natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bankruptcy and Property laws guarantee stability and legal certainty; and
stečajno pravo in pravo lastninskih razmerij zagotavljata stabilnost in pravno varnost; ter
Exchange rate conversions are carried out at market rates.
pretvorbe valut se izvajajo po tržnih stopnjah.
In the present investigation, all sampled exporting groups requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadlines.
Vse vzorčene skupine izvoznikov so v tej preiskavi zahtevale TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in so v predpisanih rokih izpolnile obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
For all sampled exporting groups, the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified information submitted in the MET claim at the premises of the groups in question.
Komisija je za vse vzorčene skupine izvoznikov zbrala vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne, in v prostorih zadevnih skupin preverila vse informacije, predložene v zahtevku za TGO.
The investigation revealed that MET could not be granted to any of the four Chinese company groups as none of them fulfilled all the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, for the following reasons.
Preiskava je pokazala, da TGO ni mogoče odobriti nobeni od štirih skupin kitajskih družb, saj nobena ni izpolnjevala vseh meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe iz naslednjih razlogov.
All sampled exporting groups failed to demonstrate that they fulfil Criterion 1 because of State interference in decisions concerning the main raw material (aluminium).
Nobena od vzorčenih skupin izvoznikov ni dokazala, da izpolnjuje merilo 1 zaradi vmešavanja države v odločitve glede glavne surovine (aluminij).
Indeed, in all sampled groups, it appears that the vast majority of aluminium used for the production of aluminium road wheels is acquired in the Chinese domestic market on the basis of long term contracts.
Dejansko se zdi, da vse vzorčene skupine pridobijo veliko večino aluminija, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo aluminijastih platišč, na kitajskem domačem trgu na podlagi dolgoročnih pogodb.
Prices are based on quotations of primary aluminium on the Chinese spot markets plus a transformation fee (and in the case of one company also on the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE)).
Cene temeljijo na kotacijah primarnega aluminija na kitajskih gotovinskih trgih z doplačilom za predelavo (in v primeru ene družbe tudi na šanghajski borzi kovin (Shanghai Futures Exchange – SHFE)).
In this respect, it has to be pointed out that quotation on the spot markets run in parallel with the SHFE.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da kotacija na gotovinskih trgih poteka vzporedno s SHFE.
In this regard, it has to be noted that the Chinese State has a primary role in the setting of prices of primary aluminium and interferes in the market continuously with a number of tools.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da ima kitajska država glavno vlogo pri določanju cen primarnega aluminija, pri čemer se z več orodji stalno vmešava v trg.
First, primary aluminium for export is subject to a 17 % VAT (while VAT on exports of finished goods is refunded) plus a 15 % export tax.
Za primarni aluminij za izvoz se plačuje 17 % DDV (medtem ko se DDV za izvoz končnih izdelkov vrača) in izvozni davek v višini 15 %.
Secondly, the State interferes with the price setting mechanisms in the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) which is a closed exchange for Chinese-registered companies and Chinese citizens.
Poleg tega se država vmešava v mehanizme za določanje cen pri SHFE, ki je zaprta borza za družbe, registrirane na Kitajskem, in kitajske državljane.
This State interference with the price setting mechanisms in the SHFE is linked to its position both as a seller of primary aluminium and as a purchaser via the State Reserve Bureau and other State Bodies.
To vmešavanje države v mehanizme za določanje cen na borzi SHFE je povezano z njeno vlogo prodajalca primarnega aluminija ter kupca prek Urada za državne rezerve in drugih državnih organov.
In addition, the State sets daily price limits via the rules of the SHFE which have been approved by the State Regulator, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (the CSRC).
Poleg tega država s pravili SHFE dnevno določa omejitve cen, ki jih odobri državni regulativni organ, tj. Kitajska nadzorna komisija za vrednostne papirje.
Another example of State interference is the recent stimulus package of the Chinese Government aiming at limiting the effects of the economic crisis.
Drug primer vmešavanja države je nedaven paket spodbud kitajske vlade, s katerim naj bi omejila učinke gospodarske krize.
End of 2008, the State Reserves Bureau started a scheme to buy aluminium from smelters to help their operations as the global financial crisis cut demand.
Konec leta 2008 je Urad za državne rezerve uvedel sistem za kupovanje aluminija od talilnic kot pomoč njihovemu delovanju, ker se je povpraševanje zmanjšalo zaradi svetovne finančne krize.
