natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If necessary, the TCO is to deliver security certificates for the International Rail Ticket for Home Printing (IRTHP) to the distributors
Po potrebi mora TCO izročiti distributerjem varnostna potrdila za Mednarodno železniško vozovnico za tiskanje doma (IRTHP)
Means the storage of data similar to a database and data dictionary; however, it usually encompasses a comprehensive information management system environment. It must include not only descriptions of data structures (i.e. entities and elements), but also Metadata of interest to the enterprise, data screens, reports, programs, and systems
Pomeni skladiščenje podatkov, ki je podobno podatkovni bazi in podatkovnemu slovarju; vendar po navadi vključuje celovit sistem za upravljanje informacij Poleg opisov podatkovnih struktur (tj. osebkov in elementov) mora vsebovati tudi metapodatke, ki so zanimivi za podjetje, podatkovne zaslone, poročila, programe in sisteme
The European Railway Agency shall publish on its website the reference files referred to in Section 4.2.19 of Annex I and shall keep them up to date. It shall implement a change management process for such files.
2. Evropska agencija za železniški promet na svoji spletni strani objavi in posodablja referenčne datoteke, navedene v oddelku 4.2.19 Priloge I. Za te datoteke izvaja postopek upravljanja sprememb.
Means that the continuation of the train is unknown based on local circumstances at the time and in the opinion of the parties involved. If the Delay is known, the infrastructure manager sends a train running forecast message
Pomeni, da je na podlagi lokalnih razmer v določenem času in mnenja vključenih strani nadaljevanje vožnje vlaka neznano Če je znana zamuda, upravljavec infrastrukture pošlje sporočilo o napovedi vožnje vlaka
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 455/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 455/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 May 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 12. maja 2011.
Done at Brussels, 11 May 2011.
V Bruslju, 11. maja 2011
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 456/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 456/2011
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 438/2011 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 438/2011 [4].
OJ L 118, 6.5.2011, p. 6.
UL L 118, 6.5.2011, str. 6.
Amended representative prices and additional import duties applicable to white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029095 from 12 May 2011
Spremenjene reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za beli in surovi sladkor ter proizvode z oznako KN 17029095, ki se uporabljajo od 12. maja 2011
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 457/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 457/2011
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of melamine originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz melamina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the European Commission (Commission) after having consulted the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) predložila po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
By Regulation (EU) No 1035/2010 [2] (the provisional Regulation) the Commission imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of melamine originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Z Uredbo (EU) št. 1035/2010 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasna uredba) je Komisija uvedla začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz melamina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LRK).
The provisional anti-dumping duties ranged from 44,9 % to 65,2 %.
Začasne protidampinške dajatve so znašale od 44,9 % do 65,2 %.
The proceedings were initiated as a result of a complaint lodged on 4 January 2010 by EU producers Borealis Agrolinz Melamine GmbH, DSM Melamine BV and Zakłady Azotowe Puławy (the complainant), representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Union production of melamine.
Postopki so se začeli na podlagi pritožbe, ki so jo 4. januarja 2010 vložili proizvajalci EU Borealis Agrolinz Melamine GmbH, DSM Melamine B.V. in Zakłady Azotowe Puławy (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik), ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje melamina v Uniji.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2006 to the end of the IP (period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do konca OP (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
The Commission sought and verifed all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Komisija je še naprej zbirala in preverjala vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za sprejetje dokončnih ugotovitev.
To this end a verification visit was carried out at the premises of the following user company in order to assess the possible impact of the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures:
Da bi se ocenile možne posledice uvedbe dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, je bil v ta namen v prostorih naslednje družbe uporabnice opravljen preveritveni obisk:
Coveright Surfaces Spain, Martorelles (Barcelona), Spain.
Coveright Surfaces Spain, Martorelles (Barcelona), Španija.
Subsequently all parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of melamine originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty (final disclosure).
Nato so bile vse strani obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih sta se nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz melamina s poreklom iz LRK in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure.
Vsem strankam je bilo določeno obdobje, v katerem so lahko izrazile pripombe o tem dokončnem razkritju.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the parties concerned by the proceeding, recitals 4 to 10 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede strani, ki jih postopek zadeva, se uvodne izjave 4 do 10 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It is recalled that in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation the product concerned is defined as melamine, currently falling within CN code 29336100 and originating in the PRC.
Opozoriti je treba, da je zadevni izdelek, v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe, opredeljen kot melamin, trenutno uvrščen v oznako KN 29336100 in s poreklom iz LRK.
