natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should be noted that the normal value was determined without an adjustment for the gas costs borne by the Ukrainian exporting producers in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Poudariti je treba, da je bila normalna vrednost določena brez prilagoditve za stroške plina ukrajinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
This was because, as shown in recitals 32 to 34, the use of the unadjusted domestic costs and prices of the Ukrainian exporting producers in spite of the apparently distorted gas prices already clearly shows that dumping took place during the RIP.
Kakor je navedeno v nadaljevanju v uvodnih izjavah od (32) do (34), je razlog za to že uporaba neprilagojenih domačih stroškov in cen ukrajinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov kljub očitno izkrivljenim cenam plina, ki jasno kaže, da je v OPP prišlo do dampinga.
As a consequence, and given the fact that the purpose of an expiry review is to determine whether dumping would be likely to continue or recur should measures be repealed in order to determine whether the currently applicable measures should be maintained or repealed, it was considered that it was not necessary to examine whether an adjustment under Article 2(5) of the Basic Regulation was justified in this case.
Zaradi tega in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je namen pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov ugotoviti, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping nadaljeval ali znova pojavil, če bi se ukrepi razveljavili, da bi lahko ugotovili, ali je treba trenutno veljavne ukrepe ohraniti ali razveljaviti, se je menilo, da ni treba preiskati, ali je prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe v tem primeru utemeljena.
All sales of the three cooperating exporting producers were made directly to independent customers in the Union.
Vsa prodaja treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bila izvedena neposredno neodvisnim stranem v Uniji.
The normal value and export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Opravljena je bila primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene na podlagi cen franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for the differences affecting price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi poštene primerjave so bile narejene ustrezne prilagoditve za razlike, ki so vplivale na primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Accordingly, where applicable and supported by verified evidence, adjustments were made for differences in transport, handling, loading and ancillary costs, insurance, commissions and packing.
V skladu s tem in kjer je bilo to potrebno ter podprto s preverjenimi dokazi, so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v prevoznih, manipulativnih stroških, stroških natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, stroških zavarovanja, provizij in pakiranja.
The dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga je bila v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
On a country-wide basis, a weighted average dumping margin of 6-7 % was established for the three cooperating exporting producers concerned.
Na ravni države je bila za tri zadevne sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike ugotovljena tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga 6–7 %.
Spare capacity and attractiveness of the Union market
Prosta zmogljivost in privlačnost trga Unije
In the RIP, domestic sales of the three cooperating exporting producers represented on average 46 % of their production capacity.
V OPP je domača prodaja treh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov predstavljala povprečno 46 % njihove proizvodne zmogljivosti.
Though the three cooperating exporting producers sold a big proportion of their production on the domestic market, they were also dependent on exports to third countries.
Čeprav so trije sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki prodali velik delež svoje proizvodnje na notranjem trgu, so bili prav tako odvisni od izvoza v tretje države.
In the RIP they had a spare capacity corresponding to around 6 % of the Union consumption.
V OPP so imeli prosto zmogljivost, ki je ustrezala okoli 6 % potrošnje Unije.
Based on information in the review request regarding the fourth known Ukrainian producer which did not cooperate in the investigation, the total spare capacity in Ukraine during the RIP was estimated to amount to around 9 % of the Union consumption.
Na podlagi informacij v zahtevku za pregled, ki se nanašajo na četrtega znanega ukrajinskega proizvajalca, ki ni sodeloval v preiskavi, je bila celotna prosta zmogljivost v Ukrajini v OPP ocenjena na okoli 9 % potrošnje Unije.
Certain Ukrainian cooperating exporting producers claimed that they were increasingly losing market share on their domestic market to the benefit of Russian producers which can offer very low prices due to the much lower gas costs in Russia.
Nekateri ukrajinski sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da čedalje bolj izgubljajo tržni delež na domačem trgu v korist ruskih proizvajalcev, ki lahko ponudijo zelo nizke cene zaradi mnogo nižjih stroškov plina v Rusiji.
It therefore appeared unlikely that the Ukrainian domestic market could absorb the spare production capacity and therefore any increase in production is likely to be exported.
Zato se ni zdelo verjetno, da bi ukrajinski domači trg lahko absorbiral prosto proizvodno zmogljivost, zato se bo vsa povečana proizvodnja verjetno izvozila.
The three cooperating companies exported AN to many other third countries on several continents during the RIP.
