natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The share of steel wheels in the production of new cars in the EU increased by 1 percentage points over the same period.
Delež jeklenih koles v proizvodnji novih avtomobilov v EU se je v enakem obdobju povečal za 1 odstotno točko.
It can be concluded that the share of aluminium and steel wheels in the production of new cars remained stable.
Lahko se sklene, da sta deleža aluminijastih in jeklenih koles v proizvodnji novih avtomobilov ostala stabilna.
Besides, trends of consumption and production of aluminium wheels also do not support the above argument.
Poleg tega tudi trendi porabe in proizvodnje aluminijastih koles ne podpirajo zgornjega argumenta.
Therefore, it had to be rejected.
Zato ga je bilo treba zavrniti.
None of the arguments submitted by the interested parties demonstrates that the impact of factors other than dumped imports from the PRC is such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury found.
Nobeden od argumentov, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, ni pokazal, da bi bil vpliv drugih dejavnikov razen dampinškega uvoza iz LRK tolikšen, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in ugotovljeno škodo.
The conclusions on causation in the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve o vzročni zvezi iz začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
In view of parties’ comments the Commission conducted further analysis of all arguments pertaining to the Union interest.
Glede na pripombe strani je Komisija izvedla nadaljnjo analizo vseh argumentov, ki se nanašajo na interes Unije.
All issues have been examined and the conclusions of the provisional Regulation confirmed.
Vsa vprašanja so se preučila in sklepne ugotovitve začasne uredbe so se potrdile.
As announced in recital (160) of the provisional Regulation the Commission further investigated the impact of duties on companies that import and resell their own branded ARWs, the production of which they have outsourced to the PRC.
Kot je bilo napovedano v uvodni izjavi (160) začasne uredbe, je Komisija dodatno preiskala vpliv dajatev na družbe, ki uvažajo in naprej prodajajo svojo lastno blagovno znamko aluminijastih koles, ki jih proizvedejo zunanji izvajalci v LRK.
It has been established that although the impact of duties on such a company would most probably be more than impact on other types of importers as defined in recitals (159) – (160) of the provisional Regulation, it would still not be disproportionate in view of global effects on the whole Union industry.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da kljub temu, da bi bil vpliv dajatev na tako družbo po vsej verjetnosti večji kot vpliv na druge vrste uvoznikov, ki so opredeljeni v uvodnih izjavah (159) in (160) začasne uredbe, še vedno ne bi bil nesorazmeren glede na svetovne učinke na celotno industrijo Unije.
Based on price data provided for the IP by one cooperating importer (outsourcer) it was established that the profit margins achieved by such company would be sufficient to shoulder the effects of the duties.
Na podlagi podatkov o cenah za OP, ki jih je zagotovil en sodelujoči uvoznik (zunanji izvajalec), je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi stopnje dobička, ki jih doseže taka družba, zadostovale za prevzem učinkov dajatev.
The margins achieved by that company were higher than the proposed duties.
Stopnje, ki jih je dosegla navedena družba, so bile višje od predlaganih dajatev.
After imposition of provisional measures parties reiterated general comments on high cost impact of measures without providing evidence substantiating such claims.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so strani ponovile splošne pripombe o vplivu ukrepov na visoke stroške, ne da bi zagotovile dokaze, ki bi podprli te trditve.
It is recalled that the cost impact analysis was based on data provided by the cooperating car manufacturers.
Treba je opozoriti, da je analiza vpliva na stroške temeljila na podatkih, ki so jih zagotovili sodelujoči proizvajalci avtomobilov.
Only three companies provided such data before imposition of provisional measures and only this data could form the basis of the Commission’s conclusions.
Samo tri družbe so zagotovile take podatke pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov in samo ti podatki so bili lahko podlaga za sklepne ugotovitve Komisije.
As stated in recital (165) of the provisional Regulation, the cost impact of measures is limited,with a maximum cost impact of 0,223 % (if accepting that all price levels would go up by 22,3 %).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (165) začasne uredbe, je vpliv ukrepov na stroške omejen (z največjim vplivom na stroške v višini 0,223 % ob predpostavki, da se bodo vse ravni cen povečale za 22,3 %).
However even this maximum cost impact appears limited in view of the turnover achieved by car makers.
Vendar se celo ta največji vpliv na stroške zdi omejen glede na promet, ki ga dosegajo izdelovalci avtomobilov.
Some parties claimed that the cost increase due to measures would force them to delocalize their production.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da bi jih povečanje stroškov zaradi ukrepov prisililo, da spremenijo lokacijo svoje proizvodnje.
