natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing tebufenozide as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances all of which were listed in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC by 31 May 2011 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles provided for in Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to that Directive and taking into account part B of the entry in Annex I to that Directive concerning tebufenozide.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice znova ocenijo vsako registrirano fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje tebufenozid kot edino aktivno snov ali kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, vključenih v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS najpozneje do 31. maja 2011, po enotnih načelih iz Priloge VI k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, na podlagi dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k navedeni direktivi, in ob upoštevanju dela B besedila iz Priloge I k navedeni direktivi o tebufenozidu.
in the case of a product containing tebufenozide as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 at the latest; or
če sredstvo vsebuje tebufenozid kot edino aktivno snov, najpozneje do 31. maja 2015 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo registracijo, ali
in the case of a product containing tebufenozide as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 May 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective directive or directives which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC, whichever is the latest.
če sredstvo vsebuje tebufenozid kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, registracijo po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo najpozneje do 31. maja 2015 ali do datuma, določenega za tako spremembo ali preklic v ustreznih direktivah, s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi dodane v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, pri čemer se upošteva poznejši datum.
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance tebufenozide.
[6] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo tebufenozid.
Summary: EFSA Journal 2010; 8(12): 1871.
Povzetek EFSA Journal 2010; 8(12):1871.
N'-[(4-acetylphenyl)carbonyl]-N-tert-butyl-3,5-dimethylbenzohydrazide.
N’-[(4-acetilfenil)karbonil]-N-tert-butil-3,5-dimetilbenzohidrazid.
4-(2-tert-butyl-2-[(3,5-dimethylphenyl)carbonyl]hydrazinylcarbonyl)benzoic acid.
4-(2-tert-butil-2-[(3,5-dimetilfenil)karbonil]hidrazinilkarbonil)benzojska kislina.
Chemical name not yet identified.
Kemijsko ime še ni določeno.
CAS No: 112410-23-8
št. CAS: 112410-23-8
CIPAC No: 724
št. CIPAC: 724
N-tert-butyl-N′-(4-ethylbenzoyl)-3,5-dimethylbenzohydrazide
N-tert-butyl-N’-(4-ethylbenzoyl)-3,5-dimethylbenzohydrazide
t-butyl hydrazine < 0,001 g/kg
t-butil hidrazin < 0,001 g/kg
For the implementation of the uniform principles of Annex VI, the conclusions of the review report on tebufenozide, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 11 March 2011 shall be taken into account.
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz Priloge VI se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu tebufenozida ter zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali pripravil 11. marca 2011.
pay particular attention to the safety of operators and workers after re-entry and ensure that conditions of authorisation prescribe appropriate protective equipment;
zaščito izvajalcev in delavcev po ponovnem vstopu ter zagotovijo, da se v pogojih registracije predpiše uporaba ustrezne zaščitne opreme;
pay particular attention to the protection of groundwater, when the active substance is applied in regions with vulnerable soil and/or climatic conditions;
zaščito podtalnice, kadar se aktivna snov uporablja na območjih z občutljivimi tlemi in/ali podnebnimi razmerami;
pay particular attention to the protection of aquatic organisms and ensure that conditions of use prescribe adequate mitigation measures;
zaščito vodnih organizmov ter zagotovijo, da pogoji uporabe vključujejo ustrezne ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja;
pay particular attention to the risk to Lepidoptera non-target insects.
tveganju zaradi neciljnih žuželk iz reda Lepidoptera.
The Member States concerned shall request the submission of confirmatory information, as regards:
Zadevne države članice zahtevajo predložitev potrditvenih informacij o:
the relevance of metabolites RH-6595, RH-2651, M2;
pomenu metabolitov RH-6595, RH-2651, M2;
the degradation of tebufenozide in anaerobic soils and soils of alkaline pH.
razgradnji tebufenozida v anaerobnih tleh in tleh z alkalnim pH.
The Member States concerned shall ensure that the applicant submits to the Commission the information set out in points (1) and (2) by 31 May 2013.’
Zadevne države članice zagotovijo, da vlagatelj predloži informacije iz točk (1) in (2) Komisiji do 31. maja 2013.“
Decision 2008/934/EC provides for the non-inclusion of tebufenozide and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance by 31 December 2011.
