natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’); the two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical.
S 1. decembrom 2009 sta člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES postala člena 107 oziroma 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU). Določbe so v obeh primerih vsebinsko enake.
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
V tem sklepu se sklicevanja na člena 107 in 108 PDEU po potrebi razumejo kot sklicevanja na člena 87 oziroma 88 Pogodbe ES.
OJ C 135, 3.6.2008, p. 7.
UL C 135, 3.6.2008, str. 7.
Case N 531/05, Measures relating to the creation and operation of La Banque Postale (post office bank) (OJ C 21, 28.1.2006, p. 2).
Zadeva N531/05, Ukrepi v zvezi z ustanovitvijo Banque Postale (UL C 21, 28.1.2006, str. 2).
Since the reasons for classifying the aid as existing aid have already been set out in recitals 93 to 97 of the decision to open the formal investigation into the aid (see footnote 2) and the Commission has received no comments on this point, the Commission will not return to this issue but will simply confirm the preliminary assessment contained in the said decision.
Ker je bila opredelitev pomoči kot veljavne že obrazložena v uvodnih izjavah 93 do 97 odločitve o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave pomoči (glej opombo 2) in ker Komisija v zvezi s tem ni prejela nobene pripombe, Komisija ne bo več obravnavala tega vprašanja, ampak se bo omejila na potrditev predhodne ocene iz navedene odločitve.
Official Journal of the French Republic of 17 July 1980, p. 1799.
JORF, 17.7.1980, str. 1799.
The Court of Cassation followed the reasoning in a judgment of the Douai Court of Appeal of 22 October 1998, in which La Poste was likened to a publicly owned establishment of an industrial and commercial character.
Kasacijsko sodišče je uporabilo načelo, ki je bilo določeno s sodbo pritožbenega sodišča v Douaiju z dne 22. oktobra 1998 ter po katerem se podjetje La Poste šteje za enakovredno osebi javnega prava industrijske in komercialne narave.
In a report submitted to the French Senate in 2003, the Economic Affairs Committee stated that it was common knowledge that, since the reform of 1990, the parent company, La Poste, had a legal form similar to that of a publicly owned establishment of an industrial and commercial character.
Odbor za gospodarske zadeve je v poročilu francoskemu senatu iz leta 2003 poudaril: „Vsakdo ve, da se lahko status matičnega podjetja La Poste od reforme leta 1990 šteje za enakovrednega statusu osebe javnega prava industrijske in komercialne narave.“
See the judgment of the Court of Cassation of 21 December 1987 (1st Civil Division).
Glej zlasti sodbo kasacijskega sodišča z dne 21. decembra 1987 (prvi civilni senat).
Official Journal of the French Republic of 26 January 1985, p. 1097.
JORF, 26.1.1985, str. 1097.
Administrative Court of Appeal, Paris 15 February 1991, JCP E1991, pan.
Upravno pritožbeno sodišče, Pariz, 15. februar 1991, JCP E 1991, pan.
Court of Cassation, Soc.
742; kasacijsko sodišče, Soc.
6 November 1991, JCP E1992, pan.
november 1991, JCP E 1992, pan.
85, Bull. V No 476.
85, Bull. V, št. 476.
The deadlines in question are those mentioned in the third subparagraph of Article 3-1 of the Decree.
Gre za roka, navedena v tretjem odstavku člena 3-1 navedenega odloka.
Article 10 of Decree No 2008-479 provides that ‘If the notice given has had no effect by the time these deadlines expire, the representative of the State or the authority responsible for supervision shall enter the expenditure in the budget of the defaulting authority or publicly owned establishment.
Člen 10 odloka št. 2008-479 določa, da „če ob izteku teh rokov opomin ostaja brez učinka, predstavnik države ali organ, pristojen za nadzor, odhodek vpiše v proračun skupnosti ali osebe javnega prava, ki ni izpolnila obveznosti. Po potrebi zagotovi potrebna sredstva bodisi z zmanjšanjem sredstev, ki so namenjena za druge odhodke in so še na voljo, bodisi s povečanjem sredstev.
