natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to allow smooth trade flows of Basmati into the European Union, and considering that the DNA-based Union control system is not operational yet and therefore the Member States can apply their own control protocols with at least 5 % uncertainty on the checks being cumulative upon any tolerance level, it is appropriate to establish a 5 % tolerance for the presence in the imported Basmati of long grain rice not corresponding to any of the varieties listed in that Annex XVIII.
Da bi omogočili nemotene trgovinske tokove riža basmati v Evropsko unijo in hkrati upoštevali, da sistem nadzora Unije, ki temelji na preiskavi DNK, še ne deluje, lahko tako države članice uporabijo svoje nadzorne protokole, pri čemer na vsaki ravni odstopanja nastane vsaj 5-odstotna negotovost, je ustrezno, da se za navzočnost uvoženega dolgozrnatega riža basmati, ki ne ustreza nobeni od sort iz Priloge XVIII, dovoli 5-odstotno odstopanje.
In order to extend the positive impact of this measure to all concerned importers, it should be provided that the tolerance is applicable to all Basmati imports for which a final decision on the eligibility of the lot has not yet been made by the responsible authorities of the Member States.
Da bi pozitivni učinki tega ukrepa zajeli vse zadevne uvoznike, je treba zagotoviti, da bo odstopanje veljalo za celoten uvoz riža basmati, za katerega pristojni organi držav članic še niso sprejeli končne odločitve o upravičenosti pošiljk.
Regulation (EC) No 972/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 972/2006 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Market,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so skladni z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov –
In Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 972/2006, the following sentence is added:
V členu 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 972/2006 se doda naslednji stavek:
‘However, the presence up to 5 % of husked rice falling within CN code 10062017 or CN code 10062098 not corresponding to any of the varieties listed in Annex XVIII to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be accepted.Article 2
„Vendar se dovoli do 5-odstotna navzočnost oluščenega riža z oznako KN 10062017 ali oznako KN 10062098, ki ne sodi pod nobeno od sort, ki so določene v Prilogi XVIII k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007.Člen 2
Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 972/2006 as amended by Article 1 of this Regulation shall also apply to Basmati imports carried out before the entry into force of this Regulation for which the competent authorities of the Member State have not yet finally established the eligibility to zero duty provided for in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Člen 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 972/2006, kakor je spremenjen s členom 1 te uredbe, se uporablja tudi za uvoz riža basmati, opravljen pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, za katerega pristojni organi držav članic še niso dokončno sprejeli upravičenosti do ničte stopnje uvozne dajatve iz člena 138 Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007.
Article 2 shall cease to apply at the end of the 12th month following entry into force of this Regulation.
Člen 2 se preneha uporabljati konec dvanajstega meseca po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
Done at Brussels, 30 March 2010.
V Bruslju, 30. marca 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 273/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 273/2010
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the European Union and on informing air transport passengers of the identity of the operating air carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE [1], and in particular Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2111/2005 z dne 14. decembra 2005 o vzpostavitvi seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti, in informiranju potnikov v zračnem prometu o identiteti letalskega prevoznika, ki opravlja let, ter razveljavitvi člena 9 Direktive 2004/36/ES [1] in zlasti člena 4 Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March 2006 established the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the European Union referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 [2].
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 474/2006 z dne 22. marca 2006 je bil vzpostavljen seznam Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Evropski uniji iz poglavja II Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 [2].
The Commission informed all air carriers concerned either directly or, when this was not practicable, through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the European Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Community list.
Komisija je vse zadevne letalske prevoznike obvestila neposredno ali, kadar to ni bilo mogoče, prek organov, odgovornih za njihov regulativni nadzor, pri čemer je navedla bistvena dejstva in razloge, ki so podlaga za odločitev o uvedbi prepovedi opravljanja letov v Evropski uniji ali za spremembo pogojev za prepoved opravljanja letov za letalskega prevoznika, ki je vključen na seznam Skupnosti.
The Air Safety Committee has heard presentations by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Commission about the technical assistance projects carried out in countries affected by Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je poslušal predstavitve Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu (EASA) in Komisije o projektih tehnične pomoči, ki so se izvajali v državah, ki jih zadeva Uredba (ES) št. 2111/2005.
