natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Judgments of the Court of Justice in Case C-234/99 Nygard [2002] ECR I-3657, paragraph 22; Case C-28/96 Fricarnes SA [1997] ECR I-4939, paragraph 23; Case 73/79 Commission v Italy [1980] ECR 1533, paragraph 15, and Case C-78/90 to C-83/90 Compagnie commerciale de l’Ouest and Others [1992] ECR I-1847, paragraph 26.
Sodbe Sodišča z dne 23. aprila 2002 v zadevi Nygard (C-234/99, Recueil, str. I-3657, točka 22); z dne 17. septembra 1997 v zadevi Fricarnes SA (C-28/96, Recueil, str. I-4939, točka 23); z dne 21. maja 1980 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji (73/79, Recueil, str. 1533, točka 15) in z dne 11. marca 1992 v združenih zadevah Compagnie commerciale de l’Ouest in drugi (od C-78/90 do C-83/90, Recueil, str. I-1847, točka 26).
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case T-369/06 Holland Malt v Commission (not yet published), paragraphs 195 et seq.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 9. septembra 2009 v zadevi Holland Malt proti Komisiji (T-369/06, še neobjavljena v ZOdl., točka 195 in naslednje).
Judgments in Joined Cases C-261/01 and C-262/01 Van Calster and Others [2003] ECR I-12249, paragraph 48, and Case 73/79 Commission v Italy [1980] ECR 1533, paragraph 11.
Sodbi Sodišča z dne 21. oktobra 2003 v združenih zadevah van Calster (C-261/01 in C-262/01, Recueil, str. I-12249, točka 48) in z dne 21. maja 1980 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji (73/79, Recueil, str. 1533, točka 11).
See footnote 32.
Glej opombo 32.
The Permanent Representation of Portugal to the European Union replied to the Commission by letter of 14 March 2003.
Stalno predstavništvo Portugalske pri Evropski uniji je Komisiji odgovorilo z dopisom z dne 14. marca 2003.
Additional information was sent by letters of 4 August, 2 September 2003, 24 February and 15 July 2004 in response to the questions asked by the Commission by faxes of 14 May and 22 December 2003.
Dodatne informacije so bile poslane v dopisih z dne 4. avgusta 2003, 2. septembra 2003, 24. februarja 2004 in 15. julija 2004, s katerimi je odgovorilo na vprašanja, ki so jih službe Komisije postavile v telefaksih z dne 14. maja in 22. decembra 2003.
The Portuguese authorities submitted their observations by letters dated 11 and 13 January 2005.
Portugalski organi so pripombe predložili v dopisih z dne 11. in 13. januarja 2005.
They supplemented their reply by letter of 24 May 2006.
Odgovor so dopolnili z dopisom z dne 24. maja 2006.
The Commission did not receive any observations from interested third parties.
Komisija od tretjih zainteresiranih strani ni prejela pripomb.
Following the decision to initiate the procedure under Article 108(2) of the TFEU, the Portuguese authorities sent their observations by letters dated 11 and 13 January 2005.
Portugalski organi so po odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka v skladu s členom 108(2) PDEU predložili pripombe v dopisih z dne 11. in 13. januarja 2005.
They supplemented their reply by a letter of 24 May 2006.
Odgovor so dopolnili z dopisom z dne 24. maja 2006.
The Portuguese authorities have also provided samples of the advertising campaigns and public awareness projects funded by the charge.
Portugalski organi so tako predložili vzorce oglasov kampanj in načrtov širjenja, financiranih z dajatvijo.
Insofar as the promotion campaigns are intended to promote the consumption of wine in general, imported products benefit to the same extent from the abovementioned measures.
Ker je namen promocijskih kampanj spodbujati uživanje vina na splošno, so uvoženi proizvodi v enakem obsegu upravičeni do navedenih ukrepov.
Although the system of aid instituted by Decree-Law No 119/97 only entered into force in the second half of 1997, Viniportugal only really began conducting promotion and advertising activities in 1998.
Ker je shema pomoči, uvedena z zakonskim odlokom št. 119/97, začela veljati šele v drugem polletju leta 1997, je Viniportugal promocijske in oglaševalske dejavnosti začel izvajati šele leta 1998.
