natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, the net amount resulting from the application of the voluntary modulation in Portugal fixed by Commission Decision 2009/780/EC [3] should for those years be added to the national ceiling for Portugal as set out in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 73/2009.
Zato je treba za ta leta neto znesek, ki izhaja iz uporabe prostovoljne modulacije na Portugalskem in je določen z Odločbo Komisije 2009/780/ES [3], v skladu s členom 8(2)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 dodati k nacionalnim zgornjim mejam za Portugalsko, kot so določene v Prilogi IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 73/2009.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 361/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 361/2010
amending Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 recognising protected zones exposed to particular plant health risks in the Community
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 690/2008 o priznavanju varovanih območij v Skupnosti, izpostavljenih posebni nevarnosti za zdravstveno varstvo rastlin
In some cases recognition was granted for a limited time to allow the Member State concerned to provide the full information necessary to show that the harmful organism in question was not present in the Member State or area concerned or to complete the efforts to eradicate the organism in question.
V nekaterih primerih je bilo priznanje časovno omejeno, da so zadevne države članice lahko predložile vse potrebne informacije, iz katerih je razvidno, da zadevni škodljivi organizem ne obstaja v zadevni državi članici ali na zadevnem območju, ali dokončale ukrepe za izkoreninjenje zadevnega organizma.
The entire territory of Greece was recognised as a protected zone with respect to Dendroctonus micans Kugelan, Gilpinia hercyniae (Hartig), Gonipterus scutellatus Gyll., Ips amitinus Eichhof, Ips cembrae Heer and Ips duplicatus Sahlberg until 31 March 2010.
Celotno ozemlje Grčije je bilo priznano kot varovano območje glede Dendroctonus micans Kugelan, Gilpinia hercyniae (Hartig), Gonipterus scutellatus Gyll., Ips amitinus Eichhof, Ips cembrae Heer in Ips duplicatus Sahlberg do 31. marca 2010.
In 2009 Greece conducted surveys and notified results to the Commission in accordance with the third and fifth subparagraph of Article 2(1)(h) of Directive 2000/29/EC.
Leta 2009 je Grčija opravila raziskave in v skladu s tretjim in petim pododstavkom člena 2(1)(h) Direktive 2000/29/ES Komisiji sporočila ugotovitve.
However, those results were not complete.
Vendar navedene ugotovitve niso bile popolne.
A visit by Commission experts from 2 to 10 February 2010 confirmed that Greece had made significant progress with regard to organising and conducting those surveys and with regard to notifying the results thereof.
Obisk strokovnjakov Komisije od 2. do 10. februarja 2010 je potrdil, da je Grčija glede organizacije in izvedbe navedenih raziskav ter glede sporočanja njihovih ugotovitev znatno napredovala.
In view of the fact that the results notified were not complete, the experts concluded that further progress would be necessary.
Glede na dejstvo, da sporočene ugotovitve niso bile popolne, so strokovnjaki sklenili, da je potreben nadaljnji napredek.
According to the results of the surveys there were no findings of the organisms concerned in Greece.
V skladu z ugotovitvami raziskav zadevni organizmi v Grčiji niso bili ugotovljeni.
Taking into account those results and the outcome of the visit of the Commission experts in Greece, it is appropriate to continue to recognise Greece as a protected zone with respect to those organisms for one more year, in order to give Greece the time necessary to submit information confirming that those organisms are not present on its territory.
Ob upoštevanju navedenih ugotovitev in izidov obiska strokovnjakov Komisije v Grčiji je primerno Grčijo priznati kot varovano območje glede navedenih organizmov še za eno leto, da bo imela dovolj časa za predložitev informacij in potrditev, da navedeni organizmi na njenem ozemlju niso prisotni.
Ireland, Lithuania and certain regions and parts of regions in Italy, Slovakia and Slovenia were recognised as protected zones with respect to Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Irska, Litva in nekatere regije in deli regij v Italiji, na Slovaškem in v Sloveniji so bili priznani kot varovana območja glede škodljivega organizma Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Winsl. et al. is not present or, where necessary, to complete their efforts to eradicate that organism.
Winsl. et al. ni prisoten, ali po potrebi za dokončanje ukrepov za izkoreninjenje navedenega organizma.
In the second column of points 4, 5 and 7 to 10 of heading (a), after the word ‘Greece,’ the words ‘(until 31 March 2010)’ are replaced by ‘(until 31 March 2011)’.
V drugem stolpcu točk 4, 5, 7 do 10 naslova (a) se besede „(do 31. marca 2010)“ za besedo „Grčija“ nadomestijo z „(do 31. marca 2011)“.
