natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
national strategy, criteria and procedures for the release of contaminated or activated materials,
Nacionalna strategija, merila in postopki za izpust kontaminiranih in aktiviranih materialov,
Data mentioned in this section 6 are required only if the potential consequences of the reference accident(s) are increased.
Podatki iz tega oddelka 6 se zahtevajo samo, če so možne posledice referenčnih nesreč večje.
Impact of the modification on the reference accident(s)
Vpliv spremembe na referenčne nesreče.
Data mentioned in this section 6.3.1 are required only if the potential consequences of the reference accident(s) entailing releases to atmosphere are increased.
Podatki iz tega oddelka 6.3.1 se zahtevajo samo, če so možne posledice referenčnih nesreč, ki povzročajo izpuste v atmosfero, večje.
If the assessed maximum exposure levels from the reference accident to adults children and infants in the vicinity of the plant are below 1 mSv and there are no exceptional pathways of exposure, e.g. involving the export of foodstuffs, no data on exposure levels in other affected Member States are required if exposure levels in the vicinity of the plant are provided.
Če so ocenjene najvišje ravni izpostavljenosti v referenčni nesreči za odrasle, otroke in dojenčke v bližini objektov nižje od 1 mSv in če ni nobenih izjemnih poti izpostavljenosti, ki na primer vključujejo izvoz živil, se ne zahtevajo nikakršni podatki o ravneh izpostavljenosti v drugih izpostavljenih državah članicah, če se predložijo podatki o ravneh izpostavljenosti v bližini obrata.
If not already submitted under heading 3.3:
Če že ni predloženo v skladu s točko 3.3:
Data mentioned in this section 6.3.2 are required only if the potential consequences of the reference accident(s) entailing releases into an aquatic environment are increased.
Podatki iz tega oddelka 6.3.2 se zahtevajo samo, če so možne posledice referenčnih nesreč, ki povzročajo izpuste v vodno okolje, večje.
If the assessed maximum exposure levels from the reference accident to adults children and infants close to the plant are below 1 mSv and there are no exceptional pathways of exposure, e.g. involving the export of foodstuffs, no data on exposure levels in other affected Member States are required if exposure levels in the vicinity of the plant are provided.
Če so ocenjene najvišje ravni izpostavljenosti v referenčni nesreči za odrasle, otroke in dojenčke v bližini objektov nižje od 1 mSv in če ni nobenih izjemnih poti izpostavljenosti, ki na primer vključujejo izvoz živil, se ne zahtevajo nikakršni podatki o ravneh izpostavljenosti v drugih izpostavljenih državah članicah, če se predložijo podatki o ravneh izpostavljenosti v bližini obrata.
If not already submitted under heading 4.3:
Če že ni predloženo v skladu s točko 4.3:
In relation to possible radiological emergencies which may affect other Member States in order to facilitate the organisation of radiological protection in these States
V zvezi z možnimi radiološkimi izrednimi razmerami, ki bi lahko vplivale na druge države članice, za namen lažje organizacije radiološke zaščite v teh državah:
Relevant information in relation with the modification
Ustrezne informacije v zvezi s spremembo.
Commission Directive 2010/1/EU
Direktiva Komisije 2010/1/EU
of 8 January 2010
z dne 8. januarja 2010
amending Annexes II, III and IV to Council Directive 2000/29/EC on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community
o spremembi prilog II, III in IV k Direktivi Sveta 2000/29/ES o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti
By Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 of 4 July 2008 recognising protected zones exposed to particular plant health risks in the Community [2] certain parts of the Veneto region in Italy were recognised as a protected zone with respect to the harmful organism Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 690/2008 z dne 4. julija 2008 o priznavanju varovanih območij v Skupnosti, izpostavljenih posebni nevarnosti za zdravstveno varstvo rastlin [2], so bili do 31. marca 2010 nekateri deli dežele Benečija v Italiji priznani kot varovana območja glede škodljivega organizma Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Consequently, those measures have proved to be ineffective.