Navedene tri sodelujoče družbe so v OPP izvažale AN v številne druge tretje države na več kontinentih.
However, it should be noted that certain traditional third country markets are closed to Ukrainian exports either because of anti-dumping measures in force (e.g. USA with anti-dumping measures of more than 100 %) and/or because of safety restrictions (e.g. the People’s Republic of China, Australia).
Vendar pa je treba upoštevati, da so nekateri tradicionalni trgi tretjih držav zaprti za ukrajinski izvoz zaradi veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov (npr. ZDA s protidampinškimi ukrepi več kakor 100 %) in/ali zaradi varnostnih omejitev (npr. Ljudska republika Kitajska, Avstralija).
In any event, the Union is the biggest, most attractive and at the same time geographically closest export market.
Vsekakor je Unija največji, najbolj privlačen in hkrati geografsko najbližji izvozni trg.
Its attractiveness is additionally boosted by logistic advantages resulting from low rail tariffs in Ukraine.
Njegovo privlačnost dodatno povečujejo logistične prednosti, ki izhajajo iz nizkih železniških tarif v Ukrajini.
In view of the above, it cannot be excluded that a large part of the spare capacity available in Ukraine could be used to increase exports to the Union in the absence of anti-dumping measures.
Glede na navedeno ni možno izključiti, da bi se lahko velik del proste zmogljivosti, ki je na voljo v Ukrajini, ob odsotnosti protidampinških ukrepov uporabil za povečanje izvoza v Unijo.
Prices in different export markets
Cene na različnih izvoznih trgih
An analysis of export sales of the three cooperating Ukrainian exporting producers to third countries showed that during the RIP export prices to third countries, when established on a CIF level using the international freight rates provided in the request for a review, were up to 25 % lower than the prevailing market price in the Union.
Analiza izvoza treh sodelujočih ukrajinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v tretje države je pokazala, da so bile v OPP izvozne cene v tretje države, kadar so bile določene na ravni CIF ob uporabi mednarodnih prevoznih stroškov, navedenih v zahtevku za pregled, do 25 % nižje od prevladujoče tržne cene v Uniji.
On that basis, it therefore appeared that there would be an incentive for Ukrainian exports to third countries to be shifted to the Union, should measures be repealed.
Na podlagi tega se je zato zdelo, da bi obstajala spodbuda, da se ukrajinski izvoz v tretje države preseli v Unijo, če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni.
The higher prices in the Union market would allow Ukrainian exporters to achieve better profit margins.
Višje cene na trgu Unije bi ukrajinskim izvoznikom omogočile doseganje večje stopnje dobička.
Based on the figures provided by the three cooperating exporting producers, it could also be established that on a country-wide level, exports from Ukraine to other third countries were made at dumped prices during the RIP.
Na podlagi številk, ki so jih predložili trije sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, se je prav tako lahko ugotovilo, da se je v OPP na državni ravni izvoz iz Ukrajine v tretje države izvajal po dampinških cenah.
Conclusion of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping
Sklep o verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga
In view of the findings described above, it can be concluded that the exports from Ukraine are still being dumped and that there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping in the Union market in case the current anti-dumping measures are removed.
Glede na opisane ugotovitve se lahko sklepa, da je izvoz iz Ukrajine še vedno dampinški in da obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga na trgu Unije, če bi bili sedanji protidampinški ukrepi odpravljeni.
Indeed, taking into account the existing spare capacity in Ukraine and the attractiveness of the Union market, there appears to be an incentive for Ukrainian exporting producers to i) increase their exports to the Union market and ii) shift AN exports from other third country markets to the Union market at dumped prices, at least as far as two exporting producers are concerned.
Ob upoštevanju sedanje proste zmogljivosti v Ukrajini in privlačnosti trga Unije se dejansko zdi, da obstaja spodbuda za ukrajinske proizvajalce izvoznike, da i) povečajo svoj izvoz na trg Unije in ii) preselijo izvoz AN z drugih trgov tretjih držav na trg Unije po dampinških cenah, vsaj kar zadeva dva proizvajalca izvoznika.
Furthermore, the weighted average export prices of the cooperating exporting producers to third country markets were found to be significantly lower than the prevailing price level in the Union.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so tehtane povprečne izvozne cene sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na trge tretjih držav znatno nižje od prevladujoče ravni cene v Uniji.
