natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the notifier to submit comments on the draft review report.
Poleg tega je Komisija prijavitelja v skladu s členom 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 pozvala, naj predloži pripombe na osnutek poročila o pregledu.
However, despite the arguments put forward by the notifier, the concerns identified could not be eliminated, and assessments made on the basis of the information submitted and evaluated during the EFSA expert meetings have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing 1,3-dichloropropene satisfy in general the conditions laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Toda kljub argumentom, ki jih je prijavitelj predložil, se navedenih pomislekov ni dalo odpraviti, po ocenah na podlagi predloženih informacij, preučenih na srečanjih strokovnjakov EFSA, pa ne kaže pričakovati, da bi lahko fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo 1,3-dikloropropen, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe na splošno izpolnjevala zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2007/619/EC should be repealed.
Odločbo 2007/619/ES je treba razveljaviti.
This Decision does not prejudice the submission of a further application for 1,3-dichloropropene pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na ponovno predložitev zahtevka za 1,3-dikloropropen v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in poglavjem II Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008.
The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health did not deliver an opinion within the time-limit laid down by its Chairman and the Commission therefore submitted to the Council a proposal relating to these measures.
Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ni dal mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik, in zato je Komisija Svetu predložila predlog v zvezi s temi ukrepi.
On the expiry of the period laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 19(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the Council had neither adopted the proposed implementing act nor indicated its opposition to the proposal for implementing measures and it is accordingly for the Commission to adopt these measures,
O izteku roka iz drugega pododstavka člena 19(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS, Svet ni sprejel predlaganega izvedbenega akta niti ni navedel svojega nasprotovanja predlogu za izvajanje ukrepov in v skladu s tem te ukrepe sprejme Komisija –
1,3-dichloropropene shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
1,3-dikloropropen se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2007/619/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2007/619/ES se razveljavi.
Done at Brussels, 20 January 2011.
V Bruslju, 20. januarja 2011
OJ L 249, 25.9.2007, p. 11.
UL L 249, 25.9.2007, str. 11.
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance (EZ)-1,3-dichloropropene on request from the European Commission.
[6] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene nevarnosti pesticidov z aktivno snovjo (EZ)-1,3-dikloropropenom na zahtevo Evropske komisije.
EFSA Journal 2009; 7(10):1341. [102 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1341.
EFSA Journal 2009; 7(10):1341 [102 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1341.
on a derogation from the rules of origin set out in Council Decision 2001/822/EC as regards sugar from the Netherlands Antilles
o izjemi od pravil o poreklu iz Sklepa Sveta 2001/822/ES glede sladkorja iz Nizozemskih Antilov
Having regard to Council Decision 2001/822/EC of 27 November 2001 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Community (‘Overseas Association Decision’) [1], and in particular Article 37 of Annex III thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2001/822/ES z dne 27. novembra 2001 o pridružitvi čezmorskih držav in ozemelj Evropski skupnosti („Sklep o pridružitvi čezmorskih držav“) [1] ter zlasti člena 37 Priloge III k Sklepu,
Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC concerns the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation.
Priloga III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES zadeva definicijo pojma „proizvodi s poreklom“ in načine upravnega sodelovanja.
Article 37 thereof provides that derogations from those rules of origin may be adopted where justified by the development of existing industries or the creation of new industries in a country or territory.
Člen 37 Priloge določa, da se lahko sprejmejo izjeme od pravil o poreklu, če jih upravičuje razvoj sedanjih ali ustvarjanje novih industrij v državi ali na ozemlju.
By Commission Decision 2009/699/EC [2], the request submitted in 2009 for extension of the previous derogation was rejected whereas the requested new derogation was granted for the quantities for which import licences for sugar were allocated to the Netherlands Antilles for 2009 and 2010.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2009/699/ES [2] je bil zavrnjen zahtevek, predložen leta 2009 za podaljšanje predhodne izjeme, in odobrena nova izjema za količine sladkorja, za katere so bila Nizozemskim Antilom dodeljena uvozna dovoljenja za leti 2009 in 2010.
According to the quarterly statements of the quantities used under Decision 2009/699/EC forwarded by the Netherlands Antilles to the Commission, the consumption of the derogation granted in respect of 7000 tonnes for 2010 is currently at around 2500 tonnes in that year.
