natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pre-forms can be relatively easily transported as they are small and dense, while empty bottles are unstable and due to their size very expensive to transport.
Ker so predforme majhne in kompaktne, jih je razmeroma enostavno prevažati, medtem ko so prazne plastenke nestabilne, njihov prevoz pa je zaradi velikosti zelo drag.
PET bottles are filled with water and/or other beverages by the bottling companies (bottlers).
Plastenke PET z vodo in/ali drugimi pijačami napolnijo družbe za polnjenje („polnilci“).
The bottlers are often involved in the PET business either via integrated bottle making operations or via tolling agreements with subcontracted converters and/or bottle makers for whom they negotiate the PET price with the producer (soft tolling) or even buy the PET for their own bottles (hard tolling).
Družbe za polnjenje so v dejavnost PET pogosto vključene prek povezanih dejavnosti izdelave plastenk ali sporazumov o podizvajanju s podizvajalcem predelovalcem in/ali izdelovalcem plastenk, za katerega v pogajanjih s proizvajalcem določijo ceno PET („mehko“ podizvajanje) ali celo kupijo PET za svoje plastenke („strogo“ podizvajanje).
converters and/or bottle makers that buy PET directly from producers, convert it into pre-forms (or bottles) and sell it further for downstream processing (or filling), and
predelovalci in/ali izdelovalci plastenk – ki PET kupijo neposredno od proizvajalcev in ga predelajo v predforme (ali plastenke), ki jih prodajo za nadaljnjo fazo v postopku (ali polnjenje), in
bottlers that buy PET for their subcontracting bottle makers/converters (hard tolling) or negotiate the price for which the subcontracted converter and/or bottle maker will get the PET (soft tolling).
polnilci – ki PET kupijo za svoje podizvajalce izdelovalce plastenk/predelovalce („strogo“ podizvajanje) ali v pogajanjih določijo ceno, po kateri bo podizvajalec predelovalec in/ali izdelovalec plastenk kupil PET („mehko“ podizvajanje).
Over 70 users have been contacted in this investigation, but only seven of them (converters and bottlers) decided to cooperate by filling in a questionnaire.
V tej preiskavi je bilo kontaktiranih več kot 70 uporabnikov, vendar se jih je le sedem (predelovalcev in polnilcev) odločilo za sodelovanje z izpolnitvijo vprašalnika.
It has been established that the cooperating users imported only negligible quantities of PET from the country concerned and sourced it predominantly from the Union producers and/or from other countries.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so sodelujoči uporabniki iz zadevne države uvažali le zanemarljive količine PET in ga pretežno pridobivali od proizvajalcev EU in/ali iz drugih držav.
Given that alternative sources of supply continue to exist and that currently the users imported only very limited volumes of the product concerned from the PRC, it is concluded that the continuation of measures against imports from the PRC will not have any significant negative effect on the users in the Union.
Glede na to, da še naprej obstajajo alternativni viri dobave in da so uporabniki zadevni izdelek trenutno uvažali iz LRK le v zelo omejenem obsegu, se sklene, da nadaljevanje ukrepov proti uvozu iz LRK ne bo imelo znatnega negativnega vpliva na uporabnike v Uniji.
Following disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend that the existing measures be maintained some interested parties, in particular users, submitted their comments.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bil predviden predlog za ohranitev obstoječih ukrepov, je predložilo pripombe nekaj zainteresiranih strani, zlasti uporabnikov.
The Union producers that requested the review basically agreed with the findings of the investigation and in particular with the conclusions with regard to the Union interest.
Proizvajalci Unije, ki so zahtevali pregled, so pretežno soglašali z ugotovitvami preiskave in zlasti z zaključki v zvezi z interesom Unije.
On the other hand seven users and one association of users expressed their strong opposition against the reimposition of the current anti-dumping measures, claiming that the Commission’s findings with regard to the Union interest display serious deficiencies and inaccuracies; however, without substantiating their claims any further.
Po drugi strani pa je ponovni uvedbi trenutnih protidampinških ukrepov močno nasprotovalo sedem uporabnikov in eno združenje uporabnikov, ki so trdili, da so ugotovitve Komisije v zvezi z interesom Unije precej pomanjkljive in nenatančne, vendar trditev niso utemeljili.
Given the lack of any evidence that would support the claims with respect to alledged inaccuracy of the Commission’s findings, these claims are rejected as unfunded.
Glede na to, da ni bilo dokazov, ki bi podkrepili trditve v zvezi z domnevno nenatančnostjo ugotovitev Komisije, se te trditve zavrnejo kot neutemeljene.
Following the disclosure the cooperating importing agent also strongly opposed the reimposition of measures.
Po razkritju je ponovni uvedbi ukrepov močno nasprotoval tudi sodelujoči uvozni agent.
