natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
INSPECTOR IN CHARGE [1] Compulsory information required by Article 118 of this Regulation. NAME AND NATIONALITY
IME IN DRŽAVLJANSTVO GLAVNEGA INŠPEKTORJA [1] Obvezne informacije, zahtevane v členu 118 te uredbe.
INSPECTOR 2 [1] Compulsory information required by Article 118 of this Regulation. NAME AND NATIONALITY
IME IN DRŽAVLJANSTVO INŠPEKTORJA ŠT. 2 [1] Obvezne informacije, zahtevane v členu 118 te uredbe.
Where such passage is by means of a bulwark ladder, such ladder shall be securely attached to the bulwark rail or platform and two handhold stanchions shall be fitted at the point of boarding or leaving the vessel not less than 0,70 m or more than 0,80 m apart. Each stanchion shall be rigidly secured to the vessel’s structure at or near its base and also at a higher point, shall be not less than 40 mm in diameter, and shall extend not less than 1,20 m above the top of the bulwark.
Če prehod poteka z ograjno lestvijo, je ta varno pritrjena na ograjo ali palubo, na točki vkrcanja na ladjo oziroma izkrcanja z ladje pa sta nameščena dva oprijemalna drogova, ki med seboj ne smeta biti oddaljena več kot 0,80 m in ne manj kot 0,70 m. Vsak drog je trdno in varno pritrjen na konstrukcijo plovila na osnovi, blizu nje in na višji točki, s premerom najmanj 40 mm in najmanj 1,20 m višje od vrha polne ograje.
fax number; (f) e-mail address;
številka telefaksa;
for EU fishing vessels over 10 metres length overall and less than 17 metres length overall, the height of the letters and numbers shall be at least 25 centimetres with a line thickness of at least 4 centimetres. For EU fishing vessels of 17 metres length overall or more, the height of the letters and numbers shall be at least 45 centimetres, with a line thickness of at least 6 centimetres;
pri ribiških plovilih EU, katerih skupna dolžina presega 10 metrov in je manjša od 17 metrov, so črke in številke visoke najmanj 25 centimetrov, črta pa je široka najmanj 4 centimetre; Pri ribiških plovilih EU, katerih skupna dolžina je 17 metrov ali več, so črke in številke visoke najmanj 45 centimetrov, črta pa je široka najmanj 6 centimetrov;
The geographical area in which the transhipment took place [4]. (See details of sub-elements and attributes of RAS).
Geografsko območje, na katerem je bilo opravljeno pretovarjanje [4](Glej podrobne podatke o podelementih in atributih RAS)
Geographical location of the vessel [4]. (See details of sub-elements and attributes of RAS).
Geografski položaj plovila [4](glej podrobne podatke o podelementih in atributih RAS)
Gear Shot Identifier GS
Datum konca operacije nastavljanja orodja in zaporedna številka dneva (MMDDXX).
Year ,
leto,
Marker that indicates this fishing activity report was received just prior to an inspection carried out onboard the vessel. (IS=1).
Označevalec, ki označuje, da je bilo to poročilo o ribolovnih dejavnostih prejeto tik pred inšpekcijskim pregledom, izvedenim na krovu plovila (IS = 1).
Get LOG data (full 12 months unless specified by SD and ED below up to maximum of 12 months). The current and latest data available shall always be included.
Pridobivanje podatkov LOG (polnih 12 mesecev, če SD in ED spodaj ne določata drugače, do največ 12 mesecev) Vedno se vključijo trenutni in najnovejši razpoložljivi podatki.
