natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 6 of Section C of Annex I, by not reviewing the relevant work of a rating analyst over two years preceding his or her departure, where the rating analyst terminates his or her employment and joins a rated entity which he or she has been involved in rating or a financial firm, with which he or she has had dealings as part of his or her duties at the credit rating agency.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v povezavi s točko 6 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne pregleda vsega ustreznega dela bonitetnega analitika, opravljenega v zadnjih dveh letih pred njegovim odhodom, kadar bonitetni analitik prekine svoje delovno razmerje in se pridruži ocenjevanemu subjektu, v katerega bonitetno ocenjevanje je bil vključen, ali finančnemu podjetju, s katerim je imel opravka v okviru svojih dolžnosti pri bonitetni agenciji.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 1 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in that point does not buy, sell or engage in a transaction in any financial instrument referred to in that point.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v zvezi s točko 1 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da osebe iz zadevne točke ne kupi, proda ali opravi transakcije s finančnim instrumentom iz te točke.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 2 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not participate in or otherwise influence the determination of a credit rating as set out in point 2 of that Section.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v zvezi s točko 2 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točke 1 navedenega oddelka ne sodeluje pri določanju ali drugače vpliva na določanje bonitetne ocene, kakor je določeno v točki 2 navedenega oddelka.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with points (b), (c) and (d) of point 3 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not disclose or use or share information, as referred to in those points.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v zvezi s točkami 3(b), (c) in (d) oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točke 1 navedenega oddelka ne razkrije, uporablja ali ne daje informacij, kakor so opredeljene v teh točkah.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 4 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not solicit or accept money, gifts or favours from anyone with whom the credit rating agency does business.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v zvezi s točko 4 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točke 1 navedenega oddelka ne zahteva ali sprejema denarja, daril ali uslug od katere koli osebe, s katero bonitetna agencija posluje.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(3), in conjunction with point 7 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in point 1 of that Section does not take up a key management position with the rated entity or its related third party within six months of the credit rating.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(3) v zvezi s točko 7 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točke 1 navedenega oddelka ne sprejme ključnega vodstvenega delovnega mesta pri ocenjevanem subjektu ali s slednjim povezani tretji osebi, dokler ne preteče šest mesecev od izdelave bonitetne ocene.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (a) of the first paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that the lead rating analyst is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or its related third parties for a period exceeding four years.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(4) v zvezi s točko (a) prvega odstavka točke 8 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da glavni bonitetni analitiki niso vključeni v dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so povezane z istim ocenjevanim subjektom ali njegovimi povezanimi tretjimi osebami, dlje kot štiri leta.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (b) of the first paragraph of point 8 Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a rating analyst is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or its related third parties for a period exceeding five years.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(4) v zvezi s točko (b) prvega odstavka točke 8 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da bonitetni analitiki niso vključeni v dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so povezane z istim ocenjevanim subjektom ali njegovimi povezanimi tretjimi osebami, dlje kot pet let.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with point (c) of the first paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person approving credit ratings is not involved in credit rating activities related to the same rated entity or its related third parties for a period exceeding seven years.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(4) v zvezi s točko (c) prvega odstavka točke 8 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba, ki odobri bonitetne ocene, ni vključena v dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so povezane z istim ocenjevanim subjektom ali njegovimi povezanimi tretjimi osebami, dlje kot sedem let.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(4), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 8 of Section C of Annex I, by not ensuring that a person referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of the first paragraph of that point is not involved in credit rating activities related to the rated entity or related third parties referred to in those points within two years of the end of the periods set out in those points.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(4) v zvezi z drugim odstavkom točke 8 oddelka C Priloge I, če ne zagotovi, da oseba iz točk (a), (b) in (c) prvega odstavka točke 8 ni vključena v dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so povezane z ocenjevanim subjektom ali povezanimi tretjimi osebami, navedenimi v teh točkah v dveh letih po koncu obdobij, določenih v navedenih točkah.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 7(5) by introducing compensation or performance evaluation contingent on the amount of revenue that the credit rating agency derives from the rated entities or related third parties.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 7(5), če uvede ureditev plačil ali ocene uspešnosti glede na znesek prihodka, ki ga bonitetna agencija dobi od ocenjevanega subjekta ali njegovih povezanih tretjih oseb.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(2) by not adopting, implementing or enforcing adequate measures to ensure that the credit ratings it issues are based on a thorough analysis of all the information that is available to it and that is relevant to its analysis according to its rating methodologies.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8(2) če ne sprejme, izvaja ali izvršuje ustreznih ukrepov za zagotovitev, da bonitetne ocene, ki jih izdaja, temeljijo na poglobljeni analizi vseh informacij, ki so ji na voljo in so pomembne za njeno analizo glede na njene metodologije bonitetnega ocenjevanja.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(3) by not using rating methodologies that are rigorous, systematic, continuous and subject to validation based on historical experience, including back-testing.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8(3), če ne uporablja metodologij bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki so rigorozne, sistematične in ustaljene ter jih je mogoče ovrednotiti na podlagi preteklih izkušenj, vključno s testiranjem za nazaj.