Odločba 2008/934/ES določa nevključitev tebufenozida in preklic registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov, do 31. decembra 2011.
It is necessary to delete the line concerning tebufenozide in the Annex to that Decision.
V Prilogi k navedeni odločbi je treba črtati vrstico o tebufenozidu.
[120 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1871.
[120 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1871.
Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2011/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
of 8 June 2011
z dne 8. junija 2011
on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010
o upraviteljih alternativnih investicijskih skladov in spremembah direktiv 2003/41/ES in 2009/65/ES ter uredb (ES) št. 1060/2009 in (EU) št. 1095/2010
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 53(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 53(1) Pogodbe,
Managers of alternative investment funds (AIFMs) are responsible for the management of a significant amount of invested assets in the Union, account for significant amounts of trading in markets for financial instruments, and can exercise an important influence on markets and companies in which they invest.
Upravitelji alternativnih investicijskih skladov (UAIS) so odgovorni za upravljanje velikega zneska naloženih sredstev v Uniji in za velike zneske trgovanja na trgih finančnih instrumentov ter lahko pomembno vplivajo na trge in družbe, v katere vlagajo.
The impact of AIFMs on the markets in which they operate is largely beneficial, but recent financial difficulties have underlined how the activities of AIFMs may also serve to spread or amplify risks through the financial system.
Vpliv UAIS na trge, na katerih delujejo, je v veliki meri koristen, vendar pa so nedavne finančne težave pokazale, kako lahko dejavnosti UAIS tudi razširijo ali povečajo tveganja v finančnem sistemu.
Uncoordinated national responses make the efficient management of those risks difficult.
Zaradi neusklajenih nacionalnih odzivov postane učinkovito upravljanje teh tveganj težavno.
This Directive therefore aims at establishing common requirements governing the authorisation and supervision of AIFMs in order to provide a coherent approach to the related risks and their impact on investors and markets in the Union.
Zato je cilj te direktive vzpostaviti skupne zahteve za ureditev dovoljenj in nadzora nad UAIS, in sicer z namenom zagotoviti skladen pristop k povezanim tveganjem in njihovemu učinku na vlagatelje in trge v Uniji.
Recent difficulties in financial markets have underlined that many AIFM strategies are vulnerable to some or several important risks in relation to investors, other market participants and markets.
Nedavne težave na finančnih trgih so pokazale, da je veliko strategij UAIS ranljivih za nekaj oziroma več pomembnih tveganj v zvezi z vlagatelji, drugimi udeleženci na trgu in samimi trgi.
In order to provide comprehensive and common arrangements for supervision, it is necessary to establish a framework capable of addressing those risks taking into account the diverse range of investment strategies and techniques employed by AIFMs.
Da bi zagotovili celovito in skupno ureditev nadzora, je treba vzpostaviti okvir za obravnavo teh tveganj, ob upoštevanju raznolikosti naložbenih strategij in tehnik, ki jih uporabljajo UAIS.
Consequently, this Directive should apply to AIFMs managing all types of funds that are not covered by Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) [4], irrespective of the legal or contractual manner in which the AIFMs are entrusted with this responsibility.
Zato bi se morala ta direktiva uporabljati za UAIS, ki upravljajo vse vrste skladov, ki jih ne ureja Direktiva 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP) [4], ne glede na pravni ali pogodbeni način, na katerega je UAIS zaupana ta odgovornost.
AIFMs should not be entitled to manage UCITS within the meaning of Directive 2009/65/EC on the basis of an authorisation under this Directive.
UAIS ne bi smeli imeti pravice do upravljanja KNPVP v smislu Direktive 2009/65/ES, na podlagi dovoljenja v skladu s to direktivo.
This Directive aims to provide for an internal market for AIFMs and a harmonised and stringent regulatory and supervisory framework for the activities within the Union of all AIFMs, including those which have their registered office in a Member State (EU AIFMs) and those which have their registered office in a third country (non-EU AIFMs).
