natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Firstly, no evidence was submitted with regard to the claim that the moisture content of the paper may render test results for ISO test standard ISO 3783:2006 unreliable.
Prvič, za trditev, da lahko z vsebnostjo vlage v papirju dobimo nezanesljive preskusne rezultate za standard preskusa ISO 3783:2006, ni predložila nobenega dokaza.
Secondly, as far as the testing of samples of CFP for web-fed printing is concerned, such tests were not made by an independent expert and the reliability and objectivity of such tests were therefore considered insufficient to base any conclusions thereon.
Drugič, kar zadeva preskušanje vzorcev PFP za rotacijsko tiskanje, takih preskusov ni opravil neodvisni strokovnjak, zato se zanesljivost in objektivnost takih preskusov ne štejeta kot zadostna, da bi na njih utemeljevali kakršne koli sklepne ugotovitve.
Therefore, the resistance to picking was provisionally found to be a reliable technical characteristic to distinguish between CFP used in web-fed and the one used in sheet-fed printing.
Zato je bilo začasno ugotovljeno, da je odpornost proti trganju zanesljiva tehnična lastnost za razlikovanje med PFP, ki se uporablja za rotacijsko tiskanje, in tistim, ki se uporablja za formatno tiskanje.
During the course of the investigation, certain parties also claimed that multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard (as defined in the next recital) should be excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Med preiskavo so nekatere strani trdile tudi, da bi bilo treba iz obsega preiskave izključiti večplastni papir in večplastni karton (kot sta opredeljena v naslednji uvodni izjavi).
They claimed that multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard had different physical characteristics such as multiple plies, higher stiffness and lower density and that the final use of these products was different as these are usually used for folding carton and packaging applications.
Trdile so, da imata večplastni papir in večplastni karton drugačne fizikalne lastnosti, na primer več slojev, večjo trdoto in manjšo gostoto, ter da je končna uporaba teh izdelkov drugačna kot uporaba izdelkov, ki se navadno uporabljajo za kartonske zloženke in embalažo.
These parties finally claimed that single-ply and multi-ply paper and paperboard would be easily distinguished by their physical appearance.
Te strani so nazadnje trdile, da je mogoče enoplastni in večplastni papir in karton zlahka ločiti po zunanjem videzu.
Multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard, as defined in the Harmonised System Explanatory Notes to subheading 4805, are products obtained by pressing together two or more layers of moist pulps of which at least one characteristics different from the others.
Večplastni papir in večplastni karton, kot sta opredeljena v pojasnjevalnih opombah harmoniziranega sistema k tarifni podštevilki 4805, sta izdelka, dobljena s stiskanjem dveh ali več plasti vlažne papirne kaše, od katerih je vsaj ena lastnost drugačna od drugih.
These differences may arise from the nature of pulps used (e.g. recycled waste), the method of production (e.g. mechanical or chemical) or, if the pulps are of the same nature and have been produced by the same method, the degree of processing (e.g. unbleached, bleached or coloured).
Te razlike lahko izhajajo iz vrste uporabljene papirne kaše (npr. reciklirani odpadki), metode proizvodnje (npr. mehanična ali kemična) ali, pri kašah iste vrste, ki so izdelane po isti metodi, iz stopnje obdelave (npr. nebeljena, beljena ali barvana).
The investigation showed that multi-ply paper and paperboard has indeed some different physical and technical characteristics; more specifically it has several layers of pulp giving it an increased rigidity.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imata večplastni papir in karton res nekaj drugačnih fizikalnih in tehničnih lastnosti; konkretneje, imata več plasti kaše, kar jima daje večjo togost.
Multi-ply paper and paperboard is produced by a different production method requiring a different paper machine than the one used for the production of CFP, as in the production process several layers of pulp are layered into a single product.
Večplastni papir in karton se proizvajata z drugačno proizvodno metodo, ki zahteva drugačne papirniške stroje kot metoda, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo PFP, saj se v proizvodnem procesu več plasti kaše stisne v enoten izdelek.
