natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Their arguments cannot be accepted: first, because comments arrived well beyond the legal deadline to submit comments on the choice of the analogue country (the deadline expired on 24 August 2009) and second, because they cannot be taken into consideration from a substantial point of view.
Teh argumentov ni mogoče sprejeti: prvič, ker so pripombe prispele precej po uradnem roku za predložitev pripomb o izbiri primerljive države (rok se je iztekel 24. avgusta 2009), in drugič, ker se ne morejo upoštevati z bistvenega vidika.
The arguments can be summarized as follows:
Argumenti se lahko povzamejo:
One of the cooperating companies in Turkey (Hayes Lemmerz) is related to an EU producer and both cooperating companies are members of EUWA (the association representing European producers which has submitted the complaint).
Ena od sodelujočih družb v Turčiji (Hayes Lemmerz) je povezana s proizvajalcem EU in obe sodelujoči družbi sta članici EUWA (združenja, ki zastopa evropske proizvajalce, ki so predložili pritožbo).
This cannot be accepted.
Tega ni mogoče sprejeti.
Indeed, the fact that one of the companies in the Analogue country is related to an EU company and that both companies are members of the same association as the complainants cannot be considered a relevant criteria to exclude Turkey as analogue country given that the criteria to be taken into account when analysing the appropriateness of an analogue country have to be based exclusively on facts such as the degree of competition in the domestic market of the analogue country and the non-existence of significant differences in the production process between producers in the analogue country and the Non-Market-Economy exporter.
Dejstvo, da je ena družba v primerljivi državi povezana z družbo EU in da sta obe družbi članici istega združenja kot pritožniki, res ne more šteti kot ustrezno merilo, da se Turčija izključi kot primerljiva država, glede na to, da morajo merila, ki se upoštevajo pri analizi ustreznosti primerljive države, temeljiti izključno na dejstvih, kot je stopnja konkurenčnosti domačega trga primerljive države in odsotnost pomembnih razlik v proizvodnih procesih med proizvajalci v primerljivi državi in netržnim izvoznikom.
It has also been argued that the production process in China is not comparable to Turkey because Chinese companies have access to cheaper raw material.
Trdilo se je tudi, da proizvodni proces na Kitajskem ni primerljiv s turškim, ker imajo kitajske družbe dostop do cenejših surovin.
This claim cannot be taken into account.
Te trditve se ne da upoštevati.
On the one hand, access to cheaper aluminium is due to a distortion on prices caused by State interference.
Po eni strani je vzrok za dostop do cenejšega aluminija v izkrivljanju cen, kar povzroča država z vmešavanjem.
As explained above, the PRC benefits from a unique world position in terms of access to the cheapest possible prices for raw materials and no comparable situation can be found in other countries.
Kot je razloženo zgoraj, ima LRK korist od edinstvenega položaja na svetu v smislu dostopa do najcenejših možnih cen surovin in v nobeni drugi državi ni mogoče najti primerljivega položaja.
On the other hand, the investigation has shown that the production process is practically identical in China and in Turkey.
Po drugi strani pa je preiskava pokazala, da je proizvodni proces na Kitajskem in v Turčiji praktično enak.
Finally, it has been claimed that there is insufficient competition at domestic level because domestic production is mainly used for exports and there are entry barriers to imports from outside the EU.
Končno, trdilo se je, da na domači ravni ni dovolj konkurence, ker se domača proizvodnja uporablja predvsem za izvoz in ker obstajajo ovire za uvoz iz držav zunaj EU.
These claims cannot be taken into consideration.
Teh trditev se ne da upoštevati.
Indeed, the EU market is much more than six times larger than the Turkish market and there are no barriers to entry; it is therefore reasonable that Turkey sends to the EU a significant part of its production.
Trg EU je resnično precej več kot šestkrat večji od turškega in ovir za vstop ni; zato je razumljivo, da Turčija pošilja v EU znaten del svoje proizvodnje.
Moreover, there is sufficient competition in the domestic Turkish market because there are at least five domestic producers and there are not barriers to imports from the EU.
Poleg tega obstaja zadostna konkurenca na domačem turškem trgu, ker je tam najmanj pet domačih proizvajalcev in ni nobenih ovir za uvoz iz EU.
Having regard to the above, the provisional conclusion that Turkey is an appropriate and reasonable analogue country, as set out in recital (63) of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjega se potrdi začasna sklepna ugotovitev, da je Turčija ustrezna in smiselno primerljiva država, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (63) začasne uredbe.
