natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission notes that this issue has not been finally resolved, even though provisional compensation has been paid.
Komisija ugotavlja, da to vprašanje ni bilo dokončno rešeno, čeprav so bila izplačana začasna nadomestila.
Second, the Commission notes that, in the context of the public transport service contract for 2005-14, the consequences of the delays were, on the contrary, taken into account in the calculation of the contractual payments.
Drugič, Komisija v okviru pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe prevoza za obdobje 2005–2014 ugotavlja, da so se, nasprotno, posledice zamud upoštevale pri izračunu pogodbenih plačil.
The Danish authorities have demonstrated how the mechanism for adjusting the contractual payments operated in relation to the delays in delivery and according to the type of rolling stock concerned.
Danski organi so prikazali, kako deluje mehanizem prilagoditve pogodbenih plačil glede na zamude pri dobavi in vrsto zadevnega voznega parka.
The Commission notes that the contractual payments were reduced by DKK 645 million over the first 2 years of the contract.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so se pogodbena plačila zmanjšala za 645 milijonov DKK v prvih dveh letih trajanja pogodbe.
It therefore considers that the late delivery of the rolling stock did not result in any overcompensation under that public transport service contract.
Tako meni, da zamude pri dobavi voznega parka niso privedle do čezmernega nadomestila v okviru te pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
Third, the Commission notes that the replacement rented rolling stock was the subject of additional contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and DSB.
Tretjič, Komisija ugotavlja, da so bile za najeti nadomestni vozni park sklenjene dodatne pogodbe med danskim ministrstvom za promet in družbo DSB.
It points out that DSB was not obliged, under the public transport service contracts, to use replacement rolling stock.
Opozarja, da na podlagi pogodb o izvajanju javne službe prevoza družbi DSB ni bilo treba uporabiti nadomestnega voznega parka.
The Commission notes that these additional contracts were concluded to deal with a new situation which had not been taken into account in the contracts, namely the consequences of the late delivery of the new trains.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so bile te dodatne pogodbe odziv na nov položaj, ki se ni upošteval v pogodbah, in sicer na posledice zamude pri dobavi novih vlakov.
It therefore considers that the compensation paid to DSB covered new obligations of the rail operator and, consequently, was not liable to result in overcompensation under the public transport service contracts.
Tako meni, da so nadomestila, izplačana družbi DSB, ustrezala novim obveznostim železniškega prevoznika in zato niso mogla povzročiti čezmernih nadomestil v okviru pogodb o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
The Commission points out in this respect that if the settlement procedures (out of court, by arbitration or by litigation) between DSB and Ansaldobreda concerning the delays in delivery lead to the recognition of certain losses for DSB, if those losses concern the use of hired replacement rolling stock and if compensation is paid by Ansaldobreda to cover these, such compensation will have to be paid back to the Danish State because it bore the cost via the additional contracts.
Komisija glede tega pojasnjuje, da če postopki poravnave (sporazumne, arbitražne ali sodne) med družbama DSB in AnsaldoBreda v zvezi z zamudami pri dobavi privedejo do priznanja določene škode za družbo DSB, če se ta škoda nanaša na uporabo najetega nadomestnega voznega parka in če so v ta namen določena nadomestila, ki jih plača AnsaldoBreda, bodo morala biti ta nadomestila nakazana državi, ker je prevzela stroške s sklenitvijo dodatnih pogodb.
The Commission considers it necessary to impose a condition in this respect on the Danish State.
Komisiji se zdi potrebno, da se Danski določi tak pogoj.
In the light of the above, the Commission concludes that DSB received overcompensation of DKK 104 million on account of the late delivery of the rolling stock provided for in the public transport service contracts.
Komisija na podlagi zgornjega sklepa, da je DSB prejela čezmerno nadomestilo v višini 104 milijonov DKK zaradi zamud pri dobavi voznega parka, določenega v pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
The Commission considers, however, that the effects of that overcompensation were avoided by the collection of dividends as described previously.
Komisija vseeno meni, da so bili učinki tega čezmernega nadomestila preprečeni z izplačilom dividend, kot je opisano zgoraj.
The additional dividends collected by the Danish State remain generally greater than all of the surplus profits plus the amount relating to the late delivery of rolling stock.
Dodatne dividende, ki jih je prejela država, namreč ostajajo višje od celotnega presežka dobička, povečanega za ta znesek, ki se nanaša na zamude pri dobavi voznega parka.
