natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the respective Local Public Transport Scheme (Nahverkehrsplan) [21] or, for a transitional period after the entry into force of the new financing system [22], decisions of the respective city and district councils, and the respective financing notices by VRR based on VRR’s Financing Guidelines further clarify the public service obligations.
Obveznosti javne službe so natančneje določene v načrtu lokalnega prevoza [21], za prehodno obdobje po začetku veljavnosti „novega sistema financiranja“ [22] pa v sklepih zadevnih mestnih in okrožnih svetov ter ustreznih odločbah združenja VRR o financiranju, temelječih na direktivi o financiranju.
The public service obligations are therefore imposed by way of a threefold act of entrustment (i.e. by means of licences, the Local Public Transport Schemes and the respective financing notice by VRR based on VRR’s Financing Guidelines).
Zato se pooblastitev za obveznosti javne službe izvede s trojnim aktom o pooblastitvi (to pomeni z dovoljenji, načrti lokalnega prevoza in ustrezno odločbo združenja VRR o financiranju na podlagi direktive o financiranju).
In respect of RBG, the city council of Düsseldorf approved VRR’s new financing system by decision of 15 December 2005 in which it also decided to base its Local Public Transport Scheme on the Financing Guidelines which are part of the new financing system.
Mestni svet občine Düsseldorf je v zvezi s podjetjem RBG s sklepom z dne 15. decembra 2005 odobril novi sistem financiranja združenja VRR. Po tem sklepu načrt lokalnega prevoza za mesto Düsseldorf temelji tudi na direktivi o financiranju, ki je del novega sistema financiranja.
All of these Local Public Transport Schemes contain provisions on the network (services and infrastructure) to be provided by RBG.
Vsi ti načrti lokalnega prevoza vsebujejo določbe o omrežju, ki ga zagotavlja RBG (storitve in infrastruktura).
RBG holds licences under the PBefG for the bus and (overground and underground) tram routes operated by it.
Podjetje RBG je na podlagi PBefG upravičeno do dovoljenj za avtobusne in (nad- in podzemne) tramvajske proge, ki jih upravlja.
The Local Public Transport Scheme 2004 for the district of Mettmann contains provisions on the network (services and infrastructure) to be provided by BSM.
Načrt lokalnega prevoza za leto 2004 za okrožje Mettmann vsebuje določbe o omrežju, ki ga zagotavlja BSM (storitve in infrastruktura).
BSM holds licences under the PBefG for the bus routes operated by it.
Podjetje BSM je na podlagi PBefG upravičeno do dovoljenj za avtobusne proge, ki jih upravlja.
COST CATEGORY 1: INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION
KATEGORIJA STROŠKOV 1: ZAGOTAVLJANJE IN VZDRŽEVANJE INFRASTRUKTURE:
Germany stated that, for the operation of public transport services, an undertaking has to be equipped with vehicles.
Nemčija pojasnjuje, da mora biti podjetje za opravljanje storitev javnega prevoza opremljeno z ustreznimi vozili.
It emphasised that in Germany and all other Member States the infrastructure used for the provision of public transport services is usually provided by the State.
V Nemčiji in vseh drugih državah članicah praviloma država zagotavlja infrastrukturo, ki se uporablja pri opravljanju storitev javnega prevoza.
Therefore, Germany is of the opinion that the provision of infrastructure does not confer any economic advantage on the operators in question.
Zato se po mnenju Nemčije z zagotavljanjem infrastrukture zadevnim izvajalcem ne zagotavlja ekonomska prednost.
In addition, it emphasised that VRR is financing only the maintenance and not the construction of infrastructure.
Nemčija še poudarja, da VRR financira le vzdrževanje infrastrukture, ne pa tudi gradnje.
Moreover, VRR does not finance the full maintenance costs, but only the fixed costs (the variable costs of infrastructure utilisation are not compensated).
Poleg tega ne financira celotnih stroškov vzdrževanja, temveč le stalne stroške (spremenljivi stroški uporabe infrastrukture se ne poravnavajo).