However, in view of the limited cost impact a decision to delocalize car production mentioned by some car makers would seem disproportionate to the cost impact established.
A glede na omejen vpliv na stroške se zdi, da bi bila odločitev, da se spremeni lokacija, ki so jo omenjali nekateri izdelovalci, nesorazmerna z ugotovljenim vplivom na stroške.
The claims had to be therefore rejected.
Zato je bilo trditve treba zavrniti.
It has to be also noted that the arguments on high cost impact contradict with comments of some car manufacturers that they rely on Chinese supplies to a very limited extent.
Treba je opozoriti, da so argumenti o vplivu na visoke stroške v nasprotju s pripombami nekaterih proizvajalcev avtomobilov, da se zanašajo na kitajske dobavitelje v zelo omejenem obsegu.
The conclusions on cost impact of measures in the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve iz začasne uredbe o vplivu ukrepov na stroške se potrdijo.
Variety of sources of supply
Raznovrstnost virov dobave
The complainant submitted that imposition of measures would be in the interest of car industry.
Pritožnik je trdil, da bi bila uvedba ukrepov v interesu avtomobilske industrije.
By ensuring that the Union industry would remain operational it would ensure a variety of sources of supply.
Z zagotovitvijo, da bi ostala industrija Unije operativna, bi zagotovili raznovrstnost virov dobave.
Other parties, most notably users, reiterated their arguments with regard to the competition on the EU market.
Druge strani, predvsem uporabniki, so ponovile argumente glede konkurence na trgu EU.
They also claimed that imports from the PRC were essential to cover the demand on the EU market with EU producers being unable to provide sufficient capacities.
Trdile so tudi, da je bil uvoz iz LRK bistven za pokritje povpraševanja na trgu EU, ker proizvajalci EU niso bili sposobni zagotoviti zadostnih zmogljivosti.
Whereas the capacity utilisation rate remained at the level of 92 % in the years 2006 and 2007, there has been a dramatic drop to 84 % in 2008 and 73 % in the IP.
Medtem ko je ostala v letih 2006 in 2007 stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti na ravni 92 %, je v letu 2008 prišlo do dramatičnega padca na 84 % in v OP na 73 %.
These data clearly demonstrates that there are, especially currently, sufficient free capacities which could be used for increased production.
Ti podatki jasno kažejo, da je zlasti zdaj dovolj prostih zmogljivosti, ki bi se lahko uporabile za povečanje proizvodnje.
Further, the argument of insufficient capacities on the part of the Union industry contradicts with other claims by the car industry namely those of substantially reduced demand for OEM wheels.
Nadalje je argument o nezadostnih zmogljivostih na strani industrije Unije v nasprotju z drugimi trditvami avtomobilske industrije, namreč s tistimi o znatnem zmanjšanju povpraševanja po kolesih OEM.
The claims therefore had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba trditve zavrniti.
One party also claimed that the Chinese producers were not producing the same product types as the European ARW manufacturers.
Ena stran je tudi trdila, da kitajski proizvajalci ne proizvajajo enake vrste izdelkov kot evropski proizvajalci aluminijastih koles.
These claims had to be rejected in view of the level of PCN matching found in this case (depending on the calculation performed, as explained in recital (93), the matching ratio would be 92 % for the undercutting calculation for the product concerned considered as a whole and 77 % for OEM and AM segments considered separately).
Te trditve je bilo treba zavrniti glede na raven ujemanja kontrolne številke izdelka (PCN), ki je bila ugotovljena v tem primeru (odvisno od opravljenega izračuna, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (93), bi bil količnik ujemanja 92 % za izračun nelojalnega nižanja za zadevni izdelek, obravnavan v celoti, in 77 % za področji OEM in AM, obravnavani ločeno).
The conclusions in recital (166) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve v uvodni izjavi (166) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
Parties reiterated their comments with regard to the negative impact of the duties in the present case when combined with other factors, like the competitive advantage given to South Korean car manufacturers on the basis of the Free Trade Agreement.
Strani so ponovile pripombe glede negativnega vpliva dajatev v tem primeru v kombinaciji z drugimi dejavniki, kot je konkurenčna prednost, dana južnokorejskim proizvajalcem avtomobilov s sporazumom o prosti trgovini.
These comments have not been substantiated by any new evidence.
Te pripombe niso bile utemeljene z nobenim novim dokazom.
It should be noted that there is no evidence that FTA would result in injury to the car industry and that in any event a safeguard instruments is available under the FTA in question as a remedy.
