natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (‘the previous expiry review’), the Council maintained these measures by Regulation (EC) No 1736/2004 of 4 October 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of synthetic fibre ropes originating in India [3].
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe („prejšnji pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov“) je Svet ohranil te ukrepe z Uredbo (ES) št. 1736/2004 z dne 4. oktobra 2004 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz vrvi iz sintetičnih vlaken s poreklom iz Indije [3].
A request for an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation was lodged on 4 May 2009 by the Liaison Committee of the EU Twine, Cordage and Netting Industries (Eurocord) (‘the applicant’) on behalf of Union producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the Union production of synthetic fibre ropes.
Zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je 4. maja 2009 vložil Liaison Committee of EU Twine, Cordage and Netting Industries (Eurocord) („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje vrvi iz sintetičnih vlaken v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka veljavnosti ukrepov damping in škoda za industrijo Unije verjetno ponovila.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of a review, the Commission announced on 7 October 2009, by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda, zato je 7. oktobra 2009 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation concerning the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2009 (the ‘review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava v zvezi z verjetnostjo nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2008 do 30. septembra 2009 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period between 1 January 2006 and the end of the RIP (the ‘period considered’).
Preučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Parties concerned by this investigation
Strani, ki jih zadeva ta preiskava
The Commission officially advised the known Union producers, the exporters and exporting producers in the country concerned, the representatives of the country concerned, importers as well as an association of users which were known to be concerned, of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je uradno obvestila znane proizvajalce Unije, izvoznike in proizvajalce izvoznike v zadevni državi, predstavnike zadevne države, uvoznike in združenje uporabnikov, ki jih je preiskava zadevala, o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limits set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim stranem je bila dana možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the apparent high number of Union producers and exporting producers in India, it was considered appropriate, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to examine whether sampling should be used.
Zaradi domnevno velikega števila proizvajalcev Unije in proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Indiji se je zdelo primerno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe prouči, ali je treba uporabiti vzorčenje.
A total of five Indian producers, two of which belonging to the same group, came forward and provided the requested information within the given deadline and expressed a wish to be included in the sample.
Javilo se je pet indijskih proizvajalcev, od katerih sta dva pripadala isti skupini, ter predložilo zahtevane informacije v določenem roku in izrazilo željo po vključitvi v vzorec.
Four of these five companies produced and exported the product concerned to the Union market during the RIP.
Štiri od teh petih družb so proizvajale in izvažale zadevni izdelek na trg Unije med OPP.
The fifth company did not export the product concerned to the Union market during the RIP.
Peta družba ni izvažala zadevnega izdelka na trg Unije med OPP.
All five companies were regarded as cooperating companies and were considered for sampling.
Vseh pet družb je bilo obravnavanih kot sodelujoče družbe in so bile obravnavane za vzorčenje.
The level of cooperation from India, i.e. the percentage of exports to the Union by the Indian cooperating companies as compared to all Indian exports to the Union could not be calculated as the total exports to the Union during the RIP reported by the five cooperating companies was significantly higher than the volume registered by Eurostat for all exports from India, for the reasons detailed in recitals 21 to 23.
Ravni sodelovanja iz Indije, tj. odstotka izvoza indijskih sodelujočih družb v Unijo v primerjavi s celotnim indijskim izvozom v Unijo, ni bilo mogoče izračunati, saj je bil celoten izvoz v Unijo med OPP, o katerem je poročalo pet sodelujočih družb, znatno večji od obsega, ki ga je zabeležil Eurostat za ves izvoz iz Indije, in sicer iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah od (21) do (23).
The sample was selected in agreement with the Indian authorities and included those four companies which reported export sales to the Union.
Vzorec je bil izbran v dogovoru z indijskimi organi in je vključeval tiste štiri družbe, ki so poročale o izvozu v Unijo.
Two of the four sampled companies were related.
Dve od štirih vzorčenih družb sta bili povezani.
It is recalled that in the original investigation only one exporting producer cooperated and it is at present subject to an individual anti-dumping duty.
Treba je opozoriti, da je v prvotni preiskavi sodeloval le eden proizvajalec izvoznik, za katerega trenutno velja individualna protidampinška dajatev.
It is also recalled that in the previous expiry review none of the Indian exporting producers cooperated and therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation, the findings were based on the facts available.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da v prejšnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa ni sodeloval noben od indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, zato so v skladu z določbami člena 18(1) osnovne uredbe ugotovitve temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
Eighteen Union producers (all fifteen complainants and three further producers, altogether representing 78 % of the total Union production) provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Osemnajst proizvajalcev Unije (vseh petnajst pritožnikov in trije drugi proizvajalci, ki skupaj pomenijo 78 % celotne proizvodnje Unije) je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
On the basis of the information received from the cooperating Union producers, the Commission selected a sample of five Union producers representing approximately 40 % of the Union industry, as defined in recital 40, and about half of the sales by all cooperating Union producers to unrelated customers in the Union.
