natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in Article 14, paragraph 2, the following subparagraph is added:
Odstavku 2 člena 14 se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘By way of derogation from the first subparagraph Member States may fix an earlier latest date for the notification of amendments. That date shall however not be earlier than 15 calendar days after the latest date for submitting the single application fixed in accordance with Article 11(2).’;
„Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka države članice lahko določijo zgodnejši datum za priglasitev sprememb. Vendar pa ta datum ne sme biti prej, kot 15 koledarskih dni po datumu, ki je v skladu s členom 11(2) določen kot zadnji datum za predložitev enotnega zahtevka.“
in Part II, Title II, the title of Chapter IV is replaced by the following:
V delu II pod naslovom II se naslov poglavja IV nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Aid for sugar beet and cane producers, separate sugar payment, separate fruit and vegetables payment and separate soft fruit payment’;
„Pomoč za pridelovalce sladkorne pese in trsa, ločeno plačilo za sladkor, ločeno plačilo za sadje in zelenjavo ter ločeno plačilo za jagodičje“.
‘Requirements pertaining to applications for the aid for sugar beet and cane producers, the separate sugar payment, the separate fruit and vegetables payment and the separate soft fruit payment’;
„Zahteve v zvezi z zahtevki za pomoč za pridelovalce sladkorne pese in trsa, ločeno plačilo za sladkor, ločeno plačilo za sadje in zelenjavo ter ločeno plačilo za jagodičje“.
Farmers applying for the aid for sugar beet and cane producers provided for in Section 7 of Chapter 1 of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, for the separate sugar payment provided for in Article 126 of that Regulation, for the separate fruit and vegetables payment provided for in Article 127 or for the separate soft fruit payment provided for in Article 129 of that Regulation shall submit an aid application containing all information necessary to establish eligibility for the aid, and in particular:’;
Kmetje, ki zaprosijo za pomoč za pridelovalce sladkorne pese in trsa iz oddelka 7 poglavja 1 naslova IV Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, za ločeno plačilo za sladkor iz člena 126 navedene uredbe, za ločeno plačilo za sadje in zelenjavo iz člena 127 navedene uredbe ali za ločeno plačilo za jagodičje iz člena 129 navedene uredbe, predložijo zahtevek za pomoč, ki vsebuje vse informacije, potrebne za ugotovitev upravičenosti do pomoči, in zlasti:“.
in Article 28(1), point (f) is deleted;
V členu 28(1) se črta točka (f).
a new Article 31a is inserted:
Doda se nov člen 31a:
Combined on-the-spot checks
Združeni pregledi na kraju samem
By way of derogation from Article 31 and under the conditions set out in this Article, Member States may, as regards the single payment scheme and the single area payment scheme as referred to in Title III and Title V, Chapter 2 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, decide to replace the checks of the control sample to be established based on a risk analysis referred to in first subparagraph of Article 31(1) of this Regulation by checks based on the ortho images used for the update of the identification system for agricultural parcels referred to in Article 6.
Z odstopanjem od člena 31 in pod pogoji iz tega člena se države članice lahko glede sheme enotnega plačila in sheme enotnega plačila na površino iz naslova III in naslova V poglavja 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 odločijo, da preglede kontrolnega vzorca, ki se določi na podlagi analize tveganja iz prvega pododstavka člena 31(1) te uredbe, nadomestijo s pregledi, ki temeljijo na ortoposnetkih, ki se uporabljajo za posodabljanje sistema za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin iz člena 6.
The decision referred to in the first subparagraph may be taken at national level or regional level.
Odločitev iz prvega pododstavka se lahko sprejme na nacionalni ali na regionalni ravni.
A region shall be comprised of the whole area covered by one or more autonomous identification systems for agricultural parcels.
Regijo sestavlja cela površina, zajeta v enem ali več avtonomnih sistemih za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin.
Member States shall systematically update the identification system for agricultural parcels and check all farmers in the entire area covered by it within a period of maximum three years, covering per year at least 25 % of the eligible hectares recorded in the identification system for agricultural parcels.
Države članice sistematično posodabljajo svoj sistem za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin in pregledujejo vse kmete na celotni površini, ki jo sistem zajema najmanj vsaka tri leta in vsako leto je zajetih najmanj 25 % upravičenih hektarov, vpisanih v sistemu za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin.
