natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The functioning of the current collection system is well established, including the implementation of the modifications introduced by Commission Decision 2005/366/EC of 4 March 2005 implementing Council Directive 95/64/EC on statistical returns in respect of carriage of goods and passengers by sea and amending Annexes thereto [4] and the geographical extension of the system due to the 2004 and 2007 enlargements of the Union.
Trenutni sistem zbiranja deluje in je uveljavljen, vključno z izvajanjem sprememb, uvedenih z Odločbo Komisije 2005/366/ES z dne 4. marca 2005 o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 95/64/ES o statističnih poročilih glede prevoza blaga in potnikov po morju in o spremembi prilog k Direktivi [4] ter geografsko razširitvijo sistema zaradi širitev Evropske unije v letih 2004 in 2007.
A large number of Member States transmitting data to the Commission (Eurostat) within the scope of Directive 95/64/EC have been regularly providing the Commission (Eurostat) with data set B1 on a voluntary basis in accordance with the NST/R classification.
Veliko število držav članic, ki Komisiji (Eurostatu) pošiljajo podatke v okviru področja uporabe Direktive 95/64/ES, redno pošilja Komisiji (Eurostatu) tudi podatkovni niz B1 na prostovoljni osnovi v skladu s klasifikacijo NST/R.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1304/2007 of 7 November 2007 with respect to the establishment of NST 2007 as the unique classification for transported goods in certain transport modes [5] introduced NST 2007 (Standard Goods Classification for Transport Statistics, 2007) as the unique classification for transported goods in maritime, road, rail and inland waterways transport.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1304/2007 z dne 7. novembra 2007 glede vzpostavitve NST 2007 kot enotne klasifikacije prepeljanega blaga pri nekaterih vrstah prevoza [5] je uvedla NST 2007 (Standardna klasifikacija blaga za statistiko prometa, 2007) kot enotno klasifikacijo za prepeljano blago v pomorskem, cestnem, železniškem prometu ter prometu pa celinskih plovnih poteh.
Therefore, for the most part, the collection of data set B1 will not impose any additional burden on respondents.
Zato zbiranje podatkovnega niza B1 večinoma ne bo pomenilo nobene dodatne obremenitve za dajalce podatkov.
In accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1172/98 of 25 May 1998 on statistical returns in respect of the carriage of goods by road [6], Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on rail transport statistics [7] and Regulation (EC) No 1365/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on statistics of goods transport by inland waterways [8], the collection of data by type of goods is mandatory for European statistics on road, rail, and inland waterways transport respectively, while it is voluntary for maritime transport.
V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) 1172/98 z dne 25. maja 1998 o statističnih poročilih v zvezi s cestnim prevozom blaga [6], Uredbo (ES) št. 91/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2002 o statistiki železniškega prometa [7] in Uredbo (ES) št. 1365/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2006 o statistiki prevoza blaga po celinskih plovnih poteh [8] je zbiranje podatkov po vrsti blaga obvezno za evropsko statistiko prometa po cestah, železnicah in celinskih plovnih poteh, medtem ko je za pomorski promet prostovoljno.
European statistics on all modes of transport should be collected in accordance with common concepts and standards, with the aim of achieving the fullest practicable comparability between transport modes.
Evropske statistične podatke o vseh vrstah prevoza je treba zbirati v skladu s skupnimi koncepti in standardi, s ciljem doseči najboljšo možno primerljivost med vrstami prevoza.
The introduction in 2011 of the obligation to provide the Commission (Eurostat) with data set B1, provides Member States with an adequate period of time during which a voluntary compilation could be used for the necessary tests and adaptations.
Uvedba obveznosti zagotovitve podatkovnega niza B1 Komisiji (Eurostatu) leta 2011 državam članicam zagotavlja primerno obdobje, v katerem bi lahko uporabile prostovoljno urejanje za potrebne teste in prilagoditve.
The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of certain detailed rules for implementing Directive 2009/42/EC.
Komisijo bi bilo treba pooblastiti, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejeme delegirane akte o nekaterih podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive 2009/42/ES.
Directive 2009/42/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Zato je treba Direktivo 2009/42/ES ustrezno spremeniti –
Directive 2009/42/EC is hereby amended as follows:
Direktiva 2009/42/ES se spremeni:
in Article 3(4), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
v členu 3(4) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘The Commission may adopt those measures by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 10a and subject to the conditions of Articles 10b and 10c.’;
„Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 10a in pod pogoji iz členov 10b in 10c te ukrepe sprejme z delegiranimi akti.“;
in Article 4(1), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
v členu 4(1) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Article 5, the third paragraph is replaced by the following:
v členu 5 se tretji odstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Article 10, paragraph 3 is deleted;
v členu 10 se črta odstavek 3;
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 3(4), Article 4(1) and the third paragraph of Article 5 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years from 29 December 2010.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 3(4), člena 4(1) in tretjega odstavka člena 5 se na Komisijo prenese za obdobje petih let od 29. decembra 2010.
The delegation of power shall be automatically extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council revokes it in accordance with Article 10b.
