natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The period at issue runs until the day of recovery or — in the case the lease agreement was ended before recovery was ordered — the day the lease agreement was ended.
Zadevni rok teče do dneva vračila – ali na dan izteka najemne pogodbe, če se je najemna pogodba iztekla pred nalogom za izterjavo.
RECOVERY FROM AGVO
VRAČILO DRUŽBE AGVO
The aid to be recovered from AGVO is composed of the initial capital, the advantage derived from the provision of free guarantees for loans, the advantage derived from the exclusive use of the lands and buildings in the Ostend fishing port between 14 March 2002 and 25 March 2004 (for the buildings that were subsequently transferred to AGVO) and between 14 March 2002 and the day of recovery (for the rest of land and buildings that were not part of the property transfer deed concluded on 26 March 2004) and the advantage derived from the transfer on 26 March 2004, free of charge, of the ownership of 57500 m2 of buildings located in the Ostend fishing port.
Pomoč, ki jo mora vrniti družba AGVO, je sestavljena iz začetnega kapitala, ugodnosti, ki izhaja iz zagotovitve brezplačnih garancij za posojila, ugodnosti, ki izhaja iz izključne uporabe zemljišč in stavb v ribiškem pristanišču v Ostendeju med 14. marcem 2002 in 25. marcem 2004 (za stavbe, ki so bile naknadno prenesene družbi AGVO) ter med 14. marcem 2002 in dnevom vračila (za preostanek zemljišč in stavb, ki niso bili del listine o prenosu premoženja, sklenjene 26. marca 2004), in ugodnosti, ki izhaja iz brezplačnega prenosa lastništva stavb s površino 57500 m2 v ribiškem pristanišču v Ostendeju z dne 26. marca 2004.
So far as the initial capital is concerned, the information provided to the Commission shows that though the aid was granted for an amount of BEF 250 million (EUR 6200000), it has not been entirely paid out yet.
Kar zadeva začetni kapital, informacije, predložene Komisiji, kažejo, da pomoč še vedno ni bila izplačana v celoti, čeprav je bil odobren znesek v višini 250 milijonov BEF (6200000 EUR).
As for the aid element of the free guarantees, this is in principle the amount of the loans guaranteed, unless the Belgian authorities provide evidence that it would have been possible for AGVO to obtain such guarantees on the market; in that case, the aid element consists of what the likely market premium would have been for the guarantee, when they were agreed (26 March 2004, 23 April 2004 and 22 April 2005).
V zvezi z elementom pomoči za brezplačne garancije gre dejansko za znesek zajamčenih posojil, razen če belgijski organi zagotovijo dokaze, da bi lahko družba AGVO take garancije dobila na trgu; v tem primeru je element pomoči sestavljen iz mogoče tržne premije za garancijo, ko je bil dosežen dogovor (26. marca 2004, 23. aprila 2004 in 22. aprila 2005).
Where the market does not provide guarantees for the type of transaction concerned the aid element should be calculated in the same way as the grant equivalent of a soft loan, namely as the difference between the specific market interest rate AGVO would have borne without the guarantee and the interest rate obtained by means of the State guarantee.
Kadar trg ne zagotavlja garancij za zadevno vrsto prenosa, se mora element pomoči izračunati na enak način kot ekvivalent dodelitve ugodnega posojila, in sicer kot razlika med posebno tržno obrestno mero, ki bi veljala za družbo AGVO brez garancije, in obrestno mero, dobljeno z državnimi garancijami.
If there is no market interest rate and if the Member State wishes to use the reference rate as a proxy, the Commission stresses that the conditions laid down in the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates [70] are valid to calculate the aid intensity of an individual guarantee.
Če tržna obrestna mera ne obstaja in če želi država članica uporabiti referenčno vrednost kot približek, Komisija poudarja, da za izračun intenzivnosti pomoči posamezne garancije veljajo pogoji iz Sporočila Komisije o spremembi metode določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj [70].
This means that due attention must be paid to the top-up to be added to the base rate in order to take into account the relevant risk profile linked to the operation covered, the undertaking guaranteed and the collaterals provided.
To pomeni, da je treba ustrezno pozornost nameniti doplačilu k osnovni stopnji, da se upošteva ustrezen profil tveganja, povezan z zajeto dejavnostjo, zajamčeno garancijo in pridobljenim zavarovanjem.
