natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Despite the change in ownership mentioned in recital 58, it was considered that the data provided by and verified at the premises of the complainant who withdrew, should not automatically be excluded from the injury analysis since its production remains part of the Union production.
Kljub spremembi lastništva iz uvodne izjave 58 je prevladalo mnenje, da se podatki, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, ki se je umaknil, in ki so se preverili v prostorih tega pritožnika, ne smejo samodejno izključiti iz analize škode, ker so še vedno del proizvodnje Unije.
Some parties argued that some data provided by the Union industry, in particular regarding their purchases of the product concerned originating in India, Malaysia and Indonesia, should be excluded from the injury analysis and the injury margin calculation because any alleged injury relating to these purchases would be self-inflicted.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da je treba nekatere podatke, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije, zlasti v zvezi z nakupi zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Indije, Malezije in Indonezije, izključiti iz analize škode in izračuna stopnje škode, ker bi bila vsaka domnevna škoda v zvezi s temi nakupi samopovzročena.
However, as stated in recital 63 of the provisional Regulation, these purchases were mainly due to the temporary closure of one of the production sites of one producer.
Vendar, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 63 začasne uredbe, so bili ti nakupi zlasti posledica začasnega zaprtja enega od proizvodnih obratov enega proizvajalca.
Moreover, these purchases were not substantial in comparison with the total production of the complainants.
Poleg tega so bili ti nakupi nebistveni v primerjavi s skupno proizvodnjo pritožnikov.
There were therefore no compelling reasons for excluding the purchases of the said producers from the injury analysis or the injury elimination level calculation.
Zato ni bilo utemeljenih razlogov za izključitev nakupov navedenih proizvajalcev iz analize škode in izračuna stopnje odprave škode.
The preliminary remarks as mentioned in recital 76 of the provisional Regulations are hereby confirmed.
Uvodne opombe iz uvodne izjave 76 začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation, sales and market share
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, prodaja in tržni delež
In the absence of comments concerning production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales and market share of the Union industry, recitals 77 to 81 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s proizvodnjo, proizvodno zmogljivostjo in izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti, prodajo in tržnim deležem industrije Unije ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 77 do 81 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
After the publication of the provisional Regulation, it was found that corrections had to be made to the average unit prices of the Union industry due to a clerical error.
Po objavi začasne uredbe je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zaradi stvarnih napak potrebni popravki povprečnih cen na enoto industrije Unije.
The table below shows the modified trend in unit price of the Union industry during the period considered.
V spodnji preglednici je prikazan spremenjeni trend cene na enoto industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju.
Unit price, sales in the Union to unrelated
Cena na enoto pri prodaji nepovezanim v EU
Contrary to what is mentioned in recital 84 of the provisional Regulation, prices of the Union industry decreased by 4 % during the period considered.
V nasprotju z navedbo iz uvodne izjave 84 začasne uredbe so se cene industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšale za 4 %.
The decrease was significant from 2008 to 2009 with a further decrease in the IP.
V obdobju od leta 2008 do leta 2009 je zmanjšanje bilo bistveno, z nadaljnjim zmanjšanjem v OP.
Over this period the sales price decreased by 22 %.
V tem obdobju se je prodajna cena zmanjšala za 22 %.
The above change has no impact on the conclusion of the economic situation of the Union industry, in the absence of comments regarding the average unit prices of the Union industry, recitals 82 and 83 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Navedene spremembe nimajo vpliva na sklepe o gospodarskem stanju industrije Unije in ker v zvezi s povprečnimi cenami na enoto industrije Unije ni bilo pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 82 in 83 začasne uredbe potrdita.
Stocks, employment, wages and productivity, profitability, cash flow, investments return on investment and ability to raise capital, growth, magnitude of the actual dumping margin
Zaloge, zaposlenost, plače in produktivnost, dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb in zmožnost zbiranja kapitala, rast, višina dejanske stopnje dampinga
Some parties claimed that it was not possible that the Union industry suffered injury since companies that are part of the Union industry are vertically integrated and imported the product concerned from third countries.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da industrija Unije ni mogla utrpeti škode, ker so družbe, ki so del industrije Unije, vertikalno integrirane in so zadevni izdelek uvažale iz tretjih držav.
