natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was found that the most important relationship concerned common shareholdings at a very low percentage held by Japanese banks on behalf of numerous trustees.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se najpomembnejša povezava nanaša na skupne deleže v zelo nizkih odstotkih, ki so jih imele japonske banke v imenu številnih upraviteljev.
It was, therefore, established that the relationship was not of such a nature to impact price levels.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da povezava ni takšne narave, da bi vplivala na raven cen.
Indeed, given (i) the pricing/contractual arrangements outlined above which are typical for this industry and (ii) the nature of the relationship between the companies described above, prices are at arm’s length.
Dejansko so glede na (i) zgoraj opredeljene cenovne/pogodbene dogovore, ki so značilni za to industrijo, in (ii) zgoraj opisano naravo povezave med podjetji cene tržne.
It was therefore determined that the export price of the product concerned could be established on the basis of MCI’s sales to the Japanese traders.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da se lahko izvozna cena zadevnega izdelka določi na podlagi prodaje družbe MCI japonskim trgovcem.
A letter was sent to MCI informing it of the consequences of non-cooperation because during the verification in Tokyo the case handlers involved were not granted full access to accounting information relating to certain allowances.
Družbi MCI je bil poslan dopis, s katerim je bila obveščena o posledicah nesodelovanja, saj med preverjanjem v Tokiu odgovorne osebe niso imele popolnega dostopa do računovodskih informacij za določene popravke.
It was therefore decided to calculate the allowances on the basis of facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se popravki izračunajo na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev, v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
As a result the following methodology was used.
Zaradi tega je bila uporabljena naslednja metodologija.
For freight costs the allowance was adjusted upwards on the basis of information gathered on spot.
Za prevozne stroške je bil znesek popravka prilagojen navzgor na podlagi informacij, zbranih na kraju samem.
For the remaining allowances the amounts reported as well as the net sales prices were also checked by reference to other independent sources, in this case information established for the other two Thai exporting producers and were found to be in line for the same type of sales.
Za ostale popravke so bili sporočeni zneski in neto prodajne cene preverjeni s pomočjo drugih neodvisnih virov, v tem primeru informacij, pridobljenih za druga dva tajska proizvajalca izvoznika, in ugotovljena je bila skladnost pri enakih vrstah prodaje.
An alternative method of using Eurostat prices as a substitute was considered but not used because for this product the value in Eurostat was the cif price at the date of importation and not the adjusted final price established in accordance with the sales contract and the invoicing systems outlined above.
Preučena je bila alternativna metoda uporabe cen Eurostata, vendar ni bila uporabljena, ker je bila v Eurostatu vrednost za ta izdelek cena CIF ob datumu uvoza in ne prilagojena končna cena, določena v skladu s prodajno pogodbo in zgoraj opisanimi sistemi izstavljanja računov.
This approach was exceptionally appropriate given the structure of the market as explained in recital 15 above.
Ta pristop je bil glede na strukturo trga, kot je pojasnjena v uvodni izjavi 15, izjemno primeren.
Note that the vast majority of allowances had already been verified in Thailand.
Spomniti je treba, da je bila večina popravkov že preverjena na Tajskem.
The comparison between normal value and export price was made on an ex-works basis.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bila opravljena na podlagi cene franko tovarna.
On this basis, adjustments for differences in transport, insurance, packing, credit, handling and commission costs were made where applicable and justified.
Na podlagi tega so bile, kjer je bilo to primerno in upravičeno, izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v stroških prevoza, zavarovanja, pakiranja, kredita, manipulativnih stroških ter stroških provizij.
The comparison between export price and normal value was made on an annual basis.
Primerjava med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo je bila izvedena na letni podlagi.
The request of the exporting producers to make comparisons on a monthly basis was considered but not pursued since it was obvious that it would not have changed the overall conclusion with respect to dumping, i.e. the countrywide de minimis dumping.
Zahteva proizvajalcev izvoznikov, da se primerjave izvajajo mesečno, je bila preučena, vendar ni bila izpolnjena, saj je bilo očitno, da ne bi spremenila splošne ugotovitve glede dampinga, tj. dampinga de minimis na ravni države.
Pursuant to Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin for the cooperating exporting producers in Thailand were established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price as established above.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike na Tajskem določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno, kot je določeno zgoraj.
On the basis of the above methodology the dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif Union frontier price, duty unpaid, were set as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedene metodologije so stopnje dampinga, izražene kot delež cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
No dumping
Ni dampinga
The three exporting producers (the two of the Indorama group and SMPC) represent the entirety of exports originating in Thailand when compared to the Eurostat data.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki (oba iz skupine Indorama in SMPC) ob primerjavi s podatki Eurostata predstavljajo celoten izvoz s poreklom iz Tajske.