Those State-backed purchases absorbed most of the stocks in the domestic market, driving up prices during the first half of 2009.
S takšnimi nakupi, ki jih je podprla država, se je porabila večina zalog na domačem trgu, zaradi česar so se cene v prvi polovici leta 2009 hitro dvignile.
This was considered as an underlying factor of State interference in decisions of firms regarding raw materials.
To se je obravnavalo kot glavni dejavnik vmešavanja države v odločanje družb v zvezi s surovinami.
Indeed, the current Chinese system of high export duties and lack of VAT reimbursement for export of primary aluminium and other raw materials, combined with no export taxes and VAT reimbursement on exports of the downstream product and State interference in the setting of prices in the SHFE, has essentially led to a situation where Chinese aluminium prices continue to be the result of State intervention.
Dejansko je sedanji kitajski sistem z visokimi izvoznimi dajatvami ter brez povračila DDV za izvoz primarnega aluminija in drugih surovin, skupaj s sistemom brez izvoznih davkov in povračilom DDV za izvoz izdelkov na koncu proizvodnje verige ter vmešavanjem države v določanje cen na borzi SHFE, bistveno prispeval k temu, da so kitajske cene aluminija še naprej rezultat vmešavanja države.
This has led to the situation that, historically, prices in the LME have diverged significantly from those in the Chinese market [4].
Zaradi tega so se cene na borzi LME v preteklosti zelo razlikovale od cen na kitajskem trgu [4].
Between half 2005 and the end of 2008. LME prices have been significantly higher compared to the Chinese markets, underlining the lack of any meaningful arbitrage between Chinese markets and markets in the rest of the world.
Med drugo polovico leta 2005 in koncem leta 2008 so bile cene na LME znatno višje v primerjavi s kitajskimi trgi, kar kaže na odsotnost pomembnejše arbitraže med kitajskimi trgi in trgi drugod po svetu.
Thus, the multiple State-induced distortions in the Chinese primary aluminium prices affect the decisions of Chinese producers of aluminium wheels when acquiring raw materials.
Večkratno državno izkrivljanje kitajskih cen primarnega aluminija zato vpliva na odločitve kitajskih proizvajalcev aluminijastih platišč pri pridobivanju surovin.
In addition, these enjoy an advantage from these distortions, in the sense that they normally make their purchases in the Chinese market from local suppliers using Chinese spot markets prices (or SHFE) as a benchmark but can also buy certain quantities at LME prices when prices in the Chinese market are higher as a result of State intervention.
Poleg tega imajo ti proizvajalci koristi od takšnega izkrivljanja, ker običajno kupujejo na kitajskem trgu od lokalnih dobaviteljev po cenah na kitajskem gotovinskem trgu (ali borzi SHFE), ki pomenijo merilo, hkrati pa lahko določene količine kupujejo po cenah borze LME, če so cene na kitajskem trgu višje zaradi vmešavanja države.
Moreover, in addition to the general situation described above, three other groups do not fulfil other requirements of Criterion 1 because of significant State interference in relation to important business decisions.
Poleg tega razen splošnih razmer, opisanih zgoraj, tri druge skupine ne izpolnjujejo drugih zahtev merila 1 zaradi velikega vmešavanja države v zvezi s pomembnimi poslovnimi odločitvami.
For one of the groups, a State-owned company has veto rights disproportionate to its shareholding in two of its companies on certain main decisions.
Pri eni od skupin ima družba v državni lasti pravico veta na nekatere ključne odločitve, ki je nesorazmerna z njenim imetništvom delnic v dveh družbah iz skupine.
For most of the companies of another group, some main decisions are subject to significant State interference either because the companies are 100 % State-owned or because the director representing the State-owned shareholder has veto rights on important company decisions.
Pri večini družb druge skupine se država zelo vmešava v nekatere ključne odločitve, ker so družbe 100-odstotno v državni lasti ali ker ima direktor, ki zastopa delničarja v državni lasti, pravico veta na pomembne odločitve družbe.
Moreover, despite the companies’ assertion to the contrary, the investigation has revealed that the local State labour Department has veto rights concerning employment of workers in two of these companies.
Čeprav družbe zatrjujejo nasprotno, je preiskava razkrila tudi, da ima lokalno državno ministrstvo za delo pravico veta pri zaposlovanju delavcev v dveh od teh družb.