Cilj te direktive je zagotoviti notranji trg za UAIS ter usklajen in strog regulativni in nadzorni okvir za dejavnosti vseh UAIS v Uniji, tako za UAIS z registriranim sedežem v državi članici (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EU UAIS) tudi za UAIS z registriranim sedežem v tretji državi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ne-EU UAIS).
As the practical consequences and possible difficulties resulting from a harmonised regulatory framework and an internal market for non-EU AIFMs performing management and/or marketing activities within the Union and EU AIFMs managing non-EU alternative investment funds (AIFs), are uncertain and difficult to predict due to the lack of previous experience in this regard, a review mechanism should be provided for.
Ker so praktične posledice in morebitne težave usklajenega regulativnega okvira in notranjega trga za ne-EU UAIS, ki izvajajo upravljanje in/ali dejavnosti trženja v Uniji in EU UAIS, ki upravljajo ne-EU alternativne investicijske sklade (v nadaljnjem besedilu: AIS), negotove in jih je težko predvideti, saj v zvezi s tem primanjkuje predhodnih izkušenj, bi bilo treba zagotoviti mehanizem v zvezi s pregledom delovanja.
It is intended that, after a transitional period of 2 years, a harmonised passport regime become applicable to non-EU AIFMs performing management and/or marketing activities within the Union and EU AIFMs managing non-EU AIFs after the entry into force of a delegated act by the Commission in this regard.
Predvideno je, da se po sprejetju delegiranega akta Komisije v ta namen, po prehodnem obdobju dveh let začne uporabljati usklajen režim enotne licence za ne-EU UAIS, ki izvajajo upravljanje in/ali dejavnost trženja v Uniji, in za EU UAIS, ki upravljajo ne-EU AIS.
It is intended that the harmonised regime, during a further transitional period of 3 years, co-exist with the national regimes of the Member States subject to certain minimum harmonised conditions.
Predvideno je, da bo usklajeni režim v nadaljnjem prehodnem obdobju treh let veljal vzporedno z nacionalnimi režimi držav članic ob upoštevanju nekaterih minimalnih usklajenih pogojev.
After that 3-year period of co-existence, it is intended that the national regimes be brought to an end on the entry into force of a further delegated act by the Commission.
Po tem tri letnem obdobju vzporednega delovanja režimov, je predvideno, da bodo nacionalni režimi z začetkom veljavnosti nadaljnjega delegiranega akta Komisije prenehali veljati.
4 years after the deadline for transposition of this Directive, the Commission should review the application and the scope of this Directive taking into account its objectives and should assess whether or not the Union harmonised approach has caused any ongoing major market disruption and whether or not this Directive functions effectively in light of the principles of the internal market and of a level playing field.
Komisija bi morala štiri leta po dokončnem roku za prenos te direktive ob upoštevanju njenih ciljev opraviti pregled izvajanja in področja uporabe te direktive ter oceniti, ali je usklajeni pristop Unije povzročil kakršno koli trajno izkrivljenost trga ali ne, in ali ta direktiva deluje učinkovito ali ne v luči načel notranjega trga in enakih pogojev.
The scope of this Directive should be limited to entities managing AIFs as a regular business – regardless of whether the AIF is of an open-ended or a closed-ended type, whatever the legal form of the AIF, and whether or not the AIF is listed – which raise capital from a number of investors with a view to investing that capital for the benefit of those investors in accordance with a defined investment policy.
Področje uporabe te direktive bi moralo biti omejeno na subjekte, ki zberejo kapital več vlagateljev z namenom vlaganja tega kapitala v skladu z opredeljeno naložbeno politiko v korist teh vlagateljev in katerih redna dejavnost je upravljanje AIS, ne glede na to, ali je AIS odprtega ali zaprtega tipa, kakšna je pravna oblika AIS in ali AIS kotira na borzi ali ne.
Investment undertakings, such as family office vehicles which invest the private wealth of investors without raising external capital, should not be considered to be AIFs in accordance with this Directive.
Naložbeni podjemi, kot so podjetja, ki upravljajo premoženje premožnejših družin, ki vlagajo zasebno premoženje vlagateljev brez zbiranja zunanjega kapitala, se ne bi smeli obravnavati kot AIS v skladu s to direktivo.