The Commission therefore concludes that DSB did not receive any overcompensation in practice.
Komisija tako ugotavlja, da DSB dejansko ni prejela čezmernega nadomestila.
In its decision initiating the procedure, the Commission expressed specific doubts regarding whether DSB could have received an advantage for operating this particular line.
Komisija je v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka izrazila poseben dvom o tem, da je družbi DSB lahko bila podeljena prednost za opravljanje prevoza na tej posebni progi.
The Commission examined two aspects here.
Glede tega je preučila dva vidika.
First, the Commission checked that, for the period 2000-04, DSB had not received any financial support in the form of aid under the public transport service contract even where the link was operated without a public service obligation.
Po eni strani je Komisija preverila, da DSB za obdobje 2000–2004 ni prejela finančne pomoči v obliki subvencij na podlagi pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe prevoza tudi v tistih primerih, ko prevoz na tej povezavi ni bil opravljen v okviru obveznosti javne službe.
They have also indicated that that specific contract did not provide for any additional compensation for DSB from the Danish State for the operation of the line between 2002 and 2004.
Navedli so tudi, da v tej posebni pogodbi ni bilo določeno dodatno nadomestilo, ki bi ga država izplačala družbi DSB za opravljanje prevoza na tej progi med letoma 2002 in 2004.
The Danish authorities have therefore established that the rail line between Copenhagen and Ystad did not receive any public financing before 2005.
Danski organi so tako dokazali, da železniška proga med Köbenhavnom in Ystadom ni bila predmet javnega financiranja pred letom 2005.
The Commission notes that the inclusion of that line in the ‘public traffic’ scheme between 2002 and 2004 without additional compensation compared with the compensation paid under the public transport service contract with DSB for the period 2002-04 is not liable to result in overcompensation.
Komisija opozarja, da vključitev te proge v sistem „javnega prometa“ med letoma 2002 in 2004 brez dodatnega nadomestila v primerjavi z nadomestili, izplačanimi v okviru pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe prevoza, sklenjene z družbo DSB za obdobje 2000–2004, ne more povzročiti čezmernega nadomestila.
Its inclusion in the public transport traffic scheme had the result of expanding DSB’s obligations without increasing the contractual payments.
Posledica njene vključitve v sistem javnega prometa so namreč bile večje obveznosti družbe DSB brez povečanja pogodbenih plačil.
It also meant the inclusion of the revenues from that line in DSB’s overall revenues in respect of its public service activities.
Ta vključitev je pomenila tudi, da so bili prihodki od te proge vključeni v vse prihodke družbe DSB od njenih dejavnosti javne službe.
The Commission notes, however, that the line was loss-making in 2002 and that it was precisely for that reason that it was included in the ‘public traffic’ scheme.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je ta proga leta 2002 prinesla izgubo in da je bila prav zato vključena v sistem „javnega prometa“.
That inclusion is consequently not liable to result in overcompensation.
Ta vključitev zato ne more povzročiti čezmernega nadomestila.
In any event, the Commission considers that, if the line had been making a profit, the revenues specific to that line would have increased DSB’s total revenues in respect of its public service activities.
Čeprav bi proga morala biti donosna, Komisija v vsakem primeru meni, da bi posebni prihodki od te proge povečali vse prihodke družbe DSB od njene dejavnosti javne službe.
Second, the Commission has examined DSB’s costs for the entire Copenhagen-Bornholm route and, in particular, how account was taken of the ferry crossing between Ystad and Rønne [53] in the combined tickets for its passengers.
Po drugi strani je Komisija preučila stroške družbe DSB na celotni poti Köbenhavn–Bornholm in zlasti upoštevanje trajektne povezave med Ystadom in Rönnejem [53] v skupnih vozovnicah za njene potnike.
The Commission points out that the sea link between these two ports is operated by Bornholmtrafikken A/S, a public undertaking, on the basis of a contract concluded with the Danish State following a tendering procedure.
Komisija opozarja, da pomorsko povezavo med tema pristaniščema zagotavlja javno podjetje Bornholmtrafikken A/S na podlagi pogodbe, ki jo je z državo sklenilo po javnem razpisu.
The Danish authorities have clarified the obligations of Bornholmtrafikken A/S under that contract, particularly in terms of coordination of departure and arrival times with bus or train operators.
