natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
DECISION No … OF THE EU-SWITZERLAND JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED IN THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE SWISS CONFEDERATION IN THE AUDIOVISUAL FIELD, ESTABLISHING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF THE SWISS CONFEDERATION IN THE COMMUNITY PROGRAMME MEDIA 2007,
SKLEP št. … SKUPNEGA ODBORA EU-ŠVICA, USTANOVLJENEGA S SPORAZUMOM MED EVROPSKO SKUPNOSTJO IN ŠVICARSKO KONFEDERACIJO NA AVDIOVIZUALNEM PODROČJU, KI DOLOČA POGOJE ZA SODELOVANJE ŠVICARSKE KONFEDERACIJE V PROGRAMU SKUPNOSTI MEDIA 2007
Following the entry into force on 19 December 2007 of Directive 89/552/EEC as last amended by Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, as codified (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) [3], it appears appropriate to the Contracting Parties to update the references to that Directive accordingly, as provided in the Final Act to the Agreement in the Joint Declaration by the Contracting Parties on the adaptation of the Agreement to the new Community Directive, and to update Article 1 of Annex I to the Agreement, pursuant to Article 8(7) of the Agreement,
Potem ko je 19. decembra 2007 začela veljati Direktiva 89/552/EGS, nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2007/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, kakor je bila kodificirana (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah) [3], se zdi primerno, da pogodbeni stranki ustrezno posodobita sklicevanja na navedeno direktivo, kakor to določa Sklepna listina k Sporazumu v Skupni izjavi pogodbenic o prilagoditvi Sporazuma novi direktivi Skupnosti, in da v skladu s členom 8(7) Sporazuma prilagodita člen 1 Priloge I k Sporazumu –
Article 1 of Annex I to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Sporazumu se člen 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
suspend retransmission of broadcasts from a television broadcasting organisation under the jurisdiction of a Member State of the Union which has manifestly, seriously and gravely infringed the rules on the protection of minors and human dignity set out in Article 27(1) or (2) and/or Article 6 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive;
prekine prenose programov izdajateljev televizijskega programa pod sodno pristojnostjo katere od držav članic Unije, ki očitno, resno in huje krši pravila o varstvu mladoletnikov in človeškega dostojanstva iz člena 27(1) ali (2) oziroma člena 6 Direktive o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah;
require broadcasters under its jurisdiction to comply with more detailed or stricter rules in the fields coordinated by the Audiovisual Media Services Directive provided that such rules are proportionate and non-discriminatory.
od izdajateljev televizijskih programov pod njeno pristojnostjo zahteva, da upoštevajo natančnejša ali strožja pravila na področjih, ki jih usklajuje Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, pod pogojem, da so takšna pravila sorazmerna in nediskriminatorna.
In cases where Switzerland:
V primerih, ko Švica:
has exercised its freedom under paragraph 1(b) to adopt more detailed or stricter rules of general public interest; and
uveljavlja pravico na podlagi odstavka 1(b) za sprejetje natančnejših ali strožjih pravil splošnega javnega interesa in
assesses that a broadcaster under the jurisdiction of a Member State of the Union provides a television broadcast which is wholly or mostly directed towards its territory,
meni, da izdajatelj televizijskega programa pod sodno pristojnostjo druge države članice Unije razširja televizijske programe, ki so v celoti ali večinoma usmerjeni k njenemu ozemlju,
it may contact the Member State having jurisdiction with a view to achieving a mutually satisfactory solution to any problems posed.
lahko vzpostavi stik z državo članico, ki to sodno pristojnost ima, da bi prišli do vzajemno zadovoljive rešitve vseh obstoječih težav.
On receipt of a substantiated request by Switzerland, the Member State having jurisdiction shall request the broadcaster to comply with the rules of general public interest in question.
Ob prejemu utemeljene zahteve Švice država članica s sodno pristojnostjo od izdajatelja televizijskega programa zahteva, naj spoštuje zadevna pravila splošnega javnega interesa.
The Member State having jurisdiction shall inform Switzerland of the results obtained following this request within 2 months.
