natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The exemption shall take effect in relation to each party as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Izvzetje začne veljati z dnem iz stolpca „Začetek veljavnosti“.
List of parties to be exempt
Seznam izvzetih strani
The requests for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty submitted pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 by the parties listed below in table 2 are hereby rejected.
Zahtevki za izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve, ki so jih predložile strani iz razpredelnice 2 v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97, se zavrnejo.
The suspension of payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 is hereby lifted for the parties concerned as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Opustitev plačila razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97 je s tem od datuma iz stolpca „Začetek veljavnosti“ ukinjena za zadevne strani.
List of parties for which the suspension is to be lifted
Seznam strani, za katere se opustitev ukine
The exemptions from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 for the parties listed below in table 3 are to be revoked pursuant to Article 10 of the exemption Regulation.
Izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97 za strani iz razpredelnice 3 je treba razveljaviti v skladu s členom 10 uredbe o izvzetju.
The exemption from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty is hereby lifted for the parties concerned as from the relevant date shown in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve se s tem ukine za zadevne strani od datuma iz stolpca „Začetek veljavnosti“.
List of parties for which the exemption is to be lifted
Seznam strani, za katere se izvzetje ukine
1 day after publication of the present Decision
en dan po objavi tega sklepa
The parties listed in table 4 below constitute the updated list of parties under examination pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97.
Strani iz razpredelnice 4 sestavljajo posodobljen seznam strani v pregledu v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97.
The suspension from the extended duty, following these requests, took effect from the relevant date in the column headed ‘Date of effect’ in Table 4.
Opustitev razširjene dajatve je po teh zahtevkih začela veljati od datuma iz stolpca „Začetek veljavnosti“ razpredelnice 4.
List of parties under examination
Seznam strani v pregledu
This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to the parties listed in Article 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice in strani iz členov 1, 2, 3 in 4.
It is also published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Objavi se tudi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ C 45, 13.2.1997, p. 3, OJ C 112, 10.4.1997, p. 9, OJ C 220, 19.7.1997, p. 6, OJ C 378, 13.12.1997, p. 2, OJ C 217, 11.7.1998, p. 9, OJ C 37, 11.2.1999, p. 3, OJ C 186, 2.7.1999, p. 6, OJ C 216, 28.7.2000, p. 8, OJ C 170, 14.6.2001, p. 5, OJ C 103, 30.4.2002, p. 2, OJ C 35, 14.2.2003, p. 3, OJ C 43, 22.2.2003, p. 5, OJ C 54, 2.3.2004, p. 2, OJ C 299, 4.12.2004, p. 4, OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 16 and OJ L 313, 14.11.2006, p. 5., OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 73., OJ C 310, 5.12.2008, p. 19., OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62., OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 106.
UL C 45, 13.2.1997, str. 3. UL C 112, 10.4.1997, str. 9. UL C 220, 19.7.1997, str. 6. UL C 378, 13.12.1997, str. 2. UL C 217, 11.7.1998, str. 9. UL C 37, 11.2.1999, str. 3. UL C 186, 2.7.1999, str. 6. UL C 216, 28.7.2000, str. 8. UL C 170, 14.6.2001, str. 5. UL C 103, 30.4.2002, str. 2. UL C 35, 14.2.2003, str. 3. UL C 43, 22.2.2003, str. 5. UL C 54, 2.3.2004, str. 2. UL C 299, 4.12.2004, str. 4. UL L 17, 21.1.2006, str. 16 in UL L 313, 14.11.2006, str. 5., UL L 81, 20.3.2008, str. 73., UL C 310, 5.12.2008, str. 19., UL L 19, 23.1.2009, str. 62., UL L 314, 1.12.2009, str. 106.
OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 106.
UL L 314, 1.12.2009, str. 106.
This period was defined as from 1 January 2010 to 31 August 2010.
Obdobje je bilo določeno od 1. januarja 2010 do 31. avgusta 2010.
Further information from the years 2008 and 2009 were also requested.
Prav tako so bile zahtevane informacije iz let 2008 in 2009.
(postal code will change to 20847)
(poštna številka bo spremenjena na 20847)
The company Code X Sp. z o.o. received its suspension on 22 January 2010.
Družba Code X Sp. z o.o. je prejela svojo opustitev 22. januarja 2010.
In the meantime the company changed its legal seat from ul.
Medtem je družba spremenila svoj pravni sedež iz ul.
The company JET’LEAN received its suspension on 18 February 2010.
