natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See 2007 report from the National Regulatory Authority.
Glej Poročilo nacionalnega regulativnega organa za leto 2007.
By the Cost Calculation Department at the Accounting Centre.
V oddelku za izračun stroškov pri računovodskem centru.
E.g. Weaknesses in the internal control environment such as lack of procedures to apply consistently allocation keys or to control the quality of input data, Excessive simplification of cost allocation methods.
Npr. pomanjkljivosti notranjega nadzornega središča, kot so neobstoj postopkov za dosledno uporabo obračunskih ključev ali kontrolo kakovosti vhodnih podatkov, prekomerno poenostavljanje metod razporejanja stroškov.
‘Other operating results’, ‘financial results’ and ‘extraordinary results’ should also be allocated to services.
Tudi „drugi operativni izidi“, „finančni izidi“ in „izid izrednih dogodkov“ bi morali biti razdeljeni na storitve.
i.e. ‘Costs of products, goods and materials sold’, ‘Selling costs’, ‘General and administrative costs’ and ‘Interest from liabilities financing postal services including foreign exchange rate differences’ (See point 2.2 of the ‘Ordinance’).
Tj. „stroški izdelave“, „stroški prodaje“, „stroški splošne uprave“ ter „stroški izvajanja obveznosti, nastalih za financiranje določene poštne storitve ali skupine poštnih storitev in z njimi povezanih tečajnih razlik“ (glej točko 2(2) odloka).
[…] having regard to the principle, that the total amount of compensation cannot exceed the difference between costs of universal postal services provisions and revenue, which is obtained from these services.
„[…] če upoštevamo načelo, da je celotni znesek nadomestila ne sme presegati razlike med stroški zagotavljanja univerzalnih poštnih storitev in prihodki iz tega naslova“.
Costs for the year 2006
Stroški v letu 2006
direct costs
neposredni stroški
indirect costs:
posredni stroški
operating costs
operativni stroški
transport costs
stroški prevoza
network maintenance costs
stroški vzdrževanja omrežja
other indirect costs
drugi posredni stroški
COST OF PROVIDING SERVICES
STROŠEK ZAGOTAVLJANJA STORITVE
general and administrative costs:
stroški splošnega upravljanja:
selling and commercial costs
stroški prodaje in trgovanja
financial costs
finančni stroški
Other operating costs
Drugi operativni stroški
TOTAL COSTS
STROŠKI SKUPAJ
Revenues for the year 2006
Prihodki v letu 2006
Revenue from sales
Prihodki iz prodaje
Other operating revenues
Drugi operativni prihodki
TOTAL REVENUES
PRIHODKI SKUPAJ
Results within the postal services area — Year 2006
Poslovni izidi na področju poštnih storitev – leto 2006
(thousand PLN)
(v tisočih PLN)
Universal
Univerzalne
Total universal
Univerzalne skupaj
Non-universal services
Storitve, ki ne spadajo med univerzalne storitve
Total Postal services
Poštne storitve skupaj
Reserved
Rezervirane
Non-reserved
Nerezervirane
Total revenues
Prihodki skupaj
Direct costs
Neposredni stroški
Exploitation costs (technological of services)
Obratovalni stroški (tehnološke storitve)
Costs of delivery of postal matter
Stroški prevoza poštnih pošiljk
Fixed costs of maintaining postal network
Stalni stroški vzdrževanja poštnega omrežja
General enterprise costs
Splošni in upravni stroški
Selling costs
Stroški prodaje
Financial costs
Finančni stroški
Total Costs
Stroški skupaj
Result
Poslovni izid
Results of the universal postal service — 2006-2011
Poslovni izidi iz opravljanja univerzalne poštne storitve – 2006–2011
Revenues of Universal Postal Service
Prihodki iz opravljanja univerzalne poštne storitve
Revenues of the public service obligation [2]
Prihodki, ki temeljijo na obveznosti opravljanja javne storitve [2]
Costs of Universal Postal Service
Stroški opravljanja univerzalne poštne storitve
Costs of the public service obligation [4]
Stroški, povezani z izpolnjevanjem obveznosti javne storitve [4]
Operating costs (technological services)
Obratovalni stroški (tehnološke storitve)
Cost of effecting postal deliveries
Strošek prevoza poštnih pošiljk
Fixed costs of maintaining the postal network
Stalni stroški vzdrževanja poštne mreže
General costs (Enterprise-wide costs)
Splošni stroški (splošni in upravni stroški)
Forecast figures.
Napovedani podatki.
