natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This will be performed by an ad-hoc sub-committee: the ‘Security Scrutiny Committee’.
Ta postopek opravi začasni pododbor: „odbor za podrobni varnostni pregled“.
This ‘Security Scrutiny Committee’ is composed by Member States representatives nominated in close liaison with the competent national security authorities, supported if appropriate by representatives of the relevant Programme Committee(s), in a configuration representing the countries of the proposal applicants.
„Odbor za podrobni varnostni pregled“ sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, ki se imenujejo v tesni povezavi s pristojnimi nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi, če je to ustrezno, pa ga podpira ustrezni programski odbor ali odbori v taki sestavi, da so zastopane države vlagateljev predlogov.
This Committee is chaired by a representative of the Commission.
Temu odboru predseduje predstavnik Komisije.
This Committee will verify if all security aspects are properly taken into account by the applicants.
Ta odbor preveri, ali so vlagatelji ustrezno upoštevali vse varnostne vidike.
Proposals will be scrutinised by Committee members from the same countries as the proposal applicants.
Predloge podrobno pregledajo člani odbora, ki so iz istih držav kot vlagatelji predloga.
This process should reach a common position between the concerned national representatives resulting in one of the following recommendations:
S tem postopkom se doseže skupno stališče zadevnih nacionalnih predstavnikov, kar lahko vodi do enega od naslednjih priporočil:
Classification is not required: Procedures for preparation of the ERC grant agreements can be started (though some recommendations for preparation may be issued, if relevant),
določitev stopnje ni potrebna: postopki za sestavljanje sporazumov ERC o dodelitvi sredstev se lahko začnejo (čeprav se lahko predložijo nekatera priporočila za pripravo, če je to ustrezno),
Classification is required: specific recommendations for the preparation of the ERC grant agreement are given in the form of conditions to be met in the grant agreement.
določitev stopnje je potrebna: predložena so posebna priporočila za pripravo sporazuma ERC o dodelitvi sredstev v obliki pogojev, ki jih mora sporazum o dodelitvi sredstev izpolnjevati.
The ERC action will become a Classified Action [49] and will be EU-classified at the level of the highest classification of the information used/produced by the ERC action as indicated in the SAL and its annexed SCG,
Ukrep ERC postane tajni ukrep [49] in ga EU označi za tajnega na najvišji stopnji tajnosti informacij, ki se uporabijo v ukrepu ERC/pridobljenih z ukrepom ERC, kot je to navedeno v LVV in priloženem VST,
The proposal is too sensitive to be financed because the applicants do not have the appropriate experience, skills or permissions to handle properly the classified information.
predlog je preveč občutljiv za dodelitev sredstev, ker vlagatelji nimajo ustreznih izkušenj, veščin ali dovoljenj za pravilno ravnanje s tajnimi podatki.
In that case, the proposal may be rejected.
V takem primeru se sme predlog zavrniti.
If so, the ERCEA will explain the reasons of rejection, except when these reasons are themselves classified.
V tem primeru ERCEA navede razloge za zavrnitev, razen če so sami razlogi tajni.
Based on this common position, the level of classification will be determined.
Na podlagi tega skupnega stališča se določi stopnja tajnosti.
As a result, the ERCEA, together with all the relevant NSAs, will then verify, during preparation and implementation of the grant agreement, that all the necessary procedures and actions are put in place in order to guarantee that classified information is dealt with in the appropriate way.
Zaradi tega ERCEA skupaj z vsemi ustreznimi nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi nato med pripravo in izvajanjem sporazuma o dodelitvi sredstev preveri, ali so vzpostavljeni vsi potrebni postopki in ukrepi za zagotovitev, da se s tajnimi podatki ravna ustrezno.
Export & Transfer Licences
Dovoljenja za izvoz in prenos
In addition, a proposal may also be considered as sensitive, independently of any security classification, if it plans to exchange material subject to transfer or export licensing.
Predlog se lahko ne glede na stopnjo tajnosti šteje za občutljivega tudi, če se namerava izmenjati material, za katerega je potrebno dovoljenje za prenos ali izvozno dovoljenje.
In that context, applicants must comply with national laws and EU regulation [50].
V zvezi s tem morajo vlagatelji upoštevati nacionalno zakonodajo in uredbo EU [50].
