natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘Kabanosy’ were extremely popular during Communist times (1945-89); everybody used to buy them.
Proizvodi „Kabanosy“ so bili izjemno priljubljeni v času komunizma (1945–1989), ko so jih kupovali vsi.
They graced elegant tables on special occasions and were equally suitable as picnic food for travellers, as gifts or as a snack with vodka.
Ob posebnih priložnostih so krasili lično pripravljene mize in bili primerni tudi kot hrana za popotnike, darila ali prigrizek z vodko.
Together with ham and bacon, they also became a Polish export speciality.
Skupaj s šunko in slanino so postali izvozna posebnost Poljske.
Traditional ingredient – pork
Tradicionalna sestavina – svinjina
‘Kabanosy’ are made from specially fattened hogs which used to be known as ‘kabany’.
Proizvod „Kabanosy“ je narejen iz svinjine prašičev, pitanih na poseben način, ki so znani pod imenom „kabany“.
The term ‘kaban’ features in the 1834 epic poem ‘Pan Tadeusz’ by Poland’s national bard Adam Mickiewicz.
Izraz „kaban“ je naveden v epski pesnitvi Pan Tadeusz poljskega nacionalnega pesnika Adama Mickiewicza iz leta 1834.
The term ‘kabanina’, derived from ‘kaban’, was also widely used.
Splošno se je uporabljal tudi izraz „kabanina“, ki izhaja iz izraza „kaban“.
According to the definition in the Polish dictionary published in Vilnius in 1861, it usually referred to pork.
Glede na opredelitev iz poljskega slovarja, objavljenega leta 1861 v Vilni, se je izraz običajno nanašal na svinjino.
The meat of pigs kept for the production of ‘kabanosy’ must have an intramuscular fat content of more than 3 %; this is the marbling that confers on the product the desired tenderness, succulence and excellent taste.
Meso prašičev, rejenih za proizvodnjo proizvoda „Kabanosy“, mora vsebovati več kot 3 % medmišične maščobe; taka struktura mesa daje proizvodu želeno mehkost, sočnost in odličen okus.
The use of such meat has a decisive influence on the quality of the final product and its specific character, and is in keeping with the traditional method of production.
Uporaba takega mesa odločilno vpliva na kakovost končnega proizvoda in njegove posebne lastnosti ter je v skladu s tradicionalno metodo pridobivanja.
With regard to the specific character of ‘kabanosy’, the following in particular should be subjected to checks:
Ob upoštevanju posebnih lastnosti proizvoda „Kabanosy“ je treba nadzorovati zlasti:
Quality of raw materials used in production (pork, seasonings), including:
Kakovost surovin, uporabljenih pri proizvodnji (svinjina, začimbe), vključno s:
technological suitability of the meat;
tehnološko ustreznostjo mesa,
type of fattening;
načinom pitanja,
curing time;
časom soljenja,
seasonings used in the production of ‘kabanosy’ and the proportions in which they are used.
začimbami, uporabljenimi pri proizvodnji proizvoda „Kabanosy“, in razmerji, v katerih so začimbe uporabljene.
‘Kabanosy’ smoking process
Postopek prekajevanja proizvoda „Kabanosy“
In the course of an inspection, the following must be checked:
Med inšpekcijskim pregledom je treba preveriti:
maintenance of the temperature required for traditional smoking in hot smoke and the heating temperature;
ohranjanje temperature, ki je potrebna za tradicionalno prekajevanje na vročem dimu, in temperature segrevanja,
maintenance of the duration and temperature of repeat smoking in cold smoke;
ohranjanje trajanja in temperature ponavljajočega se prekajevanja na hladnem dimu,
use of beech chips for smoking in cold smoke.
uporabo bukovih trsk za hladno prekajevanje.
Quality of the finished product:
Kakovost končnega proizvoda:
protein content;
vsebnost beljakovin,
water content;
vsebnost vode,
fat content;
vsebnost maščob,
sodium chloride content;
vsebnost natrijevega klorida,
nitrate (III) and nitrate (V) content;
vsebnost nitrata (III) in nitrata (V),
taste and aroma.
okus in aroma.
Shape of the product.
Oblika proizvoda
Frequency of checks
Pogostnost kontrol
Checks on the abovementioned stages must be carried out once every 2 months.
Preglede v navedenih fazah je treba izvesti enkrat na dva meseca.
If all these stages are proceeding correctly, the frequency of the checks may be reduced to two per year.
Če vse te faze potekajo pravilno, se lahko pogostost pregledov zmanjša na dva pregleda na leto.
If irregularities occur at any stage, the frequency of checks on that stage must be increased (to once every 2 months).
Če se v kateri koli fazi pojavijo nepravilnosti, je treba preglede v zadevni fazi izvajati bolj pogosto (enkrat na dva meseca).