This interested party claimed that the Commission failed to properly take into account the interest of the PET users’ industry, that would allegedly suffer from any PET price increase as they would not be in a position to pass forward any cost increase.
Ta zainteresirana stran je trdila, da Komisija ni povsem upoštevala interesov uporabnikov PET, ki naj bi jih kakršno koli zvišanje cen domnevno prizadelo, ker kakršnega koli povišanja stroškov ne bi bili zmožni prenesti naprej.
It is noted in this regard that this interested party failed to demonstrate how in practice the maintainance of already existing measures could lead to any increase of the PET price on the Union market and to what extent.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da ta zainteresirana stran ni pokazala, kako bi ohranitev že obstoječih ukrepov lahko v praksi povzročila kakršni koli zvišanje cene PET na trgu Unije in v kakšnem obsegu.
It is also reiterated that given the relatively low cooperation of users in this investigation, there is no information on the file that would show that the continuation of measures would have disproportionate effects on users.
Ponovno se tudi poudarja, da glede na razmeroma majhen obseg sodelovanja uporabnikov pri tej preiskavi v dokumentaciji ni informacij, ki bi kazale, da bi nadaljevanje ukrepov nesorazmerno vplivalo na uporabnike.
Consequently, based on the information available, it is considered that maintaining the measures will not have any disproportionate negative effects on the level of PET prices in the EU and thus the claim regarding the negative impact on users, as presented by the importing agent, is rejected.
Na podlagi dostopnih informacij se zato šteje, da ohranitev ukrepov ne bo imela nesorazmerno negativnega vpliva na raven cen PET v EU, zato se zavrne trditev glede negativnega vpliva na uporabnike, kot je bila podana s strani uvoznega agenta.
The same interested party claims that the Commission failed to examine the impact of the continuation of current measures on PET packaging companies and that consequently the Union interest analysis in incomplete and incorrect.
Ista zainteresirana stran trdi, da Komisija ni proučila vpliva nadaljevanja trenutnih ukrepov na družbe za embalažo iz PET in da je analiza interesa Unije zato pomanjkljiva in nepravilna.
It is reiterated in this regard that following the initiation of this review only seven users came forward and the information available in the framework of this proceeding did not allow for the analysis of the interest of this sub-group of users in the Union.
V zvezi s tem se ponovno poudarja, da se je po začetku tega pregleda javilo le sedem uporabnikov in da informacije, dostopne v okviru tega postopka, niso omogočale analize interesa te podskupine uporabnikov v Uniji.
The comments submitted after the disclosure, including the comments from packaging companies, were (as indicated above in recitals 101 and 102) not substantiated and could not be used for a more exhaustive analysis concerning the packaging industry.
Pripombe, predložene po razkritju, vključno s pripombami družb za proizvodnjo embalaže (kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 101 in 102, niso bile utemeljene in se niso mogle uporabiti za izčrpnejšo analizo v zvezi s pakirno industrijo.
Taking into account all of the factors outlined above, it is concluded that there are no compelling reasons against the maintenance of the current anti-dumping measures.
Ob upoštevanju vseh navedenih dejavnikov se sklene, da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti ohranitvi trenutnih protidampinških ukrepov.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend that the existing measures be maintained.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti ohranitev obstoječih ukrepov.
The submissions and comments were duly taken into consideration, where warranted.
Stališča in pripombe so bili ustrezno upoštevani, kjer je bilo to upravičeno.
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of PET originating in the PRC should be maintained.
Iz navedenega sledi, kot je določeno v členu 11(2) osnovne uredbe, da je treba ohraniti protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz PET s poreklom iz LRK.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation are solely applicable to imports of the product concerned produced by these companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Individualne stopnje protidampinške dajatve za družbe, določene v tej uredbi, se uporabljajo le za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajajo te družbe in tako določeni navedeni pravni subjekti.
Imports of the product concerned manufactured by any other company not specifically mentioned in Article 1(2) with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki v členu 1(2) ni izrecno navedena z nazivom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani s katerim koli izrecno navedenim subjektom, teh stopenj ne morejo uporabiti in zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [12] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for instance, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh individualnih stopenj protidampinške dajatve (npr. zaradi spremembe imena subjekta ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [12] skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezanimi s spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will then be accordingly amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates,
Ta uredba bo po potrebi ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama družb, upravičenih do individualnih stopenj dajatve –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, currently falling within CN code 39076020 and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz polietilen tereftalata z viskoznostjo 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, trenutno uvrščenega v oznako KN 39076020 in s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union frontier price, before duty, for the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelek iz odstavka 1, ki ga proizvajajo navedene družbe, je:
Yibin Wuliangye Group Push Co., Ltd (Sichuan) and Yibin Wuliangye Group Import & Export Co. Ltd (Sichuan)
Yibin Wuliangye Group Push Co., Ltd. (Sichuan) and Yibin Wuliangye Group Import & Export Co., Ltd (Sichuan)
In cases where goods have been damaged before entry into free circulation and, therefore, the price actually paid or payable is apportioned for the determination of the customs value pursuant to Article 145 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Common Customs Code [13], the amount of anti-dumping duty, calculated on the basis of paragraph 2 above, shall be reduced by a percentage which corresponds to the apportioning of the price actually paid or payable.
