natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Analytical methods [1]Determination of sorbic acid and thymol in feed: reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography method equipped with ultraviolet/diode array detection (RP-HPLC-UV/DAD).
Analitske metode [1]Določanje sorbinske kisline in timola v krmi: metoda tekočinske kromatografije visoke ločljivosti z reverzno fazo z ultravijoličnim detektorjem/detektorjem s serijo diod (RP-HPLC-UV/DAD).
Determination of citric acid in the additive and premixtures: (RP-HPLC-UV/DAD).
Določanje citronske kisline v dodatku in premiksih: (RP-HPLC-UV/DAD).
Determination of citric acid in feedingstuff: enzymatic determination of citric content-NADH (reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) spectrometric method.
Določanje citronske kisline v krmi: spektrometrična metoda encimskega določanja vsebnosti citronske kisline NADH (reducirana oblika nikotinamid adenin dinukleotida).
For piglets (weaned) up to 35 kg.
Za pujske (odstavljene) do 35 kg.
For safety: breathing protection, glasses and gloves shall be used during handling.
Zaradi varnosti je treba pri ravnanju uporabljati zaščito za dihala, zaščitna očala in rokavice.
23 December 2020
december 2020
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1118/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1118/2010
concerning the authorisation of diclazuril as a feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of authorisation Janssen Pharmaceutica NV) and amending Regulation (EC) No 2430/1999
o izdaji dovoljenja za diklazuril kot krmni dodatek za piščance za pitanje (imetnik dovoljenja Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V.) ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2430/1999
Diclazuril, CAS No 101831-37-2, was authorised for 10 years in accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC as a feed additive for use on chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying up to 16 weeks and turkeys up to 12 weeks by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2430/1999 [3].
Diklazuril, številka CAS 101831-37-2, je bil v skladu z Direktivo 70/524/EGS za deset let odobren kot krmni dodatek za piščance za pitanje, piščance za nesnice do 16 tednov in purane do 12 tednov z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2430/1999 [3].
In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 in conjunction with Article 7 of that Regulation, an application was submitted for the re-evaluation of diclazuril as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, requesting that additive to be classified in the additive category ‘coccidiostats and histomonostats’.
V skladu s členom 10(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 in v povezavi s členom 7 navedene uredbe je bil predložen zahtevek za ponovno oceno diklazurila kot krmnega dodatka za piščance za pitanje in za uvrstitev navedenega dodatka v kategorijo dodatkov „kokcidiostatiki in sredstva proti histomonijazi“.
The application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.
Zahtevku so bili priloženi podatki in dokumenti, zahtevani s členom 7(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003.
The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 23 June 2010 that, under the proposed conditions of use, diclazuril does not have an adverse effect on animal health, consumer health or the environment, and that that additive is effective in controlling coccidiosis in chickens for fattening [4].
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“) je v mnenju z dne 23. junija 2010 navedla, da diklazuril v predlaganih pogojih uporabe nima škodljivega vpliva na zdravje živali in potrošnikov ali okolje ter da je navedeni dodatek učinkovit pri nadzoru kokcidioze pri piščancih za pitanje [4].
It concluded that no safety concerns would arise provided that appropriate protective measures are taken.
Navedla je, da ob sprejetih ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepih ne bo varnostnih tveganj.
The assessment of diclazuril shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied.
Ocena diklazurila je pokazala, da so pogoji za dovoljenje iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 izpolnjeni.
As a consequence of the granting of a new authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, the provisions on diclazuril for chickens for fattening in Regulation (EC) No 2430/1999 should be deleted.
Zaradi izdaje novega dovoljenja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1831/2003 je treba črtati določbe o diklazurilu za piščance za pitanje iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2430/1999.
Since the modifications on the conditions of the authorisation are not related to safety reasons, it is appropriate to allow a transitional period for the disposal of existing stocks of the premixtures and compound feed.
Ker spremembe pogojev za izdajo dovoljenja niso povezane z varnostnimi razlogi, je primerno, da se omogoči prehodno obdobje za odstranitev obstoječih zalog premiksov in krmnih mešanic.
