natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the ESRB decides that its recommendation has not been followed or that the addressees have failed to provide adequate justification for their inaction, it shall, subject to strict rules of confidentiality, inform the addressees, the Council and, where relevant, the European Supervisory Authority concerned.
Če ESRB presodi, da njegovo priporočilo ni bilo upoštevano ali da naslovniki niso ustrezno pojasnili, zakaj niso ukrepali, o tem v skladu s strogimi pravili o zaupnosti obvesti naslovnike, Svet in po potrebi zadevni Evropski nadzorni organ.
If the ESRB has made a decision under paragraph 2 on a recommendation that has been made public following the procedure set out in Article 18(1), the European Parliament may invite the Chair of the ESRB to present that decision and the addressees may request to participate in an exchange of views.
Če je ESRB v skladu z odstavkom 2 sprejel odločitev o priporočilu, ki je bilo objavljeno po postopku iz člena 18(1), lahko Evropski parlament pozove predsednika ESRB, naj predstavi odločitev, naslovniki pa lahko zahtevajo, da se udeležijo izmenjave mnenj.
Public warnings and recommendations
Javna opozorila in priporočila
The General Board shall decide on a case-by-case basis, after having informed the Council sufficiently in advance so that it is able to react, whether a warning or a recommendation should be made public.
Splošni odbor se, potem ko je dovolj zgodaj obvestil Svet, da se ta lahko odzove, za vsak primer posebej odloči, ali je treba opozorilo ali priporočilo javno objaviti.
Notwithstanding Article 10(3), a quorum of two-thirds shall always apply to decisions taken by the General Board under this paragraph.
Ne glede na člen 10(3) je za odločitve splošnega odbora, sprejete v skladu s tem odstavkom, potrebna sklepčnost dveh tretjin članov.
If the General Board decides to make a warning or recommendation public, it shall inform the addressees in advance.
Če se splošni odbor odloči javno objaviti opozorilo ali priporočilo, o tem vnaprej obvesti naslovnike.
The addressees of warnings and recommendations made public by the ESRB shall also be provided with the right of making public their views and reasoning in response thereto.
Naslovniki opozoril in priporočil, ki jih javno objavi ESRB, imajo pravico, da kot odziv nanje javno objavijo svoja mnenja in razloge.
Where the General Board decides not to make a warning or a recommendation public, the addressees and, where appropriate, the Council and the ESAs shall take all the measures necessary for the protection of their confidential nature.
Kadar se splošni odbor odloči, da ne bo javno objavil opozorila ali priporočila, naslovniki ter, kadar je primerno, Svet in ESA sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zaščito njune zaupne narave.
Accountability and reporting obligations
Odgovornost in obveznost poročanja
At least annually and more frequently in the event of widespread financial distress, the Chair of the ESRB shall be invited to an annual hearing in the European Parliament, marking the publication of the ESRB’s annual report to the European Parliament and the Council.
Vsaj enkrat na leto, v primeru obsežnejših finančnih težav pa pogosteje, je predsednik ESRB ob objavi letnega poročila ESRB v Evropskem parlamentu in Svetu povabljen na letno predstavitev v Evropskem parlamentu.
That hearing shall be conducted separately from the monetary dialogue between the European Parliament and the President of the ECB.
Te predstavitve potekajo ločeno od dialoga o monetarni politiki med Evropskim parlamentom in predsednikom ECB.
The annual report referred to in paragraph 1 shall contain the information that the General Board decides to make public in accordance with Article 18.
Letno poročilo iz odstavka 1 vsebuje informacije, za katere se splošni odbor odloči ali jih bo javno objavil v skladu s členom 18.
The annual report shall be made available to the public.
Letno poročilo se objavi.
The ESRB shall also examine specific issues at the invitation of the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission.
ESRB na povabilo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta ali Komisije preuči tudi posebna vprašanja.
The European Parliament may request the Chair of the ESRB to attend a hearing of the competent Committees of the European Parliament.
4. Evropski parlament lahko od predsednika ESRB zahteva, da se udeleži predstavitve v pristojnih odborih Evropskega parlamenta.
The Chair of the ESRB shall hold confidential oral discussions at least twice a year and more often if deemed appropriate, behind closed doors with the Chair and Vice-Chairs of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee of the European Parliament on the ongoing activity of the ESRB.
