natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following submission of the draft assessment reports by the rapporteur Member States, it has been found to be necessary to request further information from the applicants and to have the rapporteur Member States examine that information and submit their assessment.
Po predložitvi osnutkov poročil o oceni držav članic poročevalk je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba od vlagateljev zahtevati nadaljnje informacije, ki jih morata državi članici poročevalki pregledati in nato predložiti svojo oceno.
As the evaluation so far has not identified any reason for immediate concern, Member States should be given the possibility of prolonging provisional authorisations granted for plant protection products containing the active substances concerned for a period of 24 months in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC so as to enable the examination of the dossiers to continue.
Ker dosedanja ocena še ni razkrila razlogov za takojšnjo skrb, je treba državam članicam v skladu z določbami člena 8 Direktive 91/414/EGS zagotoviti možnost podaljšanja za 24 mesecev začasnih registracij za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo zadevne aktivne snovi, in tako omogočiti nadaljnje pregledovanje dokumentacij.
It is expected that the evaluation and decision-making process with respect to a decision on a possible inclusion in Annex I to that Directive for Candida oleophila strain O, potassium iodide and potassium thiocyanate will have been completed within 24 months.
Pričakuje se, da bosta ocena in postopek odločanja o morebitni vključitvi Candida oleophila, sev O, kalijevega jodida in kalijevega tiocianata v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi zaključena v 24 mesecih.
Member States may extend provisional authorisations for plant protection products containing Candida oleophila strain O, potassium iodide or potassium thiocyanate for a period ending on 31 August 2012 at the latest.
Države članice lahko podaljšajo začasne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi Candida oleophila, sev O, kalijev jodid ali kalijev tiocianat, najpozneje do 31. avgusta 2012.
This Decision shall expire on 31 August 2012.
Ta sklep preneha veljati 31. avgusta 2012.
OJ L 141, 2.6.2007, p. 78.
UL L 141, 2.6.2007, str. 78.
Decision No 458/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep št. 458/2010/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 by removing funding for certain Community actions and altering the limit for funding such actions
o spremembi Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 glede ukinitve financiranja nekaterih ukrepov Skupnosti ter spremembe omejitve njihovega financiranja
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 78(2) Pogodbe,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure [1],
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom [1],
The policy of the Union on the Common European Asylum System (the CEAS) is designed, under the terms of the Hague Programme, to establish a common asylum area by means of an effective harmonised procedure consistent with the values and humanitarian tradition of the European Union.
Politika Unije o skupnem evropskem azilnem sistemu (CEAS) naj bi ob upoštevanju določb haaškega programa vzpostavila skupno azilno območje z učinkovitim usklajenim postopkom v skladu z vrednotami in humanitarno tradicijo Evropske unije.
Much progress has been made in recent years towards the establishment of the CEAS, thanks to the introduction of common minimum standards.
V zadnjih letih je bil zahvaljujoč uvedbi skupnih minimalnih standardov dosežen precejšen napredek pri vzpostavitvi CEAS.
There remain great disparities between the Member States, however, in the granting of international protection and the forms that such protection takes.
Vendar med državami članicami obstajajo velike razlike pri zagotavljanju mednarodne zaščite in pri oblikah te zaščite.
In its Policy Plan on Asylum, adopted in June 2008, the Commission announced its intention to develop the CEAS by proposing a revision of the existing legal instruments in order to achieve greater harmonisation of the applicable standards and by strengthening support for practical cooperation between the Member States, in particular, by a legislative proposal to establish a European Asylum Support Office (the Support Office) in order to increase coordination of operational cooperation between Member States so that the common rules are implemented effectively.
Komisija je v načrtu politike azila, ki ga je sprejela junija 2008, napovedala, da si bo prizadevala za razvoj CEAS in v ta namen predlagala revizijo obstoječih zakonodajnih instrumentov, da se zagotovi večja usklajenost veljavnih standardov, in okrepila podporo praktičnemu sodelovanju med državami članicami, zlasti s predložitvijo zakonodajnega predloga za ustanovitev Evropskega azilnega podpornega urada (v nadaljnjem besedilu: podporni urad), da bi se okrepila koordinacija operativnega sodelovanja med državami članicami, namenjenega učinkovitemu izvajanju skupnih pravil.
In the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum, adopted in September 2008, the European Council solemnly reiterated that any persecuted foreigner is entitled to obtain aid and protection on the territory of the European Union in application of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967, and other relevant treaties.
Evropski svet je v Evropskem paktu o priseljevanju in azilu, sprejetem septembra 2008, znova slovesno poudaril, da ima vsak preganjani tujec pravico do pomoči in zaščite na ozemlju Evropske unije v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo o statusu beguncev z dne 28. julija 1951, kakor je bila spremenjena z newyorškim protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967, in drugimi ustreznimi pogodbami.
