natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
European Communities-Antidumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Tyle Bed Linen from India: Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by India WT/DS141/AB/RW (8 April 2003), paragraphs 82-86; Council Regulation (EC) No 1515/2001 of 23 July 2001 on the measures that may be taken by the Community following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 10); Council Regulation (EC) No 436/2004 of 8 March 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1784/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain malleable cast iron tube or pipe fittings originating in Brazil, the Czech Republic, Japan, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Thailand (OJ L 72, 11.3.2004, p. 15) following Reports adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body of the WTO.
Evropske skupnosti – protidampinške dajatve na uvoz posteljnine iz bombaža s poreklom iz Indije: Indija je uporabila člen 21.5 Dogovora o reševanju sporov WT/DS141/AB/RW (8. april 2003), odstavki 82–86; Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1515/2001 z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih, ki jih Skupnost lahko uvede na podlagi poročila, ki ga sprejme Organ STO za reševanje sporov v zvezi s protidampinškimi in protisubvencijskimi zadevami (UL L 201, 26.7.2001, str. 10); Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 436/2004 z dne 8. marca 2004 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2000 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene pri uvozu nekaterih tempranih litoželeznih cevnih pritrdilnih elementov s poreklom iz Brazilije, Češke, Japonske, Ljudske republike Kitajske, Republike Koreje in Tajske, po poročilih, ki jih je sprejel Organ STO za reševanje sporov (UL L 72, 11.3.2004, str. 15).
Paragraph 111 of the Court of Justice judgment.
Odstavek 111 sodbe Sodišča.
On 1 October 2009, the Court of Justice in its judgment in case C-141/08 P (‘the Court of Justice judgment’) set aside the previous judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2008.
Sodišče je 1. oktobra 2009 v svoji sodbi o zadevi C-141/08 P („sodba Sodišča“) razveljavilo prejšnjo sodbo Splošnega sodišča z dne 29. januarja 2008.
By its judgment the Court of Justice found that Foshan Shunde’s rights of defence were adversely affected by the infringement of Article 20(5) of the basic Regulation.
Sodišče je v sodbi ugotovilo, da je bila družbi Foshan Shunde kršena pravica do obrambe zaradi kršitve člena 20(5) osnovne uredbe.
Moreover, according to Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Union institutions are obliged to comply with the Court of Justice judgment of 1 October 2009.
Poleg tega morajo institucije Evropske unije v skladu s členom 266 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije upoštevati sodbo Sodišča z dne 1. oktobra 2009.
This also implies the possibility to remedy the aspects of the contested Regulation which led to its annulment, while leaving unchanged the uncontested parts which are not affected by the Court of Justice judgment – as was held in case C-458/98 P [5] (‘the IPS appeal case’).
To pomeni tudi, da se lahko uredba v delu, v katerem je bila izpodbijana in zaradi katerega je bila razglašena za nično, popravi, ob tem pa se deli, ki niso bili izpodbijani in o katerih Sodišče ni odločalo, ne spremenijo, kakor to izhaja iz zadeve C-458/98 P [5] („pritožba IPS“).
Foshan Shunde and all other interested parties were given an opportunity to comment on this revised disclosure document.
Družba Foshan Shunde in vse druge zainteresirane strani so imele možnost predložiti pripombe k revidiranemu dokumentu o razkritju.
The oral and written arguments submitted were considered and, where appropriate, were taken into account.
Predložene pisne in ustne pripombe so bile obravnavane, in kjer je bilo to primerno, upoštevane.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 806/2010
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 806/2010
amending Regulations (EC) No 1292/2007 and (EC) No 367/2006 as regards the granting of an exemption from the measures imposed under those Regulations to one Israeli exporter of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India and terminating the registration of imports from that exporter
o spremembah uredb (ES) št. 1292/2007 in (ES) št. 367/2006 zaradi odobritve izvzetja iz ukrepov, naloženih v skladu z navedenima uredbama izraelskemu izvozniku folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije in prenehanju registracije uvoza za navedenega izvoznika
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic anti-dumping Regulation) and in particular Articles 11(4) and 13(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna protidampinška uredba“), zlasti člena 11(4) in člena 13(4) Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (the basic anti-subsidy Regulation) and in particular Articles 20, 23(5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] („osnovna protisubvencijska uredba“), zlasti člena 20 ter člena 23(5) in (6) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom predložila Evropska komisija,
The Council, by Regulations (EC) No 1676/2001 [3] and (EC) No 2597/1999 [4] imposed anti-dumping and countervailing measures respectively on PET film originating, inter alia, in India (the original measures).
Svet je z uredbama (ES) št. 1676/2001 [3] in (ES) št. 2597/1999 [4] uvedel protidampinške oziroma izravnalne ukrepe za folijo iz PET s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije („prvotni ukrepi“).