Accordingly, only the revenue obtained by the IVV from 1998 will be taken into account for the purposes of this decision.
Zato se bodo za namene tega sklepa upoštevali le prihodki, ki jih je IVV prejel od leta 1998.)
There are no data for 2000.
Podatki za leto 2000 niso na voljo.
of 9 May 2011
z dne 9. maja 2011
amending Decision ECB/2004/3 on public access to European Central Bank documents
o spremembah Sklepa ECB/2004/3 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropske centralne banke
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 12.3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke, ter zlasti člena 12.3 Statuta,
Having regard to Decision ECB/2004/2 of 19 February 2004 adopting the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank [1], and in particular Article 23 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa ECB/2004/2 z dne 19. februarja 2004 o sprejetju Poslovnika Evropske centralne banke [1], ter zlasti člena 23 Sklepa,
Pursuant to Article 127(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Council may confer specific tasks upon the European Central Bank (ECB) concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions and other financial institutions with the exception of insurance undertakings.
V skladu s členom 127(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije lahko Svet na Evropsko centralno banko (ECB) prenese posebne naloge, ki se nanašajo na politike bonitetnega nadzora kreditnih in drugih finančnih institucij, razen zavarovalnic.
The Council has exercised this option and pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1096/2010 of 17 November 2010 conferring specific tasks upon the European Central Bank concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board [2] has conferred on the ECB the task of ensuring the Secretariat to the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) thereby providing analytical, statistical, logistical and administrative support to the ESRB.
Svet je to možnost uporabil in je v členu 2 Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1096/2010 z dne 17. novembra 2010 o dodelitvi posebnih nalog Evropski centralni banki v zvezi z delovanjem Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja [2] ECB dodelil opravljanje nalog sekretariata Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja (ESRB) in s tem zagotavljanje analitične, statistične, logistične in administrativne podpore ESRB.
In this context, the ECB will also draw up or hold documents relating to its ESRB-related activities and policies or decisions which will qualify as ECB documents within the meaning of Decision ECB/2004/3 of 4 March 2004 on public access to European Central Bank documents [3].
V tem okviru bo ECB tudi sestavljala ali hranila dokumente v zvezi s svojimi dejavnostmi in politikami ali odločitvami, povezanimi z ESRB, ki bodo spadali med dokumente ECB v smislu Sklepa ECB/2004/3 z dne 4. marca 2004 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropske centralne banke [3].
While pursuant to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1096/2010, the Secretariat of the ESRB ensures the application of Decision ECB/2004/3 which defines the conditions and limits according to which the ESRB must give access to ESRB documents, the ECB should adapt Decision ECB/2004/3 to reflect the fact that the ECB will draw up or hold documents relating to its ESRB-related activities and policies or decisions which will qualify as ECB documents within the meaning of Decision ECB/2004/3.
Sekretariat ESRB v skladu s členom 7(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1096/2010 zagotavlja, da se uporablja Sklep ECB/2004/3, ki opredeljuje pogoje in omejitve, v skladu s katerimi mora ESRB omogočiti dostop do dokumentov ESRB, ECB pa mora Sklep ECB/2004/3 prilagoditi glede na dejstvo, da bo ECB sestavljala ali hranila dokumente v zvezi s svojimi dejavnostmi in politikami ali odločitvami, povezanimi z ESRB, ki bodo spadali med dokumente ECB v smislu Sklepa ECB/2004/3.
There is a need to ensure that the ECB can refuse access to documents relating to its activities and policies or decisions pursuant to Article 127(5) and (6) of the Treaty drawn up or held by it in the field of financial stability, including those relating to its support to the ESRB, where their disclosure would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards the stability of the financial system in the Union.
Treba je zagotoviti, da bo ECB lahko zavrnila dostop do dokumentov, ki jih sama sestavlja ali hrani ter so povezani z njenimi dejavnostmi in politikami ali odločitvami v skladu s členom 127(5) in (6) Pogodbe na področju finančne stabilnosti, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani z njeno podporo ESRB, kadar bi njihovo razkritje oslabilo varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva stabilnost finančnega sistema v Uniji.
