natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With respect to LUR it was argued that the Commission should have used the information submitted by the GOC which, according to the GOC, demonstrates the existence of a functioning market.
Glede pravic do uporabe zemljišč je kitajska vlada trdila, da bi Komisija morala uporabiti informacije, ki jih je kitajska vlada predložila in po njenem mnenju dokazujejo obstoj delujočega trga.
It was asserted that information required by the Commission on minimum prices of land-use rights was massive and it was not requested in the questionnaire or in advance before verification.
Trdila je, da so bile informacije, ki jih je Komisija zahtevala glede najnižjih cen pravic do uporabe zemljišč, zelo obsežne in niso bile zahtevane v vprašalniku ali vnaprej pred preverjanjem.
In this respect it is recalled that without having information on pricing on LUR it is not possible to arrive at any conclusion with respect to the existence of a functioning land market in China that reflects supply and demand forces.
S tem v zvezi je treba spomniti, da brez informacij o določanju cen pravic do uporabe zemljišč ni mogoče sprejeti sklepa glede obstoja delujočega trga zemljišč na Kitajskem, ki odraža učinek ponudbe in povpraševanja.
It is also noted that the Commission has offered ample time to the GOC to provide such information for the areas where the co-operating exporting producers are established but the GOC failed to submit even a single figure in this respect.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da je Komisija kitajski vladi nudila dovolj časa za predložitev takih informacij za območja, na katerih imajo sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki sedež, vendar kitajska vlada s tem v zvezi ni predložila niti enega samega podatka.
In any event the Commission followed the provisions of Annex VI of the SCM Agreement setting out the rules for on-the-spot verifications which inter alia allow requests made on-the-spot for further details in light of the information obtained.
V vsakem primeru je Komisija upoštevala določbe Priloge VI k Sporazumu SIU, ki določa pravila za preverjanja na kraju samem in med drugim ob upoštevanju pridobljenih informacij omogoča zahtevanje nadaljnjih podrobnosti na kraju samem.
ALLEGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE DEFINITION OF PUBLIC BODIES
TRDITVE V ZVEZI Z OPREDELITVIJO JAVNIH ORGANOV
The GOC argued that Government ownership is not a reasonable basis for finding a bank or a utility to be a public body and for such an analysis the Commission should use the EU State aid rules.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da vladno lastništvo ni utemeljena podlaga za ugotovitev, da je banka ali gospodarska javna služba javni organ in da bi morala Komisija za tako analizo uporabiti pravila državne pomoči EU.
The GOC also requested that on the basis of the findings of the WTO Appellate Body on the US – PRC dispute DS379 with respect to the definition of public body the current proceedings should be terminated.
Kitajska vlada je tudi zahtevala, da se na podlagi ugotovitev pritožbenega organa STO v zadevi ZDA – LRK DS379 glede opredelitve javnega organa sedanji postopek prekine.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission has explained under recital (90) above the definition of a public body.
S tem v zvezi je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija v uvodni izjavi (90) pojasnila opredelitev javnega organa.
This definition is in line with the relevant WTO case law on anti-subsidy proceedings including the aforesaid Appellate Body report.
Ta opredelitev je v skladu z ustrezno sodno prakso STO o protisubvencijskih postopkih, vključno s prej navedenim poročilom pritožbenega organa.
Thus, there is no need to depart from what is generally accepted and use another benchmark (i.e. the EU State aid rules) that applies to a very different branch of the law.
Zato odstopanje od tega, kar je splošno sprejeto, in uporaba drugega merila (npr. merila državne pomoči EU), ki velja za popolnoma drugačno vejo prava, nista potrebna.
Note that State aid law operates in a completely different context, i.e. not in order to regulate international trade in goods but as a complement to the common market.
Opozoriti je treba, da se zakonodaja o državni pomoči uporablja v popolnoma drugačnem okviru, tj. ne za urejanje mednarodne trgovine z blagom, ampak kot dopolnilo skupnemu trgu.
Finally there is no legal or factual basis to confirm the claim that the current proceedings should be terminated.
Nazadnje, ni nobene pravne ali dejanske podlage, ki bi potrdila zahtevo, da se sedanja preiskava prekine.
The GOC submitted with respect to preferential lending to the coated paper industry that the Commission failed to provide sufficient evidence of specific subsidization as required by Article 2(1)(a) of SCM Agreement and Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Kitajska vlada je v zvezi s preferenčnimi posojili industriji premazanega papirja navedla, da Komisija ni predložila dovolj dokazov glede specifičnega subvencioniranja, kot to zahtevata člen 2(1)(a) Sporazuma SIU in člen 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe.
