natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is particularly obvious in 2007 when production increased while the employment level decreased and the productivity was 21 % higher than in 2006.
To je še zlasti očitno v letu 2007, ko se je proizvodnja povečala, medtem ko se je raven zaposlovanja zmanjšala, produktivnost pa je bila za 21 % višja kot v letu 2006.
The annual average sales prices of the Union producers on the EU market to unrelated customers remained stable between 2006 and 2008 at around 1100 EUR per tonne.
Povprečne letne prodajne cene proizvajalcev Unije na trgu EU za nepovezane stranke so med letoma 2006 in 2008 ostale stabilne pri približno 1100 EUR za tono.
In the IP the annual average sale price decreased by 12 % and reached 977 EUR per tonne.
V OP se je povprečna letna prodajna cena znižala za 12 % in dosegla 977 EUR za tono.
The annual average sales price does not reflect the monthly or even daily price fluctuations of the PET on the European (and world) market, but is considered sufficient to show the trend during the period considered.
Povprečna letna prodajna cena ne odraža mesečnih ali celo dnevnih nihanj cen PET na evropskem (in svetovnem) trgu, vendar se šteje za zadosten pokazatelj trenda med obravnavanim obdobjem.
The sales prices of PET normally follow the price trends of its main raw materials (mainly PTA and MEG) as they constitute up to 80 % of the total cost of PET.
Prodajne cene PET običajno sledijo cenovnim trendom glavnih surovin (večinoma prečiščene tereftalne kisline in monoetilenglikola), saj pomenijo do 80 % celotnega stroška PET.
Unit price EU market (EUR/ton)
Cena na enoto na trgu EU (EUR/tono)
As indicated above, the sales prices of the Union industry were undercut by the subsidised imports from the countries concerned.
Kakor je navedeno, so bile prodajne cene industrije Unije nelojalno znižane zaradi subvencioniranega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
Magnitude of the subsidy margin and recovery from past dumping and subsidisation
Višina stopnje subvencije, okrevanje po preteklem dampingu in subvencioniranje
Given the volume, market share and prices of the imports from the countries concerned, the impact on the Union industry of the actual margins of subsidy cannot be considered to be negligible.
Učinek dejanskih stopenj subvencije na industrijo Unije se glede na obseg, tržni delež in cene uvoza iz zadevnih držav ne more šteti kot zanemarljiv.
It is important to recall that since 2000, there have been anti-dumping measures in force against imports of PET from India, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand and since 2004 against the People’s Republic of China.
Spomniti je treba, da od leta 2000 veljajo protidampinški ukrepi na uvoz PET iz Indije, Indonezije, Republike Koreje, Malezije, Tajvana in Tajske ter od leta 2004 Ljudske republike Kitajske.
There have also been countervailing measures against imports from India since 2000.
Za uvoz iz Indije veljajo izravnalni ukrepi od leta 2000.
Given that in the period considered by this investigation the Union industry lost market share and increased their losses, no actual recovery from the past dumping and subsidisation can be established and it is considered that Union production remains vulnerable to the injurious effect of any subsidised imports in the Union market.
Glede na to, da je v obdobju, na katerega se nanaša ta preiskava, industrija Unije izgubila tržni delež in povečala izgube, ni mogoče ugotoviti okrevanja po preteklem dampingu in subvencioniranju, zato velja, da proizvodnja Unije ostaja občutljiva na škodljiv učinek subvencioniranega uvoza na trg Unije.
The level of closing stocks of the sampled producers decreased between 2006 and the IP by 22 %.
Stopnja končnih zalog vzorčenih proizvajalcev se je med letom 2006 in OP znižala za 22 %.
It is noted that the stocks represent less than 5 % of the annual production and therefore the relevance of this indicator in the injury analysis is limited.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da zaloge pomenijo manj kot 5 % letne proizvodnje, zato je relevantnost tega kazalnika v analizi škode omejena.
Source: questionnaire replies.
Vir: odgovori na vprašalnik.
During the period considered, the profitability of the sampled producers’ sales of the like product on the EU market to unrelated customers, expressed as a percentage of net sales, remained negative and even dropped from – 6,9 % to – 7,5 %.
Dobičkonosnost prodaje podobnega izdelka vzorčenih proizvajalcev na trgu EU nepovezanim strankam, izražena kot odstotek neto prodaje, je v obravnavanem obdobju ostala negativna in se je celo zmanjšala s – 6,9 % na – 7,5 %.