It is used mainly in laminates, moulding powders, wood-based panels and coating resins.
Večinoma se uporablja pri laminatih, prahu za oblikovanje, lesnih ploščah in premaznih smolah.
One exporting producer reiterated the claim made in recital 65 of the provisional Regulation that the melamine produced and exported from the PRC was in general of a slightly lower quality compared to the melamine produced by the Union industry and could not be used for certain surface applications.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je ponovil trditev iz uvodne izjave 65 začasne uredbe, da je bil melamin, proizveden in izvožen iz LRK, na splošno rahlo slabše kakovosti v primerjavi s melaminom, ki ga proizvaja industrija Unije, in da ga ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za nekatere površinske premaze.
The argument of difference in quality was also brought forward by several users located in the Union.
Argument o razliki v kakovosti je izpostavilo tudi več uporabnikov iz EU.
The investigation has shown that although melamine may vary slightly in colour, it is not sold on the basis of different quality standards, either on the domestic market or on export markets.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se melamin, čeprav se lahko rahlo razlikuje v barvi, ne prodaja na podlagi različnih standardov kakovosti na domačem trgu ali izvoznih trgih.
No evidence was provided which would point to the fact that possible slight variations in melamine would lead to different basic physical and chemical characteristics and end uses.
Predloženih ni bilo nobenih dokazov, ki bi kazali, da bi se zaradi možnih rahlih razlik melamina razlikovale osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter končne uporabe.
The issue was not raised by the other exporting producers.
Drugi proizvajalci izvozniki niso izpostavili tega vprašanja.
Moreover, the investigation has also shown that the exporting producer in question was using a similar production process as the Union industry.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik uporabljal podoben proizvodni postopek kot industrija Unije.
Based on the above, the claim is rejected and it is hereby confirmed that melamine produced and sold by the Union industry in the Union, melamine produced and sold on the domestic market of the PRC and melamine imported into the Union from the PRC, as well as that produced and sold in Indonesia, which served as the analogue country, are considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi navedenega je trditev zavrnjena in se potrdi, da se štejejo melamin, ki ga industrija Unije proizvaja in prodaja v Uniji, melamin, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu v LRK, melamin, ki se uvaža v Unijo iz LRK, in melamin, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v Indoneziji, ki je bila uporabljena kot primerljiva država, za enake v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the like product, recitals 12 to 15 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 12 do 15 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Market economy treatment (MET) was initially refused to all exporting producers that requested it on the grounds that the costs of the major inputs did not substantially reflect market values as required under Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Tržnogospodarska obravnava (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TGO) se je na začetku zavrnila vsem proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so jo zahtevali na podlagi utemeljitve, da stroški za glavne vložke niso bistveno izražali tržnih vrednosti, kot zahteva člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
As set out in recitals 20 to 24 of the provisional Regulation, the MET investigation determined that this was due to State interference in both the natural gas market and the urea market in the PRC.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 20 do 24 začasne uredbe, je preiskava v zvezi s TGO pokazala, da je to posledica vmešavanja države v trg zemeljskega plina in trg za sečnino v LRK.
In addition to this general situation, there were also company-specific reasons for refusing MET as set out in recitals 25 to 28 of the provisional Regulation.
Poleg teh splošnih razmer so prav tako za zavrnitev TGO obstajali razlogi, specifični za družbo, kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 25 do 28 začasne uredbe.
One exporting producer argued that the urea price in the PRC was in line with the prices in other parts of the world, such as Indonesia and the Middle East, therefore the conclusion that the costs of major inputs were distorted was not correct.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je cena sečnine v LRK usklajena s cenami v drugih delih sveta, na primer v Indoneziji in na Bližnjem vzhodu, zato ugotovitev, da so bili stroški za glavne vložke izkrivljeni, ni bila pravilna.
However, the initial conclusion that the urea market in the PRC was subject to significant State interference, as set out in recitals 23 and 24 of the provisional Regulation, was not questioned.
Vendar se ni dvomilo v prvotno ugotovitev, da se v LRK država močno vmešava v trg za sečnino, kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 23 in 24 začasne uredbe.
This element is already sufficient to conclude that criterion 1 of point (c) of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation is not fulfilled.
To dejstvo že zadostuje za ugotovitev, da merilo 1 iz točke (c) člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe ni izpolnjeno.
This conclusion is not affected by the fact that at a certain point in time urea prices in the PRC and in some other parts of the world prices might have been roughly at the same level.
Na to ugotovitev ne vpliva dejstvo, da so bile mogoče v določenem obdobju cene sečnine v LRK in nekaterih drugih delih sveta na približno enaki ravni.
