natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This rider, the financial component of which is described in more detail below, strengthens still further the identifying values of the public service performed by France Télévisions and sets new quantitative indicators to be attained per year in some of the areas indicated in recital 18.
S tem dodatkom, katerega finančni del je natančneje opisan v nadaljevanju, so okrepljene vrednote identitete javne službe, ki jo opravlja skupina France Télévisions, in določeni novi kvantitativni kazalniki, ki jih je treba doseči vsako leto na nekaterih področjih, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 18.
The discontinuance of broadcasting of television services by terrestrial radio link in analogue mode is scheduled for 30 November 2011 at the latest.
Ukinitev analognega oddajanja televizijskih storitev na prizemni herčni način je predvidena najpozneje za 30. november 2011.
Apart from the exception for the generic advertising of goods or services, provision is made for derogations for the broadcasting of advertising messages for the overseas departments and territories and New Caledonia, in the absence of the availability of private television broadcasted by terrestrial radio link without the need for a decoder.
Poleg izjeme za oglaševanje blaga in storitev brez blagovne znamke so predvidena odstopanja za predvajanje oglasnih sporočil v čezmorskih departmajih in skupnostih ali na Novi Kaledoniji, če ni zasebne televizijske ponudbe, ki se oddaja v nekodirani obliki na prizemni herčni način.
The table above shows an estimated deficit corresponding to the uncovered net cost for the public service accounts of France Télévision in 2010 and 2011.
V zgornji preglednici je prikazana napoved primanjkljaja, ki ustreza nepokritim neto stroškom javne službe, ki jo opravlja skupina France Télévisions, za leti 2010 in 2011.
This deficit should be absorbed in part in 2012, with a slight surplus forecasted of EUR [30–50] million, i.e. [0-5] % of the net public service costs.
Ta primanjkljaj bi moral biti delno odpravljen leta 2012 s predvidenim manjšim presežkom v višini [30–50] milijonov EUR oziroma [0–5] % neto stroškov javne službe.
This estimated surplus for 2012, if it were to materialise in fact, which presupposes that the trend in revenues and costs follows the forecasted trend precisely, remains below the cumulated deficit forecasted for 2010 and 2011.
Napovedani presežek za leto 2012 bo, če bi se napoved uresničila, kar pomeni, da bi se morali prihodki in stroški gibati natančno po predvidevanjih, nižji od skupnega primanjkljaja, predvidenega za leti 2010 in 2011.
Under the current agreement in respect of objectives and means, surpluses not allocated to reducing the public funding requirement will have to be allocated as a priority to the expenditure on audiovisual creation.
Na podlagi veljavne pogodbe o ciljih in sredstvih se morajo presežki, ki niso namenjeni znižanju potreb po javnih sredstvih, prednostno nameniti za pokrivanje izdatkov za avdiovizualno ustvarjanje.
However, for the television services other than those broadcasted by terrestrial radio link in analogue mode, this rate is set at 1,5 % in 2009, 2 % in 2010 and 2,5 % in 2011.
Vendar je za televizijske storitve, ki se ne oddajajo analogno na prizemni herčni način, ta stopnja 1,5 % za leto 2009, 2 % za leto 2010 in 2,5 % za leto 2011.
As a transitional measure, for all taxable persons, until the year of the discontinuance in mainland France of analogue terrestrial broadcasting, the tax is capped at 50 % of the increase in its assessment basis calculated for the calendar year for which the tax is payable in relation to 2008.
Prehodno je za vse zavezance do leta ukinitve analognega oddajanja televizijskih storitev na prizemni herčni način v metropolitanski Franciji ta davek omejen na 50 % povečanja davčne osnove, ugotovljenega v koledarskem letu, za katero je treba plačati davek, v primerjavi z letom 2008.
In any event, the amount of the tax may be no less than 1,5 % of the assessment basis.
Vsekakor znesek davka ne more biti nižji od 1,5 % davčne osnove.
In 2010, France Télévisions will therefore have to devote to heritage audiovisual creation a 19 % share of the turnover included in the assessment basis for 2009, a share which is to be raised to 20 %, i.e. EUR 420 million in 2012. The equivalent share of TF1, on the other hand, is capped at 12,5 % and those of M6 and the digital terrestrial television channels respectively will not exceed 11 %.