By Regulations (EC) No 1975/2004 [5] and (EC) No 1976/2004 [6], the Council extended these measures to PET film consigned from Israel and from Brazil (the extended measures) with the exception of imports produced by one Brazilian company, Terphane Ltd, and one Israeli company, Jolybar Ltd, specifically mentioned in each of those Regulations.
Svet je z uredbama (ES) št. 1975/2004 [5] in (ES) št. 1976/2004 [6] te ukrepe razširil na folijo iz PET, poslano iz Izraela in Brazilije („razširjeni ukrepi“), razen na uvoz izdelkov, ki jih proizvajata v obeh uredbah posebej navedeni družbi, in sicer brazilska družba Terphane Ltd in izraelska družba Jolybar Ltd.
By Regulation (EC) No 101/2006 [7] the Council amended Regulations (EC) No 1975/2004 and (EC) No 1976/2004 in order to exempt one other Israeli company, Hanita Coatings Rural Cooperative Association Ltd, from the extended measures.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 101/2006 [7] spremenil uredbi (ES) št. 1975/2004 in (ES) št. 1976/2004 zaradi izvzetja druge izraelske družbe, in sicer Hanita Coatings Rural Cooperative Association Ltd, iz razširjenih ukrepov.
Following an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 [8], imposed an anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India and maintained the extension of that duty to imports of the same product consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether or not declared as originating in Brazil or Israel, with the exception of certain producers specified in Articles 2(4) of that Regulation (the anti-dumping measures in force).
Po pregledu zaradi izteka protidampinških ukrepov je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2007 [8], uvedel protidampinško dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije in navedeno dajatev razširil na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je bil deklariran kot s poreklom iz Brazilije oziroma Izraela, z izjemo nekaterih proizvajalcev iz člena 2(4) navedene uredbe („veljavni protidampinški ukrepi“).
Following an expiry review of the countervailing measures, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [9] imposed a countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India and maintained the extension of that duty to imports of the same product consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether or not declared as originating in Brazil or Israel, with the exception of certain producers specified in Article 1(3) of that Regulation (the countervailing measures in force).
Po pregledu zaradi izteka izravnalnih ukrepov je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006 [9] uvedel izravnalno dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije in navedeno dajatev razširil na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je bil deklariran kot s poreklom iz Brazilije oziroma Izraela, z izjemo nekaterih proizvajalcev iz člena 1(3) navedene uredbe („veljavni izravnalni ukrepi“).
The anti-dumping measures in force and the countervailing measures in force shall hereinafter together be referred to as ‘the anti-dumping and countervailing measures in force’.
Za veljavne protidampinške in veljavne izravnalne ukrepe se v nadaljevanju uporablja izraz „veljavni protidampinški in izravnalni ukrepi“.
The Commission subsequently received a request for an exemption from the extended measures pursuant to Articles 11(4) and 13(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Articles 20, 23(5) and 23(6) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Komisija je naknadno prejela zahtevek za izvzetje iz razširjenih ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(4) in členom 13(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe ter členom 20 in členom 23(5) in (6) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
The Commission examined the evidence submitted by SZP and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Articles 11(4) and 13(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Articles 20, 23(5) and 23(6) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation for the purposes of determining the possibility of granting SZP an exemption from the extended measures.
Po proučitvi dokazov, ki jih je predložil SZP, je Komisija ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov, ki upravičujejo začetek preiskave v skladu s členom 11(4) in členom 13(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe ter s členom 20 in členom 23(5) in (6) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe z namenom določitve možnosti, da se SZP odobri izvzetje iz razširjenih ukrepov.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee, and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated, by Regulation (EU) No 6/2010 [11] (the initiating Regulation), a review of Regulations (EC) No 1292/2007 and (EC) No 367/2006 with regard to SZP.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom in potem, ko je zadevna industrija Unije imela možnost za pripombe, z Uredbo (ES) št. 6/2010 [11] („začetna uredba“) začela pregled uredb (ES) št. 1292/2007 in (ES) št. 367/2006 v zvezi s SZP.
The Regulation initiating the review repealed the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 with regard to imports of the product under investigation consigned from Israel by SZP.
Uredba o začetku pregleda je razveljavila protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 1292/2007 v zvezi z uvozom izdelka v preiskavi, ki ga je SZP poslal iz Izraela.
Simultaneously, pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, customs authorities were directed to take appropriate steps to register such imports.
Hkrati so carinski organi v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne protidampinške uredbe dobili navodilo, da izvedejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo tega uvoza.
The product concerned is the same as that defined in the regulations imposing the original measures, being polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India, currently falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 (the product concerned).