Finally, in the case of a third group, the family that controls the group has links with the ruling party and one of the companies belonging to the group is subject to significant State interference for certain important decisions given that the director representing a State-owned shareholder has a veto right on important company decisions.
Končno, pri tretji skupini je družina, ki nadzira skupino, povezana z vladajočo stranko, pri čemer se v eno od družb iz skupine pri nekaterih pomembnih odločitvah zelo vmešava država, ker ima direktor, ki zastopa delničarja v državni lasti, pravico veta na pomembne odločitve družbe.
For one group, there is a clear breach of the basic accounting principles in all its companies.
Pri eni od skupin so se v vseh družbah skupine očitno kršila osnovna računovodska načela.
In particular IAS 1 (Presentation of Financial Statements), IAS 12 (Income taxes) and IAS 16 (Property, Plant and Equipment) were not respected.
Upoštevali se niso zlasti MRS 1 (predstavljanje računovodskih izkazov), MRS 12 (davek iz dobička) in MRS 16 (opredmetena osnovna sredstva).
It is therefore considered that the accounts were not prepared and audited in line with International Accounting Standards.
Zato se šteje, da finančna poročila niso bila pripravljena in revidirana v skladu z Mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
For another group the Commission's services found non-compliance with IAS 1 and IAS 31.
Pri drugi skupini so službe Komisije ugotovile neskladnost z MRS 1 in MRS 31.
For one group, there are clear distortions in relation to land use rights and acquisition of fixed assets for several companies and most companies belonging to the group have benefited from preferential tax regimes, tax refunds and subsidies which constitute distortions carried over from the non-market economy system.
Pri več družbah v eni od skupin je bilo ugotovljeno očitno izkrivljanje v zvezi s pravico do rabe zemljišč in pridobitvijo osnovnih sredstev, večina družb skupine pa je bila upravičena do ugodnejšega davčnega režima, povračila davkov in subvencij, kar so izkrivljanja, prenesena iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
These distortions were significant, measured for example in terms of turnover.
Ta izkrivljanja so bila velika, merjena na primer v smislu prihodkov od prodaje.
Concerning another sampled group, three of its companies have benefited from preferential tax regimes which constitute distortions carried over from the non-market economy system.
Pri drugi vzorčeni skupini so bile tri družbe skupine upravičene do ugodnejšega davčnega režima, kar je izkrivljanje, preneseno iz netržnega sistema gospodarstva.
These distortions can be considered as significant for example in terms of turnover.
Ta izkrivljanja se lahko štejejo za velika, na primer v smislu prihodkov od prodaje.
It also appears for another group that two of its companies do not comply with Criterion 3.
Pri drugi skupini dve družbi prav tako nista delovali skladno z merilom 3.
The first one has paid the land use right with a long delay after the due date, without incurring any penalty, despite the fact that penalties were clearly stated in the contract.
Prva je pravico do rabe zemljišč plačala z veliko zamudo po roku plačila, pri čemer ni plačala kazni, čeprav so bile kazni jasno določene v pogodbi.
This meant a direct support by the State (which is the ultimate owner of the land) in the start-up phase of the company.
To pomeni neposredno podporo države (ki je končna lastnica zemljišča) v začetni fazi poslovanja družbe.
As for the second company, it was established following a purchase of the assets of a State-owned producer of aluminium wheels at non-market conditions which translated into an undue advantage in the initial phase of the company's life.
Pri drugi družbi je bil ugotovljen nakup sredstev proizvajalca aluminijastih platišč v državni lasti po netržnih pogojih, kar je pomenilo neupravičeno prednost v zagonski fazi delovanja družbe.
A group claimed that the purchase of assets from a State-owned producer was carried out under market conditions.
Skupina je trdila, da so se sredstva od proizvajalca v državni lasti kupila pod tržnimi pogoji.
Nevertheless, the party failed to demonstrate that the whole of the operation could be considered as free from distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system.
Ni pa mogla dokazati, da pri celotnem poslovanju ni bilo izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
Finally companies belonging to another group enjoyed significant tax exemptions and financial support which had significant impact on their financial situation, measured for example in terms of turnover.
Končno, družbe iz druge skupine so bile upravičene do velikih davčnih oprostitev in finančne podpore, kar je zelo vplivalo na njihov finančni položaj, merjen na primer v smislu prihodkov od prodaje.
