natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The laboratory referred to in Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease repealing Directive 85/511/EEC and Decisions 89/531/EEC and 91/665/EEC and amending Directive 92/46/EEC [12].13.
Zadevni laboratorij iz Direktive Sveta 2003/85/ES z dne 29. septembra 2003 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke, ki razveljavljajo Direktivo 85/511/EGS in odločbi 89/531/EGS in 91/665/EGS ter spreminja Direktivo 92/46/EGS [12].13.
EU reference laboratory for brucellosis
Referenčni laboratorij EU za brucelozo
EU reference laboratory for equine diseases other than African horse sickness
Referenčni laboratorij EU za bolezni enoprstih kopitarjev razen konjske kuge
EU reference laboratory for crustacean diseases
Referenčni laboratorij EU za bolezni rakov
EU reference laboratory for rabies
Referenčni laboratorij EU za steklino
EU reference laboratory for bovine tuberculosis
Referenčni laboratorij EU za govejo tuberkulozo
Roma
Rim
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM)
Rijksinstitut voor Volksgezondheit en Milieu (RIVM)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 209/2011
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 209/2011
terminating the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of wireless wide area networking (WWAN) modems originating in the People’s Republic of China and terminating the registration of such imports imposed by Regulations (EU) No 570/2010 and (EU) No 811/2010
o zaključku protidampinškega in protisubvencijskega postopka glede uvoza modemov za brezžično prostrano omrežje (WWAN) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in o zaključku registracije takega uvoza, uvedene z uredbama (EU) št. 570/2010 in (EU) št. 811/2010
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘basic Regulation’) [1], and in particular Articles 9 and 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), in zlasti členov 9 in 14 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 of on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2], and in particular Article 14 and 24 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2], in zlasti členov 14 in 24 Uredbe,
The anti-dumping proceeding and registration of imports
Protidampinški postopek in registracija uvoza
On 3 June 2010, the Commission received a complaint concerning alleged injurious dumping into the Union by imports of wireless wide area networking (WWAN) modems originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’).
Komisija je 3. junija 2010 prejela pritožbo o domnevnem škodljivem dampinškem uvozu v Unijo modemov za brezžično prostrano omrežje (WWAN) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
The said complaint also contained a request for the registration of imports pursuant to Article 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.
Navedena pritožba je vsebovala tudi zahtevo za registracijo uvoza v skladu s členom 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009.
The complaint was lodged by Option NV (‘the complainant’), the sole known producer of WWAN modems in the Union, representing 100 % of the total Union production.
Pritožbo je vložila družba Option NV („pritožnik“), ki je edini znani proizvajalec modemov WWAN v Uniji in predstavlja 100 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping and of material injury resulting therefrom which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu in o posledični znatni škodi, kar je upravičilo začetek protidampinškega postopka.
The Commission, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], accordingly initiated an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of WWAN modems originating in the PRC and currently falling within CN codes ex84718000 and ex85176200.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], začela protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom v Unijo modemov WWAN s poreklom iz LRK, trenutno uvrščenih v oznaki KN ex84718000 in ex85176200.
On 1 July 2010, the Commission made imports of the same product originating in the PRC subject to registration under Commission Regulation (EU) No 570/2010 [4].
Komisija je 1. julija 2010 z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 570/2010 [4] uvedla registracijo uvoza istega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, exporting producers in the PRC, importers and users known to be concerned, associations of importers or users known to be concerned, raw material suppliers and service providers, and the representatives of the PRC of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila pritožnika, proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, uvoznike in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, združenja uvoznikov ali uporabnikov, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, dobavitelje surovin in ponudnike storitev ter predstavnike LRK.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 16 of the basic Regulation the Commission performed some of the verification visits normally required.
V skladu z določbami iz člena 16 osnovne uredbe je Komisija opravila nekatere običajno zahtevane preveritvene obiske.