Finally, multi-ply paper and paperboard serves different purposes (mainly packaging) compared to CFP that is used for high quality printing of promotional material, magazines, etc. Multi-ply paper and paperboard as defined in recital 24 is therefore provisionally considered as not being the product concerned.
Nazadnje, večplastni papir in karton se uporabljata za drugačne namene (v glavnem za embalažo) kot PFP, ki se uporablja za visokokakovostno tiskanje promocijskega gradiva, revij itd. Večplastni papir in karton, kot sta opredeljena v uvodni izjavi (24), se zato začasno ne štejeta za zadevni izdelek.
Consequently, the CN codes mentioned covering imports of multi-ply paper and multi-ply paperboard are provisionally excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Posledično se navedene oznake KN, ki pokrivajo uvoz večplastnega papirja in večplastnega kartona, začasno izločijo iz obsega preiskave.
Finally, one Chinese producer claimed that so called ‘paperboard’ should be excluded from the scope of the investigation as it does not fall under the definition of fine paper (whether coated or not) because of alleged differences in its weight, thickness and rigidity.
Nazadnje, en kitajski proizvajalec je trdil, da bi bilo treba tako imenovani „karton“ izključiti iz obsega preiskave, ker ne spada v opredelitev finega papirja (premazanega ali ne) zaradi domnevnih razlik v masi, debelini in togosti.
It was found that the term ‘paperboard’ is generally used for paper with high substances making the paper in general heavier, i.e. ‘paperboard’ is commonly defined as paper with a basis weight of above 224 g/m2.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se izraz „karton“ na splošno uporablja za papir z visoko vsebnostjo snovi, zaradi katerih je papir na splošno težji, in da je „karton“ navadno opredeljen kot papir z osnovno maso nad 224 g/m2.
However, the investigation revealed that the difference in weight does not have a significant impact on the remaining physical and technical characteristic and end uses which would it make distinguishable from the product concerned.
Preiskava je razkrila, da razlika v masi ne vpliva pomembno na preostale fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter končno uporabo, zaradi katerih bi se razlikoval od zadevnega izdelka.
It is also noted that, as outlined in recital 14, all CFP with a weight of 70 g/m2 or more but not exceeding 400 g/m2 were explicitly included in the definition of the product concerned.
Ugotovljeno je tudi, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 14, da so bili vsi PFP z maso med 70 g/m2 in 400 g/m2 izrecno vključeni v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
Therefore paperboard is provisionally considered as being the product concerned.
Zato se karton začasno šteje za zadevni izdelek.
The product concerned, the product produced and sold on the domestic market of the PRC, and on the domestic market of USA, which served provisionally as the analogue country, as well as the product manufactured and sold in the Union by the Union producers were found to have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses.
Za zadevni izdelek, izdelek, proizveden in prodan na domačem trgu LRK ter na domačem trgu ZDA, ki so bile začasno uporabljene kot primerljiva država, ter za izdelek, ki ga proizvajalci Unije proizvedejo in prodajo v Uniji, je bilo ugotovljeno, da imata enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter osnovno uporabo.
They are therefore provisionally considered as alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno obravnavata kot podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Only two exporting producers groups in the PRC came forward and replied to the request for sampling data in the Notice of initiation.
V LRK sta se odzvali na zahtevo po vzorčenju podatkov v obvestilu o začetku postopka samo dve skupini proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
One group (Chenming) represents 2 related exporting producers while the other group (APP) represents 4 related exporting producers.
Ena skupina (Chenming) zastopa dva povezana proizvajalca izvoznika, druga skupina (APP) pa štiri povezane proizvajalce izvoznike.
The cooperating exporting producers represent the total exports of the product concerned from the PRC to the Union.
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki pomenijo celoten izvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Unijo.
In view of the potentially large number of Union producers sampling was envisaged in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na mogoče veliko število proizvajalcev Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku postopka predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, after examination of the information submitted and given that only four Union producers came forward within the deadlines set in the Notice of initiation, it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
Vendar je bilo po proučitvi predloženih informacij in glede na to, da so se v rokih iz obvestila o začetku postopka odzvali samo štirje proizvajalci Unije, odločeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
The four cooperating producers were considered to be representative (covering 61 % of total production) of the Union industry as defined in recital 77 below.