Therefore they could use the imported product for their downstream production and sell their production which is not profitable.
Zato bi lahko uvoženi izdelek uporabile v svoji nadaljnji proizvodnji in prodale proizvodnjo, ki ni dobičkonosna.
It should be noted that in certain anti-dumping investigations, producers such as steel producers and chemical products manufacturers, included in the definition of the Union industry in these cases, have a downstream activity and that a share of their production of the product concerned is destined for captive use.
Opozoriti je treba, da v določenih protidampinških preiskavah proizvajalci, kot so proizvajalci jekla in proizvajalci kemičnih izdelkov, ki so vključeni v opredelitev industrije Unije, v teh primerih opravljajo dejavnost nadaljnje proizvodnje in da je delež njihove proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka namenjen lastni uporabi.
Nevertheless, in such a situation, the possible existence of material injury to the Union industry is investigated exclusively for the production and sales of the product concerned.
Kljub temu se v takem primeru preiskava morebitne povzročitve znatne škode industriji Unije opravi izključno za proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka.
In the present case, material injury has been found in the business of the product concerned as explained in recitals 77 to 93 of the provisional Regulation.
V tem primeru je bila znatna škoda ugotovljena v zvezi s poslovanjem z zadevnim izdelkom, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 77 do 93 začasne uredbe.
The parties did not provide any evidence which would show that the findings in these recitals are not correct and that the Union industry did not suffer material injury during the IP.
Strani niso predložile nobenih dokazov o tem, da so ugotovitve iz teh uvodnih izjav nepravilne in da industrija Unije v OP ni utrpela znatne škode.
Some parties claimed that the closure of certain production capacity by the complainants showed a misleading picture of the alleged injury they suffered.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da so pritožniki z zaprtjem nekaterih proizvodnih zmogljivosti ustvarili zavajajoč vtis o domnevni škodi, ki so jo utrpeli.
They argued that there were other producers in the Union that contributed to the capacity in the Union and that the capacity of the Union industry increased with investments in new capacity.
Trdile so, da so k zmogljivosti Unije prispevali drugi proizvajalci v Uniji in da se je zmogljivost industrije Unije povečala z naložbami v nove zmogljivosti.
This is hardly indicative of an injured industry.
To komajda dokazuje škodo industrije.
Other parties claimed that the reduction of investment does not mean injury, but means relocation of production out of the Union.
Druge strani so trdile, da zmanjšanje naložb ne pomeni škode, ampak premestitev proizvodnje izven Unije.
The investigation established in recital 78 of the provisional Regulation that the production capacity of the Union industry increased by 9 % in 2008 but that it then decreased by 10 % during the IP.
V skladu z ugotovitvijo preiskave iz uvodne izjave 78 začasne uredbe se je proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Unije leta 2008 povečala za 9 %, vendar se je potem v OP zmanjšala za 10 %.
This was the result of decisions undertaken in order to face the competition from the countries concerned, and the subsequent temporary closures were also due to the pressure exerted by the dumped imports.
Razlog za to so bili sklepi, ki so bili sprejeti zaradi soočanja s konkurenco iz zadevnih držav, pri čemer so bila poznejša začasna zaprtja tudi posledica pritiska zaradi dampinškega uvoza.
With regard to investments, it was established in recital 89 of the provisional Regulation that investments made by the Union industry in the Union decreased by 35 % during the period considered.
V zvezi z naložbami je v uvodni izjavi 89 začasne uredbe navedeno, da so se naložbe industrije Unije v Uniji v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšale za 35 %.
This is one of several injury factors which allowed concluding in recitals 92 and 93 of the provisional Regulation that the Union industry suffered material injury during the IP.
To je eden od več dejavnikov škode, na podlagi katerih je bilo v uvodnih izjavah 92 in 93 začasne uredbe sklenjeno, da je industrija Unije v OP utrpela znatno škodo.
