natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Calculated on the basis of the mining fee percentages stipulated in the extension agreement (i.e. 12,24 % for fields put into operation after 1 January 1998 and J % × c for fields put into operation before that date).For details please refer to Table 1.The other components in the extension agreement (the one-off payment made in 2005 and the extension fee; see recital 14) are not included in this amount.
Izračunana na podlagi odstotkov rudarske pristojbine, določenih v pogodbi o podaljšanju (tj. 12,24 % za polja, ki so začela obratovati po 1. januarju 1998, in J % c za polja, ki so začela obratovati pred tem datumom).Za podrobnosti glej preglednico 1.Drugi elementi iz pogodbe o podaljšanju (enkratno plačilo, izvedeno leta 2005, in pristojbina za podaljšanje; glej uvodno izjavo 14) niso vključeni v ta znesek.
The opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 28 March 2009 [3].
Odločitev o začetku postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3]28. marca 2009.
Comments were received from two interested parties: MOL and the Hungarian Mining Association (Magyar Bányászati Szövetség), both on 27 April 2009.
Komisija je prejela pripombe dveh zainteresiranih strani: družbe MOL in madžarskega rudarskega združenja (Magyar Bányászati Szövetség) 27. aprila 2009.
The Commission transmitted the comments to Hungary by letter of 2 June 2009.
Komisija je pripombe Madžarski posredovala v dopisu z dne 2. junija 2009.
By letter of 3 July 2009 Hungary reported that it had no comments to make on the observations of the interested parties.
Madžarska je v dopisu z dne 3. julija 2009 poročala, da v zvezi z ugotovitvami zainteresiranih strani nima pripomb.
Until January 2008, the mining fee related to the extraction of hydrocarbons under authorisation amounted to 12 % for fields put into operation as from 1 January 1998 and J % for fields put into production before 1 January 1998 [17].
Do januarja 2008 je rudarska pristojbina za črpanje ogljikovodikov v skladu s podelitvijo znašala 12 % za polja, ki so začela obratovati s 1. januarjem 1998, in J % za polja, ki so začela obratovati pred 1. januarjem 1998 [17].
The factor ‘J’ was to be calculated according to a formula based on historical gas prices, extracted quantity and value; its minimum value was set at 12 %.
Faktor „J“ se je izračunal po formuli, ki temelji na cenah plina v preteklosti, načrpanih količinah in vrednosti; njegova najnižja vrednost je bila določena na 12 %.
Extension of increased fee to all mining fields Since the extension of the mining right had been requested for more than two fields, the increased fee (which is equal to the extension fee, as shown in Table 1) had to be applied for the following 15 years, i.e. until 2020, for all MOL fields under authorisation that were put into operation after 1 January 1998.
Razširitev uporabe višje pristojbine na vsa rudna polja ker se je podaljšanje rudarske pravice zahtevalo za več kot dve polji, se mora višja pristojbina (ki je enaka pristojbini za podaljšanje, kot je prikazano v preglednici 1) uporabljati naslednjih 15 let, tj. do leta 2020, za vsa polja družbe MOL v skladu s podelitvijo, ki so začela obratovati po 1. januarju 1998.
As regards fields put into operation before 1 January 1998, the factor ‘J’ multiplied by ‘c’ is applicable [23].
Kar zadeva polja, ki so začela obratovati pred 1. januarjem 1998, se uporablja faktor „J“, pomnožen s „c“ [23].
In its opening decision the Commission reached the preliminary conclusion that as a result of the extension agreement MOL was shielded from future changes in the mining fee and, in particular, from the changes laid down in the subsequent 2008 amendment to the Mining Act.
Komisija je v svoji odločitvi o začetku postopka sprejela predhodno ugotovitev, da je bila zaradi pogodbe o podaljšanju družba MOL zavarovana pred spremembami rudarskih pristojbin v prihodnosti ter zlasti pred spremembami, določenimi v poznejši spremembi Zakona o rudarstvu iz leta 2008.
Thus the company has been treated more favourably than its competitors, who are operating under the current authorisation regime and, not having concluded a similar extension agreement previously, have had to pay the new increased mining fees.
Zato je bila družba obravnavana ugodneje kot konkurenčne družbe, ki delujejo v skladu s trenutnim režimom podelitev in so morale plačati nove, višje rudarske pristojbine, ker pred tem niso sklenile podobne pogodbe o podaljšanju.
This Article states that: ‘Save as otherwise provided in the Treaties, any aid granted by Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the common market’. Below, in the light of this provision, the Commission assesses whether the contested measure constitutes state aid.