Glede na četrtletne izjave o količinah, uporabljenih na podlagi Odločbe 2009/699/ES, ki so jih Nizozemski Antili poslali Komisiji, znaša koriščenje izjeme, ki je bila za leto 2010 odobrena v višini 7000 ton, trenutno 2500 ton za navedeno leto.
On 24 August 2010 the Netherlands requested on behalf of the Netherlands Antilles a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC for the period from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2013, date of expiry of Decision 2001/822/EC.
Nizozemska je v imenu Nizozemskih Antilov 24. avgusta 2010 zaprosila za novo izjemo od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES za obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2013, ko preneha veljati Sklep 2001/822/ES.
On 8 September and 11 October 2010 additional information was provided by the Netherlands Antilles.
Nizozemski Antili so 8. septembra 2010 in 11. oktobra 2010 predložili dodatne informacije.
The request covers a total annual quantity of 7000 tonnes of sugar products originating in third countries and processed in the Netherlands Antilles for export to the Union.
Zahtevek se nanaša na skupno letno količino 7000 ton sladkornih proizvodov s poreklom iz tretjih držav, predelanih na Nizozemskih Antilih za izvoz v Unijo.
The request for a new derogation aims at allowing the use of raw sugar from third countries to be aromatized, coloured, milled and processed into sugar lumps in the Netherlands Antilles while conferring OCTs (Overseas Countries and Territories) origin.
Namen zahtevka za novo izjemo je dovoliti uporabo surovega sladkorja iz tretjih držav za aromatizacijo, barvanje, mletje in predelavo v sladkorne kocke na Nizozemskih Antilih, pri čemer pridobi poreklo ČDO (čezmorske države in ozemlja).
Moreover, the Netherlands Antilles request that for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 the yearly amount for which ACP/EU-OCTs cumulation may be temporarily allowed by virtue of Article 6 of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC would be set at 7000 tonnes.
Poleg tega Nizozemski Antili zahtevajo, da se za leta 2011, 2012 in 2013 določi letna količina 7000 ton, pri čemer se lahko za letno količino začasno dovoli kumulacija porekla AKP/EU-ČDO v skladu s členom 6 Priloge III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES.
The request for a new derogation is based on quality requirements stating that ACP sugar in the Caribbean region does not meet the criteria for a production of high quality sugar destined to Union customers, and on availability stating that ACP sugar from the Caribbean is subject to continuous shortfalls due to climatic conditions.
Zahtevek za novo izjemo temelji na zahtevah glede kakovosti, saj sladkor iz držav AKP v karibski regiji ne izpolnjuje meril za proizvodnjo visokokakovostnega sladkorja, namenjenega potrošnikom Unije, in na razpoložljivosti, saj je sladkorja s Karibov zaradi podnebnih pogojev nenehno premalo.
Furthermore, ACP States are increasingly exporting their sugar production directly to the United States and the Union.
Poleg tega države AKP čedalje bolj izvažajo svoj sladkor neposredno v Združene države in Unijo.
Further, the Union does not produce raw cane sugar which is used for the end product.
Hkrati pa se v Uniji ne proizvaja surovega trsnega sladkorja, ki se uporablja za končni proizvod.
Therefore it would be justified that the Netherlands Antilles source raw sugar in neighbouring third countries that are not part of the ACP States, the OCTs or the Union.
Zato bi bilo upravičeno, da Nizozemski Antili dobijo surovi sladkor iz sosednjih tretjih držav, ki niso med državami iz skupine AKP, ČDO ali iz Unije.
In its additional information, the Netherlands indicated that the sugar industry in the Netherlands Antilles, which should benefit from the requested derogation, aims to diversify into producing mixtures and ‘biosugar’, which both address distinctively different markets than the sugar products for which the requested derogation is submitted.
Nizozemska je v dodatnih informacijah navedla, da si sladkorna industrija na Nizozemskih Antilih, ki naj bi imela koristi od zahtevane izjeme, prizadeva diverzificirati svojo proizvodnjo na mešanice in „bio sladkor“, ki so namenjeni povsem drugačnim trgom kot sladkorni proizvodi, za katere je predložen zahtevek za izjemo.
At the moment diversification is still insufficient and the derogation would be needed to earn the necessary capital for the investments required for further diversification.