Država članica s sodno pristojnostjo v dveh mesecih obvesti Švico o rezultatih, ki jih je dosegla v zvezi z zahtevo.
that the results achieved through the application of paragraph 2 are not satisfactory; and
da rezultati, doseženi z uporabo odstavka 2, niso zadovoljivi in
that the broadcaster in question has established itself in the Member State having jurisdiction in order to circumvent the stricter rules, in the fields coordinated by the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, which would be applicable to it if it were established within Switzerland,
da ima zadevni izdajatelj televizijskega programa sedež v državi članici s sodno pristojnostjo zato, da bi zaobšel strožja pravila, ki bi zanj veljala na področjih, ki jih usklajuje Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, kot če bi imel sedež v Švici,
Switzerland may take measures pursuant to paragraph 1(a) or paragraph 3 of this Article only if the following conditions are met:
Švica lahko sprejme ukrepe na podlagi odstavka 1(a) ali 3 tega člena pod pogojem, da so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
it has notified the Joint Committee and the Member State in which the broadcaster is established of its intention to take such measures while substantiating the grounds on which it bases its assessment; and
da je uradno obvestila Skupni odbor in državo članico, v kateri ima izdajatelj televizijskega programa sedež, da bo sprejela takšne ukrepe, pri tem pa utemeljila razloge, na katerih temelji njena ocena, in
the Joint Committee has decided that the measures are proportionate and non-discriminatory, and in particular that assessments made by Switzerland under paragraphs 2 and 3 are correctly founded.
da je Skupni odbor odločil, da so ukrepi sorazmerni in nediskriminatorni in zlasti, da so ocene Švice na podlagi odstavkov 2 in 3 ustrezno utemeljene.
This Decision shall enter into force on the first day following its adoption.
Ta sklep začne veljati prvi dan po njegovem sprejetju.
Done at Brussels, … .
V Bruslju, …
OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p. 23.’
UL L 298, 17.10.1989, str. 23.“.
Switzerland shall ensure freedom of reception and retransmission on its territory with regard to television broadcasts under the jurisdiction of a Member State of the Union, as determined pursuant to Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (hereinafter referred to as the “Audiovisual Media Services Directive”), in accordance with the following procedures: Switzerland shall maintain the right to:
Švica na svojem ozemlju zagotovi svobodo sprejemanja in prenašanja televizijskih programov, ki so pod sodno pristojnostjo katere od držav članic Unije, kot je določeno z Direktivo 2010/13/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah), v skladu z naslednjimi postopki: Švica ohrani pravico, da
of 25 February 2011
z dne 25. februarja 2011
establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
o določitvi minimalnih zahtev glede čezmejne obdelave dokumentov z elektronskim podpisom pristojnih organov v skladu z Direktivo 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu
Service providers whose services fall within the scope of Directive 2006/123/EC must be able to complete, through the Points of Single Contact and by electronic means, the procedures and formalities necessary for the access to and the exercise of their activities.
Ponudnikom storitev, katerih storitve spadajo na področje uporabe Direktive 2006/123/ES, je treba omogočiti, da prek enotnih kontaktnih točk in po elektronski poti opravijo postopke in formalnosti, potrebne za dostop do teh dejavnosti in njihovo izvajanje.
Within the limits established in Article 5(3) of Directive 2006/123/EC, there may still be cases where service providers have to submit original documents, certified copies or certified translations when completing such procedures and formalities.
V okviru omejitev iz člena 5(3) Direktive 2006/123/ES bodo morali ponudniki storitev pri opravljanju navedenih postopkov in formalnosti v nekaterih primerih morda še vedno predložiti izvirnike dokumentov, overjene kopije ali overjene prevode.
In those cases, service providers may need to submit documents signed electronically by competent authorities.
V takih primerih bodo morali ponudniki storitev morda predložiti dokumente z elektronskim podpisom pristojnih organov.
The cross-border use of advanced electronic signatures supported by a qualified certificate is facilitated through Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 setting out measures facilitating the use of procedures by electronic means through the ‘points of single contact’ under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market [2] which, inter alia, imposes an obligation on Member States to carry out risk assessments before requiring these electronic signatures from service providers and establishes rules for the acceptance by Member States of advanced electronic signatures based on qualified certificates, created with or without a secure signature creation device.
Čezmejno uporabo izpopolnjenega elektronskega podpisa, podprtega s kvalificiranim potrdilom, omogoča Odločba Komisije 2009/767/ES z dne 16. oktobra 2009 o vzpostavitvi ukrepov za pospeševanje uporabe postopkov po elektronski poti s pomočjo „enotnih kontaktnih točk“ po Direktivi 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu [2], ki med drugim določa obveznost držav članic, da izvedejo ocene tveganja, preden od ponudnikov storitev zahtevajo te elektronske podpise, in določa pravila, po katerih države članice sprejmejo izpopolnjene elektronske podpise na podlagi kvalificiranih potrdil, narejene z napravo za varno elektronsko podpisovanje ali brez nje.
