natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the Notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predložijo svoja stališča v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers, Union producers and unrelated importers, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov, proizvajalcev Unije in nepovezanih uvoznikov je bilo v obvestilu o začetku postopka predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe.
As explained in recital (51) below, two Chinese exporting producer groups provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (51), sta dve skupini kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
As explained in recital (53) below, it was decided that sampling was not necessary for Union producers.
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (53), je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje za proizvajalce Unije ni potrebno.
As explained in recital (54) below, it was decided that sampling was not necessary for unrelated importers.
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (54), je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje za nepovezane uvoznike ni potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all other parties that so requested within the deadlines set out in the Notice of initiation, namely the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers in the PRC and an association of producers, the representatives of the country concerned, known importers and known users.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem stranem, za katere je bilo znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim stranem, ki so to zahtevale v rokih, določenih v obvestilu o začetku postopka, in sicer pritožniku, drugim znanim proizvajalcem Unije, znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK in združenju proizvajalcev, predstavnikom zadevne države, znanim uvoznikom in znanim uporabnikom.
Replies to the questionnaires and other submissions were received from two groups of Chinese exporting producers, CEPIFINE, the four complainant Union producers and one additional Union producer, 13 unrelated importers and traders, 5 users and one association of the printing industry.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike in druga stališča je prejela od dveh skupin kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, združenja pritožnika „CEPIFINE“, štirih proizvajalcev Unije pritožnikov in enega dodatnega proizvajalca Unije, 13 nepovezanih uvoznikov in trgovcev, 5 uporabnikov in enega združenja iz tiskarske industrije.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following State authority and companies:
Preveritveni obiski so potekali v prostorih naslednjega državnega organa in podjetij:
Government of the People Republic of China
vlada Ljudske republike Kitajske:
Chinese Ministry of Commerce, Beijing, China
kitajsko ministrstvo za gospodarstvo, Peking, Kitajska;
CEPIFINE, Brussels, Belgium
CEPIFINE, Bruselj, Belgija,
Sappi Fine Paper Europe, Brussels, Belgium
Sappi Fine Paper Europe, Bruselj, Belgija,
LECTA Group (CARTIERE DEL GARDA SpA, Riva del Garda, Italy CONDAT SAS, Le Plessis Robinson, France and TORRASPAPEL, S.A., Barcelona, Spain), Barcelona, Spain
LECTA Group (CARTIERE DEL GARDA SpA, Riva del Garda, Italija, CONDAT SAS, Le Plessis Robinson, Francija in TORRASPAPEL, S.A., Barcelona, Španija), Barcelona, Španija,
Burgo Group spa, Altavilla Vicentina, Italy and its related companies Burgo Distribuzione srl, Milan, Italy and Ebix sa, Barcelona, Spain
Burgo Group spa, Altavilla Vicentina, Italija in njene povezane družbe Burgo Distribuzione srl, Milan, Italija in Ebix sa, Barcelona, Španija,
Papierfabriek Scheufelen GmbH, Lenningen, Germany
Papierfabriek Scheufelen GmbH, Lenningen, Nemčija;
Sinar Mas Paper (China) Investment Co Ltd, the holding company of the Asia Pulp & Paper Group (‘APP’)
Sinar Mas Paper (Kitajska) Investment Co Ltd, krovna družba skupine Asia Pulp & Paper Group („APP“):
Ningbo Zhonghua Paper Co., Ltd, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, PRC
Ningbo Zhonghua Paper Co., Ltd, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, LRK,
Ningbo Asia Pulp & Paper Co., Ltd, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province PRC
Ningbo Asia Pulp & Paper Co., Ltd, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, LRK;
Chenming Paper Group (‘Chenming’)
Chenming Paper Group („Chenming“):
Cartaria Subalpina, Turin, Italy
Cartaria Subalpina, Torino, Italija,
Paperlinx, Northampton, UK
Paperlinx, Northampton, Združeno kraljestvo.
INVESTIGATION PERIOD AND PERIOD CONSIDERED
OBDOBJE PREISKAVE IN OBRAVNAVANO OBDOBJE
The investigation of subsidisation and injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 (the ‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava subvencioniranja in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2006 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is coated fine paper which is paper or paperboard coated on one or both sides (excluding kraft paper or kraft paperboard), in either sheets or rolls, and with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 and brightness of more than 84 (measured according to ISO 2470-1), originating in the PRC (‘the product concerned’ or ‘CFP’) currently falling within CN codes ex48101320, ex48101380, ex48101420, ex48101480, ex48101910, ex48101990, ex48102210, ex48102290, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910, ex48109930 and ex48109990.