The Air Safety Committee has also been informed about enforcement actions taken by EASA and Member States to ensure the continuing airworthiness and maintenance of aircraft registered in the European Union and operated by air carriers certified by civil aviation authorities of third countries.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je bil obveščen tudi o uveljavitvi ukrepov, ki so jih sprejele EASA in države članice, da bi zagotovile stalno plovnost in vzdrževanje zrakoplovov, ki so registrirani v Evropski uniji in jih upravljajo letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi za civilno letalstvo tretjih držav.
European Union carriers
Države Evropske unije
Following information resulting from SAFA ramp checks carried out on aircraft of certain European Union air carriers, as well as area specific inspections and audits carried out by their national aviation authorities, some Member States have taken certain enforcement measures.
Na podlagi rezultatov preverjanj na ploščadi, opravljenih v okviru programa SAFA na zrakoplovih nekaterih letalskih prevoznikov Evropske unije, ter posebnih inšpekcijskih pregledov za določeno področje in revizij, ki so jih opravili njihovi nacionalni organi za letalstvo, so nekatere države članice sprejele določene izvršilne ukrepe.
They informed the Commission and the Air Safety Committee about these measures: the competent authorities of Spain launched the procedure on 12 March 2010 to suspend the Air Operator Certificate (AOC) of the air carrier Baleares Link Express and suspended the AOC of the air carrier Euro Continental on 12 January 2010; the competent authorities of Germany suspended the AOC of Regional Air Express as of 28 January 2010; the competent authorities of the UK informed that the AOC of the carrier Trans Euro Air Limited was suspended on 08 December 2009; the competent authorities of Slovakia informed in writing that the AOC of the carrier Air Slovakia was suspended on 01 March 2010.
O teh ukrepih so obvestile Komisijo in Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu: pristojni organi Španije so 12. marca 2010 sprožili postopek za začasni preklic spričevala letalskega prevoznika Baleares Link Express, 12. januarja 2010 pa so začasno preklicali spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Euro Continental; pristojni organi Nemčije so 28. januarja 2010 začasno preklicali spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Regional Air Express; pristojni organi Združenega kraljestva so sporočili, da je bilo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Trans Euro Air Limited 8. decembra 2009 začasno preklicano; pristojni organi Slovaške so pisno sporočili, da je bilo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Air Slovakia 1. marca 2010 začasno preklicano.
Finally, the competent authorities of Latvia informed the Air Safety Committee that following serious concerns about the safety of the operations and the continuing airworthiness of aircraft of type IL-76 operated by air carrier Aviation Company Inversija, they decided on 26 February 2010 to remove the aircraft from the AOC held by the air carrier Aviation Company Inversija and that the AOC was suspended on 16 March 2010.
Pristojni organi Latvije so obvestili Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu, da so se 26. februarja 2010 na podlagi resnih pomislekov glede varnosti letalske dejavnosti in stalne plovnosti zrakoplova vrste IL-76, ki ga upravlja letalski prevoznik Aviation Company Inversija, odločili o umiku tega zrakoplova iz spričevala letalskega prevoznika, ki je bil v lasti Aviation Company Inversija, in da je bilo spričevalo 16. marca 2010 začasno preklicano.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) 1543/2006 the Commission has obtained detailed information describing the actions taken by the competent authorities of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (GACA) responsible for the regulatory oversight of Air Koryo and by Air Koryo in addressing the safety deficiencies outlined in Regulation (EC) 474/2006.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1543/2006 je Komisija pridobila podrobne informacije o ukrepih, ki so jih sprejeli Air Koryo in pristojni organi Demokratične ljudske republike Koreje (GACA), ki so odgovorni za regulativni nadzor prevoznika Air Koryo, pri obravnavanju varnostnih pomanjkljivosti iz Uredbe (ES) št. 474/2006.
In December 2008 the Commission communicated with GACA requesting a corrective action plan from Air Koryo demonstrating how they had corrected the serious safety deficiencies detected in the ramps inspections conducted prior to the carrier being placed in Annex A of the list of carriers banned from operating in the European Union.
