natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus the valuer set the concession fee at EUR […] per year (instead of EUR […] per year, as initially foreseen).
Tako je ocenjevalec določil koncesijsko dajatev v višini […] EUR letno (namesto […] EUR letno, kot je bilo prvotno predvideno).
The valuation is based on two methods, i.e. the comparable transaction approach and the income approach.
Ocena temelji na dveh metodah, tj. na pristopu primerljivih transakcij in dohodkovnem pristopu.
First, the concession contract is benchmarked against three contracts considered as comparable in Ventspils port.
Najprej se koncesijska pogodba primerja s tremi pogodbami, ki se štejejo za primerljive v pristanišču Ventspils.
Taking into consideration the specific features and characteristics of the infrastructure subject to these three contracts, the valuer used correction quotients in order to establish an adequate concession fee.
Ob upoštevanju posebnih lastnosti in značilnosti infrastrukture, ki je predmet teh treh pogodb, je ocenjevalec za določitev ustrezne koncesijske dajatve uporabil korekcijske količnike.
The following factors were taken into account: time and conditions of conclusion of the deal, location, description of the berths, rent area, technical conditions of the infrastructure, access to utilities.
Upoštevani so bili naslednji dejavniki: čas in pogoji za sklenitev posla, lega, opis privezov, zakupljeno zemljišče, tehnični pogoji infrastrukture in dostop do komunalnih storitev.
The concession fee was set to EUR […] per sm per year.
Koncesijska dajatev je bila določena v višini […] EUR na m2 letno.
The income approach, used to assess whether the discounted values of future income enable the coverage of the total investment costs (including dredging and access railways costs), provides for financial projections for a period of 25 years.
Dohodkovni pristop, ki se uporablja za oceno, ali diskontirane vrednosti prihodnjih dohodkov omogočajo pokritje vseh investicijskih stroškov (vključno s stroški izkopa in železniških povezav), omogoča finančne napovedi za obdobje 25 let.
Forecasted income and costs are corrected by a discount rate of 7,5 %, which reflects the investment risk level.
Ocenjeni dohodki in stroški se prilagodijo z diskontno stopnjo 7,5 %, ki odraža stopnjo naložbenega tveganja.
Total investment costs are taken into account, including the public financing.
Upoštevajo se skupni investicijski stroški, vključno z javnim financiranjem.
The independent valuer concluded that the financial indicators justify (the NPV is positive) a concession fee not lower than EUR […] per sm per year for an expected cargo turnover of […] tonnes per year and EUR […] per sm per year for an expected cargo turnover of […] tonnes per year.
Neodvisni ocenjevalec je ugotovil, da finančni kazalniki upravičujejo (NPV je pozitivna) koncesijsko dajatev nad […] EUR na m2 letno pri predvidenem prometu s tovorom […] ton letno in […] EUR na m2 letno pri predvidenem prometu s tovorom […] ton letno.
Given the forecasted volume of […] tonnes per year, the valuer concluded that a concession fee of at least […] EUR per sm per year is justified.
Na podlagi predvidenega obsega v višini […] ton letno je ocenjevalec presodil, da je upravičena koncesijska dajatev najmanj […] EUR na m2 letno.
Taking into account the results of the two methods detailed above, the independent valuer set the concession fee at EUR […] per sm per year.
Ob upoštevanju rezultatov obeh zgoraj opisanih metod je neodvisni ocenjevalec določil koncesijsko dajatev v višini […] EUR na m2 letno.
Thus the appraisal of the independent valuers confirmed the appropriateness of the concession fee set as detailed above, i.e. EUR […] per sm per year.
Tako je ocena neodvisnega ocenjevalca potrdila ustreznost koncesijske dajatve, izračunane v skladu z zgornjim opisom, tj. […] EUR na m2 letno.
THE CONCESSION FEE
KONCESIJSKA DAJATEV
On the basis of the valuations carried out by the independent valuer, the Latvian authorities decided to set the concession fees as follows:
Na podlagi ocen neodvisnega ocenjevalca so se latvijski organi odločili, da določijo koncesijske dajatve, kot je navedeno spodaj:
Concession holder
Koncesionar
Independent valuation
Neodvisna ocena
(per year)
(na leto)
Concession fee
Koncesijska dajatev
Pursuant to 107(1) of the TFEU, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the internal market save as otherwise provided by the TFEU.
Člen 107(1) PDEU določa, da je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica, ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami, razen če PDEU ne določa drugače.
The criteria laid down in Article 107(1) are cumulative.
Pogoji, ki jih določa člen 107(1), so kumulativni.