(GMT)
(po GMT)
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy
Popravek Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 404/2011 z dne 8. aprila 2011 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike
(Official Journal of the European Union L 112 of 30 April 2011)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 112 z dne 30. aprila 2011)
On page 18, Article 57(4):
Stran 18, člen 57(4):
‘Member States that collect systematically on at least a monthly basis for each of their fishing vessels not subject to fishing logbook and landing requirements data:
„Za države članice, ki za vsa svoja ribiška plovila, za katera ne veljajo zahteve v zvezi z ribolovnim ladijskim dnevnikom in iztovarjanjem, vsaj enkrat mesečno sistematično zbirajo podatke:
on the statistical rectangles where these catches where taken shall be considered to have met the requirement of a sampling plan as referred to in Article 56 of this Regulation.’,
o statističnih območjih, na katerih je bil ulov opravljen; se šteje, da so izpolnile zahtevo po načrtu vzorčenja iz člena 56 te uredbe.“
‘Member States shall be considered to have met the requirement of a sampling plan as referred to in Article 56 of this Regulation if they collect systematically on at least a monthly basis for each of their fishing vessels not subject to fishing logbook and landing declaration requirements data:
„Za države članice se šteje, da so izpolnile zahtevo po načrtu vzorčenja iz člena 56 te uredbe, če za vsa svoja ribiška plovila, za katera ne veljajo zahteve v zvezi z ribolovnim ladijskim dnevnikom in deklaracijo o iztovarjanju, vsaj enkrat mesečno sistematično zbirajo podatke:
on the statistical rectangles where these catches were taken.’;
o statističnih območjih, na katerih je bil ulov opravljen.“
on page 88, Annex XIII, species ‘Anglerfish’, third line (GUH):
Stran 88, Priloga XIII, vrsta „morska spaka“, tretja vrstica (GUH):
on page 92, Annex XIII, species ‘European plaice’, second line (GUT):
Stran 92, Priloga XIII, vrsta „morska plošča“, druga vrstica (GUT):
on page 98, Annex XV, species ‘Cod’, seventh line (SAD):
Stran 98, Priloga XV, vrsta „trska“, sedma vrstica (SAD):
on page 101, Annex XV, species ‘Atlantic redfishes’, third line (GUH):
Stran 101, Priloga XV, vrsta „rdeči okuni“, tretja vrstica (GUH)
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 405/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 405/2011
imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel bars and rods originating in India
o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih palic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti člena 15(1) Uredbe,
The Commission, by Regulation (EU) No 1261/2010 [2] (the provisional Regulation) imposed a provisional countervailing duty on imports of certain stainless steel bars originating in India.
Komisija je z Uredbo (EU) št. 1261/2010 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasna uredba) uvedla začasno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz nekaterih palic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije.
The proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 15 February 2010 by the European Federation of Iron and Steel Industries (Eurofer) (the complainant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 25 %, of total Union production of certain stainless steel bars.
Postopek se je začel na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 15. februarja 2010 vložila Evropska zveza za železo in jeklo (Eurofer) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožnik) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 25 %, celotne proizvodnje nekaterih palic iz nerjavnega jekla Unije.
As set out in recital 23 of the provisional regulation, the investigation of subsidisation and injury covered the period from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2010 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava subvencioniranja in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2009 do 31. marca 2010 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP), kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 23 začasne uredbe.
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 2007 to the end of the investigation period (period considered).
Preučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od leta 2007 do konca obdobja preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional countervailing measures (provisional disclosure), several interested parties made written submissions making their views known on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev o uvedbi začasnih izravnalnih ukrepov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasno razkritje), je več zainteresiranih strani v pisnih izjavah sporočilo svoja stališča glede začasnih ugotovitev.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account, where appropriate.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile preučene in po potrebi ustrezno upoštevane.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain stainless steel bars originating in India and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih palic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
The parties were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this final disclosure.
Določeno je bilo tudi obdobje, v katerem so strani lahko predložile svoja stališča v zvezi s tem dokončnim razkritjem.
In the absence of any comments concerning the parties concerned by the proceeding, recitals 5 to 22 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s stranmi, ki jih postopek zadeva, ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 5 do 22 začasne uredbe.
It is recalled that, as stated in recital 24 of the provisional Regulation, ‘the product concerned’ was defined as stainless steel bars and rods, not further worked than cold-formed or cold-finished, other than bars and rods of circular cross-section of a diameter of 80 mm or more, originating in India currently falling within CN codes 72222021, 72222029, 72222031, 72222039, 72222081 and 72222089.