The preparation specified in the Annex, belonging to the additive category ‘coccidiostats and histomonostats’ is authorised as an additive in animal nutrition subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Pripravek, ki je opredeljen v tej prilogi in spada v kategorijo dodatkov „kokcidiostatiki in sredstva proti histomonijazi“, se dovoli kot dodatek v prehrani živali v skladu s pogoji iz navedene priloge.
In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2430/1999, the entry under the registration number of additive E 771, concerning diclazuril for chickens for fattening, is deleted.
V Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 2430/1999 se vnos pod registrsko številko dodatka E 771 v zvezi z diklazurilom za piščance za pitanje črta.
Premixtures and compound feed containing diclazuril labelled in accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC may continue to be placed on the market and used until stocks are exhausted.
Premiksi in krmne mešanice, ki vsebujejo diklazuril, označen v skladu z Direktivo 70/524/EGS, se lahko še naprej dajejo v promet in uporabljajo do porabe zalog.
Protein-poor soybean meal: 99,25 g/100 g
sojina moka z malo beljakovinami: 99,25 g/100 g
Polyvidone K 30: 0,20 g/100 g
polividon K 30: 0,20 g/100 g
Sodium hydroxide: 0,05 g/100 g
natrijev hidroksid: 0,05 g/100 g
(±)-4-chlorophenyl[2,6-dichloro4-
(±)-4-klorofenil[2,6-dikloro4-
(2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3,5-dioxo-1,2,4-triazin-2-yl)phenyl]acetonitrile,
(2,3,4,5-tetrahidro-3,5-diokso-1,2,4-triazin-2-il)fenil]acetonitril,
Degradation compound (R064318): ≤ 0,1 %
produkt razgradnje (R064318): ≤ 0,1 %
Other related impurities (T001434, R066891, R068610, R070156, R070016):
druge povezane nečistoče (T001434, R066891, R068610, R070156, R070016):
≤ 0,5 % individually
≤ 0,5 % posamezno
Analytical method [1]For determination of diclazuril in feed: reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using Ultraviolet detection at 280nm (Regulation (EC) No 152/2009)
Analitska metoda: [1]Za določanje diklazurila v krmi: tekočinska kromatografija visoke ločljivosti (HPLC) z reverzno fazo z ultravijoličnim določanjem pri 280 nm (Uredba (ES) št. 152/2009)
For determination of diclazuril in poultry tissues: HPLC coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS/MS) using one precursor ion and two product ions.
Za določanje diklazurila v perutninskem tkivu: HPLC v povezavi z masnim spektrometrom geometrije trojni kvadrupol (MS/MS) z uporabo enega prekurzorskega iona in dveh produktnih ionov.
Diclazuril shall not be mixed with other coccidiostats.
Diklazuril se ne meša z drugimi kokcidiostatiki.
500 μg diclazuril/kg of wet skin/fat
500 μg diklazurila/kg mokre kože/maščobe
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1119/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1119/2010
concerning the authorisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 as a feed additive for dairy cows and horses and amending Regulation (EC) No 1520/2007 (holder of the authorisation Prosol SpA)
o izdaji dovoljenja za Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 kot krmni dodatek za krave molznice in konje ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1520/2007 (imetnik dovoljenja Prosol SpA)
The preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 was authorised as a feed additive for 10 years for use on sows by Commission Regulation (EC) 896/2009 [3].
Pripravek Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 je bil z Uredbo Komisije (ES) 896/2009 [3] za deset let dovoljen kot krmni dodatek za svinje.
In accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC, it was authorised without a time limit for use on weaned piglets by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1200/2005 [4], on cattle for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 492/2006 [5] and on dairy cows by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2007 [6].
V skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 70/524/EGS je bil pripravek z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1200/2005 [4] brez časovne omejitve dovoljen za odstavljene pujske, z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 492/2006 [5] za govedo za pitanje in z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1520/2007 [6] za krave molznice.