Ta člen navaja: „Razen če Pogodbi ne določata drugače, je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica, ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami.“ Glede na to določbo Komisija v nadaljevanju ocenjuje, ali pomeni izpodbijani ukrep državno pomoč.
Fourthly, the Commission notes that it is a matter of fact that MOL has been subject to a fee of around 12,24 % not only for the twelve fields granted extension but for all of its mining fields put into operation after 1 January 1998 operated under authorisation at the time of the 2005 agreement, and a fee of J % for all fields put into operation before 1 January 1998.
Četrtič, Komisija ugotavlja, da je v času pogodbe iz leta 2005 veljala za družbo MOL pristojbina v višini 12,24 % ne le za 12 polj, za katera je bilo odobreno podaljšanje, ampak dejansko za vsa njena rudna polja, ki so začela obratovati po 1. januarju 1998 in jih upravlja v skladu s podelitvijo, ter pristojbina v višini J % za vsa polja, ki so začela obratovati pred 1. januarjem 1998.
Moreover, MOL’s fee is set by the extension agreement at 12,24 % until 2020.
Poleg tega je v pogodbi o podaljšanju za družbo MOL določena pristojbina v višini 12,24 % do leta 2020.
Thus, there is an advantage for MOL for the majority of its fields under authorisation for a considerable length of time.
Tako ima družba MOL v skladu s podelitvijo prednost pri večini svojih polj v precej dolgem obdobju.
The Commission points out that the mining fee for fields already in operation has been amended twice recently, namely as of 8 January 2008 and as of 23 January 2009.
Komisija izpostavlja, da so se rudarske pristojbine za polja, ki že obratujejo, nedavno dvakrat spremenile, in sicer 8. januarja 2008 in 23. januarja 2009.
Firstly, it has to be stressed that the 2008 amendment to the Mining Act was designed to apply to existing mining authorisations.
Poudariti je treba, da je bil leta 2008 Zakon o rudarstvu spremenjen zaradi uporabe veljavnih dovoljenj za rudarjenje.
This is clearly shown by the fact that the wording of the 2008 Mining Act also concerns the terms of the authorisations granted before 2008.
To jasno kaže dejstvo, da se besedilo Zakona o rudarstvu iz leta 2008 nanaša tudi na pogoje rudarskih pravic, podeljenih pred letom 2008.
For these authorisations, the fees were adapted as from the entry into force of the new Mining Act.
Pristojbine za te podeljene pravice so bile prilagojene z začetkom veljavnosti novega zakona o rudarstvu.
The advantage for MOL materialised when the first amendment to the Mining Act took effect, which was 8 January 2008.
Prednost je za družbo MOL nastopila, ko je začela veljati prva sprememba Zakona o rudarstvu, tj. 8. januarja 2008.
This is the date from which MOL was de facto relieved of the burden of higher fees and consequently favoured over its competitors.
To je datum, ko je bila družba MOL dejansko oproščena bremena višjih pristojbin in je zato imela prednost pred konkurenčnimi družbami.
The amount to be recovered is HUF 28444,7 million for 2008 and HUF 1942,1 million for 2009.
Znesek, ki ga je treba vrniti, je 28444,7 milijona HUF za leto 2008 in 1942,1 milijona HUF za leto 2009.
As regards 2010, in respect of mining fee payments already made, the amount to be recovered needs to be calculated by Hungary, in the same way as for 2008 and 2009, until the measure is abolished,
Za leto 2010 mora Madžarska znesek, ki ga je treba povrniti v zvezi z že izvedenimi plačili rudarskih pristojbin, izračunati na enak način kot za leti 2008 in 2009, in sicer za obdobje do odprave ukrepa –
The state aid totals HUF 28444,7 million for 2008 and HUF 1942,1 million for 2009.
Državna pomoč skupaj znaša 28444,7 milijona HUF za leto 2008 in 1942,1 milijona HUF za leto 2009.
As regards 2010, the amount of aid has to be calculated by Hungary until the measure is abolished.
Kar zadeva leto 2010, mora Madžarska znesek pomoči izračunati za obdobje do odprave ukrepa.
This amendment was referred to in the opening decision as the ‘2008 amendment’.
Na to spremembo se je v odločitvi o začetku postopka sklicevalo kot na „spremembo 2008“.
The Hungarian authorities pointed out in their submission that this amendment was approved by the Parliament in 2007.
Madžarski organi so v svoji predložitvi poudarili, da je to spremembo leta 2007 odobril Parlament.
For the sake of consistency with the opening decision, the amendment of the Mining Act which entered into force on 8 January 2008 will continue to be referred to as the ‘2008 amendment’.