As far as dumping is concerned and in particular for the purposes of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation the Commission focused on issues mentioned in Article 2(7)(c) and in particular on distortions related to decision making, corporate governance, loans, financing of companies and export credits.
V zvezi z dampingom in zlasti za namene člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe se je Komisija osredotočila na vprašanja iz člena 2(7)(c) in zlasti na izkrivljanje, povezano z odločanjem, upravljanjem podjetij, posojili, financiranjem podjetij in izvoznimi krediti.
Although some initial indications hinting at distortions were revealed, the termination of this anti-dumping proceeding meant that this issue was not pursued.
Čeprav so nekateri znaki nakazovali na izkrivljanje, je zaključek tega protidampinškega postopka pomenil, da se vprašanje ni več obravnavalo.
The anti-subsidy proceeding and registration of imports
Protisubvencijski postopek in registracija uvoza
On 2 August 2010, the Commission received a complaint concerning the alleged injurious subsidisation into the Union of imports of WWAN modems originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 2. avgusta 2010 prejela pritožbo o domnevnem škodljivem subvencioniranem uvozu v Unijo modemov WWAN s poreklom iz LRK.
The said complaint also contained a request for the registration of imports pursuant to Article 24(5) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009.
Navedena pritožba je vsebovala tudi zahtevo za registracijo uvoza v skladu s členom 24(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 597/2009.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of the existence of subsidisation and of material injury resulting therefrom which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o subvencioniranju in posledični znatni škodi, kar je upravičilo začetek protisubvencijskega postopka.
The Commission, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5], accordingly initiated an anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of WWAN modems originating in the PRC and currently falling within CN codes ex84718000 and ex85176200.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5], začela protisubvencijski postopek v zvezi z uvozom v Unijo modemov WWAN s poreklom iz LRK, trenutno uvrščenih v oznaki KN ex84718000 in ex85176200.
On 17 September 2010, the Commission made imports of the same product originating in the PRC subject to registration under Commission Regulation (EU) No 811/2010 [6].
Komisija je 17. septembra 2010 z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 811/2010 [6] uvedla registracijo uvoza istega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK.
WITHDRAWAL OF THE COMPLAINTS AND TERMINATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS
UMIK PRITOŽB IN ZAKLJUČEK POSTOPKOV
By two letters of 26 October 2010 to the Commission, Option NV withdrew its anti-dumping and anti-subsidy complaints concerning imports of WWAN modems originating in the PRC.
Družba Option NV je v dveh pismih Komisiji z dne 26. oktobra 2010 umaknila protidampinško in protisubvencijsko pritožbo glede uvoza modemov WWAN s poreklom iz LRK.
The reason for the withdrawal of the complaints was that Option NV had entered into a cooperation agreement with an exporting producer in the PRC.
Razlog za umik pritožb je bil, da je družba Option NV s proizvajalcem izvoznikom v LRK sklenila sporazum o sodelovanju.
In accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009, when the complainant withdraws its complaint the proceeding may be terminated unless such termination would not be in the Union interest.
V skladu s členom 9(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 in členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 597/2009 se postopek lahko zaključi, ko pritožnik umakne pritožbo, razen če tak zaključek ne bi bil v interesu Unije.
The Commission considered that the present proceedings should be terminated since the respective anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations had not brought to light any considerations showing that such termination would not be in the Union interest.
Komisija je menila, da je treba sedanja postopka zaključiti, saj v ustrezni protidampinški in protisubvencijski preiskavi ni bilo ugotovljeno, da to ne bi bilo v interesu Unije.
Interested parties were informed accordingly and were given an opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane strani so bile o tem obveščene in so imele možnost predložiti pripombe.
Subsequent to the withdrawal of the complaints, one company contacted the Commission claiming that it was a Union producer of WWAN modems.
Po umiku pritožb se je na Komisijo obrnila družba, ki je trdila, da je proizvajalec Unije modemov WWAN.
The company subsequently argued that the proceedings should be continued in spite of the withdrawal of the complaints.