The representative of the State or the authority responsible for supervision shall, as appropriate, release the necessary resources either by reducing the appropriations allocated to other expenditures and still available or by increasing resources’.
Če lokalna skupnost ali oseba javnega prava v osmih dneh po uradnem obvestilu o vpisu sredstva ni izvršila plačila dolgovanega zneska, predstavnik države ali organ, pristojen za nadzor, v enem mesecu to opravi po uradni dolžnosti.“
Bulletin officiel de la comptabilité publique.
Bulletin Officiel de la Comptabilité publique (Uradno glasilo javnega računovodstva).
See Chapter 3 of codifying instruction No 02-060-M95 of 18 July 2002 on the financial and accounting regulation of national publicly owned establishments of an industrial and commercial character, Bulletin officiel de la comptabilité publique.
Glej poglavje 3 zakonodajnega navodila št. 02-060-M95 z dne 18. julija 2002 o finančni in računovodski ureditvi nacionalnih oseb javnega prava industrijske in komercialne narave, Bulletin Officiel de la Comptabilité publique (Uradno glasilo javnega računovodstva).
See Part IV, B: ‘Quelles dispositions juridiques prévoir?’, p. 21.
Glej del IV, B: „Katere pravne določbe določiti?“, str. 21.
Established in 1965, ERAP is an EPIC whose purpose is to acquire, at the request of the State, shareholdings in undertakings in the energy, pharmaceutical and telecommunications sectors.
Podjetje ERAP, ki je bilo ustanovljeno leta 1965, je EPIC, katere poslovna dejavnost je na zahtevo države kupiti deleže v podjetjih v energetskem, farmacevtskem in telekomunikacijskem sektorju.
See Article ‘Fitch attribue la note préliminaire AAA au programme EMTN garanti de EUR 10 MD de ERAP’.
Glej članek „Fitch attribue la note préliminaire AAA au programme EMTN garanti de EUR 10 MD de ERAP (Agencija Fitch dodelila programu EMTN podjetja ERAP s poroštvom 10 milijard EUR predhodno oceno AAA)“.
Consultable on ERAP’s website: www.erap.fr/pdf/CP_Fitch_Ratings_fr.pdf
Na voljo na spletni strani podjetja ERAP: www.erap.fr/pdf/CP_Fitch_Ratings_fr.pdf
See Article ‘Moody’s attribue la notation Aaa au programme d’EMTN de l’ERAP portant sur 10 milliards d’euros’.
Glej članek „Moody’s attribue la notation Aaa au programme d’EMTN de l’ERAP portant sur 10 milliards d’euros (Agencija Moody’s programu EMTN podjetja ERAP v višini 10 milijard EUR dodelila oceno Aaa)“.
In accordance with article 15 of Law No 90-568 of 2 July 1990 the accounts of La Poste comply with the rules applicable to commercial enterprises.
V skladu s členom 15 zakona št. 90-568 z dne 2. julija 1990 računovodstvo podjetja La Poste poteka v skladu s pravili, ki se uporabljajo za trgovska podjetja.
See, in particular, the letters from the French authorities dated 24 April 2006, 6 December 2006, 16 January 2007, 1 February 2007 and 19 March 2007.
Glej zlasti dopise francoskih organov z dne 24. aprila 2006, 6. decembra 2006, 16. januarja 2007, 1. februarja 2007 in 19. marca 2007.
See Part III of the letter from the French authorities dated 23 January 2008.
Glej del III dopisa francoskih organov z dne 23. januarja 2008.
Council of State, 1 April 1938, Société de l’hôtel d’Albe, reported in Receuil, p. 341.
Conseil d’Etat, 1. april 1938, Société de l’hôtel d’Albe, zbirka Conseil d’Etat, str. 341.
See recital 33 of the opening decision.
Glej uvodno izjavo 33 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka.
Council of State, 10 November 1999, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, reported in Receuil, p. 348; Council of State, 18 November 2005, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, reported in Receuil, p. 515.