Extraordinary revenues not included.
Brez upoštevanja poslovnega izida izrednih dogodkov.
Extraordinary costs were not included.
Brez upoštevanja stroškov izrednih dogodkov.
Poland submitted its comments by letter of 9 August 2005.
Poljska je predložila svoje pripombe z dopisom z dne 9. avgusta 2005.
A meeting between the Polish authorities and the Commission was held on 10 January 2006.
Srečanje med poljskimi organi in Komisijo je potekalo 10. januarja 2006.
By decision of 9 January 2007, the Commission decided to terminate partially the proceedings under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid C 21/05: Aid to PP for carrying out the universal postal service for the period 2004-2005, because it has become without object since the aid was not implemented in 2004 and 2005.
Komisija je 9. januarja 2007 odločila, da delno konča postopke iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES glede pomoči C 21/05: Pomoč družbi Poczta Polska za izvajanje univerzalnih poštnih storitev v letih 2004–2005, ker so postali brezpredmetni, saj se pomoč v letih 2004 in 2005 ni izvajala.
The proceedings under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty remained open as for the period 1 January 2006 onwards [6].
Postopki iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES za obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 dalje ostajajo odprti [6].
PP held the status of Public Utility Company and exercised its activities on the basis of ‘Act of 30 July 1997 on State Enterprise of public utility PP’.
Družba Poczta Polska je imela status javnega podjetja in je opravljala dejavnost na podlagi Zakona o javni družbi Poczta Polska z dne 30. julija 1997.
In its decision of 24 April 2007 concerning State aid case E 12/05: Unlimited State Guarantee to Poczta Polska, the Commission considered that the impossibility for PP to go bankrupt because of its legal status provided the undertaking with an unlimited State guarantee [7].
V odločbi z dne 24. aprila 2007 v zvezi z državno pomočjo v zadevi št. E 12/05: Neomejeno državno jamstvo družbi Poczta Polska je Komisija sklenila, da dejstvo, da zaradi pravnega statusa ni mogoče dopustiti stečaja družbe Poczta Polska, družbi zagotavlja neomejeno jamstvo države [7].
On 25 June 2008, Poland informed the Commission of the entry into force on 25 April 2008 of a new law dated 11 April 2008 amending the one providing PP the impossibility to be subject to ordinary bankruptcy proceedings.
Poljska je 25. junija 2008 obvestila Komisijo, da je 25. aprila 2008 začel veljati novi zakon z dne 11. aprila 2008, ki spreminja zakon, na podlagi katerega za družbo Poczta Polska ne veljajo običajna pravila stečajnega postopka.
On the basis of the new law, it was not clear to the Commission though what legal regime applies to PP since its legal status did not appear to have been changed.
Vendar na podlagi novega zakona Komisija ni dobila jasne predstave o pravnem sistemu, ki se uporablja v zvezi z družbo PP, ker se je zdelo, da se njen pravni status ni spremenil.
According to Poland, the National Regulatory Authority (UKE) has effectively evaluated, among other issues, to what extent PP fulfilled the requirements resulting from Article 52 of the Postal Law and the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 24 December 2003.
Po mnenju Poljske je nacionalni regulativni organ (UKE) med drugim učinkovito ovrednotil, v kakšni meri je družba Poczta Polska izpolnila zahteve iz člena 52 Zakona o poštnih storitvah in Odloka ministra za finance z dne 24. decembra 2003.
In this examination it has always been concluded that (i) unit cost calculation is performed for each service from the reserved area and (ii) cost calculation procedures covered separately non-reserved universal postal services and services which do not belong to universal postal services meaning that PP kept its account books and cost statement in compliance with the requirements specified in Article 52 section 1 of the Postal Law.
Ta preiskava je vsakokrat pokazala, da (i) se izračun stroškov na enoto opravlja za vsako storitev z rezerviranega področja in da (ii) so bile v postopkih izračuna stroškov ločeno zajete nerezervirane univerzalne poštne storitve in storitve, ki niso univerzalne poštne storitve, kar pomeni, da je družba PP vodila svoje računovodske knjige in pripravljala prikaze stroškov v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 52(1) Zakona o poštnih storitvah.
The relative importance of these costs and revenues, for which an allocation is not foreseen in the national provisions, accounted for 2,5 % and 1,5 % of their respective totals in the year 2006.
Relativni pomen teh stroškov in prihodkov, za katere nacionalnih predpisi niso predvideli razporejanja, je temu primerno znašalo 2,5 % in 1,5 % njihovih vsot leta 2006.