Družba je trdila, da bi morali postopke nadaljevati kljub umiku pritožb.
It should be noted that the company came forward for the first time after the procedural deadlines in both proceedings provided to interested parties to come forward and make their views known as a Union producer and, as a consequence, failed to support the complaints lodged by Option before the latter were withdrawn.
Upoštevati je treba, da se je družba prvič javila po izteku postopkovnih rokov, ki so bili za oba postopka predvideni za zainteresirane strani, da se javijo in izrazijo svoja stališča kot proizvajalec Unije, in posledično ni podprla pritožb, ki jih je vložila družba Option NV pred njihovim umikom.
It should also be noted that the allegations and information put forward by this company were not such as to lead the Commission to conclude that it would be in the Union interest to pursue the present proceedings initiated further to Option’s complaints following the withdrawal of the latter.
Upoštevati je treba tudi, da na podlagi trditev in informacij, ki jih je predložila ta družba, Komisija ni mogla sklepati, da bi bilo nadaljevanje sedanjih postopkov, uvedenih v zvezi s pritožbo družbe Option NV, po umiku pritožbe v interesu Unije.
In this context, due account needed to be taken — in respect of the company’s claimed operations in relation to WWAN modems in the Union — concerning the company’s ability in practice to (i) play a role in the Union market for WWAN modems and moreover; (ii) provide for a possible shortage in supply, were measures to be imposed.
Ob tem je bilo v zvezi z domnevnimi dejavnostmi družbe glede modemov WWAN v Uniji treba ustrezno upoštevati dejansko zmožnost družbe, da (i) ima vlogo na trgu Unije za modeme WWAN in (ii) da bi v primeru uvedbe ukrepov nadomestila morebitno pomanjkanje dobave.
Based on the information provided in this regard within the context of the present proceedings, it was concluded that it would be disproportionate to continue with the investigation and impose measures following the withdrawal of the complaints.
Na podlagi predloženih informacij v zvezi s tem in v okviru sedanjih postopkov je bilo sklenjeno, da bi bila nadaljevanje preiskave in uvedba ukrepov po umiku pritožbe nesorazmerna.
No other comments were received indicating that termination of the present proceedings would not be in the Union interest.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb, ki bi kazale, da zaključek sedanjih postopkov ne bi bil v interesu Unije.
In the circumstances, the Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping and the anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports into the Union of WWAN modems originating in the PRC should be terminated without the imposition of measures.
V danih okoliščinah Komisija sklepa, da je protidampinški in protisubvencijski postopek glede uvoza v Unijo modemov WWAN s poreklom iz LRK treba zaključiti brez uvedbe ukrepov.
The registration of imports of WWAN modems originating in the PRC and declared under CN codes ex84718000 and ex85176200 in application of Regulations (EU) No 570/2010 and (EU) No 811/2010 should therefore be discontinued and the said Regulations repealed,
Z registracijo uvoza modemov WWAN s poreklom iz LRK in prijavljenih pod oznakama KN ex84718000 in ex85176200 ob uporabi uredb (EU) št. 570/2010 in (EU) št. 811/2010 je treba zato prenehati, navedeni uredbi pa razveljaviti –
The anti-dumping and the anti-subsidy proceeding concerning imports into the Union of wireless wide area networking (WWAN) modems originating in the People’s Republic of China and currently falling under CN codes ex84718000 and ex85176200 are hereby terminated.
Protidampinški in protisubvencijski postopek glede uvoza modemov za brezžično prostrano omrežje (WWAN) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščenih v oznaki KN ex84718000 in ex85176200, se zaključita.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports established in application of Article 1 of Regulations (EU) No 570/2010 and (EU) No 811/2010.
Carinskim organom se odredi, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza, uvedeno s členom 1 uredb (EU) št. 570/2010 in (EU) št. 811/2010.
Regulations (EU) No 570/2010 and (EU) No 811/2010 are hereby repealed.
