natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Further, if this submission were to be accepted, there would be no State aid where a Member State granted a subsidy to bridge the gap between a price freely negotiated between two market operators and the theoretical price at which agreement might have been arrived at in conditions of full competition.
Poleg tega, če bi bila ta navedba sprejeta, ne bi bilo državne pomoči, pri kateri država članica dodeli subvencijo za zapolnitev vrzeli med ceno, prosto dogovorjeno med dvema udeležencema na trgu, in teoretično ceno, za katero bi se lahko sklenil dogovor pod pogoji popolne konkurence.
This would defeat the fundamental purpose of State aid control.
S tem bi bil izničen temeljni namen nadzora državne pomoči.
The scheme was to have ended on 30 June 2007.
Shema bi se morala zaključiti 30. junija 2007.
OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1. The second sentence of Article 1(b)(v) of the Regulation reads: ‘Where certain measures become aid following the liberalisation of an activity by Community law, such measures shall not be considered as existing aid after the date fixed for liberalisation’.
UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1 Drugi stavek člena 1(b)(v) Uredbe določa: „Če nekateri ukrepi postanejo pomoč zaradi liberalizacije dejavnosti s pravnimi predpisi Skupnosti, se takšni ukrepi ne štejejo kot veljavna pomoč po datumu, določenem za liberalizacijo“.
However, its implementation was discontinued on instructions from the AEEG soon after the Commission opened the formal investigation in November 2004 [11].
Vendar je bilo njeno izvajanje po navodilih AEEG prekinjeno kmalu po tem, ko je Komisija sprožila formalni postopek preiskave novembra 2004 [11].
In Sardinia, E.ON can set the price for 67 % of the hours, and ENEL for 29 % of the hours. If adjacent zones are also considered, ENEL is price-setting in the macrozone Macrosud-Sardegna for 63 % of the hours. In the MacroSud region, ENEL is price-setting for 100 % of the hours.
Na Sardiniji lahko E.ON določi ceno za 67 % ur, ENEL pa za 29 % ur. Če se upoštevajo tudi sosednja območja, ENEL določa ceno na makroobmočju Macrosud-Sardegna za 63 % ur. Vendar v regiji MacroSud ENEL določa ceno za 100 % ur.
on State aid C 88/97 implemented by France in favour of Crédit Mutuel
o državni pomoči C 88/97, ki jo je Francoska republika odobrila podjetju Crédit Mutuel
Having given interested parties notice to submit their comments pursuant to those Articles [1], and having regard to those comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 25 January 1991 the Association française des banques (AFB), the Chambre syndicale des banques populaires and Crédit Agricole lodged a complaint alleging that France had granted State aid to Crédit Mutuel.
Association française des banques (v nadaljnjem besedilu: AFB), Chambre syndicale des banques populaires in Crédit Agricole so 25. januarja 1991 vložili pritožbo, v kateri so trdili, da je Francija odobrila državno pomoč za Crédit Mutuel.
The Commission first requested information concerning the Livret bleu in a letter dated 27 May 1991.
Komisija je prvo zahtevo za informacije o shemi Livret bleu poslala z dopisom z dne 27. maja 1991.
By letter dated 6 February 1998, the Commission informed the French authorities that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (now Article 108(2) TFEU) in respect of the potential aid measures contained in the Livret bleu savings vehicle [2].
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 6. februarja 1998 francoskim organom sporočila, da bo začela postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 108(2) PDEU) glede morebitnih ukrepov pomoči v varčevalni shemi „Livret bleu“ [2].
On 8 April 1998 the French authorities replied to the questions raised by the Commission in its opening Decision.
Francoski organi so 8. aprila 1998 odgovorili na vprašanja, ki jih je Komisija postavila v odločitvi o začetku postopka.
Crédit Mutuel sent a letter to the Commission on 18 June 1998 setting out arguments to reject the description of the measures covered by the opening Decision as State aid, together with a cost account files concerning the Livret bleu.