Germany provided an analysis of the additional burden deriving from the public service obligation, taking into account several criteria, in particular the utilisation of the capacity of the infrastructure.
Nemčija je predložila analizo o večjem bremenu, izhajajočem iz obveznosti javne službe, v kateri se upošteva več meril, predvsem pa uporaba infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti.
Any revenue deriving from the use of the infrastructure (e.g. advertising) was subtracted from the calculation of the additional costs.
Prihodki, ki izhajajo iz uporabe infrastrukture (na primer oglaševanja), so se pri izračunu dodatnih stroškov upoštevali kot odbitek.
Under the terms of the PBefG and its implementing legislation [24], RBG and BSM are obliged to keep the infrastructure necessary for the operation of the transport services for which they hold licences ready for use according to certain quality standards (most importantly regarding the equipment of stops).
Podjetji RBG in BSM morata na podlagi PBefG in pripadajočih izvedbenih predpisov [24] zagotavljati, da je infrastruktura, potrebna za opravljanje tistih storitev prevoza, za katere imata dovoljenja, pripravljena za uporabo v skladu z zadevnimi standardi kakovosti (predvsem v zvezi z opremo postaj).
They are both subject to additional requirements going beyond these legal requirements, which are contained in VRR’s guidelines on the equipment of stops ( Richtlinie Haltestellenausstattung im VRR 08/1991) and in the respectively applicable Local Public Transport Schemes.
Za obe podjetji veljajo še dodatne zahteve, ki presegajo okvir teh predpisov ter so zajete v „Richtlinie Haltestellenausstattung im VRR 08/1991“ (direktiva o opremi postaj za združenje VRR) in veljavnih načrtih lokalnega prevoza.
For RBG, this concerns for instance a dynamic passenger information system at 192 of the stops and a computerised operations control system.
Pri podjetju RBG se to nanaša denimo na dinamični potniški informacijski sistem na 192 postajah in računalniško podprt sistem za nadzor obratovanja.
The additional requirements for BSM pertain to safety, information at stops, comfort and cleanliness.
Dodatne zahteve za podjetje BSM se nanašajo na varnost, informacije na postajah, udobje in čistost.
COST CATEGORY 2: MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING TASKS IMPOSED BY VRR OR THE COMPETENT LOCAL AUTHORITY
KATEGORIJA STROŠKOV 2: DODATNI REŽIJSKI STROŠKI IN STROŠKI PRODAJE, KI SE NANAŠAJO NA ZDRUŽENJE OZIROMA NOSILCE NALOG
Germany provided additional clarifications with regard to this cost category, which contains in particular costs arising from retailing and marketing activities (e.g. support for ticket subscriptions, provision of facilities for commuters such as park and ride areas and their advertising, support for organisers of major events, call centres), allocation of the revenues and further coordination tasks.
Nemčija dodatno pojasnjuje to kategorijo stroškov, ki predvsem z režijskimi in prodajnimi nalogami (na primer podporo abonmajev, zagotavljanjem parkirišč P + R za dnevne migrante in ustreznim oglaševanjem, podporo organizatorjem velikih dogodkov, klicnim centrom) zajema posebne stroške, ter porazdelitev prihodkov in nadaljnje naloge koordinacije.
In this cost category the revenue attributable is deducted in order to calculate the costs related to the additional burden imposed by the public authorities.
V tej kategoriji stroškov se prihodki, ki se pripišejo, upoštevajo kot odbitek, da je mogoče izračunati dodatne stroške, ki se nanašajo na večje breme, ki ga določi pristojni organ.
No legal requirements pertain to this category.
Pri tej kategoriji ni pravnih zahtev.
RBG and BSM are required to discharge these tasks by virtue of a cooperation agreement and an allocation of revenue agreement which they have with VRR and which are a prerequisite for their participation in VRR’s financing system.
Podjetji RBG in BSM morata te naloge opravljati v okviru sporazuma o sodelovanju in sporazuma o porazdelitvi prihodkov, ki sta ju sklenili z združenjem VRR in pomenita temeljni pogoj za njuno udeležbo v sistemu financiranja združenja VRR.
