natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The continuation of the anti-dumping measures on imports from the country concerned would enhance the possibility for the Union industry to reach a reasonable level of profitability, as it would help avoiding that the Union industry is pushed out of the market by substantial volumes of dumped imports from the PRC.
Nadaljevanje protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz iz zadevne države bi povečalo možnost, da industrija Unije doseže razumno stopnjo dobičkonosnosti, saj bi pomagalo preprečiti, da bi bila industrija Unije izrinjena s trga s pomočjo znatnega obsega dampinškega uvoza iz LRK.
Two unrelated Union importers cooperated in the investigation.
V preiskavi sta sodelovala dva nepovezana uvoznika Unije.
Both opposed the continuation of the measures and claimed that the measures were ineffective, that Chinese products are not comparable to like products produced by the Union industry due to quality differences and expressed doubts about the competitiveness of the Union okoumé plywood industry.
Oba sta nasprotovala nadaljevanju ukrepov in trdila, da so bili ukrepi neučinkoviti, da kitajski izdelki zaradi razlike v kakovosti niso primerljivi s podobnimi izdelki, ki jih proizvaja industrija Unije, ter izrazila dvome o konkurenčnosti industrije vezanih lesenih plošč okoumé v Uniji.
However, none of these claims have been substantiated.
Vendar nobena od teh trditev ni bila utemeljena.
In the absence of any evidence suggesting that the current anti-dumping measures in force considerably affected importers, it is concluded that the continuation of measures will not affect the Union importers to any significant extent.
Ker ni dokazov, da bi trenutno veljavni protidampinški ukrepi bistveno vplivali na uvoznike, se sklene, da nadaljevanje ukrepov ne bo znatno vplivalo na uvoznike Unije.
Interest of users in the Union
Interes uporabnikov Unije
Questionnaire replies were received from three users located in Italy, Greece and France respectively.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so vrnili trije uporabniki iz Italije, Grčije in Francije.
Given that none of them purchased the product concerned from the PRC and in the absence of further evidence suggesting that the current anti-dumping measures in force considerably affected users, it can be concluded that the maintenance of the measures would not have a significant negative impact on users in the Union.
Ker nobeden od njih zadevnega izdelka ni kupoval iz LRK in ker ni bilo nadaljnjih dokazov, da trenutno veljavni protidampinški ukrepi bistveno vplivajo na uporabnike, se lahko sklene, da ohranitev ukrepov ne bi imela znatnega negativnega vpliva na uporabnike Unije.
It is thus considered that no compelling Union interest reasons exist against the maintenance of the measures in force.
Zato se sklene, da proti ohranitvi veljavnih ukrepov ni nobenih utemeljenih razlogov glede interesov Unije.
Rate of duty
Stopnja dajatve v
The submissions and comments were duly taken into consideration where warranted.
Stališča in pripombe so bili ustrezno upoštevani, kjer je bilo to upravičeno.
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) and Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of okoumé plywood originating in the PRC should be maintained.
Iz navedenega sledi, kot je določeno v členu 11(2) in (3) osnovne uredbe, da je treba ohraniti protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz vezanih lesenih plošč okoumé s poreklom iz LRK.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation are solely applicable to imports of the product concerned produced by these companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Individualne stopnje protidampinške dajatve za družbe iz te uredbe se uporabljajo le za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajajo te družbe in tako določeni navedeni pravni subjekti.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [6] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for instance, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh individualnih stopenj protidampinške dajatve (npr. zaradi spremembe imena subjekta ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba vložiti pri Komisiji [6] skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe glede proizvodnje, domače prodaje in izvoza, povezanimi na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali navedeno spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, this Regulation will then be accordingly amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Ta uredba bo po potrebi ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama družb, upravičenih do individualnih stopenj dajatve.
In order to minimise the risks of circumvention due to the high difference in the duty rates, it is considered that special measures are needed in this case to ensure the proper application of the anti-dumping duty.
