natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The imposition of measures will restore the import price to non-injurious levels, allowing the Union industry to compete under fair trade circumstances.
Uvedba ukrepov bo uvozno ceno dvignila na neškodljivo raven, kar bo industriji Unije omogočilo, da bo konkurirala po poštenih tržnih pogojih.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that imposing measures would clearly be in the interest of the Union industry.
Zato se začasno sklene, da bi bila uvedba ukrepov očitno v interesu industrije Unije.
The likely impact of measures on importers has been considered in accordance with Article 21 (2) of the basic Regulation.
Verjeten vpliv ukrepov na uvoznike je bil obravnavan v skladu s členom 21(2) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect it is noted that the unrelated importers that made themselves known were also users.
V zvezi s tem je treba opomniti, da so bili nepovezani uvozniki, ki so se javili, tudi uporabniki.
Thus the analysis referring to them is presented under the relevant section on interest of users.
Zato je z njimi povezana analiza predstavljena v zadevnem razdelku o interesu uporabnikov.
No representations were received from consumers’ organisations following the publication of the notice of initiation of this proceeding.
Združenja potrošnikov po objavi obvestila o začetku tega postopka niso predložila svojih stališč.
Therefore, the analysis has been limited to the effect of measures on users.
Zato je bila analiza omejena na vpliv ukrepov na uporabnike.
Questionnaires were sent to 8 known users.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani 8 znanim uporabnikom.
However, meaningful comments were received from only two of them.
Vendar pa sta le dva poslala smiselne pripombe.
Therefore, the Union interest analysis is based on the responses of two rather large users, which together represent almost 40 % of Union consumption.
Zato analiza interesa Unije temelji na odgovorih dveh precej velikih uporabnikov, ki skupaj predstavljata skoraj 40 % potrošnje Unije.
The two co-operating Union users represent major players in the Union laundry detergent and water softener industry.
Oba sodelujoča uporabnika Unije sta pomembna akterja v industriji detergentov za perilo in mehčalcev za vodo v Uniji.
They both objected to the imposition of measures.
Oba sta ugovarjala uvedbi ukrepov.
The investigation established that with respect to the co-operating Union users’ consumption less than 1/3 of it is imported from the Bosnian exporting producer.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se v zvezi s potrošnjo sodelujočih porabnikov Unije manj kot tretjina uvozi od bosanskega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The remaining part is covered by procurements from the Union producers which remain the prime supply source of the co-operating users.
Preostanek se krije z nabavami od proizvajalcev Unije, ki so še vedno glavni vir dobave za sodelujoča uporabnika.
Account taken of the low capacity utilisation rate of the Union producers, as explained above at recitals (47) and (48), it is clear that any imposition of measures is not expected to lead to any shortages in supply or consequent increase of prices.
Ob upoštevanju nizke stopnje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti proizvajalcev Unije, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (47) in (48), je jasno, da uvedba ukrepov po pričakovanjih ne bo privedla do pomanjkanja oskrbe ali posledičnega zvišanja cen.
Further to the above it appears that the Union user industry has already started exploring the possibility of imports from China.
Poleg zgoraj navedenega se zdi, da je uporabniška industrija Unije že začela raziskovati možnost uvoza iz Kitajske.
The fact that such option exists and is considered reliable demonstrates that any imposition of measures will not in any way lead to a shortage of the product concerned.
Dejstvo, da takšna možnost obstaja in velja za zanesljivo, kaže na to, da uvedba ukrepov nikakor ne bo privedla do pomanjkanja zadevnega izdelka.
The percentage in turnover of the final products incorporating the product concerned was also looked at.
Preverjen je bil tudi delež v prihodkih od prodaje končnih izdelkov, ki vsebujejo zadevni izdelek.
To this respect it is noted that in both cases the relevant products represent less than 10 % of their turnovers.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je zadevni izdelek v obeh primerih pomenil manj kot 10 % prihodkov od prodaje.
The percentages of the product concerned being incorporated into the final products was also investigated.
Preverjen je bil tudi delež zadevnega izdelka, ki je sestavni del končnih izdelkov.
