natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the basis of the information contained in the complaint and the replies to the Commission's questionnaire, the following schemes, which allegedly involved the granting of subsidies by the Governmental authority, were investigated:
Na podlagi informacij iz pritožbe in odgovorov na vprašalnik Komisije so bile preverjene naslednje sheme, ki so domnevno vključevale dodeljevanje subvencij s strani vladnega organa:
Preferential lending to the coated paper industry
preferenčna posojila industriji premazanega papirja;
Income tax Programmes
programi za davek na prihodek:
Preferential tax policies for companies that are recognised as high or new technology enterprises
preferenčne davčne politike za visokotehnološke družbe in družbe z novo tehnologijo,
Preferential tax policies for Research & Development
preferenčne davčne politike za raziskave in razvoj,
Dividend exemption between qualified resident enterprises
Oprostitev plačila davka od dividend med rezidenčnimi podjetji, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje
Indirect Tax and Import Tariff Programmes
programi za posredne davke in uvozne tarife:
VAT and Tariff exemption on imported equipment
Oprostitev DDV in tarifna oprostitev na uvoženo opremo
VAT rebates on domestically produced equipment
Znižanje DDV na doma proizvedeno opremo
City maintenance and Construction Taxes and education surcharges for Foreign Invested Enterprises
mestne pristojbine za vzdrževanje in gradnjo ter dodatne dajatve za izobraževanje za družbe, v katere se vlaga tuji kapital;
Grant Programmes
programi subvencioniranja:
Famous Brands
Znane znamke
Special Funds for Encouraging Foreign Investment Projects
Posebni skladi za spodbujanje projektov tujih naložb
Anti-dumping Respondent Assistance
Pomoč udeležencem v protidampinški preiskavi
Shouguang Technology Renovation Grant
Subvencija za obnovo tehnologije v Shouguangu
Suzhou Industrial park Intellectual Property Right Fund
sklad za pravice intelektualne lastnine industrijskega parka Suzhou,
Subsidy of High-Tech Industrial Development Fund
Subvencija sklada za visokotehnološki industrijski razvoj
Award received from Suzhou Industrial Park for maintaining growth
Subvencija industrijskega parka Suzhou za ohranjanje rasti
Special fund for water pollution treatment of Taihu lake of Jiangsu province
posebni sklad za čiščenje onesnažene vode jezera Taihu v provinci Jiangsu,
Special funds for energy-saving of Suzhou Industrial Park
posebni skladi za varčevanje z energijo industrijskega parka Suzhou,
Special fund for reduction of total emissions of major pollutants at municipal level of Suzhou municipality
posebni sklad za zmanjšanje skupnih izpustov velikih onesnaževalcev na občinski ravni občine Suzhou,
Subsidy for water-saving and emission reduction
subvencija za varčevanje z vodo in zmanjšanje izpustov,
Environmental Protection award received from Suzhou Environmental Protection Bureau
subvencija za varstvo okolja urada za varstvo okolja v Suzhouju,
Energy saving award in Shouguang
subvencija za varčevanje z energijo v Shouguangu.
Government Provision of Goods and Services for Less than Adequate Remuneration (‘LTAR’)
zagotavljanje blaga in storitev s strani vlade za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo („LTAR“):
Provision of land-use rights
Zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišča
Provision of paper-making chemicals
Zagotavljanje kemikalij za izdelavo papirja
Provision of electricity
Zagotavljanje električne energije
PREFERENTIAL LENDING TO THE COATED PAPER INDUSTRY
PREFERENČNA POSOJILA INDUSTRIJI PREMAZANEGA PAPIRJA
It is alleged that Chinese producers of the product concerned benefit from low-interest rate loans from government policy banks and state-owned commercial banks (‘SOCBs’) pursuant to the GOC's policy to provide financial assistance in order to encourage and support the growth and development of the paper industry in China.
Domneva se, da imajo kitajski proizvajalci zadevnega izdelka v skladu s politiko kitajske vlade, ki zagotavlja finančno pomoč za spodbujanje in podporo rasti in razvoja papirne industrije na Kitajskem, koristi od posojil z nizko obrestno mero državnih bank in državnih komercialnih bank.
As illustrated in the five-year plans and industrial policy, preferential financing initiatives were granted by the banking system to the papermaking industry.
Kot je razvidno iz petletnih načrtov in industrijske politike, je bančni sistem papirni industriji odobril preferenčne finančne spodbude.
Use of facts available
Uporaba razpoložljivih dejstev
On the basis of the information contained in the complaint, the Commission sought to investigate the bank which was lending to the coated paper industry.