Guidelines to the cooperation agreement contain details of these tasks.
Smernice glede sporazuma o sodelovanju vsebujejo podrobnosti o teh nalogah.
Both RBG and BSM are subject to further tasks in this category under the terms of the Local Public Transport Plan of the district of Mettmann.
RBG in BSM morata na podlagi načrta lokalnega prevoza za okrožje Mettmann izpolnjevati nadaljnje naloge v tej kategoriji.
The respective financing notice by VRR is to be regarded as the last step of the act of entrustment.
Vsakokratna odločba združenja VRR o financiranju pomeni zadnjo stopnjo akta o pooblastitvi.
COST CATEGORY 3: VEHICLE QUALITY STANDARDS IMPOSED BY VRR OR THE COMPETENT LOCAL AUTHORITY
KATEGORIJA STROŠKOV 3: STANDARDI KAKOVOSTI VOZIL, KI SE NANAŠAJO NA ZDRUŽENJE OZIROMA NOSILCE NALOG
According to the clarifications provided by Germany, the additional costs connected with vehicle quality standards derive from requirements set by VRR and/or local authorities.
Glede na pojasnila Nemčije so dodatni stroški, povezani s standardi kakovosti vozil, posledica zahtev, ki so jih podali VRR in/ali nosilci nalog.
Such quality requirements are, for example, more environmentally friendly vehicles than legally necessary, or the use of air-conditioned or low-floor vehicles.
Te se na primer nanašajo na zakonsko predpisana okolju prijazna vozila ter uporabo klimatiziranih ali nizkopodnih vozil.
These requirements can be set for the whole VRR area or at a local level by the respective cities or districts.
Zadevna mesta ali okrožja lahko te zahteve določijo za celotno območje združenja VRR ali na lokalni ravni.
The same principles as in the previous categories apply to the calculation of the additional burden for the public transport undertakings.
Pri izračunu večjega bremena za podjetja, ki opravljajo storitve mestnega javnega prevoza, se upoštevajo enaka načela kot pri predhodno navedenih kategorijah.
The Local Public Transport Scheme of the city of Düsseldorf obliges RBG to invest in low-floor vehicles and enhanced environmentally friendly vehicles.
Po načrtu lokalnega prevoza za mesto Düsseldorf mora podjetje RBG vlagati v nizkopodna vozila in še posebej okolju prijazna vozila.
Furthermore, the city council of Düsseldorf has obliged RBG to install particulate filters in its diesel-engined vehicles.
Poleg tega je mestni svet občine Düsseldorf podjetju RBG naložil, da mora v svoja vozila z dizelskim motorjem vgraditi filtre delcev.
Under the terms of the Local Public Transport Plan of the district of Mettmann, BSM is to invest in low-floor vehicles.
Po načrtu lokalnega prevoza za okrožje Mettmann mora BSM vlagati v nizkopodna vozila.
COST CATEGORY 4: ADDITIONAL TRANSPORT SERVICES OR OTHER SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH OPERATION IMPOSED BY VRR OR THE COMPETENT LOCAL AUTHORITY
KATEGORIJA STROŠKOV 4: DODATNE STORITVE V PROMETU ALI DRUGAČE VREDNOTENE STORITVE, KI SE NANAŠAJO NA ZDRUŽENJE OZIROMA NOSILCE NALOG, NA OBMOČJU OBRATOVANJA:
Germany stated that this category consists of three clearly defined subcategories:
Nemčija pojasnjuje, da to kategorijo sestavljajo tri jasno opredeljene podkategorije:
Cost category 4a: Additional costs of unprofitable services in off-peak periods imposed by the competent local authority or by VRR: Germany explained that the public transport services provided during off-peak periods [25] requested by the public authorities are unprofitable.
Kategorija stroškov 4a: dodatni stroški zaradi nedobičkonosnih voženj v urah redkega prometa – zahteve nosilcev nalog oziroma združenja: kot pojasnjuje Nemčija, storitve, opravljene v urah redkega prometa [25], po navedbah nosilca nalog niso dobičkonosne.
