natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is considered that the profit that could be achieved in the absence of dumped imports should be based on the year 2003 which is the only year where profits were achieved by the Union industry and when Chinese imports were less present on the Union market.
Šteje se, da mora dobiček, ki se lahko doseže brez dampinškega uvoza, temeljiti na letu 2003, ki je edino leto, ko je industrija Unije dosegala dobičke in je bil kitajski uvoz manj prisoten na trgu Unije.
It is thus considered that a profit margin of 5 % of turnover could be regarded as an appropriate minimum which the Union industry could have expected to obtain in the absence of injurious dumping.
Zato se šteje, da se lahko stopnja dobička, ki znaša 5 % prihodka od prodaje, obravnava kot ustrezna minimalna stopnja, ki jo lahko industrija Unije po pričakovanju doseže brez dampinškega uvoza.
On this basis, a non-injurious price was calculated for the Union industry for the like product.
Na podlagi tega se je izračunala neškodljiva cena za industrijo Unije za podobni izdelek.
The non-injurious price was obtained by adding the abovementioned profit margin of 5 % to the cost of production.
Neškodljiva cena je bila dobljena s prištetjem navedene 5-odstotne stopnje dobička stroškom proizvodnje.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price of the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC, duly adjusted for importation costs and customs duties with the non-injurious price of the Union industry on the Union market during the IP.
Potrebno povišanje cen je bilo nato določeno s primerjavo med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, ustrezno prilagojeno za stroške uvoza in carine s neškodljivo ceno industrije Unije na trgu Unije v OP.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average cif import value of the compared types.
Razlika, ki izhaja iz te primerjave, je bila nato izražena kot odstotek povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF za primerjane vrste.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, provisional anti-dumping measures should be imposed in respect of imports originating in the PRC at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da je treba v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe začasne protidampinške ukrepe uvesti za uvoz s poreklom iz LRK na ravni nižjih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Zato odražajo položaj teh družb med navedeno preiskavo.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [3] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinške dajatve za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [3] skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, ki je na primer povezana s spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of melamine, currently falling within CN code 29336100 and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Na uvoz melamina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki je uvrščen v oznako KN 29336100, se uvede začasna protidampinška dajatev.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within one month of the date of its entry into force.
V skladu s členom 21(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 lahko zadevne strani predložijo pripombe v zvezi z uporabo te uredbe v enem mesecu od začetka njene veljavnosti.
OJ C 40, 17.2.2010, p. 10.
UL C 40, 17.2.2010, str. 10.
Secondly the Chinese government has exempted the domestic sale of urea from VAT since 1 July 2005.
Drugič, kitajska vlada je domačo prodajo sečnine oprostila DDV od 1. julija 2005.
Thirdly the Chinese government is directly involved in the market through the State Fertilizer System, operating since 2004, whereby the State purchases urea directly from producers to keep in a strategic reserve and can also release quantities of urea in the domestic market.
Tretjič, kitajska vlada je neposredno vključena v trg z državnim sistemom za gnojila, ki deluje od leta 2004, pri katerem država neposredno odkupuje sečnino od proizvajalcev za strateške zaloge in lahko tudi sprošča sečnino na domači trg.
Several written submissions were provided and a hearing with some exporting producers took place.
Predloženo je bilo več pisnih stališč in nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so bili zaslišani.
The exporting producers argued that in the PRC some 70 % of urea is mainly produced by using coal as the major input and only some 30 % of urea is produced from natural gas.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so utemeljevali, da se v LRK približno 70 % sečnine večinoma proizvaja iz premoga kot glavnega vložka, iz zemeljskega plina pa se proizvaja le približno 30 % sečnine.
Chinese imports increased their presence in the Union market between 2006 and 2008.
Kitajski uvoz se je na trgu Unije povečal med letoma 2006 in 2008.
While the total consumption in the EU market has decreased by 12 % over the same period, Chinese exporters have increased the volume of their sales to the Union market by 30 %.
Medtem ko se je skupna potrošnja na trgu EU zmanjšala za 12 % v istem obdobju, so kitajski izvozniki povečali obseg prodaje na trg Unije za 30 %.
The Union industry decreased its production capacity to around 396200 tonnes in 2008.
Industrija Unije je leta 2008 zmanjšala proizvodno zmogljivost za okrog 396200 ton.
However, in view of stagnating sales and decreasing production volumes, the utilisation of the available capacity decreased from 86 % in 2006 to 77 % in the IP.