Treba je spomniti, da je bil „zadevni izdelek“, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 24 začasne uredbe, opredeljen kot palice iz nerjavnega jekla, hladno oblikovane ali hladno dodelane, brez nadaljnje obdelave, razen palic okroglega prečnega prereza in s premerom 80 mm ali več, s poreklom iz Indije, trenutno uvrščen v oznake KN 72222021, 72222029, 72222031, 72222039, 72222081 in 72222089.
One exporting producer in India claimed that SSB of a circular cross section of a diameter of less than 80 mm but outside the tolerance range of H6 to H11 should be excluded from the investigation because it does not fall within the product scope.
En proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji je trdil, da bi bilo treba palice iz nerjavnega jekla okroglega prečnega prereza in s premerom manj kot 80 mm, vendar zunaj meje dovoljenega odstopanja od H6 do H11, izključiti iz preiskave, ker ne spadajo v obseg izdelka.
This argument was rejected since the product scope does not refer to tolerances.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena, ker se obseg izdelka ne nanaša na dovoljena odstopanja.
The product control number (PCN) in the questionnaire does contain a field for tolerances limited to range H6 to H11 but this is only for comparison purposes and has no binding consequences for the product under investigation.
Kontrolna številka izdelka v vprašalniku vsebuje polje za dovoljena odstopanja z omejitvijo od H6 do H11, vendar je namenjeno samo primerjavi in nima obvezujočih posledic za izdelek v preiskavi.
It is therefore concluded that products outside the tolerance range of H6 to H11 should not be excluded.
Zato se sklene, da se izdelke zunaj meje dovoljenega odstopanja od H6 do H11 ne bi smelo izključiti.
It should be noted that for the calculation of the provisional subsidy and injury margins, the products outside the tolerance range of H6 to H11 were taken into account.
Treba bi bilo opozoriti, da so bili za izračun začasnih stopenj subvencije in škode upoštevani izdelki zunaj meje dovoljenega odstopanja od H6 do H11.
In the absence of any comments concerning the like product, recital 25 of the provision Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom ni bilo nobene pripombe, se uvodna izjava 25 začasne uredbe potrdi.
In recital 26 of the provisional Regulation, reference was made to the following schemes, which allegedly involve the granting of subsidies:
V uvodni izjavi 26 začasne uredbe so navedene naslednje sheme, ki domnevno vključujejo dodelitev subvencij:
duty entitlement passbook scheme;
shema za preložitev plačila uvoznih dajatev (Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme);
advance authorisation scheme;
shema za vnaprejšnje odobritve (Advance Authorisation Scheme);
export promotion capital goods scheme;
shema za podporo izvozu investicijskega blaga (Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme);
export oriented units scheme;
shema izvozno usmerjenih obratov (Export Oriented Units Scheme);
export credit scheme.
shema izvoznih kreditov (Export Credit Scheme).
The Union industry questioned whether the Commission failed to take into account a number of subsidy schemes, and as a result believed that the subsidies found to be received by Indian producers were underestimated.
Industrija Unije je podvomila, da Komisija ni upoštevala več shem subvencioniranja, in je zato menila, da so bile subvencije, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so jih prejeli indijski proizvajalci, prenizko ocenjene.
In reply to this, it should be noted that the complaint contained a great number of national and local subsidy schemes, which were included in the questionnaire to exporting producers in India and investigated by the Commission.
V odgovor na to bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je pritožba vsebovala veliko število nacionalnih in lokalnih shem subvencioniranja, ki so bile vključene v vprašalnik proizvajalcem izvoznikom in ki jih je Komisija preučila.
However, only for the schemes listed in recital 12 above, it was found that the investigated exporting producers in the sample had received subsidies.
Vendar je bilo samo za sheme iz uvodne izjave 12 ugotovljeno, da so preiskani proizvajalci izvozniki, vključeni v vzorec, prejeli subvencije.
The Union industry also argued that the Commission findings contradict a US Department of Commence (US DOC) finding in a recent countervailing proceedings concerning certain steel exports from India where much higher subsidies were found.