However, these services are required by the public authorities (VRR or the respective cities and districts) for reasons of accessibility of transport services.
Vendar pristojni organ (VRR ali vsakokratna mesta in okrožja) te storitve zaradi dostopnosti storitev prevoza določi kot obvezne.
The obligations of RBG to provide transport services in off-peak periods are laid down by the Local Public Transport Schemes of the city of Düsseldorf, the Rhine district of Neuss and the district of Mettmann.
Obveznosti podjetja RBG glede opravljanja storitev prevoza v urah redkega prometa so opredeljene v načrtih lokalnega prevoza mesta Düsseldorf, porenskega okrožja Neuss in okrožja Mettmann.
BSM is obliged to provide off-peak transport services by virtue of the licences granted to it and the Local Public Transport Scheme of the district of Mettmann.
Podjetje BSM mora na podlagi izdanih dovoljenj in načrta lokalnega prevoza za okrožje Mettmann opravljati storitve prevoza v urah redkega prometa.
Cost category 4b: Social obligations in connection with operation imposed by the shareholder: With regard to this category Germany explained that RBG and BSM are obliged to apply the collective agreement concluded by the Municipal Employers Association of North Rhine-Westphalia (Kommunaler Arbeitgeberverband Nordrhein-Westfalen), which results in a higher average pay scale.
Kategorija stroškov 4b: družbenopolitične obveznosti na območju obratovanja – zahteve delničarja: Nemčija v zvezi s to kategorijo pojasnjuje, da morata podjetji RBG in BSM uporabiti kolektivno pogodbo, izpogajano z občinskim združenjem delodajalcev dežele Severno Porenje - Vestfalija, kar vodi do višjih povprečnih plač po veljavni plačni lestvici.
The municipal undertakings are also by virtue of collective agreements, which are not normally concluded by private undertakings in the sector, obliged to operate and/or contribute to company pension schemes.
Poleg tega morajo občinska podjetja po kolektivnih pogodbah, ki jih zasebna podjetja v panogi običajno ne sklenejo, zagotoviti dodatno pokojninsko zavarovanje ali prispevati delež k temu zavarovanju.
By virtue of its membership of a (public) supplementary pension fund, RBG has to make contributions for its employees to this fund.
Na podlagi članstva v (javni) zavarovalnici za dodatno zavarovanje mora RBG za svoje zaposlene plačevati prispevke za to zavarovanje.
Equally, BSM is obliged to operate a company pension scheme on the basis of the specific collective agreement.
Tudi podjetje BSM mora na podlagi posebne kolektivne pogodbe zagotoviti dodatno pokojninsko zavarovanje.
The costs are calculated as the difference between the reference pay scale (the pay scale contained in the collective agreement TV-N, group V, step 2 usually applied by private undertakings) and the actual pay which also includes the actual extra costs of the company pension scheme.
Ti stroški se izračunajo kot razlika med vrednostjo po referenčni plačni lestvici (v kolektivni pogodbi vsebovani plačni lestvici TV-N, ki jo po navadi uporabljajo zasebna podjetja, skupina V, stopnja 2) in dejansko plačo, vključno z dejanskimi dodatnimi stroški za poklicne pokojnine.
Cost category 4c: Other requirements in connection with operation or requirements inherent in the system imposed by the competent local authority or VRR which are justified individually and lead to an economic disadvantage: Germany explained that this is an open category under which, on the basis of individual proof, compensation can be granted for economic disadvantages stemming from requirements regarding the operations or requirements which pertain to the operation of a public transport system (e.g. special requirements with respect to environmental protection and the offer of additional services for major public events).
Kategorija stroškov 4c: druge zahteve za območje obratovanja oziroma sistemske zahteve – zahteve nosilcev nalog oziroma združenja na podlagi posebnega dokaza, ki pomenijo ekonomsko breme: Nemčija pojasnjuje, da je to odprta kategorija, pri kateri se lahko na podlagi posebnih dokazov odobri nadomestilo za ekonomsko breme, pogojeno z obratovalnimi zahtevami ali zahtevami za mestni javni prevoz (na primer posebne zahteve glede varstva okolja in ponudba dodatnih storitev ob velikih javnih dogodkih).
