natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As the medium-term guarantee (for the duration of the restructuring plan), intended as notified restructuring aid, was an extension of the rescue aid guarantee, it was compatible until Italy withdrew its notification.
Ker je bilo srednjeročno jamstvo (za čas trajanja načrta prestrukturiranja), ki je bilo namenjeno kot priglašena pomoč za prestrukturiranje, podaljšanje jamstva za pomoč za reševanje, je bilo združljivo, dokler Italija ni umaknila njegove priglasitve.
Thus, the compatibility of the extended State aid guarantee with the internal market should be assessed starting from the day following that on which Italy withdrew its notification (i.e. from 24 July 2008).
Zato je treba združljivost podaljšane državne pomoči v obliki jamstva z notranjim trgom oceniti od dneva, ki sledi umiku njene priglasitve s strani Italije (tj. od 24. julija 2008).
The granting of State aid to a company in difficulty can be considered compatible on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty only if all the conditions laid down in the rescue and restructuring guidelines are respected.
Odobritev državne pomoči podjetju v težavah se lahko šteje za združljivo na podlagi člena 107(3)(c) Pogodbe samo, če so izpolnjeni pogoji, določeni v smernicah za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
Pursuant to points 12(a) and 14 of the guidelines, only firms in difficulty are eligible for restructuring aid.
V skladu s točkama 12(a) in 14 smernic so do pomoči za prestrukturiranje upravičena samo podjetja v težavah.
Under point 9 of the guidelines, a firm, irrespective of its size, is regarded as being in difficulty where it is unable, whether through its own resources or with the funds it is able to obtain from its shareholders or on the market, to stem losses which, without outside intervention by the public authorities, will almost certainly condemn it to going out of business.
V skladu s točko 9 smernic je podjetje, ne glede na velikost, v težavah, kadar ni zmožno z lastnimi sredstvi ali s sredstvi, ki jih lahko pridobi od svojih delničarjev ali na trgu, preprečiti izgub, ki bi brez zunanjega posredovanja državnih organov skoraj gotovo ogrozile obstoj družbe.
Under point 10 of the guidelines a firm is regarded as being in difficulty in the following circumstances:
Na podlagi točke 10 smernic je podjetje v težavah v naslednjih okoliščinah:
in the case of a limited liability company, where more than half of its registered capital has disappeared and more than one quarter of that capital has been lost over the preceding 12 months;
v primeru družbe z omejeno odgovornostjo, pri kateri je izgubljena več kot polovica njenega osnovnega kapitala in je bila v preteklih 12 mesecih izgubljena več kot četrtina tega kapitala;
in the case of a company where at least some members have unlimited liability for the debt of the company, where more than half of its capital as shown in the company accounts has disappeared and more than one quarter of that capital has been lost in the preceding 12 months;
v primeru podjetja, v katerem nosi vsaj nekaj članov neomejeno odgovornost za dolg podjetja, kjer je izguba dosegla več kot polovico njegovega kapitala, prikazanega v računovodski evidenci podjetja, in je bila v preteklih 12 mesecih izgubljena več kot četrtina tega kapitala;
whatever the type of company concerned, where it fulfils the criteria under its domestic law for being the subject of collective insolvency proceedings.
ne glede na vrsto zadevnega podjetja, če po domači zakonodaji izpolnjuje merila za uvedbo kolektivnih postopkov insolventnosti
It follows from point 10(a) of the rescue and restructuring guidelines that without outside intervention a company that has experienced a massive loss of registered capital will inevitably go out of business in the short or medium term.
Iz točke 10(a) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje sledi, da bo brez zunanjega posredovanja podjetje, ki je utrpelo velike izgube registriranega kapitala, srednjeročno ali dolgoročno zagotovo prenehalo delovati.
In an earlier decision [18] the Commission concluded that a company that has negative equity will a fortiori be considered to be in difficulty.
V prejšnjem sklepu [18] je Komisija sklenila, da se bo za podjetje z negativnim lastniškim kapitalom še toliko bolj štelo, da je v težavah.
In its Biria judgment [19] the General Court also confirmed that a massive loss of capital is indeed a sign of difficulty, and that the Commission had been right in concluding that a company with negative equity is a company in difficulty.
