natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See, as regards the principles, Joined Cases T-132/96 and T-143/96 Freistaat Sachsen and Volkswagen AG v Commission [1999] ECR II-3663, paragraph 167, followed in Commission Decision of 20 May 1998 in Case C 47/96, Crédit Lyonnais (OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, p. 28, paragraph 10.1), Commission Decision of 18 February 2004 in Case C 28/02 Bankgesellschaft Berlin (OJ L 116, 4.5.2005, p. 1, recital 153 et seq) and Commission Decision of 27 June 2007 in Case C 50/06 BAWAG (OJ L 83, 26.3.2008, p. 7, recital 166).
V zvezi z načeli glej združeni zadevi T-132/96 in T-143/96 Freistaat Sachsen in Volkswagen AG proti Komisiji (Recueil 1999, str. II-3663, točka 167), ki jima sledi Odločba Komisije z dne 20. maja 1998 v zadevi C 47/1996, Crédit Lyonnais (UL L 221, 8.8.1998, str. 28, odstavek 10.1), Odločba Komisije z dne 18. februarja 2004 v zadevi C 28/2002 Bankgesellschaft Berlin (UL L 116, 4.5.2005, str. 1, uvodna izjava 153 in naslednje uvodne izjave) in Odločba Komisije z dne 27. junija 2007 v zadevi C 50/06 BAWAG (UL L 83, 26.3.2008, str. 7, uvodna izjava 166).
See also Commission Decision of 5 December 2007 in Case NN 70/07, Northern Rock (OJ C 43, 16.2.2008, p. 1), Commission Decision of 30 April 2008 in Case NN 25/08 Rescue aid to WestLB (OJ C 189, 26.7.2008, p. 3) and Commission Decision of 4 June 2008 in Case C 9/08 SachsenLB (OJ L 104, 24.4.2009, p. 34).
Glej tudi Odločbo Komisije z dne 5. decembra 2007 v zadevi NN 70/07, Northern Rock (UL C 43, 16.2.2008, str. 1), Odločbo Komisije z dne 30. aprila 2008 v zadevi NN 25/08 Pomoč za reševanje WestLB (UL C 189, 26.7.2008, str. 3) in Odločbo Komisije z dne 4. junija 2008 v zadevi C 9/08 SachsenLB (UL L 104, 24.4.2009, str. 34).
Communication on the application of State aid rules to measures taken in relation to financial institutions in the context of the current global financial crisis (OJ C 270, 25.10.2008, p. 8).
Sporočilo o uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za ukrepe v zvezi s finančnimi institucijami v okviru trenutne svetovne finančne krize (UL C 270, 25.10.2008, str. 8).
Communication from the Commission – The recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis: limitation of aid to the minimum necessary and safeguards against undue distortions of competition (OJ C 10, 15.1.2009, p. 2).
Sporočilo Komisije – Dokapitalizacija finančnih institucij v trenutni finančni krizi: omejitev pomoči na najmanjšo potrebno in zaščitni ukrepi za preprečevanje neupravičenega izkrivljanja konkurence (UL C 10, 15.1.2009, str. 2).
See the approval of the Recapitalisation scheme of credit institutions in Portugal, Commission Decision of 20 May 2009 in Case N 556/08 (OJ C 152, 7.7.2009, p. 4, in particular recitals 65 to 67) and its extension in Commission Decision of 17 March 2010, in Case N 80/10 (OJ C 119, 7.5.2010, p. 2).
Glej odobritev Sheme dokapitalizacije kreditnih institucij na Portugalskem, Odločba Komisije z dne 20. maja 2009 v zadevi N 556/08 (UL C 152, 7.7.2009, str. 4, zlasti uvodne izjave 65 do 67) in njeno podaljšanje v Odločbi Komisije z dne 17. marca 2010, v zadevi N 80/10 (UL C 119, 7.5.2010, str. 2).
See pages 8 and 13 of the reply of 15 June 2010.
Glej strani 8 in 13 odgovora z dne 15. junija 2010.
OJ C 155, 20.6.2008.
UL C 155, 20.6.2008, str. 10.
See page 8 of the reply of the Portuguese authorities of 15 June 2010.
Glej stran 8 odgovora portugalskih organov z dne 15. junija 2010.
See page 13.
Glej stran 13.