Zaradi skladnosti z odločitvijo o začetku postopka bo za spremembo Zakona o rudarstvu, ki je začela veljati 8. januarja 2008, še naprej veljal izraz „sprememba 2008“.
In the same vein, the amendment that entered into force on 23 January 2009 will be referred to as the ‘2009 amendment’.
Enako bo za spremembo, ki je začela veljati 23. januarja 2009, veljal izraz „sprememba 2009“.
In this regard, the Guidelines state that ‘Where, exceptionally, it is envisaged to grant individual ad hoc aid to a single firm, or aid confined to one area of activity, it is the responsibility of the Member State to demonstrate that the project contributes towards a coherent regional development strategy and that, having regard to the nature and size of the project, it will not result in unacceptable distortions of competition’. Hungary did not provide any information to demonstrate this.
V zvezi s tem smernice navajajo: „Kadar je izjemoma predvidena dodelitev posamične ad hoc pomoči enemu samemu podjetju ali je pomoč omejena na eno področje dejavnosti, mora država članica dokazati, da projekt prispeva h koherentni regionalni razvojni strategiji in da, ob upoštevanju narave in velikosti projekta, ne bo povzročil nesprejemljivega izkrivljanja konkurence.“ Madžarska ni predložila nobenih informacij, da bi to dokazala.
Regional aid map of Hungary approved by the Commission on 13 September 2006 and published in OJ C 256 of 2006.
Madžarska karta regionalnih pomoči, ki jo je 13. septembra 2006 odobrila Komisija in je bila objavljena v UL C 256 iz leta 2006.
Almost the entire territory of Hungary is defined as 107(3)(a) regions, with the exception of Budapest and Pest county, which are 107(3)(c) regions.
Skoraj celotno ozemlje Madžarske je opredeljeno kot regija iz člena 107(3)(a), razen Budimpešte in okrožja Pešta, ki sta regiji iz člena 107(3)(c).
MOL
Družba MOL
One-off payment Since the extension of the mining right had been requested for more than five fields, a one-off payment of HUF 20 billion [25] was also laid down in the agreement [26]. (e)
Enkratno plačilo ker se je podaljšanje rudarske pravice zahtevalo za več kot pet polj, se je s pogodbo [25] določilo enkratno plačilo 20 milijard HUF [26].(e)
Production started after 1 January 2008 Gas fields with an annual production of less than 300m m3 Oil fields with an annual production of less than 50 kt NA
Izkoriščanje rudnin se je začelo po 1. januarju 2008
Production started after 1 January 2008 [44] Gas fields with an annual production of less than 300m m3 Oil fields with an annual production of less than 50 kt NA 12 %
Izkoriščanje rudnin se je začelo po 1. januarju 2008 [44]
The mining company shall pay a charge if an extension is granted. The amount of mineral raw material corresponding to the charge and the percentage of mining fee to be paid in accordance with the value shall be laid down in an agreement concluded between the minister and the mining company at a higher rate than the percentage applied at the time of the application but at no more than 1,2 times the original level.
Organ za rudarstvo odloči o podaljšanju roka.
The decision shall state the value of the payment obligation laid down in the agreement. The mining company may be granted a deadline extension for more than two mining fields at the same time if the application of the increased mining fee for the mining fields in respect of which the deadline has been extended covers all the mining sites of the mining company in an agreement with a duration of at least 5 years.
Rudarski družbi se lahko podaljšanje roka odobri za več kot dve rudni polji hkrati, če zajema uporaba višje rudarske pristojbine za rudna polja, za katera je bil rok podaljšan, vsa rudna nahajališča rudarske družbe iz pogodbe za vsaj pet let.
of 8 February 2011
z dne 8. februarja 2011
concerning a financial contribution by the Union to the Netherlands for studies on Q fever
o finančnem prispevku Unije Nizozemski za študije o mrzlici Q
Having regard to Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 23 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2009/470/ES z dne 25. maja 2009 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1] in zlasti člena 23 Odločbe,
In accordance with Article 75 of the Financial Regulation and Article 90(1) of the Implementing Rules, the commitment of expenditure from the budget of the European Union shall be preceded by a financing decision setting out the essential elements of the action involving expenditure and adopted by the institution or the authorities to which powers have been delegated by the institution.
V skladu s členom 75 finančne uredbe in členom 90(1) izvedbenih pravil mora institucija ali organi, na katere je ta institucija prenesla pooblastila, pred odobritvijo odhodka iz proračuna Evropske unije sprejeti sklep o financiranju, ki določa bistvene sestavine ukrepa, vključno z odhodki.