Conseil d’Etat, 10. november 1999, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, zbirka Conseil d’Etat, str. 348; Conseil d’Etat, 18. november 2005, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, zbirka Conseil d’Etat, str. 515.
See recital 34 of the opening decision.
Glej uvodno izjavo 34 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka.
Official Journal of the French Republic, No 177, 2 August 2001, p. 12480.
JORF št. 177, 2.8.2001, str. 12480.
See Part IIIB of the memorandum from the French authorities dated 23 January 2008 and the observations sent by the French authorities on 27 October 2009.
Glej del IIIB obvestila, ki so ga francoski organi poslali 23. januarja 2008, in pripombe, ki so jih francoski organi poslali 27. oktobra 2009.
See the memo from the French authorities sent on 27 October 2009.
Glej obvestilo francoskih organov z dne 27. oktobra 2009.
Labetoulle, ‘La responsabilité des AAI dotées de la personnalité juridique: coup d’arrêt à l’idée de “garantie de l’Etat” ’ in RJEP/CJEG No 635, October 2006.
La responsabilité des AAI dotées de la personnalité juridique: coup d’arrêt à l’idée de „garantie de l’Etat“ (Odgovornost neodvisnih upravnih organov, ki so pravne osebe: ustavitev zamisli „državnega poroštva“); D. Labetoulle; RJEP/CJEG, št. 635, oktober 2006.
See Part IV of the letter from the French authorities dated 23 January 2008.
Glej del IV dopisa francoskih organov z dne 23. januarja 2008.
See paragraph 78 of the letter from the French authorities dated 23 January 2008.
Glej odstavek 78 dopisa francoskih organov z dne 23. januarja 2008.
Bon, ‘Le Préfet face à l’inexécution par une collectivité territoriale d’un jugement la condamnant pécuniairement’, in RFDA — March April 2006, p. 341.
Le Préfet face à l’inexécution par une collectivité territoriale d’un jugement la condamnant pécuniairement (Prefekt in neizvršitev sodne odločbe, s katero je ozemeljski skupnosti naložena denarna kazen); P. Bon, RFDA – marec–april 2006, str. 341.
Landais and F. Lenica, ‘Le pouvoir de substitution du préfet en cas d’inexécution de la chose jugée par les collectivités territoriales’, in AJDA, 23 January 2006, p. 137.
Landais in F. Lenica, Le pouvoir de substitution du préfet en cas d’inexécution de la chose jugée par les collectivités territoriales (Pooblastilo za nadomestitev prefekta, kadar ozemeljske skupnosti ne izvršijo pravnomočne odločitve); AJDA, 23. januar 2006, str. 137.
Council of State, 10 November 1999, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, cited above.
Conseil d’Etat, 10. november 1999, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, navedeno zgoraj.
Council of State, 18 November 2005, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, cited above.
Conseil d’Etat, 18. november 2005, Société de gestion du port de Campoloro, navedeno zgoraj.
Council of State, 30 November 1923, reported in Receuil, p. 789.
Conseil d’Etat, 30. november 1923, zbirka, str. 789.
parts of this text have been omitted to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed.
Deli tega besedila so bili izpuščeni, da ne bi bila objavljena nobena zaupna informacija.
Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 14).
Obvestilo Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki poroštev (UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 14).
According to the French authorities, compliance with these criteria is sufficient, albeit not necessary, to rule out the existence of any advantage In particular, it would be counter-intuitive to regard the alleged existence of a doubt about the procedure applicable in the event of insolvency to be reflected in more favourable funding terms.
Po mnenju francoskih organov upoštevanje teh meril zadostuje za izločitev obstoja kakršne koli prednosti, vendar ni potrebno. Zlasti naj ne bi bilo intutitivno, če bi menili, da lahko domnevni obstoj pomislekov o postopku, ki se uporablja v primeru plačilne nesposobnosti, privede do boljših pogojev financiranja.
Article L 643-11 of the Commercial Code.