Zadevni izdelek je premazan fini papir, tj. na eni ali obeh straneh premazan papir ali karton (razen kraft papirja ali kraft kartona) v listih ali zvitkih, mase med 70 g/m2 in 400 g/m2 in beline nad 84 (merjeno v skladu z ISO 2470-1), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“ ali „PFP“), ki se trenutno uvršča v oznake KN ex48101320, ex48101380, ex48101420, ex48101480, ex48101910, ex48101990, ex48102210, ex48102290, ex48102930, ex48102980, ex48109910, ex48109930 in ex48109990.
CFP is high quality paper and paperboard generally used for the printing of reading material such as magazines, catalogues, annual reports, yearbooks.
PFP je visokokakovostni papir in karton, ki se navadno uporablja za tiskanje gradiva za branje, kot so revije, katalogi, letna poročila, zborniki.
The product concerned includes both sheets and rolls suitable for use in sheet-fed (‘cut star’) printing machines.
Zadevni izdelek vključuje liste in zvitke, primerne za uporabo v tiskarskih strojih za formatni tisk („rezalna zvezda“).
Rolls suitable for use in sheet-fed presses (‘cutter rolls’) are designed to be cut into pieces before printing, and are thus considered to be substitutable and directly competitive with sheets.
Zvitki, primerni za uporabo v tiskalnih strojih za formatni tisk („zvitki za rezalnike“), so oblikovani tako, da se pred tiskanjem razrežejo ter se tako štejejo za zamenljive in neposredno konkurenčne listom.
However, contrary to the above claim, the investigation confirmed that there are indeed distinct technical and physical characteristics such as humidity and stiffness between paper used in web-fed and the one used in sheet-fed printing.
Vendar je v nasprotju z navedeno trditvijo preiskava potrdila, da v resnici obstajajo razlike v tehničnih in fizikalnih lastnostih, kot sta vlažnost in trdota, med papirjem, ki se uporablja pri rotacijskem tiskanju, in tistim, ki se uporablja za formatno tiskanje.
The investigation further confirmed that the technical characteristics listed in recital (18) above are unique to rolls suitable for use in web-fed presses.
Preiskava je nadalje potrdila, da so tehnične lastnosti iz uvodne izjave (18) lastne zvitkom, primernim za uporabo v rotacijskih tiskalnih strojih.
However, the investigation revealed that the two types of rolls are also non-interchangeable from an economic point of view because rolls for web-fed printing are used for mass-volume printing jobs and are generally made to order and require just-in-time delivery, therefore these products are not stocked by intermediaries but are shipped directly to the final users, i.e. they are also sold through a different distribution channel than rolls used in sheet-fed printing.
Vendar je preiskava razkrila, da obe vrsti zvitkov tudi z gospodarskega vidika nista zamenljivi, ker se zvitki za rotacijsko tiskanje uporabljajo za obsežna tiskarska dela in so navadno izdelani po naročilu ter zahtevajo sprotno dostavo, zato teh izdelkov ne skladiščijo posredniki, temveč se dostavljajo neposredno končnim uporabnikom, kar pomeni, da se tudi prodajajo po drugačnih distribucijskih kanalih kakor zvitki, ki se uporabljajo pri formatnem tiskanju.
Furthermore, no rolls for use in web-fed presses were imported from the PRC during the period considered.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju niso bili uvoženi nobeni zvitki za uporabo v rotacijskih tiskalnih strojih.
It may also be considered unlikely that these products would be imported in the future as sourcing these products from far away is economically not viable for the reasons mentioned in the previous recital.
Malo verjetno je tudi, da bi se ti izdelki uvažali v prihodnosti, saj nabavljanje teh izdelkov iz oddaljenih držav ni ekonomsko upravičeno zaradi razlogov, navedenih v prejšnji uvodni izjavi.
The party further claimed that on the basis of some other tests conducted in its own laboratory measuring the resistance to picking of web rolls produced by the Union producers, it can be seen that these products would not fall into the current product definition which would show that the criterion of ‘resistance to picking’ for distinguishing CFP used in web-fed and sheet-fed printing is unsuitable.