More specifically, the situation with regard to profitability of the sampled producers improved in 2007 when net losses accounted only – 1,5 % of net sales, but losses increased sharply in 2008 to – 9,3 %.
Natančneje, položaj v zvezi z dobičkonosnostjo vzorčenih proizvajalcev se je izboljšal leta 2007, ko je neto izguba znašala samo – 1,5 % neto prodaje, vendar se je v letu 2008 izguba močno povečala na – 9,3 %.
The situation slightly improved in the IP.
Položaj se je nekoliko izboljšal med OP.
Index (2006=-100)
Indeks (2006 = – 100)
The return on investments (‘ROI’), expressed as the profit in percent of the net book value of investments, broadly followed the profitability trend.
Donosnost naložb, izražena kot dobiček v odstotkih neto knjigovodske vrednosti naložb, je na splošno sledila trendu dobičkonosnosti.
Overall, the return on investments remained negative and deteriorated by 2,7 percentage points over the period considered.
Na splošno je donosnost naložb ostala negativna in se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 2,7 odstotne točke.
The net cash flow from operating activities was negative at 18,5 million EUR in 2006. It improved significantly in 2007 when it became positive at 19,5 million EUR, but deteriorated massively in 2008 (– 42 million EUR) before reaching the negative – 11 million EUR in the IP.
Neto denarni tok iz poslovanja je bil v letu 2006 negativen in je znašal 18,5 milijona EUR. Leta 2007, ko je z 19,5 milijona EUR postal pozitiven, se je bistveno izboljšal, vendar se je leta 2008 močno poslabšal (– 42 milijonov EUR), preden je dosegel negativnih – 11 milijonov EUR med OP.
Overall, cash flow improved in the period considered although it remained negative.
Na splošno se je v obravnavanem obdobju denarni tok izboljšal, čeprav je ostal negativen.
There were no indications that the Union industry encountered difficulties in raising capital, mainly due to the fact that some of the producers are incorporated in larger groups.
Zlasti zaradi dejstva, da so nekateri proizvajalci del večjih skupin, ni bilo nobenih pokazateljev, da ima industrija Unije težave pri zbiranju kapitala.
This sharp drop in investments can be partially explained by the fact that in 2006 and 2007 new production lines were acquired aiming at increasing capacity.
Ta velik padec pri naložbah se lahko delno pojasni z dejstvom, da so bile v letih 2006 in 2007 pridobljene nove proizvodne linije z namenom povečanja zmogljivosti.
The analysis of the macroeconomic data show that the Union producers decreased their production and sales during the period considered.
Analiza makroekonomskih podatkov kaže, da so proizvajalci Unije med obravnavanim obdobjem zmanjšali proizvodnjo in prodajo.
Although the observed decrease was not dramatic as such, it needs to be seen in the context of increased demand between 2006 and the IP, which resulted in the Union producers’ market share dropping by 10 percentage points to 75 %.
Čeprav opaženo zmanjšanje ni bilo tako dramatično, ga je treba obravnavati glede na povečano povpraševanje med letom 2006 in OP, kar je povzročilo padec tržnega deleža proizvajalcev Unije za 10 odstotnih točk na 75 %.
At the same time the relevant microeconomic indicators show a clear deterioration of the economic situation of the sampled Union producers.
Hkrati ustrezni mikroekonomski kazalniki kažejo očitno poslabšanje gospodarskega položaja vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
The profitability and return on investment remained negative and they overall declined further between 2006 and the IP.
Dobičkonosnost in donosnost naložb sta ostali negativni in sta se med letom 2006 in OP na splošno še poslabšali.
The cash flow, despite an overall positive development, also remained negative in the IP.
Denarni tok je, kljub splošnemu pozitivnemu razvoju, med OP prav tako ostal negativen.
In the light of the foregoing, it is provisionally concluded that the Union industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 8(4) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno se začasno sklene, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 8(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 8(5) and Article 8(6) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the subsidised imports have caused injury to the Union industry to a degree that enables it to be classified as material.
V skladu s členom 8(5) in (6) osnovne uredbe je Komisija preučila, ali je subvencionirani uvoz povzročili tolikšno škodo industriji Unije, da se jo lahko opredeli kot znatno.
Known factors other than the subsidised imports, which could at the same time have injured the Union industry, were also examined to ensure that possible injury caused by these other factors was not attributed to the subsidised imports.