Although the cost and revenues that have not been allocated to services can be regarded as marginal in the past in view of their relative importance, their importance might be material in the future.
Čeprav bi bilo mogoče stroške in prihodke, ki niso bili razporejeni na storitve, glede na njihov relativni pomen v preteklosti šteti za obrobne, lahko v prihodnosti postanejo bistveni.
According to Article 52(3) Postal Law the operator providing universal postal services shall submit to the President of UKE a declaration on compliance with the requirements, which are referred to in section 1, annually, till 31 March of each year in respect to the preceding year.
V skladu s členom 52(3) Zakona o poštnih storitvah „operater, ki opravlja univerzalne poštne storitve, vsako leto do 31. marca za leto poprej predloži predsedniku UKE izjavo o izpolnjevanju zahtev, določenih v odstavku 1“.
Moreover the President of UKE shall be obliged to verify the compliance with the requirements, which are referred to in sections 1 and 2 of Article 52(4).
Poleg tega mora v skladu s členom 52(4) predsednik UKE preveriti uresničevanje zahtev, določenih v odstavkih 1 in 2 tega zakona.
(000 PLZ)
(000 PLN)
Poland initially requested the Commission to extend the investigation until 2012.
Sprva je Poljska Komisijo prosila, naj razširi preiskavo do leta 2012.
However, in view of the fact that the current rules to assess compatibility of public service compensation i.e. the ‘Community Framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation’ will expire in 2011, the Polish authorities accept an approval of the scheme until the year 2011.
Vendar se poljski organi zavedajo, da sedanja pravila za oceno združljivosti nadomestila za opravljanje javnih storitev, tj. „okvir Skupnosti v zvezi z državno pomočjo v obliki nadomestila za opravljanje javnih storitev“, preneha veljati leta 2011 in zato sprejemajo potrditev sheme do leta 2011.
By the ‘Act of 5 September 2008 on commercialization of the public utility PP’ the ‘Act of 30 July 1997 on State Enterprise of public utility PP’ was partially annulled.
Zakon z dne 5. septembra 2008 o komercializaciji javne družbe Poczta Polska je delno razveljavil Zakon z dne 30. julija 1997 o javni družbi Poczta Polska.
The content of Article 17, concerning subsidies to PP for provision of universal postal services, was transferred to a newly created Article 52a in the existing Act of 12 June 2003.
Vsebina člena 17 o dodelitvi sredstev družbi PP za zagotavljanje univerzalnih poštnih storitev se je prenesla v novi člen 52a v obstoječem zakonu z dne 12. junija 2003.
Decision No 862/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep št. 862/2010/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
of 22 September 2010
z dne 22. septembra 2010
on the participation of the Union in a Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development Programme (BONUS) undertaken by several Member States
o sodelovanju Unije pri skupnem raziskovalnem in razvojnem programu za Baltsko morje (BONUS), ki ga izvaja več držav članic
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 185 and 188, second paragraph, thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 185 in drugega odstavka člena 188 Pogodbe,
Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) [3] (the Seventh Framework Programme) provides for Community participation in research and development programmes undertaken by several Member States, including participation in the structures created for the execution of those programmes, within the meaning of Article 169 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty).
V Sklepu št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sedmi okvirni program) je predvideno sodelovanje Skupnosti v raziskovalnih in razvojnih programih, ki jih izvaja več držav članic, ter v strukturah, vzpostavljenih za izvajanje teh programov, v smislu člena 169 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pogodba ES).
Council Decision 2006/971/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the Specific Programme Cooperation implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) [4] encourages a cross-thematic approach to research topics relevant to one or more themes of the Seventh Framework Programme, and in this context identified an initiative under Article 169 of the EC Treaty in the field of Joint Baltic Sea research as one of the fields suitable for Community participation in jointly implemented national research programmes.
Z Odločbo Sveta 2006/971/ES z dne 19. decembra 2006 o posebnem programu Sodelovanje za izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) [4] se spodbuja večtematski pristop k raziskovalnim temam, ki ustrezajo eni ali več temam sedmega okvirnega programa, in v tem okviru je bila pobuda na podlagi člena 169 Pogodbe ES za skupne raziskave Baltskega morja opredeljena kot eno od področij, primernih za sodelovanje Skupnosti pri skupnem izvajanju nacionalnih raziskovalnih programov.