So far as concerns the advantage derived from the exclusive use, free of charge of the lands and buildings of the Ostend fishing port, the aid amounts to the rent AGVO would have had to pay under market conditions for the exclusive use of the lands and buildings in the Ostend fishing port between 14 March 2002 and the day of recovery or the last day that AGVO had the right to use the buildings, free of charge, either on the basis of its articles of association, the Deed for transferring the ownership of the buildings or otherwise.
Kar zadeva ugodnost, ki izhaja iz izključne brezplačne uporabe zemljišč in stavb v ribiškem pristanišču v Ostendeju, je znesek pomoči na podlagi statuta družbe AGVO, listine o prenosu lastništva stavb ali česa drugega enak najemnini, ki bi jo morala družba AGVO plačati pod običajnimi tržnimi pogoji za izključno uporabo zemljišč in stavb v ribiškem pristanišču v Ostendeju med 14. marcem 2002 in dnevom vračila ali zadnjim dnevom, ko je družba AGVO še lahko brezplačno uporabljala prostore stavb.
The Commission is aware of the fact that part of the lands and buildings were of limited or no commercial value (for example the roads).
Komisija se zaveda dejstva, da je imel del zemljišč in stavb omejeno vrednost oziroma sploh ni imel tržne vrednosti (na primer ceste).
The Commission observes however, that part of the lands and buildings had a clear commercial value (fish auction, offices, warehouses) and that another part of the lands and buildings (infrastructure of the fishing port) allowed AGVO to provide services to vessel-owners and that AGVO had the right to levy a fee in exchange for the services provided.
Komisija kljub temu ugotavlja, da je del zemljišč in stavb imel jasno tržno vrednost (dražba rib, pisarne, skladišča) ter je ostali del zemljišč in stavb (infrastruktura ribiškega pristanišča) omogočil družbi AGVO, da je ta zagotovila storitve lastnikom plovil in je imela pravico do zaračunavanja dajatve v zameno za opravljene storitve.
These elements must be taken into account in order to calculate the rent.
Te podatke je treba upoštevati pri izračunu najemnine.
So far as the advantage derived from the collection of tax duties is concerned, the aid amounts to the tax collected since its establishment and the day of recovery or the last day AGVO was entitled to collect those duties.
Kar zadeva ugodnost, ki izhaja iz pobranih davčnih dajatev, je pomoč enaka znesku davkov, pobranih od njihove uvedbe in dneva vračila ali zadnjega dneva, na katerega je bila družba AGVO upravičena do pobiranja teh davkov.
Finally, the Commission notes that the amount to be recovered from AGVO should be diminished by the amount of aid that has been transferred to EVO in the form of capital (EUR 3969000) and free disposal of the buildings where the fish auction is operated.
Nazadnje, Komisija ugotavlja, da je treba znesek, ki ga mora družba AGVO vrniti, zmanjšati za znesek pomoči, ki je bil družbi EVO prenesen v obliki kapitala (3969000 EUR) in prostega razpolaganja s stavbami, v katerih je poslovala dražba rib.
The Commission is aware of the fact that AGVO was entrusted with some non-economic public tasks (inspection of fish landed for consumption, checking that the catch landed is subjected to the VAT requirement, public relations functions) and with the management of the fishing port.
Komisija se zaveda dejstva, da so bile družbi AGVO zaupane nekatere javne naloge, ki niso gospodarskega pomena (inšpekcijski nadzor iztovorjenih rib za potrošnjo, preverjanje, da iztovorjeni ulov izpolnjuje zahteve za DDV, naloge na področju odnosov z javnostmi), in upravljanje ribiškega pristanišča.
The Commission considers that the amount to be recovered from AGVO should be diminished by the costs for which it can be proved that they were made when discharging these tasks.
Komisija meni, da se mora znesek, ki ga mora družba AGVO vrniti, zmanjšati za stroške, za katere je mogoče dokazati, da so nastali med opravljanjem teh nalog.
IMPACT OF THE RESTRUCTURING OF THE FISH AUCTION ON THE RECOVERY ISSUE
VPLIV PRESTRUKTURIRANJA DRAŽBE RIB NA VRAČILA
The Belgian authorities have informed the Commission that the City and AGVO were planning to privatise the fish auction.
Belgijski organi so Komisijo obvestili, da sta mesto in družba AGVO načrtovala privatizacijo dražbe rib.
They have argued that once privatisation was completed, there would no longer be an issue of State aid and the procedure would be rendered devoid of purpose.
Trdili so, da po končani privatizaciji ne bo več vprašanj o državni pomoči, postopek pa bo brezpredmeten.