One exporting group disagreed with the refusal of MET and individual treatment (IT) based on the fact that the Commission did not receive full MET claim forms for all related companies.
Ena skupina izvoznikov se ni strinjala z zavrnitvijo TGO in individualne obravnave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IO) na podlagi dejstva, da Komisija ni prejela popolnih obrazcev zahtevkov za TGO za vse povezane družbe.
In its comments on the disclosure, this group offered full cooperation but did not question the fact that one of its related companies did not provide a MET claim form at the same time as the rest of the group.
Ta skupina je v pripombah na razkritje ponudila popolno sodelovanje, vendar ni dvomila v dejstvo, da ena izmed njenih povezanih družb ni predložila obrazca zahtevka za TGO istočasno kot preostali v skupini.
Therefore this claim is rejected.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne.
In the absence of any other comments concerning MET, recitals 16 to 32 are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z TGO ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 16 do 32.
It was provisionally established that three of the five exporting producer companies or groups in the PRC met all the requirements for IT.
Začasno je bilo določeno, da so tri od petih družb proizvajalk izvoznic ali skupin v LRK izpolnile vse zahteve za IO.
The Union industry questioned the decision to grant IT to three groups of companies by arguing that one exporting producer was owned by the Chinese State and another exporting producer had various links at management level to companies that were ultimately controlled by the State.
Industrija Unije je dvomila v odločitev o odobritvi IO za tri skupine družb z utemeljitvijo, da je en proizvajalec izvoznik v lasti države Kitajske, drug proizvajalec izvoznik pa je na ravni upravljanja na več načinov povezan z družbami, ki so pod popolnim nadzorom države.
In addition, the extent of State interference was such that it would allow circumvention of the measures with respect to all three exporting producers.
Poleg tega je bil obseg vmešavanja države takšen, da bi omogočil izogibanje ukrepom pri vseh treh proizvajalcih izvoznikih.
The investigation has shown that none of the exporting producers initially granted IT were State-owned.
Preiskava je pokazala, da noben proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu je bila IO prvotno odobrena, ni bil v lasti države.
In addition, the claim that the management of one exporting producer had links to State-controlled companies was not substantiated.
Poleg tega ni bila utemeljena trditev, da je bilo vodstvo enega proizvajalca izvoznika povezano z družbami pod državnim nadzorom.
With regard to the possible risk of circumvention, it should be noted that the investigation showed that export prices, quantities, conditions and terms of sale were freely negotiated and determined and that the exporting producers were neither State-owned nor otherwise subject to dominant State influence at management level.
V zvezi z možnim tveganjem izogibanja je treba omeniti, da je preiskava pokazala, da so bili izvozne cene, količine in prodajni pogoji prosto izpogajani in določeni ter da proizvajalci izvozniki niso bili v lasti države ali drugače pod prevladujočim vplivom države na ravni upravljanja.
Hence it may be concluded that State interference is not such as to permit circumvention of measures.
Iz tega torej sledi, da vmešavanje države ni bilo takšno, da bi dovoljevalo izogibanje ukrepom.
In view of the above, the claims of the Union industry are rejected.
Glede na navedeno se trditve industrije Unije zavrnejo.
The initial conclusion that three of the five exporting producers meet all requirements for IT is therefore confirmed.
Prvotna sklepna ugotovitev, da tri izmed petih proizvajalcev izvoznikov izpolnjujejo vse zahteve za IO, se zato potrdi.
Indonesia was chosen as the analogue country.
Indonezija je bila izbrana kot primerljiva država.
The data submitted in the cooperating Indonesian producer’s reply were verified in situ and found to be reliable and a suitable basis for the normal value.
Podatki iz odgovora sodelujočega indonezijskega proizvajalca so bili preverjeni in situ ter ugotovljeni za zanesljive, na katerih bi lahko temeljila normalna vrednost.
One exporting producer questioned the choice of Indonesia as analogue country on the grounds that interested parties had not had the opportunity to comment on this choice.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je dvomil v izbiro Indonezije kot primerljive države, ker zainteresirane strani niso imele možnosti predložitve mnenj o tej izbiri.
However, since May 2010 the file open for inspection had contained a note explaining why Indonesia had been chosen as analogue country.
Vendar je dokumentacija, na voljo za pregled, od maja 2010 vsebovala opombo z obrazložitvijo, zakaj je bila Indonezija izbrana kot primerljiva država.
Thus, as parties had had ample opportunity to comment on this choice, their procedural rights had been respected in full.