The credit rating agency infringes the first subparagraph of Article 8(4) by refusing to issue a credit rating of an entity or a financial instrument because a portion of the entity or the financial instrument had been previously rated by another credit rating agency.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši prvi pododstavek člena 8(4), če zavrne izdajo bonitetne ocene o subjektu ali finančnem instrumentu z utemeljitvijo, da je del tega subjekta ali finančnega instrumenta predhodno že ocenila druga bonitetna agencija.
The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 8(4) by not recording all instances where in its credit rating process it departs from existing credit ratings prepared by another credit rating agency with respect to underlying assets or structured finance instruments or by not providing a justification for the differing assessment.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši drugi pododstavek člena 8(4), če ne evidentira vseh primerov, kjer v svojem postopku bonitetnega ocenjevanja odstopa od obstoječih bonitetnih ocen, ki jih je v zvezi z zadevnimi osnovnimi ali strukturiranimi finančnimi produkti izdelala druga bonitetna agencija, ali ne utemelji odstopajoče ocene.
The credit rating agency infringes the first sentence of Article 8(5) by not monitoring its credit ratings or by not reviewing its credit ratings or methodologies on an ongoing basis and at least annually.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši prvi stavek člena 8(5), če svojih bonitetnih ocen ne spremlja ali svojih bonitetnih ocen ali metod ne pregleduje stalno in najmanj enkrat letno.
The credit rating agency infringes the second sentence of Article 8(5) by not establishing internal arrangements to monitor the impact of changes in macroeconomic or financial market conditions on credit ratings.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši drugi stavek člena 8(5), če ne določi notranjih postopkov za spremljanje učinka, ki ga imajo spremembe makroekonomskih razmer ali razmer na finančnih trgih na bonitetne ocene.
The credit rating agency infringes point (b) of Article 8(6), where methodologies, models or key rating assumptions used in credit rating activities are changed, by not reviewing the affected credit ratings in accordance with that point, or by not placing those ratings under observation in the meantime.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (b) člena 8(6), kadar so metodologije, modeli ali ključne predpostavke, uporabljene pri dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja spremenjeni, vendar se ne pregleda zadevne bonitetne ocene v skladu z navedeno točko ali se teh ocen v vmesnem času ne poda v opazovanje.
The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 8(6) by not re-rating a credit rating that has been based on methodologies, models or key rating assumptions that are changed where the overall combined effect of those changes affects that credit rating.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (c) člena 8(6), če ne izvede ponovnega ocenjevanja bonitetne ocene, izdelane na podlagi metod, modelov ali bistvenih predpostavk bonitetnega ocenjevanja, na podlagi spremenjenih metod, če skupni učinek teh sprememb vpliva na zadevne bonitetne ocene.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 9 by undertaking the outsourcing of important operational functions in such a way as to impair materially the quality of the credit rating agency's internal control or the ability of ESMA to supervise the credit rating agency's compliance with obligations under this Regulation.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 9, če odda pomembne operativne funkcije v zunanje izvajanje tako, da se bistveno poslabša kakovost notranjih kontrol bonitetne agencije ali zmožnost ESMA, da nadzira, kako bonitetna agencija izpolnjuje svoje obveznosti v skladu s to uredbo.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with the second paragraph of point 4 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, by issuing a credit rating or not withdrawing an existing rating in a case where the lack of reliable data or the complexity of the structure of a new type of financial instrument or the quality of information available is not satisfactory or raises serious questions as to whether the credit rating agency can provide a credible credit rating.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(2) v zvezi z drugim odstavkom točke 4 dela I oddelka D Priloge I, če izda bonitetno oceno ali ne prekliče obstoječe bonitetne ocene v primeru pomanjkanja zanesljivih podatkov ali zapletenosti strukture nove vrste finančnega instrumenta ali nezadovoljive kakovosti razpoložljivih informacij ali če se zaradi njih pojavijo resni dvomi o tem, ali lahko bonitetna agencija zagotovi verodostojno bonitetno oceno.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(6) by using the name of ESMA or any competent authority in such a way that would indicate or suggest endorsement or approval by ESMA or any competent authority of the credit ratings or any credit rating activities of the credit rating agency.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(6), če uporablja ime ESMA ali katerega koli pristojnega organa na tak način, ki bi namigoval ali nakazoval, da je ta ESMA ali pristojni organ odobril bonitetne ocene ali kakršne koli dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki jih izvaja bonitetna agencija.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 13 by charging a fee for the information provided in accordance with Articles 8 to 12.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 13, če zaračunava pristojbino ali takse za informacije, zagotovljene v skladu s členi 8 do 12.