On 13 March 2009 the Commission approved by decision (‘the Rescue Aid Decision’) [2] a State guarantee underwriting a EUR 450 million loan granted to BPP by six Portuguese banks on 5 December 2008.
Komisija je 13. marca 2009 z odločbo („Odločba o pomoči za reševanje“) [2] odobrila državno garancijo, s katero se je prevzelo posojilo v višini 450 milijonov EUR, ki ga je šest portugalskih bank 5. decembra 2008 odobrilo banki BPP.
The measure was authorised for a period of 6 months on the basis of Article 87(3)(b) of the EC Treaty (now Article 107(3)(b) TFEU), on the assumption that the Portuguese authorities would implement their commitment to submit a restructuring plan within 6 months (i.e. by 5 June 2009).
Ukrep je bil odobren na podlagi člena 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES (sedaj člen 107(3)(b) PDEU) za šestmesečno obdobje ob predpostavki, da bodo portugalski organi izpolnili svojo zavezo, da v šestih mesecih (t. j. do 5. junija 2009) predložijo načrt za prestrukturiranje.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 6 March 2010 [4].
Odločitev Komisije, da bo sprožila formalni postopek preiskave, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije dne 6. marca 2010 [4].
The comments from interested parties were transmitted to Portugal by letter of 15 April 2010.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so bile Portugalski posredovane z dopisom z dne 15. aprila 2010.
Portugal replied to these comments by letter dated 13 May 2010, registered on 14 May 2010.
Portugalska je na te pripombe odgovorila z dopisom z dne 13. maja 2010, ki je bil evidentiran 14. maja 2010.
The Commission requested further information on 29 April 2010, which Portugal submitted by letter dated 13 May 2010.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 29. aprila 2010 zahtevala dodatne informacije, ki jih je Portugalska posredovala z dopisom z dne 13. maja 2010.
Portugal provided further information on 15 and 21 June 2010.
Portugalska je posredovala dodatne informacije 15. in 21. junija 2010.
The State guarantee that accompanied the loan was granted in accordance with Law No 112/97, i.e. outside the Portuguese guarantee scheme (Law 60-A/2008) which had been approved by the Commission on 29 October 2008 [5].
Državna garancija, ki je spremljala posojilo, je bila odobrena v skladu z Zakonom št. 112/97, t. j. zunaj portugalske garancijske sheme (Zakon 60-A/2008), ki jo je Komisija odobrila 29. oktobra 2008 [5].
In particular, the Portuguese authorities stated that the general guarantee scheme, which is limited to solvent banks, would be an inappropriate framework for the State intervention in favour of BPP, given the increasing financial deterioration of the bank and the specific risks linked to this transaction.
Zlasti so portugalski organi navedli, da bi bila splošna garancijska shema, ki je omejena na solventne banke, zaradi finančnega slabšanja banke in posebnih tveganj, povezanih s to transakcijo, neprimeren okvir za posredovanje države v korist banke BPP.
In its decision of 13 March 2009 the Commission approved the measure for a period of 6 months from the granting of the State guarantee, i.e. until 5 June 2009.
Komisija je v svoji odločbi z dne 13. marca 2009 odobrila ukrep za obdobje šestih mesecev od odobritve državne garancije, t. j. do 5. junija 2009.
The Commission also considered the submission of the restructuring plan by 5 June 2009 as necessary given the exceptionally low level of remuneration.
Komisija je menila, da je treba zaradi izredno nizke ravni povračila do 5. junija 2009 predložiti načrt za prestrukturiranje.
In this regard, the Rescue Aid Decision already stated that the fee of 20 basis points was well below the level resulting from the application of the European Central Bank’s recommendation of 20 October 2008.
V tej zvezi je v Odločbi o pomoči za reševanje že navedeno, da je bila pristojbina v višini 20 baznih točk bistveno nižja od ravni, ki je rezultat uporabe priporočila Evropske centralne banke z dne 20. oktobra 2008.
Despite the high level of collateralisation, the Commission concluded that the remuneration for the State guarantee was considerable lower than would generally be considered as adequate for distressed banks.
Kljub visoki ravni zavarovanja je Komisija ugotovila, da je bilo povračilo za državno garancijo znatno nižje, kot bi se na splošno štelo za ustrezno za banke v težavah.