However, a Member State with less than 150000 eligible hectares recorded in the identification system for agricultural parcels may derogate from the requirement of a minimum coverage per year.
Države članice, ki imajo v sistemu za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin vpisanih manj kot 150000 upravičenih hektarov, lahko odstopajo od zahteve najmanjšega zajetja na leto.
Before applying this Article, Member States shall have made a complete update of the identification system for agricultural parcels concerned within the previous three years.
Pred uporabo tega člena države članice popolnoma posodobijo zadevni sistem za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin v prejšnjih treh letih.
The ortho images used for the update shall not be older than 15 months at the date of their use for the purpose of the update of the identification system for agricultural parcels as referred to in the first subparagraph.
Ortoposnetki, ki se uporabljajo za posodobitev, na dan uporabe za posodobitev sistema za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin iz prvega pododstavka ne smejo biti starejši od 15 mesecev.
The quality of the identification system for agricultural parcels as assessed in accordance with Article 6(2) during the two years preceding the application of this Article, shall be sufficient to ensure effective verification of the conditions under which aids are granted.
Kakovost sistema za identifikacijo enot rabe ali poljin, ocenjena v skladu s členom 6(2) v dveh letih pred uporabo tega člena, je zadostna, da zagotovi učinkovito preverjanje pogojev, pod katerimi se pomoči dodelijo.
The rate of errors found in the random sample checked on-the-spot shall not exceed 2 % in the two years preceding the application of this Article.
Stopnja napak, ugotovljenih v naključnem vzorcu, ki se pregleda na kraju samem, v dveh letih pred uporabo tega člena ne presega 2 %.
Moreover, the rate of errors shall not exceed 2 % during two consecutive years when applying this Article.
Ko se uporablja ta člen, stopnja napak v dveh zaporednih letih ne presega 2 %.
The rate of errors shall be certified by the Member State in accordance with the methodology drawn up at Union level.
Stopnjo napak potrdi država članica v skladu z metodologijo, pripravljeno na ravni Unije.
Article 35(1) shall apply to the checks carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2, and 3.’;
Člen 35(1) se uporablja za preglede, ki se opravljajo v skladu z odstavki 1, 2 in 3.“
in Article 33, first paragraph, the first sentence is replaced by the following:
Prvi stavek prvega odstavka člena 33 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘On-the-spot checks shall cover all the agricultural parcels for which aid is requested under aid schemes listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 73/2009.’;
„Pregledi na kraju samem zajemajo vse enote rabe ali poljine, za katere se zahteva pomoč v okviru shem pomoči, navedenih v Prilogi I k Uredbi (EGS) št. 73/2009.“
Article 37 is deleted;
Člen 37 se črta.
Article 41 is replaced by the following:
Člen 41 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
At least 60 % of the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 30(2)(b) shall be spread throughout the entire retention period of the aid scheme concerned.
Vsaj 60 % najmanjše stopnje pregledov na kraju samem, določenih v drugem pododstavku člena 30(2)(b), se razporedi čez celotno obdobje obvezne reje za zadevno shemo pomoči.
However, where the retention period starts before an aid application has been lodged or where it cannot be fixed in advance, on-the-spot checks provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 30(2)(b) shall be spread over the year.
Kadar pa se obdobje obvezne reje začne pred vložitvijo zahtevka za pomoč ali ga ni mogoče določiti vnaprej, se pregledi na kraju samem, določeni v drugem pododstavku člena 30(2)(b), razporedijo čez vse leto.
At least 50 % of the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks provided for in Article 30(2)(c) shall be spread throughout the entire retention period.
Vsaj 50 % najmanjše stopnje pregledov na kraju samem, določenih v členu 30(2)(c), se razporedi čez celotno obdobje obvezne reje.