Na podlagi informacij iz pritožbe je bil namen Komisije preiskati posojila bank industriji premazanega papirja.
For these purposes it was considered necessary to ask the GOC to provide in its reply to the questionnaire and subsequent submissions specific information and data on a series of government plans and projects to encourage and support the development of China's paper sector.
Za te namene je bilo treba od kitajske vlade zahtevati, da v svojem izpolnjenem vprašalniku in nadaljnjih stališčih zagotovi posebne informacije in podatke o vrsti vladnih načrtov in projektov za spodbujanje in podporo razvoja sektorja papirja Kitajske.
These plans and projects were:
Ti načrti in projekti so bili:
China Civilian Economy and Social Development 10th Five-Year Plan (‘The 10th Five Year Plan’)
kitajski deseti petletni načrt civilnega gospodarskega in socialnega razvoja („10. petletni načrt“),
The ‘10th Five year Plan’ in the Papermaking Industry (‘Papermaking Plan’)
petletni načrt“ v industriji za izdelavo papirja („načrt za industrijo za izdelavo papirja“),
The 10th Five year and 2010 Special Plan for the Construction of a National Forestry and Papermaking Integration Project (‘Integration Project’)
petletni načrt in posebni načrt 2010 za izdelavo projekta povezovanja nacionalnega gozdarstva in izdelave papirja („projekt povezovanja“),
Decision No. 40 of the State Council on Promulgating and Implementing the ‘Temporary Provisions on Promoting Industrial Structure Adjustment’ (‘Decision No. 40’)
sklep št. 40 državnega sveta o razglasitvi in izvajanju „začasnih določb o spodbujanju prilagajanja industrijske strukture“ („sklep št. 40“),
Directory Catalogue on Readjustment of Industrial Structure (‘Directory Catalogue’)
kataloški seznam o ponovnem prilagajanju industrijske strukture („kataloški seznam“),
Guidelines for the Eleventh Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development (2006-2010) (‘11th Five-year Plan’)
smernice za enajsti petletni načrt za nacionalni gospodarski in socialni razvoj (2006–2010) („11. petletni načrt“),
State Council Circular on Realizing the Major Targets in (The 11th Five Year-Year Plan) and the Division of Tasks (‘11th five-year plan implementing circular’)
okrožnica državnega sveta o uresničevanju glavnih ciljev v (11. petletnem načrtu) in porazdelitvi nalog („okrožnica o izvajanju 11. petletnega načrta“),
2007 Development Policy for the Papermaking Industry (‘2007 Papermaking Plan’)
razvojna politika 2007 za industrijo za izdelavo papirja („načrt za industrijo za izdelavo papirja 2007“),
The Guandong Development Plan
razvojni načrt province Guandong,
The Zhanjiang City 11th Five-Year plan
petletni načrt mesta Zhanjiang,
The 11th Five Year Plan of Jining Municipality
petletni načrt občine Jining.
The GOC only partially provided the information requested in relation to the plans.
Kitajska vlada je samo delno predložila informacije, zahtevane v zvezi z načrti.
Only two of the plans requested were provided in full, i.e. in the Chinese version together with an English translation (Decision No. 40 and Directory Catalogue on Readjustment of Industrial Structure).
Samo dva zahtevana načrta sta bila predložena v celoti, tj. kitajska različica skupaj z angleškim prevodom (sklep št. 40 in kataloški seznam o ponovnem prilagajanju industrijske strukture).
For the three regional plans originally requested by the Commission, the Chinese authorities submitted that they were not relevant since the co-operating exporting producers are not located in these regions.
Za tri regionalne načrte, ki jih je Komisija prvotno zahtevala, so kitajski organi navedli, da niso pomembni, saj se sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki ne nahajajo v teh regijah.
They were thus not provided.
Zato niso bili predloženi.
The Commission accepted this but requested the development plans related to the areas (regions, provinces, municipalities) where the cooperating exporting producers are established.
Komisija je to sprejela, vendar je zahtevala razvojne načrte, povezane z območji (regijami, provincami, občinami), v katerih imajo sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki sedež.
The GOC provided Chinese copies of the 11th Five year plan for Jiangsu Province and 11th Five year plan for Shandong Province, but no translation whatsoever, not even a translation of the table of contents.
Kitajska vlada je predložila kitajske izvode 11. petletnega načrta za provinco Jiangsu in 11. petletnega načrta za provinco Shandong, vendar brez prevoda, prevedeno ni bilo niti kazalo vsebine.