Checks on other stages may be carried out once every 6 months.
Pregledi v drugih fazah se lahko izvajajo enkrat na šest mesecev.
Name: Główny Inspektorat Jakości Handlowej Artykułów Rolno-Spożywczych
Naziv: Główny Inspektorat Jakości Handlowej Artykułów Rolno-Spożywczych
Wspólna 30, 00-930 Warsaw, POLAND
Wspólna 30, 00-930 Warsaw, Poljska
Tel. +48 226232901
Telefon: +48 226232901
Fax +48 226232099
Telefaks: +48 226232099
Public
javno
 Private
 zasebno
The above inspection authority is responsible for checks on the entire specification.
Zgoraj navedeni nadzorni organ je odgovoren za preglede celotne specifikacije.
In 19th century Poland and Lithuania the term ‘kaban’, or the diminutive form ‘kabanek’, referred to extensively reared young hogs which used to be fattened mainly with potatoes, and the meat they produced was customarily called ‘kabanina’.19 consumers that it has been produced following the Polish tradition.
V Poljski in Litvi 19. stoletja sta se izraza „kaban“ in njegova pomanjševalnica „kabanek“ nanašala na ekstenzivno rejene mlade prašiče, ki so jih pitali večinoma s krompirjem. Proizvedeno meso so tradicionalno poimenovali „kabanina“.
Originally used to refer to wild boars, hogs and even horses, by the 19th century, according to the 1863 Encyklopedyja Powszechna, Volume 13, the term was universally used to designate a well fed, fat young hog.19‘Kabanosy’ based on traditional production methods (Internal Regulations No 21).
Izraz, ki se je do 19. stoletja prvotno nanašal na divje merjasce, prašiče in celo konje, se je glede na zvezek 13 knjige Encyklopedyja Powszechna iz leta 1863 na splošno uporabljal za poimenovanje dobro pitanega debelega mladega prašiča.
E-mail: —
E-naslov: —
The hogs were specially fattened up to obtain delicate, exquisite meat with a high intramuscular fat content which gave the products made from it a strong, specific taste, tenderness and succulence.
Prašiči so bili pitani na poseben način, tako da je bilo meso okusno, odlično in je imelo visoko vsebnost medmišične maščobe, zato so imeli proizvodi močan, značilen okus in so bili mehki in sočni.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1045/2011
concerning the non-approval of the active substance asulam, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending Commission Decision 2008/934/EC
o neodobritvi aktivne snovi asulam v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in o spremembi Direktive Komisije 2008/934/ES
In accordance with Article 80(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC [2] is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which completeness has been established in accordance with Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [3].
V skladu s členom 80(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 in ob upoštevanju postopka in pogojev za odobritev se mora uporabljati Direktiva Sveta 91/414/EGS [2] za aktivne snovi, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da je dokumentacija popolna v skladu s členom 16 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [3].
Asulam is an active substance for which completeness has been established in accordance with that Regulation.
Asulam je aktivna snov, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je dokumentacija popolna v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
These lists included asulam.
Navedeni seznam je vključeval asulam.
Consequently, Commission Decision 2008/934/EC of 5 December 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of certain active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances [7] was adopted on the non-inclusion of asulam.
Zato je bila za nevključitev asulama sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2008/934/ES z dne 5. decembra 2008 o nevključitvi nekaterih aktivnih snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedene snovi [7].
It communicated that report to the European Food Safety Authority (hereinafter ‘the Authority’) and to the Commission on 6 November 2009.
Navedeno poročilo je 6. novembra 2009 predložilo Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in Komisiji.
In accordance with Article 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and at the request of the Commission, the Authority presented its conclusion on the risk assessment of asulam to the Commission on 23 September 2010 [8].
V skladu s členom 20(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in na zahtevo Komisije je Agencija 23. septembra 2010 Komisiji predložila svoj sklep o oceni tveganja asulama [8].
The draft assessment report, the additional report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 14 July 2011 in the format of the Commission review report for asulam.
Države članice in Komisija so osnutek poročila o oceni, dodatno poročilo in sklep Agencije pregledale v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 14. julija 2011 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu asulama.
During the evaluation of this active substance, concerns were identified.
Med ocenjevanjem te aktivne snovi so se pojavili številni pomisleki, namreč zaradi manjkajočih podatkov o prisotnosti in toksičnosti metabolita sulfanilamid kot tudi o prisotnosti drugih potencialno pomembnih metabolitov, ki niso bili analizirani v dostopnih poskusih za določitev ostankov in študijah o predelavi, ni bilo mogoče izvesti ustrezne ocene izpostavljenosti potrošnikov.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 21(1) of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, the Commission invited the applicant to submit comments on the draft review report.