On 13 May 2010 the Portuguese authorities communicated to the Commission that, on the basis of the loan agreement [9], the guarantee had been called in by the bank syndicate and had been executed on 7 May, when Portugal had reimbursed EUR 450 million to the six banks. The Portuguese State stated that it had already taken the necessary steps to enforce its privileged and priority rights as creditor over the collateral relating to the guarantee, having presented its claims to the relevant court [10].
Portugalski organi so 13. maja 2010 Komisiji sporočili, da je bančni konzorcij na podlagi posojilne pogodbe [9] unovčil garancijo, kar je bilo izvršeno 7. maja, ko je Portugalska šestim bankam povrnila 450 milijonov EUR. Portugalska država je navedla, da je že sprejela ukrepe, ki so potrebni za izvajanje njenih privilegiranih in prednostnih pravic kot upnika zavarovanja, ki se nanaša na garancijo, in je na ustreznem sodišču že predstavila svoje zahtevke [10].
Thus the measure, with or without the extensions, did not ‘grant an economic advantage to BPP or strengthen its position in relation to its competitors for the simple reason that BPP was not operating on the market and, consequently, was not in competition with other banks’ [14]. Portugal therefore considers that the measure affected neither competition nor trade among Member States.
Zato ta ukrep, s podaljšanji ali brez njih, „banki BPP ni zagotovil gospodarske prednosti ali okrepil njenega položaja v primerjavi s konkurenčnimi ponudniki iz preprostega razloga, da banka BPP ni poslovala na trgu in zato ni konkurirala drugim bankam.“ [14] Portugalska zato meni, da ukrep ni vplival niti na konkurenco niti na trgovino med državami članicami.
establishing the financial contribution by the Union for the implementation of an epidemiological survey and bluetongue surveillance measures in the context of the emergency measures taken to combat this disease in the Netherlands in 2006 and 2007
o določitvi finančnega prispevka Unije za izvajanje epidemiološkega nadzora in nadzornih ukrepov glede bolezni modrikastega jezika v okviru izrednih ukrepov, sprejetih v boju proti tej bolezni v letih 2006 in 2007 na Nizozemskem
Having regard to Council Decision 2009/470/EC of 25 May 2009 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 3(4) and 3(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2009/470/ES z dne 25. maja 2009 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1] in zlasti člena 3(4) in (6) Odločbe,
In accordance with Article 75 of the Financial Regulation and Article 90(1) of the Implementing Rules, the commitment of expenditure from the Union budget shall be preceded by a financing decision setting out the essential elements of the action involving expenditure and adopted by the institution or the authorities to which powers have been delegated by the institution.
V skladu s členom 75 finančne uredbe in členom 90(1) izvedbenih pravil morajo institucija ali organi, na katere je ta institucija prenesla pooblastila, pred odobritvijo izdatka iz proračuna Unije sprejeti sklep o financiranju, ki določa bistvene elemente ukrepa, ki zahteva izdatke.
With a view to helping to eradicate bluetongue as rapidly as possible the Union should contribute financially to eligible expenditure borne by the Member States.
Unija mora finančno prispevati k upravičenim izdatkom držav članic, da pomaga pri izkoreninjenju bolezni modrikastega jezika v najkrajšem možnem času.
Article 3(6) first indent of that Decision lays down rules on the percentage that must be applied to the costs incurred by the Member States.
Prva alinea člena 3(6) navedene odločbe določa pravila o deležu, ki se uporablja za stroške držav članic.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 349/2005 [2] lays down rules on the Community financing of emergency measures and of the campaign to combat certain animal diseases under Council Decision 90/424/EEC.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 349/2005 [2] določa pravila v zvezi s financiranjem Skupnosti nujnih ukrepov in ukrepov za boj proti nekaterim živalskim boleznim iz Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS.
Article 3 of that Regulation lays down rules on the expenditure eligible for Union financial support.
Člen 3 navedene uredbe določa pravila o izdatkih, upravičenih do finančne podpore Unije.