It was also expressly agreed that a European support office would be established in 2009.
Prav tako je bilo izrecno dogovorjeno, da se evropski podporni urad ustanovi leta 2009.
Practical cooperation on asylum aims to increase convergence and ensure ongoing quality of Member States’ decision-making procedures in that area, within a European legislative framework.
Namen sodelovanja v praksi na področju azila je povečati zbliževanje in zagotoviti stalno kakovost postopkov odločanja držav članic na tem področju znotraj evropskega zakonodajnega okvira.
A substantial number of practical cooperation measures have already been undertaken in recent years, notably the adoption of a common approach to information on countries of origin and the establishment of a common European asylum curriculum.
V zadnjih letih so se že začeli izvajati številni ukrepi sodelovanja v praksi, zlasti sprejetje skupnega pristopa k informacijam o državah izvora in glede vzpostavitve skupnega evropskega programa usposabljanja na področju azila.
The Support Office should be established in order to strengthen and develop those cooperation measures.
Za krepitev in razvoj teh ukrepov sodelovanja bi bilo treba ustanoviti podporni urad.
In the interests of simplifying actions to support practical cooperation on asylum matters, and in so far as the Support Office should be entrusted with some of the tasks that are currently financed under the European Refugee Fund, it is necessary to transfer responsibility for some of the Community actions provided for in Article 4 of Decision No 573/2007/EC [2] from the European Refugee Fund to the Support Office in order to ensure the best possible practical cooperation on asylum matters.
Zaradi poenostavitve ukrepov podpore sodelovanju v praksi na področju azila in ker bi moral podporni urad opravljati številne naloge, ki se zdaj financirajo iz naslova Evropskega sklada za begunce, je treba odgovornost za nekatere ukrepe Unije iz člena 4 Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES [2] iz Evropskega sklada za begunce prenesti na podporni urad, da se zagotovi čim učinkovitejše sodelovanje v praksi na področju azila.
In order to take account of the reduced scope of the Community actions, the limit for their funding laid down in Decision No 573/2007/EC should be reduced from 10 % of the Fund’s available resources to 4 % thereof.
Za zagotovitev upoštevanja zmanjšanja števila ukrepov Skupnosti bi bilo treba omejitev njihovega financiranja iz 10 % razpoložljivih sredstev Sklada, predvidenih v Odločbi št. 573/2007/ES, zmanjšati na 4 %.
The financial envelope for the implementation of Decision No 573/2007/EC should be reduced in order to free up resources for funding the Support Office.
Znesek finančnih sredstev za izvajanje Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES bi bilo treba zmanjšati, da bi se tako sprostila sredstva za financiranje podpornega urada.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the Position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the United Kingdom and Ireland have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Decision.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Velike Britanije in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, sta Velika Britanija in Irska sporočili, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi tega sklepa.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the Position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it nor subject to its application,
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja –
Decision No 573/2007/EC is hereby amended as follows:
Odločba št. 573/2007/ES se spremeni:
in paragraph 1, the figure ‘10 %’ is replaced by the figure ‘4 %’;
v odstavku 1 se odstotek „10 %“ nadomesti z odstotkom „4 %“;
in paragraph 2, points (a) and (f) are deleted;
v odstavku 2 se črtata točki (a) in (f);
Article 12(1) is replaced by the following:
člen 12(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The financial envelope for the implementation of this Decision from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2013 shall be EUR 614 million.’.
Finančna sredstva za izvajanje te odločbe od 1. januarja 2008 do 31. decembra 2013 znašajo 614 milijonov EUR.“
Done at Strasbourg, 19 May 2010.
V Strasbourgu, 19. maja 2010
Position of the European Parliament of 7 May 2009 (not yet published in the Official Journal), position of the Council at first reading of 25 February 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. maja 2009 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu), stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi z dne 25. februarja 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Position of the European Parliament of 19 May 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. maja 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
of 18 August 2010
z dne 18. avgusta 2010
authorising physical checks pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 669/2009 to be carried out at approved premises of feed and food business operators in Malta
o pooblastilu v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 669/2009 za izvajanje fizičnih pregledov v prostorih nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti na Malti
(notified under document C(2010) 5684)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 5684)
(Only the English and Maltese texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem in malteškem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 669/2009 of 24 July 2009 implementing Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the increased level of official controls on imports of certain feed and food of non-animal origin and amending Decision 2006/504/EC [1], and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 669/2009 z dne 24. julija 2009 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede poostrenega uradnega nadzora pri uvozu nekatere krme in nekaterih živil neživalskega izvora ter spremembi Odločbe 2006/504/ES [1] in zlasti člena 9(1) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 669/2009 lays down rules concerning the increased level of official controls on imports of certain feed and food of non-animal origin, including the physical checks to be carried out at designated points of entry into the European Union.