V svoji sodbi v zadevi Biria [19] je Splošno sodišče prav tako potrdilo, da je velika izguba kapitala znak težav in da je imela Komisija prav, ko je sklenila, da je podjetje z negativnim lastniškim kapitalom podjetje v težavah.
Legler fulfilled the criterion of point 10(a) of the rescue and restructuring guidelines as it had a negative equity in the year of 2006 (see recital 19).
Podjetje Legler je izpolnilo merilo iz točke 10(a) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, saj je imelo v letu 2006 negativen lastniški kapital (glej uvodno izjavo 19).
The Commission also notes that Legler was already considered to be a firm in difficulty within the meaning of Point 10(a) of the rescue and restructuring guidelines as at 22 May 2007, when the rescue aid was authorised.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da je bilo podjetje Legler podjetje v težavah v smislu točke 10(a) smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje od 22. maja 2007, ko je bila pomoč dodeljena.
Thereafter, Legler’s financial situation did not improve.
Po tem se finančni položaj podjetja Legler ni izboljšal.
In fact, it was declared insolvent by the competent court in 2008 (see recital 16).
Pravzaprav ga je pristojno sodišče leta 2008 razglasilo za insolventnega (glej uvodno izjavo 16).
The Commission also observes that Legler is not a newly created firm within the meaning of point 12 of the rescue and restructuring guidelines.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da podjetje Legler ni na novo ustanovljeno podjetje v smislu točke 12 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
Pursuant to point 13 of the rescue and restructuring guidelines a firm belonging to or taken over by a larger business group is not normally eligible for rescue or restructuring aid, except where it can be demonstrated that the firm’s difficulties are intrinsic and are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group, and that the difficulties are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself.
V skladu s točko 13 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetje, ki pripada večji poslovni skupini ali ga le-ta prevzame, običajno ni upravičeno do reševanja ali pomoči za prestrukturiranje, razen če je mogoče dokazati, da je vzrok težav v podjetju samem in te niso posledica samovoljnega prerazporejanja stroškov v skupini ter da so težave prehude, da bi jih lahko odpravila skupina sama.
The Commission notes that Piltar was a mere commercial vehicle, which pursued no business activity other than holding shares in Legler.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila družba Piltar samo komercialna namenska družba, ki razen lastništva delnic v podjetju Legler ni izvajala nobene poslovne dejavnosti.
None of the information available to the Commission suggests that the company’s difficulties were the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group.
Informacije, ki so na voljo Komisiji, ne kažejo na to, da težave podjetja izhajajo iz samovoljnega razporejanja stroškov znotraj skupine.
Moreover, as Piltar was fully owned by private individuals and engaged in no business activity other than its equity investment in Legler, it was not in a position to contribute to Legler’s restructuring.
Poleg tega, ker je bila družba Piltar v celoti v lasti zasebnikov in razen naložbe v kapital podjetja Legler ni izvajala nobenih poslovnih dejavnosti, podjetju Legler ni mogla pomagati pri prestrukturiranju.
On the basis of the foregoing, it can be concluded that the conditions set out in point 9 of the rescue and restructuring guidelines are fulfilled.
Na podlagi navedenega se lahko sklene, da so pogoji iz točke 9 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje izpolnjeni.
Given that Legler is eligible for restructuring aid, it now has to be assessed whether the conditions set out in points 32 to 51 of the rescue and restructuring guidelines for compatibility of the restructuring aid are met.
Glede na to, da je podjetje Legler upravičeno do pomoči za prestrukturiranje, je treba oceniti, ali so pogoji iz točk 32 do 51 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje glede združljivosti pomoči za prestrukturiranje izpolnjeni.
Consequence of the plan’s withdrawal on the compatibility of the restructuring measures
Posledica umika načrta za združljivost ukrepov prestrukturiranja
However, Italy withdrew Legler’s restructuring plan, and therefore it is no longer committed to any restructuring plan within the meaning of point 35 of the rescue and restructuring guidelines.
Ker pa je Italija umaknila načrt prestrukturiranja podjetja Legler, ni zavezana k nobenemu načrtu prestrukturiranja v smislu točke 35 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
Consequently, the Commission cannot assess the unlawful aid in the light of the criteria set out in points 32 to 51 of the rescue and restructuring guidelines.
