natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With respect to the argument put forward on the definition of the concept of a producer, it is noted that the investigation has established that the complainant is producing the like product in the EU and this manufacturing activity confers origin in line with the EU non-preferential rules of origin.
Kar zadeva trditev v zvezi z opredelitvijo pojma proizvajalec, se ugotavlja, da je bilo med preiskavo ugotovljeno, da je pritožnik proizvajal podobni izdelek v EU in da ta proizvodna dejavnost opredeljuje poreklo v skladu z nepreferencialnimi pravili EU o poreklu.
No need exists by law to provide any conclusion with respect to the status of legal entities that are not under investigation in the current proceeding, are not established in the EU or the data of which was not used during the investigation for the establishment of any finding.
Glede na zakonodajo ni treba sprejeti nobene ugotovitve v zvezi s statusom pravnih oseb, ki se v sedanjem postopku ne preiskujejo, nimajo sedeža v EU ali katerih podatki se med preiskavo niso uporabili za sprejetje posamezne ugotovitve.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the selection of the analogue country, recitals (26) to (37) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb glede izbire primerljive države, se uvodne izjave od (26) do (37) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
It is recalled that the normal value was calculated on the basis of the data provided by the sole cooperating producer in the analogue country (i.e. United States of America) and the Union industry.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila normalna vrednost izračunana na podlagi podatkov, ki sta jih predložila edini sodelujoči proizvajalec iz primerljive države (tj. Združenih držav Amerike) in industrija Unije.
Thus, for one product type imported in the EU, normal value was established on the basis of prices of domestic sales of the US producer of the like product produced in the US.
Tako je bila normalna vrednost za vrsto izdelka, ki se uvaža v EU, določena na podlagi cen domače prodaje ameriškega proizvajalca podobnega izdelka, ki se proizvaja v ZDA.
The cooperating US producer did not produce any other product types which could be compared to the product types imported from China into the EU.
Sodelujoči ameriški proizvajalec ni proizvajal nobene vrste izdelka, ki bi ustrezala drugemu blagu, ki se iz Kitajske uvaža v EU.
In order to have a broader basis for normal value, the Commission also examined whether for other product types normal value could be established on any other basis, in line with the provisions of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation (‘any other reasonable basis’).
Komisija je za zagotovitev širše podlage za normalno vrednost torej proučila tudi, ali je mogoče za druge vrste izdelkov normalno vrednost določiti na kakršni koli drugi podlagi v skladu z določbami člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe („na kateri koli drugi razumni osnovi“).
At the provisional stage, it was found that verified information on costs of the Union industry could be used for some product types.
V začasni fazi je bilo ugotovljeno, da je mogoče za nekatere vrste uporabiti preverjene informacije o stroških industrije Unije.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the Chinese producer submitted comments with regard to the normal value.
Kitajski proizvajalec je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov predložil pripombe glede normalne vrednosti.
The Chinese producer claimed that the normal value should be adjusted downwards by an amount representing the cost difference between self-produced and externally purchased accelerators, since the Chinese company produces accelerators while the US producer and the Union industry purchases them.
Kitajski proizvajalec je trdil, da je treba normalno vrednost zmanjšati za znesek, ki pomeni razliko v stroških med pospeševalniki iz lastne proizvodnje in v tujini kupljenimi pospeševalniki, saj kitajska družba pospeševalnike proizvaja, medtem ko jih ameriški proizvajalec in industrija Unije kupujeta.
As regards this claim, it should be noted that it was not accompanied by any factual evidence, despite the fact that the Commission requested such evidence in the course of the investigation.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba opozoriti, da ni bila podprta z nobenim dejanskim dokazom, čeprav je Komisija med preiskavo zahtevala take dokaze.
The Chinese producer requested the Commission to provide the exact specification of the specific model types used for the normal value calculation.
Kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je Komisijo pozval, naj predloži natančne specifikacije za posamezne vrste modelov, uporabljenih za izračun normalne vrednosti.
In this respect it is noted that the Union industry and the analogue country producer consider this type of information as confidential.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da industrija Unije in proizvajalec v primerljivi državi to vrsto informacij štejeta za zaupno.