In relation to two plans that were not provided, the GOC submitted that they covered the period between 2000 and 2005 and were thus irrelevant.
Glede dveh načrtov, ki nista bila predložena, je kitajska vlada navedla, da obsegata obdobje od leta 2000 do leta 2005 in sta zato nepotrebna.
The Commission accepted this.
Komisija se je s tem strinjala.
The remaining plans were provided only in Chinese (Integration Project, 11th Five-year Plan, 11th five-year plan implementing circular, 2007 Papermaking Plan) together with English tables of the contents.
Preostali načrti (projekt povezovanja, 11. petletni načrt, okrožnica o izvajanju 11. petletnega načrta, načrt za industrijo za izdelavo papirja 2007) so bili predloženi samo v kitajskem jeziku in s kazalom vsebine v angleščini.
The GOC claimed that the Commission's requests were too burdensome, that they only had limited resources and therefore could not translate the texts.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da so bile zahteve Komisije preveč obremenjujoče, da je imela na voljo samo omejena sredstva in zato ni mogla prevesti dokumentov.
With respect to the above it is noted that the Commission requested information that was deemed necessary for the investigation as the abovementioned documents had been identified in the complaint.
V zvezi z zgoraj navedenim je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija zahtevala informacije, ki so bile potrebne za preiskavo, saj so bili navedeni dokumenti opredeljeni v pritožbi.
Moreover the Commission had repeatedly emphasized the need to provide the requested documents in English.
Poleg tega je Komisija večkrat poudarila, da morajo biti zahtevani dokumenti predloženi v angleščini.
This is necessary for this type of significant document given that, on the basis of the index only, it was not possible to determine which part of the document is relevant for the investigation.
To je za to vrsto pomembnega dokumenta potrebno, saj samo na podlagi kazala ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, kateri del dokumenta je pomemben za preiskavo.
Moreover, the plans provided in Chinese were not voluminous and it appears that copies in English of the relevant documentation exist either from independent sources (legal firms that specialize in Chinese law) or from anti-subsidy investigations conducted in China by the United States of America (‘USA’).
Poleg tega načrti, predloženi v kitajskem jeziku, niso bili obsežni in zdi se, da obstajajo kopije ustrezne dokumentacije v angleščini od neodvisnih virov (odvetniških pisarn, ki se ukvarjajo s kitajskim pravom) ali protisubvencijskih preiskav, ki so jih na Kitajskem izvedle Združene države Amerike („ZDA“).
Consequently, the Commission had the possibility to verify only the following documents: the Decision No. 40, the Directory Catalogue and the 2007 Papermaking Plan, an English version of which was in the complaint and it was also made available from an exporting producer.
Zato je lahko Komisija preverila samo naslednje dokumente: sklep št. 40, kataloški sezam in načrt za industrijo za izdelavo papirja 2007, katerega angleška različica je bila v pritožbi, predložil pa jo je tudi proizvajalec izvoznik.
In order to investigate the level of government intervention in the Chinese financial market and obtain the necessary overview of the financial sector in the PRC, the Commission requested information on the percentage of government ownership of financial institutions and on the records of amounts/percentages of loans given by State owned banks.
Da bi Komisija lahko preiskala raven poseganja države na kitajskem finančnem trgu in pridobila potreben pregled finančnega sektorja v LRK, je zahtevala informacije o odstotkih vladnega lastništva finančnih ustanov in o evidencah o zneskih/odstotkih posojil, ki so jih dale državne banke.
The GOC claimed that they did not have any records on the bank shareholding although Article 61 of the Law on Commercial Banks [2003] No. 13 provides that banks report these data ‘to the banking regulatory organ of the State Council and People's Bank of China’.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da nima nobene evidence o imetništvu delnic bank, čeprav člen 61 Zakona o komercialnih bankah [2003] št. 13 določa, da morajo banke te podatke posredovati „organu bančnih regulatorjev državnega sveta in Ljudski banki Kitajske“.
As regards the amounts/percentages of loans given by State owned banks, the GOC confirmed that although relevant data was kept, it could not provide it.
Glede zneskov/odstotkov posojil, ki so jih dale državne banke, je kitajska vlada potrdila, da sicer hrani ustrezne podatke, vendar jih ne more predložiti.
The Commission further facilitated the work of GOC by limiting the requested information on the percentage of government ownership only to such financial institutions that were found to provide loans to the co-operating exporting producers.