Danski organi so pojasnili obveznosti, ki jih ima Bornholmtrafikken A/S na podlagi te pogodbe, zlasti glede usklajevanja voznih redov z avtobusnimi ali železniškimi prevozniki.
They have also specified that no obligation was laid down in the area of pricing policy apart from the fixing of minimum fares.
Pojasnili so tudi, da ni bila določena nobena obveznost glede tarifne politike, razen določitve najnižjih tarif.
In the light of the information provided by the Danish authorities, the Commission notes that the prices charged by Bornholmtrafikken A/S are identical in relation to DSB and Gråhundbus.
Komisija na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili danski organi, ugotavlja, da so cene, ki jih zaračunava Bornholmtrafikken A/S, enake cenam, ki jih zaračunavata DSB in Grahundbus.
The only fare which applies to DSB alone is the special price for DSB Orange including the crossing of the Great Belt.
Edina tarifa, ki se uporablja le za DSB, je posebna cena za DSB Orange, ki vključuje prečkanje Velikega Belta.
However, that fare is in line with specific commercial objectives of Bornholmtrafikken A/S in so far as the DSB Orange programme attracts travellers from Jutland to Bornholm.
Ta tarifa vseeno izpolnjuje posebne poslovne cilje Bornholmtrafikken A/S, ker program DSB Orange omogoča privabljanje potnikov, ki z Jutlanda potujejo na Bornholm.
That particular fare is made available on specific conditions (it only applies on certain trains, Internet-based reservation system, limited number of tickets, etc.) and relates to different services from those offered by bus operators on that line.
Pridobitev te posebne tarife izpolnjuje natančno določene pogoje (nanaša se le na določene vlake, spletni rezervacijski sistem, omejeno število vozovnic itd.) in se nanaša na drugačne storitve, kot jih na tej progi ponujajo avtobusni prevozniki.
The Commission notes that only a very small number of passengers took advantage of this offer and that it was withdrawn in 2009.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je ta ponudba zadevala le zelo omejeno število potnikov in da leta 2009 ni bila več na voljo.
The Commission therefore considers that the prices charged for this ferry trip by Bornholmtrafikken A/S did not confer an advantage on DSB compared with its competitors which offer a bus connection and also apply combined billing.
Komisija zato meni, da cene, ki jih je Bornholmtrafikken A/S zaračunaval za ta trajektni prevoz, niso ustvarile prednosti za družbo DSB v primerjavi z njenimi konkurenti, ki ponujajo avtobusno povezavo in tudi uporabljajo integrirano zaračunavanje.
The Commission is therefore of the opinion that the billing of the ferry connections did not result in overcompensation for DSB.
Torej meni, da zaračunavanje trajektnih povezav ni privedlo do čezmernih nadomestil za DSB.
On the whole, the Commission therefore considers that the public service compensation in question was calculated in accordance with the rules laid down in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Skratka, Komisija torej meni, da so bila zadevna nadomestila za javne storitve izračunana v skladu s pravili, določenimi v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 1370/2007.
Consequently, the Commission concludes that the State aid contained in the contractual payments paid under the public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and DSB is compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 implementing Article 93 of the TFEU.
Komisija zato sklepa, da je državna pomoč, ki jo zajemajo pogodbena plačila, izplačana v okviru pogodb o izvajanju javne službe prevoza, ki sta ju sklenila dansko ministrstvo za promet in družba DSB, združljiva z notranjim trgom na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007, s katero se izvaja člen 93 PDEU.
EFFECT OF CERTAIN FISCAL MEASURES ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPENSATION
VPLIV NEKATERIH DAVČNIH UKREPOV NA ZDRUŽLJIVOST NADOMESTIL ZA JAVNE STORITVE
In its decision initiating the procedure, the Commission noted that Danish private undertakings operating in VAT-exempt sectors such as the public transport sector are subject to a special payroll tax (‘lønskat’).
Komisija je v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka ugotovila, da za danska zasebna podjetja, ki delujejo v sektorjih, oproščenih DDV, kot je sektor javnega prevoza, velja sistem posebnega davka na izplačane plače („lönskat“).
It was noted, however, that public undertakings such as DSB were not subject to the tax.
Vseeno je ugotovila, da javna podjetja, kot je DSB, niso bila zavezana za plačilo tega davka.