The necessary amendments should also be made to Decision ECB/2004/3 to reflect terminology changes and article renumbering following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon,
Sklep ECB/2004/3 je treba spremeniti tudi zato, da se bodo odrazile spremembe terminologije in preštevilčenje členov, ki je bilo uveljavljeno z Lizbonsko pogodbo –
Decision ECB/2004/3 is amended as follows:
Sklep ECB/2004/3 se spremeni:
Article 4(1) is amended as follows:
člen 4(1) se spremeni:
in point (a) the following indent is added:
v točki (a) se doda naslednja alinea:
the stability of the financial system in the Union or in a Member State;’;
stabilnost finančnega sistema v Uniji ali državi članici;“;
the word ‘Community’ is replaced by ‘Union’;
beseda „Skupnosti“ se nadomesti z „Unije“;
‘As regards requests for access to European Systemic Risk Board documents, Decision ESRB/2011/5 of the European Systemic Risk Board of 3 June 2011 on public access to European Systemic Risk Board documents, adopted on the basis of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1096/2010 of 17 November 2010 conferring specific tasks upon the European Central Bank concerning the functioning of the European Systemic Risk Board, shall apply.(3) in Article 8 the references to Article 230 are replaced by references to Article 263 and references to Article 195 by references to Article 228 of the Treaty.
„Glede zahtev za dostop do dokumentov Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja se uporablja Sklep ESRB/2011/5 Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja z dne 3. junija 2011 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja, ki je bil sprejet na podlagi člena 7 Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1096/2010 z dne 17. novembra 2010 o dodelitvi posebnih nalog Evropski centralni banki v zvezi z delovanjem Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja.3. v členu 8 se sklicevanje na člen 230 Pogodbe nadomesti s sklicevanjem na člen 263, sklicevanje na člen 195 Pogodbe pa s sklicevanjem na člen 228.
This Decision shall enter into force on 18 June 2011.
Ta sklep začne veljati 18. junija 2011.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 9 May 2011.
V Frankfurtu na Majni, 9. maja 2011
OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 162.
UL L 331, 15.12.2010, str. 162.
OJ C 176, 16.6.2011, p. 3.
UL C 176, 16.6.2011, str. 3.
OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 162.’;
UL L 331, 15.12.2010, str. 162.“;
of 7 January 2011
z dne 7. januarja 2011
amending Annex XI to Council Directive 2003/85/EC as regards the list of laboratories authorised to handle live foot-and-mouth disease virus
o spremembi Priloge XI k Direktivi Sveta 2003/85/ES glede seznama laboratorijev, pooblaščenih za ravnanje z živim virusom slinavke in parkljevke
Having regard to Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease repealing Directive 85/511/EEC and Decisions 89/531/EEC and 91/665/EEC and amending Directive 92/46/EEC [1], and in particular Article 67(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2003/85/ES z dne 29. septembra 2003 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke, ki razveljavlja Direktivo 85/511/EGS in odločbi 89/531/EGS in 91/665/EGS ter spreminja Direktivo 92/46/EGS [1], in zlasti člena 67(2) Direktive,
Directive 2003/85/EC sets out minimum control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease and certain preventive measures aimed at increasing the awareness and preparedness of the competent authorities and the farming community concerning that disease.
Direktiva 2003/85/ES določa minimalne nadzorne ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo v primeru izbruha slinavke in parkljevke, ter nekatere preventivne ukrepe za boljšo ozaveščenost o zadevni bolezni ter pripravljenost pristojnih organov in kmetijskega prebivalstva nanjo.
Those preventive measures include an obligation on Member States to ensure that the handling of foot-and-mouth disease virus for research and diagnosis is carried out only in the authorised national laboratories listed in Part A of Annex XI to Directive 2003/85/EC.
Navedeni preventivni ukrepi vključujejo obveznost, da države članice zagotovijo, da ravnanje z virusom slinavke in parkljevke za raziskave in diagnostiko poteka le v odobrenih laboratorijih iz dela A Priloge XI k Direktivi 2003/85/ES.
France has officially informed the Commission that the name of its national laboratory listed in Part A of Annex XI to Directive 2003/85/EC situated in France has changed.
Francija je uradno obvestila Komisijo o spremembi imena njenega nacionalnega laboratorija iz dela A Priloge XI k Direktivi 2003/85/ES, ki stoji v Franciji.