Predsednik ESRB vsaj dvakrat letno ali večkrat, če je to primerno, za zaprtimi vrati zaupno ustno razpravlja s predsednikom in podpredsedniki Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve o tekočih dejavnostih ESRB.
An agreement shall be concluded between the European Parliament and the ESRB on the detailed modalities of organising those meetings, with a view to ensuring full confidentiality in accordance with Article 8.
Da se zagotovi zaupnost v skladu s členom 8, Evropski parlament in ESRB skleneta dogovor o podrobnostih glede organizacije teh sestankov.
The ESRB shall provide a copy of that agreement to the Council.
ESRB posreduje Svetu kopijo tega dogovora.
By 17 December 2013, the European Parliament and the Council shall examine this Regulation on the basis of a report from the Commission and, after having received an opinion from the ECB and the ESAs, shall determine whether the mission and organisation of the ESRB need to be reviewed.
Evropski parlament in Svet do 17. decembra 2013 preučita to uredbo na podlagi poročila Komisije in po prejemu mnenja ECB in ESA odločita, ali je treba ponovno pregledati poslanstvo in organizacijo ESRB.
They shall, in particular, review the modalities for the designation or election of the Chair of the ESRB.
Zlasti pregledata način imenovanja ali izvolitve predsednika ESRB.
OJ C 270, 11.11.2009, p. 1.
UL C 270, 11.11.2009, str. 1.
Opinion of 22 January 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 22. januarja 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ C 40, 7.2.2001, p. 453.
UL C 40, 7.2.2001, str. 453.
OJ C 25 E, 29.1.2004, p. 394.
UL C 25 E, 29.1.2004, str. 394.
OJ C 175 E, 10.7.2008, p. 392.
UL C 175 E, 10.7.2008, str. 392.
OJ C 8 E, 14.1.2010, p. 26.
UL C 8 E, 14.1.2010, str. 26.
OJ C 9 E, 15.1.2010, p. 48.
UL C 9 E, 15.1.2010, str. 48.
OJ C 184 E, 8.7.2010, p. 214.
UL C 184 E, 8.7.2010, str. 214.
OJ C 184 E, 8.7.2010, p. 292.
UL C 184 E, 8.7.2010, str. 292.
European Court Reports 2006 Page I-03771, para 44.
Poročila Sodišča 2006, stran I-03771, odstavek 44.
See page 162 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 162 tega Uradnega lista.
The Council on 9 June 2009 and the European Council at its meeting of 18 and 19 June 2009 supported the Commission’s suggestions and welcomed its intention to put forward legislative proposals for the new framework to be in place in the course of 2010.
Predloge Komisije sta podprla Svet, na seji dne 9. junija 2009, in Evropski svet na zasedanju dne 18. in 19. junija 2009, ter pozdravila njeno namero, da poda zakonodajne predloge, ki bodo omogočali polno vzpostavitev novega okvira v letu 2010.
In line with the views of the Commission, the Council concluded, inter alia, that the European Central Bank (ECB) ‘should provide analytical, statistical, administrative and logistical support to the ESRB, also drawing on technical advice from national central banks and supervisors’.
V skladu s stališči Komisije je Svet med drugim sklenil, da bi Evropska centralna banka (ECB) „morala ESRB zagotavljati analitično, statistično, upravno in logistično podporo ter pri tem uporabiti tudi tehnično pomoč nacionalnih centralnih bank in nadzornikov“.
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC
o ustanovitvi Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropski bančni organ) in o spremembi Sklepa št. 716/2009/ES ter razveljavitvi Sklepa Komisije 2009/78/ES
The financial crisis in 2007 and 2008 exposed important shortcomings in financial supervision, both in particular cases and in relation to the financial system as a whole.
Finančna kriza v letih 2007 in 2008 je razkrila pomembne pomanjkljivosti pri finančnem nadzoru v posameznih primerih kot tudi v zvezi s celotnim finančnim sistemom.
The crisis exposed shortcomings in the areas of cooperation, coordination, consistent application of Union law and trust between national supervisors.
Med krizo so se pokazale pomanjkljivosti na področju sodelovanja, usklajevanja, dosledne uporabe prava Unije in zaupanja med nacionalnimi nadzorniki.