Diverzifikacija je trenutno še vedno nezadostna, z izjemo pa bi se pridobil kapital za naložbe, potrebne za nadaljnjo diverzifikacijo.
The requested new derogation from the rules of origin set out in Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC for a quantity of 7000 tonnes for products falling within CN codes 17011190, 17019910 and 17019100 is justified according to Article 37(1), (3) and (7) of that Annex under certain conditions, which aim at balancing the legitimate interests of the OCTs operators with the objectives of the external dimension of the Union’s common market organisation on sugar.
Zaprošena nova izjema od pravil o poreklu iz Priloge III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES za količino 7000 ton za proizvode z oznakami KN 17011190, 17019910 in 17019100 je v skladu s členom 37(1), (3) in (7) navedene priloge upravičena pod določenimi pogoji, katerih cilj je uravnotežiti upravičene interese podjetij iz ČDO s cilji zunanje dimenzije skupne tržne ureditve Unije za sladkor.
It is in favour of the legitimate interests of the Netherlands Antilles that the derogation concerns products which involve actual processing and the value added to the raw sugar is at least 45 % of the value of the finished product.
V korist upravičenih interesov Nizozemskih Antilov je dejstvo, da izjema velja za proizvode, ki vključujejo dejansko predelavo, dodana vrednost surovemu sladkorju pa je vsaj 45 % vrednosti končnega proizvoda.
Further, granting the derogation will contribute to the ability of the existing industry to continue its exports to the Union.
Poleg tega bo odobritev izjeme prispevala k temu, da bo lahko obstoječa industrija še naprej izvažala v Unijo.
The requested derogation is expected to generate the required turnover to finance further investments in diversification of products and activities, so that the industry concerned would no longer be required to request derogations of this kind.
Z zaprošeno izjemo naj bi se ustvaril promet, ki je potreben za financiranje nadaljnjih naložb v diverzifikacijo proizvodov in dejavnosti, tako da zadevni industriji ne bi bilo več treba zaprošati za tovrstne izjeme.
Additionally, the rules relating to cumulation of origin do not provide a solution for the sugar industry in the Netherlands Antilles.
Poleg tega pravila v zvezi s kumulacijo porekla ne predstavljajo rešitve za sladkorno industrijo na Nizozemskih Antilih.
Article 6(4) of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC sets out the periods and the quantitative limits for which cumulation of origin has been temporarily allowed, and which are compatible with the objectives of the Union’s common market organisation whilst taking due account of the legitimate interests of the OCTs operators.
Člen 6(4) Priloge III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES določa obdobja in količinske omejitve, za katere se začasno dovoli uporaba kumulacije porekla in ki so združljive s cilji skupne tržne ureditve Unije ob upoštevanju upravičenih interesov podjetij iz ČDO.
These quantities have been progressively reduced and will be finally phased out to zero tonnes on 1 January 2011.
Te količine se postopoma zmanjšujejo in se bodo končno odpravile z zmanjšanjem na nič ton 1. januarja 2011.
The phasing out of the ACP/EC-OCTs cumulation with regard to sugar, as provided for in Article 6(4) of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC, shows the Union’s intention that specific origin rules are to be more restrictive as regards sugar in order to take due account of the Union’s operators in the sugar market.
Postopna odprava kumulacije porekla AKP/EU-ČDO za sladkor v skladu s členom 6(4) Priloge III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES odraža namen Unije, da bo zaostrila specifična pravila o poreklu za sladkor, da se bo ustrezno upoštevalo podjetja iz Unije na trgu sladkorja.
That principle should be applied for the purpose of determining the quantities for which derogation is granted.
To načelo je treba uporabiti pri določanju količin, za katere se odobri izjema.
The phasing out is also justified in view of the Union’s envisaged negotiation of free trade agreements with Latin American countries, from which sugar may be usually sourced by the Netherlands Antilles.
Postopna odprava je upravičena tudi zato, ker Unija načrtuje pogajanja o sporazumih o prosti trgovini z latinskoameriškimi državami, iz katerih Nizozemski Antili navadno dobijo sladkor.
Taking into account the intention of the Netherlands Antilles’ industry to diversify away from the sugar production requiring a derogation as the present one, the amounts for derogation should be phased out over time.
