natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The specific duties are based on the cif values of the cooperating companies’ Union exports in the IP, converted to euro using monthly exchange rates, multiplied by the lower of the dumping and the injury margins in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Posebne dajatve temeljijo na vrednostih CIF izvoza v Unijo sodelujočih družb v OP, pretvorjenih v EUR z mesečnimi menjalnimi tečaji, pomnoženih s stopnjami dampinga ali stopnjami škode, kar koli je nižje, v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
In this respect, two exporting producers claimed that the yearly average exchange rate should be used instead of the monthly.
Glede tega sta dva proizvajalca izvoznika trdila, da je treba namesto mesečnega uporabiti letni povprečni menjalni tečaj.
However, it is noted that in accordance with the standard practice, any conversion of currencies in anti-dumping investigations is made using the monthly exchange rates.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v skladu z običajno prakso kakršna koli pretvorba valut v protidampinških preiskavah opravljena z mesečnim menjalnim tečajem.
This was the cases also for this investigation.
Tako je bilo tudi v tej preiskavi.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Trditev se je zato zavrnila.
The complainant claimed that when establishing the specific duties, current FOH prices and not cif values during the IP should have been used.
Pritožnik je trdil, da bi morale biti pri določanju posebnih dajatev uporabljene sedanje cene maščobnih alkoholov in njihovih mešanic in ne vrednosti CIF v OP.
It should be noted that specific duties are established based on the dumping and injury calculations for the IP.
Opozoriti je treba, da so posebne dajatve določene glede na izračun dampinga in škode za OP.
No substantiated arguments have been put forward for basing the calculations of the specific duties in this case on a period after the IP.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni utemeljeni argumenti, po katerih bi izračun posebnih dajatev v tem primeru temeljil na obdobju po OP.
Therefore this claim has been rejected.
Zato se ta trditev zavrne.
Imposition of the definitive measures
Uvedba dokončnih ukrepov
After the publication of provisional measures a potential exporting producer came forward and claimed that the residual duty rate should be set at the level of the highest duty imposed and not of the highest dumping margin found for Indonesia.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov je potencialni proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je treba stopnjo preostale dajatve določiti na ravni najvišje uvedene dajatve in ne najvišje stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene za Indonezijo.
However, the residual duty is set at the residual dumping or the residual injury margin by applying the lesser duty rule.
Vendar se preostala dajatev določi na preostali stopnji dampinga ali preostali stopnji škode na podlagi pravila nižje dajatve.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed in respect of imports of the product concerned at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Glede na navedeno se šteje, da je treba v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe dokončne protidampinške ukrepe uvesti za uvoz zadevnega izdelka na ravni nižjih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev.
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to final disclosure.
Določen je bil tudi rok, v katerem so lahko po dokončnem razkritju predložile svoja stališča.
The comments submitted by the parties were duly considered, and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Po ustrezni preučitvi pripomb, ki so jih predložile strani, so bile ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
The proposed definitive anti-dumping duties are the following:
Predlagane dokončne protidampinške dajatve so:
Definitive specific anti-dumping duty (EUR per tonne net)
Dokončna posebna protidampinška dajatev (EUR neto na tono)
Imports of the product concerned manufactured by any other company not specifically mentioned in this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and should be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki v členu 1 ni izrecno navedena z imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani z izrecno navedenimi družbami, teh stopenj ne more koristiti, pri čemer se zanjo uporablja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [10] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for instance, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena subjekta ali ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) se takoj naslovi na Komisijo [10] skupaj z vsemi ustreznimi informacijami, zlasti o kakršni koli spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje, domače prodaje in izvoza, povezanimi na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, this Regulation should then be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual anti-dumping duty rates.
Ta uredba bo po potrebi ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama družb, upravičenih do individualnih stopenj protidampinških dajatev.
One Indian as well as one Malaysian exporting producer, together with its related importer, offered a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
En indijski in en malezijski proizvajalec izvoznik sta skupaj s svojimi povezanimi uvozniki predložila ponudbo cenovne zaveze v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
Both undertaking offers contained a high number of product groups (determined by the chemical specification), each group subject to a different minimum import price (MIP), with price differences between the groups up to 25 % for the Malaysian exporter and up to 100 % for the Indian exporter.
Obe ponudbi cenovne zaveze sta vsebovali veliko število skupin proizvodov (določenih s kemijsko specifikacijo), pri čemer se za vsako skupino uporablja drugačna minimalna uvozna cena, cenovne razlike med skupinami pa so do 25 % za malezijskega izvoznika in do 100 % za indijskega izvoznika.