If export licences (or intra EU licences) are required for carrying the planned work, applicants must clarify the requirement to have such export or transfer licences and must provide a copy of export or transfer licences (or of the requests).(E) International cooperation
Če se za izvedbo načrtovanega dela zahtevajo izvozna dovoljenja (ali dovoljenja za prenos znotraj EU), morajo vlagatelji pojasniti zahteve za pridobitev takega izvoznega dovoljenja ali dovoljenja za prenos in priložiti kopijo izvoznega dovoljenja ali dovoljenja za prenos (oziroma vloge za pridobitev dovoljenja).(E) Mednarodno sodelovanje
Security concerns can not be invoked as a reason for the rejection of proposals for non-classified ERC actions that entail the participation of entities from a third country [51].
Varnostnih vprašanj ni mogoče uporabiti kot razlog za zavrnitev predlogov za netajne ukrepe ERC, ki vključujejo sodelovanje subjektov iz tretjih držav [51].
The only exceptions to this will occur if: The topic was described in the work programme as not open to international cooperation: in that case any proposal containing international cooperation will be declared as ineligible,
Do izjeme pri tem pride samo, če: je bila v delovnem programu tema opisana kot tema, pri kateri mednarodno sodelovanje ni mogoče: v tem primeru se razglasi, da predlog, ki vsebuje mednarodno sodelovanje, ne izpolnjuje pogojev;
The ‘security considerations’ flag has been raised, in which case the proposal will be scrutinised according to the procedure described above,
je bila predlogu dodeljena oznaka „varnostna vprašanja“; v tem primeru se predlog podrobno prouči v skladu s prej opisanim postopkom.
OJ L 9, 12.1.2008, p. 15.
UL L 9, 12.1.2008, str. 15.
With the possible exception of coordination and support actions referred to in Article 14 of the Rules for Participation.
Morebitna izjema so usklajevalni in podporni ukrepi iz člena 14 Pravil za sodelovanje.
Exceptionally, the PI may himself/herself act as the applicant legal entity.
Izjemoma lahko glavni raziskovalec sam deluje kot pravna oseba vlagateljica.
The operator of the electronic submission may contact the proposer to clarify or resolve technical problems related to the submission.
Upravljavec elektronskega sistema za oddajo lahko vzpostavi stik s predlagateljem, da pojasni ali razreši tehnične težave pri oddaji.
The completeness of the information contained in the proposal will be for the independent experts to evaluate.
Popolnost informacij, ki jih vsebuje predlog, ocenijo neodvisni strokovnjaki.
The eligibility checks only concern the presence of the appropriate parts and forms of the proposal and the validity of the requested supplementary documents.
Ko se preverja ustreznost, se upošteva samo obstoj ustreznih delov in obrazcev predloga ter veljavnost zahtevanih dodatnih dokumentov.
Proposals are normally evaluated against the criteria for the funding scheme for which they are submitted.
Predlogi se ponavadi ocenjujejo na podlagi meril za shemo financiranja, za katero so oddani.
However, for instance in cases where the funding scheme was chosen erroneously the ERCEA may decide to evaluate a proposal against the criteria of a different funding scheme.
Vendar pa se ERCEA lahko odloči, da predlog oceni na podlagi meril za drugo shemo financiranja, na primer, ko je bila shema financiranja napačno izbrana.
This may only be done if it is clear that the proposal does not correspond, or corresponds poorly, to the originally chosen funding scheme, and if a more appropriate funding scheme is open in the call in question.
To je dovoljeno samo, če je očitno, da predlog ne ustreza ali slabo ustreza prvotno izbrani shemi financiranja, in če je v zadevnem razpisu na voljo primernejša shema financiranja.
This committee is composed of ERCEA staff, and where necessary other Commission staff having the requisite expertise in legal matters and/or information systems.
Ta odbor sestavlja osebje ERCEA, in kadar je to potrebno, drugo osebje Komisije, ki ima potrebno strokovno znanje s področja prava in/ali informacijskih sistemov.
It examines the proposal and the circumstances surrounding its submission and provides specialist advice to support the decision on whether or not to reject the proposal on eligibility grounds.
Preučuje predlog in okoliščine v zvezi z njegovo oddajo ter predloži strokovne nasvete, da podpre odločitev o tem, ali se naj predlog zavrne na podlagi neustreznosti ali ne.
The committee may decide to contact the PI and the applicant legal entity in order to clarify a particular issue.
Odbor se lahko odloči vzpostaviti stik z glavnim raziskovalcem in pravno osebo vlagateljico, da pojasni določeno vprašanje.
Staff from relevant specialised EU agencies are regarded as external experts.
Osebje iz ustreznih specializiranih agencij EU se šteje za zunanje strokovnjake.
Article 17(2) of the Rules for Participation.
Člen 17(2) Pravil za sodelovanje.