Komisija je decembra 2008 zaprosila GACA, da ji predloži korekcijski akcijski načrt prevoznika Air Koryo, ki bi pokazal, kako so bile odpravljene resne varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med preverjanji na ploščadi, opravljenimi pred vključitvijo prevoznika na seznam letalskih prevoznikov v Prilogi A, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Evropski uniji.
In addition the Commission requested relevant information demonstrating that the GACA has exercised adequate oversight of Air Koryo in compliance with ICAO provisions.
Poleg tega je Komisija zahtevala zadevne informacije, ki naj bi pokazale, da GACA izvaja ustrezen nadzor nad Air Koryo v skladu z določbami ICAO.
In June 2009 GACA formally responded and provided a set of documents which provided a comprehensive response to the requested information.
GACA se je junija 2009 uradno odzvala in predložila dokumente, ki so vsebovali vse zahtevane informacije.
There followed a series of communications between the Commission and the GACA which enabled clarification of the current aviation safety situation in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea to be achieved.
Komisija in GACA sta si nato izmenjali več dopisov, s katerimi se je pojasnilo, kakšno stanje letalske varnosti mora Demokratična ljudska republika Koreja doseči.
The documents provided by GACA and the discussions between the Commission and GACA have shown that, for the Tupolev Tu 204-300 aircraft, Air Koryo is able to demonstrate that the aircraft can be operated in full compliance with international safety standards, including continuing airworthiness and operations, and that GACA is capable of providing oversight of the air carrier in accordance with international standards.
Dokumenti, ki jih je zagotovila GACA, in razprave med Komisijo in GACA so pokazali, da je Air Koryo za zrakoplov Tupolev Tu 204-300 sposoben dokazati, da se lahko upravlja popolnoma v skladu z mednarodnimi varnostnimi standardi, vključno s stalno plovnostjo in letalsko dejavnostjo, in da je GACA sposobna zagotoviti nadzor nad letalskim prevoznikom v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi.
For all other types of aircraft on the fleet of Air Koryo, GACA confirmed that they did not fully comply with international standards for aircraft equipment, notably EGPWS, and that these types were not authorised by GACA to conduct operations in European airspace.
Za vse druge vrste zrakoplovov flote Air Koryo je GACA potrdila, da niso bili v celoti skladni z mednarodnimi standardi glede opreme zrakoplovov, zlasti sistema EGPWS, in da za te vrste GACA ni odobrila izvajanja letalskih dejavnosti v evropskem zračnem prostoru.
Throughout the period GACA reacted promptly and cooperatively to the Commission's requests for information.
GACA je v celotnem obdobju sodelovala s Komisijo in ji brez zamud zagotavljala zahtevane informacije.
Air Koryo made presentations to the Air Safety Committee on 18 March 2010 confirming the positive developments within the company.
Air Koryo je 18. marca 2010 pripravil predstavitev o pozitivnem razvoju družbe.
Following the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Koryo should be allowed to operate the two aircraft type Tupolev Tu-204 with registration P-632 and P-633 into the European Union without operational restrictions.
Glede na navedeno se v skladu s skupnimi merili ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba prevozniku Air Koryo dovoliti izvajanje letov v Evropsko unijo z dvema zrakoplovoma vrste Tupolev Tu-204 z registrskima oznakama P-632 in P-633 brez omejitev pri opravljanju letov.
However, since the rest of the fleet does not comply with relevant ICAO requirements, they should not be allowed to operate into the European Union until such requirements are fully complied with.
Ker pa ostali zrakoplovi v floti niso v skladu z zadevnimi zahtevami ICAO, se jim ne dovoli izvajanja letov v Evropsko unijo, dokler te zahteve ne bodo v celoti izpolnjene.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Koryo should be included in Annex B. It may only have access to the EU with the two aircraft of type Tupolev Tu-204.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril ocenjuje, da je treba Air Koryo vključiti v Prilogo B. V EU lahko leti le z dvema zrakoplovoma vrste Tupolev Tu-204.
The competent authorities of Swaziland provided evidence by written submissions on 17 December 2009 of the withdrawal of the AOCs and of the operating licenses for the following air carriers: Aero Africa (PTY) Ltd, Jet Africa (PTY) Ltd, Royal Swazi National Airways, Scan Air Charter Ltd and Swazi Express Airways.