Indeed, if one disclosed the exact name of models, account taken of the fact that the models belonged only to one series and that the specific features of this series were already disclosed, and that only a limited number of model types were used for the purpose of normal value calculations, then parties receiving such disclosure would be able to derive the actual prices charged for the specific model types or the cost and prices on the basis of which normal value was constructed for various model types.
Če bi se razkrilo natančno ime modelov, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da so modeli spadali le v eno serijo, katere posebne lastnosti so bile že razkrite, in da se je za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabilo le nekaj vrst modelov, bi lahko strani, ki bi jim bile te informacije razkrite, lahko sklepale o dejanskih cenah, zaračunanih za posamezne vrste modelov, ali stroških in cenah, na podlagi katerih je bila normalna vrednost izračunana za različne vrste modelov.
Such information is indeed confidential by nature and therefore this request had to be rejected.
Te informacije so dejansko zaupne, zato je bilo treba ta zahtevek zavrniti.
The Chinese producer expressed doubts on the way the Commission determined the normal value derived from Union industry data.
Kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je dvomil o načinu, kako je Komisija določila normalno vrednost na podlagi podatkov industrije Unije.
It submitted that actual sales prices should be used rather than price offers for tenders.
Trdil je, da bi bilo treba namesto ponujenih cen na razpisih uporabiti dejanske prodajne cene.
Firstly, it is pertinent to recall that data from the Union industry were used in order to have a higher percentage of representativity of the comparison between normal value and the export sales made by the Chinese producer.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da so se podatki iz industrije Unije uporabili za doseganje večje reprezentativnosti za primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozom kitajskega proizvajalca.
Therefore, to the extent possible, for the types of product concerned for which no normal value could be established on the basis of information available in the US, normal value was established on the basis of verified information from the Union industry for the same types of products that were imported from China.
Zato je bila normalna vrednost, kolikor je bilo to mogoče, za vrste zadevnega izdelka, za katere na podlagi informacij, ki so bile na voljo v ZDA, ni bilo mogoče določiti normalne vrednosti, določena na podlagi preverjenih informacij iz industrije Unije za enake vrste izdelkov, kot so bili uvoženi iz Kitajske.
Thus, normal value was constructed for a number of product types (in any event other than mobile scanning systems) on the basis of standard costs, without taking into consideration any civil works or other on-site costs, and by adding a normal percentage for profit which was in any event significantly lower than the target profit used for the determination of the injury margin.
Tako je bila normalna vrednost za več vrst izdelkov (ki nikakor niso premični sistemi za preglede) izračunana na podlagi standardnih stroškov, pri čemer niso bili upoštevani stroški javnih del ali drugi stroški, nastali na kraju samem, prištel pa se je normalni delež dobička, ki je bil vsekakor znatno manjši od ciljnega dobička, uporabljenega za določitev stopnje škode.
The investigation established that the Union industry applies standard costs for all types of products it offers.
Med preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da industrija Unije za vse vrste izdelkov, ki jih ponuja, uporablja standardne stroške.
The records concerning the preparation of these standard costs, the way they are calculated and their comparison to the real cost in standard costing were verified and found to be in order.
Evidenca v zvezi s pripravo teh standardnih stroškov, način njihovega izračunavanja in primerjava teh stroškov z dejanskimi stroški pri določanju standardnih stroškov so bili pregledani in potrjeno pravilni.
Furthermore, the cost structure of the Union industry was compared with the cost structure of the US producer of the like product.
Poleg tega se je stroškovna struktura industrije Unije primerjala s stroškovno strukturo ameriškega proizvajalca podobnega izdelka.
It was found that (i) the profit margin of the US producer was higher than the profit margin used to construct normal value on the basis of data from the Union industry and (ii) the cost structure of the Union industry is broadly similar to the one of the analogue country producer (the exact difference cannot be disclosed for reasons of confidentiality).
