natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, for those proposals passing the thresholds, a factor, which will be determined in the work program, will be applied as a multiple of the number of proposals that could be financed for the particular call (based on the average cost of a proposal from the previous call for the given activity).
Poleg tega se za tiste predloge, ki dosežejo pragove, uporabi faktor, določen v delovnem programu, kot večkratnik števila predlogov, ki bi lahko prejeli sredstva iz določenega razpisa (na podlagi povprečnega stroška predloga iz prejšnjega razpisa za določeno aktivnost).
This factor establishes the number of submissions passing to the second step and the corresponding budgetary cut-off level.
Ta faktor določa število predlogov, ki so posredovani na drugo stopnjo, in pripadajočo proračunsko presečno vrednost.
Proposals with a score passing the thresholds and in addition with a score above this cut off level will pass to the second step of evaluation where the full set of evaluation criteria will be evaluated.
Predlogi, ki po ocenah dosegajo pragove, in z rezultatom nad navedeno presečno vrednostjo, se posredujejo na drugo stopnjo ocenjevanja, na kateri se zanje uporablja celoten skupek ocenjevalnih meril.
(All proposals with identical scores at the cut off level will pass through to the second step of evaluation).
(Vsi predlogi z enakimi ocenami na zgoraj navedeni presečni ravni se posredujejo na drugo stopnjo ocenjevanja).
Thresholds and weightings to be applied in the first and second steps of evaluation, the criteria to be applied at each step, and the multiple, will be published in the work programme.
Pragovi in ponderji, ki se uporabljajo na prvi in drugi stopnji ocenjevanja, merila za vsako stopnjo in večkratnik bodo objavljeni v delovnem programu.
In addition to the eligibility criteria described in section 2.5, Marie Curie actions have a set of eligibility criteria that are defined in the work programme.
Poleg meril za upravičenost, ki so opisana v oddelku 2.5, se za ukrepe Marie Curie uporablja skupek meril za upravičenost, ki so opredeljena v delovnem programu.
In the case of a single step submission with a two step evaluation, a proposal will be considered ineligible if it does not consist of one Part A, one Part B1 and one Part B2, where Part B1 and Part B2 have to be different.
V primeru enostopenjskega postopka oddaje z ocenjevanjem v dveh korakih se šteje, da predlog ni upravičen, če ni sestavljen iz dela A, dela B1 in dela B2, pri čemer se morata del B1 in del B2 razlikovati.
Procedure for transferring proposals between calls
Postopek za prerazporejanje predlogov med razpisi
For Marie Curie individual fellowships, if a proposal is ineligible in a call but is eligible in another open call (i.e. the submission of the proposal in the original call was made prior to the deadline of the new call), then the proposal will be transferred to that call.
Če je v okviru individualnih štipendij Marie Curie nek predlog neupravičen pri enem razpisu, vendar upravičen pri drugem odprtem razpisu (in je bil predlog za prvotni razpis oddan pred rokom novega razpisa), se predlog prerazporedi v ta razpis.
The transfer procedure is as follow:
Postopek prerazporeditve je naslednji:
declare the proposal ineligible in the original call;
razglasitev, da predlog v prvotnem razpisu ni upravičen,
obtain a new proposal number from the ESP (Evaluation Service Provider) in the new call;
pridobitev nove številke predloga od ponudnika ocenjevalnih storitev v novem razpisu,
inform the applicant of the transfer.
obveščanje vložnika o prerazporeditvi.
Scores, weightings and thresholds
Ocene, ponderji in pragovi
The scores awarded by evaluators will normally be given in a range of 0 to 5 as indicated in section 3.6.
Ocene, ki jih dodelijo ocenjevalci, se običajno gibljejo v razponu od 0 do 5, kot je opisano v oddelku 3.6.
Due to the large number of proposals submitted to some activities, scores may be awarded with a resolution of one decimal place.
Zaradi številnih predlogov, predloženih za določene aktivnosti, ocenjevalci lahko dodelijo ocene z natančnostjo na eno decimalno mesto.
After individual evaluation the evaluators may see the scores and comments of other relevant evaluators.
Po končanem individualnem ocenjevanju lahko ocenjevalci dobijo na vpogled ocene in pripombe drugih zadevnih ocenjevalcev.
Evaluators may revise their scores taking into account the views of other evaluators at consensus report level.