Na podlagi informacij, prejetih od sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije, je Komisija izbrala vzorec petih proizvajalcev Unije, ki pomenijo približno 40 % industrije Unije, kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi (40), in okoli polovico prodaje vseh sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije nepovezanim kupcem v Uniji.
The sample was selected on the basis of the largest representative sales volume and geographical coverage of producers within the Union that could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Vzorec je bil izbran na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega prodaje in geografske pokritosti proizvajalcev znotraj Unije, ki bi ga v razpoložljivem času bilo razumno mogoče pregledati.
One of the five sampled Union producers started operating during the period considered, therefore their data were not used in the analysis of the trends of injury indicators, in order to avoid distortions in those trends.
Eden od petih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije je začel delovati v obravnavanem obdobju, zato njegovi podatki niso bili uporabljeni v analizi gibanj kazalcev škode, da bi se izognili izkrivljanju navedenih gibanj.
Nonetheless the figures of the other four sampled Union producers used for the analysis of those trends remained representative.
Kljub temu pa so podatki ostalih štirih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, uporabljeni v analizi navedenih gibanj, ostali reprezentativni.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the five sampled Union producers as well as to the four sampled Indian exporting producers.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike petim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije in štirim vzorčenim indijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
Questionnaire replies were received from all five sampled Union producers.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je poslalo vseh pet vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
Out of the four sampled Indian exporting producers, one ceased cooperating while the other three (two of which related) replied to the questionnaire within the given deadlines.
Eden od štirih vzorčenih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je prenehal sodelovati, medtem ko so drugi trije (dva od njih sta povezana) izpolnjene vprašalnike poslali pravočasno.
For this reason, in the end, the sample of Indian exporting producers consisted of those three Indian companies that replied to the questionnaire.
Iz tega razloga je na koncu vzorec indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zajemal tiste tri indijske družbe, ki so odgovorile na vprašalnik.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary to determine the continuation or likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury and of the Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za določitev nadaljevanja ali verjetnosti ponovitve dampinga in škode ter za določitev interesa Unije.
Cordoaria Oliveira SÁ (Portugal),
Cordoaria Oliveira SÁ (Portugalska),
Eurorope SA (Greece),
Eurorope SA (Grčija),
Lankhorst Euronete Ropes (Portugal),
Lankhorst Euronete Ropes (Portugalska),
(Austria).
(Avstrija).
The product concerned is the same as in the original investigation and is defined as follows: twine, cordage, ropes and cables, whether or not plaited or braided and whether or not impregnated, coated, covered or sheathed with rubber or plastics, of polyethylene or polypropylene, other than binder and baler twine, measuring more than 50000 decitex (5 g/m), as well as of other synthetic fibres of nylon or other polyamides or of polyesters, measuring more than 50000 decitex (5 g/m).
Zadevni izdelek je enak kot pri prvotni preiskavi in je opredeljen, kot sledi: vrvi, vrvje, motvozi, konopci in kabli, vključno prepletene ali vpletene, impregnirane, prevlečene, prekrite, obložene z gumo ali plastično maso, iz polietilena ali polipropilena, razen vrvi za povezovanje ali strojno pakiranje, številke več kot 50000 deciteksov (5 g/m), ter iz drugih sintetičnih vlaken iz najlona ali drugih poliamidov ali iz poliestrov, številke več kot 50000 deciteksov (5 g/m).
It is currently falling within CN codes 56074911, 56074919, 56075011. and 56075019.
Zadevni izdelek je trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN 56074911, 56074919, 56075011 in 56075019.
The product concerned is used for a wide variety of marine and industrial applications, in particular for shipping (especially for mooring purposes), and the fishing industry.
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja za široko paleto pomorskih in industrijskih uporab, zlasti na področju pomorskih prevozov (še posebno za priveze) in ribiške industrije.
One interested party claimed that the mooring ropes referred to above are not falling within the definition of the product concerned as, due to the splices attached to these ropes, such products should be declared as ‘articles of ropes’ which belong to another CN code (see also in recital 23).
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da zgoraj navedeni motvozi za privez ne spadajo v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, ker je treba zaradi spojev, ki so pritrjeni na te motvoze, take izdelke deklarirati kot „izdelke iz motvozov“, ki so uvrščeni pod drugo oznako KN (glej tudi uvodno izjavo (23)).
It should be noted however, that the reference to mooring ropes is made only in the context of applications of different types of the product concerned which are all defined as synthetic fibre ropes as set out in recital 16.
Vendar je treba navesti, da se sklic na motvoze za privez uporablja samo v okviru uporab različnih vrst zadevnega izdelka, ki so vse opredeljene kot vrvi iz sintetičnih vlaken, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi (16).