Štirje sodelujoči proizvajalci (ki so pokrivali 61 % skupne proizvodnje) so se šteli kot reprezentativni za industrijo Unije, kot je opredeljena v uvodni izjavi 77 spodaj.
The information provided by the cooperating companies was verified on-spot and was used for the micro indicators as explained in recital 90.
Informacije, ki so jih predložile sodelujoče družbe, so bile preverjene na kraju samem in so se uporabile kot mikrokazalniki, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi 90.
In view of the potentially large number of importers, sampling was envisaged for importers in the Notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na mogoče veliko število uvoznikov je bilo v obvestilu o začetku postopka predvideno vzorčenje za uvoznike v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, after examination of the information submitted and given the low number of importers which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
Vendar je bilo po proučitvi predloženih informacij in glede na majhno število uvoznikov, ki so pokazali pripravljenost za sodelovanje, odločeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
The general methodology set out below has been applied to the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC.
Spodaj opredeljena splošna metodologija je bila uporabljena pri sodelujočih proizvajalcih izvoznikih v LRK.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those exporting producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se normalna vrednost v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK določi v skladu z odstavki od 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions, without significant state interference, and costs reflect market values;
poslovne odločitve in stroški se oblikujejo v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, brez večjega vmešavanja države, pri čemer stroški izražajo tržne vrednosti;
firms have one clear set of accounting records which are independently audited, in line with international accounting standards (IAS) and applied for all purposes;
družbe imajo jasno določeno zbirko računovodskih evidenc, ki se pregledujejo neodvisno, v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MRS) in uporabljajo v vse namene;
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system;
ni bistvenih izkrivljanj, ki se prenašajo še iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva;
Only one exporting producers group (i.e. APP) in the PRC requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Samo ena skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov (to je APP) v LRK je zahtevala TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
The party submitted 33 MET claim forms referring to its four related exporting producers and a series of other related companies involved in the product concerned i.e. pulp mills, chemical companies, forestry companies (upstream producers) and domestic trading companies.
Predložila je 33 obrazcev zahtevka za TGO, ki se nanašajo na njene štiri povezane proizvajalce izvoznike in vrsto drugih povezanih družb, ki se ukvarjajo z zadevnim izdelkom, to je obrate za proizvodnjo celuloze, kemične družbe, gozdarske družbe (proizvajalce na zgornjem delu oskrbne verige) in domače trgovske družbe.
Account taken of the high number of MET claims, it was considered appropriate, for the purpose of the preliminary investigation, to limit the on-spot verification visits to the four exporting producers of the group.
Ob upoštevanju velikega števila zahtevkov za TGO se je zdelo primerno, da se za potrebe predhodne preiskave preveritveni obiski na kraju samem omejijo na štiri proizvajalce izvoznike v skupini.
The Commission sought all the information deemed necessary and verified all the information submitted in the MET claims at the premises of the four related exporting producers.
Komisija je poiskala vse potrebne informacije in preverila vse informacije iz zahtevka za TGO v prostorih štirih povezanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
It was considered that MET should not be granted because none of them met the first, second and third criteria as laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da se TGO ne odobri, ker nobeden od njih ni izpolnjeval prvega, drugega in tretjega merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
As far as criterion 1 is concerned, discrepancies with respect to business decisions and costs were established.
Glede merila 1 so bila ugotovljena izkrivljanja v zvezi s poslovnimi odločitvami in stroški.
It was found that on numerous occasions there was no evidence on payments made for the transfer of companies’ shares.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da v številnih primerih ni bilo dokazov o plačilih, ki so bila izvedena za prenos deležev družb.
Furthermore contributions either from state-owned shareholders or related parties in fixed assets, land and expenditures converted into shares were not independently evaluated.
Poleg tega prispevki delničarjev v državni lasti ali prispevki povezanih strani v osnovna sredstva, zemljišča in odhodke, ki so bili spremenjeni v deleže, niso bili neodvisno ocenjeni.