Crédit Mutuel je 18. junija 1998 Komisiji poslala dopis s predstavitvijo argumentov, s katerimi je želela zavrniti opredelitev ukrepov, na katere se je nanašala odločitev o začetku postopka, kot državne pomoči, in analitične računovodske evidence sheme Livret bleu.
A number of interested parties also submitted their comments to the Commission (see Sections 3 and 4, recitals 48 to 59), which forwarded them to the French authorities on 3 September 1998.
Komisija je prejela tudi pripombe številnih zainteresiranih strani (glej oddelka 3 in 4, uvodne izjave 48 do 59) in jih francoskim organom posredovala 3. septembra 1998.
The complainants sent four additional written statements to the Commission by letters dated 29 October 1999, 16 May 2000, 16 October 2000 and 19 January 2001, which the Commission forwarded to the French authorities on 21 February 2000 and 3 November 2000.
Pritožniki so Komisiji poslali štiri dopolnilne izjave v dopisih z dne 29. oktobra 1999, 16. maja 2000, 16. oktobra 2000 in 19. januarja 2001, ki jih je Komisija posredovala francoskim organom 21. februarja 2000 in 3. novembra 2000.
On 5 February 2001, the Commission forwarded to France the documents received from the AFB.
Komisija je 5. februarja 2001 francoskim organom posredovala dokumente, ki jih je prejela od AFB.
From November 1998 to December 1999, at the Commission’s request, a consultant [3] (hereinafter: ‘the Commission’s consultant’) carried out an audit of the cost accounts of the Livret bleu.
Svetovalec [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: svetovalec Komisije) je od novembra 1998 do decembra 1999 na zahtevo Komisije opravil revizijo analitičnih računovodskih evidenc sheme Livret bleu.
By letter dated 14 September 1999, the Commission asked the French authorities to explain the general interest tasks entrusted to Crédit Mutuel.
Službe Komisije so z dopisom z dne 14. septembra 1999 zaprosile francoske organe, naj natančneje pojasnijo naloge splošnega pomena, za katere je pooblaščena Crédit Mutuel.
On 21 February 2000, 3 November 2000 and 5 February 2001, the Commission sent to the French authorities for comment various documents [4] submitted to the file by the complainants concerning the potential ‘pull effect’ of the Livret bleu (see subsection 7.2.3, recitals 110-118).
Službe Komisije so 21. februarja 2000, 3. novembra 2000 in 5. februarja 2001 francoskim organom za pripravo pripomb posredovale različne dokumente [4], ki so jih v spis vložili pritožniki in so se nanašali na morebitni „učinek vabe“ sheme Livret bleu (glej uvodne izjave 110 do 118 pododdelka 7.2.3).
The French authorities presented their comments on 1 February 2001.
Francoski organi so pripombe predložili 1. februarja 2001.
On 11 April 2000, the European Banking Federation (EBF) lodged a complaint with the Commission against the aid granted by the French State to Crédit Mutuel in the form of exclusive rights to distribute the Livret bleu.
Komisija je 11. aprila 2000 prejela pritožbo Združenja evropskih bank (EBF) v zvezi s pomočjo, ki jo je Francija odobrila Crédit Mutuel v obliki izključne pravice do distribuiranja sheme Livret bleu.
In May 2000 the Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel commissioned the Arthur Andersen accountancy firm to review the methodology used in the Crédit Mutuel cost accounts and to draw up the operating statement for the Livret bleu.
Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel je maja 2000 pooblastila revizijsko družbo Arthur Andersen, da opravi pregled metodologije za izdelavo analitičnih računovodskih evidenc Crédit Mutuel in pripravi izkaz poslovnega izida sheme Livret bleu.
This task was completed in September 2000 with the submission of a detailed report on the Livret bleu operating statement, which assessed the result of the Livret bleu cost accounts at a pre-tax loss of FRF 498 million.
Ta naloga je bila končana septembra 2000, ko je bilo izdano podrobno poročilo o izkazu poslovnega izida sheme Livret bleu, v katerem je bil poslovni izid v analitičnih računovodskih evidencah sheme Livret bleu ocenjen na izgubo pred obdavčitvijo v višini 498 milijonov FRF.