Germany pointed out that RBG and BSM are not subject to such requirements.
Nemčija pojasnjuje, da pri podjetjih RBG in BSM ni takih zahtev.
PARAMETERS ON THE BASIS OF WHICH THE COMPENSATION IS CALCULATED (SECOND ALTMARK CRITERION)
PARAMETRI, NA PODLAGI KATERIH SE IZRAČUNA NADOMESTILO (DRUGO MERILO ALTMARK)
Germany began its observations by providing information on and describing the process for setting the parameters for the calculation of the compensation.
Nemčija je v svojih pripombah uvodoma obrazložila postopek določitve parametrov za izračun nadomestila in predložila ustrezne informacije.
In relation to the parameters applied for the calculation of the compensation, Germany made a distinction between the different cost categories.
Pri parametrih za izračun nadomestila Nemčija razlikuje med posameznimi kategorijami stroškov.
Regarding infrastructure provision (cost category 1), Germany stated that VRR uses a certain amount – specific to each local network (Bedienungsgebiet) and to each mode of operation (Betriebszweig) – per kilometre of track or road used for transport services as parameter for the calculation of the compensation.
Nemčija v zvezi z zagotavljanjem in vzdrževanjem infrastrukture (kategorija stroškov 1) pojasnjuje, da VRR pri izračunu nadomestila glede na konkretno območje upravljanja in sektor obratovanja določi ustrezni znesek na kilometer tirov ali cest, in ta se uporabi kot parameter.
Regarding the management and marketing tasks imposed by VRR or the competent local authority (cost category 2), VRR uses – according to Germany – a certain amount of tariffs in relation to the net receipts of tariff increases which is specific to each local network and to each mode of operation as parameter for the calculation of the compensation.
Kar zadeva režijske in prodajne naloge, ki se nanašajo na združenje oziroma nosilce nalog (kategorija stroškov 2), VRR po navedbah Nemčije določi ustrezni znesek lastnih prihodkov, na katerem temelji izračun nadomestila glede na konkretno območje upravljanja in sektor obratovanja.
Regarding the vehicle quality standards imposed by VRR or the competent local authority (cost category 3), Germany stated that the parameter for the calculation of the compensation consists of a certain amount based on a standard vehicle of minimum quality, the amount being specific to each local network and to each mode of operation.
Nemčija v zvezi s standardi kakovosti vozil, ki se nanašajo na združenje oziroma nosilce nalog (kategorija stroškov 3), pojasnjuje, da gre pri parametru za izračun nadomestila glede na konkretno območje upravljanja in sektor obratovanja za poseben znesek, ki temelji na minimalni ravni kakovosti standardnega vozila.
Regarding the additional transport services or other services in connection with operation imposed by VRR or the competent local authority (cost category 4), Germany made a distinction between the three subcategories.
Nemčija pri dodatnih storitvah v prometu ali drugače vrednotenih storitvah, ki se nanašajo na združenje oziroma nosilce nalog, na območju obratovanja (kategorija stroškov 4) razlikuje med tremi podkategorijami.
For the first subcategory, namely the additional costs of unprofitable services in off-peak periods imposed by the competent local authority or by VRR (cost category 4a), VRR employs a parameter for the calculation of the compensation which is based on the difference between marginal revenue and marginal costs per kilometre.
VRR pri prvi podkategoriji „dodatni stroški zaradi nedobičkonosnih voženj v urah redkega prometa – zahteve nosilcev nalog oziroma združenja“ (kategorija stroškov 4a) za izračun nadomestila določi parameter, ki temelji na razliki med mejnimi prihodki in mejnimi stroški na kilometer.
This is specific to each local network and to each mode of operation.
V tem parametru se upoštevata območje upravljanja in sektor obratovanja.
Regarding the second subcategory, the parameter consists in an amount which is established by comparing the higher pay with the provisions of a certain collective agreement (‘TV-N, group V, step 2’) (cost category 4b), which is considered to contain almost the same pay scales, and then determining an amount per driver specific to each local network and each mode of operation.
