natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Decision 2010/603/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2010/603/SZVP
of 7 October 2010
z dne 7. oktobra 2010
On 11 October 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/694/CFSP on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [1], with the aim of freezing all funds and economic resources belonging to all persons who have been indicted by the ICTY for war crimes but who are not in the custody of the ICTY.
Svet je 11. oktobra 2004 sprejel Skupno stališče 2004/694/SZVP o nadaljnjih ukrepih v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSJ) [1], da bi zamrznili vsa sredstva in gospodarske vire vseh oseb, ki jih je MKSJ obtožilo vojnih hudodelstev in ki niso v priporu MKSJ.
That Common Position was extended by Common Position 2009/717/CFSP [2] until 10 October 2010.
Navedeno skupno stališče je bilo podaljšano s Skupnim stališčem 2009/717/SZVP [2] do 10. oktobra 2010.
The restrictive measures should be extended for a further year until 10 October 2011.
Omejevalne ukrepe bi bilo treba podaljšati še za eno leto, torej do 10. oktobra 2011.
The Union implementing measures are set out in Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 of 11 October 2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [3],
Izvedbeni ukrepi Unije so navedeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1763/2004 z dne 11. oktobra 2004 o uvedbi določenih omejevalnih ukrepov v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSJ) [3] –
All funds and economic resources belonging to the natural persons listed in the Annex, who have been indicted by the ICTY, shall be frozen.
Vsa sredstva in vsi gospodarski viri, ki pripadajo fizičnim osebam, obtoženim pred MKSJ, ki so navedene v Prilogi, se zamrznejo.
No funds or economic resources shall be made available directly or indirectly to or for the benefit of the natural persons listed in the Annex.
Fizičnim osebam, navedenim v Prilogi, se niti neposredno niti posredno ne dajejo na voljo ali v njihovo korist nobena sredstva ali gospodarski viri.
necessary for basic expenses, including payments for foodstuffs, rent or mortgage, medicines and medical treatment, taxes, insurance premiums, and public utility charges;
potrebni za kritje osnovnih stroškov, vključno s plačili za živila, najemnine ali hipoteke, zdravila in zdravljenja, davkov, zavarovalnih premij in komunalnih storitev;
Paragraph 2 shall not apply to the addition to frozen accounts of:
Odstavek 2 se ne uporablja za prilive na zamrznjene račune:
payments due under contracts, agreements or obligations that were concluded or arose before the date on which those accounts became subject to restrictive measures,
zapadlih plačil iz pogodb, dogovorov ali obveznosti, ki so bili sklenjeni ali so nastali pred datumom, ko so ti računi postali predmet omejevalnih ukrepov,
The Council, acting upon a proposal by a Member State or the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, shall adopt amendments to the list contained in the Annex as required.
Svet, na podlagi predloga države članice ali visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, po potrebi sprejme spremembe seznama v Prilogi.
The Council shall communicate its decision, including the grounds for listing, to the person concerned, either directly, if the address is known, or through the publication of a notice, providing such person with an opportunity to present observations.
Svet o svojem sklepu, vključno z razlogi za vključitev na seznam, obvesti zadevno osebo bodisi neposredno, če je naslov znan, bodisi z objavo uradnega obvestila, s tem pa navedeni osebi da možnost, da predloži pripombe.
Where observations are submitted, or where substantial new evidence is presented, the Council shall review its decision and inform the person concerned accordingly.
Če so predložene pripombe ali novi tehtni dokazi, Svet pregleda svoj sklep in o tem ustrezno obvesti zadevno osebo.
In order to maximise the impact of the abovementioned measures, the Union shall encourage third States to adopt restrictive measures similar to those contained in this Decision.
Da bi bili navedeni ukrepi čim bolj učinkoviti, Unija spodbuja tretje države, da sprejmejo podobne omejevalne ukrepe, kakor jih vsebuje ta sklep.
Council Common Position 2004/694/CFSP is hereby repealed.
Skupno stališče Sveta 2004/694/SZVP se razveljavi.
References to it shall be read as references to this Decision.
Sklicevanja nanj se razumejo kot sklicevanja na ta sklep.
Done at Luxembourg, 7 October 2010.
V Luxembourgu, 7. oktobra 2010
OJ L 253, 25.9.2009, p. 17.
UL L 253, 25.9.2009, str. 17.
Case No: IT 04 75
Zadeva št.: IT 04 75
Initial indictment: 25 July 1995; second indictment: 16 November 1995; amended indictment: 8 November 2002
Prvotna obtožnica: 25. julija 1995; druga obtožnica: 16. novembra 1995; spremenjena obtožnica: 8 novembra 2002
This Decision shall apply until 10 October 2011.