Zato Komisija ne more oceniti nezakonite pomoči ob upoštevanju meril iz točk 32 do 51 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
Moreover, the Commission takes the view that the public guarantee and the debt-for-equity swap cannot be found to be compatible with the internal market on any other legal basis.
Poleg tega Komisija zavzema stališče, da javnega jamstva in zamenjave dolga v lastniške deleže ni mogoče razglasiti za združljiva z notranjim trgom na kateri koli drugi pravni podlagi.
The formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the Treaty in respect of the direct grant of EUR 13,2 million must be terminated since Italy has withdrawn its notification and does not intend to pursue this aid project further.
Formalni postopek preiskave na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe glede neposrednega jamstva v višini 13,2 milijona EUR je treba prekiniti, saj je Italija njegovo priglasitev umaknila in tega projekta pomoči ne namerava več izvajati.
The Commission concludes that the public guarantee and the debt-for-equity swap fall within the scope of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da javno jamstvo in zamenjava dolga v lastniške deleže sodita v področje uporabe člena 107(1) Pogodbe.
These two measures were implemented by Italy in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Ta dva ukrepa je Italija izvajala s kršitvijo člena 108(3) Pogodbe.
According to the Treaty and the Court of Justice’s established case-law, when it has found aid to be incompatible with the internal market the Commission is competent to decide that the State concerned must abolish or alter it [20].
V skladu s Pogodbo in ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je Komisija pristojna za odločanje, ali mora zadevna država članica ukiniti ali spremeniti pomoč, za katero je ugotovila, da je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom [20].
The Court has also consistently held that the obligation on a State to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to restore the previously existing situation [21].
Sodišče prav tako dosledno meni, da je namen obveznosti države, da ukine pomoč, za katero Komisija meni, da ni združljiva z notranjim trgom, ponovna vzpostavitev prejšnjih razmer [21].
In this context, the Court has established that that objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored [22].
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče odločilo, da je ta cilj dosežen, ko prejemnik odplača znesek, ki mu je bil dodeljen v okviru nezakonite pomoči, s čimer izgubi prednost, ki jo je užival glede na konkurente na trgu, ter se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere pred plačilom pomoči [22].
Following that case-law, Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/99 [23] laid down that ‘where negative decisions are taken in respect of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary’.
V skladu s to sodno prakso je v členu 14 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [23] določeno, da „če se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativne odločbe, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč“.
Thus, given that the measures at hand are to be considered as unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market, the amounts of aid of these two measures, i.e. EUR 13 million and EUR 383850 respectively, must be recovered in order to restore the situation that existed on the market prior to the granting of the aid.
Ker je treba obravnavana ukrepa šteti za nezakonita in nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom, je treba zneske pomoči teh dveh ukrepov, tj. 13 milijonov EUR oziroma 383850 milijonov EUR, povrniti, da se ponovno vzpostavi stanje na trgu pred dodelitvijo pomoči.
As regards the public guarantee, recovery shall therefore be effected from the day following Italy’s withdrawal of the notification of the restructuring aid, i.e. from 24 July 2008, and shall bear recovery interest until their actual recovery.
Glede javnega jamstva se začne vračilo izvajati na dan, ki sledi umiku priglasitve pomoči za prestrukturiranje s strani Italije, tj. 24. julija 2008, znesek pa do dejanskega vračila zneska vključuje tudi obresti.
As regards the debt-for-equity swap, the sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which the aid was put at the disposal of the beneficiary, i.e. from 31 May 2007, until their actual recovery,
Glede zamenjave dolga v lastniške deleže zneski, ki jih je treba vrniti, vključujejo obresti od datuma, ko je bila pomoč dana na voljo upravičencu, tj. od 31. maja 2007 do njihovega dejanskega vračila –
The formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the Treaty in respect of the direct grant of EUR 13,2 million to the company Legler SpA is closed.
Formalni postopek preiskave na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe glede neposrednih nepovratnih sredstev v višini 13,2 milijona EUR podjetju Legler S.p.A. je zaključen.
The public guarantee amounting to EUR 13 million and the debt-for-equity swap of EUR 383850 respectively, granted by Italy in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty in favour of Legler SpA constitute State aid incompatible with the internal market.