In the second column of point 2 of heading (b), in the second indent the words ‘until 31 March 2010’ are replaced by ‘until 31 March 2012’.
V drugem stolpcu točke 2 naslova (b) se besede „do 31. marca 2010“ v drugi alinei nadomestijo z „do 31. marca 2012.“
Winsl. et al. until 31 March 2010.
Winsl. et al. do 31. marca 2010.
From the information received from those Member States on the results of surveys and from the reports by the Commission experts who visited Italy, Lithuania, Slovakia and Slovenia in 2009, it appears that those protected zones should be recognised for two more years to give those Member States the time necessary to submit information showing that Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Iz informacij, prejetih iz navedenih držav članic o ugotovitvah raziskav, in iz poročil strokovnjakov Komisije, ki so v letu 2009 obiskali Italijo, Litvo, Slovaško in Slovenijo, je razvidno, da je treba navedena območja kot varovana priznavati še dve leti, da bodo imele navedene države članice na voljo dovolj časa za predložitev informacij o tem, da Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 362/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 362/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 April 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 28. aprila 2010.
Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 363/2010
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 363/2010
amending Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating, inter alia, in Malaysia
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1001/2008 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterega železnega ali jeklenega pribora (fitingov) za cevi s poreklom, med drugim, iz Malezije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(4) Uredbe,
In October 2008, definitive anti-dumping measures were reimposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 [2] on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings (‘TPFs’ or the ‘product concerned’) originating, inter alia, in Malaysia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
(1) Oktobra 2008 so bili z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1001/2008 [2] ponovno uvedeni dokončni protidampinški ukrepi na uvoz nekaterega pribora (fitingov) za cevi („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Malezije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The anti-dumping duties in force for Malaysia are 59,2 % for Anggerik Laksana Sdn Bhd and 75 % for all other companies.
Veljavne protidampinške dajatve za Malezijo znašajo 59,2 % za družbo Anggerik Laksana Sdn Bhd in 75 % za ostale družbe.
The Commission has received an application to initiate a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda glede „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The application was lodged by Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd (the applicant), an exporting producer in Malaysia (the country concerned).
Zahtevek je vložila družba Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd („vložnik“), ki je proizvajalec izvoznik v Maleziji („zadevna država“).
The applicant alleged that it did not export the product concerned to the Union during the period of investigation on which the anti-dumping measures were based, i.e. the period from 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2001 (the original investigation period) and that it is not related to any of the exporting producers of the product concerned which are subject to the anti-dumping measures described in recital 1.
Vložnik je trdil, da med obdobjem preiskave, to je od 1. aprila 2000 do 31. marca 2001 („obdobje prvotne preiskave“), na katerem so temeljili protidampinški ukrepi, ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka v Unijo in da ni povezan z nobenimi proizvajalci izvozniki zadevnega izdelka, za katere veljajo protidampinški ukrepi iz uvodne izjave 1.
The applicant further alleged that it had entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export the product concerned to the Union in the near future.
Vložnik je tudi trdil, da se je s pogodbo nepreklicno zavezal, da bo v bližnji prihodnosti v Unijo izvažal zadevni izdelek.
The Commission examined the prima facie evidence submitted by the applicant and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je preučila prima facie dokaze, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in ocenila, da zadostujejo za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee, and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated, by Regulation (EC) No 692/2009 [3], a review of Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 with regard to the applicant.
Po tem, ko se je Komisija posvetovala s Svetovalnim odborom in zadevni industriji Unije dala možnost za pripombe, je z Uredbo (ES) št. 692/2009 [3] začela pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1001/2008 v zvezi z vložnikom.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 692/2009, the anti-dumping duty of 75 % imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008 was repealed with regard to imports of the product concerned produced and sold for exports to the Union by the applicant.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 692/2009 je bila protidampinška dajatev v višini 75 %, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1001/2008, razveljavljena za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je vložnik proizvajal in prodajal za izvoz v Unijo.
Regulation (EC) No 692/2009 determined that if the investigation showed that the applicant fulfilled the requirements to have an individual duty established, it may be necessary to amend the rate of duty currently applicable to imports of the product concerned from companies not individually mentioned in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1001/2008.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 692/2009 je bilo določeno, da bo morda treba prilagoditi trenutno veljavno stopnjo dajatve za uvoz zadevnega izdelka od družb, ki niso posamično navedene v členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1001/2008, če preiskava pokaže vložnikovo izpolnjevanje zahtev za določitev individualne dajatve.
The product under review is tube and pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, originating in Malaysia (the product concerned), currently falling within CN codes ex73079311, ex73079319, ex73079930 and ex73079990.