Kadar se blago pred vstopom v prosti promet poškoduje in je zato cena, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje, porazdeljena za ugotavljanje carinske vrednosti v skladu s členom 145 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [13], se znesek protidampinške dajatve, izračunane na podlagi odstavka 2, zmanjša za odstotek, ki ustreza porazdelitvi cene, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje.
OJ L 345, 28.12.2005, p. 11.
UL L 345, 28.12.2005, str. 11.
OJ C 5, 10.1.2009, p. 3.
UL C 5, 10.1.2009, str. 3.
OJ C 194, 18.8.2009, p. 9.
UL C 194, 18.8.2009, str. 9.
OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 10.
UL L 254, 29.9.2010, str. 10.
OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 40.
UL L 254, 29.9.2010, str. 40.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, NERV-105, 1049 Brussels, BELGIUM.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate H, NERV-105, 1049 Bruselj, BELGIJA.
The annual labour cost increased by 11 % between 2006 and 2007, before decreasing by 2 percentage points in 2008 compared to 2007 and further 9 percentage points in the RIP compared to 2008 reaching the same level as in 2006.
Letni stroški dela so se med letoma 2006 in 2007 povečali za 11 %, nato so se leta 2008 v primerjavi z letom 2007 zmanjšali za 2 odstotni točki, v OPP pa v primerjavi z letom 2008 za dodatnih 9 odstotnih točk, s čimer so dosegli isto raven kot leta 2006.
It decreased to – 16,8 % in 2008 and increased again in the RIP to – 12,3 %.
Leta 2008 se je zmanjšala na – 16,8 %, v OPP pa se je znova povečala na – 12,3 %.
The sampled companies’ annual investments in the production of the like product decreased by 34 % between 2006 and 2007, by a further 59 percentage points between 2007 and 2008 and then it slightly decreased in the RIP compared to 2008.
Letne naložbe vzorčenih družb v proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka so se med letoma 2006 in 2007 zmanjšale za 34 %, med letoma 2007 in 2008 za dodatnih 59 odstotnih točk, nato pa so se v OPP v primerjavi z letom 2008 le nekoliko zmanjšale.
The net cash flow from operating activities was negative at EUR – 18,5 million in 2006. It improved significantly in 2007 when it became positive at EUR 19,5 million, but deteriorated massively in 2008 (EUR – 42 million) before reaching the negative EUR – 11 million in the RIP. Overall, cash flow improved in the period considered although it remained negative.
Neto denarni tok iz poslovanja je bil leta 2006 negativen, in sicer – 18,5 milijona EUR. Leta 2007 se je znatno izboljšal, ko je z 19,5 milijona EUR dosegel pozitivno raven, vendar se je leta 2008 zelo zmanjšal (– 42 milijonov EUR), nato pa je v OPP dosegel – 11 milijonov EUR. Denarni tok se je v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno izboljšal, čeprav je ostal negativen.
It is noted that with regard to MEG, PET is not its only or even the major possible application and MEG producers are less dependent on the situation of the PET industry. None the less, the difficulties of the PET industry may have some limited impact on the suppliers of MEG, at least in a short to medium term.
V zvezi z MEG je treba opozoriti, da PET ni edini niti glavni izdelek, za proizvodnjo katerega se ta uporablja, zato so proizvajalci MEG manj odvisni od stanja industrije PET. Kljub temu imajo težave industrije PET lahko vsaj kratko- do srednjeročno omejen vpliv na dobavitelje MEG.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1031/2010
on the timing, administration and other aspects of auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community
o časovnem načrtu, upravljanju in drugih vidikih dražbe pravic do emisije toplogrednih plinov na podlagi Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti
Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC [1], and in particular Articles 3d(3) and 10(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. oktobra 2003 o vzpostavitvi sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti in o spremembi Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 3d(3) in člena 10(4) Direktive,
Directive 2003/87/EC was revised and amended by Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community [2] and Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community [3].
Direktiva 2003/87/ES je bila revidirana in spremenjena z Direktivo 2008/101/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o spremembi Direktive 2003/87/ES zaradi vključitve letalskih dejavnosti v sistem za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov v Skupnosti [2] in Direktivo 2009/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spremembi Direktive 2003/87/ES z namenom izboljšanja in razširitve sistema Skupnosti za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov [3].
One of the improvements determined in the revision of Directive 2003/87/EC was that auctioning should be the basic principle for allocation, as it is the simplest and generally considered to be the most economically efficient means of doing so.