The Commission would recall in this regard that though the privatisation could put an end to the aid measures at issue, it does not erase the advantages granted to the beneficiaries of the aid for the period prior to the ending of the aid measures.
Komisija bi želela v zvezi s tem opozoriti, da kljub temu, da bi se s privatizacijo zaključili zadevni ukrepi pomoči, to ne uniči ugodnosti, dodeljenih upravičencem pomoči za obdobje pred iztekom ukrepov pomoči.
Recovery precisely serves the purpose of re-establishing the previously existing situation in order to ensure a level-playing field in the internal market.
Vračilo je natančneje namenjeno ponovni vzpostavitvi prejšnjih razmer, da se na notranjem trgu zagotovijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji.
The Commission draws the attention of the Belgian authorities in this respect to the Notice from the Commission ‘Towards an effective implementation of Commission Decisions ordering Member States to recover unlawful and incompatible State aid’ [71], in particular point 3.2.4 thereof which deals with the recovery of State aid from companies which are being wound up and insolvent beneficiaries.
Komisija v zvezi s tem belgijske organe opozarja na Obvestilo Komisije „Za učinkovito izvajanje odločb Komisije, ki od držav članic zahtevajo dosego vračila nezakonite in nezdružljive državne pomoči“ [71], zlasti na točko 3.2.4, ki obravnava vračilo državne pomoči s strani družb med likvidacijo in plačilno nesposobnih upravičencev.
As regards the request to postpone taking this Decision (see recital 99), that would be inappropriate since it is important that unlawful and incompatible State aid be recovered as quickly as possible,
Kar zadeva zahtevek za odlog sprejetja odločitve (iz uvodne izjave 99), bi bilo to neustrezno, saj je pomembno, da se nezakonita in nezdružljiva državna pomoč čim prej vrneta –
The aid granted to NV Exploitatie Vismijn Oostende (EVO) for an amount of EUR 3969000 in the form of an initial capital and loans which were later transformed into capital increases is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi NV Exploitatie Vismijn Oostende (EVO) v višini 3969000 EUR, v obliki začetnega kapitala in posojil, ki so se pozneje preoblikovali v povečanja kapitala, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to EVO for an amount of EUR 4284995 in the form of free guarantees for loans is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi EVO v višini 4284995 EUR v obliki brezplačnih garancij za posojila, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to EVO in the form of the right to use, free of charge, the buildings of the fish auction located in the Ostend fishing port, is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi EVO v obliki pravice do brezplačne uporabe stavb dražbe rib v ribiškem pristanišču v Ostendeju, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to Autonoom Gemeentebedrijf Vismijn Oostende (AGVO) for an amount of EUR 6200000 in the form of an initial capital is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi Autonoom Gemeentebedrijf Vismijn Oostende (AGVO) v višini 6200000 EUR v obliki začetnega kapitala, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to AGVO in the form of free guarantees for loans is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi EVO v obliki brezplačnih garancij za posojila, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to AGVO in the form of the right to use, free of charge and/or at a rate below the market price, lands and buildings located in the Ostend fishing port, is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi AGVO v obliki pravice do brezplačne uporabe zemljišč in stavb v ribiškem pristanišču v Ostendeju in/ali uporabe teh po nižji tržni ceni, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to AGVO in the form of the transfer of ownership, free of charge, between 26 March 2004 and 4 September 2009, of 57500 m2 of buildings located in the Ostend fishing port is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi AGVO v obliki brezplačnega prenosa lastništva stavb s površino 57500 m2 v ribiškem pristanišču v Ostendeju med 26. marcem 2004 in 4. septembrom 2009, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to AGVO in the form of the right to collect tax duties since 14 March 2002 is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, dodeljena družbi EVO v obliki pravice do pobiranja davčnih dajatev od 14. marca 2002, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
The aid granted to NV Pakhuizen (PAKHUIZEN) and resulting from the long-term lease agreement concluded in 1989 with the City of Ostend, is incompatible with the internal market.
Pomoč, ki je bila dodeljena družbi NV Pakhuizen (PAKHUIZEN) in izhaja iz dolgoročne najemne pogodbe, sklenjene z mestom Ostende leta 1989, je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom.
Belgium shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1 and Article 2(2) to (5) from the beneficiaries.
Upravičenci morajo Belgiji vrniti pomoč iz člena 1 in člena 2(2) do (5).