Poleg tega ga je v skladu s členom 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k osnutku poročila o pregledu.
Consequently, it has not been demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing asulam satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato ni bilo dokazano, da bi bilo pod predlaganimi pogoji uporabe pričakovati, da fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo asulam, izpolnjujejo splošne zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Asulam should therefore not be approved pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Asulam se zato ne sme odobriti kot aktivna snov na podlagi člena 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
For plant protection products containing asulam, where Member States grant any period of grace in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, this period should expire on 31 December 2012 at the latest as laid down in the second paragraph of Article 3 of Decision 2008/934/EC.
Za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo asulam in pri katerih države članice odobrijo prehodno obdobje v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, to obdobje poteče najpozneje 31. decembra 2012, kot je določeno v drugem odstavku člena 3 Odločbe 2008/934/ES.
This Regulation does not prejudice the submission of a further application for asulam pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev ponovnega zahtevka za asulam v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
In the interest of clarity, the entry for asulam in the Annex to Decision 2008/934/EC should be deleted.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba v Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/934/ES črtati vrstico o asulamu.
The Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health did not deliver an opinion.
Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ni podal mnenja.
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
Izvedbeni akt je bil potreben, zato je predsednik odboru za pritožbe predložil osnutek izvedbenega akta v ponovno obravnavo.
The appeal committee did not deliver an opinion,
Odbor za pritožbe ni podal mnenja –
The active substance asulam is not approved.
Aktivna snov asulam se ne odobri.
Member States shall ensure that authorisations for plant protection products containing asulam are withdrawn by 31 December 2011.
Država članice zagotovijo, da se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo asulam, prekličejo do 31. decembra 2011.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 31 December 2012 at the latest.
Morebitno prehodno obdobje, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu s členom 46 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, je čim krajše in traja največ do 31. decembra 2012.
In the Annex to Decision 2008/934/EC, the entry for ‘asulam’ is deleted.
V Prilogi k Odločbi 2008/934/ES se črta vrstica o asulamu.
European Food Safety Authority; Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance asulam.
[8] Evropska agencija za varnost hrane; Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja pesticidov z aktivno snovjo asulam.
[71 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1822.
[71 str.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1822.
Those concerns were, in particular, the following. It was not possible to perform a reliable consumer exposure assessment as data were missing concerning the presence and toxicity of the metabolite sulfanilamide, as well as concerning the presence of other potentially significant metabolites that were not analysed in the available residue trials and processing studies.
Poleg tega ni bilo na voljo podatkov o toksikološkem pomenu nečistoč v tehničnem materialu aktivne snovi.
Furthermore, no data was available on the toxicological relevance of the impurities in the technical specification of the active substance. In addition, a high risk to birds was identified.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi visoko tveganje za ptice.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1046/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1046/2011
This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 October 2011.
Ta uredba začne veljati 20. oktobra 2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1047/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1047/2011
on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 December 2011 to 29 February 2012
o izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj za česen v podobdobju od 1. decembra 2011 do 29. februarja 2012
The quantities for which ‘A’ licence applications have been lodged by traditional importers and by new importers during the first seven working days of October 2011, pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 exceed the quantities available for products originating in China, and all third countries other than China and Argentina.
Količine, za katere so tradicionalni uvozniki in novi uvozniki vložili zahtevke za izdajo dovoljenj „A“ v prvih sedmih dneh meseca oktobra 2011 v skladu s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 341/2007, presegajo količine, ki so na voljo za proizvode s poreklom iz Kitajske in vseh tretjih držav razen Kitajske in Argentine.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006, it is now necessary to establish the extent to which the ‘A’ licence applications sent to the Commission by 14 October 2011 can be met in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007.
Zato je v skladu s členom 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1301/2006 treba določiti, v kolikšni meri je možno ob uporabi člena 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 341/2007 ugoditi zahtevkom za izdajo dovoljenj „A“, poslanim Komisiji najpozneje do štirinajstega v mesecu oktobru 2011.
Applications for ‘A’ import licences lodged pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 during the first seven working days of October 2011 and sent to the Commission by 14 October 2011 shall be met at a percentage rate of the quantities applied for as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Zahtevkom za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj „A“, ki so bili vloženi v skladu s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 341/2007 v prvih sedmih dneh meseca oktobra 2011 in poslani Komisiji do štirinajstega v mesecu oktobru 2011, se ugodi po odstotni stopnji zaprošenih količin, določenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1048/2011
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1048/2011
repealing Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1763/2004 o uvedbi določenih omejevalnih ukrepov v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSJ)
Having regard to Council Decision 2010/603/CFSP of 7 October 2010 on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [1],
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2010/603/SZVP z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o nadaljnjih ukrepih v podporo učinkovitemu izvajanju mandata Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (MKSJ) [1],
Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 [2] gives effect to Decision 2010/603/CFSP by freezing the assets of certain individuals, in support of the ICTY mandate.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1763/2004 [2] se izvaja Sklep 2010/603/SZVP in sicer z zamrznitvijo sredstev določenih posameznikov v podporo MSKJ.