Poleg subvencioniranega uvoza so bili preučeni tudi drugi znani dejavniki, ki bi lahko prav tako povzročili škodo industriji Unije, da se zagotovi, da se škoda, ki bi jo morda povzročili ti drugi dejavniki, ne bi pripisala subvencioniranemu uvozu.
Between 2006 and the IP, the volume of the subsidised imports of the product concerned increased by more than 5 times to 304200 tonnes, and their market share increased by almost 8 percentage points (from 2,1 % to 10,2 %).
Med letom 2006 in OP se je obseg subvencioniranega uvoza zadevnega izdelka povečal za več kot petkrat na 304200 ton, njegov tržni delež pa se je povečal za skoraj 8 odstotnih točk (z 2,1 % na 10,2 %).
At the same time, the Union industry lost some 10 percentage points of market share (from 84,9 % to 72,1 %).
Istočasno je industrija Unije izgubila približno 10 odstotnih točk tržnega deleža (s 84,9 % na 72,1 %).
The average price of these imports decreased between 2006 and the IP and remained lower than the average price of Union producers.
Povprečna cena tega uvoza se je med letom 2006 in OP znižala in je ostala nižja od povprečne cene proizvajalcev Unije.
As indicated above at recital (217), price undercutting of the subsidised imports was on average 3,2 %.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (217), je subvencionirani uvoz nelojalno nižal prodajne cene v povprečju za 3,2 %.
Even if the price undercutting was below 4 %, it cannot be considered as insignificant given that PET is a commodity and competition takes place mainly via price.
Četudi je bilo nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen manjše od 4 %, ga ni mogoče šteti za zanemarljivega, saj je PET blago in se konkurenca izraža zlasti v ceni.
The Iranian exporter claimed that Iranian PET imports could not have caused material injury to the Union industry in view of the fact that these import levels would only marginally exceed the de minimis threshold for imports.
Iranski izvoznik je trdil, da uvoz PET iz Irana ni mogel povzročiti znatne škode industriji Unije, saj stopnje tega uvoza le neznatno presegajo prag de minimis.
However, during the IP, imports from Iran, corresponding to a market share of 1.9 %, exceeded the de minimis threshold specified in the basic Regulation.
Vendar je med OP uvoz iz Irana, ki ustreza tržnemu deležu v višini 1,9 %, presegel prag de minimis, ki je določen v osnovni uredbi.
In addition, Iranian import prices were undercutting the Union industry’s sales prices.
Poleg tega so iranske uvozne cene nelojalno nižale prodajne cene industrije Unije.
Against this background, the argument raised by the Iranian exporter is rejected.
Na podlagi tega se trditev iranskega izvoznika zavrne.
In view of the undercutting of Union industry’s prices by imports from the countries concerned, it is considered that these subsidised imports exerted a downward pressure on prices, preventing the Union industry from keeping its sales prices to a level that would have been necessary to cover its costs and to realise a profit.
V zvezi z nelojalnim nižanjem prodajnih cen uvoza industrije Unije iz zadevnih držav velja, da je ta subvencionirani uvoz izvajal negativni pritisk na cene, kar je industriji Unije preprečevalo, da svoje prodajne cene zviša do ravni, potrebne za kritje stroškov in ustvarjanje dobička.
Therefore, it is considered that a causal link exists between those imports and the Union industry’s injury.
Zato se šteje, da obstaja jasna vzročna zveza med navedenim uvozom in škodo industrije Unije.
One interested party claimed that any injury was due to the poor export activity of the Union producers.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je škoda nastala zaradi nezadostnega izvoza proizvajalcev Unije.
As it can be seen from the table below, the volume of exports of the Union industry increased during the period considered by 11 %.
Kakor kaže spodnja preglednica, se je obseg izvoza industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 11 %.
The level of export prices over the same period decreased by 10 % which resulted in stable export sales value during the period considered.
Raven izvoznih cen se je v enakem obdobju znižala za 10 %, kar se je odražalo v stabilni vrednosti izvoza v obravnavanem obdobju.
Consequently, there is no indication that the export performance contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Zato ni nobenih dokazov, da je izvozna dejavnost prispevala k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Price of exports (EUR/ton)
Cena izvoza (EUR/tono)
Another interested party claimed that the prices of the Union industry on the EU market were artificially high.
Druga zainteresirana stran je trdila, da so bile cene industrije Unije na trgu EU umetno visoke.
According to the interested party, this claim is evidenced by the fact that prices on the EU market remained stable whereas export sales prices have dropped.