The Baltic Sea ecosystem, a semi-land locked European inland sea, is one of the world’s largest brackish water bodies and has been seriously affected by many natural pressures and pressures caused by human activity, such as pollution from dumped chemical weapons, for example war gases dating back to the Second World War, and from heavy metal compounds, organic substances, radioactive material, and heating oil and petroleum spills.
Ekosistem Baltskega morja, polzaprtega evropskega notranjega morja, je eno največjih svetovnih vodnih teles s somornico, ki čuti resne posledice številnih naravnih pritiskov in pritiskov, ki so posledica človekovega delovanja, kot so onesnaženje z odvrženim kemičnim orožjem, na primer bojni plini, iz druge svetovne vojne in spojinami težkih kovin, organskimi snovmi, radioaktivnim materialom ter razlitji kurilnega olja in nafte.
The development of agriculture in the Baltic Sea drainage basin has likewise caused excessive inputs of fertilisers and organic material leading to advanced eutrophication, and the introduction of non-endemic alien organisms into the environment.
Razvoj kmetijstva v povodju Baltskega morja je prav tako povzročil visoko stopnjo evtrofikacije zaradi čezmernega vnosa gnojil in organskih snovi ter vnosa neendemičnih tujih organizmov v okolje.
The unsustainable exploitation of fish stocks and climate change are causing the loss of original biodiversity.
Netrajnostno izkoriščanje staležev rib in podnebne spremembe povzročajo izgubo prvotne biotske raznovrstnosti.
Those factors, as well as continuing human activity, including infrastructure projects directly on and in the immediate vicinity of the coast and in the Baltic Sea drainage basin, and ecologically unsustainable tourism, are degrading the natural environment.
Ti dejavniki, pa tudi stalna človekova dejavnost, vključno z infrastrukturnimi projekti neposredno na obali in v njeni neposredni bližini ter v povodju Baltskega morja, ter ekološko netrajnostni turizem poslabšujejo naravno okolje.
All this is seriously reducing the capacity of the Baltic Sea to sustainably provide the goods and services upon which people depend directly and indirectly for social, cultural and economic benefits.
Vse to močno zmanjšuje zmožnost Baltskega morja, da bi trajnostno zagotavljalo dobrine in storitve, od katerih so ljudje neposredno ali posredno odvisni zaradi družbenih, kulturnih in gospodarskih koristi.
The European Council of 14 December 2007 highlighted concern for the status of the environment in the Baltic Sea, as reflected in the Communication from the Commission of 10 June 2009 to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju 14. decembra 2007 poudaril zaskrbljenost zaradi stanja okolja v Baltskem morju, predstavljenega v sporočilu Komisije z dne 10. junija 2009 Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o Strategiji Evropske unije za regijo Baltskega morja.
Moreover, the Council invited the Commission to present a proposal for an initiative under Article 169 of the EC Treaty for the Baltic Sea Region.
Poleg tega je Svet Komisijo pozval, naj predloži predlog pobude na podlagi člena 169 Pogodbe ES za regijo Baltskega morja.
Science should contribute to addressing such challenges and finding solutions to the urgent environmental problems in the Baltic Sea.
Znanost bi morala prispevati k reševanju takšnih izzivov in iskanju rešitev za nujne okoljske težave v Baltskem morju.
However, the gravity of the present situation calls for a qualitative and quantitative stepping-up of current research in the Baltic region through the development and implementation of a fully-integrated approach whereby the relevant research programmes of all the bordering States can be streamlined and focused in order to address the complex and urgent issues in a coordinated, efficient and effective manner.
Vendar bi bilo treba zaradi resnosti sedanjega stanja kakovostno in količinsko okrepiti zdajšnje raziskave v baltski regiji z razvojem in izvedbo v celoti povezanega pristopa, s katerim se zadevni raziskovalni programi vseh držav, ki mejijo na Baltsko morje, lahko racionalizirajo in osredotočijo na zapletena in nujna vprašanja, da bi se nanje usklajeno, učinkovito in uspešno odgovorilo.
At present, a number of research and development programmes or activities undertaken by Member States individually at national level to support research and development in the Baltic Sea region are not sufficiently coordinated at Union level to achieve the critical mass required in strategic research and development areas.
Številni raziskovalni in razvojni programi ali dejavnosti, ki jih posamezne države članice izvajajo na nacionalni ravni, da bi podprle raziskave in razvoj v regiji Baltskega morja, so za zdaj premalo usklajeni na ravni Unije, da bi dosegli kritično maso, potrebno na strateških raziskovalnih in razvojnih področjih.