Therefore, in order to determine whether the notified measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU, all the abovementioned conditions need to be fulfilled.
Če torej želimo ugotoviti, ali priglašeni ukrep pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU, morajo biti izpolnjeni vsi zgoraj navedeni pogoji.
Namely, the financial support:
To pomeni, da je finančna podpora:
is granted by a Member State or through State resources;
dodeljena s strani države članice ali iz državnih sredstev;
favours certain undertakings or the production of certain goods;
daje prednost posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga;
distorts or threatens to distort competition;
izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco;
ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE
EKONOMSKA PREDNOST
According to the case-law [6] of the Court, there is no advantage to the concession holders if a private investor, in similar circumstances, would have set the concession fee at the same level.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča [6] koncesionarji ne bi imeli nobene prednosti, če bi zasebni vlagatelj v podobnih okoliščinah določil enako visoko koncesijsko dajatev.
From the outset, the Commission notes that in this case the concession fees have been established beforehand by means of separate valuations carried out by an external expert.
Komisija že od samega začetka ugotavlja, da so bile v tem primeru koncesijske dajatve določene vnaprej na podlagi ločenih ocen, ki jih je opravil zunanji izvedenec.
The Latvian authorities have provided evidence to the effect that the expert has suitable degree and experience.
Latvijski organi so predložili dokaze, da ima izvedenec ustrezno diplomo in izkušnje.
As detailed above, the independent valuer benchmarked the calculated concession fees with those set for three contracts considered as comparable in Ventspils port.
Kot je podrobno opisano zgoraj, je neodvisni ocenjevalec primerjal izračunane koncesijske dajatve s tistimi, ki so bile določene za tri pogodbe, ki se štejejo za primerljive v pristanišču Ventspils.
Taking into consideration the specific features and characteristics of the infrastructure subject to these contracts, the independent expert used correction quotients in order to establish an adequate concession fee.
Ob upoštevanju posebnosti in značilnosti infrastrukture, ki je predmet teh treh pogodb, je neodvisni ocenjevalec za določitev ustrezne koncesijske dajatve uporabil korekcijske količnike.
Nevertheless, the Commission cannot ascertain, on the basis of the information available whether the contracts considered as reference have been tendered out, nor there is currently any indication that the concession fees paid on the basis of these contracts can be considered a market price.
Kljub temu se Komisija na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij ne more ugotoviti, ali so bile domnevno referenčne pogodbe pridobljene v okviru razpisov, prav tako pa trenutno ni nobenih dokazov, da se koncesijske dajatve, plačljive na podlagi teh pogodb, lahko obravnavajo kot tržna cena.
In the light of the above, the Commission maintains that the benchmarking exercise is not sufficiently reliable and thus cannot be sufficient to exclude that the concession holders will benefit of an advantage.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno Komisija ocenjuje, da primerjava ni dovolj zanesljiva, zato ni mogoče v zadostni meri izključiti dejstva, da bo koncesionarjem zagotovljena prednost.
According to the second method used by the independent valuer, the concession fees and other revenues of the port authority would ensure recovery of the infrastructure investment costs and a certain rate of return in 25 years.
V skladu z drugo metodo, ki jo je uporabil neodvisni ocenjevalec, bi koncesijske dajatve in drugi prihodki pristaniškega organa zagotovili vračilo infrastrukturnih investicijskih stroškov in določeno stopnjo donosa v 25 letih.
The port authority decided to set the concession fee for the dry cargo terminal (EUR […] per sm instead of EUR […] per sm per year) and for berth No 35 (EUR […] instead of EUR […] per year) substantially above the value recommended by the expert.
Pristaniški organ se je odločil, da določi koncesijsko dajatev za terminal za suhi tovor ([…] EUR na m2 namesto […] EUR na m2 letno) in za privez št. 35 ([…] EUR namesto […] EUR letno) precej nad vrednostjo, ki jo je priporočil izvedenec.
Therefore, the actual return expected by the port authority is substantially higher than the value calculated by the expert.
Zato dejanski donos, ki ga pričakuje pristaniški organ, znatno presega vrednost, ki jo je izračunal izvedenec.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that the concession fee and the other revenues of the port authority enable it to recover the entire infrastructure investment costs, including dredging and access railways costs, and earn a return which is in line with the return a private investor would require.
Na podlagi tega Komisija sklepa, da koncesijska dajatev in drugi prihodki pristaniškemu organu omogočajo vračilo celotnih investicijskih stroškov infrastrukture, vključno s stroški izkopa in železniških povezav, poleg tega pa tudi donos, ki je skladen z donosom, kakršnega bi zahteval zasebni vlagatelj.
