natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In case of developments that require an amendment of the statement of recognition because requirements for one or more areas of competence specified on it are no longer fulfilled the recognised examiner should immediately cease conducting examinations in those areas of competence and inform in writing the competent authority.
Če razvoj dogodkov pokaže, da je potrebna sprememba izjave o priznanju, ker zahteve za eno ali več področij pristojnosti, navedenih v izjavi, niso več izpolnjene, mora priznani ocenjevalec takoj prenehati izvajati preverjanja na teh področjih pristojnosti in o tem pisno obvestiti pristojni organ.
A statement of recognition should be renewed on request of the examiner and should be issued under the same conditions as an initial statement of recognition.
Izjavo o priznanju je treba obnoviti na zahtevo ocenjevalca in jo izdati pod istimi pogoji kot prvotno izjavo o priznanju.
The competent authority may establish a simplified procedure where the conditions for previous recognition have stayed unchanged.
Pristojni organ lahko določi poenostavljen postopek, pri katerem pogoji za prejšnje priznanje ostanejo nespremenjeni.
In any case examiners applying for renewal should submit records of the competence they have received during the previous period of validity and of examination activities performed during the last 2 years.
V vsakem primeru morajo ocenjevalci, ki so zaprosili za obnovo, predložiti dokazila o usposobljenosti, ki so jih pridobili v prejšnjem obdobju veljavnosti, in o dejavnostih preverjanj, izvedenih v zadnjih dveh letih.
Where the previous period of validity was shortened to less than 2 years in accordance with point 33, records of the whole period should be submitted respectively.
Če je bilo prejšnje obdobje veljavnosti skrajšano na manj kot dve leti v skladu s točko 33, je treba predložiti dokazila za celotno obdobje.
Register of examiners
Register ocenjevalcev
In the register referred to in Article 20(3) of Directive 2007/59/EC, each examiner should be identified by an individual identification.
V registru iz člena 20(3) Direktive 2007/59/ES mora biti vsak ocenjevalec označen z individualno identifikacijsko številko.
The identification number should be based on national provisions; however, it should include the short name of the Member State where the examiner is recognised.
Identifikacijska številka mora temeljiti na nacionalnih določbah, vendar mora vključevati kratko ime države članice, v kateri je ocenjevalec priznan.
name, address, date of birth of the recognised examiner;
ime, naslov, datum rojstva priznanega ocenjevalca;
the area(s) of competence for which the examiner is recognised to conduct examinations;
področja pristojnosti, na katerih lahko ocenjevalec izvaja preverjanja;
the language(s) in which the examiner is recognised to conduct examinations;
jezike, v katerih lahko ocenjevalec izvaja preverjanja;
the identification number of the examiner provided in accordance with point 37;
identifikacijsko številko ocenjevalca, zagotovljeno v skladu s točko 37;
where an employer applies on behalf of the examiner in accordance with point 28, the name and address of the employer (in other cases the name and address of an employer of the examiner may be included on an optional basis);
če zahtevek vloži delodajalec v imenu ocenjevalca v skladu s točko 28, mora register vsebovati tudi ime in naslov delodajalca (v drugih primerih se lahko po izbiri vključi ime in naslov delodajalca ocenjevalca);
In order to keep the register up-to-date, a recognised examiner or his or her employer should inform the authority that has issued the statement of recognition about any change concerning data contained in the register.
Priznan ocenjevalec ali njegov delodajalec mora za namen posodabljanja registra obvestiti organ, ki je izdal izjavo o priznanju, o kakršnih koli spremembah v zvezi s podatki, vključenimi v register.
National provisions may foresee additional data to be stored in the register and information on change regarding those data.
Nacionalne določbe lahko zahtevajo, da se v register shranijo dodatni podatki ter informacije o spremembi v zvezi s temi podatki.
Data referred to in point 38(a), (b) and (c) should be made publicly accessible.
Podatki iz točke 38(a), (b) in (c) morajo biti javno dostopni.