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je pribor (fitingi) za cevi (brez litih fitingov, prirobnic in fitingov z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla), katerega največji zunanji premer ne presega 609,6 mm, vrste, ki se uporablja za soležno varjenje ali druge namene, s poreklom iz Malezije („zadevni izdelek“), trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73079311, ex73079319, ex73079930 in ex73079990.
The Defence Committee of the steel butt-welding fittings industry of the European Union representing the Union industry (the Union industry) made its views know in writing to the Commission services.
Odbor za zaščito interesov industrije fitingov iz jekla za čelno varjenje Evropske unije, ki predstavlja industrijo Unije („industrija Unije“), je svoje stališče pisno izrazil službam Komisije.
The Defence Committee challenged the reliability of the basis for the export price.
Odbor za zaščito je izrazil dvome o zanesljivosti podlage za izvozno ceno.
Documents were also provided allegedly showing attempts to circumvent the measures and information was given about the level of price of the product concerned available for EU importers.
Predloženi so bili tudi dokumenti, ki domnevno dokazujejo poskuse izogibanja ukrepom, ter informacije o ravni cene za zadevni izdelek, ki je na voljo uvoznikom EU.
The Commission sent an anti-dumping questionnaire to the applicant and its related companies and received a reply within the deadline set for that purpose.
Komisija je vložniku in njegovim povezanim družbam poslala protidampinške vprašalnike in odgovore prejela v roku, določenem v ta namen.
The Commission also sent anti-dumping questionnaires to unrelated importers located in the European Union but no cooperation was obtained.
Komisija je prav tako poslala vprašalnike nepovezanim uvoznikom iz Evropske unije, vendar sodelovanja ni bilo.
The Commission sought to verify all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of the new exporter status and dumping, and verification visits were carried out at the premises of the applicant and a related company in Malaysia:
Komisija si je prizadevala za preveritev vseh informacij, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev statusa novega izvoznika in dampinga, opravljeni pa so bili tudi preveritveni obiski v prostorih vložnika in povezani družbi v Maleziji:
Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd (the applicant),
Pantech Steel Industries Sdn Bhd (vložnik),
Pantech Corporation Sdn Bhd (related trading company).
Pantech Corporation Sdn Bhd (povezana trgovska družba).
The review investigation period of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009 (‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2008 do 30. junija 2009 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The investigation confirmed that the company had not exported the product concerned during the original period of investigation and that it had started to export to the European Union after this period.
S preiskavo je bilo potrjeno, da družba v obdobju prvotne preiskave ni izvažala zadevnega izdelka in da ga je v Evropsko unijo začela izvažati po tem obdobju.
The company entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export during the RIP.
Družba se je s pogodbo nepreklicno zavezala, da bo izvažala med OPP.
This took the form of three orders from the same importing group in the EU.
Ta zaveza je vsebovala tri naročila iste uvozne skupine v EU.
These orders were, after the RIP, completed by export transactions under approximately the same conditions with negligible differences in price and quantities.
Ta naročila so bila po OPP opravljena z izvoznimi transakcijami pod približno istimi pogoji, vendar z zanemarljivimi razlikami v ceni in količinah.
While the quantities involved were limited, they were nevertheless found sufficient to establish a reliable dumping margin.
Kljub temu, da so bile zadevne količine omejene, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zadostovale za določitev zanesljive stopnje dampinga.
This is because the levels of prices charged were further supported by other information at the Commission services’ disposal, including export prices of the exporter concerned to third countries, which confirmed the pattern of behaviour found in the transactions under scrutiny.
Razlog je v tem, da so zaračunane ravni cen nadalje podprle druge informacije, ki so na voljo službam Komisije in vključujejo informacije o izvoznih cenah zadevnega izvoznika za tretje države in so potrdile vzorec obnašanja, ugotovljen pri pregledanih transakcijah.
As concerns the other conditions for the recognition of a new exporter status, the company was able to demonstrate that it did not have any links, direct or indirect, with any of the Malaysian exporting producers subject to the anti-dumping measures in force with regard to the product concerned.
Glede ostalih pogojev za priznanje statusa novega izvoznika je družba lahko dokazala, da ni neposredno ali posredno povezana z nobenim malezijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katerega se v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom uporabljajo veljavni protidampinški ukrepi.
Accordingly, it is confirmed that the company should be considered a ‘new exporter’ in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, and thus an individual margin should be determined for it.
Zato se potrdi, da je treba družbo šteti za „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe in ji zato določiti individualno stopnjo dajatve.
The applicant produces the fittings and sells the product concerned domestically and on export markets.
Vložnik proizvaja fitinge in zadevni izdelek prodaja na domačem in izvoznem trgu.