Javno jamstvo v višini 13 milijonov EUR in zamenjava dolga v lastniške deleže v višini 383850 EUR, ki ju je Italija odobrila s kršitvijo člena 108(3) Pogodbe v korist podjetja Legler S.p.A., pomenita državno pomoč in sta nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
Italy shall recover the aid referred to in Article 2 from the beneficiary.
Italija od prejemnika izterja pomoč, navedeno v členu 2.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest until the date of their actual recovery.
Zneski, ki jih je treba vrniti, vključujejo obresti do datuma njihovega dejanskega vračila.
As regards the public guarantee, such interest shall be calculated from the day following Italy’s withdrawal of notification of the restructuring aid.
Glede javnega jamstva se te obresti obračunavajo od dne, ki sledi umiku priglasitve pomoči za prestrukturiranje s strani Italije.
As regards the debt-for-equity swap, such interest shall be calculated from the date on which the aid was made available to the beneficiary.
Glede zamenjave dolga v lastniške deleže se te obresti obračunavajo od datuma, ko je bila pomoč dana na voljo upravičencu.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [24] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 [25] amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [24] in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008 [25] o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
Italy shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 2 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Italija z dnem sprejetja tega sklepa prekliče vsa še neporavnana plačila pomoči iz člena 2.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 2 shall be immediate and effective.
Izterjava pomoči iz člena 2 se izvede takoj in učinkovito.
Italy shall ensure that this decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Italija zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Italy shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Italija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu Komisiji predloži naslednje podatke:
Italy shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 2 has been completed.
Italija bo Komisijo obveščala o napredovanju nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler ne bo izterjava pomoči iz člena 2 končana.
It shall immediately submit, upon request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži informacije o že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepih za delovanje v skladu s tem sklepom.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Prav tako predloži podrobne podatke o zneskih pomoči in obrestih na terjatev, ki so bili od upravičenca že izterjani.
OJ C 289, 1.12.2007, p. 22.
UL C 289, 1.12.2007, str. 22.
OJ C 159, 12.7.2007, p. 2.
UL C 159, 12.7.2007, str. 2.
The rescue aid was approved for the period 5 October 2006 to 5 April 2007.
Pomoč za reševanje je bila odobrena za obdobje od 5. oktobra 2006 do 5. aprila 2007.
This figure represents the number of persons who worked full-time for the company during the entire period under consideration.
Številka pomeni število oseb, ki so bile med celotnim obravnavanim obdobjem v podjetju zaposlene za polni delovni čas.
The extraordinary shares gave the shareholder a preferential right in the allocation of profit and repayment of capital in the event of dissolution of the company.
Prednostne delnice njihovim imetnikom zagotavljajo prednostno pravico pri razporeditvi dobička in poplačilu kapitala v primeru prenehanja delovanja podjetja.
I.e. until 31 December 2012.
Tj. do 31. decembra 2012.
The plan envisaged a separate industrial plan for this site.
Za ta obrat je načrt predvidel poseben industrijski načrt.
Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2) and Commission communication concerning the prolongation of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (OJ C 156, 9.7.2009, p. 3).
Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2) in Sporočilo Komisije o podaljšanju smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 156, 9.7.2009, str. 3).
Commission Notice on application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p. 10).
Obvestilo Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki poroštev (UL C 155, 20.6.2008, str. 10).
See also the Commission’s decision in case C 59/07 of 28 October 2009 on rescue aid to Ixfin (OJ L 167, 1.7.2010, p. 39).
Glej tudi odločbo Komisije v zadevi C 59/07 z dne 28. oktobra 2009 o državni pomoči za Ixfin (UL L 167, 1.7.2010, str. 39).
SFIRS SpA (a financial intermediary under Articles 106 and 107 of Legislative Decree No 385 of 1 September 1993) prepares plans and programmes, and drafts guidelines of the autonomous region of Sardinia targeting the region’s economic and social development.
SFIRS S.p.A. (finančni posrednik na podlagi členov 106 in 107 zakonodajnega odloka št. 385 z dne 1. septembra 1993) pripravlja načrte in programe ter oblikuje smernice avtonomne dežele Sardinije, ki so namenjene gospodarskemu in socialnemu razvoju dežele.
