natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
COM(2009) 163 final, p. 19.
COM(2009) 163 konč., str. 19.
CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGICAL STANDARDS FOR GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
MERILA IN METODOLOŠKI STANDARDI NA PODROČJU DOBREGA OKOLJSKEGA STANJA
General conditions of application of the criteria for good environmental status
Splošni pogoji uporabe meril na področju dobrega okoljskega stanja
In Part B, criteria are accompanied with references to applicable methodological standards where available.
V delu B merila spremlja sklicevanje na uporabne metodološke standarde, če so ti na voljo.
For a number of such criteria and related indicators, the need for further development and additional information is identified, to be further addressed in the process for the revision of this Decision [1].
V zvezi z več merili in z njimi povezanimi kazalci je bilo ugotovljeno, da so potrebni nadaljnji razvoj in dodatne informacije, to vprašanje pa bo obravnavano v procesu revizije tega sklepa [1].
This Part specifies the general conditions of application of such criteria and related indicators.
V tem delu so opredeljeni splošni pogoji uporabe teh meril in z njimi povezanih kazalcev.
For most criteria, the assessment and methodologies required need to take into account and, where appropriate, be based on those applicable under existing Community legislation, in particular Directive 2000/60/EC, Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], Directive 92/43/EEC, Directive 2009/147/EC and other relevant Union legislation (including under the common fisheries policy, e.g. Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 [3]), taking also into account reports of the Task Groups set up by the Joint Research Centre and the International Council on the Exploration of the Seas [4] and, where relevant, the information and knowledge gathered and the approaches developed in the framework of regional sea conventions.
Pri večini meril morajo ocena in metodologije upoštevati in po potrebi temeljiti na ocenah in metodologijah, ki se uporabljajo v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti v skladu z Direktivo 2000/60/ES, Direktivo 2008/105/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], Direktivo 92/43/EGS, Direktivo 2009/147/ES in drugo ustrezno zakonodajo Unije (vključno s skupno ribiško politiko, npr. Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 199/2008 [3]), pri čemer se upoštevajo tudi poročila delovnih skupin, ki sta jih ustanovila Skupno raziskovalno središče in Mednarodni svet za raziskovanje morja [4], ter po potrebi tudi informacije in znanje ter pristopi, pridobljeni v okviru regionalnih konvencij o morjih.
Good environmental status requires that all relevant human activities are carried out in coherence with the requirement of protecting and preserving the marine environment and the concept of sustainable use of marine goods and services by present and future generations referred to in Article 1 of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Da se zagotovi dobro okoljsko stanje, se morajo vse zadevne človekove dejavnosti izvajati v skladu z zahtevo po varovanju in ohranjanju morskega okolja ter v skladu z načelom trajnostne rabe morskega blaga in storitev sedanjih in prihodnjih generacij iz člena 1 Direktive 2008/56/ES.
The application of criteria for good environmental status needs to be carried out keeping in mind the need to target assessment and monitoring and to prioritise action in relation to the importance of impacts and threats to marine ecosystems and its components.
Merila za dobro okoljsko stanje se morajo uporabljati ob upoštevanju potrebe po vzpostavitvi ciljne ocene stanja in monitoringa ter prednostnega ukrepanja v zvezi s pomembnimi vplivi in ogroženostjo morskih ekosistemov in njihovih sestavnih delov.
However, it is important that assessment considers the main cumulative and synergetic effects of impacts on the marine ecosystem, as mentioned in Article 8(1)(b)(ii) of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Vendar je pomembno, da se pri oceni upoštevajo glavni kumulativni in sinergijski učinki vplivov na morski ekosistem, kot je navedeno v členu 8(1)(b)(ii) Direktive 2008/56/ES.
In a number of cases, and in particular taking into account the relation between information needs and the geographical scope of the marine waters concerned, it can be appropriate to apply as a first step some selected criteria and related indicators for an overall screening of the environmental state at a broader scale and only then identify instances and specific areas where, having regard to the importance of impacts and threats in view of the environmental characteristics and/or human pressures, a finer assessment is necessary, involving all relevant indicators related to criteria.
V več primerih in zlasti ob upoštevanju povezave med potrebo po informacijami in geografskim obsegom zadevnih morskih voda je lahko primerno, da se kot prvi korak uporabijo nekatera izbrana merila in z njimi povezani kazalci za splošen pregled okoljskega stanja na širši ravni ter se šele nato opredelijo primeri in posebna območja, na katerih je ob upoštevanju pomena vplivov in ogroženosti glede na značilnosti okolja in/ali človekovega delovanja potrebna natančnejša presoja, vključno z uporabo vseh primernih kazalcev v zvezi z merili.