The investigation established that in general these percentages are extremely small (on average less than 5 % on the total cost), and therefore the product concerned does not represent a very significant cost element in the finished products.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so ti deleži na splošno zelo majhni (v povprečju manj kot 5 % celotnih stroškov), zato zadevni izdelek ne predstavlja zelo pomembnega stroškovnega elementa v končnih izdelkih.
The Commission examined also if the imposition of measures would have any significant negative financial impact on the situation of these two users.
Komisija je tudi preverila, ali bi uvedba ukrepov imela pomemben negativni finančni vpliv na položaj obeh uporabnikov.
The Commission established two scenarios, i.e. worst case scenario and a more realistic scenario.
Komisija je pripravila dva scenarija, tj. scenarij za najslabši možni primer in bolj realen scenarij.
The worst case scenario assumes that both the import and Union prices increased by the level of the duty.
Scenarij v najslabšem možnem primeru predvideva, da se uvozne cene in cene Unije povečajo za stopnjo dajatve.
This would increase on average the costs of the users by less than 2 %.
To bi v povprečju zvišalo stroške uporabnikov za manj kot 2 %.
The above situation has to be compared with the profitability rates of the co-operating Union users.
Zgornji primer je treba primerjati s stopnjami dobičkonosnosti sodelujočih uporabnikov Unije.
The users’ profitability on products incorporating the product concerned is around 11 % and for all their products was over 20 %.
Dobičkonosnost uporabnikov pri izdelkih, ki vsebujejo zadevni izdelek, je okoli 11 %, za vse njihove izdelke pa več kot 20 %.
Account taken of such profitability rates even a full pass of measures to both import and Union prices would not have a disproportionate effect on these parties’ financial situation.
Ob upoštevanju takih stopenj dobičkonosnosti celo uvedba vseh ukrepov za uvozne cene in cene Unije ne bi imela nesorazmernega učinka na finančno stanje teh strani.
In fact a much more realistic scenario is that the imposition of measures would lead to a situation where only import prices from BiH increase while the Union industry benefits from increased economies of scale.
Dejansko je veliko bolj realen scenarij ta, da bi uvedba ukrepov privedla do stanja, ko bi se zvišale samo uvozne cene iz BiH, medtem ko bi industrija Unije imela koristi od povečane ekonomije obsega.
Indeed, as explained above, the supply situation of the product concerned within the EU is fully sufficient, since most Union producers operate at far from full capacity.
Kot prej pojasnjeno, je oskrba z zadevnim izdelkom v EU popolnoma zadostna, saj večina proizvajalcev Unije posluje precej pod mejo polne zmogljivosti.
It should also be noted that the investigation established that there are products that could be substituted for the product concerned.
Treba je tudi navesti, da je preiskava pokazala, da obstajajo izdelki, ki lahko nadomestijo zadevni izdelek.
Indeed, it is clear that both the co-operating and non co-operating users also produce laundry detergents without the product concerned.
Jasno je, da tako sodelujoči kot tudi nesodelujoči uporabniki detergente za perilo proizvajajo tudi brez zadevnega izdelka.
In this more realistic scenario, the costs of the cooperating users will only increase by a fraction of one percent.
V tem bolj realnem scenariju se bodo stroški sodelujočih porabnikov zvišali samo za en odstotek.
In other words, in light of the profitability figures the imposition of measures will only have negligible consequences for users.
Z drugimi besedami, v vidika dobičkonosnosti bo imela uvedba ukrepov za uporabnike le zanemarljive posledice.
Account taken of the above it is clear that the imposition of measures would not lead to any significant impact to users and thus it is highly unlikely that there would even be any increase in price to the consumers.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je jasno, da uvedba ukrepov ne bi imela pomembnega vpliva na uporabnike, zato je zelo malo verjetno, da bi prišlo do zvišanja cen za potrošnike.
Overall, it is expected that the Union industry would clearly be in a position to benefit from measures.
Na splošno se pričakuje, da bi industrija Unije lahko imela koristi od ukrepov.
Indeed, they could in the first place benefit from increased economies of scale because of a higher capacity utilization due to an increase in production and sales.