Other data listed in point 38 should be made public in accordance with national provisions on personal data protection.
Drugi podatki, navedeni v točki 38, morajo biti objavljeni v skladu z nacionalnimi določbami o varstvu osebnih podatkov.
Where assessment or supervision activities performed by the competent authority in conformity with Articles 26, 27 or 29 of Directive 2007/59/EC give evidence that an examiner fails to meet the requirements for recognition, the competent authority should withdraw or suspend the statement of recognition.
Če dejavnosti ocenjevanja ali nadzora, ki jih izvaja pristojni organ v skladu s členom 26, 27 ali 29 Direktive 2007/59/ES, dokazujejo, da ocenjevalec ne izpolnjuje zahtev za priznanje, mora pristojni organ izjavo o priznanju odvzeti ali začasno preklicati.
If a competent authority finds that an examiner recognised by the competent authority of another Member State does not satisfy one or more requirements of the Directive 2007/59/EC and of Decision 765/2011, they should inform the competent authority in the Member State that issued the statement of recognition and require the appropriate checks by this latter.
Če pristojni organ ugotovi, da ocenjevalec, ki ga je priznal pristojni organ druge države članice, ne izpolnjuje ene ali več zahtev iz Direktive 2007/59/ES in Sklepa 765/2011, mora o tem obvestiti pristojni organ v državi članici, ki je izdala izjavo o priznanju, in od te zadnje države članice zahtevati izvedbo ustreznih preverjanj.
If the competent authority of this latter Member State finds that the examiner no longer meets the requirements, it should withdraw or suspend the statement of recognition, promptly inform the examiner in writing of the reasons for its decisions and notify its decision to the competent authority which informed of the failure to meet the requirements.
Če pristojni organ v tej zadnji državi članici ugotovi, da ocenjevalec ne izpolnjuje več zahtev, mora izjavo o priznanju odvzeti ali začasno preklicati, nemudoma pisno obvestiti ocenjevalca o razlogih za njegove odločitve ter predložiti svojo odločitev pristojnemu organu, ki je sporočil, da zahteve niso izpolnjene.
The competent authority should promptly inform the examiner in writing of the reasons for its decisions.
Pristojni organ mora nemudoma pisno obvestiti ocenjevalca o razlogih za svoje odločitve.
In case of suspension or withdrawal the competent authority should provide clear information on the requirements that are no longer fulfilled.
V primeru začasnega preklica ali odvzema mora pristojni organ jasno obvestiti ocenjevalca o zahtevah, ki jih več ne izpolnjuje.
The competent authority may, before suspension or withdrawal becomes effective, provide a notice period within which the examiner may adapt its practices in order to meet the requirements for recognition.
Pristojni organ lahko, preden začne veljati začasni preklic ali odvzem, določi rok, v katerem lahko ocenjevalec prilagodi svoje prakse, da bi izpolnil zahteve za priznanje.
The competent authority should ensure that an administrative appeal procedure is set up allowing applicants or examiners to request a review of disputed decisions.
Pristojni organ mora zagotoviti vzpostavitev upravnega pritožbenega postopka, ki prosilcem ali ocenjevalcem omogoča, da zahtevajo pregled spornih odločitev.
Examiners assessing language competence
Ocenjevalci, ki ocenjujejo jezikovno kompetenco
In regard to the examining of general language competence and to acknowledge the applicant as an examiner, a Member State may recognise the applicant on the basis of a certificate, issued in conformity with common practice on the language training sector.
V zvezi s preverjanjem splošne jezikovne kompetence in priznavanjem prosilca za ocenjevalca lahko država članica prizna prosilca na podlagi spričevala, izdanega v skladu s splošno prakso pri izvajanju jezikovnega usposabljanja.
This certificate should confirm the competence of the applicant to conduct examinations in line with principles and methodology of the ‘European Framework for Language Competence’ established by the Council of Europe.