However, Decision 2009/767/EC does not deal with formats of electronic signatures in documents issued by competent authorities, that need to be submitted by service providers when completing the relevant procedures and formalities.
Vendar Odločba 2009/767/ES ne ureja oblik elektronskih podpisov v dokumentih, ki jih izdajo pristojni organi in ki jih morajo ponudniki storitev predložiti, ko opravijo zadevne postopke in formalnosti.
As competent authorities in Member States currently use different formats of advanced electronic signatures to sign their documents electronically, the receiving Member States that have to process these documents may face technical difficulties due to the variety of signature formats used.
Pri elektronskem podpisovanju svojih dokumentov uporabljajo pristojni organi držav članic različne oblike izpopolnjenih elektronskih podpisov, zato lahko imajo države članice prejemnice, ki morajo obdelati te dokumente, tehnične težave zaradi različnih uporabljenih oblik podpisov.
In order to allow service providers to complete their procedures and formalities across borders by electronic means, it is necessary to ensure that at least a number of advanced electronic signature formats can be technically supported by Member States when they receive documents signed electronically by competent authorities from other Member States.
Da se ponudnikom storitev omogoči čezmejno opravljanje postopkov in formalnosti po elektronski poti, je treba zagotoviti, da imajo države članice ob prejemu dokumentov z elektronskim podpisom pristojnih organov iz drugih držav članic tehnično podporo za vsaj nekatere oblike izpopolnjenega elektronskega podpisa.
Defining a number of advanced electronic signature formats that need to be supported technically by the receiving Member State would allow greater automation and improve the cross-border interoperability of electronic procedures.
Z opredelitvijo več oblik izpopolnjenega elektronskega podpisa, za katere mora imeti država članica prejemnica tehnično podporo, bi se izboljšala avtomatizacija in čezmejna interoperabilnost elektronskih postopkov.
Member States whose competent authorities use other electronic signature formats than those commonly supported, may have implemented validation means that allow their signatures to be verified also across borders.
Države članice, katerih pristojni organi uporabljajo namesto splošno priznanih druge oblike elektronskega podpisa, uporabljajo morda načine potrjevanja, ki omogočajo tudi čezmejno potrjevanje njihovih podpisov.
When this is the case and in order for the receiving Member States to be able to rely on these validation tools, it is necessary to make information on these tools available in an easily accessible way unless the necessary information is included directly in the electronic documents, in the electronic signatures or in the electronic document carriers.
V takem primeru in za zagotovitev, da se lahko države članice prejemnice zanesejo na ta orodja potrjevanja, morajo biti informacije o teh orodjih lahko dostopne, razen če so potrebne informacije vključene neposredno v elektronske dokumente, elektronske podpise ali zapise elektronskih dokumentov.
This Decision does not affect the determination by the Member States of what constitutes an original, a certified copy or a certified translation.
Ta sklep ne vpliva na odločitev držav članic, kaj predstavlja in določa izvirnik, overjeno kopijo ali overjen prevod.
Its objective is limited to facilitating the verification of electronic signatures if they are used in the originals, certified copies or certified translations that service providers may need to submit via the Points of Single Contact.
Z njim se želi samo olajšati preverjanje elektronskih podpisov, če so uporabljeni v izvirnikih, overjenih kopijah ali overjenih prevodih, ki jih bodo morali ponudniki storitev morda predložiti prek enotnih kontaktnih točk.
For the purpose of allowing Member States to implement the necessary technical tools, it is appropriate that this Decision applies as of 1 August 2011.
Da bi lahko države članice vzpostavile potrebna tehnična orodja, je ustrezno, da se začne ta sklep uporabljati 1. avgusta 2011.
Reference format for electronic signatures
Referenčna oblika elektronskih podpisov
Member States shall put in place the necessary technical means allowing them to process electronically signed documents that service providers submit in the context of completing procedures and formalities through the Points of Single Contact as foreseen by Article 8 of Directive 2006/123/EC, and which are signed by competent authorities of other Member States with an XML or a CMS or a PDF advanced electronic signature in the BES or EPES format, that complies with the technical specifications set out in the Annex.