Uredba (ES) št. 669/2009 določa pravila glede poostrenega uradnega nadzora pri uvozu nekatere krme in nekaterih živil neživalskega izvora, vključno s fizičnimi pregledi, ki se izvajajo na določenih vstopnih točkah v Evropsko unijo.
Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 669/2009 provides that the Commission, upon a request by a Member State, may authorise the competent authorities of certain designated points of entry, operating under specific geographical constraints, to carry out the physical checks at the premises of a feed or a food business operator, subject to certain conditions.
Člen 9(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 669/2009 določa, da lahko Komisija na zahtevo države članice pooblasti pristojne organe nekaterih določenih vstopnih točk, ki delujejo pri posebnih geografskih ovirah, da izvajajo fizične preglede v prostorih nosilca dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti pod nekaterimi pogoji.
By letter dated 18 December 2009, Malta referred to the specific geographical situation of the designated point of entry of Floriana Port, to the relatively low throughput of imports from third countries of products of non-animal origin, as well as to the small size and the proximity of the islands constituting its territory, and requested the Commission to authorise the competent authorities of that point of entry to carry out the required physical checks at the premises of certain feed and food business operators.
Malta je v dopisu z dne 18. decembra 2009 navedla poseben geografski položaj določene vstopne točke pristanišča Floriana, relativno nizek promet uvoza proizvodov neživalskega izvora iz tretjih držav ter majhnost in bližino otokov, ki sestavljajo njeno ozemlje, ter od Komisije zahtevala pooblastilo, da lahko pristojni organi navedene vstopne točke izvajajo zahtevane fizične preglede v prostorih nekaterih nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti.
By letter dated 28 February 2010 and subsequent correspondence, Malta provided the Commission with assurances to the effect that: only the premises of feed and food business operators complying with the minimum requirements for designated points of entry laid down in Regulation (EC) No 669/2009 would be approved for the performance of the physical checks; the level of resources allocated to the competent authorities of Floriana Port would be such that the control activities carried out at that designated point of entry would not be disrupted or adversely affected by the possibility that physical checks would be carried out away from its premises; and consignments selected for physical checks at the premises of a feed or a food business operator would remain under continuous control of the competent authorities of Floriana Port from the moment of their arrival at this point of entry and in such a way that they cannot be tampered with in any manner throughout all checks.
Malta je v dopisu z dne 28. februarja 2010 in v poznejših dopisih Komisiji zagotovila, da bodo za izvajanje fizičnih pregledov pooblaščeni le prostori nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti, ki izpolnjujejo minimalne zahteve za določene vstopne točke iz Uredbe (ES) št. 669/2009; da bodo pristojnim organom v pristanišču Floriana dodeljena ustrezna sredstva, da nadzor na navedeni določeni vstopni točki ne bo oviran oz. da nanj ne bo negativno vplivalo morebitno izvajanje fizičnih pregledov zunaj njihovih prostorov; in da bodo pošiljke, izbrane za fizične preglede v prostorih nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti, pod stalnim nadzorom pristojnih organov pristanišča Floriana od njihovega prihoda na to vstopno točko, tako da ne bodo mogle biti na noben način spremenjene med vsemi pregledi.
Therefore, taking into account the specific geographical constraints of the designated point of entry of Floriana Port and the confirmation from Malta of the fulfilment of the conditions laid down in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 669/2009, it is appropriate to authorise that physical checks may be carried out at the premises of certain feed and food business operators approved by Malta for such checks.
Zato je ob upoštevanju posebnih geografskih ovir določene vstopne točke v pristanišču Floriana in potrditve Malte o izpolnjevanju pogojev iz člena 9(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 669/2009 primerno izdati pooblastilo, da se lahko fizični pregledi izvajajo v prostorih nekaterih nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti, ki jih je Malta odobrila za takšne preglede.
In order to ensure adequate publicity to the authorisation provided for in this Decision, it is appropriate that a list of the premises of feed and food business operators, approved for physical checks pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 669/2009, is made publicly available on the Internet through the national link provided for in Article 5 of that Regulation,
Za zagotovitev ustrezne obveščenosti javnosti o pooblastilu iz tega sklepa je primerno, da se na spletu prek nacionalne povezave iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 669/2009 objavi seznam prostorov nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti, odobrenih za fizične preglede v skladu z navedeno uredbo –
The competent authorities of the designated point of entry of Floriana Port in Malta are hereby authorised, in accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 669/2009, to carry out the physical checks provided for in Article 8(1)(b) of that Regulation on imports of feed and food of non-animal origin listed in Annex I thereto, at the premises of a feed or food business operator approved by Malta for such checks, provided that the conditions set out in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 9(1) of that Regulation are met.