In the absence of other comments concerning stocks, employment, wages and productivity, profitability, cash flow, investments return on investments and ability to raise capital, growth and magnitude of the actual dumping margin, recitals 85 to 91 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z zalogami, zaposlitvijo, plačami in produktivnostjo, dobičkonosnostjo, denarnim tokom, naložbami, donosnostjo naložb in zmožnostjo zbiranja kapitala, rastjo in višino dejanske stopnje dampinga ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 85 do 91 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Post IP developments
Razvoj po OP
Some parties argued that there was no evidence of material injury suffered by the Union industry and the fact that one of the two original complainants had withdrawn its support to the investigation showed that it was not suffering injury.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da ni dokazov, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo, pri čemer je dejstvo, da je eden od dveh prvotnih pritožnikov umaknil podporo preiskavi, dokazovalo, da ni utrpel škode.
It was also argued that the injury indicators for the remaining complainant did not show a picture of injury.
Prav tako so trdile, da kazalniki škode za preostalega pritožnika niso dokazovali škode.
It should be noted that the company in question did not oppose to the investigation but took a neutral position.
Opozoriti je treba, da zadevna družba ni nasprotovala preiskavi, ampak je zavzela nevtralno stališče.
Therefore, as explained in recital 57, it was still considered appropriate to keep both Union producers as part of the Union industry.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 57, se je zato še vedno štelo za primerno, da se oba proizvajalca Unije ohranita kot del industrije Unije.
It was claimed that there has been a marked increase of prices in the post-IP period, and that these price developments in that period will immediately translate into profits for the complainants who themselves announced better results in their public statements for the period 2010-2011.
Strani so trdile, da so se v obdobju po OP občutno zvišale cene in da bo ta razvoj cen v navedenem obdobju nemudoma prinesel dobiček pritožnikoma, ki sta v svojih javnih izjavah za obdobje 2010–2011 sama napovedala boljše rezultate.
Some parties insisted that there was a significant improvement in the situation of the Union industry in the post-IP period pointing out that some companies were planning to build new facilities in the Union.
Nekatere strani so vztrajale, da so se razmere v industriji Unije v obdobju po OP bistveno izboljšale, pri čemer so izpostavile, da so nekatere družbe načrtovale gradnjo novih obratov v Uniji.
It was also claimed that in view of the recent increase in import prices, measures should be suspended or imposed in the form of a minimum import price (MIP).
Trdile so tudi, da bi bilo treba glede na nedavno zvišanje uvoznih cen opustiti ali uvesti ukrepe v obliki minimalne uvozne cene.
Events that occurred after the IP shall normally not be taken into account in an anti-dumping investigation.
Poleg tega niso bili predloženi nobeni dokazi o očitnosti, nespornosti in trajnosti navedenih dogodkov po OP.
In addition, no evidence that suggests that the mentioned post-IP events are manifest, undisputed and lasting was provided.
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazano, da so navedeni dogodki po OP jasni, nesporni in trajni.
Concerning any suspension of the definitive measures, this should be seen in the light of post-IP developments which would be of a lasting nature.
V zvezi s kakršno koli opustitvijo dokončnih ukrepov je to treba obravnavati ob upoštevanju dogodkov po OP, ki bi bili trajni.
As to the imposition of an MIP, as explained in recitals 123 to 126 it is considered that the circumstances are not such as to warrant it.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 123 do 126 se glede uvedbe minimalne uvozne cene šteje, da jih dane okoliščine ne utemeljujejo.
Therefore all the above claims are dismissed.
Zato se vse navedene trditve zavrnejo.
The Investigation confirmed that most of the injury indicators pertaining to the Union industry showed a declining trend during the period considered.
Preiskava je potrdila, da je večina kazalnikov škode v zvezi z industrijo Unije v obravnavanem obdobju pokazala padajoči trend.
Based on the above, the conclusion reached in recitals 92 and 93 of the provisional Regulation that the Union industry suffered material injury during the IP is confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega se potrdi sklepna ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav 92 in 93 začasne uredbe, da je industrija Unije v OP utrpela znatno škodo.
One party observed that the analysis in recital 108 of the provisional Regulation is flawed, because it seems to link an overall and continuous decrease in consumption to the increase in imports, whereas, according to this party, imports from the countries concerned developed in line with consumption.