Treba pa je omeniti, da ni nobenega dokaza, da bi sporazum o prosti trgovini povzročil škodo za avtomobilsko industrijo in da so kot rešitev vsekakor na voljo varnostni instrumenti v okviru zadevnega sporazuma o prosti trgovini.
The conclusions in recitals (167) and (168) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve v uvodnih izjavah (167) in (168) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
The conclusions in recitals (153) – (171) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Sklepne ugotovitve v uvodnih izjavah od (153) do (171) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
Most of the comments received concerned the calculation of the injury elimination level.
Večina prejetih pripomb se je nanašala na izračun stopnje odprave škode.
Parties questioned the methodology of this calculation as such and complained about insufficient disclosure.
Strani so dvomile v samo metodologijo tega izračuna in se pritoževale nad pomanjkljivim razkritjem.
It is recalled that the methodology for calculation of the injury elimination level has been explained in detail in the note included in the file open for consultation by interested parties on the date of publication of provisional measures.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila metodologija za izračun stopnje odprave škode podrobno razložena v obvestilu, ki je bilo vključeno v dokumentacijo, odprto za posvetovanje zainteresiranih strani, na datum objave začasnih ukrepov.
All interested parties also received this note together with the disclosure letter sent on the same day.
Vse zainteresirane strani so obvestilo prejele skupaj s pismom o razkritju, ki je bilo poslano isti dan.
A second note has been included in the file open for consultation by interested parties in reply to comments submitted after the imposition of provisional measures.
Drugo obvestilo je bilo vključeno v dokumentacijo, odprto za posvetovanje zainteresiranih strani, v odgovor na pripombe, ki so bile predložene po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov.
It is recalled that PCNs used for the calculation per car maker were clearly identified in the above mentioned note.
Treba je opozoriti, da so bile kontrolne številke izdelkov (PCN), ki so bile uporabljene za izračun po izdelovalcih avtomobilov, v zgoraj omenjenem obvestilu jasno ugotovljene.
However, precise data on price and volume items could not be disclosed due to confidentiality reasons.
Vendar se natančni podatki o ceni in obsegu izdelkov ne morejo razkriti zaradi zaupnih razlogov.
As regards imports from China, data on quantities exported, on CIF Union border value and weighted average unit sales prices could not be disclosed as they were based on transactions made by two exporters.
Glede uvoza iz Kitajske se podatki o izvoženih količinah, o vrednosti CIF meja Unije in tehtanih povprečnih prodajnih cenah na enoto niso mogli razkriti, ker so temeljili na transakcijah, ki sta jih opravila dva izvoznika.
The disclosure hence would breach the confidentiality requirements as contained in the basic Regulation.
Z razkritjem bi prekršili zahteve glede zaupnosti, ki jih vsebuje osnovna uredba.
As regards transactions made by the Union producers on the EU market, providing more detailed information would only be meaningful if given individually for each of the producers.
Glede transakcij, ki so jih opravili proizvajalci Unije na trgu EU, bi bila zagotovitev podrobnejših informacij smiselna le, če bi bila podana individualno za vsakega proizvajalca.
This is however not possible since it would be in breach of the abovementioned confidentiality requirements.
To pa seveda ni mogoče, ker bi se s tem prekršile zgoraj navedene zahteve glede zaupnosti.
On these grounds, it is therefore considered that the detailed information on the methodology applied in calculating the duty (including among others the PCNs used and split by car maker) has provided the parties with sufficient information to allow them to fully exercise their rights of defence, while respecting the confidentiality requirements provided for in the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da so podrobne informacije o metodologiji, ki je bila uporabljena pri izračunu dajatve (med drugim vključno z uporabljenimi kontrolnimi številkami izdelkov in njihovo razdelitvijo po izdelovalcu avtomobilov), zagotovile stranem dovolj informacij, da so v celoti uveljavile svoje pravice do obrambe, in hkrati spoštovale zahteve glede zaupnosti, predvidene v osnovni uredbi.
It is recalled that underselling was computed on the basis of data relating to ARW purchases made by car makers.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila prodaja po nelojalno znižanih cenah izračunana na podlagi podatkov, ki se nanašajo na nakupe aluminijastih koles s strani izdelovalcev avtomobilov.
For the reasons set out in particular in recitals (174) – (177) of the provisional Regulation, this approach encompasses only ARWs destined for the OEM segment.
Iz razlogov, navedenih zlasti v uvodnih izjavah od (174) do (177) začasne uredbe, ta pristop zajema samo aluminijasta kolesa, namenjena za področje OEM.