Industrija bi imela koristi predvsem od povečane ekonomije obsega zaradi boljše izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, saj bi se proizvodnja in prodaja povečali.
Account taken of the above it is provisionally concluded that the imposition of measures on dumped imports of the product concerned from Bosnia and Herzegovina will not affect the Union users significantly and that overall it is in the Union interest.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega se začasno sklene, da uvedba ukrepov za dampinški uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Bosne in Hercegovine ne bo znatno vplivala na uporabnike Unije ter da je uvedba na splošno v interesu Unije.
In view of the conclusions reached above with regard to dumping, resulting injury and Union interest, provisional measures on imports of the product concerned from Bosnia and Herzegovina should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Union industry by dumped imports.
Glede na zgornje sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, posledično škodo in interesom Unije je treba uvesti začasne ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Bosne in Hercegovine, da se prepreči, da bi dampinški uvoz še naprej povzročal škodo industriji Unije.
The level of the provisional anti-dumping measures should be sufficient to eliminate the injury to the Union industry caused by the dumped imports, without exceeding the dumping margins found.
Stopnja začasnih protidampinških ukrepov mora zadostovati za odpravo škode, ki jo je industriji Unije povzročil dampinški uvoz, ne da bi presegla ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Union industry to cover its costs and obtain a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports.
Glede izračuna zneska dajatve, potrebne za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, je bilo sklenjeno, da bi morali ukrepi industriji Unije omogočati, da pokrije svoje stroške in ustvari dobiček pred obdavčitvijo, ki bi ga lahko ustvarila v okviru normalnih konkurenčnih pogojev, tj. brez dampinškega uvoza.
The pre-tax profit margin used for this calculation was 5,9 % of turnover.
Stopnja dobička pred odbitkom davka, ki se je uporabila za ta izračun, je bila 5,9 % prometa.
This was the profit level achieved by the Union industry in the IP for all its products including the product concerned.
To je bila stopnja dobička, ki jo je industrija Unije dosegala v OP pri vseh svojih izdelkih, vključno z zadevnim izdelkom.
Bearing in mind that the profitability for the product concerned was affected by dumped imports it is clear that this level of profit is prudent and not excessive.
Ob upoštevanju, da je na dobičkonosnost za zadevni izdelek vplival dampinški uvoz, je jasno, da je ta stopnja dobička preudarna in ni pretirana.
It was also considered whether the profit rates achieved by the Union industry in 2005-2007 should be used but the profit rates were low in terms of profitability achieved by the companies for similar products and were not considered to be representative for a viable industry.
Proučeno je bilo tudi, ali naj se uporabijo stopnje dobička, ki jih je industrija Unije dosegala med letoma 2005 in 2007, vendar so bile stopnje dobička nizke v smislu dobičkonosnosti družb za podobne izdelke in niso bile upoštevane kot reprezentativne za uspešno industrijo.
This is because the Bosnian imports undercut those of the Union industry by between 10-20 % during these 3 years and such differences would have played a significant role in annual contract negotiations.
To je posledica tega, da je uvoz iz Bosne v teh treh letih nelojalno znižal cene industrije Unije za 10 do 20 %, takšne razlike pa bi imele pri pogajanjih za letne pogodbe pomembno vlogo.
Thus these profit margins could not be considered representative of a normal situation in the EU market.
Zato teh stopenj dobička ni mogoče šteti kot reprezentativne za običajne razmere na trgu EU.
On the basis mentioned above, a non-injurious price was calculated for the Union industry of the like product.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena za podobni izdelek industrije Unije.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by adding the above mentioned profit margin to the cost of production.
Neškodljiva cena je bila izračunana tako, da so se zgoraj navedeni stopnji prišteli stroški proizvodnje.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the undercutting calculations, with the average non-injurious price of products sold by the Union industry on the EU market.
Potrebno povišanje cene je bilo nato določeno na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno, določeno pri izračunu nelojalnega nižanja cen, in povprečno neškodljivo ceno izdelkov, ki jih je industrija Unije prodajala na trgu EU.
The difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average import CIF value.