The temporal and spatial scale of impacts varies considerably depending on the type of pressure and the sensitivity of the ecosystem components affected.
Časovni in prostorski obseg vplivov se močno razlikuje glede na vrsto obremenitev in občutljivost sestavnih delov ekosistema, na katere te obremenitve delujejo.
Because of their intrinsic characteristics, some criteria and indicators may require applying various timescales for capturing a range of different processes.
Zaradi posebnih značilnosti nekaterih meril in kazalcev je morda treba uporabiti različne časovne razporede za zajetje širokega razpona različnih procesov.
When the assessment needs to start at a relatively small spatial scale to be ecologically meaningful (for instance because pressures are localised), it could be necessary to scale up assessments at broader scales, such as at the levels of subdivisions, sub-regions and regions.
Če je obseg presoje na začetku zaradi ekološke smiselnosti presoje (npr. zaradi prostorsko omejenih pritiskov) prostorsko majhen, je morda potrebno razviti tudi širšo presojo, na primer na ravni pododdelkov, podregij in regij.
A combined assessment of the scale, distribution and intensity of the pressures and the extent, vulnerability and resilience of the different ecosystem components including where possible their mapping, allows the identification of areas where marine ecosystems have or may have been adversely affected.
Na podlagi skupne ocene obsega, porazdelitve in intenzivnosti obremenitev ter velikosti, ranljivosti in odpornosti različnih sestavnih delov ekosistema, po možnosti pa tudi njihovega kartiranja, je mogoče določiti območja, ki bi jih ti škodljivi vplivi dejansko ali morebitno prizadeli.
It is also a useful basis to assess the scale of the actual or potential impacts marine ecosystems.
To je tudi uporabna podlaga za določanje obsega dejanskih ali potencialnih vplivov na morske ekosisteme.
This approach, which takes into account risk-based considerations, also supports the selection of the most appropriate indicators related to the criteria for assessment of progress towards good environmental status.
Na podlagi tega pristopa, ki upošteva premisleke na podlagi tveganja, je mogoče izbrati tudi najprimernejše kazalce v zvezi z merili za presojo napredka pri doseganju dobrega okoljskega stanja.
It also facilitates the development of specific tools that can support an ecosystem-based approach to the management of human activities required to achieve good environmental status through the identification of the sources of pressures and impacts, including their cumulative and synergetic effects.
Ta proces omogoča tudi razvoj posebnih orodij, ki lahko z ugotavljanjem virov obremenitev in vplivov, vključno z njihovimi kumulativnimi in sinergijskimi učinki, podpirajo ekosistemski pristop upravljanja človekovih dejavnosti, potreben za doseganje dobrega okoljskega stanja.
Such tools include spatial protection measures and measures in the list in Annex VI to Directive 2008/56/EC, notably spatial and temporal distribution controls, such as maritime spatial planning.
Ta orodja lahko vključujejo prostorske varovalne ukrepe in ukrepe s seznama iz Priloge VI k Direktivi 2008/56/ES, zlasti nadzore prostorske in časovne porazdelitve, kot to določa pomorsko prostorsko načrtovanje.
There is a diversity of environmental conditions at sea and of human activities having an impact on it.
Okoljske razmere na morju in človekove dejavnosti, ki vplivajo nanje, so zelo različne.
In particular, diversity exists between regions and even within marine regions, sub-regions and subdivisions.
Razlike obstajajo zlasti med regijami in celo znotraj morskih regij, podregij in pododdelkov.
For this reason, the applicability of specific indicators related to the criteria may require considering whether they are ecologically relevant to each situation being assessed.
Zato uporaba posebnih kazalcev v zvezi z merili lahko zahteva premislek, ali so ti kazalci ekološko pomembni za posamezne razmere, ki se presojajo.
Member States need to consider each of the criteria and related indicators listed in this Annex in order to identify those which are to be used to determine good environmental status.
Države članice morajo pri opredelitvi meril in z njimi povezanih kazalcev, ki jih je treba uporabiti za določitev dobrega okoljskega stanja, obravnavati vsa merila in z njimi povezane kazalce iz te priloge.
On the basis of the initial assessment, when a Member State considers that it is not appropriate to use one or more of the criteria, it needs to provide the Commission with a justification in the framework of the notification made pursuant to Article 9(2) of Directive 2008/56/EC, when relevant in relation to consistency and comparison between regions and sub-regions.