The credit rating agency, where it is a legal person established in the Union, infringes Article 14(1) by not applying for registration for the purposes of Article 2(1).
Bonitetna agencija, ki je pravna oseba, ustanovljena v Uniji, prekrši člen 14(1), če ne zaprosi za registracijo za namene člena 2(1).
Infringements related to obstacles to the supervisory activities
Kršitve, povezane z ovirami nadzornih dejavnosti
The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 7 of Section B of Annex I, by not arranging for records or audit trails of its credit rating activities as required by those provisions.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 6(2) v zvezi s točko 7 oddelka B Priloge I, če ne zagotovi evidence ali revizijskih sledi svojih dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, kot je zahtevano v teh določbah.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the first paragraph of point 8 of Section B of Annex I, by not keeping the records or audit trails referred to in point 7 of that Section at its premises for at least five years or by not making available those records or audit trails to ESMA upon request.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 6(2) v zvezi s prvim odstavkom točke 8 oddelka B Priloge I, če ne hrani evidenc ali revizijskih sledi iz točke 7 navedenega oddelka vsaj pet let, ali če teh evidenc ali revizijskih sledi ne da na voljo ESMA na njegovo zahtevo.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 9 of Section B of Annex I, by not retaining records which set out the respective rights and obligations of the credit rating agency or the rated entity or its related third parties under an agreement to provide credit rating services for the duration of the relationship with that rated entity or its related third party.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 6(2) v zvezi s točko 9 oddelka B Priloge I, če ne ohrani evidenc, v katerih so določene pravice in obveznosti bonitetne agencije ali ocenjevanega subjekta ali njegovih povezanih tretjih oseb v okviru dogovora za opravljanje storitev bonitetnega ocenjevanja, med trajanjem razmerja z ocenjenim subjektom ali njegovo povezano tretjo osebo.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(2) by not making available the required information or by not providing that information in the required format as referred to in that paragraph.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 11(2), če ne predloži zahtevanih informacij ali če teh informacij ne predloži v zahtevani obliki, kakor je določena v navedenem odstavku.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(3), in conjunction with point 2 of Part I of Section E of Annex I, by not providing to ESMA a list of its ancillary services.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 11(3) v zvezi s točko 2 dela I oddelka E Priloge I, če ESMA ne predloži seznama svojih pomožnih storitev.
The credit rating agency infringes the second subparagraph of Article 14(3) by not notifying ESMA of any material changes to the conditions for initial registration in accordance with that subparagraph.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši drugi pododstavek člena 14(3), če ne obvesti ESMA o bistvenih spremembah pogojev za začetno registracijo v skladu z navedenim pododstavkom.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 23b(1) by providing incorrect or misleading information in response to a simple request for information pursuant to Article 23b(2) or in response to a decision requiring for information pursuant to Article 23b(3).
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 23b(1), če pri odgovoru na enostavni zahtevek za informacije v skladu s členom 23b(2) ali kot odziv na sklep o zahtevi za informacije v skladu s členom 23b(3) predloži napačne ali zavajajoče informacije.
The credit rating agency infringes point (c) of Article 23c(1) by providing incorrect or misleading answers to questions asked pursuant to that point.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (c) člena 23c(1), če na vprašanja, zastavljena v skladu z navedeno točko, predloži napačne ali zavajajoče odgovore.
Infringements related to disclosure provisions
Kršitve v zvezi z določbami razkrivanja
The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with point 2 of Section B of Annex I, by not disclosing to the public the names of the rated entities or related third parties from which it receives more than 5 % of its annual revenue.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 6(2) v zvezi s točko 2 oddelka B Priloge I, če javnosti ne razkrije imen ocenjevanih subjektov ali povezanih tretjih oseb, od katerih prejema več kot 5 % svojih letnih prihodkov.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 6(2), in conjunction with the second part of the third paragraph of point 4 of Section B of Annex I, by not disclosing in the final rating report an ancillary service provided for the rated entity or any related third party.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 6(2) v zvezi z drugim delom tretjega odstavka točke 4 oddelka B Priloge I, če v končnem poročilu o bonitetnih ocenah ne razkrije pomožne storitve, nudene ocenjenemu subjektu ali njegovi povezani tretji osebi.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 8(1) by not disclosing to the public the methodologies, models or key rating assumptions it uses in its credit rating activities as described in point 5 of Part I of Section E of Annex I.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 8(1), če javnosti ne razkrije metod, modelov ali ključnih predpostavk bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki jih uporablja pri dejavnostih bonitetnega ocenjevanja, kot je opisano v točki 5 dela I oddelka E Priloge I.