Ena od izboljšav, določena pri reviziji Direktive 2003/87/ES, je bila, da mora dodelitev potekati na osnovi dražbe, saj je to najpreprostejši način dodelitve, ki splošno velja tudi za gospodarsko najbolj učinkovitega.
The efficiency of the emissions trading scheme relies on a clear carbon price signal to achieve abatement of greenhouse gas emissions at least cost.
Učinkovitost sistema za trgovanje z emisijami je odvisna od jasnega signala glede cen ogljika, da se zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov doseže z najnižjimi stroški.
Auctioning should support and strengthen such a carbon price signal.
Dražba bi morala podpirati in krepiti takšen signal glede cen ogljika.
Article 10(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC requires Member States to auction allowances covered by Chapter III of that Directive not allocated free of charge.
Člen 10(1) Direktive 2003/87/ES vsebuje zahtevo, da države članice na dražbi prodajo vse pravice, zajete v poglavju III te direktive, ki niso dodeljene brezplačno.
Thus, Member States must auction allowances not allocated free of charge.
Države članice morajo torej pravice, ki niso dodeljene brezplačno, ponuditi na dražbi.
They may not use any other means of allocation, nor could they withhold or cancel allowances not allocated for free instead of auctioning them.
Uporabljati ne smejo nobenega drugega načina dodelitve, niti ne morejo zadržati ali preklicati pravic, ki niso bile dodeljene brezplačno, namesto da bi jih ponudile na dražbi.
Article 10(4) of Directive 2003/87/EC lays down various objectives for the auctioning process.
Člen 10(4) Direktive 2003/87/ES določa različne cilje postopka dražbe.
It should be predictable, in particular as regards the timing and sequencing of auctions and the estimated volumes of allowances to be made available.
Postopek bi moral biti predvidljiv, zlasti kar zadeva časovni načrt in zaporedje dražb ter ocenjene količine pravic, ki bodo na razpolago.
Auctions should be designed to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises covered by the emissions trading scheme have full, fair and equitable access, that small emitters are granted access, that participants have access to information at the same time, that participants do not undermine the operation of the auctions, and that the organisation of and participation in the auctions is cost-efficient avoiding undue administrative costs.
Dražbe bi morale biti oblikovane tako, da se zagotovi, da imajo mala in srednje velika podjetja, ki so vključena v sistem za trgovanje z emisijami, poln, pravičen in enakovreden dostop, da se omogoči dostop za male onesnaževalce, da imajo vsi sodelujoči istočasno dostop do informacij, da sodelujoči ne ogrozijo delovanja dražbe ter da sta organizacija in udeležba na dražbah stroškovno učinkoviti, tako da se preprečijo neupravičeni upravni stroški.
These objectives should be read in the context of the overarching aims of the revision of Directive 2003/87/EC, which include, inter alia, more harmonisation, avoidance of distortions of competition and greater predictability, all of which should reinforce the carbon price signal to achieve abatement of emissions at least cost.
Te cilje je treba razumeti v okviru glavnih ciljev revizije Direktive 2003/87/ES, ki med drugim vključujejo boljšo usklajenost, preprečevanje izkrivljanj konkurence in večjo predvidljivost, kar bi moralo okrepiti signal glede cen ogljika, da se doseže zmanjšanje emisij z najnižjimi stroški.
Indeed, the increased emissions reduction effort requires the highest possible degree of economic efficiency on the basis of fully harmonised conditions of allocation within the Union.
Okrepljena prizadevanja za zmanjšanje emisij dejansko zahtevajo največjo možno gospodarsko učinkovitost na osnovi popolnoma usklajenih pogojev dodelitve znotraj Unije.
Article 3d(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC provides for the auctioning of 15 % of allowances covered by Chapter II of that Directive in the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012 whilst Article 3d(2) provides for the auctioning of the same percentage of allowances covered by Chapter II of Directive 2003/87/EC in the period from 1 January 2013 onwards.
Člen 3d(1) Direktive 2003/87/ES določa dražbo 15 % pravic iz poglavja II navedene direktive za obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do 31. decembra 2012, medtem ko člen 3d(2) določa dražbo enakega odstotka pravic iz poglavja II Direktive 2003/87/ES za obdobje od 1. januarja 2013 dalje.
Article 3d(3) requires the adoption of a regulation containing detailed provisions for the auctioning by Member States of allowances covered by Chapter II not required to be issued free of charge in accordance with Article 3d(1) and (2) or Article 3f(8) of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Člen 3d(3) zahteva, da se sprejme uredba s podrobnimi določbami, ki državam članicam omogočajo dražbo pravic iz poglavja II, ki jih ni treba izdati brezplačno, v skladu s členom 3d(1) in (2) ali členom 3f(8) Direktive 2003/87/ES.