Vendar se je zaradi stagniranja prodaje in manjšega obsega proizvodnje izkoriščenost razpoložljive zmogljivosti zmanjšala z 86 % leta 2006 na 77 % v OP.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, 1049 Brussels, Belgium.
Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za trgovino, Direktorat H, 1049 Bruselj, Belgija.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1036/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1036/2010
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of zeolite A powder originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz zeolita A v prahu s poreklom iz Bosne in Hercegovine
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
On 17 February 2010, the European Commission (the ‘Commission’) announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of zeolite A powder originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina (‘BiH’).
februarja 2010 je Evropska komisija („Komisija“) z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“), naznanila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom zeolita A v prahu s poreklom iz Bosne in Hercegovine („BiH“) v Unijo.
The proceeding was initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 4 January 2010 by Industrias Quimicas del Ebro SA, MAL Magyar Aluminium, PQ Silicas BV, Silkem d.o.o. and Zeolite Mira Srl Unipersonale (the ‘complainants’), representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 % of the total Union production of zeolite A powder.
Postopek se je začel zaradi pritožbe, ki so jo 4. januarja 2010 vložile družbe Industrias Quimicas del Ebro SA, MAL Magyar Aluminium, PQ Silicas BV, Silkem d.o.o. in Zeolite Mira Srl Unipersonale („pritožniki“), ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje zeolita A v prahu v Uniji.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu tega izdelka in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo, da se upraviči začetek preiskave.
The Commission officially advised the complainants, other known Union producers, the exporting producer group in BiH, importers, users, and other parties known to be concerned, and representatives of BiH of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila pritožnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, skupino proizvajalcev izvoznikov v BiH, uvoznike, porabnike in druge strani, ki jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike BiH.
The complainants, Union producers, the exporting producer group in BiH, importers and users made their views known.
Pritožniki, proizvajalci Unije, skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov v BiH, uvozniki in porabniki so izrazili svoja stališča.
In view of the apparent high number of Union producers and importers, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev in uvoznikov Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and if so, to select a sample, all known Union producers and importers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the Notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned (as defined in section 2.1. below) during the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, poziva vse znane proizvajalce in uvoznike Unije, da se ji javijo in ji predložijo, kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku, osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom (kot je določeno v spodnjem oddelku 2.1) v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009.
As explained in recital (16) below, eight Union producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (16), je osem proizvajalcev Unije predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from the cooperating Union producers, the Commission selected a sample of four Union producers having the largest volume of production/sales in the Union.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejela od sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije, izbrala vzorec štirih proizvajalcev Unije, ki imajo največji delež proizvodnje/prodaje v Uniji.
As explained in recital (20) below, only three unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (20), so le trije nepovezani uvozniki predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
However one of these importers did not import/purchase the product concerned.
Vendar pa eden od uvoznikov ni uvažal/kupoval zadevnega izdelka.
Therefore, in view of the limited number of importers, sampling was deemed to be no longer necessary.
Zato je bilo odločeno, da vzorčenje zaradi omejenega števila uvoznikov ni več potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all the other companies that made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the Notice of initiation, namely to the exporting producer group in BiH, the four sampled Union producers and three unrelated importers/users.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala vsem stranem, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim družbam, ki so se javile v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, in sicer skupini proizvajalcev izvoznikov v BiH, štirim vzorčenim proizvajalcem v Uniji in trem nepovezanim uvoznikom/porabnikom.
Replies were received from the exporting producer group in BiH, including its related companies, from the four sampled Union producers and three Union unrelated importer/users.
Odgovore so poslali skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov v BiH, vključno s povezanimi družbami, štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci v Uniji in trije nepovezani uvozniki/uporabniki v Uniji.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a provisional determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je pridobila in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za začasno ugotavljanje dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Producers in the Union
proizvajalci v Uniji
Industrias Quimicas del Ebro SA, Zaragoza, Spain
Industrias Quimicas del Ebro SA, Zaragoza, Španija,
MAL Magyar Aluminium, Ajke, Hungary
MAL Magyar Aluminium, Ajke, Madžarska,
PQ Silicas BV, Eijsden, Netherlands
PQ Silicas BV, Eijsden, Nizozemska,
Zeolite Mira Srl Unipersonale, Mira, Italy
Zeolite Mira Srl Unipersonale, Mira, Italija;
Importers/users in the Union
uvozniki/uporabniki v Uniji
Reckitt Benckiser Group, Slough, UK and Mira, Italy
Reckitt Benckiser Group, Slough, VB in Mira, Italija,
Henkel AG, Dusseldorf, Germany
Henkel AG, Düsseldorf, Nemčija,
Chemiewerk Bad Kostritz GmbH, Bad Kostritz, Germany
Chemiewerk Bad Kostritz GmbH, Bad Kostritz, Nemčija;
Exporting producers in BiH
proizvajalca izvoznika v BiH
Alumina d.o.o., Zvornik (related to the above mentioned exporting producer)
Alumina d.o.o., Zvornik (povezan z zgoraj navedenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom);
Kauno Tiekimas AB, Kaunas, Lithuania
Kauno Tiekimas AB, Kaunas, Litva.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 (the ‘investigation period’ or the ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from January 2005 to the end of the IP (‘period considered’).
Preučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od januarja 2005 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is zeolite A powder, also referred to as zeolite NaA powder or zeolite 4A powder (the ‘product concerned’), currently falling within CN code ex28421000.
Zadevni izdelek je zeolit A v prahu, znan tudi kot zeolit NaA v prahu ali zeolit 4A v prahu („zadevni izdelek“), ki je trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN ex28421000.
The product concerned is destined at end-use applications as a builder, used in the production of dry detergents and water softeners.
Zadevni izdelek je namenjen za končno uporabo kot dodatek pri proizvodnji suhih detergentov in mehčalcev vode.
The product concerned, the product sold domestically in BiH as well as the one manufactured and sold in the Union by the Union producers were found to have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses and are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imajo zadevni izdelek, izdelek, ki se prodaja na domačem trgu v BiH, in izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Unije, enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti ter se uporabljajo na enak način, zato se v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za enake izdelke.
The Bosnian exporting producer group submitted that the product concerned exported by both Fabrika Glinice Birac AD and its related company Alumina d.o.o.
Skupina bosanskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je navedla, da ima zadevni izdelek, ki ga izvažata Fabrika Glinice Birac AD in povezana družba Alumina d.o.o.
(‘the Birac group’), has different production costs, production processes and quality than the like product produced by some Union producers.
(„skupina Birac“), drugačne proizvodne stroške, proizvodne postopke in kakovost kot podobni izdelek, ki ga proizvajajo nekateri proizvajalci Unije.
It was also argued that the production process of the Birac group is based on alumina liquor from the alumina production process instead of aluminium trihydrate, while production in the Union is typically based on hydrate crystals which, by heating and adding caustic soda, are brought back to liquid state for the production of the zeolite slurry.
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da proizvodni postopek skupine Birac temelji na raztopini aluminijevega oksida iz proizvodnega postopka aluminijevega oksida in ne na aluminijevem trihidratu, medtem ko proizvodnja v Uniji običajno sloni na hidratnih kristalih, ki se ob segrevanju in dodajanju kavstične sode povrnejo v tekoče stanje za proizvodnjo tekoče zmesi zeolita.
With respect to the above arguments it is noted that the information submitted by the Birac group does not put in dispute the established facts that irrespectively of any alleged differences in production processes, costs or quality, the product concerned has the same basic physical and technical characteristics and serves the same purposes as the like product.
V zvezi s prej navedenimi argumenti je treba navesti, da informacije, ki jih je predložila skupina Birac, ne nasprotujejo ugotovljenim dejstvom, da ima zadevni izdelek ne glede na domnevne razlike v proizvodnih postopkih, stroških ali kakovosti enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti in služi enakemu namenu kot podobni izdelek.
Eight Union producers representing around 50 % of the Union producers’ sales volume on the market replied to the request for sampling data in the Notice of Initiation.
Na zahtevo za podatke za vzorčenje iz obvestila o začetku se je odzvalo osem proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo okoli 50-odstotni delež obsega prodaje proizvajalcev Unije.
Initially the five largest Union producers were selected to be part of the sample.
Sprva je bilo za vzorčenje izbranih pet največjih proizvajalcev Unije.
However, one company decided to terminate its co-operation.
Vendar pa se je ena družba odločila, da ne bo sodelovala.
Therefore the remaining four Union producers form the sample in this investigation.
Zato preostali štirje proizvajalci Unije tvorijo vzorec v tej preiskavi.
These four producers represented around 37 % of the Union producers’ total sales volume on the Union market in the IP and more than 75 % of the sales volume of the eight producers that provided data for the sampling exercise.
Ti štirje proizvajalci so v obdobju preiskave predstavljali okoli 37 % celotnega obsega prodaje proizvajalcev Unije na trgu Unije in več kot 75 % obsega prodaje osmih proizvajalcev, ki so predložili podatke za izvedbo vzorčenja.