This conclusion was based on the taking into account of ‘adjustments’.
Ta ugotovitev je temeljila na upoštevanju „popravkov“.
A meeting on this report was organised on 2 February 2001 for the Commission and Crédit Mutuel.
2. februarja 2001 je bil organiziran sestanek med Komisijo in Crédit Mutuel v zvezi s tem poročilom.
Following observations by the Commission, Crédit Mutuel asked Arthur Andersen to forward a memo dated 8 February 2001 justifying the method used, namely ‘correction of the excess weighting granted to the IARD insurance activity (Crédit Mutuel’s general insurance business [5]) ’, which had been criticised by the Commission.
Crédit Mutuel je po pripombah Komisije od družbe Arthur Andersen zahtevala, naj ji posreduje obvestilo z dne 8. februarja 2001, v katerem je bila utemeljena uporabljena metoda, imenovana „popravek preobremenitve dejavnosti IARD [dejavnost odškodninskega zavarovanja [5] Crédit Mutuel] “, ki so jo službe Komisije zlasti kritizirale.
In April 2001 the Commission asked its consultant to identify the differences between its report and that of Arthur Andersen and to determine the changes to data or methodology that could, if necessary, be included in its previous report.
Komisija je aprila 2001 zaprosila svetovalca, naj poišče razlike med svojim poročilom in poročilom družbe Arthur Andersen ter opredeli spremembe podatkov ali metodologije, ki bi jih bilo po potrebi mogoče vključiti v njegovo prejšnje poročilo.
A new final report from the Commission consultant was handed over on 23 July 2001.
Komisija je novo končno poročilo svetovalca prejela 23. julija 2001.
It evaluates the result of the Livret bleu cost accounts at a cumulated non-capitalised profit of FRF 1,074 billion (EUR 163,7 million).
V njem je poslovni izid v analitičnih računovodskih evidencah sheme Livret bleu ocenjen na nekapitalizirani skupni dobiček v višini 1,074 milijarde FRF (163,7 milijona EUR).
The report was sent to the French authorities on the same day.
Poročilo je bilo še isti dan posredovano francoskim organom.
At a meeting on 26 July 2001 between the Commission, the French authorities, Crédit Mutuel and Arthur Andersen, Crédit Mutuel and Arthur Andersen announced that they disagreed with the final conclusions of the Commission’s consultant.
Na sestanku Komisije, francoskih organov ter družb Crédit Mutuel in Arthur Andersen 26. julija 2001 se zadnji nista strinjali s končnimi ugotovitvami svetovalca Komisije.
The memo sent to the Commission by the French authorities on 26 October 2001 explained why, according to them, (i) the Livret bleu scheme did not constitute State aid; (ii) if the Commission did classify the scheme as aid, it could only be existing aid, and (iii) in any event it was compatible aid.
Francoski organi so v obvestilu, ki so ga 26. oktobra 2001 poslali Komisiji, pojasnili, zakaj po njihovem mnenju (i) shema Livret bleu ni pomoč, (ii) je to ob domnevi, da bi Komisija ohranila opredelitev pomoči, lahko le obstoječa pomoč, in (iii) je to v vsakem primeru združljiva pomoč.
By Decision of 15 January 2002 [6] (hereinafter: ‘the annulled Decision’), the Commission declared the State aid granted by France to Crédit Mutuel incompatible with the common market.
Komisija je v odločbi z dne 15. januarja 2002 [6] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: razveljavljena odločba) razglasila, da je državna pomoč, ki jo je Francoska republika izvedla v korist Crédit Mutuel, nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The Decision of 15 January 2002 was annulled by judgment of the Court of First Instance on 18 January 2005 [7].
Odločba z dne 15. januarja 2002 je bila razglašena za nično s sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 18. januarja 2005 [7].
The Commission did not appeal against the judgment.
Komisija ni vložila pritožbe zoper sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje.
In accordance with Article 266(1) TFEU, the Commission is required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment.
V skladu s členom 266(1) PDEU mora sprejeti ukrepe, potrebne za izvršitev te sodbe.