Car makers which cooperate with the investigation confirmed that they purchase ARWs pursuant to tender proceedings.
Izdelovalci avtomobilov, ki sodelujejo v preiskavi, so potrdili, da kupujejo aluminijasta kolesa v skladu z razpisnimi postopki.
Given the nature of tender proceedings, models that are ‘dual-sourced’ have to be the same in all respects, whether purchased from the PRC or the EU.
Glede na naravo razpisnih postopkov morajo biti modeli, ki so „pridobljeni iz dveh virov“, v vseh pogledih enaki, ne glede na to, ali so kupljeni od LRK ali v EU.
In order to ensure the highest possible level of comparison between imported Chinese and EU products, comparison has been made PCN per PCN separately for each large car maker identified in the data supplied by both EU sampled producers and cooperating Chinese exporters.
Da bi zagotovili najvišjo možno raven primerjave med kitajskim uvozom in izdelki EU, je bila narejena primerjava posebej po posameznih PCN za vsakega velikega izdelovalca avtomobilov, ugotovljenega v podatkih, ki so jih dostavili vzorčeni proizvajalci EU in sodelujoči kitajski izvozniki.
Contrary to claims by some parties this level of duties is not an outcome of any kind of adjustment but it recognizes that the duty has to be set at a level appropriate to remedy the injury suffered by the Union industry.
V nasprotju s trditvami nekaterih strani ta raven dajatve ni rezultat nikakršne prilagoditve, ampak priznava, da mora biti dajatev postavljena na stopnji, ki ustreza odpravi škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Information used as the basis for the calculation
Informacije, uporabljene kot podlaga za izračun
Parties claimed that the injury elimination level calculation was conducted on the basis of tenders although information on tenders was neither requested in the investigation nor made available in the file open for consultation by interested parties.
Strani so trdile, da je bil izračun stopnje odprave škode izveden na podlagi razpisov, čeprav niso bile informacije o razpisih zahtevane niti v preiskavi niti dane na voljo v dokumentaciji, odprti za posvetovanje zainteresiranih strani.
Although tenders were mentioned in the description of the methodology applied to calculate the duty level, this reference was only a reference to the type of sourcing procedure applied by car makers which guaranteed that dual-sourced wheels would be the same and that a higher level of comparability could be achieved.
Čeprav so bili razpisi omenjeni v opisu metodologije, uporabljene za izračun stopnje dajatve, je bil ta sklic zgolj sklic na vrsto postopka nabave, ki ga uporabljajo izdelovalci avtomobilov, ki je zagotavljal, da so kolesa iz dveh virov enaka in da je mogoče doseči višjo raven primerljivosti.
It was not a reference to documentation or sources of information on the basis of which calculations were conducted.
To ni bil sklic na dokumentacijo ali vire informacij, na podlagi katerih so bili opravljeni izračuni.
To the contrary, the calculations were conducted in accordance with the usual practice on the basis of the transaction-by-transaction listings provided by the sampled exporting producers and EU manufacturers.
Nasprotno, izračuni so bili opravljeni v skladu z običajno prakso na podlagi seznama posamično navedenih transakcij, ki so ga zagotovili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki in proizvajalci EU.
The PCN matching was conducted at the level of car maker, i.e. within a group of transactions identified as exporters’ and EU producers’ sales to this specific car maker.
Ujemanje PCN je bilo opravljeno na ravni izdelovalca avtomobilov, to je znotraj skupine transakcij, identificiranih kot prodaja izvoznikov in proizvajalcev EU določenemu izdelovalcu avtomobilov.
These data were fully verified.
Ti podatki so bili v celoti preverjeni.
Parties’ comments further related to adjustments made in the calculation.
Pripombe strani se nanašajo tudi na prilagoditve vrednosti v izračunih.
The Commission accepted some of those comments.
Komisija je sprejela nekatere od teh pripomb.
It is recalled that the CIF prices of Chinese exporters were adjusted upwards by adding 7,6 %: 4,5 % customs duty plus 3,1 % other importation cost.
Opozoriti je treba, da so bile cene kitajskih izvoznikov na podlagi klavzule CIF prilagojene navzgor z dodatkom 7,6 %: 4,5 % carinske dajatve plus 3,1 % drugih uvoznih stroškov.
