natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Further, it has to be noted that the undercutting levels disclosed in the provisional Regulation and above in recital (93) are an indication that the underselling levels using the approach suggested by certain parties would be much higher.
Nadalje je treba omeniti, da so stopnje nelojalnega nižanja, razkrite v začasni uredbi in zgoraj v uvodni izjavi (93), znak, da bi bile stopnje prodaje po nelojalno znižanih cenah z uporabo pristopa, ki ga predlagajo nekatere strani, še veliko višje.
Taking into account these changes the duty rate amounts to 22,3 %.
Ob upoštevanju teh sprememb znaša stopnja dajatve 22,3 %.
Applicability of ‘OEM duty’ to AM sales
Uporaba „dajatve OEM“ za prodajo AM
One party claimed that it was inappropriate that the calculation of the injury elimination level was based only on OEM sales while the duty was also applicable to AM wheels.
Ena stran je trdila, da ni bilo primerno, da je izračun stopnje odprave škode temeljil samo na prodaji OEM, dajatev pa se je uporabljala tudi za kolesa AM.
However, as explained above (and also in points (174) – (177) of the provisional Regulation), this approach is appropriate in this case, in particular since 85 % of Union producers’ sales relate to the OEM segment.
Vendar, kot je razloženo zgoraj (in tudi v točkah od (174) do (177) začasne uredbe), je ta pristop v tem primeru ustrezen, zlasti ker se 85 % prodaje proizvajalcev Unije nanaša na področje OEM.
The approach applied by the Commission whereby the calculation of the injury elimination element has been limited only to the OEM was the most appropriate.
Pristop, ki ga je uporabila Komisija, pri katerem je bil izračun elementa odprave škode omejen samo na OEM, je bil najprimernejši.
A different approach did not seem appropriate because it would lead to a situation where a set of export data geared more to AM would be compared to that of the EU industry selling predominantly to the OEM segment.
Drugačen pristop se ni zdel primeren, ker bi vodil v razmere, ko bi se niz podatkov o izvozu, bolj usmerjenih v AM, primerjal s podatki o industriji EU, ki prodaja predvsem na področju OEM.
The approach applied is justified and reasonable given that the aim of the measure is to eliminate injury of the EU industry.
Uporabljeni pristop je utemeljen in upravičen glede na to, da je bil cilj ukrepa odpraviti škodo industriji EU.
It ensures that the duty was not set at a level higher than what is necessary to eliminate injury.
Zagotavlja, da dajatev ne bo določena na višji ravni, kot je potrebno za odpravo škode.
Impracticability and the obligation to establish an individual duty for those operators having been granted IT
Neizvedljivost in obveznost uvedbe individualne dajatve za tiste subjekte, ki jim je bila odobrena IO
One party caimed that unlike the first paragraph of Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, the second paragraph does not provide for the possibility not to specify the individual duty.
Ena stran je trdila, da v nasprotju s prvim odstavkom člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe drugi odstavek ne določa možnosti, da se individualna dajatev ne določi.
Consequently, it argued that the exception linked to impracticability could not be applied in the present case and that the obligation to establish an individual duty rate for those exporters having been granted IT remains.
Zato je trdila, da se v tem primeru ne more uporabiti izjema, povezana z neizvedljivostjo, in da ostaja obveznost, da se določi individualna stopnja dajatve za tiste izvoznike, ki jim je bila dodeljena IO.
Certain parties further claimed that impracticability was only due to the methodology applied; hence it was ‘self-induced’ by the Commission.
Nekatere strani so nadalje trdile, da je vzrok za neizvedljivost samo uporabljena metodologija; ker jo je Komisija „sama povzročila“.
The parties alleged that the Commission had at its disposal all data submitted by the AM exporting producers enabling it to include AM sales in the calculation of the injury elimination level.
Strani so domnevale, da je imela Komisija na voljo vse podatke, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci izvozniki AM, in je imela možnost vključiti prodajo AM v izračun stopnje odprave škode.
Finally, certain parties claimed that since the Commission was able to calculate undercutting separately for OEM and AM segments it must have been able to calculate underselling.
Nazadnje, nekatere strani so trdile, da bi Komisija lahko izračunala prodajo po nelojalno znižanih cenah, saj je lahko izračunala nelojalno nižanje posebej za področji OEM in AM.
A final argument was that AM prices could be compared with OEM prices since the PCN construction did not make any distinction between the two segments.