Člen L 643-11 trgovinskega zakonika.
‘Category 1: equalization of ratings with those of the state owner.
„- Category 1: equalization of ratings with those of the state owner.
‘Category 2: notching down with respect to the state owner’s rating.
„- Category 2: notching down with respect to the state owner’s rating.
‘Category 3: notching up from the postal entity’s stand-alone rating.
„- Category 3: notching up from the postal entity’s stand-alone rating.
[…] The entity’s postal activities are still a key public service, but the clear aim of the entity is to achieve a high level of operational and financial independence, either through privatization or commercial autonomy (state ownership, but independent management) […]’.
[…] The entity’s postal activities are still a key public service, but the clear aim of the entity is to achieve a high level of operational and financial independence, either through privatization or commercial autonomy (state ownership, but independent management) […]“
‘Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its counterparty credit […] ratings on French issuer AGF […] to “A” from “A+” […], following a review of AGF’s parent, the Munich-based Allianz group (AA–/Negative/A–1+).
„Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its counterparty credit […] ratings on French issuer AGF […] to ‚A‘ from ‚A+‘ […], following a review of AGF’s parent, the Munich-based Allianz group (AA-/Negative/A-1+).
‘The ratings also take into account the unchallenged status of both it and its parent, Germany-based Volkswagen Financial Services AG (VWFS), as core and captive finance entities to VW’ and ‘the ratings on VW Bank could moderately diverge (generally not more than one notch) from the ratings on VW or VWFS; currently only its outlook differs.’
„The ratings also take into account the unchallenged status of both it and its parent, Germany-based Volkswagen Financial Services AG (VWFS), as core and captive finance entities to VW“ in „the ratings on VW Bank could moderately diverge (generally not more than one notch) from the ratings on VW or VWFS; currently only its outlook differs.“
‘The ratings on Germany-based Volkswagen Financial Services AG (VWFS) are based on its unchallenged status as a core subsidiary of German automaker Volkswagen AG (VW; A–/Negative/A–2) and reflect its strategic importance for and close operational integration into its parent.’
„The ratings on Germany-based Volkswagen Financial Services AG (VWFS) are based on its unchallenged status as a core subsidiary of German automaker Volkswagen AG (VW; A-/Negative/A-2) and reflect its strategic importance for and close operational integration into its parent.“
‘The rating of a company that enjoys strong state support […] may be lowered by two categories because the financial relationship between the company and the State may change in the medium or long term.’
„Bonitetna ocena podjetja, ki je upravičeno do močne državne podpore […], se lahko zniža za dve kategoriji, če se lahko finančne vezi med navedenim podjetjem in državo srednjeročno ali dolgoročno spremenijo.“
Similarly, according to the French authorities, the ‘strong state support’ referred to by the Commission in recital 84 of the opening decision bears no relation to the legal form of the company or any guarantee mechanism, but refers to decisions such as the setting up of the Banque Postale and the reform of pensions financing, which are intended to provide La Poste with the resources to grow on a level playing field with its competitors and at arm’s length from the State.
Prav tako po mnenju francoskih organov „močna podpora države“, ki jo Komisija navaja v uvodni izjavi 84 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka, ni povezana s statusom podjetja ali kakršnim koli mehanizmom poroštva, ampak se navezuje na odločitve, kot je ustanovitev La Banque Postale ali reforma financiranja pokojnin, s katerimi naj bi se podjetju La Poste zagotovila sredstva za razvoj pod enakimi pogoji kot njegovim konkurentom in „at arm’s length“ z državo.
However, some of these measures themselves constitute a considerable amount of State aid (see in particular the Commission Decision dated 10 December 2007 concerning the reform of the financing of the pensions of public sector workers employed by La Poste).
Vendar nekateri od teh ukrepov sami pomenijo državne pomoči v precejšnjem znesku (glej zlasti Odločbo Komisije z dne 10. decembra 2007 o reformi financiranja pokojnin državnih uslužbencev, zaposlenih pri La Poste).
