natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They informed the Commission and the Air Safety Committee about these measures: Cyprus decided on 26 November 2010 to suspend the Air Operator Certificate (AOC) of the air carrier Eurocypria Airlines following the stop of operations and the lack of financial means of the air carrier to operate in safe conditions; Italy decided to suspend on 24 October 2010 the air transport licence held by the air carrier Livingston and that held by the air carrier ItaliAirlines on 11 March 2011; Lithuania decided to revoke the AOC of the air carrier Star 1 Airlines on 11 November 2010; following the liquidation of the air carrier Blue Line and the subsequent suspension of its operating licence, France decided to suspend the AOC of this air carrier on 6 October 2010.
O teh ukrepih so obvestile Komisijo in Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu: Ciper se je 26. novembra 2010 odločil za začasen preklic spričevala letalskega prevoznika Eurocypria Airlines, in sicer po prenehanju obratovanja in pomanjkanju finančnih sredstev letalskega prevoznika za varno izvajanje poletov; Italija se je 24. oktobra 2010 odločila za začasen preklic operativne licence letalskega prevoznika Livingston, 11. marca 2011 pa je enako odločitev sprejela še v zvezi z letalskim prevoznikom ItaliAirlines. Litva se je 11. novembra 2010 odločila za razveljavitev spričevala letalskega prevoznika Star 1 Airlines. Po likvidaciji letalskega prevoznika Blue Line in sledečem začasnem preklicu njegove operativne licence se je Francija 6. oktobra 2010 odločila začasno preklicati njegovo spričevalo.
Furthermore, France decided not to renew the AOC of Strategic Airlines on 16 September 2010; Greece decided to revoke the AOC of Hellas Jet in November 2010, had suspended the AOC of Athens Airways in January 2011, and had placed Hellenic Imperial Airways under heightened surveillance; Sweden decided not to renew the AOC of the air carrier Viking Airlines AB on 31 December 2010 and the United Kingdom had increased their surveillance activity of the air carriers Jet2.com, Oasis and Titan Airways.
Francija se je 16. septembra 2010 odločila, da ne bo obnovila spričevala letalskega prevoznika Strategic Airlines. Grčija se je novembra 2010 odločila za razveljavitev spričevala letalskega prevoznika Hellas Jet, januarja 2011 je začasno preklicala spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Athens Airways, družbo Hellenic Imperial Airways pa začela strogo nadzorovati.
Portugal
Švedska se je 31. decembra 2010 odločila, da ne bo obnovila spričevala letalskega prevoznika Viking Airlines AB. Združeno kraljestvo je povečalo nadzor nad letalskimi prevozniki Jet2.com, Oasis in Titan Airways. Portugalska
Following-up the review of the situation of certain air carriers licensed in Portugal at the Air Safety Committee held in November 2010 [4], the competent authorities of Portugal (INAC) informed about the results of the enhanced safety oversight of the air carriers Luzair and White.
Pristojni organi Portugalske (INAC) so na podlagi pregleda stanja določenih na Portugalskem licenciranih letalskih prevoznikov, ki je bil opravljen na zasedanju Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu novembra 2010 [4], poročali o rezultatih okrepljenega nadzora varnosti pri letalskih prevoznikih Luzair in White.
In addition, EASA reported that the air carriers were inspected in November 2010 and that neither inspection revealed significant deficiencies.
Poleg tega je EASA poročala, da je bil novembra 2010 pri letalskih prevoznikih pregled opravljen in da pri nobenem pregledu niso bile odkrite znatne pomanjkljivosti.
In the context of a general change of policy in the company, two aircraft of type A320 with registration marks CS-TQO and CS-TQK were phased out in 12 November 2010 and 22 February 2011 respectively.
V okviru splošne spremembe politike družbe sta bila zrakoplova tipa A320 z registrskima oznakama CS-TQO in CS-TQK umaknjena iz obratovanja 12. novembra 2010 oziroma 22. februarja 2011.
Following the analysis of SAFA inspection data by EASA and the identification of an increased number of certain German air carriers with results from SAFA inspections of greater than a major finding per inspection, the Commission launched formal consultations with the competent authorities of Germany (Luftfahrtbundesamt — LBA) and held a meeting on 10 March 2011.
Komisija je po analizi podatkov iz pregledov SAFA, ki jo je izvedla EASA, in ugotovitvi povečanja števila določenih nemških letalskih prevoznikov, katerih rezultati pri pregledih SAFA so pokazali več kot eno pomembno ugotovitev na pregled, začela uradna posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Nemčije (Luftfahrtbundesamt – LBA) ter 10. marca 2011 pripravila srečanje.