In order to construct a target price on the basis of the actual EU manufacturers’ sales price, two additions had to be made:
Da bi sestavili ciljno ceno na podlagi dejanske prodajne cene proizvajalcev EU, je bilo treba dodati dvoje:
add 5,4 % on a turnover basis to reach the level of cost of production (note that this is the weighted average loss for EU wheel producers found for the IP),
5,4 % na podlagi prometa, da bi dosegli raven stroškov proizvodnje (to je tehtana povprečna izguba za proizvajalce koles EU, ugotovljena za OP),
add 3,2 % on a turnover basis to cost of production (computed under (1)) to cater for a reasonable profit and to arrive at a target price.
3,2 % na podlagi prometa k stroškom proizvodnje (izračunanim pod (1)), da bi poskrbeli za razumen dobiček in dosegli ciljno ceno.
The 3,2 % correspond to the profit achieved by the Union industry in 2006, the first year of the period considered, when the financial results of Union producers were not yet affected by injurious dumping.
3,2 % ustreza dobičku, ki ga je industrija Unije dosegla leta 2006, v prvem letu obravnavanega obdobja, ko finančnih rezultatov proizvajalcev Unije še ni prizadel škodljivi damping.
As regards customs duties, at the provisional stage import prices have been adjusted upwards by 4,5 %.
Glede carinskih dajatev so bile uvozne cene na začasni stopnji prilagojene navzgor za 4,5 %.
This duty corresponds to the customs duty applied to CN code 87087050.
Ta dajatev ustreza carinski dajatvi, ki se uporablja za oznako KN 87087050.
However, it is CN code 87087010 which in principle concerns aluminium road wheels for the industrial assembly (i.e., OEM), and not CN code 87087050.
Vendar je oznaka KN 87087010 tista, ki se načeloma nanaša na aluminijasta kolesa za industrijsko sestavljanje (to je OEM), in ne oznaka KN 87087050.
A duty of 3 % is applicable to imports under this code.
Za uvoz pod to oznako se uporablja dajatev v višini 3 %.
Given the methodology used to determine the injury elimination level, which is based on the OEM segment, and in view of comments by parties after the imposition of provisional measures, it is appropriate, in order to ensure consistency in the approach, to use a duty rate of 3 %.
Glede metodologije, uporabljene za določitev stopnje odprave škode, ki temelji na področju OEM, in v zvezi s pripombami strani po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je zaradi zagotovitve skladnosti pristopa primerno, da se uporabi stopnja dajatve 3 %.
With regard to target profit parties claimed that this profit margin has been calculated for both OEM and AM producers and might thus inflate the calculation based on OEM transactions only.
V zvezi s ciljnim dobičkom so strani trdile, da je bila stopnja dobička izračunana za proizvajalce OEM in AM in lahko tako poveča izračun, ki temelji samo na transakcijah OEM.
In view of parties’ comments, the Commission adjusted these calculations by applying rates of loss and profit calculated for OEM wheels only (-5,7 % and 3,1 % respectively, see recital (106) et seq. above).
Glede na pripombe strani je Komisija prilagodila izračune z uporabo stopenj izgube in dobička, izračunanih samo za kolesa OEM (-5,7 % in 3,1 %, glej uvodno izjavo (106) in nadaljnje uvodne izjave zgoraj).
On the other hand parties argued that the level of profit should be adjusted downwards in order to reflect the impact of the crisis.
Po drugi strani so strani trdile, da bi morala biti raven dobička prilagojena navzdol, da bi odražala vpliv krize.
However, it is a consistent practice to apply the profit margin which the industry would have achieved in the absence of dumping practices.
Vendar je skladna praksa, da se uporabi stopnja dobička, ki bi jo industrija dosegla, če ne bi bilo praks dampinga.
Other causes of injury, even if contributing, are not singled out in the calculation of target profit.
Drugi vzroki škode, tudi če prispevajo, niso izločeni iz izračuna ciljnega dobička.
Certain parties claimed that the methodology used to calculate the injury elimination level was in breach of the methodology prescribed by the basic Regulation.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je metodologija, uporabljena za izračun stopnje odprave škode, kršila metodologijo, ki jo predpisuje osnovna uredba.
However, the basic Regulation does not prescribe any particular method to establish the injury elimination level.
Vendar osnovna uredba ne predpisuje nobene posebne metode za določitev stopnje odprave škode.
The method to establish such a level must be examined in terms of the specific facts of the case.
Metodo za določitev take stopnje je treba preučiti glede na posebna dejstva primera.
As explained in the provisional Regulation and elsewhere in this Regulation, the facts of the case support the use of the methodology applied by the Institutions.
Kot je razloženo v začasni uredbi in drugje v tej uredbi, dejstva primera podpirajo uporabo metodologije, ki so jo uporabile institucije.