Consequently, they cannot be indicators of the State’s arm’s-length interest in La Poste’s growth.
Zato ti ne morejo biti znaki interesa države za razvoj podjetja La Poste pod pogoji „at arm’s length“.
According to the French authorities, the mid-swap spread was 12 basis points for the fifteen-year bonds (i.e. 33 basis points on fungible treasury bonds) and 4 basis points for the seven-year bonds.
Po navedbah francoskih organov je bil spread na „mid swap“ 12 bazičnih točk pri izdaji za 15 let (ali 33 bazičnih točk na državno obveznico) in 4 bazične točke pri izdaji za 7 let.
By way of comparison, the French authorities indicate that the previous bond issue, made in 2004, concerned a fifteen-year bond for EUR 580 million and had led to a mid-swap spread of 8 basis points.
Za primerjavo francoski organi navajajo, da se je predhodna izdaja obveznic leta 2004 nanašala na obveznico z ročnostjo 15 let v višini 580 milijard EUR in je privedla do spreada 8 bazičnih točk na „mid swap“.
The mid swap is the median between the rate offered and the rate proposed by the banks at any moment for their interbank dealings by maturity, i.e. it is the fixed rate that a bank is willing to exchange for a 6-month Euribor as a general rule.
Mid swap je srednja vrednost med ponujeno obrestno mero in obrestno mero, ki jo banke v nekem trenutku predlagajo za svoje medbančne zamenjave po dospelosti, to je fiksna obrestna mera, ki jo je banka na splošno pripravljena zamenjati proti 6-mesečnemu euriboru.
That rate is the market reference for bond issues in particular.
Ta obrestna mera pomeni tržno referenco zlasti za izdaje obveznic.
Council of State, 16 November 1998, Sille: ‘First, having regard to the fact, as the judges in the court of first instance decided, whether the public authorities can be held liable, even without fault, on the grounds of the principle of the equality of citizens before public burdens, where a measure lawfully adopted has the effect of causing a special loss of a certain degree of gravity to a natural or legal person, that does not hold true in this case because Mr Sille, in his capacity as a real-estate professional, could not be unaware of the risks necessarily involved in the execution of a building project such as that planned in this case, in respect of which it was necessary, in particular, to amend the provisions of the land-use plan and obtain the agreement of the local council that Mr Sille should have contemplated the possibility or, faced with the negative findings of the public enquiry and the hostility encountered by the project, that it would be dropped by the local authority; that having taken on the risk in full knowledge of the facts, he cannot usefully maintain that he has suffered an abnormal loss and that the local authority must bear the substantial consequences for him arising from the shelving of the project’.
Sodišče Conseil d’Etat, 16. november 1998, Sille: „Ob upoštevanju, prvič, da se sicer, kot so odločila prva sodišča, lahko odgovornost, tudi nekrivdna, javnega organa uveljavlja na podlagi načela enakosti državljanov pred javnimi bremeni, kadar zakonito sprejet ukrep fizični ali pravni osebi povzroči posebno in dokaj resno škodo, to ne drži v tem primeru, ker g. Sille kot nepremičninski strokovnjak ni mogel spregledati tveganj, ki so nujno povezana z izvedbo nepremičninskega programa, kot je bil ta, ki je bil načrtovan v tem primeru ter za izvedbo katerega je bilo med drugim treba spremeniti določbe načrta rabe tal in pridobiti soglasje občinskega sveta, in ker bi moral g. Sille predvideti možnost, da bo občina projekt opustila glede na negativne rezultate javne raziskave in nasprotovanja, ki ga je bil projekt deležen; ker je to tveganje prevzel, čeprav je bil popolnoma seznanjen z dejstvi, ne more upravičeno trditi, da je utrpel neobičajno škodo in da mora občina nositi denarne posledice, ki zanj izhajajo iz odpovedi projekta.“
Council of State, 10 July 1996, Meunier: ‘By taking the view that, as a result of choosing to locate the business in such a place and of a letter from the mayor concerning the possibility of land slip, the interested party had accepted in full knowledge of the facts the risks of instability to which his establishment was exposed, the Administrative Appeal Court made a final decision on the facts.