Postopkovne pravice strani so bile tako v celoti spoštovane, saj so imele dovolj možnosti za predložitev pripomb na to izbiro.
No further comments were received on the choice of the analogue country.
Glede izbire primerljive države ni bila prejeta nobena dodatna pripomba.
It is therefore confirmed that Indonesia is an appropriate and reasonable analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se potrdi, da je Indonezija ustrezna in smiselna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
It is recalled that normal value was constructed using the cost of manufacturing of the Indonesian producer plus a reasonable amount for SG & A and for profit on the domestic market.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana z uporabo stroškov izdelave indonezijskega proizvajalca ter razumnih zneskov za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA stroški“) in dobiček na domačem trgu.
One exporting producer questioned the level of the constructed normal value, in particular the SG & A and profit that were based on those of the Union industry.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je dvomil v raven konstruirane normalne vrednosti, zlasti PSA stroške in dobiček, ki so temeljili na tistih industrije Unije.
However, this method is in line with point (c) of Article 2(6) and considered appropriate.
Vendar je ta metoda v skladu s točko (c) člena 2(6) in velja za primerno.
No other data were available that could be used as a basis for SG & A and profit as there were no other exporters or producers subject to investigation in the analogue country and the producer subject to the investigation did not sell any other category of products in the IP.
Na voljo ni bilo drugih podatkov, ki bi jih bilo mogoče uporabiti kot osnovo za PSA stroške in dobiček, saj v primerljivi državi niso bili preiskani nobeni drugi izvozniki ali proizvajalci, proizvajalec, ki je bil predmet preiskave, pa v OP ni prodajal nobene druge kategorije izdelkov.
Recitals 35 to 45 with regard to the determination of the normal value are hereby confirmed.
Uvodne izjave 35 do 45 glede določitve normalne vrednosti se potrdijo.
Export prices for the exporting producers granted IT
Izvozne cene za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bila odobrena IO
In the absence of any comments with regard to the determination of the export price, recital 46 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z določitvijo izvozne cene ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdi uvodna izjava 46 začasne uredbe.
One exporting producer questioned the comparison of the normal value and the export price with regard to the issue of VAT.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je dvomil v primerjavo normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene v zvezi z vprašanjem DDV.
However, as normal value and export price were compared at the same level of indirect taxation, i.e. VAT included, in line with point (c) of Article 2(10), no change to this method is needed.
Vendar te metode ni treba spremeniti, saj sta bili normalna vrednost in izvozna cena primerjani na isti ravni posredne obdavčitve, tj. vključno z DDV, v skladu s točko (b) člena 2(10).
Therefore recitals 47 and 48 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se potrdita uvodni izjavi 47 in 48 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the dumping margins, recital 49 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s stopnjami dampinga ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdi uvodna izjava 49 začasne uredbe.
On that basis the definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Na podlagi tega so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
For all other exporting producers
Za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the dumping margins recitals 51 to 52 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s stopnjami dampinga ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 51 do 52 začasne uredbe.
On this basis the country-wide level of dumping is definitely established at 65,6 % of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, and recital 53 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Na tej podlagi je stopnja dampinga na ravni države dokončno določena na 65,6 % cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, uvodna izjava 53 začasne uredbe pa se potrdi.
In the absence of any comments concerning the Union production and the Union industry, recitals 54 to 56 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi s proizvodnjo Unije in industrijo Unije, se uvodne izjave 54 do 56 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Some parties claimed that Eurostat figures concerning imports of melamine from the PRC were not reliable in terms of quantity.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da podatki Eurostata glede uvoza melamina iz LRK niso bili zanesljivi z vidika količine.
A verification of Eurostat data led to minor changes in the import figures and consequently in the Union consumption as shown in the tables below.
Zaradi preverjanja podatkov Eurostata je prišlo do manjših sprememb podatkov glede uvoza in posledično glede potrošnje Unije, kot prikazujeta naslednji tabeli.
These changes are not such as to affect the analysis of the Union consumption in recitals 57 to 59 of the provisional Regulation which can thus be confirmed.
Te spremembe niso bile takšne, da bi vplivale na analizo potrošnje Unije iz uvodnih izjav 57 do 59 začasne uredbe, ki se jih tako lahko potrdi.
Source: Updated Eurostat data and questionnaire replies.
Vir: Posodobljeni podatki Eurostata in izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Imports into the European Union from the country concerned
Uvoz iz zadevne države v Evropsko unijo
Source: Updated Eurostat data.
Vir: Posodobljeni podatki Eurostata.