Ocenjevalci lahko ob upoštevanju mnenj drugih ocenjevalcev na stopnji poročila o soglasju spremenijo svoje ocene.
The Commission records draft scores and comments as well as their evolution.
Komisija zapiše začetne ocene in pripombe ter njihov razvoj.
The evaluation criteria will be defined in the work programme.
Merila za ocenjevanje bodo opredeljena v delovnem programu.
Comments from evaluators
Pripombe ocenjevalcev
Comments will be provided by evaluators for each block of criteria.
Ocenjevalci podajo pripombe za vsak skupek meril.
Approval of individual assessments reports and consensus reports
Potrjevanje poročil o individualnem ocenjevanju in poročil o soglasju
Evaluators may approve their individual assessment reports and consensus reports electronically.
Ocenjevalci lahko potrdijo svoja poročila o individualnem ocenjevanju in poročila o soglasju v elektronski obliki.
Role of Chairs and vice-chairs
Vloga predsednikov in podpredsednikov
In order to help with the management of the evaluation, the Commission may appoint independent experts as Chairs and vice-chairs.
Komisija lahko imenuje neodvisne strokovnjake kot predsednike ali podpredsednike za pomoč pri vodenju ocenjevanja.
The role of the chairs consists of helping the panel coordinator in order to run the evaluation in the most efficient way.
Predsedniki pomagajo koordinatorju odbora pri čim učinkovitejšem vodenju ocenjevanja.
The role of the vice-chair consists of helping the panel coordinator and the chair person in order to run the evaluation in the most efficient way.
Podpredsedniki pomagajo koordinatorju odbora in predsedniku pri čim učinkovitejšem vodenju ocenjevanja.
Chairs and vice-chairs generally perform the role of moderator in consensus discussions, as described under section 3.8(c) of these rules.
Predsedniki in podpredsedniki imajo običajno vlogo moderatorja v razpravah za doseganje soglasja, kakor je opisano v oddelku 3.8(c) teh pravil.
Evaluators conflict of interest
Navzkrižje interesov ocenjevalcev
In addition to the conflicts of interest mentioned in Annex F (attached to the appointment letter), the following disqualifying conflict of interest will be taken into account:
Poleg navzkrižij interesov, ki so navedena v Prilogi F (priložena k obvestilu o imenovanju), se upošteva tudi naslednje izključitveno navzkrižje interesov:
the expert is acting as a referee of the applicant.
Strokovnjak deluje kot razsodnik v odnosu do prijavitelja.
Remote consensus process
Postopek doseganja soglasja na daljavo
Consensus scores may be derived, where appropriate, by averaging the scores of evaluators and this process may be widely applied where remote evaluation is used.
Kjer je to primerno, rezultati doseganja soglasja temeljijo na izračunu povprečja ocen ocenjevalcev, ta postopek pa se lahko širše uporablja pri ocenjevanju na daljavo.
Consensus reports may be prepared by a “rapporteur”, taking into account the views of remote evaluators and approved by, possibly electronically, at least two expert evaluators.
Poročila o soglasju pripravi ‚poročevalec‘ ob upoštevanju mnenj ocenjevalcev na daljavo, ki sta jih, če je mogoče v elektronski obliki, potrdila najmanj dva strokovna ocenjevalca.
Annex A — Ethical review procedures
Priloga A – Postopki etične presoje
Annex B — Handling security-sensitive RTD actions
Priloga B – Obravnava varnostno občutljivih ukrepov RTR
Proposals are submitted in response to calls for proposals (“calls”) [12].
Predlogi se pošljejo kot odgovor na razpise za zbiranje predlogov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: razpisi) [12].
The content and timing of calls are set out in the work programmes.
Vsebina in časovni razpored razpisov sta določena v delovnih programih.
Hearings provide input to clarify further the proposals and to help the panel to establish their final rating and scores for the proposals.
Zaslišanja omogočajo dodatno pojasnitev predlogov, odboru pa pomagajo pri končni razvrstitvi ter oceni predlogov.
They are intended to improve the understanding of the experts of the proposal but not to modify or improve in any way the proposal itself.
Pri strokovnjakih nameravajo izboljšati razumevanje predlogov, ne pa tudi spreminjati ali kakor koli izboljševati samih predlogov.