Pri drugi podkategoriji gre pri parametru za znesek, ki izhaja iz primerjave višjih plač in določb konkretne kolektivne pogodbe („TV-N, skupina V, stopnja 2“) (kategorija stroškov 4b), ki vsebuje skoraj enake plačne lestvice. Nato se na podlagi tega parametra ter glede na območje upravljanja in sektor obratovanja določi ustrezni znesek za posameznega voznika.
Finally, according to Germany, other requirements in connection with the operation or requirements inherent in the system imposed by the competent local authority or VRR which are justified individually and lead to an economic disadvantage (cost category 4c) are always calculated on an individual basis, provided they are duly documented.
Končno se po navedbah Nemčije pri drugih zahtevah v zvezi z obratovanjem ali sistemom pristojnega organa ali združenja VRR, ki se utemeljujejo posamično in pomenijo ekonomsko breme (kategorija stroškov 4c), izračun vselej opravi posamično, če je podana ustrezna dokumentacija.
NO OVERCOMPENSATION (THIRD ALTMARK CRITERION)
NEOBSTOJ ČEZMERNE KOMPENZACIJE (TRETJE MERILO ALTMARK)
Germany explained that all transport undertakings in VRR are required by VRR to submit yearly reports on the expenditure of funds with a view to proving that no overcompensation in respect of the public service obligations occurs.
Nemčija pojasnjuje, da morajo vsi prevozniki v okviru združenja VRR predložiti letna dokazila o uporabi, in sicer zaradi potrditve, da pri obveznostih javne službe ni čezmerne kompenzacije.
These reports must contain the actual costs (expenditure minus earnings) incurred in the discharge of public service obligations and are then checked by a chartered accountant and VRR for accuracy and completeness.
Iz teh dokazil o uporabi morajo biti razvidni dejanski stroški, ki nastanejo pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti javne službe (odhodki, zmanjšani za prihodke), pravilnost in popolnost teh navedb pa nato preverita revizor in VRR.
Should VRR find out that, on the basis of these reports, there is overcompensation, such overcompensation would, according to Germany, be recovered.
Če bi združenje VRR na podlagi teh dokazil o uporabi ugotovilo obstoj čezmerne kompenzacije, bi se po navedbah Nemčije zahtevalo vračilo preveč izplačanih sredstev.
For recovery, it is necessary to distinguish between compensation paid by VRR on the basis of an administrative decision and compensation paid directly to the transport undertaking based on paragraph 19 of the ZV VRR ordinance.
V zvezi z zahtevo za vračilo je treba razlikovati med nadomestili, ki jih VRR izplača na podlagi upravnega akta, in neposrednimi nadomestili prevozniku na podlagi člena 19 statuta ZV VRR.
In the former case, the administrative decision is called a ‘positive financing notice’ (positiver Finanzierungsbescheid) pursuant to the Financing Guidelines.
V prvem primeru se upravni akt po direktivi o financiranju šteje za odobritveno odločbo o financiranju.
Pursuant to point 7.4.1 of the Financing Guidelines, VRR itself orders recovery of any overcompensation.
Združenje VRR v skladu z oddelkom 7.4.1 direktive o financiranju samo odredi vračilo preveč izplačanih sredstev.
In the latter case, VRR initially issues a ‘negative financing notice’ (ablehnender Finanzierungsbescheid) pursuant to point 7.4.2 of the Financing Guidelines or a ‘binding notice on the amount of permissible compensation’.
V drugem primeru VRR najprej izda zavrnilno odločbo o financiranju v skladu z oddelkom 7.4. direktive o financiranju ali zavezujoče obvestilo o višini dopustnih zneskov nadomestila.
In such a situation, point 8.3 of the Financing Guidelines stipulates that VRR is to inform the city or district owning the transport undertaking that it is obliged to recover the overcompensation.
V takem primeru je v oddelku 8.3 direktive o financiranju predvideno, da VRR obvesti mesto ali okrožje, ki je delničar prevoznika, o tem, da mora vrniti preveč izplačana sredstva.