Komisija je nadalje olajšala delo kitajske vlade s tem, ko je omejila zahtevane informacije glede odstotka vladnega lastništva samo na finančne ustanove, za katere se je ugotovilo, da so odobrile posojila sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
Nevertheless, the GOC did not provide relevant data even for this restricted segment of financial institutions operating in China.
Kitajska vlada kljub temu ni predložila ustreznih podatkov za ta omejen segment finančnih ustanov, ki poslujejo na Kitajskem.
In order to investigate the lending policies of the Chinese banks (e.g. methods used as regards the setting of the interest loan rates, assessment of loans etc), the GOC was asked to provide information with respect to the policies followed by the relevant state authorities namely the People's Bank of China (‘PBOC’) and the Bank Regulatory Commission.
Da bi Komisija lahko preiskala posojilne politike kitajskih bank (tj. metode, uporabljene za določanje obrestnih mer za posojila, oceno posojil itd.), je od kitajske vlade zahtevala, da predloži informacije v zvezi s politikami, ki jih izvajajo ustrezni državni organi, namreč Ljudska banka Kitajske in Komisija bančnih regulatorjev.
The GOC did not provide any relevant information on the loan policies.
Kitajska vlada ni predložila nobenih ustreznih informacij o posojilnih politikah.
No document, regulation or guidelines addressed to the banking system from the PBOC was provided in order to substantiate the role of the PBOC in setting interest rates and its relation with the banking system.
Ljudska banka Kitajske ni predložila nobenega dokumenta, predpisa ali smernice, ki bi se nanašali na bančni sistem, da bi utemeljila svojo vlogo pri določanju obrestnih mer in svojo povezavo z bančnim sistemom.
Furthermore no explanation was given, although specifically requested, with respect to the application of the Law on Commercial Banks [2003] No. 13 and particularly Articles 34, 38 and 39 that set out the basic rules governing loans and other businesses of commercial banks.
Poleg tega ni bila predložena nobena razlaga glede uporabe Zakona o komercialnih bankah [2003] št. 13 ter zlasti členov 34, 38 in 39, ki določajo temeljne predpise za posojila in druge vrste poslovanj komercialnih bank, čeprav je bila izrecno zahtevana.
In order to investigate the lending policies of the Chinese banks that provided loans during the IP to the cooperating exporting producers, the Commission requested the GOC to arrange meetings with specific banks that have provided loans to the cooperating exporting producers in order to verify information concerning preferential lending to the CFP industry in China.
Da bi Komisija lahko preiskala posojilne politike kitajskih bank, ki so med OP sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom dale posojila, je od kitajske vlade zahtevala, da se dogovori za sestanke z določenimi bankami, ki so dale posojila sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, da bi preverila informacije glede preferenčnih posojil industriji premazanega finega papirja na Kitajskem.
The GOC claimed that it was unable to intervene with State-owned banks to arrange such meetings.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da ni mogla posredovati pri državnih bankah in se dogovoriti za sestanke.
Therefore, no evidence was collected from Chinese banks as to whether and, if so, how those banks evaluate credit risk when providing loans.
Zato od kitajskih bank niso bili zbrani nobeni dokazi o tem, ali te banke ocenjujejo kreditno tveganje, ko dodelijo posojila, in če to drži, kako ga ocenjujejo.
The GOC was made aware of the consequences of non-cooperation in accordance with Article 28(1) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Kitajska vlada je bila seznanjena s posledicami nesodelovanja v skladu s členom 28(1) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
In view of this lack of cooperation, it has been necessary, in addition to taking account of relevant GOC documents submitted by other parties, to use information from secondary sources, including the complaint and publicly available information retrieved from internet.
Zaradi tega pomanjkanja sodelovanja je bilo treba poleg upoštevanja ustreznih dokumentov kitajske vlade, ki so jih predložile druge strani, uporabiti informacije iz drugotnih virov, vključno s pritožbo in javno dostopnimi informacijami, pridobljenimi s spleta.
The GOC disputed the use of facts available but did not provide any further new evidence.
Kitajska vlada je nasprotovala uporabi razpoložljivih dejstev, vendar ni predložila nobenih nadaljnjih novih dokazov.
The cooperating exporting producers were also asked to arrange meetings with specific banks that have provided loans to them during the IP in order to verify information concerning preferential lending to the CFP industry in China.
Komisija je od sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov prav tako zahtevala, da se dogovorijo za sestanke z določenimi bankami, ki so jim med OP dale posojilo, da bi preverila informacije v zvezi s preferenčnimi posojili industriji premazanega finega papirja na Kitajskem.