SFIRS is an operational instrument of the Autonomous Region of Sardinia which holds 93 % of its shares.
Družba SFIRS je operativni instrument avtonomne dežele Sardinije, ki ima v lasti 93 % delnic družbe.
SFIRS is administered by a board of directors appointed by the autonomous region of Sardinia.
Družbo SFIRS upravlja odbor direktorjev, ki jih imenuje avtonomna dežela Sardinija.
Moreover, SFIRS is subject to the same power of direction and control as the administration of the autonomous region of Sardinia.
Poleg tega za družbo SFIRS veljajo enaka navodila in nadzor kot za upravo avtonomne dežele Sardinije.
Case C-482/99 France v Commission, paragraph 70.
Zadeva C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji, točka 70.
Case C-42/93 Spain v Commission, paragraph 13.
Zadeva C-42/93, Španija proti Komisiji, točka 13.
Submitted by Italy as an annex to its letter of 29 May 2009.
Italija ga je predložila kot prilogo k dopisu z dne 29. maja 2009.
Case C 32/05 (ex N 250/05) of 4 April 2007 (OJ L 277, 20.10.2007, p. 25).
Zadeva C 32/05 (ex N 250/05) z dne 4. aprila 2007 (UL L 277, 20.10.2007, str. 25).
Case C 32/06 (ex N 179/06) of 25 September 2007 (OJ L 44, 20.2.2008, p. 36).
Zadeva C 32/06 (ex N 179/06) z dne 25. septembra 2007 (UL L 44, 20.2.2008, str. 36).
C 38/07 (ex NN 45/07) Arbel Fauvet Rail SA of 7 October 2010 (OJ L 238, 24.10.2007, p. 17).
Zadeva C 38/07 (ex NN 45/07), Arbel Fauvet Rail SA, z dne 7. oktobra 2010 (UL L 238, 24.10.2007, str. 17).
T-102/07 Freistaat Sachsen v Commission and T-120/07 MB Immobilien Verwaltungs and MB System & Co. (T-120/07) v Commission.
Zadevi T-102/07, Freistaat Sachsen proti Komisiji, in T-120/07, MB Immobilien Verwaltungs GmbH in MB System GmbH & Co. KG proti Komisiji.
Case C-70/72 Commission v Germany, paragraph 13.
Zadeva C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, točka 13.
Joined cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission, paragraph 75.
Združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, točka 75.
Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission, paragraphs 64-65.
Zadeva C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, točke 64–65.
Although the Italian authorities had submitted a restructuring plan (piano industriale) for the period 2007-2009, they claimed that the actual restructuring period would run from 1 June 2007 to the end of 2012.
Čeprav so italijanski organi predložili načrt prestrukturiranja (piano industriale) za obdobje 2007–2009, so trdili, da bo prestrukturiranje dejansko trajalo od 1. junija 2007 do konca leta 2012.
The only data provided to chart the progress of the company’s restructuring from 2009 until 2012 were the cash flows and the evolution of the liabilities of the newly created company (NewCo).
Edini podatki, ki so jih predložili za spremljanje napredka prestrukturiranja podjetja od leta 2009 do leta 2012, so bili denarni tokovi in razvoj obveznosti novoustanovljenega podjetja (NewCo).
They added that as a compensatory measure, the plan involved a 22 % reduction in the company’s capacity compared to 2006 and a 40 % reduction compared to 2005.
Dodali so, da je izravnalni ukrep v načrtu 22-odstotno zmanjšanje zmogljivosti podjetja v primerjavi z letom 2006 in 40-odstotno zmanjšanje v primerjavi z letom 2005.
Therefore, they considered that the aid would not distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Zato so menili, da pomoč ne bo izkrivljala konkurence v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
It transmitted the comments to Italy by letter dated 3 March 2008.
Pripombe je poslala Italiji z dopisom z dne 3. marca 2008.
Italy provided its observations by letter dated 20 May 2008.
Italija je svoje pripombe predložila z dopisom z dne 20. maja 2008.
On 21 October 2010 Texfer SpA was declared bankrupt.
21. oktobra 2010 je bil za podjetje Texfer S.p.A. uveden stečajni postopek.