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da (i) je bila stopnja dobička ameriškega proizvajalca višja kot stopnja dobička, uporabljena za izračun normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz industrije Unije, ter da (ii) je stroškovna struktura industrije Unije na splošno podobna stroškovni strukturi proizvajalca v primerljivi državi (natančne razlike ni mogoče razkriti zaradi zaupnosti).
Thus, the use of Union industry data to determine normal value is clearly in line with the provisions of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je uporaba podatkov industrije Unije za določitev normalne vrednosti nedvomno v skladu z določbami člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The Chinese producer also commented on the public tender on the basis of which the US producer of the like product sold mobile cargo scanning systems on the US market.
Kitajski proizvajalec je predložil tudi pripombe glede javnega razpisa, na podlagi katerega je ameriški proizvajalec podobnega izdelka prodajal premične sisteme za preglede tovora na trgu ZDA.
The Chinese producer also requested clarification as to why the normal value for the relocatable system, like the one it sold in Latvia, was not derived from the US producer’s sales but rather from Union industry data.
Kitajski proizvajalec je zahteval tudi pojasnilo, zakaj se normalna vrednost za premestljivi sistem, kakršnega v Latviji prodaja kitajski proizvajalec, ni določila na podlagi prodaje ameriškega proizvajalca, ampak se je določila na podlagi podatkov industrije Unije.
To this respect it is noted that the Commission could not use data in the analogue country because such data had not been available from the cooperating analogue country producer.
V zvezi s tem se ugotavlja, da Komisija ni mogla uporabiti podatkov iz primerljive države, ker sodelujoči proizvajalec iz primerljive države teh podatkov ni dal na voljo.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (38) to (42) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od (38) do (42) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, the Chinese producer submitted comments concerning the export price.
Kitajski proizvajalec je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov predložil pripombe glede izvozne cene.
These comments were made in relation to transactions in the Netherlands, Finland and Poland with respect to specific cost items.
Te pripombe so se nanašale na transakcije na Nizozemskem, Finskem in Poljskem v zvezi s posameznimi stroškovnimi postavkami.
The comments which could be corroborated with verified data were accepted and the calculation of the dumping margin was revised accordingly.
Pripombe, ki so bile podprte s preverjenimi podatki, so bile sprejete, izračun stopnje dampinga pa se je ustrezno popravil.
Comments referring to some installation costs had to be rejected.
Pripombe glede nekaterih stroškov montaže je bilo treba zavrniti.
In this respect it is recalled that, although relevant actual data on the price of different elements of the product concerned was requested at various stages of the investigation, the company never made any attempt to provide any proposal for a conclusive break-down.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so se v več fazah preiskave sicer zahtevali ustrezni dejanski podatki, vendar ni družba nikoli poskusila predložiti predloga za dokončno razčlenitev.
The amounts provided subsequent to the disclosure of the provisional findings constitute new information, unsupported by accounting information or other evidence that could be verified.
Znesek, sporočen po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev, je nova informacija, ki je ni mogoče podpreti z računovodskimi informacijami ali drugimi preverljivimi dokazi.
The Chinese producer also clarified that it made one sale outside public tenders.
Kitajski proizvajalec je še pojasnil, da je eno prodajo izvedel zunaj javnih razpisov.
This representation is confirmed.
To je potrjeno.
Nevertheless, the investigation established that this sale was not a sale that occurred in the normal course of business.
Vendar je bilo med preiskavo ugotovljeno, da ta prodaja ni bila izvedena v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Therefore, this was not a transaction falling in the IP but a settlement of a contract concluded previously.
Zato to ni bila transakcija, ki bi spadala v OP, ampak je bila to izpolnitev v preteklosti sklenjene pogodbe.
Thus, the export price relating to this transaction could not be retained in the calculation.
Zato v izračunu izvozne cene v zvezi s to transakcijo ni bilo mogoče upoštevati.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (43) to (46) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od (43) do (46) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Chinese producer claimed that the comparison was made on the basis of truncated product control numbers that ignore the physical differences between the products to be compared.
Kitajski proizvajalec je trdil, da je bila primerjava izvedena na podlagi skrajšanih kontrolnih številk izdelka, pri katerih se ne upoštevajo razlike v fizikalnih lastnosti primerjanih izdelkov.