Although DKT, the second complainant, claimed that DSB’s exemption from the payroll tax could give it a competitive advantage, the Commission did not examine the issue of payroll tax because it was the subject of a general examination by the Commission in the context of a separate procedure [54].
Čeprav je združenje DKT, drugi pritožnik, trdilo, da bi družba DSB zaradi oprostitve plačila tega davka na izplačane plače lahko imela konkurenčno prednost, Komisija ni preučila vprašanja davka na izplačane plače, ker je bilo to vprašanje predmet splošne preiskave Komisije v ločenem postopku. [54] Tudi sam pritožnik je navedel parlamentarno vprašanje in odgovor, ki ga je v imenu Komisije dala Neelie Kroes.
By letter of 9 June 2009, the Commission informed DKT that, after examining the measures in question, it had decided to close the procedure referred to above.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 9. junija 2009 obvestila DKT, da se je po preiskavi zadevnih ukrepov odločila končati zgoraj omenjeni postopek.
The Commission stated that discussions and exchanges of information had taken place between the Commission and the Danish authorities in order to obtain clarification regarding the potential problems and ambiguities arising from the tax exemption from the perspective of the rules on State aid.
Komisija je namreč navedla, da je razpravljala in izmenjala informacije z danskimi organi, da bi dobila pojasnila o morebitnih težavah in dvoumnostih, ki izhajajo iz te oprostitve, glede na pravila o državni pomoči.
In this context, the Danish authorities agreed to amend their legislation.
Danski organi so v tem okviru pristali na spremembo svoje zakonodaje.
The Commission therefore notes that Denmark has adopted Act No 526 of 25 June 2008, which eliminates any potential distortion between public and private undertakings with regard to the implementation of the payroll tax.
Komisija tako ugotavlja, da je Danska sprejela zakon št. 526 z dne 25. junija 2008, s katerim je odpravila vsako morebitno izkrivljanje med javnimi in zasebnimi podjetji z vidika izvajanja davka na izplačane plače.
It also points out that that Act entered into force on 1 January 2009 and that DSB has been subject to payroll tax since that date.
Ugotavlja še, da je ta zakon začel veljati 1. januarja 2009 in da je družba DSB od takrat zavezana za plačilo davka na izplačane plače.
For the purposes of this examination, the Commission points out that DSB’s exemption from that tax was included in the parameters used in determining the level of DSB’s contractual payments under the public transport service contracts, as indicated in recital 88 of this Decision.
Komisija za potrebe te preiskave opozarja, da je bila oprostitev plačila tega davka, odobrena družbi DSB, vključena v parametre, na podlagi katerih je bila določena raven pogodbenih plačil za to družbo v okviru pogodb o izvajanju javne službe prevoza, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 88 tega sklepa.
The Commission notes that the tax exemption reduced DSB’s operating costs connected with the transport services provided for in the public transport service contracts.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so se zaradi oprostitve tega davka znižali operativni stroški, ki jih ima DSB zaradi opravljanja prevoznih storitev, določenih v pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
It therefore observes that, in the absence of an exemption, the Danish State would have to increase the amount of its contractual payments accordingly.
Zato ugotavlja, da bi morala Danska zaradi neobstoja oprostitve za toliko povečati znesek svojih pogodbenih plačil.
Consequently, the Commission considers that, even if DSB’s payroll tax exemption were to constitute State aid, that aid would have to be treated in the same way as ‘additional contractual payments’ of an amount equivalent to the tax burden from which the company was exempt.
Komisija zato meni, da čeprav bi oprostitev plačila davka na izplačane plače, odobrena družbi DSB, morala pomeniti državno pomoč, bi morala biti ta pomoč izenačena z „dodatnimi pogodbenimi plačili“ v znesku, enakovrednem oproščeni davčni obremenitvi.
In that event, the Commission observes that these ‘additional contractual payments’ would not result in overcompensation for DSB.
Komisija v tem primeru ugotavlja, da ta „dodatna pogodbena plačila“ ne bi povzročila čezmernih nadomestil za DSB.
The Commission notes, moreover, that DSB has been subject to payroll tax as from 1 January 2009.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je DSB od 1. januarja 2009 zavezana za plačilo davka na izplačane plače.
DSB’s tax burden has increased as a result, which has an impact on its operating costs incurred in connection with the transport services provided for in the public transport service contracts.