This reinforces the likelihood of increased exports from Ukraine to the Union at dumped prices, should measures be allowed to lapse.
To povečuje verjetnost povečanega izvoza iz Ukrajine v Unijo po dampinških cenah, če bi dovolili iztek ukrepov.
Within the Union, the like product is manufactured by 16 companies or groups of companies whose output constitutes the total Union production of the like product within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
V Uniji podobni izdelek izdeluje 16 proizvajalcev ali skupin družb, katerih obseg proizvodnje predstavlja celotno proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka Unije v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
Twelve Union producers cooperated with the investigation:
Pri preiskavi je sodelovalo dvanajst proizvajalcev Unije.
Agropolychim JSC (Bulgaria),
Agropolychim JSC (Bolgarija),
Azomures (Romania),
Azomures (Romunija),
GPN SA (France),
GPN SA (Francija),
GrowHow UK Ltd (United Kingdom),
GrowHow UK Ltd (Združeno kraljestvo),
Neochim PLC (Bulgaria),
Neochim PLC (Bolgarija),
Yara (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands),
Yara (Belgija, Francija, Nemčija, Italija in Nizozemska),
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy SA (Poland),
Zakłady Azotowe Puławy SA (Poljska),
Zakłady Azotowe w Tarnowie-Mościcach (Poland).
Zakłady Azotowe w Tarnowie-Mościcach (Poljska).
Given that these 12 Union producers accounted for around 80 % of the total Union production during the RIP, it is considered that they constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ker je teh 12 proizvajalcev Unije predstavljalo okoli 80 % celotne proizvodnje Unije v OPP, se šteje, da predstavljajo industrijo Unije v pomenu člena 4(1) in člena 5(4) osnovne Uredbe.
They will be referred to as the ‘Union industry’.
V nadaljevanju se navajajo kot „industrija Unije“.
As indicated in recitals 14 and 15, the selection of the sample of five Union producers was made on the basis of these 12 producers.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (14) in (15), je bil vzorec petih proizvajalcev Unije izbran na podlagi teh 12 proizvajalcev.
All sampled producers cooperated and sent questionnaire replies within the deadlines.
Vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije so sodelovali in poslali izpolnjene vprašalnike v rokih.
In addition, the remaining seven cooperating producers duly provided certain general data for the injury analysis.
Poleg tega je ostalih sedem sodelujočih proizvajalcev pravočasno predložilo nekatere splošne podatke za analizo škode.
SITUATION ON THE UNION MARKET
STANJE NA TRGU UNIJE
Consumption in the Union market
Potrošnja na trgu Unije
The apparent Union consumption was established on the basis of the sales volumes of the Union industry on the Union market, the sales volumes of the other Union producers on the Union market, Eurostat data for all Union imports and the information of the questionnaire responses of the cooperating companies as far as the imports of the product concerned from Ukraine are concerned.
Očitna potrošnja Unije je bila določena na podlagi obsega prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije, obsega prodaje drugih proizvajalcev Unije na trgu Unije, podatkov Eurostata za ves uvoz Unije in informacij iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov sodelujočih družb, kar zadeva uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Ukrajine.
Given the enlargement of the Union to 27 Member States in 2007, for the sake of clarity and consistency of the analysis, all injury indicators were established on the basis of the EU-27 market throughout the period considered.
Glede na širitev Unije v letu 2007 na 27 držav članic so bili vsi kazalniki škode zaradi jasnosti in doslednosti analize določeni na podlagi trga EU-27 v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
Between 2005 and the RIP, Union consumption decreased by 10 %.
Med letom 2005 in OPP se je potrošnja Unije zmanjšala za 10 %.
Total Union consumption in tonnes
Celotna potrošnja Unije v tonah
The volume, market share and average prices of the imports from Ukraine developed as set out in the table below.
Obseg, tržni delež in povprečne cene uvoza iz Ukrajine so se spreminjali, kot je navedeno v tabeli.
The quantity and price trends were based on the information obtained from the questionnaire responses of the cooperating exporting producers, import statistics (Eurostat) and Ukrainian export statistics.
Količina in cenovna gibanja so temeljili na informacijah, dobljenih iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, uvozne statistike (Eurostat) in ukrajinske izvozne statistike.
The unit prices evolved positively from 123 to 230 EUR/tonne over the period considered.
Cene na enoto so se med obravnavanim obdobjem povečale s 123 na 230 EUR/tono.
