natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is necessary to ensure that competent authorities are able to request that ESMA examine whether the conditions for withdrawal of a credit rating agency's registration are met and to request that ESMA suspend the use of ratings where a credit rating agency is considered to be in a serious and persistent breach of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Zagotoviti je treba, da lahko pristojni organi od ESMA zahtevajo, da preveri izpolnjevanje pogojev za razveljavitev registracije bonitetne agencije ter da začasno prekliče uporabo bonitetnih ocen, kadar bonitetna agencija huje in vztrajno krši Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009.
ESMA should assess such requests and take any appropriate measures.
ESMA bi moral te zahteve oceniti in ustrezno ukrepati.
ESMA should be able to impose periodic penalty payments to compel credit rating agencies to put an end to an infringement, to supply complete information required by ESMA or to submit to an investigation or on-site inspection.
ESMA bi moral imeti možnost naložiti periodične denarne kazni, s čimer bi bonitetne agencije prisilil k odpravi kršitve, k zagotovitvi popolnih informacij, ki jih je zahteval, ali k privolitvi v preiskavo ali inšpekcijski pregled na kraju samem.
ESMA should also be able to impose fines on credit rating agencies, where it finds that they have committed, intentionally or negligently, an infringement of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
ESMA bi moral imeti tudi možnost oglobiti bonitetne agencije, če ugotovi, da so namerno ali iz malomarnosti prekršile Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009.
Fines should be imposed according to the level of seriousness of the infringements.
Globa bi morala biti naložena glede na resnost kršitve.
The infringements should be divided into different groups for which specific fines should be allocated.
Kršitve bi bilo treba razdeliti v različne skupine, za katere bi morale biti natančno opredeljene globe.
In order to calculate the fine related to a specific infringement, ESMA should use a two-step methodology consisting of setting a basic amount and adjusting that basic amount, if necessary, by certain coefficients.
Da bi določili znesek globe za posamezno kršitev, bi moral ESMA uporabiti dvostopenjsko metodologijo, namreč določitev osnovnega zneska globe in po potrebi prilagoditev tega zneska z nekaterimi količniki.
The basic amount should be established by taking into account the annual turnover of the credit rating agency concerned and the adjustments should be made by increasing or decreasing the basic amount through the application of the relevant coefficients in accordance with this Regulation.
Osnovni znesek bi bilo treba določiti z upoštevanjem letnega prometa zadevne bonitetne agencije, globo pa prilagajati z višanjem ali nižanjem osnovnega zneska z uporabo ustreznih količnikov v skladu s to uredbo.
This Regulation establishes coefficients linked to aggravating and mitigating circumstances in order to give the necessary tools to ESMA to decide on a fine which is proportionate to the seriousness of an infringement committed by a credit rating agency, taking into account the circumstances under which that infringement was committed.
Ta uredba določa količnike, povezane z olajševalnimi in oteževalnimi dejavniki, tako da se ESMA omogočijo ustrezna orodja za odločitev o globi, ki je sorazmerna z resnostjo storjene kršitve bonitetne agencije, pri čemer pa se upošteva tudi okoliščine, v katerih je prišlo do kršitve.
Before taking a decision to impose fines or periodic penalty payments, ESMA should give the persons subject to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard in order to respect their rights of defence.
ESMA bi moral pred odločitvijo o naložitvi globe ali periodične denarne kazni dati osebam, ki so v postopku, možnost zagovora, da se upošteva njihova pravica do obrambe.
Member States should remain competent to lay down and implement the rules on penalties applicable to the infringement of the obligation on financial institutions and other entities to use, for regulatory purposes, only credit ratings issued by credit rating agencies registered in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Države članice bi morale ostati pristojne za določanje in izvajanje pravil o kaznih za kršitve obveznosti finančnih institucij in drugih subjektov, da v regulatorne namene uporabljajo samo bonitetne ocene, ki jih izdajo bonitetne agencije, registrirane v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009.
This Regulation should not create a precedent for the imposition of financial or non-financial penalties by European Supervisory Authorities on financial market participants or other undertakings in relation to other types of activity.
Ta uredba ne bi smela povzročiti precedensa za to, da bi evropski nadzorni organi lahko nalagali denarne ali nedenarne sankcije oziroma kazni udeležencem na finančnem trgu ali drugim podjetjem v zvezi z drugimi vrstami dejavnosti.
ESMA should refrain from imposing fines or periodic penalty payments where a prior acquittal or conviction arising from identical facts, or from facts which are substantially the same, has acquired the force of res judicata as the result of criminal proceedings under national law.
ESMA ne bi smel nalagati glob ali periodičnih denarnih kazni, kadar je predhodna oprostilna sodba ali obsodba, izhajajoča iz identičnega ali skoraj identičnega dejanskega stanja, postala pravnomočna v kazenskem postopku po nacionalnem pravu.