Ta sklep se uporablja do 10. oktobra 2011.
on the reallocation to Portugal of additional days at sea within ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa excluding the Gulf of Cadiz
o prerazporeditvi dodatnih dni na morju Portugalski v razdelkih ICES VIIIc in IXa z izjemo Cadiškega zaliva
(notified under document C(2010) 6735)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 6735)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 53/2010 of 14 January 2010 fixing for 2010 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in EU waters and, for EU vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required and amending Regulations (EC) No 1359/2008, (EC) No 754/2009, (EC) No 1226/2009 and (EC) No 1287/2009 [1], and in particular point 7.5 of Annex IIB thereto,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 53/2010 z dne 14. januarja 2010 o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za leto 2010 za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki se uporabljajo v vodah EU, in za plovila EU v vodah, kjer so potrebne omejitve ulova ter o spremembah Uredb (ES) št. 1359/2008, (ES) št. 754/2009, (ES) št. 1226/2009 in (ES) št. 1287/2009 [1] ter zlasti točke 7.5 Priloge IIB k Uredbi,
Point 5.1 of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) No 53/2010 specifies the maximum number of days on which EU vessels of an overall length equal to or greater than 10 meters carrying on board trawls, Danish seines and similar gears of mesh size equal to or larger than 32 mm and gill-nets of mesh size equal to or larger than 60 mm and bottom long-lines may be present within ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa, excluding the Gulf of Cadiz, from 1 February 2010 to 31 January 2011.
Točka 5.1 Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) št. 53/2010 določa največje število dni, ko so ribiška plovila EU, skupne dolžine 10 m ali več, ki imajo na krovu vlečne mreže, danske potegalke in podobno orodje z velikostjo mrežnega očesa 32 mm ali več, zabodne mreže z velikostjo mrežnega očesa 60 mm ali več ter pridnene parangale, lahko prisotna v razdelkih ICES VIIIc in IXa z izjemo Cadiškega zaliva od 1. februarja 2010 do 31. januarja 2011.
Point 7.5 of Annex IIB enables the Commission to take a decision that reassesses additional number of days resulting from a permanent cessation of fishing activity previously allocated by the Commission.
V skladu s točko 7.5 Priloge IIB lahko Komisija sprejme odločitev, s katero ponovno oceni dodatno število dni, ki izhaja iz dokončne prekinitve aktivnosti in ga je Komisija prehodno dodelila.
The reassessment of additional fishing days previously allocated by the Commission should take account of the calculation method provided for in the second paragraph of point 7.1 of Annex IIB and be computed on the basis of the current gear groupings and limitations on days at sea.
Pri ponovni oceni dodatnih ribolovnih dni, ki jih je predhodno dodelila Komisija, je treba upoštevati metodo izračuna iz drugega odstavka točke 7.1 Priloge IIB, izračunajo pa se na podlagi skupin orodja in veljavnih omejitev dni na morju.
On 8 and 23 February, 25 March and 22 April 2010 Portugal submitted data and requested the Commission to reassess the number of days previously allocated by the Commission.
Portugalska je 8. februarja, 23. februarja, 25. marca in 22. aprila 2010 predložila podatke in Komisijo zaprosila, da ponovno oceni število dni, ki jih je predhodno dodelila.
Having regard to Commission Decision 2007/474/EC of 4 July 2007 on the allocation to Portugal of additional days at sea within ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa excluding the Gulf of Cadiz [2], and on the basis of the current gear groupings and limitations on days at sea, fourteen additional days at sea for vessels carrying on board the fishing gears specified in point 2 a) of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) No 53/2010 should be allocated to Portugal for the period from 1 February 2010 to 31 January 2011.
Ob upoštevanju Odločbe Komisije 2007/474/ES z dne 4. julija 2007 o dodelitvi dodatnih dni na morju Portugalski v razdelkih ICES VIIIc in IXa z izjemo Cadiškega zaliva [2] in na podlagi skupin orodja in veljavnih omejitev dni na morju se Portugalski za obdobje od 1. februarja 2010 do 31. januarja 2011 dodeli štirinajst dodatnih dni na morju za plovila, ki imajo na krovu ribolovno orodje iz točke 2(a) Priloge k IIB Uredbi (EU) št. 53/2010.