It was submitted that the Commission analysis failed to fulfil its burden to establish de jure specificity of the alleged subsidy.
Navedeno je bilo, da analiza Komisije ni izpolnila svojega naloge glede določitve pravne specifičnosti domnevne subvencije.
Two cooperating exporting producers also claimed that the loans granted Chinese state owned banks were not specific.
Dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila tudi, da posojila, ki so jih dodeljevale kitajske državne banke, niso specifična.
In this respect it is recalled that specificity was established on the totality of information on file, including the information provided by the GOC, as listed under recital (92) above.
S tem v zvezi je treba spomniti, da je bila specifičnost ugotovljena na podlagi vseh informacij v spisu, vključno z informacijami, ki jih je predložila kitajska vlada, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (92).
This information confirms the existence of de jure specificity in line with the provisions of Article 2(1)(a) of SCM Agreement and Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Te informacije potrjujejo obstoj pravne specifičnosti v skladu z določbami člena 2(1)(a) Sporazuma SIU in člena 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The GOC also argued that the Commission failed to provide positive evidence of subsidisation in line with the provisions of Article 2(4) of the SCM Agreement and Article 4(5) of the basic Regulation since the evidence used by the Commission cannot be considered as positive evidence as it is not of an affirmative, objective and verifiable character which is credible.
Kitajska vlada je tudi trdila, da Komisija ni predložila trdnih dokazov o subvencioniranju v skladu z določbami člena 2(4) Sporazuma SIU in člena 4(5) osnovne uredbe, saj dokazov, ki jih je uporabila Komisija, ni mogoče šteti za trdne, ker nimajo pritrdilnega, objektivnega in preverljivega značaja, ki je verodostojen.
In this respect it is noted that the facts described under recital (92) above demonstrate positive evidence of specificity (i.e. specific subsidies granted through a sectoral industrial plan, the papermaking industry considered as an encouraged industry, the role of commercial banks and of the Chinese state planning system as well as the high credit rating of companies because they qualify for specific policy plans).
S tem v zvezi je treba opozoriti, da so dejstva, opisana v uvodni izjavi (92), trdni dokazi o specifičnosti (tj. specifične subvencije, odobrene prek sektorskega industrijskega načrta, obravnavanje industrije za izdelavo papirja kot spodbujane industrije, vloga komercialnih bank in kitajskega sistema državnega načrtovanja ter visoka bonitetna ocena podjetij, ker izpolnjujejo pogoje za posebne načrte politike).
This information is affirmative since it is clear, objective and convincing.
Te informacije so pritrdilne, saj so jasne, objektivne in prepričljive.
It is derived from various sources and was provided by interested parties or found in the public domain.
Pridobljene so iz različnih virov, zagotovile pa so jih zainteresirane strani ali pa so bile najdene v javni domeni.
With respect to the 2007 Papermaking Plan it was argued that it does not provide specific subsidies or preferential treatment to the papermaking industry.
Glede načrta za industrijo za izdelavo papirja 2007 je bilo navedeno, da industriji za izdelavo papirja ne zagotavlja specifičnih subvencij ali preferenčne obravnave.
According to the GOC the fact that this plan states that financial institutions shall not provide loans for any project which does not comply with its regulation is only a provision aimed to suspend projects which caused serious pollution.
Po navedbah kitajske vlade je dejstvo, da je v načrtu navedeno, da finančne ustanove ne smejo zagotoviti posojil za kateri koli projekt, ki ni v skladu z njeno zakonodajo, samo določba, namenjena opustitvi projektov, ki so povzročili resno onesnaženje.
In this respect it is noted that the wording used in the 2007 Papermaking Plan, as explained in detail in recital (77) above, leaves no doubt on the existence of specific subsidies and preferential treatment to the papermaking industry.
S tem v zvezi je treba opozoriti, da je iz načina ubeseditve, uporabljene v načrtu za industrijo za izdelavo papirja 2007, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (77), popolnoma jasno, da obstajajo specifične subvencije in preferenčna obravnava industrije za izdelavo papirja.
The claim that the detailed rules referring to financial institutions exist only for environmental reasons is not borne out by the actual wording of the relevant texts.
Trditev, da podrobna pravila, ki se nanašajo na finančne ustanove, obstajajo samo zaradi okoljskih razlogov, ne izhaja iz dejanske ubeseditve ustreznih besedil.