Finally in one case shares passed from one state-owned shareholder to one of the APP group companies at non-market price.
V enem primeru so deleži prešli od delničarja v državni lasti na družbo iz skupine APP po netržni ceni.
With respect to costs, the investigation established that, account taken of the methodology used by the group to record raw material inputs, there is lack of evidence on the cost of major raw material inputs.
V zvezi s stroški je bilo ob upoštevanju metodologije, ki jo je skupina uporabljala za evidenco vhodnih surovin, v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da ni dokazov o stroških glavnih vhodnih surovin.
Consequently, it was concluded that the four related exporting producers have not shown that they fulfil criterion 1.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da štirje povezani proizvajalci izvozniki niso dokazali izpolnjevanja merila 1.
With respect to criterion 2, it was established that fundamental International Accounting Standards (IAS) principles and in particular IAS 1 were disregarded (i.e. accrual principle, off-setting, lack of prudence and fair representation of transactions) both in the accounts and in their audit, which put into question the reliability of the companies’ accounts.
Glede merila 2 je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bila v izkazih in njihovi reviziji zanemarjena temeljna načela Mednarodnih računovodskih standardov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MRS) in zlasti MRS 1 (tj. obračunsko načelo, pobotanje, previdnost in pošteno prikazovanje transakcij), zato je bila torej zanesljivost izkazov družb dvomljiva.
Consequently, it was concluded that the four related exporting producers have not shown that they fulfil criterion 2.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da štirje povezani proizvajalci izvozniki niso dokazali izpolnjevanja merila 2.
As far as criterion 3 is concerned, the investigation revealed the existence of significant distortions with respect to land use rights (LUR) relevant to the four related exporting producers.
Glede merila 3 je preiskava razkrila obstoj znatnih izkrivljanj v zvezi s pravicami do uporabe zemljišč, ki se nanašajo na štiri povezane proizvajalce izvoznike.
Such distortions point to the conclusion that the LUR are not granted and maintained in accordance with market economy conditions.
Taka izkrivljanja vodijo k sklepu, da se pravice do uporabe zemljišč ne odobrijo in ne vzdržujejo v skladu s pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
It was also established on spot that significant distortions exist in loan attribution to the four related exporting producers from the Chinese banking/financial sector.
Na kraju samem je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da obstajajo znatna izkrivljanja pri odobritvi posojil kitajskega bančnega/finančnega sektorja štirim povezanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
Most of the loans were given by banks with significant shareholding by the State while clear indications exist that general state industrial policies were taken into consideration by financial institutions when establishing the group’s creditworthiness which resulted in providing loans to companies that were in a bad financial situation.
Večino posojil so dale banke z znatnim državnim lastniškim deležem, čeprav obstajajo jasni znaki, da so finančne institucije pri ugotavljanju kreditne sposobnosti skupine upoštevale splošne industrijske politike države, zaradi česar so bila družbam s slabim finančnim stanjem odobrena posojila.
Account taken of all the above, it was consequently concluded that the four related exporting producers have not shown that they fulfil criterion 3.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bilo zato sklenjeno, da štirje povezani proizvajalci izvozniki niso dokazali izpolnjevanja merila 3.
APP and the Union producers were given the opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Skupina APP in proizvajalci Unije so dobili možnost, da predložijo pripombe k zgoraj navedenim ugotovitvam.
The Union producers agreed with the above findings.
Proizvajalci Unije so soglašali z zgornjimi ugotovitvami.
They also disputed arguments made by the Chinese exporting group as to being granted MET because the Commission is simultaneously conducting an anti-subsidy investigation.
Poleg tega so nasprotovali trditvam kitajske skupine izvoznikov, da bi jim bilo treba odobriti TGO, ker je Komisija hkrati izvajala protisubvencijsko preiskavo.
The Chinese exporting group did not agree with the above findings.
Kitajska skupina izvoznikov se ni strinjala z zgornjimi ugotovitvami.
With respect to Criterion 1, it was submitted that share transfers of the group’s companies and payments made thereon are irrelevant for this criterion as the criterion requires companies to take business decisions in response to market signals.