ESMA decisions imposing fines and periodic penalty payments should be enforceable and their enforcement should be governed by the rules of civil procedure which are in force in the State in the territory of which it is carried out.
Globe in periodične denarne kazni, ki jih naloži ESMA, bi morale biti izvršljive, njihovo izvršbo pa bi morala urejati pravila civilnega postopka, ki veljajo v državi, na ozemlju katere se opravi izvršba.
Rules of civil procedure should not include criminal procedural rules but it should be possible that they include administrative procedural rules.
Pravila civilnega postopka ne bi smela zajemati pravil kazenskega postopka, lahko pa bi zajemala pravila upravnega postopka.
In the case of an infringement committed by a credit rating agency, ESMA should be empowered to take a range of supervisory measures, including, but not limited to, requiring the credit rating agency to bring the infringement to an end, suspending the use of credit ratings for regulatory purposes, temporarily prohibiting the credit rating agency from issuing credit ratings and, as a last resort, withdrawing the registration when the credit rating agency has seriously or repeatedly infringed Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
V primeru, da bonitetna agencija krši določbe, bi lahko ESMA sprejel več nadzornih ukrepov, npr. da od bonitetne agencije zahteva odpravo kršitve, začasno prekine uporabo ocen za regulativne namene, bonitetni agenciji začasno prepreči izdajanje ocen in kot skrajni ukrep razveljavi registracijo, kadar bonitetna agencija resno ali večkrat krši določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009.
The supervisory measures should be applied by ESMA taking into account the nature and seriousness of the infringement and should respect the principle of proportionality.
Nadzorne ukrepe bi moral ESMA uporabiti z upoštevanjem narave in resnosti kršitve in bi moral pri tem spoštovati načelo sorazmernosti.
Before taking a decision on supervisory measures, ESMA should give the persons subject to the proceedings the opportunity to be heard in order to respect their rights of defence.
Pred sprejetjem odločitve o nadzornih ukrepih bi moral ESMA osebam, ki so v postopku, dati možnost zagovora, da se upošteva njihova pravica do obrambe.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and by the constitutional traditions in the Member States.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana zlasti v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, pa tudi v ustavnih tradicijah držav članic.
Accordingly, this Regulation should be interpreted and applied in accordance with those rights and principles, including those relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression in the media, and the right to interpretation and translation for those who do not speak or understand the language of the proceedings as part of the general right to a fair trial.
Zato bi bilo treba to uredbo razlagati in uporabljati v skladu s temi pravicami in načeli, tudi tistimi, ki se nanašajo na svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v medijih ter na pravico do tolmačenja in prevajanja za tiste, ki ne govorijo oziroma razumejo jezika postopka, kar spada v splošno pravico do poštenega sojenja.
For reasons of legal certainty, it is appropriate to establish clear transitional measures for the transmission of files and working documents from the competent authorities to ESMA.
Za namene pravne varnosti je primerno, da se uvedejo jasni prehodni ukrepi za posredovanje spisov in delovnih dokumentov pristojnih organov ESMA.
The registration of a credit rating agency granted by a competent authority should remain valid throughout the Union after the transition of supervisory powers from the competent authorities to ESMA.
Registracija bonitetne agencije, ki jo je izdal pristojni organ, bi morala tudi po prenosu nadzornih pooblastil pristojnih organov na ESMA ostati veljavna po vsej Uniji.
The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU in order to specify further or amend the criteria for assessing the equivalence of the regulatory and supervisory framework of a third country in order to take into account developments on financial markets, to adopt a regulation on fees and detailed rules concerning fines and periodic penalty payments, and to amend the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Komisijo bi bilo treba pooblastiti, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme delegirane akte v zvezi z nadaljnjim določanjem ali spremembo meril za ocenjevanje enakovrednosti regulativnega in nadzornega pravnega okvira tretje države, da bi se upošteval razvoj na finančnih trgih, sprejela uredba o pristojbinah in taksah in podrobna pravila o globah in periodičnih denarnih kaznih ter da bi spremenila priloge Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009.
When preparing and drawing up delegated acts, the Commission should ensure the early and ongoing transmission of information on relevant documents to the European Parliament and the Council.
Pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov bi morala Komisija zagotoviti zgodnje in stalno posredovanje informacij o zadevnih dokumentih Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The European Parliament and the Council should have three months from the date of notification to object to a delegated act.
(31) Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala imeti na voljo tri mesece od datuma uradnega obvestila, da nasprotujeta delegiranemu aktu.
On the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council, it should be possible to prolong that period by three months in regard to significant areas of concern.
Na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta bi moralo biti mogoče to obdobje podaljšati za tri mesece za pomembnejša področja.