Moreover, the Chinese company submitted that accelerators, differences in types of chassis and energy levels should have been taken into consideration on price comparison.
Poleg tega je kitajska družba trdila, da bi bilo treba pri primerjavi cen upoštevati pospeševalnike, različne vrste šasij in energijske ravni.
As regards the first claim the following points should be highlighted: with respect to data derived from the Union industry, it is recalled that calculations were made with data directly linked to respective bids in public tenders, i.e. for product types that competed at the same level of trade at the same time and that were considered by the tendering authorities as being comparable.
V zvezi s prvo trditvijo je treba opozoriti na naslednje vidike. Kar zadeva podatke, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije, je treba opozoriti, da so bili izračuni izvedeni na podlagi podatkov, ki so neposredno povezani z ustreznimi ponudbami na javnih razpisih, tj. za vrste izdelka, ki so si sočasno konkurirale na isti ravni trgovanja in so jih organi, ki so organizirali razpis, šteli za primerljive.
As to data derived from the US producer of the like product, the investigation established that the product type compared fulfilled the strict rules set out under Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation, i.e. it is a product alike in all respects to the product under consideration.
Kar zadeva podatke, ki jih je predložil ameriški proizvajalec podobnega izdelka, je bilo med preiskavo ugotovljeno, da primerjana vrsta izdelka izpolnjuje stroga pravila iz člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe, tj. je izdelek, ki je v vseh pogledih podoben obravnavanemu izdelku.
Therefore, the fact that not all physical differences are reflected in a product control number or a truncated product control number does not prevent the Commission from making a fair comparison between normal value and export price.
Zato dejstvo, da v kontrolni številki izdelka oziroma skrajšani kontrolni številki izdelka niso izražene vse razlike v fizikalnih lastnostih, Komisiji ne preprečuje poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno.
More importantly, differences that could affect price comparability were looked at.
Še pomembneje, obravnavane so bile razlike, ki bi lahko vplivale na primerljivost cen.
The information on file indicates that products delivered by the cooperating Chinese exporting producer often contain additional features as compared to those used as a basis for normal value.
Informacije iz spisa kažejo, da imajo izdelki, ki jih dobavlja sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, v primerjavi z izdelki, ki so se uporabili kot podlaga za normalno vrednost, pogosto dodatne lastnosti.
As a result, the normal value has been established conservatively.
Zato je bila normalna vrednost določena previdno.
With respect to the accelerators, types of chassis and energy levels, it should be noted that the requested adjustments fall under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation but the differences in factors claimed have not been demonstrated to affect price and price comparability since no information was provided by the Chinese producer that could warrant an adjustment.
Kar zadeva pospeševalnike, vrste šasij in energijske ravni, je treba opozoriti, da zahtevane prilagoditve spadajo na področje uporabe člena 2(10) osnovne uredbe, vendar ni bilo dokazano, da razlike glede navedenih dejavnikov vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen, saj kitajski proizvajalec ni predložil nobenih informacij, ki bi lahko upravičile prilagoditev.
The Chinese producer submitted that the accelerator is an important component of the product concerned and should have been included in the product control number structure.
Kitajski proizvajalec je trdil, da je pospeševalnik pomemben sestavni del zadevnega izdelka in ga je treba vključiti v sestavo kontrolne številke izdelka.
The Commission did not include the accelerator in the product control number structure as none of the parties concerned presented any evidence that pointed to the fact that the accelerator was a factor distinguishing the different product types.
Komisija pospeševalnika vanjo ni vključila, saj nobena od strani ni predložila dokazov, ki bi kazali, da je pospeševalnik dejavnik, po katerem se razlikujejo različne vrste izdelka.
The Chinese producer also requested identification and quantification of the adjustments made to the normal value in order to bring it back to an ex-works basis.
Kitajski proizvajalec je zahteval tudi določitev in količinsko opredelitev prilagoditev normalne vrednosti, da bi se znova določila na podlagi cene franko tovarna.
Adjustments for warranty and credit costs were made to the normal value determined on the basis of the domestic sales prices of the sole US producer of the like product.