That additive was subsequently entered in the Community Register of feed additives as an existing product, in accordance with Article 10(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.
Navedeni dodatek je bil naknadno vpisan v register krmnih dodatkov Skupnosti kot obstoječ proizvod v skladu s členom 10(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003.
In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 in conjunction with Article 7 of that Regulation, an application was submitted for the re-evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 as a feed additive for dairy cows and, in accordance with Article 7 of that Regulation, for a new use on horses, requesting that additive to be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’.
V skladu s členom 10(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 in v povezavi s členom 7 navedene uredbe je bil predložen zahtevek za ponovno oceno Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 kot krmnega dodatka za krave molznice, v skladu s členom 7 navedene uredbe pa za novo uporabo za konje, da se navedeni dodatek uvrsti v kategorijo dodatkov „zootehnični dodatki“.
The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 22 June 2010 [7] concerning the use as a feed additive for dairy cows that, under the proposed conditions of use, Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 does not have an adverse effect on animal health, consumer health or the environment, and that it has a potential to increase milk production in dairy cows.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“) je v mnenju z dne 22. junija 2010 [7] navedla, da uporaba Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 kot krmnega dodatka za krave molznice v predlaganih pogojih uporabe nima škodljivega vpliva na zdravje živali in potrošnikov ali okolje ter da lahko poveča prirejo mleka pri kravah molznicah.
The Authority concluded in its opinion of 22 June 2010 [8] concerning the use as a feed additive for horses that the use of that preparation can improve the apparent fibre digestibility in the target species.
Agencija je v mnenju o uporabi navedenega pripravka kot krmnega dodatka za konje z dne 22. junija 2010 [8] navedla, da njegova uporaba lahko izboljša zaznavno prebavljivost vlaken pri ciljni živalski vrsti.
The assessment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied.
Ocena Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 je pokazala, da so pogoji za dovoljenje iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 izpolnjeni.
As a consequence of the granting of a new authorisation under Regulation (EC) 1831/2003, the provisions on Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 contained in Regulation (EC) No 1520/2007 should be deleted.
Zaradi izdaje novega dovoljenja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1831/2003 je treba črtati določbe o Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1520/2007.
In Regulation (EC) No 1520/2007, Article 1 and Annex I are deleted.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 1520/2007 se črtata člen 1 in Priloga I.
Premixtures and compound feed containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 labelled in accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC may continue to be placed on the market and used until stocks are exhausted.
Premiksi in krmne mešanice, ki vsebujejo Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885, označen v skladu z Direktivo 70/524/EGS, se lahko še naprej dajejo v promet in uporabljajo do porabe zalog.
Preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885 containing a minimum of 1 × 109 CFU/g
pripravek Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL Sc 39885 vsebuje najmanjšo vsebnost 1 × 109 CFU/g.
Viable cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885
žive celice Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885
Analytical methods [1]Enumeration: pour plate method using chloramphenicol glucose yeast extract agar
Analitske metode [1]metoda štetja: na politi plošči z uporabo agarja, pripravljenega iz ekstrakta kvasovk kloramfenikola.
Identification: polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method)
identifikacija: metoda verižne reakcije s polimerazo (PCR).
For safety: glasses and gloves shall be used during handling.
Zaradi varnosti je treba pri ravnanju uporabljati zaščitna očala in rokavice.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1120/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1120/2010
concerning the authorisation of Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M as a feed additive for weaned piglets (holder of the authorisation Lallemand SAS)
o izdaji dovoljenja za Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M kot krmni dodatek za odstavljene pujske (imetnik dovoljenja Lallemand SAS)
The application concerns the authorisation of Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M as a feed additive for weaned piglets, to be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’.
Zahtevek zadeva izdajo dovoljenja za Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M kot krmni dodatek za odstavljene pujske in njegovo uvrstitev v kategorijo dodatkov „zootehnični dodatki“.
The use of Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M has been authorised without a time limit for chickens for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1200/2005 [2], and for pigs for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2036/2005 [3], and for salmonids and shrimps by Commission Regulation (EC) No 911/2009 [4] for 10 years.