Zato so navedeni ukrepi dokazano neučinkoviti.
That province should therefore no longer be included in the lists in Annexes II, III and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC as a protected zone in respect of that harmful organism.
Navedena pokrajina zato ne sme biti več vključena na seznamih v prilogah II, III in IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES kot varovano območje glede navedenega škodljivega organizma.
From the Swiss legislation on plant protection, it appears that the Cantons of Fribourg and Vaud are no longer recognised as a protected zone for Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Iz švicarske zakonodaje na področju varstva rastlin je razvidno, da se kantona Fribourg in Vaud v zvezi z Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Annexes II, III and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Priloge II, III in IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annexes II, III and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Priloge II, III in IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES se spremenijo v skladu s Prilogo k tej direktivi.
Done at Brussels, 8 January 2010.
V Bruslju, 8. januarja 2010
Annexes II, III and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC are amended as follows:
Priloge II, III in IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES se spremenijo:
in point 2 of heading (b) of Part B of Annex II, the text in the third column, protected zone(s), is replaced by the following:
Besedilo v tretjem stolpcu v točki 2 naslova (b) dela B Priloge II (varovano območje/območja) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘E, EE, F (Corsica), IRL, I (Abruzzo, Apúlia, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Emilia-Romagna (the provinces of Parma and Piacenza); Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Lazio, Liguria, Lombardy (except the province of Mantua), Marche, Molise, Piedmont, Sardinia, Sicily, Tuscany, Umbria, Valle d’Aosta, Veneto (except the provinces of Rovigo and Venice, the communes Castelbaldo, Barbona, Boara Pisani, Masi, Piacenza d’Adige, S. Urbano, Vescovana in the province of Padova and the area situated to the south of highway A4 in the province of Verona)), LV, LT, P, SI (except the regions Gorenjska, Koroška, Maribor and Notranjska), SK (except the communes of Blahová, Horné Mýto and Okoč (Dunajská Streda County), Hronovce and Hronské Kľačany (Levice County), Málinec (Poltár County), Hrhov (Rožňava County), Veľké Ripňany (Topoľčany County), Kazimír, Luhyňa, Malý Horeš, Svätuše and Zatín (Trebišov County)), FI, UK (Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and Channel Islands).’;
„E, EE, F (Korzika), IRL, I (Abruci, Apulija, Bazilikata, Kalabrija, Kampanija, Emilija - Romanja (pokrajini Parma in Piacenza); Furlanija - Julijska krajina, Lacij, Ligurija, Lombardija (razen pokrajine Mantova), Marke, Molise, Piemont, Sardinija, Sicilija, Toskana, Umbrija, dolina Aoste, Benečija (razen pokrajin Rovigo in Benetke, občin Castelbaldo, Barbona, Boara Pisani, Masi, Piacenza d’Adige, S. Urbano, Vescovana v pokrajini Padova ter območja južno od avtoceste A4 v pokrajini Verona), LV, LT, P, SI (razen Gorenjske, Koroške, Maribora in Notranjske), SK (razen občin Blahová, Horné Mýto in Okoč (okrožje Dunajská Streda), Hronovce in Hronské Kľačany (okrožje Levice), Málinec (okrožje Poltár), Hrhov (okrožje Rožňava), Veľké Ripňany (okrožje Topoľčany), Kazimír, Luhyňa, Malý Horeš, Svätuše in Zatín (okrožje Trebišov)), FI, UK (Severna Irska, otok Man in Kanalski otoki).“
part B of Annex III is amended as follows:
Del B Priloge III se spremeni:
in point 1, the text in the second column, protected zone(s), is replaced by the following:
besedilo v drugem stolpcu v točki 1 (varovano območje/območja) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
in point 2, the text in the second column, protected zone(s), is replaced by the following:
besedilo v drugem stolpcu v točki 2 (varovano območje/območja) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
part B of Annex IV is amended as follows:
Del B Priloge IV se spremeni:
point 21 is amended as follows:
točka 21 se spremeni:
in the second column, special requirements, point (c) is replaced by the following:
v drugem stolpcu (posebne zahteve) se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
the plants originate in the Canton of Valais in Switzerland, or’;
rastline izvirajo iz kantona Valais v Švici ali“.