Two exporting producers have contested the provisional findings as set out in recitals (57) to (77) of the provisional Regulation.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta nasprotovala začasnim ugotovitvam, navedenim v uvodnih izjavah od (57) do (77) začasne uredbe.
It has been claimed that, according to Article 2(11) of the basic Anti-dumping regulation, dumping calculations should be based on ‘all export transactions to the Community’; in other words, they consider that 100 % of the transactions should be taken into consideration when calculating dumping margins.
Trdila sta, da bi morali izračuni dampinga v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne protidampinške uredbe temeljiti na „vseh izvoznih transakcijah pri izvozu v Skupnost“; z drugimi besedami, menita, da bi bilo treba pri izračunu stopenj dampinga upoštevati 100 % transakcij.
It has been also argued that the most expensive transactions, in particular for one of the companies investigated, have not been taken into account when calculating dumping margins.
Trdila sta tudi, da najdražje transakcije, zlasti pri eni od preiskanih družb, niso bile upoštevane pri izračunu stopenj dampinga.
In relation to the argument regarding the number of transactions to be taken into account, it has to be pointed out that Article 2(11) of the basic Anti-dumping Regulation establishes that dumping calculations should be based on ‘all export transactions to the Community’ but they should be ‘Subject to the relevant provisions governing fair comparison’.
V zvezi z argumentom glede števila transakcij, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati, je treba poudariti, da člen 2(11) osnovne protidampinške uredbe določa, da bi morali izračuni dampinga temeljiti na „vseh izvoznih transakcijah pri izvozu v Skupnost“, vendar „ob upoštevanju zadevnih določb, ki urejajo pošteno primerjavo“.
This means that, if it is impossible to reach a reasonable matching for 100 % of the products, it will not be possible to take into account 100 % of the export transactions.
To pomeni, da v primeru, kadar ni mogoče doseči razumnega ujemanja za 100 % izdelkov, ni mogoče upoštevati 100 % izvoznih transakcij.
This is considered reasonable provided the calculations are based on a sufficiently large percentage of total export transactions.
To se šteje kot smiselno pod pogojem, da izračuni temeljijo na dovolj velikem odstotku skupnih izvoznih transakcij.
In the present case, around 85 % of the transactions were taken into account.
V tem primeru je bilo upoštevanih okrog 85 % transakcij.
Concerning the claim that the most expensive transactions have not taken into account, a new dumping calculation has been made in order to take them into consideration.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da niso bile upoštevane najdražje transakcije, je bil pripravljen nov izračun dampinga z namenom, da se upoštevajo.
An additional number of product types have been added to the ones used for the calculation made at provisional level.
Dodatno število vrst izdelkov je bilo dodano k tistim, ki so bili že uporabljeni za izračun na začasni ravni.
This has allowed to include in the calculations as many transactions as possible, also ensuring that the weighted average unit price of all export transactions per exporting company is as close as possible to the weighted average unit price of export transactions (of this company) which has been used to calculate the dumping margin.
S tem je bilo mogoče v izračune vključiti čim večje število transakcij in zagotoviti tudi, da je bila tehtana povprečna cena na enoto vseh izvoznih transakcij na izvozno družbo čim bližja tehtani povprečni ceni na enoto izvoznih transakcij (te družbe), ki so bile uporabljene za izračun stopnje dampinga.
In this way, the value of all export transactions, even the most expensive ones, has been considered.
Na ta način je bila upoštevana vrednost vseh izvoznih transakcij, tudi najdražjih.
Normal values for these additional product types have been calculated following the methodology explained in recital (70) of the provisional Regulation.
Normalne vrednosti za te dodatne vrste izdelkov so bile izračunane po metodologiji, ki je razložena v uvodni izjavi (70) začasne uredbe.
With this new calculation dumping margins have decreased in particular for YHI.
S tem novim izračunom so se stopnje dampinga zmanjšale, zlasti za YHI.
The methodology followed for the determination of Normal Value, Export Price and Comparison is the same as the one described in recitals (64) to (75) of the provisional Regulation.
Metodologija, upoštevana pri določitvi normalne vrednosti, izvozne cene in primerjave, je enaka tisti, ki je opisana v uvodnih izjavah od (64) do (75) začasne uredbe.
The only changes for the new calculations concern the increase of the number of transactions taken into account and the consideration that the average price of the export transactions used for the calculation of dumping for any given company should not be substantially different from the average export price of all transactions of this company.
Edine spremembe pri novih izračunih se nanašajo na povečanje števila upoštevanih transakcij in mnenje, da povprečna cena izvoznih transakcij, uporabljenih za izračun dampinga za katero koli družbo, ne bi smela biti bistveno drugačna od povprečne izvozne cene vseh transakcij te družbe.