Končni argument je bil, da bi se lahko cene AM primerjale s cenami OEM, ker ni bilo pri sestavljanju kontrolne številke izdelkov (PCN) nobene razlike med obema področjema.
Regarding the first argument, it is true that Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation is based on the presumption that if an operator is granted IT, it will be possible to specify an individual duty for it.
Glede prvega argumenta je res, da temelji člen 9(5) osnovne uredbe na predpostavki, da bo subjektu, ki mu je odobrena IO, mogoče določiti individualno dajatev.
However, in this particular case, doing so would be impracticable and/or inappropriate.
Vendar bi bilo v tem posebnem primeru to neizvedljivo in/ali neprimerno.
That is because, as explained above, for determining the injury elimination level it is necessary to focus on OEM sales.
Gre za to, kot je razloženo zgoraj, da se je za določitev stopnje odprave škode treba osredotočiti na prodajo OEM.
Moreover, regarding all producers having been granted IT, a duty also based on their AM-sales would be inappropriately high, i.e. in excess of what would be warranted in the circumstances of this particular case in order to eliminate injury.
Poleg tega bi bila ob upoštevanju vseh proizvajalcev, ki jim je bila odobrena IO, dajatev, ki bi temeljila tudi na njihovi prodaji AM, neprimerno visoka in bi torej presegala tisto, kar bi bilo upravičeno v okoliščinah tega posebnega primera za odpravo škode.
That is because, as explained above, an injury elimination level of 22,3 % is sufficient to protect Union producers on their primary market (OEM).
Vzrok je v tem, kot je razloženo zgoraj, da je stopnja odprave škode v višini 22,3 % dovolj za zaščito proizvajalcev Unije na njihovem primarnem trgu (OEM).
A duty which would also be based on those producers’ AM-sales – which, in all three cases of producers granted IT, would be higher – would therefore be unduly high.
Dajatev, ki bi temeljila tudi na prodaji proizvajalcev AM – ki bi bila v vseh treh primerih proizvajalcev, ki jim je bila odobrena IO, višja – bi bila zato neupravičeno visoka.
It also has to be mentioned that the reference to lack of reliable data in recital (182) of the provisional Regulation did not relate to the quality of data provided but to the type of data used for the calculation (PCN matching per car maker, i.e. comparing the models sourced from the PRC and EU by a specific car maker).
Treba je tudi omeniti, da se sklicevanje na pomanjkanje zanesljivih podatkov v uvodni izjavi (182) začasne uredbe ne nanaša na kakovost zagotovljenih podatkov, temveč na vrsto podatkov, uporabljenih pri izračunu (ujemanje PCN po izdelovalcu avtomobilov, to je primerjanje modelov, ki jih je posamezni izdelovalec avtomobilov pridobil iz LRK in EU).
The type of procedure used to source wheels on the OEM segment gave the opportunity to achieve a greater level of comparability.
Vrsta uporabljenega postopka za nabavo koles na področju OEM je omogočila večjo raven primerljivosti.
The same type of data, due to the fact that different procedures are used, could not be provided for the AM-sales.
Zaradi dejstva, da se uporabljajo različni postopki, ni bilo mogoče zagotoviti enake vrste podatkov za prodajo AM.
The exercise of establishing injury on the basis of Article 3 of the basic Regulation is legally separate from setting the level of the duty.
Izvedba določanja škode na podlagi člena 3 osnovne uredbe je zakonsko ločena od določanja stopnje dajatve.
The latter exercise is conducted once injury has been established with a view to setting a level of duty which would be sufficient to remedy injury.
Slednje se izvede potem, ko je ugotovljena škoda, da se določi stopnja dajatve, ki bi zadoščala za odpravo škode.
Consequently, the Commission conducted this calculation in accordance with the chosen methodology.
Zato je Komisija izvedla ta izračun v skladu z izbrano metodologijo.
Also the fact that the PCN structure did not include the criterion of sales channels is not linked to the methodology applied when establishing the injury elimination level.
Tudi dejstvo, da struktura PCN ni vključevala merila prodajnih poti, ni povezana z metodologijo, uporabljeno pri določanju stopnje odprave škode.
Parties’ arguments related to the application of impracticability exception as well as to the unconditional character of the obligation to establish an individual duty rate have to be rejected.
Argumente strani v zvezi z uporabo neizvedljivosti izjeme pa tudi z nepogojno naravo obveznosti, da se določi individualna stopnja dajatve, je treba zavrniti.