Družba JET’LEAN je prejela svojo opustitev 18. februarja 2010.
In the meantime the legal name of JET’LEAN was changed into JETLANE.
Medtem je bilo pravno ime družbe JET’LEAN spremenjeno v JETLANE.
The company Müller GmbH received its suspension on 30 March 2010.
Družba Müller GmbH je prejela svojo opustitev 30. marca 2010.
The additional TARIC code A977 initially given to the company Müller GmbH was erroneously attributed twice and was withdrawn.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC A977, prvotno dodeljena družbi Müller GmbH, je bila po pomoti dodeljena dvakrat in je bila razveljavljena.
on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013
o sklenitvi Sporazuma, v imenu Evropske unije, med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi s Skladom za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(2)(d) in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 77(2)(d) Pogodbe v povezavi s členom 218(6)(a)(v) Pogodbe,
According to Article 11 of Decision No 574/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ [1] the third countries associated with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis shall participate in the Fund in accordance with its provisions and arrangements should be concluded to specify supplementary rules necessary for such participation, including provisions ensuring the protection of the Community’s financial interests and the power of audit of the Court of Auditors.
Po členu 11 Odločbe št. 574/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Sklada za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 v okviru splošnega programa Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov [1] tretje države, ki se pridružijo izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, sodelujejo v Skladu skladno z določbami navedene odločbe, morali pa bi se tudi skleniti dogovori, ki podrobno opredelijo dopolnilna pravila, potrebna za takšno sodelovanje, vključno z določbami, ki zagotavljajo zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti in pooblastilo Računskemu sodišču, da izvaja revizije.
Following the authorisation given to the Commission on 20 December 2007, negotiations with the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein were concluded on 30 June 2009.
Potem ko je Komisija 20. decembra 2007 prejela pooblastilo, so se 30. junija 2009 zaključila pogajanja z Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn.
According to Council Decision 2010/374/EC of 30 November 2009 [2], and pending its conclusion at a later date, the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’) was signed on 19 March 2010 on behalf of the Union, and applied on a provisional basis.
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2010/374/ES z dne 30. novembra 2009 [2], in vse do njegove morebitne poznejše sklenitve, je bil Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi s Skladom za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) podpisan v imenu Unije dne 19. marca 2010 in se uporablja začasno.
As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, a Joint Declaration by the European Union and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 has been agreed by all Parties at the time of the signature, and attached to the Agreement, stating that the European Union has replaced and suceeded the European Community.
Zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2009, so se podpisnice ob podpisu Sporazuma dogovorile o Skupni izjavi Evropske unije in Republike Islandije, Kraljevine Norveške, Švicarske konfederacije in Kneževine Lihtenštajn o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi s Skladom za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013, ki je priložena Sporazumu, v kateri je zapisano, da Evropska unija nadomesti in nasledi Evropsko skupnost.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it, or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of 6 months after the Council has decided on this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.
Ker ta sklep nadgrajuje schengenski pravni red, se Danska v skladu s členom 4 navedenega protokola v šestih mesecih od dne, ko Svet sprejme ta sklep, odloči ali bo ta sklep prenesla v svoje nacionalno pravo.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [3].
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [3].
The United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoč in se v njem ne uporablja.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [4].
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [4].
Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on supplementary rules in relation to the External Borders Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’) [5] and the Declarations thereto are hereby approved on behalf of the Union.Article 2
Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Republiko Islandijo, Kraljevino Norveško, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o dopolnilnih pravilih v zvezi s Skladom za zunanje meje za obdobje 2007–2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) [5] ter izjave, ki so priložene Sporazumu, se odobrijo v imenu Unije.Člen 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to deposit on behalf of the Union the instrument of approval provided for in Article 13(2) of the Agreement in order to bind the Union.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e), da v imenu Evropske unije deponira listino o odobritvi, predvideno v členu 13(2) Sporazuma, ki je za Unijo zavezujoč.
OJ L 169, 3.7.2010, p. 22.
UL L 169, 3.7.2010, str. 22.
The Agreement has been published in OJ L 169, 3.7.2010, p. 24 together with the decision on signature.