Uredbi (EU) št. 570/2010 in (EU) št. 811/2010 se zato razveljavita.
OJ C 171, 30.6.2010, p. 9.
UL C 171, 30.6.2010, str. 9.
OJ L 163, 30.6.2010, p. 34.
UL L 163, 30.6.2010, str. 34.
OJ C 249, 16.9.2010, p. 7.
UL C 249, 16.9.2010, str. 7.
OJ L 243, 16.9.2010, p. 37.
UL L 243, 16.9.2010, str. 37.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 210/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 210/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 March 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 3. marca 2011.
Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 211/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the citizens’ initiative
o državljanski pobudi
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 24 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega odstavka člena 24 Pogodbe,
The Treaty on European Union (TEU) reinforces citizenship of the Union and enhances further the democratic functioning of the Union by providing, inter alia, that every citizen is to have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union by way of a European citizens’ initiative.
Pogodba o Evropski uniji (PEU) krepi državljanstvo Unije in nadalje krepi demokratično delovanje Unije, med drugim z zagotavljanjem, da mora vsak državljan imeti pravico sodelovati v demokratičnem življenju Unije prek evropske državljanske pobude.
That procedure affords citizens the possibility of directly approaching the Commission with a request inviting it to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties similar to the right conferred on the European Parliament under Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and on the Council under Article 241 TFEU.
Ta postopek daje državljanom možnost, da se neposredno obrnejo na Komisijo s pozivom, naj predloži zakonodajni predlog za pravni akt Unije za namen izvajanja Pogodb, ki je podobna pravici, podeljeni Evropskemu parlamentu v skladu s členom 225 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), Svetu pa v skladu s členom 241 PDEU.
The procedures and conditions required for the citizens’ initiative should be clear, simple, user-friendly and proportionate to the nature of the citizens’ initiative so as to encourage participation by citizens and to make the Union more accessible.
Postopki in pogoji, potrebni za državljansko pobudo, bi morali biti jasni, preprosti, uporabniku prijazni in sorazmerni z naravo državljanske pobude, da bi spodbujali sodelovanje državljanov in naredili Unijo dostopnejšo.
They should strike a judicious balance between rights and obligations.
Morali bi temeljiti na razumnem ravnovesju med pravicami in obveznostmi.
They should also ensure that citizens of the Union are subject to similar conditions for supporting a citizens’ initiative regardless of the Member State from which they come.
Zagotoviti bi morali tudi, da za državljane Unije veljajo podobni pogoji glede sodelovanja pri državljanski pobudi, in sicer neodvisno od države članice, iz katere prihajajo.
The Commission should, upon request, provide citizens with information and informal advice about citizens’ initiatives, notably as regards the registration criteria.
Komisija bi morala državljanom na njihovo prošnjo zagotoviti podatke in neuradne nasvete o državljanskih pobudah, zlasti o merilih za prijavo.
It is necessary to establish the minimum number of Member States from which citizens must come.
Določiti je treba najmanjše število držav članic, iz katerih morajo prihajati državljani.
In order to ensure that a citizens’ initiative is representative of a Union interest, while ensuring that the instrument remains easy to use, that number should be set at one quarter of Member States.
V zagotovitev, da državljanska pobuda predstavlja interese Unije, in ob hkratnem zagotavljanju, da je instrument lahek za uporabo, bi moralo biti najmanjše število ena četrtina držav članic.
For that purpose, it is also appropriate to establish the minimum number of signatories coming from each of those Member States.
V ta namen je tudi primerno določiti najmanjše število podpisnikov, ki prihajajo iz vsake od teh držav članic.
In order to ensure similar conditions for citizens to support a citizens’ initiative, those minimum numbers should be degressively proportional.
Da bi državljanom zagotovili podobne pogoje za sodelovanje pri državljanski pobudi, bi moralo biti to število sorazmerno upadajoče.
For the purpose of clarity, those minimum numbers should be set out for each Member State in an annex to this Regulation.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba najmanjše število podpisnikov za posamezno državo članico določiti v prilogi k tej uredbi.