For legal certainty, it is important to keep the list of laboratories set out in Part A of that Annex updated.
Zaradi pravne varnosti je pomembno posodabljati seznam laboratorijev iz dela A navedene priloge.
Therefore, it is necessary to replace the entry for France in the list of laboratories set out in Part A of Annex XI to Directive 2003/85/EC.
Zato je treba na seznamu laboratorijev iz dela A Priloge XI k Direktivi 2003/85/ES nadomestiti vnos za Francijo.
In Part A of Annex XI to Directive 2003/85/EC, the entry for France is replaced by the following:
V delu A Priloge XI k Direktivi 2003/85/ES se vnos za Francijo nadomesti z naslednjim:
Done at Brussels, 7 January 2011.
V Bruslju, 7. januarja 2011
of 6 January 2011
z dne 6. januarja 2011
concerning certain interim protection measures against foot-and-mouth disease in Bulgaria
o nekaterih prehodnih zaščitnih ukrepih proti slinavki in parkljevki v Bolgariji
A case of foot-and-mouth disease (‘FMD’) has been detected in a wild boar in Burgas region in the South-East of Bulgaria within a zone of reinforced surveillance along the border with Turkey.
Primer slinavke in parkljevke je bil ugotovljen pri divjem prašiču v regiji Burgas v jugovzhodnem delu Bolgarije na območju z okrepljenim nadzorom vzdolž meje s Turčijo.
The FMD situation in Bulgaria is liable to endanger the herds of other Member States in view of trade in live biungulate animals and the placing on the market of certain of their products.
Stanje slinavke in parkljevke v Bolgariji lahko ogrozi črede v drugih državah članicah, če se na trg da žive parkljarje in nekatere proizvode iz njih.
Bulgaria has taken measures in the framework of Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease [3] (‘the Directive’), in particular the measures provide for in Article 85(4) of that Directive and detailed in Annex XVIII thereto.
Bolgarija je sprejela ukrepe v okviru Direktive Sveta 2003/85/ES z dne 29. septembra 2003 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Direktiva), zlasti ukrepe iz člena 85(4) in Priloge XVIII navedene direktive.
The whole territory of Bulgaria is subject to the restrictions of Articles 2, 4, 5, 6, 8b and 11 of Commission Decision 2008/855/EC of 3 November 2008 concerning animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in certain Member States [4].
Za celotno ozemlje Bolgarije veljajo omejitve iz členov 2, 4, 5, 6, 8b in 11 Odločbe Komisije 2008/855/ES z dne 3. novembra 2008 glede nadzornih ukrepov za zdravje živali v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v nekaterih državah članicah [4].
However, being listed in Part II of Annex I to that Decision allows Bulgaria to dispatch under certain health conditions fresh pig meat and meat preparations and products produced from such meat.
Vendar navedba Bolgarije v delu II Priloge I k navedeni odločbi Bolgariji dovoljuje, da v skladu z nekaterimi zdravstvenimi pogoji odpremlja sveže prašičje meso in mesne pripravke ter proizvode iz takega mesa.
The disease situation in Bulgaria makes it necessary to reinforce the control measures for FMD taken by the competent authorities in Bulgaria.
Stanje bolezni v Bolgariji zahteva povečanje nadzornih ukrepov za slinavko in parkljevko, ki jih izvajajo pristojni organi Bolgarije.
It is appropriate to define as a permanent measure the high and low risk areas in the affected Member State and to provide for a prohibition on the dispatch of susceptible animals from the high and low risk areas and on the dispatch of products derived from susceptible animals from the high risk area.
Primerno je kot stalni ukrep opredeliti območja visokega in nizkega tveganja v prizadetih državah članicah ter uvesti prepoved odpreme dovzetnih živali z območij visokega in nizkega tveganja ter odpreme proizvodov, ki izvirajo od dovzetnih živali z območja visokega tveganja.
The Decision should also provide for the rules applicable to the dispatch from those areas of safe products that either had been produced before the restrictions, from raw material sourced from outside the restricted areas or that had undergone a treatment proven effective in inactivating possible foot-and-mouth disease virus.