Commission Decision 2007/20/EC [3] on a financial contribution by the Community towards the eradication of bluetongue in the Netherlands in 2006 and 2007 granted a financial contribution from the Union to the Netherlands towards the costs incurred for the implementation of an epidemiological survey and bluetongue surveillance.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2007/20/ES [3] o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za izkoreninjenje bolezni modrikastega jezika na Nizozemskem v letih 2006 in 2007 se je odobril finančni prispevek Unije za Nizozemsko k izdatkom, povezanim z izvajanjem epidemiološkega nadzora in nadzornih ukrepov glede bolezni modrikastega jezika.
In accordance with that Decision, a first tranche of EUR 4675 was paid.
V skladu z navedeno odločbo je bila odobrena prva tranša v višini 4675 EUR.
On 29 April 2008, the Netherlands submitted an official request for reimbursement as set out in Article 7(1) and 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Nizozemska je 29. aprila 2008 predložila uradni zahtevek za povračilo iz člena 7(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
The Commission’s observations, method of calculating the eligible expenditure and final conclusions were communicated to the Netherlands by e-mail dated 19 October 2010.
Pripombe Komisije, metoda izračuna upravičenih izdatkov in končne ugotovitve so bili Nizozemski sporočeni po elektronski pošti dne 19. oktobra 2010.
The payment of the financial contribution from the Union must be subject to the condition that the planned activities were actually implemented and that the authorities provided all the necessary information within the set deadlines.
Plačilo finančnega prispevka Unije se izvede pod pogojem, da so se načrtovani ukrepi dejansko že izvedli in da so pristojni organi zagotovili vse potrebne informacije v določenih rokih.
The Dutch authorities have fully complied with their technical and administrative obligations as set out in Article 3(4) of Decision 2009/470/EC and Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 349/2005.
Nizozemski organi so v celoti izpolnili tehnične in upravne obveznosti iz člena 3(4) Odločbe 2009/470/EGS in člena 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 349/2005.
In view of the above considerations, the total amount of the financial support from the Union to the eligible expenditure incurred associated with the eradication of bluetongue in the Netherlands in 2006 and 2007 should now be fixed.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je treba zdaj določiti celotni znesek finančnega prispevka Unije k upravičenim stroškom, ki so povezani z izkoreninjenjem bolezni modrikastega jezika na Nizozemskem v letih 2006 in 2007.
The financial contribution from the Union towards the expenditure associated with eradicating bluetongue in the Netherlands in 2006 and 2007 is fixed at EUR 207931,25. It constitutes a financing decision in the meaning of Article 75 of the Financial Regulation.
Finančni prispevek Unije za izdatke, povezane z izkoreninjenjem bolezni modrikastega jezika na Nizozemskem v letih 2006 in 2007 se določi v višini 207931,25 EUR. Ta finančni prispevek predstavlja sklep o financiranju v smislu člena 75 finančne uredbe.
The balance of the financial contribution is fixed at EUR 203256,25.
Preostali znesek finančnega prispevka se določi v višini 203256,25 EUR.
OJ L 7, 12.1.2007, p. 41.
UL L 7, 12.1.2007, str. 41.
on the application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in the Principality of Liechtenstein
o uporabi določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na schengenski informacijski sistem, v Kneževini Lihtenštajn
Having regard to the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (the Protocol) [1], which was signed on 28 February 2008 [2] and entered into force on 7 April 2011, and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Protokola med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol), ki je bil podpisan 28. februarja 2008 [2] in je začel veljati 7. aprila 2011, ter zlasti člena 10(1) Protokola,
Article 10(1) of the Protocol provides that the provisions of the Schengen acquis shall be put into effect by the Principality of Liechtenstein only pursuant to a Council decision to that effect after verification that the necessary conditions for the implementation of that acquis have been fulfilled by the Principality of Liechtenstein.
Člen 10(1) Protokola določa, da začne Kneževina Lihtenštajn uporabljati določbe schengenskega pravnega reda šele v skladu s sklepom Sveta, ki se sprejme v ta namen, potem ko se je Svet prepričal, da je Kneževina Lihtenštajn izpolnila vse potrebne pogoje za izvajanje tega pravnega reda.
The Council has verified that the Principality of Liechtenstein ensures satisfactory levels of data protection by taking the following steps: a full questionnaire was forwarded to the Principality of Liechtenstein, whose replies were recorded, and verification and evaluation visits were made to the Principality of Liechtenstein, in accordance with the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures as set out in the Decision of the Executive Committee of 16 September 1998 setting up a Standing Committee on the evaluation and implementation of Schengen (SCH/Com-ex (98) 26 def.) [3] (the Decision of the Executive Committee of 16 September 1998), in the area of Data Protection.