Da se zmanjša tveganje izogibanja zaradi velike razlike v stopnjah dajatve, se šteje, da so v tem primeru potrebni posebni ukrepi za zagotovitev ustrezne uporabe protidampinške dajatve.
These special measures include the presentation to the Customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Ti posebni ukrepi vključujejo predložitev veljavne trgovinske fakture carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladna z zahtevami iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Imports not accompanied by such an invoice shall be made subject to the anti-dumping duty applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Za uvoz, ki ga taka faktura ne spremlja, velja protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Should the exports by one of the companies benefiting from lower individual duty rates increase significantly in volume after the imposition of the measures concerned, such an increase in volume could be considered as constituting in itself a change in the pattern of trade due to the imposition of measures within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Če bi se po uvedbi zadevnih ukrepov znatno povečal obseg izvoza ene od družb, za katere veljajo nižje individualne stopnje dajatev, bi se tako povečanje obsega obravnavalo kot sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja, nastala zaradi uvedbe ukrepov v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
In such circumstances and provided the conditions are met an anti-circumvention investigation may be initiated.
V takih okoliščinah in če so izpolnjeni pogoji, se lahko začne preiskava proti izogibanju.
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of okoumé plywood, defined as plywood consisting solely of sheets of wood, each ply not exceeding 6 mm thickness, with at least one outer ply of okoumé not coated by a permanent film of other materials, currently falling within CN code ex44123110 (TARIC code 4412311010) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz vezanih lesenih plošč okoumé, opredeljenih kot vezane lesene plošče, sestavljene samo iz lesenih listov, katerih posamezna debelina ne presega 6 mm, z najmanj eno zunanjo plastjo lesa okoumé, ki niso prevlečene s trajno folijo ali z drugimi materiali, trenutno uvrščene v tarifno oznako KN ex44123110 (TARIC oznaka 4412311010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Province, People’s Republic of China
Ljudska republika Kitajska
Province 235323, People’s Republic of China
235323, Ljudska republika Kitajska
If no such invoice is presented, the duty rate applicable to all other companies shall apply.
Če družbe take fakture ne predložijo, se uporablja stopnja dajatve, ki velja za vse druge družbe.
The partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 is hereby terminated.
Delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 je s tem zaključen.
OJ C 114, 19.5.2009, p. 11.
UL C 114, 19.5.2009, str. 11.
OJ C 270, 11.11.2009, p. 24.
UL C 270, 11.11.2009, str. 24.
A declaration signed by an official of the entity issuing the commercial invoice, in the following format, must appear on the valid commercial invoice referred to in Article 1(3):
Izjava, ki jo podpiše uradnik pravne osebe, ki je izdala trgovinsko fakturo, mora biti na veljavni trgovinski fakturi iz člena 1(3) in v naslednji obliki:
The following declaration: ‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (volume) of [product concerned] sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in (country concerned).
Naslednja izjava: „Podpisani potrjujem, da je (količina) [zadevnega izdelka], prodanega za izvoz v Evropsko unijo, ki jo zajema ta trgovinski račun, proizvedla (ime in naslov družbe) (dodatna oznaka TARIC) v (zadevni državi).
I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’
Izjavljam, da so podatki na tej trgovinski fakturi popolni in resnični.“
Actual imports of the product concerned into the Union dropped from 83606 m3 in the original IP to 23531 m3 in 2006.
Dejanski uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Unijo se je s 83606 m3 v prvotnem obdobju preiskave zmanjšal na 23531 m3 v letu 2006.
Thereafter, these imports increased by more than 20 % between 2006 and 2008 and dropped sharply between 2008 and the RIP to 54 % of the 2006 level.
Nato se je uvoz povečal za več kot 20 % med letoma 2006 in 2008 ter se med letom 2008 in OPP močno zmanjšal na 54-odstotno raven iz leta 2006.
The corresponding market share increased by 3,4 percentage points between 2006 and 2007.
Ustrezni tržni delež se je med letoma 2006 in 2007 povečal za 3,4 odstotne točke.
It decreased by 1,3 percentage points between 2007 and 2008 and dropped further by 4,1 percentage points between 2008 and the RIP.