To spričevalo mora potrjevati usposobljenost prosilca za izvajanje preverjanj v skladu z načeli in metodologijo „Evropskega okvira jezikovnih kompetenc“, ki ga je oblikoval Svet Evrope.
The Member State may lay down supplementary provisions to specify the use of this option taking into account national practice regarding the certification of language competence of examiners.
Država članica lahko oblikuje dodatne določbe, ki opredeljujejo uporabo te možnosti, ob upoštevanju nacionalne prakse v zvezi s certifikacijo jezikovne kompetence ocenjevalcev.
In regard to the examining of competence on specific communication and terminology for rail operation and safety procedures, recognition in accordance with the provisions of this Recommendation should be required.
V zvezi s preverjanjem kompetence o posebnem sporazumevanju in terminologiji za železniške storitve in varnostne postopke je potrebno priznanje v skladu z določbami tega priporočila.
Applications for recognition as an examiner for the purpose of conducting examinations concerning specific communication and terminology for rail operation and safety procedures should be submitted to the competent authority of the Member State where the infrastructure, to which the communication and terminology refer, is located.
Zahtevke za priznanje za ocenjevalca za namen izvajanja preverjanj na področju posebnega sporazumevanja in terminologije za železniške storitve in varnostne postopke je treba predložiti pristojnemu organu države članice, v kateri se nahaja infrastruktura, na katero se nanaša sporazumevanje in terminologija.
Recognition of examination centres
Priznavanje centrov za preverjanje
A Member State may decide to require recognition of examination centres on basis of a written application submitted to the competent authority.
Država članica lahko zahteva priznanje centrov za preverjanje na podlagi pisnega zahtevka, ki je bil predložen pristojnemu organu.
The competent authority should provide a statement of recognition of the examination centre following national provisions and procedures and on the basis of the criteria of independence, competence and impartiality.
Pristojni organ mora predložiti izjavo o priznanju centra za preverjanje v skladu z nacionalnimi določbami in postopki ter na podlagi meril neodvisnosti, usposobljenosti in nepristranskosti.
Points 26 to 48 should apply to recognition of examination centres.
Točke 26 do 48 se morajo uporabljati za priznanje centrov za preverjanje.
The competent authority could also delegate to these examination centres the recognition of its own examiners under the condition that they fulfil the requirements laid down in point 53.
Pristojni organ lahko na te centre za preverjanje prenese tudi nalogo priznavanja lastnih ocenjevalcev, če ti izpolnjujejo zahteve iz točke 53.
For the purpose of point 54 the examination centre should keep up-to-date a register of all examiners it has recognised.
Za namen točke 54 mora center za preverjanje posodabljati register vseh ocenjevalcev, ki jih je priznal.
This register should provide the information referred to in point 38.
Register mora vsebovati informacije iz točke 38.
The examination centre should provide appropriate measures to manage its examiners and to ensure that its examiners have the competences required in accordance with Directive 2007/59/EC and Decision 765/2011.
Center za preverjanje mora zagotoviti ustrezne ukrepe za upravljanje svojih ocenjevalcev in zagotoviti, da imajo ti kompetence, zahtevane v skladu z Direktivo 2007/59/ES in Sklepom 765/2011.
Examiners should be allowed to conduct examinations only in the framework of activities of the examination centre to which they belong.
Ocenjevalci smejo izvajati preverjanja le v okviru dejavnosti centra za preverjanje, katerega del so.
The information on the recognised examination centre should be publicly accessible in the register provided for in point 38 without providing information on the individual examiners belonging to that examination centre.
Informacije o priznanem centru za preverjanje morajo biti javno dostopne v registru iz točke 38, vendar morajo biti izvzete informacije o posameznih ocenjevalcih, ki pripadajo temu centru za preverjanje.
The name of the examination centre should be displayed instead of the identification number referred to in point 37.
Namesto identifikacijske številke iz točke 37 mora biti navedeno ime centra za preverjanje.
The competent authority should promptly inform the examination centre in writing of the reasons for its decisions.