Before and during the financial crisis, the European Parliament has called for a move towards more integrated European supervision in order to ensure a true level playing field for all actors at the level of the Union and to reflect the increasing integration of financial markets in the Union (in its resolutions of 13 April 2000 on the Commission communication on implementing the framework for financial markets: Action Plan [4], of 21 November 2002 on prudential supervision rules in the European Union [5], of 11 July 2007 on financial services policy (2005 to 2010) – White Paper [6], of 23 September 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on hedge funds and private equity [7] and of 9 October 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on Lamfalussy follow-up: future structure of supervision [8], and in its positions of 22 April 2009 on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) [9] and of 23 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Credit Rating Agencies [10]).
Evropski parlament je pred in v času finančne krize pozval k bolj povezanemu evropskemu nadzoru, da bi zagotovili resnično enake konkurenčne pogoje za vse udeležence na ravni Unije in se odzvali na čedalje večjo povezanost finančnih trgov v Uniji (v svojih resolucijah z dne 13. aprila 2000 o sporočilu Komisije o izvajanju okvira za finančni trg: akcijski načrt [4], z dne 21. novembra 2002 o pravilih bonitetnega nadzora v Evropski uniji [5], z dne 11. julija 2007 o politiki finančnih storitev (2005–2010) – bela knjiga [6], z dne 23. septembra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o hedge skladih in skladih zasebnega kapitala [7] in z dne 9. oktobra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o nadaljevanju Lamfalussyjevega procesa: prihodnja struktura nadzora [8] ter s stališčema z dne 22. aprila 2009 o spremenjenem predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) [9] ter z dne 23. aprila 2009 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o bonitetnih agencijah [10]).
In November 2008, the Commission mandated a High-Level Group chaired by Jacques de Larosière to make recommendations on how to strengthen European supervisory arrangements with a view to better protecting the citizen and rebuilding trust in the financial system.
V novembru 2008 je Komisija pooblastila skupino na visoki ravni, kateri je predsedoval Jacques de Larosière, da pripravi priporočila, kako okrepiti evropsko nadzorno ureditev z namenom boljše zaščite državljanov in vzpostavitve ponovnega zaupanja v finančni sistem.
In its final report presented on 25 February 2009 (the ‘de Larosière Report’), the High-Level Group recommended that the supervisory framework be strengthened to reduce the risk and severity of future financial crises.
V končnem poročilu, predstavljenem 25. februarja 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: de Larosièrovo poročilo), je skupina na visoki ravni priporočila, da je treba okrepiti nadzorni okvir za zmanjšanje tveganja in resnosti prihodnjih finančnih kriz.
It recommended reforms to the structure of supervision of the financial sector in the Union.
Priporočila je reforme strukture nadzora nad finančnim sektorjem v Uniji.
The group also concluded that a European System of Financial Supervisors should be created, comprising three European Supervisory Authorities, one for the banking sector, one for the securities sector and one for the insurance and occupational pensions sector, and recommended the creation of a European Systemic Risk Council.
Skupina je ugotovila tudi, da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti evropski sistem finančnih nadzornikov, ki bi ga sestavljali trije evropski nadzorni organi, in sicer za bančni sektor, za sektor vrednostnih papirjev ter za sektor zavarovanj in poklicnih pokojnin, poleg tega je skupina predlagala tudi ustanovitev evropskega sveta za sistemska tveganja.
The report represented the reforms the experts considered were needed and on which work had to begin immediately.
V poročilu so bile predstavljene reforme, za katere so strokovnjaki menili, da so potrebne in pri katerih bi bilo treba takoj začeti delo.
In its Communication of 4 March 2009 entitled ‘Driving European Recovery’, the Commission proposed to put forward draft legislation creating a European system of financial supervision and a European systemic risk board.
Komisija je v sporočilu z dne 4. marca 2009 z naslovom „Spodbujanje okrevanja evropskega gospodarstva“ predlagala pripravo osnutka zakonodaje za vzpostavitev evropskega sistema finančnega nadzora in ustanovitev Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja.
In its Communication of 27 May 2009 entitled ‘European Financial Supervision’, it provided more detail about the possible architecture of such a new supervisory framework reflecting the main thrust of the de Larosière Report.