As shown in the original investigation, and as confirmed in the present investigation, the product concerned and the synthetic fibre ropes produced and sold by the Indian exporting producers on their domestic market, as well as those produced and sold by the Union producers in the Union, are in all respects identical and share the same basic physical and chemical characteristics.
Kot se je izkazalo v prvotni preiskavi in kot potrjuje ta preiskava, zadevni izdelek in vrvi iz sintetičnih vlaken, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo indijski proizvajalci izvozniki na domačem trgu, ter vrvi iz sintetičnih vlaken, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Unije na trgu Unije, so v vseh pogledih enaki ter imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti.
Therefore, they are considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ti izdelki štejejo za podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
One interested party has claimed that the product manufactured by the Union industry is not comparable with the product concerned given that the Union producers had started using a new type of raw material called Dyneema, which is much more expensive than other raw materials as products based on it have much better resistance.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da izdelka, ki ga proizvaja industrija Unije, ni mogoče primerjati z zadevnim izdelkom, saj so proizvajalci Unije začeli uporabljati novo vrsto surovin, imenovano Dyneema, ki je veliko dražja od drugih surovin, ker so iz nje izdelani izdelki precej bolj odporni.
Indeed the sampled Indian producers are not using this type of raw material.
Vzorčeni indijski proizvajalci dejansko ne uporabljajo te vrste surovine.
However, it should firstly be noted that the products in question represent only a small part of the products sold by Union producers.
Vendar pa je treba najprej navesti, da zadevni izdelki pomenijo le majhen del izdelkov, ki jih prodajajo proizvajalci Unije.
Indeed, albeit it is correct that this type of fibre is increasingly used by some Union producers, Dyneema ropes account for only a minor fraction of Union production.
Čeprav nekateri proizvajalci v Uniji vse pogosteje uporabljajo to vrsto vlakna, pa vrvi iz surovine Dyneema dejansko predstavljajo le majhen del proizvodnje Unije.
Therefore, while the significant difference in the cost of raw material (potentially around 25-30 times more expensive) can have some impact notably on the injury indicator concerning the average sales price of the Union industry, the impact of Dyneema ropes on the overall assessment remains limited due to the overwhelming quantity of ‘standard’ ropes produced in the Union.
Medtem ko lahko znatne razlike med stroški surovin (lahko so okrog 25–30-krat dražje) zlasti lahko nekoliko vplivajo na kazalnik škode v zvezi s povprečno prodajno ceno industrije Unije, pa je vpliv vrvi iz surovine Dyneema na celovito oceno še vedno omejen zaradi ogromne količine „standardnih vrvi“, ki se proizvajajo v Uniji.
Secondly, all calculations of this expiry review were based on the comparison of corresponding product types, which takes account of different raw materials.
Drugič, vsi izračuni tega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov so temeljili na primerjavi ustreznih vrst izdelka, pri kateri so bile upoštevane različne surovine.
Therefore the calculations cannot be distorted by a difference in the product mix.
Zato razlika v različnih vrstah izdelka ne more izkrivljati izračunov.
In any event, the product which uses the raw materials such as Dyneema, still has the same basic physical and chemical characteristics as the product concerned.
Vsekakor ima izdelek, za katerega se uporablja surovina, kot je na primer Dyneema, še vedno enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti kot zadevni izdelek.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was likely to continue or recur upon a possible expiry of the measures in force against India.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo preučeno, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping nadaljeval ali ponovil zaradi morebitnega prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov, ki veljajo za Indijo.
On the basis of Eurostat data, the volume of imports of the product concerned from India was insignificant throughout the period considered.
Na podlagi podatkov Eurostata je bil obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Indije v obravnavanem obdobju zanemarljiv.
During the RIP, the volume of imports from India was 31 tonnes i.e. less than 0,1 % of Union consumption during the RIP:
Med OPP je obseg uvoza iz Indije znašal 31 ton, tj. manj kot 0,1 % potrošnje Unije med OPP.
Imports of the product concerned from India, source - Comext
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Indije, vir - Comext
However, according to verified data, the three companies included in the sample shipped significantly higher volumes of the product concerned to the Union during the RIP than the volumes reported in Eurostat.
Vendar pa so po preverjenih podatkih tri družbe, vključene v vzorec, v Unijo odpremile veliko večje količine zadevnega izdelka med OPP, kot jih je sporočil Eurostat.
In this respect it is recalled that in the original investigation, importers provided information showing that some quantities of the product concerned purchased from India had not been released into free circulation on the Union market but were put into bonded warehouses and sold to ocean-going ships or offshore platforms.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so v prvotni preiskavi uvozniki predložili informacije, ki kažejo na to, da nekaj količin zadevnega izdelka, nabavljenega iz Indije, ni bilo sproščenih v prosti promet na trgu Unije, temveč so bile dane v carinska skladišča in prodane čezoceankam ali naftnim ploščadim.