Ena stran je ugotovila, da je analiza iz uvodne izjave 108 začasne uredbe pomanjkljiva, ker se zdi, da povezuje splošno in stalno zmanjševanje potrošnje z večanjem uvoza, medtem ko se je po navedbah te strani uvoz iz zadevnih držav razvijal v skladu s potrošnjo.
It should be clarified indeed that, as mentioned in recitals 64 to 66 of the provisional Regulation, consumption overall increased by 2 % during the period considered.
Pojasniti je treba, da se je potrošnja, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 64 do 66 začasne uredbe, v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno dejansko povečala za 2 %.
However, this does not undermine the fact that there was an important overall increase in volume and market share of the low-priced dumped imports from the countries concerned during the period considered (see recital 96 of the provisional Regulation), whereas the market size remained nearly unchanged, and while the Union industry lost an important market share, in particular between 2009 and the IP.
Vendar to ne spremeni dejstva, da sta se v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno bistveno povečala obseg in tržni delež nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav (glej uvodno izjavo 96 začasne uredbe), medtem ko se velikost trga skoraj ni spremenila, industrija Unije pa je izgubila znaten tržni delež, zlasti med letom 2009 in OP.
Some parties made the argument that the trends of imports from the countries concerned are not linked to the deterioration of economic situation of the Union industry, in particular sales volume, sales values and profitability.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da trendi uvoza iz zadevnih držav niso povezani s slabšanjem gospodarskega položaja industrije Unije, zlasti z obsegom prodaje, prodajnimi vrednostmi in dobičkonosnostjo.
They argue that there was an improvement in profitability of the Union industry when the imports increased in 2008, and then it fell significantly when imports remained stable.
Trdile so, da se je dobičkonosnost industrije Unije povečala, ko se je leta 2008 povečal uvoz, in se potem bistveno zmanjšala, čeprav je uvoz ostal nespremenjen.
Contrary to the above allegation, the investigation pointed to an overall correlation between the low-priced dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry during the whole period considered (see recitals 95 to 98 of the provisional Regulation).
V nasprotju z navedenimi domnevami je preiskava izpostavila splošno povezavo med nizkocenovnim dampinškim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je industrija Unije utrpela v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju (glej uvodne izjave 95 do 98 začasne uredbe).
The investigation also showed that the Union industry could not recover in the period considered due to the increased presence of low-priced dumped imports on the Union market.
Preiskava je tudi pokazala, da industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju ni mogla okrevati zaradi povečanja nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza na trgu Unije.
Hence, the claim should be rejected.
Zato je treba trditev zavrniti.
It was also claimed that differences in trends in imports existed depending on the types of alcohol produced by some exporting producers, and that therefore, a separate injury analysis for these alcohols should be performed.
Strani so tudi trdile, da so bile razlike v trendih uvoza odvisne od vrst alkohola, ki so jih proizvajali nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki, in da je zato treba za te alkohole opraviti ločeno analizo škode.
However, the different types included in the product scope share the same basic characteristics.
Vendar imajo obravnavane različne vrste enake osnovne značilnosti.
The investigation did not reveal any substantial difference between FOH produced from different raw materials.
V preiskavi niso bile ugotovljene bistvene razlike med maščobnimi alkoholi in njihovimi mešanicami, ki so proizvedeni iz različnih surovin.
Therefore there are no reasons in this case to establish a separate analysis of the trends per type of alcohol.
Zato v tem primeru ni razlogov za uvedbo ločenih analiz trendov glede na posamezno vrsto alkohola.
It was also argued that injury could not be attributed to India because its imports did not increase during the period considered, in particular when purchases by the Complainants are not taken into account.
Prav tako so strani trdile, da škode ni mogoče pripisati Indiji, ker se njen uvoz v obravnavanem obdobju ni povečal, zlasti če se ne upoštevajo nakupi pritožnikov.
However, it was found that the imports from India were made at dumped prices in the Union market and that the injury margin was largely above the de minimis level of 2 %.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil uvoz iz Indije na trg Unije izveden po dampinških cenah in da je stopnja škode močno presegala 2-odstotni prag de minimis.
Moreover, as explained in recitals 63 to 65, the conditions for a cumulative assessment for the countries concerned were met.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 63 do 65, so bili poleg tega izpolnjeni pogoji za izvedbo kumulativne ocene za zadevne države.
