natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 of 12 July 2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes [3], established a Community agency, called the European GNSS Supervisory Authority (hereinafter the ‘Authority’).
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1321/2004 z dne 12. julija 2004 o vzpostavitvi upravljavskih struktur Evropskega satelitskega radio-navigacijskega sistema [3] je bila ustanovljena agencija Skupnosti, imenovana Nadzorni organ za evropski GNSS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Organ).
Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo) [4] defines the new framework for the public governance and financing of the programmes.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 683/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o nadaljevanju izvajanja evropskih satelitskih navigacijskih programov (EGNOS in Galileo) [4] je določen nov okvir za javno upravljanje in financiranje programov.
It sets out the principle of the strict division of responsibilities between the European Union, represented by the Commission, the Authority and the European Space Agency (hereinafter the ‘ESA’), granting the Commission responsibility for the management of the programmes and attributing to it the tasks originally assigned to the Authority.
V uredbi je predvideno načelo stroge razdelitve pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo, ki jo zastopa Komisija, Organom in Evropsko vesoljsko agencijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESA), v njej se na Komisijo prenaša odgovornost za upravljanje programov in dodelijo naloge, ki so bile na začetku zaupane Organu.
It also provides that the Authority, when accomplishing the tasks entrusted to it, will ensure that the role of the Commission as manager of the programmes is respected and that the Authority acts in accordance with guidelines issued by the Commission.
Uredba tudi določa, da Organ, kadar izpolnjuje dodeljene naloge, zagotavlja, da je vloga Komisije kot upravnika programov spoštovana in da Organ deluje v skladu s smernicami, ki jih izda Komisija.
In Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council invited the Commission to put forward a proposal to align formally the management structures of the programmes as set out in Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 with the new roles of the Commission and the Authority as set out in Regulation (EC) No 683/2008.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 683/2008 sta Evropski parlament in Svet povabila Komisijo, naj izdela predlog za formalno uskladitev upravljavskih struktur programov, določenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1321/2004, z novo vlogo Komisije in nadzornega organa, določeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 683/2008.
In view of its reduced sphere of activity, the Authority should no longer be called the ‘European GNSS Supervisory Authority’, but rather the ‘European GNSS Agency’ (hereinafter the ‘Agency’).
Glede na zmanjšano področje delovanja se Organ ne bi smel več imenovati „ Nadzorni organ za evropski GNSS“, ampak „Agencija za evropski GNSS“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija).
However, the continuity of the activities of the Authority, including continuity as regards rights and obligations, staff and the validity of any decisions taken, should be ensured under the Agency.
Vendar pa bi moralo biti v okviru Agencije zagotovljeno nadaljevanje dejavnosti Organa, vključno glede pravic in obveznosti, osebja in veljavnosti vseh sprejetih odločitev.
The aims and objectives of Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 should also be adjusted in order to reflect the fact that the Agency is no longer responsible for the management of public interests relating to the European Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) programmes and for regulating such programmes.
Treba bi bilo prilagoditi tudi cilje Uredbe (ES) št. 1321/2004, da bo odraženo dejstvo, da Agencija ni več odgovorna za upravljanje javnih interesov glede programov globalnega evropskega navigacijskega satelitskega sistema (GNSS) in da ni več regulativni organ za te programe.
The legal status of the Agency should be such as to enable it to act as a legal person in the discharge of its tasks.
Pravni status Agencije bi moral biti tak, da ji omogoča, da pri izvajanju svojih nalog deluje kot pravna oseba.
It is also important to modify the tasks of the Agency, and, in this regard, to ensure that its tasks are defined in accordance with those set out in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, including the possibility for the Agency to accomplish other activities that may be entrusted to it by the Commission, in order to support the Commission in the implementation of the programmes.
Pomembno je prilagoditi tudi naloge Agencije in v zvezi s tem zagotoviti, da so njene naloge opredeljene v skladu s tistimi, določenimi v členu 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008, vključno z možnostjo Agencije, da izpolnjuje druge naloge, ki ji jih lahko poveri Komisija, v podporo Komisiji pri izvajanju programov.