Any step(s) of research of such kind will have to be excluded from the research activities that will be supported by Union funds in line with the Commission’s declaration of 24 July 2006.
Vse take raziskovalne korake je treba izključiti iz raziskovalnih dejavnosti, ki bodo podprte s sredstvi Unije, v skladu z izjavo Komisije z dne 24. julija 2006.
The exclusion of funding of this step of research will not prevent Union funding of subsequent steps involving hESC.
Izključitev teh raziskovalnih korakov iz financiranja ne preprečuje Uniji, da financira poznejše korake, ki vključujejo človeške zarodne izvorne celice.
A disqualifying conflict of interest exists if an expert:
Izključitveno navzkrižje interesov obstaja, če je strokovnjak:
5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 Important: Claims for reimbursement based on this Annex should be sent in a single reimbursement of expenses form.
Pomembno: Zahtevki za povračilo, ki temeljijo na tej prilogi, se pošljejo v obliki obrazca za enkratno povračilo stroškov.
These general conditions apply to appointment letters for experts assisting the Commission’s services for tasks in connection with the Seventh Framework Programme [of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) [1] (“EC FP7”)] [of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) for nuclear research and training activities (2007 to 2011) [2] (“Euratom FP7”)]. Circumstances in which a conflict of interest may exist
Ti splošni pogoji se uporabljajo za obvestila o imenovanju strokovnjakov, ki pomagajo službam Komisije pri nalogah, povezanih s Sedmim okvirnim programom [Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (ES 7OP)] [1] [Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo (Euratom) za jedrske raziskave in dejavnosti usposabljanja (2007–2011) (Euratom 7OP)] [2].Okoliščine obstoja navzkrižja interesov
an evaluation summary report (ESR) for each proposal, including comments and scores, taking account of any hearings. Where relevant, any ethical issues and any security considerations are reported,
zbirno poročilo o ocenjevanju za vsak predlog, vključno s pripombami in ocenami, ob upoštevanju morebitnih zaslišanj; poročilo o etičnih in varnostnih vprašanjih, kjer je ustrezno,
a copy of the “Facility Security Clearances” (FSC) (or the FSC requests). The validity of the FSC will be checked by the Commission Security Directorate through the appropriate formal channel with the “National Security Authorities” (NSAs) involved,
kopija ‚varnostnega potrdila za objekt‘ (VPOB) (ali zahtevka za VPOB); veljavnost VPOB preveri Varnostni direktorat Evropske komisije po ustrezni uradni poti z vključitvijo ‚nacionalnih varnostnih organov‘ (NVO),
It works independently. The committee itself does not evaluate the proposal.
Odbor deluje neodvisno, vendar sam po sebi predloga ne ocenjuje.
of 14 March 2011
z dne 14. marca 2011
establishing the position to be taken by the European Union within the fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Rotterdam Convention as regards the amendments to Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade
o določitvi stališča, ki ga zavzame Evropska unija v okviru petega zasedanja Konference pogodbenic Rotterdamske konvencije glede sprememb Priloge III k Rotterdamski konvenciji o postopku soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju za določene nevarne kemikalije in pesticide v mednarodni trgovini
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 192 and 207, in conjunction with Article 218(9), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti členov 192 in 207, v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
The European Union has approved the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade (the ‘Rotterdam Convention’) by Council Decision 2006/730/EC [1].
(1) Evropska unija je odobrila Rotterdamsko konvencijo o postopku soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju za določene nevarne kemikalije in pesticide v mednarodni trgovini (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Rotterdamska konvencija) s Sklepom Sveta 2006/730/ES [1].
Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals [2] implements the Rotterdam Convention in the Union.
Rotterdamska konvencija se v Uniji izvaja v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij [2].
In order to ensure that importing countries benefit from the protection offered by the Rotterdam Convention, it is necessary and appropriate to support the recommendation from the Chemical Review Committee as regards the inclusion in Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention of chrysotile asbestos, endosulfan, alachlor and aldicarb.
Da se državam uvoznicam zagotovi varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja Rotterdamska konvencija, je nujno in primerno podpreti priporočilo odbora za pregled kemikalij glede vključitve krizotilnega azbesta, endosulfana, alaklora in aldikarba v Prilogo III k Rotterdamski konvenciji.
These four substances are already banned or severely restricted in the Union and are therefore subject to export requirements which go beyond what is required under the Rotterdam Convention.