Zadevni izdelek je, kot je bilo opredeljeno v uredbah o uvedbi prvotnih ukrepov, folija iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, ki je trenutno uvrščena pod oznakama KN ex39206219 in ex39206290 („zadevni izdelek“).
It is considered that the PET film consigned from Israel to the Union under CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 (the product under review) has the same basic technical, physical and chemical characteristics and the same uses as the product concerned.
Šteje se, da ima folija iz PET, poslana v Unijo iz Izraela, pod oznakama KN ex39206219 in ex39206290 („izdelek v pregledu“), enake osnovne tehnične, fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter uporabe kot zadevni izdelek.
Therefore, it is considered to be a like product within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 2(c) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Zato se šteje za podobni izdelek v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in člena 2(c) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
The Commission officially advised SZP and the representatives of the country concerned of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je uradno seznanila SZP in predstavnike zadevne države o začetku pregleda.
Interested parties were invited to make their views known and informed of the possibility to request a hearing.
Zainteresirane strani so bile pozvane, da izrazijo svoja mnenja, in obveščene, da lahko zahtevajo zaslišanje.
No such request was, however, received.
Vendar ni bil prejet noben tak zahtevek.
The Commission also sent a questionnaire to SZP and received a reply within the relevant deadline.
Komisija je SZP tudi poslala vprašalnik in v določenem roku prejela odgovor.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the purposes of the review.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za pregled.
A verification visit was carried out at the premises of SZP.
Preveritveni obisk je bil izveden v prostorih SZP.
The investigation covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009 (the IP).
Obdobje preiskave je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2009 („OP“).
Data was collected from 2006 up to the end of the IP to investigate any change in the pattern of trade.
Zbrani so bili podatki od leta 2006 do konca OP, da bi se preiskala vsaka sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja.
Furthermore, according to documentary evidence submitted, SZP was able to satisfactorily demonstrate that it did not have any direct or indirect links with any of the Indian exporting producers or Israeli companies subject to the anti-dumping and countervailing measures in force.
Poleg tega je lahko SZP glede na predložena dokumentirana dokazila zadovoljivo dokazal, da ni neposredno ali posredno povezan z nobenim indijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom ali izraelsko družbo, za katere se uporabljajo veljavni protidampinški in izravnalni ukrepi.
As already mentioned in recital 14, SZP did not export the product concerned to the Union until after the period of investigation that led to the extended measures.
Kakor je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14, je SZP zadevni izdelek izvažal v Unijo šele po obdobju preiskave, ki je vodila do razširjenih ukrepov.
SZP manufactures PET film and either sells this film or uses it itself to produce a range of packaging products.
SZP proizvaja folijo iz PET in to folijo prodaja ali pa jo uporablja za proizvodnjo palete izdelkov za embaliranje.
Raw material of Indian origin, amongst others, is used by SZP to manufacture PET film exported to the Union but this was not considered to be a process involving circumvention.
SZP med drugim uporablja surovine s poreklom iz Indije za proizvodnjo folije iz PET, ki se izvaža v Unijo, vendar se ni štelo, da je šlo za izogibanje.
The Indian raw material constituted only a small proportion of the raw material bought at arms-length by SZP and was mixed with other raw materials which were mainly purchased domestically.
Indijske surovine so predstavljale le majhen delež surovin, ki jih je SZP kupil po tržnih cenah in so bile zmešane z drugimi surovinami, ki so bile večinoma kupljene na domačem trgu.
The Indian producer of the raw material is a long-standing supplier to SZP.
Indijski proizvajalec surovin je dolgoletni dobavitelj SZP.
In addition no evidence was found that SZP was purchasing finished PET film from India to resell or tranship to the European Union.
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazano, da je SZP v Indiji kupoval folijo iz PET kot končni izdelek, da bi jo preprodal ali prepeljal v Evropsko unijo.
In accordance with the above findings that SZP has not engaged in circumvention practices, the company should be exempted from the anti-dumping and countervailing measures in force.
V skladu z ugotovitvijo, da SZP ni bil vpleten v izogibanje ukrepom, je treba družbo izvzeti iz veljavnih protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov.
The registration of imports of PET film consigned from Israel by SZP, as imposed by the initiating Regulation, should cease.
Treba je prenehati registracijo uvoza folije iz PET, ki jo iz Izraela pošilja SZP, in je bila uvedena z začetno uredbo.
In accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, which provides that measures shall be applied against registered imports from the date of registration, and in view of the exemption of the company from measures, no anti-dumping duty should be collected on imports of PET film consigned from Israel by SZP which entered the Union under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation.
V skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne protidampinške uredbe, ki določa uporabo ukrepov proti registriranemu uvozu od datuma registracije, in zaradi izvzetja družbe iz ukrepov se za uvoz folije iz PET, ki jo iz Izraela pošilja SZP in je uvožena na ozemlje Unije na podlagi registracije, uvedene z začetno uredbo, protidampinška dajatev ne sme pobirati.