In accordance with Article 54(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], such activities could for example include following the development of coordination and consultation procedures on security-related matters, carrying out research of benefit to the development and promotion of the programmes and providing support in the development and implementation of the Public Regulated Service (PRS) pilot project.
V skladu s členom 54(2)(b) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5], bi takšne dejavnosti lahko vključevale na primer spremljanje razvoja usklajevalnih in posvetovalnih postopkov na področju varnosti, izvajanje vseh raziskovalnih dejavnosti, ki so koristne za razvoj in promocijo programov ter zagotavljanje podpore pri razvoju in izvajanju pilotnega projekta za javne regulirane storitve (projekt PRS).
Within its scope, its objectives and in the performance of its tasks, the Agency should comply in particular with the provisions applicable to Union institutions.
Na svojem področju, v okviru ciljev in pri opravljanju nalog, bi morala Agencija upoštevati zlasti določbe, ki se uporabljajo za institucije Unije.
The Commission should, in the context of its mid-term review of the Galileo programme planned for 2010 as referred to in Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, also address the issue of the governance of the programmes in the operating and exploitation phase and the role of the Agency in this context.
Komisija bi morala v okviru vmesnega pregleda programa Galileo, načrtovanega za leto 2010, kakor določa člen 22 Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008, obravnavati vprašanje upravljanja programov v fazi delovanja in uporabe ter vprašanje, kakšno vlogo bo v tej zvezi imela Agencija.
In order to ensure effectively the accomplishment of the tasks of the Agency, the Member States and the Commission should be represented on an Administrative Board entrusted with the necessary powers to establish the budget, verify its execution, adopt the appropriate financial rules, establish transparent working procedures for decision making by the Agency, approve its work programme and appoint the Executive Director.
Da bi bilo zagotavljanje izpolnjevanja nalog Agencije učinkovito, bi morale biti države članice in Komisija zastopane v upravnem svetu, ki so mu poverjene pristojnosti, potrebne za določanje proračuna, preverjanje njegovega izvrševanja, sprejemanje finančnih pravil, določanje preglednih delovnih postopkov pri odločanju Agencije, odobritev njegovega programa dela ter imenovanje izvršilnega direktorja.
It is also appropriate to include a representative of the European Parliament in the Administrative Board as a non-voting member, in view of the fact that Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 highlighted the usefulness of close cooperation between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Prav tako je primerno vključiti predstavnika Evropskega parlamenta v upravni svet kot člana brez glasovalne pravice, saj je bila v Uredbi (ES) št. 683/2008 poudarjena koristnost tesnega sodelovanja med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo.
In order to ensure that the Agency accomplishes its tasks whilst respecting the role of the Commission as manager of the programmes and in accordance with guidelines issued by the Commission, it is also important to state explicitly that the Agency should be managed by an Executive Director under the supervision of the Administrative Board, in accordance with the guidelines issued to the Agency by the Commission.
Da bi se zagotovilo, da bi Agencija izpolnjevala svoje naloge ob priznavanju Komisije v vlogi upravnika programov in v skladu s smernicami, ki jih izda Komisija, je pomembno izrecno določiti, da bi moral Agencijo upravljati njen izvršilni direktor pod nadzorom upravnega sveta in v skladu s smernicami, ki jih za Agencijo izda Komisija.
It is equally important to specify that the Commission should have five representatives on the Administrative Board and that decisions regarding a limited number of tasks of the Administrative Board should not be adopted without the favourable vote of the representatives of the Commission.
Enako pomembno je določiti, da bi morala imeti Komisija v upravnem svetu pet predstavnikov, in da odločitve v zvezi z omejenim številom nalog upravnega sveta ne bi smele biti sprejete brez pozitivnih glasov predstavnikov Komisije.
The smooth functioning of the Agency requires that its Executive Director be appointed on the grounds of merit and documented administrative and managerial skills, as well as relevant competence and experience, and that he performs his duties with complete independence and flexibility in relation to the organisation of the internal functioning of the Agency.