Representativity of transactions used
Reprezentativnost uporabljenih transakcij
Parties’ criticisms related also to the fact that the injury elimination level calculation was arbitrary because it selected only few unrepresentative transactions.
Kritike strani so se nanašale tudi na dejstvo, da je bil izračun stopnje odprave škode samovoljen, ker je bilo izbranih le nekaj nereprezentativnih transakcij.
First and foremost, parties claimed that the calculation was based on an unrepresentative volume of import transactions from the PRC.
Strani so trdile predvsem, da je izračun temeljil na nereprezentativnem obsegu transakcij uvoza iz LRK.
Such an approach allegedly contradicts the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement [12] as it cannot be considered as based on positive evidence.
Tak pristop je domnevno v nasprotju s Protidampinškim sporazumom STO [12], ker se ne more šteti, da temelji na trdnih dokazih.
Complainant argued that the fact that most of the EU industry sales were OEM was of no importance since the purpose of the underselling calculation is to determine the average amount by which the price of dumped imports should be raised in order not to cause injury.
Pritožnik je trdil, da dejstvo, da je bila večina prodaje industrije EU prodaja OEM, ni pomembno, ker je bil namen izračuna prodaje po nelojalno znižanih cenah določitev povprečnega zneska, za katerega bi bilo treba dvigniti ceno dampinškega uvoza, da ne bi povzročil škode.
The underselling calculation must be representative for the dumped imports and not for the sales of EU industry.
Izračun prodaje po nelojalno znižanih cenah mora biti reprezentativen za dampinški uvoz in ne za prodajo industrije EU.
Another party claimed that such an approach contradicted Institutions’ own practice as normally the individual undercutting and underselling is weighted per PCN on the basis of share of undercutting and underselling quantities of exports rather than quantities sold by EU industry.
Druga stran je trdila, da je tak pristop v nasprotju z lastno prakso institucij, ker se posamezno nelojalno nižanje in prodaja po nelojalno znižanih cenah tehtata glede na kontrolno številko izdelka na podlagi deleža nelojalnega nižanja in količine izvoza po nelojalno znižanih cenah namesto po količinah, ki jih je prodala industrija EU.
It is recalled that the injury elimination margin reflects (based on the sample) the situation of around 85 % of the EU industry sales, which are directed to the OEM segment.
Opozarja se, da stopnja odprave škode (na podlagi vzorca) odraža položaj približno 85 % prodaje industrije EU, ki je usmerjena na področje OEM.
It was the choice of methodology, and not the technicalities of the calculation as such, that was driven by the specific situation on the EU market where the majority of sales are directed to the OEM segment.
Posebne razmere na trgu EU, kjer je bila večina prodaje usmerjena na področje OEM, so vplivale predvsem na izbiro metodologije in ne na tehnične podrobnosti samega izračuna.
This choice led the Commission to compare prices at the level of car maker, achieving a greater level of comparability and at the same time ensuring that the injury elimination level is not overstated.
Ta izbira je vodila Komisijo v primerjavo cen na ravni izdelovalca avtomobilov, s čimer je dosegla višjo raven primerljivosti in hkrati zagotovila, da ni bila stopnja odprave škode precenjena.
It is further recalled with regard to representativity that the matching ratio of export transactions used in proportion with all exports by sampled Chinese exporters into the OEM segment was found to be more than 55 %.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da je bilo glede reprezentativnosti ugotovljeno, da je bila stopnja ujemanja uporabljenih izvoznih transakcij v sorazmerju z vsem izvozom vzorčenih kitajskih izvoznikov na področje OEM, večja od 55 %.
Such a ratio was considered representative given the methodology used in calculating the injury elimination level.
Takšno razmerje je veljalo za reprezentativno glede na metodologijo, uporabljeno pri izračunu stopnje odprave škode.
Duty based on undercutting
Dajatev na podlagi prodaje po nelojalno znižanih cenah
One party claimed that the injury margin should have been based on undercutting pursuant to the practice established in the Council Regulation (EC) No 1531/2002 [13] imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of colour television receivers originating in the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia and Thailand.
Ena stran je trdila, da bi morala stopnja škode temeljiti na nelojalnem nižanju na podlagi prakse iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1531/2002 [13] o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu barvnih televizijskih sprejemnikov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Republike Koreje, Malezije in Tajske.