Uporaba Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M je bila brez časovne omejitve dovoljena za piščance za pitanje z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1200/2005 [2] in za prašiče za pitanje z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2036/2005 [3], za deset let pa za salmonide in kozice z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 911/2009 [4].
New data were submitted in support of the application for the authorisation of the preparation for weaned piglets.
Predloženi so bili novi podatki v podporo zahtevku za izdajo dovoljenja za pripravek, namenjen odstavljenim pujskom.
The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 23 June 2010 [5] that Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M, under the proposed conditions of use, does not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment, and that its use showed a significant improvement either in growth performance or in feed efficiency in the target species.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“) je v mnenju z dne 23. junija 2010 [5] navedla, da Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M v predlaganih pogojih uporabe nima škodljivega vpliva na zdravje živali in ljudi ali okolje ter da njegova uporaba precej izboljšuje rast ali učinkovitost krme ciljne živalske vrste.
The assessment of Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied.
Ocena Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M je pokazala, da so pogoji za dovoljenje iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 izpolnjeni.
Preparation of Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M containing a minimum of 1 × 1010 CFU/g
pripravek Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M z vsebnostjo najmanj 1 × 1010 CFU/g dodatka
Viable cells of Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5 M
žive celice Pediococcus acidilactici CNCM MA 18/5M
Analytical methods [1]Enumeration: spread plate method using MRS agar (EN 15786:2009)
Analitske metode [1]metoda štetja: na razliti plošči z uporabo agarja MRS (EN 15786:2009)
Identification: Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)
identifikacija: gelska elektroforeza v utripajočem polju (PFGE)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1121/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1121/2010
entering a designation in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Edam Holland (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Edam Holland (ZGO))
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 7(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila [1] ter zlasti tretjega pododstavka člena 7(5) Uredbe,
In accordance with the first paragraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and pursuant to Article 17(2) of the same Regulation, the application of the Netherlands to enter the designation ‘Edam Holland’ in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim odstavkom člena 6(2) in členom 17(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Nizozemske za vpis imena „Edam Holland“ v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The objections were deemed admissible under Article 7(3) of that Regulation, except the objections of Australia and of Dairy Australia, which were deemed inadmissible due to their late arrival.
Ugovori so se na podlagi člena 7(3) navedene uredbe šteli za sprejemljive, razen ugovorov Avstralije in organizacije Dairy Australia, ki zaradi pozne vložitve nista bila sprejemljiva.
Statements of objection concerned non-compliance with the conditions laid down in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, in particular the name and its use, specificity and reputation of the product, delimitation of geographical area as well as restrictions on the origin of raw materials.
Izjave o ugovoru so se nanašale na neizpolnjevanje pogojev iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, zlasti glede imena in njegove uporabe, posebnosti in slovesa proizvoda, opredelitve geografskega območja in omejitev v zvezi s poreklom surovin.
The objections also claimed that registration would be contrary to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, would jeopardise the existence of names, trademarks or products which had been legally on the market for at least five years preceding the date of the publication provided for in Article 6(2) and that the name proposed for registration is generic.
V ugovorih je bilo še navedeno, da bi bila registracija v nasprotju s členom 3(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, da bi ogrozila obstoj imen, blagovnih znamk ali proizvodov, ki so bili zakonito na trgu vsaj pet let pred datumom objave iz člena 6(2), ter da je ime, predlagano za registracijo, generično.
By letters dated 21 October 2008, the Commission asked the Netherlands and the objectors to seek agreement among themselves in accordance with their internal procedures.
Komisija je v dopisih z dne 21. oktobra 2008 Nizozemsko in vlagatelje ugovorov pozvala, naj se med seboj dogovorijo v skladu z njihovimi notranjimi postopki.