Pristojni organ mora nemudoma pisno obvestiti center za preverjanje o razlogih za svoje odločitve.
The competent authority may, before suspension or withdrawal becomes effective, provide a notice period within which the examination centre may adapt its practices in order to meet the requirements for recognition.
Pristojni organ lahko, preden začne veljati začasni preklic ali odvzem, določi rok, v katerem lahko center za preverjanje prilagodi svoje prakse, da bi izpolnil zahteve za priznanje.
The competent authority should ensure that an administrative appeal procedure is set up allowing applicants or examination centres to request a review of disputed decisions.
Pristojni organ mora zagotoviti vzpostavitev upravnega pritožbenega postopka, ki prosilcem ali centrom za preverjanje omogoča, da zahtevajo pregled spornih odločitev.
Transparent evaluation rules
Pregledna pravila ocenjevanja
The evaluation and scoring principles and the type of results should be available before the examinations.
Načela ocenjevanja in točkovanja ter vrsta rezultatov morajo biti določena pred preverjanji.
Drivers or candidate drivers should be allowed to view the evaluation of examination results and to request a review in case of a reasoned negative opinion regarding the examinations they took.
Vozniki ali kandidati za voznike si smejo ogledati oceno rezultatov preverjanj ter zahtevati pregled v primeru utemeljenega negativnega mnenja v zvezi s preverjanji, ki so jih opravili.
Quality checks and supervision by the competent authority
Preverjanje kakovosti in nadzor s strani pristojnega organa
In order to comply with their supervision activities in conformity with Articles 26, 27 or 29 of Directive 2007/59/EC, a competent authority may require:
Pristojni organ lahko, da bi zagotovil skladnost dejavnosti nadzora s členi 26, 27 ali 29 Direktive 2007/59/ES, zahteva:
access to all documents relevant for the preparation, conduction and evaluation of examinations;
dostop do vseh dokumentov, ki so pomembni za pripravo, izvajanje in ocenjevanje preverjanj;
the adoption of a reporting procedure requiring that certain information should be delivered regularly or on demand;
sprejetje postopka poročanja, na podlagi katerega je treba določene informacije zagotavljati redno ali na zahtevo;
an observation of examinations by representatives of a competent authority.
spremljanje preverjanj s strani predstavnikov pristojnega organa.
Also available on the Council of Europe website: http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/documents/Common%20European%20Framework%20hyperlinked.pdf
Na voljo je tudi na spletni strani Sveta: http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/documents/Common%20European%20Framework%20hyperlinked.pdf.
Commission Directive 2011/1/EU
Direktiva Komisije 2011/1/EU
of 3 January 2011
z dne 3. januarja 2011
amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include 6-Benzyladenine as active substance and amending Decision 2008/941/EC
o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS zaradi vključitve 6-benziladenina kot aktivne snovi in o spremembi Odločbe 2008/941/ES
That list included 6-Benzyladenine.
Navedeni seznam je vključeval 6-benziladenin.
In accordance with Article 24e of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 the notifier withdrew its support of the inclusion of that active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC within 2 months from receipt of the draft assessment report.
V skladu s členom 24e Uredbe (ES) št. 2229/2004 je prijavitelj umaknil svoj predlog za vključitev aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS v dveh mesecih po prejemu osnutka poročila o presoji.
Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/941/EC of 8 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances [4] was adopted on the non-inclusion of 6-Benzyladenine.
Zato je bila v zvezi z nevključitvijo 6-benziladenina sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/941/ES z dne 8. decembra 2008 o nevključitvi nekaterih aktivnih snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo te snovi [4].
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the original notifier (hereinafter the applicant) submitted a new application requesting the application of the accelerated procedure provided for in Articles 14 to 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5].
Prvotni prijavitelj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik) je v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS predložil nov zahtevek, v katerem zahteva uporabo pospešenega postopka iz členov 14 do 19 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del programa dela iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [5].
The application was submitted to the United Kingdom, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004.