The selection by the Scientific Council may not necessarily be required for the appointment of peer reviewers of coordination and support actions.
Od znanstvenega odbora se ne zahteva nujno, da imenuje strokovne ocenjevalce za usklajevalne in podporne ukrepe.
According to the Rules for Participation and/or Commission Decision C(2008) 5694 of 8 October 2008 delegating powers to the ERCEA.
V skladu s Pravili za sodelovanje in/ali z Odločbo Komisije C(2008) 5694 z dne 8. oktobra 2008 o prenosu pooblastil na izvajalsko agencijo Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta.
The European Union pursues a gender balance and equal opportunities policy in the field of research.
Evropska unija zagovarja uravnoteženo zastopanost spolov in politiko enakih možnosti na področju raziskav.
To that extent, Commission Decision 2000/407/EC of 19 June 2000‘on gender balance within the committees and experts groups established by it’.
V ta namen je bil sprejet Sklep Komisije 2000/407/ES z dne 19. junija 2000 o uravnoteženi zastopanosti obeh spolov v odborih in strokovnih skupinah, ki jih ustanovi Komisija.
In the same context, Article 17(2) of the Rules for Participation provides that ‘appropriate measures shall be taken to ensure reasonable gender balance when appointing groups of independent experts’.
Člen 17(2) Pravil za sodelovanje določa tudi, da „se sprejmejo ustrezni ukrepi za zagotovitev primerne zastopanosti obeh spolov pri imenovanju skupin neodvisnih strokovnjakov“.
The relevant Guide for Applicants could allow for up to a maximum of three people who may be indicated by the applicant.
Ustrezni priročnik za vlagatelje lahko dovoljuje, da lahko vlagatelj navede do največ tri osebe.
Reasons have to be based on clear grounds such as direct scientific rivalry, professional hostility, or similar situation which would impair or put in doubt the objectivity of the potential evaluator.
Razlogi morajo biti jasno utemeljeni, na primer neposredno rivalstvo med znanstveniki, poklicna sovražnost ali podobne okoliščine, ki bi lahko vplivale na objektivnost ocenjevalca ali povzročile dvom o njej.
Article 15 Rules for participation.
Člen 15 Pravil za sodelovanje.
In accordance with Article 16.1 of the Rules for Participation.
V skladu s členom 16.1 Pravil za sodelovanje.
This may include members of Panels other than the Panel(s) to which the proposal is assigned or referees.
To lahko vključuje člane vseh odborov, razen odbora ali odborov, ki jim je bil predlog dodeljen, ter izvedence.
This includes cross-panel or cross-domain interdisciplinary proposals which may be assigned for review to members of more than one Panel or additional referees.
To vključuje interdisciplinarne predloge, ki pokrivajo več odborov in več področij ter ki jih je mogoče dodeliti v pregled članom več kot enega odbora ali dodatnim izvedencem.
Article 15.2 of the Rules for Participation.
Člen 15.2 Pravil za sodelovanje.
‘Irregularity’ in the sense of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 ( OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1).
„Nepravilnost“ v smislu Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 ( UL L 312, 23.12.1995, str. 1.).
The redress procedure does not replace the normal channels applying to all ERCEA and Commission actions, such as: the Secretariat-General of the Commission for breach of the code of good administration (relations with the public); the European Ombudsman for ‘maladministration’; the Court of Justice of the European Union for a decision affecting a person or legal entity.
Postopek za pritožbe ne nadomešča običajnih poti, ki se uporabljajo za vse ukrepe ERCEA in Komisije, kot so na primer: Generalni sekretariat Komisije za kršenje kodeksa dobrega upravljanja (odnosi z javnostjo); Evropski varuh človekovih pravic za „nepravilnosti pri upravljanju“; Sodišče Evropske unije za odločitve, ki vplivajo na osebo ali pravno osebo.
On the basis of the final list drawn by the ERCEA in accordance with section 3.1.7.
Na podlagi končnega seznama, ki ga je ERCEA sestavila v skladu s poglavjem 3.1.7.
This may include the names of PIs and applicant legal entities, the proposal title and acronym.
To lahko vključuje imena glavnih raziskovalcev in pravnih oseb vlagateljic ter naslov in kratico predloga.
Contractors and/or beneficiaries of Coordination and Support Actions.
Pogodbeniki in/ali upravičenci usklajevalnih in podpornih ukrepov.
The PIs and/or the host institutions.
Glavni raziskovalci in/ali ustanove gostiteljice.
Including, if necessary, the completion of the procedure for consulting the programme committee provided for in the Ideas Specific Programme.
