natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the absence of any comments or findings regarding production, capacity and capacity utilisation, the conclusions in recitals 84 to 85 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s proizvodnjo, zmogljivostjo in izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti ni bilo pripomb ali ugotovitev, se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 84 in 85 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments or findings regarding sales volumes and market share, the conclusions in recitals 86 to 87 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z obsegom prodaje in tržnim deležem ni bilo pripomb ali ugotovitev, se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 86 in 87 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments or findings regarding employment and productivity, the conclusions in recitals 88 to 89 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z zaposlenostjo in produktivnostjo ni bilo pripomb ali ugotovitev, se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 88 in 89 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The dumping margins are specified in recitals 88 to 93.
Stopnje dampinga so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 88 do 93.
It is confirmed that all margins established are significantly above the de minimis level.
Potrjeno je, da so vse stopnje, ki so bile določene, znatno nad stopnjo de minimis.
Given the volumes and the prices of dumped imports, it is therefore confirmed that the impact of the actual margin of dumping cannot be considered negligible.
Glede na obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza je zato potrjeno, da vpliv dejanske stopnje dampinga ne more veljati za zanemarljivega.
One party challenged the correctness of the data provided in recitals 93 to 95 of the provisional Regulation.
Ena stran je izpodbijala pravilnost podatkov iz uvodnih izjav 93 do 95 začasne uredbe.
The party claimed that the value of stocks as a percentage of production over the entire period under consideration was considerably lower than what was listed in Table 10 of the same Regulation.
Stran je trdila, da je bila vrednost zalog kot odstotek proizvodnje skozi celotno obravnavano obdobje znatno nižja od vrednosti, ki je navedena v preglednici 10 iste uredbe.
Those calculations were reviewed and it was found that only the percentage data for 2009 and IP were wrongly calculated, and that in those periods the percentage of stocks was indeed slightly higher than what previously indicated.
Ti izračuni so bili pregledani, pri čemer je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bili napačno izračunani le podatki o deležih za leto 2009 in OP ter da je bil v teh obdobjih delež zalog dejansko nekoliko višji od predhodno navedenega deleža.
A correct version of this calculation is contained in Table 1 of this Regulation.
Pravilna različica tega izračuna je v preglednici 1 te uredbe.
The same party alleged that if the Union industry was forced to increase its stock level up to 6 months of production, as stated in recital 94 of the provisional Regulation, that would represent a stock percentage of 50 % over the total production, rather than 59 % as shown in Table 10 of the provisional Regulation.
Ista stran je trdila, da če je bila industrija Unije prisiljena povečati obseg svojih zalog vse do šestmesečne proizvodnje, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 94 začasne uredbe, bi to predstavljalo delež zalog v višini 50 % nad celotno proizvodnjo in ne 59 %, kot je navedeno v preglednici 10 začasne uredbe.
In this respect it should be underlined that the analyses made in recitals 93 and 94 of the provisional Regulation were complementary but not identical.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da sta bili analizi iz uvodnih izjav 93 in 94 začasne uredbe dopolnilni, vendar ne enaki.
The first analysis showed the percentage of stocks of the sampled companies measured in square metres compared to the production of the sampled companies, also expressed in square metres (61 % for the IP).
V prvi analizi je bil prikazan delež zalog vzorčenih družb, merjenih v kvadratnih metrih, v primerjavi s proizvodnjo vzorčenih družb, prav tako izraženo v kvadratnih metrih (61 % za OP).
The second analysis, also for the sampled companies, showed the number of months of production stocked in relation to the 12 months of the year (50 % for the IP).
V drugi analizi, ki se je prav tako nanašala na vzorčene družbe, je bilo prikazano število mesecev proizvodnje zalog glede na dvanajst mesecev v letu (50 % za OP).
Further analysis allowed the fine-tuning of the assessment of the evolution on the number of months of production being stocked.
Nadaljnja analiza je omogočila izboljšanje ocene razvoja števila mesecev proizvodnje zalog.
In this respect, in 2007 the sampled producers kept around 5 months of production (43 %) but the pressure of the dumped imports forced them to increase stocks to more than 7 months of production (corresponding to 61 % of total yearly production) during the IP.