Te štiri snovi so v Uniji že prepovedane ali pa je njihova uporaba strogo omejena in zato zanje veljajo strožje izvozne zahteve kot tiste, določene v Rotterdamski konvenciji.
The fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Rotterdam Convention is expected to take decisions on the proposed amendments to Annex III.
Na petem zasedanju Konference pogodbenic Rotterdamske konvencije naj bi se sprejeli sklepi o predlaganih spremembah Priloge III.
The Union should support the adoption of these amendments,
Unija bi morala sprejetje teh sprememb podpreti –
The position to be taken by the Union at the fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties of the Rotterdam Convention is that the Commission shall, on behalf of the Union, as regards matters falling within the Union’s competence, support the adoption of the amendments to Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade [3] as regards the inclusion of chrysotile asbestos, endosulfan, alachlor and aldicarb.Article 2
Stališče, ki ga zavzame Unija na petem zasedanju Konference pogodbenic Rotterdamske konvencije je, da Komisija, v zadevah, ki spadajo v pristojnost Unije, v imenu Unije podpre sprejetje sprememb Priloge III k Rotterdamski konvenciji o postopku soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju za določene nevarne kemikalije in pesticide v mednarodni trgovini [3] glede vključitve krizotilnega azbesta, endosulfana, alaklora in aldikarba v Prilogo III.Člen 2
This Decision is addressed to the Commission.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Komisijo.
Done at Brussels, 14 March 2011.
V Bruslju, 14. marca 2011
on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Article 29 of Council Directive 96/23/EC
o odobritvi načrtov, ki so jih predložile tretje države v skladu s členom 29 Direktive Sveta 96/23/ES
Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC [1], and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 29(1) and Article 29(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 96/23/ES z dne 29. aprila 1996 o ukrepih za spremljanje nekaterih snovi in njihovih ostankov v živih živalih in v živalskih proizvodih ter razveljavitvi direktiv 85/358/EGS in 86/469/EGS in odločb 89/187/EGS in 91/664/EGS [1] ter zlasti četrtega pododstavka člena 29(1) in (2) Direktive,
Directive 96/23/EC lays down measures to monitor the substances and groups of residues listed in Annex I thereto.
Direktiva 96/23/ES določa ukrepe za spremljanje snovi in skupin ostankov snovi, ki so navedene v Prilogi I k Direktivi.
Pursuant to Directive 96/23/EC, the inclusion and retention on the lists of third countries from which Member States are authorised to import animals and animal products covered by that Directive are subject to the submission by the third countries concerned of a plan setting out the guarantees which they offer as regards the monitoring of the groups of residues and substances listed in that Annex.
V skladu z Direktivo 96/23/ES morajo zadevne tretje države za vključitev na sezname tretjih držav, iz katerih države članice lahko uvažajo živali in živalske proizvode, ki jih zajema navedena direktiva, ter za ohranitev na teh seznamih predložiti načrte z jamstvi, ki jih zagotavljajo v zvezi z nadzorom skupin ostankov in snovi iz navedene priloge.
Commission Decision 2004/432/EC of 29 April 2004 on the approval of residue monitoring plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Council Directive 96/23/EC [2] approves the plans provided for in Article 29 of Directive 96/23/EC (the plans) submitted by certain third countries listed in the Annex thereto for the animals and animal products indicated in that list.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2004/432/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o odobritvi načrtov nadzora nad ostanki škodljivih snovi, predloženih s strani tretjih držav v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 96/23/ES [2], so se za živali in živalske proizvode z navedenega seznama odobrili načrti iz člena 29 Direktive 96/23/ES (v nadaljnjem besedilu: načrti), ki so jih predložile nekatere tretje države iz Priloge k Odločbi.
In the light of the recent plans submitted by certain third countries and additional information obtained by the Commission, it is necessary to update the list of third countries from which Member States are authorised to import certain animals and animal products, as provided for in Directive 96/23/EC and currently listed in the Annex to Decision 2004/432/EC (the list).
Glede na nedavne načrte, ki so jih predložile nekatere tretje države, in dodatne informacije, ki jih je pridobila Komisija, je treba posodobiti seznam tretjih držav, iz katerih je državam članicam dovoljeno uvažati nekatere živali in živalske proizvode kot določa Direktiva 96/23/ES in ki so trenutno navedeni v Prilogi k Odločbi 2004/432/ES (v nadaljnjem besedilu: seznam).