Na podlagi domačih prodajnih cen edinega ameriškega proizvajalca podobnega izdelka so bile izvedene prilagoditve zaradi stroškov jamstev in posojil.
Adjustments for transport costs, warranty costs, training costs, documentation costs and agent fees were made to the normal value determined on the basis of data of the Union industry.
Normalna vrednost, določena na podlagi podatkov industrije Unije, je bila prilagojena glede na prevozne stroške, stroške jamstev, usposabljanja, stroškov za dokumentacijo in honorarjev za zastopnike.
Concerning the request for quantification of these adjustments, the Commission is not able to disclose such data as this information is considered confidential by nature.
Kar zadeva zahtevek za količinsko opredelitev teh prilagoditev, Komisija teh podatkov ne more razkriti, saj te informacije veljajo za zaupne.
It must be noted that, similarly, when calculating the ex-works export price, the corresponding data was not disclosed to the Union industry.
Treba je opozoriti, da ustrezni podatki pri izračunu izvozne cene franko tovarna niso bili razkriti niti industriji Unije.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (47) and (48) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi (47) in (48) začasne uredbe potrdita.
The Chinese producer criticised the fact that some sales were excluded from the dumping calculation.
Kitajski proizvajalec je kritiziral dejstvo, da se nekatere prodaje pri izračunu dampinga niso upoštevale.
In this respect it is noted that the sales values of the transactions in question were originally considered for the establishment of the export prices.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so se za določitev izvoznih cen upoštevale prodajne vrednosti zadevnih transakcij.
However, the normal value for these transactions could not be established.
Vendar normalne vrednosti za te transakcije ni bilo mogoče določiti.
Thus, no comparison could be made between normal value and export price.
Normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene zato ni bilo mogoče primerjati.
The Chinese producer also claimed that the CIF values of the sales mentioned in recital (50) should have been included in the total CIF value which served as a denominator for the dumping calculations.
Kitajski proizvajalec je še trdil, da bi bilo treba vrednosti CIF za prodajo iz uvodne izjave (50) vključiti v celotno vrednost CIF, ki se je uporabljala kot imenovalec za izračune dampinga.
The calculation of a total dumping is the result of the division of the sum of the different dumping found (where a price comparison can be made) with the sum of the corresponding CIF values.
Izračun celotnega dampinga je rezultat deljenja vsote različnega ugotovljenega dampinga (pri katerem je mogoče primerjati cene) z vsoto ustreznih vrednosti CIF.
The inclusion in the calculations of the CIF values of sales for which no comparison between normal value and export price could be made due to a lack of an established normal value, would cause an arithmetical flaw in these calculations as the nominator and the denominator would no longer refer to comparable transactions.
Upoštevanje vrednosti CIF za prodajo, za katero ni mogoče primerjati normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene, ker normalna vrednost ni določena, bi v izračunih povzročilo računsko napako, saj se števec in imenovalec ne bi več nanašala na primerljive transakcije.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals (49) and (50) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi (49) in (50) začasne uredbe potrdita.
Taking into account the above, the definitive dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price duty unpaid, is 38,8 %.
Na podlagi navedenega je dokončna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot delež vrednosti CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, 38,8 %.
Comments on the findings concerning injury were received only from the Chinese producer, some of which were a mere repetition of comments already addressed in the provisional Regulation.
Pripombe glede ugotovitev v zvezi s škodo je predložil le kitajski proizvajalec, pri čemer so bile nekatere pripombe zgolj ponovljene pripombe, ki so bile obravnavane že v začasni uredbi.
Arguments concerning comments already addressed in the provisional Regulation are not repeated in this Regulation.
Trditve glede pripomb, ki so bile obravnavane že v začasni uredbi, v tej uredbi niso ponovljene.
It is recalled that in this case the information presented refers to two Union producers and one exporting producer which represent essentially the Union market.
Treba je opozoriti, da se predstavljene informacije v tej zadevi nanašajo na dva proizvajalca Unije in enega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki v bistvu predstavljajo trg Unije.