Given that no agreement with the objectors was reached within the designated time limit, the Commission should adopt a decision in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Ker vlagatelji ugovorov v predvidenem roku niso dosegli nobenega sporazuma, mora Komisija sprejeti sklep v skladu s postopkom iz člena 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
Concerning the alleged failure of compliance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 in respect of the name, geographical area, specificity of the product, link between the product characteristics and the geographical area, reputation and restrictions concerning the origin of raw material, the national authorities responsible provided confirmation that these elements were present and in addition no manifest error was identified.
Kar zadeva domnevno neizpolnjevanje člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 glede imena, geografskega območja, posebnosti proizvoda, povezave med lastnostmi proizvoda in geografskim območjem, slovesa in omejitev v zvezi s poreklom surovin, so pristojni nacionalni organi potrdili prisotnost teh elementov, poleg tega pa ni bila ugotovljena nobena očitna napaka.
It should be pointed out that ‘Holland’ is not the name of the Member State concerned, and that ‘Edam Holland’ is considered a traditional geographical name encompassed by Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Treba je poudariti, da „Holland“ ni ime zadevne države članice in da se „Edam Holland“ šteje za tradicionalno geografsko ime, zajeto s členom 2(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
The requirements of Article 2(1), point b) of the said Regulation are in this connection fulfilled since the related geographical area is delimited accordingly to the link and the main elements of the product specificity.
V zvezi s tem so izpolnjene zahteve člena 2(1)(b) navedene uredbe, saj je zadevno geografsko območje opredeljeno glede na povezavo in glavne elemente posebnosti proizvoda.
The specificity of Edam Holland is due to a combination of factors linked to the geographical area: such as the quality of milk (high fat level and protein content), amino acids originating from β-CN and γ-glutamyl peptide, prevalence of grazing on meadows, use of calf rennet, natural ripening, as well as the skills of the farmers and cheese producers.
Posebnost sira Edam Holland je povezana z več dejavniki v zvezi z geografskim območjem, kot so kakovost mleka (visoka raven maščob in vsebnost beljakovin), aminokisline iz β-CN in γ-glutamil peptidov ter pretežna paša na travnikih, uporaba sirila iz telet, naravno zorenje ter veščine kmetov in proizvajalcev sira.
As regards objections based on non compliance with Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Netherlands submitted information regarding the distinction between the product bearing the registered name ‘Noord-Hollandse Edammer’ and that for which the name ‘Edam Holland’ is applied.
Kar zadeva ugovore zaradi neizpolnjevanja člena 3(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006, je Nizozemska predložila informacije v zvezi z razlikovanjem med proizvodom z registriranim imenom „Noord-Hollandse Edammer“ in proizvodom, za katerega se uporablja ime „Edam Holland“.
No evidence was provided in the statement of objections that consumers would be liable to be misled or that the producers would be treated in an inequitable manner.
V izjavi o ugovoru ni bil naveden noben dokaz o morebitnem zavajanju potrošnikov ali neenakovredni obravnavi proizvajalcev.
It appears that the objectors did not refer to the entire name ‘Edam Holland’ when claiming that registration would jeopardize the existence of names, trademarks or products and that the name proposed for registration is generic, but only to one element of it, namely ‘Edam’.
Zdi se, da vlagatelji ugovorov, ko so trdili, da bi registracija ogrozila obstoj imen, blagovnih znamk ali proizvodov in da je ime, predlagano za registracijo, generično, niso upoštevali celotnega imena „Edam Holland“, ampak le njegov del, tj. „Edam“.
However, protection is granted to the term ‘Edam Holland’ as a whole.
Vendar se zaščita dodeli za izraz „Edam Holland“ kot celoto.
Pursuant to the second sub-paragraph of Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the term ‘Edam’ may continue to be used provided the principles and rules applicable in the Union’s legal order are respected.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 13(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 se lahko izraz „Edam“ še naprej uporablja, če se upoštevajo veljavna načela in pravila iz pravnega reda Unije.
For the sake of clarification, the specification and the summary have been modified accordingly.
Zaradi večje jasnosti sta bila specifikacija in povzetek ustrezno spremenjena.
In the light of the above, the name ‘Edam Holland’ should be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’.
Glede na to je treba ime „Edam Holland“ vpisati v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb“.