However, no such meetings took place.
Vendar ni bilo nobenega takega sestanka.
The cooperating exporting producers communicated the repeated requests of the Commission for such meetings but the relevant banks refused to cooperate with the investigation.
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki so posredovali večkratne zahteve Komisije glede takih sestankov, vendar so zadevne banke zavrnile sodelovanje pri preiskavi.
The co-operating exporting producers were made aware of the consequences of non-cooperation in accordance with Article 28(1) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki so bili seznanjeni s posledicami nesodelovanja v skladu s členom 28(1) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
In view of this lack of cooperation, it was considered necessary to base any findings with respect to the loans provided by banks to the co-operating exporting producers on facts available.
Zaradi tega pomanjkanja sodelovanja je bilo treba morebitne ugotovitve glede posojil, ki so jih banke dale sodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, utemeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
The co-operating exporting producers disputed the use of facts available but did not provide any further evidence.
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki so nasprotovali uporabi razpoložljivih dejstev, vendar niso predložili nobenih nadaljnjih dokazov.
One Chinese exporting producer was requested to provide specific information concerning a specific debt restructuring agreement with three Chinese banks.
Od enega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika je Komisija zahtevala, da predloži določene informacije glede posebnega sporazuma o prestrukturiranju dolga s tremi kitajskimi bankami.
The aforesaid exporting producer refused to provide the necessary information.
Omenjeni proizvajalec izvoznik ni želel zagotoviti potrebnih informacij.
Consequently, it was not possible to verify the relevant overall agreement and corresponding contract loans as well as all specific points like duration of loans, repayment schedules and interest rates.
Zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti zadevnega splošnega dogovora in pripadajočih najemanj posojil ali vseh posebnih vprašanj, kot je trajanje posojil, časovni razpored odplačil in obrestne mere.
The co-operating exporting producer was made aware of the consequences of non-cooperation in accordance with Article 28(1) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je bil seznanjen s posledicami nesodelovanja v skladu s členom 28(1) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
In view of this lack of cooperation, it was considered necessary to base any findings with respect to the relevant loans provided by banks to that producer on facts available.
Zaradi tega pomanjkanja sodelovanja je bilo treba morebitne ugotovitve glede zadevnih posojil, ki so jih banke dale sodelujočemu proizvajalcu izvozniku, utemeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
The co-operating exporting producer disputed the use of facts available but did not provide any further evidence.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je nasprotoval uporabi razpoložljivih dejstev, vendar ni predložil nobenih nadaljnjih dokazov.
Government intervention in the financial banking system for a preferential lending to paper making industry
Posegi države v finančni bančni sistem za preferenčna posojila industriji za izdelavo papirja
Role of government plans
Vloga vladnih načrtov
The investigation established the existence of specific policy plans with respect to the papermaking industry.
Preiskava je pokazala obstoj posebnih načrtov politike v zvezi z industrijo za izdelavo papirja.
These plans stipulate that the state authorities monitor closely the performance of the papermaking industry and implement special policies (e.g. implementing decrees) for the fulfilment of the goals of the policy plans.
Ti načrti določajo, da državni organi skrbno spremljajo uspešnost industrije za izdelavo papirja in izvajajo posebne ukrepe (npr. izvedbeni odloki) za izpolnjevanje ciljev načrtov politike.
Furthermore, the investigation also established that the specific policy plans provide for preferential lending to the paper making industry.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da posebni načrti politike industriji za izdelavo papirja zagotavljajo preferenčna posojila.
Indeed, by examining Decision No 40 and the specific financing section of the 2007 Papermaking Plan, it is obvious that the Chinese state planning system directs banks to provide loans to the paper making industry.
Dejansko je ob pregledu sklepa št. 40 in posebnega oddelka o financiranju iz načrta za industrijo za izdelavo papirja 2007 očitno, da kitajski sistem državnega načrtovanja bankam nalaga zagotavljanje posojil industriji za izdelavo papirja.
With reference to Decision No 40, it is noted that that act is an order from the State Council i.e. the highest administrative body in the PRC and so legally binding for other public bodies and the economic operators.
Glede sklepa št. 40 je treba opozoriti, da je ta akt odredba državnega sveta, tj. najvišjega upravnega organa v LRK, in je pravno zavezujoč za druge javne organe in gospodarske subjekte.
It classifies the industrial sectors into ‘Encouraged, Restrictive and Eliminated Projects’.
Sklep industrijske sektorje uvršča med „spodbujane, omejene in izključene projekte“.