Sporazum je bil objavljen v UL L 169, 3.7.2010, str. 24 skupaj s sklepom o podpisu.
establishing that Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors is not applicable to the bituminous coal mining in the Czech Republic
o neuporabi člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev pri kopanju bituminoznega premoga na Češkem
On 22 November 2010, the Commission received by e-mail a Czech request pursuant to Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC, asking for exemption of the bituminous coal mining in the Czech Republic from the application of the provisions of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Komisija je 22. novembra 2010 po elektronski pošti prejela zahtevek Češke republike v skladu s členom 30(4) Direktive 2004/17/ES, v katerem je ta prosila za izvzetje kopanja bituminoznega premoga na Češkem iz uporabe določb Direktive 2004/17/ES.
However, the opinion does not state that the other conditions relating to the direct exposure to competition were met in respect of bituminous coal mining in the Czech Republic.
Vendar v mnenju ni navedeno, da bi bili drugi pogoji v zvezi z neposredno izpostavljenostjo konkurenci izpolnjeni, kar zadeva kopanje bituminoznega premoga na Češkem.
The only entity engaged in bituminous coal mining in the Czech Republic is the company OKD a.s., which is a private company owned 100 % by a private Dutch Holding – New World Resources (NWR).
Edini subjekt, ki se ukvarja s kopanjem bituminoznega premoga na Češkem, je družba OKD a.s., tj. zasebna družba, ki je v celoti v lasti nizozemskega holdinga New World Resources (NWR).
Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which the Directive applies shall not be subject to the Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Člen 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES določa, da se Direktiva ne uporablja za naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti opravljanje ene od dejavnosti, na katere se Direktiva nanaša, če je dejavnost v državi članici, v kateri se opravlja, neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
Access is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied the relevant EU legislation opening a given sector or a part of it.
Dostop se šteje kot neomejen, če država članica izvaja in uporablja ustrezno zakonodajo EU za odpiranje določenega sektorja ali njegovega dela.
This legislation is listed in Annex XI to Directive 2004/17/EC.
Ta zakonodaja je navedena v Prilogi XI k Direktivi 2004/17/ES.
However for the exploration for and extraction of coal and other solid fuels, Annex XI does not list any relevant legislation liberalising this sector.
Vendar v zvezi z iskanjem in izkopavanjem premoga ter drugih trdnih goriv v Prilogi XI ni navedena nobena ustrezna zakonodaja, s katero bi se ta sektor liberaliziral.
Consequently free access to the market cannot be presumed, and it has to be demonstrated de facto and de jure.
Zato ni mogoče predpostavljati, da je vzpostavljen prost dostop do trga, pri čemer je treba dokazati, da je tak dostop dejansko in pravno prost.
An examination of the legal provisions applicable to issuing licenses for mining, in the Czech Republic, shows that it is currently granted on non-discriminatory basis, based on the assessment of the professional qualification of the applicant, and the technical and financial capacity to carry out the works.
Iz preučitve pravnih določb, ki veljajo za izdajanje rudniških koncesij na Češkem, je razvidno, da se te zdaj podeljujejo nediskriminatorno na podlagi ocene poklicne usposobljenosti prosilcev ter tehnične in finančne sposobnosti za izvedbo del.
For the purposes of this decision, the possibility to obtain mining licence could be considered, de jure, free.
Za namene tega sklepa je mogoče obravnavati, da je možnost za pridobitev rudniške koncesije pravno brezplačna.
Direct exposure to competition should be evaluated on the basis of various indicators, none of which are necessarily, per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci je treba oceniti na podlagi različnih kazalnikov, pri čemer noben od njih sam po sebi ni nujno odločilen.
In respect of the markets concerned by this decision, the aggregated market shares of the three main players on a given market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account [2].
V zvezi s trgi, na katere se nanaša ta sklep, je eno od meril, ki ga je treba upoštevati [2], skupni tržni delež treh glavnih akterjev na določenem trgu.
Given the characteristics of the markets concerned, further criteria should also be taken into account such as the degree of customer switching.
Glede na značilnosti zadevnih trgov bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi druga merila, kot je stopnja menjave dobavitelja.
The request submitted by the Czech Republic concerns bituminous coal mining in the Czech Republic.
Zahtevek Češke se nanaša na kopanje bituminoznega premoga na Češkem.
Product market
Proizvodni trg
The Czech request covers what is called ‘the primary market for bituminous coal’, which includes the production of bituminous coal and the wholesale distribution of coal [3].
Zahtevek Češke se nanaša na t. i. „primarni trg za bituminozni premog“ ter vključuje proizvodnjo bituminoznega premoga in grosistično distribucijo premoga [3].
When considering competition in the market for production of bituminous coal, regard must be had to the links between production and first sale/wholesale distribution of the bituminous coal extracted.