It has been claimed that the analysis of the Commission does not take into consideration the evolution of exchange rates, in particular the appreciation of the American Dollar over the Euro, and of costs of primary aluminium and international freight.
Trdilo se je, da analiza Komisije ne upošteva razvoja menjalnih tečajev, predvsem povečane vrednosti ameriškega dolarja v primerjavi z evrom, in stroškov primarnega aluminija ter mednarodnega prevoza.
This allegation is not grounded, as the Commission services, according to their practices, have included all types of verifiable costs in their analysis of the market of the product concerned during the IP.
Ta trditev ni utemeljena, saj so službe Komisije v skladu s svojimi praksami vključile v analizo trga zadevnega izdelka v obdobju preiskave vse vrste preverljivih stroškov.
The Chinese producer YHI claimed that the computation of allowances in its individual dumping calculation was inaccurate.
Kitajski proizvajalec YHI je trdil, da je bil izračun popravka v njegovem individualnem izračunu dampinga netočen.
The Commission accepted this claim and performed a new calculation, which gave a dumping margin result of 23,81 %, i.e. 2,14 % less than what previously calculated.
Komisija je to trditev sprejela in izvedla ponoven izračun, po katerem je stopnja dampinga 23,81 %, tj. za 2,14 % manj od prvotnega izračuna.
The Commission received comments on the provisional findings concerning injury.
Komisija je prejela pripombe o začasnih ugotovitvah v zvezi s škodo.
Some of those comments were a repetition of comments already addressed in the provisional Regulation.
Nekatere od teh pripomb so bile ponovljene pripombe, ki so se že obravnavale v začasni uredbi.
Arguments already addressed in the provisional Regulation are not repeated in this Regulation.
Argumenti, ki so bili obravnavani že v začasni uredbi, se ne ponavljajo v tej uredbi.
Parties claimed that the methodology of calculating imports has not been sufficiently explained.
Strani so trdile, da metodologija izračunavanja uvoza ni bila dovolj razložena.
Those criticisms, however, have not been substantiated.
Te kritike pa niso utemeljene.
It is recalled that at the provisional stage the methodology was based on the complaint but cross-checked with other sources (data provided by cooperating producers, users, exporters).
Treba je opozoriti, da je metodologija na začasni stopnji temeljila na pritožbi, vendar se je navzkrižno preverjala pri drugih virih (podatki, ki so jih zagotovili sodelujoči proizvajalci, uporabniki, izvozniki).
In view of parties’ comments these data have been analyzed once again and the provisional conclusions are hereby confirmed.
Glede na pripombe strani so se ti podatki še enkrat analizirali in začasne sklepne ugotovitve se potrdijo.
It is recalled that three notes providing detailed information on methods of calculation of production, imports and sales were included in the file open for consultation by interested parties on the day of publication of provisional Regulation.
Treba je opozoriti, da so bila v dokumentacijo, odprto za posvetovanje zainteresiranih strani, na dan objave začasne uredbe vključena tri obvestila s podrobnimi informacijami o načinih izračuna proizvodnje, uvoza in prodaje.
Because the CN codes covered by the present investigation contain also other products than the product concerned, most of the comments concerned the methodology used by the Commission to exclude product non-concerned from the volumes reported.
Ker oznake KN, zajete v to preiskavo, vključujejo tudi druge izdelke razen zadevnega, se je večina pripomb nanašala na metodologijo, ki jo je Komisija uporabila za izključitev izdelka, ki ni zadevni izdelek, iz obsega v poročilu.
CN code 87087050 covers aluminium wheels and parts and accessories thereof, of aluminium.
Oznaka KN 87087050 zajema aluminijasta kolesa, njihove dele in pribor iz aluminija.
Corresponding data were extracted in tonnes from Comext without any further adjustment at this stage, assuming, as suggested in the complaint, that parts and accessories are of minor importance.
Ustrezni podatki so bili izpisani iz Comexta v tonah, na tej stopnji brez dodatnih popravkov, ob predpostavki, kot je bilo nakazano v pritožbi, da so deli in pribor manj pomembni.
CN code 87087010 covers, inter alia, aluminium wheels and parts and accessories thereof, of aluminium.
Oznaka KN 87087010 med drugim zajema aluminijasta kolesa, njihove dele in pribor iz aluminija.
Here also, corresponding data extracted in tonnes from Comext were duly adjusted in accordance with the methodology described in the complaint.
Tudi tu so bili ustrezni podatki, izpisani iz Comexta v tonah, primerno prilagojeni v skladu z metodologijo, opisano v pritožbi.