Da bi Agencija delovala nemoteno, je treba njenega izvršilnega direktorja imenovati na podlagi zaslug in dokazanih upravnih in vodstvenih sposobnosti ter ustrezne usposobljenosti in izkušenj, kakor tudi, da svoje naloge glede organizacije notranjega delovanja Agencije opravlja popolnoma neodvisno ter prožno.
Except as regards certain activities and measures relating to security accreditation, the Executive Director should prepare and take all necessary measures to ensure the proper accomplishment of the work programme of the Agency, should prepare each year a draft general report to be submitted to the Administrative Board, should draw up a draft statement of estimates of revenues and expenditure of the Agency and implement the budget.
Razen nekaterih dejavnosti in ukrepov v zvezi z varnostno akreditacijo bi moral izvršilni direktor pripraviti in sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi bil delovni progam Agencije zagotovo izpeljan ustrezno, vsako leto bi moral pripraviti osnutek splošnega poročila, ki se predloži upravnemu svetu, sestaviti predlog načrta prihodkov in odhodkov Agencije ter izvrševati proračun.
The Administrative Board should be empowered to take any decision which may ensure that the Agency is able to accomplish its tasks with the exception of the security accreditation tasks, which should be entrusted to a Security Accreditation Board for European GNSS systems (hereinafter the ‘Security Accreditation Board’).
Upravni svet bi moral biti pooblaščen za sprejetje odločitev, s katerimi se zagotavlja, da Agencija lahko izpolnjuje svoje naloge, razen nalog v zvezi z varnostno akreditacijo, ki jih je treba zaupati svetu za varnostno akreditacijo sistemov evropskega GNSS (v nadaljevanju: svet za varnostno akreditacijo).
In respect of such accreditation tasks the Administrative Board should be responsible only for resource and budget matters.
Glede teh nalog v zvezi z akreditacijo bi moral upravni svet opravljati le naloge, povezane z viri in proračunom.
Sound governance of the programmes also requires that the tasks of the Administrative Board be compliant with the new missions assigned to the Agency under Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, notably regarding the operation of the Galileo security centre and the instructions given pursuant to Council Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP of 12 July 2004 on aspects of the operation of the European satellite radio-navigation system affecting the security of the European Union [6].
Dobro upravljanje programov zahteva tudi skladnost nalog upravnega sveta z novimi cilji, naloženimi Agenciji na podlagi člena 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008, zlasti kar zadeva obratovanje centra za varnost Galileo in navodila, izdana na podlagi Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2004/552/SZVP z dne 12. julija 2004 o vidikih delovanja Evropskega satelitskega radio-navigacijskega sistema, ki vplivajo na varnost Evropske unije [6].
Procedures for the appointment of office-holders should be transparent.
Postopki za imenovanje zaposlenih bi morali biti pregledni.
In view of the scope of the tasks entrusted to the Agency, which include security accreditation, the Scientific and Technical Committee set up in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 should be disbanded and the System Security and Safety Committee established in accordance with Article 10 of that Regulation should be replaced by the Security Accreditation Board, which will be responsible for security accreditation, and composed of representatives from the Member States and the Commission.
Ob upoštevanju obsega nalog, zaupanih Agenciji, med katerimi je tudi varnostna akreditacija, bi bilo treba razpustiti znanstveno-tehnični odbor, ustanovljen v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1321/2004, ter zamenjati odbor za varnost in varovanje sistema, ustanovljen v skladu s členom 10 navedene uredbe, s svetom za varnostno akreditacijo, ki bo odgovoren za varnostno akreditiranje ter sestavljen iz predstavnikov držav članic in Komisije.
The High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (hereinafter the ‘HR’) and the ESA should have an observer role in the Security Accreditation Board.
Visoki predstavnik za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko (v nadaljevanju: VP) in ESA bi morala imeti vlogo opazovalcev v svetu za varnostno akreditacijo.
Security accreditation activities should be carried out independently of the authorities responsible for managing the programmes, notably the Commission, the other bodies of the Agency, the ESA, and other entities responsible for implementing provisions with regard to security.
Dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije bi bilo treba izvajati neodvisno od organov, ki upravljajo programe, zlasti Komisije, drugih organov Agencije, ESA in drugih subjektov, odgovornih za izvajanje varnostnih določb.