Vključno z izvedbo postopka za posvetovanje s programskim odborom, ki je določen v posebnem programu „Zamisli“, če je to potrebno.
According to Article 16.4 of the Rules for Participation, and the Commission rules on the verification of the existence and legal status of participants, as well as their operational and financial capacities in indirect actions supported through the form of a grant under FP7, C(2007) 2466.
V skladu s členom 16.4 Pravil za sodelovanje in pravil Komisije o preverjanju obstoja in pravnega statusa udeležencev ter njihovih operativnih in finančnih zmožnosti v posrednih ukrepih, podprtih z dodelitvijo sredstev v okviru OP7, C(2007) 2466.
The additional conditions could refer to ethical evaluation requirements.
Dodatni pogoji so lahko zahteve glede etične presoje.
Article 114 of the Financial Regulation.
Člen 114 Finančne uredbe.
Or any contractor retained for the purpose of providing administrative services for evaluation sessions.
Ali kateri koli izvajalec, najet za opravljanje upravnih storitev za posamezna ocenjevanja.
Following areas are under responsibility of DG RTD: human embryonic stem cells, non-human primates, human intervention, and proposals falling into these categories are automatically submitted to DG RTD for Ethics Review.
Na področje pristojnosti RTD spadajo naslednja področja: človeške zarodne izvorne celice, živalski primati, posegi na ljudeh in predlogi, ki spadajo v te kategorije; ta področja se samodejno predložijo v etično presojo GD RTD.
Such as clinical trials, and research involving invasive techniques on living persons (e.g. taking of tissue samples).
Kot so klinični preskusi in raziskave, ki vključujejo invazivne tehnike na živih ljudeh (npr. jemanje vzorcev tkiva).
Proposals falling into these categories are automatically submitted to DG RTD for Ethics Review.
Predlogi, ki spadajo v te kategorije, se samodejno predložijo GD RTD v etično presojo.
Taking into account the statement of the Commission of 24 July 2006 (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p. 42).
Ob upoštevanju Izjave Komisije z dne 24. julija 2006 (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str. 42).
The ERCEA may put in place an electronic submission system, which would be applicable to the paper forms and originals to be submitted in the framework of these rules for reimbursements.
ERCEA lahko vzpostavi elektronski sistem za oddajo, ki se bo uporabljal za oddajo obrazcev in izvirnikov v papirni obliki, v okviru teh pravil za povračilo potnih stroškov.
As a general rule, interviewees cannot be required: to leave their point of origin or the place where the interview is held before 07.00 (station or other means of transport) or 08.00 (airport); to arrive at the place where the interview is held after 21.00 (airport) or 22.00 (station or other means of transport); to arrive at their point of origin after 23.00 (airport, station or other means of transport).
Na splošno se od udeležencev razgovorov ne sme zahtevati, da zapustijo kraj odhoda ali kraj razgovora pred 7.00 (postaja ali drugo prevozno sredstvo) ali 8.00 (letališče); prispejo v kraj razgovora po 21.00 (letališče) ali 22.00 (postaja ali drugo prevozno sredstvo) ali da prispejo v kraj odhoda po 23.00 (letališče, postaja ali drugo prevozno sredstvo).
As defined in Commision Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 29 November 2001 amending its internal Rules of Procedure (OJ L 317, 3.12.2001, p. 1) regarding provisions of security and its successive amendments.
Kakor je to opredeljeno v Sklepu Komisije št. 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom z dne 29. novembra 2001 o spremembah njenega poslovnika (UL L 317, 3.12.2001, str. 1) v zvezi s pravilnikom o varnosti in njegovih naknadnih spremembah.
‘Security Aspects Letter (SAL)’: ‘a set of special contractual conditions, issued by the contracting authority, which forms an integral part of a classified contract involving access to or generation of EU classified information, and that identifies the security requirements or those elements of the classified contract requiring security protection’, as defined in section 27 of Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom.
„Listina varnostnih vidikov (LVV)“: „zbirka posebnih pogodbenih pogojev – ki jih objavi naročnik in so sestavni del tajnega naročila, ki vključuje dostop do tajnih podatkov EU ali njihov nastanek – ki navaja varnostne zahteve ali tiste elemente tajnega naročila, ki zahtevajo varnostno zaščito“, kakor je opredeljena v razdelku 27 Sklepa št. 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom.
As defined in Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom.
Kakor je opredeljena v Sklepu št. 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom.
Treatment of confidential data is governed by all the relevant community legislation, including the Institutions’ internal rules such as Decision 2001/844/EC amending its internal rules of procedure regarding provisions of security.