Ker se industrija na Nizozemskih Antilih namerava preusmeriti od proizvodnje sladkorja, ki zahteva izjemo, kot je zdajšnja, je treba količine, ki so upravičene do izjeme, sčasoma odpraviti.
Given the low utilisation of the quantities, provided for in the past derogations, it is appropriate to provide for the double amount of the current utilisation as an initial quantity, which respects the ability of the existing industry to continue its exports to the Union.
Zaradi majhnega izkoriščanja količin, določenih s prejšnjimi izjemami, je ustrezno določiti dvakratno količino sedanjega izkoriščanja kot začetno količino; s tem je upoštevana zmožnost obstoječe industrije, da še naprej izvaža v Unijo.
In line with the envisaged phasing out, the amounts should be reduced progressively over the requested period.
V skladu s predvidenim postopnim zmanjševanjem je treba količine v zahtevanem obdobju postopoma zmanjšati.
Such a phasing out should allow, at the same time, to generate the required turnover to finance further investments in the Netherlands Antilles and to give an incentive for the sugar industry concerned there to promote the intended diversification.
Takšna postopna odprava bi morala hkrati omogočiti ustvarjanje prometa, potrebnega za financiranje nadaljnjih naložb na Nizozemskih Antilih, in spodbuditi tamkajšnjo zadevno sladkorno industrijo, da pospeši načrtovano diverzifikacijo.
Consequently, subject to compliance with certain conditions relating to quantities, surveillance and duration, the derogation should be granted for 5000 tonnes for 2011, 3000 tonnes for 2012 and 1500 tonnes for 2013.
Zato je treba v skladu z nekaterimi pogoji v zvezi s količinami, nadzorom in trajanjem odobriti izjemo za 5000 ton za leto 2011, 3000 ton za leto 2012 in 1500 ton za leto 2013.
Subject to these conditions the derogation is not such as to cause serious injury to an economic sector or an established industry in the Union.
Glede na te pogoje izjema ne more povzročiti resne škode gospodarskemu sektorju ali obstoječi industriji v Uniji.
Those rules should be applied mutatis mutandis to the management of the quantity in respect of which the derogation in question is granted.
Navedena pravila se morajo smiselno uporabljati za upravljanje količine, za katero se odobri zadevna izjema.
Since the current derogation expires on 31 December 2010, and a new derogation is requested for a period starting on 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2013, the requested derogation should apply from 1 January 2011 for that period.
Ker sedanja izjema preneha veljati 31. decembra 2010 in ker je bilo zaprošeno za novo izjemo za obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2013, se mora zaprošena izjema za navedeno obdobje uporabljati od 1. januarja 2011.
By way of derogation from Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC, sugar products processed in the Netherlands Antilles falling within CN codes 17011190, 17019910 and 17019100 shall be regarded as originating in the Netherlands Antilles where they are obtained from non-originating sugar, in accordance with the terms set out in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of this Decision.
Ne glede na Prilogo III k Sklepu 2001/822/ES se sladkorni proizvodi, predelani na Nizozemskih Antilih, z oznakami KN 17011190, 17019910 in 17019100 v skladu s pogoji iz členov 2, 3 in 4 tega sklepa štejejo za proizvode s poreklom iz Nizozemskih Antilov, kjer se pridobivajo iz sladkorja brez porekla.
The derogation provided for in Article 1 shall apply to the products and the quantities set out in the Annex which are declared for free circulation into the Union from the Netherlands Antilles during the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013.
Izjema iz člena 1 se uporablja za proizvode in količine iz Nizozemskih Antilov, navedene v Prilogi, ki so prijavljeni za sprostitev v prosti promet v Uniji v obdobju od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2013.
Articles 308a, 308b and 308c of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 relating to the management of tariff quotas shall apply mutatis mutandis to the management of the quantity referred to in the Annex hereto.
Členi 308a, 308b in 308c Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 o upravljanju tarifnih kvot se smiselno uporabljajo za upravljanje količine iz Priloge.
The customs authorities of the Netherlands Antilles shall take the necessary measures to carry out quantitative checks on exports of the products referred to in Article 2.
Carinski organi Nizozemskih Antilov sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za izvajanje količinskih pregledov pri izvozu proizvodov iz člena 2.
All the movement certificates EUR.1 they issue in relation to those products shall bear a reference to this Decision.