Sklep mora določiti tudi pravila, ki se uporabljajo za odpremo varnih proizvodov s teh območij, ki so bili proizvedeni pred uvedbo omejitev iz surovin, ki izvirajo z območij zunaj zaprtih območij, ali so bili obdelani na način, ki je dokazano učinkovit za inaktivacijo morebitnega virusa slinavke in parkljevke.
At this point of time and based on information provided by Bulgaria, the whole of Burgas region should currently remain a high risk area.
Trenutno mora regija Burgas v celoti na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Bolgarija, ostati območje visokega tveganja.
Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption [9] concerns, amongst others, the health marking of food of animal origin.
Uredba (ES) št. 854/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o določitvi posebnih predpisov za organizacijo uradnega nadzora proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi [9], med drugim zadeva označevanje zdravstvene ustreznosti živil živalskega izvora.
Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [10] provides for specific treatment of meat products that ensure inactivation of the FMD virus in products of animal origin.
Direktiva Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [10], določa posebno obdelavo mesnih proizvodov, ki zagotavlja inaktivacijo virusa slinavke in parkljevke v proizvodih živalskega izvora.
It is appropriate to lay down in a separate Annex a similar marking in the case of FMD in Bulgaria.
Primerno je, da se v primeru slinavke in parkljevke v Bolgariji podobno označevanje določi v ločeni prilogi.
Council Directive 92/118/EEC [12] lays down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC.
Direktiva Sveta 92/118/EGS [12] določa zahteve zdravstvenega varstva živali in javnozdravstvenega varstva, ki urejajo trgovino in uvoz v Skupnost za proizvode, za katere zahteve iz posebnih pravil Skupnosti, navedenih v Prilogi A (I) k Direktivi 89/662/ES ter, v zvezi s patogeni, k Direktivi 90/425/EGS, ne veljajo.
Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption [13] provides for a range of treatments of animal by-products suitable to inactivate the FMD virus.
Uredba (ES) št. 1774/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 2002 o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi [13], določa vrsto obdelav stranskih živalskih proizvodov, ki so primerne za inaktivacijo virusa slinavke in parkljevke.
The model health certificates for trade within the Union in semen, ova and embryos of animals of the ovine and caprine species and in ova and embryos of animals of the porcine species are laid down in Commission Decision 2010/470/EU of 26 August 2010 laying down model health certificates for trade within the Union in semen, ova and embryos of animals of the equine, ovine and caprine species and in ova and embryos of animals of the porcine species [17].
Vzorci veterinarskih spričeval za trgovino znotraj Unije s semenom, jajčnimi celicami in zarodki enoprstih kopitarjev, ovc in koz ter jajčnimi celicami in zarodki prašičev Sklep Komisije 2010/470/EU z dne 26. avgusta 2010 o vzorcih veterinarskih spričeval za trgovino znotraj Unije s semenom, jajčnimi celicami in zarodki enoprstih kopitarjev, ovc in koz ter jajčnimi celicami in zarodki prašičev [17].
Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field [18] provides for a mechanism to compensate affected holdings for losses incurred as a result of disease control measures.
Odločba Sveta 2009/470/EGS z dne 25. maja 2009 o odhodkih na področju veterine [18] določa mehanizem nadomestil za izgube, ki so na prizadetih gospodarstvih nastale zaradi nadzornih ukrepov za obvladovanje bolezni.
In so far as medicinal products defined in Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products [19], Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use [20], and Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use [21] no longer fall under the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 they should be excluded from animal health related restrictions set up by this Decision.
Če zdravila, ki jih določajo Direktiva 2001/82/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini [19], Direktiva 2001/83/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v humani medicini [20] in Direktiva 2001/20/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. aprila 2001 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi z izvajanjem dobre klinične prakse pri kliničnem preskušanju zdravil za ljudi [21], niso več v pristojnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002, se ta zdravila izključijo iz prepovedi v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki jih določa ta sklep.
Member States other than Bulgaria should support the disease control measures carried out in the affected areas by ensuring that live susceptible animals are not consigned to those areas.
Države članice razen Bolgarije morajo podpirati nadzorne ukrepe za obvladovanje bolezni, ki se izvajajo na okuženih območjih, tako da na ta območja ne odpremljajo živih dovzetnih živali.