Industrija Unije je trdila tudi, da so ugotovitve Komisije v nasprotju z ugotovitvijo Ministrstva za trgovino Združenih držav (Ministrstva za trgovino ZDA) v nedavnem izravnalnem postopku v zvezi z nekaterim izvozom jekla iz Indije, v okviru katerega so bile ugotovljene veliko višje subvencije.
However, it should be noted that this finding relates to a different product and cover a different investigation period.
Vendar bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je ta ugotovitev povezana z drugačnim izdelkom in zajema drugačno obdobje preiskave.
Consequently, this argument is hereby rejected.
Zato se ta trditev zavrne.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals 26 to 28 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe, se uvodne izjave 26 do 28 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Duty entitlement passbook scheme (DEPBS)
Shema za preložitev plačila uvoznih dajatev (DEPBS)
Several parties argued that the DEPBS should not be considered as a countervailable subsidy, since the purpose of the scheme is to offset customs duties on imports.
Več strani je trdilo, da se DEPBS ne bi smelo obravnavati kot izravnalno subvencijo, ker je namen te sheme izravnati carine na uvoz.
As explained in recital 38 of the provisional Regulation this scheme cannot be considered a permissible duty drawback system or substitution drawback system within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation since it does not conform to the rules laid down in Annex I item (i), Annex II (definition and rules for drawback) and Annex III (definition and rules for substitution drawback) to the basic Regulation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 38 začasne uredbe, ta shema ne more veljati za dovoljen sistem povračila dajatev ali nadomestni sistem povračila v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe, saj ni usklajena s pravili iz točke (i) Priloge I, Priloge II (opredelitev in pravila za povračila) in Priloge III (opredelitev in pravila za nadomestna povračila) k osnovni uredbi.
Moreover, there is no system or procedure in place to confirm which inputs are consumed in the production process of the exported product or whether an excess payment of import duties occurred within the meaning of item (i) of Annex I, and Annexes II and III to the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega ni niti sistema niti postopka, ki bi potrdil, katere surovine so porabljene v proizvodnem procesu izvoznega izdelka oziroma ali je prišlo do presežnega plačila uvoznih dajatev v smislu točke (i) Priloge I ter prilog II in III k osnovni uredbi.
In order to obtain the benefit, it is sufficient for an exporter to simply export goods without demonstrating that any input material was imported.
Za dodelitev ugodnosti zadošča, da izvoznik zgolj izvaža blago, ne da bi dokazal, da so bile uvožene kakršne koli surovine.
Thus, even exporters which procure all of their inputs locally and do not import any goods which can be used as inputs are still entitled to benefit from the DEPBS.
Tako so izvozniki, ki vse svoje surovine nabavljajo lokalno in ne uvažajo nobenega blaga, ki se lahko uporablja kot surovine, še vedno upravičeni do ugodnosti v okviru DEPBS.
Therefore, these arguments are hereby rejected.
Zato se te trditve zavrnejo.
In case of sales of the DEPB licence, one party argued that the actual selling price was below the licence value and therefore the benefit was less.
V primeru prodaje licence DEPB je ena stran trdila, da je bila dejanska prodajna cena nižja od vrednosti licence in da je bila ugodnost zato nižja.
In this regard, it should be noted that the benefit under this scheme was calculated on the basis of the amount of credit granted in the licence regardless of whether the licence was used to offset customs duties on imports or whether the licence was actually sold.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je bila ugodnost v okviru te sheme izračunana na podlagi zneska kredita, odobrenega z licenco, ne glede na to, ali je bila licenca uporabljena za izravnavo carin na uvoz oziroma ali je bila licenca dejansko prodana.
It is considered that any sale of a licence at a price less the face value is a pure commercial decision which does not alter the amount of benefit received under this scheme.
Šteje se, da je prodaja licence po ceni, nižji od nominalne vrednosti, izključno tržna odločitev, ki ne spremeni zneska ugodnosti, prejete v okviru te sheme.
Therefore, this argument is hereby rejected.
Zato se ta trditev zavrne.