Belgium shall recover the aid referred to in Article 2(1) to the extent it has already been paid to AGVO (EUR 3596665,62).
Belgija mora vrniti pomoč iz člena 2(1), ki je že bila plačana družbi AGVO (3596665,62 EUR).
Belgium shall recover the aid referred to in Article 3 to the extent it has been granted since 13 March 1996.
Belgija mora vrniti pomoč iz člena 3, ki se je dodeljevala od 13. marca 1996.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were placed at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery or the last date on which they were placed at the disposal of the beneficiaries, should the aid measures have ended before recovery took place.
Zneski, ki jih je treba vrniti, morajo vključevati obresti od datuma, na katerega so bili upravičencem na voljo, do dejanskega vračila ali zadnjega dne, na katerega so bili upravičencem na voljo, če so se ukrepi pomoči končali pred vračilom.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [72] and with Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 [73] amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [72] in Uredbo (ES) št. 271/2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 [73].
Belgium shall cancel all outstanding payments of and/or other forms of granting the aid referred to in Articles 1, 2 and 3 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Belgija prekliče vsa neporavnana plačila in/ali druge oblike dodelitve pomoči iz členov 1, 2 in 3 z začetkom veljavnosti od datuma sprejetja tega sklepa.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Articles 1, 2 and 3 shall be immediate and effective.
Vračilo pomoči iz členov 1, 2 in 3 se izvede takoj in učinkovito.
Belgium shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of its notification.
Belgija zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih od datuma njegove priglasitve.
Within two months of notification of this Decision, Belgium shall submit the following information to the Commission:
V dveh mesecih od priglasitve tega sklepa predloži Belgija Komisiji naslednje informacije:
the total amount (principal and recovery interest) to be recovered from AGVO, EVO and PAKHUIZEN;
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti vračila), ki ga morajo družbe AGVO, EVO in PAKHUIZEN vrniti;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
natančen opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s tem sklepom;
documents demonstrating that AGVO, EVO and PAKHUIZEN have been ordered to repay the aid.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da se je od družb AGVO, EVO in PAKHUIZEN zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
Belgium shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Articles 1 to 3 has been completed.
Belgija obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se vračanje pomoči iz členov 1 do 3 ne konča.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Belgija takoj predloži vse informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom, ki jih zahteva Komisija.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from AGVO, EVO and PAKHUIZEN.
Zagotovi tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za povračilo pomoči, ki so jih družbe AGVO, EVO in PAKHUIZEN že povrnile.
OJ C 238, 17.9.2008, p. 12.
UL C 238, 17.9.2008, str. 12.
From 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’).
Člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES sta s 1. decembrom 2009 postala člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty where appropriate.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanja na člena 107 in 108 PDEU razumeti kot sklicevanja na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
De Belgische Zeevisserij — Anvoer en Besomming 2007, Vlaamse overheid, Departement Landbouw en Visserij (http://www2.vlaanderen.be/landbouw/downloads/vis/aanvoer_besomming_2007.pdf), p. 12.
De Belgische Zeevisserij – Anvoer en Besomming 2007, Vlaamse overheid, Departement Landbouw en Visserij (http://www2.vlaanderen.be/landbouw/downloads/vis/aanvoer_besomming_2007.pdf), str. 12.
AGVO was established on 23 November 2001 by the City.
Mesto je družbo AGVO ustanovilo 23. novembra 2001.
This decision of the City was approved on 14 March 2002 by the Flemish Minister for internal affairs.
Ta sklep mesta je 14. marca 2002 odobril flamski minister za notranje zadeve.
Project consisting of fishing/buying crab in Norway in order to (try) to sell it on the Asian market.
Projekt, ki vključuje lov/nakup rakovic na Norveškem ter prodajo (ali poskus prodaje) na azijskem trgu.
Jaarrekening AGVO 2005, p. 26 (verslag van de Raad van Bestuur aan de aandeelhouders over de waardering van de aandelen in EVO): ‘Tenslotte is het niet onbelangrijk dat in deze fase de engagementen van de Stad Oostende een wezenlijke buffer vormen om op verantwoorde wijze een waardering in going concern toe te passen zodat de waardering zoals beschreven in art. 66§2 mag aangehouden worden en niet naar een waardering in discontinuïteit moet overgegangen worden.’