Na podlagi začetne presoje mora država članica, kadar meni, da ni primerno uporabiti enega ali več meril, predložiti Komisiji utemeljitev v okviru obvestila v skladu s členom 9(2) Direktive 2008/56/ES, po potrebi v povezavi z usklajenostjo in primerjavo med regijami in podregijami.
In this context, Member States are subject to the obligation of regional cooperation laid down in Articles 5 and 6 of Directive 2008/56/EC, and in particular to the requirement to ensure that the different elements of the marine strategies are coherent and coordinated across the marine region or sub-region concerned.
V zvezi s tem so države članice zavezane k obveznosti regionalnega sodelovanja iz členov 5 in 6 Direktive 2008/56/ES in zlasti k zagotavljanju, da so različni elementi morskih strategij usklajeni v zadevni morski regiji ali podregiji.
It is important that the application of the criteria takes into account the results of the initial assessment, required under Article 8 and Annex III to Directive 2008/56/EC, and that they are not carried out in isolation.
Pomembno je, da se za uporabo meril upoštevajo izsledki začetne presoje po členu 8 in Prilogi III k Direktivi 2008/56/ES ter da se ti izsledki ne izvajajo nepovezano.
The initial assessment is the main process for identifying the essential features and characteristics as well as the predominant pressures and impacts on the marine environment, subject to its regular updates and to monitoring programmes.
Začetna presoja je glavni način za določitev bistvenih oblik in značilnosti ter najpomembnejših pritiskov in vplivov na morsko okolje, ki se redno posodablja in spremlja.
This first assessment needs to be finalised by the date specified in Article 5(2) of Directive 2008/56/EC on the basis of the indicative lists of elements contained in Annex III to that Directive and taking account of existing data where available.
Ta začetna presoja mora biti končana do datuma iz člena 5(2) Direktive 2008/56/ES na podlagi okvirnih seznamov elementov iz Priloge III k navedeni direktivi in ob upoštevanju obstoječih podatkov, če so na voljo.
Consideration needs to be given to the fact that some criteria and related indicators are acknowledged as being still under development during this initial period.
Upoštevati je treba dejstvo, da se nekatera merila in z njimi povezani kazalci v tem začetnem obdobju še vedno razvijajo.
Progress towards good environmental status is taking place in the context of continuous broader changes in the marine environment.
Napredek pri doseganju dobrega okoljskega stanja poteka v okviru nenehnih večjih sprememb morskega okolja.
Climate change is already having an impact on the marine environment, including on ecosystem processes and functions.
Podnebne spremembe že vplivajo na morsko okolje, vključno s procesi in funkcijami ekosistemov.
In developing their respective marine strategies, Member States need to specify, where appropriate, any evidence of climate change impacts.
Države članice morajo pri razvoju svojih morskih strategij po potrebi navesti dokaze o vplivih podnebnih sprememb.
Adaptive management on the basis of the ecosystem-based approach includes the regular update of the determination of good environmental status.
Prilagodljivo upravljanje na podlagi ekosistemskega pristopa vključuje redno posodabljanje določitve dobrega okoljskega stanja.
Criteria for good environmental status relevant to the descriptors of Annex I to Directive 2008/56/EC
Merila za dobro okoljsko stanje v zvezi z deskriptorji iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2008/56/ES
The quality and occurrence of habitats and the distribution and abundance of species are in line with prevailing physiographic, geographic and climate conditions.
Kakovost in prisotnost habitatov ter razporeditev in številčnost vrst so v skladu s prevladujočimi fiziografskimi, geografskimi in podnebnimi pogoji.
Assessment is required at several ecological levels: ecosystems, habitats (including their associated communities, in the sense of biotopes) and species, which are reflected in the structure of this section, taking into account point 2 of Part A. For certain aspects of this descriptor, additional scientific and technical support is required [5].
Presojo je treba opraviti na več ekoloških ravneh: na ravni ekosistemov, habitatov (vključno z njimi povezanimi združbami na nivoju biotopov) in vrst, ki so upoštevane v strukturi tega dela ob upoštevanju točke 2 dela A. Za nekatere vidike tega deskriptorja je potrebna dodatna znanstvena in tehnična podpora [5].
To address the broad scope of the descriptor, it is necessary, having regard to Annex III to Directive 2008/56/EC, to prioritise among biodiversity features at the level of species, habitats and ecosystems.
Pri obravnavi širšega obsega deskriptorja je treba ob upoštevanju Priloge III k Direktivi 2008/56/ES določiti prioritete med elementi biotske raznovrstnosti (vrste, habitati in ekosistemi).
This enables the identification of those biodiversity features and those areas where impacts and threats arise and also supports the identification of appropriate indicators among the selected criteria, adequate to the areas and the features concerned [6].