One party further argued that even if the DEPBS was considered countervailable, the benefit received under the scheme should not be based on export value, but rather the actual use of the DEPB licence.
Ena stran je nadalje trdila, da tudi če se je DEPBS obravnavala kot izravnalna, ugodnost, prejeta v okviru sheme, ne bi smela temeljiti na izvozni vrednosti, temveč bolj na dejanski uporabi licence DEPB.
In this respect, it should be recalled that in accordance with Articles 3(2) and 5 of the basic Regulation, the amount of countervailable subsidies was calculated in terms of benefit conferred on the recipient, which is found to exist during the IP.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba spomniti, da je bil znesek subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalne subvencije, v skladu s členom 3(2) in členom 5 osnovne uredbe izračunan glede na ugodnost za prejemnika, za katerega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je obstajal med OP.
In this regard, it was considered that the benefit is conferred on the recipient at the point of time when an export transaction is made under this scheme.
V tem smislu se je štelo, da je ugodnost dodeljena prejemniku takrat, ko se izvede izvozna transakcija na podlagi te sheme.
At that moment, the Government of India (GOI) is liable to forego the customs duties, which constitutes a financial contribution within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation.
V navedenem trenutku se lahko indijska vlada odpove carinam, kar predstavlja finančni prispevek v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(i) osnovne uredbe.
Once the customs authorities issue an export shipping bill which shows, inter alia, the amount of DEPBS credit which is to be granted for that export transaction, the GOI has no discretion as to whether or not to grant the subsidy.
Ko carinski organi izdajo izvozno odpremnico, ki med drugim navaja znesek kredita DEPBS, ki se odobri za to izvozno transakcijo, indijska vlada nima pravice odločati o tem, ali se subvencija odobri ali ne.
By virtue of the fact that a company is aware that it will receive a subsidy under DEPBS, the company is in a more advantageous position, because it can reflect the subsidies through offering lower prices.
Na podlagi dejstva, da se družba zaveda, da bo prejela subvencijo v okviru DEPBS, je družba v ugodnejšem položaju, saj lahko zaradi subvencij ponudi nižje cene.
The moment of export is decisive in order to establish conferral of a benefit, not the subsequent usage, because an exporter already with such vested right is ‘better off’ in financial terms.
Za ugotovitev dodelitve ugodnosti je ključen trenutek izvoza in ne kasnejša uporaba, ker je izvoznik, ki že ima takšno pravico, v finančno smislu „na boljšem“.
Consequently, this claim is hereby rejected.
Zato se ta trditev zavrne.
In the absence of any other comments concerning this scheme, recitals 29 to 41 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s to shemo ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 29 do 41 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Advance authorisation scheme (AAS)
Shema vnaprejšnjih odobritev (AAS)
One party argued that the AAS should be considered as a duty drawback system, because the imported materials are used to produce exported goods.
Ena stran je trdila, da bi bilo treba AAS obravnavati kot sistem povračila dajatev, ker se uvoženi materiali uporabljajo za proizvodnjo izvoznega blaga.
In reply to this argument, it was explained in recital 54 of the provisional Regulation that the sub-scheme used in the present case cannot be considered permissible duty drawback system or substitution drawback system within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
V odgovor na to trditev je bilo v uvodni izjavi 54 začasne uredbe pojasnjeno, da se v tem primeru uporabljena podshema ne more šteti za dovoljen sistem povračila dajatev ali nadomestni sistem povračil v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
The GOI did not effectively apply a verification system or a procedure to confirm whether and in what amounts inputs were consumed in the production of the exported product (Annex II(II)(4) to the basic Regulation and, in the case of substitution drawback schemes, Annex III(II)(2) to the basic Regulation).
Indijska vlada ni učinkovito uporabljala svojega sistema ali postopka preverjanja, da bi potrdila, ali in v kakšnih količinah so bile surovine porabljene pri proizvodnji izvoznega izdelka (Priloga II(II)(4) k osnovni uredbi in v primeru shem nadomestnih povračil Priloga III(II)(2) k osnovni uredbi).