The credit rating agency infringes point (a) of Article 8(6), where methodologies, models or key rating assumptions used in credit rating activities are changed, by not disclosing immediately, or by disclosing and not using the same means of communication as used for the distribution of the affected credit ratings, the likely scope of affected credit ratings.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši točko (a) člena 8(6), kadar se spremenijo metodologije, modeli ali ključne predpostavke, uporabljene pri dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, vendar se nemudoma ne razkrije verjetnega obsega zadevnih bonitetnih ocen ali pa se obseg zadevnih ocen razkrije, vendar ne z uporabo istih sredstev komuniciranja kot so bila uporabljena pri dodelitvi zadevnih bonitetnih ocen.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(1) by not disclosing on a non-selective basis or in a timely manner a decision to discontinue a credit rating, including full reasons for the decision.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(1), če ne razkrije na selektivni osnovi ali pravočasno odločitev o prenehanju bonitetnega ocenjevanja, vključno z vsemi razlogi zanje.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 1 or 2, the first paragraph of point 4 or point 5, of Part I of Section D of Annex I, or Part II of Section D of Annex I, by not providing the information as required by those provisions when presenting a rating.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(2) v zvezi s točko 1 ali 2, prvim odstavkom točke 4 ali točko 5 dela I oddelka D Priloge I ali dela II oddelka D Priloge I, če ne predloži informacij, zahtevanih s temi določbami, ko predstavi oceno.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(2), in conjunction with point 3 of Part I of Section D of Annex I, by not informing the rated entity at least 12 hours before publication of the credit rating.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(2) v zvezi s točko 3 dela I oddelka D Priloge I, če ocenjevanega subjekta ne obvesti vsaj 12 ur pred objavo bonitetne ocene.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(3) by not ensuring that rating categories that are attributed to structured finance instruments are clearly differentiated using an additional symbol which distinguishes them from rating categories used for any other entities, financial instruments or financial obligations.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(3), če ne zagotovi, da se bonitetne kategorije, ki se dodelijo strukturiranim finančnim instrumentom, jasno razlikujejo z uporabo dodatnega simbola, ki jih razlikuje od bonitetnih kategorij, ki se uporabljajo za vse druge subjekte, finančne instrumente ali finančne obveznosti.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(4) by not disclosing its policies or procedures regarding unsolicited credit ratings.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(4), če ne razkrije svojih politik ali postopkov v zvezi z nenaročenimi bonitetnimi ocenami.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 10(5) by not providing the information as required by that paragraph when issuing an unsolicited credit rating or by not identifying an unsolicited credit rating as such.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 10(5), če pri izdaji nenaročene bonitetne ocene ne predloži informacij, ki jih ta odstavek zahteva, ali če ne prepozna nenaročene bonitetne ocene kot takšne.
The credit rating agency infringes Article 11(1) by not fully disclosing or immediately updating information relating to the matters set out in Part I of Section E of Annex I.
Bonitetna agencija prekrši člen 11(1), če v celoti ne razkrije ali nemudoma ne posodobi informacij v zvezi z zadevami, določenimi v oddelku E dela I Priloge I.
List of the coefficients linked to aggravating and mitigating factors for the application of Article 36a(3)
Seznam koeficientov, povezanih z oteževalnimi in olajševalnimi dejavniki, za uporabo člena 36a(3)
The following coefficients shall be applicable in a cumulative way to the basic amounts referred to in Article 36a(2) on the basis of each of the following aggravating and mitigating factors:
Naslednji koeficienti se seštevajo in uporabijo z osnovnimi zneski iz člena 36a(2) na podlagi vsakega posameznega oteževalnega in olajševalnega dejavnika v nadaljevanju:
I. Adjustment coefficients linked to aggravating factors
I. Koeficienti prilagoditve, povezani z oteževalnimi dejavniki
If the infringement has been committed repeatedly, for every time it has been repeated, an additional coefficient of 1,1 shall apply.
Če se je kršitev večkrat pojavljala, se za vsako ponovitev kršitve uporabi dodatni koeficient 1,1.
If the infringement has been committed for more than six months, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply.
Če se je kršitev pojavljala več kot šest mesecev, se uporabi koeficient 1,5.
If the infringement has revealed systemic weaknesses in the organisation of the credit rating agency, in particular in its procedures, management systems or internal controls, a coefficient of 2,2 shall apply.
Če je kršitev razkrila sistemske pomanjkljivosti v organizaciji bonitetne agencije, zlasti v njenih postopkih, sistemih za upravljanje ali notranji kontroli, se uporabi koeficient 2,2.
If the infringement has had a negative impact on the quality of the ratings rated by the credit rating agency concerned, a coefficient of 1,5 shall apply.
Če je kršitev negativno vplivala na kakovost bonitetnih ocen, ki jih izdeluje zadevna bonitetna agencija, se uporabi koeficient 1,5.
If the infringement has been committed intentionally, a coefficient of 2 shall apply.
Če je bila kršitev storjena namerno, se uporabi koeficient 2.