Med letoma 2007 in 2008 se je zmanjšal za 1,3 odstotne točke, med letom 2008 in OPP pa se je še dodatno zmanjšal za 4,1 odstotne točke.
The production capacity of the Union industry has increased by 33 % between 2006 and 2007 and further by 12 percentage points between 2007 and 2008.
Proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Unije se je med letoma 2006 in 2007 povečala za 33 %, med letoma 2007 in 2008 pa še za dodatnih 12 odstotnih točk.
Between 2008 and the RIP, production capacity remained stable.
Med letom 2008 in OPP je proizvodna zmogljivost ostala stabilna.
Between 2006 and 2007 average sales prices of the Union industry on the Union market to unrelated customers increased by 13 % and by a further 5 percentage points between 2007 and 2008.
Povprečne prodajne cene industrije Unije nepovezanim strankam na trgu Unije so se med letoma 2006 in 2007 povečale za 13 %, med letoma 2007 in 2008 pa še za nadaljnjih 5 odstotnih točk.
During the RIP, these prices turned back to the level of 2007.
Med OPP so se cene vrnile na raven iz leta 2007.
Altogether, Union sales prices have increased by 13 % over the period considered.
Povprečne prodajne cene v Uniji so se v obravnavanem obdobju povečale za 13 %.
More specifically, it dropped by 3 percentage points between 2006 and 2007 and remained fairly stable between 2007 and 2008.
Natančneje se je med letoma 2006 in 2007 zmanjšal za 3 odstotne točke, med letoma 2007 in 2008 pa je ostal razmeroma stabilen.
Between 2008 and the RIP it increased by 8,6 percentage points to 80,2 %.
Med letom 2008 in OPP se je zmanjšal za 8,6 odstotne točke na 80,2 %.
Two other Union producers sampled in the original investigation closed down in 2005 and 2006 respectively.
Dva druga proizvajalca Unije, vzorčena v prvotni preiskavi, sta dejavnost zaprla leta 2005 oziroma 2006.
Another French producer also closed down at the beginning of 2009.
Še en francoski proizvajalec je dejavnost zaprl v začetku leta 2009.
In addition, a Greek producer has substantially reduced production.
Poleg tega je grški proizvajalec proizvodnjo znatno zmanjšal.
These developments, even though they may have contributed to an increased market share of the remaining Union producers, show that the Union industry on the whole is still fragile and vulnerable.
Čeprav je tak razvoj morda prispeval k povečanju tržnega deleža ostalih proizvajalcev Unije, pa kaže, da je celotna industrija Unije še vedno krhka in ranljiva.
In the above mentioned court proceeding, the French Conseil de la Concurrence fined six French plywood producers for anti-competitive behaviour (i.e. applying the same price grills and simultaneous price increases) during the period November 1995 to May 2004.
Francoski svet za konkurenco (Conseil de la Concurrence) je v navedenem postopku šest francoskih proizvajalcev vezanih lesenih plošč oglobil zaradi nekonkurenčnega ravnanja (tj. uporabe enakih preglednic cen in hkratnih dvigov cen) med novembrom 1995 in majem 2004.
In its judgement of 29 September 2009, the Cour d’Appel de Paris confirmed the decision of the Conseil de la Concurrence although it somewhat reduced the level of the fines.
V sodbi z dne 29. septembra 2009 je pritožbeno sodišče v Parizu (Cour d’Appel de Pariz) potrdilo odločbo sveta za konkurenco, čeprav je nekoliko znižalo globe.
Therefore, even if the injury picture would look more nuanced when excluding the fined French companies, there would still have been material injury in the original investigation.
Kljub temu, da bi bila škoda v prvotni preiskavi z izključitvijo oglobljenih francoskih proizvajalcev natančneje opredeljena, bi bila škoda še vedno znatna.
This follows, in particular, from the development of the so-called microeconomic indicators.
To izhaja zlasti iz razvoja tako imenovanih mikroekonomskih kazalnikov.