It was found that this margin was below de minimis, i.e. 1,8 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je stopnja pod pragom de minimis, tj. 1,8 %.
In view of the countrywide de minimis dumping margin, provisional measures on imports of PTA originating in Thailand should not be imposed.
Glede na stopnjo dampinga de minimis na ravni države ni treba uvesti začasnih ukrepov na uvoz PTA s poreklom iz Tajske.
In view of the above findings with respect to dumping it is not considered necessary to present any analysis on injury, causation and Union interest.
Glede na navedene ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom se šteje, da ni treba predstaviti analize o škodi, vzročni zvezi in interesu Unije.
The proceeding should therefore be terminated as the dumping margin determined for Thailand is less than 2 %.
Postopek je zato treba zaključiti, saj je stopnja dampinga, ugotovljena za Tajsko, nižja od 2 %.
As to dumping issues, comments were received from one of the complainants which considered that the Commission should have imputed to SMPC the dumping margin established for the other two exporting producers (3,7 %) as a consequence of facts available.
Glede vprašanj dampinga so bile prejete pripombe od enega pritožnika, ki je menil, da bi morala Komisija zaradi ugotovljenih dejstev za SMPC uporabiti stopnjo dampinga, ugotovljeno za druga dva proizvajalca izvoznika (3,7 %).
In such a case it was argued that there would have been a de minimis dumping margin.
Trdilo se je, da bi bila v takšnem primeru stopnja dampinga de minimis.
The Commission did apply facts available with respect to the Japanese related company by using the company’s available data, adjusting it upwards and comparing it to other verifiable sources.
Komisija je uporabila razpoložljiva dejstva glede povezane družbe z Japonske, saj je uporabila podatke družbe, ki so bili na voljo, jih prilagodila navzgor in primerjala z drugimi preverljivimi viri.
To impute in these circumstances the dumping margin of the other exporters would not have been in line with the provisions of Article 18.
Obremenitev družbe s stopnjo dampinga drugih izvoznikov v teh okoliščinah ne bi bila v skladu z določbami člena 18.
The same complainant also argued that other governments take a different view on investigations concerning PTA for a similar IP.
Isti pritožnik je trdil tudi, da imajo druge vlade drugačen pogled na preiskave v zvezi s PTA v podobnem OP.
In this respect it is noted that the evidence provided by the party refers to an anti-dumping duty imposed by the People’s Republic of China on imports of PTA from Korea and Thailand.
V zvezi s tem je treba spomniti, da se dokazi, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, nanašajo na protidampinško dajatev, ki jo je Ljudska republika Kitajska uvedla na uvoz PTA iz Koreje in Tajske.
The information provided cannot corroborate the party’s claim since no evidence exists on how normal value and export price were established in this Chinese anti-dumping investigation.
Predložene informacije ne potrjujejo trditve te strani, saj ni nobenega dokaza o tem, kako sta bili normalna vrednost in izvozna cena določeni v tej kitajski protidampinški preiskavi.
In conclusion, no comments from any interested party undermine the finding that protective measures are unnecessary.
Nobena pripomba zainteresiranih strani torej ne spodbija ugotovitve, da zaščitni ukrepi niso potrebni.
In light of all the above, the Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of purified terephthalic acid and its salts originating in Thailand should be terminated without the imposition of anti-dumping measures,
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je Komisija zato sklenila, da se protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom prečiščene tereftalne kisline in njenih soli s poreklom iz Tajske v Unijo zaključi brez uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov –
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of terephthalic acid and its salts of a purity by weight of 99,5 % or more, currently falling within CN code ex29173600, originating in Thailand, is hereby terminated.
Protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom tereftalne kisline in njenih soli s čistočo 99,5 mas. % ali več, trenutno uvrščen v oznako KN ex29173600, s poreklom iz Tajske, se zaključi.
See page 17 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 17 tega uradnega lista.
Furthermore, in the investigation by the Chinese authorities, the IP runs from 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2008, while the IP used in the current EU investigation runs from 1 December 2008 to 30 November 2009.
Poleg tega OP v preiskavi kitajskih organov zajema obdobje od 1. oktobra 2007 do 30. septembra 2008, medtem ko OP iz trenutne preiskave EU zajema obdobje od 1. decembra 2008 do 30. novembra 2009.
Therefore the periods taken into consideration in the EU and the Chinese investigations were very different.
Zato se obdobje, obravnavano v EU, močno razlikuje od obdobja v kitajski preiskavi.
on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the general principles for the participation of Ukraine in Union programmes
o sklenitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju o vzpostavitvi partnerstva med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Ukrajino na drugi strani o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Ukrajino o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Ukrajine v programih Unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 114, 168, 169 and 172, Article 173(3), and Articles 188 and 192, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) and the first subparagraph of Article 218(8), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti členov 114, 168, 169, 172, 173(3), 188 in 192 v povezavi s členom 218(6)(a) in prvim pododstavkom člena 218(8) Pogodbe,
The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part [1], on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the general principles for the participation of Ukraine in Union programmes (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Protocol’) was signed on behalf of the Union on 22 November 2010.
Protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju o vzpostavitvi partnerstva med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Ukrajino na drugi strani [1] o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Ukrajino o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Ukrajine v programih Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol) je bil v imenu Unije podpisan 22. novembra 2010.
As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community.
(2) Evropska unija je zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2009 nadomestila in nasledila Evropsko skupnost.
The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine on the general principles for the participation of Ukraine in Union programmes [2] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Protocol’) is hereby approved on behalf of the European Union.
Protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju o vzpostavitvi partnerstva med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Ukrajino na drugi strani o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Ukrajino o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Ukrajine v programih Unije [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol) se odobri v imenu Evropske unije.
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 10 of the Protocol.
Predsednik Sveta v imenu Unije pošlje uradno obvestilo iz člena 10 Protokola.
Political and Security Committee Decision BiH/17/2011
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora BiH/17/2011
(2011/35/CFSP)
(2011/35/SZVP)
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38, second paragraph, thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti drugega odstavka člena 38 Pogodbe,
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP of 12 July 2004 on a European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina [1], and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2004/570/SZVP z dne 12. julija 2004 o vojaški operaciji Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini [1] in zlasti člena 6(1) Skupnega ukrepa,
Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take decisions on the appointment of the EU Operation Commander.
Svet je v skladu s členom 6(1) Skupnega ukrepa 2004/570/SZVP pooblastil Politični in varnostni odbor za sprejemanje sklepov o imenovanju poveljnika operacije EU.
According to Political and Security Committee Decision BiH/10/2007 of 25 September 2007 on the appointment of an EU Operation Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina [2], Deputy Supreme Allied Commander for Europe (DSACEUR) General John McCOLL was appointed EU Operation Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
V skladu s Sklepom Političnega in varnostnega odbora BiH/10/2007 z dne 25. septembra 2007 o imenovanju poveljnika operacije EU za vojaško operacijo Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini [2] je bil general John McCOLL, namestnik vrhovnega poveljnika zavezniških sil v Evropi (DSACEUR), imenovan za poveljnika operacije EU za vojaško operacijo Evropske Unije v Bosni in Hercegovini.
NATO has decided to appoint General Sir Richard SHIRREFF as DSACEUR to replace General John McCOLL.
NATO je na mesto generala Johna McCOLLA sklenil imenovati generala Richarda SHIRREFFA.
In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications.
V skladu s členom 5 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, priloženega k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Danska ne sodeluje pri pripravi in izvajanju sklepov in ukrepov Unije, ki zadevajo obrambo.
The Copenhagen European Council adopted on 12 and 13 December 2002 a declaration stating that the ‘Berlin plus’ arrangements and the implementation thereof will apply only to those Member States of the Union which are also either NATO members or parties to the ‘Partnership for Peace’, and which have consequently concluded bilateral security agreements with NATO,
(5) Evropski svet je na zasedanju v Københavnu 12. in 13. decembra 2002 sprejel izjavo, v skladu s katero se ureditev „Berlin plus“ uporablja in izvaja le za tiste države članice Unije, ki so tudi članice zveze NATO ali pogodbenice „Partnerstva za mir“ in so zato sklenile dvostranske sporazume o varnosti z zvezo NATO –
General Sir Richard SHIRREFF is hereby appointed EU Operation Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
General Richard SHIRREFF je imenovan za poveljnika operacije EU za vojaško operacijo Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini.
This Decision shall enter into force on 4 March 2011.
Ta sklep začne veljati 4. marca 2011.
OJ L 293, 10.11.2007, p. 8.
UL L 293, 10.11.2007, str. 8.
The assignment of General Sir Richard SHIRREFF will begin on 4 March 2011.
General Richard SHIRREFF prične z opravljanjem dolžnosti 4. marca 2011.
General Sir Richard SHIRREFF should also replace General John McCOLL in his capacity as EU Operation Commander for the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
General Richard SHIRREFF bi moral tudi nadomestiti generala Johna McCOLLA v vlogi poveljnika operacije EU za vojaško operacijo Evropske Unije v Bosni in Hercegovini.
of 20 January 2011
z dne 20. januarja 2011
concerning the non-inclusion of 1,3-dichloropropene in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
o nevključitvi 1,3-dikloropropena v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS
By Commission Decision 2007/619/EC [2] it was decided not to include the active substance 1,3-dichloropropene in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2007/619/ES [2] je bilo odločeno, da se aktivna snov 1,3-dikloropropen ne vključi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The original notifier submitted a new application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 of 17 January 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/414/EEC as regards a regular and an accelerated procedure for the assessment of active substances which were part of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of that Directive but have not been included into its Annex I [5].