In addition, prices varied up to 20 % within the individual groups, thus posing a very high risk of cross-compensation.
Poleg tega so cene znotraj posamezne skupine nihale do 20 % in predstavljale veliko tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije.
It was also noted that the offer of the Indian exporter did not address the volatility of prices of the product concerned.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da ponudba indijskega izvoznika ni obravnavala nestanovitnosti cen zadevnega izdelka.
Additional cross-compensation risks were identified with regards to the Malaysian exporter and its related importer in the Union who did not only source the product concerned from the Malaysian exporter but also from other suppliers.
Ugotovljena so bila dodatna tveganja navzkrižne kompenzacije pri malezijskem izvozniku in njegovem povezanem uvozniku v Unijo, ki ni le priskrbel zadevnega izdelka od malezijskega izvoznika, ampak tudi od drugih dobaviteljev.
Finally, it would be difficult for customs to determine the chemical specification of the product without individual analysis, thus rendering the monitoring very burdensome, if not impracticable.
Carinski organi bi težko določili kemijske specifikacije izdelka brez posamezne analize, zaradi česar bi bilo spremljanje zelo obremenjeno, če ne celo neizvedljivo.
The undertaking offers were therefore rejected.
Ponudbi cenovne zaveze sta bili zato zavrnjeni.
Following the proposal to change the form of the measures, one exporting producer amended its undertaking offer suggesting an average MIP for all product groups and claiming that there will be no risk of cross-compensation any longer.
Po predlogu za spremembo oblike ukrepov je en proizvajalec izvoznik spremenil svojo ponudbo cenovne zaveze in predlagal povprečno minimalno izvozno ceno za vse skupine izdelkov ter trdil, da tveganja navzkrižne kompenzacije ne bo več.
The other exporting producer simply upheld its offer.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik je le potrdil svojo ponudbo.
However, given the number of product types and the price variation between them, an MIP could completely compromise the effectiveness of the measures.
Vendar bi glede na število vrst izdelka in nihanje cen med njimi minimalna uvozna cena ogrozila učinkovitost celotnih ukrepov.
Furthermore, the structure of the companies and of their offers as outlined above still constitutes an obstacle towards accepting an undertaking.
Navedena struktura podjetij in njihovih ponudb še vedno ovira sprejemanje zaveze.
The reporting and price regime suggested by one exporter does not address those concerns and in any case would render the monitoring very burdensome, if not impracticable.
Režim poročanja in cen, ki ga je predlagal en izvoznik, ne obravnava navedenih skrbi, zato bi bilo spremljanje v vsakem primeru obremenjeno ali celo neizvedljivo.
Consequently, the undertaking offers cannot be accepted.
Ponudbi cenovne zaveze zato ne moreta biti sprejeti.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the definitive duties imposed by this Regulation.
Glede na višino ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Unije, se šteje za nujno, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, ki je bila uvedena z začasno uredbo, dokončno poberejo v višini zneska uvedenih dokončnih dajatev.
Where the definitive duties are lower than the provisional duties, amounts provisionally secured in excess of the definitive rate of anti-dumping duties should be released,
Kadar so dokončne dajatve nižje od začasnih, se začasno zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo dokončno stopnjo protidampinških dajatev, sprostijo –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of saturated fatty alcohols with a carbon chain length of C8, C10, C12, C14, C16 or C18 (not including branched isomers) including single saturated fatty alcohols (also referred to as ‘single cuts’) and blends predominantly containing a combination of carbon chain lengths C6-C8, C6-C10, C8-C10, C10-C12 (commonly categorised as C8-C10), blends predominantly containing a combination of carbon chain lengths C12-C14, C12-C16, C12-C18, C14-C16 (commonly categorised as C12-C14) and blends predominantly containing a combination of carbon chain lengths C16-C18, currently falling within CN codes ex29051685, 29051700, ex29051900 and ex38237000 (TARIC codes 2905168510, 2905190060, 3823700011 and 3823700091) and originating in India, Indonesia, and Malaysia.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz nasičenih maščobnih alkoholov z ogljikovim številom C8, C10, C12, C14, C16 ali C18 (razen razvejenih izomerov), vključno z enojnimi nasičenimi maščobnimi alkoholi (imenovanimi tudi „čiste frakcije“ ali „single cuts“) in mešanicami, sestavljenimi zlasti iz kombinacije ogljikovih števil C6-C8, C6-C10, C8-C10, C10-C12 (običajno razvrščenimi v C8-C10), mešanicami, sestavljenimi zlasti iz kombinacije ogljikovih števil C12-C14, C12-C16, C12-C18, C14-C16 (običajno razvrščenimi v C12-C14), in mešanicami, sestavljenimi zlasti iz kombinacije ogljikovih števil C16-C18, trenutno uvrščenih v oznake KN ex29051685, 29051700, ex29051900 in ex38237000 (oznake TARIC 2905168510, 2905190060, 3823700011 in 3823700091), s poreklom iz Indije, Indonezije in Malezije.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty of the products described in paragraph 1 and produced by the companies below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve izdelka iz odstavka 1, ki so ga proizvedle spodnje družbe, je naslednja:
Definitive anti-dumping duty (EUR per tonne net)
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev (EUR neto na tono)
In cases where goods have been damaged before entry into free circulation and, therefore, the price actually paid or payable is apportioned for the determination of the customs value pursuant to Article 145 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [11], the amount of anti-dumping duty, calculated on the amounts set above, shall be reduced by a percentage which corresponds to the apportioning of the price actually paid or payable.