The United Arab Emirates has submitted a plan for camel milk to the Commission.
Združeni arabski emirati so Komisiji predložili načrt za kamelje mleko.
That plan provides sufficient guarantees and should be approved.
Navedeni načrt zadostuje kot jamstvo in ga je treba odobriti.
Therefore, camel milk should be included in the entry for the United Arab Emirates in the list.
Kamelje mleko je zato treba vključiti v vnos za Združene arabske emirate na seznamu.
Brunei has submitted a plan for aquaculture to the Commission.
Brunej je predložil Komisiji načrt za akvakulturo.
Therefore, Brunei should be included in the list as regards aquaculture.
Brunej je zato treba vključiti na seznam glede akvakulture.
The Commission requested that the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia provide information on the implementation of its plan for equidae for slaughter.
Komisija je zahtevala, da Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija zagotovi informacije o izvajanju svojega načrta za enoprste kopitarje za zakol.
In the absence of a reply from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia there are not sufficient guarantees for approval.
Če Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija ne odgovori, ni zadostnega jamstva za odobritev.
The entry for that third country concerning equidae for slaughter should therefore be deleted from the list.
Vnos za navedeno tretjo državo glede enoprstih kopitarjev za zakol je zato treba črtati s seznama.
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has been informed accordingly.
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija je bila ustrezno obveščena.
The entry for Malaysia in the list includes poultry but the plan provided by Malaysia and the additional information obtained by the Commission do not provide sufficient guarantees in respect of poultry.
Vnos za Malezijo na seznamu vključuje perutnino, vendar načrt, ki ga je zagotovila Malezija, in dodatne informacije, ki jih je pridobila Komisija, ne zadostujejo kot jamstvo za perutnino.
However, the only establishment processing such raw material currently approved in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption [3] imports all its raw material from a Member State.
Vendar edini obrat, ki predeluje take surovine in je trenutno odobren v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 854/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o določitvi posebnih predpisov za organizacijo uradnega nadzora proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi [3], uvaža vse svoje surovine iz države članice.
In order to permit the continuation of that activity, the entry for Malaysia should include poultry but it should be restricted to raw material imported from other third countries included in the list for such material or from Member States.
Da se omogoči nadaljevanje navedene dejavnosti, mora vnos za Malezijo vključevati perutnino, vendar se mora omejiti na surovine, uvožene iz drugih tretjih držav, ki so vključene na seznamu za tako surovino, ali držav članic.
Malaysia has been informed accordingly.
Malezija je bila ustrezno obveščena.
A footnote setting out this limitation should be included in the list for that third country.
Na seznam za navedeno tretjo državo je treba vključiti opombo, ki določa to omejitev.
The Commission requested that Russia provide information on the implementation of its plan for equidae for slaughter.
Komisija je zahtevala, da Rusija zagotovi informacije o izvajanju svojega načrta za enoprste kopitarje za zakol.
In the absence of a reply from Russia there are not sufficient guarantees for approval.
Če Rusija ne odgovori, ni zadostnega jamstva za odobritev.
The entry for that third country concerning equidae for slaughter should be deleted from the list.
Vnos za navedeno tretjo državo glede enoprstih kopitarjev za zakol je zato treba črtati s seznama.
Russia has been informed accordingly.
Rusija je bila ustrezno obveščena.
The Commission requested that Ukraine provide information on the implementation of its plan for equine animals and products.
Komisija je zahtevala, da Ukrajina zagotovi informacije o izvajanju svojega načrta za enoprste kopitarje in proizvode iz njih.
In the absence of a reply from Ukraine there are not sufficient guarantees for approval.
Če Ukrajina ne odgovori, ni zadostnega jamstva za odobritev.
The entry for that third country concerning equine animals and products should be deleted from the list.
Vnos za navedeno tretjo državo glede enoprstih kopitarjev in proizvodov iz njih je zato treba črtati s seznama.
Ukraine has been informed accordingly.
Ukrajina je bila ustrezno obveščena.
The United States has been asked to provide information on the implementation of its plan for equine animals and products.
Komisija je zahtevala, da Združene države zagotovijo informacije o izvajanju svojega načrta za enoprste kopitarje in proizvode iz njih.