In addition, the Commission notes that there is no indication in this case that the port authority has set the concession fees at a level that would not maximise its revenues.
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da v tem primeru ni nobenih dokazov, da je pristaniški organ določil koncesijske dajatve na stopnji, ki ne bi povečala njegovih prihodkov.
Furthermore, the inclusion of review clause enables the concession fee to be reviewed periodically.
Poleg tega vključitev klavzule o pregledu omogoča, da se koncesijska dajatev redno pregleduje.
In view of the above, the Commission is of the view that in the present case, it can be concluded that the concession fee established as detailed above does not grant undue advantages to the concession holders of the user-specific infrastructure.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno Komisija meni, da se lahko v obravnavanem primeru sklene, da koncesijska dajatev, kot je opredeljena zgoraj, ne zagotavlja neupravičene prednosti koncesionarjem uporabniško specifične infrastrukture.
This decision in no way prejudges any possible further analysis by the Commission as far as the respect for the EU public procurement rules or other general principles of the TFEU are concerned.
Ta sklep nikakor ne posega v morebitno nadaljnjo analizo Komisije, če se nanaša na spoštovanje pravil EU o javnem naročanju ali drugih splošnih načel, utemeljenih v PDEU.
The Commission considers that the public financing of the user-specific infrastructure in Ventspils port does not result in an economic advantage at the level of the concession holders and the measure does not therefore have the effect of putting the chosen service providers in a more favourable competitive position than the undertakings competing with them.
Komisija meni, da javno financiranje uporabniško specifične infrastrukture v pristanišču Ventspils nima za posledico ekonomske prednosti na ravni koncesionarjev, torej ukrep izbranih ponudnikov storitev ne postavlja v boljši konkurenčni položaj v primerjavi s konkurenčnimi podjetji.
According to settled case-law, for a measure to be classified as State aid, all the conditions set out in Article 107(1) TFEU must be satisfied [7].
Da se ukrep šteje za državno pomoč, morajo biti v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso izpolnjeni vsi pogoji, določeni v členu 107(1) PDEU.
Since the measure to be put in place by the Latvian authorities does not entail an economic advantage for the future concession holders, it does not therefore cumulatively fulfil the conditions required to be considered State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Ukrep, ki ga nameravajo izvesti latvijski organi, prihodnjim koncesionarjem ne zagotavlja ekonomske prednosti, torej kumulativno ne izpolnjuje pogojev, ki se zahtevajo za državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
In light of the above, the Commission concludes that the public financing of the construction of user-specific infrastructure in Ventspils port does not involve aid at the level of the concession holders.
Glede na navedeno je Komisija sklenila, da javno financiranje izgradnje uporabniško specifične infrastrukture v pristanišču Ventspils ne vključuje pomoči na ravni koncesionarjev.
This decision only concerns State aid aspects and is without prejudice to the application of other provisions of TFEU, particularly regarding service concessions,
Ta sklep se nanaša samo na vidike državne pomoči in ne posega v uporabo drugih določb PDEU, zlasti v zvezi s koncesijami za storitve –
The State aid which Latvia is planning to implement in favour of Ventspils port authority in relation to the construction of the dry-bulk terminal, berth No 12 and berth No 35 does not involve State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU at the level of the concession holders.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Latvija namerava izvesti v korist pristaniškega organa Ventspils v zvezi z izgradnjo terminala za suhi razsuti tovor, priveza št. 12 in priveza št. 35, ne vključuje državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU na ravni koncesionarjev.
Implementation of the measure is accordingly authorised.
Izvajanje ukrepa se odobri.
OJ C 62, 13.3.2010, p. 7.
UL C 62, 13.3.2010, str. 7.
Covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Spada v obveznost varovanja poslovne skrivnosti.
Case T-459/93 Siemens v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675, paragraph 48.
Zadeva T-459/93 Siemens SA proti Komisiji, Recueil [1995] II-01675, odstavek 48.
See in that sense also Judgment of 8 July 2010, T-396/08, Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt/Commission, paragraphs 46-48; case C-156/98, Germany v Commission, [1998] ECR I-6857, paragraph 30.
V tem smislu glej tudi sodbo z dne 8. julija 2010, Freistaat Sachsen in dežela Sachsen Anhalt proti Komisiji (T-396/08) (glej odstavke 46–48); zadeva C-156/98, Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil, str. I-6857, odstavek 30.
Joined cases C-328/99 and C-399/00, Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission [2003] ECR I-4053.
Združeni zadevi C-328/99 in C-399/00, Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji [2003] Recueil I-4053.