the text in the third column, protected zone(s), is replaced by the following:
besedilo v tretjem stolpcu (varovano območje/območja) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
point 21.3 is amended as follows:
točka 21.3 se spremeni:
in the second column, special requirements, point (b) is replaced by the following:
v drugem stolpcu (posebne zahteve) se točka (b) nadomesti z naslednjim:
originate in the Canton of Valais in Switzerland, or’;
rastline izvirajo iz kantona Valais v Švici ali“.
‘E, EE, F (Corsica), IRL, I (Abruzzo, Apúlia, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Emilia-Romagna (the provinces of Parma and Piacenza); Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Lazio, Liguria, Lombardy (except the province of Mantua), Marche, Molise, Piedmont, Sardinia, Sicily, Tuscany, Umbria, Valle d’Aosta, Veneto (except the provinces of Rovigo and Venice, the communes Castelbaldo, Barbona, Boara Pisani, Masi, Piacenza d’Adige, S. Urbano, Vescovana in the province of Padova and the area situated to the south of highway A4 in the province of Verona)), LV, LT, P, SI (except the regions Gorenjska, Koroška, Maribor and Notranjska), SK (except the communes of Blahová, Horné Mýto and Okoč (Dunajská Streda County), Hronovce and Hronské Kľačany (Levice County), Málinec (Poltár County), Hrhov (Rožňava County), Veľké Ripňany (Topoľčany County), Kazimír, Luhyňa, Malý Horeš, Svätuše and Zatín (Trebišov County)), FI, UK (Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and Channel Islands).’.
„E, EE, F (Korzika), IRL, I (Abruci, Apulija, Bazilikata, Kalabrija, Kampanija, Emilija - Romanja (pokrajini Parma in Piacenza); Furlanija - Julijska krajina, Lacij, Ligurija, Lombardija (razen pokrajine Mantova), Marke, Molise, Piemont, Sardinija, Sicilija, Toskana, Umbrija, dolina Aoste, Benečija (razen pokrajin Rovigo in Benetke, občin Castelbaldo, Barbona, Boara Pisani, Masi, Piacenza d’Adige, S. Urbano, Vescovana v pokrajini Padova ter območja južno od avtoceste A4 v pokrajini Verona), LV, LT, P, SI (razen Gorenjske, Koroške, Maribora in Notranjske), SK (razen občin Blahová, Horné Mýto in Okoč (okrožje Dunajská Streda), Hronovce in Hronské Kľačany (okrožje Levice), Málinec (okrožje Poltár), Hrhov (okrožje Rožňava), Veľké Ripňany (okrožje Topoľčany), Kazimír, Luhyňa, Malý Horeš, Svätuše in Zatín (okrožje Trebišov)), FI, UK (Severna Irska, otok Man in Kanalski otoki).“
Following observations regarding the presence of that harmful organism in certain parts of the Veneto region made by the Commission during an inspection in Italy from 31 August to 11 September 2009, Italy informed the Commission on 23 October 2009 of the results of the latest survey carried out in the Veneto region for the presence of that harmful organism in September and October 2009.
Po opazovanju prisotnosti navedenega škodljivega organizma v nekaterih delih dežele Benečija, ki ga je pripravila Komisija med inšpekcijskim pregledom v Italiji od 31. avgusta do 11. septembra 2009, je Italija 23. oktobra 2009 Komisijo obvestila o rezultatih zadnje raziskave v deželi Benečija glede prisotnosti navedenega škodljivega organizma v septembru in oktobru 2009.