Prenos pooblastil se samodejno podaljša za enako obdobje, razen če Evropski parlament ali Svet pooblastilo prekliče v skladu s členom 10b.
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 10b and 10c.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov je prenešeno na Komisijo pod pogoji, določenimi v členu 10b in 10c.
Revocation of the delegation
Preklic prenesenih pooblastil
The delegation of power referred to in Article 3(4), Article 4(1) and the third paragraph of Article 5 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Pooblastilo iz člena 3(4), člena 4(1) in tretjega odstavka člena 5 lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke a delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated power which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek o morebitnem preklicu pooblastila, si prizadeva o tem obvestiti drugo institucijo in Komisijo v razumnem roku pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, ter pri tem navede pooblastila, ki bi se lahko preklicala, in možne razloge za preklic.
The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision.
Z odločitvijo o preklicu pooblastila preneha veljati pooblastilo, navedeno v tej odločitvi.
It shall take effect immediately or at a later date specified therein.
Odločitev začne veljati začne nemudoma ali na dan, ki je v njej določen.
The European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act within a period of 2 months from the date of notification.
1. Evropski parlament ali Svet lahko delegiranemu aktu nasprotujeta v dveh mesecih od datuma uradnega obvestila.
At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council that period shall be extended by 2 months.
Na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta se to obdobje podaljša za dva meseca.
If, on expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act, it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the date stated therein.
Če po izteku tega obdobja iz odstavka 1 niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotujeta delegiranemu aktu, se ta objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati na dan, naveden v tem aktu.
The delegated act may be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force before the expiry of that period if the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission of their intention not to raise objections.
Delegirani akt se lahko objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati pred iztekom navedenega roka, če Evropski parlament in Svet obvestita Komisijo, da delegiranemu aktu ne nameravata nasprotovati.
If either the European Parliament or the Council objects to the delegated act within the period referred to in paragraph 1, it shall not enter into force.
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet v obdobju iz odstavka 1 nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu, ta akt ne začne veljati.
The institution which objects shall state the reasons for objecting to the delegated act.’;
V skladu s členom 296 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije Institucija, ki ugovarja zoper delegirani akt, svojo odločitev utemelji.“;
the second paragraph of Annex VIII is deleted.
drugi odstavek Priloge VIII se črta.
The first reference year for the application of this Regulation shall be 2011, covering the 2011 data.
Prvo referenčno leto za uporabo te uredbe je leto 2011, ki zajema podatke za leto 2011.
Position of the European Parliament of 19 October 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 17 November 2010.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. oktobra 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2010.
Directive 95/64/EC has been repealed by Directive 2009/42/EC.
Direktiva 95/64/ES je bila razveljavljena z Direktivo 2009/42/ES.
That classification is applicable as from the reference year 2008, covering 2008 data.
Ta klasifikacija se uporablja od referenčnega leta 2008 in zajema podatke za leto 2008.
The main problems in compiling data by type of goods in accordance with NST/R classification, as mentioned in the Commission Report, have been solved by the introduction of NST 2007.
Glavne težave pri urejanju podatkov po vrsti blaga v skladu s klasifikacijo NST/R, kakor navaja poročilo Komisije, so bile odpravljene z uvedbo NST 2007.
Regulation (EU) No 1091/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1091/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 539/2001 o seznamu tretjih držav, katerih državljani morajo pri prehodu zunanjih meja imeti vizume, in držav, katerih državljani so oproščeni te zahteve
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(2)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 77(2)(a) Pogodbe,
The composition of the lists of third countries in Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 [2] should be, and should remain, consistent with the criteria laid down in recital 5 of that Regulation.
Sestava seznamov tretjih držav v prilogah I in II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001 [2] bi morala biti in še naprej ostati skladna z merili iz uvodne izjave 5 navedene uredbe.
Third countries for which the situation has changed as regards those criteria should be transferred from one Annex to the other.
Tretje države, v zvezi s katerimi so se razmere glede teh meril spremenile, bi bilo treba prenesti iz ene priloge v drugo.
In accordance with the political commitment made by the European Union on the liberalisation of the short-term visa requirement for citizens of the Western Balkan countries as part of the Thessaloniki Agenda and taking into consideration the progress made since December 2009 in the visa liberalisation dialogues with Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Commission considers that those two countries have met the benchmarks of their respective roadmaps.
V skladu s politično zavezo Evropske unije v zvezi z liberalizacijo obveznosti vizuma za kratkoročno bivanje za državljane vseh držav Zahodnega Balkana, ki je del Solunske agende, in glede na napredek v dialogih o liberalizaciji vizumskega režima z Albanijo ter Bosno in Hercegovino od decembra 2009, Komisija meni, da sta ti dve državi izpolnili merila iz svojih časovnih načrtov.
Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina should therefore be transferred to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Zato bi bilo treba Albanijo ter Bosno in Hercegovino prenesti v Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 539/2001.
Visa liberalisation should apply only to holders of biometric passports issued by each of those two countries.
Liberalizacija vizumov bi se morala uporabljati le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov, ki jih izdata ti dve državi.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point (B), of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [4].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [3], ki spadajo na področje iz točke (B) člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma [4].