Razlika, ki izhaja iz te primerjave, je bila nato izražena kot odstotek povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
The underselling margin thereby calculated was 31,5 %.
Tako izračunana stopnja nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen je bila 31,5 %.
In the light of the foregoing, and in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, it is considered that provisional anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports originating in the Bosnia and Herzegovina at the level of the dumping margin found.
Glede na že navedeno in v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe se šteje, da je treba uvesti začasne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz s poreklom iz Bosne in Hercegovine na ravni ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
On the basis of the above, the rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty for Bosnia and Herzegovina is 28,1 %.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve za Bosno in Hercegovino 28,1 %.
Furthermore, it should be stated that the findings concerning the imposition of duties made for the purpose of this Regulation are provisional and may have to be reconsidered for the purpose of any definitive duty,
Povedati bi bilo treba tudi, da so ugotovitve v zvezi z uvedbo dajatev za namen te uredbe začasne in se zaradi kakršne koli dokončne dajatve spremenijo –
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of zeolite A powder, also referred to as Zeolite NaA or Zeolite 4A powder, currently falling within CN code ex28421000 (TARIC code 2842100030) and originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Uvede se začasna protidampinška dajatev za uvoz zeolita A v prahu, znanega tudi kot zeolit NaA ali zeolit 4A v prahu, trenutno uvrščenega pod oznako KN ex28421000 (oznaka TARIC 2842100030) in s poreklom iz Bosne in Hercegovine.
The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 shall be 28,1 %.
Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Unije, pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelek iz odstavka 1 je 28,1 %.
Without prejudice to Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, interested parties may request disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which this Regulation was adopted, make their views known in writing and apply to be heard orally by the Commission within one month of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Brez poseganja v člen 20 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 lahko zainteresirane strani v enem mesecu od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe zahtevajo razkritje bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta ta uredba, ter v pisni obliki izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za ustno zaslišanje pred Komisijo.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within one month of the date of its entry into force.
V skladu s členom 21(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 lahko zadevne strani predložijo pripombe v zvezi z uporabo te uredbe v roku enega meseca od dneva začetka njene veljavnosti.
OJ C 40, 17.2.2010, p. 5.
UL C 40, 17.2.2010, str. 5.
However this analysis is complicated by raw material and energy price increases which have impacted on prices of the product concerned.
Vendar pa to analizo otežujejo višje cene surovin in energije, ki so vplivale na cene zadevnega izdelka.
Profitability, cash flow, and return on investment all deteriorated over the period 2005-2008.
V obdobju 2005–2008 so se zmanjšali dobičkonosnost, denarni tok in donosnost naložb.
It can be reasonably concluded that such increasing imports in a contracting market were responsible for price suppression in 2008 and 2009.
Razumno je mogoče sklepati, da je tak naraščajoč uvoz na trgu, ki se je krčil, prispeval k zajezitvi cen v letih 2008 in 2009.
This effect of the dumped imports on prices was magnified by the fact that most sales were made on the basis of annual contracts.
Ta vpliv dampinškega uvoza na cene je povečevalo dejstvo, da je večina prodaje potekala na podlagi letnih pogodb.
The increases in these costs were indeed significant and took place mainly in 2008.
Povečanja teh stroškov so bila resnično precejšnja in so bila izvedena predvsem leta 2008.
This no doubt had some impact on profitability in that year because they occurred at a time of falling sales volume.
To je brez dvoma v določeni meri vplivalo na dobičkonosnost v tem letu, saj je do povečanj prišlo v času, ko se je obseg prodaje zmanjševal.
However, the overcapacity and low capacity utilisation issues can partially explain some of the negative injury indicators suffered by the Union producers but do not explain the large declines in production, sales volume and market share in 2009.
Težave, povezane s presežkom zmogljivosti in nizko izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti, lahko deloma pojasnijo nekaj negativnih kazalcev škode, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Unije, ne pojasnjujejo pa velikega upada potrošnje, obsega prodaje in tržnega deleža v letu 2009.
They clearly therefore do not break the causal link between the big increase in imports at dumped prices and the injury suffered by the Union producers.