The minimum number of signatories required in each Member State should correspond to the number of Members of the European Parliament elected in each Member State, multiplied by 750.
Najmanjše število podpisnikov bi moralo biti za vsako državo članico enako številu poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, izvoljenih v tisti državi članici, pomnoženemu s količnikom 750.
The Commission should be empowered to amend that annex in order to reflect any modification in the composition of the European Parliament.
Komisijo bi bilo treba pooblastiti, da spremeni navedeno prilogo, da bi se upoštevale vsakršne spremembe v sestavi Evropskega parlamenta.
It is appropriate to fix a minimum age for supporting a citizens’ initiative.
Primerno je določiti najnižjo starost za podporo državljanske pobude.
That should be set as the age at which citizens are entitled to vote in elections to the European Parliament.
To bi bilo treba določiti kot starost, pri kateri lahko državljani volijo na volitvah v Evropski parlament.
A minimum organised structure is needed in order to successfully carry through a citizens’ initiative.
Za uspešno izvedbo državljanske pobude je potrebna minimalna organizirana struktura.
That should take the form of a citizens’ committee, composed of natural persons (organisers) coming from at least seven different Member States, in order to encourage the emergence of European-wide issues and to foster reflection on those issues.
Ta bi morala imeti obliko odbora državljanov, sestavljenega iz fizičnih oseb (organizatorjev) iz najmanj sedmih različnih držav članic, da bi tako spodbudili oblikovanje vseevropskih vprašanj in razmislek o teh vprašanjih.
For the sake of transparency and smooth and efficient communication, the citizens’ committee should designate representatives to liaise between the citizens’ committee and the institutions of the Union throughout the procedure.
Za zagotovitev preglednosti ter nemotene in učinkovite komunikacije bi moral organizacijski odbor imenovati svoje predstavnike, ki bi ves čas postopka povezovali odbor državljanov in institucije Unije.
Entities, notably organisations which under the Treaties contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union, should be able to promote a citizens’ initiative, provided that they do so with full transparency.
Subjekti, zlasti organizacije, ki v skladu s Pogodbama prispevajo k oblikovanju evropske politične zavesti in izražanju volje državljanov Unije, bi morali imeti možnost, da podprejo državljansko pobudo, če to storijo popolnoma pregledno.
In order to ensure coherence and transparency in relation to proposed citizens’ initiatives and to avoid a situation where signatures are being collected for a proposed citizens’ initiative which does not comply with the conditions laid down in this Regulation, it should be mandatory to register such initiatives on a website made available by the Commission prior to collecting the necessary statements of support from citizens.
Da bi zagotovili usklajenost in preglednost v zvezi s predlaganimi državljanskimi pobudami ter se izognili primerom zbiranja podpisov za predlagano državljansko pobudo, ki ne ustreza pogojem iz te uredbe, bi bilo treba te pobude obvezno prijaviti na spletnem mestu, ki ga da na voljo Komisija pred začetkom zbiranja potrebnih izjav državljanov o podpori.
All proposed citizens’ initiatives that comply with the conditions laid down in this Regulation should be registered by the Commission.
Vse predlagane državljanske pobude, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, določene s to uredbo, bi morala Komisija prijaviti.
The Commission should deal with registration in accordance with the general principles of good administration.
Komisija bi morala prijavo obravnavati v skladu s splošnimi načeli dobrega upravljanja.
Once a proposed citizens’ initiative is registered, statements of support from citizens may be collected by the organisers.
Ko je predlagana državljanska pobuda prijavljena, lahko organizatorji začnejo zbirati izjave državljanov o podpori.
It is appropriate to set out the form for the statement of support in an annex to this Regulation, specifying the data required for the purposes of verification by the Member States.
Primerno je, da se obrazec za izjavo o podpori določi v prilogi k tej uredbi, v njem pa se opredelijo podatki, ki so potrebni za preverjanje s strani držav članic.