To omogoča prepoznavanje tistih elementov in območij, kjer vplivi in grožnje nastajajo, poleg tega pa podpira opredelitev ustreznih kazalcev med izbranimi merili, primernimi za zadevna območja in elemente biotske raznovrstnosti [6].
The obligation of regional cooperation contained in Articles 5 and 6 of Directive 2008/56/EC is directly relevant to the process of selection of biodiversity features within regions, sub-regions and subdivisions, including for the establishment, where appropriate, of reference conditions pursuant to Annex IV to Directive 2008/56/EC.
Obveznost regionalnega sodelovanja iz členov 5 in 6 Direktive 2008/56/ES je neposredno povezana z izbiro elementov biotske raznovrstnosti znotraj regij, podregij in pododdelkov, kjer je mogoče, pa tudi z vzpostavitvijo referenčnih razmer v skladu s Prilogo IV k Direktivi 2008/56/ES.
Modelling using a geographic information system platform may provide a useful basis for mapping a range of biodiversity features and human activities and their pressures, provided that any errors involved are properly assessed and described when applying the results.
Modeliranje z uporabo platforme geografskega informacijskega sistema je lahko uporabna podlaga za določanje območja razširjenosti elementov biotske raznovrstnosti ter človekovih dejavnosti in pritiskov zaradi teh dejavnosti, ob upoštevanju, da se vse mogoče zajete napake ustrezno ocenijo in opišejo ob uporabi rezultatov.
This type of data is a prerequisite for ecosystem-based management of human activities and for developing related spatial tools [7].
Ti podatki so pogoj za ekosistemsko upravljanje človekovih dejavnosti in za razvoj s tem povezanih prostorskih orodij [7].
Species level
Raven vrst
For each region, sub-region or subdivision, taking into account the different species and communities (e.g. for phytoplankton and zooplankton) contained in the indicative list in Table 1 of Annex III to Directive 2008/56/EC, it is necessary to draw up a set of relevant species and functional groups, having regard to point 2 of Part A. The three criteria for the assessment of any species are species distribution, population size and population condition.
Za posamezno regijo, podregijo ali pododdelek je treba ob upoštevanju različnih vrst in združb (npr. za fitoplankton in zooplankton) z okvirnega seznama iz tabele 1 Priloge III k Direktivi 2008/56/ES sestaviti seznam ustreznih vrst in funkcionalnih skupin ob upoštevanju točke 2 iz dela A. Stanje populacije v nekaterih primerih vključuje tudi poznavanje vitalnosti populacije ter odnosov med vrstami in znotraj vrste.
The assessment of species also requires an integrated understanding of the distribution, extent and condition of their habitats, coherent with the requirements laid down in Directive 92/43/EEC [8] and Directive 2009/147/EC, to make sure that there is a sufficiently large habitat to maintain its population, taking into consideration any threat of deterioration or loss of such habitats.
Pri oceni stanja vrst je treba prav tako celostno razumeti porazdelitev, velikost in stanje njihovih habitatov v skladu z zahtevami iz Direktive 92/43/EGS [8] in Direktive 2009/147/ES, da se zagotovi, da je habitat dovolj velik za ohranitev populacije, ob upoštevanju vseh nevarnosti za poslabšanje stanja ali izginjanje teh habitatov.
Distributional range (1.1.1)
Območje razširjenosti (1.1.1.)
Distributional pattern within the latter, where appropriate (1.1.2)
Vzorec razširjenosti znotraj območja razširjenosti, kadar je to potrebno (1.1.2)
Area covered by the species (for sessile/benthic species) (1.1.3)
Območje, ki ga pokrivajo vrste (za pritrjene/bentoške vrste) (1.1.3)
Population size
Velikost populacije
Population abundance and/or biomass, as appropriate (1.2.1)
Številčnost in/ali biomasa populacije, če je to primerno (1.2.1)
Population condition
Stanje populacije
Population demographic characteristics (e.g. body size or age class structure, sex ratio, fecundity rates, survival/mortality rates) (1.3.1)
Demografske značilnosti populacije (npr. velikostna ali starostna struktura, razmerje med spoloma, rodnost, stopnja preživetja/umrljivosti) (1.3.1)
Population genetic structure, where appropriate (1.3.2).
Genetska struktura populacije, kadar je to potrebno (1.3.2).
Habitat level
Raven habitatov
For the purpose of Directive 2008/56/EC, the term habitat addresses both the abiotic characteristics and the associated biological community, treating both elements together in the sense of the term biotope.
V Direktivi 2008/56/ES izraz habitat zajema abiotske značilnosti in pripadajočo biološko združbo, pri čemer sta oba elementa obravnavana skupaj z izrazom biotop.