With regard to State aid, this means that, following the annulment of the Decision, the procedure is returned to the formal investigation stage.
To na področju državnih pomoči pomeni, da se po razglasitvi odločbe za nično znova začne formalni postopek preiskave.
By Decision of 7 June 2006 [8] (hereinafter: ‘the extension Decision’), the Commission extended the formal investigation procedure and clarified the purpose of its assessment of potential aid.
Komisija je z odločitvijo z dne 7. junija 2006 [8] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločitev o razširitvi postopka) razširila formalni postopek preiskave in pojasnila predmet svoje ocene morebitne pomoči.
France submitted its comments on the extension Decision to the Commission by letters dated 1 September 2006 and 7 September 2006.
Francija je Komisiji poslala pripombe o odločitvi o razširitvi postopka v dopisih z dne 1. septembra 2006 in 7. septembra 2006.
On 19 September 2006 the Commission received a complaint from the Association des Victimes du Crédit Mutuel (Association of Victims of Crédit Mutuel).
(19) Evropska komisija je 19. septembra 2006 prejela pritožbo „Association des Victimes du Crédit Mutuel“ (Združenje žrtev Crédit Mutuel).
The Commission received the comments of Crédit Mutuel by letter dated 13 October 2006.
Komisija je pripombe Crédit Mutuel prejela v dopisu z dne 13. oktobra 2006.
By letter dated 31 October 2006, the Commission forwarded the observations by Crédit Mutuel to the French authorities.
Komisija je pripombe Crédit Mutuel posredovala francoskim organom v dopisu z dne 31. oktobra 2006.
Following two requests for further information from the Commission dated 22 September 2006 and 28 November 2006, France submitted additional comments by letters dated 8 November 2006 and 28 February 2007.
Francija je po dveh zahtevah Komisije za dodatne informacije z dne 22. septembra 2006 in 28. novembra 2006 poslala dodatne pripombe v dopisih z dne 8. novembra 2006 in 28. februarja 2007.
The Commission met the French authorities on 19 December 2006 and Crédit Mutuel on 15 January 2007.
Komisija se je s francoskimi organi sestala 19. decembra 2006, s Crédit Mutuel pa 15. januarja 2007.
On 10 May 2007 the Commission adopted a decision pursuant to Article 86(3) of the EC Treaty (now Article 106(3) TFEU) in conjunction with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty (now Articles 49 and 56 TFEU) requiring France to put an end to the special rights [9] of Crédit Mutuel, Caisses d’Épargne and Banque Populaire for the distribution of the Livret bleu (Crédit Mutuel) and Livret A (Caisses d’Épargne and Banque Postale) [10].
Komisija je 10. maja 2007 na podlagi člena 86(3) Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 106(3) PDEU) v povezavi s členoma 43 in 49 Pogodbe ES (zdaj člena 49 in 56 PDEU) sprejela odločbo, v skladu s katero mora Francija ukiniti posebne pravice [9] Crédit Mutuel, Caisses d’Épargne in Banque Populaire za distribuiranje sheme Livret bleu (kar zadeva Crédit Mutuel) in sheme Livret A (kar zadeva Caisses d’Épargne in La Poste) [10].
Since France did not put an end to the special rights for the distribution of the Livret A and Livret bleu within the nine-month deadline set by the Decision of 10 May 2007, the Commission opened infringement proceedings pursuant to Article 226 of the EC Treaty (now Article 258 TFEU) by sending France on 5 June 2008 a letter of formal notice for not complying with the Decision.
Ker Francija posebnih pravic za distribuiranje shem Livret A in Livret bleu ni ukinila v devetih mesecih, kot je bilo določeno v odločbi z dne 10. maja 2007, je Komisija začela postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev iz člena 226 Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 258 PDEU), o katerem je Francijo obvestila v pisnem opominu z dne 5. junija 2008 zaradi neupoštevanja odločbe.
On 19 September 2009 the Commission asked France for more information, which was provided on 13 October 2009.