Comments submitted by parties were in great part critical of this approach without however suggesting a more suitable or reliable alternative.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložile strani, so bile v veliki meri kritične do tega pristopa, vendar niso predlagale primernejše ali zanesljivejše alternative.
The criticisms related mainly to the fact that parties, unaware of which method the Commission was about to apply could not comment.
Te kritike so se nanašale v glavnem na dejstvo, da strani, ki niso vedele, katero metodo bo Komisija uporabila, niso mogle dati pripomb.
It is recalled that the non-confidential version of the complaint, setting out in a detailed manner the exclusion methodology, was available in the non-confidential file as from the initiation of the proceeding.
Treba je spomniti, da je bila nezaupna različica pritožbe, ki je podrobno navajala metodologijo izločanja, na voljo v nezaupni dokumentaciji od začetka postopka.
The Commission cross checked the data provided in the complaint and could not establish anything that would undermine the reasonableness of the method chosen.
Komisija je navzkrižno preverjala podatke, dane v pritožbi, in ni mogla ugotoviti ničesar, kar bi zmanjšalo smiselnost izbrane metode.
Further, in view of the fact that parties did not propose an alternative method of exclusion, their comments were considered as unsubstantiated.
Nadalje, glede na dejstvo, da strani niso predlagale alternativne metode izločanja, so se njihove pripombe štele za neutemeljene.
A second set of comments related to the method of conversion of volumes initially expressed in tonnes into units for the two CN codes.
Drugi niz pripomb se je nanašal na metodo pretvorbe obsega za obe oznaki KN, ki je bil sprva izražen v tonah, v enote.
Here again the Commission followed the method suggested in the complaint and subsequently corroborated by the questionnaire replies of Chinese exporters.
Tudi tu je Komisija uporabila metodo, ki je bila predlagana v pritožbi in pozneje potrjena v odgovorih kitajskih izvoznikov na vprašalnik.
Such methodology suggests that the average weight per unit imported from China is around 9 kg per wheel.
Ta metodologija kaže, da je povprečna teža na enoto, uvoženo iz Kitajske, okrog 9 kg na kolo.
The unit weight of products imported from other third countries has been estimated at around 10 kg per unit in accordance with the complaint but cross checked with available information received during the present investigation from different parties.
Teža enote izdelkov, uvoženih iz drugih tretjih držav, je ocenjena na okrog 10 kg na enoto v skladu s pritožbo, vendar navzkrižno preverjena z razpoložljivimi informacijami, pridobljenimi od različnih strani v tej preiskavi.
In their post-provisional submissions parties claimed that 10 instead of 9 kg should be used as an average weight as this would be the average weight of imported OEM wheels.
Strani so po začasnih ugotovitvah dostavile zahteve, da bi bilo treba kot povprečno težo uporabiti 10 kg namesto 9 kg, ker naj bi bila to povprečna teža uvoženih koles OEM.
As specified in the provisional Regulation, the average weight of 9 kg has been based on data provided by the sampled exporting producers.
Kot je določeno v začasni uredbi, povprečna teža 9 kg temelji na podatkih, ki so jih zagotovili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki.
Therefore it is concluded that it is the most reasonable method of conversion reflecting the average weight of Chinese imports.
Torej se sklene, da je to najbolj smiselna metoda pretvorbe, ki odraža povprečno težo kitajskega uvoza.
In any case, conversion based on 10 kg for OEM wheels showed that there would be no impact on final conclusions.
Vsekakor je pretvorba na podlagi 10 kg za kolesa OEM pokazala, da to ne bi vplivalo na končne sklepne ugotovitve.
The conclusions in recitals (86) to (88) in the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve v uvodnih izjavah od (86) do (88) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
Volume and prices of imports from the PRC
Obseg in cene uvoza iz LRK
The conclusions drawn from, i.a., Eurostat data reported in recitals (86) and (89) of the provisional Regulation have been confirmed by the questionnaire replies of the exporting producers.
Sklepne ugotovitve, pridobljene med drugim iz podatkov Eurostata, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (86) in (89) začasne uredbe, so bile potrjene v odgovorih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na vprašalnik.
Given that the data emanates from different sources, naturally the trends may differ slightly depending on the segment and company.
Glede na to, da podatki izhajajo iz različnih virov, je razumljivo, da se lahko trendi rahlo razlikujejo glede na področje in družbo.
In any event, they confirmed low price levels which combined with the high undercutting levels and steep increase in volumes of imports from the PRC, stresses the accuracy of the overall conclusion in this case.