However, the total minimum rate of on-the-spot checks shall be fully conducted and spread throughout the retention period in Member States where the system established by Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 as concerns ovines and caprines, in particular in relation to the identification of animals and the proper keeping of registers, is not fully implemented and applied.’;
Najmanjša stopnja pregledov na kraju samem pa se v celoti izvede in razporedi čez obdobje obvezne reje v državah članicah, kadar se sistem, uveden z Uredbo (ES) št. 21/2004, v zvezi z ovcami in kozami, ter zlasti glede identifikacije živali in pravilnega vodenja registrov, ne izvaja in ne uporablja v celoti.“
On-the-spot checks shall verify that all eligibility conditions are fulfilled and cover all livestock for which aid applications have been submitted, including animals replaced during the retention period in accordance with Article 64 and which are still on the holding, under the aid schemes to be checked.
Pregledi na kraju samem preverijo, ali so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za upravičenost in zajemajo vse živali, za katere so bili vloženi zahtevki za pomoč v okviru shem pomoči, vključno z živalmi, ki so bile v obdobju obvezne reje nadomeščene v skladu s členom 64 in ki so še vedno na kmetijskem gospodarstvu.
In the case of checks of the bovine aid schemes and where the Member State makes use of the possibility provided for in Article 16(3), also the potentially eligible bovine animals shall be checked.
Pri pregledih shem pomoči za govedo in kadar država članica uporabi možnost iz člena 16(3), se pregleda tudi potencialno upravičeno govedo.
On-the-spot checks shall include in particular a check that the number of animals present on the holding for which aid applications have been submitted and, where applicable, the number of potentially eligible bovine animals corresponds to the number of animals entered in the registers and, in the case of bovine animals, to the number of animals notified to the computerised database for bovine animals.’;
Pregledi na kraju samem vključujejo zlasti preverjanje, ali število živali, prisotnih na kmetijskem gospodarstvu, za katere so bili vloženi zahtevki, in, kjer je to primerno, število potencialno upravičenega goveda, ustreza številu živali, vpisanih v registre, in pri govedu številu živali, priglašenih v računalniško zbirko podatkov za govedo.“;
that bovine animals are identified by ear tags, accompanied, where applicable, by animal passports and that they are recorded in the register and have been duly notified to the computerised database for bovine animals.
da je govedo identificirano z ušesnimi znamkami in da ga, kjer je to primerno, spremljajo potni listi za živali in da je vpisano v register ter da je bilo pravilno priglašeno v računalniško zbirko podatkov za govedo.
The checks referred to under point (d) may be made on the basis of a sample.’;
Pregledi iz točke (d) se lahko opravijo na podlagi vzorca.“
Articles 43 and 44 are deleted;
Člena 43 in 44 se črtata.
in Article 45, paragraphs 2 and 3 are deleted;
Odstavka 2 in 3 člena 45 se črtata.
In the case of applications for aid under area-related aid schemes if the area of a crop group determined is found to be greater than that declared in the aid application, the area declared shall be used for calculation of the aid.’;
Če se pri zahtevkih za pomoč v okviru shem pomoči na površino ugotovi, da je površina skupine posevkov večja od tiste, ki je prijavljena v zahtevku za pomoč, se za izračun pomoči uporabi prijavljena površina.“;
Without prejudice to reductions and exclusions in accordance with Articles 58 and 60, in the case of applications for aid under area-related aid schemes if the area declared in a single application exceeds the area determined for that crop group, the aid shall be calculated on the basis of the area determined for that crop group.’;
Brez poseganja v znižanja in izključitve v skladu s členoma 58 in 60 se pri zahtevkih za pomoč v okviru shem pomoči na površino, pomoč izračuna na podlagi površine, ugotovljene za to skupino posevkov, če površina, prijavljena v enotnem zahtevku, presega površino, ugotovljeno za to skupino posevkov.“
in Article 58, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
Prvi odstavek člena 58 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘If, in respect of a crop group, the area declared for the purposes of any area-related aid schemes exceeds the area determined in accordance with Article 57, the aid shall be calculated on the basis of the area determined reduced by twice the difference found if that difference is more than either 3 % or two hectares, but no more than 20 % of the area determined.’;
„Če je v zvezi s skupino posevkov površina, prijavljena za namene shem pomoči na površino, večja od površine, ugotovljene v skladu s členom 57, se pomoč izračuna na podlagi ugotovljene površine, znižane za dvakratno ugotovljeno razliko, če je ta razlika več kakor 3 % ali dva hektarja, vendar ne več kakor 20 % ugotovljene površine.“
Articles 59 and 61 are deleted;
Člena 59 in 61 se črtata.