V tem smislu so imeli vzorčeni proizvajalci leta 2007 zaloge približno petmesečne proizvodnje (43 %), vendar jih je pritisk dampinškega uvoza prisilil k povečanju zalog na več kot sedem mesecev proizvodnje (kar ustreza 61 % celotne letne proizvodnje) med OP.
Table 1 expresses the stocks volumes also under the form of number of months over the yearly production.
V preglednici 1 je količina zalog izražena tudi v obliki števila mesecev v primerjavi z letno proizvodnjo.
Stock (thousands m2)
Zaloge (v tisoč m2)
Number of months stocked compared to annual production
Število mesecev proizvodnje zalog v primerjavi z letno proizvodnjo
Percentage of months stocked (base 12 months)
Delež mesecev proizvodnje zalog (osnova = 12 mesecev)
The conclusion that the trend of stocks shows an injurious situation is therefore confirmed.
Zato se sklepna ugotovitev, da gibanje zalog kaže na stanje škode, potrdi.
One interested party, as already mentioned in recital 20, challenged the findings in recitals 96 to 99 of the provisional Regulation regarding the Union industry’s sales prices, claiming that the Commission did not include in its determination of the Union unit price producers in Poland and the Czech Republic and that the findings were not consistent with actual public data.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 20, je ena zainteresirana stran izpodbijala ugotovitve v zvezi s prodajnimi cenami industrije Unije iz uvodnih izjav 96 do 99 začasne uredbe, pri čemer je trdila, da Komisija v svojo določitev cene Unije na enoto ni vključila proizvajalcev s Poljske in Češke ter da ugotovitve niso v skladu z dejanskimi javnimi podatki.
Regarding this claim, a simulation was made including the sales prices registered in Poland, which accounts for approximately 10 % of the total Union production.
Kar zadeva to trditev, je bila izvedena simulacija, ki je vključevala prodajne cene, registrirane na Poljskem, ki predstavlja približno 10 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
No simulation had been done for the Czech Republic, whose production amounts to less than 3 % of the total Union production.
Za Češko, katere proizvodnja znaša manj kot 3 % celotne proizvodnje v Uniji, simulacija ni bila izvedena.
The simulation showed that, even taking into consideration Polish prices, the final findings do not change in any meaningful way.
Simulacija je pokazala, da se tudi ob upoštevanju poljskih cen dokončne ugotovitve ne spremenijo bistveno.
Finally, consistently with its methodology, the Commission calculated the Union industry sales prices after making the relevant adjustments to obtain the prices to the first independent customer, to ensure comparability with Chinese sales prices.
Nazadnje, Komisija je v skladu s svojo metodologijo izračunala prodajne cene industrije Unije po opravljeni ustrezni prilagoditvi za določitev cen, zaračunanih prvi neodvisni stranki, da bi zagotovila primerljivost s kitajskimi prodajnimi cenami.
One interested party held that the reasoning in recital 97 of the provisional Regulation explaining that the Union industry was forced to sell lower quantities and a larger variety was wrong as the Union industry in such case allegedly should have lost much more than a 2 % market share.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je obrazložitev v uvodni izjavi 97 začasne uredbe, ki pojasnjuje, da je bila industrija Unije prisiljena prodajati manjše količine z večjo raznovrstnostjo, napačna, saj bi morala industrija Unije v tem primeru domnevno izgubiti veliko več kot 2 % tržnega deleža.
It should be observed that the focussing on sales of lower batches does not necessarily entail the loss of a larger share of the market.
Opozoriti je treba, da osredotočanje na prodajo manjših serij ne pomeni nujno izgube večjega tržnega deleža.
Firstly, the Union industry has not been completely ousted from the market for larger, uniform batches of product, notwithstanding the fact that the pressure of low-priced Chinese imports is particularly strong in that sector.
Prvič, industrija Unije ni bila v celoti izrinjena s trga za večje, enotne serije izdelka kljub dejstvu, da je pritisk nizkocenovnega kitajskega uvoza v navedenem sektorju še posebej izrazit.
Secondly, the Union industry was able to maintain its presence on the whole market by means of a compression of its sales prices and the production of a costlier product-mix, which led to falling profitability as mentioned in recital 100 of the provisional Regulation.
Drugič, industrija Unije je uspela ohraniti svojo navzočnost na celotnem trgu s stiskanjem svojih prodajnih cen in proizvodnjo dražjega izbora izdelkov, kar je privedlo do manjše dobičkonosnosti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 100 začasne uredbe.