Joined Cases C-278/92 to C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraph 20; Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraph 68.
Združene zadeve od C-278/92 do C-280/92 Španija proti Komisiji [1994] Recueil I-4103, odstavek 20; zadeva C-482/99 Francija proti Komisiji [2002] Recueil I-4397, odstavek 68.
EXISTING AND NEW TERRITORY OF THE DRY CARGO TERMINAL
OBSTOJEČE IN NOVO ZEMLJIŠČE TERMINALA ZA SUHI TOVOR
SCHEME OF […] LEASED TERRITORY (INCLUDING PLANNED BERTH No 35)
SHEMA […] ZAKUPLJENEGA ZEMLJIŠČA (VKLJUČNO Z NAČRTOVANIM PRIVEZOM št. 35)
TRANSPORTATION SCHEME OF CONSTRUCTION MODULES FROM […] LEASED TERRITORY TO BERTH No 12
SHEMA PREVOZA GRADBENIH MODULOV OD […] ZAKUPLJENEGA ZEMLJIŠČA DO PRIVEZA št. 12
amending Decision 2008/911/EC establishing a list of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products
o spremembi Odločbe 2008/911/ES o vzpostavitvi seznama rastlinskih snovi, pripravkov in kombinacij iz njih za uporabo v tradicionalnih zdravilih rastlinskega izvora
Having regard to the opinion of the European Medicines Agency, formulated on 15 July 2010 by the Committee for Herbal Medicinal Products,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske agencije za zdravila, ki ga je 15. julija 2010 oblikoval Odbor za zdravila rastlinskega izvora,
Hamamelis virginiana L. can be considered as a herbal substance, a herbal preparation or a combination thereof within the meaning of Directive 2001/83/EC and complies with the requirements set out in that Directive.
Hamamelis virginiana L. se lahko šteje za rastlinsko snov, pripravek rastlinskega izvora ali kombinacijo iz njih v smislu Direktive 2001/83/ES in izpolnjuje zahteve iz navedene direktive.
It is therefore appropriate to include Hamamelis virginiana L. in the list of herbal substances, preparations and combinations thereof for use in traditional herbal medicinal products established by Commission Decision 2008/911/EC [2].
Zato je primerno, da se Hamamelis virginiana L. vključi v seznam rastlinskih snovi, pripravkov in kombinacij iz njih za uporabo v tradicionalnih zdravilih rastlinskega izvora, vzpostavljen z Odločbo Komisije 2008/911/ES [2].
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Medicinal Products for Human Use,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za zdravila za uporabo v humani medicini –
Annexes I and II of Decision 2008/911/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Prilogi I in II Odločbe 2008/911/ES se spremenita v skladu s Prilogo k temu sklepu.
‘COMMUNITY LIST ENTRY ON HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA L., FOLIUM ET CORTEX AUT RAMUNCULUS DESTILLATUM
„VPIS V SEZNAM SKUPNOSTI HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA L., FOLIUM ET CORTEX AUT RAMUNCULUS DESTILLATUM
Herbal preparation(s)
Pripravka rastlinskega izvora
Distillate prepared from dried twigs (1:2; extraction solvent ethanol 14-15 %)
Destilat, pripravljen iz suhih vejic (1:2; ekstrakcijsko topilo: 14–15-odstotni etanol)
European pharmacopoeia monograph reference
Sklic na monografijo Evropske farmakopeje
Not applicable
Navedba smiselno ni potrebna.
Indication(s)
Indikaciji
Traditional herbal medicinal product for relief of minor skin inflammation and dryness of the skin.
Tradicionalno zdravilo rastlinskega izvora, ki se uporablja za lajšanje blažjih vnetij kože in težav s suho kožo.
Traditional herbal medicinal product to be used for the temporary relief of eye discomfort due to dryness of the eye or to exposure to wind or sun.
Tradicionalno zdravilo rastlinskega izvora, ki se uporablja za začasno lajšanje težav z očmi zaradi suhosti oči ali izpostavljenosti oči vetru oziroma soncu.
Please see ‘Specified posology’.
Glejte ‚Odmerjanje‘.
Children over six years of age, adolescents, adults and elderly
Otroci, starejši od 6 let, mladostniki, odrasli in starejši bolniki
Distillate in a strength corresponding to 5-30 % in semi-solid preparations, several times daily.
Jakost, ki ustreza 5–30 % destilata v poltrdnih pripravkih, večkrat dnevno.
The use in children under six years of age is not recommended (see section ‘Special warnings and precautions for use’).