The root cause analysis of the performance of these air carriers revealed particular weaknesses in the oversight of these carriers as also directly evidenced in a standardisation inspection carried out by EASA from 26-29 May 2009 in the field of operations which also pointed at an insufficient numbers of qualified personnel within the LBA, thus impacting upon Germany’s ability to ensure continuous oversight and limiting the LBA’s ability to increase the level of oversight where necessary.
Analiza temeljnih vzrokov delovanja teh letalskih prevoznikov je pokazala posamezne slabosti pri nadzoru nad temi letalskimi prevozniki, kar je neposredno razvidno tudi iz pregleda standardizacije, ki ga je EASA področju letalske dejavnosti opravila med 26. in 29. majem 2009 in ki je izpostavila tudi nezadostno število usposobljenega osebja v LBA, kar vpliva na sposobnost Nemčije za zagotavljanje stalnega nadzora in zmožnost LBA, da stopnjo nadzora po potrebi poveča.
The particular situation of Bin Air, an air carrier certified in Germany, was discussed at the meeting of 10 March where the air carrier attended and made presentations indicating the actions it had taken to address verified safety deficiencies identified during SAFA inspections.
Na srečanju 10. marca se je obravnaval primer letalskega prevoznika Bin Air, ki je certificiran v Nemčiji, pri čemer je bil letalski prevoznik navzoč in je predstavil ukrepe, ki jih je sprejel za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih med pregledi SAFA.
Also, the competent authorities of Germany informed the Commission of the suspension of the AOC of the air carrier ACH Hamburg GmbH.
Pristojni organi Nemčije so Komisijo obvestili tudi o začasnem preklicu spričevala letalskega prevoznika ACH Hamburg GmbH.
Germany confirmed to the Air Safety Committee that the AOC of ACH Hamburg GmbH remained in suspension and the situation would be reviewed in May 2011, and if no progress had been made by this air carrier by that date the AOC would be revoked.
Nemčija je Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu potrdila, da spričevalo letalskega prevoznika ACH Hamburg GmbH ostaja preklicano in da se bodo razmere pregledale maja 2011. Če zadevni letalski prevoznik do takrat ne bo dosegel nobenega napredka, se bo njegovo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika razveljavilo.
Germany also informed that the oversight activities regarding the air carrier Bin Air had been intensified, the aircraft of type Cessna C550, registration D-IJJJ, had been removed from the AOC of air carrier Advance Air Luftfahrtgesellschaft, and that the LBA had intensified its oversight of other air carriers where poor results from ramp checks had highlighted safety deficiencies.
Nemčija je tudi sporočila, da so bile okrepljene nadzorne dejavnosti pri letalskem prevozniku Bin Air, da je bil zrakoplov Cessna C550 z registrsko oznako D-IJJJ umaknjen iz spričevala letalskega prevoznika družbe Advance Air Luftfahrtgesellschaft in da je LBA okrepil nadzor nad drugimi letalskimi prevozniki, pri katerih so slabi rezultati preverjanj na ploščadi izpostavili varnostne pomanjkljivosti.
The LBA stated that they had made it clear to these air carriers that suspension of their AOCs could be the consequence if no improvements were noted.
LBA je navedel, da je bilo tem letalskim prevoznikom jasno povedano, da če ne bo ugotovljenih nobenih izboljšav, se lahko njihovo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika začasno prekliče.
In terms of the lack of qualified staff, Germany informed the Air Safety Committee that no improvement in the situation would occur in 2011.
Kar zadeva pomanjkanje usposobljenega osebja, je Nemčija Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu obvestila, da se razmere v letu 2011 ne bodo izboljšale.
However, an assessment of the LBA’s personnel resources was underway and should conclude in spring 2011, therefore an improvement in the personnel situation is to be anticipated from 2012 onwards.
Ocena kadrovskih virov LBA se izvaja in bi morala biti končana spomladi 2011, zato se lahko izboljšanje stanja pri osebju pričakuje po letu 2012.
The Commission and the Air Safety Committee noted the efforts made by the competent authorities of Germany in resolving the identified safety deficiencies of certain air carriers, and the work underway to address the shortfall in personnel resources within the LBA.
Komisija in Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu sta seznanjena s prizadevanji pristojnih organov Nemčije za odpravo ugotovljenih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti pri nekaterih letalskih prevoznikih in z delom za odpravo pomanjkanja kadrovskih virov v LBA.
However, the Commission also emphasised that, without prejudice to the enforcement powers conferred on it by the Treaty, if such actions are ineffective in improving the performance of air carriers certified in Germany, action would be necessary to ensure that identified safety risks have been adequately controlled.