One complaining producer reiterated this argument in the present investigation.
En proizvajalec pritožnik je ta argument ponovil v tej preiskavi.
Due to lack of cooperation of port traders in the investigation, this claim could not be verified.
Zaradi pomanjkanja sodelovanja pristaniških trgovcev v preiskavi te trditve ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
However, on the basis of the customer list submitted by the sampled exporting producers, it was apparent that most of the customers were indeed shipping, maritime and offshore suppliers in the Union ports.
Vendar pa je bilo na podlagi seznama kupcev, ki so ga predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, jasno, da so bili kupci večinoma ladijski, pomorski in naftni dobavitelji v pristaniščih Unije.
On the basis of the above, it appears that the difference between the statistical data and the reported figures is due to such sales.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se zdi, da je razlika med statističnimi podatki in sporočenimi podatki posledica takih prodaj.
It should also be mentioned that the request for expiry review contained allegations of circumvention practices.
Treba je tudi navesti, da je zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov vključeval trditve glede obstoja praks izogibanja.
In this respect, the applicant claimed that certain volumes of synthetic fibre ropes from India entered into the Union under CN heading 5609 (Articles of […] twine, cordage, ropes or cables) which is not subject to measures.
V zvezi s tem je vložnik navedel, da je nekaj količin vrvi iz sintetičnih vlaken iz Indije v Unijo prišlo pod tarifno številko 5609 (izdelki iz […] vrvi, vrvja, motvozov, konopcev in kablov), ki pa ni predmet ukrepov.
However, no information was found in the present investigation to support this view.
Vendar pa nobena informacija iz te preiskave ni podprla tega stališča.
On the basis of the above, it is considered that 31 tonnes of the product concerned were actually imported from India into the customs territory of the Union in the RIP.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se šteje, da je bilo 31 ton zadevnega izdelka dejansko uvoženih iz Indije na carinsko območje Unije v OPP.
As concerns the verified export sales to the Union ports, which had not been released into free circulation on the Union market by the three sampled Indian producers, these sales are considered as part of Indian exports to other third countries.
V zvezi s preverjenim izvozom treh vzorčenih indijskih proizvajalcev v pristanišča Unije, ki ni bil sproščen v prosti promet na trgu Unije, se ta izvoz šteje za del indijskega izvoza v druge tretje države.
Given the absence of significant import volumes from India into the Union, these did not form a basis for a representative analysis for the likelihood of a continuation of dumping or injury.
Ker ni bilo velikega obsega uvoza iz Indije v Unijo, tudi ni podlage za reprezentativno analizo verjetnosti nadaljevanja dampinga ali škode.
Indeed in view of such limited actual import volumes it cannot be concluded that injurious dumping from India existed during the RIP.
Zaradi omejenega obsega uvoza dejansko ni mogoče sklepati, da je med OPP obstajal škodljiv damping iz Indije.
Therefore, the analysis focused on the likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury should the measures be allowed to expire.
Zato je bila analiza osredotočena na verjetnost ponovitve dampinga in škode v primeru izteka ukrepov.
Likely development of imports should measures be repealed
Verjeten razvoj uvoza ob razveljavitvi ukrepov
It has been examined whether there is unused production capacity in the country concerned which would create a potential for the resumption of dumped exports in case the measures were repealed.
Preučeno je bilo, ali v zadevni državi obstaja neizkoriščena proizvodna zmogljivost, ki bi ustvarila možnost nadaljevanja dampinškega izvoza v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov.
It has been found that the production capacity of the three sampled exporting producers sharply increased between 2007 and the RIP while capacity utilisation decreased at the same time.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je proizvodna zmogljivost treh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov med letom 2007 in OPP strmo narasla, medtem ko se je v istem obdobju izkoriščenost zmogljivosti zmanjšala.
The spare capacities of the three companies were around 75 % of Union consumption in the RIP.
Proste zmogljivosti treh družb so v OPP znašale okoli 75 % potrošnje Unije.
This points to a likely increase in export volumes to the Union should the measures be allowed to expire.
To kaže na verjetno povečanje obsega izvoza v Unijo v primeru izteka ukrepov.
Concerning the other producers of synthetic fibre ropes in India, it is known that Garware, the company which stopped cooperation after the sampling phase, is an important producer and, according to its official website, it has a significant production capacity.
V zvezi z drugimi proizvajalci vrvi iz sintetičnih vlaken v Indiji je znano, da je Garware, družba, ki je prenehala sodelovati po fazi vzorčenja, pomembna proizvajalka in ima po navedbah na njeni uradni spletni strani precejšnje proizvodne zmogljivosti.