Zato je jasno, da te težave ne prekinjajo vzročne zveze med velikim porastom uvoza po dampinških cenah in škodo, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Unije.
Therefore, it again cannot explain the large declines in production, sales volume and market share in 2009.
Zato ne more pojasniti velikega zmanjšanja proizvodnje, obsega prodaje in tržnega deleža v letu 2009.
It clearly therefore does not break the causal link between the big increase in imports at dumped prices and the injury suffered by the Union producers.
Zato je jasno, da ne prekinja vzročne povezave med velikim porastom uvoza po dampinških cenah in škodo, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Unije.
Fabrika Glinice Birac AD, Zvornik
Fabrika Glinice Birac AD, Zvornik,
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1037/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1037/2010
This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 November 2010.
Ta uredba začne veljati 16. novembra 2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1038/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1038/2010
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 November 2010
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit, ki se uporabljajo od 16. novembra 2010
Import duties should be fixed for the period from 16 November 2010 and should apply until new import duties are fixed and enter into force,
Uvozne dajatve, ki se uporabljajo, dokler ne začne veljati nova določitev, se določijo za obdobje z začetkom 16. novembra 2010 –
From 16 November 2010, the import duties in the cereals sector referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 shall be those fixed in Annex I to this Regulation on the basis of the information contained in Annex II.
Od 16. novembra 2010 so uvozne dajatve v sektorju žit iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 dajatve, določene v Prilogi I k tej uredbi na podlagi podatkov, navedenih v Prilogi II.
Import duties on the products referred to in Article 136(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 applicable from 16 November 2010
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 136(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se uporabljajo od 16. novembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1039/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1039/2010
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1029/2010 [4]
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1029/2010 [4].
OJ L 296, 13.11.2010, p. 17.
UL L 296, 13.11.2010, str. 17.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 16 November 2010
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 16. novembra 2010
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1040/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1040/2010
of 16 November 2010
z dne 16. novembra 2010
Russia has, as in 2009, notified the European Union of its intent to make use of the provisions in Article 3(3) within the time limits set by the Agreement.
Rusija je, tako kot leta 2009, obvestila Evropsko unijo, da namerava uveljaviti določbe iz člena 3(3) v roku, določenem s Sporazumom.
It is appropriate to make the necessary adjustments to the quantitative limits for the year 2010 resulting from Russia’s request.
Količinske omejitve za leto 2010, ki izhajajo iz zahteve Rusije, je primerno prilagoditi.
The quantitative limits for the year 2010 set out in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1342/2007 are replaced by those set out in Annex I to this Regulation.
Količinske omejitve za leto 2010 iz Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1342/2007 se nadomestijo z omejitvami iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
The quantitative limits for the year 2011 resulting from the application of Article 10(1) of the 2007 Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on trade in certain steel products are set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Količinske omejitve za leto 2011, ki so posledica uporabe člena 10(1) Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Rusko federacijo iz leta 2007 o trgovini z nekaterimi jeklenimi izdelki, so določene v Prilogi II k tej uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 16 November 2010.
V Bruslju, 16. novembra 2010
QUANTITATIVE LIMITS FOR 2010
KOLIČINSKE OMEJITVE ZA 2010
SA and SB are product categories
SA in SB sta kategoriji izdelkov.
to SA6 and SB1 to SB3 are product groups
do SA6 in SB1 do SB3 so skupine izdelkov.
Coils
SA1. kolobarji
Heavy plate
SA2. debela pločevina
Other flat products
SA3. drugi ploščati valjani izdelki
Alloyed products
SA4. legirani izdelki
Alloyed quarto plates
SA5. legirane plošče kvarto
Alloyed cold-rolled and coated sheets
SA6. legirana hladno valjana in prevlečena pločevina
Beams
SB1. gredi
Wire rod
SB2. jeklo za žice
Other long products
SB3. drugi podolgovati izdelki
QUANTITATIVE LIMITS FOR 2011
KOLIČINSKE OMEJITVE ZA 2011
Year 2010
Leto 2010
Year 2011
Leto 2011
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1041/2010
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1041/2010