A set of habitat types needs to be drawn up for each region, sub-region or subdivision, taking into account the different habitats contained in the indicative list in Table 1 of Annex III and having regard to the instruments mentioned in point 2 of Part A. Such instruments also refer to a number of habitat complexes (which means assessing, where appropriate, the composition, extent and relative proportions of habitats within such complexes) and to functional habitats (such as spawning, breeding and feeding areas and migration routes).
Določiti je potrebno seznam habitatnih tipov za vsako posamezno regijo, podregijo ali pododdelek ob upoštevanju različnih habitatov z okvirnega seznama iz tabele 1 v Prilogi III in instrumentov iz točke 2 dela A. Ti instrumenti se sklicujejo tudi na več habitatnih kompleksov (kar pomeni, da je treba po potrebi presoditi sestavo, velikost in sorazmerni delež habitatov v takih kompleksih) in na funkcionalne habitate (kot so območja drstenja, vzreje in hranjenja ter migracijske poti).
Additional efforts for a coherent classification of marine habitats, supported by adequate mapping, are essential for assessment at habitat level, taking also into account variations along the gradient of distance from the coast and depth (e.g. coastal, shelf and deep sea).
Dodatna prizadevanja za skladno razvrstitev morskih habitatov na podlagi kartiranja so bistvena za presojo na ravni habitatov, pri čemer se upoštevajo tudi razlike v naklonu vzdolž obale, razdalji od obale in globini (npr. obalno, šelfno in globoko morje).
The three criteria for the assessment of habitats are their distribution, extent and condition (for the latter, in particular the condition of typical species and communities), accompanied with the indicators related respectively to them.
Tri merila za presojo habitatov so njihova porazdelitev, velikost in stanje (zlasti stanje tipičnih vrst in združb) ter ustrezni indikatorji zanje.
The assessment of habitat condition requires an integrated understanding of the status of associated communities and species, coherent with the requirements laid down in Directive 92/43/EEC [9] and Directive 2009/147/EC, including where appropriate an assessment of their functional traits.
Pri presoji stanja habitatov je treba celostno razumeti stanje z njimi povezanih združb in vrst v skladu z zahtevami iz Direktive 92/43/EGS [9] in Direktive 2009/147/ES, po potrebi vključno s presojo njihovih funkcionalnih značilnosti.
Habitat distribution
Razširjenost habitatov
Distributional range (1.4.1)
Območje razširjenosti (1.4.1)
Distributional pattern (1.4.2)
Vzorec razširjenosti (1.4.2)
Habitat extent
Velikost habitatov
Habitat area (1.5.1)
Površina habitatov (1.5.1)
Habitat volume, where relevant (1.5.2)
Volumen habitatov, kadar je to ustrezno (1.5.2)
Habitat condition
Stanje habitatov
Condition of the typical species and communities (1.6.1)
Stanje tipičnih vrst in združb (1.6.1)
Relative abundance and/or biomass, as appropriate (1.6.2)
Relativna številčnost in/ali biomasa populacije, če je to primerno (1.6.2)
Physical, hydrological and chemical conditions (1.6.3).
Fizikalne, hidrološke in kemijske razmere (1.6.3).
Ecosystem level
Raven ekosistemov
Ecosystem structure
Struktura ekosistemov
Composition and relative proportions of ecosystem components (habitats and species) (1.7.1).
Sestava in sorazmerni deleži sestavnih delov ekosistemov (habitati in vrste) (1.7.1).
In addition, the interactions between the structural components of the ecosystem are fundamental for assessing ecosystem processes and functions for the purpose of the overall determination of good environmental status, having regard, inter alia, to Articles 1, 3(5) and 9(1) of Directive 2008/56/EC.
Poleg tega je medsebojni vpliv med strukturnimi sestavnimi deli ekosistema bistvenega pomena za presojo procesov in funkcij ekosistemov za namen splošne opredelitve dobrega okoljskega stanja, med drugim ob upoštevanju členov 1, 3(5) in 9(1) Direktive 2008/56/ES.
Other functional aspects addressed through other descriptors of good environmental status (such as descriptors 4 and 6), as well as connectivity and resilience considerations, are also important for addressing ecosystem processes and functions.
Drugi funkcionalni vidiki, obravnavani v okviru ostalih deskriptorjev dobrega okoljskega stanja (kot sta deskriptorja 4 in 6), ter pomisleki v zvezi s povezljivostjo in prožnostjo, so prav tako pomembni pri obravnavi procesov in funkcij ekosistemov.