Therefore, the fact that the Union industry did not lose a larger portion of the market is explained by the choice to keep a presence on the market despite price pressure from China.
Zato je dejstvo, da industrija Unije ni izgubila večjega tržnega deleža, pojasnjeno z odločitvijo o ohranitvi navzočnosti na trgu kljub cenovnemu pritisku Kitajske.
Profitability, cash flow, return on investments and wages
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, donosnost naložb in plače
One party held that there are large differences in profitability between large and small companies.
Ena stran je trdila, da obstajajo velike razlike v dobičkonosnosti med velikimi in malimi družbami.
For this reason it was claimed that the average profit had to be considered as unrepresentative as the sample only contained data from one large company.
Zaradi tega je ta stran trdila, da bi moral povprečni dobiček veljati za nereprezentativnega, saj vzorec vsebuje le podatke ene velike družbe.
Another party claimed that the large Union producers are in good financial condition.
Druga stran je trdila, da so veliki proizvajalci Unije v dobrem finančnem stanju.
The same party argued that since there were no losses even when adding the small companies in the average profit margin of the Union industry as shown in recital 101 and Table 12 of the provisional Regulation, no overall injury could be demonstrated.
Ista stran je trdila, da se povprečna stopnja dobička industrije Unije, kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi 101 in preglednici 12 začasne uredbe, tudi z vključitvijo malih družb ni zmanjšala in da zato ni mogoče dokazati nobene splošne škode.
It should be noted that in order to ensure the consistency of the findings with the representativeness of the sampling, all the injury indicators (including profit) have been weighted against the share of each segment in the total Union production.
Opozoriti je treba, da so bili za zagotovitev usklajenosti ugotovitev z reprezentativnostjo vzorca vsi kazalniki škode (vključno z dobičkom) pretehtani glede na delež vsakega segmenta v celotni proizvodnji Unije.
On the other hand, the representativeness of the large company of the situation of the larger segment is confirmed.
Po drugi strani je reprezentativnost velike družbe, kar zadeva položaj večjega segmenta, potrjena.
Therefore, the overall indicators as obtained from the analysis of the sampled companies are representative of the situation of the whole Union industry and the abovementioned claim had to be rejected.
Splošni kazalniki, kot so bili pridobljeni z analizo vzorčenih družb, so torej reprezentativni za položaj celotne industrije Unije, zato je bilo treba navedeno trditev zavrniti.
In relation to the claim that the large companies suffered no injury, it should be noted that in accordance with Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation the analysis should be made in relation to the Union industry as a whole and not to certain groups or types of companies.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da velike družbe niso imele škode, je treba opozoriti, da je treba v skladu s členom 4(1) osnovne uredbe analizo izvesti v povezavi z industrijo Unije kot celoto in ne v povezavi z nekaterimi skupinami ali vrstami družb.
As mentioned already in recital 130, the fact that no losses are made in the IP does not per se mean that no injury occurred.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 130, dejstvo, da v OP ni bilo izgub, samo po sebi ne pomeni, da ni prišlo do nobene škode.
One interested party challenged the conclusion that the cost of production of the Union industry had risen by 14 % as a consequence of the increase in stocks and change in product mix.
Ena zainteresirana stran je izpodbijala sklepno ugotovitev, da so se stroški proizvodnje industrije Unije povečali za 14 % zaradi povečanja zalog in spremembe izbora izdelkov.
According to this party, this conclusion would not hold true as stock levels as well as product mix are not part of the cost of production.
Po navedbah te strani ta sklepna ugotovitev ni pravilna, ker obseg zalog in izbor izdelkov nista del stroškov proizvodnje.
This claim has to be rejected since high stock levels represent a considerable financial cost, which is included in the analysis of the cost of production.
To trditev je treba zavrniti, ker velik obseg zalog predstavlja znatne finančne stroške, ki so vključeni v analizo stroškov proizvodnje.
On the other hand, the repeated change in product mix entails additional production costs as the producer has to frequently revise the production process: this operation can be costly since it causes idle times and sub-optimal utilisation of the machineries.
Po drugi strani večkratna sprememba izbora izdelkov pomeni dodatne proizvodne stroške, saj mora proizvajalec pogosto spreminjati proizvodni postopek: ta dejavnost je lahko draga, saj povzroča obdobja mirovanja in nezadostno izkoriščenost strojev.