Xingdong Town, Tongzhou City, Jiangsu
Xingdong Town, Tongzhou City, Provinca Jiangsu,
Xue Lou Miao Pu, Dangshan County, Anhui
Xue Lou Miao Pu, Dangshan County, Provinca Anhui
North of Ganyao Town, Jiashan, Zhejiang
North of Ganyao Town, Jiashan, Provinca Zhejiang
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 83/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 83/2011
implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010
o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu in razveljavitvi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 610/2010
On 12 July 2010, the Council adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 [2], establishing an updated list of persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies.
Svet je 12. julija 2010 sprejel Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 610/2010 o izvajanju člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001 [2], v kateri je posodobljen seznam oseb, skupin in organizacij, za katere se uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 2580/2001.
The Council has provided all the persons, groups and entities for which it was practically possible with statements of reasons explaining why they were listed in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010.
Svet je pripravil utemeljitve, v katerih vsaki osebi, skupini in organizaciji, za katere je bilo to praktično izvedljivo, pojasni razloge, zakaj so bili navedeni na seznamu iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 610/2010.
In the case of one group, an amended statement of reasons was provided in November 2010.
V primeru ene skupine je bila novembra 2010 pripravljena spremenjena utemeljitev.
By way of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], the Council informed the persons, groups and entities listed in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010 that it had decided to keep them on the list.
Z objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3] je Svet obvestil osebe, skupine in organizacije, navedene na seznamu iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 610/2010, da jih namerava obdržati na seznamu.
In the case of five groups, an amended statement of reasons was made available in November 2010 [4].
V primeru petih skupin je bila spremenjena utemeljitev na voljo novembra 2010 [4].
When doing so it took account of observations submitted to the Council by those concerned.
Ob tem je upošteval pripombe, ki so jih zadevni predložili Svetu.
Subject to the appeal pending in Case T-348/07, the Council has concluded that the persons, groups and entities listed in the Annex to this Regulation have been involved in terrorist acts within the meaning of Article 1(2) and (3) of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism [5], that a decision has been taken with respect to them by a competent authority within the meaning of Article 1(4) of that Common Position, and that they should continue to be subject to the specific restrictive measures provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001.
Brez poseganja v pritožbo v zadevi T-348/07 je Svet sklenil, da so osebe, skupine in organizacije iz Priloge k tej uredbi povezane s terorističnimi dejanji v smislu člena 1(2) in (3) Skupnega stališča Sveta 2001/931/SZVP z dne 27. decembra 2001 o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu [5], da je pristojni organ v zvezi z njimi sprejel odločitev v smislu člena 1(4) navedenega skupnega stališča in da bi morali zanje še naprej veljati posebni omejevalni ukrepi iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001.
Due to the appeal pending in Case T-348/07, the Council has determined that Council Decision 2010/386/CFSP [6] should not be repealed with regard to one group.
Zaradi pritožbe v zadevi T-348/07 je Svet sklenil, da se Sklep Sveta 2010/386/SZVP [6] ne bi smel razveljaviti v zvezi z eno skupino.
The review in respect of that group is ongoing.
Trenutno se izvaja pregled sklepa v zvezi s to skupino.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010 is hereby repealed except in so far as it concerns the group mentioned in entry number 25 in Part 2 of the Annex thereto.
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 610/2010 se razveljavi, razen v zvezi s skupino, omenjeno v točki številka 25 dela 2 Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi.
OJ L 178, 13.7.2010, p. 1.
UL L 178, 13.7.2010, str. 1.
OJ C 188, 13.7.2010, p. 13.
UL C 188, 13.7.2010, str. 13.
OJ C 316, 20.11.2010, p. 11.
UL C 316, 20.11.2010, str. 11.