It was also argued that plans are too vague to be considered for the determination of specificity and the mere fact that the papermaking industry is an encouraged industry does not prove that GOC explicitly limits access to a subsidy to certain enterprises.
Kitajska vlada je tudi trdila, da so načrti preveč nejasni, da bi se upoštevali pri določanju specifičnosti, in da samo dejstvo, da je industrija za izdelavo papirja spodbujana industrija, ne dokazuje, da kitajska vlada izrecno omejuje dostop do subvencije na nekatera podjetja.
In this respect it is recalled that the investigation established that plans are legally binding for the reasons detailed in recital (78) above.
S tem v zvezi je treba spomniti, da je preiskava pokazala, da so načrti pravno zavezujoči zaradi razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodni izjavi (78).
The investigation also established that the status of ‘encouraged industry’ for the papermaking industry entails specific benefits to the relevant enterprises.
Preiskava je tudi pokazala, da status „spodbujane industrije“ za industrijo za izdelavo papirja zagotavlja posebne ugodnosti za zadevne družbe.
With respect to the attribution of loans it was argued that the analysis of the Annual Reports of Chinese banks that provided loans to cooperating exporting producers does not reveal that loans were granted because of policy plans.
Glede dodeljevanja posojil je bilo navedeno, da analiza letnih poročil kitajskih bank, ki so dodelile posojila sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ni pokazala, da so bila posojila dodeljena zaradi načrtov politike.
As noted above the Annual Reports of banks do not provide specific information on loan attribution to cooperating exporting producers.
Kot je bilo navedeno, letna poročila bank ne zagotavljajo posebnih informacij o dodeljevanju posojil sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
Indeed Annual Reports are general documents that do not provide any information on the way Chinese banks attributed loans to the co-operating exporting producers and the way the banks evaluated credit risk for the co-operating exporting producers.
Dejansko so letna poročila splošni dokumenti, ki ne zagotavljajo nobenih informacij o tem, kako so kitajske banke dodelile posojila sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in kako so banke ocenile kreditno tveganje za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike.
This information was repeatedly requested from interested parties and is considered crucial inter alia account taken of the finding of the IMF 2006 report which suggested that the bank liberalisation in China is incomplete and credit risk is not properly reflected [14], the IMF 2009 report which highlighted the lack of interest rate liberalization in China [15], the IMF 2010 Country Report which stated that cost of capital in China is relatively low, credit allocation is sometimes determined by non-price means and high corporate saving is partly linked to low cost of various factor inputs (including capital and land) [16], the OECD 2010 Economic Survey of China [17] and OECD Economic Department Working Paper No. 747 on China's Financial Sector Reforms [18] which stated that ownership of financial institutions remains dominated by the State raising issues as the extent which banks’ lending decisions are based purely on commercial considerations while banks’ traditional role appears to be that of government agencies with ties to the government.
Zainteresirane strani so večkrat zahtevale te informacije, ki se štejejo za bistvenega pomena, med drugim, ob upoštevanju ugotovitve poročila Mednarodnega denarnega sklada za leto 2006, ki je pokazalo, da je liberalizacija bank na Kitajskem nepopolna in da kreditno tveganje ni ustrezno upoštevano [14], poročila Mednarodnega denarnega sklada za leto 2009, ki je poudarilo pomanjkanje liberalizacije obrestne mere na Kitajskem [15], poročila Mednarodnega denarnega sklada o posameznih državah 2010, ki je navajalo, da so stroški kapitala na Kitajskem razmeroma nizki, da je dodeljevanje posojil včasih določeno z necenovnimi načini in da je veliko varčevanje pravnih oseb delno povezano z nizkimi stroški različnih faktorskih vložkov (vključno s kapitalom in zemljišči) [16], pregleda gospodarskih gibanj na Kitajskem 2010 Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj [17] in delovnega dokumenta ekonomskega oddelka OECD št. 747 o reformah kitajskega finančnega sektorja [18], ki je navajal, da glede lastništva finančnih institucij še vedno prevladuje država, zaradi česar se pojavljajo vprašanja glede obsega, v katerem odločitve bank glede posojil temeljijo samo na komercialnih premislekih, medtem ko je tradicionalna vloga bank očitno vloga vladnih agencij, ki so povezane z vlado.
With respect to the aforementioned credit rating note the GOC argued that a single credit rating note cannot be regarded as positive evidence on specificity.