One interested party questioned the conclusion in recital 107 of the provisional Regulation that the decrease in consumption had a negative effect on the Union industry.
Ena zainteresirana stran je podvomila v sklepno ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 107 začasne uredbe, da je zmanjšanje potrošnje negativno vplivalo na industrijo Unije.
According to this party, there could be no injury as a consequence of the decrease in consumption as the overall market share remained the same.
Po navedbah te strani zmanjšanje potrošnje ni moglo povzročiti škode, saj je splošni tržni delež ostal nespremenjen.
As for the comment on the stability of the Union producers’ market share despite falling consumption, it should be noted that market share is not the only relevant indicator of injury.
Kar zadeva pripombo o stabilnosti tržnega deleža proizvajalcev Unije kljub zmanjšanju potrošnje, je treba opozoriti, da tržni delež ni edini pomemben kazalnik škode.
The Union producers managed to keep their share in the Union market only to the detriment of profitability, which fell during the period under consideration.
Proizvajalci Unije so uspeli ohraniti svoj delež na trgu Unije le na račun dobičkonosnosti, ki se je med obravnavanim obdobjem zmanjšala.
It cannot therefore be concluded that the stability of the Union producers’ market share excludes the presence of injury.
Zato ni mogoče skleniti, da stabilnost tržnega deleža proizvajalcev Unije izključuje navzočnost škode.
Considering the above, the conclusions on injury as set out in recitals 107 to 111 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se sklepne ugotovitve o škodi, kot so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 107 do 111 začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
The Commission received comments on the provisional findings concerning causation.
Komisija je prejela pripombe glede začasnih ugotovitev v zvezi z vzročno zvezo.
Those comments were a repetition of comments already addressed in the provisional Regulation in recitals 128 to 132 concerning self-inflicted injury.
Navedene pripombe so bile ponovljene pripombe, ki so bile že obravnavane v uvodnih izjavah 128 do 132 začasne uredbe v zvezi s samopovzročeno škodo.
No further evidence was submitted that would change the provisional conclusions.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni nadaljnji dokazi, ki bi spremenili začasne sklepne ugotovitve.
Therefore, the conclusions as set out in recitals 135 and 136 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se sklepne ugotovitve, kot so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 135 in 136 začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
In accordance with Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, at provisional stage it was examined whether the dumped imports of the product concerned originating in China had caused material injury to the Union industry.
V skladu s členom 3(6) in (7) osnovne uredbe se je na začasni stopnji preučilo, ali je dampinški uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Kitajske povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
Some parties claimed that the decline in the Union industry’s production and sales was a result of decreasing consumption.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je bil upad proizvodnje in prodaje industrije Unije posledica zmanjšane potrošnje.
It was also held that the effects of Chinese imports must have been limited given that the Chinese market share only increased by 1,6 % out of which no more than 1 % could have related to the Union industry’s market share.
Trdile so tudi, da so bili učinki kitajskega uvoza zagotovo omejeni, saj se je kitajski tržni delež povečal le za 1,6 %, od tega pa je bil lahko s tržnim deležem industrije Unije povezan največ 1 %.
In this context it is recalled that the investigation revealed a coincidence in time between the increased market share of the Chinese imports and the decrease of the Union industry’s profits and an increase of stock levels.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno časovno sovpadanje med povečanim tržnim deležem kitajskega uvoza ter zmanjšanjem dobičkov in povečanjem obsega zalog industrije Unije.
Furthermore, it is not only an increased market share that has put pressure on the Union industry but even more so the pricing behaviour and the high undercutting levels of the Chinese exporting producers.
Poleg tega industrija Unije ni bila pod pritiskom le zaradi povečanega tržnega deleža, temveč bolj zaradi cenovnega obnašanja in visokih stopenj nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
As recalled in recital 113, the investigation revealed significant levels of price undercutting.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 113, so bile v preiskavi ugotovljene znatne stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
It also showed that the Union industry and importers to a large extent were selling to the same customers which meant that the Union industry was in direct competition with the dumped imports for orders.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so industrija Unije in uvozniki v veliki meri prodajali istim strankam, kar je pomenilo, da sta bila industrija Unije in dampinški uvoz v neposredni konkurenci za naročila.