Stran je nadalje trdila, da je mogoče na podlagi nekaterih drugih preskusov, ki jih je izvedla v lastnem laboratoriju in s katerimi je merila odpornost proti trganju zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje, ki so jih proizvedli proizvajalci Unije, videti, da ti izdelki ne spadajo v sedanjo opredelitev izdelka, kar kaže, da je merilo „odpornosti proti trganju“ za razlikovanje med PFP, ki se uporablja za rotacijsko tiskanje in za formatno tiskanje, neustrezno.
With this evidence the party alleged that the exclusion of web rolls was made on an arbitrary basis.
S tem dokazom je stran trdila, da je bila izključitev zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje samovoljna.
No evidence was submitted with regard to the claim that the moisture content of the paper may render test results for ISO test standard ISO 3783:2006 unreliable.
Za trditev, da lahko z vsebnostjo vlage v papirju dobimo nezanesljive preskusne rezultate za preskusni standard ISO 3783:2006, ni predložila nobenega dokaza.
The test results presented by the exporting producer consisted of a summary of the test results performed in its own laboratory.
Rezultati, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec izvoznik, so obsegali povzetek preskusov, ki jih je izvedel v lastnem laboratoriju.
Crucially, the results were not made available for inspection and comments by other interested parties, in particular the Union industry, nor did the exporting producer submit a meaningful non-confidential summary thereof despite repeated reminders.
Najpomembneje pa je, da rezultati niso bili na voljo za pregled in pripombe s strani drugih zainteresiranih strani, zlasti industrije Unije, proizvajalec izvoznik pa kljub večkratnim opominom ni predložil smiselnega povzetka rezultatov, ki ni zaupne narave.
After disclosure, no further detailed information was provided by the exporting producer which could help assess the reliability of the test.
Po razkritju proizvajalec izvoznik ni predložil nobenih nadaljnjih podrobnih informacij, ki bi pomagale pri oceni zanesljivosti preskusa.
Since no non-confidential version of this test was provided, the companies whose web rolls were allegedly tested could not respond to the conclusions of the test.
Ker različica preskusa, ki ni zaupne narave, ni bila predložena, se podjetja, katerih zvitki za rotacijsko tiskanje so bili domnevno preskušani, niso mogla odzvati na sklepne ugotovitve preskusa.
The Commission thus could not objectively check whether the test results submitted were reliable and correct and could be relied upon for the purposes of the investigation.
Komisija zato ni mogla objektivno preveriti, ali so predloženi rezultati preskusa zanesljivi ter pravilni in ali se je za namene preiskave nanje mogoče zanašati.
On the basis of the facts available to the Commission, the objectivity and reliability of the test was found to be insufficient since the information submitted under confidentiality could not be counterchecked by any reliable sources.
Na podlagi dejstev, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo, je bilo ugotovljeno, da objektivnost in zanesljivost preskusa nista zadostni, saj informacij, ki so bile predložene kot zaupne, ni bilo mogoče navzkrižno preveriti s kakšnimi zanesljivimi viri.
After the disclosure of the findings, the same exporting producer presented the results of a further test conducted on its behalf by an external test laboratory and reiterated that CFP used in web-fed printing has been arbitrarily excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Po razkritju ugotovitev je isti proizvajalec izvoznik predložil rezultate nadaljnjega preskusa, ki ga je v njegovem imenu izvedel zunanji preskuševalni laboratorij, in ponovil, da je bil PFP, ki se uporablja pri rotacijskem slikanju, samovoljno izključen iz obsega preiskave.
The test reports stated that the resistance to picking has been measured on 25 samples of web-fed rolls provided and identified by the exporting producer to the laboratory as paper samples produced by Union producers.
Poročila o preskušanju so navajala, da je bila odpornost proti trganju merjena na 25 vzorcih zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje, ki jih je laboratoriju zagotovil proizvajalec izvoznik in jih opredelil kot vzorce papirja, ki ga proizvajajo proizvajalci Unije.
According to this report, none of the paper met both the criteria referred to in recital (18) above.
V skladu s tem poročilom ni noben od teh vzorcev izpolnil obeh meril iz uvodne izjave (18).
The assessment of the test report brought to light that, first of all, the test report by the external laboratory related mostly to products for which these results were irrelevant as the vast majority of the samples tested were not in fact web rolls; secondly, the test report related to products which were not sufficiently identified, as it could not be ascertained from the test report whether the paper tested was for sheet-fed printing or web-fed printing as the paper brand described in the report existed in both formats.