Indeed in this case the duty was based on price undercutting taking account of the fact that factors other than the dumped imports appeared to have contributed to the injury to the Union industry and secondly that on a worldwide basis this industry had for a number of years realised no or extremely low profits [14].
V tem primeru je dajatev res temeljila na nelojalnem nižanju cen ob upoštevanju dejstva, da so dejavniki razen dampinškega uvoza, kot kaže, prispevali k škodi industrije Unije, in drugič, da ta industrija po vsem svetu že več let ni ustvarila nobenega dobička ali pa izredno malo [14].
It should be noted that the factors that led to the decision to set the level of duties at the level of price undercutting are not applicable to the present case.
Treba je opozoriti, da se dejavniki, ki so vodili v odločitev, da se določi stopnja dajatve na stopnji nelojalnega nižanja cen, v tem primeru ne morejo uporabiti.
Unlike in colour television receivers case [15] the product concerned is not characterised by low levels of profitability.
V nasprotju s primerom barvnih televizijskih sprejemnikov [15] za zadevni izdelek ni značilna nizka raven dobičkonosnosti.
The profitability decreased substantially as a result of low priced imports from the country concerned.
Dobičkonosnost se je znatno znižala zaradi nizkih cen uvoza iz zadevne države.
Also the imports from other third countries remained stable over the period considered.
Poleg tega je uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav v obravnavanem obdobju ostal stabilen.
Conclusion on injury elimination level
Sklepna ugotovitev o stopnji odprave škode
The approach in the provisional Regulation with regard to the methodology used is hereby confirmed.
Pristop v začasni uredbi glede uporabljene metodologije se potrdi.
Taking into account parties’ comments on adjustments the re-calculated level of the duty amounts to 22,3 %.
Ob upoštevanju pripomb strani o prilagoditvah vrednosti znaša ponovno izračunana stopnja dajatve 22,3 %.
ALLEGATION OF CIRCUMVENTION
DOMNEVA O IZOGIBANJU
Parties alleged that measures can possibly be circumvented, pointing to notably recent increase of imports of ARWs from countries without known local production.
Strani so domnevale, da se je ukrepom mogoče izogniti, in opozorile predvsem na nedavno povečanje uvoza aluminijastih koles iz držav brez znane lokalne proizvodnje.
Competent authorities have been alerted about those developments and possibilities and the issue will be closely monitored.
Pristojni organi so bili opozorjeni na ta razvoj in možne primere in zadeva se bo natančno spremljala.
One unrelated importer expressed an interest to offer a price undertaking.
En nepovezani uvoznik je izrazil interes, da ponudi cenovno zavezo.
Although no formal price undertaking was offered, it is noted that Article 8 of the basic Regulation limits the possibility to offer price undertakings exclusively to exporters.
Čeprav ni bila ponujena uradna cenovna zaveza, se opozarja, da člen 8 osnovne uredbe omejuje možnost, da se ponudi cenovna zaveza, izključno na izvoznike.
The Commission’s practice not to accept undertaking offers from importers was also accepted by the European Court of Justice [16], arguing, inter alia, that the acceptance of an undertaking offered by an importer would have the effect of encouraging him to continue to obtain supplies at dumped prices.
Prakso Komisije, da ne sprejema ponudb zaveze od uvoznikov, je sprejelo tudi Sodišče Evropske unije [16] med drugim z argumentom, da bi imel sprejem zaveze, ki jo ponudi uvoznik, učinek spodbujanja, naj še naprej pridobiva zaloge po dampinških cenah.
Two cooperating Chinese exporting producers offered a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Dva sodelujoča kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika sta ponudila cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, the product concerned exists in a multitude of product types, for which prices vary significantly (for one company even up to 300 %), thus posing a very high risk of cross-compensation.
Vendar zadevni izdelek obstaja v številnih vrstah izdelkov, katerih cene se znatno razlikujejo (pri eni družbi celo do 300 %), zato je tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije veliko.
In addition, the product types will evolve in design and finishing.
Poleg tega se bodo vrste izdelkov razvile pri oblikovanju in končni obdelavi.
It was therefore considered that the product is not suitable for a price undertaking.
Zato se je obravnavalo, da izdelek ni primeren za cenovno zavezo.
In addition, one of the companies did receive neither Market Economy Status nor Individual Treatment, whereas for the other company, major accounting problems were identified and its structure and product range (production of OEM/AM) was considered too complex.