Jaarrekening AGVO 2005, str. 26 (verslag van de Raad van Bestuur aan de aandeelhouders over de waardering van de aandelen in EVO): „Tenslotte is het niet onbelangrijk dat in deze fase de engagementen van de Stad Oostende een wezenlijke buffer vormen om op verantwoorde wijze een waardering in going concern toe te passen zodat de waardering zoals beschreven in art. 66§2 mag aangehouden worden en niet naar een waardering in discontinuïteit moet overgegangen worden“.
OJ C 19, 20.1.2001, p. 7; OJ C 229, 14.9.2004, p. 5; OJ C 84, 3.4.2008, p. 10.
UL C 19, 20.1.2001, str. 7; UL C 229, 14.9.2004, str. 5; UL C 84, 3.4.2008, str. 10.
Judgment in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark [2003] ECR I-7747.
Sodba v zadevi C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium MagdeburgprotiNahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark, Recueil 2003, str. I-7747.
Judgments in Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser [1991] ECR I-1979, paragraph 21; Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01 AOK Bundesverband [2004] ECR I-2493, paragraph 46; C-222/04 Ministero dell’Economia v Cassa di Risparmio [2006] ECR I-289, paragraphs 107-112.
Sodba v zadevi C-41/90, Höfner in Elser, Recueil 1979, str. I-1979, točka 21; sodba v združenih zadevah C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 in C-355/01, AOK Bundesverband, Recueil 2004, str. I-2493, točka 46; sodba v zadevi C-222/04 Ministero dell’Economiaproti Cassa di Risparmio, ZOdl. 2006, str. I-289, točke 107-112.
Judgments in Case C-82/01 P Aéroports de Paris v Commission [2002] ECR I-9297, paragraph 78, and Case T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris v Commission [2002] ECR II-3929, paragraphs 122-124.
Sodba v zadevi C-82/01 P, Aéroports de Pariz proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. I-9297, točka 78; sodba v zadevi T-128/98, Aéroports de Pariz proti Komisiji, Recueil 2000, str. II-3929, točke 122–124.
Decision of 20 October 2004, N 520/03 — Flemish ports; Decision of 24 April 2007, N 60/06 — Project Mainportontwikkeling.
Odločba z dne 20. oktobra 2004, št. 520/2003 – flamska pristanišča; Odločba z dne 24. aprila 2007, št. 60/2006 – projekt Mainportontwikkeling.
Case C-222/04, cited above, paragraphs 110-117.
Sodba v zadevi C-222/04, že navedena zgoraj, točke 110–117.
Judgments in Case C-334/99 Germany v Commission [2003] ECR I-1139, paragraph 133; in Case C-482/99 France v Commission (Stardust Marine) [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraph 70; in Case C-261/89 Italy v Commission [1990] ECR I-4437, paragraph 8; in Joined Cases C-278/92 to C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraph 21 and in Case C-42/93 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4175, paragraph 13.
Sodba v zadevi C-334/99, Zvezna republika Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str. I-01139, točka 133; sodba v zadevi C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji (Stardust Marine), Recueil 2002, str. I-4397, točka 70; sodba v zadevi C-261/89, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1990, str. I-4437, točka 8; sodba v združenih zadevah C-278/92 d°C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str. I-4103, točka 21; sodba v zadevi C-42/93, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str. I-4175, točka 13.
At the time, the City was faced with an average annual loss of EUR 1850000.
Mesto se je takrat soočilo s povprečnimi letnimi izgubami v višini 1850000 EUR.
Judgments in Case T-152/99 HAMSA v Commission [2002] ECR II-3049, paragraph 132; in Joined Cases C-328/99 to C-399/00 Italy and SIM 2 Multimedia v Commission [2003] ECR I-4035, paragraph 44 and in C-303/88 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraphs 18 et seq.
Sodba v zadevi T-152/99, HAMSA proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str. II-3049, točka 132; sodba v združenih zadevah C-328/99 in C-399/00, Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str. I-4035, točka 44; sodba v zadevi C-303/88, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1991, str. I-1433, točka 18 in naslednja.
Judgments in Case C-482/99, cited above, paragraph 71; in Case T-16/96 Cityflyer Express v Commission [1998] ECR II-757, paragraph 76; in Joined Cases T-228/99 to T-233/99 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Commission [2003] ECR II-435, paragraph 246.
Sodba v zadevi C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji (Stardust Marine), že navedena, točka 71; sodba v zadevi T-16/96, Cityflyer Express proti Komisiji, že navedena, točka 76; sodba v združenih zadevah T-228/99 in T-233/99, Westdeutsche LB proti Komisiji, že navedena, točka 246.