The results of this latest survey show that in the province of Venice there are 14 places, in which that harmful organism has been occurring for a period of at least the last three successive years in spite of the eradication measures taken by the Italian authorities.
Rezultati te zadnje raziskave kažejo, da je v pokrajini Benetke 14 krajev, na katerih se je kljub ukrepom za izkoreninjenje, ki so jih izvajali italijanski organi, škodljiv organizem pojavljal vsaj zadnja tri zaporedna leta.
The latest survey results were discussed during the meeting of the Standing Committee on Plant Health on 19-20 October 2009.
Rezultati zadnje raziskave so bili obravnavani med zasedanjem Stalnega odbora za zdravstveno varstvo rastlin 19.–20. oktobra 2009.
It was concluded that Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Sklenjeno je bilo, da je prisotnost organizma Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Winsl. et al. has to be considered as established in the province of Venice.
Winsl. et al. treba šteti za dokazano v pokrajini Benetke.
Winsl. et al. in Switzerland as of 15 November 2009.
Winsl. et al. od 15. novembra 2009 ne priznavata več kot varovani območji v Švici.
The derogation allowing certain imports from those regions into certain protected zones under special requirements should therefore be deleted and Part B of Annex IV to Directive 2000/29/EC should be amended accordingly.
Odstopanje, na podlagi katerega je v skladu s posebnimi zahtevami dovoljen določen uvoz iz navedenih regij v nekatera varovana območja, je zato treba črtati in ustrezno spremeniti del B Priloge IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES.
Commission Directive 2010/2/EU
Direktiva Komisije 2010/2/EU
amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards an extension of the use of the active substance chlormequat
o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede razširitve uporabe aktivne snovi klormekvat
By Commission Directive 2009/37/EC [2] chlormequat was included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/CEE.
Z Direktivo Komisije 2009/37/ES [2] je bil klormekvat vključen v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS kot aktivna snov.
When applying for the inclusion of chlormequat its notifier the CCC Task Force submitted data on uses as plant growth regulator which supported the overall conclusion that it may be expected that plant protection products containing chlormequat will fulfil the safety requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Ob zahtevku za vključitev klormekvata je njegov prijavitelj CCC Task Force predložil podatke o uporabah kot regulator rasti, ki podpirajo splošni sklep o možnih pričakovanjih, da bodo fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo klormekvat, izpolnjevala varnostne zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
However, chlormequat was included in Annex I to that Directive with the specific provision that Member States may only authorise uses on cereals.
Zato je bil klormekvat vključen v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi s posebno določbo, da ga lahko države članice registrirajo za uporabo le na žitih.
In addition to that use, Belgium and Sweden now have applied for an amendment to this specific provision to allow chlormequat to be used on ornamentals and grass for seed, respectively.
Poleg navedene uporabe sta Belgija in Švedska zdaj zaprosili za spremembo te posebne določbe, da se lahko klormekvat uporablja za okrasne rastline oziroma pridelavo semena.
These Member States informed the Commission on 29 October 2009 and 4 November 2009 about their conclusions that the requested extensions of use do not cause any risks in addition to those already taken into account in the specific provisions for chlormequat in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and in the Commission review report for that substance.
Navedeni državi članici sta Komisijo 29. oktobra 2009 in 4. novembra 2009 obvestili o sklepih, da zahtevane razširitve uporabe ne pomenijo nobenih tveganj poleg že upoštevanih pri posebnih določbah za klormekvat v Prilogi I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS in v poročilu Komisije o pregledu za navedeno snov.
In particular, the extensions concern applications on non-edible crops and, as a consequence, no residues in food will occur.
Razširitve veljajo zlasti za vloge za poljščine, ki niso namenjene prehrani, tako da se posledično ostanki v hrani ne bodo pojavili.
Furthermore, the other application parameters, as set out in the specific provisions of Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, remain unchanged.
Poleg tega se drugi parametri zahtevka, kakor so določeni v posebnih določbah Priloge I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, ne spremenijo.