This claim should thus be rejected.
Zato je treba trditev zavrniti.
It was also argued that injury could not be attributed to the companies whose individual undercutting margin was negative, or because of this reason, to imports from Indonesia as a whole.
Strani so tudi trdile, da škode ni mogoče pripisati družbam, katerih stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen je bila negativna, ali na podlagi tega celotnemu uvozu iz Indonezije.
As explained in recitals 63 to 65, all the conditions of a cumulative assessment of the imports concerned were met.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 63 do 65, so bili izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za izvedbo kumulativne ocene zadevnega uvoza.
Accordingly, the effects the low-priced dumped imports originating in the countries concerned had on the Union industry were assessed jointly for the purpose of the injury analysis and the cause of the injury.
V skladu s tem so se učinki nizkocenovnega dampinškega uvoza s poreklom iz zadevnih držav na industrijo Unije ocenili skupaj za namene analize škode in vzroka škode.
Furthermore, the absence of undercutting does not exclude the existence of material injury to the Union industry.
Poleg tega odsotnost nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen ne izključuje povzročitve znatne škode industriji Unije.
Indeed, as explained in recitals 124 to 127 of the provisional Regulation it was found that the price charged by the Union industry was not sufficient to cover all production costs and achieve the reasonable margin of profit it could have achieved in the absence of dumped imports during the IP.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 124 do 127 začasne uredbe, je bilo dejansko ugotovljeno, da cena, ki jo je zaračunavala industrija Unije, ni bila dovolj visoka, da bi z njo krila vse proizvodne stroške in dosegla razumno stopnjo dobička, ki bi jo lahko dosegla, če v OP ne bi bilo dampinškega uvoza.
In the absence of any other comments regarding effects of the dumped imports, recitals 95 to 98 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z učinki dampinškega uvoza ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 95 do 98 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Several parties have argued that the real cause of injury suffered by the Union industry should be attributed to the financial crisis, as the main harm to that industry occurred when imports from the countries concerned stabilised.
Več strani je trdilo, da je treba resnični vzrok vsakršne škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, pripisati finančni krizi, saj je bila zadevna industrija najbolj prizadeta, ko se je uvoz iz zadevnih držav stabiliziral.
It was also mentioned that the deterioration of the profitability of the Union industry was similar to that observed for other companies operating in the chemical sector.
Navedle so tudi, da je bilo zmanjševanje dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije podobno zmanjševanju, ugotovljenemu pri drugih družbah, ki delujejo v kemičnem sektorju.
The crisis played a role in the performance of the Union industry.
Kriza je vplivala na uspešnost industrije Unije.
Trends in injury factors such as capacity utilisation and sales volume show that the situation of the Union industry worsened with the crisis and somewhat improved with the recovery in the market.
Trendi dejavnikov škode, kot sta izkoriščanje zmogljivosti in obseg prodaje, kažejo, da se je položaj industrije Unije s krizo poslabšal, z okrevanjem trga pa nekoliko izboljšal.
However, the investigation showed that the improvement did not allow the recovery of the Union industry which was far from its economic situation that prevailed at the beginning of the period considered.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da izboljšanje ni omogočilo okrevanja industrije Unije, katere gospodarski položaj je bil veliko slabši od položaja, ki je prevladoval na začetku obravnavanega obdobja.
Furthermore, as mentioned in recital 89, 2008, just before the financial crisis started, was the year with the highest increase in dumped imports from the countries concerned and the sharpest decrease in sales volume of the Union industry.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 89, je bilo leta 2008 tik pred začetkom finančne krize povečanje dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav največje, obseg prodaje industrije Unije pa se je najmočneje zmanjšal.
After that year the Union industry did not recover and the dumped imports continued to be massively present in the Union market.
Po tem letu si industrija Unije ni opomogla in dampinški uvoz je bil na trgu Unije še naprej močno prisoten.
For these reasons it is clear that, regardless of other factors, dumped imports largely contributed to the material injury suffered by the Union industry during the IP.
Zato je ne glede na druge dejavnike jasno, da je dampinški uvoz v veliki meri prispeval k znatni škodi, ki jo je industrija Unije utrpela v OP.