Uporaba pri otrocih, mlajših od 6 let, ni priporočljiva (glejte poglavje ‚Posebna opozorila in previdnostni ukrepi‘).
Adolescents, adults and elderly
Mladostniki, odrasli in starejši bolniki
Eye drops Distillate (2) diluted (1:10), 2 drops/each eye, 3-6 times daily.
Kapljice za oko: destilat (2), razredčen (1:10), 2 kapljici/vsako oko, 3- do 6-krat dnevno.
The use in children under 12 years of age is not recommended (see section ‘Special warnings and precautions for use’).
Uporaba pri otrocih, mlajših od 12 let, ni priporočljiva (glejte poglavje ‚Posebna opozorila in previdnostni ukrepi‘).
Ocular use.
Okularna uporaba.
If the symptoms persist longer than two weeks during the use of the medicinal product, a doctor or a qualified healthcare practitioner should be consulted.
Če simptomi med uporabo zdravila ne popustijo po 2 tednih, se je treba posvetovati z zdravnikom ali usposobljenim zdravstvenim delavcem.
The recommended duration of use is four days.
Priporočeno trajanje uporabe je 4 dni.
If the symptoms persist longer than two days during the use of the medicinal product, a doctor or a qualified healthcare practitioner should be consulted.
Če simptomi med uporabo zdravila ne popustijo po 2 dneh, se je treba posvetovati z zdravnikom ali usposobljenim zdravstvenim delavcem.
The use in children under six years of age has not been established due to lack of adequate data.
Zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznih podatkov uporaba pri otrocih, mlajših od 6 let, ni priporočljiva.
If eye pain, changes in vision, continued redness, or irritation of the eye is experienced, or if the condition worsens or persists for more than 48 hours during the use of the medicinal product, a doctor or a qualified healthcare practitioner should be consulted.
Pri občutkih bolečine v očesu, spremembah vida, neprekinjeni rdečini oziroma draženju očesa ali če se med uporabo zdravila stanje poslabša ali traja več kot 48 ur, se je treba posvetovati z zdravnikom ali usposobljenim zdravstvenim delavcem.
The use in children under 12 years of age has not been established due to lack of adequate data.
Zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznih podatkov uporaba pri otrocih, mlajših od 12 let, ni priporočljiva.
For extracts containing ethanol, the appropriate labelling for ethanol, taken from the ‘Guideline on excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use’, must be included.
Za ekstrakte, ki vsebujejo etanol, je treba vključiti ustrezne oznake za etanol, navedene v ‚Smernicah o pomožnih snoveh na ovojnini in v navodilu za uporabo zdravil za uporabo v humani medicini‘.
Allergic contact dermatitis may occur in sensitive patients.
Pri občutljivih bolnikih se lahko pojavi alergijski kontaktni dermatitis.
Conjunctivitis cases have been reported.
Poročali so o primerih konjunktivitisa.
Pharmaceutical particulars [if necessary]
Farmacevtski podatki [če so potrebni]
Pharmacological effects or efficacy plausible on the basis of long-standing use and experience [if necessary for the safe use of the product]
Verjetni farmakološki učinki ali učinkovitost, ugotovljeni na podlagi dolgotrajne uporabe in izkušenj [če je potrebno za varno uporabo zdravila]
According to USP (USP-31- NF 26, 2008 Vol 3:3526).
Po USP (USP-31- NF 26, 2008 3:3526).
The medicinal product complies with the Ph. Eur. monograph on eye preparations (01/2008:1163).’.
Zdravilo je skladno z monografijo Evropske farmakopeje o farmacevtskih oblikah za oko (01/2008:1163).“
of 29 November 2011
z dne 29. novembra 2011
on the safety requirements to be met by European standards for bicycles, bicycles for young children, and luggage carriers for bicycles pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o varnostnih zahtevah, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati evropski standardi za kolesa, kolesa za mlajše otroke in prtljažnike za kolesa v skladu z Direktivo 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Directive 2001/95/EC provides for European standards to be set by European standardisation bodies.
(1) Evropske standarde v skladu z Direktivo 2001/95/ES določajo evropski organi za standardizacijo.
Under Directive 2001/95/EC, a product is to be presumed safe when it meets the voluntary national standards transposing European standards, the references of which were published by the Commission in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V skladu z Direktivo 2001/95/ES se domneva, da je proizvod varen, kadar je v skladu s prostovoljnimi nacionalnimi standardi, ki prevzemajo evropske, sklicevanja na katere je Komisija objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Article 4 of Directive 2001/95/EC lays down the procedure for drawing up European standards.
Člen 4 Direktive 2001/95/ES določa postopek za pripravo evropskih standardov.