Vendar je Komisija tudi poudarila, da bodo – brez poseganja v izvršilna pooblastila, ki ji jih podeljuje Pogodba – potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi za zagotovitev ustreznega nadzora nad ugotovljenimi varnostnimi tveganji, če bodo sprejeti ukrepi za izboljšanje kakovosti v Nemčiji certificiranih letalskih prevoznikov neučinkoviti.
Following the analysis of SAFA inspection data by EASA and the identification of an increased number of Spanish air carriers with results from SAFA inspections of greater than a major finding per inspection, the Commission launched formal consultations with the competent authorities of Spain (AESA) and held a meeting on 14 March 2011.
Komisija je po analizi podatkov iz pregledov SAFA, ki jo je izvedla EASA, in ugotovitvi povečanja števila španskih letalskih prevoznikov, pri katerih so rezultati pregledov SAFA pokazali več kot eno pomembno ugotovitev na pregled, začela uradna posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Španije (AESA) ter 14. marca 2011 pripravila srečanje.
In addition the air carrier detailed the actions taken following the accident to aircraft of type Fairchild Metro 3, registration EC-ITP.
Letalski prevoznik je bil navzoč in je predstavil ukrepe, ki jih je sprejel za odpravo ugotovljenih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, izpostavljenih med pregledi SAFA Poleg tega je letalski prevoznik podrobno navedel ukrepe, ki jih je sprejel po nesreči zrakoplova tipa Fairchild Metro 3 z registrskimi oznakami EC-ITP.
Flightline explained that they had entered into a business arrangement with the company Air Lada, not a certified air carrier, to operate two Fairchild Metro 3 aircraft, registrations EC-GPS and EC-ITP, using pilots provided by Air Lada.
Družba Flightline je razložila, da je sklenila poslovni dogovor z družbo Air Lada, ki ni certificiran letalski prevoznik, v skladu s katerim družba Flightline izvaja lete z dvema zrakoplovoma Fairchild Metro 3 z registrskimi oznakami EC-GPS in EC-ITP s piloti, ki jih zagotovi Air Lada.
The Commission pointed out to Flightline that the same aircraft had been previously operating within the AOC of Eurocontinental, another air carrier certified in Spain, and that as a result of SAFA inspections and significant safety incidents with the operation of these aircraft, AESA had suspended Eurocontinental’s AOC.
Komisija je družbo Flightline opozorila, da je pred tem lete z navedenima zrakoplovoma v okviru svojega spričevala letalskega prevoznika izvajala družba Eurocontinental, ki je tudi certificirana v Španiji, in da je AESA, na podlagi rezultatov pregledov SAFA ter pomembnih varnostnih incidentov pri letih s tema zrakoplovoma začasno preklical spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Eurocontinental.
Flightline stated they had conducted all the required conversion training of the pilots and had carried out quality checks of the operation of the aircraft in the Isle of Man.
Družba Flightline je navedla, da je na otoku Man izvedla vsa zahtevana konverzijska usposabljanja pilotov in preverjanja kakovosti opravljanja letov.
The Commission requested further details concerning the air carrier’s corrective action plan and copies of the internal audit reports of the Fairchild Metro 3 operation.
Komisija je zahtevala dodatne podrobnosti glede načrta korekcijskih ukrepov tega letalskega prevoznika in izvode poročil notranje revizije v zvezi z opravljanjem letov z zrakoplovi Fairchild Metro 3.
Following receipt of the information on 22 March, the Commission invited the air carrier Flightline to make presentations to the Air Safety Committee.
Komisija je po prejemu informacij dne 22. marca letalskega prevoznika Flightline povabila k predstavitvi pred Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu.
At the meeting on 14 March 2011 AESA briefed the Commission that they decided to limit the AOC of Flightline to prevent operation of the Fairchild Metro 3s, and that they had initiated the process to suspend the AOC.
AESA je na srečanju 14. marca 2011 Komisijo obvestil o svoji odločitvi za omejitev spričevala letalskega prevoznika Flightline, da se prepreči opravljanje letov z zrakoplovi Fairchild Metro 3, in da je začel postopek za začasni preklic spričevala letalskega prevoznika.
The Commission invited AESA to provide further clarification on enforcement action concerning four other air carriers certified in Spain which had been identified by EASA as having poor SAFA results.
Komisija je AESA pozvala k predložitvi dodatnih pojasnil glede izvršilnih ukrepov v zvezi s štirimi drugimi letalskimi prevozniki, certificiranimi v Španiji, pri katerih je EASA ugotovila slabe rezultate SAFA.