Q fever is a highly contagious zoonotic disease caused by pathogen Coxiella burnetii which is commonly present in almost all countries worldwide.
Mrzlica Q je zelo nalezljiva zoonoza, ki jo povzroča patogen Coxiella burnetii, običajno prisoten v skoraj vseh državah po svetu.
Many domesticated and wild animals can be carriers of the disease but cattle, goats and sheep are the main reservoirs.
Bolezen lahko prenaša veliko domačih in prostoživečih živali, glavni rezervoarji pa so govedo, koze in ovce.
In the EU, there are no harmonised rules as regards notification or control of Q fever in animals.
V EU ni usklajenih pravil glede prijavljanja ali nadzora mrzlice Q pri živalih.
Disease control measures are normally taken on national, regional or even farm level.
Ukrepi za nadzor bolezni so običajno sprejeti na ravni države, regije ali celo kmetije.
According to the EFSA opinion of 27 April 2010 [4], the overall impact of Q fever on the health of humans and domestic ruminants in EU Member States is limited.
V skladu z mnenjem Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EFSA) z dne 27. aprila 2010 [4] je celoten vpliv mrzlice Q na zdravje ljudi in domačih prežvekovalcev v državah članicah EU omejen.
However, in certain epidemiological circumstances and for particular risk groups the public health impact and thereby also the impact on society and/or the economy can be significant.
Vendar pa je v nekaterih epidemioloških okoliščinah in za določene skupine z visokim tveganjem vpliv na javno zdravje in s tem na družbo in/ali gospodarstvo lahko znaten.
In the years 2008 and 2009, a major increase of human cases of Q fever was observed in the Netherlands, with several human deaths.
V letih 2008 in 2009 je bil na Nizozemskem opažen velik porast mrzlice Q pri ljudeh, z več smrtnimi primeri.
The epidemiological investigations indicated a link with large dairy goat holdings in the area, where this particular type of milk production has developed rapidly over the past decade.
Epidemiološke preiskave so pokazale povezavo med velikimi kmetijskimi gospodarstvi s kozami molznicami na območju, kjer se je ta določena vrsta proizvodnje mleka hitro razvila v zadnjem desetletju.
However, the abovementioned EFSA opinion highlighted that the precise reasons for the emergence of clinical problems in the animal population in 2005, and the increase of cases in the human population in 2007 are still unclear.
Vendar pa je EFSA v navedenem mnenju poudarila, da so natančni razlogi za pojav kliničnih težav pri živalih v letu 2005 in za povečanje števila primerov pri ljudeh v letu 2007 še vedno nejasni.
On 24 March 2010, the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality submitted a request for co-financing in the framework of Decision 2009/470/EC for technical and scientific studies on disease dynamics and the effectiveness of possible control measures applicable to domestic ruminants, such as vaccination of goats.
Nizozemsko ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, naravo in kakovost hrane je 24. marca 2010 v okviru Odločbe 2009/470/ES vložilo prošnjo za sofinanciranje za tehnične in znanstvene študije o dinamiki bolezni in učinkovitosti možnih nadzornih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za domače prežvekovalce, kot je cepljenje koz.
The studies for which the Netherlands has requested co financing for will address among other things the following topics: (i) characterisation of the different genotypes of Coxiella burnetii that exist in different animal species in the Netherlands and their difference in virulence, if any; (ii) pathogenicity of Coxiella burnetii in pregnant and non-pregnant goats; (iii) the survival of Coxiella burnetii in manure; and (iv) suitable means of disinfection.
Študije, za katere je Nizozemska zaprosila za sofinanciranje, bodo med drugim obravnavale naslednje teme: (i) karakterizacijo različnih genotipov bakterije Coxiella burnetii, ki obstajajo pri različnih živalskih vrstah na Nizozemskem, ter njihove razlike po virulenci, če te obstajajo; (ii) patogenost bakterije Coxiella burnetii pri brejih in nebrejih kozah; (iii) preživetje bakterije Coxiella burnetii v gnoju; in iv) ustrezne načine razkuževanja.
Pursuant to Article 22 of Decision 2009/470/EC, the Union may undertake, or assist the Member States or international organisations in undertaking, the technical and scientific measures necessary for the development of EU veterinary legislation and for the development of veterinary education or training.
V skladu s členom 22 Odločbe 2009/470/ES lahko Unija sprejme ali državam članicam ali mednarodnim organizacijam pomaga pri sprejetju tehničnih in znanstvenih ukrepov, potrebnih za razvoj veterinarske zakonodaje EU in za razvoj izobraževanja ali usposabljanja na področju veterine.