Če je bilo blago poškodovano pred vstopom v prosti promet in se cene, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo, porazdelijo za določitev carinske vrednosti v skladu s členom 145 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [11], se znesek protidampinške dajatve, izračunane glede na zgoraj določene zneske, zmanjša za odstotek, ki ustreza razdelitvi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo.
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 446/2011 shall be definitively collected.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 446/2011, se dokončno poberejo.
The amounts secured in excess of the rates of the definitive anti-dumping duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo stopnje protidampinške dajatve, se sprostijo.
OJ L 122, 11.5.2011, p. 47.
UL L 122, 11.5.2011, str. 47.
Case C-175/87, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd and Matsushita Electric Trading Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities, [1992] ECR I, p. 1409.
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd in Matsushita Electric Trading Co. Ltd proti Svetu Evropskih skupnosti, zadeva C-175/87, sodba Sodišča z dne 10. marca 1992, (1992) ECR I, str. 1409.
Case T-249/06, Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT v Council of the European Union, [2009] ECR II, p. 383.
Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT in Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT proti Svetu Evropske unije, zadeva T-249/06, sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 10. marca 2009, (2009) ECR II, str. 383.
Case C-171/87, Canon Inc v Council of the European Communities, [1992] ECR I, p. 1237.
Canon Inc proti Svetu Evropskih skupnosti, zadeva C-171/87, sodba Sodišča z dne 10. marca 1992, (1992) ECR I, str. 1237.
For instance in Commission Regulation (EC) No 862/2005 of 7 June 2005 imposing provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) originating in Russia and the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 144, 8.6.2005, p. 11) and in Commission Regulation (EC) No 390/2007 of 11 April 2007 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxosulphates (persulphates) originating in the United States of America, the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan (OJ L 97, 12.4.2007, p. 6).
Na primer v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 862/2005 z dne 7. junija 2005 o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz politetrafluoroetilena (PTFE) v obliki granul s poreklom iz Rusije in Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 144, 8.6.2005, str. 11) in v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 390/2007 z dne 11. aprila 2007 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz peroksisulfatov (persulfatov) s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike, Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana (UL L 97, 12.4.2007, str. 6).
WT/DS141/AB/R, adopted 12 March 2001.
WT/DS141/AB/R, sprejeto 12. marca 2001.
Council Regulation (EC) No 260/2007 of 9 March 2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain tungsten electrodes originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 72, 13.3.2007, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 260/2007 z dne 9.3.2007 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 72, 13.3.2007, str. 1).
Both exporting producers acknowledged that their sale prices in the second half of the IP were higher than those in the first half of the IP but they claimed that this trend was due exclusively to an increase in the costs of raw materials and to the general improvement in the market conditions following the end of the economic crisis, and did not reflect the appreciation of the Indian Rupee against the euro. Moreover, the companies claimed that even if they were able to adjust their prices regularly and at short intervals, they would never be able to predict exactly the developments in the exchange rates for a future period.
Oba proizvajalca izvoznika sta potrdila, da so bile njune prodajne cene v drugi polovici OP višje kot v prvi polovici OP, vendar sta trdila, da je bil ta trend izključno posledica povečanja stroškov surovin in splošnega izboljšanja tržnih razmer po koncu gospodarske krize ter ni odražal apreciacije INR do EUR. Poleg tega sta družbi trdili, da nikoli ne bi mogli natančno predvideti razvoja menjalnih tečajev v prihodnjem obdobju, tudi če bi lahko svoje cene prilagajali redno in v kratkih časovnih razmakih.
As regards the determination of profit, it should be noted that it was not possible to determine an amount for profit on the basis of the amounts incurred and realised by the two other exporting producers. Indeed, such computation results in an overall loss amount.