Having regard to Commission Decision 2010/415/EU of 26 July 2010 on the allocation to Portugal of additional days at sea within ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa excluding the Gulf of Cadiz [3], and on the basis of the current gear groupings and limitations on days at sea, nineteen additional days at sea for vessels carrying on board the fishing gears specified in point 2 a) of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) No 53/2010 should be allocated to Portugal for the period from 1 February 2010 to 31 January 2011,
Ob upoštevanju Sklepa Komisije 2010/415/EU z dne 26. julija 2010 o dodelitvi dodatnih dni na morju Portugalski v razdelkih ICES VIIIc in IXa z izjemo Cadiškega zaliva [3] in na podlagi skupin orodja in veljavnih omejitev dni na morju se Portugalski za obdobje od 1. februarja 2010 do 31. januarja 2011 dodeli devetnajst dodatnih dni na morju za plovila, ki imajo na krovu ribolovno orodje iz točke 2(a) Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) št. 53/2010 –
The maximum number of days on which a fishing vessel flying the flag of Portugal and carrying on board the fishing gear grouping mentioned in point 2 a) of Annex IIB to Regulation (EU) No 53/2010 and not subject to any of the special conditions listed in point 5.2 of that Annex may be present within ICES Divisions VIIIc and IXa excluding the Gulf of Cadiz, as laid down in Table I of that Annex, shall be amended to 191 days per year.
Največje število dni, ko sme biti ribiško plovilo, ki pluje pod zastavo Portugalske in ima na krovu skupino ribolovnega orodja iz točke 2(a) Priloge IIB k Uredbi (EU) št. 53/2010 ter za katero ne velja noben poseben pogoj iz točke 5.2 navedene priloge, prisotno v razdelkih ICES VIIIc in IXa z izjemo Cadiškega zaliva, kakor je določeno v razpredelnici I navedene priloge, se popravi na 191 dni na leto.
OJ L 179, 7.7.2007, p. 53.
UL L 179, 7.7.2007, str. 53.
OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 76.
UL L 195, 27.7.2010, str. 76.
of 26 January 2010
z dne 26. januarja 2010
on State aid C 56/07 (ex E 15/05) granted by France to La Poste
o državni pomoči C 56/07 (ex E 15/05) Francije za La Poste
(notified under document C(2010) 133)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 133)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) Pogodbe,
On 21 December 2005 the Commission approved the transfer of the banking and financial business of the French Post Office (La Poste) to its subsidiary La Banque Postale.
Komisija je 21. decembra 2005 odobrila prenos bančnih in finančnih dejavnosti podjetja La Poste na njegovo hčerinsko podjetje La Banque Postale.
In its Decision the Commission stated that the question of the unlimited state guarantee in favour of La Poste would be the subject of a separate proceeding.
Komisija je v odločitvi poudarila, da bo vprašanje neomejenega državnega poroštva za podjetje La Poste predmet posebnega postopka.
On 21 February 2006, in accordance with Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘the Procedural Regulation’), the Commission informed the French authorities of its preliminary finding as to the existence of an unlimited state guarantee which resulted from the legal form of La Poste and which constituted State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU, and it invited them to submit their comments.
Komisija je 21. februarja 2006 v skladu s členom 17 Uredbe Sveta št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: postopkovna uredba) francoske organe obvestila o svojih predhodnih ugotovitvah glede obstoja neomejenega državnega poroštva, ki naj bi izhajalo iz statusa podjetja La Poste in pomenilo državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU, ter jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
Inasmuch as this presumed unlimited state guarantee was in force before 1 January 1958, the Commission applied the rules of procedure concerning existing aid in accordance with Article 1(b) of the Procedural Regulation.
Ker je to domnevno neomejeno državno poroštvo veljalo že pred 1. januarjem 1958, je Komisija v skladu s členom 1(b) zgoraj navedene postopkovne uredbe uporabila postopkovna pravila za veljavne pomoči.
The Commission received the French authorities’ reply on 24 April 2006.
Komisija je odgovor francoskih organov prejela 24. aprila 2006.
On 4 October 2006, in accordance with Article 18 of the Procedural Regulation, the Commission called on France to withdraw, by 31 December 2008, the guarantee given, on all its liabilities, to La Poste by virtue of its legal form.
Komisija je 4. oktobra 2006 v skladu s členom 18 postopkovne uredbe Francijo pozvala, naj najpozneje do 31. decembra 2008 ukine poroštvo, ki ga ima podjetje La Poste na podlagi svojega statusa pri izpolnjevanju vseh svojih obveznosti.
On 6 December 2006 the Commission received a memorandum from the French authorities challenging the findings presented by the Commission in its letter of 4 October 2006.
Komisija je 6. decembra 2006 prejela obvestilo francoskih organov, s katerim so izpodbijali ugotovitve Komisije iz dopisa z dne 4. oktobra 2006.