Vsa potrdila o gibanju blaga EUR.1, ki jih izdajo za navedene proizvode, vsebujejo sklic na ta sklep.
The competent authorities of the Netherlands Antilles shall forward to the Commission a quarterly statement of the quantities in respect of which EUR.1 movement certificates have been issued pursuant to this Decision and the serial numbers of those certificates.
Pristojni organi Nizozemskih Antilov Komisiji vsake tri mesece pošljejo izjavo o količinah, za katere so bila v skladu s tem sklepom izdana potrdila o gibanju blaga EUR.1, in serijske številke navedenih potrdil.
Box 7 of EUR.1 movement certificates issued under this Decision shall contain one of the following entries:
Polje 7 potrdil o gibanju EUR.1, izdanih v skladu s tem sklepom, vsebuje eno od naslednjih navedb:
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2011 until 31 December 2013.
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2013.
OJ L 239, 10.9.2009, p. 55.
UL L 239, 10.9.2009, str. 55.
Sugar products
Sladkorni proizvodi
of 24 January 2011
z dne 24. januarja 2011
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007 of 4 December 2007 on the second phase of the 10-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market [1] and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1451/2007 z dne 4. decembra 2007 o drugi fazi desetletnega programa dela iz člena 16(2) Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet [1] ter zlasti člena 5(3) Uredbe,
The first subparagraph of Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] provides that the Commission shall commence a 14-year work programme for the systematic examination of all active substances already on the market on 14 May 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the review programme’).
Prvi pododstavek člena 16(2) Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] določa, da Komisija začne 14-letni program dela za sistematično proučevanje vseh aktivnih snovi, ki so 14. maja 2000 že na tržišču (v nadaljnjem besedilu: program ponovnega preverjanja).
No dossier was submitted in support of the inclusion of temephos in Annex I, IA or IB to that Directive within the prescribed deadline.
V predpisanem roku ni bil predložen noben dosje v podporo vključitvi temefosa v priloge I, IA ali IB k navedeni direktivi.
In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 4(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003 [3], Member States had to cancel existing authorisations or registrations for biocidal products containing temephos with effect from 1 September 2006.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 4(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2032/2003 [3] so morale države članice s 1. septembrom 2006 preklicati obstoječa dovoljenja ali registracije za biocidne pripravke, ki vsebujejo temefos.
Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007, biocidal products containing temephos shall no longer be placed on the market.
V skladu s členom 4(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1451/2007 se biocidni pripravki, ki vsebujejo temefos, ne smejo več dajati v promet.
Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007 lays down the conditions under which Member States may apply to the Commission for derogation from the provision laid down in Article 4(1) of that Regulation and the conditions for granting such derogation.
Člen 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1451/2007 določa pogoje, pod katerimi države članice lahko zaprosijo Komisijo za odstopanje od določbe iz člena 4(1) navedene uredbe in pogoje za odobritev takega odstopanja.
It explains the need for a range of insecticides to combat the epidemics and details the actions taken to substitute temephos, as well as the ongoing research on alternative methods subsidised by the French authorities.
Tako prošnja obrazloži potrebo po vrsti insekticidov za spopadanje z epidemijami in podrobno opisuje ukrepe, sprejete za nadomestitev temefosa, in trenutne raziskave za alternativne metode, ki jih subvencionirajo francoski organi.
The Commission made the French application publicly available by electronic means on 1 August 2010 for a 60-day public consultation.
Komisija je 1. avgusta 2010 prošnjo Francije javno objavila po elektronski poti za 60-dnevno javno posvetovanje.
No objection against the derogation sought was expressed during this period.
V tem obdobju ni bilo izraženo nikakršno nasprotovanje zaprošenemu odstopanju.
Given the magnitude of the outbreaks of mosquito-spread diseases in the French overseas departments, it is appropriate to allow the continued use of temephos.
Glede na obseg izbruha bolezni, ki jih širijo komarji v francoskih čezmorskih departmajih, je primerno dovoliti nadaljnjo uporabo temefosa.
A further extension of the phase-out period for this substance is, therefore, necessary.
Zato je potrebno ponovno podaljšati obdobje opuščanja te snovi.
The extension should take effect when the previous derogation ended,
To podaljšanje začne veljati, ko se izteče zadnje odstopanje –