Furthermore, existing sector-specific research structures, which have evolved throughout a long history of national policies, are deeply rooted in national governance systems and prevent the development and funding of the multi-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary environmental research needed to address the Baltic Sea challenges.
Poleg tega so obstoječe sektorske raziskovalne strukture, ki so se razvijale skozi dolgo obdobje nacionalnih politik, globoko zakoreninjene v nacionalnih sistemih upravljanja ter preprečujejo razvoj in financiranje multidisciplinarnih, interdisciplinarnih in transdisciplinarnih okoljskih raziskav, ki so potrebne za reševanje izzivov Baltskega morja.
While there is a long tradition of Baltic Sea research cooperation with countries both within and outside the Baltic Sea area, collaborative efforts have so far lacked adequate financial resources for the optimal exploitation of the research potential due to the unequal economic and development situation in those countries as well as highly diverse national research agendas, research themes and priorities.
Kljub dolgi tradiciji sodelovanja med državami tako v baltski regiji kot zunaj nje pri raziskavah Baltskega morja je bilo do zdaj zaradi neenakega gospodarskega položaja in stopnje razvitosti teh držav ter zelo različnih nacionalnih raziskovalnih programov, tem in prednostnih nalog za sodelovanje na voljo premalo finančnih sredstev, da bi se možnosti za raziskave kar najbolje izkoristile.
The Commission, in its work programme for 2007-2008 of 11 June 2007 for the implementation of the Specific Programme Cooperation, provided financial support to BONUS ERA-NET and ERA-NET PLUS in the field of Baltic Sea environmental research in order to strengthen cooperation between environmental research funding agencies in the Baltic region and facilitate the transition to a joint research and development programme in the Baltic Sea to be implemented on the basis of Article 169 of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je v delovnem programu za obdobje 2007–2008 z dne 11. junija 2007 za izvajanje posebnega programa Sodelovanje zagotovila finančno podporo shemama BONUS ERA-NET in ERA-NET PLUS na področju okoljskih raziskav Baltskega morja, da bi okrepila sodelovanje med agencijami za financiranje okoljskih raziskav v baltski regiji in olajšala prehod na skupni raziskovalni in razvojni program za Baltsko morje, ki se bo izvajal na podlagi člena 169 Pogodbe ES.
By and large, BONUS ERA-NET and ERA-NET PLUS have worked well and it is thus important to ensure the continuity of the research efforts in order to address the pressing environmental challenges.
Na splošno BONUS ERA-NET in ERA-NET PLUS dobro delujeta, zato je pomembno zagotoviti kontinuiteto raziskovalnih prizadevanj, da bi obravnavali nujne okoljske izzive.
In line with the approach of the Seventh Framework Programme and as acknowledged in the consultations with stakeholders undertaken during BONUS ERA-NET, there is a need for policy-driven research programmes in the Baltic region.
V skladu s pristopom iz sedmega okvirnega programa in kot je bilo potrjeno v posvetovanjih z zainteresiranimi stranmi, ki so potekala v okviru BONUS ERA-NET-a, so za baltsko regijo potrebni na politiki temelječi usmerjeni raziskovalni programi.
Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland and Sweden (the Participating States) have agreed to jointly undertake the Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development Programme BONUS (‘BONUS’).
Danska, Nemčija, Estonija, Latvija, Litva, Poljska, Finska in Švedska (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodelujoče države) so se dogovorile, da bodo skupaj izvajale skupni raziskovalni in razvojni program za Baltsko morje BONUS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BONUS).
BONUS aims to support scientific development and innovation by providing the necessary legal and organisational framework for trans-national cooperation between the Baltic Sea States on environmental research in the Baltic Sea region.
Namen BONUS-a je podpirati znanstveni razvoj in inovacije z zagotavljanjem potrebnega pravnega in organizacijskega okvira za nadnacionalno sodelovanje med baltskimi državami na področju okoljskih raziskav v regiji Baltskega morja.
While largely focused on environmental research, BONUS cuts across a number of related Union research programmes on a range of human activities having accumulated impacts on ecosystems such as fisheries, aquaculture, agriculture, infrastructure (including in the field of energy), transport, training and mobility of researchers as well as socioeconomic issues.
Čeprav je BONUS pretežno usmerjen v okoljske raziskave, pa zadeva številne sorodne raziskovalne programe Unije o različnih človekovih dejavnostih, ki imajo kumulativni učinek na ekosisteme, kot so ribištvo, akvakultura, kmetijstvo, infrastruktura (tudi na področju energije), promet, usposabljanje in mobilnost raziskovalcev ter družbeno-gospodarska vprašanja.