Pristojni organi Svazija so 17. decembra 2009 s pisno dokumentacijo zagotovili dokaze o umiku spričeval in operativnih licenc naslednjih letalskih prevoznikov: Aero Africa (PTY) Ltd, Jet Africa (PTY) Ltd, Royal Swazi National Airways, Scan Air Charter Ltd in Swazi Express Airways.
These air carriers have ceased their activities since 8 December 2009.
Ti letalski prevozniki so prenehali z dejavnostjo 8. decembra 2009.
In view of the above, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that the aforementioned air carriers licensed in Swaziland should be removed from Annex A.
Glede na navedeno se na podlagi splošnih meril ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba zgoraj navedene letalske prevoznike, licencirane v Svaziju, odstraniti iz Priloge A.
There is verified evidence of serious deficiencies on the part of the air carrier Bellview Airlines certified in Nigeria, as demonstrated by the results of the investigations carried out by the competent authorities of France and by European Aviation Safety Agency.
Kot so pokazali rezultati preiskav, ki so jih izvedli pristojni organi Francije in Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu, obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih pomanjkljivostih pri letalskem prevozniku Bellview Airlines, certificiranem v Nigeriji.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) reported to the Commission that the Part-145 approval ref. EASA.145.0172 it had issued to this organisation was suspended on 8 May 2009 with immediate effect due to unresolved safety deficiencies which lowers the safety standards and hazards seriously the flight safety and that revocation of this approval is being considered.
(22) Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu (EASA) je Komisiji sporočila, da je bil del 145 odobritve EASA.145.0172, ki ga je izdala tej organizaciji, 8. maja 2009 začasno preklican s takojšnjim učinkom zaradi neodpravljenih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, ki zmanjšujejo varnostne standarde in resno ogrožajo varnost letenja, ter da se obravnava možnost razveljavitve odobritve.
Evidence exists that Bellview Airlines certified in Nigeria has taken over operations from the air carrier Bellview Airlines certified in Sierra Leone, an air carrier which was put on Annex A on 22 March 2006 [4] and which was withdrawn on 14 November 2008 [5] after the competent authorities of Sierra Leone informed the Commission of the revocation of its AOC.
Obstajajo dokazi, da je Bellview Airlines, certificiran v Nigeriji, prevzel dejavnosti od letalskega prevoznika Bellview Airlines, ki je bil certificiran v Sierri Leone ter 22. marca 2006 dodan v Prilogo A [4] in 14. novembra 2008 odstranjen [5], potem ko so pristojni organi Sierre Leone obvestili Komisijo o razveljavitvi spričevala letalskega prevoznika.
The aircraft of type Boeing B737-200 with registration mark 5N-BFN experienced a fatal accident in Lagos on 22 October 2005, leading to the total loss of the aircraft and 117 fatalities.
Zrakoplov vrste Boeing B737-200 z registrsko oznako 5N-BFN je bil 22. oktobra 2005 v Lagosu vpleten v nesrečo, v kateri je bil popolnoma uničen in je življenje izgubilo 117 ljudi.
The competent authorities of Nigeria failed to provide details about the accident and have not issued any accident investigation report yet.
Pristojni organi Nigerije niso zagotovili podrobnih podatkov o nesreči in še niso izdali poročila o preiskavi nesreče.
The Commission, having regard to the above mentioned deficiencies, has entered into consultations with the competent authorities of Nigeria, expressing serious concerns about the safety of the operations and the airworthiness of Bellview Airlines and asking for clarifications regarding the situation as well as the actions undertaken by the authorities as well as the air carrier to remedy the identified deficiencies.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenih pomanjkljivosti začela posvetovanja s pristojnimi organi Nigerije, na katerih je izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti dejavnosti in plovnosti prevoznika Bellview Airlines ter zahtevala pojasnila v zvezi s stanjem in ukrepi, ki so jih pristojni organi in letalski prevoznik sprejeli za odpravo teh pomanjkljivosti.
The competent authorities of Nigeria indicated on 19 February 2010 that the operator holds an AOC but had stopped operations.
Pristojni organi Nigerije so 19. februarja 2010 navedli, da prevoznik ima spričevalo, vendar je prenehal z dejavnostjo.