Following a meeting with the Commission department in charge of competition questions (‘DG Competition’), by letter dated 16 January 2007 the French authorities submitted to the Commission a draft amendment to the Decree implementing Law No 80-539 of 16 July 1980 on the penalties imposed in administrative matters and on the execution of judgments by legal entities governed by public law (‘the Law of 16 July 1980’), namely Decree No 81-501 of 12 May 1981 adopted for the implementation of the Law of 16 July 1980 on the penalties imposed in administrative matters and on the execution of judgments by legal entities governed by public law (‘the Decree of 12 May 1981’).
Francoski organi so po sestanku s službami Komisije, pristojnimi za konkurenco (v nadaljnjem besedilu: GD za konkurenco), z dopisom z dne 16. januarja 2007 Komisiji predložili osnutek spremembe odloka o izvajanju zakona št. 80-539 z dne 16. julija 1980 o denarnih kaznih, izrečenih na upravnem področju, in izvrševanju sodb s strani pravnih oseb javnega prava (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon z dne 16. julija 1980), to je odloka št. 81-501 z dne 12. maja 1981, sprejetega za izvajanje zakona z dne 16. julija 1980 o denarnih kaznih, izrečenih na upravnem področju, in izvrševanju sodb s strani pravnih oseb javnega prava (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odlok z dne 12. maja 1981).
Following a request from the Commission for clarification, the French authorities sent a memorandum, which was received on 1 February 2007, explaining the situation of creditors of La Poste should the latter find itself in financial difficulties.
Francoski organi so na zahtevo Komisije po pojasnilih poslali obvestilo, ki ga je Komisija prejela 1. februarja 2007 in v katerem so pojasnili položaj upnikov podjetja La Poste, če bi se to znašlo v finančnih težavah.
By memorandum dated 19 March 2007 the French authorities made an additional proposal consisting in undertaking, together with La Poste, to mention in any financing agreement or issuing prospectus of La Poste the fact that no guarantee was being provided.
Francoski organi so z obvestilom z dne 19. marca 2007 navedli dodatni predlog, in sicer da naj bi se skupaj s podjetjem La Poste zavezali, da bodo v vseh pogodbah o financiranju in prospektih podjetja La Poste navedli neobstoj poroštva.
By letter dated 29 November 2007 the Commission informed France of its decision to open the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU in respect of the measure (‘the opening decision’).
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 29. novembra 2007 Francijo obvestila o svoji odločitvi, da bo zoper ta ukrep sprožila postopek iz člena 108(2) PDEU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odločitev o sprožitvi postopka).
The opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločitev o sprožitvi postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe k zadevnem ukrepu.
The Commission received no comments from interested parties.
Komisija od zainteresiranih strani ni prejela pripomb v zvezi s tem.
By letter dated 23 January 2008 the Commission received comments from France.
Komisija je pripombe Francije prejela z dopisom z dne 23. februarja 2008.
The Commission published on DG Competition’s website an invitation to tender for carrying out a study into the unlimited guarantee given by the French Republic to La Poste.
Komisija je na spletni strani GD za konkurenco objavila javni razpis za izvedbo študije o neomejenem poroštvu Francoske republike za podjetje La Poste.
Four bids were received before the deadline of 21 April 2008.
Pred iztekom roka 21. aprila 2008 so prispele štiri ponudbe.
The study was entrusted to Ms Sophie Nicinski, professeur des universités, agrégée de droit public, Doctor of Laws and author of publications on the subject of state guarantees for publicly owned establishments of an industrial and commercial character.
Za izvedbo študije je bila izbrana Sophie NICINSKI, univerzitetna profesorica za javno pravo, doktorica prava ter avtorica publikacij na temo državnega poroštva za industrijske in komercialne osebe javnega prava.
The expert (‘the Commission’s expert’) submitted her report on 17 November 2008.
Izvedenka (v nadaljevanju: izvedenka Komisije) je poročilo predložila 17. novembra 2008.
Following the appearance in the French press of information about the adoption by the French Government of a draft law approving the change of La Poste’s legal form, on 20 July 2009 the Commission asked France whether it would agree to undertake to convert La Poste into a public limited company subject to the compulsory administration and winding-up procedures provided for under ordinary law.
Ko so se v tisku pojavile informacije, da je francoska vlada sprejela osnutek zakona za potrditev spremembe statusa podjetja La Poste, je Komisija 20. julija 2009 Francijo vprašala, ali bi privolila v prevzem obveznosti v zvezi s preoblikovanjem podjetja La Poste v delniško družbo, za katero veljajo občepravni postopki sanacije in sodne likvidacije.