It should also be possible for the European Parliament and the Council to inform the other institutions of their intention not to raise objections.
Evropski parlament in Svet bi morala imeti tudi možnost, da sporočita drugim institucijam, da ne nameravata nasprotovati.
Such early approval of delegated acts is particularly appropriate when deadlines need to be met, for example where there are timetables in the basic act for the Commission to adopt delegated acts.
Ta zgodnja odobritev delegiranih aktov je še posebej ustrezna, kadar se je treba držati rokov, če na primer za Komisijo obstajajo roki za sprejetje delegiranih aktov, določeni v temeljnem aktu.
In the Declaration on Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, the Conference took note of the Commission's intention to continue to consult experts appointed by the Member States in the preparation of draft delegated acts in the financial services area, in accordance with its established practice.
V izjavi o členu 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, priloženi sklepni listini medvladne konference, ki je sprejela Lizbonsko pogodbo, se konferenca seznanja, da namerava Komisija v skladu s svojo ustaljeno prakso pri pripravi osnutkov delegiranih aktov na področju finančnih storitev nadaljevati posvetovanje s strokovnjaki, ki jih imenujejo države članice.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [6] applies to the processing of personal data for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [6] se uporablja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov za namene Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [7] is fully applicable to the processing of personal data for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani institucij in organov Skupnosti ter o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [7] se uporablja v celoti za obdelavo osebnih podatkov za namene Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009.
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely setting up an efficient and effective supervisory framework for credit rating agencies by entrusting a single supervisory authority with the supervision of credit rating activities in the Union, providing a single point of contact for credit rating agencies and ensuring the consistent application of the rules for credit rating agencies, cannot be sufficiently achieved at the Member State level and can therefore, by reason of the pan-Union structure and impact of the credit rating activities to be supervised, be better achieved at the Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker ciljev te uredbe, in sicer vzpostavitve uspešnega in učinkovitega nadzornega okvira za bonitetne agencije tako, da se nadzor dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja v Uniji zaupa enemu samemu nadzornemu organu, nudenja ene same kontaktne točke za bonitetne agencije in zagotavljanja dosledne uporabe pravil za bonitetne agencije, ni mogoče zadovoljivo doseči na ravni držav članic, temveč se zaradi vseevropske strukture in učinka dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki jih je treba nadzirati, lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 1060/2009 bi bilo treba zato ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1060/2009 se spremeni:
in Article 3(1), the following points are added:
V členu 3(1) se dodajo naslednje točke:
“competent authorities” means the authorities designated by each Member State in accordance with Article 22;
‚pristojni organipomeni organe‘ ki jih države članice imenujejo v skladu s členom 22;
“sectoral legislation” means the legal acts of the Union referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 4(1);
‚,področna zakonodaja‘ pomeni pravne akte Unije iz prvega pododstavka člena 4(1);
“sectoral competent authorities” means the national competent authorities designated under the relevant sectoral legislation for the supervision of credit institutions, investment firms, insurance undertakings, assurance undertakings, reinsurance undertakings, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), institutions for occupational retirement provision and alternative investment funds.’;
‚pristojni področni organi‘ pomeni pristojne nacionalne organe, ki so v skladu z ustrezno področno zakonodajo določeni za nadzor kreditnih institucij, investicijskih podjetij, zavarovalnic, pozavarovalnic, kolektivnih naložbenih podjemov za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP), institucij za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje in alternativnih investicijskih skladov.“
Credit institutions as defined in Directive 2006/48/EC, investment firms as defined in Directive 2004/39/EC, insurance undertakings subject to the First Council Directive 73/239/EEC of 24 July 1973 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assurance, assurance undertakings as defined in Directive 2002/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 concerning life assurance, reinsurance undertakings as defined in Directive 2005/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2005 on reinsurance, UCITS as defined in Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), institutions for occupational retirement provision as defined in Directive 2003/41/EC and alternative investment funds may use credit ratings for regulatory purposes only if they are issued by credit rating agencies established in the Union and registered in accordance with this Regulation.
Kreditne institucije, kot so opredeljene v Direktivi 2006/48/ES, investicijska podjetja, kot so opredeljena v Direktivi 2004/39/ES, zavarovalnice, ki so urejene s Prvo direktivo Sveta 73/239/EGS z dne 24. julija 1973 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti neposrednega zavarovanja razen življenjskega zavarovanja, zavarovalnice, kot so opredeljene v Direktivi 2002/83/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. novembra 2002 o življenjskem zavarovanju, pozavarovalnice, kot so opredeljene v Direktivi 2005/68/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. novembra 2005 o pozavarovanju, KNPVP, kot so opredeljeni v Direktivi 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP), institucije za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje, kot so opredeljene v Direktivi 2003/41/ES, lahko v regulatorne namene uporabljajo samo bonitetne ocene, ki jih izdajo bonitetne agencije s sedežem v Uniji in registrirane v skladu s to uredbo.