Po mnenju zainteresirane strani je ta trditev dokazana z dejstvom, da so cene na trgu EU ostale stabilne, medtem ko so se izvozne prodajne cene znižale.
However, the investigation has shown that the annual average sales prices of the Union industry on the EU market decreased by 12 % over the period considered, in line with the decrease in export prices over the same period.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da so se v obravnavanem obdobju letne povprečne prodajne cene industrije Unije na trgu EU zmanjšale za 12 % skupaj z znižanjem izvoznih cen v istem obdobju.
The argument is thus rejected.
Trditev se zato zavrne.
The Republic of Korea is subject to anti-dumping duties since 2000.
Za Republiko Korejo veljajo protidampinške dajatve od leta 2000.
However, two Korean companies are subject to a zero duty and the investigation established that imports from the Republic of Korea remain at a high level and increased significantly in the period considered.
Vendar za dve korejski družbi veljajo nične dajatve in preiskava je pokazala, da uvoz iz Republike Koreje ostaja visok, v obravnavanem obdobju pa se je znatno povečal.
The Korean imports increased by almost 150 % between 2006 and the IP and their corresponding market share increased from 3,5 % in 2006 to 7,7 % in the IP.
Korejski uvoz se je med letom 2006 in OP povečal za skoraj 150 %, njegov pripadajoči tržni delež pa se je povečal s 3,5 % v letu 2006 na 7,7 % med OP.
The average price of the Korean imports remained in general slightly below the average prices of the Union producers.
Povprečna cena korejskega uvoza je na splošno ostala nekoliko pod povprečnimi cenami proizvajalcev Unije.
However, the Korean prices were higher than the average prices from the countries concerned.
Vendar so bile korejske cene višje od povprečnih cen zadevnih držav.
Consequently, although it cannot be excluded that imports from the Republic of Korea contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry, their contribution was only limited and they are considered not to have broken the causal link established as regards the subsidised imports from the countries concerned.
Čeprav ni mogoče izvzeti, da je uvoz iz Republike Koreje prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, je njegov prispevek omejen in šteje se, da ni prekinil vzročne zveze, vzpostavljene v zvezi s subvencioniranim uvozom iz zadevnih držav.
The Iranian exporter claimed that any increase in Iranian imports was due to a decline in South Korean imports and therefore was not at the expense of European producers.
Iranski izvoznik je trdil, da se je iranski uvoz povečal zaradi zmanjšanja uvoza iz Severne Koreje, zato ni bremenil evropskih proizvajalcev.
However, Eurostat data show that, over the period considered, import volumes from both countries have been increasing steadily in parallel.
Vendar podatki Eurostata kažejo, da se je v obravnavanem obdobju obseg uvoza iz obeh držav hkrati enakomerno povečeval.
Hence, it can not be concluded that imports from Iran merely substituted imports from South Korea.
Zato ni mogoče skleniti, da je uvoz iz Irana le nadomestil uvoz iz Severne Koreje.
Imports from other countries were, on average, at prices substantially higher than average sales prices of the Union producers.
Uvoz iz drugih držav je bil v povprečju izveden po cenah, ki so bistveno višje od povprečnih prodajnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
In addition, these imports have lost market share in the period considered.
Poleg tega je ta uvoz v obravnavanem obdobju izgubil tržni delež.
Consequently, these imports are not considered as being a possible cause of injury for the Union industry.
Zato tega uvoza ni mogoče obravnavati kot morebitnega vzroka škode za industrijo Unije.
Competition from the non-cooperating producers in the Union
Konkurenca nesodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije
Some interested parties claimed that the injury suffered by the Union industry would be due to competition form the non-cooperating producers in the Union.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, nastala zaradi konkurence nesodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije.
One of them stopped its production already in the IP while two other ones did so shortly thereafter.
Eden je ustavil proizvodnjo že med OP, dva druga pa sta to storila kmalu po tem.
Based on the information available it appears that these producers lost their market share during the period considered from 20,5 % in 2006 to 16 % in the IP.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij se zdi, da so ti proizvajalci med obravnavanim obdobjem izgubili svoj tržni delež, ki se je z 20,5 % leta 2006 zmanjšal na 16 % med OP.
The investigation has not shown any evidence that the behaviour of these producers has broken the causal link between the subsidised imports and the injury established for the Union industry.
Preiskava ni pokazala nobenih dokazov, da je ravnanje teh proizvajalcev prekinilo vzročno zvezo med subvencioniranim uvozom in škodo, ugotovljeno za industrijo Unije.