Tako bo leta 2010 skupina France Télévisions ustvarjanju avdiovizualne dediščine morala nameniti 19 % prometa, vključenega v davčno osnovo za leto 2009, ta delež pa se bo v letu 2012 povečal na 20 %, to je na 420 milijonov EUR. Nasprotno je enakovredni delež TF1 omejen na 12,5 %, delež M6 in digitalnih zemeljskih televizij pa na 11 %.
The commitment in favour of cinema will also be increased by over 1,2 % as an annual average rate until 2012.
Tudi obveznosti do kinematografije bodo do leta 2012 naraščale v povprečju za več kot 1,2 % na leto.
The discontinuance of advertising would go hand in hand with an increase in the cost of the programme schedule as regards non-imported own production works, which show commitment to an innovative, quality public service.
Vzporedno z ukinitvijo oglaševanja naj bi se povečali stroški programske sheme na področju lastne in ne uvožene produkcije, ki pričajo o zavezah za inovativno in kakovostno javno službo.
Television apparently accounted for only about 11 % of the EUR 33 billion of communication expenditure by advertisers in 2008.
Televizija naj bi leta 2008 predstavljala le približno 11 % od 33 milijard EUR izdatkov oglaševalcev za komunikacije.
Between January and September 2009, the advertising turnover of digital terrestrial television channels experienced 60 % growth, compared to an 8 % fall for the three old private channels broadcasting by terrestrial radio link.
Od januarja do septembra 2009 so se prihodki iz oglaševanja digitalnih prizemnih televizij povečali za 60 %, prihodki treh prvotnih zasebnih herčnih televizij pa so se zmanjšali za 8 %.
In this way, it is planned to amend Article 2 of Decree No 2007-958 of 15 May 2007.
Predvidena je sprememba člena 2 odloka št. 2007-958 z dne 15. maja 2007.
The purpose of this amendment is:
Namen te spremembe je:
Article 107(1) of the TFEU provides that ‘Save as otherwise provided in the Treaties, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the internal market.’
Člen 107(1) PDEU določa: „Razen če Pogodbi ne določata drugače, je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica, ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami“.
These criteria are examined below.
Ti pogoji za uporabo so proučeni v nadaljevanju.
The General Court of the Union considered that both the provisions enshrining the principle of non-overcompensation and the control and verification of the conditions applied by France Télévisions to its commercial activities responded perfectly to the concerns expressed by the Commission during the procedure which led to the Decision of 20 April 2005 [15].
Splošno sodišče Unije je odločilo, da določbe, s katerimi je uzakonjena prepoved prekomernega nadomestila, ter nadzor in preverjanje pogojev, pod katerimi skupina France Télévisions opravlja komercialne dejavnosti, popolnoma odgovarjajo na pomisleke, ki jih je Komisija izrazila v postopku, v katerem je bila sprejeta odločba z dne 20. aprila 2005 [15].
The appropriateness of the ex post controls carried out on the respect of these commitments was also confirmed by the General Court [16].
Poleg tega je Splošno sodišče potrdilo, da so naknadni nadzori spoštovanja teh zavez ustrezni [16].
The reports available conclude that the public resources allocated to the France Télévisions group did not exceed the net cost of discharging the public service obligations entrusted to it and that France Télévisions respected normal market conditions in all its commercial activities.
Iz razpoložljivih poročil je razvidno, da javna sredstva, dodeljena skupini France Télévisions, niso presegla neto stroškov izvajanja obveznosti javne službe, ki jo opravlja, in da je skupina France Télévisions spoštovala običajne tržne pogoje pri vseh svojih komercialnih dejavnostih.
It follows from the case-law of the Court of Justice, confirmed by the judgment of 22 December 2008 in the case referred for a preliminary ruling Régie Networks (C-333/07) (paragraph 99) that ‘For a tax to be regarded as forming an integral part of an aid measure, it must be hypothecated to the aid under the relevant national rules, in the sense that the revenue from the charge is necessarily allocated for the financing of the aid and has a direct impact on the amount of the aid and, consequently, on the assessment of the compatibility of that aid with the common market.’