Glede določanja dobička je treba opozoriti, da zneska dobička ni bilo mogoče določiti na osnovi zneskov, nastalih in realiziranih s strani drugih dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, na ta način se lahko izračuna znesek izgube.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1139/2011
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1139/2011
Having regard to Council Decision 2011/729/CFSP of 10 November 2011 amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya [1],
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2011/729/SZVP z dne 10. novembra 2011 o spremembi Sklepa 2011/137/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih zaradi razmer v Libiji [1],
By Resolution 1973 (2011) of 17 March 2011, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided that a ban should be imposed on flights in the airspace of Libya.
Varnostni svet Združenih narodov (VSZN) je 17. marca 2011 sprejel Resolucijo 1973 (2011), s katero je prepovedal lete v zračnem prostoru Libije.
In application of Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP [2], that ban was given effect in the European Union by Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 of 2 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya [3].
Pri uporabi Sklepa Sveta 2011/137/SZVP [2] je bila ta prepoved v Evropski uniji uveljavljena z Uredbo (EU) št. 204/2011 z dne 2. marca 2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih glede na razmere v Libiji [3].
By Resolution 2016 (2011) of 27 October 2011, the UNSC decided that the ban should be terminated.
VSZN je v Resoluciji 2016 (2011) z dne 27. oktobra 2011 odločil, da bi morala prepoved prenehati veljati.
Following Decision 2011/729/CFSP, the provision of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 imposing the ban on flights should therefore be repealed,
V skladu s Sklepom 2011/729/SZVP bi bilo zato treba razveljaviti določbo iz Uredbe (EU) št. 204/2011 o prepovedi letov –
Article 4b of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 is hereby deleted.
Člen 4b Uredbe (EU) št. 204/2011 se črta.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ L 58.
UL L 58, 3.3.2011, str. 1.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1140/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1140/2011
establishing a prohibition of fishing for forkbeards in EU and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain
o prepovedi ribolova na tabinje v vodah EU in mednarodnih vodah con V, VI in VII s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Španije
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1141/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1141/2011
amending Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security as regards the use of security scanners at EU airports
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 272/2009 o dopolnitvi skupnih osnovnih standardov na področju varovanja v civilnem letalstvu v zvezi z uporabo varnostnih skenerjev na letališčih EU
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 [1] and in particular Article 4 and the Annex.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2008 o skupnih pravilih na področju varovanja civilnega letalstva in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002 [1] ter zlasti člena 4 in Priloge,
In accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008, the Commission is required to adopt general measures designed to amend non-essential elements of the common basic standards laid down in the Annex to that Regulation by supplementing them.
V skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 mora Komisija sprejeti splošne ukrepe, namenjene spreminjanju nebistvenih določb skupnih osnovnih standardov iz Priloge k navedeni uredbi, tako da jih dopolni.
Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 further provides that the Commission must adopt detailed measures for implementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security laid down in the Annex to that Regulation, as supplemented by the general measures adopted by the Commission on the basis of Article 4(2).
Člen 4(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 300/2008 nadalje določa, da mora Komisija sprejeti podrobne ukrepe za izvajanje skupnih osnovnih standardov na področju varovanja v civilnem letalstvu iz Priloge k navedeni uredbi, kakor jih dopolnjujejo splošni ukrepi, ki jih je Komisija sprejela na podlagi člena 4(2).
In particular, Commission Regulation (EC) No 272/2009 [2] supplementing the common basic standards on civil aviation security provides for general measures in respect of methods of screening allowed for passengers as laid down in Part A of its Annex.
Zlasti Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 272/2009 [2] o dopolnitvi skupnih osnovnih standardov na področju varovanja v civilnem letalstvu določa splošne ukrepe glede dovoljenih metod varnostnih pregledov potnikov, določenih v delu A Priloge k tej uredbi.
Security scanners are an effective method for passenger screening and should be authorised for use at EU airports by adding them to the list of allowed methods of screening.
Varnostni skenerji so učinkovita metoda za pregledovanje potnikov; treba bi jih bilo vključiti na seznam dovoljenih metod varnostnih pregledov in tako odobriti za uporabo na letališčih EU.
The Commission has requested its Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) to assess the possible effects of security scanners which use ionising radiation to human health.
Komisija je Znanstveni odbor za nastajajoča in na novo ugotovljena zdravstvena tveganja (SCENIHR) zaprosila, da oceni morebitne posledice za zdravje ljudi, ki bi jih lahko povzročilo ionizirajoče sevanje varnostnih skenerjev.