Glede navedenega sporočila o bonitetni oceni je kitajska vlada trdila, da enega samega sporočila o bonitetni oceni ni mogoče šteti za trden dokaz o specifičnosti.
According to the GOC, unless most or even all of the loans granted to the cooperating exporting producers show that the industrial policy enables them to have higher credit rating during the IP, the Commission cannot apply the conditions of one specific instance to all loan decisions.
Po navedbah kitajske vlade, razen če večina posojil ali kar vsa posojila, ki so bila dodeljena sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, pokažejo, da jim industrijska politika omogoča višjo bonitetno oceno v OP, Komisija ne more uporabiti pogojev enega posebnega primera za vse odločitve glede posojil.
In this respect it is recalled that the credit rating note mentioned in recital (81) above links directly the positive future prospects of a cooperating exporting producer with the existence of the papermaking policy plans and the fulfilment of their objectives.
S tem v zvezi je treba spomniti, da sporočilo o bonitetni oceni, navedeno v uvodni izjavi (81), neposredno povezuje pozitivne prihodnje možnosti sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika z obstojem načrtov politike za industrijo za izdelavo papirja in izpolnitvijo njihovih ciljev.
In order to arrive at its conclusions, the Commission placed considerable emphasis on this document in conjunction with the Papermaking plan because other information requested in this context, such as the risk assessment for loans, was not provided despite repeated requests, as described above.
Da bi lahko prišla do tega zaključka, je Komisija dala znaten poudarek na ta dokument v povezavi z načrtom za izdelavo papirja, ker druge informacije, zahtevane s tem v zvezi, kot je ocena tveganja za posojila, kljub večkratnim zahtevam niso bile zagotovljene, kot je opisano zgoraj.
The GOC also argued that the Commission failed to take into account when analyzing allegations on preferential lending the PBOC Circular on Improving the Administration of Special Loans YINFA [1999] No. 228.
Kitajska vlada je tudi trdila, da Komisija pri analizi trditev o preferenčnih posojilih ni upoštevala Okrožnice Ljudske banke Kitajske o izboljšanju upravljanja posebnih posojil YINFA [1999] št. 228.
According to the GOC the aforesaid circular confirms that preferential lending or special loans have been eliminated.
Glede na navedbe kitajske vlade ta okrožnica potrjuje, da so bila preferenčna posojila ali posebna posojila ukinjena.
In this respect it is recalled that as explained in recital (87) above the Commission found that more recent PBOC circulars than the 1999 circular exist that clearly mention the existence of preferential loans and other loans specified by State Council.
S tem v zvezi je treba spomniti, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (87), da je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo novejše okrožnice Ljudske banke Kitajske, kot je tista iz leta 1999, ki jasno navajajo obstoj preferenčnih posojil in drugih posojil, ki jih je opredelil državni svet.
Thus, the arguments of GOC on the abolition of preferential lending and special loans cannot be supported by the actual case facts.
Zato konkretna dejstva primera ne potrjujejo trditve kitajske vlade o ukinitvi preferenčnih posojil in posebnih posojil.
Notwithstanding the above, it is pertinent to note that the 1999 circular states that wholly State-owned banks shall actively communicate with the authorities in charge of the relevant industries with a view to gaining their understanding and support.
Glede na navedeno je primerno opozoriti, da okrožnica iz leta 1999 navaja, da morajo banke, ki so v celoti v državni lasti, dejavno sodelovati z organi, ki so odgovorni za zadevne industrije, da pridobijo njihovo razumevanje in podporo.
This again is a statement that confirms the control that State authorities exercise over wholly State-owned banks.
To je ponovno izjava, ki potrjuje izvajanje nadzora državnih organov nad bankami, ki so v celoti v državni lasti.
With respect to the evidence of specificity submitted by the complainant it was argued that this is only references of findings of the various U.S. investigations where specificity was established, inter alia, by reference to five-year plans.
Glede dokazov o specifičnosti, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, je bilo navedeno, da so to samo navedbe ugotovitev različnih ameriških preiskav, v katerih je bila ugotovljena specifičnost, med drugim, s sklicevanjem na petletne načrte.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission used all the relevant information it had in its disposal in order to arrive at a representative finding.
S tem v zvezi je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija, da bi prišla do reprezentativne ugotovitve, uporabila vse ustrezne informacije, ki jih je imela na voljo.
In this manner, the publicly available information stated in the complaint, even if referring to findings of other investigating authorities, was deemed to be relevant and its use was appropriate.