Vsekakor so potrdili nizke ravni cen, ki v kombinaciji z visokimi stopnjami nelojalnega nižanja in občutnim povečevanjem obsega uvoza iz LRK poudarjajo točnost splošne ugotovitve v tem primeru.
Data and trends have also been checked for OEM and AM segments considered separately.
Podatki in trendi so bili preverjeni za obravnavani področji OEM in AM, za vsako posebej.
The provisional regulation mistakenly stated in recital (89) that prices for years 2006 to 2008 had to be based on Eurostat because the exporters’ questionnaires did not provide relevant data.
V začasni uredbi je v uvodni izjavi (89) zmotno navedeno, da morajo cene za leta od 2006 do 2008 temeljiti na podatkih Eurostata, ker vprašalniki izvoznikov niso zagotovili ustreznih podatkov.
The statement should have related to a split between OEM and AM transactions.
Izjava bi se morala nanašati na razdelitev med transakcije OEM in AM.
The split can only be established on the basis of transaction-by-transaction listings provided by exporters.
Razdelitev se lahko vzpostavi samo na podlagi seznama posamično navedenih transakcij, ki ga zagotovijo izvozniki.
As for AM unit prices data shows a more or less flat levels with a slight increase at the end of the period.
Glede cen na enoto AM so podatki bolj ali manj stabilni z rahlim povečanjem na koncu obdobja.
They ranged from 25 to 34 EUR in 2006, from 24 to 32 EUR in 2007, from 25 to 29 EUR in 2008 and from 26 to 36 EUR in the IP.
Gibale so se od 25 do 34 EUR v letu 2006, od 24 do 32 EUR v letu 2007, od 25 do 29 EUR v letu 2008 in od 26 do 36 EUR v OP.
For confidentiality reasons those ranges have been modified upwards or downwards by 15 % at maximum.
Iz zaupnih razlogov so se ti razponi spremenili navzgor ali navzdol za največ 15 %.
Price range for China AM imports (based on sample of exporters)
Cenovni razpon za kitajski uvoz AM (ki temelji na vzorcu izvoznikov)
OEM unit prices of imports from the PRC show a decrease of more than 15 % over the period considered.
Cena na enoto uvoza OEM iz LRK kaže zmanjšanje za več kot 15 % v obravnavanem obdobju.
Further details cannot be disclosed due to confidentiality reasons as explained in the section on the calculation of the injury elimination level below.
Nadaljnje podrobnosti se ne morejo razkriti zaradi zaupnosti, kot je razloženo v spodnjem poglavju o izračunu stopenj odprave škode.
One party claimed that the Chinese import prices increased between 2008 and the IP when most of the injury indicators suffered from a significant decline.
Ena stran je trdila, da so se kitajske uvozne cene povečale med letom 2008 in OP, ko je večina kazalnikov škode utrpela znatno znižanje.
Indeed there has been a nominal increase of Chinese import prices (although by only 1,6 %) [7].
V resnici je šlo za nominalno povečanje kitajskih uvoznih cen (čeprav zgolj za 1,6 %) [7].
It has to be stressed however that over the entirety of the period considered they decreased by 8 %.
Treba pa je poudariti, da so se v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju cene zmanjšale za 8 %.
Overall, low price levels have been confirmed for both segments, which combined with high undercutting and steep increase of imports from the PRC confirms the conclusions in this case.
V celoti so bile nizke ravni cen potrjene na obeh področjih, kar v kombinaciji z visokimi stopnjami nelojalnega nižanja in občutnim povečanjem uvoza iz LRK potrjuje sklepne ugotovitve v tem primeru.
Separate injury analysis for OEM and AM segments
Ločena analiza škode za področji OEM in AM
One of the main comments received after the imposition of provisional measures was that a separate analysis of all injury indicators for OEM and AM segments should have been conducted.
Ena od glavnih pripomb, prejetih po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov, je bila, da bi bilo treba opraviti ločeno analizo vseh kazalnikov škode za področji OEM in AM.
One party referred in that regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1888/2006 [8] as well as Council Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 [9] concerning imports of sweetcorn originating in Thailand, claiming that such segment-specific analysis was conducted there.
Ena stran se je v tem smislu sklicevala na to, da Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1888/2006 [8] pa tudi Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 682/2007 [9] o uvozu sladke koruze s poreklom iz Tajske trdita, da je bila taka analiza tam opravljena posebej za področje.
That party further claimed that by not following the sweetcorn case the Commission was in breach of WTO requirements.
Navedena stran je nadalje trdila, da je Komisija s tem, ko se ni zgledovala po primeru sladke koruze, kršila zahteve STO.