The four producers selected in the sample were considered to be representative of the overall producers in the Union.
Štirje proizvajalci, izbrani v vzorec, so bili obravnavani kot reprezentativni za vse proizvajalce v Uniji.
The Bosnian exporting producer group argued that three Union producers (MAL Magyar Aluminium, Silkem d.o.o. and Industrias Quimicas del Ebro SA) should be considered as non-cooperating with the investigation.
Skupina bosanskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdila, da je treba tri proizvajalce Unije (MAL Magyar Aluminium, Silkem d.o.o. in Industrias Quimicas del Ebro SA) šteti za nesodelujoče v preiskavi.
It was argued that these companies submitted non-confidential replies to deficiency letters some days latter than the dateline set.
Skupina je trdila, da so te družbe predložile nezaupne odgovore na pozive k dopolnitvi nekaj dni po preteku roka.
With respect to the above it is noted that the information provided by the aforesaid parties was submitted in a timely fashion and it did not impede in any way the progress of the investigation or the rights of defence of parties.
V zvezi z zgoraj navedenim je treba opomniti, da so navedene strani informacije predložile pravočasno in da te informacije niso na noben način ovirale napredka preiskave ali pravic strani do obrambe.
It was also argued that one Union producer (MAL Magyar Aluminium) failed to mention in its reply on sampling that it was related to another Union producer (Silkem d.o.o.).
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da en proizvajalec Unije (MAL Magyar Aluminium) v svojem odgovoru na vzorčenje ni omenil, da je povezan z drugim proizvajalcem Unije (Silkem d.o.o.).
The latter company was not sampled and was not included in MAL Magyar Aluminium's questionnaire reply.
Družba Silkem d.o.o. ni bila vzorčena in ni bila vključena v izpolnjenem vprašalniku družbe MAL Magyar Aluminium.
It was therefore argued that both these two Union producers should be considered as non-cooperating with the present investigation.
Zato je skupina zahtevala, da je treba oba proizvajalca Unije šteti za nesodelujoča v tekoči preiskavi.
To this it is noted that the relationship between these two parties was known to the Commission services at complaint stage and the relationship was stated in the reply on sampling from one of the two parties.
K temu se pripomni, da so službe Komisije že v fazi pritožbe vedele za povezavo med tema dvema družbama in da je povezavo navedla ena od družb v odgovoru na vzorčenje.
Furthermore the relationship was disclosed in MAL Magyar Aluminium's questionnaire response.
Poleg tega je bila povezava razkrita v izpolnjenem vprašalniku družbe MAL Magyar Aluminium.
Finally it should be made clear that Silkem d.o.o. and MAL Magyar Aluminium have fully co-operated with the investigation.
Na koncu je treba pojasniti, da sta družbi Silkem d.o.o. in MAL Magyar Aluminium v celoti sodelovali v preiskavi.
In respect of Silkem d.o.o. they submitted data at sampling stage but were not sampled and hence were not requested to complete a questionnaire response.
Družba Silkem d.o.o. je predložila podatke v fazi vzorčenja, vendar ni bila vzorčena in ji zato ni bilo treba izpolniti vprašalnika.
In respect of MAL Magyar Aluminium there was no need for them to submit a consolidated response including Silkem d.o.o. as Silkem d.o.o. is a separate legal entity.
V zvezi z družbo MAL Magyar Aluminium ni bilo potrebe, da bi predložila skupen odgovor z družbo Silkem d.o.o., saj je ta družba ločena pravna oseba.
Sampling of unrelated importers
Vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov
Only three unrelated importers replied to the request for information for the sampling exercise in the Notice of Initiation.
Na zahtevo za informacije za izvedbo vzorčenja v obvestilu o začetku so odgovorili le trije nepovezani uvozniki.
It was subsequently discovered that one of these companies did not import or purchase the product concerned.
Posledično se je izkazalo, da ena od teh družb ni uvažala ali kupovala zadevnega izdelka.
Subsequently it was decided that sampling was not necessary for unrelated importers.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje za nepovezane uvoznike ni potrebno.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the domestic sales of the like product to independent customers by each of the two exporting producers of the Birac group were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to or greater than 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej preverila, ali je prodaja podobnega izdelka na notranjem trgu vsakega od obeh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v skupini Birac neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna, kar pomeni, ali je celoten obseg take prodaje enak ali večji od 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza proizvajalca v Unijo.