Eni izmed družb nista bila priznana status tržnega gospodarstva in individualna obravnava, pri drugi družbi pa so bile ugotovljene velike računovodske težave, njena struktura in paleta izdelkov (proizvodnja OEM/AM) pa sta veljali za preveč kompleksni.
The undertaking offers therefore were rejected.
Ponudbe zavez so se zato zavrnile.
Statistics of aluminium wheels are frequently expressed in number of pieces.
Statistika za aluminijasta kolesa je pogosto izražena v številu kosov.
However, there is no such supplementary unit for aluminium wheels specified in the Combined Nomenclature laid down in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff [17].
Vendar v kombinirani nomenklaturi, ki je določena v Prilogi I k Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 z dne 23. julija 1987 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi, ni nobene dodatne enote za aluminijasta kolesa [17].
It is therefore necessary to provide that not only the weight in kg or tonnes but also the number of pieces of the product concerned and of certain products of CN code ex87169090 for imports is entered in the declaration for release for free circulation.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da se v deklaracijo za sprostitev v prosti promet ne vnese samo teža v kg ali tonah, ampak tudi število kosov zadevnega izdelka in nekaterih izdelkov oznake KN ex87169090 za uvoz.
DEFINITIVE COLLECTION OF PROVISIONAL DUTY
DOKONČNO POBIRANJE ZAČASNIH DAJATEV
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of aluminium road wheels of the motor vehicles of CN headings 8701 to 8705, whether or not with their accessories and whether or not fitted with tyres, currently falling within CN codes ex87087010 and ex87087050 (TARIC codes 8708701010 and 8708705010) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz aluminijastih koles za motorna vozila pod tarifnimi številkami KN od 8701 do 8705, s priborom ali brez, z nameščenimi pnevmatikami ali brez, ki so trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN ex87087010 in ex87087050 (oznaki TARIC 8708701010 in 8708705010) in s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 shall be 22,3 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Unije, pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelek iz odstavka 1 je 22,3 %.
Amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 on imports of certain aluminium road wheels, currently falling within CN codes ex87087010 and ex87087050 (TARIC codes 8708701010 and 8708705010), and originating in the People’s Republic of China, shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 404/2010, na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih koles, trenutno uvrščenih pod oznaki KN ex87087010 in ex87087050 (oznaki TARIC 8708701010 in 8708705010) in s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se dokončno poberejo.
Where a declaration for release for free circulation is presented in respect of imports of aluminium road wheels of vehicles of CN heading 8716, whether or not with their accessories and whether or not fitted with tyres, and currently falling within CN code ex87169090, TARIC code 8716909010 shall be entered in the relevant field of that declaration.
Kadar se predloži deklaracija za sprostitev v prosti promet za uvoz aluminijastih koles za vozila pod tarifno številko KN 8716, s priborom ali brez, z nameščenimi pnevmatikami ali brez, in trenutno uvrščenih pod oznako KN ex87169090, se oznaka TARIC 8716909010 vpiše v ustrezno okence v navedeni deklaraciji.
Member States shall, on a monthly basis, inform the Commission of the number of pieces imported under this code, and of their origin.
Države članice mesečno obveščajo Komisijo o številu kosov, uvoženih pod to oznako, in njihovem poreklu.
Where a declaration for release for free circulation is presented in respect of the products mentioned under Articles 1 and 3, the number of pieces of the products imported shall be entered in the relevant field of that declaration.
Kadar se predloži deklaracija za sprostitev v prosti promet za izdelke iz členov 1 in 3, se število uvoženih izdelkov vpiše v ustrezno okence v navedeni deklaraciji.
OJ L 117, 11.5.2010, p. 64.
UL L 117, 11.5.2010, str. 64.
European Communities-Countervailing Measures on Dynamic random Access memory Chips from Korea, WT/DS299/R, Panel Report 17 June 2005, para 7186.
Izravnalni ukrepi Evropskih skupnosti za čipe za dinamične pomnilnike iz Koreje, WT/DS299/R, Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, 17. junij 2005, odstavek 7186.
Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 188, 18.7.2009).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti (UL L 188, 18.7.2009).
Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co. Ltd and Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd vs Council.
Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co. Ltd in Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd proti Svetu.
There was a clerical error in recital (90) of the provisional Regulation which stated that the increase amounted to 0,5 % (it was 0,5 EUR and 1,6 %).
V uvodni izjavi 90 začasne uredbe, ki je navajala, da je povečanje znašalo 0,5 % (bilo je 0,5 EUR in 1,6 %), je bila pisna napaka.