‘İslami Büyük Doğu Akıncılar Cephesi’ — ‘IBDA-C’ (‘Great Islamic Eastern Warriors Front’)
„İslami Büyük Doğu Akıncılar Cephesi“„IBDA-C“ („Great Islamic Eastern Warriors Front“ (Fronta islamskih bojevnikov velikega vzhoda));
‘Kurdistan Workers’ Party’ — ‘PKK’, (aka ‘KADEK’, aka ‘KONGRA-GEL’)
„Kurdistan Workers’ Party“ (Delavska stranka Kurdistana) – „PKK“ (alias „KADEK“, alias „KONGRA-GEL“);
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 84/2011
Having regard to Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against certain officials of Belarus [1] as amended by Council Decision 2011/69/CFSP of 31 January 2011 [2],
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2010/639/SZVP z dne 25. oktobra 2010 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim uradnikom Belorusije [1], kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2011/69/SZVP z dne 31. januarja 2011 [2],
Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP as amended provides for the freezing of funds and economic resources of, inter alia, the persons who are responsible for the violations of international electoral standards in the presidential elections in Belarus on 19 December 2010, and the crackdown on civil society and democratic opposition, as well as of those natural or legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them.
Sklep Sveta 2010/639/SZVP, kakor je bil spremenjen, določa, da se med drugim zamrznejo sredstva in gospodarski viri oseb, ki so odgovorne za kršenje mednarodnih volilnih standardov v zvezi s predsedniškimi volitvami v Belorusiji 19. decembra 2010, ter za izvajanje represivnih ukrepov nad civilno družbo in demokratično opozicijo, pa tudi z njimi povezanih fizičnih in pravnih oseb, subjektov ali organov.
These measures fall within the scope of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and, therefore, notably with a view to ensuring their uniform application by economic operators in all Member States, regulatory action at the level of the Union is necessary in order to implement them.
Ti ukrepi spadajo v področje uporabe Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in je zato predvsem zaradi zagotavljanja, da jih bodo gospodarski subjekti v vseh državah članicah enotno uporabljali, za njihovo izvajanje potreben regulativen ukrep na ravni Unije.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and notably the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial and the right to the protection of personal data.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznava zlasti Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, še posebej pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in nepristranskega sojenja ter pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov.
The power to amend the lists in Annexes I and IA to this Regulation should be exercised by the Council, in view of the specific threat to international peace and security posed by the situation in Belarus, and to ensure consistency with the process for amending and reviewing the Annex to Decision 2011/69/CFSP.
Zaradi posebne nevarnosti, ki jo za mednarodni mir in varnost predstavljajo razmere v Belorusiji, ter zaradi zagotavljanja skladnosti s postopkom za spremembo in pregled Priloge k Sklepu 2011/69/SZVP bi moral biti za spremembe seznamov v prilogah I in IA k tej uredbi pristojen Svet.
The procedure for amending the lists in Annexes I and IA to this Regulation should include providing designated natural or legal persons, entities or bodies with the grounds for their being listed, so as to give them an opportunity to submit observations.
V okviru postopka za spremembo seznamov v prilogah I in IA k tej uredbi bi bilo treba določene fizične ali pravne osebe, subjekte ali organe obvestiti o razlogih za njihovo vključitev na seznam, da bi jim dali možnost, da predložijo pripombe.
Where observations are submitted, or substantial new evidence is presented, the Council should review its decision in light of those observations and inform the person, entity or body concerned accordingly.
Kadar se predložijo pripombe ali novi tehtni dokazi, bi moral Svet pregledati svoj sklep glede na navedene pripombe in ustrezno obvestiti zadevno osebo, subjekt ali organ.
For the implementation of this Regulation, and in order to create maximum legal certainty within the Union, the names and other relevant data concerning natural and legal persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are to be frozen in accordance with this Regulation, should be made public.
Za izvajanje te uredbe in za zagotavljanje čim večje pravne varnosti v Uniji bi bilo treba imena in druge ustrezne podatke o fizičnih in pravnih osebah, subjektih in organih, katerih sredstva in gospodarski viri se v skladu s to uredbo zamrznejo, razkriti javnosti.
Any processing of personal data should respect Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [3] and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [4].
Pri vsakršni obdelavi osebnih podatkov bi bilo treba upoštevati Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [3] ter Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [4].