Ravnanje z zaupnimi podatki ureja vsa ustrezna zakonodaja Skupnosti, vključno z notranjimi varnostnimi pravili institucij, kot je Sklep Komisije 2001/844/ES o spremembah njenega poslovnika.
Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items (OJ L 134, 29.5.2009, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 428/2009 z dne 5. maja 2009 o vzpostavitvi režima Skupnosti za nadzor izvoza, prenosa, posredovanja in tranzita blaga z dvojno rabo (UL L 134, 29.5.2009, str. 1).
‘Third country’ means any country that is neither an EU Member State nor a country associated to FP7.
„Tretja država“ pomeni katero koli državo, ki ni članica EU in ni država, pridružena OP7.
Pursuant to such exclusion, the independent expert will be removed from the database and barred from re-registering for the duration of the exclusion.3.1.4. Independent observers
Po taki izključitvi se neodvisni strokovnjak izbriše iz podatkovne zbirke, poleg tega se ne sme ponovno registrirati, dokler traja izključitev.3.1.4 Neodvisni opazovalci
Feedback Following the peer review evaluation, the ERCEA provides feedback to the PI and the applicant legal entity.
Po postopku medsebojnega pregleda ERCEA pošlje povratne informacije glavnemu raziskovalcu in pravni osebi vlagateljici.
Head of ‘Scientific Management Department’
Head of „Scientific Management Department“
These requirements become contractual obligations.
Te zahteve postanejo pogodbene obveznosti.
Submission to an Ethics Review Panel
Predložitev odboru za etično presojo
For this purpose, the ERCEA will appoint independent experts to participate in the ethics review process. (See Annex B).
V ta namen ERCEA imenuje neodvisne strokovnjake, ki bodo sodelovali v postopku etične presoje (glej Prilogo B).
Cross-Panel Assessment (Assessment across Panels, domains, research fields, etc.) The cross-Panel assessment establishes a final recommended rank order of proposals retained for the call as a whole (across all fields of research open in the call), through a careful assessment of the quality of proposals across the different Panels.
Ocena med odbori (ocenjevanje med več odbori, področji, področji raziskav itd.) ocenjevanje med odbori določi končni priporočeni vrstni red predlogov, ki so ostali v okviru razpisa na splošno (med vsemi področji raziskav, določenimi v razpisu), z natančnim ocenjevanjem kakovosti predlogov med različnimi odbori.
on state aid C 39/03 (ex NN 119/02) implemented by Greece for air carriers in respect of losses sustained from 11 to 14 September 2001
o državni pomoči C 39/03 (ex NN 119/02), ki jo je Helenska republika dodelila letalskim prevoznikom zaradi škode, ki so jo utrpeli od 11. do 14. septembra 2001
(notified under document C(2006) 1580)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1580)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama, [1]
In accordance with Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, in a letter to the European Commission dated 24 September 2002, registered as received on 26 September 2002 under No TREN(2002) A/66844, the Greek Ministry of Transport set out the details of a scheme to compensate for losses in the airline industry following the attacks of 11 September 2001.
V skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES je grško ministrstvo za promet z dopisom z dne 24. septembra 2002, evidentiranim 26. septembra 2002 pod številko TREN (2002) A/66844, Komisiji priglasilo ureditev za nadomestilo izgub, ki so jih letalski prevozniki utrpeli zaradi atentatov 11. septembra 2001.
Having been implemented before its formal approval by the Commission, this measure was registered as non-notified aid under No NN 119/2002.
Ker se je ta ureditev izvajala, preden jo je Komisija uradno odobrila, je bila evidentirana kot nepriglašena pomoč pod številko NN 119/2002.
This was communicated by letter with acknowledgment of receipt sent by the Commission on 28 October 2002 (TREN(2002) D/17401).
Ta točka je bila poslana v dopisu s potrdilom o prejemu, ki so ga službe Komisije poslale 28. oktobra 2002 (TREN (2002) D/17401).
By letter of 27 May 2003, the Commission notified Greece of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of this aid.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 27. maja 2003 sporočila Grčiji, da bo sprožila postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe zoper to pomoč.
The Commission received the initial comments from Greece regarding the initiation of the procedure by letter of 3 December 2003, registered as received on 10 December 2003 under No SG(2003) A/12211.
Komisija je prve pripombe Grčije k sprožitvi postopka prejela z dopisom z dne 3. decembra 2003, evidentiranim 10. decembra 2003 pod številko SG (2003) A/12211.
Greece stated that it would be sending further information.
V njem je Grčija napovedala, da bo poslala še druge informacije.