V sporočilu z dne 27. maja 2009 z naslovom „Evropski finančni nadzor“ pa je navedla več podrobnosti o mogoči strukturi takega novega nadzornega okvira in upoštevala bistvo de Larosièrovega poročila.
The European Council, in its conclusions of 19 June 2009, confirmed that a European System of Financial Supervisors, comprising three new European Supervisory Authorities, should be established.
Evropski svet je v svojih sklepih z dne 19. junija 2009 potrdil, da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti evropski sistem finančnih nadzornikov, ki ga sestavljajo trije novi Evropski nadzorni organi.
The system should be aimed at upgrading the quality and consistency of national supervision, strengthening oversight of cross-border groups and establishing a European single rule book applicable to all financial institutions in the internal market.
Sistem bi moral biti usmerjen k izboljšanju kakovosti in doslednosti nacionalnega nadzora, krepitvi nadzora čezmejnih skupin ter pripravi enotnih evropskih pravil, ki se uporabljajo za vse finančne institucije na notranjem trgu.
It emphasised that the European Supervisory Authorities should also have supervisory powers in relation to credit rating agencies and invited the Commission to prepare concrete proposals on how the European System of Financial Supervisors could play a strong role in crisis situations, while stressing that decisions taken by the European Supervisory Authorities should not impinge on the fiscal responsibilities of Member States.
Evropski svet je poudaril, da bi morali imeti Evropski nadzorni organi tudi pooblastila za nadzor nad bonitetnimi agencijami, in Komisijo pozval, naj pripravi konkretne predloge, kako bi lahko evropski sistem finančnih nadzornikov imel pomembno vlogo v kriznih razmerah, hkrati pa je poudaril, da odločitve, ki bi jih sprejeli Evropski nadzorni organi, ne bi smele vplivati na fiskalne obveznosti držav članic.
On 17 June 2010, the European Council agreed that ‘Member States should introduce systems of levies and taxes on financial institutions to ensure fair burden-sharing and to set incentives to contain systemic risk.
Evropski svet je 17. junija 2010 soglašal, da bi morale „države članice za finančne institucije uvesti sisteme dajatev in davkov, s katerimi bi zagotovili pravično delitev bremena in oblikovali pobude za obvladovanje sistemskega tveganja.
The financial and economic crisis has created real and serious risks to the stability of the financial system and the functioning of the internal market.
Finančna in gospodarska kriza je povzročila dejanska in resna tveganja za stabilnost finančnega sistema in delovanja notranjega trga.
Restoring and maintaining a stable and reliable financial system is an absolute prerequisite to preserving trust and coherence in the internal market, and thereby to preserve and improve the conditions for the establishment of a fully integrated and functioning internal market in the field of financial services.
Obnovitev in vzdrževanje stabilnega in zanesljivega finančnega sistema je osnoven predpogoj za ohranjanje zaupanja in skladnosti na notranjem trgu in s tem ohranjanje ter izboljšanje pogojev za vzpostavitev v celoti integriranega in delujočega notranjega trga na področju finančnih storitev.
Moreover, deeper and more integrated financial markets offer better opportunities for financing and risk diversification, and thus help to improve the capacity of the economies to absorb shocks.
Poleg tega močneje integrirani finančni trgi zagotavljajo boljše priložnosti za financiranje in razpršitev tveganja ter tako prispevajo k izboljšanju sposobnosti gospodarstev za obvladovanje pretresov.
The Union has reached the limits of what can be done with the present status of the Committees of European Supervisors.
Unija je dosegla vse, kar je mogoče doseči s sedanjim statusom odborov evropskih nadzornikov.
The Union cannot remain in a situation where there is no mechanism to ensure that national supervisors arrive at the best possible supervisory decisions for cross-border financial institutions; where there is insufficient cooperation and information exchange between national supervisors; where joint action by national authorities requires complicated arrangements to take account of the patchwork of regulatory and supervisory requirements; where national solutions are most often the only feasible option in responding to problems at the level of the Union, and where different interpretations of the same legal text exist.
Unija ne more ostati v položaju, v katerem nima nobenega mehanizma za zagotovitev, da nacionalni nadzorniki sprejemajo najboljše mogoče nadzorne odločitve za čezmejne finančne institucije, v katerem ni zadostnega sodelovanja in izmenjave informacij med nacionalnimi nadzorniki, v katerem skupni ukrepi nacionalnih organov zaradi upoštevanja najrazličnejših regulativnih in nadzornih zahtev zahtevajo zapleteno ureditev, ko so nacionalne rešitve najpogosteje edina izvedljiva možnost pri odzivu na težave na ravni Unije in v katerem obstajajo različne razlage istega pravnega besedila.