Sodišče Conseil d’Etat, 10. julij 1996, Meunier: „Upravno pritožbeno sodišče je s tem, ko je menilo, da iz odločitve o umestitvi trgovine v tak kraj in pisma župana o možnosti premikov zemljišča izhaja, da je zadevna stranka, ki je bila seznanjena z dejstvi, sprejela tveganja nestabilnosti, ki jim je bila njena stavba izpostavljena, opravilo suvereno presojo.
By taking the view that the loss resulting from a situation to which the interested party knowingly exposed himself did not give him grounds for compensation, the Court did not fail to apply the rules governing the liability of legal entities governed by public law’.
Z mnenjem, da škoda, ki je nastala zaradi položaja, ki se mu je zadevna stranka vede izpostavila, tej ne daje pravice do povrnitve škode, ni kršilo pravil, s katerimi se ureja odgovornost javnih oseb.“
For further details see recitals 11 to 13 of the opening decision.
Za več podrobnosti glej uvodne izjave 11 do 13 odločitve o sprožitvi postopka.
See Section 3.1.1.A of this Decision.
Glej oddelek 3.1.1.A tega sklepa.
See footnote 29.
Glej opombo 29.
See footnote 30.
Glej opombo 30.
Constitutional Council, decision No 2001-448, 25 July 2001: ‘On the basis of Article 34 of the Constitution, Article 61 could properly require any guarantee given by the State to be authorised by the Finance Act within three years, in order to ensure clarity in the State’s financial commitments; but it does not follow that if no such authorisation is granted the guarantee concerned must lapse. Such a consequence would be contrary to the principle of equality before public burdens (égalité devant les charges publiques) and, if the injury caused is especially serious, to the right of property. In any event, the legislative history makes it clear that the purpose of Article 61 is to ensure that Parliament is informed of guarantees given by the State, and not to bring an end to any guarantees given in the past which have not been authorised within the time laid down. That being so, Article 61 is not contrary to the Constitution’.
Ustavni svet, Sklep št. 2001-448 z dne 25. julija 2001: „Na podlagi člena 34 ustave bi bilo s členom 61 mogoče določiti obveznost, da se zaradi zagotovitve jasnih finančnih obveznosti države vsako poroštvo, ki ga dodeli država, v treh letih dovoli v zakonu o financah, toda iz tega ne izhaja, da so zadevna poroštva neveljavna, če takega dovoljenja ni; taka posledica bi namreč lahko škodovala enakosti pred javnimi bremeni, v primeru dokaj resne kršitve pa tudi lastninski pravici; poleg tega iz parlamentarnih del izhaja, da je namen člena 61 zagotoviti obveščanje parlamenta o poroštvih, ki jih dodeli država, in ne povzročiti neveljavnost poroštev, ki so bila dodeljena v preteklosti in niso bila dovoljena v določenih rokih; v teh okoliščinah člen 61 ni v nasprotju z ustavo.“
Paragraph quoted in the preceding footnote.
Odstavek naveden v prejšnji opombi.
Court of First Instance in Case T-442/03 SIC v Commission [2008] ECR II-1161, paragraphs 124 to 127.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 26. junija 2008 v zadevi SIC proti Komisiji (T-442/93, ZOdl., str. II-1161, točke od 124 do 127).
See also the Guarantees Notice.
Glej tudi obvestilo o poroštvih.
See paragraphs 62 to 68 of the French authorities’ letter of 23 January 2008.
Glej odstavke 62 do 68 obvestila francoskih organov z dne 23. januarja 2008.
Section 4.1.1.A(b)3 of this Decision.
Oddelek 4.1.1.A(b)(3) tega sklepa.
Opening decision, footnote 39.
Glej opombo 39 v odločitvi v sprožitvi postopka.
The memorandum is not public, but it was referred to in the annual report for 1995.
Obvestilo ni javno, vendar je bilo omenjeno v poročilu za leto 1995.