AESA subsequently informed the Commission on 28 March 2011 that, following recent audits of Air Taxi and Charter International, and Zorex, significant safety discrepancies had been noted and, therefore, the procedure to suspend the AOCs of both air carriers had been initiated.
AESA je nato Komisijo 28. marca 2011 obvestila, da so bila po nedavnih revizijah letalskih prevoznikov Air Taxi and Charter International in Zorex ugotovljena znatna odstopanja pri varnosti in da je bil zato za oba letalska prevoznika sprožen postopek za začasen preklic spričevala letalskega prevoznika.
In terms of the air carrier Jetnova, AESA awaited the response of the air carrier to specific findings made by AESA and if found to be inadequate will initiate the suspension procedure.
Kar zadeva letalski prevoznik Jetnova, AESA čaka na njegov odgovor glede določenih pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovila, in če bo odgovor neprimeren, bo začela postopek za začasen preklic.
With respect to the air carriers Aeronova, Tag Aviation and Alba Star, AESA was continuing its oversight but considered specific regulatory action was not required at this stage.
Pri letalskih prevoznikih Aeronova, Tag Aviation in Alba Star je AESA nadaljevala svoj nadzor, vendar je menila, da posebno regulativno ukrepanje na tej stopnji ni potrebno.
Spain informed the Air Safety Committee that following discrepancies found during inspections of Flightline, AESA had initiated on 14 March 2011 a procedure to suspend the AOC of Flightline and had introduced precautionary measures to address the immediate safety concern.
Španija je Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu obvestila, da je AESA po neskladnostih, ugotovljenih med pregledi pri letalskem prevozniku Flightline, 14. marca 2011 začela postopek za začasen preklic spričevala letalskega prevoznika Flightline in uvedla previdnostne ukrepe za obravnavo najnujnejših pomislekov grede varnosti.
AESA confirmed that Flightline had subsequently taken action to address the immediate safety concern and also provided a Corrective Action Plan which was being evaluated by AESA.
AESA je potrdila, da je zato Flightline sprejel ukrepe za obravnavo najnujnejših pomislekov glede varnosti in zagotovil tudi načrt korekcijskih ukrepov, ki ga je AESA ovrednotila.
In light of the actions undertaken by the competent authorities of Spain in resolving the identified safety deficiencies of Flightline and other Spanish air carriers it is assessed that, at this time, no further action is necessary.
Ob upoštevanju ukrepov, ki so jih pristojni organi Španije sprejeli za odpravljanje ugotovljenih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti pri družbi Flightline in drugih španskih letalskih prevoznikih, se ocenjuje, da za zdaj dodatni ukrepi niso potrebni.
However, the Commission underlined that if such actions are ineffective in improving the performance of air carriers certified in Spain, action would be necessary to ensure that identified safety risks have been adequately controlled.
Vendar je Komisija poudarila, da bodo potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi za zagotovitev ustreznega nadzora nad ugotovljenimi varnostnimi tveganji, če bodo sprejeti ukrepi za izboljšanje kakovosti v Španiji certificiranih letalskih prevoznikov neučinkoviti.
In the meantime, the Commission, in cooperation with EASA, will continue to monitor the safety performance of Spanish air carriers.
Komisija bo v sodelovanju z EASA še naprej spremljala varnost španskih letalskih prevoznikov.
With regard to the oversight of TAAG Angolan Airlines, INAVIC confirmed the information presented to the Commission on 3 March 2011: two aircraft B777 operated by TAAG had been involved in two serious incidents in December 2010 in Portugal and in Angola with damage not contained to the engine.
INAVIC je v zvezi z nadzorom letalskega prevoznika TAAG Angolan Airlines potrdil informacije, ki so bile 3. marca 2011 predstavljene Komisiji. Decembra 2010 sta imela dva zrakoplova B777, s katerima leti TAAG, na Portugalskem oziroma v Angoli resna incidenta, pri katerih ni bil poškodovan samo motor.
Following preliminary results of the investigation carried out by the competent authorities of Portugal, at this stage, it appeared that both the air carrier and the competent authorities have taken the necessary measures to address the causes identified in relation with the manufacturer and to prevent their further reoccurrence.
Po predhodnih rezultatih preiskave, ki jo izvajajo pristojni organi Portugalske, se na tej stopnji zdi, da so tako letalski prevoznik kot pristojni organi izvedli potrebne ukrepe za odpravo ugotovljenih vzrokov v zvezi s proizvajalcem in za preprečitev njihovega nadaljnjega pojavljanja.
The operations have now resumed, including to the EU, under an enhanced surveillance programme in liaison with the manufacturer.