In relation to the countervailing measures, as SZP has been found not to be circumventing the measures in force, the exemption should take effect from the date of entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 6/2010 in accordance with Article 23(6) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da se družba ne izogiba veljavnim ukrepom, mora izvzetje iz izravnalnih ukrepov začeti veljati z datumom začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 6/2010 v skladu s členom 23(6) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
Repayment or remission must be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with applicable customs legislation.
Povračilo ali odpust morajo zahtevati nacionalni carinski organi v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo.
The exemption from the extended measures granted to PET film produced by SZP shall, in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 23(6) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, remain valid on condition that the facts as finally ascertained justify the exemption and that it is, for instance, not established that the exemption was granted on the basis of false or misleading information submitted by the company concerned.
Izvzetje iz razširjenih ukrepov, odobreno za folijo iz PET, ki jo proizvaja SZP, bo v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 23(6) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ostalo veljavno, če dokončno preverjeni podatki upravičujejo izvzetje in na primer ni bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo izvzetje odobreno na podlagi lažnih ali zavajajočih podatkov, ki jih je predložila zadevna družba.
Should prima facie evidence indicate otherwise, an investigation may be initiated by the Commission to establish if withdrawal of the exemption is warranted.
Če bi prima facie dokazi kazali drugače, lahko Komisija začne preiskavo, s katero bi utemeljila upravičenost preklica izvzetja.
The exemption from the extended measures of imports of PET film from SZP was established on the basis of the findings of the present review.
Izvzetje iz razširjenih ukrepov na uvoz folije iz PET, ki jo proizvaja SZP, je bilo ugotovljeno na podlagi ugotovitev sedanjega pregleda.
This exemption is thus exclusively applicable to imports of PET film consigned from Israel and produced by that specific legal entity.
To izvzetje se torej uporablja izključno za uvoz folije iz PET, ki jo iz Izraela pošlje in jo proizvaja ta določeni pravni subjekt.
Imported PET film produced or consigned by any company not specifically mentioned in Article 2(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 and Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from the exemption and should be subject to the residual duty rate as imposed by those Regulations.
Za uvoženo folijo iz PET, ki jo proizvaja ali pošilja katera koli družba, ki ni posebej navedena v členu 2(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1292/2007 in členu 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2006 s svojim imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s posebej navedenimi subjekti, se izvzetje ne more uporabljati, velja pa stopnja preostale dajatve, uvedene z navedenima uredbama.
SZP and all other interested parties were informed of the facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to grant an exemption to SZP from the extended measures.
SZP in vse ostale zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o dejstvih in premislekih v zvezi z odobritvijo izvzetja iz razširjenih ukrepov za SZP.
Regulation (EC) No 1292/2007 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1292/2007 se spremeni kot sledi:
in Article 2(4), the following company is added to the list of companies that produce polyethylene terephthalate film in Brazil and Israel and whose imports of polyethylene terephthalate film are exempted from the application of the extended definitive residual anti-dumping duty:
v členu 2(4) se na seznam družb, ki proizvajajo folijo iz polietilen tereftalata v Braziliji in Izraelu ter katerih uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata je izvzet iz uporabe razširjene dokončne preostale protidampinške dajatve, doda naslednja družba:
(TARIC additional code A964)’.
(dodatna oznaka TARIC A964)“.
Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006 se spremeni kot sledi:
in Article 1(3), the following company is added to the list of companies that produce polyethylene terephthalate film in Brazil and Israel and whose imports of polyethylene terephthalate film are exempted from the application of the extended definitive countervailing duty:
v členu 1(3) se na seznam družb, ki proizvajajo folijo iz polietilen tereftalata v Braziliji in Izraelu ter katerih uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata je izvzet iz uporabe razširjene dokončne izravnalne dajatve, doda naslednja družba:
Countervailing duties which have been levied after 7 January 2010 under Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 on imports from S.Z.P.
Izravnalne dajatve, ki so bile v skladu s členom 1(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 367/2006 zaračunane po 7. januarju 2010 na uvoze S.Z.P.
Plastic Packaging Products Ltd shall be reimbursed to the importer or importers concerned.
Plastic Packaging Products Ltd se povrnejo zadevnemu uvozniku ali uvoznikom.
Repayment or remission shall be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with applicable customs legislation.
Povračilo ali odpust zahtevajo nacionalni carinski organi v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports carried out pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 6/2010.
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza, ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 6/2010.
No anti-dumping duty shall be collected on the imports thus registered.
Za tako registriran uvoz se ne pobira protidampinška dajatev.
Article 1(2) shall apply from 7 January 2010.
Člen 1(2) se uporablja od 7. januarja 2010.