Države članice vzpostavijo potrebna tehnična orodja, ki jim omogočajo obdelavo dokumentov z elektronskim podpisom, pri čemer ponudniki storitev te dokumente predložijo v okviru opravljanja postopkov in formalnosti prek enotnih kontaktnih točk, kot to določa člen 8 Direktive 2006/123/ES, ter jih pristojni organi drugih držav članic podpišejo z izpopolnjenim elektronskim podpisom XML, CMS ali PDF v formatu BES ali EPES, ki je v skladu s tehničnimi specifikacijami iz Priloge.
Member States whose competent authorities sign the documents referred to in paragraph 1 using other formats of electronic signatures than those referred to in that same paragraph, shall notify to the Commission existing validation possibilities that allow other Member States to validate the received electronic signatures online, free of charge and in a way that is understandable for non-native speakers unless the required information is already included in the document, in the electronic signature or in the electronic document carrier.
Države članice, katerih pristojni organi podpisujejo dokumente iz odstavka 1 z drugačnimi oblikami elektronskih podpisov, kot so navedene v istem odstavku, sporočijo Komisiji obstoječe možnosti potrjevanja, ki drugim državam članicam omogočajo potrjevanje prejetih elektronskih podpisov prek spleta, brezplačno in na način, ki je razumljiv nematernim govorcem, razen če so zahtevane informacije že vključene v dokument, elektronski podpis ali zapis elektronskega dokumenta.
The Commission will make that information available to all Member States.
Komisija da te informacije na voljo vsem državam članicam.
This Decision shall apply from 1 August 2011.
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. avgusta 2011.
Done at Brussels, 25 February 2011.
V Bruslju, 25. februarja 2011
OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 36.
UL L 274, 20.10.2009.
Specifications for an XML, CMS or PDF advanced electronic signature to be technically supported by the receiving Member State
Specifikacije za izpopolnjen elektronski podpis XML, CMS ali PDF, ki ga tehnično podpira država članica prejemnica
Within the following part of the document the key words ‘MUST’, ‘MUST NOT’, ‘REQUIRED’, ‘SHALL’, ‘SHALL NOT’, ‘SHOULD’, ‘SHOULD NOT’, ‘RECOMMENDED’, ‘MAY’, and ‘OPTIONAL’ are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].
V naslednjem delu dokumenta se ključne besede „MORA“, „NE SME“, „ZAHTEVA“, „PRIPOROČA“, „LAHKO“, in „NEOBVEZNO“ razlagajo, kot je navedeno v RFC 2119 [1].
SECTION 1 — XAdES-BES/EPES
ODDELEK 1 – XAdES-BES/EPES
The signature is conform with the W3C XML Signature specifications [2]
Podpis je v skladu s specifikacijami podpisa W3C XML [2].
The signature MUST at least be a XAdES-BES (or -EPES) signature form as specified in the ETSI TS 101 903 XAdES specifications [3] and complies with all the following additional specifications:
Podpis MORA imeti vsaj obliko podpisa XAdES-BES (ali -EPES), kot določajo specifikacije ETSI TS 101903 XAdES [3], in je v skladu z vsemi naslednjimi dodatnimi specifikacijami:
The ds:CanonicalizationMethod that specifies the canonicalization algorithm applied to the SignedInfo element prior to performing signature calculations identifies one of the following algorithms only:
Metoda za kanonikalizacijo ds:CanonicalizationMethod, ki določa algoritem kanonikalizacije, uporabljen za element SignedInfo pred izvedbo izračunov podpisa, opredeljuje samo enega od naslednjih algoritmov:
Canonical XML 1.0 (omits comments) http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
Canonical XML 1.0 (brez opomb) http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
Canonical XML 1.1 (omits comments) http://www.w3.org/2006/12/xml-c14n11
Canonical XML 1.1 (brez opomb) http://www.w3.org/2006/12/xml-c14n11
Exclusive XML Canonicalization 1.0 (omits comments) http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#
Exclusive XML Canonicalization 1.0 (brez opomb) http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#
Other algorithms or of ‘With comments’ versions of the above listed algorithms SHOULD NOT be used for the signature creation but SHOULD be supported for residual interoperability for the signature verification.
Drugi algoritmi ali različice zgoraj navedenih algoritmov „s pripombami“ se NE SMEJO uporabljati za oblikovanje podpisov, vendar MORAJO biti podprti zaradi preostale interoperabilnosti za preverjanje podpisov.
(RFC 1321) MUST NOT be used as a digest algorithm.
(RFC 1321) se NE SME uporabiti kot kodirni algoritem (digest algorithm).