Pristojni organi določene vstopne točke v pristanišču Floriana na Malti se v skladu s členom 9(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 669/2009 pooblastijo za izvajanje fizičnih pregledov iz člena 8(1)(b) navedene uredbe uvoženih pošiljk krme in živil neživalskega izvora iz Priloge I k navedeni uredbi v prostorih nosilca dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti, ki jih je Malta odobrila za takšne preglede, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 9(1)(a), (b) in (c) navedene uredbe.
The list of feed and food business operators whose premises are approved by Malta, as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, shall be made publicly available on the Internet through the national link provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 669/2009.
Seznam nosilcev dejavnosti proizvodnje krme in živilske dejavnosti iz odstavka 1 tega člena, katerih prostore je odobrila Malta, se objavi na spletu prek nacionalne povezave iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 669/2009.
Done at Brussels, 18 August 2010.
V Bruslju, 18. avgusta 2010
on State aid measures C 38/A/04 (ex NN 58/04) and C 36/B/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy for Alcoa Trasformazioni
o državni pomoči C 38/A/04 (ex NN 58/04) in C 36/B/06 (ex NN 38/06) Italije za Alcoa Trasformazioni
(notified under document C(2009) 8112)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2009) 8112)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
Case C 38/A/04
Zadeva C 38/A/04
By letter dated 4 December 2003, a series of articles published in the Italian press on the Italian government’s intention to introduce preferential electricity tariffs for selected undertakings in Sardinia was brought to the Commission’s attention.
Z dopisom z dne 4. decembra 2003 je bila Komisija obveščena, da je bilo v italijanskih medijih objavljenih več člankov, v katerih je bilo navedeno, da namerava italijanska vlada uvesti ugodnejše cene električne energije za izbrana podjetja na Sardiniji.
By letters dated 22 January 2004 and 19 March 2004, the Commission requested further information on these measures.
Z dopisoma z dne 22. januarja 2004 in 19 marca 2004 je Komisija pozvala Italijo, naj predloži dodatne informacije o zadevnih ukrepih.
By letter dated 16 November 2004, the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate proceedings under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid measure.
Z dopisom z dne 16. novembra 2004 je Komisija sporočila Italiji, da bo sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES glede ukrepa pomoči.
The Commission’s decision to initiate the proceedings was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi z ukrepi.
Italy submitted observations by letters dated 4 February 2005 and 11 February 2005.
Italija je predložila svoje pripombe z dopisoma z dne 4. februarja 2005 in 11. februarja 2005.
Italy’s comments were received by letter dated 20 September 2005.
Pripombe Italije je prejela z dopisom z dne 20. septembra 2005.
On 29 October 2008, the case was split into part A, which covers the measure with regard to Alcoa, and part B, which deals with Portovesme, ILA and Euroallumina.
Zadeva se je 29. oktobra 2008 razdelila na del A, ki zajema ukrep v zvezi z družbo Alcoa, ter del B, v katerem so obravnavane družbe Portovesme, ILA in Euroallumina.
The present Decision concerns Alcoa alone (part A).
Ta sklep zadeva le družbo Alcoa (del A).
Case C 36/B/06
Zadeva C 36/B/06
In the course of a related State aid case [6], the Commission became aware of a second extension of the preferential electricity tariff scheme applying to Alcoa.
Komisija je bila med obravnavo podobne zadeve v zvezi z državno pomočjo [6] seznanjena z drugim podaljšanjem veljavnosti sheme ugodnejše cene električne energije za družbo Alcoa.
The extension was granted by virtue of Article 11(11) of Decree-Law No 35 of 14 March 2005, converted into Law No 80/2005 of 14 May 2005‘Urgent Provisions under the Action Plan for Economic, Social and Territorial Development’.
Podaljšanje veljavnosti je bilo odobreno na podlagi člena 11(11) zakonskega odloka št. 35 z dne 14. marca 2005, spremenjenega v zakon št. 80/2005 z dne 14. maja 2005 z naslovom „Nujne določbe v skladu z akcijskim načrtom za gospodarski, socialni in ozemeljski razvoj“.
The beneficiaries were Alcoa and the three successor companies to Terni [7].
Upravičenci so bili družba Alcoa in tri družbe naslednice družbe Terni [7].
By letter dated 19 July 2006, the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate proceedings under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty with regard to both schemes (C 36/06).
Z dopisom z dne 19. julija 2006 je Komisija sporočila Italiji, da bo sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES (C 36/06) glede obeh shem.
The Commission’s decision to initiate proceedings was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [8].
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [8].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures concerned.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o zadevnih ukrepih.
The Commission also received comments from other interested parties, which were forwarded to Italy, thus giving it the opportunity to respond to them.
Komisija je prav tako prejela pripombe od drugih zainteresiranih strani in jih predložila Italiji ter ji dala možnost odgovora.