Prvič, ocena poročila o preskušanju je razkrila, da se je poročilo o preskušanju zunanjega laboratorija navezovalo večinoma na izdelke, za katere ti rezultati niso bili pomembni, saj večina preskušanih vzorcev dejansko niso bili zvitki za rotacijsko tiskanje; drugič, poročilo o preskušanju se je navezovalo na izdelke, ki niso bili zadostno opredeljeni, saj iz poročila o preskušanju ni bilo razvidno, ali je bil preskušani papir za formatno tiskanje ali rotacijsko tiskanje, saj znamka papirja, opisana v poročilu, obstaja v obeh formatih.
Furthermore the test report provided no assurance that the sample rolls indicated were indeed the ones that were tested.
Poleg tega poročilo o preskušanju ni omogočilo nobenega zagotovila, da so bili navedeni vzorčeni zvitki dejansko tisti, ki so bili preskušani.
In response to the external laboratory's test report, the complainant provided the results of the testing performed by one of the Union producers on the same samples of web rolls that were allegedly tested by the external laboratory.
V odgovor na poročilo zunanjega laboratorija o preskušanju je pritožnik predložil rezultate preskušanja, ki ga je en izmed proizvajalcev Unije izvedel na enakih vzorcih zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje, kot jih je domnevno preskušal zunanji laboratorij.
This test showed different results.
Ta preskus je pokazal drugačne rezultate.
The complainant attributed the differences to possibly different test conditions and thus a potential non-compliance with the ISO 3783:2006 standard, i.e. the standard according to which resistance to picking set in recital (16) of the provisional Regulation should be measured.
Pritožnik je razlike pripisal morebitnim drugačnim pogojem preskusa in tako morebitnemu neskladju s standardom ISO 3783:2006, tj. standardom, v skladu s katerim je treba meriti odpornost proti trganju iz uvodne izjave (16) začasne uredbe.
After disclosing the definitive findings, the exporting producer questioned the Commission's objectivity in rejecting the test result of the external laboratory.
Po razkritju dokončnih ugotovitev je proizvajalec izvoznik izrazil pomisleke, ali je bila Komisija objektivna, ko je zavrnila rezultate preskusa, ki ga je izvedel zunanji laboratorij.
It claimed that the testing was carried out blindly by the independent expert and in accordance with the relevant ISO standard.
Trdil je, da je bil preskus slep in da ga je izvedel neodvisni strokovnjak v skladu z ustreznim standardom ISO.
It provided an affidavit of its manager explaining the sourcing process of the samples used in the testing in order to prove the independence, correctness and representativeness of the testing.
Da bi dokazal neodvisnost, pravilnost in reprezentativnost preskusa, je predložil pisno izjavo njegovega direktorja, v kateri je bil pojasnjen postopek dobave vzorcev, uporabljenih pri preskušanju.
Firstly, the objectivity of the external laboratory test report was never questioned by the Commission and in this regard it is irrelevant that the testing was carried out blindly.
Prvič, Komisija ni nikoli podvomila v objektivnost poročila o preskušanju, ki ga je izvedel zunanji laboratorij, in s tem v zvezi je nepomembno, da se je preskus izvedel slepo.
On the other hand, doubts were raised as to the assurances on the selection and origin of the samples tested and not on the test itself.
Po drugi strani so bili izraženi pomisleki glede izbire in porekla preskušanih vzorcev in ne glede samega preskusa.
The arguments of the exporting producer did not remove these doubts as these were not comprehensive and were unclear in several aspects, for example the inclusion of products other than web rolls were claimed to have been caused by administrative errors or were blamed on mistakes by the suppliers in providing possibly wrong samples.
Argumenti, ki jih je navedel proizvajalec izvoznik, teh pomislekov niso odpravili, saj so bili nepopolni in na številnih mestih nejasni; trdil je, na primer, da so vključitev izdelkov, ki niso zvitki za rotacijsko tiskanje, povzročile administrativne napake ali napake dobaviteljev, ki naj bi dobavili napačne vzorce.
Since both the source as well as the samples of the allegedly tested products were not clear and the results of the testing by the different parties were contradictory, it was considered that the submitted test report of the external laboratory acting on behalf of the Chinese exporting producer did not demonstrate conclusively that the resistance to picking test was not appropriate to distinguish between CFP suitable for use in web-fed printing on the one hand and CFP used in sheet-fed printing on the other hand.