Z leti, tudi v EU, se zdaj nadaljuje pod okrepljenim programom spremljanja v povezavi s proizvajalcem.
Six air carriers found not in compliance with the Angolan aviation safety regulations: AIR GEMINI, SERVISAIR, ALADA, RUI & CONCEICAO, PHA and SAL.
Za šest letalskih prevoznikov je bilo ugotovljeno, da ne izpolnjujejo angolskih varnostnih predpisov za letalstvo: AIR GEMINI, SERVISAIR, ALADA, RUI & CONCEICAO, PHA in SAL.
In particular, INAVIC provided evidence that their AOC had expired and had not been renewed or were revoked.
INAVIC je predložil dokaze, da so spričevala navedenih letalskih prevoznikov potekla in niso bila obnovljena oziroma so bila razveljavljena.
Consequently, on the basis of the common criteria, these carriers should be removed from Annex A.
Zato je treba na podlagi splošnih meril navedene letalske prevoznike umakniti iz Priloge A.
INAVIC also indicated that the AOC of the two air carriers, ANGOLA AIR SERVICES and GIRA GLOBO, have been suspended.
INAVIC je navedel tudi, da sta bili spričevali dveh letalskih prevoznikov, ANGOLA AIR SERVICES in GIRA GLOB, začasno preklicani.
Pending evidence of technical capacity to complete satisfactorily the certification process by 15 April 2011, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these carriers should remain in Annex A.
Do prejetja dokazov o tehnični zmožnosti za zadovoljivo dokončanje postopka certificiranja do 15. aprila 2011 se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi morala ta prevoznika ostati v Prilogi A.
Consequently, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these carriers should remain on Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi morali ti letalski prevozniki ostati v Prilogi A.
INAVIC further indicated that it had certified one new air carrier: FLY540 on 31 January 2011.
Nadalje je INAVIC navedel, da je certificiral enega novega letalskega prevoznika: FLY540, in sicer 31. januarja 2011.
However, there is no verified evidence that sufficient investigations was conducted prior to the issuance of these new AOCs nor that the significant safety concern identified by ICAO in relation to the certification of air carriers in Angola was effectively closed.
Vendar ni preverjenih dokazov o tem, da so bile pred izdajo teh novih spričeval letalskih prevoznikov izvedene zadostne preiskave, niti o tem, da so bili zadržki glede varnosti, ki jih je v zvezi s certificiranjem letalskih prevoznikov v Angoli ugotovil ICAO, uspešno odpravljeni.
Consequently, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these carriers should be placed on Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba te letalske prevoznike uvrstiti v Prilogo A.
INAVIC finally reported that four air carriers were still in the recertification process: DIEXIM, AIRNAVE, GUICANGO and MAVEWA.
Nazadnje je INAVIC navedel, da so za štiri letalske prevoznike še tekli postopki za ponovno certifikacijo: DIEXIM, AIRNAVE, GUICANGO in MAVEWA.
The recertification process, which was expected to be completed by end of 2010, was delayed until 15 April 2011, date by which INAVIC indicated that those carriers shall stop operations if not recertified in accordance with the Angolan aviation safety regulations.
Postopek ponovne certifikacije, ki naj bi bil predvidoma končan do konca leta 2010, je bil odložen do 15. aprila 2011, ko naj bi, kot je določil INAVIC, ti prevozniki prenehali z opravljanjem dejavnosti, če ne bodo ponovno certificirani v skladu z angolskimi varnostnimi predpisi za letalstvo.
Pending the conclusion of this process, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these carriers as well as other air carriers under the regulatory responsibility of INAVIC should remain in Annex A.
Dokler ta postopek ni končan, se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi morali tako ti kot drugi letalski prevozniki pod regulatornimi pristojnostmi INAVIC ostati v Prilogi A.
The Commission urges INAVIC to finalise the recertification of the Angolan air carriers with determination and due consideration to potential safety concerns identified in this process.
Komisija spodbuja INAVIC, naj konča postopek ponovne certifikacije letalskih prevoznikov iz Angole ob ustreznem upoštevanju morebitnih pomislekov glede varnosti, ugotovljenih v tem postopku.
The Commission also encourages INAVIC to fully cooperate with ICAO in order to validate the progress in the implementation of its corrective action plan, including if possible and as appropriate, through an on-site mission (ICAO Coordinated Validation Mission — ICVM).
Komisija INAVIC spodbuja tudi k popolnemu sodelovanju z ICAO, da se potrdi napredek pri izvajanju načrt korekcijskih ukrepov, kar vključuje misijo na kraju samem (misija ICAO za potrjevanje), če bo ta mogoča in potrebna.