Therefore it is justified to modify the specific provisions for chlormequat.
Zato je upravičeno spremeniti posebne določbe za klormekvat.
Member States shall adopt and publish by 28 May 2010 at the latest the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo in objavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje 28. maja 2010.
They shall apply those provisions from 29 May 2010.
Države članice navedene predpise uporabljajo od 29. maja 2010.
OJ L 104, 24.4.2009, p. 23.
UL L 104, 24.4.2009, str. 23.
In Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, row 281 is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS se vrstica 281 nadomesti z naslednjim:
chlormequat
klormekvat
Impurities
Nečistote
1,2-dichloroethane: max 0,1 g/kg (on the dry chlormequat chloride content)
1,2-dikloroetan: največ 0,1 g/kg (glede na vsebnost suhega klormekvat klorida)
Chloroethene (vinylchloride): max 0,0005 g/kg (on the dry chlormequat chloride content)
kloroeten (vinilklorid): največ 0,0005 g/kg (glede na vsebnost suhega klormekvat klorida)
Only uses as plant growth regulator on cereals and non edible crops may be authorised.
Registrira se lahko samo kot regulator rasti žit in poljščin, ki niso namenjene prehrani.
the operator safety and ensure that conditions of use prescribe the application of adequate personal protective equipment;
varnost izvajalcev tretiranja ter zagotovitev, da je v pogojih uporabe predpisana uporaba ustrezne osebne zaščitne opreme,
The Member States concerned shall request the submission of further information on the fate and behaviour (adsorption studies to be performed at 20 °C, recalculation of the predicted concentrations in groundwater, surface water and sediment), the monitoring methods for determination of the substance in animal products and water, and the risk to aquatic organisms, birds and mammals.
Zadevne države članice zahtevajo predložitev dodatnih informacij o stanju in obnašanju (preskus adsorpcije, ki se opravi pri 20 °C, ponovni izračun predvidene koncentracije v podtalnici, površinski vodi in usedlinah), metodah spremljanja za določitev snovi v živalskih proizvodih in vodi ter tveganju za vodne organizme, ptice in sesalce.
They shall ensure that the notifier at whose request chlormequat has been included in this Annex provide such information to the Commission by 30 November 2011 at the latest.’
Zagotovijo, da prijavitelj, ki je zahteval vključitev klormekvata v to prilogo, predloži te informacije Komisiji najpozneje do 30. novembra 2011.“
Commission Directive 2010/3/EU
Direktiva Komisije 2010/3/EU
amending, for the purpose of adaptation to technical progress, Annexes III and VI to Council Directive 76/768/EEC concerning cosmetic products
o spremembi prilog III in VI k Direktivi Sveta 76/768/EGS zaradi prilagajanja tehničnemu napredku
The Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP), subsequently replaced by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) by Commission Decision 2008/721/EC [2], concluded in its opinion of 15 April 2008 that Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl is safe for the consumers, when used up to a maximum authorised concentration of 0,8 % in soap, anti-dandruff shampoos, and non-spray deodorants.
Znanstveni odbor za potrošniške izdelke (v nadaljevanju: SCCP), ki ga je z Odločbo Komisije 2008/721/ES [2] nadomestil Znanstveni odbor za varstvo potrošnikov (v nadaljevanju: SCCS) je v svojem mnenju 15. aprila 2008 navedel, da je Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl varen za potrošnike, če se ga v dovoljeni koncentraciji, ki ne presega 0,8 %, uporablja v milu, šamponih proti prhljaju in nerazpršilnih deodorantih.
It should therefore be included in Annex III to Directive 76/768/EEC.
Zato ga je treba vključiti v Prilogo III k Direktivi 76/768/EGS.
The SCCP concluded in the same opinion that Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl is safe for the consumers, when used up to a maximum authorised concentration of 0,4 % as a preservative in cosmetic products.
SCCP je v istem mnenju navedel, da je Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl varen za potrošnike, če se ga v dovoljeni koncentraciji, ki ne presega 0,4 %, uporablja kot konzervans v kozmetičnih izdelkih.