Komisija je 19. septembra 2009 od Francije zahtevala nove informacije, in te je Francija poslala 13. oktobra 2009.
On 8 October 2009 the Commission terminated the infringement proceedings because France, by adopting the reform of 1 January 2009 liberalising the distribution of the Livret A and Livret bleu [11], had complied with its obligation to put an end to the special rights for the distribution of the livrets [12].
Komisija je 8. oktobra 2009 končala postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, saj je Francija s sprejetjem reforme 1. januarja 2009 o liberalizaciji distribuiranja shem Livret A in Livret bleu [11] izpolnila obveznost ukinitve posebnih pravic za distribuiranje teh shem [12].
Over the course of 2010 the Commission sent e-mails with several questions to Crédit Mutuel, to which e-mailed replies were received.
Komisija je leta 2010 v elektronskih dopisih, poslanih Crédit Mutuel, postavila več vprašanj, na katere je ta prav tako odgovorila po elektronski pošti.
This Decision closes, pursuant to Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [13], the procedure relating to the potential aid contained in the Livret bleu savings vehicle.
S tem sklepom se v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [13] končuje postopek o morebitnih elementih pomoči, ki jih vsebuje shema Livret bleu.
DESCRIPTION OF THE LIVRET BLEU SAVINGS VEHICLE
OPIS SHEME LIVRET BLEU
Description of Crédit Mutuel
Opis Crédit Mutuel
Crédit Mutuel is a decentralised banking and insurance group consisting of a national network of branches with the status of cooperative companies with open-ended capital.
Crédit Mutuel je decentralizirana bančna in zavarovalniška skupina, ki jo sestavlja nacionalna mreža hranilnic s statusom zadrug s spremenljivim kapitalom.
Crédit Mutuel is governed by the law of 10 September 1947, which laid down the principles of cooperation.
Za Crédit Mutuel velja zakon z dne 10. septembra 1947, v katerem so bila določena načela sodelovanja.
It is organised on three levels: local, regional and national.
Organizirana je na treh ravneh: lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni.
Crédit Mutuel is a group with a single management that pursues a global policy.
Crédit Mutuel je poleg tega skupina z enotno upravo, ki sledi splošni politiki.
It maintains internal financial solidarity at the level of the confederation, which ensures the liquidity of the regional federations.
Ohranja notranjo finančno solidarnost na ravni konfederacije, ki zagotavlja likvidnost regionalnih zvez.
The group has the features of a single undertaking from the perspective of competition law because is has a single decision-making body at central level.
Skupina ima značilnosti enotnega podjetja z vidika konkurenčnega prava, ker ima enotno središče za odločanje na centralni ravni.
Description of the Livret bleu
Opis sheme Livret bleu
The Livret bleu was a savings product regulated by the State and distributed exclusively by Crédit Mutuel.
Livret bleu je bil varčevalni produkt, ki ga je urejala država, distribuirala pa izključno Crédit Mutuel.
The product was partially tax-exempt under the terms of the Amending Finance Act for 1975 [14].
Ta produkt je bil v skladu z zakonom o spremembah javnih financ za leto 1975 [14] delno oproščen davkov.
The interest on sums deposited paid to savers qualified for a tax exemption to the tune of two thirds.
Obresti, ki so bile varčevalcem izplačane od hranilnih vlog, so bile upravičene do davčne oprostitve v višini dveh tretjin.
The State set the gross interest rate on the Livret bleu for savers in such a way that, after deduction of tax [15], the net rate was identical to that earned on the Livret A, which was fully tax-exempt.
Država je določila bruto stopnjo nadomestila za shemo Livret bleu za varčevalce, tako da je bila neto stopnja po plačilu davka [15] enaka neto stopnji za shemo Livret A, ki je bila davkov v celoti oproščena.
The State set the interest rate on the Livret bleu at a level above inflation, indexed to the money market.
Država je za shemo Livret bleu določila stopnjo nadomestila, ki je bila višja od inflacije, indeksirane na denarnem trgu.
The last net rate of remuneration on the Livret bleu before this savings product was discontinued by the reform of 1 January 2009 (see recital 41) was 4 % [16].