They however failed to provide the status of the certificates held by the air carrier and the status of its aircraft.
Niso pa zagotovili informacij o statusu spričeval, ki jih ima letalski prevoznik, in statusu njegovih zrakoplovov.
Bellview Airlines requested to be heard by the Air Safety Committee and did so on 18 March 2010 assisted by the competent authorities of Nigeria (NCAA).
Bellview Airlines je zaprosil za zaslišanje pred Odborom za varnost v zračnem prometu in je bil zaslišan 18. marca 2010 s pomočjo pristojnih organov Nigerije.
Bellview Airlines provided an AOC stating validity until 22 April 2010 whilst mentioning that this AOC was suspended following the retirement of all aircraft mentioned on this AOC.
Bellview Airlines je predložil spričevalo letalskega prevoznika z veljavnostjo do 22. aprila 2010 in sporočil, da je bilo to spričevalo začasno preklicano zaradi umika iz uporabe vseh zrakoplovov na tem spričevalu.
The NCAA stated that according to the applicable Nigerian regulation the validity of this AOC had lapsed on 4 December 2009, 60 days after the end of the operations of the last aircraft but failed to provide evidence that the AOC was suspended or revoked as appropriate.
Pristojni organi Nigerije so navedli, da je v skladu z veljavnimi nigerijskimi zakoni to spričevalo poteklo 4. decembra 2009, tj. 60 dni po prenehanju opravljanja letov zadnjega zrakoplova, vendar niso predložili dokazov, da je bilo spričevalo začasno preklicano ali razveljavljeno.
Consequently, the NCAA was requested to provide urgently written confirmation of a) the administrative act of suspension or of revocation of the AOC of Bellview Airlines; b) confirmation that the company is in process of (re)certification by the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority; c) the formal undertaking of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority to notify to the Commission the results of the (re)certification audit before an AOC is issued.
Zato so bili pristojni organi Nigerije zaprošeni, da nujno predložijo a) pisno potrdilo o upravnem dejanju začasnega preklica ali razveljavitve spričevala letalskega prevoznika Bellview Airlines; b) pisno potrdilo, da je družba v postopku ponovne certifikacije s strani nigerijske uprave za civilno letalstvo; c) pisno potrdilo o uradni obvezi nigerijske uprave za civilno letalstvo, da bo Komisiji sporočila rezultate revizije ponovne certifikacije pred izdajo spričevala letalskega prevoznika.
Air carriers from Egypt
Letalski prevozniki iz Egipta
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1144/2009 [6], the competent authorities of Egypt have submitted four monthly reports covering November and December 2009, as well January 2010 and February 2010 to show the status of implementation of the plan as verified by these authorities.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1144/2009 [6] so pristojni organi Egipta predložili štiri mesečna poročila za november in december 2009 ter januar in februar 2010, v katerih so predstavili stanje izvajanja načrta, ki so ga ti organi preverili.
Further to these reports which focused on ramp checks of aircraft of Egypt Air, on 18 November the audit reports for continued airworthiness, flight and ground operations were transmitted.
Poleg teh poročil, ki so bila usmerjena na preverjanja zrakoplova prevoznika Egypt Air na ploščadi, so bila 18. novembra predložena revizijska poročila o stalni plovnosti ter izvajanju letalskih dejavnosti in dejavnostih na letališču.
The competent authorities of Egypt have also undertaken to continue providing information regarding the satisfactory closure of findings previously raised during ramp checks of aircraft of Egypt Air in the course of 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Pristojni organi Egipta so se tudi zavezali, da bodo še naprej zagotavljali informacije o tem, ali so bile zadovoljivo odpravljene pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene v predhodnih preverjanjih zrakoplova Egypt Aira na ploščadi v letih 2008, 2009 in 2010.
To that end, they addressed relevant correspondence to certain Member States where aircraft of Egypt Air had been subject to ramp checks.
V ta namen so na nekatere države članice, kjer je bil zrakoplov Egypt Aira predmet preverjanja na ploščadi, naslovile ustrezno korespondenco.
The process of closure of these finding is ongoing and shall be verified on a regular basis.
Postopek odpravljanja ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti je v teku in se bo redno preverjal.