a new paragraph 3a is inserted:
vstavi se nov odstavek 3a:
Where a farmer has failed to inform the competent authorities that animals have been moved to another location during the retention period, as required by the second subparagraph of Article 16(1), the animals concerned shall be regarded as determined if an immediate localisation of the animals within the holding was made at the on-the-spot check.’;
Če kmet pristojnih organov ni obvestil, da so bile živali premaknjene na drugo lokacijo v obdobju obvezne reje, kakor zahteva drugi pododstavek člena 16(1), se zadevne živali štejejo za ugotovljene, če se med pregledom na kraju samem takoj locirajo na gospodarstvu.“;
in paragraph 4, the following point (aa) is inserted:
v odstavek 4 se vstavi naslednja točka (aa):
‘(aa)
„(aa).
Where one single bovine animal of a holding has lost two ear tags it shall be regarded as determined provided that the animal can still be identified by register, animal passport, database or other means laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 and provided that the keeper can provide evidence that he has already taken action to remedy the situation before the announcement of the on-the-spot check;’;
Kadar je eno samo govedo na gospodarstvu izgubilo obe ušesni znamki, se šteje za ugotovljeno pod pogojem, da je žival še vedno mogoče identificirati z registrom, potnim listom za živali, zbirko podatkov ali na drug način, določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 1760/2000 in pod pogojem, da imetnik lahko dokaže, da je pred napovedjo pregleda na kraju samem izvedel ukrepe za izboljšanje stanja;“;
the following paragraph 5 is added:
doda se odstavek 5:
An ovine or caprine animal which has lost one ear tag shall be regarded as determined provided that the animal can still be identified by a first means of identification in accordance with Article 4(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 and provided that all other requirements of the system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals are fulfilled.’;
Ovca ali koza, ki je izgubila eno ušesno znamko, se šteje za ugotovljeno pod pogojem, da jo je še vedno mogoče identificirati s prvim sredstvom za identifikacijo v skladu s členom 4(2)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 21/2004 in pod pogojem, da so izpolnjene vse druge zahteve sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz.“
in Article 64(2), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 64(2) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘However, a Member State may provide that the notifications to the computerised database for bovine animals of an animal having left the holding and another animal having arrived on the holding within the time limits provided for in the first subparagraph may replace the information to be sent to the competent authority pursuant to the first subparagraph. In that case, where the Member State does not make use of the possibility provided for in Article 16(3) it shall ensure by any means that there are no doubts as to which animals are covered by the farmers applications.’;
„Država članica pa lahko določi, da priglasitve v računalniški zbirki podatkov za govedo o živali, ki je zapustila kmetijsko gospodarstvo, in o drugi živali, ki je prišla na gospodarstvo, v okviru rokov iz prvega pododstavka lahko nadomestijo informacije, ki jih je treba na podlagi prvega pododstavka poslati pristojnemu organu. Kadar država članica ne uporabi možnosti iz člena 16(3), v tem primeru z vsemi sredstvi zagotovi, da ni nobenega dvoma, katere živali so zajete v zahtevkih kmetov.“
in Article 65(3), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 65(3) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘In the case of application of the second subparagraph of Article 16(3), potentially eligible animals found not to be correctly identified or registered in the system for identification and registration for bovine animals shall count as animals found with irregularities.’;
„V primeru uporabe drugega pododstavka člena 16(3) se potencialno upravičene živali, za katere je ugotovljeno, da niso pravilno identificirane ali registrirane v sistemu za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda, štejejo za živali, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene nepravilnosti.“
in Article 66, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
V členu 66 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where, in respect of applications for aid under the ovine/caprine aid scheme, a difference is found between the number of animals declared and that determined in accordance with Article 63(3), Article 63(3a) and Article 63(5), Article 65(2), Article 65(3) and Article 65(4) shall apply mutatis mutandis as from the first animal in respect of which irregularities are found.’;
Kadar se pri zahtevkih za pomoč v okviru shem pomoči za ovce/koze ugotovi razlika med številom prijavljenih in številom ugotovljenih živali v skladu s členi 63(3), 63(3a) in 63(5), se smiselno uporabljajo členi 65(2), 65(3) in 65(4) že za prvo žival, za katero se ugotovijo nepravilnosti.“
Article 68 is deleted;
Člen 68 se črta.