Zadnja neto stopnja nadomestila za shemo Livret bleu, preden je bil ta varčevalni produkt ukinjen z reformo z dne 1. januarja 2009 (glej uvodno izjavo 41), je bila 4 % [16].
The maximum amount that savers could deposit in their Livret bleu account was EUR 15300. The amount invested in the Livret bleu rose from EUR 13 billion (FRF 85 billion) in 1991 to EUR 22 billion in 2008.
Največji znesek, ki so ga varčevalci lahko položili na svoj račun Livret bleu, je bil 15300 EUR. Hranilne vloge v shemi Livret bleu so s 13 milijard EUR (85 milijard FRF) leta 1991 narasle na 22 milijard EUR leta 2008.
The Livret bleu’s features — immediate availability of funds, minimum initial deposit authorised from EUR 15, no costs (in particular on opening the account), etc. — led to great liquidity.
Značilnosti sheme Livret bleu – takojšnja razpoložljivost sredstev, dovoljena vplačila od 15 EUR, nič stroškov (zlasti ob odprtju) idr. – so zagotavljale veliko likvidnost.
In addition, it was possible to set up direct debits from the Livret bleu account to the national exchequer or public companies such as EDF or France Télécom.
Poleg tega je bilo v shemi Livret bleu mogoče uvesti neposredne obremenitve v korist državne zakladnice ali javnih podjetij, kot sta EDF ali France Télécom.
The Livret bleu, which was a savings product aimed at the general public, was therefore similar in some respects to a current account.
Shema Livret bleu – varčevalni produkt za posameznike – je bila torej z nekaterih vidikov podobna tekočemu računu.
The obligations associated with the use of the funds collected through the Livret bleu changed over time.
Obveznosti, povezane z uporabo sredstev, zbranih s shemo Livret bleu, so se spreminjale.
Initially Crédit Mutuel was obliged to allocate 50 % of the resources (in 1983 [17] this proportion was increased to 65 % of the resources and 80 % for new deposits) to general-interest uses (notably the financing of local authorities and other public bodies), with the balance being left to the bank to dispose of freely (hereinafter: ‘non-earmarked uses’).
Crédit Mutuel je morala najprej 50 % sredstev (delež, ki se je leta 1983 [17] povečal na 65 % sredstev in 80 % novo zbranih sredstev) dodeliti za tako imenovane naložbe „splošnega pomena“ (zlasti za financiranje lokalnih skupnosti in drugih javnih organov), preostali znesek pa je banka lahko prosto uporabila (v nadaljnjem besedilu: proste naložbe).
Moreover, this radical reform of the system was reflected in a gradual reallocation of existing deposits [20].
Poleg tega so se s temeljito reformo sistema obstoječe hranilne vloge [20] postopno prerazporedile.
Since the Decree of 27 September 1991 until the end of the first half of 1999, the share of existing ‘general-interest uses’ and ‘non-earmarked uses’ fell until all the deposits were allocated to the CDC.
Od odloka z dne 27. septembra 1991 do konca prvega polletja 1999 se je delež obstoječih „naložb splošnega pomena“ in „prostih naložb“ zmanjševal, dokler niso bile vse hranilne vloge dodeljene na račun CDC.
Source: Littlejohn Frazer.
Vir: Littlejohn Frazer
FRF billion and %
V milijardah FRF in %
Annual average deposits
Letne povprečne hranilne vloge
Centralised allocation CDC
Naložbe, centralizirane pri CDC
General-interest uses
Naložbe splošnega pomena
Non-earmarked uses
Proste naložbe
On 1 January 2009 a reform of the Livret A and Livret bleu came into force that granted all banking institutions the right to distribute Livret A accounts and ended the distinction between the Livret A and Livret bleu accounts.
1. januarja 2009 je začela veljati reforma shem Livret A in Livret bleu, s katero je bilo vsem bankam dovoljeno distribuirati shemo Livret A, razlika med shemama Livret A in Livret bleu pa je bila odpravljena.