Ker vir in vzorci domnevno preskušanih izdelkov niso bili jasni in so bili rezultati preskušanja različnih strani protislovni, se je štelo, da poročilo o preskusu, ki ga je zunanji laboratorij predložil v imenu kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika, ni prepričljivo pokazalo, da preskus odpornosti proti trganju ni ustrezen za razlikovanje med PFP, ki je primeren za rotacijsko tiskanje, in PFP, ki se uporablja pri formatnem tiskanju.
Consequently, the test report did not demonstrate that CFP used in web-fed printing had been arbitrarily excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Zato poročilo o preskušanju ni pokazalo, da je bil PFP, ki se uporablja pri rotacijskem tiskanju, samovoljno izključen iz obsega preiskave.
As regards the relevance of the resistance to picking as a distinguishing criterion for rolls suitable for web-fed printing, it is recalled that in the product definition the two product groups are distinguished from each other based on, among other things, the use of the products, i.e. whether the product is suitable for use in web-fed or sheet-fed printing as determined by the requirements of the presses on which they are used which is reflected in, inter alia, the characteristic of resistance to picking.
Glede ustreznosti odpornosti proti trganju kot razlikovalnega merila za zvitke, primerne za rotacijsko tiskanje, je treba spomniti, da se v opredelitvi izdelka ti dve skupini med seboj med drugim razlikujeta glede na uporabo izdelkov, tj. ali je izdelek primeren za uporabo v rotacijskem ali formatnem tiskanju v skladu z zahtevami tiskalnih strojev, na katerih se ti izdelki uporabljajo, kar se med drugim odraža v lastnosti odpornosti proti trganju.
Furthermore it is noted that resistance to picking is only one of the characteristics that distinguish CFP suitable for use in web-fed printing from CFP used in sheet fed printing; recitals (18) and (20) above set out additional criteria which have not been contested by the exporting producer concerned.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da je odpornost proti trganju samo ena od lastnosti, ki ločijo PFP, primeren za rotacijsko tiskanje, od PFP, ki se uporablja v formatnem tiskanju; uvodni izjavi (18) in (20) določata dodatna merila, ki jim zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik ni ugovarjal.
One party claimed that humidity as defined in recital (20) was not a distinct basic characteristic to distinguish products.
Ena stran je trdila, da vlažnost, kot je opredeljena v uvodni izjavi (20), ni razločevalna temeljna lastnost, ki bi omogočala razlikovanje med izdelki.
During the investigation however differing claims in this regard were made by other parties.
Vendar so med preiskavo v zvezi s tem druge strani trdile drugače.
In any event, it was found that stiffness and resistance to picking are the most relevant factors.
V vsakem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta trdota in odpornost proti trganju najustreznejša dejavnika.
In its responding submission, the complainant acknowledged that there might be rolls that do not fully meet all the criteria for resistance to picking referred to in recital (18) above, but which could still be used in web-fed printing.
Pritožnik je v pripombi, ki jo je na to predložil, priznal, da nekateri zvitki morda ne izpolnjujejo meril glede odpornosti proti trganju iz uvodne izjave (18), ki se jih lahko še vedno uporablja za rotacijsko tiskanje.
However, it maintained its view that resistance to picking is the only test that is able to identify with certainty that a roll is indeed suitable for web-fed printing, i.e. if a roll meets the criteria for resistance to picking referred to in recital (18) above, it is certainly a web roll.
Vendar je še naprej vztrajal pri mnenju, da je odpornost proti trganju edini preskus, ki lahko z gotovostjo pokaže, da je zvitek dejansko primeren za rotacijsko tiskanje, tj. če zvitek izpolnjuje merila iz uvodne izjave (18), je zagotovo zvitek za rotacijsko tiskanje.
In support of the above claims concerning resistance to picking the exporting producer referred to arguments put forward by one of the complainant Union producers in anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations in the USA in which the Union producer allegedly acknowledged that web rolls cannot be differentiated based on resistance to picking test or by any other measurement.
Za podporo navedenim trditvam glede odpornosti proti trganju se je proizvajalec izvoznik skliceval na trditve enega izmed proizvajalcev Unije pritožnika v protidampinški in protisubvencijski preiskavi v ZDA, v katerih je proizvajalec Unije domnevno priznal, da zvitkov za rotacijsko tiskanje ni mogoče razlikovati na podlagi preskusa odpornosti proti trganju ali katere druge meritve.