Tako se javno dostopne informacije, navedene v pritožbi, tudi če se nanašajo na ugotovitve drugih preiskovalnih organov, štejejo za pomembne in njihova uporaba za ustrezno.
With respect to Decision 40 and the Directory Catalogue it was argued that they do not explicitly define the coated fine paper industry as encouraged industry or encouraged projects.
Glede sklepa št. 40 in kataloškega seznama je bilo navedeno, da industrije premazanega finega papirja ne opredeljujeta izrecno kot spodbujano industrijo ali spodbujane projekte.
It was also argued that the term ‘encouraged projects’ in China spans broad sectors of economy activity, covering various industries.
Navedeno je bilo tudi, da izraz „spodbujani projekti“ na Kitajskem zajema številne sektorje gospodarske dejavnosti in obsega različne industrije.
In this respect it is recalled that Decision 40 and the Directory Catalogue define the papermaking industry, to which the coated fine paper industry belongs, as an encouraged industry or encouraged projects.
S tem v zvezi je treba spomniti, da sklep št. 40 in kataloški seznam industrijo za izdelavo papirja, v katero sodi industrija premazanega finega papirja, opredeljujeta kot spodbujano industrijo ali spodbujane projekte.
With respect to encouraged projects it is recalled that these cover only certain activities within 26 sectors and thus this categorisation, covering only a subset of enterprises in China, cannot be considered as of a general nature and non-specific.
Glede spodbujanih projektov je treba spomniti, da ti obsegajo samo določene dejavnosti iz 26 sektorjev in da zato te kategorizacije, ki obsega samo podmnožico družb na Kitajskem, ni mogoče šteti za kategorizacijo, ki je splošne narave in nespecifična.
The Commission considered this as the most natural interpretation in the absence of any explanation (and corroborating documents) as to how the GOC precisely applied the notion of the ‘papermaking industry’ e.g. for the purposes of Decision 40 and the Directory Catalogue.
Po mnenju Komisije je bila to ob pomanjkanju kakršne koli razlage (in dodatnih dokumentov) najbolj naravna razlaga glede tega, kako natančno je kitajska vlada uporabila pojem „industrije za izdelavo papirja“ npr. za namene sklepa št. 40 in kataloškega seznama.
With respect to the Law on Commercial Banks, the GOC argued that Article 34 is of a general nature and that, in line with the provisions of Article 41 of the same law, there is no mandatory obligation for commercial banks to provide loans based on the industrial policies.
Glede Zakona o komercialnih bankah je kitajska vlada trdila, da je člen 34 splošne narave in da v skladu s členom 41 istega zakona ni nobene obveznosti za komercialne banke, da dodelijo posojila na podlagi industrijskih politik.
In this respect it is noted that the wording of Article 34 links directly commercial banks’ loan business with the State's industrial policies.
S tem v zvezi je treba opozoriti, da besedilo člena 34 neposredno povezuje posojilno poslovanje komercialnih bank z industrijskimi politikami države.
Thus, it cannot be considered of a general and non-compulsory nature.
Zato člena ni mogoče šteti za splošnega in neobveznega.
With respect to Article 41 of the aforesaid law it is noted that this refers to the prerogative of a commercial bank to provide loans to parties but it does not refer to the conditions that banks will have to take into consideration when taking loan decisions.
Glede člena 41 omenjenega zakona je treba opozoriti, da se nanaša na posebno pravico komercialne banke, da zagotovi posojila stranem, vendar se ne nanaša na pogoje, ki jih morajo banke upoštevati, ko se odločajo o posojilih.
APP claimed it has provided the Commission with sufficient information and documents showing that APP was rated A-1 by Moody's in 2007 and 2008 and therefore it was not correct that the Commission disregarded this rating and applied Bloomberg's BB rating.
APP je trdila, da je Komisiji predložila zadostne informacije in dokumente, ki kažejo, da je agencija Moody's v letih 2007 in 2008 APP ocenila z oceno A-1, zato ni bilo prav, da Komisija te ocene ni upoštevala in je uporabila oceno BB Bloomberga.
The Commission closely analysed credit rating reports submitted by APP group.
Komisija je natančno preučila poročila o bonitetni oceni, ki jih je predložila skupina APP.
These credit rating reports are linking the promising future outlook of the paper industry to the promulgation of the Paper Industry Development Policy.
Ta poročila o bonitetni oceni povezujejo obetavne možnosti papirne industrije v prihodnosti z objavo razvojne politike za papirno industrijo.