in the first subparagraph of Article 78(2), point (d) is replaced by the following:
V prvem pododstavku člena 78(2) se točka (d) nadomesti z naslednjim:
with regard to those support schemes for which a budgetary ceiling is fixed in accordance with Article 51(2), Article 69(3), Article 123(1) and Article 128(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 or applied in accordance with Article 126(2), Article 127(2) and Article 129(2) of that Regulation, Member State shall add the amounts resulting from the application of points (a), (b) and (c) of this paragraph.’
glede tistih shem podpor, za katere je zgornja meja proračuna določena v skladu s členi 51(2), 69(3), 123(1) in 128(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 ali uporabljena v skladu s členi 126(2), 127(2) in 129(2) navedene uredbe, država članica doda zneske, ki izhajajo iz uporabe točk (a), (b) in (c) tega odstavka.“
It shall apply to aid applications relating to marketing years or premium periods starting from 1 January 2012.
Uporablja se za zahtevke za pomoč, ki se nanašajo na tržna leta ali premijska obdobja z začetkom 1. januarja 2012.
OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 16.
UL L 30, 31.01.2009, str. 16.
OJ L 204, 11.8.2000, p. 1
UL L 204, 11.8.2000, str.1.
OJ L 316, 2.12.2009, p. 27.’;
UL L 316, 2.12.2009, str. 27.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1369/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1369/2011
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) [1] and in particular Article 192(2), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 z dne 22. oktobra 2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode („Uredba o enotni SUT“) [1] in zlasti člena 192(2) v povezavi s členom 4 Uredbe,
After the introduction of the computerised system for transmitting sugar price information for the price recording system pursuant to Article 14 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 952/2006 [2], it is appropriate to increase the frequency at which the Commission submits such information to the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets.
Po uvedbi računalniškega sistema za prenos podatkov o ceni sladkorja sistemu, ki beleži cene v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 952/2006 [2], je primerno povečati pogostnost, s katero Komisija predloži taka obvestila Upravljalnemu odboru za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov.
‘Each month, the Commission shall inform the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets of the average price for white sugar communicated during the month preceding the date of the information.’
„Komisija vsak mesec obvesti Upravljalni odbor za skupno ureditev kmetijskih trgov o povprečni ceni za beli sladkor, ki je bila sporočena v mesecu pred datumom obvestila.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1370/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1370/2011
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Горнооряховски суджук (Gornooryahovski sudzhuk) (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb [Горнооряховски суджук (Gornooryahovski sudzhuk) (ZGO)]
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Bulgaria’s application to register the name ‘Горнооряховски суджук’ (Gornooryahovski sudzhuk) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Bolgarije za registracijo imena „Горнооряховски суджук“ (Gornooryahovski sudzhuk) objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
A statement of objection was lodged by Cyprus under Article 7(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Ciper je v skladu s členom 7(3)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 vložil ugovor.
By letter dated 31 January 2011, the Commission asked the Parties concerned to seek agreement among them.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 31. januarja 2011 zadevne strani pozvala, naj se sporazumejo.
An agreement was reached within six months and Cyprus withdrew its objection on 22 July 2011.
V šestih mesecih je bil dosežen dogovor in Ciper je 22. julija 2011 umaknil ugovor.
The name should therefore be entered in the register,
Zato je treba ime vpisati v register –
OJ C 77, 26.3.2010, p. 10.
UL C 77, 26.3.2010, str. 10.
Горнооряховски суджук (Gornooryahovski sudzhuk) (PGI)
Горнооряховски суджук (Gornooryahovski sudzhuk) (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1371/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1371/2011
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2011 imposing special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 961/2011 o uvedbi posebnih pogojev za uvoz krme in živil, ki izvirajo iz Japonske ali so od tam poslani, po nesreči v jedrski elektrarni Fukušima
Such contamination may constitute a threat to public and animal health in the Union and therefore Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2011 [2] was adopted.
Taka kontaminacija lahko ogrozi zdravje ljudi in živali v Uniji, zato je bila sprejeta Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 961/2011 [2].