The Commission officially disclosed the results of the MET findings to the exporting groups concerned in the PRC, the authorities of the PRC, the Chinese Chamber of Commerce and the complainant.
Komisija je rezultate ugotovitev o TGO razkrila zadevnim skupinam izvoznikov v LRK, organom LRK, kitajski gospodarski zbornici in pritožniku.
They were also given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing if there were particular reasons to be heard.
Ti so imeli tudi možnost, da predložijo svoja stališča v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje, če zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi.
One group challenged the fact that the Commission had failed to decide on MET within the three-months deadline established in the basic Regulation, claiming that the exporters had taken all the necessary steps before this deadline to make it possible for the Commission to know what effect its decision concerning that status might have on the calculation of the dumping margin.
Ena skupina je izpostavila dejstvo, da se Komisija glede TGO ni odločila v trimesečnem roku, ki ga določa osnovna uredba, in trdila, da so izvozniki sprejeli vse potrebne ukrepe pred tem rokom, da bi lahko Komisijo seznanili, kakšen učinek bi lahko imela njena odločitev glede tega statusa na izračun stopnje dampinga.
In other words, it is claimed MET should be assessed within the three months deadline whenever answers to the anti-dumping questionnaires have been provided within that deadline.
Trdila je torej, da se mora TGO oceniti v trimesečnem roku, kadar so v tem roku predloženi odgovori na vprašalnike o protidampingu.
Otherwise, there is a risk that the information provided in the anti-dumping questionnaire can have an impact on the decision to grant MET.
V nasprotnem primeru bi lahko informacije, navedene v vprašalniku o protidampingu, vplivale na odločitev o odobritvi TGO.
However, in the circumstances of the present case, it should be stressed that a decision on MET could not be taken within the 3 months deadline because most of the information regarding MET was collected during the verification visits which finished beyond the three month deadline.
Vendar je treba pri okoliščinah tega primera poudariti, da odločitve o TGO ni bilo mogoče sprejeti v trimesečnem roku, ker je bila večina informacij v zvezi s TGO zbranih med preveritvenimi obiski, ki so se končali po trimesečnem roku.
In any event, as explained above, the decision to refuse MET to the sample exporting groups was exclusively based on a thorough assessment of the relevant 5 MET criteria laid out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vsekakor je, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, odločitev o zavrnitvi TGO vzorčenim skupinam izvoznikov temeljila izključno na celoviti oceni ustreznih 5 meril za TGO, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In relation to Criterion 1 it has been claimed that there is indeed arbitrage between the Chinese markets and the LME because there have been some minor exports of aluminium to/from China during the Investigation Period.
V zvezi z merilom 1 se je trdilo, da se med kitajskimi trgi in borzo LME dejansko izvaja arbitraža, ker je bilo v obdobju preiskave nekaj aluminija izvoženega na Kitajsko in iz nje.
This argument cannot be accepted in view of divergences of price levels between the Chinese markets and the LME.
Tega argumenta ni mogoče sprejeti zaradi odstopanj pri ravneh cen na kitajskih trgih in borzi LME.
As for Criterion 2 a number of issues were raised regarding some of the incompatibilities with different IAS found by the Commission in the accounts of two companies.
V zvezi z merilom 2 je bilo odprtih veliko vprašanj glede neskladnosti z različnimi MRS, ki jih je Komisija ugotovila v finančnih poročilih dveh družb.
However, nothing in the arguments put forward allow concluding that any of these two companies has a clear set of accounting records independently audited in line with International Accounting Standards.
Vendar na podlagi nobenega od argumentov ni mogoče sklepati, da ima katera od obeh družb jasen sklop računovodskih evidenc, neodvisno revidiranih v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
In relation to Criterion 3 several arguments have been put forward.
V zvezi z merilom 3 je bilo predloženih več argumentov.
First it has been claimed that the impact of financial support, land rights and other advantages such as tax exemptions did not cause significant distortions on the financial situation of the companies.
Najprej se je trdilo, da zaradi vpliva finančne podpore, pravice do rabe zemljišč in drugih prednosti, kot so oprostitve davkov, niso nastala velika izkrivljanja pri finančnem položaju družb.
This argument cannot be accepted since the impact of those schemes is significant if measured in terms of turnover.