In order to ensure such independence, the Security Accreditation Board should be established as the security accreditation authority for the European GNSS systems (hereinafter the ‘systems’) and for receivers containing PRS technology.
Da bi zagotovili takšno neodvisnost, bi moral biti svet za varnostno akreditacijo ustanovljen kot organ za varnostno akreditacijo sistemov evropskega GNSS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistemi) in sprejemnikov s tehnologijo PRS.
It should be an autonomous body which, within the Agency, takes its decisions independently and objectively, in the interest of the citizens.
To bi moral biti samostojen organ znotraj Agencije, ki svoje odločitve sprejema neodvisno in nepristransko v interesu državljanov.
Given that the Commission, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, manages all aspects relating to system security, and in order to ensure efficient governance of security issues and compliance with the principle of strict division of responsibilities provided for under that Regulation, it is essential that the activities of the Security Accreditation Board be strictly limited to the security accreditation activities of systems and that they do not under any circumstances encroach on the tasks entrusted to the Commission under Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008.
Ker Komisija v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 683/2008 upravlja vse vidike, povezane z varnostjo sistema, in za zagotovitev učinkovitega upravljanja varnostnih vidikov in upoštevanje načela stroge razdelitve pristojnosti, ki je predvideno v navedeni uredbi, je bistveno, da so dejavnosti sveta za varnostno akreditacijo strogo omejene na dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije sistemov in da nikakor ne morejo posegati v dejavnosti, zaupane Komisiji na podlagi člena 13 Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008.
The decisions taken by the Commission in accordance with procedures involving the European GNSS Programmes Committee will in no way affect the existing rules on budgetary matters or the specific competence of Member States on security matters.
Odločitve Komisije, sprejete v skladu s postopki, ki vključujejo Odbor za programe evropskega GNSS, na noben način ne vplivajo na sedanja pravila o proračunskih zadevah ali specifične pristojnosti držav članic glede varnostnih zadev.
In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008, in cases where the security of the Union or of the Member States may be affected by the operation of the systems, the procedures set out in Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP apply.
V skladu s členom 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008 se, kadar bi obratovanje sistemov vplivalo na varnost Unije ali držav članic, uporabijo postopki iz Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2004/552/SZVP.
In particular, in the event of a threat to the security of the Union or of a Member State arising from the operation or use of the systems, or in the event of a threat to the operation of the systems, in particular as a result of an international crisis, the Council, acting unanimously, is able to decide on the necessary instructions to give to the Agency and to the Commission.
Svet lahko zlasti v primeru, da bi v povezavi z obratovanjem ali uporabo sistemov bila ogrožena varnost Unije ali katere od držav članic ali da bi bilo ogroženo obratovanje sistemov, zlasti zaradi mednarodne krize, soglasno odloči o potrebnih navodilih za Agencijo in za Komisijo.
Any member of the Council, the HR or the Commission is able to request a Council discussion to agree on such instructions.
Razpravo v Svetu, da bi se dogovorili o takšnih navodilih, lahko zahteva vsak član Sveta, VP ali Komisija.
In application of the principle of subsidiarity, security accreditation decisions should, following the process defined in the security accreditation strategy, be based on local security accreditation decisions taken by the respective national security accreditation authorities of the Member States.
Po načelu subsidiarnosti bi morale odločitve o varnostni akreditaciji, v skladu s postopkom, opredeljenim v strategiji za varnostno akreditiranje, temeljiti na odločitvah o lokalni varnostni akreditaciji, ki so jih sprejeli posamezni nacionalni organi za varnostno akreditacijo držav članic.
In order for it to carry out all of its activities quickly and effectively, the Security Accreditation Board should be able to set up appropriate subordinate bodies acting on its instructions.
Da bi lahko svet za varnostno akreditacijo vse svoje dejavnosti izvajal hitro in učinkovito, bi moral imeti možnost ustanovitve primernih podrejenih organov, ki delujejo po njegovih navodilih.