Iz sodne prakse Sodišča, ki je bila potrjena s sodbo z dne 22. decembra 2008 v postopku za predhodno odločanje v zadevi Régie Networks (C-333/07, točka 99), izhaja da „za to, da bi bila dajatev lahko sestavni del ukrepa pomoči, mora na podlagi upoštevne nacionalne zakonodaje med takso in pomočjo obstajati stvarna zveza v takem smislu, da so prihodki od dajatve nujno namenjeni financiranju pomoči in nanjo neposredno vplivajo ter posledično neposredno vplivajo na presojo združljivosti s skupnim trgom“ [18].
The two conditions for application established by the Court, i.e. the relevant national rules and the direct impact on the amount of the aid, are examined below.
Pogoja uporabe, ki ju je določilo Sodišče, to sta upoštevna nacionalna zakonodaja in neposreden vpliv na znesek pomoči, sta proučena v nadaljevanju.
Article 44 of Law No 86-1067 of 30 September 1986 specifies that ‘The public resources allocated to public broadcasters in compensation for the public service obligations entrusted to them shall not exceed the cost of discharging these obligations’. This provision results from France’s commitments expressly to enshrine in law the principle of non-overcompensation for the public service obligations established under the procedure which led to the Commission’s compatibility decision of 20 April 2005 on the use of the resources from the licence fee [14].
V členu 44 zakona št. 86-1067 z dne 30. septembra 1986 je navedeno, da „javna sredstva, dodeljena organizacijam v javnem avdiovizualnem sektorju kot nadomestilo za obveznosti javne službe, ki jo opravljajo, ne presegajo zneska stroškov izvajanja teh obveznosti.“ Ta določba izhaja iz zavez Francoske republike, da bo izrecno uzakonila načelo prepovedi prekomernih nadomestil za obveznosti javne službe, v okviru postopka, v katerem je Komisija 20. aprila 2005 izdala odločbo o združljivosti uporabe sredstev iz naročnine [14].
Not only did the expected transfer of EUR 350 million of turnover to the three channels broadcasting by radio link fail to occur in 2009, but the latter recorded an amount EUR 450 million below the forecasts. Furthermore, the scale of this transfer would be limited in any case by laws and regulations which, transposing Union law, limit the time devoted to advertising to a maximum of 12 minutes per hour of broadcasting, provided that a daily average of 6 minutes per hour is not exceeded.
Ne le, da pričakovanega prenosa 350 milijonov EUR prometa na tri herčne televizije v letu 2009 ni bilo, te televizije v primerjavi z napovedmi ugotavljajo celo upad za 450 milijonov EUR. Poleg tega naj bi obseg te preusmeritve na vsak način omejevali zakoni in drugi predpisi, s katerimi je preneseno pravo Unije in ki omejujejo čas, namenjen oglaševanju, na največ dvanajst minut na uro oddajanja, če ni preseženo dnevno povprečje šest minut na uro.
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) [1], and in particular Articles 6(4), 7(3), 8(7), 9(4), 10(3), 12(6), 13(5) and 15(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov (Uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov) [1], in zlasti členov 6(4), 7(3), 8(7), 9(4), 10(3), 12(6), 13(5) in 15(6) Uredbe,
On 22 December 2006 [2], the Commission adopted Decision 2007/76/EC implementing Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws as regards mutual assistance.
Komisija je 22. decembra 2006 sprejela Odločbo 2007/76/ES o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov, v zvezi z medsebojno pomočjo [2].
Decision 2007/76/EC was amended by Commission Decision 2008/282/EC [3] to establish the principles governing the notification of enforcement measures, the information to be supplied in notifications following the notification of an alert and the coordination of market surveillance and enforcement activities.
Odločba 2007/76/ES je bila spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 2008/282/ES [3], da se določijo načela za obvestilo o izvršilnih ukrepih, informacije, ki jih je treba navesti v obvestilih po poslanem opozorilu, in usklajevanje tržnega nadzora ter izvršilne dejavnosti.
The requirements laid down by Decision 2007/76/EC in respect of deletions in the database provided for in Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and in respect of regular notifications need to be reviewed on the basis of the experience gained with the operation of the enforcement cooperation network.
Zahteve iz Odločbe 2007/76/ES glede izbrisov v podatkovni zbirki iz člena 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 glede rednih obvestil je treba pregledati na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj pri mrežah za sodelovanje pri izvrševanju.