The entities not considered to be AIFMs pursuant to this Directive fall outside its scope.
Subjekti, ki se ne obravnavajo kot UAIS na podlagi te direktive, ne spadajo v njeno področje uporabe.
As a consequence, this Directive should not apply to holding companies as defined herein.
Zato se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati za holdinge, kot so v njej opredeljeni.
However, managers of private equity funds or AIFMs managing AIFs whose shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market should not be excluded from its scope.
Vendar pa upravitelji skladov zasebnega kapitala ali UAIS, ki upravljajo AIS katerih deleži so sprejeti v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu, ne bi smeli biti izključeni iz njenega področja uporabe.
Further, this Directive should not apply to the management of pension funds; employee participation or savings schemes; supranational institutions; national central banks; national, regional and local governments and bodies or institutions which manage funds supporting social security and pension systems; securitisation special purpose entities; or insurance contracts and joint ventures.
Poleg tega se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati za upravljanje pokojninskih skladov; sheme soodločanja delavcev ali varčevalne sheme; nadnacionalne institucije, nacionalne centralne banke; nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne vlade in telesa ali institucije, ki upravljajo sklade, ki podpirajo sisteme socialne varnosti in pokojninske sisteme; posebne instrumente listinjenja ali za zavarovalne pogodbe in skupna podjetja.
Investment firms authorised under Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments [5] and credit institutions authorised under Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions [6] should not be required to obtain an authorisation under this Directive in order to provide investment services such as individual portfolio management in respect of AIFs.
Od investicijskih podjetij z dovoljenjem na podlagi Direktive 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov [5] ter kreditnih institucij z dovoljenjem na podlagi Direktive 2006/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij [6] se ne bi smelo zahtevati, da naj za opravljanje investicijskih storitev, kot je individualno upravljanje premoženja v zvezi z AIS, pridobijo dovoljenje v skladu s to direktivo.
However, investment firms should be able, directly or indirectly, to offer units or shares of an AIF to, or place such units or shares with, investors in the Union only to the extent that the units or shares can be marketed in accordance with this Directive.
Kljub temu bi morala biti v zvezi z AIS investicijska podjetja zmožna samo neposredno ali posredno ponuditi enote ali deleže AIS vlagateljem v Uniji ali jih plasirati, če in dokler se te enote ali deleži lahko tržijo v skladu s to direktivo.
When transposing this Directive into national law, the Member States should take into account the regulatory purpose of that requirement and should ensure that investment firms established in a third country that, pursuant to the relevant national law, can provide investment services in respect of AIFs also fall within the scope of that requirement.
Države članice bi morale ob prenosu te direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo upoštevati regulativni namen te zahteve in zagotoviti, da bi ta zahteva veljala tudi za investicijska podjetja s sedežem v tretji državi, ki lahko na podlagi zadevne nacionalne zakonodaje opravljajo investicijske storitve v zvezi z AIS.
The provision of investment services by those entities in respect of AIFs should never amount to a de facto circumvention of this Directive by means of turning the AIFM into a letter-box entity, irrespective of whether the AIFM is established in the Union or in a third country.
Investicijske storitve, ki jih opravljajo ti subjekti v zvezi AIS, nikoli ne bi smele privesti do dejanskega izogibanja določbam te direktive, tako da bi se vloga UAIS zmanjšala na vlogo poštnega predala, ne glede na to, ali je UAIS ustanovljen v Uniji ali v tretji državi.
This Directive does not regulate AIFs.
Ta direktiva ne ureja AIS.
AIFs should therefore be able to continue to be regulated and supervised at national level.
Zato bi bilo treba AIS še naprej urejati in nadzirati na nacionalni ravni.
It would be disproportionate to regulate the structure or composition of the portfolios of AIFs managed by AIFMs at Union level and it would be difficult to provide for such extensive harmonisation due to the very diverse types of AIFs managed by AIFMs.
Urejanje strukture ali sestave premoženja AIS, ki jih upravljajo UAIS na ravni Unije, bi bilo nesorazmerno, in bi bilo zaradi velike raznolikosti AIS, ki jih upravljajo UAIS, težko zagotoviti tako obširno uskladitev.