Decision 2010/603/CFSP expired on 10 October 2011.
Sklep 2010/603/SZVP je prenehal veljati 10. oktobra 2011.
It is therefore appropriate to repeal Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 with immediate effect,
Zato je primerno Uredbo (ES) št. 1763/2004 razveljaviti s takojšnjim učinkom –
Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 is hereby repealed.
Uredba (ES) št. 1763/2004 se razveljavi.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1049/2011
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1049/2011
implementing Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan
o izvajanju člena 11(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 753/2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim posameznikom, skupinam, podjetjem in subjektom zaradi razmer v Afganistanu
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 of 1 August 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan [1], and in particular Article 11 (1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 753/2011 z dne 1. avgusta 2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim posameznikom, skupinam, podjetjem in subjektom zaradi razmer v Afganistanu [1] in zlasti člena 11(1) Uredbe,
On 1 August 2011, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 753/2011.
Svet je 1. avgusta 2011 sprejel Uredbo (EU) št. 753/2011.
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 should be amended accordingly,
Prilogo I k Uredbi (EU) št. 753/2011 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
The persons listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be added to the list set out in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 753/2011.
Osebe s seznama iz Priloge k tej uredbi se dodajo na seznam iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 753/2011.
Address: Boghra Road, Miralzei Village, Chaman, Baluchistan Province, Pakistan
Naslov: Boghra Road, Miralzei Village, Chaman, Baluchistan Province, Pakistan
Date of Birth (a) 1957, (b) 1960. Nationality: Afghan.
Letnica rojstva: (a) 1957; (b) 1960).
Date of UN designation: 04.10.2011
Datum uvrstitve na seznam ZN: 4.10.2011.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2011/698/CFSP of 20 October 2011 implementing Decision 2011/486/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan
Popravek Izvedbenega Sklepa Sveta 2011/698/SZVP z dne 20. oktobra 2011 o izvajanju Sklepa 2011/486/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim posameznikom, skupinam, podjetjem in subjektom zaradi razmer v Afganistanu
(Official Journal of the European Union L 276 of 21 October 2011)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 276 z dne 21. oktobra 2011)
On page 48, Annex, point (1):
Stran 48, Priloga, točka 1:
‘Date of birth: (a) 1962, (b) 1961, (c) between 1968 and 1970.’,
„Letnica rojstva: (a) 1962, (b) 1961, (c) med letoma 1968 in 1970.“
‘Date of birth: (a) 1966, (b) 1961, (c) between 1968 and 1970.’.
„Letnica rojstva: (a) 1966, (b) 1961, (c) med letoma 1968 in 1970.“.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1049/2011 of 20 October 2011 implementing Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU) No 753/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain individuals, groups, undertakings and entities in view of the situation in Afghanistan
Popravek Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1049/2011 z dne 20. oktobra 2011 o izvajanju člena 11(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 753/2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim posameznikom, skupinam, podjetjem in subjektom zaradi razmer v Afganistanu
On page 3, Annex, point (1):
Stran 3, Priloga, točka 1:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1050/2011
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1050/2011
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, an application from India received on 12 November 2007 to register the name ‘Darjeeling’ as a protected geographical indication was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Vloga Indije za registracijo imena „Darjeeling“ kot zaščitene geografske označbe, ki je bila prejeta 12. novembra 2007, je bila v skladu s členom 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
Germany, France, Italy, Austria, the United Kingdom and a citizen of India lodged objections to such registration under Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Nemčija, Francija, Italija, Avstrija, Združeno kraljestvo in indijski državljan so tej registraciji ugovarjali v skladu s členom 7(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006.
The objections were deemed admissible under points (a), (c), and (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 7(3) thereof.
Ugovori so se na podlagi točk (a), (c) in (d) prvega pododstavka člena 7(3) Uredbe šteli za sprejemljive.
By letter dated 11 June 2010, the Commission asked the Parties concerned to seek agreement among them.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 11. junija 2010 zadevne strani pozvala, naj se sporazumejo.
An agreement was reached between France and India, which resulted in introducing clarifications to the Single Document to the effect that only bulk packaging is required to take place in the geographical area and that consumer packaging may take place within or outside the geographical area.
Francija in Indija sta dosegli sporazum, ki uvaja pojasnila k enotnemu dokumentu, in sicer, da se lahko na geografskem območju izvaja samo pakiranje blaga v raztresenem stanju, medtem ko se lahko prodajni paketi pakirajo znotraj in zunaj geografskega območja.