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, points (B) and (C), of Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [6].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5], ki spadajo na področje iz točk (B) in (C) člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [6].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol signed between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, points (B) and (C) of Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/261/EC [7].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki spadajo na področje iz točk (B) in (C) člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/261/ES [7].
This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [8]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [8]; Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoča in se v njem ne uporablja.
This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [9]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [9]. Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
As regards Cyprus, this Regulation constitutes an act building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Za Ciper ta uredba predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 3(1) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003.
This Regulation constitutes an act building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the 2005 Act of Accession,
Ta uredba predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 4(1) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 –
in Annex I, Part 1, the references to Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina are deleted;
v delu 1 Priloge I se črta navajanje Albanije ter Bosne in Hercegovine;
in Annex II, Part 1, the terms ‘Albania (*)’ and ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina (*)’ are inserted in the list, where appropriate, with the following footnote:
v delu 1 Priloge II se izrazi „Albanija (*)“ ter „Bosna in Hercegovina (*)“ vstavijo v seznam kjer je ustrezno, z naslednjo opombo:
The exemption from the visa requirement applies only to holders of biometric passports.’.
Izvzetje iz vizumske obveznosti velja le za imetnike biometričnih potnih listov.“.
Position of the European Parliament of 7 October 2010 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 8 November 2010.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. oktobra 2010 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 8. novembra 2010.
Regulation (EU) No 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1092/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on European Union macro-prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board
o makrobonitetnem nadzoru nad finančnim sistemom Evropske unije in ustanovitvi Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 114 Pogodbe,
Financial stability is a precondition for the real economy to provide jobs, credit and growth.
Finančna stabilnost je predpogoj za zagotavljanje delovnih mest, kreditov in rasti v realnem gospodarstvu.
The financial crisis has revealed important shortcomings in financial supervision, which has failed to anticipate adverse macro-prudential developments and to prevent the accumulation of excessive risks within the financial system.
Finančna kriza je razkrila pomembne pomanjkljivosti na področju finančnega nadzora, ki ni uspel predvideti negativnega makrobonitetnega razvoja in preprečiti kopičenja prevelikih tveganj v finančnem sistemu.
The European Parliament called repeatedly for the reinforcement of a true level playing field for all actors at the level of the Union while pointing out significant failures in the Union’s supervision of ever more integrated financial markets (in its resolutions of 13 April 2000 on the Commission communication on implementing the framework for financial markets: Action Plan [4], of 21 November 2002 on prudential supervision rules in the European Union [5], of 11 July 2007 on financial services policy (2005 to 2010) – White Paper [6], of 23 September 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on hedge funds and private equity [7] and of 9 October 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on Lamfalussy follow-up: future structure of supervision [8], and in its positions of 22 April 2009 on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) [9] and of 23 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Credit Rating Agencies [10]).
Evropski parlament je vedno znova pozival h krepitvi resnično enakih pogojev za vse udeležence na ravni Unije in obenem opozarjal na precejšnje pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru Unije nad vedno bolj integriranimi finančnimi trgi (v svojih resolucijah z dne 13. aprila 2000 o sporočilu Komisije o izvajanju okvira za finančne trge: akcijski načrt [4], z dne 21. novembra 2002 o pravilih bonitetnega nadzora v Evropski uniji [5], z dne 11. julija 2007 o politiki finančnih storitev (2005–2010) – Bela knjiga [6], z dne 23. septembra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o hedge skladih in skladih zasebnega kapitala [7] in z dne 9. oktobra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o nadaljevanju Lamfalussyjevega procesa: prihodnja struktura nadzora [8] ter v svojih stališčih z dne 22. aprila 2009 o spremenjenem predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) [9] ter z dne 23. aprila 2009 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o bonitetnih agencijah [10]).
In November 2008, the Commission mandated a High-Level Group chaired by Jacques de Larosière to make recommendations on how to strengthen European supervisory arrangements with a view to better protecting the citizen and rebuilding trust in the financial system.
Novembra 2008 je Komisija pooblastila skupino na visoki ravni pod predsedstvom Jacquesa de Larosièra, da pripravi priporočila, kako okrepiti evropsko nadzorno ureditev, da bi se bolje zaščitili državljani in ponovno vzpostavilo zaupanje v finančni sistem.
In its final report presented on 25 February 2009 (the ‘de Larosière Report’), the High-Level Group recommended, inter alia, the establishment of a Union level body charged with overseeing risk in the financial system as a whole.
Skupina na visoki ravni je v končnem poročilu, ki ga je predstavila 25. februarja 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: de Larosièrovo poročilo), med drugim priporočila ustanovitev organa na ravni Unije, ki bi bil zadolžen za nadzor tveganj celotnega finančnega sistema.
In its Communication of 4 March 2009 entitled ‘Driving European Recovery’, the Commission welcomed and broadly supported the recommendations of the de Larosière Report.
Komisija je v sporočilu z dne 4. marca 2009 z naslovom „Spodbujanje okrevanja evropskega gospodarstva“ pozdravila in podprla priporočila de Larosièrovega poročila.