This increase in the RIP has to be seen in line with the worldwide evolution of prices and with the prices of the main raw material.
To povečanje v OPP je skladno s svetovnim razvojem cene in prav tako cene glavne surovine.
For the purpose of calculating the level of price undercutting during the RIP, the Union industry’s ex-works prices to unrelated customers were compared with the CIF Union frontier import prices of the cooperating exporting producers in the country concerned, duly adjusted in order to reflect a landed price.
Za izračun ravni nelojalnega nižanja cen v OPP so se cene industrije Unije franko tovarna za nepovezane stranke primerjale z uvoznimi cenami CIF meja Unije sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v zadevnih državah, ki so bile ustrezno prilagojene, da odražajo ceno z vsemi stroški, vključno z raztovarjanjem.
On that basis, the comparison showed that imports from Ukraine were undercutting the prices of the Union industry by 22,5 % on average during the RIP.
Na podlagi tega je primerjava pokazala, da je uvoz iz Ukrajine med OPP nelojalno nižal cene industrije Unije za povprečno 22,5 %.
An undercutting margin of 11 % was still found to exist from Ukrainian exporters when the anti-dumping duty was added on top of their prices to the Union.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da pri ukrajinskih izvoznikih po prištetju protidampinške dajatve k njihovim cenam za uvoz v Unijo še vedno obstaja stopnja nelojalnega nižanja, in sicer 11 %.
The volume of imports from other third countries during the period considered are shown in the table below.
Obseg uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav med obravnavanim obdobjem je prikazan v spodnji tabeli.
The following quantity and price trends are based on Eurostat.
Naslednja količinska in cenovna gibanja temeljijo na podatkih Eurostata.
Volume of imports from Kazakhstan (tonnes)
Obseg uvoza iz Kazahstana (v tonah)
There was a significant price increase in the Union market from all third countries which occurred in 2008 and the RIP.
V letu 2008 in OPP je prišlo do znatnega povišanja cen na trgu Unije pri uvozu iz vseh tretjih držav.
It appeared that, apart from Russia, all the countries mentioned in the table above increased their export volumes to the Union during the period considered.
Zdelo se je, da so med obravnavanim obdobjem vse države, navedene v zgornji tabeli, razen Rusije, povečale obseg svojega izvoza v Unijo.
In the case of Russian imports, they are subject to an anti-dumping fixed duty of EUR 47,07 per tonne and were imported, as the Ukrainian imports, at the lowest price compared to all other exporting countries.
Za ruski uvoz velja protidampinška fiksna dajatev v višini EUR 47,07 na tono, uvoz pa je, kakor ukrajinski uvoz, potekal po najnižji ceni v primerjavi z vsemi drugimi izvoznimi državami.
Pursuant to Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe proučila vse pomembne gospodarske dejavnike in kazalnike, ki vplivajo na stanje industrije Unije.
Since recourse was made to sampling for the investigation of injury, certain injury indicators such as production, production capacity, sales, market share, productivity and employment were analysed for the Union industry as a whole (‘Union’ in the tables below).
Ker se je za preiskavo škode uporabilo vzorčenje, so bili za industrijo Unije kot celoto analizirani nekateri kazalniki škode, kot so proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost, prodaja, tržni delež, produktivnost in zaposlenost (v preglednicah: „Unija“).
Other injury indicators relating to the performances of individual companies, such as prices, stocks, costs of production, profitability, wages, investments, return on investment, cash flow, and ability to raise capital were examined on the basis of information collected at the level of the sampled Union producers (‘S.P.’ in the tables below).
Drugi kazalniki škode v zvezi z uspešnostjo posameznih družb, kot so cene, zaloge, proizvodni stroški, dobičkonosnost, plače, naložbe, donosnost naložb, denarni tok, sposobnost zbiranja kapitala so bili proučeni na podlagi informacij, zbranih na ravni vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije (v preglednicah: „VP“).
Data relating to the Union industry as a whole
Podatki, ki se nanašajo na celotno industrijo Unije
The Union industry’s production decreased by 18 % between 2005 and the RIP, i.e. from a level of around 7 million tonnes in 2005 to a level of around 5,8 million tonnes in the RIP.
Proizvodnja industrije Unije se je med letom 2005 in OPP zmanjšala za 18 %, tj. s približno 7 milijonov ton leta 2005 na približno 5,8 milijonov ton v OPP.