The European System of Financial Supervision (hereinafter ‘the ESFS’) should be designed to overcome those deficiencies and provide a system that is in line with the objective of a stable and single Union financial market for financial services, linking national supervisors within a strong Union network.
Za odpravljanje teh pomanjkljivosti ter zagotovitev sistema, ki je v skladu s ciljem stabilnega in enotnega finančnega trga Unije za finančne storitve ter nacionalne nadzornike povezuje v močno mrežo Unije, bi bilo treba oblikovati Evropski sistem finančnega nadzora (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESFS).
The ESFS should be an integrated network of national and Union supervisory authorities, leaving day-to-day supervision to the national level.
ESFS bi morala biti povezana mreža nacionalnih nadzornih organov in nadzornih organov Unije, pri čemer bi vsakodnevni nadzor ostal na nacionalni ravni.
Greater harmonisation and the coherent application of rules for financial institutions and markets across the Union should also be achieved.
Doseči bi bilo treba tudi večjo usklajenost in skladno uporabo pravil za finančne institucije in trge po vsej Uniji.
In addition to the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (hereinafter ‘the Authority’), a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) as well as a Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (hereinafter ‘the Joint Committee’) should be established.
Poleg Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropski bančni organ) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Organ) bi bilo treba ustanoviti tudi Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine), Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge) in Skupni odbor evropskih nadzornih organov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Skupni odbor).
A European Systemic Risk Board (hereinafter ‘the ESRB’) should form part of the ESFS for the purposes of the tasks as specified in this Regulation and in Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Evropski odbor za sistemska tveganja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESRB) bi moral biti del ESFS za namene izvajanja nalog iz te uredbe in Uredbe (EU) št. 1092/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].
The European Supervisory Authorities (hereinafter collectively referred to as the ‘ESAs’) should replace the Committee of European Banking Supervisors established by Commission Decision 2009/78/EC [12], the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors established by Commission Decision 2009/79/EC [13] and the Committee of European Securities Regulators established by Commission Decision 2009/77/EC [14], and should assume all of the tasks and competences of those committees including the continuation of ongoing work and projects, where appropriate.
Evropski nadzorni organi (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj: ESA) bi morali nadomestiti Odbor evropskih bančnih nadzornikov, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije 2009/78/ES [12], Odbor evropskih nadzornikov za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije 2009/79/ES [13], in Odbor evropskih zakonodajalcev za vrednostne papirje, ustanovljen s Sklepom Komisije 2009/77/ES [14], ter bi morali prevzeti vse naloge in pristojnosti navedenih odborov, vključno z nadaljevanjem tekočega dela in projektov, kjer je to primerno.
The scope of each European Supervisory Authority’s action should be clearly defined.
Obseg delovanja vsakega Evropskega nadzornega organa bi bilo treba jasno opredeliti.
The ESAs should be accountable to the European Parliament and the Council.
ESA bi morali biti odgovorni Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
When that accountability relates to cross-sectoral issues that have been coordinated through the Joint Committee, the ESAs should be accountable, through the Joint Committee, for such coordination.
Kadar se ta odgovornost nanaša na medsektorska vprašanja, ki so se usklajevala prek Skupnega odbora, bi morali biti ESA odgovorni za to usklajevanje prek Skupnega odbora.
The Authority should act with a view to improving the functioning of the internal market, in particular by ensuring a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision taking account of the varying interests of all Member States and the different nature of financial institutions.
Organ bi moral delovati z namenom prispevati k izboljšanju delovanja notranjega trga, zlasti z zagotavljanjem visoke, učinkovite in skladne stopnje regulacije in nadzora ob upoštevanju različnih interesov vseh držav članic in različne narave finančnih institucij.
The Authority should protect public values such as the stability of the financial system, the transparency of markets and financial products, and the protection of depositors and investors.
Organ bi moral varovati javne vrednote, kot so stabilnost finančnega sistema, preglednost trgov in finančnih produktov ter zaščita vlagateljev in investitorjev.