It should accordingly set up a panel to assist it in preparing its decisions and a Crypto Distribution Authority, managing and preparing crypto material issues, including a Flight Key Cell dedicated to operational flight keys for launches, as well as other bodies, if necessary, to deal with specific issues.
Tako bi moral ustanoviti „komisijo“, ki bi mu pomagala pri pripravi njegovih odločitev, ter „organ za razpošiljanje kriptografskega materiala“, ki bi upravljal in pripravljal zadeve v zvezi s kriptografskim materialom, vključno s „ključno celico za polete“, ki bi se osredotočala na operativne ključe za polete in izstrelitve, ter po potrebi druga telesa za obravnavanje specifičnih vprašanj.
In doing so, special consideration should be given to the necessary continuity of the work in those bodies.
Pri tem bi bilo treba posebej obravnavati potrebno nadaljevanje dela v teh organih.
It is also important for security accreditation activities to be coordinated with the work of the authorities responsible for managing the programmes and other entities responsible for implementing security provisions.
Pomembno je tudi, da so dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije usklajene z delom organov, ki upravljajo programe, in drugih subjektov, odgovornih za izvajanje varnostnih določb.
Given the specific nature and complexity of the systems, it is essential for the security accreditation activities to be carried out in a context of collective responsibility for the security of the Union and of the Member States, by making efforts to reach a consensus and by involving all parties with an interest in security, and for permanent risk monitoring.
Glede na specifičnost in zapletenost sistemov je nujno, da dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije potekajo v okviru kolektivne odgovornosti za varnost Unije in držav članic, s prizadevanjem za doseganje soglasja in vključevanjem vseh akterjev, ki jih zadeva varnost, ter za stalno spremljanje tveganja.
It is also imperative that technical security accreditation activities be entrusted to professionals who are duly qualified in the field of accrediting complex systems and who have an adequate level of security clearance.
Nujno je tudi, da se tehnične dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije zaupajo uglednim strokovnjakom, ki so primerno usposobljeni za akreditiranje zapletenih sistemov in imajo varnostno dovoljenje ustrezne stopnje.
In order to ensure that the Security Accreditation Board is able to accomplish its tasks, it should also be provided that Member States supply that Board with any necessary documentation, grant access to classified information and to any areas falling within their jurisdiction to duly authorised persons, and that they should be responsible at local level for the accreditation of the security of areas that are located within their territory.
Da bi svet za varnostno akreditacijo lahko izpolnjeval svoje naloge, bi bilo treba določiti tudi, da mu države članice pošljejo vse potrebne dokumente, ustrezno pooblaščenim osebam odobrijo dostop do tajnih podatkov in do vseh območij v njihovi pristojnosti in da so na lokalni ravni odgovorne za varnostno akreditacijo območij na svojem ozemlju.
The systems established within the framework of the programmes are infrastructures the use of which extends well beyond the national boundaries of the Member States, and which are set up as trans-European networks in accordance with the provisions of Article 172 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sistemi, vzpostavljeni v okviru programov, katerih uporaba sega prek nacionalnih meja držav članic, so infrastrukture, zasnovane kot vseevropska omrežja v smislu določb člena 172 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Furthermore, the services provided via such systems contribute to the development of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructures.
Poleg tega storitve, ki se ponujajo prek teh sistemov, prispevajo k razvoju vseevropskih omrežij na področju prometne, telekomunikacijske in energetske infrastrukture.
The Commission is to assess the budgetary implications of the financing of the Agency for the expenditure heading concerned.
Komisija oceni proračunske posledice financiranja Agencije za zadevno odhodkovno postavko.
On the basis of the information and without prejudice to the relevant legislative procedure, the two arms of the budgetary authority need to achieve, in the framework of budgetary cooperation, a timely agreement on the financing of the Agency.
Na podlagi podatkov in brez poseganja v ustrezne zakonodajne postopke morata obe veji proračunskega organa v okviru proračunskega sodelovanja pravočasno doseči sporazum o financiranju Agencije.
The Union budgetary procedure is applicable to the Union contribution charged to the general budget of the European Union.
Za prispevek Unije v breme splošnega proračuna Evropske unije se uporablja proračunski postopek Unije.