Svet je na naslednji način preveril, ali Kneževina Lihtenštajn zagotavlja zadovoljivo raven varstva podatkov: Kneževini Lihtenštajn je bil poslan obsežen vprašalnik, prejeti odgovori pa so bili zabeleženi in opravljani so bili preveritveni in evalvacijski obiski v Kneževini Lihtenštajn v skladu z veljavnimi schengenskimi postopki evalvacije, kakor so določeni v Sklepu Izvršnega odbora z dne 16. septembra 1998 o ustanovitvi stalnega odbora Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma (SCH/Com-ex (98) 26 def.) [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sklep Izvršnega odbora z dne 16. septembra 1998) na področju varstva podatkov.
On 9 June 2011, the Council concluded that the Principality of Liechtenstein had fulfilled the conditions in the area of Data Protection.
Svet je 9. junija 2011 zaključil, da je Kneževina Lihtenštajn izpolnila pogoje na področju varovanja podatkov.
It is therefore possible to set a date from which the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System (SIS) may apply to the Principality of Liechtenstein.
Zato je mogoče določiti datum, s katerim se schengenski pravni red, ki se navezuje na schengenski informacijski sistem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SIS), lahko začne uporabljati za Kneževino Lihtenštajn.
The entry into force of this Decision should allow for real SIS data to be transferred to the Principality of Liechtenstein.
Začetek veljavnosti tega sklepa bi moral omogočiti, da se Kneževini Lihtenštajn pošiljajo pravi podatki SIS.
The concrete use of these data should allow the Council, through the applicable Schengen evaluation procedures as set out in the Decision of the Executive Committee of 16 September 1998, to verify the correct application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS in the Principality of Liechtenstein.
Konkretna uporaba teh podatkov bi morala Svetu omogočiti, da v Kneževini Lihtenštajn z veljavnimi schengenskimi postopki evalvacije, kakor so določeni v Sklepu Izvršnega odbora z dne 16. septembra 1998, preveri pravilno uporabo določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki se navezujejo na SIS.
Once those evaluations have been carried out, the Council should decide on the lifting of checks at internal borders with the Principality of Liechtenstein.
Ko bo ta evalvacija opravljena, bi moral Svet odločiti o odpravi kontrol na notranjih mejah s Kneževino Lihtenštajn.
The Agreement between the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis and concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in Liechtenstein, Iceland or Norway stipulates that it shall be put into effect in respect of the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis on the same date as the Protocol is put into effect.
Sporazum med Kneževino Lihtenštajn, Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško o izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda ter kriterijih in mehanizmih za določitev države, odgovorne za obravnavo prošnje za azil, vložene v Lihtenštajnu, na Islandiji ali Norveškem, določa, da bo navedeni sporazum za področja izvajanja, uporabe in razvoja schengenskega pravnega reda začel učinkovati na isti dan, kot začne učinkovati Protokol.
A separate Council Decision should be adopted setting a date for the lifting of checks at internal borders.
Treba bi bilo sprejeti ločeni sklep Sveta, s katerim bi določili datum za odpravo kontrol oseb na notranjih mejah.
Until the date set out in that Decision, certain restrictions on the use of the SIS should be imposed,
Do datuma, določenega v takšnem sklepu, bi bilo treba uvesti nekatere omejitve glede uporabe SIS –
From 19 July 2011, the provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the SIS, as referred to in Annex I, shall apply to the Principality of Liechtenstein in its relations with the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden.
Določbe schengenskega pravnega reda iz Priloge I, ki se navezujejo na SIS, se od 19. julija 2011 uporabljajo za Kneževino Lihtenštajn v njenih odnosih s Kraljevino Belgijo, Republiko Bolgarijo, Češko republiko, Kraljevino Dansko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Republiko Estonijo, Helensko republiko, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Republiko Latvijo, Republiko Litvo, Velikim vojvodstvom Luksemburg, Republiko Madžarsko, Malto, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Republiko Avstrijo, Republiko Poljsko, Portugalsko republiko, Romunijo, Republiko Slovenijo, Slovaško republiko, Republiko Finsko in Kraljevino Švedsko.