Prvotni prijavitelj je vložil nov zahtevek v skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 33/2008 z dne 17. januarja 2008 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS glede rednega in pospešenega postopka za oceno aktivnih snovi, ki so bile del delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) navedene direktive, vendar niso bile vključene v Prilogo I [5].
It requested the application of the accelerated procedure pursuant to Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 and submitted an updated dossier.
Zahteval je uporabo pospešenega postopka v skladu s poglavjem III Uredbe (ES) št. 33/2008 in predložil posodobljeno dokumentacijo.
The application was submitted to Spain, which had been designated rapporteur Member State by Regulation (EC) No 451/2000.
Zahtevek je bil predložen Španiji, ki je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 451/2000 določena kot država članica poročevalka.
Spain evaluated the new information and data submitted by the notifier and prepared an additional report on 15 April 2009.
Španija je ocenila nove informacije in podatke, ki jih je predložil prijavitelj, ter 15. aprila 2009 predložila dodatno poročilo.
The additional report was peer reviewed by the Member States and the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘EFSA’, and presented to the Commission on 30 September 2009 in the format of the EFSA Conclusion for 1,3-dichloropropene [6].
Dodatno poročilo so pregledali strokovnjaki držav članic in Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EFSA) ter ga 30. septembra 2009 predstavili Komisiji v obliki znanstvenega poročila EFSA o 1,3-dikloropropenu [6].
This report was reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 9 July 2010 in the format of the Commission review report for 1,3-dichloropropene.
To poročilo so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 9. julija 2010 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu glede 1,3-dikloropropena.
The new assessment by the rapporteur Member State and the new conclusion by the EFSA concentrated on the concerns that lead to the non-inclusion, which were due to the release in the environment of large amounts of known and unknown polychlorinated impurities, for which no information on persistency, toxicological behaviour, uptake from crops, accumulation, metabolic fate and residue level were available, as well as to the inconclusive nature of the consumer risk assessment and to the risk of groundwater potential contamination, for birds, mammals, aquatic organisms and other non-target organism.
V novi oceni države članice poročevalke in sklepu EFSA so bili analizirani zlasti pomisleki, zaradi kateri aktivna snov ni bila vključena, kot so sproščanje v okolje večjih količin znanih in neznanih polikloriranih nečistot, za katere ni dostopnih podatkov o obstojnosti, toksikološkem obnašanju, sprejemu iz pridelka, kopičenju, presnovi in mejni vrednosti, ter nezmožnost ocene tveganja za potrošnike, morebitno tveganje za onesnaženje podtalnice in tveganje za ptice, sesalce, vodne organizme in druge neciljne organizme.
New data and information were submitted by the notifier in the updated dossier to address the concerns which lead to the non-inclusion, in particular as regards the identity of a number of impurities, the level of residues expected in crops, the risk to groundwater contamination and the risk to birds, mammals, aquatic organisms and non-target organisms.
Prijavitelj je v posodobljeni dokumentaciji predložil nove podatke in informacije v zvezi s pomisleki, zaradi katerih aktivna snov ni bila vključena, zlasti glede identitete številnih nečistot, pričakovane ravni ostankov v pridelkih, tveganja za onesnaženje podtalnice in tveganja za ptice, sesalce, vodne organizme in neciljne organizme.
A new assessment was performed, as included in the additional report and in the EFSA Conclusion for 1,3-dichloropropene.
Opravljena je bila nova ocena, ki je bila vključena v dodatno poročilo in znanstveno poročilo EFSA o 1,3-dikloropropenu.
In particular, there is a concern for the consumer exposure in relation to 11 unidentified manufacturing impurities.
Zlasti obstaja pomislek glede izpostavljenosti potrošnikov enajstim neopredeljenim proizvajalnim nečistotam.
Furthermore, the potential contamination of groundwater in relation to 1,3-dichloropropene, its relevant toxic breakdown product (EZ)-3-chloroacrylic acid and 11 unidentified manufacturing impurities were not adequately addressed and there is a potential for long-range transport through the atmosphere of 10 manufacturing impurities.
Poleg tega morebitno onesnaženje podtalnice z 1,3-dikloropropenom, njegovim pomembnim toksičnim razgradnim produktom (EZ)-3-kloroakrilno kislino in enajstimi neopredeljenimi proizvodnimi nečistotami niso bili ustrezno obravnavani, zato obstaja možnost prenosa desetih proizvajalnih nečistot po zraku na dolge razdalje.
In addition, the risk to non-target organisms was not demonstrated to be acceptable.
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazano, da je tveganje za neciljne organizme sprejemljivo.