Source: complaint.
Vir: pritožba.
Economic downturn
Gospodarski upad
The financial and economic crisis of 2008 led to a market growth that was slower than expected and unusual as compared to the beginning of the years 2000 where yearly growth rates around 10 % could be observed.
Zaradi finančne in gospodarske krize v letu 2008 je bila rast trga počasnejša od pričakovane in nenavadna v primerjavi s prvimi leti tega tisočletja, ko so bile letne stopnje rasti okrog 10 %.
However, the negative effect of the economic downturn and the contraction in demand was exacerbated by the increased subsidised imports from the countries concerned, which undercut the prices of the Union industry.
Vendar pa se je negativen učinek gospodarskega upada in zmanjšanja povpraševanja stopnjeval zaradi povečanega subvencioniranega uvoza iz zadevnih držav, ki je nelojalno nižal prodajne cene industrije Unije.
Even if the economic downturn could therefore be considered as contributing to the injury for the period starting in the last quarter of 2008, this cannot in any way diminish the damaging injurious effects of low priced subsidised imports in the EU market over the whole period considered.
Četudi bi se za gospodarski upad lahko štelo, da je prispeval k škodi v obdobju od zadnje četrtine leta 2008, to nikakor ne more zmanjšati škodljivih učinkov poceni subvencioniranega uvoza na trg EU v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
Even in a situation of decreasing sales, the Union industry should be able to maintain an acceptable level of prices and therefore limit the negative effects of any decrease in the growth of consumption, but only in the absence of the unfair competition of low priced imports in the market.
Industrija Unije bi morala tudi med zmanjševanjem obsega prodaje ohranjati ustrezno raven cen in tako omejiti negativne učinke zmanjšanja rasti potrošnje, vendar le, če na trgu ne bi bilo nepoštene konkurence poceni uvoza.
The economic downturn has also no impact whatsoever on the injury suffered and observed already before the last quarter of 2008.
Gospodarski upad tudi ni imel nobenega vpliva na škodo, že povzročeno in ugotovljeno pred zadnjo četrtino leta 2008.
Consequently, the economic downturn must be considered as an element contributing to the injury suffered by the Union industry as from last quarter of 2008 only and given its global character cannot be considered as a possible cause breaking the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the subsidised imports from the countries concerned.
Zato je treba gospodarski upad šteti za element, ki je prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije samo od zadnje četrtine leta 2008, in ga, glede na njegovo globalno naravo, ni mogoče obravnavati kot mogočega vzroka prekinitve vzročne zveze med škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in subvencioniranim uvozom iz zadevnih držav.
Geographical location
Geografski položaj
Some interested parties argued that any injury suffered by the Union industry would be caused in the first place by the unfavourable location of at least some Union producers (i.e. far away from a harbour thus incurring additional unnecessary transportation costs for the raw materials as well as for the final product).
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je bila škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, predvsem posledica neugodnega položaja vsaj nekaterih proizvajalcev Unije (tj. daleč od pristanišča, zaradi česar so imeli dodatne nepotrebne stroške pri prevozu surovin in končnega izdelka).
As regards the above argument, it is recognised that being located in a place not easily accessible by relatively cheaper means of transport has certain disadvantages in terms of cost for the delivery of both raw materials from the suppliers and the final product to the customers.
Glede navedene trditve se ugotavlja, da ima nahajanje na mestu, ki ni lahko dostopno z sorazmerno cenejšimi prevoznimi sredstvi, določene slabosti glede stroškov dobave surovin od dobaviteljev in končnega izdelka strankam.
However, the investigation and the verified data from the sampled Union producers (two of them located close to a harbour and two further inland) did not show any significant correlation between the geographical location and the economic performance of the Union producers.
Vendar preiskava in preverjeni podatki vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije (dva sta blizu pristanišča in dva bolj v notranjosti) niso pokazali nobene pomembne vzročne povezave med geografskim položajem in gospodarsko uspešnostjo proizvajalcev Unije.
In fact, the injury found applied also to those producers located close to a harbour.
Pravzaprav je ugotovljena škoda veljala tudi za proizvajalca blizu pristanišča.
Consequently, it is concluded that geographical location did not materially contribute to the injury suffered by the Union industry to a material extent.
Zato se sklene, da geografski položaj ni bistveno prispeval k škodi, ki jo je v znatnem obsegu utrpela industrija Unije.