Tega argumenta ni mogoče sprejeti, ker je vpliv teh sistemov velik, merjeno v smislu prihodkov od prodaje.
It has also been pointed out that a number of support schemes and fiscal advantages were not company specific and therefore, it cannot be considered that they are the result of a carry-over effect of the non-market economy system.
Prav tako je bilo poudarjeno, da veliko podpornih mehanizmov in davčnih ugodnosti ni bilo značilnih za posamezne družbe, zato ni mogoče šteti, da so nastali s prenosom iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
In this respect, it has to be underlined that the analysis in MET pertains to whether there is State interference whether or not it is specific to any company.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da analiza v TGO obravnava, ali gre za vmešavanje države, ne glede na to, ali je to značilno za katero od družb ali ne.
In any event, the factual basis of the allegation is incorrect.
V vsakem primeru je dejanska podlaga očitka nepravilna.
Indeed, advantages enjoyed by the companies in the present case can be considered as company-specific because they are all targeted to a certain type of companies: e.g.: being a foreign company, being established in a given area and having carried out ad hoc negotiations with the local authorities to receive subsidies, purchasing domestic equipment, technology upgrading, participation on fairs, R&D investments etc.
Prednosti, ki so jih imele družbe v tem primeru, se dejansko lahko štejejo kot značilne za posamezne družbe, ker so bile vse namenjene določeni vrsti družb, npr. tujim družbam, ki so bile ustanovljene na določenem območju in so se priložnostno pogajale z lokalnimi organi v zvezi s prejemanjem subvencij, nakupom domače opreme, posodabljanjem tehnologije, sodelovanjem na sejmih, naložbami v raziskave in razvoj itd.
Finally, it has been put forward that income tax exemptions and deductions for foreign companies that entered into force in 2005 do not constitute a distortion carried over from the non-market economy system.
Končno je bilo izpostavljeno, da oprostitev davka na prihodek in odbitki za tuje družbe, ki so začeli veljati leta 2005, ne pomenijo izkrivljanja, prenesenega iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
This interpretation cannot be accepted.
Te razlage ni mogoče sprejeti.
Indeed, Criterion 3 does not refer to actions limited in time (up to 1998 when China started to apply Market Economy rules) or in their scope, but to actions that imply the involvement of the State in shaping the business environment through measures that are typical of a non-market economy, such as discriminatory tax rates.
Dejansko se merilo 3 ne nanaša na ukrepe, ki bi bili omejeni časovno (do leta 1998, ko je Kitajska začela uporabljati pravila tržnega gospodarstva) ali glede obsega, ampak na ukrepe, ki pomenijo vmešavanje države v oblikovanje poslovnega okolja z ukrepi, ki so značilni za netržno gospodarstvo, kot so diskriminatorne davčne stopnje.
On the basis of the above, none of the PRC companies that had requested MET could show that they fulfilled the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi navedenega nobena od družb iz LRK, ki so zahtevale TGO, ni mogla dokazati, da izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was therefore considered that MET should be rejected for all these companies.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se odobritev TGO zavrne vsem tem družbam.
The Advisory Committee was consulted and did not object to these conclusions.
Opravljeno je bilo posvetovanje s svetovalnim odborom, ki tem sklepnim ugotovitvam ni nasprotoval.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation a country-wide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate, in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, that their export prices and quantities as well as the conditions and terms of the sales are freely determined, that exchange rates are carried out at market rates, and that any State interference is not such as to permit circumvention of measures if exporters are given different rates of duty.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe se za države iz člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe določi morebitna dajatev na ravni države, razen v primerih, kadar lahko družbe v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe dokažejo, da so njihove izvozne cene in količine ter pogoji prodaje prosto oblikovani, da se pretvorbe valut opravljajo po tržnih stopnjah in da vmešavanje države ne omogoča izogibanja ukrepom, če so izvoznikom dodeljene različne stopnje dajatev.
All exporting groups which requested MET also claimed individual treatment in the event they would not be granted MET.
Vse skupine izvoznikov, ki so zahtevale TGO, so zahtevale tudi individualno obravnavo, če jim TGO ne bi bila odobrena.
On the basis of the information available, it is provisionally established that two of the four sampled groups in the PRC meet all the requirements for individual, treatment.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij se začasno ugotavlja, da dve od štirih vzorčenih skupin v LRK izpolnjujeta vse zahteve za individualno obravnavo.