Pri obravnavi konkurence na trgu za proizvodnjo bituminoznega premoga je treba upoštevati povezave med proizvodnjo in prvo prodajo/grosistično distribucijo pridobljenega bituminoznega premoga.
This definition is also in line with previous Commission decisions [4] referring to the exploitation of other types of fuels.
Ta opredelitev je tudi v skladu s prejšnjimi odločbami Komisije [4], ki se nanašajo na izkoriščanje drugih vrst goriv.
The bituminous coal extracted has different chemical compositions and quality depending on geological conditions of individual mined seams.
Kemična sestava in kakovost pridobljenega bituminoznega premoga se razlikujeta glede na geološke pogoje v posameznih premogovnih slojih.
The bituminous coal can be divided into the coal suitable for coking (CSFC) and steam coal (SC).
Obstajata dve vrsti bituminoznega premoga, in sicer premog za koksanje in parni premog.
Although the two types of bituminous coal are mined in the same way, using the same technologies, they have however completely different end-use and different customer base.
Čeprav se ti vrsti bituminoznega premoga kopljeta na enak način in z uporabo enakih tehnologij, je njuna končna uporaba popolnoma drugačna, pri čemer je tudi mreža odjemalcev različna.
The prices are different and the products are not interchangeable.
Cene se razlikujejo in proizvodi niso zamenljivi.
CSFC is defined as bituminous coal with the quality enabling production of coke in blast furnaces and it is not used for direct heating or energy production.
Premog za koksanje je opredeljen kot bituminozni premog, ki se lahko zaradi svoje kakovosti uporabi za proizvodnjo koksa v plavžih in se ne uporablja za neposredno ogrevanje ali proizvodnjo energije.
CSFC is purchased solely by companies producing coke.
Premog za koksanje kupujejo izključno družbe, ki proizvajajo koks.
CSFC is the only raw material for coke production and has no other application actually.
Premog za koksanje je edina surovina za proizvodnjo koksa in se drugje dejansko ne uporablja.
The CSFC cannot be substituted by steam coal.
Premoga za koksanje ni mogoče zamenjati s parnim premogom.
SC is the coal which cannot be qualified as coking coal.
Parni premog se ne more šteti kot koksni premog.
The SC is used in power plants as fuel for production of electricity, heat and technological steam, as part of the production process of industrial plants such as sugar refineries, brick plants, cement factories and limekilns, paper mills, etc. SC may be substituted by CSFC, but doing so would not be economically viable.
Parni premog se uporablja v elektrarnah kot gorivo za proizvodnjo električne in toplotne energije ter tehnološke pare kot del proizvodnega procesa industrijskih obratov, kot so sladkorne rafinerije, opekarne, cementarne in obrati za žganje apna, papirnice itd. Parni premog se lahko nadomesti s premogom za koksanje, vendar to ne bi bilo ekonomsko upravičeno.
CSFC may be divided further into a few categories according to its quality.
Premog za koksanje se lahko nadalje razdeli v nekaj kategorij glede na njegovo kakovost.
CSFC referred to as hard coking coal is of the best quality, followed by CSFC referred to as semihard coking coal and semisoft coking coal.
Najkakovostnejši je premog za koksanje, ki se imenuje trdi koksni premog, sledita pa mu premoga za koksanje, ki se imenujeta poltrdi koksni premog in polmehki koksni premog.
However, the market for the individual types of CSFC is not separated and no such distinction will be made for the purposes of the assessment for the present decision.
Vendar trg za posamezne vrste premoga za koksanje ni ločen, zato se takšno razlikovanje ne bo upoštevalo za namene ocene iz tega sklepa.
In view of the above, and in line with the application, for the purposes of evaluating the conditions laid down in Article 30(1) of Directive 2004/17/EC, CSFC and SC are considered to constitute separate product markets and they should therefore be examined separately.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega in v skladu z vlogo se za namene ocenjevanja pogojev iz člena 30(1) Direktive 2004/17/ES premog za koksanje in parni premog obravnavata kot ločena proizvodna trga, zato se morata preveriti ločeno.
Geographical market
Geografski trg
The Czech request considers that the relevant geographical market would be a market larger than the national territory, incorporating the territories of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Austria, Poland and Hungary for CSFC.
V zahtevku Češke je navedeno, da bi zadevni geografski trg predstavljal trg, večji od nacionalnega ozemlja, ki bi za premog za koksanje vključeval ozemlja Češke, Slovaške, Avstrije, Poljske in Madžarske.