A financial contribution should be granted to the studies on Q fever in the Netherlands as the outcomes may lead to new insights that may contribute to possible future development of veterinary legislation in the Union, in particular as regards the possible adoption of harmonised rules on monitoring and reporting of this disease.
Študijam o mrzlici Q na Nizozemskem je treba dodeliti finančni prispevek, saj bi njihovi rezultati lahko pripeljali do novih spoznanj, ki bi lahko prispevali k možnemu prihodnjemu razvoju veterinarske zakonodaje v Uniji, zlasti glede možnega sprejema usklajenih pravil o spremljanju te bolezni in poročanju o njej.
The payment of the financial contribution must be subject to the condition that the studies planned have actually been carried out and that the authorities supply all the necessary information to the Commission.
Plačilo finančnega prispevka se izvede pod pogojem, da so se načrtovane študije dejansko izvedle in da pristojni organi Komisiji zagotovijo vse potrebne informacije.
The Union shall grant the Netherlands financial assistance for their studies on Q fever, as summarised in the Annex.
Unija Nizozemski odobri finančno pomoč za študije o mrzlici Q, kakor je povzeto v Prilogi.
The present Decision constitutes a financing decision in the meaning of Article 75 of the Financial Regulation.
Ta sklep predstavlja odločitev o financiranju v smislu člena 75 finančne uredbe.
the outcomes of the studies must be made available to the Commission and all Member States and presented at the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health;
rezultati študije morajo biti na razpolago Komisiji in vsem državam članicam ter predstavljeni Stalnemu odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali;
the Netherlands must forward a final technical and financial report to the Commission on 31 March 2012 at the latest, the financial report accompanied by supporting documents justifying evidence as to the costs incurred and the results attained.
Nizozemska mora najpozneje do 31. marca 2012 Komisiji predložiti končno tehnično in finančno poročilo, kateremu so priložene dokazilne listine, ki dokazujejo nastale stroške ter dosežene rezultate.
The maximum contribution authorised by this Decision for the costs incurred for the work referred to in Article 1(1) is set at EUR 500000 to be financed from the following Budgetary Line of the General Budget of the European Union for 2011:
Najvišji prispevek, odobren s tem sklepom, za stroške zaradi dela iz člena 1(1), v višini 500000 EUR se financira iz proračunske vrstice splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za leto 2011:
Budgetary Line No 17 04 02 01: EUR 500000.
proračunska vrstica št. 17 04 02 01: 500000 EUR.
The Union’s financial assistance shall be paid following presentation of the reports and supporting documents referred to Article 1(2)(b).
Finančna pomoč Unije se plača po predložitvi poročil in dokazilnih listin iz člena 1(2)(b).
Done at Brussels, 8 February 2011.
V Bruslju, 8. februarja 2011
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW); Scientific Opinion on Q Fever.
Svet za zdravje in zaščito živali (AHAW) EFSA; Znanstveno mnenje o mrzlici Q.
[114 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.159.
[114 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.159.
Description of the technical and scientific studies on the epidemiology of Q fever and the effectiveness of possible control measures applicable to domestic ruminants, referred to in Article 1(1)
Opis tehničnih in znanstvenih študij o epidemiologiji mrzlice Q in učinkovitosti možnih nadzornih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za domače prežvekovalce, iz člena 1(1)
Project 1 ‘Q fever in goats’ involves the cultivation of C. burnetii and the characterisation of C. burnetii of the different genotypes that exist in the Netherlands.
Projekt 1 „Mrzlica Q pri kozah“ vključuje kultivacijo bakterije C. burnetii in karakterizacijo bakterije C. burnetii različnih genotipov, ki obstajajo na Nizozemskem.
It also involves the survival of C. burnetii in manure, the different infection routes, the development of immunity, the shedding of C. burnetii in pregnant and non-pregnant goats and general information on the pathogeneses of C. burnetii.
Prav tako vključuje preživetje bakterije C. burnetii v gnoju, različne poti okužbe, razvoj odpornosti, širjenje bakterije C. burnetii pri brejih in nebrejih kozah ter splošne informacije o patogenezah bakterije C. burnetii.
Project 2 ‘Assessment of the virulence of C. burnetii strains in goats’ addresses the question if the current Dutch strain in goats is more virulent than other C. burnetii strains.
Projekt 2 „Ocena virulence sevov bakterije C. burnetii pri kozah“ obravnava vprašanje, če je trenutni nizozemski sev pri kozah bolj virulenten kot drugi sevi bakterije C. burnetii.