Under cover of its letter, the Commission forwarded its expert’s report to the French authorities.
Komisija je v istem dopisu francoskim organom poslala poročilo svoje izvedenke.
After two reminder letters from the Commission dated 9 September and 6 October 2009, France made known, by memorandum transmitted on 27 October 2009, its comments on the Commission’s expert’s report and forwarded an opinion by Mr Guy Carcassonne, professeur des universités and agrégé des facultés de droit (‘the French authorities’ expert’).
Francija je po dveh pisnih opominih Komisije z dne 9. septembra in 6. oktobra 2009 z obvestilom z dne 27. oktobra 2009 sporočila pripombe k poročilu izvedenke Komisije in predložila mnenje univerzitetnega profesorja prava Guya CARCASSONNA (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izvedenec francoskih organov).
An amendment to the draft law on La Poste and postal activities was tabled on 11 December 2009, postponing La Poste’s conversion into a public limited company until March 2010.
Sprememba osnutka zakona o podjetju La Poste in poštnih dejavnostih je bila vložena 11. decembra 2009, z njo pa je bilo preoblikovanje podjetja La Poste v delniško družbo preloženo na marec 2010.
Law No 90-568 of 2 July 1990 on the organisation of public postal and telecommunication services (‘the Law of 2 July 1990’) converted the former Directorate-General for Posts and Telecommunications into two legal entities governed by public law: La Poste and France Telecom.
Nekdanja generalna direkcija za pošto in telekomunikacije je bila z zakonom št. 90-568 z dne 2. julija 1990 o organizaciji javne službe poštnih storitev in o družbi France Télécom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon z dne 2. julija 1990) preoblikovana v dve pravni osebi javnega prava: La Poste in France Télécom.
Some legal entities governed by public law are not, legally speaking, publicly owned establishments of an administrative character (établissements publics à caractère administratif — EPAs) or publicly owned establishments of an industrial and commercial character (établissements publics à caractère industriel et commercial — EPICs).
Nekatere pravne osebe javnega prava z zakonom niso bile opredeljene kot osebe javnega prava upravne narave (EPA) ali osebe javnega prava industrijske in komercialne narave (EPIC).
Such is the case with La Poste.
Tak je primer podjetja La Poste.
In its judgment of 18 January 2001 (2nd Civil Division), the Court of Cassation nevertheless held that La Poste is to be deemed equivalent to an EPIC.
Vendar pa je kasacijsko sodišče (drugi civilni senat) v sodbi z dne 18. januarja 2001 uporabilo načelo, v skladu katerim se podjetje La Poste šteje za enakovredno osebi javnega prava industrijske in komercialne narave (EPIC).
The legal consequences of La Poste’s legal form are as follows:
Pravne posledice statusa podjetja La Poste so naslednje:
INAPPLICABILITY OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURES TO LA POSTE
ZA PODJETJE LA POSTE SE NE UPORABLJAJO POSTOPKI PLAČILNE NESPOSOBNOSTI IN STEČAJA
Article 1 of the Law of 2 July 1990 states that La Poste is a legal entity governed by public law.
S členom 1 zakona z 2. julija 1990 je bilo podjetje La Poste opredeljeno kot pravna oseba javnega prava.
Now, in France, legal entities governed by public law are not subject to ordinary law as regards the compulsory administration and winding up of firms in difficulty.
V Franciji pa za pravne osebe javnega prava ne velja obče pravo s področja sanacije in sodne likvidacije podjetij v težavah.
The inapplicability of insolvency and bankruptcy procedures to legal entities governed by public law apparently derives from the general principle of the immunity from seizure of the assets of legal entities governed by public law, which has been recognised by the French courts, including the Court of Cassation, since the late 19th century.
Neuporaba postopkov plačilne nesposobnosti in stečaja za pravne osebe javnega prava naj bi izhajala iz splošnega načela, ki ga francoska sodna praksa ter zlasti kasacijsko sodišče priznavata od konca 19. stoletja, in sicer da pravnim osebam javnega prava premoženja ni mogoče zaseči.
APPLICABILITY TO LA POSTE OF THE LAW OF 16 JULY 1980 AND OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LAST-RESORT STATE LIABILITY FOR THE DEBTS OF LEGAL ENTITIES GOVERNED BY PUBLIC LAW
ZA PODJETJE LA POSTE SE UPORABLJATA ZAKON Z DNE 16. JULIJA 1980 IN NAČELO ODGOVORNOSTI DRŽAVE ZA DOLGOVE PRAVNIH OSEB JAVNEGA PRAVA KOT ZADNJEGA SREDSTVA