Zahtevek je bil predložen Združenemu kraljestvu, ki je bil za državo članico poročevalko imenovan z Uredbo (ES) št. 2229/2004.
The United Kingdom evaluated the additional data submitted by the applicant and prepared an additional report.
Združeno kraljestvo je ocenilo dodatne podatke, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in pripravilo dodatno poročilo.
It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 27 November 2009.
Navedeno poročilo je 27. novembra 2009 predložilo Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in Komisiji.
In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on 6-Benzyladenine to the Commission on 27 August 2010 [6].
Agencija je 27. avgusta 2010 v skladu s členom 20(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in na zahtevo Komisije Komisiji predstavila svoje sklepe o 6-benziladeninu [6].
The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 23 November 2010 in the format of the Commission review report for 6-Benzyladenine.
Osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatno poročilo in sklep Agencije so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 23. novembra 2010 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede 6-benziladenina.
It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing 6-Benzyladenine may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which have been examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
Različne preiskave so pokazale, da se za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo 6-benziladenin, lahko pričakuje, da na splošno izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS, zlasti v zvezi z uporabami, ki so bile proučene in podrobno navedene v poročilu Komisije o pregledu.
It is therefore appropriate to include 6-Benzyladenine in Annex I, in order to ensure that in all Member States the authorisations of plant protection products containing this active substance can be granted in accordance with the provisions of that Directive.
Zato je primerno vključiti 6-benziladenin v Prilogo I, da se v vseh državah članicah v skladu z določbami navedene direktive lahko registrirajo fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo to aktivno snov.
However, this clarification does not impose any new obligations on Member States or holders of authorisations compared to the Directives which have been adopted until now amending Annex I.
Vendar pa ta razjasnitev državam članicam ali imetnikom registracij ne nalaga nikakršnih novih obveznosti v primerjavi z doslej sprejetimi direktivami o spremembah Priloge I.
It is therefore appropriate to amend Decision 2008/941/EC accordingly.
Odločbo 2008/941/ES je treba zato ustrezno spremeniti.
The line concerning 6-Benzyladenine in the Annex to Decision 2008/941/EC is deleted.
V Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/941/ES se črta vrstica, ki zadeva 6-benziladenin.
Member States shall adopt and publish by 30 November 2011 at the latest the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo in objavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 30. novembra 2011.
They shall apply those provisions from 1 December 2011.
Navedene predpise uporabljajo od 1. decembra 2011.
Member States shall in accordance with Directive 91/414/EEC, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing 6-Benzyladenine as an active substance by 30 November 2011.
Države članice v skladu z Direktivo 91/414/EGS do 30. novembra 2011 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo obstoječe registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo 6-benziladenin kot aktivno snov.
By that date they shall in particular verify that the conditions in Annex I to that Directive relating to 6-Benzyladenine are met, with the exception of those identified in part B of the entry concerning that active substance, and that the holder of the authorisation has, or has access to, a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex II to that Directive in accordance with the conditions of Article 13 of that Directive.
Do navedenega datuma zlasti preverijo, ali so pogoji iz Priloge I k navedeni direktivi v zvezi s 6-benziladeninom, z izjemo tistih iz dela B besedila o navedeni aktivni snovi, izpolnjeni in ali ima imetnik registracije dokumentacijo ali dostop do dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge II k navedeni direktivi v skladu s pogoji iz člena 13 navedene direktive.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing 6-Benzyladenine as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances all of which were listed in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC by 31 May 2011 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles provided for in Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to that Directive and taking into account part B of the entry in Annex I to that Directive concerning 6-Benzyladenine.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice znova ocenijo vsako registrirano fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje 6-benziladenin kot edino aktivno snov ali kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, vključenih v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS najpozneje do 31. maja 2011, v skladu z enotnimi načeli iz Priloge VI k Direktivi 91/414/EGS na podlagi dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k navedeni direktivi, in ob upoštevanju dela B besedila o 6-benziladeninu iz Priloge I k navedeni direktivi.