Overall this shows that it was the price pressure and not only the volumes of imports that caused the fall of the Union industry profitability figures and the deterioration of most injury indicators.
Na splošno to pomeni, da sta bila zmanjšanje dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije in poslabšanje večine kazalnikov škode posledica cenovnega pritiska in ne le obsega uvoza.
Lack of competition between tiles produced in the Union and the dumped tiles imported from China
Pomanjkanje konkurence med ploščicami, proizvedenimi v Uniji, in dampinškimi ploščicami, uvoženimi iz Kitajske
Several interested parties claimed that imports of ceramic tiles from China could not have caused injury to the Union industry as they are not comparable.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da uvoz keramičnih ploščic iz Kitajske ni mogel povzročiti škode industriji Unije, ker ni primerljiv.
In this context it was held that ceramic tiles from China cater the market for homogeneous products while the Union industry produces to order, in smaller batches.
V zvezi s tem so trdile, da keramične ploščice iz Kitajske oskrbujejo trg z enovitimi izdelki, medtem ko je proizvodnja industrije Unije usmerjena v naročila v manjših serijah.
It was also held that the Chinese and the Union industry are not in competition due to the fact that the Chinese operate in the low to mid-end segment while the Union industry operates in the mid to high-end segment.
Trdile so tudi, da kitajska industrija in industrija Unije nista v konkurenci, saj kitajska industrija deluje v nizkem do srednjem segmentu, medtem ko industrija Unije deluje v srednjem do visokem segmentu.
The limited loss of market share by the Union industry was put forward as evidence in this respect.
V zvezi s tem je bila kot dokaz navedena omejena izguba tržnega deleža industrije Unije.
While no substantive evidence has been supplied in support of the above claims, it was nevertheless carefully considered whether Chinese imports were indeed competing with the tiles produced in the Union.
Čeprav niso bili predloženi nobeni utemeljeni dokazi v podporo navedenim trditvam, je bilo pozorno preučeno, ali je kitajski uvoz dejansko konkuriral ploščicam, proizvedenim v Uniji.
In this context it should be noted that the Commission made very detailed comparisons, distinguishing between hundreds of different types of tiles.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je Komisija izvedla zelo podrobne primerjave, ki so omogočile razlikovanje med več sto različnimi vrstami ploščic.
In this case, the investigation showed a significant level of matching types between the Union industry and the exporters.
V tem primeru je bila v preiskavi ugotovljena znatna stopnja ujemajočih se vrst med industrijo Unije in izvozniki.
This clearly shows that the Union industry and the Chinese imports are competing in terms of product types.
To jasno dokazuje, da sta industrija Unije in kitajski uvoz v konkurenci, kar zadeva vrste izdelkov.
It is also recalled that it has been established in the investigation that the Union industry and the exporting producers are in direct competition as they share the same client base.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da so industrija Unije in proizvajalci izvozniki v neposredni konkurenci, ker si delijo iste stranke.
In respect of the claim that ceramic tiles from China cater the market for homogeneous products while the Union industry produces to order, in smaller batches, it is recalled – see recital 95 of the provisional Regulation – that it was exactly the pressure from the Chinese imports that forced the Union industry to move towards smaller batches of products with larger varieties in terms of colours and size.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da keramične ploščice iz Kitajske oskrbujejo trg z enovitimi izdelki, medtem ko industrija Unije proizvaja naročila v manjših serijah, je treba opozoriti (glej uvodno izjavo 95 začasne uredbe), da je ravno pritisk s strani kitajskega uvoza prisilil industrijo Unije v preusmeritev na manjše serije izdelkov z večjo raznovrstnostjo po barvah in velikosti.
The Union industry still has a presence in all segments of the market and unlike what was claimed above, the pattern showing that the Union industry had to focus on specific product types must be seen as an indication that direct competition was at hand.
Industrija Unije je še vedno navzoča v vseh segmentih trga, pri čemer je treba vzorec, ki kaže na to, da se je morala industrija Unije osredotočiti na posebne vrste izdelkov, v nasprotju z navedenimi trditvami obravnavati kot dokaz navzočnosti neposredne konkurence.
In view of the above, the argument that the Chinese imports did not cause injury to the Union industry as they were not competing cannot be upheld.
Glede na navedeno argumenta, da kitajski uvoz ni povzročil škode industriji Unije, ker nista v konkurenci, ni mogoče zagovarjati.