points (b), (c) and (d) are replaced by the following:
točke (b), (c) in (d) se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
the credit rating agency has verified and is able to demonstrate on an ongoing basis to the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (ESMA), that the conduct of credit rating activities by the third-country credit rating agency resulting in the issuing of the credit rating to be endorsed fulfils requirements which are at least as stringent as the requirements set out in Articles 6 to 12;
bonitetna agencija je preverila, da dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, ki jih izvaja bonitetna agencija tretje države, in na podlagi katerih se izda bonitetna ocena, ki jo je treba odobriti, izpolnjujejo zahteve, ki so vsaj tako stroge kot zahteve iz členov 6 do 12, kar lahko Evropskemu nadzornemu organu (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge), ustanovljenem z Uredbo (EU) št. 1095/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESMA), tudi neprekinjeno dokazuje;
the ability of ESMA to assess and monitor the compliance of the credit rating agency established in the third country with the requirements referred to in point (b) is not limited;
zmožnost ESMA, da ocenjuje in spremlja izpolnjevanja zahtev iz točke (b) s strani bonitetne agencije, ustanovljene v tretji državi, ni omejena;
the credit rating agency makes available on request to ESMA all the information necessary to enable ESMA to supervise on an ongoing basis the compliance with the requirements of this Regulation;
bonitetna agencija predloži na zahtevo ESMAju vse potrebne informacije, da omogoči ESMA neprekinjen nadzor skladnosti z zahtevami iz te uredbe;
point (h) is replaced by the following:
točka (h) se nadomesti z naslednjo:
there is an appropriate cooperation arrangement between ESMA and the relevant supervisory authority of the credit rating agency established in a third country.
med ESMA in ustreznim nadzornim organom bonitetne agencije, ustanovljene v tretji državi obstaja ustrezen sporazum o sodelovanju.
ESMA shall ensure that such a cooperation arrangement shall specify at least:
ESMA zagotovi, da so v sporazumu o sodelovanju določeni vsaj:
the mechanism for the exchange of information between ESMA and the relevant supervisory authority of the credit rating agency established in a third country; and
mehanizem za izmenjavo informacij med ESMA in ustreznim nadzornim organom bonitetne agencije v tretji državi, in
the procedures concerning the coordination of supervisory activities in order to enable ESMA to monitor credit rating activities resulting in the issuing of the endorsed credit rating on an ongoing basis.’;
postopki o usklajevanju nadzornih dejavnosti, da se ESMA omogoči neprekinjeno spremljanje dejavnosti bonitetnega ocenjevanja, na podlagi katerega se izda odobrena bonitetna ocena.“;
The application shall be submitted to ESMA in accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 15.’;
Vlogo se predloži ESMA v skladu z ustreznimi določbami člena 15.“;
in paragraph 3, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
v odstavku 3 se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
ESMA shall examine and decide on the application for certification in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 16.
ESMA pregleda in sprejme odločitev glede vloge za certificiranje v skladu s postopkom iz člena 16.
The certification decision shall be based on the criteria set out in points (a) to (d) of paragraph 1 of this Article.’;
Odločitev o certificiranju temelji na merilih iz točk (a) do (d) odstavka 1 tega člena.“;
The credit rating agency referred to in paragraph 1 may also apply to be exempted:
Bonitetna agencija iz odstavka 1 lahko poda tudi vlogo za izvzetje:
on a case-by-case basis from complying with some or all of the requirements set out in Section A of Annex I and Article 7(4) if the credit rating agency is able to demonstrate that the requirements are not proportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings;
za vsak primer posebej, iz obveznosti izpolnjevanja nekaterih ali vseh zahtev iz oddelka A Priloge I in člena 7(4), če lahko dokaže, da zahteve niso sorazmerne z naravo, obsegom in kompleksnostjo njenih poslov ter z naravo in obsegom izdajanja bonitetnih ocen;
from the requirement of physical presence in the Union where such a requirement would be too burdensome and disproportionate in view of the nature, scale and complexity of its business and the nature and range of its issuing of credit ratings.
iz zahteve po fizični prisotnosti v Uniji, kadar bi bila takšna zahteva preveč obremenjujoča in nesorazmerna z naravo, obsegom in kompleksnostjo njenih poslov ter z naravo in obsegom izdajanja bonitetnih ocen.
An application for an exemption under point (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph shall be submitted by the credit rating agency together with the application for certification.
Bonitetna agencija vloži vlogo za izvzetje v skladu s točko (a) ali (b) prvega pododstavka skupaj z vlogo za certificiranje.