Zato so se davčne obremenitve te družbe povečale, kar vpliva na njene operativne stroške, potrebne za opravljanje prevoznih storitev, določenih v pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
The Danish authorities have indicated that the additional expenditure incurred by DSB will be compensated to take account of this change in the parameters used to calculate the contractual payments.
Danski organi so navedli, da bodo dodatni stroški, ki jih bo imela DSB, nadomeščeni zaradi upoštevanja te spremembe v parametrih za izračun pogodbenih plačil.
In this respect, the Commission considers that the compensation of the additional tax costs resulting from the end of DSB’s tax exemption must be seen in conjunction with the overall economic aspects of the compensation system for public transport service contracts.
Komisija glede tega meni, da je nadomestilo dodatnih davčnih stroškov zaradi odprave davčne oprostitve za družbo DSB del splošne strukture sistema nadomestil za pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
The Commission has examined whether that compensation corresponded solely to the additional tax burden borne by DSB in respect of its public service activities.
Komisija je preučila, ali to nadomestilo strogo ustreza dodatni davčni obremenitvi, ki jo ima DSB izključno zaradi svojih dejavnosti javne službe.
Consequently, the Commission concludes that the compensation from the Danish State for the payroll tax that DSB has subsequently been required to pay does not result in overcompensation and should therefore be regarded as compatible with the internal market under Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
Komisija zato sklepa, da dansko nadomestilo za davek na izplačane plače, ki ga DSB zdaj plačuje, ne pomeni čezmernega nadomestila in ga je treba tako šteti za združljivega z notranjim trgom na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007.
The Commission takes the view that the public transport service contracts concluded between the Danish Ministry of Transport and DSB constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Komisija meni, da pogodbi o izvajanju javne službe prevoza, ki sta ju sklenila dansko ministrstvo za promet in družba DSB, pomenita državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The Commission concludes, however, that that aid is compatible with the internal market under Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, subject to Denmark’s introduction into the current public transport service contracts of the refund mechanism described in recitals 222 to 240 and 356 of this Decision.
Komisija vseeno ugotavlja, da je ta pomoč združljiva z notranjim trgom na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007, pod pogojem, da Danska v veljavne pogodbe o izvajanju javne službe prevoza uvede mehanizem vračila, opisan v uvodnih izjavah od 222 do 240 in 356 tega sklepa.
In those circumstances, the aid in question is compatible until the expiry of the current public transport service contracts.
Zadevna pomoč bo pod temi pogoji združljiva do izteka veljavnih pogodb o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
The assessment of the compatibility of the aid concerned in this Decision was carried out on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, which is applicable at the time when the Commission takes its decision.
Ocena združljivosti pomoči, ki je predmet tega sklepa, je bila opravljena na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007, ki se uporablja, ko Komisija sprejema odločitev.
The Commission notes that the assessment rules in Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 correspond in terms of content to those in Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, as set out and interpreted by the Commission in its decision initiating the procedure.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so pravila o oceni iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007v bistvu podobna pravilom v Uredbi (EGS) št. 1191/69, kot jih je Komisija predstavila in razlagala v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka.
It observes that, in the present case, the application of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 would not have led to a different conclusion.
Ugotavlja namreč, da uporaba Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69 v tej zadevi ne bi privedla do drugačnega sklepa.
Finally, the aid concerned is compatible until the expiry of the current public transport service contracts.
Nazadnje, zadevna pomoč je združljiva do izteka veljavnih pogodb o izvajanju javne službe prevoza.
The contracts were concluded in 2004, that is to say as from 26 July 2000 and before 3 December 2009, on the basis of a procedure other than a fair competitive tendering procedure and for a term of 10 years.
Gre namreč za pogodbi, ki sta bili sklenjeni leta 2004, to je od 26. julija 2000 in pred 3. decembrom 2009, brez pravičnega in za javnost odprtega razpisnega postopka in za obdobje desetih let.
The aid therefore comes pursuant to Article 8(3)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, first paragraph, and the last point of the last paragraph.
Torej se zanju uporabljata prvi odstavek in zadnja točka zadnjega odstavka člena 8(3)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007.
The Commission points out however that, in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, Member States are to take measures to gradually comply with the rules on the award of those contracts in accordance with the rules in Article 5 before 3 December 2019,
Komisija vseeno opozarja, da morajo države članice v skladu s členom 8(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007sprejeti ukrepe za postopno uskladitev s pravili o sklepanju navedenih pogodb v skladu s pravili iz člena 5 pred 3. decembrom 2019 –