As regards the production for captive use, it remained modest during the period considered and did not affect the situation of the Union industry in particular during the RIP.
Kar zadeva proizvodnjo za lastno uporabo, je med obravnavanim obdobjem ostala na skromni ravni in zlasti med OPP ni vplivala na položaj industrije Unije.
Union production (tonnes)
Proizvodnja Unije (v tonah)
Union production used for captive transfers
Proizvodnja Unije za lastno porabo
Production capacity remained by and large stable throughout the period considered.
Proizvodna zmogljivost je bila v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju v glavnem stabilna.
In line with the decrease in production, the resulting capacity utilisation decreased, from a level of 55 % in 2005 to a level of 45 % in the RIP.
V skladu z zmanjševanjem proizvodnje se je iz tega izhajajoča izkoriščenost zmogljivosti zmanjšala s 55 % leta 2005 na 45 % v OPP.
As already noted in the original investigation, capacity utilisation for AN can be affected by the production of other products which can be produced with the same production equipment.
Kot je bilo že ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi, lahko proizvodnja drugih izdelkov, ki jih je mogoče izdelati z isto proizvodno opremo, vpliva na izkoriščenost zmogljivosti za AN.
Therefore the trend in the capacity utilisation is less relevant for the assessment of the economic situation of the Union industry.
Zaradi tega je gibanje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti manj pomembno za oceno gospodarskega položaja industrije Unije.
Union capacity (tonnes)
Proizvodna zmogljivost Unije (v tonah)
Union capacity utilisation
Izkoriščenost proizvodne zmogljivosti Unije
Sales by the Union industry on the Union market decreased by 14 % between 2005 and the RIP.
Prodaja industrije Unije na trgu Unije se je med letom 2005 in OPP zmanjšala za 14 %.
This development has to be seen against the background of a shrinking Union consumption in the same period.
Pri tem je treba upoštevati, da se je v istem obdobju potrošnja na trgu Unije zmanjšala.
Union sales volume (tonnes) to unrelated parties
Obseg prodaje Unije (v tonah) nepovezanim stranem
Union sales volume to unrelated parties in third countries (tonnes)
Obseg prodaje Unije nepovezanim stranem v tretjih državah (v tonah)
The market share held by the Union industry remained stable from 2005 to 2008 but decreased by three percentage points between 2008 and the RIP.
Tržne delež industrije Unije je ostal stabilen od leta 2005 do 2008, vendar se je med 2008 in OPP zmanjšal za tri odstotne točke.
Union market share
Tržni delež Unije
The level of employment of the Union industry decreased by 8 % between 2005 and the RIP.
Raven zaposlenosti v industriji Unije se je med letom 2005 in OPP zmanjšala za 8 %.
Union employment product concerned
Zaposlenost Unije na področju zadevnega izdelka
During the period considered, the average output per person employed by the Union industry decreased by 11 %.
Med obravnavanim obdobjem se je povprečna proizvodnja na zaposlenega v industriji Unije zmanjšala za 11 %.
This is explained by the fact that the relative decrease in output bypassed the relative decrease in employment.
Razlaga za to je dejstvo, da je relativno zmanjšanje proizvodnje zaobšlo relativno zmanjšanje zaposlenosti.
Union productivity (tonnes per employee)
Produktivnost Unije (v tonah na zaposlenega)
As concerns the magnitude of the actual margin of dumping, given the currently small volume of imports from Ukraine, this impact is considered not to be significant and the indicator not relevant for the injury analysis.
Za vpliv višine dejanske stopnje dampinga se glede na trenuten majhen obseg uvoza iz Ukrajine šteje, da ni znaten in zato ni pomemben kot kazalnik za analizo škode.
Data relating to the sampled Union producers
Podatki, ki se nanašajo na vzorčene proizvajalce Unije
The sampled Union industry producers’ average net sales price increased substantially in 2008 and the RIP reflecting the prevailing favourable international market conditions of AN during that period.
Povprečne neto prodajne cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev industrije Unije so se znatno zvišale leta 2008 in v OPP, kar kaže na ugodne pogoje na mednarodnem trgu AN v tem obdobju.
Unit price (EUR/tonne)
Cena na enoto VP (EUR/tono)
The level of closing stocks of the Union industry decreased by 26 % from 2005 to the RIP.
Raven končnih zalog v industriji Unije se je od leta 2005 do OPP zmanjšala za 26 %.