Signers are referred to applicable national laws, and for the purposes of guidelines to ETSI TS 102 176 [4] and to the ECRYPT2 D.SPA.x report [5] for further recommendations on algorithms and parameters eligible for electronic signatures.The use of transforms is restricted to the ones listed below:
Podpisniki se sklicujejo na veljavne nacionalne zakone ter za namene smernic na ETSI TS 102176 [4] in poročilo ECRYPT2 D.SPA.x [5] za nadaljnja priporočila glede algoritmov in parametrov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za elektronske podpise.Uporaba transformacij je omejena na navedene spodaj:
Canonicalization transforms: see related specifications above;
Transformacije kanonikalizacije: glej zgoraj navedene ustrezne specifikacije;
for compatibility reasons and conformance with XMLDSig
zaradi združljivosti in usklajenosti z XMLDSig;
as a successor for XPath due to performance issues
kot naslednik XPath zaradi delovanja;
Enveloped signature transform: (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature).
Transformacija ovitega podpisa (enveloped signature): (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature).
XSLT (style sheet) transform.
Transformacija XSLT (datoteka s slogi).
The ds:KeyInfo element MUST include the signer’s X.509 v3 digital certificate (i.e. its value and not only a reference to it).
Element ds:KeyInfo MORA vključevati digitalno potrdilo X.509 v3 podpisnika (tj. njegovo vrednost in ne samo sklicevanje nanj).
The ‘SigningCertificate’ signed signature property MUST contain the digest value (CertDigest) and IssuerSerial of the signer’s certificate stored in ds:KeyInfo and the optional URI in ‘SigningCertificate’ field MUST NOT be used.
Značilnost podpisa „SigningCertificate“ (potrdilo podpisa) MORA vključevati kodirano vrednost (CertDigest) in serijsko številko (IssuerSerial) potrdila podpisnika, shranjenega v ds:KeyInfo. Neobvezne informacije URI v polju „SigningCertificate“ se NE SMEJO uporabiti.
The SigningTime signed signature property is present and contains the UTC expressed as xsd:dateTime (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#dateTime).
Značilnost podpisa „SigningTime“ (čas podpisa) je navedena in vključuje UTC, izražen v obliki xsd:dateTime (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#dateTime).
The DataObjectFormat element MUST BE present and contain MimeType sub-element.
Element DataObjectFormat (oblika podatkov) MORA biti naveden in vključevati podrejeni element MimeType.
In case the signatures used by Member States are based on a qualified certificate, the PKI objects (certificate chains, revocation data, time-stamps) that are included in the signatures are verifiable using the Trusted List, in accordance with Commission Decision 2009/767/EC, of the Member State who is supervising or accrediting the CSP having issued the signatory’s certificate.
Če podpisi, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, temeljijo na kvalificiranem potrdilu, je mogoče elemente PKI (verige potrdil, podatke o preklicu, časovne žige), ki so vključeni v podpise, v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2009/767/ES preveriti z uporabo zanesljivega seznama države članice, ki nadzira ali akreditira overitelja, ki je izdal potrdilo podpisnika.
Table 1 summarises the specifications that a XAdES-BES/EPES signature must comply with to be supported technically by the receiving Member State.
V preglednici 1 so povzete specifikacije, s katerimi mora biti usklajen podpis XAdES-BES/EPES, da ga lahko država članica prejemnica tehnično podpre.
SECTION 2 — CAdES-BES/EPES
ODDELEK 2 – CAdES-BES/EPES
The signature is conform with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Signature specifications [6].
Podpis je v skladu s specifikacijami podpisa Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS, sintaksa kriptografskega sporočila) [6].
The signature uses CAdES-BES (or -EPES) signature attributes as specified in the ETSI TS 101 733 CAdES specifications [7] and complies with the additional specifications as indicated in Table 2 below.
Podpis uporablja lastnosti podpisa CAdES-BES (ali -EPES), kot določajo specifikacije ETSI TS 101733 CAdES [7], in je v skladu z dodatnimi specifikacijami, kot so navedene v preglednici 2 spodaj.
All attributes of CAdES which are included in the archive timestamp hash calculation (ETSI TS 101 733 V1.8.1 Annex K) MUST be in DER encoding and any other can be in BER to simplify one-pass processing of CAdES.
Vse lastnosti CAdES, ki so vključene v razpršitveni izračun časovnega žiga za arhiv (ETSI TS 101733 V1.8.1, Priloga K), MORAJO biti kodirane v formatu DER, vse druge pa so lahko v formatu BER, da se poenostavi enkratna obdelava CAdES.