This Directive therefore does not prevent Member States from adopting or from continuing to apply national requirements in respect of AIFs established in their territory.
Ta direktiva zato državam članicam ne preprečuje sprejetja ali nadaljnje uporabe nacionalnih zahtev v zvezi z AIS s sedežem na njihovem ozemlju.
The fact that a Member State may impose requirements additional to those applicable in other Member States on AIFs established in its territory should not prevent the exercise of rights of AIFMs authorised in accordance with this Directive in other Member States to market to professional investors in the Union certain AIFs established outside the Member State imposing additional requirements and which are therefore not subject to and do not need to comply with those additional requirements.
Dejstvo, da lahko država članica AIS, ki je ustanovljen na njenem ozemlju naloži zahteve dodatne tistim zahtevam, ki se uporabljajo v drugih državah članicah, ne bi smelo preprečevati izvajanja pravic UAIS, ki imajo v skladu s to direktivo dovoljenje, da v drugih državah članicah tržijo profesionalnim vlagateljem v Uniji nekatere AIS, ki so ustanovljeni zunaj države članice, ki nalaga dodatne zahteve in za katere zaradi tega ne veljajo dodatne zahteve in jim jih ni treba upoštevati.
Several provisions of this Directive require AIFMs to ensure compliance with requirements for which, in some fund structures, AIFMs are not responsible.
Več določb te direktive zahteva od UAIS, da zagotovijo skladnost z zahtevami, za katere v nekaterih strukturah skladov UAIS niso odgovorni.
An example of such fund structures is where the responsibility for appointing the depositary rests with the AIF or another entity acting on behalf of the AIF.
Tovrsten primer so strukture skladov, v katerih ima odgovornost za imenovanje depozitarja AIS ali drug subjekt, ki deluje v imenu AIS.
In such cases, the AIFM has no ultimate control over whether a depositary is in fact appointed unless the AIF is internally managed.
V takih primerih UAIS nima končnega vpliva nad tem, ali je depozitar dejansko imenovan, razen če ima AIS notranjega upravitelja.
Since this Directive does not regulate AIFs, it cannot require an AIF to appoint a depositary.
Glede na to, da ta direktiva ne ureja AIS, ne more zahtevati, da AIS imenuje depozitarja.
In cases of failure of an AIFM to ensure compliance with the applicable requirements of an AIF or another entity on its behalf, the competent authorities should require the AIFM to take the necessary steps to remedy the situation.
Če UAIS ne bi uspelo zagotoviti izpolnjevanja veljavnih zahtev AIS ali drugega subjekta, ki deluje v njegovem imenu, bi morali pristojni organi zahtevati, da UAIS z ustreznimi ukrepi popravi to stanje.
If, despite such steps, the non-compliance persists, and in so far as it concerns an EU AIFM or an authorised non-EU AIFM managing an EU AIF, the AIFM should resign as manager of that AIF.
Če kljub tem ukrepom UAIS še vedno ne izpolnjuje zahtev in če to zadeva EU UAIS ali ne-EU UAIS z dovoljenjem za upravljanje EU AIS, bi moral UAIS odstopiti s položaja upravitelja tega AIS.
If the AIFM fails to resign, the competent authorities of its home Member State should require such resignation and the marketing in the Union of the AIF concerned should no longer be permitted.
Če UAIS tega ne bi storil, pa bi morali pristojni organi matične države članice zahtevati, da odstopi, trženje zadevnega AIS v Uniji pa ne bi smelo biti več dovoljeno.
The same prohibition should apply to authorised non-EU AIFMs marketing non-EU AIFs in the Union.
Ista prepoved bi morala veljati za ne-EU UAIS z dovoljenjem za trženje ne-EU AIS v Uniji.
Unless specifically provided for otherwise, where this Directive refers to the interests of the investors of an AIF the investors’ interests in their specific capacity as investors of the AIF, and not their individual interests, are envisaged.
Kadar se ta direktiva sklicuje na interes vlagateljev v AIS in če ni izrecno drugače določeno, se sklicuje na interese vlagateljev v njihovi posebni vlogi vlagateljev v AIS in ne njihove posamezne interese.