It is also appropriate to clarify rules governing the obligations of the coordinating competent authority, the participation in coordinated enforcement activities, and the minimum information to be supplied in the framework of such activities.
Prav tako je primerno pojasniti pravila, ki urejajo obveznosti usklajevalnega pristojnega organa, sodelovanje pri usklajenih izvršilnih dejavnostih in minimalne informacije, ki jih je treba predložiti v okviru teh dejavnosti.
It is necessary to align Decision 2007/76/EC with opinion 6/2007 [4] of the Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data set up by Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] and the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor [6].
Uskladiti je treba Odločbo 2007/76/ES z mnenjem 6/2007 [4] Delovne skupine o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov iz člena 29 Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5] in mnenjem Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov [6].
Decision 2007/76/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2007/76/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up by Article 19(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 19(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 –
The Annex to Decision 2007/76/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2007/76/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
Opinion 6/2007/EC on data protection issues related to the Consumer Protection Cooperation System (CPCS) 01910/2007/EN, WP 139, adopted on 21 September 2007.
Mnenje 6/2007 o vprašanjih varstva podatkov, povezanih s sistemom sodelovanja na področju varstva potrošnikov (SSVP) 01910/2007/EN, WP 139, sprejeto 21. septembra 2007.
EDPS Opinion Ref. 2010-0692.
Mnenje ENVP ref. 2010-0692.
point 2.1.3 is replaced by the following:
Točka 2.1.3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
If no agreement can be reached, the requested authority shall issue a response supplying all the relevant information at its disposal and indicating the investigation and enforcement actions taken or planned (including time limits) no later than 14 days after the date of receipt of a request via its single liaison office.
Če dogovora ni mogoče doseči, zaprošeni organ najpozneje v štirinajstih dneh po prejemu prošnje preko enotnega povezovalnega organa odgovori organu prosilcu z vsemi ustreznimi razpoložljivimi informacijami, in navede izvedene ali načrtovane ukrepe v zvezi s preiskavo ali izvrševanjem (vključno z roki).
The requested authority shall update the applicant authority on these actions on a regular basis as appropriate but at least every 3 months until:
Zaprošeni organ redno in vsaj vsake tri mesece sporoči organu prosilcu novosti v zvezi z zadevnimi ukrepi, dokler:
any relevant information required to establish whether an intra-Community infringement has occurred or to establish whether there is a reasonable suspicion it may occur has been sent to the applicant authority; or
se organu prosilcu ne pošljejo katere koli ustrezne informacije, potrebne za ugotovitev, ali je prišlo do kršitve znotraj Skupnosti, oziroma za ugotovitev, ali obstaja utemeljen sum, da bi do kršitve lahko prišlo, ali
the intra-Community infringement has ceased or the request has proved to be unfounded.’;
je bila kršitev znotraj Skupnosti prekinjena ali je bila prošnja neutemeljena.“
in point 2.1.5, the following paragraphs are added:
V točki 2.1.5 se dodajo naslednji odstavki:
‘A competent authority shall, as soon as it discovers that a request for mutual assistance pursuant to Articles 6, 7 and 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 contains erroneous data that can not be corrected by other means, request the Commission to remove the information from the database as soon as technically possible and, in any case, not later than 7 days after receiving the request for deletion.
„Pristojni organ takoj, ko izve, da prošnja za medsebojno pomoč v skladu s členi 6, 7 in 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 vsebuje napačne podatke, ki jih ni mogoče drugače popraviti, zaprosi Komisijo, da takoj, ko je tehnično mogoče, v vsakem primeru pa najpozneje v sedmih dneh, odstrani podatke iz baze podatkov.
All other information relating to requests for mutual assistance pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 shall be removed from the database 5 years after the closure of the case.’;
Vse druge informacije v zvezi s prošnjami za medsebojno pomoč v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 se odstranijo iz podatkovne zbirke pet let po zaključku primera.“
in point 2.2.2 the following paragraph is added:
V točki 2.2.2 se doda naslednji odstavek:
‘Founded alerts shall be removed from the database 5 years after they are issued.’;
„Utemeljena opozorila se črtajo iz podatkovne zbirke pet let po izdaji.“
in Chapter 4, the heading is replaced by the following:
V poglavju 4 se naslov nadomesti z naslednjim:
CHAPTER 4 – ACCESS TO INFORMATION EXCHANGED AND DATA PROTECTION’;
POGLAVJE 4 – DOSTOP DO IZMENJANIH INFORMACIJ IN VARNOST PODATKOV“.
the following points 4.3 and 4.4 are inserted:
Vstavita se točki 4.3 in 4.4:
Commission access to data
Dostop Komisije do podatkov
The Commission’s access to data shall be limited to what is required under Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
Dostop Komisije do podatkov je omejen na tisto, kar se zahteva v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2006/2004.