However, the Committee considered that it should not be used in lip products, oral products and spray due to mucosal and respiratory tract irritation potential.
Vendar pa je odbor menil, da se ga zaradi možnega draženja sluznice in dihalnih poti ne sme uporabljati v izdelkih za nego ustnic, izdelkih za usta in v razpršilih.
It should therefore be included along with these restrictions in Annex VI to Directive 76/768/EEC.
Zato ga je treba v skladu z navedenimi omejitvami vključiti v Prilogo VI k Direktivi 76/768/EGS.
Annexes III and VI to Directive 76/768/EEC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Prilogi III in VI k Direktivi 76/768/EGS se spremenita v skladu s Prilogo k tej direktivi.
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 September 2010 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
Države članice najpozneje do 1. septembra 2010 sprejmejo in objavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
They shall apply those provisions from 1 March 2011.
Navedene predpise uporabljajo od 1. marca 2011.
In the table set out in Part 1 of Annex III to Directive 76/768/EEC, the following entry is added:
V razpredelnico iz dela 1 Priloge III k Direktivi 76/768/EGS se doda:
Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl (INCI) [1]Ethyl-Να-dodecanoyl-L-arginate hydrochloride
Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl (INCI) [1]etil-Να-dodekanoil-L-arginat hidroklorid
CAS No 60372-77-2
št. CAS 60372-77-2
EC No 434-630-6
št. EC 434-630-6
soap
milo
anti-dandruff shampoos
šamponi proti prhljaju
deodorants, not in form of spray
deodoranti, ne v obliki razpršila
In the table set out in Part 1 of Annex VI to Directive 76/768/EEC, the following entry is added:
V razpredelnico iz dela 1 Priloge VI k Direktivi 76/768/EGS se doda:
Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl (INCI) (*) [2]Ethyl-Να-dodecanoyl-L-arginate hydrochloride
Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl (INCI) (*) [2]etil-Να-dodekanoil-L-arginat hidroklorid
Not to be used in lip products, oral products and spray products.
Ni za uporabo v izdelkih za nego ustnic, izdelkih za usta in v razpršilih.
For use as a preservative, see Annex VI, Part 1, entry No 58.’
Kot konzervans, glej št. 58 dela 1 Priloge VI.“
For other uses than preservatives, see Annex III, Part I, entry No 207.’
Za druge namene kot za konzervans, glej št. 207 dela I Priloge III.“
For purposes other than inhibiting the development of micro-organisms in the product. This purpose has to be apparent from the presentation of the product.
Za druge namene kot za zaviranje razvoja mikroorganizmov v izdelku; namen mora biti očiten iz opisa izdelka.
Commission Directive 2010/4/EU
Direktiva Komisije 2010/4/EU
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske skupnosti,
Presently, there are two non-oxidative hair dye substances which are provisionally allowed for use in cosmetic products until 31 December 2010 under the restrictions and conditions laid down in Part 2 of Annex III to Directive 76/768/EEC.
Trenutno sta za uporabo v kozmetičnih izdelkih do 31. decembra 2010 v skladu z omejitvami in pogoji iz dela 2 Priloge III k Direktivi 76/768/EGS začasno dovoljeni dve neoksidativni snovi v barvah za lase.
For these two non-oxidative hair dye substances, HC Orange No 2 and 2-hydroxyethylamino-5-nitroanisole, listed under reference Nos 26 and 29 in Part 2 of Annex III, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (hereinafter ‘SCCS’) gave its final opinions on their safety.
Znanstveni odbor za varstvo potrošnikov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZOVP) je o varnosti teh dveh neoksidativnih snovi v barvah za lase, HC Orange No. 2 in 2-hidroksi-etilamino-5-nitroanizol, ki sta navedeni pod referenčnima številkama 26 in 29 v delu 2 Priloge III, dal končno mnenje.