The investigation revealed a complex sales organisation on the domestic market involving unrelated distributors and related trading companies, whereby unrelated distributors purchase the product concerned from the producer and then resell it to the related traders that then sell the goods onwards to unrelated customers on the domestic market.
Preiskava je pokazala zapleteno organizacijo prodaje na domačem trgu, ki vključuje nepovezane distributerje in povezane trgovske družbe, pri čemer nepovezani distributerji kupujejo zadevni izdelek od proizvajalca in ga nato preprodajo povezanim trgovcem, ki blago prodajo naprej nepovezanim strankam na domačem trgu.
De facto, the unrelated distributors act as agents for the applicant.
Dejansko imajo nepovezani distributerji pri vložniku vlogo posrednika.
Based on the above, and taking into account the fact that the sales of the related trading companies can be linked back to the applicant, the prices charged to the final consumer by these related trading companies are considered as the first price in the ordinary course of trade and therefore form the basis for the normal value determination.
Na podlagi navedenega in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je prodaja povezanih trgovskih družb lahko povezana z vložnikom, se cene, ki jih te povezane trgovske družbe zaračunajo končnemu potrošniku, štejejo kot prva cena pri običajnem poteku trgovine ter so zato podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales were considered representative when the total domestic sales volume was at least 5 % of the total export sales volume to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se domača prodaja šteje za reprezentativno, če predstavlja celotni obseg domače prodaje vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza v Unijo.
The Commission established that tube and pipe fittings were sold domestically by the applicant in overall representative volumes.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je vložnik prodajal pribor (fitinge) za cevi na domačem trgu v celotnem reprezentativnem obsegu.
The Commission then identified those product types of tube and pipe fittings sold domestically by the trading companies which were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the European Union.
Komisija je nato ugotovila, da so vrste izdelkov pribora (fitingov) za cevi, ki so jih trgovske družbe prodajale na domačem trgu, povsem enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, ki se prodajajo za izvoz v Evropsko unijo.
An examination was also made by the Commission as to whether the sales of tube and pipe fittings sold domestically in representative quantities could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prav tako preučila, ali je mogoče za domačo prodajo pribora (fitingov) za cevi v reprezentativnih količinah šteti, da se je izvajala v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers.
To je bilo opravljeno tako, da je bil ugotovljen delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam.
As it was found that there were sufficient sales in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil v običajnem poteku trgovine dosežen zadosten obseg prodaje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.
In the few cases where the type of product concerned was not sold on the domestic market during the RIP, the normal value was constructed by adding to the exporter’s manufacturing costs of the exported types, a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable profit margin.
V redkih primerih, v katerih se vrsta zadevnega izdelka ni prodajala na domačem trgu med OPP, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da so bili stroškom proizvodnje izvoznika za izvožene vrste prišteti razumen znesek za prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške (PSA) ter razumna stopnja dobička.
The product concerned was exported directly to independent customers in the Union.
Zadevni izdelek je bil izvožen neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
Therefore, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable as referred to in recital 16.
Zato je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, to je na podlagi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih izvoznih cen, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 16.
The normal value and the export prices were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozne cene so se primerjale na podlagi cene franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between normal value and export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevajo razlike, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen.
Adjustments for insurance, handling, loading and ancillary expenses, and credit costs were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by verified evidence.
Prilagoditve za stroške zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške, stroškov natovarjanja in druge dodatne stroške ter posojila so bile odobrene v vseh primerih, ko je bilo ugotovljeno, da so smiselne, točne in podprte s preverjenimi dokazi.
The applicant claimed that if the Commission would use the normal value based on the domestic sales of the related trading companies, an adjustment for differences in level of trade should be granted between the domestic market and the EU market.
Vložnik je trdil, da je treba odobriti prilagoditev za razlike na ravni trgovine med domačim trgom in trgom EU, če Komisija uporabi normalno vrednost na podlagi domače prodaje povezanih trgovskih družb.
It further argued that sales to the EU market were done at distributor level whereas, in the domestic market, the applicant used to sell an important part of the tube and pipe fittings as part of larger consignments in oil and gas project markets where fittings often play an ancillary role only to that of the main pipes, valves and other major components, and that this market was at a different level of trade.
Poleg tega je trdil, da se je prodaja na trgu EU izvajala na ravni distributerjev, na domačem trgu pa je vložnik običajno prodajal znaten del pribora (fitingov) za cevi kot del večjih pošiljk na trgu naftnih in plinskih projektov, pri katerih so fitingi pogosto samo dodatki glavnim cevem, ventilom in drugim večjim sestavnim delom, ter da je bila na tem trgu drugačna raven trgovine.