komisijo.
The USA seemed initially appropriate given its openness to import competition (customs tariffs of 0 % as opposed to 10 % in India) and a fairly good level of competition on the domestic market with 15 to 20 USA producers.
ZDA so se na začetku zdele primerne zaradi svoje odprtosti do uvozne konkurence (carinske tarife v višini 0 % v primerjavi z 10 % v Indiji) in relativno dobre stopnje konkurence na domačem trgu z 15 do 20 proizvajalci iz ZDA.