This includes access to alerts pursuant to Article 7(1), to notifications pursuant to Articles 7(2) and 8(6), and to information relating to the coordination of market surveillance and enforcement activities pursuant to Article 9 and to conditions pursuant to Article 15(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
To vključuje dostop do opozoril v skladu s členom 7(1), obvestil v skladu s členoma 7(2) in 8(6) in informacij glede usklajevanja tržnega nadzora in izvršilnih dejavnosti v skladu s členom 9 in pogoji iz člena 15(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004.
Sensitive data
Občutljivi podatki
The processing by competent authorities of personal data linked to race, ethnicity, political opinions, religion, trade-union membership, health or sex life shall be prohibited, unless the fulfilment of the obligations under Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 is otherwise impossible and the processing of such data is permitted under Directive 95/46/EC.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov, ki so povezani z rasnim ali etničnim izvorom, političnim mnenjem, vero, pripadnostjo sindikatu, zdravjem in spolnim življenjem, je s strani pristojnih organov prepovedana, razen, če je izpolnjevanje obveznosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 onemogočeno in je obdelava podatkov dovoljena z Direktivo 95/46/ES.
The use by competent authorities of personal data linked to offences, suspected offences and security measures shall be limited to the specific purposes of mutual assistance as defined in Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.’;
Uporaba osebnih podatkov, ki so povezani s prekrški, domnevnimi prekrški in varnostnimi ukrepi, je omejena na posebne namene medsebojne pomoči, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 2006/2004.“
Chapter 6 is replaced by the following:
Poglavje 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
CHAPTER 6 – COORDINATION OF MARKET SURVEILLANCE AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
POGLAVJE 6 – USKLAJEVANJE TRŽNEGA NADZORA IN IZVRŠILNIH DEJAVNOSTI
When applying Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004, the authorities who have agreed to coordinate their enforcement activities may decide on all the necessary steps to ensure adequate coordination and shall carry them out to the best of their abilities.
Pri uporabi člena 9(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 se lahko organi, ki so se strinjali, da bodo usklajevali izvršilne dejavnosti, odločijo za vse potrebne korake za ustrezno usklajevanje, ki jih bodo izvajali po svojih najboljših močeh.
A competent authority may refuse to follow an invitation to participate in coordinated enforcement activities, following consultation with the inviting authority if:
Pristojni organ lahko po posvetovanju z organom prosilcem zavrne povabilo k sodelovanju pri usklajenih izvršilnih dejavnostih, če:
judicial proceedings have already been initiated or a final judgment has already been passed in respect of the same intra-Community infringements and against the same sellers or suppliers before the judicial authorities in the Member State of the requested or applicant authority;
so sodni organi v državi članici zaprošenega organa ali organa prosilca glede istih kršitev znotraj Skupnosti in proti istim prodajalcem ali dobaviteljem že uvedli kazenske preiskave ali sodni postopek oziroma izdali pravnomočno sodbo;
in its opinion, following appropriate investigation, it is not concerned by the intra-Community infringement.
ga po ustrezni preiskavi ne zadevajo kršitve znotraj Skupnosti.
If a competent authority decides to decline an invitation to participate in coordinated enforcement activities it shall state the reasons of its decision.
Če pristojni organ zavrne povabilo k sodelovanju pri usklajenih izvršilnih dejavnostih, navede razloge za svojo odločitev.
This point shall be without prejudice to the application of Articles 6 and 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
Ta točka ne posega v uporabo členov 6 in 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004.
In order to fulfil their obligations pursuant to Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004, the competent authorities concerned may decide that one of them shall coordinate the enforcement action.
Za izpolnitev svojih zahtev v skladu s členom 9(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 se lahko vsi zadevni pristojni organi odločijo, da eden izmed njih usklajuje izvršilni ukrep.