Glede merila 1 je navedla, da so prenosi deležev družb v skupini in plačila, izvedena v zvezi s tem, nepomembni za to merilo, kajti to zahteva od družb, da poslovne odločitve sprejemajo kot odziv na tržne signale.
In this respect it is noted that the deficiencies identified in the MET assessment (i.e. lack of evidence on payments on share transfers, unreasonably low amounts paid to state-owned shareholders for share transfers, no independent evaluation of contributed assets) do have an impact on business decisions.
V tem smislu se opozarja, da pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene pri oceni TGO (torej pomanjkanje dokazov o plačilih za prenose deležev, nerazumno nizki zneski, plačani delničarjem v državni lasti za prenose deležev, prispevana sredstva niso bila neodvisno ovrednotena), resnično vplivajo na poslovne odločitve.
Indeed, the fact that a company can avoid payments on share transfers, use under/over evaluated assets in its share capital and perform with state-owned companies share transfers that do not have an economic explanation or justification, has a direct impact on its financial position and its ability to take decisions in response to market signals.
Dejstvo, da se lahko družba izogne plačilu za prenos deležev, da v svojem osnovnem kapitalu uporabi podcenjena/precenjena sredstva in z družbami v državni lasti izvaja prenose deležev, za katere ni ekonomske razlage ali utemeljitve, v resnici neposredno vpliva na njeno finančno stanje in sposobnost, da sprejema odločitve kot odziv na tržne signale.
With respect to raw materials it was argued that the Commission should have investigated whether the purchases of inputs made by the Chinese group’s upstream raw material suppliers were made at market values.
V zvezi s surovinami je trdila, da bi morala Komisija preiskati, ali so bili nakupi vložkov, ki so jih opravili dobavitelji surovin za kitajsko skupino, izvedeni po tržnih vrednostih.
It was also submitted that the Commission’s findings are incorrect.
Navedla je tudi, da so ugotovitve Komisije nepravilne.
In this respect it is noted that the investigation established it is practically impossible to trace back what the group pays for any type of raw material procurements.
V tem smislu se opozarja, da je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da je praktično nemogoče izslediti, koliko skupina plača za nabavo katere koli vrste surovin.
With respect to Criterion 2 it was argued that the Chinese accounting standards (GAAP) have been recognised by the EU as being equivalent to the IFRS/IAS.
V zvezi z merilom 2 je trdila, da je EU priznala kitajske računovodske standarde (splošno sprejeta računovodska načela) kot enakovredne MSRP/MRS.
In this respect it is noted that the MET assessment is carried out in line with IAS and not the Chinese accounting standards.
V tem smislu je treba opozoriti, da je ocena TGO opravljena v skladu z MRS, ne v skladu s kitajskimi računovodskimi standardi.
In any event, and in particular in view of the claimed equivalence between the two sets of standards, it would have been normal to expect that the deficiencies found in this respect should have been highlighted by the auditor.
Kakor koli in zlasti glede na trditve o enakovrednosti obeh zbirk standardov bi bilo normalno pričakovati, da bi revizor opozoril na pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene v tem pogledu.
APP disputed that its companies breach the elements of the IAS rules mentioned in the MET assessment (accrual principle, faithful representation of transactions principle and offsetting).
Skupina APP je zanikala, da bi njene družbe kršile elemente pravil MRS, navedene v oceni TGO (obračunsko načelo, načelo poštenega prikazovanja transakcij in pobotanje).
Nevertheless the comments provided did not undermine the findings of the investigation.
Kljub temu pa predložene pripombe niso spodkopale ugotovitev preiskave.
With respect to Criterion 3 and in particular to the LUR it was argued that this criterion refers to significant distortions carried over from the non-market system and not to state intervention of a sort that is common in market economy countries.
V zvezi z merilom 3 in zlasti v zvezi s pravicami do uporabe zemljišč je trdila, da se to merilo nanaša na znatna izkrivljanja, ki so prenesena iz netržnega sistema, ne pa na takšno vmešavanje države, ki je običajno v državah s tržnim gospodarstvom.